Scared Monkeys Discussion Forum

Natalee Holloway => LCD Archive => Topic started by: klaasend on September 10, 2006, 12:44:49 AM



Title: Lively Case Discussion #522 9/10 - 9/12/2006
Post by: klaasend on September 10, 2006, 12:44:49 AM
YOU ALL KNOW THE RULES

(http://i14.photobucket.com/albums/a306/klaasend/w3.gif)(http://i14.photobucket.com/albums/a306/klaasend/wtc2.gif)(http://i14.photobucket.com/albums/a306/klaasend/w3.gif)


Title: Lively Case Discussion #522 9/10 - 9/12/2006
Post by: klaasend on September 10, 2006, 01:21:59 AM
Yep, more than anyones I would like to see what LORENZO had to say.   :wink:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #522 9/10 - 9/12/2006
Post by: San on September 10, 2006, 01:22:20 AM
Very nice photo Klaas.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #522 9/10 - 9/12/2006
Post by: San on September 10, 2006, 01:23:13 AM
Quote from: "klaasend"
Yep, more than anyones I would like to see what LORENZO had to say.   :wink:

Klaas we only have his first name right?  Would you be surprised to hear his full name?


Title: Lively Case Discussion #522 9/10 - 9/12/2006
Post by: Shell on September 10, 2006, 01:23:56 AM
Quote from: "klaasend"
Yep, more than anyones I would like to see what LORENZO had to say.   :wink:


Me too Klaas, but I want to know why on earth they would even question Lorenzo, unless someone brought up his name.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #522 9/10 - 9/12/2006
Post by: San on September 10, 2006, 01:24:58 AM
Quote from: "Shell"
Quote from: "klaasend"
Yep, more than anyones I would like to see what LORENZO had to say.   :wink:


Me too Klaas, but I want to know why on earth they would even question Lorenzo, unless someone brought up his name.

They have to know something Shell.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #522 9/10 - 9/12/2006
Post by: klaasend on September 10, 2006, 01:25:12 AM
Quote from: "San"
Quote from: "klaasend"
Yep, more than anyones I would like to see what LORENZO had to say.   :wink:

Klaas we only have his first name right?  Would you be surprised to hear his full name?

No we have his full name.  Lorenzo Van Rijn

Edit:  I can see San slapping her head right now, lol  :lol:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #522 9/10 - 9/12/2006
Post by: Shell on September 10, 2006, 01:26:38 AM
Quote from: "San"
Quote from: "Shell"
Quote from: "klaasend"
Yep, more than anyones I would like to see what LORENZO had to say.   :wink:


Me too Klaas, but I want to know why on earth they would even question Lorenzo, unless someone brought up his name.

They have to know something Shell.


I know! He is older than those boys, and was having a party as I recall, and was an alibi for someone, or the other way around? I forgot now :oops:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #522 9/10 - 9/12/2006
Post by: San on September 10, 2006, 01:28:28 AM
Quote from: "klaasend"
Quote from: "San"
Quote from: "klaasend"
Yep, more than anyones I would like to see what LORENZO had to say.   :wink:

Klaas we only have his first name right?  Would you be surprised to hear his full name?

No we have his full name.  Lorenzo Van Rijn

Edit:  I can see San slapping her head right now, lol  :lol:

How did you know.  Can you see me :lol:   Do you have special powers.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #522 9/10 - 9/12/2006
Post by: Shell on September 10, 2006, 01:28:34 AM
This lady needs her rest now. Cya tomorrow you all. :)


Title: Lively Case Discussion #522 9/10 - 9/12/2006
Post by: San on September 10, 2006, 01:30:06 AM
Quote from: "Shell"
Quote from: "San"
Quote from: "Shell"
Quote from: "klaasend"
Yep, more than anyones I would like to see what LORENZO had to say.   :wink:


Me too Klaas, but I want to know why on earth they would even question Lorenzo, unless someone brought up his name.

They have to know something Shell.


I know! He is older than those boys, and was having a party as I recall, and was an alibi for someone, or the other way around? I forgot now :oops:

Don't feel bad I forget all the time.  Just look at my above post :lol:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #522 9/10 - 9/12/2006
Post by: San on September 10, 2006, 01:30:40 AM
Quote from: "Shell"
This lady needs her rest now. Cya tomorrow you all. :)

Nite Shell.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #522 9/10 - 9/12/2006
Post by: igsigs on September 10, 2006, 01:31:28 AM
Quote from: "klaasend"
Yep, more than anyones I would like to see what LORENZO had to say.   :wink:

Did ya know GrannyToad has L_____O pics? Won't post em(which i kinda agree with).

I asked her if he looked like any former or current suspects and she said...

"What, like Joran or Paulus? You could say that. Or to put it another way...he would qualify for government work."


Title: Lively Case Discussion #522 9/10 - 9/12/2006
Post by: klaasend on September 10, 2006, 01:31:32 AM
Quote from: "Shell"
This lady needs her rest now. Cya tomorrow you all. :)

Nite Shell


Title: Lively Case Discussion #522 9/10 - 9/12/2006
Post by: San on September 10, 2006, 01:32:21 AM
GOODNIGHT EVERYONE

Thanks Klaas for all your hard work.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #522 9/10 - 9/12/2006
Post by: klaasend on September 10, 2006, 01:32:56 AM
Quote from: "igsigs"
Quote from: "klaasend"
Yep, more than anyones I would like to see what LORENZO had to say.   :wink:

Did ya know GrannyToad has L_____O pics? Won't post em(which i kinda agree with).

I asked her if he looked like any former or current suspects and she said...

"What, like Joran or Paulus? You could say that. Or to put it another way...he would qualify for government work."

And how do we know the pictures she has are really him?  I have some photos that could be him but I'm not positive.  Why all this protection for Lorenzo???


Title: Lively Case Discussion #522 9/10 - 9/12/2006
Post by: klaasend on September 10, 2006, 01:33:35 AM
Quote from: "San"
GOODNIGHT EVERYONE

Thanks Klaas for all your hard work.


Nite San - you're welcome!  See you tomorrow!


Title: Lively Case Discussion #522 9/10 - 9/12/2006
Post by: igsigs on September 10, 2006, 01:38:44 AM
Quote from: "klaasend"

And how do we know the pictures she has are really him?  I have some photos that could be him but I'm not positive.  Why all this protection for Lorenzo???

I think she will not post them because that was not the intention of the person who gave them to her. I don't know if they really are Lorenzo, but GT seems to think they are. And she is not a "i have a secret" or "i can't say right now" poster.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #522 9/10 - 9/12/2006
Post by: klaasend on September 10, 2006, 01:45:21 AM
Quote from: "igsigs"
Quote from: "klaasend"

And how do we know the pictures she has are really him?  I have some photos that could be him but I'm not positive.  Why all this protection for Lorenzo???

I think she will not post them because that was not the intention of the person who gave them to her. I don't know if they really are Lorenzo, but GT seems to think they are. And she is not a "i have a secret" or "i can't say right now" poster.

I also have a similar photo that was sent to me months ago that is supposed to be Lorenzo.  It was posted a couple months ago at the RU site and posted at SM as well.  For the same reason of GT I'm not going to repost it.  I would much rather read a witness statement than see a photo of Lorenzo anyway.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #522 9/10 - 9/12/2006
Post by: Hotshot on September 10, 2006, 01:46:21 AM
Me too


Title: Lively Case Discussion #522 9/10 - 9/12/2006
Post by: cubbeegirl on September 10, 2006, 01:51:29 AM
Me three.....


Title: Lively Case Discussion #522 9/10 - 9/12/2006
Post by: klaasend on September 10, 2006, 01:53:42 AM
Goodnight all!  I need to finish some stuff up for tomorrow, then call it a night.

See you all tomorrow.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #522 9/10 - 9/12/2006
Post by: cubbeegirl on September 10, 2006, 01:58:08 AM
Night klaas, I have been lurking and reading off and on all night and now that I am caught up am going to call it a night myself. Night everyone.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #522 9/10 - 9/12/2006
Post by: SunFreak2 on September 10, 2006, 02:18:02 AM
Revisiting the Fishermen's Huts:

1) Woman attacked at Hadacurari Beach fisherman's huts week prior to Natalee's disappearance

2) J2K lied many times, first about the HI drop off, then about the Mariott dropoff, & how Joran got home from the huts

3) ALE involved in cover-up - perhaps helped by providing info about the previous attack as place to claim she disappeared from

4) Partial truth found in the lies

5) Deepak's urination spot in Malmok - huts right there at beach.
   Lighthouse, sand dunes, and rocks close-by

6) ALE doesn't think J2K at Marriott/Hadacurari Huts.

7) Fisherman saw no one, but later saw a light colored car or SUV

8) Comment about Satish running over a girl

9) How did Joran ger behind the wheel at the pond?

HUTS AT MALMOK BEACH BELOW THE LIGHTHOUSE AS SEEN FROM THE OCEAN
(http://i67.photobucket.com/albums/h291/SunFreak2/Lighthousesteps.jpg)

ARIAL VIEW FROM OCEAN OF HUTS, BEACH, LIGHTHOUSE
(http://i67.photobucket.com/albums/h291/SunFreak2/Ariallighthousepavementhuts-caption.jpg)


SO, if Natalee is sitting behind Deepak in the car, when Deepak gets out to urinate, Natalee could jump out right after him.  Natalee takes off running. Joran jumps out to chase her.  Satish slides into driver's seat & follows in car.  Between Joran & Deepak chasing her, Natalee was probably running scared for her life. She's drugged so she's not functioning well cognitively or with physical coordination.  She either falls on her own, is pushed (tackled) by Joran, or hit by the car and goes flying into the rocks.  She's bleeding profusely from a head wound and most likely other laceratons from the rocks.  They grab her, throw her in the backseat, getting blood on the seat covers and head liner.  Deepak & Satish are freaking out so Joran the level headed psychopath drives.  They pull over at the pond to wash the blood off, check on Natalee and figure out what to do next.  Now, I think they take Natalee to Joran's, and the Kalpoes go home.

Natalee makes her calls in here....
Is this where Joran involves Guido, Koen, Sander or Freddy or does he go to Paulus?


Title: Lively Case Discussion #522 9/10 - 9/12/2006
Post by: SunFreak2 on September 10, 2006, 02:42:44 AM
I'm turning out the lights's  as no udder munkey but me is here rattlin roun this cage tonight.

Shhhh....... don't wake Nemo.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #522 9/10 - 9/12/2006
Post by: LilPuma on September 10, 2006, 03:07:12 AM
I tried to read the last thread, but it's getting late and I couldn't finish.  If I had stopped reading 15 minutes earlier and come here, SunFreak wouldn't have been all alone.   :(   But I learned a few things reading tonight - let me know if I missed anything important.   Many of you like grits; I have never tasted them.  Waffle House - ain't none around here that I know of; we have IHOP (International House of Pancakes).  Klaas rocks and wants to see Lorenzo's statement.  We all hope Larry is correct and we'll get some answers.  We all feel for Dave, who said his tape off of Skeeter's hard drive is very clear and Dana is the bestest.  Deepak is in Aruba, not Florida and his 5/31/05 statement is up.  Don't know if I'm all caught up but SunFreak took all the snacks with her when she left.  


Never doubt that a small group of concerned citizens can change the world.  Indeed, it's the only thing that ever has.  Margaret Mead


Title: Lively Case Discussion #522 9/10 - 9/12/2006
Post by: Tylergal on September 10, 2006, 08:09:37 AM
Morning, Monkeys.  Lots of theories and speculation going on and so much of it seems so plausible.  I think the truth would have put all the theories to rest, but I think SunFreak might be onto something.  Is this not when they were "driving fast?"  I think that was when they had a very seriously injured or dead Natalee on their hands.

CALL OUT TO MRS. RED:  There must be Waffle House's in the Northeast.  I saw the website of John Kerry's girlfriend and the theme song was by John Kerry, and he was singing, "I get my women at the waffle house."


Title: Lively Case Discussion #522 9/10 - 9/12/2006
Post by: San on September 10, 2006, 08:36:07 AM
Quote from: "SunFreak2"
Revisiting the Fishermen's Huts:


{{EDITED}}

SO, if Natalee is sitting behind Deepak in the car, when Deepak gets out to urinate, Natalee could jump out right after him.  Natalee takes off running. Joran jumps out to chase her.  Satish slides into driver's seat & follows in car.  Between Joran & Deepak chasing her, Natalee was probably running scared for her life. She's drugged so she's not functioning well cognitively or with physical coordination.  She either falls on her own, is pushed (tackled) by Joran, or hit by the car and goes flying into the rocks.  She's bleeding profusely from a head wound and most likely other laceratons from the rocks.  They grab her, throw her in the backseat, getting blood on the seat covers and head liner.  Deepak & Satish are freaking out so Joran the level headed psychopath drives.  They pull over at the pond to wash the blood off, check on Natalee and figure out what to do next.  Now, I think they take Natalee to Joran's, and the Kalpoes go home.

Natalee makes her calls in here....

Is this where Joran involves Guido, Koen, Sander or Freddy or does he go to Paulus?

Great theory.  This is what I think happened.  This is where Paulus made the decision not to help her.  He knows Joran is in deep sh!t and he won't help Natalee because she got the phone call off from his home.  They are all going down if they do.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #522 9/10 - 9/12/2006
Post by: San on September 10, 2006, 08:37:15 AM
GOODMORNING EVERYONE


Hi Tyler :D


Title: Lively Case Discussion #522 9/10 - 9/12/2006
Post by: justinsmama on September 10, 2006, 08:50:19 AM
Hi, everyone! I see that Klaas was finally able to break away. I had a great evening last night.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #522 9/10 - 9/12/2006
Post by: MissinNat on September 10, 2006, 09:08:54 AM
Quote from: "Tylergal"
Morning, Monkeys.  Lots of theories and speculation going on and so much of it seems so plausible.  I think the truth would have put all the theories to rest, but I think SunFreak might be onto something.  Is this not when they were "driving fast?"  I think that was when they had a very seriously injured or dead Natalee on their hands.

CALL OUT TO MRS. RED:  There must be Waffle House's in the Northeast.  I saw the website of John Kerry's girlfriend and the theme song was by John Kerry, and he was singing, "I get my women at the waffle house."


Good morning Tyler, San, & Justins!  Cant' wait to see the new statements this morning.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #522 9/10 - 9/12/2006
Post by: justinsmama on September 10, 2006, 09:31:30 AM
http://www.wafflehouse.com/


Title: Lively Case Discussion #522 9/10 - 9/12/2006
Post by: BTgirl on September 10, 2006, 09:45:15 AM
Good morning monkeys.

I really like SunFreaks's theory. It ties together a lot of the loose ends, IMO.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #522 9/10 - 9/12/2006
Post by: Shizaru on September 10, 2006, 10:14:42 AM
Any theory that has all 3 suspects present when she was seriously injured or killed is not realistic.  It's totally inconsistent with the timing of Deepaks' computer activity, the text mesages between Joran and Deepak, and the secretly recorded polis conversation, which prove beyond a reasonable doubt that least one memeber of the trio does not know what happened to her.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #522 9/10 - 9/12/2006
Post by: Shizaru on September 10, 2006, 10:34:24 AM
In addition to Natalee's initiating contact with Joran and flirting with him at the bar, after ignoring him at the casino, the comments by Deepak in his 5/31 statement, that she told Deepak to drive around, and called out some boy's name from the car, are support for my theory that she left with Joran in part based on some sort of typical teenage agenda: Trying to make another boy jealous, or impress her friends, or something like that.  It certainly looks as tho she wanted to be seen leaving with Joran.  

Of course I understand why her parents prefer to believe that she was drugged and that despite being drunk and naive, she would not have gotten in a car with strangers.  However in truth it does a disservice to the family, for those of us who are more emotionally removed and objective, to ignore the strong circumstantial evidence pointing away from that scenario, and towards an impulsive crime of opportunity, date rape gone wrong.   Even if Joran is guilty, which I have no doubt he is, getting locked into the idea that she was drugged, as part of planned abduction and rape by all three suspects, takes you down the wrong path when it comes to such things as determining the most likely crime scene and cause of death.  It has I think even prevented the family from most effectively countering the attacks on Natalee... I suspect that the reason her family has never mentioned the incident of Natalee objecting to the nudity in the DVD that Satish put on, even tho it shows how Joran has been intentionally omitting details that don't fit the nutty/slutty image of Natalee he has been trying to portray, is that it also doesn't fit the idea that Natalee was a helpless prisoner or that she thought she was in a cab.  And furthermore if she was drugged, that leaves open the theoretical possibility that she would have consented to sex with Joran alone.  I've seen many comments by people who believe that Joran is guilty or are on the fence, to the effect of  "maybe she did want Joran, but not 2K as well..."  OTOH, if the truth is that 2K were just the drivers who dropped Joran and Natalee off at the beach together,  and then Natalee died fighting against Joran alone (which is what I have concluded is the scenario most consistent with the evidence), that proves that Beth was basically right about who her daughter was, even with inhibitions lowered by intoxication, Natalee would not have consented to sex with a stranger.  So ironically the dogmatic belief on the part of most family supporters that this must have been a planned drugging/abduction/gang rape may actually be depriving Natalee of the moral credit she deserves.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #522 9/10 - 9/12/2006
Post by: blah on September 10, 2006, 10:39:32 AM
Apparently in Aruba, investigators are not allowed to ask questions.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #522 9/10 - 9/12/2006
Post by: Buckeye on September 10, 2006, 11:13:03 AM
Shizaru

I believe there was and probably still is an island passtime of hooking up with young American tourists the night before they are to leave.  I think the locals know that most have one last celebration and that it is a good time to take advantage. I do not believe Natalee had her eyes on Joran to play any silly game.  Deepak says after asking him to dance, she joined a group of her friends.  I can envision Natalee asking everyone to come on and dance (to celebrate their last night). I don't think she set out for him or she would have been hanging on him at the casino. She was not playing some teenage girl game.  She was played .  Nothing this bad might have happened before...but the game was well established.  I am not sure if you are aware that you are coming across as implying that Natalee asked for trouble.  I don't believe this and I am somewhat offended that what happened is being related to a female character flaw or lack of character.  Trusting young (naive) women don't see danger in friendliness...there are dangerous and ugly people in all age groups.  Please don't imply Natalee had anything to do with what happened.  She never saw the plan or knew she was the game. JMO


Title: Lively Case Discussion #522 9/10 - 9/12/2006
Post by: Kat_Gram on September 10, 2006, 11:13:52 AM
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Snipped from Shiaru's post :
In addition to Natalee's initiating contact with Joran and flirting with him at the bar, after ignoring him at the casino, the comments by Deepak in his 5/31 statement, that she told Deepak to drive around, and called out some boy's name from the car, are support for my theory that she left with Joran in part based on some sort of typical teenage agenda: Trying to make another boy jealous, or impress her friends, or something like that. It certainly looks as tho she wanted to be seen leaving with Joran.
a.) Ignoring him at the casino... based on one still shot.. the others were playing cards.. she was not... Joran was more interested in the other girl.
b.) Wanted to be seen leaving with Joran ?  No one saw her " with " him.
It was all very casual. My thinking is that they went to C & C's looking for one or any of those girls. They knew it was their last night in Aruba, some of them had met Joran. He was a friendly face by the Sunday night. The object of this game Joran plays 20 x before is to get one right at closing time. Get her into the car ( parked in the back ). There are no witnesses as to who the " girl" left with, there had not been a whole lot of contact with Joran in C & C's. Therefore, if a girl was to complain to the police the next day, there would be very little to figure out who she left with. And no witnesses to help her out.
That is my opinion.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #522 9/10 - 9/12/2006
Post by: Buckeye on September 10, 2006, 11:15:36 AM
Kat

I'm with you.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #522 9/10 - 9/12/2006
Post by: Kat_Gram on September 10, 2006, 11:22:20 AM
Ok, here I go making mountains out of molehills and splitting hairs... In my last post..

It doesn't matter WHY she got into the car. She did, and hasn't been seen since.
OR who I agree or disagree with, it is just my opinion. I have no more to go on than anyone else.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #522 9/10 - 9/12/2006
Post by: Kat_Gram on September 10, 2006, 11:24:24 AM
Buckeye, yes, she was played. And then they continued on.. those boys played the police and the prosecutors and worst of all, the family.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #522 9/10 - 9/12/2006
Post by: Smish on September 10, 2006, 11:28:44 AM
Quote from: "Shizaru"
In addition to Natalee's initiating contact with Joran and flirting with him at the bar, after ignoring him at the casino, the comments by Deepak in his 5/31 statement, that she told Deepak to drive around, and called out some boy's name from the car, are support for my theory that she left with Joran in part based on some sort of typical teenage agenda: Trying to make another boy jealous, or impress her friends, or something like that.  It certainly looks as tho she wanted to be seen leaving with Joran.  

Of course I understand why her parents prefer to believe that she was drugged and that despite being drunk and naive, she would not have gotten in a car with strangers.  However in truth it does a disservice to the family, for those of us who are more emotionally removed and objective, to ignore the strong circumstantial evidence pointing away from that scenario, and towards an impulsive crime of opportunity, date rape gone wrong.   Even if Joran is guilty, which I have no doubt he is, getting locked into the idea that she was drugged, as part of planned abduction and rape by all three suspects, takes you down the wrong path when it comes to such things as determining the most likely crime scene and cause of death.  It has I think even prevented the family from most effectively countering the attacks on Natalee... I suspect that the reason her family has never mentioned the incident of Natalee objecting to the nudity in the DVD that Satish put on, even tho it shows how Joran has been intentionally omitting details that don't fit the nutty/slutty image of Natalee he has been trying to portray, is that it also doesn't fit the idea that Natalee was a helpless prisoner or that she thought she was in a cab.  And furthermore if she was drugged, that leaves open the theoretical possibility that she would have consented to sex with Joran alone.  I've seen many comments by people who believe that Joran is guilty or are on the fence, to the effect of  "maybe she did want Joran, but not 2K as well..."  OTOH, if the truth is that 2K were just the drivers who dropped Joran and Natalee off at the beach together,  and then Natalee died fighting against Joran alone (which is what I have concluded is the scenario most consistent with the evidence), that proves that Beth was basically right about who her daughter was, even with inhibitions lowered by intoxication, Natalee would not have consented to sex with a stranger.  So ironically the dogmatic belief on the part of most family supporters that this must have been a planned drugging/abduction/gang rape may actually be depriving Natalee of the moral credit she deserves.

I disagree.Why couldn't Natalee had been drugged and also thought Joran was giving her a lift in a taxi?We have no statements from Natalee,only from the suspects.We do have a couple of Bama kids stating that:
1)Joran presented himself as a 19 yo vacationing college sporter from Holland.
2)Joran hanging around the HI and casino on the days that the Bama kids were there....they could have believed that he was indeed a tourist at the hotel...same as them.
Why isn't it believable that:
1)Joran could have offered Natalee a taxi ride back to the hotel,he could have said his friends on the island(that he met years ago while vacationing on Aruba)were running a taxi service.
Joran could have seen Natalee feeling sick from the drinking and the possible date rape drugging and offered her a ride back to THIER hotel?
I do not believe that this was Joran's or the Kalpoe's first time playing the PIMP game.I believe they have played this game quite a few times before,or at least Joran has.I also do not believe that J2K are the only PIMPS on Aruba playing this game.In fact I don't think 2K are part of the original PIMPS.The Kalpoe's were not Joran's first choice of who was to be the driver that night.Jaime was,before Joran even met the Bama girls that night.This PIMP game has been played numerous times on Aruba and played by a few different groups of PIMPS.They even have island girls(Pimpettes)that help them in thier conquests.Something bad happened while they played the PIMP game that night with Natalee.I don't place much credibility in those puter and phone transcripts.ALE helped dirty all of that info,so I really don't know what evidences they really had.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #522 9/10 - 9/12/2006
Post by: San on September 10, 2006, 11:30:22 AM
Quote from: "Shizaru"
In addition to Natalee's initiating contact with Joran and flirting with him at the bar, after ignoring him at the casino, the comments by Deepak in his 5/31 statement, that she told Deepak to drive around, and called out some boy's name from the car, are support for my theory that she left with Joran in part based on some sort of typical teenage agenda: Trying to make another boy jealous, or impress her friends, or something like that.  It certainly looks as tho she wanted to be seen leaving with Joran.  

Of course I understand why her parents prefer to believe that she was drugged and that despite being drunk and naive, she would not have gotten in a car with strangers.  However in truth it does a disservice to the family, for those of us who are more emotionally removed and objective, to ignore the strong circumstantial evidence pointing away from that scenario, and towards an impulsive crime of opportunity, date rape gone wrong.   Even if Joran is guilty, which I have no doubt he is, getting locked into the idea that she was drugged, as part of planned abduction and rape by all three suspects, takes you down the wrong path when it comes to such things as determining the most likely crime scene and cause of death.  It has I think even prevented the family from most effectively countering the attacks on Natalee... I suspect that the reason her family has never mentioned the incident of Natalee objecting to the nudity in the DVD that Satish put on, even tho it shows how Joran has been intentionally omitting details that don't fit the nutty/slutty image of Natalee he has been trying to portray, is that it also doesn't fit the idea that Natalee was a helpless prisoner or that she thought she was in a cab.  And furthermore if she was drugged, that leaves open the theoretical possibility that she would have consented to sex with Joran alone.  I've seen many comments by people who believe that Joran is guilty or are on the fence, to the effect of  "maybe she did want Joran, but not 2K as well..."  OTOH, if the truth is that 2K were just the drivers who dropped Joran and Natalee off at the beach together,  and then Natalee died fighting against Joran alone (which is what I have concluded is the scenario most consistent with the evidence), that proves that Beth was basically right about who her daughter was, even with inhibitions lowered by intoxication, Natalee would not have consented to sex with a stranger.  So ironically the dogmatic belief on the part of most family supporters that this must have been a planned drugging/abduction/gang rape may actually be depriving Natalee of the moral credit she deserves.


Shizaru,

I know you believe in your theory and I think that's great because you have devoted a lot of time to it.  But I disagree with it.  I do feel that Natalee was drugged, kidnapped and gang raped by all three.  Joran was in a rush to get to CnC's that night and only a half hour before closing.  My question is why even bother to go.  Does Joran think he is that irresistible that he would score with Natalee in that time frame?  He went there with a plan (20 times before) and he followed through with it.  She could have voluntarily gotten in the car with them thinking she was getting into a cab and going back to her hotel.  Once they made that first wrong turn it becomes a kidnapping thus all the excuses he makes about her wanting to drive around and seeing the lighthouse.  Van der Straaten also knows it was a kidnapping and this is why he made the family take the signs down and say "Missing".  He is trying to eliminate those charges against Joran in case they either found Natalee or found out what happened to her.  In my eyes Natalee isn't deprived of anything because of what I believe in.  JMO.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #522 9/10 - 9/12/2006
Post by: Kat_Gram on September 10, 2006, 11:30:54 AM
Shizaru has spent more time than I have on these statements.
Heart and soul has been put into this by Shizaru. Probably like the rest of us, some sleep lost. Tears shed. Anger outbursts.
We are all really on the same path... to find Justice for Natalee.
I am going to make the effort ( again ) to not be critical.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #522 9/10 - 9/12/2006
Post by: Smish on September 10, 2006, 11:33:00 AM
Quote from: "Buckeye"
Shizaru

I believe there was and probably still is an island passtime of hooking up with young American tourists the night before they are to leave.  I think the locals know that most have one last celebration and that it is a good time to take advantage. I do not believe Natalee had her eyes on Joran to play any silly game.  Deepak says after asking him to dance, she joined a group of her friends.  I can envision Natalee asking everyone to come on and dance (to celebrate their last night). I don't think she set out for him or she would have been hanging on him at the casino. She was not playing some teenage girl game.  She was played .  Nothing this bad might have happened before...but the game was well established.  I am not sure if you are aware that you are coming across as implying that Natalee asked for trouble.  I don't believe this and I am somewhat offended that what happened is being related to a female character flaw or lack of character.  Trusting young (naive) women don't see danger in friendliness...there are dangerous and ugly people in all age groups.  Please don't imply Natalee had anything to do with what happened.  She never saw the plan or knew she was the game. JMO

I don't think Shiz was implying that somehow this could have been Natalee's fault.I don't see it as that anyway.I also don't think that even IF Natalee went willingly with Joran that that made her a bad girl.Natalee was not a bad girl,just a normal young lady having fun on Aruba.I agree with you Buckeye,this was a PIMP game played many times on Aruba.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #522 9/10 - 9/12/2006
Post by: Kat_Gram on September 10, 2006, 11:37:52 AM
Smish....bare bumski is missing ...


Title: Lively Case Discussion #522 9/10 - 9/12/2006
Post by: Smish on September 10, 2006, 11:45:57 AM
Quote from: "San"
Quote from: "Shizaru"
In addition to Natalee's initiating contact with Joran and flirting with him at the bar, after ignoring him at the casino, the comments by Deepak in his 5/31 statement, that she told Deepak to drive around, and called out some boy's name from the car, are support for my theory that she left with Joran in part based on some sort of typical teenage agenda: Trying to make another boy jealous, or impress her friends, or something like that.  It certainly looks as tho she wanted to be seen leaving with Joran.  

Of course I understand why her parents prefer to believe that she was drugged and that despite being drunk and naive, she would not have gotten in a car with strangers.  However in truth it does a disservice to the family, for those of us who are more emotionally removed and objective, to ignore the strong circumstantial evidence pointing away from that scenario, and towards an impulsive crime of opportunity, date rape gone wrong.   Even if Joran is guilty, which I have no doubt he is, getting locked into the idea that she was drugged, as part of planned abduction and rape by all three suspects, takes you down the wrong path when it comes to such things as determining the most likely crime scene and cause of death.  It has I think even prevented the family from most effectively countering the attacks on Natalee... I suspect that the reason her family has never mentioned the incident of Natalee objecting to the nudity in the DVD that Satish put on, even tho it shows how Joran has been intentionally omitting details that don't fit the nutty/slutty image of Natalee he has been trying to portray, is that it also doesn't fit the idea that Natalee was a helpless prisoner or that she thought she was in a cab.  And furthermore if she was drugged, that leaves open the theoretical possibility that she would have consented to sex with Joran alone.  I've seen many comments by people who believe that Joran is guilty or are on the fence, to the effect of  "maybe she did want Joran, but not 2K as well..."  OTOH, if the truth is that 2K were just the drivers who dropped Joran and Natalee off at the beach together,  and then Natalee died fighting against Joran alone (which is what I have concluded is the scenario most consistent with the evidence), that proves that Beth was basically right about who her daughter was, even with inhibitions lowered by intoxication, Natalee would not have consented to sex with a stranger.  So ironically the dogmatic belief on the part of most family supporters that this must have been a planned drugging/abduction/gang rape may actually be depriving Natalee of the moral credit she deserves.


Shizaru,

I know you believe in your theory and I think that's great because you have devoted a lot of time to it.  But I disagree with it.  I do feel that Natalee was drugged, kidnapped and gang raped by all three.  Joran was in a rush to get to CnC's that night and only a half hour before closing.  My question is why even bother to go.  Does Joran think he is that irresistible that he would score with Natalee in that time frame?  He went there with a plan (20 times before) and he followed through with it.  She could have voluntarily gotten in the car with them thinking she was getting into a cab and going back to her hotel.  Once they made that first wrong turn it becomes a kidnapping thus all the excuses he makes about her wanting to drive around and seeing the lighthouse. Van der Straaten also knows it was a kidnapping and this is why he made the family take the signs down and say "Missing".  He is trying to eliminate those charges against Joran in case they either found Natalee or found out what happened to her. In my eyes Natalee isn't deprived of anything because of what I believe in.  JMO.

Thanks San,I had forgotten all about those missing and kidnapped posters and why they changed so quickly.I agree with you.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #522 9/10 - 9/12/2006
Post by: Kat_Gram on September 10, 2006, 11:50:44 AM
I was looking at Dave's book and on page 150, bottom, he talks about Paulus:
" a on-time-judge-in-training who flunked out and went back to Holland with his tail between his legs. As of right now, this man can no longer do anyone any favors, at least where the court system is concerned.  A person who sits on the bench has alot of power to wield. But now he has been dethroned. "
.
Well, I hope so. And I also hope that the Dutch Team has no friends or family on Aruba.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #522 9/10 - 9/12/2006
Post by: Tylergal on September 10, 2006, 11:58:47 AM
San, I agree with you and I think they do not want to be involved with "drugs" or "kidnapping" although they know that is what they did.  I do believe this was a PIMPS game, and I think Satish and Joran are more involved perhaps than Deepak, but he knows what happened, although he might not be aware of where her body was taken in the end.  She died because three lower-than-scum-sucking predators took her in a car where she met her demise.  It's just as simple as 1-2-3 + Paulus makes 4.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #522 9/10 - 9/12/2006
Post by: San on September 10, 2006, 12:00:25 PM
Quote from: "Tylergal"
San, I agree with you and I think they do not want to be involved with "drugs" or "kidnapping" although they know that is what they did.  I do believe this was a PIMPS game, and I think Satish and Joran are more involved perhaps than Deepak, but he knows what happened, although he might not be aware of where her body was taken in the end.  She died because three lower-than-scum-sucking predators took her in a car where she met her demise.  It's just as simple as 1-2-3 + Paulus makes 4.

Exactly.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #522 9/10 - 9/12/2006
Post by: Smish on September 10, 2006, 12:04:06 PM
Quote from: "Kat_Gram"
I was looking at Dave's book and on page 150, bottom, he talks about Paulus:
" a on-time-judge-in-training who flunked out and went back to Holland with his tail between his legs. As of right now, this man can no longer do anyone any favors, at least where the court system is concerned.  A person who sits on the bench has alot of power to wield. But now he has been dethroned. "
.
Well, I hope so. And I also hope that the Dutch Team has no friends or family on Aruba.


True but Paulus knows people in the court system,has friends in high places,long ago made friends.I trust no one on Aruba except for Jossy.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #522 9/10 - 9/12/2006
Post by: BTgirl on September 10, 2006, 12:08:51 PM
I put Google Earth on my computer the other day, and last night I was looking at Aruba. From the air, that whole place looks like a Gosh-forsaken heck hole.

Except for that one strip of hotels, it all looks like a vast wasteland. Could someone tell me again why the place is supposed to be an island paradise?


Title: Lively Case Discussion #522 9/10 - 9/12/2006
Post by: San on September 10, 2006, 12:10:10 PM
Quote from: "BTgirl"
I put Google Earth on my computer the other day, and last night I was looking at Aruba. From the air, that whole place looks like a Gosh-forsaken heck hole.

Except for that one strip of hotels, it all looks like a vast wasteland. Could someone tell me again why the place is supposed to be an island paradise?

Because Aruba is saying it is :roll:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #522 9/10 - 9/12/2006
Post by: BTgirl on September 10, 2006, 12:12:23 PM
Quote from: "San"
Quote from: "BTgirl"
I put Google Earth on my computer the other day, and last night I was looking at Aruba. From the air, that whole place looks like a Gosh-forsaken heck hole.

Except for that one strip of hotels, it all looks like a vast wasteland. Could someone tell me again why the place is supposed to be an island paradise?

Because Aruba is saying it is :roll:


Well, we already know big people lie.  :lol:

Seriously, if you look at a green island like Bermuda, and then compare it to Aruba, the difference is very striking. Aruba looks like it got bombed and never recovered.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #522 9/10 - 9/12/2006
Post by: Tylergal on September 10, 2006, 12:15:35 PM
Quote from: "BTgirl"
I put Google Earth on my computer the other day, and last night I was looking at Aruba. From the air, that whole place looks like a Gosh-forsaken heck hole.

Except for that one strip of hotels, it all looks like a vast wasteland. Could someone tell me again why the place is supposed to be an island paradise?


BT, I thought the same thing when I went there.  It was for sale cheap and those wanting to turn it into predator/smuggling island, named "it paradise," because it is a paradise for thugs.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #522 9/10 - 9/12/2006
Post by: San on September 10, 2006, 12:17:21 PM
Quote from: "BTgirl"
Quote from: "San"
Quote from: "BTgirl"
I put Google Earth on my computer the other day, and last night I was looking at Aruba. From the air, that whole place looks like a Gosh-forsaken heck hole.

Except for that one strip of hotels, it all looks like a vast wasteland. Could someone tell me again why the place is supposed to be an island paradise?

Because Aruba is saying it is :roll:


Well, we already know big people lie.  :lol:

Seriously, if you look at a green island like Bermuda, and then compare it to Aruba, the difference is very striking. Aruba looks like it got bombed and never recovered.

I like your discription BT.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #522 9/10 - 9/12/2006
Post by: San on September 10, 2006, 12:19:11 PM
Quote from: "Tylergal"
Quote from: "BTgirl"
I put Google Earth on my computer the other day, and last night I was looking at Aruba. From the air, that whole place looks like a Gosh-forsaken heck hole.

Except for that one strip of hotels, it all looks like a vast wasteland. Could someone tell me again why the place is supposed to be an island paradise?


BT, I thought the same thing when I went there.  It was for sale cheap and those wanting to turn it into predator/smuggling island, named "it paradise," because it is a paradise for thugs.

Gee I like this description also :lol:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #522 9/10 - 9/12/2006
Post by: Kat_Gram on September 10, 2006, 12:20:13 PM
That whole tourist beach area is man made.
There wasn't any industry on Aruba pre tourists... there was the oil refinery ... and aloe.
There isn't the lush foliage that you associate with tropical.
Hardly rains.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #522 9/10 - 9/12/2006
Post by: Smish on September 10, 2006, 12:30:49 PM
Quote from: "Kat_Gram"
Smish....bare bumski is missing ...


Waaaa,my post to you went poof.
Good morning again you all,Kat,I was trying to get my neat looking flutterby pic inserted...kept resizing it down past 100x100 and inserting and reinserting it but it wouldn't work.It was gonna replace my dancing bumski pic.
I like changing my pics often,you should see my desk top.
:)


Title: Lively Case Discussion #522 9/10 - 9/12/2006
Post by: Shizaru on September 10, 2006, 12:32:56 PM
I certainly was not suggesting that Natalee was in any way to blame.  The reason it matters why she got in the car, whether she was willing or drugged, is that her condition and state of mind is relevant to what occured after that, where they took her and how she died.  I think that she got in the car willingly, because her judgement was seriously impaired by alcohol.  I don't think she knew what kind of effect a 151 shot would have on someone her size.  I think she knew she was getting into a private vehicle, not likely she'd mistake a car parked behind the building for a cab.  However I don't think she expected anything more when she got in the car, than a ride back to her hotel with maybe some making out on the way.  Maybe she thought Joran was cute and wanted a little romance on her last night on the island, maybe she was trying to make some MBer jealous, maybe it was both.  Either way I think she was a good girl who trusted the wrong person and paid for it with her life.  I don't think this was a planned crime tho.  If that is the case why were 2K Joran's third choice?  Are Andre and Florencia part of the rape gang too?  And why were 2K giving away that they weren't cab drivers by coming in and drinking with Joran?  Frankly this "20 times before quote" is being used dishonestly.  Joran was not saying they had committed rape 20 times before, just that they had picked up tourist girls 20 times before.  I think the plan that night was the same as the other 20 times,  find some drunk tourist girls, have Joran get them even drunker by buying them some 151 shots, then offer them a ride back to their hotel and see what happened.  Maybe I'm wrong but I think there is far too much uniformity of opinion on the pro-family boards that this was a premediated abduction by a well-organized pimp squad, the alternative that it was a crime of opportunity doesn't even get 5% as much attention.  Which is unfortunate because there is certainly plenty of circumstantial evidence pointing to the latter, and which sort of crime it was makes a difference as to which scenarios are more plausable when trying to determine what ultimately happened to her.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #522 9/10 - 9/12/2006
Post by: San on September 10, 2006, 12:42:36 PM
Karin Janssen herself was the one who brought premeditation into the picture.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #522 9/10 - 9/12/2006
Post by: BTgirl on September 10, 2006, 12:50:08 PM
Quote from: "San"
Karin Janssen herself was the one who brought premeditation into the picture.


Hey San - I like your sig line.  :lol:

I probably should know this, but who decided to make Aruba be a tourist mecca and when?


Title: Lively Case Discussion #522 9/10 - 9/12/2006
Post by: mrs. red on September 10, 2006, 12:52:09 PM
hi Monkeys... going to read back... brb


Title: Lively Case Discussion #522 9/10 - 9/12/2006
Post by: yapperz1 on September 10, 2006, 12:59:23 PM
Hiya Monkeys


Title: Lively Case Discussion #522 9/10 - 9/12/2006
Post by: mrs. red on September 10, 2006, 12:59:23 PM
Quote from: "Tylergal"
Morning, Monkeys.  Lots of theories and speculation going on and so much of it seems so plausible.  I think the truth would have put all the theories to rest, but I think SunFreak might be onto something.  Is this not when they were "driving fast?"  I think that was when they had a very seriously injured or dead Natalee on their hands.

CALL OUT TO MRS. RED:  There must be Waffle House's in the Northeast.  I saw the website of John Kerry's girlfriend and the theme song was by John Kerry, and he was singing, "I get my women at the waffle house."


Sunfreak - I have decided that they ran over her... it makes, in my mind, the most sense for a lot of things.

Tyler
, I promise I have never, ever seen one.... and Red and I drive all over the place.... LOL.  Kerry is just trying to "play" to the South...  :lol:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #522 9/10 - 9/12/2006
Post by: BTgirl on September 10, 2006, 01:02:22 PM
Quote from: "yapperz1"
Hiya Monkeys


Hi Yapperz. Did you see I'm famous now? San is quoting me.  :P


Title: Lively Case Discussion #522 9/10 - 9/12/2006
Post by: yapperz1 on September 10, 2006, 01:03:20 PM
BT, I saw that   :shock:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #522 9/10 - 9/12/2006
Post by: sandy leiva on September 10, 2006, 01:04:58 PM
Quote from: "mrs. red"
Quote from: "Tylergal"
Morning, Monkeys.  Lots of theories and speculation going on and so much of it seems so plausible.  I think the truth would have put all the theories to rest, but I think SunFreak might be onto something.  Is this not when they were "driving fast?"  I think that was when they had a very seriously injured or dead Natalee on their hands.

CALL OUT TO MRS. RED:  There must be Waffle House's in the Northeast.  I saw the website of John Kerry's girlfriend and the theme song was by John Kerry, and he was singing, "I get my women at the waffle house."


Sunfreak - I have decided that they ran over her... it makes, in my mind, the most sense for a lot of things.

Tyler
, I promise I have never, ever seen one.... and Red and I drive all over the place.... LOL.  Kerry is just trying to "play" to the South...  :lol:
 




morning monkeys and Mrs Red  

Giario has put up the diario forum which has natalee holloway topics funny that it was started last yr yet no one knew of it till now   will past it below

 
 
Diario Forum Index :: FAQ :: Search :: Memberlist :: Usergroups  Register :: Log in :: Profile  
 


Log in to check your private messages

NATALEE HOLLOWAY
Goto page 1, 2, 3 ... 10, 11, 12  Next
   
       Diario Forum Index // News Comments
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
Angelalala



Joined: 23 Aug 2006
Posts: 12

 Posted: Wed Aug 23, 2006 1:13 pm    Post subject: NATALEE HOLLOWAY  
 
 
 
I give up. I didn't mean to incite so much hate. I'm sorry.

Last edited by Angelalala on Mon Sep 04, 2006 12:21 am; edited 1 time in total
 
Back to top    
 
 
Guest






 Posted: Wed Aug 23, 2006 6:26 pm    Post subject: Natalee Ann Holloway  
 
 
 
I find it strange that this forum was "formed" in July 2005. 1 month after Natalee went "missing" and yet, no one has used this forum except for 1 or 2 people and this forum is from Aruba. Thank you Diario for furnishing this forum and making it available for everyone to use.

For the last 15 months it could have been utilized to help in finding the truth of what happened to Natalee. SOMEONE in Aruba knows what happened but for reasons beyond our knowledge or imagination, that person or people, have withheld this information. WHY? Doesn't the family of Natalee deserve to know what and where their daughter is? Doesn't the good people of Aruba deserve to know?

If it were your daughter, sister, mother or another family member or friend, wouldn't you want these answers? It is not humane for a person to not let Natalee's fate be known. If you know the answers, is this something that you want to live with the rest of your life?

It would be more honorable to reveal what you know to these parents than to keep this information to yourselves. Remember, there is reward money to the person that helps this family. It will be done confidentially. You don't have to give your name. You can work with someone as a mediator. It can be done in the strictest confidence.

Remove this burden from your life, if you do know what happened. Be a hero! Be a silent hero, if you must. Give yourself some peace of mind but please, just give this family of Natalee Ann Holloway some closure of where she is or what has happened.

This whole situation could have been avoided if the truth had been told in the beginning. Too many people have been hurt because of this. The good people of Aruba have been hurt also, not just Natalee and her family. Did we, the USA want this for them? No! Everything was fine between these 2 great countries before this. What happened? Who caused this? Not the USA, but the people or person who caused harm to Natalee. As a result, you will find bitterness between some people, which was not there before. Bitterness and hateful remarks are becoming more and more obvious in blogs on the internet and in our own neighborhoods and countries.

I am sad to say, that the relationship between these 2 countries will never be the same again until these questions are answered. Sure, Aruba will still have some visitors come from the USA but then again, there will not be as many. There is no official boycott of Aruba. Just individual ones, that some people in support of Natalee and her family have chosen to take, until Natalee is either found or some honest person comes forward and tells the truth of what really did happen.

This case of Natalee Holloway will not go away for some of us here in the USA. Never!! The good hard working, deserving citizens of Aruba, will be the ones to suffer for it. I am sad to say this. It isn't fair to Natalee's family or for these people in Aruba either. Life will not be the same as it was before Natalee went missing. One person CAN make the difference. Are YOU, reading this, that ONE person? Or with what you may know, can you live with the knowledge of what happened, the rest of your life? Are you willing to live with this cancer that will eat at your heart, the rest of your life?

I personally never had the privilege of meeting Natalee but it seems now, that I have known her all of her life. Her life, has now become a part of so many other people's lives. She will never be forgotten, nor will the quest to find her, by so many people end. This is one missing person case, that will never be forgotten.

The people who have stayed faithful in this quest with her family, will not let Natalee be forgotten. There are too many people behind them and we will always be searching for the answers in Aruba. That is where the answers lie. One small Island with so much to offer. One small Island and someone knows where and what those answers are. One small Island with a thorn in it's side, now.  

Are YOU that someone that has the answers?? Do the right thing...

Sincerely, Jamie
Alabama, USA
 
Back to top  
 
 
Jamie



Joined: 23 Aug 2006
Posts: 13
Location: USA
 Posted: Wed Aug 23, 2006 6:33 pm    Post subject: Natalee Ann Holloway  
 
 
 
The above message was posted by myself, Jamie. It was not meant to have "guest" applied, as to confuse anyone. I take sole responsibility for it's contents.

Jamie
_________________
findnatalee@juno.com INFORMATION OR KNOW WHERE NATALEE IS
$1,000,000 FOR INFORMATION LEADING TO HER SAFE RETURN
$250,000 FOR INFORMATION THAT ULTIMATELY HELPS SOLVE THIS MISSING PERSON CASE.

http://www.allpointsbulletin.org/Natalee_Holloway.html
 
Back to top    
 
 
kescah
Guest





 Posted: Wed Aug 23, 2006 7:40 pm    Post subject: This Forum  
 
 
 
How nice to find this forum here. We want to have a voice in Aruba to speak and hear more about the Natalee Holloway case and anything connected to it. Thank you, Diario, for this opportunity.

Please keep us informed. Most of us do not read Papamiento or Dutch, so we miss a lot of what is said.

Again, thanks.
 
Back to top  
 
 
flash



Joined: 23 Aug 2006
Posts: 1

 Posted: Wed Aug 23, 2006 10:57 pm    Post subject:    
 
 
 
Very nice to see Jossy has a forum to go with his paper. Seems like he is the only one out there that actually cares what is happening. I say horray for Diario, and keep the information coming. Would love to hear some kind of news soon, it has been very quiet.  
 
Back to top    
 
 
Stefani
Guest





 Posted: Thu Aug 24, 2006 12:07 am    Post subject: Go Jossy Go  
 
 
 
The truth lies in Aruba. We can only hope that Jossy and the Dario can help bring the truth forward for the family. Jossy's dedication to Natalee's story is encouraging and appreciated. Keep digging.  
 
Back to top  
 
 
Jamie



Joined: 23 Aug 2006
Posts: 13
Location: USA
 Posted: Thu Aug 24, 2006 1:33 am    Post subject:    
 
 
 
I wanted to thank all of you for finding your way and coming here today. I found this forum by chance today and have tried to spread the word of it's existence. This forum had been started last July 2005 but no one had used it. Hopefully someone may offer some help in finding the truth about Natalee.

Lets please don't make this a bashing forum against anyone. This is NOT my blog or forum and I am not an administrator. Diario provided it and I only helped it come alive. Let's see where it goes from here.

Jamie
_________________
findnatalee@juno.com INFORMATION OR KNOW WHERE NATALEE IS
$1,000,000 FOR INFORMATION LEADING TO HER SAFE RETURN
$250,000 FOR INFORMATION THAT ULTIMATELY HELPS SOLVE THIS MISSING PERSON CASE.

http://www.allpointsbulletin.org/Natalee_Holloway.html

Last edited by Jamie on Thu Aug 31, 2006 2:47 am; edited 1 time in total
 
Back to top    
 
 
ICDucks



Joined: 24 Aug 2006
Posts: 1

 Posted: Thu Aug 24, 2006 1:38 pm    Post subject:    
 
 
 
Thanks to Jossy for providing this forum.

To the people of Aruba:
It is evident that your island is suffering because of this case. In my heart I feel bad for the working people of your island who have family to support. Please help bring this case to a conclusion. Natalee's family deserves to have truthful answers and we want to see justice in this case.
I urge you to post any information concerning the Holloway case. People talk, you may have heard something over the past year that may seem like nothing, or gossip, but you never know what little bit of truth might be included. If you know or have heard anything that may be important, please post. Thank you.
 
Back to top    
 
 
SunBear
Guest





 Posted: Thu Aug 24, 2006 4:07 pm    Post subject: Holloway  
 
 
 
I do hope that Jossy and the honest people of Aruba will find their way through the maze of lies so the family of Natalee Holloway will know the truth and justice will be served. Thank you Jossy, for this forum (and thanks to the friend who pointed me here), and may God bless you and yours.
 
Back to top  
 
 
Aristotle
Guest





 Posted: Thu Aug 24, 2006 4:59 pm    Post subject: Tips and Info needed  
 
 
 
For anyone with information who does not know, the reward money $$$$$ is still available. $250,000.00 US for information leading to Natalee's whereabouts, and $1,000,000.00 US for her safe return. If you have information and would like to confidentially provide it to the family, please let me know and I can put you in contact. Thanks in advance.
 
Back to top  
 
 
LindaK
Guest





 Posted: Thu Aug 24, 2006 6:46 pm    Post subject:    
 
 
 
We will ALL remain voices for Natalee. We will ALL search until Justice is served.

Please, it only takes ONE TRUTH. Natalee's family deserves that TRUTH, they deserve to know what happened.
 
Back to top  
 
 
Mr. Justice
Guest





 Posted: Thu Aug 24, 2006 9:10 pm    Post subject:    
 
 
 
Support Natalee, her family and justice!

http://www.petitiononline.com/justnat/petition.html
 
Back to top  
 
 
Jamie



Joined: 23 Aug 2006
Posts: 13
Location: USA
 Posted: Fri Aug 25, 2006 12:13 am    Post subject:    
 
 
 
I am posting a special and separate e-mail address here, for anyone who has any information as to where Natalee is, or what may have happened to her. This is a secure, private home e-mail address of mine, that I have set up today and will not be used for my personal use except to correspond with you, if you have any information. Your identity WILL remain confidential. I am assuring you of this. Any information concerning the disappearance of Natalee Ann Holloway that you have to offer, WILL also be kept in the strictest confidence. I am not in the law enforcement or of any other government official status. I am a mother, sister, grandmother, just an average person, like so many others around this world, that this young lady's disappearance has effected so deeply. It has touched our hearts, souls and lives since the day she went missing. Those of us that care so much for Natalee and her entire family will never give up the Hope For Natalee.

Someone in Aruba OR the USA knows exactly what happened to this beautiful young lady. It could very well be that YOU are scared and at this point, don't know WHO to trust with what you may know. I understand this. I am offering to be a mediator between YOU and the PROPER authority. Please, rest assure that your information and identity WILL be protected. The only thing that will change is that YOU will have cleared your conscience and Natalee's family will have the answers they need. This family has gone through enough, for too long and we only want them to finally have peace. I pray that Natalee is still alive and that maybe someone is holding her against her will, and that whoever has her, will let her go home. But, if this is not true, then they especially need closure. This is breaking their hearts, of not knowing what has happened to their daughter. I don't know how they get through each day. I have never lost a child but to lose one and then not even know where she is, has to be the worst thing in your life to endure. I can not even imagine what all they are going through and I can't even pretend to know. I don't know how the people or persons responsible for Natalee's disappearance can even live with their self each day, knowing what they have done to this child.

The e-mail address that I have given is only for information that someone may have. It is NOT being seen or used by anyone other than myself. This is a direct link between YOU and myself ONLY. I am very sincere and honest! I want YOU to know that YOU will NEVER be identified to the public at anytime and no one will ever know that YOU had the courage to provide the information and answers that Natalee's dear family so desperately needs. The only connection between myself and Natalee is that we both live in the state of Alabama and I have a child her same age. And the fact that I care so deeply for this family and for them to know what happened to their daughter. Like so many others, there is not a day that goes by that I don't think of Natalee.

To anyone who may try to play games with me, at this e-mail address and send me things out of hate or spite, be aware now that your return address will be blocked. I will NOT tolerate your selfish and cruel behavior that I have seen or heard about from some of the blogs and forums out there. This is a real person's life we are talking about. Please have the human decency and give Natalee's family this respect. You would not want someone to do that to you, if your child was missing. Please really think about that.

Please come forward...Let's end this now. It has gone on for too long and so many innocent people are being hurt. It will not stop until YOU do what you know is RIGHT, in your heart. It is speaking to you now. The search for Natalee will continue until she is either found OR until those responsible have been found and the truth is known. The person and the name, Natalee Ann Holloway will forever be associated with ALL involved in her disappearance IF the truth is never told. She may not ever be found but we will never let her be forgotten.

I, and many others are pleading with YOU to find it in your heart to come forward now.

Sincerely,
Jamie

findnatalee@juno.com
_________________
findnatalee@juno.com INFORMATION OR KNOW WHERE NATALEE IS
$1,000,000 FOR INFORMATION LEADING TO HER SAFE RETURN
$250,000 FOR INFORMATION THAT ULTIMATELY HELPS SOLVE THIS MISSING PERSON CASE.

http://www.allpointsbulletin.org/Natalee_Holloway.html
 
Back to top    
 
 
Boots



Joined: 23 Aug 2006
Posts: 1

 Posted: Fri Aug 25, 2006 8:08 am    Post subject:    
 
 
 
Thank you Jossy! Your hard work is appreciated. We will find Natalee and bring her home. Thank's for all that you do.

Boots
 
Back to top    
 
 
Jamie



Joined: 23 Aug 2006
Posts: 13
Location: USA
 Posted: Fri Aug 25, 2006 3:06 pm    Post subject: One child DOES make a difference  
 
 
 
 




By Elisa Waldron
Aug 24 2006 05:06PM

http://www.associatedcontent.com/article/53120/the_worth_of_a_child_missing_children.html


Below are only parts of a story that Elisa Waldron wrote. Please take the time to read the entire letter at the link above. This letter has come straight from this ladies heart. Not only does it tell of Natalee Holloway but of others that have been murdered or missing. Please read the story below and ask yourself. Can just ONE child make the difference? What if it was YOUR child?


Natalee Holloway was an 18 year old honor student with a scholarship to the University of Alabama waiting for her when she disappeared on May 30, 2005. She was enjoying the paradise that is Aruba with her senior class when she walked out of a bar one night and into international headlines.
I have been watching this mystery through the eyes of a parent; I have two teenagers. I am easily able to feel a sense of horror, loss, fear and disbelief at that thought of a missing child. We like to believe that we can protect our children from harm. We have to believe that once our children leave our care the teachers, the other parents, the bus drivers, the religious leaders, the law enforcement officials…EVERYBODY is looking out for them. To be able to let our children grow up, to be able to confidently wave goodbye and maybe even tell our children “it will be okay”, we have to let go of our own fears and trust in God and all the other people on the planet.

The sad truth is that all the other people on the planet are not trustworthy. They do not all have the same goals or the same ideas of honesty and they certainly do not all love our children the way we do. I admire Beth Twitty so much. I really do. As Natalee’s mother it was she who kept her face and Natalee’s name in the news, in the headlines, at the water cooler. It was she who kept pressing the Aruba officials to, for God’s sake, do something. She was forced to trust what was being done, that it was being done correctly and that because a judge was involved that it wasn’t “Oh, it’s you, Judge…so sorry to have bothered you. Please, have a donut. You can go.”

Not only did she rush to the site of her daughter’s disappearance thousands of miles away, she remained firm and steadfast and able to lead the crusade into the details, the reconstruction of that night. She has said she is aware of sexual abuse against her daughter on that night. I am not sure how well I would handle hearing my baby was raped before she disappeared and where I would find the composure to keep standing in front of the cameras to do interviews and to keep telling the world my daughter is a person, please don’t forget her, please don’t let the bad people in the world know that one child will not matter.

I saw her on television explaining that young girls go missing on Aruba and are sold as sex slaves. I was wondering where she got her composure and understanding her hope that Natalee was still alive somewhere – anywhere—and hoping she would just be found and could go home again.

What I find interesting is that, in fact, one child does indeed matter.

What I would like to see are more people giving more time and effort into doing what they can to help others like themselves. Others who also work to provide for their family’s needs and who are faltering in the worst moment of their lives. The moment they realize their child is missing…the moment policemen knock on their doors to tell them their child is dead. What I would like us all to remember is that it could be us. It could be me tomorrow. It could be you. In your worst moment, wouldn’t you like to be able to look around and realize one child makes a difference? My child matters.


 


YES, one child does matter!!

Give Beth Holloway Twitty back her child, please!
_________________
findnatalee@juno.com INFORMATION OR KNOW WHERE NATALEE IS
$1,000,000 FOR INFORMATION LEADING TO HER SAFE RETURN
$250,000 FOR INFORMATION THAT ULTIMATELY HELPS SOLVE THIS MISSING PERSON CASE.

http://www.allpointsbulletin.org/Natalee_Holloway.html

Last edited by Jamie on Wed Aug 30, 2006 1:24 am; edited 1 time in total
 
Back to top    
 
 
Display posts from previous: All Posts1 Day7 Days2 Weeks1 Month3 Months6 Months1 Year Oldest FirstNewest First  
 
       Diario Forum Index // News Comments All times are GMT - 6 Hours
Goto page 1, 2, 3 ... 10, 11, 12  Next  
Page 1 of 12

 
 Jump to: Select a forum Aruba News----------------News Comments  

You can post new topics in this forum
You can reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
 


 
 
Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2002 phpBB Group


Title: Lively Case Discussion #522 9/10 - 9/12/2006
Post by: BTgirl on September 10, 2006, 01:05:20 PM
Quote from: "yapperz1"
BT, I saw that   :shock:


Who knew?  :wink:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #522 9/10 - 9/12/2006
Post by: mrs. red on September 10, 2006, 01:06:58 PM
Quote from: "Shizaru"
In addition to Natalee's initiating contact with Joran and flirting with him at the bar, after ignoring him at the casino, the comments by Deepak in his 5/31 statement, that she told Deepak to drive around, and called out some boy's name from the car, are support for my theory that she left with Joran in part based on some sort of typical teenage agenda: Trying to make another boy jealous, or impress her friends, or something like that.  It certainly looks as tho she wanted to be seen leaving with Joran.  

Of course I understand why her parents prefer to believe that she was drugged and that despite being drunk and naive, she would not have gotten in a car with strangers.  However in truth it does a disservice to the family, for those of us who are more emotionally removed and objective, to ignore the strong circumstantial evidence pointing away from that scenario, and towards an impulsive crime of opportunity, date rape gone wrong.   Even if Joran is guilty, which I have no doubt he is, getting locked into the idea that she was drugged, as part of planned abduction and rape by all three suspects, takes you down the wrong path when it comes to such things as determining the most likely crime scene and cause of death.  It has I think even prevented the family from most effectively countering the attacks on Natalee... I suspect that the reason her family has never mentioned the incident of Natalee objecting to the nudity in the DVD that Satish put on, even tho it shows how Joran has been intentionally omitting details that don't fit the nutty/slutty image of Natalee he has been trying to portray, is that it also doesn't fit the idea that Natalee was a helpless prisoner or that she thought she was in a cab.  And furthermore if she was drugged, that leaves open the theoretical possibility that she would have consented to sex with Joran alone.  I've seen many comments by people who believe that Joran is guilty or are on the fence, to the effect of  "maybe she did want Joran, but not 2K as well..."  OTOH, if the truth is that 2K were just the drivers who dropped Joran and Natalee off at the beach together,  and then Natalee died fighting against Joran alone (which is what I have concluded is the scenario most consistent with the evidence), that proves that Beth was basically right about who her daughter was, even with inhibitions lowered by intoxication, Natalee would not have consented to sex with a stranger.  So ironically the dogmatic belief on the part of most family supporters that this must have been a planned drugging/abduction/gang rape may actually be depriving Natalee of the moral credit she deserves.


Other than Joran and Deepak's statements - where have we ever heard that Natalee flirted with Joran?  I have seen pictures posted that show she was already dancing with another boy...Joran is NOT a delicious anything... so why would she even acknowledge him at CnC's if she hadn't at the casino? Also, by Joran's own admission he was after another MB girl.... I think they drugged Natalee because she was there at the moment of opportunity....

As for the disagreement regarding Natalee being drugged, even Jossy says quite plainly for $20 the bartenders will drug the drinks. Joran said that he paid $20 for the drinks, that could just be semantics.... I paid $20 for the drinks could also mean  - I paid $20 for each drink....


Title: Lively Case Discussion #522 9/10 - 9/12/2006
Post by: klaasend on September 10, 2006, 01:08:20 PM
Quote from: "mrs. red"
Quote from: "Tylergal"
Morning, Monkeys.  Lots of theories and speculation going on and so much of it seems so plausible.  I think the truth would have put all the theories to rest, but I think SunFreak might be onto something.  Is this not when they were "driving fast?"  I think that was when they had a very seriously injured or dead Natalee on their hands.

CALL OUT TO MRS. RED:  There must be Waffle House's in the Northeast.  I saw the website of John Kerry's girlfriend and the theme song was by John Kerry, and he was singing, "I get my women at the waffle house."


Sunfreak - I have decided that they ran over her... it makes, in my mind, the most sense for a lot of things.

Tyler
, I promise I have never, ever seen one.... and Red and I drive all over the place.... LOL.  Kerry is just trying to "play" to the South...  :lol:


Waffle House - you can pick your state and it will tell you how many stores.

http://www.wafflehouse.com/default.asp

Hi All!


Title: Lively Case Discussion #522 9/10 - 9/12/2006
Post by: BTgirl on September 10, 2006, 01:09:58 PM
Thank you, Sandy Leiva


Title: Lively Case Discussion #522 9/10 - 9/12/2006
Post by: Spock on September 10, 2006, 01:13:48 PM
Quote from: "San"
Karin Janssen herself was the one who brought premeditation into the picture.


She is legally correct, if you arrive at a bar thirty minutes before closing, buy a girl the equivalent of six drinks in thirty minutes, offer to drive her back to the hotel, she never gets there, and is never seen again, the subsequent crime is never considered accidental, it is legally a premeditated action. The crime is no longer a crime of opportunity, it is considered premeditated. Thus the suspicion of premeditated murder. The purpose of the liquor was the same as a narcotic: remove the girls ability to consent.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #522 9/10 - 9/12/2006
Post by: yapperz1 on September 10, 2006, 01:14:22 PM
Mrs Red.. I agree. Natalee showed no interest (to our knowledge) in JVDS. IMO he went to CnC's with an agenda. He knew exactly what to do, when to do it & how to do it.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #522 9/10 - 9/12/2006
Post by: San on September 10, 2006, 01:17:45 PM
Quote from: "yapperz1"
Mrs Red.. I agree. Natalee showed no interest (to our knowledge) in JVDS. IMO he went to CnC's with an agenda. He knew exactly what to do, when to do it & how to do it.

Exactly.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #522 9/10 - 9/12/2006
Post by: San on September 10, 2006, 01:19:55 PM
Quote from: "Spock"
Quote from: "San"
Karin Janssen herself was the one who brought premeditation into the picture.


She is legally correct, if you arrive at a bar thirty minutes before closing, buy a girl the equivalent of six drinks in thirty minutes, offer to drive her back to the hotel, she never gets there, and is never seen again, the subsequent crime is never considered accidental, it is legally a premeditated action. The crime is no longer a crime of opportunity, it is considered premeditated. Thus the suspicion of premeditated murder. The purpose of the liquor was the same as a narcotic: remove the girls ability to consent.

The premeditation charge was against Paulus.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #522 9/10 - 9/12/2006
Post by: mrs. red on September 10, 2006, 01:20:27 PM
Quote from: "klaasend"
Quote from: "mrs. red"
Quote from: "Tylergal"
Morning, Monkeys.  Lots of theories and speculation going on and so much of it seems so plausible.  I think the truth would have put all the theories to rest, but I think SunFreak might be onto something.  Is this not when they were "driving fast?"  I think that was when they had a very seriously injured or dead Natalee on their hands.

CALL OUT TO MRS. RED:  There must be Waffle House's in the Northeast.  I saw the website of John Kerry's girlfriend and the theme song was by John Kerry, and he was singing, "I get my women at the waffle house."


Sunfreak - I have decided that they ran over her... it makes, in my mind, the most sense for a lot of things.

Tyler
, I promise I have never, ever seen one.... and Red and I drive all over the place.... LOL.  Kerry is just trying to "play" to the South...  :lol:


Waffle House - you can pick your state and it will tell you how many stores.

http://www.wafflehouse.com/default.asp

Hi All!


I saw that... ME, CT, MA, RI, NH, NJ and NY are not even listed.... those are all my driving distance places.... and Red hates Waffle House... :shock:  he is all about Cracker Barrell... :lol:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #522 9/10 - 9/12/2006
Post by: klaasend on September 10, 2006, 01:20:59 PM
Quote from: "Spock"
Quote from: "San"
Karin Janssen herself was the one who brought premeditation into the picture.


She is legally correct, if you arrive at a bar thirty minutes before closing, buy a girl the equivalent of six drinks in thirty minutes, offer to drive her back to the hotel, she never gets there, and is never seen again, the subsequent crime is never considered accidental, it is legally a premeditated action. The crime is no longer a crime of opportunity, it is considered premeditated. Thus the suspicion of premeditated murder. The purpose of the liquor was the same as a narcotic: remove the girls ability to consent.


Wolf Hunting Tactics

Wolves are primarily nocturnal animals that avoid the heat of day. They generally commence hunting at dusk.

Wolves detect prey by three primary means, sent (most common), tracking, and chance encounters.

After prey is detected, wolves may split up to search through brush, travel on ridge tops searching for the prey below, or test herds looking for signs of weakness.

It has long been recognized that wolves often take advantage of weak members of the herd. In 1804, Captain Clark of the famed Lewis and Clark expedition wrote that prairie wolves followed buffalo and fed "on those that are killed by accident or those that are too pore or fat to keep up with the ganges."

Just thought this was an interresting comparison  :wink:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #522 9/10 - 9/12/2006
Post by: mrs. red on September 10, 2006, 01:22:59 PM
Quote from: "yapperz1"
Mrs Red.. I agree. Natalee showed no interest (to our knowledge) in JVDS. IMO he went to CnC's with an agenda. He knew exactly what to do, when to do it & how to do it.


and again I respectfully disagree with Shiz's assessement of the statement  about the 20 x before....


Title: Lively Case Discussion #522 9/10 - 9/12/2006
Post by: San on September 10, 2006, 01:23:44 PM
Quote from: "klaasend"
Quote from: "mrs. red"
Quote from: "Tylergal"
Morning, Monkeys.  Lots of theories and speculation going on and so much of it seems so plausible.  I think the truth would have put all the theories to rest, but I think SunFreak might be onto something.  Is this not when they were "driving fast?"  I think that was when they had a very seriously injured or dead Natalee on their hands.

CALL OUT TO MRS. RED:  There must be Waffle House's in the Northeast.  I saw the website of John Kerry's girlfriend and the theme song was by John Kerry, and he was singing, "I get my women at the waffle house."


Sunfreak - I have decided that they ran over her... it makes, in my mind, the most sense for a lot of things.

Tyler
, I promise I have never, ever seen one.... and Red and I drive all over the place.... LOL.  Kerry is just trying to "play" to the South...  :lol:


Waffle House - you can pick your state and it will tell you how many stores.

http://www.wafflehouse.com/default.asp

Hi All!

No wafflehouse around here :lol:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #522 9/10 - 9/12/2006
Post by: sandy leiva on September 10, 2006, 01:32:21 PM
Quote from: "BTgirl"
Thank you, Sandy Leiva


your very welcome monkey friends


Title: Lively Case Discussion #522 9/10 - 9/12/2006
Post by: Spock on September 10, 2006, 01:34:55 PM
I can't wait to see Joran's 5/31 witness statement. I have a feeling he mentioned a walk on the beach by the fisherman's huts.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #522 9/10 - 9/12/2006
Post by: klaasend on September 10, 2006, 01:39:19 PM
NEW FRONT PAGE POST:

Natalee Holloway Investigation: Satish Kalpoe’s 5-31-05 Witness Statement
http://www.scaredmonkeys.com/2006/09/10/natalee-holloway-investigation-satish-kalpoes-5-31-05-witness-statement/

Also added to the Important Case Document thread  :wink:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #522 9/10 - 9/12/2006
Post by: msmarple on September 10, 2006, 01:41:56 PM
SunFreak - In your post on this thread, page 1, you say:

Quote
Woman attacked at Hadacurari Beach fisherman's huts week prior to Natalee's disappearance


For the Murder & Crime thread - Is this the Tracy Allen incident? Because we have that one at Fisherman's Huts, and my assumption is the "Marriott" huts (because she had a time share at Marriott).

So is this a separate incident - at Hadacurari Beach? (Which I'm afraid is a whole new place name for me.)

Thank you. If it's a separate incident, maybe you could pop on over to the Murder & Crime thread and add it. (See my sig line.)

Monkeys - Please read the Murder & Crime thread and add any other incidents, or details to the ones we have.

ALSO - Anna and I are wondering if the newspapers on Aruba might be stifling these kinds of stories (online versions, at least) as a result of this thread. Wonder if anyone could pursue that?

That thread is a very powerful collection of information. Thanks to every monkey who has contributed!


Title: Lively Case Discussion #522 9/10 - 9/12/2006
Post by: Spock on September 10, 2006, 01:51:35 PM
After reading The two Kalpoes "witness" statements, I can say they must have rehersed that security guard alibi story many times. Almost infinite details about the attire and description of the guard. Most people believe the "dry run" was made Monday evening when the suspects met poolside with Paulus to prepare the story. This is also the time Paulus is believed to have said "no corpse- no crime".


Title: Lively Case Discussion #522 9/10 - 9/12/2006
Post by: Ono on September 10, 2006, 01:56:21 PM
Quote from: "San"
Quote from: "SunFreak2"
Revisiting the Fishermen's Huts:


{{EDITED}}

SO, if Natalee is sitting behind Deepak in the car, when Deepak gets out to urinate, Natalee could jump out right after him.  Natalee takes off running. Joran jumps out to chase her.  Satish slides into driver's seat & follows in car.  Between Joran & Deepak chasing her, Natalee was probably running scared for her life. She's drugged so she's not functioning well cognitively or with physical coordination.  She either falls on her own, is pushed (tackled) by Joran, or hit by the car and goes flying into the rocks.  She's bleeding profusely from a head wound and most likely other laceratons from the rocks.  They grab her, throw her in the backseat, getting blood on the seat covers and head liner.  Deepak & Satish are freaking out so Joran the level headed psychopath drives.  They pull over at the pond to wash the blood off, check on Natalee and figure out what to do next.  Now, I think they take Natalee to Joran's, and the Kalpoes go home.

Natalee makes her calls in here....

Is this where Joran involves Guido, Koen, Sander or Freddy or does he go to Paulus?

Great theory.  This is what I think happened.  This is where Paulus made the decision not to help her.  He knows Joran is in deep sh!t and he won't help Natalee because she got the phone call off from his home.  They are all going down if they do.


Remember Joran said ( for some reason this stuck out to me like a sore thumb because it had a rare ring of truth ) : "I do what my family TELLS me to do"...( in other words, my dad can get me out of any legal problem and my mom directs the PR followup ). I still have questions regarding exactly when Paulus became involved in that evening's plans for Natalee...?? Targeting her was so pre-meditated, in my opinion...more than several hours.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #522 9/10 - 9/12/2006
Post by: mrs. red on September 10, 2006, 01:56:50 PM
Quote from: "sandy leiva"
Quote from: "BTgirl"
Thank you, Sandy Leiva


your very welcome monkey friends


Yes Thank You So Much Sandy...


Title: Lively Case Discussion #522 9/10 - 9/12/2006
Post by: Spock on September 10, 2006, 02:00:45 PM
Quote from: "Spock"
After reading The two Kalpoes "witness" statements, I can say they must have rehersed that security guard alibi story many times. Almost infinite details about the attire and description of the guard. Most people believe the "dry run" was made Monday evening when the suspects met poolside with Paulus to prepare the story. This is also the time Paulus is believed to have said "no corpse- no crime".


Deepak stated:

I can tell you the following:
- he is approximately 1.85 meters tall;
- he has a heavy set body;
- he has close-cropped hair;
- he wore a black t-shirt;
- he wore a black cotton long trousers which most of the keepers use and
- he kept walkie talkie in its hands and according to me he spoke by means of the walkie talkie.

Satish stated:

I will answer you the following:

- he is approximately 1.70 meters tall;
- he has a strong build;
- he has close-cropped black hair;
- he wore a black t-shirt;
- he wore black cotton long trousers which most of the guards wear and
- he held a walkie talkie in his hands


Title: Lively Case Discussion #522 9/10 - 9/12/2006
Post by: Ono on September 10, 2006, 02:00:55 PM
Quote from: "justinsmama"
http://www.wafflehouse.com/


 :lol:

Jacquie:  If you ever prepare grits for yourself, remember to treat them as you would mashed potatoes...must always add salt & pepper, and butter...and make certain they are NOT runny but of the same consistency of mashed potatoes!  (Once, in Dallas of all places,  I was served runny grits and liked-ta-died!  :lol: )


Title: Lively Case Discussion #522 9/10 - 9/12/2006
Post by: Shizaru on September 10, 2006, 02:08:30 PM
From Satish statement:

Joran started to dance hereafter with white girl with blonde hair. I only walked around then.  According to me my brother with Joran lagged behind. I walked around in the bldg. of Carlos & Charlies but I did not run to (?). After I had walked around, I met Deepak and Joran at the dancing floor/stage. Then the three of us agreed that it was too boring at Carlos & Charlies and that we would go to the house (home?). I saw that Joran was talking with the white girl. On Monday, May 30, 2005, around 01:15, we walked with our guest to Deepak’s car.

Did Joran ever say he danced with Natalee?  And here Satish has Deepak remaining inside the bar the whole time with them?


Title: Lively Case Discussion #522 9/10 - 9/12/2006
Post by: Ono on September 10, 2006, 02:10:44 PM
Quote from: "Shizaru"
Any theory that has all 3 suspects present when she was seriously injured or killed is not realistic.  It's totally inconsistent with the timing of Deepaks' computer activity, the text mesages between Joran and Deepak, and the secretly recorded polis conversation, which prove beyond a reasonable doubt that least one memeber of the trio does not know what happened to her.


In my opinion, you perhaps may be placing too much confidence in the authenticity/legitimacy of Deepak's computer, etc. activity...I am sceptical of the accuracy thereof. Some of this could easily be well-placed/timed red herring swimming after the fact.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #522 9/10 - 9/12/2006
Post by: Leslie on September 10, 2006, 02:11:04 PM
Pages 2 and 3 of Satish's Witness statement do not enlarge when clicked.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #522 9/10 - 9/12/2006
Post by: mrs. red on September 10, 2006, 02:12:31 PM
Quote from: "Shizaru"
From Satish statement:

Joran started to dance hereafter with white girl with blonde hair. I only walked around then.  According to me my brother with Joran lagged behind. I walked around in the bldg. of Carlos & Charlies but I did not run to (?). After I had walked around, I met Deepak and Joran at the dancing floor/stage. Then the three of us agreed that it was too boring at Carlos & Charlies and that we would go to the house (home?). I saw that Joran was talking with the white girl. On Monday, May 30, 2005, around 01:15, we walked with our guest to Deepak’s car.

Did Joran ever say he danced with Natalee?  And here Satish has Deepak remaining inside the bar the whole time with them?


Not that I am aware of...In fact, what I recall is Joran emphatically states he did NOT dance with her.....

 which is why I said what I did earlier to you...  we never hear from anyone other than Joran and Deepak that Natalee was calling them over to her to go dance...  did we?


Title: Lively Case Discussion #522 9/10 - 9/12/2006
Post by: Ono on September 10, 2006, 02:13:23 PM
Quote from: "Ono"
Quote from: "Shizaru"
Any theory that has all 3 suspects present when she was seriously injured or killed is not realistic.  It's totally inconsistent with the timing of Deepaks' computer activity, the text mesages between Joran and Deepak, and the secretly recorded polis conversation, which prove beyond a reasonable doubt that least one memeber of the trio does not know what happened to her.


In my opinion, you perhaps may be placing too much confidence in the authenticity/legitimacy of Deepak's computer, etc. activity...I am sceptical of the accuracy thereof. Some of this could easily be well-placed/timed red herring swimming after the fact.


Oops...meant "skeptical"..sorry.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #522 9/10 - 9/12/2006
Post by: klaasend on September 10, 2006, 02:13:37 PM
Quote from: "Leslie"
Pages 2 and 3 of Satish's Witness statement do not enlarge when clicked.

Try now, I think Red fixed it.  Also it is posted in the Important Case Documents thread.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #522 9/10 - 9/12/2006
Post by: nonesuche on September 10, 2006, 02:14:08 PM
And amazingly where is the part of the story as per Joran's interview with Greta, that he resisted Natalee's advances asking him to dance????

Wasn't it Dompig who broadcast to the world that they had new information late last summer that Natalee may have been using drugs too????

What will it take for some to see that this sham of an investigation has been nothing but lies, lies, and more lies.

Natalee Ann Holloway was not an honor student on a girl gone wild trip, she didn't ask for this to happen to her, and I hope some can get the Renfro/Dompig/SCohen/CCroes/RU smear campaign out of their head now.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #522 9/10 - 9/12/2006
Post by: Leslie on September 10, 2006, 02:15:40 PM
The time of the statement is missing from the English version.  It is 7:20 PM according to the original.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #522 9/10 - 9/12/2006
Post by: mrs. red on September 10, 2006, 02:17:49 PM
All three of us walked to the bar and my brother Deepak bought a whisky coke for me and also a drink for himself. Joran also bought an alcoholic drink for himself.

the above quoted from Satish's statement...


 This is what I meant by Joran's semantics in my assessment based on what Jossy said about drinks costing $20 if they were drugged... Joran in an interview said the drinks cost $20... and here we have k2 buying their own drinks....

Sorry, Shiz... I don't mean to seem like I am hammering your thoughts, just my opinion is the polar opposite and everything that you say seems like it is totally opposite of what I think....


Title: Lively Case Discussion #522 9/10 - 9/12/2006
Post by: Spock on September 10, 2006, 02:22:16 PM
Quote from: "Ono"
Quote from: "Shizaru"
Any theory that has all 3 suspects present when she was seriously injured or killed is not realistic.  It's totally inconsistent with the timing of Deepaks' computer activity, the text mesages between Joran and Deepak, and the secretly recorded polis conversation, which prove beyond a reasonable doubt that least one memeber of the trio does not know what happened to her.


In my opinion, you perhaps may be placing too much confidence in the authenticity/legitimacy of Deepak's computer, etc. activity...I am sceptical of the accuracy thereof. Some of this could easily be well-placed/timed red herring swimming after the fact.


Frankly you theory is wrong. Buying the girl the equivalent of five drinks in thirty minutes at closing time is premeditation. Also, the Kalpoes are far more than "just drivers". The Kalpoes agreed to the security guard alibi to protect themselves, not just Joran.  Paulus would not have found the need to hire each Kalpoe boy two attornies each if they were simply drivers. I also find it revealing that Deepak sent an email stating "the girl had put her hands down his pants and grasped his penis"


Title: Lively Case Discussion #522 9/10 - 9/12/2006
Post by: igsigs on September 10, 2006, 02:24:17 PM
Quote from: "Shizaru"
From Satish statement:

Did Joran ever say he danced with Natalee?  And here Satish has Deepak remaining inside the bar the whole time with them?

First reference i have seen that has Joran dancing.

Also has the 4 of them walking together to the car. Deepak does not.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #522 9/10 - 9/12/2006
Post by: klaasend on September 10, 2006, 02:26:37 PM
Quote from: "Leslie"
The time of the statement is missing from the English version.  It is 7:20 PM according to the original.

Thanks Leslie - have no idea how I missed that.  I've added it to the English version in the forum.  Not sure if it really makes enough difference to correct the front page one.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #522 9/10 - 9/12/2006
Post by: San on September 10, 2006, 02:26:46 PM
Quote from: "mrs. red"
All three of us walked to the bar and my brother Deepak bought a whisky coke for me and also a drink for himself. Joran also bought an alcoholic drink for himself.

the above quoted from Satish's statement...


 This is what I meant by Joran's semantics in my assessment based on what Jossy said about drinks costing $20 if they were drugged... Joran in an interview said the drinks cost $20... and here we have k2 buying their own drinks....

Sorry, Shiz... I don't mean to seem like I am hammering your thoughts, just my opinion is the polar opposite and everything that you say seems like it is totally opposite of what I think....


Deepak's 5/31/05 Statement:

All three of us walked to the bar and Joran bought three glasses of "whisky coke".  After Joran paid for this we walked around.

They can remember every little detail but can't remember who paid for what drink.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #522 9/10 - 9/12/2006
Post by: mrs. red on September 10, 2006, 02:28:43 PM
Quote from: San
Quote from: "mrs. red"
All three of us walked to the bar and my brother Deepak bought a whisky coke for me and also a drink for himself. Joran also bought an alcoholic drink for himself.

the above quoted from Satish's statement...


 This is what I meant by Joran's semantics in my assessment based on what Jossy said about drinks costing $20 if they were drugged... Joran in an interview said the drinks cost $20... and here we have k2 buying their own drinks....

Sorry, Shiz... I don't mean to seem like I am hammering your thoughts, just my opinion is the polar opposite and everything that you say seems like it is totally opposite of what I think....


Deepak's 5/31/05 Statement:

All three of us walked to the bar and Joran bought three glasses of "whisky coke".  After Joran paid for this we walked around.

They can remember every little detail but can't remember who paid for what drink.[/quote


I am thinking that maybe they don't let Satish out to talk is that he is going to inadvertently slip up and say something that shouldn't be discussed.... personally, I think that k2 probably did buy their own drinks... but that is of course, based on my theory of Joran's semantics...


Title: Lively Case Discussion #522 9/10 - 9/12/2006
Post by: Sam on September 10, 2006, 02:29:29 PM
I am going to have to read and compare all three of there statements together beofre I can make a judgement of any sort. As far as times and other things we all see things a little differently meaning it is a proven fact that you can have a dozen folks in a room and what they see will all be different.

Off topic, I had an email from Darleen of Alabama today. I did not notice when it was sent but go the feeling she was home again. Has she been in yet?


Title: Lively Case Discussion #522 9/10 - 9/12/2006
Post by: Ono on September 10, 2006, 02:29:29 PM
Quote from: "BTgirl"
I put Google Earth on my computer the other day, and last night I was looking at Aruba. From the air, that whole place looks like a Gosh-forsaken heck hole.

Except for that one strip of hotels, it all looks like a vast wasteland. Could someone tell me again why the place is supposed to be an island paradise?


Good question...for one thing, it was constantly being 'sold' as the safest place in the Caribbean.  Also, I think the thrill of "flying off to an island" is appealing? Little did anyone dream of just how many pirates still roam the landscape there and just how dangerous Aruba really is.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #522 9/10 - 9/12/2006
Post by: San on September 10, 2006, 02:30:20 PM
Quote from: mrs. red
Quote from: "San"
Quote from: "mrs. red"
All three of us walked to the bar and my brother Deepak bought a whisky coke for me and also a drink for himself. Joran also bought an alcoholic drink for himself.

the above quoted from Satish's statement...


 This is what I meant by Joran's semantics in my assessment based on what Jossy said about drinks costing $20 if they were drugged... Joran in an interview said the drinks cost $20... and here we have k2 buying their own drinks....

Sorry, Shiz... I don't mean to seem like I am hammering your thoughts, just my opinion is the polar opposite and everything that you say seems like it is totally opposite of what I think....


Deepak's 5/31/05 Statement:

All three of us walked to the bar and Joran bought three glasses of "whisky coke".  After Joran paid for this we walked around.

They can remember every little detail but can't remember who paid for what drink.[/quote


I am thinking that maybe they don't let Satish out to talk is that he is going to inadvertently slip up and say something that shouldn't be discussed.... personally, I think that k2 probably did buy their own drinks... but that is of course, based on my theory of Joran's semantics...

I agree that they bought their own drinks.  Once again we have Joran using them.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #522 9/10 - 9/12/2006
Post by: mrs. red on September 10, 2006, 02:30:22 PM
Quote from: "Sam"
I am going to have to read and compare all three of there statements together beofre I can make a judgement of any sort. As far as times and other things we all see things a little differently meaning it is a proven fact that you can have a dozen folks in a room and what they see will all be different.

Off topic, I had an email from Darleen of Alabama today. I did not notice when it was sent but go the feeling she was home again. Has she been in yet?


I was copied on a mass email that she replied to... I think she might be home... I haven't seen her in the cage though...


Title: Lively Case Discussion #522 9/10 - 9/12/2006
Post by: mrs. red on September 10, 2006, 02:31:43 PM
Quote from: San
Quote from: "mrs. red"
Quote from: "San"
Quote from: "mrs. red"
All three of us walked to the bar and my brother Deepak bought a whisky coke for me and also a drink for himself. Joran also bought an alcoholic drink for himself.

the above quoted from Satish's statement...


 This is what I meant by Joran's semantics in my assessment based on what Jossy said about drinks costing $20 if they were drugged... Joran in an interview said the drinks cost $20... and here we have k2 buying their own drinks....

Sorry, Shiz... I don't mean to seem like I am hammering your thoughts, just my opinion is the polar opposite and everything that you say seems like it is totally opposite of what I think....


Deepak's 5/31/05 Statement:

All three of us walked to the bar and Joran bought three glasses of "whisky coke".  After Joran paid for this we walked around.

They can remember every little detail but can't remember who paid for what drink.[/quote


I am thinking that maybe they don't let Satish out to talk is that he is going to inadvertently slip up and say something that shouldn't be discussed.... personally, I think that k2 probably did buy their own drinks... but that is of course, based on my theory of Joran's semantics...

I agree that they bought their own drinks.  Once again we have Joran using them.


Yes San, it's amazing that the two brothers haven't figured out yet that they are only for using... not really part of Joran's pimping team....


Title: Lively Case Discussion #522 9/10 - 9/12/2006
Post by: igsigs on September 10, 2006, 02:32:47 PM
We are talking about 3 guys here, who were not drunk, being asked to recall a 20/25 min period at C&Cs on a boring, otherwise uneventful Sunday night. Should not be hard.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #522 9/10 - 9/12/2006
Post by: mrs. red on September 10, 2006, 02:33:47 PM
I need to run out for a while... but o/t .. if any one who is interested in the Black Dahalia case hasn't seen it... the thread in the Unsolved Crimes has some cool pictures that LV took of one of the places that is thought to be involved in the murder... be sure and check that out!!

Keep the faith monkeys.... I do think Justice will prevail!!


Title: Lively Case Discussion #522 9/10 - 9/12/2006
Post by: nonesuche on September 10, 2006, 02:34:27 PM
San,

I think you may need a bigger gun now  :lol:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #522 9/10 - 9/12/2006
Post by: nonesuche on September 10, 2006, 02:35:20 PM
Quote from: "igsigs"
We are talking about 3 guys here, who were not drunk, being asked to recall a 20/25 min period at C&Cs on a boring, otherwise uneventful Sunday night. Should not be hard.


yes and even with tutoring from Paulus, they could not keep it straight or maybe we can call some of this freudian slips?


Title: Lively Case Discussion #522 9/10 - 9/12/2006
Post by: Leslie on September 10, 2006, 02:35:39 PM
Random thoughts:
The Kalpoe's buy their own booze according to this statement.  
Satish was wearing a blue cap?
Why does the 15 minutes spent at Joran's apt. (printing out homework) between the Kalpoe's arrival and the departure for C&C's always get mentioned? I wonder if the trip into the room in the main house, where the family computer is, was also a visit to the VDS's well stocked bar.
Why do they never get asked what was discussed in the car on the way to C&C's?  None of them have ever said what the topic of conversation was and it is important.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #522 9/10 - 9/12/2006
Post by: klaasend on September 10, 2006, 02:42:49 PM
I need to get some "real" work done now, will be lurking and not posting for a while. :wink:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #522 9/10 - 9/12/2006
Post by: Leslie on September 10, 2006, 02:48:10 PM
The description of the black security guard seems to be missing an important detail - his approximate age. That might narrow the field a little.  I guess Paul forgot to cover every detail in this piece of fiction.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #522 9/10 - 9/12/2006
Post by: San on September 10, 2006, 02:59:26 PM
Quote from: "Leslie"
Random thoughts:
The Kalpoe's buy their own booze according to this statement.  
Satish was wearing a blue cap?
Why does the 15 minutes spent at Joran's apt. (printing out homework) between the Kalpoe's arrival and the departure for C&C's always get mentioned? I wonder if the trip into the room in the main house, where the family computer is, was also a visit to the VDS's well stocked bar.
Why do they never get asked what was discussed in the car on the way to C&C's? None of them have ever said what the topic of conversation was and it is important.

Their answer will be we were watching a movie.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #522 9/10 - 9/12/2006
Post by: Leslie on September 10, 2006, 03:01:09 PM
Satish was sitting in the front, passenger seat yet he noticed that Joran was "fingering" Natalee.  I can imagine the Deepak, the driver watching the backseat activities in his rearview mirror but Satish would have had to turn around to see that.  I doubt if Natalee would allow that.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #522 9/10 - 9/12/2006
Post by: Shizaru on September 10, 2006, 03:07:36 PM
Quote from: "igsigs"
We are talking about 3 guys here, who were not drunk, being asked to recall a 20/25 min period at C&Cs on a boring, otherwise uneventful Sunday night. Should not be hard.


Minor discrepancies like who paid for drinks aren't important, but so far we've seen two fairly large discrepancies in the accounts of events at CnCs.  In Deepak's 6/14 statement he has Satish temporarily leaving the bar to bring him the keys after recieving his missed call, while Satish appears to agree with Joran that he was with Joran the entire time.  And now we have Satish saying in his 5/31 statement that Deepak and Joran remained together  inside CnCs while he walked around inside, vs.  Deepak and Joran consistently saying that Satish and Joran remained together inside CnCs while Deepak went out to the car.  And while it isn't explicitly stated, Satish's 5/31 statement also implies that the 4 walked out together, vs. Deepak and Joran consistently saying that Deepak waited for them in the car.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #522 9/10 - 9/12/2006
Post by: LilPuma on September 10, 2006, 03:11:12 PM
Quote from: "Shizaru"
I certainly was not suggesting that Natalee was in any way to blame.  The reason it matters why she got in the car, whether she was willing or drugged, is that her condition and state of mind is relevant to what occured after that, where they took her and how she died.  I think that she got in the car willingly, because her judgement was seriously impaired by alcohol.  I don't think she knew what kind of effect a 151 shot would have on someone her size.  I think she knew she was getting into a private vehicle, not likely she'd mistake a car parked behind the building for a cab.  However I don't think she expected anything more when she got in the car, than a ride back to her hotel with maybe some making out on the way.  Maybe she thought Joran was cute and wanted a little romance on her last night on the island, maybe she was trying to make some MBer jealous, maybe it was both.  Either way I think she was a good girl who trusted the wrong person and paid for it with her life.  I don't think this was a planned crime tho.  If that is the case why were 2K Joran's third choice?  Are Andre and Florencia part of the rape gang too?  And why were 2K giving away that they weren't cab drivers by coming in and drinking with Joran?  Frankly this "20 times before quote" is being used dishonestly.  Joran was not saying they had committed rape 20 times before, just that they had picked up tourist girls 20 times before.  I think the plan that night was the same as the other 20 times,  find some drunk tourist girls, have Joran get them even drunker by buying them some 151 shots, then offer them a ride back to their hotel and see what happened.  Maybe I'm wrong but I think there is far too much uniformity of opinion on the pro-family boards that this was a premediated abduction by a well-organized pimp squad, the alternative that it was a crime of opportunity doesn't even get 5% as much attention.  Which is unfortunate because there is certainly plenty of circumstantial evidence pointing to the latter, and which sort of crime it was makes a difference as to which scenarios are more plausable when trying to determine what ultimately happened to her.


I didn't take your original post to mean you thought Natalee was in any way responsible for her own demise.  I do think this was planned in that some of the island boys have a routine that gets them the tourist girls.  Joran getting to C&C's so late and lying about the fact that he planned to go there long before he played blackjack with Natalee's friends, the kalpoes going along with the late arrival and driving just for one drink, tells me this was a routine scenario where they expected more than a drink.  20 times before: show up late looking for some girls you've seen around, met, get them to come with you.   I think Natalee may have gone with Joran willingly as he was known to the MB kids casually.  I think she may have wanted to see the lighthouse and sharks and she got separated from her friends before she could tell them she was going with Joran and they couldn't talk her out of it.  Getting separated from her friends after drinking a shot of 151 and it was "so simple that night":  she was trusting and naive, so giving her a ride, getting her in the car, was easy.  I think she expected to see the lighthouse and sharks and go back to her hotel.  The falling asleep and waking up makes me think she was drugged.  But if she was, I doubt there was a 3 am phone call from her.  Also, Joran at first said she was drinking and maybe doing drugs:  he was covering for putting something in her drink perhaps.  I think at some point she did tell Joran to "just put me down".  But it wasn't because she didn't want to go to her hotel.  She was conscious and didn't want to go where he was taking her.  This is also where she hit her head, scraped her knee or whatever that Joran's initial story tried to cover.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #522 9/10 - 9/12/2006
Post by: Tylergal on September 10, 2006, 03:11:20 PM
Quote from: "mrs. red"
Quote from: "klaasend"
Quote from: "mrs. red"
Quote from: "Tylergal"
Morning, Monkeys.  Lots of theories and speculation going on and so much of it seems so plausible.  I think the truth would have put all the theories to rest, but I think SunFreak might be onto something.  Is this not when they were "driving fast?"  I think that was when they had a very seriously injured or dead Natalee on their hands.

CALL OUT TO MRS. RED:  There must be Waffle House's in the Northeast.  I saw the website of John Kerry's girlfriend and the theme song was by John Kerry, and he was singing, "I get my women at the waffle house."


Sunfreak - I have decided that they ran over her... it makes, in my mind, the most sense for a lot of things.

Tyler
, I promise I have never, ever seen one.... and Red and I drive all over the place.... LOL.  Kerry is just trying to "play" to the South...  :lol:


Waffle House - you can pick your state and it will tell you how many stores.

http://www.wafflehouse.com/default.asp

Hi All!


I saw that... ME, CT, MA, RI, NH, NJ and NY are not even listed.... those are all my driving distance places.... and Red hates Waffle House... :shock:  he is all about Cracker Barrell... :lol:
:oops:

It was meant to be a joke.  Remember Bush saying Kerry waffled all the time?  Well, he did have several mistresses and they put together a webite called "Hedgefund mistresses" and the used that song from FloraBama "I get my women at the waffle house" as a play on words. :oops:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #522 9/10 - 9/12/2006
Post by: Tylergal on September 10, 2006, 03:12:51 PM
Quote from: "Spock"
I can't wait to see Joran's 5/31 witness statement. I have a feeling he mentioned a walk on the beach by the fisherman's huts.


Do you not think those statements were all 'prefab' statements meant to "stick to the same story" as coached by Paulus VanderSlaughter.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #522 9/10 - 9/12/2006
Post by: Ono on September 10, 2006, 03:13:46 PM
Quote from: "Leslie"
Random thoughts:
The Kalpoe's buy their own booze according to this statement.  
Satish was wearing a blue cap?
Why does the 15 minutes spent at Joran's apt. (printing out homework) between the Kalpoe's arrival and the departure for C&C's always get mentioned? I wonder if the trip into the room in the main house, where the family computer is, was also a visit to the VDS's well stocked bar.
Why do they never get asked what was discussed in the car on the way to C&C's?  None of them have ever said what the topic of conversation was and it is important.


I've wondered the same thing regarding the time spent inside Joran's apartment...I think there's a reason why they have to pretend that whatever it was that they were doing there, it was as innocent as schoolwork.  I don't believe it.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #522 9/10 - 9/12/2006
Post by: San on September 10, 2006, 03:21:48 PM
DEEPAK'S 5/31/05 STATEMENT:

On Monday, May 30, 2005, around 00.00, I went to pick up Joran at this house.  I went together with mt brother named Satish Sharma KALPIE to pick up Joran at his house.  Satish and I remained approximately 15 minutes at Joran's house.  I must note that Joran lives in an apartment beside the dwelling that his parents live.  Around 00.25, Satish, Joran and I left for "Carlos & Charlies".  I must note that we arrived at Carlos & Charlies at around 00.40.

SATISH'S 5/31/05 STATEMENT:

After Joran was ready, all three of us left for Carlos& Charlies.  Around 11:45 we stepped into the bldg.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #522 9/10 - 9/12/2006
Post by: Kat_Gram on September 10, 2006, 03:29:26 PM
Quote from: "Leslie"
Satish was sitting in the front, passenger seat yet he noticed that Joran was "fingering" Natalee.  I can imagine the Deepak, the driver watching the backseat activities in his rearview mirror but Satish would have had to turn around to see that.  I doubt if Natalee would allow that.

Well, it never happened. Deepak phoned Satish and told him what to say. Then, when he saw Satish, he went over it with him. That is likely why Satish said that he wasn't going to say any more.
With the difference in these details, why did they arrest the guards ?


Title: Lively Case Discussion #522 9/10 - 9/12/2006
Post by: mrs. red on September 10, 2006, 03:31:02 PM
Tyler, I am such a dork.... NOW, I get it!!! :oops:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #522 9/10 - 9/12/2006
Post by: Anna on September 10, 2006, 03:35:45 PM
.
Good Afternoon, Monkeys,

I read Satish's statement that Joran printed the homework in his apartment.  This would indicate the presence of yet another computer than the one in the main house we have been led to believe was the only one for the entire family.  Satish does not say he and Deepak waited alone in the apartment while Joran went to the main house to print the alleged homework.  I do believe we are missing one entire computer by the time ALE moseys over ten days later.

Not that it would matter.  The computer analysis is the sorriest piece of work I have ever seen by alleged professionals with its disclaimer that they could not read anything that had been deleted and is a joke anyway.  It certainly does not take an expert to read what is left on a hard drive which is all that report even claims to do.

But is there statement to the fact that Joran left the two Kelpoes alone in his apartment and went to the Big House for printing of the homework anywhere?  I mean early in the reports and not after they did away with Joran's computer from his apartment.  Allegedly.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #522 9/10 - 9/12/2006
Post by: Smish on September 10, 2006, 03:39:51 PM
Quote from: "San"
DEEPAK'S 5/31/05 STATEMENT:

On Monday, May 30, 2005, around 00.00, I went to pick up Joran at this house.  I went together with mt brother named Satish Sharma KALPIE to pick up Joran at his house.  Satish and I remained approximately 15 minutes at Joran's house.  I must note that Joran lives in an apartment beside the dwelling that his parents live.  Around 00.25, Satish, Joran and I left for "Carlos & Charlies".  I must note that we arrived at Carlos & Charlies at around 00.40.

SATISH'S 5/31/05 STATEMENT:

After Joran was ready, all three of us left for Carlos& Charlies.  Around 11:45 we stepped into the bldg.


Yup,I noticed Satish seems to be off on his time line that night.
Also,in Satish's statement,Dennis Jacobs is the only one taking this statement?Wasn't there a Kelly ALE and Jacobs taking Deepak's 5/31 statement?In Satish's statement it almost sounds like Jacobs is translating from Satish's statement....doesn't sound like Satish is acually giving his statement directly to Jacobs.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #522 9/10 - 9/12/2006
Post by: igsigs on September 10, 2006, 03:41:08 PM
Quote from: "Kat_Gram"

With the difference in these details, why did they arrest the guards ?

I do not believe a reasonable answer to this question exists.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #522 9/10 - 9/12/2006
Post by: Anna on September 10, 2006, 03:42:58 PM
Quote from: "Ono"
Quote from: "BTgirl"
I put Google Earth on my computer the other day, and last night I was looking at Aruba. From the air, that whole place looks like a Gosh-forsaken heck hole.

Except for that one strip of hotels, it all looks like a vast wasteland. Could someone tell me again why the place is supposed to be an island paradise?


Good question...for one thing, it was constantly being 'sold' as the safest place in the Caribbean.  Also, I think the thrill of "flying off to an island" is appealing? Little did anyone dream of just how many pirates still roam the landscape there and just how dangerous Aruba really is.



The "beautiful beaches" are for the most part manmade and developed primarily by the resorts which are mostly American franchises.  They are NOT naturally occurring beaches at all.  I wonder if they have to be maintained or if they would revert to the way the rest of the island is if not maintained by off-shore dredging, etc. should the big hotels cut back or even decide to leave because of lack of business.  

That is why the rest of the island looks as it does, that is how it was before "development" created the resort area.  More of the desert isle than any tropical paradise for sure.  Even the vegetation is stunted, warped by the wind and of the semi-arid variety.  I have been told that the soil is even very poor in many areas with high salt content.  Basically a big block of salt onto which some soil has accumulated over time.  Aruba owes a lot to tourism, that's for sure.   :roll:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #522 9/10 - 9/12/2006
Post by: Kat_Gram on September 10, 2006, 03:43:21 PM
We don't have Waffle Houses here in the North. It is cold here today. Winter on its way.
So, my SIL house's is the Waffle House. Big Round Belgian
Homemade waffles, fruit. warmed REAL MAPLE SYRUP from Quebec trees. Sometimes, ice cream on top.
Or Hot Maple Syrup poured on hard packed snow, then use a stick to wrap it up. Straight sugar...


Title: Satish's 5/31/05 Statement
Post by: LilPuma on September 10, 2006, 03:43:41 PM
Just read Satish's 5-31 statement.  Interesting that he says Joran danced with Natalee, says they went to the lighthouse; both of which Joran denies.   Satish does not mention Deepak going out to the car first, as Deepak has told us, does not mention Deepak being separated from him and Joran.  He also says they left C&C at 1:15, went to the lighthouse, and drove back to the Holiday Inn by 1:45 a.m.   They drove Joran home and were at home by 2:45.  Doesn't add up.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #522 9/10 - 9/12/2006
Post by: the big hammer on September 10, 2006, 03:48:54 PM
SO When Does Satish Arrive at C&C's?

San writes: "...SATISH'S 5/31/05 STATEMENT: After Joran was ready, all three of us left for Carlos& Charlies. Around 11:45 we stepped into the bldg..."

YES!

I have also noted same from Satish's later statement.  This is the SECOND time he provides arrival timing at C&C that is nearly an hour earlier than what both deepak and jvds give...

Do we believe that Satish, therefore, makes the same error in his story TWICE -- during two separate polis interrogations?

This first time I read Satish's later statement, I posted question re: their arrivals.  Note too that deepak puts Satish as the driver to sloot house to pick up jvds, and then to C&C's.  Why?  Joran clearly states that deepak was the driver to C&C's...

It looks to me that deepak and jvds may also be covering for Satish --

-- it is not clear that all 3 arrived together and at the same time: Satish may have been at C&C's earlier.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #522 9/10 - 9/12/2006
Post by: bleachedblack on September 10, 2006, 03:53:45 PM
Good afternoon Monkeys! I just finished reading Satish's statement. Thank-you for posting it and all the others. Does anyone here think that
INTERPOL is going to be going to Aruba to arrest whomever it was that the 3 amigoes handed Natalee over to after they finished driving her around in the car? Maybe then whenl she was unconscious due to the drugs they gave her, they handed her over to MP?


Title: Lively Case Discussion #522 9/10 - 9/12/2006
Post by: LilPuma on September 10, 2006, 03:55:28 PM
Quote from: "the big hammer"
SO When Does Satish Arrive at C&C's?

San writes: "...SATISH'S 5/31/05 STATEMENT: After Joran was ready, all three of us left for Carlos& Charlies. Around 11:45 we stepped into the bldg..."

YES!

I have also noted same from Satish's later statement.  This is the SECOND time he provides arrival timing at C&C that is nearly an hour earlier than what both deepak and jvds give...

Do we believe that Satish, therefore, makes the same error in his story TWICE -- during two separate polis interrogations?

This first time I read Satish's later statement, I posted question re: their arrivals.  Note too that deepak puts Satish as the driver to sloot house to pick up jvds, and then to C&C's.  Why?  Joran clearly states that deepak was the driver to C&C's...

It looks to me that deepak and jvds may also be covering for Satish --

-- it is not clear that all 3 arrived together and at the same time: Satish may have been at C&C's earlier.


It could also be that Satish picked up Deepak from work, they picked up Joran from the casino and did ????? until about 12:30.  No homework, no dinner at the Kalpoes, no Paulus pickup from McDonalds AND at least one of the MB guys says they saw Joran in the Kalpoe's car that evening, before C&C.  Melody's posts from last summer say she saw Joran before 12:00 a.m., but she didn't say if it was or wasn't near McDonalds.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #522 9/10 - 9/12/2006
Post by: Shizaru on September 10, 2006, 03:56:45 PM
here's a scenario that follows the same general outine of what I believe ocurred but has greater involvement by 2K:

They head for lighthouse but never get there (explaining why guard didn't see them) because Natalee passes out in the car first.  They stop at deserted spot on Arashi where Deepak says he took a leak, there Natalee gets molested by all 3.  They then head back to her hotel and Joran tells 2K to stop north of Marriott so he can have sex with Natalee on the beach there, he carries her from car to beach and 2K drive off.  One thing I do find suspicious about the trio's statements regarding the beach dropoff, is that none of the three mention Natalee saying a word at that point, no "Why are we stopping here", "Woohoo, the beach!", nothing.  Nor do they mention Joran giving her any reason why they are stopping there, they just describe her getting out of the car and walking off with him.  I think at a minimum 2K are probably lying about her condition when they reached the beach, and if she was conscious she was extremely intoxicated, disoriented and unable to walk without support.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #522 9/10 - 9/12/2006
Post by: San on September 10, 2006, 04:02:14 PM
Quote from: "the big hammer"
SO When Does Satish Arrive at C&C's?

San writes: "...SATISH'S 5/31/05 STATEMENT: After Joran was ready, all three of us left for Carlos& Charlies. Around 11:45 we stepped into the bldg..."

YES!

I have also noted same from Satish's later statement.  This is the SECOND time he provides arrival timing at C&C that is nearly an hour earlier than what both deepak and jvds give...

Do we believe that Satish, therefore, makes the same error in his story TWICE -- during two separate polis interrogations?

This first time I read Satish's later statement, I posted question re: their arrivals.  Note too that deepak puts Satish as the driver to sloot house to pick up jvds, and then to C&C's.  Why?  Joran clearly states that deepak was the driver to C&C's...

It looks to me that deepak and jvds may also be covering for Satish --

-- it is not clear that all 3 arrived together and at the same time: Satish may have been at C&C's earlier.

Was Satish the one scoping out CnC's to see who would be the best target.  When Joran and Deepak arrive he tells them who would be the best target.  Was Satish really at CnC's with Koen first.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #522 9/10 - 9/12/2006
Post by: bleachedblack on September 10, 2006, 04:02:38 PM
Shizaru your post fits with my recent thoughts......the reason nothing is mentioned is because she was unconscious by this time.

It is unbelievable to think that none of the three TALKED while jailed and interrogated. I believe, if not in the first couple of months, then at some point since....one of the three have spilled the can of worms. hence the comments about carrying guns, and the completion of the case in a few weeks . The Netherlands knows they are going in after the big boys. Oraganized crime/cartel boys.......


Title: Lively Case Discussion #522 9/10 - 9/12/2006
Post by: yapperz1 on September 10, 2006, 04:04:22 PM
Proof Kalpoes did not pick JVDS up at his home?

1. Saturday 5-28-05: Melody went to a party. (Made notation on her calendar)
2. Sunday 5-29-05: Melody went to the movies with her new BF. (noted on calendar because it was when she & new BF shared their 1st kiss)
3. Says she saw JVDS leaning against a pillar very near Seaport Casino (turn corner & cross the road from theater?)
4. JVDS saw her with new BF & his face turned into a "hurt" face.
5. Says she knows the time was b4 12am (midnight)
6. Checked the current schedule for Seaport Cinema: Wednesday thru Tuesday earliest show is at 4:10pm, late shows are 10:10pm & 10:20pm
7. Deepak works @ Cyberzone Internet Cafe, Seaport Mall. (Sunday hours: 2pm - 10pm)
8. **On 8-3 BETH stated to "CNN” that while she was in Alabama BETH learned from a “Mountain Brook High School” male 2005 graduate that on 5-29 at 11:00 PM Prime Suspect J. SLOOT was already with Current Suspect D. KALPOE (he was not leaving the “Holiday Inn,” he was not walking towards or at the “McDonald’s” as he claimed, and he was not with Current Suspect P. SLOOT) and Prime Suspect J. SLOOT offered another “Mountain Brook High School” male a ride back to the “Holiday Inn.”
(from World Journier timeline)
 
So, if JVDS was already with Kalpoe by 11pm, where did they go b4 Carlos n Charlies? Sounds like PVDS changed the time he picked JVDS up @ McDonald's to again cover for the lying sporter


Title: Lively Case Discussion #522 9/10 - 9/12/2006
Post by: friend of monkeys on September 10, 2006, 04:13:42 PM
Quote from: "Ono"
Quote from: "BTgirl"
I put Google Earth on my computer the other day, and last night I was looking at Aruba. From the air, that whole place looks like a Gosh-forsaken heck hole.

Except for that one strip of hotels, it all looks like a vast wasteland. Could someone tell me again why the place is supposed to be an island paradise?


Good question...for one thing, it was constantly being 'sold' as the safest place in the Caribbean.  Also, I think the thrill of "flying off to an island" is appealing? Little did anyone dream of just how many pirates still roam the landscape there and just how dangerous Aruba really is.



 :shock:  :shock:  :shock:
yes....and i hear it is getting worse....desperate really....
i will never go back


Title: Lively Case Discussion #522 9/10 - 9/12/2006
Post by: Leslie on September 10, 2006, 04:16:14 PM
Friend of Monkeys:  How tall are Mickey John and Abraham Jones?


Title: Lively Case Discussion #522 9/10 - 9/12/2006
Post by: Shell on September 10, 2006, 04:26:42 PM
Good day you all.
 :)

The 3 boys describe the (one)security guard in their statements.  Yet 2 security guards are arrested. I would think the 3 boys would have to identify the security guard after he was arrested. Surely that is grounds for filing some major charges against the boys. That alone could have had grave consequenses for those 2 guards. False information by the 3, fingering 2 innocent men.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #522 9/10 - 9/12/2006
Post by: JA on September 10, 2006, 04:26:58 PM
Shizaru,

I agree with you that the case is simplier than many are amking it out to be.  The cover-up of the case though reaches farther implications and involves many more.  The cover-up deals with a corrupt island that covers up more than the NH case and is controled by a minority of those who see themselves as the elite if the island.

-Joran is an out of control teen who is promiscious, gambles, drin ks heavily,and possibly does drugs.  He has his mother and father wrapped around his finger and has for many years.  EWither that or they are afraid of him.

-Joran uses people whether they be for rides a convenient friendship, or women for the use of partying and sex.

-Joran has picked up tourist women at least 20 times for his own pleasure and/or possibly his close circle of friends.  he takes advantage or a drunk tourist or possibly helps this along with the use of more drugs/alcohol.  If he can get "lucky" and get the girl without alcohol, so be it.  His activities may range from heavy petting, intercourse, date rape, and possibly videotaping/photographing.  He truthfully thinks nothing of this because in his eyes he sees himself irresistable and never sees the women again so doesn't have to face the reality of what he did.  I imagine he treats gfs much the same way.  He is manipulative and comes off as charming when all women ( tourist and island girls) first meet him.  The tourist girls go home he goes for the next conquest.

-The boys pick up Natalee with no other plan than the above.  She is a nice girl who unfortunately uses poor judgement under the influence of drugs(GHB)/alcohol and at the time thinks she will shortly be returning to her hotel or being intoxicated is thinking of nothing but the moment.

-I doubt Nat welcomed the contact the boys describe in the car.  I do not see Natalee ( from what we know of her) b3ehaving that way with two other males in the car.  Maybe some kissing, but that is about it.  She was either unaware of her surrounding, semi-unconscious, or resisting.

-Somewhere along the line Natalee either had a bad reaction from the drugs/alcohol, or she tried to get away and was injured.  Those with her at the time did not see medical attention for her she died quickly.  I assume there was more unwanted sexual contact with Joran and possibly the Deepak/Satish.

-At sometime I feel Nat was at the sloots.  She may have already been dead or in a bad physical condition ( very intoxicated/injured.)

-Paulus was called in to assist Joran and or the boys and the disposal and cover-up begins.  In order to protect Joran, Paulus threatens the Kalpoes because they were either directly involved or by association.  He tells them he will assist them with an alibi and lawyer fees.  They get in over their head.  They see Joran getting off, so they have no reason to come forward with the truth.

-The island polis department and politicains are corrupt. Many favors are paid, many threaten to uncover past deeds and favors.  Lower level politicains and poils want to keep their jobs, all keep quiet.  A few know exactly what happened, many probably have a pretty accurate idea of what happened, but again. to keep the island happy, one must stay quiet.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #522 9/10 - 9/12/2006
Post by: Smish on September 10, 2006, 04:27:26 PM
I, Dennis Dominico JACOBS, head agent at the Korps Police force Aruba and at the Atraco team classified, explain the following.

On Tuesday, May 31, 2005, at 19:20, I interrogated and took a witness statement from the man named:

Satish Sharma KALPOE

born in Surinam on July 30 1986, without profession student at (H4I Colegio Arubano) and residing in Hooiberg number 91-B on Aruba.

Are in Dutch taken off declaration by me, JACOBS, in Dutch it was translated, were put on record and sound as follows:

This doesn't sound like Dennis Jacobs interrogated Satish to me.Does anyone know what the bolded part above means?


Title: Lively Case Discussion #522 9/10 - 9/12/2006
Post by: Ono on September 10, 2006, 04:28:02 PM
Quote from: "friend of monkeys"
Quote from: "Ono"
Quote from: "BTgirl"
I put Google Earth on my computer the other day, and last night I was looking at Aruba. From the air, that whole place looks like a Gosh-forsaken heck hole.

Except for that one strip of hotels, it all looks like a vast wasteland. Could someone tell me again why the place is supposed to be an island paradise?


Good question...for one thing, it was constantly being 'sold' as the safest place in the Caribbean.  Also, I think the thrill of "flying off to an island" is appealing? Little did anyone dream of just how many pirates still roam the landscape there and just how dangerous Aruba really is.



 :shock:  :shock:  :shock:
yes....and i hear it is getting worse....desperate really....
i will never go back


I don't blame you at all FOM...it's also just a little too close to the communist Chavez and he's got his eye on Aruba..


Title: Lively Case Discussion #522 9/10 - 9/12/2006
Post by: mrs. red on September 10, 2006, 04:32:29 PM
Hey FOM... can you check your email?


Title: Lively Case Discussion #522 9/10 - 9/12/2006
Post by: friend of monkeys on September 10, 2006, 04:32:32 PM
Quote from: "Leslie"
Friend of Monkeys:  How tall are Mickey John and Abraham Jones?


mickey is like 6'...i never met the other guard


Title: Lively Case Discussion #522 9/10 - 9/12/2006
Post by: NM on September 10, 2006, 04:34:33 PM
Quote from: "Spock"
Quote from: "Spock"
After reading The two Kalpoes "witness" statements, I can say they must have rehersed that security guard alibi story many times. Almost infinite details about the attire and description of the guard. Most people believe the "dry run" was made Monday evening when the suspects met poolside with Paulus to prepare the story. This is also the time Paulus is believed to have said "no corpse- no crime".


Deepak stated:

I can tell you the following:
- he is approximately 1.85 meters tall;
- he has a heavy set body;
- he has close-cropped hair;
- he wore a black t-shirt;
- he wore a black cotton long trousers which most of the keepers use and
- he kept walkie talkie in its hands and according to me he spoke by means of the walkie talkie.

Satish stated:

I will answer you the following:

- he is approximately 1.70 meters tall;
- he has a strong build;
- he has close-cropped black hair;
- he wore a black t-shirt;
- he wore black cotton long trousers which most of the guards wear and
- he held a walkie talkie in his hands


Amazing details from 2 "people" (possible all 3) of such a minor detail while you are pulling away!

Hi Spock and all Monkeys!


Title: Lively Case Discussion #522 9/10 - 9/12/2006
Post by: memphis on September 10, 2006, 04:35:01 PM
Quote from: "San"
>SNIP< ....  Van der Straaten also knows it was a kidnapping and this is why he made the family take the signs down and say "Missing".  He is trying to eliminate those charges against Joran in case they either found Natalee or found out what happened to her... >SNIP<


Excellent tidbit, San!
I've never heard or thought of that.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #522 9/10 - 9/12/2006
Post by: Leslie on September 10, 2006, 04:35:07 PM
Quote from: "friend of monkeys"
Quote from: "Leslie"
Friend of Monkeys:  How tall are Mickey John and Abraham Jones?

mickey is like 6'...i never met the other guard

Thanks.  We see Deepak saying the phantom security guard was 6 ft tall and Satish saying 5 ft 5 inches.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #522 9/10 - 9/12/2006
Post by: mrs. red on September 10, 2006, 04:35:48 PM
Quote from: "Kat_Gram"
We don't have Waffle Houses here in the North. It is cold here today. Winter on its way.
So, my SIL house's is the Waffle House. Big Round Belgian
Homemade waffles, fruit. warmed REAL MAPLE SYRUP from Quebec trees. Sometimes, ice cream on top.
Or Hot Maple Syrup poured on hard packed snow, then use a stick to wrap it up. Straight sugar...


not that I am as far North, but it is cold... BRRRRRRRRR


Title: Lively Case Discussion #522 9/10 - 9/12/2006
Post by: friend of monkeys on September 10, 2006, 04:36:39 PM
Quote from: "Shell"
Good day you all.
 :)

The 3 boys describe the (one)security guard in their statements.  Yet 2 security guards are arrested. I would think the 3 boys would have to identify the security guard after he was arrested. Surely that is grounds for filing some major charges against the boys. That alone could have had grave consequenses for those 2 guards. False information by the 3, fingering 2 innocent men.



not in aruba...not if your daddy is paulus and he already got a big favor from vanderstratten.....placing the blame on anyone besides his son...

JA and Shirazu...i agree...this is simplier in the beginning....the cover up is what complicates it all...


Title: Lively Case Discussion #522 9/10 - 9/12/2006
Post by: friend of monkeys on September 10, 2006, 04:38:43 PM
Quote from: "NM"
Quote from: "Spock"
Quote from: "Spock"
After reading The two Kalpoes "witness" statements, I can say they must have rehersed that security guard alibi story many times. Almost infinite details about the attire and description of the guard. Most people believe the "dry run" was made Monday evening when the suspects met poolside with Paulus to prepare the story. This is also the time Paulus is believed to have said "no corpse- no crime".


Deepak stated:

I can tell you the following:
- he is approximately 1.85 meters tall;
- he has a heavy set body;
- he has close-cropped hair;
- he wore a black t-shirt;
- he wore a black cotton long trousers which most of the keepers use and
- he kept walkie talkie in its hands and according to me he spoke by means of the walkie talkie.

Satish stated:

I will answer you the following:

- he is approximately 1.70 meters tall;
- he has a strong build;
- he has close-cropped black hair;
- he wore a black t-shirt;
- he wore black cotton long trousers which most of the guards wear and
- he held a walkie talkie in his hands
[/color]

Amazing details from 2 "people" (possible all 3) of such a minor detail while you are pulling away!

Hi Spock and all Monkeys!




when MJ worked at the allegro his uniform was grey pants and a white guard shirt....this was in Dec 04


Title: Lively Case Discussion #522 9/10 - 9/12/2006
Post by: klaasend on September 10, 2006, 04:38:50 PM
Quote from: "Smish"
I, Dennis Dominico JACOBS, head agent at the Korps Police force Aruba and at the Atraco team classified, explain the following.

On Tuesday, May 31, 2005, at 19:20, I interrogated and took a witness statement from the man named:

Satish Sharma KALPOE

born in Surinam on July 30 1986, without profession student at (H4I Colegio Arubano) and residing in Hooiberg number 91-B on Aruba.

Are in Dutch taken off declaration by me, JACOBS, in Dutch it was translated, were put on record and sound as follows:

This doesn't sound like Dennis Jacobs interrogated Satish to me.Does anyone know what the bolded part above means?

He did.  The only thing that is confusing is why would he need to translate into Dutch a statement that was already taken in Dutch.  It could be an error in the Dutch statement.  Maybe the statement was taken in Papiamento, like Deepak's was then translated by Jacobs to Dutch.  All statement must be translated for submission to Dutch.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #522 9/10 - 9/12/2006
Post by: BTgirl on September 10, 2006, 04:46:58 PM
Quote from: "Anna"
Quote from: "Ono"
Quote from: "BTgirl"
I put Google Earth on my computer the other day, and last night I was looking at Aruba. From the air, that whole place looks like a Gosh-forsaken heck hole.

Except for that one strip of hotels, it all looks like a vast wasteland. Could someone tell me again why the place is supposed to be an island paradise?


Good question...for one thing, it was constantly being 'sold' as the safest place in the Caribbean.  Also, I think the thrill of "flying off to an island" is appealing? Little did anyone dream of just how many pirates still roam the landscape there and just how dangerous Aruba really is.



The "beautiful beaches" are for the most part manmade and developed primarily by the resorts which are mostly American franchises.  They are NOT naturally occurring beaches at all.  I wonder if they have to be maintained or if they would revert to the way the rest of the island is if not maintained by off-shore dredging, etc. should the big hotels cut back or even decide to leave because of lack of business.  

That is why the rest of the island looks as it does, that is how it was before "development" created the resort area.  More of the desert isle than any tropical paradise for sure.  Even the vegetation is stunted, warped by the wind and of the semi-arid variety.  I have been told that the soil is even very poor in many areas with high salt content.  Basically a big block of salt onto which some soil has accumulated over time.  Aruba owes a lot to tourism, that's for sure.   :roll:
]

So to put it simply, there are some Americans with a lot to lose if a boycott of Aruba is successful. That might explain the motivation of some people who are so opposed to Natalee's family and the boycott itself.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #522 9/10 - 9/12/2006
Post by: Anna on September 10, 2006, 04:50:20 PM
Quote from: "Shizaru"
I certainly was not suggesting that Natalee was in any way to blame.  The reason it matters why she got in the car, whether she was willing or drugged, is that her condition and state of mind is relevant to what occurred after that, where they took her and how she died.  I think that she got in the car willingly, because her judgment was seriously impaired by alcohol.  I don't think she knew what kind of effect a 151 shot would have on someone her size.  I think she knew she was getting into a private vehicle, not likely she'd mistake a car parked behind the building for a cab.  However I don't think she expected anything more when she got in the car, than a ride back to her hotel with maybe some making out on the way.  Maybe she thought Joran was cute and wanted a little romance on her last night on the island, maybe she was trying to make some MBer jealous, maybe it was both.  Either way I think she was a good girl who trusted the wrong person and paid for it with her life.  I don't think this was a planned crime tho.  If that is the case why were 2K Joran's third choice?  Are Andre and Florencia part of the rape gang too?  And why were 2K giving away that they weren't cab drivers by coming in and drinking with Joran?  Frankly this "20 times before quote" is being used dishonestly.  Joran was not saying they had committed rape 20 times before, just that they had picked up tourist girls 20 times before.  I think the plan that night was the same as the other 20 times,  find some drunk tourist girls, have Joran get them even drunker by buying them some 151 shots, then offer them a ride back to their hotel and see what happened.  Maybe I'm wrong but I think there is far too much uniformity of opinion on the pro-family boards that this was a premeditated abduction by a well-organized pimp squad, the alternative that it was a crime of opportunity doesn't even get 5% as much attention.  Which is unfortunate because there is certainly plenty of circumstantial evidence pointing to the latter, and which sort of crime it was makes a difference as to which scenarios are more plausible when trying to determine what ultimately happened to her.



Shizaru,

I appreciate all the hard work you have put into your timeline complete with statements inserted at the proper points and all the rest.

Certainly, I have considered the above but must respectfully say it is not in keeping with what we know of Natalee's personality, what I see with my own eyes as far as Joran and the fact that I just do not find him nearly as believable as you seem to find him.  In fact, I think he is the consummate pathological liar and much of your theory rests on the validity of statements made only by him or him in concert with his PIMPle friends and contrary to logic even in many instances by my own reasoning.  While I can see where you are coming from and agree to a certain extent it was a crime of opportunity, they laid a trap and it worked.  Had it not worked so well, yes, they might have had to return home empty handed.  But they had ample time to refine their technique over time and this was only Natalee's third day on that island.  No time to build the defenses to counter the trap.

But we can agree to disagree and still share information and work together which is the nice thing about a friendly forum which this one is, at least on occasion.   8)

I do know young men having reared a few of them myself and I just smell a rat with Joran's every word.  This is a game the locals played on the tourist girls and it is ugly and predatory and mean and very very dangerous.  As for Florie being involved, why not?  Loco Stephie surely was.  Drugged with Roofies or drugged with excessive alcohol, same thing in my book, he knew what 151 would do from his past experimentation with girls.  And if he admits to twenty times, I would guess it is more like forty.  They have been playing this game for a while it would appear.  Not just these three but many of the locals.

I think the reason Joran couldn't make up his mind as to whether or not to say Natalee was drunk or not is that he could not wrap his brain around it being illegal to have sex with a girl passed out from alcohol for after all she drank it herself so anything goes after that, right?  Wrong, but he didn't understand that being the chauvinist piglet that he is.  

If she drank it, it was her fault whatever happened while she might be passed out from booze was his thinking and that of, sadly, many men in this old world.  Raping somebody while they are passed out from ANY reason is the same, wrong, just as robbing them or beating them or committing any other crime against them would be but Joran didn't really believe that and so he kept changing her state in the beginning until somebody, likely Paulus, straightened him out on that detail.  

Paulus may have had to look that one up himself as it seems to be the prevailing attitude on that island that if you can get the booze/drugs down the girl's throat, it is a license to do as one pleases after that.

If the girls are drinking, they leave themselves open to any kind of attack these predators care to execute seems to be the prevailing attitude and that is just so wrong especially in a resort area but also universally.

With criminal law for his hobby, I think Joran had been thinking of alternatives all along and just what he would do when.  He even admitted I believe mid June that he and Deepak agreed to lots of chatter to make for an alibi.  Very little of this was spontaneous, it was a replay of the past and improvised as they gained experience.

All, in my most humble of opinions as always and I do respect yours as well.  I see where you are coming from but don't follow.  For example, if Natalee wanted to make some boy jealous, her friends would have been all over that even if she did not tell them so.  Girls just pick up on that like anything and even seem to imagine it at times.  And they would tell for sure, too.  Just the sort of thing they would tell, in fact.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #522 9/10 - 9/12/2006
Post by: mrs. red on September 10, 2006, 04:55:40 PM
Quote from: "Shell"
Good day you all.
 :)

The 3 boys describe the (one)security guard in their statements.  Yet 2 security guards are arrested. I would think the 3 boys would have to identify the security guard after he was arrested. Surely that is grounds for filing some major charges against the boys. That alone could have had grave consequenses for those 2 guards. False information by the 3, fingering 2 innocent men.

Excellent point Shell.... I don't ever focus on the security guard story, because we all know it's bunk... but as you point this out... just goes to show how sloppy they all were...


Title: Lively Case Discussion #522 9/10 - 9/12/2006
Post by: Smish on September 10, 2006, 04:56:05 PM
Quote from: "klaasend"
Quote from: "Smish"
I, Dennis Dominico JACOBS, head agent at the Korps Police force Aruba and at the Atraco team classified, explain the following.

On Tuesday, May 31, 2005, at 19:20, I interrogated and took a witness statement from the man named:

Satish Sharma KALPOE

born in Surinam on July 30 1986, without profession student at (H4I Colegio Arubano) and residing in Hooiberg number 91-B on Aruba.

Are in Dutch taken off declaration by me, JACOBS, in Dutch it was translated, were put on record and sound as follows:

This doesn't sound like Dennis Jacobs interrogated Satish to me.Does anyone know what the bolded part above means?

He did.  The only thing that is confusing is why would he need to translate into Dutch a statement that was already taken in Dutch.  It could be an error in the Dutch statement.  Maybe the statement was taken in Papiamento, like Deepak's was then translated by Jacobs to Dutch.  All statement must be translated for submission to Dutch.

OIC,but why does it say"taken off declaration by me"?And why did only Jacobs take this statement?


Title: Lively Case Discussion #522 9/10 - 9/12/2006
Post by: friend of monkeys on September 10, 2006, 04:56:36 PM
i gotta go...see u monkeys later


Title: Lively Case Discussion #522 9/10 - 9/12/2006
Post by: klaasend on September 10, 2006, 04:57:29 PM
Quote from: "Smish"
Quote from: "klaasend"
Quote from: "Smish"
I, Dennis Dominico JACOBS, head agent at the Korps Police force Aruba and at the Atraco team classified, explain the following.

On Tuesday, May 31, 2005, at 19:20, I interrogated and took a witness statement from the man named:

Satish Sharma KALPOE

born in Surinam on July 30 1986, without profession student at (H4I Colegio Arubano) and residing in Hooiberg number 91-B on Aruba.

Are in Dutch taken off declaration by me, JACOBS, in Dutch it was translated, were put on record and sound as follows:

This doesn't sound like Dennis Jacobs interrogated Satish to me.Does anyone know what the bolded part above means?

He did.  The only thing that is confusing is why would he need to translate into Dutch a statement that was already taken in Dutch.  It could be an error in the Dutch statement.  Maybe the statement was taken in Papiamento, like Deepak's was then translated by Jacobs to Dutch.  All statement must be translated for submission to Dutch.

OIC,but why does it say"taken off declaration by me"?And why did only Jacobs take this statement?

I have no clue why ONLY Dennis Jacobs took Satish's statement.  I wondered about that as well.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #522 9/10 - 9/12/2006
Post by: mrs. red on September 10, 2006, 04:59:27 PM
Bye FOM.. check your email...pls.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #522 9/10 - 9/12/2006
Post by: Anna on September 10, 2006, 05:00:17 PM
Quote from: "BTgirl"
[So to put it simply, there are some Americans with a lot to lose if a boycott of Aruba is successful. That might explain the motivation of some people who are so opposed to Natalee's family and the boycott itself.



I believe most of the development took place in the 1980's but sure, there would be plenty of US$$ involved not only in that but in the Timeshares there which I think is what we may see more of on internet forums.

Interestingly, state retirement plans often in the past had been sort of hawking timeshares and even in Aruba.  Little mentioned fact that the state retirement plans of both Alabama and Georgia to name two had at least exposed retirees to the possibility of investing in timeshares there.  Guess that is an off the record kind of thing and not sanctioned by the State Governments but I do know it happened.   :roll: Sort of like investing in private IRA with that being a way to make your retirement grow, etc.  Not necessarily buying an actual time share but investing in the holding companies that own them, etc.

So lots of money invested then and now and in lots of ways one would not think of or that are not readily apparent at first glance.  Sure hope not many went that route.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #522 9/10 - 9/12/2006
Post by: the big hammer on September 10, 2006, 05:00:40 PM
Now TWO Perjury/False Witness Prosecutions Are Available

As both 5/31/05 kalpoe statements are defined as "WITNESS" statements, they are both liable and open to perjury, obstruction of justice and contempt of court charges.

In fact -- they are openly exposed and vulnerable to these charges.

How Karen Jannsen fails to prosecute one of them for these obvious crimes -- and now proven in their own "WITNESS" statements, is shameful and a disaster for Aruba, and the Aruban judiciary.

This is an outright sham.  One cannot give an INTENTIONALLY FALSE statement as witness in a capital crime case and completely escape penalty.  And in many cases, those penalties would be severe, and would include years in jail and heavy fines.

Unbelievable that Jannsen has sat on these available prosecutions for 15+ months.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #522 9/10 - 9/12/2006
Post by: Kat_Gram on September 10, 2006, 05:13:46 PM
Oh, there was some coaching in there by Paulus so that Joran
would not be the last one to be seen with her. Way sooner than I thought earlier. The night that he takes the bag to Joran... whch Joran never mentions. He mentions everything else, the big clock at the Wyndham,,,, yadda yadda yadda. And it seems as if they never asked anything further. If Joran had been detained on " suspicion " sooner than June 9, 2005, then he might have lost his year ? Do you think ?


Title: Lively Case Discussion #522 9/10 - 9/12/2006
Post by: Anna on September 10, 2006, 05:19:19 PM
.
HAMMER,
If Arlene is to be believed at all, the Witnesses status later being elevated to SUSPECTS supersedes the witness element of their statement.  In other words, it would seem to give them permission to not only lie but obstruct justice in any manner they please and even extends to members of their immediate family.

I noted Spock and others yesterday saying this is total BS and while I agree it is totally illogical and I have never encountered anything like it, that is what she said and how she explained it.  I can't help it or do anything about it but that is just how she explained it in one of her "You don't understand our system" lectures.


Later, we learn from that same source also that much is LOCAL POLICY and not actually Dutch law at all.  So I wonder just who sets this so-called Local Policy and if this, too, falls under that rather than the letter of the law.  Lots of things seem to fall through that crack and must be the size of the Grand Canyon.  And at the time we did not realize Arlene was the cousin of Guido, fellow PIMP or whatever of Joran.

So we are also dealing with the concept of Local Policy.

In order to bring charges or prosecute, Karin Jaanssen would have to WANT to do so.  Obviously, she doesn't.  How any judge could read this and release all is also something to think about as well.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #522 9/10 - 9/12/2006
Post by: memphis on September 10, 2006, 05:25:13 PM
Quote from: "Shizaru"
I certainly was not suggesting that Natalee was in any way to blame.  The reason it matters why she got in the car, whether she was willing or drugged, is that her condition and state of mind is relevant to what occured after that, where they took her and how she died.  I think that she got in the car willingly, because her judgement was seriously impaired by alcohol.  I don't think she knew what kind of effect a 151 shot would have on someone her size.  I think she knew she was getting into a private vehicle, not likely she'd mistake a car parked behind the building for a cab.  However I don't think she expected anything more when she got in the car, than a ride back to her hotel with maybe some making out on the way.  Maybe she thought Joran was cute and wanted a little romance on her last night on the island, maybe she was trying to make some MBer jealous, maybe it was both.  Either way I think she was a good girl who trusted the wrong person and paid for it with her life.  I don't think this was a planned crime tho.  If that is the case why were 2K Joran's third choice?  Are Andre and Florencia part of the rape gang too?  And why were 2K giving away that they weren't cab drivers by coming in and drinking with Joran?  Frankly this "20 times before quote" is being used dishonestly.  Joran was not saying they had committed rape 20 times before, just that they had picked up tourist girls 20 times before.  I think the plan that night was the same as the other 20 times,  find some drunk tourist girls, have Joran get them even drunker by buying them some 151 shots, then offer them a ride back to their hotel and see what happened.  Maybe I'm wrong but I think there is far too much uniformity of opinion on the pro-family boards that this was a premediated abduction by a well-organized pimp squad, the alternative that it was a crime of opportunity doesn't even get 5% as much attention.  Which is unfortunate because there is certainly plenty of circumstantial evidence pointing to the latter, and which sort of crime it was makes a difference as to which scenarios are more plausable when trying to determine what ultimately happened to her.


Shizaru
I, for one, respect and appreciate your very logical posts and try to "listen" carefully when you post. It takes some courage to go against the flow, but I think you have made a great point above. I did not take any offense to your theory and in no way thought you were blaming the victim. I also think it is very important that we have different opinions on the board. As I have said before, everyone has different strengths and talents. If we were all the same, or thought the same way, we would all fall into the same pit (make the same mistakes). Thanks for your persistance in getting your balancing thoughts on the board.


Now...and this is not a "BUT" :lol: ....

If I entertain your theory, I don't know what to do with the Kalpoes. If Natalee was alone with Joran when she died; if it was not a premeditated pimp event; if Natalee went willing and was not deceived or drugged, wouldn't that make the Kalpoes innocent of any wrongdoing? What would keep them from publicly proclaiming their innocence? Your thoughts?


Title: Lively Case Discussion #522 9/10 - 9/12/2006
Post by: Tylergal on September 10, 2006, 05:31:39 PM
Quote from: "Anna"
Quote from: "BTgirl"
[So to put it simply, there are some Americans with a lot to lose if a boycott of Aruba is successful. That might explain the motivation of some people who are so opposed to Natalee's family and the boycott itself.



I believe most of the development took place in the 1980's but sure, there would be plenty of US$$ involved not only in that but in the Timeshares there which I think is what we may see more of on internet forums.

Interestingly, state retirement plans often in the past had been sort of hawking timeshares and even in Aruba.  Little mentioned fact that the state retirement plans of both Alabama and Georgia to name two had at least exposed retirees to the possibility of investing in timeshares there.  Guess that is an off the record kind of thing and not sanctioned by the State Governments but I do know it happened.   :roll: Sort of like investing in private IRA with that being a way to make your retirement grow, etc.  Not necessarily buying an actual time share but investing in the holding companies that own them, etc.

So lots of money invested then and now and in lots of ways one would not think of or that are not readily apparent at first glance.  Sure hope not many went that route.


Anna, I was there in early 1982 and everything was booming.  Construction everywhere.  I went back a few years later.  I think early 1990 and was amazed at how the island had taken shape, and how poorly it appeared the locals were living.  The squallor in which the locals live had gotten worse by the time I returned, and the high rose motels and other things were in full swing.  There were two worlds and they had not met except on the drug circuit and drugs were pushed at everyone, everywhere and yet the locals still lived in worse conditions than the noticeably poverty stricken areas of New Orleans as you enter from the Interstate.  In fact, New Orleans at its worse was better than the conditions many Arubans lived in and yet, there was the other side of the island, the other side of the story.  So much poverty and yet so much wealth.  The development and the money was wasted on those who had who could use even more without paying a decent wage to those who had not.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #522 9/10 - 9/12/2006
Post by: LilPuma on September 10, 2006, 05:33:44 PM
Quote from: "JA"
Shizaru,

I agree with you that the case is simplier than many are amking it out to be.  The cover-up of the case though reaches farther implications and involves many more.  The cover-up deals with a corrupt island that covers up more than the NH case and is controled by a minority of those who see themselves as the elite if the island.

-Joran is an out of control teen who is promiscious, gambles, drin ks heavily,and possibly does drugs.  He has his mother and father wrapped around his finger and has for many years.  EWither that or they are afraid of him.

-Joran uses people whether they be for rides a convenient friendship, or women for the use of partying and sex.

-Joran has picked up tourist women at least 20 times for his own pleasure and/or possibly his close circle of friends.  he takes advantage or a drunk tourist or possibly helps this along with the use of more drugs/alcohol.  If he can get "lucky" and get the girl without alcohol, so be it.  His activities may range from heavy petting, intercourse, date rape, and possibly videotaping/photographing.  He truthfully thinks nothing of this because in his eyes he sees himself irresistable and never sees the women again so doesn't have to face the reality of what he did.  I imagine he treats gfs much the same way.  He is manipulative and comes off as charming when all women ( tourist and island girls) first meet him.  The tourist girls go home he goes for the next conquest.

-The boys pick up Natalee with no other plan than the above.  She is a nice girl who unfortunately uses poor judgement under the influence of drugs(GHB)/alcohol and at the time thinks she will shortly be returning to her hotel or being intoxicated is thinking of nothing but the moment.

-I doubt Nat welcomed the contact the boys describe in the car.  I do not see Natalee ( from what we know of her) b3ehaving that way with two other males in the car.  Maybe some kissing, but that is about it.  She was either unaware of her surrounding, semi-unconscious, or resisting.

-Somewhere along the line Natalee either had a bad reaction from the drugs/alcohol, or she tried to get away and was injured.  Those with her at the time did not see medical attention for her she died quickly.  I assume there was more unwanted sexual contact with Joran and possibly the Deepak/Satish.

-At sometime I feel Nat was at the sloots.  She may have already been dead or in a bad physical condition ( very intoxicated/injured.)

-Paulus was called in to assist Joran and or the boys and the disposal and cover-up begins.  In order to protect Joran, Paulus threatens the Kalpoes because they were either directly involved or by association.  He tells them he will assist them with an alibi and lawyer fees.  They get in over their head.  They see Joran getting off, so they have no reason to come forward with the truth.

-The island polis department and politicains are corrupt. Many favors are paid, many threaten to uncover past deeds and favors.  Lower level politicains and poils want to keep their jobs, all keep quiet.  A few know exactly what happened, many probably have a pretty accurate idea of what happened, but again. to keep the island happy, one must stay quiet.


The only thing I disagree with here is I do believe that Joran actually hurt Natalee.  We've heard of his temper from Anita (as reported by Greta and Beth), the Warden of the Kia, and various rumors about encounters with tourists (girl - knife, boy - window of Dunkin Donuts - one of the MB boys).  Joran has expressed animosity towards Americans, his parents not only don't say "no", but they enable him to feel entitled and narcissistic.  I think Natalee, if she was conscious, said no, screamed or resisted and he "shut her up" (like Rudy Croes said he wanted to do to Beth).  I don't think he intended to kill her, but I do think she died at the hands of Joran vdSloot.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #522 9/10 - 9/12/2006
Post by: Anna on September 10, 2006, 05:39:02 PM
.
LilPuma,

I tend to agree that SOMETHING had to have happened to create the need for the professional cover-up.  Hard to believe this would have been done over an overdose for they would have just said Natalee took the drugs or drank the alcohol or whatever herself.

But as MsMarple's sig line asks, why disappear the remains if they had nothing to hide.  Why lie if they did nothing wrong?  Why cover up at all unless they had a very good reason to do so.

.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #522 9/10 - 9/12/2006
Post by: Tylergal on September 10, 2006, 05:41:26 PM
I very much respect Shizaru and appreciate all the hard work but I do believe Natalee was set up.  It is not coincidental that we see the Casino vidoes with a dealer seemingly giving a high sign to what appears to be Paulus.  It is not coincidental that immediately Joran's plan goes into action.  It is not coincidental that his arrival at C&Cs was very near closing time.  It is not coincidental that they all lied saying about the guards, about the timing, about drivers and I am not sure this same incident has played about 20 times before, but I think something similar, minus the death of a girl who rebuffed the advances of the sporter son of the wannta-be-judge and his wanna-be-miss-socialite with the see-thru-blouse.  It is not coincidental that they all want to blame the "white-haired," "white girl," 'niece of Hitler" who wanted "to see sharks," "who wanted to remain in Aruba."  These are all lies meant to prop up their lies, as Joran had done so many times with his superiors and parents, the enablers.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #522 9/10 - 9/12/2006
Post by: Anna on September 10, 2006, 05:41:50 PM
.
My, those Kelpoe boys are certainly into the fabric fiber content to both comment that the pants were cotton.  Nothing but natural fibers for those guards, huh?   :roll:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #522 9/10 - 9/12/2006
Post by: memphis on September 10, 2006, 05:59:01 PM
Quote from: "Spock"
Quote from: "San"
Karin Janssen herself was the one who brought premeditation into the picture.


She is legally correct, if you arrive at a bar thirty minutes before closing, buy a girl the equivalent of six drinks in thirty minutes, offer to drive her back to the hotel, she never gets there, and is never seen again, the subsequent crime is never considered accidental, it is legally a premeditated action. The crime is no longer a crime of opportunity, it is considered premeditated. Thus the suspicion of premeditated murder. The purpose of the liquor was the same as a narcotic: remove the girls ability to consent.


Thank you for this info, Spock.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #522 9/10 - 9/12/2006
Post by: memphis on September 10, 2006, 06:06:18 PM
Quote from: "klaasend"
Quote from: "Spock"
Quote from: "San"
Karin Janssen herself was the one who brought premeditation into the picture.


She is legally correct, if you arrive at a bar thirty minutes before closing, buy a girl the equivalent of six drinks in thirty minutes, offer to drive her back to the hotel, she never gets there, and is never seen again, the subsequent crime is never considered accidental, it is legally a premeditated action. The crime is no longer a crime of opportunity, it is considered premeditated. Thus the suspicion of premeditated murder. The purpose of the liquor was the same as a narcotic: remove the girls ability to consent.


Wolf Hunting Tactics

Wolves are primarily nocturnal animals that avoid the heat of day. They generally commence hunting at dusk.

Wolves detect prey by three primary means, sent (most common), tracking, and chance encounters.

After prey is detected, wolves may split up to search through brush, travel on ridge tops searching for the prey below, or test herds looking for signs of weakness.

It has long been recognized that wolves often take advantage of weak members of the herd. In 1804, Captain Clark of the famed Lewis and Clark expedition wrote that prairie wolves followed buffalo and fed "on those that are killed by accident or those that are too pore or fat to keep up with the ganges."

Just thought this was an interresting comparison  :wink:


 :shock:  Good comparison.  :lol:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #522 9/10 - 9/12/2006
Post by: Spock on September 10, 2006, 06:19:58 PM
Don't believe for a minute that Janssen cant charge and prosecute the "witnesses" for signing false declarations. There is no truth to the "supercede" theory or any other BS you might hear. They lied, it led to the false arrest of others, it took the heat off of them for awhile, and now its time to prosecute. Charges please.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #522 9/10 - 9/12/2006
Post by: Ono on September 10, 2006, 06:22:25 PM
Quote from: "Spock"
Don't believe for a minute that Janssen cant charge and prosecute the "witnesses" for signing false declarations. There is no truth to the "supercede" theory or any other BS you might hear. They lied, it led to the false arrest of others, it took the heat off of them for awhile, and now its time to prosecute. Charges please.


That's what I think too...in fact, it's way past time to prosecute.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #522 9/10 - 9/12/2006
Post by: Ono on September 10, 2006, 06:27:13 PM
Quote from: "Kat_Gram"
Oh, there was some coaching in there by Paulus so that Joran
would not be the last one to be seen with her. Way sooner than I thought earlier. The night that he takes the bag to Joran... whch Joran never mentions. He mentions everything else, the big clock at the Wyndham,,,, yadda yadda yadda. And it seems as if they never asked anything further. If Joran had been detained on " suspicion " sooner than June 9, 2005, then he might have lost his year ? Do you think ?


I'm think the first meeting to begin 'getting the stories straight' was right before Beth landed on Aruba...at the Racquet Club. I don't believe Paulus' bag excuse for going to the club.  That's the first Fabrication Meeting began, in my opinion.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #522 9/10 - 9/12/2006
Post by: San on September 10, 2006, 06:28:20 PM
Quote from: "Anna"
.
HAMMER,
If Arlene is to be believed at all, the Witnesses status later being elevated to SUSPECTS supersedes the witness element of their statement.  In other words, it would seem to give them permission to not only lie but obstruct justice in any manner they please and even extends to members of their immediate family.

I noted Spock and others yesterday saying this is total BS and while I agree it is totally illogical and I have never encountered anything like it, that is what she said and how she explained it.  I can't help it or do anything about it but that is just how she explained it in one of her "You don't understand our system" lectures.


Later, we learn from that same source also that much is LOCAL POLICY and not actually Dutch law at all.  So I wonder just who sets this so-called Local Policy and if this, too, falls under that rather than the letter of the law.  Lots of things seem to fall through that crack and must be the size of the Grand Canyon.  And at the time we did not realize Arlene was the cousin of Guido, fellow PIMP or whatever of Joran.

So we are also dealing with the concept of Local Policy.

In order to bring charges or prosecute, Karin Jaanssen would have to WANT to do so.  Obviously, she doesn't.  How any judge could read this and release all is also something to think about as well.

I agree Anna.

In my opinion Karin Janssen did not do her job.  I am beginning to wonder if KJ is related to one of the suspects or someone involved in what happened that we don't know about.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #522 9/10 - 9/12/2006
Post by: San on September 10, 2006, 06:31:11 PM
Quote from: "Tylergal"
I very much respect Shizaru and appreciate all the hard work but I do believe Natalee was set up.  It is not coincidental that we see the Casino vidoes with a dealer seemingly giving a high sign to what appears to be Paulus.  It is not coincidental that immediately Joran's plan goes into action.  It is not coincidental that his arrival at C&Cs was very near closing time.  It is not coincidental that they all lied saying about the guards, about the timing, about drivers and I am not sure this same incident has played about 20 times before, but I think something similar, minus the death of a girl who rebuffed the advances of the sporter son of the wannta-be-judge and his wanna-be-miss-socialite with the see-thru-blouse.  It is not coincidental that they all want to blame the "white-haired," "white girl," 'niece of Hitler" who wanted "to see sharks," "who wanted to remain in Aruba."  These are all lies meant to prop up their lies, as Joran had done so many times with his superiors and parents, the enablers.

I agree.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #522 9/10 - 9/12/2006
Post by: San on September 10, 2006, 06:35:54 PM
Quote from: "Anna"
.
My, those Kelpoe boys are certainly into the fabric fiber content to both comment that the pants were cotton.  Nothing but natural fibers for those guards, huh?   :roll:

What kid would say he had cotton pants on.  Right there we know someone is helping them write these statements.  If you ask a kid what kind of pants he had on they would say he had black pants on.  Were they that good in giving details that they could even read the label on the pants.  I wonder if they knew what temperature they should wash them on or what size they were :roll:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #522 9/10 - 9/12/2006
Post by: Spock on September 10, 2006, 06:35:55 PM
Quote from: "Ono"
Quote from: "Spock"
Don't believe for a minute that Janssen cant charge and prosecute the "witnesses" for signing false declarations. There is no truth to the "supercede" theory or any other BS you might hear. They lied, it led to the false arrest of others, it took the heat off of them for awhile, and now its time to prosecute. Charges please.


That's what I think too...in fact, it's way past time to prosecute.


Nancy Grace had a Dutch law professor on the show last fall and he clarified three points: (1) if there are false witness statements they can and should be charged for obstruction, (2) making false declarations is a serious crime resulting in jail time (3) plea bargaining is allowed at the discretion of the prosecutor, the judge, and the defense attorney.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #522 9/10 - 9/12/2006
Post by: San on September 10, 2006, 06:37:12 PM
Quote from: "Spock"
Don't believe for a minute that Janssen cant charge and prosecute the "witnesses" for signing false declarations. There is no truth to the "supercede" theory or any other BS you might hear. They lied, it led to the false arrest of others, it took the heat off of them for awhile, and now its time to prosecute. Charges please.

I agree.  Forget the murder rap let's go with the lesser charge.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #522 9/10 - 9/12/2006
Post by: Anna on September 10, 2006, 06:42:41 PM
Quote from: "San"
Quote from: "Anna"
.
My, those Kelpoe boys are certainly into the fabric fiber content to both comment that the pants were cotton.  Nothing but natural fibers for those guards, huh?   :roll:

What kid would say he had cotton pants on.  Right there we know someone is helping them write these statements.  If you ask a kid what kind of pants he had on they would say he had black pants on.  Were they that good in giving details that they could even read the label on the pants.  I wonder if they knew what temperature they should wash them on or what size they were :roll:



No, boys this age and even older NEVER read the label!!  I find the labels say things like hand wash, dry flat on little T Shirts sometimes like they are going to do that?  

Most I would venture could not name five different types of fabric either.  Not if still living at home as these were doing.  So odd they both said "cotton pants" instead of long pants or just pants or solid-colored pants, etc.

.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #522 9/10 - 9/12/2006
Post by: Anna on September 10, 2006, 06:49:18 PM
.
I was once chewed out and royally for misspelling supersede so just to be sure we are all on the same page with this, it is tricky being the only sede word in the English language but it is indeed supersede:

Dictionary.com Unabridged (v 1.0.1) - Cite This Source new!
su‧per‧sede  /ˌsupərˈsid/ Pronunciation Key - Show Spelled Pronunciation[soo-per-seed] Pronunciation Key - Show IPA Pronunciation

–verb (used with object), -sed‧ed, -sed‧ing. 1. to replace in power, authority, effectiveness, acceptance, use, etc., as by another person or thing.  
2. to set aside or cause to be set aside as void, useless, or obsolete, usually in favor of something mentioned; make obsolete: They superseded the old statute with a new one.  
3. to succeed to the position, function, office, etc., of; supplant.  


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

[Origin: 1485–95; < L supersedēre to sit above or upon, forbear, equiv. to super- super- + sedēre to sit1]

—Related forms
su‧per‧sed‧a‧ble, adjective
su‧per‧sed‧er, noun


—Synonyms 1. See replace. 2. void, overrule, annul, revoke, rescind.
Dictionary.com Unabridged (v 1.0.1)
Based on the Random House Unabridged Dictionary, © Random House, Inc. 2006.
American Heritage Dictionary - Cite This Source new! su·per·sede (spr-sd)  Pronunciation Key    
tr.v. su·per·sed·ed, su·per·sed·ing, su·per·sedes
To take the place of; replace.
To cause to be set aside, especially to displace as inferior or antiquated. See Synonyms at replace.


[Middle English superceden, to postpone, from Old French superceder, from Latin supersedre, to refrain from  : super-, super- + sedre, to sit; see sed- in Indo-European Roots.]
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
super·seder n.
super·session (-sshn) n.

(Download Now or Buy the Book) The American Heritage® Dictionary of the English Language, Fourth Edition
Copyright © 2000 by Houghton Mifflin Company.
Published by Houghton Mifflin Company. All rights reserved.
Merriam-Webster's Dictionary of Law - Cite This Source new!
Main Entry: su·per·sede
Pronunciation: "sü-p&r-'sEd
Function: transitive verb
Inflected Forms: -sed·ed; -sed·ing
1 : to subject to postponement or suspension; especially : to suspend the operation of (a judgment or order) by means of a supersedeas
2 : to take the place of in authority : PREEMPT, OVERRIDE
3 : to take the place of and render null or ineffective

Merriam-Webster's Dictionary of Law, © 1996 Merriam-Webster, Inc.
WordNet - Cite This Source new!
supersede

v : take the place or move into the position of; "Smith replaced Miller as CEO after Miller left"; "the computer has supplanted the slide rule"; "Mary replaced Susan as the team's captain and the highest-ranked player in the school" [syn: supplant, replace, supervene upon]

WordNet ® 2.0, © 2003 Princeton University


Title: Lively Case Discussion #522 9/10 - 9/12/2006
Post by: Anna on September 10, 2006, 06:59:31 PM
Quote from: "Spock"
Quote from: "Ono"
Quote from: "Spock"
Don't believe for a minute that Janssen cant charge and prosecute the "witnesses" for signing false declarations. There is no truth to the "supercede" theory or any other BS you might hear. They lied, it led to the false arrest of others, it took the heat off of them for awhile, and now its time to prosecute. Charges please.


That's what I think too...in fact, it's way past time to prosecute.


Nancy Grace had a Dutch law professor on the show last fall and he clarified three points: (1) if there are false witness statements they can and should be charged for obstruction, (2) making false declarations is a serious crime resulting in jail time (3) plea bargaining is allowed at the discretion of the prosecutor, the judge, and the defense attorney.


Again, I do understand what you are saying and what you heard.  I do not understand how any judiciary or law enforcement agency could even begin to conduct an investigation with permitting false statements to be made with complete impunity.  But in order to prosecute, KJ has to see it as such and also as worthwhile for we know in this country many times perjury is overlooked in the prosecution of a greater crime.

I suppose KJ would say she did not do so as the case is still open and she is hoping to bring greater charges eventually.  And there is that Local Policy deal which seems to mean they will bend, twist or whatever the law to suit their immediate purpose and need.  Yes, I think she COULD do it but do I think she will?  In a word, no.  This is a woman who actually wrote to our Justice Department and asked if Beth Twitty could be related to Hitler so much does she buy into her friend's son's stories.


Does anyone else ever wonder if ALE is miffed about the Dutch coming in and are leaking these statements for some nefarious purpose?  Maybe they can't be used in court if leaked or they are trying to prove they really did question the suspects and don't realize how bad these statements make them look?  So far looks to me as though these statements could have all been taken if a very few days.  How long could it take for that one of Satish for example?  Half an hour tops maybe?


Title: Lively Case Discussion #522 9/10 - 9/12/2006
Post by: Anna on September 10, 2006, 07:02:33 PM
As Easy would sing,
~All Alone Am I. . .. . ~

BBL maybe when there are more here.

 8)


Title: Lively Case Discussion #522 9/10 - 9/12/2006
Post by: San on September 10, 2006, 07:05:14 PM
Quote from: "Anna"
As Easy would sing,
~All Alone Am I. . .. . ~

BBL maybe when there are more here.

 8)

You are not alone Anna I just am running back and forth to my computer between chores.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #522 9/10 - 9/12/2006
Post by: nonesuche on September 10, 2006, 07:06:24 PM
Quote from: "San"
Quote from: "Spock"
Don't believe for a minute that Janssen cant charge and prosecute the "witnesses" for signing false declarations. There is no truth to the "supercede" theory or any other BS you might hear. They lied, it led to the false arrest of others, it took the heat off of them for awhile, and now its time to prosecute. Charges please.

I agree.  Forget the murder rap let's go with the lesser charge.


Oddly enough, if one believes what the former poster Daniel shared, it appears that kidnapping carries a greater probability for a longer sentence under Dutch and Aruban law, than murder does? Something related to pleas as he detailed it...

I don't know if anyone remembers that thread but he explained this in detail once upon a time.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #522 9/10 - 9/12/2006
Post by: memphis on September 10, 2006, 07:22:31 PM
Quote from: "bleachedblack"
Shizaru your post fits with my recent thoughts......the reason nothing is mentioned is because she was unconscious by this time.

It is unbelievable to think that none of the three TALKED while jailed and interrogated. I believe, if not in the first couple of months, then at some point since....one of the three have spilled the can of worms. hence the comments about carrying guns, and the completion of the case in a few weeks . The Netherlands knows they are going in after the big boys. Oraganized crime/cartel boys.......


 :shock:  I haven't ruled such a scenario out and it certainly fits with Holland bringing their guns. Also fits with Joran beating his chest, "What do you want me to do about it?"


Title: Lively Case Discussion #522 9/10 - 9/12/2006
Post by: Carnut on September 10, 2006, 07:37:27 PM
Quote from: "Anna"
.
I was once chewed out and royally for misspelling supersede so just to be sure we are all on the same page with this, it is tricky being the only sede word in the English language but it is indeed supersede:

Dictionary.com Unabridged (v 1.0.1) - Cite This Source new!
su‧per‧sede  /ˌsupərˈsid/ Pronunciation Key - Show Spelled Pronunciation[soo-per-seed] Pronunciation Key - Show IPA Pronunciation

–verb (used with object), -sed‧ed, -sed‧ing. 1. to replace in power, authority, effectiveness, acceptance, use, etc., as by another person or thing.  
2. to set aside or cause to be set aside as void, useless, or obsolete, usually in favor of something mentioned; make obsolete: They superseded the old statute with a new one.  
3. to succeed to the position, function, office, etc., of; supplant.  


Humm, I are hooked on phonics.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #522 9/10 - 9/12/2006
Post by: Florida on September 10, 2006, 07:42:35 PM
Quote from: "memphis"
Quote from: "bleachedblack"
Shizaru your post fits with my recent thoughts......the reason nothing is mentioned is because she was unconscious by this time.

It is unbelievable to think that none of the three TALKED while jailed and interrogated. I believe, if not in the first couple of months, then at some point since....one of the three have spilled the can of worms. hence the comments about carrying guns, and the completion of the case in a few weeks . The Netherlands knows they are going in after the big boys. Oraganized crime/cartel boys.......


 :shock:  I haven't ruled such a scenario out and it certainly fits with Holland bringing their guns. Also fits with Joran beating his chest, "What do you want me to do about it?"


I agree 1000%....The person responsible for Natalee's disappearance COULD be a Dutch citizen and why Interpol was called in. So...WHAT'S TAKING SO LONG?


Title: Lively Case Discussion #522 9/10 - 9/12/2006
Post by: Florida on September 10, 2006, 07:45:19 PM
That Monday morning two surf shop employees also "disappeared"

And the daily charter "Octopus" Trimaran went out & came back...
2 weeks later.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #522 9/10 - 9/12/2006
Post by: klaasend on September 10, 2006, 07:48:17 PM
Quote from: "Florida"
That Monday morning two surf shop employees also "disappeared"

And the daily charter "Octopus" Trimaran went out & came back...
2 weeks later.

I'm not sure about the surf shop employees.  The only person I've seen tell that story is SandraK and I don't put much creedance into her tales.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #522 9/10 - 9/12/2006
Post by: LilPuma on September 10, 2006, 07:53:06 PM
Quote from: "Anna"
.
LilPuma,

I tend to agree that SOMETHING had to have happened to create the need for the professional cover-up.  Hard to believe this would have been done over an overdose for they would have just said Natalee took the drugs or drank the alcohol or whatever herself.

But as MsMarple's sig line asks, why disappear the remains if they had nothing to hide.  Why lie if they did nothing wrong?  Why cover up at all unless they had a very good reason to do so.

.


That's what I think.  Once the 3 Pimps were arrested, Paulus and Croes were arrested and the media was in a frenzy, I think they would have come clean if they could pull off a "voluntary drug/alcohol induced overdose" or an accident of any kind.  There had to have been evidence of a crime - the car, the bloodstream, bruising, her clothes, somewhere, something.  It's clear that one of the main objectives in Aruba was to make sure that Joran finished high school (arrested after finals) and was able to start college on time (Judge did an about-face and let him leave for the Netherlands).   His punishment for being stupid and hurting a tourist was 3 months in jail - (really, Joran, even the druggies are told not to hurt the tourists).  So a slap on the wrist for obstruction, lying and hurting a tourist was 3 months in jail, even if that tourist was never seen again.  If not for folks like the Monkeys, that's the ONLY price he would have paid.  As it is, he's in something of a self-made prison and he's inspired a lot of influencial people to pursue this case.  When I hear and see the determination of people like Jossy, Dana, Klaas, Larry, Joe Mammana, Red and the Mrs., I start to believe that the van der Sloots and others in Aruba will, in fact, have to face the music.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #522 9/10 - 9/12/2006
Post by: LilPuma on September 10, 2006, 07:59:55 PM
Quote from: "Florida"

I agree 1000%....The person responsible for Natalee's disappearance COULD be a Dutch citizen and why Interpol was called in. So...WHAT'S TAKING SO LONG?


Unlike our FBI, I doubt the average cold case investigator in Holland is expected to be ready to pack up and ship out for a few months at a moment's notice.  They may have other cases that they need to close out or turn over to someone else.  I also suspect there are documents that have to be signed by Aruba and The Netherlands to ensure that the Dutch police have full police power and authority; it seems that was what Aruba had to agree to in order to get this help.   It sounded to me like the Dutch didn't want to be helpers, observers or consultants.  If they want Holland to do it, they need to really turn the power over to these investigators and that would require some kind of legal agreement.  :::shrug:::  Just my take on the situation.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #522 9/10 - 9/12/2006
Post by: San on September 10, 2006, 08:03:46 PM
Quote from: "LilPuma"
Quote from: "Florida"

I agree 1000%....The person responsible for Natalee's disappearance COULD be a Dutch citizen and why Interpol was called in. So...WHAT'S TAKING SO LONG?


Unlike our FBI, I doubt the average cold case investigator in Holland is expected to be ready to pack up and ship out for a few months at a moment's notice.  They may have other cases that they need to close out or turn over to someone else.  I also suspect there are documents that have to be signed by Aruba and The Netherlands to ensure that the Dutch police have full police power and authority; it seems that was what Aruba had to agree to in order to get this help.   It sounded to me like the Dutch didn't want to be helpers, observers or consultants.  If they want Holland to do it, they need to really turn the power over to these investigators and that would require some kind of legal agreement.  :::shrug:::  Just my take on the situation.

I hope the place where the Dutch team will be staying is always guarded.  I would bet anything that Aruba has the rooms, phones bugged.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #522 9/10 - 9/12/2006
Post by: LilPuma on September 10, 2006, 08:06:50 PM
Quote from: "Anna"
.


Later, we learn from that same source also that much is LOCAL POLICY and not actually Dutch law at all.  So I wonder just who sets this so-called Local Policy and if this, too, falls under that rather than the letter of the law.  Lots of things seem to fall through that crack and must be the size of the Grand Canyon.  And at the time we did not realize Arlene was the cousin of Guido, fellow PIMP or whatever of Joran.

So we are also dealing with the concept of Local Policy.



It's like the claims that anything leaked to the press or public cannot be used in a court of law in Aruba.   I find this very hard to believe, but people have repeated over and over that Beth talking to the media is what side-tracked this case.  I think I read on Aruba.com that the Prosecutor typically does not talk to the media.  That's a long haul from can't be used in court if it gets out to the media.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #522 9/10 - 9/12/2006
Post by: LilPuma on September 10, 2006, 08:10:25 PM
Quote from: "San"
Quote from: "LilPuma"
Quote from: "Florida"

I agree 1000%....The person responsible for Natalee's disappearance COULD be a Dutch citizen and why Interpol was called in. So...WHAT'S TAKING SO LONG?


Unlike our FBI, I doubt the average cold case investigator in Holland is expected to be ready to pack up and ship out for a few months at a moment's notice.  They may have other cases that they need to close out or turn over to someone else.  I also suspect there are documents that have to be signed by Aruba and The Netherlands to ensure that the Dutch police have full police power and authority; it seems that was what Aruba had to agree to in order to get this help.   It sounded to me like the Dutch didn't want to be helpers, observers or consultants.  If they want Holland to do it, they need to really turn the power over to these investigators and that would require some kind of legal agreement.  :::shrug:::  Just my take on the situation.

I hope the place where the Dutch team will be staying is always guarded.  I would bet anything that Aruba has the rooms, phones bugged.


I think they should ask the FBI to help them guard any statements, evidence and sweep the premises every day.  They could also help keep an eye on witnesses to make sure that after talking to the Dutch, they don't get a surprise visit from Jacobs or anyone else.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #522 9/10 - 9/12/2006
Post by: San on September 10, 2006, 08:12:25 PM
Quote from: "LilPuma"
Quote from: "Anna"
.


Later, we learn from that same source also that much is LOCAL POLICY and not actually Dutch law at all.  So I wonder just who sets this so-called Local Policy and if this, too, falls under that rather than the letter of the law.  Lots of things seem to fall through that crack and must be the size of the Grand Canyon.  And at the time we did not realize Arlene was the cousin of Guido, fellow PIMP or whatever of Joran.

So we are also dealing with the concept of Local Policy.



It's like the claims that anything leaked to the press or public cannot be used in a court of law in Aruba.  I find this very hard to believe, but people have repeated over and over that Beth talking to the media is what side-tracked this case.  I think I read on Aruba.com that the Prosecutor typically does not talk to the media.  That's a long haul from can't be used in court if it gets out to the media.

Well then they should have shut Gerald Dompig, Steve Cohen, and Julia Renfro up because they are the biggest offenders.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #522 9/10 - 9/12/2006
Post by: memphis on September 10, 2006, 08:14:29 PM
Quote from: "Tylergal"
I very much respect Shizaru and appreciate all the hard work but I do believe Natalee was set up.  It is not coincidental that we see the Casino vidoes with a dealer seemingly giving a high sign to what appears to be Paulus.  It is not coincidental that immediately Joran's plan goes into action.  >SNIP<


Hi Tyler! Did those video clips show a dealer making some kind of a sign? I musta missed that. Anyone? Do we have any stills?

Did KatzHome comment on it?


Title: Lively Case Discussion #522 9/10 - 9/12/2006
Post by: terryd270 on September 10, 2006, 08:15:28 PM
Hi everyone!  Whats the status of rumors, new Dutch Team arriving, new suspects and anything on the news about the case?


Title: Lively Case Discussion #522 9/10 - 9/12/2006
Post by: San on September 10, 2006, 08:16:44 PM
Quote from: "terryd270"
Hi everyone!  Whats the status of rumors, new Dutch Team arriving, new suspects and anything on the news about the case?

Satish's 5/31/05 Witness Statement is posted on the front page.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #522 9/10 - 9/12/2006
Post by: memphis on September 10, 2006, 08:18:25 PM
Quote from: "Anna"
.
My, those Kelpoe boys are certainly into the fabric fiber content to both comment that the pants were cotton.  Nothing but natural fibers for those guards, huh?   :roll:


 :lol:  :lol:
Definately odd details both to remember!


Title: Lively Case Discussion #522 9/10 - 9/12/2006
Post by: LilPuma on September 10, 2006, 08:20:12 PM
Quote from: "Spock"
Quote from: "Spock"
After reading The two Kalpoes "witness" statements, I can say they must have rehersed that security guard alibi story many times. Almost infinite details about the attire and description of the guard. Most people believe the "dry run" was made Monday evening when the suspects met poolside with Paulus to prepare the story. This is also the time Paulus is believed to have said "no corpse- no crime".


Deepak stated:

I can tell you the following:
- he is approximately 1.85 meters tall;
- he has a heavy set body;
- he has close-cropped hair;
- he wore a black t-shirt;
- he wore a black cotton long trousers which most of the keepers use and
- he kept walkie talkie in its hands and according to me he spoke by means of the walkie talkie.

Satish stated:

I will answer you the following:

- he is approximately 1.70 meters tall;
- he has a strong build;
- he has close-cropped black hair;
- he wore a black t-shirt;
- he wore black cotton long trousers which most of the guards wear and
- he held a walkie talkie in his hands


The statements by 2K about what the guards are wearing are too similar to not have been rehearsed.  Also, what were the guards wearing that night?  If they weren't working that night at the Allegro or anywhere else, they wouldn't have had walkie talkies.   Sounds like Jacobs knew these guys, didn't like them, and figured he had a couple of scapegoats to show the Cowboys until the family and media left the island.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #522 9/10 - 9/12/2006
Post by: terryd270 on September 10, 2006, 08:22:46 PM
Thanks I guess I will read the statements that were given..  Everyone have a good night..


Title: Lively Case Discussion #522 9/10 - 9/12/2006
Post by: terryd270 on September 10, 2006, 08:25:00 PM
Jacobs seems to be everywhere?  Is he sleeping with Julia Renfro?


Title: Lively Case Discussion #522 9/10 - 9/12/2006
Post by: San on September 10, 2006, 08:26:44 PM
Quote from: "terryd270"
Jacobs seems to be everywhere?  Is he sleeping with Julia Renfro?

No comment :lol:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #522 9/10 - 9/12/2006
Post by: Sam on September 10, 2006, 08:26:55 PM
Quote from: "klaasend"
Quote from: "Florida"
That Monday morning two surf shop employees also "disappeared"

And the daily charter "Octopus" Trimaran went out & came back...
2 weeks later.

I'm not sure about the surf shop employees.  The only person I've seen tell that story is SandraK and I don't put much creedance into her tales.


I have been saying the boat Natalee and her friends took to go scuba/ snorkeling was the Calypso. Could I be wrong? Could it have been the Octapus? Does anyone know?

I know I went to the website for it back early on but then it was gone. No longer existed. Help.....


Title: Lively Case Discussion #522 9/10 - 9/12/2006
Post by: LilPuma on September 10, 2006, 08:27:14 PM
Quote from: "terryd270"
Jacobs seems to be everywhere?  Is he sleeping with Julia Renfro?


Oh, please don't make me think about either of them naked.  :(  :x


Title: Lively Case Discussion #522 9/10 - 9/12/2006
Post by: memphis on September 10, 2006, 08:28:21 PM
Quote from: "memphis"
Quote from: "Anna"
.
My, those Kelpoe boys are certainly into the fabric fiber content to both comment that the pants were cotton.  Nothing but natural fibers for those guards, huh?   :roll:


 :lol:  :lol:
Definately odd details both to remember!


...for both to remember.  :wink:

Hi monks!


Title: Lively Case Discussion #522 9/10 - 9/12/2006
Post by: SunFreak2 on September 10, 2006, 08:30:41 PM
Hey Monkey friends!  What's up?

(http://i67.photobucket.com/albums/h291/SunFreak2/WhosThere.gif)


Title: Lively Case Discussion #522 9/10 - 9/12/2006
Post by: Carnut on September 10, 2006, 08:33:00 PM
Think it's becoming quite obvious that all the statements, interviews and tell all's have been fully scripted and rehearsed from the start and the ALE was complicit in keeping them that way.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #522 9/10 - 9/12/2006
Post by: SunFreak2 on September 10, 2006, 08:37:58 PM
I'm having trouble getting to Dana's show tonight.  Doesn't it start at 9pm?


Title: Lively Case Discussion #522 9/10 - 9/12/2006
Post by: igsigs on September 10, 2006, 08:38:18 PM
Hey Klaas, i see that BFN Debbie is saying that Joran's 5/31 statement is not available for transcription. Do you think that is correct? I am starting to think that Jacobs tore it up and threw it in the garbage.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #522 9/10 - 9/12/2006
Post by: memphis on September 10, 2006, 08:39:34 PM
Hi SunFreak!

 :D What cute friends you have.


Carnut, YEP!


Title: Lively Case Discussion #522 9/10 - 9/12/2006
Post by: klaasend on September 10, 2006, 08:45:36 PM
Quote from: "igsigs"
Hey Klaas, i see that BFN Debbie is saying that Joran's 5/31 statement is not available for transcription. Do you think that is correct? I am starting to think that Jacobs tore it up and threw it in the garbage.

I don't think it's available right now, not sure if it will be available in the future or not.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #522 9/10 - 9/12/2006
Post by: memphis on September 10, 2006, 08:53:02 PM
I must run out for about an hour.

:?   ummmm....not that anyone would notice whether I was here or not, obviously.....

I'll be back anyway, though!  :D


Title: Lively Case Discussion #522 9/10 - 9/12/2006
Post by: klaasend on September 10, 2006, 08:56:50 PM
Quote from: "memphis"
I must run out for about an hour.

:?   ummmm....not that anyone would notice whether I was here or not, obviously.....

I'll be back anyway, though!  :D


Not true!  Hurry back!


Title: Lively Case Discussion #522 9/10 - 9/12/2006
Post by: Spock on September 10, 2006, 08:58:20 PM
Quote from: "klaasend"
Quote from: "igsigs"
Hey Klaas, i see that BFN Debbie is saying that Joran's 5/31 statement is not available for transcription. Do you think that is correct? I am starting to think that Jacobs tore it up and threw it in the garbage.

I don't think it's available right now, not sure if it will be available in the future or not.


Thats one of the pre-arrest statements Art Wood said was pulled from the files. Art said none of Jorans declarations prior to about June 9 could be accounted for. I hope they turn up.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #522 9/10 - 9/12/2006
Post by: Anna on September 10, 2006, 08:58:58 PM
Quote from: "memphis"
Quote from: "Anna"
.
My, those Kelpoe boys are certainly into the fabric fiber content to both comment that the pants were cotton.  Nothing but natural fibers for those guards, huh?   :roll:


 :lol:  :lol:
Definately odd details both to remember!


Hey Memphis,
I was too busy stealing your little Sheltie icon for my dog collection.  At least I think it is a Sheltie but might be full sized collie.

That's what I do. . . . just come back anyway and talk to myself some more, lol.   :D


Title: Lively Case Discussion #522 9/10 - 9/12/2006
Post by: Anna on September 10, 2006, 09:01:07 PM
Quote from: "San"
Quote from: "terryd270"
Jacobs seems to be everywhere?  Is he sleeping with Julia Renfro?

No comment :lol:


How about Paulus and Karin Janssen?  Her behavior just makes me wonder.   :roll:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #522 9/10 - 9/12/2006
Post by: SunFreak2 on September 10, 2006, 09:02:17 PM
HELLO....

Isn't Dana doing a show tonight starting at 9pm?  Is anybody else having trouble getting it to come in?


Title: Lively Case Discussion #522 9/10 - 9/12/2006
Post by: San on September 10, 2006, 09:02:24 PM
Quote from: "Anna"
Quote from: "San"
Quote from: "terryd270"
Jacobs seems to be everywhere?  Is he sleeping with Julia Renfro?

No comment :lol:


How about Paulus and Karin Janssen?  Her behavior just makes me wonder.   :roll:

OK I'll comment.  Makes me wonder also.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #522 9/10 - 9/12/2006
Post by: klaasend on September 10, 2006, 09:03:00 PM
Quote from: "Anna"
Quote from: "San"
Quote from: "terryd270"
Jacobs seems to be everywhere?  Is he sleeping with Julia Renfro?

No comment :lol:


How about Paulus and Karin Janssen?  Her behavior just makes me wonder.   :roll:

Weren't there rumors to about that in the beginning of the case?


Title: Lively Case Discussion #522 9/10 - 9/12/2006
Post by: San on September 10, 2006, 09:04:10 PM
Quote from: "klaasend"
Quote from: "Anna"
Quote from: "San"
Quote from: "terryd270"
Jacobs seems to be everywhere?  Is he sleeping with Julia Renfro?

No comment :lol:


How about Paulus and Karin Janssen?  Her behavior just makes me wonder.   :roll:

Weren't there rumors to about that in the beginning of the case?

Well if it was a rumor it must be true.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #522 9/10 - 9/12/2006
Post by: Anna on September 10, 2006, 09:04:22 PM
Quote from: "Spock"
Quote from: "klaasend"
Quote from: "igsigs"
Hey Klaas, i see that BFN Debbie is saying that Joran's 5/31 statement is not available for transcription. Do you think that is correct? I am starting to think that Jacobs tore it up and threw it in the garbage.

I don't think it's available right now, not sure if it will be available in the future or not.


Thats one of the pre-arrest statements Art Wood said was pulled from the files. Art said none of Jorans declarations prior to about June 9 could be accounted for. I hope they turn up.


Who pulled it and where did it go?  Could the answer be Dennis Jacobs and onto his desk in itty bitty pieces?  He TOLD those boys to say Fisherman's Hut ten times!!  How long did it take Joran at least to pick up his cue?  Are the Kelpoes just too dense to take a hint or what?

Ah, but the videos still exist, don't you bet??   :roll:  :evil:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #522 9/10 - 9/12/2006
Post by: Shell on September 10, 2006, 09:04:51 PM
Quote from: "SunFreak2"
HELLO....

Isn't Dana doing a show tonight starting at 9pm?  Is anybody else having trouble getting it to come in?


Thanks for sharing that adorable monkey pic...too cute!


Title: Lively Case Discussion #522 9/10 - 9/12/2006
Post by: Carnut on September 10, 2006, 09:05:08 PM
Quote from: "klaasend"
Quote from: "Anna"
Quote from: "San"
Quote from: "terryd270"
Jacobs seems to be everywhere?  Is he sleeping with Julia Renfro?

No comment :lol:


How about Paulus and Karin Janssen?  Her behavior just makes me wonder.   :roll:

Weren't there rumors to about that in the beginning of the case?


Yes, some rumors speculated that activity to be one of the causes of PVDS returning early from Holland without AVDS.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #522 9/10 - 9/12/2006
Post by: SunFreak2 on September 10, 2006, 09:09:36 PM
Will someone please answer me about Dana's show?

Thank you?


Title: Lively Case Discussion #522 9/10 - 9/12/2006
Post by: Anna on September 10, 2006, 09:09:50 PM
.
Why didn't you search the entire van der Sloot property?

Paulus wouldn't let us!  Paulus wouldn't let us!!   :?

We couldn't go in like cowboys!!   :roll:

.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #522 9/10 - 9/12/2006
Post by: Carnut on September 10, 2006, 09:12:25 PM
Quote from: "SunFreak2"
Will someone please answer me about Dana's show?

Thank you?


Sorry I don't know.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #522 9/10 - 9/12/2006
Post by: LouiseVargas on September 10, 2006, 09:13:10 PM
Hi everyone, I haven't been here for ages.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #522 9/10 - 9/12/2006
Post by: Lala'sMom on September 10, 2006, 09:13:40 PM
Good Evening Monkeys!  As always, interesting conversation going on right now.  

Anna used my favorite word to describe this entire mess...nefarious.  I just love that word.  :wink:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #522 9/10 - 9/12/2006
Post by: Lala'sMom on September 10, 2006, 09:14:38 PM
Quote from: "LouiseVargas"
Hi everyone, I haven't been here for ages.


Hi there, Louise.  Good to see you.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #522 9/10 - 9/12/2006
Post by: LouiseVargas on September 10, 2006, 09:17:36 PM
Hi LaLas, Carnut and Sunfreak


Title: Lively Case Discussion #522 9/10 - 9/12/2006
Post by: oldfart on September 10, 2006, 09:17:46 PM
Hi Monkeys...
I was going to try & listen to Dana Tongiht... Have had problems   but just got it to work

http://st106.startlogic.com/~cbandtal/net.html

Just so ya know....

SeeYa


Title: Lively Case Discussion #522 9/10 - 9/12/2006
Post by: LouiseVargas on September 10, 2006, 09:19:21 PM
Anna, Shell and San, OldFart


Title: Lively Case Discussion #522 9/10 - 9/12/2006
Post by: San on September 10, 2006, 09:22:30 PM
Quote from: "Anna"
Quote from: "Spock"
Quote from: "klaasend"
Quote from: "igsigs"
Hey Klaas, i see that BFN Debbie is saying that Joran's 5/31 statement is not available for transcription. Do you think that is correct? I am starting to think that Jacobs tore it up and threw it in the garbage.

I don't think it's available right now, not sure if it will be available in the future or not.


Thats one of the pre-arrest statements Art Wood said was pulled from the files. Art said none of Jorans declarations prior to about June 9 could be accounted for. I hope they turn up.


Who pulled it and where did it go?  Could the answer be Dennis Jacobs and onto his desk in itty bitty pieces?  He TOLD those boys to say Fisherman's Hut ten times!!  How long did it take Joran at least to pick up his cue?  Are the Kelpoes just too dense to take a hint or what?

Ah, but the videos still exist, don't you bet??   :roll:  :evil:

This is what I am wondering Anna.  What happens if they don't produce the videos?


Title: Lively Case Discussion #522 9/10 - 9/12/2006
Post by: LouiseVargas on September 10, 2006, 09:22:38 PM
Klaas, may I ask? Is there any hope of finding justice for Natalee or are we just going over the new "facts" as they come out and trying to analyze them?


Title: Lively Case Discussion #522 9/10 - 9/12/2006
Post by: BTgirl on September 10, 2006, 09:23:04 PM
Hi to Louise and Lalas.

Haven't seen you guys for a while.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #522 9/10 - 9/12/2006
Post by: LouiseVargas on September 10, 2006, 09:24:47 PM
BT!  Kisses.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #522 9/10 - 9/12/2006
Post by: Lala'sMom on September 10, 2006, 09:25:17 PM
Hi BT, have you been a good little girl lately?


Title: Lively Case Discussion #522 9/10 - 9/12/2006
Post by: San on September 10, 2006, 09:28:17 PM
Quote from: "LouiseVargas"
Anna, Shell and San, OldFart

Hi Louise how are you.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #522 9/10 - 9/12/2006
Post by: Carnut on September 10, 2006, 09:29:20 PM
Quote from: "BTgirl"
Hi to Louise and Lalas.

Haven't seen you guys for a while.


You just haven't been frequenting the rest of the forums on the site.

I've been butting heads with Louise almost continuously.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #522 9/10 - 9/12/2006
Post by: SunFreak2 on September 10, 2006, 09:29:21 PM
Quote from: "oldfart"
Hi Monkeys...
I was going to try & listen to Dana Tongiht... Have had problems   but just got it to work

http://st106.startlogic.com/~cbandtal/net.html

Just so ya know....

SeeYa


Thanks OldFart.  It's working for me now too.

Thanks CarNut, for answering me.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #522 9/10 - 9/12/2006
Post by: SunFreak2 on September 10, 2006, 09:30:56 PM
Hi Mama Louise!  How are you?!!!


Title: Lively Case Discussion #522 9/10 - 9/12/2006
Post by: oldfart on September 10, 2006, 09:32:15 PM
Quote from: "LouiseVargas"
Klaas, may I ask? Is there any hope of finding justice for Natalee or are we just going over the new "facts" as they come out and trying to analyze them?


HI Louise and who ever is hanging around

Louise
I can not speak for any other Monkey   but there always is HOPE for JUSTICE.  New facts or new lies ?? coming out are being discussed.

Read my sig. line..  
It may take longer than we want  but Justice does have a way of handed out...  JMO

Out the door for FOOD...
SeeeYaByeeeeee all


Title: Lively Case Discussion #522 9/10 - 9/12/2006
Post by: mrs. red on September 10, 2006, 09:34:14 PM
There is hope for justice... I totally believe that.

Is anyone else watching the 911 movie on ABC?


Title: Lively Case Discussion #522 9/10 - 9/12/2006
Post by: Carnut on September 10, 2006, 09:35:53 PM
Quote from: "mrs. red"
There is hope for justice... I totally believe that.

Is anyone else watching the 911 movie on ABC?


Not me, I think I kinda kept up with most of what really happened thru those years.

Hope that's not too much ego on my part to think so.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #522 9/10 - 9/12/2006
Post by: LouiseVargas on September 10, 2006, 09:36:07 PM
Hi SunFreak, how's my girl?

I've been hanging out on the "lower" threads. You must read my post with pics in the Black Dahlia thread.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #522 9/10 - 9/12/2006
Post by: mrs. red on September 10, 2006, 09:36:40 PM
Quote from: "memphis"
I must run out for about an hour.

:?   ummmm....not that anyone would notice whether I was here or not, obviously.....

I'll be back anyway, though!  :D


Honey hush, I always notice you!!!  I just run in and out a lot and sometimes have to read what is being said instead of talking myself....


Title: Lively Case Discussion #522 9/10 - 9/12/2006
Post by: San on September 10, 2006, 09:37:36 PM
Quote from: "mrs. red"
There is hope for justice... I totally believe that.

Is anyone else watching the 911 movie on ABC?

No


Title: Lively Case Discussion #522 9/10 - 9/12/2006
Post by: Carnut on September 10, 2006, 09:37:40 PM
Quote from: "LouiseVargas"
Hi SunFreak, how's my girl?

I've been hanging out on the "lower" threads. You must read my post with pics in the Black Dahlia thread.


Yeah, that Dahlia adventure is definitely a must read.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #522 9/10 - 9/12/2006
Post by: mrs. red on September 10, 2006, 09:38:10 PM
Quote from: "SunFreak2"
Will someone please answer me about Dana's show?

Thank you?

Sun yes he is ... and I am coming in too late for an answer, I am sorry :oops:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #522 9/10 - 9/12/2006
Post by: LouiseVargas on September 10, 2006, 09:38:10 PM
Carnut is twisting the truth. We have not been butting heads, we have just been commenting. Carnut makes me smile.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #522 9/10 - 9/12/2006
Post by: LouiseVargas on September 10, 2006, 09:41:01 PM
Mrs. Red, yes I plan to watch the ABC movie. I hope I can stay awake for the whole thing. I've been known to fall asleep sitting up on my sofa with my dinner plate in my lap, and then wake up at 3 a.m. only to find my meal scattered, eaten and played with by the cats.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #522 9/10 - 9/12/2006
Post by: mrs. red on September 10, 2006, 09:41:30 PM
Quote from: "San"
Quote from: "mrs. red"
There is hope for justice... I totally believe that.

Is anyone else watching the 911 movie on ABC?

No


San, it's really good.  It is not "too" doctored but it will make anyone angry about all the lost chances to nip this terrorism in the bud when we could have... the waffling and stupidity... grrr...


and yes, y'all have to check out LV's photos...


Title: Lively Case Discussion #522 9/10 - 9/12/2006
Post by: mrs. red on September 10, 2006, 09:42:33 PM
Quote from: "LouiseVargas"
Mrs. Red, yes I plan to watch the ABC movie. I hope I can stay awake for the whole thing. I've been known to fall asleep sitting up on my sofa with my dinner plate in my lap, and then wake up at 3 a.m. only to find my meal scattered, eaten and played with by the cats.


LV, I am glad to hear that you plan to watch it... I can't wait to discuss it with you in our thread....


Title: Lively Case Discussion #522 9/10 - 9/12/2006
Post by: LouiseVargas on September 10, 2006, 09:44:30 PM
It's a deal, Mrs. Red.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #522 9/10 - 9/12/2006
Post by: nonesuche on September 10, 2006, 09:50:04 PM
Quote from: "SunFreak2"
HELLO....

Isn't Dana doing a show tonight starting at 9pm?  Is anybody else having trouble getting it to come in?


waving at SunFreak - I wish I knew - I can't get the link to work either?

Maybe we have the wrong night?


Title: Lively Case Discussion #522 9/10 - 9/12/2006
Post by: mrs. red on September 10, 2006, 09:50:40 PM
Quote from: "LouiseVargas"
It's a deal, Mrs. Red.


K... sorry for the o/t y'all I am going to go and finish watching the movie... I just wanted to pop in and say that it is worth watching... I don't care which side of the political fence you may be on... it's just so informative.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #522 9/10 - 9/12/2006
Post by: mrs. red on September 10, 2006, 09:51:24 PM
Quote from: "nonesuche"
Quote from: "SunFreak2"
HELLO....

Isn't Dana doing a show tonight starting at 9pm?  Is anybody else having trouble getting it to come in?


waving at SunFreak - I wish I knew - I can't get the link to work either?

Maybe we have the wrong night?

Dana was going to have a show tonight.... I had planned on listening to the podcast later...


Title: Lively Case Discussion #522 9/10 - 9/12/2006
Post by: nonesuche on September 10, 2006, 09:52:28 PM
ok thanks Mrs Red, it looks like I skipped over some posts answering the question anyway  :oops:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #522 9/10 - 9/12/2006
Post by: mrs. red on September 10, 2006, 09:54:32 PM
Quote from: "nonesuche"
ok thanks Mrs Red, it looks like I skipped over some posts answering the question anyway  :oops:

I have to stay in and talk to y'all ... this movie is just so hard to watch...


Title: Lively Case Discussion #522 9/10 - 9/12/2006
Post by: Carnut on September 10, 2006, 09:58:32 PM
Quote from: "mrs. red"
Quote from: "nonesuche"
ok thanks Mrs Red, it looks like I skipped over some posts answering the question anyway  :oops:

I have to stay in and talk to y'all ... this movie is just so hard to watch...


That period of time was part of what caused so much political polarization in the country. Just observing those events in real time was what put so many conservatives so vehemently against the 'clintons'.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #522 9/10 - 9/12/2006
Post by: Spock on September 10, 2006, 09:59:42 PM
I am confused, are Joran's pre-arrest statements in the translation pipeline, or are they missing from the files as Art Wood said??


Title: Lively Case Discussion #522 9/10 - 9/12/2006
Post by: Carnut on September 10, 2006, 10:01:18 PM
Quote from: "Spock"
I am confused, are Joran's pre-arrest statements in the translation pipeline, or are they missing from the files as Art Wood said??


I think the consensus is that there are no pre-arrest statements from JVDS.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #522 9/10 - 9/12/2006
Post by: LouiseVargas on September 10, 2006, 10:04:52 PM
I'll be back. Have to go cook.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #522 9/10 - 9/12/2006
Post by: klaasend on September 10, 2006, 10:06:11 PM
Quote from: "Spock"
I am confused, are Joran's pre-arrest statements in the translation pipeline, or are they missing from the files as Art Wood said??

I'm not sure.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #522 9/10 - 9/12/2006
Post by: Spock on September 10, 2006, 10:13:06 PM
Quote from: "klaasend"
Quote from: "Spock"
I am confused, are Joran's pre-arrest statements in the translation pipeline, or are they missing from the files as Art Wood said??

I'm not sure.

I'm feeling quite frustrated, I can only imagine how the family must feel.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #522 9/10 - 9/12/2006
Post by: Sam on September 10, 2006, 10:17:12 PM
I guess I am on ignore. I have asked the same sort of question for the last few days. It turns out I was wrong on the name of the boat. It was not Calypso. It was Octopus.

This supposedly was the one that Natalee and her friends went snorkeling/ scuba on. Klaas is going to shoot me because I do not know how to do the tiny urls. I think this one should be small enough to not blow the margins. This is the boat Florida mentioned leaving Aruba the day after Natalee disappeared. Monday am. It was said it was a planned vacation.

When I saw this website before I thought it had a picture of Captain Jethro where you could see his eyes and they were blue. This picture he has on sunglasses.

According to this site there are no Sunday cruises listed. From my memory it was supposed to have been a cruise they were on before going to the Excelsior.

Just idle speculation on my part but I have often wondered if the cab drivers story was true and Nat said she was in love with a blue eyed Dutch boy if she could have been kidding about Jethro. Much to old for her but cute. Ok heres the site.

http://www.octopusaruba.com/index.html


Title: Lively Case Discussion #522 9/10 - 9/12/2006
Post by: Lala'sMom on September 10, 2006, 10:21:17 PM
Hi there Sam...I see you...the hall monitor sees all. :wink:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #522 9/10 - 9/12/2006
Post by: San on September 10, 2006, 10:24:08 PM
Quote from: "Sam"
I guess I am on ignore. I have asked the same sort of question for the last few days. It turns out I was wrong on the name of the boat. It was not Calypso. It was Octopus.

This supposedly was the one that Natalee and her friends went snorkeling/ scuba on. Klaas is going to shoot me because I do not know how to do the tiny urls. I think this one should be small enough to not blow the margins. This is the boat Florida mentioned leaving Aruba the day after Natalee disappeared. Monday am. It was said it was a planned vacation.

When I saw this website before I thought it had a picture of Captain Jethro where you could see his eyes and they were blue. This picture he has on sunglasses.

According to this site there are no Sunday cruises listed. From my memory it was supposed to have been a cruise they were on before going to the Excelsior.

Just idle speculation on my part but I have often wondered if the cab drivers story was true and Nat said she was in love with a blue eyed Dutch boy if she could have been kidding about Jethro. Much to old for her but cute. Ok heres the site.

http://www.octopusaruba.com/index.html


Hi Sam you are not on ignore.

Captain Jethro looks like a crackhead.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #522 9/10 - 9/12/2006
Post by: Sam on September 10, 2006, 10:27:08 PM
Quote from: "Lala'sMom"
Hi there Sam...I see you...the hall monitor sees all. :wink:


Thank you Lala'sMom. By the way I had a brief email from Darleen this morning. I think she may be home now. Hope she comes in to see us before long. Oh she will be upset when she has to learn to do her avatar and Tiara again. I still have not figured it out. LOL


Title: Lively Case Discussion #522 9/10 - 9/12/2006
Post by: igsigs on September 10, 2006, 10:29:42 PM
Quote from: "Carnut"
Quote from: "Spock"
I am confused, are Joran's pre-arrest statements in the translation pipeline, or are they missing from the files as Art Wood said??


I think the consensus is that there are no pre-arrest statements from JVDS.

When the SGs were in jail their attorney Chris Lejuez was given access to the Kalpoes statements, but not Joran's. So this issue goes way back.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #522 9/10 - 9/12/2006
Post by: Sam on September 10, 2006, 10:31:05 PM
San , I am not sure what a crackhead looks like. LOL

I thought he was kinda cute. Had a friendly looking smile. JMHO


Title: Lively Case Discussion #522 9/10 - 9/12/2006
Post by: SunFreak2 on September 10, 2006, 10:33:05 PM
Quote from: "LouiseVargas"
Hi SunFreak, how's my girl?

I've been hanging out on the "lower" threads. You must read my post with pics in the Black Dahlia thread.


Sorry about the delay in getting back to you.  

I'll go read your post - it sounds like it'll be interesting.   :D


Title: Lively Case Discussion #522 9/10 - 9/12/2006
Post by: Lala'sMom on September 10, 2006, 10:35:02 PM
Quote from: "Sam"
Quote from: "Lala'sMom"
Hi there Sam...I see you...the hall monitor sees all. :wink:


Thank you Lala'sMom. By the way I had a brief email from Darleen this morning. I think she may be home now. Hope she comes in to see us before long. Oh she will be upset when she has to learn to do her avatar and Tiara again. I still have not figured it out. LOL


The Tiara Queen is back? :shock:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #522 9/10 - 9/12/2006
Post by: BTgirl on September 10, 2006, 10:35:48 PM
Sorry if I ignored some people who spoke to me a while back.  :oops:

I left to go address a book to my friend Lalas. :D


Title: Lively Case Discussion #522 9/10 - 9/12/2006
Post by: Lala'sMom on September 10, 2006, 10:36:15 PM
Sunfreak
Thanks for remembering Nemo last night.  It was sweet of you.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #522 9/10 - 9/12/2006
Post by: klaasend on September 10, 2006, 10:38:21 PM
Quote from: "Sam"
I guess I am on ignore. I have asked the same sort of question for the last few days. It turns out I was wrong on the name of the boat. It was not Calypso. It was Octopus.

This supposedly was the one that Natalee and her friends went snorkeling/ scuba on. Klaas is going to shoot me because I do not know how to do the tiny urls. I think this one should be small enough to not blow the margins. This is the boat Florida mentioned leaving Aruba the day after Natalee disappeared. Monday am. It was said it was a planned vacation.

When I saw this website before I thought it had a picture of Captain Jethro where you could see his eyes and they were blue. This picture he has on sunglasses.

According to this site there are no Sunday cruises listed. From my memory it was supposed to have been a cruise they were on before going to the Excelsior.

Just idle speculation on my part but I have often wondered if the cab drivers story was true and Nat said she was in love with a blue eyed Dutch boy if she could have been kidding about Jethro. Much to old for her but cute. Ok heres the site.

http://www.octopusaruba.com/index.html

Not ignoring you I just don't believe the story. So what happened?  Natalee ran away with Jethro?  Jethro found Natalee on the beach and killed her?  Jethro found Natalee on the beach and sold her as a sex slave?  Seems very unlikely.  Why would Natalee be targeted in such a way?


Title: Lively Case Discussion #522 9/10 - 9/12/2006
Post by: Lala'sMom on September 10, 2006, 10:44:20 PM
Quote from: "BTgirl"
Sorry if I ignored some people who spoke to me a while back.  :oops:

I left to go address a book to my friend Lalas. :D


How sweet.  :wink:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #522 9/10 - 9/12/2006
Post by: Sam on September 10, 2006, 10:45:48 PM
Quote from: "klaasend"
Quote from: "Sam"
I guess I am on ignore. I have asked the same sort of question for the last few days. It turns out I was wrong on the name of the boat. It was not Calypso. It was Octopus.

This supposedly was the one that Natalee and her friends went snorkeling/ scuba on. Klaas is going to shoot me because I do not know how to do the tiny urls. I think this one should be small enough to not blow the margins. This is the boat Florida mentioned leaving Aruba the day after Natalee disappeared. Monday am. It was said it was a planned vacation.

When I saw this website before I thought it had a picture of Captain Jethro where you could see his eyes and they were blue. This picture he has on sunglasses.

According to this site there are no Sunday cruises listed. From my memory it was supposed to have been a cruise they were on before going to the Excelsior.

Just idle speculation on my part but I have often wondered if the cab drivers story was true and Nat said she was in love with a blue eyed Dutch boy if she could have been kidding about Jethro. Much to old for her but cute. Ok heres the site.

http://www.octopusaruba.com/index.html

Not ignoring you I just don't believe the story. So what happened?  Natalee ran away with Jethro?  Jethro found Natalee on the beach and killed her?  Jethro found Natalee on the beach and sold her as a sex slave?  Seems very unlikely.  Why would Natalee be targeted in such a way?



Klaas ,

 again just speculation, but what do we really know about Jethro Gesterkamp other than he does these cruises? Does he know the vander Sloots? Since he was leaving on this planned vacation cruise anyway. The radar that doesn't work would have paid no attention to him leaving. He could be a good source for a body disposal.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #522 9/10 - 9/12/2006
Post by: BTgirl on September 10, 2006, 10:47:17 PM
Quote from: "Lala'sMom"
Quote from: "BTgirl"
Sorry if I ignored some people who spoke to me a while back.  :oops:

I left to go address a book to my friend Lalas. :D


How sweet.  :wink:


Well, ya know, I AM the sweet one.  :P  8)


Title: Lively Case Discussion #522 9/10 - 9/12/2006
Post by: SunFreak2 on September 10, 2006, 10:48:07 PM
Quote from: "Sam"
I guess I am on ignore. I have asked the same sort of question for the last few days. It turns out I was wrong on the name of the boat. It was not Calypso. It was Octopus.

This supposedly was the one that Natalee and her friends went snorkeling/ scuba on. Klaas is going to shoot me because I do not know how to do the tiny urls. I think this one should be small enough to not blow the margins. This is the boat Florida mentioned leaving Aruba the day after Natalee disappeared. Monday am. It was said it was a planned vacation.

When I saw this website before I thought it had a picture of Captain Jethro where you could see his eyes and they were blue. This picture he has on sunglasses.

According to this site there are no Sunday cruises listed. From my memory it was supposed to have been a cruise they were on before going to the Excelsior.

Just idle speculation on my part but I have often wondered if the cab drivers story was true and Nat said she was in love with a blue eyed Dutch boy if she could have been kidding about Jethro. Much to old for her but cute. Ok heres the site.

http://www.octopusaruba.com/index.html


Interesting.  If he's been doing this gig for 25 years, that would make him somewhere in his 40's.  He's a far sight better that Paulus, but still old enough to be Natalee's father.  Somehow, I don't see an 18 yo girl like Natalee, interested in a man that age.  

If that taxi story is true, perhaps it was during the ride back from CnC's that Friday nite after the alleged groping by GVC.  Maybe it was all facetious remarks, and the cabbie didn't quite understand it all.

I'm sure there were many boats leaving Aruba that weekend.  It was an American holiday weekend and also the Soul Beach music festival.

I'm sold on J2K & P's culpability in this tragedy.  Too many lies and too much cover-up for it to be anyone else, as far as I am concerened.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #522 9/10 - 9/12/2006
Post by: sb on September 10, 2006, 10:50:58 PM
I see that over the last couple of days we have been given a few tidbits to chew on for a while... the Satish statement (he actually SPEAKS! Wonder of wonders!) the posts by Florida, the whereabouts of Joran's pre-detention statements, etc.

Some of this stuff has NEVER come out before- that Joran's first statements may have been destroyed, and that people went missing he following day.

I am just hoping that "details" which could turn the case even now, have not fallen victim to time and /or a shredder or bonfire.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #522 9/10 - 9/12/2006
Post by: Sam on September 10, 2006, 10:51:33 PM
OOPs! the radar was for the planes. But i do remember Dompig saying they knew all the boats that left the harbors.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #522 9/10 - 9/12/2006
Post by: sb on September 10, 2006, 10:55:08 PM
Also, this is the first time I have heard that JVDS and Deepak were at CC's the night before and offered a MB guy a ride back to the hotel.

DRY RUN

SMOKESCREEN

BUILD TRUST

That is more than "Hey, let's pick up some girls tonight". (JVDS said that was the object of the "spontaneous" run to CC's on Sun. evening)


Title: Lively Case Discussion #522 9/10 - 9/12/2006
Post by: Carnut on September 10, 2006, 10:55:45 PM
Ooooooh, aruba was just mentioned on the 1970 movie 'Lovers and Other Strangers'.

Someone went on their honeymoon to aruba back then.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #522 9/10 - 9/12/2006
Post by: Lala'sMom on September 10, 2006, 10:55:45 PM
Quote from: "sb"
I see that over the last couple of days we have been given a few tidbits to chew on for a while... the Satish statement (he actually SPEAKS! Wonder of wonders!) the posts by Florida, the whereabouts of Joran's pre-detention statements, etc.

Some of this stuff has NEVER come out before- that Joran's first statements may have been destroyed, and that people went missing he following day.

I am just hoping that "details" which could turn the case even now, have not fallen victim to time and /or a shredder or bonfire.


I vote for the bonfire.  :roll:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #522 9/10 - 9/12/2006
Post by: klaasend on September 10, 2006, 10:55:56 PM
Appearing in the Trade Register of the Chamber of Commerce and Industry in ARUBA since 8 NOVEMBER 1994 under serial number 17922.0 is the company with the trade name:
 
 
OCTOPUS
 
Business address BORANCANA 12, NOORD  
Legal form  SOLE OWNERSHIP  
Name of the company  OCTOPUS  
Date of commencement  16 AUGUST 1994  
     
   
OWNERS/PARTNERS  
 
GESTERKAMP, TOM ADRIAAN;  
Residing in  BORANCANA 12, NOORD, ARUBA  
Born in  THE NETHERLANDS, DEN HAAG on 23 SEPTEMBER 1957  
Nationality  DUTCH  
Position  OWNER  
Effective  8 NOVEMBER 1994  
Authority  FULL  
   
OBJECTIVE(S) OF THE COMPANY  
 
TO OPERATE A WATERSPORT COMPANY


Title: Lively Case Discussion #522 9/10 - 9/12/2006
Post by: Lala'sMom on September 10, 2006, 10:57:04 PM
Quote from: "sb"
Also, this is the first time I have heard that JVDS and Deepak were at CC's the night before and offered a MB guy a ride back to the hotel.

DRY RUN

SMOKESCREEN

BUILD TRUST

That is more than "Hey, let's pick up some girls tonight". (JVDS said that was the object of the "spontaneous" run to CC's on Sun. evening)


It's really hard to formulate a good lie when you have done this 20 times before.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #522 9/10 - 9/12/2006
Post by: igsigs on September 10, 2006, 10:57:41 PM
CHRIS LEJUEZ, ATTORNEY FOR ABRAHAM JONES: Nancy, i have seen only the statements of two of the three men. The evidence that i got, the documentation, the files that i recieved from the prosecuter's office contained only two of the statements.

My colleague has asked the prosecuter why only the two, not the one of the Dutch boy? She was told by the prosecuter, at least by the prosecuter's office, that the statement would not be relevant to the case of her suspect, her client.

http://transcripts.cnn.com/TRANSCRIPTS/0506/09/ng.01.html

 :arrow: Was Joran's 5/31 statement "not relevant" to the case against the SGs because...he did not include them in his statement? Did Joran abandon the HI lie on 5/31?


Title: Lively Case Discussion #522 9/10 - 9/12/2006
Post by: Sam on September 10, 2006, 10:59:11 PM
Sunfreak,
I hope you read my reply to Klaas. No I do not seriously think Natalee would have truly been interested in a man over twice her age but it has happened.

I am just thinking if he had been doing these cruises for that long of a period of time he would have got to know a lot of the locals. Again a good source for a body disposal. I also think the real culprit is Joran. I am still not sure on the Kalpoes. It is possible though.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #522 9/10 - 9/12/2006
Post by: sb on September 10, 2006, 10:59:31 PM
Anyone else pondering why Joran's pre-arrest statements would be destroyed, while Deepak and Satish would be left intact. They probably had the same info, since all came from the same place (Paulus' imagination and deviant brain) Why deep-six Joran's ONLY?


Title: Lively Case Discussion #522 9/10 - 9/12/2006
Post by: igsigs on September 10, 2006, 11:05:19 PM
Quote from: "sb"
Anyone else pondering why Joran's pre-arrest statements would be destroyed, while Deepak and Satish would be left intact. They probably had the same info, since all came from the same place (Paulus' imagination and deviant brain) Why deep-six Joran's ONLY?

Destroyed because they were  :arrow:  not the same. The prosecuter's office stated that Joran did not implicate the SGs, IMO.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #522 9/10 - 9/12/2006
Post by: Lala'sMom on September 10, 2006, 11:06:41 PM
Quote from: "sb"
Anyone else pondering why Joran's pre-arrest statements would be destroyed, while Deepak and Satish would be left intact. They probably had the same info, since all came from the same place (Paulus' imagination and deviant brain) Why deep-six Joran's ONLY?


Well, from reading those statements you can clearly see a contrived story in the making. Maybe Joran  decided to blame the K2 and something went wrong.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #522 9/10 - 9/12/2006
Post by: SunFreak2 on September 10, 2006, 11:08:00 PM
Quote from: "sb"
Anyone else pondering why Joran's pre-arrest statements would be destroyed, while Deepak and Satish would be left intact. They probably had the same info, since all came from the same place (Paulus' imagination and deviant brain) Why deep-six Joran's ONLY?


Why?  Because Joran is GUILTY.  The Kalpoe's are peripheral, and there's were probably saved to pin the whole thing on them.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #522 9/10 - 9/12/2006
Post by: Sam on September 10, 2006, 11:09:52 PM
The truth , the whole truth and nothing but the truth.

I suspect everyone.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #522 9/10 - 9/12/2006
Post by: Spock on September 10, 2006, 11:12:18 PM
Quote from: "igsigs"
CHRIS LEJUEZ, ATTORNEY FOR ABRAHAM JONES: Nancy, i have seen only the statements of two of the three men. The evidence that i got, the documentation, the files that i recieved from the prosecuter's office contained only two of the statements.

My colleague has asked the prosecuter why only the two, not the one of the Dutch boy? She was told by the prosecuter, at least by the prosecuter's office, that the statement would not be relevant to the case of her suspect, her client.

http://transcripts.cnn.com/TRANSCRIPTS/0506/09/ng.01.html

 :arrow: Was Joran's 5/31 statement "not relevant" to the case against the SGs because...he did not include them in his statement? Did Joran abandon the HI lie on 5/31?


More insight on the missing 5/31 statement, thank you


Title: Lively Case Discussion #522 9/10 - 9/12/2006
Post by: Sam on September 10, 2006, 11:13:45 PM
Klaas, thank you for doing the research on Gesterkamp. So since 1994 on his ownership.

Also noticed he was born in 1957. That is the year I was married so 49 years.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #522 9/10 - 9/12/2006
Post by: sb on September 10, 2006, 11:14:57 PM
Quote from: "igsigs"
CHRIS LEJUEZ, ATTORNEY FOR ABRAHAM JONES: Nancy, i have seen only the statements of two of the three men. The evidence that I got, the documentation, the files that I recieved from the prosecutor's office contained only two of the statements.

My colleague has asked the prosecutor why only the two, not the one of the Dutch boy? She was told by the prosecuter, at least by the prosecuter's office, that the statement would not be relevant to the case of her suspect, her client.

 :arrow: Was Joran's 5/31 statement "not relevant" to the case against the SGs because...he did not include them in his statement? Did Joran abandon the HI lie on 5/31?


To me, this could be a hint that the Kalpoes saw a different ending sequence, or an earlier one, than Joran did. Maybe Joran saw "other people" AND KNEW THEIR SIGNIFICANCE and deliberately left them out of his version (to diminish their importance), whereas the Kalpoes never actually saw 2 men, but were told to mention the 2 men in a certain way, to "cover" for anyone having seen Natalee being led off by 2 men immediately after being handed over by Joran.

The fabrication out of THIN AIR of 2 Security Guards has always seemed suspect to me and has NEVER made sense. Alibis and excuses almost ALWAYS begin with a kernel of truth that gets embellished and redone in the telling.

Did Joran transact an encounter with 2 men and deliberately not mention them, while telling the Kalpoes to describe them the way he wanted, to fit the cover story he and Paulus contrived?


Title: Lively Case Discussion #522 9/10 - 9/12/2006
Post by: Lala'sMom on September 10, 2006, 11:16:53 PM
Spock
The ALE knew or at the least suspected that the SG story was a lie early on.  I would bet almost before KJ charged in like cowboys and took them away.  It was just show on their part.  They were stalling for time to help the Sloots and the K2 got in the way.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #522 9/10 - 9/12/2006
Post by: SunFreak2 on September 10, 2006, 11:19:47 PM
Quote from: "Sam"
Klaas, thank you for doing the research on Gesterkamp. So since 1994 on his ownership.

Also noticed he was born in 1957. That is the year I was married so 49 years.


OK, I'm somewhat confused.  I thought she met GVC when snorkeling or was that watersking?  If she hadn't met GVC prior to Friday nite, what would possess him to target Natalee to grope?


Title: Lively Case Discussion #522 9/10 - 9/12/2006
Post by: Lala'sMom on September 10, 2006, 11:20:25 PM
Quote from: "SunFreak2"
Quote from: "Sam"
Klaas, thank you for doing the research on Gesterkamp. So since 1994 on his ownership.

Also noticed he was born in 1957. That is the year I was married so 49 years.


OK, I'm somewhat confused.  I thought she met GVC when snorkeling or was that watersking?  If she hadn't met GVC prior to Friday nite, what would possess him to target Natalee to grope?


Good question.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #522 9/10 - 9/12/2006
Post by: San on September 10, 2006, 11:21:23 PM
Quote from: "SunFreak2"
Quote from: "Sam"
Klaas, thank you for doing the research on Gesterkamp. So since 1994 on his ownership.

Also noticed he was born in 1957. That is the year I was married so 49 years.


OK, I'm somewhat confused.  I thought she met GVC when snorkeling or was that watersking?  If she hadn't met GVC prior to Friday nite, what would possess him to target Natalee to grope?

Maybe someone was watching him to see how she reacts.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #522 9/10 - 9/12/2006
Post by: klaasend on September 10, 2006, 11:21:50 PM
Quote from: "SunFreak2"
Quote from: "Sam"
Klaas, thank you for doing the research on Gesterkamp. So since 1994 on his ownership.

Also noticed he was born in 1957. That is the year I was married so 49 years.


OK, I'm somewhat confused.  I thought she met GVC when snorkeling or was that watersking?  If she hadn't met GVC prior to Friday nite, what would possess him to target Natalee to grope?

GVC works for Pelican Water Sports.  You see photos of him near the inner tubes and the parasailing.  I don't think he has anything to do with the Octopus which takes you on some of the snorkleing trips.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #522 9/10 - 9/12/2006
Post by: SunFreak2 on September 10, 2006, 11:21:59 PM
I wish we knew who it was with her at the Wyndham argueing with her over buying a piece of jewelry.  Has anyone ever confirmed that story and the video or is that just an internet rumor from RU?


Title: Lively Case Discussion #522 9/10 - 9/12/2006
Post by: sb on September 10, 2006, 11:22:32 PM
Quote from: "igsigs"
The prosecutor's office stated that Joran did not implicate the SGs, IMO.


That would have MAJOR implications.

Joran deliberately strayed away from the script given to the Kalpoes.

I believe he did so partly out of fear. Of the guys who would be angry at his having mentioned them. The Kalpoes, unknowingly, were set up to mention the 2 guys and become canaries (and we know what the bad guys do those who sing).

In other words, Paulus instructed the Kalpoes in the cover story in order  to have them make targets out of themselves for retribution.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #522 9/10 - 9/12/2006
Post by: klaasend on September 10, 2006, 11:22:43 PM
Quote from: "SunFreak2"
I wish we knew who it was with her at the Wyndham argueing with her over buying a piece of jewelry.  Has anyone ever confirmed that story and the video or is that just an internet rumor from RU?

Unconfirmed


Title: Lively Case Discussion #522 9/10 - 9/12/2006
Post by: Spock on September 10, 2006, 11:24:33 PM
Quote from: "Lala'sMom"
Spock
The ALE knew or at the least suspected that the SG story was a lie early on.  I would bet almost before KJ charged in like cowboys and took them away.  It was just show on their part.  They were stalling for time to help the Sloots and the K2 got in the way.


I recall Beth said she was in a police meeting on about June 1-2 when it was acknowledged the SG story was a lie. Art Wood said (on Dana's show)it was clear to everyone in law enforcement that the SGs were innocent at the time of their arrest a few days later.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #522 9/10 - 9/12/2006
Post by: igsigs on September 10, 2006, 11:26:18 PM
Quote from: "Spock"
Quote from: "igsigs"
CHRIS LEJUEZ, ATTORNEY FOR ABRAHAM JONES: Nancy, i have seen only the statements of two of the three men. The evidence that i got, the documentation, the files that i recieved from the prosecuter's office contained only two of the statements.

My colleague has asked the prosecuter why only the two, not the one of the Dutch boy? She was told by the prosecuter, at least by the prosecuter's office, that the statement would not be relevant to the case of her suspect, her client.

http://transcripts.cnn.com/TRANSCRIPTS/0506/09/ng.01.html

 :arrow: Was Joran's 5/31 statement "not relevant" to the case against the SGs because...he did not include them in his statement? Did Joran abandon the HI lie on 5/31?


More insight on the missing 5/31 statement, thank you


You're welcome SPOCK. Seeing this Lejuez interview was shocking to me. The prosecuter is saying that Joran does not implicate the SGs on 5/31. That much is clear to me. It's starting to look like Jacobs is trying to get them all on the same page. And Janssen.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #522 9/10 - 9/12/2006
Post by: klaasend on September 10, 2006, 11:28:00 PM
Joran's June 9th suspect statement:


We drove back to the Holiday Inn Hotel to drop Natalee off there. When we arrived there Deepak parked on the left lane and not on the right lane that lies in front of the Lobby. Natalee got out the back door on the right side and she fell to the floor. I got out of the same car door and helped her get up. After I did that Natalee said to me not to touch her and she walked into the direction/towards the lobby. I saw that she touched a pillar. We did not kiss and I got back into the car. Then we drove home. Later, when we just found out she had gone missing Deepak and Satish told me that they had seen a guard dressed in black when we were driving off. According to them the guard also had a walkie talkie in his hands. Deepak and Satish said that the guard walked towards/in the direction of Natalee. (with Natalee is meant the missing woman named "Natalee Ann HOLLOWAY"; comment Jacobs).


Title: Lively Case Discussion #522 9/10 - 9/12/2006
Post by: SunFreak2 on September 10, 2006, 11:31:19 PM
Quote from: "igsigs"


You're welcome SPOCK. Seeing this Lejuez interview was shocking to me. The prosecuter is saying that Joran does not implicate the SGs on 5/31. That much is clear to me. It's starting to look like Jacobs is trying to get them all on the same page. And Janssen.


I thought Deepak said he was responsible for that part of the lie.  He embellished the story that first night with the Twittys.  He admitted and apologized to the SGs.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #522 9/10 - 9/12/2006
Post by: igsigs on September 10, 2006, 11:33:00 PM
Quote from: "klaasend"
Joran's June 9th suspect statement:


We drove back to the Holiday Inn Hotel to drop Natalee off there. When we arrived there Deepak parked on the left lane and not on the right lane that lies in front of the Lobby. Natalee got out the back door on the right side and she fell to the floor. I got out of the same car door and helped her get up. After I did that Natalee said to me not to touch her and she walked into the direction/towards the lobby. I saw that she touched a pillar. We did not kiss and I got back into the car. Then we drove home. Later, when we just found out she had gone missing Deepak and Satish told me that they had seen a guard dressed in black when we were driving off. According to them the guard also had a walkie talkie in his hands. Deepak and Satish said that the guard walked towards/in the direction of Natalee. (with Natalee is meant the missing woman named "Natalee Ann HOLLOWAY"; comment Jacobs).


This is interesting. Following what SB is saying, here Joran is seperating himself from the SG story.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #522 9/10 - 9/12/2006
Post by: sb on September 10, 2006, 11:33:09 PM
I just find the whole 2 SG's matter to be suspicious.

There was no pre-existing vendetta against AJ and MJ where anyone would want to set them up. Why randomly pick out 2 guys for no good reason? Why not have the cover story just say, we left her by herself at the HI driveway entrance? That is the easiest and smoothest story to tell.

For some reason, the Kalpoes were told to say that 2 guys were there.

Why?


Title: Lively Case Discussion #522 9/10 - 9/12/2006
Post by: Ono on September 10, 2006, 11:33:17 PM
Quote from: "memphis"
Quote from: "Anna"
.
My, those Kelpoe boys are certainly into the fabric fiber content to both comment that the pants were cotton.  Nothing but natural fibers for those guards, huh?   :roll:


 :lol:  :lol:
Definately odd details both to remember!


 :lol: Sounds like something The Fab Five would say..LOL!


Title: Lively Case Discussion #522 9/10 - 9/12/2006
Post by: MisGivings on September 10, 2006, 11:33:58 PM
Can someone please direct me to a discussion about Larry Garrison and his supposed new lead?
I am completely lost here with all that has been discussed of late.
TIA.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #522 9/10 - 9/12/2006
Post by: Lala'sMom on September 10, 2006, 11:34:43 PM
Quote from: "SunFreak2"
I wish we knew who it was with her at the Wyndham argueing with her over buying a piece of jewelry.  Has anyone ever confirmed that story and the video or is that just an internet rumor from RU?


It could be a figment of Julia's imagination...did I say that?  Yes, I did.  :lol:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #522 9/10 - 9/12/2006
Post by: Spock on September 10, 2006, 11:35:39 PM
Quote from: "klaasend"
Joran's June 9th suspect statement:


We drove back to the Holiday Inn Hotel to drop Natalee off there. When we arrived there Deepak parked on the left lane and not on the right lane that lies in front of the Lobby. Natalee got out the back door on the right side and she fell to the floor. I got out of the same car door and helped her get up. After I did that Natalee said to me not to touch her and she walked into the direction/towards the lobby. I saw that she touched a pillar. We did not kiss and I got back into the car. Then we drove home. Later, when we just found out she had gone missing Deepak and Satish told me that they had seen a guard dressed in black when we were driving off. According to them the guard also had a walkie talkie in his hands. Deepak and Satish said that the guard walked towards/in the direction of Natalee. (with Natalee is meant the missing woman named "Natalee Ann HOLLOWAY"; comment Jacobs).


Thanks Klaas, odd that we can't review the 5/31 Joran statement to see if he discussed a walk on the beach by the fisherman huts. Jacobs had a reason (tip) for asking that question of D and S.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #522 9/10 - 9/12/2006
Post by: Ono on September 10, 2006, 11:36:10 PM
Quote from: "San"
Quote from: "terryd270"
Jacobs seems to be everywhere?  Is he sleeping with Julia Renfro?

No comment :lol:


 :shock:  :lol: What a 'visual' !


Title: Lively Case Discussion #522 9/10 - 9/12/2006
Post by: the big hammer on September 10, 2006, 11:36:27 PM
"MISSING" jvds Witness Statement

sb writes: "...The Kalpoes, unknowingly, were set up to mention the 2 guys and become canaries (and we know what the bad guys do those who sing)..."

IMO, the most direct and simple reason for jvds "witness" statement to be missing, especially at time of K2 attorney press story which is dated June 9, 2005 would be that it doesn't exist (or that it has been destroyed).

IMO, wholly possible that jvds never gave an "Official" witness statement, though he may have said many things to polis and others.

And now if you were Paulus, and looking for some insurance, or even looking for a way to set up k2 and get the goon child off free and clear, do you think you would consider witholding a "witness statement" made by son, and allowing INTENTIONALLY FALSE witness statements to be signed by k2 -- thereby exposing k2 to perjury/false witness, obstruction and contempt charges?

I sure do.

With those false witness statements signed, submitted and on file, who do you think looks "more guilty."  That would be k2.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #522 9/10 - 9/12/2006
Post by: igsigs on September 10, 2006, 11:37:17 PM
Quote from: "SunFreak2"
Quote from: "igsigs"


You're welcome SPOCK. Seeing this Lejuez interview was shocking to me. The prosecuter is saying that Joran does not implicate the SGs on 5/31. That much is clear to me. It's starting to look like Jacobs is trying to get them all on the same page. And Janssen.


I thought Deepak said he was responsible for that part of the lie.  He embellished the story that first night with the Twittys.  He admitted and apologized to the SGs.

Yes. In the backseat tapes Deepak admits the SG story was his baby. Joran alternately has blamed it on himself and Deepak together and just Deepak.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #522 9/10 - 9/12/2006
Post by: Carnut on September 10, 2006, 11:38:05 PM
Quote from: "Lala'sMom"
Quote from: "SunFreak2"
I wish we knew who it was with her at the Wyndham argueing with her over buying a piece of jewelry.  Has anyone ever confirmed that story and the video or is that just an internet rumor from RU?


It could be a figment of Julia's imagination...did I say that?  Yes, I did.  :lol:


That's what I always thought it was, along with the cabbie blue eyed dutch marine story.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #522 9/10 - 9/12/2006
Post by: Lala'sMom on September 10, 2006, 11:39:41 PM
Quote from: "klaasend"
Joran's June 9th suspect statement:


We drove back to the Holiday Inn Hotel to drop Natalee off there. When we arrived there Deepak parked on the left lane and not on the right lane that lies in front of the Lobby. Natalee got out the back door on the right side and she fell to the floor. I got out of the same car door and helped her get up. After I did that Natalee said to me not to touch her and she walked into the direction/towards the lobby. I saw that she touched a pillar. We did not kiss and I got back into the car. Then we drove home. Later, when we just found out she had gone missing Deepak and Satish told me that they had seen a guard dressed in black when we were driving off. According to them the guard also had a walkie talkie in his hands. Deepak and Satish said that the guard walked towards/in the direction of Natalee. (with Natalee is meant the missing woman named "Natalee Ann HOLLOWAY"; comment Jacobs).


The plan was to implicate the K2 all along.  Deepak was telling the truth when he said they all had sex with her and Joran knew he needed another alibi and so he was planning to let the K2s take the fall...then Beth happened.  They never expected a mother with such determination.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #522 9/10 - 9/12/2006
Post by: Carnut on September 10, 2006, 11:40:37 PM
Quote from: "the big hammer"
"MISSING" jvds Witness Statement

sb writes: "...The Kalpoes, unknowingly, were set up to mention the 2 guys and become canaries (and we know what the bad guys do those who sing)..."

IMO, the most direct and simple reason for jvds "witness" statement to be missing, especially at time of K2 attorney press story which is dated June 9, 2005 would be that it doesn't exist (or that it has been destroyed).

IMO, wholly possible that jvds never gave an "Official" witness statement, though he may have said many things to polis and others.

And now if you were Paulus, and looking for some insurance, or even looking for a way to set up k2 and get the goon child off free and clear, do you think you would consider witholding a "witness statement" made by son, and allowing INTENTIONALLY FALSE witness statements to be signed by k2 -- thereby exposing k2 to perjury/false witness, obstruction and contempt charges?

I sure do.

With those false witness statements signed, submitted and on file, who do you think looks "more guilty."  That would be k2.


Yes, now looking at the statements, that appears to be what was happening.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #522 9/10 - 9/12/2006
Post by: Kat_Gram on September 10, 2006, 11:40:37 PM
Quote from: "Spock"
Quote from: "Ono"
Quote from: "Spock"
Don't believe for a minute that Janssen cant charge and prosecute the "witnesses" for signing false declarations. There is no truth to the "supercede" theory or any other BS you might hear. They lied, it led to the false arrest of others, it took the heat off of them for awhile, and now its time to prosecute. Charges please.


That's what I think too...in fact, it's way past time to prosecute.


Nancy Grace had a Dutch law professor on the show last fall and he clarified three points: (1) if there are false witness statements they can and should be charged for obstruction, (2) making false declarations is a serious crime resulting in jail time (3) plea bargaining is allowed at the discretion of the prosecutor, the judge, and the defense attorney.

My understanding of this was that they could charge the K Bros with making false statements as witnesses, but then they could not up the charges. This leaves the question: What do they do with Joran ?
He didn't point the finger at the guards, it was the Kalpoes.
There were no charges against Steve Croes either .


Title: Lively Case Discussion #522 9/10 - 9/12/2006
Post by: Lala'sMom on September 10, 2006, 11:41:23 PM
Quote from: "MisGivings"
Can someone please direct me to a discussion about Larry Garrison and his supposed new lead?
I am completely lost here with all that has been discussed of late.
TIA.


Hi there, it's good to see you.  I am sorry, I don't know where that discussion is...I missed it as well.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #522 9/10 - 9/12/2006
Post by: Lala'sMom on September 10, 2006, 11:42:45 PM
Quote from: "Ono"
Quote from: "San"
Quote from: "terryd270"
Jacobs seems to be everywhere?  Is he sleeping with Julia Renfro?

No comment :lol:


 :shock:  :lol: What a 'visual' !


Sounds more like a nightmare to me.  :lol:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #522 9/10 - 9/12/2006
Post by: klaasend on September 10, 2006, 11:45:14 PM
Quote from: "Spock"
Quote from: "klaasend"
Joran's June 9th suspect statement:


We drove back to the Holiday Inn Hotel to drop Natalee off there. When we arrived there Deepak parked on the left lane and not on the right lane that lies in front of the Lobby. Natalee got out the back door on the right side and she fell to the floor. I got out of the same car door and helped her get up. After I did that Natalee said to me not to touch her and she walked into the direction/towards the lobby. I saw that she touched a pillar. We did not kiss and I got back into the car. Then we drove home. Later, when we just found out she had gone missing Deepak and Satish told me that they had seen a guard dressed in black when we were driving off. According to them the guard also had a walkie talkie in his hands. Deepak and Satish said that the guard walked towards/in the direction of Natalee. (with Natalee is meant the missing woman named "Natalee Ann HOLLOWAY"; comment Jacobs).


Thanks Klaas, odd that we can't review the 5/31 Joran statement to see if he discussed a walk on the beach by the fisherman huts. Jacobs had a reason (tip) for asking that question of D and S.

You are assuming we don't have or aren't going to be able to review Joran's 5/31 statement.  I don't know that's the case.  I say let's wait and see if it becomes available...I really don't know if it is but I'm not ready to say it's not.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #522 9/10 - 9/12/2006
Post by: SunFreak2 on September 10, 2006, 11:45:46 PM
Quote from: "the big hammer"
"MISSING" jvds Witness Statement

sb writes: "...The Kalpoes, unknowingly, were set up to mention the 2 guys and become canaries (and we know what the bad guys do those who sing)..."

IMO, the most direct and simple reason for jvds "witness" statement to be missing, especially at time of K2 attorney press story which is dated June 9, 2005 would be that it doesn't exist (or that it has been destroyed).

IMO, wholly possible that jvds never gave an "Official" witness statement, though he may have said many things to polis and others.

And now if you were Paulus, and looking for some insurance, or even looking for a way to set up k2 and get the goon child off free and clear, do you think you would consider witholding a "witness statement" made by son, and allowing INTENTIONALLY FALSE witness statements to be signed by k2 -- thereby exposing k2 to perjury/false witness, obstruction and contempt charges?

I sure do.

With those false witness statements signed, submitted and on file, who do you think looks "more guilty."  That would be k2.


I agree Hammer.  Didn't Joran say that he called Deepak in the middle of giving his own statement to ask Deepak what Natalee had been wearing?  I've never heard of any police allowing someone to call someone else to ask them for details while giving a statement.  Didn't he also warn Deepak that he & Satish would have to give a statements later that day? Somethink is hinky with this whole deal of witness statements given on 5/31.  Why would the polis pickup Deepak & Satish for their statements, yet Paulus was allowed to go get Joran and deliver him to the poliz?  And why at the Bubali precint & not at Noord?  How many precints are there in Aruba? When Dave arrived in Aruba he says he had to go to 3 different precints to find someone who knew about NAtalee's case.  I wonder if he stopped at the Bubali precint?


Title: Lively Case Discussion #522 9/10 - 9/12/2006
Post by: klaasend on September 10, 2006, 11:47:49 PM
Quote from: "MisGivings"
Can someone please direct me to a discussion about Larry Garrison and his supposed new lead?
I am completely lost here with all that has been discussed of late.
TIA.

There really wasn't much said.  It was pretty vague:

GMA....9/7

Larry Garrison was on talking about the case in Aruba...also plugging his book.....he said, right now that someone has come forward in this case, and is telling everything they know. He of course wouldn't elaborate.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #522 9/10 - 9/12/2006
Post by: Lala'sMom on September 10, 2006, 11:48:36 PM
I think I am calling it a night.  See you monkeys later.  Has anyone seen CP405 lately?  Hugs to Nemo.   :wink:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #522 9/10 - 9/12/2006
Post by: sb on September 10, 2006, 11:49:05 PM
I agree w/ Hammer that PVDS may have set them up THAT way.

What I am trying to derive is the methodology whereby the K2 decided to tell a story of 2 SG's that didn't exist. We KNOW the HI scenario is fiction with-or without- the 2 guys anyway. What prompted them to fit the 2 guys in there? Either:

1. Paulus told them to say it, or

2. They came up with the idea as an embellishment of what Paulus told them to say.

All right, in the K2's shoes for a second (ugh)... Paulus is the Master of All Things, the Benefactor, the Hope of exoneration, the Big Wheel who will get them OFF THE HOOK. He gives them a story. What would you do with the story if in their spot?

In their spot, they hew to the Party Line, CHAPTER, VERSE, VERBATIM, down to the last jot and tittle. NO editorializing, NO embellishments. Stick to the script, boys, and all will be well.

Besides, I don't think either of them is smart enough to think up an additional detail like that.

I believe for some esoteric reason, Paulus included the SG sequence as part of the cover story. Now why?


Title: Lively Case Discussion #522 9/10 - 9/12/2006
Post by: klaasend on September 10, 2006, 11:49:07 PM
Quote from: "Lala'sMom"
I think I am calling it a night.  See you monkeys later.  Has anyone seen CP405 lately?  Hugs to Nemo.   :wink:


Nite Lala's - no I haven't seen CP405.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #522 9/10 - 9/12/2006
Post by: Ono on September 10, 2006, 11:50:57 PM
Quote from: "igsigs"
CHRIS LEJUEZ, ATTORNEY FOR ABRAHAM JONES: Nancy, i have seen only the statements of two of the three men. The evidence that i got, the documentation, the files that i recieved from the prosecuter's office contained only two of the statements.

My colleague has asked the prosecuter why only the two, not the one of the Dutch boy? She was told by the prosecuter, at least by the prosecuter's office, that the statement would not be relevant to the case of her suspect, her client.

http://transcripts.cnn.com/TRANSCRIPTS/0506/09/ng.01.html

 :arrow: Was Joran's 5/31 statement "not relevant" to the case against the SGs because...he did not include them in his statement? Did Joran abandon the HI lie on 5/31?


Oh..I remember this now...This statement most likely nailed Joran on something...


Title: Lively Case Discussion #522 9/10 - 9/12/2006
Post by: klaasend on September 10, 2006, 11:53:56 PM
Quote from: "sb"
I agree w/ Hammer that PVDS may have set them up THAT way.

What I am trying to derive is the methodology whereby the K2 decided to tell a story of 2 SG's that didn't exist. We KNOW the HI scenario is fiction with-or without- the 2 guys anyway. What prompted them to fit the 2 guys in there? Either:

1. Paulus told them to say it, or

2. They came up with the idea as an embellishment of what Paulus told them to say.

All right, in the K2's shoes for a second (ugh)... Paulus is the Master of All Things, the Benefactor, the Hope of exoneration, the Big Wheel who will get them OFF THE HOOK. He gives them a story. What would you do with the story if in their spot?

In their spot, they hew to the Party Line, CHAPTER, VERSE, VERBATIM, down to the last jot and tittle. NO editorializing, NO embellishments. Stick to the script, boys, and all will be well.

Besides, I don't think either of them is smart enough to think up an additional detail like that.

I believe for some esoteric reason, Paulus included the SG sequence as part of the cover story. Now why?

1.  Because Joran leaving an obviously drunk girl to fend for herself would seem better if Joran left her in the hands of a security guard?

2.  Because PVDS knew that some of the SG's sold drugs to the tourists and would be easy targets?

3.  Paulus didn't expect Beth, Jug and Dave to show up and ruin his plans otherwise the SG and HI story would have worked?


Title: Lively Case Discussion #522 9/10 - 9/12/2006
Post by: SunFreak2 on September 10, 2006, 11:54:29 PM
Quote from: "sb"
I agree w/ Hammer that PVDS may have set them up THAT way.

What I am trying to derive is the methodology whereby the K2 decided to tell a story of 2 SG's that didn't exist. We KNOW the HI scenario is fiction with-or without- the 2 guys anyway. What prompted them to fit the 2 guys in there? Either:

1. Paulus told them to say it, or

2. They came up with the idea as an embellishment of what Paulus told them to say.

All right, in the K2's shoes for a second (ugh)... Paulus is the Master of All Things, the Benefactor, the Hope of exoneration, the Big Wheel who will get them OFF THE HOOK. He gives them a story. What would you do with the story if in their spot?

In their spot, they hew to the Party Line, CHAPTER, VERSE, VERBATIM, down to the last jot and tittle. NO editorializing, NO embellishments. Stick to the script, boys, and all will be well.

Besides, I don't think either of them is smart enough to think up an additional detail like that.

I believe for some esoteric reason, Paulus included the SG sequence as part of the cover story. Now why?


Had the 4 girls reported the attempted break-in while they were taking their nap? They said they saw what was a the backside of someone dressed in black rounding the corner just as they got to the sliding door.   Paulus must have thrown the SG guard in b/c of this report, and then Jacobs, the narcotics officer, got Boeti to say it was Johns & Jones.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #522 9/10 - 9/12/2006
Post by: San on September 10, 2006, 11:55:33 PM
Quote from: "klaasend"
Quote from: "sb"
I agree w/ Hammer that PVDS may have set them up THAT way.

What I am trying to derive is the methodology whereby the K2 decided to tell a story of 2 SG's that didn't exist. We KNOW the HI scenario is fiction with-or without- the 2 guys anyway. What prompted them to fit the 2 guys in there? Either:

1. Paulus told them to say it, or

2. They came up with the idea as an embellishment of what Paulus told them to say.

All right, in the K2's shoes for a second (ugh)... Paulus is the Master of All Things, the Benefactor, the Hope of exoneration, the Big Wheel who will get them OFF THE HOOK. He gives them a story. What would you do with the story if in their spot?

In their spot, they hew to the Party Line, CHAPTER, VERSE, VERBATIM, down to the last jot and tittle. NO editorializing, NO embellishments. Stick to the script, boys, and all will be well.

Besides, I don't think either of them is smart enough to think up an additional detail like that.

I believe for some esoteric reason, Paulus included the SG sequence as part of the cover story. Now why?

1.  Because Joran leaving an obviously drunk girl to fend for herself would seem better if Joran left her in the hands of a security guard?

2.  Because PVDS knew that some of the SG's sold drugs to the tourists and would be easy targets?

3.  Paulus didn't expect Beth, Jug and Dave to show up and ruin his plans otherwise the SG and HI story would have worked?

I agree Klaas.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #522 9/10 - 9/12/2006
Post by: Ono on September 10, 2006, 11:55:51 PM
Quote from: "SunFreak2"
I wish we knew who it was with her at the Wyndham argueing with her over buying a piece of jewelry.  Has anyone ever confirmed that story and the video or is that just an internet rumor from RU?


I vote that it's an internet rumor.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #522 9/10 - 9/12/2006
Post by: LilPuma on September 10, 2006, 11:56:53 PM
Quote from: "Lala'sMom"
I think I am calling it a night.  See you monkeys later.  Has anyone seen CP405 lately?  Hugs to Nemo.   :wink:


I saw CP405 in the Monkey Lounge last week.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #522 9/10 - 9/12/2006
Post by: LilPuma on September 11, 2006, 12:04:12 AM
Quote from: "SunFreak2"

Had the 4 girls reported the attempted break-in while they were taking their nap? They said they saw what was a the backside of someone dressed in black rounding the corner just as they got to the sliding door.   Paulus must have thrown the SG guard in b/c of this report, and then Jacobs, the narcotics officer, got Boeti to say it was Johns & Jones.


I'm now wondering if Jacobs came up with the security guard story and the Fisherman's Huts story.  Joran's missing statement tells me he said things that Paulus & Friends didn't want on the record, some of which Jug and friends heard.  Before issuing another statement, they had to get their ducks in a row so that Joran's statement wouldn't incriminate him.  Unfortunately, Charles Croes, Jug and his friends, the DEA agent, and Anita van der Sloot all repeated some of the things he said before vdStraaten, Jacobs and Paulus could cover all their bases.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #522 9/10 - 9/12/2006
Post by: sb on September 11, 2006, 12:08:42 AM
Quote from: "klaasend"
Quote from: "sb"
I agree w/ Hammer that PVDS may have set them up THAT way.

What I am trying to derive is the methodology whereby the K2 decided to tell a story of 2 SG's that didn't exist. We KNOW the HI scenario is fiction with-or without- the 2 guys anyway. What prompted them to fit the 2 guys in there? Either:

1. Paulus told them to say it, or

2. They came up with the idea as an embellishment of what Paulus told them to say.

All right, in the K2's shoes for a second (ugh)... Paulus is the Master of All Things, the Benefactor, the Hope of exoneration, the Big Wheel who will get them OFF THE HOOK. He gives them a story. What would you do with the story if in their spot?

In their spot, they hew to the Party Line, CHAPTER, VERSE, VERBATIM, down to the last jot and tittle. NO editorializing, NO embellishments. Stick to the script, boys, and all will be well.

Besides, I don't think either of them is smart enough to think up an additional detail like that.

I believe for some esoteric reason, Paulus included the SG sequence as part of the cover story. Now why?

1.  Because Joran leaving an obviously drunk girl to fend for herself would seem better if Joran left her in the hands of a security guard?

2.  Because PVDS knew that some of the SG's sold drugs to the tourists and would be easy targets?

3.  Paulus didn't expect Beth, Jug and Dave to show up and ruin his plans otherwise the SG and HI story would have worked?


ALL 3 Could Be true... Taking all 3 in order, my questions would be:

1. Doesn't this work better if Joran HIMSELF says it? "I left her with 2 SGs". This would play into the angle of Anita's "There were adults there" statement. Joran seems to have failed to stick up for himself in this manner.

2. This may be the most plausible reason of the 3, for Paulus to put 2 layers of separation into the mix instead of just 1. Instead of trying to pin it on K2, he lets them pin it on other unknown persons.

3. The story was so transparently full of holes, it likely would have fallen apart even if the HT family had been delayed a month getting down there. If I recall, Beth was far more concerned with searches than in proving or disproving the veracity of anyone's story. She only went proactive in calling for the SG's release when it was obvious to HER that they were a rabbit trail and a dead end that was erroneously being run down, that confused the investigation and put roadblocks in the way of finding Natalee. Her immediate influence in disproving the story was not so great at first. In other words, she didn't oppose the story and interfere, until more or less after the fact.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #522 9/10 - 9/12/2006
Post by: San on September 11, 2006, 12:10:42 AM
Quote from: "LilPuma"
Quote from: "SunFreak2"

Had the 4 girls reported the attempted break-in while they were taking their nap? They said they saw what was a the backside of someone dressed in black rounding the corner just as they got to the sliding door.   Paulus must have thrown the SG guard in b/c of this report, and then Jacobs, the narcotics officer, got Boeti to say it was Johns & Jones.


I'm now wondering if Jacobs came up with the security guard story and the Fisherman's Huts story.  Joran's missing statement tells me he said things that Paulus & Friends didn't want on the record, some of which Jug and friends heard.  Before issuing another statement, they had to get their ducks in a row so that Joran's statement wouldn't incriminate him.  Unfortunately, Charles Croes, Jug and his friends, the DEA agent, and Anita van der Sloot all repeated some of the things he said before vdStraaten, Jacobs and Paulus could cover all their bases.

I agree.  Joran said something wrong or mentioned someone she should not have.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #522 9/10 - 9/12/2006
Post by: SunFreak2 on September 11, 2006, 12:12:34 AM
Quote from: "LilPuma"


I'm now wondering if Jacobs came up with the security guard story and the Fisherman's Huts story.  Joran's missing statement tells me he said things that Paulus & Friends didn't want on the record, some of which Jug and friends heard.  Before issuing another statement, they had to get their ducks in a row so that Joran's statement wouldn't incriminate him.  Unfortunately, Charles Croes, Jug and his friends, the DEA agent, and Anita van der Sloot all repeated some of the things he said before vdStraaten, Jacobs and Paulus could cover all their bases.


:::::waving back at LilPuma:::::

Good point.  Jossy seems to believe it vdSTraaten being an honest cop.  Oduber & vdSTraaten were at odds.  It doesn't make sense that the top cop & the PM would be at odds if they were both corrupt.  So if we consider vd Straaten to be good cop, and Jacobs the dirty cop, how would this change the scenario of the cover-up?


Title: Lively Case Discussion #522 9/10 - 9/12/2006
Post by: the big hammer on September 11, 2006, 12:13:55 AM
Deepak: Off the Reservation on 6/11

Deepak comes out w/ the beach drop-off story on 6/11 in his "suspect statement" -- breaking the party line on the HI story and "officially" goes off the reservation...

WHY?

After all, he has lied as a "witness" in a capital crime case, he has perjured himself and is open to numerous additional charges.  His attorney learns that there is no "relevant" jvds "witness" statement on 6/9. (And this TRUE, whether a jvds witness statement exists or not.) And within 48 hours, deepak is singing a completely different tune.

I believe deepak and his attorneys correctly surmised and deduced they were being set up.  And this would be wholly keeping w/ Paulus method of having a "plan B" if the arrest of the guards failed to produce desired outcome.  The longer k2 sticks with HI lie, the worse the perjury gets, the worse the potential obstruction charges get.

To protect himself and his brother, he goes off the reservation.  He tells the "truth" on 6/11 -- directly implicating jvds as last person w/ Natalee.  He does so because he is threatened and exposed.

The stated "IRRELEVANCE" of the jvd witness statement by k2 attorney is clear signal, during 6/9-6/11 w/ security guard/HI story collapsing, the sloots will try to pin k2, and their own FALSE WITNESS statements are Exhibit 1.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #522 9/10 - 9/12/2006
Post by: SunFreak2 on September 11, 2006, 12:22:37 AM
Quote from: "the big hammer"
Deepak: Off the Reservation on 6/11

Deepak comes out w/ the beach drop-off story on 6/11 in his "suspect statement" -- breaking the party line on the HI story and "officially" goes off the reservation...

WHY?

After all, he has lied as a "witness" in a capital crime case, he has perjured himself and is open to numerous additional charges.  His attorney learns that there is no "relevant" jvds "witness" statement on 6/9. (And this TRUE, whether a jvds witness statement exists or not.) And within 48 hours, deepak is singing a completely different tune.

I believe deepak and his attorneys correctly surmised and deduced they were being set up.  And this would be wholly keeping w/ Paulus method of having a "plan B" if the arrest of the guards failed to produce desired outcome.  The longer k2 sticks with HI lie, the worse the perjury gets, the worse the potential obstruction charges get.

To protect himself and his brother, he goes off the reservation.  He tells the "truth" on 6/11 -- directly implicating jvds as last person w/ Natalee.  He does so because he is threatened and exposed.

The stated "IRRELEVANCE" of the jvd witness statement by k2 attorney is clear signal, during 6/9-6/11 w/ security guard/HI story collapsing, the sloots will try to pin k2, and their own FALSE WITNESS statements are Exhibit 1.


So if there was a 6/10 confession, we can assume it wasn't Deepak's if he changes his story on 6/11 to distance himself from the HI lies.  Or maybe it is to back Joran's 2nd set of lies about the FH's to keep the heat away from the real site of the crime.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #522 9/10 - 9/12/2006
Post by: crazybabyborg on September 11, 2006, 12:23:56 AM
Quote from: "sb"
Quote from: "klaasend"
Quote from: "sb"
I agree w/ Hammer that PVDS may have set them up THAT way.

What I am trying to derive is the methodology whereby the K2 decided to tell a story of 2 SG's that didn't exist. We KNOW the HI scenario is fiction with-or without- the 2 guys anyway. What prompted them to fit the 2 guys in there? Either:

1. Paulus told them to say it, or

2. They came up with the idea as an embellishment of what Paulus told them to say.

All right, in the K2's shoes for a second (ugh)... Paulus is the Master of All Things, the Benefactor, the Hope of exoneration, the Big Wheel who will get them OFF THE HOOK. He gives them a story. What would you do with the story if in their spot?

In their spot, they hew to the Party Line, CHAPTER, VERSE, VERBATIM, down to the last jot and tittle. NO editorializing, NO embellishments. Stick to the script, boys, and all will be well.

Besides, I don't think either of them is smart enough to think up an additional detail like that.

I believe for some esoteric reason, Paulus included the SG sequence as part of the cover story. Now why?

1.  Because Joran leaving an obviously drunk girl to fend for herself would seem better if Joran left her in the hands of a security guard?

2.  Because PVDS knew that some of the SG's sold drugs to the tourists and would be easy targets?

3.  Paulus didn't expect Beth, Jug and Dave to show up and ruin his plans otherwise the SG and HI story would have worked?


ALL 3 Could Be true... Taking all 3 in order, my questions would be:

1. Doesn't this work better if Joran HIMSELF says it? "I left her with 2 SGs". This would play into the angle of Anita's "There were adults there" statement. Joran seems to have failed to stick up for himself in this manner.

2. This may be the most plausible reason of the 3, for Paulus to put 2 layers of separation into the mix instead of just 1. Instead of trying to pin it on K2, he lets them pin it on other unknown persons.

3. The story was so transparently full of holes, it likely would have fallen apart even if the HT family had been delayed a month getting down there. If I recall, Beth was far more concerned with searches than in proving or disproving the veracity of anyone's story. She only went proactive in calling for the SG's release when it was obvious to HER that they were a rabbit trail and a dead end that was erroneously being run down, that confused the investigation and put roadblocks in the way of finding Natalee. Her immediate influence in disproving the story was not so great at first. In other words, she didn't oppose the story and interfere, until more or less after the fact.


I've always thought that the insertion of the 2 Security Guards was due to a key missing word: 2 BLACK Security guards. My impression is that racism is alive and well on Aruba, and particularly in the VDS mind. I remember the insertion of Natalee's ALLEDGED slave comments re: K2. There seems to be a mindset that inserting race can help them solve something or distract blame away from them.


HI GUYS!


Title: Lively Case Discussion #522 9/10 - 9/12/2006
Post by: sb on September 11, 2006, 12:26:04 AM
2 other deep, mysterious tidbits from that night still haunt me to this day, and they have IMO never been adequately discussed. Anyone remember the following 2 facts/rumors/opinions?

1. The report of 2 men dragging a hysterical female into a car in the N part of the hotel strip area.

2. The forum post where someone addressed Joran and asked about his "3:45 AM boat ride".

We are digging deep into the fateful night... why don't we bring these up as well?


Title: Lively Case Discussion #522 9/10 - 9/12/2006
Post by: klaasend on September 11, 2006, 12:28:54 AM
Quote from: "the big hammer"
Deepak: Off the Reservation on 6/11

Deepak comes out w/ the beach drop-off story on 6/11 in his "suspect statement" -- breaking the party line on the HI story and "officially" goes off the reservation...

WHY?

After all, he has lied as a "witness" in a capital crime case, he has perjured himself and is open to numerous additional charges.  His attorney learns that there is no "relevant" jvds "witness" statement on 6/9. (And this TRUE, whether a jvds witness statement exists or not.) And within 48 hours, deepak is singing a completely different tune.

I believe deepak and his attorneys correctly surmised and deduced they were being set up.  And this would be wholly keeping w/ Paulus method of having a "plan B" if the arrest of the guards failed to produce desired outcome.  The longer k2 sticks with HI lie, the worse the perjury gets, the worse the potential obstruction charges get.

To protect himself and his brother, he goes off the reservation.  He tells the "truth" on 6/11 -- directly implicating jvds as last person w/ Natalee.  He does so because he is threatened and exposed.

The stated "IRRELEVANCE" of the jvd witness statement by k2 attorney is clear signal, during 6/9-6/11 w/ security guard/HI story collapsing, the sloots will try to pin k2, and their own FALSE WITNESS statements are Exhibit 1.


Let's not forget about the CONFESSION/RETRACTION!


Title: Lively Case Discussion #522 9/10 - 9/12/2006
Post by: klaasend on September 11, 2006, 12:30:58 AM
Quote from: "sb"
2 other deep, mysterious tidbits from that night still haunt me to this day, and they have IMO never been adequately discussed. Anyone remember the following 2 facts/rumors/opinions?

1. The report of 2 men dragging a hysterical female into a car in the N part of the hotel strip area.

2. The forum post where someone addressed Joran and asked about his "3:45 AM boat ride".

We are digging deep into the fateful night... why don't we bring these up as well?


#2 - I was actually posting in the TripAdvisor forum when that post about the 3:45 am boat ride was posted.  They deleted it soon after it was posted claiming it was a troll/hoax.  I'm not so sure now.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #522 9/10 - 9/12/2006
Post by: sb on September 11, 2006, 12:31:11 AM
But on that note... the dreaded "eyelid" rule is coming into play... I am starting to fall asleep at the keyboard.

I'm going to sign off but I think we should go through this and re-examine ALL of the movements on Aruba that night. There simply HAS to be an answer beneath all the garbage (I'm not primarily referring to the landfill).

See y'all tomorrow!


Title: Lively Case Discussion #522 9/10 - 9/12/2006
Post by: crazybabyborg on September 11, 2006, 12:31:55 AM
Quote from: "sb"
2 other deep, mysterious tidbits from that night still haunt me to this day, and they have IMO never been adequately discussed. Anyone remember the following 2 facts/rumors/opinions?

1. The report of 2 men dragging a hysterical female into a car in the N part of the hotel strip area.

2. The forum post where someone addressed Joran and asked about his "3:45 AM boat ride".

We are digging deep into the fateful night... why don't we bring these up as well?


sb, I remember your points, but have forgotten the source of the hysterical female report. Do you recall where that came from? TIA


Title: Lively Case Discussion #522 9/10 - 9/12/2006
Post by: SunFreak2 on September 11, 2006, 12:32:09 AM
Quote from: "sb"
2 other deep, mysterious tidbits from that night still haunt me to this day, and they have IMO never been adequately discussed. Anyone remember the following 2 facts/rumors/opinions?

1. The report of 2 men dragging a hysterical female into a car in the N part of the hotel strip area.

2. The forum post where someone addressed Joran and asked about his "3:45 AM boat ride".

We are digging deep into the fateful night... why don't we bring these up as well?


This was supposedly a maid at the Marriott Resort who heard a female screaming and looked out a window and saw this.  Yet did she report it to anyone at the time?  I think it's another rumor just like the HI dumpster story.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #522 9/10 - 9/12/2006
Post by: Anna on September 11, 2006, 12:34:57 AM
.
Is it not a single security guard the Kelpoes claim to have seen with Natalee instead of two?  I read both their statements as speaking of a solitary, sole guard, not two guards.

Remember Anita first said there were "adults" where Joran left Natalee, too. so there again, who does she mean?  People at the HI?  

But is it not a single guard they report seeing approaching Natalee?  True, he does have the walkie talkie and appears to be using it.  That would require a second person I would assume but as far as their false story, doesn't it just speak of the one guard?  

And yet two were arrested.   :shock:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #522 9/10 - 9/12/2006
Post by: LilPuma on September 11, 2006, 12:37:27 AM
Quote from: "SunFreak2"
Quote from: "LilPuma"


I'm now wondering if Jacobs came up with the security guard story and the Fisherman's Huts story.  Joran's missing statement tells me he said things that Paulus & Friends didn't want on the record, some of which Jug and friends heard.  Before issuing another statement, they had to get their ducks in a row so that Joran's statement wouldn't incriminate him.  Unfortunately, Charles Croes, Jug and his friends, the DEA agent, and Anita van der Sloot all repeated some of the things he said before vdStraaten, Jacobs and Paulus could cover all their bases.


:::::waving back at LilPuma:::::

Good point.  Jossy seems to believe it vdSTraaten being an honest cop.  Oduber & vdSTraaten were at odds.  It doesn't make sense that the top cop & the PM would be at odds if they were both corrupt.  So if we consider vd Straaten to be good cop, and Jacobs the dirty cop, how would this change the scenario of the cover-up?


Uh boy, I need to process these new possibilities.  I always thought that vdStraaten, who didn't want to do this to his friend's son, was the guy who assigned Jacobs to the case and orchestrated the coverup.  I even thought that Oduber and Rudy Croes were complicit, perhaps to keep their own "indiscretions" secret.  Oduber supposedly had vdStraaten's office searched before he left - vdStraaten was very angry.  vdStraaten was seen with Jacobs after leaving Aruba and he wasn't supposed to be there.  Oduber twice asked for FBI involvement.  Sure doesn't look to me like vdStraaten is the honest cop.  Now we have reason to suspect that Jacobs came up with the idea of the FH dropoff.  He's always been our suspect for hand-picking the two guards to arrest.   :?  I have to process this.   :(


Title: Lively Case Discussion #522 9/10 - 9/12/2006
Post by: Shell on September 11, 2006, 12:42:52 AM
Quote from: "Sam"
San , I am not sure what a crackhead looks like. LOL

I thought he was kinda cute. Had a friendly looking smile. JMHO


lol, looks like a crackhead to me too, old beyond his years, but the sun will do that to a person too


Title: Lively Case Discussion #522 9/10 - 9/12/2006
Post by: Shell on September 11, 2006, 12:44:21 AM
Now I have to back read, just getting here again, good to see you Louise


Title: Lively Case Discussion #522 9/10 - 9/12/2006
Post by: Anna on September 11, 2006, 12:45:59 AM
Quote from: "sb"
2 other deep, mysterious tidbits from that night still haunt me to this day, and they have IMO never been adequately discussed. Anyone remember the following 2 facts/rumors/opinions?

1. The report of 2 men dragging a hysterical female into a car in the N part of the hotel strip area.

2. The forum post where someone addressed Joran and asked about his "3:45 AM boat ride".

We are digging deep into the fateful night... why don't we bring these up as well?


SB,
Wasn't the source of Item #1 Steve Croes?  Was he the only one who claimed to have heard this hysterical woman?  I seem to remember Sleuth stating that he could not have heard it from his vantage onboard the Tattoo that night, is that correct?  If no one heard it except SCroes, I just can't believe anything he says or any of the PIMP crew really.

The second Item I have not heard before I don't think.


.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #522 9/10 - 9/12/2006
Post by: SunFreak2 on September 11, 2006, 12:53:53 AM
Quote from: "Anna"
.
Is it not a single security guard the Kelpoes claim to have seen with Natalee instead of two?  I read both their statements as speaking of a solitary, sole guard, not two guards.

Remember Anita first said there were "adults" where Joran left Natalee, too. so there again, who does she mean?  People at the HI?  

But is it not a single guard they report seeing approaching Natalee?  True, he does have the walkie talkie and appears to be using it.  That would require a second person I would assume but as far as their false story, doesn't it just speak of the one guard?  

And yet two were arrested.   :shock:


Yep Anna, 2 arrested, one mentioned in the witness statements.   Did Joran actually say that about getting her safely back to adults first or was  that Anita, and then Joran followed suit in his Current Affair interview?


Title: Lively Case Discussion #522 9/10 - 9/12/2006
Post by: SunFreak2 on September 11, 2006, 12:57:42 AM
Quote from: "Anna"
Quote from: "sb"
2 other deep, mysterious tidbits from that night still haunt me to this day, and they have IMO never been adequately discussed. Anyone remember the following 2 facts/rumors/opinions?

1. The report of 2 men dragging a hysterical female into a car in the N part of the hotel strip area.

2. The forum post where someone addressed Joran and asked about his "3:45 AM boat ride".

We are digging deep into the fateful night... why don't we bring these up as well?


SB,
Wasn't the source of Item #1 Steve Croes?  Was he the only one who claimed to have heard this hysterical woman?  I seem to remember Sleuth stating that he could not have heard it from his vantage onboard the Tattoo that night, is that correct?  If no one heard it except SCroes, I just can't believe anything he says or any of the PIMP crew really.

The second Item I have not heard before I don't think.


.


IIRC, the source of #1 was a maid at the Marriott who heard a female scream, looked out a window and saw it happening.  My question is if this happened did she report it to the poice or the hotel security or anyone at the time it occurred?


Title: Lively Case Discussion #522 9/10 - 9/12/2006
Post by: Anna on September 11, 2006, 12:58:32 AM
.
OK, just wanting to keep that straight that the Kelpoes claimed only ONE guard and yet TWO arrested.  That seems to mean something to me in some obscure way.

I heard Anita say that about Joran leaving Natalee with adults but then she would likely count the Kelpoes as adults compared to her deilcious baby sporter.  Not sure if Joran claimed that himself or not.  

I need to process this as Li'lPuma said.  If they did not like Joran's statement of 5/31, why didn't they just make up one as vdStraaten did later?  Something about that I need to think about as well.

.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #522 9/10 - 9/12/2006
Post by: SunFreak2 on September 11, 2006, 12:59:51 AM
I would love to stay and discuss this further, but gotta get to bed.

Nite all!

Anna - check your email - I sent it again.  :D


Title: Lively Case Discussion #522 9/10 - 9/12/2006
Post by: Anna on September 11, 2006, 01:02:35 AM
.
Now I remember it as SCroes claimed he heard that and even Sleuth saying how unlikely he could see or hear anything there as he claimed from his vantage aboard the Tattoo.

Klaas, do you remember or not?  I wonder where Sleuth is for I am sure she would recall saying that.  I don't remember a maid seeing it but remember one witnessing the loading of the contents of a room at HI and taking to the dump.  Odd since they have their own at the hotels, incinerators too.  Incinerators, hum. . ..

Sunfreak, you may be right on the maid instead of croes as my brain is sort of fried right now with too much info and other stuff so will have to get confirmation if possible.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #522 9/10 - 9/12/2006
Post by: crazybabyborg on September 11, 2006, 01:04:01 AM
I want to catch the 911 coverage on CNN Pipeline beginning at 8:30am. They are carrying a replay of the day in real time as it happened from 8:30 - midnight. So.......I'm going to turn in. Have a nice nite, monkeys!


Title: Lively Case Discussion #522 9/10 - 9/12/2006
Post by: klaasend on September 11, 2006, 01:05:12 AM
Quote from: "Anna"
.
Now I remember it as SCroes claimed he heard that and even Sleuth saying how unlikely he could see or hear anything there as he claimed from his vantage aboard the Tattoo.

Klaas, do you remember or not?  I wonder where Sleuth is for I am sure she would recall saying that.  I don't remember a maid seeing it but remember one witnessing the loading of the contents of a room at HI and taking to the dump.  Odd since they have their own at the hotels, incinerators too.  Incinerators, hum. . ..

Sunfreak, you may be right on the maid instead of croes as my brain is sort of fried right now with too much info and other stuff so will have to get confirmation if possible.

I remember the story but I don't remember if it came from S Croes.  I'll see if I can dig anything up on it.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #522 9/10 - 9/12/2006
Post by: Anna on September 11, 2006, 01:07:07 AM
.
Goodnight Sunfreak2 and Crazybabyborg,

I am going soon, too, and will try to watch the CNN special in the morning if it is not too upsetting.   :(

Am really tired and so having a hard time really concentrating on the ramifications of these new statements but tomorrow is another day.. . .

.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #522 9/10 - 9/12/2006
Post by: Kat_Gram on September 11, 2006, 01:07:40 AM
The name of one of the guards came from the Holiday Inn staff.
And now , without going way back, to almost the very start, I can't remember which alibi was which.
a.) He was at the Soul Fest with his wife. His whereabouts was accounted for all evening.
b.) The other one was at the Holiday Inn that night "visiting " but left at midnight. His Mum was unsure of what time he came home, as he was a grown man and she didn't monitor his comings and goings.
That info was on CNN right at the beginning and it came from their lawyers who were on CNN. ( Must have been N. Grace, because that was the channel I was following this one ) .
These two had worked at the Allego and one got dragged in because he knew the other from there.
There are CNN transcripts available from the early days.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #522 9/10 - 9/12/2006
Post by: thirdstrike on September 11, 2006, 01:12:01 AM
Hello everyone!!  Hope all had a good weekend...


Title: Lively Case Discussion #522 9/10 - 9/12/2006
Post by: memphis on September 11, 2006, 01:12:13 AM
Quote from: "klaasend"
Quote from: "sb"
I agree w/ Hammer that PVDS may have set them up THAT way.

What I am trying to derive is the methodology whereby the K2 decided to tell a story of 2 SG's that didn't exist. We KNOW the HI scenario is fiction with-or without- the 2 guys anyway. What prompted them to fit the 2 guys in there? Either:

1. Paulus told them to say it, or

2. They came up with the idea as an embellishment of what Paulus told them to say.

All right, in the K2's shoes for a second (ugh)... Paulus is the Master of All Things, the Benefactor, the Hope of exoneration, the Big Wheel who will get them OFF THE HOOK. He gives them a story. What would you do with the story if in their spot?

In their spot, they hew to the Party Line, CHAPTER, VERSE, VERBATIM, down to the last jot and tittle. NO editorializing, NO embellishments. Stick to the script, boys, and all will be well.

Besides, I don't think either of them is smart enough to think up an additional detail like that.

I believe for some esoteric reason, Paulus included the SG sequence as part of the cover story. Now why?

1.  Because Joran leaving an obviously drunk girl to fend for herself would seem better if Joran left her in the hands of a security guard?

2.  Because PVDS knew that some of the SG's sold drugs to the tourists and would be easy targets?

3.  Paulus didn't expect Beth, Jug and Dave to show up and ruin his plans otherwise the SG and HI story would have worked?


I pick door number 3.   :wink:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #522 9/10 - 9/12/2006
Post by: the big hammer on September 11, 2006, 01:17:03 AM
"Betty" on FP

klaas --

Wasn't deepak's e-mail, originally posted by poster WonderWoman, addressed to "Betty"?  To Chicago, I thought.

This "Betty" is posting under the deepak witness statement thread on FP.

.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #522 9/10 - 9/12/2006
Post by: klaasend on September 11, 2006, 01:25:08 AM
Quote from: "the big hammer"
"Betty" on FP

klaas --

Wasn't deepak's e-mail, originally posted by poster WonderWoman, addressed to "Betty"?  To Chicago, I thought.

This "Betty" is posting under the deepak witness statement thread on FP.

.

Yep, and that's who I think she is.  The Deepak alibi email was addressed to a woman by the name of Betty.  According to WW Betty befriended Deepak at the Cyberzone, just as THIS Betty did.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #522 9/10 - 9/12/2006
Post by: klaasend on September 11, 2006, 01:31:37 AM
Betty posted on FP as early as June 17, 2005:
I believe that Natalie is still alive and hiding somewhere on the island. I pray this is true for the respect of her parents and the three young men that they are holding.
I happen to know the driver of the car, and he would not hurt a fly.
I wish all of you would have more positive thoughts, and do alot more praying instead of slinging mud at everone..Maybe she don’t want to be found! Or she has gone to another island. It’s food for thought.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #522 9/10 - 9/12/2006
Post by: Anna on September 11, 2006, 01:47:11 AM
.
Has Betty admitted being the one to whom the original Deepak email/game plan was sent?  I see someone has posted and asked her just that so we will see what she says.  I thought the email Betty was supposed to be a very elderly lady something like 72 years old that WW elaborated on.

Anyone else remember that age?  Well, that email has now been refuted even by Deepak so I don't see why she says he is a gentleman and all the rest when it is so obvious he is a stone cold liar from her email.

.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #522 9/10 - 9/12/2006
Post by: Anna on September 11, 2006, 01:50:50 AM
.
After all the time I have spent on this tragedy, it just today dawned on me that Joran says DEEPAK said there was a security guard.  I thought Joran claimed to have seen him and probably closer than the other two since he actually got out of the car.

Anyone know from memory, assuming anyone is still here, if Joran says ANYWHERE that he also saw this security guard?

This is a new spin to me.  I must have missed that important point along the way.

.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #522 9/10 - 9/12/2006
Post by: thirdstrike on September 11, 2006, 01:52:34 AM
Quote from: "Anna"
.
Has Betty admitted being the one to whom the original Deepak email/game plan was sent?  I see someone has posted and asked her just that so we will see what she says.  I thought the email Betty was supposed to be a very elderly lady something like 72 years old that WW elaborated on.

Anyone else remember that age?  Well, that email has now been refuted even by Deepak so I don't see why she says he is a gentleman and all the rest when it is so obvious he is a stone cold liar from her email.

.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #522 9/10 - 9/12/2006
Post by: klaasend on September 11, 2006, 01:53:03 AM
Quote from: "Anna"
.
After all the time I have spent on this tragedy, it just today dawned on me that Joran says DEEPAK said there was a security guard.  I thought Joran claimed to have seen him and probably closer than the other two since he actually got out of the car.

Anyone know from memory, assuming anyone is still here, if Joran says ANYWHERE that he also saw this security guard?

This is a new spin to me.  I must have missed that important point along the way.

.

Plus Joran said that it was Deepak that made up the SG story on the way to the VDS home when Beth and the gang arrived and went to the home looking for him, remember?  So, Joran is completely placing the blame of the SG guard story on Deepak.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #522 9/10 - 9/12/2006
Post by: thirdstrike on September 11, 2006, 01:53:53 AM
Quote from: "Anna"
.
Has Betty admitted being the one to whom the original Deepak email/game plan was sent?  I see someone has posted and asked her just that so we will see what she says.  I thought the email Betty was supposed to be a very elderly lady something like 72 years old that WW elaborated on.

Anyone else remember that age?  Well, that email has now been refuted even by Deepak so I don't see why she says he is a gentleman and all the rest when it is so obvious he is a stone cold liar from her email.

.


I did actually mean to post something...

I do remember WW talking about this woman "Betty".  She stated she was, in fact, an elderly woman, although I don't exactly remember her age...

Just letting you know what I remembered...


Title: Lively Case Discussion #522 9/10 - 9/12/2006
Post by: Anna on September 11, 2006, 01:57:33 AM
Quote from: "klaasend"
[
.

Plus Joran said that it was Deepak that made up the SG story on the way to the VDS home when Beth and the gang arrived and went to the home looking for him, remember?  So, Joran is completely placing the blame of the SG guard story on Deepak.[/quote]

Klaas,
That part I got but the fact that Joran did not physically SEE the SG I must have just totally missed some how.  That blows my mind, too.  Doesn't take much some days,  :?

ThirdStrike,
Thanks, yes she did seem to discuss this Betty and email excessively and I think now we know why.   :?

.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #522 9/10 - 9/12/2006
Post by: Hotshot on September 11, 2006, 01:59:08 AM
Hi guys, couldn't sleep so I thought I would go look at some sites.  I came across this.  Gottenbos house for sale, its the 3rd one down.  Look at the price!!!  I honestly don't think they want to sell it, just put it up to make things look like that.

http://www.arubarealestate.com/search/real.mv?next


Title: Lively Case Discussion #522 9/10 - 9/12/2006
Post by: thirdstrike on September 11, 2006, 02:00:51 AM
Quote from: "Anna"


ThirdStrike,
Thanks, yes she did seem to discuss this Betty and email excessively and I think now we know why.   :?

.


Actually Anna, I may be the only one that don't know why here... :oops:

I've been pretty busy this weekend, and haven't been able to cacth up.  What are you guys referring to here?  Any info you could provide would be appreciated...


Title: Lively Case Discussion #522 9/10 - 9/12/2006
Post by: Anna on September 11, 2006, 02:04:42 AM
.
HotShot,
I can't gauge the price of the houses because the market is so much higher than in my area but I see some that seem just as expensive so not sure if theirs is out of line or not.  Maybe if they are not really planning to sell it, they plan to return at some point in time?  So I wonder why they would be in the US if that rumor is true?  And temporarily at that?  Odd.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #522 9/10 - 9/12/2006
Post by: Anna on September 11, 2006, 02:08:46 AM
.
Third,
Klaas has reason to suspect that WW posted under a variety of nics and may personally be responsible for starting some of the early rumors.  Not sure if this Betty is one of them or not but seems she claimed quite a few things as facts very early on that were not and they became part of the internet lore and came to be taken as almost facts.  Like FBI reports of Natalee running away in Costa Rica when I think her parents said she had never been there or certainly did not run away ever.

This Betty on the front page sings much that song about Natalee being somewhere in hiding.

.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #522 9/10 - 9/12/2006
Post by: Anna on September 11, 2006, 02:11:51 AM
.

My eyes are closing so will call if a day and head for the Monkey Bunkey.  I do hope there are more statements for we have a very odd picture from these last two of a frame up of Kelpoes with their being the only ones to see the SG.  

Every little tiny piece of the puzzle is one more step toward finding out the truth of what happened to Natalee.  

Goodnight. . . will read tomorrow any additional comments.


.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #522 9/10 - 9/12/2006
Post by: igsigs on September 11, 2006, 02:11:53 AM
Could Betty be WWs mom?  Or WW?


Title: Lively Case Discussion #522 9/10 - 9/12/2006
Post by: thirdstrike on September 11, 2006, 02:14:53 AM
Quote from: "Anna"
.
Third,
Klaas has reason to suspect that WW posted under a variety of nics and may personally be responsible for starting some of the early rumors.  Not sure if this Betty is one of them or not but seems she claimed quite a few things as facts very early on that were not and they became part of the internet lore and came to be taken as almost facts.  Like FBI reports of Natalee running away in Costa Rica when I think her parents said she had never been there or certainly did not run away ever.

This Betty on the front page sings much that song about Natalee being somewhere in hiding.

.


Yeah, I now remember some of the WW revelations of late...especially the one where she may have been the originator of the Costa Rican runaway rumor.  And, I do very much remember the early posts of defense of (mainly) Deepak, as she was doing so under the blanket of their alleged "mutual friend" now known as "Betty".  What was most disappointing to me was that I considered WW a "friend" of mine on these boards.  We often quarelled...mostly because of her defending the K2's (again, mainyl Deepak).  But, we emailed each other on a regular basis...mostly to say "Hello" and talk about things outside of this case (small talk mainly).  Funny how things evolve, eh  :roll:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #522 9/10 - 9/12/2006
Post by: klaasend on September 11, 2006, 02:15:50 AM
Quote from: "Anna"
.
Third,
Klaas has reason to suspect that WW posted under a variety of nics and may personally be responsible for starting some of the early rumors.  Not sure if this Betty is one of them or not but seems she claimed quite a few things as facts very early on that were not and they became part of the internet lore and came to be taken as almost facts.  Like FBI reports of Natalee running away in Costa Rica when I think her parents said she had never been there or certainly did not run away ever.

This Betty on the front page sings much that song about Natalee being somewhere in hiding.

.


Anna - the writing style of Betty doesn't look the same as WW.  I think it is the Betty who Deepak sent that email to and that Betty is not WW.  WW did post under other nicknames and she was the one who started the runaway rumor.

With that it's time for me to call it a night.  See you all tomorrow.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #522 9/10 - 9/12/2006
Post by: Hotshot on September 11, 2006, 02:17:12 AM
Quote from: "Anna"
.
HotShot,
I can't gauge the price of the houses because the market is so much higher than in my area but I see some that seem just as expensive so not sure if theirs is out of line or not.  Maybe if they are not really planning to sell it, they plan to return at some point in time?  So I wonder why they would be in the US if that rumor is true?  And temporarily at that?  Odd.


Let me help out.  there were 15 pages of houses, and they went from low to high, theirs was on the last page..


Title: Lively Case Discussion #522 9/10 - 9/12/2006
Post by: thirdstrike on September 11, 2006, 02:18:57 AM
Quote from: "Hotshot"
Quote from: "Anna"
.
HotShot,
I can't gauge the price of the houses because the market is so much higher than in my area but I see some that seem just as expensive so not sure if theirs is out of line or not.  Maybe if they are not really planning to sell it, they plan to return at some point in time?  So I wonder why they would be in the US if that rumor is true?  And temporarily at that?  Odd.


Let me help out.  there were 15 pages of houses, and they went from low to high, theirs was on the last page..


Hello Hotshot!!  Long time, no write...;)


Title: Lively Case Discussion #522 9/10 - 9/12/2006
Post by: Hotshot on September 11, 2006, 02:29:48 AM
Hey third how ya doing?


Title: Lively Case Discussion #522 9/10 - 9/12/2006
Post by: thirdstrike on September 11, 2006, 02:31:59 AM
Quote from: "Hotshot"
Hey third how ya doing?


Doin' ok. Wish this thing would get resolved though... :roll:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #522 9/10 - 9/12/2006
Post by: Hotshot on September 11, 2006, 02:35:04 AM
Quote from: "thirdstrike"
Quote from: "Hotshot"
Hey third how ya doing?


Doin' ok. Wish this thing would get resolved though... :roll:

I hear you there.  I am kind of waiting for the dutch to get there, and maybe make a difference.  You never know what they may come up with.  Lets get the show on the road already.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #522 9/10 - 9/12/2006
Post by: thirdstrike on September 11, 2006, 02:41:16 AM
Quote from: "Hotshot"
Quote from: "thirdstrike"
Quote from: "Hotshot"
Hey third how ya doing?


Doin' ok. Wish this thing would get resolved though... :roll:

I hear you there.  I am kind of waiting for the dutch to get there, and maybe make a difference.  You never know what they may come up with.  Lets get the show on the road already.


Yup!!  Bring in the Dutch...English...Hell, bring in a few Iraqis if it'll make a difference!  Just get the thing done already...DAMN!!  This family's been waiting long enough...


Title: Lively Case Discussion #522 9/10 - 9/12/2006
Post by: Hotshot on September 11, 2006, 02:57:54 AM
You got it!!  Well I think I am going to try to get to sleep now.  will see you tomorrow.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #522 9/10 - 9/12/2006
Post by: darleenofalabama on September 11, 2006, 03:01:29 AM
HELLO, YA'LL!!!!!!!!!!!  I've just read the last few posts here, and I've something to contribute:  I doubt that Wonderwoman is a real Republican.  I don't know where she is, but she probably isn't really out fund-raising for the Republican Party.  :D   I did not see her in Europe, either.   :D  (Which doesn't mean she wasn't there.)

I'll see ya'll the next time I have anything to contribute.   :lol:   Wishing everyone well!


Title: Lively Case Discussion #522 9/10 - 9/12/2006
Post by: darleenofalabama on September 11, 2006, 03:08:57 AM
And, where the hell is my tiara?!!  HA HA HA, Klaasend; just testing to see if any cussing, other than Southern cussing, is allowed around here.  But, seriously, somebody get security in case I have to pry it off nonesasha's head. :D


Title: Lively Case Discussion #522 9/10 - 9/12/2006
Post by: LilPuma on September 11, 2006, 05:08:51 AM
Anna, I've always liked you're sig quote, but now that you've added the cutest little Bijon (sp?), I couldn't help but tell you.


Title: Good Morning all
Post by: Leslie on September 11, 2006, 06:22:25 AM
Diario
http://www.diarioaruba.com/
Amigoe
http://www.amigoe.com/english/
BonDia
http://www.cspnv.com/
Solo di Pueblo
http://www.solodipueblo.com/
Translator:
http://papiamentu.donamaro.nl

GMA message board.
http://forums.go.com/abcnews/GMA/forum?start=0&forumID=7


Title: Happy Birthday IBE!
Post by: Leslie on September 11, 2006, 06:25:57 AM
HAPPY BIRTHDAY
                                              IBE


                     Hope you have a great birthday


Title: Lively Case Discussion #522 9/10 - 9/12/2006
Post by: msmarple on September 11, 2006, 06:47:20 AM
Quote from: "darleenofalabama"
HELLO, YA'LL!!!!!!!!!!!  I've just read the last few posts here, and I've something to contribute:  I doubt that Wonderwoman is a real Republican.  I don't know where she is, but she probably isn't really out fund-raising for the Republican Party.  :D   I did not see her in Europe, either.   :D  (Which doesn't mean she wasn't there.)

I'll see ya'll the next time I have anything to contribute.   :lol:   Wishing everyone well!


{{{ Darleen }}} And WW doesn't even know how to spell Darleen  :lol:

We were just talking about you this weekend. There's a whole passel of stuff you need to read. Statements made by J2K and others (although not all of the statements are included - yet). Klaas has been translating from Dutch for us; has practically learned to speak the language.
 

And then there's the Murder & Crime in Aruba thread (see my sig line). It's a must read. You might can help us figure out what to do with this.

And - How was your trip? I am pea green with envy ...

Avatars - There's something different about how to post them now, and I'm sorry I don't recall the instruction.


Title: Re: Good Morning all
Post by: Hotshot on September 11, 2006, 07:46:51 AM
Quote from: "Leslie"
Diario
http://www.diarioaruba.com/
Amigoe
http://www.amigoe.com/english/
BonDia
http://www.cspnv.com/
Solo di Pueblo
http://www.solodipueblo.com/
Translator:
http://papiamentu.donamaro.nl

GMA message board.
http://forums.go.com/abcnews/GMA/forum?start=0&forumID=7


Ohhhh Ohhhh  another overdose, but thats all I can tell.
(http://i67.photobucket.com/albums/h294/gummy_2006/overdose.jpg)


Title: Lively Case Discussion #522 9/10 - 9/12/2006
Post by: crazybabyborg on September 11, 2006, 08:00:34 AM
Good morning!

Just a reminder for anyone interested: CNN pipeline is replaying coverage of 911 in real time as it happened 5 years ago. It's free today from 8:30am - midnight. You can access it through the link on cnn.com.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #522 9/10 - 9/12/2006
Post by: sharon on September 11, 2006, 08:25:02 AM
Interesting.....curious....what's the truth about this man?

http://www.amigoe.com/english/

Chief of police Bonaire pleads for point of support coastguard

BONAIRE – Chief of police in Bonaire, Jan van der Straten, pleads for a point of support of the coastguard in Bonaire, same as the case in Curacao, Aruba, and St. Maarten.  He says that he has sufficient indications that the island is becoming an alternative for the import and export of drugs.

He didn’t want to say what the alternatives are, because he didn’t want to help the underworld to get more ideas.  “But I observe that there are a lot of drugs on the island.”  Van der Straten travels to the Netherlands next week to talk to the department of Home Affairs.  He expects to also talk about his plea for a coastguard support point on the island.  

When minister Johan Remkes (Home Affairs, VVD) visited the island last week, Van der Straten didn’t get a chance to mention this to him.  He considers a point of support with fast boats that can chase the go-fasts with drugs, firearms, and illegal persons to be essential.  “We cannot be emphasizing on just the controls at the airport, when we do not have sufficient control on other points of entrance of the drugs.”

A radar is going to be installed in Bonaire that can follow all suspicious movements, so a point of support is actually indispensable and possible, even though this depends on whether financing was arranged for this.  “But the minister himself has agreed to expand the border patrol.”

Van der Straten is of the opinion that the civil servants that are currently in charge of controlling the criminality and the borders must get more authority, because these are too limited now.  He didn’t want to say what these limitations are.  All he had to say was that “it is too bureaucratic.”


Title: Lively Case Discussion #522 9/10 - 9/12/2006
Post by: MissinNat on September 11, 2006, 08:37:15 AM
Quote from: "Hotshot"
Hi guys, couldn't sleep so I thought I would go look at some sites.  I came across this.  Gottenbos house for sale, its the 3rd one down.  Look at the price!!!  I honestly don't think they want to sell it, just put it up to make things look like that.

http://www.arubarealestate.com/search/real.mv?next


It won't let us go to this site.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #522 9/10 - 9/12/2006
Post by: Jacqueline on September 11, 2006, 08:59:56 AM
Quote from: "MissinNat"
Quote from: "Hotshot"
Hi guys, couldn't sleep so I thought I would go look at some sites.  I came across this.  Gottenbos house for sale, its the 3rd one down.  Look at the price!!!  I honestly don't think they want to sell it, just put it up to make things look like that.

http://www.arubarealestate.com/search/real.mv?next


It won't let us go to this site.


I got in...Initially you get a message saying you are not allowed access but if you hit main page link then houses you can get in....


Title: Lively Case Discussion #522 9/10 - 9/12/2006
Post by: Kimmy53 on September 11, 2006, 09:25:56 AM
Good morning monkeys.  Good to see you all this a.m.

This is a sad day.  My prayers for all on this anniversary.  Everyone was affected in some way.  WE WILL NEVER FORGET


Title: Lively Case Discussion #522 9/10 - 9/12/2006
Post by: MissinNat on September 11, 2006, 10:04:42 AM
Quote from: "Jacqueline"
Quote from: "MissinNat"
Quote from: "Hotshot"
Hi guys, couldn't sleep so I thought I would go look at some sites.  I came across this.  Gottenbos house for sale, its the 3rd one down.  Look at the price!!!  I honestly don't think they want to sell it, just put it up to make things look like that.

http://www.arubarealestate.com/search/real.mv?next


It won't let us go to this site.


I got in...Initially you get a message saying you are not allowed access but if you hit main page link then houses you can get in....


Hi Jac,

I did get to the site I just wasn't sure which house was the Gottenbos or how much it was selling for.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #522 9/10 - 9/12/2006
Post by: mrs. red on September 11, 2006, 10:06:16 AM
Good morning Monkeys...

yes, it is a very sad day.... I hope we don't forget just how horrible that day was... and that it strengthens the resolved to win the war against terrorism...


Title: Lively Case Discussion #522 9/10 - 9/12/2006
Post by: MissinNat on September 11, 2006, 10:20:10 AM
Quote from: "mrs. red"
Good morning Monkeys...

yes, it is a very sad day.... I hope we don't forget just how horrible that day was... and that it strengthens the resolved to win the war against terrorism...


Mrs Red,

We will never forget!  Just like we also will never forget Natalee and her family.

Missin Nat


Title: Lively Case Discussion #522 9/10 - 9/12/2006
Post by: 2NJSons_Mom on September 11, 2006, 10:36:27 AM
Good morning, all.  We were away for a few days at the shore, and I have some reading to catch up on here.  

Always remembering those lost on this date, several from our town and surrounding neighborhoods, as well as Natalee, who brought us together here.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #522 9/10 - 9/12/2006
Post by: snoopy on September 11, 2006, 10:50:55 AM
Good Morning Everybody!!   :D

Happy Birthday IBE.  Today is also my sons 17th Birthday.

God Bless Everyone who lost loved ones and friends on this sad day that war was declared on this great Nation.  

God Bless America.  

God Bless the men and women who stand on the wall everyday for our freedom and to keep us safe.  Soldiers, Firefighters, all law enforcement officials, the men/women who hold elected offices, and our Allies.  The everyday citizen like you and I who keep our nose to the grindstone and keep watch over our neighbors.

We must not waiver.  We must not fail.

God Bless us all.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #522 9/10 - 9/12/2006
Post by: Jacqueline on September 11, 2006, 11:19:20 AM
Quote from: "mrs. red"
Good morning Monkeys...

yes, it is a very sad day.... I hope we don't forget just how horrible that day was... and that it strengthens the resolved to win the war against terrorism...


We will never forget...

God Bless the USA


Title: Lively Case Discussion #522 9/10 - 9/12/2006
Post by: klaasend on September 11, 2006, 11:29:18 AM
GOODMORNING ALL!


Glenda is posting at RU some hate mail she is implying SHE received today.  She is also posting the headers of those emails.  In one of the emails she neglected to remove who the email was addressed to:

(http://i14.photobucket.com/albums/a306/klaasend/glendahatemail2.jpg)

So, does GLENDA/BONDIA/JULIA work for ATA?  Guess that answers alot of questions!  :wink:

By the way, these types of emails serve absolutely no purpose. I'm sure if they are traceable, the sender will be located.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #522 9/10 - 9/12/2006
Post by: Nut44x4 on September 11, 2006, 11:47:06 AM
Quote from: "klaasend"
GOODMORNING ALL!


Glenda is posting at RU some hate mail she is implying SHE received today.  She is also posting the headers of those emails.  In one of the emails she neglected to remove who the email was addressed to:

(http://i14.photobucket.com/albums/a306/klaasend/glendahatemail2.jpg)

So, does GLENDA/BONDIA/JULIA work for ATA?  Guess that answers alot of questions!  :wink:


By the way, these types of emails serve absolutely no purpose. I'm sure if they are traceable, the sender will be located.

I CAUGHT THAT...I was watching this morning. Veddddddyyyyyy intedessssssting, indeed.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #522 9/10 - 9/12/2006
Post by: Nut44x4 on September 11, 2006, 11:48:15 AM
:shock:  weird....my post got caught up into another...SORRY ALL.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #522 9/10 - 9/12/2006
Post by: klaasend on September 11, 2006, 11:49:08 AM
Quote from: "Nut44x4"
:shock:  weird....my post got caught up into another...SORRY ALL.

I fixed it  :wink:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #522 9/10 - 9/12/2006
Post by: Nut44x4 on September 11, 2006, 11:52:16 AM
Quote from: "klaasend"
Quote from: "Nut44x4"
:shock:  weird....my post got caught up into another...SORRY ALL.

I fixed it  :wink:



Cool....thanks  :wink: jeeeezeeeeeee.....lol


Title: Lively Case Discussion #522 9/10 - 9/12/2006
Post by: San on September 11, 2006, 11:53:00 AM
Quote from: "klaasend"
GOODMORNING ALL!


Glenda is posting at RU some hate mail she is implying SHE received today.  She is also posting the headers of those emails.  In one of the emails she neglected to remove who the email was addressed to:

(http://i14.photobucket.com/albums/a306/klaasend/glendahatemail2.jpg)

So, does GLENDA/BONDIA/JULIA work for ATA?  Guess that answers alot of questions!  :wink:

By the way, these types of emails serve absolutely no purpose. I'm sure if they are traceable, the sender will be located.

This woman is an idiot.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #522 9/10 - 9/12/2006
Post by: nonesuche on September 11, 2006, 12:01:06 PM
Hey Klaas-

Wanna share the content of the email?  :wink:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #522 9/10 - 9/12/2006
Post by: klaasend on September 11, 2006, 12:04:27 PM
Quote from: "nonesuche"
Hey Klaas-

Wanna share the content of the email?  :wink:

Not really, it's pretty rough, definately not PG-13 :wink:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #522 9/10 - 9/12/2006
Post by: nonesuche on September 11, 2006, 12:07:22 PM
oh shoot!

I don't read there, fear the cooties attacking me  :lol:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #522 9/10 - 9/12/2006
Post by: klaasend on September 11, 2006, 12:08:38 PM
Quote from: "nonesuche"
oh shoot!

I don't read there, fear the cooties attacking me  :lol:

I'll email you  :lol:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #522 9/10 - 9/12/2006
Post by: mrs. red on September 11, 2006, 12:09:34 PM
Quote from: "nonesuche"
oh shoot!

I don't read there, fear the cooties attacking me  :lol:


Me either, not only that but I don't really care what lies they wish to spread today....  :lol:

I appreciate those who can... but I am just too squemish.... (sp??)


Title: Lively Case Discussion #522 9/10 - 9/12/2006
Post by: snoopy on September 11, 2006, 12:12:57 PM
O/T

If I click on the Amazon site on the front page to order something, will SM get credit?

Glenda Glenda Glenda.......so HER email was addressed to ata huh?  Will wonders ever cease?  ppppfftttt don't get me started on dat woman.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #522 9/10 - 9/12/2006
Post by: thirdstrike on September 11, 2006, 12:13:09 PM
Hello everyone!!  I hope everyone's hanging in there on such a difficult day for not just Americans, but to all mankind...

Much love and respect to you all!!

Just wanted to stop in to check on family.  What's the word?


Title: Lively Case Discussion #522 9/10 - 9/12/2006
Post by: Nut44x4 on September 11, 2006, 12:13:23 PM
Quote from: "klaasend"
Quote from: "nonesuche"
Hey Klaas-

Wanna share the content of the email?  :wink:

Not really, it's pretty rough, definately not PG-13 :wink:


It is nasty.....better off not seeing it.
(http://bestsmileys.com/scared/8.gif)


Title: Lively Case Discussion #522 9/10 - 9/12/2006
Post by: thirdstrike on September 11, 2006, 12:19:17 PM
Listen, I have a question for those of you who seems to be the most knowledgable about this case.  And, that is...realistcally...is the investigation dead?  Are we to have any faith in Dutch to resolve it?  Or is this simply another case of "smoke & mirrors"??


Title: Lively Case Discussion #522 9/10 - 9/12/2006
Post by: snoopy on September 11, 2006, 12:19:23 PM
O/T

I forgot to tell ya'll.  I had a wonderful afternoon Saturday!!  Finally got to meet SunnyinTX and Lisa.  Really cool ladies!


Title: Lively Case Discussion #522 9/10 - 9/12/2006
Post by: thirdstrike on September 11, 2006, 12:21:07 PM
Quote from: "snoopy"
O/T

I forgot to tell ya'll.  I had a wonderful afternoon Saturday!!  Finally got to meet SunnyinTX and Lisa.  Really cool ladies!


Good for you Snoop!  Was that your first time meeting someone in here?  I've yet to, but I've often wondered who has...

Anyone else?


Title: Lively Case Discussion #522 9/10 - 9/12/2006
Post by: mrs. red on September 11, 2006, 12:23:19 PM
Quote from: "snoopy"
O/T

If I click on the Amazon site on the front page to order something, will SM get credit?

Glenda Glenda Glenda.......so HER email was addressed to ata huh?  Will wonders ever cease?  ppppfftttt don't get me started on dat woman.


Yes Snoopy, thank you for asking that!   I just got an email that my Larry garrison book will be arriving anyday now....


Title: Lively Case Discussion #522 9/10 - 9/12/2006
Post by: San on September 11, 2006, 12:24:27 PM
Per Glenda:

"September 11th -- what an odd day to send hatemail to Aruba"

Like that traitor really cares what day it is in America.

Did she care about the other days that Aruba ruled in favor of the murdering rapists like the Van der Sloots and Kalpoes.

Message to Julia don't worry about what day it is here in America we don't need your sympathy.  Make sure you stay on that POS island and celebrate with the rapists, murderers and druggies that you are so happy to defend.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #522 9/10 - 9/12/2006
Post by: mrs. red on September 11, 2006, 12:24:58 PM
Quote from: thirdstrike
Quote from: "snoopy"
O/T

I forgot to tell ya'll.  I had a wonderful afternoon Saturday!!  Finally got to meet SunnyinTX and Lisa.  Really cool ladies!


Good for you Snoop!  Was that your first time meeting someone in here?  I've yet to, but I've often wondered who has...

Anyone else?[/quote

I know that Flying Mermaid and Slueth met up....


Title: Lively Case Discussion #522 9/10 - 9/12/2006
Post by: mrs. red on September 11, 2006, 12:25:39 PM
Quote from: "San"
Per Glenda:

"September 11th -- what an odd day to send hatemail to Aruba"

Like that traitor really cares what day it is in America.

Did she care about the other days that Aruba ruled in favor of the murdering rapists like the Van der Sloots and Kalpoes.

Message to Julia don't worry about what day it is here in America we don't need your sympathy.  Make sure you stay on that POS island and celebrate with the rapists, murderers and druggies that you are so happy to defend.


Yep, San that just about says it all.....


Title: Lively Case Discussion #522 9/10 - 9/12/2006
Post by: blah on September 11, 2006, 12:26:31 PM
Quote from: "San"
Quote from: "klaasend"
GOODMORNING ALL!


Glenda is posting at RU some hate mail she is implying SHE received today.  She is also posting the headers of those emails.  In one of the emails she neglected to remove who the email was addressed to:

(http://i14.photobucket.com/albums/a306/klaasend/glendahatemail2.jpg)

So, does GLENDA/BONDIA/JULIA work for ATA?  Guess that answers alot of questions!  :wink:

By the way, these types of emails serve absolutely no purpose. I'm sure if they are traceable, the sender will be located.

This woman is an idiot.


and that is giving her alot of credit !


Title: Lively Case Discussion #522 9/10 - 9/12/2006
Post by: snoopy on September 11, 2006, 12:27:40 PM
Quote from: "thirdstrike"
Quote from: "snoopy"
O/T

I forgot to tell ya'll.  I had a wonderful afternoon Saturday!!  Finally got to meet SunnyinTX and Lisa.  Really cool ladies!


Good for you Snoop!  Was that your first time meeting someone in here?  I've yet to, but I've often wondered who has...

Anyone else?


Yep!!  They both are very funny outgoing people.  Sunny is exactly the same person here as she is in person.  Too cool!!

Lisa is great too!!

Those 2 could prolly get into some trouble together!!   :lol:
Of course I'm the quiet shy one. 8)


Title: Lively Case Discussion #522 9/10 - 9/12/2006
Post by: BTgirl on September 11, 2006, 12:27:57 PM
Quote from: "snoopy"
O/T

I forgot to tell ya'll.  I had a wonderful afternoon Saturday!!  Finally got to meet SunnyinTX and Lisa.  Really cool ladies!


I'm hoping you get to meet me soon too Snoop!  :D


Title: Lively Case Discussion #522 9/10 - 9/12/2006
Post by: snoopy on September 11, 2006, 12:28:18 PM
Quote from: "mrs. red"
Quote from: "snoopy"
O/T

If I click on the Amazon site on the front page to order something, will SM get credit?

Glenda Glenda Glenda.......so HER email was addressed to ata huh?  Will wonders ever cease?  ppppfftttt don't get me started on dat woman.


Yes Snoopy, thank you for asking that!   I just got an email that my Larry garrison book will be arriving anyday now....


Thank you mrs.  I need to go order Quickbooks Pro now.  TTYL


Title: Lively Case Discussion #522 9/10 - 9/12/2006
Post by: Angiex911dsptchr on September 11, 2006, 12:29:58 PM
Hi everyone.. Sad day today is indeed. Klass I have managed to mess up the 911 thread. Maybe you can delete some of my posts..LOL  :)
  I have been working alot and reading up when I can.  THANKS!!!


Title: Lively Case Discussion #522 9/10 - 9/12/2006
Post by: snoopy on September 11, 2006, 12:30:00 PM
Quote from: "BTgirl"
Quote from: "snoopy"
O/T

I forgot to tell ya'll.  I had a wonderful afternoon Saturday!!  Finally got to meet SunnyinTX and Lisa.  Really cool ladies!


I'm hoping you get to meet me soon too Snoop!  :D


When is it that you are coming to St. Louis?  I forgot :oops:

That will be great!!


Title: Lively Case Discussion #522 9/10 - 9/12/2006
Post by: thirdstrike on September 11, 2006, 12:30:01 PM
Quote from: mrs. red
Quote from: "thirdstrike"
Quote from: "snoopy"
O/T

I forgot to tell ya'll.  I had a wonderful afternoon Saturday!!  Finally got to meet SunnyinTX and Lisa.  Really cool ladies!


Good for you Snoop!  Was that your first time meeting someone in here?  I've yet to, but I've often wondered who has...

Anyone else?[/quote

I know that Flying Mermaid and Slueth met up....


Hey Scarlett!!  I've missed you lately...;)

So, there are others, eh?  Not sure how I'd feel about actually meeting someone.  As much as I'd want to, there's always a slight danger in doing so.  Maybe I'm just paranoid.  Of course, that "paranoia" wouldn't apply to you...;)

How you doin', BTW?  Hope work isn't getting to much in the way of your "fun time" anymore...


Title: Lively Case Discussion #522 9/10 - 9/12/2006
Post by: klaasend on September 11, 2006, 12:30:36 PM
Excellent post by Mortella on the front page yesterday:

According to Deepak and Satish, absolutely nothing happened and they should have arrived back at the HI in very short order, perhaps even close to the time of the returning MB students. All this could have happened in no time at all with the island being so small.

Speaking of leading the witness, again the injection of the Fisherman’s Huts by Jacobs. Are we pretty safe in assuming that Jacobs would therefore be a part of the “professional cover-up” as he seems adamant that the huts be involved regardless of what his witnesses are saying.

Prior knowledge of the woman being accosted there makes it a desirable place to have left Natalee where there is a known predator. Did ALE not have any kind of a stakeout to look for this known predator? Were there not extra beach patrols in place to see if they could apprehend this person? Would these patrols not have seen Joran and Natalee if they were in fact on the beach that night? Why did the men fishing just off shore not see them if in fact they were there as Joran finally picked up his cue to say?

Jacobs might as well say, “Are you sure you didn’t leave her at the fisherman’s huts because you know there is a prior incident of a woman being accosted there so you could blame the person who accosted her?” Oops! We don’t know if he said that or not and we certainly don’t know if he or Paulus best friend van der Straaten told that to Paulus but I would have to think that he did with that later becoming the preferred version by prime suspect Joran.

It certainly helps to have friends in high places to let you know where the best alibi can be found and to lead you in making statements and revisions to the story.

So what was Joran doing for the next two hours, Satish? And did he really have a computer complete with printer in his apartment and if so, what happened to it? Why did Anita insist there was only one and it was in the main residence? So many details to create when manufacturing a story from out of thin air. No way all three of you got it right the first time, huh?

What on earth is in this for you and your brother to lie for Joran like this? He will pin the entire thing on you two in a heartbeat. Better tell the truth and put the blame where it belongs before it is too late and you and Deepak end up taking the fall for the Dutchie.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #522 9/10 - 9/12/2006
Post by: 2NJSons_Mom on September 11, 2006, 12:31:14 PM
Klaasend, do you think Glenda is one of the AHTA staffmembers?   Just a thought...not that it matters........


Title: Lively Case Discussion #522 9/10 - 9/12/2006
Post by: snoopy on September 11, 2006, 12:31:21 PM
Quote from: "Angiex911dsptchr"
Hi everyone.. Sad day today is indeed. Klass I have managed to mess up the 911 thread. Maybe you can delete some of my posts..LOL  :)
  I have been working alot and reading up when I can.  THANKS!!!


Hey girl!!  I been thinkin about you.  Thanks for everything you did on that day.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #522 9/10 - 9/12/2006
Post by: snoopy on September 11, 2006, 12:32:43 PM
Quote from: "San"
Per Glenda:

"September 11th -- what an odd day to send hatemail to Aruba"

Like that traitor really cares what day it is in America.

Did she care about the other days that Aruba ruled in favor of the murdering rapists like the Van der Sloots and Kalpoes.

Message to Julia don't worry about what day it is here in America we don't need your sympathy.  Make sure you stay on that POS island and celebrate with the rapists, murderers and druggies that you are so happy to defend.


Bravo San!!  Bravo!!


Title: Lively Case Discussion #522 9/10 - 9/12/2006
Post by: mrs. red on September 11, 2006, 12:33:38 PM
Quote from: thirdstrike
Quote from: "mrs. red"
Quote from: "thirdstrike"
Quote from: "snoopy"
O/T

I forgot to tell ya'll.  I had a wonderful afternoon Saturday!!  Finally got to meet SunnyinTX and Lisa.  Really cool ladies!


Good for you Snoop!  Was that your first time meeting someone in here?  I've yet to, but I've often wondered who has...

Anyone else?[/quote

I know that Flying Mermaid and Slueth met up....


Hey Scarlett!!  I've missed you lately...;)

So, there are others, eh?  Not sure how I'd feel about actually meeting someone.  As much as I'd want to, there's always a slight danger in doing so.  Maybe I'm just paranoid.  Of course, that "paranoia" wouldn't apply to you...;)

How you doin', BTW?  Hope work isn't getting to much in the way of your "fun time" anymore...


Hi ya Third!!!  

I have been working wayyyy too hard... had to run over to the Court today and it was odd thinking about the 5 years ago... today.  Listening to all the great patriotic songs, etc.

I keep missing ya though... good to see you!!


Title: Lively Case Discussion #522 9/10 - 9/12/2006
Post by: mrs. red on September 11, 2006, 12:35:14 PM
Thanks for bringing that in Klaasend, it is one of the same things I think... about the reason the beach story evolved...


Title: Lively Case Discussion #522 9/10 - 9/12/2006
Post by: klaasend on September 11, 2006, 12:37:11 PM
Quote from: "2NJSons_Mom"
Klaasend, do you think Glenda is one of the AHTA staffmembers?   Just a thought...not that it matters........

I don't know.  I actually doubt the hate mail was actually sent to Glenda as she is implying.  I think ATA probably gets alot of hate mail and they forwarded those to Glenda.  I'm sure Glenda/Julia does whatever ATA asks her to do.  :wink:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #522 9/10 - 9/12/2006
Post by: BTgirl on September 11, 2006, 12:37:45 PM
Quote from: "snoopy"
Quote from: "BTgirl"
Quote from: "snoopy"
O/T

I forgot to tell ya'll.  I had a wonderful afternoon Saturday!!  Finally got to meet SunnyinTX and Lisa.  Really cool ladies!


I'm hoping you get to meet me soon too Snoop!  :D


When is it that you are coming to St. Louis?  I forgot :oops:

That will be great!!


It will be toward the end of October.  :D


Title: Lively Case Discussion #522 9/10 - 9/12/2006
Post by: Angiex911dsptchr on September 11, 2006, 12:38:23 PM
Quote from: "snoopy"
Quote from: "Angiex911dsptchr"
Hi everyone.. Sad day today is indeed. Klass I have managed to mess up the 911 thread. Maybe you can delete some of my posts..LOL  :)
  I have been working alot and reading up when I can.  THANKS!!!


Hey girl!!  I been thinkin about you.  Thanks for everything you did on that day.


 Snoop Dawg!!  :)  I didnt do anything but pray with someonw aboard Flight 93. :(  Talk about feeling helpless.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #522 9/10 - 9/12/2006
Post by: KatzHome on September 11, 2006, 12:38:51 PM
Quote from: "thirdstrike"
Listen, I have a question for those of you who seems to be the most knowledgable about this case.  And, that is...realistcally...is the investigation dead?  Are we to have any faith in Dutch to resolve it?  Or is this simply another case of "smoke & mirrors"??


Hi Strike ~ and good morning everyone...

Just walked in the door...  Been 5 years now...  and every year after the first, I think I'm fine with it now...  But every September 11th I still cry...  I went to Mass this morning to commerate this day, like I've done the past 5 years...  each year I think I'm not going to go...  yet each year I'm drawn...

I remembered your friend, SunFreak, and the cousin she lost 5 years ago on this day...  and remembered all who gave their lives...

Father Kevin's homily tied the Gospel of Jesus healing a man's withered hand on the Sabbath, and His active, agressive, ministry of making right what is wrong, in spite of the ire of the Scribes with things that we are seeing today...

He said some people think being a Christian should make us passive and accepting...  But, that he thinks that they are wrong in thinking this...  That there is plenty of evil in the world...  And that we are called to do what we can to right the wrong that we see...

It wasn't until I was driving home that I thought of Aruba...  And yeah, we're doing the right thing...  each doing what we can to bring about justice there...  And yeah, even without what happened to Natalee and her family ~ there's plenty of wrong going down there ~ and we're seeing  repercussions from that wrong being brought to light...

Strike ~ I don't know if we'll ever see justive from Aruba and Holland for those involved in Natalee's death and disappearance ~ but, I don't think it's time to give up now.  I have to believe that the things that we don't know about, the things going on behind the scenes, will bring them all to justice.  And I can't see giving up hope now.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #522 9/10 - 9/12/2006
Post by: Angiex911dsptchr on September 11, 2006, 12:41:15 PM
Hi Katz.. I agree. no time to give up. I hope and pray a resolution to this case is coming near.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #522 9/10 - 9/12/2006
Post by: thirdstrike on September 11, 2006, 12:41:19 PM
Quote from: mrs. red
Quote from: "thirdstrike"
Quote from: "mrs. red"
Quote from: "thirdstrike"
Quote from: "snoopy"
O/T

I forgot to tell ya'll.  I had a wonderful afternoon Saturday!!  Finally got to meet SunnyinTX and Lisa.  Really cool ladies!


Good for you Snoop!  Was that your first time meeting someone in here?  I've yet to, but I've often wondered who has...

Anyone else?[/quote

I know that Flying Mermaid and Slueth met up....


Hey Scarlett!!  I've missed you lately...;)

So, there are others, eh?  Not sure how I'd feel about actually meeting someone.  As much as I'd want to, there's always a slight danger in doing so.  Maybe I'm just paranoid.  Of course, that "paranoia" wouldn't apply to you...;)

How you doin', BTW?  Hope work isn't getting to much in the way of your "fun time" anymore...


Hi ya Third!!!  

I have been working wayyyy too hard... had to run over to the Court today and it was odd thinking about the 5 years ago... today.  Listening to all the great patriotic songs, etc.

I keep missing ya though... good to see you!!


Yeah, I remember 5 years ago like it was yesterday.  Man, what a sad day indeed!  But, with the pain and sorrow associated with it, there was also some real proud moments in the aftermath!  The emergence of those brave men and women who risked (and lost) their lives in attempts to save others...shows just how strong the human spirit can be!!  The many tears that were (and continue to be) shed are not strictly ones of loss!  Some of those tears are from pride and dignity...

As much as I do love my country, I love my GOD more!!  We will get through this tough time...

And, for what it's worth, I too am very happy to have not missed you in here again Scarlett!!  One of my favorites you are...;)


Title: Lively Case Discussion #522 9/10 - 9/12/2006
Post by: mrs. red on September 11, 2006, 12:43:22 PM
Hey Katz,
Yesterday's Church service was about September 11th here too...

Angie, I saw a 9-11 movie where they protrayed you... (and you had on a suit...)  but I knew it was you... God bless you for helping that man find the strength to do what had to be done....

and Strike, Yes I do think in my deepest of heart that there will be justice for Natalee...


Title: Lively Case Discussion #522 9/10 - 9/12/2006
Post by: Angiex911dsptchr on September 11, 2006, 12:44:08 PM
KLASS.. THANK you. I see you are fixing my screw ups..lol  HUGS to you!
SAN gave me a quick crash course over the phone after I managed to mess up so bad.LOL  TY SAN!    TY Klassend!


Title: Lively Case Discussion #522 9/10 - 9/12/2006
Post by: KatzHome on September 11, 2006, 12:44:26 PM
Quote from: "Angiex911dsptchr"
Hi Katz.. I agree. no time to give up. I hope and pray a resolution to this case is coming near.


Oh Ang...  how brain dead of me... to not add your name into my post...  yeah ~ I thought of you too...

Good morning sweetheart...


Title: Lively Case Discussion #522 9/10 - 9/12/2006
Post by: thirdstrike on September 11, 2006, 12:44:26 PM
Quote from: "Angiex911dsptchr"
Quote from: "snoopy"
Quote from: "Angiex911dsptchr"
Hi everyone.. Sad day today is indeed. Klass I have managed to mess up the 911 thread. Maybe you can delete some of my posts..LOL  :)
  I have been working alot and reading up when I can.  THANKS!!!


Hey girl!!  I been thinkin about you.  Thanks for everything you did on that day.


 Snoop Dawg!!  :)  I didnt do anything but pray with someonw aboard Flight 93. :(  Talk about feeling helpless.


Man...I didn't know that Ang!  You were on the line with someone aboard that plane?  Must have been tough for you.  As many have expressed to you (i'm sure)...I wanted to also add my thanks for your efforts!  Seems we've all had some connection to 9/11...directly or otherwise...

Love to you!


Title: Lively Case Discussion #522 9/10 - 9/12/2006
Post by: snoopy on September 11, 2006, 12:45:06 PM
Quote from: "BTgirl"
Quote from: "snoopy"
Quote from: "BTgirl"
Quote from: "snoopy"
O/T

I forgot to tell ya'll.  I had a wonderful afternoon Saturday!!  Finally got to meet SunnyinTX and Lisa.  Really cool ladies!


I'm hoping you get to meet me soon too Snoop!  :D


When is it that you are coming to St. Louis?  I forgot :oops:

That will be great!!


It will be toward the end of October.  :D


K.  Sounds great!


Title: Lively Case Discussion #522 9/10 - 9/12/2006
Post by: Angiex911dsptchr on September 11, 2006, 12:46:02 PM
Quote from: "mrs. red"
Hey Katz,
Yesterday's Church service was about September 11th here too...

Angie, I saw a 9-11 movie where they protrayed you... (and you had on a suit...)  but I knew it was you... God bless you for helping that man find the strength to do what had to be done....

and Strike, Yes I do think in my deepest of heart that there will be justice for Natalee...


  Ty Mrs Red.. my butt wanted nothing to do with media. Other were involved. I wanted out of it. Too freaking emotional for me.

 and I agree.  I feel there wil be justice for Natalee as well. may not be tonight or tomorrow.. but I do think that day will come!  and SOON!


Title: Lively Case Discussion #522 9/10 - 9/12/2006
Post by: KatzHome on September 11, 2006, 12:46:56 PM
Quote from: "Angiex911dsptchr"
Quote from: "snoopy"
Quote from: "Angiex911dsptchr"
Hi everyone.. Sad day today is indeed. Klass I have managed to mess up the 911 thread. Maybe you can delete some of my posts..LOL  :)
  I have been working alot and reading up when I can.  THANKS!!!


Hey girl!!  I been thinkin about you.  Thanks for everything you did on that day.


 Snoop Dawg!!  :)  I didnt do anything but pray with someonw aboard Flight 93. :(  Talk about feeling helpless.


Yeah Angie...  I know...  I know what you did that day...  and I thought of you a lot this morning...


Title: Lively Case Discussion #522 9/10 - 9/12/2006
Post by: snoopy on September 11, 2006, 12:47:16 PM
Quote from: "Angiex911dsptchr"
Quote from: "snoopy"
Quote from: "Angiex911dsptchr"
Hi everyone.. Sad day today is indeed. Klass I have managed to mess up the 911 thread. Maybe you can delete some of my posts..LOL  :)
  I have been working alot and reading up when I can.  THANKS!!!


Hey girl!!  I been thinkin about you.  Thanks for everything you did on that day.


 Snoop Dawg!!  :)  I didnt do anything but pray with someonw aboard Flight 93. :(  Talk about feeling helpless.


Don't sell yourself short Angie.  I know you gave them  great comfort in their time of need, and gave them courage to do what needed to be done.

Let's Roll.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #522 9/10 - 9/12/2006
Post by: klaasend on September 11, 2006, 12:48:55 PM
Quote from: "Angiex911dsptchr"
KLASS.. THANK you. I see you are fixing my screw ups..lol  HUGS to you!
SAN gave me a quick crash course over the phone after I managed to mess up so bad.LOL  TY SAN!    TY Klassend!

I left the duplicates.  Just fixed the ones that didn't show up the first time, lol.  No big deal!


Title: Lively Case Discussion #522 9/10 - 9/12/2006
Post by: KatzHome on September 11, 2006, 12:48:55 PM
Quote from: "snoopy"
Quote from: "Angiex911dsptchr"
Quote from: "snoopy"
Quote from: "Angiex911dsptchr"
Hi everyone.. Sad day today is indeed. Klass I have managed to mess up the 911 thread. Maybe you can delete some of my posts..LOL  :)
  I have been working alot and reading up when I can.  THANKS!!!


Hey girl!!  I been thinkin about you.  Thanks for everything you did on that day.


 Snoop Dawg!!  :)  I didnt do anything but pray with someonw aboard Flight 93. :(  Talk about feeling helpless.


Don't sell yourself short Angie.  I know you gave them  great comfort in their time of need, and gave them courage to do what needed to be done.

Let's Roll.


Yeah, I agree with Snoop, Ang....  Thank you for all that you did...  thank you....


Title: Lively Case Discussion #522 9/10 - 9/12/2006
Post by: Angiex911dsptchr on September 11, 2006, 12:51:28 PM
Quote from: "thirdstrike"
Quote from: "Angiex911dsptchr"
Quote from: "snoopy"
Quote from: "Angiex911dsptchr"
Hi everyone.. Sad day today is indeed. Klass I have managed to mess up the 911 thread. Maybe you can delete some of my posts..LOL  :)
  I have been working alot and reading up when I can.  THANKS!!!


Hey girl!!  I been thinkin about you.  Thanks for everything you did on that day.


 Snoop Dawg!!  :)  I didnt do anything but pray with someonw aboard Flight 93. :(  Talk about feeling helpless.


Man...I didn't know that Ang!  You were on the line with someone aboard that plane?  Must have been tough for you.  As many have expressed to you (i'm sure)...I wanted to also add my thanks for your efforts!  Seems we've all had some connection to 9/11...directly or otherwise...

Love to you!


  Thanks KATZ and THANKS  Third!!  I wrote some of my story in the 911 thread that Justinsmama started.  Yes Third,, I took a call form a man on Flight 93. :( :( :( I can stil l.. hear that mans voice 5 years later.  I wasnt into the media hype then.. didnt want any parts of it. I did meet this mans wife.. she came into our center.. me and 2 others had the blessing to speak to her.  had to tell her her husbands last words. :( I was glad to be able to tel her he made sure he told me to tel his wife he loved her and asked me to recite the Lords prayer with him. I guess I had served my purpose.  Sorry.. this is Natalees thread.. dont mean to be OT..


Title: Lively Case Discussion #522 9/10 - 9/12/2006
Post by: snoopy on September 11, 2006, 12:51:38 PM
BBL Ya'll.  Gotta get some work done.  :shock:

mrs.  I placed my order through Amazon from the front page.  Hope that helps.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #522 9/10 - 9/12/2006
Post by: Angiex911dsptchr on September 11, 2006, 12:53:15 PM
Snoop, Klass, Katx  TY.. I am off today.. which I am glad!
Klass.. Im still learning..LOL   :) :)  ha ha!!


Title: Lively Case Discussion #522 9/10 - 9/12/2006
Post by: klaasend on September 11, 2006, 12:53:50 PM
Need to run an errand, will be right back  :wink:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #522 9/10 - 9/12/2006
Post by: thirdstrike on September 11, 2006, 12:54:24 PM
Quote from: "Angiex911dsptchr"
Quote from: "thirdstrike"
Quote from: "Angiex911dsptchr"
Quote from: "snoopy"
Quote from: "Angiex911dsptchr"
Hi everyone.. Sad day today is indeed. Klass I have managed to mess up the 911 thread. Maybe you can delete some of my posts..LOL  :)
  I have been working alot and reading up when I can.  THANKS!!!


Hey girl!!  I been thinkin about you.  Thanks for everything you did on that day.


 Snoop Dawg!!  :)  I didnt do anything but pray with someonw aboard Flight 93. :(  Talk about feeling helpless.


Man...I didn't know that Ang!  You were on the line with someone aboard that plane?  Must have been tough for you.  As many have expressed to you (i'm sure)...I wanted to also add my thanks for your efforts!  Seems we've all had some connection to 9/11...directly or otherwise...

Love to you!


  Thanks KATZ and THANKS  Third!!  I wrote some of my story in the 911 thread that Justinsmama started.  Yes Third,, I took a call form a man on Flight 93. :( :( :( I can stil l.. hear that mans voice 5 years later.  I wasnt into the media hype then.. didnt want any parts of it. I did meet this mans wife.. she came into our center.. me and 2 others had the blessing to speak to her.  had to tell her her husbands last words. :( I was glad to be able to tel her he made sure he told me to tel his wife he loved her and asked me to recite the Lords prayer with him. I guess I had served my purpose.  Sorry.. this is Natalees thread.. dont mean to be OT..


Damn, that's heavy Ang!  I have to get over to that thread and read.  I'm proud of you...;)


Title: Lively Case Discussion #522 9/10 - 9/12/2006
Post by: mrs. red on September 11, 2006, 12:55:13 PM
Quote from: "Angiex911dsptchr"
Quote from: "mrs. red"
Hey Katz,
Yesterday's Church service was about September 11th here too...

Angie, I saw a 9-11 movie where they protrayed you... (and you had on a suit...)  but I knew it was you... God bless you for helping that man find the strength to do what had to be done....

and Strike, Yes I do think in my deepest of heart that there will be justice for Natalee...


  Ty Mrs Red.. my butt wanted nothing to do with media. Other were involved. I wanted out of it. Too freaking emotional for me.

 and I agree.  I feel there wil be justice for Natalee as well. may not be tonight or tomorrow.. but I do think that day will come!  and SOON!


I thought they did a nice job of the movie.....


Title: Lively Case Discussion #522 9/10 - 9/12/2006
Post by: mrs. red on September 11, 2006, 12:55:48 PM
Quote from: "snoopy"
BBL Ya'll.  Gotta get some work done.  :shock:

mrs.  I placed my order through Amazon from the front page.  Hope that helps.


Thanks Snoopy...

I gotta run


Title: Lively Case Discussion #522 9/10 - 9/12/2006
Post by: KatzHome on September 11, 2006, 12:57:49 PM
I'll go read that thread, when I actually sit down, Angie...  in a few minutes...  it's just about all I feel like doing today...  thinking... and remembering...

And please...  it breaks my heart to see you apologising for being OT on this thread...  especially in that post...  man...


Title: Lively Case Discussion #522 9/10 - 9/12/2006
Post by: Angiex911dsptchr on September 11, 2006, 01:00:10 PM
[quote="thirdstrike

Damn, that's heavy Ang!  I have to get over to that thread and read.  I'm proud of you...;)[/quote]

  :)  Thanks Third..


Title: Lively Case Discussion #522 9/10 - 9/12/2006
Post by: Angiex911dsptchr on September 11, 2006, 01:01:47 PM
Quote from: "mrs. red"
Quote from: "Angiex911dsptchr"
Quote from: "mrs. red"
Hey Katz,
Yesterday's Church service was about September 11th here too...

Angie, I saw a 9-11 movie where they protrayed you... (and you had on a suit...)  but I knew it was you... God bless you for helping that man find the strength to do what had to be done....

and Strike, Yes I do think in my deepest of heart that there will be justice for Natalee...


  Ty Mrs Red.. my butt wanted nothing to do with media. Other were involved. I wanted out of it. Too freaking emotional for me.

 and I agree.  I feel there wil be justice for Natalee as well. may not be tonight or tomorrow.. but I do think that day will come!  and SOON!


I thought they did a nice job of the movie.....


  Mrs I saw bits and peices of the movie.. and last night I tryed.. but unsuccessfully to watch what was on ABC.. I fell asleep before it ended..
:(


Title: Lively Case Discussion #522 9/10 - 9/12/2006
Post by: KatzHome on September 11, 2006, 01:16:04 PM
You know Ang...  I'm kinda surprised that you went outside to have a cigarette...  I would have thought ya'll would be smoking right there at your desks...


Title: Lively Case Discussion #522 9/10 - 9/12/2006
Post by: Bearlyhere on September 11, 2006, 01:22:30 PM
Quote from: "mrs. red"
Quote from: "snoopy"
O/T

If I click on the Amazon site on the front page to order something, will SM get credit?

Glenda Glenda Glenda.......so HER email was addressed to ata huh?  Will wonders ever cease?  ppppfftttt don't get me started on dat woman.


Yes Snoopy, thank you for asking that!   I just got an email that my Larry garrison book will be arriving anyday now....


I have been meaning to ask you, Mrs. Red, if we click on it and don't buy anything, do you get credit for that as well?

Thanks and good afternoon.  Good afternoon all you monkeys, you sure are the bright spot in an otherwise sad day.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #522 9/10 - 9/12/2006
Post by: Angiex911dsptchr on September 11, 2006, 01:25:03 PM
Quote from: "KatzHome"
You know Ang...  I'm kinda surprised that you went outside to have a cigarette...  I would have thought ya'll would be smoking right there at your desks...


  LOl Katz!!  I wish we could have then. and other times.. but no smoking in there.. I really had to beg this gaurd to come outside with me. I went to the SUPV even.. he told him to go ahead and go out there with me.. :)
 and Glen and John came out too.. I didnt write all the details in the other thread.. I coulsdtake up a whole page alone. These little pins mean the world to me.  I got an award before for saving someone from jumping off a damn bridge.. the SAME day. That was a paper certificate.. from the citys PD.. in our county.had to keep the nutso on the phone.. talked about football.. Sex. you name it. I told him to talk to me about whatever he wanted to talk about. OH and he did..LOL  But it was sad at the same time. PD was there.. he had no idea.. had them on another line telling someone to tell me to keep talking to the dude.. and they finally jumped him.. he asked to speak to me .. after they cuffed his butt and was gonna take him to mental health. This guy said Thank you.. you are my Angel.
Wont forget that call either.  :( :(  I need to Shut up!  lol


Title: Lively Case Discussion #522 9/10 - 9/12/2006
Post by: Bearlyhere on September 11, 2006, 01:25:28 PM
Quote from: "Angiex911dsptchr"
Hi everyone.. Sad day today is indeed. Klass I have managed to mess up the 911 thread. Maybe you can delete some of my posts..LOL  :)
  I have been working alot and reading up when I can.  THANKS!!!


I have been thinking of you especially Angie.  Thank God you were there.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #522 9/10 - 9/12/2006
Post by: Goldengirl on September 11, 2006, 01:29:20 PM
Quote from: "Hotshot"
Hi guys, couldn't sleep so I thought I would go look at some sites.  I came across this.  Gottenbos house for sale, its the 3rd one down.  Look at the price!!!  I honestly don't think they want to sell it, just put it up to make things look like that.

http://www.arubarealestate.com/search/real.mv?next



Hi, Hotshot.  I'm curious, are you talking about the white house that's 3rd down?  I find that odd since the Gottenbos boat was supposedly parked by their house, which looks the same color as the VDS home.  If their house is white, was the boat really parked by the VDS home?


Title: Lively Case Discussion #522 9/10 - 9/12/2006
Post by: klaasend on September 11, 2006, 01:34:24 PM
Quote from: "Goldengirl"
Quote from: "Hotshot"
Hi guys, couldn't sleep so I thought I would go look at some sites.  I came across this.  Gottenbos house for sale, its the 3rd one down.  Look at the price!!!  I honestly don't think they want to sell it, just put it up to make things look like that.

http://www.arubarealestate.com/search/real.mv?next



Hi, Hotshot.  I'm curious, are you talking about the white house that's 3rd down?  I find that odd since the Gottenbos boat was supposedly parked by their house, which looks the same color as the VDS home.  If their house is white, was the boat really parked by the VDS home?

Welcome Goldengirl!

It's my understanding that some months back the Gottenbos's painted their home white.  It used to be that yellow color of the Sloots home.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #522 9/10 - 9/12/2006
Post by: KatzHome on September 11, 2006, 01:35:05 PM
Quote from: "Angiex911dsptchr"
Quote from: "KatzHome"
You know Ang...  I'm kinda surprised that you went outside to have a cigarette...  I would have thought ya'll would be smoking right there at your desks...


  LOl Katz!!  I wish we could have then. and other times.. but no smoking in there.. I really had to beg this gaurd to come outside with me. I went to the SUPV even.. he told him to go ahead and go out there with me.. :)
 and Glen and John came out too.. I didnt write all the details in the other thread.. I coulsdtake up a whole page alone. These little pins mean the world to me.  I got an award before for saving someone from jumping off a damn bridge.. the SAME day. That was a paper certificate.. from the citys PD.. in our county.had to keep the nutso on the phone.. talked about football.. Sex. you name it. I told him to talk to me about whatever he wanted to talk about. OH and he did..LOL  But it was sad at the same time. PD was there.. he had no idea.. had them on another line telling someone to tell me to keep talking to the dude.. and they finally jumped him.. he asked to speak to me .. after they cuffed his butt and was gonna take him to mental health. This guy said Thank you.. you are my Angel.
Wont forget that call either.  :( :(  I need to Shut up!  lol


{{{hugs}}}  Ang...  you are an Angel...

 :oops: And I'll check the 9/11 thread too...  cause I asked you a questioin there too...  :oops:  :D


Title: Lively Case Discussion #522 9/10 - 9/12/2006
Post by: Angiex911dsptchr on September 11, 2006, 01:35:54 PM
Quote from: "Bearlyhere"
Quote from: "Angiex911dsptchr"
Hi everyone.. Sad day today is indeed. Klass I have managed to mess up the 911 thread. Maybe you can delete some of my posts..LOL  :)
  I have been working alot and reading up when I can.  THANKS!!!


I have been thinking of you especially Angie.  Thank God you were there.


 Hi there!!  :)  everyone pulled together that day! TEAMWORK! We have had arguments in there at times.. and at times it reminds me of this forum. We were all a close bunch at 911.. like we are here. Sure.. arguments happen.. but we were all there for one main purpose.. to help others.. and workas a TEAM.. just like everyone on this forum is here to help Natalee family.  TEAMWORK!  In good and bad times.. its all it takes.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #522 9/10 - 9/12/2006
Post by: Goldengirl on September 11, 2006, 01:37:20 PM
Quote from: "klaasend"
Quote from: "Goldengirl"
Quote from: "Hotshot"
Hi guys, couldn't sleep so I thought I would go look at some sites.  I came across this.  Gottenbos house for sale, its the 3rd one down.  Look at the price!!!  I honestly don't think they want to sell it, just put it up to make things look like that.

http://www.arubarealestate.com/search/real.mv?next



Hi, Hotshot.  I'm curious, are you talking about the white house that's 3rd down?  I find that odd since the Gottenbos boat was supposedly parked by their house, which looks the same color as the VDS home.  If their house is white, was the boat really parked by the VDS home?

Welcome Goldengirl!

It's my understanding that some months back the Gottenbos's painted their home white.  It used to be that yellow color of the Sloots home.





Thanks, Klaasend.  Guess that explains it.  Is the rumor floating around that they have moved to Atlanta?


Title: Lively Case Discussion #522 9/10 - 9/12/2006
Post by: Bearlyhere on September 11, 2006, 01:39:10 PM
Quote from: "Angiex911dsptchr"
Quote from: "snoopy"
Quote from: "Angiex911dsptchr"
Hi everyone.. Sad day today is indeed. Klass I have managed to mess up the 911 thread. Maybe you can delete some of my posts..LOL  :)
  I have been working alot and reading up when I can.  THANKS!!!


Hey girl!!  I been thinkin about you.  Thanks for everything you did on that day.


 Snoop Dawg!!  :)  I didnt do anything but pray with someonw aboard Flight 93. :(  Talk about feeling helpless.


Angie, if that was me on the other end of the phone, I would think what a great gift you were to me during the scariest moment of my life.  You didn't walk out when things seemed hopeless.  That's what a true angel does.  Your family knew what to name you.  You are a blessing to us here on the list, too.

Take two typos and call me in the morning.   8)


Title: Lively Case Discussion #522 9/10 - 9/12/2006
Post by: klaasend on September 11, 2006, 01:40:48 PM
Quote from: "klaasend"
Quote from: "Goldengirl"
Quote from: "Hotshot"
Hi guys, couldn't sleep so I thought I would go look at some sites.  I came across this.  Gottenbos house for sale, its the 3rd one down.  Look at the price!!!  I honestly don't think they want to sell it, just put it up to make things look like that.

http://www.arubarealestate.com/search/real.mv?next



Hi, Hotshot.  I'm curious, are you talking about the white house that's 3rd down?  I find that odd since the Gottenbos boat was supposedly parked by their house, which looks the same color as the VDS home.  If their house is white, was the boat really parked by the VDS home?

Welcome Goldengirl!

It's my understanding that some months back the Gottenbos's painted their home white.  It used to be that yellow color of the Sloots home.


Photo of the boat at the home after it was painted:

(http://i14.photobucket.com/albums/a306/klaasend/SMKoensFamilyResidenceandBoat.jpg)

Photo of the home before it was painted:

(http://i14.photobucket.com/albums/a306/klaasend/koenhomefront-1.jpg)

Photo of the boat at the home before it was painted:

(http://i14.photobucket.com/albums/a306/klaasend/koenboat.jpg)


Title: Lively Case Discussion #522 9/10 - 9/12/2006
Post by: klaasend on September 11, 2006, 01:42:03 PM
There is a rumor from an Aruban that the Gottenbos's have moved to the states within the last few weeks, possibly Atlanta.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #522 9/10 - 9/12/2006
Post by: KatzHome on September 11, 2006, 01:43:41 PM
Quote from: "Goldengirl"
Quote from: "klaasend"
Quote from: "Goldengirl"
Quote from: "Hotshot"
Hi guys, couldn't sleep so I thought I would go look at some sites.  I came across this.  Gottenbos house for sale, its the 3rd one down.  Look at the price!!!  I honestly don't think they want to sell it, just put it up to make things look like that.

http://www.arubarealestate.com/search/real.mv?next



Hi, Hotshot.  I'm curious, are you talking about the white house that's 3rd down?  I find that odd since the Gottenbos boat was supposedly parked by their house, which looks the same color as the VDS home.  If their house is white, was the boat really parked by the VDS home?

Welcome Goldengirl!

It's my understanding that some months back the Gottenbos's painted their home white.  It used to be that yellow color of the Sloots home.





Thanks, Klaasend.  Guess that explains it.  Is the rumor floating around that they have moved to Atlanta?


Welcome, Goldengirl!  And I don't know if they're moving to Atlanta (I think that's where I read that they were supposed to have moved) has ever been confirmed ...


Title: Lively Case Discussion #522 9/10 - 9/12/2006
Post by: Bearlyhere on September 11, 2006, 01:45:32 PM
Quote from: "Angiex911dsptchr"
Quote from: "Bearlyhere"
Quote from: "Angiex911dsptchr"
Hi everyone.. Sad day today is indeed. Klass I have managed to mess up the 911 thread. Maybe you can delete some of my posts..LOL  :)
  I have been working alot and reading up when I can.  THANKS!!!


I have been thinking of you especially Angie.  Thank God you were there.


 Hi there!!  :)  everyone pulled together that day! TEAMWORK! We have had arguments in there at times.. and at times it reminds me of this forum. We were all a close bunch at 911.. like we are here. Sure.. arguments happen.. but we were all there for one main purpose.. to help others.. and workas a TEAM.. just like everyone on this forum is here to help Natalee family.  TEAMWORK!  In good and bad times.. its all it takes.


Arguments on the forum?  Say it isn't so.   :lol:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #522 9/10 - 9/12/2006
Post by: KatzHome on September 11, 2006, 01:45:37 PM
I'll see everyone later...  I have to go ~ I have a bit of a headache...  and reading the screen is just not helping...


Title: Lively Case Discussion #522 9/10 - 9/12/2006
Post by: Angiex911dsptchr on September 11, 2006, 01:45:47 PM
KATZ.. I answered the best that I could  :)  TY

and Welcome to the new folks.. I been so behind. :(


Title: Lively Case Discussion #522 9/10 - 9/12/2006
Post by: Bearlyhere on September 11, 2006, 01:47:47 PM
Quote from: "KatzHome"
I'll see everyone later...  I have to go ~ I have a bit of a headache...  and reading the screen is just not helping...


Hope you feel better, Katz.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #522 9/10 - 9/12/2006
Post by: Angiex911dsptchr on September 11, 2006, 01:48:03 PM
[quote="Bearlyhere Angie, if that was me on the other end of the phone, I would think what a great gift you were to me during the scariest moment of my life.  You didn't walk out when things seemed hopeless.  That's what a true angel does.  Your family knew what to name you.  You are a blessing to us here on the list, too.

Take two typos and call me in the morning.   8)[/quote]

 LMAO  just 2 typos?   ha ha.. Oh trust me I am no saint..LMAO
My own mother even says .. to this day.. WTH I name you Angela for? LMAO


Title: Lively Case Discussion #522 9/10 - 9/12/2006
Post by: Peaches on September 11, 2006, 01:49:02 PM
Good afternoon.  Getting ready to commute on home.  Lots of good thinking going on here.

Sad news over the weekend.  Christal, absolutely my hero, lost her battle with ependymoma (brain cancer) and made her way home to heaven yesterday morning.  I am beyond sad.

Her CD is almost ready to release.  What a treasure to be able to hear Christal singing along with many other artists.  

Thanks to a Scared Monkey, Christal has a candle page.  You can find it in the Lounge under Pray for Christal.  Thank you all.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #522 9/10 - 9/12/2006
Post by: Jacqueline on September 11, 2006, 01:49:40 PM
Hey Monkeys.....

OT but did not want to open a thread for it....
Sad to read that Anna Nicole's 20 year old son died suddenly just days after she gave birth to her daughter.

I can't imagine joy of giving birth one day, then the next day or so you lose your first born.

Very sad.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #522 9/10 - 9/12/2006
Post by: klaasend on September 11, 2006, 01:51:50 PM
Quote from: "Jacqueline"
Hey Monkeys.....

OT but did not want to open a thread for it....
Sad to read that Anna Nicole's 20 year old son died suddenly just days after she gave birth to her daughter.

I can't imagine joy of giving birth one day, then the next day or so you lose your first born.

Very sad.

I saw that this morning, it is very sad.  They say he was found in his bed.  He was staying at the hospital with his mom.  They do not suspect drugs or alcohol.  So sad for Nichole.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #522 9/10 - 9/12/2006
Post by: Sue on September 11, 2006, 01:52:28 PM
makes you wonder if this has been a planned move since before
Natalee disappeared or with all the on those boys or what is the purpose of moving off that island..
I just wonder WHY they would move to the South if they did infact move here, I guess that dont know that natalees whole family is from the south
and a good many of her and family supporters..
personally I would hunt Koen down but that is just me


Title: Lively Case Discussion #522 9/10 - 9/12/2006
Post by: Angiex911dsptchr on September 11, 2006, 01:54:18 PM
I am so lost anymore.. but I have read Deepaks and Satish statements.. and isnt ironic that their descriptions of the gaurds are damn near exact? and WHO in the hell.. noticeswhat type of material someones clothing is? COTTON TROUSERS??  Gimme a break.   That sounds very rehearsed to me.. wasnt it DARK out? how did they know they were cotton? and not silk.. or jean or polyester for that matter??  Sorry if its been discussed already and other parts of their statements.   and SB if you see this.. I agree with you about the football game last weekend. !


Title: Lively Case Discussion #522 9/10 - 9/12/2006
Post by: Angiex911dsptchr on September 11, 2006, 01:55:18 PM
Quote from: "Jacqueline"
Hey Monkeys.....

OT but did not want to open a thread for it....
Sad to read that Anna Nicole's 20 year old son died suddenly just days after she gave birth to her daughter.

I can't imagine joy of giving birth one day, then the next day or so you lose your first born.

Very sad.


 YIKES!!!!!!!!!!!  What happend Jackie?? do you know??  SAD indeed.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #522 9/10 - 9/12/2006
Post by: mrs. red on September 11, 2006, 01:59:01 PM
Quote from: "Bearlyhere"
Quote from: "mrs. red"
Quote from: "snoopy"
O/T

If I click on the Amazon site on the front page to order something, will SM get credit?

Glenda Glenda Glenda.......so HER email was addressed to ata huh?  Will wonders ever cease?  ppppfftttt don't get me started on dat woman.


Yes Snoopy, thank you for asking that!   I just got an email that my Larry garrison book will be arriving anyday now....


I have been meaning to ask you, Mrs. Red, if we click on it and don't buy anything, do you get credit for that as well?

Thanks and good afternoon.  Good afternoon all you monkeys, you sure are the bright spot in an otherwise sad day.


Hey Bearly.. I ran out to lunch... I don't know... I think we only get credit if ppl buy stuff... but Christmas is coming up... so that will help :wink:  
I just ask/hope that y'all will remember when you shop via Amazon to use our link...


Title: Lively Case Discussion #522 9/10 - 9/12/2006
Post by: mrs. red on September 11, 2006, 02:01:18 PM
Quote from: "Peaches"
Good afternoon.  Getting ready to commute on home.  Lots of good thinking going on here.

Sad news over the weekend.  Christal, absolutely my hero, lost her battle with ependymoma (brain cancer) and made her way home to heaven yesterday morning.  I am beyond sad.

Her CD is almost ready to release.  What a treasure to be able to hear Christal singing along with many other artists.  

Thanks to a Scared Monkey, Christal has a candle page.  You can find it in the Lounge under Pray for Christal.  Thank you all.


Oh peaches, I am so sorry.... that's so hard..


Title: Lively Case Discussion #522 9/10 - 9/12/2006
Post by: Jacqueline on September 11, 2006, 02:01:36 PM
Quote from: "Angiex911dsptchr"
Quote from: "Jacqueline"
Hey Monkeys.....

OT but did not want to open a thread for it....
Sad to read that Anna Nicole's 20 year old son died suddenly just days after she gave birth to her daughter.

I can't imagine joy of giving birth one day, then the next day or so you lose your first born.

Very sad.


 YIKES!!!!!!!!!!!  What happend Jackie?? do you know??  SAD indeed.


As Klaas mentioned, he was found dead Sunday morning, he was staying at a room in the hospital that Anna had given birth in , in the Bahamas.
They do not seem to think drugs or alcohol played a part.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #522 9/10 - 9/12/2006
Post by: Jacqueline on September 11, 2006, 02:02:23 PM
So sorry, Peaches.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #522 9/10 - 9/12/2006
Post by: Angiex911dsptchr on September 11, 2006, 02:03:24 PM
Quote from: "mrs. red"
Quote from: "Peaches"
Good afternoon.  Getting ready to commute on home.  Lots of good thinking going on here.

Sad news over the weekend.  Christal, absolutely my hero, lost her battle with ependymoma (brain cancer) and made her way home to heaven yesterday morning.  I am beyond sad.

Her CD is almost ready to release.  What a treasure to be able to hear Christal singing along with many other artists.  

Thanks to a Scared Monkey, Christal has a candle page.  You can find it in the Lounge under Pray for Christal.  Thank you all.


Oh peaches, I am so sorry.... that's so hard..


 :(  Very sorry to hear the news as well Peaches.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #522 9/10 - 9/12/2006
Post by: Angiex911dsptchr on September 11, 2006, 02:04:59 PM
[quote="Jacqueline
As Klaas mentioned, he was found dead Sunday morning, he was staying at a room in the hospital that Anna had given birth in , in the Bahamas.
They do not seem to think drugs or alcohol played a part.[/quote]

:(   How horrible.  God Bless Anna.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #522 9/10 - 9/12/2006
Post by: Bearlyhere on September 11, 2006, 02:08:10 PM
Quote from: "Angiex911dsptchr"
[quote="Bearlyhere Angie, if that was me on the other end of the phone, I would think what a great gift you were to me during the scariest moment of my life.  You didn't walk out when things seemed hopeless.  That's what a true angel does.  Your family knew what to name you.  You are a blessing to us here on the list, too.

Take two typos and call me in the morning.   8)


 LMAO  just 2 typos?   ha ha.. Oh trust me I am no saint..LMAO
My own mother even says .. to this day.. WTH I name you Angela for? LMAO[/quote]

An angel with horns?  

(pssst, Angie, I know you aren't a saint but we'll just keep it between us, okay?)


Title: Lively Case Discussion #522 9/10 - 9/12/2006
Post by: Bearlyhere on September 11, 2006, 02:09:33 PM
Quote from: "Peaches"
Good afternoon.  Getting ready to commute on home.  Lots of good thinking going on here.

Sad news over the weekend.  Christal, absolutely my hero, lost her battle with ependymoma (brain cancer) and made her way home to heaven yesterday morning.  I am beyond sad.

Her CD is almost ready to release.  What a treasure to be able to hear Christal singing along with many other artists.  

Thanks to a Scared Monkey, Christal has a candle page.  You can find it in the Lounge under Pray for Christal.  Thank you all.


I am so sorry, Peaches.  :cry:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #522 9/10 - 9/12/2006
Post by: Angiex911dsptchr on September 11, 2006, 02:10:40 PM
Quote from: "Bearlyhere"
Quote from: "Angiex911dsptchr"
[quote="Bearlyhere Angie, if that was me on the other end of the phone, I would think what a great gift you were to me during the scariest moment of my life.  You didn't walk out when things seemed hopeless.  That's what a true angel does.  Your family knew what to name you.  You are a blessing to us here on the list, too.

Take two typos and call me in the morning.   8)


 LMAO  just 2 typos?   ha ha.. Oh trust me I am no saint..LMAO
My own mother even says .. to this day.. WTH I name you Angela for? LMAO


An angel with horns?  

(pssst, Angie, I know you aren't a saint but we'll just keep it between us, okay?)[/quote]

 Sure thing Bearley.. our secret..LOL  :)  Glad nobody else knows!

 geesh I was on topic for a change.. about kalpoes statements.. I dont think anyone noticed..lol


Title: Lively Case Discussion #522 9/10 - 9/12/2006
Post by: Bearlyhere on September 11, 2006, 02:13:26 PM
Quote from: "Angiex911dsptchr"
I am so lost anymore.. but I have read Deepaks and Satish statements.. and isnt ironic that their descriptions of the gaurds are damn near exact? and WHO in the hell.. noticeswhat type of material someones clothing is? COTTON TROUSERS??  Gimme a break.   That sounds very rehearsed to me.. wasnt it DARK out? how did they know they were cotton? and not silk.. or jean or polyester for that matter??  Sorry if its been discussed already and other parts of their statements.   and SB if you see this.. I agree with you about the football game last weekend. !


Yes, and they seem to notice clothes from the waist down.  They can't seem to look anyone in the eye, even in their imagination.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #522 9/10 - 9/12/2006
Post by: Angiex911dsptchr on September 11, 2006, 02:20:15 PM
Quote from: "Bearlyhere"
Quote from: "Angiex911dsptchr"
I am so lost anymore.. but I have read Deepaks and Satish statements.. and isnt ironic that their descriptions of the gaurds are damn near exact? and WHO in the hell.. noticeswhat type of material someones clothing is? COTTON TROUSERS??  Gimme a break.   That sounds very rehearsed to me.. wasnt it DARK out? how did they know they were cotton? and not silk.. or jean or polyester for that matter??  Sorry if its been discussed already and other parts of their statements.   and SB if you see this.. I agree with you about the football game last weekend. !


Yes, and they seem to notice clothes from the waist down.  They can't seem to look anyone in the eye, even in their imagination.


  Freaky. SO much of it is.. and who knows if Jorans is gonna come out next? or did it vanish ??


Title: Lively Case Discussion #522 9/10 - 9/12/2006
Post by: msmarple on September 11, 2006, 02:25:28 PM
Hi Monkeys - on a sad day.

I just happened across something I didn't know. I thought early on one of our Aruba posters told us that Aruba uses "911" for emergencies.

At this link --
http://aruba-guide.info/travel.basics/crime/ --

"Report crime to the police by dialing 11100. For the fire department, call 115"

Did we know this? Did Natalee?


Title: Lively Case Discussion #522 9/10 - 9/12/2006
Post by: Angiex911dsptchr on September 11, 2006, 02:28:39 PM
Quote from: "msmarple"
Hi Monkeys - on a sad day.

I just happened across something I didn't know. I thought early on one of our Aruba posters told us that Aruba uses "911" for emergencies.

At this link --
http://aruba-guide.info/travel.basics/crime/ --

"Report crime to the police by dialing 11100. For the fire department, call 115"

Did we know this? Did Natalee?


 Ms.. Ty for posting this.. I never read this before.. those numbers.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #522 9/10 - 9/12/2006
Post by: Angiex911dsptchr on September 11, 2006, 02:37:44 PM
Going back to lurkin.. feel as if I scared some off..LOL
Sorry. Have a good day !


Title: Lively Case Discussion #522 9/10 - 9/12/2006
Post by: klaasend on September 11, 2006, 02:49:51 PM
Quote from: "msmarple"
Hi Monkeys - on a sad day.

I just happened across something I didn't know. I thought early on one of our Aruba posters told us that Aruba uses "911" for emergencies.

At this link --
http://aruba-guide.info/travel.basics/crime/ --

"Report crime to the police by dialing 11100. For the fire department, call 115"

Did we know this? Did Natalee?


According to the Aruba Fire Department website, it's 911:

http://www.arubafiredepartment.com/


Title: Lively Case Discussion #522 9/10 - 9/12/2006
Post by: NM on September 11, 2006, 02:51:07 PM
Quote from: "msmarple"
Hi Monkeys - on a sad day.

I just happened across something I didn't know. I thought early on one of our Aruba posters told us that Aruba uses "911" for emergencies.

At this link --
http://aruba-guide.info/travel.basics/crime/ --

"Report crime to the police by dialing 11100. For the fire department, call 115"

Did we know this? Did Natalee?


Hi MrM and all Monkeys,
I swear that I rememeber arubagirl stating several times that they use 911 b/c of al the American tourists.
That other # is news to me.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #522 9/10 - 9/12/2006
Post by: truthseeker2 on September 11, 2006, 02:58:55 PM
O/T

http://www.signonsandiego.com/news/nation/20060911-1015-missingcruisepassenger.html


FBI investigating
ASSOCIATED PRESS

10:15 a.m. September 11, 2006

MIAMI – Authorities were investigating the disappearance of an Ohio woman who was reported missing Monday from a Carnival Cruise Lines ship.
The 37-year-old woman, whose identity was not released, had been on a four-day cruise to Key West and Mexico.


 
 Advertisement
 
 
 
The Miami-based cruise line said relatives last saw the woman Saturday night, but did not report her missing until Monday, when the ship returned to Miami. FBI spokeswoman Judy Orihuela said, however, that she was not aware of any delay in reporting the disappearance.
“It doesn't look like foul play,” said Orihuela, whose agency is investigating the case.

The disappearance from the Carnival cruise ship Imagination was the latest missing person case involving a cruise this year.

Elizabeth Galeana, 22, of Naples, Fla., apparently fell off a cruise ship in July and drowned. Her body was found off the coast of Italy last month. In May, Daniel DiPiero, 21, of Canfield, Ohio, fell off a cruise ship to the Bahamas after a night of heavy drinking with friends.

The International Council of Cruise Lines, an industry lobbying group, reported earlier this year that a review of data from 15 lines showed 24 reports of missing people between 2003 to 2005.

One of the highest profile cases involving a cruise ship disappearance occurred last summer, when George Allen Smith IV, 26, of Greenwich, Conn., vanished from his honeymoon cruise in the Mediterranean after an apparent late night of drinking. Bloodstains were found on a canopy that covers lifeboats. No one has been charged and no body has been found.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #522 9/10 - 9/12/2006
Post by: klaasend on September 11, 2006, 03:01:52 PM
Geeze NM - not another one!


Title: Lively Case Discussion #522 9/10 - 9/12/2006
Post by: Sue on September 11, 2006, 03:02:19 PM
(http://i62.photobucket.com/albums/h82/BigMouse1925/tarabeach.jpg)

(http://i62.photobucket.com/albums/h82/BigMouse1925/arubacam.jpg)

(http://i62.photobucket.com/albums/h82/BigMouse1925/plbrcam.jpg)

Web Cam from today, The Hotel one is the one in the article Red posted about the time shares on front page..
3 pm in afternoon and the beach is pretty much empty  GOT to love that grassroot boycott


Title: Lively Case Discussion #522 9/10 - 9/12/2006
Post by: mrs. red on September 11, 2006, 03:15:09 PM
Well if you need to be alone completely on the beach, looks like Aruba is the place to go......


NOT THAT I EVER WILL


Title: Lively Case Discussion #522 9/10 - 9/12/2006
Post by: Jacqueline on September 11, 2006, 03:17:03 PM
Quote from: "mrs. red"
Well if you need to be alone completely on the beach, looks like Aruba is the place to go......


NOT THAT I EVER WILL


Sorry folks, Aruba's closed........

The moose outside shoulda told ya! :roll:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #522 9/10 - 9/12/2006
Post by: Anna on September 11, 2006, 03:19:34 PM
.
Good Afternoon, Monkeys,


TRUTHSEEKER2,
Yikes!  Another one goes missing on a cruise?  I received my cruise newsletter today and there are cruises with Holland American ten days for $699 and Norwegian eleven days as low as $649.  I should go and take my boys as I am not sure I can feed them for much less than that, lol.

They have to be just breaking even or even losing money at some of those rates for that very reason.  Guess it is better to lose a nickel than a dime is the thinking.

The entire cruise industry seems to be in a bit of trouble as well some of them should be.  Far too much crime in a controlled environment like that.  And that's if you don't get Norwalk Virus from the food.   :shock:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #522 9/10 - 9/12/2006
Post by: sharon on September 11, 2006, 03:29:48 PM
Good afternoon Monkeys.

http://www.scaredmonkeys.com/2005/06/10/natalee-holloway-information-vii/

This is a link to the front page of Scared Monkeys for June 10th 2005.

These are the front page posts relative to the 'confession and the body' and the 'retraction and no body'.

Just some interesting reading --  posts and posters (many are still here:-))

You can use the 'previous' and 'next' arrows right before or after the comments to navigate to other pages of front page posts. There are a few pages with no posts -- but just hit 'next' and you'll find more.

It has been difficult to focus today, but I must go and do some work. I've been reading those threads most of the day :oops:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #522 9/10 - 9/12/2006
Post by: truthseeker2 on September 11, 2006, 03:30:17 PM
Quote from: "Anna"
.
Good Afternoon, Monkeys,


TRUTHSEEKER2,
Yikes!  Another one goes missing on a cruise?  I received my cruise newsletter today and there are cruises with Holland American ten days for $699 and Norwegian eleven days as low as $649.  I should go and take my boys as I am not sure I can feed them for much less than that, lol.

They have to be just breaking even or even losing money at some of those rates for that very reason.  Guess it is better to lose a nickel than a dime is the thinking.

The entire cruise industry seems to be in a bit of trouble as well some of them should be.  Far too much crime in a controlled environment like that.  And that's if you don't get Norwalk Virus from the food.   :shock:


Well...if you go on a cruise PLEASE don't get drunk and fall overboard.  Seems to be a trend...for Americans, dontchaknow.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #522 9/10 - 9/12/2006
Post by: msmarple on September 11, 2006, 03:33:28 PM
From Truthseeker's post:

Quote
The Miami-based cruise line said relatives last saw the woman Saturday night, but did not report her missing until Monday, when the ship returned to Miami. FBI spokeswoman Judy Orihuela said, however, that she was not aware of any delay in reporting the disappearance.


... seems odd - that no one reported her missing for well over a day. And then what does the FBI spokeswoman's comment mean - no delay?

Suspicious mind ...


Title: Lively Case Discussion #522 9/10 - 9/12/2006
Post by: 2NJSons_Mom on September 11, 2006, 03:35:15 PM
Quote from: "sharon"
Good afternoon Monkeys.

http://www.scaredmonkeys.com/2005/06/10/natalee-holloway-information-vii/

This is a link to the front page of Scared Monkeys for June 10th 2005.

These are the front page posts relative to the 'confession and the body' and the 'retraction and no body'.

Just some interesting reading --  posts and posters (many are still here:-))

You can use the 'previous' and 'next' arrows right before or after the comments to navigate to other pages of front page posts. There are a few pages with no posts -- but just hit 'next' and you'll find more.

It has been difficult to focus today, but I must go and do some work. I've been reading those threads most of the day :oops:


Getting this msg when attempting your link:

CGI-limits reached, please try again later!


Title: Lively Case Discussion #522 9/10 - 9/12/2006
Post by: klaasend on September 11, 2006, 03:37:32 PM
Quote from: "2NJSons_Mom"
Quote from: "sharon"
Good afternoon Monkeys.

http://www.scaredmonkeys.com/2005/06/10/natalee-holloway-information-vii/

This is a link to the front page of Scared Monkeys for June 10th 2005.

These are the front page posts relative to the 'confession and the body' and the 'retraction and no body'.

Just some interesting reading --  posts and posters (many are still here:-))

You can use the 'previous' and 'next' arrows right before or after the comments to navigate to other pages of front page posts. There are a few pages with no posts -- but just hit 'next' and you'll find more.

It has been difficult to focus today, but I must go and do some work. I've been reading those threads most of the day :oops:


Getting this msg when attempting your link:

CGI-limits reached, please try again later!

Keep trying.  I think there is alot of internet traffic today because of the 9/11 anniversary.  I've been getting the same error trying to moderate the front page posts but if you keep trying you can get though.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #522 9/10 - 9/12/2006
Post by: sharon on September 11, 2006, 03:38:55 PM
Quote from: "2NJSons_Mom"
Quote from: "sharon"
Good afternoon Monkeys.

http://www.scaredmonkeys.com/2005/06/10/natalee-holloway-information-vii/

This is a link to the front page of Scared Monkeys for June 10th 2005.

These are the front page posts relative to the 'confession and the body' and the 'retraction and no body'.

Just some interesting reading --  posts and posters (many are still here:-))

You can use the 'previous' and 'next' arrows right before or after the comments to navigate to other pages of front page posts. There are a few pages with no posts -- but just hit 'next' and you'll find more.

It has been difficult to focus today, but I must go and do some work. I've been reading those threads most of the day :oops:


Getting this msg when attempting your link:

CGI-limits reached, please try again later!



I'm not sure why 2NJSons_Mom.

I just clicked on it from your post and it still brought me to the right page.

Klaas! Teacher! Please, help.

.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #522 9/10 - 9/12/2006
Post by: sharon on September 11, 2006, 03:41:06 PM
Phew! Thanks Klaas.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #522 9/10 - 9/12/2006
Post by: klaasend on September 11, 2006, 03:47:33 PM
Quote from: "sharon"
Phew! Thanks Klaas.

 :lol: Nope, not a bad link.  Red and I have been having the same problem all morning on the front page.

Those front page posts and comments are very interresting from the beginning of the case, all of June 2005 actually.  I've read them several times.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #522 9/10 - 9/12/2006
Post by: Anna on September 11, 2006, 03:49:47 PM
Quote from: "truthseeker2"
[Well...if you go on a cruise PLEASE don't get drunk and fall overboard.  Seems to be a trend...for Americans, dontchaknow.


Not a chance. . . don't drink that much for one thing but not going for another.  I do like to watch the prices fall for indication of the effects of the boycott.  Very very few list Aruba as a stopover any more, rare and mostly limited to Holland America and Royal Dutch, Norwegian, companies owned by the Dutch.

But there were hearings before congress not too long ago about crime on board cruise ships and there are lots of rapes and other things happening as well as folks just falling overboard all the time.

And I still wonder exactly what happened with Amy Bradley, yet another cruise ship mystery.

But with thres 6 ft boys, I can't help but wonder how they can do this so cheaply as sounds about like their grocery bill sometimes at $69 a day all inclusive, etc.  

I do hope the message is sinking in to those in the tourist industry that we are not going to pay people to abuse us.  And most especially I hope Aruba is finally getting that message but am not holding my breath that they are.

. :roll:

.

.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #522 9/10 - 9/12/2006
Post by: Kimmy53 on September 11, 2006, 03:50:56 PM
Quote from: "Peaches"
Good afternoon.  Getting ready to commute on home.  Lots of good thinking going on here.

Sad news over the weekend.  Christal, absolutely my hero, lost her battle with ependymoma (brain cancer) and made her way home to heaven yesterday morning.  I am beyond sad.

Her CD is almost ready to release.  What a treasure to be able to hear Christal singing along with many other artists.  

Thanks to a Scared Monkey, Christal has a candle page.  You can find it in the Lounge under Pray for Christal.  Thank you all.


Oh Peaches.  I am so sorry to hear of Christal's passing.  She is now at peace and is whole again.   Prayers of comfort and peace for her family..  ((((hugs)))) to you Peaches


Title: Lively Case Discussion #522 9/10 - 9/12/2006
Post by: nonesuche on September 11, 2006, 03:54:34 PM
Quote from: "mrs. red"
Well if you need to be alone completely on the beach, looks like Aruba is the place to go......


NOT THAT I EVER WILL


I am sorry, I should not laugh but this struck me so funny  :lol:  :lol:

I have this image of you saying this deadpan, just cracking me up, thanks for making me laugh today.  :lol:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #522 9/10 - 9/12/2006
Post by: nonesuche on September 11, 2006, 03:55:52 PM
Kimmy-

I agree, Peaches did so much for our family and also for Christal's. No one could care more or try more than Peaches. So now we need to help keep Peaches well.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #522 9/10 - 9/12/2006
Post by: crazybabyborg on September 11, 2006, 03:57:30 PM
Just checking in with you guys on this day of remembering who we are and what we stand for.......

Whether it's one child from Alabama with a bright future, or thousands of our citizens going about their day, when foreign evil strikes an American, we've all been victimized.

(http://i14.photobucket.com/albums/a306/klaasend/eagle-flag-6.jpg)


Title: Lively Case Discussion #522 9/10 - 9/12/2006
Post by: crazybabyborg on September 11, 2006, 03:58:47 PM
KLAAS!? I didn't mean to show up just to blow the margins!!!!  :oops:  :oops:  :oops:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #522 9/10 - 9/12/2006
Post by: Atlmetroguy on September 11, 2006, 04:09:43 PM
Hello Monkeys...I trust everyone is well today...


Title: Lively Case Discussion #522 9/10 - 9/12/2006
Post by: Hotshot on September 11, 2006, 04:13:10 PM
Quote from: "Goldengirl"
Quote from: "Hotshot"
Hi guys, couldn't sleep so I thought I would go look at some sites.  I came across this.  Gottenbos house for sale, its the 3rd one down.  Look at the price!!!  I honestly don't think they want to sell it, just put it up to make things look like that.

http://www.arubarealestate.com/search/real.mv?next



Hi, Hotshot.  I'm curious, are you talking about the white house that's 3rd down?  I find that odd since the Gottenbos boat was supposedly parked by their house, which looks the same color as the VDS home.  If their house is white, was the boat really parked by the VDS home?


No that was rumor that it was parked by the VDS house.  The Gottenbos painted their house.  It used to be yellow.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #522 9/10 - 9/12/2006
Post by: yapperz1 on September 11, 2006, 04:18:29 PM
Hiya Monkeys

Anna, Holland America is no longer owned by the Dutch. They along with
Princess Cruises, Cunard Line, Costa Cruises, Windstar Cruises and the Yachts of Seabourn are owned by Carnival Cruise Lines now.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #522 9/10 - 9/12/2006
Post by: Hotshot on September 11, 2006, 04:19:34 PM
Quote from: "msmarple"
Hi Monkeys - on a sad day.

I just happened across something I didn't know. I thought early on one of our Aruba posters told us that Aruba uses "911" for emergencies.

At this link --
http://aruba-guide.info/travel.basics/crime/ --

"Report crime to the police by dialing 11100. For the fire department, call 115"

Did we know this? Did Natalee?

Funny I keep running across that also.  So the question is, does 911 apply to Aruba?


Title: Lively Case Discussion #522 9/10 - 9/12/2006
Post by: Anna on September 11, 2006, 04:26:16 PM
Quote from: "yapperz1"
Hiya Monkeys

Anna, Holland America is no longer owned by the Dutch. They along with
Princess Cruises, Cunard Line, Costa Cruises, Windstar Cruises and the Yachts of Seabourn are owned by Carnival Cruise Lines now.


Yapperz,
Thanks!  Aha!  Carnival lies when they say they no longer go to Aruba then!   :?


Title: Lively Case Discussion #522 9/10 - 9/12/2006
Post by: klaasend on September 11, 2006, 04:27:17 PM
Quote from: "Atlmetroguy"
Hello Monkeys...I trust everyone is well today...

Hi stranger - how are you?


Title: Lively Case Discussion #522 9/10 - 9/12/2006
Post by: Anna on September 11, 2006, 04:29:27 PM
.
Hotshot,
I think the paint is why I couldn't find the Gottenbos home last night.  So it is one of the ones listed for over a million dollars then?  That does seem too high and you may be right that they do not really want to sell it.  Maybe they are just hiding out until this problem passes and have no idea that we are not going away.

This may also be a form of denial that tourism is down and the boycott has had any effect for many do seem to think the opposite is happening in Aruba.

.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #522 9/10 - 9/12/2006
Post by: yapperz1 on September 11, 2006, 04:30:43 PM
Anna, technically yes they do. They are taking the "Carnival" ships out of Aruba but Holland America will still be visiting. I have been writing them about this too.

Hiya Metro!!!!


Title: Lively Case Discussion #522 9/10 - 9/12/2006
Post by: Angiex911dsptchr on September 11, 2006, 04:34:21 PM
Quote from: "Atlmetroguy"
Hello Monkeys...I trust everyone is well today...


 Hey Metro. Glad to see you! Hope you are doing well.!!


Title: Lively Case Discussion #522 9/10 - 9/12/2006
Post by: Ono on September 11, 2006, 04:39:12 PM
Quote from: "Ono"
Quote from: "the big hammer"
Deepak: Off the Reservation on 6/11

Deepak comes out w/ the beach drop-off story on 6/11 in his "suspect statement" -- breaking the party line on the HI story and "officially" goes off the reservation...

WHY?

After all, he has lied as a "witness" in a capital crime case, he has perjured himself and is open to numerous additional charges.  His attorney learns that there is no "relevant" jvds "witness" statement on 6/9. (And this TRUE, whether a jvds witness statement exists or not.) And within 48 hours, deepak is singing a completely different tune.

I believe deepak and his attorneys correctly surmised and deduced they were being set up.  And this would be wholly keeping w/ Paulus method of having a "plan B" if the arrest of the guards failed to produce desired outcome.  The longer k2 sticks with HI lie, the worse the perjury gets, the worse the potential obstruction charges get.


To protect himself and his brother, he goes off the reservation.  He tells the "truth" on 6/11 -- directly implicating jvds as last person w/ Natalee.  He does so because he is threatened and exposed.

The stated "IRRELEVANCE" of the jvd witness statement by k2 attorney is clear signal, during 6/9-6/11 w/ security guard/HI story collapsing, the sloots will try to pin k2, and their own FALSE WITNESS statements are Exhibit 1.


Makes total sense.  I am now thinking that those photos of Satish at the Sloot Compound pool party may actually have been taken way PRIOR to Joran's release, and only posted on the date of/right after his release for PR  appearances' sake?




 :shock: My comments were the third paragraph ! ?? :?

Edit - is this correct?


Title: Lively Case Discussion #522 9/10 - 9/12/2006
Post by: Atlmetroguy on September 11, 2006, 04:39:56 PM
Hey everybody who said hello!! I'm having a really rare slow afternoon with this new job..I've been a busy monkey!!


Title: Lively Case Discussion #522 9/10 - 9/12/2006
Post by: Ono on September 11, 2006, 04:41:11 PM
Quote from: "Ono"
Quote from: "Ono"
Quote from: "the big hammer"
Deepak: Off the Reservation on 6/11

Deepak comes out w/ the beach drop-off story on 6/11 in his "suspect statement" -- breaking the party line on the HI story and "officially" goes off the reservation...

WHY?

After all, he has lied as a "witness" in a capital crime case, he has perjured himself and is open to numerous additional charges.  His attorney learns that there is no "relevant" jvds "witness" statement on 6/9. (And this TRUE, whether a jvds witness statement exists or not.) And within 48 hours, deepak is singing a completely different tune.

Makes total sense.  I am now thinking that those photos of Satish at the Sloot Compound pool party may actually have been taken way PRIOR to Joran's release, and only posted on the date of/right after his release for PR  appearances' sake?

I believe deepak and his attorneys correctly surmised and deduced they were being set up.  And this would be wholly keeping w/ Paulus method of having a "plan B" if the arrest of the guards failed to produce desired outcome.  The longer k2 sticks with HI lie, the worse the perjury gets, the worse the potential obstruction charges get.

To protect himself and his brother, he goes off the reservation.  He tells the "truth" on 6/11 -- directly implicating jvds as last person w/ Natalee.  He does so because he is threatened and exposed.

The stated "IRRELEVANCE" of the jvd witness statement by k2 attorney is clear signal, during 6/9-6/11 w/ security guard/HI story collapsing, the sloots will try to pin k2, and their own FALSE WITNESS statements are Exhibit 1.


 :shock: My comments were the third paragraph ! ?? :?


I started out by saying: "Makes total sense".....oi vey ~ :?


Title: Lively Case Discussion #522 9/10 - 9/12/2006
Post by: klaasend on September 11, 2006, 04:44:37 PM
Ono - check the bottom of page 27, think I've fixed it now.  I deleted the first post where it was mixed in the middle.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #522 9/10 - 9/12/2006
Post by: Shizaru on September 11, 2006, 04:56:55 PM
Added to timeline from Bubali statments:


Sunday

Deepak observes that Natalee dances beautifully and does not appear unsteady on her feet when she steps off the stage, altho he initially tells polis he could tell she was drunk from how she was dancing and that she swayed on her feet when she walked. She walks up to Joran and Deepak hears her say "Hi, how's it going? Why didn't you dance with me?" Deepak hears Joran laugh hard but can't hear his answer, Natalee again asks him to dance and Joran declines.  Deepak then sees Natalee walk over to some of her friends, three girls and two boys. Deepak speaks to a friend for 5-10 minutes, then can't find Satish and Joran so he goes outside to wait in the car (D 5/31, 6/9, 6/11)

Natalee tells Deepak that he has beautiful car and she wants to drive around. (D 5/31, 6/9)

Natalee calls a boy's name, which Deepak can't remember  (D 5/31)  

Tuesday

3:30 pm: Deepak gives his witness statement at Bubali station, in which he describes the trip to the lighthouse, and the fictional HI dropoff with the security guard. Polis ask Deepak if Joran and Natalee had gotten out of the car and walked by the sea at the Fisherman's Huts, and he says no.

7:20 pm: Satish gives his witness statement at Bubali station, in which he describes the trip to the lighthouse, and the fictional HI dropoff with the security guard. Satish claims that while in the car he saw Joran both kissing and fingering Natalee, altho his 6/11 statement only mentions kissing.  In this statement, Satish seems to contradict Joran and Deepak on several points regarding the events at CnCs: He says that Joran danced with Natalee, and that he then left Joran and Deepak and walked around inside CnCs,  and he implies that the four of them walked out of CnCs together. Polis ask Satish if Joran and Natalee had gotten out of the car and walked by the sea at the Fisherman's Huts, and he says no.

June 11: Deepak and Satish give statements in which they admit having lied about leaving Natalee at the HI, and say that Joran and Natalee got out at the beach near the Marriott.  Deepak says he thinks that Joran raped Natalee, but did not murder her. Satish's description of events at CnCs is now consistent with that of Joran and Deepak.

http://blogsfornatalee.com/forums/index.php?topic=4590.msg146617#msg146617


Title: Lively Case Discussion #522 9/10 - 9/12/2006
Post by: klaasend on September 11, 2006, 04:58:18 PM
Thanks Shizaru!


Title: Lively Case Discussion #522 9/10 - 9/12/2006
Post by: sharon on September 11, 2006, 04:58:47 PM
Quote from: "Anna"
Quote from: "yapperz1"
Hiya Monkeys

Anna, Holland America is no longer owned by the Dutch. They along with
Princess Cruises, Cunard Line, Costa Cruises, Windstar Cruises and the Yachts of Seabourn are owned by Carnival Cruise Lines now.


Yapperz,
Thanks!  Aha!  Carnival lies when they say they no longer go to Aruba then!   :?


 :) No. They don't.

Carnival Cruise Lines -- is a cruise line BRAND owned by Carnival Corp.

Holland America is a cruise line BRAND owned by Carnival Corp.

Cunard is cruise line BRAND owned by Carnival Corp.

Seabourn is a cruise line BRAND owned by Carnival Corp.

And the list goes on.......

I do not believe I have ever seen a statement about Aruba from Carnival Corp -- which owns Holland America.

The statement you are referring to was from Carnival Cruise Line.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #522 9/10 - 9/12/2006
Post by: sharon on September 11, 2006, 05:04:26 PM
Quote from: "yapperz1"
Anna, technically yes they do. They are taking the "Carnival" ships out of Aruba but Holland America will still be visiting. I have been writing them about this too.

Hiya Metro!!!!


yapperz1 -- I have never seen a statement from Corporate. Just CCL.

If you are writing Corporate -- and can convince them -- that's alot of cruise lines that won't call on Aruba. :D Carnival Corp pretty much owns everything but RCL and NCL. :wink:

But each of the brands has it's own headquarters and president.

If I can help you with any names or addresses, please let me know. Carnival Corp and Canrival Cruise are both home based here in Miami.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #522 9/10 - 9/12/2006
Post by: Hotshot on September 11, 2006, 05:05:31 PM
Quote from: "Anna"
.
Hotshot,
I think the paint is why I couldn't find the Gottenbos home last night.  So it is one of the ones listed for over a million dollars then?  That does seem too high and you may be right that they do not really want to sell it.  Maybe they are just hiding out until this problem passes and have no idea that we are not going away.

This may also be a form of denial that tourism is down and the boycott has had any effect for many do seem to think the opposite is happening in Aruba.

.

LOL, it was close to a million (875,000) I do believe.  So sad isn't it?  I personally want to see the VDS's house go up for sale.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #522 9/10 - 9/12/2006
Post by: yapperz1 on September 11, 2006, 05:10:19 PM
Thanks Sharon. It is the CCL ships which won't be going to Aruba. I am writing corporate hq as a frequent passenger of CCL & Holland America.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #522 9/10 - 9/12/2006
Post by: Ono on September 11, 2006, 05:11:21 PM
Quote from: "darleenofalabama"
HELLO, YA'LL!!!!!!!!!!!  I've just read the last few posts here, and I've something to contribute:  I doubt that Wonderwoman is a real Republican.  I don't know where she is, but she probably isn't really out fund-raising for the Republican Party.  :D   I did not see her in Europe, either.   :D  (Which doesn't mean she wasn't there.)

I'll see ya'll the next time I have anything to contribute.   :lol:   Wishing everyone well!


 Yo Darleen ! How are you ?  :D
:shock: I doubt seriously that Wonderwoman is even an American, much less a Republican...!


Title: Lively Case Discussion #522 9/10 - 9/12/2006
Post by: Spock on September 11, 2006, 05:14:31 PM
Janssen can not only charge and prosecute Deepak and Satish for giving false statements as a witness in a murder investigation, there is a greater charge to be filed and prosecuted:

Conspiracy to Obstruct a Murder Investigation

The two did not act individually to implicate the security guards, they worked up the story together to have the SGs arrested. Remember what Micky John said he heard Deepak say while they both were in custody:

"He (Deepak) said a story being made up about dropping the girl of at a Holiday Inn, was all something being made up. He, and the Dutch guy, and the Dutch guy's father, they sit and made up the story".


Title: Lively Case Discussion #522 9/10 - 9/12/2006
Post by: NM on September 11, 2006, 05:17:11 PM
Quote from: "Ono"
Quote from: "Ono"
Quote from: "the big hammer"
Deepak: Off the Reservation on 6/11

Deepak comes out w/ the beach drop-off story on 6/11 in his "suspect statement" -- breaking the party line on the HI story and "officially" goes off the reservation...

WHY?

After all, he has lied as a "witness" in a capital crime case, he has perjured himself and is open to numerous additional charges.  His attorney learns that there is no "relevant" jvds "witness" statement on 6/9. (And this TRUE, whether a jvds witness statement exists or not.) And within 48 hours, deepak is singing a completely different tune.

I believe deepak and his attorneys correctly surmised and deduced they were being set up.  And this would be wholly keeping w/ Paulus method of having a "plan B" if the arrest of the guards failed to produce desired outcome.  The longer k2 sticks with HI lie, the worse the perjury gets, the worse the potential obstruction charges get.


To protect himself and his brother, he goes off the reservation.  He tells the "truth" on 6/11 -- directly implicating jvds as last person w/ Natalee.  He does so because he is threatened and exposed.

The stated "IRRELEVANCE" of the jvd witness statement by k2 attorney is clear signal, during 6/9-6/11 w/ security guard/HI story collapsing, the sloots will try to pin k2, and their own FALSE WITNESS statements are Exhibit 1.


Makes total sense.  I am now thinking that those photos of Satish at the Sloot Compound pool party may actually have been taken way PRIOR to Joran's release, and only posted on the date of/right after his release for PR  appearances' sake?




 :shock: My comments were the third paragraph ! ?? :?

Edit - is this correct?


Hey Monks!!
Hi Hammer,
Check this out dk spills the HI is a lie and the pow-wow around the pool to Mikey sometime June9-10. when jurin finds out he panics and confesses to everything during the late hrs of June 10, the confession is reported then retracted in the press from June 10 11PM-June 11 1AM, then dk give the fish.hut story June11.

Hi Ono,
Linda posted on FP #67 of the dk 5-31 statement that those photos were taking before jurin was detained.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #522 9/10 - 9/12/2006
Post by: klaasend on September 11, 2006, 05:24:46 PM
NM - I know Linda said that about that photo but I don't believe her.  I don't think she really knows.  If you look at Flor, Joran and Freddy it looks like it was taken in September 2005 not way before, IMO.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #522 9/10 - 9/12/2006
Post by: the big hammer on September 11, 2006, 05:28:49 PM
Conspiracy

A felony crime

From Black's Law Dictionary (granted addresses offenses under the US Code):

CONSPIRACY
A conspiracy is "an agreement by two or more persons to commit an unlawful act, coupled with an intent to achieve the agreement's objective, and [often] action or conduct that furthers the agreement; a combination for an unlawful purpose." Black's Law Dictionary 329 (8th ed. 2005). Conspiracy always involves two or more people, because a person cannot conspire with himself. United States v. Moss, 591 F.2d 428, 434 (8th Cir. 1979). It is a separate offense from the crime that is the object of the conspiracy, and the conspiracy ends when either the unlawful act has been committed or when the agreement has been abandoned. Id. It does not automatically end if the object of the conspiracy is defeated. Id. The statute that deals primarily with conspiracy is 18 U.S.C. § 371 (2005), but there are some statutes that deal with conspiracies for specific unlawful acts, the most common being 18 U.S.C. § 1956(h) (2005) (money laundering), and 21 U.S.C. § 846 (2005) (controlled substances). Many times, a defendant will be charged with conspiracy along with the actual crime the defendant is accused of committing. For example, see United States v. Walsh, 75 F.3d 1 (1st Cir. 1996) (defendant charged with conspiracy, bank fraud, and making false statements); Huff v. United States, 301 F.2d 760 (5th Cir. 1962) (defendants charged with conspiracy, and wire fraud); United States v. Buschman, 386 F. Supp. 822 (E.D. Wis. 1975) (defendant charged with conspiracy, and interstate transportation of stolen goods). Other times, the defendant will be charged with only one count of conspiracy. See, for example, Coluccio v. United States, 313 F. Supp. 2d 150 (E.D.N.Y. 2004) (defendant charged with conspiracy to defraud the United States government); United States v. Fantin, 130 F. Supp. 2d 385 (W.D.N.Y. 2000) (defendant charged with one count of conspiracy to commit wire and mail fraud).

18 U.S.C. § 371 (2005)

The Crime
It is a violation of section 371 for "two or more persons" to conspire
to commit any offense against the United States, or
" to defraud the United States, or any agency thereof in any manner or for any purpose, if one or more of such persons does any act to effect the object of the conspiracy. 18 U.S.C. § 371 (2005).

The Punishment
The punishment for a violation of section 371 is

a fine,
imprisonment for not more than five years,
or both. 18 U.S.C. § 371 (2005).

If the offense contemplated is a misdemeanor, the punishment shall not exceed the maximum punishment provided for such misdemeanor. Id.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #522 9/10 - 9/12/2006
Post by: Carnut on September 11, 2006, 05:35:15 PM
Quote from: "Hotshot"
Quote from: "Anna"
.
Hotshot,
I think the paint is why I couldn't find the Gottenbos home last night.  So it is one of the ones listed for over a million dollars then?  That does seem too high and you may be right that they do not really want to sell it.  Maybe they are just hiding out until this problem passes and have no idea that we are not going away.

This may also be a form of denial that tourism is down and the boycott has had any effect for many do seem to think the opposite is happening in Aruba.

.

LOL, it was close to a million (875,000) I do believe.  So sad isn't it?  I personally want to see the VDS's house go up for sale.


Isn't that just a drop in the bucket for drug money?


Title: Lively Case Discussion #522 9/10 - 9/12/2006
Post by: NM on September 11, 2006, 05:36:26 PM
Quote from: "klaasend"
NM - I know Linda said that about that photo but I don't believe her.  I don't think she really knows.  If you look at Flor, Joran and Freddy it looks like it was taken in September 2005 not way before, IMO.


Hey Klaas, Thank you!. I feel like you just pulled me up from a crack in the ground to hell! Thank you!

urgh! fooled again by a big aruba "people"!  This time b/c she is one of the few still around posting.  And seems congenial, which is their M.O.

I will repeat to myself 1,000 times. do not trust arubans, do not trust arubans.....

PS you mean Sept 2006

Sorry to my fellow Monkeys for spreading the bs. It was not intentional. Just stupid.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #522 9/10 - 9/12/2006
Post by: klaasend on September 11, 2006, 05:41:34 PM
Quote from: "NM"
Quote from: "klaasend"
NM - I know Linda said that about that photo but I don't believe her.  I don't think she really knows.  If you look at Flor, Joran and Freddy it looks like it was taken in September 2005 not way before, IMO.


Hey Klaas, Thank you!. I feel like you just pulled me up from a crack in the ground to hell! Thank you!

urgh! fooled again by a big aruba "people"!  This time b/c she is one of the few still around posting.  And seems congenial, which is their M.O.

I will repeat to myself 1,000 times. do not trust arubans, do not trust arubans.....

PS you mean Sept 2006

Sorry to my fellow Monkeys for spreading the bs. It was not intentional. Just stupid.

No, I mean September 2005 when Joran was released from detention.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #522 9/10 - 9/12/2006
Post by: Ono on September 11, 2006, 05:46:19 PM
Quote from: "Ono"
Quote from: "Ono"
Quote from: "the big hammer"
Deepak: Off the Reservation on 6/11

Deepak comes out w/ the beach drop-off story on 6/11 in his "suspect statement" -- breaking the party line on the HI story and "officially" goes off the reservation...

WHY?

After all, he has lied as a "witness" in a capital crime case, he has perjured himself and is open to numerous additional charges.  His attorney learns that there is no "relevant" jvds "witness" statement on 6/9. (And this TRUE, whether a jvds witness statement exists or not.) And within 48 hours, deepak is singing a completely different tune.

I believe deepak and his attorneys correctly surmised and deduced they were being set up.  And this would be wholly keeping w/ Paulus method of having a "plan B" if the arrest of the guards failed to produce desired outcome.  The longer k2 sticks with HI lie, the worse the perjury gets, the worse the potential obstruction charges get.


To protect himself and his brother, he goes off the reservation.  He tells the "truth" on 6/11 -- directly implicating jvds as last person w/ Natalee.  He does so because he is threatened and exposed.

The stated "IRRELEVANCE" of the jvd witness statement by k2 attorney is clear signal, during 6/9-6/11 w/ security guard/HI story collapsing, the sloots will try to pin k2, and their own FALSE WITNESS statements are Exhibit 1.


Makes total sense.  I am now thinking that those photos of Satish at the Sloot Compound pool party may actually have been taken way PRIOR to Joran's release, and only posted on the date of/right after his release for PR  appearances' sake?




 :shock: My comments were the third paragraph ! ?? :?

Edit - is this correct?


Yes! Thanks Klass! You're good ~ :D


Title: Lively Case Discussion #522 9/10 - 9/12/2006
Post by: the big hammer on September 11, 2006, 05:46:48 PM
deepak 6/11: The "truth" OR another cover story?

NM writes: "...Check this out dk spills the HI is a lie and the pow-wow around the pool to Mikey sometime June9-10. when jurin finds out he panics and confesses to everything during the late hrs of June 10, the confession is reported then retracted in the press from June 10 11PM-June 11 1AM, then dk give the fish.hut story June11..."


On 6/11, all of them are telling the beach drop off story.  Has everybody been brought back to the reservation OR is this a "Mexican" standoff?

Could be a little of both.

1.  Through false witness statement and perjury charges, k2 are in trouble based on their witness statements.  
2.  The false witness statements implicates k2 directly, maing them much more suspicious than jvds.
3.  jvds has not provided a "witness statement" and k2 lawyer says she has been told (by prosecution?) that jvds statement is not "relevant" and presumably not provided...
4.  See how guilty k2 looks at this stage?

But on 6/10 jvds confesses, and retracts, and on 6/11 everyone is saying the fisherman's huts and beach drop off story.

Maybe deepak said: "You are try to frame me, and I'm going to spill it all" panicking jvds, until Paulus came in as "cat wrangler" and got everyone back in the cage.  

And there it sits: a failed frame up of k2, but k2 w/ criminal behavior on record (perjury, obstruction, contempt, conspiracy) and knowledge of what happened (polis car tape) can put jvds on trial for murder.  

So no prosecution of k2. And no accurate "witness" statement (from k2) to nail the sloots.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #522 9/10 - 9/12/2006
Post by: Ono on September 11, 2006, 05:51:39 PM
Quote from: "klaasend"
Ono - check the bottom of page 27, think I've fixed it now.  I deleted the first post where it was mixed in the middle.


 :D Klass: You are the best! Thanks!!


Title: Lively Case Discussion #522 9/10 - 9/12/2006
Post by: Spock on September 11, 2006, 06:01:19 PM
Quote from: "Spock"
Janssen can not only charge and prosecute Deepak and Satish for giving false statements as a witness in a murder investigation, there is a greater charge to be filed and prosecuted:

Conspiracy to Obstruct a Murder Investigation

The two did not act individually to implicate the security guards, they worked up the story together to have the SGs arrested. Remember what Micky John said he heard Deepak say while they both were in custody:

"He (Deepak) said a story being made up about dropping the girl of at a Holiday Inn, was all something being made up. He, and the Dutch guy, and the Dutch guy's father, they sit and made up the story".


At least three counts:

(1)  Purjury (giving a signed false declaration)
(2)  Obstuction of a Murder Investigation (led to the arrest of innocents)
(3)  Conspiracy to Obstuct A Murder Investigation (collectively lied)

This should put the Kalpoes in jail for at least a year or two.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #522 9/10 - 9/12/2006
Post by: igsigs on September 11, 2006, 06:11:09 PM
Something Bad Happened    6/11/05

It was unclear if the 6am arrest was related to the admission. The same team of officers who arrested five others in the case during the past week went to a home just outside Oranjestad, the capital, and came out with a handcuffed man who looked to be in his 20s.

http://www.totallydelco.com/062105.shtml

Who was arrested on this Saturday Anybody remember?


Title: Lively Case Discussion #522 9/10 - 9/12/2006
Post by: Ono on September 11, 2006, 06:12:41 PM
Quote from: "Spock"
Janssen can not only charge and prosecute Deepak and Satish for giving false statements as a witness in a murder investigation, there is a greater charge to be filed and prosecuted:

Conspiracy to Obstruct a Murder Investigation

The two did not act individually to implicate the security guards, they worked up the story together to have the SGs arrested. Remember what Micky John said he heard Deepak say while they both were in custody:

"He (Deepak) said a story being made up about dropping the girl of at a Holiday Inn, was all something being made up. He, and the Dutch guy, and the Dutch guy's father, they sit and made up the story".


Yep...you're right there ! There really are so MANY reasons to have filed charges, it just boggles the mind. KJ just doesn't have the love of justice in her belly, evidently... Kidnapping to begin with..the list goes on and on...and that lame excuse which was redundantly offered up on cable TV by the "Lovely Ms. Schipper" that we (American idiots) just didn't understand their 'system' was malarky...Charge the three dingbats with kidnapping for starters! Then the truth of what they did to Natalee will emerge, ( along with the names of their helpers )....Kidnapping is a very just accusation to bring against these three idiots.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #522 9/10 - 9/12/2006
Post by: Ono on September 11, 2006, 06:15:23 PM
Quote from: "Atlmetroguy"
Hey everybody who said hello!! I'm having a really rare slow afternoon with this new job..I've been a busy monkey!!


Hey Atlanta Metro Guy ! :D  Hope you're enjoying the new job.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #522 9/10 - 9/12/2006
Post by: Ono on September 11, 2006, 06:23:09 PM
Quote from: "NM"
Quote from: "Ono"
Quote from: "Ono"
Quote from: "the big hammer"
Deepak: Off the Reservation on 6/11

Deepak comes out w/ the beach drop-off story on 6/11 in his "suspect statement" -- breaking the party line on the HI story and "officially" goes off the reservation...

WHY?

After all, he has lied as a "witness" in a capital crime case, he has perjured himself and is open to numerous additional charges.  His attorney learns that there is no "relevant" jvds "witness" statement on 6/9. (And this TRUE, whether a jvds witness statement exists or not.) And within 48 hours, deepak is singing a completely different tune.

I believe deepak and his attorneys correctly surmised and deduced they were being set up.  And this would be wholly keeping w/ Paulus method of having a "plan B" if the arrest of the guards failed to produce desired outcome.  The longer k2 sticks with HI lie, the worse the perjury gets, the worse the potential obstruction charges get.


To protect himself and his brother, he goes off the reservation.  He tells the "truth" on 6/11 -- directly implicating jvds as last person w/ Natalee.  He does so because he is threatened and exposed.

The stated "IRRELEVANCE" of the jvd witness statement by k2 attorney is clear signal, during 6/9-6/11 w/ security guard/HI story collapsing, the sloots will try to pin k2, and their own FALSE WITNESS statements are Exhibit 1.


Makes total sense.  I am now thinking that those photos of Satish at the Sloot Compound pool party may actually have been taken way PRIOR to Joran's release, and only posted on the date of/right after his release for PR  appearances' sake?




 :shock: My comments were the third paragraph ! ?? :?

Edit - is this correct?


Hey Monks!!
Hi Hammer,
Check this out dk spills the HI is a lie and the pow-wow around the pool to Mikey sometime June9-10. when jurin finds out he panics and confesses to everything during the late hrs of June 10, the confession is reported then retracted in the press from June 10 11PM-June 11 1AM, then dk give the fish.hut story June11.

Hi Ono,
Linda posted on FP #67 of the dk 5-31 statement that those photos were taking before jurin was detained.


 :shock: Hi NM ! Haven't seen Linda's post yet!  Thanks for telling me ..have been gone all day ~ Wow! My instincts were right!  He also looked too 'un-stressed' for it to have been AFTER the events of the summer.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #522 9/10 - 9/12/2006
Post by: Buckeye on September 11, 2006, 06:23:16 PM
Talking of conspiracy and premeditation...

In Deepak's 6/29 statement he talks of making up things in the email to John Croes that Sunday night/Monday morning...because he thought they would check his computer.  If he only thought Joran was left on the beach..why would he think there would be an investigation?? Deepak knew something very bad happened that night..they were in cover up mode immediately.

You are telling me that John Charles CROES has stated that I wrote while I was chatting with him that I had written that the girl had put her hands in/down my pants, I can say the following. I did this to frustrate/mess up the investigation. I wanted to direct the focus of the police on myself and Joran because we were afraid that Satish would get the details wrong with regard to the "Holiday Inn" story. I was almost certain that our telephone conversations were being taped and I was certain that my computer was being monitored too. [/b]


Title: Lively Case Discussion #522 9/10 - 9/12/2006
Post by: Ono on September 11, 2006, 06:33:29 PM
Quote from: "NM"
Quote from: "klaasend"
NM - I know Linda said that about that photo but I don't believe her.  I don't think she really knows.  If you look at Flor, Joran and Freddy it looks like it was taken in September 2005 not way before, IMO.


Hey Klaas, Thank you!. I feel like you just pulled me up from a crack in the ground to hell! Thank you!

urgh! fooled again by a big aruba "people"!  This time b/c she is one of the few still around posting.  And seems congenial, which is their M.O.

I will repeat to myself 1,000 times. do not trust arubans, do not trust arubans.....

PS you mean Sept 2006

Sorry to my fellow Monkeys for spreading the bs. It was not intentional. Just stupid.


NM & KLASS: From my own humble artist's eyeball standpoint, Satish looks younger in those pool pictures and NOT having gone through the stress of the summer..Joran also appears younger to me...just my opinion...I'm saying six mos. prior maybe.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #522 9/10 - 9/12/2006
Post by: Buckeye on September 11, 2006, 06:36:24 PM
Quote from: "igsigs"
Something Bad Happened    6/11/05

It was unclear if the 6am arrest was related to the admission. The same team of officers who arrested five others in the case during the past week went to a home just outside Oranjestad, the capital, and came out with a handcuffed man who looked to be in his 20s.

http://www.totallydelco.com/062105.shtml

Who was arrested on this Saturday Anybody remember?


Found this:

The three men appeared in court Saturday and a judge determined that there was enough evidence to continue to hold them in custody.

Meanwhile, another report said a sixth man had been arrested in connection with the case, but later reports said that arrest had nothing to do with the Holloway disappearance.

http://crime.about.com/b/a/176635.htm


Title: Lively Case Discussion #522 9/10 - 9/12/2006
Post by: Ono on September 11, 2006, 06:37:53 PM
Quote from: "the big hammer"
deepak 6/11: The "truth" OR another cover story?

NM writes: "...Check this out dk spills the HI is a lie and the pow-wow around the pool to Mikey sometime June9-10. when jurin finds out he panics and confesses to everything during the late hrs of June 10, the confession is reported then retracted in the press from June 10 11PM-June 11 1AM, then dk give the fish.hut story June11..."


On 6/11, all of them are telling the beach drop off story.  Has everybody been brought back to the reservation OR is this a "Mexican" standoff?

Could be a little of both.

1.  Through false witness statement and perjury charges, k2 are in trouble based on their witness statements.  
2.  The false witness statements implicates k2 directly, maing them much more suspicious than jvds.
3.  jvds has not provided a "witness statement" and k2 lawyer says she has been told (by prosecution?) that jvds statement is not "relevant" and presumably not provided...
4.  See how guilty k2 looks at this stage?

But on 6/10 jvds confesses, and retracts, and on 6/11 everyone is saying the fisherman's huts and beach drop off story.

Maybe deepak said: "You are try to frame me, and I'm going to spill it all" panicking jvds, until Paulus came in as "cat wrangler" and got everyone back in the cage.  

And there it sits: a failed frame up of k2, but k2 w/ criminal behavior on record (perjury, obstruction, contempt, conspiracy) and knowledge of what happened (polis car tape) can put jvds on trial for murder.  

So no prosecution of k2. And no accurate "witness" statement (from k2) to nail the sloots.


Yes.. Paulus to the rescue as "cat wrangler"..right after Anita went in to survey the situation, return home and make a report ...remember Anita's first two visits with Joran ????? BEFORE Paulus...Then Paulus makes his move.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #522 9/10 - 9/12/2006
Post by: igsigs on September 11, 2006, 06:44:13 PM
Quote from: "Buckeye"
Talking of conspiracy and premeditation...

In Deepak's 6/29 statement he talks of making up things in the email to John Croes that Sunday night/Monday morning...because he thought they would check his computer.  If he only thought Joran was left on the beach..why would he think there would be an investigation?? Deepak knew something very bad happened that night..they were in cover up mode immediately.

You are telling me that John Charles CROES has stated that I wrote while I was chatting with him that I had written that the girl had put her hands in/down my pants, I can say the following. I did this to frustrate/mess up the investigation. I wanted to direct the focus of the police on myself and Joran because we were afraid that Satish would get the details wrong with regard to the "Holiday Inn" story. I was almost certain that our telephone conversations were being taped and I was certain that my computer was being monitored too. [/b]


Good find buckeye. I agree this shows conspiracy, but it looks like Deepak is referring to a Tuesday chat here. Am i reading it wrong?


Title: Lively Case Discussion #522 9/10 - 9/12/2006
Post by: Shizaru on September 11, 2006, 06:44:45 PM
Quote from: "Buckeye"
Talking of conspiracy and premeditation...

In Deepak's 6/29 statement he talks of making up things in the email to John Croes that Sunday night/Monday morning...because he thought they would check his computer.  If he only thought Joran was left on the beach..why would he think there would be an investigation?? Deepak knew something very bad happened that night..they were in cover up mode immediately.

You are telling me that John Charles CROES has stated that I wrote while I was chatting with him that I had written that the girl had put her hands in/down my pants, I can say the following. I did this to frustrate/mess up the investigation. I wanted to direct the focus of the police on myself and Joran because we were afraid that Satish would get the details wrong with regard to the "Holiday Inn" story. I was almost certain that our telephone conversations were being taped and I was certain that my computer was being monitored too. [/b]


It's vague but I think Deeapk was saying he made the hands in the pants comment to Croes during their Tuesday night chat. not Monday morning chat.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #522 9/10 - 9/12/2006
Post by: yapperz1 on September 11, 2006, 06:44:58 PM
Igs, not sure but wasn't 6-11-05 about the time Freddy & Lorenzo were supposedly taken in for questioning? Steve Croes was arrested around the 18th, IIRC


Title: Lively Case Discussion #522 9/10 - 9/12/2006
Post by: igsigs on September 11, 2006, 06:51:31 PM
Quote from: "yapperz1"
Igs, not sure but wasn't 6-11-05 about the time Freddy & Lorenzo were supposedly taken in for questioning? Steve Croes was arrested around the 18th, IIRC

Thanks yapperz. I really don't know when F&L were brought in. Buckeye found a good link denying that the arrestee was involved in the case, but i found the timing curious.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #522 9/10 - 9/12/2006
Post by: Buckeye on September 11, 2006, 07:02:38 PM
Quote from: "igsigs"
Quote from: "Buckeye"
Talking of conspiracy and premeditation...

In Deepak's 6/29 statement he talks of making up things in the email to John Croes that Sunday night/Monday morning...because he thought they would check his computer.  If he only thought Joran was left on the beach..why would he think there would be an investigation?? Deepak knew something very bad happened that night..they were in cover up mode immediately.

You are telling me that John Charles CROES has stated that I wrote while I was chatting with him that I had written that the girl had put her hands in/down my pants, I can say the following. I did this to frustrate/mess up the investigation. I wanted to direct the focus of the police on myself and Joran because we were afraid that Satish would get the details wrong with regard to the "Holiday Inn" story. I was almost certain that our telephone conversations were being taped and I was certain that my computer was being monitored too. [/b]


Good find buckeye. I agree this shows conspiracy, but it looks like Deepak is referring to a Tuesday chat here. Am i reading it wrong?


I just don't know...if he thought about the tapping earlier than what Joran told him (which was Tuesday) and he says J Croes told the police (because the Monday chats weren't available to read??) then I say he's referring to making up the early Mon am chat, the police seemed to have the Tues ones.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #522 9/10 - 9/12/2006
Post by: Buckeye on September 11, 2006, 07:05:05 PM
Quote from: "igsigs"
Quote from: "yapperz1"
Igs, not sure but wasn't 6-11-05 about the time Freddy & Lorenzo were supposedly taken in for questioning? Steve Croes was arrested around the 18th, IIRC

Thanks yapperz. I really don't know when F&L were brought in. Buckeye found a good link denying that the arrestee was involved in the case, but i found the timing curious.


Maybe it was Guido and he talked to Arlene and Arlene called the top notch lawyer and Guido took a trip to Holland.  The timing is curious...


Title: Lively Case Discussion #522 9/10 - 9/12/2006
Post by: oldfart on September 11, 2006, 07:08:00 PM
Quote from: "Shizaru"
Quote from: "Buckeye"
Talking of conspiracy and premeditation...

In Deepak's 6/29 statement he talks of making up things in the email to John Croes that Sunday night/Monday morning...because he thought they would check his computer.  If he only thought Joran was left on the beach..why would he think there would be an investigation?? Deepak knew something very bad happened that night..they were in cover up mode immediately.

You are telling me that John Charles CROES has stated that I wrote while I was chatting with him that I had written that the girl had put her hands in/down my pants, I can say the following. I did this to frustrate/mess up the investigation. I wanted to direct the focus of the police on myself and Joran because we were afraid that Satish would get the details wrong with regard to the "Holiday Inn" story. I was almost certain that our telephone conversations were being taped and I was certain that my computer was being monitored too. [/b]


It's vague but I think Deeapk was saying he made the hands in the pants comment to Croes during their Tuesday night chat. not Monday morning chat.

Shizaru  and Buckeye
I guess I missed / forgot this statement so I went reading the statement.
The next paragraph made me ask more questions

"On your question what made me think that the police would be monitoring our phones, I can say the following. I thought this might happen earlier and Joran had said the same thing to me on Tuesday May 31st 2005*. The purpose of the chat traffic was  to help the police and the Office of the DA with regard to the investigation so that they could see that I was indeed home in the night from Sunday to Monday. "

If he is talking about the Sunday / Monday that Natalee went missing this makes no since at all.  Why would he need them to think he was home if nothing happened.

And did anyone figure out why in the 5/31 statements, by the brothers, the Fisherman Huts is mentioned by the police?  
It's almost like the police 'PLANTED" that story in someone's minds?? :shock:

Oh... sorry    Hi.  MOnkeys :D


Title: Lively Case Discussion #522 9/10 - 9/12/2006
Post by: SunFreak2 on September 11, 2006, 07:14:09 PM
Quote from: "klaasend"
Excellent post by Mortella on the front page yesterday:

.....What on earth is in this for you and your brother to lie for Joran like this? He will pin the entire thing on you two in a heartbeat. Better tell the truth and put the blame where it belongs before it is too late and you and Deepak end up taking the fall for the Dutchie.


What was in it for Deepak & Satish?  The CYBERZONE CAFE.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #522 9/10 - 9/12/2006
Post by: oldfart on September 11, 2006, 07:14:45 PM
Spock
I agree with 100000000000000 % on the other charges.
I hope the Dutch can do something UNDER THEIR Leagal system about this.  and even add a few more..
Jorans drinking/gambling,  Pappa and Deepak for assisting and let us not to mention the establishments that were involved :twisted:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #522 9/10 - 9/12/2006
Post by: oldfart on September 11, 2006, 07:19:34 PM
forget...

I forgot the forget  :shock:  :?
"let us not FORGET to mention ..."


Title: Lively Case Discussion #522 9/10 - 9/12/2006
Post by: SunFreak2 on September 11, 2006, 07:19:39 PM
Quote from: "KatzHome"


I remembered your friend, SunFreak, and the cousin she lost 5 years ago on this day...  and remembered all who gave their lives...


Thanks for your prayers.  He was MY cousin, lost in the line of duty.  :(


Title: Lively Case Discussion #522 9/10 - 9/12/2006
Post by: oldfart on September 11, 2006, 07:27:52 PM
Just checked the weather radar...
Looks like we got some STUFF headed our way... :shock:

hope to BBL

SeeYaByeeeeeeeeeeee


Title: Lively Case Discussion #522 9/10 - 9/12/2006
Post by: Kat_Gram on September 11, 2006, 07:32:04 PM
Deepak is the one who made up the secuity guard story on the Monday night when the HT came to the VDS. They has the police in tow.
I did a FP post about the vacuuming of the car. He vacuums the car before C & C's and then, he vacuums the car again before the visit to the Bulbai police station because Joran got in the car and brought sand into the car. This was when Joran almost fell into the water.
A person can't fit in Andre's timeline or version of events in with Joran's recounting of the Monday night.  
With all the overtime and the many policemen they claim were working the case, did anyone ever read these first statements ?  
And we have not even heard about where Guido fits into this or what his story is. Or Freddy's.
When Joran is walking from the Racquet Club the Monday night going to meet Andre at the Wyndham for 8PM ( although he does say he went to the Aruba Grand  for 15 or do minutes ) he is following the same route Deepak took the night before on the way to the Marriott.
If they came in from a northerly direction going south from the lighthouse direction to the Marriott and the Club is east of the Marriott, how is this possible that he is on the same route ?


Title: Lively Case Discussion #522 9/10 - 9/12/2006
Post by: Anna on September 11, 2006, 07:39:20 PM
.
Kat Gram,
Maybe he's looking for something.  Maybe something they threw out of the car like a cup with Natalee's DNA on it and traces of GHB or something.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #522 9/10 - 9/12/2006
Post by: San on September 11, 2006, 07:39:52 PM
Is the statute of limitations for Kidnap & Rape charges in Aruba 2 years?  If so do you think they are trying to stall until the time period runs out?


Title: Lively Case Discussion #522 9/10 - 9/12/2006
Post by: NM on September 11, 2006, 07:41:53 PM
Quote from: "klaasend"
Quote from: "NM"
Quote from: "klaasend"
NM - I know Linda said that about that photo but I don't believe her.  I don't think she really knows.  If you look at Flor, Joran and Freddy it looks like it was taken in September 2005 not way before, IMO.


Hey Klaas, Thank you!. I feel like you just pulled me up from a crack in the ground to hell! Thank you!

urgh! fooled again by a big aruba "people"!  This time b/c she is one of the few still around posting.  And seems congenial, which is their M.O.

I will repeat to myself 1,000 times. do not trust arubans, do not trust arubans.....

PS you mean Sept 2006

Sorry to my fellow Monkeys for spreading the bs. It was not intentional. Just stupid.

No, I mean September 2005 when Joran was released from detention.


Sorry.  What was I thinking!?
I can only claim that yesterday I sustained a head injury, when my crazy golden, running at full speed, launched himself, all 4 way off the floor,  at me. It was full body contact w/ the 1st impact being his snout to the side of my head. Owwwch!  My head still hurts.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #522 9/10 - 9/12/2006
Post by: terryd270 on September 11, 2006, 07:50:33 PM
Klaasend,

I think you should find this funny but it seems that the meetup.com wants money for this tennis group.. I just got an email from a member and I guess they think I'm the captain or something and I need to pay the fee's..  I didn't even know there was a fee..  I just wanted to play tennis and now I'm glad I didn't start the bike club too..  I guess I should of realized that nothing is free..

Here is an email I just received:
" The problem exists that this has to be paid for or Meetup cancels the
group. How do we solve that issue? "


Title: Lively Case Discussion #522 9/10 - 9/12/2006
Post by: San on September 11, 2006, 07:51:47 PM
Quote from: "NM"

Sorry.  What was I thinking!?
I can only claim that yesterday I sustained a head injury, when my crazy golden, running at full speed, launched himself, all 4 way off the floor,  at me. It was full body contact w/ the 1st impact being his snout to the side of my head. Owwwch!  My head still hurts.

Ouch is right.  Hope you feel better.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #522 9/10 - 9/12/2006
Post by: Anna on September 11, 2006, 07:53:09 PM
.
Ever wonder if this refusal to investigate is in part fueled by greed on the part of ALE?  Recall the first words Dennis Jacobs spoke to Dave Holloway being "How much MONEY do you have?" as though that is what the investigation was predicated upon.

Then later we have Gerald "Mercedes" Dompig saying he is going to question Beth about the trust fund except he is calling it the Emergency Fund.  He is wanting to know why that money wasn't used to pay Aruban expenses in all of this. And seems to think it is some of his business, a sentiment I do not share with him.

Then there is no money to pay for all the over time and they have spent one-fourth of their entire budget on this one case.  Evidently, they think that the trust fund can just be dished out to them for whatever.  It took Joe Mammana to get the reward amount high enough to garner world attention.  I do not think anywhere near the money Dompig seems to think ever came into the trust.  I believe long ago we saw the amount of $25 million being bandied about mostly in Aruba of course.

I'd guess without Mammana's reward money, several thousand dollars were collected and much of that has gone to pay attorneys, etc. just as specified when the trust was set up.  It was never stipulated that the money was to pay ALE for overtime or the Aruban government for doing their job.

But I still think I saw a lot of resentment over that money.  It seemed that ALE thought it was for them as much as for Natalee's family and I believe they overestimated the amount drastically.  There is an article where Dompig explains his need for an accounting of this money at ArubaGetagrip's website which I brought over not long ago.

And remember the ALE were already angry and threatening a walk out or whatever when Natalee disappeared.  I do think this is some element in their refusal to perform their duties in even close to a normal professional manner.  Talk about money-grubbing!  But I do think they had the mistaken impression that they should have had access to money donated to the trust fund instead of Natalee's family only.  

Just my thoughts looking back on several things said at different times in this regard.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #522 9/10 - 9/12/2006
Post by: klaasend on September 11, 2006, 07:54:50 PM
O/T - this Nassau newspaper has a little more information regarding the death of Anna Nicole's son:

http://www.thenassauguardian.com/national_local/41348138042629.php
(snipped)
Daniel Smith, son of the model and actress, reportedly suffered a "massive heart attack" on the maternity ward in Doctors Hospital, sources revealed. Police officials were tight-lipped about the incident and would not confirm nor deny the identity of the deceased
(snipped)


Title: Lively Case Discussion #522 9/10 - 9/12/2006
Post by: memphis on September 11, 2006, 07:55:13 PM
'evening monkeys!

Some big storms are coming across the river towards me, but the good thing is that they're bringing cooler weather. Yeah!!

NM ~ gotta love those big, 4-legged goofs!  :D

Anna ~ you can steal my graphics anytime.  :D  What are you collecting? I've got some other animated ones.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #522 9/10 - 9/12/2006
Post by: igsigs on September 11, 2006, 07:58:11 PM
Quote from: "Buckeye"

Maybe it was Guido and he talked to Arlene and Arlene called the top notch lawyer and Guido took a trip to Holland.  The timing is curious...

Curiosity abounds on 6/10. I see the possibility that Joran implicated someone in his "confession" that either personally, or through connections was not deemed investigatable.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #522 9/10 - 9/12/2006
Post by: NM on September 11, 2006, 08:00:58 PM
Quote from: "Ono"


 :shock: Hi NM ! Haven't seen Linda's post yet!  Thanks for telling me ..have been gone all day ~ Wow! My instincts were right!  He also looked too 'un-stressed' for it to have been AFTER the events of the summer.


Hi Ono,
Did you see Klaas's reply to mine.
I totally forgot that Big "people" lie from certain islands, starting and ending w/ the letter A.

jurin looks so relaxed Sept 05 b/c his detention was spent in a spa! :lol:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #522 9/10 - 9/12/2006
Post by: Anna on September 11, 2006, 08:02:10 PM
Quote from: "oldfart"
[Shizaru  and Buckeye
I guess I missed / forgot this statement so I went reading the statement.
The next paragraph made me ask more questions

"On your question what made me think that the police would be monitoring our phones, I can say the following. I thought this might happen earlier and Joran had said the same thing to me on Tuesday May 31st 2005*. The purpose of the chat traffic was  to help the police and the Office of the DA with regard to the investigation so that they could see that I was indeed home in the night from Sunday to Monday. "

If he is talking about the Sunday / Monday that Natalee went missing this makes no since at all.  Why would he need them to think he was home if nothing happened.

And did anyone figure out why in the 5/31 statements, by the brothers, the Fisherman Huts is mentioned by the police?  
It's almost like the police 'PLANTED" that story in someone's minds?? :shock:

Oh... sorry    Hi.  MOnkeys :D



That is exactly right, OF.  Furthermore, it is in one of Joran's statements as well that he and Deepak agreed to lots of chatter and messages to show when they were finally home.  But it makes perfect sense if you know something bad happened.  

Now why on earth would they be agreeing to lots of chit chat back and forth the night Natalee disappeared if they just dropped her off at the HI or even if they left her on the beach?

Of course, ALE seems to find nothing odd about this whatsoever as we see no follow up questions immediately.  Had they done this twenty times before and if so, why?  Or if not so, what was different about this time that necessitated a lot of chatter back and forth between the two as they plotted to do?


Title: Lively Case Discussion #522 9/10 - 9/12/2006
Post by: Buckeye on September 11, 2006, 08:03:04 PM
Since they didn't investigate or follow up the big three...who kept refusing to talk and sign statements....my guess is the police overtime went into following the family members to make sure the ATA goals were achieved. Their gripe over money and the budget should be at ATA and they should bill them.  Investigators don't want the  family to pay for the investigation...that's a little bit of a conflict...so, this police force does not have investigators... they have PR enforcers.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #522 9/10 - 9/12/2006
Post by: Buckeye on September 11, 2006, 08:04:28 PM
Quote from: "igsigs"
Quote from: "Buckeye"

Maybe it was Guido and he talked to Arlene and Arlene called the top notch lawyer and Guido took a trip to Holland.  The timing is curious...

Curiosity abounds on 6/10. I see the possibility that Joran implicated someone in his "confession" that either personally, or through connections was not deemed investigatable.


Bingo


Title: Lively Case Discussion #522 9/10 - 9/12/2006
Post by: klaasend on September 11, 2006, 08:06:48 PM
Quote from: "Buckeye"
Quote from: "igsigs"
Quote from: "Buckeye"

Maybe it was Guido and he talked to Arlene and Arlene called the top notch lawyer and Guido took a trip to Holland.  The timing is curious...

Curiosity abounds on 6/10. I see the possibility that Joran implicated someone in his "confession" that either personally, or through connections was not deemed investigatable.


Bingo

Lorenzo?  Paulus?


Title: Lively Case Discussion #522 9/10 - 9/12/2006
Post by: Buckeye on September 11, 2006, 08:09:22 PM
Quote from: "klaasend"
Quote from: "Buckeye"
Quote from: "igsigs"
Quote from: "Buckeye"

Maybe it was Guido and he talked to Arlene and Arlene called the top notch lawyer and Guido took a trip to Holland.  The timing is curious...

Curiosity abounds on 6/10. I see the possibility that Joran implicated someone in his "confession" that either personally, or through connections was not deemed investigatable.


Bingo

Lorenzo?  Paulus?


Early reports were 20 some year old, handcuffed...so even though Paulus thinks he's 20, I'd rule hime out...Maybe Lorenzo or Guido??


Title: Lively Case Discussion #522 9/10 - 9/12/2006
Post by: Buckeye on September 11, 2006, 08:10:04 PM
Quote from: "klaasend"
O/T - this Nassau newspaper has a little more information regarding the death of Anna Nicole's son:

http://www.thenassauguardian.com/national_local/41348138042629.php
(snipped)
Daniel Smith, son of the model and actress, reportedly suffered a "massive heart attack" on the maternity ward in Doctors Hospital, sources revealed. Police officials were tight-lipped about the incident and would not confirm nor deny the identity of the deceased
(snipped)


Was he into cocaine??


Title: Lively Case Discussion #522 9/10 - 9/12/2006
Post by: Anna on September 11, 2006, 08:10:36 PM
Memphis,
I just collect any avatars or even photos that I run across that I think are cute like yours.    :D I don't know why.  Mostly dogs and puppies and do use them on printed stuff for my puppies sometimes but mostly I just like them.  Have kitties, etc. too.

Guess I will go watch the speech and rest of the 9/11 coverage although it is depressing I do want to remember and be respectful of those who lost their lives that day and those who died trying to save them.

Just no way is today a good day in this country but we should be thankful for the death toll being as low as it was for some early reports were saying the towers could easily have 50,000 people in them.  And also to be thankful for is that the recent plot of ten aircraft being blown up was thwarted so once again America is blessed.  Also I am grateful to Margaret Thatcher for making this trip in her fragile and aged condition to show her respect.  We are blessed to have had such a friend as she.  And Tony Blair.

God does Bless America.  Of this I have no doubt.


.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #522 9/10 - 9/12/2006
Post by: klaasend on September 11, 2006, 08:12:29 PM
Quote from: "Buckeye"
Quote from: "klaasend"
Quote from: "Buckeye"
Quote from: "igsigs"
Quote from: "Buckeye"

Maybe it was Guido and he talked to Arlene and Arlene called the top notch lawyer and Guido took a trip to Holland.  The timing is curious...

Curiosity abounds on 6/10. I see the possibility that Joran implicated someone in his "confession" that either personally, or through connections was not deemed investigatable.


Bingo

Lorenzo?  Paulus?


Early reports were 20 some year old, handcuffed...so even though Paulus thinks he's 20, I'd rule hime out...Maybe Lorenzo or Guido??

Reports were that Lorenzo was brought in for questioning a couple times very early on.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #522 9/10 - 9/12/2006
Post by: igsigs on September 11, 2006, 08:12:48 PM
Quote from: "klaasend"

So, does GLENDA/BONDIA/JULIA work for ATA?  Guess that answers alot of questions!  :wink:

How did i miss this? Renfro is now posting e-mails from the  :arrow: Aruban Tourism Association?

007 she is not  :lol:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #522 9/10 - 9/12/2006
Post by: Kat_Gram on September 11, 2006, 08:14:54 PM
And yet another inconsistency :
Charlie Croes says they left the police station that Monday ( at Noord )night at 2:45 about to go to the Sloots. It's very close. Remember that Paulus does not answer the door for 15 to 20 minutes. So, the initial " meeting " is a 3 am.
Deepak and Joran are in the parking lot going back to the Wyndham. Andre and Guido have left . This is at 2 am. They get a call from Paulus saying that there are ppl at the door,,, blah blah blah..
So, where were they when the call came ?
There is one hour here.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #522 9/10 - 9/12/2006
Post by: Lala'sMom on September 11, 2006, 08:27:01 PM
Quote from: "Buckeye"
Quote from: "igsigs"
Quote from: "Buckeye"

Maybe it was Guido and he talked to Arlene and Arlene called the top notch lawyer and Guido took a trip to Holland.  The timing is curious...

Curiosity abounds on 6/10. I see the possibility that Joran implicated someone in his "confession" that either personally, or through connections was not deemed investigatable.


Bingo


That would be our infamous Lorenzo.  It was stated he was questioned but nothing else was ever mentioned.  He simply disappeared from the radar screen as quickly as he appeared. Also remember Shango said "he couldn't be touched".

Evening Monkeys, hope everyone is well.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #522 9/10 - 9/12/2006
Post by: Lala'sMom on September 11, 2006, 08:37:29 PM
Okay, where is everyone?  I didn't mean to mention Shango...it just happened....really it did.  :roll:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #522 9/10 - 9/12/2006
Post by: mrs. red on September 11, 2006, 08:40:42 PM
Quote from: "Lala'sMom"
Okay, where is everyone?  I didn't mean to mention Shango...it just happened....really it did.  :roll:


Hi Lala's... I just wanted to peek in.... I am watching the 911 movie.... it's hard to watch, knowing that the officals in Portland, ME wanted to turn the terrorists around but they were too worrried about offending a Saudi to follow through......


Title: Lively Case Discussion #522 9/10 - 9/12/2006
Post by: memphis on September 11, 2006, 08:41:51 PM
So, within 24 hours of being arrested, they have Joran blabbering and implicating others, who seem to be extremely protected and untouchable, and confessing to murder.   :shock:

There's been lots of heavy thinking here in the last 24 hours or so. I'm still trying to absorb the thoughts.

Hi Lala'sMom!


Title: Lively Case Discussion #522 9/10 - 9/12/2006
Post by: mrs. red on September 11, 2006, 08:42:47 PM
Watching all the grief that John O'Neill et. al went through gives me such a new respect for our intelligence community - I always respected them, but now it's so much more!!

It also shows just how freaking fanantical these guys are...


Title: Lively Case Discussion #522 9/10 - 9/12/2006
Post by: mrs. red on September 11, 2006, 08:44:26 PM
Ok... I am out of here for tonight...

y'all keep up the good work...

Keep the faith Monkeys...


Title: Lively Case Discussion #522 9/10 - 9/12/2006
Post by: Lala'sMom on September 11, 2006, 08:45:16 PM
Hi Mrs. Red and Memphis.  That movie is hard to keep up with because of no commercials.  One trip to the bathroom and you are lost. My DH is glued to the TV watching it. I have seen bits and pieces of it.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #522 9/10 - 9/12/2006
Post by: San on September 11, 2006, 08:46:43 PM
Quote from: "igsigs"
Quote from: "Buckeye"

Maybe it was Guido and he talked to Arlene and Arlene called the top notch lawyer and Guido took a trip to Holland.  The timing is curious...

Curiosity abounds on 6/10. I see the possibility that Joran implicated someone in his "confession" that either personally, or through connections was not deemed investigatable.

This is what I believe.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #522 9/10 - 9/12/2006
Post by: Lala'sMom on September 11, 2006, 08:47:56 PM
I am a bit confused about the HI story and just exactly when and who started the  story.  Would someone make an attempt to straighten me out?  I would so appreciate it. TIA


Title: Lively Case Discussion #522 9/10 - 9/12/2006
Post by: yapperz1 on September 11, 2006, 08:48:02 PM
Hiya Monkeys

Maybe Joran told them they went to a party @ Lorenzo's house???


Title: Lively Case Discussion #522 9/10 - 9/12/2006
Post by: mrs. red on September 11, 2006, 08:48:31 PM
Quote from: "Lala'sMom"
Hi Mrs. Red and Memphis.  That movie is hard to keep up with because of no commercials.  One trip to the bathroom and you are lost. My DH is glued to the TV watching it. I have seen bits and pieces of it.


It's hard to watch seeing how we had so many chances for this not to happen but the "little" guy wasn't listened to.... so many ppl in the field tried so hard to get the higher ups to listen and do something....

Not only that but politics  - Clinton, Bush, they both just didn't seem to get it... especially Clinton.... sorry if that offends anyone... but this began in 1993... and escalated....


Title: Lively Case Discussion #522 9/10 - 9/12/2006
Post by: Kat_Gram on September 11, 2006, 08:49:19 PM
If the Dutch police have access to all the cell calls made, even those made and received by Joran, they could see where the call was received ? If the Aruba police had already looked at that, then, I am making an assumption here that it would triangulate to the area that could be the Radisson parking lot OR another location in the same range. The huts are further north so I am going to make another assumption that they were not at the huts when the call from Paulus came in.  This is beyond anything I could do here without technical assistance regarding where those cell phone towers are and when does it switch from one to the other tower ?  
... As for Julia .... Is anyone surprised ? .. I wouldn't be surprised if Medley R. is being paid... she spends 24/7 posting and spewing..
..
When I think of them, did anyone see One Flew Over the Cuckoo's Nest.
the easliy led and crazier than a sh*thouse rats.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #522 9/10 - 9/12/2006
Post by: San on September 11, 2006, 08:50:21 PM
Quote from: "klaasend"

Reports were that Lorenzo was brought in for questioning a couple times very early on.

I never knew he was brought in a couple of times.  But then again I could remember his last name the other night.

Who was the guy that was brought in for questioning and was crying like a baby.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #522 9/10 - 9/12/2006
Post by: mrs. red on September 11, 2006, 08:53:06 PM
Quote from: "San"
Quote from: "klaasend"

Reports were that Lorenzo was brought in for questioning a couple times very early on.

I never knew he was brought in a couple of times.  But then again I could remember his last name the other night.

Who was the guy that was brought in for questioning and was crying like a baby.


GVC... and Koen just was too scared to go in questioning.... they sent his younger brother instead...


Title: Lively Case Discussion #522 9/10 - 9/12/2006
Post by: San on September 11, 2006, 08:54:48 PM
Quote from: "mrs. red"
Quote from: "San"
Quote from: "klaasend"

Reports were that Lorenzo was brought in for questioning a couple times very early on.

I never knew he was brought in a couple of times.  But then again I could remember his last name the other night.

Who was the guy that was brought in for questioning and was crying like a baby.


GVC... and Koen just was too scared to go in questioning.... they sent his younger brother instead...

Hi mrs. red,

I don't think it was GVC or Koen.  This was said early last summer buy an Aruban poster I believe.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #522 9/10 - 9/12/2006
Post by: mrs. red on September 11, 2006, 08:56:13 PM
then maybe it was Satish?


Title: Lively Case Discussion #522 9/10 - 9/12/2006
Post by: mrs. red on September 11, 2006, 08:57:11 PM
Ok Monkeys... I am really out of here...

keep the great work up....

and keep the faith...


Title: Lively Case Discussion #522 9/10 - 9/12/2006
Post by: Kat_Gram on September 11, 2006, 08:58:00 PM
George W. Bush is addressing the nation.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #522 9/10 - 9/12/2006
Post by: memphis on September 11, 2006, 09:04:27 PM
Quote from: "Lala'sMom"
Hi Mrs. Red and Memphis.  That movie is hard to keep up with because of no commercials.  One trip to the bathroom and you are lost. My DH is glued to the TV watching it. I have seen bits and pieces of it.


 :lol:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #522 9/10 - 9/12/2006
Post by: Lala'sMom on September 11, 2006, 09:08:26 PM
Memphis
Who do you think this mystery witness/suspect could be?


Title: Lively Case Discussion #522 9/10 - 9/12/2006
Post by: memphis on September 11, 2006, 09:12:08 PM
Quote from: "Lala'sMom"
Memphis
Who do you think this mystery witness/suspect could be?


I think I'm with Klaasend on Lorenzo, and maybe Guido.

Have you been reading some of the theories since last night?


Title: Lively Case Discussion #522 9/10 - 9/12/2006
Post by: memphis on September 11, 2006, 09:13:24 PM
Quote from: "memphis"
Quote from: "Lala'sMom"
Memphis
Who do you think this mystery witness/suspect could be?


I think I'm with Klaasend on Lorenzo, and maybe Guido.

Have you been reading some of the theories since last night?


I mean since yesterday morning.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #522 9/10 - 9/12/2006
Post by: memphis on September 11, 2006, 09:17:37 PM
Quote from: "SunFreak2"
Quote from: "the big hammer"
Deepak: Off the Reservation on 6/11

Deepak comes out w/ the beach drop-off story on 6/11 in his "suspect statement" -- breaking the party line on the HI story and "officially" goes off the reservation...

WHY?

After all, he has lied as a "witness" in a capital crime case, he has perjured himself and is open to numerous additional charges.  His attorney learns that there is no "relevant" jvds "witness" statement on 6/9. (And this TRUE, whether a jvds witness statement exists or not.) And within 48 hours, deepak is singing a completely different tune.

I believe deepak and his attorneys correctly surmised and deduced they were being set up.  And this would be wholly keeping w/ Paulus method of having a "plan B" if the arrest of the guards failed to produce desired outcome.  The longer k2 sticks with HI lie, the worse the perjury gets, the worse the potential obstruction charges get.

To protect himself and his brother, he goes off the reservation.  He tells the "truth" on 6/11 -- directly implicating jvds as last person w/ Natalee.  He does so because he is threatened and exposed.

The stated "IRRELEVANCE" of the jvd witness statement by k2 attorney is clear signal, during 6/9-6/11 w/ security guard/HI story collapsing, the sloots will try to pin k2, and their own FALSE WITNESS statements are Exhibit 1.


So if there was a 6/10 confession, we can assume it wasn't Deepak's if he changes his story on 6/11 to distance himself from the HI lies.  Or maybe it is to back Joran's 2nd set of lies about the FH's to keep the heat away from the real site of the crime.


Here's one from Hammer.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #522 9/10 - 9/12/2006
Post by: Lala'sMom on September 11, 2006, 09:24:36 PM
Yes, I have and some great work going on in here.  I have long held the belief that there is more going on here than just Joran.  I also think that is what was being alluded to by Shango.  Thus the cryptic verses that confound and confuse everyone.  BTW I meant to way Shango that time...I really did.  :wink:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #522 9/10 - 9/12/2006
Post by: robots on September 11, 2006, 09:28:26 PM
Quote from: "Kat_Gram"
If the Dutch police have access to all the cell calls made, even those made and received by Joran, they could see where the call was received ? If the Aruba police had already looked at that, then, I am making an assumption here that it would triangulate to the area that could be the Radisson parking lot OR another location in the same range. The huts are further north so I am going to make another assumption that they were not at the huts when the call from Paulus came in.  This is beyond anything I could do here without technical assistance regarding where those cell phone towers are and when does it switch from one to the other tower ?  
... As for Julia .... Is anyone surprised ? .. I wouldn't be surprised if Medley R. is being paid... she spends 24/7 posting and spewing..
..
When I think of them, did anyone see One Flew Over the Cuckoo's Nest.
the easliy led and crazier than a sh*thouse rats.



ROBOTS -words of wisdom for tonight

pigs get fat
hogs get slaughtered
and sheep get driven off a CLIFF

i told tell my kids and i tell them frequently  
"NO SHEEP ALLOWED around here"

seriously considering puttting up a sign at the FRONT ENTRANCE to the
driveway  :twisted:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #522 9/10 - 9/12/2006
Post by: robots on September 11, 2006, 09:28:55 PM
refro is a SHEEP  8)


Title: Lively Case Discussion #522 9/10 - 9/12/2006
Post by: robots on September 11, 2006, 09:30:08 PM
or whatever her stupid name is  8)  :twisted:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #522 9/10 - 9/12/2006
Post by: memphis on September 11, 2006, 09:32:30 PM
Ya know, I try to think it's the simple scenario of date rape gone bad. I really do, but then, I just can't get my mind around how everything could be so blantantly covered up just for one Dutch kid. Aruba has done some fantastic and unbelievable things to make this whole thing disappear. I just don't understand how there could not be one honest cop to step forward. Everyone is silenced. Everyone is terribly afraid. WHY? Why are that so afraid if it is just one (or three) kid(s) who are responsible.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #522 9/10 - 9/12/2006
Post by: memphis on September 11, 2006, 09:34:11 PM
Quote from: "Lala'sMom"
Yes, I have and some great work going on in here.  I have long held the belief that there is more going on here than just Joran.  I also think that is what was being alluded to by Shango.  Thus the cryptic verses that confound and confuse everyone.  BTW I meant to way Shango that time...I really did.  :wink:


And we know that kinda stuff is going on.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #522 9/10 - 9/12/2006
Post by: San on September 11, 2006, 09:38:00 PM
Quote from: "memphis"
Ya know, I try to think it's the simple scenario of date rape gone bad. I really do, but then, I just can't get my mind around how everything could be so blantantly covered up just for one Dutch kid. Aruba has done some fantastic and unbelievable things to make this whole thing disappear. I just don't understand how there could not be one honest cop to step forward. Everyone is silenced. Everyone is terribly afraid. WHY? Why are that so afraid if it is just one (or three) kid(s) who are responsible.

I remember very early on I was watching the fox morning show and they were talking to an investigator who had a lot of experience on the islands.  I believe his first name was Gil and what he said was they will never prosecute these kids.  I thought to myself how can that be.  Well over a year later he is right.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #522 9/10 - 9/12/2006
Post by: memphis on September 11, 2006, 09:39:23 PM
This makes me afraid. Evil Evil Evil!

Quote from: "sb"
2 other deep, mysterious tidbits from that night still haunt me to this day, and they have IMO never been adequately discussed. Anyone remember the following 2 facts/rumors/opinions?

1. The report of 2 men dragging a hysterical female into a car in the N part of the hotel strip area.

2. The forum post where someone addressed Joran and asked about his "3:45 AM boat ride".

We are digging deep into the fateful night... why don't we bring these up as well?


I can't find the post, but someone was asking why the story of the 2 men in black. Where did it come from and was there some grain of truth in it.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #522 9/10 - 9/12/2006
Post by: sb on September 11, 2006, 09:57:14 PM
Memphis, those were the 2 things that were said in the early days thet really raised my radar. Both alluded to some dark truth about that night, but very little- almost nothing- has ever come of them.

At one time it was thought that the woman who saw the screaming scenario, was the wife of the guy who got hacked to death with a machete there in June. That turned out not to be.

If this thing was just about the 3 guys, the island would have LONG since cut their losses, served up the 3 perps on some minor thing, and tried to move on. Instead they have stonewalled.

I am convinced there are some in Aruba who are so deluded and ignorant that they believe Natalee never even existed in the first place, that it's all a plot of the Ugly Americans to smear their little pile of rocks in the middle of the ocean.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #522 9/10 - 9/12/2006
Post by: AZSunny on September 11, 2006, 10:04:18 PM
I just received the latest copy of Cruise Travel Magazine.  There is a backpage cover featuring "Aruba...only the best"


It lists as the attractions: sunny beaches, world class shopping and water sports, to rugged natural sights and the  most friendly people anywhere.  it also says that nothing compares to Aruba.  Well they were right about that!  :roll:

 It is posted by the Aruba cruise tourism, and the Government of Aruba.  list telephone and fax number:  phone 297-583-3648 and the fax as 297-583-5088. They also list the email as www.Arubabycruise.com as their website.  [/i]


Title: Lively Case Discussion #522 9/10 - 9/12/2006
Post by: mrs. red on September 11, 2006, 10:08:44 PM
Quote from: "AZSunny"
I just received the latest copy of Cruise Travel Magazine.  There is a backpage cover featuring "Aruba...only the best"


It lists as the attractions: sunny beaches, world class shopping and water sports, to rugged natural sights and the  most friendly people anywhere.  it also says that nothing compares to Aruba.  Well they were right about that!  :roll:

 It is posted by the Aruba cruise tourism, and the Government of Aruba.  list telephone and fax number:  phone 297-583-3648 and the fax as 297-583-5088. They also list the email as www.Arubabycruise.com as their website.  [/i]


AzSunny - Did you see the post from Sue earlier today with the empty beaches?


O/T... San, I am so happy you took a vacation that week...


Title: Lively Case Discussion #522 9/10 - 9/12/2006
Post by: Hotshot on September 11, 2006, 10:09:47 PM
You guys have to see one of the newer movies the Deciples put out.  Sure people don't carry guns in aruba.  There are more here like, go to church and stuff that needs to be seen before they pull them.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4F5bihsB2ws&mode=related&search=


Title: Lively Case Discussion #522 9/10 - 9/12/2006
Post by: Lala'sMom on September 11, 2006, 10:13:57 PM
Quote from: "memphis"
This makes me afraid. Evil Evil Evil!

Quote from: "sb"
2 other deep, mysterious tidbits from that night still haunt me to this day, and they have IMO never been adequately discussed. Anyone remember the following 2 facts/rumors/opinions?

1. The report of 2 men dragging a hysterical female into a car in the N part of the hotel strip area.

2. The forum post where someone addressed Joran and asked about his "3:45 AM boat ride".

We are digging deep into the fateful night... why don't we bring these up as well?


Good question.  Does anyone know anything about the so called boat ride?  How does that fit into the timeline and things that we do know during that time? Any ideas?

I can't find the post, but someone was asking why the story of the 2 men in black. Where did it come from and was there some grain of truth in it.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #522 9/10 - 9/12/2006
Post by: San on September 11, 2006, 10:14:16 PM
Quote from: "mrs. red"
Quote from: "AZSunny"
I just received the latest copy of Cruise Travel Magazine.  There is a backpage cover featuring "Aruba...only the best"


It lists as the attractions: sunny beaches, world class shopping and water sports, to rugged natural sights and the  most friendly people anywhere.  it also says that nothing compares to Aruba.  Well they were right about that!  :roll:

 It is posted by the Aruba cruise tourism, and the Government of Aruba.  list telephone and fax number:  phone 297-583-3648 and the fax as 297-583-5088. They also list the email as www.Arubabycruise.com as their website.  [/i]


AzSunny - Did you see the post from Sue earlier today with the empty beaches?


O/T... San, I am so happy you took a vacation that week...

Thank you mrs. red.  I am happy also.  Funny thing about it is that I always used to take my vacation in August.  That was the first time I took it in September.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #522 9/10 - 9/12/2006
Post by: klaasend on September 11, 2006, 10:14:55 PM
Quote from: "Hotshot"
You guys have to see one of the newer movies the Deciples put out.  Sure people don't carry guns in aruba.  There are more here like, go to church and stuff that needs to be seen before they pull them.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4F5bihsB2ws&mode=related&search=

Why are you saying it's the DDD?


Title: Lively Case Discussion #522 9/10 - 9/12/2006
Post by: Lala'sMom on September 11, 2006, 10:16:33 PM
Sorry about messing up that post.  That should teach me to preview before hitting submit.  :oops:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #522 9/10 - 9/12/2006
Post by: mrs. red on September 11, 2006, 10:17:39 PM
Quote from: "San"
Quote from: "mrs. red"
Quote from: "AZSunny"
I just received the latest copy of Cruise Travel Magazine.  There is a backpage cover featuring "Aruba...only the best"


It lists as the attractions: sunny beaches, world class shopping and water sports, to rugged natural sights and the  most friendly people anywhere.  it also says that nothing compares to Aruba.  Well they were right about that!  :roll:

 It is posted by the Aruba cruise tourism, and the Government of Aruba.  list telephone and fax number:  phone 297-583-3648 and the fax as 297-583-5088. They also list the email as www.Arubabycruise.com as their website.  [/i]


AzSunny - Did you see the post from Sue earlier today with the empty beaches?


O/T... San, I am so happy you took a vacation that week...

Thank you mrs. red.  I am happy also.  Funny thing about it is that I always used to take my vacation in August.  That was the first time I took it in September.

(hugs to you)... I am going to get out of here for now, I will be back tomorrow and I promise to be on topic... good night monkeys... say some extra prayers tonight!


Title: Lively Case Discussion #522 9/10 - 9/12/2006
Post by: Hotshot on September 11, 2006, 10:18:13 PM
Quote from: "klaasend"
Quote from: "Hotshot"
You guys have to see one of the newer movies the Deciples put out.  Sure people don't carry guns in aruba.  There are more here like, go to church and stuff that needs to be seen before they pull them.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4F5bihsB2ws&mode=related&search=

Why are you saying it's the DDD?

The original videos are there, or some of them, then it looks like friends of his had him upload more....I started here.
http://www.youtube.com/profile?user=dsp360420


Title: Lively Case Discussion #522 9/10 - 9/12/2006
Post by: AZSunny on September 11, 2006, 10:19:42 PM
Quote from: "mrs. red"
Quote from: "AZSunny"
I just received the latest copy of Cruise Travel Magazine.  There is a backpage cover featuring "Aruba...only the best"


It lists as the attractions: sunny beaches, world class shopping and water sports, to rugged natural sights and the  most friendly people anywhere.  it also says that nothing compares to Aruba.  Well they were right about that!  :roll:

 It is posted by the Aruba cruise tourism, and the Government of Aruba.  list telephone and fax number:  phone 297-583-3648 and the fax as 297-583-5088. They also list the email as www.Arubabycruise.com as their website.  [/i]


AzSunny - Did you see the post from Sue earlier today with the empty beaches?


O/T... San, I am so happy you took a vacation that week...


check out this post at the link provided.  
ACCP Annual Meeting Promoting Visitor Safety & Security

 

Aruba June 2006 – The Association of Caribbean Commissioners of Police (ACCP) held the Annual general Meeting & Conference in Aruba, during May 25-31, 2006.

The focus of the meeting was Promoting Visitor Safety & Security, where various speakers were invited to share their expertise on how to ensure the safety and security of each visitor.

Among the Speakers were Captain Howard A. Newhoff of Royal Caribbean International & Celebrity Cruises, Chiefs of Police, F.B.I., Lawyers, Professor of Radford University, and other guests related to the topic.

The Staff or Aruba Cruise Tourism also attended this interesting conference and gained knowledge of the challenges and the approach towards safety & security of visitors in general.

This conference also served its purpose to liaise, network and to establish a plan of action.

Have the best practices in place to address media relations, to build and maintain.

The Members of the ACCP are the Police Commissioners of Anguila, Antigua & Barbuda, Aruba, Bahamas, Barbados, Belize, Bermuda, British Virgin Islands, Cayman Islands, Curacao, Dominica, French Antilles, Grenada, Guyana, Jamaica, Montserrat, St. Kitts & Nevis, St. Lucia, St. Maarten, St. Vincent & Grenadines, Suriname, Trinidad & Tobago, Turks & Caicos Islands, and US Virgin Islands.

 


Title: Lively Case Discussion #522 9/10 - 9/12/2006
Post by: klaasend on September 11, 2006, 10:23:28 PM
Quote from: "Hotshot"
Quote from: "klaasend"
Quote from: "Hotshot"
You guys have to see one of the newer movies the Deciples put out.  Sure people don't carry guns in aruba.  There are more here like, go to church and stuff that needs to be seen before they pull them.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4F5bihsB2ws&mode=related&search=

Why are you saying it's the DDD?

The original videos are there, or some of them, then it looks like friends of his had him upload more....I started here.
http://www.youtube.com/profile?user=dsp360420

Sorry Hotshot, I'm not following you.  The first link you posted doesn't have anything to do with the DDD as far as I can tell.  Yes, I see some of the originals are still there.  I don't see where more have been uploaded by him.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #522 9/10 - 9/12/2006
Post by: oldfart on September 11, 2006, 10:23:34 PM
Quote from: "Lala'sMom"
Sorry about messing up that post.  That should teach me to preview before hitting submit.  :oops:


I guess I can let it go  "This Time" ~~ provided you publish the entry you make in THE BOOK  for it!  
If Not will have to see if I can get SAN to start "carrying" in the cage again and as to borrow :roll: :wink:   :lol:
Hi Monkeys    :D


Title: Lively Case Discussion #522 9/10 - 9/12/2006
Post by: San on September 11, 2006, 10:26:11 PM
Quote from: "oldfart"
Quote from: "Lala'sMom"
Sorry about messing up that post.  That should teach me to preview before hitting submit.  :oops:


I guess I can let it go  "This Time" ~~ provided you publish the entry you make in THE BOOK  for it!  
If Not will have to see if I can get SAN to start "carrying" in the cage again and as to borrow :roll: :wink:   :lol:
Hi Monkeys    :D

Did someone say carrying(http://i34.photobucket.com/albums/d118/Sanddrops/gun1.gif) :lol:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #522 9/10 - 9/12/2006
Post by: BTgirl on September 11, 2006, 10:26:18 PM
Quote from: "klaasend"
Quote from: "Hotshot"
Quote from: "klaasend"
Quote from: "Hotshot"
You guys have to see one of the newer movies the Deciples put out.  Sure people don't carry guns in aruba.  There are more here like, go to church and stuff that needs to be seen before they pull them.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4F5bihsB2ws&mode=related&search=

Why are you saying it's the DDD?

The original videos are there, or some of them, then it looks like friends of his had him upload more....I started here.
http://www.youtube.com/profile?user=dsp360420

Sorry Hotshot, I'm not following you.  The first link you posted doesn't have anything to do with the DDD as far as I can tell.  Yes, I see some of the originals are still there.  I don't see where more have been uploaded by him.


I know I'm old and out of it, but could you explain please what the heck the two of you are discussing? I'm really lost. :oops:  :oops:


Title: Thanks
Post by: IBE on September 11, 2006, 10:27:01 PM
Good Monkeys, keep up the good work. I am about 40 pages behind in reading but it is my birthday and has been a sad day since it is 9/11. Am trying to get rid of a headache. Almost 6.000 have died when you count those on 9/11 and in our military.

I always feel at home when I sign-in in here or lurk. This is like home. Thank you very much for all of you being here for Natalee, her family and friends and for Liberty and Justice.


Thanks and God Bless,  IBE..  PS..will add to the "what were you doing on 9/11 later"


Title: Lively Case Discussion #522 9/10 - 9/12/2006
Post by: San on September 11, 2006, 10:27:55 PM
Quote from: "BTgirl"
Quote from: "klaasend"
Quote from: "Hotshot"
Quote from: "klaasend"
Quote from: "Hotshot"
You guys have to see one of the newer movies the Deciples put out.  Sure people don't carry guns in aruba.  There are more here like, go to church and stuff that needs to be seen before they pull them.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4F5bihsB2ws&mode=related&search=

Why are you saying it's the DDD?

The original videos are there, or some of them, then it looks like friends of his had him upload more....I started here.
http://www.youtube.com/profile?user=dsp360420

Sorry Hotshot, I'm not following you.  The first link you posted doesn't have anything to do with the DDD as far as I can tell.  Yes, I see some of the originals are still there.  I don't see where more have been uploaded by him.


I know I'm old and out of it, but could you explain please what the heck the two of you are discussing? I'm really lost. :oops:  :oops:

Glad you asked because I was too embarrassed to ask :D


Title: Lively Case Discussion #522 9/10 - 9/12/2006
Post by: Hotshot on September 11, 2006, 10:28:20 PM
Quote from: "klaasend"
Quote from: "Hotshot"
Quote from: "klaasend"
Quote from: "Hotshot"
You guys have to see one of the newer movies the Deciples put out.  Sure people don't carry guns in aruba.  There are more here like, go to church and stuff that needs to be seen before they pull them.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4F5bihsB2ws&mode=related&search=

Why are you saying it's the DDD?

The original videos are there, or some of them, then it looks like friends of his had him upload more....I started here.
http://www.youtube.com/profile?user=dsp360420

Sorry Hotshot, I'm not following you.  The first link you posted doesn't have anything to do with the DDD as far as I can tell.  Yes, I see some of the originals are still there.  I don't see where more have been uploaded by him.


OK, there was one he did called "go to church" so I clicked on it, and then went to see all videos.  This one was there.  Weird, I can't find it again.  But I have it marked.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #522 9/10 - 9/12/2006
Post by: klaasend on September 11, 2006, 10:29:12 PM
DDD = Digital Dub Deciples = aru-bay videos


Title: Lively Case Discussion #522 9/10 - 9/12/2006
Post by: BTgirl on September 11, 2006, 10:30:18 PM
Happy Birthday IBE and great big smoochies to ya!!
(http://bestsmileys.com/birthday1/11.gif)


Title: Lively Case Discussion #522 9/10 - 9/12/2006
Post by: oldfart on September 11, 2006, 10:30:40 PM
BT & SAN   I know what came to my mind and can guess about a few of the MM (male Monekys) here when you mention Thriple D's  :shock:  :oops:  :oops:
But thats not it...  

Gangs of somesort  ( I think)??


Title: Lively Case Discussion #522 9/10 - 9/12/2006
Post by: BTgirl on September 11, 2006, 10:31:48 PM
Quote from: "oldfart"
BT & SAN   I know what came to my mind and can guess about a few of the MM (male Monekys) here when you mention Thriple D's  :shock:  :oops:  :oops:
But thats not it...  

Gangs of somesort  ( I think)??



 :lol:  :lol:  :lol:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #522 9/10 - 9/12/2006
Post by: oldfart on September 11, 2006, 10:32:08 PM
Quote from: "oldfart"
BT & SAN   I know what came to my mind and can guess about a few of the MM (male Monekys) here when you mention Thriple D's  :shock:  :oops:  :oops:
But thats not it...  

Gangs of somesort  ( I think)??


Well it looks like my 1st thought may have been closer :?


Title: Lively Case Discussion #522 9/10 - 9/12/2006
Post by: klaasend on September 11, 2006, 10:35:27 PM
Quote from: "BTgirl"
Happy Birthday IBE and great big smoochies to ya!!
(http://bestsmileys.com/birthday1/11.gif)


IBE - HAPPY BIRTHDAY!!


Title: Lively Case Discussion #522 9/10 - 9/12/2006
Post by: Jacqueline on September 11, 2006, 10:39:12 PM
http://www.jacquielawson.com/viewcard.asp?code=DC47215130


HAPPY BIRTHDAY IBE!!!!!!!!


Title: Re: Thanks
Post by: Kat_Gram on September 11, 2006, 10:40:50 PM
Quote from: "IBE"
Good Monkeys, keep up the good work. I am about 40 pages behind in reading but it is my birthday and has been a sad day since it is 9/11. Am trying to get rid of a headache. Almost 6.000 have died when you count those on 9/11 and in our military.

I always feel at home when I sign-in in here or lurk. This is like home. Thank you very much for all of you being here for Natalee, her family and friends and for Liberty and Justice.


Thanks and God Bless,  IBE..  PS..will add to the "what were you doing on 9/11 later"


HAPPY BIRTHDAY IBE.  I DON'T HAVE A CAKE, BUT I HAVE GOOD WISHES AND I AM SINGING  
Happy Happy Birthday to you, our IBE Monkey


Title: Lively Case Discussion #522 9/10 - 9/12/2006
Post by: San on September 11, 2006, 10:40:56 PM
IBE, I hope you enjoyed your day.

Some birthday wishes for you:

http://www.scaredmonkeys.net/viewtopic.php?t=335


Title: Lively Case Discussion #522 9/10 - 9/12/2006
Post by: Kat_Gram on September 11, 2006, 10:45:17 PM
Quote from: "robots"
or whatever her stupid name is  8)  :twisted:

Her stupid name is Dog of Aruba. Whew, when I read you post, I thought you ewe was calling me a sheep  ! !


Title: Lively Case Discussion #522 9/10 - 9/12/2006
Post by: BTgirl on September 11, 2006, 10:46:38 PM
Goodnight Monkeys.

Have a wonderful evening. :D


Title: Lively Case Discussion #522 9/10 - 9/12/2006
Post by: San on September 11, 2006, 10:47:24 PM
Quote from: "BTgirl"
Goodnight Monkeys.

Have a wonderful evening. :D

Nite BT.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #522 9/10 - 9/12/2006
Post by: klaasend on September 11, 2006, 10:47:24 PM
Quote from: "BTgirl"
Goodnight Monkeys.

Have a wonderful evening. :D

Nite BTgirl


Title: Lively Case Discussion #522 9/10 - 9/12/2006
Post by: Kat_Gram on September 11, 2006, 10:47:36 PM
What noise does a sheep make when it explodes ?

Siss Boom Baaaaaaaaaa !


Title: Lively Case Discussion #522 9/10 - 9/12/2006
Post by: oldfart on September 11, 2006, 10:51:50 PM
Quote from: "Kat_Gram"
What noise does a sheep make when it explodes ?

Siss Boom Baaaaaaaaaa !


Gee KAT
I would have thought it would have been
Baaaaaaa Boooom   sissssssssss :wink:

What you can learn here is better than school at times :shock:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #522 9/10 - 9/12/2006
Post by: Lala'sMom on September 11, 2006, 10:52:52 PM
San
Do you have a permit for that gun?  
And Old Fart, I am in charge of THE BOOK.   :roll:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #522 9/10 - 9/12/2006
Post by: San on September 11, 2006, 10:52:53 PM
GOODNIGHT EVERYONE


Title: Lively Case Discussion #522 9/10 - 9/12/2006
Post by: robots on September 11, 2006, 10:53:44 PM
Quote from: "Kat_Gram"
Quote from: "robots"
or whatever her stupid name is  8)  :twisted:

Her stupid name is Dog of Aruba. Whew, when I read you post, I thought you ewe was calling me a sheep  ! !


monkeys aint sheep  :wink:  8)


Title: Lively Case Discussion #522 9/10 - 9/12/2006
Post by: Lala'sMom on September 11, 2006, 10:53:58 PM
Night San...sweet dreams.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #522 9/10 - 9/12/2006
Post by: San on September 11, 2006, 10:54:07 PM
Quote from: "Lala'sMom"
San
Do you have a permit for that gun?  
And Old Fart, I am in charge of THE BOOK.   :roll:

What gun :shock:  :lol:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #522 9/10 - 9/12/2006
Post by: Lala'sMom on September 11, 2006, 10:54:53 PM
Night BT, sweet dreams.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #522 9/10 - 9/12/2006
Post by: Dana on September 11, 2006, 10:58:36 PM
Quote from: "Kat_Gram"
What noise does a sheep make when it explodes ?

Siss Boom Baaaaaaaaaa !


Classic Carnac from the late Johnny Carson.
Ed could not stop laughing when he did that one.
www.johnnycarson.com


Title: Lively Case Discussion #522 9/10 - 9/12/2006
Post by: Lala'sMom on September 11, 2006, 11:01:42 PM
Good Evening Dana, hope you are well.  What time zone are you in? Just curious.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #522 9/10 - 9/12/2006
Post by: klaasend on September 11, 2006, 11:03:24 PM
Quote from: "San"
GOODNIGHT EVERYONE

Nite San


Title: Lively Case Discussion #522 9/10 - 9/12/2006
Post by: Dana on September 11, 2006, 11:04:19 PM
Quote from: "Lala'sMom"
Good Evening Dana, hope you are well.  What time zone are you in? Just curious.


well sasktachewan canada (where i live) is one of the few places that never changes times zones so I get really confused when im asked that. i use et for my show to make it less confusing, I will say thought it would be 11:10pm et or 9:10pm my time when I write this. :-)


Title: Lively Case Discussion #522 9/10 - 9/12/2006
Post by: oldfart on September 11, 2006, 11:06:36 PM
Time to go Monkeys...

LaLa's
Gun permit?  For what Gun?  & I'm betting if there was one SAN would not "need any stinking" permit  :wink:

No biggie but I did start a new Topic
"Fisher Man's Hut? and the KALPOE'S statement of 5/31/005 "
http://www.scaredmonkeys.net/viewtopic.php?t=337

It appears (to Me) the current story was in the making on 5/31  and either Joran started it (do not know yet) or the police did :shock:

SeeeYaaaaaaByeeeeeeeee


Title: Lively Case Discussion #522 9/10 - 9/12/2006
Post by: oldfart on September 11, 2006, 11:10:51 PM
SAM

out the door   but more Rain headed your way

SYB


Title: Lively Case Discussion #522 9/10 - 9/12/2006
Post by: Kat_Gram on September 11, 2006, 11:11:50 PM
Quote from: "Dana"
Quote from: "Kat_Gram"
What noise does a sheep make when it explodes ?

Siss Boom Baaaaaaaaaa !


Classic Carnac from the late Johnny Carson.
Ed could not stop laughing when he did that one.
www.johnnycarson.com

You knew where I got it from  ! !
Holy Moley, can't fool those policemen  ! !


Title: Lively Case Discussion #522 9/10 - 9/12/2006
Post by: Dana on September 11, 2006, 11:15:01 PM
Quote from: "Kat_Gram"
Quote from: "Dana"
Quote from: "Kat_Gram"
What noise does a sheep make when it explodes ?

Siss Boom Baaaaaaaaaa !


Classic Carnac from the late Johnny Carson.
Ed could not stop laughing when he did that one.
www.johnnycarson.com

You knew where I got it from  ! !
Holy Moley, can't fool those policemen  ! !

Ok here's another one..
In my best Carson Voice and envelope up to my forehead.

"Dipidy Doo"

And You Say in your best Ed Mcmahon voice  "dipidy doo"

I open the envelope and say
"what forms on your dipidy first thing in the morning"

:-)

Love Carnac !


Title: Lively Case Discussion #522 9/10 - 9/12/2006
Post by: Anna on September 11, 2006, 11:18:24 PM
Quote from: "Hotshot"
[OK, there was one he did called "go to church" so I clicked on it, and then went to see all videos.  This one was there.  Weird, I can't find it again.  But I have it marked.


I believe Go to Church is posted by Calioc but it is not the DDD group.  Different group.  Very different sound.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #522 9/10 - 9/12/2006
Post by: Kat_Gram on September 11, 2006, 11:19:46 PM
I used to love Carson when he did Carnac  ! !


Title: Lively Case Discussion #522 9/10 - 9/12/2006
Post by: klaasend on September 11, 2006, 11:20:51 PM
Quote from: "Anna"
Quote from: "Hotshot"
[OK, there was one he did called "go to church" so I clicked on it, and then went to see all videos.  This one was there.  Weird, I can't find it again.  But I have it marked.


I believe Go to Church is posted by Calioc but it is not the DDD group.  Different group.  Very different sound.

Anna - you are correct.  Not the DDD.  I think Hotshot picked it up because it has a tag of Deciples but that doesn't mean anything.  Not the same guy.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #522 9/10 - 9/12/2006
Post by: Dana on September 11, 2006, 11:21:04 PM
Quote from: "Kat_Gram"
I used to love Carson when he did Carnac  ! !

Ditto, late night tv has not been the same since Johnny left it.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #522 9/10 - 9/12/2006
Post by: Kat_Gram on September 11, 2006, 11:22:19 PM
Well, thks for the jokes. Sometime a little laff is needed on such a somber day as today. Nite All you cheeky little monkeys ! !


Title: Lively Case Discussion #522 9/10 - 9/12/2006
Post by: 2NJSons_Mom on September 11, 2006, 11:26:29 PM
Quote from: "Dana"
Quote from: "Lala'sMom"
Good Evening Dana, hope you are well.  What time zone are you in? Just curious.


well sasktachewan canada (where i live) is one of the few places that never changes times zones so I get really confused when im asked that. i use et for my show to make it less confusing, I will say thought it would be 11:10pm et or 9:10pm my time when I write this. :-)


Lala's....good question....I found this...seems Dana's area is Central Zone, and does not observe Daylight Savings Time, with exceptions:

http://www.timetemperature.com/tzca/current_time_in_saskatchewan.shtml


Title: Lively Case Discussion #522 9/10 - 9/12/2006
Post by: Lala'sMom on September 11, 2006, 11:37:18 PM
Quote from: "2NJSons_Mom"
Quote from: "Dana"
Quote from: "Lala'sMom"
Good Evening Dana, hope you are well.  What time zone are you in? Just curious.


well sasktachewan canada (where i live) is one of the few places that never changes times zones so I get really confused when im asked that. i use et for my show to make it less confusing, I will say thought it would be 11:10pm et or 9:10pm my time when I write this. :-)


Lala's....good question....I found this...seems Dana's area is Central Zone, and does not observe Daylight Savings Time, with exceptions:

http://www.timetemperature.com/tzca/current_time_in_saskatchewan.shtml


I thought I always asked good questions.  :lol:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #522 9/10 - 9/12/2006
Post by: Anna on September 11, 2006, 11:41:43 PM
.
HAPPY BIRTHDAY TO MY IBE


(http://i15.photobucket.com/albums/a360/AnnaBlueSkies/2418c9z_th.gif)



~And many moooooreeeeee. . .. . ..

.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #522 9/10 - 9/12/2006
Post by: Lala'sMom on September 11, 2006, 11:42:26 PM
Hey, has anyone seen CP405 lately?  She hasn't told me she was leaving the country so I am looking for her.  :roll:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #522 9/10 - 9/12/2006
Post by: klaasend on September 11, 2006, 11:44:40 PM
Quote from: "Lala'sMom"
Hey, has anyone seen CP405 lately?  She hasn't told me she was leaving the country so I am looking for her.  :roll:

Last time she posted was Sept 6


Title: Lively Case Discussion #522 9/10 - 9/12/2006
Post by: Lala'sMom on September 11, 2006, 11:46:50 PM
Anna
I think that little pup in your sig line must be the absolute cutest thing I have ever seen.  She certainly has attitude!  I can't stop looking at her in that little red dress.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #522 9/10 - 9/12/2006
Post by: tcumom on September 11, 2006, 11:46:56 PM
And has Sleuth posted lately ~ I worry about the monks when they're MIA over a period of time  :(


Title: Lively Case Discussion #522 9/10 - 9/12/2006
Post by: klaasend on September 11, 2006, 11:48:43 PM
Sleuth hasn't posted since August 31, just after the hurricane.  She said something about having to go to work and hasn't been back since.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #522 9/10 - 9/12/2006
Post by: Lala'sMom on September 11, 2006, 11:57:17 PM
Okay, I just emailed CP405.  If she doesn't answer me soon, I have her phone number.  If you are out there CP let us know if everything is okay and how is my Nemo?


Title: Lively Case Discussion #522 9/10 - 9/12/2006
Post by: klaasend on September 11, 2006, 11:58:26 PM
Quote from: "Lala'sMom"
Okay, I just emailed CP405.  If she doesn't answer me soon, I have her phone number.  If you are out there CP let us know if everything is okay and how is my Nemo?

Let us know if you hear from her please, TIA


Title: Lively Case Discussion #522 9/10 - 9/12/2006
Post by: Lala'sMom on September 11, 2006, 11:58:50 PM
Quote from: "klaasend"
Sleuth hasn't posted since August 31, just after the hurricane.  She said something about having to go to work and hasn't been back since.


I don't have Sleuth's email or phone number, maybe another monkey does and would be kind enough to check on her for us. Who else are we missing lately?


Title: Lively Case Discussion #522 9/10 - 9/12/2006
Post by: Anna on September 11, 2006, 11:59:13 PM
.
Lala's I love that photo, too.  She is not one of mine but I run into lots of dogs with attitude lately.  They are especially bad just after being groomed I have found.  Think they are something special.


I can't wait for more statements to be released.  I remember at one time somebody said the dossier was 1200 pages.  Klaas will be bonkers by them, lol.  But I doubt most of that is statements and wonder what it might be.  Probably ALE stalking Natalee's family while they were in Aruba.

Going to swing by the Front Page on my way out to the Monkey Bunkey.

Have a good night, Monkeys.. . . . . .


Title: Lively Case Discussion #522 9/10 - 9/12/2006
Post by: Lala'sMom on September 12, 2006, 12:01:49 AM
Night Anna, sleep well.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #522 9/10 - 9/12/2006
Post by: Lala'sMom on September 12, 2006, 12:07:46 AM
Heading to bed myself.  Hope Nemo is okay...hugs to him. Night all.


Title: Thanks Anna
Post by: IBE on September 12, 2006, 12:28:41 AM
Thanks Anna for the Birthday wish! I has made 9/11 much. much happier this evening. We all have come a long way.

You and the other Good Monkeys keep up the Good Work!


Title: OPPs Spelling
Post by: IBE on September 12, 2006, 12:32:23 AM
opps the post should have said "It" not "I"


Title: Lively Case Discussion #522 9/10 - 9/12/2006
Post by: Peaches on September 12, 2006, 12:42:05 AM
Happy Birthday, IBE!  

Now that I'm caught up and have spent the afternoon snoozing, here I am.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #522 9/10 - 9/12/2006
Post by: memphis on September 12, 2006, 12:48:52 AM
Well, sorry guys. I was rudely interupted and had to leave my monkey post.  :lol:  Now everyone has gone to bed. So sad.

Happy Birthday yesterday, IBE!   :D


Title: Lively Case Discussion #522 9/10 - 9/12/2006
Post by: KatzHome on September 12, 2006, 01:00:57 AM
Happy Birthday, IBE!  And ~ hi everyone who is here!


Title: Lively Case Discussion #522 9/10 - 9/12/2006
Post by: Peaches on September 12, 2006, 01:22:45 AM
Looks like a small crowd tonite.  I have a date with the oral surgeon tomorrow about 11 to see what's going on with my left bottom wisdom tooth.  Should be no big deal.  Just another expensive nuisance even with dental insurance.....

I'll check in with y'all tomorrow afternoon.  

It's been such a sad day.  So many sad things going on in the world and people still have time to be petty and small about stupid things.  I don't get it.  We have so much to be thankful for in this country and in this life.

Never forget how important you are to me, each and everyone of you.  Never forget how important this Monkey family is to Natalee and her family.

Smoochies to all.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #522 9/10 - 9/12/2006
Post by: KatzHome on September 12, 2006, 01:43:12 AM
Good night, Peaches...  Wishing you the best with that wisdom tooth...


Title: Lively Case Discussion #522 9/10 - 9/12/2006
Post by: KatzHome on September 12, 2006, 01:45:01 AM
Quote from: "Peaches"
Good afternoon.  Getting ready to commute on home.  Lots of good thinking going on here.

Sad news over the weekend.  Christal, absolutely my hero, lost her battle with ependymoma (brain cancer) and made her way home to heaven yesterday morning.  I am beyond sad.

Her CD is almost ready to release.  What a treasure to be able to hear Christal singing along with many other artists.  

Thanks to a Scared Monkey, Christal has a candle page.  You can find it in the Lounge under Pray for Christal.  Thank you all.


I'm just reading back now, Peaches {{{hugs}}} I am so very sorry for your loss.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #522 9/10 - 9/12/2006
Post by: KatzHome on September 12, 2006, 01:53:52 AM
Quote from: "Shizaru"
Added to timeline from Bubali statments:


Sunday

Deepak observes that Natalee dances beautifully and does not appear unsteady on her feet when she steps off the stage, altho he initially tells polis he could tell she was drunk from how she was dancing and that she swayed on her feet when she walked. She walks up to Joran and Deepak hears her say "Hi, how's it going? Why didn't you dance with me?" Deepak hears Joran laugh hard but can't hear his answer, Natalee again asks him to dance and Joran declines.  Deepak then sees Natalee walk over to some of her friends, three girls and two boys. Deepak speaks to a friend for 5-10 minutes, then can't find Satish and Joran so he goes outside to wait in the car (D 5/31, 6/9, 6/11)

Natalee tells Deepak that he has beautiful car and she wants to drive around. (D 5/31, 6/9)

Natalee calls a boy's name, which Deepak can't remember  (D 5/31)  

Tuesday

3:30 pm: Deepak gives his witness statement at Bubali station, in which he describes the trip to the lighthouse, and the fictional HI dropoff with the security guard. Polis ask Deepak if Joran and Natalee had gotten out of the car and walked by the sea at the Fisherman's Huts, and he says no.

7:20 pm: Satish gives his witness statement at Bubali station, in which he describes the trip to the lighthouse, and the fictional HI dropoff with the security guard. Satish claims that while in the car he saw Joran both kissing and fingering Natalee, altho his 6/11 statement only mentions kissing.  In this statement, Satish seems to contradict Joran and Deepak on several points regarding the events at CnCs: He says that Joran danced with Natalee, and that he then left Joran and Deepak and walked around inside CnCs,  and he implies that the four of them walked out of CnCs together. Polis ask Satish if Joran and Natalee had gotten out of the car and walked by the sea at the Fisherman's Huts, and he says no.

June 11: Deepak and Satish give statements in which they admit having lied about leaving Natalee at the HI, and say that Joran and Natalee got out at the beach near the Marriott.  Deepak says he thinks that Joran raped Natalee, but did not murder her. Satish's description of events at CnCs is now consistent with that of Joran and Deepak.

http://blogsfornatalee.com/forums/index.php?topic=4590.msg146617#msg146617


Thanks to Paulus' coaching, I'll bet...  And the beginning makes me think for certain that Joran slipped something into that drink of 151 that he bought her...


Title: Lively Case Discussion #522 9/10 - 9/12/2006
Post by: KatzHome on September 12, 2006, 01:55:36 AM
Quote from: "Spock"
Janssen can not only charge and prosecute Deepak and Satish for giving false statements as a witness in a murder investigation, there is a greater charge to be filed and prosecuted:

Conspiracy to Obstruct a Murder Investigation

The two did not act individually to implicate the security guards, they worked up the story together to have the SGs arrested. Remember what Micky John said he heard Deepak say while they both were in custody:

"He (Deepak) said a story being made up about dropping the girl of at a Holiday Inn, was all something being made up. He, and the Dutch guy, and the Dutch guy's father, they sit and made up the story".


Interesting point there, Spock.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #522 9/10 - 9/12/2006
Post by: KatzHome on September 12, 2006, 01:58:36 AM
Quote from: "the big hammer"
deepak 6/11: The "truth" OR another cover story?

NM writes: "...Check this out dk spills the HI is a lie and the pow-wow around the pool to Mikey sometime June9-10. when jurin finds out he panics and confesses to everything during the late hrs of June 10, the confession is reported then retracted in the press from June 10 11PM-June 11 1AM, then dk give the fish.hut story June11..."


On 6/11, all of them are telling the beach drop off story.  Has everybody been brought back to the reservation OR is this a "Mexican" standoff?

Could be a little of both.

1.  Through false witness statement and perjury charges, k2 are in trouble based on their witness statements.  
2.  The false witness statements implicates k2 directly, maing them much more suspicious than jvds.
3.  jvds has not provided a "witness statement" and k2 lawyer says she has been told (by prosecution?) that jvds statement is not "relevant" and presumably not provided...
4.  See how guilty k2 looks at this stage?

But on 6/10 jvds confesses, and retracts, and on 6/11 everyone is saying the fisherman's huts and beach drop off story.

Maybe deepak said: "You are try to frame me, and I'm going to spill it all" panicking jvds, until Paulus came in as "cat wrangler" and got everyone back in the cage.  

And there it sits: a failed frame up of k2, but k2 w/ criminal behavior on record (perjury, obstruction, contempt, conspiracy) and knowledge of what happened (polis car tape) can put jvds on trial for murder.  

So no prosecution of k2. And no accurate "witness" statement (from k2) to nail the sloots.


And when is Holland going to begin working on this???


Title: Lively Case Discussion #522 9/10 - 9/12/2006
Post by: KatzHome on September 12, 2006, 02:00:40 AM
Quote from: "Buckeye"
Talking of conspiracy and premeditation...

In Deepak's 6/29 statement he talks of making up things in the email to John Croes that Sunday night/Monday morning...because he thought they would check his computer.  If he only thought Joran was left on the beach..why would he think there would be an investigation?? Deepak knew something very bad happened that night..they were in cover up mode immediately.

You are telling me that John Charles CROES has stated that I wrote while I was chatting with him that I had written that the girl had put her hands in/down my pants, I can say the following. I did this to frustrate/mess up the investigation. I wanted to direct the focus of the police on myself and Joran because we were afraid that Satish would get the details wrong with regard to the "Holiday Inn" story. I was almost certain that our telephone conversations were being taped and I was certain that my computer was being monitored too. [/b]


Excellent point, Buckeye!


Title: Lively Case Discussion #522 9/10 - 9/12/2006
Post by: KatzHome on September 12, 2006, 02:04:52 AM
Quote from: "SunFreak2"
Quote from: "KatzHome"


I remembered your friend, SunFreak, and the cousin she lost 5 years ago on this day...  and remembered all who gave their lives...


Thanks for your prayers.  He was MY cousin, lost in the line of duty.  :(


{{{hugs}}}  Sunfreak...  I'm sorry ~ your cousin...  your friend's irthday, then ~ or did I read that all wrong the other day?

It just really struck me that someone else posting here not only lost their cousin too ~ but that it was also someone's birthday...  Just like my Aunt Marie and Ronald...  At least she was up from Florida visiting him ~ and he woke her up to kiss her good-bye that morning before he left for work...


Title: Lively Case Discussion #522 9/10 - 9/12/2006
Post by: KatzHome on September 12, 2006, 02:10:32 AM
Quote from: "Lala'sMom"
Quote from: "Buckeye"
Quote from: "igsigs"
Quote from: "Buckeye"

Maybe it was Guido and he talked to Arlene and Arlene called the top notch lawyer and Guido took a trip to Holland.  The timing is curious...

Curiosity abounds on 6/10. I see the possibility that Joran implicated someone in his "confession" that either personally, or through connections was not deemed investigatable.


Bingo


That would be our infamous Lorenzo.  It was stated he was questioned but nothing else was ever mentioned.  He simply disappeared from the radar screen as quickly as he appeared. Also remember Shango said "he couldn't be touched".

Evening Monkeys, hope everyone is well.


I can tango with that one, Lalas...  I don't know who Beth's investigators are leaning towards ~ I wish I did...  but my gut says Lorenzo...

I don't think he can be touched... Maybe Shango was dead-on in that one...  maybe all the Shango posts are...  if we only understood what they really mean...


Title: Lively Case Discussion #522 9/10 - 9/12/2006
Post by: KatzHome on September 12, 2006, 02:12:41 AM
Quote from: "memphis"
Quote from: "Lala'sMom"
Memphis
Who do you think this mystery witness/suspect could be?


I think I'm with Klaasend on Lorenzo, and maybe Guido.

Have you been reading some of the theories since last night?


I'm sorry that I don't know ~ where is Klaas on Lorenzo?


Title: Lively Case Discussion #522 9/10 - 9/12/2006
Post by: KatzHome on September 12, 2006, 02:15:10 AM
Quote from: "memphis"
Ya know, I try to think it's the simple scenario of date rape gone bad. I really do, but then, I just can't get my mind around how everything could be so blantantly covered up just for one Dutch kid. Aruba has done some fantastic and unbelievable things to make this whole thing disappear. I just don't understand how there could not be one honest cop to step forward. Everyone is silenced. Everyone is terribly afraid. WHY? Why are that so afraid if it is just one (or three) kid(s) who are responsible.


That's what makes me think they are covering for the drug dealer, Lorenzo...  that he was the one who helped them dispose of Natalee's body...  I don't know ~ I may be way off base with that thought, though...


Title: Re: Thanks
Post by: KatzHome on September 12, 2006, 02:18:20 AM
Quote from: "IBE"
Good Monkeys, keep up the good work. I am about 40 pages behind in reading but it is my birthday and has been a sad day since it is 9/11. Am trying to get rid of a headache. Almost 6.000 have died when you count those on 9/11 and in our military.

I always feel at home when I sign-in in here or lurk. This is like home. Thank you very much for all of you being here for Natalee, her family and friends and for Liberty and Justice.


Thanks and God Bless,  IBE..  PS..will add to the "what were you doing on 9/11 later"


I hope your headache is gone by now, IBE ~ and again, belated Happy Birthday...


Title: Lively Case Discussion #522 9/10 - 9/12/2006
Post by: Spock on September 12, 2006, 02:44:15 AM
Consider these two statements and then tell me what you think happened:

From Deepak's Statement:

"To your question as to where Steve was to have been able to see to see all of this, I can state the following. I didn't ask him where he was in order to have seen all of this. He also told me that he had not been into work that day. He instead had been at "Carlos & Charlies" and because of that he was in two minds about going to the police because he feared loosing his job."

From Joran's Statement:


On my question to Joran whether he can tell me what happened after the girl had fallen asleep on the beach near Fisherman's Hut, he answered:

"I called DEEPAK and he came with two dogs. I think he raped the girl and did something to her.”

To my question where the girl was buried then, he answered:
“I think that it was buried then next to the wall of the Fisherman's Hut, for the rest I would not know either.”

During the conversation Joran showed differing emotions. Sometimes he cried, sometimes he was direct in his answers.

IMO, Joran left Natalee on the Beach, was given a ride home by one of the Kalpoes who returned with two dogs one of which could have been Croes. Think about it: it does explain alot. I also have a good idea who the second dog could have been.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #522 9/10 - 9/12/2006
Post by: Spock on September 12, 2006, 02:50:00 AM
Quote from: "Spock"
Consider these two statements and then tell me what you think happened:

From Deepak's Statement:

"To your question as to where Steve was to have been able to see to see all of this, I can state the following. I didn't ask him where he was in order to have seen all of this. He also told me that he had not been into work that day. He instead had been at "Carlos & Charlies" and because of that he was in two minds about going to the police because he feared loosing his job."

From Joran's Statement:


On my question to Joran whether he can tell me what happened after the girl had fallen asleep on the beach near Fisherman's Hut, he answered:

"I called DEEPAK and he came with two dogs. I think he raped the girl and did something to her.”

To my question where the girl was buried then, he answered:
“I think that it was buried then next to the wall of the Fisherman's Hut, for the rest I would not know either.”

During the conversation Joran showed differing emotions. Sometimes he cried, sometimes he was direct in his answers.

IMO, Joran left Natalee on the Beach, was given a ride home by one of the Kalpoes who returned with two dogs one of which could have been Croes. Think about it: it does explain alot. I also have a good idea who the second dog could have been.


Title: The Card
Post by: IBE on September 12, 2006, 03:22:25 AM
What a great card! Thank you! When I had a home I used to play that song to do the housework; close all the blinds, "get cool" and dance while dusting.

My favorite song. Thanks. Great art work!


Title: Help Klaas
Post by: IBE on September 12, 2006, 03:30:49 AM
Help!! Klaas,

Are you still up? This post, about the card, was supposed to go under the IBE Birthday thread... can you move it for me???

On this thread, the whole world will know how I used to clean house!

Thanks  

IBE


Title: It's OK
Post by: IBE on September 12, 2006, 03:44:46 AM
Am caught up in my reading of the thread and all are in bed!

Thank you all for the birthday wishes for 9/11 They made my day!

Klaas might as well keep the comments in that I just made before... for everyone would know it from the birthday thread anyway.

Tomorrow (actually today now) I will turn on some music like I used to and start to unclutter the clutter.

Thanks EVERYONE

Love,

"IBE"


Title: Lively Case Discussion #522 9/10 - 9/12/2006
Post by: igsigs on September 12, 2006, 04:09:18 AM
What was going down on 5/31?  Statements taken that day and subsequent statements clearly indicate knowledge of Fishermans Huts story...on 5/31.

12:30pm - Joran witness statement taken by Jacobs/Kelly. Content unknown.

4:30pm - Deepak witness statement taken by Jacobs/Kelly. On your question if Joran and the girl had stepped from my car at the Fisherman's Huts and walked by the sea; I will answer you no.

7:20pm - Satish witness statement taken by Jacobs. On your question if Joran and the girl had gotten out of the car at the Fisherman's Huts and walked by the sea; I will answer you no. Joran and the girl never got out of Deepak's car.

6/9 Joran Statement. You are informing me that when i was first interviewed as a witness that i told the Detective that Natalee and me got out of the car close to/near the Fisherman's Huts and walked in the sea. To your question as to what i can state about that, i answer you that i did not say that. It also is not in my witness statement.

6/14 Joran Statement.(referencing 5/31 statement) I cannot remember that in my statement i had said that i had been at the Fisherman's Huts with Natalee. It might be possible i said this.

 :arrow: Joran goes from clearly knowing that he did not mention the FHs on 6/9 to saying it is possible on 6/14. It could be that the statements were changed to favor Joran but more likely he was just lying on 6/9.

 :arrow: ALE is not off the hook in either case. The FH story was presented in some credible fashion on 5/31 and thus J2K's alibi was blown, or leaking heavily. Failure to arrest and interrogate J2K further at this point is without explanation. Arresting the SGs based on these statements was criminal.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #522 9/10 - 9/12/2006
Post by: igsigs on September 12, 2006, 04:36:42 AM
Assuming that Joran did mention the FH story on 5/31...

If you are Deepak and Satish what the heck are you thinking when ALE asks you if Joran and Natalee were at the FHs? You would think the HI cover story was blown. But they stick with it, both of them. Why?

Because the FH story is a total fabrication, and reacted to as an ALE fishing expedition by K2?

How important were those phone calls made by Joran to Deepak immediately PRIOR to and DURING the making of his statement on 5/31?


Title: Lively Case Discussion #522 9/10 - 9/12/2006
Post by: spooky112483 on September 12, 2006, 04:49:20 AM
Brian Clark civilian rescuer on 9/11 said "your friends are people you have experiances with" so true. that is why we are all friends here. we have been through this experiance concerning Natalee. we have all been here for Natalee and we will continue to be here for Natalee until there is justice for Natalee. But we have all become friends too in this experiance. Natalee's legacy lives on in each and every one of us that keeps speaking her name. You all are so beautiful for keeping Natalee's name alive and the case going. We will get justice for Natalee. I believe it deep inside me.
My love to all of you.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #522 9/10 - 9/12/2006
Post by: igsigs on September 12, 2006, 04:56:06 AM
And Joran's reason for calling Deepak DURING the making of his 5/31 statement? He says to ask what Natalee was wearing.

Setting aside the question of why Deepak would know more about Natalee's attire than Joran...this is Joran's statement and should not include Deepak's recollections.

Deepak was scheduled to be interviewed later anyway, get his input then.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #522 9/10 - 9/12/2006
Post by: igsigs on September 12, 2006, 04:59:56 AM
Quote from: "spooky112483"
We will get justice for Natalee.

You got that right.

Well said, Spooky.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #522 9/10 - 9/12/2006
Post by: Buckeye on September 12, 2006, 06:22:00 AM
Quote from: "igsigs"
What was going down on 5/31?  Statements taken that day and subsequent statements clearly indicate knowledge of Fishermans Huts story...on 5/31.

12:30pm - Joran witness statement taken by Jacobs/Kelly. Content unknown.

4:30pm - Deepak witness statement taken by Jacobs/Kelly. On your question if Joran and the girl had stepped from my car at the Fisherman's Huts and walked by the sea; I will answer you no.

7:20pm - Satish witness statement taken by Jacobs. On your question if Joran and the girl had gotten out of the car at the Fisherman's Huts and walked by the sea; I will answer you no. Joran and the girl never got out of Deepak's car.

6/9 Joran Statement. You are informing me that when i was first interviewed as a witness that i told the Detective that Natalee and me got out of the car close to/near the Fisherman's Huts and walked in the sea. To your question as to what i can state about that, i answer you that i did not say that. It also is not in my witness statement.

6/14 Joran Statement.(referencing 5/31 statement) I cannot remember that in my statement i had said that i had been at the Fisherman's Huts with Natalee. It might be possible i said this.

 :arrow: Joran goes from clearly knowing that he did not mention the FHs on 6/9 to saying it is possible on 6/14. It could be that the statements were changed to favor Joran but more likely he was just lying on 6/9.

 :arrow: ALE is not off the hook in either case. The FH story was presented in some credible fashion on 5/31 and thus J2K's alibi was blown, or leaking heavily. Failure to arrest and interrogate J2K further at this point is without explanation. Arresting the SGs based on these statements was criminal.


Now you have me thinking.  Anita tells them to stay away from the Marriot.  Maybe there was a party at the Marriot (or Holiday Inn like Tyler used to think) and they actually went there.  Maybe the ALE suggested Fisherman Huts to remove crime scene from tourist hotel area. ALE tweaked Joran's first statement??


Title: Lively Case Discussion #522 9/10 - 9/12/2006
Post by: Buckeye on September 12, 2006, 06:31:29 AM
from Deepak June 29th

On your question what Joran's mom meant by telling us that we should stay away from the "Marriot Hotel", I can say the following. With this she meant that the police was monitoring that area and that we were already in trouble. So avoid the area and that it was best to head home.

Why this warning from Anita?? They were ok going into other casinos and gambling...why stay away from the Marriot?? What happened there??


Title: Good Morning, Good Morning
Post by: Leslie on September 12, 2006, 06:40:05 AM
Diario
http://www.diarioaruba.com/
Amigoe
http://www.amigoe.com/english/
BonDia
http://www.cspnv.com/
Solo di Pueblo
http://www.solodipueblo.com/
Translator:
http://papiamentu.donamaro.nl

GMA message board.
http://forums.go.com/abcnews/GMA/forum?start=0&forumID=7


Title: Lively Case Discussion #522 9/10 - 9/12/2006
Post by: blah on September 12, 2006, 07:23:02 AM
Quote from: "KatzHome"
Quote from: "the big hammer"
deepak 6/11: The "truth" OR another cover story?

NM writes: "...Check this out dk spills the HI is a lie and the pow-wow around the pool to Mikey sometime June9-10. when jurin finds out he panics and confesses to everything during the late hrs of June 10, the confession is reported then retracted in the press from June 10 11PM-June 11 1AM, then dk give the fish.hut story June11..."


On 6/11, all of them are telling the beach drop off story.  Has everybody been brought back to the reservation OR is this a "Mexican" standoff?

Could be a little of both.

1.  Through false witness statement and perjury charges, k2 are in trouble based on their witness statements.  
2.  The false witness statements implicates k2 directly, maing them much more suspicious than jvds.
3.  jvds has not provided a "witness statement" and k2 lawyer says she has been told (by prosecution?) that jvds statement is not "relevant" and presumably not provided...
4.  See how guilty k2 looks at this stage?

But on 6/10 jvds confesses, and retracts, and on 6/11 everyone is saying the fisherman's huts and beach drop off story.

Maybe deepak said: "You are try to frame me, and I'm going to spill it all" panicking jvds, until Paulus came in as "cat wrangler" and got everyone back in the cage.  

And there it sits: a failed frame up of k2, but k2 w/ criminal behavior on record (perjury, obstruction, contempt, conspiracy) and knowledge of what happened (polis car tape) can put jvds on trial for murder.  

So no prosecution of k2. And no accurate "witness" statement (from k2) to nail the sloots.


And when is Holland going to begin working on this???


I dont think that retracted confession came from joran, deepak, or satish.  I think as part of the frame-job on the 2 security guards, the ALE  was going to say that one or both of the security guards confessed.  When the H/T's proved the guards innocent, the cover-up artists did not get the word out fast enough that the frame job was off. Thus the announcement that someone has confessed and the suspect is leading us to the body (and the later retraction)  After the police figured out they couldnt frame the 2 security guards, they knew they had to get rid of Natalee's body PERMANENTLY.  This scenario works with the timeline of arrest and release of the security guards and the jvds/k2's.  It also works with the K2/jvds being called witnesses at that time and the security guards being called suspects at that time.

Just something to think about.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #522 9/10 - 9/12/2006
Post by: Anna on September 12, 2006, 07:45:58 AM
.
I wonder what this says.  Something about Beth and tourism and a crisis.  From today's Diario:


Mike de Meza, Parlamentario AVP Turismo di Aruba den un crisis total y gobierno di Aruba ta bira cara otro banda



Siman pasa durante tratamento di e presupuesto di turismo di minister Briesen, nos a bin haya confirmacion cu enberdad turismo di Aruba a keda bay atras door di falta di un maneho efectivo y realistico.

Asina nos por a mira cu no tin un maneho cu ta asegura un crecemento real a base di un plan di mercadeo integral y agresivo y tambe un maneho cu ta “focus” riba un crecemento den turista cu un mihor entrada a base di un maneho integral y agresivo. Nos di fraccion di AVP a trece pa dilanti e varios “short comings”/ limitacionnan cu tin den e maneho y/o ehecucion di e maneho di turismo”, parlamentario di fraccion di AVP, Mike de Meza a expresa.

Igualmente el a bisa cu fraccion di AVP a trece dilanti cu net na e momento aki Aruba tin cu promove mas intensivo y efectivo, pero cu por a tuma nota cu minister Briesen ta corta den e prosupuesto di turismo. E minister a corta especialmente den e parti di promocion.

A sali na cla for di un raport di Centrale Accountant Dienst CAD cu ora a repasa p.e. den e raportahe financiero anual di 2003 a yega na e conlusion cu e administracion na ATA ta masha deficiente.

No tin un bon maneho riba e oficinanan internacional di ATA. Specificamente riba tereno di personal ta laga hopi di desea. Tin hende crucial a bay cu pension y a dura casi 2 aña pa remplasanan, tin trahadornan cu ta cu AO casi of mas cu un aña caba, tin mas ehecutivonan cu ta bay e aña aki.

Pero no tin un plan con ta sigui caminda esaki lo afecta e trabaonan. A sera oficina den cierto pais pasobra tabatin malversacion di placa y awor no tin ni representacion mas den tal pais!

“Imaginabo cu hasta nos por conclui cu nos PR (Public Relation) ta un “open book” pa esnan cu a declara publicamente cu lo haci todo por todo pa causa Aruba daño.

Por ehempel nos di AVP a prunta minister Briesen si ta berdad cu cuña (casa di e ruman homber) di Beth Twitty (mama di Nathalee Holloway) ta un partner di e compania cu ta encarga cu e PR pa ATA (lesa : Aruba su turismo)?
Nos tambe a puntra minister Briesen si e persona aki ainda ta encarga cu e PR pa Aruba su turismo, paso informacion disponibel ta bisa cu e persona aki tabata den hasta e ultimo reunion strategico pa Aruba su maneho riba turismo y con pa contraresta e problema cu e caso di Natalee Holloway a causa nos turismo”, de Meza a duna di conoce.
El a agrega cu contesta di minister Briesen tabata cu 1. minister no tin informacion “personal” di e señora aki y 2. cu e señora aki segun e ta kere no ta traha mas cu Aruba.

“Wel, pueblo tur dos contesta ta bisa nos cuant’or tin den maneho di turismo bao di minister Briesen. Pueblo mes huzga con nos turismo, pilar number 1 di nos economia, ta worde maneha”, segun Mike de Meza.

Por ultimo Mike de Meza a bisa cu a bin ta tuma nota cu tur e raportnan cu ta worde traha pa e e industria di turismo di Aruba, local of internacional, ta trece e preocupacion mas grandi dilanti: criminalidad ta aumentando y no tin un maneho corecto pa cu husticia en general!! Pa cuanto tempo mas e mal maneho aki mester continua. Dios bendiciona nos dushi pais Aruba.

http://www.diario-aruba.com/2006/9/12/


Title: Lively Case Discussion #522 9/10 - 9/12/2006
Post by: yapperz1 on September 12, 2006, 07:46:13 AM
Morning Monkeys
Found this interesting...tourism isn't down in Aruba huh????

http://www.amigoe.com/english/
<snip>
During the handling of the 2006 Tourism-budget, Lampe thought it remarkable that minister Edison Briesen (MEP) of Tourism and Transport doesn’t want to face the reality of the decreasing tourism figures.  Lampe also criticized the MEP that during the debate had mentioned that the decline was little.  “According to the Central Bank, the tourism in Aruba has not been so bad since 1986.  Anybody that denies that doesn’t want to face the facts.   I conclude that all of the MEP suffers from the collective denial syndrome”, said Lampe


Title: Lively Case Discussion #522 9/10 - 9/12/2006
Post by: Anna on September 12, 2006, 07:50:13 AM
Yapperz,

I also found this in the Dutch version with the number of 100,000.  I think that may be the number of tourists down so far or from a year ago.  To get the rest of the article, it wanted me to register so I just got the opening part:

Aruba
AVP wil meer investeringen in toerisme
Abonnee Artikel
ORANJESTAD — “We zijn zeer teleurgesteld over de manier waarop kabinet Oduber de crisissituatie in het toerisme bagatelliseert. Het toerisme uit de Verenigde Staten is afgenomen en in het afgelopen jaar kwamen er circa 100.000 toeristen minder. Zorgwekkend is dat studies van Aruba Tourism Authority (ATA) laten zien dat het imago van Aruba in het buitenland behoorlijk aangetast is.” Dat is de mening van Mike Eman, fractieleider van AVP, na het drie dagen durende debat in de Staten over de begroting van het ministerie van Toerisme en Transport.
11 Sep, 2006, 17:22 (GMT -04:00)
http://www.amigoe.com/artman/publish/cat_index_3.php


.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #522 9/10 - 9/12/2006
Post by: yapperz1 on September 12, 2006, 07:57:08 AM
Anna, PearlinUSA posted this at BFN yesterday. Think it may be a translation of that part of the article:

www.amigoe.com dutch version ..  Abonnee Artikel today

Subscriber Article ORANJESTAD -

 we have been very disappointed concerning the way cabinet Oduber minimises the crisis situation in tourism. Tourism from the United States has decreased and in last year tourists there approximately 100,000 less came.

 Worrisom is that studies of Aruba Tourism show Authority (ATA) that the image of Aruba is considerably damaged abroad. That is the opinion of Mike Eman, fractieleider of AVP, after three days debate lasting in the states concerning the budget of the ministry of tourism and transport.

11 Sep, 2006, 17.22 (GMT -04:00)


Title: Lively Case Discussion #522 9/10 - 9/12/2006
Post by: Anna on September 12, 2006, 08:02:33 AM
.
Thanks, Yapperz.  Yes, that looks right.  

Also at BFN is a statement by Satish that I think is new.  Believe it is June 11.  I wonder if Klaas is working on that one now.  It is long and I don't want to take away from her work if she is by bringing it here.

These statements are all beginning to run together in my mind.

Need more coffee. . . . . .


Title: Lively Case Discussion #522 9/10 - 9/12/2006
Post by: Anna on September 12, 2006, 08:06:14 AM
I wish Klaas were here.  Guess it is only 5 a.m. in California.  She is so much better at photos than I am but I could swear I see Steve Croes second from the right in this one.

What's wrong with his eyes??   :shock: If it is him, he looks dreadful.

http://tinyurl.com/m9nhx


Title: Lively Case Discussion #522 9/10 - 9/12/2006
Post by: Spock on September 12, 2006, 08:09:46 AM
Has everyone else noticed that Deepak declared that Steve Croes was at C&C the same time Joran, Satish, Deepak and Natalee were? Doesn't it make more sense now that Steve acted as a witness to the security guard drop-off lie.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #522 9/10 - 9/12/2006
Post by: klaasend on September 12, 2006, 08:13:26 AM
Quote from: "Anna"
I wish Klaas were here.  Guess it is only 5 a.m. in California.  She is so much better at photos than I am but I could swear I see Steve Croes second from the right in this one.

What's wrong with his eyes??   :shock: If it is him, he looks dreadful.

http://tinyurl.com/m9nhx

Hi Anna - I am here for a little while then I'm leaving for my teaching for for a few hours.  Your link above didn't work.  Why don't you post the long url and I'll take a look.  FYI, Steve C does look terrible these days.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #522 9/10 - 9/12/2006
Post by: yapperz1 on September 12, 2006, 08:14:20 AM
That pic is definitely Steve Croes. Man does he looked fried!!!


Title: Lively Case Discussion #522 9/10 - 9/12/2006
Post by: Anna on September 12, 2006, 08:14:30 AM
.
Spock,
I read it but it did not connect.   :shock: So Steve would know exactly who "the girl" would be most likely.  Very odd behavior on his part.

Do you think that is him in the photo I just posted the link for above?  I do but will defer to Klaas' better eye in that regard.

.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #522 9/10 - 9/12/2006
Post by: Anna on September 12, 2006, 08:15:49 AM
.
http://www.diario-aruba.com/gallery/displayimage.php?album=16&pos=8

.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #522 9/10 - 9/12/2006
Post by: Spock on September 12, 2006, 08:17:19 AM
Anna, I can't get that link to work for me.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #522 9/10 - 9/12/2006
Post by: Anna on September 12, 2006, 08:17:38 AM
.
If you make the photo large, it appears one eye is totally swollen and there might be something red on his nose like a cut or scratch and also some red around his mouth.

I think he has been in a car wreck or a fight or something.   :shock: He couldn't look THAT bad normally could he?

.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #522 9/10 - 9/12/2006
Post by: yapperz1 on September 12, 2006, 08:17:56 AM
Klaas when you get back from "class" will you post the map of the driving routes again?
Have to run out to do chores   :roll:  but will be back later
Have a good day everyone!!!

Spock you are right about Croes


Title: Lively Case Discussion #522 9/10 - 9/12/2006
Post by: Leslie on September 12, 2006, 08:18:32 AM
Anna:  Steve looks stoned to me.  You mentioned the Satish Suspect statement from June 11th so I re-read it and saw something I had missed before - the topic of conversation in the car enroute to C&C's.
According to Satish:
"On the way to Carlos and Charlies Joran told us that during that day in the afternoon hours he had met a few girls in the casino. Joran told us that he had helped a girl win back some of her father's money that she had lost. Joran had told us that she had lost three hundred something dollars of her father's money in the casino and that he had helped the girl win back a little over 100 dollars. Joran said that after the girl had won more than 100 dollars, he had told her that she should stop gambling. Joran said the girl had invited him to come to Carlos & Charlies. Joran did not mention the name of the girl. "

Does anyone think that Joram might have felt that this "girl" OWED him something and he was going to collect?


Title: Lively Case Discussion #522 9/10 - 9/12/2006
Post by: Spock on September 12, 2006, 08:18:59 AM
Quote from: "Spock"
Anna, I can't get that link to work for me.


Ok, I got it to work. Second from the right looks like Croes to me.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #522 9/10 - 9/12/2006
Post by: Anna on September 12, 2006, 08:23:47 AM
.
Leslie,
I thought the MB girls said that never happened about Joran winning any money back for anybody.   :roll: I think he is such a sociopath that he took this opportunity to attempt to enhance his reputation as a card player knowing Natalee was not going to be around to dispute his story.

Natalee wasn't even playing cards.  I believe Ruth was but unless I am mistaken, nothing like that happened.  I don't see them communicating in the video but if he won anything for anybody, it would have been Ruth, right?

With his mentality, I can see his trying to collect from Natalee, however.  I really don't put anything above these boys.  Not anything.

.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #522 9/10 - 9/12/2006
Post by: Anna on September 12, 2006, 08:26:54 AM
.
I don't even remember reading that Satish statement.  :?  Need to print them all out and put in order in a ring binder or something.   :(

.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #522 9/10 - 9/12/2006
Post by: klaasend on September 12, 2006, 08:31:33 AM
Yes, this is Steve.  Too bad the watermark is right in front of his face.  His eyes are looking real puffy lately, he looks terrible.  Has for the last few weeks:

(http://i14.photobucket.com/albums/a306/klaasend/SteveC.jpg)


Title: Lively Case Discussion #522 9/10 - 9/12/2006
Post by: Anna on September 12, 2006, 08:36:01 AM
.  Thanks, Klaas!

You have to go to work today, don't you?  We will be fine.   :D

.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #522 9/10 - 9/12/2006
Post by: Leslie on September 12, 2006, 08:38:07 AM
I thought Ruth was the "lucky charm" girl.   I wish the statements were in chronological order also.  On second thought - Steve Croes looks like a bloated drunkard.  I wish we had the ability to edit.  
Before going to C&C's, Ruth was the lucky charm girl but afterward Joran said that Natalee was.  Why?  Did he think that would explain how they  met without him looking like the aggressor and also show what a generous guy he was?  
Who was he thinking/talking about in the car on the way to C&C's - Ruth or Natalee?


Title: Lively Case Discussion #522 9/10 - 9/12/2006
Post by: San on September 12, 2006, 08:39:58 AM
Quote from: "Anna"
.
http://www.diario-aruba.com/gallery/displayimage.php?album=16&pos=8

.

OMG he looks disgusting.

Does anyone think if they ever found this guy dead that they would pin the whole thing on him.  I also feel the same way for the Kalpoe brothers.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #522 9/10 - 9/12/2006
Post by: San on September 12, 2006, 08:41:18 AM
Klaas you are up really early in the morning.

Enjoy your day teaching.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #522 9/10 - 9/12/2006
Post by: Anna on September 12, 2006, 08:43:43 AM
.
Leslie,
Well, I don't know but doubt he won any money for either of them but if he did, it would have been Ruth, right?  Natalee wasn't even really playing cards, just watching.  Jug said specifically Natalee did not know how to play ANY card games at all.  

I'm not sure which one he is talking about.  Maybe Spock knows as he has read this more than I have.

.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #522 9/10 - 9/12/2006
Post by: klaasend on September 12, 2006, 08:45:05 AM
Quote from: "San"
Klaas you are up really early in the morning.

Enjoy your day teaching.

Thanks!


Title: Lively Case Discussion #522 9/10 - 9/12/2006
Post by: Leslie on September 12, 2006, 08:46:33 AM
Any pictures of the ?? year old virgin Jerry?  Maybe Steve borrowed one of his best buds disgusting misogynistic  T-shirts and some women gave  him a knuckle sandwich.  Steve looks like he would do anything for a months supply of booze and cocaine.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #522 9/10 - 9/12/2006
Post by: San on September 12, 2006, 08:48:21 AM
Quote from: "Leslie"
I thought Ruth was the "lucky charm" girl.   I wish the statements were in chronological order also.  On second thought - Steve Croes looks like a bloated drunkard.  I wish we had the ability to edit.  
Before going to C&C's, Ruth was the lucky charm girl but afterward Joran said that Natalee was.  Why?  Did he think that would explain how they  met without him looking like the aggressor and also show what a generous guy he was?  
Who was he thinking/talking about in the car on the way to C&C's - Ruth or Natalee?

I often think of that also Leslie.  He says he was interested in another girl on Greta but was he really targeting Natalee per Paulus' instructions.  He thought that him saying Natalee said to him he was his lucky charm was going to paint a different picture of him.  We all know that was not the truth (Casino tape) because Natalee didn't even look at him or pay any attention to him.  I bet they were pretty pissed off when those videos turned up showing the sporter and his pervert father at the table.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #522 9/10 - 9/12/2006
Post by: Anna on September 12, 2006, 08:48:50 AM
Quote from: "San"
[OMG he looks disgusting.

Does anyone think if they ever found this guy dead that they would pin the whole thing on him.  I also feel the same way for the Kalpoe brothers.


His right eye is just about swollen shut.  The eyelid is thick it is not just that he is blinking or holding them that way, it is the eyelid itself.  Make the photo very large if you have the IE with the zoom at the bottom.  

He is likely to be found dead at this rate for he looks much worse than even Koen.  Much!  

So yeah, if he drinks/drugs himself to death, guess who will become the guilty party pronto?  He needs some lab work done right away if all that swelling is just from booze and he has not been in a fight or something.

.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #522 9/10 - 9/12/2006
Post by: San on September 12, 2006, 08:52:32 AM
Quote from: "Leslie"
Any pictures of the ?? year old virgin Jerry?  Maybe Steve borrowed one of his best buds disgusting misogynistic  T-shirts and some women gave  him a knuckle sandwich.  Steve looks like he would do anything for a months supply of booze and cocaine.

I agree that Steve is heavily into drugs.  I said this from the beginning that he was a drug dealer.  I wonder who is Steve's main drug supplier on the island.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #522 9/10 - 9/12/2006
Post by: San on September 12, 2006, 08:58:02 AM
Quote from: "Anna"
Quote from: "San"
[OMG he looks disgusting.

Does anyone think if they ever found this guy dead that they would pin the whole thing on him.  I also feel the same way for the Kalpoe brothers.


His right eye is just about swollen shut.  The eyelid is thick it is not just that he is blinking or holding them that way, it is the eyelid itself.  Make the photo very large if you have the IE with the zoom at the bottom.  

He is likely to be found dead at this rate for he looks much worse than even Koen.  Much!  

So yeah, if he drinks/drugs himself to death, guess who will become the guilty party pronto?  He needs some lab work done right away if all that swelling is just from booze and he has not been in a fight or something.

.


I agree Anna.

Remember when Kimberly Guilfoyle went to the island and she went to Steve's house.  He came to the gate to answer questions.  We were all like WTF is wrong with him.  Even Kimberly didn't want him to get too close.  Everyone was saying he looked that way because he just got up.  I said to myself no way this guy is into drugs.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #522 9/10 - 9/12/2006
Post by: Anna on September 12, 2006, 09:00:32 AM
.

(http://i15.photobucket.com/albums/a360/AnnaBlueSkies/261fbwz_th.jpg)


How come when Hammer calls them that, no one tells he he should be ashamed and be nice, etc.??   8)


(http://i15.photobucket.com/albums/a360/AnnaBlueSkies/21jy4d3_th-1.gif)

Going to get breakfast!

.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #522 9/10 - 9/12/2006
Post by: msmarple on September 12, 2006, 09:05:44 AM
Quote from: "Anna"
I wish Klaas were here.  Guess it is only 5 a.m. in California.  She is so much better at photos than I am but I could swear I see Steve Croes second from the right in this one.

What's wrong with his eyes??   :shock: If it is him, he looks dreadful.

http://tinyurl.com/m9nhx


I wonder if he is on some sort of cortizone ... ??


Title: Lively Case Discussion #522 9/10 - 9/12/2006
Post by: Spock on September 12, 2006, 09:06:43 AM
Ok guys, who is the common link between Steve Croes and GvC?


Title: Lively Case Discussion #522 9/10 - 9/12/2006
Post by: San on September 12, 2006, 09:11:59 AM
Quote from: "Spock"
Ok guys, who is the common link between Steve Croes and GvC?

I'm going to throw this name out there even though it might not fit.  How about Paulus.  Paulus knows GVC's father and he probably knows Steve from some other illegal activities.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #522 9/10 - 9/12/2006
Post by: klaasend on September 12, 2006, 09:12:36 AM
Quote from: "Spock"
Ok guys, who is the common link between Steve Croes and GvC?

Michael Dompig?  Actually Steve C is closer in age to Lorenzo :shock:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #522 9/10 - 9/12/2006
Post by: San on September 12, 2006, 09:13:46 AM
Quote from: "klaasend"
Quote from: "Spock"
Ok guys, who is the common link between Steve Croes and GvC?

Michael Dompig?  Actually Steve C is closer in age to Lorenzo :shock:

OK I changed my mind I'm going with Klaas' answer :lol:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #522 9/10 - 9/12/2006
Post by: San on September 12, 2006, 09:18:09 AM
Quote from: "San"
Quote from: "klaasend"
Quote from: "Spock"
Ok guys, who is the common link between Steve Croes and GvC?

Michael Dompig?  Actually Steve C is closer in age to Lorenzo :shock:

OK I changed my mind I'm going with Klaas' answer :lol:

Who they say is Joran's half brother and is a major drug dealer.  This is who Steve is running drugs for.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #522 9/10 - 9/12/2006
Post by: klaasend on September 12, 2006, 09:20:10 AM
Quote from: "San"
Quote from: "San"
Quote from: "klaasend"
Quote from: "Spock"
Ok guys, who is the common link between Steve Croes and GvC?

Michael Dompig?  Actually Steve C is closer in age to Lorenzo :shock:

OK I changed my mind I'm going with Klaas' answer :lol:

Who they say is Joran's half brother and is a major drug dealer.  This is who Steve is running drugs for.

Can you tell Lorenzo still bothers me?  :wink:

Ok, I need to stop posting this morning and get ready.  See you all later.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #522 9/10 - 9/12/2006
Post by: cubbeegirl on September 12, 2006, 09:25:39 AM
Good morning monkeyfaces! Had a busy day yesterday and yesterday evening so it looks as if I have some interesting reading to catch up on.
Just wanted to poke my head in and say hi to everyone before I get involved in playing catch up!!!


Title: Lively Case Discussion #522 9/10 - 9/12/2006
Post by: Leslie on September 12, 2006, 09:36:25 AM
I don't find most of the Aruban men attractive.  There are only two that I find, in any way, appealing - Jossy Mansur (but he is married) and Guido Wever (but he is gay).   I question more and more - what is the allure of Aruba?  
Lorenzo van Rijn was a disc jockey (the truth, who knows?) so he might be Steve's friend/drug supplier and owned a beachfront home (the truth who knows) and might have had dealings with GVC.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #522 9/10 - 9/12/2006
Post by: Anna on September 12, 2006, 09:42:15 AM
.
I am actually eating grits and eggs right now.   :D

How about Koen?  They all seem to be into aquatics.

.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #522 9/10 - 9/12/2006
Post by: Anna on September 12, 2006, 09:44:59 AM
.
Did Spock leave?  

Maybe it is Satish?

There is a significant storm moving across Alabama now so will probably lose most Alabama posters at least for a while.  So far only wind but I am sure it is going to get worse from the looks of the radar map.

.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #522 9/10 - 9/12/2006
Post by: Anna on September 12, 2006, 09:46:54 AM
.
No, Satish said he did not even know S Croes so not him.

Back to Koen or how about Freddie??

.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #522 9/10 - 9/12/2006
Post by: klaasend on September 12, 2006, 09:48:16 AM
Easywriter - if you get a chance could you ask your friend about this article in todays Diario - it appears to be regarding a school in San Nicolas, internet porn and 11 and 13yr olds:

http://www.diario-aruba.com/2006/9/12/

Cabesante di school di San Nicolas decepciona:ALUMNONAN A HACI USO DI INTERNET NA BIBLIOTECA PA SUBI WEBSITE PORNO

ORANJESTAD (AAN) -- DIARIO a haya invitacion di e cabesante di un school di San Nicolas, kende kier a relata riba cierto desaroyo negativo cu a tuma lugar siman pasa, den cual algun di su alumnonan, cu ta den edad di 11 pa 13 aña ta envolvi.

E kier alerta mayornan pa nan ta mas pendiente di locual nan yiunan ta haci, ora nan bisa cu nan ta bay Biblioteca pa subi internet pa haci un opdracht di school.

Mester aclarea di biaha cu no tur mucha cu ta bisa nan mayornan cu ta bay Biblioteca Nacional, pa haci uso di internet pa cosnan di school ta gaña, pasobra esey no ta e caso, y hopi ta comporta nan mes debidamente y ta bishita centro di informacion pa busca e informacion cu realmente nan mester.

E RELATO: Durante cu DIARIO tabata cerca e cabesante di school el a yama cuatro, di e seis muchanan envolvi, y cu ta cinco mucha homber di cual un no a bay school ayera, y un mucha muher cu ta esun cu a “bati alarma” pero cu tampoco tabata presente.

Tur cos a cuminza ora cu e mucha muher a mustra su amiganan den klas, e potretnan di muchanan homber cu e conoce y cu el a baha for di internet. E ora ey un di e muchanan homber den clas a reclama puntre ki mishi el haci esey cu su potret, y debi cu e hobencita a interumpi e les, juffrouw a hala su atencion y mande cerca e cabesante.

E ora ey e mucha muher a reclama y a bisa cu e solamente a baha potret di algun mucha homber cu e conoce, pero cu e mucha homber cu a habri boca si no a conta kico e mes cu otro muchanan di school ta haci ora nan bishita Biblioteca Nacional, unda nan ta bay wak pornografia.

E hobencita a conta e cabesante y su maestra cu e dia cu el a baha e potretnan for di internet, el a ripara cu e muchanan homber tabata wak algo, y cu su mes ruman tabata aden. E ora ey el a acerca nan y a mira cu ta pornografia nan ta wak, y el a bisa su ruman pa e hala un banda y pa nan bay cas, pasobra locual nan ta haciendo no ta bon, y ora nan a yega cas el a conta su mama kico a sosode.

VERSION DI E MUCHANAN HOMBER: E muchanan homber a duna dilanti di DIARIO nan version. Specialmente esun mas grandi (13) a laga sa cu el a bay Biblioteca pa usa internet pero no pa busca pornografia, mientras cu otro di su amigonan a bisa cu el a bay pa wak cosnan di auto. Pero un homber adulto cu tabata tey a lanta di su asiento bin cerca nan cu un papel skirbi, cu un website, y a bisa nan pa habri esey. Segun version di e alumno el a puntre kico esey tin aden, anto e homber a contesta “no worry” djis habrie.

Ora el a bay na e website el a topa cu cosnan di sex (pornografia). E ora ey, segun’e, el a puntra e meneer cu ta traha na Biblioteca cu ta sinta tras di computer y cu tambe ta saca copia, si e mag drenta den website ey, si e mag wak porno y cu e meneer a bise cu si mag, y ora nan tabata wak esaki e mucha muher a ripara y a bisa nan pa stop, y ademas a bay bisa e meneer di Biblioteca.

E declaracion aki di e muchanan a indigna e cabesante di school profundamente, ya cu na prome instancia e no a culpa e muchanan directamente sino e adultonan entre otro e mayornan cu no ta duna nan e guia debi, hendenan manera e supuesto lector cu a pone den nan man un website di e indole aki, y e personal di Biblioteca den sentido cu e ta puntra su mes si berdad ta asina cu un trahador lo permiti pa e mucha homber aki drenta den un pagina di sex, y unda e control interno a keda.

DIARIO a bishita Biblioteca Nacional San Nicolas, unda nos a haya un version totalmente diferente. Den articulo apart mayornan specialmente, por lesa riba esaki.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #522 9/10 - 9/12/2006
Post by: 2NJSons_Mom on September 12, 2006, 10:08:00 AM
Good morning.  Have been reading and the discussion about the Marriott stirred my attention.  Just yesterday my brother called and spoke of vacation time shares & the Marriott plan came up.  I was doing some searches that didn't dig up much, but did find one TripAdvisor review that I believe was posted here, earlier...it's one negative amongst many positive ones.  My thoughts were on our discussions here about whether the VDS's had a condominium in that area, and if true, could it be a time share in that resort rather than something outside the hotel area.  Anyway, here is the review:  

Traveler rating:
Palm/Eagle Beach: Marriott's Aruba Ocean Club: "Thefts common in Aruba hotels (Marriott Resort)"
Jun 7, 2005:  A TripAdvisor Member, New Jersey  


This was our first time to Aruba- we stayed at the Marriott Ocean Club.

Within 2 hours of checking in, someone had broken into our room from the rear window (between 7-9pm, which was still daylight), and stolen my laptop, video camera, and other items. The path behind the window was certainly not "lonely", so how could someone know which room to break into and walk out with the stuff raises serious doubts about the hotel staff.

When the front desk was alerted about this, it seemed like this was a common occurrence- they took their time calling security, very casual about the incident, and we never saw the hotel manager at all.

Later on, we learnt that several of my friends had their cars broken into in Aruba, and hotel staff said that thefts were common in Aruba.

I decided to write about my incident when I also read in the news about the missing American teenager in Aruba this week.

So, please be VERY careful about your belongings. It is safer to be on the higher floors of the hotel and not the ground floor to avoid people breaking into your room from the window or balcony (if they can break into Marriott hotels in broad daylight, what is to prevent them from coming in with a knife later in the night)?

A bit about the hotel (Marriott Ocean Club):

The hotel is nice, but the hotel staff needs a serious lesson in manners. They are rude beginning from the people at the entrance to the people at the front desk. Their attitude is one of arrogance, and I suspect they know that once a tourist comes there, they really have no option but to finish their stay there.

All/most rooms are "ocean view", and there is a big difference in "ocean view" and "ocean front". If you can lean out of your room and see the ocean, well, that is "ocean view". So it would be wise to drop your expectations of "facing the ocean" from an "ocean view" room.

http://tinyurl.com/gmde6


Title: Lively Case Discussion #522 9/10 - 9/12/2006
Post by: Peaches on September 12, 2006, 10:24:56 AM
Quote from: "Spock"
Ok guys, who is the common link between Steve Croes and GvC?


The guy who makes the donuts?


Title: Lively Case Discussion #522 9/10 - 9/12/2006
Post by: Peaches on September 12, 2006, 10:27:13 AM
Good morning.  All caught up and it's time to head to the oral surgeon.  

Laughing gas here I come!  

Love to all.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #522 9/10 - 9/12/2006
Post by: Anna on September 12, 2006, 10:52:42 AM
2NJMom,
Will you post that in the Murder and Crime in Aruba thread?  If you like MsMarple or I will copy and paste it there.  But it is yet more crime and we are collecting all we can find.

Thanks for posting that.


.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #522 9/10 - 9/12/2006
Post by: Anna on September 12, 2006, 10:55:06 AM
Quote from: "msmarple"
[
I wonder if he is on some sort of cortizone ... ??


Probably about 80 proof?   :roll:

If he were to be, then he would have been told not to drink and obviously he does.  I think somebody punched him.  Would really like to know.

Maybe Easy could ask Jossy if he has heard of Steve Croes being involved in an auto accident or assaulted?

.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #522 9/10 - 9/12/2006
Post by: 2NJSons_Mom on September 12, 2006, 11:07:25 AM
Quote from: "Anna"
2NJMom,
Will you post that in the Murder and Crime in Aruba thread?  If you like MsMarple or I will copy and paste it there.  But it is yet more crime and we are collecting all we can find.

Thanks for posting that.


.


I just posted it there.  It's nice to ask a good question, find something new or old to post.  We've all read and discussed so much.  

Good to see you posting.  :)


Title: Lively Case Discussion #522 9/10 - 9/12/2006
Post by: Kimmy53 on September 12, 2006, 11:11:13 AM
Good Morning all -

Good luck at the dentist Peaches - I agree - that laughing gas is worth it's weight in gold!! (that doesn't make sense does it!lol)

So what is up this a.m?  

I have to agree with ya'll - Steve C. does look strung out.  Maybe he has some problems that are haunting him????


Title: Lively Case Discussion #522 9/10 - 9/12/2006
Post by: Ono on September 12, 2006, 11:45:55 AM
Quote from: "Leslie"
I don't find most of the Aruban men attractive.  There are only two that I find, in any way, appealing - Jossy Mansur (but he is married) and Guido Wever (but he is gay).   I question more and more - what is the allure of Aruba?  
Lorenzo van Rijn was a disc jockey (the truth, who knows?) so he might be Steve's friend/drug supplier and owned a beachfront home (the truth who knows) and might have had dealings with GVC.


I thought Jossy's son, Eduardo was gorgeous ~ remember seeing him? He was also in the Dr. Phil's audience. But I agree, I don't find the others very appealing. In fact, they look scuzzy.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #522 9/10 - 9/12/2006
Post by: Ono on September 12, 2006, 11:53:54 AM
To me, Steve Croes looks like he has been hittin' the sauce for a very long time, but now, since Natalee, more than ever....trying to forget bad things Steve ? That kid has an alcoholic face..those circles under his eyes are deep. I bet his kidneys are in bad shape.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #522 9/10 - 9/12/2006
Post by: the big hammer on September 12, 2006, 11:54:09 AM
Steve Croes at C&C's...

Spock writes: "Has everyone else noticed that Deepak declared that Steve Croes was at C&C the same time Joran, Satish, Deepak and Natalee were? Doesn't it make more sense now that Steve acted as a witness to the security guard drop-off lie."

Yes, Spock, good catch.

The sleeping night watchman of Tatoo seems to be neglecting his duties.

As a complete fabrication of actually "seeing" the HI drop off which never happened, IMO, this strongly suggests a second vehicle could be in the mix here.

How did Steve get to C&C's is an important question to answer.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #522 9/10 - 9/12/2006
Post by: San on September 12, 2006, 11:57:49 AM
Quote from: "the big hammer"
Steve Croes at C&C's...

Spock writes: "Has everyone else noticed that Deepak declared that Steve Croes was at C&C the same time Joran, Satish, Deepak and Natalee were? Doesn't it make more sense now that Steve acted as a witness to the security guard drop-off lie."

Yes, Spock, good catch.

The sleeping night watchman of Tatoo seems to be neglecting his duties.

As a complete fabrication of actually "seeing" the HI drop off which never happened, IMO, this strongly suggests a second vehicle could be in the mix here.

How did Steve get to C&C's is an important question to answer.

Is Steve Croes hanging out with GVC that particular night?  We have the picture of Steve and GVC together.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #522 9/10 - 9/12/2006
Post by: msmarple on September 12, 2006, 12:04:00 PM
Off topic, but I'm sure Inquiring Minds Want to Know -- Britney delivers again.

From gawker.com:
The National Enquirer reports that the poptard gave birth by Cesarean; the baby was born at 2 AM today, just narrowly avoiding a cursed birthday (as if being her kid weren't cursed enough). Sources report that Britney was pregnant with her third child as of 9 AM this morning.

<end>


Title: Lively Case Discussion #522 9/10 - 9/12/2006
Post by: Ono on September 12, 2006, 12:04:16 PM
Steve's transportation source: Out of the many pictures we have seen of Steve Croes, who is he seen with the most, and if there is someone, is Steve still seen with him/her after Natalee ?


Title: Lively Case Discussion #522 9/10 - 9/12/2006
Post by: blah on September 12, 2006, 12:17:16 PM
Quote from: "msmarple"
Off topic, but I'm sure Inquiring Minds Want to Know -- Britney delivers again.

From gawker.com:
The National Enquirer reports that the poptard gave birth by Cesarean; the baby was born at 2 AM today, just narrowly avoiding a cursed birthday (as if being her kid weren't cursed enough). Sources report that Britney was pregnant with her third child as of 9 AM this morning.

<end>


didnt that piece of trash just get arrested for drunk driving?  Or was that someone else?


Title: Lively Case Discussion #522 9/10 - 9/12/2006
Post by: mrs. red on September 12, 2006, 12:26:07 PM
Quote from: "blah"
Quote from: "msmarple"
Off topic, but I'm sure Inquiring Minds Want to Know -- Britney delivers again.

From gawker.com:
The National Enquirer reports that the poptard gave birth by Cesarean; the baby was born at 2 AM today, just narrowly avoiding a cursed birthday (as if being her kid weren't cursed enough). Sources report that Britney was pregnant with her third child as of 9 AM this morning.

<end>


didnt that piece of trash just get arrested for drunk driving?  Or was that someone else?


nope, that'd be the other trash, the illustrious Paris Hilton...


Title: Lively Case Discussion #522 9/10 - 9/12/2006
Post by: mrs. red on September 12, 2006, 12:27:39 PM
Quote from: "klaasend"
Yes, this is Steve.  Too bad the watermark is right in front of his face.  His eyes are looking real puffy lately, he looks terrible.  Has for the last few weeks:

(http://i14.photobucket.com/albums/a306/klaasend/SteveC.jpg)


I think he looks like he was in a fight....


Title: Lively Case Discussion #522 9/10 - 9/12/2006
Post by: friend of monkeys on September 12, 2006, 12:33:57 PM
me too....looks like he got hit hard.

did something happen in aruba re the 3  since yesterday?  should i read front page?  k...i willl....i only have a few min.....ty


Title: Lively Case Discussion #522 9/10 - 9/12/2006
Post by: San on September 12, 2006, 12:34:58 PM
(http://i34.photobucket.com/albums/d118/Sanddrops/Beth.jpg)

Missing teen's mother speaks to Pueblo students

It's been more than a year since Alabama teenager Natalee Holloway disappeared during a graduation trip to Aruba. Her story captured national attention for months. On Monday, her mother, Beth Twitty, spoke to students in Pueblo.
 
She spoke to a group of high school seniors from Pueblo West and Rye, telling them to always have a safety plan when traveling outside the country. "We know it's too late for Natalee, and I know it's too late for me," said Twitty. "But there are 27 million Americans that travel internationally every year, and it's not too late for them."
 
Twitty has partnered with the International Safe Travels Foundation to tour the country and raise awareness about the issue.
 
She says she continues to investigate what happened to her daughter.
Posted By: Aaron Inver  (Updated: 9/12/2006 7:24:48 AM)

There is also a video below is the link:

http://www.koaa.com/news/view.asp?ID=5634


Title: Lively Case Discussion #522 9/10 - 9/12/2006
Post by: friend of monkeys on September 12, 2006, 12:39:43 PM
TY SAN

BETH has made alot of people think twice about where they go and with whom....she has saved lives of so many women and young girls  she will never know personally.....     in light of her tragedy she has shined so much light.  Prayers for Natalee and her family.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #522 9/10 - 9/12/2006
Post by: San on September 12, 2006, 12:41:16 PM
THE SELMA TIMES-JOURNAL

Response to letter about Twitty


Monday, September 11, 2006 8:53 PM CDT

 
To the Editor:

One of your readers last week asserted that Beth Holloway Twitty stretched the truth when she told her Judson audience that she'd not eaten, slept or bathed during her first 118 hours in Aruba in June 2005. I was in the audience that day and I think this critic missed the point entirely.

Mrs. Twitty didn't mean to imply she might not have eaten a bite of something or fallen asleep for a few minutes from sheer exhaustion. She was talking about how her normal daily activities meant very little in the quest to find her missing daughter. Perhaps she had a meeting in a restaurant - so what? Her point was that her frustration and sense of loss brought her to find a place of worship where God gave her peace.

Mrs. Twitty normally speaks to law-enforcement groups and talks about security issues and international law. Our invitation at Judson was for her to talk about her faith. She did a marvelous job and was very inspirational.

 
Critics of Mrs. Twitty should remember two things. First, she never sought the spotlight - she and her family led quiet lives until their world was turned upside down last year. Now they admit they seek the media spotlight in the hope that someone will hear or see and come forward with information. Natalee's father, Dave Holloway, says this quite clearly in his book.

And second, how is one supposed to act when their daughter is abducted and possibly killed? Is there a handbook that tells you what to do? I think it's easy for us outsiders to make judgments, but the fact remains that we've not been there. We who haven't walked a mile in Mrs. Twitty's shoes should be reluctant to criticize her.

The writer characterized Aruba as a peaceful island unworthy of a boycott. Perhaps most Arubans are peaceful, but their police force obviously watches "The Keystone Kops" training films. And the boycott is endorsed by the governors of Alabama, Georgia and Arkansas.

If I ever got in deep trouble, Beth Twitty is the kind of friend I'd want in my corner. She's an American hero.

Michael J. Brooks

Marion

Link to article:  http://tinyurl.com/h4dw5


Title: Lively Case Discussion #522 9/10 - 9/12/2006
Post by: blah on September 12, 2006, 12:43:46 PM
Quote from: "mrs. red"
Quote from: "blah"
Quote from: "msmarple"
Off topic, but I'm sure Inquiring Minds Want to Know -- Britney delivers again.

From gawker.com:
The National Enquirer reports that the poptard gave birth by Cesarean; the baby was born at 2 AM today, just narrowly avoiding a cursed birthday (as if being her kid weren't cursed enough). Sources report that Britney was pregnant with her third child as of 9 AM this morning.

<end>


didnt that piece of trash just get arrested for drunk driving?  Or was that someone else?


nope, that'd be the other trash, the illustrious Paris Hilton...


i guess that shows how much attention I pay to this type of so called "news"


 :roll:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #522 9/10 - 9/12/2006
Post by: msmarple on September 12, 2006, 12:46:39 PM
Quote from: "blah"
Quote from: "mrs. red"
Quote from: "blah"
Quote from: "msmarple"
Off topic, but I'm sure Inquiring Minds Want to Know -- Britney delivers again.

From gawker.com:
The National Enquirer reports that the poptard gave birth by Cesarean; the baby was born at 2 AM today, just narrowly avoiding a cursed birthday (as if being her kid weren't cursed enough). Sources report that Britney was pregnant with her third child as of 9 AM this morning.

<end>


didnt that piece of trash just get arrested for drunk driving?  Or was that someone else?


nope, that'd be the other trash, the illustrious Paris Hilton...


i guess that shows how much attention I pay to this type of so called "news"

Well, really, I only "liked" it because of what I have now bolded.  :wink:


 :roll:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #522 9/10 - 9/12/2006
Post by: msmarple on September 12, 2006, 12:47:21 PM
Ooops, sorry Blah - I messed up the quote.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #522 9/10 - 9/12/2006
Post by: blah on September 12, 2006, 12:48:07 PM
Quote from: "msmarple"
Quote from: "blah"
Quote from: "mrs. red"
Quote from: "blah"
Quote from: "msmarple"
Off topic, but I'm sure Inquiring Minds Want to Know -- Britney delivers again.

From gawker.com:
The National Enquirer reports that the poptard gave birth by Cesarean; the baby was born at 2 AM today, just narrowly avoiding a cursed birthday (as if being her kid weren't cursed enough). Sources report that Britney was pregnant with her third child as of 9 AM this morning.

<end>


didnt that piece of trash just get arrested for drunk driving?  Or was that someone else?


nope, that'd be the other trash, the illustrious Paris Hilton...


i guess that shows how much attention I pay to this type of so called "news"

Well, really, I only "liked" it because of what I have now bolded.  :wink:


 :roll:


now thats hillarious !!! (and probably true  :lol: )


Title: Lively Case Discussion #522 9/10 - 9/12/2006
Post by: friend of monkeys on September 12, 2006, 12:49:27 PM
i meant to say "in spite of of her tragedy"...but i know u all got me...


Title: Lively Case Discussion #522 9/10 - 9/12/2006
Post by: Anna on September 12, 2006, 01:05:24 PM
Quote from: "San"
THE SELMA TIMES-JOURNAL

Response to letter about Twitty


Monday, September 11, 2006 8:53 PM CDT

 
To the Editor:

One of your readers last week asserted that Beth Holloway Twitty stretched the truth when she told her Judson audience that she'd not eaten, slept or bathed during her first 118 hours in Aruba in June 2005. I was in the audience that day and I think this critic missed the point entirely.

Mrs. Twitty didn't mean to imply she might not have eaten a bite of something or fallen asleep for a few minutes from sheer exhaustion. She was talking about how her normal daily activities meant very little in the quest to find her missing daughter. Perhaps she had a meeting in a restaurant - so what? Her point was that her frustration and sense of loss brought her to find a place of worship where God gave her peace.

Mrs. Twitty normally speaks to law-enforcement groups and talks about security issues and international law. Our invitation at Judson was for her to talk about her faith. She did a marvelous job and was very inspirational.

 
Critics of Mrs. Twitty should remember two things. First, she never sought the spotlight - she and her family led quiet lives until their world was turned upside down last year. Now they admit they seek the media spotlight in the hope that someone will hear or see and come forward with information. Natalee's father, Dave Holloway, says this quite clearly in his book.

And second, how is one supposed to act when their daughter is abducted and possibly killed? Is there a handbook that tells you what to do? I think it's easy for us outsiders to make judgments, but the fact remains that we've not been there. We who haven't walked a mile in Mrs. Twitty's shoes should be reluctant to criticize her.

The writer characterized Aruba as a peaceful island unworthy of a boycott. Perhaps most Arubans are peaceful, but their police force obviously watches "The Keystone Kops" training films. And the boycott is endorsed by the governors of Alabama, Georgia and Arkansas.

If I ever got in deep trouble, Beth Twitty is the kind of friend I'd want in my corner. She's an American hero.

Michael J. Brooks

Marion

Link to article:  http://tinyurl.com/h4dw5



Oh, San, this makes me so happy.  I copied it as I do not want SB and others to miss it as it will mean so much to them as well.  And it is NOT a monkey but someone from where she spoke!  

This is just wonderful and I do hope Charlie Rat sees it!!   :D  :D  :D


.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #522 9/10 - 9/12/2006
Post by: Anna on September 12, 2006, 01:07:56 PM
.
Did I miss it?  Who is the connection between Steve Croes and GVC?    Doesn't Steve have a car, a black one of some sort?

.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #522 9/10 - 9/12/2006
Post by: MisGivings on September 12, 2006, 01:09:20 PM
Quote from: "klaasend"
O/T - this Nassau newspaper has a little more information regarding the death of Anna Nicole's son:

http://www.thenassauguardian.com/national_local/41348138042629.php
(snipped)
Daniel Smith, son of the model and actress, reportedly suffered a "massive heart attack" on the maternity ward in Doctors Hospital, sources revealed. Police officials were tight-lipped about the incident and would not confirm nor deny the identity of the deceased
(snipped)


His Dad was Howard K. Stern. :shock:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #522 9/10 - 9/12/2006
Post by: Lala'sMom on September 12, 2006, 01:18:40 PM
Hello everyone.  Just a quick post here to tell those who wanted to know that CP405 is allright.  She's had her precious grandbaby with her for the past week.  I think maybe she has been a bit under the weather also.  Maybe she will check in with us later.  Nemo is fine too.  :wink:


BTW connection between SC and the others...Freddy?   Lorenzo?  Porn videos?  Keep thinking monkeys.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #522 9/10 - 9/12/2006
Post by: San on September 12, 2006, 01:19:19 PM
Quote from: "Anna"
.
Did I miss it?  Who is the connection between Steve Croes and GVC?    Doesn't Steve have a car, a black one of some sort?

.

Well if you missed it then I missed it also because I didn't see an answer.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #522 9/10 - 9/12/2006
Post by: MisGivings on September 12, 2006, 01:20:09 PM
Quote from: "blah"
Quote from: "msmarple"
Off topic, but I'm sure Inquiring Minds Want to Know -- Britney delivers again.

From gawker.com:
The National Enquirer reports that the poptard gave birth by Cesarean; the baby was born at 2 AM today, just narrowly avoiding a cursed birthday (as if being her kid weren't cursed enough). Sources report that Britney was pregnant with her third child as of 9 AM this morning.

<end>


didnt that piece of trash just get arrested for drunk driving?  Or was that someone else?


Hmmm, maybe I am not awake yet, but I read this to say; Brittany had a baby at 2am and is already pregnant again at 9am???


Title: Lively Case Discussion #522 9/10 - 9/12/2006
Post by: San on September 12, 2006, 01:23:39 PM
Quote from: "mrs. red"
Quote from: "klaasend"
Yes, this is Steve.  Too bad the watermark is right in front of his face.  His eyes are looking real puffy lately, he looks terrible.  Has for the last few weeks:

(http://i14.photobucket.com/albums/a306/klaasend/SteveC.jpg)


I think he looks like he was in a fight....

I think he's a skank and I can't stand looking at his long fingernails that POS.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #522 9/10 - 9/12/2006
Post by: MisGivings on September 12, 2006, 01:27:59 PM
Quote from: "San"
Quote from: "mrs. red"
Quote from: "klaasend"
Yes, this is Steve.  Too bad the watermark is right in front of his face.  His eyes are looking real puffy lately, he looks terrible.  Has for the last few weeks:

(http://i14.photobucket.com/albums/a306/klaasend/SteveC.jpg)


I think he looks like he was in a fight....

I think he's a skank and I can't stand looking at his long fingernails that POS.


During the past few days, I have noticed that Steve & Joran have been coming on line within minutes of each other. I wonder if it is mere coincidence, or if they are chatting about something important?!?

Also, Shizaru mentioned something that will crush the dark side and their beliefs a few days ago. I cannot find it now, and was wondering if anyone else remembered what they were refering to? AND can direct me to it.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #522 9/10 - 9/12/2006
Post by: msmarple on September 12, 2006, 01:43:50 PM
Quote from: "MisGivings"
Quote from: "blah"
Quote from: "msmarple"
Off topic, but I'm sure Inquiring Minds Want to Know -- Britney delivers again.

From gawker.com:
The National Enquirer reports that the poptard gave birth by Cesarean; the baby was born at 2 AM today, just narrowly avoiding a cursed birthday (as if being her kid weren't cursed enough). Sources report that Britney was pregnant with her third child as of 9 AM this morning.

<end>


didnt that piece of trash just get arrested for drunk driving?  Or was that someone else?


Hmmm, maybe I am not awake yet, but I read this to say; Brittany had a baby at 2am and is already pregnant again at 9am???


MisGivings - You're not awake yet; it's a joke. (Well, the 3rd baby part is a joke - we hope.   8)  )


Title: Lively Case Discussion #522 9/10 - 9/12/2006
Post by: MisGivings on September 12, 2006, 02:02:22 PM
Quote from: "Carnut"
Quote from: "Lala'sMom"
Quote from: "SunFreak2"
I wish we knew who it was with her at the Wyndham argueing with her over buying a piece of jewelry.  Has anyone ever confirmed that story and the video or is that just an internet rumor from RU?


It could be a figment of Julia's imagination...did I say that?  Yes, I did.  :lol:


That's what I always thought it was, along with the cabbie blue eyed dutch marine story.


Well, I must admit if I looked like she does, I would be into heavy duty drugs to alter reality also.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #522 9/10 - 9/12/2006
Post by: msmarple on September 12, 2006, 02:15:46 PM
I don't remember who posted this, but Howard K. Stern is Anna Nicole Smith's lawyer - not the deceased son's father.

http://www.tv.msn.com/tv/article.aspx?news=233629&GT1=7703 --
Quote
Daniel Smith, who died Saturday, was the product of Smith's 1985 marriage to Billy Smith.


Title: Ohio Woman Vanishes on Cruise Ship
Post by: MisGivings on September 12, 2006, 02:22:17 PM
Ohio Woman Vanishes on Cruise Ship
On the Record w/ Greta  Tonight, 10pm / 3am ET
A dream vacation turns into a familys worst nightmare after an Ohio woman goes missing from a Carnival Cruise Lines ship  Is it foul play or just another missing person case involving a cruise? Tune in for details.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #522 9/10 - 9/12/2006
Post by: San on September 12, 2006, 02:38:01 PM
Quote from: "MisGivings"

During the past few days, I have noticed that Steve & Joran have been coming on line within minutes of each other. I wonder if it is mere coincidence, or if they are chatting about something important?!?

Also, Shizaru mentioned something that will crush the dark side and their beliefs a few days ago. I cannot find it now, and was wondering if anyone else remembered what they were refering to? AND can direct me to it.

Here is a link:

http://www.scaredmonkeys.net/viewtopic.php?p=46283#46283


Title: Lively Case Discussion #522 9/10 - 9/12/2006
Post by: Peaches on September 12, 2006, 02:44:04 PM
Back from the oral surgeon lest anyone worry.  No drama.  Painful but I got medication for that aspect.

Now due for a nap.......

Catch up with y'all later.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #522 9/10 - 9/12/2006
Post by: San on September 12, 2006, 02:46:34 PM
Quote from: "Peaches"
Back from the oral surgeon lest anyone worry.  No drama.  Painful but I got medication for that aspect.

Now due for a nap.......

Catch up with y'all later.

Glad your back and everything is OK.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #522 9/10 - 9/12/2006
Post by: Kimmy53 on September 12, 2006, 02:49:15 PM
Quote from: "Peaches"
Back from the oral surgeon lest anyone worry.  No drama.  Painful but I got medication for that aspect.

Now due for a nap.......

Catch up with y'all later.


So glad to hear this Peaches... take care and feel better soon!


Title: Lively Case Discussion #522 9/10 - 9/12/2006
Post by: San on September 12, 2006, 02:49:54 PM
Klaas I am happy to inform you that the cag only moved to pages since you were gone :lol:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #522 9/10 - 9/12/2006
Post by: KatzHome on September 12, 2006, 02:51:12 PM
Hey Monkeys ~ what's happenin?  seeesch...  saw only Peaches listed as being on the board...  that slow around here today?

Another hind dropped by Larry Garrison ~ was that discussed earlier and should I read back to see?  I couldn't watch the video ~ Internet Explorer is no longer being made for the Mac ~ and the old IE browser that I have isn't good enough for the video.... :?  :roll:

Do the Windows people think that the inconvenience of not being able to see their videos will be what it takes to make me give up my Mac and start doing Windows???  If they do, they must be high...


Title: Lively Case Discussion #522 9/10 - 9/12/2006
Post by: KatzHome on September 12, 2006, 02:53:24 PM
hind should be hint...  I can't wait 'till we hear who's talking...  and what they're saying...  will it be enough to convict them....


Title: Lively Case Discussion #522 9/10 - 9/12/2006
Post by: San on September 12, 2006, 02:55:54 PM
Quote from: "San"
Klaas I am happy to inform you that the cag only moved two pages since you were gone :lol:

Self edited.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #522 9/10 - 9/12/2006
Post by: KatzHome on September 12, 2006, 02:56:11 PM
Oh cool ~ there's more Monkeys around...  Glad it went well at the dentist for ya, Peaches...  Hi Kimmy ~ Hi San ~ Mis and Ms...  and anyone else who is here...  

 :oops: sorry ~ I didn't look all the way up the page to see who was here...  and saw that San posted that the board only moved 2 pages since Klaas left...  so maybe nobody's here anymore...


Title: Lively Case Discussion #522 9/10 - 9/12/2006
Post by: KatzHome on September 12, 2006, 02:57:35 PM
Quote from: "San"
Quote from: "San"
Klaas I am happy to inform you that the cag only moved two pages since you were gone :lol:

Self edited.


 :lol: {{{hugs}}}  San ~ shoulda let Klaas do it...  ya missed the other one....  but I'll never tell...


Title: Lively Case Discussion #522 9/10 - 9/12/2006
Post by: KatzHome on September 12, 2006, 03:01:52 PM
Quote from: "the big hammer"
Steve Croes at C&C's...

Spock writes: "Has everyone else noticed that Deepak declared that Steve Croes was at C&C the same time Joran, Satish, Deepak and Natalee were? Doesn't it make more sense now that Steve acted as a witness to the security guard drop-off lie."

Yes, Spock, good catch.

The sleeping night watchman of Tatoo seems to be neglecting his duties.

As a complete fabrication of actually "seeing" the HI drop off which never happened, IMO, this strongly suggests a second vehicle could be in the mix here.

How did Steve get to C&C's is an important question to answer.


Yeah ~ and we never heard that before Hammer...  sure does explain why he decided to come forward to "help out his friend"  :roll: That story NEVER made sense to me ~ and I was raising OF's "BS Flag" over it back when I was posting on WS...

Going on memory alone (which isn't all that good) but, wasn't there some talk about a car being seen in the side mirrow of one of the cars from some night...  I'm sorry I'm so vague about it...  Does anyone remember?


Title: Lively Case Discussion #522 9/10 - 9/12/2006
Post by: KatzHome on September 12, 2006, 03:07:49 PM
Quote from: "spooky112483"
Brian Clark civilian rescuer on 9/11 said "your friends are people you have experiances with" so true. that is why we are all friends here. we have been through this experiance concerning Natalee. we have all been here for Natalee and we will continue to be here for Natalee until there is justice for Natalee. But we have all become friends too in this experiance. Natalee's legacy lives on in each and every one of us that keeps speaking her name. You all are so beautiful for keeping Natalee's name alive and the case going. We will get justice for Natalee. I believe it deep inside me.
My love to all of you.


And sending my love back to you, Spook...  even though I missed you posting ~ it's still so good to see you here!  {{{hugs}}}


Title: Lively Case Discussion #522 9/10 - 9/12/2006
Post by: Sue on September 12, 2006, 03:08:21 PM
Quote from: "KatzHome"
Hey Monkeys ~ what's happenin?  seeesch...  saw only Peaches listed as being on the board...  that slow around here today?

Another hind dropped by Larry Garrison ~ was that discussed earlier and should I read back to see?  I couldn't watch the video ~ Internet Explorer is no longer being made for the Mac ~ and the old IE browser that I have isn't good enough for the video.... :?  :roll:

Do the Windows people think that the inconvenience of not being able to see their videos will be what it takes to make me give up my Mac and start doing Windows???  If they do, they must be high...



Ok I am reading back and trying to find where Larry Garrison dropped another hint, What was that hint ???


Title: Lively Case Discussion #522 9/10 - 9/12/2006
Post by: KatzHome on September 12, 2006, 03:11:53 PM
I picked that up from the Front Page, Sue...


Title: Lively Case Discussion #522 9/10 - 9/12/2006
Post by: KatzHome on September 12, 2006, 03:12:57 PM
Larrry Garrison, “THE NEWSBREAKER” … Deep Throat in the Natalee Holloway Case???
Larry Garrison while interviewed this morning on NBC’s “The Today Show”, discussing his new book, the NEWSBREAKER, made some interesting comments regarding Mark Karr in the JonBenet Ramsey case and the Natalee Holloway case.

The NEWSBREAKER is all about the behind the scenes news and never been told stories of the biggest “Oh My God factor” stories of the past decade.

Seems that John Mark Karr wants to talk and he wants to speak out more on the case event hough he has been ruled out as a suspect.

Also Larry Garrison referenced that there is a “Deep Throat” coming forward with information. Hmm … Larry says he is doing his due diligence. “He is bringing up old names”. Guess we will have to wait and see.

Watch the VIDEO

September 12th, 2006 at 12:54pm


Title: Lively Case Discussion #522 9/10 - 9/12/2006
Post by: Kimmy53 on September 12, 2006, 03:13:32 PM
Hi Katz!!!!!

Sue, I don't know - I must have missed it about Larry G  I do know he was on - I think - Today SHow....


Title: Lively Case Discussion #522 9/10 - 9/12/2006
Post by: Jacqueline on September 12, 2006, 03:14:51 PM
http://newsroom.eworldwire.com/view_release.php?id=15502

Anyone see this?

Arubian states that after Natalee disappeared....some in America are treating Arubians as if they are diseased....

Good afternoon Monkeys!


Title: Lively Case Discussion #522 9/10 - 9/12/2006
Post by: Kimmy53 on September 12, 2006, 03:16:16 PM
OOOOO Katz, thanks a bunch.  Today is the 1st day in a while I haven't visited the FP.

I have all along said that someone needs to come forward this way.  I do hope and pray this is true.

In the least I hope it starts Ole Paulus to sweating bullets and JK2 to squirming like the freakin' worms they are!


Title: Lively Case Discussion #522 9/10 - 9/12/2006
Post by: KatzHome on September 12, 2006, 03:18:09 PM
Quote from: "San"
Quote from: "Anna"
.
http://www.diario-aruba.com/gallery/displayimage.php?album=16&pos=8

.

OMG he looks disgusting.

Does anyone think if they ever found this guy dead that they would pin the whole thing on him.  I also feel the same way for the Kalpoe brothers.


Excellent possibility, San...


Title: Lively Case Discussion #522 9/10 - 9/12/2006
Post by: KatzHome on September 12, 2006, 03:19:25 PM
Quote from: "San"
Quote from: "Leslie"
Any pictures of the ?? year old virgin Jerry?  Maybe Steve borrowed one of his best buds disgusting misogynistic  T-shirts and some women gave  him a knuckle sandwich.  Steve looks like he would do anything for a months supply of booze and cocaine.

I agree that Steve is heavily into drugs.  I said this from the beginning that he was a drug dealer.  I wonder who is Steve's main drug supplier on the island.


Oh San!  You **knew** I'd be asking if it was Lorenzo!!!!


Title: Lively Case Discussion #522 9/10 - 9/12/2006
Post by: klaasend on September 12, 2006, 03:19:29 PM
Quote from: "San"
Quote from: "San"
Klaas I am happy to inform you that the cag only moved two pages since you were gone :lol:

Self edited.


Red is happy he didn't have to change the thread too!  :lol:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #522 9/10 - 9/12/2006
Post by: Sue on September 12, 2006, 03:20:22 PM
well I just watched the video from front page, I sure pray this pans out
happy to hear that the names of the 3 suspects and other names are surfacing in this persons conversation.. Very Interesting


Title: Lively Case Discussion #522 9/10 - 9/12/2006
Post by: 2NJSons_Mom on September 12, 2006, 03:21:46 PM
Quote from: "Jacqueline"
http://newsroom.eworldwire.com/view_release.php?id=15502

Anyone see this?

Arubian states that after Natalee disappeared....some in America are treating Arubians as if they are diseased....

Good afternoon Monkeys!


This is the Matthews guy who was involved with Ben King, et al in Aruba.  His wife, I believe is Arianna.  He had been living here since released but got caught up in immigration regulations...(may not be stating all this exactly as it should be, but it's the 'gist' (sp?)... :)


Title: Lively Case Discussion #522 9/10 - 9/12/2006
Post by: KatzHome on September 12, 2006, 03:21:53 PM
Quote from: "San"
Quote from: "Anna"
Quote from: "San"
[OMG he looks disgusting.

Does anyone think if they ever found this guy dead that they would pin the whole thing on him.  I also feel the same way for the Kalpoe brothers.


His right eye is just about swollen shut.  The eyelid is thick it is not just that he is blinking or holding them that way, it is the eyelid itself.  Make the photo very large if you have the IE with the zoom at the bottom.  

He is likely to be found dead at this rate for he looks much worse than even Koen.  Much!  

So yeah, if he drinks/drugs himself to death, guess who will become the guilty party pronto?  He needs some lab work done right away if all that swelling is just from booze and he has not been in a fight or something.

.


I agree Anna.

Remember when Kimberly Guilfoyle went to the island and she went to Steve's house.  He came to the gate to answer questions.  We were all like WTF is wrong with him.  Even Kimberly didn't want him to get too close.  Everyone was saying he looked that way because he just got up.  I said to myself no way this guy is into drugs.


Think he might be the supplier of the drugs that were slipped into Natalee's drink (If something was)  But, I'll bet that there was ~ and I don't gamble unless the odds are REAL good...


Title: Lively Case Discussion #522 9/10 - 9/12/2006
Post by: KatzHome on September 12, 2006, 03:22:54 PM
Quote from: "Kimmy53"
Hi Katz!!!!!

Sue, I don't know - I must have missed it about Larry G  I do know he was on - I think - Today SHow....


Hey Kimmy!  {{{hugs}}}  I'm just reading back ~ only a couple pages behind... glad I popped here to see if there was anyone posting!


Title: Lively Case Discussion #522 9/10 - 9/12/2006
Post by: KatzHome on September 12, 2006, 03:24:02 PM
Quote from: "San"
Quote from: "Spock"
Ok guys, who is the common link between Steve Croes and GvC?

I'm going to throw this name out there even though it might not fit.  How about Paulus.  Paulus knows GVC's father and he probably knows Steve from some other illegal activities.


That's a good toss, San...


Title: Lively Case Discussion #522 9/10 - 9/12/2006
Post by: KatzHome on September 12, 2006, 03:24:36 PM
Quote from: "klaasend"
Quote from: "Spock"
Ok guys, who is the common link between Steve Croes and GvC?

Michael Dompig?  Actually Steve C is closer in age to Lorenzo :shock:


 :D Klaas!  You said Lorenzo's name too!!!!!!


Title: Lively Case Discussion #522 9/10 - 9/12/2006
Post by: KatzHome on September 12, 2006, 03:27:13 PM
Quote from: "San"
Quote from: "klaasend"
Quote from: "Spock"
Ok guys, who is the common link between Steve Croes and GvC?

Michael Dompig?  Actually Steve C is closer in age to Lorenzo :shock:

OK I changed my mind I'm going with Klaas' answer :lol:


I'm on that boat too, San...  I think drugs from Lorenzo is the common denominator...


Title: Lively Case Discussion #522 9/10 - 9/12/2006
Post by: yapperz1 on September 12, 2006, 03:27:55 PM
Katz here's the gist of the video since you can't watch it.

there's a "deep throat" coming forward right now with information as to
basically who did it. we're hoping that it pans out.
this is someone who is very credible. Holland has no idea about it.
he's still bringing up old names. the 3 suspects are still coming up in his
conversations along with other people


Title: Lively Case Discussion #522 9/10 - 9/12/2006
Post by: KatzHome on September 12, 2006, 03:28:02 PM
Quote from: "San"
Quote from: "San"
Quote from: "klaasend"
Quote from: "Spock"
Ok guys, who is the common link between Steve Croes and GvC?

Michael Dompig?  Actually Steve C is closer in age to Lorenzo :shock:

OK I changed my mind I'm going with Klaas' answer :lol:

Who they say is Joran's half brother and is a major drug dealer.  This is who Steve is running drugs for.


I should have read down a little further...  we're on the same page...


Title: Lively Case Discussion #522 9/10 - 9/12/2006
Post by: klaasend on September 12, 2006, 03:28:42 PM
Think I'll watch that video from the front page now myself.  I want to hear what Larry Garrison says.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #522 9/10 - 9/12/2006
Post by: klaasend on September 12, 2006, 03:33:53 PM
Wow, he actually said "deap throat".  Says that JK2 and others are being mentioned by "deap throat".  Hopes to be able to present what he knows in a couple weeks.  GREAT NEWS!


Title: Lively Case Discussion #522 9/10 - 9/12/2006
Post by: KatzHome on September 12, 2006, 03:34:07 PM
Quote from: "Lala'sMom"
Hello everyone.  Just a quick post here to tell those who wanted to know that CP405 is allright.  She's had her precious grandbaby with her for the past week.  I think maybe she has been a bit under the weather also.  Maybe she will check in with us later.  Nemo is fine too.  :wink:


BTW connection between SC and the others...Freddy?   Lorenzo?  Porn videos?  Keep thinking monkeys.


Hi Lalas!  Thanks for the update on CP405 ~ I'm glad she's ok....  anyone hear from Sleuth?

And the connection ~ I'm thinking drugs and Lorenzo....


Title: Lively Case Discussion #522 9/10 - 9/12/2006
Post by: KatzHome on September 12, 2006, 03:37:56 PM
Quote from: "Jacqueline"
http://newsroom.eworldwire.com/view_release.php?id=15502

Anyone see this?

Arubian states that after Natalee disappeared....some in America are treating Arubians as if they are diseased....

Good afternoon Monkeys!


Hi Jacq!  No ~ didn't see that article...  And I hate to say it ~ but if someone told me at the tables that they were from Aruba ~  my brows would at least come together ~ and I'd probably frown...


Title: Lively Case Discussion #522 9/10 - 9/12/2006
Post by: KatzHome on September 12, 2006, 03:40:49 PM
Quote from: "yapperz1"
Katz here's the gist of the video since you can't watch it.

there's a "deep throat" coming forward right now with information as to
basically who did it. we're hoping that it pans out.
this is someone who is very credible. Holland has no idea about it.
he's still bringing up old names. the 3 suspects are still coming up in his
conversations along with other people


Thank you very much, Yapperz!   :oops: Since Klaas posted that she was going to watch the video ~ I was just about to ask her what was on it...  Thank you so very much again ~ now I don't have to...


Title: Lively Case Discussion #522 9/10 - 9/12/2006
Post by: Frijole on September 12, 2006, 03:43:44 PM
Quote from: "yapperz1"
Katz here's the gist of the video since you can't watch it.

there's a "deep throat" coming forward right now with information as to
basically who did it. we're hoping that it pans out.
this is someone who is very credible. Holland has no idea about it.
he's still bringing up old names. the 3 suspects are still coming up in his
conversations along with other people


Wow Yaps - you woke me from my lurking stupor! lol  I'm going to go listen to this too.  

Interesting - once again there is a veil of privacy.... "Deep Throat".... which leads me to believe that there is more to this story than 3 stupid horny teenage boys.  Drugs, coverup, organized crime?  We wouldn't have a "Deep Throat", a Shango, a Simian, etc. etc. without a reason.

I sure hope this pans out.  I'm starting to get really p-ed off.  LOL


Title: Lively Case Discussion #522 9/10 - 9/12/2006
Post by: thik on September 12, 2006, 03:47:45 PM
Quote from: "Frijole"
Quote from: "yapperz1"
Katz here's the gist of the video since you can't watch it.

there's a "deep throat" coming forward right now with information as to
basically who did it. we're hoping that it pans out.
this is someone who is very credible. Holland has no idea about it.
he's still bringing up old names. the 3 suspects are still coming up in his
conversations along with other people


Wow Yaps - you woke me from my lurking stupor! lol  I'm going to go listen to this too.  

Interesting - once again there is a veil of privacy.... "Deep Throat".... which leads me to believe that there is more to this story than 3 stupid horny teenage boys.  Drugs, coverup, organized crime?  We wouldn't have a "Deep Throat", a Shango, a Simian, etc. etc. without a reason.

I sure hope this pans out.  I'm starting to get really p-ed off.  LOL



Speaking of that,,,, is it just me, or does Croes look like he's pee'd his pants in that classy picture ???


Title: Lively Case Discussion #522 9/10 - 9/12/2006
Post by: KatzHome on September 12, 2006, 03:48:44 PM
Last night, when I was leaving work, one of the Security Guards and I were talking about why no one has come forward, Beaner...

Both of us tend to think it's because of fear of reprisal..


Title: Lively Case Discussion #522 9/10 - 9/12/2006
Post by: Frijole on September 12, 2006, 03:58:53 PM
Quote from: "KatzHome"
Last night, when I was leaving work, one of the Security Guards and I were talking about why no one has come forward, Beaner...

Both of us tend to think it's because of fear of reprisal..


reprisal... or death!? i think there are some nasty folks involved.  Not sure if they had anything to do with Natalee or if they were just a part of the cover up that ensued...  Man the mini series on this will be like 4 months long.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #522 9/10 - 9/12/2006
Post by: Frijole on September 12, 2006, 04:02:34 PM
I can't watch the video because it wants me to download IE7.  I don't even use IE... grrrrr  Will deal with it later - gotta be in the mood ya know? ha.

Thik- re the photo of Croes - you talking about the one this a.m.where he looks like he is on crack cocaine or Meth?   :lol:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #522 9/10 - 9/12/2006
Post by: Hotshot on September 12, 2006, 04:11:41 PM
Quote from: "Lala'sMom"
Hello everyone.  Just a quick post here to tell those who wanted to know that CP405 is allright.  She's had her precious grandbaby with her for the past week.  I think maybe she has been a bit under the weather also.  Maybe she will check in with us later.  Nemo is fine too.  :wink:


BTW connection between SC and the others...Freddy?   Lorenzo?  Porn videos?  Keep thinking monkeys.

The only thing I can tell you is, Steve told me Lorenzo used to work at the Bahia as a DJ.  Thats the one thing they have in common.  Oh, and they all go there might be another thing in common


Title: Lively Case Discussion #522 9/10 - 9/12/2006
Post by: NM on September 12, 2006, 04:15:15 PM
Quote from: "thik"
Quote from: "Frijole"
Quote from: "yapperz1"
Katz here's the gist of the video since you can't watch it.

there's a "deep throat" coming forward right now with information as to
basically who did it. we're hoping that it pans out.
this is someone who is very credible. Holland has no idea about it.
he's still bringing up old names. the 3 suspects are still coming up in his
conversations along with other people


Wow Yaps - you woke me from my lurking stupor! lol  I'm going to go listen to this too.  

Interesting - once again there is a veil of privacy.... "Deep Throat".... which leads me to believe that there is more to this story than 3 stupid horny teenage boys.  Drugs, coverup, organized crime?  We wouldn't have a "Deep Throat", a Shango, a Simian, etc. etc. without a reason.

I sure hope this pans out.  I'm starting to get really p-ed off.  LOL



Speaking of that,,,, is it just me, or does Croes look like he's pee'd his pants in that classy picture ???

Now this got me out of lurk mode!
More like the pic has caught him pee-ing his pants.
Hey Thik and all Monkeys.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #522 9/10 - 9/12/2006
Post by: msmarple on September 12, 2006, 04:16:33 PM
Quote from: "Hotshot"
Quote from: "Lala'sMom"
Hello everyone.  Just a quick post here to tell those who wanted to know that CP405 is allright.  She's had her precious grandbaby with her for the past week.  I think maybe she has been a bit under the weather also.  Maybe she will check in with us later.  Nemo is fine too.  :wink:


BTW connection between SC and the others...Freddy?   Lorenzo?  Porn videos?  Keep thinking monkeys.

The only thing I can tell you is, Steve told me Lorenzo used to work at the Bahia as a DJ.  Thats the one thing they have in common.  Oh, and they all go there might be another thing in common


I may have the Cast of Characters mixed up, but doesn't Lorenzo have that "mobile party audio van" - crazy painted, we have a pix ("editorial we" - Klaas?  :wink:  )

Uh, DJ connections very likely ...


Title: Lively Case Discussion #522 9/10 - 9/12/2006
Post by: NM on September 12, 2006, 04:19:11 PM
Quote from: "Hotshot"
Quote from: "Lala'sMom"
Hello everyone.  Just a quick post here to tell those who wanted to know that CP405 is allright.  She's had her precious grandbaby with her for the past week.  I think maybe she has been a bit under the weather also.  Maybe she will check in with us later.  Nemo is fine too.  :wink:


BTW connection between SC and the others...Freddy?   Lorenzo?  Porn videos?  Keep thinking monkeys.

The only thing I can tell you is, Steve told me Lorenzo used to work at the Bahia as a DJ.  Thats the one thing they have in common.  Oh, and they all go there might be another thing in common

Hey Hotshot,
So there really is a lorenzo van rijn? or is lorenzo a nickname for a real name?


Title: Lively Case Discussion #522 9/10 - 9/12/2006
Post by: Atlmetroguy on September 12, 2006, 04:19:56 PM
Hiya Monkeys...

Just saw the front page and watched the Larry Garrison video and was curious as to how credible everybody thinks he is? I have no opinion but wondered what you all were thinking on this....


Title: Lively Case Discussion #522 9/10 - 9/12/2006
Post by: klaasend on September 12, 2006, 04:21:52 PM
Quote from: "msmarple"
Quote from: "Hotshot"
Quote from: "Lala'sMom"
Hello everyone.  Just a quick post here to tell those who wanted to know that CP405 is allright.  She's had her precious grandbaby with her for the past week.  I think maybe she has been a bit under the weather also.  Maybe she will check in with us later.  Nemo is fine too.  :wink:


BTW connection between SC and the others...Freddy?   Lorenzo?  Porn videos?  Keep thinking monkeys.

The only thing I can tell you is, Steve told me Lorenzo used to work at the Bahia as a DJ.  Thats the one thing they have in common.  Oh, and they all go there might be another thing in common


I may have the Cast of Characters mixed up, but doesn't Lorenzo have that "mobile party audio van" - crazy painted, we have a pix ("editorial we" - Klaas?  :wink:  )

Uh, DJ connections very likely ...

Yes - Lorenzo's van:

(http://i14.photobucket.com/albums/a306/klaasend/lorenzocarcopy.jpg)

(http://i14.photobucket.com/albums/a306/klaasend/piwannabee6fqcopy.jpg)


Title: Lively Case Discussion #522 9/10 - 9/12/2006
Post by: msmarple on September 12, 2006, 04:26:00 PM
Klaas -what took you so long?  :lol:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #522 9/10 - 9/12/2006
Post by: Hotshot on September 12, 2006, 04:26:03 PM
Quote from: "NM"
Quote from: "Hotshot"
Quote from: "Lala'sMom"
Hello everyone.  Just a quick post here to tell those who wanted to know that CP405 is allright.  She's had her precious grandbaby with her for the past week.  I think maybe she has been a bit under the weather also.  Maybe she will check in with us later.  Nemo is fine too.  :wink:


BTW connection between SC and the others...Freddy?   Lorenzo?  Porn videos?  Keep thinking monkeys.

The only thing I can tell you is, Steve told me Lorenzo used to work at the Bahia as a DJ.  Thats the one thing they have in common.  Oh, and they all go there might be another thing in common

Hey Hotshot,
So there really is a lorenzo van rijn? or is lorenzo a nickname for a real name?


yes there is..I have that confirmed


Title: Lively Case Discussion #522 9/10 - 9/12/2006
Post by: KatzHome on September 12, 2006, 04:27:02 PM
Quote from: "Hotshot"
Quote from: "Lala'sMom"
Hello everyone.  Just a quick post here to tell those who wanted to know that CP405 is allright.  She's had her precious grandbaby with her for the past week.  I think maybe she has been a bit under the weather also.  Maybe she will check in with us later.  Nemo is fine too.  :wink:


BTW connection between SC and the others...Freddy?   Lorenzo?  Porn videos?  Keep thinking monkeys.

The only thing I can tell you is, Steve told me Lorenzo used to work at the Bahia as a DJ.  Thats the one thing they have in common.  Oh, and they all go there might be another thing in common


What about drugs, Hotshot? That's what I think the connection is...


Title: Lively Case Discussion #522 9/10 - 9/12/2006
Post by: KatzHome on September 12, 2006, 04:29:58 PM
Quote from: "Frijole"
Quote from: "KatzHome"
Last night, when I was leaving work, one of the Security Guards and I were talking about why no one has come forward, Beaner...

Both of us tend to think it's because of fear of reprisal..


reprisal... or death!? i think there are some nasty folks involved.  Not sure if they had anything to do with Natalee or if they were just a part of the cover up that ensued...  Man the mini series on this will be like 4 months long.


I was thinking death as a possible reprisal...  either for the one who talked or for their family, Beaner...

Quote from: "Frijole"
I can't watch the video because it wants me to download IE7.  I don't even use IE... grrrrr  Will deal with it later - gotta be in the mood ya know? ha.

Thik- re the photo of Croes - you talking about the one this a.m.where he looks like he is on crack cocaine or Meth?   :lol:


Same here ~ only there is no IE7 for Macs ~ they stopped making IE for Mac since Apple developed Safari...  if they were decent, they'd allow the Safari browser to watch their stupid IE videos...  ::shrug::   I still think I have the better part of the deal, videos or no...


Title: Lively Case Discussion #522 9/10 - 9/12/2006
Post by: KatzHome on September 12, 2006, 04:31:05 PM
Quote from: "NM"
Quote from: "thik"
Quote from: "Frijole"
Quote from: "yapperz1"
Katz here's the gist of the video since you can't watch it.

there's a "deep throat" coming forward right now with information as to
basically who did it. we're hoping that it pans out.
this is someone who is very credible. Holland has no idea about it.
he's still bringing up old names. the 3 suspects are still coming up in his
conversations along with other people


Wow Yaps - you woke me from my lurking stupor! lol  I'm going to go listen to this too.  

Interesting - once again there is a veil of privacy.... "Deep Throat".... which leads me to believe that there is more to this story than 3 stupid horny teenage boys.  Drugs, coverup, organized crime?  We wouldn't have a "Deep Throat", a Shango, a Simian, etc. etc. without a reason.

I sure hope this pans out.  I'm starting to get really p-ed off.  LOL



Speaking of that,,,, is it just me, or does Croes look like he's pee'd his pants in that classy picture ???

Now this got me out of lurk mode!
More like the pic has caught him pee-ing his pants.
Hey Thik and all Monkeys.


I didn't notice that, but hi Thik and NM


Title: Lively Case Discussion #522 9/10 - 9/12/2006
Post by: KatzHome on September 12, 2006, 04:32:19 PM
Quote from: "Atlmetroguy"
Hiya Monkeys...

Just saw the front page and watched the Larry Garrison video and was curious as to how credible everybody thinks he is? I have no opinion but wondered what you all were thinking on this....


That came up the first time he was interviewed, Metro ~ the bottom line seemed to be "pretty credible."


Title: Lively Case Discussion #522 9/10 - 9/12/2006
Post by: Atlmetroguy on September 12, 2006, 04:33:43 PM
Quote from: "KatzHome"
Quote from: "Atlmetroguy"
Hiya Monkeys...

Just saw the front page and watched the Larry Garrison video and was curious as to how credible everybody thinks he is? I have no opinion but wondered what you all were thinking on this....


That came up the first time he was interviewed, Metro ~ the bottom line seemed to be "pretty credible."

********************
Hi Katz...thanks...I was just curious as to what everybody was thinking...


Title: Lively Case Discussion #522 9/10 - 9/12/2006
Post by: NM on September 12, 2006, 04:34:06 PM
Quote from: "Hotshot"
Quote from: "NM"
Quote from: "Hotshot"
Quote from: "Lala'sMom"
Hello everyone.  Just a quick post here to tell those who wanted to know that CP405 is allright.  She's had her precious grandbaby with her for the past week.  I think maybe she has been a bit under the weather also.  Maybe she will check in with us later.  Nemo is fine too.  :wink:


BTW connection between SC and the others...Freddy?   Lorenzo?  Porn videos?  Keep thinking monkeys.

The only thing I can tell you is, Steve told me Lorenzo used to work at the Bahia as a DJ.  Thats the one thing they have in common.  Oh, and they all go there might be another thing in common

Hey Hotshot,
So there really is a lorenzo van rijn? or is lorenzo a nickname for a real name?


yes there is..I have that confirmed


Hotshot, thank you


Title: Lively Case Discussion #522 9/10 - 9/12/2006
Post by: Dihannah1 on September 12, 2006, 04:35:06 PM
Good afternoon monkeys.  Trying to catch up. Very interesting deveopment!

Katz - Try downloading Firefox browser http://www.foxfire.com/ It's a popular non IE and Netscape alternative, who some prefer.  It's free and should work on any platform.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #522 9/10 - 9/12/2006
Post by: klaasend on September 12, 2006, 04:35:10 PM
Here's another recent photo of Steve Croes from September 6, 2006 at the Bahia:

(http://i14.photobucket.com/albums/a306/klaasend/SteveCBahia090606.jpg)


Title: Lively Case Discussion #522 9/10 - 9/12/2006
Post by: Hotshot on September 12, 2006, 04:36:57 PM
Quote from: "KatzHome"
Quote from: "Hotshot"
Quote from: "Lala'sMom"
Hello everyone.  Just a quick post here to tell those who wanted to know that CP405 is allright.  She's had her precious grandbaby with her for the past week.  I think maybe she has been a bit under the weather also.  Maybe she will check in with us later.  Nemo is fine too.  :wink:


BTW connection between SC and the others...Freddy?   Lorenzo?  Porn videos?  Keep thinking monkeys.

The only thing I can tell you is, Steve told me Lorenzo used to work at the Bahia as a DJ.  Thats the one thing they have in common.  Oh, and they all go there might be another thing in common


What about drugs, Hotshot? That's what I think the connection is...


Well, I wouldn't doubt it, but I can't confirm that.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #522 9/10 - 9/12/2006
Post by: Dihannah1 on September 12, 2006, 04:39:03 PM
Wonder if Jossy knows anything about it?  One other suspect went to him in the past.  Maybe Jossy knows and got smart and sent this person to Garrison to check out or get FBI involved?  Whatever, good thing they are leaving ALE out!


Title: Lively Case Discussion #522 9/10 - 9/12/2006
Post by: thik on September 12, 2006, 04:41:46 PM
Hey Katz and NM :

It's just endless,, Hollandaise coming to re-re investigate,, whatever's left
of the original investigations...  Garrison with an alledged ''Deep Throat"..
I know ya gotta have 'faith in the system',, but don't ya need an actual 'system' first ?? jeez....  just a bit skeptical,, that's all...

Why would whoever has this info, contact Mr Garrison?
Wouldn't there be safer means to divulging this info?


Title: Lively Case Discussion #522 9/10 - 9/12/2006
Post by: Atlmetroguy on September 12, 2006, 04:42:49 PM
Quote from: "thik"
Hey Katz and NM :

It's just endless,, Hollandaise coming to re-re investigate,, whatever's left
of the original investigations...  Garrison with an alledged ''Deep Throat"..
I know ya gotta have 'faith in the system',, but don't ya need an actual 'system' first ?? jeez....  just a bit skeptical,, that's all...

Why would whoever has this info, contact Mr Garrison?
Wouldn't there be safer means to divulging this info?

*************************
Well...given the culpability track record of the ALE I suppose Larry's as good as anybody...imo


Title: Lively Case Discussion #522 9/10 - 9/12/2006
Post by: Dihannah1 on September 12, 2006, 04:46:22 PM
Ok, everytime I post, it get's quiet and everybody disappears....  :oops:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #522 9/10 - 9/12/2006
Post by: thik on September 12, 2006, 04:46:23 PM
Quote from: "Atlmetroguy"
Quote from: "thik"
Hey Katz and NM :

It's just endless,, Hollandaise coming to re-re investigate,, whatever's left
of the original investigations...  Garrison with an alledged ''Deep Throat"..
I know ya gotta have 'faith in the system',, but don't ya need an actual 'system' first ?? jeez....  just a bit skeptical,, that's all...

Why would whoever has this info, contact Mr Garrison?
Wouldn't there be safer means to divulging this info?

*************************
Well...given the culpability track record of the ALE I suppose Larry's as good as anybody...imo


Good point !!  

 also,,, good word  'culpability'   8)


Title: Lively Case Discussion #522 9/10 - 9/12/2006
Post by: KatzHome on September 12, 2006, 04:47:30 PM
Quote from: "Dihannah1"
Good afternoon monkeys.  Trying to catch up. Very interesting deveopment!

Katz - Try downloading Firefox browser http://www.foxfire.com/ It's a popular non IE and Netscape alternative, who some prefer.  It's free and should work on any platform.
Thanks for that tip, Dihannah ~ yeah ~ I heard about that browser...  forgot about it though...  should throw out the IE browser I have, and don't use...

I'll see if the video plays on it...  and if it doesn't ~ I'll throw that out too ~ because I really LOVE the way Safari works...  it's lightening fast, and displays pages beautifully...  nice fonts ~ just wish it had a built-in editor...  I haven't bought a web page builder yet...  just use html and the free Netscape page builder for my own web pages...  :oops:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #522 9/10 - 9/12/2006
Post by: thik on September 12, 2006, 04:48:04 PM
Quote from: "thik"
Quote from: "Atlmetroguy"
Quote from: "thik"
Hey Katz and NM :

It's just endless,, Hollandaise coming to re-re investigate,, whatever's left
of the original investigations...  Garrison with an alledged ''Deep Throat"..
I know ya gotta have 'faith in the system',, but don't ya need an actual 'system' first ?? jeez....  just a bit skeptical,, that's all...

Why would whoever has this info, contact Mr Garrison?
Wouldn't there be safer means to divulging this info?

*************************
Well...given the culpability track record of the ALE I suppose Larry's as good as anybody...imo


Good point !!  

 also,,, good word  'culpability'   8)



Maybe 'Deep Throat" is .....................TITO !   :lol:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #522 9/10 - 9/12/2006
Post by: KatzHome on September 12, 2006, 04:48:47 PM
Quote from: "Hotshot"
Quote from: "KatzHome"
Quote from: "Hotshot"
Quote from: "Lala'sMom"
Hello everyone.  Just a quick post here to tell those who wanted to know that CP405 is allright.  She's had her precious grandbaby with her for the past week.  I think maybe she has been a bit under the weather also.  Maybe she will check in with us later.  Nemo is fine too.  :wink:


BTW connection between SC and the others...Freddy?   Lorenzo?  Porn videos?  Keep thinking monkeys.

The only thing I can tell you is, Steve told me Lorenzo used to work at the Bahia as a DJ.  Thats the one thing they have in common.  Oh, and they all go there might be another thing in common


What about drugs, Hotshot? That's what I think the connection is...


Well, I wouldn't doubt it, but I can't confirm that.


Yeah ~ I'm hearing ya, Hotshot..   :wink:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #522 9/10 - 9/12/2006
Post by: klaasend on September 12, 2006, 04:48:50 PM
Quote from: "Atlmetroguy"
Quote from: "thik"
Hey Katz and NM :

It's just endless,, Hollandaise coming to re-re investigate,, whatever's left
of the original investigations...  Garrison with an alledged ''Deep Throat"..
I know ya gotta have 'faith in the system',, but don't ya need an actual 'system' first ?? jeez....  just a bit skeptical,, that's all...

Why would whoever has this info, contact Mr Garrison?
Wouldn't there be safer means to divulging this info?

*************************
Well...given the culpability track record of the ALE I suppose Larry's as good as anybody...imo

Yep - ALE is the last place I'd go  :wink:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #522 9/10 - 9/12/2006
Post by: Dihannah1 on September 12, 2006, 04:52:04 PM
Quote from: "KatzHome"
Quote from: "Dihannah1"
Good afternoon monkeys.  Trying to catch up. Very interesting deveopment!

Katz - Try downloading Firefox browser http://www.foxfire.com/ It's a popular non IE and Netscape alternative, who some prefer.  It's free and should work on any platform.
Thanks for that tip, Dihannah ~ yeah ~ I heard about that browser...  forgot about it though...  should throw out the IE browser I have, and don't use...

I'll see if the video plays on it...  and if it doesn't ~ I'll throw that out too ~ because I really LOVE the way Safari works...  it's lightening fast, and displays pages beautifully...  nice fonts ~ just wish it had a built-in editor...  I haven't bought a web page builder yet...  just use html and the free Netscape page builder for my own web pages...  :oops:


Hmmm,  I've never heard of Safari,  may have to check that out myself.
Thanks for YOUR tip... :)


Title: Lively Case Discussion #522 9/10 - 9/12/2006
Post by: KatzHome on September 12, 2006, 04:53:06 PM
Quote from: "Dihannah1"
Ok, everytime I post, it get's quiet and everybody disappears....  :oops:


{{{hugs}}}  Noooo!  that's not it ~ I'm just heavily involved in a graphics project and going back and forth between the artwork and here....


Title: Lively Case Discussion #522 9/10 - 9/12/2006
Post by: KatzHome on September 12, 2006, 04:55:40 PM
Quote from: "klaasend"
Quote from: "Atlmetroguy"
Quote from: "thik"
Hey Katz and NM :

It's just endless,, Hollandaise coming to re-re investigate,, whatever's left
of the original investigations...  Garrison with an alledged ''Deep Throat"..
I know ya gotta have 'faith in the system',, but don't ya need an actual 'system' first ?? jeez....  just a bit skeptical,, that's all...

Why would whoever has this info, contact Mr Garrison?
Wouldn't there be safer means to divulging this info?

*************************
Well...given the culpability track record of the ALE I suppose Larry's as good as anybody...imo

Yep - ALE is the last place I'd go  :wink:


 :lol: Not exactly last, Klaas ~ I'd go to them before the witch...  you know...  Julia's credibility is sub-zero in my eyes...


Title: Lively Case Discussion #522 9/10 - 9/12/2006
Post by: klaasend on September 12, 2006, 04:56:10 PM
Quote from: "thik"
Quote from: "thik"
Quote from: "Atlmetroguy"
Quote from: "thik"
Hey Katz and NM :

It's just endless,, Hollandaise coming to re-re investigate,, whatever's left
of the original investigations...  Garrison with an alledged ''Deep Throat"..
I know ya gotta have 'faith in the system',, but don't ya need an actual 'system' first ?? jeez....  just a bit skeptical,, that's all...

Why would whoever has this info, contact Mr Garrison?
Wouldn't there be safer means to divulging this info?

*************************
Well...given the culpability track record of the ALE I suppose Larry's as good as anybody...imo


Good point !!  

 also,,, good word  'culpability'   8)



Maybe 'Deep Throat" is .....................TITO !   :lol:

 :lol:  :lol:  :lol:  :lol:

(http://i14.photobucket.com/albums/a306/klaasend/ticklemetito2.jpg)


Title: Lively Case Discussion #522 9/10 - 9/12/2006
Post by: klaasend on September 12, 2006, 04:57:10 PM
(http://i14.photobucket.com/albums/a306/klaasend/threadlock.jpg)


Title: Lively Case Discussion #522 9/10 - 9/12/2006
Post by: Dihannah1 on September 12, 2006, 04:59:35 PM
Does anybody think Jossy is one of the 'others' who DT is talking too?


Title: Lively Case Discussion #522 9/10 - 9/12/2006
Post by: KatzHome on September 12, 2006, 05:00:26 PM
Okies ~ project finished!  :D   This one at least...  Grocery store and then off to bed for a nap before work...  tomorrow I have photos to shoot...  so I won't be here much...  I don't think, anyway...

Have a great day and a great evening everyone!


Title: Lively Case Discussion #522 9/10 - 9/12/2006
Post by: KatzHome on September 12, 2006, 05:01:37 PM
Quote from: "Dihannah1"
Does anybody think Jossy is one of the 'others' who DT is talking too?


I think Jossy's in Florida... not sure though...  but I think so...

I'll bet he's helping though...  even from Florida...


Title: Lively Case Discussion #522 9/10 - 9/12/2006
Post by: Dihannah1 on September 12, 2006, 05:01:58 PM
Have a great day Katz!


Title: Lively Case Discussion #522 9/10 - 9/12/2006
Post by: KatzHome on September 12, 2006, 05:11:59 PM
Thanks, Dihannah ~ you too!  Now I'm out of here for real...  I just came back to shut down the computer...  I gave it a real work-out this morning...

Bye ya'll!


Title: Lively Case Discussion #522 9/10 - 9/12/2006
Post by: San on September 12, 2006, 05:17:23 PM
Quote from: "thik"
Hey Katz and NM :

It's just endless,, Hollandaise coming to re-re investigate,, whatever's left
of the original investigations...  Garrison with an alledged ''Deep Throat"..
I know ya gotta have 'faith in the system',, but don't ya need an actual 'system' first ?? jeez....  just a bit skeptical,, that's all...

Why would whoever has this info, contact Mr Garrison?
Wouldn't there be safer means to divulging this info?

We don't know who Garrison was in contact with when he was in Aruba.  So maybe this person enjoyed how Garrison setup Paulus and Joran without any fear of doing so.

The safest means to divulge this information would be the United States.  We all know what happens when you give information to the ALE.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #522 9/10 - 9/12/2006
Post by: terryd270 on September 12, 2006, 05:26:28 PM
Hi everyone!  I hope Larry does has a good source, since knowledge is power and now the ALE and Dutch have to worry about this source..  I guess its kinda like a check and balance system since they have no justice system..


Title: Lively Case Discussion #522 9/10 - 9/12/2006
Post by: nonesuche on September 12, 2006, 05:28:39 PM
San-

We all know if you give it to the ALE, it passes to the likes of van der Stratten direct to Paulus and Renfro, and likely their muse Anita.  :wink:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #522 9/10 - 9/12/2006
Post by: Shizaru on September 12, 2006, 05:31:22 PM
Quote from: "igsigs"
Assuming that Joran did mention the FH story on 5/31...

If you are Deepak and Satish what the heck are you thinking when ALE asks you if Joran and Natalee were at the FHs? You would think the HI cover story was blown. But they stick with it, both of them. Why?

Because the FH story is a total fabrication, and reacted to as an ALE fishing expedition by K2?

How important were those phone calls made by Joran to Deepak immediately PRIOR to and DURING the making of his statement on 5/31?


Could be that if Joran mentioned the FH on 5/31 it was as part of the HI dropoff story rather than a completely different story.  That is, he may have said that on the way back from the lighthouse they stopped for a while at the FH, where he and Natalee walked around, then they dropped her off at the HI. That is a good question about 2K's reaction tho.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #522 9/10 - 9/12/2006
Post by: San on September 12, 2006, 05:33:59 PM
I just watched the Larry Garrison interview.  He said new information will be coming forward within the next two weeks.  Is it a strange coincidence that it's the same time the Dutch Specialists are coming in.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #522 9/10 - 9/12/2006
Post by: thik on September 12, 2006, 05:35:21 PM
Quote from: "San"
Quote from: "thik"
Hey Katz and NM :

It's just endless,, Hollandaise coming to re-re investigate,, whatever's left
of the original investigations...  Garrison with an alledged ''Deep Throat"..
I know ya gotta have 'faith in the system',, but don't ya need an actual 'system' first ?? jeez....  just a bit skeptical,, that's all...

Why would whoever has this info, contact Mr Garrison?
Wouldn't there be safer means to divulging this info?

We don't know who Garrison was in contact with when he was in Aruba.  So maybe this person enjoyed how Garrison setup Paulus and Joran without any fear of doing so.

The safest means to divulge this information would be the United States.  We all know what happens when you give information to the ALE.


San :

Does this become a 'jurisdictional thing' again...?
Or has the ''Hollandaise System'' changed ?
It does make sense that with the word of Holland
coming in with guns, anyone fearful of being implicated
would want to make sure they're covered...  who knows...


Title: Lively Case Discussion #522 9/10 - 9/12/2006
Post by: klaasend on September 12, 2006, 05:35:42 PM
Quote from: "San"
I just watched the Larry Garrison interview.  He said new information will be coming forward within the next two weeks.  Is it a strange coincidence that it's the same time the Dutch Specialists are coming in.

Maybe he needs to wait for them to take over so he can give them the information?


Title: Lively Case Discussion #522 9/10 - 9/12/2006
Post by: San on September 12, 2006, 05:38:23 PM
Quote from: "nonesuche"
San-

We all know if you give it to the ALE, it passes to the likes of van der Stratten direct to Paulus and Renfro, and likely their muse Anita.  :wink:

Did you mean moose Anita :lol:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #522 9/10 - 9/12/2006
Post by: nonesuche on September 12, 2006, 05:40:12 PM
Good point Klaas, it would certainly be the prudent thing to do and Garrison isn't naive about the ALE.

I am less inclined to think anything but perhaps no good post the encounter with Natalee ever took place at the FH's. igsigs does raise some good strategic thought around those statements and motivations for sticking to that, it would be nice to have those answers.

I can never forget Greta's call-out to the 'world" for one witness to come forward who saw Joran on that beach around the FH's with Natalee.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #522 9/10 - 9/12/2006
Post by: nonesuche on September 12, 2006, 05:40:30 PM
Quote from: "San"
Quote from: "nonesuche"
San-

We all know if you give it to the ALE, it passes to the likes of van der Stratten direct to Paulus and Renfro, and likely their muse Anita.  :wink:

Did you mean moose Anita :lol:


ROFL  :lol:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #522 9/10 - 9/12/2006
Post by: yapperz1 on September 12, 2006, 05:43:41 PM
Klaas you may be 1000% correct. Why give info to ALE it will just go in the disappearing drawer with the rest of the evidence


Title: Lively Case Discussion #522 9/10 - 9/12/2006
Post by: NM on September 12, 2006, 05:46:13 PM
Quote from: "thik"
Quote from: "thik"
Quote from: "Atlmetroguy"
Quote from: "thik"
Hey Katz and NM :

It's just endless,, Hollandaise coming to re-re investigate,, whatever's left
of the original investigations...  Garrison with an alledged ''Deep Throat"..
I know ya gotta have 'faith in the system',, but don't ya need an actual 'system' first ?? jeez....  just a bit skeptical,, that's all...

Why would whoever has this info, contact Mr Garrison?
Wouldn't there be safer means to divulging this info?

*************************
Well...given the culpability track record of the ALE I suppose Larry's as good as anybody...imo


Good point !!  

 also,,, good word  'culpability'   8)



Maybe 'Deep Throat" is .....................TITO !   :lol:

I could believe tito as deep throat, just not for info :lol:  :oops:

I still wresting in my mind the dutch being any help to us, maybe they are going to seal-up any leaks for future coverups. They seem all about that. All icing and no cake=dutch.  But maybe just maybe there is a chance they will slip-up or get pissed at someone and reveal the truth and procesute the guilty.

Also, unless I missed something I think Mr. Garrison was telling that he knew someone was talking, I didn't take it that they were talking to him, but I could be wrong.

Hi Katz


Title: Lively Case Discussion #522 9/10 - 9/12/2006
Post by: San on September 12, 2006, 05:46:55 PM
Quote from: "klaasend"
Quote from: "San"
I just watched the Larry Garrison interview.  He said new information will be coming forward within the next two weeks.  Is it a strange coincidence that it's the same time the Dutch Specialists are coming in.

Maybe he needs to wait for them to take over so he can give them the information?

Right and I bet the FBI has documentation/video of what ever information he/she is providing to make sure nothing happens to it when they turn the information over.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #522 9/10 - 9/12/2006
Post by: San on September 12, 2006, 05:49:23 PM
Quote from: "thik"
Quote from: "San"
Quote from: "thik"
Hey Katz and NM :

It's just endless,, Hollandaise coming to re-re investigate,, whatever's left
of the original investigations...  Garrison with an alledged ''Deep Throat"..
I know ya gotta have 'faith in the system',, but don't ya need an actual 'system' first ?? jeez....  just a bit skeptical,, that's all...

Why would whoever has this info, contact Mr Garrison?
Wouldn't there be safer means to divulging this info?

We don't know who Garrison was in contact with when he was in Aruba.  So maybe this person enjoyed how Garrison setup Paulus and Joran without any fear of doing so.

The safest means to divulge this information would be the United States.  We all know what happens when you give information to the ALE.


San :

Does this become a 'jurisdictional thing' again...?
Or has the ''Hollandaise System'' changed ?
It does make sense that with the word of Holland
coming in with guns, anyone fearful of being implicated
would want to make sure they're covered...  who knows...


Did we ever really know the Holland system.  We were all misinformed by people like Arlene Ellis Schipper.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #522 9/10 - 9/12/2006
Post by: NM on September 12, 2006, 05:53:27 PM
Quote from: "San"
Quote from: "thik"
Quote from: "San"
Quote from: "thik"
Hey Katz and NM :

It's just endless,, Hollandaise coming to re-re investigate,, whatever's left
of the original investigations...  Garrison with an alledged ''Deep Throat"..
I know ya gotta have 'faith in the system',, but don't ya need an actual 'system' first ?? jeez....  just a bit skeptical,, that's all...

Why would whoever has this info, contact Mr Garrison?
Wouldn't there be safer means to divulging this info?

We don't know who Garrison was in contact with when he was in Aruba.  So maybe this person enjoyed how Garrison setup Paulus and Joran without any fear of doing so.

The safest means to divulge this information would be the United States.  We all know what happens when you give information to the ALE.


San :

Does this become a 'jurisdictional thing' again...?
Or has the ''Hollandaise System'' changed ?
It does make sense that with the word of Holland
coming in with guns, anyone fearful of being implicated
would want to make sure they're covered...  who knows...


Did we ever really know the Holland system.  We were all misinformed by people like Arlene Ellis Schipper.


I think the no system, is the system they refer to as their system, which is why we don't understand their system :lol:
Are they a bad cartoon or something?


Title: Lively Case Discussion #522 9/10 - 9/12/2006
Post by: nonesuche on September 12, 2006, 05:58:11 PM
NM-

I do understand your hesitation in trusting the Dutch, but I also think Garrison is crafty enough to document this, copy to the FBI - to our state dept - etc........which pushes back open accountability and visibility upon the Dutch.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #522 9/10 - 9/12/2006
Post by: nonesuche on September 12, 2006, 06:00:20 PM
Klaas-

Can I post my fave photo of Arlene now?  :lol:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #522 9/10 - 9/12/2006
Post by: yapperz1 on September 12, 2006, 06:00:28 PM
Wonder if anyone on Aruba or in Holland are watching their backs???
Paranoia anyone??????   :lol:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #522 9/10 - 9/12/2006
Post by: thik on September 12, 2006, 06:02:36 PM
Quote from: "yapperz1"
Wonder if anyone on Aruba or in Holland are watching their backs???
Paranoia anyone??????   :lol:



''Paranoia Will Destroya""


Title: Lively Case Discussion #522 9/10 - 9/12/2006
Post by: NM on September 12, 2006, 06:02:51 PM
Quote from: "nonesuche"
NM-

I do understand your hesitation in trusting the Dutch, but I also think Garrison is crafty enough to document this, copy to the FBI - to our state dept - etc........which pushes back open accountability and visibility upon the Dutch.

Hey Nonesy-butterfly,
that may be they only way to "trust" the dutch, back them in a corner, twist their little arm till they scream UNCLE.

xoxoxox to you.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #522 9/10 - 9/12/2006
Post by: nonesuche on September 12, 2006, 06:04:16 PM
Thanks NM for the XOXOX, I needed those today.

I do think strong-arming them is the only way to get results, but I also think having that kind of visibility in the documentation will make it very difficult for anymore evidence to 'disappear'.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #522 9/10 - 9/12/2006
Post by: NM on September 12, 2006, 06:04:25 PM
Quote from: "thik"
Quote from: "yapperz1"
Wonder if anyone on Aruba or in Holland are watching their backs???
Paranoia anyone??????   :lol:



''Paranoia Will Destroya""

 :lol:  :lol:  :lol:
and true!!

bbl


Title: Lively Case Discussion #522 9/10 - 9/12/2006
Post by: klaasend on September 12, 2006, 06:10:28 PM
Quote from: "nonesuche"
NM-

I do understand your hesitation in trusting the Dutch, but I also think Garrison is crafty enough to document this, copy to the FBI - to our state dept - etc........which pushes back open accountability and visibility upon the Dutch.

Precisely. Honestly,knowing what we know now would any of us trust information with anyone in Aruba?


Title: Lively Case Discussion #522 9/10 - 9/12/2006
Post by: thik on September 12, 2006, 06:12:19 PM
Quote from: "nonesuche"
Thanks NM for the XOXOX, I needed those today.

I do think strong-arming them is the only way to get results, but I also think having that kind of visibility in the documentation will make it very difficult for anymore evidence to 'disappear'.


  nonesuche:
I walk every afternoon near a golfcourse at work.
Everytime I see a butterfl, I think of you........
Hope you're doing well... [/b]


Title: Lively Case Discussion #522 9/10 - 9/12/2006
Post by: Peaches on September 12, 2006, 06:12:44 PM
Quote from: "klaasend"
Quote from: "nonesuche"
NM-

I do understand your hesitation in trusting the Dutch, but I also think Garrison is crafty enough to document this, copy to the FBI - to our state dept - etc........which pushes back open accountability and visibility upon the Dutch.

Precisely. Honestly,knowing what we know now would any of us trust information with anyone in Aruba?


I don't think so, scooter.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #522 9/10 - 9/12/2006
Post by: klaasend on September 12, 2006, 06:13:49 PM
NEW FRONT PAGE POST:

Natalee Holloway Investigation: Abraham Jones June 5, 2005 Statement


http://www.scaredmonkeys.com/2006/09/12/natalee-holloway-investigation-abraham-jones-june-5-2005-statement/

Also posted in Important Case Document thread.


 :wink:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #522 9/10 - 9/12/2006
Post by: thik on September 12, 2006, 06:13:51 PM
Quote from: thik
Quote from: "nonesuche"
Thanks NM for the XOXOX, I needed those today.

I do think strong-arming them is the only way to get results, but I also think having that kind of visibility in the documentation will make it very difficult for anymore evidence to 'disappear'.


  nonesuche:
I walk every afternoon near a golfcourse at work.
Everytime I see a butterfly, I think of you........
Hope you're doing well...

(sp)


Title: Lively Case Discussion #522 9/10 - 9/12/2006
Post by: nonesuche on September 12, 2006, 06:19:03 PM
Quote from: "thik"
Quote from: "nonesuche"
Thanks NM for the XOXOX, I needed those today.

I do think strong-arming them is the only way to get results, but I also think having that kind of visibility in the documentation will make it very difficult for anymore evidence to 'disappear'.


  nonesuche:
I walk every afternoon near a golfcourse at work.
Everytime I see a butterfl, I think of you........
Hope you're doing well... [/b]


thik-

What a kind and caring thing to say, thank you so much. I hope you are doing well.

I love your new term "hollandaise"  :lol:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #522 9/10 - 9/12/2006
Post by: nonesuche on September 12, 2006, 06:23:31 PM
Hey Peaches-

Hope you are feeling well today  :D How's my back buddy?

I just posted a photo of Klaas in the lounge, it's a goody!


Title: Lively Case Discussion #522 9/10 - 9/12/2006
Post by: yapperz1 on September 12, 2006, 06:29:27 PM
from BFN:

Source:  New lead in Holloway case the last thing you'd ever expect
by:  ooSCARBOROUGHoo, www.ooSCARBOROUGHoo.eponym.com

I was just recently informed by a confidential Dutch source of mine that Garrison's new witness has lead investigators to a new lead in the Natalee Holloway case.  This source told me that the new lead involves 3 mystery suspects who are completely new to the suspect list.  This source also told me that Dutch and Aruban law enforcement were so suprised and shocked with this lead, the source said "its the last thing you'd ever expect."

Unfortunately, my source could not elaborate further on the details of these 3 new mystery suspects.  My source did say that they are trying to keep this under wraps from the media.  They are afaird of these 3 mystery suspects being a flight risk because they are no longer living in Dutch territory.  My source also told me that law enforcment is on the heels of these 3 mystery suspects, but called the lead "promising."

I asked my source if this is just going to be another catch-and-release tactic to show the world they are still working on the Natalee Holloway case.  My source said that because of the details Garrison's witness was able to provide, my source highly doubts it.  My source went on to say that Dutch investigators are a little ticked at Garrison for dropping the bomb on ABC News' "Good Morning America" program.  My source said "...Garrison rang the bell to millions of Americans that we were following a promising tip... Garrison gave details in the interview that the new witness "knows who is involved."

My source worries that because of Garrison alluding to the fact that their might be multiple suspects, this may tip the mystery suspects off that Dutch investigators are on their toes.

Now, when I first heard this information from my source, I was shocked, because I already have my theory about what happened that night.  But I remembered to keep an open mind, because Aruban's definition of "suspect" is different from ours.  These 3 mystery "people" could lead investigators to the perp, they may be witnesses, they may have information that investigators want, or they may be the perps themselves.  We have to keep an open mind, but I could tell that my source is excited about this tip so maybe we are a step closer to solving the case of Natalee Holloway


Title: Lively Case Discussion #522 9/10 - 9/12/2006
Post by: thik on September 12, 2006, 06:34:42 PM
Quote from: "yapperz1"
from BFN:

Source:  New lead in Holloway case the last thing you'd ever expect
by:  ooSCARBOROUGHoo, www.ooSCARBOROUGHoo.eponym.com

I was just recently informed by a confidential Dutch source of mine that Garrison's new witness has lead investigators to a new lead in the Natalee Holloway case.  This source told me that the new lead involves 3 mystery suspects who are completely new to the suspect list.  This source also told me that Dutch and Aruban law enforcement were so suprised and shocked with this lead, the source said "its the last thing you'd ever expect."

Unfortunately, my source could not elaborate further on the details of these 3 new mystery suspects.  My source did say that they are trying to keep this under wraps from the media.  They are afaird of these 3 mystery suspects being a flight risk because they are no longer living in Dutch territory.  My source also told me that law enforcment is on the heels of these 3 mystery suspects, but called the lead "promising."

I asked my source if this is just going to be another catch-and-release tactic to show the world they are still working on the Natalee Holloway case.  My source said that because of the details Garrison's witness was able to provide, my source highly doubts it.  My source went on to say that Dutch investigators are a little ticked at Garrison for dropping the bomb on ABC News' "Good Morning America" program.  My source said "...Garrison rang the bell to millions of Americans that we were following a promising tip... Garrison gave details in the interview that the new witness "knows who is involved."

My source worries that because of Garrison alluding to the fact that their might be multiple suspects, this may tip the mystery suspects off that Dutch investigators are on their toes.

Now, when I first heard this information from my source, I was shocked, because I already have my theory about what happened that night.  But I remembered to keep an open mind, because Aruban's definition of "suspect" is different from ours.  These 3 mystery "people" could lead investigators to the perp, they may be witnesses, they may have information that investigators want, or they may be the perps themselves.  We have to keep an open mind, but I could tell that my source is excited about this tip so maybe we are a step closer to solving the case of Natalee Holloway


''authorities area on the heels of these three mystery suspects''

who writes this stuff.......   (skeptisism abounds)


Title: Lively Case Discussion #522 9/10 - 9/12/2006
Post by: yapperz1 on September 12, 2006, 06:36:17 PM
beats me thik...it just tied in with the "deep throat" Garrison mentioned.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #522 9/10 - 9/12/2006
Post by: igsigs on September 12, 2006, 06:37:39 PM
Quote from: "klaasend"
NEW FRONT PAGE POST:

Natalee Holloway Investigation: Abraham Jones June 5, 2005 Statement

Thanks Klaas & RED...

So...what's here?

-Jones and John worked dayshift at Allegro.
-Contract expired on 6/1.
-Worked in 3's, actually 2's...with 1 guard ditching work on rotating basis.
-John smoked, did not deal.
-John hit on tourists.

Need John's statement for comparison.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #522 9/10 - 9/12/2006
Post by: thik on September 12, 2006, 06:39:58 PM
Quote from: "yapperz1"
beats me thik...it just tied in with the "deep throat" Garrison mentioned.


not questioning you yapperz1,,
it all just seems so ''timely''


Title: Lively Case Discussion #522 9/10 - 9/12/2006
Post by: yapperz1 on September 12, 2006, 06:43:12 PM
I agree totally. Here is another follow up posted by the same person:

Source:  New details about Garrison's witness and 3 mystery suspects
by:  ooSCARBOROUGHoo, ooSCARBOROUGHoo.eponym.com

In my last article, I wrote that a Dutch source has informed me investigators are on the toes of 3 new mystery suspects in the Natalee Holloway case.  My source said that investigators were tipped off about these 3 by Larry Garrison's new witness.

During a phone call this morning with my source, I was able to find out that Dutch investigators are furious at Garrison for dropping the bomb.  My source said "Garrison dropped a 600 pound bomb with a nuclear warhead on America... I am worried that Garrison may have tipped off these 3 new suspects, and because they are a risk of flight, investigators are worried they may flee.  My source told me that LE thought from the start these 3 were flight risk but because of Garrison dropping the bomb, they are now even more of a flight risk.  Then my source told me that Dutch LE is so worried about this, they sent a team to where these 3 mystery suspects are to stay on their toes.

We do not have to worry about these 3 going to yet another country.  What is really interesting its that according to my source, these 3 mystery suspects left Aruba right after Natalee Holloway went missing.  These 3 are brand new to the suspect list, they have yet to be interviewed, and the reason LE learned of them was because of the information that Garrison's new witness was able to provide.

Unfortuantely, my source would not elaborate as to what country these 3 suspects are in or what they mean to the case.  When I asked my source if these 3 new mystery suspects were the perps,  my source responded "... the lead is very promising.  Dutch LE will not move until they have all their ducks in a row.  Right now, they are in the process of interviewing more witnesses.  Once that is complete, there is a strong possibilty that these 3 could could be arrested."

Finally I asked my source what was the buzz on Garrison around Dutch LE circles.  My source said Dutch LE are furious at Garrison for revealing such crucial information at such a sensetive time.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #522 9/10 - 9/12/2006
Post by: thik on September 12, 2006, 06:47:41 PM
Quote from: "yapperz1"
I agree totally. Here is another follow up posted by the same person:

Source:  New details about Garrison's witness and 3 mystery suspects
by:  ooSCARBOROUGHoo, ooSCARBOROUGHoo.eponym.com

In my last article, I wrote that a Dutch source has informed me investigators are on the toes of 3 new mystery suspects in the Natalee Holloway case.  My source said that investigators were tipped off about these 3 by Larry Garrison's new witness.

During a phone call this morning with my source, I was able to find out that Dutch investigators are furious at Garrison for dropping the bomb.  My source said "Garrison dropped a 600 pound bomb with a nuclear warhead on America... I am worried that Garrison may have tipped off these 3 new suspects, and because they are a risk of flight, investigators are worried they may flee.  My source told me that LE thought from the start these 3 were flight risk but because of Garrison dropping the bomb, they are now even more of a flight risk.  Then my source told me that Dutch LE is so worried about this, they sent a team to where these 3 mystery suspects are to stay on their toes.

We do not have to worry about these 3 going to yet another country.  What is really interesting its that according to my source, these 3 mystery suspects left Aruba right after Natalee Holloway went missing.  These 3 are brand new to the suspect list, they have yet to be interviewed, and the reason LE learned of them was because of the information that Garrison's new witness was able to provide.

Unfortuantely, my source would not elaborate as to what country these 3 suspects are in or what they mean to the case.  When I asked my source if these 3 new mystery suspects were the perps,  my source responded "... the lead is very promising.  Dutch LE will not move until they have all their ducks in a row.  Right now, they are in the process of interviewing more witnesses.  Once that is complete, there is a strong possibilty that these 3 could could be arrested."

Finally I asked my source what was the buzz on Garrison around Dutch LE circles.  My source said Dutch LE are furious at Garrison for revealing such crucial information at such a sensetive time.


they have a 'foot' issue,,, first the investigators are right on their 'heels',.
the next thing you know they're on their toes......what the hell does that mean ?


Title: Lively Case Discussion #522 9/10 - 9/12/2006
Post by: thik on September 12, 2006, 06:48:32 PM
Quote from: "thik"
Quote from: "yapperz1"
I agree totally. Here is another follow up posted by the same person:

Source:  New details about Garrison's witness and 3 mystery suspects
by:  ooSCARBOROUGHoo, ooSCARBOROUGHoo.eponym.com

In my last article, I wrote that a Dutch source has informed me investigators are on the toes of 3 new mystery suspects in the Natalee Holloway case.  My source said that investigators were tipped off about these 3 by Larry Garrison's new witness.

During a phone call this morning with my source, I was able to find out that Dutch investigators are furious at Garrison for dropping the bomb.  My source said "Garrison dropped a 600 pound bomb with a nuclear warhead on America... I am worried that Garrison may have tipped off these 3 new suspects, and because they are a risk of flight, investigators are worried they may flee.  My source told me that LE thought from the start these 3 were flight risk but because of Garrison dropping the bomb, they are now even more of a flight risk.  Then my source told me that Dutch LE is so worried about this, they sent a team to where these 3 mystery suspects are to stay on their toes.

We do not have to worry about these 3 going to yet another country.  What is really interesting its that according to my source, these 3 mystery suspects left Aruba right after Natalee Holloway went missing.  These 3 are brand new to the suspect list, they have yet to be interviewed, and the reason LE learned of them was because of the information that Garrison's new witness was able to provide.

Unfortuantely, my source would not elaborate as to what country these 3 suspects are in or what they mean to the case.  When I asked my source if these 3 new mystery suspects were the perps,  my source responded "... the lead is very promising.  Dutch LE will not move until they have all their ducks in a row.  Right now, they are in the process of interviewing more witnesses.  Once that is complete, there is a strong possibilty that these 3 could could be arrested."

Finally I asked my source what was the buzz on Garrison around Dutch LE circles.  My source said Dutch LE are furious at Garrison for revealing such crucial information at such a sensetive time.


they have a 'foot' issue,,, first the investigators are right on their 'heels',.
the next thing you know they're on their toes......what the hell does that mean ?


it's all,, 'Hollandaise"' to me !!     :roll:    good nite.....


Title: Lively Case Discussion #522 9/10 - 9/12/2006
Post by: klaasend on September 12, 2006, 06:48:38 PM
Quote from: "igsigs"
Quote from: "klaasend"
NEW FRONT PAGE POST:

Natalee Holloway Investigation: Abraham Jones June 5, 2005 Statement

Thanks Klaas & RED...

So...what's here?

-Jones and John worked dayshift at Allegro.
-Contract expired on 6/1.
-Worked in 3's, actually 2's...with 1 guard ditching work on rotating basis.
-John smoked, did not deal.
-John hit on tourists.

Need John's statement for comparison.

Be patient, it takes time.  It will be next though.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #522 9/10 - 9/12/2006
Post by: yapperz1 on September 12, 2006, 06:50:42 PM
<snip>
I wore a uniform existing of dark blue trousers and a white shirt.

Abraham Jones uniform don't match the black shirt & trousers.
Sounds like they were going to use the guards as scapegoats to me.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #522 9/10 - 9/12/2006
Post by: klaasend on September 12, 2006, 06:53:24 PM
Quote from: "yapperz1"
<snip>
I wore a uniform existing of dark blue trousers and a white shirt.

Abraham Jones uniform don't match the black shirt & trousers.
Sounds like they were going to use the guards as scapegoats to me.


Ya think?  :wink:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #522 9/10 - 9/12/2006
Post by: BTgirl on September 12, 2006, 06:58:24 PM
Quote from: "thik"

''authorities area on the heels of these three mystery suspects''

who writes this stuff.......   (skeptisism abounds)


umm...no offense meant to anyone, but I think ooScarboroughoo is the person who......umm.....dreams Natalee's last moments and writes about the dreams.  :?


Title: Lively Case Discussion #522 9/10 - 9/12/2006
Post by: klaasend on September 12, 2006, 06:59:11 PM
Quote from: "BTgirl"
Quote from: "thik"

''authorities area on the heels of these three mystery suspects''

who writes this stuff.......   (skeptisism abounds)


umm...no offense meant to anyone, but I think ooScarboroughoo is the person who......umm.....dreams Natalee's last moments and writes about the dreams.  :?

That's what I thought  :wink:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #522 9/10 - 9/12/2006
Post by: igsigs on September 12, 2006, 06:59:50 PM
Quote from: "klaasend"
Quote from: "igsigs"

Need John's statement for comparison.

Be patient, it takes time.  It will be next though.

Thanks. No intention to express impatience, sorry for that. I was just noting that both SGs statements are needed for comparison.

Will there be a FOM statement? :lol:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #522 9/10 - 9/12/2006
Post by: yapperz1 on September 12, 2006, 07:09:29 PM
Don't know about that BT but he/she may have a contact. Who knows. Or it could be they are talking with the other person living in their head (like some others I know)


Title: Lively Case Discussion #522 9/10 - 9/12/2006
Post by: Sue on September 12, 2006, 07:11:26 PM
Quote from: "yapperz1"
from BFN:

Source:  New lead in Holloway case the last thing you'd ever expect
by:  ooSCARBOROUGHoo, www.ooSCARBOROUGHoo.eponym.com

I was just recently informed by a confidential Dutch source of mine that Garrison's new witness has lead investigators to a new lead in the Natalee Holloway case.  This source told me that the new lead involves 3 mystery suspects who are completely new to the suspect list.  This source also told me that Dutch and Aruban law enforcement were so suprised and shocked with this lead, the source said "its the last thing you'd ever expect."

Unfortunately, my source could not elaborate further on the details of these 3 new mystery suspects.  My source did say that they are trying to keep this under wraps from the media.  They are afaird of these 3 mystery suspects being a flight risk because they are no longer living in Dutch territory.  My source also told me that law enforcment is on the heels of these 3 mystery suspects, but called the lead "promising."

I asked my source if this is just going to be another catch-and-release tactic to show the world they are still working on the Natalee Holloway case.  My source said that because of the details Garrison's witness was able to provide, my source highly doubts it.  My source went on to say that Dutch investigators are a little ticked at Garrison for dropping the bomb on ABC News' "Good Morning America" program.  My source said "...Garrison rang the bell to millions of Americans that we were following a promising tip... Garrison gave details in the interview that the new witness "knows who is involved."

My source worries that because of Garrison alluding to the fact that their might be multiple suspects, this may tip the mystery suspects off that Dutch investigators are on their toes.

Now, when I first heard this information from my source, I was shocked, because I already have my theory about what happened that night.  But I remembered to keep an open mind, because Aruban's definition of "suspect" is different from ours.  These 3 mystery "people" could lead investigators to the perp, they may be witnesses, they may have information that investigators want, or they may be the perps themselves.  We have to keep an open mind, but I could tell that my source is excited about this tip so maybe we are a step closer to solving the case of Natalee Holloway



this kid is  TROLL over in BFN chat running his stupid mouth with all his I want to be somebody He is so full of crap his eyes are brown
go READ his dream he had about what happen to Natalee and you will know he is a freakin NUT CASE


Title: Lively Case Discussion #522 9/10 - 9/12/2006
Post by: klaasend on September 12, 2006, 07:13:16 PM
:lol: Sue - why don't you tell us how you really feel about him, lol  :lol:

By the way, I agree with your assessment  :wink:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #522 9/10 - 9/12/2006
Post by: Sue on September 12, 2006, 07:13:54 PM
Quote from: "klaasend"
:lol: Sue - why don't you tell us how you really feel about him, lol  :lol:

By the way, I agree with your assessment  :wink:


 :oops:  Well Klaas I was trying to tell you :D


Title: Lively Case Discussion #522 9/10 - 9/12/2006
Post by: oldfart on September 12, 2006, 07:16:01 PM
Good Day Monkeys...

It is supposed to get below 60 here to night  :shock:   Brrrrrrrrrrrrr


Where and what would be the "container harbour" on Aruba?
The term was used in one of the brothers early statements??

TIA


Title: Lively Case Discussion #522 9/10 - 9/12/2006
Post by: BTgirl on September 12, 2006, 07:19:15 PM
Quote from: "yapperz1"
Don't know about that BT but he/she may have a contact. Who knows. Or it could be they are talking with the other person living in their head (like some others I know)


Hey! Don't talk about me that way!

I only talk with the sock monkeys living in my head. :lol:  :lol:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #522 9/10 - 9/12/2006
Post by: klaasend on September 12, 2006, 07:19:32 PM
Quote from: "oldfart"
Good Day Monkeys...

It is supposed to get below 60 here to night  :shock:   Brrrrrrrrrrrrr


Where and what would be the "container harbour" on Aruba?
The term was used in one of the brothers early statements??

TIA

I believe it was in reference to where Jaime C was working at the time, but I could be mistaken.  Here is some information I just looked up:
http://www.arubaports.com/cargo/

Aruba Ports Authority Cargo Services - Oranjestad


Overview

The port of Oranjestad, the currently main commercial harbor of Aruba, is situated on the south-western end of the island. The port is open for day and night navigation, allowing vessels to enter and leave at any hour. The port is part of the capital, Oranjestad, which makes an impressive sight upon entering of the harbor. The ships moor within walking distance from the shopping centers, a 10 minute drive from the beaches, and a little over 2 miles from the international airport.

The port of Oranjestad also serves all the containerized cargo handling. This adjacent cargo facility is equipped with a 50 ton gantry crane with a loading rate of 20-30 moves per hour and has 250 meters of quay length. This facility is used primarily for processing the imports for local consumption and the remaining represents Free-Zone type and transshipment cargo. In 2003, 216 container vessels were handled at the Oranjetsad Port and over 16, 450 container boxes moved.


Title: KatzHome and Thanks all for the nice Birthday 9/11
Post by: IBE on September 12, 2006, 07:37:05 PM
KatzHome  OT

Heard on p 41 you are a MAC user! Yes we are very loyal. Not sure if I will buy the new chip one in the future.

I have used Netscape for over a decade and now vs. 7.1. with OS x 10.3.9 for I don't want to upgrade. I think there is a newer version of Netscape for the MAC.. download free (takes long time at 56k) Manual can dl too or can buy the CD. Hear Foxfire is good. I like Netscape for its security vs IE. Never never went to IE because it was easier to hack. While I am still OT... what do you use for spyware etc?

Again, Monkeys, you all made my birthday yesterday so much happier for it was such a sad day. Got an email from a cousin, a mudslide from a friend at the American Legion (hence nap) and the special thread you did and the wishes on this thread!. This was the nicest birthday I have had since 9/11, 2001 which was the last one with my mom.

I love you all!!! Natalee will get Justice on this earth!

Love and God Bless,

"IBE" back to catching up on the thread pages.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #522 9/10 - 9/12/2006
Post by: oldfart on September 12, 2006, 07:37:32 PM
Klaasend
thanks.... I was thinking it was South or Oranjestad and I was wrong in one of the brothers mentioning it.  It was Joran  6/09 statement.

"I have to say that while we were driving past the front of the container harbour, Natalee told me that her mother was the sister of "Hitler". I laughed and did not ask her what she meant by that. She had said this to me about five times. "

Thanks and sorry  :oops:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #522 9/10 - 9/12/2006
Post by: yapperz1 on September 12, 2006, 07:39:23 PM
BT..you know exactly who I am talking about   :lol:

As far as Scarborough goes....may be just another nut in the basketful we have seen in this case.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #522 9/10 - 9/12/2006
Post by: yapperz1 on September 12, 2006, 07:49:14 PM
OF the container harbor is near the airport

<snip>
http://tinyurl.com/e4mtr
location of the current container harbor near the airport


Title: Quotes and follow the music
Post by: IBE on September 12, 2006, 07:51:01 PM
Hi I am still a few pages back, so sorry if someone has already posted this idea at the bottom

Quote
Lala'sMom wrote:
Hello everyone. Just a quick post here to tell those who wanted to know that CP405 is allright. She's had her precious grandbaby with her for the past week. I think maybe she has been a bit under the weather also. Maybe she will check in with us later. Nemo is fine too.

BTW connection between SC and the others...Freddy? Lorenzo? Porn videos? Keep thinking monkeys.


Quote
Hotshot:
Thee only thing I can tell you is, Steve told me Lorenzo used to work at the Bahia as a DJ. Thats the one thing they have in common. Oh, and they all go there might be another thing in common


Quote
Msmarple
I may have the Cast of Characters mixed up, but doesn't Lorenzo have that "mobile party audio van" - crazy painted, we have a pix ("editorial we" - Klaas?  )

Uh, DJ connections very likely ...


Shango said to follow the music. Is Lorenzo the one whose pictures we used to have that was taken outside with music, stage scaffling in the back and a bunch of tatoos on his fingers?


Title: Lively Case Discussion #522 9/10 - 9/12/2006
Post by: klaasend on September 12, 2006, 07:52:56 PM
Quote from: "oldfart"
Klaasend
thanks.... I was thinking it was South or Oranjestad and I was wrong in one of the brothers mentioning it.  It was Joran  6/09 statement.

"I have to say that while we were driving past the front of the container harbour, Natalee told me that her mother was the sister of "Hitler". I laughed and did not ask her what she meant by that. She had said this to me about five times. "

Thanks and sorry  :oops:

Looks like there are 2 cargo terminals, Oranjestad and Barcadera.  Look at the Cargo Services link, there's a dropdown and you can see an aerial view.  The Barcadera appears to be near the area that Ed Dames is searching in.

http://www.arubaports.com/cargo/


Title: Lively Case Discussion #522 9/10 - 9/12/2006
Post by: Kat_Gram on September 12, 2006, 08:05:04 PM
To sleep with the fishes... Would not be delicious ! !
Seriously, Aruba has been tougher on " witnesses " than they have been on the three prime suspects.
They ( based on Michael Dompig's lies ) ask Geoffrey V C to come to the police station. He does not leave until they have " suspicioned " him. He  is also charged with possession of drugs ? But then, no charges are laid.
Duh ?
..
The gardener was not believed...
BTW I read the new statement.
Another Duh ?
What was the probable casue ?
Never saw Natalee, and he is a person of color.
If you knew something, would you trust the ALE ?
You might know it because you did it ! ! Unless you were Dutch and you last name began with Van Der.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #522 9/10 - 9/12/2006
Post by: yapperz1 on September 12, 2006, 08:07:49 PM
Klaas, I think what OF is saying is how can they be going to California lighthouse if they passed the continer harbor??? I think he has a point & they went towards Colorado lighthouse instead.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #522 9/10 - 9/12/2006
Post by: San on September 12, 2006, 08:10:01 PM
Quote from: "klaasend"
Quote from: "oldfart"
Good Day Monkeys...

It is supposed to get below 60 here to night  :shock:   Brrrrrrrrrrrrr


Where and what would be the "container harbour" on Aruba?
The term was used in one of the brothers early statements??

TIA

I believe it was in reference to where Jaime C was working at the time, but I could be mistaken.  Here is some information I just looked up:
http://www.arubaports.com/cargo/

Aruba Ports Authority Cargo Services - Oranjestad


{{Edited}}


So Jaime C was working at a port at the time Natalee was missing.  Last time we saw a picture of Jaime he was cleaning tables.  I wonder why he isn't working at the port anymore.  Do you think he is trying to distance himself from something.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #522 9/10 - 9/12/2006
Post by: oldfart on September 12, 2006, 08:12:36 PM
Quote from: "klaasend"
Quote from: "oldfart"
Klaasend
thanks.... I was thinking it was South or Oranjestad and I was wrong in one of the brothers mentioning it.  It was Joran  6/09 statement.

"I have to say that while we were driving past the front of the container harbour, Natalee told me that her mother was the sister of "Hitler". I laughed and did not ask her what she meant by that. She had said this to me about five times. "

Thanks and sorry  :oops:

Looks like there are 2 cargo terminals, Oranjestad and Barcadera.  Look at the Cargo Services link, there's a dropdown and you can see an aerial view.  The Barcadera appears to be near the area that Ed Dames is searching in.

http://www.arubaports.com/cargo/


klaasend
I found the Barcadera port after you pointed it out...
Going by this Oranjestad arieal http://www.arubaports.com/images/lg_p_ostadport6.jpg  
they may have driven part the container area ??
And yes I'm still looking for a a way to put them  East / South of Oranjestad  :roll:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #522 9/10 - 9/12/2006
Post by: oldfart on September 12, 2006, 08:16:22 PM
Quote from: "yapperz1"
Klaas, I think what OF is saying is how can they be going to California lighthouse if they passed the continer harbor??? I think he has a point & they went towards Colorado lighthouse instead.


yapperz
I was going to respond to you but then Klaasend pointed out the other port (Barcadera)
Hard as I look ... I do not seen any contianers at that port


Title: Lively Case Discussion #522 9/10 - 9/12/2006
Post by: oldfart on September 12, 2006, 08:19:13 PM
Tap..
Tap...Tap

Test...

Did I break this thingy  again :shock:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #522 9/10 - 9/12/2006
Post by: JA on September 12, 2006, 08:22:34 PM
Didn't Garrison actually allude to the fact that the three witness/suspects he is talking about are three that have been arrested already?  He didn't come out and say J2DK, but one can surmise that is a likely possibility.

That story about it being three individuals that they haven't even questioned sounds fishy to say the least.  They are outside Aruba and Aruban LE is keeping an eye on them, but haven't pulled them in for questioning?  I doubt it.  IF this was true, that means they haven't come back to Aruba after leaving right after she went missing?


Title: Lively Case Discussion #522 9/10 - 9/12/2006
Post by: klaasend on September 12, 2006, 08:24:02 PM
Quote from: "JA"
Didn't Garrison actually allude to the fact that the three witness/suspects he is talking about are three that have been arrested already?  He didn't come out and say J2DK, but one can surmise that is a likely possibility.

That story about it being three individuals that they haven't even questioned sounds fishy to say the least.  They are outside Aruba and Aruban LE is keeping an eye on them, but haven't pulled them in for questioning?  I doubt it.  IF this was true, that means they haven't come back to Aruba after leaving right after she went missing?


Yes, and I don't believe the other story for one second. :wink:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #522 9/10 - 9/12/2006
Post by: yapperz1 on September 12, 2006, 08:24:05 PM
OF, if I am reading this correctly the new container harbor will be around Barcadera

New Cruise Facilities For Aruba In Planning Stage

Prime Minister Nelson Oduber of Aruba announced recently a modern and luxurious cruise terminal would be built in the near future to accommodate the growing cruise market. The proposed terminal would be in the location of the current container harbor near the airport. Plans call for the relocation of the container port facilities to be relocated to Barcadera, located south of the Queen Beatrix International Airport.
The Government of Aruba commissioned ALATEC, a Spanish company to complete a study and to come with a design which includes ideas of moving the cargo area to Barcadera and to evaluate the opportunities of transforming the former cargo area into an area for condominiums and mega yachts. Another project in the works is to create an architectural plan for the wharf area.
With this move the Government of Aruba hopes to boost the cruise tourism to Aruba even more. During October 2004 Aruba welcomed 56,482 cruise guests, a sizeable increase from October 2003 when Aruba received 20,756 cruise guests. Major cruise lines calling at Aruba include Royal Caribbean, Carnival, and Princess Cruises.
Details of the proposed terminal will be announced shortly, says a spokesperson for Aruba Tourism.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #522 9/10 - 9/12/2006
Post by: JA on September 12, 2006, 08:27:02 PM
LOL Does anyone really know who the real Lorenzo is, and if he really exists?

If he does, I wonder if he ever comes on here and other sites and laughs at all the descriptions or him.

Will the real Lorenzo please come forward and take accountability for his existence! :lol:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #522 9/10 - 9/12/2006
Post by: klaasend on September 12, 2006, 08:30:26 PM
Quote from: "JA"
LOL Does anyone really know who the real Lorenzo is, and if he really exists?

If he does, I wonder if he ever comes on here and other sites and laughs at all the descriptions or him.

Will the real Lorenzo please come forward and take accountability for his existence! :lol:

I know he really exists.  His name is Lorenzo Van Rijn, his father committed suicide and his mother's name is Astrid.  He is a real person and according to some Aruban posters was one of the first people questioned very early in the case.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #522 9/10 - 9/12/2006
Post by: dkpen on September 12, 2006, 08:30:43 PM
Quote from: "KatzHome"
Quote from: "the big hammer"
Steve Croes at C&C's...

Spock writes: "Has everyone else noticed that Deepak declared that Steve Croes was at C&C the same time Joran, Satish, Deepak and Natalee were? Doesn't it make more sense now that Steve acted as a witness to the security guard drop-off lie."

Yes, Spock, good catch.

The sleeping night watchman of Tatoo seems to be neglecting his duties.

As a complete fabrication of actually "seeing" the HI drop off which never happened, IMO, this strongly suggests a second vehicle could be in the mix here.

How did Steve get to C&C's is an important question to answer.


Yeah ~ and we never heard that before Hammer...  sure does explain why he decided to come forward to "help out his friend"  :roll: That story NEVER made sense to me ~ and I was raising OF's "BS Flag" over it back when I was posting on WS...

Going on memory alone (which isn't all that good) but, wasn't there some talk about a car being seen in the side mirrow of one of the cars from some night...  I'm sorry I'm so vague about it...  Does anyone remember?



Hi everyone!

KatzHome, not sure if anyone answered but I remember this from long ago. Someone posted a picture, I think on WebSlueths, and then within mins. took it back down.

It was a picture, seems to have been taken from infront of Deepaks car. Appeared to had been taken from inside a window? Anyways, the picture was of the boys getting in the car with Natalee. Was a white car I believe was said that looked like someone who had taken the picture? Could see the back side of the car through the window that was infront of Deepaks car? Something like that, if I recall.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #522 9/10 - 9/12/2006
Post by: oldfart on September 12, 2006, 08:32:16 PM
Modified verison of a joke...  I got today :wink:
Fits my day better

I called one of my sons and said, "Please come over here and help me.
I have a killer jigsaw puzzle, and I can't figure out how to get it started."

"Son  asks, "What is it supposed to be when it's finished?"
I say  "According to the picture on the box, it's a tiger."

Son decides to come over and help with the puzzle.
I let him in and show him where I have the puzzle spread all over the table.

He studies the pieces for a moment, then looks at the box, then turns to
me and says, "DAD...First of all, no matter what we do, we're not going to be able to assemble these pieces into anything resembling a tiger."
 
He says, "Second, I want you to relax.  Let's have a nice cup of coffee, then ...", he sighed, "DAD... Do you want me to  help you  put the Frosted Flakes back in the box?"
 :shock:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #522 9/10 - 9/12/2006
Post by: San on September 12, 2006, 08:35:47 PM
Quote from: "klaasend"
Quote from: "JA"
LOL Does anyone really know who the real Lorenzo is, and if he really exists?

If he does, I wonder if he ever comes on here and other sites and laughs at all the descriptions or him.

Will the real Lorenzo please come forward and take accountability for his existence! :lol:

I know he really exists.  His name is Lorenzo Van Rijn, his father committed suicide and his mother's name is Astrid.  He is a real person and according to some Aruban posters was one of the first people questioned very early in the case.

Klaas do you know how long ago his father committed suicide.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #522 9/10 - 9/12/2006
Post by: klaasend on September 12, 2006, 08:37:59 PM
Quote from: "San"
Quote from: "klaasend"
Quote from: "JA"
LOL Does anyone really know who the real Lorenzo is, and if he really exists?

If he does, I wonder if he ever comes on here and other sites and laughs at all the descriptions or him.

Will the real Lorenzo please come forward and take accountability for his existence! :lol:

I know he really exists.  His name is Lorenzo Van Rijn, his father committed suicide and his mother's name is Astrid.  He is a real person and according to some Aruban posters was one of the first people questioned very early in the case.

Klaas do you know how long ago his father committed suicide.

I'll have to look it up.  

Need to fix dinner right now though, BRB


Title: Lively Case Discussion #522 9/10 - 9/12/2006
Post by: justinsmama on September 12, 2006, 08:40:15 PM
Quote from: "JA"
LOL Does anyone really know who the real Lorenzo is, and if he really exists?

If he does, I wonder if he ever comes on here and other sites and laughs at all the descriptions or him.

Will the real Lorenzo please come forward and take accountability for his existence! :lol:


Or if he has been/is among us?


Title: Lively Case Discussion #522 9/10 - 9/12/2006
Post by: oldfart on September 12, 2006, 08:44:57 PM
Gee..
I was hoping my joke would generate some posts  so we could move into a clean cage..

Any votes for moving early because we can divide the year /month /day by three and get 2 / 3  / 4    out the door !!  :wink:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #522 9/10 - 9/12/2006
Post by: klaasend on September 12, 2006, 08:50:34 PM
Quote from: "oldfart"
Gee..
I was hoping my joke would generate some posts  so we could move into a clean cage..

Any votes for moving early because we can divide the year /month /day by three and get 2 / 3  / 4    out the door !!  :wink:

Don't rush it, cooking dinner right now.  :wink:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #522 9/10 - 9/12/2006
Post by: NM on September 12, 2006, 08:52:13 PM
Quote from: "oldfart"
Modified verison of a joke...  I got today :wink:
Fits my day better

I called one of my sons and said, "Please come over here and help me.
I have a killer jigsaw puzzle, and I can't figure out how to get it started."

"Son  asks, "What is it supposed to be when it's finished?"
I say  "According to the picture on the box, it's a tiger."

Son decides to come over and help with the puzzle.
I let him in and show him where I have the puzzle spread all over the table.

He studies the pieces for a moment, then looks at the box, then turns to
me and says, "DAD...First of all, no matter what we do, we're not going to be able to assemble these pieces into anything resembling a tiger."
 
He says, "Second, I want you to relax.  Let's have a nice cup of coffee, then ...", he sighed, "DAD... Do you want me to  help you  put the Frosted Flakes back in the box?"
 :shock:

OF,
I'm sorry I was laughing too hard. I'll cont. laughing here to help our cause.
 :lol:
 :lol:
 :lol:
 :lol:
 :lol:
 :lol:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #522 9/10 - 9/12/2006
Post by: NM on September 12, 2006, 08:52:50 PM
Rats!
 :lol:
 :lol:
 :lol:
 :lol:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #522 9/10 - 9/12/2006
Post by: oldfart on September 12, 2006, 08:54:30 PM
Quote from: "klaasend"
Quote from: "oldfart"
Gee..
I was hoping my joke would generate some posts  so we could move into a clean cage..

Any votes for moving early because we can divide the year /month /day by three and get 2 / 3  / 4    out the door !!  :wink:

Don't rush it, cooking dinner right now.  :wink:


You have the room ready... Just locked...
and this would give you More time to work on dinner :wink:  :wink:

Just Wondering...


Title: Lively Case Discussion #522 9/10 - 9/12/2006
Post by: oldfart on September 12, 2006, 08:56:10 PM
Bump... de .. Bump . Bump

Modified verison of a joke...  I got today :wink:
Fits my day better

I called one of my sons and said, "Please come over here and help me.
I have a killer jigsaw puzzle, and I can't figure out how to get it started."

"Son  asks, "What is it supposed to be when it's finished?"
I say  "According to the picture on the box, it's a tiger."

Son decides to come over and help with the puzzle.
I let him in and show him where I have the puzzle spread all over the table.

He studies the pieces for a moment, then looks at the box, then turns to
me and says, "DAD...First of all, no matter what we do, we're not going to be able to assemble these pieces into anything resembling a tiger."
 
He says, "Second, I want you to relax.  Let's have a nice cup of coffee, then ...", he sighed, "DAD... Do you want me to  help you  put the Frosted Flakes back in the box?"
 :shock


Title: Lively Case Discussion #522 9/10 - 9/12/2006
Post by: Carnut on September 12, 2006, 08:56:19 PM
Incredible story about an elephants memory....


A young man was on holiday in Kenya after graduating from college. While he was walking through the bush, he came across a young bull elephant standing with one leg raised in the air. The elephant seemed distressed so the man approached it very carefully. He got down on one knee and inspected the elephant’s foot. There was a large thorn deeply imbedded in the bottom of the foot.


As carefully and as gently as he could he worked the thorn ou with his hunting knife, after which the elephant gingerly put down its foot. The elephant turned toface the man and with a rather stern look, stared at him. For a good ten minutes the man stood frozen – think of nothing else but being trampled. Eventually the elephant trumpeted loudly, turned and walked away.

The man never forgot that elephant or the events of that day. Twenty years later the man was walking through the zoo with his teenage son. As they approached the elephant enclosure, on of the creatures turned and walked over to where they were standing at the rail. The large bull elephant stared at him and then lifted it’s front foot off the ground, then put it down. The elephant did that sever times, all the while staring at the man. The man couldn’t help wondering if the was the same elephant. After a while it trumpeted loudly, the it continued to stare at him. The man summoned up his courage, climbed of the railing and made his way into the enclosure. He walked right up to the elephant and started back in wonder. Suddenly the elephant trumpeted again, wrapped its trunk around on of the man’s lets and swung him wildly back and forth along the railing, killing him.




Probably wasn’t the same elephant.


GOTCHA!!!


Title: Lively Case Discussion #522 9/10 - 9/12/2006
Post by: NM on September 12, 2006, 08:56:31 PM
Sorry Klaas. Let me help out now.


Hi SAN,
http://www.scaredmonkeys.net/viewtopic.php?t=2823&start=940
Chicago_510
I found a record of the death of a Paul van Rijn on October 20, 2001. His wife's name was listed as Astrid van Rijn-Traskel. I then found an Astrid Louise van Rijn-Traskel who was registered to vote in Aruba for 2005-2006. I have her address, it is in Savaneta.

I believe someone verified that Lorenzo's father was Paul van Rijn.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #522 9/10 - 9/12/2006
Post by: oldfart on September 12, 2006, 08:57:58 PM
Pssst  

the door in open... but I do not dare be first


Bump  de bump


Title: Lively Case Discussion #522 9/10 - 9/12/2006
Post by: NM on September 12, 2006, 08:59:14 PM
too funny carnut
 :lol:
 :lol:
 :lol:
 :lol:
soory klaas, but that was also a funny joke.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #522 9/10 - 9/12/2006
Post by: oldfart on September 12, 2006, 08:59:35 PM
Quote from: "Carnut"
Incredible story about an elephants memory....


A young man was on holiday in Kenya after graduating from college. While he was walking through the bush, he came across a young bull elephant standing with one leg raised in the air. The elephant seemed distressed so the man approached it very carefully. He got down on one knee and inspected the elephant’s foot. There was a large thorn deeply imbedded in the bottom of the foot.


As carefully and as gently as he could he worked the thorn ou with his hunting knife, after which the elephant gingerly put down its foot. The elephant turned toface the man and with a rather stern look, stared at him. For a good ten minutes the man stood frozen – think of nothing else but being trampled. Eventually the elephant trumpeted loudly, turned and walked away.

The man never forgot that elephant or the events of that day. Twenty years later the man was walking through the zoo with his teenage son. As they approached the elephant enclosure, on of the creatures turned and walked over to where they were standing at the rail. The large bull elephant stared at him and then lifted it’s front foot off the ground, then put it down. The elephant did that sever times, all the while staring at the man. The man couldn’t help wondering if the was the same elephant. After a while it trumpeted loudly, the it continued to stare at him. The man summoned up his courage, climbed of the railing and made his way into the enclosure. He walked right up to the elephant and started back in wonder. Suddenly the elephant trumpeted again, wrapped its trunk around on of the man’s lets and swung him wildly back and forth along the railing, killing him.




Probably wasn’t the same elephant.


GOTCHA!!!

 :lol:  :lol:  :lol:  :lol:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #522 9/10 - 9/12/2006
Post by: klaasend on September 12, 2006, 09:02:12 PM
(http://i14.photobucket.com/albums/a306/klaasend/nowlocked.jpg)

Please move to LCD# 523

http://www.scaredmonkeys.net/viewtopic.php?t=338


Title: Lively Case Discussion #522 9/10 - 9/12/2006
Post by: San on September 12, 2006, 09:02:55 PM
Quote from: "NM"
Sorry Klaas. Let me help out now.


Hi SAN,
http://www.scaredmonkeys.net/viewtopic.php?t=2823&start=940
Chicago_510
I found a record of the death of a Paul van Rijn on October 20, 2001. His wife's name was listed as Astrid van Rijn-Traskel. I then found an Astrid Louise van Rijn-Traskel who was registered to vote in Aruba for 2005-2006. I have her address, it is in Savaneta.

I believe someone verified that Lorenzo's father was Paul van Rijn.

Thank you NM.

I remember reading that Lorenzo's real father was Paulus Van der Sloot.  Paulus probably has kids all over that island.

This is going to sound mean but I am questioning how his father died.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #522 9/10 - 9/12/2006
Post by: klaasend on September 12, 2006, 09:03:40 PM
Quote from: "San"
Quote from: "NM"
Sorry Klaas. Let me help out now.


Hi SAN,
http://www.scaredmonkeys.net/viewtopic.php?t=2823&start=940
Chicago_510
I found a record of the death of a Paul van Rijn on October 20, 2001. His wife's name was listed as Astrid van Rijn-Traskel. I then found an Astrid Louise van Rijn-Traskel who was registered to vote in Aruba for 2005-2006. I have her address, it is in Savaneta.

I believe someone verified that Lorenzo's father was Paul van Rijn.

Thank you NM.

I remember reading that Lorenzo's real father was Paulus Van der Sloot.  Paulus probably has kids all over that island.

This is going to sound mean but I am questioning how his father died.


(http://i14.photobucket.com/albums/a306/klaasend/nowlocked.jpg)