Scared Monkeys Discussion Forum

Natalee Holloway => LCD Archive => Topic started by: Nut44x4 on December 18, 2008, 06:41:58 PM



Title: Natalee Case Discussion #787 12/24/08 - 12/31/08
Post by: Nut44x4 on December 18, 2008, 06:41:58 PM
http://i118.photobucket.com/albums/o100/klaasen3/Sub3/Natalee2.swf



JUSTICE FOR NATALEE


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #787
Post by: klaasend on December 24, 2008, 01:57:26 AM
GOODNIGHT ALL!


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #787
Post by: texasmom on December 24, 2008, 02:37:58 AM
GOODNIGHT ALL!



Goodnight Klaas!


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #787
Post by: johan555 on December 24, 2008, 03:32:00 AM
Merry Christmas everyone !!!!!!!!!!!


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #787
Post by: texasmom on December 24, 2008, 03:32:19 AM
If anyone would like to join me in lighting a candle for Natalee this is the link:

http://www.gratefulness.org/candles/candles.cfm?l=eng&gi=NAH


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #787
Post by: texasmom on December 24, 2008, 03:32:57 AM
Merry Christmas everyone !!!!!!!!!!!

Merry Christmas Johan!!!!!


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #787
Post by: texasmom on December 24, 2008, 04:02:06 AM
(http://i21.photobucket.com/albums/b258/texasmom55/Greetings/MerryChristmasJesus.gif)

Wishing everyone peace, joy, and love this Christmas!


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #787
Post by: Cageman on December 24, 2008, 04:06:54 AM
 
Quote from: texasmom
but I think this says that the island is viewed in a negative light because of the "mother", and regardless of whether or not they prosecute; it will be viewed in a negative light.  If this is what it says; they need to wake up and smell the coffee (deadly as it may be) and put the blame where it belongs!

Well, actually, there is no mention of the mother in that specific article. It says that the decision to prosecute Joran (or not) has been postponed to February, because of the new tips and that they hope that there will be a solution because otherwise the case of the American girl will harm the island. (Rather free translation!)

Probably the words "e mucha muher Mericano" are mistaken: it just means "the female American child" or in normal English "the American girl".





Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #787
Post by: Buckeye on December 24, 2008, 04:28:27 AM
Cageman

Thank you for the translation. Papiamentu is difficult.

I am thinking of your family.  Prayers for all of you.



Merry Christmas, everyone.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #787
Post by: texasmom on December 24, 2008, 04:36:17 AM
Quote from: texasmom
but I think this says that the island is viewed in a negative light because of the "mother", and regardless of whether or not they prosecute; it will be viewed in a negative light.  If this is what it says; they need to wake up and smell the coffee (deadly as it may be) and put the blame where it belongs!

Well, actually, there is no mention of the mother in that specific article. It says that the decision to prosecute Joran (or not) has been postponed to February, because of the new tips and that they hope that there will be a solution because otherwise the case of the American girl will harm the island. (Rather free translation!)

Probably the words "e mucha muher Mericano" are mistaken: it just means "the female American child" or in normal English "the American girl".


Thank you very much for clarifying that for us Cageman.  I sincerely apologize to everyone for my misinterpretation and any comments I made because of it!  (http://scaredmonkeys.net/Smileys/default/icon_redface.gif)


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #787
Post by: MumInOhio on December 24, 2008, 04:47:29 AM
Truthseeker...We have Jaime's address as Montanja 232 in Shango. He then moved in with his sister. Finngirl may have more on this as she ws asking for the house to be shown on Johan's map the other day. There is also an alternate spelling in Finn's "We Forgot We Knew" thread in Shango...Think it is post 7, for his surname.

I have always thought it suspicious that Joran was out with the Kalpoes 2 nights in a row, when he always hung out with Jaime and Freddy.

My thoughts and Prayers are with Cageman and Pdh3 and their Families this Christmas. And with all the Families of the Missing.

Merry Christmas Monkeys.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #787
Post by: Cageman on December 24, 2008, 06:36:18 AM
Thank you all for your prayers and sympathy. I really appreciate this!

Merry Christmas to you all!!


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #787 12/24/08 -
Post by: Frijole on December 24, 2008, 08:14:03 AM
Monkeys... just wanted to wish each of you a very merry Christmas and the best for 2009.  Peace and love.

Frijole


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #787 12/24/08 -
Post by: sharon on December 24, 2008, 09:22:38 AM
Warmest wishes for a beautiful holiday season --


SNIPPED FROM JORAN'S JUNE 9 STATEMENT

After that I walked outside through the casino and when I got outside I called my father from my mobile phone which has the number "REMOVED" on the mobile phone of my mother. My mother has a mobile phone with the number "REMOVED". I called my father on that phone because my mother was outside of the country and my father had her phone in his possession. When I called my father it was approximately 23.00 hours. I told my father that I was ready and if he could come and pick me up at "Mc Donalds". After that I had called my friend "Jaime CARASQUILLA" on his mobile phone. I do not know his phone number from memory but I have programmed his mobile phone number in the memory of my mobile phone under the name "Beto". I asked Beto what he was doing and whether he wanted to accompany me in going to Carlos & Charlies. Beto answered me that he was doing nothing but that he could not accompany me to Carlos & Charlies because he had to go to work the next day. Beto works with a transport company but I do not know the name of that company. After that I called Deepak KALPOE and asked him what he was doing and if he wanted to come with me to Carlos & Charlies. Deepak told me he was closing up "Inex" and that he would accompany me to Carlos & Charlies because he didn't have to go to work the next day.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #787 12/24/08 -
Post by: bastibro on December 24, 2008, 09:42:17 AM
(http://i272.photobucket.com/albums/jj176/bastibro/Laos/Joranneke_0004-2-1-1.jpg)

I think the guy next to Urine is for a 95% Luke and the third who was with them than would be this teacher moron.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #787
Post by: Blue Moon on December 24, 2008, 09:43:28 AM
If anyone would like to join me in lighting a candle for Natalee this is the link:

http://www.gratefulness.org/candles/candles.cfm?l=eng&gi=NAH

I just lit my candle for Natalee and Dave and Beth.  This last 3 1/2 years has not brought the answers this family needs so I am still here with the rest of the Monkeys who will fight forever as long as needed to BRING JUSTICE FOR NATALEE AND BRING HER HOME TO THE UNITED STATES AND HER FAMILY.

I want to wish all a very Merry Christmas and a prosperous New Year.  Thanks Red, Dugga and most important thanks to the Klaas and all her helpers that keep Natalee's name alive and in the minds of the U.S. and most important Aruba of the injustice done to an American citizen.  You all are the greatest.  Answers have to be forthcoming from Aruba before this chapter can be closed.  They need to understand we will fight the fight until Beth says it is over and She has not told me me that.

MERRY CHRISTMAS TO ALL.

Blue Moon of KY


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #787 12/24/08 -
Post by: Ono on December 24, 2008, 09:52:51 AM
       ~ MERRY CHRISTMAS EVERYONE !  JUSTICE FOR NATALEE IN 2009 ~


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #787 12/24/08 -
Post by: Blue Moon on December 24, 2008, 09:57:24 AM
(http://i272.photobucket.com/albums/jj176/bastibro/Laos/Joranneke_0004-2-1-1.jpg)

I think the guy next to Urine is for a 95% Luke and the third who was with them than would be this teacher moron.

He's on the run but he cannot go far enough to vanish the memory of Natalee.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #787
Post by: truthseeker2 on December 24, 2008, 10:42:02 AM
Truthseeker...We have Jaime's address as Montanja 232 in Shango. He then moved in with his sister. Finngirl may have more on this as she ws asking for the house to be shown on Johan's map the other day. There is also an alternate spelling in Finn's "We Forgot We Knew" thread in Shango...Think it is post 7, for his surname.

I have always thought it suspicious that Joran was out with the Kalpoes 2 nights in a row, when he always hung out with Jaime and Freddy.

My thoughts and Prayers are with Cageman and Pdh3 and their Families this Christmas. And with all the Families of the Missing.

Merry Christmas Monkeys.

Hi Mum,

Thanks for the info.

If you put three days together, 05/28, 05/29 and 05/30 you have Joran, Deepak and Satish out together two nights in a row and Joran and Deepak out together three nights in a row.  Also, Andre puts himself in the Holiday Inn casino on 05/29 and says he actually walked over to the blackjack table where Joran was sitting with the MB kids.  Joran is out the next night with Andre, so he and Andre are out together two nights in a row.  No Freddy.  No Jaime.

The group that gathered at the Wyndham, Aruba Grand and the Radisson in the evening on 05/30 were all questioned and there are some interesting statements made. 



Andre played in the casino two nights in a row and his father was present.  Andre seemed to have been left in the dark as far as Joran and Guido leaving the Wyndham.  Andre says they left and went to Joran's house to get some money so they could play a live game.  (Joran does not mention the part about going to his house to get money to play a live game in his statement)  After he joins them at the Radisson he watches Joran and Guido play for a long time until Deepak arrives.  Then he says Joran, Guido and Deepak all leave, yet he stays. He said he had been 'watching' the others play, so what was he doing as he stayed behind while the others left?  About an hour later they are back, Guido with a silver $100 chip and Joran is again playing poker.  After Joran finishes playing poker, Deepak and Joran leave to go to another casino.  Andre says he and Guido go home.  No mention of Andre's father and why Andre did not leave with him.

http://scaredmonkeys.net/index.php?topic=310.0



Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #787 12/24/08 -
Post by: johan555 on December 24, 2008, 12:14:15 PM
(http://i272.photobucket.com/albums/jj176/bastibro/Laos/Joranneke_0004-2-1-1.jpg)

I think the guy next to Urine is for a 95% Luke and the third who was with them than would be this teacher moron.

Bastibro was that pic on a "waar ben je nu page " ?


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #787 12/24/08 -
Post by: bastibro on December 24, 2008, 12:16:40 PM
(http://i272.photobucket.com/albums/jj176/bastibro/Laos/Joranneke_0004-2-1-1.jpg)

I think the guy next to Urine is for a 95% Luke and the third who was with them than would be this teacher moron.

Bastibro was that pic on a "waar ben je nu page " ?

Nee, er staat een artikel in de prive van deze week.
Niet kopen hOOr want er staat verder niets interessants in  ::MonkeyHaHa::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #787 12/24/08 -
Post by: johan555 on December 24, 2008, 12:17:49 PM
(http://i272.photobucket.com/albums/jj176/bastibro/Laos/Joranneke_0004-2-1-1.jpg)

I think the guy next to Urine is for a 95% Luke and the third who was with them than would be this teacher moron.

Bastibro was that pic on a "waar ben je nu page " ?

Nee, er staat een artikel in de prive van deze week.
Niet kopen hOOr want er staat verder niets interessants in  ::MonkeyHaHa::

staat aleen deze foto er in dan ?


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #787 12/24/08 -
Post by: bastibro on December 24, 2008, 12:24:06 PM
en deze . .

(http://i272.photobucket.com/albums/jj176/bastibro/Laos/Joranneke_0002-1-1-1-1-1.jpg)


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #787 12/24/08 -
Post by: bastibro on December 24, 2008, 12:26:26 PM
Zelfs in Juni, ten tijde van het Greta intervieuw, verbleef hij al in Laos.
Dat blijkt ook uit de berichten op `waar ben je nu`.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #787 12/24/08 -
Post by: Keepthefaith on December 24, 2008, 12:50:52 PM
MERRY CHRISTMAS TO ALL MONKEY'S ::MonkeyDance::

WE'RE HEADING INTO 2009 AND JUSTICE FOR NATALEE WILL CONTINUE ARUBA!!



      TAKE NOTICE..............................


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #787 12/24/08 -
Post by: Tamikosmom on December 24, 2008, 12:59:40 PM
Joran claims that he had no intention of going to Carlos and Charlies until the Mountain Brook Students encouraged him to come.  However Jaime Carrasquilla's words in his statement imply otherwise.  Was there a previously conceived plan in the works that would involved a pretty Mountain Brook student who had yet to be targeted ... a pretty Mountain Brook student who was leaving Aruba the next morning ...

Janet

+++++++

JAIME CARRASQUILLA

Joran suspect declaration of June 9, 2005 implies that he called Jaime Carrasquilla at approximately 11:00 PM on the evening of May 29, 2005 after his encounter with Natalee and her friends at the Black Jack table.

Joran Van der Sloot
Suspect Statement
June 9, 2005


I did not make an agreement with the girl as to how late I would meet them at Carlos & Charlies. After that I walked outside through the casino and when I got outside I called my father from my mobile phone which has the number "REMOVED" on the mobile phone of my mother. My mother has a mobile phone with the number "REMOVED". I called my father on that phone because my mother was outside of the country and my father had her phone in his possession. When I called my father it was approximately 23.00 hours. I told my father that I was ready and if he could come and pick me up at "Mc Donalds". After that I had called my friend "Jaime CARASQUILLA" on his mobile phone.


However ... Jaime Carrasquilla's witness statement of June 17, 2005 implies Joran contacted him between 4:00 PM and 7:00 PM on May 29, 2005 in regards to meeting him at Carlos 'N Charlies as the "American girls" would be there - prior to the encounter at the Black Jack table.

Jaime Carrasquilla
Witness Statement
June 17, 2005


On May 29th 2005, between the hours of 16.00 and 19.00, I was called by Joran on my mobile phone with the phone number .

Joran had asked me whether I wanted to go out with him that night. He told me that a few American girls would go to "Carlos & Charlies" and whether I wanted to meet up with him there


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #787 12/24/08 -
Post by: bastibro on December 24, 2008, 01:07:41 PM
MERRY CHRISTMAS TO ALL MONKEY'S ::MonkeyDance::

WE'RE HEADING INTO 2009 AND JUSTICE FOR NATALEE WILL CONTINUE ARUBA!!



      TAKE NOTICE..............................

AMEN!

I want to wish all Monkeys a very happy Christmas, let`s all celebrate the birth of our Lord and Savior Jesus Christ!

(http://www.vragenoverkerst.nl/uploads/yD/Pb/yDPbbwzBxPBPyltDONVoew/kerstmis-heilige-nacht.jpg)





Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #787 12/24/08 -
Post by: truthseeker2 on December 24, 2008, 01:20:52 PM
Joran claims that he had no intention of going to Carlos and Charlies until the Mountain Brook Students encouraged him to come.  However Jaime Carrasquilla's words in his statement imply otherwise.  Was there a previously conceived plan in the works that would involved a pretty Mountain Brook student who had yet to be targeted ... a pretty Mountain Brook student who was leaving Aruba the next morning ...

Janet

+++++++

JAIME CARRASQUILLA

Joran suspect declaration of June 9, 2005 implies that he called Jaime Carrasquilla at approximately 11:00 PM on the evening of May 29, 2005 after his encounter with Natalee and her friends at the Black Jack table.

Joran Van der Sloot
Suspect Statement
June 9, 2005


I did not make an agreement with the girl as to how late I would meet them at Carlos & Charlies. After that I walked outside through the casino and when I got outside I called my father from my mobile phone which has the number "REMOVED" on the mobile phone of my mother. My mother has a mobile phone with the number "REMOVED". I called my father on that phone because my mother was outside of the country and my father had her phone in his possession. When I called my father it was approximately 23.00 hours. I told my father that I was ready and if he could come and pick me up at "Mc Donalds". After that I had called my friend "Jaime CARASQUILLA" on his mobile phone.


However ... Jaime Carrasquilla's witness statement of June 17, 2005 implies Joran contacted him between 4:00 PM and 7:00 PM on May 29, 2005 in regards to meeting him at Carlos 'N Charlies as the "American girls" would be there - prior to the encounter at the Black Jack table.

Jaime Carrasquilla
Witness Statement
June 17, 2005


On May 29th 2005, between the hours of 16.00 and 19.00, I was called by Joran on my mobile phone with the phone number .

Joran had asked me whether I wanted to go out with him that night. He told me that a few American girls would go to "Carlos & Charlies" and whether I wanted to meet up with him there


Jaime makes a trip over to the Wyndham around 11:00 pm on 05/30 to pick up his father, according to his statement.  Around that time Deepak is calling Joran for a second time that night and Joran and Guido leave the Wyndham Casino according to Andre Dos Santo.  Later they tell Andre they went to Joran's house to get money.  In Joran's statement of 06/14, he and Guido left to cash in chips from the Aruba Grand and they stay and play blackjack for a short time.

Did they actually go out to meet Jaime?  A lot of things were happening around 11:00 pm on 05/30.  Also, I believe Beth had arrived on the island just before 11:00 pm.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #787 12/24/08 -
Post by: sharon on December 24, 2008, 03:27:41 PM
Thanks, Janet  ::MonkeyHaHa::

I went off to get Jaime's statement which conflicted with Joran's re: the timing of the call, and got sidetracked.

That was always interesting to me - -the discrepancy in the timing of the call from Joran to Jaime. One would think something like that would be easily verifiable, no?

The other part of Joran's statement that has always stuck out -- is when he tells us that he called his mother's cell phone when he needed his father to give him a ride home from the casino  ::MonkeyConfused:: 

Of course, he also tells us that his father had his mother's cell phone in his possession because she was out of the country. Also easily verifiable, but how did Joran know this?

Pick up at the McDonald's. Was it 11 pm or 4 am? Maybe he really did call his mother.

Which cell phone was Paulus using to call Joran when Beth and Jug arrived? Had he switched back to his own cell phone?

Still so many questions. The answers shouldn't be difficult.

I will wait for them.

I'm with great monkey company.


AVOID ARUBA AS IF YOUR LIFE DEPENDS ON IT.....IT DOES!!!!

Justice for Natalee Holloway


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #787 12/24/08 -
Post by: Buckeye on December 24, 2008, 05:14:33 PM
I think he did call his mom.  Maybe dad was out of it, angry drunk or drugged.  Anita has island connections and has covered/fixed things for him before.  "My mother can lie"....


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #787 12/24/08 -
Post by: texasmom on December 24, 2008, 05:19:31 PM
I think he did call his mom.  Maybe dad was out of it, angry drunk or drugged.  Anita has island connections and has covered/fixed things for him before.  "My mother can lie"....

I agree Buckeye.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #787 12/24/08 -
Post by: bastibro on December 24, 2008, 07:10:04 PM
I think he did call his mom.  Maybe dad was out of it, angry drunk or drugged.  Anita has island connections and has covered/fixed things for him before.  "My mother can lie"....

I agree Buckeye.

I don`t agree.  I think Anita is totally unaware of all that happened that night at least until march 2008.
My opinion is based on all the interviews that i`ve seen . . English and Dutch


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #787 12/24/08 -
Post by: Nut44x4 on December 24, 2008, 07:20:00 PM
Merry Christmas to all of Natalee's family and friends...
(http://bestsmileys.com/christmas2/4.gif) (http://bestsmileys.com/christmas2/3.gif)


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #787 12/24/08 -
Post by: Nut44x4 on December 24, 2008, 07:23:16 PM
Happy Holidays to all Monkeys and families (http://bestsmileys.com/christmas2/18.gif)


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #787 12/24/08 -
Post by: trimmonthelake on December 24, 2008, 07:56:08 PM
Merry Christmas to Natalee's family.
She will forever be in our hearts.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #787 12/24/08 -
Post by: JodyO on December 24, 2008, 08:32:52 PM
MERRY CHRISTMAS to all the Monkeys.

I happened to see this at Instapundit and thought it might be of interest here.




HOW’S THE ECONOMY? Reader Ross Zelman writes:

    If you want to get a picture of how bad the US & world economy are doing, ask your readers to describe their holiday travel abroad. I’m in Aruba right now (having a great family vacation). This is our seventh trip in eight years; we’ve been timeshare owners for half that time. We aren’t experts in any sense, but simple observation and inquiry shows that hotels are at less than 50%, hotel staff are reduced, planes are flying less frequently and at less than full occupancy, restaurant reservations are easy to come by and fellow travellers are looking at the empty lounge chairs next to them and all agreeing that things are even worst than in 2001. If optional travel is a leading indicator, the economy is going to retract faster than we even realized.

http://pajamasmedia.com/instapundit/64233/



So things are worse in Aruba than the Christmas after 9/11/01. I'm sure it has much to do with our economy being in the tank, but I'm certainly pleased to learn that Aruba is suffering greatly. 50% less tourists than usual. That has to hurt when your entire economy depends on tourism! Can't happen to a nicer bunch than the Arubans IMO.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #787 12/24/08 -
Post by: bastibro on December 24, 2008, 08:44:35 PM
MERRY CHRISTMAS to all the Monkeys.

I happened to see this at Instapundit and thought it might be of interest here.




HOW’S THE ECONOMY? Reader Ross Zelman writes:

    If you want to get a picture of how bad the US & world economy are doing, ask your readers to describe their holiday travel abroad. I’m in Aruba right now (having a great family vacation). This is our seventh trip in eight years; we’ve been timeshare owners for half that time. We aren’t experts in any sense, but simple observation and inquiry shows that hotels are at less than 50%, hotel staff are reduced, planes are flying less frequently and at less than full occupancy, restaurant reservations are easy to come by and fellow travellers are looking at the empty lounge chairs next to them and all agreeing that things are even worst than in 2001. If optional travel is a leading indicator, the economy is going to retract faster than we even realized.

http://pajamasmedia.com/instapundit/64233/



So things are worse in Aruba than the Christmas after 9/11/01. I'm sure it has much to do with our economy being in the tank, but I'm certainly pleased to learn that Aruba is suffering greatly. 50% less tourists than usual. That has to hurt when your entire economy depends on tourism! Can't happen to a nicer bunch than the Arubans IMO.

Yep, they have to learn to let Justice prevail on Corruptiuon first  ::MonkeyWink::
Great post, Thanks.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #787 12/24/08 -
Post by: San on December 24, 2008, 08:53:50 PM
(http://i34.photobucket.com/albums/d118/Sanddrops/MerryChristmasMonkeys5transp.gif)


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #787 12/24/08 -
Post by: texasmom on December 24, 2008, 09:17:23 PM
Pearl at BFN posted this:


http://www.blikopnieuws.nl/extern_bericht/378784


JORAN VAN DER SLOOT VIERT NU FEEST IN LAOS!
Joran van der Sloot heeft Thailand verruild voor het naburige Laos! Blijkbaar werd de Thaise grond toch te heet onder zijn voeten nadat misdaadverslaggever Peter R. de Vries hem voor de tweede maal in het geniep gefilmd had. Op die tweede opnamen met de verborgen camera suggereerde Joran dat hij Thaise vrouwen zou kunnen leveren voor de Nederlandse seksmarkt. Niet lang na de uitzending van De Vries besloot Joran Thailand te verruilen voor Laos, maar ook daar vermaakt Van der Sloot, nog altijd verdacht van betrokkenheid bij de verdwijning van de Amerikaanse tiener Natalee Holloway op Aruba, zich uitstekend zo vertellen Nederlandse rugzaktoeristen die Joran tegen het lijf liepen in Bucks Bar in het dorpje Vang Vieng in Laos! Aan vrouwenhandel zal Joran zich in Laos blijkbaar niet wagen getuige de tekst op zijn t-shirt…. Vraag blijft wel wie de wereldreis van Joran financiert!

Zie bron: ZIJonline

Google translation:

JORAN OF THE DAY NOW VIERT CONCLUDED IN LAOS!
Joran van der Sloot has exchanged Thailand for neighboring Laos! Apparently the Thai was still too hot ground under his feet after crime reporter Peter R. de Vries him for the second time in the quiet was filmed. On the second images with a hidden camera Joran suggested that he could make Thai women for the sex Dutch market. Not long after the broadcast of De Vries Joran Thailand decided to move out of Laos, but also entertained Van der Sloot, is still suspected of involvement in the disappearance of American teenager Natalee Holloway in Aruba, is excellent as telling Dutch backpacker tourists against Joran the bodyguard was in Bucks Bar in the village of Vang Vieng in Laos! On trafficking in Laos Joran will apparently not seen the text car at t-shirt .... Question remains of others whose finances Joran!

See source: ZIJonline


 


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #787 12/24/08 -
Post by: klaasend on December 24, 2008, 09:17:26 PM
Merry Christmas to All!


(http://i118.photobucket.com/albums/o100/klaasen3/Sub5/xmas08.gif)


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #787 12/24/08 -
Post by: texasmom on December 24, 2008, 09:27:25 PM
Beautiful tree Klaas!  Thank you and Merry Christmas to you and yours!


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #787 12/24/08 -
Post by: Buckeye on December 24, 2008, 10:36:22 PM
I think he did call his mom.  Maybe dad was out of it, angry drunk or drugged.  Anita has island connections and has covered/fixed things for him before.  "My mother can lie"....

I agree Buckeye.

I don`t agree.  I think Anita is totally unaware of all that happened that night at least until march 2008.
My opinion is based on all the interviews that i`ve seen . . English and Dutch

Supposedly, when Paulus called Anita, in the Netherlands, the "Holiday Inn Story" was the only one known.  Why do Paulus and Anita have issues because Joran was the last with Natalee??   He would not be the last if he and his friends dropped her off at her hotel.  What did Joran's parents know about the truth??

 
“Twee jaar geleden, in mei, werd mijn oma negentig jaar. Ik was in Nederland om haar verjaardag te vieren. Kort voor ik weer terug zou keren naar Aruba, belde mijn man Paul me op en vertelde dat op Aruba een meisje werd vermist. En hij zei erbij: ‘Schijnbaar is Joran de laatste geweest die met haar samen was.’ Er ging onmiddellijk van alles door mijn hoofd, allerlei gedachten streden om voorrang. Heel verwarrend vond ik het dat er ook dingen in me opkwamen als: Potverdorie, zondagavond is hij dus blijkbaar uit geweest. Wij wisten van niets, hij moest het huis uit zijn geslopen.”

Two years ago, in May, my grandmother became ninety year.  I was in the Netherlands her birthday to celebrate.  Short for I prevent back would turn to Aruba, rung my man Paul me on and told that on Aruba a girl was missed.  And he said with it:  'Seeming is Joran the last one been that with her together was.'  There immediately of everything through my head, all sorts of thoughts priorities fought went.  Quite confusingly found I it that it also compete in me came up as:  Potverdorie, Sunday evening is been he thus apparently out.  We knew had to be demolished by nothing, he it house out."
/i]

Posted June 8, 2007 at RU:

 the interview that Anita has given at Libelle a number soak ago


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #787 12/24/08 -
Post by: Bladerunner on December 24, 2008, 10:52:48 PM
That is one sweet tree!!! Merry Christmas to all monkeys across the land!


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #787 12/24/08 -
Post by: Artcolley on December 24, 2008, 11:24:39 PM


     MERRY CHRISTMAS MONKEYS!!!!!


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #787 12/24/08 -
Post by: MuffyBee on December 24, 2008, 11:29:05 PM
(http://bestsmileys.com/christmas1/9.gif)

To all the monkeys who have never forgotten Natalee.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #787 12/24/08 -
Post by: 2NJSons_Mom on December 24, 2008, 11:48:35 PM
Merry Christmas to All!


(http://i118.photobucket.com/albums/o100/klaasen3/Sub5/xmas08.gif)

Wow, I cannot top this, so I'm bringing it forward for all those praying for justice for Natalee.  May her family and friends know that we are still here, and will be here as long as it takes.

Happy Holidays to all.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #787 12/24/08 -
Post by: San on December 24, 2008, 11:58:13 PM


     MERRY CHRISTMAS MONKEYS!!!!!

Hi Art, Merry Christmas to you and your family.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #787 12/24/08 -
Post by: Keepthefaith on December 25, 2008, 12:08:32 AM
MERRY CHRISTMAS TO ALL THE MONKEY'S ::cartwheel::

I MAY NOT SAY IT ON A DAILY BASIS BUT WOULD LIKE TO EXTEND MY SINCERE GRATITUDE TO SCARED MONKEYS,AS WELL AS ALL THE MOD MONKEY'S FOR ALLOWING ME TO BE A PART OF SOMETHING SO SPECIAL!!

SCARED MONKEY'S GIVES A VOICE TO THOSE WHO NO LONGER HAVE A VOICE.

THE PURSUIT OF JUSTICE FOR NATALEE AS WELL AS ALL MISSING PERSONS WILL CONTINUE IN 2009............

BE AWARE!MONKEY'S ARE WATCHING FROM THE TREE ::MonkeyDance::

KEEPTHEFAITH


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #787 12/24/08 -
Post by: Keepthefaith on December 25, 2008, 12:14:29 AM
MONKEY'S ARE EVERYWHERE AROUND THE WORLD JORAN...YOU CAN RUN BUT YOU CAN'T HIDE  ::MonkeyDance:: PAULUS?I BET ANITA IS BUYING YOU MORE SHIRTS THIS CHRISTMAS SINCE YOU SEEM TO SWEAT A LOT.. ::cartwheel::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #787 12/24/08 -
Post by: 2NJSons_Mom on December 25, 2008, 12:27:58 AM
MONKEY'S ARE EVERYWHERE AROUND THE WORLD JORAN...YOU CAN RUN BUT YOU CAN'T HIDE  ::MonkeyDance:: PAULUS?I BET ANITA IS BUYING YOU MORE SHIRTS THIS CHRISTMAS SINCE YOU SEEM TO SWEAT A LOT.. ::cartwheel::

 ::MonkeyHaHa::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #787 12/24/08 -
Post by: cajun miracle on December 25, 2008, 12:59:56 AM
To all of you GREAT Monkeys, I would like to wish you a very MERRY CHRISTMAS!!!!!!!!!!! Thank you for your friendship and keeping Natalee in your thoughts and prayers.

God Bless,
Cajun Miracle


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #787 12/24/08 -
Post by: sharon on December 25, 2008, 07:19:43 AM
JOY TO THE WORLD.........

At least your corner of it  ::MonkeyTongue::


Many thanks to klaas and all the mods. It has been rough -- and you guys are by far 'the best'.

Red, Mrs Red and Dugga, too.

We are all unique individuals -- brought together to support a common goal.

JUSTICE FOR NATALEE HOLLOWAY

PEACE FOR HER FAMILY AND LOVED ONES


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #787 12/24/08 -
Post by: texasmom on December 25, 2008, 10:27:01 AM
JOY TO THE WORLD.........

At least your corner of it  ::MonkeyTongue::


Many thanks to klaas and all the mods. It has been rough -- and you guys are by far 'the best'.

Red, Mrs Red and Dugga, too.

We are all unique individuals -- brought together to support a common goal.

JUSTICE FOR NATALEE HOLLOWAY

PEACE FOR HER FAMILY AND LOVED ONES


Sharon said what I wanted to say so well, I'll just say....DITTO!!!!   ::MonkeyDance:: ::cartwheel:: ::MonkeyDance:: ::cartwheel:: ::MonkeyDance::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #787 12/24/08 -
Post by: Red on December 25, 2008, 10:32:10 AM
We wish everyone a very Merry Christmas!!!

(http://scaredmonkeys.com/fun-images/SMXmas2007_small_small.jpg)

http://scaredmonkeys.com/2008/12/25/merry-christmas-2008-from-scared-monkeys/

May the peace of the Lord come to this family who have suffered.

Thank you to all who have sacificed and given of themselves ...Merry Christmas.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #787 12/24/08 -
Post by: bastibro on December 25, 2008, 11:59:06 AM
I think he did call his mom.  Maybe dad was out of it, angry drunk or drugged.  Anita has island connections and has covered/fixed things for him before.  "My mother can lie"....

I agree Buckeye.

I don`t agree.  I think Anita is totally unaware of all that happened that night at least until march 2008.
My opinion is based on all the interviews that i`ve seen . . English and Dutch

Supposedly, when Paulus called Anita, in the Netherlands, the "Holiday Inn Story" was the only one known.  Why do Paulus and Anita have issues because Joran was the last with Natalee??   He would not be the last if he and his friends dropped her off at her hotel.  What did Joran's parents know about the truth??

 
“Twee jaar geleden, in mei, werd mijn oma negentig jaar. Ik was in Nederland om haar verjaardag te vieren. Kort voor ik weer terug zou keren naar Aruba, belde mijn man Paul me op en vertelde dat op Aruba een meisje werd vermist. En hij zei erbij: ‘Schijnbaar is Joran de laatste geweest die met haar samen was.’ Er ging onmiddellijk van alles door mijn hoofd, allerlei gedachten streden om voorrang. Heel verwarrend vond ik het dat er ook dingen in me opkwamen als: Potverdorie, zondagavond is hij dus blijkbaar uit geweest. Wij wisten van niets, hij moest het huis uit zijn geslopen.”

Two years ago, in May, my grandmother became ninety year.  I was in the Netherlands her birthday to celebrate.  Short for I prevent back would turn to Aruba, rung my man Paul me on and told that on Aruba a girl was missed.  And he said with it:  'Seeming is Joran the last one been that with her together was.'  There immediately of everything through my head, all sorts of thoughts priorities fought went.  Quite confusingly found I it that it also compete in me came up as:  Potverdorie, Sunday evening is been he thus apparently out.  We knew had to be demolished by nothing, he it house out."
/i]

Posted June 8, 2007 at RU:

 the interview that Anita has given at Libelle a number soak ago

Do you know whether the call from Paul was before or after Beth visited his home on the early morning of may 31?


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #787 12/24/08 -
Post by: Buckeye on December 25, 2008, 02:27:05 PM
I think he did call his mom.  Maybe dad was out of it, angry drunk or drugged.  Anita has island connections and has covered/fixed things for him before.  "My mother can lie"....

I agree Buckeye.

I don`t agree.  I think Anita is totally unaware of all that happened that night at least until march 2008.
My opinion is based on all the interviews that i`ve seen . . English and Dutch

Supposedly, when Paulus called Anita, in the Netherlands, the "Holiday Inn Story" was the only one known.  Why do Paulus and Anita have issues because Joran was the last with Natalee??   He would not be the last if he and his friends dropped her off at her hotel.  What did Joran's parents know about the truth??

 
“Twee jaar geleden, in mei, werd mijn oma negentig jaar. Ik was in Nederland om haar verjaardag te vieren. Kort voor ik weer terug zou keren naar Aruba, belde mijn man Paul me op en vertelde dat op Aruba een meisje werd vermist. En hij zei erbij: ‘Schijnbaar is Joran de laatste geweest die met haar samen was.’ Er ging onmiddellijk van alles door mijn hoofd, allerlei gedachten streden om voorrang. Heel verwarrend vond ik het dat er ook dingen in me opkwamen als: Potverdorie, zondagavond is hij dus blijkbaar uit geweest. Wij wisten van niets, hij moest het huis uit zijn geslopen.”

Two years ago, in May, my grandmother became ninety year.  I was in the Netherlands her birthday to celebrate.  Short for I prevent back would turn to Aruba, rung my man Paul me on and told that on Aruba a girl was missed.  And he said with it:  'Seeming is Joran the last one been that with her together was.'  There immediately of everything through my head, all sorts of thoughts priorities fought went.  Quite confusingly found I it that it also compete in me came up as:  Potverdorie, Sunday evening is been he thus apparently out.  We knew had to be demolished by nothing, he it house out."
/i]

Posted June 8, 2007 at RU:

 the interview that Anita has given at Libelle a number soak ago

Do you know whether the call from Paul was before or after Beth visited his home on the early morning of may 31?


I don't know but both of them stated they believed the Holiday Inn story until after Joran was arrested.  Sounds like Anita heard the real story while still in Holland.  I think Joran told her and she tried to make sure he was not "alone".  "There were adults there" (the Kalpoes IMO).


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #787 12/24/08 -
Post by: Anna on December 25, 2008, 02:39:47 PM
Anita returned to Aruba Wednesday evening.  Both she and Paulus knew it was Joran only who was last with Natalee before she returned.  That means they knew the HI story was a lie before Anita ever left The NL.

Just my opinion but based on what she said.  She also mentioned someone from her school calling her and her telling someone to tell Joran to stop talking.  This is contrary to both their claims of telling Joran to tell the truth, etc.

.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #787 12/24/08 -
Post by: Blue Moon on December 25, 2008, 05:07:47 PM
O.K. just got home from husbands family Christmas dinner. Brother in law says he and a friend are going to Aruba in Feb. I lost it and told him IF he did I would NEVER speak to him again.  He asked my husband if I was serious and he told him YES.  I told him it was dangerous for tourists, no laws, tourists getting robbed, rental cars being stolen.  My husband told him that is the place Natalee went missing.  BIL says oh they found out she was sold into slavery.  Lost it again with him. Told him come to my home I want to show him some facts he needs to know before he goes.   He told me b4 I left he was sorry if he upset me.  Told him I was dead serious and he has to come to my home so I can "educate" him.  So mad at him right now.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #787 12/24/08 -
Post by: Nut44x4 on December 25, 2008, 06:19:09 PM
MONKEY'S ARE EVERYWHERE AROUND THE WORLD JORAN...YOU CAN RUN BUT YOU CAN'T HIDE  ::MonkeyDance:: PAULUS?I BET ANITA IS BUYING YOU MORE SHIRTS THIS CHRISTMAS SINCE YOU SEEM TO SWEAT A LOT.. ::cartwheel::

This is funny  ::MonkeyLaugh::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #787 12/24/08 -
Post by: klaasend on December 25, 2008, 06:30:26 PM
http://www.24ora.com/

(http://i118.photobucket.com/albums/o100/klaasen3/Sub5/24ora122408.jpg)


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #787 12/24/08 -
Post by: texasmom on December 25, 2008, 07:59:19 PM
O.K. just got home from husbands family Christmas dinner. Brother in law says he and a friend are going to Aruba in Feb. I lost it and told him IF he did I would NEVER speak to him again.  He asked my husband if I was serious and he told him YES.  I told him it was dangerous for tourists, no laws, tourists getting robbed, rental cars being stolen.  My husband told him that is the place Natalee went missing.  BIL says oh they found out she was sold into slavery.  Lost it again with him. Told him come to my home I want to show him some facts he needs to know before he goes.   He told me b4 I left he was sorry if he upset me.  Told him I was dead serious and he has to come to my home so I can "educate" him.  So mad at him right now.

Good for you Blue Moon of KY! 

Not only do we not want anyone going there until there is Justice for Natalee; it's really not safe to go there right now.   ::MonkeyNoNo:: 


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #787 12/24/08 -
Post by: texasmom on December 26, 2008, 11:26:15 AM
http://www.associatedcontent.com/article/1224129/the_mysterious_disappearance_of_natalee.html?cat=17

11/26/2008

The Mysterious Disappearance of Natalee Holloway
Dead or Alive - Has a Crime Been Committed?

After Natalee Holloway disappeared on May 30, 2005, during a senior class trip on the island of Aruba, at least seven young men along with the father of one, Paul Van Der Sloot, were detained and/or arrested in connection with her disappearance. A judge in training, Paul Van der Sloot was soon released due to insufficient evidence. Two others, security guards Antonius "Mickey" John, 30, and Abraham Jones, 28, were released when the police said they had nothing to do with Holloway's disappearance. Steven Gregory Croes, 26, was released due to insufficient evidence. The other three, Joran van der Sloot, 17, and two Surinamese brothers, Satish Kalpoe, 18, and Deepak Kalpoe, 21, were also eventually released for the same reason.

Later, in May 2006, yet another young man, Guido Weaver, 18, and a casino worker and self-proclaimed friend of Joran Van der Sloot, was indicted for the murder of Natalee Holloway. A week later, Weaver was released - again for insufficient evidence to hold him. In November 2007, authorities re-arrested Van der Sloot and the Kalpoe brothers. This time they were charged with "involvement in the voluntary manslaughter of Natalee Holloway or causing serious bodily harm to Natalee Holloway, resulting in her death". Once more, all three were released due to insufficient evidence.

What is evident is that if you were a young man who was near where Holloway was last seen, it automatically made you a viable suspect and subject to being arrested or indicted with no evidence otherwise. Although this is a pursuable reason, it does become convoluted with each new rumor attributed as being fact even without actual corroboration. Each and every one of these men can be repeatedly arrested, only to be once more released for lack of evidence. In the meantime, how many more "suspects" will be identified while the Aruba police sift through their grab bag of possibilities?

After multiple arrests and even an attempt to be sued by Holloway's parents, Joran Van der Sloot has been the number one suspect. Dutch journalist Peter De Vries videotaped an interview with Van der Sloot on two different occasions where Van der Sloot made statements that he had help disposing of Holloway's body. The second interview, again set up by De Vries, shows Van der Sloot supposedly making arrangements to supply women for a sex industry. Nevertheless, the comments he has made has led many to believe he knows what happened to Natalee Holloway and he does admit to being one of the last to see her the night she went missing.

If the statements were provable that he was telling the truth about what happened or admitting he had anything to do with her alleged death and disappearance, it would give the Aruba officials and Holloway's family a legal stance to try and get a conviction. So far, there is no legal evidence that will hold up in court. It is more likely that Van der Sloot has a bigger problem with making up stories and embellishing them with each telling - depending on who his audience is. Whether or not these evolving tales will be proven true are still subject to debate; however, it does appear that Joran Van der Sloot has a problem keeping his mouth shut or he has a death wish of some kind. These statements have been categorized as being his "confession" for causing the death of Natalee Holloway; instead, they just seem to be an integral part of the imaginary world in which Van der Sloot resides.

Other witnesses have come forward claiming they saw these people with Natalee near a pond and near a landfill, yet investigation never turned up any evidence of Natalee or her body. Another witness has come forward two years later with yet another story of how Van der Sloot indicated he had done something to Holloway and then hid her body. Obviously, these so-called witnesses had no valid information to share and all appear to have been solely looking for their "fifteen minutes of fame". The problem has been that with all these witnesses and all the stories that have been put forward, there has not been a single statement that has generated a single real and verifiable clue as to what happened to Natalee Holloway.

Nonetheless, even if one of these men or any other person did admit to killing Natalee Holloway and also had disposed of her body in some manner, what are the chances of a conviction? Where is the physical evidence? There is no body and no evidence of a crime other than the fact that she is missing. There is no crime scene or forensic evidence connecting any person with her death. There is no evidence that she was sexually abused or is actually dead. No burial location has been found nor a single bone or piece of clothing. Until then, the disappearance of Natalee Holloway will remain a mystery. Without some evidence that points to any person being the cause of Holloway's disappearance, it is unlikely anyone will ever be convicted.


http://scaredmonkeys.net/index.php?topic=4239.900

Tim Miller: In my years of searching we have seen several bodies, skeletal remains--I have seen my own daughter's skeletal remains. I can’t help but believe at this moment that that is human remains in that crab trap.
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/23301056/page/4/
(http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3249/2345840954_e00aee9854_o.jpg)

snip


(http://img367.imageshack.us/img367/8683/image532fx0.jpg)
Kyle stated: "This is a picture from Natalee standing on the beach and rotated and scaled to the image to matching the body form inside the trap. It matches the end of the skirt identically to what was seen in the cage."

snip


Will we ever know for sure??????????   ::MonkeyNoNo::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #787 12/24/08 -
Post by: texasmom on December 26, 2008, 12:52:05 PM
Quote
Kyle: I took the proportions of the body form from the head, to shoulder, to a 90 degree angle which I believed to be the hem line of Natalee's skirt. I then took those proportions and matched them to the photo of Natalee with what she was last seen wearing. The proportions matched within an inch from head, to shoulder, to skirt line. Based on this comparison and with what we believed we saw in the Dec 29th video, Tim Miller contacted the family and told them the 99.9% comment. I told Tim not to do anything until we have forensic results back after the site is processed. Jan 7th we sampled the contents and in my opinion we found the skirt under the sand along with the other items The blue fabric was found right where the skirt is pictured. If it isn't her, it will forever haunt me as a major cosmic WTF.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #787 12/24/08 -
Post by: texasmom on December 26, 2008, 01:16:32 PM
 ::MonkeyEek:: ::MonkeyShocked::

http://www.24ora.com/content/view/6898/5/

(http://i21.photobucket.com/albums/b258/texasmom55/MiscNews3/1225200824ORAa.jpg)

Papiamentu translation

boa is bite one child tourist of 10 anja thursday, 25 december 2008 - 19:47 come across

diahuebs 25 of december ambulance is wordo dirigi for kapel of alto vista where supuestamente one boa will have to owing to bite one person in the vecindario ey. hour cu ambulance owing to jega at the sitio enberdad they owing to come encontra cu one child tourist cu tawata bezig cu one tour guide y for one motibo or another have to owing to bay march in the district cu consequencia cu one boa will have to owing to bite. personal of ambulance not owing to see importancia for transporta the child for hospital, but if owing to dune one injection for her not contagia his self cu ailment or bacteria. after of the tratamento the child owing to lever in the tour bus y owing to sigi disfruta of we sweet island. click read more for more imagen.



Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #787 12/24/08 -
Post by: bleachedblack on December 26, 2008, 01:29:57 PM
Mambo Jambo December 20th

(http://www.magic965.com/pictures/albums/DEC2008/201208%20MAMBO/Mambo_17.JPG)



December 24th Mambo Jambo

(http://www.magic965.com/pictures/albums/DEC2008/241208%20AFTER%20CURCH1/Mambo_13.JPG)


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #787 12/24/08 -
Post by: bleachedblack on December 26, 2008, 01:35:14 PM
::MonkeyEek:: ::MonkeyShocked::

http://www.24ora.com/content/view/6898/5/

(http://i21.photobucket.com/albums/b258/texasmom55/MiscNews3/1225200824ORAa.jpg)

Papiamentu translation

boa is bite one child tourist of 10 anja thursday, 25 december 2008 - 19:47 come across

diahuebs 25 of december ambulance is wordo dirigi for kapel of alto vista where supuestamente one boa will have to owing to bite one person in the vecindario ey. hour cu ambulance owing to jega at the sitio enberdad they owing to come encontra cu one child tourist cu tawata bezig cu one tour guide y for one motibo or another have to owing to bay march in the district cu consequencia cu one boa will have to owing to bite. personal of ambulance not owing to see importancia for transporta the child for hospital, but if owing to dune one injection for her not contagia his self cu ailment or bacteria. after of the tratamento the child owing to lever in the tour bus y owing to sigi disfruta of we sweet island. click read more for more imagen.



I also saw the article that posted the pic of the boa caught by Valero(?). Maybe all the rain this year has lead to a bumper crop of vipers......the kind without legs  ::MonkeyRoll::

(http://www.24ora.com/mambots/content/multithumb/thumbs/b.150.0.16777215.0..stories.news.2008.december2008.dec25.boachick.08122008002.jpg)

Boa ta ser captura den Valero
Thursday, 25 December 2008 - 19:03

http://www.24ora.com/content/view/6895/5/


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #787 12/24/08 -
Post by: Tamikosmom on December 26, 2008, 01:36:46 PM
http://www.associatedcontent.com/article/1224129/the_mysterious_disappearance_of_natalee.html?cat=17

11/26/2008

The Mysterious Disappearance of Natalee Holloway
Dead or Alive - Has a Crime Been Committed?

<snipped>

Nonetheless, even if one of these men or any other person did admit to killing Natalee Holloway and also had disposed of her body in some manner, what are the chances of a conviction? Where is the physical evidence? There is no body and no evidence of a crime other than the fact that she is missing. There is no crime scene or forensic evidence connecting any person with her death. There is no evidence that she was sexually abused or is actually dead. No burial location has been found nor a single bone or piece of clothing. Until then, the disappearance of Natalee Holloway will remain a mystery. Without some evidence that points to any person being the cause of Holloway's disappearance, it is unlikely anyone will ever be convicted.

<snipped>



Good Morning texasmom and ... thank you.

I hope you had a nice Christmas.


Since the discovery of the cage/trap and the recovery of the contents by ALE ... the issue has been a non-topic in the media.  I believe that immediate and ongoing distractions are the reasona.

Think about it.  Tim Miller and Dave Holloway were immediately sent on a goose-chase to Costa Rica regarding a "tip".  The crew of the Persistence where immediately sent to check the pond in regards to a "tip".  Then there were the Joran confessions and ... now the Rudy Croes focus on Jan Vander Straaten.

 ::MonkeyNoNo::

Kyle Kingman has the ability to expose the Persistence hoax and ... the John S./ALE connection.  Kyle has the ability to expose the self-serving motivations of John S.  Kyle has the ability to expose the scam that deceived those who sacrificially donated to the Persistence undertaking ... an undertaking that had nothing to do with justice for Natalee Holloway and ... a measure of closure for her family.

Janet

_______


KYLE KINGMAN'S POST - PRIVATE SITE

Kyle: We're being fed misinformation to keep us searching and out of their way while they cover their asses, destroy evidence, cover their tracks, and keep us out at sea and away from the trap.


Oceanexploration
Re: Natalee Case Discussion #776 11/19-08
« Reply #705 on: November 20, 2008, 11:22:14 PM »


Tim Miller was never on the Persistence while I was not on board.  He stepped off on or about the 1st of Jan to follow up on the false lead in Costa Rica IIRC.

http://scaredmonkeys.net/index.php?topic=4153.msg551304#msg551304


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #787 12/24/08 -
Post by: texasmom on December 26, 2008, 01:38:34 PM
Mambo Jambo December 20th

(http://www.magic965.com/pictures/albums/DEC2008/201208%20MAMBO/Mambo_17.JPG)



December 24th Mambo Jambo

(http://www.magic965.com/pictures/albums/DEC2008/241208%20AFTER%20CURCH1/Mambo_13.JPG)

How gross!  I saw that one of Steve (the tongue one...ewwwww), it must be a fad or something; I saw a pic of another DJ doing the same thing!
 ::MonkeyNoNo::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #787 12/24/08 -
Post by: texasmom on December 26, 2008, 01:58:26 PM
http://www.associatedcontent.com/article/1224129/the_mysterious_disappearance_of_natalee.html?cat=17

11/26/2008

The Mysterious Disappearance of Natalee Holloway
Dead or Alive - Has a Crime Been Committed?

<snipped>

Nonetheless, even if one of these men or any other person did admit to killing Natalee Holloway and also had disposed of her body in some manner, what are the chances of a conviction? Where is the physical evidence? There is no body and no evidence of a crime other than the fact that she is missing. There is no crime scene or forensic evidence connecting any person with her death. There is no evidence that she was sexually abused or is actually dead. No burial location has been found nor a single bone or piece of clothing. Until then, the disappearance of Natalee Holloway will remain a mystery. Without some evidence that points to any person being the cause of Holloway's disappearance, it is unlikely anyone will ever be convicted.

<snipped>



Good Morning texasmom and ... thank you.

I hope you had a nice Christmas.


Since the discovery of the cage/trap and the recovery of the contents by ALE ... the issue has been a non-topic in the media.  I believe that immediate and ongoing distractions are the reasona.

Think about it.  Tim Miller and Dave Holloway were immediately sent on a goose-chase to Costa Rica regarding a "tip".  The crew of the Persistence where immediately sent to check the pond in regards to a "tip".  Then there were the Joran confessions and ... now the Rudy Croes focus on Jan Vander Straaten.

 ::MonkeyNoNo::

Kyle Kingman has the ability to expose the Persistence hoax and ... the John S./ALE connection.  Kyle has the ability to expose the self-serving motivations of John S.  Kyle has the ability to expose the scam that deceived those who sacrificially donated to the Persistence undertaking ... an undertaking that had nothing to do with justice for Natalee Holloway and ... a measure of closure for her family.

Janet

_______


KYLE KINGMAN'S POST - PRIVATE SITE

Kyle: We're being fed misinformation to keep us searching and out of their way while they cover their asses, destroy evidence, cover their tracks, and keep us out at sea and away from the trap.


Oceanexploration
Re: Natalee Case Discussion #776 11/19-08
« Reply #705 on: November 20, 2008, 11:22:14 PM »


Tim Miller was never on the Persistence while I was not on board.  He stepped off on or about the 1st of Jan to follow up on the false lead in Costa Rica IIRC.

http://scaredmonkeys.net/index.php?topic=4153.msg551304#msg551304


Good afternoon Janet, and thank you!  I had a wonderful Christmas!  I hope you did too. 

However, the questions surrounding the information Kermit has provided were always on my mind.   ::MonkeyWaa::   

I have to wonder if you are right (the information so far says;yes), and Kyle has the ability to reveal information that would prove collusion by American "heroes" with an Aruban coverup to conceal the finding of the remains of precious Natalee; or if we are wrong (what don't we know) ????  I had so been hoping for some word from our fearless top banana Red to help me determine what to believe; but that has not come...so I have to wonder why that word hasn't come (either he hasn't been able to find out yet; or he can't post what he has found out)???? 

So many questions!!!!!   ::MonkeyConfused::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #787 12/24/08 -
Post by: San on December 26, 2008, 02:14:34 PM
Mambo Jambo December 20th

(http://www.magic965.com/pictures/albums/DEC2008/201208%20MAMBO/Mambo_17.JPG)



December 24th Mambo Jambo

(http://www.magic965.com/pictures/albums/DEC2008/241208%20AFTER%20CURCH1/Mambo_13.JPG)

How gross!  I saw that one of Steve (the tongue one...ewwwww), it must be a fad or something; I saw a pic of another DJ doing the same thing!
 ::MonkeyNoNo::

I was hoping his tongue would get caught and ripped out of his mouth.  He is so disgusting.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #787 12/24/08 -
Post by: 2NJSons_Mom on December 26, 2008, 02:15:16 PM
Mambo Jambo December 20th

(http://www.magic965.com/pictures/albums/DEC2008/201208%20MAMBO/Mambo_17.JPG)



December 24th Mambo Jambo

(http://www.magic965.com/pictures/albums/DEC2008/241208%20AFTER%20CURCH1/Mambo_13.JPG)

Do you think that is SC in the top pic with hair design & 4 days later in 2nd pic has regular hair?  I don't, but I guess it doesn't matter.... :puker:


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #787 12/24/08 -
Post by: Tamikosmom on December 26, 2008, 02:15:51 PM
http://www.associatedcontent.com/article/1224129/the_mysterious_disappearance_of_natalee.html?cat=17

11/26/2008

The Mysterious Disappearance of Natalee Holloway
Dead or Alive - Has a Crime Been Committed?

<snipped>

Nonetheless, even if one of these men or any other person did admit to killing Natalee Holloway and also had disposed of her body in some manner, what are the chances of a conviction? Where is the physical evidence? There is no body and no evidence of a crime other than the fact that she is missing. There is no crime scene or forensic evidence connecting any person with her death. There is no evidence that she was sexually abused or is actually dead. No burial location has been found nor a single bone or piece of clothing. Until then, the disappearance of Natalee Holloway will remain a mystery. Without some evidence that points to any person being the cause of Holloway's disappearance, it is unlikely anyone will ever be convicted.

<snipped>



Good Morning texasmom and ... thank you.

I hope you had a nice Christmas.


Since the discovery of the cage/trap and the recovery of the contents by ALE ... the issue has been a non-topic in the media.  I believe that immediate and ongoing distractions are the reasona.

Think about it.  Tim Miller and Dave Holloway were immediately sent on a goose-chase to Costa Rica regarding a "tip".  The crew of the Persistence where immediately sent to check the pond in regards to a "tip".  Then there were the Joran confessions and ... now the Rudy Croes focus on Jan Vander Straaten.

 ::MonkeyNoNo::

Kyle Kingman has the ability to expose the Persistence hoax and ... the John S./ALE connection.  Kyle has the ability to expose the self-serving motivations of John S.  Kyle has the ability to expose the scam that deceived those who sacrificially donated to the Persistence undertaking ... an undertaking that had nothing to do with justice for Natalee Holloway and ... a measure of closure for her family.

Janet

_______


KYLE KINGMAN'S POST - PRIVATE SITE

Kyle: We're being fed misinformation to keep us searching and out of their way while they cover their asses, destroy evidence, cover their tracks, and keep us out at sea and away from the trap.


Oceanexploration
Re: Natalee Case Discussion #776 11/19-08
« Reply #705 on: November 20, 2008, 11:22:14 PM »


Tim Miller was never on the Persistence while I was not on board.  He stepped off on or about the 1st of Jan to follow up on the false lead in Costa Rica IIRC.

http://scaredmonkeys.net/index.php?topic=4153.msg551304#msg551304


Was Maggie and CBB's concerns right on?  Was the search for the "Michelle" .... an Aruban  vessel that was in distress one of the diversions which Kyle Kingman's was referring to ... the diversions to keep the crew of the Persistence away from the cage/trap which may have held Natalee Holloway's remains?

Kyle Kingman does not think so but ... when you consider ... the pond tip ... the Costa Rica tip ... the pond witnesses ... Joran confessions ... the investigation of Jan Vander Straaten by Rudy Croes ...

 ::MonkeyNoNo::

Janet

_______


God bless you all!

Please be careful. Trusting the Aruban government can prove fatal. I find it interesting that the Aruban Port Authority would contact you at 2100, 9pm, about a missing boat. Had they no one else to send for rescue? 9pm? Then they send you a different set of coordinates? I know you have to do the right thing and pursue the lost boat, but I think you might have been in an area searching where they didn't want you to be or they just wanted to cost you a night's work. I also worry they might try to harm the Persistance. I sincerely hope I am wrong but felt the need to tell you my concerns.



I share the same concerns as Maggie! I can't help but worry that the ship was in the vacinity where Natalee could be found when the call came in. Obviously, the perpetrators of Natalee's demise had help from authorities and someone knows where she was disposed. The ship may have been too close for comfort.

Take care and God Bless you for all you are doing! You remain in my thoughts and prayers every day!



This wasn't part of any conspiracy or diversion. The Michelle was in distress. They likely lost their mast in which case they would lose GPS positioning.  By the time they realised they were in trouble they got disoriented and didn't know where they were.  Those seas were very rough. The night can be extremely disorienting especially with clouds on the horizon, no power, and bouncing around inside of a derilict boat.  It's courtesy to respond to distress calls when you're in the vicinity.
 
The Persistence is always in the vicinity where Natalee could be found.  This is why we're searching.  IMO The Aruban authorities have done nothing but help in anyway they can.
As for costing a nights work... the night was too rough to search and we would have turned towards the dock shortly anyhow.



Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #787 12/24/08 -
Post by: texasmom on December 26, 2008, 02:24:57 PM
Mambo Jambo December 20th

(http://www.magic965.com/pictures/albums/DEC2008/201208%20MAMBO/Mambo_17.JPG)



December 24th Mambo Jambo

(http://www.magic965.com/pictures/albums/DEC2008/241208%20AFTER%20CURCH1/Mambo_13.JPG)

How gross!  I saw that one of Steve (the tongue one...ewwwww), it must be a fad or something; I saw a pic of another DJ doing the same thing!
 ::MonkeyNoNo::

I was hoping his tongue would get caught and ripped out of his mouth.  He is so disgusting.

I wish it would too San!  I have a pic or two where he is making other gestures with his tongue that I didn't post because I had no doubt what the gestures were replicating!  He knew his picture was being taken, and intentionally posed that way!  He is a disgusting POS, and eventually he will stick his tongue in the wrong place and it will either get ripped out or rot off!

 ::MonkeyNoNo::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #787 12/24/08 -
Post by: texasmom on December 26, 2008, 02:26:34 PM
::MonkeyEek:: ::MonkeyShocked::

http://www.24ora.com/content/view/6898/5/

(http://i21.photobucket.com/albums/b258/texasmom55/MiscNews3/1225200824ORAa.jpg)

Papiamentu translation

boa is bite one child tourist of 10 anja thursday, 25 december 2008 - 19:47 come across

diahuebs 25 of december ambulance is wordo dirigi for kapel of alto vista where supuestamente one boa will have to owing to bite one person in the vecindario ey. hour cu ambulance owing to jega at the sitio enberdad they owing to come encontra cu one child tourist cu tawata bezig cu one tour guide y for one motibo or another have to owing to bay march in the district cu consequencia cu one boa will have to owing to bite. personal of ambulance not owing to see importancia for transporta the child for hospital, but if owing to dune one injection for her not contagia his self cu ailment or bacteria. after of the tratamento the child owing to lever in the tour bus y owing to sigi disfruta of we sweet island. click read more for more imagen.



I also saw the article that posted the pic of the boa caught by Valero(?). Maybe all the rain this year has lead to a bumper crop of vipers......the kind without legs  ::MonkeyRoll::

(http://www.24ora.com/mambots/content/multithumb/thumbs/b.150.0.16777215.0..stories.news.2008.december2008.dec25.boachick.08122008002.jpg)

Boa ta ser captura den Valero
Thursday, 25 December 2008 - 19:03

http://www.24ora.com/content/view/6895/5/

I think you're right bb, all the rain is driving the snakes out!  Forecast is rain all this week too!


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #787 12/24/08 -
Post by: texasmom on December 26, 2008, 02:31:56 PM
http://www.associatedcontent.com/article/1224129/the_mysterious_disappearance_of_natalee.html?cat=17

11/26/2008

The Mysterious Disappearance of Natalee Holloway
Dead or Alive - Has a Crime Been Committed?

<snipped>

Nonetheless, even if one of these men or any other person did admit to killing Natalee Holloway and also had disposed of her body in some manner, what are the chances of a conviction? Where is the physical evidence? There is no body and no evidence of a crime other than the fact that she is missing. There is no crime scene or forensic evidence connecting any person with her death. There is no evidence that she was sexually abused or is actually dead. No burial location has been found nor a single bone or piece of clothing. Until then, the disappearance of Natalee Holloway will remain a mystery. Without some evidence that points to any person being the cause of Holloway's disappearance, it is unlikely anyone will ever be convicted.

<snipped>



Good Morning texasmom and ... thank you.

I hope you had a nice Christmas.


Since the discovery of the cage/trap and the recovery of the contents by ALE ... the issue has been a non-topic in the media.  I believe that immediate and ongoing distractions are the reasona.

Think about it.  Tim Miller and Dave Holloway were immediately sent on a goose-chase to Costa Rica regarding a "tip".  The crew of the Persistence where immediately sent to check the pond in regards to a "tip".  Then there were the Joran confessions and ... now the Rudy Croes focus on Jan Vander Straaten.

 ::MonkeyNoNo::

Kyle Kingman has the ability to expose the Persistence hoax and ... the John S./ALE connection.  Kyle has the ability to expose the self-serving motivations of John S.  Kyle has the ability to expose the scam that deceived those who sacrificially donated to the Persistence undertaking ... an undertaking that had nothing to do with justice for Natalee Holloway and ... a measure of closure for her family.

Janet

_______


KYLE KINGMAN'S POST - PRIVATE SITE

Kyle: We're being fed misinformation to keep us searching and out of their way while they cover their asses, destroy evidence, cover their tracks, and keep us out at sea and away from the trap.


Oceanexploration
Re: Natalee Case Discussion #776 11/19-08
« Reply #705 on: November 20, 2008, 11:22:14 PM »


Tim Miller was never on the Persistence while I was not on board.  He stepped off on or about the 1st of Jan to follow up on the false lead in Costa Rica IIRC.

http://scaredmonkeys.net/index.php?topic=4153.msg551304#msg551304


Was Maggie and CBB's concerns right on?  Was the search for the "Michelle" .... an Aruban  vessel that was in distress one of the diversions which Kyle Kingman's was referring to ... the diversions to keep the crew of the Persistence away from the cage/trap which may have held Natalee Holloway's remains?

Kyle Kingman does not think so but ... when you consider ... the pond tip ... the Costa Rica tip ... the pond witnesses ... Joran confessions ... the investigation of Jan Vander Straaten by Rudy Croes ...

 ::MonkeyNoNo::

Janet

_______


God bless you all!

Please be careful. Trusting the Aruban government can prove fatal. I find it interesting that the Aruban Port Authority would contact you at 2100, 9pm, about a missing boat. Had they no one else to send for rescue? 9pm? Then they send you a different set of coordinates? I know you have to do the right thing and pursue the lost boat, but I think you might have been in an area searching where they didn't want you to be or they just wanted to cost you a night's work. I also worry they might try to harm the Persistance. I sincerely hope I am wrong but felt the need to tell you my concerns.



I share the same concerns as Maggie! I can't help but worry that the ship was in the vacinity where Natalee could be found when the call came in. Obviously, the perpetrators of Natalee's demise had help from authorities and someone knows where she was disposed. The ship may have been too close for comfort.

Take care and God Bless you for all you are doing! You remain in my thoughts and prayers every day!



This wasn't part of any conspiracy or diversion. The Michelle was in distress. They likely lost their mast in which case they would lose GPS positioning.  By the time they realised they were in trouble they got disoriented and didn't know where they were.  Those seas were very rough. The night can be extremely disorienting especially with clouds on the horizon, no power, and bouncing around inside of a derilict boat.  It's courtesy to respond to distress calls when you're in the vicinity.
 
The Persistence is always in the vicinity where Natalee could be found.  This is why we're searching.  IMO The Aruban authorities have done nothing but help in anyway they can.
As for costing a nights work... the night was too rough to search and we would have turned towards the dock shortly anyhow.


That has always been suspicious to me too! 


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #787 12/24/08 -
Post by: Tamikosmom on December 26, 2008, 02:56:04 PM

Was Maggie and CBB's concerns right on?  Was the search for the "Michelle" .... an Aruban  vessel that was in distress one of the diversions which Kyle Kingman's was referring to ... the diversions to keep the crew of the Persistence away from the cage/trap which may have held Natalee Holloway's remains?

Kyle Kingman does not think so but ... when you consider ... the pond tip ... the Costa Rica tip ... the pond witnesses ... Joran confessions ... the investigation of Jan Vander Straaten by Rudy Croes ...

 ::MonkeyNoNo::

Janet

_______


MAGGIE

God bless you all!

Please be careful. Trusting the Aruban government can prove fatal. I find it interesting that the Aruban Port Authority would contact you at 2100, 9pm, about a missing boat. Had they no one else to send for rescue? 9pm? Then they send you a different set of coordinates? I know you have to do the right thing and pursue the lost boat, but I think you might have been in an area searching where they didn't want you to be or they just wanted to cost you a night's work. I also worry they might try to harm the Persistance. I sincerely hope I am wrong but felt the need to tell you my concerns.


CBB

I share the same concerns as Maggie! I can't help but worry that the ship was in the vacinity where Natalee could be found when the call came in. Obviously, the perpetrators of Natalee's demise had help from authorities and someone knows where she was disposed. The ship may have been too close for comfort.

Take care and God Bless you for all you are doing! You remain in my thoughts and prayers every day!


KYLE KINGMAN

This wasn't part of any conspiracy or diversion. The Michelle was in distress. They likely lost their mast in which case they would lose GPS positioning.  By the time they realised they were in trouble they got disoriented and didn't know where they were.  Those seas were very rough. The night can be extremely disorienting especially with clouds on the horizon, no power, and bouncing around inside of a derilict boat.  It's courtesy to respond to distress calls when you're in the vicinity.
 
The Persistence is always in the vicinity where Natalee could be found.  This is why we're searching.  IMO The Aruban authorities have done nothing but help in anyway they can.
As for costing a nights work... the night was too rough to search and we would have turned towards the dock shortly anyhow.



That has always been suspicious to me too! 
 

Even more suspicious when you consider Kyle Kingman's words posted on a private site sometime in the months following.  It was almost as though he was through covering for John S./ALE conspiracy.  I wish his concerns had been shared with the FBI and/or Natalee Holloway's family.

Janet

++++++


KYLE KINGMAN'S POST - PRIVATE SITE

Kyle: We're being fed misinformation to keep us searching and out of their way while they cover their asses, destroy evidence, cover their tracks, and keep us out at sea and away from the trap.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #787 12/24/08 -
Post by: Keepthefaith on December 26, 2008, 03:03:33 PM
Hope all you Monkey's had a wonderful Christmas.. ::MonkeyDance::

I agree with Janet at this point in time.Also.Remember Red said things are going on behind the scenes,as well as Rob has contact with Tj Ward.We'll have to await their word!Let's get back to The Persistence.Where are John Silvetti,Tim Trahan,as well as Schaeffer and everyone else that was involved on the 7th of Jan??


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #787 12/24/08 -
Post by: truthseeker2 on December 26, 2008, 03:27:37 PM
Mambo Jambo December 20th

(http://www.magic965.com/pictures/albums/DEC2008/201208%20MAMBO/Mambo_17.JPG)



December 24th Mambo Jambo

(http://www.magic965.com/pictures/albums/DEC2008/241208%20AFTER%20CURCH1/Mambo_13.JPG)

Do you think that is SC in the top pic with hair design & 4 days later in 2nd pic has regular hair?  I don't, but I guess it doesn't matter.... :puker:

Either the dates are wrong, or we have two different DeeJays here.

Thanks, 2NJSons_Mom !


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #787 12/24/08 -
Post by: Tamikosmom on December 26, 2008, 03:28:37 PM
Hope all you Monkey's had a wonderful Christmas.. ::MonkeyDance::

I agree with Janet at this point in time.Also.Remember Red said things are going on behind the scenes,as well as Rob has contact with Tj Ward.We'll have to await their word!Let's get back to The Persistence.Where are John Silvetti,Tim Trahan,as well as Schaeffer and everyone else that was involved on the 7th of Jan??

I had a great Christmas but soooo glad it is all over.  I thrive on routine ... structure.  I find the Christmas season ... for the most part ... so overwhelming at times.  Although ... hubby and I are going to venture out to do some visiting this afternoon ... the peace and quiet of the morning has been appreciated.

Keepthefaith ... I hope that your Christmas went well.

When Kyle Kingman's words posted at another site are considered ... I do not think the topic of the cage/trap should lose focus until the contents the ALE retrieved without a challenge by John S. are revealed.  The family may be working behind the scenes but ... the posts of Monkeys have meaning as well.  Scared Monkeys' forums are open ... open for ALL to read.  It only takes one person who has the ability to make a significant difference ....

Janet
12:30 PM PT



Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #787 12/24/08 -
Post by: Keepthefaith on December 26, 2008, 03:35:39 PM
Hope all you Monkey's had a wonderful Christmas.. ::MonkeyDance::

I agree with Janet at this point in time.Also.Remember Red said things are going on behind the scenes,as well as Rob has contact with Tj Ward.We'll have to await their word!Let's get back to The Persistence.Where are John Silvetti,Tim Trahan,as well as Schaeffer and everyone else that was involved on the 7th of Jan??

I had a great Christmas but soooo glad it is all over.  I thrive on routine ... structure.  I find the Christmas season ... for the most part ... so overwhelming at times.  Although ... hubby and I are going to venture out to do some visiting this afternoon ... the peace and quiet of the morning has been appreciated.

Keepthefaith ... I hope that your Christmas went well.

When Kyle Kingman's words posted at another site are considered ... I do not think the topic of the cage/trap should lose focus until the contents the ALE retrieved without a challenge by John S. are revealed.  The family may be working behind the scenes but ... the posts of Monkeys have meaning as well.  Scared Monkeys' forums are open ... open for ALL to read.  It only takes one person who has the ability to make a significant difference ....

Janet
12:30 PM PT



I pray for Kyle.To live with his knowledge with his daughter being named Natalee will be an ever present reminder of the ability to do right or wrong!"If" he has faith.He knows what the right choice is! ::MonkeyCool::

Glad you had a wonderful Christmas Janet.Down here in the Seattle area it was a little difficult traffic wise but,one can't complain with a white Christmas..


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #787 12/24/08 -
Post by: texasmom on December 26, 2008, 03:59:32 PM

Was Maggie and CBB's concerns right on?  Was the search for the "Michelle" .... an Aruban  vessel that was in distress one of the diversions which Kyle Kingman's was referring to ... the diversions to keep the crew of the Persistence away from the cage/trap which may have held Natalee Holloway's remains?

Kyle Kingman does not think so but ... when you consider ... the pond tip ... the Costa Rica tip ... the pond witnesses ... Joran confessions ... the investigation of Jan Vander Straaten by Rudy Croes ...

 ::MonkeyNoNo::

Janet

_______


MAGGIE

God bless you all!

Please be careful. Trusting the Aruban government can prove fatal. I find it interesting that the Aruban Port Authority would contact you at 2100, 9pm, about a missing boat. Had they no one else to send for rescue? 9pm? Then they send you a different set of coordinates? I know you have to do the right thing and pursue the lost boat, but I think you might have been in an area searching where they didn't want you to be or they just wanted to cost you a night's work. I also worry they might try to harm the Persistance. I sincerely hope I am wrong but felt the need to tell you my concerns.


CBB

I share the same concerns as Maggie! I can't help but worry that the ship was in the vacinity where Natalee could be found when the call came in. Obviously, the perpetrators of Natalee's demise had help from authorities and someone knows where she was disposed. The ship may have been too close for comfort.

Take care and God Bless you for all you are doing! You remain in my thoughts and prayers every day!


KYLE KINGMAN

This wasn't part of any conspiracy or diversion. The Michelle was in distress. They likely lost their mast in which case they would lose GPS positioning.  By the time they realised they were in trouble they got disoriented and didn't know where they were.  Those seas were very rough. The night can be extremely disorienting especially with clouds on the horizon, no power, and bouncing around inside of a derilict boat.  It's courtesy to respond to distress calls when you're in the vicinity.
 
The Persistence is always in the vicinity where Natalee could be found.  This is why we're searching.  IMO The Aruban authorities have done nothing but help in anyway they can.
As for costing a nights work... the night was too rough to search and we would have turned towards the dock shortly anyhow.



That has always been suspicious to me too! 
 

Even more suspicious when you consider Kyle Kingman's words posted on a private site sometime in the months following.  It was almost as though he was through covering for John S./ALE conspiracy.  I wish his concerns had been shared with the FBI and/or Natalee Holloway's family.

Janet

++++++


KYLE KINGMAN'S POST - PRIVATE SITE

Kyle: We're being fed misinformation to keep us searching and out of their way while they cover their asses, destroy evidence, cover their tracks, and keep us out at sea and away from the trap.


I agree Janet.   ::MonkeyNoNo::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #787 12/24/08 -
Post by: Tamikosmom on December 26, 2008, 04:05:32 PM
Hope all you Monkey's had a wonderful Christmas.. ::MonkeyDance::

I agree with Janet at this point in time.Also.Remember Red said things are going on behind the scenes,as well as Rob has contact with Tj Ward.We'll have to await their word!Let's get back to The Persistence.Where are John Silvetti,Tim Trahan,as well as Schaeffer and everyone else that was involved on the 7th of Jan??

I had a great Christmas but soooo glad it is all over.  I thrive on routine ... structure.  I find the Christmas season ... for the most part ... so overwhelming at times.  Although ... hubby and I are going to venture out to do some visiting this afternoon ... the peace and quiet of the morning has been appreciated.

Keepthefaith ... I hope that your Christmas went well.

When Kyle Kingman's words posted at another site are considered ... I do not think the topic of the cage/trap should lose focus until the contents the ALE retrieved without a challenge by John S. are revealed.  The family may be working behind the scenes but ... the posts of Monkeys have meaning as well.  Scared Monkeys' forums are open ... open for ALL to read.  It only takes one person who has the ability to make a significant difference ....

Janet
12:30 PM PT



I pray for Kyle.To live with his knowledge with his daughter being named Natalee will be an ever present reminder of the ability to do right or wrong!"If" he has faith.He knows what the right choice is! ::MonkeyCool::

Glad you had a wonderful Christmas Janet.Down here in the Seattle area it was a little difficult traffic wise but,one can't complain with a white Christmas..

keepthefairth

I reside in the Fraser Valley of British Columbia ... just across the American border from you.  For the most part we share the same weather patterns.  However ... although there is close to two feet of snow in the Valley ... the main roads and freeways are been kept well ploughed and salted so ... commuting has not been a real problem although there have been a few serious incidences reported.

A friend of my daughter and SIL was killed just prior to Christmas in a vehicle accident on the  Coquihalla while ... returning home to the Valley with wife and four children (7-13) from a skiing trip at Manning Park.  Their van hit black ice.  Thankfully ... the rest of the family were uninjuried for the most part.

It has warmed a little today and ... melting has taken place so ... I hope temperatures do not return to those below freezing temperatures.  As we have a 4-wheel drive truck ... it is ice I detest more than snow when commuting.

My daughter and family made from the Eastern Fraser Valley for Christmas and ... son and famly made it from Vancouver Island and ... all have made it home safely.

However ... our church and most churches in the Fraser Valley did cancel Christmas Eve services.

Janet


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #787 12/24/08 -
Post by: texasmom on December 26, 2008, 04:14:32 PM
Mambo Jambo December 20th

(http://www.magic965.com/pictures/albums/DEC2008/201208%20MAMBO/Mambo_17.JPG)



December 24th Mambo Jambo

(http://www.magic965.com/pictures/albums/DEC2008/241208%20AFTER%20CURCH1/Mambo_13.JPG)

Do you think that is SC in the top pic with hair design & 4 days later in 2nd pic has regular hair?  I don't, but I guess it doesn't matter.... :puker:

If you look closely, (as disgusting as it is...) you can see the design in the front of his hair in the 24th pic.  His hair grows fast I guess (maybe kin to a whooly mammoth? lol), but I think both pics are POS Steve.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #787 12/24/08 -
Post by: truthseeker2 on December 26, 2008, 04:20:40 PM
I don't think his hair grew back that quickly.  Could be the actual date the pic was taken is not the 24th.  Or the one shown as the 20th could have been an earlier date.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #787 12/24/08 -
Post by: Tamikosmom on December 26, 2008, 04:30:35 PM
Have a nice afternoon texasmom and truthseeker2.

Janet
1:30 PM PT


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #787 12/24/08 -
Post by: truthseeker2 on December 26, 2008, 04:32:07 PM
Have a nice afternoon texasmom and truthseeker2.

Janet
1:30 PM PT

You, too, Janet.  I'm heading home from work.  Anxious to see how much traffic there is today!


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #787 12/24/08 -
Post by: klaasend on December 26, 2008, 04:47:20 PM
I'm going to cut everyone some slack since it is the holidays but....come 2009 let's try to be better:


(http://i118.photobucket.com/albums/o100/klaasen3/Sub5/Rules09.jpg)


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #787 12/24/08 -
Post by: bleachedblack on December 26, 2008, 05:21:23 PM
http://www.coolaruba.com/component/option,com_gallery2/Itemid,28/?g2_itemId=623306

http://www.coolaruba.com/component/option,com_gallery2/Itemid,28/?g2_itemId=623294


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #787 12/24/08 -
Post by: texasmom on December 26, 2008, 05:32:39 PM
Have a nice afternoon texasmom and truthseeker2.

Janet
1:30 PM PT

You too, Janet!


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #787 12/24/08 -
Post by: texasmom on December 26, 2008, 06:16:01 PM
 ::MonkeyShocked::

http://www.awe24.com/

DAMA TURISTA A HOGA NA MOMENTO CU EL A BAY DIVE

NAN A BAY DIVE CU E BOTO MI AMIGO



(http://www.awe24.com/sitebuildercontent/sitebuilderpictures/DEC_2008/24_dec_hogamento__2___Small_.JPG)


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #787 12/24/08 -
Post by: texasmom on December 26, 2008, 06:22:25 PM
::MonkeyShocked::

http://www.awe24.com/

DAMA TURISTA A HOGA NA MOMENTO CU EL A BAY DIVE

NAN A BAY DIVE CU E BOTO MI AMIGO



(http://www.awe24.com/sitebuildercontent/sitebuilderpictures/DEC_2008/24_dec_hogamento__2___Small_.JPG)


Dive Aruba has a boat called the Amigo.

(http://www.divearuba.com/newboat11.jpg)


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #787 12/24/08 -
Post by: texasmom on December 26, 2008, 06:26:57 PM
http://www.awe24.com/

Another pic from the site, and it does have Dive Aruba on the side.

(http://www.awe24.com/sitebuildercontent/sitebuilderpictures/DEC_2008/24_dec_hogamento__1___Small_.JPG)


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #787 12/24/08 -
Post by: 2NJSons_Mom on December 26, 2008, 06:42:15 PM
I don't think his hair grew back that quickly.  Could be the actual date the pic was taken is not the 24th.  Or the one shown as the 20th could have been an earlier date.

We agree, here, truthseeker2....maybe they were posted on those dates and not taken on those dates???...who knows.  My older son shaves his head, and it definitely doesn't grow back that much in 4 days.  DH hated it until his started to receed too much so he started to do the same...so I have two men here to base it on.  Anyway, it was an observation and I always appreciate BB's picture updates.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #787 12/24/08 -
Post by: bleachedblack on December 26, 2008, 06:47:31 PM
I read about the dive accident on an Aruba Bulletin board- not much info. but in looking at the pics, all I can say is I wouldn't want to count on any of the three guys on that boat to do CPR on me. Hell they don't look terribly upset-just throw the towel over her head- feet and fingers starting to show signs of cyanosis, wonder if they tried CPR? no police around ( would you think they would radio someone?). Maybe I am reading to much into the pics.....very sorry for the lady- looks like she is wearing an all inclusive band on her left wrist. ::MonkeyNoNo::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #787 12/24/08 -
Post by: klaasend on December 26, 2008, 07:36:37 PM
(http://img187.imageshack.us/img187/2973/4372131181737200767riu2io2.jpg)


Occupancy Rates Are Down 20 to 25 Percent For High-Season 2009


December 24th 2008, Aruba.

ORANJESTAD-CEO of Aruba Hotel And Tourism Association (AHATA), Rob
Smith is expecting difficult times for the island's tourism industry during 2009.
Based on the latest reservations, hotels are reporting occupancy rates ranging
between 65 and 67 percent for the high-season of 2009 that is between 20 to
25 percent down compared to the average high-season occupancy rate.

Smith calls the projected occupancy rate for the first quarter of 2009 grave.
Hotels on the island should have healthy occupancy rates of between 82 and
85 percent in the first quarter of the year to break even for the rest of the
year.

There is a noticeable trend in bookings in the past months. Visitors are now
booking their trip to Aruba an average of 21 days in advance. In the past
visitors reserved their trip to Aruba months ahead. The changing behaviour in
reservations may be attributed to uncertainty in personal finances and job
security, in addition to domestic and global economic outlook. Therefore it is
extremely hard to give a much accurate projection of the occupancy rate for
the high-season of 2009.

There is also good news, so far no additional hotels have announced lay-offs
of their employees to AHATA. Radisson Aruba Caribbean Resort & Casino has
decided to lay-off 40 employees on voluntary basis in the Fall of 2008 as a
result of low occupancy rate.

http://www.aruba-bb.com/viewtopic.php?f=11&t=66068


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #787 12/24/08 -
Post by: klaasend on December 26, 2008, 07:36:53 PM
I read about the dive accident on an Aruba Bulletin board- not much info. but in looking at the pics, all I can say is I wouldn't want to count on any of the three guys on that boat to do CPR on me. Hell they don't look terribly upset-just throw the towel over her head- feet and fingers starting to show signs of cyanosis, wonder if they tried CPR? no police around ( would you think they would radio someone?). Maybe I am reading to much into the pics.....very sorry for the lady- looks like she is wearing an all inclusive band on her left wrist. ::MonkeyNoNo::

(http://i118.photobucket.com/albums/o100/klaasen3/Sub5/diveaccident.jpg)


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #787 12/24/08 -
Post by: San on December 26, 2008, 08:04:42 PM
I read about the dive accident on an Aruba Bulletin board- not much info. but in looking at the pics, all I can say is I wouldn't want to count on any of the three guys on that boat to do CPR on me. Hell they don't look terribly upset-just throw the towel over her head- feet and fingers starting to show signs of cyanosis, wonder if they tried CPR? no police around ( would you think they would radio someone?). Maybe I am reading to much into the pics.....very sorry for the lady- looks like she is wearing an all inclusive band on her left wrist. ::MonkeyNoNo::

I agree Bleached.  They don't look upset at all.  I wonder if they even know CPR.  Geez this poor woman.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #787 12/24/08 -
Post by: truthseeker2 on December 26, 2008, 09:20:27 PM
I don't think his hair grew back that quickly.  Could be the actual date the pic was taken is not the 24th.  Or the one shown as the 20th could have been an earlier date.

We agree, here, truthseeker2....maybe they were posted on those dates and not taken on those dates???...who knows.  My older son shaves his head, and it definitely doesn't grow back that much in 4 days.  DH hated it until his started to receed too much so he started to do the same...so I have two men here to base it on.  Anyway, it was an observation and I always appreciate BB's picture updates.

I know what you mean.  My son shaved his head during his sophomore year of high school.  In June of his rising senior year I begged him to grow it out for his senior pics.  He did, but it took a while to even get a good stubble on his head.  BB always has interesting stuff posted.  The dates those pics were taken may be messed up.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #787 12/24/08 -
Post by: Blue Moon on December 26, 2008, 09:47:53 PM
I read about the dive accident on an Aruba Bulletin board- not much info. but in looking at the pics, all I can say is I wouldn't want to count on any of the three guys on that boat to do CPR on me. Hell they don't look terribly upset-just throw the towel over her head- feet and fingers starting to show signs of cyanosis, wonder if they tried CPR? no police around ( would you think they would radio someone?). Maybe I am reading to much into the pics.....very sorry for the lady- looks like she is wearing an all inclusive band on her left wrist. ::MonkeyNoNo::

(http://i118.photobucket.com/albums/o100/klaasen3/Sub5/diveaccident.jpg)

I am still waiting on my brother-in-law to show up so I can "educate him" on his planned trip to Aruba.  If he still goes then I can only say I tried and he is stubborn.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #787 12/24/08 -
Post by: Tamikosmom on December 26, 2008, 09:55:17 PM
I'm going to cut everyone some slack since it is the holidays but....come 2009 let's try to be better:


(http://i118.photobucket.com/albums/o100/klaasen3/Sub5/Rules09.jpg)

YOU TALKIN TO ME WILLIS!!

 ::MonkeyShocked::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #787 12/24/08 -
Post by: Tamikosmom on December 26, 2008, 10:12:11 PM
My New Year's Resolutions are the same as last year and ... the year before.

1.  No more off topic.
2.  No more striving to be afforded that edit icon.
3.  Be more compromising.
4.  Refrain from posting quotes.
5.  Two hour daily limit on the SM Site.
6.  Be nice to trolls.
7.  Never bother Klaas or mods to edit my typos.
8.  Encourage to Dana to invite Steve Cohen and Joe Tacopina back to his show.

 ::MonkeyTongue::

Janet


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #787 12/24/08 -
Post by: texasmom on December 26, 2008, 10:51:37 PM
I read about the dive accident on an Aruba Bulletin board- not much info. but in looking at the pics, all I can say is I wouldn't want to count on any of the three guys on that boat to do CPR on me. Hell they don't look terribly upset-just throw the towel over her head- feet and fingers starting to show signs of cyanosis, wonder if they tried CPR? no police around ( would you think they would radio someone?). Maybe I am reading to much into the pics.....very sorry for the lady- looks like she is wearing an all inclusive band on her left wrist. ::MonkeyNoNo::

I agree bb, I felt very sorry for the lady.   ::MonkeyNoNo::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #787 12/24/08 -
Post by: Nut44x4 on December 26, 2008, 10:52:52 PM
Janet, I would be honoured to fix your typos.  :2notworthy:


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #787 12/24/08 -
Post by: San on December 26, 2008, 10:59:45 PM
Janet, I would be honoured to fix your typos.  :2notworthy:

Typos what typos  ::MonkeyWink::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #787 12/24/08 -
Post by: Tamikosmom on December 26, 2008, 11:18:54 PM
Janet, I would be honoured to fix your typos.  :2notworthy:

Typos what typos  ::MonkeyWink::

San and Nut

Hugs!

Janet



Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #787 12/24/08 -
Post by: San on December 26, 2008, 11:21:44 PM
Janet, I would be honoured to fix your typos.  :2notworthy:

Typos what typos  ::MonkeyWink::

San and Nut

Hugs!

Janet



Have a good night Janet.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #787 12/24/08 -
Post by: texasmom on December 27, 2008, 12:03:40 AM
12/27/2008 Awe Mainta Pg 2

http://awemainta.com/home/

(http://i21.photobucket.com/albums/b258/texasmom55/Misc%20News%204/12272008AweMaintaPg2.jpg)

Papiamentu translation:

fiscal is confisca curpa of muher canades cu owing to die during diving

police of oranjestad, tuesday 11.15 of afternoon, is achieve informacion cu one tourist will owing to hoga. owing to resulta cu one are of tourist owing to bay dive y during this, the tourist helen antoinette buchmir, casa cu hussey, of 54 year, owing to become bad, y owing to tell the diveinstructeur for lever cune. hour cu past owing to arrive in boat, past owing to cay in another y owing to cay in sea. the was bleed for nose. ambulance owing to come n’e sitio y dune first help, but not can owing to haci mucho. for 12.15 dr. van der broek owing to constata dead of the victima. the curpa wordo take in beslag for more investigacion. informacion adicional cu we of awemainta owing to achieve is, cu one lady tourist here n’e instant cu past owing to bay dive, the was cu his 2 yiunan. they owing to bay scuba cu the boat my amigo, cu is opera for casonan so. till now is tell cu past owing to hoga, but autopsia will determina kico owing to cause his dead exactly, cu is motibo cu ministerio publico owing to let confisca the cadaver.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #787 12/24/08 -
Post by: texasmom on December 27, 2008, 01:55:53 AM
(http://i21.photobucket.com/albums/b258/texasmom55/CarpePicNatalee1.png)

Hoping and praying that the answers come soon! 
Justice for Natalee!


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #787 12/24/08 -
Post by: Edward on December 27, 2008, 11:41:54 AM
The world is a bigger nastier place then most can even understand.
The answers are not simple. So people better dig deeper in understanding to get to the bottom of WHY Natalee was disappeared. Why Paulus exists, untouched. Why Joran is such a lure, FREE,Untouched. Why the Dutch play the game of "Help" "Concern" Yet show passive resistance in doing ANYTHING of true value.
Natalee is far more then just a case of a girl who was gang raped and disposed of.
Good luck in 2009 in finding eye opening revelations. I doubt we will find the real answers without opening up Pandora's box. It is probably more info then most sit at home moms with bleeding hearts can comprehend. It is all relative in the end.
Natalee was a pawn in a very Big Game.
jmho


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #787 12/24/08 -
Post by: Tamikosmom on December 27, 2008, 12:21:33 PM
Good Morning johan and Magnolia.

Janet
9:20 AM PT


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #787 12/24/08 -
Post by: San on December 27, 2008, 01:55:13 PM
The world is a bigger nastier place then most can even understand.
The answers are not simple. So people better dig deeper in understanding to get to the bottom of WHY Natalee was disappeared. Why Paulus exists, untouched. Why Joran is such a lure, FREE,Untouched. Why the Dutch play the game of "Help" "Concern" Yet show passive resistance in doing ANYTHING of true value.
Natalee is far more then just a case of a girl who was gang raped and disposed of.
Good luck in 2009 in finding eye opening revelations. I doubt we will find the real answers without opening up Pandora's box. It is probably more info then most sit at home moms with bleeding hearts can comprehend. It is all relative in the end.
Natalee was a pawn in a very Big Game.
jmho

I agree.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #787 12/24/08 -
Post by: Tamikosmom on December 27, 2008, 01:59:16 PM
The world is a bigger nastier place then most can even understand.

The answers are not simple. So people better dig deeper in understanding to get to the bottom of WHY Natalee was disappeared. Why Paulus exists, untouched. Why Joran is such a lure, FREE,Untouched. Why the Dutch play the game of "Help" "Concern" Yet show passive resistance in doing ANYTHING of true value.

Natalee is far more then just a case of a girl who was gang raped and disposed of.
Good luck in 2009 in finding eye opening revelations. I doubt we will find the real answers without opening up Pandora's box. It is probably more info then most sit at home moms with bleeding hearts can comprehend. It is all relative in the end.
Natalee was a pawn in a very Big Game.jmho

 ::MonkeyShocked::

This "sit at home mom with a bleeding heart" as well as others do comprehend perfectly the far reaching domino effect if Joran or Paulus were to be held accountability for their participation in the the events of the morning of May 30, 2005.

This is the reason that I believe that justice for Natalee Holloway is never going to prevail in either an Aruba or Dutch courtroom.

Accountability will extent from Joran and Paulus to the sons of the elite .... to those within the Aruban/Dutch administration who played a role in the coverup ... to the paid-off witnesses ... to the judiciary ... to the owners of the establishments involved in Aruba's underground economy (drugs, alcohol, pornography, sex trade, gambling, money laundering) ...

Janet


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #787 12/24/08 -
Post by: Tamikosmom on December 27, 2008, 02:01:38 PM
Good Morning San and texasmom.

Janet
11:00 AM PT


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #787 12/24/08 -
Post by: San on December 27, 2008, 02:04:52 PM
Good Morning San and texasmom.

Janet
11:00 AM PT

Good Morning Tamikosmom.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #787 12/24/08 -
Post by: San on December 27, 2008, 02:09:57 PM
The world is a bigger nastier place then most can even understand.

The answers are not simple. So people better dig deeper in understanding to get to the bottom of WHY Natalee was disappeared. Why Paulus exists, untouched. Why Joran is such a lure, FREE,Untouched. Why the Dutch play the game of "Help" "Concern" Yet show passive resistance in doing ANYTHING of true value.

Natalee is far more then just a case of a girl who was gang raped and disposed of.
Good luck in 2009 in finding eye opening revelations. I doubt we will find the real answers without opening up Pandora's box. It is probably more info then most sit at home moms with bleeding hearts can comprehend. It is all relative in the end.
Natalee was a pawn in a very Big Game.jmho

 ::MonkeyShocked::

This "sit at home mom with a bleeding heart" as well as others do comprehend perfectly the far reaching domino effect if Joran or Paulus were to be held accountability for their participation in the the events of the morning of May 30, 2005.

This is the reason that I believe that justice for Natalee Holloway is never going to prevail in either an Aruba or Dutch courtroom.

Accountability will extent from Joran and Paulus to the sons of the elite .... to those within the Aruban/Dutch administration who played a role in the coverup ... to the paid-off witnesses ... to the judiciary ... to the owners of the establishments involved in Aruba's underground economy (drugs, alcohol, pornography, sex trade, gambling, money laundering) ...

Janet

I will take Justice anyway I can get it.  I have said this once so I will say it again.  It is time to start fighting dirty.  Aruba/Holland from day one has never fought a fair fight.  They caused the damage.  So now I say fight fire with fire and win at any cost.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #787 12/24/08 -
Post by: Magnolia on December 27, 2008, 02:24:31 PM
The world is a bigger nastier place then most can even understand.

The answers are not simple. So people better dig deeper in understanding to get to the bottom of WHY Natalee was disappeared. Why Paulus exists, untouched. Why Joran is such a lure, FREE,Untouched. Why the Dutch play the game of "Help" "Concern" Yet show passive resistance in doing ANYTHING of true value.

Natalee is far more then just a case of a girl who was gang raped and disposed of.
Good luck in 2009 in finding eye opening revelations. I doubt we will find the real answers without opening up Pandora's box. It is probably more info then most sit at home moms with bleeding hearts can comprehend. It is all relative in the end.
Natalee was a pawn in a very Big Game.jmho

 ::MonkeyShocked::

This "sit at home mom with a bleeding heart" as well as others do comprehend perfectly the far reaching domino effect if Joran or Paulus were to be held accountability for their participation in the the events of the morning of May 30, 2005.

This is the reason that I believe that justice for Natalee Holloway is never going to prevail in either an Aruba or Dutch courtroom.

Accountability will extent from Joran and Paulus to the sons of the elite .... to those within the Aruban/Dutch administration who played a role in the coverup ... to the paid-off witnesses ... to the judiciary ... to the owners of the establishments involved in Aruba's underground economy (drugs, alcohol, pornography, sex trade, gambling, money laundering) ...

Janet

I will take Justice anyway I can get it.  I have said this once so I will say it again.  It is time to start fighting dirty.  Aruba/Holland from day one has never fought a fair fight.  They caused the damage.  So now I say fight fire with fire and win at any cost.

I agree, San....but I don't know how to do that except hire a hit man and
I don't have a single hit man in my address book.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #787 12/24/08 -
Post by: San on December 27, 2008, 02:34:03 PM
The world is a bigger nastier place then most can even understand.

The answers are not simple. So people better dig deeper in understanding to get to the bottom of WHY Natalee was disappeared. Why Paulus exists, untouched. Why Joran is such a lure, FREE,Untouched. Why the Dutch play the game of "Help" "Concern" Yet show passive resistance in doing ANYTHING of true value.

Natalee is far more then just a case of a girl who was gang raped and disposed of.
Good luck in 2009 in finding eye opening revelations. I doubt we will find the real answers without opening up Pandora's box. It is probably more info then most sit at home moms with bleeding hearts can comprehend. It is all relative in the end.
Natalee was a pawn in a very Big Game.jmho

 ::MonkeyShocked::

This "sit at home mom with a bleeding heart" as well as others do comprehend perfectly the far reaching domino effect if Joran or Paulus were to be held accountability for their participation in the the events of the morning of May 30, 2005.

This is the reason that I believe that justice for Natalee Holloway is never going to prevail in either an Aruba or Dutch courtroom.

Accountability will extent from Joran and Paulus to the sons of the elite .... to those within the Aruban/Dutch administration who played a role in the coverup ... to the paid-off witnesses ... to the judiciary ... to the owners of the establishments involved in Aruba's underground economy (drugs, alcohol, pornography, sex trade, gambling, money laundering) ...

Janet

I will take Justice anyway I can get it.  I have said this once so I will say it again.  It is time to start fighting dirty.  Aruba/Holland from day one has never fought a fair fight.  They caused the damage.  So now I say fight fire with fire and win at any cost.

I agree, San....but I don't know how to do that except hire a hit man and
I don't have a single hit man in my address book.

Wait let me check to see if I have any in my address book.  ::MonkeyHaHa::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #787 12/24/08 -
Post by: San on December 27, 2008, 02:36:51 PM
Aruba had professional hitmen.  Some were law enforcement (Van der Straaten) and others were mafia (Posner).


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #787 12/24/08 -
Post by: San on December 27, 2008, 02:40:55 PM
So besides dealing with the corrupt Aruban hitmen we had to deal with the corrupt American Traitors.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #787 12/24/08 -
Post by: Keepthefaith on December 27, 2008, 02:41:21 PM
The world is a bigger nastier place then most can even understand.

The answers are not simple. So people better dig deeper in understanding to get to the bottom of WHY Natalee was disappeared. Why Paulus exists, untouched. Why Joran is such a lure, FREE,Untouched. Why the Dutch play the game of "Help" "Concern" Yet show passive resistance in doing ANYTHING of true value.

Natalee is far more then just a case of a girl who was gang raped and disposed of.
Good luck in 2009 in finding eye opening revelations. I doubt we will find the real answers without opening up Pandora's box. It is probably more info then most sit at home moms with bleeding hearts can comprehend. It is all relative in the end.
Natalee was a pawn in a very Big Game.jmho

 ::MonkeyShocked::

This "sit at home mom with a bleeding heart" as well as others do comprehend perfectly the far reaching domino effect if Joran or Paulus were to be held accountability for their participation in the the events of the morning of May 30, 2005.

This is the reason that I believe that justice for Natalee Holloway is never going to prevail in either an Aruba or Dutch courtroom.

Accountability will extent from Joran and Paulus to the sons of the elite .... to those within the Aruban/Dutch administration who played a role in the coverup ... to the paid-off witnesses ... to the judiciary ... to the owners of the establishments involved in Aruba's underground economy (drugs, alcohol, pornography, sex trade, gambling, money laundering) ...

Janet

I will take Justice anyway I can get it.  I have said this once so I will say it again.  It is time to start fighting dirty.  Aruba/Holland from day one has never fought a fair fight.  They caused the damage.  So now I say fight fire with fire and win at any cost.

I agree, San....but I don't know how to do that except hire a hit man and
I don't have a single hit man in my address book.

Wait let me check to see if I have any in my address book.  ::MonkeyHaHa::

I believe America is giving Aruba,as well as The Netherlands every opportunity to do right which they won't due!In time i believe Paulus,as well as Joran's exit from this planet will happen when we least expect it!Maybe from some "Bad" coffee,car accident or something of that nature.Their time will come.Hopefully sooner then later.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #787 12/24/08 -
Post by: San on December 27, 2008, 02:43:18 PM
The world is a bigger nastier place then most can even understand.

The answers are not simple. So people better dig deeper in understanding to get to the bottom of WHY Natalee was disappeared. Why Paulus exists, untouched. Why Joran is such a lure, FREE,Untouched. Why the Dutch play the game of "Help" "Concern" Yet show passive resistance in doing ANYTHING of true value.

Natalee is far more then just a case of a girl who was gang raped and disposed of.
Good luck in 2009 in finding eye opening revelations. I doubt we will find the real answers without opening up Pandora's box. It is probably more info then most sit at home moms with bleeding hearts can comprehend. It is all relative in the end.
Natalee was a pawn in a very Big Game.jmho

 ::MonkeyShocked::

This "sit at home mom with a bleeding heart" as well as others do comprehend perfectly the far reaching domino effect if Joran or Paulus were to be held accountability for their participation in the the events of the morning of May 30, 2005.

This is the reason that I believe that justice for Natalee Holloway is never going to prevail in either an Aruba or Dutch courtroom.

Accountability will extent from Joran and Paulus to the sons of the elite .... to those within the Aruban/Dutch administration who played a role in the coverup ... to the paid-off witnesses ... to the judiciary ... to the owners of the establishments involved in Aruba's underground economy (drugs, alcohol, pornography, sex trade, gambling, money laundering) ...

Janet

I will take Justice anyway I can get it.  I have said this once so I will say it again.  It is time to start fighting dirty.  Aruba/Holland from day one has never fought a fair fight.  They caused the damage.  So now I say fight fire with fire and win at any cost.

I agree, San....but I don't know how to do that except hire a hit man and
I don't have a single hit man in my address book.

Wait let me check to see if I have any in my address book.  ::MonkeyHaHa::

I believe America is giving Aruba,as well as The Netherlands every opportunity to do right which they won't due!In time i believe Paulus,as well as Joran's exit from this planet will happen when we least expect it!Maybe from some "Bad" coffee,car accident or something of that nature.Their time will come.Hopefully sooner then later.

And I will not have one ounce of sympathy for that entire family.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #787 12/24/08 -
Post by: texasmom on December 27, 2008, 02:44:25 PM
Good Morning San and texasmom.

Janet
11:00 AM PT

Good morning Janet!   ::MonkeyCool::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #787 12/24/08 -
Post by: texasmom on December 27, 2008, 02:47:19 PM
The world is a bigger nastier place then most can even understand.

The answers are not simple. So people better dig deeper in understanding to get to the bottom of WHY Natalee was disappeared. Why Paulus exists, untouched. Why Joran is such a lure, FREE,Untouched. Why the Dutch play the game of "Help" "Concern" Yet show passive resistance in doing ANYTHING of true value.

Natalee is far more then just a case of a girl who was gang raped and disposed of.
Good luck in 2009 in finding eye opening revelations. I doubt we will find the real answers without opening up Pandora's box. It is probably more info then most sit at home moms with bleeding hearts can comprehend. It is all relative in the end.
Natalee was a pawn in a very Big Game.jmho

 ::MonkeyShocked::

This "sit at home mom with a bleeding heart" as well as others do comprehend perfectly the far reaching domino effect if Joran or Paulus were to be held accountability for their participation in the the events of the morning of May 30, 2005.

This is the reason that I believe that justice for Natalee Holloway is never going to prevail in either an Aruba or Dutch courtroom.

Accountability will extent from Joran and Paulus to the sons of the elite .... to those within the Aruban/Dutch administration who played a role in the coverup ... to the paid-off witnesses ... to the judiciary ... to the owners of the establishments involved in Aruba's underground economy (drugs, alcohol, pornography, sex trade, gambling, money laundering) ...

Janet

I will take Justice anyway I can get it.  I have said this once so I will say it again.  It is time to start fighting dirty.  Aruba/Holland from day one has never fought a fair fight.  They caused the damage.  So now I say fight fire with fire and win at any cost.

I agree, San....but I don't know how to do that except hire a hit man and
I don't have a single hit man in my address book.

Wait let me check to see if I have any in my address book.  ::MonkeyHaHa::

I believe America is giving Aruba,as well as The Netherlands every opportunity to do right which they won't due!In time i believe Paulus,as well as Joran's exit from this planet will happen when we least expect it!Maybe from some "Bad" coffee,car accident or something of that nature.Their time will come.Hopefully sooner then later.

And I will not have one ounce of sympathy for that entire family.

Me either San! 


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #787 12/24/08 -
Post by: Tamikosmom on December 27, 2008, 03:10:24 PM
The world is a bigger nastier place then most can even understand.

The answers are not simple. So people better dig deeper in understanding to get to the bottom of WHY Natalee was disappeared. Why Paulus exists, untouched. Why Joran is such a lure, FREE,Untouched. Why the Dutch play the game of "Help" "Concern" Yet show passive resistance in doing ANYTHING of true value.

Natalee is far more then just a case of a girl who was gang raped and disposed of.
Good luck in 2009 in finding eye opening revelations. I doubt we will find the real answers without opening up Pandora's box. It is probably more info then most sit at home moms with bleeding hearts can comprehend. It is all relative in the end.
Natalee was a pawn in a very Big Game.jmho

 ::MonkeyShocked::

This "sit at home mom with a bleeding heart" as well as others do comprehend perfectly the far reaching domino effect if Joran or Paulus were to be held accountability for their participation in the the events of the morning of May 30, 2005.

This is the reason that I believe that justice for Natalee Holloway is never going to prevail in either an Aruba or Dutch courtroom.

Accountability will extent from Joran and Paulus to the sons of the elite .... to those within the Aruban/Dutch administration who played a role in the coverup ... to the paid-off witnesses ... to the judiciary ... to the owners of the establishments involved in Aruba's underground economy (drugs, alcohol, pornography, sex trade, gambling, money laundering) ...

Janet

I will take Justice anyway I can get it.  I have said this once so I will say it again.  It is time to start fighting dirty.  Aruba/Holland from day one has never fought a fair fight.  They caused the damage.  So now I say fight fire with fire and win at any cost.

I agree, San....but I don't know how to do that except hire a hit man and
I don't have a single hit man in my address book.

I do and ... hubby knows it.

How in the world do you think Tamikosmom has been able to keep this guy focused on only me for 43 years?  Love or fear ... it does not matter.  He is mine ... all mine.

 ::MonkeyHaHa::

Janet


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #787 12/24/08 -
Post by: texasmom on December 27, 2008, 03:13:04 PM
The world is a bigger nastier place then most can even understand.

The answers are not simple. So people better dig deeper in understanding to get to the bottom of WHY Natalee was disappeared. Why Paulus exists, untouched. Why Joran is such a lure, FREE,Untouched. Why the Dutch play the game of "Help" "Concern" Yet show passive resistance in doing ANYTHING of true value.

Natalee is far more then just a case of a girl who was gang raped and disposed of.
Good luck in 2009 in finding eye opening revelations. I doubt we will find the real answers without opening up Pandora's box. It is probably more info then most sit at home moms with bleeding hearts can comprehend. It is all relative in the end.
Natalee was a pawn in a very Big Game.jmho

 ::MonkeyShocked::

This "sit at home mom with a bleeding heart" as well as others do comprehend perfectly the far reaching domino effect if Joran or Paulus were to be held accountability for their participation in the the events of the morning of May 30, 2005.

This is the reason that I believe that justice for Natalee Holloway is never going to prevail in either an Aruba or Dutch courtroom.

Accountability will extent from Joran and Paulus to the sons of the elite .... to those within the Aruban/Dutch administration who played a role in the coverup ... to the paid-off witnesses ... to the judiciary ... to the owners of the establishments involved in Aruba's underground economy (drugs, alcohol, pornography, sex trade, gambling, money laundering) ...

Janet

I will take Justice anyway I can get it.  I have said this once so I will say it again.  It is time to start fighting dirty.  Aruba/Holland from day one has never fought a fair fight.  They caused the damage.  So now I say fight fire with fire and win at any cost.

I agree, San....but I don't know how to do that except hire a hit man and
I don't have a single hit man in my address book.

I do and ... hubby knows it.

How in the world do you think Tamikosmom has been able to keep this guy focused on only me for 43 years?  Love or fear ... it does not matter.  He is mine ... all mine.

 ::MonkeyHaHa::

Janet
::MonkeyHaHa::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #787 12/24/08 -
Post by: San on December 27, 2008, 03:25:40 PM
The world is a bigger nastier place then most can even understand.

The answers are not simple. So people better dig deeper in understanding to get to the bottom of WHY Natalee was disappeared. Why Paulus exists, untouched. Why Joran is such a lure, FREE,Untouched. Why the Dutch play the game of "Help" "Concern" Yet show passive resistance in doing ANYTHING of true value.

Natalee is far more then just a case of a girl who was gang raped and disposed of.
Good luck in 2009 in finding eye opening revelations. I doubt we will find the real answers without opening up Pandora's box. It is probably more info then most sit at home moms with bleeding hearts can comprehend. It is all relative in the end.
Natalee was a pawn in a very Big Game.jmho

 ::MonkeyShocked::

This "sit at home mom with a bleeding heart" as well as others do comprehend perfectly the far reaching domino effect if Joran or Paulus were to be held accountability for their participation in the the events of the morning of May 30, 2005.

This is the reason that I believe that justice for Natalee Holloway is never going to prevail in either an Aruba or Dutch courtroom.

Accountability will extent from Joran and Paulus to the sons of the elite .... to those within the Aruban/Dutch administration who played a role in the coverup ... to the paid-off witnesses ... to the judiciary ... to the owners of the establishments involved in Aruba's underground economy (drugs, alcohol, pornography, sex trade, gambling, money laundering) ...

Janet

I will take Justice anyway I can get it.  I have said this once so I will say it again.  It is time to start fighting dirty.  Aruba/Holland from day one has never fought a fair fight.  They caused the damage.  So now I say fight fire with fire and win at any cost.

I agree, San....but I don't know how to do that except hire a hit man and
I don't have a single hit man in my address book.

I do and ... hubby knows it.

How in the world do you think Tamikosmom has been able to keep this guy focused on only me for 43 years?  Love or fear ... it does not matter.  He is mine ... all mine.

 ::MonkeyHaHa::

Janet

 ::MonkeyHaHa::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #787 12/24/08 -
Post by: WhiskeyGirl on December 27, 2008, 03:32:50 PM
The world is a bigger nastier place then most can even understand.
The answers are not simple. So people better dig deeper in understanding to get to the bottom of WHY Natalee was disappeared. Why Paulus exists, untouched. Why Joran is such a lure, FREE,Untouched. Why the Dutch play the game of "Help" "Concern" Yet show passive resistance in doing ANYTHING of true value.
Natalee is far more then just a case of a girl who was gang raped and disposed of.
Good luck in 2009 in finding eye opening revelations. I doubt we will find the real answers without opening up Pandora's box. It is probably more info then most sit at home moms with bleeding hearts can comprehend. It is all relative in the end.
Natalee was a pawn in a very Big Game.
jmho

IMO, the finger is still pointing at PJ2K, JVS, and others, irregardless of where they currently reside.  It is as simple as PJ2K telling the truth.  Follow the truth, the cell phone calls, the money, the trail of evidence.  It starts and ends with that group.  Natalee is a victim, in my simple mind, there is no pawn.  Those on Aruba can and should return her to her family.  Do they have the will?

jmho


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #787 12/24/08 -
Post by: San on December 27, 2008, 03:51:36 PM
The world is a bigger nastier place then most can even understand.
The answers are not simple. So people better dig deeper in understanding to get to the bottom of WHY Natalee was disappeared. Why Paulus exists, untouched. Why Joran is such a lure, FREE,Untouched. Why the Dutch play the game of "Help" "Concern" Yet show passive resistance in doing ANYTHING of true value.
Natalee is far more then just a case of a girl who was gang raped and disposed of.
Good luck in 2009 in finding eye opening revelations. I doubt we will find the real answers without opening up Pandora's box. It is probably more info then most sit at home moms with bleeding hearts can comprehend. It is all relative in the end.
Natalee was a pawn in a very Big Game.
jmho

IMO, the finger is still pointing at PJ2K, JVS, and others, irregardless of where they currently reside.  It is as simple as PJ2K telling the truth.  Follow the truth, the cell phone calls, the money, the trail of evidence.  It starts and ends with that group.   Natalee is a victim, in my simple mind, there is no pawn.  Those on Aruba can and should return her to her family.  Do they have the will?

jmho


I agree that it begins and ends with them.  Paulus is a perverted old man past his prime many years ago.  We will never know the truth behind the real cell phone calls because that in itself will implicate many on that island and also in Holland.  The two phones that needed to be wire tapped were Paulus' and Anita's.

They do not have the will to return Natalee to her family because at this point they are reluctant to do so because of the shame they have already been put through.  Aruba is being spiteful.

In Aruba's mind they think they have won.  But did they really win and at what cost to the island.  One mother took on that entire island with the help of the news media.  She exposed the corruption.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #787 12/24/08 -
Post by: Keepthefaith on December 27, 2008, 04:12:35 PM
THE TRUTH SHALL SET YOU FREE KYLE........GOD BLESS...... ::MonkeyWink::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #787 12/24/08 -
Post by: Magnolia on December 27, 2008, 04:13:24 PM
So besides dealing with the corrupt Aruban hitmen we had to deal with the corrupt American Traitors.

Truer words were never spoken.  American traitors who pretended to
help Natalee's family in the beginning and those who pretended to
search for her remains while furthering their own business interest.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #787 12/24/08 -
Post by: Keepthefaith on December 27, 2008, 04:15:23 PM
So besides dealing with the corrupt Aruban hitmen we had to deal with the corrupt American Traitors.

Truer words were never spoken.  American traitors who pretended to
help Natalee's family in the beginning and those who pretended to
search for her remains while furthering their own business interest.


AMEN.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #787 12/24/08 -
Post by: Magnolia on December 27, 2008, 04:24:20 PM
THE TRUTH SHALL SET YOU FREE KYLE........GOD BLESS...... ::MonkeyWink::

Kyle wrote all of that prose with religious undertones and I fell for
it hook, line and sinker.  I even felt protective of the boy.
I have decided he was nothing more than a silver-tongued devil.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #787 12/24/08 -
Post by: truthseeker2 on December 27, 2008, 04:26:44 PM
The world is a bigger nastier place then most can even understand.
The answers are not simple. So people better dig deeper in understanding to get to the bottom of WHY Natalee was disappeared. Why Paulus exists, untouched. Why Joran is such a lure, FREE,Untouched. Why the Dutch play the game of "Help" "Concern" Yet show passive resistance in doing ANYTHING of true value.
Natalee is far more then just a case of a girl who was gang raped and disposed of.
Good luck in 2009 in finding eye opening revelations. I doubt we will find the real answers without opening up Pandora's box. It is probably more info then most sit at home moms with bleeding hearts can comprehend. It is all relative in the end.
Natalee was a pawn in a very Big Game.
jmho

Yes, I agree.  This is not about a bunch of 'bad boys' who are so schooled in the art of getting rid of bodies that no one would be able to find them.  The cover up began on 5/30 and it continues even today.  Why is Joran and/or Paulus Van Der Sloot worth all of this to Aruba and to the Netherlands?  This could have been over with years ago, but they let it continue.  I just do not believe that people on Aruba do not know the truth.  They know.  So how deep does it go and if this is in any way political you would think there are enough people who oppose the current government that they would come together and expose the truth.  But they haven't.  In politics, no matter the country, the only thing politicians really care about is the amount of money thrown their way and their image.

So, why haven't the opposing politicians put this to rest?  What about this is so bad that even those hungry for power in Aruba will not take charge of letting the truth be told?

The idea that letting the rest of the world know that some of their citizens committed a brutal crime and were sent to jail for it would not be nearly as damaging as what they have done and continue to do now.  So...who or what are they afraid of????


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #787 12/24/08 -
Post by: San on December 27, 2008, 04:27:02 PM
THE TRUTH SHALL SET YOU FREE KYLE........GOD BLESS...... ::MonkeyWink::

Kyle wrote all of that prose with religious undertones and I fell for
it hook, line and sinker.  I even felt protective of the boy.
I have decided he was nothing more than a silver-tongued devil.

When he first posted I didn't pay attention to what he said.  For some reason when I have an uncomfortable feeling about a person I stop myself from listening.  This happened with two people recently.  One was Kyle.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #787 12/24/08 -
Post by: Tamikosmom on December 27, 2008, 04:27:22 PM

<snipped>

They do not have the will to return Natalee to her family because at this point they are reluctant to do so because of the shame they have already been put through.  Aruba is being spiteful.

<snipped>


If Kyle Kingman were to do right because it is right and ... step forward and reveal to the FBI all he knows regarding the dynamics behind the deception of the Persistence undertaking ... I believe that Aruba has no choice but to return Natalee Holloway's remains to her family.  Without this this measure of closure ... Aruba will continue to be haunted by a mother who will continue to be a voice for her daughter for the next 36 years.

Janet
________

'Scarborough Country' for Oct. 24th
updated 7:06 a.m. PT, Tues., Oct. 25, 2005


HOLLOWAY TWITTY: ... I have told Prime Minister Oduber that I will do this, I will be the voice of Natalee for the next 40 years. And I hope I have that long, because I will do it as long as I can.

http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/9813596/


KYLE KINGMAN'S POSTS TO A PRIVATE FORUM

Kyle: I have not given anything to the FBI since the pictures and statements from Dec 29th

Kyle: None of us gave any statements to the authorities after the 29th. It's possible John Silvetti did, because he was the only one conversing with them after Jan 7th.

Kyle: I've talked with Peter Shouten numerous times back in February. He hasn't seen anything but knows about the blue fabrics. DeVries and Endemol was interested in purchasing the ROV footage and I was working between them, ABC, and CBS to strike a deal.

Kyle: In case it isn't clear.. notice the blue denim-like fabric

Kyle: The Aruban divers were on the police boat, dove from their boat, and returned to their boat.

Kyle: They were immediately whisked away by the Aruban police and not seen of again by us on the 7th

Kyle: John stood back and waited and worked with the Aruban Polis

Kyle: John definitely believed the Arubans at their every word

Kyle: John didn't want Tim Miller on board the Persistence because he said Tim wasn't necessary any more and was a liability

Kyle: John told me then he didn't want to hear me ever mention the trap again.

Kyle: Schafer is sue crazy.

Kyle: I did not feel the same and we had a major difference in opinion. He [John Silvetti] was the one who never pressed ALE to be completely open with us with the trap evidence. I would have forced them to. However, John was the one paying my invoices so I was forced to sit back and hope for the best.

Kyle: We all know it wasn't a blouse, but I believe they were sent some piece of fabric other than the fabric found inside the trap.

Kyle: We're being fed misinformation to keep us searching and out of their way while they cover their asses, destroy evidence, cover their tracks, and keep us out at sea and away from the trap.

Kyle: I've talked with Peter Shouten numerous times back in February. He hasn't seen anything but knows about the blue fabrics. DeVries and Endemol was interested in purchasing the ROV footage and I was working between them, ABC, and CBS to strike a deal.

Kyle: Louis is currently working with someone who I do not know to put together some documentary on the case, the way it was handled, and what happened during the search. I learned this from Tim T. yesterday. Louis was sold on the idea that it will make him a lot of money.

Kyle: The portion of the discolored blue fabric was presumably on the bottom of the fabric. In my opinion this discoloration is not another type of fabric, but rather biological staining or discoloration from biological growth caused from a high organic carbon content and decay. Basically, during decay a biological mat will form around the organics from remains. This is what I believe it is on the bottom of the fabric.

Kyle: John Silvetti told me today that he may be returning to Aruba very soon for a few days.

Kyle: I couldn't get the logs from the Persistence. All things "Holloway" were stripped from the boat once it got back to Louisiana

Kyle: It was confirmed by the FBI that they received a fabric sample send by Richardson and that it wasn't a match to Natalee's blouse. I think the video can prove or disprove whatever the FBI was sent was the same object or not. I strongly believe it's blue denim. Everyone I show thinks the same thing without being prompted (including senior ABC execs).

Klye: We're being fed misinformation to keep us searching and out of their way while they cover their asses, destroy evidence, cover their tracks, and keep us out at sea and away from the trap.

Kyle: neither Dave, Robin, or Beth has seen any of the ROV footage aside from what was broadcasted on Dateline or the pictures leaked from the FBI to Dave (and Robin H.). Beth has seen nothing in my knowledge.

Kyle: John is not a believer in the trap. He took ALE's word as gospel that it wasn't case related, yet never studied the videos or bothered to inquire further. He had plans on doing business with Aruba and in S. America and he didn't want to hurt any feelings by talks hinting at lack of complete trust and friendship.

Kyle: Notice the end of the skirt is an identical match to the 90 degree angle in the sand. I believe her left arm was outstretched with her legs slightly bent. I did not edit the legs. I believe the tarp was placed over her and tucked around her, or perhaps tied down. I believe there are several rocks laying on the sand which were placed on the tarp, or inside the tarp over her body which explains their unusual location. Either way, the proportions appear promising.

Kyle: I took the proportions of the body form from the head, to shoulder, to a 90 degree angle which I believed to be the hem line of Natalee's skirt. I then took those proportions and matched them to the photo of Natalee with what she was last seen wearing. The proportions matched within an inch from head, to shoulder, to skirt line. Based on this comparison and with what we believed we saw in the Dec 29th video, Tim Miller contacted the family and told them the 99.9% comment. I told Tim not to do anything until we have forensic results back after the site is processed. Jan 7th we sampled the contents and in my opinion we found the skirt under the sand along with the other items The blue fabric was found right where the skirt is pictured. If it isn't her, it will forever haunt me as a major cosmic WTF.

kyle: Richardson was onboard the Persistence several times and attended the meetings on the boat. You may see a glimpse of him on the Dateline video in the survey room along with Mos standing over my shoulder.



Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #787 12/24/08 -
Post by: Magnolia on December 27, 2008, 04:33:56 PM
THE TRUTH SHALL SET YOU FREE KYLE........GOD BLESS...... ::MonkeyWink::

Kyle wrote all of that prose with religious undertones and I fell for
it hook, line and sinker.  I even felt protective of the boy.
I have decided he was nothing more than a silver-tongued devil.



When he first posted I didn't pay attention to what he said.  For some reason when I have an uncomfortable feeling about a person I stop myself from listening.  This happened with two people recently.  One was Kyle.

And you are usually right on the mark as far as judging people.
I have never known of you to be wrong.   ::MonkeyCool::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #787 12/24/08 -
Post by: Tamikosmom on December 27, 2008, 04:37:56 PM
THE TRUTH SHALL SET YOU FREE KYLE........GOD BLESS...... ::MonkeyWink::

Kyle wrote all of that prose with religious undertones and I fell for
it hook, line and sinker.  I even felt protective of the boy.
I have decided he was nothing more than a silver-tongued devil.

I am still trusting that Kyle's faith will be the catalyst to bring him to his knees ... ask God for forgiveness ... ask Natalee's family for forgiveness and ... then do what is right in revealing his perspective regarding the Persistence endeavor ... an endeavor that had everything to do with John S. assisting in THE FINALE TO THE GREAT ARUBAN COVERUP!!

Natalee Holloway was betrayed by John S.  The family was betrayed by John S.  The sacrificial donors were betrayed John S.

If the contents of that cage/trap were Natalee Holloway's remains ... the family deserved to at least know the truth.

Janet


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #787 12/24/08 -
Post by: San on December 27, 2008, 04:55:33 PM
THE TRUTH SHALL SET YOU FREE KYLE........GOD BLESS...... ::MonkeyWink::

Kyle wrote all of that prose with religious undertones and I fell for
it hook, line and sinker.  I even felt protective of the boy.
I have decided he was nothing more than a silver-tongued devil.



When he first posted I didn't pay attention to what he said.  For some reason when I have an uncomfortable feeling about a person I stop myself from listening.  This happened with two people recently.  One was Kyle.

And you are usually right on the mark as far as judging people.
I have never known of you to be wrong.   ::MonkeyCool::

Thank you Magnolia.  Your opinion means a lot to me.  You are always on target with your posts.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #787 12/24/08 -
Post by: San on December 27, 2008, 05:26:47 PM
THE TRUTH SHALL SET YOU FREE KYLE........GOD BLESS...... ::MonkeyWink::

Kyle wrote all of that prose with religious undertones and I fell for
it hook, line and sinker.  I even felt protective of the boy.
I have decided he was nothing more than a silver-tongued devil.

I am still trusting that Kyle's faith will be the catalyst to bring him to his knees ... ask God for forgiveness ... ask Natalee's family for forgiveness and ... then do what is right in revealing his perspective regarding the Persistence endeavor ... an endeavor that had everything to do with John S. assisting in THE FINALE TO THE GREAT ARUBAN COVERUP!!

Natalee Holloway was betrayed by John S.  The family was betrayed by John S.  The sacrificial donors were betrayed John S.

If the contents of that cage/trap were Natalee Holloway's remains ... the family deserved to at least know the truth.

Janet

One would hope that someone on that boat had a conscience.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #787 12/24/08 -
Post by: Blonde on December 27, 2008, 05:32:28 PM
The world is a bigger nastier place then most can even understand.

The answers are not simple. So people better dig deeper in understanding to get to the bottom of WHY Natalee was disappeared. Why Paulus exists, untouched. Why Joran is such a lure, FREE,Untouched. Why the Dutch play the game of "Help" "Concern" Yet show passive resistance in doing ANYTHING of true value.

Natalee is far more then just a case of a girl who was gang raped and disposed of.
Good luck in 2009 in finding eye opening revelations. I doubt we will find the real answers without opening up Pandora's box. It is probably more info then most sit at home moms with bleeding hearts can comprehend. It is all relative in the end.
Natalee was a pawn in a very Big Game.jmho

 ::MonkeyShocked::

This "sit at home mom with a bleeding heart" as well as others do comprehend perfectly the far reaching domino effect if Joran or Paulus were to be held accountability for their participation in the the events of the morning of May 30, 2005.

This is the reason that I believe that justice for Natalee Holloway is never going to prevail in either an Aruba or Dutch courtroom.

Accountability will extent from Joran and Paulus to the sons of the elite .... to those within the Aruban/Dutch administration who played a role in the coverup ... to the paid-off witnesses ... to the judiciary ... to the owners of the establishments involved in Aruba's underground economy (drugs, alcohol, pornography, sex trade, gambling, money laundering) ...

Janet

I will take Justice anyway I can get it.  I have said this once so I will say it again.  It is time to start fighting dirty.  Aruba/Holland from day one has never fought a fair fight.  They caused the damage.  So now I say fight fire with fire and win at any cost.

I agree, San....but I don't know how to do that except hire a hit man and
I don't have a single hit man in my address book.

Wait let me check to see if I have any in my address book.  ::MonkeyHaHa::

I DO ::MonkeyWink::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #787 12/24/08 -
Post by: flamom on December 27, 2008, 05:58:14 PM
I don't know if this has been posted and forgive me if it is a repat but Monday December 29th, E! News Special on Natalee Holloway @ 10pm


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #787 12/24/08 -
Post by: Nut44x4 on December 27, 2008, 05:59:48 PM
Thanks flamom!


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #787 12/24/08 -
Post by: RoxiBalboa on December 27, 2008, 08:09:48 PM
Happy Holidays Monkeys!

It has been mentioned several times that Arubans aren't really as informed on the case as Americans, especially Monkeys. I was wondering if it would be possible for some of the super smart, informed Monkeys to put together facts (and even some pictures, trap etc) in an editorial and then get it published in Diario. Get the information to the Aruban poeple as well.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #787 12/24/08 -
Post by: San on December 27, 2008, 08:35:41 PM
Happy Holidays Monkeys!

It has been mentioned several times that Arubans aren't really as informed on the case as Americans, especially Monkeys. I was wondering if it would be possible for some of the super smart, informed Monkeys to put together facts (and even some pictures, trap etc) in an editorial and then get it published in Diario. Get the information to the Aruban poeple as well.

I just feel that the Arubans don't care.  I don't believe for one second that they are not informed.  They all know what went down on that island.  Most have access to the internet.

I often wonder why Jossy Mansur himself has not done his own editorial regarding these pictures.  I am sure he is aware of them and what stops him from informing the people himself.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #787 12/24/08 -
Post by: Magnolia on December 27, 2008, 08:43:15 PM
The world is a bigger nastier place then most can even understand.

The answers are not simple. So people better dig deeper in understanding to get to the bottom of WHY Natalee was disappeared. Why Paulus exists, untouched. Why Joran is such a lure, FREE,Untouched. Why the Dutch play the game of "Help" "Concern" Yet show passive resistance in doing ANYTHING of true value.

Natalee is far more then just a case of a girl who was gang raped and disposed of.
Good luck in 2009 in finding eye opening revelations. I doubt we will find the real answers without opening up Pandora's box. It is probably more info then most sit at home moms with bleeding hearts can comprehend. It is all relative in the end.
Natalee was a pawn in a very Big Game.jmho

 ::MonkeyShocked::

This "sit at home mom with a bleeding heart" as well as others do comprehend perfectly the far reaching domino effect if Joran or Paulus were to be held accountability for their participation in the the events of the morning of May 30, 2005.

This is the reason that I believe that justice for Natalee Holloway is never going to prevail in either an Aruba or Dutch courtroom.

Accountability will extent from Joran and Paulus to the sons of the elite .... to those within the Aruban/Dutch administration who played a role in the coverup ... to the paid-off witnesses ... to the judiciary ... to the owners of the establishments involved in Aruba's underground economy (drugs, alcohol, pornography, sex trade, gambling, money laundering) ...

Janet

I will take Justice anyway I can get it.  I have said this once so I will say it again.  It is time to start fighting dirty.  Aruba/Holland from day one has never fought a fair fight.  They caused the damage.  So now I say fight fire with fire and win at any cost.

I agree, San....but I don't know how to do that except hire a hit man and
I don't have a single hit man in my address book.

Wait let me check to see if I have any in my address book.  ::MonkeyHaHa::

I DO ::MonkeyWink::

I will give a considerable donation to the cause.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #787 12/24/08 -
Post by: Tamikosmom on December 27, 2008, 08:57:22 PM
Happy Holidays Monkeys!

It has been mentioned several times that Arubans aren't really as informed on the case as Americans, especially Monkeys. I was wondering if it would be possible for some of the super smart, informed Monkeys to put together facts (and even some pictures, trap etc) in an editorial and then get it published in Diario. Get the information to the Aruban poeple as well.

I just feel that the Arubans don't care.  I don't believe for one second that they are not informed.  They all know what went down on that island.  Most have access to the internet.

I often wonder why Jossy Mansur himself has not done his own editorial regarding these pictures.  I am sure he is aware of them and what stops him from informing the people himself.

I do believe that the copyright to these photos may belong to Schaefer or ... it may have been sold to a network and ... then without Kyle attesting to the happenings aboard the Persistence ... there is no proof that the endeavor was not about justice for Natalee Holloway and ... a measure of closure for her family.   There is no proof that the endeavor was about John Silvetti's self-serving motives.

Janet
________

KYLE KINGMAN'S POSTS SUBMITED TO A PRIVATE FORUM

Kyle: I've talked with Peter Shouten numerous times back in February. He hasn't seen anything but knows about the blue fabrics. DeVries and Endemol was interested in purchasing the ROV footage and I was working between them, ABC, and CBS to strike a deal.

Kyle: John is not a believer in the trap. He took ALE's word as gospel that it wasn't case related, yet never studied the videos or bothered to inquire further. He had plans on doing business with Aruba and in S. America and he didn't want to hurt any feelings by talks hinting at lack of complete trust and friendship.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #787 12/24/08 -
Post by: Tamikosmom on December 27, 2008, 09:11:13 PM
Happy Holidays Monkeys!

It has been mentioned several times that Arubans aren't really as informed on the case as Americans, especially Monkeys. I was wondering if it would be possible for some of the super smart, informed Monkeys to put together facts (and even some pictures, trap etc) in an editorial and then get it published in Diario. Get the information to the Aruban poeple as well.

I just feel that the Arubans don't care.  I don't believe for one second that they are not informed.  They all know what went down on that island.  Most have access to the internet.

I often wonder why Jossy Mansur himself has not done his own editorial regarding these pictures.  I am sure he is aware of them and what stops him from informing the people himself.

Arubans knew the truth from the getgo but ... justice for an 18 year old American citizen was not a concern.  Arubans just wanted the Natalee Holloway story to go away ... just wanted Beth Holloway to go away ... so the Tourist Industry could again thrive.

Beth and Jug see through the facade.  They have both publicly stated that they do not have any advocates on that Island except Jossy Mansur.

The people of Aruba have no problem demonstrating in mass when it comes to wages or ... drug, choller and environmental issues.  Also ... they are able to organize demonstration against an anquished mother who dared to call two suspects criminals ... two suspects who obstructed the investigation into her missing daughter with their lies.  However ... in 3 1/2  years there has not even been one "tiny" demonstration by the "good people" of Aruba on behalf of justice for Natalee Holloway.

Janet

+++++++++++++

DANA PLETZER
October 5, 2007


JOSSY MANSUR: People thought Beth caused bad publicity for the island, but Beth is not at fault, it is the three suspects.If there's damage to the island it should be on the shoulders of the three suspects.

http://scaredmonkeysradio.com/2007/10/05/the-dana-pretzer-show-live-friday-october-5-2007-guests-include-jossy-mansur-and-ken-shepherd/


CNN LIVE TODAY
Missing in Aruba
Aired July 5, 2005 - 10:00   ET


BETH HOLLOWAY TWITTY, NATALEE HOLLOWAY’S MOTHER: It is now that I ask the world to help me. Two suspects were released yesterday who were involved in a violent crime against my daughter. These criminals are not only allowed to walk freely among the tourists and citizens of Aruba, but there are no limits where they may choose to travel.

I am asking all mothers and fathers and all nations to hear my plea. I implore you, do not allow these two suspects, the Kalpoe brothers, to enter your country until this case is solved. Do not allow these criminals to walk among your citizens. Help me by not allowing these two to get away with this crime.

It is my greatest fear today that the Kalpoe brothers will leave Aruba. I am asking the Aruban officials to notify the United States State Department in the event these suspects try to leave this island. I am asking all nations not to offer them a safe haven. I am asking this in the name of my beautiful, intelligent and outstanding daughter who I haven’t seen for 36 days and for whom I will continue to search until I find her.

http://transcripts.cnn.com/TRANSCRIPTS/0507/05/lt.03.html


Beth Holloway
LOVING NATALEE
Page 157/158


No one is breathing. Or Moving. Reporters and camera people are crying. The media hve been here more than a month, and they’ve seen firsthand what we’ve experienced. They are moved by this plea. But some of the Arubans are not. Calling their local sons “criminals” offends them. Having just heard the prosecuting attorney tell us at least one of the Kalpoes could be involved in whatever happened to my daughter. I felt the term seemed appropriate. But it led to an abrupt change in the tide of support.

… Not long after the “criminals speech,” some Arubans back off their prayer vigils for Natalee. A few protest in the streets against the barage of negative media. We’ve worn out our welcome at the Holiday Inn. And they let us know they’ve had it. The Aruban Tourism Authority (ATA), the Aruba Hotel and Tourism Association (AHATA), the Aruba Trade and Industry Association and a scattering of island officials establish the Strategic Communications Task Force to combat the negative media. And to combat us.


Some Arubans angry at Holloway’s mom
Calling brothers ‘criminals’ elicits resentment, statement from lawyer
updated 6:56 p.m. PT, Wed., July. 6, 2005


ORANJESTAD, Aruba - A latent but growing resentment here became evident for the first time when more than 200 people, some wrapped in Aruban flags, said they were incensed by statements made by the mother of missing American teen Natalee Holloway.

http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/8484217


'Scarborough Country' for July 6
updated 8:11 a.m. PT, Thurs., July. 7, 2005


JOHN MERRYWEATHER, FORMER ARUBA DIPLOMAT: I was not part of the organization, but I went there in support of our justice system.

<snipped?

SCARBOROUGH: No, what did Natalee’s mother say that offended so many people in Aruba?

MERRYWEATHER: Well, you know, it—it—it offended me, also.

http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/8498049/


Missing teen's mom apologizes for comments
Statements 'fueled by despair'
Friday, July 8, 2005; Posted: 6:41 p.m. EDT (22:41 GMT)

 
ORANJESTAD, Aruba (CNN) — The mother of Natalee Holloway apologized Friday for saying two released suspects were involved in her daughter’s disappearance.

“The statements I made on July 5th were fueled by despair and frustration because of still not knowing where my daughter is,” Beth Holloway Twitty said in a statement to the media. “I think everyone, everyone can sympathize with that.”

http://www.cnn.com/2005/LAW/07/08/missing.aruba/index.html


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #787 12/24/08 -
Post by: San on December 27, 2008, 09:11:37 PM
Happy Holidays Monkeys!

It has been mentioned several times that Arubans aren't really as informed on the case as Americans, especially Monkeys. I was wondering if it would be possible for some of the super smart, informed Monkeys to put together facts (and even some pictures, trap etc) in an editorial and then get it published in Diario. Get the information to the Aruban poeple as well.

I just feel that the Arubans don't care.  I don't believe for one second that they are not informed.  They all know what went down on that island.  Most have access to the internet.

I often wonder why Jossy Mansur himself has not done his own editorial regarding these pictures.  I am sure he is aware of them and what stops him from informing the people himself.

I do believe that the copyright to these photos may belong to Schaefer or ... it may have been sold to a network and ... then without Kyle attesting to the happenings aboard the Persistence ... there is no proof that the endeavor was not about justice for Natalee Holloway and ... a measure of closure for her family.   There is no proof that the endeavor was about John Silvetti's self-serving motives.

Janet
________

KYLE KINGMAN'S POSTS SUBMITED TO A PRIVATE FORUM

Kyle: I've talked with Peter Shouten numerous times back in February. He hasn't seen anything but knows about the blue fabrics. DeVries and Endemol was interested in purchasing the ROV footage and I was working between them, ABC, and CBS to strike a deal.

Kyle: John is not a believer in the trap. He took ALE's word as gospel  that it wasn't case related, yet never studied the videos or bothered to inquire further. He had plans on doing business with Aruba and in S. America and he didn't want to hurt any feelings by talks hinting at lack of complete trust and friendship.

No one is this dumb in life.    When you go on an endeavor like this you have all the facts in this case and one fact was clear to everyone and that was the ALE is corrupt to the core.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #787 12/24/08 -
Post by: Tamikosmom on December 27, 2008, 09:16:02 PM
igsigs

Scared Monkeys Video Paul Van Der Sloot Memory Lapses

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SiVKwLpsza0

 ::MonkeyHaHa::

Janet



Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #787 12/24/08 -
Post by: Tamikosmom on December 27, 2008, 09:23:49 PM
igsigs

Scared Monkeys Video Paul Van Der Sloot Memory Lapses

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SiVKwLpsza0

 ::MonkeyHaHa::

Janet




igsigs
Lively Case Discussion #641 6/16 - 6/19/2007
« Reply #363 on: June 17, 2007, 10:48:52 PM »


PAULUS 6/23 PV

Suspect did remark that he is willing to tell us everything he remembers if this somehow gives clarity in the case of Natalee Holloway gone missing.

I cannot precisely recollect
It is possible
But i do not remember
I cannot remember exactly
It is possible but i cannot remember
I cannot remember
The exact time i cannot remember
I at least cannot remember
I cannot exactly remember
I cannot remember anymore
I cannot remember
I cannot exactly remember anymore
I do not know for sure
I cannot visually play back in my own mind
I cannot remember
I cannot remember
To the best of my recollection
I cannot remember however
I cannot remember
I an not 100% sure of that
I cannot remember anymore
I am not sure
I do not remember whether i did
I do not remember
I cannot remember whether i did
Maybe i did
I cannot remember anymore
I cannot remember what i did
I was busy in the kitchen and did not hear
I cannot remember
I think i went to work
I do not remember
I don't exactly remember anymore
I do not remember


http://scaredmonkeys.net/index.php?topic=1223.msg182463;topicseen#msg182463





Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #787 12/24/08 -
Post by: San on December 27, 2008, 09:25:04 PM
igsigs

Scared Monkeys Video Paul Van Der Sloot Memory Lapses

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SiVKwLpsza0

 ::MonkeyHaHa::

Janet


 ::MonkeyHaHa::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #787 12/24/08 -
Post by: Tamikosmom on December 27, 2008, 09:26:50 PM
IGSIGS ... WHERE DID YOU GO???s

 ::MonkeyWaa::

Janet


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #787 12/24/08 -
Post by: texasmom on December 27, 2008, 09:27:02 PM
I came across this in the archives not long ago, I think credit for it goes to Carpe; but I'm not sure.

(http://i21.photobucket.com/albums/b258/texasmom55/PVDS/PVDSppppp.jpg)

 ::MonkeyHaHa::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #787 12/24/08 -
Post by: Tamikosmom on December 27, 2008, 09:35:51 PM
I came across this in the archives not long ago, I think credit for it goes to Carpe; but I'm not sure.

(http://i21.photobucket.com/albums/b258/texasmom55/PVDS/PVDSppppp.jpg)

 ::MonkeyHaHa::

I don't get it.

 ::MonkeyWaa::

Janet


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #787 12/24/08 -
Post by: texasmom on December 27, 2008, 09:39:49 PM
Happy Holidays Monkeys!

It has been mentioned several times that Arubans aren't really as informed on the case as Americans, especially Monkeys. I was wondering if it would be possible for some of the super smart, informed Monkeys to put together facts (and even some pictures, trap etc) in an editorial and then get it published in Diario. Get the information to the Aruban poeple as well.

I just feel that the Arubans don't care.  I don't believe for one second that they are not informed.  They all know what went down on that island.  Most have access to the internet.

I often wonder why Jossy Mansur himself has not done his own editorial regarding these pictures.  I am sure he is aware of them and what stops him from informing the people himself.

If John Silvetti traveled to Aruba to attend Jossy's daughter's wedding there is some relationship there.  I'd like to know what that relationship is.  Seems like an expensive trip to attend the wedding of a casual aquaintance.... 


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #787 12/24/08 -
Post by: texasmom on December 27, 2008, 09:43:33 PM
I came across this in the archives not long ago, I think credit for it goes to Carpe; but I'm not sure.

(http://i21.photobucket.com/albums/b258/texasmom55/PVDS/PVDSppppp.jpg)

 ::MonkeyHaHa::

I don't get it.

 ::MonkeyWaa::

Janet

 
Janet,
I think whoever made the picture was just making fun of Paulus' lack of memory for just about everything; and his reasoning for his answers to some questions.  I think the "underwear" and his failure to remember if he had any on or not was just being sarcastic since he seemed to not be able to remember much of anything.  I hope I have not confused you more!

 ::MonkeyHaHa::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #787 12/24/08 -
Post by: San on December 27, 2008, 09:55:29 PM
Happy Holidays Monkeys!

It has been mentioned several times that Arubans aren't really as informed on the case as Americans, especially Monkeys. I was wondering if it would be possible for some of the super smart, informed Monkeys to put together facts (and even some pictures, trap etc) in an editorial and then get it published in Diario. Get the information to the Aruban poeple as well.

I just feel that the Arubans don't care.  I don't believe for one second that they are not informed.  They all know what went down on that island.  Most have access to the internet.

I often wonder why Jossy Mansur himself has not done his own editorial regarding these pictures.  I am sure he is aware of them and what stops him from informing the people himself.

If John Silvetti traveled to Aruba to attend Jossy's daughter's wedding there is some relationship there.  I'd like to know what that relationship is.  Seems like an expensive trip to attend the wedding of a casual aquaintance.... 

I agree.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #787 12/24/08 -
Post by: Tamikosmom on December 27, 2008, 09:59:40 PM
I came across this in the archives not long ago, I think credit for it goes to Carpe; but I'm not sure.

(http://i21.photobucket.com/albums/b258/texasmom55/PVDS/PVDSppppp.jpg)

 ::MonkeyHaHa::

I don't get it.

 ::MonkeyWaa::

Janet

 
Janet,
I think whoever made the picture was just making fun of Paulus' lack of memory for just about everything; and his reasoning for his answers to some questions.  I think the "underwear" and his failure to remember if he had any on or not was just being sarcastic since he seemed to not be able to remember much of anything.  I hope I have not confused you more!

 ::MonkeyHaHa::

 ::MonkeyHaHa::

I get it.

Janet


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #787 12/24/08 -
Post by: Tamikosmom on December 27, 2008, 10:01:35 PM
Happy Holidays Monkeys!

It has been mentioned several times that Arubans aren't really as informed on the case as Americans, especially Monkeys. I was wondering if it would be possible for some of the super smart, informed Monkeys to put together facts (and even some pictures, trap etc) in an editorial and then get it published in Diario. Get the information to the Aruban poeple as well.

I just feel that the Arubans don't care.  I don't believe for one second that they are not informed.  They all know what went down on that island.  Most have access to the internet.

I often wonder why Jossy Mansur himself has not done his own editorial regarding these pictures.  I am sure he is aware of them and what stops him from informing the people himself.

If John Silvetti traveled to Aruba to attend Jossy's daughter's wedding  there is some relationship there.  I'd like to know what that relationship is.  Seems like an expensive trip to attend the wedding of a casual aquaintance.... 

 

 ::MonkeyShocked::

The plot thickens.

Janet


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #787 12/24/08 -
Post by: Edward on December 27, 2008, 11:19:51 PM
The plot needs to get a little thicker yet..
What ever happened to the supposed visiting Saudi or Paki or some sort of royalty with a twisty turban top that was supposedly on Aruba with a Jet when Natalee went missing ./.
Was any of that True? I remember some conversation and I did get some notes on it.
I do not remember if it was all smoke in the end.

It was kind of like the plastic bag.. after awhile it had rats and bones and I just have no idea how that happened.. Or if it was real .. ? I know that plastic bag was real..  ::MonkeyWink::



Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #787 12/24/08 -
Post by: texasmom on December 28, 2008, 12:54:25 AM
 ::MonkeyShocked::
24ora is broadcasting live from Senor Frogs...Mark Benson's birthday bash.

http://www.24ora.com/component/option,com_frontpage/Itemid,1/

I think it's almost 2am there, but it's still going on!


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #787 12/24/08 -
Post by: Linda in MD on December 28, 2008, 02:41:36 AM
http://www.amigoe.com/english/

Human trafficking a concern in the Caribbean
23 Dec, 2008, 08:09 (GMT -04:00)

WILLEMSTAD/THE HAGUE – “The Caribbean is definitely a worrisome area”, said Justice-minister Ernst Hirsch Ballin (CDA) about the human trafficking during a Justice-deliberation of the Lower House-committee.  He reacted on questions of PvdA-Member of parliament Khadija Arib about the cooperation with the Neth.Antilles and Aruba.  That’s the reason for the cooperation in the aliens’ supervision that we are currently giving shape.”

One of the issues that Arib raised was ‘the human trafficking via islands like Bonaire and the Windward Islands’.  “I do understand that per January 1, these islands are comparable with a Dutch municipality.  According to a report from Brazil, women from that country are rather often dealt in via Surinam for example to these islands.  How is human trafficking going to be suppressed in these new municipalities?”
“We are more in general busy with the reinforcing of the immigration chain in Aruba and in the Neth.Antilles, which also affects countries of origin in the Caribbean and South-America”, was Hirsch Ballin’s answer.

The cooperation that the Netherlands has offered is accepted.  “This also counts for the Windward Islands and Bonaire that later are going to be part of the Dutch government, if the plans that are currently in preparation for this, are accepted.  The first move in the cooperation was a mini-conference that I participated in; at that time well-coordinated with the deliberation in Aruba on other maintenance of law and order subjects.  The discussion was mainly aimed at making assistance and expertise available.”


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #787 12/24/08 -
Post by: johan555 on December 28, 2008, 07:33:55 AM
justice is still receiving new tips

(http://www.revu.nl/pix/artikel/12763_main.jpg)

The Public Prosecutor (OM) hopes to Aruba in February to decide whether Joran van der Sloot will be prosecuted in the case of Natalee Holloway. It was envisaged that this decision around Christmas was already taken, but the Algemeen Dagblad reported that justice is still receiving new tips.

Thanks to the great media attention for the disappearance of Natalee was given the Dutch-Aruban investigators still regularly with new tips. Only last month said a friend of Joran that he had told her that his father knew of the case. It was heard by the search.

"In order to examine the tips we need more time," said a spokesperson for the PPS to the newspaper about the decision of the head officer in February at knot by the heels. "We think than enough to have a decision to take on further prosecutions."


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #787 12/24/08 -
Post by: Edward on December 28, 2008, 08:46:48 AM
wow ..That sounds like some kiss ass garbled Carp. ::MonkeyEek::

1.hopes to.
2.knot by the heels.
3.paulus knew of the case..
4.they need more time.. it is all so complicated.. ::MonkeyRoll::
It is hard to get all the crumpled up papers into the garbage can from acrosss the room. ::MonkeyTongue::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #787 12/24/08 -
Post by: Edward on December 28, 2008, 08:52:03 AM
I hope in 2009 that Maria organizes a large group of Aruban citizens to mass a protest for justice and freedom from the evil powers that control Aruba. The Real Aruban citizen is not in part with Any of Them and we all know that to be true.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #787 12/24/08 -
Post by: Edward on December 28, 2008, 09:05:39 AM
Oh great ..Now I have a pop up on scared monkeys for online gambling tournaments taking over my computer..
Joran and friends are hard at work I see.  ::MonkeyWink::
Has everyone here already joined the tournament ? I am sure the game is rigged. ::MonkeyDance::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #787 12/24/08 -
Post by: texasmom on December 28, 2008, 02:16:26 PM
Hope all you Monkey's had a wonderful Christmas.. ::MonkeyDance::

I agree with Janet at this point in time.Also.Remember Red said things are going on behind the scenes,as well as Rob has contact with Tj Ward.We'll have to await their word!Let's get back to The Persistence.Where are John Silvetti,Tim Trahan,as well as Schaeffer and everyone else that was involved on the 7th of Jan??

I had a great Christmas but soooo glad it is all over.  I thrive on routine ... structure.  I find the Christmas season ... for the most part ... so overwhelming at times.  Although ... hubby and I are going to venture out to do some visiting this afternoon ... the peace and quiet of the morning has been appreciated.

Keepthefaith ... I hope that your Christmas went well.

When Kyle Kingman's words posted at another site are considered ... I do not think the topic of the cage/trap should lose focus until the contents the ALE retrieved without a challenge by John S. are revealed.  The family may be working behind the scenes but ... the posts of Monkeys have meaning as well.  Scared Monkeys' forums are open ... open for ALL to read.  It only takes one person who has the ability to make a significant difference ....
Janet
12:30 PM PT



bump


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #787 12/24/08 -
Post by: Edward on December 28, 2008, 02:35:13 PM
(http://photos1.blogger.com/blogger/7457/2039/1600/one%20man%20with%20courage.jpg)


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #787 12/24/08 -
Post by: texasmom on December 28, 2008, 02:55:57 PM
"To know what is right and not to do it is the worst cowardice."
   -- Confucius


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #787 12/24/08 -
Post by: Sleuth on December 28, 2008, 02:58:09 PM
I don't know if this has been posted and forgive me if it is a repat but Monday December 29th, E! News Special on Natalee Holloway @ 10pm

I saw this advertised also - it is named "The Final Hours of Natalee Holloway".  It sounds simliar to the 20/20  show last spring called "20/20: The Final Hours of Natalee Holloway".  What struck me is that E! New indicates in their tags both online, on TV, and in the paper that Monday night's (10:00 PM EST)  is new.   It is also showing on Tuesday 12/30 at 11:00 am EST, Wesnesday 12/31 at 1:00 am EST, Saturday 1/3 at 6:00 pm EST, and Sunday 1/4 at 9:00 am EST.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #787 12/24/08 -
Post by: texasmom on December 28, 2008, 03:05:30 PM
I don't know if this has been posted and forgive me if it is a repat but Monday December 29th, E! News Special on Natalee Holloway @ 10pm

I saw this advertised also - it is named "The Final Hours of Natalee Holloway".  It sounds simliar to the 20/20  show last spring called "20/20: The Final Hours of Natalee Holloway".  What struck me is that E! New indicates in their tags both online, on TV, and in the paper that Monday night's (10:00 PM EST)  is new.   It is also showing on Tuesday 12/30 at 11:00 am EST, Wesnesday 12/31 at 1:00 am EST, Saturday 1/3 at 6:00 pm EST, and Sunday 1/4 at 9:00 am EST.


Thanks Sleuth!  Good to see you!   ::MonkeyCool::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #787 12/24/08 -
Post by: Sleuth on December 28, 2008, 03:21:31 PM
Good to see you also TM.  I hope your holidays were both happy and relaxed.

Integrity is doing the right thing, even when you know no one is watching.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #787 12/24/08 -
Post by: texasmom on December 28, 2008, 03:33:53 PM
Good to see you also TM.  I hope your holidays were both happy and relaxed.

Integrity is doing the right thing, even when you know no one is watching.

Thank you Sleuth, yes my holidays have been both; hope yours have been too!  So true about Integrity....


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #787 12/24/08 -
Post by: 2NJSons_Mom on December 28, 2008, 03:33:54 PM
I don't know if this has been posted and forgive me if it is a repat but Monday December 29th, E! News Special on Natalee Holloway @ 10pm

I saw this advertised also - it is named "The Final Hours of Natalee Holloway".  It sounds simliar to the 20/20  show last spring called "20/20: The Final Hours of Natalee Holloway".  What struck me is that E! New indicates in their tags both online, on TV, and in the paper that Monday night's (10:00 PM EST)  is new.   It is also showing on Tuesday 12/30 at 11:00 am EST, Wesnesday 12/31 at 1:00 am EST, Saturday 1/3 at 6:00 pm EST, and Sunday 1/4 at 9:00 am EST.


Hi, Sleuth.  Happy Holidays.  I just had to check this out for myself.  I found that E! is owned 50.1% by Comcast and 49.9% by Disney (20/20 ABC)  I guess we'll soon know if it's new. 


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #787 12/24/08 -
Post by: Nut44x4 on December 28, 2008, 04:11:43 PM
Top Five Sociopaths (some alleged) of 2008 (In no particular order)

Joran van der Sloot
Drew Peterson
O.J. Simpson
Casey Anthony
Gary Michael Hilton
http://blogs.discovery.com/criminal_report/2008/12/most-fascinatin.html

Just bringing this over from Caylee's thread post by boomonkey

This must be the 4th year in a row for Joran making the list  ::MonkeyHaHa::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #787 12/24/08 -
Post by: bastibro on December 28, 2008, 04:40:27 PM
Peter R. de Vries had a peak this year with his sensational broadcasts on Joran van der Sloot. But 2009 will probably be very different to unpack. According to Peter van der Hurk, winner of The Sixth Sense(TV program), next year there will be an attack on the crime reporter.

(http://i272.photobucket.com/albums/jj176/bastibro/Natalee/2240969157_67603d1573.jpg)

Van der Hurk made his prediction in Life & Cooking(TV program), where he did various predictions for the new year. In the spring of 2009, the paranormal gifted man will get his own TV program on RTL4.

An attack on Peter R. de Vries. Let`s hope that Van der Hurk is wrong.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #787 12/24/08 -
Post by: 2NJSons_Mom on December 28, 2008, 04:57:59 PM
Peter R. de Vries had a peak this year with his sensational broadcasts on Joran van der Sloot. But 2009 will probably be very different to unpack. According to Peter van der Hurk, winner of The Sixth Sense(TV program), next year there will be an attack on the crime reporter.

(http://i272.photobucket.com/albums/jj176/bastibro/Natalee/2240969157_67603d1573.jpg)

Van der Hurk made his prediction in Life & Cooking(TV program), where he did various predictions for the new year. In the spring of 2009, the paranormal gifted man will get his own TV program on RTL4.

An attack on Peter R. de Vries. Let`s hope that Van der Hurk is wrong.

Is this Van der Hurk a psychic?  What a creepy prediction, not to mention the power of suggestion.   ::MonkeyRoll::



Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #787 12/24/08 -
Post by: bastibro on December 28, 2008, 05:07:30 PM
Peter R. de Vries had a peak this year with his sensational broadcasts on Joran van der Sloot. But 2009 will probably be very different to unpack. According to Peter van der Hurk, winner of The Sixth Sense(TV program), next year there will be an attack on the crime reporter.

(http://i272.photobucket.com/albums/jj176/bastibro/Natalee/2240969157_67603d1573.jpg)

Van der Hurk made his prediction in Life & Cooking(TV program), where he did various predictions for the new year. In the spring of 2009, the paranormal gifted man will get his own TV program on RTL4.

An attack on Peter R. de Vries. Let`s hope that Van der Hurk is wrong.

Is this Van der Hurk a psychic?  What a creepy prediction, not to mention the power of suggestion.   ::MonkeyRoll::



Yeah you`re right, i never saw him and think i will keep it that way. IMO he`s a creap to.
I don`t think he`s a psychic. Or did you mean `psychiatric patient`?  ::MonkeyHaHa::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #787 12/24/08 -
Post by: San on December 28, 2008, 05:19:44 PM
Top Five Sociopaths (some alleged) of 2008 (In no particular order)

Joran van der Sloot
Drew Peterson  

O.J. Simpson
Casey Anthony
Gary Michael Hilton
http://blogs.discovery.com/criminal_report/2008/12/most-fascinatin.html

Just bringing this over from Caylee's thread post by boomonkey

This must be the 4th year in a row for Joran making the list  ::MonkeyHaHa::

Two sociopaths on the lose and still targeting women.  I hope 2009 puts an end to both one way or another.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #787 12/24/08 -
Post by: klaasend on December 28, 2008, 06:50:49 PM
FYI - no new documents filed...next hearing date Kalpoe vs. Dr. Phil:

Future Hearings
01/26/2009 at 08:30 am in department 69 at 111 North Hill Street, Los Angeles, CA 90012
Motion to Compel (Further Interrogatory Responsesand Production of Documents (4);2) Second Motion to Dismiss andRequest for Terminating Sanctions3) Case Management Conference)



Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #787 12/24/08 -
Post by: Sam on December 28, 2008, 07:34:05 PM
Oh great ..Now I have a pop up on scared monkeys for online gambling tournaments taking over my computer..
Joran and friends are hard at work I see.  ::MonkeyWink::
Has everyone here already joined the tournament ? I am sure the game is rigged. ::MonkeyDance::

I won it Edward and yes it was rigged.  ::MonkeyLaugh::

You need to do a download for a freebie adblocker plus to keep the popups from happening.

Klaas , I hope the judge just laughs at the Kalpoes. Actually I am wrong I would really like to see all those documents released. There has to be a reason for the ones Dr. Phil attorney's have requested.

I continue praying for Justice for Natalee and her family.

Sam


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #787 12/24/08 -
Post by: Edward on December 28, 2008, 08:54:16 PM
Well heck, If you are winning, I better let it pop up again, so I can get into the game. ::MonkeyWink::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #787 12/24/08 -
Post by: texasmom on December 28, 2008, 09:36:41 PM
12/27/2008 Confession Club

http://www.magic965.com/pictures/thumbnails.php?album=1334

(http://www.magic965.com/pictures/albums/DEC2008/271208%20CONFESSIONS1/Confessions_169.JPG)

(http://www.magic965.com/pictures/albums/DEC2008/271208%20CONFESSIONS/Confessions_54.JPG)


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #787 12/24/08 -
Post by: Magnolia on December 28, 2008, 10:07:50 PM
12/27/2008 Confession Club

http://www.magic965.com/pictures/thumbnails.php?album=1334

(http://www.magic965.com/pictures/albums/DEC2008/271208%20CONFESSIONS1/Confessions_169.JPG)

(http://www.magic965.com/pictures/albums/DEC2008/271208%20CONFESSIONS/Confessions_54.JPG)

I never realized that Val looked like Anita, but he does on those
pictures.  IMO


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #787 12/24/08 -
Post by: casa on December 28, 2008, 10:30:03 PM
Those are not the same guys in the two pictures.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #787 12/24/08 -
Post by: texasmom on December 28, 2008, 10:59:24 PM
Those are not the same guys in the two pictures.

Hi casa,
You're right Maki Wiggins is in the second pic.  I saw Magnolia's comment but thought she might have gone to the link.  There were three or four shots of Val there; I only posted one of them.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #787 12/24/08 -
Post by: texasmom on December 28, 2008, 11:15:52 PM
http://awemainta.com/home/

12/29/2008 Awe Mainta Front Page


(http://i21.photobucket.com/albums/b258/texasmom55/JVDS/12292008AweMaintaFP.jpg)

Papiamentu translation:

joran at laos

all cos is indica cu joran van der sloot is huyendo p’e arm largo of husticia. assure cu now the will owing to compronde cu husticia at aruba, cual past owing to come is burla, have pruebanan new contra of his person y cu debi ne ultimo here not owing to close the caso contra of dje at aruba. if the not had nothing of sconde, then the will not have to owing to stay huy of one country for another.

12/29/2008 Awe Mainta Page 4

(http://i21.photobucket.com/albums/b258/texasmom55/JVDS/12292008AweMaintaPg4.jpg)

Papiamentu translation:

monday 29 of december 2008 awemainta pg 4 local

his pelicula is yegando his end...... joran van der sloot, one biahero much caro but is that is pay his gastunan pe? amsterdam/laos - all cos is indica cu joran van der sloot is huyendo p’e arm largo of husticia. assure cu now the will owing to compronde cu husticia at aruba, cual past owing to come is burla, have pruebanan new contra of his person y cu debi ne ultimo here not owing to close the caso contra of dje at aruba. if the not had nothing of sconde, then the will not have to owing to stay huy of one country for another. after of hazaña they at thailand now turistanan dutch european owing to come señala joran van der sloot at laos. this is just one day first cu pasco. laos is town of republica democratico laos in continente of asia y is rondona for paisnan as thailand, china, cambodja y vietnam. joran van der sloot after of was live in one villa much riante at tailandia owing to huy for dje country here after cu once more the reportero investigativo for casonan criminal peter rudolf de vries owing to come graba filmacionnan scondi of dje where the wanted owing to sell some lady because; prostituta cu one man dutch. esnan cu owing to raporta at the netherlands of come across cu joran is tell cu they owing to come strike in dje in one bar in the town upstairs menciona. is deal of one bar much conoci for turistanan y is take away of name bucks bar in the district vang vieng. but con come joran van der sloot have so tanto coin? past owing to bandona aruba after of blunder cu owing to being comete in investigacion in his contra cu yudanza of several amigo of the father y autoridadnan of om, of acuerdo cu the own minister of husticia, rudy croes, that owing to let haci one investigacion. joran have to owing to come study at the netherlands, but owing to come is busca as of sell drugs y arise one plantacion of marihuana together cu patrick van eem. this was his desire. play poker at big y smoke marihuana all day. this do not study. his comportacion is uno simplemente criminal y have to is being instrui for others, already cu the is know good con for sconde till aworaki. but of the know ey tampoko the do not. this will nifica cu his pelicula one hour for another can termina y the screen will stay dark pe because; his family cu owing to malcri’e y acepta his bagamunderianan till cu aworaki.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #787 12/24/08 -
Post by: texasmom on December 28, 2008, 11:37:59 PM
http://awemainta.com/home/

12/29/2008 Awe Mainta Pg 8

(http://i21.photobucket.com/albums/b258/texasmom55/Misc%20News%204/12292008AweMaintaPg8.jpg)

Papiamentu translation:

tourist owing to accidenta on sea cu tube of watersport yesterday afternoon, strand politie owing to being send n’e beach near of marriott, for one caso of one accidente cu had on sea. the first informe achieve is, cu the tourist will was on one of the tube of one compania of watersport y for one or another motibo owing to hay’e in one accidente. the have to owing to being take away hospital for remark. kico exactly owing to sosode, do not mucho cla for we.



Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #787 12/24/08 -
Post by: texasmom on December 29, 2008, 12:05:47 AM
http://awemainta.com/home/

12/29/2008 Awe Mainta Page 4

(http://i21.photobucket.com/albums/b258/texasmom55/JVDS/12292008AweMaintaPg4.jpg)

Papiamentu translation:

monday 29 of december 2008 awemainta pg 4 local

his pelicula is yegando his end...... joran van der sloot, one biahero much caro but is that is pay his gastunan pe? amsterdam/laos - all cos is indica cu joran van der sloot is huyendo p’e arm largo of husticia. assure cu now the will owing to compronde cu husticia at aruba, cual past owing to come is burla, have pruebanan new contra of his person y cu debi ne ultimo here not owing to close the caso contra of dje at aruba. if the not had nothing of sconde, then the will not have to owing to stay huy of one country for another. after of hazaña they at thailand now turistanan dutch european owing to come señala joran van der sloot at laos. this is just one day first cu pasco. laos is town of republica democratico laos in continente of asia y is rondona for paisnan as thailand, china, cambodja y vietnam. joran van der sloot after of was live in one villa much riante at tailandia owing to huy for dje country here after cu once more the reportero investigativo for casonan criminal peter rudolf de vries owing to come graba filmacionnan scondi of dje where the wanted owing to sell some lady because; prostituta cu one man dutch. esnan cu owing to raporta at the netherlands of come across cu joran is tell cu they owing to come strike in dje in one bar in the town upstairs menciona. is deal of one bar much conoci for turistanan y is take away of name bucks bar in the district vang vieng. but con come joran van der sloot have so tanto coin? past owing to bandona aruba after of blunder cu owing to being comete in investigacion in his contra cu yudanza of several amigo of the father y autoridadnan of om, of acuerdo cu the own minister of husticia, rudy croes, that owing to let haci one investigacion. joran have to owing to come study at the netherlands, but owing to come is busca as of sell drugs y arise one plantacion of marihuana together cu patrick van eem. this was his desire. play poker at big y smoke marihuana all day. this do not study. his comportacion is uno simplemente criminal y have to is being instrui for others, already cu the is know good con for sconde till aworaki. but of the know ey tampoko the do not. this will nifica cu his pelicula one hour for another can termina y the screen will stay dark pe because; his family cu owing to malcri’e y acepta his bagamunderianan till cu aworaki.
[/quote]


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #787 12/24/08 -
Post by: BUCKSHOT on December 29, 2008, 01:07:06 AM
justice is still receiving new tips

(http://www.revu.nl/pix/artikel/12763_main.jpg)

The Public Prosecutor (OM) hopes to Aruba in February to decide whether Joran van der Sloot will be prosecuted in the case of Natalee Holloway. It was envisaged that this decision around Christmas was already taken, but the Algemeen Dagblad reported that justice is still receiving new tips.

Thanks to the great media attention for the disappearance of Natalee was given the Dutch-Aruban investigators still regularly with new tips. Only last month said a friend of Joran that he had told her that his father knew of the case. It was heard by the search.

"In order to examine the tips we need more time," said a spokesperson for the PPS to the newspaper about the decision of the head officer in February at knot by the heels. "We think than enough to have a decision to take on further prosecutions."

So far into the case to be reaching such an elementary conclusion that Paulus "knew of the case."
Which Einstein finally figured this one out ????


 ::MonkeyConfused::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #787 12/24/08 -
Post by: texasmom on December 29, 2008, 02:13:20 AM
Hi Cageman,
I hope you will give us your impression of the Awe Mainta articles about Joran if you have the time.  Thank you in advance!  As always the translation tools leave much to be desired.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #787 12/24/08 -
Post by: texasmom on December 29, 2008, 02:36:09 AM
I came across this article tonight, I don't remember it being posted recently in reference to the Persistence search for Natalee; if it has I apologize.  There is not a date I can find for when it was published, but I think it must have been from Nov. 2007.

http://www.katc.com/Global/story.asp?S=7428547

Crews Leave Acadiana To Search For Natalee Holloway
 
David D'Aquin
 
(KATC)-- An international story takes on an Acadiana angle Thursday. Crews from Acadiana are on their way to Aruba to help in the search for Natalee Holloway. Holloway has been missing for two and a half years.

In St. Martin Parish Thursday-- Holloway's father who said he is excited about the search. He went on further, and said he is looking for closure. That "closure" wouldn't be possible without the help of strangers.

"We just didn't have the capabilities," said Dave Holloway, "Louis Shaefer found out about it and said, 'i've got the ability.' I've got the expertise. I've got the equipment, and I can do the job."

Louis Shaefer is retired after working off shore for more than 40 years. He's paying for the million dollar project.

"I'm just lucky that I'm at the right place at the right time," said Shaefer.

"we're just so thankful that he's got a big heart and is willing to do that," said Holloway.

The ship is the research vessel "Persistance," owned by Marine Services in Lafayette. It will take about seven days to make the journey from the Port of Iberia to Aruba.

"i've got a feeling that if she's in the ocean, these gusy are going to find her," said Holloway, who will be staying in U.S. while crews search for his daughter. He said, he knows his daughter is dead, and doesn't want to be there when she is found, "the FBI told us that Natalee's not with us anymore. And, as a parent, you always hope that wasn't the case. But, in reality, we know that already."





Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #787 12/24/08 -
Post by: Cageman on December 29, 2008, 06:47:39 AM
Hi Cageman,
I hope you will give us your impression of the Awe Mainta articles about Joran if you have the time.  Thank you in advance!  As always the translation tools leave much to be desired.
Well, the article states that Joran is on the run to escape for the long arms of justice. It also states that if he hasn't done anything wrong there should be no necessity to run. He left Aruba after some blunders during the investigation against him and after some help of some friends of his father. After some "heroic" actions in Thailand, tourists have seen him now in Laos. Probably because he has been nailed again by the crime-reporter P.R de Vries.
Furthermore the article wonders how Joran gets money. He should be studying in Holland but instead he is selling drugs and setting up a marihuana-plantation. He also is gambling playing poker. His behaviour is criminal-like. The writer expects that some day the curtain will fall for Joran and his family.

(Very loose translation!)

Jan Willem


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #787 12/24/08 -
Post by: San on December 29, 2008, 07:43:55 AM
Hi Cageman,
I hope you will give us your impression of the Awe Mainta articles about Joran if you have the time.  Thank you in advance!  As always the translation tools leave much to be desired.
Well, the article states that Joran is on the run to escape for the long arms of justice. It also states that if he hasn't done anything wrong there should be no necessity to run. He left Aruba after some blunders during the investigation against him and after some help of some friends of his father. After some "heroic" actions in Thailand, tourists have seen him now in Laos. Probably because he has been nailed again by the crime-reporter P.R de Vries.
Furthermore the article wonders how Joran gets money. He should be studying in Holland but instead he is selling drugs and setting up a marihuana-plantation. He also is gambling playing poker. His behaviour is criminal-like. The writer expects that some day the curtain will fall for Joran and his family.

(Very loose translation!)

Jan Willem

Thank you for the translation.

So now he is setting up a marihuana plantation.  This is amazing.  Runs from one country to another thinking of all these new illegal business transactions.  Like father like son.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #787 12/24/08 -
Post by: sharon on December 29, 2008, 07:52:13 AM
Hi Cageman,
I hope you will give us your impression of the Awe Mainta articles about Joran if you have the time.  Thank you in advance!  As always the translation tools leave much to be desired.
Well, the article states that Joran is on the run to escape for the long arms of justice. It also states that if he hasn't done anything wrong there should be no necessity to run. He left Aruba after some blunders during the investigation against him and after some help of some friends of his father. After some "heroic" actions in Thailand, tourists have seen him now in Laos. Probably because he has been nailed again by the crime-reporter P.R de Vries.
Furthermore the article wonders how Joran gets money. He should be studying in Holland but instead he is selling drugs and setting up a marihuana-plantation. He also is gambling playing poker. His behaviour is criminal-like. The writer expects that some day the curtain will fall for Joran and his family.

(Very loose translation!)

Jan Willem

Thank you for the translation.

So now he is setting up a marihuana plantation.  This is amazing.  Runs from one country to another thinking of all these new illegal business transactions.  Like father like son.

Apparently, they share the same 'protection' agency  ::MonkeyWink::

If it were you or I, or any of the monkeys -- and it was this public -- we'd be in jail.

I hope your holidays were beautiful San -- warmest wishes for the upcoming new year.

Justice for Natalee


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #787 12/24/08 -
Post by: San on December 29, 2008, 10:53:55 AM
Hi Cageman,
I hope you will give us your impression of the Awe Mainta articles about Joran if you have the time.  Thank you in advance!  As always the translation tools leave much to be desired.
Well, the article states that Joran is on the run to escape for the long arms of justice. It also states that if he hasn't done anything wrong there should be no necessity to run. He left Aruba after some blunders during the investigation against him and after some help of some friends of his father. After some "heroic" actions in Thailand, tourists have seen him now in Laos. Probably because he has been nailed again by the crime-reporter P.R de Vries.
Furthermore the article wonders how Joran gets money. He should be studying in Holland but instead he is selling drugs and setting up a marihuana-plantation. He also is gambling playing poker. His behaviour is criminal-like. The writer expects that some day the curtain will fall for Joran and his family.

(Very loose translation!)

Jan Willem

Thank you for the translation.

So now he is setting up a marihuana plantation.  This is amazing.  Runs from one country to another thinking of all these new illegal business transactions.  Like father like son.

Apparently, they share the same 'protection' agency  ::MonkeyWink::

If it were you or I, or any of the monkeys -- and it was this public -- we'd be in jail.

I hope your holidays were beautiful San -- warmest wishes for the upcoming new year.

Justice for Natalee

I agree that we would all be in jail.  How society lets this monster roam the streets boggles my mind.

Happy Holidays to you and your family.



Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #787 12/24/08 -
Post by: Cageman on December 29, 2008, 11:05:23 AM
Before people jump to soon into conclusions, literally the article states he is looking for ways for selling drugs en setting up a marihuana-plantation. I should have made a more proper translation. Remember that I have to make a double translation: first from Papiamento to Dutch and than to English.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #787 12/24/08 -
Post by: San on December 29, 2008, 11:18:30 AM
Before people jump to soon into conclusions, literally the article states he is looking for ways for selling drugs en setting up a marihuana-plantation. I should have made a more proper translation. Remember that I have to make a double translation: first from Papiamento to Dutch and than to English.

I understand that but he is still looking for ways to do illegal activities.  Nothing he does is legal.  He has been like this since he was in his teens.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #787 12/24/08 -
Post by: texasmom on December 29, 2008, 11:28:57 AM
Hi Cageman,
I hope you will give us your impression of the Awe Mainta articles about Joran if you have the time.  Thank you in advance!  As always the translation tools leave much to be desired.
Well, the article states that Joran is on the run to escape for the long arms of justice. It also states that if he hasn't done anything wrong there should be no necessity to run. He left Aruba after some blunders during the investigation against him and after some help of some friends of his father. After some "heroic" actions in Thailand, tourists have seen him now in Laos. Probably because he has been nailed again by the crime-reporter P.R de Vries.
Furthermore the article wonders how Joran gets money. He should be studying in Holland but instead he is selling drugs and setting up a marihuana-plantation. He also is gambling playing poker. His behaviour is criminal-like. The writer expects that some day the curtain will fall for Joran and his family.

(Very loose translation!)

Jan Willem

Thank you Cageman!   ::MonkeyCool::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #787 12/24/08 -
Post by: 2NJSons_Mom on December 29, 2008, 12:01:49 PM
Before people jump to soon into conclusions, literally the article states he is looking for ways for selling drugs en setting up a marihuana-plantation. I should have made a more proper translation. Remember that I have to make a double translation: first from Papiamento to Dutch and than to English.

I understand that but he is still looking for ways to do illegal activities.  Nothing he does is legal.  He has been like this since he was in his teens.

Yes, what a fine, upstanding sporter he is.   ::MonkeyRoll::

Cageman, your translation is much appreciated.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #787 12/24/08 -
Post by: Keepthefaith on December 29, 2008, 01:52:13 PM
2009 is upon us and i'm still keeping the faith that there are some secret witnesses..........No.I'm not holding my breath. ::MonkeyDance::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #787 12/24/08 -
Post by: San on December 29, 2008, 01:57:34 PM
2009 is upon us and i'm still keeping the faith that there are some secret witnesses..........No.I'm not holding my breath. ::MonkeyDance::

After 3 1/2 years I have learned never to hold my breath concerning this case.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #787 12/24/08 -
Post by: texasmom on December 29, 2008, 02:10:55 PM
http://www.amigoe.com/artman/publish/artikel_50958.php

Google translation:

(http://i21.photobucket.com/albums/b258/texasmom55/Misc%20News%204/12292008Amigoe.jpg)


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #787 12/24/08 -
Post by: bleachedblack on December 29, 2008, 02:20:05 PM
Hi Cageman,
I hope you will give us your impression of the Awe Mainta articles about Joran if you have the time.  Thank you in advance!  As always the translation tools leave much to be desired.
Well, the article states that Joran is on the run to escape for the long arms of justice. It also states that if he hasn't done anything wrong there should be no necessity to run. He left Aruba after some blunders during the investigation against him and after some help of some friends of his father. After some "heroic" actions in Thailand, tourists have seen him now in Laos. Probably because he has been nailed again by the crime-reporter P.R de Vries.
Furthermore the article wonders how Joran gets money. He should be studying in Holland but instead he is selling drugs and setting up a marihuana-plantation. He also is gambling playing poker. His behaviour is criminal-like. The writer expects that some day the curtain will fall for Joran and his family.

(Very loose translation!)

Jan Willem

Thank you for the translation.

So now he is setting up a marihuana plantation.  This is amazing.  Runs from one country to another thinking of all these new illegal business transactions.  Like father like son.

Maybe he picked up some agricultural tips from LVR.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #787 12/24/08 -
Post by: 2NJSons_Mom on December 29, 2008, 02:22:42 PM
http://www.amigoe.com/artman/publish/artikel_50958.php

Google translation:

(http://i21.photobucket.com/albums/b258/texasmom55/Misc%20News%204/12292008Amigoe.jpg)

 ::MonkeyWink::  The following was not in my every day vocabulary, so I looked it up.

plen⋅i⋅po⋅ten⋅ti⋅ar⋅y   /ˌplɛnəpəˈtɛnʃiˌɛri, -ʃəri/ Show Spelled Pronunciation  [plen-uh-puh-ten-shee-er-ee, -shuh-ree] Show IPA Pronunciation 
noun, plural -ar⋅ies, adjective
–noun 1. a person, esp. a diplomatic agent, invested with full power or authority to transact business on behalf of another.
–adjective 2. invested with full power or authority, as a diplomatic agent.
3. conferring or bestowing full power, as a commission.
4. absolute or full, as power.


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Origin:
1635–45; < ML plēnipotentiārius. See plenipotent, -i-, -ary
Dictionary.com Unabridged (v 1.1)
Based on the Random House Unabridged Dictionary, © Random House, Inc. 2006.
Cite This Source


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #787 12/24/08 -
Post by: WhiskeyGirl on December 29, 2008, 02:40:08 PM
2009 is upon us and i'm still keeping the faith that there are some secret witnesses..........No.I'm not holding my breath. ::MonkeyDance::

After 3 1/2 years I have learned never to hold my breath concerning this case.

I would add..."hold back my vomit".  May just be me.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #787 12/24/08 -
Post by: WhiskeyGirl on December 29, 2008, 02:46:51 PM
Hi Cageman,
I hope you will give us your impression of the Awe Mainta articles about Joran if you have the time.  Thank you in advance!  As always the translation tools leave much to be desired.
Well, the article states that Joran is on the run to escape for the long arms of justice. It also states that if he hasn't done anything wrong there should be no necessity to run. He left Aruba after some blunders during the investigation against him and after some help of some friends of his father. After some "heroic" actions in Thailand, tourists have seen him now in Laos. Probably because he has been nailed again by the crime-reporter P.R de Vries.
Furthermore the article wonders how Joran gets money. He should be studying in Holland but instead he is selling drugs and setting up a marihuana-plantation. He also is gambling playing poker. His behaviour is criminal-like. The writer expects that some day the curtain will fall for Joran and his family.

(Very loose translation!)

Jan Willem

Thank you for the translation.

So now he is setting up a marihuana plantation.  This is amazing.  Runs from one country to another thinking of all these new illegal business transactions.  Like father like son.

I would imagine that he may be working on his education through distance learning.  Maybe internet courses, correspondence courses, or mail order diploma?  Maybe the plantation is an apprenticeship?  Maybe he got a micro-loan for his startup?  OJT?

jmho


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #787 12/24/08 -
Post by: Tamikosmom on December 29, 2008, 02:49:29 PM
Those who were part of the coverup regarding the happenings on the morning of May 30, 2005 ... the morning when an American citizen went missing and was never seen again ... whisked away the contents of the cage/trap discovered as a result of the Persistence undertaking ... whisked away the contents of the cage/trap without so much of a challenge by the John Silvetti ... John Silvetti  who was in charge of the Persistence undertaking.

Kyle Kingman has shared through the leaked ROV images as well as his own words that John Silvetti possessed underlying motives in regards to the chain of custody of the contents of the trap/cage to the enemy ... underlying motives that had nothing to do with justice for Natalee Holloway or a measure of closure for a long-suffering family ... motives that were self-serving.

Kyle Kingman could possibly be the hero who Beth Holloway felt in her heart would eventually emerge.

If Kyle would expose his observations/concerns/suspicions while he was employed in a professional capacity on board the Persistence undertaking concerning the John Silvetti/ALE connection ... pressure could be brought upon the Aruban "powers that be" regarding the contents of the trap/cage.

If Kyle were to step forward and do right because it is right ... if this young man would reveal ALL to the FBI and the family while aware that in all probability there will be personal consequences ...

Janet

+++++

OPRAH WINFREY SHOW
January 27, 2008


BETH HOLLOWAY: ... we've never really relied on an investigative approach to find an answer to Natalee. I think what we've relied on more heavily is that at any given moment something unexpected could happen and we really feel anyone could talk at any moment.
 
http://www2.oprah.com/world/politics/slide/20080116/politics_284_203.jhtml


KYLE KINGMAN'S POSTS SUBMITED TO A PRIVATE FORUM

Kyle: John is not a believer in the trap. He took ALE's word as gospel that it wasn't case related, yet never studied the videos or bothered to inquire further. He had plans on doing business with Aruba and in S. America and he didn't want to hurt any feelings by talks hinting at lack of complete trust and friendship.

Kyle: Notice the end of the skirt is an identical match to the 90 degree angle in the sand. I believe her left arm was outstretched with her legs slightly bent. I did not edit the legs. I believe the tarp was placed over her and tucked around her, or perhaps tied down. I believe there are several rocks laying on the sand which were placed on the tarp, or inside the tarp over her body which explains their unusual location. Either way, the proportions appear promising.

Kyle: I took the proportions of the body form from the head, to shoulder, to a 90 degree angle which I believed to be the hem line of Natalee's skirt. I then took those proportions and matched them to the photo of Natalee with what she was last seen wearing. The proportions matched within an inch from head, to shoulder, to skirt line. Based on this comparison and with what we believed we saw in the Dec 29th video, Tim Miller contacted the family and told them the 99.9% comment. I told Tim not to do anything until we have forensic results back after the site is processed. Jan 7th we sampled the contents and in my opinion we found the skirt under the sand along with the other items The blue fabric was found right where the skirt is pictured. If it isn't her, it will forever haunt me as a major cosmic WTF.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #787 12/24/08 -
Post by: Tamikosmom on December 29, 2008, 03:13:04 PM
Dear Kyle

You have a precious little daughter.  Please attempt to put yourself in the place of Natalee Holloway's parents and ... ask yourself what your reponse would have been ...  regarding the happenings encompassing the Persistence undertaking ... once you had set foot on American soil.

Would you have been submitting posts to forums expressing your concerns regarding your observations while on board the Persistence?  Would you be contacting major networks attempting to make a deal? 

Kyle ... according to Edlridge Cleaver ... you can either be part of the solution or part of the problem.

Which is it?

The family deserve to know IF their beloved Natalee's remains had been placed in that trap/cage.

In His Holy Name,

Janet


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #787 12/24/08 -
Post by: texasmom on December 29, 2008, 03:17:46 PM
I came across this article tonight, I don't remember it being posted recently in reference to the Persistence search for Natalee; if it has I apologize.  There is not a date I can find for when it was published, but I think it must have been from Nov. 2007.

http://www.katc.com/Global/story.asp?S=7428547

Crews Leave Acadiana To Search For Natalee Holloway
 
David D'Aquin
 
(KATC)-- An international story takes on an Acadiana angle Thursday. Crews from Acadiana are on their way to Aruba to help in the search for Natalee Holloway. Holloway has been missing for two and a half years.

In St. Martin Parish Thursday-- Holloway's father who said he is excited about the search. He went on further, and said he is looking for closure. That "closure" wouldn't be possible without the help of strangers.

"We just didn't have the capabilities," said Dave Holloway, "Louis Shaefer found out about it and said, 'i've got the ability.' I've got the expertise. I've got the equipment, and I can do the job."

Louis Shaefer is retired after working off shore for more than 40 years. He's paying for the million dollar project.

"I'm just lucky that I'm at the right place at the right time," said Shaefer.

"we're just so thankful that he's got a big heart and is willing to do that," said Holloway.

The ship is the research vessel "Persistance," owned by Marine Services in Lafayette. It will take about seven days to make the journey from the Port of Iberia to Aruba.

"i've got a feeling that if she's in the ocean, these guys are going to find her," said Holloway, who will be staying in U.S. while crews search for his daughter. He said, he knows his daughter is dead, and doesn't want to be there when she is found, "the FBI told us that Natalee's not with us anymore. And, as a parent, you always hope that wasn't the case. But, in reality, we know that already."



Just like Dave Holloway, we all trusted them to do the right thing if and when they found her!   ::MonkeyNoNo::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #787 12/24/08 -
Post by: Tamikosmom on December 29, 2008, 03:28:07 PM
I came across this article tonight, I don't remember it being posted recently in reference to the Persistence search for Natalee; if it has I apologize.  There is not a date I can find for when it was published, but I think it must have been from Nov. 2007.

http://www.katc.com/Global/story.asp?S=7428547

Crews Leave Acadiana To Search For Natalee Holloway
 
David D'Aquin
 
(KATC)-- An international story takes on an Acadiana angle Thursday. Crews from Acadiana are on their way to Aruba to help in the search for Natalee Holloway. Holloway has been missing for two and a half years.

In St. Martin Parish Thursday-- Holloway's father who said he is excited about the search. He went on further, and said he is looking for closure. That "closure" wouldn't be possible without the help of strangers.

"We just didn't have the capabilities," said Dave Holloway, "Louis Shaefer found out about it and said, 'i've got the ability.' I've got the expertise. I've got the equipment, and I can do the job."

Louis Shaefer is retired after working off shore for more than 40 years. He's paying for the million dollar project.

"I'm just lucky that I'm at the right place at the right time," said Shaefer.

"we're just so thankful that he's got a big heart and is willing to do that," said Holloway.

The ship is the research vessel "Persistance," owned by Marine Services in Lafayette. It will take about seven days to make the journey from the Port of Iberia to Aruba.

"i've got a feeling that if she's in the ocean, these guys are going to find her," said Holloway, who will be staying in U.S. while crews search for his daughter. He said, he knows his daughter is dead, and doesn't want to be there when she is found, "the FBI told us that Natalee's not with us anymore. And, as a parent, you always hope that wasn't the case. But, in reality, we know that already."



Just like Dave Holloway, we all trusted them to do the right thing if and when they found her!   ::MonkeyNoNo::


Thanks texasmom.

The family of Natalee Holloway has no idea that the "game was fixed." and ... those who sacrificially donated to the Persistence undertaking had no idea that it was nothing but a hoax and ... that they were being scammed.

Janet
________

BROTHER OF BETH HOLLOWAY'S POST TO THE SCARED MONKEYS FORUM

Private Eye:
"If I understood Kyle correctly, and that would be that the Arubans retrieved and possessed all finds, not sharing anything with the crew, then that effort was a waste of time and effort. The only thing it could have accomplished was to locate additional evidence for the Arubans to destroy. ... The effort was superb, but the game was fixed."


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #787 12/24/08 -
Post by: sharon on December 29, 2008, 03:30:56 PM
I came across this article tonight, I don't remember it being posted recently in reference to the Persistence search for Natalee; if it has I apologize.  There is not a date I can find for when it was published, but I think it must have been from Nov. 2007.

http://www.katc.com/Global/story.asp?S=7428547

Crews Leave Acadiana To Search For Natalee Holloway
 
David D'Aquin
 
(KATC)-- An international story takes on an Acadiana angle Thursday. Crews from Acadiana are on their way to Aruba to help in the search for Natalee Holloway. Holloway has been missing for two and a half years.

In St. Martin Parish Thursday-- Holloway's father who said he is excited about the search. He went on further, and said he is looking for closure. That "closure" wouldn't be possible without the help of strangers.

"We just didn't have the capabilities," said Dave Holloway, "Louis Shaefer found out about it and said, 'i've got the ability.' I've got the expertise. I've got the equipment, and I can do the job."

Louis Shaefer is retired after working off shore for more than 40 years. He's paying for the million dollar project.

"I'm just lucky that I'm at the right place at the right time," said Shaefer.

"we're just so thankful that he's got a big heart and is willing to do that," said Holloway.

The ship is the research vessel "Persistance," owned by Marine Services in Lafayette. It will take about seven days to make the journey from the Port of Iberia to Aruba.

"i've got a feeling that if she's in the ocean, these guys are going to find her," said Holloway, who will be staying in U.S. while crews search for his daughter. He said, he knows his daughter is dead, and doesn't want to be there when she is found, "the FBI told us that Natalee's not with us anymore. And, as a parent, you always hope that wasn't the case. But, in reality, we know that already."



Just like Dave Holloway, we all trusted them to do the right thing if and when they found her!   ::MonkeyNoNo::



"We just didn't have the capabilities," said Dave Holloway, "Louis Shaefer found out about it and said, 'i've got the ability.' I've got the expertise. I've got the equipment, and I can do the job."

Louis Shaefer is retired after working off shore for more than 40 years. He's paying for the million dollar project.

"I'm just lucky that I'm at the right place at the right time," said Shaefer.


This has bothered me since reading it a year ago.

I'm still very curious as to how he got to be so 'lucky'

 ::MonkeyConfused:: ::MonkeyConfused::



Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #787 12/24/08 -
Post by: texasmom on December 29, 2008, 03:36:54 PM
I came across this article tonight, I don't remember it being posted recently in reference to the Persistence search for Natalee; if it has I apologize.  There is not a date I can find for when it was published, but I think it must have been from Nov. 2007.

http://www.katc.com/Global/story.asp?S=7428547

Crews Leave Acadiana To Search For Natalee Holloway
 
David D'Aquin
 
(KATC)-- An international story takes on an Acadiana angle Thursday. Crews from Acadiana are on their way to Aruba to help in the search for Natalee Holloway. Holloway has been missing for two and a half years.

In St. Martin Parish Thursday-- Holloway's father who said he is excited about the search. He went on further, and said he is looking for closure. That "closure" wouldn't be possible without the help of strangers.

"We just didn't have the capabilities," said Dave Holloway, "Louis Shaefer found out about it and said, 'i've got the ability.' I've got the expertise. I've got the equipment, and I can do the job."

Louis Shaefer is retired after working off shore for more than 40 years. He's paying for the million dollar project.

"I'm just lucky that I'm at the right place at the right time," said Shaefer.

"we're just so thankful that he's got a big heart and is willing to do that," said Holloway.

The ship is the research vessel "Persistance," owned by Marine Services in Lafayette. It will take about seven days to make the journey from the Port of Iberia to Aruba.

"i've got a feeling that if she's in the ocean, these guys are going to find her," said Holloway, who will be staying in U.S. while crews search for his daughter. He said, he knows his daughter is dead, and doesn't want to be there when she is found, "the FBI told us that Natalee's not with us anymore. And, as a parent, you always hope that wasn't the case. But, in reality, we know that already."



Just like Dave Holloway, we all trusted them to do the right thing if and when they found her!   ::MonkeyNoNo::



"We just didn't have the capabilities," said Dave Holloway, "Louis Shaefer found out about it and said, 'i've got the ability.' I've got the expertise. I've got the equipment, and I can do the job."

Louis Shaefer is retired after working off shore for more than 40 years. He's paying for the million dollar project.

"I'm just lucky that I'm at the right place at the right time," said Shaefer.


This has bothered me since reading it a year ago.

I'm still very curious as to how he got to be so 'lucky'

 ::MonkeyConfused:: ::MonkeyConfused::



I don't remember reading it then, but it is really bothering me now; and I want to know the answer to that too!   ::MonkeyNoNo::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #787 12/24/08 -
Post by: Tamikosmom on December 29, 2008, 03:37:51 PM
2009 is upon us and i'm still keeping the faith that there are some secret witnesses..........No.I'm not holding my breath. ::MonkeyDance::

Keepthefaith ... witnesses have come and gone since the getgo but ....

 ::MonkeyNoNo::

Janet

+++++


THE GARDENER

Carlos Ramos - Gardener
Court Hearing
August 15, 2005


I have seen the car in the morning of 30 May of Sunday on Monday. I went to Lorena on Monday night, then I went to work, told that I saw a car standing along the way when I drove along there. I cannot remember on which day I saw the photograph of the persons in the newspaper. The photograph, which the police force showed me, is the same photograph as the photograph that appeared in the Diario. You ask me how can I know or recognize the persons from the photograph in the newspaper or that I had seen that night. The first time then I saw the photograph in the Diario I had been astonished and I said that to colleagues. You represent me that I have explained that I have recognized the persons from their construction and mail hour. You ask me if I could see from my position in the car. My position was a bit is higher, in the turning I had drive concerning a sand hill as a result of which my position was a bit slanted. As a result, I could look at in the car. I have recognized the car from the rims. Also to the color and the transparent squares. You ask me if I can designate the persons, which sat in the car. Yes.

http://scaredmonkeys.net/index.php?topic=271.msg41646;topicseen#msg41646


Gardener - Carlos Alberto Penata Ramos
Court Testimony
August 15, 2005

I looked and saw that on my watch it was at 02:30. For 03.00 I was at my work. I’m not sure exactly how precise it is. When I encountered the car in question, it was on that dirt road. I had slowed down to drive past there. The lights of my car "from" shining on that car. The person beside the driver, kept its hand for its head and face. I saw that the driver slid a bit to the back.

http://scaredmonkeys.net/index.php?topic=271.msg41646;topicseen#msg41646


THE GARDENER - JOSSY MANSUR

NANCY GRACE
Nancy Grace for July 26, 2005, CNNHN
Aired July 26, 2005 - 20:00:00 ET


MANSUR: Because they were trying to hide their faces at that the hour, because we have to remember that the two Kalpoe brothers and Joran held on to the statement that they dropped Joran off at the beach and then went home. But here we have someone that says categorically that they did not go home, they were in the car with Joran. Joran was sitting in the driver`s seat.

http://transcripts.cnn.com/TRANSCRIPTS/0507/26/ng.01.html


THE GARDENER - BETH HOLLOWAY

CNN LARRY KING LIVE
Update on Natalee Holloway Investigation
Aired February 23, 2006 - 21:00 ET


BETH HOLLOWAY TWITTY: ... Deepak panicked. He panicked when the gardener gave that testimony. That very afternoon, he called an Aruban girl to help him establish an alibi. She, in turn, panicked. She called FBI. She dialed the 1-877-NATALEE number and told them that she did not want to be involved in this.

http://transcripts.cnn.com/TRANSCRIPTS/0602/23/lkl.01.html


THE GARDENER - DAVE HOLLOWAY

Hannity & Colmes
August 10, 2005


HOLLOWAY: Seems like every time someone speaks out or comes forward. Just like the gardener, he is supposed to appear in court Thursday then be immediately deported. That is the work of the defense of course. Some witnesses may be scared to come forward for fear of repercussions.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #787 12/24/08 -
Post by: bastibro on December 29, 2008, 03:42:11 PM
I have calculated that the skull in the cage is about 4.5 inches (11.4 cm) long.
That seems to me very small for a skull.

The average Skull Length of a human is 8.45 inches (21.5cm).


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #787 12/24/08 -
Post by: hotping on December 29, 2008, 03:45:32 PM
Those who were part of the coverup regarding the happenings on the morning of May 30, 2005 ... the morning when an American citizen went missing and was never seen again ... whisked away the contents of the cage/trap discovered as a result of the Persistence undertaking ... whisked away the contents of the cage/trap without so much of a challenge by the John Silvetti ... John Silvetti  who was in charge of the Persistence undertaking.

Kyle Kingman has shared through the leaked ROV images as well as his own words that John Silvetti possessed underlying motives in regards to the chain of custody of the contents of the trap/cage to the enemy ... underlying motives that had nothing to do with justice for Natalee Holloway or a measure of closure for a long-suffering family ... motives that were self-serving.

Kyle Kingman could possibly be the hero who Beth Holloway felt in her heart would eventually emerge.

If Kyle would expose his observations/concerns/suspicions while he was employed in a professional capacity on board the Persistence undertaking concerning the John Silvetti/ALE connection ... pressure could be brought upon the Aruban "powers that be" regarding the contents of the trap/cage.

If Kyle were to step forward and do right because it is right ... if this young man would reveal ALL to the FBI and the family while aware that in all probability there will be personal consequences ...

Janet

+++++

OPRAH WINFREY SHOW
January 27, 2008


BETH HOLLOWAY: ... we've never really relied on an investigative approach to find an answer to Natalee. I think what we've relied on more heavily is that at any given moment something unexpected could happen and we really feel anyone could talk at any moment.
 
http://www2.oprah.com/world/politics/slide/20080116/politics_284_203.jhtml


KYLE KINGMAN'S POSTS SUBMITED TO A PRIVATE FORUM

Kyle: John is not a believer in the trap. He took ALE's word as gospel that it wasn't case related, yet never studied the videos or bothered to inquire further. He had plans on doing business with Aruba and in S. America and he didn't want to hurt any feelings by talks hinting at lack of complete trust and friendship.

Kyle: Notice the end of the skirt is an identical match to the 90 degree angle in the sand. I believe her left arm was outstretched with her legs slightly bent. I did not edit the legs. I believe the tarp was placed over her and tucked around her, or perhaps tied down. I believe there are several rocks laying on the sand which were placed on the tarp, or inside the tarp over her body which explains their unusual location. Either way, the proportions appear promising.

Kyle: I took the proportions of the body form from the head, to shoulder, to a 90 degree angle which I believed to be the hem line of Natalee's skirt. I then took those proportions and matched them to the photo of Natalee with what she was last seen wearing. The proportions matched within an inch from head, to shoulder, to skirt line. Based on this comparison and with what we believed we saw in the Dec 29th video, Tim Miller contacted the family and told them the 99.9% comment. I told Tim not to do anything until we have forensic results back after the site is processed. Jan 7th we sampled the contents and in my opinion we found the skirt under the sand along with the other items The blue fabric was found right where the skirt is pictured. If it isn't her, it will forever haunt me as a major cosmic WTF.
This one sentence in Kyles's post has Me wondering Does the FBI know.....

Jan 7th we sampled the contents and in my opinion we found the skirt under the sand along with the other items The blue fabric was found right where the skirt is pictured.


Who is We....Is it the Good Guys or the Bad Guys....and where are the samples....did the Persistence Crew sample the contents prior to ALE and were they given to the FBI? I still think that the FBI knows alot more than We do.....At least I hope that they do....I think that We will learn some very interesting things in the near future.....JMHO!


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #787 12/24/08 -
Post by: texasmom on December 29, 2008, 03:53:37 PM
I came across this article tonight, I don't remember it being posted recently in reference to the Persistence search for Natalee; if it has I apologize.  There is not a date I can find for when it was published, but I think it must have been from Nov. 2007.

http://www.katc.com/Global/story.asp?S=7428547

Crews Leave Acadiana To Search For Natalee Holloway
 
David D'Aquin
 
(KATC)-- An international story takes on an Acadiana angle Thursday. Crews from Acadiana are on their way to Aruba to help in the search for Natalee Holloway. Holloway has been missing for two and a half years.

In St. Martin Parish Thursday-- Holloway's father who said he is excited about the search. He went on further, and said he is looking for closure. That "closure" wouldn't be possible without the help of strangers.

"We just didn't have the capabilities," said Dave Holloway, "Louis Shaefer found out about it and said, 'i've got the ability.' I've got the expertise. I've got the equipment, and I can do the job."

Louis Shaefer is retired after working off shore for more than 40 years. He's paying for the million dollar project.

"I'm just lucky that I'm at the right place at the right time," said Shaefer.

"we're just so thankful that he's got a big heart and is willing to do that," said Holloway.

The ship is the research vessel "Persistance," owned by Marine Services in Lafayette. It will take about seven days to make the journey from the Port of Iberia to Aruba.

"i've got a feeling that if she's in the ocean, these guys are going to find her," said Holloway, who will be staying in U.S. while crews search for his daughter. He said, he knows his daughter is dead, and doesn't want to be there when she is found, "the FBI told us that Natalee's not with us anymore. And, as a parent, you always hope that wasn't the case. But, in reality, we know that already."



Just like Dave Holloway, we all trusted them to do the right thing if and when they found her!   ::MonkeyNoNo::


Thanks texasmom.

The family of Natalee Holloway has no idea that the "game was fixed." and ... those who sacrificially donated to the Persistence undertaking had no idea that it was nothing but a hoax and ... that they were being scammed.

Janet
________

BROTHER OF BETH HOLLOWAY'S POST TO THE SCARED MONKEYS FORUM

Private Eye:
"If I understood Kyle correctly, and that would be that the Arubans retrieved and possessed all finds, not sharing anything with the crew, then that effort was a waste of time and effort. The only thing it could have accomplished was to locate additional evidence for the Arubans to destroy. ... The effort was superb, but the game was fixed."


Thank you Janet. 

It is disgusting beyond belief to me that this was a "game" at all!  (http://i21.photobucket.com/albums/b258/texasmom55/Greetings/smileys/mad.gif)


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #787 12/24/08 -
Post by: bastibro on December 29, 2008, 03:58:49 PM
I have calculated that the skull in the cage is about 4.5 inches (11.4 cm) long.
That seems to me very small for a skull.

The average Skull Length of a human is 8.45 inches (21.5cm).


Correction: Average Caucasian Skull is 7.9 inches(20cm).


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #787 12/24/08 -
Post by: Tamikosmom on December 29, 2008, 04:07:23 PM
Those who were part of the coverup regarding the happenings on the morning of May 30, 2005 ... the morning when an American citizen went missing and was never seen again ... whisked away the contents of the cage/trap discovered as a result of the Persistence undertaking ... whisked away the contents of the cage/trap without so much of a challenge by the John Silvetti ... John Silvetti  who was in charge of the Persistence undertaking.

Kyle Kingman has shared through the leaked ROV images as well as his own words that John Silvetti possessed underlying motives in regards to the chain of custody of the contents of the trap/cage to the enemy ... underlying motives that had nothing to do with justice for Natalee Holloway or a measure of closure for a long-suffering family ... motives that were self-serving.

Kyle Kingman could possibly be the hero who Beth Holloway felt in her heart would eventually emerge.

If Kyle would expose his observations/concerns/suspicions while he was employed in a professional capacity on board the Persistence undertaking concerning the John Silvetti/ALE connection ... pressure could be brought upon the Aruban "powers that be" regarding the contents of the trap/cage.

If Kyle were to step forward and do right because it is right ... if this young man would reveal ALL to the FBI and the family while aware that in all probability there will be personal consequences ...

Janet

+++++

OPRAH WINFREY SHOW
January 27, 2008


BETH HOLLOWAY: ... we've never really relied on an investigative approach to find an answer to Natalee. I think what we've relied on more heavily is that at any given moment something unexpected could happen and we really feel anyone could talk at any moment.
 
http://www2.oprah.com/world/politics/slide/20080116/politics_284_203.jhtml


KYLE KINGMAN'S POSTS SUBMITED TO A PRIVATE FORUM

Kyle: John is not a believer in the trap. He took ALE's word as gospel that it wasn't case related, yet never studied the videos or bothered to inquire further. He had plans on doing business with Aruba and in S. America and he didn't want to hurt any feelings by talks hinting at lack of complete trust and friendship.

Kyle: Notice the end of the skirt is an identical match to the 90 degree angle in the sand. I believe her left arm was outstretched with her legs slightly bent. I did not edit the legs. I believe the tarp was placed over her and tucked around her, or perhaps tied down. I believe there are several rocks laying on the sand which were placed on the tarp, or inside the tarp over her body which explains their unusual location. Either way, the proportions appear promising.

Kyle: I took the proportions of the body form from the head, to shoulder, to a 90 degree angle which I believed to be the hem line of Natalee's skirt. I then took those proportions and matched them to the photo of Natalee with what she was last seen wearing. The proportions matched within an inch from head, to shoulder, to skirt line. Based on this comparison and with what we believed we saw in the Dec 29th video, Tim Miller contacted the family and told them the 99.9% comment. I told Tim not to do anything until we have forensic results back after the site is processed. Jan 7th we sampled the contents and in my opinion we found the skirt under the sand along with the other items The blue fabric was found right where the skirt is pictured. If it isn't her, it will forever haunt me as a major cosmic WTF.
This one sentence in Kyles's post has Me wondering Does the FBI know.....

Jan 7th we sampled the contents and in my opinion we found the skirt under the sand along with the other items The blue fabric was found right where the skirt is pictured.


Who is We....Is it the Good Guys or the Bad Guys....and where are the samples....did the Persistence Crew sample the contents prior to ALE and were they given to the FBI? I still think that the FBI knows alot more than We do.....At least I hope that they do....I think that We will learn some very interesting things in the near future.....JMHO!

Kyle's words implies that the sampling of the contents of the cage/trap took place underwater.  He states that he viewed the process from a video.

Janet

++++++

ocean exploration (Kyle)
Re: Natalee Case Discussion #744 3/19 -
« Reply #201 on: March 19, 2008, 08:21:47 PM »


We had little option other than to have the Aruban dive division recover the samples and bring them back under their care.  Remember we are Americans working in Aruban waters, subject to their laws, invitation, and blessing.  Our hands are tied for the most part. I personally was extremely uncomfortable with the chain of custody, being that we weren't a part of it, but I was powerless to do anything about it.   The samples were photographed in detail by one Aruban diver and the other two investigated the contents of the trap, the dimensions, the rigging, and what surrounded the trap.  From the video, it looked like they did a diligent and careful job with the samples and the underwater photography.  I don't know who has these pictures, but I must assume ALE.

http://scaredmonkeys.net/index.php?topic=2721.msg366857#msg366857



Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #787 12/24/08 -
Post by: Blonde on December 29, 2008, 04:08:26 PM
Before people jump to soon into conclusions, literally the article states he is looking for ways for selling drugs en setting up a marihuana-plantation. I should have made a more proper translation. Remember that I have to make a double translation: first from Papiamento to Dutch and than to English.

Is this illegal to do in the Netherlands?
I just don't know ,cuz I know you can buy pot and it's not against the law there.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #787 12/24/08 -
Post by: 2NJSons_Mom on December 29, 2008, 04:09:19 PM
I have calculated that the skull in the cage is about 4.5 inches (11.4 cm) long.
That seems to me very small for a skull.

The average Skull Length of a human is 8.45 inches (21.5cm).


Correction: Average Caucasian Skull is 7.9 inches(20cm).

I can't dispute your calculations, because it most certainly is not my area of expertise, but could the sea water and sand movement wear down bones?  Having been to the ocean's shore here, I've seen many shells, etc. that are worn but have no idea what the conditions are like at 90 ft in the Caribbean. 


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #787 12/24/08 -
Post by: texasmom on December 29, 2008, 04:10:09 PM
I have calculated that the skull in the cage is about 4.5 inches (11.4 cm) long.
That seems to me very small for a skull.

The average Skull Length of a human is 8.45 inches (21.5cm).


Correction: Average Caucasian Skull is 7.9 inches(20cm).

Hi Bastibro,
I'm not sure the actual size can be determined from the pictures we've viewed, it was discussed a while back and this was somewhat explained.  If I can find those posts, I will repost them.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #787 12/24/08 -
Post by: WhiskeyGirl on December 29, 2008, 04:12:36 PM
I have calculated that the skull in the cage is about 4.5 inches (11.4 cm) long.
That seems to me very small for a skull.

The average Skull Length of a human is 8.45 inches (21.5cm).


Correction: Average Caucasian Skull is 7.9 inches(20cm).

Perhaps it is the skull of a child?  Simian?  Miniature donkey?


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #787 12/24/08 -
Post by: Tamikosmom on December 29, 2008, 04:12:46 PM
2009 is upon us and i'm still keeping the faith that there are some secret witnesses..........No.I'm not holding my breath. ::MonkeyDance::

Keepthefaith ... witnesses have come and gone since the getgo ...

Deepak Kalpoe related to one of the security guards while they were both detained that Paulus was a participant the Holliday collaboration.

Where is Mickey John today?  Where is his official statement?

Janet

+++++++++++++

The Holliday Inn Fabrication

Mickey John
On the Record w/ Greta
June 29, 2005


JOHN: ... He (Deepak) said a story being made up about dropping the girl of at a Holiday Inn, was all something being made up. He, and the Dutch guy, and the Dutch guy's father, they sit and made up the story.

VAN SUSTEREN: The father, too?

JOHN: All of them. They made up...

VAN SUSTEREN: Did he specifically say — Deepak specifically say to you the father was part of that?

JOHN: Deepak told me that he and the family sit down and they made up the story.

VAN SUSTEREN: So family and not father?

JOHN: Well, I don't know who the family consists of. But I know the father was involved, according to him.

http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,161044,00.html


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #787 12/24/08 -
Post by: bastibro on December 29, 2008, 04:23:10 PM
Before people jump to soon into conclusions, literally the article states he is looking for ways for selling drugs en setting up a marihuana-plantation. I should have made a more proper translation. Remember that I have to make a double translation: first from Papiamento to Dutch and than to English.

Is this illegal to do in the Netherlands?
I just don't know ,cuz I know you can buy pot and it's not against the law there.


Yes Blonde, it is illegal here to sell any drugs(with the exception of the so-called coffee shops).
Setting up plantations is also illegal.
I`m convinced he will not try to start his marijuana plantation in Thailand or in Laos, he would have very big problems if he gets caught there  ::MonkeyHaHa::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #787 12/24/08 -
Post by: Keepthefaith on December 29, 2008, 04:28:05 PM
2009 is upon us and i'm still keeping the faith that there are some secret witnesses..........No.I'm not holding my breath. ::MonkeyDance::

Keepthefaith ... witnesses have come and gone since the getgo ...

Deepak Kalpoe related to one of the security guards while they were both detained that Paulus was a participant the Holliday collaboration.

Where is Mickey John today?  Where is his official statement?

Janet

+++++++++++++

The Holliday Inn Fabrication

Mickey John
On the Record w/ Greta
June 29, 2005


JOHN: ... He (Deepak) said a story being made up about dropping the girl of at a Holiday Inn, was all something being made up. He, and the Dutch guy, and the Dutch guy's father, they sit and made up the story.

VAN SUSTEREN: The father, too?

JOHN: All of them. They made up...

VAN SUSTEREN: Did he specifically say — Deepak specifically say to you the father was part of that?

JOHN: Deepak told me that he and the family sit down and they made up the story.

VAN SUSTEREN: So family and not father?

JOHN: Well, I don't know who the family consists of. But I know the father was involved, according to him.

http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,161044,00.html


It's all there Janet!All for the FREEDOM of Paulus's little boy Joran?Or Paulus himself?I'm still leaning in the direction of Paulus playing a active role in the murder itself.Joran,Deepak,as well as Satish are not that important to cover this whole thing up.... ::MonkeyConfused::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #787 12/24/08 -
Post by: bastibro on December 29, 2008, 04:33:21 PM
I have calculated that the skull in the cage is about 4.5 inches (11.4 cm) long.
That seems to me very small for a skull.

The average Skull Length of a human is 8.45 inches (21.5cm).


Correction: Average Caucasian Skull is 7.9 inches(20cm).

Hi Bastibro,
I'm not sure the actual size can be determined from the pictures we've viewed, it was discussed a while back and this was somewhat explained.  If I can find those posts, I will repost them.

I guess i`ve missed that TexasMom. I took the measurements of the cage and the squares and came to a proportionately skullsize.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #787 12/24/08 -
Post by: bastibro on December 29, 2008, 04:34:25 PM
I have calculated that the skull in the cage is about 4.5 inches (11.4 cm) long.
That seems to me very small for a skull.

The average Skull Length of a human is 8.45 inches (21.5cm).


Correction: Average Caucasian Skull is 7.9 inches(20cm).

Perhaps it is the skull of a child?  Simian?  Miniature donkey?

Maybe sponge bob`s  ::MonkeyHaHa::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #787 12/24/08 -
Post by: texasmom on December 29, 2008, 04:36:19 PM
I have calculated that the skull in the cage is about 4.5 inches (11.4 cm) long.
That seems to me very small for a skull.

The average Skull Length of a human is 8.45 inches (21.5cm).


Correction: Average Caucasian Skull is 7.9 inches(20cm).

Hi Bastibro,
I'm not sure the actual size can be determined from the pictures we've viewed, it was discussed a while back and this was somewhat explained.  If I can find those posts, I will repost them.

Bastibro,
I think this is the post I recall, it wasn't specifically about the skull but explains how size can be hard to tell in this circumstance.  Private Eye asked the question, the response is from oceanexploration.

http://scaredmonkeys.net/index.php?action=profile;u=3285;sa=showPosts;start=100

Quote
Natalee Holloway / LCD Archive / Re: Natalee Case Discussion #739 3/3 -  on: March 03, 2008, 02:35:58 PM 
Quote from: private eye on March 03, 2008, 02:25:13 PM
Any estimations as to the dimensions and weight of the cage, or based upon the general conditions of the cage, coral build up, rust, etc. how long the cage had been submersed? It looked awfully large, but water can distort sizes to a certain extent. It looked a lot larger than the cages that would have been at the fishermans hut.


The trap was symmetrical in width and length at approximately 7.5 ft. It was approximately 2.25-2.5 ft high.  You're correct about the ROV video lens distorting perspective due to the paralax view lens.   
 


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #787 12/24/08 -
Post by: bastibro on December 29, 2008, 04:37:23 PM
Hi Johan!  ::MonkeyWink::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #787 12/24/08 -
Post by: johan555 on December 29, 2008, 04:38:14 PM
Hi Johan!  ::MonkeyWink::

hey ouwe reus ! alles goed ?  ::MonkeyHaHa::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #787 12/24/08 -
Post by: bastibro on December 29, 2008, 04:48:15 PM
I have calculated that the skull in the cage is about 4.5 inches (11.4 cm) long.
That seems to me very small for a skull.

The average Skull Length of a human is 8.45 inches (21.5cm).


Correction: Average Caucasian Skull is 7.9 inches(20cm).

Hi Bastibro,
I'm not sure the actual size can be determined from the pictures we've viewed, it was discussed a while back and this was somewhat explained.  If I can find those posts, I will repost them.

Bastibro,
I think this is the post I recall, it wasn't specifically about the skull but explains how size can be hard to tell in this circumstance.  Private Eye asked the question, the response is from oceanexploration.

http://scaredmonkeys.net/index.php?action=profile;u=3285;sa=showPosts;start=100

Quote
Natalee Holloway / LCD Archive / Re: Natalee Case Discussion #739 3/3 -  on: March 03, 2008, 02:35:58 PM 
Quote from: private eye on March 03, 2008, 02:25:13 PM
Any estimations as to the dimensions and weight of the cage, or based upon the general conditions of the cage, coral build up, rust, etc. how long the cage had been submersed? It looked awfully large, but water can distort sizes to a certain extent. It looked a lot larger than the cages that would have been at the fishermans hut.


The trap was symmetrical in width and length at approximately 7.5 ft. It was approximately 2.25-2.5 ft high.  You're correct about the ROV video lens distorting perspective due to the paralax view lens.   
 


Thank you TM! The size is correct.
The cage size doesn't change in the water and i think the skull size would also not become smaller at a depth of 90 ft.
A human skull would almost be 1 third of the cage height.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #787 12/24/08 -
Post by: bastibro on December 29, 2008, 04:53:37 PM
Hi Johan!  ::MonkeyWink::

hey ouwe reus ! alles goed ?  ::MonkeyHaHa::

LOL ja hOOr, met jou ook? Ik lees niet zo veel van je de laatste tijd. How come?


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #787 12/24/08 -
Post by: bastibro on December 29, 2008, 04:55:09 PM
(http://i272.photobucket.com/albums/jj176/bastibro/verwant/2345841784_52614dbecb_ocopy.jpg)


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #787 12/24/08 -
Post by: Buckeye on December 29, 2008, 04:57:07 PM
The mandible is a large portion of the skull.  Chances are that the mandible was not attached to the remainder of the skull, if it is a skull.

Cageman

Thank you for the summary translation. I understand the multiple steps needed to translate and that the final product might need clarification.  Your translations are a whole lot better than the online versions.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #787 12/24/08 -
Post by: Tamikosmom on December 29, 2008, 05:01:11 PM
Jug Twitty recognized very early on that the domino effect in regards to accountability dictated that justice for his stepdaughter would never come from an Aruban or Dutch courtroom.  Therefore ... the affording of a measure of closure for the family was where it was at.

It is my contention that a measure of closure for the family of Natalee Holloway dictates THE PERSISTENCE HOAX MUST BE EXPOSED ... THE CONTENTS OF THE CAGE/TRAP MUST BE REVEALED!!

Janet

++++++++

'Scarborough Country' for July 14
updated 8:45 a.m. PT, Fri., July. 15, 2005


JUG TWITTY, NATALEE HOLLOWAY'S STEPFATHER: Beth and I have been through this emotional roller coaster. And all we want is Natalee, whether she's alive or dead. We want to bring her back to the United States, and we'll leave and they can do whatever they want to do.

http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/8551824/

 


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #787 12/24/08 -
Post by: Buckeye on December 29, 2008, 05:03:05 PM
I believe the trap was 7.5 feet wide or approx. 90 inches.  Each one of the outlined sections (three in total) would be 30 inches wide.  There appears to be about 21 little squares across each 30 inch section.  That would make each little square about 1.5 inches wide.  The skull appears to be about 4 little boxes long or 6 inches....about the correct size...without the mandible.  :smt102


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #787 12/24/08 -
Post by: bastibro on December 29, 2008, 05:11:20 PM
The mandible is a large portion of the skull.  Chances are that the mandible was not attached to the remainder of the skull, if it is a skull.

Cageman

Thank you for the summary translation. I understand the multiple steps needed to translate and that the final product might need clarification.  Your translations are a whole lot better than the online versions.

i think you`re right Buckeye, but the skull is relatively way to small. ::MonkeyShocked::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #787 12/24/08 -
Post by: bastibro on December 29, 2008, 05:16:16 PM
I believe the trap was 7.5 feet wide or approx. 90 inches.  Each one of the outlined sections (three in total) would be 30 inches wide.  There appears to be about 21 little squares across each 30 inch section.  That would make each little square about 1.5 inches wide.  The skull appears to be about 4 little boxes long or 6 inches....about the correct size...without the mandible.  :smt102

I have exactly the same measurements, however in my opinion the skull covers 3 boxes  ::MonkeyWink::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #787 12/24/08 -
Post by: Tamikosmom on December 29, 2008, 05:18:47 PM
CAGE/TRAP DIMENSIONS

private eye (Beth Holloway's Brother)
Re: Natalee Case Discussion #739 3/3 -
« Reply #88 on: March 03, 2008, 06:25:13 PM »


Any estimations as to the dimensions and weight of the cage, or based upon the general conditions of the cage, coral build up, rust, etc. how long the cage had been submersed? It looked awfully large, but water can distort sizes to a certain extent. It looked a lot larger than the cages that would have been at the fishermans hut.

http://scaredmonkeys.net/index.php?topic=2668.msg360066#msg360066


oceanexploration (Kyle Kingman)
Re: Natalee Case Discussion #739 3/3 -
« Reply #92 on: March 03, 2008, 06:35:58 PM »


The trap was symmetrical in width and length at approximately 7.5 ft. It was approximately 2.25-2.5 ft high.  You're correct about the ROV video lens distorting perspective due to the paralax view lens.

http://scaredmonkeys.net/index.php?topic=2668.msg360072;topicseen#msg360072


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #787 12/24/08 -
Post by: bastibro on December 29, 2008, 05:25:51 PM
Thanks Janet,

The trap stolen from one of the FH was much smaller.
5.5x4 ft with a height of 1.4 ft.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #787 12/24/08 -
Post by: johan555 on December 29, 2008, 05:41:23 PM
Hi Johan!  ::MonkeyWink::

hey ouwe reus ! alles goed ?  ::MonkeyHaHa::

LOL ja hOOr, met jou ook? Ik lees niet zo veel van je de laatste tijd. How come?

kerst tijd ! heb allemaal familie over de vloer en die willen ook aandacht !


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #787 12/24/08 -
Post by: Tamikosmom on December 29, 2008, 05:50:09 PM
Hi Johan!  ::MonkeyWink::

hey ouwe reus ! alles goed ?  ::MonkeyHaHa::

LOL ja hOOr, met jou ook? Ik lees niet zo veel van je de laatste tijd. How come?

kerst tijd ! heb allemaal familie over de vloer en die willen ook aandacht !

johan555 San and bastibro San

Wakarimasen

Arigatogozaimus

Janet


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #787 12/24/08 -
Post by: bastibro on December 29, 2008, 05:51:54 PM
Hi Johan!  ::MonkeyWink::

hey ouwe reus ! alles goed ?  ::MonkeyHaHa::

LOL ja hOOr, met jou ook? Ik lees niet zo veel van je de laatste tijd. How come?

kerst tijd ! heb allemaal familie over de vloer en die willen ook aandacht !

haha ok, das ook erg belangrijk, en gezellig ::MonkeyHaHa::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #787 12/24/08 -
Post by: johan555 on December 29, 2008, 05:54:43 PM
lorenzo-paul  ::MonkeyHaHa::

(http://i252.photobucket.com/albums/hh25/johan555/pvdslvrcomparekopie.jpg)


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #787 12/24/08 -
Post by: bastibro on December 29, 2008, 05:58:58 PM
E! will broadcast a special on Natalee tonight. is there a way to watch that on-line??


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #787 12/24/08 -
Post by: Tamikosmom on December 29, 2008, 06:04:48 PM
lorenzo-paul  ::MonkeyHaHa::

(http://i252.photobucket.com/albums/hh25/johan555/pvdslvrcomparekopie.jpg)

DANA PRETZER
June 18, 2006


MANSUR:  I do know what our reporters have been able to find, Lorenzo is a half brother of Joran. He has a boat. He lives in a secluded section of the island, very close to Joran. I don't know if he was questioned, but people mention his name quite often in regard to this case.

http://sundaynightsatellite.libsyn.com/index.php?post_year=2006&post_month=06&post_day=18


Dave Holloway
Question and Answer Chat - BFN
January 23, 2006


14. Why was the school bus driver called the next morning and told to pick up Joran at Lorenzo's house?
 
DAVE HOLLOWAY: Joran was allegedly dropped off at a bus stop on the main highway. The bus driver had not made it there yet and saved Paulus about 30 minutes. Lorenzo's house was nearby.

http://blogsfornatalee.com/forum/index.php?topic=2256.0


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #787 12/24/08 -
Post by: truthseeker2 on December 29, 2008, 07:05:00 PM
(http://i272.photobucket.com/albums/jj176/bastibro/verwant/2345841784_52614dbecb_ocopy.jpg)

Where were Tim Miller, Kyle, John Silvetti, and the Dateline crew, not to mention every other person on the Persistence who were in the area watching the monitors, when this image from the ROV flashed on the monitors?  This was taken 60 seconds after the 'thumbs down'.  That is why I am not sure we are seeing human remains here.  If they saw this on the monitor and didn't ask 'How can you give the thumbs down?' to Tim Trahan, then are we sure those are humain remains???


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #787 12/24/08 -
Post by: Magnolia on December 29, 2008, 08:24:35 PM
(http://i272.photobucket.com/albums/jj176/bastibro/verwant/2345841784_52614dbecb_ocopy.jpg)

Where were Tim Miller, Kyle, John Silvetti, and the Dateline crew, not to mention every other person on the Persistence who were in the area watching the monitors, when this image from the ROV flashed on the monitors?  This was taken 60 seconds after the 'thumbs down'.  That is why I am not sure we are seeing human remains here.  If they saw this on the monitor and didn't ask 'How can you give the thumbs down?' to Tim Trahan, then are we sure those are humain remains???

 I figure that the only diver aboard the Persistence went down and
and gave the thumbs down and nobody questioned his observations.
He had seen inside the trap first hand and they had only seen images
from the ROV.
It could not be Natalee in the trap if the Persistence was to continue
on its mission to map the ocean floor.  Tim Trahan was a part of the
scam before the Persistence ever left Louisiana.  I feel certain that
he and Silvetti had discussed what his signal would be before he
ever made the dive.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #787 12/24/08 -
Post by: texasmom on December 29, 2008, 08:42:48 PM
(http://i272.photobucket.com/albums/jj176/bastibro/verwant/2345841784_52614dbecb_ocopy.jpg)

Where were Tim Miller, Kyle, John Silvetti, and the Dateline crew, not to mention every other person on the Persistence who were in the area watching the monitors, when this image from the ROV flashed on the monitors?  This was taken 60 seconds after the 'thumbs down'.  That is why I am not sure we are seeing human remains here.  If they saw this on the monitor and didn't ask 'How can you give the thumbs down?' to Tim Trahan, then are we sure those are humain remains???

 I figure that the only diver aboard the Persistence went down and
and gave the thumbs down and nobody questioned his observations.
He had seen inside the trap first hand and they had only seen images
from the ROV.
It could not be Natalee in the trap if the Persistence was to continue
on its mission to map the ocean floor.  Tim Trahan was a part of the
scam before the Persistence ever left Louisiana.  I feel certain that
he and Silvetti had discussed what his signal would be before he
ever made the dive.

This is the explanation that Kyle gave after it was questioned back in March.  The explanation in itself poses even more questions in my opinion.  One being, why were they out of dive time?  Magnolia may be right.   ::MonkeyNoNo::     

Quote
Natalee Holloway / LCD Archive / Re: Natalee Case Discussion #739 3/3 -  on: March 03, 2008, 07:34:25 PM 
To clarify the thumb down issue:

-It was agreed immediately before the 30-Dec dive that 2 thumbs up (by Tim Trahan) meant positive ID on Natalee from something conclusive.
-One thumb up was to indicate human remains

-There was no set signal pre-dive for anything but the above scenarios.
 
By Tim's own admission, his observation of the inside of the trap (lasting a few seconds) was inconclusive. His signal indicated an inconclusive observation referring to the object said by some to be a skull, a hardened sponge by others...
What you can't see is immediately before Tim approached the trap opening, a large skate stirred up sediment reducing visibility.
The quick signal came because the dive time was nearly up .


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #787 12/24/08 -
Post by: texasmom on December 29, 2008, 08:45:50 PM
This is the link for the discussion where Kyle's explanation was posted.

http://scaredmonkeys.net/index.php?topic=2668.msg360282#msg360282


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #787 12/24/08 -
Post by: Tamikosmom on December 29, 2008, 09:07:16 PM
OFF TOPIC

Thanks for explaining Muffy, it's been a tough day and having just spoken with Peache's husband I need to make a post on his behalf.

He is such a lovely man and my heart breaks for he and his daughter.

We lost our Peaches to her illness, I will be forwarding information regarding the coming service for her to Klaas so that anyone who is in that area who might want to attend will have the information they will need to do so.

Please know her husband spoke of the love and support so many at SM had for Peaches, it's so apparent how meaningful that is to him at this time, he spoke of how many loved Peaches and it is so very true.

For intuition's sake I was on a mission to speak to her today, oddly enough post leaving her a voicemail, my daughter called me. We heard two series of beeps on the phone line, we both commented never having heard beeps like that on our mobile prior - we joked it was Rick letting us know he was there.

About a half hour later her husband called and left a voicemail. I have to think that Rick has Peaches by the hand now, that those beeps were their way of letting us know that.

There is a part of me that is in such deep sorrow tonight, for losing our Peaches and knowing the journey ahead for her husband and daughter. We need to keep them in our prayers as often as we can.

God bless you Peaches, forever and always. We miss and love you immensely and celebrate that God will bring you peace and a new purpose.

God bless her husband, her daughter, and her family and friends. We grieve with you and we hope in some small way, to be part of the many lights she cast into this world for goodness and for courage in the face of great adversity.

I find comfort thinking of her walking among the roses so many posted for her here.




Topic: PEACHES "rally", prayer and encouragement thead! R.I.P SWEET PEACHES  

http://scaredmonkeys.net/index.php?topic=1870.780



Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #787 12/24/08 -
Post by: truthseeker2 on December 29, 2008, 09:07:25 PM
(http://i272.photobucket.com/albums/jj176/bastibro/verwant/2345841784_52614dbecb_ocopy.jpg)

Where were Tim Miller, Kyle, John Silvetti, and the Dateline crew, not to mention every other person on the Persistence who were in the area watching the monitors, when this image from the ROV flashed on the monitors?  This was taken 60 seconds after the 'thumbs down'.  That is why I am not sure we are seeing human remains here.  If they saw this on the monitor and didn't ask 'How can you give the thumbs down?' to Tim Trahan, then are we sure those are humain remains???

 I figure that the only diver aboard the Persistence went down and
and gave the thumbs down and nobody questioned his observations.
He had seen inside the trap first hand and they had only seen images
from the ROV.
It could not be Natalee in the trap if the Persistence was to continue
on its mission to map the ocean floor.  Tim Trahan was a part of the
scam before the Persistence ever left Louisiana.  I feel certain that
he and Silvetti had discussed what his signal would be before he
ever made the dive.

The point was...what about ALL those people, Tim Miller included, who were sitting there watching the monitor.  They had to have seen that image.  And NOBODY SAID..."What the hell is that!"  We are talking no more than 60 seconds from the thumbs down till this image is taken by the ROV.  You would have to believe that EVERYONE sitting there was in on some kind of conspiracy.  I know Tim Miller was not, and I doubt Dateline was.  I'm not so sure I can just assume this was a conspiracy from the getgo. 

I know..I know...I may get run off the forum like others have, but gee whizz!  If this conspiracy gets any bigger it will include the entire universe outside of the few people left posting here.

Maybe those are human remains, maybe not.  I just cannot believe not one person looked at that initial image in the monitor and said nothing at all.





Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #787 12/24/08 -
Post by: truthseeker2 on December 29, 2008, 09:10:40 PM
OFF TOPIC

Thanks for explaining Muffy, it's been a tough day and having just spoken with Peache's husband I need to make a post on his behalf.

He is such a lovely man and my heart breaks for he and his daughter.

We lost our Peaches to her illness, I will be forwarding information regarding the coming service for her to Klaas so that anyone who is in that area who might want to attend will have the information they will need to do so.

Please know her husband spoke of the love and support so many at SM had for Peaches, it's so apparent how meaningful that is to him at this time, he spoke of how many loved Peaches and it is so very true.

For intuition's sake I was on a mission to speak to her today, oddly enough post leaving her a voicemail, my daughter called me. We heard two series of beeps on the phone line, we both commented never having heard beeps like that on our mobile prior - we joked it was Rick letting us know he was there.

About a half hour later her husband called and left a voicemail. I have to think that Rick has Peaches by the hand now, that those beeps were their way of letting us know that.

There is a part of me that is in such deep sorrow tonight, for losing our Peaches and knowing the journey ahead for her husband and daughter. We need to keep them in our prayers as often as we can.

God bless you Peaches, forever and always. We miss and love you immensely and celebrate that God will bring you peace and a new purpose.

God bless her husband, her daughter, and her family and friends. We grieve with you and we hope in some small way, to be part of the many lights she cast into this world for goodness and for courage in the face of great adversity.

I find comfort thinking of her walking among the roses so many posted for her here.




Topic: PEACHES "rally", prayer and encouragement thead! R.I.P SWEET PEACHES  

http://scaredmonkeys.net/index.php?topic=1870.780



Thanks for posting this.  i had not seen it until now.  My heart goes out to the family.  Peaches was one strong lady.  May God bless and keep her.

truthseeker2


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #787 12/24/08 -
Post by: Magnolia on December 29, 2008, 09:19:09 PM
OFF TOPIC

Thanks for explaining Muffy, it's been a tough day and having just spoken with Peache's husband I need to make a post on his behalf.

He is such a lovely man and my heart breaks for he and his daughter.

We lost our Peaches to her illness, I will be forwarding information regarding the coming service for her to Klaas so that anyone who is in that area who might want to attend will have the information they will need to do so.

Please know her husband spoke of the love and support so many at SM had for Peaches, it's so apparent how meaningful that is to him at this time, he spoke of how many loved Peaches and it is so very true.

For intuition's sake I was on a mission to speak to her today, oddly enough post leaving her a voicemail, my daughter called me. We heard two series of beeps on the phone line, we both commented never having heard beeps like that on our mobile prior - we joked it was Rick letting us know he was there.

About a half hour later her husband called and left a voicemail. I have to think that Rick has Peaches by the hand now, that those beeps were their way of letting us know that.

There is a part of me that is in such deep sorrow tonight, for losing our Peaches and knowing the journey ahead for her husband and daughter. We need to keep them in our prayers as often as we can.

God bless you Peaches, forever and always. We miss and love you immensely and celebrate that God will bring you peace and a new purpose.

God bless her husband, her daughter, and her family and friends. We grieve with you and we hope in some small way, to be part of the many lights she cast into this world for goodness and for courage in the face of great adversity.

I find comfort thinking of her walking among the roses so many posted for her here.




Topic: PEACHES "rally", prayer and encouragement thead! R.I.P SWEET PEACHES  

http://scaredmonkeys.net/index.php?topic=1870.780



I am so sad about Peaches.  My heart aches for her family.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #787 12/24/08 -
Post by: Hotshot on December 29, 2008, 09:24:09 PM
Dear Kyle

You have a precious little daughter.  Please attempt to put yourself in the place of Natalee Holloway's parents and ... ask yourself what your reponse would have been ...  regarding the happenings encompassing the Persistence undertaking ... once you had set foot on American soil.

Would you have been submitting posts to forums expressing your concerns regarding your observations while on board the Persistence?  Would you be contacting major networks attempting to make a deal? 

Kyle ... according to Edlridge Cleaver ... you can either be part of the solution or part of the problem.

Which is it?

The family deserve to know IF their beloved Natalee's remains had been placed in that trap/cage.

In His Holy Name,

Janet

In His Holy Name,?  You have gone too far!  Several of you seem to think that KYLE was in charge of this trip.  All his job was, was to look at the footage, that is it!  he did his job!  He handed over all of what had to be handed over.  I do believe klaas said about a week ago to keep the peace here, and all you can do is keep preaching the same quotes over and over again.  People are getting tired of seeing the same thing, day in and day out.  when is this all going to stop?  I am making a call to Dave tomorrow, along with all the others who have touched base with him, just to let him know what is going on here, and what he thinks about people bashing the crew.  I am sure he wont be too thrilled to see that people are bashing these people who took months out of their lives, and millions to go and search.  I can't believe that people are stooping so low to think any of this!  It only shows some have too much time on their hands.  I am proud to be a monkey, but not with whats been talked about over the last month or so.  Some here don't even know me but despise me, and thats fine.....  i dont care what you think.  i have done my talk, done my walk.  Now lets see some of you do some walking and get up and do something about Natalaee being missing.  Stop the bashing, thats not what this site is about.  Deal with FACTS, now with what someone says to be Gospel.  Trust me, if vicky is who she says she is, and knows who she says she knows, things would have been done by now.... Really, "c'mon" think about it.  Geezzzzz


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #787 12/24/08 -
Post by: truthseeker2 on December 29, 2008, 09:33:06 PM
I'm with you on this one, Hotshot.  This has gone on and on now, and I see less and less interest in this forum.  I know if we have seen this, then the family has seen it and I trust they will handle things accordingly.  Until I see more proof that these are human remains....well, the search continues.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #787 12/24/08 -
Post by: wreck on December 29, 2008, 09:35:45 PM
Dear Kyle

You have a precious little daughter.  Please attempt to put yourself in the place of Natalee Holloway's parents and ... ask yourself what your reponse would have been ...  regarding the happenings encompassing the Persistence undertaking ... once you had set foot on American soil.

Would you have been submitting posts to forums expressing your concerns regarding your observations while on board the Persistence?  Would you be contacting major networks attempting to make a deal? 

Kyle ... according to Edlridge Cleaver ... you can either be part of the solution or part of the problem.

Which is it?

The family deserve to know IF their beloved Natalee's remains had been placed in that trap/cage.

In His Holy Name,

Janet

In His Holy Name,?  You have gone too far!  Several of you seem to think that KYLE was in charge of this trip.  All his job was, was to look at the footage, that is it!  he did his job!  He handed over all of what had to be handed over.  I do believe klaas said about a week ago to keep the peace here, and all you can do is keep preaching the same quotes over and over again.  People are getting tired of seeing the same thing, day in and day out.  when is this all going to stop?  I am making a call to Dave tomorrow, along with all the others who have touched base with him, just to let him know what is going on here, and what he thinks about people bashing the crew.  I am sure he wont be too thrilled to see that people are bashing these people who took months out of their lives, and millions to go and search.  I can't believe that people are stooping so low to think any of this!  It only shows some have too much time on their hands.  I am proud to be a monkey, but not with whats been talked about over the last month or so.  Some here don't even know me but despise me, and thats fine.....  i dont care what you think.  i have done my talk, done my walk.  Now lets see some of you do some walking and get up and do something about Natalaee being missing.  Stop the bashing, thats not what this site is about.  Deal with FACTS, now with what someone says to be Gospel.  Trust me, if vicky is who she says she is, and knows who she says she knows, things would have been done by now.... Really, "c'mon" think about it.  Geezzzzz
So when is it up to you to decide what are fair questions that some of us are asking? I have a real problem with anyone who tells me what I should think or do regarding this case. These are LEGITIMATE questions and concerns  -- to hell with playing "nice" with anyone here. You don't know anything more than the rest of us.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #787 12/24/08 -
Post by: Tamikosmom on December 29, 2008, 09:37:30 PM
It was difficult for Tim Miller to comprehend the findings in regards to the contents of the cage.  He had been so sure that the initial ROV images he viewed prior to the dive revealed the remains of Natalee Holloway.  However ... he had no choice.

However ... Kyle Kingman held a professional position on board the Persistance.  In his own words on both the SM forum and a private forum ... Kyle exposed his perspective regarding the ongoing happenings encompassing the entire search ... the discovery and ... the chain of custody that he observed.  I believe his words.

Janet

+++++++

THE DATELINE SPECIAL

The search for Natalee Holloway
TRANSCRIPT
By Chris Hansen
Correspondent
NBC News
updated 5:20 p.m. PT, Fri., Feb. 22, 2008


Tim Miller: I stepped on the boat and said “Natalee we're coming to get you.” Now we're finally coming to get you. And I still believe that from the bottom of my heart. She's out here and now we're on our way.

Over the holiday season, the crew of the persistence worked day and night to survey the ocean floor and look for targets that could hold the key to finding Natalee.

On Christmas Eve sonar pictures revealed what looked like a large trap, almost exactly where Tim Miller theorized it would be.

And on Dec. 29 the crew dropped a remote operated vehicle, or ROV, into the water to get a closer look.

Tim Miller: It looked like a skull. Still looks like a skull.  ... In my years of searching we have seen several bodies, skeletal remains--I have seen my own daughter's skeletal remains. I can’t help but believe at this moment that that is human remains in that crab trap.  

http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/23301056/page/4/


The search for Natalee Holloway
TRANSCRIPT
By Chris Hansen
Correspondent
NBC News
updated 5:20 p.m. PT, Fri., Feb. 22, 2008


Dave Holloway: I got a phone call from Tim.

Chris Hansen: And what'd he say?

Dave Holloway: He told me, he said, "Dave, we found her."

Chris Hansen: "We found her?"

Dave Holloway: Yeah. I said, "Are you sure?" and he said, "I’m 99.9 percent sure."  He said, "We hadn't gone down and dove under or anything. But the photographs--"he said, "I tell you, Dave." I-- he said, "That's what we're looking for. And that's gotta-- that-- that's it."

http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/23301056/page/4/


KYLE KINGMAN' - A PRIVATE FORUM

Kyle: John stood back and waited and worked with the Aruban Polis

Kyle: John definitely believed the Arubans at their every word

Kyle: John didn't want Tim Miller on board the Persistence because he said Tim wasn't necessary any more and was a liability.

Kyle: John told me then he didn't want to hear me ever mention the trap again.

Kyle: I did not feel the same and we had a major difference in opinion. He [John Silvetti] was the one who never pressed ALE to be completely open with us with the trap evidence. I would have forced them to. However, John was the one paying my invoices so I was forced to sit back and hope for the best.

Kyle: John is not a believer in the trap. He took ALE's word as gospel that it wasn't case related, yet never studied the videos or bothered to inquire further. He had plans on doing business with Aruba and in S. America and he didn't want to hurt any feelings by talks hinting at lack of complete trust and friendship.


KYLE KINGMAN - SM FORUM

ocean exploration (Kyle)
Re: Natalee Case Discussion #744 3/19 -
« Reply #201 on: March 19, 2008, 08:21:47 PM »


We had little option other than to have the Aruban dive division recover the samples and bring them back under their care.  Remember we are Americans working in Aruban waters, subject to their laws, invitation, and blessing.  Our hands are tied for the most part. I personally was extremely uncomfortable with the chain of custody, being that we weren't a part of it, but I was powerless to do anything about it.   The samples were photographed in detail by one Aruban diver and the other two investigated the contents of the trap, the dimensions, the rigging, and what surrounded the trap.  From the video, it looked like they did a diligent and careful job with the samples and the underwater photography.  I don't know who has these pictures, but I must assume ALE.

http://scaredmonkeys.net/index.php?topic=2721.msg366857#msg366857


oceanexploration
Re: Natalee Case Discussion #776 11/19-08
« Reply #705 on: November 20, 2008, 11:22:14 PM »


Tim Miller was never on the Persistence while I was not on board.  He stepped off on or about the 1st of Jan to follow up on the false lead in Costa Rica IIRC.

http://scaredmonkeys.net/index.php?topic=4153.msg551304#msg551304


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #787 12/24/08 -
Post by: San on December 29, 2008, 09:51:21 PM
Dear Kyle

You have a precious little daughter.  Please attempt to put yourself in the place of Natalee Holloway's parents and ... ask yourself what your reponse would have been ...  regarding the happenings encompassing the Persistence undertaking ... once you had set foot on American soil.

Would you have been submitting posts to forums expressing your concerns regarding your observations while on board the Persistence?  Would you be contacting major networks attempting to make a deal? 

Kyle ... according to Edlridge Cleaver ... you can either be part of the solution or part of the problem.

Which is it?

The family deserve to know IF their beloved Natalee's remains had been placed in that trap/cage.

In His Holy Name,

Janet

In His Holy Name,?  You have gone too far!  Several of you seem to think that KYLE was in charge of this trip.  All his job was, was to look at the footage, that is it!  he did his job!  He handed over all of what had to be handed over.  I do believe klaas said about a week ago to keep the peace here, and all you can do is keep preaching the same quotes over and over again.  People are getting tired of seeing the same thing, day in and day out.  when is this all going to stop?  I am making a call to Dave tomorrow, along with all the others who have touched base with him, just to let him know what is going on here, and what he thinks about people bashing the crew.  I am sure he wont be too thrilled to see that people are bashing these people who took months out of their lives, and millions to go and search.  I can't believe that people are stooping so low to think any of this!  It only shows some have too much time on their hands.  I am proud to be a monkey, but not with whats been talked about over the last month or so.  Some here don't even know me but despise me, and thats fine.....  i dont care what you think.  i have done my talk, done my walk.  Now lets see some of you do some walking and get up and do something about Natalaee being missing.   Stop the bashing, thats not what this site is about.  Deal with FACTS, now with what someone says to be Gospel.  Trust me, if vicky is who she says she is, and knows who she says she knows, things would have been done by now.... Really, "c'mon" think about it.  Geezzzzz

What people are getting tired.  How do you know what people have done for Natalee and what they haven't.  There are people who don't need to announce every little shit they take.  Don't threaten people about calling Dave.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #787 12/24/08 -
Post by: klaasend on December 29, 2008, 09:52:02 PM
You know what I feel bad about?  I feel bad that Dave and Beth have had to get phone calls from a million different people over the last nearly 4 years.

I don't know who is right or who is wrong in this issue with the trap.  All I know is Joran van der Sloot and the Kalpoe brothers were supposed to take Natalee back to the Holiday Inn on May 30, 2005 and they didn't.  They did something to her and she's gone.  They are responsible along with others.

After all this time, I have a real hard time with anyone telling us what to or not to post about in this forum.

HOTSHOT - how do you know you are right?

KERMIT - how do you know you are right?


Reminds me of the old days and SandraK telling us not to talk about her "baby".



Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #787 12/24/08 -
Post by: Lala'sMom on December 29, 2008, 09:53:47 PM
I know this is O/T but just in case someone misses it because they haven't ventured over to the lounge...rest in peace dear Peaches.

http://www.gratefulness.org/candles/candles.cfm?l=eng&gi=Peach


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #787 12/24/08 -
Post by: truthseeker2 on December 29, 2008, 09:59:18 PM
I know this is O/T but just in case someone misses it because they haven't ventured over to the lounge...rest in peace dear Peaches.

http://www.gratefulness.org/candles/candles.cfm?l=eng&gi=Peach

Thanks, Lala's.  I lit one there just a moment ago.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #787 12/24/08 -
Post by: Magnolia on December 29, 2008, 09:59:35 PM
Dear Kyle

You have a precious little daughter.  Please attempt to put yourself in the place of Natalee Holloway's parents and ... ask yourself what your reponse would have been ...  regarding the happenings encompassing the Persistence undertaking ... once you had set foot on American soil.

Would you have been submitting posts to forums expressing your concerns regarding your observations while on board the Persistence?  Would you be contacting major networks attempting to make a deal? 

Kyle ... according to Edlridge Cleaver ... you can either be part of the solution or part of the problem.

Which is it?

The family deserve to know IF their beloved Natalee's remains had been placed in that trap/cage.

In His Holy Name,

Janet

In His Holy Name,?  You have gone too far!  Several of you seem to think that KYLE was in charge of this trip.  All his job was, was to look at the footage, that is it!  he did his job!  He handed over all of what had to be handed over.  I do believe klaas said about a week ago to keep the peace here, and all you can do is keep preaching the same quotes over and over again.  People are getting tired of seeing the same thing, day in and day out.  when is this all going to stop?  I am making a call to Dave tomorrow, along with all the others who have touched base with him, just to let him know what is going on here, and what he thinks about people bashing the crew.  I am sure he wont be too thrilled to see that people are bashing these people who took months out of their lives, and millions to go and search.  I can't believe that people are stooping so low to think any of this!  It only shows some have too much time on their hands.  I am proud to be a monkey, but not with whats been talked about over the last month or so.  Some here don't even know me but despise me, and thats fine.....  i dont care what you think.  i have done my talk, done my walk.  Now lets see some of you do some walking and get up and do something about Natalaee being missing.  Stop the bashing, thats not what this site is about.  Deal with FACTS, now with what someone says to be Gospel.  Trust me, if vicky is who she says she is, and knows who she says she knows, things would have been done by now.... Really, "c'mon" think about it.  Geezzzzz

I am not tired of the quotes.  They are a good reminder.

Why don't you just call Dave tonight?


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #787 12/24/08 -
Post by: truthseeker2 on December 29, 2008, 10:04:19 PM
Natalee's story is E! right now.  Starting with Peter De Vries and Patrick tapes.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #787 12/24/08 -
Post by: Tamikosmom on December 29, 2008, 10:08:07 PM
Hotshot

My words were addressed to Kyle ... not you.

I do believe that I am right on when I say that Kyle and I share a common faith and ... it was from that perspective I was attempting to reach him concerning his own words describing what he experienced on board the Persistence ... what he experienced on board the Persistence which implied that the huge undertaking was not all about justice for Natalee Holloway and ... not all about a measure of closure for her family.

Kyle is a young man but he is a man nevertheless.  He is also a husband and a father of a precious baby girl.  His qualifications in regard to his profession are above reproach.

Closure for Natalee Holloway's family dictates that Kyle shares ALL with the family and the FBI regarding his observations regarding the John S./Aruban connection.

Hotshot ... I have posted nothing that I would not have voiced to my own son if he were in Kyle's place.  Doing right is not easy but ... it is right.

Hotshot ... Kyle Kingman does not required anybody to speak on his behalf.  Kyle is a grown man and is fully capable of articulating his own words.  I am looking so forward to a dialogue with Kyle regarding this topic.

Janet


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #787 12/24/08 -
Post by: Keepthefaith on December 29, 2008, 10:27:19 PM
People who continue to say Kermit doesn't know what she is talking about have been on here on numerous occasion's as she has posted and have not tried to dialogue with Kermit!Why?If anyone doesn't believe Kermit why not confront Kermit with what you know?You can't tell because it will affect the investigation?????Please.....We've had this discussion a few times.Spit it out or scroll on by......


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #787 12/24/08 -
Post by: texasmom on December 29, 2008, 10:44:39 PM
Kyle obviously had some concerns based on his own words.  At least Kyle was concerned enough (or had enough conscience) to share those concerns with others.  Those concerns bring questions.

Kermit thought we needed to know, I'm glad we do know.  I don't care who Kermit really is at least the frog thought enough of all of us to let us in on what the frog knows!

Janet, I would have said the same things to a son of mine if they were in Kyle's shoes.  As I'm sure you do also, I also have some things to say to others involved; if things were as they seem.

We all care about Natalee, and her family; if we didn't we wouldn't be here asking questions after all this time.



Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #787 12/24/08 -
Post by: klaasend on December 29, 2008, 10:56:38 PM
Anyone watching E?  Is it good?


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #787 12/24/08 -
Post by: truthseeker2 on December 29, 2008, 10:59:51 PM
Anyone watching E?  Is it good?

It's all Cuomo doing a recap of the Peter DeVries/Patrick tapes.  Then comparing Joran's demeanor to the interview Cuomo did in 2006.  Cuomo seems to believe the story told to Patrick.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #787 12/24/08 -
Post by: ldstlou on December 29, 2008, 11:00:00 PM
Dear Kyle

You have a precious little daughter.  Please attempt to put yourself in the place of Natalee Holloway's parents and ... ask yourself what your response would have been ...  regarding the happenings encompassing the Persistence undertaking ... once you had set foot on American soil.

Would you have been submitting posts to forums expressing your concerns regarding your observations while on board the Persistence?  Would you be contacting major networks attempting to make a deal? 

Kyle ... according to Edlridge Cleaver ... you can either be part of the solution or part of the problem.

Which is it?

The family deserve to know IF their beloved Natalee's remains had been placed in that trap/cage.

In His Holy Name,

Janet

In His Holy Name,?  You have gone too far!  Several of you seem to think that KYLE was in charge of this trip.  All his job was, was to look at the footage, that is it!  he did his job!  He handed over all of what had to be handed over.  I do believe klaas said about a week ago to keep the peace here, and all you can do is keep preaching the same quotes over and over again.  People are getting tired of seeing the same thing, day in and day out.  when is this all going to stop?  I am making a call to Dave tomorrow, along with all the others who have touched base with him, just to let him know what is going on here, and what he thinks about people bashing the crew.  I am sure he wont be too thrilled to see that people are bashing these people who took months out of their lives, and millions to go and search.  I can't believe that people are stooping so low to think any of this!  It only shows some have too much time on their hands.  I am proud to be a monkey, but not with whats been talked about over the last month or so.  Some here don't even know me but despise me, and thats fine.....  i dont care what you think.  i have done my talk, done my walk.  Now lets see some of you do some walking and get up and do something about Natalaee being missing.  Stop the bashing, thats not what this site is about.  Deal with FACTS, now with what someone says to be Gospel.  Trust me, if vicky is who she says she is, and knows who she says she knows, things would have been done by now.... Really, "c'mon" think about it.  Geezzzzz

I am not tired of the quotes.  They are a good reminder.

Why don't you just call Dave tonight?

What is wrong with you people? I am so sorry, I had to jump in.
How self righteous can you get? That is ridiculous. How dare you slander someone you don't even know.
OMG! Kyle walked away from his trip to Aruba with a funny feeling and expressed his feelings to people who love Natalee just the same as you all do...in the Freebirds Forum where it could be openly discussed amongst others with the same principals...those dedicated to justice for Natalee...how dare you question his integrity or the integrity of his daughter's name. What happened to you all? I just can't believe it.
Like it or not, I am friends with Jug Twitty. Like it or not, he CAN speak for Beth. Like it or not, I have copied and pasted every slanderous post you have made against Kyle and the crew of the Persistence. Believe it or not, Jug has made contact with Kyle and Kyle with Jug over this BS and I can assure you, Jug thinks this is all BS!!!! Make fun of the exclamation points if you must, I am just so disappointed in what is happening here. So is Jug, so is Kyle who busted his butt to bring Natalee home.
This is wrong what you are doing, so wrong!!! Trust me when I tell you Natalee's family members are aware of what you all have accused Kyle and the crew of the Persistence of, they have Kyle's email address and telephone number, and they have nothing but RESPECT for what that man did in Aruba. This nonsense has got to stop. How can you all be so mean and spitefull to people who put their everything into bringing Natalee home to her family?


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #787 12/24/08 -
Post by: Magnolia on December 29, 2008, 11:02:23 PM
There are so few of us left here that I have to wonder why
the others went away to the secret hidey hole.

A rational mind would have to question the actions of Kyle
and Silvetti as to what was found in that fish cage.
Kyle said on this forum that human remains were found.
I want to know whose remain were there and where those
remains are now.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #787 12/24/08 -
Post by: texasmom on December 29, 2008, 11:03:25 PM
Anyone watching E?  Is it good?

I'm watching Klaas.  Yes it's good; it's basically about the Peter/Patrick/Joran confession tapes.  It has also shown Beth's journey to that point.  (They showed Beth's speech after the Kalpoe's brothers release; breaks my heart everytime no matter how many times I see and hear it.)  Showed Beth going to Holland and meeting with Peter concerning the confession.   Ended with interviews with Joran denying anything and everything of course.  I've probably left out some stuff, I've been on here and watching too.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #787 12/24/08 -
Post by: truthseeker2 on December 29, 2008, 11:06:11 PM

What is wrong with you people? I am so sorry, I had to jump in.
How self righteous can you get? That is ridiculous. How dare you slander someone you don't even know.
OMG! Kyle walked away from his trip to Aruba with a funny feeling and expressed his feelings to people who love Natalee just the same as you all do...in the Freebirds Forum where it could be openly discussed amongst others with the same principals...those dedicated to justice for Natalee...how dare you question his integrity or the integrity of his daughter's name. What happened to you all? I just can't believe it.
Like it or not, I am friends with Jug Twitty. Like it or not, he CAN speak for Beth. Like it or not, I have copied and pasted every slanderous post you have made against Kyle and the crew of the Persistence. Believe it or not, Jug has made contact with Kyle and Kyle with Jug over this BS and I can assure you, Jug thinks this is all BS!!!! Make fun of the exclamation points if you must, I am just so disappointed in what is happening here. So is Jug, so is Kyle who busted his butt to bring Natalee home.
This is wrong what you are doing, so wrong!!! Trust me when I tell you Natalee's family members are aware of what you all have accused Kyle and the crew of the Persistence of, they have Kyle's email address and telephone number, and they have nothing but RESPECT for what that man did in Aruba. This nonsense has got to stop. How can you all be so mean and spitefull to people who put their everything into bringing Natalee home to her family?

How does one get onto that Freebird site?  I sure would like to discuss this case without having to worry about saying anything that will have people fill up two pages of the same quotes over and over and over again.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #787 12/24/08 -
Post by: San on December 29, 2008, 11:07:38 PM
Dear Kyle

You have a precious little daughter.  Please attempt to put yourself in the place of Natalee Holloway's parents and ... ask yourself what your response would have been ...  regarding the happenings encompassing the Persistence undertaking ... once you had set foot on American soil.

Would you have been submitting posts to forums expressing your concerns regarding your observations while on board the Persistence?  Would you be contacting major networks attempting to make a deal? 

Kyle ... according to Edlridge Cleaver ... you can either be part of the solution or part of the problem.

Which is it?

The family deserve to know IF their beloved Natalee's remains had been placed in that trap/cage.

In His Holy Name,

Janet

In His Holy Name,?  You have gone too far!  Several of you seem to think that KYLE was in charge of this trip.  All his job was, was to look at the footage, that is it!  he did his job!  He handed over all of what had to be handed over.  I do believe klaas said about a week ago to keep the peace here, and all you can do is keep preaching the same quotes over and over again.  People are getting tired of seeing the same thing, day in and day out.  when is this all going to stop?  I am making a call to Dave tomorrow, along with all the others who have touched base with him, just to let him know what is going on here, and what he thinks about people bashing the crew.  I am sure he wont be too thrilled to see that people are bashing these people who took months out of their lives, and millions to go and search.  I can't believe that people are stooping so low to think any of this!  It only shows some have too much time on their hands.  I am proud to be a monkey, but not with whats been talked about over the last month or so.  Some here don't even know me but despise me, and thats fine.....  i dont care what you think.  i have done my talk, done my walk.  Now lets see some of you do some walking and get up and do something about Natalaee being missing.  Stop the bashing, thats not what this site is about.  Deal with FACTS, now with what someone says to be Gospel.  Trust me, if vicky is who she says she is, and knows who she says she knows, things would have been done by now.... Really, "c'mon" think about it.  Geezzzzz

I am not tired of the quotes.  They are a good reminder.

Why don't you just call Dave tonight?

What is wrong with you people? I am so sorry, I had to jump in.
How self righteous can you get? That is ridiculous. How dare you slander someone you don't even know.
OMG! Kyle walked away from his trip to Aruba with a funny feeling and expressed his feelings to people who love Natalee just the same as you all do...in the Freebirds Forum where it could be openly discussed amongst others with the same principals...those dedicated to justice for Natalee...how dare you question his integrity or the integrity of his daughter's name. What happened to you all? I just can't believe it.
Like it or not, I am friends with Jug Twitty. Like it or not, he CAN speak for Beth. Like it or not, I have copied and pasted every slanderous post you have made against Kyle and the crew of the Persistence. Believe it or not, Jug has made contact with Kyle and Kyle with Jug over this BS and I can assure you, Jug thinks this is all BS!!!! Make fun of the exclamation points if you must, I am just so disappointed in what is happening here. So is Jug, so is Kyle who busted his butt to bring Natalee home.
This is wrong what you are doing, so wrong!!! Trust me when I tell you Natalee's family members are aware of what you all have accused Kyle and the crew of the Persistence of, they have Kyle's email address and telephone number, and they have nothing but RESPECT for what that man did in Aruba. This nonsense has got to stop. How can you all be so mean and spitefull to people who put their everything into bringing Natalee home to her family?

Keep talking.

Tell Kyle to enjoy reading your copy and pastes.

He is the disappointment.

The truth shall set you free.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #787 12/24/08 -
Post by: wreck on December 29, 2008, 11:09:09 PM
Dear Kyle

You have a precious little daughter.  Please attempt to put yourself in the place of Natalee Holloway's parents and ... ask yourself what your response would have been ...  regarding the happenings encompassing the Persistence undertaking ... once you had set foot on American soil.

Would you have been submitting posts to forums expressing your concerns regarding your observations while on board the Persistence?  Would you be contacting major networks attempting to make a deal? 

Kyle ... according to Edlridge Cleaver ... you can either be part of the solution or part of the problem.

Which is it?

The family deserve to know IF their beloved Natalee's remains had been placed in that trap/cage.

In His Holy Name,

Janet

In His Holy Name,?  You have gone too far!  Several of you seem to think that KYLE was in charge of this trip.  All his job was, was to look at the footage, that is it!  he did his job!  He handed over all of what had to be handed over.  I do believe klaas said about a week ago to keep the peace here, and all you can do is keep preaching the same quotes over and over again.  People are getting tired of seeing the same thing, day in and day out.  when is this all going to stop?  I am making a call to Dave tomorrow, along with all the others who have touched base with him, just to let him know what is going on here, and what he thinks about people bashing the crew.  I am sure he wont be too thrilled to see that people are bashing these people who took months out of their lives, and millions to go and search.  I can't believe that people are stooping so low to think any of this!  It only shows some have too much time on their hands.  I am proud to be a monkey, but not with whats been talked about over the last month or so.  Some here don't even know me but despise me, and thats fine.....  i dont care what you think.  i have done my talk, done my walk.  Now lets see some of you do some walking and get up and do something about Natalaee being missing.  Stop the bashing, thats not what this site is about.  Deal with FACTS, now with what someone says to be Gospel.  Trust me, if vicky is who she says she is, and knows who she says she knows, things would have been done by now.... Really, "c'mon" think about it.  Geezzzzz

I am not tired of the quotes.  They are a good reminder.

Why don't you just call Dave tonight?

What is wrong with you people? I am so sorry, I had to jump in.
How self righteous can you get? That is ridiculous. How dare you slander someone you don't even know.
OMG! Kyle walked away from his trip to Aruba with a funny feeling and expressed his feelings to people who love Natalee just the same as you all do...in the Freebirds Forum where it could be openly discussed amongst others with the same principals...those dedicated to justice for Natalee...how dare you question his integrity or the integrity of his daughter's name. What happened to you all? I just can't believe it.
Like it or not, I am friends with Jug Twitty. Like it or not, he CAN speak for Beth. Like it or not, I have copied and pasted every slanderous post you have made against Kyle and the crew of the Persistence. Believe it or not, Jug has made contact with Kyle and Kyle with Jug over this BS and I can assure you, Jug thinks this is all BS!!!! Make fun of the exclamation points if you must, I am just so disappointed in what is happening here. So is Jug, so is Kyle who busted his butt to bring Natalee home.
This is wrong what you are doing, so wrong!!! Trust me when I tell you Natalee's family members are aware of what you all have accused Kyle and the crew of the Persistence of, they have Kyle's email address and telephone number, and they have nothing but RESPECT for what that man did in Aruba. This nonsense has got to stop. How can you all be so mean and spitefull to people who put their everything into bringing Natalee home to her family?
I have seen no rebuttal to the claims and reasoning that Kermit has shared. None. I asked Red if we were "off base" -- he told us that things were happening "behind the scenes" from the family (Beth.) I got no impression from him that we were "out of line" with our questions.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #787 12/24/08 -
Post by: klaasend on December 29, 2008, 11:09:38 PM
Anyone watching E?  Is it good?

I'm watching Klaas.  Yes it's good; it's basically about the Peter/Patrick/Joran confession tapes.  It has also shown Beth's journey to that point.  (They showed Beth's speech after the Kalpoe's brothers release; breaks my heart everytime no matter how many times I see and hear it.)  Showed Beth going to Holland and meeting with Peter concerning the confession.   Ended with interviews with Joran denying anything and everything of course.  I've probably left out some stuff, I've been on here and watching too.

Thanks Texasmom!  I'm ashamed to say I couldn't find the channel for "E" on my TV.    ::MonkeyWink::  I think it's going to repeat tomorrow though.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #787 12/24/08 -
Post by: Keepthefaith on December 29, 2008, 11:11:52 PM
Dear Kyle

You have a precious little daughter.  Please attempt to put yourself in the place of Natalee Holloway's parents and ... ask yourself what your response would have been ...  regarding the happenings encompassing the Persistence undertaking ... once you had set foot on American soil.

Would you have been submitting posts to forums expressing your concerns regarding your observations while on board the Persistence?  Would you be contacting major networks attempting to make a deal? 

Kyle ... according to Edlridge Cleaver ... you can either be part of the solution or part of the problem.

Which is it?

The family deserve to know IF their beloved Natalee's remains had been placed in that trap/cage.

In His Holy Name,

Janet

In His Holy Name,?  You have gone too far!  Several of you seem to think that KYLE was in charge of this trip.  All his job was, was to look at the footage, that is it!  he did his job!  He handed over all of what had to be handed over.  I do believe klaas said about a week ago to keep the peace here, and all you can do is keep preaching the same quotes over and over again.  People are getting tired of seeing the same thing, day in and day out.  when is this all going to stop?  I am making a call to Dave tomorrow, along with all the others who have touched base with him, just to let him know what is going on here, and what he thinks about people bashing the crew.  I am sure he wont be too thrilled to see that people are bashing these people who took months out of their lives, and millions to go and search.  I can't believe that people are stooping so low to think any of this!  It only shows some have too much time on their hands.  I am proud to be a monkey, but not with whats been talked about over the last month or so.  Some here don't even know me but despise me, and thats fine.....  i dont care what you think.  i have done my talk, done my walk.  Now lets see some of you do some walking and get up and do something about Natalaee being missing.  Stop the bashing, thats not what this site is about.  Deal with FACTS, now with what someone says to be Gospel.  Trust me, if vicky is who she says she is, and knows who she says she knows, things would have been done by now.... Really, "c'mon" think about it.  Geezzzzz

I am not tired of the quotes.  They are a good reminder.

Why don't you just call Dave tonight?

What is wrong with you people? I am so sorry, I had to jump in.
How self righteous can you get? That is ridiculous. How dare you slander someone you don't even know.
OMG! Kyle walked away from his trip to Aruba with a funny feeling and expressed his feelings to people who love Natalee just the same as you all do...in the Freebirds Forum where it could be openly discussed amongst others with the same principals...those dedicated to justice for Natalee...how dare you question his integrity or the integrity of his daughter's name. What happened to you all? I just can't believe it.
Like it or not, I am friends with Jug Twitty. Like it or not, he CAN speak for Beth. Like it or not, I have copied and pasted every slanderous post you have made against Kyle and the crew of the Persistence. Believe it or not, Jug has made contact with Kyle and Kyle with Jug over this BS and I can assure you, Jug thinks this is all BS!!!! Make fun of the exclamation points if you must, I am just so disappointed in what is happening here. So is Jug, so is Kyle who busted his butt to bring Natalee home.
This is wrong what you are doing, so wrong!!! Trust me when I tell you Natalee's family members are aware of what you all have accused Kyle and the crew of the Persistence of, they have Kyle's email address and telephone number, and they have nothing but RESPECT for what that man did in Aruba. This nonsense has got to stop. How can you all be so mean and spitefull to people who put their everything into bringing Natalee home to her family?
I have seen no rebuttal to the claims and reasoning that Kermit has shared. None. I asked Red if we were "off base" -- he told us that things were happening "behind the scenes" from the family (Beth.) I got no impression from him that we were "out of line" with our questions.

I agree Wreck 100%.Again.Many posters have been on here when Kermit was in the middle of posting but didn't refute anything.I find ity strange that people are trying to argue with Kyle's own words.He said it not Kermit,and or anyone else......


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #787 12/24/08 -
Post by: Tamikosmom on December 29, 2008, 11:12:15 PM

... Several of you seem to think that KYLE was in charge of this trip.  All his job was, was to look at the footage, that is it!  he did his job!  He handed over all of what had to be handed over.  I do believe klaas said about a week ago to keep the peace here, and all you can do is keep preaching the same quotes over and over again.  People are getting tired of seeing the same thing, day in and day out.  when is this all going to stop?  I am making a call to Dave tomorrow, along with all the others who have touched base with him, just to let him know what is going on here, and what he thinks about people bashing the crew.  I am sure he wont be too thrilled to see that people are bashing these people who took months out of their lives, and millions to go and search.  I can't believe that people are stooping so low to think any of this!  It only shows some have too much time on their hands.  I am proud to be a monkey, but not with whats been talked about over the last month or so.  Some here don't even know me but despise me, and thats fine.....  i dont care what you think.  i have done my talk, done my walk.  Now lets see some of you do some walking and get up and do something about Natalaee being missing.  Stop the bashing, thats not what this site is about.  Deal with FACTS, now with what someone says to be Gospel.  Trust me, if vicky is who she says she is, and knows who she says she knows, things would have been done by now.... Really, "c'mon" think about it.  Geezzzzz

Hotshot

In my ongoing mission of upholding the family in their contention that a corrupt Aruban investigation has denied Natalee Holloway justice ... I will continue to post over and over and over again Kyle Kingman's perspective regarding the happening which  he observed while employed in a profession capacity on board the Persistence.

I will not stop until the family is aware of ALL of Kyle's words ... words that imply the Persistence undertaking was not about justice for Natalee Holloway ... was not about closure for her family.  I will stop when the family is aware of John Silvetti self-serving actions ... self-serving actions which were a catalyst to THE FINALE' OF THE GREAT ARUBAN COVERUP.

The family deserves to know that Kyle Kingman believes that there is a possibility that Natalee's remains were retrieved by the enemy without so much as a challenge from John Silvetti.

Hotshot ... I would appreciate if you would submit to Dave Holloway the following list of quotes which I have compiled of Kyle's own words regarding the happenings encompassing the Persistence undertaking.

If you are not inclined ... please let me know and ... I will divert from my comfort zone and utilize my own email list.  It was my intentions to wait on Kyle Kingman to step up to the plate and do what is right.

Thank you.

Janet

++++++++


KYLE KINGMAN'S POSTS TO A PRIVATE FORUM

Kyle:
I have not given anything to the FBI since the pictures and statements from Dec 29th

Kyle: None of us gave any statements to the authorities after the 29th. It's possible John Silvetti did, because he was the only one conversing with them after Jan 7th.

Kyle: I've talked with Peter Shouten numerous times back in February. He hasn't seen anything but knows about the blue fabrics. DeVries and Endemol was interested in purchasing the ROV footage and I was working between them, ABC, and CBS to strike a deal.

Kyle: In case it isn't clear.. notice the blue denim-like fabric

Kyle: The Aruban divers were on the police boat, dove from their boat, and returned to their boat.

Kyle: They were immediately whisked away by the Aruban police and not seen of again by us on the 7th

Kyle: John stood back and waited and worked with the Aruban Polis

Kyle: John definitely believed the Arubans at their every word

Kyle: John didn't want Tim Miller on board the Persistence because he said Tim wasn't necessary any more and was a liability

Kyle: John told me then he didn't want to hear me ever mention the trap again.

Kyle: Schafer is sue crazy.

Kyle: I did not feel the same and we had a major difference in opinion. He [John Silvetti] was the one who never pressed ALE to be completely open with us with the trap evidence. I would have forced them to. However, John was the one paying my invoices so I was forced to sit back and hope for the best.

Kyle: We all know it wasn't a blouse, but I believe they were sent some piece of fabric other than the fabric found inside the trap.

Kyle: I've talked with Peter Shouten numerous times back in February. He hasn't seen anything but knows about the blue fabrics. DeVries and Endemol was interested in purchasing the ROV footage and I was working between them, ABC, and CBS to strike a deal.

Kyle: Louis is currently working with someone who I do not know to put together some documentary on the case, the way it was handled, and what happened during the search. I learned this from Tim T. yesterday. Louis was sold on the idea that it will make him a lot of money.

Kyle: The portion of the discolored blue fabric was presumably on the bottom of the fabric. In my opinion this discoloration is not another type of fabric, but rather biological staining or discoloration from biological growth caused from a high organic carbon content and decay. Basically, during decay a biological mat will form around the organics from remains. This is what I believe it is on the bottom of the fabric.

Kyle: John Silvetti told me today that he may be returning to Aruba very soon for a few days.

Kyle: I couldn't get the logs from the Persistence. All things "Holloway" were stripped from the boat once it got back to Louisiana

Kyle: He's [John Silvetti] seriously making plans to open an Aruba office so he can conduct business easier in S. America and that would allow him to do that.

Kyle: It was confirmed by the FBI that they received a fabric sample send by Richardson and that it wasn't a match to Natalee's blouse. I think the video can prove or disprove whatever the FBI was sent was the same object or not. I strongly believe it's blue denim. Everyone I show thinks the same thing without being prompted (including senior ABC execs).

Klye: We're being fed misinformation to keep us searching and out of their way while they cover their asses, destroy evidence, cover their tracks, and keep us out at sea and away from the trap.

Kyle: neither Dave, Robin, or Beth has seen any of the ROV footage aside from what was broadcasted on Dateline or the pictures leaked from the FBI to Dave (and Robin H.). Beth has seen nothing in my knowledge.

Kyle: John is not a believer in the trap. He took ALE's word as gospel that it wasn't case related, yet never studied the videos or bothered to inquire further. He had plans on doing business with Aruba and in S. America and he didn't want to hurt any feelings by talks hinting at lack of complete trust and friendship.

Kyle: Notice the end of the skirt is an identical match to the 90 degree angle in the sand. I believe her left arm was outstretched with her legs slightly bent. I did not edit the legs. I believe the tarp was placed over her and tucked around her, or perhaps tied down. I believe there are several rocks laying on the sand which were placed on the tarp, or inside the tarp over her body which explains their unusual location. Either way, the proportions appear promising.

Kyle: I took the proportions of the body form from the head, to shoulder, to a 90 degree angle which I believed to be the hem line of Natalee's skirt. I then took those proportions and matched them to the photo of Natalee with what she was last seen wearing. The proportions matched within an inch from head, to shoulder, to skirt line. Based on this comparison and with what we believed we saw in the Dec 29th video, Tim Miller contacted the family and told them the 99.9% comment. I told Tim not to do anything until we have forensic results back after the site is processed. Jan 7th we sampled the contents and in my opinion we found the skirt under the sand along with the other items The blue fabric was found right where the skirt is pictured. If it isn't her, it will forever haunt me as a major cosmic WTF.

kyle: Richardson was onboard the Persistence several times and attended the meetings on the boat. You may see a glimpse of him on the Dateline video in the survey room along with Mos standing over my shoulder
 
 
KYLE KINGMAN'S POSTS TO THE SCARED MONKEYS FORUM

JANUARY 26, 2008

oceanexploration
Re: Natalee Case Discussion #715 1/25 -
« Reply #103 on: January 26, 2008, 12:38:25 PM »


Thought you all may find this interesting if you're willing to accept it-

To date, the Aruban police and dive team has been a tremendous help.  They've honestly done a great job. Over the last month we've established a very good working relationship based on openness and trust.  Most of the relationship success was due to getting the media out of the way and working together shoulder to shoulder over time.  We've helped each other however and whenever we can.  They've treated us with decency and respect and we have treated them as friends and allies, which they are. Most of the police and divers are new since this case started and both eager and careful to do things right.  I wish we had a month ahead of the project just to establish the relationships and trust. I know many of you would likely doubt this view, but it's based on the experiences in the field of the entire search team. I too was extremely worried, paranoid, and suspecting in the beginning.  Now, it's clear we're all working towards a common goal.

http://scaredmonkeys.net/index.php?topic=2539.msg332457;topicseen#msg332457
 

MARCH 19, 2008

oceanexploration
Re: Natalee Case Discussion #744 3/19 -
« Reply #201 on: March 19, 2008, 08:21:47 PM »


We had little option other than to have the Aruban dive division recover the samples and bring them back under their care.  Remember we are Americans working in Aruban waters, subject to their laws, invitation, and blessing.  Our hands are tied for the most part. I personally was extremely uncomfortable with the chain of custody, being that we weren't a part of it, but I was powerless to do anything about it.   The samples were photographed in detail by one Aruban diver and the other two investigated the contents of the trap, the dimensions, the rigging, and what surrounded the trap.  From the video, it looked like they did a diligent and careful job with the samples and the underwater photography.  I don't know who has these pictures, but I must assume ALE.

http://scaredmonkeys.net/index.php?topic=2721.msg366857;topicseen#msg366857

 
BROTHER OF BETH HOLLOWAY - SCARED MONKEYS FORUM

private eye
Re: Natalee Case Discussion #746 4/4
« Reply #499 on: April 09, 2008, 12:39:50 AM »


If I understood Kyle correctly, and that would be that the Arubans retrieved and possessed all finds, not sharing anything with the crew, then that effort was a waste of time and effort. The only thing it could have accomplished was to locate additional evidence for the Arubans to destroy. I am not sure if that was the protocol out of Aruba's waters though. The effort was superb, but the game was fixed.

http://scaredmonkeys.net/index.php?topic=2769.msg372245;topicseen#msg372245


THE ROV IMAGES

Re: Natalee Case Discussion #778 11/23/08 -
« Reply #408 on: November 24, 2008, 03:59:08 PM »


http://scaredmonkeys.net/index.php?topic=4173.msg555618#msg555618
 
 
Re: Natalee Case Discussion #778 11/23/08 -
« Reply #410 on: November 24, 2008, 04:01:55 PM »


Photos given to the FBI sent to Dave and Robin posted on the internet are NOT the
photos posted above.  These were not given to the FBI until recently.

http://scaredmonkeys.net/index.php?topic=4173.msg555621#msg555621
 
++++++++++
 
Kyle Kingman
Senior Geophysical Project Manager at Alpine Ocean Seismic Survey Inc.
Greater New York City Area


Current
Senior Geophysical Operations Manager at Alpine Ocean Seismic Survey Inc.
 
Past
Manager at Kingman Geophysical Solutions
 
Education
Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey-New Brunswick
 
Industry
Oil & Energy

++++++++



Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #787 12/24/08 -
Post by: San on December 29, 2008, 11:13:41 PM

What is wrong with you people? I am so sorry, I had to jump in.
How self righteous can you get? That is ridiculous. How dare you slander someone you don't even know.
OMG! Kyle walked away from his trip to Aruba with a funny feeling and expressed his feelings to people who love Natalee just the same as you all do...in the Freebirds Forum where it could be openly discussed amongst others with the same principals...those dedicated to justice for Natalee...how dare you question his integrity or the integrity of his daughter's name. What happened to you all? I just can't believe it.
Like it or not, I am friends with Jug Twitty. Like it or not, he CAN speak for Beth. Like it or not, I have copied and pasted every slanderous post you have made against Kyle and the crew of the Persistence. Believe it or not, Jug has made contact with Kyle and Kyle with Jug over this BS and I can assure you, Jug thinks this is all BS!!!! Make fun of the exclamation points if you must, I am just so disappointed in what is happening here. So is Jug, so is Kyle who busted his butt to bring Natalee home.
This is wrong what you are doing, so wrong!!! Trust me when I tell you Natalee's family members are aware of what you all have accused Kyle and the crew of the Persistence of, they have Kyle's email address and telephone number, and they have nothing but RESPECT for what that man did in Aruba. This nonsense has got to stop. How can you all be so mean and spitefull to people who put their everything into bringing Natalee home to her family?

How does one get onto that Freebird site?  I sure would like to discuss this case without having to worry about saying anything that will have people fill up two pages of the same quotes over and over and over again.

I'm sure you will be getting an email soon.  If not I guess you are stuck here with us people who have no principals and are nuts.

I stand with the nuts.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #787 12/24/08 -
Post by: Keepthefaith on December 29, 2008, 11:15:14 PM

What is wrong with you people? I am so sorry, I had to jump in.
How self righteous can you get? That is ridiculous. How dare you slander someone you don't even know.
OMG! Kyle walked away from his trip to Aruba with a funny feeling and expressed his feelings to people who love Natalee just the same as you all do...in the Freebirds Forum where it could be openly discussed amongst others with the same principals...those dedicated to justice for Natalee...how dare you question his integrity or the integrity of his daughter's name. What happened to you all? I just can't believe it.
Like it or not, I am friends with Jug Twitty. Like it or not, he CAN speak for Beth. Like it or not, I have copied and pasted every slanderous post you have made against Kyle and the crew of the Persistence. Believe it or not, Jug has made contact with Kyle and Kyle with Jug over this BS and I can assure you, Jug thinks this is all BS!!!! Make fun of the exclamation points if you must, I am just so disappointed in what is happening here. So is Jug, so is Kyle who busted his butt to bring Natalee home.
This is wrong what you are doing, so wrong!!! Trust me when I tell you Natalee's family members are aware of what you all have accused Kyle and the crew of the Persistence of, they have Kyle's email address and telephone number, and they have nothing but RESPECT for what that man did in Aruba. This nonsense has got to stop. How can you all be so mean and spitefull to people who put their everything into bringing Natalee home to her family?

How does one get onto that Freebird site?  I sure would like to discuss this case without having to worry about saying anything that will have people fill up two pages of the same quotes over and over and over again.

I'm sure you will be getting an email soon.  If not I guess you are stuck here with us people who have no principals and are nuts.

I stand with the nuts.

 ::MonkeyDance:: Scared Monkey's. ::MonkeyDance::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #787 12/24/08 -
Post by: truthseeker2 on December 29, 2008, 11:17:00 PM

How does one get onto that Freebird site?  I sure would like to discuss this case without having to worry about saying anything that will have people fill up two pages of the same quotes over and over and over again.

I'm sure you will be getting an email soon.  If not I guess you are stuck here with us people who have no principals and are nuts.

I stand with the nuts.

Well, that just proved my point.  Either you agree with the Kyle-bashing...or you might as well not post here anymore.  Sad,  Really sad.



Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #787 12/24/08 -
Post by: San on December 29, 2008, 11:18:57 PM

How does one get onto that Freebird site?  I sure would like to discuss this case without having to worry about saying anything that will have people fill up two pages of the same quotes over and over and over again.

I'm sure you will be getting an email soon.  If not I guess you are stuck here with us people who have no principals and are nuts.

I stand with the nuts.

Well, that just proved my point.  Either you agree with the Kyle-bashing...or you might as well not post here anymore.  Sad,  Really sad.


I didn't prove any point.  Your post was unwarranted.  I have not bashed Kyle.  The only two people who I see bashing is Hotshot and ldstlou.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #787 12/24/08 -
Post by: ldstlou on December 29, 2008, 11:20:17 PM

What is wrong with you people? I am so sorry, I had to jump in.
How self righteous can you get? That is ridiculous. How dare you slander someone you don't even know.
OMG! Kyle walked away from his trip to Aruba with a funny feeling and expressed his feelings to people who love Natalee just the same as you all do...in the Freebirds Forum where it could be openly discussed amongst others with the same principals...those dedicated to justice for Natalee...how dare you question his integrity or the integrity of his daughter's name. What happened to you all? I just can't believe it.
Like it or not, I am friends with Jug Twitty. Like it or not, he CAN speak for Beth. Like it or not, I have copied and pasted every slanderous post you have made against Kyle and the crew of the Persistence. Believe it or not, Jug has made contact with Kyle and Kyle with Jug over this BS and I can assure you, Jug thinks this is all BS!!!! Make fun of the exclamation points if you must, I am just so disappointed in what is happening here. So is Jug, so is Kyle who busted his butt to bring Natalee home.
This is wrong what you are doing, so wrong!!! Trust me when I tell you Natalee's family members are aware of what you all have accused Kyle and the crew of the Persistence of, they have Kyle's email address and telephone number, and they have nothing but RESPECT for what that man did in Aruba. This nonsense has got to stop. How can you all be so mean and spitefull to people who put their everything into bringing Natalee home to her family?

How does one get onto that Freebird site?  I sure would like to discuss this case without having to worry about saying anything that will have people fill up two pages of the same quotes over and over and over again.

I have no idea, I was never asked...nor  am I offended by that. I don't know what everyone is talking about either when they speak of the "private forums" that have been created lately. Nor have I talked to Kyle in weeks. I was satisfied with what he told me after I spoke with him. He is what you all once thought he was...a very intelligent young man who threw his heart into Natalee's case just the same as all of us did.
I have real problem with Kermit. I know it will tick you off...but I have to speak my piece. If she had been honest and said..look...I am a member of Freebirds and Kyle was alarmed by some things that went down in Aruba and I want to share them with you because no one can dissect the truth like the Monkeys can...so I want to share his concerns with you. He can't due to confidentiality agreements but I feel the info is worth breaking my confidentiality agreement so here it is...then she would have my utmost respect. But that is not the way she chose to do it. Instread she took Kyle's concerns and turned them into some "conspiracy" that she "alone uncovered" and in the process...bastardized everything the members of the Persistence did.  I scream out and use my explanation points not out of some love for Kyle, but out of my own sense of right and wrong. I am sorry if you don't understand that.
Kyle owes you all nothing, he owes me nothing!! I didn't know the man when this all started but I have his email just the same as you all do and I respected him enough to send him a note and he respected me enough to answer. That is all!! Jeeze...can you all imagine what would have happened if you had given him the same consideration?


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #787 12/24/08 -
Post by: Magnolia on December 29, 2008, 11:22:05 PM

I'm sure you will be getting an email soon.  If not I guess you are stuck here with us people who have no principals and are nuts.

I stand with the nuts.


************************************************************

I don't think I have ever been so proud to be a Nutty Monkey. ::MonkeyTongue::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #787 12/24/08 -
Post by: klaasend on December 29, 2008, 11:23:06 PM

How does one get onto that Freebird site?  I sure would like to discuss this case without having to worry about saying anything that will have people fill up two pages of the same quotes over and over and over again.

I'm sure you will be getting an email soon.  If not I guess you are stuck here with us people who have no principals and are nuts.

I stand with the nuts.

Well, that just proved my point.  Either you agree with the Kyle-bashing...or you might as well not post here anymore.  Sad,  Really sad.



EXCUSE ME?  Nobody is bashing Kyle we are only seeking an explanation of what appears to be some pretty damning words out of HIS mouth. 

Nobody is saying you have to agree with ANYONE.  OTHERS are trying to tell us what we can discuss and research here and they have no right to.  Nothing is beyond discussion.  NOTHING.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #787 12/24/08 -
Post by: Keepthefaith on December 29, 2008, 11:24:19 PM

What is wrong with you people? I am so sorry, I had to jump in.
How self righteous can you get? That is ridiculous. How dare you slander someone you don't even know.
OMG! Kyle walked away from his trip to Aruba with a funny feeling and expressed his feelings to people who love Natalee just the same as you all do...in the Freebirds Forum where it could be openly discussed amongst others with the same principals...those dedicated to justice for Natalee...how dare you question his integrity or the integrity of his daughter's name. What happened to you all? I just can't believe it.
Like it or not, I am friends with Jug Twitty. Like it or not, he CAN speak for Beth. Like it or not, I have copied and pasted every slanderous post you have made against Kyle and the crew of the Persistence. Believe it or not, Jug has made contact with Kyle and Kyle with Jug over this BS and I can assure you, Jug thinks this is all BS!!!! Make fun of the exclamation points if you must, I am just so disappointed in what is happening here. So is Jug, so is Kyle who busted his butt to bring Natalee home.
This is wrong what you are doing, so wrong!!! Trust me when I tell you Natalee's family members are aware of what you all have accused Kyle and the crew of the Persistence of, they have Kyle's email address and telephone number, and they have nothing but RESPECT for what that man did in Aruba. This nonsense has got to stop. How can you all be so mean and spitefull to people who put their everything into bringing Natalee home to her family?

How does one get onto that Freebird site?  I sure would like to discuss this case without having to worry about saying anything that will have people fill up two pages of the same quotes over and over and over again.

I have no idea, I was never asked...nor  am I offended by that. I don't know what everyone is talking about either when they speak of the "private forums" that have been created lately. Nor have I talked to Kyle in weeks. I was satisfied with what he told me after I spoke with him. He is what you all once thought he was...a very intelligent young man who threw his heart into Natalee's case just the same as all of us did.
I have real problem with Kermit. I know it will tick you off...but I have to speak my piece. If she had been honest and said..look...I am a member of Freebirds and Kyle was alarmed by some things that went down in Aruba and I want to share them with you because no one can dissect the truth like the Monkeys can...so I want to share his concerns with you. He can't due to confidentiality agreements but I feel the info is worth breaking my confidentiality agreement  so here it is...then she would have my utmost respect. But that is not the way she chose to do it. Instread she took Kyle's concerns and turned them into some "conspiracy" that she "alone uncovered" and in the process...bastardized everything the members of the Persistence did.  I scream out and use my explanation points not out of some love for Kyle, but out of my own sense of right and wrong. I am sorry if you don't understand that.
Kyle owes you all nothing, he owes me nothing!! I didn't know the man when this all started but I have his email just the same as you all do and I respected him enough to send him a note and he respected me enough to answer. That is all!! Jeeze...can you all imagine what would have happened if you had given him the same consideration?

Confidentialty agreement?With whom?


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #787 12/24/08 -
Post by: ldstlou on December 29, 2008, 11:24:40 PM

How does one get onto that Freebird site?  I sure would like to discuss this case without having to worry about saying anything that will have people fill up two pages of the same quotes over and over and over again.

I'm sure you will be getting an email soon.  If not I guess you are stuck here with us people who have no principals and are nuts.

I stand with the nuts.

Well, that just proved my point.  Either you agree with the Kyle-bashing...or you might as well not post here anymore.  Sad,  Really sad.


I didn't prove any point.  Your post was unwarranted.  I have not bashed Kyle.  The only two people who I see bashing is Hotshot and ldstlou.

baloney San, you have a beef...I don't know why or where it came from...but you have a beef. When did I ever disrespect anyone here. I had nothing but the utmost respect for everyone on this board. I don't know what happened...but it changed.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #787 12/24/08 -
Post by: klaasend on December 29, 2008, 11:27:10 PM
I don't understand how posting Kyle's own words is bashing Kyle.  If Kyle's words are being taken out of context then he can refute them. 


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #787 12/24/08 -
Post by: Red on December 29, 2008, 11:28:32 PM
Folks I think some are missing an important point here.

I can respect those that are willing to help search for Natalee. I can respect those that help search for any missing person. However, there is a purpose and a stated goal when going into such a mission.

It is ok to question, in fact, that is what SM is all about. If one never questions, one is only propaganda. I questioned many things about this search from the outset and received some pretty hostile and petty emails back in return questioning my loyalties. If you want to see bashing ... I'll show ya bashing and making ill comments when some have less than a clue.

Some people who got involved in this case and were late to the show really should have listened, read and became more learned before they acted as if they knew everything. Do not ever forget that long before there was an ocean search ... there was one on land.

Do I applaud the Persistence and their efforts, of course I do. Do I also scratch my head and ask why with a known budget and time did they not search more targets than map a larger area and leave things unsearched ... of course I do. When one builds a home, one usually does so in an effort to complete the structure with a roof and 4 walls, not just making a larger home unfinished. That kind of makes no sense.

Do I question the fact that there was an exclusive media deal when promises were made to provide SM with pics and info long before the Persistence ever left port, yup. Do I question why there was a beg for money all the while they knew they were pulling out ... yes I do.

Folks, questioning provides accountability. That is a real important thing in life. Do not ever accept anything hook, line and sinker. Many of you have questioned me in the past or you have questioned Tim. There is nothing wrong with that. If I point forth a premise or something that was done, I would expect people to question and want more than just accept what's stated. That's what makes the internet the internet. It is not for the faint of heart.

Are people perfect ... nope, not by a long shot. However, acting rude to those that have been a apart of this story and searched long before it was ever the en vogue thing to do and without a "Date Line" exclusive is hardly a way to gain favor. If you want attacked, maybe I should share some emails.

Questioning is not attacking. I would say as always be civil ... however, making people accountable to questioning is an important part of life. One better be able to hold up to questions and defend their point of view. Especially if one wants to be on the net.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #787 12/24/08 -
Post by: ldstlou on December 29, 2008, 11:29:03 PM

What is wrong with you people? I am so sorry, I had to jump in.
How self righteous can you get? That is ridiculous. How dare you slander someone you don't even know.
OMG! Kyle walked away from his trip to Aruba with a funny feeling and expressed his feelings to people who love Natalee just the same as you all do...in the Freebirds Forum where it could be openly discussed amongst others with the same principals...those dedicated to justice for Natalee...how dare you question his integrity or the integrity of his daughter's name. What happened to you all? I just can't believe it.
Like it or not, I am friends with Jug Twitty. Like it or not, he CAN speak for Beth. Like it or not, I have copied and pasted every slanderous post you have made against Kyle and the crew of the Persistence. Believe it or not, Jug has made contact with Kyle and Kyle with Jug over this BS and I can assure you, Jug thinks this is all BS!!!! Make fun of the exclamation points if you must, I am just so disappointed in what is happening here. So is Jug, so is Kyle who busted his butt to bring Natalee home.
This is wrong what you are doing, so wrong!!! Trust me when I tell you Natalee's family members are aware of what you all have accused Kyle and the crew of the Persistence of, they have Kyle's email address and telephone number, and they have nothing but RESPECT for what that man did in Aruba. This nonsense has got to stop. How can you all be so mean and spitefull to people who put their everything into bringing Natalee home to her family?

How does one get onto that Freebird site?  I sure would like to discuss this case without having to worry about saying anything that will have people fill up two pages of the same quotes over and over and over again.

I have no idea, I was never asked...nor  am I offended by that. I don't know what everyone is talking about either when they speak of the "private forums" that have been created lately. Nor have I talked to Kyle in weeks. I was satisfied with what he told me after I spoke with him. He is what you all once thought he was...a very intelligent young man who threw his heart into Natalee's case just the same as all of us did.
I have real problem with Kermit. I know it will tick you off...but I have to speak my piece. If she had been honest and said..look...I am a member of Freebirds and Kyle was alarmed by some things that went down in Aruba and I want to share them with you because no one can dissect the truth like the Monkeys can...so I want to share his concerns with you. He can't due to confidentiality agreements but I feel the info is worth breaking my confidentiality agreement  so here it is...then she would have my utmost respect. But that is not the way she chose to do it. Instread she took Kyle's concerns and turned them into some "conspiracy" that she "alone uncovered" and in the process...bastardized everything the members of the Persistence did.  I scream out and use my explanation points not out of some love for Kyle, but out of my own sense of right and wrong. I am sorry if you don't understand that.
Kyle owes you all nothing, he owes me nothing!! I didn't know the man when this all started but I have his email just the same as you all do and I respected him enough to send him a note and he respected me enough to answer. That is all!! Jeeze...can you all imagine what would have happened if you had given him the same consideration?

Confidentialty agreement?With whom?

Two...Kyle had a confidentiality agreement with the ship he was on...the Persitence...which is standard, and one with the Freebirds which Kermit agreed to when she joined. Is his career affected by what Kermit did? Absolutely!!! Did he try and cover up the finding of Natalee? No!! And just like Beth and Dave and Jug walked away from Aruba feeling as though "something went wrong" so did Kyle. And it was because of that feeling he joined the Freebirds and openly discussed with other members his concerns.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #787 12/24/08 -
Post by: San on December 29, 2008, 11:30:50 PM

How does one get onto that Freebird site?  I sure would like to discuss this case without having to worry about saying anything that will have people fill up two pages of the same quotes over and over and over again.

I'm sure you will be getting an email soon.  If not I guess you are stuck here with us people who have no principals and are nuts.

I stand with the nuts.

Well, that just proved my point.  Either you agree with the Kyle-bashing...or you might as well not post here anymore.  Sad,  Really sad.


I didn't prove any point.  Your post was unwarranted.  I have not bashed Kyle.  The only two people who I see bashing is Hotshot and ldstlou.

baloney San, you have a beef...I don't know why or where it came from...but you have a beef. When did I ever disrespect anyone here. I had nothing but the utmost respect for everyone on this board. I don't know what happened...but it changed.

I think you need to go back and read your posts.

I have a beef when people are disrespectful.

This is the way I see things.

Kyle said things and Kermit said things.  We can't believe both.  It is a he said she said game.  It's about choices.  I chose to believe what Kermit put in front of us until we are proven wrong.

You and others are getting pissed at people because we have questions and want them answered.  This is what Scared Monkeys is all about.  It's about finding out the truth.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #787 12/24/08 -
Post by: truthseeker2 on December 29, 2008, 11:31:37 PM

How does one get onto that Freebird site?  I sure would like to discuss this case without having to worry about saying anything that will have people fill up two pages of the same quotes over and over and over again.

I'm sure you will be getting an email soon.  If not I guess you are stuck here with us people who have no principals and are nuts.

I stand with the nuts.

Well, that just proved my point.  Either you agree with the Kyle-bashing...or you might as well not post here anymore.  Sad,  Really sad.


I didn't prove any point.  Your post was unwarranted.  I have not bashed Kyle.  The only two people who I see bashing is Hotshot and ldstlou.

You're kidding, right?  People have trashed someone who posted here for weeks now, and MY post is unwarranted?  Please.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #787 12/24/08 -
Post by: Keepthefaith on December 29, 2008, 11:33:28 PM

What is wrong with you people? I am so sorry, I had to jump in.
How self righteous can you get? That is ridiculous. How dare you slander someone you don't even know.
OMG! Kyle walked away from his trip to Aruba with a funny feeling and expressed his feelings to people who love Natalee just the same as you all do...in the Freebirds Forum where it could be openly discussed amongst others with the same principals...those dedicated to justice for Natalee...how dare you question his integrity or the integrity of his daughter's name. What happened to you all? I just can't believe it.
Like it or not, I am friends with Jug Twitty. Like it or not, he CAN speak for Beth. Like it or not, I have copied and pasted every slanderous post you have made against Kyle and the crew of the Persistence. Believe it or not, Jug has made contact with Kyle and Kyle with Jug over this BS and I can assure you, Jug thinks this is all BS!!!! Make fun of the exclamation points if you must, I am just so disappointed in what is happening here. So is Jug, so is Kyle who busted his butt to bring Natalee home.
This is wrong what you are doing, so wrong!!! Trust me when I tell you Natalee's family members are aware of what you all have accused Kyle and the crew of the Persistence of, they have Kyle's email address and telephone number, and they have nothing but RESPECT for what that man did in Aruba. This nonsense has got to stop. How can you all be so mean and spitefull to people who put their everything into bringing Natalee home to her family?

How does one get onto that Freebird site?  I sure would like to discuss this case without having to worry about saying anything that will have people fill up two pages of the same quotes over and over and over again.

I have no idea, I was never asked...nor  am I offended by that. I don't know what everyone is talking about either when they speak of the "private forums" that have been created lately. Nor have I talked to Kyle in weeks. I was satisfied with what he told me after I spoke with him. He is what you all once thought he was...a very intelligent young man who threw his heart into Natalee's case just the same as all of us did.
I have real problem with Kermit. I know it will tick you off...but I have to speak my piece. If she had been honest and said..look...I am a member of Freebirds and Kyle was alarmed by some things that went down in Aruba and I want to share them with you because no one can dissect the truth like the Monkeys can...so I want to share his concerns with you. He can't due to confidentiality agreements but I feel the info is worth breaking my confidentiality agreement  so here it is...then she would have my utmost respect. But that is not the way she chose to do it. Instread she took Kyle's concerns and turned them into some "conspiracy" that she "alone uncovered" and in the process...bastardized everything the members of the Persistence did.  I scream out and use my explanation points not out of some love for Kyle, but out of my own sense of right and wrong. I am sorry if you don't understand that.
Kyle owes you all nothing, he owes me nothing!! I didn't know the man when this all started but I have his email just the same as you all do and I respected him enough to send him a note and he respected me enough to answer. That is all!! Jeeze...can you all imagine what would have happened if you had given him the same consideration?

Confidentialty agreement?With whom?

Two...Kyle had a confidentiality agreement with the ship he was on...the Persitence...which is standard, and one with the Freebirds which Kermit agreed to when she joined. Is his career affected by what Kermit did? Absolutely!!! Did he try and cover up the finding of Natalee? No!! And just like Beth and Dave and Jug walked away from Aruba feeling as though "something went wrong" so did Kyle. And it was because of that feeling he joined the Freebirds and openly discussed with other members his concerns.

So you are a Freebird?I was asking what confidentiality agreement you were breaking?Are we not talking about Kyle's own concern's regarding the Persistence from his own mouth??


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #787 12/24/08 -
Post by: klaasend on December 29, 2008, 11:33:52 PM
Folks I think some are missing an important point here.

I can respect those that are willing to help search for Natalee. I can respect those that help search for any missing person. However, there is a purpose and a stated goal when going into such a mission.

It is ok to question, in fact, that is what SM is all about. If one never questions, one is only propaganda. I questioned many things about this search from the outset and received some pretty hostile and petty emails back in return questioning my loyalties. If you want to see bashing ... I'll show ya bashing and making ill comments when some have less than a clue.

Some people who got involved in this case and were late to the show really should have listened, read and became more learned before they acted as if they knew everything. Do not ever forget that long before there was an ocean search ... there was one on land.

Do I applaud the Persistence and their efforts, of course I do. Do I also scratch my head and ask why with a known budget and time did they not search more targets than map a larger area and leave things unsearched ... of course I do. When one builds a home, one usually does so in an effort to complete the structure with a roof and 4 walls, not just making a larger home unfinished. That kind of makes no sense.

Do I question the fact that there was an exclusive media deal when promises were made to provide SM with pics and info long before the Persistence ever left port, yup. Do I question why there was a beg for money all the while they knew they were pulling out ... yes I do.

Folks, questioning provides accountability. That is a real important thing in life. Do not ever accept anything hook, line and sinker. Many of you have questioned me in the past or you have questioned Tim. There is nothing wrong with that. If I point forth a premise or something that was done, I would expect people to question and want more than just accept what's stated. That's what makes the internet the internet. It is not for the faint of heart.

Are people perfect ... nope, not by a long shot. However, acting rude to those that have been a apart of this story and searched long before it was ever the en vogue thing to do and without a "Date Line" exclusive is hardly a way to gain favor. If you want attacked, maybe I should share some emails.

Questioning is not attacking. I would say as always be civil ... however, making people accountable to questioning is an important part of life. One better be able to hold up to questions and defend their point of view. Especially if one wants to be on the net.

Thank you Red, you said it better than I.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #787 12/24/08 -
Post by: ldstlou on December 29, 2008, 11:35:37 PM
Folks I think some are missing an important point here.

I can respect those that are willing to help search for Natalee. I can respect those that help search for any missing person. However, there is a purpose and a stated goal when going into such a mission.

It is ok to question, in fact, that is what SM is all about. If one never questions, one is only propaganda. I questioned many things about this search from the outset and received some pretty hostile and petty emails back in return questioning my loyalties. If you want to see bashing ... I'll show ya bashing and making ill comments when some have less than a clue.

Some people who got involved in this case and were late to the show really should have listened, read and became more learned before they acted as if they knew everything. Do not ever forget that long before there was an ocean search ... there was one on land.

Do I applaud the Persistence and their efforts, of course I do. Do I also scratch my head and ask why with a known budget and time did they not search more targets than map a larger area and leave things unsearched ... of course I do. When one builds a home, one usually does so in an effort to complete the structure with a roof and 4 walls, not just making a larger home unfinished. That kind of makes no sense.

Do I question the fact that there was an exclusive media deal when promises were made to provide SM with pics and info long before the Persistence ever left port, yup. Do I question why there was a beg for money all the while they knew they were pulling out ... yes I do.

Folks, questioning provides accountability. That is a real important thing in life. Do not ever accept anything hook, line and sinker. Many of you have questioned me in the past or you have questioned Tim. There is nothing wrong with that. If I point forth a premise or something that was done, I would expect people to question and want more than just accept what's stated. That's what makes the internet the internet. It is not for the faint of heart.

Are people perfect ... nope, not by a long shot. However, acting rude to those that have been a apart of this story and searched long before it was ever the en vogue thing to do and without a "Date Line" exclusive is hardly a way to gain favor. If you want attacked, maybe I should share some emails.

Questioning is not attacking. I would say as always be civil ... however, making people accountable to questioning is an important part of life. One better be able to hold up to questions and defend their point of view. Especially if one wants to be on the net.

Great points Red. And I am not calling anyone a hero here...we have all done what we thought was right...for our love of Natalee. But I remember the pics of you and Dave digging through the landfill and getting so sick in the process. I also remember people criticising what you did and the Monkeys going to bat for you. You, as well as Beth and Dave and Jug know what it is like trying to operate in that godforsaken island. Why so hard on the Persistence who busted their azzes to do the same thing we have been trying to do since Natalee went missing? That is all I ask.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #787 12/24/08 -
Post by: Edward on December 29, 2008, 11:36:37 PM

What is wrong with you people? I am so sorry, I had to jump in.
How self righteous can you get? That is ridiculous. How dare you slander someone you don't even know.
OMG! Kyle walked away from his trip to Aruba with a funny feeling and expressed his feelings to people who love Natalee just the same as you all do...in the Freebirds Forum where it could be openly discussed amongst others with the same principals...those dedicated to justice for Natalee...how dare you question his integrity or the integrity of his daughter's name. What happened to you all? I just can't believe it.
Like it or not, I am friends with Jug Twitty. Like it or not, he CAN speak for Beth. Like it or not, I have copied and pasted every slanderous post you have made against Kyle and the crew of the Persistence. Believe it or not, Jug has made contact with Kyle and Kyle with Jug over this BS and I can assure you, Jug thinks this is all BS!!!! Make fun of the exclamation points if you must, I am just so disappointed in what is happening here. So is Jug, so is Kyle who busted his butt to bring Natalee home.
This is wrong what you are doing, so wrong!!! Trust me when I tell you Natalee's family members are aware of what you all have accused Kyle and the crew of the Persistence of, they have Kyle's email address and telephone number, and they have nothing but RESPECT for what that man did in Aruba. This nonsense has got to stop. How can you all be so mean and spitefull to people who put their everything into bringing Natalee home to her family?

How does one get onto that Freebird site?  I sure would like to discuss this case without having to worry about saying anything that will have people fill up two pages of the same quotes over and over and over again.

I'm sure you will be getting an email soon.  If not I guess you are stuck here with us people who have no principals and are nuts.

I stand with the nuts.

 ::MonkeyDance:: Scared Monkey's. ::MonkeyDance::

 The Monkeys are made up of a diverse group of Americans who own a first amenment right to free speech and right or wrong in thier individual opinons they all have good intension. which is to find the truth in a world built on lies.
:smt109 :smt038 :smt041 :smt023

God Bless the Monkeys
 :smt059 :2notworthy:


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #787 12/24/08 -
Post by: ldstlou on December 29, 2008, 11:37:03 PM
Folks I think some are missing an important point here.

I can respect those that are willing to help search for Natalee. I can respect those that help search for any missing person. However, there is a purpose and a stated goal when going into such a mission.

It is ok to question, in fact, that is what SM is all about. If one never questions, one is only propaganda. I questioned many things about this search from the outset and received some pretty hostile and petty emails back in return questioning my loyalties. If you want to see bashing ... I'll show ya bashing and making ill comments when some have less than a clue.

Some people who got involved in this case and were late to the show really should have listened, read and became more learned before they acted as if they knew everything. Do not ever forget that long before there was an ocean search ... there was one on land.

Do I applaud the Persistence and their efforts, of course I do. Do I also scratch my head and ask why with a known budget and time did they not search more targets than map a larger area and leave things unsearched ... of course I do. When one builds a home, one usually does so in an effort to complete the structure with a roof and 4 walls, not just making a larger home unfinished. That kind of makes no sense.

Do I question the fact that there was an exclusive media deal when promises were made to provide SM with pics and info long before the Persistence ever left port, yup. Do I question why there was a beg for money all the while they knew they were pulling out ... yes I do.

Folks, questioning provides accountability. That is a real important thing in life. Do not ever accept anything hook, line and sinker. Many of you have questioned me in the past or you have questioned Tim. There is nothing wrong with that. If I point forth a premise or something that was done, I would expect people to question and want more than just accept what's stated. That's what makes the internet the internet. It is not for the faint of heart.

Are people perfect ... nope, not by a long shot. However, acting rude to those that have been a apart of this story and searched long before it was ever the en vogue thing to do and without a "Date Line" exclusive is hardly a way to gain favor. If you want attacked, maybe I should share some emails.

Questioning is not attacking. I would say as always be civil ... however, making people accountable to questioning is an important part of life. One better be able to hold up to questions and defend their point of view. Especially if one wants to be on the net.

Great points Red. And I am not calling anyone a hero here...we have all done what we thought was right...for our love of Natalee. But I remember the pics of you and Dave digging through the landfill and getting so sick in the process. I also remember people criticising what you did and the Monkeys going to bat for you. You, as well as Beth and Dave and Jug know what it is like trying to operate in that godforsaken island. Why so hard on the Persistence who busted their azzes to do the same thing we have been trying to do since Natalee went missing? That is all I ask.

Hindsight is always 20/20...and we all would have done things differently...if we knew what would happen in hindsight...jmho


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #787 12/24/08 -
Post by: Keepthefaith on December 29, 2008, 11:39:30 PM

What is wrong with you people? I am so sorry, I had to jump in.
How self righteous can you get? That is ridiculous. How dare you slander someone you don't even know.
OMG! Kyle walked away from his trip to Aruba with a funny feeling and expressed his feelings to people who love Natalee just the same as you all do...in the Freebirds Forum where it could be openly discussed amongst others with the same principals...those dedicated to justice for Natalee...how dare you question his integrity or the integrity of his daughter's name. What happened to you all? I just can't believe it.
Like it or not, I am friends with Jug Twitty. Like it or not, he CAN speak for Beth. Like it or not, I have copied and pasted every slanderous post you have made against Kyle and the crew of the Persistence. Believe it or not, Jug has made contact with Kyle and Kyle with Jug over this BS and I can assure you, Jug thinks this is all BS!!!! Make fun of the exclamation points if you must, I am just so disappointed in what is happening here. So is Jug, so is Kyle who busted his butt to bring Natalee home.
This is wrong what you are doing, so wrong!!! Trust me when I tell you Natalee's family members are aware of what you all have accused Kyle and the crew of the Persistence of, they have Kyle's email address and telephone number, and they have nothing but RESPECT for what that man did in Aruba. This nonsense has got to stop. How can you all be so mean and spitefull to people who put their everything into bringing Natalee home to her family?

How does one get onto that Freebird site?  I sure would like to discuss this case without having to worry about saying anything that will have people fill up two pages of the same quotes over and over and over again.

I have no idea, I was never asked...nor  am I offended by that. I don't know what everyone is talking about either when they speak of the "private forums" that have been created lately. Nor have I talked to Kyle in weeks. I was satisfied with what he told me after I spoke with him. He is what you all once thought he was...a very intelligent young man who threw his heart into Natalee's case just the same as all of us did.
I have real problem with Kermit. I know it will tick you off...but I have to speak my piece. If she had been honest and said..look...I am a member of Freebirds and Kyle was alarmed by some things that went down in Aruba and I want to share them with you because no one can dissect the truth like the Monkeys can...so I want to share his concerns with you. He can't due to confidentiality agreements but I feel the info is worth breaking my confidentiality agreement  so here it is...then she would have my utmost respect. But that is not the way she chose to do it. Instread she took Kyle's concerns and turned them into some "conspiracy" that she "alone uncovered" and in the process...bastardized everything the members of the Persistence did.  I scream out and use my explanation points not out of some love for Kyle, but out of my own sense of right and wrong. I am sorry if you don't understand that.
Kyle owes you all nothing, he owes me nothing!! I didn't know the man when this all started but I have his email just the same as you all do and I respected him enough to send him a note and he respected me enough to answer. That is all!! Jeeze...can you all imagine what would have happened if you had given him the same consideration?

Confidentialty agreement?With whom?

Two...Kyle had a confidentiality agreement with the ship he was on...the Persitence...which is standard, and one with the Freebirds which Kermit agreed to when she joined. Is his career affected by what Kermit did? Absolutely!!! Did he try and cover up the finding of Natalee? No!! And just like Beth and Dave and Jug walked away from Aruba feeling as though "something went wrong" so did Kyle. And it was because of that feeling he joined the Freebirds and openly discussed with other members his concerns.

So you are a Freebird?I was asking what confidentiality agreement you were breaking?Are we not talking about Kyle's own concern's regarding the Persistence from his own mouth??

LDSTLOU.Didn't know if you caught this???


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #787 12/24/08 -
Post by: truthseeker2 on December 29, 2008, 11:40:42 PM

How does one get onto that Freebird site?  I sure would like to discuss this case without having to worry about saying anything that will have people fill up two pages of the same quotes over and over and over again.

I'm sure you will be getting an email soon.  If not I guess you are stuck here with us people who have no principals and are nuts.

I stand with the nuts.

Well, that just proved my point.  Either you agree with the Kyle-bashing...or you might as well not post here anymore.  Sad,  Really sad.



EXCUSE ME?  Nobody is bashing Kyle we are only seeking an explanation of what appears to be some pretty damning words out of HIS mouth. 

Nobody is saying you have to agree with ANYONE.  OTHERS are trying to tell us what we can discuss and research here and they have no right to.  Nothing is beyond discussion.  NOTHING.

Right.  So...will I be banned next?

I come here every single day...and yes, people are bashing Kyle.  You can call it what you want, but if you were the target of some of the posts that have been put out here you would not come back here either.  And you are losing posters over this.  If that's okay with you, then I guess it's okay with you.

LOL.  This is the most response I have ever had to a post on this forum.  I have opinions too, ya know.  And no....they have not been appreciated or respected on this forum.  So, I read.  And what has been going on here for the last few months has been very sad.

I, too, have been at this from the very beginning.  I am not a newcomer. 

There is a level of hostility that has creeped into this discussion that has not been helpful in any way.  Very sad.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #787 12/24/08 -
Post by: Red on December 29, 2008, 11:40:47 PM

What is wrong with you people? I am so sorry, I had to jump in.
How self righteous can you get? That is ridiculous. How dare you slander someone you don't even know.
OMG! Kyle walked away from his trip to Aruba with a funny feeling and expressed his feelings to people who love Natalee just the same as you all do...in the Freebirds Forum where it could be openly discussed amongst others with the same principals...those dedicated to justice for Natalee...how dare you question his integrity or the integrity of his daughter's name. What happened to you all? I just can't believe it.
Like it or not, I am friends with Jug Twitty. Like it or not, he CAN speak for Beth. Like it or not, I have copied and pasted every slanderous post you have made against Kyle and the crew of the Persistence. Believe it or not, Jug has made contact with Kyle and Kyle with Jug over this BS and I can assure you, Jug thinks this is all BS!!!! Make fun of the exclamation points if you must, I am just so disappointed in what is happening here. So is Jug, so is Kyle who busted his butt to bring Natalee home.
This is wrong what you are doing, so wrong!!! Trust me when I tell you Natalee's family members are aware of what you all have accused Kyle and the crew of the Persistence of, they have Kyle's email address and telephone number, and they have nothing but RESPECT for what that man did in Aruba. This nonsense has got to stop. How can you all be so mean and spitefull to people who put their everything into bringing Natalee home to her family?

How does one get onto that Freebird site?  I sure would like to discuss this case without having to worry about saying anything that will have people fill up two pages of the same quotes over and over and over again.

I have no idea, I was never asked...nor  am I offended by that. I don't know what everyone is talking about either when they speak of the "private forums" that have been created lately. Nor have I talked to Kyle in weeks. I was satisfied with what he told me after I spoke with him. He is what you all once thought he was...a very intelligent young man who threw his heart into Natalee's case just the same as all of us did.
I have real problem with Kermit. I know it will tick you off...but I have to speak my piece. If she had been honest and said..look...I am a member of Freebirds and Kyle was alarmed by some things that went down in Aruba and I want to share them with you because no one can dissect the truth like the Monkeys can...so I want to share his concerns with you. He can't due to confidentiality agreements but I feel the info is worth breaking my confidentiality agreement  so here it is...then she would have my utmost respect. But that is not the way she chose to do it. Instread she took Kyle's concerns and turned them into some "conspiracy" that she "alone uncovered" and in the process...bastardized everything the members of the Persistence did.  I scream out and use my explanation points not out of some love for Kyle, but out of my own sense of right and wrong. I am sorry if you don't understand that.
Kyle owes you all nothing, he owes me nothing!! I didn't know the man when this all started but I have his email just the same as you all do and I respected him enough to send him a note and he respected me enough to answer. That is all!! Jeeze...can you all imagine what would have happened if you had given him the same consideration?

Confidentialty agreement?With whom?

Two...Kyle had a confidentiality agreement with the ship he was on...the Persitence...which is standard, and one with the Freebirds which Kermit agreed to when she joined. Is his career affected by what Kermit did? Absolutely!!! Did he try and cover up the finding of Natalee? No!! And just like Beth and Dave and Jug walked away from Aruba feeling as though "something went wrong" so did Kyle. And it was because of that feeling he joined the Freebirds and openly discussed with other members his concerns.

Confidentiality agreement on the internet? Internet confidentiality agreement is by its definition and oxymoron. The mere presence and existence of the internet and world wide web. Seriously. Does anyone think, really think, believe that there is remotely the idea of confidentiality on the internet? I hope not.

Every news outlet has their stories linked to and referenced on the internet. This very site is a corporation and yet has its data taken and disseminated. As for slander, lol, he better get in line as I think he is way at the end of that line when it comes to covering Natalee. When he gets his own hate site, maybe he can discuss slander.

The point being ... if anyone thinks a private site is private ... I have a bridge to sell ya. There is not a private site that has ever existed that we did not know what was being said.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #787 12/24/08 -
Post by: San on December 29, 2008, 11:40:54 PM

How does one get onto that Freebird site?  I sure would like to discuss this case without having to worry about saying anything that will have people fill up two pages of the same quotes over and over and over again.

I'm sure you will be getting an email soon.  If not I guess you are stuck here with us people who have no principals and are nuts.

I stand with the nuts.

Well, that just proved my point.  Either you agree with the Kyle-bashing...or you might as well not post here anymore.  Sad,  Really sad.


I didn't prove any point.  Your post was unwarranted.  I have not bashed Kyle.  The only two people who I see bashing is Hotshot and ldstlou.

You're kidding, right?   People have trashed someone who posted here for weeks now, and MY post is unwarranted?  Please.

No I'm not kidding.  You made the post that was unwarranted.  Your words were uncalled for.  How many times has there been stuff posted over and over.  How many times have we said if you disagree then just skip the posts.  But no you made the smartass comment not me.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #787 12/24/08 -
Post by: ldstlou on December 29, 2008, 11:40:59 PM

What is wrong with you people? I am so sorry, I had to jump in.
How self righteous can you get? That is ridiculous. How dare you slander someone you don't even know.
OMG! Kyle walked away from his trip to Aruba with a funny feeling and expressed his feelings to people who love Natalee just the same as you all do...in the Freebirds Forum where it could be openly discussed amongst others with the same principals...those dedicated to justice for Natalee...how dare you question his integrity or the integrity of his daughter's name. What happened to you all? I just can't believe it.
Like it or not, I am friends with Jug Twitty. Like it or not, he CAN speak for Beth. Like it or not, I have copied and pasted every slanderous post you have made against Kyle and the crew of the Persistence. Believe it or not, Jug has made contact with Kyle and Kyle with Jug over this BS and I can assure you, Jug thinks this is all BS!!!! Make fun of the exclamation points if you must, I am just so disappointed in what is happening here. So is Jug, so is Kyle who busted his butt to bring Natalee home.
This is wrong what you are doing, so wrong!!! Trust me when I tell you Natalee's family members are aware of what you all have accused Kyle and the crew of the Persistence of, they have Kyle's email address and telephone number, and they have nothing but RESPECT for what that man did in Aruba. This nonsense has got to stop. How can you all be so mean and spitefull to people who put their everything into bringing Natalee home to her family?

How does one get onto that Freebird site?  I sure would like to discuss this case without having to worry about saying anything that will have people fill up two pages of the same quotes over and over and over again.

I have no idea, I was never asked...nor  am I offended by that. I don't know what everyone is talking about either when they speak of the "private forums" that have been created lately. Nor have I talked to Kyle in weeks. I was satisfied with what he told me after I spoke with him. He is what you all once thought he was...a very intelligent young man who threw his heart into Natalee's case just the same as all of us did.
I have real problem with Kermit. I know it will tick you off...but I have to speak my piece. If she had been honest and said..look...I am a member of Freebirds and Kyle was alarmed by some things that went down in Aruba and I want to share them with you because no one can dissect the truth like the Monkeys can...so I want to share his concerns with you. He can't due to confidentiality agreements but I feel the info is worth breaking my confidentiality agreement  so here it is...then she would have my utmost respect. But that is not the way she chose to do it. Instread she took Kyle's concerns and turned them into some "conspiracy" that she "alone uncovered" and in the process...bastardized everything the members of the Persistence did.  I scream out and use my explanation points not out of some love for Kyle, but out of my own sense of right and wrong. I am sorry if you don't understand that.
Kyle owes you all nothing, he owes me nothing!! I didn't know the man when this all started but I have his email just the same as you all do and I respected him enough to send him a note and he respected me enough to answer. That is all!! Jeeze...can you all imagine what would have happened if you had given him the same consideration?

Confidentiality agreement?With whom?

Two...Kyle had a confidentiality agreement with the ship he was on...the Persistence...which is standard, and one with the Freebirds which Kermit agreed to when she joined. Is his career affected by what Kermit did? Absolutely!!! Did he try and cover up the finding of Natalee? No!! And just like Beth and Dave and Jug walked away from Aruba feeling as though "something went wrong" so did Kyle. And it was because of that feeling he joined the Freebirds and openly discussed with other members his concerns.

So you are a Freebird?I was asking what confidentiality agreement you were breaking?Are we not talking about Kyle's own concern's regarding the Persistence from his own mouth??

I knew better than to have even tried. I don't know why I did. I am just walking away. I stated from the get go...I am not a member of any forum other than SM and Blogs for Natalee. I am what I am...nothing more...and no great insider info as Kermit claims. I was just a Monkey who was taken aback at the disrespect shown the members of the Persistence...who despite the criticism...just wanted to find Natalee..IMHO.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #787 12/24/08 -
Post by: texasmom on December 29, 2008, 11:41:10 PM

Thank you Red, Klaas, and San!   ::MonkeyCool::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #787 12/24/08 -
Post by: Tamikosmom on December 29, 2008, 11:41:53 PM

What is wrong with you people? I am so sorry, I had to jump in.
How self righteous can you get? That is ridiculous. How dare you slander someone you don't even know.
 
OMG! Kyle walked away from his trip to Aruba with a funny feeling and expressed his feelings to people who love Natalee just the same as you all do...in the Freebirds Forum where it could be openly discussed amongst others with the same principals...those dedicated to justice for Natalee...how dare you question his integrity or the integrity of his daughter's name. What happened to you all? I just can't believe it.

Like it or not, I am friends with Jug Twitty. Like it or not, he CAN speak for Beth. Like it or not, I have copied and pasted every slanderous post you have made against Kyle and the crew of the Persistence. Believe it or not, Jug has made contact with Kyle and Kyle with Jug over this BS and I can assure you, Jug thinks this is all BS!!!! Make fun of the exclamation points if you must, I am just so disappointed in what is happening here. So is Jug, so is Kyle who busted his butt to bring Natalee home.

This is wrong what you are doing, so wrong!!! Trust me when I tell you Natalee's family members are aware of what you all have accused Kyle and the crew of the Persistence of, they have Kyle's email address and telephone number, and they have nothing but RESPECT for what that man did in Aruba. This nonsense has got to stop. How can you all be so mean and spitefull to people who put their everything into bringing Natalee home to her family?

 ::MonkeyConfused::

Lou ... everything I have posted is based on Kyle Kingman's own words ... Kyle's own words regarding what he observed regarding the happenings encompassing the Persistence undertaking.

Has Jug Twitty read a compilation of Kyle's posts?

Without Kyle's own words ... there would be no foundation to my contention that the Persistence undertaking betrayed justice for Natalee Holloway ... betrayed the opportunity that closure would be afforded the family and ... betrayed those who sacrificially donated to the undertaking.

Lou ... the family deserves to know that Kyle believes that Natalee's remains may have been in that trap/cage ... remains that were retrieved by the enemy without so much as a challenge from John S.

Lou ... I am so saddened that you do not comprehend.  For the most part ... for the past 3 1/2 years you and I have connected on the issues but ... always the heart.

Janet

+++++

KYLE KINGMAN - PRIVATE FORUM

Kyle: John is not a believer in the trap. He took ALE's word as gospel that it wasn't case related, yet never studied the videos or bothered to inquire further. He had plans on doing business with Aruba and in S. America and he didn't want to hurt any feelings by talks hinting at lack of complete trust and friendship.

Kyle: I took the proportions of the body form from the head, to shoulder, to a 90 degree angle which I believed to be the hem line of Natalee's skirt. I then took those proportions and matched them to the photo of Natalee with what she was last seen wearing. The proportions matched within an inch from head, to shoulder, to skirt line. Based on this comparison and with what we believed we saw in the Dec 29th video, Tim Miller contacted the family and told them the 99.9% comment. I told Tim not to do anything until we have forensic results back after the site is processed. Jan 7th we sampled the contents and in my opinion we found the skirt under the sand along with the other items The blue fabric was found right where the skirt is pictured. If it isn't her, it will forever haunt me as a major cosmic WTF.



Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #787 12/24/08 -
Post by: Keepthefaith on December 29, 2008, 11:43:25 PM

How does one get onto that Freebird site?  I sure would like to discuss this case without having to worry about saying anything that will have people fill up two pages of the same quotes over and over and over again.

I'm sure you will be getting an email soon.  If not I guess you are stuck here with us people who have no principals and are nuts.

I stand with the nuts.

Well, that just proved my point.  Either you agree with the Kyle-bashing...or you might as well not post here anymore.  Sad,  Really sad.



EXCUSE ME?  Nobody is bashing Kyle we are only seeking an explanation of what appears to be some pretty damning words out of HIS mouth. 

Nobody is saying you have to agree with ANYONE.  OTHERS are trying to tell us what we can discuss and research here and they have no right to.  Nothing is beyond discussion.  NOTHING.

Right.  So...will I be banned next?

I come here every single day...and yes, people are bashing Kyle.  You can call it what you want, but if you were the target of some of the posts that have been put out here you would not come back here either.  And you are losing posters over this.  If that's okay with you, then I guess it's okay with you.

LOL.  This is the most response I have ever had to a post on this forum.  I have opinions too, ya know.  And no....they have not been appreciated or respected on this forum.  So, I read.  And what has been going on here for the last few months has been very sad.

I, too, have been at this from the very beginning.  I am not a newcomer. 

There is a level of hostility that has creeped into this discussion that has not been helpful in any way.  Very sad.

I tend to disagree.Kyle had his concern's with things that took place on the Persistence.I find it Futile to argue for Kyle until he explain's his own concern's of the happening's aboard the Persistence.If he chooses not to.Oh well.That's his choice!


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #787 12/24/08 -
Post by: ldstlou on December 29, 2008, 11:44:49 PM

What is wrong with you people? I am so sorry, I had to jump in.
How self righteous can you get? That is ridiculous. How dare you slander someone you don't even know.
OMG! Kyle walked away from his trip to Aruba with a funny feeling and expressed his feelings to people who love Natalee just the same as you all do...in the Freebirds Forum where it could be openly discussed amongst others with the same principals...those dedicated to justice for Natalee...how dare you question his integrity or the integrity of his daughter's name. What happened to you all? I just can't believe it.
Like it or not, I am friends with Jug Twitty. Like it or not, he CAN speak for Beth. Like it or not, I have copied and pasted every slanderous post you have made against Kyle and the crew of the Persistence. Believe it or not, Jug has made contact with Kyle and Kyle with Jug over this BS and I can assure you, Jug thinks this is all BS!!!! Make fun of the exclamation points if you must, I am just so disappointed in what is happening here. So is Jug, so is Kyle who busted his butt to bring Natalee home.
This is wrong what you are doing, so wrong!!! Trust me when I tell you Natalee's family members are aware of what you all have accused Kyle and the crew of the Persistence of, they have Kyle's email address and telephone number, and they have nothing but RESPECT for what that man did in Aruba. This nonsense has got to stop. How can you all be so mean and spitefull to people who put their everything into bringing Natalee home to her family?

How does one get onto that Freebird site?  I sure would like to discuss this case without having to worry about saying anything that will have people fill up two pages of the same quotes over and over and over again.

I have no idea, I was never asked...nor  am I offended by that. I don't know what everyone is talking about either when they speak of the "private forums" that have been created lately. Nor have I talked to Kyle in weeks. I was satisfied with what he told me after I spoke with him. He is what you all once thought he was...a very intelligent young man who threw his heart into Natalee's case just the same as all of us did.
I have real problem with Kermit. I know it will tick you off...but I have to speak my piece. If she had been honest and said..look...I am a member of Freebirds and Kyle was alarmed by some things that went down in Aruba and I want to share them with you because no one can dissect the truth like the Monkeys can...so I want to share his concerns with you. He can't due to confidentiality agreements but I feel the info is worth breaking my confidentiality agreement  so here it is...then she would have my utmost respect. But that is not the way she chose to do it. Instread she took Kyle's concerns and turned them into some "conspiracy" that she "alone uncovered" and in the process...bastardized everything the members of the Persistence did.  I scream out and use my explanation points not out of some love for Kyle, but out of my own sense of right and wrong. I am sorry if you don't understand that.
Kyle owes you all nothing, he owes me nothing!! I didn't know the man when this all started but I have his email just the same as you all do and I respected him enough to send him a note and he respected me enough to answer. That is all!! Jeeze...can you all imagine what would have happened if you had given him the same consideration?

Confidentialty agreement?With whom?

Two...Kyle had a confidentiality agreement with the ship he was on...the Persitence...which is standard, and one with the Freebirds which Kermit agreed to when she joined. Is his career affected by what Kermit did? Absolutely!!! Did he try and cover up the finding of Natalee? No!! And just like Beth and Dave and Jug walked away from Aruba feeling as though "something went wrong" so did Kyle. And it was because of that feeling he joined the Freebirds and openly discussed with other members his concerns.

Confidentiality agreement on the internet? Internet confidentiality agreement is by its definition and oxymoron. The mere presence and existence of the internet and world wide web. Seriously. Does anyone think, really think, believe that there is remotely the idea of confidentiality on the internet? I hope not.

Every news outlet has their stories linked to and referenced on the internet. This very site is a corporation and yet has its data taken and disseminated. As for slander, lol, he better get in line as I think he is way at the end of that line when it comes to covering Natalee. When he gets his own hate site, maybe he can discuss slander.

The point being ... if anyone thinks a private site is private ... I have a bridge to sell ya. There is not a private site that has ever existed that we did not know what was being said.

Sorry Red...I did. And I did because that is what Klaas taught me...you don't post private e-mails or IM's...that is what she taught me when I first joined.
And call me stupid, but I still have nothing but the utmost respect and admiration for the Freebirds...and always respected that what they produced required confidentiality. I still respect that.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #787 12/24/08 -
Post by: Tamikosmom on December 29, 2008, 11:45:24 PM
San ... please edit my above post.

retrieved by the enemy  without so much as a challenge from John S.

Thank you.

Janet


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #787 12/24/08 -
Post by: Keepthefaith on December 29, 2008, 11:47:00 PM

What is wrong with you people? I am so sorry, I had to jump in.
How self righteous can you get? That is ridiculous. How dare you slander someone you don't even know.
OMG! Kyle walked away from his trip to Aruba with a funny feeling and expressed his feelings to people who love Natalee just the same as you all do...in the Freebirds Forum where it could be openly discussed amongst others with the same principals...those dedicated to justice for Natalee...how dare you question his integrity or the integrity of his daughter's name. What happened to you all? I just can't believe it.
Like it or not, I am friends with Jug Twitty. Like it or not, he CAN speak for Beth. Like it or not, I have copied and pasted every slanderous post you have made against Kyle and the crew of the Persistence. Believe it or not, Jug has made contact with Kyle and Kyle with Jug over this BS and I can assure you, Jug thinks this is all BS!!!! Make fun of the exclamation points if you must, I am just so disappointed in what is happening here. So is Jug, so is Kyle who busted his butt to bring Natalee home.
This is wrong what you are doing, so wrong!!! Trust me when I tell you Natalee's family members are aware of what you all have accused Kyle and the crew of the Persistence of, they have Kyle's email address and telephone number, and they have nothing but RESPECT for what that man did in Aruba. This nonsense has got to stop. How can you all be so mean and spitefull to people who put their everything into bringing Natalee home to her family?

How does one get onto that Freebird site?  I sure would like to discuss this case without having to worry about saying anything that will have people fill up two pages of the same quotes over and over and over again.

I have no idea, I was never asked...nor  am I offended by that. I don't know what everyone is talking about either when they speak of the "private forums" that have been created lately. Nor have I talked to Kyle in weeks. I was satisfied with what he told me after I spoke with him. He is what you all once thought he was...a very intelligent young man who threw his heart into Natalee's case just the same as all of us did.
I have real problem with Kermit. I know it will tick you off...but I have to speak my piece. If she had been honest and said..look...I am a member of Freebirds and Kyle was alarmed by some things that went down in Aruba and I want to share them with you because no one can dissect the truth like the Monkeys can...so I want to share his concerns with you. He can't due to confidentiality agreements but I feel the info is worth breaking my confidentiality agreement  so here it is...then she would have my utmost respect. But that is not the way she chose to do it. Instread she took Kyle's concerns and turned them into some "conspiracy" that she "alone uncovered" and in the process...bastardized everything the members of the Persistence did.  I scream out and use my explanation points not out of some love for Kyle, but out of my own sense of right and wrong. I am sorry if you don't understand that.
Kyle owes you all nothing, he owes me nothing!! I didn't know the man when this all started but I have his email just the same as you all do and I respected him enough to send him a note and he respected me enough to answer. That is all!! Jeeze...can you all imagine what would have happened if you had given him the same consideration?

Confidentiality agreement?With whom?

Two...Kyle had a confidentiality agreement with the ship he was on...the Persistence...which is standard, and one with the Freebirds which Kermit agreed to when she joined. Is his career affected by what Kermit did? Absolutely!!! Did he try and cover up the finding of Natalee? No!! And just like Beth and Dave and Jug walked away from Aruba feeling as though "something went wrong" so did Kyle. And it was because of that feeling he joined the Freebirds and openly discussed with other members his concerns.

So you are a Freebird?I was asking what confidentiality agreement you were breaking?Are we not talking about Kyle's own concern's regarding the Persistence from his own mouth??

I knew better than to have even tried. I don't know why I did. I am just walking away. I stated from the get go...I am not a member of any forum other than SM and Blogs for Natalee. I am what I am...nothing more...and no great insider info as Kermit claims. I was just a Monkey who was taken aback at the disrespect shown the members of the Persistence...who despite the criticism...just wanted to find Natalee..IMHO.

You said it Ldstlou.You don't have to answer.I was just asking what CONFIDENTIALITY AGREEMENT WILL YOU BREAK???


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #787 12/24/08 -
Post by: truthseeker2 on December 29, 2008, 11:48:04 PM

How does one get onto that Freebird site?  I sure would like to discuss this case without having to worry about saying anything that will have people fill up two pages of the same quotes over and over and over again.

I'm sure you will be getting an email soon.  If not I guess you are stuck here with us people who have no principals and are nuts.

I stand with the nuts.

Well, that just proved my point.  Either you agree with the Kyle-bashing...or you might as well not post here anymore.  Sad,  Really sad.


I didn't prove any point.  Your post was unwarranted.  I have not bashed Kyle.  The only two people who I see bashing is Hotshot and ldstlou.

You're kidding, right?   People have trashed someone who posted here for weeks now, and MY post is unwarranted?  Please.

No I'm not kidding.  You made the post that was unwarranted.  Your words were uncalled for.  How many times has there been stuff posted over and over.  How many times have we said if you disagree then just skip the posts.  But no you made the smartass comment not me.

Like I said.............


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #787 12/24/08 -
Post by: Red on December 29, 2008, 11:48:24 PM
Folks I think some are missing an important point here.

I can respect those that are willing to help search for Natalee. I can respect those that help search for any missing person. However, there is a purpose and a stated goal when going into such a mission.

It is ok to question, in fact, that is what SM is all about. If one never questions, one is only propaganda. I questioned many things about this search from the outset and received some pretty hostile and petty emails back in return questioning my loyalties. If you want to see bashing ... I'll show ya bashing and making ill comments when some have less than a clue.

Some people who got involved in this case and were late to the show really should have listened, read and became more learned before they acted as if they knew everything. Do not ever forget that long before there was an ocean search ... there was one on land.

Do I applaud the Persistence and their efforts, of course I do. Do I also scratch my head and ask why with a known budget and time did they not search more targets than map a larger area and leave things unsearched ... of course I do. When one builds a home, one usually does so in an effort to complete the structure with a roof and 4 walls, not just making a larger home unfinished. That kind of makes no sense.

Do I question the fact that there was an exclusive media deal when promises were made to provide SM with pics and info long before the Persistence ever left port, yup. Do I question why there was a beg for money all the while they knew they were pulling out ... yes I do.

Folks, questioning provides accountability. That is a real important thing in life. Do not ever accept anything hook, line and sinker. Many of you have questioned me in the past or you have questioned Tim. There is nothing wrong with that. If I point forth a premise or something that was done, I would expect people to question and want more than just accept what's stated. That's what makes the internet the internet. It is not for the faint of heart.

Are people perfect ... nope, not by a long shot. However, acting rude to those that have been a apart of this story and searched long before it was ever the en vogue thing to do and without a "Date Line" exclusive is hardly a way to gain favor. If you want attacked, maybe I should share some emails.

Questioning is not attacking. I would say as always be civil ... however, making people accountable to questioning is an important part of life. One better be able to hold up to questions and defend their point of view. Especially if one wants to be on the net.

Great points Red. And I am not calling anyone a hero here...we have all done what we thought was right...for our love of Natalee. But I remember the pics of you and Dave digging through the landfill and getting so sick in the process. I also remember people criticising what you did and the Monkeys going to bat for you. You, as well as Beth and Dave and Jug know what it is like trying to operate in that godforsaken island. Why so hard on the Persistence who busted their azzes to do the same thing we have been trying to do since Natalee went missing? That is all I ask.

And I appreciate that y'all had my back. However, I will say this. Never, never did I ever send emails like the one's I received nor have my motives questioned by someone who searched for NH in the capacity like the Persistance did. Like I said, do I respect what they did, yes. But, what goes around comes around.

Here is a semi cryptic message ... "not all people's motives who search are created equal."



Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #787 12/24/08 -
Post by: ldstlou on December 29, 2008, 11:49:52 PM

How does one get onto that Freebird site?  I sure would like to discuss this case without having to worry about saying anything that will have people fill up two pages of the same quotes over and over and over again.

I'm sure you will be getting an email soon.  If not I guess you are stuck here with us people who have no principals and are nuts.

I stand with the nuts.

Well, that just proved my point.  Either you agree with the Kyle-bashing...or you might as well not post here anymore.  Sad,  Really sad.



EXCUSE ME?  Nobody is bashing Kyle we are only seeking an explanation of what appears to be some pretty damning words out of HIS mouth. 

Nobody is saying you have to agree with ANYONE.  OTHERS are trying to tell us what we can discuss and research here and they have no right to.  Nothing is beyond discussion.  NOTHING.

Right.  So...will I be banned next?

I come here every single day...and yes, people are bashing Kyle.  You can call it what you want, but if you were the target of some of the posts that have been put out here you would not come back here either.  And you are losing posters over this.  If that's okay with you, then I guess it's okay with you.

LOL.  This is the most response I have ever had to a post on this forum.  I have opinions too, ya know.  And no....they have not been appreciated or respected on this forum.  So, I read.  And what has been going on here for the last few months has been very sad.

I, too, have been at this from the very beginning.  I am not a newcomer. 

There is a level of hostility that has creeped into this discussion that has not been helpful in any way.  Very sad.

I tend to disagree.Kyle had his concern's with things that took place on the Persistence.I find it Futile to argue for Kyle until he explain's his own concern's of the happening's aboard the Persistence.If he chooses not to.Oh well.That's his choice!

He did voice his concerns with the Freebirds...and Kermit brought those concerns here to discuss. Discuss them...nothing wrong with that...what is wrong in my mind...is acting like his concerns were some conspiracy as Kermit made them out to be. They were concerns and questions Kyle walked away with...and you can see those concerns and questions in the posts Kermit has copied and pasted here. He discussed them with people who were committed to justice for Natalee. He did so at a great expense to his career. What more do you want from him? As I said...I didn't know him anymore than you all did...just sent him a simple e-mail asking what happened...and he answered...imagine that??


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #787 12/24/08 -
Post by: wreck on December 29, 2008, 11:50:21 PM
The Freebirds have done great research, I'm sure their hearts are all in the right place. But, that doesn't make them infallible.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #787 12/24/08 -
Post by: Red on December 29, 2008, 11:51:48 PM

Confidentiality agreement on the internet? Internet confidentiality agreement is by its definition and oxymoron. The mere presence and existence of the internet and world wide web. Seriously. Does anyone think, really think, believe that there is remotely the idea of confidentiality on the internet? I hope not.

Every news outlet has their stories linked to and referenced on the internet. This very site is a corporation and yet has its data taken and disseminated. As for slander, lol, he better get in line as I think he is way at the end of that line when it comes to covering Natalee. When he gets his own hate site, maybe he can discuss slander.

The point being ... if anyone thinks a private site is private ... I have a bridge to sell ya. There is not a private site that has ever existed that we did not know what was being said.

Sorry Red...I did. And I did because that is what Klaas taught me...you don't post private e-mails or IM's...that is what she taught me when I first joined.
And call me stupid, but I still have nothing but the utmost respect and admiration for the Freebirds...and always respected that what they produced required confidentiality. I still respect that.
[/quote]

I am actually more so referring to a private internet web site, not emails or IM's. You are correct that people should respect those of confidential. Then again ... there is no law that says that, its one character that makes it possible.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #787 12/24/08 -
Post by: Keepthefaith on December 29, 2008, 11:53:24 PM

How does one get onto that Freebird site?  I sure would like to discuss this case without having to worry about saying anything that will have people fill up two pages of the same quotes over and over and over again.

I'm sure you will be getting an email soon.  If not I guess you are stuck here with us people who have no principals and are nuts.

I stand with the nuts.

Well, that just proved my point.  Either you agree with the Kyle-bashing...or you might as well not post here anymore.  Sad,  Really sad.



EXCUSE ME?  Nobody is bashing Kyle we are only seeking an explanation of what appears to be some pretty damning words out of HIS mouth. 

Nobody is saying you have to agree with ANYONE.  OTHERS are trying to tell us what we can discuss and research here and they have no right to.  Nothing is beyond discussion.  NOTHING.

Right.  So...will I be banned next?

I come here every single day...and yes, people are bashing Kyle.  You can call it what you want, but if you were the target of some of the posts that have been put out here you would not come back here either.  And you are losing posters over this.  If that's okay with you, then I guess it's okay with you.

LOL.  This is the most response I have ever had to a post on this forum.  I have opinions too, ya know.  And no....they have not been appreciated or respected on this forum.  So, I read.  And what has been going on here for the last few months has been very sad.

I, too, have been at this from the very beginning.  I am not a newcomer. 

There is a level of hostility that has creeped into this discussion that has not been helpful in any way.  Very sad.

I tend to disagree.Kyle had his concern's with things that took place on the Persistence.I find it Futile to argue for Kyle until he explain's his own concern's of the happening's aboard the Persistence.If he chooses not to.Oh well.That's his choice!

He did voice his concerns with the Freebirds...and Kermit brought those concerns here to discuss. Discuss them...nothing wrong with that...what is wrong in my mind...is acting like his concerns were some conspiracy as Kermit made them out to be. They were concerns and questions Kyle walked away with...and you can see those concerns and questions in the posts Kermit has copied and pasted here. He discussed them with people who were committed to justice for Natalee. He did so at a great expense to his career. What more do you want from him? As I said...I didn't know him anymore than you all did...just sent him a simple e-mail asking what happened...and he answered...imagine that??

I speak only for me.TRUTH AND JUSTICE don't require confidentiality agreements!From what Kyle has said i see that there were some very comprimising things that occured on the Persistence.If your OK with that.That's fine.I'm not!


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #787 12/24/08 -
Post by: klaasend on December 29, 2008, 11:54:16 PM

How does one get onto that Freebird site?  I sure would like to discuss this case without having to worry about saying anything that will have people fill up two pages of the same quotes over and over and over again.

I'm sure you will be getting an email soon.  If not I guess you are stuck here with us people who have no principals and are nuts.

I stand with the nuts.

Well, that just proved my point.  Either you agree with the Kyle-bashing...or you might as well not post here anymore.  Sad,  Really sad.



EXCUSE ME?  Nobody is bashing Kyle we are only seeking an explanation of what appears to be some pretty damning words out of HIS mouth. 

Nobody is saying you have to agree with ANYONE.  OTHERS are trying to tell us what we can discuss and research here and they have no right to.  Nothing is beyond discussion.  NOTHING.

Right.  So...will I be banned next?

I come here every single day...and yes, people are bashing Kyle.  You can call it what you want, but if you were the target of some of the posts that have been put out here you would not come back here either.  And you are losing posters over this.  If that's okay with you, then I guess it's okay with you.

LOL.  This is the most response I have ever had to a post on this forum.  I have opinions too, ya know.  And no....they have not been appreciated or respected on this forum.  So, I read.  And what has been going on here for the last few months has been very sad.

I, too, have been at this from the very beginning.  I am not a newcomer. 

There is a level of hostility that has creeped into this discussion that has not been helpful in any way.  Very sad.

I agree there is a level of hostility over the subject and it's sad that people can't agree to disagree.  If some have chosen to leave and post in other forums because of it so be it.  This case has gone on for so long now most established forums have closed their dedicated NH forums and only open when there's something in the news.  Sure, people get mad and open up little private invite only forums all the time.  Members come and go, nothing can be done about that and there is no way we are going to please everyone all the time. 

In case you hadn't noticed, this is not BFN or BNH or Natalee's Freebirds, this is Scared Monkeys.  This site is not about just the Natalee Holloway case.  We want justice for Natalee just like we want justice for Caylee, Stacy, Donna Jou, Jaliek, etc and all the other missing persons.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #787 12/24/08 -
Post by: ldstlou on December 29, 2008, 11:56:39 PM
Folks I think some are missing an important point here.

I can respect those that are willing to help search for Natalee. I can respect those that help search for any missing person. However, there is a purpose and a stated goal when going into such a mission.

It is ok to question, in fact, that is what SM is all about. If one never questions, one is only propaganda. I questioned many things about this search from the outset and received some pretty hostile and petty emails back in return questioning my loyalties. If you want to see bashing ... I'll show ya bashing and making ill comments when some have less than a clue.

Some people who got involved in this case and were late to the show really should have listened, read and became more learned before they acted as if they knew everything. Do not ever forget that long before there was an ocean search ... there was one on land.

Do I applaud the Persistence and their efforts, of course I do. Do I also scratch my head and ask why with a known budget and time did they not search more targets than map a larger area and leave things unsearched ... of course I do. When one builds a home, one usually does so in an effort to complete the structure with a roof and 4 walls, not just making a larger home unfinished. That kind of makes no sense.

Do I question the fact that there was an exclusive media deal when promises were made to provide SM with pics and info long before the Persistence ever left port, yup. Do I question why there was a beg for money all the while they knew they were pulling out ... yes I do.

Folks, questioning provides accountability. That is a real important thing in life. Do not ever accept anything hook, line and sinker. Many of you have questioned me in the past or you have questioned Tim. There is nothing wrong with that. If I point forth a premise or something that was done, I would expect people to question and want more than just accept what's stated. That's what makes the internet the internet. It is not for the faint of heart.

Are people perfect ... nope, not by a long shot. However, acting rude to those that have been a apart of this story and searched long before it was ever the en vogue thing to do and without a "Date Line" exclusive is hardly a way to gain favor. If you want attacked, maybe I should share some emails.

Questioning is not attacking. I would say as always be civil ... however, making people accountable to questioning is an important part of life. One better be able to hold up to questions and defend their point of view. Especially if one wants to be on the net.

Great points Red. And I am not calling anyone a hero here...we have all done what we thought was right...for our love of Natalee. But I remember the pics of you and Dave digging through the landfill and getting so sick in the process. I also remember people criticising what you did and the Monkeys going to bat for you. You, as well as Beth and Dave and Jug know what it is like trying to operate in that godforsaken island. Why so hard on the Persistence who busted their azzes to do the same thing we have been trying to do since Natalee went missing? That is all I ask.

And I appreciate that y'all had my back. However, I will say this. Never, never did I ever send emails like the one's I received nor have my motives questioned by someone who searched for NH in the capacity like the Persistance did. Like I said, do I respect what they did, yes. But, what goes around comes around.

Here is a semi cryptic message ... "not all people's motives who search are created equal."



Red,
I think if you called Kyle, he would be the first to tell you he made mistakes. he did when I called him. But he is young and his heart was in the right place and he learned a lot of lessons the hard way and yet is still willing to face Natalee's family with his failures. His failures were not a conspiracy with John Silvetti to hide Natalee's body for rights for oil...they were they same failures that Greta had when she was "inclined to believe joran". Do you know what I am saying? The insanity of what goes on in Aruba is so crazy...that they walked away like everyone there saying...WTF? But I do in my heart believe their intentions and actions were pure.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #787 12/24/08 -
Post by: klaasend on December 29, 2008, 11:58:51 PM
The Freebirds have done great research, I'm sure their hearts are all in the right place. But, that doesn't make them infallible.

Wreck - I agree, I have alot of respect for the Freebird's


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #787 12/24/08 -
Post by: San on December 29, 2008, 11:59:03 PM
The Freebirds have done great research, I'm sure their hearts are all in the right place. But, that doesn't make them infallible.

I agree they did great work.  Where did Freebirds get all their information.  They got it from people asking questions and finding out information on message boards that shared the information with everyone.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #787 12/24/08 -
Post by: Red on December 30, 2008, 12:00:45 AM
My main point is respectful disagreement or debate. I agree with Wreck, the Freebirds have done some nice work. We have posted some of their material here and on FP of SM.

Looking at an issue from different perspectives. OK, even bigger point and this is what Scared Monkeys blog was founded on. Write and discuss what one is passionate about and if you cannot defend your point of view without cursing or calling calling some one a name ... don't write it.

One must always know that when they put themselves out there they open themselves up to public ridicule and scorn. It comes with the territory. Always be able to defend what you believe and do so with a smile.  ::MonkeyCool::





Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #787 12/24/08 -
Post by: ldstlou on December 30, 2008, 12:01:56 AM

How does one get onto that Freebird site?  I sure would like to discuss this case without having to worry about saying anything that will have people fill up two pages of the same quotes over and over and over again.

I'm sure you will be getting an email soon.  If not I guess you are stuck here with us people who have no principals and are nuts.

I stand with the nuts.

Well, that just proved my point.  Either you agree with the Kyle-bashing...or you might as well not post here anymore.  Sad,  Really sad.



EXCUSE ME?  Nobody is bashing Kyle we are only seeking an explanation of what appears to be some pretty damning words out of HIS mouth. 

Nobody is saying you have to agree with ANYONE.  OTHERS are trying to tell us what we can discuss and research here and they have no right to.  Nothing is beyond discussion.  NOTHING.

Right.  So...will I be banned next?

I come here every single day...and yes, people are bashing Kyle.  You can call it what you want, but if you were the target of some of the posts that have been put out here you would not come back here either.  And you are losing posters over this.  If that's okay with you, then I guess it's okay with you.

LOL.  This is the most response I have ever had to a post on this forum.  I have opinions too, ya know.  And no....they have not been appreciated or respected on this forum.  So, I read.  And what has been going on here for the last few months has been very sad.

I, too, have been at this from the very beginning.  I am not a newcomer. 

There is a level of hostility that has creeped into this discussion that has not been helpful in any way.  Very sad.

I agree there is a level of hostility over the subject and it's sad that people can't agree to disagree.  If some have chosen to leave and post in other forums because of it so be it.  This case has gone on for so long now most established forums have closed their dedicated NH forums and only open when there's something in the news.  Sure, people get mad and open up little private invite only forums all the time.  Members come and go, nothing can be done about that and there is no way we are going to please everyone all the time. 

In case you hadn't noticed, this is not BFN or BNH or Natalee's Freebirds, this is Scared Monkeys.  This site is not about just the Natalee Holloway case.  We want justice for Natalee just like we want justice for Caylee, Stacy, Donna Jou, Jaliek, etc and all the other missing persons.

Klaas...you know me..at least I think you do. I just want you to know that my feelings come only from my own feelings about how Kermit handled the situation. I am not a part of any private forum and don't claim any insider info. You go to BFN the same as I do and I just IM'ed Kyle when all this came out because I was so surprised, He gave me his number and I talked to him the same as anyone else could have and I am telling you, he is a good guy. It is the only reason I stick up for him.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #787 12/24/08 -
Post by: wreck on December 30, 2008, 12:05:21 AM
It appears to me that Kyle started out with great intentions, lapsed into poor judgement and trust, then recently is either remorseful or trying to cover his own behind.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #787 12/24/08 -
Post by: Tamikosmom on December 30, 2008, 12:06:03 AM
How was Kermit ... who has staunchly upheld Natalee Holloway's family for 3 1/2 years ... to know when he went along with a "confidentiality agreement" on a private forum that Kyle Kingman's was about to reveal that the Persistence undertaking was nothing but a hoax to further the Aruban coverup ... a hoax that would insure that the family would never receive closure ... would never bring home their beloved home to rest on American soil.

A confidentiality agreement could not be honored under the circumstance.  The Persistence hoax needed to to exposed.

After being assured that Beth Holloway and the FBI were aware of the ROV images ... Kermit went out on a limb and took a personal risk on behalf of justice for Natalee Holloway and ... closure for her family and ... shared the truth on an open forum ... the SM Natalee Holloway Forum.

Maybe the finger pointing should be directed at Kyle Kingman ... not the messenger.

The ROV images that escaped ALE destruction and ... Kyles observations regarding the the Persistence hoax should have been immediately shared with the family and FBI upon setting foot on American soil rather than ... posting on a private and/or open forum.  Also there should have been no attempt to make a deal with major networks.

Janet


 


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #787 12/24/08 -
Post by: ldstlou on December 30, 2008, 12:06:23 AM

What is wrong with you people? I am so sorry, I had to jump in.
How self righteous can you get? That is ridiculous. How dare you slander someone you don't even know.
OMG! Kyle walked away from his trip to Aruba with a funny feeling and expressed his feelings to people who love Natalee just the same as you all do...in the Freebirds Forum where it could be openly discussed amongst others with the same principals...those dedicated to justice for Natalee...how dare you question his integrity or the integrity of his daughter's name. What happened to you all? I just can't believe it.
Like it or not, I am friends with Jug Twitty. Like it or not, he CAN speak for Beth. Like it or not, I have copied and pasted every slanderous post you have made against Kyle and the crew of the Persistence. Believe it or not, Jug has made contact with Kyle and Kyle with Jug over this BS and I can assure you, Jug thinks this is all BS!!!! Make fun of the exclamation points if you must, I am just so disappointed in what is happening here. So is Jug, so is Kyle who busted his butt to bring Natalee home.
This is wrong what you are doing, so wrong!!! Trust me when I tell you Natalee's family members are aware of what you all have accused Kyle and the crew of the Persistence of, they have Kyle's email address and telephone number, and they have nothing but RESPECT for what that man did in Aruba. This nonsense has got to stop. How can you all be so mean and spitefull to people who put their everything into bringing Natalee home to her family?

How does one get onto that Freebird site?  I sure would like to discuss this case without having to worry about saying anything that will have people fill up two pages of the same quotes over and over and over again.

I have no idea, I was never asked...nor  am I offended by that. I don't know what everyone is talking about either when they speak of the "private forums" that have been created lately. Nor have I talked to Kyle in weeks. I was satisfied with what he told me after I spoke with him. He is what you all once thought he was...a very intelligent young man who threw his heart into Natalee's case just the same as all of us did.
I have real problem with Kermit. I know it will tick you off...but I have to speak my piece. If she had been honest and said..look...I am a member of Freebirds and Kyle was alarmed by some things that went down in Aruba and I want to share them with you because no one can dissect the truth like the Monkeys can...so I want to share his concerns with you. He can't due to confidentiality agreements but I feel the info is worth breaking my confidentiality agreement  so here it is...then she would have my utmost respect. But that is not the way she chose to do it. Instread she took Kyle's concerns and turned them into some "conspiracy" that she "alone uncovered" and in the process...bastardized everything the members of the Persistence did.  I scream out and use my explanation points not out of some love for Kyle, but out of my own sense of right and wrong. I am sorry if you don't understand that.
Kyle owes you all nothing, he owes me nothing!! I didn't know the man when this all started but I have his email just the same as you all do and I respected him enough to send him a note and he respected me enough to answer. That is all!! Jeeze...can you all imagine what would have happened if you had given him the same consideration?

Confidentiality agreement?With whom?

Two...Kyle had a confidentiality agreement with the ship he was on...the Persistence...which is standard, and one with the Freebirds which Kermit agreed to when she joined. Is his career affected by what Kermit did? Absolutely!!! Did he try and cover up the finding of Natalee? No!! And just like Beth and Dave and Jug walked away from Aruba feeling as though "something went wrong" so did Kyle. And it was because of that feeling he joined the Freebirds and openly discussed with other members his concerns.

So you are a Freebird?I was asking what confidentiality agreement you were breaking?Are we not talking about Kyle's own concern's regarding the Persistence from his own mouth??

I knew better than to have even tried. I don't know why I did. I am just walking away. I stated from the get go...I am not a member of any forum other than SM and Blogs for Natalee. I am what I am...nothing more...and no great insider info as Kermit claims. I was just a Monkey who was taken aback at the disrespect shown the members of the Persistence...who despite the criticism...just wanted to find Natalee..IMHO.

You said it Ldstlou.You don't have to answer.I was just asking what CONFIDENTIALITY AGREEMENT WILL YOU BREAK???

You know what? I have no idea what that is supposed to mean. I have been a Monkey for a long time and hate this is happening. If you are insinuating anything more than that then you are wrong. I miss coming here and talking about Natalee. But what has happened in regards to Kyle really bothers me and I have to stick by my beliefs just the same as you do. Don't make it anymore or any less than that please. I am not an enemy. My intentions are the same as yours.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #787 12/24/08 -
Post by: truthseeker2 on December 30, 2008, 12:07:21 AM
Right.  So...will I be banned next?

I come here every single day...and yes, people are bashing Kyle.  You can call it what you want, but if you were the target of some of the posts that have been put out here you would not come back here either.  And you are losing posters over this.  If that's okay with you, then I guess it's okay with you.

LOL.  This is the most response I have ever had to a post on this forum.  I have opinions too, ya know.  And no....they have not been appreciated or respected on this forum.  So, I read.  And what has been going on here for the last few months has been very sad.

I, too, have been at this from the very beginning.  I am not a newcomer. 

There is a level of hostility that has creeped into this discussion that has not been helpful in any way.  Very sad.

I agree there is a level of hostility over the subject and it's sad that people can't agree to disagree.  If some have chosen to leave and post in other forums because of it so be it.  This case has gone on for so long now most established forums have closed their dedicated NH forums and only open when there's something in the news.  Sure, people get mad and open up little private invite only forums all the time.  Members come and go, nothing can be done about that and there is no way we are going to please everyone all the time. 

In case you hadn't noticed, this is not BFN or BNH or Natalee's Freebirds, this is Scared Monkeys.  This site is not about just the Natalee Holloway case.  We want justice for Natalee just like we want justice for Caylee, Stacy, Donna Jou, Jaliek, etc and all the other missing persons.

Klaas,

I have the utmost respect for you and have never caused a problem on this firum.  But, San's comment to me is what was uncalled for.  I was not even posting her to begin with.  This is the level of hostility that has gone way beyond what this section of the forum was intended to produce.  IMO, Natalee and her family deserve better.

And, yes, I have noticed that this is not BFN or BNH.  This was always the preferred place to be, but not anymore.  You must have noticed the drop off in activity here.  And with all that is going on in the Netherlands and the show on E! tonight, and this is still what is being discussed? 

I have read many disturbing posts among longtime monkeys.  This isn't right.  While I have never been one to dominate the discussion here, I did notice that monkeys were always able to get through the differences.  This one has gone too far.

Personally, if I can find a good place to discuss this case I will go.  I would rather stay here, but the discussion is very one sided these days.

So to make some monkeys happy....I'll just read from now on, until I can find a better place....if that's okay with you and Red.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #787 12/24/08 -
Post by: ldstlou on December 30, 2008, 12:09:05 AM

What is wrong with you people? I am so sorry, I had to jump in.
How self righteous can you get? That is ridiculous. How dare you slander someone you don't even know.
OMG! Kyle walked away from his trip to Aruba with a funny feeling and expressed his feelings to people who love Natalee just the same as you all do...in the Freebirds Forum where it could be openly discussed amongst others with the same principals...those dedicated to justice for Natalee...how dare you question his integrity or the integrity of his daughter's name. What happened to you all? I just can't believe it.
Like it or not, I am friends with Jug Twitty. Like it or not, he CAN speak for Beth. Like it or not, I have copied and pasted every slanderous post you have made against Kyle and the crew of the Persistence. Believe it or not, Jug has made contact with Kyle and Kyle with Jug over this BS and I can assure you, Jug thinks this is all BS!!!! Make fun of the exclamation points if you must, I am just so disappointed in what is happening here. So is Jug, so is Kyle who busted his butt to bring Natalee home.
This is wrong what you are doing, so wrong!!! Trust me when I tell you Natalee's family members are aware of what you all have accused Kyle and the crew of the Persistence of, they have Kyle's email address and telephone number, and they have nothing but RESPECT for what that man did in Aruba. This nonsense has got to stop. How can you all be so mean and spitefull to people who put their everything into bringing Natalee home to her family?

How does one get onto that Freebird site?  I sure would like to discuss this case without having to worry about saying anything that will have people fill up two pages of the same quotes over and over and over again.

I have no idea, I was never asked...nor  am I offended by that. I don't know what everyone is talking about either when they speak of the "private forums" that have been created lately. Nor have I talked to Kyle in weeks. I was satisfied with what he told me after I spoke with him. He is what you all once thought he was...a very intelligent young man who threw his heart into Natalee's case just the same as all of us did.
I have real problem with Kermit. I know it will tick you off...but I have to speak my piece. If she had been honest and said..look...I am a member of Freebirds and Kyle was alarmed by some things that went down in Aruba and I want to share them with you because no one can dissect the truth like the Monkeys can...so I want to share his concerns with you. He can't due to confidentiality agreements but I feel the info is worth breaking my confidentiality agreement  so here it is...then she would have my utmost respect. But that is not the way she chose to do it. Instread she took Kyle's concerns and turned them into some "conspiracy" that she "alone uncovered" and in the process...bastardized everything the members of the Persistence did.  I scream out and use my explanation points not out of some love for Kyle, but out of my own sense of right and wrong. I am sorry if you don't understand that.
Kyle owes you all nothing, he owes me nothing!! I didn't know the man when this all started but I have his email just the same as you all do and I respected him enough to send him a note and he respected me enough to answer. That is all!! Jeeze...can you all imagine what would have happened if you had given him the same consideration?

Confidentiality agreement?With whom?

Two...Kyle had a confidentiality agreement with the ship he was on...the Persistence...which is standard, and one with the Freebirds which Kermit agreed to when she joined. Is his career affected by what Kermit did? Absolutely!!! Did he try and cover up the finding of Natalee? No!! And just like Beth and Dave and Jug walked away from Aruba feeling as though "something went wrong" so did Kyle. And it was because of that feeling he joined the Freebirds and openly discussed with other members his concerns.

So you are a Freebird?I was asking what confidentiality agreement you were breaking?Are we not talking about Kyle's own concern's regarding the Persistence from his own mouth??

I knew better than to have even tried. I don't know why I did. I am just walking away. I stated from the get go...I am not a member of any forum other than SM and Blogs for Natalee. I am what I am...nothing more...and no great insider info as Kermit claims. I was just a Monkey who was taken aback at the disrespect shown the members of the Persistence...who despite the criticism...just wanted to find Natalee..IMHO.

You said it Ldstlou.You don't have to answer.I was just asking what CONFIDENTIALITY AGREEMENT WILL YOU BREAK???

You know what? I have no idea what that is supposed to mean. I have been a Monkey for a long time and hate this is happening. If you are insinuating anything more than that then you are wrong. I miss coming here and talking about Natalee. But what has happened in regards to Kyle really bothers me and I have to stick by my beliefs just the same as you do. Don't make it anymore or any less than that please. I am not an enemy. My intentions are the same as yours.

I may have misread what you were saying...I am so sorry if I did Sweetie...this is just so hard...for all of us.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #787 12/24/08 -
Post by: klaasend on December 30, 2008, 12:12:55 AM
ldstlou - I know you are only trying to stand up and protect Kyle and the crew of the Persistence against those who may have questions regarding some of the things Kyle has said, etc.

You are standing up for what you believe in and that is to be commended, however, what if you are wrong?  I'm not saying it's so but what if you and Natalee's are being lied to?

When things don't seem right, we take a closer look.   Is that so wrong?

Hypothetical:

One of Joran's friends is posting in a private invite only forum where the members sign a confidentiality agreement not to copy and paste info posted in the forum on the outside.  This friend tells of information that would solve the case and put Joran in jail for the rest of his life.
  Do you tell others about this or do you honor the confidentiality agreement?


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #787 12/24/08 -
Post by: Keepthefaith on December 30, 2008, 12:14:40 AM

What is wrong with you people? I am so sorry, I had to jump in.
How self righteous can you get? That is ridiculous. How dare you slander someone you don't even know.
OMG! Kyle walked away from his trip to Aruba with a funny feeling and expressed his feelings to people who love Natalee just the same as you all do...in the Freebirds Forum where it could be openly discussed amongst others with the same principals...those dedicated to justice for Natalee...how dare you question his integrity or the integrity of his daughter's name. What happened to you all? I just can't believe it.
Like it or not, I am friends with Jug Twitty. Like it or not, he CAN speak for Beth. Like it or not, I have copied and pasted every slanderous post you have made against Kyle and the crew of the Persistence. Believe it or not, Jug has made contact with Kyle and Kyle with Jug over this BS and I can assure you, Jug thinks this is all BS!!!! Make fun of the exclamation points if you must, I am just so disappointed in what is happening here. So is Jug, so is Kyle who busted his butt to bring Natalee home.
This is wrong what you are doing, so wrong!!! Trust me when I tell you Natalee's family members are aware of what you all have accused Kyle and the crew of the Persistence of, they have Kyle's email address and telephone number, and they have nothing but RESPECT for what that man did in Aruba. This nonsense has got to stop. How can you all be so mean and spitefull to people who put their everything into bringing Natalee home to her family?

How does one get onto that Freebird site?  I sure would like to discuss this case without having to worry about saying anything that will have people fill up two pages of the same quotes over and over and over again.

I have no idea, I was never asked...nor  am I offended by that. I don't know what everyone is talking about either when they speak of the "private forums" that have been created lately. Nor have I talked to Kyle in weeks. I was satisfied with what he told me after I spoke with him. He is what you all once thought he was...a very intelligent young man who threw his heart into Natalee's case just the same as all of us did.
I have real problem with Kermit. I know it will tick you off...but I have to speak my piece. If she had been honest and said..look...I am a member of Freebirds and Kyle was alarmed by some things that went down in Aruba and I want to share them with you because no one can dissect the truth like the Monkeys can...so I want to share his concerns with you. He can't due to confidentiality agreements but I feel the info is worth breaking my confidentiality agreement  so here it is...then she would have my utmost respect. But that is not the way she chose to do it. Instread she took Kyle's concerns and turned them into some "conspiracy" that she "alone uncovered" and in the process...bastardized everything the members of the Persistence did.  I scream out and use my explanation points not out of some love for Kyle, but out of my own sense of right and wrong. I am sorry if you don't understand that.
Kyle owes you all nothing, he owes me nothing!! I didn't know the man when this all started but I have his email just the same as you all do and I respected him enough to send him a note and he respected me enough to answer. That is all!! Jeeze...can you all imagine what would have happened if you had given him the same consideration?

Confidentiality agreement?With whom?

Two...Kyle had a confidentiality agreement with the ship he was on...the Persistence...which is standard, and one with the Freebirds which Kermit agreed to when she joined. Is his career affected by what Kermit did? Absolutely!!! Did he try and cover up the finding of Natalee? No!! And just like Beth and Dave and Jug walked away from Aruba feeling as though "something went wrong" so did Kyle. And it was because of that feeling he joined the Freebirds and openly discussed with other members his concerns.

So you are a Freebird?I was asking what confidentiality agreement you were breaking?Are we not talking about Kyle's own concern's regarding the Persistence from his own mouth??

I knew better than to have even tried. I don't know why I did. I am just walking away. I stated from the get go...I am not a member of any forum other than SM and Blogs for Natalee. I am what I am...nothing more...and no great insider info as Kermit claims. I was just a Monkey who was taken aback at the disrespect shown the members of the Persistence...who despite the criticism...just wanted to find Natalee..IMHO.

You said it Ldstlou.You don't have to answer.I was just asking what CONFIDENTIALITY AGREEMENT WILL YOU BREAK???

You know what? I have no idea what that is supposed to mean. I have been a Monkey for a long time and hate this is happening. If you are insinuating anything more than that then you are wrong. I miss coming here and talking about Natalee. But what has happened in regards to Kyle really bothers me and I have to stick by my beliefs just the same as you do. Don't make it anymore or any less than that please. I am not an enemy. My intentions are the same as yours.

I don't think your an enemy whatsoever ldstlou.I have major concerns that with all the knowledge from how this case has been handle from the beginning that the Persistence did not go down more informed,and or had some type of protocol,of what to do upon finding anything that remotely was human remains.Kyle's words are what the are.Alarming!To me anyway.I agree to disagree adn that's OK.To whom does Kyle have a Confidentiality agreement?"IF" it is with Schaeffer,Silvetti,and or a Major TV Network that will close the deal for me in terms of character as well as motivation!"IF" there is a deal what are the percentages?


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #787 12/24/08 -
Post by: San on December 30, 2008, 12:23:46 AM
Right.  So...will I be banned next?

I come here every single day...and yes, people are bashing Kyle.  You can call it what you want, but if you were the target of some of the posts that have been put out here you would not come back here either.  And you are losing posters over this.  If that's okay with you, then I guess it's okay with you.

LOL.  This is the most response I have ever had to a post on this forum.  I have opinions too, ya know.  And no....they have not been appreciated or respected on this forum.  So, I read.  And what has been going on here for the last few months has been very sad.

I, too, have been at this from the very beginning.  I am not a newcomer. 

There is a level of hostility that has creeped into this discussion that has not been helpful in any way.  Very sad.

I agree there is a level of hostility over the subject and it's sad that people can't agree to disagree.  If some have chosen to leave and post in other forums because of it so be it.  This case has gone on for so long now most established forums have closed their dedicated NH forums and only open when there's something in the news.  Sure, people get mad and open up little private invite only forums all the time.  Members come and go, nothing can be done about that and there is no way we are going to please everyone all the time. 

In case you hadn't noticed, this is not BFN or BNH or Natalee's Freebirds, this is Scared Monkeys.  This site is not about just the Natalee Holloway case.  We want justice for Natalee just like we want justice for Caylee, Stacy, Donna Jou, Jaliek, etc and all the other missing persons.

Klaas,

I have the utmost respect for you and have never caused a problem on this firum.  But, San's comment to me is what was uncalled for.  I was not even posting her to begin with.  This is the level of hostility that has gone way beyond what this section of the forum was intended to produce.  IMO, Natalee and her family deserve better.

And, yes, I have noticed that this is not BFN or BNH.  This was always the preferred place to be, but not anymore.  You must have noticed the drop off in activity here.  And with all that is going on in the Netherlands and the show on E! tonight, and this is still what is being discussed? 

I have read many disturbing posts among longtime monkeys.  This isn't right.  While I have never been one to dominate the discussion here, I did notice that monkeys were always able to get through the differences.  This one has gone too far.

Personally, if I can find a good place to discuss this case I will go.  I would rather stay here, but the discussion is very one sided these days.

So to make some monkeys happy....I'll just read from now on, until I can find a better place....if that's okay with you and Red.

Have I ever been hostile to you before.  No I haven't.  But to ask for a link to another forum while you are posting here because you disagreed with what is being said is insulting.  You threw a jab at SM.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #787 12/24/08 -
Post by: truthseeker2 on December 30, 2008, 12:29:14 AM
Right.  So...will I be banned next?

I come here every single day...and yes, people are bashing Kyle.  You can call it what you want, but if you were the target of some of the posts that have been put out here you would not come back here either.  And you are losing posters over this.  If that's okay with you, then I guess it's okay with you.

LOL.  This is the most response I have ever had to a post on this forum.  I have opinions too, ya know.  And no....they have not been appreciated or respected on this forum.  So, I read.  And what has been going on here for the last few months has been very sad.

I, too, have been at this from the very beginning.  I am not a newcomer. 

There is a level of hostility that has creeped into this discussion that has not been helpful in any way.  Very sad.

I agree there is a level of hostility over the subject and it's sad that people can't agree to disagree.  If some have chosen to leave and post in other forums because of it so be it.  This case has gone on for so long now most established forums have closed their dedicated NH forums and only open when there's something in the news.  Sure, people get mad and open up little private invite only forums all the time.  Members come and go, nothing can be done about that and there is no way we are going to please everyone all the time. 

In case you hadn't noticed, this is not BFN or BNH or Natalee's Freebirds, this is Scared Monkeys.  This site is not about just the Natalee Holloway case.  We want justice for Natalee just like we want justice for Caylee, Stacy, Donna Jou, Jaliek, etc and all the other missing persons.

Klaas,

I have the utmost respect for you and have never caused a problem on this firum.  But, San's comment to me is what was uncalled for.  I was not even posting her to begin with.  This is the level of hostility that has gone way beyond what this section of the forum was intended to produce.  IMO, Natalee and her family deserve better.

And, yes, I have noticed that this is not BFN or BNH.  This was always the preferred place to be, but not anymore.  You must have noticed the drop off in activity here.  And with all that is going on in the Netherlands and the show on E! tonight, and this is still what is being discussed? 

I have read many disturbing posts among longtime monkeys.  This isn't right.  While I have never been one to dominate the discussion here, I did notice that monkeys were always able to get through the differences.  This one has gone too far.

Personally, if I can find a good place to discuss this case I will go.  I would rather stay here, but the discussion is very one sided these days.

So to make some monkeys happy....I'll just read from now on, until I can find a better place....if that's okay with you and Red.

Have I ever been hostile to you before.  No I haven't.  But to ask for a link to another forum while you are posting here because you disagreed with what is being said is insulting.  You threw a jab at SM.

I wasn't posting to you.  Make of it what you will.  I really do not care anymore. 



Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #787 12/24/08 -
Post by: ldstlou on December 30, 2008, 12:31:22 AM
ldstlou - I know you are only trying to stand up and protect Kyle and the crew of the Persistence against those who may have questions regarding some of the things Kyle has said, etc.

You are standing up for what you believe in and that is to be commended, however, what if you are wrong?  I'm not saying it's so but what if you and Natalee's are being lied to?

When things don't seem right, we take a closer look.   Is that so wrong?

Hypothetical:

One of Joran's friends is posting in a private invite only forum where the members sign a confidentiality agreement not to copy and paste info posted in the forum on the outside.  This friend tells of information that would solve the case and put Joran in jail for the rest of his life.
  Do you tell others about this or do you honor the confidentiality agreement?

I trust people...you know I do Klaas...I believed for a while that Caylee might have been kidnapped. But YOU taught me to put aside emotions and go for the facts..and I did this with Kyle.
Again...what came out...came out. If I were Kermit, I would not have done it the way she did. But regardless...to take Kyles's obvious concerns that he expressed to the Freebirds...who are KNOWN to publish the facts...in my mind, shows he was not part of some conspiracy, but was as dedicated to the truth as we are. I just think it is so wrong, to then take his concerns he expressed to Natalee's family and to the Freebirds and use them against him as Kermit has done...again..imho...is wrong. It's not the info I a so opposed to, it is what she did with the info. Fine, nothing is private...but at least say what happened when portraying the info. Kyle had concerns...and in my mind...expressed them openly with the Freebirds. H wasn't hiding anything...to the contrary...he expressed them to people committed to justice for Natalee. Why make it out as anything other than what happened? That is what I can'twrap my mind around.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #787 12/24/08 -
Post by: San on December 30, 2008, 12:32:04 AM
Right.  So...will I be banned next?

I come here every single day...and yes, people are bashing Kyle.  You can call it what you want, but if you were the target of some of the posts that have been put out here you would not come back here either.  And you are losing posters over this.  If that's okay with you, then I guess it's okay with you.

LOL.  This is the most response I have ever had to a post on this forum.  I have opinions too, ya know.  And no....they have not been appreciated or respected on this forum.  So, I read.  And what has been going on here for the last few months has been very sad.

I, too, have been at this from the very beginning.  I am not a newcomer. 

There is a level of hostility that has creeped into this discussion that has not been helpful in any way.  Very sad.

I agree there is a level of hostility over the subject and it's sad that people can't agree to disagree.  If some have chosen to leave and post in other forums because of it so be it.  This case has gone on for so long now most established forums have closed their dedicated NH forums and only open when there's something in the news.  Sure, people get mad and open up little private invite only forums all the time.  Members come and go, nothing can be done about that and there is no way we are going to please everyone all the time. 

In case you hadn't noticed, this is not BFN or BNH or Natalee's Freebirds, this is Scared Monkeys.  This site is not about just the Natalee Holloway case.  We want justice for Natalee just like we want justice for Caylee, Stacy, Donna Jou, Jaliek, etc and all the other missing persons.

Klaas,

I have the utmost respect for you and have never caused a problem on this firum.  But, San's comment to me is what was uncalled for.  I was not even posting her to begin with.  This is the level of hostility that has gone way beyond what this section of the forum was intended to produce.  IMO, Natalee and her family deserve better.

And, yes, I have noticed that this is not BFN or BNH.  This was always the preferred place to be, but not anymore.  You must have noticed the drop off in activity here.  And with all that is going on in the Netherlands and the show on E! tonight, and this is still what is being discussed? 

I have read many disturbing posts among longtime monkeys.  This isn't right.  While I have never been one to dominate the discussion here, I did notice that monkeys were always able to get through the differences.  This one has gone too far.

Personally, if I can find a good place to discuss this case I will go.  I would rather stay here, but the discussion is very one sided these days.

So to make some monkeys happy....I'll just read from now on, until I can find a better place....if that's okay with you and Red.

Have I ever been hostile to you before.  No I haven't.  But to ask for a link to another forum while you are posting here because you disagreed with what is being said is insulting.  You threw a jab at SM.

I wasn't posting to you.  Make of it what you will.  I really do not care anymore. 


I'm done with it.  We are going to disagree on this and that's fine.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #787 12/24/08 -
Post by: Keepthefaith on December 30, 2008, 12:37:43 AM
Isn't this what happened last time we started to discuss the Persistence???We're back to talking about everything but the Persistence?I'm still interested in who the Power families are on the island,what they own,as well as how they're tied together because they have to be.It's a very small island.You must do business with your enemies as well..JMOO


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #787 12/24/08 -
Post by: KYcat on December 30, 2008, 12:38:44 AM
Quote from: Red on Today at 10:28:32 PM
Folks I think some are missing an important point here.

I can respect those that are willing to help search for Natalee. I can respect those that help search for any missing person. However, there is a purpose and a stated goal when going into such a mission.

It is ok to question, in fact, that is what SM is all about. If one never questions, one is only propaganda. I questioned many things about this search from the outset and received some pretty hostile and petty emails back in return questioning my loyalties. If you want to see bashing ... I'll show ya bashing and making ill comments when some have less than a clue.

Some people who got involved in this case and were late to the show really should have listened, read and became more learned before they acted as if they knew everything. Do not ever forget that long before there was an ocean search ... there was one on land.

Do I applaud the Persistence and their efforts, of course I do. Do I also scratch my head and ask why with a known budget and time did they not search more targets than map a larger area and leave things unsearched ... of course I do. When one builds a home, one usually does so in an effort to complete the structure with a roof and 4 walls, not just making a larger home unfinished. That kind of makes no sense.

Do I question the fact that there was an exclusive media deal when promises were made to provide SM with pics and info long before the Persistence ever left port, yup. Do I question why there was a beg for money all the while they knew they were pulling out ... yes I do.

Folks, questioning provides accountability. That is a real important thing in life. Do not ever accept anything hook, line and sinker. Many of you have questioned me in the past or you have questioned Tim. There is nothing wrong with that. If I point forth a premise or something that was done, I would expect people to question and want more than just accept what's stated. That's what makes the internet the internet. It is not for the faint of heart.

Are people perfect ... nope, not by a long shot. However, acting rude to those that have been a apart of this story and searched long before it was ever the en vogue thing to do and without a "Date Line" exclusive is hardly a way to gain favor. If you want attacked, maybe I should share some emails.

Questioning is not attacking. I would say as always be civil ... however, making people accountable to questioning is an important part of life. One better be able to hold up to questions and defend their point of view. Especially if one wants to be on the net.

___________________________________________________________________________


I just have to say BRAVO!!! Wonderful post Red.  I am not a popular poster here at SM, I know I have not contributed a lot of information that can help solve this case, but I think when you get a group of concerned and caring people together, they can do great things.  I can only ask questions and give my opinion.  I can agree and I can disagree.  I hope I have done that with respect to other posters.  I tend to question everything and analyze everything.  That is just my nature.  I will not apologize for that.  I like to know the what, where, when, and who.  That is why I am here at SM. 

JMO


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #787 12/24/08 -
Post by: klaasend on December 30, 2008, 12:39:21 AM
ldstlou - I know you are only trying to stand up and protect Kyle and the crew of the Persistence against those who may have questions regarding some of the things Kyle has said, etc.

You are standing up for what you believe in and that is to be commended, however, what if you are wrong?  I'm not saying it's so but what if you and Natalee's are being lied to?

When things don't seem right, we take a closer look.   Is that so wrong?

Hypothetical:

One of Joran's friends is posting in a private invite only forum where the members sign a confidentiality agreement not to copy and paste info posted in the forum on the outside.  This friend tells of information that would solve the case and put Joran in jail for the rest of his life.
  Do you tell others about this or do you honor the confidentiality agreement?

I trust people...you know I do Klaas...I believed for a while that Caylee might have been kidnapped. But YOU taught me to put aside emotions and go for the facts..and I did this with Kyle.
Again...what came out...came out. If I were Kermit, I would not have done it the way she did. But regardless...to take Kyles's obvious concerns that he expressed to the Freebirds...who are KNOWN to publish the facts...in my mind, shows he was not part of some conspiracy, but was as dedicated to the truth as we are. I just think it is so wrong, to then take his concerns he expressed to Natalee's family and to the Freebirds and use them against him as Kermit has done...again..imho...is wrong. It's not the info I a so opposed to, it is what she did with the info. Fine, nothing is private...but at least say what happened when portraying the info. Kyle had concerns...and in my mind...expressed them openly with the Freebirds. H wasn't hiding anything...to the contrary...he expressed them to people committed to justice for Natalee. Why make it out as anything other than what happened? That is what I can'twrap my mind around.

And I understand all of that.  What concerns me is some of the stuff about Kyle and the others shopping around to make money off the trap photos that possibly show the remains of someone (according to Kyle) before telling Natalee's family about their concerns.  Justice for Natalee and getting information to Natalee's family should have come before any attempt to gain monitarily from the trap photos IMO.  If none of this is true then refute what Kermit has posted. 


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #787 12/24/08 -
Post by: wreck on December 30, 2008, 12:39:28 AM
ldstlou - I know you are only trying to stand up and protect Kyle and the crew of the Persistence against those who may have questions regarding some of the things Kyle has said, etc.

You are standing up for what you believe in and that is to be commended, however, what if you are wrong?  I'm not saying it's so but what if you and Natalee's are being lied to?

When things don't seem right, we take a closer look.   Is that so wrong?

Hypothetical:

One of Joran's friends is posting in a private invite only forum where the members sign a confidentiality agreement not to copy and paste info posted in the forum on the outside.  This friend tells of information that would solve the case and put Joran in jail for the rest of his life.
  Do you tell others about this or do you honor the confidentiality agreement?

I trust people...you know I do Klaas...I believed for a while that Caylee might have been kidnapped. But YOU taught me to put aside emotions and go for the facts..and I did this with Kyle.
Again...what came out...came out. If I were Kermit, I would not have done it the way she did. But regardless...to take Kyles's obvious concerns that he expressed to the Freebirds...who are KNOWN to publish the facts...in my mind, shows he was not part of some conspiracy, but was as dedicated to the truth as we are. I just think it is so wrong, to then take his concerns he expressed to Natalee's family and to the Freebirds and use them against him as Kermit has done...again..imho...is wrong. It's not the info I a so opposed to, it is what she did with the info. Fine, nothing is private...but at least say what happened when portraying the info. Kyle had concerns...and in my mind...expressed them openly with the Freebirds. H wasn't hiding anything...to the contrary...he expressed them to people committed to justice for Natalee. Why make it out as anything other than what happened? That is what I can'twrap my mind around.
I think you have ONLY listened to Kyle's side (and then - even just recently). There was a 2 month period where Kyle was NOT forthright. I think he was well-intenioned at first, he was led astray and is only recently trying to make himself look honorable again.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #787 12/24/08 -
Post by: ldstlou on December 30, 2008, 12:50:47 AM
ldstlou - I know you are only trying to stand up and protect Kyle and the crew of the Persistence against those who may have questions regarding some of the things Kyle has said, etc.

You are standing up for what you believe in and that is to be commended, however, what if you are wrong?  I'm not saying it's so but what if you and Natalee's are being lied to?

When things don't seem right, we take a closer look.   Is that so wrong?

Hypothetical:

One of Joran's friends is posting in a private invite only forum where the members sign a confidentiality agreement not to copy and paste info posted in the forum on the outside.  This friend tells of information that would solve the case and put Joran in jail for the rest of his life.
  Do you tell others about this or do you honor the confidentiality agreement?

I trust people...you know I do Klaas...I believed for a while that Caylee might have been kidnapped. But YOU taught me to put aside emotions and go for the facts..and I did this with Kyle.
Again...what came out...came out. If I were Kermit, I would not have done it the way she did. But regardless...to take Kyles's obvious concerns that he expressed to the Freebirds...who are KNOWN to publish the facts...in my mind, shows he was not part of some conspiracy, but was as dedicated to the truth as we are. I just think it is so wrong, to then take his concerns he expressed to Natalee's family and to the Freebirds and use them against him as Kermit has done...again..imho...is wrong. It's not the info I a so opposed to, it is what she did with the info. Fine, nothing is private...but at least say what happened when portraying the info. Kyle had concerns...and in my mind...expressed them openly with the Freebirds. H wasn't hiding anything...to the contrary...he expressed them to people committed to justice for Natalee. Why make it out as anything other than what happened? That is what I can'twrap my mind around.
I think you have ONLY listened to Kyle's side (and then - even just recently). There was a 2 month period where Kyle was NOT forthright. I think he was well-intenioned at first, he was led astray and is only recently trying to make himself look honorable again.

Wreck, he was on another job and on another ship. When he came home he inquired about the cloth they found and found out it took waaaay too long to get it to the FBI for testing...and found out about a legal clause Aruba got away with...another long story...tell Kermit to tell you about that one...that says they can only test against Natalee's shirt...great legal maneuver by Aruba.
I just found out about Peaches. I have stayed away from SM because of this stuff...and I had no idea Peaches passed and now I have to go cry for awhile. I loved that Lady I never met but wore her name on my back when I did my race for the cure. I am still so shocked. I can't believe it...how did I miss her getting so sick again? See why we have to fix this???!!! I need to go cry for awhile now.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #787 12/24/08 -
Post by: Keepthefaith on December 30, 2008, 12:53:13 AM
Why have a Confidentiality Agreement when all you seek is the truth?Is the TRUTH now a commodity to be bartered and traded?Should the TRUTH not be FREE??Just questions..So the TRUTH isn't FREE??


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #787 12/24/08 -
Post by: Tamikosmom on December 30, 2008, 12:53:42 AM
The bottom line is ... Kyle Kingman could have exposed the Persistence hoax to the family and the FBI the minute he step foot on American soil.  Maybe ... just maybe ... pressure could have been put on Aruba at that point in time to ... reveal the contents of the trap/cage ... the contents that Kyle ... in his own words ... believes could have been the remains of Natalee Holloway.

I will not apologize.  My loyalty is with the family of Natalee Holloway.  Kyle betrayed the family of Natalee Holloway when he made the choice upon his return to America to post on both a private and open forum regarding his concerns encompassing the John S./Aruban connection.  Kyle betrayed the family of Natalee Holloway when he made the choice to make a deal with the major networks.

I am angry at Kyle Kingman and ... I will not uphold him.  His betrayal of the family of Natalee Holloway makes him unworthy to be upheld.

However ... I do not hate Kyle Kingman.

If he were my son ... my words would be no different.  He has done wrong and ... he must attempt to right the wrong.

The opportunity may have been missed to bring Natalee Holloway home but ... revealing ALL regarding the Persistence hoax to the family and the FBI and ... asking God and the family's forgiveness could be a start.

Then working along side of the family and the FBI pressuring the "powers that be" in Aruban to reveal the truth encompassing the contents of the trap/cage may be the next steps.

There will be consequences but ... to be free from the burden of wrongdoing will pale in comparison and ... I know that Kyle knows it.

Janet


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #787 12/24/08 -
Post by: Keepthefaith on December 30, 2008, 12:56:16 AM
ldstlou - I know you are only trying to stand up and protect Kyle and the crew of the Persistence against those who may have questions regarding some of the things Kyle has said, etc.

You are standing up for what you believe in and that is to be commended, however, what if you are wrong?  I'm not saying it's so but what if you and Natalee's are being lied to?

When things don't seem right, we take a closer look.   Is that so wrong?

Hypothetical:

One of Joran's friends is posting in a private invite only forum where the members sign a confidentiality agreement not to copy and paste info posted in the forum on the outside.  This friend tells of information that would solve the case and put Joran in jail for the rest of his life.
  Do you tell others about this or do you honor the confidentiality agreement?

I trust people...you know I do Klaas...I believed for a while that Caylee might have been kidnapped. But YOU taught me to put aside emotions and go for the facts..and I did this with Kyle.
Again...what came out...came out. If I were Kermit, I would not have done it the way she did. But regardless...to take Kyles's obvious concerns that he expressed to the Freebirds...who are KNOWN to publish the facts...in my mind, shows he was not part of some conspiracy, but was as dedicated to the truth as we are. I just think it is so wrong, to then take his concerns he expressed to Natalee's family and to the Freebirds and use them against him as Kermit has done...again..imho...is wrong. It's not the info I a so opposed to, it is what she did with the info. Fine, nothing is private...but at least say what happened when portraying the info. Kyle had concerns...and in my mind...expressed them openly with the Freebirds. H wasn't hiding anything...to the contrary...he expressed them to people committed to justice for Natalee. Why make it out as anything other than what happened? That is what I can'twrap my mind around.
I think you have ONLY listened to Kyle's side (and then - even just recently). There was a 2 month period where Kyle was NOT forthright. I think he was well-intenioned at first, he was led astray and is only recently trying to make himself look honorable again.

Wreck, he was on another job and on another ship. When he came home he inquired about the cloth they found and found out it took waaaay too long to get it to the FBI for testing...and found out about a legal clause Aruba got away with...another long story...tell Kermit to tell you about that one...that says they can only test against Natalee's shirt...great legal maneuver by Aruba.
I just found out about Peaches. I have stayed away from SM because of this stuff...and I had no idea Peaches passed and now I have to go cry for awhile. I loved that Lady I never met but wore her name on my back when I did my race for the cure. I am still so shocked. I can't believe it...how did I miss her getting so sick again? See why we have to fix this???!!! I need to go cry for awhile now.

Again.Therein lies the problem.Who trusted the ALE??Kyle tells us in his own words.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #787 12/24/08 -
Post by: Artcolley on December 30, 2008, 12:57:28 AM
I have been reading a bit tonight and have to chime in and say that a lot of us are still around. We haven't left , so to say that a lot of people have left this site is incorrect.

Speaking for myself, I have pretty much figured out what has happend to Natalee and just am praying for the day she is found. However, I do enjoy any bit of news that is reported.
Oh, I could go on and on and bloviate about far fetched theories, but I'd rather read and try and figure things out from the facts that have been presented.

 I appreciate all of you here and all you have done for Natalee and her family. I am also sure they appreciate it.

Regarding Kyle and Kermit, at this point in time, from what I have seen, Kermit is the only one backing up his/her posts with links and facts and stayed around for questions. Kyle ran off.
That tells me a lot.

I will say one thing, if any news breaks on this case, you will see all the monkeys right here for the news.

I am tired and hope this makes sense.

Yes, San, I also stand with the "nuts", lol


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #787 12/24/08 -
Post by: San on December 30, 2008, 01:02:16 AM
I have been reading a bit tonight and have to chime in and say that a lot of us are still around. We haven't left , so to say that a lot of people have left this site is incorrect.

Speaking for myself, I have pretty much figured out what has happend to Natalee and just am praying for the day she is found. However, I do enjoy any bit of news that is reported.
Oh, I could go on and on and bloviate about far fetched theories, but I'd rather read and try and figure things out from the facts that have been presented.

 I appreciate all of you here and all you have done for Natalee and her family. I am also sure they appreciate it.

Regarding Kyle and Kermit, at this point in time, from what I have seen, Kermit is the only one backing up his/her posts with links and facts and stayed around for questions. Kyle ran off.
That tells me a lot.

I will say one thing, if any news breaks on this case, you will see all the monkeys right here for the news.

I am tired and hope this makes sense.

Yes, San, I also stand with the "nuts", lol

Thank you Artcolley for your post.  On this note I am going to say goodnight.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #787 12/24/08 -
Post by: KYcat on December 30, 2008, 01:05:02 AM
I have been reading a bit tonight and have to chime in and say that a lot of us are still around. We haven't left , so to say that a lot of people have left this site is incorrect.

Speaking for myself, I have pretty much figured out what has happend to Natalee and just am praying for the day she is found. However, I do enjoy any bit of news that is reported.
Oh, I could go on and on and bloviate about far fetched theories, but I'd rather read and try and figure things out from the facts that have been presented.

 I appreciate all of you here and all you have done for Natalee and her family. I am also sure they appreciate it.

Regarding Kyle and Kermit, at this point in time, from what I have seen, Kermit is the only one backing up his/her posts with links and facts and stayed around for questions. Kyle ran off.
That tells me a lot.

I will say one thing, if any news breaks on this case, you will see all the monkeys right here for the news.

I am tired and hope this makes sense.

Yes, San, I also stand with the "nuts", lol

Good Post.  I agree, if any news breaks, the monkeys will be here.  We aren't going anywhere!

I like nuts.   :smt101


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #787 12/24/08 -
Post by: Artcolley on December 30, 2008, 01:07:24 AM
Nuts are GOOD!    ::MonkeyDance::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #787 12/24/08 -
Post by: Keepthefaith on December 30, 2008, 01:07:54 AM
I'm still tryin to understand why people don't believe Kyle's own words???What am i missing? ::MonkeyConfused::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #787 12/24/08 -
Post by: KYcat on December 30, 2008, 01:09:25 AM
Good Night San.  Sleep tight.   :smt052



Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #787 12/24/08 -
Post by: texasmom on December 30, 2008, 01:10:04 AM


Goodnight San!  I'm standing with the nuts too!    ::MonkeyCool::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #787 12/24/08 -
Post by: KYcat on December 30, 2008, 01:10:30 AM
Nuts are GOOD!    ::MonkeyDance::

Very Good!

 ::MonkeyHaHa::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #787 12/24/08 -
Post by: Sleuth on December 30, 2008, 01:11:04 AM

It is good to see the passion that monkeys possess - now if that can only be corraled towards checking the details (and yes, questioning) vs. quarreling with each other.

My sig from the very beginning has been check every detail - check it twice (admittedly the added "at least check it once" was a direct jab at the ALE).  In order to check every detail, one must question.  Those that are being questioned have the ability to defend themselves and should be able to back up what they have said.  They alone know their motives and if they are acting for their own personal gain.

I admire those that have spent their time and talent doing their part in trying to bring Natalee home.  The ones that I admire the most are those that have walked the walk, but have avoided talking the talk -those that have nothing to gain personally, and do their part without fanfare or without patting themselves on the back.  There is unbelievable amounts of time, effort and talent that goes on behind the scenes (we all know Klaas, Red and Dugga never sleep) to try to bring closure for Natalee's family.

 
(http://i14.photobucket.com/albums/a335/my_photos_/Three-Koalas--C11762396.jpg)


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #787 12/24/08 -
Post by: texasmom on December 30, 2008, 01:11:50 AM
Nuts are GOOD!    ::MonkeyDance::

I agree Artcolley!  I love nuts!   ::MonkeyDance::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #787 12/24/08 -
Post by: klaasend on December 30, 2008, 01:11:50 AM
I'm still tryin to understand why people don't believe Kyle's own words???What am i missing? ::MonkeyConfused::

Well because they are copied and may possibly be taken out of context.  That's why if they aren't his true words and if they are taken out of context I wish he would post his side.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #787 12/24/08 -
Post by: Rooscrew on December 30, 2008, 01:14:02 AM
I have been reading a bit tonight and have to chime in and say that a lot of us are still around. We haven't left , so to say that a lot of people have left this site is incorrect.

Speaking for myself, I have pretty much figured out what has happend to Natalee and just am praying for the day she is found. However, I do enjoy any bit of news that is reported.
Oh, I could go on and on and bloviate about far fetched theories, but I'd rather read and try and figure things out from the facts that have been presented.

 I appreciate all of you here and all you have done for Natalee and her family. I am also sure they appreciate it.

Regarding Kyle and Kermit, at this point in time, from what I have seen, Kermit is the only one backing up his/her posts with links and facts and stayed around for questions. Kyle ran off.
That tells me a lot.

I will say one thing, if any news breaks on this case, you will see all the monkeys right here for the news.

I am tired and hope this makes sense.

Yes, San, I also stand with the "nuts", lol

Art~
I agree with everything you posted. It's good to see you!  ::MonkeyCool::
I'm still here lurking & reading every word. This is the only place I go for news about Natalee, there's no place like HOME.

Red~
Thank-You for your posts tonight, what you've said shows the cage is doing right. Thanks so very much for SM, it's the best place on the internet!!   ::MonkeyDance::

Klaas, San, 2NJ, Nut, Muffy, CBB (I'm hoping I'm not forgetting any mods here)
THANKS FOR ALL YOU DO!!  YOU ROCK!!!

Thanks to all the monkeys who bring the news to the cage & the translations of articles in English for us here!!

Roos~


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #787 12/24/08 -
Post by: texasmom on December 30, 2008, 01:14:12 AM

It is good to see the passion that monkeys possess - now if that can only be corraled towards checking the details (and yes, questioning) vs. quarreling with each other.

My sig from the very beginning has been check every detail - check it twice (admittedly the added "at least check it once" was a direct jab at the ALE).  In order to check every detail, one must question.  Those that are being questioned have the ability to defend themselves and should be able to back up what they have said.  They alone know their motives and if they are acting for their own personal gain.

I admire those that have spent their time and talent doing their part in trying to bring Natalee home.  The ones that I admire the most are those that have walked the walk, but have avoided talking the talk -those that have nothing to gain personally, and do their part without fanfare or without patting themselves on the back.  There is unbelievable amounts of time, effort and talent that goes on behind the scenes (we all know Klaas, Red and Dugga never sleep) to try to bring closure for Natalee's family.

 
(http://i14.photobucket.com/albums/a335/my_photos_/Three-Koalas--C11762396.jpg)

I agree Sleuth!   ::MonkeyCool::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #787 12/24/08 -
Post by: Artcolley on December 30, 2008, 01:16:56 AM
I agree, hearing Kyles own words would be helpful.

And with that, this nut must get to bed, I have to get my son to the airport first thing in the morning.

Nite all and Sweet Dreams


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #787 12/24/08 -
Post by: Magnolia on December 30, 2008, 01:17:24 AM
I think it needs to be remembered that Kermit gave Kyle
every opportunity to reveal his feelings about the findings
of the Persistence here at SM.

Kyle obviously was aware of this and came here and posted
several wordy posts that essentially said nothing.
Kermit told Kyle that if Kyle didn't tell it that Kermit would.
Kermit tried to get Kyle to reveal what he knew, without
Kermit having to do so.

It was not a sneak attack.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #787 12/24/08 -
Post by: Keepthefaith on December 30, 2008, 01:20:30 AM
I'm still tryin to understand why people don't believe Kyle's own words???What am i missing? ::MonkeyConfused::

Well because they are copied and may possibly be taken out of context.  That's why if they aren't his true words and if they are taken out of context I wish he would post his side.

That's why i'd be very interested to understand the parameters of the search!In terms of protocol with the ALE.I'm not sure i'd like to hear everything in context.JMOO."IF" all the logs to the Persistence truly are gone that is unfortunate.When was ALE contacted regarding the contents of the cage and why?I don't think there's a Monkey who wouldn't have dived on that cage first and check it out before the ALE.Correct me if i'm wrong.The only way that they would have known the cage was found was either ALE being onboard 24/7 watching or Someone aboard the Persistence calling them and then waiting for them to come out....


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #787 12/24/08 -
Post by: Artcolley on December 30, 2008, 01:20:36 AM
Hey, Roos!
Nice to see you too!

Yes, no place like Home...
THere are a LOT of us still here even though sometimes we are not posting. Natalee will not be forgotten by any of us.

Nite nite


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #787 12/24/08 -
Post by: texasmom on December 30, 2008, 01:21:34 AM
I agree, hearing Kyles own words would be helpful.

And with that, this nut must get to bed, I have to get my son to the airport first thing in the morning.

Nite all and Sweet Dreams

Goodnight, and sweet dreams Artcolley!  It was very good to see you, hope you'll stop by and post more often!  I hope your son has a good trip tomorrow.  Take care!

 ::MonkeyCool::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #787 12/24/08 -
Post by: texasmom on December 30, 2008, 01:23:03 AM
I think it needs to be remembered that Kermit gave Kyle
every opportunity to reveal his feelings about the findings
of the Persistence here at SM.

Kyle obviously was aware of this and came here and posted
several wordy posts that essentially said nothing.
Kermit told Kyle that if Kyle didn't tell it that Kermit would.
Kermit tried to get Kyle to reveal what he knew, without
Kermit having to do so.

It was not a sneak attack.

You are correct Magnolia, and those facts should not be forgotten!


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #787 12/24/08 -
Post by: KYcat on December 30, 2008, 01:23:38 AM
I'm still tryin to understand why people don't believe Kyle's own words???What am i missing? ::MonkeyConfused::

Well because they are copied and may possibly be taken out of context.  That's why if they aren't his true words and if they are taken out of context I wish he would post his side.

Agree.  Does Kyle stand by what he has done?  If there have been things taken out of context why doesn't he defend himself?  If you have not done anything wrong why be afraid of the truth?

I have drawn my own conclusions and have my own thoughts about what was done on the Persistence.  I have done this with the information that has been provided thru blogs and the news.  If I am wrong in my opinions it will have to be changed with a direct declaration and proof from Kyle himself. 

JMO


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #787 12/24/08 -
Post by: KYcat on December 30, 2008, 01:26:43 AM
Goodnight Artcolley!  Sweet dreams.  Safe trip for your son!


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #787 12/24/08 -
Post by: klaasend on December 30, 2008, 01:27:23 AM
Nite Artcolley

Magnolia - exactly!


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #787 12/24/08 -
Post by: Anna on December 30, 2008, 01:27:39 AM
The Freebirds have done great research, I'm sure their hearts are all in the right place. But, that doesn't make them infallible.

I agree they did great work.  Where did Freebirds get all their information.  They got it from people asking questions and finding out information on message boards that shared the information with everyone.


You are exactly correct, San.  Freebirds have done a wonderful job of compiling information and presenting it in concise articles that are very comprehensive.  Yet I have never seen any original information that did not openly appear on forums such as this and have even seen a couple of original thoughts of monkeys included.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #787 12/24/08 -
Post by: KYcat on December 30, 2008, 01:27:55 AM
You monkeys are so fast at posting.  LOL  I was typing my post when others were already posting saying what I was thinking!!!!!

 ::MonkeyConfused::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #787 12/24/08 -
Post by: KYcat on December 30, 2008, 01:30:00 AM
The Freebirds have done great research, I'm sure their hearts are all in the right place. But, that doesn't make them infallible.

I agree they did great work.  Where did Freebirds get all their information.  They got it from people asking questions and finding out information on message boards that shared the information with everyone.


You are exactly correct, San.  Freebirds have done a wonderful job of compiling information and presenting it in concise articles that are very comprehensive.  Yet I have never seen any original information that did not openly appear on forums such as this and have even seen a couple of original thoughts of monkeys included.

Monkeys do a wonderful job of compiling info and research also.  Kudos to SM.  Thats why I am here. 


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #787 12/24/08 -
Post by: Tamikosmom on December 30, 2008, 01:31:20 AM
I'm still tryin to understand why people don't believe Kyle's own words???What am i missing? ::MonkeyConfused::

Well because they are copied and may possibly be taken out of context.  That's why if they aren't his true words and if they are taken out of context I wish he would post his side.


Klaas ... Kermit has upheld the family of Natalee Holloway since the getgo.  Kermit has researched and shared all aspects of his/her research with Natalee Holloway forums since the getgo.

I do not believe there is any foundation that would cause any of us to suspect for one minute that Kermit would post deceptively in an attempt to undermine Kyle ... undermine the Persistence endeavor.

I cannot comprehend how Kyle Kingman who betrayed the family of Natalee Holloway is being embraced while Kermit ... who is one of our own ... is having his message negated.

Janet


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #787 12/24/08 -
Post by: Buckeye on December 30, 2008, 01:31:23 AM
The Freebirds have done great research, I'm sure their hearts are all in the right place. But, that doesn't make them infallible.

I agree they did great work.  Where did Freebirds get all their information.  They got it from people asking questions and finding out information on message boards that shared the information with everyone.

 :smt045 :smt045 :smt045

he expressed them to people committed to justice for Natalee.

I admire Freebirds but they certainly are not the only ones committed to Natalee.  It bothers me that this was stated two times.



Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #787 12/24/08 -
Post by: klaasend on December 30, 2008, 01:35:12 AM
I'm still tryin to understand why people don't believe Kyle's own words???What am i missing? ::MonkeyConfused::

Well because they are copied and may possibly be taken out of context.  That's why if they aren't his true words and if they are taken out of context I wish he would post his side.


Klaas ... Kermit has upheld the family of Natalee Holloway since the getgo.  Kermit has researched and shared all aspects of his/her research with Natalee Holloway forums since the getgo.

I do not believe there is any foundation that would cause any of us to suspect for one minute that Kermit would post deceptively in an attempt to undermine Kyle ... undermine the Persistence endeavor.

I cannot comprehend how Kyle Kingman who betrayed the family of Natalee Holloway is being embraced while Kermit ... who is one of our own ... is having his message negated.

Janet

Janet I agree with you.  The question was how can anyone question Kyle's own words?  My answer in essence was that without actually seeing Kyle type or say the words, parts could be taken out of context.  I'm just saying that if Kyle believes anything is taken out of context it's up to HIM and not Hotshot or Ldstlou to set us straight.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #787 12/24/08 -
Post by: Tamikosmom on December 30, 2008, 01:37:34 AM
GOOD NIGHT MONKEYS!!!  GOOD NIGHT ZOO GEEPERS!!

Janet
10:40 PM PT


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #787 12/24/08 -
Post by: KYcat on December 30, 2008, 01:40:03 AM
Goodnight Janet.  :smt039


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #787 12/24/08 -
Post by: Anna on December 30, 2008, 01:40:26 AM
Natalee's story is E! right now.  Starting with Peter De Vries and Patrick tapes.


Yes, I saw this as well and believe it was new coverage. 


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #787 12/24/08 -
Post by: texasmom on December 30, 2008, 01:41:51 AM
The Freebirds have done great research, I'm sure their hearts are all in the right place. But, that doesn't make them infallible.

I agree they did great work.  Where did Freebirds get all their information.  They got it from people asking questions and finding out information on message boards that shared the information with everyone.

 :smt045 :smt045 :smt045

he expressed them to people committed to justice for Natalee.

I admire Freebirds but they certainly are not the only ones committed to Natalee.  It bothers me that this was stated two times.



Thank you Buckeye, it bothered me too!


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #787 12/24/08 -
Post by: KYcat on December 30, 2008, 01:42:09 AM
Goodnight all Monkeys.  My eyes are burning and my head hurts!  Hopefully sleep will help.



Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #787 12/24/08 -
Post by: Keepthefaith on December 30, 2008, 01:43:44 AM
I'm still tryin to understand why people don't believe Kyle's own words???What am i missing? ::MonkeyConfused::

Well because they are copied and may possibly be taken out of context.  That's why if they aren't his true words and if they are taken out of context I wish he would post his side.


Klaas ... Kermit has upheld the family of Natalee Holloway since the getgo.  Kermit has researched and shared all aspects of his/her research with Natalee Holloway forums since the getgo.

I do not believe there is any foundation that would cause any of us to suspect for one minute that Kermit would post deceptively in an attempt to undermine Kyle ... undermine the Persistence endeavor.

I cannot comprehend how Kyle Kingman who betrayed the family of Natalee Holloway is being embraced while Kermit ... who is one of our own ... is having his message negated.

Janet

Janet I agree with you.  The question was how can anyone question Kyle's own words?  My answer in essence was that without actually seeing Kyle type or say the words, parts could be taken out of context.  I'm just saying that if Kyle believes anything is taken out of context it's up to HIM and not Hotshot or Ldstlou to set us straight.

Why Hotshot and ldstlou?As far as i can recollect i've not been privy to any other poster defending Kyle(OE).Not that it's wrong to defend him.Seems like a concerted effort.Do they know him personally?What is their relationship with Kyle?


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #787 12/24/08 -
Post by: texasmom on December 30, 2008, 01:44:26 AM
GOOD NIGHT MONKEYS!!!  GOOD NIGHT ZOO GEEPERS!!

Janet
10:40 PM PT

Goodnight Janet!  I appreciate you!   ::MonkeyCool::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #787 12/24/08 -
Post by: klaasend on December 30, 2008, 01:47:40 AM
Keepthefaith - I don't think either Hotshot or Ldstlou know Kyle personally although I suppose I could be wrong.  I believe they trust what he has told them. 

I believe that only Kyle can refute Kermit's posts and Kyle chooses not to.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #787 12/24/08 -
Post by: klaasend on December 30, 2008, 01:48:27 AM
GOODNIGHT ALL!  


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #787 12/24/08 -
Post by: texasmom on December 30, 2008, 01:49:06 AM
Goodnight all Monkeys.  My eyes are burning and my head hurts!  Hopefully sleep will help.



Goodnight KYcat!  I hope you feel better!   :smt056


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #787 12/24/08 -
Post by: texasmom on December 30, 2008, 01:50:15 AM
GOODNIGHT ALL!  

Goodnight Klaas!   ::MonkeyCool::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #787 12/24/08 -
Post by: Keepthefaith on December 30, 2008, 01:53:12 AM
GOODNIGHT ALL!  

Goodnight Klass.Thanx!


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #787 12/24/08 -
Post by: crazybabyborg on December 30, 2008, 02:02:54 AM
I don't know if this is a good way to let posters know, so forgive me, please, if it isn't. I flipped to the lounge, and out of habit always look to see if Peaches is showing as the last poster in her thread.  I've been anxious about an update. My heart stopped when I saw the topic title. I post this here, knowing there is no good way to tell anyone that remembers Peaches from her active days in Natalee's discussion and her inspiration in her own rally prayer thread. Scared Monkeys has lost a friend. This world has lost a truly special and inspirational person. Our prayers should continue for her family and loved ones. Peaches made her mark in this world and has left a permanent thumbprint on my heart.


(http://i25.photobucket.com/albums/c100/crazybabyborgs/originals/Peaches.gif)


Dear Father, Thank you for Your gift of Peaches to us. Please hold those who love her in Your hands and bring them Your Comfort. Manifest in the lives of all those who are hurting now, Your promise that all things work for good who love the Lord and are called according to His purpose. Amen.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #787 12/24/08 -
Post by: Anna on December 30, 2008, 02:10:27 AM
I haven't bashed anybody and I do resent being accused of having done so when I haven't.  I also don't accept anyone telling me what to think or ask.

I am still asking how we know if those were Natalee's remains in the fish trap and now how will we ever know?  Kyle is the one who implied that they were.

Many of us, myself included, kept warning that ALE was not to be trusted with evidence as they had a way of making that disappear.  And yet many of us have withheld judgment and been content to see what if anything at this late date can develop now that evidence or potential evidence was lost by handing it over to ALE with the bottomless evidence drawer. 

What bothers me most is some running to this already very troubled and harmed family with tales from forums and presenting their own personal point of view to the family, etc.  Once it was wrongly even suggested SM was saying the family had the remains and were concealing that, a totally inaccurate statement and something never even suggested here.

I think the majority have not even chosen "sides" in all this and are just wanting to know what was meant by Kyle saying if that was not Natalee in the cage, it was one of the great WTF moments, etc.

And when the results were posted from the FBI, Wreck, me and others immediately pointed out that apparently there was only a comparison with the blouse so nothing new there, either.

I don't get too excited about anything any more as I know nothing is likely to come of it in the end anyway.  First Aruba has to want to be conducting an actual investigation and looking for information.  Until that happens, nothing much is going to matter anyway.

People are free to post here or not but they are not free to run to this family and misportray and wrongly claim that all SM speaks as one voice when that is just not true at all.  No one should be lying and saying Sm said this or that when it is just not true.  No one has the right to speak for me in that manner.  Some may have said but that is not SM as a whole.

And people should not post things if they don't want them questioned.  My posts have always been raked over the coals and I don't have a problem with that.  I may or may not respond but I don't deny anybody the right to ask.  And I don't have to bother this family with every question, either.

So, yes, guess I will just stand with you people, the nuts.  Been here too long to do otherwise but we do not speak as a single voice and never have.  I am still not convinced that was Natalee in the trap but Kyle is the one who mostly said that it was.  Why is it so wrong to ask why he said that?  Why is that bashing?


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #787 12/24/08 -
Post by: Keepthefaith on December 30, 2008, 02:12:16 AM
.........................................JUSTICE FOR NATALEE.................................................

..................................QUESTION,QUESTION,QUESTION...........................................




..........................................TRUTH & JUSTICE......................................................


..MONKEY'S ::MonkeyDance:: MONKEY'S ::MonkeyDance:: MONKEY'S ::MonkeyDance::..

                                       TO ALL A GOOD NIGHT
                                         ::MonkeyTongue::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #787 12/24/08 -
Post by: texasmom on December 30, 2008, 02:15:03 AM
.........................................JUSTICE FOR NATALEE.................................................

..................................QUESTION,QUESTION,QUESTION...........................................




..........................................TRUTH & JUSTICE......................................................


..MONKEY'S ::MonkeyDance:: MONKEY'S ::MonkeyDance:: MONKEY'S ::MonkeyDance::..

                                       TO ALL A GOOD NIGHT
                                         ::MonkeyTongue::

Goodnight keepthefaith!   ::MonkeyCool::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #787 12/24/08 -
Post by: Keepthefaith on December 30, 2008, 02:15:07 AM
.........................................JUSTICE FOR NATALEE.................................................

..................................QUESTION,QUESTION,QUESTION...........................................




..........................................TRUTH & JUSTICE......................................................


..MONKEY'S ::MonkeyDance:: MONKEY'S ::MonkeyDance:: MONKEY'S ::MonkeyDance::..

                                       TO ALL A GOOD NIGHT
                                         ::MonkeyTongue::

LOL  ::cartwheel:: ::cartwheel:: ::cartwheel:: ::cartwheel:: ::cartwheel:: ::cartwheel::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #787 12/24/08 -
Post by: Anna on December 30, 2008, 02:18:15 AM
Yes, we are all deeply saddened by the death of Peaches.  I will make sure Tylergal knows about this as well.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #787 12/24/08 -
Post by: crazybabyborg on December 30, 2008, 02:20:16 AM
Thanks, Anna. I'm sure Tyler would want t know. Please tell her I miss her.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #787 12/24/08 -
Post by: texasmom on December 30, 2008, 02:20:44 AM
(http://i21.photobucket.com/albums/b258/texasmom55/Natalee/CarpePicNatalee1.png)

                   JUSTICE FOR NATALEE!!!!


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #787 12/24/08 -
Post by: hotping on December 30, 2008, 02:28:46 AM
I don't know if this is a good way to let posters know, so forgive me, please, if it isn't. I flipped to the lounge, and out of habit always look to see if Peaches is showing as the last poster in her thread.  I've been anxious about an update. My heart stopped when I saw the topic title. I post this here, knowing there is no good way to tell anyone that remembers Peaches from her active days in Natalee's discussion and her inspiration in her own rally prayer thread. Scared Monkeys has lost a friend. This world has lost a truly special and inspirational person. Our prayers should continue for her family and loved ones. Peaches made her mark in this world and has left a permanent thumbprint on my heart.


(http://i25.photobucket.com/albums/c100/crazybabyborgs/originals/Peaches.gif)


Dear Father, Thank you for Your gift of Peaches to us. Please hold those who love her in Your hands and bring them Your Comfort. Manifest in the lives of all those who are hurting now, Your promise that all things work for good who love the Lord and are called according to His purpose. Amen.
Amen.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #787 12/24/08 -
Post by: iris44 on December 30, 2008, 04:10:11 AM
I think the postings about Kyle have been too harsh.  He clearly expressed his concerns all along and provided tons of info that would never have been available otherwise.  I also agree that some of what he said may have been taken out of context.  It's easy to question everything he did in retrospect, but I think he did his best functioning in a complex situation and had good intentions.  Sometimes things are not black and white, and of course he has to protect himself and his livelihood and reputation.  I think it was a mistake to alienate him, and I don't think he owes it to SM to defend himself.  Sometimes you are placed in a situation where it's a no-win no matter what you do. And using his religious beliefs to try to get him to come back and explain seems cruel. 


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #787 12/24/08 -
Post by: klaasend on December 30, 2008, 10:37:27 AM
http://www.amigoe.com/artman/publish/printer_50957.php

Aruba
Joran van der Sloot in Laos
29 Dec, 2008, 14:23 (GMT -04:00)



ORANGE CITY - Joran van der Sloot, the main suspect in the disappearance case of American teen Natalee Holloway in 2005, again in the Far East online. Tourists would it in the Asian country Laos have seen. For example, last week, Dutch media reported. Dutch backpackers were Van der Sloot, in the Bucks Bar, in the village of Vang Vieng, to the body. After crime reporter Peter R. Joran de Vries for the second time in a hidden camera had been, this time with 'proof' that he could make Thai women for the sex Dutch market, the suspect disappeared without trace. So now it seems that he has exchanged for Thailand from neighboring Laos


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #787 12/24/08 -
Post by: truthseeker2 on December 30, 2008, 10:56:07 AM
I think the postings about Kyle have been too harsh.  He clearly expressed his concerns all along and provided tons of info that would never have been available otherwise.  I also agree that some of what he said may have been taken out of context.  It's easy to question everything he did in retrospect, but I think he did his best functioning in a complex situation and had good intentions.  Sometimes things are not black and white, and of course he has to protect himself and his livelihood and reputation.  I think it was a mistake to alienate him, and I don't think he owes it to SM to defend himself.  Sometimes you are placed in a situation where it's a no-win no matter what you do. And using his religious beliefs to try to get him to come back and explain seems cruel. 

Thank you!!  Well said.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #787 12/24/08 -
Post by: Blonde on December 30, 2008, 11:20:26 AM
I'm still tryin to understand why people don't believe Kyle's own words???What am i missing? ::MonkeyConfused::

Well because they are copied and may possibly be taken out of context.  That's why if they aren't his true words and if they are taken out of context I wish he would post his side.


Klaas ... Kermit has upheld the family of Natalee Holloway since the getgo.  Kermit has researched and shared all aspects of his/her research with Natalee Holloway forums since the getgo.

I do not believe there is any foundation that would cause any of us to suspect for one minute that Kermit would post deceptively in an attempt to undermine Kyle ... undermine the Persistence endeavor.

I cannot comprehend how Kyle Kingman who betrayed the family of Natalee Holloway is being embraced while Kermit ... who is one of our own ... is having his message negated.

Janet

Janet I agree with you.  The question was how can anyone question Kyle's own words?  My answer in essence was that without actually seeing Kyle type or say the words, parts could be taken out of context.  I'm just saying that if Kyle believes anything is taken out of context it's up to HIM and not Hotshot or Ldstlou to set us straight.
IMO I don't think we will EVER see or hear from Kyle again.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #787 12/24/08 -
Post by: Ree on December 30, 2008, 11:50:54 AM
I'm still tryin to understand why people don't believe Kyle's own words???What am i missing? ::MonkeyConfused::

Well because they are copied and may possibly be taken out of context.  That's why if they aren't his true words and if they are taken out of context I wish he would post his side.


Klaas ... Kermit has upheld the family of Natalee Holloway since the getgo.  Kermit has researched and shared all aspects of his/her research with Natalee Holloway forums since the getgo.

I do not believe there is any foundation that would cause any of us to suspect for one minute that Kermit would post deceptively in an attempt to undermine Kyle ... undermine the Persistence endeavor.

I cannot comprehend how Kyle Kingman who betrayed the family of Natalee Holloway is being embraced while Kermit ... who is one of our own ... is having his message negated.

Janet

Janet I agree with you.  The question was how can anyone question Kyle's own words?  My answer in essence was that without actually seeing Kyle type or say the words, parts could be taken out of context.  I'm just saying that if Kyle believes anything is taken out of context it's up to HIM and not Hotshot or Ldstlou to set us straight.
IMO I don't think we will EVER see or hear from Kyle again.

Kyle's words raise questions.  If he doesn't care to come back and explain them, then I personally don't care to hear others defend him.  He seemed like a nice guy, but then I wasn't privy to all he said, because some preferred to have a secret hidey hole.  While I respect the Freebirds work, much of their material came from this site.  I don't know if Kermit is right or not, but I'd have done what she did and I respect her for doing it.  Seems odd to me as soon as the subject of Kyle comes up, the same few are here to disrupt.  He's a big boy and if he doesn't care to defend his actions, that says it all for me.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #787 12/24/08 -
Post by: KYcat on December 30, 2008, 12:05:23 PM
I think the postings about Kyle have been too harsh.  He clearly expressed his concerns all along and provided tons of info that would never have been available otherwise.  I also agree that some of what he said may have been taken out of context.  It's easy to question everything he did in retrospect, but I think he did his best functioning in a complex situation and had good intentions.  Sometimes things are not black and white, and of course he has to protect himself and his livelihood and reputation.  I think it was a mistake to alienate him, and I don't think he owes it to SM to defend himself.  Sometimes you are placed in a situation where it's a no-win no matter what you do. And using his religious beliefs to try to get him to come back and explain seems cruel. 


I disagree for several reasons:
1) He expressed concern at first then changed his mind,
quote from Kyle:

  Natalee Holloway / LCD Archive / Re: Natalee Case Discussion #715 1/25 -  on: January 26, 2008, 08:38:25 AM 
Thought you all may find this interesting if you're willing to accept it-

To date, the Aruban police and dive team has been a tremendous help.  They've honestly done a great job. Over the last month we've established a very good working relationship based on openness and trust.  Most of the relationship success was due to getting the media out of the way and working together shoulder to shoulder over time.  We've helped each other however and whenever we can.  They've treated us with decency and respect and we have treated them as friends and allies, which they are. Most of the police and divers are new since this case started and both eager and careful to do things right.  I wish we had a month ahead of the project just to establish the relationships and trust. I know many of you would likely doubt this view, but it's based on the experiences in the field of the entire search team. I too was extremely worried, paranoid, and suspecting in the beginning.  Now, it's clear we're all working towards a common goal.   

<quote>

2) I have carefully read all of Kyle's posts.  I am NOT taking what he says out of context.  At least, I don't feel that I am.  I have formed an opinion based on what I have read.  If it is out of context, then Kyle should set the record straight.  It is his choice to do this or not.  He, evidently, has decided not to come back to SM and "set the record straight" as it pertains to what he has said.  Like I said, his choice.  No one has alienated him and I am not attacking him. 

3)  Kyle is not the only one who has contributed to this case.  Lots of people with nothing but good intentions have contributed time and hard work to helping solve this case.  They are certainly as important and noteworthy. 

4) There were times that I felt that Kyle was arrogant and belittling to the posters at SM.  He contradicted himself on several levels that I found to be disturbing.  I won't quote, just read his posts.   

5)  Kyle is a grown adult man.  He is not a boy.  He can "defend" himself if he feels the need. 


quote from Kyle:
146   Natalee Holloway / LCD Archive / Re: Natalee Case Discussion #736 2/27 -  on: February 28, 2008, 10:58:40 PM 
I really didn't want to respond to all this but I feel I must. 

Please stop...and carefully think things through here.  You know who I mean.

WHAT do you think you are doing?  What do you seriously think you are going to accomplish with the pics?  Don't you even think to consider for a second that we the search team, who found the trap, supervised it's sampling, recorded that video and others... are ensuring the situation is in proper hands and being taken care of appropriately and completely?   

You are not helping anything by interfering with what you do not fully understand.  Please let the authorities do their jobs without interference.   

Robin should never have posted those pics because of the stir they would cause.  She trusted (mistakenly) people's ethics on a private forum.  One of the reasons (among many) that this case has taken so long to solve is because of the Internet, media, and well intended partially-informed people's ambitions and agendas.  Stay out of business you don't belong in.  You all know I am an ally both in the field and on the net.  I have done my best to both bring success to this case and to keep people informed and updated with what information should be provided.  We the search team have worked extremely hard over a long time.  Many of you have as well.  Let's not let our frustrations get the best of us.  Let us not let our emotions interfere with what we know to be true, and let us not forget who we are and what jobs we have to do.  Let those who are responsible do their jobs.
<quote>

In  reference to the bolded part above, I personally feel that the situation was not in the appropriate hands nor was it being taken care of appropriately and completely.

These are stricly my opinions.


These are my opinions





Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #787 12/24/08 -
Post by: Keepthefaith on December 30, 2008, 12:18:09 PM
GOOD MORNING MONKEY'S. ::MonkeyDance:: Sun in Seattle.Snow melts.. ::MonkeyDance:: ::MonkeyDance::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #787 12/24/08 -
Post by: caesu on December 30, 2008, 12:32:31 PM
http://antilliaans.caribiana.nl/aruba/car20081230_crisisAruba

Aruba economy is expexted to suffer greatly the coming year.
25% less in the hotels.

and prices of products are rising.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #787 12/24/08 -
Post by: Tamikosmom on December 30, 2008, 12:34:11 PM
 ::MonkeyWaa::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #787 12/24/08 -
Post by: Keepthefaith on December 30, 2008, 12:47:52 PM
http://antilliaans.caribiana.nl/aruba/car20081230_crisisAruba

Aruba economy is expexted to suffer greatly the coming year.
25% less in the hotels.

and prices of products are rising.

 ::MonkeyDance:: ::cartwheel:: ::MonkeyDance::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #787 12/24/08 -
Post by: Keepthefaith on December 30, 2008, 01:07:47 PM
Any news on when the new PG is in??When will Mos go on vacation and declare his cover-up is done in Aruba??


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #787 12/24/08 -
Post by: Tamikosmom on December 30, 2008, 01:20:54 PM
GOOD NIGHT MONKEYS!!!  GOOD NIGHT ZOO GEEPERS!!

Janet
10:40 PM PT

Goodnight Janet!  I appreciate you!   ::MonkeyCool::


Thank you texasmom.

This morning my heart is heavy.

I cannot get past the fact that Natalee Holloway's remains may have been in that trap/cage and ... it was her own who participated in the final coverup ... each in his own way.

Natalee Holloway's family deserved better.

Janet.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #787 12/24/08 -
Post by: caesu on December 30, 2008, 01:26:47 PM
Any news on when the new PG is in??When will Mos go on vacation and declare his cover-up is done in Aruba??

January 1st R.F. Pietersz will become PG.
now he is care-taker PG.

and i expect Mos to be replaced somewhere in the (late) spring.
but i don't have confimation of that. i bet it will be announced at the last minute as usual.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #787 12/24/08 -
Post by: Keepthefaith on December 30, 2008, 01:30:24 PM
Any news on when the new PG is in??When will Mos go on vacation and declare his cover-up is done in Aruba??

January 1st R.F. Pietersz will become PG.
now he is care-taker PG.

and i expect Mos to be replaced somewhere in the (late) spring.
but i don't have confimation of that. i bet it will be announced at the last minute as usual.

So Mos will turn over the Case  to Pietersz  when he leaves.Mos will say we have new witnesses but i'm leaving so the new PG will take over.Then take another 3 years to come up to speed?? ::MonkeyDance::

Thanx caesu!


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #787 12/24/08 -
Post by: texasmom on December 30, 2008, 01:54:12 PM
Any news on when the new PG is in??When will Mos go on vacation and declare his cover-up is done in Aruba??

I know there have already been other responses to this question, I'm bringing this forward anyway because it took me a long time to find it again.

 ::MonkeyHaHa::

http://scaredmonkeys.net/index.php?topic=4246.760

http://www.amigoe.com/artman/publish/printer_50740.php

Google translation

Aruba
'*******' Rob Pietersz will remain a solid pg
20 Dec, 2008, 13:56 (GMT -04:00)

 
Rob Pietersz is appointed new Attorney-General of the Aruban prosecutor's office.
ORANGE CITY-Robert "Rob" Pietersz Franklin (61) already since June acting Attorney-General (pg) on Aruba, remains at his place. The Empire of Ministers yesterday agreed to his appointment as' permanent 'pg of the Public Ministry (OM) by January 2009.

"I'm already asked if my period as acting pg wanted to extend permanent pg, and find it worth the relationship to continue," Pietersz said in a response. "I was initially asked for a hand to help and six months pg to be acting."

Pietersz was formerly pg of the Netherlands Antilles and has also previously agreed for a period of nine months pg been deputy of Aruba. He held the post since June, which was originally toebedacht to the Dutch former Attorney-General Dato Steenhuis, after acting pg Nico Jörg was gone. The Aruban Justice Minister Rudy Croes continued, however, publicly questioned the arrival of Steenhuis. This came a few years ago in the news because he would have his driver turned on the speed to perform and to get through safety barriers. In 1998 he was accused of conflict of interest, for which he received a reprimand.

The appointment of fixed Pietersz puts an end to the search for a permanent replacement for the Aruban Attorney General Theresa Croes of Aruba-Fernandes, who long-time home Saturday because of a labor dispute with the government over its pension. Aruba wanted a salary based on her pension payment. Croes Fernandes-employment on January 1 would have ended this year, but the conflict saw them off. Only recently, through a settlement with Croes-Fernandes, the government has a solid respect for the office managed to arrange.

In the Netherlands were the developments surrounding the appointment of the mid-pg this year followed closely by the Second Chamber Alexander Pechtold (D66) and Sybrand of Haersma-Buma (CDA). According to Pechtold was the appearance of justice in Aruba in the game. From Haersma-Buma was for law enforcement in Aruba extremely bad that there was no functioning pg.

Pietersz do not want to respond to the history. "I have noted but the period is closed. We look forward to the future. "The new pg, the Royal Decree on his appointment has not yet seen, but he assumes that the next three years, until his retirement age, Attorney-General of the Aruban OM remains.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #787 12/24/08 -
Post by: texasmom on December 30, 2008, 01:58:41 PM
GOOD NIGHT MONKEYS!!!  GOOD NIGHT ZOO GEEPERS!!

Janet
10:40 PM PT

Goodnight Janet!  I appreciate you!   ::MonkeyCool::


Thank you texasmom.

This morning my heart is heavy.

I cannot get past the fact that Natalee Holloway's remains may have been in that trap/cage and ... it was her own who participated in the final coverup ... each in his own way.

Natalee Holloway's family deserved better.

Janet.

Janet, you are not alone. 


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #787 12/24/08 -
Post by: KYcat on December 30, 2008, 02:10:33 PM
::MonkeyWaa::

Tamikosmom, why are you crying?



Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #787 12/24/08 -
Post by: texasmom on December 30, 2008, 02:10:52 PM
I want to know more about the legal maneuver that limited what the samples taken from the trap could be tested against. ldstlou made a comment about it but said we needed to ask Kermit to tell us about it.  Without looking back, I believe she said they could only be tested against the shirt/blouse of Natalee's IIRC.



Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #787 12/24/08 -
Post by: Keepthefaith on December 30, 2008, 02:16:31 PM
I want to know more about the legal maneuver that limited what the samples taken from the trap could be tested against. ldstlou made a comment about it but said we needed to ask Kermit to tell us about it.  Without looking back, I believe she said they could only be tested against the shirt/blouse of Natalee's IIRC.



They already Knew what they were sending wasn't going to be a match!The continued cover-up.Why only allow that the shirt blouse?


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #787 12/24/08 -
Post by: Tamikosmom on December 30, 2008, 02:30:16 PM
::MonkeyWaa::

Tamikosmom, why are you crying?



I am sooo sad today.

Our Peaches is gone.  My faith tells me that she is victorious ... the final battle with pain has been won and ... she in the loving embrace of her Lord and Saviour Jesus Christ.

However ... my heart grieves for her father, husband and daughter.  I am also saddened that Peaches will not be present in the flesh to enjoy all the special moments of life that lay ahead.

I had surgery for a brain tumor in 1990.  In the past almost nineteen years ... I have been privy to have attended my childrens' high school and university graduations ... childrens' weddings ... birth of grandchildren.  I plan to dance with hubby at our grandkids' weddings.

If God has blessed me with all those memories and my dreams for the future ... why not Peaches?

 ::MonkeyNoNo::

Janet


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #787 12/24/08 -
Post by: Tamikosmom on December 30, 2008, 03:44:58 PM
KYLE KINGMAN

Re: Natalee Case Discussion #782 12/5/08 -
« Reply #137 on: Today at 04:07:13 PM »


Klye: We're being fed misinformation to keep us searching and out of their way while they cover their asses, destroy evidence, cover their tracks, and keep us out at sea and away from the trap."

Kyle: John is not a believer in the trap. He took ALE's word as gospel that it wasn't case related, yet never studied the videos or bothered to inquire further. He had plans on doing business with Aruba and in S. America and he didn't want to hurt any feelings by talks hinting at lack of complete trust and friendship.

http://scaredmonkeys.net/index.php?topic=4209.120


Re: Natalee Case Discussion #744 3/19 -
« Reply #201 on: March 19, 2008, 08:21:47 PM »


We had little option other than to have the Aruban dive division recover the samples and bring them back under their care.  Remember we are Americans working in Aruban waters, subject to their laws, invitation, and blessing.  Our hands are tied for the most part. I personally was extremely uncomfortable with the chain of custody, being that we weren't a part of it, but I was powerless to do anything about it.   The samples were photographed in detail by one Aruban diver and the other two investigated the contents of the trap, the dimensions, the rigging, and what surrounded the trap.  From the video, it looked like they did a diligent and careful job with the samples and the underwater photography.  I don't know who has these pictures, but I must assume ALE.

http://scaredmonkeys.net/index.php?topic=2721.msg366857#msg366857


PRIVATE EYE - BETH HOLLOWAY'S BROTHER

Re: Natalee Case Discussion #746 4/4
« Reply #499 on: April 09, 2008, 12:39:50 AM »


If I understood Kyle correctly, and that would be that the Arubans retrieved and possessed all finds, not sharing anything with the crew, then that effort was a waste of time and effort. The only thing it could have accomplished was to locate additional evidence for the Arubans to destroy. I am not sure if that was the protocol out of Aruba's waters though. The effort was superb, but the game was fixed.

http://scaredmonkeys.net/index.php?topic=2769.msg372245;topicseen#msg372245


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #787 12/24/08 -
Post by: wingnut on December 30, 2008, 03:47:06 PM
I have lurked at SM for over 3 years now, but am choosing now to post.  I first posted at CTV and then BFN, and lastly as a Freebird.  The Freebirds were formed for one purpose only: To work as advocates for Natalee Holloway and her family in an arena without distraction. 

My purpose in posting here today is to validate what Kermit has stated as TRUTH.

I would also like to say that my admiration for the monkeys is indescribable.  Our purpose is the same.  Justice.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #787 12/24/08 -
Post by: klaasend on December 30, 2008, 03:53:44 PM
Sent to me by Natalee's Freebirds:

Please feel free (if you'd like) to post this at your board.
 
During the journey of the Persistence to Aruba, Kyle reached out and emailed with us.  During that time, one of the questions posed to him was regarding protocol if/when Natalee's remains were found.
 
Kyle's response was that he was unsure, but felt that would be settled before the search began.
 
The cautions were given to him about the lack of integrity on the part of Aruba's law enforcement, prosecutor's office, and its judiciary.
 
Contact with Kyle continued throughout the duration of the search by the Persistence.
 
Once back home, Kyle asked us for our help.  He was very concerned about the activities that transpired during their search - specifically surrounding the find of the fishing cage and its contents.  Kyle wanted our help in presenting this information in a factual way, to then be given to Natalee's family. 
 
This was March 18, 2008.  At that time, Kyle assured us he had just recently sent the images from the Dec 30th and Jan 7th dives to the FBI, but had never received a response from them.
 
We later found that to be false.
 
Also at that time, Beth's brother saw the images Kyle had shared with us - but none of the detail he shared later.

We compiled the images Kyle presented us, along with his opinions and the facts surrounding the sequence of events regarding that fishing cage.  Kyle stated he would be getting in touch with Beth Holloway.
 
We later found out that never happened.

At this time, Kyle shared with us the broadcast networks he had approached in February, in an attempt to sell these images to the highest bidder.
 
This didn't concern us greatly at that time - as we were under the impression US law enforcement and Natalee's family had already been made aware of their find.
 
Approximately May 2008 Kyle began dodging questions for details (we had asked for names of Aruban police and divers to be included in our documentation of these events), hedging on moving forward with this, and then he completely disappeared from our board.
 
During that time, we learned Kyle had never contacted Beth, or Dave, or the FBI with this information.
 
We put our original plan into motion - that of presenting this information in a clear and concise manner, and we sent it to Beth Holloway.
 
Beth was disturbed, needed time to digest the information, and wanted to share it with someone she trusts.
 
When Tim Miller was returning to Aruba this past fall, Beth gave us permission to release this information publicly.
 
At that point, we gave it to John Kelly, Carmen Adams with the FBI, and got it ready for public consumption.
 
The next step was to publish this information at our blog.
 
One of our members felt we were betraying Kyle in doing so, contacted him, and he re-surfaced at our site with threats of litigation against us - stating this was his "intellectual property" and we could not use it.
 
That of course concerned us greatly - as none of us could afford to be sued.
 
He also stated at that time, Luis Shaefer had just recently sold the rights of the video of these images to a broadcast company for the purposes of a documentary.
 
We contacted legal counsel and were advised to keep our distance from any Persistence crew member, in the face of potential obstruction/accessory charges.
 
At this point, one of our members decided to brace for the possibility of civil litigation, resigned from our membership to protect it from same, and posted what he knows to be factual at SM.
 
Kyle did tell us human remains were found in that fish cage.
 
Kyle did tell us about John Silvetti's intent to open an office on the island of Aruba, to enable him ease in conducting business in South America, and Aruba.
 
Kyle also told us of John's absolute refusal to give that fish cage and its contents any credence - before even it was inspected on Jan 7th.
 
Kyle told us in no uncertain terms that Tim Miller and Dateline were abruptly removed from the Persistence on Dec 30, resulting in only Persistence crew being aboard between that date and the Jan 7 dive of the Arubans.
 
Nothing that was posted at SM by kermit was incorrect, out of context, or in any way false.
 
Regards,
 
Former Natalee's Freebirds Administrator
Natalee and her family deserve justice - and we will not let up until they have it!


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #787 12/24/08 -
Post by: klaasend on December 30, 2008, 03:55:00 PM
I have lurked at SM for over 3 years now, but am choosing now to post.  I first posted at CTV and then BFN, and lastly as a Freebird.  The Freebirds were formed for one purpose only: To work as advocates for Natalee Holloway and her family in an arena without distraction. 

My purpose in posting here today is to validate what Kermit has stated as TRUTH.

I would also like to say that my admiration for the monkeys is indescribable.  Our purpose is the same.  Justice.

Welcome Wingnut!


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #787 12/24/08 -
Post by: bastibro on December 30, 2008, 03:58:51 PM
I have lurked at SM for over 3 years now, but am choosing now to post.  I first posted at CTV and then BFN, and lastly as a Freebird.  The Freebirds were formed for one purpose only: To work as advocates for Natalee Holloway and her family in an arena without distraction. 

My purpose in posting here today is to validate what Kermit has stated as TRUTH.

I would also like to say that my admiration for the monkeys is indescribable.  Our purpose is the same.  Justice.

Thanks for letting us know Kermit was telling the truth.
Like she said:  It`s all going to come down . . we will be waiting patiently  ::MonkeyWink::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #787 12/24/08 -
Post by: Tamikosmom on December 30, 2008, 04:02:39 PM
If Natalee Holloway's remains were in that cage/trap ... it must be exposed.  Justice for an eighteen year old American and ... closure for her family demands it.

'Scarborough Country' for July 14
updated 8:45 a.m. PT, Fri., July. 15, 2005


JUG TWITTY, NATALEE HOLLOWAY'S STEPFATHER: Beth and I have been through this emotional roller coaster. And all we want is Natalee, whether she's alive or dead. We want to bring her back to the United States, and we'll leave and they can do whatever they want to do.

http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/8551824/

Janet

++++++++++
 
KYLE KINGMAN'S PERSPECTIVE ON THE CONTENTS OF THE CAGE/TRAP

Kyle: In case it isn't clear.. notice the blue denim-like fabric

Kyle: We all know it wasn't a blouse, but I believe they were sent some piece of fabric other than the fabric found inside the trap.

Kyle: The portion of the discolored blue fabric was presumably on the bottom of the fabric. In my opinion this discoloration is not another type of fabric, but rather biological staining or discoloration from biological growth caused from a high organic carbon content and decay. Basically, during decay a biological mat will form around the organics from remains. This is what I believe it is on the bottom of the fabric.

Kyle: It was confirmed by the FBI that they received a fabric sample send by Richardson and that it wasn't a match to Natalee's blouse. I think the video can prove or disprove whatever the FBI was sent was the same object or not. I strongly believe it's blue denim. Everyone I show thinks the same thing without being prompted (including senior ABC execs).

Kyle: Notice the end of the skirt is an identical match to the 90 degree angle in the sand. I believe her left arm was outstretched with her legs slightly bent. I did not edit the legs. I believe the tarp was placed over her and tucked around her, or perhaps tied down. I believe there are several rocks laying on the sand which were placed on the tarp, or inside the tarp over her body which explains their unusual location. Either way, the proportions appear promising.

Kyle: I took the proportions of the body form from the head, to shoulder, to a 90 degree angle which I believed to be the hem line of Natalee's skirt. I then took those proportions and matched them to the photo of Natalee with what she was last seen wearing. The proportions matched within an inch from head, to shoulder, to skirt line. Based on this comparison and with what we believed we saw in the Dec 29th video, Tim Miller contacted the family and told them the 99.9% comment. I told Tim not to do anything until we have forensic results back after the site is processed. Jan 7th we sampled the contents and in my opinion we found the skirt under the sand along with the other items The blue fabric was found right where the skirt is pictured. If it isn't her, it will forever haunt me as a major cosmic WTF.

_______


THE ROV IMAGES

Re: Natalee Case Discussion #778 11/23/08 -
« Reply #408 on: November 24, 2008, 03:59:08 PM »


http://scaredmonkeys.net/index.php?topic=4173.msg555618#msg555618
 
 
Re: Natalee Case Discussion #778 11/23/08 -
« Reply #410 on: November 24, 2008, 04:01:55 PM »


Photos given to the FBI sent to Dave and Robin posted on the internet are NOT the
photos posted above.  These were not given to the FBI until recently.

http://scaredmonkeys.net/index.php?topic=4173.msg555621#msg555621



Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #787 12/24/08 -
Post by: wingnut on December 30, 2008, 04:09:36 PM
Thank you for the warm welcome.  The truth is coming out.  I believe that Kyle's intentions were honorable at first, but his hands got tied.  Once his hands were tied, his focus shifted.

Instead of monkeys and birds eating each other, we need to concentrate on where the EVIDENCE is that was removed from the cage.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #787 12/24/08 -
Post by: texasmom on December 30, 2008, 04:10:27 PM
I have lurked at SM for over 3 years now, but am choosing now to post.  I first posted at CTV and then BFN, and lastly as a Freebird.  The Freebirds were formed for one purpose only: To work as advocates for Natalee Holloway and her family in an arena without distraction. 

My purpose in posting here today is to validate what Kermit has stated as TRUTH.

I would also like to say that my admiration for the monkeys is indescribable.  Our purpose is the same.  Justice.

Thank you very much wingnut!  I truly hope that together we can all find the answers and Justice for Natalee and her family.

 ::MonkeyCool::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #787 12/24/08 -
Post by: Tamikosmom on December 30, 2008, 04:10:35 PM
Sent to me by Natalee's Freebirds:

Please feel free (if you'd like) to post this at your board.
 
During the journey of the Persistence to Aruba, Kyle reached out and emailed with us.  During that time, one of the questions posed to him was regarding protocol if/when Natalee's remains were found.
 
Kyle's response was that he was unsure, but felt that would be settled before the search began.
 
The cautions were given to him about the lack of integrity on the part of Aruba's law enforcement, prosecutor's office, and its judiciary.
 
Contact with Kyle continued throughout the duration of the search by the Persistence.
 
Once back home, Kyle asked us for our help.  He was very concerned about the activities that transpired during their search - specifically surrounding the find of the fishing cage and its contents.  Kyle wanted our help in presenting this information in a factual way, to then be given to Natalee's family. 
 
This was March 18, 2008.  At that time, Kyle assured us he had just recently sent the images from the Dec 30th and Jan 7th dives to the FBI, but had never received a response from them.
 
We later found that to be false.
 
Also at that time, Beth's brother saw the images Kyle had shared with us - but none of the detail he shared later.

We compiled the images Kyle presented us, along with his opinions and the facts surrounding the sequence of events regarding that fishing cage.  Kyle stated he would be getting in touch with Beth Holloway.
 
We later found out that never happened.

At this time, Kyle shared with us the broadcast networks he had approached in February, in an attempt to sell these images to the highest bidder.
 
This didn't concern us greatly at that time - as we were under the impression US law enforcement and Natalee's family had already been made aware of their find.
 
Approximately May 2008 Kyle began dodging questions for details (we had asked for names of Aruban police and divers to be included in our documentation of these events), hedging on moving forward with this, and then he completely disappeared from our board.
 
During that time, we learned Kyle had never contacted Beth, or Dave, or the FBI with this information.
 
We put our original plan into motion - that of presenting this information in a clear and concise manner, and we sent it to Beth Holloway.
 
Beth was disturbed, needed time to digest the information, and wanted to share it with someone she trusts.
 
When Tim Miller was returning to Aruba this past fall, Beth gave us permission to release this information publicly.
 
At that point, we gave it to John Kelly, Carmen Adams with the FBI, and got it ready for public consumption.
 
The next step was to publish this information at our blog.
 
One of our members felt we were betraying Kyle in doing so, contacted him, and he re-surfaced at our site with threats of litigation against us - stating this was his "intellectual property" and we could not use it.
 
That of course concerned us greatly - as none of us could afford to be sued.
 
He also stated at that time, Luis Shaefer had just recently sold the rights of the video of these images to a broadcast company for the purposes of a documentary.
 
We contacted legal counsel and were advised to keep our distance from any Persistence crew member, in the face of potential obstruction/accessory charges.
 
At this point, one of our members decided to brace for the possibility of civil litigation, resigned from our membership to protect it from same, and posted what he knows to be factual at SM.
 
Kyle did tell us human remains were found in that fish cage.
 
Kyle did tell us about John Silvetti's intent to open an office on the island of Aruba, to enable him ease in conducting business in South America, and Aruba.
 
Kyle also told us of John's absolute refusal to give that fish cage and its contents any credence - before even it was inspected on Jan 7th.
 
Kyle told us in no uncertain terms that Tim Miller and Dateline were abruptly removed from the Persistence on Dec 30, resulting in only Persistence crew being aboard between that date and the Jan 7 dive of the Arubans.
 
Nothing that was posted at SM by kermit was incorrect, out of context, or in any way false.
 
Regards,
 
Former Natalee's Freebirds Administrator
Natalee and her family deserve justice - and we will not let up until they have it!


 ::MonkeyDance::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #787 12/24/08 -
Post by: texasmom on December 30, 2008, 04:19:29 PM
Sent to me by Natalee's Freebirds:

Please feel free (if you'd like) to post this at your board.
 
During the journey of the Persistence to Aruba, Kyle reached out and emailed with us.  During that time, one of the questions posed to him was regarding protocol if/when Natalee's remains were found.
 
Kyle's response was that he was unsure, but felt that would be settled before the search began.
 
The cautions were given to him about the lack of integrity on the part of Aruba's law enforcement, prosecutor's office, and its judiciary.
 
Contact with Kyle continued throughout the duration of the search by the Persistence.
 
Once back home, Kyle asked us for our help.  He was very concerned about the activities that transpired during their search - specifically surrounding the find of the fishing cage and its contents.  Kyle wanted our help in presenting this information in a factual way, to then be given to Natalee's family. 
 
This was March 18, 2008.  At that time, Kyle assured us he had just recently sent the images from the Dec 30th and Jan 7th dives to the FBI, but had never received a response from them.
 
We later found that to be false.
 
Also at that time, Beth's brother saw the images Kyle had shared with us - but none of the detail he shared later.

We compiled the images Kyle presented us, along with his opinions and the facts surrounding the sequence of events regarding that fishing cage.  Kyle stated he would be getting in touch with Beth Holloway.
 
We later found out that never happened.

At this time, Kyle shared with us the broadcast networks he had approached in February, in an attempt to sell these images to the highest bidder.
 
This didn't concern us greatly at that time - as we were under the impression US law enforcement and Natalee's family had already been made aware of their find.
 
Approximately May 2008 Kyle began dodging questions for details (we had asked for names of Aruban police and divers to be included in our documentation of these events), hedging on moving forward with this, and then he completely disappeared from our board.
 
During that time, we learned Kyle had never contacted Beth, or Dave, or the FBI with this information.
 
We put our original plan into motion - that of presenting this information in a clear and concise manner, and we sent it to Beth Holloway.
 
Beth was disturbed, needed time to digest the information, and wanted to share it with someone she trusts.
 
When Tim Miller was returning to Aruba this past fall, Beth gave us permission to release this information publicly.
 
At that point, we gave it to John Kelly, Carmen Adams with the FBI, and got it ready for public consumption.
 
The next step was to publish this information at our blog.
 
One of our members felt we were betraying Kyle in doing so, contacted him, and he re-surfaced at our site with threats of litigation against us - stating this was his "intellectual property" and we could not use it.
 
That of course concerned us greatly - as none of us could afford to be sued.
 
He also stated at that time, Luis Shaefer had just recently sold the rights of the video of these images to a broadcast company for the purposes of a documentary.
 
We contacted legal counsel and were advised to keep our distance from any Persistence crew member, in the face of potential obstruction/accessory charges.
 
At this point, one of our members decided to brace for the possibility of civil litigation, resigned from our membership to protect it from same, and posted what he knows to be factual at SM.
 
Kyle did tell us human remains were found in that fish cage.
 
Kyle did tell us about John Silvetti's intent to open an office on the island of Aruba, to enable him ease in conducting business in South America, and Aruba.
 
Kyle also told us of John's absolute refusal to give that fish cage and its contents any credence - before even it was inspected on Jan 7th.
 
Kyle told us in no uncertain terms that Tim Miller and Dateline were abruptly removed from the Persistence on Dec 30, resulting in only Persistence crew being aboard between that date and the Jan 7 dive of the Arubans.
 
Nothing that was posted at SM by kermit was incorrect, out of context, or in any way false.
 
Regards,
 
Former Natalee's Freebirds Administrator
Natalee and her family deserve justice - and we will not let up until they have it!


 ::MonkeyDance::  Thank you Klaas for posting this, and extreme gratitude to the author!  ::MonkeyCool::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #787 12/24/08 -
Post by: texasmom on December 30, 2008, 04:20:26 PM
Thank you for the warm welcome.  The truth is coming out.  I believe that Kyle's intentions were honorable at first, but his hands got tied.  Once his hands were tied, his focus shifted.

Instead of monkeys and birds eating each other, we need to concentrate on where the EVIDENCE is that was removed from the cage.

AMEN!


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #787 12/24/08 -
Post by: Tamikosmom on December 30, 2008, 04:21:43 PM
Thank you for the warm welcome.  The truth is coming out.  I believe that Kyle's intentions were honorable at first, but his hands got tied.  Once his hands were tied, his focus shifted.

Instead of monkeys and birds eating each other, we need to concentrate on where the EVIDENCE is that was removed from the cage.

wingnut

Using Kyle Kingman's own words in his posts to the Natalee's Freebirds which can be traced through IP number ...

1.  Is there no way the family and John Q. Kelly can put pressure on the "powers that be" in Aruba?

2.  Is there no way that the family can expose the Persistence hoax through media sources? 

Janet


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #787 12/24/08 -
Post by: Keepthefaith on December 30, 2008, 04:22:47 PM
Sent to me by Natalee's Freebirds:

Please feel free (if you'd like) to post this at your board.
 
During the journey of the Persistence to Aruba, Kyle reached out and emailed with us.  During that time, one of the questions posed to him was regarding protocol if/when Natalee's remains were found.
 
Kyle's response was that he was unsure, but felt that would be settled before the search began.
 
The cautions were given to him about the lack of integrity on the part of Aruba's law enforcement, prosecutor's office, and its judiciary.
 
Contact with Kyle continued throughout the duration of the search by the Persistence.
 
Once back home, Kyle asked us for our help.  He was very concerned about the activities that transpired during their search - specifically surrounding the find of the fishing cage and its contents.  Kyle wanted our help in presenting this information in a factual way, to then be given to Natalee's family. 
 
This was March 18, 2008.  At that time, Kyle assured us he had just recently sent the images from the Dec 30th and Jan 7th dives to the FBI, but had never received a response from them.
 
We later found that to be false.
 
Also at that time, Beth's brother saw the images Kyle had shared with us - but none of the detail he shared later.

We compiled the images Kyle presented us, along with his opinions and the facts surrounding the sequence of events regarding that fishing cage.  Kyle stated he would be getting in touch with Beth Holloway.
 
We later found out that never happened.

At this time, Kyle shared with us the broadcast networks he had approached in February, in an attempt to sell these images to the highest bidder.
 
This didn't concern us greatly at that time - as we were under the impression US law enforcement and Natalee's family had already been made aware of their find.
 
Approximately May 2008 Kyle began dodging questions for details (we had asked for names of Aruban police and divers to be included in our documentation of these events), hedging on moving forward with this, and then he completely disappeared from our board.
 
During that time, we learned Kyle had never contacted Beth, or Dave, or the FBI with this information.
 
We put our original plan into motion - that of presenting this information in a clear and concise manner, and we sent it to Beth Holloway.
 
Beth was disturbed, needed time to digest the information, and wanted to share it with someone she trusts.
 
When Tim Miller was returning to Aruba this past fall, Beth gave us permission to release this information publicly.
 
At that point, we gave it to John Kelly, Carmen Adams with the FBI, and got it ready for public consumption.
 
The next step was to publish this information at our blog.
 
One of our members felt we were betraying Kyle in doing so, contacted him, and he re-surfaced at our site with threats of litigation against us - stating this was his "intellectual property" and we could not use it.
 
That of course concerned us greatly - as none of us could afford to be sued.
 
He also stated at that time, Luis Shaefer had just recently sold the rights of the video of these images to a broadcast company for the purposes of a documentary.
 
We contacted legal counsel and were advised to keep our distance from any Persistence crew member, in the face of potential obstruction/accessory charges.
 
At this point, one of our members decided to brace for the possibility of civil litigation, resigned from our membership to protect it from same, and posted what he knows to be factual at SM.
 
Kyle did tell us human remains were found in that fish cage.
 
Kyle did tell us about John Silvetti's intent to open an office on the island of Aruba, to enable him ease in conducting business in South America, and Aruba.
 
Kyle also told us of John's absolute refusal to give that fish cage and its contents any credence - before even it was inspected on Jan 7th.
 
Kyle told us in no uncertain terms that Tim Miller and Dateline were abruptly removed from the Persistence on Dec 30, resulting in only Persistence crew being aboard between that date and the Jan 7 dive of the Arubans.
 
Nothing that was posted at SM by kermit was incorrect, out of context, or in any way false.
 
Regards,
 
Former Natalee's Freebirds Administrator
Natalee and her family deserve justice - and we will not let up until they have it!


 ::MonkeyDance::

I'm literally getting chills Janet.Thanx for the heads up! ::MonkeyDance::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #787 12/24/08 -
Post by: Keepthefaith on December 30, 2008, 04:24:38 PM
Thank You Wingnut! ::MonkeyDance:: ::MonkeyDance::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #787 12/24/08 -
Post by: Magnolia on December 30, 2008, 04:25:32 PM
I am very thankful to Wingnut and the Freebirds Adm. for letting
us know that what we have believed is true.

I am also thankful to Kermit for stearing us in the right direction.

Now I must wonder about others that have sent the monkeys on
wild goose chases and why.

I think Natalee's remains might possibably be in the morgue in
Aruba....still to this day.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #787 12/24/08 -
Post by: Tamikosmom on December 30, 2008, 04:28:37 PM
truthseeker

I would sincerely appreciate your perspective on this topic when the confirmation from the Freebird's former administrator is considered.  Has it changed?

Thank you.

Janet

++++++

I think the postings about Kyle have been too harsh.  He clearly expressed his concerns all along and provided tons of info that would never have been available otherwise.  I also agree that some of what he said may have been taken out of context.  It's easy to question everything he did in retrospect, but I think he did his best functioning in a complex situation and had good intentions.  Sometimes things are not black and white, and of course he has to protect himself and his livelihood and reputation.  I think it was a mistake to alienate him, and I don't think he owes it to SM to defend himself.  Sometimes you are placed in a situation where it's a no-win no matter what you do. And using his religious beliefs to try to get him to come back and explain seems cruel. 

Thank you!!  Well said.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #787 12/24/08 -
Post by: Tamikosmom on December 30, 2008, 04:30:50 PM
Hi Kermit.

I see ya lurking.

 ::MonkeyHaHa::

Janet


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #787 12/24/08 -
Post by: Magnolia on December 30, 2008, 04:31:23 PM
truthseeker

I would sincerely appreciate your perspective on this topic when the confirmation from the Freebird's former administrator is considered.  Has it changed?

Thank you.

Janet

++++++

I think the postings about Kyle have been too harsh.  He clearly expressed his concerns all along and provided tons of info that would never have been available otherwise.  I also agree that some of what he said may have been taken out of context.  It's easy to question everything he did in retrospect, but I think he did his best functioning in a complex situation and had good intentions.  Sometimes things are not black and white, and of course he has to protect himself and his livelihood and reputation.  I think it was a mistake to alienate him, and I don't think he owes it to SM to defend himself.  Sometimes you are placed in a situation where it's a no-win no matter what you do. And using his religious beliefs to try to get him to come back and explain seems cruel. 

Thank you!!  Well said.


Janet, is your blood boiling just a little bit?  Mine is.
I wish I could hug that frog.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #787 12/24/08 -
Post by: texasmom on December 30, 2008, 04:33:17 PM
Hi Kermit.

I see ya lurking.

 ::MonkeyHaHa::

Janet

  ::MonkeyDance::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #787 12/24/08 -
Post by: Kermit on December 30, 2008, 04:33:58 PM
ldstlou
Re: Natalee Case Discussion #787 12/24/08 -
« Reply #283 on: December 29, 2008, 10:20:17 PM »
I have real problem with Kermit.
/http://scaredmonkeys.net/index.php?topic=4269.280

Idstlou,
I am not going to do things or say things that have any agenda other then to expose the truth.
I am sorry you choose to interpret what you are told differently, but I do not. I have not taken
anything out of context. I have not violated any agreements. I HAVE given information of a crime
and cover-up to the appropriate individuals.
I will not belabor your opinion of me.




Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #787 12/24/08 -
Post by: Tamikosmom on December 30, 2008, 04:34:45 PM

Janet, is your blood boiling just a little bit?  Mine is.
I wish I could hug that frog.


This religious fanatical Monkey is praising God ... dancing in the aisles and ... she is not even Charasmatic.

 ::cartwheel::

The affirmation from the former administrator of the Natalee's Freebirds has the ability to bring the Natalee's Monkeys back together in the same cage in regards to this topic.

Janet







Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #787 12/24/08 -
Post by: Kermit on December 30, 2008, 04:34:48 PM
Hi Kermit.

I see ya lurking.

 ::MonkeyHaHa::

Janet

Hello Ms. Janet.
It's colder then a frogs tit where I am.




Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #787 12/24/08 -
Post by: Kermit on December 30, 2008, 04:36:11 PM
(http://img83.imageshack.us/img83/7725/kermitwantedch5.jpg)


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #787 12/24/08 -
Post by: Keepthefaith on December 30, 2008, 04:36:39 PM

Janet, is your blood boiling just a little bit?  Mine is.
I wish I could hug that frog.


This religious fanatical Monkey is praising God ... dancing in the aisles and ... she is not even Charasmatic.

 ::cartwheel::

The affirmation from the former administrator of the Natalee's Freebirds has the ability to bring the Natalee's Monkeys back together in the same cage in regards to this topic.

Janet







The Fraser Valley better brace itself... ::MonkeyDance::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #787 12/24/08 -
Post by: Keepthefaith on December 30, 2008, 04:38:22 PM
Hi Kermit.

I see ya lurking.

 ::MonkeyHaHa::

Janet

Hello Ms. Janet.
It's colder then a frogs tit where I am.

Again.Thank you Kermit.. ::MonkeyDance:: The snow is melting away up here in Seattle..... ::MonkeyDance::







Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #787 12/24/08 -
Post by: Keepthefaith on December 30, 2008, 04:39:20 PM
Has your mind changed Truthseeker2???


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #787 12/24/08 -
Post by: texasmom on December 30, 2008, 04:39:50 PM

Janet, is your blood boiling just a little bit?  Mine is.
I wish I could hug that frog.


This religious fanatical Monkey is praising God ... dancing in the aisles and ... she is not even Charasmatic.

 ::cartwheel::

The affirmation from the former administrator of the Natalee's Freebirds has the ability to bring the Natalee's Monkeys back together in the same cage in regards to this topic.

Janet


I agree Janet, and I can't help but feel that there's a precious monkey in heaven working some magic!!!!   ::MonkeyDance:: ::MonkeyDance:: ::MonkeyDance::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #787 12/24/08 -
Post by: Kermit on December 30, 2008, 04:39:58 PM


Janet, is your blood boiling just a little bit?  Mine is.
I wish I could hug that frog.

 :smt008


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #787 12/24/08 -
Post by: Keepthefaith on December 30, 2008, 04:41:13 PM


Janet, is your blood boiling just a little bit?  Mine is.
I wish I could hug that frog.

 :smt008

I feel Miss Piggy's wrath coming on if you try to flirt with the Frog Magnolia.. ::MonkeyDance::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #787 12/24/08 -
Post by: Tamikosmom on December 30, 2008, 04:41:42 PM
Hi Kermit.

I see ya lurking.

 ::MonkeyHaHa::

Janet

Hello Ms. Janet.
It's colder then a frogs tit where I am.



 ::MonkeyShocked::

I am not sure how cold that is but ... it is very cold here.

However ... Mr. Tamikosmom has dug a new pond in the back of the property to allow for drainage and ... it is heated and outlined with little Japanese lanterns ... waiting to accompany you and Miss Piggy.

Hugs

Janet


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #787 12/24/08 -
Post by: crazybabyborg on December 30, 2008, 04:41:50 PM
(http://img83.imageshack.us/img83/7725/kermitwantedch5.jpg)


Good Day, Kermit! I mean it. It's a good Day!  ::MonkeyWink::

Thank You for being such a thick "hided" frog.

Thank YOU Klaas, for posting the letter!!!


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #787 12/24/08 -
Post by: hotping on December 30, 2008, 04:42:11 PM

Janet, is your blood boiling just a little bit?  Mine is.
I wish I could hug that frog.


This religious fanatical Monkey is praising God ... dancing in the aisles and ... she is not even Charasmatic.

 ::cartwheel::

The affirmation from the former administrator of the Natalee's Freebirds has the ability to bring the Natalee's Monkeys back together in the same cage in regards to this topic.

Janet


I agree Janet, and I can't help but feel that there's a precious monkey in heaven working some magic!!!!   ::MonkeyDance:: ::MonkeyDance:: ::MonkeyDance::
I totally agree TM.....Thank You Precious Peaches!  ::MonkeyWink::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #787 12/24/08 -
Post by: texasmom on December 30, 2008, 04:42:27 PM
(http://img83.imageshack.us/img83/7725/kermitwantedch5.jpg)


 ::MonkeyHaHa:: ::MonkeyDance:: ::cartwheel:: ::MonkeyHaHa::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #787 12/24/08 -
Post by: Tamikosmom on December 30, 2008, 04:43:57 PM

Janet, is your blood boiling just a little bit?  Mine is.
I wish I could hug that frog.


This religious fanatical Monkey is praising God ... dancing in the aisles and ... she is not even Charasmatic.

 ::cartwheel::

The affirmation from the former administrator of the Natalee's Freebirds has the ability to bring the Natalee's Monkeys back together in the same cage in regards to this topic.

Janet


I agree Janet, and I can't help but feel that there's a precious monkey in heaven working some magic!!!!   ::MonkeyDance:: ::MonkeyDance:: ::MonkeyDance::

I am sure there is texasmom.

:smt008

Janet


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #787 12/24/08 -
Post by: Keepthefaith on December 30, 2008, 04:44:38 PM
Hi Kermit.

I see ya lurking.

 ::MonkeyHaHa::

Janet

Hello Ms. Janet.
It's colder then a frogs tit where I am.



 ::MonkeyShocked::

I am not sure how cold that is but ... it is very cold here.

However ... Mr. Tamikosmom has dug a new pond in the back of the property to allow for drainage and ... it is heated and outlined with little Japanese lanterns ... waiting to accompany you and Miss Piggy.

Hugs

Janet

You better start cultivating the Fly farm for Kermit. ::MonkeyDance::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #787 12/24/08 -
Post by: Kermit on December 30, 2008, 04:44:47 PM
Quote
ldstlou
Re: Natalee Case Discussion #787 12/24/08 -
« Reply #290 on: December 29, 2008, 10:29:03 PM »
Two...Kyle had a confidentiality agreement with the ship he was on...the Persitence...which is standard, and one with the Freebirds which Kermit agreed to when she joined. Is his career affected by what Kermit did? Absolutely!!! Did he try and cover up the finding of Natalee? No!!

http://scaredmonkeys.net/index.php?topic=4269.280

May I remind you of Kyle's actions regarding his career!

From Kyle: May 8, 2008: "I've talked with Peter Shouten numerous times back in February. He hasn't seen anything but knows about the blue fabrics. DeVries and Endemol was interested in purchasing the ROV footage and I was working between them, ABC, and CBS to strike a deal."








Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #787 12/24/08 -
Post by: Kermit on December 30, 2008, 04:45:38 PM
Hi Kermit.

I see ya lurking.

 ::MonkeyHaHa::

Janet

Hello Ms. Janet.
It's colder then a frogs tit where I am.



 ::MonkeyShocked::

I am not sure how cold that is but ... it is very cold here.

However ... Mr. Tamikosmom has dug a new pond in the back of the property to allow for drainage and ... it is heated and outlined with little Japanese lanterns ... waiting to accompany you and Miss Piggy.

Hugs

Janet

You better start cultivating the Fly farm for Kermit. ::MonkeyDance::

LOL



Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #787 12/24/08 -
Post by: hotping on December 30, 2008, 04:46:14 PM
Hi Kermit.

I see ya lurking.

 ::MonkeyHaHa::

Janet

Hello Ms. Janet.
It's colder then a frogs tit where I am.



Hey Kermit its 70 Degrees in South Central Texas hop on down for some warmth and Margaritas..... ::MonkeyDance::  ::cartwheel::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #787 12/24/08 -
Post by: Kermit on December 30, 2008, 04:47:19 PM
Hi Kermit.

I see ya lurking.

 ::MonkeyHaHa::

Janet

Hello Ms. Janet.
It's colder then a frogs tit where I am.



 ::MonkeyShocked::

I am not sure how cold that is but ... it is very cold here.

However ... Mr. Tamikosmom has dug a new pond in the back of the property to allow for drainage and ... it is heated and outlined with little Japanese lanterns ... waiting to accompany you and Miss Piggy.

Hugs

Janet

I'm texting Miss Piggy now, we have a place to din and drain in.



Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #787 12/24/08 -
Post by: hotping on December 30, 2008, 04:48:27 PM
Thank You Klaas for posting the letter from the Freebirds Former Administrator....  ::MonkeyCool::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #787 12/24/08 -
Post by: Kermit on December 30, 2008, 04:48:43 PM
Hi Kermit.

I see ya lurking.

 ::MonkeyHaHa::

Janet

Hello Ms. Janet.
It's colder then a frogs tit where I am.



Hey Kermit its 70 Degrees in South Central Texas hop on down for some warmth and Margaritas..... ::MonkeyDance::  ::cartwheel::

I lurv Texas!
I lurv that restaurant called Panchos! Best Mexican food ever!


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #787 12/24/08 -
Post by: Keepthefaith on December 30, 2008, 04:49:46 PM
Kermit,Janet,anyone!Do we know if Silvetti is still working with Tim M. or was that just hearsay about them continuing to work together??Be curious as to Tim's feeling's..


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #787 12/24/08 -
Post by: crazybabyborg on December 30, 2008, 04:50:47 PM

Janet, is your blood boiling just a little bit?  Mine is.
I wish I could hug that frog.


This religious fanatical Monkey is praising God ... dancing in the aisles and ... she is not even Charasmatic.

 ::cartwheel::

The affirmation from the former administrator of the Natalee's Freebirds has the ability to bring the Natalee's Monkeys back together in the same cage in regards to this topic.

Janet


I agree Janet, and I can't help but feel that there's a precious monkey in heaven working some magic!!!!   ::MonkeyDance:: ::MonkeyDance:: ::MonkeyDance::

I've been teary all day at the drop of a hat. Yes, I think that Peaches may have nudged things along a little, call me crazy, but I do. I know that when I came across this last night while reading her posts, I felt it was something I was supposed to find and share with you guys for her. She said she wanted to save it to use again next year, and I think she would want me to post it so that she can say to us once more..................


                                         (http://i25.photobucket.com/albums/c100/crazybabyborgs/Valentine%20Avatar/animated-candy-box.gif)


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #787 12/24/08 -
Post by: Tamikosmom on December 30, 2008, 04:52:13 PM

I'm literally getting chills Janet.Thanx for the heads up! ::MonkeyDance::

Keepthefaith

The Natalee Holloway Monkeys were rejoicing but ... you were missing.

 ::MonkeyWaa::

I knew the room of the cage where you could be located sooo ... I being banned for an OFF TOPIC post.

 ::MonkeyHaHa::

Janet



Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #787 12/24/08 -
Post by: truthseeker2 on December 30, 2008, 04:52:33 PM
truthseeker

I would sincerely appreciate your perspective on this topic when the confirmation from the Freebird's former administrator is considered.  Has it changed?

Thank you.

Janet

++++++

I think the postings about Kyle have been too harsh.  He clearly expressed his concerns all along and provided tons of info that would never have been available otherwise.  I also agree that some of what he said may have been taken out of context.  It's easy to question everything he did in retrospect, but I think he did his best functioning in a complex situation and had good intentions.  Sometimes things are not black and white, and of course he has to protect himself and his livelihood and reputation.  I think it was a mistake to alienate him, and I don't think he owes it to SM to defend himself.  Sometimes you are placed in a situation where it's a no-win no matter what you do. And using his religious beliefs to try to get him to come back and explain seems cruel. 

Thank you!!  Well said.


No, Janet, it hasn't.  We still have no idea what was in that trap.  That has been my perspective from the very beginning.  That has not changed.  The idea that I like coming to SM to see the same thing posted over and over and over has not changed either.  I have the same goal as every other person who posts at this site.  I just do not get the same level respect.  And...heaven forbid you decide to make me your next target. Why...I shake in my boots.  But, I guess that is the type of thing that makes it all go 'round for some.

Me, as I have stated before, I am an analyst...and a damn good one.  I still do not see any facts indicating there were human remains in that trap.  Are we to assume that as fact because Kyle says so?  From what I can tell from most of the posts here lately...he is not to be believed.  Which is it?  Is he trutworthy or not?  So for me, until it is proven that human remains were found and that those human remains were Natalee's I will keep looking for answers.

Also, as an analyst, I fully understand contract work and the use/non-use of intellectual property.  Kyle may have disseminated that information within violation of a contract, and therefore his azz would be on the line.  If he is wrong, and he may be wrong, he may never be able to work again in his current capacity.  For whatever reason, he chose to do what he did.  I was not there, so I cannot and do not judge his actions. 

I accept the information regading the contents of the trap for what it is...his opinion...nothing more.  Calling him out on a forum day in and day out has not changed any of the known facts about Natalee.  It's all supposition.  I hope that someone has the where with all to get to the bottom of it, like our FBI.  But, they have had this information for a while now and we have not heard a word from them as to any future investigation.  We are only hearing a request for further investigations from the Netherlands.

And I also agree with whoever posted last night....trying to appeal to someone's faith is a personal thing...people can do that in open forums if they like.  It's not something I would do.

Back to lurking and researching......


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #787 12/24/08 -
Post by: hotping on December 30, 2008, 04:53:43 PM
Hi Kermit.

I see ya lurking.

 ::MonkeyHaHa::

Janet

Hello Ms. Janet.
It's colder then a frogs tit where I am.



Hey Kermit its 70 Degrees in South Central Texas hop on down for some warmth and Margaritas..... ::MonkeyDance::  ::cartwheel::

I lurv Texas!
I lurv that restaurant called Panchos! Best Mexican food ever!

Yep Texas is The Place For Great Mexican Food and Lots of Other Stuff Too!  ::MonkeyWink:: Thanks Kermit for All You Do for Natalee!  ::MonkeyCool:: 


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #787 12/24/08 -
Post by: Tamikosmom on December 30, 2008, 04:56:04 PM
Hi Kermit.

I see ya lurking.

 ::MonkeyHaHa::

Janet

Hello Ms. Janet.
It's colder then a frogs tit where I am.



 ::MonkeyShocked::

I am not sure how cold that is but ... it is very cold here.

However ... Mr. Tamikosmom has dug a new pond in the back of the property to allow for drainage and ... it is heated and outlined with little Japanese lanterns ... waiting to accompany you and Miss Piggy.

Hugs

Janet

I'm texting Miss Piggy now, we have a place to din and drain in.



Hubby is at the moment making sushi rolls (norimaki) for an outing tonight and ... if I am really nice and ... I am capable of being really nice ... he may just make some extra for his wife's special guests.

 ::cartwheel::

Janet


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #787 12/24/08 -
Post by: Kermit on December 30, 2008, 04:59:47 PM
You know what I feel bad about?  I feel bad that Dave and Beth have had to get phone calls from a million different people over the last nearly 4 years.

I don't know who is right or who is wrong in this issue with the trap.  All I know is Joran van der Sloot and the Kalpoe brothers were supposed to take Natalee back to the Holiday Inn on May 30, 2005 and they didn't.  They did something to her and she's gone.  They are responsible along with others.

After all this time, I have a real hard time with anyone telling us what to or not to post about in this forum.

HOTSHOT - how do you know you are right?

KERMIT - how do you know you are right?


Reminds me of the old days and SandraK telling us not to talk about her "baby".



That is an excellent question.
The reason I know I am right is because I was involved with more then just the Freebirds.
Keeping in the context in which it was, Kyle was on SM, he was on BFN, he then came to the Freebirds to be on there. I had, let's call it, insight into a LOT of things going on.








Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #787 12/24/08 -
Post by: Keepthefaith on December 30, 2008, 05:00:25 PM
Isn't that the point......Truthseeker2  "We still have no idea what was in that trap."


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #787 12/24/08 -
Post by: wingnut on December 30, 2008, 05:00:48 PM
Thank you for the warm welcome.  The truth is coming out.  I believe that Kyle's intentions were honorable at first, but his hands got tied.  Once his hands were tied, his focus shifted.

Instead of monkeys and birds eating each other, we need to concentrate on where the EVIDENCE is that was removed from the cage.

wingnut

Using Kyle Kingman's own words in his posts to the Natalee's Freebirds which can be traced through IP number ...

1.  Is there no way the family and John Q. Kelly can put pressure on the "powers that be" in Aruba?

2.  Is there no way that the family can expose the Persistence hoax through media sources? 

Janet


Hello Janet. 

I wish I had the answers.  I know that JQK has the information now.  I personally provided it to him. 


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #787 12/24/08 -
Post by: Tamikosmom on December 30, 2008, 05:00:59 PM
truthseeker

I would sincerely appreciate your perspective on this topic when the confirmation from the Freebird's former administrator is considered.  Has it changed?

Thank you.

Janet

++++++

I think the postings about Kyle have been too harsh.  He clearly expressed his concerns all along and provided tons of info that would never have been available otherwise.  I also agree that some of what he said may have been taken out of context.  It's easy to question everything he did in retrospect, but I think he did his best functioning in a complex situation and had good intentions.  Sometimes things are not black and white, and of course he has to protect himself and his livelihood and reputation.  I think it was a mistake to alienate him, and I don't think he owes it to SM to defend himself.  Sometimes you are placed in a situation where it's a no-win no matter what you do. And using his religious beliefs to try to get him to come back and explain seems cruel. 

Thank you!!  Well said.


No, Janet, it hasn't.  We still have no idea what was in that trap.  That has been my perspective from the very beginning.  That has not changed.  The idea that I like coming to SM to see the same thing posted over and over and over has not changed either.  I have the same goal as every other person who posts at this site.  I just do not get the same level respect.  And...heaven forbid you decide to make me your next target. Why...I shake in my boots.  But, I guess that is the type of thing that makes it all go 'round for some.

Me, as I have stated before, I am an analyst...and a damn good one.  I still do not see any facts indicating there were human remains in that trap.  Are we to assume that as fact because Kyle says so?  From what I can tell from most of the posts here lately...he is not to be believed.  Which is it?  Is he trutworthy or not?  So for me, until it is proven that human remains were found and that those human remains were Natalee's I will keep looking for answers.

Also, as an analyst, I fully understand contract work and the use/non-use of intellectual property.  Kyle may have disseminated that information within violation of a contract, and therefore his azz would be on the line.  If he is wrong, and he may be wrong, he may never be able to work again in his current capacity.  For whatever reason, he chose to do what he did.  I was not there, so I cannot and do not judge his actions. 

I accept the information regading the contents of the trap for what it is...his opinion...nothing more.  Calling him out on a forum day in and day out has not changed any of the known facts about Natalee.  It's all supposition.  I hope that someone has the where with all to get to the bottom of it, like our FBI.  But, they have had this information for a while now and we have not heard a word from them as to any future investigation.  We are only hearing a request for further investigations from the Netherlands.

And I also agree with whoever posted last night....trying to appeal to someone's faith is a personal thing...people can do that in open forums if they like.  It's not something I would do.

Back to lurking and researching......

truthseeker

Thank you for your response and ... I mean it.

Janet


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #787 12/24/08 -
Post by: Kermit on December 30, 2008, 05:04:43 PM
truthseeker

I would sincerely appreciate your perspective on this topic when the confirmation from the Freebird's former administrator is considered.  Has it changed?

Thank you.

Janet

++++++

I think the postings about Kyle have been too harsh.  He clearly expressed his concerns all along and provided tons of info that would never have been available otherwise.  I also agree that some of what he said may have been taken out of context.  It's easy to question everything he did in retrospect, but I think he did his best functioning in a complex situation and had good intentions.  Sometimes things are not black and white, and of course he has to protect himself and his livelihood and reputation.  I think it was a mistake to alienate him, and I don't think he owes it to SM to defend himself.  Sometimes you are placed in a situation where it's a no-win no matter what you do. And using his religious beliefs to try to get him to come back and explain seems cruel. 

Thank you!!  Well said.


No, Janet, it hasn't.  We still have no idea what was in that trap.  That has been my perspective from the very beginning.  That has not changed.  The idea that I like coming to SM to see the same thing posted over and over and over has not changed either.  I have the same goal as every other person who posts at this site.  I just do not get the same level respect.  And...heaven forbid you decide to make me your next target. Why...I shake in my boots.  But, I guess that is the type of thing that makes it all go 'round for some.

Me, as I have stated before, I am an analyst...and a damn good one.  I still do not see any facts indicating there were human remains in that trap.  Are we to assume that as fact because Kyle says so?  From what I can tell from most of the posts here lately...he is not to be believed.  Which is it?  Is he trutworthy or not?  So for me, until it is proven that human remains were found and that those human remains were Natalee's I will keep looking for answers.

Also, as an analyst, I fully understand contract work and the use/non-use of intellectual property.  Kyle may have disseminated that information within violation of a contract, and therefore his azz would be on the line.  If he is wrong, and he may be wrong, he may never be able to work again in his current capacity.  For whatever reason, he chose to do what he did.  I was not there, so I cannot and do not judge his actions. 

I accept the information regading the contents of the trap for what it is...his opinion...nothing more.  Calling him out on a forum day in and day out has not changed any of the known facts about Natalee.  It's all supposition.  I hope that someone has the where with all to get to the bottom of it, like our FBI.  But, they have had this information for a while now and we have not heard a word from them as to any future investigation.  We are only hearing a request for further investigations from the Netherlands.

And I also agree with whoever posted last night....trying to appeal to someone's faith is a personal thing...people can do that in open forums if they like.  It's not something I would do.

Back to lurking and researching......

I'm not answering for Janet,

But I just wanted to give you my own opinion.
Kyle said it was remains and considering he is the geophysicist who knows how to interpret the information he sees, then I tended to believe him. In addition, I didn't think it was highly likely that he'd be trying to sell the ROV footage to producers if it was a sponge or rock.

Also, I believe, that Tim Miller has seen enough skulls to be able to differentiate real from fake. I think he saw what he says he saw.

And why would only Aruban divers sweep in, collect the material fromt he trap if it was not important. Why dive and spend money to collect a sponge or rock?







Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #787 12/24/08 -
Post by: Kermit on December 30, 2008, 05:07:41 PM
Hi Kermit.

I see ya lurking.

 ::MonkeyHaHa::

Janet

Hello Ms. Janet.
It's colder then a frogs tit where I am.



Hey Kermit its 70 Degrees in South Central Texas hop on down for some warmth and Margaritas..... ::MonkeyDance::  ::cartwheel::

I lurv Texas!
I lurv that restaurant called Panchos! Best Mexican food ever!

Yep Texas is The Place For Great Mexican Food and Lots of Other Stuff Too!  ::MonkeyWink:: Thanks Kermit for All You Do for Natalee!  ::MonkeyCool:: 

Thank you for thanking me, but I honestly thank all the people who help and have given so freely, so willingly, so deeply all in the name of a little girl named: NATALEE HOLLOWAY

WE STAND UNITED - TOGETHER





Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #787 12/24/08 -
Post by: bastibro on December 30, 2008, 05:09:40 PM
truthseeker

I would sincerely appreciate your perspective on this topic when the confirmation from the Freebird's former administrator is considered.  Has it changed?

Thank you.

Janet

++++++

I think the postings about Kyle have been too harsh.  He clearly expressed his concerns all along and provided tons of info that would never have been available otherwise.  I also agree that some of what he said may have been taken out of context.  It's easy to question everything he did in retrospect, but I think he did his best functioning in a complex situation and had good intentions.  Sometimes things are not black and white, and of course he has to protect himself and his livelihood and reputation.  I think it was a mistake to alienate him, and I don't think he owes it to SM to defend himself.  Sometimes you are placed in a situation where it's a no-win no matter what you do. And using his religious beliefs to try to get him to come back and explain seems cruel. 

Thank you!!  Well said.


No, Janet, it hasn't.  We still have no idea what was in that trap.  That has been my perspective from the very beginning.  That has not changed.  The idea that I like coming to SM to see the same thing posted over and over and over has not changed either.  I have the same goal as every other person who posts at this site.  I just do not get the same level respect.  And...heaven forbid you decide to make me your next target. Why...I shake in my boots.  But, I guess that is the type of thing that makes it all go 'round for some.

Me, as I have stated before, I am an analyst...and a damn good one.  I still do not see any facts indicating there were human remains in that trap.  Are we to assume that as fact because Kyle says so?  From what I can tell from most of the posts here lately...he is not to be believed.  Which is it?  Is he trutworthy or not?  So for me, until it is proven that human remains were found and that those human remains were Natalee's I will keep looking for answers.

Also, as an analyst, I fully understand contract work and the use/non-use of intellectual property.  Kyle may have disseminated that information within violation of a contract, and therefore his azz would be on the line.  If he is wrong, and he may be wrong, he may never be able to work again in his current capacity.  For whatever reason, he chose to do what he did.  I was not there, so I cannot and do not judge his actions. 

I accept the information regading the contents of the trap for what it is...his opinion...nothing more.  Calling him out on a forum day in and day out has not changed any of the known facts about Natalee.  It's all supposition.  I hope that someone has the where with all to get to the bottom of it, like our FBI.  But, they have had this information for a while now and we have not heard a word from them as to any future investigation.  We are only hearing a request for further investigations from the Netherlands.

And I also agree with whoever posted last night....trying to appeal to someone's faith is a personal thing...people can do that in open forums if they like.  It's not something I would do.

Back to lurking and researching......

I a 98% agree !! 

However it`s my opinion to that this ARE human remains(not the thing that looked like a skull)

(http://i272.photobucket.com/albums/jj176/bastibro/verwant/hip_socket.jpg)


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #787 12/24/08 -
Post by: Keepthefaith on December 30, 2008, 05:10:19 PM
Isn't that the point......Truthseeker2  "We still have no idea what was in that trap."
[/quote

Bump


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #787 12/24/08 -
Post by: Kermit on December 30, 2008, 05:10:26 PM
Thank you for the warm welcome.  The truth is coming out.  I believe that Kyle's intentions were honorable at first, but his hands got tied.  Once his hands were tied, his focus shifted.

Instead of monkeys and birds eating each other, we need to concentrate on where the EVIDENCE is that was removed from the cage.

wingnut

Using Kyle Kingman's own words in his posts to the Natalee's Freebirds which can be traced through IP number ...

1.  Is there no way the family and John Q. Kelly can put pressure on the "powers that be" in Aruba?

2.  Is there no way that the family can expose the Persistence hoax through media sources? 

Janet


Hello Janet. 

I wish I had the answers.  I know that JQK has the information now.  I personally provided it to him. 



Hi Wingnut.

That was a fun day - I was talking to Scott and you were talking to John Q. Kelly!

You are my hero!





Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #787 12/24/08 -
Post by: Tamikosmom on December 30, 2008, 05:10:27 PM
Kermit,Janet,anyone!Do we know if Silvetti is still working with Tim M. or was that just hearsay about them continuing to work together??Be curious as to Tim's feeling's..

I do believe that Tim Miller and John Silvetti may very well have a connection to some capacity within the TES organization but ... I also believe that Tim Miller does not have clue that he was deceived when his suspicions regarding remains in the trap/cage were negated.

IMO ... Tim Miller has a heart of gold.  However ... in regards to relationships ... he is too trusting.  I believe that we were blessed with a heart and mind and ... together discernment can be arrived at.

Janet

++++


http://www.texasequusearch.org/

Tim Miller and John Silvetti from the Silvetti Group out of Louisiana, will be in Yankeetown, Florida to search for the two men missing since their plane lost radar contact with officials. Darien Peckham and Zachary Schlitt were headed to Vandenberg Airport, Tampa, Florida and never reached their destination. We will post more details regarding this search at a later date.




Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #787 12/24/08 -
Post by: Kermit on December 30, 2008, 05:12:10 PM
Peaches is in every Monkeys heart - forever


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #787 12/24/08 -
Post by: ldstlou on December 30, 2008, 05:12:45 PM
ldstlou
Re: Natalee Case Discussion #787 12/24/08 -
« Reply #283 on: December 29, 2008, 10:20:17 PM »
I have real problem with Kermit.
/http://scaredmonkeys.net/index.php?topic=4269.280

Idstlou,
I am not going to do things or say things that have any agenda other then to expose the truth.
I am sorry you choose to interpret what you are told differently, but I do not. I have not taken
anything out of context. I have not violated any agreements. I HAVE given information of a crime
and cover-up to the appropriate individuals.
I will not belabor your opinion of me.




I just keep going back to your post about how you "single handily" uncovered the cover-up or something to that affect.  ::MonkeyNoNo:: Sounds like a bit of an ego trip to me...at the  expense of others.
I have no idea who the "former admin" is. Don't know either if the "former admin" is still a Freebird or a disgruntled ex-Freebird. I am under the impression that you did agree to confidentiality in regards to what was spoken on the Freebird's board...and if that is true...you DID break a confidentiality agreement.
I forwarded the post by the "former admin" to Kyle and Jug...I will wait for their response thank you.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #787 12/24/08 -
Post by: klaasend on December 30, 2008, 05:13:23 PM
Kermit,Janet,anyone!Do we know if Silvetti is still working with Tim M. or was that just hearsay about them continuing to work together??Be curious as to Tim's feeling's..

Not sure.  It was reported that Silvetti was helping TES with a search I think in Louisiana.  That was about a month or so ago.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #787 12/24/08 -
Post by: Kermit on December 30, 2008, 05:13:50 PM
IMO ... Tim Miller has a heart of gold.  However ... in regards to relationships ... he is too trusting.  I believe that we were blessed with a heart and mind and ... together discernment can be arrived at.

Janet

++++


I completely agree with you Janet.




Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #787 12/24/08 -
Post by: Buckeye on December 30, 2008, 05:14:05 PM
Thanks to:
wingnut and Freebird Admin.

I don't know a lot about the law....but....pictures and video can be intellectual property....but the remains of a person and a crime scene rises to another level....just because a meter reader finds a body, does not mean he owns the rights to the crime scene...even if he used special equipment to locate the scene...the finder does not own the remains....Aruba (not the Persistence) might have ownership over the findings, in their waters...but we are not talking treasure...we are talking about a person...much different..IMO


O/T

I had read about L. Schaeffer and the history of the "adventure" company, he purchased out of bankruptcy.  I believe the goal was to sell "adventure" charters to look for things like sunken treasure, etc.  I could see a side "business" mapping shipwrecks, etc. to sell adventurer tours.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #787 12/24/08 -
Post by: texasmom on December 30, 2008, 05:15:01 PM
Hi Kermit.

I see ya lurking.

 ::MonkeyHaHa::

Janet

Hello Ms. Janet.
It's colder then a frogs tit where I am.



Hey Kermit its 70 Degrees in South Central Texas hop on down for some warmth and Margaritas..... ::MonkeyDance::  ::cartwheel::

I lurv Texas!
I lurv that restaurant called Panchos! Best Mexican food ever!


 ::MonkeyWink::

(http://i21.photobucket.com/albums/b258/texasmom55/KERMIT/K17.jpg)


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #787 12/24/08 -
Post by: Keepthefaith on December 30, 2008, 05:23:28 PM
ldstlou.If Jug & Kyle are aware of all of this why bother them with what they already know?Is this strictly about the Confidentiality Agreement?You seem to have a vested  interest in the disemination of the information!Correct me if i'm wrong.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #787 12/24/08 -
Post by: Tamikosmom on December 30, 2008, 05:23:50 PM
Well ... if I value my 43 year marriage and ... I do ... I must attend to life outside the computer room.

Thanks you wingnut and the "former administrator of the Natalee's Freebirds" for confirming the truth encompassing all that Kermit has shared regarding the Persistence hoax ... a hoax that was a betrayal to Natalee Holloway ... a hoax that was a betrayal to her long-suffering family and ... a hoax that was a betrayal to those who sacrificially donated to the undertaking.

Kermit ... an extra big hug for doing what was right in spite of the opposition ... doing what was right in the cause of justice for Natalee Holloway ... a cause that you have supported through your time and research since the getgo.

Thanks again to all.

Later, Monkeys

Janet
2:25 PM PT


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #787 12/24/08 -
Post by: Kermit on December 30, 2008, 05:26:14 PM
ldstlou
Re: Natalee Case Discussion #787 12/24/08 -
« Reply #283 on: December 29, 2008, 10:20:17 PM »
I have real problem with Kermit.
/http://scaredmonkeys.net/index.php?topic=4269.280

Idstlou,
I am not going to do things or say things that have any agenda other then to expose the truth.
I am sorry you choose to interpret what you are told differently, but I do not. I have not taken
anything out of context. I have not violated any agreements. I HAVE given information of a crime
and cover-up to the appropriate individuals.
I will not belabor your opinion of me.




I just keep going back to your post about how you "single handily" uncovered the cover-up or something to that affect.  ::MonkeyNoNo:: Sounds like a bit of an ego trip to me...at the  expense of others.
I have no idea who the "former admin" is. Don't know either if the "former admin" is still a Freebird or a disgruntled ex-Freebird. I am under the impression that you did agree to confidentiality in regards to what was spoken on the Freebird's board...and if that is true...you DID break a confidentiality agreement.
I forwarded the post by the "former admin" to Kyle and Jug...I will wait for their response thank you.


When I stated that I single handedly uncovered a cover-up - it was stated in jest. The reason I stated that is because it is obviously preposterous for anyone to think that. Proved by the Freebirds choosing to come forward and tell you that I posted the truth.

btw, I did not ask any of the Freebirds to come forward.

Your assumptions are incorrect and you are coming to those conclusions because you are ONLY getting your information fed to you from what Kyle chooses to tell you in your conversations now! NOT through months of knowing him, emails with him, posts of his etc.

Some simple questions you may consider when you try to weigh the truth:
If Kyle was so committed to bringing home Natalee, why did he try to sell the ROV footage back in Feb?
If Kyle was so committed to bringing home Natalee, why would he withhold evidence of a crime from the FBI?
If Kyle was so committed to bringing home Natalee, why would he withhold evidence from Beth, Dave?
If Kyle was so committed to bringing home Natalee, why did he have a secret meeting with Tim Tehran and by proxy, Louis Sachafer to cut John Silvetti out of the loop, have media ready to expose the evidence of the cage/trap?










Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #787 12/24/08 -
Post by: hotping on December 30, 2008, 05:27:14 PM
Hi Kermit.

I see ya lurking.

 ::MonkeyHaHa::

Janet

Hello Ms. Janet.
It's colder then a frogs tit where I am.



Hey Kermit its 70 Degrees in South Central Texas hop on down for some warmth and Margaritas..... ::MonkeyDance::  ::cartwheel::

I lurv Texas!
I lurv that restaurant called Panchos! Best Mexican food ever!


 ::MonkeyWink::

(http://i21.photobucket.com/albums/b258/texasmom55/KERMIT/K17.jpg)
Ridem Cowboy! Kermit looks Good in that Hat!  ::MonkeyWink::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #787 12/24/08 -
Post by: wingnut on December 30, 2008, 05:27:42 PM
ldstlou
Re: Natalee Case Discussion #787 12/24/08 -
« Reply #283 on: December 29, 2008, 10:20:17 PM »
I have real problem with Kermit.
/http://scaredmonkeys.net/index.php?topic=4269.280

Idstlou,
I am not going to do things or say things that have any agenda other then to expose the truth.
I am sorry you choose to interpret what you are told differently, but I do not. I have not taken
anything out of context. I have not violated any agreements. I HAVE given information of a crime
and cover-up to the appropriate individuals.
I will not belabor your opinion of me.




I just keep going back to your post about how you "single handily" uncovered the cover-up or something to that affect.  ::MonkeyNoNo:: Sounds like a bit of an ego trip to me...at the  expense of others.
I have no idea who the "former admin" is. Don't know either if the "former admin" is still a Freebird or a disgruntled ex-Freebird. I am under the impression that you did agree to confidentiality in regards to what was spoken on the Freebird's board...and if that is true...you DID break a confidentiality agreement.
I forwarded the post by the "former admin" to Kyle and Jug...I will wait for their response thank you.



From your post above:  I have no idea who the "former admin" is. Don't know either if the "former admin" is still a Freebird or a disgruntled ex-Freebird.

The answer is NEITHER.  Not a Freebird anymore.  Not disgruntled.

I am puzzled about your motive for questioning a group of people intent on uncovering the truth of what happened to Natalee.  The Freebirds' mission has been clear - answers for the family and justice for Natalee.  Nothing more, nothing less.



Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #787 12/24/08 -
Post by: ldstlou on December 30, 2008, 05:29:07 PM
ldstlou.If Jug & Kyle are aware of all of this why bother them with what they already know?Is this strictly about the Confidentiality Agreement?You seem to have a vested  interest in the disemination of the information!Correct me if i'm wrong.

I have stated over and over what it is about for me. The kid busted his butt on a ship looking for Natalee...all of the crew did...and to slander them now..is just plain disrespectful. Like them or not, agree with how the search went or not....that is one thing...but to insinuate that these people were in on a conspiracy with Aruban officials in my mind...in MY opinion...is just wrong. I am entitled to my opinion also.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #787 12/24/08 -
Post by: klaasend on December 30, 2008, 05:29:13 PM
ldstlou - I know you are only trying to stand up and protect Kyle and the crew of the Persistence against those who may have questions regarding some of the things Kyle has said, etc.

You are standing up for what you believe in and that is to be commended, however, what if you are wrong?  I'm not saying it's so but what if you and Natalee's family are being lied to?

When things don't seem right, we take a closer look.   Is that so wrong?

Hypothetical:

One of Joran's friends is posting in a private invite only forum where the members sign a confidentiality agreement not to copy and paste info posted in the forum on the outside.  This friend tells of information that would solve the case and put Joran in jail for the rest of his life.
  Do you tell others about this or do you honor the confidentiality agreement?

In the example above would a confidentiality agreement make any difference to you?  It would not to me.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #787 12/24/08 -
Post by: Tamikosmom on December 30, 2008, 05:30:18 PM

I just keep going back to your post about how you "single handily" uncovered the cover-up or something to that affect.  ::MonkeyNoNo:: Sounds like a bit of an ego trip to me...at the  expense of others.

I have no idea who the "former admin" is. Don't know either if the "former admin" is still a Freebird or a disgruntled ex-Freebird. I am under the impression that you did agree to confidentiality in regards to what was spoken on the Freebird's board...and if that is true...you DID break a confidentiality agreement.

I forwarded the post by the "former admin" to Kyle and Jug...I will wait for their response thank you.


Lou ... I posted the following to you last night.  Maybe you missed it.

Janet

++++++


How was Kermit ... who has staunchly upheld Natalee Holloway's family for 3 1/2 years ... to know when he went along with a "confidentiality agreement" on a private forum that Kyle Kingman's was about to reveal that the Persistence undertaking was nothing but a hoax to further the Aruban coverup ... a hoax that would insure that the family would never receive closure ... would never bring home their beloved home to rest on American soil.

A confidentiality agreement could not be honored under the circumstance.  The Persistence hoax needed to to exposed.

After being assured that Beth Holloway and the FBI were aware of the ROV images ... Kermit went out on a limb and took a personal risk on behalf of justice for Natalee Holloway and ... closure for her family and ... shared the truth on an open forum ... the SM Natalee Holloway Forum.

Maybe the finger pointing should be directed at Kyle Kingman ... not the messenger.

The ROV images that escaped ALE destruction and ... Kyles observations regarding the the Persistence hoax should have been immediately shared with the family and FBI upon setting foot on American soil rather than ... posting on a private and/or open forum.  Also there should have been no attempt to make a deal with major networks.

Janet



Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #787 12/24/08 -
Post by: Kermit on December 30, 2008, 05:30:38 PM
(http://i21.photobucket.com/albums/b258/texasmom55/KERMIT/K17.jpg)


Yee Haw!

Urban Cowboy!



Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #787 12/24/08 -
Post by: ldstlou on December 30, 2008, 05:33:16 PM
ldstlou
Re: Natalee Case Discussion #787 12/24/08 -
« Reply #283 on: December 29, 2008, 10:20:17 PM »
I have real problem with Kermit.
/http://scaredmonkeys.net/index.php?topic=4269.280

Idstlou,
I am not going to do things or say things that have any agenda other then to expose the truth.
I am sorry you choose to interpret what you are told differently, but I do not. I have not taken
anything out of context. I have not violated any agreements. I HAVE given information of a crime
and cover-up to the appropriate individuals.
I will not belabor your opinion of me.




I just keep going back to your post about how you "single handily" uncovered the cover-up or something to that affect.  ::MonkeyNoNo:: Sounds like a bit of an ego trip to me...at the  expense of others.
I have no idea who the "former admin" is. Don't know either if the "former admin" is still a Freebird or a disgruntled ex-Freebird. I am under the impression that you did agree to confidentiality in regards to what was spoken on the Freebird's board...and if that is true...you DID break a confidentiality agreement.
I forwarded the post by the "former admin" to Kyle and Jug...I will wait for their response thank you.



From your post above:  I have no idea who the "former admin" is. Don't know either if the "former admin" is still a Freebird or a disgruntled ex-Freebird.

The answer is NEITHER.  Not a Freebird anymore.  Not disgruntled.

I am puzzled about your motive for questioning a group of people intent on uncovering the truth of what happened to Natalee.  The Freebirds' mission has been clear - answers for the family and justice for Natalee.  Nothing more, nothing less.



so the person who wrote the letter is no longer a Freebird? Then why state I received this from the Freebirds as though they are indorsing the letter? It said "Received this from Natalee's Freebirds" . So was the letter from Natalee's Freebirds or a former member..that is all I am asking.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #787 12/24/08 -
Post by: Kermit on December 30, 2008, 05:33:25 PM
ldstlou.If Jug & Kyle are aware of all of this why bother them with what they already know?Is this strictly about the Confidentiality Agreement?You seem to have a vested  interest in the disemination of the information!Correct me if i'm wrong.

I have stated over and over what it is about for me. The kid busted his butt on a ship looking for Natalee...all of the crew did...and to slander them now..is just plain disrespectful. Like them or not, agree with how the search went or not....that is one thing...but to insinuate that these people were in on a conspiracy with Aruban officials in my mind...in MY opinion...is just wrong. I am entitled to my opinion also.

No one is slandering them.

The truth of what has taken place has been exposed however.
Which means the Aruban's have evidence of what was inside the cage/trap, Kyle admitted he has photos of that and tried to sell them.



Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #787 12/24/08 -
Post by: Keepthefaith on December 30, 2008, 05:33:49 PM
ldstlou.If Jug & Kyle are aware of all of this why bother them with what they already know?Is this strictly about the Confidentiality Agreement?You seem to have a vested  interest in the disemination of the information!Correct me if i'm wrong.

I have stated over and over what it is about for me. The kid busted his butt on a ship looking for Natalee...all of the crew did...and to slander them now..is just plain disrespectful. Like them or not, agree with how the search went or not....that is one thing...but to insinuate that these people were in on a conspiracy with Aruban officials in my mind...in MY opinion...is just wrong. I am entitled to my opinion also.

Kyle's own words are the problem!So he's slandering himself?


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #787 12/24/08 -
Post by: Kermit on December 30, 2008, 05:35:16 PM
ldstlou
Re: Natalee Case Discussion #787 12/24/08 -
« Reply #283 on: December 29, 2008, 10:20:17 PM »
I have real problem with Kermit.
/http://scaredmonkeys.net/index.php?topic=4269.280

Idstlou,
I am not going to do things or say things that have any agenda other then to expose the truth.
I am sorry you choose to interpret what you are told differently, but I do not. I have not taken
anything out of context. I have not violated any agreements. I HAVE given information of a crime
and cover-up to the appropriate individuals.
I will not belabor your opinion of me.




I just keep going back to your post about how you "single handily" uncovered the cover-up or something to that affect.  ::MonkeyNoNo:: Sounds like a bit of an ego trip to me...at the  expense of others.
I have no idea who the "former admin" is. Don't know either if the "former admin" is still a Freebird or a disgruntled ex-Freebird. I am under the impression that you did agree to confidentiality in regards to what was spoken on the Freebird's board...and if that is true...you DID break a confidentiality agreement.
I forwarded the post by the "former admin" to Kyle and Jug...I will wait for their response thank you.



From your post above:  I have no idea who the "former admin" is. Don't know either if the "former admin" is still a Freebird or a disgruntled ex-Freebird.

The answer is NEITHER.  Not a Freebird anymore.  Not disgruntled.

I am puzzled about your motive for questioning a group of people intent on uncovering the truth of what happened to Natalee.  The Freebirds' mission has been clear - answers for the family and justice for Natalee.  Nothing more, nothing less.



so the person who wrote the letter is no longer a Freebird? Then why state I received this from the Freebirds as though they are indorsing the letter? It said "Received this from Natalee's Freebirds" . So was the letter from Natalee's Freebirds or a former member..that is all I am asking.

As I read the letter, it stated it was the former administrator.



Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #787 12/24/08 -
Post by: crazybabyborg on December 30, 2008, 05:35:30 PM
I rarely have anything new to add to this thread. I do come to learn new things, and I come because I care about this case.

I have something to say today and it's this:

Who gives a rat's behind about ANYBODY breaking a "confidentiality" when the pursuit of truth as to what happened to Natalee and who is responsible is what's at stake???

If anyone, for any reason, would feel the need to put up a hurdle called "confidential" between the truth and answering those questions, then they have a problem; a BIG one!

No one should be involved in answering those questions who has any reservations about following the truth wherever that leads. Had ALE done that to begin with, this case would have been readily solved and Justice for Natalee would have long ago been attained.

If anyone would withold relevent information, or even possible relevent information, hostage for any reason, then they need to sign up to work for the Aruban authorities. They'll be quite at home there.

That's my opinion.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #787 12/24/08 -
Post by: jen3560 on December 30, 2008, 05:37:05 PM
Hello Monekys,

Thank you Klaas for approving my membership.

I am the former Natalee's Freebirds Administrator.

To answer ldstlou - NO, I am not disgruntled.  No, I am no longer a member at that forum.  I resigned today.

That is an outstanding group of people, with hearts of gold.  I admire and respect each and every one of them.

It was merely time for me to move on.  I felt that we had achieved all we could there over the past 2 1/2 years, and all of the Freebirds - former and current - will always be in my heart.

Kermit did the right thing by making this information public at Beth Holloway's request (albeit 2 months after she asked us to do so thanks to the need to avoid litigation).

I just simply couldn't stand by any longer and watch the continued confusion perpetrated by two particular posters here.  Whether it's been unintentional or deliberate - it really needs to stop now.

Wingnut made an excellent point - and I feel it's one that's been largely overlooked - pressure needs to be applied to get the answers as to what happened to the human remains Aruba recovered from that fishing cage.

Monkeys - you all are stellar at banding together and getting action.

The FBI can only do so much - with their limited jurisdiction.  They can speak to and subpoena from the members of the Persistence their statements and video to ascertain what was found.

Then it becomes an international issue.  Our State Department is where the encouragement is needed - to put pressure on the Hague to get to the bottom of this.

But something must be done.  Natalee's family has been through enough, and that they (and Natalee) were treated so shabbily by the one resource they felt they could trust is utterly heart wrenching.

Thank you Monkeys for allowing me to be here - let's help Natalee's family get some justice!


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #787 12/24/08 -
Post by: ldstlou on December 30, 2008, 05:37:48 PM
ldstlou - I know you are only trying to stand up and protect Kyle and the crew of the Persistence against those who may have questions regarding some of the things Kyle has said, etc.

You are standing up for what you believe in and that is to be commended, however, what if you are wrong?  I'm not saying it's so but what if you and Natalee's family are being lied to?

When things don't seem right, we take a closer look.   Is that so wrong?

Hypothetical:

One of Joran's friends is posting in a private invite only forum where the members sign a confidentiality agreement not to copy and paste info posted in the forum on the outside.  This friend tells of information that would solve the case and put Joran in jail for the rest of his life.
  Do you tell others about this or do you honor the confidentiality agreement?

In the example above would a confidentiality agreement make any difference to you?  It would not to me.

So the FBI were informed, JQK was informed, Beth was informed according to Kermit. I don't see them going after Kyle...so why is Kermit here on SM going after Kyle and the crew of the Persistence?


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #787 12/24/08 -
Post by: crazybabyborg on December 30, 2008, 05:40:19 PM
Hello Monekys,

Thank you Klaas for approving my membership.

I am the former Natalee's Freebirds Administrator.

To answer ldstlou - NO, I am not disgruntled.  No, I am no longer a member at that forum.  I resigned today.

That is an outstanding group of people, with hearts of gold.  I admire and respect each and every one of them.

It was merely time for me to move on.  I felt that we had achieved all we could there over the past 2 1/2 years, and all of the Freebirds - former and current - will always be in my heart.

Kermit did the right thing by making this information public at Beth Holloway's request (albeit 2 months after she asked us to do so thanks to the need to avoid litigation).

I just simply couldn't stand by any longer and watch the continued confusion perpetrated by two particular posters here.  Whether it's been unintentional or deliberate - it really needs to stop now.

Wingnut made an excellent point - and I feel it's one that's been largely overlooked - pressure needs to be applied to get the answers as to what happened to the human remains Aruba recovered from that fishing cage.

Monkeys - you all are stellar at banding together and getting action.

The FBI can only do so much - with their limited jurisdiction.  They can speak to and subpoena from the members of the Persistence their statements and video to ascertain what was found.

Then it becomes an international issue.  Our State Department is where the encouragement is needed - to put pressure on the Hague to get to the bottom of this.

But something must be done.  Natalee's family has been through enough, and that they (and Natalee) were treated so shabbily by the one resource they felt they could trust is utterly heart wrenching.

Thank you Monkeys for allowing me to be here - let's help Natalee's family get some justice!

W-E-L-C-O-M-E!!!        If I had a red carpet, I'd roll it out for you!!!


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #787 12/24/08 -
Post by: Keepthefaith on December 30, 2008, 05:40:57 PM
Hello Monekys,

Thank you Klaas for approving my membership.

I am the former Natalee's Freebirds Administrator.

To answer ldstlou - NO, I am not disgruntled.  No, I am no longer a member at that forum.  I resigned today.

That is an outstanding group of people, with hearts of gold.  I admire and respect each and every one of them.

It was merely time for me to move on.  I felt that we had achieved all we could there over the past 2 1/2 years, and all of the Freebirds - former and current - will always be in my heart.

Kermit did the right thing by making this information public at Beth Holloway's request (albeit 2 months after she asked us to do so thanks to the need to avoid litigation).

I just simply couldn't stand by any longer and watch the continued confusion perpetrated by two particular posters here.  Whether it's been unintentional or deliberate - it really needs to stop now.

Wingnut made an excellent point - and I feel it's one that's been largely overlooked - pressure needs to be applied to get the answers as to what happened to the human remains Aruba recovered from that fishing cage.

Monkeys - you all are stellar at banding together and getting action.

The FBI can only do so much - with their limited jurisdiction.  They can speak to and subpoena from the members of the Persistence their statements and video to ascertain what was found.

Then it becomes an international issue.  Our State Department is where the encouragement is needed - to put pressure on the Hague to get to the bottom of this.

But something must be done.  Natalee's family has been through enough, and that they (and Natalee) were treated so shabbily by the one resource they felt they could trust is utterly heart wrenching.

Thank you Monkeys for allowing me to be here - let's help Natalee's family get some justice!

Thank you Jen as well as th Freebirds.If Kyle has mislead the Freebirds as well as Monkey's.Why and who is continuing to defend him..Kyle is more then welcome to answer questions for himself...Correct me if i'm wrong!TIA


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #787 12/24/08 -
Post by: Tamikosmom on December 30, 2008, 05:43:01 PM
ldstlou.If Jug & Kyle are aware of all of this why bother them with what they already know?Is this strictly about the Confidentiality Agreement?You seem to have a vested  interest in the disemination of the information!Correct me if i'm wrong.

I have stated over and over what it is about for me. The kid busted his butt on a ship looking for Natalee...all of the crew did...and to slander them now..is just plain disrespectful. Like them or not, agree with how the search went or not....that is one thing...but to insinuate that these people were in on a conspiracy with Aruban officials in my mind...in MY opinion...is just wrong. I am entitled to my opinion also.

Kyle is not a kid.  He is a husband and he is a father who held a professional position on the Persistence.

Lou ... please read Kyles own words.  I have posted them over and over and over again.  It is Kyle and ... only Kyle who insinuates ... nobody else.  Hey ... not only Monkey or on Freebird was on that ship.  It is only Kyle who can offer a perspective.

I only wish Kyle's perspective was not shared with either a private or a public forum.  I wish it had been shared with the FBI and the family immediately upon arriving home to the States from Aruba.

Janet


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #787 12/24/08 -
Post by: ldstlou on December 30, 2008, 05:43:13 PM
Hello Monekys,

Thank you Klaas for approving my membership.

I am the former Natalee's Freebirds Administrator.

To answer ldstlou - NO, I am not disgruntled.  No, I am no longer a member at that forum.  I resigned today.

That is an outstanding group of people, with hearts of gold.  I admire and respect each and every one of them.

It was merely time for me to move on.  I felt that we had achieved all we could there over the past 2 1/2 years, and all of the Freebirds - former and current - will always be in my heart.

Kermit did the right thing by making this information public at Beth Holloway's request (albeit 2 months after she asked us to do so thanks to the need to avoid litigation).

I just simply couldn't stand by any longer and watch the continued confusion perpetrated by two particular posters here.  Whether it's been unintentional or deliberate - it really needs to stop now.

Wingnut made an excellent point - and I feel it's one that's been largely overlooked - pressure needs to be applied to get the answers as to what happened to the human remains Aruba recovered from that fishing cage.

Monkeys - you all are stellar at banding together and getting action.

The FBI can only do so much - with their limited jurisdiction.  They can speak to and subpoena from the members of the Persistence their statements and video to ascertain what was found.

Then it becomes an international issue.  Our State Department is where the encouragement is needed - to put pressure on the Hague to get to the bottom of this.

But something must be done.  Natalee's family has been through enough, and that they (and Natalee) were treated so shabbily by the one resource they felt they could trust is utterly heart wrenching.

Thank you Monkeys for allowing me to be here - let's help Natalee's family get some justice!

So then you are no longer a Freebird..is that correct? So then to say that your letter is from the "Freebird's"..is that incorrect? Did the current members endorse your letter?


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #787 12/24/08 -
Post by: Kermit on December 30, 2008, 05:44:38 PM
ldstlou - I know you are only trying to stand up and protect Kyle and the crew of the Persistence against those who may have questions regarding some of the things Kyle has said, etc.

You are standing up for what you believe in and that is to be commended, however, what if you are wrong?  I'm not saying it's so but what if you and Natalee's family are being lied to?

When things don't seem right, we take a closer look.   Is that so wrong?

Hypothetical:

One of Joran's friends is posting in a private invite only forum where the members sign a confidentiality agreement not to copy and paste info posted in the forum on the outside.  This friend tells of information that would solve the case and put Joran in jail for the rest of his life.
  Do you tell others about this or do you honor the confidentiality agreement?

In the example above would a confidentiality agreement make any difference to you?  It would not to me.

So the FBI were informed, JQK was informed, Beth was informed according to Kermit. I don't see them going after Kyle...so why is Kermit here on SM going after Kyle and the crew of the Persistence?

Kermit informed Beth. Yes.
Kermit is NOT going after Kyle.
Kermit posted the truth to expose the Aruba cover-up




Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #787 12/24/08 -
Post by: Buckeye on December 30, 2008, 05:45:19 PM
Kermit posted Kyle's words.

During the analysis of Kyle's words, issues have been raised.

Don't shoot the messenger.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #787 12/24/08 -
Post by: ldstlou on December 30, 2008, 05:45:34 PM
Hello Monekys,

Thank you Klaas for approving my membership.

I am the former Natalee's Freebirds Administrator.

To answer ldstlou - NO, I am not disgruntled.  No, I am no longer a member at that forum.  I resigned today.

That is an outstanding group of people, with hearts of gold.  I admire and respect each and every one of them.

It was merely time for me to move on.  I felt that we had achieved all we could there over the past 2 1/2 years, and all of the Freebirds - former and current - will always be in my heart.

Kermit did the right thing by making this information public at Beth Holloway's request (albeit 2 months after she asked us to do so thanks to the need to avoid litigation).

I just simply couldn't stand by any longer and watch the continued confusion perpetrated by two particular posters here.  Whether it's been unintentional or deliberate - it really needs to stop now.

Wingnut made an excellent point - and I feel it's one that's been largely overlooked - pressure needs to be applied to get the answers as to what happened to the human remains Aruba recovered from that fishing cage.

Monkeys - you all are stellar at banding together and getting action.

The FBI can only do so much - with their limited jurisdiction.  They can speak to and subpoena from the members of the Persistence their statements and video to ascertain what was found.

Then it becomes an international issue.  Our State Department is where the encouragement is needed - to put pressure on the Hague to get to the bottom of this.

But something must be done.  Natalee's family has been through enough, and that they (and Natalee) were treated so shabbily by the one resource they felt they could trust is utterly heart wrenching.

Thank you Monkeys for allowing me to be here - let's help Natalee's family get some justice!

Thank you Jen as well as th Freebirds.If Kyle has mislead the Freebirds as well as Monkey's.Why and who is continuing to defend him..Kyle is more then welcome to answer questions for himself...Correct me if i'm wrong!TIA

He doesn't want to. You all can call him out every day...he doesn't feel the need to defend himself and frankly I agree with him. If Beth or Dave have questions for him, they know how to contact him. He doesn't owe the Scared Monkeys anything. This is your beef not his. He chooses not to get involved. That is his right and his choice.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #787 12/24/08 -
Post by: Kermit on December 30, 2008, 05:46:34 PM
I rarely have anything new to add to this thread. I do come to learn new things, and I come because I care about this case.

I have something to say today and it's this:

Who gives a rat's behind about ANYBODY breaking a "confidentiality" when the pursuit of truth as to what happened to Natalee and who is responsible is what's at stake???

If anyone, for any reason, would feel the need to put up a hurdle called "confidential" between the truth and answering those questions, then they have a problem; a BIG one!

No one should be involved in answering those questions who has any reservations about following the truth wherever that leads. Had ALE done that to begin with, this case would have been readily solved and Justice for Natalee would have long ago been attained.

If anyone would withold relevent information, or even possible relevent information, hostage for any reason, then they need to sign up to work for the Aruban authorities. They'll be quite at home there.

That's my opinion.

Very well stated.



Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #787 12/24/08 -
Post by: Keepthefaith on December 30, 2008, 05:46:40 PM
From where i sit in Seattle ldstlou it seems from my perspective your only problem is the disemination of the information to people other then the Freebirds!Why?And do correct me if i'm wrong.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #787 12/24/08 -
Post by: truthseeker2 on December 30, 2008, 05:46:41 PM
Isn't that the point......Truthseeker2  "We still have no idea what was in that trap."

Well....it has been MY point from the very beginning.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #787 12/24/08 -
Post by: ldstlou on December 30, 2008, 05:48:04 PM
ldstlou - I know you are only trying to stand up and protect Kyle and the crew of the Persistence against those who may have questions regarding some of the things Kyle has said, etc.

You are standing up for what you believe in and that is to be commended, however, what if you are wrong?  I'm not saying it's so but what if you and Natalee's family are being lied to?

When things don't seem right, we take a closer look.   Is that so wrong?

Hypothetical:

One of Joran's friends is posting in a private invite only forum where the members sign a confidentiality agreement not to copy and paste info posted in the forum on the outside.  This friend tells of information that would solve the case and put Joran in jail for the rest of his life.
  Do you tell others about this or do you honor the confidentiality agreement?

In the example above would a confidentiality agreement make any difference to you?  It would not to me.

So the FBI were informed, JQK was informed, Beth was informed according to Kermit. I don't see them going after Kyle...so why is Kermit here on SM going after Kyle and the crew of the Persistence?

Kermit informed Beth. Yes.
Kermit is NOT going after Kyle.
Kermit posted the truth to expose the Aruba cover-up




Kermit...come on. IF the Arubans walked away with Natalee...it was Kyle who exposed it not you.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #787 12/24/08 -
Post by: Keepthefaith on December 30, 2008, 05:48:06 PM
Isn't that the point......Truthseeker2  "We still have no idea what was in that trap."

Well....it has been MY point from the very beginning.

We'll never know what is in the trap and why?


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #787 12/24/08 -
Post by: truthseeker2 on December 30, 2008, 05:49:36 PM


truthseeker

Thank you for your response and ... I mean it.

Janet

I am glad that you do.  You and I are not enemies.  We just approach things differently.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #787 12/24/08 -
Post by: texasmom on December 30, 2008, 05:50:05 PM
Hello Monekys,

Thank you Klaas for approving my membership.

I am the former Natalee's Freebirds Administrator.

To answer ldstlou - NO, I am not disgruntled.  No, I am no longer a member at that forum.  I resigned today.

That is an outstanding group of people, with hearts of gold.  I admire and respect each and every one of them.

It was merely time for me to move on.  I felt that we had achieved all we could there over the past 2 1/2 years, and all of the Freebirds - former and current - will always be in my heart.

Kermit did the right thing by making this information public at Beth Holloway's request (albeit 2 months after she asked us to do so thanks to the need to avoid litigation).

I just simply couldn't stand by any longer and watch the continued confusion perpetrated by two particular posters here.  Whether it's been unintentional or deliberate - it really needs to stop now.

Wingnut made an excellent point - and I feel it's one that's been largely overlooked - pressure needs to be applied to get the answers as to what happened to the human remains Aruba recovered from that fishing cage.

Monkeys - you all are stellar at banding together and getting action.

The FBI can only do so much - with their limited jurisdiction.  They can speak to and subpoena from the members of the Persistence their statements and video to ascertain what was found.

Then it becomes an international issue.  Our State Department is where the encouragement is needed - to put pressure on the Hague to get to the bottom of this.

But something must be done.  Natalee's family has been through enough, and that they (and Natalee) were treated so shabbily by the one resource they felt they could trust is utterly heart wrenching.

Thank you Monkeys for allowing me to be here - let's help Natalee's family get some justice!

Welcome to Scared Monkeys Jen!  And thank you!   ::MonkeyCool::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #787 12/24/08 -
Post by: ldstlou on December 30, 2008, 05:50:42 PM
From where i sit in Seattle ldstlou it seems from my perspective your only problem is the disemination of the information to people other then the Freebirds!Why?And do correct me if i'm wrong.

Part of it yes. Because my understanding is that there was an agreement to keep the info confidential..and that bothers me.

But the other part is that Kyle wasn't hiding anything that I can see. He was discussing his concerns openly in that forum. Concerns about the Arubans not the members of the Persitence. So why degrade and bastardize the hard work of those members who went out looking for Natalee.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #787 12/24/08 -
Post by: Keepthefaith on December 30, 2008, 05:50:48 PM
ldstlou - I know you are only trying to stand up and protect Kyle and the crew of the Persistence against those who may have questions regarding some of the things Kyle has said, etc.

You are standing up for what you believe in and that is to be commended, however, what if you are wrong?  I'm not saying it's so but what if you and Natalee's family are being lied to?

When things don't seem right, we take a closer look.   Is that so wrong?

Hypothetical:

One of Joran's friends is posting in a private invite only forum where the members sign a confidentiality agreement not to copy and paste info posted in the forum on the outside.  This friend tells of information that would solve the case and put Joran in jail for the rest of his life.
  Do you tell others about this or do you honor the confidentiality agreement?

In the example above would a confidentiality agreement make any difference to you?  It would not to me.

So the FBI were informed, JQK was informed, Beth was informed according to Kermit. I don't see them going after Kyle...so why is Kermit here on SM going after Kyle and the crew of the Persistence?

Kermit informed Beth. Yes.
Kermit is NOT going after Kyle.
Kermit posted the truth to expose the Aruba cover-up




Kermit...come on. IF the Arubans walked away with Natalee...it was Kyle who exposed it not you.

How can Kyle expose something he didn't turn over to the proper authorities,and or family in due diligence????


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #787 12/24/08 -
Post by: Kermit on December 30, 2008, 05:51:04 PM
ldstlou - I know you are only trying to stand up and protect Kyle and the crew of the Persistence against those who may have questions regarding some of the things Kyle has said, etc.

You are standing up for what you believe in and that is to be commended, however, what if you are wrong?  I'm not saying it's so but what if you and Natalee's family are being lied to?

When things don't seem right, we take a closer look.   Is that so wrong?

Hypothetical:

One of Joran's friends is posting in a private invite only forum where the members sign a confidentiality agreement not to copy and paste info posted in the forum on the outside.  This friend tells of information that would solve the case and put Joran in jail for the rest of his life.
  Do you tell others about this or do you honor the confidentiality agreement?

In the example above would a confidentiality agreement make any difference to you?  It would not to me.

So the FBI were informed, JQK was informed, Beth was informed according to Kermit. I don't see them going after Kyle...so why is Kermit here on SM going after Kyle and the crew of the Persistence?

Kermit informed Beth. Yes.
Kermit is NOT going after Kyle.
Kermit posted the truth to expose the Aruba cover-up




Kermit...come on. IF the Arubans walked away with Natalee...it was Kyle who exposed it not you.

If it's credit you want to give Kyle - go for it!
Kyle exposed it to whom?
He tried to sell the ROV footage!




Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #787 12/24/08 -
Post by: hotping on December 30, 2008, 05:51:52 PM
Hello Monekys,

Thank you Klaas for approving my membership.

I am the former Natalee's Freebirds Administrator.

To answer ldstlou - NO, I am not disgruntled.  No, I am no longer a member at that forum.  I resigned today.

That is an outstanding group of people, with hearts of gold.  I admire and respect each and every one of them.

It was merely time for me to move on.  I felt that we had achieved all we could there over the past 2 1/2 years, and all of the Freebirds - former and current - will always be in my heart.

Kermit did the right thing by making this information public at Beth Holloway's request (albeit 2 months after she asked us to do so thanks to the need to avoid litigation).

I just simply couldn't stand by any longer and watch the continued confusion perpetrated by two particular posters here.  Whether it's been unintentional or deliberate - it really needs to stop now.

Wingnut made an excellent point - and I feel it's one that's been largely overlooked - pressure needs to be applied to get the answers as to what happened to the human remains Aruba recovered from that fishing cage.

Monkeys - you all are stellar at banding together and getting action.

The FBI can only do so much - with their limited jurisdiction.  They can speak to and subpoena from the members of the Persistence their statements and video to ascertain what was found.

Then it becomes an international issue.  Our State Department is where the encouragement is needed - to put pressure on the Hague to get to the bottom of this.

But something must be done.  Natalee's family has been through enough, and that they (and Natalee) were treated so shabbily by the one resource they felt they could trust is utterly heart wrenching.

Thank you Monkeys for allowing me to be here - let's help Natalee's family get some justice!

Thank you Jen as well as th Freebirds.If Kyle has mislead the Freebirds as well as Monkey's.Why and who is continuing to defend him..Kyle is more then welcome to answer questions for himself...Correct me if i'm wrong!TIA

He doesn't want to. You all can call him out every day...he doesn't feel the need to defend himself and frankly I agree with him. If Beth or Dave have questions for him, they know how to contact him. He doesn't owe the Scared Monkeys anything. This is your beef not his. He chooses not to get involved. That is his right and his choice.
Can't You just drop it and let things fall the way they may....Kyle can come here anytime He chooses to state whatever He chooses but You need to let Him be a big boy and deliver the message Himself.....Let Him do His on talking!  Please!


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #787 12/24/08 -
Post by: Keepthefaith on December 30, 2008, 05:52:27 PM
From where i sit in Seattle ldstlou it seems from my perspective your only problem is the disemination of the information to people other then the Freebirds!Why?And do correct me if i'm wrong.

Part of it yes. Because my understanding is that there was an agreement to keep the info confidential..and that bothers me.

But the other part is that Kyle wasn't hiding anything that I can see. He was discussing his concerns openly in that forum. Concerns about the Arubans not the members of the Persitence. So why degrade and bastardize the hard work of those members who went out looking for Natalee.

Did Kermit not give Kyle every opportunity to turn everything he had,as well as knew over to the Holloway's as well as the FBI?Did he do it?From what i've read.NO..Correct me if i'm wrong..


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #787 12/24/08 -
Post by: wingnut on December 30, 2008, 05:53:43 PM
Hi Jen, Hi Kermit.  A reunion of sorts.  I have missed posting with you, ya little Hopper!  And Jen - you have done a wonderful job of giving us a peaceful place to work on documents for so long.  Thank you, and I will miss you. 

Jen is right - the hearts of the Freebirds are golden.  We have worked tirelessly to post factual information - derived from the posts and publications pertaining to the case.  That has not changed.  Confidentiality?  Pfffft.  I will not hide behind a confidentiality agreement when morally convicted.  Keep MY daughter's resting place and remains secret, and I will pursue your azz to the ends of the earth.   


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #787 12/24/08 -
Post by: ldstlou on December 30, 2008, 05:54:33 PM
ldstlou - I know you are only trying to stand up and protect Kyle and the crew of the Persistence against those who may have questions regarding some of the things Kyle has said, etc.

You are standing up for what you believe in and that is to be commended, however, what if you are wrong?  I'm not saying it's so but what if you and Natalee's family are being lied to?

When things don't seem right, we take a closer look.   Is that so wrong?

Hypothetical:

One of Joran's friends is posting in a private invite only forum where the members sign a confidentiality agreement not to copy and paste info posted in the forum on the outside.  This friend tells of information that would solve the case and put Joran in jail for the rest of his life.
  Do you tell others about this or do you honor the confidentiality agreement?

In the example above would a confidentiality agreement make any difference to you?  It would not to me.

So the FBI were informed, JQK was informed, Beth was informed according to Kermit. I don't see them going after Kyle...so why is Kermit here on SM going after Kyle and the crew of the Persistence?

Kermit informed Beth. Yes.
Kermit is NOT going after Kyle.
Kermit posted the truth to expose the Aruba cover-up




Kermit...come on. IF the Arubans walked away with Natalee...it was Kyle who exposed it not you.

How can Kyle expose something he didn't turn over to the proper authorities,and or family in due diligence????


ummmm...I'll say it again...kermit copied and posted Kyle's info...she reiterated what he said...so where's the cover-up if he said it.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #787 12/24/08 -
Post by: Kermit on December 30, 2008, 05:54:35 PM
From where i sit in Seattle ldstlou it seems from my perspective your only problem is the disemination of the information to people other then the Freebirds!Why?And do correct me if i'm wrong.

Part of it yes. Because my understanding is that there was an agreement to keep the info confidential..and that bothers me.

But the other part is that Kyle wasn't hiding anything that I can see. He was discussing his concerns openly in that forum. Concerns about the Arubans not the members of the Persitence. So why degrade and bastardize the hard work of those members who went out looking for Natalee.

So according to your thinking, the evidence should still be waiting for Kyle or John Silvetti to sell it?

You see a crime, you don't tell is that it?





Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #787 12/24/08 -
Post by: ldstlou on December 30, 2008, 05:55:13 PM
ldstlou - I know you are only trying to stand up and protect Kyle and the crew of the Persistence against those who may have questions regarding some of the things Kyle has said, etc.

You are standing up for what you believe in and that is to be commended, however, what if you are wrong?  I'm not saying it's so but what if you and Natalee's family are being lied to?

When things don't seem right, we take a closer look.   Is that so wrong?

Hypothetical:

One of Joran's friends is posting in a private invite only forum where the members sign a confidentiality agreement not to copy and paste info posted in the forum on the outside.  This friend tells of information that would solve the case and put Joran in jail for the rest of his life.
  Do you tell others about this or do you honor the confidentiality agreement?

In the example above would a confidentiality agreement make any difference to you?  It would not to me.

So the FBI were informed, JQK was informed, Beth was informed according to Kermit. I don't see them going after Kyle...so why is Kermit here on SM going after Kyle and the crew of the Persistence?

Kermit informed Beth. Yes.
Kermit is NOT going after Kyle.
Kermit posted the truth to expose the Aruba cover-up




Kermit...come on. IF the Arubans walked away with Natalee...it was Kyle who exposed it not you.

If it's credit you want to give Kyle - go for it!
Kyle exposed it to whom?
He tried to sell the ROV footage!




your point being?


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #787 12/24/08 -
Post by: Kermit on December 30, 2008, 05:56:00 PM
From where i sit in Seattle ldstlou it seems from my perspective your only problem is the disemination of the information to people other then the Freebirds!Why?And do correct me if i'm wrong.

Part of it yes. Because my understanding is that there was an agreement to keep the info confidential..and that bothers me.

But the other part is that Kyle wasn't hiding anything that I can see. He was discussing his concerns openly in that forum. Concerns about the Arubans not the members of the Persitence. So why degrade and bastardize the hard work of those members who went out looking for Natalee.

Did Kermit not give Kyle every opportunity to turn everything he had,as well as knew over to the Holloway's as well as the FBI?Did he do it?From what i've read.NO..Correct me if i'm wrong..

You are not wrong.
In fact, I have proof of permission from the family.




Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #787 12/24/08 -
Post by: ldstlou on December 30, 2008, 05:56:09 PM
Hello Monekys,

Thank you Klaas for approving my membership.

I am the former Natalee's Freebirds Administrator.

To answer ldstlou - NO, I am not disgruntled.  No, I am no longer a member at that forum.  I resigned today.

That is an outstanding group of people, with hearts of gold.  I admire and respect each and every one of them.

It was merely time for me to move on.  I felt that we had achieved all we could there over the past 2 1/2 years, and all of the Freebirds - former and current - will always be in my heart.

Kermit did the right thing by making this information public at Beth Holloway's request (albeit 2 months after she asked us to do so thanks to the need to avoid litigation).

I just simply couldn't stand by any longer and watch the continued confusion perpetrated by two particular posters here.  Whether it's been unintentional or deliberate - it really needs to stop now.

Wingnut made an excellent point - and I feel it's one that's been largely overlooked - pressure needs to be applied to get the answers as to what happened to the human remains Aruba recovered from that fishing cage.

Monkeys - you all are stellar at banding together and getting action.

The FBI can only do so much - with their limited jurisdiction.  They can speak to and subpoena from the members of the Persistence their statements and video to ascertain what was found.

Then it becomes an international issue.  Our State Department is where the encouragement is needed - to put pressure on the Hague to get to the bottom of this.

But something must be done.  Natalee's family has been through enough, and that they (and Natalee) were treated so shabbily by the one resource they felt they could trust is utterly heart wrenching.

Thank you Monkeys for allowing me to be here - let's help Natalee's family get some justice!

So then you are no longer a Freebird..is that correct? So then to say that your letter is from the "Freebird's"..is that incorrect? Did the current members endorse your letter?

bump


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #787 12/24/08 -
Post by: Tamikosmom on December 30, 2008, 05:56:22 PM
Klaas

I messed up again.  Please edit my post 490.

Hey ... no Monkey or Freebird was on that ship.

My New Year's resolution is to never never bother you again in regards to editing my posts.  The way I look at it ... I still have a couple of days of grace.

  ::MonkeyHaHa::

Thanks

Janet


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #787 12/24/08 -
Post by: Keepthefaith on December 30, 2008, 05:56:27 PM
ldstlou - I know you are only trying to stand up and protect Kyle and the crew of the Persistence against those who may have questions regarding some of the things Kyle has said, etc.

You are standing up for what you believe in and that is to be commended, however, what if you are wrong?  I'm not saying it's so but what if you and Natalee's family are being lied to?

When things don't seem right, we take a closer look.   Is that so wrong?

Hypothetical:

One of Joran's friends is posting in a private invite only forum where the members sign a confidentiality agreement not to copy and paste info posted in the forum on the outside.  This friend tells of information that would solve the case and put Joran in jail for the rest of his life.
  Do you tell others about this or do you honor the confidentiality agreement?

In the example above would a confidentiality agreement make any difference to you?  It would not to me.

So the FBI were informed, JQK was informed, Beth was informed according to Kermit. I don't see them going after Kyle...so why is Kermit here on SM going after Kyle and the crew of the Persistence?

Kermit informed Beth. Yes.
Kermit is NOT going after Kyle.
Kermit posted the truth to expose the Aruba cover-up




Kermit...come on. IF the Arubans walked away with Natalee...it was Kyle who exposed it not you.

How can Kyle expose something he didn't turn over to the proper authorities,and or family in due diligence????


ummmm...I'll say it again...kermit copied and posted Kyle's info...she reiterated what he said...so where's the cover-up if he said it.

Again ldstlou.Did Kyle turn over everything he had pertaining to Natalee's search in Due diligence to the family as well as the FBI?Yes or No?


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #787 12/24/08 -
Post by: ldstlou on December 30, 2008, 05:57:04 PM
From where i sit in Seattle ldstlou it seems from my perspective your only problem is the disemination of the information to people other then the Freebirds!Why?And do correct me if i'm wrong.

Part of it yes. Because my understanding is that there was an agreement to keep the info confidential..and that bothers me.

But the other part is that Kyle wasn't hiding anything that I can see. He was discussing his concerns openly in that forum. Concerns about the Arubans not the members of the Persitence. So why degrade and bastardize the hard work of those members who went out looking for Natalee.

Did Kermit not give Kyle every opportunity to turn everything he had,as well as knew over to the Holloway's as well as the FBI?Did he do it?From what i've read.NO..Correct me if i'm wrong..

You are not wrong.
In fact, I have proof of permission from the family.




the e-mail you posted?


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #787 12/24/08 -
Post by: truthseeker2 on December 30, 2008, 05:57:28 PM
truthseeker

I would sincerely appreciate your perspective on this topic when the confirmation from the Freebird's former administrator is considered.  Has it changed?

Thank you.

Janet

++++++

I think the postings about Kyle have been too harsh.  He clearly expressed his concerns all along and provided tons of info that would never have been available otherwise.  I also agree that some of what he said may have been taken out of context.  It's easy to question everything he did in retrospect, but I think he did his best functioning in a complex situation and had good intentions.  Sometimes things are not black and white, and of course he has to protect himself and his livelihood and reputation.  I think it was a mistake to alienate him, and I don't think he owes it to SM to defend himself.  Sometimes you are placed in a situation where it's a no-win no matter what you do. And using his religious beliefs to try to get him to come back and explain seems cruel. 

Thank you!!  Well said.


No, Janet, it hasn't.  We still have no idea what was in that trap.  That has been my perspective from the very beginning.  That has not changed.  The idea that I like coming to SM to see the same thing posted over and over and over has not changed either.  I have the same goal as every other person who posts at this site.  I just do not get the same level respect.  And...heaven forbid you decide to make me your next target. Why...I shake in my boots.  But, I guess that is the type of thing that makes it all go 'round for some.

Me, as I have stated before, I am an analyst...and a damn good one.  I still do not see any facts indicating there were human remains in that trap.  Are we to assume that as fact because Kyle says so?  From what I can tell from most of the posts here lately...he is not to be believed.  Which is it?  Is he trutworthy or not?  So for me, until it is proven that human remains were found and that those human remains were Natalee's I will keep looking for answers.

Also, as an analyst, I fully understand contract work and the use/non-use of intellectual property.  Kyle may have disseminated that information within violation of a contract, and therefore his azz would be on the line.  If he is wrong, and he may be wrong, he may never be able to work again in his current capacity.  For whatever reason, he chose to do what he did.  I was not there, so I cannot and do not judge his actions. 

I accept the information regading the contents of the trap for what it is...his opinion...nothing more.  Calling him out on a forum day in and day out has not changed any of the known facts about Natalee.  It's all supposition.  I hope that someone has the where with all to get to the bottom of it, like our FBI.  But, they have had this information for a while now and we have not heard a word from them as to any future investigation.  We are only hearing a request for further investigations from the Netherlands.

And I also agree with whoever posted last night....trying to appeal to someone's faith is a personal thing...people can do that in open forums if they like.  It's not something I would do.

Back to lurking and researching......

I'm not answering for Janet,

But I just wanted to give you my own opinion.
Kyle said it was remains and considering he is the geophysicist who knows how to interpret the information he sees, then I tended to believe him. In addition, I didn't think it was highly likely that he'd be trying to sell the ROV footage to producers if it was a sponge or rock.

Also, I believe, that Tim Miller has seen enough skulls to be able to differentiate real from fake. I think he saw what he says he saw.

And why would only Aruban divers sweep in, collect the material fromt he trap if it was not important. Why dive and spend money to collect a sponge or rock?







So...where are the supportive comments of the Mansurs?  Jossy's son was there.  He should know.  Why has he not come out with this 'story'?  I am asking this with all seriousness.  I am considering ALL information here.  If the Mansurs are supporting the family they way we think they are, would they let the fact the human remains were found and that those remains were Natalee's go by the wayside?  Jossy has supported the arrest of the Van Der Sloots for a while now.  Having those remians would certainly make a good case for putting at least Joran back in jail.

But we have not heard anything from Eduardo or Jossy.

So...were those really remains down there and if so, whose?  I know.  We have all been asking that question and the email from Freebirds has not been able to answer that.  I do not mean that as a slam, just that I do not see any new information.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #787 12/24/08 -
Post by: jen3560 on December 30, 2008, 05:58:06 PM
From where i sit in Seattle ldstlou it seems from my perspective your only problem is the disemination of the information to people other then the Freebirds!Why?And do correct me if i'm wrong.

Part of it yes. Because my understanding is that there was an agreement to keep the info confidential..and that bothers me.

But the other part is that Kyle wasn't hiding anything that I can see. He was discussing his concerns openly in that forum. Concerns about the Arubans not the members of the Persitence. So why degrade and bastardize the hard work of those members who went out looking for Natalee.

I think you may have missed the point entirely.

I am the one who wrote the TOS at Natalee's Freebirds.  It is those TOS that every member has to abide by.  There was no confidentiality agreement by ANY member that supercedes the TOS of the forum.  The TOS provide for that eventuality.

Please stop concerning yourself with some "confidentiality agreement" that never existed in the first place.

The real truth of the matter is - it was all about money.  By Freebirds going public with the information Kyle provided, that would have squelched the deal Kyle told us Shaefer made for a documentary.

That's it.  That's the sum total of it.

Kermit violated no TOS, as he posted here after he resigned from the forum.  I deactivated his account at Freebirds after he did so.  Does that make you feel better?

Now - can we PLEASE get back to the ACTUAL issue here?

What did Aruba do with those remains, and why did they send the FBI some fraudulent piece of material to test?

Why did it take Dolph Richardson two weeks after receiving the items personally, to hand over lord only knows what to the FBI for testing?

And why did every single member aboard the Persistence look the other way?


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #787 12/24/08 -
Post by: Kermit on December 30, 2008, 05:58:08 PM
ldstlou - I know you are only trying to stand up and protect Kyle and the crew of the Persistence against those who may have questions regarding some of the things Kyle has said, etc.

You are standing up for what you believe in and that is to be commended, however, what if you are wrong?  I'm not saying it's so but what if you and Natalee's family are being lied to?

When things don't seem right, we take a closer look.   Is that so wrong?

Hypothetical:

One of Joran's friends is posting in a private invite only forum where the members sign a confidentiality agreement not to copy and paste info posted in the forum on the outside.  This friend tells of information that would solve the case and put Joran in jail for the rest of his life.
  Do you tell others about this or do you honor the confidentiality agreement?

In the example above would a confidentiality agreement make any difference to you?  It would not to me.

So the FBI were informed, JQK was informed, Beth was informed according to Kermit. I don't see them going after Kyle...so why is Kermit here on SM going after Kyle and the crew of the Persistence?

Kermit informed Beth. Yes.
Kermit is NOT going after Kyle.
Kermit posted the truth to expose the Aruba cover-up




Kermit...come on. IF the Arubans walked away with Natalee...it was Kyle who exposed it not you.

If it's credit you want to give Kyle - go for it!
Kyle exposed it to whom?
He tried to sell the ROV footage!




your point being?

Kyle specifically stated he tried to "strike a deal" to sell the ROV photos of what he stated he believed to be the remains of Natalee Holloway.

How come you think that is okay?





Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #787 12/24/08 -
Post by: ldstlou on December 30, 2008, 05:58:14 PM
From where i sit in Seattle ldstlou it seems from my perspective your only problem is the disemination of the information to people other then the Freebirds!Why?And do correct me if i'm wrong.

Part of it yes. Because my understanding is that there was an agreement to keep the info confidential..and that bothers me.

But the other part is that Kyle wasn't hiding anything that I can see. He was discussing his concerns openly in that forum. Concerns about the Arubans not the members of the Persitence. So why degrade and bastardize the hard work of those members who went out looking for Natalee.

So according to your thinking, the evidence should still be waiting for Kyle or John Silvetti to sell it?

You see a crime, you don't tell is that it?





I will ask again...do the current Freebirds endorse your actions or views?


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #787 12/24/08 -
Post by: ldstlou on December 30, 2008, 06:00:21 PM
From where i sit in Seattle ldstlou it seems from my perspective your only problem is the disemination of the information to people other then the Freebirds!Why?And do correct me if i'm wrong.

Part of it yes. Because my understanding is that there was an agreement to keep the info confidential..and that bothers me.

But the other part is that Kyle wasn't hiding anything that I can see. He was discussing his concerns openly in that forum. Concerns about the Arubans not the members of the Persitence. So why degrade and bastardize the hard work of those members who went out looking for Natalee.

I think you may have missed the point entirely.

I am the one who wrote the TOS at Natalee's Freebirds.  It is those TOS that every member has to abide by.  There was no confidentiality agreement by ANY member that supercedes the TOS of the forum.  The TOS provide for that eventuality.

Please stop concerning yourself with some "confidentiality agreement" that never existed in the first place.

The real truth of the matter is - it was all about money.  By Freebirds going public with the information Kyle provided, that would have squelched the deal Kyle told us Shaefer made for a documentary.

That's it.  That's the sum total of it.

Kermit violated no TOS, as he posted here after he resigned from the forum.  I deactivated his account at Freebirds after he did so.  Does that make you feel better?

Now - can we PLEASE get back to the ACTUAL issue here?

What did Aruba do with those remains, and why did they send the FBI some fraudulent piece of material to test?

Why did it take Dolph Richardson two weeks after receiving the items personally, to hand over lord only knows what to the FBI for testing?

And why did every single member aboard the Persistence look the other way?

You still didn't answer my question. Do the CURRENT Freebirds endorse your letter that was posted "by the Freebirds".           


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #787 12/24/08 -
Post by: Kermit on December 30, 2008, 06:01:02 PM
From where i sit in Seattle ldstlou it seems from my perspective your only problem is the disemination of the information to people other then the Freebirds!Why?And do correct me if i'm wrong.

Part of it yes. Because my understanding is that there was an agreement to keep the info confidential..and that bothers me.

But the other part is that Kyle wasn't hiding anything that I can see. He was discussing his concerns openly in that forum. Concerns about the Arubans not the members of the Persitence. So why degrade and bastardize the hard work of those members who went out looking for Natalee.

Did Kermit not give Kyle every opportunity to turn everything he had,as well as knew over to the Holloway's as well as the FBI?Did he do it?From what i've read.NO..Correct me if i'm wrong..

You are not wrong.
In fact, I have proof of permission from the family.




the e-mail you posted?

I not only have that, but I have another one from another member of the family hon.
That's why I don't really say mean and attackative things to you as you have towards me, because I know you don't know any better.




Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #787 12/24/08 -
Post by: truthseeker2 on December 30, 2008, 06:01:17 PM



No, Janet, it hasn't.  We still have no idea what was in that trap.  That has been my perspective from the very beginning.  That has not changed.  The idea that I like coming to SM to see the same thing posted over and over and over has not changed either.  I have the same goal as every other person who posts at this site.  I just do not get the same level respect.  And...heaven forbid you decide to make me your next target. Why...I shake in my boots.  But, I guess that is the type of thing that makes it all go 'round for some.

Me, as I have stated before, I am an analyst...and a damn good one.  I still do not see any facts indicating there were human remains in that trap.  Are we to assume that as fact because Kyle says so?  From what I can tell from most of the posts here lately...he is not to be believed.  Which is it?  Is he trutworthy or not?  So for me, until it is proven that human remains were found and that those human remains were Natalee's I will keep looking for answers.

Also, as an analyst, I fully understand contract work and the use/non-use of intellectual property.  Kyle may have disseminated that information within violation of a contract, and therefore his azz would be on the line.  If he is wrong, and he may be wrong, he may never be able to work again in his current capacity.  For whatever reason, he chose to do what he did.  I was not there, so I cannot and do not judge his actions. 

I accept the information regading the contents of the trap for what it is...his opinion...nothing more.  Calling him out on a forum day in and day out has not changed any of the known facts about Natalee.  It's all supposition.  I hope that someone has the where with all to get to the bottom of it, like our FBI.  But, they have had this information for a while now and we have not heard a word from them as to any future investigation.  We are only hearing a request for further investigations from the Netherlands.

And I also agree with whoever posted last night....trying to appeal to someone's faith is a personal thing...people can do that in open forums if they like.  It's not something I would do.

Back to lurking and researching......

I a 98% agree !! 

However it`s my opinion to that this ARE human remains(not the thing that looked like a skull)

(http://i272.photobucket.com/albums/jj176/bastibro/verwant/hip_socket.jpg)
[/quote]

Maybe.  Have you been able to put that to scale with the 'skull'?  That would be interesting to see.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #787 12/24/08 -
Post by: ldstlou on December 30, 2008, 06:02:19 PM
From where i sit in Seattle ldstlou it seems from my perspective your only problem is the disemination of the information to people other then the Freebirds!Why?And do correct me if i'm wrong.

Part of it yes. Because my understanding is that there was an agreement to keep the info confidential..and that bothers me.

But the other part is that Kyle wasn't hiding anything that I can see. He was discussing his concerns openly in that forum. Concerns about the Arubans not the members of the Persitence. So why degrade and bastardize the hard work of those members who went out looking for Natalee.

Did Kermit not give Kyle every opportunity to turn everything he had,as well as knew over to the Holloway's as well as the FBI?Did he do it?From what i've read.NO..Correct me if i'm wrong..

You are not wrong.
In fact, I have proof of permission from the family.




the e-mail you posted?

I not only have that, but I have another one from another member of the family hon.
That's why I don't really say mean and attackative things to you as you have towards me, because I know you don't know any better.




Do the CURRENT Freebirds agree with your actions and statements?


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #787 12/24/08 -
Post by: Kermit on December 30, 2008, 06:02:43 PM
Oh I see what Idstlou is doing.

Gee, in order to do that, why we might have to expose her buddy.

Let me think on it. Better yet, let me sleep on it.

And then I might just expose more of why Isdstlou is trying to protect Kyle.



Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #787 12/24/08 -
Post by: Keepthefaith on December 30, 2008, 06:03:47 PM
Ldstlou.....


Again ldstlou.Did Kyle turn over everything he had pertaining to Natalee's search in Due diligence to the family as well as the FBI?Yes or No?


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #787 12/24/08 -
Post by: jen3560 on December 30, 2008, 06:03:53 PM


I will ask again...do the current Freebirds endorse your actions or views?

What, exactly, are you trying to achieve here by attacking the messenger instead of focusing on the issue?

There were no lies posted here by Kermit.  None.  They were Kyle's own words.

His words and those of Tim Miller's, along with the ROV footage point to the fact there were human remains in that fish cage.

What happened to them?


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #787 12/24/08 -
Post by: texasmom on December 30, 2008, 06:05:23 PM
ldstlou,
Please step back, read what has been said; and review what you are saying.  Please.....and remember what this is all about.  I just think you've lost focus, that's all.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #787 12/24/08 -
Post by: Kermit on December 30, 2008, 06:05:51 PM
ldstlou - I know you are only trying to stand up and protect Kyle and the crew of the Persistence against those who may have questions regarding some of the things Kyle has said, etc.

You are standing up for what you believe in and that is to be commended, however, what if you are wrong?  I'm not saying it's so but what if you and Natalee's family are being lied to?

When things don't seem right, we take a closer look.   Is that so wrong?

Hypothetical:

One of Joran's friends is posting in a private invite only forum where the members sign a confidentiality agreement not to copy and paste info posted in the forum on the outside.  This friend tells of information that would solve the case and put Joran in jail for the rest of his life.
  Do you tell others about this or do you honor the confidentiality agreement?

In the example above would a confidentiality agreement make any difference to you?  It would not to me.

So the FBI were informed, JQK was informed, Beth was informed according to Kermit. I don't see them going after Kyle...so why is Kermit here on SM going after Kyle and the crew of the Persistence?

Kermit informed Beth. Yes.
Kermit is NOT going after Kyle.
Kermit posted the truth to expose the Aruba cover-up




Kermit...come on. IF the Arubans walked away with Natalee...it was Kyle who exposed it not you.

How can Kyle expose something he didn't turn over to the proper authorities,and or family in due diligence????


ummmm...I'll say it again...kermit copied and posted Kyle's info...she reiterated what he said...so where's the cover-up if he said it.


John Silvetti had ONLY Aruban divers at the cage site to retrieve the evidence.
Now why is that Idstlou?



Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #787 12/24/08 -
Post by: ldstlou on December 30, 2008, 06:06:12 PM
Oh I see what Idstlou is doing.

Gee, in order to do that, why we might have to expose her buddy.

Let me think on it. Better yet, let me sleep on it.

And then I might just expose more of why Isdstlou is trying to protect Kyle.



oh boy...can't wait to see this one. You still haven't answered if the CURRENT members of the Freebirds agree with your actions and opinions.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #787 12/24/08 -
Post by: ldstlou on December 30, 2008, 06:06:51 PM
ldstlou - I know you are only trying to stand up and protect Kyle and the crew of the Persistence against those who may have questions regarding some of the things Kyle has said, etc.

You are standing up for what you believe in and that is to be commended, however, what if you are wrong?  I'm not saying it's so but what if you and Natalee's family are being lied to?

When things don't seem right, we take a closer look.   Is that so wrong?

Hypothetical:

One of Joran's friends is posting in a private invite only forum where the members sign a confidentiality agreement not to copy and paste info posted in the forum on the outside.  This friend tells of information that would solve the case and put Joran in jail for the rest of his life.
  Do you tell others about this or do you honor the confidentiality agreement?

In the example above would a confidentiality agreement make any difference to you?  It would not to me.

So the FBI were informed, JQK was informed, Beth was informed according to Kermit. I don't see them going after Kyle...so why is Kermit here on SM going after Kyle and the crew of the Persistence?

Kermit informed Beth. Yes.
Kermit is NOT going after Kyle.
Kermit posted the truth to expose the Aruba cover-up




Kermit...come on. IF the Arubans walked away with Natalee...it was Kyle who exposed it not you.

How can Kyle expose something he didn't turn over to the proper authorities,and or family in due diligence????


ummmm...I'll say it again...kermit copied and posted Kyle's info...she reiterated what he said...so where's the cover-up if he said it.


John Silvetti had ONLY Aruban divers at the cage site to retrieve the evidence.
Now why is that Idstlou?



My understanding Kermit is they had no choice.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #787 12/24/08 -
Post by: Tamikosmom on December 30, 2008, 06:07:05 PM
ldstlou - I know you are only trying to stand up and protect Kyle and the crew of the Persistence against those who may have questions regarding some of the things Kyle has said, etc.

You are standing up for what you believe in and that is to be commended, however, what if you are wrong?  I'm not saying it's so but what if you and Natalee's family are being lied to?

When things don't seem right, we take a closer look.   Is that so wrong?

Hypothetical:

One of Joran's friends is posting in a private invite only forum where the members sign a confidentiality agreement not to copy and paste info posted in the forum on the outside.  This friend tells of information that would solve the case and put Joran in jail for the rest of his life.
  Do you tell others about this or do you honor the confidentiality agreement?

In the example above would a confidentiality agreement make any difference to you?  It would not to me.

So the FBI were informed, JQK was informed, Beth was informed according to Kermit. I don't see them going after Kyle...so why is Kermit here on SM going after Kyle and the crew of the Persistence?

Kermit informed Beth. Yes.
Kermit is NOT going after Kyle.
Kermit posted the truth to expose the Aruba cover-up




Kermit...come on. IF the Arubans walked away with Natalee...it was Kyle who exposed it not you.

How can Kyle expose something he didn't turn over to the proper authorities,and or family in due diligence????

Kyle Kingman did not expose the hoax encompassing the Persistence endeavor.

Rather than immediately sharing with the family and reporting to the FBI his observations and concerns ...  when Kyle returned to the United States ... he shared on a private forum and ... he attempted to make deals with major networks.

Lou ... it was Kermit who exposed the hoax encompassing the Persistence endeavor ... it was the Natalee's Freebirds who exposed the hoax encompassing the Persistence endeavor.

.... AND THE EXPOSURE HAS NOT MADE KYLE KINGMAN A HAPPY CAMPER.

Janet


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #787 12/24/08 -
Post by: bastibro on December 30, 2008, 06:07:06 PM
Klaas

I messed up again.  Please edit my post 490.

Hey ... no Monkey or Freebird was on that ship.

My New Year's resolution is to never never bother you again in regards to editing my posts.  The way I look at it ... I still have a couple of days of grace.

  ::MonkeyHaHa::

Thanks

Janet

Grace is neverending ::MonkeyCool::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #787 12/24/08 -
Post by: jen3560 on December 30, 2008, 06:07:49 PM

You still didn't answer my question. Do the CURRENT Freebirds endorse your letter that was posted "by the Freebirds".           


Let's first get this technically correct.  My letter was posted by Klaas.  Not "by the Freebirds".  My letter was signed by me - not "by the Freebirds".

Now that's straight -
One member didn't want the group's name dragged through all of this by YOU.

Other than that - no problems.

Can you move on now?


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #787 12/24/08 -
Post by: ldstlou on December 30, 2008, 06:09:09 PM


I will ask again...do the current Freebirds endorse your actions or views?

What, exactly, are you trying to achieve here by attacking the messenger instead of focusing on the issue?

There were no lies posted here by Kermit.  None.  They were Kyle's own words.

His words and those of Tim Miller's, along with the ROV footage point to the fact there were human remains in that fish cage.

What happened to them?

No one knows what was in there. That was the whole point. The Arubas took off with the evidence. So why blame the members of the Persitence for that?

And why won't you answer my question. Your letter was posted as a letter from the Freebirds. I respect the Freebirds, I want to know if they endorse your letter...what is the big deal in answering that?


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #787 12/24/08 -
Post by: jen3560 on December 30, 2008, 06:09:37 PM
Thank you for the warm welcome monkeys!

You are all caring and dedicated people - that shows by your continued presence here.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #787 12/24/08 -
Post by: ldstlou on December 30, 2008, 06:10:33 PM

You still didn't answer my question. Do the CURRENT Freebirds endorse your letter that was posted "by the Freebirds".           


Let's first get this technically correct.  My letter was posted by Klaas.  Not "by the Freebirds".  My letter was signed by me - not "by the Freebirds".

Now that's straight -
One member didn't want the group's name dragged through all of this by YOU.

Other than that - no problems.

Can you move on now?

Your letter was posted with a heading that said letter from the Freebirds. I am just asking if they endorsed your letter.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #787 12/24/08 -
Post by: ldstlou on December 30, 2008, 06:11:52 PM

You still didn't answer my question. Do the CURRENT Freebirds endorse your letter that was posted "by the Freebirds".           


Let's first get this technically correct.  My letter was posted by Klaas.  Not "by the Freebirds".  My letter was signed by me - not "by the Freebirds".

Now that's straight -
One member didn't want the group's name dragged through all of this by YOU.

Other than that - no problems.

Can you move on now?

Your letter was posted with a heading that said letter from the Freebirds. I am just asking if they endorsed your letter.

Sent to me by Natalee's Freebirds:

Please feel free (if you'd like) to post this at your board.
 
During the journey of the Persistence to Aruba, Kyle reached out and emailed with us.  During that time, one of the questions posed to him was regarding protocol if/when Natalee's remains were found.
 
Kyle's response was that he was unsure, but felt that would be settled before the search began.
 
The cautions were given to him about the lack of integrity on the part of Aruba's law enforcement, prosecutor's office, and its judiciary.
 
Contact with Kyle continued throughout the duration of the search by the Persistence.
 
Once back home, Kyle asked us for our help.  He was very concerned about the activities that transpired during their search - specifically surrounding the find of the fishing cage and its contents.  Kyle wanted our help in presenting this information in a factual way, to then be given to Natalee's family. 
 
This was March 18, 2008.  At that time, Kyle assured us he had just recently sent the images from the Dec 30th and Jan 7th dives to the FBI, but had never received a response from them.
 
We later found that to be false.
 
Also at that time, Beth's brother saw the images Kyle had shared with us - but none of the detail he shared later.

We compiled the images Kyle presented us, along with his opinions and the facts surrounding the sequence of events regarding that fishing cage.  Kyle stated he would be getting in touch with Beth Holloway.
 
We later found out that never happened.

At this time, Kyle shared with us the broadcast networks he had approached in February, in an attempt to sell these images to the highest bidder.
 
This didn't concern us greatly at that time - as we were under the impression US law enforcement and Natalee's family had already been made aware of their find.
 
Approximately May 2008 Kyle began dodging questions for details (we had asked for names of Aruban police and divers to be included in our documentation of these events), hedging on moving forward with this, and then he completely disappeared from our board.
 
During that time, we learned Kyle had never contacted Beth, or Dave, or the FBI with this information.
 
We put our original plan into motion - that of presenting this information in a clear and concise manner, and we sent it to Beth Holloway.
 
Beth was disturbed, needed time to digest the information, and wanted to share it with someone she trusts.
 
When Tim Miller was returning to Aruba this past fall, Beth gave us permission to release this information publicly.
 
At that point, we gave it to John Kelly, Carmen Adams with the FBI, and got it ready for public consumption.
 
The next step was to publish this information at our blog.
 
One of our members felt we were betraying Kyle in doing so, contacted him, and he re-surfaced at our site with threats of litigation against us - stating this was his "intellectual property" and we could not use it.
 
That of course concerned us greatly - as none of us could afford to be sued.
 
He also stated at that time, Luis Shaefer had just recently sold the rights of the video of these images to a broadcast company for the purposes of a documentary.
 
We contacted legal counsel and were advised to keep our distance from any Persistence crew member, in the face of potential obstruction/accessory charges.
 
At this point, one of our members decided to brace for the possibility of civil litigation, resigned from our membership to protect it from same, and posted what he knows to be factual at SM.
 
Kyle did tell us human remains were found in that fish cage.
 
Kyle did tell us about John Silvetti's intent to open an office on the island of Aruba, to enable him ease in conducting business in South America, and Aruba.
 
Kyle also told us of John's absolute refusal to give that fish cage and its contents any credence - before even it was inspected on Jan 7th.
 
Kyle told us in no uncertain terms that Tim Miller and Dateline were abruptly removed from the Persistence on Dec 30, resulting in only Persistence crew being aboard between that date and the Jan 7 dive of the Arubans.
 
Nothing that was posted at SM by kermit was incorrect, out of context, or in any way false.
 
Regards,
 
Former Natalee's Freebirds Administrator
Natalee and her family deserve justice - and we will not let up until they have it!


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #787 12/24/08 -
Post by: Kermit on December 30, 2008, 06:11:54 PM
Oh I see what Idstlou is doing.

Gee, in order to do that, why we might have to expose her buddy.

Let me think on it. Better yet, let me sleep on it.

And then I might just expose more of why Isdstlou is trying to protect Kyle.



oh boy...can't wait to see this one. You still haven't answered if the CURRENT members of the Freebirds agree with your actions and opinions.

I resigned.

But I know who is telling you what.
So be sure, I'll sleep on it and I might just expose that on New Years eve.



Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #787 12/24/08 -
Post by: Keepthefaith on December 30, 2008, 06:12:13 PM
Ldstlou.....


Again ldstlou.Did Kyle turn over everything he had pertaining to Natalee's search in Due diligence to the family as well as the FBI?Yes or No?

Again.Ldstlou.Don't know if you're seeing it or posting to fast??


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #787 12/24/08 -
Post by: truthseeker2 on December 30, 2008, 06:13:18 PM
Isn't that the point......Truthseeker2  "We still have no idea what was in that trap."

Well....it has been MY point from the very beginning.

We'll never know what is in the trap and why?

Ask Eduardo Mansur.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #787 12/24/08 -
Post by: Keepthefaith on December 30, 2008, 06:13:22 PM
Oh I see what Idstlou is doing.

Gee, in order to do that, why we might have to expose her buddy.

Let me think on it. Better yet, let me sleep on it.

And then I might just expose more of why Isdstlou is trying to protect Kyle.



oh boy...can't wait to see this one. You still haven't answered if the CURRENT members of the Freebirds agree with your actions and opinions.

I resigned.

But I know who is telling you what.
So be sure, I'll sleep on it and I might just expose that on New Years eve.



Kermit... ::MonkeyLaugh:: I'll be here! ::MonkeyDance::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #787 12/24/08 -
Post by: Kermit on December 30, 2008, 06:14:22 PM
ldstlou - I know you are only trying to stand up and protect Kyle and the crew of the Persistence against those who may have questions regarding some of the things Kyle has said, etc.

You are standing up for what you believe in and that is to be commended, however, what if you are wrong?  I'm not saying it's so but what if you and Natalee's family are being lied to?

When things don't seem right, we take a closer look.   Is that so wrong?

Hypothetical:

One of Joran's friends is posting in a private invite only forum where the members sign a confidentiality agreement not to copy and paste info posted in the forum on the outside.  This friend tells of information that would solve the case and put Joran in jail for the rest of his life.
  Do you tell others about this or do you honor the confidentiality agreement?

In the example above would a confidentiality agreement make any difference to you?  It would not to me.

So the FBI were informed, JQK was informed, Beth was informed according to Kermit. I don't see them going after Kyle...so why is Kermit here on SM going after Kyle and the crew of the Persistence?

Kermit informed Beth. Yes.
Kermit is NOT going after Kyle.
Kermit posted the truth to expose the Aruba cover-up




Kermit...come on. IF the Arubans walked away with Natalee...it was Kyle who exposed it not you.

How can Kyle expose something he didn't turn over to the proper authorities,and or family in due diligence????


ummmm...I'll say it again...kermit copied and posted Kyle's info...she reiterated what he said...so where's the cover-up if he said it.


John Silvetti had ONLY Aruban divers at the cage site to retrieve the evidence.
Now why is that Idstlou?



My understanding Kermit is they had no choice.

So they knew it was wrong?



Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #787 12/24/08 -
Post by: ldstlou on December 30, 2008, 06:14:48 PM
ldstlou,
Please step back, read what has been said; and review what you are saying.  Please.....and remember what this is all about.  I just think you've lost focus, that's all.

I am just looking for the truth the same as everyone else.
I find Kermit's actions suspicious. I also find the letter written suspicious. Why say it was sent from the Freebirds if it in fact wasn't? Did they endorse it or not.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #787 12/24/08 -
Post by: Keepthefaith on December 30, 2008, 06:14:54 PM
Isn't that the point......Truthseeker2  "We still have no idea what was in that trap."

Well....it has been MY point from the very beginning.

We'll never know what is in the trap and why?

Ask Eduardo Mansur.

I'd still like to know that as well Truthseeker2 but,maybe Silvetti and the crew have our answer??One would think Kyle would know.He doesn't want to talk for some reason.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #787 12/24/08 -
Post by: Kermit on December 30, 2008, 06:15:38 PM
Oh I see what Idstlou is doing.

Gee, in order to do that, why we might have to expose her buddy.

Let me think on it. Better yet, let me sleep on it.

And then I might just expose more of why Isdstlou is trying to protect Kyle.



oh boy...can't wait to see this one. You still haven't answered if the CURRENT members of the Freebirds agree with your actions and opinions.

I resigned.

But I know who is telling you what.
So be sure, I'll sleep on it and I might just expose that on New Years eve.



Kermit... ::MonkeyLaugh:: I'll be here! ::MonkeyDance::

LOL

Truth can guide, protect and brings freedom
heh heh
it's going to be good.



Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #787 12/24/08 -
Post by: RoxiBalboa on December 30, 2008, 06:15:55 PM
I get chills from most of what I've read. Thanks to the new "free" members for the added information. Who is it we should be contacting to make this an international incident, and get things happening? I will contact anyone, as will the other monkeys to get things happening!

sing-a-long: ring around the rosie.....
are we going in circles????

OT p.s. Janet, I read your New Year's resolutions, tsk tsk, I've saw you ask for a correction. LOL


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #787 12/24/08 -
Post by: ldstlou on December 30, 2008, 06:16:32 PM
Oh I see what Idstlou is doing.

Gee, in order to do that, why we might have to expose her buddy.

Let me think on it. Better yet, let me sleep on it.

And then I might just expose more of why Isdstlou is trying to protect Kyle.



oh boy...can't wait to see this one. You still haven't answered if the CURRENT members of the Freebirds agree with your actions and opinions.

I resigned.

But I know who is telling you what.
So be sure, I'll sleep on it and I might just expose that on New Years eve.



Well let me know who it is too Kermit.
God lawd the dramatics. Just spill what you think you got.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #787 12/24/08 -
Post by: Keepthefaith on December 30, 2008, 06:17:02 PM
ldstlou,
Please step back, read what has been said; and review what you are saying.  Please.....and remember what this is all about.  I just think you've lost focus, that's all.

I am just looking for the truth the same as everyone else.
I find Kermit's actions suspicious. I also find the letter written suspicious. Why say it was sent from the Freebirds if it in fact wasn't? Did they endorse it or not.

Again ldstlou.Did Kyle Kingman mislead The Freebirds,Monkey's,and or anyone else for that matter?


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #787 12/24/08 -
Post by: texasmom on December 30, 2008, 06:17:36 PM
Oh I see what Idstlou is doing.

Gee, in order to do that, why we might have to expose her buddy.

Let me think on it. Better yet, let me sleep on it.

And then I might just expose more of why Isdstlou is trying to protect Kyle.



oh boy...can't wait to see this one. You still haven't answered if the CURRENT members of the Freebirds agree with your actions and opinions.

I resigned.

But I know who is telling you what.
So be sure, I'll sleep on it and I might just expose that on New Years eve.



Kermit,
I wish you would just tell it now.  I typed a whole paragraph as to why I wish you would do it now, but I erased that because I know it would offend someone who has lost focus of what we're here for; so can we please just put it all on the table now....so we can move on to what's important here...Justice for Natalee?


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #787 12/24/08 -
Post by: ldstlou on December 30, 2008, 06:17:43 PM
Ldstlou.....


Again ldstlou.Did Kyle turn over everything he had pertaining to Natalee's search in Due diligence to the family as well as the FBI?Yes or No?

Again.Ldstlou.Don't know if you're seeing it or posting to fast??

this has been asked and answred at good 20 times by now.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #787 12/24/08 -
Post by: Keepthefaith on December 30, 2008, 06:18:46 PM
Ldstlou.....


Again ldstlou.Did Kyle turn over everything he had pertaining to Natalee's search in Due diligence to the family as well as the FBI?Yes or No?

Again.Ldstlou.Don't know if you're seeing it or posting to fast??

this has been asked and answred at good 20 times by now.

Yes or No??Care to answer yourself?


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #787 12/24/08 -
Post by: ldstlou on December 30, 2008, 06:19:28 PM
Oh I see what Idstlou is doing.

Gee, in order to do that, why we might have to expose her buddy.

Let me think on it. Better yet, let me sleep on it.

And then I might just expose more of why Isdstlou is trying to protect Kyle.



oh boy...can't wait to see this one. You still haven't answered if the CURRENT members of the Freebirds agree with your actions and opinions.

I resigned.

But I know who is telling you what.
So be sure, I'll sleep on it and I might just expose that on New Years eve.



Kermit,
I wish you would just tell it now.  I typed a whole paragraph as to why I wish you would do it now, but I erased that because I know it would offend someone who has lost focus of what we're here for; so can we please just put it all on the table now....so we can move on to what's important here...Justice for Natalee?

where supposed to be looking for the truth...so I agree..tell it.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #787 12/24/08 -
Post by: Buckeye on December 30, 2008, 06:19:52 PM

You still didn't answer my question. Do the CURRENT Freebirds endorse your letter that was posted "by the Freebirds".           


Let's first get this technically correct.  My letter was posted by Klaas.  Not "by the Freebirds".  My letter was signed by me - not "by the Freebirds".

Now that's straight -
One member didn't want the group's name dragged through all of this by YOU.

Other than that - no problems.

Can you move on now?

Your letter was posted with a heading that said letter from the Freebirds. I am just asking if they endorsed your letter.

The letter was not the first one sent over by the Freebirds.  My guess is that Klaas recognized the delivery method.  Many people post what the "monkeys" say and it doesn't usually pertain to Red. I don't care if the current hidey hole residents endorse the post.  I believe a former Freebird Adm, with first hand knowledge of the situation, shared her/his knowledge. Could we possibly get past how we found out and just get back to dealing with the info??  sheesh


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #787 12/24/08 -
Post by: Kermit on December 30, 2008, 06:20:02 PM
ldstlou,
Please step back, read what has been said; and review what you are saying.  Please.....and remember what this is all about.  I just think you've lost focus, that's all.

I am just looking for the truth the same as everyone else.
I find Kermit's actions suspicious. I also find the letter written suspicious. Why say it was sent from the Freebirds if it in fact wasn't? Did they endorse it or not.


Idstlou stated: "I am just looking for the truth the same as everyone else.

The ONLY REASON you say you are suspicious of me is because of the false information you are being fed.

Idstlou, I'm not a dummy dog. I can back up what I say.







Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #787 12/24/08 -
Post by: bastibro on December 30, 2008, 06:20:25 PM



No, Janet, it hasn't.  We still have no idea what was in that trap.  That has been my perspective from the very beginning.  That has not changed.  The idea that I like coming to SM to see the same thing posted over and over and over has not changed either.  I have the same goal as every other person who posts at this site.  I just do not get the same level respect.  And...heaven forbid you decide to make me your next target. Why...I shake in my boots.  But, I guess that is the type of thing that makes it all go 'round for some.

Me, as I have stated before, I am an analyst...and a damn good one.  I still do not see any facts indicating there were human remains in that trap.  Are we to assume that as fact because Kyle says so?  From what I can tell from most of the posts here lately...he is not to be believed.  Which is it?  Is he trutworthy or not?  So for me, until it is proven that human remains were found and that those human remains were Natalee's I will keep looking for answers.

Also, as an analyst, I fully understand contract work and the use/non-use of intellectual property.  Kyle may have disseminated that information within violation of a contract, and therefore his azz would be on the line.  If he is wrong, and he may be wrong, he may never be able to work again in his current capacity.  For whatever reason, he chose to do what he did.  I was not there, so I cannot and do not judge his actions. 

I accept the information regading the contents of the trap for what it is...his opinion...nothing more.  Calling him out on a forum day in and day out has not changed any of the known facts about Natalee.  It's all supposition.  I hope that someone has the where with all to get to the bottom of it, like our FBI.  But, they have had this information for a while now and we have not heard a word from them as to any future investigation.  We are only hearing a request for further investigations from the Netherlands.

And I also agree with whoever posted last night....trying to appeal to someone's faith is a personal thing...people can do that in open forums if they like.  It's not something I would do.

Back to lurking and researching......

I a 98% agree !! 

However it`s my opinion to that this ARE human remains(not the thing that looked like a skull)

(http://i272.photobucket.com/albums/jj176/bastibro/verwant/hip_socket.jpg)

Maybe.  Have you been able to put that to scale with the 'skull'?  That would be interesting to see.
[/quote]

Yes, i was searching for reasons to exclude, but came to the conclusion that the size proportionally fits to the cage.

The thing`thought to be a skull` i did exclude. A human skull would take almost 1 third of the cage height.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #787 12/24/08 -
Post by: Rob on December 30, 2008, 06:21:05 PM
Good Evening,

First, I would like to take a second to acknowledge Peaches and her determination to beat cancer. It was one of the bravest battles I have ever witnessed and I learned a lot from her. She will be sorely missed. My thoughts and prayers are with Mr. Peaches and their lovely daughter. I hope that God grants them the strength they will all need over the remainders of their own lives.

God Bless you Peaches and your family, you are in my prayers.

+++++

I have kinda been biting my tongue on the whole Freebird issue. Yes, I was a Freebird too and know them all. They are some of the best of the best. They are some of the most compassionate, caring and kind people I have ever gotten to know. Jen is a real sweetheart that gave so much of herself over the last few years that words can't really express my gratitude for her efforts. She is to be thanked along with everyone else still there and giving so much of themselves.

If they did not have the forum this info would most likely never have been known. So, there is a reason for everything and a cause and goal brought them together. They have remained true to their stated intent and each other.

When evidence of a crime was discovered, they did the right thing - they exposed it. That's what I have come to expect from such a loyal and devoted group. Their devotion to Natalee is unquestionable.

As, I told you a month or so ago, Kermit was always telling the truth. How do I know? I know because I know what makes Kermit tick and got to know her and her values. Those are some of the staunchest values on any board. When you are true to your own beliefs, well, you are never making a mistake.

+++

Wingnut - good to see you again my friend, happy holidays to you and yours'.

Jen I wish you the best no matter where your heart takes you!


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #787 12/24/08 -
Post by: ldstlou on December 30, 2008, 06:21:56 PM
ldstlou,
Please step back, read what has been said; and review what you are saying.  Please.....and remember what this is all about.  I just think you've lost focus, that's all.

I am just looking for the truth the same as everyone else.
I find Kermit's actions suspicious. I also find the letter written suspicious. Why say it was sent from the Freebirds if it in fact wasn't? Did they endorse it or not.


Idstlou stated: "I am just looking for the truth the same as everyone else.

The ONLY REASON you say you are suspicious of me is because of the false information you are being fed.

Idstlou, I'm not a dummy dog. I can back up what I say.







whatever Kermit. The dramatics get old. I am out of here. I can't stand your games anymore. Is this about the truth or your ego needing stroked?


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #787 12/24/08 -
Post by: klaasend on December 30, 2008, 06:23:09 PM
Hello Monekys,

Thank you Klaas for approving my membership.

I am the former Natalee's Freebirds Administrator.

To answer ldstlou - NO, I am not disgruntled.  No, I am no longer a member at that forum.  I resigned today.

That is an outstanding group of people, with hearts of gold.  I admire and respect each and every one of them.

It was merely time for me to move on.  I felt that we had achieved all we could there over the past 2 1/2 years, and all of the Freebirds - former and current - will always be in my heart.

Kermit did the right thing by making this information public at Beth Holloway's request (albeit 2 months after she asked us to do so thanks to the need to avoid litigation).

I just simply couldn't stand by any longer and watch the continued confusion perpetrated by two particular posters here.  Whether it's been unintentional or deliberate - it really needs to stop now.

Wingnut made an excellent point - and I feel it's one that's been largely overlooked - pressure needs to be applied to get the answers as to what happened to the human remains Aruba recovered from that fishing cage.

Monkeys - you all are stellar at banding together and getting action.

The FBI can only do so much - with their limited jurisdiction.  They can speak to and subpoena from the members of the Persistence their statements and video to ascertain what was found.

Then it becomes an international issue.  Our State Department is where the encouragement is needed - to put pressure on the Hague to get to the bottom of this.

But something must be done.  Natalee's family has been through enough, and that they (and Natalee) were treated so shabbily by the one resource they felt they could trust is utterly heart wrenching.

Thank you Monkeys for allowing me to be here - let's help Natalee's family get some justice!

So then you are no longer a Freebird..is that correct? So then to say that your letter is from the "Freebird's"..is that incorrect? Did the current members endorse your letter?

MY MISTAKE - I should have said a former administrator of Freebirds. 


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #787 12/24/08 -
Post by: Kermit on December 30, 2008, 06:23:21 PM
Oh I see what Idstlou is doing.

Gee, in order to do that, why we might have to expose her buddy.

Let me think on it. Better yet, let me sleep on it.

And then I might just expose more of why Isdstlou is trying to protect Kyle.



oh boy...can't wait to see this one. You still haven't answered if the CURRENT members of the Freebirds agree with your actions and opinions.

I resigned.

But I know who is telling you what.
So be sure, I'll sleep on it and I might just expose that on New Years eve.



Kermit,
I wish you would just tell it now.  I typed a whole paragraph as to why I wish you would do it now, but I erased that because I know it would offend someone who has lost focus of what we're here for; so can we please just put it all on the table now....so we can move on to what's important here...Justice for Natalee?

No.

I'll put it all together so it will open everyone's eyes as to why Idstlou is behaving and asking what she is.
Believe me, it's all because of the information she has been fed.

I do not know Idstlou and certainly have no intention to hurt her feelings when I burst the bubble.
That's my disclaimer so she knows ahead of time. She said she wanted to know the truth and she is only getting what someone wants her to know.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #787 12/24/08 -
Post by: Keepthefaith on December 30, 2008, 06:23:43 PM
Ldstlou.....


Again ldstlou.Did Kyle turn over everything he had pertaining to Natalee's search in Due diligence to the family as well as the FBI?Yes or No?

Again.Ldstlou.Don't know if you're seeing it or posting to fast??

this has been asked and answred at good 20 times by now.

Yes or No??Care to answer yourself?

Please answer Yes or No ldstlou.... ::MonkeyConfused::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #787 12/24/08 -
Post by: bastibro on December 30, 2008, 06:25:13 PM
Isn't that the point......Truthseeker2  "We still have no idea what was in that trap."

Well....it has been MY point from the very beginning.

We'll never know what is in the trap and why?

Ask Eduardo Mansur.

Yep, i think it`s something in particulary for the Dutch to go after. I`ll e-mail my summary to Peter de Vries!


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #787 12/24/08 -
Post by: Kermit on December 30, 2008, 06:25:14 PM
ldstlou,
Please step back, read what has been said; and review what you are saying.  Please.....and remember what this is all about.  I just think you've lost focus, that's all.

I am just looking for the truth the same as everyone else.
I find Kermit's actions suspicious. I also find the letter written suspicious. Why say it was sent from the Freebirds if it in fact wasn't? Did they endorse it or not.


Idstlou stated: "I am just looking for the truth the same as everyone else.

The ONLY REASON you say you are suspicious of me is because of the false information you are being fed.

Idstlou, I'm not a dummy dog. I can back up what I say.







whatever Kermit. The dramatics get old. I am out of here. I can't stand your games anymore. Is this about the truth or your ego needing stroked?

Again, with the derogatory comments to me.


Come back tomorrow. I'll have something special just for you!






Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #787 12/24/08 -
Post by: klaasend on December 30, 2008, 06:25:25 PM

You still didn't answer my question. Do the CURRENT Freebirds endorse your letter that was posted "by the Freebirds".           


Let's first get this technically correct.  My letter was posted by Klaas.  Not "by the Freebirds".  My letter was signed by me - not "by the Freebirds".

Now that's straight -
One member didn't want the group's name dragged through all of this by YOU.

Other than that - no problems.

Can you move on now?

Your letter was posted with a heading that said letter from the Freebirds. I am just asking if they endorsed your letter.

The letter was not the first one sent over by the Freebirds.  My guess is that Klaas recognized the delivery method.  Many people post what the "monkeys" say and it doesn't usually pertain to Red. I don't care if the current hidey hole residents endorse the post.  I believe a former Freebird Adm, with first hand knowledge of the situation, shared her/his knowledge. Could we possibly get past how we found out and just get back to dealing with the info??  sheesh

That is exactly the case and for the life of me, I don't understand why that should be an issue.



Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #787 12/24/08 -
Post by: truthseeker2 on December 30, 2008, 06:25:30 PM
Isn't that the point......Truthseeker2  "We still have no idea what was in that trap."

Well....it has been MY point from the very beginning.

We'll never know what is in the trap and why?

Ask Eduardo Mansur.

I'd still like to know that as well Truthseeker2 but,maybe Silvetti and the crew have our answer??One would think Kyle would know.He doesn't want to talk for some reason.

Do any of the monkeys have a way to communicate directly with Jossy?  Maybe we could get him on Dana's show and Dana could ask him about what went on from his and Eduardo's perspective.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #787 12/24/08 -
Post by: Keepthefaith on December 30, 2008, 06:25:55 PM
Oh I see what Idstlou is doing.

Gee, in order to do that, why we might have to expose her buddy.

Let me think on it. Better yet, let me sleep on it.

And then I might just expose more of why Isdstlou is trying to protect Kyle.



oh boy...can't wait to see this one. You still haven't answered if the CURRENT members of the Freebirds agree with your actions and opinions.

I resigned.

But I know who is telling you what.
So be sure, I'll sleep on it and I might just expose that on New Years eve.



Kermit,
I wish you would just tell it now.  I typed a whole paragraph as to why I wish you would do it now, but I erased that because I know it would offend someone who has lost focus of what we're here for; so can we please just put it all on the table now....so we can move on to what's important here...Justice for Natalee?

No.

I'll put it all together so it will open everyone's eyes as to why Idstlou is behaving and asking what she is.
Believe me, it's all because of the information she has been fed.

I do not know Idstlou and certainly have no intention to hurt her feelings when I burst the bubble.
That's my disclaimer so she knows ahead of time. She said she wanted to know the truth and she is only getting what someone wants her to know.


Thanx Kermit.Don't go getting hurt in any parade's before then..... ::cartwheel::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #787 12/24/08 -
Post by: Kermit on December 30, 2008, 06:26:20 PM
Isn't that the point......Truthseeker2  "We still have no idea what was in that trap."

Well....it has been MY point from the very beginning.

We'll never know what is in the trap and why?

Ask Eduardo Mansur.

Now that is someone that Kyle said he was friends with.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #787 12/24/08 -
Post by: Kermit on December 30, 2008, 06:26:53 PM
Oh I see what Idstlou is doing.

Gee, in order to do that, why we might have to expose her buddy.

Let me think on it. Better yet, let me sleep on it.

And then I might just expose more of why Isdstlou is trying to protect Kyle.



oh boy...can't wait to see this one. You still haven't answered if the CURRENT members of the Freebirds agree with your actions and opinions.

I resigned.

But I know who is telling you what.
So be sure, I'll sleep on it and I might just expose that on New Years eve.



Kermit,
I wish you would just tell it now.  I typed a whole paragraph as to why I wish you would do it now, but I erased that because I know it would offend someone who has lost focus of what we're here for; so can we please just put it all on the table now....so we can move on to what's important here...Justice for Natalee?

No.

I'll put it all together so it will open everyone's eyes as to why Idstlou is behaving and asking what she is.
Believe me, it's all because of the information she has been fed.

I do not know Idstlou and certainly have no intention to hurt her feelings when I burst the bubble.
That's my disclaimer so she knows ahead of time. She said she wanted to know the truth and she is only getting what someone wants her to know.


Thanx Kermit.Don't go getting hurt in any parade's before then..... ::cartwheel::

LOL yeah that Thanksgiving parade is a terror!



Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #787 12/24/08 -
Post by: Kermit on December 30, 2008, 06:28:46 PM

You still didn't answer my question. Do the CURRENT Freebirds endorse your letter that was posted "by the Freebirds".           


Let's first get this technically correct.  My letter was posted by Klaas.  Not "by the Freebirds".  My letter was signed by me - not "by the Freebirds".

Now that's straight -
One member didn't want the group's name dragged through all of this by YOU.

Other than that - no problems.

Can you move on now?

Your letter was posted with a heading that said letter from the Freebirds. I am just asking if they endorsed your letter.

The letter was not the first one sent over by the Freebirds.  My guess is that Klaas recognized the delivery method.  Many people post what the "monkeys" say and it doesn't usually pertain to Red. I don't care if the current hidey hole residents endorse the post.  I believe a former Freebird Adm, with first hand knowledge of the situation, shared her/his knowledge. Could we possibly get past how we found out and just get back to dealing with the info??  sheesh

That is exactly the case and for the life of me, I don't understand why that should be an issue.



You'll understand tomorrow.

I know exactly what she is doing, why and with whom.






Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #787 12/24/08 -
Post by: Kermit on December 30, 2008, 06:29:34 PM
Isn't that the point......Truthseeker2  "We still have no idea what was in that trap."

Well....it has been MY point from the very beginning.

We'll never know what is in the trap and why?

Ask Eduardo Mansur.

Yep, i think it`s something in particulary for the Dutch to go after. I`ll e-mail my summary to Peter de Vries!

and maybe Hero Brinkman too!



Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #787 12/24/08 -
Post by: truthseeker2 on December 30, 2008, 06:30:31 PM

Maybe.  Have you been able to put that to scale with the 'skull'?  That would be interesting to see.

Yes, i was searching for reasons to exclude, but came to the conclusion that the size proportionally fits to the cage.

The thing`thought to be a skull` i did exclude. A human skull would take almost 1 third of the cage height.
[/quote]

Okay.  I see what you mean.  I saw some measurements posted here earlier that suggested somehting similar.  So, we may just have a bone or two and some fabric, but not a skull?  (Gosh that sounds morbid)


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #787 12/24/08 -
Post by: jen3560 on December 30, 2008, 06:30:44 PM

You still didn't answer my question. Do the CURRENT Freebirds endorse your letter that was posted "by the Freebirds".           


Let's first get this technically correct.  My letter was posted by Klaas.  Not "by the Freebirds".  My letter was signed by me - not "by the Freebirds".

Now that's straight -
One member didn't want the group's name dragged through all of this by YOU.

Other than that - no problems.

Can you move on now?

Your letter was posted with a heading that said letter from the Freebirds. I am just asking if they endorsed your letter.

The letter was not the first one sent over by the Freebirds.  My guess is that Klaas recognized the delivery method.  Many people post what the "monkeys" say and it doesn't usually pertain to Red. I don't care if the current hidey hole residents endorse the post.  I believe a former Freebird Adm, with first hand knowledge of the situation, shared her/his knowledge. Could we possibly get past how we found out and just get back to dealing with the info??  sheesh

That is exactly the case and for the life of me, I don't understand why that should be an issue.



Buckeye - thank you!

I sent to klaas with the email I always used there, so she would recognize "me" and not think I was some nutball.

Rob - thank you for the kind words.  I know where you heart is, and where it's always been!


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #787 12/24/08 -
Post by: Tamikosmom on December 30, 2008, 06:30:59 PM

John Silvetti had ONLY Aruban divers at the cage site to retrieve the evidence.
Now why is that Idstlou?


My understanding Kermit is they had no choice.


Then it should have been obvious to John S. from the getgo that the outcome was given.  Logic dictates that an endeavor with the enemy who had prevented justice from prevailing since the getgo ... was for naught.  Justice for Natalee Holloway did not stand a chance of prevailing and ... closure for her family did not stand a chance of happening.

So what was John S. motivation in regards to the Persistence undertaking?

Janet

______


Kermit
Re: Natalee Case Discussion #782 12/5/08 -
« Reply #137 on: Today at 04:07:13 PM »


Kyle stated: "John is not a believer in the trap. He took ALE's word as gospel that it wasn't case related, yet never studied the videos or bothered to inquire further. He had plans on doing business with Aruba and in S. America and he didn't want to hurt any feelings by talks hinting at lack of complete trust and friendship."

http://scaredmonkeys.net/index.php?topic=4209.120


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #787 12/24/08 -
Post by: texasmom on December 30, 2008, 06:31:40 PM
Oh I see what Idstlou is doing.

Gee, in order to do that, why we might have to expose her buddy.

Let me think on it. Better yet, let me sleep on it.

And then I might just expose more of why Isdstlou is trying to protect Kyle.



oh boy...can't wait to see this one. You still haven't answered if the CURRENT members of the Freebirds agree with your actions and opinions.

I resigned.

But I know who is telling you what.
So be sure, I'll sleep on it and I might just expose that on New Years eve.



Kermit,
I wish you would just tell it now.  I typed a whole paragraph as to why I wish you would do it now, but I erased that because I know it would offend someone who has lost focus of what we're here for; so can we please just put it all on the table now....so we can move on to what's important here...Justice for Natalee?

No.

I'll put it all together so it will open everyone's eyes as to why Idstlou is behaving and asking what she is.
Believe me, it's all because of the information she has been fed.

I do not know Idstlou and certainly have no intention to hurt her feelings when I burst the bubble.
That's my disclaimer so she knows ahead of time. She said she wanted to know the truth and she is only getting what someone wants her to know.


Thank you Kermit, I'll be here.   ::MonkeyCool::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #787 12/24/08 -
Post by: Keepthefaith on December 30, 2008, 06:31:43 PM
Isn't that the point......Truthseeker2  "We still have no idea what was in that trap."

Well....it has been MY point from the very beginning.

We'll never know what is in the trap and why?

Ask Eduardo Mansur.

Now that is someone that Kyle said he was friends with.


I'm with Truthseeker2 on how did Eduardo come to be on the Persistence?But that is the whole problem with the Persistence Truthseeker2.I think we could have a lot,if not all the answer's if we had the logs from the ship,as well as the protocol.Who was Silvetti,and or schaeffer in communication on the ALE side?Was that Comemencia.The "Dirty Hand"..Just questions Truthseeker2.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #787 12/24/08 -
Post by: wingnut on December 30, 2008, 06:32:17 PM
Good Evening,

First, I would like to take a second to acknowledge Peaches and her determination to beat cancer. It was one of the bravest battles I have ever witnessed and I learned a lot from her. She will be sorely missed. My thoughts and prayers are with Mr. Peaches and their lovely daughter. I hope that God grants them the strength they will all need over the remainders of their own lives.

God Bless you Peaches and your family, you are in my prayers.

+++++

I have kinda been biting my tongue on the whole Freebird issue. Yes, I was a Freebird too and know them all. They are some of the best of the best. They are some of the most compassionate, caring and kind people I have ever gotten to know. Jen is a real sweetheart that gave so much of herself over the last few years that words can't really express my gratitude for her efforts. She is to be thanked along with everyone else still there and giving so much of themselves.

If they did not have the forum this info would most likely never have been known. So, there is a reason for everything and a cause and goal brought them together. They have remained true to their stated intent and each other.

When evidence of a crime was discovered, they did the right thing - they exposed it. That's what I have come to expect from such a loyal and devoted group. Their devotion to Natalee is unquestionable.

As, I told you a month or so ago, Kermit was always telling the truth. How do I know? I know because I know what makes Kermit tick and got to know her and her values. Those are some of the staunchest values on any board. When you are true to your own beliefs, well, you are never making a mistake.

+++

Wingnut - good to see you again my friend, happy holidays to you and yours'.

Jen I wish you the best no matter where your heart takes you!


Hi Rob.  I had wonderful holidays, and hopefully you had the same.  Thank you for standing up for us.  You ARE a Freebird, through and through.  You are the first person who posted "Victim's Advocate" to me, and made me realize that in addition to spouse and parent, I am one of those as well.  :)

ldstlou - or whatever your name is.  Do you want me to validate Jen's letter?  OK - done.  I stand behind anyone who is doing the right thing.  I validate Kermit.  I validate Jen.  I believe that the words "From Natalee's Freebirds" at the top of the post were Klaas' words, not Jen's - but I could be wrong.  Doesn't matter anyway.  Did you bother to read the letter?



Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #787 12/24/08 -
Post by: Kermit on December 30, 2008, 06:32:39 PM
Good Evening,

First, I would like to take a second to acknowledge Peaches and her determination to beat cancer. It was one of the bravest battles I have ever witnessed and I learned a lot from her. She will be sorely missed. My thoughts and prayers are with Mr. Peaches and their lovely daughter. I hope that God grants them the strength they will all need over the remainders of their own lives.

God Bless you Peaches and your family, you are in my prayers.

+++++

I have kinda been biting my tongue on the whole Freebird issue. Yes, I was a Freebird too and know them all. They are some of the best of the best. They are some of the most compassionate, caring and kind people I have ever gotten to know. Jen is a real sweetheart that gave so much of herself over the last few years that words can't really express my gratitude for her efforts. She is to be thanked along with everyone else still there and giving so much of themselves.

If they did not have the forum this info would most likely never have been known. So, there is a reason for everything and a cause and goal brought them together. They have remained true to their stated intent and each other.

When evidence of a crime was discovered, they did the right thing - they exposed it. That's what I have come to expect from such a loyal and devoted group. Their devotion to Natalee is unquestionable.

As, I told you a month or so ago, Kermit was always telling the truth. How do I know? I know because I know what makes Kermit tick and got to know her and her values. Those are some of the staunchest values on any board. When you are true to your own beliefs, well, you are never making a mistake.

+++

Wingnut - good to see you again my friend, happy holidays to you and yours'.

Jen I wish you the best no matter where your heart takes you!

Let me send a  smile to the Freebird buddy.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #787 12/24/08 -
Post by: Buckeye on December 30, 2008, 06:32:41 PM


However it`s my opinion to that this ARE human remains(not the thing that looked like a skull)

(http://i272.photobucket.com/albums/jj176/bastibro/verwant/hip_socket.jpg)

Maybe.  Have you been able to put that to scale with the 'skull'?  That would be interesting to see.
[/quote]

Yes, i was searching for reasons to exclude, but came to the conclusion that the size proportionally fits to the cage.

The thing`thought to be a skull` i did exclude. A human skull would take almost 1 third of the cage height.
[/quote]

Just measured the width of my daughter's skull.  It is 4 1/2 inches.  Height of skull is about 5 inches (without mandible).  If cage is 2.5 feet high (30 inches), the skull would not fill that much.  :smt102


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #787 12/24/08 -
Post by: truthseeker2 on December 30, 2008, 06:33:40 PM
Isn't that the point......Truthseeker2  "We still have no idea what was in that trap."

Well....it has been MY point from the very beginning.

We'll never know what is in the trap and why?

Ask Eduardo Mansur.

Yep, i think it`s something in particulary for the Dutch to go after. I`ll e-mail my summary to Peter de Vries!

Good idea.  If DeVries can get something going then it may help the efforts toward the investigation of Van Der Straaten (Dirty Hand) and Poppa Sloot!


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #787 12/24/08 -
Post by: Keepthefaith on December 30, 2008, 06:33:56 PM
Janet.I thought you were going out.Do you have a laptop??? ::MonkeyLaugh::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #787 12/24/08 -
Post by: jen3560 on December 30, 2008, 06:34:35 PM

Maybe.  Have you been able to put that to scale with the 'skull'?  That would be interesting to see.

Yes, i was searching for reasons to exclude, but came to the conclusion that the size proportionally fits to the cage.

The thing`thought to be a skull` i did exclude. A human skull would take almost 1 third of the cage height.

Okay.  I see what you mean.  I saw some measurements posted here earlier that suggested somehting similar.  So, we may just have a bone or two and some fabric, but not a skull?  (Gosh that sounds morbid)
[/quote]

According to Kyle - to those on board it looked like a skull on the 12/29 dive - but was inconclusive as a skull on the 12/30 dive.

Jan 7 dive - it was only Aruban divers in the water - but one of the Aruban divers also had a camera during this dive.



Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #787 12/24/08 -
Post by: truthseeker2 on December 30, 2008, 06:35:02 PM
Isn't that the point......Truthseeker2  "We still have no idea what was in that trap."

Well....it has been MY point from the very beginning.

We'll never know what is in the trap and why?

Ask Eduardo Mansur.

Now that is someone that Kyle said he was friends with.


Meaning?


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #787 12/24/08 -
Post by: Kermit on December 30, 2008, 06:36:08 PM
Rob

I just wanted to really sincerely thank you for the kind words you posted several threads back about me.
It was very touching to me personally, I read it and it meant a whole lot. Thank you.



Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #787 12/24/08 -
Post by: Keepthefaith on December 30, 2008, 06:36:32 PM

Maybe.  Have you been able to put that to scale with the 'skull'?  That would be interesting to see.

Yes, i was searching for reasons to exclude, but came to the conclusion that the size proportionally fits to the cage.

The thing`thought to be a skull` i did exclude. A human skull would take almost 1 third of the cage height.

Okay.  I see what you mean.  I saw some measurements posted here earlier that suggested somehting similar.  So, we may just have a bone or two and some fabric, but not a skull?  (Gosh that sounds morbid)

According to Kyle - to those on board it looked like a skull on the 12/29 dive - but was inconclusive as a skull on the 12/30 dive.

Jan 7 dive - it was only Aruban divers in the water - but one of the Aruban divers also had a camera during this dive.


[/quote]

So.Was that Eduardo?


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #787 12/24/08 -
Post by: bastibro on December 30, 2008, 06:36:38 PM

Maybe.  Have you been able to put that to scale with the 'skull'?  That would be interesting to see.

Yes, i was searching for reasons to exclude, but came to the conclusion that the size proportionally fits to the cage.

The thing`thought to be a skull` i did exclude. A human skull would take almost 1 third of the cage height.

Okay.  I see what you mean.  I saw some measurements posted here earlier that suggested somehting similar.  So, we may just have a bone or two and some fabric, but not a skull?  (Gosh that sounds morbid)
[/quote]

Yes pfff ::MonkeyHaHa:: it`s all for teh sake of truth.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #787 12/24/08 -
Post by: Kermit on December 30, 2008, 06:36:54 PM
Isn't that the point......Truthseeker2  "We still have no idea what was in that trap."

Well....it has been MY point from the very beginning.

We'll never know what is in the trap and why?

Ask Eduardo Mansur.

Now that is someone that Kyle said he was friends with.


Meaning?

I'd have to re-check but I think he said that he helped them and he trusted him.



Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #787 12/24/08 -
Post by: jen3560 on December 30, 2008, 06:37:57 PM

John Silvetti had ONLY Aruban divers at the cage site to retrieve the evidence.
Now why is that Idstlou?


My understanding Kermit is they had no choice.


Then it should have been obvious to John S. from the getgo that the outcome was given.  Logic dictates that an endeavor with the enemy who had prevented justice from prevailing since the getgo ... was for naught.  Justice for Natalee Holloway did not stand a chance of prevailing and ... closure for her family did not stand a chance of happening.

So what was John S. motivation in regards to the Persistence undertaking?

Janet

______


Kermit
Re: Natalee Case Discussion #782 12/5/08 -
« Reply #137 on: Today at 04:07:13 PM »


Kyle stated: "John is not a believer in the trap. He took ALE's word as gospel that it wasn't case related, yet never studied the videos or bothered to inquire further. He had plans on doing business with Aruba and in S. America and he didn't want to hurt any feelings by talks hinting at lack of complete trust and friendship."

http://scaredmonkeys.net/index.php?topic=4209.120


what lou posted is actually incorrect.  The DID have a choice.  A representative from the FBI could have been aboard the Persistence to retain their initially granted "*******" role in this investigation- instead, the Persistence had a film crew aboard.  Who they (John Silvetti) then proceeded to remove from the boat before the Dec 30 dive, along with Tim Miller.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #787 12/24/08 -
Post by: Magnolia on December 30, 2008, 06:39:24 PM
It is a waste to try to convince idstlou of anything.

She isn't interested in finding Natalee's remains but
she is interested in who she knows.  To some people
being in the inner circle is the most important thing.
Sorta a power trip.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #787 12/24/08 -
Post by: jen3560 on December 30, 2008, 06:39:52 PM

So.Was that Eduardo?

I'm going to doubt that one.  Kyle did not hesitate to talk to us about Eduardo - but clammed up when we asked for names/descriptions of the Aruban "police" divers.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #787 12/24/08 -
Post by: Kermit on December 30, 2008, 06:39:55 PM
Isn't that the point......Truthseeker2  "We still have no idea what was in that trap."

Well....it has been MY point from the very beginning.

We'll never know what is in the trap and why?

Ask Eduardo Mansur.

Now that is someone that Kyle said he was friends with.


I'm with Truthseeker2 on how did Eduardo come to be on the Persistence?But that is the whole problem with the Persistence Truthseeker2.I think we could have a lot,if not all the answer's if we had the logs from the ship,as well as the protocol.Who was Silvetti,and or schaeffer in communication on the ALE side?Was that Comemencia.The "Dirty Hand"..Just questions Truthseeker2.

According to what Kyle said, John Silvetti spoke to Hans Mos.



Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #787 12/24/08 -
Post by: bc73 on December 30, 2008, 06:40:22 PM
Isn't that the point......Truthseeker2  "We still have no idea what was in that trap."

Well....it has been MY point from the very beginning.

We'll never know what is in the trap and why?

Ask Eduardo Mansur.

Now that is someone that Kyle said he was friends with.

Trying my best to stay out of this, but I must say Kermit has been doing an outstanding job of exposing the truth. At the beginning weeks back, there were many,many doubters with Kermit's info. The truth always sets us free, so cut the BS about Kyle and confidentiality, and try and think if it was your child who may or may not be laying in a fish cage, while people tried to sell information to media. Who really gives a crap about Kyle, or anyone in Aruba? Blow the place up,but get Natalee Holloway to her family,where she belongs. Seems to me Kermit could give a crap about anything but Natalee's remains,period. Kermit, great job, and lets keep the focus on the problem-ARUBA!!!


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #787 12/24/08 -
Post by: bleachedblack on December 30, 2008, 06:40:43 PM
Oh I see what Idstlou is doing.

Gee, in order to do that, why we might have to expose her buddy.

Let me think on it. Better yet, let me sleep on it.

And then I might just expose more of why Isdstlou is trying to protect Kyle.



oh boy...can't wait to see this one. You still haven't answered if the CURRENT members of the Freebirds agree with your actions and opinions.

I resigned.

But I know who is telling you what.
So be sure, I'll sleep on it and I might just expose that on New Years eve.



Kermit... ::MonkeyLaugh:: I'll be here! ::MonkeyDance::

LOL

Truth can guide, protect and brings freedom
heh heh
it's going to be good.



I'll be waiting........with a present.....


(http://fohn.net/pictures-of-flies/flies.jpg)


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #787 12/24/08 -
Post by: truthseeker2 on December 30, 2008, 06:40:47 PM


However it`s my opinion to that this ARE human remains(not the thing that looked like a skull)

(http://i272.photobucket.com/albums/jj176/bastibro/verwant/hip_socket.jpg)

Maybe.  Have you been able to put that to scale with the 'skull'?  That would be interesting to see.

Yes, i was searching for reasons to exclude, but came to the conclusion that the size proportionally fits to the cage.

The thing`thought to be a skull` i did exclude. A human skull would take almost 1 third of the cage height.
[/quote]

Just measured the width of my daughter's skull.  It is 4 1/2 inches.  Height of skull is about 5 inches (without mandible).  If cage is 2.5 feet high (30 inches), the skull would not fill that much.  :smt102
[/quote]

You may have said before and I missed it...is your daughter close to Natalee's age or an adult?


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #787 12/24/08 -
Post by: Kermit on December 30, 2008, 06:41:22 PM
It is a waste to try to convince idstlou of anything.

She isn't interested in finding Natalee's remains but
she is interested in who she knows.  To some people
being in the inner circle is the most important thing.
Sorta a power trip.

Have to say I agree with you.
But, I think Klassend and all of the monkeys need the rest of the information.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #787 12/24/08 -
Post by: Kermit on December 30, 2008, 06:42:28 PM
Oh I see what Idstlou is doing.

Gee, in order to do that, why we might have to expose her buddy.

Let me think on it. Better yet, let me sleep on it.

And then I might just expose more of why Isdstlou is trying to protect Kyle.



oh boy...can't wait to see this one. You still haven't answered if the CURRENT members of the Freebirds agree with your actions and opinions.

I resigned.

But I know who is telling you what.
So be sure, I'll sleep on it and I might just expose that on New Years eve.



Kermit... ::MonkeyLaugh:: I'll be here! ::MonkeyDance::

LOL

Truth can guide, protect and brings freedom
heh heh
it's going to be good.



I'll be waiting........with a present.....


(http://fohn.net/pictures-of-flies/flies.jpg)

LOL

oh yeah baby - bursting bubbles and eating flies is my business.



Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #787 12/24/08 -
Post by: Keepthefaith on December 30, 2008, 06:43:02 PM

So.Was that Eduardo?

I'm going to doubt that one.  Kyle did not hesitate to talk to us about Eduardo - but clammed up when we asked for names/descriptions of the Aruban "police" divers.

So Kyle knows who dove on the 7th and won't tell who?Am i correct Jen?TIA.Also thanx for coming to Scared Monkey's ::MonkeyDance::..


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #787 12/24/08 -
Post by: jen3560 on December 30, 2008, 06:43:02 PM


According to what Kyle said, John Silvetti spoke to Hans Mos.



And Dolph Richardson


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #787 12/24/08 -
Post by: Tamikosmom on December 30, 2008, 06:44:04 PM

John Silvetti had ONLY Aruban divers at the cage site to retrieve the evidence.
Now why is that Idstlou?


My understanding Kermit is they had no choice.


Then it should have been obvious to John S. from the getgo that the outcome was given.  Logic dictates that an endeavor with the enemy who had prevented justice from prevailing since the getgo ... was for naught.  Justice for Natalee Holloway did not stand a chance of prevailing and ... closure for her family did not stand a chance of happening.

So what was John S. motivation in regards to the Persistence undertaking?

Janet

______


Kermit
Re: Natalee Case Discussion #782 12/5/08 -
« Reply #137 on: Today at 04:07:13 PM »


Kyle stated: "John is not a believer in the trap. He took ALE's word as gospel that it wasn't case related, yet never studied the videos or bothered to inquire further. He had plans on doing business with Aruba and in S. America and he didn't want to hurt any feelings by talks hinting at lack of complete trust and friendship."

http://scaredmonkeys.net/index.php?topic=4209.120


what lou posted is actually incorrect.  The DID have a choice.  A representative from the FBI could have been aboard the Persistence to retain their initially granted "*******" role in this investigation- instead, the Persistence had a film crew aboard.  Who they (John Silvetti) then proceeded to remove from the boat before the Dec 30 dive, along with Tim Miller.

 ::MonkeyShocked::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #787 12/24/08 -
Post by: ldstlou on December 30, 2008, 06:44:15 PM

You still didn't answer my question. Do the CURRENT Freebirds endorse your letter that was posted "by the Freebirds".           


Let's first get this technically correct.  My letter was posted by Klaas.  Not "by the Freebirds".  My letter was signed by me - not "by the Freebirds".

Now that's straight -
One member didn't want the group's name dragged through all of this by YOU.

Other than that - no problems.

Can you move on now?

Your letter was posted with a heading that said letter from the Freebirds. I am just asking if they endorsed your letter.

The letter was not the first one sent over by the Freebirds.  My guess is that Klaas recognized the delivery method.  Many people post what the "monkeys" say and it doesn't usually pertain to Red. I don't care if the current hidey hole residents endorse the post.  I believe a former Freebird Adm, with first hand knowledge of the situation, shared her/his knowledge. Could we possibly get past how we found out and just get back to dealing with the info??  sheesh

That is exactly the case and for the life of me, I don't understand why that should be an issue.



You'll understand tomorrow.

I know exactly what she is doing, why and with whom.






yet another conspracy? I told you who I have spoken to and why. No deep dark secret to unveil Kermit.

And it IS a big deal to me whether the letter came from the Freebirds or not. I see two "ex" Freebirds making statements, I would like to know if the rest of the Freebirds agree or not. Saying the letter came from the Freebirds is saying they endorse the letter and I wanted to know if they all agreed or not.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #787 12/24/08 -
Post by: truthseeker2 on December 30, 2008, 06:44:47 PM

Ask Eduardo Mansur.

Now that is someone that Kyle said he was friends with.


Meaning?

I'd have to re-check but I think he said that he helped them and he trusted him.



Well, this could be difficult to reconcile, since the consensus is that the Mansurs are trying to help the family and we are to believe that some aboard the Persistence played into a conspiracy to do away with what may, or may not, have been Natalee's remains.

Would Eduardo be involved in the conspiracy too?


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #787 12/24/08 -
Post by: Keepthefaith on December 30, 2008, 06:45:18 PM

John Silvetti had ONLY Aruban divers at the cage site to retrieve the evidence.
Now why is that Idstlou?


My understanding Kermit is they had no choice.


Then it should have been obvious to John S. from the getgo that the outcome was given.  Logic dictates that an endeavor with the enemy who had prevented justice from prevailing since the getgo ... was for naught.  Justice for Natalee Holloway did not stand a chance of prevailing and ... closure for her family did not stand a chance of happening.

So what was John S. motivation in regards to the Persistence undertaking?

Janet

______


Kermit
Re: Natalee Case Discussion #782 12/5/08 -
« Reply #137 on: Today at 04:07:13 PM »


Kyle stated: "John is not a believer in the trap. He took ALE's word as gospel that it wasn't case related, yet never studied the videos or bothered to inquire further. He had plans on doing business with Aruba and in S. America and he didn't want to hurt any feelings by talks hinting at lack of complete trust and friendship."

http://scaredmonkeys.net/index.php?topic=4209.120


what lou posted is actually incorrect.  The DID have a choice.  A representative from the FBI could have been aboard the Persistence to retain their initially granted "*******" role in this investigation- instead, the Persistence had a film crew aboard.  Who they (John Silvetti) then proceeded to remove from the boat before the Dec 30 dive, along with Tim Miller.

 ::MonkeyShocked::

So they chose Money over Justice??


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #787 12/24/08 -
Post by: ldstlou on December 30, 2008, 06:45:39 PM
Oh I see what Idstlou is doing.

Gee, in order to do that, why we might have to expose her buddy.

Let me think on it. Better yet, let me sleep on it.

And then I might just expose more of why Isdstlou is trying to protect Kyle.



oh boy...can't wait to see this one. You still haven't answered if the CURRENT members of the Freebirds agree with your actions and opinions.

I resigned.

But I know who is telling you what.
So be sure, I'll sleep on it and I might just expose that on New Years eve.



Kermit... ::MonkeyLaugh:: I'll be here! ::MonkeyDance::

LOL

Truth can guide, protect and brings freedom
heh heh
it's going to be good.



I'll be waiting........with a present.....


(http://fohn.net/pictures-of-flies/flies.jpg)

LOL

oh yeah baby - bursting bubbles and eating flies is my business.



 ::MonkeyNoNo::

Well...I will be at a New Years Eve party when you unveil your latest.  Enjoy yourself.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #787 12/24/08 -
Post by: Tamikosmom on December 30, 2008, 06:45:48 PM
It is a waste to try to convince idstlou of anything.

She isn't interested in finding Natalee's remains but
she is interested in who she knows.  To some people
being in the inner circle is the most important thing.
Sorta a power trip.

Have to say I agree with you.
But, I think Klassend and all of the monkeys need the rest of the information.


There is more?

  ::MonkeyShocked::

Janet


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #787 12/24/08 -
Post by: wingnut on December 30, 2008, 06:46:12 PM

Trying my best to stay out of this, but I must say Kermit has been doing an outstanding job of exposing the truth. At the beginning weeks back, there were many,many doubters with Kermit's info. The truth always sets us free, so cut the BS about Kyle and confidentiality, and try and think if it was your child who may or may not be laying in a fish cage, while people tried to sell information to media. Who really gives a crap about Kyle, or anyone in Aruba? Blow the place up,but get Natalee Holloway to her family,where she belongs. Seems to me Kermit could give a crap about anything but Natalee's remains,period. Kermit, great job, and lets keep the focus on the problem-ARUBA!!!


And THAT, my friend, is the moral dilemma with which I, personally, was faced. 


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #787 12/24/08 -
Post by: jen3560 on December 30, 2008, 06:46:31 PM

So Kyle knows who dove on the 7th and won't tell who?Am i correct Jen?TIA.Also thanx for coming to Scared Monkey's ::MonkeyDance::..

Thanks for the welcome!

I''m not sure if Kyle knows the identity (names) of the divers from the 7th or not.  Certainly he saw them, in person.  Whether he recognized them from having been on the Persistence on Dec 30th or not is another question. 

When we asked him the names of the divers, he claimed he didn't know, then he said he would check the logs during his upcoming trip to Louisiana (May, I think), and then he came back to say all that info had been "stripped" from the boat by Silvetti.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #787 12/24/08 -
Post by: Kermit on December 30, 2008, 06:47:04 PM
Isn't that the point......Truthseeker2  "We still have no idea what was in that trap."

Well....it has been MY point from the very beginning.

We'll never know what is in the trap and why?

Ask Eduardo Mansur.

Now that is someone that Kyle said he was friends with.

Trying my best to stay out of this, but I must say Kermit has been doing an outstanding job of exposing the truth. At the beginning weeks back, there were many,many doubters with Kermit's info. The truth always sets us free, so cut the BS about Kyle and confidentiality, and try and think if it was your child who may or may not be laying in a fish cage, while people tried to sell information to media. Who really gives a crap about Kyle, or anyone in Aruba? Blow the place up,but get Natalee Holloway to her family,where she belongs. Seems to me Kermit could give a crap about anything but Natalee's remains,period. Kermit, great job, and lets keep the focus on the problem-ARUBA!!!


Only by everyone knowing the truth are we ever going to get those responsible to let Natalee come home.

I think we all want Aruba to send NATALEE HOME TO HER PARENTS! NOW!



Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #787 12/24/08 -
Post by: ldstlou on December 30, 2008, 06:47:18 PM

John Silvetti had ONLY Aruban divers at the cage site to retrieve the evidence.
Now why is that Idstlou?


My understanding Kermit is they had no choice.


Then it should have been obvious to John S. from the getgo that the outcome was given.  Logic dictates that an endeavor with the enemy who had prevented justice from prevailing since the getgo ... was for naught.  Justice for Natalee Holloway did not stand a chance of prevailing and ... closure for her family did not stand a chance of happening.

So what was John S. motivation in regards to the Persistence undertaking?

Janet

______


Kermit
Re: Natalee Case Discussion #782 12/5/08 -
« Reply #137 on: Today at 04:07:13 PM »


Kyle stated: "John is not a believer in the trap. He took ALE's word as gospel that it wasn't case related, yet never studied the videos or bothered to inquire further. He had plans on doing business with Aruba and in S. America and he didn't want to hurt any feelings by talks hinting at lack of complete trust and friendship."

http://scaredmonkeys.net/index.php?topic=4209.120


what lou posted is actually incorrect.  The DID have a choice.  A representative from the FBI could have been aboard the Persistence to retain their initially granted "*******" role in this investigation- instead, the Persistence had a film crew aboard.  Who they (John Silvetti) then proceeded to remove from the boat before the Dec 30 dive, along with Tim Miller.

 ::MonkeyShocked::

So they chose Money over Justice??

No, they DIDN'T have a choice...as we learned before..FBI were there just as observers, they have no power over the Arubans while in Aruban territory,.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #787 12/24/08 -
Post by: Magnolia on December 30, 2008, 06:48:07 PM
It is a waste to try to convince idstlou of anything.

She isn't interested in finding Natalee's remains but
she is interested in who she knows.  To some people
being in the inner circle is the most important thing.
Sorta a power trip.

Have to say I agree with you.
But, I think Klassend and all of the monkeys need the rest of the information.


I think I need the information, Kermit. ::MonkeyCool::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #787 12/24/08 -
Post by: Kermit on December 30, 2008, 06:48:35 PM

So Kyle knows who dove on the 7th and won't tell who?Am i correct Jen?TIA.Also thanx for coming to Scared Monkey's ::MonkeyDance::..

Thanks for the welcome!

I''m not sure if Kyle knows the identity (names) of the divers from the 7th or not.  Certainly he saw them, in person.  Whether he recognized them from having been on the Persistence on Dec 30th or not is another question. 

When we asked him the names of the divers, he claimed he didn't know, then he said he would check the logs during his upcoming trip to Louisiana (May, I think), and then he came back to say all that info had been "stripped" from the boat by Silvetti.

Jen you are one hell of a lady
My respect to you, always.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #787 12/24/08 -
Post by: jen3560 on December 30, 2008, 06:49:02 PM




what lou posted is actually incorrect.  The DID have a choice.  A representative from the FBI could have been aboard the Persistence to retain their initially granted "*******" role in this investigation- instead, the Persistence had a film crew aboard.  Who they (John Silvetti) then proceeded to remove from the boat before the Dec 30 dive, along with Tim Miller.
[/quote]

Whoopsie!  I have to make this correction.  They were removed on Dec 30th AFTER the dive, not before it.

Sorry.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #787 12/24/08 -
Post by: Keepthefaith on December 30, 2008, 06:49:07 PM

So Kyle knows who dove on the 7th and won't tell who?Am i correct Jen?TIA.Also thanx for coming to Scared Monkey's ::MonkeyDance::..

Thanks for the welcome!

I''m not sure if Kyle knows the identity (names) of the divers from the 7th or not.  Certainly he saw them, in person.  Whether he recognized them from having been on the Persistence on Dec 30th or not is another question. 

When we asked him the names of the divers, he claimed he didn't know, then he said he would check the logs during his upcoming trip to Louisiana (May, I think), and then he came back to say all that info had been "stripped" from the boat by Silvetti.

OK.So Silvetti was talking with Mos as well as Richardson.Comemencia was on the boat.Which days.ONLY IF WE HAD THE LOGS.... ::MonkeyNoNo::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #787 12/24/08 -
Post by: Kermit on December 30, 2008, 06:49:29 PM
It is a waste to try to convince idstlou of anything.

She isn't interested in finding Natalee's remains but
she is interested in who she knows.  To some people
being in the inner circle is the most important thing.
Sorta a power trip.

Have to say I agree with you.
But, I think Klassend and all of the monkeys need the rest of the information.


I think I need the information, Kermit. ::MonkeyCool::

And I think you deserve it.
(I mean that in a nice way)
Deserve as in the truth needs to come out of why and what is going on by certain individuals.



Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #787 12/24/08 -
Post by: texasmom on December 30, 2008, 06:49:48 PM
Isn't that the point......Truthseeker2  "We still have no idea what was in that trap."

Well....it has been MY point from the very beginning.

We'll never know what is in the trap and why?

Ask Eduardo Mansur.

Now that is someone that Kyle said he was friends with.

Trying my best to stay out of this, but I must say Kermit has been doing an outstanding job of exposing the truth. At the beginning weeks back, there were many,many doubters with Kermit's info. The truth always sets us free, so cut the BS about Kyle and confidentiality, and try and think if it was your child who may or may not be laying in a fish cage, while people tried to sell information to media. Who really gives a crap about Kyle, or anyone in Aruba? Blow the place up,but get Natalee Holloway to her family,where she belongs. Seems to me Kermit could give a crap about anything but Natalee's remains,period. Kermit, great job, and lets keep the focus on the problem-ARUBA!!!


Only by everyone knowing the truth are we ever going to get those responsible to let Natalee come home.

I think we all want Aruba to send NATALEE HOME TO HER PARENTS! NOW!



YES!!!!!!


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #787 12/24/08 -
Post by: Kermit on December 30, 2008, 06:50:36 PM

So Kyle knows who dove on the 7th and won't tell who?Am i correct Jen?TIA.Also thanx for coming to Scared Monkey's ::MonkeyDance::..

Thanks for the welcome!

I''m not sure if Kyle knows the identity (names) of the divers from the 7th or not.  Certainly he saw them, in person.  Whether he recognized them from having been on the Persistence on Dec 30th or not is another question. 

When we asked him the names of the divers, he claimed he didn't know, then he said he would check the logs during his upcoming trip to Louisiana (May, I think), and then he came back to say all that info had been "stripped" from the boat by Silvetti.

OK.So Silvetti was talking with Mos as well as Richardson.Comemencia was on the boat.Which days.ONLY IF WE HAD THE LOGS.... ::MonkeyNoNo::

According to Kyle John Silvetti took the logs off the ship when it returned to Louisisana. Only 2 people knew where they were and Kyle was not one of them.



Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #787 12/24/08 -
Post by: Buckeye on December 30, 2008, 06:51:44 PM


However it`s my opinion to that this ARE human remains(not the thing that looked like a skull)

(http://i272.photobucket.com/albums/jj176/bastibro/verwant/hip_socket.jpg)

Maybe.  Have you been able to put that to scale with the 'skull'?  That would be interesting to see.

Yes, i was searching for reasons to exclude, but came to the conclusion that the size proportionally fits to the cage.

The thing`thought to be a skull` i did exclude. A human skull would take almost 1 third of the cage height.

Just measured the width of my daughter's skull.  It is 4 1/2 inches.  Height of skull is about 5 inches (without mandible).  If cage is 2.5 feet high (30 inches), the skull would not fill that much.  :smt102
[/quote]

You may have said before and I missed it...is your daughter close to Natalee's age or an adult?
[/quote]

My daughter is 30, 5 feet tall and 105 pounds.  My measurements weren't much different....and I'm a little older...and yes..larger.....lol


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #787 12/24/08 -
Post by: jen3560 on December 30, 2008, 06:52:00 PM

Trying my best to stay out of this, but I must say Kermit has been doing an outstanding job of exposing the truth. At the beginning weeks back, there were many,many doubters with Kermit's info. The truth always sets us free, so cut the BS about Kyle and confidentiality, and try and think if it was your child who may or may not be laying in a fish cage, while people tried to sell information to media. Who really gives a crap about Kyle, or anyone in Aruba? Blow the place up,but get Natalee Holloway to her family,where she belongs. Seems to me Kermit could give a crap about anything but Natalee's remains,period. Kermit, great job, and lets keep the focus on the problem-ARUBA!!!


And THAT, my friend, is the moral dilemma with which I, personally, was faced. 

It hurt us all.  A lot.  I know the pains you personally went thru with it.  Love you dear!


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #787 12/24/08 -
Post by: wingnut on December 30, 2008, 06:52:16 PM
Hello Monekys,

Thank you Klaas for approving my membership.

I am the former Natalee's Freebirds Administrator.

To answer ldstlou - NO, I am not disgruntled.  No, I am no longer a member at that forum.  I resigned today.

That is an outstanding group of people, with hearts of gold.  I admire and respect each and every one of them.

It was merely time for me to move on.  I felt that we had achieved all we could there over the past 2 1/2 years, and all of the Freebirds - former and current - will always be in my heart.

Kermit did the right thing by making this information public at Beth Holloway's request (albeit 2 months after she asked us to do so thanks to the need to avoid litigation).

I just simply couldn't stand by any longer and watch the continued confusion perpetrated by two particular posters here.  Whether it's been unintentional or deliberate - it really needs to stop now.

Wingnut made an excellent point - and I feel it's one that's been largely overlooked - pressure needs to be applied to get the answers as to what happened to the human remains Aruba recovered from that fishing cage.

Monkeys - you all are stellar at banding together and getting action.

The FBI can only do so much - with their limited jurisdiction.  They can speak to and subpoena from the members of the Persistence their statements and video to ascertain what was found.

Then it becomes an international issue.  Our State Department is where the encouragement is needed - to put pressure on the Hague to get to the bottom of this.

But something must be done.  Natalee's family has been through enough, and that they (and Natalee) were treated so shabbily by the one resource they felt they could trust is utterly heart wrenching.

Thank you Monkeys for allowing me to be here - let's help Natalee's family get some justice!

So then you are no longer a Freebird..is that correct? So then to say that your letter is from the "Freebird's"..is that incorrect? Did the current members endorse your letter?

MY MISTAKE - I should have said a former administrator of Freebirds. 


BUMP for ldstlou


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #787 12/24/08 -
Post by: Kermit on December 30, 2008, 06:52:40 PM




what lou posted is actually incorrect.  The DID have a choice.  A representative from the FBI could have been aboard the Persistence to retain their initially granted "*******" role in this investigation- instead, the Persistence had a film crew aboard.  Who they (John Silvetti) then proceeded to remove from the boat before the Dec 30 dive, along with Tim Miller.

Whoopsie!  I have to make this correction.  They were removed on Dec 30th AFTER the dive, not before it.

Sorry.
[/quote]

Also Kyle stated I think here at SM that John did not get the "credit he deserved" in the Dateline show airing.

I'm not sure what kind of credit John was expecting.





Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #787 12/24/08 -
Post by: Tamikosmom on December 30, 2008, 06:52:53 PM

John Silvetti had ONLY Aruban divers at the cage site to retrieve the evidence.
Now why is that Idstlou?


My understanding Kermit is they had no choice.


Then it should have been obvious to John S. from the getgo that the outcome was given.  Logic dictates that an endeavor with the enemy who had prevented justice from prevailing since the getgo ... was for naught.  Justice for Natalee Holloway did not stand a chance of prevailing and ... closure for her family did not stand a chance of happening.

So what was John S. motivation in regards to the Persistence undertaking?

Janet

______


Kermit
Re: Natalee Case Discussion #782 12/5/08 -
« Reply #137 on: Today at 04:07:13 PM »


Kyle stated: "John is not a believer in the trap. He took ALE's word as gospel that it wasn't case related, yet never studied the videos or bothered to inquire further. He had plans on doing business with Aruba and in S. America and he didn't want to hurt any feelings by talks hinting at lack of complete trust and friendship."

http://scaredmonkeys.net/index.php?topic=4209.120


what lou posted is actually incorrect.  The DID have a choice.  A representative from the FBI could have been aboard the Persistence to retain their initially granted "*******" role in this investigation- instead, the Persistence had a film crew aboard.  Who they (John Silvetti) then proceeded to remove from the boat before the Dec 30 dive, along with Tim Miller.

 ::MonkeyShocked::

So they chose Money over Justice??

No, they DIDN'T have a choice...as we learned before..FBI were there just as observers, they have no power over the Arubans while in Aruban territory,.

However ... logic dictates that consider the undertaking was a joint venture with the Arubans ... who have been behind the coverup that has prevented justice from prevailing for for Natalee Holloway since the getgo ... John S. would have insisted that FBI agents were present as observers when it came time for the retrieval and the chain of custody of the contents of the cage/trap.

Janet
__________

ocean exploration (Kyle)
Re: Natalee Case Discussion #744 3/19 -
« Reply #201 on: March 19, 2008, 08:21:47 PM »


We had little option other than to have the Aruban dive division recover the samples and bring them back under their care.  Remember we are Americans working in Aruban waters, subject to their laws, invitation, and blessing.  Our hands are tied for the most part. I personally was extremely uncomfortable with the chain of custody, being that we weren't a part of it, but I was powerless to do anything about it.   The samples were photographed in detail by one Aruban diver and the other two investigated the contents of the trap, the dimensions, the rigging, and what surrounded the trap.  From the video, it looked like they did a diligent and careful job with the samples and the underwater photography.  I don't know who has these pictures, but I must assume ALE.

http://scaredmonkeys.net/index.php?topic=2721.msg366857#msg366857
 


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #787 12/24/08 -
Post by: Keepthefaith on December 30, 2008, 06:52:57 PM

So Kyle knows who dove on the 7th and won't tell who?Am i correct Jen?TIA.Also thanx for coming to Scared Monkey's ::MonkeyDance::..

Thanks for the welcome!

I''m not sure if Kyle knows the identity (names) of the divers from the 7th or not.  Certainly he saw them, in person.  Whether he recognized them from having been on the Persistence on Dec 30th or not is another question. 

When we asked him the names of the divers, he claimed he didn't know, then he said he would check the logs during his upcoming trip to Louisiana (May, I think), and then he came back to say all that info had been "stripped" from the boat by Silvetti.

OK.So Silvetti was talking with Mos as well as Richardson.Comemencia was on the boat.Which days.ONLY IF WE HAD THE LOGS.... ::MonkeyNoNo::

According to Kyle John Silvetti took the logs off the ship when it returned to Louisisana. Only 2 people knew where they were and Kyle was not one of them.



Where are the logs Mr. Silvetti??Monkey's want to know who was on that boat.When and why???When and whom called the ALE to come out when they did?Mr.Silvetti?Monkey's would like to know... ::MonkeyCool::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #787 12/24/08 -
Post by: wreck on December 30, 2008, 06:53:20 PM
I'm 10 pages behind, but need to jump in as I just saw the "Freebirds Letter". I think some apologies are due by some "old members" here! One of my best friend's twin brother was shot by a robber in his own driveway last night here in Dallas. Thank God, he will survive with a broken rib, torn bicep and some minor internal injuries. I will try to catch up!

Once Again, THANK-YOU KERMIT!!!


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #787 12/24/08 -
Post by: Kermit on December 30, 2008, 06:53:51 PM
I'll be back later.

Gonna go work on that interesting reveal.



Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #787 12/24/08 -
Post by: jen3560 on December 30, 2008, 06:53:53 PM

John Silvetti had ONLY Aruban divers at the cage site to retrieve the evidence.
Now why is that Idstlou?


My understanding Kermit is they had no choice.


Then it should have been obvious to John S. from the getgo that the outcome was given.  Logic dictates that an endeavor with the enemy who had prevented justice from prevailing since the getgo ... was for naught.  Justice for Natalee Holloway did not stand a chance of prevailing and ... closure for her family did not stand a chance of happening.

So what was John S. motivation in regards to the Persistence undertaking?

Janet

______


Kermit
Re: Natalee Case Discussion #782 12/5/08 -
« Reply #137 on: Today at 04:07:13 PM »


Kyle stated: "John is not a believer in the trap. He took ALE's word as gospel that it wasn't case related, yet never studied the videos or bothered to inquire further. He had plans on doing business with Aruba and in S. America and he didn't want to hurt any feelings by talks hinting at lack of complete trust and friendship."

http://scaredmonkeys.net/index.php?topic=4209.120


what lou posted is actually incorrect.  The DID have a choice.  A representative from the FBI could have been aboard the Persistence to retain their initially granted "*******" role in this investigation- instead, the Persistence had a film crew aboard.  Who they (John Silvetti) then proceeded to remove from the boat before the Dec 30 dive, along with Tim Miller.

 ::MonkeyShocked::

So they chose Money over Justice??

No, they DIDN'T have a choice...as we learned before..FBI were there just as observers, they have no power over the Arubans while in Aruban territory,.

Maybe re-read my post?  that's exactly what I said.  FBI has an ******* role - Persistence could have had them aboard to do just that.

Then maybe Natalee's family could have been able to bring her home.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #787 12/24/08 -
Post by: jen3560 on December 30, 2008, 06:55:29 PM


Jen you are one hell of a lady
My respect to you, always.


Thank you, my friend.

And mine to you, always!


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #787 12/24/08 -
Post by: bastibro on December 30, 2008, 06:56:10 PM


However it`s my opinion to that this ARE human remains(not the thing that looked like a skull)

(http://i272.photobucket.com/albums/jj176/bastibro/verwant/hip_socket.jpg)

Maybe.  Have you been able to put that to scale with the 'skull'?  That would be interesting to see.

Yes, i was searching for reasons to exclude, but came to the conclusion that the size proportionally fits to the cage.

The thing`thought to be a skull` i did exclude. A human skull would take almost 1 third of the cage height.

Just measured the width of my daughter's skull.  It is 4 1/2 inches.  Height of skull is about 5 inches (without mandible).  If cage is 2.5 feet high (30 inches), the skull would not fill that much.  :smt102
[/quote]

You may have said before and I missed it...is your daughter close to Natalee's age or an adult?
[/quote]

That quote is not mine. I only have sons ::MonkeyWink::

The skull in the cage is around 4.5 inches. Thats way to small for a skull, even without mandible.

The height of a caucasian human skull, without mandible would be around 6.3 inches.

When you look at the image, knowing the measurements of the cage, it`s not in scale at all IMHO.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #787 12/24/08 -
Post by: Kermit on December 30, 2008, 06:56:34 PM
I'm 10 pages behind, but need to jump in as I just saw the "Freebirds Letter". I think some apologies are due by some "old members" here! One of my best friend's twin brother was shot by a robber in his own driveway last night here in Dallas. Thank God, he will survive with a broken rib, torn bicep and some minor internal injuries. I will try to catch up!

Once Again, THANK-YOU KERMIT!!!

oh wreck that is horrible.
Thank you for the thank you. No need. I knew many times you were right on, but I could not say anything to you. But just letting you know, you're thinking is right on.
Hope your friend gets better soon.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #787 12/24/08 -
Post by: Helen Back on December 30, 2008, 06:56:42 PM

You still didn't answer my question. Do the CURRENT Freebirds endorse your letter that was posted "by the Freebirds".           


Let's first get this technically correct.  My letter was posted by Klaas.  Not "by the Freebirds".  My letter was signed by me - not "by the Freebirds".

Now that's straight -
One member didn't want the group's name dragged through all of this by YOU.

Other than that - no problems.

Can you move on now?

Your letter was posted with a heading that said letter from the Freebirds. I am just asking if they endorsed your letter.

The letter was not the first one sent over by the Freebirds.  My guess is that Klaas recognized the delivery method.  Many people post what the "monkeys" say and it doesn't usually pertain to Red. I don't care if the current hidey hole residents endorse the post.  I believe a former Freebird Adm, with first hand knowledge of the situation, shared her/his knowledge. Could we possibly get past how we found out and just get back to dealing with the info??  sheesh

That is exactly the case and for the life of me, I don't understand why that should be an issue.

Just had to jump in here to say this was easy to see by anyone who read the post, Klass. 

I just have to say that I haven't posted much lately cuz it's been a free for all sometimes, and I typically stand clear of "bar room brawls".  I'm just smart like that, and it's how I got to be so old. ::MonkeyCool::

I have to say thanks to all the monkeys WORLD WIDE who continue to love and support Natalee and her family.  If not for the dedication of so many, and the courage to tell the truth, this travesty would have been covered up a thousand times.........but it won't happen here.  Thank God.

I am so thankful for Kermit, Wingnut, and Jen, and everyone here who stands with the girl.  If one of my children were missing, I would pray for the help of a group like this one.

I say Aruba has had more than enough time to pull together an investigation, and the KLPD had their chance at integrity, but chose to participate in the cover up.   There were not enough members of the Dutch Parliament who were ready to stand in their integrity and call for an honest investigation.  Help from the Dutch is not on the way.  Natalee and her family deserve for the truth to be told and I say it's long past time.  There's nothing to lose, at this point, by telling the truth, and there's video evidence of the continuing Aruban cover up.  It's time to show it to the world, and I hope JQK and PRdV do it now.   

Thanks to all the monkeys, for your steadfast faith and commitment.

Happy Trails to our dearest Peaches, until we meet again.

Justice for Natalee in 2009!





Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #787 12/24/08 -
Post by: texasmom on December 30, 2008, 06:57:33 PM
I'm 10 pages behind, but need to jump in as I just saw the "Freebirds Letter". I think some apologies are due by some "old members" here! One of my best friend's twin brother was shot by a robber in his own driveway last night here in Dallas. Thank God, he will survive with a broken rib, torn bicep and some minor internal injuries. I will try to catch up!

Once Again, THANK-YOU KERMIT!!!

I started to ask earlier...where is wreck?

I'm so sorry to hear about your friends brother, but am very relieved that he will be o.k.

and I agree THANK YOU KERMIT!!!!!  And wingnut and jen!!!!!!!


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #787 12/24/08 -
Post by: bastibro on December 30, 2008, 06:59:36 PM


However it`s my opinion to that this ARE human remains(not the thing that looked like a skull)

(http://i272.photobucket.com/albums/jj176/bastibro/verwant/hip_socket.jpg)

Maybe.  Have you been able to put that to scale with the 'skull'?  That would be interesting to see.

Yes, i was searching for reasons to exclude, but came to the conclusion that the size proportionally fits to the cage.

The thing`thought to be a skull` i did exclude. A human skull would take almost 1 third of the cage height.

Just measured the width of my daughter's skull.  It is 4 1/2 inches.  Height of skull is about 5 inches (without mandible).  If cage is 2.5 feet high (30 inches), the skull would not fill that much.  :smt102

You may have said before and I missed it...is your daughter close to Natalee's age or an adult?
[/quote]

That quote is not mine. I only have sons ::MonkeyWink::

The skull in the cage is around 4.5 inches. Thats way to small for a skull, even without mandible.

The height of a caucasian human skull, without mandible would be around 6.3 inches.

When you look at the image, knowing the measurements of the cage, it`s not in scale at all IMHO.

[/quote]

(http://i272.photobucket.com/albums/jj176/bastibro/verwant/2345841784_52614dbecb_ocopy.jpg)


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #787 12/24/08 -
Post by: Tamikosmom on December 30, 2008, 06:59:44 PM

Also Kyle stated I think here at SM that John did not get the "credit he deserved" in the Dateline show airing.

I'm not sure what kind of credit John was expecting.



oceanexploration
Re: Ocean Search - Aruba - December 2007
« Reply #139 on: February 23, 2008, 11:03:29 PM »


My main regret with the broadcast is John Silvetti not getting the credit he was due.  John's the owner of the Persistence, owner of Marine Surveys LLC, and the field project manager of the search. 

Regardless how good of a production it was - Generally speaking, there should never be a broadcast giving details about an active investigation.  When the investigation is complete and no longer potentially sensitive to either the case, victims family, or suspect (s), then sure... why not broadcast it.  It is irresponsible and potentially damaging to do what they did (broadcasting the show while the search is still active) and they broke their agreement with Tim and John to make this production.

http://scaredmonkeys.net/index.php?topic=2438.msg354749;topicseen#msg354749


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #787 12/24/08 -
Post by: texasmom on December 30, 2008, 07:04:25 PM
Just a reminder for those who wanted to view it and missed it.  E! will be showing the News Special "The Final Hours of Natalee Holloway" again at midnight tonight my time which is Central.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #787 12/24/08 -
Post by: Buckeye on December 30, 2008, 07:09:06 PM


However it`s my opinion to that this ARE human remains(not the thing that looked like a skull)

(http://i272.photobucket.com/albums/jj176/bastibro/verwant/hip_socket.jpg)

Maybe.  Have you been able to put that to scale with the 'skull'?  That would be interesting to see.

Yes, i was searching for reasons to exclude, but came to the conclusion that the size proportionally fits to the cage.

The thing`thought to be a skull` i did exclude. A human skull would take almost 1 third of the cage height.

Just measured the width of my daughter's skull.  It is 4 1/2 inches.  Height of skull is about 5 inches (without mandible).  If cage is 2.5 feet high (30 inches), the skull would not fill that much.  :smt102

You may have said before and I missed it...is your daughter close to Natalee's age or an adult?
[/quote]

That quote is not mine. I only have sons ::MonkeyWink::

The skull in the cage is around 4.5 inches. Thats way to small for a skull, even without mandible.

The height of a caucasian human skull, without mandible would be around 6.3 inches.

When you look at the image, knowing the measurements of the cage, it`s not in scale at all IMHO.

[/quote]

In metric:

http://www.donsmaps.com/images9/kostenkifig1415.jpg


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #787 12/24/08 -
Post by: truthseeker2 on December 30, 2008, 07:15:40 PM


However it`s my opinion to that this ARE human remains(not the thing that looked like a skull)

(http://i272.photobucket.com/albums/jj176/bastibro/verwant/hip_socket.jpg)

Maybe.  Have you been able to put that to scale with the 'skull'?  That would be interesting to see.

Yes, i was searching for reasons to exclude, but came to the conclusion that the size proportionally fits to the cage.

The thing`thought to be a skull` i did exclude. A human skull would take almost 1 third of the cage height.

Just measured the width of my daughter's skull.  It is 4 1/2 inches.  Height of skull is about 5 inches (without mandible).  If cage is 2.5 feet high (30 inches), the skull would not fill that much.  :smt102

You may have said before and I missed it...is your daughter close to Natalee's age or an adult?

That quote is not mine. I only have sons ::MonkeyWink::

The skull in the cage is around 4.5 inches. Thats way to small for a skull, even without mandible.

The height of a caucasian human skull, without mandible would be around 6.3 inches.

When you look at the image, knowing the measurements of the cage, it`s not in scale at all IMHO.

[/quote]

(http://i272.photobucket.com/albums/jj176/bastibro/verwant/2345841784_52614dbecb_ocopy.jpg)
[/quote]

From the angle of the ROV it's hard to tell.  But, if the height of the trap is 2 1/2 ft, then that does make the skull look awfully small.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #787 12/24/08 -
Post by: klaasend on December 30, 2008, 07:17:12 PM
Just a thought, Kyle is the one who suggested the size of the trap.  We really don't know for sure the exact size except from what he has said.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #787 12/24/08 -
Post by: anidac on December 30, 2008, 07:19:32 PM
Long time no see my old Monkey friends!  What's cook'in? ::MonkeyCool::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #787 12/24/08 -
Post by: Tamikosmom on December 30, 2008, 07:19:56 PM

No, they DIDN'T have a choice...as we learned before..FBI were there just as observers, they have no power over the Arubans while in Aruban territory,.

Maybe re-read my post?  that's exactly what I said.  FBI has an ******* role - Persistence could have had them aboard to do just that.

Then maybe Natalee's family could have been able to bring her home.


This is the point that those who are upholding Kyle Kingsman and John Silvetti do not get

jen ... if the contents of that cage/trap was Natalee Holloway's remains and ... there was safeguards had been put into place in regards to the chain of custody ... maybe the family would have been afforded the opportunity to bring their beloved home ... home to rest on American soil.

Considering the domino effect of accountability is so far reaching ... justice for Natalee Holloway is never going to come from an Aruban or Dutch court.  Closure for Natalee Holloway's family should have been the primary objective of the Persistent undertaking.

The betrayal of Natalee Holloway was outright despicable.  The betrayal of the family was despicable.  The betrayal of those who sacrificially donated was diespicable.

Janet

+++++

'Scarborough Country' for July 14
updated 8:45 a.m. PT, Fri., July. 15, 2005


JUG TWITTY, NATALEE HOLLOWAY'S STEPFATHER: Beth and I have been through this emotional roller coaster. And all we want is Natalee, whether she's alive or dead. We want to bring her back to the United States, and we'll leave and they can do whatever they want to do.

http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/8551824/
 


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #787 12/24/08 -
Post by: Magnolia on December 30, 2008, 07:21:39 PM
Just a thought, Kyle is the one who suggested the size of the trap.  We really don't know for sure the exact size except from what he has said.

There is also Kyle's superimposed image of Natalee that seems to fit
the scene proportions exactly.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #787 12/24/08 -
Post by: klaasend on December 30, 2008, 07:22:05 PM
Long time no see my old Monkey friends!  What's cook'in? ::MonkeyCool::

I Anidac - good to see you.  Too much to explain.  If you haven't been following along then I'm affraid you are on your own.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #787 12/24/08 -
Post by: Ree on December 30, 2008, 07:23:09 PM
ldstlou - I know you are only trying to stand up and protect Kyle and the crew of the Persistence against those who may have questions regarding some of the things Kyle has said, etc.

You are standing up for what you believe in and that is to be commended, however, what if you are wrong?  I'm not saying it's so but what if you and Natalee's family are being lied to?

When things don't seem right, we take a closer look.   Is that so wrong?

Hypothetical:

One of Joran's friends is posting in a private invite only forum where the members sign a confidentiality agreement not to copy and paste info posted in the forum on the outside.  This friend tells of information that would solve the case and put Joran in jail for the rest of his life.
  Do you tell others about this or do you honor the confidentiality agreement?

In the example above would a confidentiality agreement make any difference to you?  It would not to me.

So the FBI were informed, JQK was informed, Beth was informed according to Kermit. I don't see them going after Kyle...so why is Kermit here on SM going after Kyle and the crew of the Persistence?

Kermit informed Beth. Yes.
Kermit is NOT going after Kyle.
Kermit posted the truth to expose the Aruba cover-up




Kermit...come on. IF the Arubans walked away with Natalee...it was Kyle who exposed it not you.

I am pages behind so forgive me if this has been addressed.

LDS,

Are you freakin serious???!!!


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #787 12/24/08 -
Post by: Tamikosmom on December 30, 2008, 07:23:14 PM
Just a reminder for those who wanted to view it and missed it.  E! will be showing the News Special "The Final Hours of Natalee Holloway" again at midnight tonight my time which is Central.

Thanks texasmom.

I do not know if we can get it but ... I will check the guide.

Janet


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #787 12/24/08 -
Post by: truthseeker2 on December 30, 2008, 07:24:03 PM
Just a thought, Kyle is the one who suggested the size of the trap.  We really don't know for sure the exact size except from what he has said.

Well...then when do we decide what things to believe?  Do we discard the cage measurments, but believe that those are human remains, or vice versa?

I'm not sold on that being a skull, but the other bone looks pretty similar to a human hip joint.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #787 12/24/08 -
Post by: Tamikosmom on December 30, 2008, 07:28:48 PM
Just a thought, Kyle is the one who suggested the size of the trap.  We really don't know for sure the exact size except from what he has said.

oceanexploration (Kyle Kingman)
Re: Natalee Case Discussion #739 3/3 -
« Reply #92 on: March 03, 2008, 06:35:58 PM »


The trap was symmetrical in width and length at approximately 7.5 ft. It was approximately 2.25-2.5 ft high.  You're correct about the ROV video lens distorting perspective due to the paralax view lens.

http://scaredmonkeys.net/index.php?topic=2668.msg360072;topicseen#msg360072


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #787 12/24/08 -
Post by: anidac on December 30, 2008, 07:31:35 PM
Long time no see my old Monkey friends!  What's cook'in? ::MonkeyCool::

I Anidac - good to see you.  Too much to explain.  If you haven't been following along then I'm affraid you are on your own.

Believe it or not I continue to read in the cage at least a few times each week.  I have missed about 6 days though as Santa delivered a brand new baby grandson to our house last week.  The news about Peaches is what prompted me to actually log in and post this evening.  Now I am trying to hunt down this letter everyone is talking about tonight.

Hope the holiday season finds most of my old Monkey friends in good spirits!


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #787 12/24/08 -
Post by: hotping on December 30, 2008, 07:34:40 PM
Long time no see my old Monkey friends!  What's cook'in? ::MonkeyCool::

I Anidac - good to see you.  Too much to explain.  If you haven't been following along then I'm affraid you are on your own.

Believe it or not I continue to read in the cage at least a few times each week.  I have missed about 6 days though as Santa delivered a brand new baby grandson to our house last week.  The news about Peaches is what prompted me to actually log in and post this evening.  Now I am trying to hunt down this letter everyone is talking about tonight.

Hope the holiday season finds most of my old Monkey friends in good spirits!
Congratulations on the New Grandson....I Also Got A New Grandson for Christmas....and what a Gift It Is......  ::MonkeyWink::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #787 12/24/08 -
Post by: anidac on December 30, 2008, 07:37:31 PM
Long time no see my old Monkey friends!  What's cook'in? ::MonkeyCool::

I Anidac - good to see you.  Too much to explain.  If you haven't been following along then I'm affraid you are on your own.

Believe it or not I continue to read in the cage at least a few times each week.  I have missed about 6 days though as Santa delivered a brand new baby grandson to our house last week.  The news about Peaches is what prompted me to actually log in and post this evening.  Now I am trying to hunt down this letter everyone is talking about tonight.

Hope the holiday season finds most of my old Monkey friends in good spirits!
Congratulations on the New Grandson....I Also Got A New Grandson for Christmas....and what a Gift It Is......  ::MonkeyWink::

Congratulations back at 'ya!  This makes number 3 for us.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #787 12/24/08 -
Post by: hotping on December 30, 2008, 07:41:39 PM
Long time no see my old Monkey friends!  What's cook'in? ::MonkeyCool::

I Anidac - good to see you.  Too much to explain.  If you haven't been following along then I'm affraid you are on your own.

Believe it or not I continue to read in the cage at least a few times each week.  I have missed about 6 days though as Santa delivered a brand new baby grandson to our house last week.  The news about Peaches is what prompted me to actually log in and post this evening.  Now I am trying to hunt down this letter everyone is talking about tonight.

Hope the holiday season finds most of my old Monkey friends in good spirits!
Congratulations on the New Grandson....I Also Got A New Grandson for Christmas....and what a Gift It Is......  ::MonkeyWink::

Congratulations back at 'ya!  This makes number 3 for us.
Sorry Klaas for the O/T
Thank You! 2 Boys and 1 Girl for Us!  ::cartwheel:: 


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #787 12/24/08 -
Post by: truthseeker2 on December 30, 2008, 07:43:17 PM
Long time no see my old Monkey friends!  What's cook'in? ::MonkeyCool::

I Anidac - good to see you.  Too much to explain.  If you haven't been following along then I'm affraid you are on your own.

Believe it or not I continue to read in the cage at least a few times each week.  I have missed about 6 days though as Santa delivered a brand new baby grandson to our house last week.  The news about Peaches is what prompted me to actually log in and post this evening.  Now I am trying to hunt down this letter everyone is talking about tonight.

Hope the holiday season finds most of my old Monkey friends in good spirits!
Congratulations on the New Grandson....I Also Got A New Grandson for Christmas....and what a Gift It Is......  ::MonkeyWink::

Congratulations back at 'ya!  This makes number 3 for us.

Well, folks, I hate to brag.  But, as a grandparent it is my duty.  Last Christmas we got twin boys to make a total of three.  This was a very busy Christmas thus year because all three were very mobile!

Congrats to both of you on your wonderful family additions!


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #787 12/24/08 -
Post by: hotping on December 30, 2008, 07:43:36 PM
Just a thought, Kyle is the one who suggested the size of the trap.  We really don't know for sure the exact size except from what he has said.

Well...then when do we decide what things to believe?  Do we discard the cage measurments, but believe that those are human remains, or vice versa?

I'm not sold on that being a skull, but the other bone looks pretty similar to a human hip joint.
I believe that it was a skull but maybe not all of it.......like maybe parts were missing at the bottom....JMO


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #787 12/24/08 -
Post by: 2NJSons_Mom on December 30, 2008, 07:44:09 PM
 ::MonkeyCool::

It took me a while to catch up, but it was quite a read! 

Welcome to jen3560 & wingnut

Looking forward to Kermit's additional reveal, for sure.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #787 12/24/08 -
Post by: truthseeker2 on December 30, 2008, 07:47:51 PM
Just a thought, Kyle is the one who suggested the size of the trap.  We really don't know for sure the exact size except from what he has said.

Well...then when do we decide what things to believe?  Do we discard the cage measurments, but believe that those are human remains, or vice versa?

I'm not sold on that being a skull, but the other bone looks pretty similar to a human hip joint.
I believe that it was a skull but maybe not all of it.......like maybe parts were missing at the bottom....JMO

That could be.  It's just hard to tell from this pic.  I still want to know why no one, even Tim Miller and Dateline, did not question the thumbs down if this image was taken 60 seconds after that thumbs down.  I think that is one of the reasons why I have been skeptical about what we are seeing with that pic.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #787 12/24/08 -
Post by: hotping on December 30, 2008, 07:49:13 PM
Long time no see my old Monkey friends!  What's cook'in? ::MonkeyCool::

I Anidac - good to see you.  Too much to explain.  If you haven't been following along then I'm affraid you are on your own.

Believe it or not I continue to read in the cage at least a few times each week.  I have missed about 6 days though as Santa delivered a brand new baby grandson to our house last week.  The news about Peaches is what prompted me to actually log in and post this evening.  Now I am trying to hunt down this letter everyone is talking about tonight.

Hope the holiday season finds most of my old Monkey friends in good spirits!
Congratulations on the New Grandson....I Also Got A New Grandson for Christmas....and what a Gift It Is......  ::MonkeyWink::

Congratulations back at 'ya!  This makes number 3 for us.

Well, folks, I hate to brag.  But, as a grandparent it is my duty.  Last Christmas we got twin boys to make a total of three.  This was a very busy Christmas thus year because all three were very mobile!

Congrats to both of you on your wonderful family additions!
Thank You! I bet They were Very Lively this year especially if They are walking...Oh what Fun!  ::MonkeyWink::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #787 12/24/08 -
Post by: Magnolia on December 30, 2008, 07:51:53 PM
Just a thought, Kyle is the one who suggested the size of the trap.  We really don't know for sure the exact size except from what he has said.

Well...then when do we decide what things to believe?  Do we discard the cage measurments, but believe that those are human remains, or vice versa?

I'm not sold on that being a skull, but the other bone looks pretty similar to a human hip joint.
I believe that it was a skull but maybe not all of it.......like maybe parts were missing at the bottom....JMO

That could be.  It's just hard to tell from this pic.  I still want to know why no one, even Tim Miller and Dateline, did not question the thumbs down if this image was taken 60 seconds after that thumbs down.  I think that is one of the reasons why I have been skeptical about what we are seeing with that pic.

How do you know they did not question the thumbs down?
What could they do if they did?
They were not professional divers and had to take the word
of Tim Trahan.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #787 12/24/08 -
Post by: texasmom on December 30, 2008, 07:54:31 PM
Just a thought, Kyle is the one who suggested the size of the trap.  We really don't know for sure the exact size except from what he has said.

Well...then when do we decide what things to believe?  Do we discard the cage measurments, but believe that those are human remains, or vice versa?

I'm not sold on that being a skull, but the other bone looks pretty similar to a human hip joint.
I believe that it was a skull but maybe not all of it.......like maybe parts were missing at the bottom....JMO

That could be.  It's just hard to tell from this pic.  I still want to know why no one, even Tim Miller and Dateline, did not question the thumbs down if this image was taken 60 seconds after that thumbs down.  I think that is one of the reasons why I have been skeptical about what we are seeing with that pic.

I think it's quite possible that Tim Miller did question it.  I was told several months ago that there was a disagreement on the boat between Tim Miller and John Silvetti.  I never knew exactly when the disagreement happened, but believe that it did.  Some have said that the Dateline crew and Tim Miller left after the Dec 30th dive; could the disagreement have been on or around this date and caused by Tim Miller asking questions?  I think maybe so.  But I have no information to prove it one way or the other.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #787 12/24/08 -
Post by: Tamikosmom on December 30, 2008, 07:56:18 PM
GOOD NIGHT MONKEYS!!!  GOOD NIGHT ZOOKEEPERS!!!

I am gone for the evening.

It has been a very eventful day on the Natalee Holloway forum.

Thank you Kermit, jen and wingnut. 

Janet
4:55 PM PT


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #787 12/24/08 -
Post by: truthseeker2 on December 30, 2008, 07:57:05 PM
Just a thought, Kyle is the one who suggested the size of the trap.  We really don't know for sure the exact size except from what he has said.

Well...then when do we decide what things to believe?  Do we discard the cage measurments, but believe that those are human remains, or vice versa?

I'm not sold on that being a skull, but the other bone looks pretty similar to a human hip joint.
I believe that it was a skull but maybe not all of it.......like maybe parts were missing at the bottom....JMO

That could be.  It's just hard to tell from this pic.  I still want to know why no one, even Tim Miller and Dateline, did not question the thumbs down if this image was taken 60 seconds after that thumbs down.  I think that is one of the reasons why I have been skeptical about what we are seeing with that pic.

How do you know they did not question the thumbs down?
What could they do if they did?
They were not professional divers and had to take the word
of Tim Trahan.

I would expect with all the revelations made by Kyle he would have at least mentioned that to bolster his suspicions.  Also, on Dateline, Trahan comes out of the water and on to the boat and says "Nothing" with people all around.  No one questioned it.  Tim Miller was speaking to Dateline after that and he didn't say anything about seeing anything on the monitor at that moment.  So what did it look like to them?  I know, it's a rhetorical question and no one here would be able to answer, but it's still on my mind as a huge question.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #787 12/24/08 -
Post by: texasmom on December 30, 2008, 07:59:11 PM
GOOD NIGHT MONKEYS!!!  GOOD NIGHT ZOOKEEPERS!!!

I am gone for the evening.

It has been a very eventful day on the Natalee Holloway forum.

Thank you Kermit, jen and wingnut. 

Janet
4:55 PM PT

Goodnight Janet!  Yes, a very eventful day; have a great evening!

 ::MonkeyCool::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #787 12/24/08 -
Post by: Keepthefaith on December 30, 2008, 08:00:00 PM
Just a thought, Kyle is the one who suggested the size of the trap.  We really don't know for sure the exact size except from what he has said.

Well...then when do we decide what things to believe?  Do we discard the cage measurments, but believe that those are human remains, or vice versa?

I'm not sold on that being a skull, but the other bone looks pretty similar to a human hip joint.
I believe that it was a skull but maybe not all of it.......like maybe parts were missing at the bottom....JMO

That could be.  It's just hard to tell from this pic.  I still want to know why no one, even Tim Miller and Dateline, did not question the thumbs down if this image was taken 60 seconds after that thumbs down.  I think that is one of the reasons why I have been skeptical about what we are seeing with that pic.

How do you know they did not question the thumbs down?
What could they do if they did?
They were not professional divers and had to take the word
of Tim Trahan.

I would expect with all the revelations made by Kyle he would have at least mentioned that to bolster his suspicions.  Also, on Dateline, Trahan comes out of the water and on to the boat and says "Nothing" with people all around.  No one questioned it.  Tim Miller was speaking to Dateline after that and he didn't say anything about seeing anything on the monitor at that moment.  So what did it look like to them?  I know, it's a rhetorical question and no one here would be able to answer, but it's still on my mind as a huge question.

We discussed this before Truthseeker2 regarding Tim M.If you watch Tim in the video on dateline he say's "Bullshit" to the signal.Someone is probably quicker then i in retrieving that specific video!


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #787 12/24/08 -
Post by: Keepthefaith on December 30, 2008, 08:00:28 PM
GOOD NIGHT MONKEYS!!!  GOOD NIGHT ZOOKEEPERS!!!

I am gone for the evening.

It has been a very eventful day on the Natalee Holloway forum.

Thank you Kermit, jen and wingnut. 

Janet
4:55 PM PT

The Fraser Valley Sleeps??? ::MonkeyDance::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #787 12/24/08 -
Post by: San on December 30, 2008, 08:02:29 PM
Hello Monekys,

Thank you Klaas for approving my membership.

I am the former Natalee's Freebirds Administrator.

To answer ldstlou - NO, I am not disgruntled.  No, I am no longer a member at that forum.  I resigned today.

That is an outstanding group of people, with hearts of gold.  I admire and respect each and every one of them.

It was merely time for me to move on.  I felt that we had achieved all we could there over the past 2 1/2 years, and all of the Freebirds - former and current - will always be in my heart.

Kermit did the right thing by making this information public at Beth Holloway's request (albeit 2 months after she asked us to do so thanks to the need to avoid litigation).

I just simply couldn't stand by any longer and watch the continued confusion perpetrated by two particular posters here.  Whether it's been unintentional or deliberate - it really needs to stop now.

Wingnut made an excellent point - and I feel it's one that's been largely overlooked - pressure needs to be applied to get the answers as to what happened to the human remains Aruba recovered from that fishing cage.

Monkeys - you all are stellar at banding together and getting action.

The FBI can only do so much - with their limited jurisdiction.  They can speak to and subpoena from the members of the Persistence their statements and video to ascertain what was found.

Then it becomes an international issue.  Our State Department is where the encouragement is needed - to put pressure on the Hague to get to the bottom of this.

But something must be done.  Natalee's family has been through enough, and that they (and Natalee) were treated so shabbily by the one resource they felt they could trust is utterly heart wrenching.

Thank you Monkeys for allowing me to be here - let's help Natalee's family get some justice!

I am far behind and I wanted to say I agree.

Also, welcome jen3560 and Wingnut.

Hi Kermit nice to see you back.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #787 12/24/08 -
Post by: wingnut on December 30, 2008, 08:03:24 PM
Just a thought, Kyle is the one who suggested the size of the trap.  We really don't know for sure the exact size except from what he has said.

Well...then when do we decide what things to believe?  Do we discard the cage measurments, but believe that those are human remains, or vice versa?

I'm not sold on that being a skull, but the other bone looks pretty similar to a human hip joint.
I believe that it was a skull but maybe not all of it.......like maybe parts were missing at the bottom....JMO

That could be.  It's just hard to tell from this pic.  I still want to know why no one, even Tim Miller and Dateline, did not question the thumbs down if this image was taken 60 seconds after that thumbs down.  I think that is one of the reasons why I have been skeptical about what we are seeing with that pic.


IIRC, there was to be a "thumbs up" if immediately recognizable as Natalee.  A "thumbs down" if not.  So, based on what we (and they) have seen, a "thumbs down" WAS APPROPRIATE.



Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #787 12/24/08 -
Post by: Keepthefaith on December 30, 2008, 08:06:43 PM
Have you seen the video where it appears Tim says "Bullshit" wingnut??I believe it's in the Dateline video..We had the discussion before and i think he clearly says that..


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #787 12/24/08 -
Post by: truthseeker2 on December 30, 2008, 08:06:49 PM

I would expect with all the revelations made by Kyle he would have at least mentioned that to bolster his suspicions.  Also, on Dateline, Trahan comes out of the water and on to the boat and says "Nothing" with people all around.  No one questioned it.  Tim Miller was speaking to Dateline after that and he didn't say anything about seeing anything on the monitor at that moment.  So what did it look like to them?  I know, it's a rhetorical question and no one here would be able to answer, but it's still on my mind as a huge question.

We discussed this before Truthseeker2 regarding Tim M.If you watch Tim in the video on dateline he say's "Bullshit" to the signal.Someone is probably quicker then i in retrieving that specific video!

I know.  But, that's it?  Not, wait just a minute...look at that...or, what the h3ll is that right there?  If I thought I was looking at possible human remains , but someone else dismissed it so quickly I think I would have to push the issue just a bit more.  Especially with an American film crew right there to capture it.  So, I have to wonder what that image looked like on that monitor at that very moment.  And has Tim M. come out since then to say that he still believes those were human remains?   I just don't know.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #787 12/24/08 -
Post by: truthseeker2 on December 30, 2008, 08:09:04 PM
Just a thought, Kyle is the one who suggested the size of the trap.  We really don't know for sure the exact size except from what he has said.

Well...then when do we decide what things to believe?  Do we discard the cage measurments, but believe that those are human remains, or vice versa?

I'm not sold on that being a skull, but the other bone looks pretty similar to a human hip joint.
I believe that it was a skull but maybe not all of it.......like maybe parts were missing at the bottom....JMO

That could be.  It's just hard to tell from this pic.  I still want to know why no one, even Tim Miller and Dateline, did not question the thumbs down if this image was taken 60 seconds after that thumbs down.  I think that is one of the reasons why I have been skeptical about what we are seeing with that pic.


IIRC, there was to be a "thumbs up" if immediately recognizable as Natalee.  A "thumbs down" if not.  So, based on what we (and they) have seen, a "thumbs down" WAS APPROPRIATE.



I think the information we received was a two thumbs up for if it's Natalee and one thumbs up for human remains not readily identifiable.  There was not thumbs down.  Is that not right?


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #787 12/24/08 -
Post by: texasmom on December 30, 2008, 08:11:16 PM
Just a thought, Kyle is the one who suggested the size of the trap.  We really don't know for sure the exact size except from what he has said.

Well...then when do we decide what things to believe?  Do we discard the cage measurments, but believe that those are human remains, or vice versa?

I'm not sold on that being a skull, but the other bone looks pretty similar to a human hip joint.
I believe that it was a skull but maybe not all of it.......like maybe parts were missing at the bottom....JMO

That could be.  It's just hard to tell from this pic.  I still want to know why no one, even Tim Miller and Dateline, did not question the thumbs down if this image was taken 60 seconds after that thumbs down.  I think that is one of the reasons why I have been skeptical about what we are seeing with that pic.


IIRC, there was to be a "thumbs up" if immediately recognizable as Natalee.  A "thumbs down" if not.  So, based on what we (and they) have seen, a "thumbs down" WAS APPROPRIATE.



I think the information we received was a two thumbs up for if it's Natalee and one thumbs up for human remains not readily identifiable.  There was not thumbs down.  Is that not right?

Yes, I believe that's how Kyle explained it in a post he made here.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #787 12/24/08 -
Post by: Keepthefaith on December 30, 2008, 08:12:53 PM

I would expect with all the revelations made by Kyle he would have at least mentioned that to bolster his suspicions.  Also, on Dateline, Trahan comes out of the water and on to the boat and says "Nothing" with people all around.  No one questioned it.  Tim Miller was speaking to Dateline after that and he didn't say anything about seeing anything on the monitor at that moment.  So what did it look like to them?  I know, it's a rhetorical question and no one here would be able to answer, but it's still on my mind as a huge question.

We discussed this before Truthseeker2 regarding Tim M.If you watch Tim in the video on dateline he say's "Bullshit" to the signal.Someone is probably quicker then i in retrieving that specific video!

I know.  But, that's it?  Not, wait just a minute...look at that...or, what the h3ll is that right there?  If I thought I was looking at possible human remains , but someone else dismissed it so quickly I think I would have to push the issue just a bit more.  Especially with an American film crew right there to capture it.  So, I have to wonder what that image looked like on that monitor at that very moment.  And has Tim M. come out since then to say that he still believes those were human remains?   I just don't know.

I would think in private he's said his peace but i'm definitely not in the know!I think that's why what the Persistence didn't do is so alarming to me!Only if we had the logs of when people where onboard as well as off!Protocol.From what i understand we won't get those answer's from anyone on the Persistence.It's unfortunate.We must continue to question everything.I belive the concentration of power is in few hands on Aruba and if Paulus is connected to that power structure someone in the Mansur family has to know something.Whether Jossy personally knows?It remains to be seen.The Mansur's,The Croes,The Oduber's.Who else is in the power structure??


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #787 12/24/08 -
Post by: Keepthefaith on December 30, 2008, 08:14:41 PM
Janet's still here... ::MonkeyDance:: ::MonkeyDance:: ::MonkeyDance::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #787 12/24/08 -
Post by: Tamikosmom on December 30, 2008, 08:16:45 PM

I think it's quite possible that Tim Miller did question it.  I was told several months ago that there was a disagreement on the boat between Tim Miller and John Silvetti.  I never knew exactly when the disagreement happened, but believe that it did.  Some have said that the Dateline crew and Tim Miller left after the Dec 30th dive; could the disagreement have been on or around this date and caused by Tim Miller asking questions?  I think maybe so.  But I have no information to prove it one way or the other.


It was difficult for Tim Miller to comprehend the official findings in regards to the contents of the cage.  He had been so sure that the initial ROV images he viewed prior to the dive revealed the remains of Natalee Holloway.

I imagine when all was said and done he had no choice but to accept the official findings.  I do not believe it would never have ever occur to him that there was a conspiracy encompassing the Persistence endeavor.

I contend that Tim Miller was also betrayed.  His organization was used as a means for raising funds to support a cause ... a cause that never existed.

Janet

+++++++

THE DATELINE SPECIAL

The search for Natalee Holloway
TRANSCRIPT
By Chris Hansen
Correspondent
NBC News
updated 5:20 p.m. PT, Fri., Feb. 22, 2008


Tim Miller: I stepped on the boat and said “Natalee we're coming to get you.” Now we're finally coming to get you. And I still believe that from the bottom of my heart. She's out here and now we're on our way.

Over the holiday season, the crew of the persistence worked day and night to survey the ocean floor and look for targets that could hold the key to finding Natalee.

On Christmas Eve sonar pictures revealed what looked like a large trap, almost exactly where Tim Miller theorized it would be.

And on Dec. 29 the crew dropped a remote operated vehicle, or ROV, into the water to get a closer look.

Tim Miller: It looked like a skull. Still looks like a skull.  ... In my years of searching we have seen several bodies, skeletal remains--I have seen my own daughter's skeletal remains. I can’t help but believe at this moment that that is human remains in that crab trap. [/color]

http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/23301056/page/4/


The search for Natalee Holloway
TRANSCRIPT
By Chris Hansen
Correspondent
NBC News
updated 5:20 p.m. PT, Fri., Feb. 22, 2008


Dave Holloway: I got a phone call from Tim.

Chris Hansen: And what'd he say?

Dave Holloway: He told me, he said, "Dave, we found her."

Chris Hansen: "We found her?"

Dave Holloway: Yeah. I said, "Are you sure?" and he said, "I’m 99.9 percent sure."  He said, "We hadn't gone down and dove under or anything. But the photographs--"he said, "I tell you, Dave." I-- he said, "That's what we're looking for. And that's gotta-- that-- that's it."

http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/23301056/page/4/


Kermit
Re: Natalee Case Discussion #780 11/26/08 -
« Reply #902 on: Today at 03:09:00 AM »


Kyle said: "John didn't want Tim Miller on board the Persistence because he said Tim wasn't necessary any more and was a liability"

http://scaredmonkeys.net/index.php?topic=4182.msg564763#msg564763


oceanexploration (Kyle Kingman)
Re: Natalee Case Discussion #776 11/19-08
« Reply #705 on: November 20, 2008, 11:22:14 PM »


Tim Miller was never on the Persistence while I was not on board.  He stepped off on or about the 1st of Jan to follow up on the false lead in Costa Rica IIRC.

http://scaredmonkeys.net/index.php?topic=4153.msg551304#msg551304


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #787 12/24/08 -
Post by: truthseeker2 on December 30, 2008, 08:16:49 PM

I would expect with all the revelations made by Kyle he would have at least mentioned that to bolster his suspicions.  Also, on Dateline, Trahan comes out of the water and on to the boat and says "Nothing" with people all around.  No one questioned it.  Tim Miller was speaking to Dateline after that and he didn't say anything about seeing anything on the monitor at that moment.  So what did it look like to them?  I know, it's a rhetorical question and no one here would be able to answer, but it's still on my mind as a huge question.

We discussed this before Truthseeker2 regarding Tim M.If you watch Tim in the video on dateline he say's "Bullshit" to the signal.Someone is probably quicker then i in retrieving that specific video!

I know.  But, that's it?  Not, wait just a minute...look at that...or, what the h3ll is that right there?  If I thought I was looking at possible human remains , but someone else dismissed it so quickly I think I would have to push the issue just a bit more.  Especially with an American film crew right there to capture it.  So, I have to wonder what that image looked like on that monitor at that very moment.  And has Tim M. come out since then to say that he still believes those were human remains?   I just don't know.

I would think in private he's said his peace but i'm definitely not in the know!I think that's why what the Persistence didn't do is so alarming to me!Only if we had the logs of when people where onboard as well as off!Protocol.From what i understand we won't get those answer's from anyone on the Persistence.It's unfortunate.We must continue to question everything.I belive the concentration of power is in few hands on Aruba and if Paulus is connected to that power structure someone in the Mansur family has to know something.Whether Jossy personally knows?It remains to be seen.The Mansur's,The Croes,The Oduber's.Who else is in the power structure??

Bingo.  These are the people that know.  I wish we could hear from Eduardo about his impression of what was in that trap.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #787 12/24/08 -
Post by: Tamikosmom on December 30, 2008, 08:19:46 PM
Janet's still here... ::MonkeyDance:: ::MonkeyDance:: ::MonkeyDance::

Hubby is in our vehicle in the driveway.  The sound of the revving causes me to think that a "beep" on the horn will follow shortly.

I had better go or ... the guy may just take off without me.  So far ... it has only happened in his dreams.

 ::MonkeyHaHa::

Janet


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #787 12/24/08 -
Post by: San on December 30, 2008, 08:20:48 PM
Good Evening,

First, I would like to take a second to acknowledge Peaches and her determination to beat cancer. It was one of the bravest battles I have ever witnessed and I learned a lot from her. She will be sorely missed. My thoughts and prayers are with Mr. Peaches and their lovely daughter. I hope that God grants them the strength they will all need over the remainders of their own lives.

God Bless you Peaches and your family, you are in my prayers.

+++++

I have kinda been biting my tongue on the whole Freebird issue. Yes, I was a Freebird too and know them all. They are some of the best of the best. They are some of the most compassionate, caring and kind people I have ever gotten to know. Jen is a real sweetheart that gave so much of herself over the last few years that words can't really express my gratitude for her efforts. She is to be thanked along with everyone else still there and giving so much of themselves.

If they did not have the forum this info would most likely never have been known. So, there is a reason for everything and a cause and goal brought them together. They have remained true to their stated intent and each other.

When evidence of a crime was discovered, they did the right thing - they exposed it. That's what I have come to expect from such a loyal and devoted group. Their devotion to Natalee is unquestionable.

As, I told you a month or so ago, Kermit was always telling the truth. How do I know? I know because I know what makes Kermit tick and got to know her and her values. Those are some of the staunchest values on any board. When you are true to your own beliefs, well, you are never making a mistake.
+++

Wingnut - good to see you again my friend, happy holidays to you and yours'.

Jen I wish you the best no matter where your heart takes you!

This is why I always believed Kermit.  You can tell how a person posts.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #787 12/24/08 -
Post by: Tamikosmom on December 30, 2008, 08:20:57 PM
Klaas/Mods

Please delete post 665.  I messed up again.

Thanks

Janet


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #787 12/24/08 -
Post by: Keepthefaith on December 30, 2008, 08:24:06 PM

I would expect with all the revelations made by Kyle he would have at least mentioned that to bolster his suspicions.  Also, on Dateline, Trahan comes out of the water and on to the boat and says "Nothing" with people all around.  No one questioned it.  Tim Miller was speaking to Dateline after that and he didn't say anything about seeing anything on the monitor at that moment.  So what did it look like to them?  I know, it's a rhetorical question and no one here would be able to answer, but it's still on my mind as a huge question.

We discussed this before Truthseeker2 regarding Tim M.If you watch Tim in the video on dateline he say's "Bullshit" to the signal.Someone is probably quicker then i in retrieving that specific video!

I know.  But, that's it?  Not, wait just a minute...look at that...or, what the h3ll is that right there?  If I thought I was looking at possible human remains , but someone else dismissed it so quickly I think I would have to push the issue just a bit more.  Especially with an American film crew right there to capture it.  So, I have to wonder what that image looked like on that monitor at that very moment.  And has Tim M. come out since then to say that he still believes those were human remains?   I just don't know.

I would think in private he's said his peace but i'm definitely not in the know!I think that's why what the Persistence didn't do is so alarming to me!Only if we had the logs of when people where onboard as well as off!Protocol.From what i understand we won't get those answer's from anyone on the Persistence.It's unfortunate.We must continue to question everything.I belive the concentration of power is in few hands on Aruba and if Paulus is connected to that power structure someone in the Mansur family has to know something.Whether Jossy personally knows?It remains to be seen.The Mansur's,The Croes,The Oduber's.Who else is in the power structure??

Bingo.  These are the people that know.  I wish we could hear from Eduardo about his impression of what was in that trap.

Why do they know is my question?It goes back to what does Paulus do for people that is so important as to protect him till the ends of the Earth??Where and how do alll the se families co -mingle on the island?They've got to come across one another quite often.It's got to be BIG,BIG..All they had to do was let Natalee go home but NO!Why.Still on the hunt for    ......................................JUSTICE FOR NATALEE..............................................


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #787 12/24/08 -
Post by: klaasend on December 30, 2008, 08:31:27 PM
TONIGHT - YEAR END SPECIAL - DANA PRETZER - tune in at 9pm ET:

http://scaredmonkeys.com/2008/12/30/the-dana-pretzer-show-on-scared-monkeys-radio-listen-live-tonight-at-9pm-eastern-dana-does-the-year-in-review-with-guests-robin-sax-and-red/

(http://i118.photobucket.com/albums/o100/klaasen3/Sub5/pretzer123008.jpg)


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #787 12/24/08 -
Post by: hotping on December 30, 2008, 08:34:54 PM
Thank You Klaas for the Reminder about the Show!  ::MonkeyWink::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #787 12/24/08 -
Post by: truthseeker2 on December 30, 2008, 08:36:41 PM

I would expect with all the revelations made by Kyle he would have at least mentioned that to bolster his suspicions.  Also, on Dateline, Trahan comes out of the water and on to the boat and says "Nothing" with people all around.  No one questioned it.  Tim Miller was speaking to Dateline after that and he didn't say anything about seeing anything on the monitor at that moment.  So what did it look like to them?  I know, it's a rhetorical question and no one here would be able to answer, but it's still on my mind as a huge question.

We discussed this before Truthseeker2 regarding Tim M.If you watch Tim in the video on dateline he say's "Bullshit" to the signal.Someone is probably quicker then i in retrieving that specific video!

I know.  But, that's it?  Not, wait just a minute...look at that...or, what the h3ll is that right there?  If I thought I was looking at possible human remains , but someone else dismissed it so quickly I think I would have to push the issue just a bit more.  Especially with an American film crew right there to capture it.  So, I have to wonder what that image looked like on that monitor at that very moment.  And has Tim M. come out since then to say that he still believes those were human remains?   I just don't know.

I would think in private he's said his peace but i'm definitely not in the know!I think that's why what the Persistence didn't do is so alarming to me!Only if we had the logs of when people where onboard as well as off!Protocol.From what i understand we won't get those answer's from anyone on the Persistence.It's unfortunate.We must continue to question everything.I belive the concentration of power is in few hands on Aruba and if Paulus is connected to that power structure someone in the Mansur family has to know something.Whether Jossy personally knows?It remains to be seen.The Mansur's,The Croes,The Oduber's.Who else is in the power structure??

Bingo.  These are the people that know.  I wish we could hear from Eduardo about his impression of what was in that trap.

Why do they know is my question?It goes back to what does Paulus do for people that is so important as to protect him till the ends of the Earth??Where and how do alll the se families co -mingle on the island?They've got to come across one another quite often.It's got to be BIG,BIG..All they had to do was let Natalee go home but NO!Why.Still on the hunt for    ......................................JUSTICE FOR NATALEE..............................................

I have asked this question in a slightly different way.  I ask myself...What could be sooo bad that the people on that island do not want the world to know?  What could be so bad that putting Joran and even his father in jail for that they could not take credit for punishing the guilty?

Natalee's death could have been explained if it was truly an accident.  It could even be explained if it was an accident and the boys panicked and tried to hide the body.  But...they chose to protect this kid...why?  The idea that Joran and Paulus could/would expose some political secrets or the involvment of law enforcement?  Heck...these two are proven liars.  They could have denied anything Paulus or Joran had to say by exposing the lies told by them in the first few days.  And with Paulus being a 'failed judge in training' they could claim he was just a disgruntled government employee.  And as for any documentation that Paulus may have...well, we know from the Mathews case they know how to make documents disappear in Aruba.

So I ask myself....what truth is so horrific that they are willing to let the entire island suffer for it?????


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #787 12/24/08 -
Post by: windy city on December 30, 2008, 08:39:46 PM
Happy Holiday's Monkeys!

My prayers go out to Peaches and her family.  I enjoyed reading her posts very much.  She was a pillar of strength throughout her battle with cancer.  I don't know of many people who could endure what she did and remain so positive.



Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #787 12/24/08 -
Post by: Keepthefaith on December 30, 2008, 08:47:32 PM
What are the biggest Money-producing industries on Aruba?Tourism,Importing/exporting,oil,casinos(laundering money),Banks(laundering money).Who owns them?


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #787 12/24/08 -
Post by: windy city on December 30, 2008, 08:53:42 PM
I don't post much but read often.   All I can say is WOW.  Whenever I want to know a fact or quote,  I always look for Janet.  I very much appreciate her wisdom, honesty,  and sense of humor.  If there is such a thing as a moral compass, it is Janet, imo. 

Janet has always been a very good judge of character and it is very hard to pull one over on her. (reminds me of my own mother who had to straighten my butt out a few years back) 

Kermit is the most honest and decent frog I have ever had the pleasure of reading.  This frog would leap the tallest buildings to find out the truth about Natalee.

I don't see the same conviction from another poster here who I once enjoyed reading.  I don't know if it's because this other poster is being mis led or because they are doing the mis leading.

My two cents 


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #787 12/24/08 -
Post by: wingnut on December 30, 2008, 08:56:04 PM
Just a thought, Kyle is the one who suggested the size of the trap.  We really don't know for sure the exact size except from what he has said.

Well...then when do we decide what things to believe?  Do we discard the cage measurments, but believe that those are human remains, or vice versa?

I'm not sold on that being a skull, but the other bone looks pretty similar to a human hip joint.
I believe that it was a skull but maybe not all of it.......like maybe parts were missing at the bottom....JMO

That could be.  It's just hard to tell from this pic.  I still want to know why no one, even Tim Miller and Dateline, did not question the thumbs down if this image was taken 60 seconds after that thumbs down.  I think that is one of the reasons why I have been skeptical about what we are seeing with that pic.


IIRC, there was to be a "thumbs up" if immediately recognizable as Natalee.  A "thumbs down" if not.  So, based on what we (and they) have seen, a "thumbs down" WAS APPROPRIATE.



I think the information we received was a two thumbs up for if it's Natalee and one thumbs up for human remains not readily identifiable.  There was not thumbs down.  Is that not right?


You are right - my bad.

-The famous "thumbs down" - Tim Trahan said he could not conclusively see human skeletal remains. The signals were: One thumb up for skeletal remains (body), two thumbs up for Natalee. When Tim came out of the water as seen on camera in the Dateline special, he was winded from the dive and gave a short answer of "No, nothing". He (along with many of us) were expecting something very clear and immediately identifiable. It wasn't so clear or obvious as he (and we, along with Tim Miller) expected and hoped upon visual-only inspection.
Tim (along with myself) didn't expect an intact skeleton. We expected a high level of scavenging by small to moderate sized predators including crustaceans, grouper, small sharks..etc. which (IMO) would likely spread any remains radially away from the trap opening.
Reply #736 on: Today at 12:05:16 PM »


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #787 12/24/08 -
Post by: klaasend on December 30, 2008, 08:57:47 PM
DANA PRETZER - YEAR END SPECIAL - IN 3 MINUTES

http://scaredmonkeys.com/radio.m3u


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #787 12/24/08 -
Post by: texasmom on December 30, 2008, 09:00:01 PM
DANA PRETZER - YEAR END SPECIAL - IN 3 MINUTES

http://scaredmonkeys.com/radio.m3u

Thanks Klaas!   ::MonkeyCool::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #787 12/24/08 -
Post by: truthseeker2 on December 30, 2008, 09:00:25 PM
What are the biggest Money-producing industries on Aruba?Tourism,Importing/exporting,oil,casinos(laundering money),Banks(laundering money).Who owns them?

Well, the above board money making industry would be tourism.  (Looks like their decision to protect the Sloots isn't working out very well for that industry)  I think aloe export is another big industry.  The family that runs/owns the biggest, and maybe only, share of that is named Posner.  IIRC.  I think they are a Jewish family not related to Michael Posner.  But, I am not certain about that part.

The casino business has to be big as well.  They provide a lot of jobs, but rely on tourists for the legal profits as well as any other type of 'profit' that is to be had.  Who owns those?  Different people.  Some Americans have interests in the hotels and casinos, don't they?

The retail and restaurant businesses would be tied to tourism as well.

Everything else would be 'underground' types of businesses.  Money laundering, porn, drugs, etc. I don't know who controls that on Aruba anymore than I know who runs that type of stuff here in the U.S.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #787 12/24/08 -
Post by: Magnolia on December 30, 2008, 09:01:18 PM

I would expect with all the revelations made by Kyle he would have at least mentioned that to bolster his suspicions.  Also, on Dateline, Trahan comes out of the water and on to the boat and says "Nothing" with people all around.  No one questioned it.  Tim Miller was speaking to Dateline after that and he didn't say anything about seeing anything on the monitor at that moment.  So what did it look like to them?  I know, it's a rhetorical question and no one here would be able to answer, but it's still on my mind as a huge question.

We discussed this before Truthseeker2 regarding Tim M.If you watch Tim in the video on dateline he say's "Bullshit" to the signal.Someone is probably quicker then i in retrieving that specific video!

I know.  But, that's it?  Not, wait just a minute...look at that...or, what the h3ll is that right there?  If I thought I was looking at possible human remains , but someone else dismissed it so quickly I think I would have to push the issue just a bit more.  Especially with an American film crew right there to capture it.  So, I have to wonder what that image looked like on that monitor at that very moment.  And has Tim M. come out since then to say that he still believes those were human remains?   I just don't know.

Surely you know that the Dateline footage was edited to fit their program.
We do not know what was said or what was contested.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #787 12/24/08 -
Post by: truthseeker2 on December 30, 2008, 09:07:39 PM

I would expect with all the revelations made by Kyle he would have at least mentioned that to bolster his suspicions.  Also, on Dateline, Trahan comes out of the water and on to the boat and says "Nothing" with people all around.  No one questioned it.  Tim Miller was speaking to Dateline after that and he didn't say anything about seeing anything on the monitor at that moment.  So what did it look like to them?  I know, it's a rhetorical question and no one here would be able to answer, but it's still on my mind as a huge question.

We discussed this before Truthseeker2 regarding Tim M.If you watch Tim in the video on dateline he say's "Bullshit" to the signal.Someone is probably quicker then i in retrieving that specific video!

I know.  But, that's it?  Not, wait just a minute...look at that...or, what the h3ll is that right there?  If I thought I was looking at possible human remains , but someone else dismissed it so quickly I think I would have to push the issue just a bit more.  Especially with an American film crew right there to capture it.  So, I have to wonder what that image looked like on that monitor at that very moment.  And has Tim M. come out since then to say that he still believes those were human remains?   I just don't know.

Surely you know that the Dateline footage was edited to fit their program.
We do not know what was said or what was contested.

Yes, of course, I do undersand that.  But when I think of the possibility of maybe the biggest story of the year being captured live by a network film crew, and the image on the monitor may not appear to warrant a thumbs down...I just let it go?  I don't show it?  I don't know...it still isn't making sense to this analytical mind.

If Kyle does come back here maybe he can help me understand what they were seeing at that very moment on that monitor.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #787 12/24/08 -
Post by: Keepthefaith on December 30, 2008, 09:15:20 PM
When was the last time Kyle was on the Freebird's site??Wingnut?If you can answer..I don't think he's typing anything anymore for a good reason!


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #787 12/24/08 -
Post by: ldstlou on December 30, 2008, 09:21:35 PM
When was the last time Kyle was on the Freebird's site??Wingnut?If you can answer..I don't think he's typing anything anymore for a good reason!

He is still typing. he adressed jen's letter line by line and e-mailed it to both Jug and I tonight. I am satisfied with his answers.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #787 12/24/08 -
Post by: klaasend on December 30, 2008, 09:21:42 PM
On Dana - Red talking about Beth Holloway right now.

Red says that Beth is just as much hurt and driven today as she was back in 2005.  The pain you see on her face and comments she makes, it's amazing to Red that Beth still has that inner drive.  Beth will not stop her quest for justice. 


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #787 12/24/08 -
Post by: Magnolia on December 30, 2008, 09:26:06 PM

I would expect with all the revelations made by Kyle he would have at least mentioned that to bolster his suspicions.  Also, on Dateline, Trahan comes out of the water and on to the boat and says "Nothing" with people all around.  No one questioned it.  Tim Miller was speaking to Dateline after that and he didn't say anything about seeing anything on the monitor at that moment.  So what did it look like to them?  I know, it's a rhetorical question and no one here would be able to answer, but it's still on my mind as a huge question.

We discussed this before Truthseeker2 regarding Tim M.If you watch Tim in the video on dateline he say's "Bullshit" to the signal.Someone is probably quicker then i in retrieving that specific video!

I know.  But, that's it?  Not, wait just a minute...look at that...or, what the h3ll is that right there?  If I thought I was looking at possible human remains , but someone else dismissed it so quickly I think I would have to push the issue just a bit more.  Especially with an American film crew right there to capture it.  So, I have to wonder what that image looked like on that monitor at that very moment.  And has Tim M. come out since then to say that he still believes those were human remains?   I just don't know.

Surely you know that the Dateline footage was edited to fit their program.
We do not know what was said or what was contested.

Yes, of course, I do undersand that.  But when I think of the possibility of maybe the biggest story of the year being captured live by a network film crew, and the image on the monitor may not appear to warrant a thumbs down...I just let it go?  I don't show it?  I don't know...it still isn't making sense to this analytical mind.

If Kyle does come back here maybe he can help me understand what they were seeing at that very moment on that monitor.

Maybe you should shoot off an email to Kyle, like ldstlou suggested.
I am sure he would explain it to you and your analytical mind


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #787 12/24/08 -
Post by: klaasend on December 30, 2008, 09:26:53 PM
Dana asks Red:  how does Red feel about the media coverage of the Holloway case in 2008?

RED:  One of the interresting things that happened in 2008, it was JVDS that brought the story back into the media's attention twice in 2008.  One of the interresting things was the swing of public opinion even with those that were defending Joran turned against him.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #787 12/24/08 -
Post by: truthseeker2 on December 30, 2008, 09:28:07 PM
When was the last time Kyle was on the Freebird's site??Wingnut?If you can answer..I don't think he's typing anything anymore for a good reason!

He is still typing. he adressed jen's letter line by line and e-mailed it to both Jug and I tonight. I am satisfied with his answers.

Any chance you might ask him about the ROV image at 15:40 on 12/30 and what that looked like to them on the monitors there on the Persistence?  I just don't understand how a thumbs down signal at 15:39 was accepted if that is what they were looking at.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #787 12/24/08 -
Post by: truthseeker2 on December 30, 2008, 09:30:05 PM

I would expect with all the revelations made by Kyle he would have at least mentioned that to bolster his suspicions.  Also, on Dateline, Trahan comes out of the water and on to the boat and says "Nothing" with people all around.  No one questioned it.  Tim Miller was speaking to Dateline after that and he didn't say anything about seeing anything on the monitor at that moment.  So what did it look like to them?  I know, it's a rhetorical question and no one here would be able to answer, but it's still on my mind as a huge question.

We discussed this before Truthseeker2 regarding Tim M.If you watch Tim in the video on dateline he say's "Bullshit" to the signal.Someone is probably quicker then i in retrieving that specific video!

I know.  But, that's it?  Not, wait just a minute...look at that...or, what the h3ll is that right there?  If I thought I was looking at possible human remains , but someone else dismissed it so quickly I think I would have to push the issue just a bit more.  Especially with an American film crew right there to capture it.  So, I have to wonder what that image looked like on that monitor at that very moment.  And has Tim M. come out since then to say that he still believes those were human remains?   I just don't know.

Surely you know that the Dateline footage was edited to fit their program.
We do not know what was said or what was contested.

Yes, of course, I do undersand that.  But when I think of the possibility of maybe the biggest story of the year being captured live by a network film crew, and the image on the monitor may not appear to warrant a thumbs down...I just let it go?  I don't show it?  I don't know...it still isn't making sense to this analytical mind.

If Kyle does come back here maybe he can help me understand what they were seeing at that very moment on that monitor.

Maybe you should shoot off an email to Kyle, like ldstlou suggested.
I am sure he would explain it to you and your analytical mind

Uh...I do not have direct, or indirect for that matter, communication with Kyle.  never have.  Not even when he posted here.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #787 12/24/08 -
Post by: wingnut on December 30, 2008, 09:33:53 PM
When was the last time Kyle was on the Freebird's site??Wingnut?If you can answer..I don't think he's typing anything anymore for a good reason!


It has been awhile since he was banned.  I'm sorry, don't remember exactly when.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #787 12/24/08 -
Post by: Keepthefaith on December 30, 2008, 09:33:58 PM
When was the last time Kyle was on the Freebird's site??Wingnut?If you can answer..I don't think he's typing anything anymore for a good reason!

He is still typing. he adressed jen's letter line by line and e-mailed it to both Jug and I tonight. I am satisfied with his answers.

Ldstlou.Yes or No.Did Kyle turn over all information before Kermit?


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #787 12/24/08 -
Post by: Keepthefaith on December 30, 2008, 09:35:36 PM
When was the last time Kyle was on the Freebird's site??Wingnut?If you can answer..I don't think he's typing anything anymore for a good reason!


It has been awhile since he was banned.  I'm sorry, don't remember exactly when.

So he was Banned!Thanx.Did he mislead those at the Freebird's as well as us here at the Monkey Cage?


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #787 12/24/08 -
Post by: Keepthefaith on December 30, 2008, 09:36:51 PM
When was the last time Kyle was on the Freebird's site??Wingnut?If you can answer..I don't think he's typing anything anymore for a good reason!

He is still typing. he adressed jen's letter line by line and e-mailed it to both Jug and I tonight. I am satisfied with his answers.

Ldstlou.Yes or No.Did Kyle turn over all information before Kermit?

That is to the FBI,and or the Holloway family?


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #787 12/24/08 -
Post by: wingnut on December 30, 2008, 09:44:22 PM
When was the last time Kyle was on the Freebird's site??Wingnut?If you can answer..I don't think he's typing anything anymore for a good reason!


It has been awhile since he was banned.  I'm sorry, don't remember exactly when.

So he was Banned!Thanx.Did he mislead those at the Freebird's as well as us here at the Monkey Cage?


We received legal advice to break contact with him.  And yes - he did mislead us. 



Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #787 12/24/08 -
Post by: Keepthefaith on December 30, 2008, 09:49:44 PM
When was the last time Kyle was on the Freebird's site??Wingnut?If you can answer..I don't think he's typing anything anymore for a good reason!


It has been awhile since he was banned.  I'm sorry, don't remember exactly when.

So he was Banned!Thanx.Did he mislead those at the Freebird's as well as us here at the Monkey Cage?


We received legal advice to break contact with him.  And yes - he did mislead us. 



Thank you!It's good to know that.I'm sure when Kermit comes back it will become even clearer as to why ldstlou is so staunchly defending Kyle?Am i correct in saying that Kyle(OE) did not turn pertinent information over to the Holloway family,and or the FBI in a timely manner as Kermit has said?If True,which i believe it to be.Why defend that?Guess i'll here what Kermit has to say....


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #787 12/24/08 -
Post by: wingnut on December 30, 2008, 09:54:23 PM
When was the last time Kyle was on the Freebird's site??Wingnut?If you can answer..I don't think he's typing anything anymore for a good reason!


It has been awhile since he was banned.  I'm sorry, don't remember exactly when.

So he was Banned!Thanx.Did he mislead those at the Freebird's as well as us here at the Monkey Cage?


We received legal advice to break contact with him.  And yes - he did mislead us. 



Thank you!It's good to know that.I'm sure when Kermit comes back it will become even clearer as to why ldstlou is so staunchly defending Kyle?Am i correct in saying that Kyle(OE) did not turn pertinent information over to the Holloway family,and or the FBI in a timely manner as Kermit has said?If True,which i believe it to be.Why defend that?Guess i'll here what Kermit has to say....


I would think it very easy for lsdstlou to verify with Jug whether Kyle contacted them or not.  I am guessing that lsdstlou has an inside track to Jug? 



Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #787 12/24/08 -
Post by: truthseeker2 on December 30, 2008, 09:57:15 PM
This is a great show Dana is doing tonight.  He and Red and Robin have covered a lot in this one hour.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #787 12/24/08 -
Post by: Keepthefaith on December 30, 2008, 10:00:21 PM
When was the last time Kyle was on the Freebird's site??Wingnut?If you can answer..I don't think he's typing anything anymore for a good reason!


It has been awhile since he was banned.  I'm sorry, don't remember exactly when.

So he was Banned!Thanx.Did he mislead those at the Freebird's as well as us here at the Monkey Cage?


We received legal advice to break contact with him.  And yes - he did mislead us. 



Thank you!It's good to know that.I'm sure when Kermit comes back it will become even clearer as to why ldstlou is so staunchly defending Kyle?Am i correct in saying that Kyle(OE) did not turn pertinent information over to the Holloway family,and or the FBI in a timely manner as Kermit has said?If True,which i believe it to be.Why defend that?Guess i'll here what Kermit has to say....


I would think it very easy for lsdstlou to verify with Jug whether Kyle contacted them or not.  I am guessing that lsdstlou has an inside track to Jug? 



That would lead me to believe that Jug would be aware that Kyle was banned from Freebirds due to Legal reasons?If Jug is aware that he mislead many people,as well as didn't turn this information in a timely manner what is the purpose to defend him in regards to the turning over of pertinent information for ldstlou??It just doesn't make sense to me.. ::MonkeyConfused::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #787 12/24/08 -
Post by: klaasend on December 30, 2008, 10:01:50 PM
On Dana Pretzer

RED - people don't really realize the star power that Dana has had on his show in 2008.  Dana lets them talk and doesn't cut them off. 


Dugga and Red will work on improving things for 2009


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #787 12/24/08 -
Post by: Magnolia on December 30, 2008, 10:02:01 PM
The Freebirds or Kermit sent the last set of photos we saw to
Beth in March.
That is when PI saw them and he posted here about the denim
fabric and Kyle got into a tizzy about how he had seen them.
Kyle had not given the images to the family.  He asked PI
to contact him privately.  We need Janet to post some of
her old stuff.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #787 12/24/08 -
Post by: klaasend on December 30, 2008, 10:02:21 PM
GREAT SHOW DANA, RED AND ROBIN SAX!


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #787 12/24/08 -
Post by: MuffyBee on December 30, 2008, 10:03:17 PM
Great show Dana!   ::MonkeyDance:: ::MonkeyDance::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #787 12/24/08 -
Post by: truthseeker2 on December 30, 2008, 10:04:54 PM
Great show reviewing 2008 on Dana tonight.   ::MonkeyDance::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #787 12/24/08 -
Post by: Keepthefaith on December 30, 2008, 10:05:05 PM
The Freebirds or Kermit sent the last set of photos we saw to
Beth in March.
That is when PI saw them and he posted here about the denim
fabric and Kyle got into a tizzy about how he had seen them.
Kyle had not given the images to the family.  He asked PI
to contact him privately.  We need Janet to post some of
her old stuff.

I trust in what Kermit is saying but am trying to understand why ldstlou is so staunchly defending Kyle when for all intense purposes he has mislead so many?


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #787 12/24/08 -
Post by: klaasend on December 30, 2008, 10:06:57 PM
The Freebirds or Kermit sent the last set of photos we saw to
Beth in March.
That is when PI saw them and he posted here about the denim
fabric and Kyle got into a tizzy about how he had seen them.
Kyle had not given the images to the family.  He asked PI
to contact him privately.  We need Janet to post some of
her old stuff.

See and that's why I wonder about what the family knew and when.  If you were to ask Beth and Jug if they saw the photos they would probably say yes but the real question is WHEN and who sent them the photos?


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #787 12/24/08 -
Post by: Kermit on December 30, 2008, 10:07:28 PM
Tim Miller: In my years of searching we have seen several bodies, skeletal remains--I have seen my own daughter's skeletal remains. I can’t help but believe at this moment that that is human remains in that crab trap.
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/23301056/page/4/

Kyle said: “The brother of the detective came to us and was very persistent over the information.”
Kyle said: "- ”IF a key detective's brother knew the latitude the trap was disposed at or very near, then it's probable the detective knew the same.”

February 2008 – Kyle tried to “strike a deal” with networks for the ROV footage.
March 1, 2008 – The Persistence announced it's return to Louisiana due to lack of money.
March 3, 2008 -  John Silvetti and Caps had a meeting in Aruba.
EMAIL From: Caps Lock
To: XXXXX; Sent: Monday, March 3, 2008 8:05:29 PM
Subject: FW: The meeting will be schedule at 2:00 pm - my house

March 08, 2008, 11:10:26 PM
Caps posted at SM: “I think we all have worked very hard this week and I have not had a chance to enjoy a good laugh since I started with the Monkeys on my research.

I hope tomorrow we will have the final links into a final resolution about the pond. This comming week is THE DAY.

Me and J & W and the C's are all in a agreement now that it must be there”



September 2008 – Freebirds contacted the FBI with the evidence.

10 MONTHS AFTER RETURNING TO THE UNITED STATES
Sunday, November 23, 2008 1:38 PM
Kyle emailed me: “I have recently been in contact with the FBI (within the last two weeks).”

Unless Kyle is a sociopath, which I do not believe, then he did not contact the FBI with the evidence of photos he has in his possession and was aware of during the RV Persistence dives. He did not intend to hand over that evidence until he was forced to do so AFTER The Freebirds contacted the FBI. He specifically stated he did not give any statements to the FBI after his leaving the RV Persistence. He did, however state he had tried to “strike a deal” with the networks executives to sell the ROV footage.

#364 on: Today at 10:54:08 AM   ldstlou
 just called again. Absolutely not true. Beth doesn't know about the theory of the photos or evidence that was collected and not turned over and Jug does not understand why Kermit is even stating this theory or information. Beth did not give Kermit to post photos on her behalf either.
http://scaredmonkeys.net/index.php?topic=4179.360

THE TRUTH IS
Not only do I have the emails from Beth, but also from another family member that confirms Beth's permission for me to expose the Aruba Cover-up.And who called her to try and stop it [/color]

 
Because everything Caps was doing was distracting, and leading away from the cage and always involved the pond which is a  distraction from the cage, I find it interesting to go back over the accumulation of events as they transpired for a refresher.

Keeping in mind that there are several  people at SM who want to believe the pond witness and what CAPS and Kyle have been telling them through John Silvetti.

Keep in mind, Kyle revealed to us that it was John Silvetti  who turned his attention away from the cage and refused to listen to anything Kyle had to say about the cage/trap. Although, it was John Silvetti who allowed the Aruban only divers to collect the evidence which was against what the plan had been.

 The initial plan discussed by the project leads and Aruban police was for us (the team on board the Persistence) to be directly involved in the recovery of the trap
 
#740 on: March 18, 2008, 12:22:38 PM
After the visual inspection on 30-Dec, the initial plan discussed by the project leads and Aruban police was for us (the team on board the Persistence) to be directly involved in the recovery of the trap.  There were talks about getting the proper equipment on board the Persistence such as a suction-recovery system to sift small items from the sand.  The talks continued after Jan-7th when the samples were collected
http://scaredmonkeys.net/index.php?topic=2705.msg366321#msg366321
 
Tim stepped off on or about the 1st of Jan
 
#705 on: November 20, 2008, 07:22:14 PM
Tim Miller was never on the Persistence while I was not on board.  He stepped off on or about the 1st of Jan to follow up on the false lead in Costa Rica IIRC.
http://scaredmonkeys.net/index.php?topic=4153.msg551291#msg551291
 

The talks about recovering the trap ceased around the 10-14th of Jan
 
#662 on: November 20, 2008, 05:21:05 PM
I got off the boat for 4 nights from the 10-14th of Jan for some much needed R&R.  I was in close communication with the boat and continued to post updates.  I didn't need to broadcast my presence on the island at the time.  I observed the vessel at or very near the location on the 11th and 12th for 42 and 45 minutes respectively.  I questioned the possibility of unknown diving ops taking place.  The talks about recovering the trap ceased around that time as well


http://scaredmonkeys.net/index.php?topic=4153.msg551145#msg551145
 
 Now let's follow along with the CAPS information that a group at SM has contact with him and believes in his version of the events and his witness[color]

CAPS  CLAIMS THIS POND CONTAINS A TENNIS SHOE AND HUMAN REMAINS SPECIAL NOTE - ACCORDING TO DAVE HOLLOWAY, CAPS WITNESS HAS MET WITH JOHN SILVETTI OF THE PERSISTENCE BY NOW .
 February 27, 2008
This time they have some special areas that they are checking. It started this morning and continue in the morning.

February 28, 2008:
Yes,
At 9:00 will go over there to amke sure they do not mis a spot....[color-red]The sneaker is there....where is the sneaker is the remains.



Remember Hotshot (Kathy Drenga) just recently told the monkeys that it was HER who directed Caps (and the witness) to Silvetti.
 
Could this REALLY be the first sign to prove the suspicions that Silvetti gave something from that trap to be put in the pond?  Shoe?  Skull? - speculation.



 Hotshot
Re: Natalee Case Discussion #781 12/3/08 -
« Reply #285 on: Today at 12:48:24 AM »

You all seem to jump to conclusions that everything was handed over to the incompetent ALE....... Did you ever stop to think that maybe there was a reason they took off so fast? Do you really think they are that stupid to not cover their butts? Hellooooo, Tim has been through it already, many times. Loose lips do sink ships. Maybe we are not supposed to be discussing those things here for everyone like Aruba to read.[/color]

CAPS STARTS OUT SAYING IT WAS MONTANA POND

January 22, 2008:

Well it says clearley the montana pond.

After this Joran at this time desided to despose of the body in Montana body of water.



January 27, 2008:

but the real body was dumped in a body of water in noord that has not been search

The MUI was a diversion for something else.



The day the search was in noord and the body of water that was search by the police was not to retrieve a body, bud to retrieve something else

The drop has happend but is not the body natalee drop.



February 1, 2008:

In my report I choose the White one but my road is not paved

The Montana Park Apartment is where all started..The Sex etc....

so look for the owners



CAPS BEGINS PLANTING THE SEED OF NEEDING A WITNESS

JaLALA:

The Must Be 2 witness for a conviction... but then they will play the "Not reliable Witness" for one of the witness.

The father can not testified against the son. The mother will Lie. July the reporter got his papers, etc

If no Second Withness, and Not A body, He will Walk

BETWEEN FEB 1 AND FEB 5, CAPS TALKS ABOUT NEEDING A WITNESS. ALSO ABOUT HOW THEY NEVER PUT HER IN THE OCEAN. ALSO ASKING KLAAS RELENTLESSLY IF SHE'S HEARD BACK FROM DAVE YET - ABOUT HIS EMAIL TO DAVE IN DECEMBER



NOW INTRODUCES THE WHITEHOUSE - WHICH IS NEAR MOKO POND

February 5, 2008



They mus have gone to this planned rave party at the Whitehouse. where she was raped and died.

THEN A WITNESS APPEARS TO CAPS. THE ANSWER TO HIS CONSTANT REMINDER TO MONKEYS THAT WE NEED ONE. NOTE THE WITNESS FIRST CLAIMS A TIME OF 3:44 AM

February 8, 2008
I know,

a Midnight aowl (SHOCO) saw him from his veranda at 3:44 passing in fornt of his house....All in muddy from the wate down....

Have new google earth.



CAPS FINALLY HEARS BACK FROM DAVE - AND AT THIS POINT, HE IS STILL DISCUSSING BOTH MOKO AND MONTANA - NO MENTION AT THIS POINT OF MONSERAT POND



February 16, 2008



Klaasend:

Did got Email from the man, He know nows and Understand.



ON THIS SAME DATE - CAPS NOW CLAIMS THIS WITNESS WAS MOVING AROUND, ENOUGH TO KNOW SECURITY WAS PATROLLING AND CAMERAS ROLLING



The witness state that the Bird was constantly moving in circle around the area that night..

and the bird normaly will wake you up and one will tent to go look up in the sky of what is going on. and wonder.

some take pictures. If picture was taken, the Man in the bird with his power beam will see you taken pictures. and can zoom in to see who you are.

CAPS TELLS US HIS UNCLE IS AN ATTORNEY

Yes the government has his own set of lawyers and only work for the Government.

The Lawyers also represents a group that work hand in hand with the OM.


I was wondering which lawyer was on the Roll that night to handel the cases.

On the Roll means (schedule) How I know this is that my uncle is a Lawyer and He always talk abaout to have Roll duty.

It means that he is on the evening list to handel cases comming in that night. it can also be a sub prosecuter.



NOW THE TIME THE WITNESS CLAIMS HAS CHANGED. WHY WAS THIS DONE? DID THEY REALIZE THE FIRST TIME STATED DIDN'T WORK WITH THE KNOWN TIMELINE?

February 23, 2008



CAPS say: 4:05 AM Joran passing in front of a witness house dirty and missing the Right shoe



NOW ENTER THE PERSISTENCE SEARCH OF THE POND. BUT WAIT, IT'S NEITHER OF THE PONDS CAPS HAS PREVIOUSLY CLAIMED - THEY SEARCH THE MONSERRAT POND

CAPS ALSO CLAIMS THIS POND CONTAINS A TENNIS SHOE AND HUMAN REMAINS

SPECIAL NOTE - ACCORDING TO DAVE HOLLOWAY, CAPS WITNESS HAS MET WITH JOHN SILVETTI OF THE PERSISTENCE BY NOW



February 27, 2008



This time they have some special areas that they are checking. It started this morning and continue in the morning.

February 28, 2008:



Yes,

At 9:00 will go over there to amke sure they do not mis a spot....The sneaker is there....where is the sneaker is the remains.



http://www.bondia.com/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=858&Itemid=1

Grupo di barco Mericano “Persistance” ta busca den dam na Montserat
Thursday, 28 February 2008

ORANJESTAD - Grupo di e barco Mericano “Persistance” ayera a dicidi di drenta dam na Montserat pa asina wak si nan por haya algo. Nan a pone un sonar ultra sofistica cu a base di un software ta lagabo wak tur cos cu tin tanto den e awa cu den e lodo den un forma tridimencional. Aunke cu e dam ta sumamente seco toch a logra haci un trabou amplio pa asina wak si por encontra algo di Nathalie Holloway. Despues di analisa tur e graphiconan cu nan a logra compila den e dam lo bai wak si ta yega na algo of no.





Quote from: oceanexploration on February 28, 2008, 03:34:45 PM


This is two of our crew out surveying the pond yesterday (27-Feb). They are using a SonaVision scanning sonar. The sonar scans 360 degrees out to a user select range. In this case we used between 50-100ft range. By placing multiple "drops" approximately 75-100 ft apart you can quickly and efficiently scan an entire pond.
I must have a good laught at this one. The boat they are in is TINY and Tony is a big guy.



DESTINY ASKING THE MONKEYS IF SHE SHOULD SEND FISH TRAP PHOTOS POSTED BY ROBIN H TO ARUBAN COPS - CAPS TELLING HER NO WAY, SEVERAL TIMES - EVEN WARNS DESTINY TO BE FEARFUL FOR HERSELF IF SHE DOES



February 28, 2008:

You are right LALA, they have a room full of intell person sitting and listeting and watching..I know this for a fact.

I say do not make a move.

Want to play it safe...tell them that your computer got a Virus...had to be reformatted. everything is lost.

We live in a digital world where loosing a bit is not much but for safegaurd one self..

The new MOSvirus.irc just eat your hard disk and you are foregiven.

Lay low for a couple of days and back on track

CAPS



Do not sent anything...

I know that for a fact that if they know who you are they will fabricate any thing to put you away....I know that for a fact...so be carfull....

BTW, they have all information them self....They are the one that is playing in the band.

now they have lost a band string and they want to compare....

Shango would say DO NOT TSURT....bad move....you will not win if you show your playing cards.



CAPS REVEALS HE HAS A BROTHER WORKING WITH EITHER LAW ENFORCEMENT OR THE PROSECUTOR'S OFFICE



Klaasend:

watch the news of tomorrow on what the comments are today from Hans MOS...He is pisst on the search in Monserat. My bother was telling me that MOS want to know all the detail and how they came about to that area.

...Hmmmmm..

I was not there to listen to the news today...but MOS is upset....



CAPS VISITS THE POND HIMSELF

February 28, 2008:





Well I did not know till I check where the pipes are leading to.

I will have picture of the pipes tomorrow.

to get in the pipes, one must put on a coverall becuase you will get dirty and it is very dark and a long walk. to the other end.

I need big light to check these pipes.

when the pond fills up, all the debry stay in the pond only the water will move to the other end in another waterbasin. I never know about this but my dad has clearyfy it. The rain water will move to another water basin. anything large and havy will stay in the pipe since the water flow is not strong. The flow only start when the pond fills-up.

Will check it but it has a horrable stenge.

I will take some picture to compare.

THE DAY CAPS VISITS THE POND, CAPS NOW STATES THERE COULD BE HUMAN REMAINS IN MONSERAT POND, AND ALSO HUMAN REMAINS IN MOKO POND - WHICH TIES IN WITH HIS EARLIER ASSERTIONS OF THE WHITEHOUSE APARTMENTS.

KEEP REMEMBERING THAT THIS WITNESS OF CAPS HAS BY NOW MET WITH JOHN SILVETTI


February 29, 2008

The problem with Moko pool is that if they dump the body in there, this acctiion leave Joran walking home. and not to the McDonnald.

Now lets assume that what is said that the head was not part of the body no more, and that both places has been used.

The Moko Pool which is right at the doorstep of the Whitehouse Apartment and there they could have dumb a peace of the body then drive Joran to the Monserat Pool and split leaving Joran alone.

Driving to the Monserat they will dump an other peace of the body.
Split and leave Joran behind.
The Monserat pool will leave him walking to McDonald.

This will give both Simian and Shango Validity for their writtings.

BRB..
CAPS
 
 CAPS ACCUSING KERMIT OF LYING
Posted this at SM:
 
Kermit: why are you stir the monkey cage by lying....I never siad the Moko nor Montanja but the Monserat pond.


CAPS ADMITS TO DIVING AT THE CAGE/TRAP

”I went to dive a week a go to the same location, and the Cage is still there. If the cage was evidance in a murder case, why is it still in the water.”

MARCH 1 CAPS SAYS CAGE IS A POST OFFICE
(remember March 1 is when it was announced that the RV Persistence was returning home AND March 3 is when John Silvetti met with CAPS).
  http://scaredmonkeys.net/index.php?topic=2662.msg358441#msg358441


MARCH 3, 2008 – John Silvetti meets with CapsLockWizard

From an email sent from CapsLockWizard:
“Yes, We did have the meeting today. It was a long meeting and we are all set to start the process of a permit to drain. Witness will gave statement to Lawyer (Helen), Lawyer will motion to drain the pond to OM. If Motion denied, will go to media and expose more dirt. John knows everything now and he will stay behind to help and protect. John state the cage was empty. it was full of these broken plastic bags that shows on the cam like skull, but he said to me it is the water doing tricks when picture was taken. He thinks also it is a postoffice. When I told him the story about the cage, he also understand now some things that he could not have question about. Like why is the Panter allways parked over the spot while there is notting anymore in he cage. The meeting end at 5:00 pm and was very good. About the Pipes. They will be checked. Also John thinks that the signs are there but need to drain the pond. Also Withness is 99% it was some one that came from the pond area that he saw, because it looks like a dutch man and was cover in mud from the chest down.”


 WHO CONTACTED CAPS?
Re: Natalee Case Discussion #715 1/25 -
« Reply #407 on: January 27, 2008, 12:17:04 PM
Caps are you from aruba?  A friend of mine that I talk to there, also talks like you do is only why I ask......  TIA
http://scaredmonkeys.net/index.php?topic=2539.msg333009#msg333009


AND SHE CONTACTED KYLE:
Hi there, and good to see you here at the SM site.  It was me who sent that cryptic message to your blog, [color]sorry about all that.  Its just one of the things that we dealt with here early on in the case.  It looked to be someone in the know.  You can take it down if you wish, I just thought it might be of some help.  But once again, I praise the work you guys are doing, and wish I could be there myself to help with the search.  My prayers are with all of you for a great outcome.  Hey, remember, there really are pirates out there!
http://scaredmonkeys.net/index.php?topic=2429.msg315194#msg315194

how would she possibly know this unless she has been in contact with Kyle
 
March 07, 2008, 12:54:54 PM
There are no doors on the back of the huts.  I can vouch for that.  All doors on the front.   http://i67.photobucket.com/albums/h294/gummy_2006/hutcollage.jpg   Kyle has taken some of the same pictures I took while over there.[color]  The new wood door, is the hut that was broken into.
--------------------------------------


John did go back to work with CAPS 2 times that I know of, to Aruba, about the Monstart pond.  He was with CAPS the whole time
http://scaredmonkeys.net/index.php?topic=4173.msg555976#msg555976

853 on: December 08, 2008, 03:05:43 PM   hotshot
I have spoken to Mr Silvetti twice.  And that was only to see if he wanted help with the pond and the search.  I would have gone to help.  do i know him personally, no.  The only information i know is from kyle or dave, and no i was not in the private forum.  You guys brought over a quote stating that kyle says john said.... tim was not needed anymore, he is a liability.  Correct?
Just answering
http://scaredmonkeys.net/index.php?topic=4216.msg571886#msg571886


AND SHE CONTACTED JOHN SILVITTI
HotShot: SM  Reply #687 on: December 04, 2008, 06:42:20 PM »
 “[color=red}I personally have met with Tim, and Schafer way back in Jan of 2006 back when they were trying to get things going with the Persistence, and getting the OK to go to Aruban waters.  It was several of us that met with them.













WHO IS DEFENDING KYLE AND CAPS?/b]

Now, if we remember Kathy Drenga (Hotshot)  - she is the one that went to Aruba with BestBuddy & uploaded the Aru-bay videos to her website and the photos of the Lions Den. THEN she is the one that felt Natalee was buried in the cometary. THEN she thought she was in the BAG that Blonde found and that photo was seen in National Enquirer. THEN Kathy Drenga (Hotshot) started talking with Kyle and also CAPS.

as I'm reading back through ALL her posts, I'm see a picture. She is FEEDING CAPS information.That is why we see CAPS post she is in the MOKO (Kathy posted about the MOKO too), then he changes it to Montajan then the cemetery etc etc.

She sets it up for CAPS to go meet John Silvetti after contacting Kyle and from there CAPS story changes like the wind just like hers.

#902 on: July 11, 2006, 05:39:05 PM Hotshot:
I just feel those ponds that "WONT" be searched is a place that needs to be.  They know they cant drain them, too much water, and they know they cant dive them, too murky.  They are not dumb, but like to play dumb.  Don't forget they got a hit with the dogs at one, but couldn't do anything about it
http://scaredmonkeys.net/index.php?topic=63.msg13147#msg13147

REMEMBER THIS:
CAPS  CLAIMS THIS POND CONTAINS A TENNIS SHOE AND HUMAN REMAINS SPECIAL NOTE - ACCORDING TO DAVE HOLLOWAY, CAPS WITNESS HAS MET WITH JOHN SILVETTI OF THE PERSISTENCE BY NOW

Hotshot:
Don't know, but that mud would eat his shoes for sure.
http://scaredmonkeys.net/index.php?topic=164.msg31737#msg31737


Hotshot: “You guys are going to look really silly in the end for downing the people like silvetti, and Kyle, and CAPS.”
http://scaredmonkeys.net/index.php?topic=4186.msg565899#msg565899


Idstlou

213 on: September 22, 2008, 10:04:02 AM   ldstlou
Lalas!!! Our friend just called you back and you didn't answer!!! lol
Can you call him back now. 
http://scaredmonkeys.net/index.php?topic=3390.200
 
lalasmom
 #231 on: September 22, 2008, 11:25:48 AM   lalasmom
Sorry!!  So sorry!! LOL  Will do...give me a minute...I was talking to my kid.  Sorry!
http://scaredmonkeys.net/index.php?topic=3390.220
 
 
#410 on: September 23, 2008, 08:56:12 AM   ldstlou
Lalas!! your phone is ringing!!   

trying to caaaaall you!!! lol 
http://scaredmonkeys.net/index.php?topic=3390.msg467158#msg467158
 
413 on: September 23, 2008, 09:03:27 AM  lalassmom
No it's not!  LOL  Try again.
http://scaredmonkeys.net/index.php?topic=3390.msg467158#msg467158
 
 
#344 on: September 22, 2008, 09:20:45 PM   lalasmom
So Tim Miller and John Silvetti are the ones that made arrangements for Caps witness to come to the USA and take the polygraph.  Mos was a bit upset.  Why am I not surprised?
http://scaredmonkeys.net/index.php?topic=3390.340

lalas here/attachment/don't delete
Thursday, January 31, 2008 8:16 AM
Capslockwizard info.
[Note: This was the email to Dave Holloway]


Yapperz
 #476 on: Today at 10:18:37 PM  yapperz
Tamikosmom posted:
<snip>
Yap ... do you have information to the contrary.

Janet

______


Janet, actually I do. I would rather not go in to it here. You are welcome to get my email address from Klaas.
 










Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #787 12/24/08 -
Post by: BUCKSHOT on December 30, 2008, 10:08:13 PM
Ldstlou seems to be defending/protecting an agenda to me. However, does not seem to be alone. It is very obvious to me. Whose agenda are they defending/protecting, if any, and why?  I can not understand. Help me.

Kyle (OE) has posted here freely in the past. He has gone to great lengths to explain as well as volunteer information. He is more than capable to refute anything that he feels is being incorrectly portrayed about him or his involvement. Why would he not do the same now? Kinda makes you wonder...

Kermit has posted here and backed up her posts with facts. Furthermore, she has answered any relevant questions, concerning her posts. I anxiously await each installment given to us by her. For those who disagree with her and the information she provides, give us facts (not fiction or speculation) that disprove her. Quite simple...

The truth seems easy to defend. Bullshit seems harder to defend. Just my humble opinion..

Please do not attack me. Like everyone, I am entitled to my opinion. My skin is thick so save your breath...


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #787 12/24/08 -
Post by: Keepthefaith on December 30, 2008, 10:08:21 PM
The Freebirds or Kermit sent the last set of photos we saw to
Beth in March.
That is when PI saw them and he posted here about the denim
fabric and Kyle got into a tizzy about how he had seen them.
Kyle had not given the images to the family.  He asked PI
to contact him privately.  We need Janet to post some of
her old stuff.

See and that's why I wonder about what the family knew and when.  If you were to ask Beth and Jug if they saw the photos they would probably say yes but the real question is WHEN and who sent them the photos?

When was Kyle banned from Freebirds Wingnut?If you can answer!TIA


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #787 12/24/08 -
Post by: Kermit on December 30, 2008, 10:11:34 PM
The Freebirds or Kermit sent the last set of photos we saw to
Beth in March.
That is when PI saw them and he posted here about the denim
fabric and Kyle got into a tizzy about how he had seen them.
Kyle had not given the images to the family.  He asked PI
to contact him privately.  We need Janet to post some of
her old stuff.

See and that's why I wonder about what the family knew and when.  If you were to ask Beth and Jug if they saw the photos they would probably say yes but the real question is WHEN and who sent them the photos?

I tried to contact Beth about the photos. She was out of town and I asked her sister-in-law to contact her. I know John emailed her too. No one could get ahold of her at that time. Weeks later I was able to send her the photos with the statements and evidence.  I got permission from here to  exposed the Aruba cover-up.
Had nothing to do with Kyle as some infer. I only want Aruba to give Natalee back to her family NOW!
I could care less what Kyle or John Silvetti do to live with themselves. Or anyone that protects criminal evidence.




Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #787 12/24/08 -
Post by: Red on December 30, 2008, 10:18:45 PM
GREAT SHOW DANA, RED AND ROBIN SAX!

So many things are going thru your head when doing an interview like that and so little time to expand on your thoughts.

However, I would be remiss if I did not give a huge shout out and thank you to Klaas.  ::MonkeyDance:: Thank you for all you do.  ::MonkeyDance::

A special thanks to all the SM mods of 2008 ... you rock.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #787 12/24/08 -
Post by: BUCKSHOT on December 30, 2008, 10:19:06 PM
When was the last time Kyle was on the Freebird's site??Wingnut?If you can answer..I don't think he's typing anything anymore for a good reason!


It has been awhile since he was banned.  I'm sorry, don't remember exactly when.

So he was Banned!Thanx.Did he mislead those at the Freebird's as well as us here at the Monkey Cage?


We received legal advice to break contact with him.  And yes - he did mislead us. 



Thank you!It's good to know that.I'm sure when Kermit comes back it will become even clearer as to why ldstlou is so staunchly defending Kyle?Am i correct in saying that Kyle(OE) did not turn pertinent information over to the Holloway family,and or the FBI in a timely manner as Kermit has said?If True,which i believe it to be.Why defend that?Guess i'll here what Kermit has to say....


I would think it very easy for lsdstlou to verify with Jug whether Kyle contacted them or not.  I am guessing that lsdstlou has an inside track to Jug?  



Wingnut, Jen - Welcome aboard.

Me personally...I question this connection...

Think about it...If lsdstlou presents information to the Holloway family, information that seriously raises eyebrows to anyone...Why so cavalier in reporting back that the family dismisses it as bullshit. All that this family has endured and they simply dismiss this as bullshit without asking questions, without proving or disproving...I simply find it hard to believe.

Either:
(1) The "jug" referred to as getting the information is a jug of rotten apple cider
(2) The trap situation is part of a major "behind the scenes" endeavor on the part of the family and must be kept quiet/denied knowledge about until the right time, and only the right time.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #787 12/24/08 -
Post by: San on December 30, 2008, 10:24:27 PM
GREAT SHOW DANA, RED AND ROBIN SAX!

So many things are going thru your head when doing an interview like that and so little time to expand on your thoughts.

However, I would be remiss if I did not give a huge shout out and thank you to Klaas.  ::MonkeyDance:: Thank you for all you do.  ::MonkeyDance::

A special thanks to all the SM mods of 2008 ... you rock.

Klaas is the best.  And no I'm not getting a puppy  ::MonkeyHaHa::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #787 12/24/08 -
Post by: San on December 30, 2008, 10:26:30 PM
Ldstlou seems to be defending/protecting an agenda to me. However, does not seem to be alone. It is very obvious to me. Whose agenda are they defending/protecting, if any, and why?  I can not understand. Help me.

Kyle (OE) has posted here freely in the past. He has gone to great lengths to explain as well as volunteer information. He is more than capable to refute anything that he feels is being incorrectly portrayed about him or his involvement. Why would he not do the same now? Kinda makes you wonder...

Kermit has posted here and backed up her posts with facts. Furthermore, she has answered any relevant questions, concerning her posts. I anxiously await each installment given to us by her. For those who disagree with her and the information she provides, give us facts (not fiction or speculation) that disprove her. Quite simple...

The truth seems easy to defend. Bullshit seems harder to defend. Just my humble opinion..

Please do not attack me. Like everyone, I am entitled to my opinion. My skin is thick so save your breath...

No attacks from me because I agree.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #787 12/24/08 -
Post by: MuffyBee on December 30, 2008, 10:27:05 PM
GREAT SHOW DANA, RED AND ROBIN SAX!

So many things are going thru your head when doing an interview like that and so little time to expand on your thoughts.

However, I would be remiss if I did not give a huge shout out and thank you to Klaas.  ::MonkeyDance:: Thank you for all you do.  ::MonkeyDance::

A special thanks to all the SM mods of 2008 ... you rock.

Klaas is the best.  And no I'm not getting a puppy  ::MonkeyHaHa::

I agree.  Klaas is the very best
::MonkeyDance:: 


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #787 12/24/08 -
Post by: MumInOhio on December 30, 2008, 10:31:41 PM
Kermit..

A lot of what you have posted is a bunch of cut and posted posts from Shango...It is totally incorrect and out of context.

And those that aren't familiar with Shango may buy it...

Shame on you!!!!!!!!!

Thank You for replying to my question from your last visit I see you were not in direct email contact with Caps...

God himself only knows what the heck you are trying to imply with Lalas and Lisa as I didn't bother to read it.






Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #787 12/24/08 -
Post by: 2NJSons_Mom on December 30, 2008, 10:31:53 PM
GREAT SHOW DANA, RED AND ROBIN SAX!

So many things are going thru your head when doing an interview like that and so little time to expand on your thoughts.

However, I would be remiss if I did not give a huge shout out and thank you to Klaas.  ::MonkeyDance:: Thank you for all you do.  ::MonkeyDance::

A special thanks to all the SM mods of 2008 ... you rock.

Klaas is the best.  And no I'm not getting a puppy  ::MonkeyHaHa::

Yes, KLAAS is the BEST


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #787 12/24/08 -
Post by: Keepthefaith on December 30, 2008, 10:35:55 PM
Kermit..

A lot of what you have posted is a bunch of cut and posted posts from Shango...It is totally incorrect and out of context.

And those that aren't familiar with Shango may buy it...

Shame on you!!!!!!!!!

Thank You for replying to my question from your last visit I see you were not in direct email contact with Caps...

God himself only knows what the heck you are trying to imply with Lalas and Lisa as I didn't bother to read it.






So you don't believe Kermit Mum?


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #787 12/24/08 -
Post by: BUCKSHOT on December 30, 2008, 10:43:55 PM
After reading Kermit's most recent post, I have a few questions..
(1) Is latest pond witness (the one who claimed to have seen Joran walking with one shoe, out of breath, and muddy while a red jeep picked him up) fabricated (by Caps) and not to be believed?
(2) If so, why would this person then take lie detector tests and supposedly pass them?


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #787 12/24/08 -
Post by: KYcat on December 30, 2008, 10:57:24 PM
After reading Kermit's most recent post, I have a few questions..
(1) Is latest pond witness (the one who claimed to have seen Joran walking with one shoe, out of breath, and muddy while a red jeep picked him up) fabricated (by Caps) and not to be believed?
(2) If so, why would this person then take lie detector tests and supposedly pass them?


Well, here goes my 2cents worth.  I posted my misgivings regarding Kyle this morning in this thread.  I received no response but my thoughts have been mirrored by several here so I won't go into it.  I have asked this before, maybe someone can answer now.  Where is this witness?  Why have we not heard anything from him/her?  We were promised more info regarding this from CAPS.  Where is it?  What about part 2, 3, 4, etc. of the Diario articles?  I just want these people to deliver on what they say they will.  Promised so much, given so little. 

Rant over.  By the way, Buckshot, I agree with you, for what it is worth.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #787 12/24/08 -
Post by: texasmom on December 30, 2008, 10:58:26 PM
GREAT SHOW DANA, RED AND ROBIN SAX!

So many things are going thru your head when doing an interview like that and so little time to expand on your thoughts.

However, I would be remiss if I did not give a huge shout out and thank you to Klaas.  ::MonkeyDance:: Thank you for all you do.  ::MonkeyDance::

A special thanks to all the SM mods of 2008 ... you rock.

Klaas is the best.  And no I'm not getting a puppy  ::MonkeyHaHa::

Yes, KLAAS is the BEST

I agree with all of you!!!!!

KLAAS is the BEST!!!!!  ALL of our mods here are GREAT, and I appreciate each and every one of you!!!!!

THANK YOU FOR ALL YOU DO!!!!!


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #787 12/24/08 -
Post by: KYcat on December 30, 2008, 10:59:27 PM
Forgive my manners.  Welcome to the new kids on the block!  Wingnut, Jen, WELCOME.  Very much appreciate your input and the letter that was brought over and posted by Klass.  Again, thank you.

 ::MonkeyDance::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #787 12/24/08 -
Post by: klaasend on December 30, 2008, 10:59:51 PM
After reading Kermit's most recent post, I have a few questions..
(1) Is latest pond witness (the one who claimed to have seen Joran walking with one shoe, out of breath, and muddy while a red jeep picked him up) fabricated (by Caps) and not to be believed?
(2) If so, why would this person then take lie detector tests and supposedly pass them?


Good questions

http://www.wikihow.com/Cheat-a-Polygraph-Test-(Lie-Detector)


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #787 12/24/08 -
Post by: Keepthefaith on December 30, 2008, 11:02:41 PM
After reading Kermit's most recent post, I have a few questions..
(1) Is latest pond witness (the one who claimed to have seen Joran walking with one shoe, out of breath, and muddy while a red jeep picked him up) fabricated (by Caps) and not to be believed?
(2) If so, why would this person then take lie detector tests and supposedly pass them?


Well, here goes my 2cents worth.  I posted my misgivings regarding Kyle this morning in this thread.  I received no response but my thoughts have been mirrored by several here so I won't go into it.  I have asked this before, maybe someone can answer now.  Where is this witness?  Why have we not heard anything from him/her?  We were promised more info regarding this from CAPS.  Where is it?  What about part 2, 3, 4, etc. of the Diario articles?  I just want these people to deliver on what they say they will.  Promised so much, given so little. 

Rant over.  By the way, Buckshot, I agree with you, for what it is worth.


I stand with the Frog!Kyle (OE) is free to speak here.Anyone wanna back up what they're saying with facts i'm sure all Monkey's are all ears.I'm tired of bashing Kermit with nothing to substantiate it...


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #787 12/24/08 -
Post by: Keepthefaith on December 30, 2008, 11:03:52 PM
After reading Kermit's most recent post, I have a few questions..
(1) Is latest pond witness (the one who claimed to have seen Joran walking with one shoe, out of breath, and muddy while a red jeep picked him up) fabricated (by Caps) and not to be believed?
(2) If so, why would this person then take lie detector tests and supposedly pass them?


Well, here goes my 2cents worth.  I posted my misgivings regarding Kyle this morning in this thread.  I received no response but my thoughts have been mirrored by several here so I won't go into it.  I have asked this before, maybe someone can answer now.  Where is this witness?  Why have we not heard anything from him/her?  We were promised more info regarding this from CAPS.  Where is it?  What about part 2, 3, 4, etc. of the Diario articles?  I just want these people to deliver on what they say they will.  Promised so much, given so little. 

Rant over.  By the way, Buckshot, I agree with you, for what it is worth.


I stand with the Frog!Kyle (OE) is free to speak here.Anyone wanna back up what they're saying with facts i'm sure all Monkey's are all ears.I'm tired of the bashing of Kermit with nothing to substantiate it...

I stand corrected


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #787 12/24/08 -
Post by: Kermit on December 30, 2008, 11:04:13 PM
Kermit..

A lot of what you have posted is a bunch of cut and posted posts from Shango...It is totally incorrect and out of context.

And those that aren't familiar with Shango may buy it...

Shame on you!!!!!!!!!

Thank You for replying to my question from your last visit I see you were not in direct email contact with Caps...

God himself only knows what the heck you are trying to imply with Lalas and Lisa as I didn't bother to read it.







((edit - ok, you have proved you have emails from Capslock - it's not appropriate to post private emails though)))  
 
 
 


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #787 12/24/08 -
Post by: Magnolia on December 30, 2008, 11:04:14 PM
After reading Kermit's most recent post, I have a few questions..
(1) Is latest pond witness (the one who claimed to have seen Joran walking with one shoe, out of breath, and muddy while a red jeep picked him up) fabricated (by Caps) and not to be believed?
(2) If so, why would this person then take lie detector tests and supposedly pass them?


Money.

It seems to me that there may be a behind the scenes scheme to
try to return Natalee's remains to her family without implicating
Silvetti and the Persistence crew in covering up what was in the
fish cage.

That would explain Caps and Hotshot's involvement with Silvetti.
If Caps has a brother in ALE he might have access to the remains
and could steal them away to be discovered wherever Caps and
Silvetti decide to place them. 

This is pure speculation on my part.

I think ldstlou and Hotshot are friends.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #787 12/24/08 -
Post by: San on December 30, 2008, 11:04:40 PM
After reading Kermit's most recent post, I have a few questions..
(1) Is latest pond witness (the one who claimed to have seen Joran walking with one shoe, out of breath, and muddy while a red jeep picked him up) fabricated (by Caps) and not to be believed?
(2) If so, why would this person then take lie detector tests and supposedly pass them?


Well, here goes my 2cents worth.  I posted my misgivings regarding Kyle this morning in this thread.  I received no response but my thoughts have been mirrored by several here so I won't go into it.  I have asked this before, maybe someone can answer now.  Where is this witness?  Why have we not heard anything from him/her?  We were promised more info regarding this from CAPS.  Where is it?  What about part 2, 3, 4, etc. of the Diario articles?  I just want these people to deliver on what they say they will.  Promised so much, given so little. 

Rant over.  By the way, Buckshot, I agree with you, for what it is worth.


These are all good questions.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #787 12/24/08 -
Post by: Kermit on December 30, 2008, 11:07:37 PM
Wednesday, September 10, 2008 6:48 PM
From:  edited
Add sender to Contacts
To:
kermit

kermit....i am in your corner. and the only reason i called beth this morning is because yap was concerned that the timing of the document would hurt tim miller. so i called and left an urgent message. she was at work, but called on her break. she said she told you sure, go ahead and post the pics. you did everything the right way.[/u]






Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #787 12/24/08 -
Post by: KYcat on December 30, 2008, 11:08:00 PM
After reading Kermit's most recent post, I have a few questions..
(1) Is latest pond witness (the one who claimed to have seen Joran walking with one shoe, out of breath, and muddy while a red jeep picked him up) fabricated (by Caps) and not to be believed?
(2) If so, why would this person then take lie detector tests and supposedly pass them?


Well, here goes my 2cents worth.  I posted my misgivings regarding Kyle this morning in this thread.  I received no response but my thoughts have been mirrored by several here so I won't go into it.  I have asked this before, maybe someone can answer now.  Where is this witness?  Why have we not heard anything from him/her?  We were promised more info regarding this from CAPS.  Where is it?  What about part 2, 3, 4, etc. of the Diario articles?  I just want these people to deliver on what they say they will.  Promised so much, given so little. 

Rant over.  By the way, Buckshot, I agree with you, for what it is worth.


I stand with the Frog!Kyle (OE) is free to speak here.Anyone wanna back up what they're saying with facts i'm sure all Monkey's are all ears.I'm tired of the bashing of Kermit with nothing to substantiate it...

I stand corrected

I am confused.  How do you stand corrected?   ::MonkeyEek::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #787 12/24/08 -
Post by: 2NJSons_Mom on December 30, 2008, 11:10:14 PM
I knew what you meant, KeeptheFaith, without the correction.   ::MonkeyWink::

How did Mum know who Kermit was referring to????  I didn't have that equation right.  Must be an underground thing I'm not privy to.    :smt102


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #787 12/24/08 -
Post by: Keepthefaith on December 30, 2008, 11:11:49 PM
After reading Kermit's most recent post, I have a few questions..
(1) Is latest pond witness (the one who claimed to have seen Joran walking with one shoe, out of breath, and muddy while a red jeep picked him up) fabricated (by Caps) and not to be believed?
(2) If so, why would this person then take lie detector tests and supposedly pass them?


Well, here goes my 2cents worth.  I posted my misgivings regarding Kyle this morning in this thread.  I received no response but my thoughts have been mirrored by several here so I won't go into it.  I have asked this before, maybe someone can answer now.  Where is this witness?  Why have we not heard anything from him/her?  We were promised more info regarding this from CAPS.  Where is it?  What about part 2, 3, 4, etc. of the Diario articles?  I just want these people to deliver on what they say they will.  Promised so much, given so little. 

Rant over.  By the way, Buckshot, I agree with you, for what it is worth.


I stand with the Frog!Kyle (OE) is free to speak here.Anyone wanna back up what they're saying with facts i'm sure all Monkey's are all ears.I'm tired of the bashing of Kermit with nothing to substantiate it...

I stand corrected

I am confused.  How do you stand corrected?   ::MonkeyEek::

I said i was tired of bashing Kermit when i meant i'm tired of Kermit being bashed without anyone anyone backing it up!Make sense??Sorry head is spinnin from both Natalee,as well as Caylee..


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #787 12/24/08 -
Post by: Hotshot on December 30, 2008, 11:12:08 PM

Quote
Remember Hotshot (Kathy Drenga) just recently told the monkeys that it was HER who directed Caps (and the witness) to Silvetti.
 
 Hotshot
Re: Natalee Case Discussion #781 12/3/08 -
« Reply #285 on: Today at 12:48:24 AM »

You all seem to jump to conclusions that everything was handed over to the incompetent ALE....... Did you ever stop to think that maybe there was a reason they took off so fast? Do you really think they are that stupid to not cover their butts? Hellooooo, Tim has been through it already, many times. Loose lips do sink ships. Maybe we are not supposed to be discussing those things here for everyone like Aruba to read.

OK, this is  really bad taste......And if you edit this prior to taking my last name out of every quote i  am going to be really pissed. ((edit)) can't get away with this, and then not assume I will not post her name.. Dave did not  know all of this was going on here, he is not a happy camper.  Will post more tomorrow, i need sleep.


Hothot - you have posted your real life name in the open, others have not.  I really have to scratch my head at all the people that have found a need to be in contact with Dave, Beth, Jug, etc.  I'm not talking about just you Hotshot, I'm talking about everyone. (klaasend)


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #787 12/24/08 -
Post by: billb's daughter on December 30, 2008, 11:13:10 PM
Kermit..

A lot of what you have posted is a bunch of cut and posted posts from Shango...It is totally incorrect and out of context.

And those that aren't familiar with Shango may buy it...

Shame on you!!!!!!!!!

Thank You for replying to my question from your last visit I see you were not in direct email contact with Caps...
Mum,
I've always looked forward to you posts and respect the analysis you provide.
but....your comment seems to come right out of the blue..
What is totally incorrect and out of context?
thanks, billb

God himself only knows what the heck you are trying to imply with Lalas and Lisa as I didn't bother to read it.







Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #787 12/24/08 -
Post by: billb's daughter on December 30, 2008, 11:15:05 PM
Kermit..

A lot of what you have posted is a bunch of cut and posted posts from Shango...It is totally incorrect and out of context.

And those that aren't familiar with Shango may buy it...

Shame on you!!!!!!!!!

Thank You for replying to my question from your last visit I see you were not in direct email contact with Caps...

God himself only knows what the heck you are trying to imply with Lalas and Lisa as I didn't bother to read it.





Messed that up... ::MonkeyShocked::
Mum,
I've always looked forward to you posts and respect the analysis you provide.
but....your comment seems to come right out of the blue..
What is totally incorrect and out of context?
thanks, billb


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #787 12/24/08 -
Post by: Hotshot on December 30, 2008, 11:17:21 PM
Quote
WHO IS DEFENDING KYLE AND CAPS?/b]

Now, if we remember Kathy Drenga (Hotshot)  - she is the one that went to Aruba with BestBuddy & uploaded the Aru-bay videos to her website and the photos of the Lions Den. THEN she is the one that felt Natalee was buried in the cometary. THEN she thought she was in the BAG that Blonde found and that photo was seen in National Enquirer. THEN Kathy Drenga (Hotshot) started talking with Kyle and also CAPS.
She is in the bag, and if you cant see that, i am sorry.  it is plain as day. joran himself says  he put her in the  mangroves, yeah after putting her  in a bag....Shes not been in only one place, we all know that.  And yes i did send CAPS to john,  what of it?


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #787 12/24/08 -
Post by: BUCKSHOT on December 30, 2008, 11:20:53 PM
After reading Kermit's most recent post, I have a few questions..
(1) Is latest pond witness (the one who claimed to have seen Joran walking with one shoe, out of breath, and muddy while a red jeep picked him up) fabricated (by Caps) and not to be believed?
(2) If so, why would this person then take lie detector tests and supposedly pass them?


Money.

It seems to me that there may be a behind the scenes scheme to
try to return Natalee's remains to her family without implicating
Silvetti and the Persistence crew in covering up what was in the
fish cage.

That would explain Caps and Hotshot's involvement with Silvetti.
If Caps has a brother in ALE he might have access to the remains
and could steal them away to be discovered wherever Caps and
Silvetti decide to place them. 

This is pure speculation on my part.

I think ldstlou and Hotshot are friends.

I thought the exact same thing.
Very easy comclusion for anyone to draw.
I question their collective motives.

I could be dead wrong about both...



Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #787 12/24/08 -
Post by: Keepthefaith on December 30, 2008, 11:20:59 PM



Quote
Remember Hotshot (Kathy Drenga) just recently told the monkeys that it was HER who directed Caps (and the witness) to Silvetti.
 
 Hotshot
Re: Natalee Case Discussion #781 12/3/08 -
« Reply #285 on: Today at 12:48:24 AM »

You all seem to jump to conclusions that everything was handed over to the incompetent ALE....... Did you ever stop to think that maybe there was a reason they took off so fast? Do you really think they are that stupid to not cover their butts? Hellooooo, Tim has been through it already, many times. Loose lips do sink ships. Maybe we are not supposed to be discussing those things here for everyone like Aruba to read.

OK, this is  really bad taste......And if you edit this prior to taking my last name out of every quote i  am going to be really pissed. ((edit)) can't get away with this, and then not assume I will not post her name.. Dave did not  know all of this was going on here, he is not a happy camper.  Will post more tomorrow, i need sleep.


I think our Mods are doing a good job and if they felt anyhting was not appropriate they'd remove it!You have to remember Hotshot.This is a forum.If you want to dispute what Kermit is saying.Do it!You have every opportunity with out being interrupted!

KEEPTHEFAITH


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #787 12/24/08 -
Post by: Hotshot on December 30, 2008, 11:24:04 PM
Kermit..

A lot of what you have posted is a bunch of cut and posted posts from Shango...It is totally incorrect and out of context.

And those that aren't familiar with Shango may buy it...

Shame on you!!!!!!!!!

Thank You for replying to my question from your last visit I see you were not in direct email contact with Caps...

God himself only knows what the heck you are trying to imply with Lalas and Lisa as I didn't bother to read it.







((edit - ok, you have proved you have emails from Capslock - it's not appropriate to post private emails though)))   
 
 
 

posting emails........not good


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #787 12/24/08 -
Post by: klaasend on December 30, 2008, 11:25:11 PM
Hotshot - your name has been posted, you have done interviews, your real life name is out there and Kermit's is not.   


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #787 12/24/08 -
Post by: Keepthefaith on December 30, 2008, 11:28:00 PM
Hotshot - your name has been posted, you have done interviews, your real life name is out there and Kermit's is not.   

Again.The Moderator's do a fine job i must say! ::MonkeyCool::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #787 12/24/08 -
Post by: KYcat on December 30, 2008, 11:31:00 PM
KeeptheFaith, my head is spinning too.  LOL

I thought maybe my post upset you in some way.  I agree with what you are saying.  Kermit has backed up everything she/he has posted.  I appreciate that.  I would also like to clarify, again, that my opinions are my own and that I derive them from the information on this blog and the news.  In order to change my opinion, information that I believe to be true has to be discounted with evidence not heresay. 

The monkeys are not bashing anyone.  We want the truth.  We want Natalee to be brought home where she belongs.  We want her family to have closure and peace. 

Asking hard questions is not bashing.  If I was Natalee's family, I would not give one damn if someone's feelings were hurt because I was searching for the truth of what happened to my daughter.  This family has suffered way more than hurt feelings. 

Monkeys have thick skin.  That is the only way the truth will be brought out.  I personally think that the past couple of days has brought out a lot of truth that many of us have speculated on and now have verification.

Remember what we are here for.  Natalee. 







Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #787 12/24/08 -
Post by: Hotshot on December 30, 2008, 11:33:31 PM
Klaas, I know you  and ((edit)) live close to each other, so you may talk,and thats fine.  but what is good for one is good  for the other. Think what you want.i am done with it. Fight amongst yourselves, post, post and repost the same  thing it will get you far. This is not the SM I know.  Caps wont be back, hes had enough too, just like Kyle. Caps is still working in the background, how can you even  question his witness?  They have been with the FBI and passed lie detector tests, its been on the news for god sake. I am done!


Really, you know we live close?  #1  I was not aware you knew where I lived  #2  I don't talk to anyone

Because I'm allowing questions you are accusing me of something?  Should we only allow ideas that you approve of at SM?  Should we stop questioning things/people with things don't quite seem right?



Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #787 12/24/08 -
Post by: Keepthefaith on December 30, 2008, 11:37:16 PM
KeeptheFaith, my head is spinning too.  LOL

I thought maybe my post upset you in some way.  I agree with what you are saying.  Kermit has backed up everything she/he has posted.  I appreciate that.  I would also like to clarify, again, that my opinions are my own and that I derive them from the information on this blog and the news.  In order to change my opinion, information that I believe to be true has to be discounted with evidence not heresay. 

The monkeys are not bashing anyone.  We want the truth.  We want Natalee to be brought home where she belongs.  We want her family to have closure and peace. 

Asking hard questions is not bashing.  If I was Natalee's family, I would not give one damn if someone's feelings were hurt because I was searching for the truth of what happened to my daughter.  This family has suffered way more than hurt feelings. 

Monkeys have thick skin.  That is the only way the truth will be brought out.  I personally think that the past couple of days has brought out a lot of truth that many of us have speculated on and now have verification.

Remember what we are here for.  Natalee. 







I agree 110% Kycat.Some Monkey's are posting that they don't believe,and or trust Kermit.Which is fine and OK.The only thing i ask is why?No one explains to me with facts as to why not to trust Kermit.That's all!I stand with the Frog..


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #787 12/24/08 -
Post by: Keepthefaith on December 30, 2008, 11:38:53 PM
Klaas, I know you  and ((edit))  live close to each other, so you may talk,and thats fine.  but what is good for one is good  for the other. Think what you want.i am done with it. Fight amongst yourselves, post, post and repost the same  thing it will get you far. This is not the SM I know.  Caps wont be back, hes had enough too, just like Kyle. Caps is still working in the background, how can you even  question his witness?  They have been with the FBI and passed lie detector tests, its been on the news for god sake. I am done!

Explain your side HotShot!


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #787 12/24/08 -
Post by: klaasend on December 30, 2008, 11:41:51 PM
Klaas, I know you  and ((edit)) live close to each other, so you may talk,and thats fine.  but what is good for one is good  for the other. Think what you want.i am done with it. Fight amongst yourselves, post, post and repost the same  thing it will get you far. This is not the SM I know.  Caps wont be back, hes had enough too, just like Kyle. Caps is still working in the background, how can you even  question his witness?  They have been with the FBI and passed lie detector tests, its been on the news for god sake. I am done!


Really, you know we live close?  #1  I was not aware you knew where I lived  #2  I don't talk to anyone

Because I'm allowing questions you are accusing me of something?  Should we only allow ideas that you approve of at SM?  Should we stop questioning things/people with things don't quite seem right?



Also - is this a threat?  You and Caps and Kyle are done with SM but will continue to work in the background?  Really?

Edited to add:  I didn't even know Kermits real name until you posted it.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #787 12/24/08 -
Post by: ldstlou on December 30, 2008, 11:43:33 PM
KeeptheFaith, my head is spinning too.  LOL

I thought maybe my post upset you in some way.  I agree with what you are saying.  Kermit has backed up everything she/he has posted.  I appreciate that.  I would also like to clarify, again, that my opinions are my own and that I derive them from the information on this blog and the news.  In order to change my opinion, information that I believe to be true has to be discounted with evidence not heresay. 

The monkeys are not bashing anyone.  We want the truth.  We want Natalee to be brought home where she belongs.  We want her family to have closure and peace. 

Asking hard questions is not bashing.  If I was Natalee's family, I would not give one damn if someone's feelings were hurt because I was searching for the truth of what happened to my daughter.  This family has suffered way more than hurt feelings. 

Monkeys have thick skin.  That is the only way the truth will be brought out.  I personally think that the past couple of days has brought out a lot of truth that many of us have speculated on and now have verification.

Remember what we are here for.  Natalee. 







I agree 110% Kycat.Some Monkey's are posting that they don't believe,and or trust Kermit.Which is fine and OK.The only thing i ask is why?No one explains to me with facts as to why not to trust Kermit.That's all!I stand with the Frog..

Really? She drags Lalas into her "conspiracy" now and you are going to stand by her? Really? Wow.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #787 12/24/08 -
Post by: BUCKSHOT on December 30, 2008, 11:43:46 PM
Klaas, I know you  and ((edit))  live close to each other, so you may talk,and thats fine.  but what is good for one is good  for the other. Think what you want.i am done with it. Fight amongst yourselves, post, post and repost the same  thing it will get you far. This is not the SM I know.  Caps wont be back, hes had enough too, just like Kyle. Caps is still working in the background, how can you even  question his witness?  They have been with the FBI and passed lie detector tests, its been on the news for god sake. I am done!

Explain your side HotShot!

SM has always been a place where facts/theories are either proven or disproven.
The truth is the truth. Fiction is fiction and belongs to Julia Renfro ( ::MonkeyHaHa::)and her disinformants team.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #787 12/24/08 -
Post by: snoopy on December 30, 2008, 11:44:34 PM
I'm still 7 pages behind.  Been reading for 2 hours, but I just wanted to say thank you to wingnut, jen and Kermit.  And thank you to the Freebirds in seeking justice for Natalee.  Ok back to page 31 


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #787 12/24/08 -
Post by: Keepthefaith on December 30, 2008, 11:45:14 PM
KeeptheFaith, my head is spinning too.  LOL

I thought maybe my post upset you in some way.  I agree with what you are saying.  Kermit has backed up everything she/he has posted.  I appreciate that.  I would also like to clarify, again, that my opinions are my own and that I derive them from the information on this blog and the news.  In order to change my opinion, information that I believe to be true has to be discounted with evidence not heresay. 

The monkeys are not bashing anyone.  We want the truth.  We want Natalee to be brought home where she belongs.  We want her family to have closure and peace. 

Asking hard questions is not bashing.  If I was Natalee's family, I would not give one damn if someone's feelings were hurt because I was searching for the truth of what happened to my daughter.  This family has suffered way more than hurt feelings. 

Monkeys have thick skin.  That is the only way the truth will be brought out.  I personally think that the past couple of days has brought out a lot of truth that many of us have speculated on and now have verification.

Remember what we are here for.  Natalee. 







I agree 110% Kycat.Some Monkey's are posting that they don't believe,and or trust Kermit.Which is fine and OK.The only thing i ask is why?No one explains to me with facts as to why not to trust Kermit.That's all!I stand with the Frog..

Really? She drags Lalas into her "conspiracy" now and you are going to stand by her? Really? Wow.

Explain to me why i shouldn't stand with the Frog ldstlou!First.Asnwer the question as to whether Kyle turned over all information to the Holloway family,and or the FBI in a timely manner?Yes or No.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #787 12/24/08 -
Post by: KYcat on December 30, 2008, 11:47:19 PM
Thanks San.  I thought our questions were good too!! Alas, we still have no answers to these questions.

Anyone?  I know no one (that might be a double negative) so I can't ask them personally.

 ::MonkeyWaa::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #787 12/24/08 -
Post by: San on December 30, 2008, 11:47:56 PM
KeeptheFaith, my head is spinning too.  LOL

I thought maybe my post upset you in some way.  I agree with what you are saying.  Kermit has backed up everything she/he has posted.  I appreciate that.  I would also like to clarify, again, that my opinions are my own and that I derive them from the information on this blog and the news.  In order to change my opinion, information that I believe to be true has to be discounted with evidence not heresay. 

The monkeys are not bashing anyone.  We want the truth.  We want Natalee to be brought home where she belongs.  We want her family to have closure and peace. 

Asking hard questions is not bashing.  If I was Natalee's family, I would not give one damn if someone's feelings were hurt because I was searching for the truth of what happened to my daughter.  This family has suffered way more than hurt feelings. 

Monkeys have thick skin.  That is the only way the truth will be brought out.  I personally think that the past couple of days has brought out a lot of truth that many of us have speculated on and now have verification.

Remember what we are here for.  Natalee. 



I agree 110% Kycat.Some Monkey's are posting that they don't believe,and or trust Kermit.Which is fine and OK.The only thing i ask is why?No one explains to me with facts as to why not to trust Kermit.That's all!I stand with the Frog..

Really? She drags Lalas into her "conspiracy" now and you are going to stand by her? Really? Wow.

Explain to me why i shouldn't stand with the Frog ldstlou!First.Asnwer the question as to whether Kyle turned over all information to the Holloway family,and or the FBI in a timely manner?Yes or No.

Pick one it should be easy.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #787 12/24/08 -
Post by: Artcolley on December 30, 2008, 11:48:00 PM
I definitely stand with the Frog


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #787 12/24/08 -
Post by: San on December 30, 2008, 11:48:22 PM
I'm still 7 pages behind.  Been reading for 2 hours, but I just wanted to say thank you to wingnut, jen and Kermit.  And thank you to the Freebirds in seeking justice for Natalee.  Ok back to page 31 

Well hurry up Snoopy  ::MonkeyHaHa::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #787 12/24/08 -
Post by: Keepthefaith on December 30, 2008, 11:48:25 PM
I'm waiting for answer's but think i'll be waiting for a long time!This is for either ldstlou or Hotshot.Please explain to everyone who is not in the know as to why we shouldn't belive Kermit???I'll wait your answer...TIA


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #787 12/24/08 -
Post by: San on December 30, 2008, 11:49:20 PM
I definitely stand with the Frog

Me too.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #787 12/24/08 -
Post by: klaasend on December 30, 2008, 11:49:28 PM
Klaas, I know you  and ((edit)) live close to each other, so you may talk,and thats fine.  but what is good for one is good  for the other. Think what you want.i am done with it. Fight amongst yourselves, post, post and repost the same  thing it will get you far. This is not the SM I know.  Caps wont be back, hes had enough too, just like Kyle. Caps is still working in the background, how can you even  question his witness?  They have been with the FBI and passed lie detector tests, its been on the news for god sake. I am done!


Really, you know we live close?  #1  I was not aware you knew where I lived  #2  I don't talk to anyone

Because I'm allowing questions you are accusing me of something?  Should we only allow ideas that you approve of at SM?  Should we stop questioning things/people with things don't quite seem right?



Also - is this a threat?  You and Caps and Kyle are done with SM but will continue to work in the background?  Really?

Edited to add:  I didn't even know Kermits real name until you posted it.

I just realized you sound almost exactly like *******.  So is this the ChatnGrumble team vs. the SM team  ::MonkeyHaHa::

This is about Natalee, it's not about your ego or Observers ego or Destinys ego or Caps.  Quit accusing people without any basis.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #787 12/24/08 -
Post by: San on December 30, 2008, 11:50:27 PM
I'm waiting for answer's but think i'll be waiting for a long time!This is for either ldstlou or Hotshot.Please explain to everyone who is not in the know as to why we shouldn't belive Kermit???I'll wait your answer...TIA

This is going to be a long night  ::MonkeyHaHa::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #787 12/24/08 -
Post by: 2NJSons_Mom on December 30, 2008, 11:51:28 PM
I think I posted something about underground a page or so ago.   ::MonkeyCool::



Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #787 12/24/08 -
Post by: Keepthefaith on December 30, 2008, 11:51:34 PM
As of now Hotshot and ldstlou are either lurking or gone.I will await your answer's regarding why any Monkey shouldn't Trust Kermit!!Please explain to me in detail why we as Monkey's shouldn't Trust Kermit?



Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #787 12/24/08 -
Post by: Magnolia on December 30, 2008, 11:51:45 PM
KeeptheFaith, my head is spinning too.  LOL

I thought maybe my post upset you in some way.  I agree with what you are saying.  Kermit has backed up everything she/he has posted.  I appreciate that.  I would also like to clarify, again, that my opinions are my own and that I derive them from the information on this blog and the news.  In order to change my opinion, information that I believe to be true has to be discounted with evidence not heresay. 

The monkeys are not bashing anyone.  We want the truth.  We want Natalee to be brought home where she belongs.  We want her family to have closure and peace. 

Asking hard questions is not bashing.  If I was Natalee's family, I would not give one damn if someone's feelings were hurt because I was searching for the truth of what happened to my daughter.  This family has suffered way more than hurt feelings. 

Monkeys have thick skin.  That is the only way the truth will be brought out.  I personally think that the past couple of days has brought out a lot of truth that many of us have speculated on and now have verification.

Remember what we are here for.  Natalee. 







I agree 110% Kycat.Some Monkey's are posting that they don't believe,and or trust Kermit.Which is fine and OK.The only thing i ask is why?No one explains to me with facts as to why not to trust Kermit.That's all!I stand with the Frog..

Really? She drags Lalas into her "conspiracy" now and you are going to stand by her? Really? Wow.

It was you, ldstlou, that drug Lalas into the conspiracy when you said
that you had Lalas send the pictures to Jug.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #787 12/24/08 -
Post by: KYcat on December 30, 2008, 11:53:18 PM
Well, since we are mixing it up  ::MonkeyHaHa::  I have to say this.

I appreciate any search efforts that were done to find Natalee.  On land, at sea.

BUT, why was evidence not secured?  I mean, come on.  No jurisdiction, no control, breaking Aruban laws?  Are you serious.  To he** with their so called laws.  If I had been on that boat I would have been like glue.  You could not have kept me away from evidence and it damn sure would have been documented and given to the CORRECT law enforcement and certainly to the FAMILY.


WOW, I feel better.

 


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #787 12/24/08 -
Post by: Keepthefaith on December 30, 2008, 11:53:24 PM
Sorry Klass if i got a little worked up.These Drive-by posts get to me sometimes..Again sorry.. ::MonkeyCool::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #787 12/24/08 -
Post by: Keepthefaith on December 30, 2008, 11:54:38 PM
Well, since we are mixing it up  ::MonkeyHaHa::  I have to say this.

I appreciate any search efforts that were done to find Natalee.  On land, at sea.

BUT, why was evidence not secured?  I mean, come on.  No jurisdiction, no control, breaking Aruban laws?  Are you serious.  To he** with their so called laws.  If I had been on that boat I would have been like glue.  You could not have kept me away from evidence and it damn sure would have been documented and given to the CORRECT law enforcement and certainly to the FAMILY.


WOW, I feel better.

 

I agree KYcat.Why would you not have dove on that cage without ALE??


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #787 12/24/08 -
Post by: MuffyBee on December 30, 2008, 11:55:16 PM
(http://bestsmileys.com/violent/18.gif)


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #787 12/24/08 -
Post by: Keepthefaith on December 30, 2008, 11:56:10 PM
(http://bestsmileys.com/violent/18.gif)

 ::MonkeyLaugh:: ::MonkeyLaugh:: That made me laugh till i almost cried...Thank you Muffy..


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #787 12/24/08 -
Post by: 2NJSons_Mom on December 30, 2008, 11:56:43 PM
Sorry Klass if i got a little worked up.These Drive-by posts get to me sometimes..Again sorry.. ::MonkeyCool::

Klaas has Klass, Keepthefaith.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #787 12/24/08 -
Post by: Keepthefaith on December 30, 2008, 11:58:05 PM
Sorry Klass if i got a little worked up.These Drive-by posts get to me sometimes..Again sorry.. ::MonkeyCool::

Klaas has Klass, Keepthefaith.

I must always put 2 S's.Two a's from now on!! ::MonkeyDance::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #787 12/24/08 -
Post by: San on December 30, 2008, 11:58:20 PM
Sorry Klass if i got a little worked up.These Drive-by posts get to me sometimes..Again sorry.. ::MonkeyCool::

It was a drive by that started all of this last night.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #787 12/24/08 -
Post by: KYcat on December 30, 2008, 11:58:49 PM
(http://bestsmileys.com/violent/18.gif)

 ::MonkeyLaugh:: ::MonkeyLaugh:: That made me laugh till i almost cried...Thank you Muffy..

 ::MonkeyLaugh::  Like I said, mixing it up!!!!!  Oh, I'm on top, in case you wondered.



Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #787 12/24/08 -
Post by: San on December 31, 2008, 12:00:15 AM
(http://bestsmileys.com/violent/18.gif)

I'm the one in the red.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #787 12/24/08 -
Post by: Artcolley on December 31, 2008, 12:00:51 AM
 Maybe they draw straws to see whose turn it is to drive by? ::MonkeyHaHa::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #787 12/24/08 -
Post by: MuffyBee on December 31, 2008, 12:00:58 AM
What is with the drive-by postings?  Dropping in, stir it up, swan off...  I know if peeps can post they can read.  Therefore they can read the questions, but somehow can't answer them?  I would like some darned answers.   I feel like Wreck, but he says it better.   It's been hard enough with Aruba and all of that treachery, let alone what I've been seeing here lately.    Why not answer the questions?  Posters just coming and posting one post and going off.  It really makes for good discussion.  NOT  jmho





Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #787 12/24/08 -
Post by: Tibrogargan on December 31, 2008, 12:01:05 AM
I'm waiting for answer's but think i'll be waiting for a long time!This is for either ldstlou or Hotshot.Please explain to everyone who is not in the know as to why we shouldn't belive Kermit???I'll wait your answer...TIA

This is going to be a long night  ::MonkeyHaHa::


New Years Eve already in my corner of the world and I see the fireworks have started early this year. 


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #787 12/24/08 -
Post by: KYcat on December 31, 2008, 12:01:18 AM
(http://bestsmileys.com/violent/18.gif)

I'm the one in the red.

LOL, I already took him!


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #787 12/24/08 -
Post by: billb's daughter on December 31, 2008, 12:01:23 AM
I'm waiting for answer's but think i'll be waiting for a long time!This is for either ldstlou or Hotshot.Please explain to everyone who is not in the know as to why we shouldn't belive Kermit???I'll wait your answer...TIA
MumInOhio seems to have issues with Kermit also. I'd be interested in her take on why we should not believe Kermit...
I stand with the frog...
ps..i thought there was room for CAPS version being the "what happened to Natalee" and Kermit's version "on where Natalee ended up".
With all the Kermit bashing from a few, who incidentally offer not any backup, and the silence from Kyle and CAPS, "I'm inclined to believe" those attacking Kermit have a different agenda wrt Justice for Natalee....
IT IS ALL ABOUT GETTING NATALEE HOME after 3 + years! Justice will come, in this life or the next for the preps.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #787 12/24/08 -
Post by: San on December 31, 2008, 12:01:52 AM
Maybe they draw straws to see whose turn it is to drive by? ::MonkeyHaHa::

 ::MonkeyHaHa:: ::MonkeyHaHa::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #787 12/24/08 -
Post by: MuffyBee on December 31, 2008, 12:02:11 AM
Sorry Klass if i got a little worked up.These Drive-by posts get to me sometimes..Again sorry.. ::MonkeyCool::

Klaas has Klass, Keepthefaith.

I must always put 2 S's.Two a's from now on!! ::MonkeyDance::

Here ya go  (http://bestsmileys.com/oneofakind/2.gif)


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #787 12/24/08 -
Post by: KYcat on December 31, 2008, 12:02:38 AM
Sorry Klass if i got a little worked up.These Drive-by posts get to me sometimes..Again sorry.. ::MonkeyCool::

It was a drive by that started all of this last night.

They should have kept on driving.   ::MonkeyWink::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #787 12/24/08 -
Post by: klaasend on December 31, 2008, 12:03:08 AM
To clarify

1.  Hotshot's real life name has been out there since almost the beginning of the case, mostly because she chose to do interviews and "put herself" out there.  Hotshots real life name is common knowledge to everyone that has followed this case.

2.  Kermit's name is not common knowledge, in fact, until Hotshot posted it I didn't know what it was.  That is why it's not ok to post Kermit's real life name.

3.  I have no idea where Kermit lives and do not correspond with Kermit outside this forum with the exception of one or two recent emails pertaining to the Kyle issue.  Never before. 

4.  I don't appreciate people spreading false rumors about me or others at SM. 

5.  SM is a discussion forum.  We are not beholden to anyone and take orders from no one.  The idea is to discuss different pieces of evidence and do our best to facilitate justice in missing persons cases.

6.  I don't agree with everything posted at SM and I don't expect people to always agree with me.  Just because it's posted does not mean everyone at SM feels the same. 


I could go on and on but why bother.  Nobody listens anyway, their egos get in the way.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #787 12/24/08 -
Post by: San on December 31, 2008, 12:03:39 AM
I'm waiting for answer's but think i'll be waiting for a long time!This is for either ldstlou or Hotshot.Please explain to everyone who is not in the know as to why we shouldn't belive Kermit???I'll wait your answer...TIA

This is going to be a long night  ::MonkeyHaHa::


New Years Eve already in my corner of the world and I see the fireworks have started early this year. 

Happy New Year.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #787 12/24/08 -
Post by: KYcat on December 31, 2008, 12:03:58 AM
I'm waiting for answer's but think i'll be waiting for a long time!This is for either ldstlou or Hotshot.Please explain to everyone who is not in the know as to why we shouldn't belive Kermit???I'll wait your answer...TIA

This is going to be a long night  ::MonkeyHaHa::


New Years Eve already in my corner of the world and I see the fireworks have started early this year. 

I LOVE fireworks!


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #787 12/24/08 -
Post by: Magnolia on December 31, 2008, 12:05:00 AM
(http://bestsmileys.com/violent/18.gif)

I'm the one in the red.

The Yellow one is the coward.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #787 12/24/08 -
Post by: Keepthefaith on December 31, 2008, 12:05:12 AM
What is with the drive-by postings?  Dropping in, stir it up, swan off...  I know if peeps can post they can read.  Therefore they can read the questions, but somehow can't answer them?  I would like some darned answers.   I feel like Wreck, but he says it better.   It's been hard enough with Aruba and all of that treachery, let alone what I've been seeing here lately.    Why not answer the questions?  Posters just coming and posting one post and going off.  It really makes for good discussion.  NOT  jmho





I'm inquisitive Monkey.I think Scared Monkey's is absolutely a wonderful forum.I started with Natalee and have really taken to Caylee as well.The more Monkey's the better. ::MonkeyDance:: What could be better than Disneyland??Monkeyland.. ::MonkeyDance::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #787 12/24/08 -
Post by: Artcolley on December 31, 2008, 12:05:50 AM
 ::cartwheel::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #787 12/24/08 -
Post by: snoopy on December 31, 2008, 12:06:08 AM
I'm still 7 pages behind.  Been reading for 2 hours, but I just wanted to say thank you to wingnut, jen and Kermit.  And thank you to the Freebirds in seeking justice for Natalee.  Ok back to page 31 

Well hurry up Snoopy  ::MonkeyHaHa::

WOW!  lol  Finally caught up.  That was exhausting.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #787 12/24/08 -
Post by: KYcat on December 31, 2008, 12:06:43 AM
To clarify

1.  Hotshot's real life name has been out there since almost the beginning of the case, mostly because she chose to do interviews and "put herself" out there.  Hotshots real life name is common knowledge to everyone that has followed this case.

2.  Kermit's name is not common knowledge, in fact, until Hotshot posted it I didn't know what it was.  That is why it's not ok to post Kermit's real life name.

3.  I have no idea where Kermit lives and do not correspond with Kermit outside this forum with the exception of one or two recent emails pertaining to the Kyle issue.  Never before. 

4.  I don't appreciate people spreading false rumors about me or others at SM. 

5.  SM is a discussion forum.  We are not beholden to anyone and take orders from no one.  The idea is to discuss different pieces of evidence and do our best to facilitate justice in missing persons cases.

6.  I don't agree with everything posted at SM and I don't expect people to always agree with me.  Just because it's posted does not mean everyone at SM feels the same. 


I could go on and on but why bother.  Nobody listens anyway, their egos get in the way.


I'm listening.   :smt040  and I agree.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #787 12/24/08 -
Post by: MuffyBee on December 31, 2008, 12:06:50 AM
I love this place.  Just wish we could get some answers...


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #787 12/24/08 -
Post by: 2NJSons_Mom on December 31, 2008, 12:07:30 AM
Maybe they draw straws to see whose turn it is to drive by? ::MonkeyHaHa::

 ::MonkeyHaHa:: ::MonkeyHaHa::

 ::MonkeyHaHa::   

Yes, but some drive in quote stacks.   ::MonkeyRoll::



Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #787 12/24/08 -
Post by: Tibrogargan on December 31, 2008, 12:07:50 AM
I'm waiting for answer's but think i'll be waiting for a long time!This is for either ldstlou or Hotshot.Please explain to everyone who is not in the know as to why we shouldn't belive Kermit???I'll wait your answer...TIA

This is going to be a long night  ::MonkeyHaHa::


New Years Eve already in my corner of the world and I see the fireworks have started early this year. 

Happy New Year.

Happy New Year to you too San and all the monkeys.

I have to say that I have kissed a few frogs in my life - but I do stand by our Frog Kermit.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #787 12/24/08 -
Post by: Artcolley on December 31, 2008, 12:07:54 AM
To clarify

1.  Hotshot's real life name has been out there since almost the beginning of the case, mostly because she chose to do interviews and "put herself" out there.  Hotshots real life name is common knowledge to everyone that has followed this case.

2.  Kermit's name is not common knowledge, in fact, until Hotshot posted it I didn't know what it was.  That is why it's not ok to post Kermit's real life name.

3.  I have no idea where Kermit lives and do not correspond with Kermit outside this forum with the exception of one or two recent emails pertaining to the Kyle issue.  Never before. 

4.  I don't appreciate people spreading false rumors about me or others at SM. 

5.  SM is a discussion forum.  We are not beholden to anyone and take orders from no one.  The idea is to discuss different pieces of evidence and do our best to facilitate justice in missing persons cases.

6.  I don't agree with everything posted at SM and I don't expect people to always agree with me.  Just because it's posted does not mean everyone at SM feels the same. 


I could go on and on but why bother.  Nobody listens anyway, their egos get in the way.



Thank you for posting this. I understand perfectly.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #787 12/24/08 -
Post by: Artcolley on December 31, 2008, 12:09:01 AM
Maybe they draw straws to see whose turn it is to drive by? ::MonkeyHaHa::

 ::MonkeyHaHa:: ::MonkeyHaHa::

 ::MonkeyHaHa::   

Yes, but some drive in quote stacks.   ::MonkeyRoll::





 ::MonkeyLaugh::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #787 12/24/08 -
Post by: MuffyBee on December 31, 2008, 12:09:46 AM
Maybe they draw straws to see whose turn it is to drive by? ::MonkeyHaHa::

 ::MonkeyHaHa:: ::MonkeyHaHa::

 ::MonkeyHaHa::   

Yes, but some drive in quote stacks.   ::MonkeyRoll::





 ::MonkeyLaugh::

It's more like tag team wrestling, come to think of it...


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #787 12/24/08 -
Post by: Keepthefaith on December 31, 2008, 12:09:54 AM
Hope i don't miss anybody havin fun on the rides at Monkeyland! ::MonkeyDance:: Headin to the store to get some butter for my turkey-melt and tater-tots,Yummmmmy...I will return shortly... ::cartwheel::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #787 12/24/08 -
Post by: billb's daughter on December 31, 2008, 12:09:56 AM
I'm waiting for answer's but think i'll be waiting for a long time!This is for either ldstlou or Hotshot.Please explain to everyone who is not in the know as to why we shouldn't belive Kermit???I'll wait your answer...TIA
MumInOhio seems to have issues with Kermit also. I'd be interested in her take on why we should not believe Kermit...
I stand with the frog...
ps..i thought there was room for CAPS version being the "what happened to Natalee" and Kermit's version "on where Natalee ended up".
With all the Kermit bashing from a few, who incidentally offer not any backup, and the silence from Kyle and CAPS, "I'm inclined to believe" those attacking Kermit have a different agenda wrt Justice for Natalee....
IT IS ALL ABOUT GETTING NATALEE HOME after 3 + years! Justice will come, in this life or the next for the preps.
OK...I get it that everyone is caught up in the moment....but I'd really appreciate it if at least ONE person acknowledged my posts...Please don't make me go back to Clint Eastwood and Paint your Wagon...I talk to the trees.... ::MonkeyCool::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #787 12/24/08 -
Post by: San on December 31, 2008, 12:10:05 AM
(http://bestsmileys.com/violent/18.gif)

I'm the one in the red.

The Yellow one is the coward.

I will not anwser  ::MonkeyHaHa::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #787 12/24/08 -
Post by: KYcat on December 31, 2008, 12:10:14 AM
Miss Magnolia, I love your posts.  You are a pip!!! 

That's a good thang.



Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #787 12/24/08 -
Post by: klaasend on December 31, 2008, 12:10:59 AM
Hope i don't miss anybody havin fun on the rides at Monkeyland! ::MonkeyDance:: Headin to the store to get some butter for my turkey-melt and tater-tots,Yummmmmy...I will return shortly... ::cartwheel::

Turkey melt and tator tots at this time of night?  ::MonkeyShocked::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #787 12/24/08 -
Post by: texasmom on December 31, 2008, 12:13:26 AM
I'm waiting for answer's but think i'll be waiting for a long time!This is for either ldstlou or Hotshot.Please explain to everyone who is not in the know as to why we shouldn't belive Kermit???I'll wait your answer...TIA
MumInOhio seems to have issues with Kermit also. I'd be interested in her take on why we should not believe Kermit...
I stand with the frog...
ps..i thought there was room for CAPS version being the "what happened to Natalee" and Kermit's version "on where Natalee ended up".
With all the Kermit bashing from a few, who incidentally offer not any backup, and the silence from Kyle and CAPS, "I'm inclined to believe" those attacking Kermit have a different agenda wrt Justice for Natalee....
IT IS ALL ABOUT GETTING NATALEE HOME after 3 + years! Justice will come, in this life or the next for the preps.
OK...I get it that everyone is caught up in the moment....but I'd really appreciate it if at least ONE person acknowledged my posts...Please don't make me go back to Clint Eastwood and Paint your Wagon...I talk to the trees.... ::MonkeyCool::

Hi billb, I've been wondering where in the heck you were!!!!   ::MonkeyCool::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #787 12/24/08 -
Post by: San on December 31, 2008, 12:14:05 AM
I'm waiting for answer's but think i'll be waiting for a long time!This is for either ldstlou or Hotshot.Please explain to everyone who is not in the know as to why we shouldn't belive Kermit???I'll wait your answer...TIA
MumInOhio seems to have issues with Kermit also. I'd be interested in her take on why we should not believe Kermit...
I stand with the frog...
ps..i thought there was room for CAPS version being the "what happened to Natalee" and Kermit's version "on where Natalee ended up".
With all the Kermit bashing from a few, who incidentally offer not any backup, and the silence from Kyle and CAPS, "I'm inclined to believe" those attacking Kermit have a different agenda wrt Justice for Natalee....
IT IS ALL ABOUT GETTING NATALEE HOME after 3 + years! Justice will come, in this life or the next for the preps.
OK...I get it that everyone is caught up in the moment....but I'd really appreciate it if at least ONE person acknowledged my posts...Please don't make me go back to Clint Eastwood and Paint your Wagon...I talk to the trees.... ::MonkeyCool::

OK I will answer your post.  I agree.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #787 12/24/08 -
Post by: MuffyBee on December 31, 2008, 12:14:14 AM
I'm waiting for answer's but think i'll be waiting for a long time!This is for either ldstlou or Hotshot.Please explain to everyone who is not in the know as to why we shouldn't belive Kermit???I'll wait your answer...TIA
MumInOhio seems to have issues with Kermit also. I'd be interested in her take on why we should not believe Kermit...
I stand with the frog...
ps..i thought there was room for CAPS version being the "what happened to Natalee" and Kermit's version "on where Natalee ended up".
With all the Kermit bashing from a few, who incidentally offer not any backup, and the silence from Kyle and CAPS, "I'm inclined to believe" those attacking Kermit have a different agenda wrt Justice for Natalee....
IT IS ALL ABOUT GETTING NATALEE HOME after 3 + years! Justice will come, in this life or the next for the preps.
OK...I get it that everyone is caught up in the moment....but I'd really appreciate it if at least ONE person acknowledged my posts...Please don't make me go back to Clint Eastwood and Paint your Wagon...I talk to the trees.... ::MonkeyCool::

Good post.  I too am interested in hearing from MumInOhio why we shouldn't believe Kermit.  That is why I was fussin' about those that make one post and then nothing.  And yes, it IS ALL about getting Natalee home.  (hopefully in my lifetime) 


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #787 12/24/08 -
Post by: 2NJSons_Mom on December 31, 2008, 12:14:38 AM
I'm waiting for answer's but think i'll be waiting for a long time!This is for either ldstlou or Hotshot.Please explain to everyone who is not in the know as to why we shouldn't belive Kermit???I'll wait your answer...TIA
MumInOhio seems to have issues with Kermit also. I'd be interested in her take on why we should not believe Kermit...
I stand with the frog...
ps..i thought there was room for CAPS version being the "what happened to Natalee" and Kermit's version "on where Natalee ended up".
With all the Kermit bashing from a few, who incidentally offer not any backup, and the silence from Kyle and CAPS, "I'm inclined to believe" those attacking Kermit have a different agenda wrt Justice for Natalee....
IT IS ALL ABOUT GETTING NATALEE HOME after 3 + years! Justice will come, in this life or the next for the preps.
OK...I get it that everyone is caught up in the moment....but I'd really appreciate it if at least ONE person acknowledged my posts...Please don't make me go back to Clint Eastwood and Paint your Wagon...I talk to the trees.... ::MonkeyCool::

Hey, I posted a page or so ago wondering how Mum knew who Kermit was referring to and no one replied....I'm still here.  We see you billb.... ::MonkeyWink::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #787 12/24/08 -
Post by: snoopy on December 31, 2008, 12:15:43 AM
billb  I read everything.  It's been a wild day.  I'm just now caught up. 

Keep your eye on the goal monkeys.  Don't let monkeys who are being mislead confuse you.  It happened to me for a short time and will never happen again.

Justice for Natalee

Bring Natalee home


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #787 12/24/08 -
Post by: Artcolley on December 31, 2008, 12:15:59 AM
I'm waiting for answer's but think i'll be waiting for a long time!This is for either ldstlou or Hotshot.Please explain to everyone who is not in the know as to why we shouldn't belive Kermit???I'll wait your answer...TIA
MumInOhio seems to have issues with Kermit also. I'd be interested in her take on why we should not believe Kermit...
I stand with the frog...
ps..i thought there was room for CAPS version being the "what happened to Natalee" and Kermit's version "on where Natalee ended up".
With all the Kermit bashing from a few, who incidentally offer not any backup, and the silence from Kyle and CAPS, "I'm inclined to believe" those attacking Kermit have a different agenda wrt Justice for Natalee....
IT IS ALL ABOUT GETTING NATALEE HOME after 3 + years! Justice will come, in this life or the next for the preps.
OK...I get it that everyone is caught up in the moment....but I'd really appreciate it if at least ONE person acknowledged my posts...Please don't make me go back to Clint Eastwood and Paint your Wagon...I talk to the trees.... ::MonkeyCool::

Hi BillB
I agree with you, I would like to hear some answers on why not to trust Kermit.

It does seem to me that those attacking Kermit do have another agenda and that is very troubling.
I would much prefer that everyone work together on this, but that darned "agenda" seems to be getting in the way for some.
BTW, I stand with the Frog ::MonkeyWink::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #787 12/24/08 -
Post by: KYcat on December 31, 2008, 12:16:28 AM
I'm waiting for answer's but think i'll be waiting for a long time!This is for either ldstlou or Hotshot.Please explain to everyone who is not in the know as to why we shouldn't belive Kermit???I'll wait your answer...TIA
MumInOhio seems to have issues with Kermit also. I'd be interested in her take on why we should not believe Kermit...
I stand with the frog...
ps..i thought there was room for CAPS version being the "what happened to Natalee" and Kermit's version "on where Natalee ended up".
With all the Kermit bashing from a few, who incidentally offer not any backup, and the silence from Kyle and CAPS, "I'm inclined to believe" those attacking Kermit have a different agenda wrt Justice for Natalee....
IT IS ALL ABOUT GETTING NATALEE HOME after 3 + years! Justice will come, in this life or the next for the preps.
OK...I get it that everyone is caught up in the moment....but I'd really appreciate it if at least ONE person acknowledged my posts...Please don't make me go back to Clint Eastwood and Paint your Wagon...I talk to the trees.... ::MonkeyCool::

What's wrong with talking to trees?  If they answer, that would be a problem.  LOL

I saw your post billb and it is a good one.  I can't answer your questions directed to ldstlou, Hotshot or Mum but I wants answers also.  Maybe they will come back and explain.

And it is definitely about bringing Natalee home. 

 ::MonkeyWink::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #787 12/24/08 -
Post by: finngirl on December 31, 2008, 12:17:25 AM

Quote from: ss
on April 28, 2008, 08:15:49 PM

CAPS said that the initials SGCJ with the arrest are not for Steve Gregory Croes. He said the initials are written last name first so it would be S,GCJ. He said the name is Giovanni Solognier and I have been searching everywhere for a Giovanni Solognier.

Quote from: finngirl
on April 29, 2008, 01:08:32 AM

say what?

since when?

_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _

Authorities probing the disappearance of missing Alabama teenager Natalee Holloway arrested the DJ of a popular party boat Friday morning and searched his home.

A prosecutor's spokeswoman, Mariaine Croes, in keeping with Aruban law, identified him only by his initials, S.G.C. She said he was born July 21, 1978.
http://www.cnn.com/2005/LAW/06/17/missing.teen/index.html

note: SGC not CSG or C,SG
_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _

Mariaine Croes, a spokeswoman for the public prosecutor’s office, said Aruban authorities were not prepared to disclose why the person was arrested or how they are allegedly connected to the disappearance of the American teenager on the Dutch Caribbean island nearly a year ago.

Croes would only say that the person who was arrested is 19 and has the initials “G.V.C.” Authorities in Aruba typically only release a suspect’s initials upon their arrest.
http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,191903,00.html

note: GVC not VCG or VC,G
_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _

ORANJESTAD, Aruba -- Satish and Deepak Kalpoe, the two Surinamese brothers previously detained in the Natalee Holloway case, have been re-arrested on suspicion of premeditated rape and murder, Aruban government officials said Friday. A third person was also detained.

Prosecutor's office spokeswoman Mariaine Croes told FOX News that the third person was a man known as "Freddy" or "F.A.", said to be a friend of Joran van der Sloot, who has been held in the case since June 9.
(no link/sorry)

note: FA not AF or A,F
_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _

finn's free/possibly worthless advice to the codetalkers:
DO NOT DRINK THE KOOLAID



Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #787 12/24/08 -
Post by: San on December 31, 2008, 12:18:57 AM
billb  I read everything.  It's been a wild day.  I'm just now caught up. 

Keep your eye on the goal monkeys.  Don't let monkeys who are being mislead confuse you.  It happened to me for a short time and will never happen again.

Justice for Natalee

Bring Natalee home

Thanks Snoopy.  I am not confused.  Maybe tired but not confused...LOL


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #787 12/24/08 -
Post by: MuffyBee on December 31, 2008, 12:19:31 AM
Here is 2nj's post:

I knew what you meant, KeeptheFaith, without the correction.   

How did Mum know who Kermit was referring to????  I didn't have that equation right.  Must be an underground thing I'm not privy to.


I saw your post 2nj, and kind of nodded, wondering the same thing.  As far as underground and other such PRIVATE things, I'm not privy to any of that stuff either.  Oh well....


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #787 12/24/08 -
Post by: billb's daughter on December 31, 2008, 12:19:50 AM
I'm waiting for answer's but think i'll be waiting for a long time!This is for either ldstlou or Hotshot.Please explain to everyone who is not in the know as to why we shouldn't belive Kermit???I'll wait your answer...TIA
MumInOhio seems to have issues with Kermit also. I'd be interested in her take on why we should not believe Kermit...
I stand with the frog...
ps..i thought there was room for CAPS version being the "what happened to Natalee" and Kermit's version "on where Natalee ended up".
With all the Kermit bashing from a few, who incidentally offer not any backup, and the silence from Kyle and CAPS, "I'm inclined to believe" those attacking Kermit have a different agenda wrt Justice for Natalee....
IT IS ALL ABOUT GETTING NATALEE HOME after 3 + years! Justice will come, in this life or the next for the preps.
OK...I get it that everyone is caught up in the moment....but I'd really appreciate it if at least ONE person acknowledged my posts...Please don't make me go back to Clint Eastwood and Paint your Wagon...I talk to the trees.... ::MonkeyCool::

Hi billb, I've been wondering where in the heck you were!!!!   ::MonkeyCool::
Thanks TM....
I exist...I'm alive!
So much going on here....I hope answers come sooner than later for Beth, Dave, Jug and MONKEYS!


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #787 12/24/08 -
Post by: snoopy on December 31, 2008, 12:20:43 AM
I'm looking forward to what Kermit has to share tomm.  Should be interesting.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #787 12/24/08 -
Post by: BUCKSHOT on December 31, 2008, 12:22:09 AM

Quote from: ss
on April 28, 2008, 08:15:49 PM

CAPS said that the initials SGCJ with the arrest are not for Steve Gregory Croes. He said the initials are written last name first so it would be S,GCJ. He said the name is Giovanni Solognier and I have been searching everywhere for a Giovanni Solognier.

Quote from: finngirl
on April 29, 2008, 01:08:32 AM

say what?

since when?

_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _

Authorities probing the disappearance of missing Alabama teenager Natalee Holloway arrested the DJ of a popular party boat Friday morning and searched his home.

A prosecutor's spokeswoman, Mariaine Croes, in keeping with Aruban law, identified him only by his initials, S.G.C. She said he was born July 21, 1978.
http://www.cnn.com/2005/LAW/06/17/missing.teen/index.html

note: SGC not CSG or C,SG
_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _

Mariaine Croes, a spokeswoman for the public prosecutor’s office, said Aruban authorities were not prepared to disclose why the person was arrested or how they are allegedly connected to the disappearance of the American teenager on the Dutch Caribbean island nearly a year ago.

Croes would only say that the person who was arrested is 19 and has the initials “G.V.C.” Authorities in Aruba typically only release a suspect’s initials upon their arrest.
http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,191903,00.html

note: GVC not VCG or VC,G
_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _

ORANJESTAD, Aruba -- Satish and Deepak Kalpoe, the two Surinamese brothers previously detained in the Natalee Holloway case, have been re-arrested on suspicion of premeditated rape and murder, Aruban government officials said Friday. A third person was also detained.

Prosecutor's office spokeswoman Mariaine Croes told FOX News that the third person was a man known as "Freddy" or "F.A.", said to be a friend of Joran van der Sloot, who has been held in the case since June 9.
(no link/sorry)

note: FA not AF or A,F
_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _

finn's free/possibly worthless advice to the codetalkers:
DO NOT DRINK THE KOOLAID



finngirl -

Nice post.

Where is Arlene Schippers or Tickle-me-Tito when you need them to explain Aruban law.
 ::MonkeyHaHa:: ::MonkeyLaugh:: ::MonkeyConfused::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #787 12/24/08 -
Post by: KYcat on December 31, 2008, 12:23:23 AM
I do not want to go.  The cage is hopping tonight.  BUt I have to actually work on taxes.  I so hate it. 

Will be back tomorrow.  Everyone sleep well and pray for Justice for Natalee.



Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #787 12/24/08 -
Post by: Helen Back on December 31, 2008, 12:23:25 AM
I'm waiting for answer's but think i'll be waiting for a long time!This is for either ldstlou or Hotshot.Please explain to everyone who is not in the know as to why we shouldn't belive Kermit???I'll wait your answer...TIA
MumInOhio seems to have issues with Kermit also. I'd be interested in her take on why we should not believe Kermit...
I stand with the frog...
ps..i thought there was room for CAPS version being the "what happened to Natalee" and Kermit's version "on where Natalee ended up".
With all the Kermit bashing from a few, who incidentally offer not any backup, and the silence from Kyle and CAPS, "I'm inclined to believe" those attacking Kermit have a different agenda wrt Justice for Natalee....
IT IS ALL ABOUT GETTING NATALEE HOME after 3 + years! Justice will come, in this life or the next for the preps.
OK...I get it that everyone is caught up in the moment....but I'd really appreciate it if at least ONE person acknowledged my posts...Please don't make me go back to Clint Eastwood and Paint your Wagon...I talk to the trees.... ::MonkeyCool::

Hey, I posted a page or so ago wondering how Mum knew who Kermit was referring to and no one replied....I'm still here.  We see you billb.... ::MonkeyWink::

I never know who anyone is talking about until someone blabs it.   ::MonkeyHaHa::



Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #787 12/24/08 -
Post by: wreck on December 31, 2008, 12:23:28 AM
My opinion --- several monkeys here have been conned. Most of them were "shango" enthusiasts.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #787 12/24/08 -
Post by: KYcat on December 31, 2008, 12:25:00 AM
OKAY, I AM NOT LEAVING UNTIL SOMEONE SAYS GOODNIGHT TO ME.

NO ONE EVER SAYS GOODNIGHT TO ME.

TIA

 ::MonkeyHaHa::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #787 12/24/08 -
Post by: 2NJSons_Mom on December 31, 2008, 12:25:40 AM
Here is 2nj's post:

I knew what you meant, KeeptheFaith, without the correction.   

How did Mum know who Kermit was referring to????  I didn't have that equation right.  Must be an underground thing I'm not privy to.


I saw your post 2nj, and kind of nodded, wondering the same thing.  As far as underground and other such PRIVATE things, I'm not privy to any of that stuff either.  Oh well....

Yup...who's the mole?    ::MonkeyWink::

I stand with the Frog.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #787 12/24/08 -
Post by: wreck on December 31, 2008, 12:26:56 AM
I'm looking forward to what Kermit has to share tomm.  Should be interesting.
I'm just catching up again, but I think Kermit has already told us. Seems Caps/Silvetti were plotting to take some of the "cage" evidence and plant it in the pond. That way the cage contents could go on being undetected.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #787 12/24/08 -
Post by: MuffyBee on December 31, 2008, 12:27:12 AM
OKAY, I AM NOT LEAVING UNTIL SOMEONE SAYS GOODNIGHT TO ME.

NO ONE EVER SAYS GOODNIGHT TO ME.

TIA

 ::MonkeyHaHa::

I was gettin' to it, KYcat.  Good night (http://bestsmileys.com/sleeping/2.gif)



Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #787 12/24/08 -
Post by: texasmom on December 31, 2008, 12:27:22 AM
I do not want to go.  The cage is hopping tonight.  BUt I have to actually work on taxes.  I so hate it. 

Will be back tomorrow.  Everyone sleep well and pray for Justice for Natalee.




I feel for you KYcat, taxes YUCK...

We'll see you tomorrow, sleep well!  Justice for Natalee is always in my prayers!
::MonkeyCool::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #787 12/24/08 -
Post by: MuffyBee on December 31, 2008, 12:28:18 AM
I'm looking forward to what Kermit has to share tomm.  Should be interesting.
I'm just catching up again, but I think Kermit has already told us. Seems Caps/Silvetti were plotting to take some of the "cage" evidence and plant it in the pond. That way the cage contents could go on being undetected.

That's the way i understood it.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #787 12/24/08 -
Post by: 2NJSons_Mom on December 31, 2008, 12:28:19 AM
OKAY, I AM NOT LEAVING UNTIL SOMEONE SAYS GOODNIGHT TO ME.

NO ONE EVER SAYS GOODNIGHT TO ME.

TIA

 ::MonkeyHaHa::

G'nite, KYcat....see you when your taxes are done... ::MonkeyHaHa::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #787 12/24/08 -
Post by: KYcat on December 31, 2008, 12:28:40 AM
Oh, thank you so much.

GOODNIGHT ALL!


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #787 12/24/08 -
Post by: finngirl on December 31, 2008, 12:29:19 AM
finngirl -

Nice post.

Where is Arlene Schippers or Tickle-me-Tito when you need them to explain Aruban law.
 ::MonkeyHaHa:: ::MonkeyLaugh:: ::MonkeyConfused::

T/Y  :cool:

been soooo frustrated for a year re Caps
(ye gods, has it been that long?)

many/many things went against the grain
but to say so aloud caused problems ...
so it became easier to say nothing

and if I never see/hear Arlene again, it'll be too soon!
(or however that saying goes)



Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #787 12/24/08 -
Post by: texasmom on December 31, 2008, 12:29:33 AM
OKAY, I AM NOT LEAVING UNTIL SOMEONE SAYS GOODNIGHT TO ME.

NO ONE EVER SAYS GOODNIGHT TO ME.

TIA

 ::MonkeyHaHa::

 ::MonkeyShocked:: ::MonkeyWaa::

I do say goodnight to you KYcat!!!!!  I just can't post it fast enough I guess.

Goodnight again KYcat!!!!!

 ::MonkeyHaHa::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #787 12/24/08 -
Post by: klaasend on December 31, 2008, 12:29:55 AM
OKAY, I AM NOT LEAVING UNTIL SOMEONE SAYS GOODNIGHT TO ME.

NO ONE EVER SAYS GOODNIGHT TO ME.

TIA

 ::MonkeyHaHa::

Nite KYcat  ::MonkeyHaHa::

I'm off to take a quick bath..be back in a bit


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #787 12/24/08 -
Post by: billb's daughter on December 31, 2008, 12:30:25 AM
Here is 2nj's post:

I knew what you meant, KeeptheFaith, without the correction.   

How did Mum know who Kermit was referring to????  I didn't have that equation right.  Must be an underground thing I'm not privy to.


I saw your post 2nj, and kind of nodded, wondering the same thing.  As far as underground and other such PRIVATE things, I'm not privy to any of that stuff either.  Oh well....

Yup...who's the mole?    ::MonkeyWink::

I stand with the Frog.
Mum did come out of the blue....what/who prompted that?
Thanks to all for ack me. ::MonkeyCool::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #787 12/24/08 -
Post by: snoopy on December 31, 2008, 12:31:03 AM
I do not want to go.  The cage is hopping tonight.  BUt I have to actually work on taxes.  I so hate it. 

Will be back tomorrow.  Everyone sleep well and pray for Justice for Natalee.



Good night KYcat


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #787 12/24/08 -
Post by: texasmom on December 31, 2008, 12:32:18 AM
I'm looking forward to what Kermit has to share tomm.  Should be interesting.

I think it might have already been shared, but I'm not sure if that was ALL of it. 


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #787 12/24/08 -
Post by: finngirl on December 31, 2008, 12:32:42 AM
My opinion --- several monkeys here have been conned. Most of them were "shango" enthusiasts.

yah!

and when the un-conned spoke up
we got the cold shoulder
and flimsy reassurances that those
"in the know" knew more/knew all

hah!



Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #787 12/24/08 -
Post by: snoopy on December 31, 2008, 12:33:21 AM
I'm looking forward to what Kermit has to share tomm.  Should be interesting.
I'm just catching up again, but I think Kermit has already told us. Seems Caps/Silvetti were plotting to take some of the "cage" evidence and plant it in the pond. That way the cage contents could go on being undetected.

Yep but I think Kermit has more to tell.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #787 12/24/08 -
Post by: San on December 31, 2008, 12:34:25 AM
My opinion --- several monkeys here have been conned. Most of them were "shango" enthusiasts.

yah!

and when the un-conned spoke up
we got the cold shoulder
and flimsy reassurances that those
"in the know" knew more/knew all
hah!


You are correct.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #787 12/24/08 -
Post by: MuffyBee on December 31, 2008, 12:34:33 AM
billb ~  I hope MumInOhio will want to talk about her reasons of doubt about Kermit tomorrow.

snoopy~ Glad you could catch up. 

KYcat ~  It's starting to sound like bedtime at the Walton's...


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #787 12/24/08 -
Post by: 2NJSons_Mom on December 31, 2008, 12:37:10 AM
My opinion --- several monkeys here have been conned. Most of them were "shango" enthusiasts.

I read there, and tried to contribute occasionally, but never had a grasp on any of it.  I tried, but didn't get there.  I guess it gave me additonal info to base my own opinions on without emailing and calling Tom, Dick and Harry plus Natalee's family, friends, OE, etc.  It's not me...jmho


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #787 12/24/08 -
Post by: snoopy on December 31, 2008, 12:37:18 AM
Thanks Muffy.  Ya'll have a good night.



Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #787 12/24/08 -
Post by: billb's daughter on December 31, 2008, 12:37:32 AM
I'm looking forward to what Kermit has to share tomm.  Should be interesting.
I'm just catching up again, but I think Kermit has already told us. Seems Caps/Silvetti were plotting to take some of the "cage" evidence and plant it in the pond. That way the cage contents could go on being undetected.
Wreck, I agree. But why? Was it to give some comfort to Beth, Dave, family (commendable on face value) but what may have been in the cage that could not be exposed? Was it a simple way for aruba to save face w/o given up secrets? Are the sloots worth all this this effort for coverup? Whgats in it for CAPS/Silvetti? Rhetorical I know...just thoughts...


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #787 12/24/08 -
Post by: Artcolley on December 31, 2008, 12:39:29 AM
I'm looking forward to what Kermit has to share tomm.  Should be interesting.
I'm just catching up again, but I think Kermit has already told us. Seems Caps/Silvetti were plotting to take some of the "cage" evidence and plant it in the pond. That way the cage contents could go on being undetected.


Sure sounds that way


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #787 12/24/08 -
Post by: San on December 31, 2008, 12:39:59 AM
The correct way to weigh yourself  

(http://i34.photobucket.com/albums/d118/Sanddrops/Weigh.jpg)

I can't believe I was doing it wrong all these years.

WE MUST SPREAD THE WORD.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #787 12/24/08 -
Post by: MuffyBee on December 31, 2008, 12:40:13 AM
Thanks Muffy.  Ya'll have a good night.



Are you heading to bed snoop?  If you are, pleasant dreams. 


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #787 12/24/08 -
Post by: Tibrogargan on December 31, 2008, 12:40:48 AM
My opinion --- several monkeys here have been conned. Most of them were "shango" enthusiasts.

yah!

and when the un-conned spoke up
we got the cold shoulder
and flimsy reassurances that those
"in the know" knew more/knew all

hah!



Yes Finngirl - a lot of us felt the same way.  I enjoyed the Shango thread for many months and had fun working on the puzzles with those I considered friends.  Then a group of the "experts"  seemed to switch track and follow very outlandish interpretations.
It became easier to just read and marvel at the way out theories.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #787 12/24/08 -
Post by: Artcolley on December 31, 2008, 12:41:54 AM
The correct way to weigh yourself  

(http://i34.photobucket.com/albums/d118/Sanddrops/Weigh.jpg)

I can't believe I was doing it wrong all these years.

WE MUST SPREAD THE WORD.


OH, So THAT is how its done! I like that, maybe I can become friends with my scale again  ::MonkeyHaHa::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #787 12/24/08 -
Post by: Tamikosmom on December 31, 2008, 12:42:09 AM
Quote
WHO IS DEFENDING KYLE AND CAPS?/b]

Now, if we remember Kathy Drenga (Hotshot)  - she is the one that went to Aruba with BestBuddy & uploaded the Aru-bay videos to her website and the photos of the Lions Den. THEN she is the one that felt Natalee was buried in the cometary. THEN she thought she was in the BAG that Blonde found and that photo was seen in National Enquirer. THEN Kathy Drenga (Hotshot) started talking with Kyle and also CAPS.
She is in the bag, and if you cant see that, i am sorry.  it is plain as day. joran himself says  he put her in the  mangroves, yeah after putting her  in a bag....Shes not been in only one place, we all know that.  And yes i did send CAPS to john,  what of it?

 ::MonkeyShocked::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #787 12/24/08 -
Post by: MuffyBee on December 31, 2008, 12:42:47 AM
I'm looking forward to what Kermit has to share tomm.  Should be interesting.
I'm just catching up again, but I think Kermit has already told us. Seems Caps/Silvetti were plotting to take some of the "cage" evidence and plant it in the pond. That way the cage contents could go on being undetected.
Wreck, I agree. But why? Was it to give some comfort to Beth, Dave, family (commendable on face value) but what may have been in the cage that could not be exposed? Was it a simple way for aruba to save face w/o given up secrets? Are the sloots worth all this this effort for coverup? Whgats in it for CAPS/Silvetti? Rhetorical I know...just thoughts...

I'm not Wreck, but those are five good questions/thoughts you have just posted, billb.  "Why"  indeed. 


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #787 12/24/08 -
Post by: wreck on December 31, 2008, 12:47:02 AM
I'm looking forward to what Kermit has to share tomm.  Should be interesting.
I'm just catching up again, but I think Kermit has already told us. Seems Caps/Silvetti were plotting to take some of the "cage" evidence and plant it in the pond. That way the cage contents could go on being undetected.
Wreck, I agree. But why? Was it to give some comfort to Beth, Dave, family (commendable on face value) but what may have been in the cage that could not be exposed? Was it a simple way for aruba to save face w/o given up secrets? Are the sloots worth all this this effort for coverup? Whgats in it for CAPS/Silvetti? Rhetorical I know...just thoughts...

I'm not Wreck, but those are five good questions/thoughts you have just posted, billb.  "Why"  indeed. 
Sorry I missed your post to me -- but Muffy said the same thing I would say!


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #787 12/24/08 -
Post by: crazybabyborg on December 31, 2008, 12:47:23 AM
I don't have anything against anyone who wanted to decipher the Shango. Different Strokes, you know. I just could never do it.

The same thing has always bothered me about Shango as does anything and anyone who does not just spit it out when it comes to achieving justice for victims, relief for the families, and resolution and accountability for crimes committed. IMO, If you have information relating to any of those things, then common decency, if for no other reason, should dictate that you come forward and speak plainly.

To make a game, secret, challenge, out of information relevent to any of those things is cruel to those who are hurting the most, and it really hacks me off.


HI GUYS!!!   ::MonkeyHaHa::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #787 12/24/08 -
Post by: truthseeker2 on December 31, 2008, 12:48:31 AM
My opinion --- several monkeys here have been conned. Most of them were "shango" enthusiasts.

I read there, and tried to contribute occasionally, but never had a grasp on any of it.  I tried, but didn't get there.  I guess it gave me additonal info to base my own opinions on without emailing and calling Tom, Dick and Harry plus Natalee's family, friends, OE, etc.  It's not me...jmho

I am a Shango enthusiast, but I have not been conned, even though some would say Shango in itself is a con.  I have my own views of the meaning of the riddle.  So far, I seem to be alone in my interpretation.  But, hey, it ain't easy being me anyway.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #787 12/24/08 -
Post by: wreck on December 31, 2008, 12:51:33 AM
I don't have anything against anyone who wanted to decipher the Shango. Different Strokes, you know. I just could never do it.

The same thing has always bothered me about Shango as does anything and anyone who does not just spit it out when it comes to achieving justice for victims, relief for the families, and resolution and accountability for crimes committed. IMO, If you have information relating to any of those things, then common decency, if for no other reason, should dictate that you come forward and speak plainly.

To make a game, secret, challenge, out of information relevent to any of those things is cruel to those who are hurting the most, and it really hacks me off.


HI GUYS!!!   ::MonkeyHaHa::
ABSOLUTELY!! "Shango" could have put an end to this 3++ years ago. It seemed to me "Shango" was being glorified when in all reality it was he who should have been cussed most!


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #787 12/24/08 -
Post by: Keepthefaith on December 31, 2008, 12:51:40 AM
My opinion --- several monkeys here have been conned. Most of them were "shango" enthusiasts.

I read there, and tried to contribute occasionally, but never had a grasp on any of it.  I tried, but didn't get there.  I guess it gave me additonal info to base my own opinions on without emailing and calling Tom, Dick and Harry plus Natalee's family, friends, OE, etc.  It's not me...jmho

I am a Shango enthusiast, but I have not been conned, even though some would say Shango in itself is a con.  I have my own views of the meaning of the riddle.  So far, I seem to be alone in my interpretation.  But, hey, it ain't easy being me anyway.

Do what ya do Truthseeker2.Who knows where your questions may take any of us.Whether we agree or disagree.that's what were here for.I still think if there was a way to really research the Power structure in Aruba and follow the money and how Paulus fits into that would be interesting!


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #787 12/24/08 -
Post by: truthseeker2 on December 31, 2008, 12:54:11 AM
My opinion --- several monkeys here have been conned. Most of them were "shango" enthusiasts.

I read there, and tried to contribute occasionally, but never had a grasp on any of it.  I tried, but didn't get there.  I guess it gave me additonal info to base my own opinions on without emailing and calling Tom, Dick and Harry plus Natalee's family, friends, OE, etc.  It's not me...jmho

I am a Shango enthusiast, but I have not been conned, even though some would say Shango in itself is a con.  I have my own views of the meaning of the riddle.  So far, I seem to be alone in my interpretation.  But, hey, it ain't easy being me anyway.

Do what ya do Truthseeker2.Who knows where your questions may take any of us.Whether we agree or disagree.that's what were here for.I still think if there was a way to really research the Power structure in Aruba and follow the money and how Paulus fits into that would be interesting!

Indeed.  Shango offered a picture of the power of Aruba long before we really understood what we see today.  Did he really know what happened to Natalee?  I don't know.  But when the news is slow...I always go back to Shango.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #787 12/24/08 -
Post by: Tamikosmom on December 31, 2008, 12:54:50 AM
To clarify

1.  Hotshot's real life name has been out there since almost the beginning of the case, mostly because she chose to do interviews and "put herself" out there.  Hotshots real life name is common knowledge to everyone that has followed this case.

2.  Kermit's name is not common knowledge, in fact, until Hotshot posted it I didn't know what it was.  That is why it's not ok to post Kermit's real life name.

3.  I have no idea where Kermit lives and do not correspond with Kermit outside this forum with the exception of one or two recent emails pertaining to the Kyle issue.  Never before. 

4.  I don't appreciate people spreading false rumors about me or others at SM. 

5.  SM is a discussion forum.  We are not beholden to anyone and take orders from no one.  The idea is to discuss different pieces of evidence and do our best to facilitate justice in missing persons cases.

6.  I don't agree with everything posted at SM and I don't expect people to always agree with me.  Just because it's posted does not mean everyone at SM feels the same. 


I could go on and on but why bother.  Nobody listens anyway, their egos get in the way.


I'm listening.

Hugs

Janet


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #787 12/24/08 -
Post by: MuffyBee on December 31, 2008, 12:55:07 AM
Quote
snip I still think if there was a way to really research the Power structure in Aruba and follow the money and how Paulus fits into that would be interesting!
 

Yes, KeepTheFaith, I think it would be beyond interesting.  I would say it would be quite revealing.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #787 12/24/08 -
Post by: crazybabyborg on December 31, 2008, 12:56:49 AM
I don't have anything against anyone who wanted to decipher the Shango. Different Strokes, you know. I just could never do it.

The same thing has always bothered me about Shango as does anything and anyone who does not just spit it out when it comes to achieving justice for victims, relief for the families, and resolution and accountability for crimes committed. IMO, If you have information relating to any of those things, then common decency, if for no other reason, should dictate that you come forward and speak plainly.

To make a game, secret, challenge, out of information relevent to any of those things is cruel to those who are hurting the most, and it really hacks me off.


HI GUYS!!!   ::MonkeyHaHa::
ABSOLUTELY!! "Shango" could have put an end to this 3++ years ago. It seemed to me "Shango" was being glorified when in all reality it was he who should have been cussed most!

I don't know what the legal definition of Obstruction of Justice is, but it would seem to me that if you have information you are witholding related to the perpetration of a crime, it should qualify as Obstruction of Justice, and it's a crime unto itself for a good reason.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #787 12/24/08 -
Post by: Keepthefaith on December 31, 2008, 12:59:22 AM
Quote
snip I still think if there was a way to really research the Power structure in Aruba and follow the money and how Paulus fits into that would be interesting!
 

Yes, KeepTheFaith, I think it would be beyond interesting.  I would say it would be quite revealing.


This is to Truthseeker2 as well.How do you do that on Aruba?Is Peter R Devries  not investigating the corruption still?Aruba is it's own entity..How would we begin to even attempt to put a Power Tree together and follow the money?


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #787 12/24/08 -
Post by: truthseeker2 on December 31, 2008, 01:01:19 AM
I don't have anything against anyone who wanted to decipher the Shango. Different Strokes, you know. I just could never do it.

The same thing has always bothered me about Shango as does anything and anyone who does not just spit it out when it comes to achieving justice for victims, relief for the families, and resolution and accountability for crimes committed. IMO, If you have information relating to any of those things, then common decency, if for no other reason, should dictate that you come forward and speak plainly.

To make a game, secret, challenge, out of information relevent to any of those things is cruel to those who are hurting the most, and it really hacks me off.


HI GUYS!!!   ::MonkeyHaHa::
ABSOLUTELY!! "Shango" could have put an end to this 3++ years ago. It seemed to me "Shango" was being glorified when in all reality it was he who should have been cussed most!

I don't know what the legal definition of Obstruction of Justice is, but it would seem to me that if you have information you are witholding related to the perpetration of a crime, it should qualify as Obstruction of Justice, and it's a crime unto itself for a good reason.

It's no doubt a moral obligation, but in Aruba I doubt it is a crime.  They will just find a way to classify you as a suspect so that you are expected to lie, so they don't believe anything you say.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #787 12/24/08 -
Post by: 2NJSons_Mom on December 31, 2008, 01:02:30 AM
G'nite all.  See you later.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #787 12/24/08 -
Post by: Tamikosmom on December 31, 2008, 01:02:41 AM
The correct way to weigh yourself  

(http://i34.photobucket.com/albums/d118/Sanddrops/Weigh.jpg)

I can't believe I was doing it wrong all these years.

WE MUST SPREAD THE WORD.


 ::MonkeyHaHa::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #787 12/24/08 -
Post by: Keepthefaith on December 31, 2008, 01:03:21 AM
To Klaas.Turkey melt and Taters.I work open to close at one of the family stores on Tuesday and friday's.Get tired of eating the food around the store so don't eat till i get home.That's how i have the grace to be on The forum so often.Run my own show and follow the Monkey's... ::MonkeyDance:: ::MonkeyDance::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #787 12/24/08 -
Post by: MuffyBee on December 31, 2008, 01:03:53 AM
Good night 2NJ (http://bestsmileys.com/sleeping/11.gif)


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #787 12/24/08 -
Post by: BUCKSHOT on December 31, 2008, 01:05:40 AM
My opinion --- several monkeys here have been conned. Most of them were "shango" enthusiasts.

yah!

and when the un-conned spoke up
we got the cold shoulder
and flimsy reassurances that those
"in the know" knew more/knew all

hah!



Looking back, posters have come aboard. Seemed to have all the answers. Spoke crypticly, gave vague (yet elaborate) explanations, implied to "be in the know", etc...

Then, they are challenged, and POOF... They disappear. Wonder why? Seems like they serve their purpose, and then vanish into thin air, only to resurface with fresh loads of bullshit.

Facts speak for themselves. Truth is truth. Fiction is fiction.

Does anyone ever get up, walk from their computer, and bang their head against the wall? Sometimes I can't seem to wrap my brain around what is fact and what is fiction.

Was this:
...a contrived plot, full of of drugs, porn videos, secret Lion's Dens, full of Elders, with a subplot of Columbian and Venezuelan druglords, high powered speedboats, casino mobsters. Sprinkle in (various) ponds, chocolate, ants, lighthouses, rock painting crews, Hitler references, mysterious witnesses, etc...

OR

...a group of locals, who spiked a girls drink (as probably done before to "last night" female tourists) seeking to have fun with a disadvantaged and unsuspecting girl. After (unexpected) accidental death, panick ensued and the father (who is known to be trained in the legal profession and has contacts) for advice. Rather than be faced with the negative stigma and bad publicity, a decision was made to dispose of, rather than report, the death. Due to the size and population of the island, and for fear of a black eye to a tourism industry, which masks other money related washing machine industries, close friends (who held prominent positions) went to work and sabotaged the investigation in an attempt to make it simply "go away." When international media descended, and because of lack of experience, they became defensive. Everyone clammed up. Strategies were put in place by high-powered minds to distract, disinform, and disrupt the heat. To this day, they continue to stick to their guns, never giving in to pressure and implications that a cover-up happened.

Is it simple or is it complicated? Ever wonder?


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #787 12/24/08 -
Post by: truthseeker2 on December 31, 2008, 01:07:10 AM
Quote
snip I still think if there was a way to really research the Power structure in Aruba and follow the money and how Paulus fits into that would be interesting!
 

Yes, KeepTheFaith, I think it would be beyond interesting.  I would say it would be quite revealing.


This is to Truthseeker2 as well.How do you do that on Aruba?Is Peter R Devries  not investigating the corruption still?Aruba is it's own entity..How would we begin to even attempt to put a Power Tree together and follow the money?

Well, what I have been looking at is the international connections...people associated with Aruba and other countries at the same time.  Some very interesting stuff.  I think Rob has also looked at a lot of this as well.  At this point I cannot find any connection to Paulus with regard to money.  I think he is a stop-gap type of guy.  He heads things off, if you will, using the convaluted legal system in Aruba.  That makes him valuable to some.  I think he is more political than he is industrious.

Some people were looking into Blackmore which is a company that was registered in Aruba on 5/15/05.  Some of the principals in this comapny have some shady backgrounds and have had bank accounts and assest frozen around the world due to drug trafficking.  They are an interesting group to say the least.  How much pull do they have on Aruba...hard to say.  They are certainly low-profile.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #787 12/24/08 -
Post by: klaasend on December 31, 2008, 01:07:34 AM
To Klaas.Turkey melt and Taters.I work open to close at one of the family stores on Tuesday and friday's.Get tired of eating the food around the store so don't eat till i get home.That's how i have the grace to be on The forum so often.Run my own show and follow the Monkey's... ::MonkeyDance:: ::MonkeyDance::

Ah, OK  ::MonkeyHaHa::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #787 12/24/08 -
Post by: wreck on December 31, 2008, 01:11:24 AM
My opinion --- several monkeys here have been conned. Most of them were "shango" enthusiasts.

yah!

and when the un-conned spoke up
we got the cold shoulder
and flimsy reassurances that those
"in the know" knew more/knew all

hah!



Looking back, posters have come aboard. Seemed to have all the answers. Spoke crypticly, gave vague (yet elaborate) explanations, implied to "be in the know", etc...

Then, they are challenged, and POOF... They disappear. Wonder why? Seems like they serve their purpose, and then vanish into thin air, only to resurface with fresh loads of bullshit.

Facts speak for themselves. Truth is truth. Fiction is fiction.

Does anyone ever get up, walk from their computer, and bang their head against the wall? Sometimes I can't seem to wrap my brain around what is fact and what is fiction.

Was this:
...a contrived plot, full of of drugs, porn videos, secret Lion's Dens, full of Elders, with a subplot of Columbian and Venezuelan druglords, high powered speedboats, casino mobsters. Sprinkle in (various) ponds, chocolate, ants, lighthouses, rock painting crews, Hitler references, mysterious witnesses, etc...

OR

...a group of locals, who spiked a girls drink (as probably done before to "last night" female tourists) seeking to have fun with a disadvantaged and unsuspecting girl. After (unexpected) accidental death, panick ensued and the father (who is known to be trained in the legal profession and has contacts) for advice. Rather than be faced with the negative stigma and bad publicity, a decision was made to dispose of, rather than report, the death. Due to the size and population of the island, and for fear of a black eye to a tourism industry, which masks other money related washing machine industries, close friends (who held prominent positions) went to work and sabotaged the investigation in an attempt to make it simply "go away." When international media descended, and because of lack of experience, they became defensive. Everyone clammed up. Strategies were put in place by high-powered minds to distract, disinform, and disrupt the heat. To this day, they continue to stick to their guns, never giving in to pressure and implications that a cover-up happened.

Is it simple or is it complicated? Ever wonder?
I suspect the latter story. It snowballed from a simple crime. They had NO idea the "Persistence" of one Beth Holloway.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #787 12/24/08 -
Post by: BUCKSHOT on December 31, 2008, 01:14:10 AM
Wonder what Kermit thinks of Patrick?


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #787 12/24/08 -
Post by: finngirl on December 31, 2008, 01:14:29 AM

this isn't easy to say but I'm feelin' froggy
so I'm just gonna leap:

last week or thereabouts I shared
re being duped into joining a private forum

some of that was misconstrued:
especially the part where I said "some" took credit
for the group's research

there were comments that "credit" shouldn't matter
but that wasn't my gripe/focus

if you'd been where I was and you'd been lied to/used ...
you woulda realized the obvious as I/others did:
credit matters very much
to those who present themselves (to the H/T families)
as the big case solvers ...
w/ financial gain/publicity/glory as their goals

I'm not gonna call anyone out
but it appears (to me) that these same shenannigans
are happening again/here/now

I'd love it if all concerned refused any reward/publicity/etc
when we bring the girl home
(which we will)

goooooooooo Kermit!



Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #787 12/24/08 -
Post by: truthseeker2 on December 31, 2008, 01:16:13 AM
Goodnight, monkeys.  Gotta work all day tomorrow.  Hopefully things will be really quiet since I have no conference calls scheduled and I can keep up with the forum from the office.



Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #787 12/24/08 -
Post by: Keepthefaith on December 31, 2008, 01:17:58 AM
Goodnight, monkeys.  Gotta work all day tomorrow.  Hopefully things will be really quiet since I have no conference calls scheduled and I can keep up with the forum from the office.



Goodnight Truthseeker2.Still like to know the power structure regardless of where it leads...


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #787 12/24/08 -
Post by: Tamikosmom on December 31, 2008, 01:18:53 AM
Sent to me by Natalee's Freebirds:

Please feel free (if you'd like) to post this at your board.
 
During the journey of the Persistence to Aruba, Kyle reached out and emailed with us.  During that time, one of the questions posed to him was regarding protocol if/when Natalee's remains were found.
 
Kyle's response was that he was unsure, but felt that would be settled before the search began.
 
The cautions were given to him about the lack of integrity on the part of Aruba's law enforcement, prosecutor's office, and its judiciary.
 
Contact with Kyle continued throughout the duration of the search by the Persistence.
 
Once back home, Kyle asked us for our help.  He was very concerned about the activities that transpired during their search - specifically surrounding the find of the fishing cage and its contents.  Kyle wanted our help in presenting this information in a factual way, to then be given to Natalee's family. 
 
This was March 18, 2008.  At that time, Kyle assured us he had just recently sent the images from the Dec 30th and Jan 7th dives to the FBI, but had never received a response from them.
 
We later found that to be false.
 
Also at that time, Beth's brother saw the images Kyle had shared with us - but none of the detail he shared later.

We compiled the images Kyle presented us, along with his opinions and the facts surrounding the sequence of events regarding that fishing cage.  Kyle stated he would be getting in touch with Beth Holloway.
 
We later found out that never happened.

At this time, Kyle shared with us the broadcast networks he had approached in February, in an attempt to sell these images to the highest bidder.
 
This didn't concern us greatly at that time - as we were under the impression US law enforcement and Natalee's family had already been made aware of their find.
 
Approximately May 2008 Kyle began dodging questions for details (we had asked for names of Aruban police and divers to be included in our documentation of these events), hedging on moving forward with this, and then he completely disappeared from our board.
 
During that time, we learned Kyle had never contacted Beth, or Dave, or the FBI with this information.
 
We put our original plan into motion - that of presenting this information in a clear and concise manner, and we sent it to Beth Holloway.
 
Beth was disturbed, needed time to digest the information, and wanted to share it with someone she trusts.
 
When Tim Miller was returning to Aruba this past fall, Beth gave us permission to release this information publicly.
 
At that point, we gave it to John Kelly, Carmen Adams with the FBI, and got it ready for public consumption.
 
The next step was to publish this information at our blog.
 
One of our members felt we were betraying Kyle in doing so, contacted him, and he re-surfaced at our site with threats of litigation against us - stating this was his "intellectual property" and we could not use it.
 
That of course concerned us greatly - as none of us could afford to be sued.
 
He also stated at that time, Luis Shaefer had just recently sold the rights of the video of these images to a broadcast company for the purposes of a documentary.
 
We contacted legal counsel and were advised to keep our distance from any Persistence crew member, in the face of potential obstruction/accessory charges.
 
At this point, one of our members decided to brace for the possibility of civil litigation, resigned from our membership to protect it from same, and posted what he knows to be factual at SM.
 
Kyle did tell us human remains were found in that fish cage.
 
Kyle did tell us about John Silvetti's intent to open an office on the island of Aruba, to enable him ease in conducting business in South America, and Aruba.
 
Kyle also told us of John's absolute refusal to give that fish cage and its contents any credence - before even it was inspected on Jan 7th.
 
Kyle told us in no uncertain terms that Tim Miller and Dateline were abruptly removed from the Persistence on Dec 30, resulting in only Persistence crew being aboard between that date and the Jan 7 dive of the Arubans.
 
Nothing that was posted at SM by kermit was incorrect, out of context, or in any way false.
 
Regards,
 
Former Natalee's Freebirds Administrator
Natalee and her family deserve justice - and we will not let up until they have it!



Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #787 12/24/08 -
Post by: Tamikosmom on December 31, 2008, 01:21:41 AM
GOOD NIGHT MONKEYS!!  GOOD NIGHT ZOOKEEPERS!!

Janet
10:20 PM


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #787 12/24/08 -
Post by: Keepthefaith on December 31, 2008, 01:23:58 AM
GOOD NIGHT MONKEYS!!  GOOD NIGHT ZOOKEEPERS!!

Janet
10:20 PM

Goodnight Janet..


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #787 12/24/08 -
Post by: billb's daughter on December 31, 2008, 01:24:18 AM


OR

...a group of locals, who spiked a girls drink (as probably done before to "last night" female tourists) seeking to have fun with a disadvantaged and unsuspecting girl. After (unexpected) accidental death, panick ensued and the father (who is known to be trained in the legal profession and has contacts) for advice. Rather than be faced with the negative stigma and bad publicity, a decision was made to dispose of, rather than report, the death. Due to the size and population of the island, and for fear of a black eye to a tourism industry, which masks other money related washing machine industries, close friends (who held prominent positions) went to work and sabotaged the investigation in an attempt to make it simply "go away." When international media descended, and because of lack of experience, they became defensive. Everyone clammed up. Strategies were put in place by high-powered minds to distract, disinform, and disrupt the heat. To this day, they continue to stick to their guns, never giving in to pressure and implications that a cover-up happened.

Is it simple or is it complicated? Ever wonder?
Simple makes the most sense. KISS  ::MonkeyCool::
The coverup snowballed to where everyone in the snowball chain compromised themselves and the Aruban Dutch feel entitled (how dare anyone/thing question me/us) and now it IS THEM against the truth seekers and truth seekers be damned. The judiciary has always been corrupt. it goes with the territory on aruba. It is so obvious that those in power on aruba control everything and can (and probably will) get away with the murder of Natalee. let the citizens of aruba take the brunt of the fallout (greatly diminished tourism-which the island depends on) while those in control continue their money laundering(banks - casinos)/free zone/pornography ways...That's the FOLLOW the MONEY reasoning that will deny Justice for Natalee.....
AND that is why it is of utmost importance to EXPOSE what transpired during the Persistence search and hopefully force aruba to return Natalee to her family...
JMHO   


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #787 12/24/08 -
Post by: texasmom on December 31, 2008, 01:24:59 AM
GOOD NIGHT MONKEYS!!  GOOD NIGHT ZOOKEEPERS!!

Janet
10:20 PM

Goodnight Janet!

And 2NJ, and Snoopy!  (I was working on something else for a bit...hope I didn't miss anyone else calling it a night!)

 ::MonkeyCool::



Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #787 12/24/08 -
Post by: MuffyBee on December 31, 2008, 01:27:35 AM
billb ~  :thumleft:

And to all the monkeys headed to the bunkey, good night


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #787 12/24/08 -
Post by: billb's daughter on December 31, 2008, 01:33:04 AM
Nite to all....KISS..
Happy New Year to all...Natalee will get Justice...only a matter of time ::MonkeyWink::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #787 12/24/08 -
Post by: crazybabyborg on December 31, 2008, 01:35:16 AM
Buckshot? You asked if anyone ever wondered if it was simple or complicated.

I've not only wondered, I've been on both sides of the issue..........repeatedly!

I've sort of settled into one conclusion. The cover up was complicated. That's it! That's all I feel sure about.   ::MonkeyHaHa::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #787 12/24/08 -
Post by: klaasend on December 31, 2008, 01:35:34 AM
Just because someone posts it here do not assume everyone agrees, we are simply taking in all sides so we can determine for ourselves what we want to believe.

Finngirl makes some valid points.  I have trusted Capslock and would still like to believe he is a good guy in all of this.  That said I don't agree with everything Caps says either.

If Kermit is wrong, please feel free to post why with an attempt to back it up with proof. 

With that, I'm calling it a night.

GOODNIGHT ALL!


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #787 12/24/08 -
Post by: texasmom on December 31, 2008, 01:36:35 AM
Nite to all....KISS..
Happy New Year to all...Natalee will get Justice...only a matter of time ::MonkeyWink::

Nite billb!  Good posts!   ::MonkeyCool::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #787 12/24/08 -
Post by: Tamikosmom on December 31, 2008, 01:36:53 AM

Simple makes the most sense. KISS  ::MonkeyCool::

The coverup snowballed to where everyone in the snowball chain compromised themselves and the Aruban Dutch feel entitled (how dare anyone/thing question me/us) and now it IS THEM against the truth seekers and truth seekers be damned. The judiciary has always been corrupt. it goes with the territory on aruba. It is so obvious that those in power on aruba control everything and can (and probably will) get away with the murder of Natalee. let the citizens of aruba take the brunt of the fallout (greatly diminished tourism-which the island depends on) while those in control continue their money laundering(banks - casinos)/free zone/pornography ways...That's the FOLLOW the MONEY reasoning that will deny Justice for Natalee.....
 
AND that is why it is of utmost importance to EXPOSE what transpired during the Persistence search and hopefully force aruba to return Natalee to her family...

JMHO   

Yes!!

billb ... the domino effect in regards to accountability for what happened on the morning of May 30, 2005 as well as the persuing coverup dictates that justice will never be forthcoming for Natalee Holloway from an Aruban or Dutch courtroom.

Pressure has to be brought upon Aruba by the FBI if the family is to be afforded a measure of closure.  The truth regarding the contents of the cage/trap needs to be exposed.

Janet

++++++++

'Scarborough Country' for July 14
updated 8:45 a.m. PT, Fri., July. 15, 2005

JUG TWITTY, NATALEE HOLLOWAY'S STEPFATHER:
Beth and I have been through this emotional roller coaster. And all we want is Natalee, whether she's alive or dead. We want to bring her back to the United States, and we'll leave and they can do whatever they want to do.

http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/8551824/





Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #787 12/24/08 -
Post by: Keepthefaith on December 31, 2008, 01:37:18 AM
Just because someone posts it here do not assume everyone agrees, we are simply taking in all sides so we can determine for ourselves what we want to believe.

Finngirl makes some valid points.  I have trusted Capslock and would still like to believe he is a good guy in all of this.  That said I don't agree with everything Caps says either.

If Kermit is wrong, please feel free to post why with an attempt to back it up with proof. 

With that, I'm calling it a night.

GOODNIGHT ALL!

Goodnight and thanx Klaas.Turkey melt and taters are FANTASTIC.. ::MonkeyDance::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #787 12/24/08 -
Post by: crazybabyborg on December 31, 2008, 01:37:32 AM
Just because someone posts it here do not assume everyone agrees, we are simply taking in all sides so we can determine for ourselves what we want to believe.

Finngirl makes some valid points.  I have trusted Capslock and would still like to believe he is a good guy in all of this.  That said I don't agree with everything Caps says either.

If Kermit is wrong, please feel free to post why with an attempt to back it up with proof. 

With that, I'm calling it a night.

GOODNIGHT ALL!

Goodnight, zoogeeper! Sleep Well, Klaas!


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #787 12/24/08 -
Post by: finngirl on December 31, 2008, 01:37:42 AM
Does anyone ever get up, walk from their computer, and bang their head against the wall? Sometimes I can't seem to wrap my brain around what is fact and what is fiction.

daily, sometimes hourly

Was this:
...a contrived plot, full of of drugs, porn videos, secret Lion's Dens, full of Elders, with a subplot of Columbian and Venezuelan druglords, high powered speedboats, casino mobsters. Sprinkle in (various) ponds, chocolate, ants, lighthouses, rock painting crews, Hitler references, mysterious witnesses, etc...

OR

...a group of locals, who spiked a girls drink (as probably done before to "last night" female tourists) seeking to have fun with a disadvantaged and unsuspecting girl. After (unexpected) accidental death, panick ensued and the father (who is known to be trained in the legal profession and has contacts) for advice. Rather than be faced with the negative stigma and bad publicity, a decision was made to dispose of, rather than report, the death. Due to the size and population of the island, and for fear of a black eye to a tourism industry, which masks other money related washing machine industries, close friends (who held prominent positions) went to work and sabotaged the investigation in an attempt to make it simply "go away." When international media descended, and because of lack of experience, they became defensive. Everyone clammed up. Strategies were put in place by high-powered minds to distract, disinform, and disrupt the heat. To this day, they continue to stick to their guns, never giving in to pressure and implications that a cover-up happened.

Is it simple or is it complicated? Ever wonder?

a combination of both?

the locale and the careers of some players
complicated an otherwise simple scenario?

locale: corrupt/steamy resort
careers: atty/PvdS and polis/vdStraten

the locale provided the petri dish
and the careers provided the bacteria

the scenario could have been smaller
if the persons involved were blue collar
and the locale didn't involve tourists/casinos/etc

shango's basic story is very simple
when you strip away the elaborate imagery



Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #787 12/24/08 -
Post by: texasmom on December 31, 2008, 01:40:16 AM
Just because someone posts it here do not assume everyone agrees, we are simply taking in all sides so we can determine for ourselves what we want to believe.

Finngirl makes some valid points.  I have trusted Capslock and would still like to believe he is a good guy in all of this.  That said I don't agree with everything Caps says either.

If Kermit is wrong, please feel free to post why with an attempt to back it up with proof. 

With that, I'm calling it a night.

GOODNIGHT ALL!

I'm right there with you concerning Caps, Klaas.  Maybe I'm one of the "conned" that's been referred to, but I'm still hoping that's not true. 


Goodnight Klaas!  Thanks again for all you do!   ::MonkeyCool::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #787 12/24/08 -
Post by: Magnolia on December 31, 2008, 01:43:37 AM
To clarify

1.  Hotshot's real life name has been out there since almost the beginning of the case, mostly because she chose to do interviews and "put herself" out there.  Hotshots real life name is common knowledge to everyone that has followed this case.

2.  Kermit's name is not common knowledge, in fact, until Hotshot posted it I didn't know what it was.  That is why it's not ok to post Kermit's real life name.

3.  I have no idea where Kermit lives and do not correspond with Kermit outside this forum with the exception of one or two recent emails pertaining to the Kyle issue.  Never before. 

4.  I don't appreciate people spreading false rumors about me or others at SM. 

5.  SM is a discussion forum.  We are not beholden to anyone and take orders from no one.  The idea is to discuss different pieces of evidence and do our best to facilitate justice in missing persons cases.

6.  I don't agree with everything posted at SM and I don't expect people to always agree with me.  Just because it's posted does not mean everyone at SM feels the same. 


I could go on and on but why bother.  Nobody listens anyway, their egos get in the way.


I'm listening.

Hugs

Janet

I listen to your every word, Klaas.
BTW that is not Kermit's real name.  That is Kermit's cover.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #787 12/24/08 -
Post by: finngirl on December 31, 2008, 01:44:08 AM

'k, well, hasta luego  :cool:



Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #787 12/24/08 -
Post by: finngirl on December 31, 2008, 01:46:18 AM
BTW that is not Kermit's real name.  That is Kermit's cover.

so I googled for nothing? bah!  :roll: :wink:





Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #787 12/24/08 -
Post by: billb's daughter on December 31, 2008, 01:49:44 AM

Simple makes the most sense. KISS  ::MonkeyCool::

The coverup snowballed to where everyone in the snowball chain compromised themselves and the Aruban Dutch feel entitled (how dare anyone/thing question me/us) and now it IS THEM against the truth seekers and truth seekers be damned. The judiciary has always been corrupt. it goes with the territory on aruba. It is so obvious that those in power on aruba control everything and can (and probably will) get away with the murder of Natalee. let the citizens of aruba take the brunt of the fallout (greatly diminished tourism-which the island depends on) while those in control continue their money laundering(banks - casinos)/free zone/pornography ways...That's the FOLLOW the MONEY reasoning that will deny Justice for Natalee.....
 
AND that is why it is of utmost importance to EXPOSE what transpired during the Persistence search and hopefully force aruba to return Natalee to her family...

JMHO   

Yes!!

billb ... the domino effect in regards to accountability for what happened on the morning of May 30, 2005 as well as the persuing coverup dictates that justice will never be forthcoming for Natalee Holloway from an Aruban or Dutch courtroom.

Pressure has to be brought upon Aruba by the FBI if the family is to be afforded a measure of closure.  The truth regarding the contents of the cage/trap needs to be exposed.

Janet

++++++++

'Scarborough Country' for July 14
updated 8:45 a.m. PT, Fri., July. 15, 2005

JUG TWITTY, NATALEE HOLLOWAY'S STEPFATHER:
Beth and I have been through this emotional roller coaster. And all we want is Natalee, whether she's alive or dead. We want to bring her back to the United States, and we'll leave and they can do whatever they want to do.

http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/8551824/




Janet....I used to think that Justice for Natalee would come forth in the disclosure of her demise and the prosecution of the perps.....I was naive because I had never been exposed to the cowardice and arrogance of those in charge that perpetrated what we see today. 3yrs 7 months later...Just let Natalee's family bring her home....The hell with them that would deny that...they will (don't care what their personal beliefs are)  answer to a higher authority, in this life or the next..... 


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #787 12/24/08 -
Post by: Keepthefaith on December 31, 2008, 01:50:18 AM
Just because someone posts it here do not assume everyone agrees, we are simply taking in all sides so we can determine for ourselves what we want to believe.

Finngirl makes some valid points.  I have trusted Capslock and would still like to believe he is a good guy in all of this.  That said I don't agree with everything Caps says either.

If Kermit is wrong, please feel free to post why with an attempt to back it up with proof. 

With that, I'm calling it a night.

GOODNIGHT ALL!

I'm right there with you concerning Caps, Klaas.  Maybe I'm one of the "conned" that's been referred to, but I'm still hoping that's not true. 


Goodnight Klaas!  Thanks again for all you do!   ::MonkeyCool::

Hotshot said that Caps won't post here anymore!Wonder why?  ::MonkeyConfused::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #787 12/24/08 -
Post by: texasmom on December 31, 2008, 01:53:19 AM
Just because someone posts it here do not assume everyone agrees, we are simply taking in all sides so we can determine for ourselves what we want to believe.

Finngirl makes some valid points.  I have trusted Capslock and would still like to believe he is a good guy in all of this.  That said I don't agree with everything Caps says either.

If Kermit is wrong, please feel free to post why with an attempt to back it up with proof. 

With that, I'm calling it a night.

GOODNIGHT ALL!

I'm right there with you concerning Caps, Klaas.  Maybe I'm one of the "conned" that's been referred to, but I'm still hoping that's not true. 


Goodnight Klaas!  Thanks again for all you do!   ::MonkeyCool::

Hotshot said that Caps won't post here anymore!Wonder why?  ::MonkeyConfused::

My opinion, long story short; he's been lied to about a LOT of things and pulled into the chatngrumble group.  JMO 


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #787 12/24/08 -
Post by: billb's daughter on December 31, 2008, 01:54:07 AM
To clarify

1.  Hotshot's real life name has been out there since almost the beginning of the case, mostly because she chose to do interviews and "put herself" out there.  Hotshots real life name is common knowledge to everyone that has followed this case.

2.  Kermit's name is not common knowledge, in fact, until Hotshot posted it I didn't know what it was.  That is why it's not ok to post Kermit's real life name.

3.  I have no idea where Kermit lives and do not correspond with Kermit outside this forum with the exception of one or two recent emails pertaining to the Kyle issue.  Never before. 

4.  I don't appreciate people spreading false rumors about me or others at SM. 

5.  SM is a discussion forum.  We are not beholden to anyone and take orders from no one.  The idea is to discuss different pieces of evidence and do our best to facilitate justice in missing persons cases.

6.  I don't agree with everything posted at SM and I don't expect people to always agree with me.  Just because it's posted does not mean everyone at SM feels the same. 


I could go on and on but why bother.  Nobody listens anyway, their egos get in the way.


I'm listening.

Hugs

Janet

I listen to your every word, Klaas.
BTW that is not Kermit's real name.  That is Kermit's cover.
Sweet...Another reason I stand with the frog!


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #787 12/24/08 -
Post by: Keepthefaith on December 31, 2008, 01:57:33 AM
Just because someone posts it here do not assume everyone agrees, we are simply taking in all sides so we can determine for ourselves what we want to believe.

Finngirl makes some valid points.  I have trusted Capslock and would still like to believe he is a good guy in all of this.  That said I don't agree with everything Caps says either.

If Kermit is wrong, please feel free to post why with an attempt to back it up with proof. 

With that, I'm calling it a night.

GOODNIGHT ALL!

I'm right there with you concerning Caps, Klaas.  Maybe I'm one of the "conned" that's been referred to, but I'm still hoping that's not true. 


Goodnight Klaas!  Thanks again for all you do!   ::MonkeyCool::

Hotshot said that Caps won't post here anymore!Wonder why?  ::MonkeyConfused::

My opinion, long story short; he's been lied to about a LOT of things and pulled into the chatngrumble group.  JMO 

It's unfortunate to say the least!I hope Caps doesn't listen to what he's told by other's who may have ulterior motives...


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #787 12/24/08 -
Post by: texasmom on December 31, 2008, 02:03:03 AM
Just because someone posts it here do not assume everyone agrees, we are simply taking in all sides so we can determine for ourselves what we want to believe.

Finngirl makes some valid points.  I have trusted Capslock and would still like to believe he is a good guy in all of this.  That said I don't agree with everything Caps says either.

If Kermit is wrong, please feel free to post why with an attempt to back it up with proof. 

With that, I'm calling it a night.

GOODNIGHT ALL!

I'm right there with you concerning Caps, Klaas.  Maybe I'm one of the "conned" that's been referred to, but I'm still hoping that's not true. 


Goodnight Klaas!  Thanks again for all you do!   ::MonkeyCool::

Hotshot said that Caps won't post here anymore!Wonder why?  ::MonkeyConfused::

My opinion, long story short; he's been lied to about a LOT of things and pulled into the chatngrumble group.  JMO 

It's unfortunate to say the least!I hope Caps doesn't listen to what he's told by other's who may have ulterior motives...

I honestly don't know what he really believes.  I can only say that the only communication I've had with him recently is to answer questions that stem from lies he has been told about me.  I have been honest with him, that's all I can do.   


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #787 12/24/08 -
Post by: Magnolia on December 31, 2008, 02:07:34 AM
Just because someone posts it here do not assume everyone agrees, we are simply taking in all sides so we can determine for ourselves what we want to believe.

Finngirl makes some valid points.  I have trusted Capslock and would still like to believe he is a good guy in all of this.  That said I don't agree with everything Caps says either.

If Kermit is wrong, please feel free to post why with an attempt to back it up with proof. 

With that, I'm calling it a night.

GOODNIGHT ALL!

I'm right there with you concerning Caps, Klaas.  Maybe I'm one of the "conned" that's been referred to, but I'm still hoping that's not true. 


Goodnight Klaas!  Thanks again for all you do!   ::MonkeyCool::

Hotshot said that Caps won't post here anymore!Wonder why?  ::MonkeyConfused::

My opinion, long story short; he's been lied to about a LOT of things and pulled into the chatngrumble group.  JMO 

My thoughts too, TM


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #787 12/24/08 -
Post by: Keepthefaith on December 31, 2008, 02:09:11 AM
Just because someone posts it here do not assume everyone agrees, we are simply taking in all sides so we can determine for ourselves what we want to believe.

Finngirl makes some valid points.  I have trusted Capslock and would still like to believe he is a good guy in all of this.  That said I don't agree with everything Caps says either.

If Kermit is wrong, please feel free to post why with an attempt to back it up with proof. 

With that, I'm calling it a night.

GOODNIGHT ALL!

I'm right there with you concerning Caps, Klaas.  Maybe I'm one of the "conned" that's been referred to, but I'm still hoping that's not true. 


Goodnight Klaas!  Thanks again for all you do!   ::MonkeyCool::

Hotshot said that Caps won't post here anymore!Wonder why?  ::MonkeyConfused::

My opinion, long story short; he's been lied to about a LOT of things and pulled into the chatngrumble group.  JMO 

It's unfortunate to say the least!I hope Caps doesn't listen to what he's told by other's who may have ulterior motives...

I honestly don't know what he really believes.  I can only say that the only communication I've had with him recently is to answer questions that stem from lies he has been told about me.  I have been honest with him, that's all I can do.   

If you hear from him.Tell him he is always welcome to Scared Monkey's!


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #787 12/24/08 -
Post by: crazybabyborg on December 31, 2008, 02:09:43 AM
(http://i25.photobucket.com/albums/c100/crazybabyborgs/MOD/modlock4.gif)


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #787 12/24/08 -
Post by: texasmom on December 31, 2008, 02:12:23 AM
Just because someone posts it here do not assume everyone agrees, we are simply taking in all sides so we can determine for ourselves what we want to believe.

Finngirl makes some valid points.  I have trusted Capslock and would still like to believe he is a good guy in all of this.  That said I don't agree with everything Caps says either.

If Kermit is wrong, please feel free to post why with an attempt to back it up with proof. 

With that, I'm calling it a night.

GOODNIGHT ALL!

I'm right there with you concerning Caps, Klaas.  Maybe I'm one of the "conned" that's been referred to, but I'm still hoping that's not true. 


Goodnight Klaas!  Thanks again for all you do!   ::MonkeyCool::

Hotshot said that Caps won't post here anymore!Wonder why?  ::MonkeyConfused::

My opinion, long story short; he's been lied to about a LOT of things and pulled into the chatngrumble group.  JMO 

It's unfortunate to say the least!I hope Caps doesn't listen to what he's told by other's who may have ulterior motives...

I honestly don't know what he really believes.  I can only say that the only communication I've had with him recently is to answer questions that stem from lies he has been told about me.  I have been honest with him, that's all I can do.   

If you hear from him.Tell him he is always welcome to Scared Monkey's!

I think he knows that, but if I have the opportunity; I'll do it!   ::MonkeyCool::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #787 12/24/08 -
Post by: Keepthefaith on December 31, 2008, 02:18:58 AM
Just because someone posts it here do not assume everyone agrees, we are simply taking in all sides so we can determine for ourselves what we want to believe.

Finngirl makes some valid points.  I have trusted Capslock and would still like to believe he is a good guy in all of this.  That said I don't agree with everything Caps says either.

If Kermit is wrong, please feel free to post why with an attempt to back it up with proof. 

With that, I'm calling it a night.

GOODNIGHT ALL!

I'm right there with you concerning Caps, Klaas.  Maybe I'm one of the "conned" that's been referred to, but I'm still hoping that's not true. 


Goodnight Klaas!  Thanks again for all you do!   ::MonkeyCool::

Hotshot said that Caps won't post here anymore!Wonder why?  ::MonkeyConfused::

My opinion, long story short; he's been lied to about a LOT of things and pulled into the chatngrumble group.  JMO 

It's unfortunate to say the least!I hope Caps doesn't listen to what he's told by other's who may have ulterior motives...

I honestly don't know what he really believes.  I can only say that the only communication I've had with him recently is to answer questions that stem from lies he has been told about me.  I have been honest with him, that's all I can do.   

If you hear from him.Tell him he is always welcome to Scared Monkey's!

I think he knows that, but if I have the opportunity; I'll do it!   ::MonkeyCool::

.........................JUSTICE FOR NATALEE...........................TRUTH.....IT WILL PREVAIL........


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #787 12/24/08 -
Post by: texasmom on December 31, 2008, 02:19:29 AM
To clarify

1.  Hotshot's real life name has been out there since almost the beginning of the case, mostly because she chose to do interviews and "put herself" out there.  Hotshots real life name is common knowledge to everyone that has followed this case.

2.  Kermit's name is not common knowledge, in fact, until Hotshot posted it I didn't know what it was.  That is why it's not ok to post Kermit's real life name.

3.  I have no idea where Kermit lives and do not correspond with Kermit outside this forum with the exception of one or two recent emails pertaining to the Kyle issue.  Never before. 

4.  I don't appreciate people spreading false rumors about me or others at SM. 

5.  SM is a discussion forum.  We are not beholden to anyone and take orders from no one.  The idea is to discuss different pieces of evidence and do our best to facilitate justice in missing persons cases.

6.  I don't agree with everything posted at SM and I don't expect people to always agree with me.  Just because it's posted does not mean everyone at SM feels the same. 


I could go on and on but why bother.  Nobody listens anyway, their egos get in the way.


I'm listening.

Hugs

Janet

I listen to your every word, Klaas.
BTW that is not Kermit's real name.  That is Kermit's cover.
Sweet...Another reason I stand with the frog!

Yeah, that is pretty cool!   ::MonkeyCool::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #787 12/24/08 -
Post by: texasmom on December 31, 2008, 02:20:34 AM


I agree Keepthefaith!   ::MonkeyDance::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #787 12/24/08 -
Post by: billb's daughter on December 31, 2008, 02:24:57 AM
Just because someone posts it here do not assume everyone agrees, we are simply taking in all sides so we can determine for ourselves what we want to believe.

Finngirl makes some valid points.  I have trusted Capslock and would still like to believe he is a good guy in all of this.  That said I don't agree with everything Caps says either.

If Kermit is wrong, please feel free to post why with an attempt to back it up with proof. 

With that, I'm calling it a night.

GOODNIGHT ALL!

I'm right there with you concerning Caps, Klaas.  Maybe I'm one of the "conned" that's been referred to, but I'm still hoping that's not true. 


Goodnight Klaas!  Thanks again for all you do!   ::MonkeyCool::

Hotshot said that Caps won't post here anymore!Wonder why?  ::MonkeyConfused::

My opinion, long story short; he's been lied to about a LOT of things and pulled into the chatngrumble group.  JMO 

It's unfortunate to say the least!I hope Caps doesn't listen to what he's told by other's who may have ulterior motives...

I honestly don't know what he really believes.  I can only say that the only communication I've had with him recently is to answer questions that stem from lies he has been told about me.  I have been honest with him, that's all I can do.   
Unless Caps comes on SM and responds to the posts that questions his/her motives, I'll tend to believe the posts can not be countered by Caps....Same as I believe Kyle won't come back to counter posts negative to him.
I wanted to believe Caps...but without hearing from him and with what Kermit has posted. I lean towards Caps being a diversion, whether intentional or not (he may have been led unwillingly-I don't know).
I just can't buy into the reasoning put forth by some that Caps/kyle won't post again on SM because they somehow feel that they have been wronged ::MonkeyEek:: We are here to search for Justice for Natalee....I say to Caps/Kyle.... defend your positions or be regarded as untrustworthy....what do you have to hide if you have truth on your side? I want to believe...give me reasons to believe...others trying to defend you just don't cut it with me...


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #787 12/24/08 -
Post by: Keepthefaith on December 31, 2008, 02:28:59 AM


I agree Keepthefaith!   ::MonkeyDance::

I'm off to bed TM.I'm still awaiting some answers from some questions i posed to Hotshot and ldstlou.I Keepthefaith maybe one day they will answer!No more drive-by posts!goodnight... ::MonkeyDance:: ::MonkeyDance::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #787 12/24/08 -
Post by: Keepthefaith on December 31, 2008, 02:33:32 AM
Just because someone posts it here do not assume everyone agrees, we are simply taking in all sides so we can determine for ourselves what we want to believe.

Finngirl makes some valid points.  I have trusted Capslock and would still like to believe he is a good guy in all of this.  That said I don't agree with everything Caps says either.

If Kermit is wrong, please feel free to post why with an attempt to back it up with proof. 

With that, I'm calling it a night.

GOODNIGHT ALL!

I'm right there with you concerning Caps, Klaas.  Maybe I'm one of the "conned" that's been referred to, but I'm still hoping that's not true. 


Goodnight Klaas!  Thanks again for all you do!   ::MonkeyCool::

Hotshot said that Caps won't post here anymore!Wonder why?  ::MonkeyConfused::

My opinion, long story short; he's been lied to about a LOT of things and pulled into the chatngrumble group.  JMO 

It's unfortunate to say the least!I hope Caps doesn't listen to what he's told by other's who may have ulterior motives...

I honestly don't know what he really believes.  I can only say that the only communication I've had with him recently is to answer questions that stem from lies he has been told about me.  I have been honest with him, that's all I can do.   
Unless Caps comes on SM and responds to the posts that questions his/her motives, I'll tend to believe the posts can not be countered by Caps....Same as I believe Kyle won't come back to counter posts negative to him.
I wanted to believe Caps...but without hearing from him and with what Kermit has posted. I lean towards Caps being a diversion, whether intentional or not (he may have been led unwillingly-I don't know).
I just can't buy into the reasoning put forth by some that Caps/kyle won't post again on SM because they somehow feel that they have been wronged ::MonkeyEek:: We are here to search for Justice for Natalee....I say to Caps/Kyle.... defend your positions or be regarded as untrustworthy....what do you have to hide if you have truth on your side? I want to believe...give me reasons to believe...others trying to defend you just don't cut it with me...


I agree BillB!Posters need to quit speaking on Caps/Kyle's behalf.Period.I will say it again.I stand,hop,as well as ribbit with the Frog!


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #787 12/24/08 -
Post by: billb's daughter on December 31, 2008, 02:44:08 AM
Just because someone posts it here do not assume everyone agrees, we are simply taking in all sides so we can determine for ourselves what we want to believe.

Finngirl makes some valid points.  I have trusted Capslock and would still like to believe he is a good guy in all of this.  That said I don't agree with everything Caps says either.

If Kermit is wrong, please feel free to post why with an attempt to back it up with proof. 

With that, I'm calling it a night.

GOODNIGHT ALL!

I'm right there with you concerning Caps, Klaas.  Maybe I'm one of the "conned" that's been referred to, but I'm still hoping that's not true. 


Goodnight Klaas!  Thanks again for all you do!   ::MonkeyCool::

Hotshot said that Caps won't post here anymore!Wonder why?  ::MonkeyConfused::

My opinion, long story short; he's been lied to about a LOT of things and pulled into the chatngrumble group.  JMO 

It's unfortunate to say the least!I hope Caps doesn't listen to what he's told by other's who may have ulterior motives...

I honestly don't know what he really believes.  I can only say that the only communication I've had with him recently is to answer questions that stem from lies he has been told about me.  I have been honest with him, that's all I can do.   
Unless Caps comes on SM and responds to the posts that questions his/her motives, I'll tend to believe the posts can not be countered by Caps....Same as I believe Kyle won't come back to counter posts negative to him.
I wanted to believe Caps...but without hearing from him and with what Kermit has posted. I lean towards Caps being a diversion, whether intentional or not (he may have been led unwillingly-I don't know).
I just can't buy into the reasoning put forth by some that Caps/kyle won't post again on SM because they somehow feel that they have been wronged ::MonkeyEek:: We are here to search for Justice for Natalee....I say to Caps/Kyle.... defend your positions or be regarded as untrustworthy....what do you have to hide if you have truth on your side? I want to believe...give me reasons to believe...others trying to defend you just don't cut it with me...


I agree BillB!Posters need to quit speaking on Caps/Kyle's behalf.Period.I will say it again.I stand,hop,as well as ribbit with the Frog!
KeeptheFaith,
Yep Yep...I also stand, stand..hop, hop...and ribbit, ribbit with the frog, frog....excuse me please, i think i have hiccups.... ::MonkeyLaugh::
just my attempt AT HUMOR ::MonkeyCool::
Good nite all.....


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #787 12/24/08 -
Post by: texasmom on December 31, 2008, 02:46:04 AM
Just because someone posts it here do not assume everyone agrees, we are simply taking in all sides so we can determine for ourselves what we want to believe.

Finngirl makes some valid points.  I have trusted Capslock and would still like to believe he is a good guy in all of this.  That said I don't agree with everything Caps says either.

If Kermit is wrong, please feel free to post why with an attempt to back it up with proof. 

With that, I'm calling it a night.

GOODNIGHT ALL!

I'm right there with you concerning Caps, Klaas.  Maybe I'm one of the "conned" that's been referred to, but I'm still hoping that's not true. 


Goodnight Klaas!  Thanks again for all you do!   ::MonkeyCool::

Hotshot said that Caps won't post here anymore!Wonder why?  ::MonkeyConfused::

My opinion, long story short; he's been lied to about a LOT of things and pulled into the chatngrumble group.  JMO 

It's unfortunate to say the least!I hope Caps doesn't listen to what he's told by other's who may have ulterior motives...

I honestly don't know what he really believes.  I can only say that the only communication I've had with him recently is to answer questions that stem from lies he has been told about me.  I have been honest with him, that's all I can do.   
Unless Caps comes on SM and responds to the posts that questions his/her motives, I'll tend to believe the posts can not be countered by Caps....Same as I believe Kyle won't come back to counter posts negative to him.
I wanted to believe Caps...but without hearing from him and with what Kermit has posted. I lean towards Caps being a diversion, whether intentional or not (he may have been led unwillingly-I don't know).
I just can't buy into the reasoning put forth by some that Caps/kyle won't post again on SM because they somehow feel that they have been wronged ::MonkeyEek:: We are here to search for Justice for Natalee....I say to Caps/Kyle.... defend your positions or be regarded as untrustworthy....what do you have to hide if you have truth on your side? I want to believe...give me reasons to believe...others trying to defend you just don't cut it with me...

I agree billb.  It doesn't cut it with me either.  Caps should know better than to believe a LOT of what he's being told.  He is a very intelligent man.  He should see the agenda behind one source especially that is feeding him misinformation.  I know that if he is one of the good guys, that he has to be careful about what he does post here; many people read here.  But on the other hand, I also believe that he is staying away in an attempt to "punish" the monkeys for allowing the accusations against him.  I said a while back, Caps can take up for himself; he is quite capable.  But I think he's buying into the crap some are feeding him.  Many here have been open to Caps theories, and many have stood by him.  But if he chooses to take the same route Kyle has, and let drive by posters speak for him....well that's a shame.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #787 12/24/08 -
Post by: billb's daughter on December 31, 2008, 02:49:36 AM
Just because someone posts it here do not assume everyone agrees, we are simply taking in all sides so we can determine for ourselves what we want to believe.

Finngirl makes some valid points.  I have trusted Capslock and would still like to believe he is a good guy in all of this.  That said I don't agree with everything Caps says either.

If Kermit is wrong, please feel free to post why with an attempt to back it up with proof. 

With that, I'm calling it a night.

GOODNIGHT ALL!

I'm right there with you concerning Caps, Klaas.  Maybe I'm one of the "conned" that's been referred to, but I'm still hoping that's not true. 


Goodnight Klaas!  Thanks again for all you do!   ::MonkeyCool::

Hotshot said that Caps won't post here anymore!Wonder why?  ::MonkeyConfused::

My opinion, long story short; he's been lied to about a LOT of things and pulled into the chatngrumble group.  JMO 

It's unfortunate to say the least!I hope Caps doesn't listen to what he's told by other's who may have ulterior motives...

I honestly don't know what he really believes.  I can only say that the only communication I've had with him recently is to answer questions that stem from lies he has been told about me.  I have been honest with him, that's all I can do.   
Unless Caps comes on SM and responds to the posts that questions his/her motives, I'll tend to believe the posts can not be countered by Caps....Same as I believe Kyle won't come back to counter posts negative to him.
I wanted to believe Caps...but without hearing from him and with what Kermit has posted. I lean towards Caps being a diversion, whether intentional or not (he may have been led unwillingly-I don't know).
I just can't buy into the reasoning put forth by some that Caps/kyle won't post again on SM because they somehow feel that they have been wronged ::MonkeyEek:: We are here to search for Justice for Natalee....I say to Caps/Kyle.... defend your positions or be regarded as untrustworthy....what do you have to hide if you have truth on your side? I want to believe...give me reasons to believe...others trying to defend you just don't cut it with me...

I agree billb.  It doesn't cut it with me either.  Caps should know better than to believe a LOT of what he's being told.  He is a very intelligent man.  He should see the agenda behind one source especially that is feeding him misinformation.  I know that if he is one of the good guys, that he has to be careful about what he does post here; many people read here.  But on the other hand, I also believe that he is staying away in an attempt to "punish" the monkeys for allowing the accusations against him.  I said a while back, Caps can take up for himself; he is quite capable.  But I think he's buying into the crap some are feeding him.  Many here have been open to Caps theories, and many have stood by him.  But if he chooses to take the same route Kyle has, and let drive by posters speak for him....well that's a shame.
Thanks TM...
Caps....give us reasons to believe in you....we want too...


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #787 12/24/08 -
Post by: texasmom on December 31, 2008, 02:55:03 AM
I agree billb... ::MonkeyCool::

I could post a pic of Anita that would scare those hiccups away....maybe just the thought of it will do!

 ::MonkeyHaHa::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #787 12/24/08 -
Post by: billb's daughter on December 31, 2008, 02:59:41 AM
I agree billb... ::MonkeyCool::

I could post a pic of Anita that would scare those hiccups away....maybe just the thought of it will do!

 ::MonkeyHaHa::
No more hiccups for me.... the thought of a pic of anita has cured me forever! can we bottle that? without scaring the heck out of the rest of the free world? Oh well, on second thought...never mind..can't be done.. ::MonkeyCool::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #787 12/24/08 -
Post by: texasmom on December 31, 2008, 03:01:17 AM
I agree billb... ::MonkeyCool::

I could post a pic of Anita that would scare those hiccups away....maybe just the thought of it will do!

 ::MonkeyHaHa::
No more hiccups for me.... the thought of a pic of anita has cured me forever! can we bottle that? without scaring the heck out of the rest of the free world? Oh well, on second thought...never mind..can't be done.. ::MonkeyCool::

 ::MonkeyHaHa::  Goodnight billb! 


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #787 12/24/08 -
Post by: texasmom on December 31, 2008, 03:06:38 AM
(http://i21.photobucket.com/albums/b258/texasmom55/Natalee/CarpePicNatalee1.png)

                   JUSTICE FOR NATALEE!!!!


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #787 12/24/08 -
Post by: texasmom on December 31, 2008, 03:07:39 AM



Goodnight everyone!   ::MonkeyCool::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #787 12/24/08 -
Post by: billb's daughter on December 31, 2008, 03:51:05 AM
I'm waiting for answer's but think i'll be waiting for a long time!This is for either ldstlou or Hotshot.Please explain to everyone who is not in the know as to why we shouldn't belive Kermit???I'll wait your answer...TIA
MumInOhio seems to have issues with Kermit also. I'd be interested in her take on why we should not believe Kermit...
I stand with the frog...
ps..i thought there was room for CAPS version being the "what happened to Natalee" and Kermit's version "on where Natalee ended up".
With all the Kermit bashing from a few, who incidentally offer not any backup, and the silence from Kyle and CAPS, "I'm inclined to believe" those attacking Kermit have a different agenda wrt Justice for Natalee....
IT IS ALL ABOUT GETTING NATALEE HOME after 3 + years! Justice will come, in this life or the next for the preps.
OK...I get it that everyone is caught up in the moment....but I'd really appreciate it if at least ONE person acknowledged my posts...Please don't make me go back to Clint Eastwood and Paint your Wagon...I talk to the trees.... ::MonkeyCool::

OK I will answer your post.  I agree.
San,
Thanks....don't tell the other moderators...but i like you the most...


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #787 12/24/08 -
Post by: texasmom on December 31, 2008, 04:17:27 AM
12/31/2008 Solo di Pueblo Ed 2 Pg 40

(Page heading) resumen of news internacional 2008

(http://i21.photobucket.com/albums/b258/texasmom55/HollowayCaseNews1/12312008SoloDiPuebloEd2Pg40.jpg)

Papiamentu translation:

according peter r. de vries of hulanda: the caso natalee holloway-ta resolve’ husticia at aruba have indicacionnan new in the caso of natalee holloway. the indicacionnan here is come of the reportero of crimen peter r. de vries cu owing to tell cu el’a resolve the caso. according de vries for lunanan largo el’a as one accion of camara scondi at aruba y now the caso is resolvi. the does not owing to tell if el’a follow joran van der sloot cu camara. according de vries, natalee already do not at life. el’a informa the mother this. natalee owing to desparece at half 2005. according ministerio publico joran owing to see the damita here bibo because; the last person. owing to close the investigacion at december. husticia not was have sufficient proof for persigui joran van der sloot.



Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #787 12/24/08 -
Post by: MumInOhio on December 31, 2008, 05:21:30 AM
I knew what you meant, KeeptheFaith, without the correction.   ::MonkeyWink::

How did Mum know who Kermit was referring to????  I didn't have that equation right.  Must be an underground thing I'm not privy to.    :smt102


2NJS...Mum asked Kermit before her last visit if she was in email contact with Caps and never got a reply, because Kermit posted whart she said was an email from Caps.

And I still haven't seen anything.

And I have to leave soon and can't finish reading.

But Kermit I saw 2 posts by you and neither have addressed your cutting and pasting bits of posts to prove your point. From November 13 th. I have questioned you doing this in posts.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #787 12/24/08 -
Post by: MumInOhio on December 31, 2008, 05:27:31 AM
Kermit..

A lot of what you have posted is a bunch of cut and posted posts from Shango...It is totally incorrect and out of context.

And those that aren't familiar with Shango may buy it...

Shame on you!!!!!!!!!

Thank You for replying to my question from your last visit I see you were not in direct email contact with Caps...
Mum,
I've always looked forward to you posts and respect the analysis you provide.
but....your comment seems to come right out of the blue..
What is totally incorrect and out of context?
thanks, billb

God himself only knows what the heck you are trying to imply with Lalas and Lisa as I didn't bother to read it.






Billb...Kermit has taken bits of discussions from the Shango thread and used them to make it look like Caps changed from one pond to another to another. We were dissecting Shango and Simian.

I picked up on this because I was familiar with the posts when Kermit first did this in November.  I posted about it more than once. Kermit continues to do it.

To me it is dishonest.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #787 12/24/08 -
Post by: MumInOhio on December 31, 2008, 06:13:28 AM
I'm waiting for answer's but think i'll be waiting for a long time!This is for either ldstlou or Hotshot.Please explain to everyone who is not in the know as to why we shouldn't belive Kermit???I'll wait your answer...TIA
MumInOhio seems to have issues with Kermit also. I'd be interested in her take on why we should not believe Kermit...
I stand with the frog...
ps..i thought there was room for CAPS version being the "what happened to Natalee" and Kermit's version "on where Natalee ended up".
With all the Kermit bashing from a few, who incidentally offer not any backup, and the silence from Kyle and CAPS, "I'm inclined to believe" those attacking Kermit have a different agenda wrt Justice for Natalee....
IT IS ALL ABOUT GETTING NATALEE HOME after 3 + years! Justice will come, in this life or the next for the preps.

Billb...I have questioned Kermit's backup since November 13th. I posted about this.  How can I believe all of what Kermit posts when what I can check on and remember is flawed. How can I possibly believe what I can't check.

Until recently I had the utmosr respect for Kermit.

I posted back in April my concerns about Caps. Those concerns haven't changed.  I just have not posted about them.  They are not exactly the same as some here believe.

I have to leave to get my DH to a appointment. I will be back in a few hours. God Willing!


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #787 12/24/08 -
Post by: Hotshot on December 31, 2008, 07:24:32 AM
I'm waiting for answer's but think i'll be waiting for a long time!This is for either ldstlou or Hotshot.Please explain to everyone who is not in the know as to why we shouldn't belive Kermit???I'll wait your answer...TIA
MumInOhio seems to have issues with Kermit also. I'd be interested in her take on why we should not believe Kermit...
I stand with the frog...
ps..i thought there was room for CAPS version being the "what happened to Natalee" and Kermit's version "on where Natalee ended up".
With all the Kermit bashing from a few, who incidentally offer not any backup, and the silence from Kyle and CAPS, "I'm inclined to believe" those attacking Kermit have a different agenda wrt Justice for Natalee....
IT IS ALL ABOUT GETTING NATALEE HOME after 3 + years! Justice will come, in this life or the next for the preps.
Itis all about getting Natalee back.  Not making something out  of nothing like kermit has done. She knows damn well it was upto others to get all information to  the FBI, and Kyles job did not include that....Silvetti was the head of this ship,  and what ever he has done, ishim.  Hedid go back to aruba,  why???  to search the pond again.  Not  to  strike up a deal with a pipeline.  Either you are with the Holloways or not, and when  you talk the  persistance down,  you are talking down about the holloways.... That is a back stabbing to them. No-one knows more then  us what they were  up against in aruba, more then we do.  i dont  think they were briefed to the fullest as to who to trust, or anything like that.  obviously silvetti was overtaken  by  the arubans.  I never said that kermit was all wrong, she just isn't all correct, and is taking some things out of context to suit her purpose.

I am not a drive by.  I work long hours now, I read in the morning when i wake up, go to work, get paid, come home, work again, eat, read again,  then  go to sleep an hour later.   dont  be calling me a driveby... once again, talking before you know the answers..

Sound like *******?  Well at least i sound like someone who is doing something, and not taking stuff from someone that is only trying to start trouble....so I take that as a compliment. 

I am sure I'll be banned next because  I dont  think like the majority here,so be it... So before i go to work, to all those who care, have a safe holiday, and a good new year...

No Klaas my other post was not a threat....


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #787 12/24/08 -
Post by: wingnut on December 31, 2008, 07:24:44 AM
I have posted alongside Kermit for 1-1/2 years and still don't know his real name - LOL.  It doesn't matter - it doesn't matter - it doesn't matter. 

*Where are the contents of the cage?  How can we confirm that the FBI ever received authentic samples?*


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #787 12/24/08 -
Post by: Hotshot on December 31, 2008, 07:27:23 AM
I'm looking forward to what Kermit has to share tomm.  Should be interesting.
I'm just catching up again, but I think Kermit has already told us. Seems Caps/Silvetti were plotting to take some of the "cage" evidence and plant it in the pond. That way the cage contents could go on being undetected.

What are you smoking?


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #787 12/24/08 -
Post by: Buckeye on December 31, 2008, 08:01:55 AM
I have a tendency to lean towards BUCKSHOT'S second theory, the same as wreck and billb.  I am open to include a death that was not accidental but rather the result of a purposeful assault.  I am also open to some type of direct involvement of Paulus.

One thing for sure, the island was/is astute with marketing.  There is a huge marketing budget.  The "university" has a tourism major.  It is reasonable to believe that this group saw the situation and US media and FBI/DEA as a threat to their marketing strategy.  They grouped together to save the island...not Joran.

I have not closed the door to other theories.  I pay attention to Edward's trafficking info to colombo's gamblers and all the others.

If I had not been here since day one and if I was a good person, it would not take much for me to listen to anyone with a theory and believe his/her take on it.  There may be good people involved that have been influenced by someone that strongly believe in only one theory. The disadvantage to that "newer" good person is that they don't know the possible other scenarios.

The disadvantage of a closed forum is that there is no real challenge to a thought.  One theory can be reinforced and built upon.  That theory may end up looking very strong and people may try to manipulate information to influence others (especially the "less informed" in open forums).

It is probably best to post facts or statements and let many minds dissect the info.  It doesn't take long to figure out what's what.  I always paid attention to most of the posters that I guess are now at the chat/grumble/spew site. I guess I don't understand why they can not just post info instead of posting why others should not post info.

In the end, I'll believe what I believe...not because someone "in the know" tells me I should.

 


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #787 12/24/08 -
Post by: Blonde on December 31, 2008, 08:12:27 AM
Just remember Kyle did lie to us a few times

Posts: 830




           Re: Natalee Case Discussion #776 11/19-08
« Reply #631 on: Today at 04:16:24 PM »   Quote Modify Remove Split Topic

Quote from: oceanexploration on Today at 04:00:07 PM
Quote from: SS on November 19, 2008, 08:37:02 PM
John Silvetti - red shirt
Dolf Richardson
Hans Mos

Who are the others?

BTW, this is certainly NOT John Silvetti.  I do not know this man.  He was with the Arubans who came on board for the Dec-30th meeting.

Good afternoon monkeys,

Thanks OCEAN EX for setting us straight.  Well monkeys, the guy in the red shirt, NOT SILVETTI, came on with Arubans and we still need to identify him.

Very helpful.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #787 12/24/08 -
Post by: sharon on December 31, 2008, 08:17:48 AM
I have posted alongside Kermit for 1-1/2 years and still don't know his real name - LOL.  It doesn't matter - it doesn't matter - it doesn't matter. 

*Where are the contents of the cage?  How can we confirm that the FBI ever received authentic samples?*


 ::MonkeyHaHa:: ::MonkeyHaHa::

And if this was a cosmic 'wtf' -- what about the OTHER 100 VIABLE targets??????

I guess funding requirements have not been met.

 ::MonkeyTongue::

Happy New Year


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #787 12/24/08 -
Post by: jen3560 on December 31, 2008, 08:21:21 AM



That could be.  It's just hard to tell from this pic.  I still want to know why no one, even Tim Miller and Dateline, did not question the thumbs down if this image was taken 60 seconds after that thumbs down.  I think that is one of the reasons why I have been skeptical about what we are seeing with that pic.

This may have already been answered (I'm just trying to catch up with the thread) Kyle stated two things about that "thumbs down" indication by Tim Trahan.

1 - There was no pre-determined signal for an uncertain sighting

2 - A large skate had swum by right before that, disturbed the silt from the ocean floor, and affected visibility.

Tim Miller - well, he told Dateline (after he had been booted from the boat) that it looks like a skull - still looks like a skull.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #787 12/24/08 -
Post by: Nut44x4 on December 31, 2008, 08:24:07 AM
Need to run out for a while this morning. Once I return, I will be here for the duration of the day/evening/night. Later.........   ::MonkeyCool::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #787 12/24/08 -
Post by: wreck on December 31, 2008, 08:43:45 AM
I'm looking forward to what Kermit has to share tomm.  Should be interesting.
I'm just catching up again, but I think Kermit has already told us. Seems Caps/Silvetti were plotting to take some of the "cage" evidence and plant it in the pond. That way the cage contents could go on being undetected.

What are you smoking?
That is what I read Kermit telling us in her last post. Unfortunately, I am afraid the evidence is pointing to that. Have you called Dave yet????


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #787 12/24/08 -
Post by: jen3560 on December 31, 2008, 08:50:43 AM
I'm looking forward to what Kermit has to share tomm.  Should be interesting.
I'm just catching up again, but I think Kermit has already told us. Seems Caps/Silvetti were plotting to take some of the "cage" evidence and plant it in the pond. That way the cage contents could go on being undetected.


Sure sounds that way

Check out all of Hotshot's posts since Kermit started posting all of this in November.  There are two specifically that I'm remembering, and I will search them out again when I get a chance.

In two of her posts, she talks about removing evidence from the fish cage.....


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #787 12/24/08 -
Post by: Blonde on December 31, 2008, 09:06:03 AM
Need to run out for a while this morning. Once I return, I will be here for the duration of the day/evening/night. Later.........   ::MonkeyCool::
Thank God, because I'm real sick and going to the Dr's at 10:00 and will be in bed for the rest of the day. Eyes hurt too , so it's hard to read. Sorry Guys I'm not much help this week.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #787 12/24/08 -
Post by: jen3560 on December 31, 2008, 09:06:32 AM
Kermit..

A lot of what you have posted is a bunch of cut and posted posts from Shango...It is totally incorrect and out of context.

And those that aren't familiar with Shango may buy it...

Shame on you!!!!!!!!!

Thank You for replying to my question from your last visit I see you were not in direct email contact with Caps...
Mum,
I've always looked forward to you posts and respect the analysis you provide.
but....your comment seems to come right out of the blue..
What is totally incorrect and out of context?
thanks, billb

God himself only knows what the heck you are trying to imply with Lalas and Lisa as I didn't bother to read it.






Billb...Kermit has taken bits of discussions from the Shango thread and used them to make it look like Caps changed from one pond to another to another. We were dissecting Shango and Simian.

I picked up on this because I was familiar with the posts when Kermit first did this in November.  I posted about it more than once. Kermit continues to do it.

To me it is dishonest.

Mum,

If you look at the dates of those posts by Caps, versus the date he sent his email to Dave Holloway of "I know where she is" and including the post by Caps about all Dave needs to do is get some pumps to bring her home......

Well - you'll see that Caps was still jumping from pond to pond to pond at the time he was stating those things.

Then miraculously comes this "witness" that Caps kept saying over and over was needed.

Then all of a sudden it's the Monserrat pond - not any of the other two ponds Caps was discussing (those other ponds were still his focus when he emailed Dave).

Combine that with Hotshot claiming to be the one who put Caps and this "witness" in touch with John Silvetti.

Take that one step further, and look at Silvetti's utter lack of attention to that cage - to the point where he cussed at Kyle for trying to pursue the matter.

Then look at Hot Shot's posts about removing items from the cage.

Then look at Caps posts regarding a shoe and human remains in the pond......


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #787 12/24/08 -
Post by: wreck on December 31, 2008, 09:13:39 AM
Kermit..

A lot of what you have posted is a bunch of cut and posted posts from Shango...It is totally incorrect and out of context.

And those that aren't familiar with Shango may buy it...

Shame on you!!!!!!!!!

Thank You for replying to my question from your last visit I see you were not in direct email contact with Caps...
Mum,
I've always looked forward to you posts and respect the analysis you provide.
but....your comment seems to come right out of the blue..
What is totally incorrect and out of context?
thanks, billb

God himself only knows what the heck you are trying to imply with Lalas and Lisa as I didn't bother to read it.






Billb...Kermit has taken bits of discussions from the Shango thread and used them to make it look like Caps changed from one pond to another to another. We were dissecting Shango and Simian.

I picked up on this because I was familiar with the posts when Kermit first did this in November.  I posted about it more than once. Kermit continues to do it.

To me it is dishonest.

Mum,

If you look at the dates of those posts by Caps, versus the date he sent his email to Dave Holloway of "I know where she is" and including the post by Caps about all Dave needs to do is get some pumps to bring her home......

Well - you'll see that Caps was still jumping from pond to pond to pond at the time he was stating those things.

Then miraculously comes this "witness" that Caps kept saying over and over was needed.

Then all of a sudden it's the Monserrat pond - not any of the other two ponds Caps was discussing (those other ponds were still his focus when he emailed Dave).

Combine that with Hotshot claiming to be the one who put Caps and this "witness" in touch with John Silvetti.

Take that one step further, and look at Silvetti's utter lack of attention to that cage - to the point where he cussed at Kyle for trying to pursue the matter.

Then look at Hot Shot's posts about removing items from the cage.

Then look at Caps posts regarding a shoe and human remains in the pond......
Scary how this is coming together.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #787 12/24/08 -
Post by: jen3560 on December 31, 2008, 09:25:29 AM

Scary how this is coming together.

Isn't it though?

It begs the question.............are these people lying?

Is Hot Shot lying and just wanting to be the center of attention?

Is Caps lying to further some agenda of his/Aruba's/Silvetti's?

I was under the impression that it was Dave Holloway himself who put caps and this "witness" in touch with Silvetti - after the email from Caps to Dave.

Was it Dave?  Or was it Hot Shot?


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #787 12/24/08 -
Post by: Ree on December 31, 2008, 09:25:46 AM
I'm just a lurker here most of the time and I don't know anybody.  I do however, notice that the same 3 or 4 posters show up at the same time to bash Kermie and/or defend Kyle or Caps.  Kyle and Caps are big boys who can take up for themselves, if they feel the need.  As far as Kermie, cutting and pasting and sharing emails, maybe if some of these people had been willing to share with everybody, none of this would have been necessary.  If what was going on was dangerous to the investigation, all the truly vested parties know how to contact Red and tell us to shut up.  Personally, I'm rather tired of the distraction created everytime these few show up to disrupt. ::MonkeyConfused::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #787 12/24/08 -
Post by: jen3560 on December 31, 2008, 09:28:00 AM
Buckeye - I admire and respect the way your mind works.

Remember, Freebirds always said "You Decide".

What is the truth?  Take the facts as we know them, remove emotion, feelings, and sometimes friendships as well - and just look at the facts.

What do the facts tell you is the truth?  You Decide.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #787 12/24/08 -
Post by: jen3560 on December 31, 2008, 09:29:58 AM
I'm just a lurker here most of the time and I don't know anybody.  I do however, notice that the same 3 or 4 posters show up at the same time to bash Kermie and/or defend Kyle or Caps.  Kyle and Caps are big boys who can take up for themselves, if they feel the need.  As far as Kermie, cutting and pasting and sharing emails, maybe if some of these people had been willing to share with everybody, none of this would have been necessary.  If what was going on was dangerous to the investigation, all the truly vested parties know how to contact Red and tell us to shut up.  Personally, I'm rather tired of the distraction created everytime these few show up to disrupt. ::MonkeyConfused::

Very good points, Ree.

Not only do the vested parties know how to contact Red - they also know how to contact Freebirds.

No one EVER told Freebirds to not publish the images and Kyle's concerns and facts about that trap and its contents.

Quite the contrary, in fact.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #787 12/24/08 -
Post by: Rob on December 31, 2008, 09:34:37 AM
Yanno Kath, it's about time someone told you so you don't spend the rest of your life in HERO STATUS - but you're(edit). I hope you are not back here in the New Year just like Caps and that cowardly Kyle.

I would have banned your ass so long ago you wouldn't even remember this board.

And btw - one more thing - your brand of helping has helped no one. That's the kind of "help" we can all do without.

Edit: No name calling.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #787 12/24/08 -
Post by: Magnolia on December 31, 2008, 09:36:03 AM
Kermit..

A lot of what you have posted is a bunch of cut and posted posts from Shango...It is totally incorrect and out of context.

And those that aren't familiar with Shango may buy it...

Shame on you!!!!!!!!!

Thank You for replying to my question from your last visit I see you were not in direct email contact with Caps...
Mum,
I've always looked forward to you posts and respect the analysis you provide.
but....your comment seems to come right out of the blue..
What is totally incorrect and out of context?
thanks, billb

God himself only knows what the heck you are trying to imply with Lalas and Lisa as I didn't bother to read it.






Billb...Kermit has taken bits of discussions from the Shango thread and used them to make it look like Caps changed from one pond to another to another. We were dissecting Shango and Simian.

I picked up on this because I was familiar with the posts when Kermit first did this in November.  I posted about it more than once. Kermit continues to do it.

To me it is dishonest.

Mum,

If you look at the dates of those posts by Caps, versus the date he sent his email to Dave Holloway of "I know where she is" and including the post by Caps about all Dave needs to do is get some pumps to bring her home......

Well - you'll see that Caps was still jumping from pond to pond to pond at the time he was stating those things.

Then miraculously comes this "witness" that Caps kept saying over and over was needed.

Then all of a sudden it's the Monserrat pond - not any of the other two ponds Caps was discussing (those other ponds were still his focus when he emailed Dave).

Combine that with Hotshot claiming to be the one who put Caps and this "witness" in touch with John Silvetti.

Take that one step further, and look at Silvetti's utter lack of attention to that cage - to the point where he cussed at Kyle for trying to pursue the matter.

Then look at Hot Shot's posts about removing items from the cage.

Then look at Caps posts regarding a shoe and human remains in the pond......

Thank you Jen for stating that so well.  I have read every word of Shango
and realize what you stated is true.  I do not think Kermit's post are taken
out of context.  I think Caps used the Shango riddles to get his and Silvetti's
story into the minds of posters.  Shango is sorta like the Bible, it can have
many intretations to suit any situation.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #787 12/24/08 -
Post by: Ree on December 31, 2008, 09:39:51 AM
I've heard reference a couple of times to ChatnGrumble and ******* and Destiny leaving.  I must have missed that episode.  Can somebody fill me in on what happened?


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #787 12/24/08 -
Post by: Magnolia on December 31, 2008, 09:49:10 AM
I've heard reference a couple of times to ChatnGrumble and ******* and Destiny leaving.  I must have missed that episode.  Can somebody fill me in on what happened?

Well, I am not the expert on this subject, but will try to answer.
Destiny and ******* started up their own private forum.
It is invite only... so I have been told.  Many old monkeys have
gone there to Grunt&Grumble.  The forum started as an offshoot
of the Caylee thread, but when the  Kyle business started a lot
of monkeys abandoned us for the other forum.
They bash Klaas.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #787 12/24/08 -
Post by: Ree on December 31, 2008, 09:51:28 AM
I've heard reference a couple of times to ChatnGrumble and ******* and Destiny leaving.  I must have missed that episode.  Can somebody fill me in on what happened?

Well, I am not the expert on this subject, but will try to answer.
Destiny and ******* started up their own private forum.
It is invite only... so I have been told.  Many old monkeys have
gone there to Grunt&Grumble.  The forum started as an offshoot
of the Caylee thread, but when the  Kyle business started a lot
of monkeys abandoned us for the other forum.
They bash Klaas.

Well, bashing Klass is just doggone Unamerican!!!!!  Good riddance whoever you are.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #787 12/24/08 -
Post by: sharon on December 31, 2008, 09:52:38 AM
Not that I want to divert any flying bananas  -- nor do I think kermie needs the help -- but there were SEVERAL OF US that were confused by CAPS 'changing' posts about 'da pond'.   ::MonkeyConfused:: And so we questioned it. And 'attempted' to discuss it.


sharon
Scared Monkey

Online

Posts: 2464

Re: Natalee Case Discussion #776 11/19-08
« Reply #633 on: November 20, 2008, 04:21:53 PM »   
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Quote from: Scandi on November 20, 2008, 03:52:22 PM
Hi,  I just wanted to clarify something re the ponds.

Are the pond at the Dam of Monserat and the Moko pond two different ponds?

The new male witness account with the augmented statement is mentioned as having Joran walking from Monserat by that man's house.

Yet it is the Moko pond which is quite close to Joran's house, and the pond full of old machinery {an old quarry} and where the searchers quit the same day they started.  There are photos of this pond on pp138 of the Shango Thread.  xox

I'm confused, too Scandi 

Maybe someone 'in the know' can clarify???

Jan 31 - Caps is talking about MOKO
Feb 26 - Caps is posting - the Slinja Pond
Feb 28 = crew searched pond - photo in newspaper at MONTSERAT
 
 


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #787 12/24/08 -
Post by: Helen Back on December 31, 2008, 09:56:27 AM
I've heard reference a couple of times to ChatnGrumble and ******* and Destiny leaving.  I must have missed that episode.  Can somebody fill me in on what happened?

Well, I am not the expert on this subject, but will try to answer.
Destiny and ******* started up their own private forum.
It is invite only... so I have been told.  Many old monkeys have
gone there to Grunt&Grumble.  The forum started as an offshoot
of the Caylee thread, but when the  Kyle business started a lot
of monkeys abandoned us for the other forum.
They bash Klaas.

 ::MonkeyShocked::

 ::MonkeyNoNo:: ::MonkeyNoNo::



Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #787 12/24/08 -
Post by: jen3560 on December 31, 2008, 10:06:25 AM
Here are some of those posts of HotShot's I was referring to, about removing evidence from the trap:

Re: Natalee Case Discussion #781 12/3/08 -
« Reply #285 on: Today at 12:48:24 AM »

You all seem to jump to conclusions that everything was handed over to the incompetent ALE....... Did you ever stop to think that maybe there was a reason they took off so fast? Do you really think they are that stupid to not cover their butts? Hellooooo, Tim has been through it already, many times. Loose lips do sink ships. Maybe we are not supposed to be discussing those things here for everyone like Aruba to read. ----------------------

November 24, 2008, 12:21:05 AM

And speaking of heros, if in deed any of the people from the Persistance does have any evidence that was tested here in the states, they are heros too.  After 3+ years of the BS going on in Aruba and their way of doing things, I sure would have taken evidence also.  not for me, for the family.  I have said that since we have known them to be messing with us.  "IF" Kermit was actually on this boat, she had to be from the Date Line Crew.  Kermit has to clear things from washington first?  Wow, thats a big step.  Who does she know?  Sure as hell DC didnt do anything to help the Holloways except for the Condi thing.  Which in all reality did nothing.  We all know that Joran will NEVER get charged, so what is the next best thing?  Getting real closure for the family, getting some thing of Natalee to bring home and bury?  Yes.  If any of this has to do with what I have just stated, then I say good for them.  It was nice enough for these gentlemen to go out of their way for months to go to a corrupt island, and looking for a missing girl on their time.  During the holidays to say the least.  I commend them.  No-one else would do it, and we all know Aruba wouldn't do it.  If they did scan for their pipe line, which I highly doubt, then so be it.  They searched for Natalee in the process.  Maybe they told Aruba they were there for that, and id the opposite.  who knows.  Either way, they are still heros in my mind, and this Kermit is not playing nice.  i don't know what she is trying to screw with, or what her motive is.  But in my opinion, "IF" any of this is to be true, I still say it's all good.  Markme as being bad, but I would have done the same thing, and maybe even I have


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #787 12/24/08 -
Post by: Buckeye on December 31, 2008, 10:06:38 AM
Buckeye - I admire and respect the way your mind works.

Remember, Freebirds always said "You Decide".

What is the truth?  Take the facts as we know them, remove emotion, feelings, and sometimes friendships as well - and just look at the facts.

What do the facts tell you is the truth?  You Decide.

I do have a little question.  JQK seemed to want to run with the trafficking story.  I just wonder if that is to bring the case to a level of international involvement.  This could permit an international investigation.  The investigation may come to the conclusion that there was no trafficking and the remains were hidden in a cage.  Is it important to "believe" in a bigger theory to legally involve more than internet posters and hidey hole sleuths??


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #787 12/24/08 -
Post by: jen3560 on December 31, 2008, 10:08:02 AM

Thank you Jen for stating that so well.  I have read every word of Shango
and realize what you stated is true.  I do not think Kermit's post are taken
out of context.  I think Caps used the Shango riddles to get his and Silvetti's
story into the minds of posters.  Shango is sorta like the Bible, it can have
many intretations to suit any situation.

Hi Magnolia!

YW, and thank you!

From your post, and also from Sharon's - it seems many monkeys noticed this.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #787 12/24/08 -
Post by: jen3560 on December 31, 2008, 10:09:21 AM
Buckeye - I admire and respect the way your mind works.

Remember, Freebirds always said "You Decide".

What is the truth?  Take the facts as we know them, remove emotion, feelings, and sometimes friendships as well - and just look at the facts.

What do the facts tell you is the truth?  You Decide.

I do have a little question.  JQK seemed to want to run with the trafficking story.  I just wonder if that is to bring the case to a level of international involvement.  This could permit an international investigation.  The investigation may come to the conclusion that there was no trafficking and the remains were hidden in a cage.  Is it important to "believe" in a bigger theory to legally involve more than internet posters and hidey hole sleuths??

That is precisely my take on it, Buckeye.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #787 12/24/08 -
Post by: Buckeye on December 31, 2008, 10:11:30 AM
Here are some of those posts of HotShot's I was referring to, about removing evidence from the trap:

Re: Natalee Case Discussion #781 12/3/08 -
« Reply #285 on: Today at 12:48:24 AM »

You all seem to jump to conclusions that everything was handed over to the incompetent ALE....... Did you ever stop to think that maybe there was a reason they took off so fast? Do you really think they are that stupid to not cover their butts? Hellooooo, Tim has been through it already, many times. Loose lips do sink ships. Maybe we are not supposed to be discussing those things here for everyone like Aruba to read. ----------------------

November 24, 2008, 12:21:05 AM

And speaking of heros, if in deed any of the people from the Persistance does have any evidence that was tested here in the states, they are heros too.  After 3+ years of the BS going on in Aruba and their way of doing things, I sure would have taken evidence also.  not for me, for the family.  I have said that since we have known them to be messing with us.  "IF" Kermit was actually on this boat, she had to be from the Date Line Crew.  Kermit has to clear things from washington first?  Wow, thats a big step.  Who does she know?  Sure as hell DC didnt do anything to help the Holloways except for the Condi thing.  Which in all reality did nothing.  We all know that Joran will NEVER get charged, so what is the next best thing?  Getting real closure for the family, getting some thing of Natalee to bring home and bury?  Yes.  If any of this has to do with what I have just stated, then I say good for them.  It was nice enough for these gentlemen to go out of their way for months to go to a corrupt island, and looking for a missing girl on their time.  During the holidays to say the least.  I commend them.  No-one else would do it, and we all know Aruba wouldn't do it.  If they did scan for their pipe line, which I highly doubt, then so be it.  They searched for Natalee in the process.  Maybe they told Aruba they were there for that, and id the opposite.  who knows.  Either way, they are still heros in my mind, and this Kermit is not playing nice.  i don't know what she is trying to screw with, or what her motive is.  But in my opinion, "IF" any of this is to be true, I still say it's all good.  Markme as being bad, but I would have done the same thing, and maybe even I have

IIRC...The red refers to a sample of the white plastic-like stuff at the rocks...perhaps recovered on a Hotshot trip to Aruba...IIRC


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #787 12/24/08 -
Post by: Magnolia on December 31, 2008, 10:13:36 AM
I remember a post...I think.

What was Kyle doing with a shoe?  He is just a boat guy.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #787 12/24/08 -
Post by: jen3560 on December 31, 2008, 10:14:12 AM
That could very well be, Buckeye.

It just makes me wonder, since she also inserted herself into the whole caps/pond witness shenanigans.

Put that together with Caps' assertions that there is a sneaker and human remains in that pond.........well.

There cannot be 3 shoes.

One was in Joran's closet with blood on it, according to Beth.

One appears to have been in that cage on the ocean floor.

So where did the 3rd shoe come from that Caps says is in the pond?

Or is Caps not being truthful about that?


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #787 12/24/08 -
Post by: Buckeye on December 31, 2008, 10:14:52 AM
Buckeye - I admire and respect the way your mind works.

Remember, Freebirds always said "You Decide".

What is the truth?  Take the facts as we know them, remove emotion, feelings, and sometimes friendships as well - and just look at the facts.

What do the facts tell you is the truth?  You Decide.

I do have a little question.  JQK seemed to want to run with the trafficking story.  I just wonder if that is to bring the case to a level of international involvement.  This could permit an international investigation.  The investigation may come to the conclusion that there was no trafficking and the remains were hidden in a cage.  Is it important to "believe" in a bigger theory to legally involve more than internet posters and hidey hole sleuths??

That is precisely my take on it, Buckeye.

Hmmmmmm

I do believe a blond American girl, targeted for trafficking, requires investigating.  There are a lot of young, blond Americans traveling.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #787 12/24/08 -
Post by: Buckeye on December 31, 2008, 10:20:58 AM
I tried to pay attention to Caps because Klaas vouched for who he was...not what he said...

Once the boolean math equations hit the boards, I really thought my time could be better spent elsewhere.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #787 12/24/08 -
Post by: klaasend on December 31, 2008, 10:25:50 AM
I'm waiting for answer's but think i'll be waiting for a long time!This is for either ldstlou or Hotshot.Please explain to everyone who is not in the know as to why we shouldn't belive Kermit???I'll wait your answer...TIA
MumInOhio seems to have issues with Kermit also. I'd be interested in her take on why we should not believe Kermit...
I stand with the frog...
ps..i thought there was room for CAPS version being the "what happened to Natalee" and Kermit's version "on where Natalee ended up".
With all the Kermit bashing from a few, who incidentally offer not any backup, and the silence from Kyle and CAPS, "I'm inclined to believe" those attacking Kermit have a different agenda wrt Justice for Natalee....
IT IS ALL ABOUT GETTING NATALEE HOME after 3 + years! Justice will come, in this life or the next for the preps.
Itis all about getting Natalee back.  Not making something out  of nothing like kermit has done. She knows damn well it was upto others to get all information to  the FBI, and Kyles job did not include that....Silvetti was the head of this ship,  and what ever he has done, ishim.  Hedid go back to aruba,  why???  to search the pond again.  Not  to  strike up a deal with a pipeline.  Either you are with the Holloways or not, and when  you talk the  persistance down,  you are talking down about the holloways.... That is a back stabbing to them. No-one knows more then  us what they were  up against in aruba, more then we do.  i dont  think they were briefed to the fullest as to who to trust, or anything like that.  obviously silvetti was overtaken  by  the arubans.  I never said that kermit was all wrong, she just isn't all correct, and is taking some things out of context to suit her purpose.

I am not a drive by.  I work long hours now, I read in the morning when i wake up, go to work, get paid, come home, work again, eat, read again,  then  go to sleep an hour later.   dont  be calling me a driveby... once again, talking before you know the answers..

Sound like *******?  Well at least i sound like someone who is doing something, and not taking stuff from someone that is only trying to start trouble....so I take that as a compliment. 

I am sure I'll be banned next because  I dont  think like the majority here,so be it... So before i go to work, to all those who care, have a safe holiday, and a good new year...

No Klaas my other post was not a threat....

Again, sounds just like people that want to get banned.  No, I'm not going to ban you.  People get banned mostly because they act like a**holes.  Act like an a**hole and you will get banned, bottom line.  ******* and Destiny both acted like a**holes.  We don't need that here. 


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #787 12/24/08 -
Post by: klaasend on December 31, 2008, 10:28:26 AM
I tried to pay attention to Caps because Klaas vouched for who he was...not what he said...

Once the boolean math equations hit the boards, I really thought my time could be better spent elsewhere.

And I'm trying to figure out right now if I was conned.  I would not be the first time in this case.  I would still like to believe that Caps is one of the good guys but there are some things he has said that make me wonder.  Like Finngirl pointed out, Caps tried to tell us the intials for names are read last name first (not true). 


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #787 12/24/08 -
Post by: RoxiBalboa on December 31, 2008, 10:30:35 AM
Happy New Year's Monkeys

Just spent 2 hours getting caught up. Thanks Jen, Wingnut and Kermit! Anxiously awaiting Kermit's every word today.


((((Klaas)))))
I felt you deserved a hug, just cuz
You're karma is a beautiful thing, for some others, karma's a bitch

I tend to agree this started a simple, possibly accidental crime and spun out of control into a horrendous murder coverup. I just wonder how many people are kicking themselves for ever helping in that coverup. You know, its never too late to do the right thing, never too late.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #787 12/24/08 -
Post by: MuffyBee on December 31, 2008, 10:53:58 AM
PM Klaas.
Good morning Monkeys. 


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #787 12/24/08 -
Post by: truthseeker2 on December 31, 2008, 10:57:35 AM
Does anyone ever get up, walk from their computer, and bang their head against the wall? Sometimes I can't seem to wrap my brain around what is fact and what is fiction.

daily, sometimes hourly

Was this:
...a contrived plot, full of of drugs, porn videos, secret Lion's Dens, full of Elders, with a subplot of Columbian and Venezuelan druglords, high powered speedboats, casino mobsters. Sprinkle in (various) ponds, chocolate, ants, lighthouses, rock painting crews, Hitler references, mysterious witnesses, etc...

OR

...a group of locals, who spiked a girls drink (as probably done before to "last night" female tourists) seeking to have fun with a disadvantaged and unsuspecting girl. After (unexpected) accidental death, panick ensued and the father (who is known to be trained in the legal profession and has contacts) for advice. Rather than be faced with the negative stigma and bad publicity, a decision was made to dispose of, rather than report, the death. Due to the size and population of the island, and for fear of a black eye to a tourism industry, which masks other money related washing machine industries, close friends (who held prominent positions) went to work and sabotaged the investigation in an attempt to make it simply "go away." When international media descended, and because of lack of experience, they became defensive. Everyone clammed up. Strategies were put in place by high-powered minds to distract, disinform, and disrupt the heat. To this day, they continue to stick to their guns, never giving in to pressure and implications that a cover-up happened.

Is it simple or is it complicated? Ever wonder?

a combination of both?

the locale and the careers of some players
complicated an otherwise simple scenario?

locale: corrupt/steamy resort
careers: atty/PvdS and polis/vdStraten

the locale provided the petri dish
and the careers provided the bacteria

the scenario could have been smaller
if the persons involved were blue collar
and the locale didn't involve tourists/casinos/etc

shango's basic story is very simple
when you strip away the elaborate imagery




yes, finngirl.  I see your logic and tend to agree.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #787 12/24/08 -
Post by: johan555 on December 31, 2008, 11:16:40 AM
I have calculated that the skull in the cage is about 4.5 inches (11.4 cm) long.
That seems to me very small for a skull.

The average Skull Length of a human is 8.45 inches (21.5cm).


Yes i did the same (if it is a skull it is a very small one ) 4 inches
(10 cm )

+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++

I asked a Dive company in Rotterdam if the pics (if' send the pics to them ) were taken with a ROV and what he thinks about the content of the cage .
i spoke with the Owner of the dive company (they work daily (worldwide)with the ROV) and hey said to me that it is certainly not a human body.

Dear Johan,



The images were created with a R.O.V. The images were taken at around 91 f. That means 91 feet approximately 30 meters water depth.

The white stain bottom of the cage is very likely that sand by the weight of the cage through the mesh (net) is pressed. Because the cage at the bottom state.

Photo 2 is a photograph of a t.v. screen on which to see how the R.O.V. about 3 meters above the cage hangs (81 f) right we see the manipulator of the ROV in the picture .. The manipulator is a kind of movable and rotating grasping forceps.

Other photos are the same only what is here played with contrast and color. The objects in the cage are in my view hermit crabs. Hermit crabs have a shell to protect. When they bigger, the shell left, and they go looking for another shell.

A second possibility is that during the submersible of the cage, the cage was rotated 180 º and the bait top of the cage is hung (in order to lure crabs) now on the ground seems to lie. The bait is suspended with a piece of steel wire and a weight to the well to hang. This weight may be anything but what is on a crab boat.

The cage itself is heavily vegetated that is to say that it is already at least half years in the water must have been. Cages are used time and time again, and look not so overgrown off.



I am assuming here that you can continue.





Best regards,



DIVE & COMPANY MAAS Waal
Rotterdam


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #787 12/24/08 -
Post by: ldstlou on December 31, 2008, 11:24:59 AM
I have calculated that the skull in the cage is about 4.5 inches (11.4 cm) long.
That seems to me very small for a skull.

The average Skull Length of a human is 8.45 inches (21.5cm).


Yes i did the same (if it is a skull it is a very small one ) 4 inches
(10 cm )

+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++

I asked a Dive company in Rotterdam if the pics (if' send the pics to them ) were taken with a ROV and what he thinks about the content of the cage .
i spoke with the Owner of the dive company (they work daily (worldwide)with the ROV) and hey said to me that it is certainly not a human body.

Dear Johan,



The images were created with a R.O.V. The images were taken at around 91 f. That means 91 feet approximately 30 meters water depth.

The white stain bottom of the cage is very likely that sand by the weight of the cage through the mesh (net) is pressed. Because the cage at the bottom state.

Photo 2 is a photograph of a t.v. screen on which to see how the R.O.V. about 3 meters above the cage hangs (81 f) right we see the manipulator of the ROV in the picture .. The manipulator is a kind of movable and rotating grasping forceps.

Other photos are the same only what is here played with contrast and color. The objects in the cage are in my view hermit crabs. Hermit crabs have a shell to protect. When they bigger, the shell left, and they go looking for another shell.

A second possibility is that during the submersible of the cage, the cage was rotated 180 º and the bait top of the cage is hung (in order to lure crabs) now on the ground seems to lie. The bait is suspended with a piece of steel wire and a weight to the well to hang. This weight may be anything but what is on a crab boat.

The cage itself is heavily vegetated that is to say that it is already at least half years in the water must have been. Cages are used time and time again, and look not so overgrown off.



I am assuming here that you can continue.





Best regards,



DIVE & COMPANY MAAS Waal
Rotterdam

Thanks Johan. So if there were no bones is it safe to say Kermit is wrong in her "conspiracy theory". John Silvetti didn't plant any evidence in the pond, and Lalas did not conspire with me to promote the conspiracy?


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #787 12/24/08 -
Post by: Ree on December 31, 2008, 11:28:35 AM
Maybe not as far as that's concerned, but certainly Kyle/responsible party did not turn over evidence to the family/FBI in a timely manner so there was a coverup exposed.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #787 12/24/08 -
Post by: johan555 on December 31, 2008, 11:30:38 AM
I have calculated that the skull in the cage is about 4.5 inches (11.4 cm) long.
That seems to me very small for a skull.

The average Skull Length of a human is 8.45 inches (21.5cm).


Yes i did the same (if it is a skull it is a very small one ) 4 inches
(10 cm )

+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++

I asked a Dive company in Rotterdam if the pics (if' send the pics to them ) were taken with a ROV and what he thinks about the content of the cage .
i spoke with the Owner of the dive company (they work daily (worldwide)with the ROV) and hey said to me that it is certainly not a human body.

Dear Johan,



The images were created with a R.O.V. The images were taken at around 91 f. That means 91 feet approximately 30 meters water depth.

The white stain bottom of the cage is very likely that sand by the weight of the cage through the mesh (net) is pressed. Because the cage at the bottom state.

Photo 2 is a photograph of a t.v. screen on which to see how the R.O.V. about 3 meters above the cage hangs (81 f) right we see the manipulator of the ROV in the picture .. The manipulator is a kind of movable and rotating grasping forceps.

Other photos are the same only what is here played with contrast and color. The objects in the cage are in my view hermit crabs. Hermit crabs have a shell to protect. When they bigger, the shell left, and they go looking for another shell.

A second possibility is that during the submersible of the cage, the cage was rotated 180 º and the bait top of the cage is hung (in order to lure crabs) now on the ground seems to lie. The bait is suspended with a piece of steel wire and a weight to the well to hang. This weight may be anything but what is on a crab boat.

The cage itself is heavily vegetated that is to say that it is already at least half years in the water must have been. Cages are used time and time again, and look not so overgrown off.



I am assuming here that you can continue.





Best regards,



DIVE & COMPANY MAAS Waal
Rotterdam

Thanks Johan. So if there were no bones is it safe to say Kermit is wrong in her "conspiracy theory". John Silvetti didn't plant any evidence in the pond, and Lalas did not conspire with me to promote the conspiracy?

DIVE & COMPANY Maas &  Waal
Is a dive compagny in Rotterdam and they work daily with several ROV's
I phoned them a few  times and they analyzed the pics with several persons there .
This is what they say about the pics .



Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #787 12/24/08 -
Post by: pinkbanana on December 31, 2008, 11:32:23 AM
Good Day Monkeys

Wanted to wish everyone a SAFE and Happy New Year!!  ::MonkeyDance::

pbxo


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #787 12/24/08 -
Post by: klaasend on December 31, 2008, 11:35:38 AM
ldstlou - I have no idea if anyone conspired with anyone.  I do find Kyle's posts at Freebirds WRONG and the fact they didn't send the FBI and the family evidence KYLE thought might be human remains when they said they would was WRONG of Kyle and wrong of Silvetti.

Note that I'm leaving Capslock out of this because one issue has nothing to do with the other in this instance.  I'm simply talking about what Kyle and Silvetti failed to do based upon Kyle's own words.  Whether Kyle thought he was speaking in a private forum or not doesn't matter to me at this point, they are his words.  He is welcome to refute or rebutt those words at any time right here in the OPEN SM forum. 


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #787 12/24/08 -
Post by: snoopy on December 31, 2008, 11:46:16 AM
Need to run out for a while this morning. Once I return, I will be here for the duration of the day/evening/night. Later.........   ::MonkeyCool::
Thank God, because I'm real sick and going to the Dr's at 10:00 and will be in bed for the rest of the day. Eyes hurt too , so it's hard to read. Sorry Guys I'm not much help this week.

Hope you feel better soon Blonde.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #787 12/24/08 -
Post by: ldstlou on December 31, 2008, 11:46:25 AM
ldstlou - I have no idea if anyone conspired with anyone.  I do find Kyle's posts at Freebirds WRONG and the fact they didn't send the FBI and the family evidence KYLE thought might be human remains when they said they would was WRONG of Kyle and wrong of Silvetti.

Note that I'm leaving Capslock out of this because one issue has nothing to do with the other in this instance.  I'm simply talking about what Kyle and Silvetti failed to do based upon Kyle's own words.  Whether Kyle thought he was speaking in a private forum or not doesn't matter to me at this point, they are his words.  He is welcome to refute or rebutt those words at any time right here in the OPEN SM forum. 

why would he come here Klaas? he has told me via phone calls and e-mail he turned everything over to the FBI right away and told Jug the same in an e-mail. Jug told me when I asked and re-asked based on Monkey's questions if they received the photos and he said yes. Still no one believes him. Jug stated twice they don't believe Kyle or John were involved in a conspiracy, and still you don't believe him. Coming here would only allow bashing because minds are made up. What is the point?

If there was no evidence in the cage...ie bones, then logically there was no conspiracy to cover up the evidence.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #787 12/24/08 -
Post by: Buckeye on December 31, 2008, 11:51:38 AM
ldstlou - I have no idea if anyone conspired with anyone.  I do find Kyle's posts at Freebirds WRONG and the fact they didn't send the FBI and the family evidence KYLE thought might be human remains when they said they would was WRONG of Kyle and wrong of Silvetti.

Note that I'm leaving Capslock out of this because one issue has nothing to do with the other in this instance.  I'm simply talking about what Kyle and Silvetti failed to do based upon Kyle's own words.  Whether Kyle thought he was speaking in a private forum or not doesn't matter to me at this point, they are his words.  He is welcome to refute or rebutt those words at any time right here in the OPEN SM forum. 

why would he come here Klaas? he has told me via phone calls and e-mail he turned everything over to the FBI right away and told Jug the same in an e-mail. Jug told me when I asked and re-asked based on Monkey's questions if they received the photos and he said yes. Still no one believes him. Jug stated twice they don't believe Kyle or John were involved in a conspiracy, and still you don't believe him. Coming here would only allow bashing because minds are made up. What is the point?

If there was no evidence in the cage...ie bones, then logically there was no conspiracy to cover up the evidence.

OE (Kyle) is the one that said he thought there were remains...and did an overlay...Someone else may think otherwise...but Kyle's belief is that there were remains.  Did he act appropriately on his belief?  These are Kyle's words.  Once again, your focus is on the messenger.  Try to focus on the message, itself.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #787 12/24/08 -
Post by: wingnut on December 31, 2008, 11:51:53 AM
Two points:

1) Kyle repeatedly referred to the cage contents as "human remains".  Over and over and over.  I believe that he was trained to know what he was looking at.

2) I think most, if not all, here would agree that Aruba spent much money, time and effort to cover up the death of an American tourist.  I do not put anything past them as far as attempting to clean it up and minimize future damage to their tourism/economy - even moving evidence if necessary.  And THEY are the ones who have custody/control of the trap contents!

Do you really believe that they collected and placed HERMIT CRAB SHELLS in those plastic bags?  Sheesh.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #787 12/24/08 -
Post by: truthseeker2 on December 31, 2008, 11:55:18 AM



That could be.  It's just hard to tell from this pic.  I still want to know why no one, even Tim Miller and Dateline, did not question the thumbs down if this image was taken 60 seconds after that thumbs down.  I think that is one of the reasons why I have been skeptical about what we are seeing with that pic.

This may have already been answered (I'm just trying to catch up with the thread) Kyle stated two things about that "thumbs down" indication by Tim Trahan.

1 - There was no pre-determined signal for an uncertain sighting

2 - A large skate had swum by right before that, disturbed the silt from the ocean floor, and affected visibility.

Tim Miller - well, he told Dateline (after he had been booted from the boat) that it looks like a skull - still looks like a skull.

Looks like a skull and is a skull are not the same thing.  Tim Miller is a hero and I respect him in everyway.  But, from a logical stand point I still am not certain that was a skull in that trap.  Maybe it was...but the information available today does not validate that.

Still to the point, no one appears to have openly questioned the thumbs down at 15:40 on 12/30/07 when the image we are seeing would have been on the monitor.  Why?  (The Why? is rhetorical for this forum.  I know we weren't there so the answer to that would not be available)  We have all kinds of people looking at that image saying "That's a skull".  Yet no one looking at the monitor ever seems to say "Hey, what do mean thumbs down?  I see a skull or something that looks like a skull right there in front of your faces!  Why the thumbs down?"  Is there any evidence that anyone did or said anything like that at 15:40 on 12/30/07?  If so, I have not seen or heard it.  And that is one reason why I have not completely committed to idea that a skull was recovered from that trap.

Sorry if this sounds disrespectful.  I do not mean it that way.  I just don't know any other way to state my opinion on this.  ::MonkeyCool::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #787 12/24/08 -
Post by: klaasend on December 31, 2008, 11:55:21 AM
ldstlou - I have no idea if anyone conspired with anyone.  I do find Kyle's posts at Freebirds WRONG and the fact they didn't send the FBI and the family evidence KYLE thought might be human remains when they said they would was WRONG of Kyle and wrong of Silvetti.

Note that I'm leaving Capslock out of this because one issue has nothing to do with the other in this instance.  I'm simply talking about what Kyle and Silvetti failed to do based upon Kyle's own words.  Whether Kyle thought he was speaking in a private forum or not doesn't matter to me at this point, they are his words.  He is welcome to refute or rebutt those words at any time right here in the OPEN SM forum. 

why would he come here Klaas? he has told me via phone calls and e-mail he turned everything over to the FBI right away and told Jug the same in an e-mail. Jug told me when I asked and re-asked based on Monkey's questions if they received the photos and he said yes. Still no one believes him. Jug stated twice they don't believe Kyle or John were involved in a conspiracy, and still you don't believe him. Coming here would only allow bashing because minds are made up. What is the point?

If there was no evidence in the cage...ie bones, then logically there was no conspiracy to cover up the evidence.

I'm getting a little tired of the "hit and runs".

1.  WHEN did Jug and BETH get ALL of the photos and information?
2.  Jug doesn't believe that Kyle and John were involved in a conspiracy but Jug could be wrong.  I couldn't believe that Dave Holloway could be friends with MIP6 or that Robin would be posting along side with people that have said the most horrible things about Beth and Dave either. 
3.  KYLE himself, in his own words and by superimposing Natalee's photo in the cage DID think there were human remains in the cage.  Tim Miller did think there were human remains in the cage.  Kyle and Tim could be wrong but did KYLE or Silvetti notify the FBI and the family in a timely manner or did they sit on what they thought they had?


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #787 12/24/08 -
Post by: wingnut on December 31, 2008, 11:56:25 AM


why would he come here Klaas? he has told me via phone calls and e-mail he turned everything over to the FBI right away and told Jug the same in an e-mail. Jug told me when I asked and re-asked based on Monkey's questions if they received the photos and he said yes. Still no one believes him. Jug stated twice they don't believe Kyle or John were involved in a conspiracy, and still you don't believe him. Coming here would only allow bashing because minds are made up. What is the point?

If there was no evidence in the cage...ie bones, then logically there was no conspiracy to cover up the evidence.


WHEN did he receive the photos?

FROM WHOM did he receive them?

Unanswered questions.  We KNOW Jug got them.  We also KNOW it wasn't Kyle who sent them.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #787 12/24/08 -
Post by: truthseeker2 on December 31, 2008, 11:57:07 AM
Need to run out for a while this morning. Once I return, I will be here for the duration of the day/evening/night. Later.........   ::MonkeyCool::
Thank God, because I'm real sick and going to the Dr's at 10:00 and will be in bed for the rest of the day. Eyes hurt too , so it's hard to read. Sorry Guys I'm not much help this week.

I hope you feel better soon!!!


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #787 12/24/08 -
Post by: ldstlou on December 31, 2008, 11:59:46 AM
ldstlou - I have no idea if anyone conspired with anyone.  I do find Kyle's posts at Freebirds WRONG and the fact they didn't send the FBI and the family evidence KYLE thought might be human remains when they said they would was WRONG of Kyle and wrong of Silvetti.

Note that I'm leaving Capslock out of this because one issue has nothing to do with the other in this instance.  I'm simply talking about what Kyle and Silvetti failed to do based upon Kyle's own words.  Whether Kyle thought he was speaking in a private forum or not doesn't matter to me at this point, they are his words.  He is welcome to refute or rebutt those words at any time right here in the OPEN SM forum. 

why would he come here Klaas? he has told me via phone calls and e-mail he turned everything over to the FBI right away and told Jug the same in an e-mail. Jug told me when I asked and re-asked based on Monkey's questions if they received the photos and he said yes. Still no one believes him. Jug stated twice they don't believe Kyle or John were involved in a conspiracy, and still you don't believe him. Coming here would only allow bashing because minds are made up. What is the point?

If there was no evidence in the cage...ie bones, then logically there was no conspiracy to cover up the evidence.

I'm getting a little tired of the "hit and runs".

1.  WHEN did Jug and BETH get ALL of the photos and information?
2.  Jug doesn't believe that Kyle and John were involved in a conspiracy but Jug could be wrong.  I couldn't believe that Dave Holloway could be friends with MIP6 or that Robin would be posting along side with people that have said the most horrible things about Beth and Dave either. 
3.  KYLE himself, in his own words and by superimposing Natalee's photo in the cage DID think there were human remains in the cage.  Tim Miller did think there were human remains in the cage.  Kyle and Tim could be wrong but did KYLE or Silvetti notify the FBI and the family in a timely manner or did they sit on what they thought they had?

at the urging of Snoopy I got on here one evening and answered all of these questions. I am not going to do it again and again...what is the point?
And as far as Jug being wrong, I choose Jug's opinion over Kermit, just who I respect and believe more. He has every post she made, I copied and pasted them to him, hasn't changed his opinion.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #787 12/24/08 -
Post by: klaasend on December 31, 2008, 12:03:01 PM
ldstlou - I have no idea if anyone conspired with anyone.  I do find Kyle's posts at Freebirds WRONG and the fact they didn't send the FBI and the family evidence KYLE thought might be human remains when they said they would was WRONG of Kyle and wrong of Silvetti.

Note that I'm leaving Capslock out of this because one issue has nothing to do with the other in this instance.  I'm simply talking about what Kyle and Silvetti failed to do based upon Kyle's own words.  Whether Kyle thought he was speaking in a private forum or not doesn't matter to me at this point, they are his words.  He is welcome to refute or rebutt those words at any time right here in the OPEN SM forum. 

why would he come here Klaas? he has told me via phone calls and e-mail he turned everything over to the FBI right away and told Jug the same in an e-mail. Jug told me when I asked and re-asked based on Monkey's questions if they received the photos and he said yes. Still no one believes him. Jug stated twice they don't believe Kyle or John were involved in a conspiracy, and still you don't believe him. Coming here would only allow bashing because minds are made up. What is the point?

If there was no evidence in the cage...ie bones, then logically there was no conspiracy to cover up the evidence.

I'm getting a little tired of the "hit and runs".

1.  WHEN did Jug and BETH get ALL of the photos and information?
2.  Jug doesn't believe that Kyle and John were involved in a conspiracy but Jug could be wrong.  I couldn't believe that Dave Holloway could be friends with MIP6 or that Robin would be posting along side with people that have said the most horrible things about Beth and Dave either. 
3.  KYLE himself, in his own words and by superimposing Natalee's photo in the cage DID think there were human remains in the cage.  Tim Miller did think there were human remains in the cage.  Kyle and Tim could be wrong but did KYLE or Silvetti notify the FBI and the family in a timely manner or did they sit on what they thought they had?

at the urging of Snoopy I got on here one evening and answered all of these questions. I am not going to do it again and again...what is the point?
And as far as Jug being wrong, I choose Jug's opinion over Kermit, just who I respect and believe more. He has every post she made, I copied and pasted them to him, hasn't changed his opinion.

You answered WHEN Jug got the photos?  Do you remember what day or do I have to search all of your posts.  It's not a matter of trusting Jug over Kermit, of course you would trust Jug.  It's a matter of people fooling Jug, Beth, Dave and Robin.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #787 12/24/08 -
Post by: SunnyinTX on December 31, 2008, 12:04:30 PM
I don't post on the Natalee thread anymore because I do not feel I have anything to offer....however I do read and try to keep up, except for the past month or so... this morning I had  time to get caught up and now I wish I didn't.  I think I know why many of us no longer post here. MY GOD!  I have never seen monkeys at each others throat like this. I don't give a damn who you are...or how close you feel you are to 'the family' if you think the family is going to tell you everything...get REAL!!  You post on a public forum...........the family is not stupid. I am really sickened to read a lot of what is on here.....just because someone, 'in the know' tells you something doesn't mean it is TRUE or factual. I am not taking sides with anyone...........but I sure wish some of you would step back....go back and read what you write..............when I read a post that starts out with 'you people' I immediately think Oh F..here we go again!!!  OK...back to lurking........Happy New Year to everyone. Klaas  and Mods...Bless your hearts


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #787 12/24/08 -
Post by: ldstlou on December 31, 2008, 12:06:07 PM
ldstlou - I have no idea if anyone conspired with anyone.  I do find Kyle's posts at Freebirds WRONG and the fact they didn't send the FBI and the family evidence KYLE thought might be human remains when they said they would was WRONG of Kyle and wrong of Silvetti.

Note that I'm leaving Capslock out of this because one issue has nothing to do with the other in this instance.  I'm simply talking about what Kyle and Silvetti failed to do based upon Kyle's own words.  Whether Kyle thought he was speaking in a private forum or not doesn't matter to me at this point, they are his words.  He is welcome to refute or rebutt those words at any time right here in the OPEN SM forum. 

why would he come here Klaas? he has told me via phone calls and e-mail he turned everything over to the FBI right away and told Jug the same in an e-mail. Jug told me when I asked and re-asked based on Monkey's questions if they received the photos and he said yes. Still no one believes him. Jug stated twice they don't believe Kyle or John were involved in a conspiracy, and still you don't believe him. Coming here would only allow bashing because minds are made up. What is the point?

If there was no evidence in the cage...ie bones, then logically there was no conspiracy to cover up the evidence.

I'm getting a little tired of the "hit and runs".

1.  WHEN did Jug and BETH get ALL of the photos and information?
2.  Jug doesn't believe that Kyle and John were involved in a conspiracy but Jug could be wrong.  I couldn't believe that Dave Holloway could be friends with MIP6 or that Robin would be posting along side with people that have said the most horrible things about Beth and Dave either. 
3.  KYLE himself, in his own words and by superimposing Natalee's photo in the cage DID think there were human remains in the cage.  Tim Miller did think there were human remains in the cage.  Kyle and Tim could be wrong but did KYLE or Silvetti notify the FBI and the family in a timely manner or did they sit on what they thought they had?

at the urging of Snoopy I got on here one evening and answered all of these questions. I am not going to do it again and again...what is the point?
And as far as Jug being wrong, I choose Jug's opinion over Kermit, just who I respect and believe more. He has every post she made, I copied and pasted them to him, hasn't changed his opinion.

You answered WHEN Jug got the photos?  Do you remember what day or do I have to search all of your posts.  It's not a matter of trusting Jug over Kermit, of course you would trust Jug.  It's a matter of people fooling Jug, Beth, Dave and Robin.

well like I said, I have copied and posted to Jug all of Kermits "evidence" and it hasn't changed his opinion, so I am assuming he does not feel he was duped my Kyle or the members of the persistence.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #787 12/24/08 -
Post by: Tamikosmom on December 31, 2008, 12:07:02 PM

Unless Caps comes on SM and responds to the posts that questions his/her motives, I'll tend to believe the posts can not be countered by Caps....Same as I believe Kyle won't come back to counter posts negative to him.

I wanted to believe Caps...but without hearing from him and with what Kermit has posted. I lean towards Caps being a diversion, whether intentional or not (he may have been led unwillingly-I don't know).

I just can't buy into the reasoning put forth by some that Caps/kyle won't post again on SM because they somehow feel that they have been wronged ::MonkeyEek:: We are here to search for Justice for Natalee....I say to Caps/Kyle.... defend your positions or be regarded as untrustworthy....what do you have to hide if you have truth on your side? I want to believe...give me reasons to believe...others trying to defend you just don't cut it with me...



From the getgo I was not a believer in CAPS.

At the beginning of July ... I left the Natalee Holloway forum for five months.

My belief that CAPS cryptic posts were a distraction from the truth and ... my heartfelt concern regarding the Persistence/ALE connection ... met with a lot of opposition.

I was a lonely Monkey.

Inconsistencies posted by Kyle regarding the Persistence undertaking were justified.  Changing theories and flawed research posted by CAPS were justified.

Hey ... Tamikosmom's theories are constantly changing.  Tamikosmom's research is often flawed.  However ... Tamikosmom does not claim to be in the know.  She concedes that she is just speculating on info that is out there.  However ... CAPS was revered who knew and ... the truth would be revealed if his cryptic words could interpretated.

During that four of that five month period ... I took a "complete" sabatical from the SM Site.  When time permitted out of a busy summer ... following the Touch DNA vindication of John and Patsy Ramsey ... I joined a Jonbenet forum on the TOPIX site.

I returned to Scared Monkeys in the fall and ... joined the discussion on the Caylee Marie thread.  However ... when the latest ROV images exposed and ... Kyle's posts submitted to another forum emerged ... I felt somewhat vidicated ... in regards to the Persistence issue and ... the CAPS connection soooo ... I tippy toed back to the Natalee Holloway thread..

If CAPS is the bearer of the truth ... he should just spit it out ... forget the elusive clues.  If CAPS is the bearer of the truth ... justice for Natalee Holloway dictates that the FBI/John Q. Kelly/family of Natalee Holloway should be made aware of the truth in plain English which I know he grasps perfectly (another deception) ... not cryptic messages.

IMO

Janet


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #787 12/24/08 -
Post by: snoopy on December 31, 2008, 12:07:12 PM
Ldstlou I believe you are being mis-lead.  I'm not going to be drug into this again, and my credibility shot to hell.  I never received complete answers to my questions.  Did it ever occur to you that Jug was not being told the truth?  Did it ever occur to you that Kyle was not being truthful to you?

I'm sorry, but I don't believe what you are being told.  It's false information.  JMO



Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #787 12/24/08 -
Post by: texasmom on December 31, 2008, 12:07:36 PM
I don't post on the Natalee thread anymore because I do not feel I have anything to offer....however I do read and try to keep up, except for the past month or so... this morning I had  time to get caught up and now I wish I didn't.  I think I know why many of us no longer post here. MY GOD!  I have never seen monkeys at each others throat like this. I don't give a damn who you are...or how close you feel you are to 'the family' if you think the family is going to tell you everything...get REAL!!  You post on a public forum...........the family is not stupid. I am really sickened to read a lot of what is on here.....just because someone, 'in the know' tells you something doesn't mean it is TRUE or factual. I am not taking sides with anyone...........but I sure wish some of you would step back....go back and read what you write..............when I read a post that starts out with 'you people' I immediately think Oh F..here we go again!!!  OK...back to lurking........Happy New Year to everyone. Klaas  and Mods...Bless your hearts

Thanks SunnyinTx!   ::MonkeyCool::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #787 12/24/08 -
Post by: truthseeker2 on December 31, 2008, 12:08:36 PM
Buckeye - I admire and respect the way your mind works.

Remember, Freebirds always said "You Decide".

What is the truth?  Take the facts as we know them, remove emotion, feelings, and sometimes friendships as well - and just look at the facts.

What do the facts tell you is the truth?  You Decide.

I do have a little question.  JQK seemed to want to run with the trafficking story.  I just wonder if that is to bring the case to a level of international involvement.  This could permit an international investigation.  The investigation may come to the conclusion that there was no trafficking and the remains were hidden in a cage.  Is it important to "believe" in a bigger theory to legally involve more than internet posters and hidey hole sleuths??

I wondered the exact same thing when JQK was talking to Greta.  I even posted questions about it here at SM...but not many were interested in discussing it at that time.  If JQK can move this story or theory, I think it could get more international attention and put more pressure on Aruba to get to the truth.  At the very worst it could put a spotlight on this huge problem even if the truth about Natalee does not surface.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #787 12/24/08 -
Post by: ldstlou on December 31, 2008, 12:08:36 PM
I don't post on the Natalee thread anymore because I do not feel I have anything to offer....however I do read and try to keep up, except for the past month or so... this morning I had  time to get caught up and now I wish I didn't.  I think I know why many of us no longer post here. MY GOD!  I have never seen monkeys at each others throat like this. I don't give a damn who you are...or how close you feel you are to 'the family' if you think the family is going to tell you everything...get REAL!!  You post on a public forum...........the family is not stupid. I am really sickened to read a lot of what is on here.....just because someone, 'in the know' tells you something doesn't mean it is TRUE or factual. I am not taking sides with anyone...........but I sure wish some of you would step back....go back and read what you write..............when I read a post that starts out with 'you people' I immediately think Oh F..here we go again!!!  OK...back to lurking........Happy New Year to everyone. Klaas  and Mods...Bless your hearts

I take it that was directed at me. I am surprised that you don't have a problem with the conspiracy theory Kermit has come up with. Lives are disrupted and careers and relationships are being destoyed and thats ok?


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #787 12/24/08 -
Post by: snoopy on December 31, 2008, 12:09:53 PM
I don't post on the Natalee thread anymore because I do not feel I have anything to offer....however I do read and try to keep up, except for the past month or so... this morning I had  time to get caught up and now I wish I didn't.  I think I know why many of us no longer post here. MY GOD!  I have never seen monkeys at each others throat like this. I don't give a damn who you are...or how close you feel you are to 'the family' if you think the family is going to tell you everything...get REAL!!  You post on a public forum...........the family is not stupid. I am really sickened to read a lot of what is on here.....just because someone, 'in the know' tells you something doesn't mean it is TRUE or factual. I am not taking sides with anyone...........but I sure wish some of you would step back....go back and read what you write..............when I read a post that starts out with 'you people' I immediately think Oh F..here we go again!!!  OK...back to lurking........Happy New Year to everyone. Klaas  and Mods...Bless your hearts

Howdy Sunny........the voice of reason.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #787 12/24/08 -
Post by: jen3560 on December 31, 2008, 12:10:15 PM

Looks like a skull and is a skull are not the same thing.  Tim Miller is a hero and I respect him in everyway.  But, from a logical stand point I still am not certain that was a skull in that trap.  Maybe it was...but the information available today does not validate that.

Still to the point, no one appears to have openly questioned the thumbs down at 15:40 on 12/30/07 when the image we are seeing would have been on the monitor.  Why?  (The Why? is rhetorical for this forum.  I know we weren't there so the answer to that would not be available)  We have all kinds of people looking at that image saying "That's a skull".  Yet no one looking at the monitor ever seems to say "Hey, what do mean thumbs down?  I see a skull or something that looks like a skull right there in front of your faces!  Why the thumbs down?"  Is there any evidence that anyone did or said anything like that at 15:40 on 12/30/07?  If so, I have not seen or heard it.  And that is one reason why I have not completely committed to idea that a skull was recovered from that trap.

Sorry if this sounds disrespectful.  I do not mean it that way.  I just don't know any other way to state my opinion on this.  ::MonkeyCool::

It didn't sound disrespectful at all to me.

Tim Miller was removed from the Persistence on Dec 30th by John Silvetti.  While Kyle did not go into great detail with us over the reason WHY, he did say it was because John felt Tim had become a liability - and because John and Tim had a disagreement.

When I personally pressed Kyle on the issue of the disagreement between John and Tim - I asked him if it was because Tim Miller shared the same view that Kyle does - that those were human remains in the trap.  Kyle said YES.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #787 12/24/08 -
Post by: johan555 on December 31, 2008, 12:10:49 PM
I have calculated that the skull in the cage is about 4.5 inches (11.4 cm) long.
That seems to me very small for a skull.

The average Skull Length of a human is 8.45 inches (21.5cm).


Yes i did the same (if it is a skull it is a very small one ) 4 inches
(10 cm )

+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++

I asked a Dive company in Rotterdam if the pics (if' send the pics to them ) were taken with a ROV and what he thinks about the content of the cage .
i spoke with the Owner of the dive company (they work daily (worldwide)with the ROV) and hey said to me that it is certainly not a human body.

Dear Johan,



The images were created with a R.O.V. The images were taken at around 91 f. That means 91 feet approximately 30 meters water depth.

The white stain bottom of the cage is very likely that sand by the weight of the cage through the mesh (net) is pressed. Because the cage at the bottom state.

Photo 2 is a photograph of a t.v. screen on which to see how the R.O.V. about 3 meters above the cage hangs (81 f) right we see the manipulator of the ROV in the picture .. The manipulator is a kind of movable and rotating grasping forceps.

Other photos are the same only what is here played with contrast and color. The objects in the cage are in my view hermit crabs. Hermit crabs have a shell to protect. When they bigger, the shell left, and they go looking for another shell.

A second possibility is that during the submersible of the cage, the cage was rotated 180 º and the bait top of the cage is hung (in order to lure crabs) now on the ground seems to lie. The bait is suspended with a piece of steel wire and a weight to the well to hang. This weight may be anything but what is on a crab boat.

The cage itself is heavily vegetated that is to say that it is already at least half years in the water must have been. Cages are used time and time again, and look not so overgrown off.



I am assuming here that you can continue.





Best regards,



DIVE & COMPANY MAAS Waal
Rotterdam

Thanks Johan. So if there were no bones is it safe to say Kermit is wrong in her "conspiracy theory". John Silvetti didn't plant any evidence in the pond, and Lalas did not conspire with me to promote the conspiracy?

DIVE & COMPANY Maas &  Waal
Is a dive compagny in Rotterdam and they work daily with several ROV's
I phoned them a few  times and they analyzed the pics with several persons there .
This is what they say about the pics .



DIVE & COMPANY & Maas Waal  said also  to me:
When we are somewhere and we use the   ROV and we "See"
human remains,we stay at that location till  the remains are contained.
If necessary, we stay a week or more at 1 location !!
We monitor what we have found but do not go away.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #787 12/24/08 -
Post by: klaasend on December 31, 2008, 12:11:59 PM
LDSTLOU - Jug thinks he's being told the truth.  Dave Holloway thinks that MIP6 (the one who is best friends with Renfro) is a good guy and helping.  Jug/Beth/Dave/Robin can be fooled and so can we.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #787 12/24/08 -
Post by: ldstlou on December 31, 2008, 12:12:00 PM
Ldstlou I believe you are being mis-lead.  I'm not going to be drug into this again, and my credibility shot to hell.  I never received complete answers to my questions.  Did it ever occur to you that Jug was not being told the truth?  Did it ever occur to you that Kyle was not being truthful to you?

I'm sorry, but I don't believe what you are being told.  It's false information.  JMO



I am not dragging you into anything Snoopy, you made it clear that you were "fooled once" by me and that you won't let it happen again. But you did urge me to get on here and discuss what Kyle told me.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #787 12/24/08 -
Post by: Frank on December 31, 2008, 12:12:05 PM
Good monkey


http://www.darkskiesblog.com/2008/12/31/chimpanzee-learns-to-ride-a-segway-hilarious-video-embed/


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #787 12/24/08 -
Post by: klaasend on December 31, 2008, 12:14:51 PM
Good monkey


http://www.darkskiesblog.com/2008/12/31/chimpanzee-learns-to-ride-a-segway-hilarious-video-embed/

LOL  ::MonkeyHaHa::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #787 12/24/08 -
Post by: ldstlou on December 31, 2008, 12:16:11 PM

Looks like a skull and is a skull are not the same thing.  Tim Miller is a hero and I respect him in everyway.  But, from a logical stand point I still am not certain that was a skull in that trap.  Maybe it was...but the information available today does not validate that.

Still to the point, no one appears to have openly questioned the thumbs down at 15:40 on 12/30/07 when the image we are seeing would have been on the monitor.  Why?  (The Why? is rhetorical for this forum.  I know we weren't there so the answer to that would not be available)  We have all kinds of people looking at that image saying "That's a skull".  Yet no one looking at the monitor ever seems to say "Hey, what do mean thumbs down?  I see a skull or something that looks like a skull right there in front of your faces!  Why the thumbs down?"  Is there any evidence that anyone did or said anything like that at 15:40 on 12/30/07?  If so, I have not seen or heard it.  And that is one reason why I have not completely committed to idea that a skull was recovered from that trap.

Sorry if this sounds disrespectful.  I do not mean it that way.  I just don't know any other way to state my opinion on this.  ::MonkeyCool::

It didn't sound disrespectful at all to me.

Tim Miller was removed from the Persistence on Dec 30th by John Silvetti.  While Kyle did not go into great detail with us over the reason WHY, he did say it was because John felt Tim had become a liability - and because John and Tim had a disagreement.

When I personally pressed Kyle on the issue of the disagreement between John and Tim - I asked him if it was because Tim Miller shared the same view that Kyle does - that those were human remains in the trap.  Kyle said YES.

Tim Miller wasn't removed from anywhere...are you kidding me? You really think he would allow himself to be removed? He was following up a lead in Nicaragua.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #787 12/24/08 -
Post by: snoopy on December 31, 2008, 12:17:20 PM
Ldstlou I believe you are being mis-lead.  I'm not going to be drug into this again, and my credibility shot to hell.  I never received complete answers to my questions.  Did it ever occur to you that Jug was not being told the truth?  Did it ever occur to you that Kyle was not being truthful to you?

I'm sorry, but I don't believe what you are being told.  It's false information.  JMO



I am not dragging you into anything Snoopy, you made it clear that you were "fooled once" by me and that you won't let it happen again. But you did urge me to get on here and discuss what Kyle told me.

ldstlou you never gave detail information as to when the family recieved the pictures.  Not one time.  I am sorry that it is my opinion that you are being mis-lead.  I'm not going to be mis-lead.  You are my friend.  I don't want to lose that, but I can't agree with you on this one.  You told me everything you knew and at that point I then made a determination that I did not believe what you were being told.  It's as simple as that.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #787 12/24/08 -
Post by: Blonde on December 31, 2008, 12:18:54 PM
I tried to pay attention to Caps because Klaas vouched for who he was...not what he said...

Once the boolean math equations hit the boards, I really thought my time could be better spent elsewhere.

And I'm trying to figure out right now if I was conned.  I would not be the first time in this case.  I would still like to believe that Caps is one of the good guys but there are some things he has said that make me wonder.  Like Finngirl pointed out, Caps tried to tell us the intials for names are read last name first (not true). 

OK a few times when Caps was on. I checked the site meter no one from Aruba was on?
I thought it was just a 5 min. delay thing.



Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #787 12/24/08 -
Post by: Keepthefaith on December 31, 2008, 12:20:12 PM
Again.ldstlou.I just want to hear what you think in the simplest terms.Did Kyle turn over all pertinent information over  to the FBI and The Holloway family in a timely manner?Yes or No?


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #787 12/24/08 -
Post by: truthseeker2 on December 31, 2008, 12:20:16 PM
I have calculated that the skull in the cage is about 4.5 inches (11.4 cm) long.
That seems to me very small for a skull.

The average Skull Length of a human is 8.45 inches (21.5cm).


Yes i did the same (if it is a skull it is a very small one ) 4 inches
(10 cm )

+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++

I asked a Dive company in Rotterdam if the pics (if' send the pics to them ) were taken with a ROV and what he thinks about the content of the cage .
i spoke with the Owner of the dive company (they work daily (worldwide)with the ROV) and hey said to me that it is certainly not a human body.

Dear Johan,



The images were created with a R.O.V. The images were taken at around 91 f. That means 91 feet approximately 30 meters water depth.

The white stain bottom of the cage is very likely that sand by the weight of the cage through the mesh (net) is pressed. Because the cage at the bottom state.

Photo 2 is a photograph of a t.v. screen on which to see how the R.O.V. about 3 meters above the cage hangs (81 f) right we see the manipulator of the ROV in the picture .. The manipulator is a kind of movable and rotating grasping forceps.

Other photos are the same only what is here played with contrast and color. The objects in the cage are in my view hermit crabs. Hermit crabs have a shell to protect. When they bigger, the shell left, and they go looking for another shell.

A second possibility is that during the submersible of the cage, the cage was rotated 180 º and the bait top of the cage is hung (in order to lure crabs) now on the ground seems to lie. The bait is suspended with a piece of steel wire and a weight to the well to hang. This weight may be anything but what is on a crab boat.

The cage itself is heavily vegetated that is to say that it is already at least half years in the water must have been. Cages are used time and time again, and look not so overgrown off.



I am assuming here that you can continue.





Best regards,



DIVE & COMPANY MAAS Waal
Rotterdam

johann,

Interesting stuff.  Thanks for taking the initiative to have someone look at the images.  I appreciate you posting the results of their review.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #787 12/24/08 -
Post by: SunnyinTX on December 31, 2008, 12:21:43 PM
I don't post on the Natalee thread anymore because I do not feel I have anything to offer....however I do read and try to keep up, except for the past month or so... this morning I had  time to get caught up and now I wish I didn't.  I think I know why many of us no longer post here. MY GOD!  I have never seen monkeys at each others throat like this. I don't give a damn who you are...or how close you feel you are to 'the family' if you think the family is going to tell you everything...get REAL!!  You post on a public forum...........the family is not stupid. I am really sickened to read a lot of what is on here.....just because someone, 'in the know' tells you something doesn't mean it is TRUE or factual. I am not taking sides with anyone...........but I sure wish some of you would step back....go back and read what you write..............when I read a post that starts out with 'you people' I immediately think Oh F..here we go again!!!  OK...back to lurking........Happy New Year to everyone. Klaas  and Mods...Bless your hearts

I take it that was directed at me. I am surprised that you don't have a problem with the conspiracy theory Kermit has come up with. Lives are disrupted and careers and relationships are being destoyed and thats ok?

Lisa.....I didn't direct anything at you...please don't put words in my mouth.  You know me well enough to know that if I was directing this at you I would have said so. I am not known for being 'politically correct'.  ::MonkeyWink:: I had an opportunity to read this entire thread this morning and I posted what I felt after reading it.  I don't know who I believe..I don't know what I believe...and reading this thread did nothing to help me.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #787 12/24/08 -
Post by: klaasend on December 31, 2008, 12:22:16 PM
(http://i118.photobucket.com/albums/o100/klaasen3/Sub5/moderator%20pics/MODLOCK1.gif)

Please move to NCD# 788

http://scaredmonkeys.net/index.php?topic=4328.0