Scared Monkeys Discussion Forum

Natalee Holloway => LCD Archive => Topic started by: klaasend on December 31, 2008, 12:20:37 PM



Title: Natalee Case Discussion #788 12/31/08 - 1/01/09
Post by: klaasend on December 31, 2008, 12:20:37 PM
http://i118.photobucket.com/albums/o100/klaasen3/Sub3/Natalee2.swf



JUSTICE FOR NATALEE


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #788 12/31/08 -
Post by: Keepthefaith on December 31, 2008, 12:23:29 PM
ldstlou.Did Kyle turn over all pertinent information over to the Holloway family as well as the FBI in a timely manner?Yes or No?


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #788 12/31/08 -
Post by: snoopy on December 31, 2008, 12:23:46 PM
come across........


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #788 12/31/08 -
Post by: klaasend on December 31, 2008, 12:24:44 PM
come across........

Exactly  ::MonkeyCool::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #788 12/31/08 -
Post by: Keepthefaith on December 31, 2008, 12:26:08 PM
come across........

Exactly  ::MonkeyCool::

Break on through to the other side.............


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #788 12/31/08 -
Post by: jen3560 on December 31, 2008, 12:27:10 PM
ldstlou wrote:
Tim Miller wasn't removed from anywhere...are you kidding me? You really think he would allow himself to be removed? He was following up a lead in Nicaragua.
------------------


I'm sorry to say - yes he was.  Along with Dateline.

Dec 30th, Kyle and Tim Miller discussed this issue in detail, but they didn't know how to handle it.  Then Kyle took a nap.  When he got up, Tim and Dateline had been ejected from the boat.

ldstlou, I don't know what fairy tales Kyle and others are now telling you, but Kyle's posts (with IP, date and time) are in their original form from when he posted them.  This item was discussed over several posts.

The Nicarauga thing didn't happen for a few more days after that, IIRC.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #788 12/31/08 -
Post by: klaasend on December 31, 2008, 12:27:17 PM
ldstlou.Did Kyle turn over all pertinent information over to the Holloway family as well as the FBI in a timely manner?Yes or No?

See that's not specific enough, I want to know precisely WHEN KYLE turned over the information he thought he had to Beth/Jug and the FBI.  I would also want to know why KYLE was negotiating with the networks to gain financially from this prior to turning over what he thought he had to the family and FBI.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #788 12/31/08 -
Post by: SunnyinTX on December 31, 2008, 12:29:36 PM
come across........

Snoops I was waving at you in the last thread and didn't realize I was locked out!

Lisa I hope you saw my last post to you....but just in case you didn't I am bring in here

Quote from: ldstlou on Today at 11:08:36 AM
Quote from: SunnyinTX on Today at 11:04:30 AM
I don't post on the Natalee thread anymore because I do not feel I have anything to offer....however I do read and try to keep up, except for the past month or so... this morning I had  time to get caught up and now I wish I didn't.  I think I know why many of us no longer post here. MY GOD!  I have never seen monkeys at each others throat like this. I don't give a damn who you are...or how close you feel you are to 'the family' if you think the family is going to tell you everything...get REAL!!  You post on a public forum...........the family is not stupid. I am really sickened to read a lot of what is on here.....just because someone, 'in the know' tells you something doesn't mean it is TRUE or factual. I am not taking sides with anyone...........but I sure wish some of you would step back....go back and read what you write..............when I read a post that starts out with 'you people' I immediately think Oh F..here we go again!!!  OK...back to lurking........Happy New Year to everyone. Klaas  and Mods...Bless your hearts

I take it that was directed at me. I am surprised that you don't have a problem with the conspiracy theory Kermit has come up with. Lives are disrupted and careers and relationships are being destoyed and thats ok?

Lisa.....I didn't direct anything at you...please don't put words in my mouth.  You know me well enough to know that if I was directing this at you I would have said so. I am not known for being 'politically correct'.  I had an opportunity to read this entire thread this morning and I posted what I felt after reading it.  I don't know who I believe..I don't know what I believe...and reading this thread did nothing to help me.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #788 12/31/08 -
Post by: wingnut on December 31, 2008, 12:31:38 PM
ldstlou wrote:
Tim Miller wasn't removed from anywhere...are you kidding me? You really think he would allow himself to be removed? He was following up a lead in Nicaragua.
------------------


I'm sorry to say - yes he was.  Along with Dateline.

Dec 30th, Kyle and Tim Miller discussed this issue in detail, but they didn't know how to handle it.  Then Kyle took a nap.  When he got up, Tim and Dateline had been ejected from the boat.

ldstlou, I don't know what fairy tales Kyle and others are now telling you, but Kyle's posts (with IP, date and time) are in their original form from when he posted them.  This item was discussed over several posts.

The Nicarauga thing didn't happen for a few more days after that, IIRC.



Exactly, Jen.  IIRC, Kyle stated that Dec 30th was "crushing" - that Tim Miller and Dateline were REMOVED from the boat.



Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #788 12/31/08 -
Post by: Keepthefaith on December 31, 2008, 12:33:54 PM
ldstlou.Did Kyle turn over all pertinent information over to the Holloway family as well as the FBI in a timely manner?Yes or No?

See that's not specific enough, I want to know precisely WHEN KYLE turned over the information he thought he had to Beth/Jug and the FBI.  I would also want to know why KYLE was negotiating with the networks to gain financially from this prior to turning over what he thought he had to the family and FBI.

I understand Klaas.Ldstlou?WHEN did Kyle turn all pertinent information over to the FBI as well as the Holloway family?


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #788 12/31/08 -
Post by: jen3560 on December 31, 2008, 12:34:37 PM
ldstlou wrote:
Tim Miller wasn't removed from anywhere...are you kidding me? You really think he would allow himself to be removed? He was following up a lead in Nicaragua.
------------------


I'm sorry to say - yes he was.  Along with Dateline.

Dec 30th, Kyle and Tim Miller discussed this issue in detail, but they didn't know how to handle it.  Then Kyle took a nap.  When he got up, Tim and Dateline had been ejected from the boat.

ldstlou, I don't know what fairy tales Kyle and others are now telling you, but Kyle's posts (with IP, date and time) are in their original form from when he posted them.  This item was discussed over several posts.

The Nicarauga thing didn't happen for a few more days after that, IIRC.



Exactly, Jen.  IIRC, Kyle stated that Dec 30th was "crushing" - that Tim Miller and Dateline were REMOVED from the boat.



Precisely!

But ldstlou does bring up an interesting point.

I remember we all thought that Nicaragua tip was hinky at the time.

I wonder just who, if anyone, put that tipster up to that?  Especially right at that precise time?


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #788 12/31/08 -
Post by: jen3560 on December 31, 2008, 12:36:19 PM
ldstlou.Did Kyle turn over all pertinent information over to the Holloway family as well as the FBI in a timely manner?Yes or No?

See that's not specific enough, I want to know precisely WHEN KYLE turned over the information he thought he had to Beth/Jug and the FBI.  I would also want to know why KYLE was negotiating with the networks to gain financially from this prior to turning over what he thought he had to the family and FBI.

I understand Klaas.Ldstlou?WHEN did Kyle turn all pertinent information over to the FBI as well as the Holloway family?

I'm sorry guys - she's not going to be able to answer that, because it never happened.

I would like to see the creative dates that she may try and come back with though.  ::MonkeyRoll::  And see just how they correspond with what/when/how we (including Kyle) know transpired.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #788 12/31/08 -
Post by: johan555 on December 31, 2008, 12:37:24 PM
Quote from: johan555 on Today at 10:16:40 AM
Quote from: bastibro on December 29, 2008, 02:42:11 PM
I have calculated that the skull in the cage is about 4.5 inches (11.4 cm) long.
That seems to me very small for a skull.

The average Skull Length of a human is 8.45 inches (21.5cm).

Yes i did the same (if it is a skull it is a very small one ) 4 inches
(10 cm )

+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++

I asked a Dive company in Rotterdam if the pics (if' send the pics to them ) were taken with a ROV and what he thinks about the content of the cage .
i spoke with the Owner of the dive company (they work daily (worldwide)with the ROV) and hey said to me that it is certainly not a human body.

Dear Johan,



The images were created with a R.O.V. The images were taken at around 91 f. That means 91 feet approximately 30 meters water depth.

The white stain bottom of the cage is very likely that sand by the weight of the cage through the mesh (net) is pressed. Because the cage at the bottom state.

Photo 2 is a photograph of a t.v. screen on which to see how the R.O.V. about 3 meters above the cage hangs (81 f) right we see the manipulator of the ROV in the picture .. The manipulator is a kind of movable and rotating grasping forceps.

Other photos are the same only what is here played with contrast and color. The objects in the cage are in my view hermit crabs. Hermit crabs have a shell to protect. When they bigger, the shell left, and they go looking for another shell.

A second possibility is that during the submersible of the cage, the cage was rotated 180 º and the bait top of the cage is hung (in order to lure crabs) now on the ground seems to lie. The bait is suspended with a piece of steel wire and a weight to the well to hang. This weight may be anything but what is on a crab boat.

The cage itself is heavily vegetated that is to say that it is already at least half years in the water must have been. Cages are used time and time again, and look not so overgrown off.



I am assuming here that you can continue.





Best regards,



DIVE & COMPANY MAAS Waal
Rotterdam

johann,

Interesting stuff.  Thanks for taking the initiative to have someone look at the images.  I appreciate you posting the results of their review.


++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
thanks truthseeker2  ::MonkeyDance::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #788 12/31/08 -
Post by: Keepthefaith on December 31, 2008, 12:39:53 PM
ldstlou.Did Kyle turn over all pertinent information over to the Holloway family as well as the FBI in a timely manner?Yes or No?

See that's not specific enough, I want to know precisely WHEN KYLE turned over the information he thought he had to Beth/Jug and the FBI.  I would also want to know why KYLE was negotiating with the networks to gain financially from this prior to turning over what he thought he had to the family and FBI.

I understand Klaas.Ldstlou?WHEN did Kyle turn all pertinent information over to the FBI as well as the Holloway family?

I'm sorry guys - she's not going to be able to answer that, because it never happened.

I would like to see the creative dates that she may try and come back with though.  ::MonkeyRoll::  And see just how they correspond with what/when/how we (including Kyle) know transpired.

Thanx Jen.That is the point!If Kyle didn't turn information over in a timely manner and has mislead people.Why defend him?Let him speak for himself!


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #788 12/31/08 -
Post by: snoopy on December 31, 2008, 12:40:21 PM
wingnut and jen3560 thank you for coming here and talking to us.  It means a lot.  And I hope you know that I have always appreciated the Freebirds work.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #788 12/31/08 -
Post by: johan555 on December 31, 2008, 12:41:17 PM
Happy New Year's Monkeys !!


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #788 12/31/08 -
Post by: snoopy on December 31, 2008, 12:41:54 PM
I don't believe for one second that Tim Miller was removed from the Persistence because he was an emotional liability.  Yea that's what I was told.  pppfffttt.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #788 12/31/08 -
Post by: texasmom on December 31, 2008, 12:42:38 PM
Happy New Year's Monkeys !!

Happy New Year to you too Johan!


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #788 12/31/08 -
Post by: jen3560 on December 31, 2008, 12:43:02 PM
Thanks snoopy!!

The Freebirds put a lot of time and effort into all the fifty some odd documents we produced.

It's a fantastic group of people who put their guts into it!!


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #788 12/31/08 -
Post by: texasmom on December 31, 2008, 12:49:42 PM
I don't believe for one second that Tim Miller was removed from the Persistence because he was an emotional liability.  Yea that's what I was told.  pppfffttt.

Me either!   ::MonkeyNoNo::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #788 12/31/08 -
Post by: jen3560 on December 31, 2008, 12:50:33 PM
I don't believe for one second that Tim Miller was removed from the Persistence because he was an emotional liability.  Yea that's what I was told.  pppfffttt.

Really?  ::MonkeyNoNo::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #788 12/31/08 -
Post by: snoopy on December 31, 2008, 12:51:04 PM
Happy New Year's Monkeys !!

Happy New Year Johan. 

Hopefully 2009 will bring Natalee home to Alabama soil.  I believe Aruba can make that happen.  I'm with Magnolia in that they have Natalee's remains.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #788 12/31/08 -
Post by: truthseeker2 on December 31, 2008, 12:52:51 PM
Happy New Year's Monkeys !!

AND MAY 2009 FIND JUSTICE FOR NATALEE!


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #788 12/31/08 -
Post by: snoopy on December 31, 2008, 12:53:37 PM
I don't believe for one second that Tim Miller was removed from the Persistence because he was an emotional liability.  Yea that's what I was told.  pppfffttt.

Really?  ::MonkeyNoNo::

Yep and at that time I kept telling myself that this was not right and that the messenger was being mis-lead.  I kept hoping that she would see that but didn't.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #788 12/31/08 -
Post by: ldstlou on December 31, 2008, 12:53:52 PM
come across........

Snoops I was waving at you in the last thread and didn't realize I was locked out!

Lisa I hope you saw my last post to you....but just in case you didn't I am bring in here

Quote from: ldstlou on Today at 11:08:36 AM
Quote from: SunnyinTX on Today at 11:04:30 AM
I don't post on the Natalee thread anymore because I do not feel I have anything to offer....however I do read and try to keep up, except for the past month or so... this morning I had  time to get caught up and now I wish I didn't.  I think I know why many of us no longer post here. MY GOD!  I have never seen monkeys at each others throat like this. I don't give a damn who you are...or how close you feel you are to 'the family' if you think the family is going to tell you everything...get REAL!!  You post on a public forum...........the family is not stupid. I am really sickened to read a lot of what is on here.....just because someone, 'in the know' tells you something doesn't mean it is TRUE or factual. I am not taking sides with anyone...........but I sure wish some of you would step back....go back and read what you write..............when I read a post that starts out with 'you people' I immediately think Oh F..here we go again!!!  OK...back to lurking........Happy New Year to everyone. Klaas  and Mods...Bless your hearts

I take it that was directed at me. I am surprised that you don't have a problem with the conspiracy theory Kermit has come up with. Lives are disrupted and careers and relationships are being destoyed and thats ok?

Lisa.....I didn't direct anything at you...please don't put words in my mouth.  You know me well enough to know that if I was directing this at you I would have said so. I am not known for being 'politically correct'.  I had an opportunity to read this entire thread this morning and I posted what I felt after reading it.  I don't know who I believe..I don't know what I believe...and reading this thread did nothing to help me.

Sorry Sunny, I was finishing up an online exam...and sorry for jumping the gun...feeling a bit ganged up on lately and a bit sensitive!!
Sorry I misread you post!!


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #788 12/31/08 -
Post by: Tamikosmom on December 31, 2008, 12:55:53 PM
ldstlou
Re: Natalee Case Discussion #787 12/24/08 -
« Reply #968 on: Today at 03:06:07 PM »


... I have copied and posted to Jug all of Kermits "evidence" and it hasn't changed his opinion, so I am assuming he does not feel he was duped my Kyle or the members of the persistence.

http://scaredmonkeys.net/index.php?topic=4269.960

+++++++++++


Lou

Has Jug Twitty been privy to the following compilation of Kyle's own words?

Yes.  No.

Janet

_______

KYLE KINGMAN - PRIVATE FORUM

Kyle:
I have not given anything to the FBI since the pictures and statements from Dec 29th

Kyle: None of us gave any statements to the authorities after the 29th. It's possible John Silvetti did, because he was the only one conversing with them after Jan 7th.

Kyle: I've talked with Peter Shouten numerous times back in February. He hasn't seen anything but knows about the blue fabrics. DeVries and Endemol was interested in purchasing the ROV footage and I was working between them, ABC, and CBS to strike a deal.

Kyle: In case it isn't clear.. notice the blue denim-like fabric

Kyle: The Aruban divers were on the police boat, dove from their boat, and returned to their boat.

Kyle: They were immediately whisked away by the Aruban police and not seen of again by us on the 7th

Kyle: John stood back and waited and worked with the Aruban Polis

Kyle: John definitely believed the Arubans at their every word

Kyle: John didn't want Tim Miller on board the Persistence because he said Tim wasn't necessary any more and was a liability

Kyle: John told me then he didn't want to hear me ever mention the trap again.

Kyle: Schafer is sue crazy.

Kyle: I did not feel the same and we had a major difference in opinion. He [John Silvetti] was the one who never pressed ALE to be completely open with us with the trap evidence. I would have forced them to. However, John was the one paying my invoices so I was forced to sit back and hope for the best.

Kyle: We all know it wasn't a blouse, but I believe they were sent some piece of fabric other than the fabric found inside the trap.

Kyle: I've talked with Peter Shouten numerous times back in February. He hasn't seen anything but knows about the blue fabrics. DeVries and Endemol was interested in purchasing the ROV footage and I was working between them, ABC, and CBS to strike a deal.

Kyle: Louis is currently working with someone who I do not know to put together some documentary on the case, the way it was handled, and what happened during the search. I learned this from Tim T. yesterday. Louis was sold on the idea that it will make him a lot of money.

Kyle: The portion of the discolored blue fabric was presumably on the bottom of the fabric. In my opinion this discoloration is not another type of fabric, but rather biological staining or discoloration from biological growth caused from a high organic carbon content and decay. Basically, during decay a biological mat will form around the organics from remains. This is what I believe it is on the bottom of the fabric.

Kyle: John Silvetti told me today that he may be returning to Aruba very soon for a few days.

Kyle: I couldn't get the logs from the Persistence. All things "Holloway" were stripped from the boat once it got back to Louisiana

Kyle: He's [John Silvetti] seriously making plans to open an Aruba office so he can conduct business easier in S. America and that would allow him to do that.

Kyle: It was confirmed by the FBI that they received a fabric sample send by Richardson and that it wasn't a match to Natalee's blouse. I think the video can prove or disprove whatever the FBI was sent was the same object or not. I strongly believe it's blue denim. Everyone I show thinks the same thing without being prompted (including senior ABC execs).

Klye: We're being fed misinformation to keep us searching and out of their way while they cover their asses, destroy evidence, cover their tracks, and keep us out at sea and away from the trap.

Kyle: neither Dave, Robin, or Beth has seen any of the ROV footage aside from what was broadcasted on Dateline or the pictures leaked from the FBI to Dave (and Robin H.). Beth has seen nothing in my knowledge.

Kyle: John is not a believer in the trap. He took ALE's word as gospel that it wasn't case related, yet never studied the videos or bothered to inquire further. He had plans on doing business with Aruba and in S. America and he didn't want to hurt any feelings by talks hinting at lack of complete trust and friendship.

Kyle: Notice the end of the skirt is an identical match to the 90 degree angle in the sand. I believe her left arm was outstretched with her legs slightly bent. I did not edit the legs. I believe the tarp was placed over her and tucked around her, or perhaps tied down. I believe there are several rocks laying on the sand which were placed on the tarp, or inside the tarp over her body which explains their unusual location. Either way, the proportions appear promising.

Kyle: I took the proportions of the body form from the head, to shoulder, to a 90 degree angle which I believed to be the hem line of Natalee's skirt. I then took those proportions and matched them to the photo of Natalee with what she was last seen wearing. The proportions matched within an inch from head, to shoulder, to skirt line. Based on this comparison and with what we believed we saw in the Dec 29th video, Tim Miller contacted the family and told them the 99.9% comment. I told Tim not to do anything until we have forensic results back after the site is processed. Jan 7th we sampled the contents and in my opinion we found the skirt under the sand along with the other items The blue fabric was found right where the skirt is pictured. If it isn't her, it will forever haunt me as a major cosmic WTF.

kyle: Richardson was onboard the Persistence several times and attended the meetings on the boat. You may see a glimpse of him on the Dateline video in the survey room along with Mos standing over my shoulder.

Kyle: The bags were removed just after the ROV got out of the way when the divers took the samples to their boat.... and took off

Kyle: We're close to finding the Dirty Hand and a major leak plaguing the investigation. I believe they're linked. I'm assuming Caps isn't deep inside ALE, but do we know that he isn't? We need to figure out who Cap's source is and what he does.  Can we confirm Destiny's source is a Dairio reporter? If so, do we know who this would be? Could it be Eduardo Mansur???

Kyle: THis is what I'm trying to figure out now. I need to know the leak! I believe Caps is only one step away from DirtyHand

Kyle: I need to know what we know about Caps and Destiny. I need their names if possible.

Klye:  I did not give the information to the FBI and I'm unaware of anyone relaying the possibility to them.

Klye: I havn't spoken to Beth and don't plan to personally.


KYLE KINGMAN - SCARED MONKEYS

JANUARY 26, 2008

oceanexploration
Re: Natalee Case Discussion #715 1/25 -
« Reply #103 on: January 26, 2008, 12:38:25 PM »


Thought you all may find this interesting if you're willing to accept it-

To date, the Aruban police and dive team has been a tremendous help.  They've honestly done a great job. Over the last month we've established a very good working relationship based on openness and trust.  Most of the relationship success was due to getting the media out of the way and working together shoulder to shoulder over time.  We've helped each other however and whenever we can.  They've treated us with decency and respect and we have treated them as friends and allies, which they are. Most of the police and divers are new since this case started and both eager and careful to do things right.  I wish we had a month ahead of the project just to establish the relationships and trust. I know many of you would likely doubt this view, but it's based on the experiences in the field of the entire search team. I too was extremely worried, paranoid, and suspecting in the beginning.  Now, it's clear we're all working towards a common goal.

http://scaredmonkeys.net/index.php?topic=2539.msg332457;topicseen#msg332457
 

MARCH 19, 2008

oceanexploration
Re: Natalee Case Discussion #744 3/19 -
« Reply #201 on: March 19, 2008, 08:21:47 PM »


We had little option other than to have the Aruban dive division recover the samples and bring them back under their care.  Remember we are Americans working in Aruban waters, subject to their laws, invitation, and blessing.  Our hands are tied for the most part. I personally was extremely uncomfortable with the chain of custody, being that we weren't a part of it, but I was powerless to do anything about it.   The samples were photographed in detail by one Aruban diver and the other two investigated the contents of the trap, the dimensions, the rigging, and what surrounded the trap.  From the video, it looked like they did a diligent and careful job with the samples and the underwater photography.  I don't know who has these pictures, but I must assume ALE.

http://scaredmonkeys.net/index.php?topic=2721.msg366857;topicseen#msg366857

 
BROTHER OF BETH HOLLOWAY - SCARED MONKEYS FORUM

private eye
Re: Natalee Case Discussion #746 4/4
« Reply #499 on: April 09, 2008, 12:39:50 AM »


If I understood Kyle correctly, and that would be that the Arubans retrieved and possessed all finds, not sharing anything with the crew, then that effort was a waste of time and effort. The only thing it could have accomplished was to locate additional evidence for the Arubans to destroy. I am not sure if that was the protocol out of Aruba's waters though. The effort was superb, but the game was fixed.

http://scaredmonkeys.net/index.php?topic=2769.msg372245;topicseen#msg372245


THE ROV IMAGES

Re: Natalee Case Discussion #778 11/23/08 -
« Reply #408 on: November 24, 2008, 03:59:08 PM »


http://scaredmonkeys.net/index.php?topic=4173.msg555618#msg555618
 
 
Re: Natalee Case Discussion #778 11/23/08 -
« Reply #410 on: November 24, 2008, 04:01:55 PM »


Photos given to the FBI sent to Dave and Robin posted on the internet are NOT the
photos posted above.  These were not given to the FBI until recently.

http://scaredmonkeys.net/index.php?topic=4173.msg555621#msg555621
 
++++++++++
 
Kyle Kingman
Senior Geophysical Project Manager at Alpine Ocean Seismic Survey Inc.
Greater New York City Area


Current
Senior Geophysical Operations Manager at Alpine Ocean Seismic Survey Inc.
 
Past
Manager at Kingman Geophysical Solutions
 
Education
Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey-New Brunswick
 
Industry
Oil & Energy






Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #788 12/31/08 -
Post by: ldstlou on December 31, 2008, 12:56:09 PM
ldstlou.Did Kyle turn over all pertinent information over to the Holloway family as well as the FBI in a timely manner?Yes or No?

See that's not specific enough, I want to know precisely WHEN KYLE turned over the information he thought he had to Beth/Jug and the FBI.  I would also want to know why KYLE was negotiating with the networks to gain financially from this prior to turning over what he thought he had to the family and FBI.

I understand Klaas.Ldstlou?WHEN did Kyle turn all pertinent information over to the FBI as well as the Holloway family?

I'm sorry guys - she's not going to be able to answer that, because it never happened.

I would like to see the creative dates that she may try and come back with though.  ::MonkeyRoll::  And see just how they correspond with what/when/how we (including Kyle) know transpired.

Thanx Jen.That is the point!If Kyle didn't turn information over in a timely manner and has mislead people.Why defend him?Let him speak for himself!

ok...in one post you ask me questions about when and what was turned over and in the next you say don't answer for him.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #788 12/31/08 -
Post by: snoopy on December 31, 2008, 12:56:34 PM
ldstlou I wish you would re-think everything you have been told.  Search members for Kermit, Kyle, Tamikosmom, wingnut, jen3560.  Read all their posts.  They are not lying.  JMHO  you have been mis-lead.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #788 12/31/08 -
Post by: Keepthefaith on December 31, 2008, 12:56:37 PM
ldstlou.Did Kyle turn over all pertinent information over to the Holloway family as well as the FBI in a timely manner?Yes or No?

See that's not specific enough, I want to know precisely WHEN KYLE turned over the information he thought he had to Beth/Jug and the FBI.  I would also want to know why KYLE was negotiating with the networks to gain financially from this prior to turning over what he thought he had to the family and FBI.


Ld stlou??


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #788 12/31/08 -
Post by: MumInOhio on December 31, 2008, 12:56:39 PM
I am 10 pages back in the other thread, and forgive me if I am wrong, But Muffy and 2NJS are you saying I am a mole?
What the heck has got in to some of you?

 As for a flyby...I only just caught up and Kermit posted. My post from last night has been posted about before since November. Did either of you see the posts?

I asked Kermit questions which she did not answer after she was here 2 visits ago. She did not acknowledge my questions on her next questions.

She cut and pasted bits of posts from Shango for her posts. I checked and posted on this. More than once. She cheated to make her her point.

I joined a Private forum, because of the constant talk about this trap. Other things were happening we have been told  over and over to focus on the trap. No matter what else I posted about I very seldom got a response. As well as if you don't buy what some here are saying they treat you ugly.

Yesterday you welcomed 2 Newbies with open arms from a Private forum...But this is different...How!

I don't know what their motives for joining SM after all this time was, but as far as I am concerned I don't know either of them from a bar of soap...so they will both have to any respect from me!






Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #788 12/31/08 -
Post by: Buckeye on December 31, 2008, 12:56:40 PM
buckeye:

I do have a little question.  JQK seemed to want to run with the trafficking story.  I just wonder if that is to bring the case to a level of international involvement.  This could permit an international investigation.  The investigation may come to the conclusion that there was no trafficking and the remains were hidden in a cage.  Is it important to "believe" in a bigger theory to legally involve more than internet posters and hidey hole sleuths??

truthseeker2:

I wondered the exact same thing when JQK was talking to Greta.  I even posted questions about it here at SM...but not many were interested in discussing it at that time.  If JQK can move this story or theory, I think it could get more international attention and put more pressure on Aruba to get to the truth.  At the very worst it could put a spotlight on this huge problem even if the truth about Natalee does not surface.


 :smt045 :smt045 :smt045


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #788 12/31/08 -
Post by: 2NJSons_Mom on December 31, 2008, 01:01:43 PM
ldstlou.Did Kyle turn over all pertinent information over to the Holloway family as well as the FBI in a timely manner?Yes or No?

See that's not specific enough, I want to know precisely WHEN KYLE turned over the information he thought he had to Beth/Jug and the FBI.  I would also want to know why KYLE was negotiating with the networks to gain financially from this prior to turning over what he thought he had to the family and FBI.

I understand Klaas.Ldstlou?WHEN did Kyle turn all pertinent information over to the FBI as well as the Holloway family?

I'm sorry guys - she's not going to be able to answer that, because it never happened.

I would like to see the creative dates that she may try and come back with though.  ::MonkeyRoll::  And see just how they correspond with what/when/how we (including Kyle) know transpired.

Thanx Jen.That is the point!If Kyle didn't turn information over in a timely manner and has mislead people.Why defend him?Let him speak for himself!

ok...in one post you ask me questions about when and what was turned over and in the next you say don't answer for him.

I don't remember you posting a response with a date and what was turned over.  In essence, you have not answered for Kyle with respect to that.  jmo


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #788 12/31/08 -
Post by: Tamikosmom on December 31, 2008, 01:02:15 PM
Sent to me by Natalee's Freebirds:

Please feel free (if you'd like) to post this at your board.
 
During the journey of the Persistence to Aruba, Kyle reached out and emailed with us.  During that time, one of the questions posed to him was regarding protocol if/when Natalee's remains were found.
 
Kyle's response was that he was unsure, but felt that would be settled before the search began.
 
The cautions were given to him about the lack of integrity on the part of Aruba's law enforcement, prosecutor's office, and its judiciary.
 
Contact with Kyle continued throughout the duration of the search by the Persistence.
 
Once back home, Kyle asked us for our help.  He was very concerned about the activities that transpired during their search - specifically surrounding the find of the fishing cage and its contents.  Kyle wanted our help in presenting this information in a factual way, to then be given to Natalee's family. 
 
This was March 18, 2008.  At that time, Kyle assured us he had just recently sent the images from the Dec 30th and Jan 7th dives to the FBI, but had never received a response from them.
 
We later found that to be false.
 
Also at that time, Beth's brother saw the images Kyle had shared with us - but none of the detail he shared later.

We compiled the images Kyle presented us, along with his opinions and the facts surrounding the sequence of events regarding that fishing cage.  Kyle stated he would be getting in touch with Beth Holloway.
 
We later found out that never happened.

At this time, Kyle shared with us the broadcast networks he had approached in February, in an attempt to sell these images to the highest bidder.
 
This didn't concern us greatly at that time - as we were under the impression US law enforcement and Natalee's family had already been made aware of their find.
 
Approximately May 2008 Kyle began dodging questions for details (we had asked for names of Aruban police and divers to be included in our documentation of these events), hedging on moving forward with this, and then he completely disappeared from our board.
 
During that time, we learned Kyle had never contacted Beth, or Dave, or the FBI with this information.
 
We put our original plan into motion - that of presenting this information in a clear and concise manner, and we sent it to Beth Holloway.
 
Beth was disturbed, needed time to digest the information, and wanted to share it with someone she trusts.
 
When Tim Miller was returning to Aruba this past fall, Beth gave us permission to release this information publicly.
 
At that point, we gave it to John Kelly, Carmen Adams with the FBI, and got it ready for public consumption.
 
The next step was to publish this information at our blog.
 
One of our members felt we were betraying Kyle in doing so, contacted him, and he re-surfaced at our site with threats of litigation against us - stating this was his "intellectual property" and we could not use it.
 
That of course concerned us greatly - as none of us could afford to be sued.
 
He also stated at that time, Luis Shaefer had just recently sold the rights of the video of these images to a broadcast company for the purposes of a documentary.
 
We contacted legal counsel and were advised to keep our distance from any Persistence crew member, in the face of potential obstruction/accessory charges.
 
At this point, one of our members decided to brace for the possibility of civil litigation, resigned from our membership to protect it from same, and posted what he knows to be factual at SM.
 
Kyle did tell us human remains were found in that fish cage.
 
Kyle did tell us about John Silvetti's intent to open an office on the island of Aruba, to enable him ease in conducting business in South America, and Aruba.
 
Kyle also told us of John's absolute refusal to give that fish cage and its contents any credence - before even it was inspected on Jan 7th.
 
Kyle told us in no uncertain terms that Tim Miller and Dateline were abruptly removed from the Persistence on Dec 30, resulting in only Persistence crew being aboard between that date and the Jan 7 dive of the Arubans.
 
Nothing that was posted at SM by kermit was incorrect, out of context, or in any way false.
 
Regards,
 
Former Natalee's Freebirds Administrator
Natalee and her family deserve justice - and we will not let up until they have it!



Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #788 12/31/08 -
Post by: ldstlou on December 31, 2008, 01:03:13 PM
ldstlou.Did Kyle turn over all pertinent information over to the Holloway family as well as the FBI in a timely manner?Yes or No?

See that's not specific enough, I want to know precisely WHEN KYLE turned over the information he thought he had to Beth/Jug and the FBI.  I would also want to know why KYLE was negotiating with the networks to gain financially from this prior to turning over what he thought he had to the family and FBI.

I understand Klaas.Ldstlou?WHEN did Kyle turn all pertinent information over to the FBI as well as the Holloway family?

I'm sorry guys - she's not going to be able to answer that, because it never happened.

I would like to see the creative dates that she may try and come back with though.  ::MonkeyRoll::  And see just how they correspond with what/when/how we (including Kyle) know transpired.

Thanx Jen.That is the point!If Kyle didn't turn information over in a timely manner and has mislead people.Why defend him?Let him speak for himself!

ok...in one post you ask me questions about when and what was turned over and in the next you say don't answer for him.

My bottom line is I am not involved in any conspiracy as stated my kermit yesterday, neither is Lalas.

I feel from the bottom of my heart that the members of the Persistence did a heroic deed in their search for Natalee at great expense to their time, and personal resources..and now at the expense of friendships and careers.To take what they did and turn it into a conspiracy to hide evidence and transfer bones and shoes etc to a pond in order to facilitate the conspiracy...I think it is just wrong.

I am not trying to brag about who I know or don't know, I simply sought out more answers when this came up, from Jug and from Kyle. I am satisfied with their answers.

I have said all along there are posters here who know Tim Miller and could ask his opinion on the matters, why won't anyone do that?

Others know the Holloway family...why not ask them? I would if I knew them.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #788 12/31/08 -
Post by: Keepthefaith on December 31, 2008, 01:06:11 PM
ldstlou.Did Kyle turn over all pertinent information over to the Holloway family as well as the FBI in a timely manner?Yes or No?

See that's not specific enough, I want to know precisely WHEN KYLE turned over the information he thought he had to Beth/Jug and the FBI.  I would also want to know why KYLE was negotiating with the networks to gain financially from this prior to turning over what he thought he had to the family and FBI.

I understand Klaas.Ldstlou?WHEN did Kyle turn all pertinent information over to the FBI as well as the Holloway family?

I'm sorry guys - she's not going to be able to answer that, because it never happened.

I would like to see the creative dates that she may try and come back with though.  ::MonkeyRoll::  And see just how they correspond with what/when/how we (including Kyle) know transpired.

Thanx Jen.That is the point!If Kyle didn't turn information over in a timely manner and has mislead people.Why defend him?Let him speak for himself!

ok...in one post you ask me questions about when and what was turned over and in the next you say don't answer for him.

I don't remember you posting a response with a date and what was turned over.  In essence, you have not answered for Kyle with respect to that.  jmo



Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #788 12/31/08 -
Post by: ldstlou on December 31, 2008, 01:09:02 PM
ldstlou I wish you would re-think everything you have been told.  Search members for Kermit, Kyle, Tamikosmom, wingnut, jen3560.  Read all their posts.  They are not lying.  JMHO  you have been mis-lead.

Snoopy I have read the posts. The posts are copied and pasted from the Freebird's forum...taken out of context. I know what they are and I know what they all say by now. Because they were taken out of context, I went straight to the source and asked for an explanation. He responded openly and honestly in my opinion. I am not an idiot and don't believe I have been mislead.

However...when Kermit starts posting shoes and skulls being moved by John Silvetti from the cage to the pond and Lalas and me being a part of the grand conspiracy and "bubbles being burst" and single handily exposing the cover-up...THAT is suspicious to me.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #788 12/31/08 -
Post by: jen3560 on December 31, 2008, 01:11:04 PM
I don't believe for one second that Tim Miller was removed from the Persistence because he was an emotional liability.  Yea that's what I was told.  pppfffttt.

Really?  ::MonkeyNoNo::

Yep and at that time I kept telling myself that this was not right and that the messenger was being mis-lead.  I kept hoping that she would see that but didn't.

Oh good crimeny sakes!  ::MonkeyNoNo::

Here is a post from private eye on Dec 30 of last year.  Interesting reading of his posts from that day and the 31st.

Have to believe that was the result of a phone call from Tim Miller to Beth (just like he called Dave), only for Tim to then be given the heave-ho from the boat - and lord only knows what happened to the items recovered from that trap on Jan7th.  Oh -and before any confusion arises - no, her family does not have them.  ::MonkeyWaa::


private eye wrote on December 30, 2007:

This may be an old subject, and if it is please forgive me.

What would you do if you were Beth and a body in a crab trap is found?

Turn it over to the Aruban authorities?

Turn it over to the FBI?

Closure vs Risk of magically turning blood into chocolate


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #788 12/31/08 -
Post by: Keepthefaith on December 31, 2008, 01:11:20 PM
ldstlou I wish you would re-think everything you have been told.  Search members for Kermit, Kyle, Tamikosmom, wingnut, jen3560.  Read all their posts.  They are not lying.  JMHO  you have been mis-lead.

Snoopy I have read the posts. The posts are copied and pasted from the Freebird's forum...taken out of context. I know what they are and I know what they all say by now. Because they were taken out of context, I went straight to the source and asked for an explanation. He responded openly and honestly in my opinion. I am not an idiot and don't believe I have been mislead.

However...when Kermit starts posting shoes and skulls being moved by John Silvetti from the cage to the pond and Lalas and me being a part of the grand conspiracy and "bubbles being burst" and single handily exposing the cover-up...THAT is suspicious to me.

Was Kyle not BANNED from Freebirds?Why?


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #788 12/31/08 -
Post by: klaasend on December 31, 2008, 01:11:57 PM
buckeye:

I do have a little question.  JQK seemed to want to run with the trafficking story.  I just wonder if that is to bring the case to a level of international involvement.  This could permit an international investigation.  The investigation may come to the conclusion that there was no trafficking and the remains were hidden in a cage.  Is it important to "believe" in a bigger theory to legally involve more than internet posters and hidey hole sleuths??

truthseeker2:

I wondered the exact same thing when JQK was talking to Greta.  I even posted questions about it here at SM...but not many were interested in discussing it at that time.  If JQK can move this story or theory, I think it could get more international attention and put more pressure on Aruba to get to the truth.  At the very worst it could put a spotlight on this huge problem even if the truth about Natalee does not surface.


 :smt045 :smt045 :smt045

That is the only reason why I can think of JQK acting as if he believes Joran's latest BS story and I did mention it at the time.  I have said many times that I don't believe for one minute that JQK or Beth believe what Joran said in his last interview to Greta. 



Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #788 12/31/08 -
Post by: SunnyinTX on December 31, 2008, 01:13:12 PM
wingnut and jen3560 thank you for coming here and talking to us.  It means a lot.  And I hope you know that I have always appreciated the Freebirds work.

Ditto for me......we all want the same thing...the truth....


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #788 12/31/08 -
Post by: 2NJSons_Mom on December 31, 2008, 01:14:59 PM
Mum,

I wondered how you were able to put names to posters here that Kermit alluded to.  I said I had the equation wrong and mentioned an underground thing I was not privy to...a reference hinting to the private forum. 

The mole question popped into my mind after the underground statement (thinking of the defunct TV show), and not specifically directed at you...., and no insult was intended.     


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #788 12/31/08 -
Post by: SunnyinTX on December 31, 2008, 01:15:14 PM
I don't believe for one second that Tim Miller was removed from the Persistence because he was an emotional liability.  Yea that's what I was told.  pppfffttt.

hahahahahahaha....that is a hoot!  yes Tim is emotional..passionate about what he does....but his emotion could only be called a liability by someone who was intimated by him.... ::MonkeyWink::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #788 12/31/08 -
Post by: SunnyinTX on December 31, 2008, 01:16:33 PM
Thanks snoopy!!

The Freebirds put a lot of time and effort into all the fifty some odd documents we produced.

It's a fantastic group of people who put their guts into it!!

Ya'll have been fantastic.....I have always wondered who you were...kinda like the Lone Ranger....WHO WAS THAT MASKED MAN!!


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #788 12/31/08 -
Post by: klaasend on December 31, 2008, 01:17:40 PM
ldstlou I wish you would re-think everything you have been told.  Search members for Kermit, Kyle, Tamikosmom, wingnut, jen3560.  Read all their posts.  They are not lying.  JMHO  you have been mis-lead.

Snoopy I have read the posts. The posts are copied and pasted from the Freebird's forum...taken out of context. I know what they are and I know what they all say by now. Because they were taken out of context, I went straight to the source and asked for an explanation. He responded openly and honestly in my opinion. I am not an idiot and don't believe I have been mislead.

However...when Kermit starts posting shoes and skulls being moved by John Silvetti from the cage to the pond and Lalas and me being a part of the grand conspiracy and "bubbles being burst" and single handily exposing the cover-up...THAT is suspicious to me.

Was Kyle not BANNED from Freebirds?Why?

Funny how people look at things in different ways.  I never got the impression that Kermit felt as though she was single handedly doing anything.

Ldstlou - ask Dave Holloway how he feels about Mark Purcell then tell me if you agree with everything Dave Holloway says.  Reminder, the Persistence search was arranged by TES and Dave Holloway, who inAruba does Dave Holloway listen to?  Who is best friends with Mark Purcell?  That alone should raise a red flag.



Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #788 12/31/08 -
Post by: bleachedblack on December 31, 2008, 01:18:28 PM
buckeye:

I do have a little question.  JQK seemed to want to run with the trafficking story.  I just wonder if that is to bring the case to a level of international involvement.  This could permit an international investigation.  The investigation may come to the conclusion that there was no trafficking and the remains were hidden in a cage.  Is it important to "believe" in a bigger theory to legally involve more than internet posters and hidey hole sleuths??

truthseeker2:

I wondered the exact same thing when JQK was talking to Greta.  I even posted questions about it here at SM...but not many were interested in discussing it at that time.  If JQK can move this story or theory, I think it could get more international attention and put more pressure on Aruba to get to the truth.  At the very worst it could put a spotlight on this huge problem even if the truth about Natalee does not surface.


 :smt045 :smt045 :smt045
I think the idea of human trafficking as a means of possibly getting others more directly  ie FBI and/or Interpol involved in Natalees disappearance was tried  on Dr Phil show when he had Jamie Skeeters go to Mexico and sA. As for Tim going to Nicaragua, I seem to recall on Dateline it being said that Dave asked Tim to check out this new tip?


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #788 12/31/08 -
Post by: truthseeker2 on December 31, 2008, 01:19:18 PM
buckeye:

I do have a little question.  JQK seemed to want to run with the trafficking story.  I just wonder if that is to bring the case to a level of international involvement.  This could permit an international investigation.  The investigation may come to the conclusion that there was no trafficking and the remains were hidden in a cage.  Is it important to "believe" in a bigger theory to legally involve more than internet posters and hidey hole sleuths??

truthseeker2:

I wondered the exact same thing when JQK was talking to Greta.  I even posted questions about it here at SM...but not many were interested in discussing it at that time.  If JQK can move this story or theory, I think it could get more international attention and put more pressure on Aruba to get to the truth.  At the very worst it could put a spotlight on this huge problem even if the truth about Natalee does not surface.


 :smt045 :smt045 :smt045

That is the only reason why I can think of JQK acting as if he believes Joran's latest BS story and I did mention it at the time.  I have said many times that I don't believe for one minute that JQK or Beth believe what Joran said in his last interview to Greta. 



Yes, Klaas, you did respond to my post back then.  I don't recall many other responses, though.  And, with all due respect, my response back to you then remains the same today.  Until the truth is known I leave all options open.  I know that may not be a popular stance anymore, and that's okay.  I'm not afraid to be a lonely monkey from time to time.

So far, nobody...no answers.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #788 12/31/08 -
Post by: Tamikosmom on December 31, 2008, 01:22:20 PM
The domino effect in regards to accountability for what happened on the morning of May 30, 2005 as well as the persuing coverup dictates that justice will never be forthcoming for Natalee Holloway from an Aruban or Dutch courtroom.

Pressure has to be brought upon Aruba by the FBI if the family is to be afforded a measure of closure.  The truth regarding the contents of the cage/trap needs to be exposed and ...

Kyle ... your words imply that you could be the catalyst to a positive end.[/color]  Doing right is not always easy but ... it is right.

Janet

++++++++

'Scarborough Country' for July 14
updated 8:45 a.m. PT, Fri., July. 15, 2005


JUG TWITTY, NATALEE HOLLOWAY'S STEPFATHER: Beth and I have been through this emotional roller coaster. And all we want is Natalee, whether she's alive or dead. We want to bring her back to the United States, and we'll leave and they can do whatever they want to do.

http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/8551824/


'The Abrams Report' for July 1
updated 7:47 a.m. PT, Wed., July. 6, 2005


BETH HOLLOWAY TWITTY, NATALEE HOLLOWAY'S MOTHER:  We cannot forget to demand and expect to have Natalee.  Natalee deserves to return to her country.  She deserves it, and everyone knows it, Martin, every single person.  Every single person knows that.  They know it.

http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/8485029/


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #788 12/31/08 -
Post by: AZSunny on December 31, 2008, 01:22:46 PM
ldstlou.Did Kyle turn over all pertinent information over to the Holloway family as well as the FBI in a timely manner?Yes or No?

See that's not specific enough, I want to know precisely WHEN KYLE turned over the information he thought he had to Beth/Jug and the FBI.  I would also want to know why KYLE was negotiating with the networks to gain financially from this prior to turning over what he thought he had to the family and FBI.

I understand Klaas.Ldstlou?WHEN did Kyle turn all pertinent information over to the FBI as well as the Holloway family?

I'm sorry guys - she's not going to be able to answer that, because it never happened.

I would like to see the creative dates that she may try and come back with though.  ::MonkeyRoll::  And see just how they correspond with what/when/how we (including Kyle) know transpired.

Thanx Jen.That is the point!If Kyle didn't turn information over in a timely manner and has mislead people.Why defend him?Let him speak for himself!

ok...in one post you ask me questions about when and what was turned over and in the next you say don't answer for him.

So you either do not know, or, you are afraid to say because of what it will reveal.  I think we know when it was turned over.  Way after the fact!!!


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #788 12/31/08 -
Post by: SunnyinTX on December 31, 2008, 01:23:16 PM

Lisa.....I didn't direct anything at you...please don't put words in my mouth.  You know me well enough to know that if I was directing this at you I would have said so. I am not known for being 'politically correct'.  I had an opportunity to read this entire thread this morning and I posted what I felt after reading it.  I don't know who I believe..I don't know what I believe...and reading this thread did nothing to help me.[/color]

Sorry Sunny, I was finishing up an online exam...and sorry for jumping the gun...feeling a bit ganged up on lately and a bit sensitive!!
Sorry I misread you post!!

And I think there is a lot of that misreading happening....while reading this morning there were many times I was tempted to respond....but decided it was best to  read and hope my questions would be answered. Some were and some weren't. But there was no sense in me adding to the ugliness I read among Monkeys towards each other.  Sometimes one has to repeat one's answers time and time again.....don't get on the defensive about it. ::MonkeyWink:: Like I said...we all want the same thing....the truth....


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #788 12/31/08 -
Post by: texasmom on December 31, 2008, 01:23:35 PM
I don't believe for one second that Tim Miller was removed from the Persistence because he was an emotional liability.  Yea that's what I was told.  pppfffttt.

hahahahahahaha....that is a hoot!  yes Tim is emotional..passionate about what he does....but his emotion could only be called a liability by someone who was intimated by him.... ::MonkeyWink::

Yes, I agree.  


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #788 12/31/08 -
Post by: Blonde on December 31, 2008, 01:29:12 PM
ldstlou I wish you would re-think everything you have been told.  Search members for Kermit, Kyle, Tamikosmom, wingnut, jen3560.  Read all their posts.  They are not lying.  JMHO  you have been mis-lead.
IMO Jug only know's what he has been told.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #788 12/31/08 -
Post by: Tamikosmom on December 31, 2008, 01:31:02 PM

Was Kyle not BANNED from Freebirds?Why?

I do not know but maybe ... just maybe ... threats of litigation had something to do with Kyle being banned from the Natalee's Freebird's site.

Janet

+++++


Sent to me by Natalee's Freebirds:

Please feel free (if you'd like) to post this at your board.
 
During the journey of the Persistence to Aruba, Kyle reached out and emailed with us.  During that time, one of the questions posed to him was regarding protocol if/when Natalee's remains were found.
 
Kyle's response was that he was unsure, but felt that would be settled before the search began.
 
The cautions were given to him about the lack of integrity on the part of Aruba's law enforcement, prosecutor's office, and its judiciary.
 
Contact with Kyle continued throughout the duration of the search by the Persistence.
 
Once back home, Kyle asked us for our help.  He was very concerned about the activities that transpired during their search - specifically surrounding the find of the fishing cage and its contents.  Kyle wanted our help in presenting this information in a factual way, to then be given to Natalee's family. 
 
This was March 18, 2008.  At that time, Kyle assured us he had just recently sent the images from the Dec 30th and Jan 7th dives to the FBI, but had never received a response from them.
 
We later found that to be false.
 
Also at that time, Beth's brother saw the images Kyle had shared with us - but none of the detail he shared later.

We compiled the images Kyle presented us, along with his opinions and the facts surrounding the sequence of events regarding that fishing cage.  Kyle stated he would be getting in touch with Beth Holloway.
 
We later found out that never happened.

At this time, Kyle shared with us the broadcast networks he had approached in February, in an attempt to sell these images to the highest bidder.
 
This didn't concern us greatly at that time - as we were under the impression US law enforcement and Natalee's family had already been made aware of their find.
 
Approximately May 2008 Kyle began dodging questions for details (we had asked for names of Aruban police and divers to be included in our documentation of these events), hedging on moving forward with this, and then he completely disappeared from our board.
 
During that time, we learned Kyle had never contacted Beth, or Dave, or the FBI with this information.
 
We put our original plan into motion - that of presenting this information in a clear and concise manner, and we sent it to Beth Holloway.
 
Beth was disturbed, needed time to digest the information, and wanted to share it with someone she trusts.
 
When Tim Miller was returning to Aruba this past fall, Beth gave us permission to release this information publicly.
 
At that point, we gave it to John Kelly, Carmen Adams with the FBI, and got it ready for public consumption.
 
The next step was to publish this information at our blog.
 
One of our members felt we were betraying Kyle in doing so, contacted him, and he re-surfaced at our site with threats of litigation against us - stating this was his "intellectual property" and we could not use it.
 
That of course concerned us greatly - as none of us could afford to be sued.
 
He also stated at that time, Luis Shaefer had just recently sold the rights of the video of these images to a broadcast company for the purposes of a documentary.
 
We contacted legal counsel and were advised to keep our distance from any Persistence crew member, in the face of potential obstruction/accessory charges.
 
At this point, one of our members decided to brace for the possibility of civil litigation, resigned from our membership to protect it from same, and posted what he knows to be factual at SM.
 
Kyle did tell us human remains were found in that fish cage.
 
Kyle did tell us about John Silvetti's intent to open an office on the island of Aruba, to enable him ease in conducting business in South America, and Aruba.
 
Kyle also told us of John's absolute refusal to give that fish cage and its contents any credence - before even it was inspected on Jan 7th.
 
Kyle told us in no uncertain terms that Tim Miller and Dateline were abruptly removed from the Persistence on Dec 30, resulting in only Persistence crew being aboard between that date and the Jan 7 dive of the Arubans.
 
Nothing that was posted at SM by kermit was incorrect, out of context, or in any way false.
 
Regards,
 
Former Natalee's Freebirds Administrator
Natalee and her family deserve justice - and we will not let up until they have it!




Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #788 12/31/08 -
Post by: jen3560 on December 31, 2008, 01:32:07 PM
Blonde,

You made a post in the last thread about Caps posting, and a lack of Aruban people on the meter.

Just wanted you to know there were others who noticed that as well.  On numerous occasions.  ::MonkeyCool::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #788 12/31/08 -
Post by: SunnyinTX on December 31, 2008, 01:32:41 PM
ldstlou.Did Kyle turn over all pertinent information over to the Holloway family as well as the FBI in a timely manner?Yes or No?

See that's not specific enough, I want to know precisely WHEN KYLE turned over the information he thought he had to Beth/Jug and the FBI.  I would also want to know why KYLE was negotiating with the networks to gain financially from this prior to turning over what he thought he had to the family and FBI.

I understand Klaas.Ldstlou?WHEN did Kyle turn all pertinent information over to the FBI as well as the Holloway family?

I'm sorry guys - she's not going to be able to answer that, because it never happened.

I would like to see the creative dates that she may try and come back with though.  ::MonkeyRoll::  And see just how they correspond with what/when/how we (including Kyle) know transpired.

Thanx Jen.That is the point!If Kyle didn't turn information over in a timely manner and has mislead people.Why defend him?Let him speak for himself!

ok...in one post you ask me questions about when and what was turned over and in the next you say don't answer for him.

So you either do not know, or, you are afraid to say because of what it will reveal.  I think we know when it was turned over.  Way after the fact!!!

Oh Hells Bells...Lisa if you know please answer...if you don't just say you don't know.

Monks......we ALL need to work together.........


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #788 12/31/08 -
Post by: jen3560 on December 31, 2008, 01:36:13 PM
KeeptheFaith and Janet,

After we discovered this information had been withheld from US authorities, we contacted legal counsel, and were advised to keep our distance from Persistence crew members and benefactors - that is when and why Kyle was banned.

That occurred the end of September.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #788 12/31/08 -
Post by: sharon on December 31, 2008, 01:37:04 PM

Funny how people look at things in different ways.  I never got the impression that Kermit felt as though she was single handedly doing anything.

Ldstlou - ask Dave Holloway how he feels about Mark Purcell then tell me if you agree with everything Dave Holloway says.  Reminder, the Persistence search was arranged by TES and Dave Holloway, who inAruba does Dave Holloway listen to?  Who is best friends with Mark Purcell?  That alone should raise a red flag.



Exactly klaas! Big Red Flag.

This has bothered me from the start

And where it could lead  ::MonkeyWaa::




Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #788 12/31/08 -
Post by: texasmom on December 31, 2008, 01:38:25 PM
Blonde,

You made a post in the last thread about Caps posting, and a lack of Aruban people on the meter.

Just wanted you to know there were others who noticed that as well.  On numerous occasions.  ::MonkeyCool::

Do you have any idea where the posts were coming from?  TIA


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #788 12/31/08 -
Post by: MumInOhio on December 31, 2008, 01:39:14 PM
Quote Jenn..

Mum,

If you look at the dates of those posts by Caps, versus the date he sent his email to Dave Holloway of "I know where she is" and including the post by Caps about all Dave needs to do is get some pumps to bring her home......

Well - you'll see that Caps was still jumping from pond to pond to pond at the time he was stating those things.

Then miraculously comes this "witness" that Caps kept saying over and over was needed.

Then all of a sudden it's the Monserrat pond - not any of the other two ponds Caps was discussing (those other ponds were still his focus when he emailed Dave).

Combine that with Hotshot claiming to be the one who put Caps and this "witness" in touch with John Silvetti.

Take that one step further, and look at Silvetti's utter lack of attention to that cage - to the point where he cussed at Kyle for trying to pursue the matter.
 
Then look at Hot Shot's posts about removing items from the cage.

Then look at Caps posts regarding a shoe and human remains in the pond......


Pardon...If I read Caps posts... ::MonkeyHaHa::

I have read Caps posts at least 10 times. I can find anything that Caps has posted in this Forum in a reasonable amount of time. When I get my computer back I will be able to find them a whole lot faster!

I have my own thoughts on Caps which I expressed some of months and months ago.

Please do not try and patronize me!

I have been questioning the bits and pieces that Kermit is using to back up her posts. They are out of context and since November if you had read my posts you would know I have been questioning it.

My post last night was directed to Kermit about this. She knows this...She reads my posts. I do not have a clue what anyone else, you, Muffy or 2NJ are referring to as I only looked at that part of Kermit's post that I have been questioning.

Are we clear on this now?


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #788 12/31/08 -
Post by: wingnut on December 31, 2008, 01:40:04 PM
The Freebirds waited for Kyle to do the right thing.  And waited.  And waited.  But it seems the right thing for Kyle is a network deal. 




Perhaps the Player is being played........   


::MonkeyHaHa::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #788 12/31/08 -
Post by: jen3560 on December 31, 2008, 01:41:07 PM
Blonde,

You made a post in the last thread about Caps posting, and a lack of Aruban people on the meter.

Just wanted you to know there were others who noticed that as well.  On numerous occasions.  ::MonkeyCool::

Do you have any idea where the posts were coming from?  TIA

No - sorry.  I would have no way of knowing that.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #788 12/31/08 -
Post by: ldstlou on December 31, 2008, 01:43:06 PM
ldstlou I wish you would re-think everything you have been told.  Search members for Kermit, Kyle, Tamikosmom, wingnut, jen3560.  Read all their posts.  They are not lying.  JMHO  you have been mis-lead.
IMO Jug only know's what he has been told.


ok...so Kermit knows more than Jug and Dave and Tim am I reading this correctly?


And she sure did state she single handily uncover the conspiracy.

The whole family and Tim Miller were all duped by Kyle and John Silvetti correct? But not old Kermit...she uncovered the whole plot. Good lawd. Not bad for a person who wasn't even there.



Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #788 12/31/08 -
Post by: wingnut on December 31, 2008, 01:43:09 PM

Was Kyle not BANNED from Freebirds?Why?

I do not know but maybe ... just maybe ... threats of litigation had something to do with Kyle being banned from the Natalee's Freebird's site.

Janet

+++++





Logic dictates...........

 ::MonkeyLaugh::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #788 12/31/08 -
Post by: SunnyinTX on December 31, 2008, 01:43:15 PM
ldstlou I wish you would re-think everything you have been told.  Search members for Kermit, Kyle, Tamikosmom, wingnut, jen3560.  Read all their posts.  They are not lying.  JMHO  you have been mis-lead.

Snoopy I have read the posts. The posts are copied and pasted from the Freebird's forum...taken out of context. I know what they are and I know what they all say by now. Because they were taken out of context, I went straight to the source and asked for an explanation. He responded openly and honestly in my opinion. I am not an idiot and don't believe I have been mislead.

However...when Kermit starts posting shoes and skulls being moved by John Silvetti from the cage to the pond and Lalas and me being a part of the grand conspiracy and "bubbles being burst" and single handily exposing the cover-up...THAT is suspicious to me.

Ok...I admit I am not as up on all things posted....but Lisa please explain to me if these are direct quotes from OE how are they taken out of context??

I know you FEEL he answered honestly and openly.............but in this case world how do we ever know that for sure?? No you are not an idiot...............but you need to leave open the POSSIBILITY that you might have been mislead.....at least keep an open mind about it....


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #788 12/31/08 -
Post by: Blonde on December 31, 2008, 01:43:54 PM
Blonde,

You made a post in the last thread about Caps posting, and a lack of Aruban people on the meter.

Just wanted you to know there were others who noticed that as well.  On numerous occasions.  ::MonkeyCool::
Thanks, also when this happend Klaas  wasn't on the fourm. hmmm


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #788 12/31/08 -
Post by: jen3560 on December 31, 2008, 01:44:17 PM
Mum,

I'm not the one being patronizing here.  I do believe that would be you.

I just tried to clear it up a bit, if I could.  That's why I mentioned specifically the DATES of those posts of Caps referring to this pond, that pond, and the other.  Then look at the DATE he sent the email to Dave.

Seems a handful of other monkeys noticed the same things Kermit had posted about - and had done so before Kermit posted about it.

I'm sorry if it's still unclear for you.



Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #788 12/31/08 -
Post by: Keepthefaith on December 31, 2008, 01:46:42 PM
KeeptheFaith and Janet,

After we discovered this information had been withheld from US authorities, we contacted legal counsel, and were advised to keep our distance from Persistence crew members and benefactors - that is when and why Kyle was banned.

That occurred the end of September.

I appreciate the effort from all Jen!I'm glad that Wingnut and yourself have come to the cage and helped clarify things to us over here at the cage and can answer any repetitive questions that we people "Not in the know" have.Thanx Jen..


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #788 12/31/08 -
Post by: MuffyBee on December 31, 2008, 01:47:18 PM
I am 10 pages back in the other thread, and forgive me if I am wrong, But Muffy and 2NJS are you saying I am a mole?
What the heck has got in to some of you?

 As for a flyby...I only just caught up and Kermit posted. My post from last night has been posted about before since November. Did either of you see the posts?

I asked Kermit questions which she did not answer after she was here 2 visits ago. She did not acknowledge my questions on her next questions.

She cut and pasted bits of posts from Shango for her posts. I checked and posted on this. More than once. She cheated to make her her point.

I joined a Private forum, because of the constant talk about this trap. Other things were happening we have been told  over and over to focus on the trap. No matter what else I posted about I very seldom got a response. As well as if you don't buy what some here are saying they treat you ugly.

Yesterday you welcomed 2 Newbies with open arms from a Private forum...But this is different...How!

I don't know what their motives for joining SM after all this time was, but as far as I am concerned I don't know either of them from a bar of soap...so they will both have to any respect from me!






Mum ~  I don't think you are a mole. Nothing has gotten in to me.  You posted, saying Kermit copied and pasted a post with Shango in it, and that you recognized the posts because you had worked with the Shango stuff so much.   I thought it interesting.  And I wondered if you had any other thoughts.  But you had left after the one post.  And I expressed that I hoped you would come back today and talk with us about it.  Do you  believe Kermit is trying to give false information and/or to mislead us.  And if so, why?  But only if you want to say.  I don't know why Kermit copied and pasted from Shango, if that is what she really did.  Was she trying to make a point, or to show us something?  Or was she trying to mislead?  Just wondering your take on it, since you recognized some of the posts from Shango and commented on that fact.  I don't know what your issue is with welcoming those that may be members in a private forum.  There are many here that are members of various forums and I don't do the behind the scenes things emailing and such so I don't know whom belongs to what.   If a poster is granted membership here, I will welcome them.  I have welcomed some who are still here posting, some I have welcomed got banned before the day was through.  Do you have a problem with posters that came last night and tried to explain what they understood was the truth?  Should they not be welcome?  Should  they not be allowed to post?  That isn't up to me, but to the admin.  My opinion is, if it will get us nearer to the truth and getting Natalee Holloway home, it's fine with me. 


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #788 12/31/08 -
Post by: jen3560 on December 31, 2008, 01:47:19 PM
ldstlou I wish you would re-think everything you have been told.  Search members for Kermit, Kyle, Tamikosmom, wingnut, jen3560.  Read all their posts.  They are not lying.  JMHO  you have been mis-lead.
IMO Jug only know's what he has been told.


ok...so Kermit knows more than Jug and Dave and Tim am I reading this correctly?


And she sure did state she single handily uncover the conspiracy.

The whole family and Tim Miller were all duped by Kyle and John Silvetti correct? But not old Kermit...she uncovered the whole plot. Good lawd. Not bad for a person who wasn't even there.



Um.  Jug, Dave and Tim were not on the board when Kyle revealed all of his information.  The pertinent info (most of it) was sent to BETH by us, along with an invitation to the board.  And then the same to JQK and the FBI.  So yes - I would have to say that those present at the time this information was shared probably do know a bit more about the details than those who were not present.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #788 12/31/08 -
Post by: Tamikosmom on December 31, 2008, 01:49:12 PM

ldstlou I wish you would re-think everything you have been told.  Search members for Kermit, Kyle, Tamikosmom, wingnut, jen3560.  Read all their posts.  They are not lying.  JMHO  you have been mis-lead.

Snoopy I have read the posts. The posts are copied and pasted from the Freebird's forum...taken out of context. I know what they are and I know what they all say by now. Because they were taken out of context, I went straight to the source and asked for an explanation. He responded openly and honestly in my opinion. I am not an idiot and don't believe I have been mislead.

However...when Kermit starts posting shoes and skulls being moved by John Silvetti from the cage to the pond and Lalas and me being a part of the grand conspiracy and "bubbles being burst" and single handily exposing the cover-up...THAT is suspicious to me.


Lou

In regards to this topic ... I stay focused on Kyle Kingman's own words ... NOTHING ELSE!

You are not a Natalee Freebird which implies that you were not privy to the words of Kyle Kingman's original posts.

Who/What causes you to believe that Kermit's submissions to Scared Monkeys were taking out of context in a way that was meant to deceive?

Think about it.  What would Kermit's motive be?  So much time and effort has been afforded by him/her in the cause of justice for Natalee Holloway and ... closure for the family.

Lou ... please think very carefully concerning your position on this topic.

Sincerely, Janet



Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #788 12/31/08 -
Post by: Blonde on December 31, 2008, 01:50:01 PM
Blonde,

You made a post in the last thread about Caps posting, and a lack of Aruban people on the meter.

Just wanted you to know there were others who noticed that as well.  On numerous occasions.  ::MonkeyCool::

Do you have any idea where the posts were coming from?  TIA

I could only tell you it was not Aruba
 I went to all the pages  started from the hightest  # and worked myself to #1
one was  2  ?Unknown IP'S none were Aruba and he was loged in, Not sure if he was posting.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #788 12/31/08 -
Post by: ldstlou on December 31, 2008, 01:51:07 PM
ldstlou I wish you would re-think everything you have been told.  Search members for Kermit, Kyle, Tamikosmom, wingnut, jen3560.  Read all their posts.  They are not lying.  JMHO  you have been mis-lead.

Snoopy I have read the posts. The posts are copied and pasted from the Freebird's forum...taken out of context. I know what they are and I know what they all say by now. Because they were taken out of context, I went straight to the source and asked for an explanation. He responded openly and honestly in my opinion. I am not an idiot and don't believe I have been mislead.

However...when Kermit starts posting shoes and skulls being moved by John Silvetti from the cage to the pond and Lalas and me being a part of the grand conspiracy and "bubbles being burst" and single handily exposing the cover-up...THAT is suspicious to me.

Ok...I admit I am not as up on all things posted....but Lisa please explain to me if these are direct quotes from OE how are they taken out of context??

I know you FEEL he answered honestly and openly.............but in this case world how do we ever know that for sure?? No you are not an idiot...............but you need to leave open the POSSIBILITY that you might have been mislead.....at least keep an open mind about it....

Sunny, I came here to post a translation of an article last month. Wreck says go read what Kermit posted...so I went and read it. Not knowing about the Freebirds or where she got them I was suspicious of posts that were copied and pasted out of context. So I called Jug, then I IM'ed Kyle and simply asked questions. They answered them for me. Kyle in detail and he answered the "letter" Jen posted to Jug too. I would say the guy has nothing to hide if he line by line posted his answers to the letter Jen wrote to Jug.

On the other hand, yesterday Kemit posts her "burst the bubble" post which claims John Silvetti took shoes and evidence from the cage and moved it to the pond and Lalas and I are in on the whole big conspiracy and it is so rediculous to me I can't believe it!


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #788 12/31/08 -
Post by: klaasend on December 31, 2008, 01:51:24 PM
Blonde,

You made a post in the last thread about Caps posting, and a lack of Aruban people on the meter.

Just wanted you to know there were others who noticed that as well.  On numerous occasions.  ::MonkeyCool::
Thanks, also when this happend Klaas  wasn't on the fourm. hmmm

??  What do you mean?  When did this happen?


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #788 12/31/08 -
Post by: Tamikosmom on December 31, 2008, 01:53:55 PM

Was Kyle not BANNED from Freebirds?Why?

I do not know but maybe ... just maybe ... threats of litigation had something to do with Kyle being banned from the Natalee's Freebird's site.

Janet

+++++





Logic dictates...........

 ::MonkeyLaugh::

IMO.

 ::MonkeyHaHa::

Janet



Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #788 12/31/08 -
Post by: Blonde on December 31, 2008, 01:54:20 PM
ldstlou I wish you would re-think everything you have been told.  Search members for Kermit, Kyle, Tamikosmom, wingnut, jen3560.  Read all their posts.  They are not lying.  JMHO  you have been mis-lead.
IMO Jug only know's what he has been told.


ok...so Kermit knows more than Jug and Dave and Tim am I reading this correctly?


And she sure did state she single handily uncover the conspiracy.

The whole family and Tim Miller were all duped by Kyle and John Silvetti correct? But not old Kermit...she uncovered the whole plot. Good lawd. Not bad for a person who wasn't even there.



All that I know is that Beth saw the pictures ,she may not have shared this with Jug.

If you know Beth at all you know she does not give out information.



Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #788 12/31/08 -
Post by: jen3560 on December 31, 2008, 01:54:27 PM
Blonde,

You made a post in the last thread about Caps posting, and a lack of Aruban people on the meter.

Just wanted you to know there were others who noticed that as well.  On numerous occasions.  ::MonkeyCool::
Thanks, also when this happend Klaas  wasn't on the fourm. hmmm

??  What do you mean?  When did this happen?

I'm not sure if Blonde kept the dates or not - but I'm sure I can find them if she didn't.

Caps was here, signed in (and Blonde, I think you're right - he didn't post) but there was not a single person from Aruba showing up on the site meter.

I know of one person who watched for several days that week specifically for that purpose.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #788 12/31/08 -
Post by: ldstlou on December 31, 2008, 01:54:47 PM
ldstlou I wish you would re-think everything you have been told.  Search members for Kermit, Kyle, Tamikosmom, wingnut, jen3560.  Read all their posts.  They are not lying.  JMHO  you have been mis-lead.
IMO Jug only know's what he has been told.


ok...so Kermit knows more than Jug and Dave and Tim am I reading this correctly?


And she sure did state she single handily uncover the conspiracy.

The whole family and Tim Miller were all duped by Kyle and John Silvetti correct? But not old Kermit...she uncovered the whole plot. Good lawd. Not bad for a person who wasn't even there.



Um.  Jug, Dave and Tim were not on the board when Kyle revealed all of his information.  The pertinent info (most of it) was sent to BETH by us, along with an invitation to the board.  And then the same to JQK and the FBI.  So yes - I would have to say that those present at the time this information was shared probably do know a bit more about the details than those who were not present.

so you are saying Beth, the FBI and JQK all believe in your conspiracy theory correct?


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #788 12/31/08 -
Post by: texasmom on December 31, 2008, 01:58:27 PM
Blonde,

You made a post in the last thread about Caps posting, and a lack of Aruban people on the meter.

Just wanted you to know there were others who noticed that as well.  On numerous occasions.  ::MonkeyCool::

Do you have any idea where the posts were coming from?  TIA

I could only tell you it was not Aruba
 I went to all the pages  started from the hightest  # and worked myself to #1
one was ?Unknown none were Aruba and he was loged in, Not sure if he was posting.


Thanks Blonde.   ::MonkeyCool::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #788 12/31/08 -
Post by: klaasend on December 31, 2008, 01:58:37 PM
Blonde,

You made a post in the last thread about Caps posting, and a lack of Aruban people on the meter.

Just wanted you to know there were others who noticed that as well.  On numerous occasions.  ::MonkeyCool::
Thanks, also when this happend Klaas  wasn't on the fourm. hmmm

??  What do you mean?  When did this happen?

I checked Capslock's posts in May 2008 and his most recent and both are Setar which is Aruba.  I do not doubt that Capslock is in Aruba.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #788 12/31/08 -
Post by: Tamikosmom on December 31, 2008, 02:00:50 PM

Ldstlou - ask Dave Holloway how he feels about Mark Purcell then tell me if you agree with everything Dave Holloway says.  Reminder, the Persistence search was arranged by TES and Dave Holloway, who inAruba does Dave Holloway listen to?  Who is best friends with Mark Purcell?  That alone should raise a red flag.



 ::MonkeyShocked::

 ::MonkeyShocked::



Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #788 12/31/08 -
Post by: ldstlou on December 31, 2008, 02:00:50 PM
ldstlou I wish you would re-think everything you have been told.  Search members for Kermit, Kyle, Tamikosmom, wingnut, jen3560.  Read all their posts.  They are not lying.  JMHO  you have been mis-lead.
IMO Jug only know's what he has been told.


ok...so Kermit knows more than Jug and Dave and Tim am I reading this correctly?


And she sure did state she single handily uncover the conspiracy.

The whole family and Tim Miller were all duped by Kyle and John Silvetti correct? But not old Kermit...she uncovered the whole plot. Good lawd. Not bad for a person who wasn't even there.



Um.  Jug, Dave and Tim were not on the board when Kyle revealed all of his information.  The pertinent info (most of it) was sent to BETH by us, along with an invitation to the board.  And then the same to JQK and the FBI.  So yes - I would have to say that those present at the time this information was shared probably do know a bit more about the details than those who were not present.

so you are saying Beth, the FBI and JQK all believe in your conspiracy theory correct?

So now everyone has the info...Dave, Beth, FBI, JQK...so do they agree with Kermit's theory?


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #788 12/31/08 -
Post by: MumInOhio on December 31, 2008, 02:01:31 PM
Mum,

I wondered how you were able to put names to posters here that Kermit alluded to.  I said I had the equation wrong and mentioned an underground thing I was not privy to...a reference hinting to the private forum. 

The mole question popped into my mind after the underground statement (thinking of the defunct TV show), and not specifically directed at you...., and no insult was intended.     


Thanks 2NJS...I apologize...



Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #788 12/31/08 -
Post by: SunnyinTX on December 31, 2008, 02:02:01 PM


Sunny, I came here to post a translation of an article last month. Wreck says go read what Kermit posted...so I went and read it. Not knowing about the Freebirds or where she got them I was suspicious of posts that were copied and pasted out of context. So I called Jug, then I IM'ed Kyle and simply asked questions. They answered them for me. Kyle in detail and he answered the "letter" Jen posted to Jug too. I would say the guy has nothing to hide if he line by line posted his answers to the letter Jen wrote to Jug.

On the other hand, yesterday Kermit posts her "burst the bubble" post which claims John Silvetti took shoes and evidence from the cage and moved it to the pond and Lalas and I are in on the whole big conspiracy and it is so rediculous to me I can't believe it!

OK...I am going to have to go back further and read what you are referring to. I will state as far as you and/or Lala's being a willing part of a conspiracy is laughable. I hope what was meant was perhaps Kermit feels you were both mislead and/or given misleading or incorrect information.  I will say that Kyle may have to be covering his ass and you might want to not believe his words as gospel. IIRC you and discussed Kyle early on and I told you then I was leery of him, not understanding WHY he felt the need to go to message boards.  I felt it was improper for him to reveal anything about the search publically. If he had any doubts or was confused about things or events IMO he should take it to the FBI. I still feel that way. I think it is stupid for him to be telling you or anyone, anything via IM or email...he doesn't know you or anyone else from Adam. So I do question why he would do that?


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #788 12/31/08 -
Post by: Blonde on December 31, 2008, 02:03:21 PM
Blonde,

You made a post in the last thread about Caps posting, and a lack of Aruban people on the meter.

Just wanted you to know there were others who noticed that as well.  On numerous occasions.  ::MonkeyCool::
Thanks, also when this happend Klaas  wasn't on the fourm. hmmm

??  What do you mean?  When did this happen?

I'm thinking when all this went down with kermit. He was loged in and their was NO Aruba on the site meter.
 No Aruba but looking into my notes 2 unknown  IP's


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #788 12/31/08 -
Post by: MumInOhio on December 31, 2008, 02:06:00 PM
Blonde,

You made a post in the last thread about Caps posting, and a lack of Aruban people on the meter.

Just wanted you to know there were others who noticed that as well.  On numerous occasions.  ::MonkeyCool::

I have about 20 in my documents. I have even sent klaas one. From Aruba.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #788 12/31/08 -
Post by: ldstlou on December 31, 2008, 02:08:00 PM
ldstlou I wish you would re-think everything you have been told.  Search members for Kermit, Kyle, Tamikosmom, wingnut, jen3560.  Read all their posts.  They are not lying.  JMHO  you have been mis-lead.
IMO Jug only know's what he has been told.


ok...so Kermit knows more than Jug and Dave and Tim am I reading this correctly?


And she sure did state she single handily uncover the conspiracy.

The whole family and Tim Miller were all duped by Kyle and John Silvetti correct? But not old Kermit...she uncovered the whole plot. Good lawd. Not bad for a person who wasn't even there.



Um.  Jug, Dave and Tim were not on the board when Kyle revealed all of his information.  The pertinent info (most of it) was sent to BETH by us, along with an invitation to the board.  And then the same to JQK and the FBI.  So yes - I would have to say that those present at the time this information was shared probably do know a bit more about the details than those who were not present.

so you are saying Beth, the FBI and JQK all believe in your conspiracy theory correct?

So now everyone has the info...Dave, Beth, FBI, JQK...so do they agree with Kermit's theory?

See...I am back to where I started from...and still after a month of going round and round I can not get an answer to this question.

It is clear everyone NOW has the information in question. Some think it was "uncovered" by Kermit, I am one of those who believe the FBI was not duped and had the info right way...regardless of which you believe..Jen has stated Beth, JQK and the FBI has all of the information..and have had it all for at the minimum of several months. So do they believe the "conspiracy theory"?


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #788 12/31/08 -
Post by: 2NJSons_Mom on December 31, 2008, 02:08:25 PM
Mum,

I wondered how you were able to put names to posters here that Kermit alluded to.  I said I had the equation wrong and mentioned an underground thing I was not privy to...a reference hinting to the private forum. 

The mole question popped into my mind after the underground statement (thinking of the defunct TV show), and not specifically directed at you...., and no insult was intended.     


Thanks 2NJS...I apologize...



No need for that....we've had a mutual respect as posters here, and I read all of your posts and knew when you had questions.  I did not always follow very well (S&S), unfortunately, but it didn't keep me from trying. 


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #788 12/31/08 -
Post by: Anna on December 31, 2008, 02:09:43 PM
Blonde,

You made a post in the last thread about Caps posting, and a lack of Aruban people on the meter.

Just wanted you to know there were others who noticed that as well.  On numerous occasions.  ::MonkeyCool::
Thanks, also when this happend Klaas  wasn't on the fourm. hmmm

??  What do you mean?  When did this happen?

Sometimes when CLW was logged in or posting, there was nobody from Aruba on the sitemeter.

I always supposed he could have been using Anonymouse or some sort of cloaking technique but did find it interesting.

I noticed it as well.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #788 12/31/08 -
Post by: Blonde on December 31, 2008, 02:10:06 PM
Blonde,

You made a post in the last thread about Caps posting, and a lack of Aruban people on the meter.

Just wanted you to know there were others who noticed that as well.  On numerous occasions.  ::MonkeyCool::
Thanks, also when this happend Klaas  wasn't on the fourm. hmmm

??  What do you mean?  When did this happen?

I'm not sure if Blonde kept the dates or not - but I'm sure I can find them if she didn't.

Caps was here, signed in (and Blonde, I think you're right - he didn't post) but there was not a single person from Aruba showing up on the site meter.

I know of one person who watched for several days that week specifically for that purpose.

I did for a few days also,  if you don't post you IP doesn't show up on you posts to the admins.
I have been an Admin to many Natalee sites one that was  even cripted  PROTECTED

Now he won't even log in, if he's on to this.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #788 12/31/08 -
Post by: klaasend on December 31, 2008, 02:10:46 PM
Blonde,

You made a post in the last thread about Caps posting, and a lack of Aruban people on the meter.

Just wanted you to know there were others who noticed that as well.  On numerous occasions.  ::MonkeyCool::
Thanks, also when this happend Klaas  wasn't on the fourm. hmmm

??  What do you mean?  When did this happen?

I'm thinking when all this went down with kermit. He was loged in and their was NO Aruba on the site meter.
 No Aruba but looking into my notes 2 unknown  IP's


The site meter only shows the last 100 people on.  I know for a fact I am on and I know where I live.  I am not showing up on the site meter right now.  You cannot go by that.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #788 12/31/08 -
Post by: Tamikosmom on December 31, 2008, 02:10:56 PM
Well ... life outside the computer room beckons!

As tradition dictates ... dinner, movie and board games with friends is where it is at this evening.  The secret is out.  Mr. and Mrs. Tamikosmom are real party animals.

 ::cartwheel::

HAPPY NEW YEARS MONKEYS!!  HAPPY NEW YEARS ZOOKEEPERS!!

Janet
11:10 AM PT


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #788 12/31/08 -
Post by: Blonde on December 31, 2008, 02:12:57 PM
Blonde,

You made a post in the last thread about Caps posting, and a lack of Aruban people on the meter.

Just wanted you to know there were others who noticed that as well.  On numerous occasions.  ::MonkeyCool::

I have about 20 in my documents. I have even sent klaas one. From Aruba.


You can get a progran hide the IP and it will show everyone your posting from where ever you want. I know this for a fact, because I had it on my old computer.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #788 12/31/08 -
Post by: truthseeker2 on December 31, 2008, 02:13:17 PM

The site meter only shows the last 100 people on.  I know for a fact I am on and I know where I live.  I am not showing up on the site meter right now.  You cannot go by that.

Yes, that is what I was hoping someone would explain.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #788 12/31/08 -
Post by: Nut44x4 on December 31, 2008, 02:13:25 PM
My head is  :shaking: and :shaking2: and it hurts, a lot.  :smt017 All I want is Justice for Natalee  :gaah: There are many things posted in the past couple of days that I need to read over again. Perhaps then my head won't hurt.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #788 12/31/08 -
Post by: ldstlou on December 31, 2008, 02:13:34 PM
ldstlou I wish you would re-think everything you have been told.  Search members for Kermit, Kyle, Tamikosmom, wingnut, jen3560.  Read all their posts.  They are not lying.  JMHO  you have been mis-lead.
IMO Jug only know's what he has been told.


ok...so Kermit knows more than Jug and Dave and Tim am I reading this correctly?


And she sure did state she single handily uncover the conspiracy.

The whole family and Tim Miller were all duped by Kyle and John Silvetti correct? But not old Kermit...she uncovered the whole plot. Good lawd. Not bad for a person who wasn't even there.



Um.  Jug, Dave and Tim were not on the board when Kyle revealed all of his information.  The pertinent info (most of it) was sent to BETH by us, along with an invitation to the board.  And then the same to JQK and the FBI.  So yes - I would have to say that those present at the time this information was shared probably do know a bit more about the details than those who were not present.

so you are saying Beth, the FBI and JQK all believe in your conspiracy theory correct?

So now everyone has the info...Dave, Beth, FBI, JQK...so do they agree with Kermit's theory?

See...I am back to where I started from...and still after a month of going round and round I can not get an answer to this question.

It is clear everyone NOW has the information in question. Some think it was "uncovered" by Kermit, I am one of those who believe the FBI was not duped and had the info right way...regardless of which you believe..Jen has stated Beth, JQK and the FBI has all of the information..and have had it all for at the minimum of several months. So do they believe the "conspiracy theory"?

ok then...a month of going back and forth and still my initial question is not answered.



Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #788 12/31/08 -
Post by: klaasend on December 31, 2008, 02:14:41 PM
ldstlou I wish you would re-think everything you have been told.  Search members for Kermit, Kyle, Tamikosmom, wingnut, jen3560.  Read all their posts.  They are not lying.  JMHO  you have been mis-lead.
IMO Jug only know's what he has been told.


ok...so Kermit knows more than Jug and Dave and Tim am I reading this correctly?


And she sure did state she single handily uncover the conspiracy.

The whole family and Tim Miller were all duped by Kyle and John Silvetti correct? But not old Kermit...she uncovered the whole plot. Good lawd. Not bad for a person who wasn't even there.



Um.  Jug, Dave and Tim were not on the board when Kyle revealed all of his information.  The pertinent info (most of it) was sent to BETH by us, along with an invitation to the board.  And then the same to JQK and the FBI.  So yes - I would have to say that those present at the time this information was shared probably do know a bit more about the details than those who were not present.

so you are saying Beth, the FBI and JQK all believe in your conspiracy theory correct?

So now everyone has the info...Dave, Beth, FBI, JQK...so do they agree with Kermit's theory?

See...I am back to where I started from...and still after a month of going round and round I can not get an answer to this question.

It is clear everyone NOW has the information in question. Some think it was "uncovered" by Kermit, I am one of those who believe the FBI was not duped and had the info right way...regardless of which you believe..Jen has stated Beth, JQK and the FBI has all of the information..and have had it all for at the minimum of several months. So do they believe the "conspiracy theory"?

Kermit never said she uncovered anything she simply had the balls to post it in the open here at SM. 


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #788 12/31/08 -
Post by: 2NJSons_Mom on December 31, 2008, 02:15:08 PM


Enjoy, Janet & don't over do the partying........Happy New Year  ::MonkeyHaHa::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #788 12/31/08 -
Post by: ldstlou on December 31, 2008, 02:17:04 PM
ldstlou I wish you would re-think everything you have been told.  Search members for Kermit, Kyle, Tamikosmom, wingnut, jen3560.  Read all their posts.  They are not lying.  JMHO  you have been mis-lead.
IMO Jug only know's what he has been told.


ok...so Kermit knows more than Jug and Dave and Tim am I reading this correctly?


And she sure did state she single handily uncover the conspiracy.

The whole family and Tim Miller were all duped by Kyle and John Silvetti correct? But not old Kermit...she uncovered the whole plot. Good lawd. Not bad for a person who wasn't even there.



Um.  Jug, Dave and Tim were not on the board when Kyle revealed all of his information.  The pertinent info (most of it) was sent to BETH by us, along with an invitation to the board.  And then the same to JQK and the FBI.  So yes - I would have to say that those present at the time this information was shared probably do know a bit more about the details than those who were not present.

so you are saying Beth, the FBI and JQK all believe in your conspiracy theory correct?

So now everyone has the info...Dave, Beth, FBI, JQK...so do they agree with Kermit's theory?

See...I am back to where I started from...and still after a month of going round and round I can not get an answer to this question.

It is clear everyone NOW has the information in question. Some think it was "uncovered" by Kermit, I am one of those who believe the FBI was not duped and had the info right way...regardless of which you believe..Jen has stated Beth, JQK and the FBI has all of the information..and have had it all for at the minimum of several months. So do they believe the "conspiracy theory"?

Kermit never said she uncovered anything she simply had the balls to post it in the open here at SM. 

her exact words were she "single handily" uncovered the conspiracy, she certainly did say that. I even brought it up yesterday to her...now she claims she was "only joking".


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #788 12/31/08 -
Post by: Keepthefaith on December 31, 2008, 02:17:22 PM
If it is true that Kyle did not turn information over in a timely manner(Freebirds did),was attempting to broker with TV networks,as well as mislead people.What is the reasoning of defending him??

To clarify.I believe Kyle did those thing until proven otherwise!I can't defend someone when the foundation of their character is broken.JMOO


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #788 12/31/08 -
Post by: Anna on December 31, 2008, 02:17:48 PM
How can "everyone" have the information now if we don't even know what ALE took from the cage?  There is more than just the photos. 


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #788 12/31/08 -
Post by: truthseeker2 on December 31, 2008, 02:19:27 PM
My head is  :shaking: and :shaking2: and it hurts, a lot.  :smt017 All I want is Justice for Natalee  :gaah: There are many things posted in the past couple of days that I need to read over again. Perhaps then my head won't hurt.

 ::MonkeyLaugh::

I hope reading it all again does not compund the symptoms!


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #788 12/31/08 -
Post by: MumInOhio on December 31, 2008, 02:19:40 PM
Mum,

I'm not the one being patronizing here.  I do believe that would be you.

I just tried to clear it up a bit, if I could.  That's why I mentioned specifically the DATES of those posts of Caps referring to this pond, that pond, and the other.  Then look at the DATE he sent the email to Dave.

Seems a handful of other monkeys noticed the same things Kermit had posted about - and had done so before Kermit posted about it.

I'm sorry if it's still unclear for you.



It is very clear to me and has been for many months. Probably before it became clear to you. Janet states she was alone when she doubted Caps...Go back before that in Shango and read, please. Try around April, probably the middle.  I have a heap of emails that go back much earlier than that.

Just because you think you are right does not make it so. My theory may not be correct either, but please don't act like this is all some new breakthrough!

I am familiar with the dates as well, Thank You. I read what is posted.

Now I will go back to my research which I have been working on as soon as I finish catching up.

As far as I can see this cage business is the diversion. JMO 
.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #788 12/31/08 -
Post by: ldstlou on December 31, 2008, 02:20:09 PM
If it is true that Kyle did not turn information over in a timely manner(Freebirds did),was attempting to broker with TV networks,as well as mislead people.What is the reasoning of defending him??

To clarify.I believe Kyle did those thing until proven otherwise!I can't defend someone when the foundation of their character is broken.JMOO

and I don't believe the information was not turned over to the FBI right away.

Regardless, as Jen states, Beth, JQK and the FBI have the info Kyle posted at Freebirds now. So what is their take on it?


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #788 12/31/08 -
Post by: Anna on December 31, 2008, 02:21:04 PM
Lisa, didn't you post that you told Jug SM was saying the family had the remains or knew they were in the cage and concealing this fact?

It upsets me that people contact the family with information that is incorrect or taken out of context.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #788 12/31/08 -
Post by: truthseeker2 on December 31, 2008, 02:22:45 PM
Well ... life outside the computer room beckons!

As tradition dictates ... dinner, movie and board games with friends is where it is at this evening.  The secret is out.  Mr. and Mrs. Tamikosmom are real party animals.

 ::cartwheel::

HAPPY NEW YEARS MONKEYS!!  HAPPY NEW YEARS ZOOKEEPERS!!

Janet
11:10 AM PT

Sounds like the evening we have planned.  I plan to be on the champion ROOK team tonight!

(I will have my laptop close by with the forum up and running.  Each trip to refresh a drink will allow me a peek!  At least until all that refreshing of drinks dissipates my peeking capacity!)


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #788 12/31/08 -
Post by: klaasend on December 31, 2008, 02:22:51 PM
How can "everyone" have the information now if we don't even know what ALE took from the cage?  There is more than just the photos. 

Exactly


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #788 12/31/08 -
Post by: SunnyinTX on December 31, 2008, 02:24:05 PM
My head is  :shaking: and :shaking2: and it hurts, a lot.  :smt017 All I want is Justice for Natalee  :gaah: There are many things posted in the past couple of days that I need to read over again. Perhaps then my head won't hurt.

Oh believe me it will...I simply came on this morning to try and get caught up!  I just went and took 2 Aleve and got a glass of Jamaican Rum Coconut Creme on the rocks!...hell it's five o'clock somewhere!


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #788 12/31/08 -
Post by: ldstlou on December 31, 2008, 02:25:12 PM
How can "everyone" have the information now if we don't even know what ALE took from the cage?  There is more than just the photos. 

Exactly

The information that Kyle shared with the Freebirds that Kermit felt compelled to share...is that a better way of stating it?

So in regrds to the information Kyle shared that Kermit felt compelled to post here...and that was according to jen given to Beth, JQK and the FBI...that information, what is the opinion of Beth, JQK and the FBI in regards to the info and the conspiracy theory?


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #788 12/31/08 -
Post by: Keepthefaith on December 31, 2008, 02:25:23 PM
If it is true that Kyle did not turn information over in a timely manner(Freebirds did),was attempting to broker with TV networks,as well as mislead people.What is the reasoning of defending him??

To clarify.I believe Kyle did those thing until proven otherwise!I can't defend someone when the foundation of their character is broken.JMOO

and I don't believe the information was not turned over to the FBI right away.

Regardless, as Jen states, Beth, JQK and the FBI have the info Kyle posted at Freebirds now. So what is their take on it?

Prove to me that the information was turned over by Kyle to the FBI,as well as the Holloway and what day??If someone else other than Kyle turned this information,after giving Kyle the opportunity and he chose not to.That is indefensable from my standpoint!Why defend him??


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #788 12/31/08 -
Post by: truthseeker2 on December 31, 2008, 02:26:11 PM
How can "everyone" have the information now if we don't even know what ALE took from the cage?  There is more than just the photos. 

You always ask great questions.  And this ranks right up there with some of your best.

Seems I remember a discussion some time back about DNA on the fabric sent to the FBI.  I assume that was not Natalee's DNA.  Right?


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #788 12/31/08 -
Post by: texasmom on December 31, 2008, 02:27:42 PM
Well ... life outside the computer room beckons!

As tradition dictates ... dinner, movie and board games with friends is where it is at this evening.  The secret is out.  Mr. and Mrs. Tamikosmom are real party animals.

 ::cartwheel::

HAPPY NEW YEARS MONKEYS!!  HAPPY NEW YEARS ZOOKEEPERS!!

Janet
11:10 AM PT

Have fun Janet!  And Happy New Year to you and yours!!!!   ::MonkeyDance::



Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #788 12/31/08 -
Post by: Keepthefaith on December 31, 2008, 02:28:02 PM
Mum,

I'm not the one being patronizing here.  I do believe that would be you.

I just tried to clear it up a bit, if I could.  That's why I mentioned specifically the DATES of those posts of Caps referring to this pond, that pond, and the other.  Then look at the DATE he sent the email to Dave.

Seems a handful of other monkeys noticed the same things Kermit had posted about - and had done so before Kermit posted about it.

I'm sorry if it's still unclear for you.



It is very clear to me and has been for many months. Probably before it became clear to you. Janet states she was alone when she doubted Caps...Go back before that in Shango and read, please. Try around April, probably the middle.  I have a heap of emails that go back much earlier than that.

Just because you think you are right does not make it so. My theory may not be correct either, but please don't act like this is all some new breakthrough!

I am familiar with the dates as well, Thank You. I read what is posted.

Now I will go back to my research which I have been working on as soon as I finish catching up.

As far as I can see this cage business is the diversion. JMO   
.

All of it or parts of it?


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #788 12/31/08 -
Post by: Anna on December 31, 2008, 02:28:46 PM
My head is  :shaking: and :shaking2: and it hurts, a lot.  :smt017 All I want is Justice for Natalee  :gaah: There are many things posted in the past couple of days that I need to read over again. Perhaps then my head won't hurt.

Oh believe me it will...I simply came on this morning to try and get caught up!  I just went and took 2 Aleve and got a glass of Jamaican Rum Coconut Creme on the rocks!...hell it's five o'clock somewhere!


Well, I have always thought for myself on everything concerning Natalee's disappearance and guess I will just continue on my journey in this manner.  I read, think and apply and go from there but this is getting to be a battle of egos, IMO.

My #1 son brought me a bottle of Glenlivet Scotch... those airport gifts can have advantages, lol.  If I am on here later I may well be BUI so am giving fair warning, lol.  The more I read the more tempting the scotch becomes.


.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #788 12/31/08 -
Post by: klaasend on December 31, 2008, 02:29:17 PM
How can "everyone" have the information now if we don't even know what ALE took from the cage?  There is more than just the photos. 

Exactly

The information that Kyle shared with the Freebirds that Kermit felt compelled to share...is that a better way of stating it?

So in regrds to the information Kyle shared that Kermit felt compelled to post here...and that was according to jen given to Beth, JQK and the FBI...that information, what is the opinion of Beth, JQK and the FBI in regards to the info and the conspiracy theory?

I couldn't tell you because I've never felt a need to directly contact the family members.  You see, I've always felt they have enough on their plates without having forum members contact them all the time. I also wouldn't call it a conspiracy theory.  I would call it more greed and the family being used once again.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #788 12/31/08 -
Post by: ldstlou on December 31, 2008, 02:29:26 PM
If it is true that Kyle did not turn information over in a timely manner(Freebirds did),was attempting to broker with TV networks,as well as mislead people.What is the reasoning of defending him??

To clarify.I believe Kyle did those thing until proven otherwise!I can't defend someone when the foundation of their character is broken.JMOO

and I don't believe the information was not turned over to the FBI right away.

Regardless, as Jen states, Beth, JQK and the FBI have the info Kyle posted at Freebirds now. So what is their take on it?

Prove to me that the information was turned over by Kyle to the FBI,as well as the Holloway and what day??If someone else other than Kyle turned this information,after giving Kyle the opportunity and he chose not to.That is indefensable from my standpoint!Why defend him??

I don't have to prove anything to you.
Assume I am wrong if it makes you feel better...and Kermit saved the day and uncovered the "conspiracy" and handed everything over to the proper authorities as she states..so what is the end result? Do Beth, JQK and the FBI buy Kermit's theory....jeez...bottom line if kermit can prove to me Beth, JQK and the FBI are on board with the theory...excluding Lalas and I of course being in on it... ::MonkeyConfused:: ...then you might convince me.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #788 12/31/08 -
Post by: truthseeker2 on December 31, 2008, 02:29:48 PM
My head is  :shaking: and :shaking2: and it hurts, a lot.  :smt017 All I want is Justice for Natalee  :gaah: There are many things posted in the past couple of days that I need to read over again. Perhaps then my head won't hurt.

Oh believe me it will...I simply came on this morning to try and get caught up!  I just went and took 2 Aleve and got a glass of Jamaican Rum Coconut Creme on the rocks!...hell it's five o'clock somewhere!

Not fair!!!  I want one.  My boss said No.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #788 12/31/08 -
Post by: ldstlou on December 31, 2008, 02:31:39 PM
How can "everyone" have the information now if we don't even know what ALE took from the cage?  There is more than just the photos. 

Exactly

The information that Kyle shared with the Freebirds that Kermit felt compelled to share...is that a better way of stating it?

So in regrds to the information Kyle shared that Kermit felt compelled to post here...and that was according to jen given to Beth, JQK and the FBI...that information, what is the opinion of Beth, JQK and the FBI in regards to the info and the conspiracy theory?

I couldn't tell you because I've never felt a need to directly contact the family members.  You see, I've always felt they have enough on their plates without having forum members contact them all the time. I also wouldn't call it a conspiracy theory.  I would call it more greed and the family being used once again.

ok...then what is the point of bringing it up at all if you don't want the answers...just want to slander the members of the Persistence...my point exactly.  Wasn't the whole point that Kermit saved the day and contacted Beth, the FBI and JQK???!! Hello?


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #788 12/31/08 -
Post by: Keepthefaith on December 31, 2008, 02:31:49 PM
If it is true that Kyle did not turn information over in a timely manner(Freebirds did),was attempting to broker with TV networks,as well as mislead people.What is the reasoning of defending him??

To clarify.I believe Kyle did those thing until proven otherwise!I can't defend someone when the foundation of their character is broken.JMOO

and I don't believe the information was not turned over to the FBI right away.

Regardless, as Jen states, Beth, JQK and the FBI have the info Kyle posted at Freebirds now. So what is their take on it?

Prove to me that the information was turned over by Kyle to the FBI,as well as the Holloway and what day??If someone else other than Kyle turned this information,after giving Kyle the opportunity and he chose not to.That is indefensable from my standpoint!Why defend him??

I don't have to prove anything to you.
Assume I am wrong if it makes you feel better...and Kermit saved the day and uncovered the "conspiracy" and handed everything over to the proper authorities as she states..so what is the end result? Do Beth, JQK and the FBI buy Kermit's theory....jeez...bottom line if kermit can prove to me Beth, JQK and the FBI are on board with the theory...excluding Lalas and I of course being in on it... ::MonkeyConfused:: ...then you might convince me.

Thanx ldstlou.I think you you know the answer.JMOO


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #788 12/31/08 -
Post by: ldstlou on December 31, 2008, 02:33:42 PM
If it is true that Kyle did not turn information over in a timely manner(Freebirds did),was attempting to broker with TV networks,as well as mislead people.What is the reasoning of defending him??

To clarify.I believe Kyle did those thing until proven otherwise!I can't defend someone when the foundation of their character is broken.JMOO

and I don't believe the information was not turned over to the FBI right away.

Regardless, as Jen states, Beth, JQK and the FBI have the info Kyle posted at Freebirds now. So what is their take on it?

Prove to me that the information was turned over by Kyle to the FBI,as well as the Holloway and what day??If someone else other than Kyle turned this information,after giving Kyle the opportunity and he chose not to.That is indefensable from my standpoint!Why defend him??

I don't have to prove anything to you.
Assume I am wrong if it makes you feel better...and Kermit saved the day and uncovered the "conspiracy" and handed everything over to the proper authorities as she states..so what is the end result? Do Beth, JQK and the FBI buy Kermit's theory....jeez...bottom line if kermit can prove to me Beth, JQK and the FBI are on board with the theory...excluding Lalas and I of course being in on it... ::MonkeyConfused:: ...then you might convince me.

Thanx ldstlou.I think you you know the answer.JMOO

are we back to I am in on the conspiracy?


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #788 12/31/08 -
Post by: truthseeker2 on December 31, 2008, 02:34:06 PM
My head is  :shaking: and :shaking2: and it hurts, a lot.  :smt017 All I want is Justice for Natalee  :gaah: There are many things posted in the past couple of days that I need to read over again. Perhaps then my head won't hurt.

Oh believe me it will...I simply came on this morning to try and get caught up!  I just went and took 2 Aleve and got a glass of Jamaican Rum Coconut Creme on the rocks!...hell it's five o'clock somewhere!


Well, I have always thought for myself on everything concerning Natalee's disappearance and guess I will just continue on my journey in this manner.  I read, think and apply and go from there but this is getting to be a battle of egos, IMO.

My #1 son brought me a bottle of Glenlivet Scotch... those airport gifts can have advantages, lol.  If I am on here later I may well be BUI so am giving fair warning, lol.  The more I read the more tempting the scotch becomes.


.

That BUI thing sounds like it could be fun, considering the last few weeks.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #788 12/31/08 -
Post by: Anna on December 31, 2008, 02:35:09 PM
How can "everyone" have the information now if we don't even know what ALE took from the cage?  There is more than just the photos. 

Exactly

The information that Kyle shared with the Freebirds that Kermit felt compelled to share...is that a better way of stating it?

So in regrds to the information Kyle shared that Kermit felt compelled to post here...and that was according to jen given to Beth, JQK and the FBI...that information, what is the opinion of Beth, JQK and the FBI in regards to the info and the conspiracy theory?

I couldn't tell you because I've never felt a need to directly contact the family members.  You see, I've always felt they have enough on their plates without having forum members contact them all the time. I also wouldn't call it a conspiracy theory.  I would call it more greed and the family being used once again.

ok...then what is the point of bringing it up at all if you don't want the answers...just want to slander the members of the Persistence...my point exactly.  Wasn't the whole point that Kermit saved the day and contacted Beth, the FBI and JQK???!! Hello?


No, that wasn't the point at all.  I am very uncomfortable with people contacting Natalee's family with such a poor grasp on the situation being discussed.

The contents of the cage, the stuff in the plastic bags would be far far more important than the photos and we don't have a clue what happened to that.  ALE apparently took it all away directly back into their own boat.  That's where any proof would be, not necessarily anything at all in the photos.  DNA would have been in the bags and we don't know what happened to those.

.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #788 12/31/08 -
Post by: klaasend on December 31, 2008, 02:35:11 PM
How can "everyone" have the information now if we don't even know what ALE took from the cage?  There is more than just the photos. 

Exactly

The information that Kyle shared with the Freebirds that Kermit felt compelled to share...is that a better way of stating it?

So in regrds to the information Kyle shared that Kermit felt compelled to post here...and that was according to jen given to Beth, JQK and the FBI...that information, what is the opinion of Beth, JQK and the FBI in regards to the info and the conspiracy theory?

I couldn't tell you because I've never felt a need to directly contact the family members.  You see, I've always felt they have enough on their plates without having forum members contact them all the time. I also wouldn't call it a conspiracy theory.  I would call it more greed and the family being used once again.

ok...then what is the point of bringing it up at all if you don't want the answers...just want to slander the members of the Persistence...my point exactly.  Wasn't the whole point that Kermit saved the day and contacted Beth, the FBI and JQK???!! Hello?

BS - and the answer is NO.  The point is KYLE posted information at Freebirds.  FREEBIRDS sent the information to Beth and the FBI whether it was via Kermit or not I couldn't tell you.  The information was sent by them after they found out that KYLE had lied to them.  Why did KYLE lie? 


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #788 12/31/08 -
Post by: klaasend on December 31, 2008, 02:37:38 PM
Anna - yes, you are so right.  If ALE divers took the contents of the trap, how do we know what was actuall there? 


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #788 12/31/08 -
Post by: MumInOhio on December 31, 2008, 02:38:36 PM
Muffy..
I am 10 pages back in the other thread, and forgive me if I am wrong, But Muffy and 2NJS are you saying I am a mole?
What the heck has got in to some of you?

 As for a flyby...I only just caught up and Kermit posted. My post from last night has been posted about before since November. Did either of you see the posts?

I asked Kermit questions which she did not answer after she was here 2 visits ago. She did not acknowledge my questions on her next questions.

She cut and pasted bits of posts from Shango for her posts. I checked and posted on this. More than once. She cheated to make her her point.

I joined a Private forum, because of the constant talk about this trap. Other things were happening we have been told  over and over to focus on the trap. No matter what else I posted about I very seldom got a response. As well as if you don't buy what some here are saying they treat you ugly.

Yesterday you welcomed 2 Newbies with open arms from a Private forum...But this is different...How!

I don't know what their motives for joining SM after all this time was, but as far as I am concerned I don't know either of them from a bar of soap...so they will both have to any respect from me!






Mum ~  I don't think you are a mole. Nothing has gotten in to me.  You posted, saying Kermit copied and pasted a post with Shango in it, and that you recognized the posts because you had worked with the Shango stuff so much.   I thought it interesting.  And I wondered if you had any other thoughts.  But you had left after the one post.  And I expressed that I hoped you would come back today and talk with us about it.  Do you  believe Kermit is trying to give false information and/or to mislead us.  And if so, why?  But only if you want to say.  I don't know why Kermit copied and pasted from Shango, if that is what she really did.  Was she trying to make a point, or to show us something?  Or was she trying to mislead?  Just wondering your take on it, since you recognized some of the posts from Shango and commented on that fact.  I don't know what your issue is with welcoming those that may be members in a private forum.  There are many here that are members of various forums and I don't do the behind the scenes things emailing and such so I don't know whom belongs to what.   If a poster is granted membership here, I will welcome them.  I have welcomed some who are still here posting, some I have welcomed got banned before the day was through.  Do you have a problem with posters that came last night and tried to explain what they understood was the truth?  Should they not be welcome?  Should  they not be allowed to post?  That isn't up to me, but to the admin.  My opinion is, if it will get us nearer to the truth and getting Natalee Holloway home, it's fine with me. 

Muffy...Kermit did this on her first post on this, I believe on November 13th. I have it all in my notes, but I will not be picking up my computer today it seems. I have posted about this. It bothers me. And I do not know why Kermit thought she needed to do it.

Yes, as far as I am concerned it is at the very least, misleading. I gave Kermit the benefit of the doubt and let it go, until she posted the same type thing last night. I also know that Kermit read my posts concerning this. What I would like to know is why Kermit felt it necessary to cut and paste bits and pieces, and out of context from posts in Shango to back up her posts. The only thing I can think of is that other posters keep saying that Kermit is backing up her posts. Technically she is.

Muffy, I am reading digs every day about Private Forums. Yet I guess it depends on which Private Forum you are a member of. I reserve judgement on all new posters, as I said they will earn my respect ...or not.

Time will tell how this all pans out, but it the meantime it is taking away my focus on what I should be researching. I do this for only one reason...I don't have any motive other than searching for the truth about Natalee.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #788 12/31/08 -
Post by: Anna on December 31, 2008, 02:38:42 PM
Lisa, didn't you post that you told Jug SM was saying the family had the remains or knew they were in the cage and concealing this fact?

It upsets me that people contact the family with information that is incorrect or taken out of context.


BUMP


.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #788 12/31/08 -
Post by: ldstlou on December 31, 2008, 02:39:01 PM
How can "everyone" have the information now if we don't even know what ALE took from the cage?  There is more than just the photos. 

Exactly

sorry you feel uncomfortable..but you don't dictate who I contact and what I have to say.

I misread the original post and corrected it...so move on Anna.

The information that Kyle shared with the Freebirds that Kermit felt compelled to share...is that a better way of stating it?

So in regrds to the information Kyle shared that Kermit felt compelled to post here...and that was according to jen given to Beth, JQK and the FBI...that information, what is the opinion of Beth, JQK and the FBI in regards to the info and the conspiracy theory?

I couldn't tell you because I've never felt a need to directly contact the family members.  You see, I've always felt they have enough on their plates without having forum members contact them all the time. I also wouldn't call it a conspiracy theory.  I would call it more greed and the family being used once again.

ok...then what is the point of bringing it up at all if you don't want the answers...just want to slander the members of the Persistence...my point exactly.  Wasn't the whole point that Kermit saved the day and contacted Beth, the FBI and JQK???!! Hello?


No, that wasn't the point at all.  I am very uncomfortable with people contacting Natalee's family with such a poor grasp on the situation being discussed.

The contents of the cage, the stuff in the plastic bags would be far far more important than the photos and we don't have a clue what happened to that.  ALE apparently took it all away directly back into their own boat.  That's where any proof would be, not necessarily anything at all in the photos.  DNA would have been in the bags and we don't know what happened to those.

.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #788 12/31/08 -
Post by: Keepthefaith on December 31, 2008, 02:39:34 PM
If it is true that Kyle did not turn information over in a timely manner(Freebirds did),was attempting to broker with TV networks,as well as mislead people.What is the reasoning of defending him??

To clarify.I believe Kyle did those thing until proven otherwise!I can't defend someone when the foundation of their character is broken.JMOO

and I don't believe the information was not turned over to the FBI right away.

Regardless, as Jen states, Beth, JQK and the FBI have the info Kyle posted at Freebirds now. So what is their take on it?

Prove to me that the information was turned over by Kyle to the FBI,as well as the Holloway and what day??If someone else other than Kyle turned this information,after giving Kyle the opportunity and he chose not to.That is indefensable from my standpoint!Why defend him??

I don't have to prove anything to you.
Assume I am wrong if it makes you feel better...and Kermit saved the day and uncovered the "conspiracy" and handed everything over to the proper authorities as she states..so what is the end result? Do Beth, JQK and the FBI buy Kermit's theory....jeez...bottom line if kermit can prove to me Beth, JQK and the FBI are on board with the theory...excluding Lalas and I of course being in on it... ::MonkeyConfused:: ...then you might convince me.

Thanx ldstlou.I think you you know the answer.JMOO

are we back to I am in on the conspiracy?

I stand with the Frog until you can prove the Frog wrong with logic,as well as facts!If you are in such close contact with Kyle have him send you an e-mail and break it all down for everyone!Again.I don't think he's gonna do that!I've said it before.If i'm wrong i will say it LOUD AND CLEAR and will apologize...Don't think it's gonna happen though."If" Natalee,and or anyone else was in that cage we'll never know.Why?


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #788 12/31/08 -
Post by: bastibro on December 31, 2008, 02:40:35 PM
How can "everyone" have the information now if we don't even know what ALE took from the cage?  There is more than just the photos. 

Exactly

The information that Kyle shared with the Freebirds that Kermit felt compelled to share...is that a better way of stating it?

So in regrds to the information Kyle shared that Kermit felt compelled to post here...and that was according to jen given to Beth, JQK and the FBI...that information, what is the opinion of Beth, JQK and the FBI in regards to the info and the conspiracy theory?

Nobody seems to know whom is on-line ldstlou.

Lets wait for Kermit to hop  in  ::MonkeyWink::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #788 12/31/08 -
Post by: ldstlou on December 31, 2008, 02:40:39 PM
Lisa, didn't you post that you told Jug SM was saying the family had the remains or knew they were in the cage and concealing this fact?

It upsets me that people contact the family with information that is incorrect or taken out of context.


BUMP


.

sorry you feel uncomfortable with who I contact Anna, but you don't dictate to me who I can speak to and when and what I can say.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #788 12/31/08 -
Post by: ldstlou on December 31, 2008, 02:42:22 PM
If it is true that Kyle did not turn information over in a timely manner(Freebirds did),was attempting to broker with TV networks,as well as mislead people.What is the reasoning of defending him??

To clarify.I believe Kyle did those thing until proven otherwise!I can't defend someone when the foundation of their character is broken.JMOO

and I don't believe the information was not turned over to the FBI right away.

Regardless, as Jen states, Beth, JQK and the FBI have the info Kyle posted at Freebirds now. So what is their take on it?

Prove to me that the information was turned over by Kyle to the FBI,as well as the Holloway and what day??If someone else other than Kyle turned this information,after giving Kyle the opportunity and he chose not to.That is indefensable from my standpoint!Why defend him??

I don't have to prove anything to you.
Assume I am wrong if it makes you feel better...and Kermit saved the day and uncovered the "conspiracy" and handed everything over to the proper authorities as she states..so what is the end result? Do Beth, JQK and the FBI buy Kermit's theory....jeez...bottom line if kermit can prove to me Beth, JQK and the FBI are on board with the theory...excluding Lalas and I of course being in on it... ::MonkeyConfused:: ...then you might convince me.

Thanx ldstlou.I think you you know the answer.JMOO

are we back to I am in on the conspiracy?

I stand with the Frog until you can prove the Frog wrong with logic,as well as facts!If you are in such close contact with Kyle have him send you an e-mail and break it all down for everyone!Again.I don't think he's gonna do that!I've said it before.If i'm wrong i will say it LOUD AND CLEAR and will apologize...Don't think it's gonna happen though."If" Natalee,and or anyone else was in that cage we'll never know.Why?

I told you about 5 times he already did that last night...sent one to myself and to Jug. I have no problems with his answers.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #788 12/31/08 -
Post by: Anna on December 31, 2008, 02:43:19 PM
Lisa, didn't you post that you told Jug SM was saying the family had the remains or knew they were in the cage and concealing this fact?

It upsets me that people contact the family with information that is incorrect or taken out of context.


BUMP


.

sorry you feel uncomfortable with who I contact Anna, but you don't dictate to me who I can speak to and when and what I can say.


You did post that you told Jug SM was saying the family had the remains when not one person here had said any such thing at all.  So are you saying you also have the right to misinform the family if it suits your purposes?



Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #788 12/31/08 -
Post by: Ree on December 31, 2008, 02:44:12 PM
Red told us recently that there are things going on behind the scenes and he'd tell us more as soon as he could.  I don't however, remember him telling us not to waste out time on a particular subject.  So Red, should we keep talking about the cage and move on?


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #788 12/31/08 -
Post by: klaasend on December 31, 2008, 02:44:44 PM
MUM - I don't like private invite only forums mostly because they end up causing problems.  I really don't like ChatnGrumble because I happen to know that Destiny and ******* are spreading lies about me and they are also both moderators at ChatnGrumble.  They are both either nuts or incredibly stupid but they are 100% wrong.  So if that is the private forum you belong to they will not get a "kudos" from me. 

You really do have to wonder about a private invite only forum that feels a need to have a secret hidey hole within the private invite only forum for the very special of the very special people.  ::MonkeyRoll::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #788 12/31/08 -
Post by: Keepthefaith on December 31, 2008, 02:45:27 PM
If it is true that Kyle did not turn information over in a timely manner(Freebirds did),was attempting to broker with TV networks,as well as mislead people.What is the reasoning of defending him??

To clarify.I believe Kyle did those thing until proven otherwise!I can't defend someone when the foundation of their character is broken.JMOO

and I don't believe the information was not turned over to the FBI right away.

Regardless, as Jen states, Beth, JQK and the FBI have the info Kyle posted at Freebirds now. So what is their take on it?

Prove to me that the information was turned over by Kyle to the FBI,as well as the Holloway and what day??If someone else other than Kyle turned this information,after giving Kyle the opportunity and he chose not to.That is indefensable from my standpoint!Why defend him??

I don't have to prove anything to you.
Assume I am wrong if it makes you feel better...and Kermit saved the day and uncovered the "conspiracy" and handed everything over to the proper authorities as she states..so what is the end result? Do Beth, JQK and the FBI buy Kermit's theory....jeez...bottom line if kermit can prove to me Beth, JQK and the FBI are on board with the theory...excluding Lalas and I of course being in on it... ::MonkeyConfused:: ...then you might convince me.

Thanx ldstlou.I think you you know the answer.JMOO

are we back to I am in on the conspiracy?

I stand with the Frog until you can prove the Frog wrong with logic,as well as facts!If you are in such close contact with Kyle have him send you an e-mail and break it all down for everyone!Again.I don't think he's gonna do that!I've said it before.If i'm wrong i will say it LOUD AND CLEAR and will apologize...Don't think it's gonna happen though."If" Natalee,and or anyone else was in that cage we'll never know.Why?

I told you about 5 times he already did that last night...sent one to myself and to Jug. I have no problems with his answers.

Prove the Frog wrong!I'm all ears.I'll be waiting!I for one moment don't believe any of the family members tells anyone everything regardless of "WHO" they are unless you are a spouse!


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #788 12/31/08 -
Post by: Ree on December 31, 2008, 02:45:54 PM
If it is true that Kyle did not turn information over in a timely manner(Freebirds did),was attempting to broker with TV networks,as well as mislead people.What is the reasoning of defending him??

To clarify.I believe Kyle did those thing until proven otherwise!I can't defend someone when the foundation of their character is broken.JMOO

and I don't believe the information was not turned over to the FBI right away.

Regardless, as Jen states, Beth, JQK and the FBI have the info Kyle posted at Freebirds now. So what is their take on it?

Prove to me that the information was turned over by Kyle to the FBI,as well as the Holloway and what day??If someone else other than Kyle turned this information,after giving Kyle the opportunity and he chose not to.That is indefensable from my standpoint!Why defend him??

I don't have to prove anything to you.
Assume I am wrong if it makes you feel better...and Kermit saved the day and uncovered the "conspiracy" and handed everything over to the proper authorities as she states..so what is the end result? Do Beth, JQK and the FBI buy Kermit's theory....jeez...bottom line if kermit can prove to me Beth, JQK and the FBI are on board with the theory...excluding Lalas and I of course being in on it... ::MonkeyConfused:: ...then you might convince me.

Thanx ldstlou.I think you you know the answer.JMOO

are we back to I am in on the conspiracy?

I stand with the Frog until you can prove the Frog wrong with logic,as well as facts!If you are in such close contact with Kyle have him send you an e-mail and break it all down for everyone!Again.I don't think he's gonna do that!I've said it before.If i'm wrong i will say it LOUD AND CLEAR and will apologize...Don't think it's gonna happen though."If" Natalee,and or anyone else was in that cage we'll never know.Why?

I told you about 5 times he already did that last night...sent one to myself and to Jug. I have no problems with his answers.

Isn't that kind of pointless?  The only people he'll address his answers to are two, who according to you have no interest in disproving anything he has to say.  Kyle is full of BS.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #788 12/31/08 -
Post by: Keepthefaith on December 31, 2008, 02:46:39 PM
MUM - I don't like private invite only forums mostly because they end up causing problems.  I really don't like ChatnGrumble because I happen to know that Destiny and ******* are spreading lies about me and they are also both moderators at ChatnGrumble.  They are both either nuts or incredibly stupid but they are 100% wrong.  So if that is the private forum you belong to they will not get a "kudos" from me. 

You really do have to wonder about a private invite only forum that feels a need to have a secret hidey hole within the private invite only forum for the very special of the very special people.  ::MonkeyRoll::

I agree 110%


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #788 12/31/08 -
Post by: ldstlou on December 31, 2008, 02:46:42 PM
How can "everyone" have the information now if we don't even know what ALE took from the cage?  There is more than just the photos. 

Exactly

The information that Kyle shared with the Freebirds that Kermit felt compelled to share...is that a better way of stating it?

So in regrds to the information Kyle shared that Kermit felt compelled to post here...and that was according to jen given to Beth, JQK and the FBI...that information, what is the opinion of Beth, JQK and the FBI in regards to the info and the conspiracy theory?

I couldn't tell you because I've never felt a need to directly contact the family members.  You see, I've always felt they have enough on their plates without having forum members contact them all the time. I also wouldn't call it a conspiracy theory.  I would call it more greed and the family being used once again.

ok...then what is the point of bringing it up at all if you don't want the answers...just want to slander the members of the Persistence...my point exactly.  Wasn't the whole point that Kermit saved the day and contacted Beth, the FBI and JQK???!! Hello?

BS - and the answer is NO.  The point is KYLE posted information at Freebirds.  FREEBIRDS sent the information to Beth and the FBI whether it was via Kermit or not I couldn't tell you.  The information was sent by them after they found out that KYLE had lied to them.  Why did KYLE lie? 

I thought the point was to expose the conspiracy. Why won't anyone address what Kermit said yesterday...that John Silvetti moved the contents of the trap to the pond and was working with the ALE to hide evidence that was in that trap. That my friend, in my humble opinion..is pure slander.
Then she went so far as to include Hotshot, Lalas, myself and Caps in her grand conspiracy. And I am supposed to stand by the frog...get real..it's delusional at best.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #788 12/31/08 -
Post by: MumInOhio on December 31, 2008, 02:48:06 PM
Mum,

I'm not the one being patronizing here.  I do believe that would be you.

I just tried to clear it up a bit, if I could.  That's why I mentioned specifically the DATES of those posts of Caps referring to this pond, that pond, and the other.  Then look at the DATE he sent the email to Dave.

Seems a handful of other monkeys noticed the same things Kermit had posted about - and had done so before Kermit posted about it.

I'm sorry if it's still unclear for you.



It is very clear to me and has been for many months. Probably before it became clear to you. Janet states she was alone when she doubted Caps...Go back before that in Shango and read, please. Try around April, probably the middle.  I have a heap of emails that go back much earlier than that.

Just because you think you are right does not make it so. My theory may not be correct either, but please don't act like this is all some new breakthrough!

I am familiar with the dates as well, Thank You. I read what is posted.

Now I will go back to my research which I have been working on as soon as I finish catching up.

As far as I can see this cage business is the diversion. JMO   
.

All of it or parts of it?

The whole darn cage! The time wasted discussing that cage!

Jossy gave out the witness name..Oops...my bad...Now there is not a witness.

I have to leave, I have been here since I got home and DH needs some to eat.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #788 12/31/08 -
Post by: Ree on December 31, 2008, 02:49:33 PM
How can "everyone" have the information now if we don't even know what ALE took from the cage?  There is more than just the photos. 

Exactly

The information that Kyle shared with the Freebirds that Kermit felt compelled to share...is that a better way of stating it?

So in regrds to the information Kyle shared that Kermit felt compelled to post here...and that was according to jen given to Beth, JQK and the FBI...that information, what is the opinion of Beth, JQK and the FBI in regards to the info and the conspiracy theory?

I couldn't tell you because I've never felt a need to directly contact the family members.  You see, I've always felt they have enough on their plates without having forum members contact them all the time. I also wouldn't call it a conspiracy theory.  I would call it more greed and the family being used once again.

ok...then what is the point of bringing it up at all if you don't want the answers...just want to slander the members of the Persistence...my point exactly.  Wasn't the whole point that Kermit saved the day and contacted Beth, the FBI and JQK???!! Hello?

BS - and the answer is NO.  The point is KYLE posted information at Freebirds.  FREEBIRDS sent the information to Beth and the FBI whether it was via Kermit or not I couldn't tell you.  The information was sent by them after they found out that KYLE had lied to them.  Why did KYLE lie? 

I thought the point was to expose the conspiracy. Why won't anyone address what Kermit said yesterday...that John Silvetti moved the contents of the trap to the pond and was working with the ALE to hide evidence that was in that trap. That my friend, in my humble opinion..is pure slander.
Then she went so far as to include Hotshot, Lalas, myself and Caps in her grand conspiracy. And I am supposed to stand by the frog...get real..it's delusional at best.

Isn't it rather interesting that both you and Hotshot usually show up at the same time to defend and disrupt.  If you discuss it elsewhere and then show up together, it is a conspiracy.  IMHO.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #788 12/31/08 -
Post by: Blonde on December 31, 2008, 02:49:56 PM
I need to find that post


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #788 12/31/08 -
Post by: SunnyinTX on December 31, 2008, 02:51:13 PM
My head is  :shaking: and :shaking2: and it hurts, a lot.  :smt017 All I want is Justice for Natalee  :gaah: There are many things posted in the past couple of days that I need to read over again. Perhaps then my head won't hurt.

Oh believe me it will...I simply came on this morning to try and get caught up!  I just went and took 2 Aleve and got a glass of Jamaican Rum Coconut Creme on the rocks!...hell it's five o'clock somewhere!

Not fair!!!  I want one.  My boss said No.

ssshhhhh I am slipping you one.... ::MonkeyWink::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #788 12/31/08 -
Post by: wingnut on December 31, 2008, 02:51:23 PM
I don't care whether anyone here respects me or not, and am not required to earn anything.

I cannot speak for anyone else - however, I was the one who personally contacted JQK and sent the photos to him.  My focus was to make sure that he and the family were AWARE of the photos' existence.  He did not offer an opinion - nor did I ask for one.  I sent the photos on September 16, and he confirmed on September 17 that he had received them.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #788 12/31/08 -
Post by: Magnolia on December 31, 2008, 02:52:45 PM
Muffy..
I am 10 pages back in the other thread, and forgive me if I am wrong, But Muffy and 2NJS are you saying I am a mole?
What the heck has got in to some of you?

 As for a flyby...I only just caught up and Kermit posted. My post from last night has been posted about before since November. Did either of you see the posts?

I asked Kermit questions which she did not answer after she was here 2 visits ago. She did not acknowledge my questions on her next questions.

She cut and pasted bits of posts from Shango for her posts. I checked and posted on this. More than once. She cheated to make her her point.

I joined a Private forum, because of the constant talk about this trap. Other things were happening we have been told  over and over to focus on the trap. No matter what else I posted about I very seldom got a response. As well as if you don't buy what some here are saying they treat you ugly.

Yesterday you welcomed 2 Newbies with open arms from a Private forum...But this is different...How!

I don't know what their motives for joining SM after all this time was, but as far as I am concerned I don't know either of them from a bar of soap...so they will both have to any respect from me!






Mum ~  I don't think you are a mole. Nothing has gotten in to me.  You posted, saying Kermit copied and pasted a post with Shango in it, and that you recognized the posts because you had worked with the Shango stuff so much.   I thought it interesting.  And I wondered if you had any other thoughts.  But you had left after the one post.  And I expressed that I hoped you would come back today and talk with us about it.  Do you  believe Kermit is trying to give false information and/or to mislead us.  And if so, why?  But only if you want to say.  I don't know why Kermit copied and pasted from Shango, if that is what she really did.  Was she trying to make a point, or to show us something?  Or was she trying to mislead?  Just wondering your take on it, since you recognized some of the posts from Shango and commented on that fact.  I don't know what your issue is with welcoming those that may be members in a private forum.  There are many here that are members of various forums and I don't do the behind the scenes things emailing and such so I don't know whom belongs to what.   If a poster is granted membership here, I will welcome them.  I have welcomed some who are still here posting, some I have welcomed got banned before the day was through.  Do you have a problem with posters that came last night and tried to explain what they understood was the truth?  Should they not be welcome?  Should  they not be allowed to post?  That isn't up to me, but to the admin.  My opinion is, if it will get us nearer to the truth and getting Natalee Holloway home, it's fine with me. 

Muffy...Kermit did this on her first post on this, I believe on November 13th. I have it all in my notes, but I will not be picking up my computer today it seems. I have posted about this. It bothers me. And I do not know why Kermit thought she needed to do it.

Yes, as far as I am concerned it is at the very least, misleading. I gave Kermit the benefit of the doubt and let it go, until she posted the same type thing last night. I also know that Kermit read my posts concerning this. What I would like to know is why Kermit felt it necessary to cut and paste bits and pieces, and out of context from posts in Shango to back up her posts. The only thing I can think of is that other posters keep saying that Kermit is backing up her posts. Technically she is.

Muffy, I am reading digs every day about Private Forums. Yet I guess it depends on which Private Forum you are a member of. I reserve judgement on all new posters, as I said they will earn my respect ...or not.

Time will tell how this all pans out, but it the meantime it is taking away my focus on what I should be researching. I do this for only one reason...I don't have any motive other than searching for the truth about Natalee.

Mum, I know you don't care for my opinions, but I think the
reason Kermit posted the snips about the ponds, was because
Caps came on this forum and said that he had never posted
about any pond except the Monserat Pond.  It was just Kermit
refuting the statement.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #788 12/31/08 -
Post by: Blonde on December 31, 2008, 02:52:52 PM
Tim Miller: In my years of searching we have seen several bodies, skeletal remains--I have seen my own daughter's skeletal remains. I can’t help but believe at this moment that that is human remains in that crab trap.
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/23301056/page/4/

Kyle said: “The brother of the detective came to us and was very persistent over the information.”
Kyle said: "- ”IF a key detective's brother knew the latitude ote author=Kermit link=topic=4269.msg604296#msg604296 date=1230692848]
Tim Miller: In my years of searching we have seen several bodies, skeletal remains--I have seen my own daughter's skeletal remains. I can’t help but believe at this moment that that is human remains in that crab trap.
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/23301056/page/4/

Kyle said: “The brother of the detective came to us and was very persistent over the information.”
Kyle said: "- ”IF a key detective's brother knew the latitude the trap was disposed at or very near, then it's probable the detective knew the same.”

February 2008 – Kyle tried to “strike a deal” with networks for the ROV footage.
March 1, 2008 – The Persistence announced it's return to Louisiana due to lack of money.
March 3, 2008 -  John Silvetti and Caps had a meeting in Aruba.
EMAIL From: Caps Lock
To: XXXXX; Sent: Monday, March 3, 2008 8:05:29 PM
Subject: FW: The meeting will be schedule at 2:00 pm - my house

March 08, 2008, 11:10:26 PM
Caps posted at SM: “I think we all have worked very hard this week and I have not had a chance to enjoy a good laugh since I started with the Monkeys on my research.

I hope tomorrow we will have the final links into a final resolution about the pond. This comming week is THE DAY.

Me and J & W and the C's are all in a agreement now that it must be there”



September 2008 – Freebirds contacted the FBI with the evidence.

10 MONTHS AFTER RETURNING TO THE UNITED STATES
Sunday, November 23, 2008 1:38 PM
Kyle emailed me: “I have recently been in contact with the FBI (within the last two weeks).”

Unless Kyle is a sociopath, which I do not believe, then he did not contact the FBI with the evidence of photos he has in his possession and was aware of during the RV Persistence dives. He did not intend to hand over that evidence until he was forced to do so AFTER The Freebirds contacted the FBI. He specifically stated he did not give any statements to the FBI after his leaving the RV Persistence. He did, however state he had tried to “strike a deal” with the networks executives to sell the ROV footage.

#364 on: Today at 10:54:08 AM   ldstlou
 just called again. Absolutely not true. Beth doesn't know about the theory of the photos or evidence that was collected and not turned over and Jug does not understand why Kermit is even stating this theory or information. Beth did not give Kermit to post photos on her behalf either.
http://scaredmonkeys.net/index.php?topic=4179.360

THE TRUTH IS
Not only do I have the emails from Beth, but also from another family member that confirms Beth's permission for me to expose the Aruba Cover-up.And who called her to try and stop it

 
Because everything Caps was doing was distracting, and leading away from the cage and always involved the pond which is a  distraction from the cage, I find it interesting to go back over the accumulation of events as they transpired for a refresher.

Keeping in mind that there are several  people at SM who want to believe the pond witness and what CAPS and Kyle have been telling them through John Silvetti.

Keep in mind, Kyle revealed to us that it was John Silvetti  who turned his attention away from the cage and refused to listen to anything Kyle had to say about the cage/trap. Although, it was John Silvetti who allowed the Aruban only divers to collect the evidence which was against what the plan had been.

 The initial plan discussed by the project leads and Aruban police was for us (the team on board the Persistence) to be directly involved in the recovery of the trap
 
#740 on: March 18, 2008, 12:22:38 PM
After the visual inspection on 30-Dec, the initial plan discussed by the project leads and Aruban police was for us (the team on board the Persistence) to be directly involved in the recovery of the trap.  There were talks about getting the proper equipment on board the Persistence such as a suction-recovery system to sift small items from the sand.  The talks continued after Jan-7th when the samples were collected
http://scaredmonkeys.net/index.php?topic=2705.msg366321#msg366321
 
Tim stepped off on or about the 1st of Jan
 
#705 on: November 20, 2008, 07:22:14 PM
Tim Miller was never on the Persistence while I was not on board.  He stepped off on or about the 1st of Jan to follow up on the false lead in Costa Rica IIRC.
http://scaredmonkeys.net/index.php?topic=4153.msg551291#msg551291
 

The talks about recovering the trap ceased around the 10-14th of Jan
 
#662 on: November 20, 2008, 05:21:05 PM
I got off the boat for 4 nights from the 10-14th of Jan for some much needed R&R.  I was in close communication with the boat and continued to post updates.  I didn't need to broadcast my presence on the island at the time.  I observed the vessel at or very near the location on the 11th and 12th for 42 and 45 minutes respectively.  I questioned the possibility of unknown diving ops taking place.  The talks about recovering the trap ceased around that time as well


http://scaredmonkeys.net/index.php?topic=4153.msg551145#msg551145
 
 Now let's follow along with the CAPS information that a group at SM has contact with him and believes in his version of the events and his witness[color]

CAPS  CLAIMS THIS POND CONTAINS A TENNIS SHOE AND HUMAN REMAINS SPECIAL NOTE - ACCORDING TO DAVE HOLLOWAY, CAPS WITNESS HAS MET WITH JOHN SILVETTI OF THE PERSISTENCE BY NOW .
 February 27, 2008
This time they have some special areas that they are checking. It started this morning and continue in the morning.

February 28, 2008:
Yes,
At 9:00 will go over there to amke sure they do not mis a spot....[color-red]The sneaker is there....where is the sneaker is the remains.



Remember Hotshot (Kathy Drenga) just recently told the monkeys that it was HER who directed Caps (and the witness) to Silvetti.
 
Could this REALLY be the first sign to prove the suspicions that Silvetti gave something from that trap to be put in the pond?  Shoe?  Skull? - speculation.



 Hotshot
Re: Natalee Case Discussion #781 12/3/08 -
« Reply #285 on: Today at 12:48:24 AM »

You all seem to jump to conclusions that everything was handed over to the incompetent ALE....... Did you ever stop to think that maybe there was a reason they took off so fast? Do you really think they are that stupid to not cover their butts? Hellooooo, Tim has been through it already, many times. Loose lips do sink ships. Maybe we are not supposed to be discussing those things here for everyone like Aruba to read.[/color]

CAPS STARTS OUT SAYING IT WAS MONTANA POND

January 22, 2008:

Well it says clearley the montana pond.

After this Joran at this time desided to despose of the body in Montana body of water.



January 27, 2008:

but the real body was dumped in a body of water in noord that has not been search

The MUI was a diversion for something else.



The day the search was in noord and the body of water that was search by the police was not to retrieve a body, bud to retrieve something else

The drop has happend but is not the body natalee drop.



February 1, 2008:

In my report I choose the White one but my road is not paved

The Montana Park Apartment is where all started..The Sex etc....

so look for the owners



CAPS BEGINS PLANTING THE SEED OF NEEDING A WITNESS

JaLALA:

The Must Be 2 witness for a conviction... but then they will play the "Not reliable Witness" for one of the witness.

The father can not testified against the son. The mother will Lie. July the reporter got his papers, etc

If no Second Withness, and Not A body, He will Walk

BETWEEN FEB 1 AND FEB 5, CAPS TALKS ABOUT NEEDING A WITNESS. ALSO ABOUT HOW THEY NEVER PUT HER IN THE OCEAN. ALSO ASKING KLAAS RELENTLESSLY IF SHE'S HEARD BACK FROM DAVE YET - ABOUT HIS EMAIL TO DAVE IN DECEMBER



NOW INTRODUCES THE WHITEHOUSE - WHICH IS NEAR MOKO POND

February 5, 2008



They mus have gone to this planned rave party at the Whitehouse. where she was raped and died.

THEN A WITNESS APPEARS TO CAPS. THE ANSWER TO HIS CONSTANT REMINDER TO MONKEYS THAT WE NEED ONE. NOTE THE WITNESS FIRST CLAIMS A TIME OF 3:44 AM

February 8, 2008
I know,

a Midnight aowl (SHOCO) saw him from his veranda at 3:44 passing in fornt of his house....All in muddy from the wate down....

Have new google earth.



CAPS FINALLY HEARS BACK FROM DAVE - AND AT THIS POINT, HE IS STILL DISCUSSING BOTH MOKO AND MONTANA - NO MENTION AT THIS POINT OF MONSERAT POND



February 16, 2008



Klaasend:

Did got Email from the man, He know nows and Understand.



ON THIS SAME DATE - CAPS NOW CLAIMS THIS WITNESS WAS MOVING AROUND, ENOUGH TO KNOW SECURITY WAS PATROLLING AND CAMERAS ROLLING



The witness state that the Bird was constantly moving in circle around the area that night..

and the bird normaly will wake you up and one will tent to go look up in the sky of what is going on. and wonder.

some take pictures. If picture was taken, the Man in the bird with his power beam will see you taken pictures. and can zoom in to see who you are.

CAPS TELLS US HIS UNCLE IS AN ATTORNEY

Yes the government has his own set of lawyers and only work for the Government.

The Lawyers also represents a group that work hand in hand with the OM.


I was wondering which lawyer was on the Roll that night to handel the cases.

On the Roll means (schedule) How I know this is that my uncle is a Lawyer and He always talk abaout to have Roll duty.

It means that he is on the evening list to handel cases comming in that night. it can also be a sub prosecuter.



NOW THE TIME THE WITNESS CLAIMS HAS CHANGED. WHY WAS THIS DONE? DID THEY REALIZE THE FIRST TIME STATED DIDN'T WORK WITH THE KNOWN TIMELINE?

February 23, 2008



CAPS say: 4:05 AM Joran passing in front of a witness house dirty and missing the Right shoe



NOW ENTER THE PERSISTENCE SEARCH OF THE POND. BUT WAIT, IT'S NEITHER OF THE PONDS CAPS HAS PREVIOUSLY CLAIMED - THEY SEARCH THE MONSERRAT POND

CAPS ALSO CLAIMS THIS POND CONTAINS A TENNIS SHOE AND HUMAN REMAINS

SPECIAL NOTE - ACCORDING TO DAVE HOLLOWAY, CAPS WITNESS HAS MET WITH JOHN SILVETTI OF THE PERSISTENCE BY NOW



February 27, 2008



This time they have some special areas that they are checking. It started this morning and continue in the morning.

February 28, 2008:



Yes,

At 9:00 will go over there to amke sure they do not mis a spot....The sneaker is there....where is the sneaker is the remains.



http://www.bondia.com/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=858&Itemid=1

Grupo di barco Mericano “Persistance” ta busca den dam na Montserat
Thursday, 28 February 2008

ORANJESTAD - Grupo di e barco Mericano “Persistance” ayera a dicidi di drenta dam na Montserat pa asina wak si nan por haya algo. Nan a pone un sonar ultra sofistica cu a base di un software ta lagabo wak tur cos cu tin tanto den e awa cu den e lodo den un forma tridimencional. Aunke cu e dam ta sumamente seco toch a logra haci un trabou amplio pa asina wak si por encontra algo di Nathalie Holloway. Despues di analisa tur e graphiconan cu nan a logra compila den e dam lo bai wak si ta yega na algo of no.





Quote from: oceanexploration on February 28, 2008, 03:34:45 PM


This is two of our crew out surveying the pond yesterday (27-Feb). They are using a SonaVision scanning sonar. The sonar scans 360 degrees out to a user select range. In this case we used between 50-100ft range. By placing multiple "drops" approximately 75-100 ft apart you can quickly and efficiently scan an entire pond.
I must have a good laught at this one. The boat they are in is TINY and Tony is a big guy.



DESTINY ASKING THE MONKEYS IF SHE SHOULD SEND FISH TRAP PHOTOS POSTED BY ROBIN H TO ARUBAN COPS - CAPS TELLING HER NO WAY, SEVERAL TIMES - EVEN WARNS DESTINY TO BE FEARFUL FOR HERSELF IF SHE DOES



February 28, 2008:

You are right LALA, they have a room full of intell person sitting and listeting and watching..I know this for a fact.

I say do not make a move.

Want to play it safe...tell them that your computer got a Virus...had to be reformatted. everything is lost.

We live in a digital world where loosing a bit is not much but for safegaurd one self..

The new MOSvirus.irc just eat your hard disk and you are foregiven.

Lay low for a couple of days and back on track

CAPS



Do not sent anything...

I know that for a fact that if they know who you are they will fabricate any thing to put you away....I know that for a fact...so be carfull....

BTW, they have all information them self....They are the one that is playing in the band.

now they have lost a band string and they want to compare....

Shango would say DO NOT TSURT....bad move....you will not win if you show your playing cards.



CAPS REVEALS HE HAS A BROTHER WORKING WITH EITHER LAW ENFORCEMENT OR THE PROSECUTOR'S OFFICE



Klaasend:

watch the news of tomorrow on what the comments are today from Hans MOS...He is pisst on the search in Monserat. My bother was telling me that MOS want to know all the detail and how they came about to that area.

...Hmmmmm..

I was not there to listen to the news today...but MOS is upset....



CAPS VISITS THE POND HIMSELF

February 28, 2008:





Well I did not know till I check where the pipes are leading to.

I will have picture of the pipes tomorrow.

to get in the pipes, one must put on a coverall becuase you will get dirty and it is very dark and a long walk. to the other end.

I need big light to check these pipes.

when the pond fills up, all the debry stay in the pond only the water will move to the other end in another waterbasin. I never know about this but my dad has clearyfy it. The rain water will move to another water basin. anything large and havy will stay in the pipe since the water flow is not strong. The flow only start when the pond fills-up.

Will check it but it has a horrable stenge.

I will take some picture to compare.

THE DAY CAPS VISITS THE POND, CAPS NOW STATES THERE COULD BE HUMAN REMAINS IN MONSERAT POND, AND ALSO HUMAN REMAINS IN MOKO POND - WHICH TIES IN WITH HIS EARLIER ASSERTIONS OF THE WHITEHOUSE APARTMENTS.

KEEP REMEMBERING THAT THIS WITNESS OF CAPS HAS BY NOW MET WITH JOHN SILVETTI


February 29, 2008

The problem with Moko pool is that if they dump the body in there, this acctiion leave Joran walking home. and not to the McDonnald.

Now lets assume that what is said that the head was not part of the body no more, and that both places has been used.

The Moko Pool which is right at the doorstep of the Whitehouse Apartment and there they could have dumb a peace of the body then drive Joran to the Monserat Pool and split leaving Joran alone.

Driving to the Monserat they will dump an other peace of the body.
Split and leave Joran behind.
The Monserat pool will leave him walking to McDonald.

This will give both Simian and Shango Validity for their writtings.

BRB..
CAPS
 
 CAPS ACCUSING KERMIT OF LYING
Posted this at SM:
 
Kermit: why are you stir the monkey cage by lying....I never siad the Moko nor Montanja but the Monserat pond.


CAPS ADMITS TO DIVING AT THE CAGE/TRAP

”I went to dive a week a go to the same location, and the Cage is still there. If the cage was evidance in a murder case, why is it still in the water.”

MARCH 1 CAPS SAYS CAGE IS A POST OFFICE
(remember March 1 is when it was announced that the RV Persistence was returning home AND March 3 is when John Silvetti met with CAPS).
  http://scaredmonkeys.net/index.php?topic=2662.msg358441#msg358441


MARCH 3, 2008 – John Silvetti meets with CapsLockWizard

From an email sent from CapsLockWizard:
“Yes, We did have the meeting today. It was a long meeting and we are all set to start the process of a permit to drain. Witness will gave statement to Lawyer (Helen), Lawyer will motion to drain the pond to OM. If Motion denied, will go to media and expose more dirt. John knows everything now and he will stay behind to help and protect. John state the cage was empty. it was full of these broken plastic bags that shows on the cam like skull, but he said to me it is the water doing tricks when picture was taken. He thinks also it is a postoffice. When I told him the story about the cage, he also understand now some things that he could not have question about. Like why is the Panter allways parked over the spot while there is notting anymore in he cage. The meeting end at 5:00 pm and was very good. About the Pipes. They will be checked. Also John thinks that the signs are there but need to drain the pond. Also Withness is 99% it was some one that came from the pond area that he saw, because it looks like a dutch man and was cover in mud from the chest down.”


 WHO CONTACTED CAPS?
Re: Natalee Case Discussion #715 1/25 -
« Reply #407 on: January 27, 2008, 12:17:04 PM
Caps are you from aruba?  A friend of mine that I talk to there, also talks like you do is only why I ask......  TIA
http://scaredmonkeys.net/index.php?topic=2539.msg333009#msg333009


AND SHE CONTACTED KYLE:
Hi there, and good to see you here at the SM site.  It was me who sent that cryptic message to your blog, [color]sorry about all that.  Its just one of the things that we dealt with here early on in the case.  It looked to be someone in the know.  You can take it down if you wish, I just thought it might be of some help.  But once again, I praise the work you guys are doing, and wish I could be there myself to help with the search.  My prayers are with all of you for a great outcome.  Hey, remember, there really are pirates out there!
http://scaredmonkeys.net/index.php?topic=2429.msg315194#msg315194

how would she possibly know this unless she has been in contact with Kyle
 
March 07, 2008, 12:54:54 PM
There are no doors on the back of the huts.  I can vouch for that.  All doors on the front.   http://i67.photobucket.com/albums/h294/gummy_2006/hutcollage.jpg   Kyle has taken some of the same pictures I took while over there.[color]  The new wood door, is the hut that was broken into.
--------------------------------------


John did go back to work with CAPS 2 times that I know of, to Aruba, about the Monstart pond.  He was with CAPS the whole time
http://scaredmonkeys.net/index.php?topic=4173.msg555976#msg555976

853 on: December 08, 2008, 03:05:43 PM   hotshot
I have spoken to Mr Silvetti twice.  And that was only to see if he wanted help with the pond and the search.  I would have gone to help.  do i know him personally, no.  The only information i know is from kyle or dave, and no i was not in the private forum.  You guys brought over a quote stating that kyle says john said.... tim was not needed anymore, he is a liability.  Correct?
Just answering
http://scaredmonkeys.net/index.php?topic=4216.msg571886#msg571886


AND SHE CONTACTED JOHN SILVITTI
HotShot: SM  Reply #687 on: December 04, 2008, 06:42:20 PM »
 “[color=red}I personally have met with Tim, and Schafer way back in Jan of 2006 back when they were trying to get things going with the Persistence, and getting the OK to go to Aruban waters.  It was several of us that met with them.













WHO IS DEFENDING KYLE AND CAPS?/b]

Now, if we remember Kathy Drenga (Hotshot)  - she is the one that went to Aruba with BestBuddy & uploaded the Aru-bay videos to her website and the photos of the Lions Den. THEN she is the one that felt Natalee was buried in the cometary. THEN she thought she was in the BAG that Blonde found and that photo was seen in National Enquirer. THEN Kathy Drenga (Hotshot) started talking with Kyle and also CAPS.

as I'm reading back through ALL her posts, I'm see a picture. She is FEEDING CAPS information.That is why we see CAPS post she is in the MOKO (Kathy posted about the MOKO too), then he changes it to Montajan then the cemetery etc etc.

She sets it up for CAPS to go meet John Silvetti after contacting Kyle and from there CAPS story changes like the wind just like hers.

#902 on: July 11, 2006, 05:39:05 PM Hotshot:
I just feel those ponds that "WONT" be searched is a place that needs to be.  They know they cant drain them, too much water, and they know they cant dive them, too murky.  They are not dumb, but like to play dumb.  Don't forget they got a hit with the dogs at one, but couldn't do anything about it
http://scaredmonkeys.net/index.php?topic=63.msg13147#msg13147

REMEMBER THIS:
CAPS  CLAIMS THIS POND CONTAINS A TENNIS SHOE AND HUMAN REMAINS SPECIAL NOTE - ACCORDING TO DAVE HOLLOWAY, CAPS WITNESS HAS MET WITH JOHN SILVETTI OF THE PERSISTENCE BY NOW

Hotshot:
Don't know, but that mud would eat his shoes for sure.
http://scaredmonkeys.net/index.php?topic=164.msg31737#msg31737


Hotshot: “You guys are going to look really silly in the end for downing the people like silvetti, and Kyle, and CAPS.”
http://scaredmonkeys.net/index.php?topic=4186.msg565899#msg565899


Idstlou

213 on: September 22, 2008, 10:04:02 AM   ldstlou
Lalas!!! Our friend just called you back and you didn't answer!!! lol
Can you call him back now. 
http://scaredmonkeys.net/index.php?topic=3390.200
 
lalasmom
 #231 on: September 22, 2008, 11:25:48 AM   lalasmom
Sorry!!  So sorry!! LOL  Will do...give me a minute...I was talking to my kid.  Sorry!
http://scaredmonkeys.net/index.php?topic=3390.220
 
 
#410 on: September 23, 2008, 08:56:12 AM   ldstlou
Lalas!! your phone is ringing!!   

trying to caaaaall you!!! lol 
http://scaredmonkeys.net/index.php?topic=3390.msg467158#msg467158
 
413 on: September 23, 2008, 09:03:27 AM  lalassmom
No it's not!  LOL  Try again.
http://scaredmonkeys.net/index.php?topic=3390.msg467158#msg467158
 
 
#344 on: September 22, 2008, 09:20:45 PM   lalasmom
So Tim Miller and John Silvetti are the ones that made arrangements for Caps witness to come to the USA and take the polygraph.  Mos was a bit upset.  Why am I not surprised?
http://scaredmonkeys.net/index.php?topic=3390.340

lalas here/attachment/don't delete
Thursday, January 31, 2008 8:16 AM
Capslockwizard info.
[Note: This was the email to Dave Holloway]


Yapperz
 #476 on: Today at 10:18:37 PM  yapperz
Tamikosmom posted:
<snip>
Yap ... do you have information to the contrary.

Janet

______


Janet, actually I do. I would rather not go in to it here. You are welcome to get my email address from Klaas.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #788 12/31/08 -
Post by: adoronron on December 31, 2008, 02:52:55 PM
Mum,

I'm not the one being patronizing here.  I do believe that would be you.

I just tried to clear it up a bit, if I could.  That's why I mentioned specifically the DATES of those posts of Caps referring to this pond, that pond, and the other.  Then look at the DATE he sent the email to Dave.

Seems a handful of other monkeys noticed the same things Kermit had posted about - and had done so before Kermit posted about it.

I'm sorry if it's still unclear for you.



It is very clear to me and has been for many months. Probably before it became clear to you. Janet states she was alone when she doubted Caps...Go back before that in Shango and read, please. Try around April, probably the middle.  I have a heap of emails that go back much earlier than that.

Just because you think you are right does not make it so. My theory may not be correct either, but please don't act like this is all some new breakthrough!

I am familiar with the dates as well, Thank You. I read what is posted.

Now I will go back to my research which I have been working on as soon as I finish catching up.

As far as I can see this cage business is the diversion. JMO  
.

Mum,

I pop on every few days to catch up. I used to get involved with the discussions but for some time now, it seems to me, not much headway is being made. And I think the reason is the diversions that occur. It's as if someone or several people are watching SM and every so often they determine SM is on to something and they implement a diversion. Whoever he, she, or they are, they must be very satisfied with their most recent endeavor what with all the terse posts of late among the SMer's.

I agree with your comment "As far as I can see this cage business is the diversion".

My own opinion is; No body no case + incinerator operator suicide = no body. JMO

Ado


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #788 12/31/08 -
Post by: truthseeker2 on December 31, 2008, 02:52:55 PM
My head is  :shaking: and :shaking2: and it hurts, a lot.  :smt017 All I want is Justice for Natalee  :gaah: There are many things posted in the past couple of days that I need to read over again. Perhaps then my head won't hurt.

Oh believe me it will...I simply came on this morning to try and get caught up!  I just went and took 2 Aleve and got a glass of Jamaican Rum Coconut Creme on the rocks!...hell it's five o'clock somewhere!

Not fair!!!  I want one.  My boss said No.

ssshhhhh I am slipping you one.... ::MonkeyWink::

thank you!  such a good monkey friend!


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #788 12/31/08 -
Post by: bastibro on December 31, 2008, 02:53:05 PM
Quote
. . John Silvetti moved the contents of the trap to the pond and was working with the ALE to hide evidence that was in that trap.

Now what in the world could be the reason for Silvetti to do that?!
Who is buying that crap ::MonkeyNoNo::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #788 12/31/08 -
Post by: MumInOhio on December 31, 2008, 02:55:20 PM
MUM - I don't like private invite only forums mostly because they end up causing problems.  I really don't like ChatnGrumble because I happen to know that Destiny and ******* are spreading lies about me and they are also both moderators at ChatnGrumble.  They are both either nuts or incredibly stupid but they are 100% wrong.  So if that is the private forum you belong to they will not get a "kudos" from me. 

You really do have to wonder about a private invite only forum that feels a need to have a secret hidey hole within the private invite only forum for the very special of the very special people.  ::MonkeyRoll::

Klaas..No-one is asking for kudos for anything. I am posting in one area of a place I post to try and work through some things. Putting it all in one area and trying to find out what it all means. There are no other topics to sidetrack me.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #788 12/31/08 -
Post by: klaasend on December 31, 2008, 02:56:09 PM
I don't care whether anyone here respects me or not, and am not required to earn anything.

I cannot speak for anyone else - however, I was the one who personally contacted JQK and sent the photos to him.  My focus was to make sure that he and the family were AWARE of the photos' existence.  He did not offer an opinion - nor did I ask for one.  I sent the photos on September 16, and he confirmed on September 17 that he had received them.
Thanks Wingnut - and that is my point.  Kermit has never said that she single handedly did anything (except maybe in jest).  Thank you for sending the information to JQK.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #788 12/31/08 -
Post by: Keepthefaith on December 31, 2008, 02:57:10 PM
If people think it's a diversion why not speak up and explain why?No one has!I'll wait to hear why this is a diversion..Anyone???Please explain the diversion to the slow people who are not in the know so to speak.TIA


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #788 12/31/08 -
Post by: San on December 31, 2008, 02:59:52 PM
Blonde,

You made a post in the last thread about Caps posting, and a lack of Aruban people on the meter.

Just wanted you to know there were others who noticed that as well.  On numerous occasions.  ::MonkeyCool::

I have about 20 in my documents. I have even sent klaas one. From Aruba.


You can get a progran hide the IP and it will show everyone your posting from where ever you want. I know this for a fact, because I had it on my old computer.


Very interesting.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #788 12/31/08 -
Post by: Keepthefaith on December 31, 2008, 03:01:50 PM
If people think it's a diversion why not speak up and explain why?No one has!I'll wait to hear why this is a diversion..Anyone???Please explain the diversion to the slow people who are not in the know so to speak.TIA

What is the diversion and what are we supposed to be diverted from?Anyone?TIA


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #788 12/31/08 -
Post by: MumInOhio on December 31, 2008, 03:03:33 PM
Muffy..
I am 10 pages back in the other thread, and forgive me if I am wrong, But Muffy and 2NJS are you saying I am a mole?
What the heck has got in to some of you?

 As for a flyby...I only just caught up and Kermit posted. My post from last night has been posted about before since November. Did either of you see the posts?

I asked Kermit questions which she did not answer after she was here 2 visits ago. She did not acknowledge my questions on her next questions.

She cut and pasted bits of posts from Shango for her posts. I checked and posted on this. More than once. She cheated to make her her point.

I joined a Private forum, because of the constant talk about this trap. Other things were happening we have been told  over and over to focus on the trap. No matter what else I posted about I very seldom got a response. As well as if you don't buy what some here are saying they treat you ugly.

Yesterday you welcomed 2 Newbies with open arms from a Private forum...But this is different...How!

I don't know what their motives for joining SM after all this time was, but as far as I am concerned I don't know either of them from a bar of soap...so they will both have to any respect from me!






Mum ~  I don't think you are a mole. Nothing has gotten in to me.  You posted, saying Kermit copied and pasted a post with Shango in it, and that you recognized the posts because you had worked with the Shango stuff so much.   I thought it interesting.  And I wondered if you had any other thoughts.  But you had left after the one post.  And I expressed that I hoped you would come back today and talk with us about it.  Do you  believe Kermit is trying to give false information and/or to mislead us.  And if so, why?  But only if you want to say.  I don't know why Kermit copied and pasted from Shango, if that is what she really did.  Was she trying to make a point, or to show us something?  Or was she trying to mislead?  Just wondering your take on it, since you recognized some of the posts from Shango and commented on that fact.  I don't know what your issue is with welcoming those that may be members in a private forum.  There are many here that are members of various forums and I don't do the behind the scenes things emailing and such so I don't know whom belongs to what.   If a poster is granted membership here, I will welcome them.  I have welcomed some who are still here posting, some I have welcomed got banned before the day was through.  Do you have a problem with posters that came last night and tried to explain what they understood was the truth?  Should they not be welcome?  Should  they not be allowed to post?  That isn't up to me, but to the admin.  My opinion is, if it will get us nearer to the truth and getting Natalee Holloway home, it's fine with me. 

Muffy...Kermit did this on her first post on this, I believe on November 13th. I have it all in my notes, but I will not be picking up my computer today it seems. I have posted about this. It bothers me. And I do not know why Kermit thought she needed to do it.

Yes, as far as I am concerned it is at the very least, misleading. I gave Kermit the benefit of the doubt and let it go, until she posted the same type thing last night. I also know that Kermit read my posts concerning this. What I would like to know is why Kermit felt it necessary to cut and paste bits and pieces, and out of context from posts in Shango to back up her posts. The only thing I can think of is that other posters keep saying that Kermit is backing up her posts. Technically she is.

Muffy, I am reading digs every day about Private Forums. Yet I guess it depends on which Private Forum you are a member of. I reserve judgement on all new posters, as I said they will earn my respect ...or not.

Time will tell how this all pans out, but it the meantime it is taking away my focus on what I should be researching. I do this for only one reason...I don't have any motive other than searching for the truth about Natalee.

Mum, I know you don't care for my opinions, but I think the
reason Kermit posted the snips about the ponds, was because
Caps came on this forum and said that he had never posted
about any pond except the Monserat Pond.  It was just Kermit
refuting the statement.

Magnolia...If that is the case, then it is wrong. It will be picked up down the road and quoted. Eventually it will believed the way Kermit posted it.

And I will probably be the sucker going way back looking to see where it all came from.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #788 12/31/08 -
Post by: truthseeker2 on December 31, 2008, 03:03:41 PM

Mum,

I pop on every few days to catch up. I used to get involved with the discussions but for some time now, it seems to me, not much headway is being made. And I think the reason is the diversions that occur. It's as if someone or several people are watching SM and every so often they determine SM is on to something and they implement a diversion. Whoever he, she, or they are, they must be very satisfied with their most recent endeavor what with all the terse posts of late among the SMer's.

I agree with your comment "As far as I can see this cage business is the diversion".

My own opinion is; No body no case + incinerator operator suicide = no body. JMO

Ado

Your post reminds me of this:

Start with a cage containing five monkeys. In the cage, hang a banana on a string and put a set of stairs under it. Before long, a monkey will go to the stairs and start to climb towards the banana. As soon as he touches the stairs, spray all of the monkeys with cold water. After awhile, another monkey makes an attempt with the same result. Pretty soon, when any monkey tries to climb the stairs, the other monkeys will try to prevent it.
Now, turn off the cold water. Remove one monkey from the cage and replace it with a new one. The new monkey sees the banana and wants to climb the stairs. To his horror, all of the other monkeys attack him. After another attempt and attack, he knows that if he tries to climb the stairs, he will be assaulted.

Next, remove another of the original five monkeys and replace it with a new one. The newcomer goes to the stairs and is attacked. The previous newcomer takes part in the punishment with enthusiasm. Again, replace a third original monkey with a new one. The new one makes it to the stairs and is attacked as well. Two of the four monkeys that beat him have no idea why they were not permitted to climb the stairs, or why they are participating in the beating of the newest monkey.

After replacing the fourth and fifth original monkeys, all the monkeys which have been sprayed with cold water have been replaced. Nevertheless, no monkey ever again approaches the stairs. Why not? Because that's the way things are, now…


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #788 12/31/08 -
Post by: Ree on December 31, 2008, 03:04:44 PM
If people think it's a diversion why not speak up and explain why?No one has!I'll wait to hear why this is a diversion..Anyone???Please explain the diversion to the slow people who are not in the know so to speak.TIA

What is the diversion and what are we supposed to be diverted from?Anyone?TIA

And since those whose think it's a diverson rarely post here anymore, why do they care?


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #788 12/31/08 -
Post by: truthseeker2 on December 31, 2008, 03:04:49 PM
Quote
. . John Silvetti moved the contents of the trap to the pond and was working with the ALE to hide evidence that was in that trap.

Now what in the world could be the reason for Silvetti to do that?!
Who is buying that crap ::MonkeyNoNo::

Not me.  This is where some credibility began to wear thin.  imho.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #788 12/31/08 -
Post by: wingnut on December 31, 2008, 03:07:10 PM
I don't care whether anyone here respects me or not, and am not required to earn anything.

I cannot speak for anyone else - however, I was the one who personally contacted JQK and sent the photos to him.  My focus was to make sure that he and the family were AWARE of the photos' existence.  He did not offer an opinion - nor did I ask for one.  I sent the photos on September 16, and he confirmed on September 17 that he had received them.
Thanks Wingnut - and that is my point.  Kermit has never said that she single handedly did anything (except maybe in jest).  Thank you for sending the information to JQK.


Thanks, Klaas. 

So, I guess I can say that I single-handedly contacted JQK!  :) 


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #788 12/31/08 -
Post by: klaasend on December 31, 2008, 03:07:17 PM
OK - please go on with any discussions that we were diverted from.  


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #788 12/31/08 -
Post by: Ree on December 31, 2008, 03:07:25 PM
Quote
. . John Silvetti moved the contents of the trap to the pond and was working with the ALE to hide evidence that was in that trap.

Now what in the world could be the reason for Silvetti to do that?!
Who is buying that crap ::MonkeyNoNo::

Not me.  This is where some credibility began to wear thin.  imho.

Maybe is crap, but didn't Kyle himself raise the issue of Silvetti's loyalties which I believe is why he's in hot water.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #788 12/31/08 -
Post by: Keepthefaith on December 31, 2008, 03:07:45 PM
Quote
. . John Silvetti moved the contents of the trap to the pond and was working with the ALE to hide evidence that was in that trap.

Now what in the world could be the reason for Silvetti to do that?!
Who is buying that crap ::MonkeyNoNo::

Not me.  This is where some credibility began to wear thin.  imho.

Truthseeker2.As you are an analyst and i am not.Please explain as to why i shouldn't believe Kermit??No one as of yet has refutted with any clarity as to why anyhting Kermit is saying is untrue..


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #788 12/31/08 -
Post by: Anna on December 31, 2008, 03:07:55 PM
I don't care whether anyone here respects me or not, and am not required to earn anything.

I cannot speak for anyone else - however, I was the one who personally contacted JQK and sent the photos to him.  My focus was to make sure that he and the family were AWARE of the photos' existence.  He did not offer an opinion - nor did I ask for one.  I sent the photos on September 16, and he confirmed on September 17 that he had received them.
Thanks Wingnut - and that is my point.  Kermit has never said that she single handedly did anything (except maybe in jest).  Thank you for sending the information to JQK.


And I don't recall Kermit ever saying the family had the remains and were hiding this fact.  Here is the post I asked ldstlou about:


 Online

Posts: 45514



    Re: Natalee Case Discussion #782 12/5/08 -
« Reply #49 on: December 05, 2008, 10:37:32 AM » 

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Quote from: ldstlou on December 05, 2008, 10:31:10 AM
Quote from: klaasend on December 05, 2008, 10:16:48 AM
LDSTLOU - in a due respect, we can focus on more than one issue at a time.  The fact the Rudy is calling out Van der Straaten is not lost on any of us.  We have not lost sight nor dismissed the possibility of FINALLY something happening, some kind of justice in Aruba.

That said, it has no bearing on side discussions of how we got to to this point and where Natalee was disposed of/hidden.

{This is reply of ldstlou.  I am mortified that Jug was told that SM posted the family had the remains and were concealing this fact when nothing of the sort was EVER posted here except by ld herself!!!}

I am done. When in the heck did I say NOT to focus on something???!!! Let me reiterate!!!! kermit is saying in one breath the family has Natalee's body and is hiding that fact from the world. In another breath that the ALE has her body and Kyle was complicit in that cover up. I am saying BULLSHIT to both!!!! Why am I saying bullshit? Because I asked Jug and gave you his answer...and you know I asked him Klaas. Now the references that I am a liar...and the family is lying...and I simply STATING!!!! what Jug asked me to convey to you all this morning...to pray and focus on van der straaten!!! I never once said what to discuss or not to discuss...with all due respect!

{Klaas replied}}


I'm not as sure as you are that Kermit is saying that Beth/Jug and Dave have Natalee's body.  That said, any suggestions (besides emailing the embassy) on how we keep the focus on Van der Straaten?  Looks like Rudy has taken the first step. Is there something we should be doing that will help?  Any ideas? 


-----------

My point is what on earth is the family to think if people run to them and give them totally false information, misrepresent what was posted, etc.?  No wonder they would be confused.

It was NEVER posted here that the family had Natalee's remains yet evidently that is what Jug was told.

No, I am not at all comfortable with this kind of thing being done.  I can only hope the family has seen and heard enough to know BS when they hear it.  Or check for themselves.



Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #788 12/31/08 -
Post by: Anna on December 31, 2008, 03:12:09 PM
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/3032507/

At least 53 dead in Bangkok nightclub fire, police say


Are we sure Joran is in fact in Laos now?


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #788 12/31/08 -
Post by: MumInOhio on December 31, 2008, 03:13:02 PM
If people think it's a diversion why not speak up and explain why?No one has!I'll wait to hear why this is a diversion..Anyone???Please explain the diversion to the slow people who are not in the know so to speak.TIA

Keepthefaith...Not sure why you don't get it...Ado did, probably because you are so busy trying to stir up the damn pot with your posts. And boy have you made a lot of them since November 18th...there is that darn date again...Oh My!

Happy New Year's!


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #788 12/31/08 -
Post by: Ree on December 31, 2008, 03:13:56 PM
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/3032507/

At least 53 dead in Bangkok nightclub fire, police say


Are we sure Joran is in fact in Laos now?

Sorry for the OT, but I just noticed your disclaimer in the bottom of your post.  I love it! ::MonkeyHaHa::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #788 12/31/08 -
Post by: klaasend on December 31, 2008, 03:15:27 PM

Mum,

I pop on every few days to catch up. I used to get involved with the discussions but for some time now, it seems to me, not much headway is being made. And I think the reason is the diversions that occur. It's as if someone or several people are watching SM and every so often they determine SM is on to something and they implement a diversion. Whoever he, she, or they are, they must be very satisfied with their most recent endeavor what with all the terse posts of late among the SMer's.

I agree with your comment "As far as I can see this cage business is the diversion".

My own opinion is; No body no case + incinerator operator suicide = no body. JMO

Ado

Your post reminds me of this:

Start with a cage containing five monkeys. In the cage, hang a banana on a string and put a set of stairs under it. Before long, a monkey will go to the stairs and start to climb towards the banana. As soon as he touches the stairs, spray all of the monkeys with cold water. After awhile, another monkey makes an attempt with the same result. Pretty soon, when any monkey tries to climb the stairs, the other monkeys will try to prevent it.
Now, turn off the cold water. Remove one monkey from the cage and replace it with a new one. The new monkey sees the banana and wants to climb the stairs. To his horror, all of the other monkeys attack him. After another attempt and attack, he knows that if he tries to climb the stairs, he will be assaulted.

Next, remove another of the original five monkeys and replace it with a new one. The newcomer goes to the stairs and is attacked. The previous newcomer takes part in the punishment with enthusiasm. Again, replace a third original monkey with a new one. The new one makes it to the stairs and is attacked as well. Two of the four monkeys that beat him have no idea why they were not permitted to climb the stairs, or why they are participating in the beating of the newest monkey.

After replacing the fourth and fifth original monkeys, all the monkeys which have been sprayed with cold water have been replaced. Nevertheless, no monkey ever again approaches the stairs. Why not? Because that's the way things are, now…


How insulting of you


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #788 12/31/08 -
Post by: Linda in MD on December 31, 2008, 03:15:32 PM
Klaasend,
Do you know if Tim Miller or John Silvetti has been interviewed about the retrieval of the contents of the cage?
Linda


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #788 12/31/08 -
Post by: klaasend on December 31, 2008, 03:17:34 PM
Klaasend,
Do you know if Tim Miller or John Silvetti has been interviewed about the retrieval of the contents of the cage?
Linda

Not that I'm aware of.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #788 12/31/08 -
Post by: Anna on December 31, 2008, 03:19:01 PM
OK - please go on with any discussions that we were diverted from.  


LOL!  Yes, by all means!

Now this should be interesting.  Some days it seems everything is a diversion.  I suspect that some days they are in fact just that.




Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #788 12/31/08 -
Post by: truthseeker2 on December 31, 2008, 03:19:14 PM
Quote
. . John Silvetti moved the contents of the trap to the pond and was working with the ALE to hide evidence that was in that trap.

Now what in the world could be the reason for Silvetti to do that?!
Who is buying that crap ::MonkeyNoNo::

Not me.  This is where some credibility began to wear thin.  imho.

Maybe is crap, but didn't Kyle himself raise the issue of Silvetti's loyalties which I believe is why he's in hot water.

Ree, that statement that implies Silvetti and the ALE conspired to move evidence to another location...and oh, let me think here...uh...they moved it, but no one found where they moved it, which was to a pond that CAPS finally decided on after several attempts to pick a a proper pond to move it to, so that his witness would be giving the correct information to place Joran at that decided upon pond...with the transplanted evidence, that even now has not been 'found'....maybe they are waiting for Mum and Lala's to come to Aruba and find that transplanted evidence that we all know is in the third pond.

Sheesh.  I'm sorry, but that implication just doesn't strike me as plausible.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #788 12/31/08 -
Post by: klaasend on December 31, 2008, 03:19:42 PM
OK - please go on with any discussions that we were diverted from.  


LOL!  Yes, by all means!

Now this should be interesting.  Some days it seems everything is a diversion.  I suspect that some days they are in fact just that.




Thanks Anna - glad you caught my sarcasm  ::MonkeyWink::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #788 12/31/08 -
Post by: jen3560 on December 31, 2008, 03:20:52 PM


Maybe is crap, but didn't Kyle himself raise the issue of Silvetti's loyalties which I believe is why he's in hot water.

Yes, he certainly did.  He told us in no uncertain terms that he felt Silvetti's intentions began as honorable - but that his focus shifted.

Also that Silvetti didn't want to question ALE about their insistence the cage was "not relevant" for fear of ruining newly made friendships and contacts.  Because Silvetti had plans to open an office on the island and do business in S America and Aruba.

FWIW - Kyle also never, ever believed in this whole pond witness thing, until the very end when we were wanting to publish our document containing the cage images and Kyle's words.

Then all of a sudden he says the pond witness is "credible", and Silvetti is, after all, "trustworthy".

I took that with a whole dumptruck of salt.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #788 12/31/08 -
Post by: snoopy on December 31, 2008, 03:24:11 PM
This is so fubar.  Sorry.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #788 12/31/08 -
Post by: Linda in MD on December 31, 2008, 03:24:47 PM
Klaasend,
Might Dana be interested in interviewing Tim Miller or John Silvetti about the retrieval of the contents of the cage?
Linda


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #788 12/31/08 -
Post by: wingnut on December 31, 2008, 03:25:28 PM


Maybe is crap, but didn't Kyle himself raise the issue of Silvetti's loyalties which I believe is why he's in hot water.

Yes, he certainly did.  He told us in no uncertain terms that he felt Silvetti's intentions began as honorable - but that his focus shifted.

Also that Silvetti didn't want to question ALE about their insistence the cage was "not relevant" for fear of ruining newly made friendships and contacts.  Because Silvetti had plans to open an office on the island and do business in S America and Aruba.

FWIW - Kyle also never, ever believed in this whole pond witness thing, until the very end when we were wanting to publish our document containing the cage images and Kyle's words.

Then all of a sudden he says the pond witness is "credible", and Silvetti is, after all, "trustworthy".


I took that with a whole dumptruck of salt.


AND, as I recall - his sudden "about face" came out of nowhere.  After he had been absent from the forum for, ummm, two months or so?  We were like WTF?


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #788 12/31/08 -
Post by: Keepthefaith on December 31, 2008, 03:27:13 PM
If people think it's a diversion why not speak up and explain why?No one has!I'll wait to hear why this is a diversion..Anyone???Please explain the diversion to the slow people who are not in the know so to speak.TIA

Keepthefaith...Not sure why you don't get it...Ado did, probably because you are so busy trying to stir up the damn pot with your posts. And boy have you made a lot of them since November 18th...there is that darn date again...Oh My!

Happy New Year's!

I'm Simply not as Knowledgable as some but to insinuate i'm stirring up the pot is pretty unfortunate.Personnally attacking me doesn't bother me!I don't know what the diversion is?I'm stirring the pot From Seattle,in my store,for what reason.Please do explain my motivation Mum??


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #788 12/31/08 -
Post by: jen3560 on December 31, 2008, 03:27:28 PM
Anna,

You have made some excellent points the last few pages.

The point here is - what happened to the items Aruba recovered from that trap?

What can we all do to get an investigation into this?

Tim Miller and Kyle Kingman both believe there were human remains in that trap.

The rest of us weren't there -we can only go by their words and beliefs, and the images Kyle shared.



Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #788 12/31/08 -
Post by: bastibro on December 31, 2008, 03:28:08 PM
Quote
. . John Silvetti moved the contents of the trap to the pond and was working with the ALE to hide evidence that was in that trap.

Now what in the world could be the reason for Silvetti to do that?!
Who is buying that crap ::MonkeyNoNo::

Not me.  This is where some credibility began to wear thin.  imho.

Maybe is crap, but didn't Kyle himself raise the issue of Silvetti's loyalties which I believe is why he's in hot water.

Ree, that statement that implies Silvetti and the ALE conspired to move evidence to another location...and oh, let me think here...uh...they moved it, but no one found where they moved it, which was to a pond that CAPS finally decided on after several attempts to pick a a proper pond to move it to, so that his witness would be giving the correct information to place Joran at that decided upon pond...with the transplanted evidence, that even now has not been 'found'....maybe they are waiting for Mum and Lala's to come to Aruba and find that transplanted evidence that we all know is in the third pond.

Sheesh.  I'm sorry, but that implication just doesn't strike me as plausible.

Yep, unbelieveble. Someone who would bring on such a story i found not credible anymore.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #788 12/31/08 -
Post by: ldstlou on December 31, 2008, 03:28:18 PM
Quote
Remember Hotshot (Kathy Drenga) just recently told the monkeys that it was HER who directed Caps (and the witness) to Silvetti.
 
Could this REALLY be the first sign to prove the suspicions that Silvetti gave something from that trap to be put in the pond?  Shoe?  Skull? - speculation.  




Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #788 12/31/08 -
Post by: jen3560 on December 31, 2008, 03:28:28 PM


Maybe is crap, but didn't Kyle himself raise the issue of Silvetti's loyalties which I believe is why he's in hot water.

Yes, he certainly did.  He told us in no uncertain terms that he felt Silvetti's intentions began as honorable - but that his focus shifted.

Also that Silvetti didn't want to question ALE about their insistence the cage was "not relevant" for fear of ruining newly made friendships and contacts.  Because Silvetti had plans to open an office on the island and do business in S America and Aruba.

FWIW - Kyle also never, ever believed in this whole pond witness thing, until the very end when we were wanting to publish our document containing the cage images and Kyle's words.

Then all of a sudden he says the pond witness is "credible", and Silvetti is, after all, "trustworthy".


I took that with a whole dumptruck of salt.


AND, as I recall - his sudden "about face" came out of nowhere.  After he had been absent from the forum for, ummm, two months or so?  We were like WTF?

Right.

After he had been to Egypt and the North Sea for Silvetti.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #788 12/31/08 -
Post by: SunnyinTX on December 31, 2008, 03:28:45 PM
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/3032507/

At least 53 dead in Bangkok nightclub fire, police say


Are we sure Joran is in fact in Laos now?

 ::MonkeyWaa:: ::MonkeyWaa::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #788 12/31/08 -
Post by: Anna on December 31, 2008, 03:29:23 PM
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/3032507/

At least 53 dead in Bangkok nightclub fire, police say


Are we sure Joran is in fact in Laos now?

Sorry for the OT, but I just noticed your disclaimer in the bottom of your post.  I love it! ::MonkeyHaHa::


Well, I just think it is better than claiming all manner of inside, secret information.

And SNOOPY, yes it certainly is fubar,



Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #788 12/31/08 -
Post by: jen3560 on December 31, 2008, 03:29:47 PM
Quote
Remember Hotshot (Kathy Drenga) just recently told the monkeys that it was HER who directed Caps (and the witness) to Silvetti.
 
Could this REALLY be the first sign to prove the suspicions that Silvetti gave something from that trap to be put in the pond?  Shoe?  Skull? - speculation.  




thanks for bumping that ldstlou.

Speculation being the key word there, I believe.  No accusations like you have suggested.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #788 12/31/08 -
Post by: ldstlou on December 31, 2008, 03:31:22 PM


Maybe is crap, but didn't Kyle himself raise the issue of Silvetti's loyalties which I believe is why he's in hot water.

Yes, he certainly did.  He told us in no uncertain terms that he felt Silvetti's intentions began as honorable - but that his focus shifted.

Also that Silvetti didn't want to question ALE about their insistence the cage was "not relevant" for fear of ruining newly made friendships and contacts.  Because Silvetti had plans to open an office on the island and do business in S America and Aruba.

FWIW - Kyle also never, ever believed in this whole pond witness thing, until the very end when we were wanting to publish our document containing the cage images and Kyle's words.

Then all of a sudden he says the pond witness is "credible", and Silvetti is, after all, "trustworthy".


I took that with a whole dumptruck of salt.


AND, as I recall - his sudden "about face" came out of nowhere.  After he had been absent from the forum for, ummm, two months or so?  We were like WTF?

wingnut, see this is what irks me...you tell half truths for your own agenda. He was gone for 2 months because he was on a ship in Egypt for crying out loud...why make it out to be anything more than it was?


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #788 12/31/08 -
Post by: klaasend on December 31, 2008, 03:31:54 PM
If people think it's a diversion why not speak up and explain why?No one has!I'll wait to hear why this is a diversion..Anyone???Please explain the diversion to the slow people who are not in the know so to speak.TIA

Keepthefaith...Not sure why you don't get it...Ado did, probably because you are so busy trying to stir up the damn pot with your posts. And boy have you made a lot of them since November 18th...there is that darn date again...Oh My!

Happy New Year's!

Please explain of what significance November 18, 2008 has?  KeeptheFaith has been a member of SM for over a year now.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #788 12/31/08 -
Post by: Keepthefaith on December 31, 2008, 03:32:04 PM
If people think it's a diversion why not speak up and explain why?No one has!I'll wait to hear why this is a diversion..Anyone???Please explain the diversion to the slow people who are not in the know so to speak.TIA

Keepthefaith...Not sure why you don't get it...Ado did, probably because you are so busy trying to stir up the damn pot with your posts. And boy have you made a lot of them since November 18th...there is that darn date again...Oh My!

Happy New Year's!

I'm Simply not as Knowledgable as some but to insinuate i'm stirring up the pot is pretty unfortunate.Personnally attacking me doesn't bother me!I don't know what the diversion is?I'm stirring the pot From Seattle,in my store,for what reason.Please do explain my motivation Mum??

Mum???? ::MonkeyCool::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #788 12/31/08 -
Post by: truthseeker2 on December 31, 2008, 03:32:05 PM
Quote
. . John Silvetti moved the contents of the trap to the pond and was working with the ALE to hide evidence that was in that trap.

Now what in the world could be the reason for Silvetti to do that?!
Who is buying that crap ::MonkeyNoNo::

Not me.  This is where some credibility began to wear thin.  imho.

Truthseeker2.As you are an analyst and i am not.Please explain as to why i shouldn't believe Kermit??No one as of yet has refutted with any clarity as to why anyhting Kermit is saying is untrue..

Well, what I see in the implication appears to be a supposition.  To analyze a supposition you need some level of fact in order to continue to support it. 

An example would be:

"I saw John Silvetti actually remove evidence from the trap"  "The next time I saw that evidence it was being placed into the pond".  Or even better "Thanks to a tip by an Aruban citizen evidence was found in the pond and testing indicates that the evidence had previously been in sea water"

You see, an eyewitness to this could establish the fact or the evidence having actually been located in the pond would help too.

Now, in the absence of any facts, I do not mean posts about how many ponds were discussed, or whether or not someone may have posted about a feeling they had, it is often helpful to focus on the result of the said conspiracy in order to prove a conspiracy ever existed.

So what were the results of this supposed conspiracy?  Did anyone find the evidence that they 'conspired' to move to a pond that is not even a pond anymore?  I don't think so.

Now we have two possible conclusions:
1.There was no conspiracy to move the evidence to a pond
2.Silvetti, ALE, CAPS, (and any others that may have been implicated in the possible conspiracy) truly suck at conspiring.

(Just between us, CAPS should have settled on one of the other ponds that wasn't as likely to dry up so quickly.   ::MonkeyWink::  )


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #788 12/31/08 -
Post by: bastibro on December 31, 2008, 03:33:14 PM
Klaasend,
Might Dana be interested in interviewing Tim Miller or John Silvetti about the retrieval of the contents of the cage?
Linda

Wow, that would solve a lot, to hear their story would give answers to a lot of the Monkey questions.
Also a huge bunch of rumours could be ruled out.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #788 12/31/08 -
Post by: SunnyinTX on December 31, 2008, 03:34:08 PM
Please fill me in on the latest with URINE...he is in Laos??


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #788 12/31/08 -
Post by: ldstlou on December 31, 2008, 03:34:30 PM
Quote
Remember Hotshot (Kathy Drenga) just recently told the monkeys that it was HER who directed Caps (and the witness) to Silvetti.
 
Could this REALLY be the first sign to prove the suspicions that Silvetti gave something from that trap to be put in the pond?  Shoe?  Skull? - speculation.  




thanks for bumping that ldstlou.

Speculation being the key word there, I believe.  No accusations like you have suggested.

I say slander.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #788 12/31/08 -
Post by: truthseeker2 on December 31, 2008, 03:35:24 PM

Mum,

I pop on every few days to catch up. I used to get involved with the discussions but for some time now, it seems to me, not much headway is being made. And I think the reason is the diversions that occur. It's as if someone or several people are watching SM and every so often they determine SM is on to something and they implement a diversion. Whoever he, she, or they are, they must be very satisfied with their most recent endeavor what with all the terse posts of late among the SMer's.

I agree with your comment "As far as I can see this cage business is the diversion".

My own opinion is; No body no case + incinerator operator suicide = no body. JMO

Ado

Your post reminds me of this:

Start with a cage containing five monkeys. In the cage, hang a banana on a string and put a set of stairs under it. Before long, a monkey will go to the stairs and start to climb towards the banana. As soon as he touches the stairs, spray all of the monkeys with cold water. After awhile, another monkey makes an attempt with the same result. Pretty soon, when any monkey tries to climb the stairs, the other monkeys will try to prevent it.
Now, turn off the cold water. Remove one monkey from the cage and replace it with a new one. The new monkey sees the banana and wants to climb the stairs. To his horror, all of the other monkeys attack him. After another attempt and attack, he knows that if he tries to climb the stairs, he will be assaulted.

Next, remove another of the original five monkeys and replace it with a new one. The newcomer goes to the stairs and is attacked. The previous newcomer takes part in the punishment with enthusiasm. Again, replace a third original monkey with a new one. The new one makes it to the stairs and is attacked as well. Two of the four monkeys that beat him have no idea why they were not permitted to climb the stairs, or why they are participating in the beating of the newest monkey.

After replacing the fourth and fifth original monkeys, all the monkeys which have been sprayed with cold water have been replaced. Nevertheless, no monkey ever again approaches the stairs. Why not? Because that's the way things are, now…


How insulting of you

Me?  This is a very old adage, Klaas.  It is applicable to many things.  And, yes it can reflect human behavior as well.  Sorry you found it insulting.  I didn't make up.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #788 12/31/08 -
Post by: Ree on December 31, 2008, 03:36:10 PM
Quote
. . John Silvetti moved the contents of the trap to the pond and was working with the ALE to hide evidence that was in that trap.

Now what in the world could be the reason for Silvetti to do that?!
Who is buying that crap ::MonkeyNoNo::

You state it wasn't found, but who looked?  CAPS was alluding the remains in these ponds, but has there actually been a credible search?  IIRC the original allegation was Silvetti was interested in hiding evidence in the cage to cover up his real motives for the ocean scan.  I know nothing about ocean scans and searching for oil, but I do know Kyle questioned his motives until he found out shooting off his mouth in a private forum could come back to bite him in the ass.

Not me.  This is where some credibility began to wear thin.  imho.

Maybe is crap, but didn't Kyle himself raise the issue of Silvetti's loyalties which I believe is why he's in hot water.

Ree, that statement that implies Silvetti and the ALE conspired to move evidence to another location...and oh, let me think here...uh...they moved it, but no one found where they moved it, which was to a pond that CAPS finally decided on after several attempts to pick a a proper pond to move it to, so that his witness would be giving the correct information to place Joran at that decided upon pond...with the transplanted evidence, that even now has not been 'found'....maybe they are waiting for Mum and Lala's to come to Aruba and find that transplanted evidence that we all know is in the third pond.

Sheesh.  I'm sorry, but that implication just doesn't strike me as plausible.

Yep, unbelieveble. Someone who would bring on such a story i found not credible anymore.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #788 12/31/08 -
Post by: ldstlou on December 31, 2008, 03:36:17 PM
Klaasend,
Might Dana be interested in interviewing Tim Miller or John Silvetti about the retrieval of the contents of the cage?
Linda

a voice of reason. I think that is a terrific idea!


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #788 12/31/08 -
Post by: klaasend on December 31, 2008, 03:38:19 PM


Maybe is crap, but didn't Kyle himself raise the issue of Silvetti's loyalties which I believe is why he's in hot water.

Yes, he certainly did.  He told us in no uncertain terms that he felt Silvetti's intentions began as honorable - but that his focus shifted.

Also that Silvetti didn't want to question ALE about their insistence the cage was "not relevant" for fear of ruining newly made friendships and contacts.  Because Silvetti had plans to open an office on the island and do business in S America and Aruba.

FWIW - Kyle also never, ever believed in this whole pond witness thing, until the very end when we were wanting to publish our document containing the cage images and Kyle's words.

Then all of a sudden he says the pond witness is "credible", and Silvetti is, after all, "trustworthy".


I took that with a whole dumptruck of salt.


AND, as I recall - his sudden "about face" came out of nowhere.  After he had been absent from the forum for, ummm, two months or so?  We were like WTF?

wingnut, see this is what irks me...you tell half truths for your own agenda. He was gone for 2 months because he was on a ship in Egypt for crying out loud...why make it out to be anything more than it was?

It appears Kyle had internet access while he was in Egypt, or at least it looks that way from his blog:

http://kylekingman.blogspot.com/

http://geosolutions.blogspot.com/


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #788 12/31/08 -
Post by: Ree on December 31, 2008, 03:39:42 PM
Quote
. . John Silvetti moved the contents of the trap to the pond and was working with the ALE to hide evidence that was in that trap.

Now what in the world could be the reason for Silvetti to do that?!
Who is buying that crap ::MonkeyNoNo::

You state it wasn't found, but who looked?  CAPS was alluding the remains in these ponds, but has there actually been a credible search?  IIRC the original allegation was Silvetti was interested in hiding evidence in the cage to cover up his real motives for the ocean scan.  I know nothing about ocean scans and searching for oil, but I do know Kyle questioned his motives until he found out shooting off his mouth in a private forum could come back to bite him in the ass.

Not me.  This is where some credibility began to wear thin.  imho.

Maybe is crap, but didn't Kyle himself raise the issue of Silvetti's loyalties which I believe is why he's in hot water.

Ree, that statement that implies Silvetti and the ALE conspired to move evidence to another location...and oh, let me think here...uh...they moved it, but no one found where they moved it, which was to a pond that CAPS finally decided on after several attempts to pick a a proper pond to move it to, so that his witness would be giving the correct information to place Joran at that decided upon pond...with the transplanted evidence, that even now has not been 'found'....maybe they are waiting for Mum and Lala's to come to Aruba and find that transplanted evidence that we all know is in the third pond.

Sheesh.  I'm sorry, but that implication just doesn't strike me as plausible.

Yep, unbelieveble. Someone who would bring on such a story i found not credible anymore.
Sorry, I botched that post.  You state it wasn't found, but who looked?  CAPS was alluding the remains in these ponds, but has there actually been a credible search?  IIRC the original allegation was Silvetti was interested in hiding evidence in the cage to cover up his real motives for the ocean scan.  I know nothing about ocean scans and searching for oil, but I do know Kyle questioned his motives until he found out shooting off his mouth in a private forum could come back to bite him in the ass.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #788 12/31/08 -
Post by: wingnut on December 31, 2008, 03:41:30 PM


Maybe is crap, but didn't Kyle himself raise the issue of Silvetti's loyalties which I believe is why he's in hot water.

Yes, he certainly did.  He told us in no uncertain terms that he felt Silvetti's intentions began as honorable - but that his focus shifted.

Also that Silvetti didn't want to question ALE about their insistence the cage was "not relevant" for fear of ruining newly made friendships and contacts.  Because Silvetti had plans to open an office on the island and do business in S America and Aruba.

FWIW - Kyle also never, ever believed in this whole pond witness thing, until the very end when we were wanting to publish our document containing the cage images and Kyle's words.

Then all of a sudden he says the pond witness is "credible", and Silvetti is, after all, "trustworthy".


I took that with a whole dumptruck of salt.


AND, as I recall - his sudden "about face" came out of nowhere.  After he had been absent from the forum for, ummm, two months or so?  We were like WTF?

wingnut, see this is what irks me...you tell half truths for your own agenda. He was gone for 2 months because he was on a ship in Egypt for crying out loud...why make it out to be anything more than it was?


Half truth implies Half lie.  I don't appreciate that.  I didn't imply anything other than that he didn't believe the witness, was gone for two months and came back with a completely different point of view.  Please do not put words in my mouth. 





Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #788 12/31/08 -
Post by: Keepthefaith on December 31, 2008, 03:42:33 PM
If people think it's a diversion why not speak up and explain why?No one has!I'll wait to hear why this is a diversion..Anyone???Please explain the diversion to the slow people who are not in the know so to speak.TIA

Keepthefaith...Not sure why you don't get it...Ado did, probably because you are so busy trying to stir up the damn pot with your posts. And boy have you made a lot of them since November 18th...there is that darn date again...Oh My!

Happy New Year's!

Please explain of what significance November 18, 2008 has?  KeeptheFaith has been a member of SM for over a year now.

Mum?? ::MonkeyCool::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #788 12/31/08 -
Post by: jen3560 on December 31, 2008, 03:42:36 PM


Maybe is crap, but didn't Kyle himself raise the issue of Silvetti's loyalties which I believe is why he's in hot water.

Yes, he certainly did.  He told us in no uncertain terms that he felt Silvetti's intentions began as honorable - but that his focus shifted.

Also that Silvetti didn't want to question ALE about their insistence the cage was "not relevant" for fear of ruining newly made friendships and contacts.  Because Silvetti had plans to open an office on the island and do business in S America and Aruba.

FWIW - Kyle also never, ever believed in this whole pond witness thing, until the very end when we were wanting to publish our document containing the cage images and Kyle's words.

Then all of a sudden he says the pond witness is "credible", and Silvetti is, after all, "trustworthy".


I took that with a whole dumptruck of salt.


AND, as I recall - his sudden "about face" came out of nowhere.  After he had been absent from the forum for, ummm, two months or so?  We were like WTF?

wingnut, see this is what irks me...you tell half truths for your own agenda. He was gone for 2 months because he was on a ship in Egypt for crying out loud...why make it out to be anything more than it was?

No - if you had read my letter, you would understand a bit better.

Kyle was "gone" for the most part since approximately MAY.

The final two months of that (Aug and Sept) was when he was out of the country.

No half truths in wingnut's post at all.

My follow up post to hers was just to point out what Kyle had been doing, and for whom, before his immediate about face regarding Silvetti and this witness.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #788 12/31/08 -
Post by: truthseeker2 on December 31, 2008, 03:42:50 PM
Please fill me in on the latest with URINE...he is in Laos??

Yes, the louse is in Laos.  Hanging out at some bars that appear to attack tourists.  (Some things never change)


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #788 12/31/08 -
Post by: ldstlou on December 31, 2008, 03:42:53 PM


Maybe is crap, but didn't Kyle himself raise the issue of Silvetti's loyalties which I believe is why he's in hot water.

Yes, he certainly did.  He told us in no uncertain terms that he felt Silvetti's intentions began as honorable - but that his focus shifted.

Also that Silvetti didn't want to question ALE about their insistence the cage was "not relevant" for fear of ruining newly made friendships and contacts.  Because Silvetti had plans to open an office on the island and do business in S America and Aruba.

FWIW - Kyle also never, ever believed in this whole pond witness thing, until the very end when we were wanting to publish our document containing the cage images and Kyle's words.

Then all of a sudden he says the pond witness is "credible", and Silvetti is, after all, "trustworthy".


I took that with a whole dumptruck of salt.

 After he had been absent from the forum for, ummm, two months or so?  We were like WTF?

wingnut, see this is what irks me...you tell half truths for your own agenda. He was gone for 2 months because he was on a ship in Egypt for crying out loud...why make it out to be anything more than it was?

It appears Kyle had internet access while he was in Egypt, or at least it looks that way from his blog:

http://kylekingman.blogspot.com/

http://geosolutions.blogspot.com/

yep, and it appears to me as though he was focused on the task at hand.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #788 12/31/08 -
Post by: klaasend on December 31, 2008, 03:45:26 PM
Klaasend,
Might Dana be interested in interviewing Tim Miller or John Silvetti about the retrieval of the contents of the cage?
Linda

a voice of reason. I think that is a terrific idea!

Email Dana with the suggestion:

dana@scaredmonkeys.com


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #788 12/31/08 -
Post by: Magnolia on December 31, 2008, 03:45:27 PM
Remember the 35 to 50 Dutch investigators.who were sent from Holland.
Both Kyle and Caps mentioned that and no one else saw hide nor hair of them.
What was that about?


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #788 12/31/08 -
Post by: jen3560 on December 31, 2008, 03:46:37 PM
truthseeker - you raise some very good points about evidence/pond/cage.

one question I have that maybe some monkeys could answer..................

wasn't there rumor going around about a shoe that WAS found at/near/in the pond?

I think something that Jossy had said?

Now - I may be confusing that with the shoes that were found in that rocky area - but my mind is telling me there was another rumor about a shoe having been found after the pond was "drained".


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #788 12/31/08 -
Post by: truthseeker2 on December 31, 2008, 03:46:47 PM
Quote
. . John Silvetti moved the contents of the trap to the pond and was working with the ALE to hide evidence that was in that trap.

Now what in the world could be the reason for Silvetti to do that?!
Who is buying that crap ::MonkeyNoNo::

You state it wasn't found, but who looked?  CAPS was alluding the remains in these ponds, but has there actually been a credible search?  IIRC the original allegation was Silvetti was interested in hiding evidence in the cage to cover up his real motives for the ocean scan.  I know nothing about ocean scans and searching for oil, but I do know Kyle questioned his motives until he found out shooting off his mouth in a private forum could come back to bite him in the ass.

Not me.  This is where some credibility began to wear thin.  imho.

Maybe is crap, but didn't Kyle himself raise the issue of Silvetti's loyalties which I believe is why he's in hot water.

Ree, that statement that implies Silvetti and the ALE conspired to move evidence to another location...and oh, let me think here...uh...they moved it, but no one found where they moved it, which was to a pond that CAPS finally decided on after several attempts to pick a a proper pond to move it to, so that his witness would be giving the correct information to place Joran at that decided upon pond...with the transplanted evidence, that even now has not been 'found'....maybe they are waiting for Mum and Lala's to come to Aruba and find that transplanted evidence that we all know is in the third pond.

Sheesh.  I'm sorry, but that implication just doesn't strike me as plausible.

Yep, unbelieveble. Someone who would bring on such a story i found not credible anymore.
Sorry, I botched that post.  You state it wasn't found, but who looked?  CAPS was alluding the remains in these ponds, but has there actually been a credible search?  IIRC the original allegation was Silvetti was interested in hiding evidence in the cage to cover up his real motives for the ocean scan.  I know nothing about ocean scans and searching for oil, but I do know Kyle questioned his motives until he found out shooting off his mouth in a private forum could come back to bite him in the ass.


Well, that pond is bone dry now.  Looks like someone was playing around out there, but no footprints, so they didn't play around out there until the ground was completely dry.  Has anyone heard about any evidence (planted or otherwise) being found in that dried up pond?  I haven't.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #788 12/31/08 -
Post by: jen3560 on December 31, 2008, 03:47:11 PM


It appears Kyle had internet access while he was in Egypt, or at least it looks that way from his blog:

http://kylekingman.blogspot.com/

http://geosolutions.blogspot.com/

Great point!


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #788 12/31/08 -
Post by: Ree on December 31, 2008, 03:47:33 PM
Remember the 35 to 50 Dutch investigators.who were sent from Holland.
Both Kyle and Caps mentioned that and no one else saw hide nor hair of them.
What was that about?


Where's Jossy and parts 2, 3, 4, etc?  If Jossy's son was on the dive recovery team, why aren't we hearing anything?


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #788 12/31/08 -
Post by: ldstlou on December 31, 2008, 03:47:35 PM


Maybe is crap, but didn't Kyle himself raise the issue of Silvetti's loyalties which I believe is why he's in hot water.

Yes, he certainly did.  He told us in no uncertain terms that he felt Silvetti's intentions began as honorable - but that his focus shifted.

Also that Silvetti didn't want to question ALE about their insistence the cage was "not relevant" for fear of ruining newly made friendships and contacts.  Because Silvetti had plans to open an office on the island and do business in S America and Aruba.

FWIW - Kyle also never, ever believed in this whole pond witness thing, until the very end when we were wanting to publish our document containing the cage images and Kyle's words.

Then all of a sudden he says the pond witness is "credible", and Silvetti is, after all, "trustworthy".


I took that with a whole dumptruck of salt.


AND, as I recall - his sudden "about face" came out of nowhere.  After he had been absent from the forum for, ummm, two months or so?  We were like WTF?

wingnut, see this is what irks me...you tell half truths for your own agenda. He was gone for 2 months because he was on a ship in Egypt for crying out loud...why make it out to be anything more than it was?

No - if you had read my letter, you would understand a bit better.

Kyle was "gone" for the most part since approximately MAY.

The final two months of that (Aug and Sept) was when he was out of the country.

No half truths in wingnut's post at all.

My follow up post to hers was just to point out what Kyle had been doing, and for whom, before his immediate about face regarding Silvetti and this witness.

So why can't he change his mind about John Silvetti? Why is that an untruth and conspiracy because in hindsight after emotions have died down and he had time to reflect upon what happened and he decides he over reacted in regards to his concerns...that you call FACTS...why is that "about face" so unbelievable...because it ruined your conspiracy?


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #788 12/31/08 -
Post by: truthseeker2 on December 31, 2008, 03:47:57 PM
truthseeker - you raise some very good points about evidence/pond/cage.

one question I have that maybe some monkeys could answer..................

wasn't there rumor going around about a shoe that WAS found at/near/in the pond?

I think something that Jossy had said?

Now - I may be confusing that with the shoes that were found in that rocky area - but my mind is telling me there was another rumor about a shoe having been found after the pond was "drained".

Didn't hear it if there was one.  Maybe another monkey could help you with that.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #788 12/31/08 -
Post by: wreck on December 31, 2008, 03:47:58 PM
I would like to know how Lisa purports to know what Kyle posted or did not post in Freebirds. 3 actual members (Kermit, wingnut, and jen) relay what/when he actually posted. Kyle doesn't refute what they say to anyone but Lisa or Hotshot. I can understand you believing any and everything Kyle tells you personally -- but to totally dismiss what people WHO WERE THERE (Freebirds) say is simply putting your head in the sand.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #788 12/31/08 -
Post by: jen3560 on December 31, 2008, 03:48:37 PM
Remember the 35 to 50 Dutch investigators.who were sent from Holland.
Both Kyle and Caps mentioned that and no one else saw hide nor hair of them.
What was that about?


Kyle told us that was nothing to do with the pond search that was/wasn't did/didn't go on at that time.

He said he believed those folks were there for the purpose of an investigation into the investigation.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #788 12/31/08 -
Post by: Ree on December 31, 2008, 03:48:55 PM
Quote
. . John Silvetti moved the contents of the trap to the pond and was working with the ALE to hide evidence that was in that trap.

Now what in the world could be the reason for Silvetti to do that?!
Who is buying that crap ::MonkeyNoNo::

You state it wasn't found, but who looked?  CAPS was alluding the remains in these ponds, but has there actually been a credible search?  IIRC the original allegation was Silvetti was interested in hiding evidence in the cage to cover up his real motives for the ocean scan.  I know nothing about ocean scans and searching for oil, but I do know Kyle questioned his motives until he found out shooting off his mouth in a private forum could come back to bite him in the ass.

Not me.  This is where some credibility began to wear thin.  imho.

Maybe is crap, but didn't Kyle himself raise the issue of Silvetti's loyalties which I believe is why he's in hot water.

Ree, that statement that implies Silvetti and the ALE conspired to move evidence to another location...and oh, let me think here...uh...they moved it, but no one found where they moved it, which was to a pond that CAPS finally decided on after several attempts to pick a a proper pond to move it to, so that his witness would be giving the correct information to place Joran at that decided upon pond...with the transplanted evidence, that even now has not been 'found'....maybe they are waiting for Mum and Lala's to come to Aruba and find that transplanted evidence that we all know is in the third pond.

Sheesh.  I'm sorry, but that implication just doesn't strike me as plausible.

Yep, unbelieveble. Someone who would bring on such a story i found not credible anymore.
Sorry, I botched that post.  You state it wasn't found, but who looked?  CAPS was alluding the remains in these ponds, but has there actually been a credible search?  IIRC the original allegation was Silvetti was interested in hiding evidence in the cage to cover up his real motives for the ocean scan.  I know nothing about ocean scans and searching for oil, but I do know Kyle questioned his motives until he found out shooting off his mouth in a private forum could come back to bite him in the ass.


Well, that pond is bone dry now.  Looks like someone was playing around out there, but no footprints, so they didn't play around out there until the ground was completely dry.  Has anyone heard about any evidence (planted or otherwise) being found in that dried up pond?  I haven't.

I don't know.  Perhaps our mystery investigators from Holland took it to turn it into chocolate.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #788 12/31/08 -
Post by: ldstlou on December 31, 2008, 03:49:06 PM


It appears Kyle had internet access while he was in Egypt, or at least it looks that way from his blog:

http://kylekingman.blogspot.com/

http://geosolutions.blogspot.com/

Great point!

so did you contact him Jen? Guy dissappears for 2 months while you are compiling your "findings" and you didn't want to contact him or run any of your ideas past him? hmmmmm


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #788 12/31/08 -
Post by: texasmom on December 31, 2008, 03:49:19 PM
Subject: Caps

I have asked repeatedly for many months for those who doubt Caps to tell me the reasons why.  Show me some proof he's not who he claims to be or from where he claims to be from.  I've never received any proof that he is not who he claims to be, or that he is only here as a diversion.  The only things that were posted about these doubts in many instances I found to be as cryptic as some of Caps posts.  From my own communications with him fairly recently, I started to have my own doubts about some things.  Basically how he knew certain things, and how that information changed from what he'd already told me.  

I only want the truth. I want to know what happened to Natalee, where she is, and for her to be brought home.  Justice for her and her family would be the utmost, but I doubt that will ever happen.

In the past I have stood up for Caps when the basis of doubts was a post he made on the seven sins, the post was obviously cut and pasted from somewhere else.  The claim was that because of that post Caps was a master of the English language and was deceiving us all with his usual somewhat broken English way of speaking.  That was not proof in my opinion.  This was not the only time I stood by him, there were others.  Each time I was attacked for defending him; but was never provided any information that proved that Caps was/is deceiving us.  If there is information that proves that Caps is not from Aruba, is not who he claims to be; and that he was involved in a conspiracy...I would like to know about it.  Please!

From Caps own admissions I know he met with John Silvetti, from my understanding this is what he believed Dave Holloway wanted him to do.  From my understanding Caps has never communicated with Dave Holloway other than through email, although he provided other means for Dave to contact him.  Caps has also told me that he never met or had dealings with anyone else on the Persistence.  From my perspective of my discussions with Caps and what I have read here, I believe there is a possibility that he and his information was used to further the agenda of others.

I have read Caps original logic report that was sent to some in January from what I can tell.  I have only received and read it in the past few months.  From my understanding he researched the logic of Natalee being placed in all of the ponds that have been mentioned, the most logical conclusion to the research was that she was placed in the pond at Monserat.

I've checked the sitemeter before too, and know that there were times that he was here and Aruba did show up.  

I have a lot of questions, and I also have an open mind.  I want any and all information that is known to help me decide if I was duped/conned or whatever.  What I have said in the past was my belief from the information I had.  So far I don't have any information that convinces me otherwise.

I will repeat this because this is why I am here.

I only want the truth. I want to know what happened to Natalee, where she is, and for her to be brought home.  Justice for her and her family would be the utmost, but I doubt that will ever happen.






  

 


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #788 12/31/08 -
Post by: Keepthefaith on December 31, 2008, 03:51:05 PM
I would like to know how Lisa purports to know what Kyle posted or did not post in Freebirds. 3 actual members (Kermit, wingnut, and jen) relay what/when he actually posted. Kyle doesn't refute what they say to anyone but Lisa or Hotshot. I can understand you believing any and everything Kyle tells you personally -- but to totally dismiss what people WHO WERE THERE (Freebirds) say is simply putting your head in the sand.

Much agree Wreck!I'm still trying to understand how one argue's For Kyle in terms of his state of mind when his words are his state of mind??Only Kyle knows and his words say what he thinks...if that makes any sense?


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #788 12/31/08 -
Post by: Blonde on December 31, 2008, 03:52:11 PM
Blonde,

You made a post in the last thread about Caps posting, and a lack of Aruban people on the meter.

Just wanted you to know there were others who noticed that as well.  On numerous occasions.  ::MonkeyCool::

I have about 20 in my documents. I have even sent klaas one. From Aruba.


You can get a progran hide the IP and it will show everyone your posting from where ever you want. I know this for a fact, because I had it on my old computer.


Very interesting.

I had the one you pay for, http://www.hide-the-ip.com/


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #788 12/31/08 -
Post by: Magnolia on December 31, 2008, 03:52:48 PM
Remember the 35 to 50 Dutch investigators.who were sent from Holland.
Both Kyle and Caps mentioned that and no one else saw hide nor hair of them.
What was that about?


Where's Jossy and parts 2, 3, 4, etc?  If Jossy's son was on the dive recovery team, why aren't we hearing anything?

Jossy never said there were other parts.  Only Caps said that.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #788 12/31/08 -
Post by: klaasend on December 31, 2008, 03:52:59 PM
I would like to know how Lisa purports to know what Kyle posted or did not post in Freebirds. 3 actual members (Kermit, wingnut, and jen) relay what/when he actually posted. Kyle doesn't refute what they say to anyone but Lisa or Hotshot. I can understand you believing any and everything Kyle tells you personally -- but to totally dismiss what people WHO WERE THERE (Freebirds) say is simply putting your head in the sand.

Yep


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #788 12/31/08 -
Post by: truthseeker2 on December 31, 2008, 03:53:12 PM
Remember the 35 to 50 Dutch investigators.who were sent from Holland.
Both Kyle and Caps mentioned that and no one else saw hide nor hair of them.
What was that about?


Where's Jossy and parts 2, 3, 4, etc?  If Jossy's son was on the dive recovery team, why aren't we hearing anything?

Good question.  I asked a similar question last night.  I would like to hear what Eduardo thinks about the contents of the trap from his vantage point.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #788 12/31/08 -
Post by: jen3560 on December 31, 2008, 03:54:31 PM


So why can't he change his mind about John Silvetti? Why is that an untruth and conspiracy because in hindsight after emotions have died down and he had time to reflect upon what happened and he decides he over reacted in regards to his concerns...that you call FACTS...why is that "about face" so unbelievable...because it ruined your conspiracy?

Look lady - I don't know who you are, and I don't really care.  But what you're calling MY conspiracy is not mine at all.

They are KYLE's beliefs, KYLE's words, and KYLE's concerns - and those are all separate from the FACTS Kyle shared with us as well.

And what's rather comical about this post of yours is - the fact that Kyle KNOWS Silvetti was self serving when that trap was found, and the fact that Kyle BELIEVED that witness to be full of crap, but then comes back and tells us differently after working for Silvetti, only re-enforced the questions in my mind about something hinky going on between John and this witness.

Not the other way around like you posted.



Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #788 12/31/08 -
Post by: Anna on December 31, 2008, 03:55:15 PM
Anna,

You have made some excellent points the last few pages.

The point here is - what happened to the items Aruba recovered from that trap?

What can we all do to get an investigation into this?

Tim Miller and Kyle Kingman both believe there were human remains in that trap.

The rest of us weren't there -we can only go by their words and beliefs, and the images Kyle shared.



And Tim Miller was away on Jan 7 when the contents were recovered by ALE.




Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #788 12/31/08 -
Post by: Keepthefaith on December 31, 2008, 03:55:53 PM
Thanx Truthseeker2.Forgot to respond to the last response. Will stand with the Frog until the finality then take my thoughts from there.If i'm wrong i will Eat crow then bury my head in the sand rightfully so... ::MonkeyDance::.Until then.Ribbit...


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #788 12/31/08 -
Post by: jen3560 on December 31, 2008, 03:56:20 PM



so did you contact him Jen? Guy dissappears for 2 months while you are compiling your "findings" and you didn't want to contact him or run any of your ideas past him? hmmmmm

You really don't read many posts, do you?

Read my letter again.  All the answers to that question are in it.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #788 12/31/08 -
Post by: ldstlou on December 31, 2008, 03:56:26 PM
I would like to know how Lisa purports to know what Kyle posted or did not post in Freebirds. 3 actual members (Kermit, wingnut, and jen) relay what/when he actually posted. Kyle doesn't refute what they say to anyone but Lisa or Hotshot. I can understand you believing any and everything Kyle tells you personally -- but to totally dismiss what people WHO WERE THERE (Freebirds) say is simply putting your head in the sand.

I didn't dismiss anything Wreck. I simply asked Kyle questions. I said before, Kyle walked away with some concerns about the conduct of the Arubans and some strange coincidences that went on. I can understand that perfectly. He didn't hide those concerns...how in the heck did the Freebirds get the info if he was hiding it? He discussed the concerns with them! How do we go from he had some questions as to what transpired via the ALE...to yesterday Kermit states the suspicions are that John Silvetti removed evidence from the trap and placed it in the pond?


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #788 12/31/08 -
Post by: San on December 31, 2008, 03:56:39 PM
I would like to know how Lisa purports to know what Kyle posted or did not post in Freebirds. 3 actual members (Kermit, wingnut, and jen) relay what/when he actually posted. Kyle doesn't refute what they say to anyone but Lisa or Hotshot. I can understand you believing any and everything Kyle tells you personally -- but to totally dismiss what people WHO WERE THERE (Freebirds) say is simply putting your head in the sand.

Much agree Wreck!I'm still trying to understand how one argue's For Kyle in terms of his state of mind when his words are his state of mind??Only Kyle knows and his words say what he thinks...if that makes any sense?

Telepathy.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #788 12/31/08 -
Post by: jen3560 on December 31, 2008, 03:59:34 PM
Anna,

You have made some excellent points the last few pages.

The point here is - what happened to the items Aruba recovered from that trap?

What can we all do to get an investigation into this?

Tim Miller and Kyle Kingman both believe there were human remains in that trap.

The rest of us weren't there -we can only go by their words and beliefs, and the images Kyle shared.



And Tim Miller was away on Jan 7 when the contents were recovered by ALE.




Right!  There was no one aboard the Persistence on that date other than Persistence crew.

ALE divers didn't even board.  They approached from, dove from, and returned to their own boat.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #788 12/31/08 -
Post by: bastibro on December 31, 2008, 04:00:39 PM
(http://i272.photobucket.com/albums/jj176/bastibro/career-builder-monkey-pointer.jpg)


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #788 12/31/08 -
Post by: klaasend on December 31, 2008, 04:01:47 PM



so did you contact him Jen? Guy dissappears for 2 months while you are compiling your "findings" and you didn't want to contact him or run any of your ideas past him? hmmmmm

You really don't read many posts, do you?

Read my letter again.  All the answers to that question are in it.

I see this alot, people jumping the gun before actually reading what was said. 


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #788 12/31/08 -
Post by: ldstlou on December 31, 2008, 04:02:18 PM


So why can't he change his mind about John Silvetti? Why is that an untruth and conspiracy because in hindsight after emotions have died down and he had time to reflect upon what happened and he decides he over reacted in regards to his concerns...that you call FACTS...why is that "about face" so unbelievable...because it ruined your conspiracy?

Look lady - I don't know who you are, and I don't really care.  But what you're calling MY conspiracy is not mine at all.

They are KYLE's beliefs, KYLE's words, and KYLE's concerns - and those are all separate from the FACTS Kyle shared with us as well.

And what's rather comical about this post of yours is - the fact that Kyle KNOWS Silvetti was self serving when that trap was found, and the fact that Kyle BELIEVED that witness to be full of crap, but then comes back and tells us differently after working for Silvetti, only re-enforced the questions in my mind about something hinky going on between John and this witness.

Not the other way around like you posted.



so you got a "hinky feeling" That is not PROOF of the conspiracy you are putting out here.

And really what you should have said is "YOU believe Kyle believed". Because you just said he stated he doesn't believes that now.

It's all pure speculation on your part.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #788 12/31/08 -
Post by: Angiex911dsptchr on December 31, 2008, 04:02:41 PM
I would like to know how Lisa purports to know what Kyle posted or did not post in Freebirds. 3 actual members (Kermit, wingnut, and jen) relay what/when he actually posted. Kyle doesn't refute what they say to anyone but Lisa or Hotshot. I can understand you believing any and everything Kyle tells you personally -- but to totally dismiss what people WHO WERE THERE (Freebirds) say is simply putting your head in the sand.

Ummm.. make it 4 now...  ::MonkeyCool::

I been reading several pages.. and YES.. I read and seen it all. So.. I can say in all honesty.. I cak up 100% what Kermit, Jen and Wingnut are posting. I love yah all here at SM and also the folks at freebirds. I may as well resign from there now that I suppose I outed myself as well. I didnt do a whole hell of alot there. I really didnt have time due to work. I read all what Kyle has posted and PLEASE people.. listen to Kermit..Jen and Wingnut.

Now.. I guess I differed this thread.. lol  Anyhow.. I really need to go and get a shower and get the hell out of the house~!

Have a Happy New Year everyone !!

Jen and Wing.. I apologize.. but reading page after page after page.. I wanted others to know you guys are not full of shit !!
 ::MonkeyCool::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #788 12/31/08 -
Post by: wingnut on December 31, 2008, 04:02:59 PM


It appears Kyle had internet access while he was in Egypt, or at least it looks that way from his blog:

http://kylekingman.blogspot.com/

http://geosolutions.blogspot.com/

Great point!

so did you contact him Jen? Guy dissappears for 2 months while you are compiling your "findings" and you didn't want to contact him or run any of your ideas past him? hmmmmm


Are you implying that something nefarious was taking place?  Kyle contacted us in order for the Freebirds to disseminate the information in a controlled manner.  HIS words.  That's what we were doing. 


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #788 12/31/08 -
Post by: Keepthefaith on December 31, 2008, 04:04:25 PM
I would like to know how Lisa purports to know what Kyle posted or did not post in Freebirds. 3 actual members (Kermit, wingnut, and jen) relay what/when he actually posted. Kyle doesn't refute what they say to anyone but Lisa or Hotshot. I can understand you believing any and everything Kyle tells you personally -- but to totally dismiss what people WHO WERE THERE (Freebirds) say is simply putting your head in the sand.

Ummm.. make it 4 now...  ::MonkeyCool::

I been reading several pages.. and YES.. I read and seen it all. So.. I can say in all honesty.. I cak up 100% what Kermit, Jen and Wingnut are posting. I love yah all here at SM and also the folks at freebirds. I may as well resign from there now that I suppose I outed myself as well. I didnt do a whole hell of alot there. I really didnt have time due to work. I read all what Kyle has posted and PLEASE people.. listen to Kermit..Jen and Wingnut.

Now.. I guess I differed this thread.. lol  Anyhow.. I really need to go and get a shower and get the hell out of the house~!

Have a Happy New Year everyone !!

Jen and Wing.. I apologize.. but reading page after page after page.. I wanted others to know you guys are not full of shit !!
 ::MonkeyCool::

Thank you Angie...I for one appreciate it!


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #788 12/31/08 -
Post by: jen3560 on December 31, 2008, 04:05:35 PM


So why can't he change his mind about John Silvetti? Why is that an untruth and conspiracy because in hindsight after emotions have died down and he had time to reflect upon what happened and he decides he over reacted in regards to his concerns...that you call FACTS...why is that "about face" so unbelievable...because it ruined your conspiracy?

Look lady - I don't know who you are, and I don't really care.  But what you're calling MY conspiracy is not mine at all.

They are KYLE's beliefs, KYLE's words, and KYLE's concerns - and those are all separate from the FACTS Kyle shared with us as well.

And what's rather comical about this post of yours is - the fact that Kyle KNOWS Silvetti was self serving when that trap was found, and the fact that Kyle BELIEVED that witness to be full of crap, but then comes back and tells us differently after working for Silvetti, only re-enforced the questions in my mind about something hinky going on between John and this witness.

Not the other way around like you posted.



so you got a "hinky feeling" That is not PROOF of the conspiracy you are putting out here.

And really what you should have said is "YOU believe Kyle believed". Because you just said he stated he doesn't believes that now.

It's all pure speculation on your part.

You're not even making sense any more.  I would suggest you go back and carefully re-read everything that has been posted by Kermit, wingnut and myself about what Kyle has said.

That really might be helpful to you.

Including my letter that clearly stated - NONE of Kyle's words that have been posted here were taken out of context.

Best of luck to you - I'm not playing your games any more.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #788 12/31/08 -
Post by: jen3560 on December 31, 2008, 04:06:34 PM



so did you contact him Jen? Guy dissappears for 2 months while you are compiling your "findings" and you didn't want to contact him or run any of your ideas past him? hmmmmm

You really don't read many posts, do you?

Read my letter again.  All the answers to that question are in it.

I see this alot, people jumping the gun before actually reading what was said. 

I think that might be the cause of the majority of her confusion.  :smt102


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #788 12/31/08 -
Post by: Keepthefaith on December 31, 2008, 04:06:57 PM
Heyyyy.I thought i was the one stirring the pot.... ::MonkeyDance:: ::MonkeyDance::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #788 12/31/08 -
Post by: Magnolia on December 31, 2008, 04:07:09 PM
I would like to know how Lisa purports to know what Kyle posted or did not post in Freebirds. 3 actual members (Kermit, wingnut, and jen) relay what/when he actually posted. Kyle doesn't refute what they say to anyone but Lisa or Hotshot. I can understand you believing any and everything Kyle tells you personally -- but to totally dismiss what people WHO WERE THERE (Freebirds) say is simply putting your head in the sand.

Ummm.. make it 4 now...  ::MonkeyCool::

I been reading several pages.. and YES.. I read and seen it all. So.. I can say in all honesty.. I cak up 100% what Kermit, Jen and Wingnut are posting. I love yah all here at SM and also the folks at freebirds. I may as well resign from there now that I suppose I outed myself as well. I didnt do a whole hell of alot there. I really didnt have time due to work. I read all what Kyle has posted and PLEASE people.. listen to Kermit..Jen and Wingnut.

Now.. I guess I differed this thread.. lol  Anyhow.. I really need to go and get a shower and get the hell out of the house~!

Have a Happy New Year everyone !!

Jen and Wing.. I apologize.. but reading page after page after page.. I wanted others to know you guys are not full of shit !!
 ::MonkeyCool::

Awwww,  so good to see you, Angie.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #788 12/31/08 -
Post by: ldstlou on December 31, 2008, 04:07:51 PM


It appears Kyle had internet access while he was in Egypt, or at least it looks that way from his blog:

http://kylekingman.blogspot.com/

http://geosolutions.blogspot.com/

Great point!

so did you contact him Jen? Guy dissappears for 2 months while you are compiling your "findings" and you didn't want to contact him or run any of your ideas past him? hmmmmm


Are you implying that something nefarious was taking place?  Kyle contacted us in order for the Freebirds to disseminate the information in a controlled manner.  HIS words.  That's what we were doing. 

oh...a "controlled manner" gotcha!


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #788 12/31/08 -
Post by: wreck on December 31, 2008, 04:07:54 PM
I would like to know how Lisa purports to know what Kyle posted or did not post in Freebirds. 3 actual members (Kermit, wingnut, and jen) relay what/when he actually posted. Kyle doesn't refute what they say to anyone but Lisa or Hotshot. I can understand you believing any and everything Kyle tells you personally -- but to totally dismiss what people WHO WERE THERE (Freebirds) say is simply putting your head in the sand.

Ummm.. make it 4 now...  ::MonkeyCool::

I been reading several pages.. and YES.. I read and seen it all. So.. I can say in all honesty.. I cak up 100% what Kermit, Jen and Wingnut are posting. I love yah all here at SM and also the folks at freebirds. I may as well resign from there now that I suppose I outed myself as well. I didnt do a whole hell of alot there. I really didnt have time due to work. I read all what Kyle has posted and PLEASE people.. listen to Kermit..Jen and Wingnut.

Now.. I guess I differed this thread.. lol  Anyhow.. I really need to go and get a shower and get the hell out of the house~!

Have a Happy New Year everyone !!

Jen and Wing.. I apologize.. but reading page after page after page.. I wanted others to know you guys are not full of shit !!
 ::MonkeyCool::
Great to see you Angie! Do you ever talk to robots?


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #788 12/31/08 -
Post by: klaasend on December 31, 2008, 04:07:54 PM
Hi Angie!  Happy New Year to you!


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #788 12/31/08 -
Post by: jen3560 on December 31, 2008, 04:07:57 PM
Ang honey!!  Love you dear!

Hope your New Year's is GREAT!!!


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #788 12/31/08 -
Post by: Ree on December 31, 2008, 04:08:30 PM
I would like to know how Lisa purports to know what Kyle posted or did not post in Freebirds. 3 actual members (Kermit, wingnut, and jen) relay what/when he actually posted. Kyle doesn't refute what they say to anyone but Lisa or Hotshot. I can understand you believing any and everything Kyle tells you personally -- but to totally dismiss what people WHO WERE THERE (Freebirds) say is simply putting your head in the sand.

I didn't dismiss anything Wreck. I simply asked Kyle questions. I said before, Kyle walked away with some concerns about the conduct of the Arubans and some strange coincidences that went on. I can understand that perfectly. He didn't hide those concerns...how in the heck did the Freebirds get the info if he was hiding it? He discussed the concerns with them! How do we go from he had some questions as to what transpired via the ALE...to yesterday Kermit states the suspicions are that John Silvetti removed evidence from the trap and placed it in the pond?

He may have discussed his concerns with them, but he did NOT share the evidence with the family or the FBI in a timely manner.  I don't give a rats ass whose job it was.  He knew it hadn't been done and he himself stated he believed it was human remains.  Therefore it was his responsibility to make sure that it was reported to the authorities.  Rest assured that if we come across a crime, I will not trust that you will report it.  I will see to it that it is done.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #788 12/31/08 -
Post by: SunnyinTX on December 31, 2008, 04:08:53 PM
Please fill me in on the latest with URINE...he is in Laos??

Yes, the louse is in Laos.  Hanging out at some bars that appear to attack tourists.  (Some things never change)

I really can't believe someone hasn't beat the crap  out of him yet.....and disappear his body


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #788 12/31/08 -
Post by: texasmom on December 31, 2008, 04:09:09 PM
I would like to know how Lisa purports to know what Kyle posted or did not post in Freebirds. 3 actual members (Kermit, wingnut, and jen) relay what/when he actually posted. Kyle doesn't refute what they say to anyone but Lisa or Hotshot. I can understand you believing any and everything Kyle tells you personally -- but to totally dismiss what people WHO WERE THERE (Freebirds) say is simply putting your head in the sand.

Ummm.. make it 4 now...  ::MonkeyCool::

I been reading several pages.. and YES.. I read and seen it all. So.. I can say in all honesty.. I cak up 100% what Kermit, Jen and Wingnut are posting. I love yah all here at SM and also the folks at freebirds. I may as well resign from there now that I suppose I outed myself as well. I didnt do a whole hell of alot there. I really didnt have time due to work. I read all what Kyle has posted and PLEASE people.. listen to Kermit..Jen and Wingnut.

Now.. I guess I differed this thread.. lol  Anyhow.. I really need to go and get a shower and get the hell out of the house~!

Have a Happy New Year everyone !!

Jen and Wing.. I apologize.. but reading page after page after page.. I wanted others to know you guys are not full of shit !!
 ::MonkeyCool::

Thanks Angie, and good to see you!!!!  ::MonkeyCool::

I appreciate your doing this, but I had no doubts about wingnut and jen's sincerity.

Happy New Year!!!!


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #788 12/31/08 -
Post by: wingnut on December 31, 2008, 04:09:24 PM
I would like to know how Lisa purports to know what Kyle posted or did not post in Freebirds. 3 actual members (Kermit, wingnut, and jen) relay what/when he actually posted. Kyle doesn't refute what they say to anyone but Lisa or Hotshot. I can understand you believing any and everything Kyle tells you personally -- but to totally dismiss what people WHO WERE THERE (Freebirds) say is simply putting your head in the sand.

Ummm.. make it 4 now...  ::MonkeyCool::

I been reading several pages.. and YES.. I read and seen it all. So.. I can say in all honesty.. I cak up 100% what Kermit, Jen and Wingnut are posting. I love yah all here at SM and also the folks at freebirds. I may as well resign from there now that I suppose I outed myself as well. I didnt do a whole hell of alot there. I really didnt have time due to work. I read all what Kyle has posted and PLEASE people.. listen to Kermit..Jen and Wingnut.

Now.. I guess I differed this thread.. lol  Anyhow.. I really need to go and get a shower and get the hell out of the house~!

Have a Happy New Year everyone !!

Jen and Wing.. I apologize.. but reading page after page after page.. I wanted others to know you guys are not full of shit !!
 ::MonkeyCool::


Hey Ang!  You did more than you know.  There were many times that you held me up.  I hope you have a FAB New Year.  You deserve it more than most.

Love ya Sistah!


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #788 12/31/08 -
Post by: Anna on December 31, 2008, 04:09:48 PM
Angie, Happy New Year to you and ALL the MONKEYS!


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #788 12/31/08 -
Post by: wingnut on December 31, 2008, 04:11:22 PM


It appears Kyle had internet access while he was in Egypt, or at least it looks that way from his blog:

http://kylekingman.blogspot.com/

http://geosolutions.blogspot.com/

Great point!

so did you contact him Jen? Guy dissappears for 2 months while you are compiling your "findings" and you didn't want to contact him or run any of your ideas past him? hmmmmm


Are you implying that something nefarious was taking place?  Kyle contacted us in order for the Freebirds to disseminate the information in a controlled manner.  HIS words.  That's what we were doing. 

oh...a "controlled manner" gotcha!


HIS WORDS.   Are you stuck on something?


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #788 12/31/08 -
Post by: Angiex911dsptchr on December 31, 2008, 04:12:23 PM
I would like to know how Lisa purports to know what Kyle posted or did not post in Freebirds. 3 actual members (Kermit, wingnut, and jen) relay what/when he actually posted. Kyle doesn't refute what they say to anyone but Lisa or Hotshot. I can understand you believing any and everything Kyle tells you personally -- but to totally dismiss what people WHO WERE THERE (Freebirds) say is simply putting your head in the sand.

Ummm.. make it 4 now...  ::MonkeyCool::

I been reading several pages.. and YES.. I read and seen it all. So.. I can say in all honesty.. I cak up 100% what Kermit, Jen and Wingnut are posting. I love yah all here at SM and also the folks at freebirds. I may as well resign from there now that I suppose I outed myself as well. I didnt do a whole hell of alot there. I really didnt have time due to work. I read all what Kyle has posted and PLEASE people.. listen to Kermit..Jen and Wingnut.

Now.. I guess I differed this thread.. lol  Anyhow.. I really need to go and get a shower and get the hell out of the house~!

Have a Happy New Year everyone !!

Jen and Wing.. I apologize.. but reading page after page after page.. I wanted others to know you guys are not full of shit !!
 ::MonkeyCool::

Awwww,  so good to see you, Angie.

 Hi sweety ~!  Great to see you to and others! I don't get to read much here lately. :(

Jen.. luv yah and you  guys are doing a great job and just wanted to sticj up for you all.

Wreck.. I have not heard from Robots lately... I got an email a few months ago.. I responded and have not heard from him since. :(

Klass.. God love yah for still being here !!!  You certainly have a heart of gold the patience of a saint!  :)


Ok.. for real gotta get going. Hope to chat with you guys again soon. Have a few days off this week !  Hugs and miss yah all !  ::MonkeyWink::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #788 12/31/08 -
Post by: texasmom on December 31, 2008, 04:13:13 PM
I would like to know how Lisa purports to know what Kyle posted or did not post in Freebirds. 3 actual members (Kermit, wingnut, and jen) relay what/when he actually posted. Kyle doesn't refute what they say to anyone but Lisa or Hotshot. I can understand you believing any and everything Kyle tells you personally -- but to totally dismiss what people WHO WERE THERE (Freebirds) say is simply putting your head in the sand.

Ummm.. make it 4 now...  ::MonkeyCool::

I been reading several pages.. and YES.. I read and seen it all. So.. I can say in all honesty.. I cak up 100% what Kermit, Jen and Wingnut are posting. I love yah all here at SM and also the folks at freebirds. I may as well resign from there now that I suppose I outed myself as well. I didnt do a whole hell of alot there. I really didnt have time due to work. I read all what Kyle has posted and PLEASE people.. listen to Kermit..Jen and Wingnut.

Now.. I guess I differed this thread.. lol  Anyhow.. I really need to go and get a shower and get the hell out of the house~!

Have a Happy New Year everyone !!

Jen and Wing.. I apologize.. but reading page after page after page.. I wanted others to know you guys are not full of shit !!
 ::MonkeyCool::

Thanks Angie, and good to see you!!!!  ::MonkeyCool::

I appreciate your doing this, but I had no doubts about wingnut and jen's sincerity.

Happy New Year!!!!

OMG, I can't believe I left Kermit out!  I believe them all.   ::MonkeyCool::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #788 12/31/08 -
Post by: Angiex911dsptchr on December 31, 2008, 04:13:19 PM
I would like to know how Lisa purports to know what Kyle posted or did not post in Freebirds. 3 actual members (Kermit, wingnut, and jen) relay what/when he actually posted. Kyle doesn't refute what they say to anyone but Lisa or Hotshot. I can understand you believing any and everything Kyle tells you personally -- but to totally dismiss what people WHO WERE THERE (Freebirds) say is simply putting your head in the sand.

Ummm.. make it 4 now...  ::MonkeyCool::

I been reading several pages.. and YES.. I read and seen it all. So.. I can say in all honesty.. I cak up 100% what Kermit, Jen and Wingnut are posting. I love yah all here at SM and also the folks at freebirds. I may as well resign from there now that I suppose I outed myself as well. I didnt do a whole hell of alot there. I really didnt have time due to work. I read all what Kyle has posted and PLEASE people.. listen to Kermit..Jen and Wingnut.

Now.. I guess I differed this thread.. lol  Anyhow.. I really need to go and get a shower and get the hell out of the house~!

Have a Happy New Year everyone !!

Jen and Wing.. I apologize.. but reading page after page after page.. I wanted others to know you guys are not full of shit !!
 ::MonkeyCool::


Hey Ang!  You did more than you know.  There were many times that you held me up.  I hope you have a FAB New Year.  You deserve it more than most.

Love ya Sistah!

Back at yah Wing and Happy New Year Anna !!!   ::MonkeyDance::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #788 12/31/08 -
Post by: Blonde on December 31, 2008, 04:14:08 PM
Subject: Caps

I have asked repeatedly for many months for those who doubt Caps to tell me the reasons why.  Show me some proof he's not who he claims to be or from where he claims to be from.  I've never received any proof that he is not who he claims to be, or that he is only here as a diversion.  The only things that were posted about these doubts in many instances I found to be as cryptic as some of Caps posts.  From my own communications with him fairly recently, I started to have my own doubts about some things.  Basically how he knew certain things, and how that information changed from what he'd already told me.  

I only want the truth. I want to know what happened to Natalee, where she is, and for her to be brought home.  Justice for her and her family would be the utmost, but I doubt that will ever happen.

In the past I have stood up for Caps when the basis of doubts was a post he made on the seven sins, the post was obviously cut and pasted from somewhere else.  The claim was that because of that post Caps was a master of the English language and was deceiving us all with his usual somewhat broken English way of speaking.  That was not proof in my opinion.  This was not the only time I stood by him, there were others.  Each time I was attacked for defending him; but was never provided any information that proved that Caps was/is deceiving us.  If there is information that proves that Caps is not from Aruba, is not who he claims to be; and that he was involved in a conspiracy...I would like to know about it.  Please!

From Caps own admissions I know he met with John Silvetti, from my understanding this is what he believed Dave Holloway wanted him to do.  From my understanding Caps has never communicated with Dave Holloway other than through email, although he provided other means for Dave to contact him.  Caps has also told me that he never met or had dealings with anyone else on the Persistence.  From my perspective of my discussions with Caps and what I have read here, I believe there is a possibility that he and his information was used to further the agenda of others.

I have read Caps original logic report that was sent to some in January from what I can tell.  I have only received and read it in the past few months.  From my understanding he researched the logic of Natalee being placed in all of the ponds that have been mentioned, the most logical conclusion to the research was that she was placed in the pond at Monserat.

I've checked the sitemeter before too, and know that there were times that he was here and Aruba did show up.  

I have a lot of questions, and I also have an open mind.  I want any and all information that is known to help me decide if I was duped/conned or whatever.  What I have said in the past was my belief from the information I had.  So far I don't have any information that convinces me otherwise.

I will repeat this because this is why I am here.

I only want the truth. I want to know what happened to Natalee, where she is, and for her to be brought home.  Justice for her and her family would be the utmost, but I doubt that will ever happen.
 
Unless you know his IP ( in Aruba this rotates)  it could just have been a guest from Aruba or a a lurker.
 unless when you click the  Recent Visitors by Referrals
Detail   Referring URL
   http://scaredmonkeys.net/index.php?topic=4306.1200link
and it took you right to his post.Then for sure it was him.



Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #788 12/31/08 -
Post by: Anna on December 31, 2008, 04:14:52 PM


So why can't he change his mind about John Silvetti? Why is that an untruth and conspiracy because in hindsight after emotions have died down and he had time to reflect upon what happened and he decides he over reacted in regards to his concerns...that you call FACTS...why is that "about face" so unbelievable...because it ruined your conspiracy?

Look lady - I don't know who you are, and I don't really care.  But what you're calling MY conspiracy is not mine at all.

They are KYLE's beliefs, KYLE's words, and KYLE's concerns - and those are all separate from the FACTS Kyle shared with us as well.

And what's rather comical about this post of yours is - the fact that Kyle KNOWS Silvetti was self serving when that trap was found, and the fact that Kyle BELIEVED that witness to be full of crap, but then comes back and tells us differently after working for Silvetti, only re-enforced the questions in my mind about something hinky going on between John and this witness.

Not the other way around like you posted.



so you got a "hinky feeling" That is not PROOF of the conspiracy you are putting out here.

And really what you should have said is "YOU believe Kyle believed". Because you just said he stated he doesn't believes that now.

It's all pure speculation on your part.

You're not even making sense any more.  I would suggest you go back and carefully re-read everything that has been posted by Kermit, wingnut and myself about what Kyle has said.

That really might be helpful to you.

Including my letter that clearly stated - NONE of Kyle's words that have been posted here were taken out of context.

Best of luck to you - I'm not playing your games any more.


So how were you to know Kyle had had this change of heart in the interim from the time he made the posts until he resurfaced?  Should we all check back with each other to see if anybody has changed their mind about something?  Aren't people usually responsible for getting that information on a board themselves?



Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #788 12/31/08 -
Post by: truthseeker2 on December 31, 2008, 04:15:18 PM
Thanx Truthseeker2.Forgot to respond to the last response. Will stand with the Frog until the finality then take my thoughts from there.If i'm wrong i will Eat crow then bury my head in the sand rightfully so... ::MonkeyDance::.Until then.Ribbit...

LOL.  I just hate that it appears sides are to be taken, sotospeak.  But I guess it is what it is.   ::MonkeyCool::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #788 12/31/08 -
Post by: SunnyinTX on December 31, 2008, 04:15:28 PM
Subject: Caps

I have asked repeatedly for many months for those who doubt Caps to tell me the reasons why.  Show me some proof he's not who he claims to be or from where he claims to be from.  I've never received any proof that he is not who he claims to be, or that he is only here as a diversion.  The only things that were posted about these doubts in many instances I found to be as cryptic as some of Caps posts.  From my own communications with him fairly recently, I started to have my own doubts about some things.  Basically how he knew certain things, and how that information changed from what he'd already told me.  

I only want the truth. I want to know what happened to Natalee, where she is, and for her to be brought home.  Justice for her and her family would be the utmost, but I doubt that will ever happen.

In the past I have stood up for Caps when the basis of doubts was a post he made on the seven sins, the post was obviously cut and pasted from somewhere else.  The claim was that because of that post Caps was a master of the English language and was deceiving us all with his usual somewhat broken English way of speaking.  That was not proof in my opinion.  This was not the only time I stood by him, there were others.  Each time I was attacked for defending him; but was never provided any information that proved that Caps was/is deceiving us.  If there is information that proves that Caps is not from Aruba, is not who he claims to be; and that he was involved in a conspiracy...I would like to know about it.  Please!

From Caps own admissions I know he met with John Silvetti, from my understanding this is what he believed Dave Holloway wanted him to do.  From my understanding Caps has never communicated with Dave Holloway other than through email, although he provided other means for Dave to contact him.  Caps has also told me that he never met or had dealings with anyone else on the Persistence.  From my perspective of my discussions with Caps and what I have read here, I believe there is a possibility that he and his information was used to further the agenda of others.

I have read Caps original logic report that was sent to some in January from what I can tell.  I have only received and read it in the past few months.  From my understanding he researched the logic of Natalee being placed in all of the ponds that have been mentioned, the most logical conclusion to the research was that she was placed in the pond at Monserat.

I've checked the sitemeter before too, and know that there were times that he was here and Aruba did show up.  

I have a lot of questions, and I also have an open mind.  I want any and all information that is known to help me decide if I was duped/conned or whatever.  What I have said in the past was my belief from the information I had.  So far I don't have any information that convinces me otherwise.

I will repeat this because this is why I am here.

I only want the truth. I want to know what happened to Natalee, where she is, and for her to be brought home.  Justice for her and her family would be the utmost, but I doubt that will ever happen.

Are you able to share that  logic report with us. I have no feelings towards Caps one way or another.....like the Shango stuff (Lala's do not blast me please) code tlaking posts drive me crazy and I do not even bother to read them ::MonkeyNoNo::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #788 12/31/08 -
Post by: ldstlou on December 31, 2008, 04:15:33 PM


So why can't he change his mind about John Silvetti? Why is that an untruth and conspiracy because in hindsight after emotions have died down and he had time to reflect upon what happened and he decides he over reacted in regards to his concerns...that you call FACTS...why is that "about face" so unbelievable...because it ruined your conspiracy?

Look lady - I don't know who you are, and I don't really care.  But what you're calling MY conspiracy is not mine at all.

They are KYLE's beliefs, KYLE's words, and KYLE's concerns - and those are all separate from the FACTS Kyle shared with us as well.

And what's rather comical about this post of yours is - the fact that Kyle KNOWS Silvetti was self serving when that trap was found, and the fact that Kyle BELIEVED that witness to be full of crap, but then comes back and tells us differently after working for Silvetti, only re-enforced the questions in my mind about something hinky going on between John and this witness.

Not the other way around like you posted.



so you got a "hinky feeling" That is not PROOF of the conspiracy you are putting out here.

And really what you should have said is "YOU believe Kyle believed". Because you just said he stated he doesn't believes that now.

It's all pure speculation on your part.

You're not even making sense any more.  I would suggest you go back and carefully re-read everything that has been posted by Kermit, wingnut and myself about what Kyle has said.

That really might be helpful to you.

Including my letter that clearly stated - NONE of Kyle's words that have been posted here were taken out of context.

Best of luck to you - I'm not playing your games any more.

Read your letter clearly...and because you said so...I am supposed to believe right? ok then..NOT!

So keep disseminated half truths...and John stole evidence from the cage and placed it in the pond right? And Tim Miller and Dave and Beth and Jug were all duped, right? And The FBI were kept out of the loop right? And somehow Dateline missed it all right? Damn that crew of the Persistence were good!!! Oh...slipped it past the "thought print" Dr. too...he wasn't reading the members of the Crew too well either was he?
And Hotshot lead the conspiracy...and Lalas and I were all in on it.

It is so rediculous...it would be laughable if people weren't buying it.

But you still can't tell me if Beth, JQK and the FBI bought the conspiracy theory right?

You all have a Happy New Year!!
I am out of here.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #788 12/31/08 -
Post by: Magnolia on December 31, 2008, 04:17:19 PM
LADIES & GENTLEMEN.....

Here in one hand we have Freebirds, Kermit, Jen, Wingnut, Angie and Rob.
all attesting to Kyle's post and ROV images that were posted at
the Freebirds site, but not turned over to authorities.  By his own
admission, Kyle tried to sell those images for his own profit.  All five
of these people say this is the truth.

In the other hand we have Kyle........

Who do you believe?


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #788 12/31/08 -
Post by: truthseeker2 on December 31, 2008, 04:17:54 PM
(http://i272.photobucket.com/albums/jj176/bastibro/career-builder-monkey-pointer.jpg)

 ::MonkeyLaugh::  ::MonkeyLaugh::

Is that you in the lower right?


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #788 12/31/08 -
Post by: Ree on December 31, 2008, 04:18:08 PM


So why can't he change his mind about John Silvetti? Why is that an untruth and conspiracy because in hindsight after emotions have died down and he had time to reflect upon what happened and he decides he over reacted in regards to his concerns...that you call FACTS...why is that "about face" so unbelievable...because it ruined your conspiracy?

Look lady - I don't know who you are, and I don't really care.  But what you're calling MY conspiracy is not mine at all.

They are KYLE's beliefs, KYLE's words, and KYLE's concerns - and those are all separate from the FACTS Kyle shared with us as well.

And what's rather comical about this post of yours is - the fact that Kyle KNOWS Silvetti was self serving when that trap was found, and the fact that Kyle BELIEVED that witness to be full of crap, but then comes back and tells us differently after working for Silvetti, only re-enforced the questions in my mind about something hinky going on between John and this witness.

Not the other way around like you posted.



so you got a "hinky feeling" That is not PROOF of the conspiracy you are putting out here.

And really what you should have said is "YOU believe Kyle believed". Because you just said he stated he doesn't believes that now.

It's all pure speculation on your part.

You're not even making sense any more.  I would suggest you go back and carefully re-read everything that has been posted by Kermit, wingnut and myself about what Kyle has said.

That really might be helpful to you.

Including my letter that clearly stated - NONE of Kyle's words that have been posted here were taken out of context.

Best of luck to you - I'm not playing your games any more.

Read your letter clearly...and because you said so...I am supposed to believe right? ok then..NOT!

So keep disseminated half truths...and John stole evidence from the cage and placed it in the pond right? And Tim Miller and Dave and Beth and Jug were all duped, right? And The FBI were kept out of the loop right? And somehow Dateline missed it all right? Damn that crew of the Persistence were good!!! Oh...slipped it past the "thought print" Dr. too...he wasn't reading the members of the Crew too well either was he?
And Hotshot lead the conspiracy...and Lalas and I were all in on it.

It is so rediculous...it would be laughable if people weren't buying it.

But you still can't tell me if Beth, JQK and the FBI bought the conspiracy theory right?

You all have a Happy New Year!!
I am out of here.

Pardon my bad...

 ::MonkeyDance:: ::cartwheel:: ::MonkeyDance:: ::cartwheel:: ::MonkeyDance:: ::cartwheel::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #788 12/31/08 -
Post by: klaasend on December 31, 2008, 04:18:15 PM
Subject: Caps

I have asked repeatedly for many months for those who doubt Caps to tell me the reasons why.  Show me some proof he's not who he claims to be or from where he claims to be from.  I've never received any proof that he is not who he claims to be, or that he is only here as a diversion.  The only things that were posted about these doubts in many instances I found to be as cryptic as some of Caps posts.  From my own communications with him fairly recently, I started to have my own doubts about some things.  Basically how he knew certain things, and how that information changed from what he'd already told me.  

I only want the truth. I want to know what happened to Natalee, where she is, and for her to be brought home.  Justice for her and her family would be the utmost, but I doubt that will ever happen.

In the past I have stood up for Caps when the basis of doubts was a post he made on the seven sins, the post was obviously cut and pasted from somewhere else.  The claim was that because of that post Caps was a master of the English language and was deceiving us all with his usual somewhat broken English way of speaking.  That was not proof in my opinion.  This was not the only time I stood by him, there were others.  Each time I was attacked for defending him; but was never provided any information that proved that Caps was/is deceiving us.  If there is information that proves that Caps is not from Aruba, is not who he claims to be; and that he was involved in a conspiracy...I would like to know about it.  Please!

From Caps own admissions I know he met with John Silvetti, from my understanding this is what he believed Dave Holloway wanted him to do.  From my understanding Caps has never communicated with Dave Holloway other than through email, although he provided other means for Dave to contact him.  Caps has also told me that he never met or had dealings with anyone else on the Persistence.  From my perspective of my discussions with Caps and what I have read here, I believe there is a possibility that he and his information was used to further the agenda of others.

I have read Caps original logic report that was sent to some in January from what I can tell.  I have only received and read it in the past few months.  From my understanding he researched the logic of Natalee being placed in all of the ponds that have been mentioned, the most logical conclusion to the research was that she was placed in the pond at Monserat.

I've checked the sitemeter before too, and know that there were times that he was here and Aruba did show up.  

I have a lot of questions, and I also have an open mind.  I want any and all information that is known to help me decide if I was duped/conned or whatever.  What I have said in the past was my belief from the information I had.  So far I don't have any information that convinces me otherwise.

I will repeat this because this is why I am here.

I only want the truth. I want to know what happened to Natalee, where she is, and for her to be brought home.  Justice for her and her family would be the utmost, but I doubt that will ever happen.
 
Unless you know his IP ( in Aruba this rotates)  it could just have been a guest from Aruba or a a lurker.
 unless when you click the  Recent Visitors by Referrals
Detail   Referring URL
   http://scaredmonkeys.net/index.php?topic=4306.1200link
and it took you right to his post.Then for sure it was him.



Or if you are Admin and can see all the IP's he has used when posting.

Capslock is/was in and posting from Aruba, I do not doubt that.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #788 12/31/08 -
Post by: Anna on December 31, 2008, 04:20:32 PM
What is this "conspiracy" that is spoken of?  I don't think it took a conspiracy for ALE to abscond with the evidence from the fish trap.

They took every shred of it AFAIK giving them sole control over what was submitted and what was not.  That seems to be a fact and not a theory.

Therein lies the problem.  We will never know what happened to whatever was taken from the trap.  Was it submitted, destroyed, did not even pertain to Natalee?

It's the not knowing and not having any way to find out that causes the concern.

JMO



Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #788 12/31/08 -
Post by: truthseeker2 on December 31, 2008, 04:21:11 PM
Heyyyy.I thought i was the one stirring the pot.... ::MonkeyDance:: ::MonkeyDance::

 ::MonkeyLaugh::  Ya gotta hold a little tighter to that spoon if you want to be the pot stirrer!


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #788 12/31/08 -
Post by: truthseeker2 on December 31, 2008, 04:23:05 PM
Please fill me in on the latest with URINE...he is in Laos??

Yes, the louse is in Laos.  Hanging out at some bars that appear to attack tourists.  (Some things never change)

I really can't believe someone hasn't beat the crap  out of him yet.....and disappear his body

Me either, Sunny.  He just seems to drift from place to place drinking, smoking his weed and losing his money.  I would love to know who is financing his journeys.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #788 12/31/08 -
Post by: jen3560 on December 31, 2008, 04:23:22 PM


So how were you to know Kyle had had this change of heart in the interim from the time he made the posts until he resurfaced?  Should we all check back with each other to see if anybody has changed their mind about something?  Aren't people usually responsible for getting that information on a board themselves?



No kidding! ::MonkeyCool::

We were pretty busy during that time - finding out Kyle had lied to us, and never sent the info to Beth, had never sent it to the FBI, finding out all sorts of interesting things about Silvetti's other companies (including his DUTCH company), nifty things about Shaefer and the class action suit against his company, restructuring of another one, selling off stocks of another one, resigning, .............well - we kind of had our hands full - too busy for sure to try mind reading a member who was in the North Sea.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #788 12/31/08 -
Post by: Anna on December 31, 2008, 04:25:09 PM
If and when I change my mind about things I have posted here, I will come back and say so.  That's what people do.  If they don't do this, one normally would assume they stand by what they said.



Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #788 12/31/08 -
Post by: Keepthefaith on December 31, 2008, 04:25:20 PM
Thanx Truthseeker2.Forgot to respond to the last response. Will stand with the Frog until the finality then take my thoughts from there.If i'm wrong i will Eat crow then bury my head in the sand rightfully so... ::MonkeyDance::.Until then.Ribbit...

LOL.  I just hate that it appears sides are to be taken, sotospeak.  But I guess it is what it is.   ::MonkeyCool::

I think it is ok to agree to disagree.I still think that the Power families on the island know what happened per se!It could be real simple.What's not simple for me is how many people in those families are unwilling to facilitate in some way to get to the truth,as well as bringing Natalee Home.There is so many back channel's that could be used.It's Aruba.Who's gonna prosecute anyone 31/2 to 4 yrs later??I hope someone does but will never hold my breath


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #788 12/31/08 -
Post by: Ree on December 31, 2008, 04:28:34 PM
Thanx Truthseeker2.Forgot to respond to the last response. Will stand with the Frog until the finality then take my thoughts from there.If i'm wrong i will Eat crow then bury my head in the sand rightfully so... ::MonkeyDance::.Until then.Ribbit...

LOL.  I just hate that it appears sides are to be taken, sotospeak.  But I guess it is what it is.   ::MonkeyCool::

I think it is ok to agree to disagree.I still think that the Power families on the island know what happened per se!It could be real simple.What's not simple for me is how many people in those families are unwilling to facilitate in some way to get to the truth,as well as bringing Natalee Home.There is so many back channel's that could be used.It's Aruba.Who's gonna prosecute anyone 31/2 to 4 yrs later??I hope someone does but will never hold my breath

I agree.  Agreeing to disagree is not the problem.  It's those who want to decide what everybody else should be allowed to talk about.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #788 12/31/08 -
Post by: klaasend on December 31, 2008, 04:29:03 PM

Read your letter clearly...and because you said so...I am supposed to believe right? ok then..NOT!

So keep disseminated half truths...and John stole evidence from the cage and placed it in the pond right? And Tim Miller and Dave and Beth and Jug were all duped, right? And The FBI were kept out of the loop right? And somehow Dateline missed it all right? Damn that crew of the Persistence were good!!! Oh...slipped it past the "thought print" Dr. too...he wasn't reading the members of the Crew too well either was he?
And Hotshot lead the conspiracy...and Lalas and I were all in on it.

It is so rediculous...it would be laughable if people weren't buying it.

But you still can't tell me if Beth, JQK and the FBI bought the conspiracy theory right?

You all have a Happy New Year!!
I am out of here.

Are you listening to yourself?  Everything you posted above is an exaggeration or misinterpretation of what Kermit was saying.  Talk about twisting things?  If this is how you describe the subject to Jug how can we trust his answers? 

YES or NO

According to Kyle Aruban divers were the only ones there to take evidence from the trap.  If that is the case do we believe the Aruban divers about what the evidence was?  Does the family know for sure what was removed from the trap?  Do we or the family know for sure what the Aruban divers gave to the FBI to test?  Could the Aruban divers have given the FBI something totally unrelated to what was found in the trap?


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #788 12/31/08 -
Post by: bastibro on December 31, 2008, 04:29:18 PM
Happy newyear to all  . .

(http://i272.photobucket.com/albums/jj176/bastibro/newyear.jpg)

Let`s all keep praying for Justice4Natalee,


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #788 12/31/08 -
Post by: Ree on December 31, 2008, 04:29:46 PM
So CAPS told us about parts 2,3,4, etc, not Jossy.  Anybody have a line to Jossy to ask if there's going to be more?  Perhaps even ask about his son's role in the cage dive?


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #788 12/31/08 -
Post by: Anna on December 31, 2008, 04:30:15 PM
Well, regardless of location, nothing came of all the Caps posts either.

The pond dried up per Ann Angela of Office of Prosecution.  Was never drained and there were no agents from Holland there for the Natalee investigation.

And the theories changed constantly.  Remember the Mason's cemetery?  Under Lorenzo's driveway?  Even before all the pond talk.

And with that am taking a headache break. 


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #788 12/31/08 -
Post by: Keepthefaith on December 31, 2008, 04:33:23 PM
I'm still waiting for your response MUM?What is my motivation for stirring the pot?




Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #788 12/31/08 -
Post by: truthseeker2 on December 31, 2008, 04:35:06 PM
Thanx Truthseeker2.Forgot to respond to the last response. Will stand with the Frog until the finality then take my thoughts from there.If i'm wrong i will Eat crow then bury my head in the sand rightfully so... ::MonkeyDance::.Until then.Ribbit...

LOL.  I just hate that it appears sides are to be taken, sotospeak.  But I guess it is what it is.   ::MonkeyCool::

I think it is ok to agree to disagree.I still think that the Power families on the island know what happened per se!It could be real simple.What's not simple for me is how many people in those families are unwilling to facilitate in some way to get to the truth,as well as bringing Natalee Home.There is so many back channel's that could be used.It's Aruba.Who's gonna prosecute anyone 31/2 to 4 yrs later??I hope someone does but will never hold my breath

Yeah, I don't think we can hold our breath for that either.  I agree that people on Aruba know.  But, what do they know?  I will say/ask again, albeit rhetorical, What truth is so horrific that those in charge on Aruba are willing to let the entire island suffer for it instead of letting the truth come out?  There must be people in Aruba who made that decision and decided the truth was worse than a justifiable end to the torment they caused a family.  They decided the entire island will pay for this.  If I was living in Aruba I would be really pizzed off!


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #788 12/31/08 -
Post by: texasmom on December 31, 2008, 04:39:59 PM
Subject: Caps

snip:
Are you able to share that  logic report with us. I have no feelings towards Caps one way or another.....like the Shango stuff (Lala's do not blast me please) code tlaking posts drive me crazy and I do not even bother to read them ::MonkeyNoNo::

I will email Caps and ask if it is o.k. to share it, without his o.k. I can't.  I'm sorry, maybe I shouldn't have brought it up.  I only did because I think that the references to the other ponds may come from his research of the possibilites of all of them.  I believe he researched those possibilities because of searches that were done and/or the mentioning of certain places by Simian and/or Shango.  If I hear back from Caps, I will either post it; or let you know that he does not want it posted.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #788 12/31/08 -
Post by: jen3560 on December 31, 2008, 04:42:06 PM
Thanx Truthseeker2.Forgot to respond to the last response. Will stand with the Frog until the finality then take my thoughts from there.If i'm wrong i will Eat crow then bury my head in the sand rightfully so... ::MonkeyDance::.Until then.Ribbit...

LOL.  I just hate that it appears sides are to be taken, sotospeak.  But I guess it is what it is.   ::MonkeyCool::

I think it is ok to agree to disagree.I still think that the Power families on the island know what happened per se!It could be real simple.What's not simple for me is how many people in those families are unwilling to facilitate in some way to get to the truth,as well as bringing Natalee Home.There is so many back channel's that could be used.It's Aruba.Who's gonna prosecute anyone 31/2 to 4 yrs later??I hope someone does but will never hold my breath

Yeah, I don't think we can hold our breath for that either.  I agree that people on Aruba know.  But, what do they know?  I will say/ask again, albeit rhetorical, What truth is so horrific that those in charge on Aruba are willing to let the entire island suffer for it instead of letting the truth come out?  There must be people in Aruba who made that decision and decided the truth was worse than a justifiable end to the torment they caused a family.  They decided the entire island will pay for this.  If I was living in Aruba I would be really pizzed off!

Well, Kyle told us about another "witness" who approached them.  With his...........I think brother?  This "witness" said he had a vision.  Gave them coordinates out to sea.  This brother of the witness was an Aruban detective.

The coordinates were pretty much right on the fish trap.

Kyle's supposition (and I agree) was that there was no vision.  Either this person or his ALE brother already KNEW where Natalee's remains were, and were using the idea of a "vision" as their "out" in telling about it.

So - just one more reason why Persistence crew need to be talked to regarding what went on while they were in Aruba.

They know this detective's name.  That could open up a LOT regarding the initial cover up from 2005.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #788 12/31/08 -
Post by: texasmom on December 31, 2008, 04:43:42 PM
Subject: Caps
snip
Unless you know his IP ( in Aruba this rotates)  it could just have been a guest from Aruba or a a lurker.
 unless when you click the  Recent Visitors by Referrals
Detail   Referring URL
   http://scaredmonkeys.net/index.php?topic=4306.1200link
and it took you right to his post.Then for sure it was him.



Or if you are Admin and can see all the IP's he has used when posting.

Capslock is/was in and posting from Aruba, I do not doubt that.

Thanks Klaas, I have always believed he was.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #788 12/31/08 -
Post by: jen3560 on December 31, 2008, 04:43:56 PM
Subject: Caps

snip:
Are you able to share that  logic report with us. I have no feelings towards Caps one way or another.....like the Shango stuff (Lala's do not blast me please) code tlaking posts drive me crazy and I do not even bother to read them ::MonkeyNoNo::

I will email Caps and ask if it is o.k. to share it, without his o.k. I can't.  I'm sorry, maybe I shouldn't have brought it up.  I only did because I think that the references to the other ponds may come from his research of the possibilites of all of them.  I believe he researched those possibilities because of searches that were done and/or the mentioning of certain places by Simian and/or Shango.  If I hear back from Caps, I will either post it; or let you know that he does not want it posted.

Texas mom,

can you share the date this report was created?  And whether it was before or after this pond witness entered the picture?


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #788 12/31/08 -
Post by: GrannyToad on December 31, 2008, 04:53:14 PM
Betcha Joran's got CRABS


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #788 12/31/08 -
Post by: Blonde on December 31, 2008, 04:54:25 PM
LADIES & GENTLEMEN.....

Here in one hand we have Freebirds, Kermit, Jen, Wingnut, Angie and Rob.
all attesting to Kyle's post and ROV images that were posted at
the Freebirds site, but not turned over to authorities.  By his own
admission, Kyle tried to sell those images for his own profit.  All five
of these people say this is the truth.

In the other hand we have Kyle........

Who do you believe?
I have been posting with Kermit for 3 .5 years.
 WE TALK I have never know her to lie about anything. If I ask a question and she doesn't know the answer she tells me that.
She has always been good in connecting the dots.
I did call her and say i was sorry because of the hit & runs their for a while.
She told me she had no choice. I believe her.
She Does NOT lie.
Wingnut,I think I met you at faith & Friends
 Angie, I don't know you very well
 Rob I have been posting with now for 2.5 years and we have talked also
I STAND BY THEM..



Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #788 12/31/08 -
Post by: texasmom on December 31, 2008, 04:57:50 PM
Texas mom,

can you share the date this report was created?  And whether it was before or after this pond witness entered the picture?


I have no way of knowing exactly when it was created.  I haven't sent my email yet, so I will add that question and hope that Caps responds to my email.  I haven't looked at the report again today, but the email that was posted last night (but removed) reminded me a lot of what I'd read.  IIRC the date of that email was January 30th.  I believe others received the logic report months before I read it, maybe they can verify when they received it.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #788 12/31/08 -
Post by: klaasend on December 31, 2008, 05:01:01 PM
Betcha Joran's got CRABS

LOL  ::MonkeyHaHa::  Hi GrannyToad...quite an entrance!


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #788 12/31/08 -
Post by: wingnut on December 31, 2008, 05:01:03 PM
LADIES & GENTLEMEN.....

Here in one hand we have Freebirds, Kermit, Jen, Wingnut, Angie and Rob.
all attesting to Kyle's post and ROV images that were posted at
the Freebirds site, but not turned over to authorities.  By his own
admission, Kyle tried to sell those images for his own profit.  All five
of these people say this is the truth.

In the other hand we have Kyle........

Who do you believe?
I have been posting with Kermit for 3 .5 years.
 WE TALK I have never know her to lie about anything. If I ask a question and she doesn't know the answer she tells me that.
She has always been good in connecting the dots.
I did call her and say i was sorry because of the hit & runs their for a while.
She told me she had no choice. I believe her.
She Does NOT lie.
Wingnut,I think I met you at faith & Friends
 Angie, I don't know you very well
 Rob I have been posting with now for 2.5 years and we have talked also
I STAND BY THEM..




Hi Blonde.  Yes, I was at Faith's site for awhile.



Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #788 12/31/08 -
Post by: jen3560 on December 31, 2008, 05:01:35 PM
Texas mom,

can you share the date this report was created?  And whether it was before or after this pond witness entered the picture?


I have no way of knowing exactly when it was created.  I haven't sent my email yet, so I will add that question and hope that Caps responds to my email.  I haven't looked at the report again today, but the email that was posted last night (but removed) reminded me a lot of what I'd read.  IIRC the date of that email was January 30th.  I believe others received the logic report months before I read it, maybe they can verify when they received it.

Thanks !!


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #788 12/31/08 -
Post by: Blonde on December 31, 2008, 05:01:43 PM
HAPPY NEW YEAR, GOING TO A PARTY AT MY DAUGHTERS HOUSE IT'S SNOWING LIKE CRAZY HERE .
(http://i18.photobucket.com/albums/b104/Blondeonahd/Fun%20stuff/Christmas/ShowLetter.gif)


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #788 12/31/08 -
Post by: jen3560 on December 31, 2008, 05:03:07 PM
Happy New Year Monkeys!!!!  ::MonkeyDance::

Blonde - be careful out there!


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #788 12/31/08 -
Post by: SunnyinTX on December 31, 2008, 05:08:38 PM
Subject: Caps

snip:
Are you able to share that  logic report with us. I have no feelings towards Caps one way or another.....like the Shango stuff (Lala's do not blast me please) code tlaking posts drive me crazy and I do not even bother to read them ::MonkeyNoNo::

I will email Caps and ask if it is o.k. to share it, without his o.k. I can't.  I'm sorry, maybe I shouldn't have brought it up.  I only did because I think that the references to the other ponds may come from his research of the possibilites of all of them.  I believe he researched those possibilities because of searches that were done and/or the mentioning of certain places by Simian and/or Shango.  If I hear back from Caps, I will either post it; or let you know that he does not want it posted.

OK thanks!!  Hopefully he will allow you to share it....it seemed to bring some clarity to you and hope we can all share in that


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #788 12/31/08 -
Post by: Hotshot on December 31, 2008, 05:11:13 PM
Quote
Mum,

If you look at the dates of those posts by Caps, versus the date he sent his email to Dave Holloway of "I know where she is" and including the post by Caps about all Dave needs to do is get some pumps to bring her home......

Well - you'll see that Caps was still jumping from pond to pond to pond at the time he was stating those things.

Then miraculously comes this "witness" that Caps kept saying over and over was needed.

Then all of a sudden it's the Monserrat pond - not any of the other two ponds Caps was discussing (those other ponds were still his focus when he emailed Dave).

Combine that with Hotshot claiming to be the one who put Caps and this "witness" in touch with John Silvetti.

Take that one step further, and look at Silvetti's utter lack of attention to that cage - to the point where he cussed at Kyle for trying to pursue the matter.

Then look at Hot Shot's posts about removing items from the cage.

Then look at Caps posts regarding a shoe and human remains in the pond......

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Scary how this is coming together.  (Are  you stating they moved  body parts?  I think you need to rethink this all.I did get CAPS to go to Silvetti or Tim  for help with the pond.  that is just what he did.  Silvetti went back to Aruba to do more searching with the pond.  he also went to get signatures to do more with the pond, and  that  didnt pan out due to MOS).   
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Rob says
Yanno Kath, it's about time someone told you so you don't spend the rest of your life in HERO STATUS - but you're(edit). I hope you are not back here in the New Year just like Caps and that cowardly Kyle.  (who are you calling me HERO STATUS)? Your the one who bragged how you'd be driving a Lambhorgini by being the hero.  Rob, you not what you think you are, trust me on this!
I would have banned your ass so long ago you wouldn't even remember this board.  (If you only knew who really doesnt appreciate your actions, and posts, you'd be amazed.)

And btw - one more thing - your brand of helping has helped no one. That's the kind of "help" we can all do without.  (You weren't much help either Rob)   
---------------------------------------------------------------------
Destiny and ******* started up their own private forum.  (Assumption WRONG)!
--------------------------------------------------------------------
The following  wasnt his job, it was silvettis!
Maybe not as far as that's concerned, but certainly Kyle/responsible party did not turn over evidence to the family/FBI in a timely manner so there was a coverup exposed.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
TruthSeeker, I read everyone of your posts....
Sunny, I agree  with people misreading too. It is getting ugly.  unessasary.
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
Jen says
You made a post in the last thread about Caps posting, and a lack of Aruban people on the meter.  (thats because he now has a program that doesnt show where he is from anymore)
------------------------------------------------------------------------









Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #788 12/31/08 -
Post by: sharon on December 31, 2008, 05:13:00 PM
I would like to know how Lisa purports to know what Kyle posted or did not post in Freebirds. 3 actual members (Kermit, wingnut, and jen) relay what/when he actually posted. Kyle doesn't refute what they say to anyone but Lisa or Hotshot. I can understand you believing any and everything Kyle tells you personally -- but to totally dismiss what people WHO WERE THERE (Freebirds) say is simply putting your head in the sand.

Ummm.. make it 4 now...  ::MonkeyCool::

I been reading several pages.. and YES.. I read and seen it all. So.. I can say in all honesty.. I cak up 100% what Kermit, Jen and Wingnut are posting. I love yah all here at SM and also the folks at freebirds. I may as well resign from there now that I suppose I outed myself as well. I didnt do a whole hell of alot there. I really didnt have time due to work. I read all what Kyle has posted and PLEASE people.. listen to Kermit..Jen and Wingnut.

Now.. I guess I differed this thread.. lol  Anyhow.. I really need to go and get a shower and get the hell out of the house~!

Have a Happy New Year everyone !!

Jen and Wing.. I apologize.. but reading page after page after page.. I wanted others to know you guys are not full of shit !!
 ::MonkeyCool::

Make it 5  ::MonkeyCool::

And I've never been more proud. (And I guess I'm an 'ex' bird, too, Ang sweetie)

I've been a monkey since June 4, 2005 -- and I've never been more proud of that, either.

I can say in all honesty that on our research site, I witnessed the 'conversations' and events in the way that jen, winger and kermit have detailed.

Happy New Year everyone

Justice for Natalee Holloway
Peace for her family and loved ones.




Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #788 12/31/08 -
Post by: truthseeker2 on December 31, 2008, 05:13:02 PM

Yeah, I don't think we can hold our breath for that either.  I agree that people on Aruba know.  But, what do they know?  I will say/ask again, albeit rhetorical, What truth is so horrific that those in charge on Aruba are willing to let the entire island suffer for it instead of letting the truth come out?  There must be people in Aruba who made that decision and decided the truth was worse than a justifiable end to the torment they caused a family.  They decided the entire island will pay for this.  If I was living in Aruba I would be really pizzed off!

Well, Kyle told us about another "witness" who approached them.  With his...........I think brother?  This "witness" said he had a vision.  Gave them coordinates out to sea.  This brother of the witness was an Aruban detective.

The coordinates were pretty much right on the fish trap.

Kyle's supposition (and I agree) was that there was no vision.  Either this person or his ALE brother already KNEW where Natalee's remains were, and were using the idea of a "vision" as their "out" in telling about it.

So - just one more reason why Persistence crew need to be talked to regarding what went on while they were in Aruba.

They know this detective's name.  That could open up a LOT regarding the initial cover up from 2005.

Yeah, I read about all that.  Supposed to be Clyde Burke, also suspected to have been Simian at one time.  If the trap turns out to be nothing related to Natalee, if we ever find out the truth about the trap, then I suspect Clyde Burke and his relative were either doing a little detective work on their own and deduced the trap would be a possible location or they were putting on a show.

If we find out the trap did contain evidence of where Natalee was...then Clyde Burke and his relative are heroes.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #788 12/31/08 -
Post by: Keepthefaith on December 31, 2008, 05:15:32 PM

Yeah, I don't think we can hold our breath for that either.  I agree that people on Aruba know.  But, what do they know?  I will say/ask again, albeit rhetorical, What truth is so horrific that those in charge on Aruba are willing to let the entire island suffer for it instead of letting the truth come out?  There must be people in Aruba who made that decision and decided the truth was worse than a justifiable end to the torment they caused a family.  They decided the entire island will pay for this.  If I was living in Aruba I would be really pizzed off!

Well, Kyle told us about another "witness" who approached them.  With his...........I think brother?  This "witness" said he had a vision.  Gave them coordinates out to sea.  This brother of the witness was an Aruban detective.

The coordinates were pretty much right on the fish trap.

Kyle's supposition (and I agree) was that there was no vision.  Either this person or his ALE brother already KNEW where Natalee's remains were, and were using the idea of a "vision" as their "out" in telling about it.

So - just one more reason why Persistence crew need to be talked to regarding what went on while they were in Aruba.

They know this detective's name.  That could open up a LOT regarding the initial cover up from 2005.

Yeah, I read about all that.  Supposed to be Clyde Burke, also suspected to have been Simian at one time.  If the trap turns out to be nothing related to Natalee, if we ever find out the truth about the trap, then I suspect Clyde Burke and his relative were either doing a little detective work on their own and deduced the trap would be a possible location or they were putting on a show.

If we find out the trap did contain evidence of where Natalee was...then Clyde Burke and his relative are heroes.

Only if we knew what the contents of the cage/Trap were if anything at all!


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #788 12/31/08 -
Post by: jen3560 on December 31, 2008, 05:18:57 PM
I would like to know how Lisa purports to know what Kyle posted or did not post in Freebirds. 3 actual members (Kermit, wingnut, and jen) relay what/when he actually posted. Kyle doesn't refute what they say to anyone but Lisa or Hotshot. I can understand you believing any and everything Kyle tells you personally -- but to totally dismiss what people WHO WERE THERE (Freebirds) say is simply putting your head in the sand.

Ummm.. make it 4 now...  ::MonkeyCool::

I been reading several pages.. and YES.. I read and seen it all. So.. I can say in all honesty.. I cak up 100% what Kermit, Jen and Wingnut are posting. I love yah all here at SM and also the folks at freebirds. I may as well resign from there now that I suppose I outed myself as well. I didnt do a whole hell of alot there. I really didnt have time due to work. I read all what Kyle has posted and PLEASE people.. listen to Kermit..Jen and Wingnut.

Now.. I guess I differed this thread.. lol  Anyhow.. I really need to go and get a shower and get the hell out of the house~!

Have a Happy New Year everyone !!

Jen and Wing.. I apologize.. but reading page after page after page.. I wanted others to know you guys are not full of shit !!
 ::MonkeyCool::

Make it 5  ::MonkeyCool::

And I've never been more proud. (And I guess I'm an 'ex' bird, too, Ang sweetie)

I've been a monkey since June 4, 2005 -- and I've never been more proud of that, either.

I can say in all honesty that on our research site, I witnessed the 'conversations' and events in the way that jen, winger and kermit have detailed.

Happy New Year everyone

Justice for Natalee Holloway
Peace for her family and loved ones.




Hiya Sharon!

Gosh!

I love our monkey birdies!  Each and every one of you!!

Thanks for all the support guys!  Not only for today, but also for the last 2.5 years.  None of you had to do this - and that you chose to...................well, it means the world to me!!

You are all fantastic people - with hearts of gold, that my faith and trust will forever be with!


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #788 12/31/08 -
Post by: klaasend on December 31, 2008, 05:19:06 PM
Quote
Hotshot wrote:

---------------------------------------------------------------------
Destiny and ******* started up their own private forum.  (Assumption WRONG)!
--------------------------------------------------------------------

Actually Mrskub started the forum in November and Destiny and ******* are moderators.  Going to say that's wrong too? 

And yes, I happen to know you,Capslock, Lala's, Yaps are members there as well and Johan and many others.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #788 12/31/08 -
Post by: jen3560 on December 31, 2008, 05:21:32 PM

Yeah, I don't think we can hold our breath for that either.  I agree that people on Aruba know.  But, what do they know?  I will say/ask again, albeit rhetorical, What truth is so horrific that those in charge on Aruba are willing to let the entire island suffer for it instead of letting the truth come out?  There must be people in Aruba who made that decision and decided the truth was worse than a justifiable end to the torment they caused a family.  They decided the entire island will pay for this.  If I was living in Aruba I would be really pizzed off!

Well, Kyle told us about another "witness" who approached them.  With his...........I think brother?  This "witness" said he had a vision.  Gave them coordinates out to sea.  This brother of the witness was an Aruban detective.

The coordinates were pretty much right on the fish trap.

Kyle's supposition (and I agree) was that there was no vision.  Either this person or his ALE brother already KNEW where Natalee's remains were, and were using the idea of a "vision" as their "out" in telling about it.

So - just one more reason why Persistence crew need to be talked to regarding what went on while they were in Aruba.

They know this detective's name.  That could open up a LOT regarding the initial cover up from 2005.

Yeah, I read about all that.  Supposed to be Clyde Burke, also suspected to have been Simian at one time.  If the trap turns out to be nothing related to Natalee, if we ever find out the truth about the trap, then I suspect Clyde Burke and his relative were either doing a little detective work on their own and deduced the trap would be a possible location or they were putting on a show.

If we find out the trap did contain evidence of where Natalee was...then Clyde Burke and his relative are heroes.

I'm not so positive that was Clyde.

I know the ALE officer Caps is familiar with is Clyde Burke.

But regardless of who it was, he could provide a lot of answers - not the least of which was how he knew about Natalee's remains.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #788 12/31/08 -
Post by: snoopy on December 31, 2008, 05:25:19 PM
I would like to know how Lisa purports to know what Kyle posted or did not post in Freebirds. 3 actual members (Kermit, wingnut, and jen) relay what/when he actually posted. Kyle doesn't refute what they say to anyone but Lisa or Hotshot. I can understand you believing any and everything Kyle tells you personally -- but to totally dismiss what people WHO WERE THERE (Freebirds) say is simply putting your head in the sand.

Ummm.. make it 4 now...  ::MonkeyCool::

I been reading several pages.. and YES.. I read and seen it all. So.. I can say in all honesty.. I cak up 100% what Kermit, Jen and Wingnut are posting. I love yah all here at SM and also the folks at freebirds. I may as well resign from there now that I suppose I outed myself as well. I didnt do a whole hell of alot there. I really didnt have time due to work. I read all what Kyle has posted and PLEASE people.. listen to Kermit..Jen and Wingnut.

Now.. I guess I differed this thread.. lol  Anyhow.. I really need to go and get a shower and get the hell out of the house~!

Have a Happy New Year everyone !!

Jen and Wing.. I apologize.. but reading page after page after page.. I wanted others to know you guys are not full of shit !!
 ::MonkeyCool::

Good to see you Angie!!  Hope you are doing well.  I for one have never doubted them.  When Klaas posted the letter yesterday I knew it had to be legitimate or Klaas would have never posted.  And if these people weren't who they said they were Klaas would have been all over it.  I'll stand with Klaas any day.  And anyone that bashes Klaas can kiss my a**.......you know.

Thank you for backing them up.  You're a good gal.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #788 12/31/08 -
Post by: jen3560 on December 31, 2008, 05:28:09 PM
from Greta's blog:

If all goes as planned (and yes, this is a breaking news business and plans can be aborted at the last minute), we are going ON THE ROAD beginning Sunday morning.  This means I need YOU to help more than you already do here on GretaWire.  I know that all of you already do much of the “heavy lifting” here on GretaWire but this is a special week in that I am unsure how much I can blog.  I need  you all to take a bigger role while I am gone. I have asked a colleague to post OPEN THREADS in case I can not. I am hoping to blog from my various destinations (and there are several), but I can’t be sure.   Hence I need you to all be ready to pick up the slack in case I can’t blog. I will give you more information later….but in the meantime, will all of you help more than you already do?
----------------

Anyone think she's accompanying JQK to Aruba?  Brinkman is also supposed to be there next week.

This could get interesting!

I wonder if any of Natalee's family will be going as well?



Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #788 12/31/08 -
Post by: sharon on December 31, 2008, 05:29:18 PM

Hiya Sharon!

Gosh!

I love our monkey birdies!  Each and every one of you!!

Thanks for all the support guys!  Not only for today, but also for the last 2.5 years.  None of you had to do this - and that you chose to...................well, it means the world to me!!

You are all fantastic people - with hearts of gold, that my faith and trust will forever be with!

It has been my privilege, jen  ::MonkeyCool::

I feel the same about klaas and SM as well.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #788 12/31/08 -
Post by: KYcat on December 31, 2008, 05:31:11 PM
HELLO TO ALL OLD AND NEW MONKEYS!  I have been actually busy doing work today LOL .... Now I have to go out to dinner with friends and celebrate the new year.  I wish I could spend it here with you all. 

I have to make a comment and then I am gone .........

My opinion of Kyle came from my own observations long before anyone came on this board and exposed him.
My opinion of him has not changed.  I felt from reading his posts that he contradicted himself, was condescending towards others and not truthful.  Now that more has come out, I feel that I was correct about him long ago.  No one stirred my pot, so to speak. 

There are many things that I am sure we still do not know.  But, honestly, the pieces seem to be fitting together and making more sense now. 

Nuff' said.

BBL

HAPPY HAPPY NEW YEAR TO YOU GUYS!   

 ::MonkeyCool::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #788 12/31/08 -
Post by: klaasend on December 31, 2008, 05:31:52 PM
from Greta's blog:

If all goes as planned (and yes, this is a breaking news business and plans can be aborted at the last minute), we are going ON THE ROAD beginning Sunday morning.  This means I need YOU to help more than you already do here on GretaWire.  I know that all of you already do much of the “heavy lifting” here on GretaWire but this is a special week in that I am unsure how much I can blog.  I need  you all to take a bigger role while I am gone. I have asked a colleague to post OPEN THREADS in case I can not. I am hoping to blog from my various destinations (and there are several), but I can’t be sure.   Hence I need you to all be ready to pick up the slack in case I can’t blog. I will give you more information later….but in the meantime, will all of you help more than you already do?
----------------

Anyone think she's accompanying JQK to Aruba?  Brinkman is also supposed to be there next week.

This could get interesting!

I wonder if any of Natalee's family will be going as well?



I had forgotten that JQK said he was going to Aruba the first of the year and I'd bet Greta is tagging along.  My guess is Beth will not be going unless there is progress but I could be wrong. 


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #788 12/31/08 -
Post by: KYcat on December 31, 2008, 05:33:47 PM
I MEANT NUFF' SAID FOR ME, YOU GUYS KEEP ON KEEPING ON.....


 ::MonkeyHaHa::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #788 12/31/08 -
Post by: klaasend on December 31, 2008, 05:34:11 PM
I MEANT NUFF' SAID FOR ME, YOU GUYS KEEP ON KEEPING ON.....


 ::MonkeyHaHa::

 ::MonkeyHaHa::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #788 12/31/08 -
Post by: Hotshot on December 31, 2008, 05:34:21 PM
Quote
Hotshot wrote:

---------------------------------------------------------------------
Destiny and ******* started up their own private forum.  (Assumption WRONG)!
--------------------------------------------------------------------

Actually Mrskub started the forum in November and Destiny and ******* are moderators.  Going to say that's wrong too? 

And yes, I happen to know you,Capslock, Lala's, Yaps are members there as well and Johan and many others.
yes that is correct.  And  there are many others...  Not a big deal.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #788 12/31/08 -
Post by: wingnut on December 31, 2008, 05:36:21 PM
I would like to know how Lisa purports to know what Kyle posted or did not post in Freebirds. 3 actual members (Kermit, wingnut, and jen) relay what/when he actually posted. Kyle doesn't refute what they say to anyone but Lisa or Hotshot. I can understand you believing any and everything Kyle tells you personally -- but to totally dismiss what people WHO WERE THERE (Freebirds) say is simply putting your head in the sand.

Ummm.. make it 4 now...  ::MonkeyCool::

I been reading several pages.. and YES.. I read and seen it all. So.. I can say in all honesty.. I cak up 100% what Kermit, Jen and Wingnut are posting. I love yah all here at SM and also the folks at freebirds. I may as well resign from there now that I suppose I outed myself as well. I didnt do a whole hell of alot there. I really didnt have time due to work. I read all what Kyle has posted and PLEASE people.. listen to Kermit..Jen and Wingnut.

Now.. I guess I differed this thread.. lol  Anyhow.. I really need to go and get a shower and get the hell out of the house~!

Have a Happy New Year everyone !!

Jen and Wing.. I apologize.. but reading page after page after page.. I wanted others to know you guys are not full of shit !!
 ::MonkeyCool::

Make it 5  ::MonkeyCool::

And I've never been more proud. (And I guess I'm an 'ex' bird, too, Ang sweetie)

I've been a monkey since June 4, 2005 -- and I've never been more proud of that, either.

I can say in all honesty that on our research site, I witnessed the 'conversations' and events in the way that jen, winger and kermit have detailed.

Happy New Year everyone

Justice for Natalee Holloway
Peace for her family and loved ones.





Howdy Sharon!  Happy to be posting with you, but sad that the Freebird era has ended.  We had some times, didn't we???

 


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #788 12/31/08 -
Post by: Tamikosmom on December 31, 2008, 05:41:00 PM


Maybe is crap, but didn't Kyle himself raise the issue of Silvetti's loyalties which I believe is why he's in hot water.

Yes, he certainly did.  He told us in no uncertain terms that he felt Silvetti's intentions began as honorable - but that his focus shifted.

Also that Silvetti didn't want to question ALE about their insistence the cage was "not relevant" for fear of ruining newly made friendships and contacts.  Because Silvetti had plans to open an office on the island and do business in S America and Aruba.

FWIW - Kyle also never, ever believed in this whole pond witness thing, until the very end when we were wanting to publish our document containing the cage images and Kyle's words.

Then all of a sudden he says the pond witness is "credible", and Silvetti is, after all, "trustworthy".


I took that with a whole dumptruck of salt.


AND, as I recall - his sudden "about face" came out of nowhere.  After he had been absent from the forum for, ummm, two months or so?  We were like WTF?

It was Kyle's futile attempt at damage control ... a futile attempt at negating all he had shared regarding the John Silvetti's endeavor to assist the ALE in the finale' to the great Aruban coverup.

Janet


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #788 12/31/08 -
Post by: wingnut on December 31, 2008, 05:42:06 PM

Thanks for all the support guys!  Not only for today, but also for the last 2.5 years.  None of you had to do this - and that you chose to...................well, it means the world to me!!
You are all fantastic people - with hearts of gold, that my faith and trust will forever be with!


We had to stand up for Kermit.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #788 12/31/08 -
Post by: Keepthefaith on December 31, 2008, 05:42:48 PM
.....JUSTICE FOR NATALEE........TRUTH........IT WILL PREVAIL......................................


 ::MonkeyDance:: ::MonkeyDance:: ::MonkeyDance:: ::MonkeyDance:: ::MonkeyDance::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #788 12/31/08 -
Post by: Tamikosmom on December 31, 2008, 05:43:14 PM
Quote
. . John Silvetti moved the contents of the trap to the pond and was working with the ALE to hide evidence that was in that trap.

Now what in the world could be the reason for Silvetti to do that?!
Who is buying that crap ::MonkeyNoNo::

bastibro

Who is the source of the words "John Silvetti moved the contents of the trap to the pond and was working with the ALE to hide evidence that was in that trap."

Link please.

Thank you.

Janet


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #788 12/31/08 -
Post by: Magnolia on December 31, 2008, 05:47:27 PM
HELLO TO ALL OLD AND NEW MONKEYS!  I have been actually busy doing work today LOL .... Now I have to go out to dinner with friends and celebrate the new year.  I wish I could spend it here with you all. 

I have to make a comment and then I am gone .........

My opinion of Kyle came from my own observations long before anyone came on this board and exposed him.
My opinion of him has not changed.  I felt from reading his posts that he contradicted himself, was condescending towards others and not truthful.  Now that more has come out, I feel that I was correct about him long ago.  No one stirred my pot, so to speak. 

There are many things that I am sure we still do not know.  But, honestly, the pieces seem to be fitting together and making more sense now. 

Nuff' said.

BBL

HAPPY HAPPY NEW YEAR TO YOU GUYS!   

 ::MonkeyCool::

Happy New Year to you KYcat


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #788 12/31/08 -
Post by: jen3560 on December 31, 2008, 05:49:24 PM
Quote
. . John Silvetti moved the contents of the trap to the pond and was working with the ALE to hide evidence that was in that trap.

Now what in the world could be the reason for Silvetti to do that?!
Who is buying that crap ::MonkeyNoNo::

bastibro

Who is the source of the words "John Silvetti moved the contents of the trap to the pond and was working with the ALE to hide evidence that was in that trap."

Link please.

Thank you.

Janet

Janet,

If I'm not mistaken - those are ldstlou's words.  After she twisted and spun and misconstrued some speculation regarding Caps' assertions that there are human remains and a sneaker to be found "in the pond".


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #788 12/31/08 -
Post by: Tamikosmom on December 31, 2008, 05:49:43 PM

It appears Kyle had internet access while he was in Egypt, or at least it looks that way from his blog:

http://kylekingman.blogspot.com/

http://geosolutions.blogspot.com/

 ::cartwheel::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #788 12/31/08 -
Post by: Keepthefaith on December 31, 2008, 05:51:34 PM
Hi Mum!I'll be awaiting your post regarding me stirring the pot and what my reasoning is for?? ::MonkeyDance:: ::MonkeyDance:: ::MonkeyDance::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #788 12/31/08 -
Post by: klaasend on December 31, 2008, 05:57:37 PM
Quote
Hotshot wrote:

---------------------------------------------------------------------
Destiny and ******* started up their own private forum.  (Assumption WRONG)!
--------------------------------------------------------------------

Actually Mrskub started the forum in November and Destiny and ******* are moderators.  Going to say that's wrong too? 

And yes, I happen to know you,Capslock, Lala's, Yaps are members there as well and Johan and many others.
yes that is correct.  And  there are many others...  Not a big deal.

It is a big deal in the respect that Destiny and ******* are spreading lies about ME.  Other than that no.  It does make me wonder about people who choose to be a member of a forum where the moderators are known to lie.  But if that's your choice so be it.  ::MonkeyRoll::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #788 12/31/08 -
Post by: bleachedblack on December 31, 2008, 05:59:05 PM
Please fill me in on the latest with URINE...he is in Laos??

Yes, the louse is in Laos.  Hanging out at some bars that appear to attack tourists.  (Some things never change)

I really can't believe someone hasn't beat the crap  out of him yet.....and disappear his body

Me either, Sunny.  He just seems to drift from place to place drinking, smoking his weed and losing his money.  I would love to know who is financing his journeys.

Maybe someone with the intention of writing a book?


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #788 12/31/08 -
Post by: Keepthefaith on December 31, 2008, 06:07:19 PM
HAPPY NEW YEAR TO ALL MONKEY'S..GOOD THINGS TO COME IN 09'

KEEPTHEFAITH......JUSTICE FOR NATALEE.......TRUTH WILL PREVAIL.....


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #788 12/31/08 -
Post by: Tamikosmom on December 31, 2008, 06:07:21 PM

I didn't dismiss anything Wreck. I simply asked Kyle questions. I said before, Kyle walked away with some concerns about the conduct of the Arubans  and some strange coincidences that went on. I can understand that perfectly. He didn't hide those concerns...how in the heck did the Freebirds get the info if he was hiding it? He discussed the concerns with them! How do we go from he had some questions as to what transpired via the ALE...to yesterday Kermit states the suspicions are that John Silvetti removed evidence from the trap and placed it in the pond?

1.  Arubans!!!  Kyle Kingman also revealed that he had suspicions regarding John Silvetti.

Kyle: John stood back and waited and worked with the Aruban Polis

Kyle: John definitely believed the Arubans at their every word

Kyle: John didn't want Tim Miller on board the Persistence because he said Tim wasn't necessary any more and was a liability

Kyle: John told me then he didn't want to hear me ever mention the trap again.

Kyle: I did not feel the same and we had a major difference in opinion. He [John Silvetti] was the one who never pressed ALE to be completely open with us with the trap evidence. I would have forced them to. However, John was the one paying my invoices so I was forced to sit back and hope for the best.

Kyle: John Silvetti told me today that he may be returning to Aruba very soon for a few days.

Kyle: I couldn't get the logs from the Persistence. All things "Holloway" were stripped from the boat once it got back to Louisiana

Kyle: John is not a believer in the trap. He took ALE's word as gospel that it wasn't case related, yet never studied the videos or bothered to inquire further. He had plans on doing business with Aruba and in S. America and he didn't want to hurt any feelings by talks hinting at lack of complete trust and friendship.


2.  Lou ... please provide me with a link to where "Kermit states the suspicions are that John Silvetti removed evidence from the trap and placed it in the pond".

Janet


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #788 12/31/08 -
Post by: jen3560 on December 31, 2008, 06:10:09 PM

Thanks for all the support guys!  Not only for today, but also for the last 2.5 years.  None of you had to do this - and that you chose to...................well, it means the world to me!!
You are all fantastic people - with hearts of gold, that my faith and trust will forever be with!


We had to stand up for Kermit.

Yes - we certainly did!


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #788 12/31/08 -
Post by: klaasend on December 31, 2008, 06:12:37 PM

I didn't dismiss anything Wreck. I simply asked Kyle questions. I said before, Kyle walked away with some concerns about the conduct of the Arubans  and some strange coincidences that went on. I can understand that perfectly. He didn't hide those concerns...how in the heck did the Freebirds get the info if he was hiding it? He discussed the concerns with them! How do we go from he had some questions as to what transpired via the ALE...to yesterday Kermit states the suspicions are that John Silvetti removed evidence from the trap and placed it in the pond?

1.  Arubans!!!  Kyle Kingman also revealed that he had suspicions regarding John Silvetti.

Kyle: John stood back and waited and worked with the Aruban Polis

Kyle: John definitely believed the Arubans at their every word

Kyle: John didn't want Tim Miller on board the Persistence because he said Tim wasn't necessary any more and was a liability

Kyle: John told me then he didn't want to hear me ever mention the trap again.

Kyle: I did not feel the same and we had a major difference in opinion. He [John Silvetti] was the one who never pressed ALE to be completely open with us with the trap evidence. I would have forced them to. However, John was the one paying my invoices so I was forced to sit back and hope for the best.

Kyle: John Silvetti told me today that he may be returning to Aruba very soon for a few days.

Kyle: I couldn't get the logs from the Persistence. All things "Holloway" were stripped from the boat once it got back to Louisiana

Kyle: John is not a believer in the trap. He took ALE's word as gospel that it wasn't case related, yet never studied the videos or bothered to inquire further. He had plans on doing business with Aruba and in S. America and he didn't want to hurt any feelings by talks hinting at lack of complete trust and friendship.


2.  Lou ... please provide me with a link to where "Kermit states the suspicions are that John Silvetti removed evidence from the trap and placed it in the pond".

Janet

Janet - I believe it's in this post of Kermits.

http://scaredmonkeys.net/index.php?topic=4269.msg604296#msg604296

Quote
Remember Hotshot (Kathy Drenga) just recently told the monkeys that it was HER who directed Caps (and the witness) to Silvetti.
 
Could this REALLY be the first sign to prove the suspicions that Silvetti gave something from that trap to be put in the pond?  Shoe?  Skull? - speculation.



Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #788 12/31/08 -
Post by: Kermit on December 31, 2008, 06:13:19 PM
Wingnut, Jen, Angie, Sharon, Thank you all for risking exposing yourselves for justice for Natalee.
I stand proudly with you all and hopefully as a monkey in a frog suit.



Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #788 12/31/08 -
Post by: klaasend on December 31, 2008, 06:13:23 PM
Bleachedblack - you mean like Patrick van der Eem?


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #788 12/31/08 -
Post by: Kermit on December 31, 2008, 06:15:13 PM
MumInOhio
Scared Monkey
*
Offline Offline
Posts: 6075
View Profile

Re: Natalee Case Discussion #787 12/24/08 -
« Reply #910 on: Today at 04:21:30 AM »
page 46 of thread: http://scaredmonkeys.net/index.php?topic=4269.900

Mum,
With all due respect, I never saw your posts or post asking about CAPS and his emails.
YES I have them.
I posted one as proof, Klassend edited it for obvious reasons, and whoever saw it as well as the admin,
can now vouch that I do, in fact have emails of CAPS.
Hope that answers your question concerning the truth of that.


As for the second query of cutting pasting.
Please look back at when CAPS specifically said I was lying about him never posting about MOKO

You know how I knew he was the liar and trying to discredit me, it's because I was the ONE who was ASKED
to not only trace those apartments, BUT also to track his IP.

So you may choose to believe I am cutting pasting to suit whatever, but you are incorrect.
I'm am trying to give insight into what has been going on.

Now, please, next time rather then accuse me of not answering your specific questions, and therefore coming to the conclusion you just can't trust what I say, try to understand I am not here 24/7, I do have a very busy schedule and I try as best as I can to be respectful and not accusatory unless someone gives me cause.
Thank you for your time.

sincerely,
kermit



Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #788 12/31/08 -
Post by: Kermit on December 31, 2008, 06:15:51 PM

klaasend
Administrator
Monkey All Star
*
Online Online
Posts: 45530
View Profile WWW   
Re: Natalee Case Discussion #788 12/31/08 -
« Reply #43 on: Today at 12:17:40 PM »

Klassend is correct in that Dave has Mark Purcell checking out what Caps tells Dave.








Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #788 12/31/08 -
Post by: jen3560 on December 31, 2008, 06:18:49 PM

klaasend
Administrator
Monkey All Star
*
Online Online
Posts: 45530
View Profile WWW   
Re: Natalee Case Discussion #788 12/31/08 -
« Reply #43 on: Today at 12:17:40 PM »

Klassend is correct in that Dave has Mark Purcell checking out what Caps tells Dave.








And that, in and of itself, is horribly, horribly frightening!


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #788 12/31/08 -
Post by: Kermit on December 31, 2008, 06:18:59 PM
That's because Klassend is not only an amazing administrator, but as a human being, she really is a first class woman.

AND don't even anyone twist what I just said, because I am not saying it to kiss up, nor do I live near Klassend etc. She can ban my buttinsky and I WILL AND WOULD SAY WHAT I SAY BECAUSE IT IS HOW I THINK OF HER.

end of my statement.

The other moderators are exceptional!
I'm not saying this for any other reason, they can ban my buttinsky too and I think I will still say it because it is what I believe. I could NEVER do what you all do. I just have a low propensity for certain things and this would be one.

I just want to THANK YOU ALL FOR YOUR HARD WORK AND DEDICATION TO THE LITTLE GIRL NAMED NATALEE!

WHO WE WANT BACK ARUBA! NOW!



Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #788 12/31/08 -
Post by: Kermit on December 31, 2008, 06:20:01 PM

klaasend
Administrator
Monkey All Star
*
Online Online
Posts: 45530
View Profile WWW   
Re: Natalee Case Discussion #788 12/31/08 -
« Reply #43 on: Today at 12:17:40 PM »

Klassend is correct in that Dave has Mark Purcell checking out what Caps tells Dave.








And that, in and of itself, is horribly, horribly frightening!

Yes it is.



Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #788 12/31/08 -
Post by: Kermit on December 31, 2008, 06:20:52 PM
GET A CLUE IDSTLOU
http://scaredmonkeys.net/index.php?topic=4328.180
Kermit
Re: Natalee Case Discussion #780 11/26/08 -
« Reply #897 on: Today at 03:02:28 AM »

Kyle: “I did not feel the same and we had a major difference in opinion. He [John Silvetti] was the one who never pressed ALE to be completely open with us with the trap evidence. I would have forced them to. However, John was the one paying my invoices so I was forced to sit back and hope for the best.”



Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #788 12/31/08 -
Post by: Tamikosmom on December 31, 2008, 06:21:41 PM
LADIES & GENTLEMEN.....

Here in one hand we have Freebirds, Kermit, Jen, Wingnut, Angie and Rob.
all attesting to Kyle's post and ROV images that were posted at
the Freebirds site, but not turned over to authorities.  By his own
admission, Kyle tried to sell those images for his own profit.  All five
of these people say this is the truth.

In the other hand we have Kyle........

Who do you believe?

Magnolia

This is what I fail to comprehend also.

Considering Kyle's own words which were exposed by Kermit and ... affirmed by Jen and Wingnut ... I would have thought Monkeys would have been one in condemning the John S. and the Persistence undertaking.

Think about it.  If Natalee Holloway's remains were in that trap/cage ... in all probability ... the opportunity for the family to bring her home to rest on American soil has been lost forever.

 ::MonkeyNoNo::

Janet

_______


'Scarborough Country' for July 14
updated 8:45 a.m. PT, Fri., July. 15, 2005


JUG TWITTY, NATALEE HOLLOWAY'S STEPFATHER: Beth and I have been through this emotional roller coaster. And all we want is Natalee, whether she's alive or dead. We want to bring her back to the United States, and we'll leave and they can do whatever they want to do.

http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/8551824/


'The Abrams Report' for July 1
updated 7:47 a.m. PT, Wed., July. 6, 2005


BETH HOLLOWAY TWITTY, NATALEE HOLLOWAY'S MOTHER:  We cannot forget to demand and expect to have Natalee.  Natalee deserves to return to her country.  She deserves it, and everyone knows it, Martin, every single person.  Every single person knows that.  They know it.

http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/8485029/


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #788 12/31/08 -
Post by: klaasend on December 31, 2008, 06:21:43 PM

klaasend
Administrator
Monkey All Star
*
Online Online
Posts: 45530
View Profile WWW   
Re: Natalee Case Discussion #788 12/31/08 -
« Reply #43 on: Today at 12:17:40 PM »

Klassend is correct in that Dave has Mark Purcell checking out what Caps tells Dave.








And that, in and of itself, is horribly, horribly frightening!

Questions were posted back in February I think.  Who was the "leak".  IMO the leak is coming direct from Dave Holloway via Robin and Mark Purcell.  Sorry to say but that's how I feel.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #788 12/31/08 -
Post by: Kermit on December 31, 2008, 06:21:58 PM
Kyle said: "neither Dave, Robin, or Beth has seen any of the ROV footage aside from what was broadcasted on Dateline or the pictures leaked from the FBI to Dave (and Robin H.). Beth has seen nothing in my knowledge."


OBSTRUCTION OF JUSTICE



Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #788 12/31/08 -
Post by: Keepthefaith on December 31, 2008, 06:22:10 PM
GET A CLUE IDSTLOU
http://scaredmonkeys.net/index.php?topic=4328.180
Kermit
Re: Natalee Case Discussion #780 11/26/08 -
« Reply #897 on: Today at 03:02:28 AM »

Kyle: “I did not feel the same and we had a major difference in opinion. He [John Silvetti] was the one who never pressed ALE to be completely open with us with the trap evidence. I would have forced them to. However, John was the one paying my invoices so I was forced to sit back and hope for the best.”



And.Is still paying his invoices?Is that correct?Kermit,Wingnut,Jen??


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #788 12/31/08 -
Post by: jen3560 on December 31, 2008, 06:22:58 PM

klaasend
Administrator
Monkey All Star
*
Online Online
Posts: 45530
View Profile WWW   
Re: Natalee Case Discussion #788 12/31/08 -
« Reply #43 on: Today at 12:17:40 PM »

Klassend is correct in that Dave has Mark Purcell checking out what Caps tells Dave.








And that, in and of itself, is horribly, horribly frightening!

Yes it is.



And what does that tell you about the veracity of this "witness"?

Dave believed in this witness at one time - and if Purcell was endorsing all of it...................well, there you have it.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #788 12/31/08 -
Post by: Kermit on December 31, 2008, 06:23:19 PM
ldstlou
Scared Monkey
*
Offline Offline
Posts: 4866
View Profile
   
Re: Natalee Case Discussion #788 12/31/08 -
« Reply #35 on: Today at 12:09:02 PM »
The posts are copied and pasted from the Freebird's forum...taken out of context.

Show us the ones taken out of context.
http://scaredmonkeys.net/index.php?topic=4328.20



Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #788 12/31/08 -
Post by: Kermit on December 31, 2008, 06:24:06 PM
ldstlou
Scared Monkey
*
Offline Offline
Posts: 4866
View Profile
Re: Natalee Case Discussion #788 12/31/08 -
« Reply #70 on: Today at 12:51:07 PM »
http://scaredmonkeys.net/index.php?topic=4328.60

Not knowing about the Freebirds or where she got them I was suspicious of posts that were copied and pasted out of context. So I called Jug, then I IM'ed Kyle

This implies you were in contact WITH KYLE long before I ever posted anything

Supports what I told everyone. ::MonkeyEek::






ldstlou
Scared Monkey
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 4866



View Profile
   
   
Re: Natalee Case Discussion #788 12/31/08 -
« Reply #181 on: Today at 02:31:22 PM »

wingnut, see this is what irks me...you tell half truths for your own agenda. He was gone for 2 months because he was on a ship in Egypt for crying out loud...why make it out to be anything more than it was?
http://scaredmonkeys.net/index.php?topic=4328.180







Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #788 12/31/08 -
Post by: jen3560 on December 31, 2008, 06:24:49 PM

klaasend
Administrator
Monkey All Star
*
Online Online
Posts: 45530
View Profile WWW   
Re: Natalee Case Discussion #788 12/31/08 -
« Reply #43 on: Today at 12:17:40 PM »

Klassend is correct in that Dave has Mark Purcell checking out what Caps tells Dave.








And that, in and of itself, is horribly, horribly frightening!

Questions were posted back in February I think.  Who was the "leak".  IMO the leak is coming direct from Dave Holloway via Robin and Mark Purcell.  Sorry to say but that's how I feel.

I don't feel you are at all wrong.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #788 12/31/08 -
Post by: jen3560 on December 31, 2008, 06:25:59 PM
GET A CLUE IDSTLOU
http://scaredmonkeys.net/index.php?topic=4328.180
Kermit
Re: Natalee Case Discussion #780 11/26/08 -
« Reply #897 on: Today at 03:02:28 AM »

Kyle: “I did not feel the same and we had a major difference in opinion. He [John Silvetti] was the one who never pressed ALE to be completely open with us with the trap evidence. I would have forced them to. However, John was the one paying my invoices so I was forced to sit back and hope for the best.”



And.Is still paying his invoices?Is that correct?Kermit,Wingnut,Jen??

Well he certainly was for the trip Kyle took to the North Sea and to Egypt this past fall.

Since then - I have not a clue.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #788 12/31/08 -
Post by: Kermit on December 31, 2008, 06:27:41 PM
Idstlou
Scared Monkey
*
Offline Offline
Posts: 4866
View Profile
   
   
Re: Natalee Case Discussion #788 12/31/08 -
« Reply #181 on: Today at 02:31:22 PM »

wingnut, see this is what irks me...you tell half truths for your own agenda. He was gone for 2 months because he was on a ship in Egypt for crying out loud...why make it out to be anything more than it was?
http://scaredmonkeys.net/index.php?topic=4328.180


John Silvetti was the project manager for the Egypt project that Kyle was sent on.
You know, that little company of his that merged with  ::MonkeyShocked:: THE DUTCH!

Kyle: “I did not feel the same and we had a major difference in opinion. He [John Silvetti] was the one who never pressed ALE to be completely open with us with the trap evidence. I would have forced them to. However, John was the one paying my invoices so I was forced to sit back and hope for the best.”


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #788 12/31/08 -
Post by: Tamikosmom on December 31, 2008, 06:28:29 PM

I didn't dismiss anything Wreck. I simply asked Kyle questions. I said before, Kyle walked away with some concerns about the conduct of the Arubans  and some strange coincidences that went on. I can understand that perfectly. He didn't hide those concerns...how in the heck did the Freebirds get the info if he was hiding it? He discussed the concerns with them! How do we go from he had some questions as to what transpired via the ALE...to yesterday Kermit states the suspicions are that John Silvetti removed evidence from the trap and placed it in the pond?

1.  Arubans!!!  Kyle Kingman also revealed that he had suspicions regarding John Silvetti.

Kyle: John stood back and waited and worked with the Aruban Polis

Kyle: John definitely believed the Arubans at their every word

Kyle: John didn't want Tim Miller on board the Persistence because he said Tim wasn't necessary any more and was a liability

Kyle: John told me then he didn't want to hear me ever mention the trap again.

Kyle: I did not feel the same and we had a major difference in opinion. He [John Silvetti] was the one who never pressed ALE to be completely open with us with the trap evidence. I would have forced them to. However, John was the one paying my invoices so I was forced to sit back and hope for the best.

Kyle: John Silvetti told me today that he may be returning to Aruba very soon for a few days.

Kyle: I couldn't get the logs from the Persistence. All things "Holloway" were stripped from the boat once it got back to Louisiana

Kyle: John is not a believer in the trap. He took ALE's word as gospel that it wasn't case related, yet never studied the videos or bothered to inquire further. He had plans on doing business with Aruba and in S. America and he didn't want to hurt any feelings by talks hinting at lack of complete trust and friendship.


2.  Lou ... please provide me with a link to where "Kermit states the suspicions are that John Silvetti removed evidence from the trap and placed it in the pond".

Janet

Janet - I believe it's in this post of Kermits.

http://scaredmonkeys.net/index.php?topic=4269.msg604296#msg604296

Quote
Remember Hotshot (Kathy Drenga) just recently told the monkeys that it was HER who directed Caps (and the witness) to Silvetti.
 
Could this REALLY be the first sign to prove the suspicions that Silvetti gave something from that trap to be put in the pond?  Shoe?  Skull? - speculation.



Thank you Klaas.

Kermit made it very clear that he/she was speculating ... like every Monkey on this forum has done since the getgo.

Janet


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #788 12/31/08 -
Post by: Keepthefaith on December 31, 2008, 06:29:13 PM
Idstlou
Scared Monkey
*
Offline Offline
Posts: 4866
View Profile
   
   
Re: Natalee Case Discussion #788 12/31/08 -
« Reply #181 on: Today at 02:31:22 PM »

wingnut, see this is what irks me...you tell half truths for your own agenda. He was gone for 2 months because he was on a ship in Egypt for crying out loud...why make it out to be anything more than it was?
http://scaredmonkeys.net/index.php?topic=4328.180


John Silvetti was the project manager for the Egypt project that Kyle was sent on.
You know, that little company of his that merged with  ::MonkeyShocked:: THE DUTCH!

Kyle: “I did not feel the same and we had a major difference in opinion. He [John Silvetti] was the one who never pressed ALE to be completely open with us with the trap evidence. I would have forced them to. However, John was the one paying my invoices so I was forced to sit back and hope for the best.”


Will this make it easier for Silvetti to do business out of Aruba??


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #788 12/31/08 -
Post by: Kermit on December 31, 2008, 06:29:47 PM
Kyle: I've talked with Peter Shouten numerous times back in February. He hasn't seen anything but knows about the blue fabrics. DeVries and Endemol was interested in purchasing the ROV footage and I was working between them, ABC, and CBS to strike a deal.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #788 12/31/08 -
Post by: bleachedblack on December 31, 2008, 06:30:55 PM
Bleachedblack - you mean like Patrick van der Eem?

Not who I would guess.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #788 12/31/08 -
Post by: Keepthefaith on December 31, 2008, 06:32:37 PM
Idstlou
Scared Monkey
*
Offline Offline
Posts: 4866
View Profile
   
   
Re: Natalee Case Discussion #788 12/31/08 -
« Reply #181 on: Today at 02:31:22 PM »

wingnut, see this is what irks me...you tell half truths for your own agenda. He was gone for 2 months because he was on a ship in Egypt for crying out loud...why make it out to be anything more than it was?
http://scaredmonkeys.net/index.php?topic=4328.180


John Silvetti was the project manager for the Egypt project that Kyle was sent on.
You know, that little company of his that merged with  ::MonkeyShocked:: THE DUTCH!

Kyle: “I did not feel the same and we had a major difference in opinion. He [John Silvetti] was the one who never pressed ALE to be completely open with us with the trap evidence. I would have forced them to. However, John was the one paying my invoices so I was forced to sit back and hope for the best.”


Will this make it easier for Silvetti to do business out of Aruba??

Also.From The research you've all done Kermit,Jen,wingnut do we know who owns the company Silvetti merged with??TIA


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #788 12/31/08 -
Post by: Kermit on December 31, 2008, 06:33:06 PM
Kyle: I have not given anything to the FBI since the pictures and statements from Dec 29th

Kyle: John told me then he didn't want to hear me ever mention the trap again.


Kyle: He's [John Silvetti] seriously making plans to open an Aruba office so he can conduct business easier in S. America and that would allow him to do that.

Klye: We're being fed misinformation to keep us searching and out of their way while they cover their asses, destroy evidence, cover their tracks, and keep us out at sea and away from the trap.



Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #788 12/31/08 -
Post by: klaasend on December 31, 2008, 06:33:07 PM
Bleachedblack - you mean like Patrick van der Eem?

Not who I would guess.

Who would you guess?


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #788 12/31/08 -
Post by: San on December 31, 2008, 06:33:59 PM

Thanks for all the support guys!  Not only for today, but also for the last 2.5 years.  None of you had to do this - and that you chose to...................well, it means the world to me!!
You are all fantastic people - with hearts of gold, that my faith and trust will forever be with!


We had to stand up for Kermit.

When a friends integrity is attacked and I know that friend only tells the truth that is when I speak up because it is the right thing to do.

I stand with the frog.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #788 12/31/08 -
Post by: Magnolia on December 31, 2008, 06:34:29 PM
I just don't understand why people like Mum and Lalas & idstlou and
all of the former posters here are so angry.
Anybody who reads all of this information should see the
truth to it.  They are nitpicking at the least little word.

Why are they so mad about it all?


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #788 12/31/08 -
Post by: Keepthefaith on December 31, 2008, 06:35:55 PM
I just don't understand why people like Mum and Lalas & idstlou and
all of the former posters here are so angry.
Anybody who reads all of this information should see the
truth to it.  They are nitpicking at the least little word.

Why are they so mad about it all?

That's a great question Magnolia!Mum accused me of stirring the pot??Go figure huh...


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #788 12/31/08 -
Post by: Kermit on December 31, 2008, 06:37:31 PM
IT APPEARS JOHN SILVETTI HAS A SECOND COMPANY ORIGINALLY KNOWN AS GEOLAB SILVETTI AND COMPANY LLC, BUT HE CHANGED THE NAME TO GEOLAB LLC IN 2001
(NOTE THIS COMPANY HAS THE SAME ADDRESS AS APS ABOVE) GEOLAB SILVETTI CO. 401 MECCA ST # B (337)-291-1120
http://www.looboo.com/list/US/LA/Lafayette/localinks

THIS SECOND COMPANY REPRESENTS THE INTEGRATED CAPABILITIES OF 5 GEOLAB COMPANIES
** NOTE THAT 1 OF THE 5 IS IN THE NETHERLANDS

will head up the Groups America's region following a reorganization in Q4, 2001. GeoLab will change the operational name from GeoLab Silvetti and Company LLC to GeoLab LLC forthwith with the corporate office in Houston, Texas and an operational base in Lafayette, Louisianasnip

The Group represents the integrated capabilities of five GeoLab Companies; GeoLab Technical Services Ltd. (UK), GeoLab srl. (Italy), GeoLab bv (Netherlands), GeoLab LLC (USA) and GeoLab Technical Services Nigeria Ltd. (Nigeria).

http://www.e-pageads.com/surveymarketplace/newsletter/newsletter71.html#2


The GeoLab group of companies operates through a network of strategically located companies to provide its customers with a global service. Experienced field proven professionals, whom in turn service the needs of their local customers, manage each entity. The Group represents the integrated capabilities of five GeoLab Companies; GeoLab Technical Services Ltd. (UK), GeoLab srl. (Italy), GeoLab bv (Netherlands), GeoLab LLC (USA) and GeoLab Technical Services Nigeria Ltd. (Nigeria).


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #788 12/31/08 -
Post by: San on December 31, 2008, 06:38:05 PM
Quote
Hotshot wrote:

---------------------------------------------------------------------
Destiny and ******* started up their own private forum.  (Assumption WRONG)!
--------------------------------------------------------------------

Actually Mrskub started the forum in November and Destiny and ******* are moderators.  Going to say that's wrong too? 

And yes, I happen to know you,Capslock, Lala's, Yaps are members there as well and Johan and many others.
yes that is correct.  And  there are many others...  Not a big deal.

It is a big deal in the respect that Destiny and ******* are spreading lies about ME.  Other than that no.  It does make me wonder about people who choose to be a member of a forum where the moderators are known to lie.  But if that's your choice so be it.  ::MonkeyRoll::

It is a major and I mean major deal to me when people start spreading lies about you.  That is when I know there is something wrong with that person.  I already knew about ******* and his temper.  He has issues.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #788 12/31/08 -
Post by: jen3560 on December 31, 2008, 06:38:31 PM
Idstlou
Scared Monkey
*
Offline Offline
Posts: 4866
View Profile
   
   
Re: Natalee Case Discussion #788 12/31/08 -
« Reply #181 on: Today at 02:31:22 PM »

wingnut, see this is what irks me...you tell half truths for your own agenda. He was gone for 2 months because he was on a ship in Egypt for crying out loud...why make it out to be anything more than it was?
http://scaredmonkeys.net/index.php?topic=4328.180


John Silvetti was the project manager for the Egypt project that Kyle was sent on.
You know, that little company of his that merged with  ::MonkeyShocked:: THE DUTCH!

Kyle: “I did not feel the same and we had a major difference in opinion. He [John Silvetti] was the one who never pressed ALE to be completely open with us with the trap evidence. I would have forced them to. However, John was the one paying my invoices so I was forced to sit back and hope for the best.”


Will this make it easier for Silvetti to do business out of Aruba??

Also.From The research you've all done Kermit,Jen,wingnut do we know who owns the company Silvetti merged with??TIA

Silvetti himself does........now.  IIRC, it's part of his GeoLab companies.............I think there are 5 worldwide?  One is Dutch.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #788 12/31/08 -
Post by: Tamikosmom on December 31, 2008, 06:39:56 PM
Hi Mum!I'll be awaiting your post regarding me stirring the pot and what my reasoning is for?? ::MonkeyDance:: ::MonkeyDance:: ::MonkeyDance::

Keepthefaith

Have you been baaaad ... veeeery veeeery baaaad?

 ::MonkeyHaHa::

Youngest son and Dutch American wife are attending a family union in Seattle tomorrow ... you nic of the woods.  If the noise gets too loud ... please don't call the police.  Just drop in.  Those Dutch relatives know how to party without a drop of alcohol and ... they are very welcomingl.

Happy New Year

Janet



Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #788 12/31/08 -
Post by: jen3560 on December 31, 2008, 06:40:19 PM
I just don't understand why people like Mum and Lalas & idstlou and
all of the former posters here are so angry.
Anybody who reads all of this information should see the
truth to it.  They are nitpicking at the least little word.

Why are they so mad about it all?

I'll one up you with a question here.........

why are some at that site saying that JUG knew the MAIN goal of the Persistence for that trip was oil related?


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #788 12/31/08 -
Post by: klaasend on December 31, 2008, 06:42:07 PM
I just don't understand why people like Mum and Lalas & idstlou and
all of the former posters here are so angry.
Anybody who reads all of this information should see the
truth to it.  They are nitpicking at the least little word.

Why are they so mad about it all?

I'm not sure.

I try not to blindly believe anyone or anything. I'm not perfect and throughout this case I have been conned and I've been wrong about people.  That's exactly why I research for myself. 

That said from my research Capslock does live in Aruba.  Was Capslock sent to distract?  That I don't know. 

Kyle has had an attitude from the very beginning of his involvement with the Persistence search.  From all the information we have been provided by Kermit and verified by at least 5 other people, it appears that Kyle has obstructed justice and so has John Silvetti.

I have no choice but to "stand with the frog" on this.  Prove me and the frog wrong.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #788 12/31/08 -
Post by: jen3560 on December 31, 2008, 06:44:55 PM
I just don't understand why people like Mum and Lalas & idstlou and
all of the former posters here are so angry.
Anybody who reads all of this information should see the
truth to it.  They are nitpicking at the least little word.

Why are they so mad about it all?

I'm not sure.

I try not to blindly believe anyone or anything. I'm not perfect and throughout this case I have been conned and I've been wrong about people.  That's exactly why I research for myself. 

That said from my research Capslock does live in Aruba.  Was Capslock sent to distract?  That I don't know. 

Kyle has had an attitude from the very beginning of his involvement with the Persistence search.  From all the information we have been provided by Kermit and verified by at least 5 other people, it appears that Kyle has obstructed justice and so has John Silvetti.

I have no choice but to "stand with the frog" on this.  Prove me and the frog wrong.

klaas - I think I may have had an epiphany that could explain why caps was logged in here, and no one from Aruba was showing as here.

And this was before he had his hidey IP software, because he showed up here from Aruba after that.

I was unaware of the times Blonde was referring to, when Kermit began posting the things he did here.

I had been speaking of earlier this year, when we noticed it.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #788 12/31/08 -
Post by: Keepthefaith on December 31, 2008, 06:45:17 PM
Hi Mum!I'll be awaiting your post regarding me stirring the pot and what my reasoning is for?? ::MonkeyDance:: ::MonkeyDance:: ::MonkeyDance::

Keepthefaith

Have you been baaaad ... veeeery veeeery baaaad?

 ::MonkeyHaHa::

Youngest son and Dutch American wife are attending a family union in Seattle tomorrow ... you nic of the woods.  If the noise gets too loud ... please don't call the police.  Just drop in.  Those Dutch relatives know how to party without a drop of alcohol and ... they are very welcomingl.

Happy New Year

Janet



 ::MonkeyLaugh:: Couldn't tell ya.For some reason it coordinates with Nov 18th.Something must have happened on that date but i'm unaware of what!Maybe Joran in thailand?I don't know??Just a Monkey from Seattle that would like to see JUSTICE FOR NATALEE SERVED...If that's stirrin the pot i got both hands on the spoon!  ::MonkeyDance::

Hope all is well in the Fraser Valley?Gonna stay in and safe down in Washington..


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #788 12/31/08 -
Post by: wingnut on December 31, 2008, 06:46:09 PM
Kyle: I have not given anything to the FBI since the pictures and statements from Dec 29th

In his own words, proof that the images from the recovery on January 7th were NOT given to the FBI.


 
Kyle: I've talked with Peter Shouten numerous times back in February. He hasn't seen anything but knows about the blue fabrics. DeVries and Endemol was interested in purchasing the ROV footage and I was working between them, ABC, and CBS to strike a deal.

However, in February he was trying to sell them. 

 ::MonkeyNoNo::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #788 12/31/08 -
Post by: Kermit on December 31, 2008, 06:48:09 PM
we know Kyle is working for StatoilHydro, AGR Drilling, Fugro Norway

Ormen Lange Excavation - North SeaOrmen Lange deep sea pipeline excavation monitoring with Oceaneering Magnum ROV and high-resolution multibeam sonar. StatoilHydro, AGR Drilling, Fugro Norway
Posted by Kyle Kingman at 4:43 PMhttp://geosolutions.blogspot.com/2008/07/ormen-lange-excavation-north-sea-norway.html

HIS FIRST STOP WHEN HE GOT TO OSLO WAS AT FUGRO NORWAY

I got off at Skoeyen (Skøyen) station, on the outskirts of Oslo, where I met up with Knut. He took me across the street from the train station to Fugro Norway headquarters

FUGRO IS IN AMSTERDAM - A DUTCH COMPANY
another Dutch connection.

FUGRO HAD DONE ALL THE MAPPING OF THE OCEAN FLOOR SO THAT HYDRO COULD DECIDE WHAT ROUTE TO TAKE THE PIPELINE

Fugro Survey has mapped 5000km of pipeline route alternatives from Norway's Ormen Lange field to shore under a frame agreement contract with Norsk Hydro. The surveys, off the west coast of Norway between Aalesund and Kristiansund, were over 10 likely routes in difficult topographic areas through many islands and shallow areas.

Fugro's survey vessel Geo Scanner used a Simrad EM1002 precision multibeam echo sounder to achieve optimum depth accuracy. A five-person onboard team processed and interpreted survey results and transmitted these ashore to enable Norsk Hydro to make key routing decisions as the surveys progressed. For more information, E-mail Phil Meaden, Fugro Survey Ltd, Aberdeen at pmeaden@fugrosurvey.co.uk
http://www.e-pageads.com/survey-marketplace/newsletter/newsletter20.html


ALTHOUGH HE HAD HAD JUST HAD A PHYSICAL THAT QUALIFIED HIM FOR WORKING IN THE THE NORTH SEA, HE NOW HAD TO GET ONE THAT QUALIFIED HIM FOR WORKING IN THE NORWEGIAN SECTION

Once there, I set my bags down and caught a taxi to the Reiseklinikken, where I met Dr. Hasle. Even though I just got a UKOOA physical that qualified me for the North Sea, I needed an addition to the physical that qualified me for the Norwegian sector of the North Sea
HE THEN FLEW TO KRISTIANSUND AND MET UP WITH THE SHIP THE ISLAND VALIANT
We boarded a small twin turbo-prop plane and flew a little over an hour north from Oslo to a town called Kristiansund
The boat is called the Island Valiant. It's a 296 ft (90.4m) long support vessel built in 2007

THE ISLAND VALIANT HAD BEEN CONTRACTED BY AGR SUBSEA TO CARRY OUT THE DEEP WATER EXCAVATION WORK
November 5, 2007

Seabrokers reports that Island Offshore's UT 787LCD Island Valiant has been contracted by AGR Subsea AS to carry out deep water excavation work on the Ormen Lange Southern Field Development Project in June next year.

KYLE'S ROLE INVOLVED DOING THE TWO WEAKEST OPERATIONAL AREAS HE HAS, WHICH THE CLIENT WAS WELL AWARE OF BEFORE THE JOB. HE IS USED TO BE VERY COMFORTABLE IN THE WORK HE DOES, HAVING A HIGH COMMAND OF EXPERTISE. BUT HERE HE'S COMPLETELY OUT OF HIS COMFORT ZONE AND OUT OF HIS EXPERTISE

My role is to take the pre installation data and calculate how much volume of material is to be removed and from where it should be removed, then once trenched, calculate how much material was removed so the installation can be conducted and evaluate the route This role involves large amounts of multi-beam sonar processing and AutoCAD work. This is the two weakest operational areas I have, which the client was well aware of before the job. However, within the first few days I got up to speed of where I needed to be and things are starting to get under control, but the pressure is certainly on. This project is stretching me, but I'm learning a lot.
I am used to being very comfortable in the work I do, having a high command over my expertise. Here, I am completely out of my comfort zone and out of my expertise.


ONE NIGHT A LOW-PROFILE WORK VESSEL WAS OPERATING WITHIN A MILE OF THEM, AND THE OFFSHORE PROJECT MANAGER, JOHN HAD TOLD HIM THERE RECENTLY 18 PEOPLE HAD DROWNED WHEN THE SAME BOAT SANK

Last night, a long low-profile work vessel was operating within a mile of our vessel.
The offshore project manager, John  told me that recently 18 people drowned on that same boat when it sank

AFTER FINISHING THE JOB, HE FLEW TO OSLO TO THE CLIENTS MAIN OFFICE

This Tuesday morning we completed the job in the North Sea and were headed for Ulsteinvik, Norway for demobilization. The client was ecstaticAfter flying to Oslo, I checked into the Thon Hotel, which is located near the city center and King’s palace, a popular tourist hotspot.I took the train to the client’s main office where I was greeted by several bosses who gathered together and looked at me, a “geo”, as if I were a lone unicornfew rows made office is located in Oslo Norway
FUGRO NORWAY MAIN OFFICE IS LOCATED IN OSLO

AFTER A BRIEF MEETING, A DUTCH AGENT NAMED MARK TOBE TELLS HIM HE IS IMMEDIATELY NEEDED IN CAIRO, AND THAT HIS FLIGHT LEAVES IN FIVE HOURS SHOULD HE ACCEPT


After a brief productive meeting Knut walks in and hands me a phone. It’s a Dutch agent named Mark Tobe. He tells me I’m needed immediately in Cairo and that a driver will be waiting for me when I land. My flight leaves in 5 hours, should I accepthe arrives in Cairo to do a job that he doesn't know who the client is, what the job is, or even if he will be staying in each up to all the nose is they were not afraid to pay him a high price to get him there

HE ARRIVES IN CAIRO TO DO A JOB THAT HE DOESN'T KNOW WHO THE CLIENT IS, WHAT THE JOB IS, OR EVEN IF HE WILL STAY IN EGYPT. ALL HE KNOWS IS THAT THEY WERE NOT AFRAID TO PAY HIM A HIGH PRICE TO GET HIM THERE.

I was contacted about 12 hours earlier in Norway by a Dutch agent who needed me in Cairo ASAP and they were not afraid to pay a high price to get me here. All I know is there was to be a driver waiting for me. I don’t know who the client is, what the job is, what I’m doing in Egypt, or if I will even be staying in Egypt. Hmm… how do I fill out my customs card?

HE SAYS HE IS WORKING ON A SHIP WHICH IS AN EX-RUSSIAN KGB SPY VESSEL CALLED THE NAVIGATOR



Now, add the crew of an ex-Russian KGB spy vessel named the “Navigator” to the list who once during a routine expedition came across an ancient submerged pyramid in the Mediterranean

WHICH APPEARS TO BE THE FUGRO NAVIGATOR
IT IS REGISTERED TO FUGRO CHINA, BUT IT LOOKS LIKE YOU MUST GO THROUGH THE NETHERLANDS BRANCH TO USE IT


Address : Wanchai, China
с/о Fugro Marine Services B.V.: Dillenburgsingel 69, P.O. Box 136, 2260 AC Leidschendam, Netherlands

Moored/Anchored. FUGRO NAVIGATOR, Cargo, Moored/Anchored, 0, 146, ABU QIR, 5/31/2008 9:00:00 AM, 08/06/2008 00:10 · Χάρτης ...

syros-*******.aegean.gr/ais/datasheet.aspx?datasource=SHIPS_ CURRENT&alpha=F&language=_GR&ord...



FUGRO SAE WERE LOOKING TO HIRE PEOPLE TO WORK ON THAT SHIP


FSAE are seeking to employ a two Hydrographic Survey Party Chiefs to manage our Geophysical Survey Vessel “Fugro Navigator”. The position is mainly vessel-based working back to back with opposite number either project by project or by rotation although office based pre project and project reporting work will be required. The Party Chief is the Company representative in the field and is responsible for ensuring that the project is completed in accordance with the procedures and Client specifications and within the confines of the contract. The Party Chief is also responsible for ensuring that the results are presented in a professional, timely, and efficient manner
http://www.fugro.be/jobs/jobdetails.asp?item=1183


HE WAS APPARENTLY THERE ANALIZING WORK THAT HAD ALREADY BEEN DONEAND APPEARS TO BE LOOKING FOR OBSTACLES ON THE OCEAN FLOOR

Hardly a few minutes into the analysis of hundreds of miles of sonar data, a rather unassuming wispy tendril of backscatter drew my attention. It wasn’t real, but rather an out of range return from something subtle lying just beyond the sonar’s range drawing me on to look furtherThinking I might find another wreck, I chased the subtle wisp of acoustic return and headed east on an adjacent discarded sonar lineThen, barely visible above the mud-line, the unassuming skeletal wooden frame of a large potentially-ancient wreck came into view I found an undiscovered shipwreck the day before In 60m of water, out of nowhere juts a perfectly geometric dome. Located immediately by its side, is a smaller second mound about 1/10th the size. The proportion of their sizes is perfect. The sides of the mounds are perfectly flat and uniform, like the sides of a pyramid.These two structures have an identical alignment as the great pyramids when adjusted for the difference in precessional variation through time


I’ve been in Cairo now for sixteen days and I’ve fallen into a steady rhythm of work, sleep, and repetition. The project’s back is broken and the end is in sight

We’ve come across a 160ft high submerged structure in over 200ft of water. If man-made, it would support intelligent antediluvian Neolithic civilization existed and thrived for potentially thousands of years before popular academic opinion would suggestIf it is a positive side, the structure will be left untouched

Although the effort will be viewed by most as successful, I will look back at it as partially repugnant and he moves on to another project in egypt
Once this project is completed, I will move on to a new one currently mobilizing near El Alamein, west of Alexandria, Egypt


#157 on: March 01, 2008, 10:52:05 PM observerQuote from: LegallyLex on March 01, 2008, 07:08:11 PM

Please do not take this as defeat. Please continue to try and raise the funds so that another boat with an ROV can come in and look at those targets. As of this date and time, it just cannot be the Persistence. And trust me when I say the Persistence and crew definitely wanted to be the ones to bring Natalee home to her family.
http://scaredmonkeys.net/index.php?topic=2438.140

#13 on: July 11, 2008, 02:18:24 PM Destiny

Another tid-bit from Margaret W...when I brought up the Persistence...she said that she recieved no info about them leaving...nor any info regarding their investigation....whey she inquired as to what was going on the OM told her that the persistence was done...had left...and was *not* coming back...she would like some info proving otherwise...
Destiny
http://scaredmonkeys.net/index.php?topic=3045.msg398199#msg398199



THERE APPEARS TO BE AT LEAST 4 PROJECTS GEOLAB AND FUGRO HAD WORKED ON IN COMMON
Fugro Houston office

http://www.geolab.it/geolab_eng/geoLay_progetti.html
----------------------------------------------------------------------

HE HAS WORKED FOR FUGRO MIDEAST BEFORE

QA/QC Geophysical Engineer for project Falcon-2, Fugro Survey (Middle East) Alcatel and Flag telecoms. FO Submarine telecommunication network route survey, assessment, and reporting; cable route from Arabian Sea, to Muscat, Dubai, Abu Dhabi, Doha, Manama, Kuwait and other landings.







Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #788 12/31/08 -
Post by: Magnolia on December 31, 2008, 06:49:32 PM
I just don't understand why people like Mum and Lalas & idstlou and
all of the former posters here are so angry.
Anybody who reads all of this information should see the
truth to it.  They are nitpicking at the least little word.

Why are they so mad about it all?

I'll one up you with a question here.........

why are some at that site saying that JUG knew the MAIN goal of the Persistence for that trip was oil related?

WOW!  Poor Natalee.   Dave is sharing information with Mark Purcell
and Jug knew the Persistence search was oil related.  What's next?


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #788 12/31/08 -
Post by: Kermit on December 31, 2008, 06:49:53 PM

Thanks for all the support guys!  Not only for today, but also for the last 2.5 years.  None of you had to do this - and that you chose to...................well, it means the world to me!!
You are all fantastic people - with hearts of gold, that my faith and trust will forever be with!


We had to stand up for Kermit.

When a friends integrity is attacked and I know that friend only tells the truth that is when I speak up because it is the right thing to do.

I stand with the frog.

Thank you San.
You make me smile.
Not just because of what you just said, but because of your integrity and fearlessness.




Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #788 12/31/08 -
Post by: Kermit on December 31, 2008, 06:51:19 PM
I just don't understand why people like Mum and Lalas & idstlou and
all of the former posters here are so angry.
Anybody who reads all of this information should see the
truth to it.  They are nitpicking at the least little word.

Why are they so mad about it all?

That's a great question Magnolia!Mum accused me of stirring the pot??Go figure huh...

Don't feel bad she accused me too of purposely not answering her posts since some date she had.
None of which was true.

Hope she can return and realize the mistake she made, so all can be forgiven.




Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #788 12/31/08 -
Post by: Kermit on December 31, 2008, 06:52:53 PM
Hi Mum!I'll be awaiting your post regarding me stirring the pot and what my reasoning is for?? ::MonkeyDance:: ::MonkeyDance:: ::MonkeyDance::

Keepthefaith

Have you been baaaad ... veeeery veeeery baaaad?

 ::MonkeyHaHa::

Youngest son and Dutch American wife are attending a family union in Seattle tomorrow ... you nic of the woods.  If the noise gets too loud ... please don't call the police.  Just drop in.  Those Dutch relatives know how to party without a drop of alcohol and ... they are very welcomingl.

Happy New Year

Janet



Janet, you and veggie have a blast and party down!
Happy New Year to you and your family, may they all be blessed.



Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #788 12/31/08 -
Post by: Magnolia on December 31, 2008, 06:53:13 PM
I just don't understand why people like Mum and Lalas & idstlou and
all of the former posters here are so angry.
Anybody who reads all of this information should see the
truth to it.  They are nitpicking at the least little word.

Why are they so mad about it all?

I'm not sure.

I try not to blindly believe anyone or anything. I'm not perfect and throughout this case I have been conned and I've been wrong about people.  That's exactly why I research for myself. 

That said from my research Capslock does live in Aruba.  Was Capslock sent to distract?  That I don't know. 

Kyle has had an attitude from the very beginning of his involvement with the Persistence search.  From all the information we have been provided by Kermit and verified by at least 5 other people, it appears that Kyle has obstructed justice and so has John Silvetti.

I have no choice but to "stand with the frog" on this.  Prove me and the frog wrong.

Klaas, I am so proud to hear you say you stand with the frog. ::MonkeyDance::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #788 12/31/08 -
Post by: Rob on December 31, 2008, 06:54:46 PM

klaasend
Administrator
Monkey All Star
*
Online Online
Posts: 45530
View Profile WWW   
Re: Natalee Case Discussion #788 12/31/08 -
« Reply #43 on: Today at 12:17:40 PM »

Klassend is correct in that Dave has Mark Purcell checking out what Caps tells Dave.








And that, in and of itself, is horribly, horribly frightening!

Questions were posted back in February I think.  Who was the "leak".  IMO the leak is coming direct from Dave Holloway via Robin and Mark Purcell.  Sorry to say but that's how I feel.

the leak is coming via Kath and Caps to Dave to Mark. Case closed. Mark to ALE. ALE to Silvetti. Silvetti to Jossy.

what a tangled mess.

Janet said it best - the chance was most likely lost forever.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #788 12/31/08 -
Post by: Kermit on December 31, 2008, 06:54:46 PM
I just don't understand why people like Mum and Lalas & idstlou and
all of the former posters here are so angry.
Anybody who reads all of this information should see the
truth to it.  They are nitpicking at the least little word.

Why are they so mad about it all?

I'm not sure.

I try not to blindly believe anyone or anything. I'm not perfect and throughout this case I have been conned and I've been wrong about people.  That's exactly why I research for myself. 

That said from my research Capslock does live in Aruba.  Was Capslock sent to distract?  That I don't know. 

Kyle has had an attitude from the very beginning of his involvement with the Persistence search.  From all the information we have been provided by Kermit and verified by at least 5 other people, it appears that Kyle has obstructed justice and so has John Silvetti.

I have no choice but to "stand with the frog" on this.  Prove me and the frog wrong.

well you know I live next door to you.
ROFLMAO!

All that dust you was a make'n too rearranging the foundation!

When I read that last night I really laughed.



Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #788 12/31/08 -
Post by: Kermit on December 31, 2008, 06:56:16 PM
Caps uses several computers guys.

just a fyi



Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #788 12/31/08 -
Post by: wreck on December 31, 2008, 06:56:30 PM
Well, I'll tell ya -- I was completely bamboozled by Kyle. I have always thought the whole cage affair was hinky. In fact, I was so sure we weren't being told the truth (and that it was very obvious) that I thought we were being mis-lead by the family ON PURPOSE. I thought it was an agreement by the them and the FBI to try and ferrite out the perps. I was fine with that. Now it is clear the FBI and Family DID NOT KNOW EVERYTHING that transpired on Persistence. I'm livid.

 ::MonkeyNoNo::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #788 12/31/08 -
Post by: Tamikosmom on December 31, 2008, 06:56:45 PM
Kyle: I have not given anything to the FBI since the pictures and statements from Dec 29th

In his own words, proof that the images from the recovery on January 7th were NOT given to the FBI.


 
Kyle: I've talked with Peter Shouten numerous times back in February. He hasn't seen anything but knows about the blue fabrics. DeVries and Endemol was interested in purchasing the ROV footage and I was working between them, ABC, and CBS to strike a deal.

However, in February he was trying to sell them. 

 ::MonkeyNoNo::


Wingnut

Kyle Kingman's own words at both the Natalee's Freebird's site and the Scared Monkey's site expose John S.'s betrayal of Natalee Holloway, her family and those who sacrificially donated to the the Persistance undertaking.

Considering that Kyle failed to immediately notify the FBI and family when he set foot on American soil regarding the second set of ROV images and .his concerns encompassing the John S/ALE connection ... it can only be assumed that somewhere along the way he had a change of heart and became a participant in the finale to the great Aruban coverup.

Happy New Year.

Janet


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #788 12/31/08 -
Post by: bleachedblack on December 31, 2008, 06:57:30 PM
Bleachedblack - you mean like Patrick van der Eem?

Not who I would guess.

Who would you guess?

I had a publishing co in mind, maybe Sijthoff ?


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #788 12/31/08 -
Post by: jen3560 on December 31, 2008, 06:59:48 PM
I just don't understand why people like Mum and Lalas & idstlou and
all of the former posters here are so angry.
Anybody who reads all of this information should see the
truth to it.  They are nitpicking at the least little word.

Why are they so mad about it all?

I'm not sure.

I try not to blindly believe anyone or anything. I'm not perfect and throughout this case I have been conned and I've been wrong about people.  That's exactly why I research for myself. 

That said from my research Capslock does live in Aruba.  Was Capslock sent to distract?  That I don't know. 

Kyle has had an attitude from the very beginning of his involvement with the Persistence search.  From all the information we have been provided by Kermit and verified by at least 5 other people, it appears that Kyle has obstructed justice and so has John Silvetti.

I have no choice but to "stand with the frog" on this.  Prove me and the frog wrong.

klaas - I think I may have had an epiphany that could explain why caps was logged in here, and no one from Aruba was showing as here.

And this was before he had his hidey IP software, because he showed up here from Aruba after that.

I was unaware of the times Blonde was referring to, when Kermit began posting the things he did here.

I had been speaking of earlier this year, when we noticed it.

In researching my notes - it was sometime in September that this was happening with Caps.  He would be signed on, but no one showed from Aruba.  This was every single time he was logged in, for nearly a week.

Klaas - I know you said we can't necessarily go by what the site meter shows and what it doesn't, I understand that perfectly well due to the site meter at the freebird blog.

For that reason, this place was watched VERY carefully............see - we were having doubts about who Caps was claiming to be.

I trust that you know he posted from Aruba.

And we had "seen" him in Aruba before and after this particular week, whenever he was signed in.

Does anyone know the exact date(s) this "witness" came to the States to take the polygraph tests?


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #788 12/31/08 -
Post by: klaasend on December 31, 2008, 07:00:38 PM
Caps first post on the front page of SM from an Aruban IP:

Quote
CapslockWizard wrote:
ok, I have read all your comments and I was wondering…. If the boddy can not be found is because it is put where nobody should look for…

Wel the only answer that I can come up with is a cemetary among all the other deads in Aruba… but the question is which one.

I aruba when someone day they do not usually put their dead in the ground but in something called a Kelder… A Kelder is like a small place made form stone where the families will burried their loveones. Most of them are sealed but you can find one that is open and put a body in one and seal it with only 5 cement block and a coat of paint and no one will ever look there. becuase it is the cemetary.

So Nathally must be in a cemetary and thats why it can not be found and thats my logic.

Dec 20, 11:08 PM
A post a few days later from a different Aruban IP:

Quote
Capslockwizard wrote:

This is my analysis about the disappearing and the events on that day. There are two possible scenarios that will fit a logic question.
The Logic question is “Where would I hide a body so that nobody will find it and at the same time lose my shoes?”

Tools I have used are:

1. Goolge Earth with Aruba MAP and area location to pin possible scenarios.
2. Time Line Event of the case.
3. My logic and Strategic thinking on solving problems.
4. Ttime line from the website http://members.aol.com/worldJOURNIER/NATALEE/NATALEEtimeline.html
I believe there is a fundamental flaw the way the authorities see the case.
If the Investigators cannot find Nathalie is because they are searching and looking in the wrong places or they must know but would not come forward.
If you ask yourself this question: “Where would I hide a body so that nobody will find it and at the same time lose my shoes?”
The answers are a lot of places can be used, but for a logic thinker there is only one answer.
And form all the articles that I have read, nobody have suggested and even mention this place.
TEST LOGIG SENARIO 1:
In Aruba in when someone dies, they can be put to rest in two ways.

1. In the grounds. But this procedure has stop due to not enough cemetery.

2. In a Kelder. A Kelder is a place above ground with 4 or 6 rooms constructed out of brick and mortar inside a Cemetery. These Kelders belong to a Family and they buy these plots form the church in the cemetery and build the Kelders on it and leave it open for when the moment arrived you have a place to rest.

Both types of method funerals will take place only in a CEMETARY.

There are several (7) CEMETARY in Aruba and most of them have KELDERS and a lot are left OPEN for when he or she dies will be buried close in the Family plot. From those seven, three is close from my analysis and from those 3, the one in Noord is to visible and no high walls. The one in Ponton/ Oranjestad is in public site from the front but from the back it has possibilities. The one in Paradera has most likely and it has a wall but anybody with a pickup or can climb easy over the wall second it is no visible from public site.

The reason that no one can find her is that she must be among all the dead in the cemetery and who is going to search a cemetery for a body where there is already a lot of body in the place.
You will never find an open grave in the ground because when someone dies in Aruba and need to be buried in the ground, the Funeral home in charge of the body will give orders to dig a grave for this person in a district in accordance with the family wishes.

To dig a grave 6 feet deep and wide enough for a body will take a lot of time by hand. Beside the ground will look disturb by the cemetery keeper. So I believe that these 4 perps would not have the time to dig a grave.

But

If you have a dead body on your hand and you need to hide it fast, the only way is to put it in an open Kelder and with only five to 6 bricks and and a bucket of cement and you are done. And if you want to make it look professional, can even give it a coat of paint color white which is the mostly use.

This last process is very easy done with 3 or 4 person.

a. Move dead body to a cemetery,

b. Cemetery door closed, then jump the fence with the body.

c. Inside the cemetery look for an open Kelder or break one open.

d. Put body in it

e. Go and get 6 pieces of bricks or use bricks that are in the cemetery already.

f. Make cement in a bucket

g. Use the bricks to close the small walls of the Kelder.

h. Paint the wall

And you are done.

The flaws with this logic are that it do not account for a missing shoe.
And so this cannot be complete true and do not compute. But possible

TEST LOGIG SENARIO 2:

1. Normaly if one want to have sex in Aruba that comes from the clubs go to a place call WHITEHOUSE and not the LIGHTHOUSE and they sound almost identical (Here I think ether the Investigator hear it wrong and JoraN and K2 continue with the kakamenia storie about the LightHouse or it was plan-out between them.) The Whitehouse is an apartment Complex where one drive in with the car into an Apartment with automatic garage doors attached. One in the garage you are also in the apartment. These apartments are for some to go and have sex in and one pay 50.00 for a couple of hours use. If foul play was committed in one of these rooms or if she was overdosed in one of these rooms, nobody will see or hear. Add checkout time you just hop in your car in the garage and drive out to the gate and no one will notice anything as she could be asleep in the back seat. Now you have a dead body that you have to get rid of in your car… you could not bring a dead body to a hotel… you have to get rid of it…and here is my view of what next move will be.

2. The next move is to look for a place to dump the body and here is where the missing shoes come to play and also the story that they were driving around statement comes to play a role). It is dark, almost 3:00 am and in Aruba there are several murky water reservoirs that can be used to dump the body (see Google Earth – Aruba) in it and she would be gone. But the question is which one? Well looking at the map you can see that from the Whitehouse Building there several c that can be used and there is one behind the Whitehouse building. Once first instinct is to dump the body there since it is closely when you exit the Whitehouse building. Now here is where it gets interesting depending how many people you have to help you carry the body to the murky pool. And not knowing that the closer you get to one of these murky pools, your feet will sink into this thick mud and when you try to pull your feet out, it will not come out because the mud has a suction that seals around the plastic of the sneakers and the only way out is to pull your feet out of the sneakers and leave the sneakers behind.
Also when you are in a hurry to get rid of the body you will not think to go get your sneakers and it is dark in that area. And I believe that that’s why Joram was without a sneaker. Now there is still a question not answer, Was Joran alone or did he got help? Knowing what we know from all that has been written about the case and blog out there. We know that the Kalpoes came to help. I do believe that Joran is stronger and weight more and that he Dump the body in one of these reservoirs and that’s why he lost his shoes. Now Joran is bear feet walking? From where was he coming from?. One thing is sure he was going to papa and mama. But what happened to the helpers? Why they did not drive Joran home. Or was it that Joran acted alone and called the Kalpoes after all what has happened to him.

3. Other scenarios about putting the body in a crypt I do believe that this was done after they arrested the 2 black men that was blamed for the crime that they did not commit.

4. Here is where the Father with help of …????…..(to be filled in ) went back and make sure that the body will disappears forever. How? Depends on the two scenarios. A) if the body is in the murky water and in the mud they would try to get it back and buried it in a cemetery among the death and that will be a difficult task to open all the graves in Aruba. B) to make sure the body is deep in the murky water with the shoes of Joran so that it will not be found.
The Fathers logic thinking would be like this. Now nobody will find her because we hide it so well, nobody is going to look in a cemetery or in the Murky Waters of Aruba and if you are going to search where to begin and with time the longer the body stays in the mud, the deeper it will sink and these are fresh water reservoirs and not salt water and the body will not come up never. As for the cemetery theory, it will be difficult to search without disturbing the graves. and another drawback is that you need permission of the families to open all the Kelders.
My Review:
With Google Earth I was able to pinpoint the possible location where one can lose a shoe in the mud and also how far it is from the Whitehouse Location and keeping an eye on the time to do the job.
The story about dumping the body on the beach cannot be done because you have already a dead body on your hand and you can do that. The chance to be seen with a dead body to high and risky.
Finding someone to dump it in the ocean means more people involved and the chance to be snitch on will increase and the chance to be seen by the coast guard is high. Also body will float back if not tied down in on the bottom floor of the sea.. This requires a more depth knowledge of buoyancy and understanding of the ocean currents of Aruba and knowing that when the wind turn even sunken boats come back to shore. No this does not compute either.

Conclusion:
the only way the body can be found is to search for the shoes round the edges for the murky pools in Aruba and when the sneaker is found, the body will be there also.

The reason they got away is that there is not a body to link the crime to.
The Father of Joran stated clearly that if there is NOT A BODY there will be NO CASE.

So to make the above statement true, the perps must have make sure that the body cannot be found, but they forgot one thing, a Body will be decompose slowly in mud and it will be found with time. Ask Aruba to search the edged of all these murky water reservoirs and where you find the sneakers you will find the body

Its is like the OJ case “The Glove does not Fit then you must quit the case” but in this case we have a missing link that is the shoes of Joran V/D Sloot.

Please review and Let me know what you bloggers think of this

Best Regards
Casplockwizard@hotmail.com

Dec 23, 7:44 PM


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #788 12/31/08 -
Post by: wingnut on December 31, 2008, 07:02:15 PM
Kyle: I have not given anything to the FBI since the pictures and statements from Dec 29th

In his own words, proof that the images from the recovery on January 7th were NOT given to the FBI.


 
Kyle: I've talked with Peter Shouten numerous times back in February. He hasn't seen anything but knows about the blue fabrics. DeVries and Endemol was interested in purchasing the ROV footage and I was working between them, ABC, and CBS to strike a deal.

However, in February he was trying to sell them. 

 ::MonkeyNoNo::


Wingnut

Kyle Kingman's own words at both the Natalee's Freebird's site and the Scared Monkey's site expose John S.'s betrayal of Natalee Holloway, her family and those who sacrificially donated to the the Persistance undertaking.

Considering that Kyle failed to immediately notify the FBI and family when he set foot on American soil regarding the second set of ROV images and .his concerns encompassing the John S/ALE connection ... it can only be assumed that somewhere along the way he had a change of heart and became a participant in the finale to the great Aruban coverup.

Happy New Year.

Janet


I was duped.  I donated.

Happy New Year to you as well.  Auld Lang Syne...........



Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #788 12/31/08 -
Post by: Tamikosmom on December 31, 2008, 07:03:34 PM
Hi Mum!I'll be awaiting your post regarding me stirring the pot and what my reasoning is for?? ::MonkeyDance:: ::MonkeyDance:: ::MonkeyDance::

Keepthefaith

Have you been baaaad ... veeeery veeeery baaaad?

 ::MonkeyHaHa::

Youngest son and Dutch American wife are attending a family union in Seattle tomorrow ... you nic of the woods.  If the noise gets too loud ... please don't call the police.  Just drop in.  Those Dutch relatives know how to party without a drop of alcohol and ... they are very welcomingl.

Happy New Year

Janet



Janet, you and veggie have a blast and party down!
Happy New Year to you and your family, may they all be blessed.



Hey Kermit

We will be out for the evening ... however you, Miss Piggy and friends can have the use of the heated pond at the back of the property.  Just rub your little hind legs together and ... the little Japanese lanterns outlining the pond will automatically turn on.  If Miss Piggy claps her two front feet ... it will also activate those little lights.  Have fun my friend!

Happy New Year.

Janet


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #788 12/31/08 -
Post by: Kermit on December 31, 2008, 07:06:12 PM
Hi Mum!I'll be awaiting your post regarding me stirring the pot and what my reasoning is for?? ::MonkeyDance:: ::MonkeyDance:: ::MonkeyDance::

Keepthefaith

Have you been baaaad ... veeeery veeeery baaaad?

 ::MonkeyHaHa::

Youngest son and Dutch American wife are attending a family union in Seattle tomorrow ... you nic of the woods.  If the noise gets too loud ... please don't call the police.  Just drop in.  Those Dutch relatives know how to party without a drop of alcohol and ... they are very welcomingl.

Happy New Year

Janet



Janet, you and veggie have a blast and party down!
Happy New Year to you and your family, may they all be blessed.



Hey Kermit

We will be out for the evening ... however you, Miss Piggy and friends can have the use of the heated pond at the back of the property.  Just rub your little hind legs together and ... the little Japanese lanterns outlining the pond will automatically turn on.  If Miss Piggy claps her two front feet ... it will also activate those little lights.  Have fun my friend!

Happy New Year.

Janet

Hey, those lanterns sound very romantic and I know Miss Piggy would enjoy some alone time in that pond again.
Thank you for the invitation, we'll get on the express and fly in.
Would love to sip some Hortons hot coffee with you one morning.

Happy New Year.



Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #788 12/31/08 -
Post by: Tamikosmom on December 31, 2008, 07:09:12 PM
HAPPY NEW YEARS ALL!!!

Janet
4:10 PM PT


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #788 12/31/08 -
Post by: Keepthefaith on December 31, 2008, 07:09:56 PM
HAPPY NEW YEARS ALL!!!

Janet
4:10 PM PT


Happy New Year!! ::MonkeyDance:: ::MonkeyDance:: ::MonkeyDance::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #788 12/31/08 -
Post by: Magnolia on December 31, 2008, 07:11:01 PM
HAPPY NEW YEARS ALL!!!

Janet
4:10 PM PT


Happy New Year, Janet.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #788 12/31/08 -
Post by: Kermit on December 31, 2008, 07:11:12 PM
Blonde,
I hope you feel better hon.



Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #788 12/31/08 -
Post by: wingnut on December 31, 2008, 07:11:52 PM
Caps first post on the front page of SM from an Aruban IP:

Quote
CapslockWizard wrote:
ok, I have read all your comments and I was wondering…. If the boddy can not be found is because it is put where nobody should look for…

Wel the only answer that I can come up with is a cemetary among all the other deads in Aruba… but the question is which one.

I aruba when someone day they do not usually put their dead in the ground but in something called a Kelder… A Kelder is like a small place made form stone where the families will burried their loveones. Most of them are sealed but you can find one that is open and put a body in one and seal it with only 5 cement block and a coat of paint and no one will ever look there. becuase it is the cemetary.

So Nathally must be in a cemetary and thats why it can not be found and thats my logic.

Dec 20, 11:08 PM
A post a few days later from a different Aruban IP:

Quote
Capslockwizard wrote:

This is my analysis about the disappearing and the events on that day. There are two possible scenarios that will fit a logic question.
The Logic question is “Where would I hide a body so that nobody will find it and at the same time lose my shoes?”

Tools I have used are:

1. Goolge Earth with Aruba MAP and area location to pin possible scenarios.
2. Time Line Event of the case.
3. My logic and Strategic thinking on solving problems.
4. Ttime line from the website http://members.aol.com/worldJOURNIER/NATALEE/NATALEEtimeline.html
I believe there is a fundamental flaw the way the authorities see the case.
If the Investigators cannot find Nathalie is because they are searching and looking in the wrong places or they must know but would not come forward.
If you ask yourself this question: “Where would I hide a body so that nobody will find it and at the same time lose my shoes?”
The answers are a lot of places can be used, but for a logic thinker there is only one answer.
And form all the articles that I have read, nobody have suggested and even mention this place.
TEST LOGIG SENARIO 1:
In Aruba in when someone dies, they can be put to rest in two ways.

1. In the grounds. But this procedure has stop due to not enough cemetery.

2. In a Kelder. A Kelder is a place above ground with 4 or 6 rooms constructed out of brick and mortar inside a Cemetery. These Kelders belong to a Family and they buy these plots form the church in the cemetery and build the Kelders on it and leave it open for when the moment arrived you have a place to rest.

Both types of method funerals will take place only in a CEMETARY.

There are several (7) CEMETARY in Aruba and most of them have KELDERS and a lot are left OPEN for when he or she dies will be buried close in the Family plot. From those seven, three is close from my analysis and from those 3, the one in Noord is to visible and no high walls. The one in Ponton/ Oranjestad is in public site from the front but from the back it has possibilities. The one in Paradera has most likely and it has a wall but anybody with a pickup or can climb easy over the wall second it is no visible from public site.

The reason that no one can find her is that she must be among all the dead in the cemetery and who is going to search a cemetery for a body where there is already a lot of body in the place.
You will never find an open grave in the ground because when someone dies in Aruba and need to be buried in the ground, the Funeral home in charge of the body will give orders to dig a grave for this person in a district in accordance with the family wishes.

To dig a grave 6 feet deep and wide enough for a body will take a lot of time by hand. Beside the ground will look disturb by the cemetery keeper. So I believe that these 4 perps would not have the time to dig a grave.

But

If you have a dead body on your hand and you need to hide it fast, the only way is to put it in an open Kelder and with only five to 6 bricks and and a bucket of cement and you are done. And if you want to make it look professional, can even give it a coat of paint color white which is the mostly use.

This last process is very easy done with 3 or 4 person.

a. Move dead body to a cemetery,

b. Cemetery door closed, then jump the fence with the body.

c. Inside the cemetery look for an open Kelder or break one open.

d. Put body in it

e. Go and get 6 pieces of bricks or use bricks that are in the cemetery already.

f. Make cement in a bucket

g. Use the bricks to close the small walls of the Kelder.

h. Paint the wall

And you are done.

The flaws with this logic are that it do not account for a missing shoe.
And so this cannot be complete true and do not compute. But possible

TEST LOGIG SENARIO 2:

1. Normaly if one want to have sex in Aruba that comes from the clubs go to a place call WHITEHOUSE and not the LIGHTHOUSE and they sound almost identical (Here I think ether the Investigator hear it wrong and JoraN and K2 continue with the kakamenia storie about the LightHouse or it was plan-out between them.) The Whitehouse is an apartment Complex where one drive in with the car into an Apartment with automatic garage doors attached. One in the garage you are also in the apartment. These apartments are for some to go and have sex in and one pay 50.00 for a couple of hours use. If foul play was committed in one of these rooms or if she was overdosed in one of these rooms, nobody will see or hear. Add checkout time you just hop in your car in the garage and drive out to the gate and no one will notice anything as she could be asleep in the back seat. Now you have a dead body that you have to get rid of in your car… you could not bring a dead body to a hotel… you have to get rid of it…and here is my view of what next move will be.

2. The next move is to look for a place to dump the body and here is where the missing shoes come to play and also the story that they were driving around statement comes to play a role). It is dark, almost 3:00 am and in Aruba there are several murky water reservoirs that can be used to dump the body (see Google Earth – Aruba) in it and she would be gone. But the question is which one? Well looking at the map you can see that from the Whitehouse Building there several c that can be used and there is one behind the Whitehouse building. Once first instinct is to dump the body there since it is closely when you exit the Whitehouse building. Now here is where it gets interesting depending how many people you have to help you carry the body to the murky pool. And not knowing that the closer you get to one of these murky pools, your feet will sink into this thick mud and when you try to pull your feet out, it will not come out because the mud has a suction that seals around the plastic of the sneakers and the only way out is to pull your feet out of the sneakers and leave the sneakers behind.
Also when you are in a hurry to get rid of the body you will not think to go get your sneakers and it is dark in that area. And I believe that that’s why Joram was without a sneaker. Now there is still a question not answer, Was Joran alone or did he got help? Knowing what we know from all that has been written about the case and blog out there. We know that the Kalpoes came to help. I do believe that Joran is stronger and weight more and that he Dump the body in one of these reservoirs and that’s why he lost his shoes. Now Joran is bear feet walking? From where was he coming from?. One thing is sure he was going to papa and mama. But what happened to the helpers? Why they did not drive Joran home. Or was it that Joran acted alone and called the Kalpoes after all what has happened to him.

3. Other scenarios about putting the body in a crypt I do believe that this was done after they arrested the 2 black men that was blamed for the crime that they did not commit.

4. Here is where the Father with help of …????…..(to be filled in ) went back and make sure that the body will disappears forever. How? Depends on the two scenarios. A) if the body is in the murky water and in the mud they would try to get it back and buried it in a cemetery among the death and that will be a difficult task to open all the graves in Aruba. B) to make sure the body is deep in the murky water with the shoes of Joran so that it will not be found.
The Fathers logic thinking would be like this. Now nobody will find her because we hide it so well, nobody is going to look in a cemetery or in the Murky Waters of Aruba and if you are going to search where to begin and with time the longer the body stays in the mud, the deeper it will sink and these are fresh water reservoirs and not salt water and the body will not come up never. As for the cemetery theory, it will be difficult to search without disturbing the graves. and another drawback is that you need permission of the families to open all the Kelders.
My Review:
With Google Earth I was able to pinpoint the possible location where one can lose a shoe in the mud and also how far it is from the Whitehouse Location and keeping an eye on the time to do the job.
The story about dumping the body on the beach cannot be done because you have already a dead body on your hand and you can do that. The chance to be seen with a dead body to high and risky.
Finding someone to dump it in the ocean means more people involved and the chance to be snitch on will increase and the chance to be seen by the coast guard is high. Also body will float back if not tied down in on the bottom floor of the sea.. This requires a more depth knowledge of buoyancy and understanding of the ocean currents of Aruba and knowing that when the wind turn even sunken boats come back to shore. No this does not compute either.

Conclusion:
the only way the body can be found is to search for the shoes round the edges for the murky pools in Aruba and when the sneaker is found, the body will be there also.

The reason they got away is that there is not a body to link the crime to.
The Father of Joran stated clearly that if there is NOT A BODY there will be NO CASE.

So to make the above statement true, the perps must have make sure that the body cannot be found, but they forgot one thing, a Body will be decompose slowly in mud and it will be found with time. Ask Aruba to search the edged of all these murky water reservoirs and where you find the sneakers you will find the body

Its is like the OJ case “The Glove does not Fit then you must quit the case” but in this case we have a missing link that is the shoes of Joran V/D Sloot.

Please review and Let me know what you bloggers think of this

Best Regards
Casplockwizard@hotmail.com

Dec 23, 7:44 PM



Ummm, are these posts written by the same person?  The second post contains parts that are more literate than the first post.  Almost like the second post is written by someone who has a good grasp of the English language, but is purposely trying to disguise that.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #788 12/31/08 -
Post by: Kermit on December 31, 2008, 07:12:42 PM
HOOPING GOOD NEW YEAR TO EVERYONE!

Hello 2009!





Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #788 12/31/08 -
Post by: finngirl on December 31, 2008, 07:15:14 PM

Ummm, are these posts written by the same person?  The second post contains parts that are more literate than the first post.  Almost like the second post is written by someone who has a good grasp of the English language, but is purposely trying to disguise that.

 :wink:



Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #788 12/31/08 -
Post by: MuffyBee on December 31, 2008, 07:15:53 PM
HOOPING GOOD NEW YEAR TO EVERYONE!

Hello 2009!





(http://bestsmileys.com/otherhol/3.gif)


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #788 12/31/08 -
Post by: Magnolia on December 31, 2008, 07:16:36 PM
HOOPING GOOD NEW YEAR TO EVERYONE!

Hello 2009!





Happy New Year, Kermit.
I am very thankful for your courage and dedication.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #788 12/31/08 -
Post by: Kermit on December 31, 2008, 07:17:06 PM
Kyle said: "Based on the little I know of Simian, there are striking similarities that stood out after I laid down on the evening I met with the detective and his brother.Perhaps Simian is the detective and Shango is the brother.


Kyle said: May 12, 2008
My opinion on Simian is that he is a detective/cop involved in the case since the beginning. My understanding is that there is only one of the originals remaining. He came to us during the search along with his brother who had a "vision" on where Natalee was disposed. The vision was cryptic and actually contained a latitude which from what he claimed could have been anywhere in the world. The brother thought they were coordinates, but it was just a latitude. Oddly, the latitude was within a half mile from where we found the trap and centered on Arashi beach.
<snip>
He spoke well enough english and knew everything in my opinion.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #788 12/31/08 -
Post by: Tibrogargan on December 31, 2008, 07:17:32 PM
Happy newyear to all  . .

(http://i272.photobucket.com/albums/jj176/bastibro/newyear.jpg)

Let`s all keep praying for Justice4Natalee,

Thank you for the fireworks, Bastibro.  They are certainly a lot more colourful than the ones here in the cage the past couple of days.

I have logged in to reassure everyone that there will indeed be a 2009.  It has already arrived here safely and my best wishes to all for the New Year.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #788 12/31/08 -
Post by: Kermit on December 31, 2008, 07:18:19 PM
HOOPING GOOD NEW YEAR TO EVERYONE!

Hello 2009!





Happy New Year, Kermit.
I am very thankful for your courage and dedication.

Thank you Magnolia. I know it was difficult at first for you to trust me. And it means a lot that you do.
HOPPING good New Year to you.



Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #788 12/31/08 -
Post by: Kermit on December 31, 2008, 07:19:05 PM
HOOPING GOOD NEW YEAR TO EVERYONE!

Hello 2009!





(http://bestsmileys.com/otherhol/3.gif)

Little Muff Muff!
Hopping Good new Year to you.



Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #788 12/31/08 -
Post by: klaasend on December 31, 2008, 07:20:54 PM
Kyle said: "Based on the little I know of Simian, there are striking similarities that stood out after I laid down on the evening I met with the detective and his brother.Perhaps Simian is the detective and Shango is the brother.


Kyle said: May 12, 2008
My opinion on Simian is that he is a detective/cop involved in the case since the beginning. My understanding is that there is only one of the originals remaining. He came to us during the search along with his brother who had a "vision" on where Natalee was disposed. The vision was cryptic and actually contained a latitude which from what he claimed could have been anywhere in the world. The brother thought they were coordinates, but it was just a latitude. Oddly, the latitude was within a half mile from where we found the trap and centered on Arashi beach.
<snip>
He spoke well enough english and knew everything in my opinion.


Kyle's opinion of Simian came directly from people like Hotshot and others that were emailing him info. 

My research told me that Clyde Burke was Simian.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #788 12/31/08 -
Post by: Tibrogargan on December 31, 2008, 07:20:57 PM

Ummm, are these posts written by the same person?  The second post contains parts that are more literate than the first post.  Almost like the second post is written by someone who has a good grasp of the English language, but is purposely trying to disguise that.

 :wink:




There were several of us that noticed and even dared to question the obvious differences in the standard of English used over many of the posts made.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #788 12/31/08 -
Post by: Kermit on December 31, 2008, 07:21:18 PM

Ummm, are these posts written by the same person?  The second post contains parts that are more literate than the first post.  Almost like the second post is written by someone who has a good grasp of the English language, but is purposely trying to disguise that.

 :wink:



Yes, Finngirl posted something last night and it was very insightful about the initials and how Caps was telling them something that was not true. Since he lives in Aruba, one would think he would know and he didn't.
Finngirl caught it! Good job!





Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #788 12/31/08 -
Post by: Magnolia on December 31, 2008, 07:21:26 PM
[quote

Dec 23, 7:44 PM [/quote]
[/quote]


Ummm, are these posts written by the same person?  The second post contains parts that are more literate than the first post.  Almost like the second post is written by someone who has a good grasp of the English language, but is purposely trying to disguise that.

[/quote]

I agree.  It is real obvious when you read them one right after the other.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #788 12/31/08 -
Post by: bleachedblack on December 31, 2008, 07:22:58 PM

klaasend
Administrator
Monkey All Star
*
Online Online
Posts: 45530
View Profile WWW   
Re: Natalee Case Discussion #788 12/31/08 -
« Reply #43 on: Today at 12:17:40 PM »

Klassend is correct in that Dave has Mark Purcell checking out what Caps tells Dave.








And that, in and of itself, is horribly, horribly frightening!

Questions were posted back in February I think.  Who was the "leak".  IMO the leak is coming direct from Dave Holloway via Robin and Mark Purcell.  Sorry to say but that's how I feel.

the leak is coming via Kath and Caps to Dave to Mark. Case closed. Mark to ALE. ALE to Silvetti. Silvetti to Jossy.

what a tangled mess.

Janet said it best - the chance was most likely lost forever.

....and Jossy was named Man of the Year


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #788 12/31/08 -
Post by: Kermit on December 31, 2008, 07:22:58 PM
Kyle said: "Based on the little I know of Simian, there are striking similarities that stood out after I laid down on the evening I met with the detective and his brother.Perhaps Simian is the detective and Shango is the brother.


Kyle said: May 12, 2008
My opinion on Simian is that he is a detective/cop involved in the case since the beginning. My understanding is that there is only one of the originals remaining. He came to us during the search along with his brother who had a "vision" on where Natalee was disposed. The vision was cryptic and actually contained a latitude which from what he claimed could have been anywhere in the world. The brother thought they were coordinates, but it was just a latitude. Oddly, the latitude was within a half mile from where we found the trap and centered on Arashi beach.
<snip>
He spoke well enough english and knew everything in my opinion.


Kyle's opinion of Simian came directly from people like Hotshot and others that were emailing him info. 

My research told me that Clyde Burke was Simian.

Yes I remember you exposed that a long time ago.
AND isn't it interesting that it is Clyde Burke who is there with Helen Lejuez and the Caps witness!


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #788 12/31/08 -
Post by: texasmom on December 31, 2008, 07:27:41 PM
Kermit,
I have company and have been trying to cook and keep up, not an easy task.

Are you saying that Caps was a total diversion from the beginning?  If so, how did that come about if you know?

I'm still in shock that Dave is still trusting MIP6!   ::MonkeyShocked::

Thanks in advance, and Happy New Year!



Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #788 12/31/08 -
Post by: Hotshot on December 31, 2008, 07:28:43 PM

klaasend
Administrator
Monkey All Star
*
Online Online
Posts: 45530
View Profile WWW   
Re: Natalee Case Discussion #788 12/31/08 -
« Reply #43 on: Today at 12:17:40 PM »

Klassend is correct in that Dave has Mark Purcell checking out what Caps tells Dave.








And that, in and of itself, is horribly, horribly frightening!

Questions were posted back in February I think.  Who was the "leak".  IMO the leak is coming direct from Dave Holloway via Robin and Mark Purcell.  Sorry to say but that's how I feel.

the leak is coming via Kath and Caps to Dave to Mark. Case closed. Mark to ALE. ALE to Silvetti. Silvetti to Jossy.

what a tangled mess.

Janet said it best - the chance was most likely lost forever.
Your sick.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #788 12/31/08 -
Post by: Kermit on December 31, 2008, 07:31:59 PM

klaasend
Administrator
Monkey All Star
*
Online Online
Posts: 45530
View Profile WWW   
Re: Natalee Case Discussion #788 12/31/08 -
« Reply #43 on: Today at 12:17:40 PM »

Klassend is correct in that Dave has Mark Purcell checking out what Caps tells Dave.








And that, in and of itself, is horribly, horribly frightening!

Questions were posted back in February I think.  Who was the "leak".  IMO the leak is coming direct from Dave Holloway via Robin and Mark Purcell.  Sorry to say but that's how I feel.

the leak is coming via Kath and Caps to Dave to Mark. Case closed. Mark to ALE. ALE to Silvetti. Silvetti to Jossy.

what a tangled mess.

Janet said it best - the chance was most likely lost forever.
Your sick.

Actually it would be You're or You are. Not your.



Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #788 12/31/08 -
Post by: MuffyBee on December 31, 2008, 07:44:09 PM
(http://bestsmileys.com/movingeyes/3.gif)


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #788 12/31/08 -
Post by: San on December 31, 2008, 07:45:38 PM
(http://i34.photobucket.com/albums/d118/Sanddrops/happy_new_year_party_stuff_falling_.gif)


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #788 12/31/08 -
Post by: bastibro on December 31, 2008, 07:45:47 PM
Quote
. . John Silvetti moved the contents of the trap to the pond and was working with the ALE to hide evidence that was in that trap.

Now what in the world could be the reason for Silvetti to do that?!
Who is buying that crap ::MonkeyNoNo::

bastibro

Who is the source of the words "John Silvetti moved the contents of the trap to the pond and was working with the ALE to hide evidence that was in that trap."

Link please.

Thank you.

Janet

Do i really have to answer that . . isn`t it obvious who said that, not in that exact words but it comes down to the same, Janet.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #788 12/31/08 -
Post by: AZSunny on December 31, 2008, 07:46:42 PM
Caps first post on the front page of SM from an Aruban IP:

Quote
CapslockWizard wrote:
ok, I have read all your comments and I was wondering…. If the boddy can not be found is because it is put where nobody should look for…

Wel the only answer that I can come up with is a cemetary among all the other deads in Aruba… but the question is which one.

I aruba when someone day they do not usually put their dead in the ground but in something called a Kelder… A Kelder is like a small place made form stone where the families will burried their loveones. Most of them are sealed but you can find one that is open and put a body in one and seal it with only 5 cement block and a coat of paint and no one will ever look there. becuase it is the cemetary.

So Nathally must be in a cemetary and thats why it can not be found and thats my logic.

Dec 20, 11:08 PM
A post a few days later from a different Aruban IP:

Quote
Capslockwizard wrote:

This is my analysis about the disappearing and the events on that day. There are two possible scenarios that will fit a logic question.
The Logic question is “Where would I hide a body so that nobody will find it and at the same time lose my shoes?”

Tools I have used are:

1. Goolge Earth with Aruba MAP and area location to pin possible scenarios.
2. Time Line Event of the case.
3. My logic and Strategic thinking on solving problems.
4. Ttime line from the website http://members.aol.com/worldJOURNIER/NATALEE/NATALEEtimeline.html
I believe there is a fundamental flaw the way the authorities see the case.
If the Investigators cannot find Nathalie is because they are searching and looking in the wrong places or they must know but would not come forward.
If you ask yourself this question: “Where would I hide a body so that nobody will find it and at the same time lose my shoes?”
The answers are a lot of places can be used, but for a logic thinker there is only one answer.
And form all the articles that I have read, nobody have suggested and even mention this place.
TEST LOGIG SENARIO 1:
In Aruba in when someone dies, they can be put to rest in two ways.

1. In the grounds. But this procedure has stop due to not enough cemetery.

2. In a Kelder. A Kelder is a place above ground with 4 or 6 rooms constructed out of brick and mortar inside a Cemetery. These Kelders belong to a Family and they buy these plots form the church in the cemetery and build the Kelders on it and leave it open for when the moment arrived you have a place to rest.

Both types of method funerals will take place only in a CEMETARY.

There are several (7) CEMETARY in Aruba and most of them have KELDERS and a lot are left OPEN for when he or she dies will be buried close in the Family plot. From those seven, three is close from my analysis and from those 3, the one in Noord is to visible and no high walls. The one in Ponton/ Oranjestad is in public site from the front but from the back it has possibilities. The one in Paradera has most likely and it has a wall but anybody with a pickup or can climb easy over the wall second it is no visible from public site.

The reason that no one can find her is that she must be among all the dead in the cemetery and who is going to search a cemetery for a body where there is already a lot of body in the place.
You will never find an open grave in the ground because when someone dies in Aruba and need to be buried in the ground, the Funeral home in charge of the body will give orders to dig a grave for this person in a district in accordance with the family wishes.

To dig a grave 6 feet deep and wide enough for a body will take a lot of time by hand. Beside the ground will look disturb by the cemetery keeper. So I believe that these 4 perps would not have the time to dig a grave.

But

If you have a dead body on your hand and you need to hide it fast, the only way is to put it in an open Kelder and with only five to 6 bricks and and a bucket of cement and you are done. And if you want to make it look professional, can even give it a coat of paint color white which is the mostly use.

This last process is very easy done with 3 or 4 person.

a. Move dead body to a cemetery,

b. Cemetery door closed, then jump the fence with the body.

c. Inside the cemetery look for an open Kelder or break one open.

d. Put body in it

e. Go and get 6 pieces of bricks or use bricks that are in the cemetery already.

f. Make cement in a bucket

g. Use the bricks to close the small walls of the Kelder.

h. Paint the wall

And you are done.

The flaws with this logic are that it do not account for a missing shoe.
And so this cannot be complete true and do not compute. But possible

TEST LOGIG SENARIO 2:

1. Normaly if one want to have sex in Aruba that comes from the clubs go to a place call WHITEHOUSE and not the LIGHTHOUSE and they sound almost identical (Here I think ether the Investigator hear it wrong and JoraN and K2 continue with the kakamenia storie about the LightHouse or it was plan-out between them.) The Whitehouse is an apartment Complex where one drive in with the car into an Apartment with automatic garage doors attached. One in the garage you are also in the apartment. These apartments are for some to go and have sex in and one pay 50.00 for a couple of hours use. If foul play was committed in one of these rooms or if she was overdosed in one of these rooms, nobody will see or hear. Add checkout time you just hop in your car in the garage and drive out to the gate and no one will notice anything as she could be asleep in the back seat. Now you have a dead body that you have to get rid of in your car… you could not bring a dead body to a hotel… you have to get rid of it…and here is my view of what next move will be.

2. The next move is to look for a place to dump the body and here is where the missing shoes come to play and also the story that they were driving around statement comes to play a role). It is dark, almost 3:00 am and in Aruba there are several murky water reservoirs that can be used to dump the body (see Google Earth – Aruba) in it and she would be gone. But the question is which one? Well looking at the map you can see that from the Whitehouse Building there several c that can be used and there is one behind the Whitehouse building. Once first instinct is to dump the body there since it is closely when you exit the Whitehouse building. Now here is where it gets interesting depending how many people you have to help you carry the body to the murky pool. And not knowing that the closer you get to one of these murky pools, your feet will sink into this thick mud and when you try to pull your feet out, it will not come out because the mud has a suction that seals around the plastic of the sneakers and the only way out is to pull your feet out of the sneakers and leave the sneakers behind.
Also when you are in a hurry to get rid of the body you will not think to go get your sneakers and it is dark in that area. And I believe that that’s why Joram was without a sneaker. Now there is still a question not answer, Was Joran alone or did he got help? Knowing what we know from all that has been written about the case and blog out there. We know that the Kalpoes came to help. I do believe that Joran is stronger and weight more and that he Dump the body in one of these reservoirs and that’s why he lost his shoes. Now Joran is bear feet walking? From where was he coming from?. One thing is sure he was going to papa and mama. But what happened to the helpers? Why they did not drive Joran home. Or was it that Joran acted alone and called the Kalpoes after all what has happened to him.

3. Other scenarios about putting the body in a crypt I do believe that this was done after they arrested the 2 black men that was blamed for the crime that they did not commit.

4. Here is where the Father with help of …????…..(to be filled in ) went back and make sure that the body will disappears forever. How? Depends on the two scenarios. A) if the body is in the murky water and in the mud they would try to get it back and buried it in a cemetery among the death and that will be a difficult task to open all the graves in Aruba. B) to make sure the body is deep in the murky water with the shoes of Joran so that it will not be found.
The Fathers logic thinking would be like this. Now nobody will find her because we hide it so well, nobody is going to look in a cemetery or in the Murky Waters of Aruba and if you are going to search where to begin and with time the longer the body stays in the mud, the deeper it will sink and these are fresh water reservoirs and not salt water and the body will not come up never. As for the cemetery theory, it will be difficult to search without disturbing the graves. and another drawback is that you need permission of the families to open all the Kelders.
My Review:
With Google Earth I was able to pinpoint the possible location where one can lose a shoe in the mud and also how far it is from the Whitehouse Location and keeping an eye on the time to do the job.
The story about dumping the body on the beach cannot be done because you have already a dead body on your hand and you can do that. The chance to be seen with a dead body to high and risky.
Finding someone to dump it in the ocean means more people involved and the chance to be snitch on will increase and the chance to be seen by the coast guard is high. Also body will float back if not tied down in on the bottom floor of the sea.. This requires a more depth knowledge of buoyancy and understanding of the ocean currents of Aruba and knowing that when the wind turn even sunken boats come back to shore. No this does not compute either.

Conclusion:
the only way the body can be found is to search for the shoes round the edges for the murky pools in Aruba and when the sneaker is found, the body will be there also.

The reason they got away is that there is not a body to link the crime to.
The Father of Joran stated clearly that if there is NOT A BODY there will be NO CASE.

So to make the above statement true, the perps must have make sure that the body cannot be found, but they forgot one thing, a Body will be decompose slowly in mud and it will be found with time. Ask Aruba to search the edged of all these murky water reservoirs and where you find the sneakers you will find the body

Its is like the OJ case “The Glove does not Fit then you must quit the case” but in this case we have a missing link that is the shoes of Joran V/D Sloot.

Please review and Let me know what you bloggers think of this

Best Regards
Casplockwizard@hotmail.com

Dec 23, 7:44 PM



Ummm, are these posts written by the same person?  The second post contains parts that are more literate than the first post.  Almost like the second post is written by someone who has a good grasp of the English language, but is purposely trying to disguise that.

Who were the two brothers that came to talk to someone, one brother was quite difficult to understand, and had limited english speaking skills, and was a witness to something, and the other brother was a police man, and spoke great english??  Did Kyle post this?   Perhaps they came to talk to him about the cage.  I can't remember the story, but I saw the same discrepancy in the language style and spelling, and that is the first thing that came to my mind.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #788 12/31/08 -
Post by: AZSunny on December 31, 2008, 07:47:47 PM
Kyle said: "Based on the little I know of Simian, there are striking similarities that stood out after I laid down on the evening I met with the detective and his brother.Perhaps Simian is the detective and Shango is the brother.


Kyle said: May 12, 2008
My opinion on Simian is that he is a detective/cop involved in the case since the beginning. My understanding is that there is only one of the originals remaining. He came to us during the search along with his brother who had a "vision" on where Natalee was disposed. The vision was cryptic and actually contained a latitude which from what he claimed could have been anywhere in the world. The brother thought they were coordinates, but it was just a latitude. Oddly, the latitude was within a half mile from where we found the trap and centered on Arashi beach.
<snip>
He spoke well enough english and knew everything in my opinion.


Kermit is all over it, this is what i was talking about.  thanks kermit


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #788 12/31/08 -
Post by: Kermit on December 31, 2008, 07:51:27 PM
Kyle said: "Based on the little I know of Simian, there are striking similarities that stood out after I laid down on the evening I met with the detective and his brother.Perhaps Simian is the detective and Shango is the brother.


Kyle said: May 12, 2008
My opinion on Simian is that he is a detective/cop involved in the case since the beginning. My understanding is that there is only one of the originals remaining. He came to us during the search along with his brother who had a "vision" on where Natalee was disposed. The vision was cryptic and actually contained a latitude which from what he claimed could have been anywhere in the world. The brother thought they were coordinates, but it was just a latitude. Oddly, the latitude was within a half mile from where we found the trap and centered on Arashi beach.
<snip>
He spoke well enough english and knew everything in my opinion.


Kermit is all over it, this is what i was talking about.  thanks kermit

You are welcome.

Hoppy New Year.



Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #788 12/31/08 -
Post by: Blue Moon on December 31, 2008, 07:54:06 PM
Taken from last thread:

Sent to me by Natalee's Freebirds:

Please feel free (if you'd like) to post this at your board.
 
During the journey of the Persistence to Aruba, Kyle reached out and emailed with us.  During that time, one of the questions posed to him was regarding protocol if/when Natalee's remains were found.
 
Kyle's response was that he was unsure, but felt that would be settled before the search began.
 
The cautions were given to him about the lack of integrity on the part of Aruba's law enforcement, prosecutor's office, and its judiciary.
 
Contact with Kyle continued throughout the duration of the search by the Persistence.
 
Once back home, Kyle asked us for our help.  He was very concerned about the activities that transpired during their search - specifically surrounding the find of the fishing cage and its contents.  Kyle wanted our help in presenting this information in a factual way, to then be given to Natalee's family.
 
This was March 18, 2008.  At that time, Kyle assured us he had just recently sent the images from the Dec 30th and Jan 7th dives to the FBI, but had never received a response from them.
 
We later found that to be false.
 
Also at that time, Beth's brother saw the images Kyle had shared with us - but none of the detail he shared later.

We compiled the images Kyle presented us, along with his opinions and the facts surrounding the sequence of events regarding that fishing cage.  Kyle stated he would be getting in touch with Beth Holloway.
 
We later found out that never happened.

At this time, Kyle shared with us the broadcast networks he had approached in February, in an attempt to sell these images to the highest bidder.
 
This didn't concern us greatly at that time - as we were under the impression US law enforcement and Natalee's family had already been made aware of their find.
 
Approximately May 2008 Kyle began dodging questions for details (we had asked for names of Aruban police and divers to be included in our documentation of these events), hedging on moving forward with this, and then he completely disappeared from our board.
 
During that time, we learned Kyle had never contacted Beth, or Dave, or the FBI with this information.
 
We put our original plan into motion - that of presenting this information in a clear and concise manner, and we sent it to Beth Holloway.
 
Beth was disturbed, needed time to digest the information, and wanted to share it with someone she trusts.
 
When Tim Miller was returning to Aruba this past fall, Beth gave us permission to release this information publicly.
 
At that point, we gave it to John Kelly, Carmen Adams with the FBI, and got it ready for public consumption.
 
The next step was to publish this information at our blog.
 
One of our members felt we were betraying Kyle in doing so, contacted him, and he re-surfaced at our site with threats of litigation against us - stating this was his "intellectual property" and we could not use it.
 
That of course concerned us greatly - as none of us could afford to be sued.
 
He also stated at that time, Luis Shaefer had just recently sold the rights of the video of these images to a broadcast company for the purposes of a documentary.
 
We contacted legal counsel and were advised to keep our distance from any Persistence crew member, in the face of potential obstruction/accessory charges.
 
At this point, one of our members decided to brace for the possibility of civil litigation, resigned from our membership to protect it from same, and posted what he knows to be factual at SM.
 
Kyle did tell us human remains were found in that fish cage.
 
Kyle did tell us about John Silvetti's intent to open an office on the island of Aruba, to enable him ease in conducting business in South America, and Aruba.
 
Kyle also told us of John's absolute refusal to give that fish cage and its contents any credence - before even it was inspected on Jan 7th.
 
Kyle told us in no uncertain terms that Tim Miller and Dateline were abruptly removed from the Persistence on Dec 30, resulting in only Persistence crew being aboard between that date and the Jan 7 dive of the Arubans.
 
Nothing that was posted at SM by kermit was incorrect, out of context, or in any way false.
 
Regards,
 
Former Natalee's Freebirds Administrator
Natalee and her family deserve justice - and we will not let up until they have it!

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------


OMG, I just got home and found I am 1 1/2 threads behind.  Gambling in Tunica MS was worth the trip but now I have to read 1 1/2 threads to catch up.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #788 12/31/08 -
Post by: Keepthefaith on December 31, 2008, 07:54:10 PM
Do we know who Silvetti's business partner in the Netherland's is???Anyone.TIA


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #788 12/31/08 -
Post by: SS on December 31, 2008, 07:55:27 PM
I just don't understand why people like Mum and Lalas & idstlou and
all of the former posters here are so angry.
Anybody who reads all of this information should see the
truth to it.  They are nitpicking at the least little word.

Why are they so mad about it all?




Hi Mags, Happy New Year!

I will stick my neck out and speak for myself and please don't look at this as a drive by.  The reason that I am no longer posting has absolutely nothing to do with what I think of the cage or Kyle.  I am no longer posting because I was attacked for asking a very sincere question a few weeks ago, and I sure didn't see anyone else trying to diffuse the attack.  I asked whether Freebirds was the site where Kyle had given Kermit his information.  I also asked why the other Freebirds had left Kermit to reveal all of this alone like a sacrificial lamb or a pinata.  Kermit even responded with a photograph of Lambchops.  One person in particular told me to go back to the forum where that question had originated.  Well, that question originated in my head and as a matter of fact, the question has now answered itself with the emergence of several Freebirds.  So, why was I attacked?  I know that many people on SM belong to additional forums, some of which are private.  Why am I being attacked because I am a member at C&G?  That doesn't mean that I am less of a member at SM.  I don't want to be told where I can participate and I don't want to be ridiculed or insulted because I belong to other forums.  I am not spewing lies about anyone or anything, although it is being said that C&G is doing this.  I have contributed a lot to SM and it has been a labor of love, but I guess I just don't feel comfortable now and I don't want to be attacked. I am so upset by what I see happening here at SM and I really do care about the other monkeys.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #788 12/31/08 -
Post by: sharon on December 31, 2008, 07:58:03 PM

Thanks for all the support guys!  Not only for today, but also for the last 2.5 years.  None of you had to do this - and that you chose to...................well, it means the world to me!!
You are all fantastic people - with hearts of gold, that my faith and trust will forever be with!


We had to stand up for Kermit.

Yes. We did.

And Justice for Natalee.
We will not give up

.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #788 12/31/08 -
Post by: Keepthefaith on December 31, 2008, 07:58:34 PM
I just don't understand why people like Mum and Lalas & idstlou and
all of the former posters here are so angry.
Anybody who reads all of this information should see the
truth to it.  They are nitpicking at the least little word.

Why are they so mad about it all?




Hi Mags, Happy New Year!

I will stick my neck out and speak for myself and please don't look at this as a drive by.  The reason that I am no longer posting has absolutely nothing to do with what I think of the cage or Kyle.  I am no longer posting because I was attacked for asking a very sincere question a few weeks ago, and I sure didn't see anyone else trying to diffuse the attack.  I asked whether Freebirds was the site where Kyle had given Kermit his information.  I also asked why the other Freebirds had left Kermit to reveal all of this alone like a sacrificial lamb or a pinata.  Kermit even responded with a photograph of Lambchops.  One person in particular told me to go back to the forum where that question had originated.  Well, that question originated in my head and as a matter of fact, the question has now answered itself with the emergence of several Freebirds.  So, why was I attacked?  I know that many people on SM belong to additional forums, some of which are private.  Why am I being attacked because I am a member at C&G?  That doesn't mean that I am less of a member at SM.  I don't want to be told where I can participate and I don't want to be ridiculed or insulted because I belong to other forums.  I am not spewing lies about anyone or anything, although it is being said that C&G is doing this.  I have contributed a lot to SM and it has been a labor of love, but I guess I just don't feel comfortable now and I don't want to be attacked. I am so upset by what I see happening here at SM and I really do care about the other monkeys.

Hello SS and Happy New Year!I've been told today that i'm stirring the pot.Isn't asking questions how we get to the TRUTH??It's OK to agree to disagree.We are all Monkey's.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #788 12/31/08 -
Post by: SunnyinTX on December 31, 2008, 08:00:20 PM

klaasend
Administrator
Monkey All Star
*
Online Online
Posts: 45530
View Profile WWW   
Re: Natalee Case Discussion #788 12/31/08 -
« Reply #43 on: Today at 12:17:40 PM »

Klassend is correct in that Dave has Mark Purcell checking out what Caps tells Dave.

WTF?? Why in the hell would Dave do that? SCARY!!  Dave needs to get his head outta his ass!!


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #788 12/31/08 -
Post by: texasmom on December 31, 2008, 08:02:53 PM
I just don't understand why people like Mum and Lalas & idstlou and
all of the former posters here are so angry.
Anybody who reads all of this information should see the
truth to it.  They are nitpicking at the least little word.

Why are they so mad about it all?





Hi Mags, Happy New Year!

I will stick my neck out and speak for myself and please don't look at this as a drive by.  The reason that I am no longer posting has absolutely nothing to do with what I think of the cage or Kyle.  I am no longer posting because I was attacked for asking a very sincere question a few weeks ago, and I sure didn't see anyone else trying to diffuse the attack.  I asked whether Freebirds was the site where Kyle had given Kermit his information.  I also asked why the other Freebirds had left Kermit to reveal all of this alone like a sacrificial lamb or a pinata.  Kermit even responded with a photograph of Lambchops.  One person in particular told me to go back to the forum where that question had originated.  Well, that question originated in my head and as a matter of fact, the question has now answered itself with the emergence of several Freebirds.  So, why was I attacked?  I know that many people on SM belong to additional forums, some of which are private.  Why am I being attacked because I am a member at C&G?  That doesn't mean that I am less of a member at SM.  I don't want to be told where I can participate and I don't want to be ridiculed or insulted because I belong to other forums.  I am not spewing lies about anyone or anything, although it is being said that C&G is doing this.  I have contributed a lot to SM and it has been a labor of love, but I guess I just don't feel comfortable now and I don't want to be attacked. I am so upset by what I see happening here at SM and I really do care about the other monkeys.

Any mod,
Do I respond to this.  She is starting it again.  She was never ATTACKED and she knows it.  This is ridiculous.  We were told to end it then, and we did.  


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #788 12/31/08 -
Post by: klaasend on December 31, 2008, 08:03:34 PM
I just don't understand why people like Mum and Lalas & idstlou and
all of the former posters here are so angry.
Anybody who reads all of this information should see the
truth to it.  They are nitpicking at the least little word.

Why are they so mad about it all?




Hi Mags, Happy New Year!

I will stick my neck out and speak for myself and please don't look at this as a drive by.  The reason that I am no longer posting has absolutely nothing to do with what I think of the cage or Kyle.  I am no longer posting because I was attacked for asking a very sincere question a few weeks ago, and I sure didn't see anyone else trying to diffuse the attack.  I asked whether Freebirds was the site where Kyle had given Kermit his information.  I also asked why the other Freebirds had left Kermit to reveal all of this alone like a sacrificial lamb or a pinata.  Kermit even responded with a photograph of Lambchops.  One person in particular told me to go back to the forum where that question had originated.  Well, that question originated in my head and as a matter of fact, the question has now answered itself with the emergence of several Freebirds.  So, why was I attacked?  I know that many people on SM belong to additional forums, some of which are private.  Why am I being attacked because I am a member at C&G?  That doesn't mean that I am less of a member at SM.  I don't want to be told where I can participate and I don't want to be ridiculed or insulted because I belong to other forums.  I am not spewing lies about anyone or anything, although it is being said that C&G is doing this.  I have contributed a lot to SM and it has been a labor of love, but I guess I just don't feel comfortable now and I don't want to be attacked. I am so upset by what I see happening here at SM and I really do care about the other monkeys.

If you read a few pages back you will see why I have a problem with C&G, I made that very clear.  The incidence you are referring to I believe is when Texasmom question you.  So you are allowing one person questioning you to run you off? Wow, ok. 


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #788 12/31/08 -
Post by: MuffyBee on December 31, 2008, 08:04:58 PM
Hi SS.  I noticed your absence.  I went to check your last posts when I didn't see you here for a few days, and saw you came by to wish us Merry Christmas, and that was it.  I personally am not fond of private forums, because they are number three on my list of things that seem to cause trouble on this forum (right behind politics and religion).  However, just because that is how I feel about them in general does not make me dislike you or any one else that is a member of one.  What I dislike is how sometimes the private forums are used in a bad way, and it affects things here. jmho


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #788 12/31/08 -
Post by: texasmom on December 31, 2008, 08:05:11 PM

klaasend
Administrator
Monkey All Star
*
Online Online
Posts: 45530
View Profile WWW   
Re: Natalee Case Discussion #788 12/31/08 -
« Reply #43 on: Today at 12:17:40 PM »

Klassend is correct in that Dave has Mark Purcell checking out what Caps tells Dave.

WTF?? Why in the hell would Dave do that? SCARY!!  Dave needs to get his head outta his ass!!

I agree!


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #788 12/31/08 -
Post by: SunnyinTX on December 31, 2008, 08:07:15 PM
I just don't understand why people like Mum and Lalas & idstlou and
all of the former posters here are so angry.
Anybody who reads all of this information should see the
truth to it.  They are nitpicking at the least little word.

Why are they so mad about it all?

I'll one up you with a question here.........

why are some at that site saying that JUG knew the MAIN goal of the Persistence for that trip was oil related?

 ::MonkeyConfused:: ::MonkeyConfused::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #788 12/31/08 -
Post by: Nut44x4 on December 31, 2008, 08:07:36 PM

Ummm, are these posts written by the same person?  The second post contains parts that are more literate than the first post.  Almost like the second post is written by someone who has a good grasp of the English language, but is purposely trying to disguise that.


And THAT my friends is why I have had my own issues w/ Caps from the beginning. The mannerisms/typing/speech/etc. are never the same. I won't get into a huge spew over it, but I noticed it early on, mentioned it a couple of times...it bothers me .


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #788 12/31/08 -
Post by: texasmom on December 31, 2008, 08:09:42 PM
I just don't understand why people like Mum and Lalas & idstlou and
all of the former posters here are so angry.
Anybody who reads all of this information should see the
truth to it.  They are nitpicking at the least little word.

Why are they so mad about it all?





Hi Mags, Happy New Year!

I will stick my neck out and speak for myself and please don't look at this as a drive by.  The reason that I am no longer posting has absolutely nothing to do with what I think of the cage or Kyle.  I am no longer posting because I was attacked for asking a very sincere question a few weeks ago, and I sure didn't see anyone else trying to diffuse the attack.  I asked whether Freebirds was the site where Kyle had given Kermit his information.  I also asked why the other Freebirds had left Kermit to reveal all of this alone like a sacrificial lamb or a pinata.  Kermit even responded with a photograph of Lambchops.  One person in particular told me to go back to the forum where that question had originated.  Well, that question originated in my head and as a matter of fact, the question has now answered itself with the emergence of several Freebirds.  So, why was I attacked?  I know that many people on SM belong to additional forums, some of which are private.  Why am I being attacked because I am a member at C&G?  That doesn't mean that I am less of a member at SM.  I don't want to be told where I can participate and I don't want to be ridiculed or insulted because I belong to other forums.  I am not spewing lies about anyone or anything, although it is being said that C&G is doing this.  I have contributed a lot to SM and it has been a labor of love, but I guess I just don't feel comfortable now and I don't want to be attacked. I am so upset by what I see happening here at SM and I really do care about the other monkeys.

Any mod,
Do I respond to this?  She is starting it again.  She was never ATTACKED and she knows it.  This is ridiculous.  We were told to end it then, and we did.  

bump


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #788 12/31/08 -
Post by: AZSunny on December 31, 2008, 08:11:27 PM

Ummm, are these posts written by the same person?  The second post contains parts that are more literate than the first post.  Almost like the second post is written by someone who has a good grasp of the English language, but is purposely trying to disguise that.


And THAT my friends is why I have had my own issues w/ Caps from the beginning. The mannerisms/typing/speech/etc. are never the same. I won't get into a huge spew over it, but I noticed it early on, mentioned it a couple of times...it bothers me .

Remeber the group early on  in 2005 that had about 5 people posting under "Bondia"  I think that was the name. Renfro was one of them.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #788 12/31/08 -
Post by: klaasend on December 31, 2008, 08:11:36 PM
Texasmom - I already responded to SS, it would probably be best if you leave it at that.  I won't allow this to escalate. 

I know ******* and Destiny will do their best to stir people up to cause trouble here. 


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #788 12/31/08 -
Post by: klaasend on December 31, 2008, 08:12:56 PM

Ummm, are these posts written by the same person?  The second post contains parts that are more literate than the first post.  Almost like the second post is written by someone who has a good grasp of the English language, but is purposely trying to disguise that.


And THAT my friends is why I have had my own issues w/ Caps from the beginning. The mannerisms/typing/speech/etc. are never the same. I won't get into a huge spew over it, but I noticed it early on, mentioned it a couple of times...it bothers me .

Remeber the group early on  in 2005 that had about 5 people posting under "Bondia"  I think that was the name. Renfro was one of them.

Yes then it ended up being only Renfro and that's when she was finally banned.  She went from being Bondia at SM to being Glenda at RU.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #788 12/31/08 -
Post by: Anna on December 31, 2008, 08:13:11 PM
I just don't understand why people like Mum and Lalas & idstlou and
all of the former posters here are so angry.
Anybody who reads all of this information should see the
truth to it.  They are nitpicking at the least little word.

Why are they so mad about it all?

I'll one up you with a question here.........

why are some at that site saying that JUG knew the MAIN goal of the Persistence for that trip was oil related?

 ::MonkeyConfused:: ::MonkeyConfused::


You mean we were asked to subsidize this with our little donations we scraped together in effort to have all the sites checked?  I am glad I only sent to TES but nevertheless, we were asked.

Is it ethical to use a missing person for financial opportunities?

However, this may not even be true at all.  Must always consider the sources.



Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #788 12/31/08 -
Post by: MuffyBee on December 31, 2008, 08:14:33 PM

Ummm, are these posts written by the same person?  The second post contains parts that are more literate than the first post.  Almost like the second post is written by someone who has a good grasp of the English language, but is purposely trying to disguise that.


And THAT my friends is why I have had my own issues w/ Caps from the beginning. The mannerisms/typing/speech/etc. are never the same. I won't get into a huge spew over it, but I noticed it early on, mentioned it a couple of times...it bothers me .

Remeber the group early on  in 2005 that had about 5 people posting under "Bondia"  I think that was the name. Renfro was one of them.

Oh yes.  I remember that quite well.  At first I thought maybe someone had a personality disorder, but it became quite apparent there were multiple uses of that nic/identity.  Ewww...Renho


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #788 12/31/08 -
Post by: Magnolia on December 31, 2008, 08:15:02 PM
I just don't understand why people like Mum and Lalas & idstlou and
all of the former posters here are so angry.
Anybody who reads all of this information should see the
truth to it.  They are nitpicking at the least little word.

Why are they so mad about it all?




Hi Mags, Happy New Year!

I will stick my neck out and speak for myself and please don't look at this as a drive by.  The reason that I am no longer posting has absolutely nothing to do with what I think of the cage or Kyle.  I am no longer posting because I was attacked for asking a very sincere question a few weeks ago, and I sure didn't see anyone else trying to diffuse the attack.  I asked whether Freebirds was the site where Kyle had given Kermit his information.  I also asked why the other Freebirds had left Kermit to reveal all of this alone like a sacrificial lamb or a pinata.  Kermit even responded with a photograph of Lambchops.  One person in particular told me to go back to the forum where that question had originated.  Well, that question originated in my head and as a matter of fact, the question has now answered itself with the emergence of several Freebirds.  So, why was I attacked?  I know that many people on SM belong to additional forums, some of which are private.  Why am I being attacked because I am a member at C&G?  That doesn't mean that I am less of a member at SM.  I don't want to be told where I can participate and I don't want to be ridiculed or insulted because I belong to other forums.  I am not spewing lies about anyone or anything, although it is being said that C&G is doing this.  I have contributed a lot to SM and it has been a labor of love, but I guess I just don't feel comfortable now and I don't want to be attacked. I am so upset by what I see happening here at SM and I really do care about the other monkeys.


Hi SS,
I am so glad to see you.  I miss you here.
I remember the incident you are speaking of SS.
I don't remember who it was that told you to go back to the other forum.
I can't count on both hand all of the times that I have been
attacked here.  Doesn't bother me a whole lot.  It happens.
I think that what you are upset about here is coming from a
few people who come here with an agenda to disrupt.  Most of
us who are still here are peaceful people with only one goal and
that is to try to find a way to bring Natalee's remains home.
God Bless you and Happy New Year.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #788 12/31/08 -
Post by: billb's daughter on December 31, 2008, 08:15:18 PM

klaasend
Administrator
Monkey All Star
*
Online Online
Posts: 45530
View Profile WWW   
Re: Natalee Case Discussion #788 12/31/08 -
« Reply #43 on: Today at 12:17:40 PM »

Klassend is correct in that Dave has Mark Purcell checking out what Caps tells Dave.








And that, in and of itself, is horribly, horribly frightening!

Questions were posted back in February I think.  Who was the "leak".  IMO the leak is coming direct from Dave Holloway via Robin and Mark Purcell.  Sorry to say but that's how I feel.

the leak is coming via Kath and Caps to Dave to Mark. Case closed. Mark to ALE. ALE to Silvetti. Silvetti to Jossy.

what a tangled mess.

Janet said it best - the chance was most likely lost forever.
Rob,
I'm pretty dense....what do you think Jossy's agenda is?


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #788 12/31/08 -
Post by: SunnyinTX on December 31, 2008, 08:15:25 PM
we know Kyle is working for StatoilHydro, AGR Drilling, Fugro Norway

Ormen Lange Excavation - North SeaOrmen Lange deep sea pipeline excavation monitoring with Oceaneering Magnum ROV and high-resolution multibeam sonar. StatoilHydro, AGR Drilling, Fugro Norway
Posted by Kyle Kingman at 4:43 PMhttp://geosolutions.blogspot.com/2008/07/ormen-lange-excavation-north-sea-norway.html

HIS FIRST STOP WHEN HE GOT TO OSLO WAS AT FUGRO NORWAY

I got off at Skoeyen (Skøyen) station, on the outskirts of Oslo, where I met up with Knut. He took me across the street from the train station to Fugro Norway headquarters

FUGRO IS IN AMSTERDAM - A DUTCH COMPANY
another Dutch connection.

FUGRO HAD DONE ALL THE MAPPING OF THE OCEAN FLOOR SO THAT HYDRO COULD DECIDE WHAT ROUTE TO TAKE THE PIPELINE

Fugro Survey has mapped 5000km of pipeline route alternatives from Norway's Ormen Lange field to shore under a frame agreement contract with Norsk Hydro. The surveys, off the west coast of Norway between Aalesund and Kristiansund, were over 10 likely routes in difficult topographic areas through many islands and shallow areas.

Fugro's survey vessel Geo Scanner used a Simrad EM1002 precision multibeam echo sounder to achieve optimum depth accuracy. A five-person onboard team processed and interpreted survey results and transmitted these ashore to enable Norsk Hydro to make key routing decisions as the surveys progressed. For more information, E-mail Phil Meaden, Fugro Survey Ltd, Aberdeen at pmeaden@fugrosurvey.co.uk
http://www.e-pageads.com/survey-marketplace/newsletter/newsletter20.html


ALTHOUGH HE HAD HAD JUST HAD A PHYSICAL THAT QUALIFIED HIM FOR WORKING IN THE THE NORTH SEA, HE NOW HAD TO GET ONE THAT QUALIFIED HIM FOR WORKING IN THE NORWEGIAN SECTION

Once there, I set my bags down and caught a taxi to the Reiseklinikken, where I met Dr. Hasle. Even though I just got a UKOOA physical that qualified me for the North Sea, I needed an addition to the physical that qualified me for the Norwegian sector of the North Sea
HE THEN FLEW TO KRISTIANSUND AND MET UP WITH THE SHIP THE ISLAND VALIANT
We boarded a small twin turbo-prop plane and flew a little over an hour north from Oslo to a town called Kristiansund
The boat is called the Island Valiant. It's a 296 ft (90.4m) long support vessel built in 2007

THE ISLAND VALIANT HAD BEEN CONTRACTED BY AGR SUBSEA TO CARRY OUT THE DEEP WATER EXCAVATION WORK
November 5, 2007

Seabrokers reports that Island Offshore's UT 787LCD Island Valiant has been contracted by AGR Subsea AS to carry out deep water excavation work on the Ormen Lange Southern Field Development Project in June next year.

KYLE'S ROLE INVOLVED DOING THE TWO WEAKEST OPERATIONAL AREAS HE HAS, WHICH THE CLIENT WAS WELL AWARE OF BEFORE THE JOB. HE IS USED TO BE VERY COMFORTABLE IN THE WORK HE DOES, HAVING A HIGH COMMAND OF EXPERTISE. BUT HERE HE'S COMPLETELY OUT OF HIS COMFORT ZONE AND OUT OF HIS EXPERTISE

My role is to take the pre installation data and calculate how much volume of material is to be removed and from where it should be removed, then once trenched, calculate how much material was removed so the installation can be conducted and evaluate the route This role involves large amounts of multi-beam sonar processing and AutoCAD work. This is the two weakest operational areas I have, which the client was well aware of before the job. However, within the first few days I got up to speed of where I needed to be and things are starting to get under control, but the pressure is certainly on. This project is stretching me, but I'm learning a lot.
I am used to being very comfortable in the work I do, having a high command over my expertise. Here, I am completely out of my comfort zone and out of my expertise.


ONE NIGHT A LOW-PROFILE WORK VESSEL WAS OPERATING WITHIN A MILE OF THEM, AND THE OFFSHORE PROJECT MANAGER, JOHN HAD TOLD HIM THERE RECENTLY 18 PEOPLE HAD DROWNED WHEN THE SAME BOAT SANK

Last night, a long low-profile work vessel was operating within a mile of our vessel.
The offshore project manager, John  told me that recently 18 people drowned on that same boat when it sank

AFTER FINISHING THE JOB, HE FLEW TO OSLO TO THE CLIENTS MAIN OFFICE

This Tuesday morning we completed the job in the North Sea and were headed for Ulsteinvik, Norway for demobilization. The client was ecstaticAfter flying to Oslo, I checked into the Thon Hotel, which is located near the city center and King’s palace, a popular tourist hotspot.I took the train to the client’s main office where I was greeted by several bosses who gathered together and looked at me, a “geo”, as if I were a lone unicornfew rows made office is located in Oslo Norway
FUGRO NORWAY MAIN OFFICE IS LOCATED IN OSLO

AFTER A BRIEF MEETING, A DUTCH AGENT NAMED MARK TOBE TELLS HIM HE IS IMMEDIATELY NEEDED IN CAIRO, AND THAT HIS FLIGHT LEAVES IN FIVE HOURS SHOULD HE ACCEPT


After a brief productive meeting Knut walks in and hands me a phone. It’s a Dutch agent named Mark Tobe. He tells me I’m needed immediately in Cairo and that a driver will be waiting for me when I land. My flight leaves in 5 hours, should I accepthe arrives in Cairo to do a job that he doesn't know who the client is, what the job is, or even if he will be staying in each up to all the nose is they were not afraid to pay him a high price to get him there

HE ARRIVES IN CAIRO TO DO A JOB THAT HE DOESN'T KNOW WHO THE CLIENT IS, WHAT THE JOB IS, OR EVEN IF HE WILL STAY IN EGYPT. ALL HE KNOWS IS THAT THEY WERE NOT AFRAID TO PAY HIM A HIGH PRICE TO GET HIM THERE.

I was contacted about 12 hours earlier in Norway by a Dutch agent who needed me in Cairo ASAP and they were not afraid to pay a high price to get me here. All I know is there was to be a driver waiting for me. I don’t know who the client is, what the job is, what I’m doing in Egypt, or if I will even be staying in Egypt. Hmm… how do I fill out my customs card?

HE SAYS HE IS WORKING ON A SHIP WHICH IS AN EX-RUSSIAN KGB SPY VESSEL CALLED THE NAVIGATOR



Now, add the crew of an ex-Russian KGB spy vessel named the “Navigator” to the list who once during a routine expedition came across an ancient submerged pyramid in the Mediterranean

WHICH APPEARS TO BE THE FUGRO NAVIGATOR
IT IS REGISTERED TO FUGRO CHINA, BUT IT LOOKS LIKE YOU MUST GO THROUGH THE NETHERLANDS BRANCH TO USE IT


Address : Wanchai, China
с/о Fugro Marine Services B.V.: Dillenburgsingel 69, P.O. Box 136, 2260 AC Leidschendam, Netherlands

Moored/Anchored. FUGRO NAVIGATOR, Cargo, Moored/Anchored, 0, 146, ABU QIR, 5/31/2008 9:00:00 AM, 08/06/2008 00:10 · Χάρτης ...

syros-*******.aegean.gr/ais/datasheet.aspx?datasource=SHIPS_ CURRENT&alpha=F&language=_GR&ord...



FUGRO SAE WERE LOOKING TO HIRE PEOPLE TO WORK ON THAT SHIP


FSAE are seeking to employ a two Hydrographic Survey Party Chiefs to manage our Geophysical Survey Vessel “Fugro Navigator”. The position is mainly vessel-based working back to back with opposite number either project by project or by rotation although office based pre project and project reporting work will be required. The Party Chief is the Company representative in the field and is responsible for ensuring that the project is completed in accordance with the procedures and Client specifications and within the confines of the contract. The Party Chief is also responsible for ensuring that the results are presented in a professional, timely, and efficient manner
http://www.fugro.be/jobs/jobdetails.asp?item=1183


HE WAS APPARENTLY THERE ANALIZING WORK THAT HAD ALREADY BEEN DONEAND APPEARS TO BE LOOKING FOR OBSTACLES ON THE OCEAN FLOOR

Hardly a few minutes into the analysis of hundreds of miles of sonar data, a rather unassuming wispy tendril of backscatter drew my attention. It wasn’t real, but rather an out of range return from something subtle lying just beyond the sonar’s range drawing me on to look furtherThinking I might find another wreck, I chased the subtle wisp of acoustic return and headed east on an adjacent discarded sonar lineThen, barely visible above the mud-line, the unassuming skeletal wooden frame of a large potentially-ancient wreck came into view I found an undiscovered shipwreck the day before In 60m of water, out of nowhere juts a perfectly geometric dome. Located immediately by its side, is a smaller second mound about 1/10th the size. The proportion of their sizes is perfect. The sides of the mounds are perfectly flat and uniform, like the sides of a pyramid.These two structures have an identical alignment as the great pyramids when adjusted for the difference in precessional variation through time


I’ve been in Cairo now for sixteen days and I’ve fallen into a steady rhythm of work, sleep, and repetition. The project’s back is broken and the end is in sight

We’ve come across a 160ft high submerged structure in over 200ft of water. If man-made, it would support intelligent antediluvian Neolithic civilization existed and thrived for potentially thousands of years before popular academic opinion would suggestIf it is a positive side, the structure will be left untouched

Although the effort will be viewed by most as successful, I will look back at it as partially repugnant and he moves on to another project in egypt
Once this project is completed, I will move on to a new one currently mobilizing near El Alamein, west of Alexandria, Egypt


#157 on: March 01, 2008, 10:52:05 PM observerQuote from: LegallyLex on March 01, 2008, 07:08:11 PM

Please do not take this as defeat. Please continue to try and raise the funds so that another boat with an ROV can come in and look at those targets. As of this date and time, it just cannot be the Persistence. And trust me when I say the Persistence and crew definitely wanted to be the ones to bring Natalee home to her family.
http://scaredmonkeys.net/index.php?topic=2438.140

#13 on: July 11, 2008, 02:18:24 PM Destiny

Another tid-bit from Margaret W...when I brought up the Persistence...she said that she recieved no info about them leaving...nor any info regarding their investigation....whey she inquired as to what was going on the OM told her that the persistence was done...had left...and was *not* coming back...she would like some info proving otherwise...
Destiny
http://scaredmonkeys.net/index.php?topic=3045.msg398199#msg398199



THERE APPEARS TO BE AT LEAST 4 PROJECTS GEOLAB AND FUGRO HAD WORKED ON IN COMMON
Fugro Houston office

http://www.geolab.it/geolab_eng/geoLay_progetti.html
----------------------------------------------------------------------

HE HAS WORKED FOR FUGRO MIDEAST BEFORE

QA/QC Geophysical Engineer for project Falcon-2, Fugro Survey (Middle East) Alcatel and Flag telecoms. FO Submarine telecommunication network route survey, assessment, and reporting; cable route from Arabian Sea, to Muscat, Dubai, Abu Dhabi, Doha, Manama, Kuwait and other landings.


Holy Crap....did a curtain just go up or what!!  HOLY CRAP!!!


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #788 12/31/08 -
Post by: Nut44x4 on December 31, 2008, 08:16:00 PM
(http://bestsmileys.com/movingeyes/3.gif)

 ::MonkeyHaHa::  ::MonkeyCool::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #788 12/31/08 -
Post by: texasmom on December 31, 2008, 08:16:50 PM
Texasmom - I already responded to SS, it would probably be best if you leave it at that.  I won't allow this to escalate. 

I know ******* and Destiny will do their best to stir people up to cause trouble here. 

Thanks Klaas, I agree.  The manner of speech then and now is far too familiar.  

I think I'll take a break, be back later.  ::MonkeyWink::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #788 12/31/08 -
Post by: billb's daughter on December 31, 2008, 08:18:11 PM
Hi Mum!I'll be awaiting your post regarding me stirring the pot and what my reasoning is for?? ::MonkeyDance:: ::MonkeyDance:: ::MonkeyDance::

Keepthefaith

Have you been baaaad ... veeeery veeeery baaaad?

 ::MonkeyHaHa::

Youngest son and Dutch American wife are attending a family union in Seattle tomorrow ... you nic of the woods.  If the noise gets too loud ... please don't call the police.  Just drop in.  Those Dutch relatives know how to party without a drop of alcohol and ... they are very welcomingl.

Happy New Year

Janet



 ::MonkeyLaugh:: Couldn't tell ya.For some reason it coordinates with Nov 18th.Something must have happened on that date but i'm unaware of what!Maybe Joran in thailand?I don't know??Just a Monkey from Seattle that would like to see JUSTICE FOR NATALEE SERVED...If that's stirrin the pot i got both hands on the spoon!  ::MonkeyDance::

Hope all is well in the Fraser Valley?Gonna stay in and safe down in Washington..
Kermit, is it too much of a stretch to conclude/have strong suspicions that John S. and now kyle are reaping rewards for keeping silent and playing ball with the powers that be in aruba?


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #788 12/31/08 -
Post by: Nut44x4 on December 31, 2008, 08:19:23 PM
Betcha Joran's got CRABS

If this is true and he is still in Thailand then he may just have Crispy Critters now.
http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2008/12/31/world/main4694580.shtml
New Year's Club Fire Kills 59 In Bangkok
Foreigners Among The Dead As Blaze Sweeps Through Posh Nightclub Jammed With Hundreds
Comments 1
BANGKOK, Thailand, Dec. 31, 2008


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #788 12/31/08 -
Post by: billb's daughter on December 31, 2008, 08:24:12 PM
Hi Mum!I'll be awaiting your post regarding me stirring the pot and what my reasoning is for?? ::MonkeyDance:: ::MonkeyDance:: ::MonkeyDance::

Keepthefaith

Have you been baaaad ... veeeery veeeery baaaad?

 ::MonkeyHaHa::

Youngest son and Dutch American wife are attending a family union in Seattle tomorrow ... you nic of the woods.  If the noise gets too loud ... please don't call the police.  Just drop in.  Those Dutch relatives know how to party without a drop of alcohol and ... they are very welcomingl.

Happy New Year

Janet



Janet, you and veggie have a blast and party down!
Happy New Year to you and your family, may they all be blessed.



Hey Kermit

We will be out for the evening ... however you, Miss Piggy and friends can have the use of the heated pond at the back of the property.  Just rub your little hind legs together and ... the little Japanese lanterns outlining the pond will automatically turn on.  If Miss Piggy claps her two front feet ... it will also activate those little lights.  Have fun my friend!

Happy New Year.

Janet
Now THAT's Funny...I don't care who you are...THAT'S FUNNY...complements of Larry, the Cable Guy....


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #788 12/31/08 -
Post by: SunnyinTX on December 31, 2008, 08:27:39 PM



Ummm, are these posts written by the same person?  The second post contains parts that are more literate than the first post.  Almost like the second post is written by someone who has a good grasp of the English language, but is purposely trying to disguise that.


I was thinking the same thing....IMO not written by CAPS.....I could never understand most of what he wrote and finally gave up trying


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #788 12/31/08 -
Post by: SS on December 31, 2008, 08:31:06 PM
I just don't understand why people like Mum and Lalas & idstlou and
all of the former posters here are so angry.
Anybody who reads all of this information should see the
truth to it.  They are nitpicking at the least little word.

Why are they so mad about it all?




Hi Mags, Happy New Year!

I will stick my neck out and speak for myself and please don't look at this as a drive by.  The reason that I am no longer posting has absolutely nothing to do with what I think of the cage or Kyle.  I am no longer posting because I was attacked for asking a very sincere question a few weeks ago, and I sure didn't see anyone else trying to diffuse the attack.  I asked whether Freebirds was the site where Kyle had given Kermit his information.  I also asked why the other Freebirds had left Kermit to reveal all of this alone like a sacrificial lamb or a pinata.  Kermit even responded with a photograph of Lambchops.  One person in particular told me to go back to the forum where that question had originated.  Well, that question originated in my head and as a matter of fact, the question has now answered itself with the emergence of several Freebirds.  So, why was I attacked?  I know that many people on SM belong to additional forums, some of which are private.  Why am I being attacked because I am a member at C&G?  That doesn't mean that I am less of a member at SM.  I don't want to be told where I can participate and I don't want to be ridiculed or insulted because I belong to other forums.  I am not spewing lies about anyone or anything, although it is being said that C&G is doing this.  I have contributed a lot to SM and it has been a labor of love, but I guess I just don't feel comfortable now and I don't want to be attacked. I am so upset by what I see happening here at SM and I really do care about the other monkeys.

Hello SS and Happy New Year!I've been told today that i'm stirring the pot.Isn't asking questions how we get to the TRUTH??It's OK to agree to disagree.We are all Monkey's.



Thank you and Happy New Year to you also.  I recall  New Year's Eve in Seattle!!!


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #788 12/31/08 -
Post by: texasmom on December 31, 2008, 08:31:59 PM



Ummm, are these posts written by the same person?  The second post contains parts that are more literate than the first post.  Almost like the second post is written by someone who has a good grasp of the English language, but is purposely trying to disguise that.


I was thinking the same thing....IMO not written by CAPS.....I could never understand most of what he wrote and finally gave up trying

SunnyinTx,
I did receive a response, a definite no on posting the logic report; I think a no too on the dates.  I wasn't sure on that part so I sent another email and asked specifically about that but I haven't heard back.  


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #788 12/31/08 -
Post by: wreck on December 31, 2008, 08:33:01 PM

Ummm, are these posts written by the same person?  The second post contains parts that are more literate than the first post.  Almost like the second post is written by someone who has a good grasp of the English language, but is purposely trying to disguise that.


And THAT my friends is why I have had my own issues w/ Caps from the beginning. The mannerisms/typing/speech/etc. are never the same. I won't get into a huge spew over it, but I noticed it early on, mentioned it a couple of times...it bothers me .

Remeber the group early on  in 2005 that had about 5 people posting under "Bondia"  I think that was the name. Renfro was one of them.

Oh yes.  I remember that quite well.  At first I thought maybe someone had a personality disorder, but it became quite apparent there were multiple uses of that nic/identity.  Ewww...Renho
In the early days, I posted at RWV only. When a few of us would start to put 2 + 2 together about anything -- about 3 nics would come on and "talk to one another" until it was impossible to talk about the case. I am certain it was one person only talking.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #788 12/31/08 -
Post by: billb's daughter on December 31, 2008, 08:35:21 PM

Ummm, are these posts written by the same person?  The second post contains parts that are more literate than the first post.  Almost like the second post is written by someone who has a good grasp of the English language, but is purposely trying to disguise that.


And THAT my friends is why I have had my own issues w/ Caps from the beginning. The mannerisms/typing/speech/etc. are never the same. I won't get into a huge spew over it, but I noticed it early on, mentioned it a couple of times...it bothers me .
Kermit said CAPS has many computers......maybe many CAPS? ::MonkeyCool::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #788 12/31/08 -
Post by: SunnyinTX on December 31, 2008, 08:36:46 PM

Ummm, are these posts written by the same person?  The second post contains parts that are more literate than the first post.  Almost like the second post is written by someone who has a good grasp of the English language, but is purposely trying to disguise that.


And THAT my friends is why I have had my own issues w/ Caps from the beginning. The mannerisms/typing/speech/etc. are never the same. I won't get into a huge spew over it, but I noticed it early on, mentioned it a couple of times...it bothers me .

Remeber the group early on  in 2005 that had about 5 people posting under "Bondia"  I think that was the name. Renfro was one of them.

Yes then it ended up being only Renfro and that's when she was finally banned.  She went from being Bondia at SM to being Glenda at RU.

your fergot to RENHO!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! last and final!! ::MonkeyWink::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #788 12/31/08 -
Post by: Lifesong on December 31, 2008, 08:38:07 PM
Taken from last thread:

Sent to me by Natalee's Freebirds:

Please feel free (if you'd like) to post this at your board.
 
During the journey of the Persistence to Aruba, Kyle reached out and emailed with us.  During that time, one of the questions posed to him was regarding protocol if/when Natalee's remains were found.
 
Kyle's response was that he was unsure, but felt that would be settled before the search began.
 
The cautions were given to him about the lack of integrity on the part of Aruba's law enforcement, prosecutor's office, and its judiciary.
 
Contact with Kyle continued throughout the duration of the search by the Persistence.
 
Once back home, Kyle asked us for our help.  He was very concerned about the activities that transpired during their search - specifically surrounding the find of the fishing cage and its contents.  Kyle wanted our help in presenting this information in a factual way, to then be given to Natalee's family.
 
This was March 18, 2008.  At that time, Kyle assured us he had just recently sent the images from the Dec 30th and Jan 7th dives to the FBI, but had never received a response from them.
 
We later found that to be false.
 
Also at that time, Beth's brother saw the images Kyle had shared with us - but none of the detail he shared later.

We compiled the images Kyle presented us, along with his opinions and the facts surrounding the sequence of events regarding that fishing cage.  Kyle stated he would be getting in touch with Beth Holloway.
 
We later found out that never happened.

At this time, Kyle shared with us the broadcast networks he had approached in February, in an attempt to sell these images to the highest bidder.
 
This didn't concern us greatly at that time - as we were under the impression US law enforcement and Natalee's family had already been made aware of their find.
 
Approximately May 2008 Kyle began dodging questions for details (we had asked for names of Aruban police and divers to be included in our documentation of these events), hedging on moving forward with this, and then he completely disappeared from our board.
 
During that time, we learned Kyle had never contacted Beth, or Dave, or the FBI with this information.
 
We put our original plan into motion - that of presenting this information in a clear and concise manner, and we sent it to Beth Holloway.
 
Beth was disturbed, needed time to digest the information, and wanted to share it with someone she trusts.
 
When Tim Miller was returning to Aruba this past fall, Beth gave us permission to release this information publicly.
 
At that point, we gave it to John Kelly, Carmen Adams with the FBI, and got it ready for public consumption.
 
The next step was to publish this information at our blog.
 
One of our members felt we were betraying Kyle in doing so, contacted him, and he re-surfaced at our site with threats of litigation against us - stating this was his "intellectual property" and we could not use it.
 
That of course concerned us greatly - as none of us could afford to be sued.
 
He also stated at that time, Luis Shaefer had just recently sold the rights of the video of these images to a broadcast company for the purposes of a documentary.
 
We contacted legal counsel and were advised to keep our distance from any Persistence crew member, in the face of potential obstruction/accessory charges.
 
At this point, one of our members decided to brace for the possibility of civil litigation, resigned from our membership to protect it from same, and posted what he knows to be factual at SM.
 
Kyle did tell us human remains were found in that fish cage.
 
Kyle did tell us about John Silvetti's intent to open an office on the island of Aruba, to enable him ease in conducting business in South America, and Aruba.
 
Kyle also told us of John's absolute refusal to give that fish cage and its contents any credence - before even it was inspected on Jan 7th.
 
Kyle told us in no uncertain terms that Tim Miller and Dateline were abruptly removed from the Persistence on Dec 30, resulting in only Persistence crew being aboard between that date and the Jan 7 dive of the Arubans.
 
Nothing that was posted at SM by kermit was incorrect, out of context, or in any way false.
 
Regards,
 
Former Natalee's Freebirds Administrator
Natalee and her family deserve justice - and we will not let up until they have it!

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------


OMG, I just got home and found I am 1 1/2 threads behind.  Gambling in Tunica MS was worth the trip but now I have to read 1 1/2 threads to catch up.

Just to be clear: 

Tim Miller did not disembark the Persistence on December 30th at the request of Dave Holloway in order to chase down a lead in Nicaraqua. 

He was removed from the Persistence at the sole discretion of John Silvetti over a disagreement.

Have I got that right?


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #788 12/31/08 -
Post by: billb's daughter on December 31, 2008, 08:39:23 PM
we know Kyle is working for StatoilHydro, AGR Drilling, Fugro Norway

Ormen Lange Excavation - North SeaOrmen Lange deep sea pipeline excavation monitoring with Oceaneering Magnum ROV and high-resolution multibeam sonar. StatoilHydro, AGR Drilling, Fugro Norway
Posted by Kyle Kingman at 4:43 PMhttp://geosolutions.blogspot.com/2008/07/ormen-lange-excavation-north-sea-norway.html

HIS FIRST STOP WHEN HE GOT TO OSLO WAS AT FUGRO NORWAY

I got off at Skoeyen (Skøyen) station, on the outskirts of Oslo, where I met up with Knut. He took me across the street from the train station to Fugro Norway headquarters

FUGRO IS IN AMSTERDAM - A DUTCH COMPANY
another Dutch connection.

FUGRO HAD DONE ALL THE MAPPING OF THE OCEAN FLOOR SO THAT HYDRO COULD DECIDE WHAT ROUTE TO TAKE THE PIPELINE

Fugro Survey has mapped 5000km of pipeline route alternatives from Norway's Ormen Lange field to shore under a frame agreement contract with Norsk Hydro. The surveys, off the west coast of Norway between Aalesund and Kristiansund, were over 10 likely routes in difficult topographic areas through many islands and shallow areas.

Fugro's survey vessel Geo Scanner used a Simrad EM1002 precision multibeam echo sounder to achieve optimum depth accuracy. A five-person onboard team processed and interpreted survey results and transmitted these ashore to enable Norsk Hydro to make key routing decisions as the surveys progressed. For more information, E-mail Phil Meaden, Fugro Survey Ltd, Aberdeen at pmeaden@fugrosurvey.co.uk
http://www.e-pageads.com/survey-marketplace/newsletter/newsletter20.html


ALTHOUGH HE HAD HAD JUST HAD A PHYSICAL THAT QUALIFIED HIM FOR WORKING IN THE THE NORTH SEA, HE NOW HAD TO GET ONE THAT QUALIFIED HIM FOR WORKING IN THE NORWEGIAN SECTION

Once there, I set my bags down and caught a taxi to the Reiseklinikken, where I met Dr. Hasle. Even though I just got a UKOOA physical that qualified me for the North Sea, I needed an addition to the physical that qualified me for the Norwegian sector of the North Sea
HE THEN FLEW TO KRISTIANSUND AND MET UP WITH THE SHIP THE ISLAND VALIANT
We boarded a small twin turbo-prop plane and flew a little over an hour north from Oslo to a town called Kristiansund
The boat is called the Island Valiant. It's a 296 ft (90.4m) long support vessel built in 2007

THE ISLAND VALIANT HAD BEEN CONTRACTED BY AGR SUBSEA TO CARRY OUT THE DEEP WATER EXCAVATION WORK
November 5, 2007

Seabrokers reports that Island Offshore's UT 787LCD Island Valiant has been contracted by AGR Subsea AS to carry out deep water excavation work on the Ormen Lange Southern Field Development Project in June next year.

KYLE'S ROLE INVOLVED DOING THE TWO WEAKEST OPERATIONAL AREAS HE HAS, WHICH THE CLIENT WAS WELL AWARE OF BEFORE THE JOB. HE IS USED TO BE VERY COMFORTABLE IN THE WORK HE DOES, HAVING A HIGH COMMAND OF EXPERTISE. BUT HERE HE'S COMPLETELY OUT OF HIS COMFORT ZONE AND OUT OF HIS EXPERTISE

My role is to take the pre installation data and calculate how much volume of material is to be removed and from where it should be removed, then once trenched, calculate how much material was removed so the installation can be conducted and evaluate the route This role involves large amounts of multi-beam sonar processing and AutoCAD work. This is the two weakest operational areas I have, which the client was well aware of before the job. However, within the first few days I got up to speed of where I needed to be and things are starting to get under control, but the pressure is certainly on. This project is stretching me, but I'm learning a lot.
I am used to being very comfortable in the work I do, having a high command over my expertise. Here, I am completely out of my comfort zone and out of my expertise.


ONE NIGHT A LOW-PROFILE WORK VESSEL WAS OPERATING WITHIN A MILE OF THEM, AND THE OFFSHORE PROJECT MANAGER, JOHN HAD TOLD HIM THERE RECENTLY 18 PEOPLE HAD DROWNED WHEN THE SAME BOAT SANK

Last night, a long low-profile work vessel was operating within a mile of our vessel.
The offshore project manager, John  told me that recently 18 people drowned on that same boat when it sank

AFTER FINISHING THE JOB, HE FLEW TO OSLO TO THE CLIENTS MAIN OFFICE

This Tuesday morning we completed the job in the North Sea and were headed for Ulsteinvik, Norway for demobilization. The client was ecstaticAfter flying to Oslo, I checked into the Thon Hotel, which is located near the city center and King’s palace, a popular tourist hotspot.I took the train to the client’s main office where I was greeted by several bosses who gathered together and looked at me, a “geo”, as if I were a lone unicornfew rows made office is located in Oslo Norway
FUGRO NORWAY MAIN OFFICE IS LOCATED IN OSLO

AFTER A BRIEF MEETING, A DUTCH AGENT NAMED MARK TOBE TELLS HIM HE IS IMMEDIATELY NEEDED IN CAIRO, AND THAT HIS FLIGHT LEAVES IN FIVE HOURS SHOULD HE ACCEPT


After a brief productive meeting Knut walks in and hands me a phone. It’s a Dutch agent named Mark Tobe. He tells me I’m needed immediately in Cairo and that a driver will be waiting for me when I land. My flight leaves in 5 hours, should I accepthe arrives in Cairo to do a job that he doesn't know who the client is, what the job is, or even if he will be staying in each up to all the nose is they were not afraid to pay him a high price to get him there

HE ARRIVES IN CAIRO TO DO A JOB THAT HE DOESN'T KNOW WHO THE CLIENT IS, WHAT THE JOB IS, OR EVEN IF HE WILL STAY IN EGYPT. ALL HE KNOWS IS THAT THEY WERE NOT AFRAID TO PAY HIM A HIGH PRICE TO GET HIM THERE.

I was contacted about 12 hours earlier in Norway by a Dutch agent who needed me in Cairo ASAP and they were not afraid to pay a high price to get me here. All I know is there was to be a driver waiting for me. I don’t know who the client is, what the job is, what I’m doing in Egypt, or if I will even be staying in Egypt. Hmm… how do I fill out my customs card?

HE SAYS HE IS WORKING ON A SHIP WHICH IS AN EX-RUSSIAN KGB SPY VESSEL CALLED THE NAVIGATOR



Now, add the crew of an ex-Russian KGB spy vessel named the “Navigator” to the list who once during a routine expedition came across an ancient submerged pyramid in the Mediterranean

WHICH APPEARS TO BE THE FUGRO NAVIGATOR
IT IS REGISTERED TO FUGRO CHINA, BUT IT LOOKS LIKE YOU MUST GO THROUGH THE NETHERLANDS BRANCH TO USE IT


Address : Wanchai, China
с/о Fugro Marine Services B.V.: Dillenburgsingel 69, P.O. Box 136, 2260 AC Leidschendam, Netherlands

Moored/Anchored. FUGRO NAVIGATOR, Cargo, Moored/Anchored, 0, 146, ABU QIR, 5/31/2008 9:00:00 AM, 08/06/2008 00:10 · Χάρτης ...

syros-*******.aegean.gr/ais/datasheet.aspx?datasource=SHIPS_ CURRENT&alpha=F&language=_GR&ord...



FUGRO SAE WERE LOOKING TO HIRE PEOPLE TO WORK ON THAT SHIP


FSAE are seeking to employ a two Hydrographic Survey Party Chiefs to manage our Geophysical Survey Vessel “Fugro Navigator”. The position is mainly vessel-based working back to back with opposite number either project by project or by rotation although office based pre project and project reporting work will be required. The Party Chief is the Company representative in the field and is responsible for ensuring that the project is completed in accordance with the procedures and Client specifications and within the confines of the contract. The Party Chief is also responsible for ensuring that the results are presented in a professional, timely, and efficient manner
http://www.fugro.be/jobs/jobdetails.asp?item=1183


HE WAS APPARENTLY THERE ANALIZING WORK THAT HAD ALREADY BEEN DONEAND APPEARS TO BE LOOKING FOR OBSTACLES ON THE OCEAN FLOOR

Hardly a few minutes into the analysis of hundreds of miles of sonar data, a rather unassuming wispy tendril of backscatter drew my attention. It wasn’t real, but rather an out of range return from something subtle lying just beyond the sonar’s range drawing me on to look furtherThinking I might find another wreck, I chased the subtle wisp of acoustic return and headed east on an adjacent discarded sonar lineThen, barely visible above the mud-line, the unassuming skeletal wooden frame of a large potentially-ancient wreck came into view I found an undiscovered shipwreck the day before In 60m of water, out of nowhere juts a perfectly geometric dome. Located immediately by its side, is a smaller second mound about 1/10th the size. The proportion of their sizes is perfect. The sides of the mounds are perfectly flat and uniform, like the sides of a pyramid.These two structures have an identical alignment as the great pyramids when adjusted for the difference in precessional variation through time


I’ve been in Cairo now for sixteen days and I’ve fallen into a steady rhythm of work, sleep, and repetition. The project’s back is broken and the end is in sight

We’ve come across a 160ft high submerged structure in over 200ft of water. If man-made, it would support intelligent antediluvian Neolithic civilization existed and thrived for potentially thousands of years before popular academic opinion would suggestIf it is a positive side, the structure will be left untouched

Although the effort will be viewed by most as successful, I will look back at it as partially repugnant and he moves on to another project in egypt
Once this project is completed, I will move on to a new one currently mobilizing near El Alamein, west of Alexandria, Egypt


#157 on: March 01, 2008, 10:52:05 PM observerQuote from: LegallyLex on March 01, 2008, 07:08:11 PM

Please do not take this as defeat. Please continue to try and raise the funds so that another boat with an ROV can come in and look at those targets. As of this date and time, it just cannot be the Persistence. And trust me when I say the Persistence and crew definitely wanted to be the ones to bring Natalee home to her family.
http://scaredmonkeys.net/index.php?topic=2438.140

#13 on: July 11, 2008, 02:18:24 PM Destiny

Another tid-bit from Margaret W...when I brought up the Persistence...she said that she recieved no info about them leaving...nor any info regarding their investigation....whey she inquired as to what was going on the OM told her that the persistence was done...had left...and was *not* coming back...she would like some info proving otherwise...
Destiny
http://scaredmonkeys.net/index.php?topic=3045.msg398199#msg398199



THERE APPEARS TO BE AT LEAST 4 PROJECTS GEOLAB AND FUGRO HAD WORKED ON IN COMMON
Fugro Houston office

http://www.geolab.it/geolab_eng/geoLay_progetti.html
----------------------------------------------------------------------

HE HAS WORKED FOR FUGRO MIDEAST BEFORE

QA/QC Geophysical Engineer for project Falcon-2, Fugro Survey (Middle East) Alcatel and Flag telecoms. FO Submarine telecommunication network route survey, assessment, and reporting; cable route from Arabian Sea, to Muscat, Dubai, Abu Dhabi, Doha, Manama, Kuwait and other landings.







Kermit, is it too much of a stretch to conclude/have strong suspicions that John S. and now kyle are reaping rewards for keeping silent and playing ball with the powers that be in aruba?


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #788 12/31/08 -
Post by: SunnyinTX on December 31, 2008, 08:40:12 PM



Ummm, are these posts written by the same person?  The second post contains parts that are more literate than the first post.  Almost like the second post is written by someone who has a good grasp of the English language, but is purposely trying to disguise that.


I was thinking the same thing....IMO not written by CAPS.....I could never understand most of what he wrote and finally gave up trying

SunnyinTx,
I did receive a response, a definite no on posting the logic report; I think a no too on the dates.  I wasn't sure on that part so I sent another email and asked specifically about that but I haven't heard back.  

Ok...and thanks!


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #788 12/31/08 -
Post by: SS on December 31, 2008, 08:43:04 PM
Texasmom - I already responded to SS, it would probably be best if you leave it at that.  I won't allow this to escalate. 

I know ******* and Destiny will do their best to stir people up to cause trouble here. 




Klaas -I have not been influenced by anyone to cause any kind of trouble here or anywhere else.  I have been quietly reading and I came across Magnolia's post.  I answered her post from my own perspective.  I don't understand why I am hearing that Destiny and ******* or C&G are behind my posts.  That sounds like I am not capable of making my own decisions or formulating my own thoughts.  I have no intention of debating TM at all and I never mentioned her name.  I have always enjoyed TM and I have enjoyed posting with her.  I have no idea why I have become her target.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #788 12/31/08 -
Post by: ospainter on December 31, 2008, 08:44:12 PM

Ummm, are these posts written by the same person?  The second post contains parts that are more literate than the first post.  Almost like the second post is written by someone who has a good grasp of the English language, but is purposely trying to disguise that.


And THAT my friends is why I have had my own issues w/ Caps from the beginning. The mannerisms/typing/speech/etc. are never the same. I won't get into a huge spew over it, but I noticed it early on, mentioned it a couple of times...it bothers me .

Remeber the group early on  in 2005 that had about 5 people posting under "Bondia"  I think that was the name. Renfro was one of them.

HI Sunny,

grrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrr, yes I remember..all too well......

Happy New Year Everyone

OS


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #788 12/31/08 -
Post by: Anna on December 31, 2008, 08:44:34 PM
Kermit, is it too much of a stretch to conclude/have strong suspicions that John S. and now kyle are reaping rewards for keeping silent and playing ball with the powers that be in aruba?


Well, Kyle may not be when John Silvetti reads all the things Kyle was saying about him, lol.

 ::MonkeyHaHa::



Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #788 12/31/08 -
Post by: klaasend on December 31, 2008, 08:45:23 PM
Texasmom - I already responded to SS, it would probably be best if you leave it at that.  I won't allow this to escalate. 

I know ******* and Destiny will do their best to stir people up to cause trouble here. 




Klaas -I have not been influenced by anyone to cause any kind of trouble here or anywhere else.  I have been quietly reading and I came across Magnolia's post.  I answered her post from my own perspective.  I don't understand why I am hearing that Destiny and ******* or C&G are behind my posts.  That sounds like I am not capable of making my own decisions or formulating my own thoughts.  I have no intention of debating TM at all and I never mentioned her name.  I have always enjoyed TM and I have enjoyed posting with her.  I have no idea why I have become her target.

You are not a target.  I did explain earlier tonight exactly why I have an issue with C&G and it has nothing to do with you. 


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #788 12/31/08 -
Post by: Blue Moon on December 31, 2008, 08:45:24 PM
I am only on page 21 of the last thread.  Thanks Jan for coming onboard.  I know I am missing lots here so it is important for me to keep reading.  thanks wingnut also.  Really I am in disbelief of what I am reading.  But Aruba MUST be made to own up to what has happened with Natalee.  I really don't know if that was her remains in the cage or not but the pressure has to be put on Aruba NOW to  answer this question.  It cannot go unasked any longer.  What about putting these pictures out to the media?


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #788 12/31/08 -
Post by: San on December 31, 2008, 08:45:24 PM
NONESUCHE, check your email.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #788 12/31/08 -
Post by: Keepthefaith on December 31, 2008, 08:46:08 PM
I just don't understand why people like Mum and Lalas & idstlou and
all of the former posters here are so angry.
Anybody who reads all of this information should see the
truth to it.  They are nitpicking at the least little word.

Why are they so mad about it all?




Hi Mags, Happy New Year!

I will stick my neck out and speak for myself and please don't look at this as a drive by.  The reason that I am no longer posting has absolutely nothing to do with what I think of the cage or Kyle.  I am no longer posting because I was attacked for asking a very sincere question a few weeks ago, and I sure didn't see anyone else trying to diffuse the attack.  I asked whether Freebirds was the site where Kyle had given Kermit his information.  I also asked why the other Freebirds had left Kermit to reveal all of this alone like a sacrificial lamb or a pinata.  Kermit even responded with a photograph of Lambchops.  One person in particular told me to go back to the forum where that question had originated.  Well, that question originated in my head and as a matter of fact, the question has now answered itself with the emergence of several Freebirds.  So, why was I attacked?  I know that many people on SM belong to additional forums, some of which are private.  Why am I being attacked because I am a member at C&G?  That doesn't mean that I am less of a member at SM.  I don't want to be told where I can participate and I don't want to be ridiculed or insulted because I belong to other forums.  I am not spewing lies about anyone or anything, although it is being said that C&G is doing this.  I have contributed a lot to SM and it has been a labor of love, but I guess I just don't feel comfortable now and I don't want to be attacked. I am so upset by what I see happening here at SM and I really do care about the other monkeys.

Hello SS and Happy New Year!I've been told today that i'm stirring the pot.Isn't asking questions how we get to the TRUTH??It's OK to agree to disagree.We are all Monkey's.



Thank you and Happy New Year to you also.  I recall  New Year's Eve in Seattle!!!

People love the Space Needle Fireworks!Me.I stay in and safe!Been a rough year for our sports up here in Seattle but that's OK.I've been on SM for about a year but took some time off then jumped back on.People have to understand to agree to disagree from my standpoint.Me personally.I see things being brought to the light from posters and others don't like that!Why?Many different reasons i would think but don't know.I for one see a concerted effort to discredit Kermit,as well as the other Freebirds who've turned up to speak freely.That's what is special about SM for me is the openness.Private Forums!Not my thing.If other people want to be a part of that it's OK with me.I trust Klaas as well as the Mods here at SM.Again.Nice to see you and let the TRUTH be told.....

KEEPTHEFAITH


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #788 12/31/08 -
Post by: klaasend on December 31, 2008, 08:46:10 PM

Ummm, are these posts written by the same person?  The second post contains parts that are more literate than the first post.  Almost like the second post is written by someone who has a good grasp of the English language, but is purposely trying to disguise that.


And THAT my friends is why I have had my own issues w/ Caps from the beginning. The mannerisms/typing/speech/etc. are never the same. I won't get into a huge spew over it, but I noticed it early on, mentioned it a couple of times...it bothers me .

Remeber the group early on  in 2005 that had about 5 people posting under "Bondia"  I think that was the name. Renfro was one of them.

HI Sunny,

grrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrr, yes I remember..all too well......

Happy New Year Everyone

OS

Hi Os- Happy New Year!


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #788 12/31/08 -
Post by: Artcolley on December 31, 2008, 08:46:44 PM
Happy New Year, Everyone!


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #788 12/31/08 -
Post by: texasmom on December 31, 2008, 08:48:44 PM


Happy New Year OsPainter and Artcolley, good to see you both!!!! 


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #788 12/31/08 -
Post by: texasmom on December 31, 2008, 08:51:18 PM

Ummm, are these posts written by the same person?  The second post contains parts that are more literate than the first post.  Almost like the second post is written by someone who has a good grasp of the English language, but is purposely trying to disguise that.


And THAT my friends is why I have had my own issues w/ Caps from the beginning. The mannerisms/typing/speech/etc. are never the same. I won't get into a huge spew over it, but I noticed it early on, mentioned it a couple of times...it bothers me .
Kermit said CAPS has many computers......maybe many CAPS? ::MonkeyCool::

I'm wondering if that might be too billb. 


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #788 12/31/08 -
Post by: SunnyinTX on December 31, 2008, 08:51:50 PM

Ummm, are these posts written by the same person?  The second post contains parts that are more literate than the first post.  Almost like the second post is written by someone who has a good grasp of the English language, but is purposely trying to disguise that.


And THAT my friends is why I have had my own issues w/ Caps from the beginning. The mannerisms/typing/speech/etc. are never the same. I won't get into a huge spew over it, but I noticed it early on, mentioned it a couple of times...it bothers me .

Remeber the group early on  in 2005 that had about 5 people posting under "Bondia"  I think that was the name. Renfro was one of them.

HI Sunny,

grrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrr, yes I remember..all too well......

Happy New Year Everyone

OS

OS is is really good to see you!!  ::MonkeyDance:: How are you doing??  I hate Renho............I know it's wrong to hate but it's the strongest word I can think of to describe how I feel about her :smt096


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #788 12/31/08 -
Post by: Artcolley on December 31, 2008, 08:51:53 PM


Happy New Year OsPainter and Artcolley, good to see you both!!!! 

Nice to see you too!  ::MonkeyRoll::



Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #788 12/31/08 -
Post by: San on December 31, 2008, 08:52:49 PM
Happy New Year, Everyone!

Hi Art, Happy New Year.

(http://i34.photobucket.com/albums/d118/Sanddrops/MonkeysRock.jpg)


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #788 12/31/08 -
Post by: SunnyinTX on December 31, 2008, 08:54:00 PM
Happy New Year, Everyone!

Hi Art!!  It's like old home week for me to see y'all!  ::MonkeyDance:: Happy New Year to all!


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #788 12/31/08 -
Post by: Anna on December 31, 2008, 08:54:05 PM
Happy New Year to All the Monkeys


http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4U9zXXRiTVA&feature=related


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #788 12/31/08 -
Post by: billb's daughter on December 31, 2008, 08:54:21 PM
Kermit, is it too much of a stretch to conclude/have strong suspicions that John S. and now kyle are reaping rewards for keeping silent and playing ball with the powers that be in aruba?


Well, Kyle may not be when John Silvetti reads all the things Kyle was saying about him, lol.

 ::MonkeyHaHa::


Anne....true, but John S isn't the only employer out there needing kyle's services....He apparently was hired (for big bucks) to do work he himself admits he's not the most qualified....through a dutch company...
makes me go Hmmmmm


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #788 12/31/08 -
Post by: Artcolley on December 31, 2008, 08:55:03 PM
Happy New Year, Everyone!

Hi Art, Happy New Year.

(http://i34.photobucket.com/albums/d118/Sanddrops/MonkeysRock.jpg)

Thank You, SAN and Same to You!!!!



Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #788 12/31/08 -
Post by: SS on December 31, 2008, 08:55:46 PM
Best wishes to everyone for a healthy and prosperous 2009.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #788 12/31/08 -
Post by: Keepthefaith on December 31, 2008, 08:55:53 PM
Kermit, is it too much of a stretch to conclude/have strong suspicions that John S. and now kyle are reaping rewards for keeping silent and playing ball with the powers that be in aruba?


Well, Kyle may not be when John Silvetti reads all the things Kyle was saying about him, lol.

 ::MonkeyHaHa::


Anne....true, but John S isn't the only employer out there needing kyle's services....He apparently was hired (for big bucks) to do work he himself admits he's not the most qualified....through a dutch company...
makes me go Hmmmmm

Time will tell won't it Billb!Be curious to see where Silvetti and Kyle end up in a year or two..


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #788 12/31/08 -
Post by: SunnyinTX on December 31, 2008, 08:56:24 PM
Happy New Year to All the Monkeys


http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4U9zXXRiTVA&feature=related

WOW...that was great....Happy New Year Anna!!


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #788 12/31/08 -
Post by: San on December 31, 2008, 08:57:26 PM
Happy New Year to All the Monkeys


http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4U9zXXRiTVA&feature=related

Happy New Year to you too Anna.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #788 12/31/08 -
Post by: San on December 31, 2008, 08:58:03 PM
Best wishes to everyone for a healthy and prosperous 2009.

Same to you SS.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #788 12/31/08 -
Post by: SunnyinTX on December 31, 2008, 08:58:45 PM
Best wishes to everyone for a healthy and prosperous 2009.

Same to you SS and I hope you stick around...it looks like things have been a bit touchy here in recent days...but I guess we all need to remember ...we all want the same thing....truth and justice for Natalee.....I am not sure there will ever be justice....but surely the truth is out there to be found....


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #788 12/31/08 -
Post by: texasmom on December 31, 2008, 08:59:32 PM
Happy New Year to All the Monkeys


http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4U9zXXRiTVA&feature=related


Happy New Year to you too!


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #788 12/31/08 -
Post by: billb's daughter on December 31, 2008, 09:00:47 PM
I just don't understand why people like Mum and Lalas & idstlou and
all of the former posters here are so angry.
Anybody who reads all of this information should see the
truth to it.  They are nitpicking at the least little word.

Why are they so mad about it all?




Hi Mags, Happy New Year!

I will stick my neck out and speak for myself and please don't look at this as a drive by.  The reason that I am no longer posting has absolutely nothing to do with what I think of the cage or Kyle.  I am no longer posting because I was attacked for asking a very sincere question a few weeks ago, and I sure didn't see anyone else trying to diffuse the attack.  I asked whether Freebirds was the site where Kyle had given Kermit his information.  I also asked why the other Freebirds had left Kermit to reveal all of this alone like a sacrificial lamb or a pinata.  Kermit even responded with a photograph of Lambchops.  One person in particular told me to go back to the forum where that question had originated.  Well, that question originated in my head and as a matter of fact, the question has now answered itself with the emergence of several Freebirds.  So, why was I attacked?  I know that many people on SM belong to additional forums, some of which are private.  Why am I being attacked because I am a member at C&G?  That doesn't mean that I am less of a member at SM.  I don't want to be told where I can participate and I don't want to be ridiculed or insulted because I belong to other forums.  I am not spewing lies about anyone or anything, although it is being said that C&G is doing this.  I have contributed a lot to SM and it has been a labor of love, but I guess I just don't feel comfortable now and I don't want to be attacked. I am so upset by what I see happening here at SM and I really do care about the other monkeys.

Hello SS and Happy New Year!I've been told today that i'm stirring the pot.Isn't asking questions how we get to the TRUTH??It's OK to agree to disagree.We are all Monkey's.



Thank you and Happy New Year to you also.  I recall  New Year's Eve in Seattle!!!

People love the Space Needle Fireworks!Me.I stay in and safe!Been a rough year for our sports up here in Seattle but that's OK.I've been on SM for about a year but took some time off then jumped back on.People have to understand to agree to disagree from my standpoint.Me personally.I see things being brought to the light from posters and others don't like that!Why?Many different reasons i would think but don't know.I for one see a concerted effort to discredit Kermit,as well as the other Freebirds who've turned up to speak freely.That's what is special about SM for me is the openness.Private Forums!Not my thing.If other people want to be a part of that it's OK with me.I trust Klaas as well as the Mods here at SM.Again.Nice to see you and let the TRUTH be told.....

KEEPTHEFAITH
KTF..maybe I'm not understanding correctly, but my reading of the posts from the freebirds that come over to back Kermit seem to imply that by doing so they won't be posting at freebirds anymore? If that's the case, maybe they are giving up something because they support Kermit at the risk of staying with freebirds.
Klass, honorable Freebirds...Have I got that right?
Thanks,
billb


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #788 12/31/08 -
Post by: texasmom on December 31, 2008, 09:02:32 PM
Best wishes to everyone for a healthy and prosperous 2009.

You too, SS!


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #788 12/31/08 -
Post by: ospainter on December 31, 2008, 09:03:16 PM


Remeber the group early on  in 2005 that had about 5 people posting under "Bondia"  I think that was the name. Renfro was one of them.

HI Sunny,

grrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrr, yes I remember..all too well......

Happy New Year Everyone

OS

Hi Os- Happy New Year!

HI Klaas,

Happy New Year to you too.

Still don't know how you do it,  God Bless ya..

Oh do you remember the hell I raised when Renho quoted my post and changed the wording..it was the Skeeter's tape with DK..I think I lost my mind that night and have never fully recovered..lol...that witch..I try not to hate anyone but boy I really don't like her..

I left that night for about 6 months, and came back and found out she was banned the same time I left. lol..

HUGS,

OS


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #788 12/31/08 -
Post by: klaasend on December 31, 2008, 09:03:23 PM
Billb - I don't know, I am not a member of Freebirds so I don't know if those that came here to support Kermit have all left. 


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #788 12/31/08 -
Post by: ospainter on December 31, 2008, 09:05:29 PM
Happy New Year, Everyone!

Happy New Year Art..

HUGS,

OS


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #788 12/31/08 -
Post by: ospainter on December 31, 2008, 09:06:59 PM


Happy New Year OsPainter and Artcolley, good to see you both!!!! 

Texasmom,

Happy New Year

Nice to see you too..

OS


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #788 12/31/08 -
Post by: Keepthefaith on December 31, 2008, 09:07:00 PM
I just don't understand why people like Mum and Lalas & idstlou and
all of the former posters here are so angry.
Anybody who reads all of this information should see the
truth to it.  They are nitpicking at the least little word.

Why are they so mad about it all?




Hi Mags, Happy New Year!

I will stick my neck out and speak for myself and please don't look at this as a drive by.  The reason that I am no longer posting has absolutely nothing to do with what I think of the cage or Kyle.  I am no longer posting because I was attacked for asking a very sincere question a few weeks ago, and I sure didn't see anyone else trying to diffuse the attack.  I asked whether Freebirds was the site where Kyle had given Kermit his information.  I also asked why the other Freebirds had left Kermit to reveal all of this alone like a sacrificial lamb or a pinata.  Kermit even responded with a photograph of Lambchops.  One person in particular told me to go back to the forum where that question had originated.  Well, that question originated in my head and as a matter of fact, the question has now answered itself with the emergence of several Freebirds.  So, why was I attacked?  I know that many people on SM belong to additional forums, some of which are private.  Why am I being attacked because I am a member at C&G?  That doesn't mean that I am less of a member at SM.  I don't want to be told where I can participate and I don't want to be ridiculed or insulted because I belong to other forums.  I am not spewing lies about anyone or anything, although it is being said that C&G is doing this.  I have contributed a lot to SM and it has been a labor of love, but I guess I just don't feel comfortable now and I don't want to be attacked. I am so upset by what I see happening here at SM and I really do care about the other monkeys.

Hello SS and Happy New Year!I've been told today that i'm stirring the pot.Isn't asking questions how we get to the TRUTH??It's OK to agree to disagree.We are all Monkey's.



Thank you and Happy New Year to you also.  I recall  New Year's Eve in Seattle!!!

People love the Space Needle Fireworks!Me.I stay in and safe!Been a rough year for our sports up here in Seattle but that's OK.I've been on SM for about a year but took some time off then jumped back on.People have to understand to agree to disagree from my standpoint.Me personally.I see things being brought to the light from posters and others don't like that!Why?Many different reasons i would think but don't know.I for one see a concerted effort to discredit Kermit,as well as the other Freebirds who've turned up to speak freely.That's what is special about SM for me is the openness.Private Forums!Not my thing.If other people want to be a part of that it's OK with me.I trust Klaas as well as the Mods here at SM.Again.Nice to see you and let the TRUTH be told.....

KEEPTHEFAITH
KTF..maybe I'm not understanding correctly, but my reading of the posts from the freebirds that come over to back Kermit seem to imply that by doing so they won't be posting at freebirds anymore? If that's the case, maybe they are giving up something because they support Kermit at the risk of staying with freebirds.
Klass, honorable Freebirds...Have I got that right?
Thanks,
billb

I'm sure Wingnut,Jen,Kermit,as well as Angie will have to answer for themselves but that is my understanding.Not sure if they still post their or not but their always welcome here!! ::MonkeyDance:: ::MonkeyDance::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #788 12/31/08 -
Post by: Artcolley on December 31, 2008, 09:07:10 PM
Happy New Year, OS
((((Hugs))))))


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #788 12/31/08 -
Post by: wreck on December 31, 2008, 09:08:23 PM
Billb - I don't know, I am not a member of Freebirds so I don't know if those that came here to support Kermit have all left. 
The way I'm reading it, once you reveal you are a member of Freebirds -- you must LEAVE Freebirds. These people think the TRUTH is more important than their forum.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #788 12/31/08 -
Post by: billb's daughter on December 31, 2008, 09:09:02 PM
Billb - I don't know, I am not a member of Freebirds so I don't know if those that came here to support Kermit have all left. 
Thanks Klaas...
Happy New Year to you and ALL MONKEYS...
I Stand with the Girl and the Frog...@009 will be the year for JUSTICE FOR NATALEE!!!! I feel it ::MonkeyCool::
JQK/Greta/Peter DV....God speed....


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #788 12/31/08 -
Post by: MuffyBee on December 31, 2008, 09:10:03 PM
I had posted a hello to Art & OS, along with a New Year's message, but removed it quickly.  Instead of Happy New Year fireworks, the guy with the moving eyebrows showed up... ::MonkeyConfused::


It's great to see you both, and all of the monkeys that have dropped by.  ::MonkeyDance::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #788 12/31/08 -
Post by: ospainter on December 31, 2008, 09:10:14 PM

Remeber the group early on  in 2005 that had about 5 people posting under "Bondia"  I think that was the name. Renfro was one of them.

HI Sunny,

grrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrr, yes I remember..all too well......

Happy New Year Everyone

OS

OS is is really good to see you!!  ::MonkeyDance:: How are you doing??  I hate Renho............I know it's wrong to hate but it's the strongest word I can think of to describe how I feel about her :smt096

Sunny

I am ok..just plugging along..

I try not to hate but sometimes it is hard..

So good to see you too..

Happy New Year

HUGS,

OS


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #788 12/31/08 -
Post by: hotping on December 31, 2008, 09:10:27 PM
Happy New Year Everyone!  May... 2009.... Bring Natalee Home to Rest in Peace!


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #788 12/31/08 -
Post by: Keepthefaith on December 31, 2008, 09:11:10 PM
Billb - I don't know, I am not a member of Freebirds so I don't know if those that came here to support Kermit have all left. 
Thanks Klaas...
Happy New Year to you and ALL MONKEYS...
I Stand with the Girl and the Frog...@009 will be the year for JUSTICE FOR NATALEE!!!! I feel it ::MonkeyCool::
JQK/Greta/Peter DV....God speed....

 ::MonkeyDance:: ::MonkeyDance:: ::MonkeyDance:: WE PRAY FOR GOD SPEED BILLB..


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #788 12/31/08 -
Post by: bastibro on December 31, 2008, 09:11:31 PM


Remeber the group early on  in 2005 that had about 5 people posting under "Bondia"  I think that was the name. Renfro was one of them.

HI Sunny,

grrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrr, yes I remember..all too well......

Happy New Year Everyone

OS

Hi Os- Happy New Year!

HI Klaas,

Happy New Year to you too.

Still don't know how you do it,  God Bless ya..

Oh do you remember the hell I raised when Renho quoted my post and changed the wording..it was the Skeeter's tape with DK..I think I lost my mind that night and have never fully recovered..lol...that witch..I try not to hate anyone but boy I really don't like her..

I left that night for about 6 months, and came back and found out she was banned the same time I left. lol..

HUGS,

OS

Well, i guess we all know who was talking  ::MonkeyHaHa::

(http://i272.photobucket.com/albums/jj176/bastibro/Happy-22.jpg)


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #788 12/31/08 -
Post by: MuffyBee on December 31, 2008, 09:11:58 PM
(http://bestsmileys.com/fireworks/5.gif)


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #788 12/31/08 -
Post by: Keepthefaith on December 31, 2008, 09:12:29 PM
Happy New Year Everyone!  May... 2009.... Bring Natalee Home to Rest in Peace!

 ::MonkeyDance:: ::MonkeyDance:: BRING NATALEE HOME   ::cartwheel::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #788 12/31/08 -
Post by: billb's daughter on December 31, 2008, 09:13:07 PM
Billb - I don't know, I am not a member of Freebirds so I don't know if those that came here to support Kermit have all left. 
The way I'm reading it, once you reveal you are a member of Freebirds -- you must LEAVE Freebirds. These people think the TRUTH is more important than their forum.
Thanks Wreck...I didn't know the reason why, but I perceived they are honorable in their backing of Kermit...seeking TRUTH for Natalee.....


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #788 12/31/08 -
Post by: Frijole on December 31, 2008, 09:14:02 PM
 ::MonkeyEek::

Hi Monkeys.  I have been reading here since the beginning and I check in quite a bit - I just don't have time to read every single post but I usually read every day.... and I am lost. I have no idea what is going on, why people are coming and going, pissed off whatever...I feel like I am reading a really juicy spy novel.  Problem is I missed chapter 1, I read chapter 2 and missed 3 and 4.... ::MonkeyConfused::

But anyway... I still stand by the girl.  I still believe that people for the most part are good intentioned and that the guilty will pay in the end.  For those who actively keep this case alive and try to bring justice for Natalee - I thank you.

Happy New Years to all.  (and go Huskers!)

Frijole


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #788 12/31/08 -
Post by: Magnolia on December 31, 2008, 09:14:12 PM
IIRC...Jen and Wingnut both said that they resigned to
come here and support Kermit.  Then Angie said that she
would have to turn in her resignation. Kermit resigned to
come here and tell us what he did.

I think they all made an honorable and courageous decision
to support the effort to bring Natalee home and they have
been attacked here.

I think it is heartwarming.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #788 12/31/08 -
Post by: Artcolley on December 31, 2008, 09:14:51 PM
Well, from what I've seen of the behavior of the Freebirds that have posted here today, I must say I am proud to be in the company of such honorable people.

A rare thing to find these days, people with the courage of their convictions, that put honor and justice above all.

Standing with the Frog is the right thing to do.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #788 12/31/08 -
Post by: Artcolley on December 31, 2008, 09:15:56 PM
I had posted a hello to Art & OS, along with a New Year's message, but removed it quickly.  Instead of Happy New Year fireworks, the guy with the moving eyebrows showed up... ::MonkeyConfused::


It's great to see you both, and all of the monkeys that have dropped by.  ::MonkeyDance::


Hey, Muffee! I LIKE the guy with the eyebrows, too!  Happy New Years to you!!!!


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #788 12/31/08 -
Post by: ospainter on December 31, 2008, 09:17:08 PM
I had posted a hello to Art & OS, along with a New Year's message, but removed it quickly.  Instead of Happy New Year fireworks, the guy with the moving eyebrows showed up... ::MonkeyConfused::


It's great to see you both, and all of the monkeys that have dropped by.  ::MonkeyDance::

HI Muffy,

Happy New Year, I have missed you..

I remember..

 :2waver:

HUGS

OS


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #788 12/31/08 -
Post by: bastibro on December 31, 2008, 09:18:01 PM
::MonkeyEek::

Hi Monkeys.  I have been reading here since the beginning and I check in quite a bit - I just don't have time to read every single post but I usually read every day.... and I am lost. I have no idea what is going on, why people are coming and going, pissed off whatever...I feel like I am reading a really juicy spy novel.  Problem is I missed chapter 1, I read chapter 2 and missed 3 and 4.... ::MonkeyConfused::

But anyway... I still stand by the girl.  I still believe that people for the most part are good intentioned and that the guilty will pay in the end.  For those who actively keep this case alive and try to bring justice for Natalee - I thank you.

Happy New Years to all.  (and go Huskers!)

Frijole


You`re not at all lost Frijole,

You are lucky  ::MonkeyHaHa::  Happy new year and God bless U.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #788 12/31/08 -
Post by: MuffyBee on December 31, 2008, 09:20:17 PM
I had posted a hello to Art & OS, along with a New Year's message, but removed it quickly.  Instead of Happy New Year fireworks, the guy with the moving eyebrows showed up... ::MonkeyConfused::


It's great to see you both, and all of the monkeys that have dropped by.  ::MonkeyDance::


Hey, Muffee! I LIKE the guy with the eyebrows, too!  Happy New Years to you!!!!

Alllllrighty then!  (http://bestsmileys.com/movingeyes/3.gif)   ::MonkeyHaHa::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #788 12/31/08 -
Post by: ospainter on December 31, 2008, 09:20:29 PM


Remeber the group early on  in 2005 that had about 5 people posting under "Bondia"  I think that was the name. Renfro was one of them.

HI Sunny,

grrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrr, yes I remember..all too well......

Happy New Year Everyone

OS

Hi Os- Happy New Year!

HI Klaas,

Happy New Year to you too.

Still don't know how you do it,  God Bless ya..

Oh do you remember the hell I raised when Renho quoted my post and changed the wording..it was the Skeeter's tape with DK..I think I lost my mind that night and have never fully recovered..lol...that witch..I try not to hate anyone but boy I really don't like her..

I left that night for about 6 months, and came back and found out she was banned the same time I left. lol..

HUGS,

OS

Well, i guess we all know who was talking  ::MonkeyHaHa::

(http://i272.photobucket.com/albums/jj176/bastibro/Happy-22.jpg)

LOL



Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #788 12/31/08 -
Post by: texasmom on December 31, 2008, 09:21:03 PM
Billb - I don't know, I am not a member of Freebirds so I don't know if those that came here to support Kermit have all left. 
Thanks Klaas...
Happy New Year to you and ALL MONKEYS...
I Stand with the Girl and the Frog...@009 will be the year for JUSTICE FOR NATALEE!!!! I feel it ::MonkeyCool::
JQK/Greta/Peter DV....God speed....

Happy New Year billb!  I hope your feeling is right!!!!   ::MonkeyCool::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #788 12/31/08 -
Post by: texasmom on December 31, 2008, 09:21:55 PM
Happy New Year Everyone!  May... 2009.... Bring Natalee Home to Rest in Peace!

Happy New Year Hotping!!!!  I hope so too!!!


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #788 12/31/08 -
Post by: texasmom on December 31, 2008, 09:24:36 PM
::MonkeyEek::

Hi Monkeys.  I have been reading here since the beginning and I check in quite a bit - I just don't have time to read every single post but I usually read every day.... and I am lost. I have no idea what is going on, why people are coming and going, pissed off whatever...I feel like I am reading a really juicy spy novel.  Problem is I missed chapter 1, I read chapter 2 and missed 3 and 4.... ::MonkeyConfused::

But anyway... I still stand by the girl.  I still believe that people for the most part are good intentioned and that the guilty will pay in the end.  For those who actively keep this case alive and try to bring justice for Natalee - I thank you.

Happy New Years to all.  (and go Huskers!)

Frijole


Happy New Year to you too!!!!  ::MonkeyCool::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #788 12/31/08 -
Post by: Magnolia on December 31, 2008, 09:24:39 PM
::MonkeyEek::

Hi Monkeys.  I have been reading here since the beginning and I check in quite a bit - I just don't have time to read every single post but I usually read every day.... and I am lost. I have no idea what is going on, why people are coming and going, pissed off whatever...I feel like I am reading a really juicy spy novel.  Problem is I missed chapter 1, I read chapter 2 and missed 3 and 4.... ::MonkeyConfused::

But anyway... I still stand by the girl.  I still believe that people for the most part are good intentioned and that the guilty will pay in the end.  For those who actively keep this case alive and try to bring justice for Natalee - I thank you.

Happy New Years to all.  (and go Huskers!)

Frijole

We need a turnstile, Frijole.

Happy 2009 to you and all the Monkeys!



Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #788 12/31/08 -
Post by: texasmom on December 31, 2008, 09:25:53 PM
Well, from what I've seen of the behavior of the Freebirds that have posted here today, I must say I am proud to be in the company of such honorable people.

A rare thing to find these days, people with the courage of their convictions, that put honor and justice above all.

Standing with the Frog is the right thing to do.


I agree!   ::MonkeyDance::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #788 12/31/08 -
Post by: Keepthefaith on December 31, 2008, 09:27:10 PM
Dozens killed in Bangkok nightclub fire
At least 59 people were killed in a fire that broke out in a nightclub in Bangkok during New Year's Eve celebrations, Thai police said. The fire, at a club called Zantika, started at about 12:35 a.m., police told CNN. Most victims were Thai, but foreigners have been identified from Australia, the Netherlands, Nepal and Japan.


Ya think????Nooooooooo....


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #788 12/31/08 -
Post by: Nut44x4 on December 31, 2008, 09:30:44 PM
Betcha Joran's got CRABS

If this is true and he is still in Thailand then he may just have Crispy Critters now.
http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2008/12/31/world/main4694580.shtml
New Year's Club Fire Kills 59 In Bangkok
Foreigners Among The Dead As Blaze Sweeps Through Posh Nightclub Jammed With Hundreds
Comments 1
BANGKOK, Thailand, Dec. 31, 2008


Guess you missed my comment to Grannytoad ...  ::MonkeyCool::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #788 12/31/08 -
Post by: billb's daughter on December 31, 2008, 09:31:46 PM
Dozens killed in Bangkok nightclub fire
At least 59 people were killed in a fire that broke out in a nightclub in Bangkok during New Year's Eve celebrations, Thai police said. The fire, at a club called Zantika, started at about 12:35 a.m., police told CNN. Most victims were Thai, but foreigners have been identified from Australia, the Netherlands, Nepal and Japan.


Ya think????Nooooooooo....
I'm probably bad for posting this.....but I want the miserable pos to really suffer with some level of exposure for his role in Natalee's murder and then disposal....Then AFTER that episode (may it be long and unbearable) Karma can then have his a$$!
MHOO.... ::MonkeyWink::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #788 12/31/08 -
Post by: San on December 31, 2008, 09:32:08 PM
(http://i34.photobucket.com/albums/d118/Sanddrops/Happy2009.jpg)


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #788 12/31/08 -
Post by: Keepthefaith on December 31, 2008, 09:32:10 PM
Betcha Joran's got CRABS

If this is true and he is still in Thailand then he may just have Crispy Critters now.
http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2008/12/31/world/main4694580.shtml
New Year's Club Fire Kills 59 In Bangkok
Foreigners Among The Dead As Blaze Sweeps Through Posh Nightclub Jammed With Hundreds
Comments 1
BANGKOK, Thailand, Dec. 31, 2008


Guess you missed my comment to Grannytoad ...  ::MonkeyCool::

I did. ::MonkeyHaHa::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #788 12/31/08 -
Post by: Frijole on December 31, 2008, 09:32:22 PM

You`re not at all lost Frijole,

You are lucky  ::MonkeyHaHa::  Happy new year and God bless U.

 ::MonkeyHaHa::  Thank you!  I just wanted to say how much I appreciate all of your work in translating and keeping us informed of Joran's activities overseas.  It's like the cartoon "Where is Waldo". 

Happy new year to you too!


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #788 12/31/08 -
Post by: Blue Moon on December 31, 2008, 09:34:04 PM
Dozens killed in Bangkok nightclub fire
At least 59 people were killed in a fire that broke out in a nightclub in Bangkok during New Year's Eve celebrations, Thai police said. The fire, at a club called Zantika, started at about 12:35 a.m., police told CNN. Most victims were Thai, but foreigners have been identified from Australia, the Netherlands, Nepal and Japan.


Ya think????Nooooooooo....
I'm probably bad for posting this.....but I want the miserable pos to really suffer with some level of exposure for his role in Natalee's murder and then disposal....Then AFTER that episode (may it be long and unbearable) Karma can then have his a$$!
MHOO.... ::MonkeyWink::

Not bad at all.  I was thinking the same thing.   ::MonkeyHaHa::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #788 12/31/08 -
Post by: texasmom on December 31, 2008, 09:35:23 PM
(http://i34.photobucket.com/albums/d118/Sanddrops/Happy2009.jpg)

I love it San!  Happy New Year to you!

 ::MonkeyDance:: ::cartwheel:: ::MonkeyDance:: ::cartwheel:: ::MonkeyDance:: ::cartwheel:: ::MonkeyDance:: ::cartwheel::



Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #788 12/31/08 -
Post by: hotping on December 31, 2008, 09:35:40 PM
Happy New Year Everyone!  May... 2009.... Bring Natalee Home to Rest in Peace!

Happy New Year Hotping!!!!  I hope so too!!!
Happy New Year TM! And BillB I Hope You are right about Your Feelings!  ::MonkeyWink::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #788 12/31/08 -
Post by: Artcolley on December 31, 2008, 09:35:40 PM
Dozens killed in Bangkok nightclub fire
At least 59 people were killed in a fire that broke out in a nightclub in Bangkok during New Year's Eve celebrations, Thai police said. The fire, at a club called Zantika, started at about 12:35 a.m., police told CNN. Most victims were Thai, but foreigners have been identified from Australia, the Netherlands, Nepal and Japan.


Ya think????Nooooooooo....

OH, Oh , Oh , Oh.  PLEASE....Let Karma have done its job!  ::MonkeyCool::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #788 12/31/08 -
Post by: texasmom on December 31, 2008, 09:36:31 PM
Dozens killed in Bangkok nightclub fire
At least 59 people were killed in a fire that broke out in a nightclub in Bangkok during New Year's Eve celebrations, Thai police said. The fire, at a club called Zantika, started at about 12:35 a.m., police told CNN. Most victims were Thai, but foreigners have been identified from Australia, the Netherlands, Nepal and Japan.


Ya think????Nooooooooo....
I'm probably bad for posting this.....but I want the miserable pos to really suffer with some level of exposure for his role in Natalee's murder and then disposal....Then AFTER that episode (may it be long and unbearable) Karma can then have his a$$!
MHOO.... ::MonkeyWink::

Thanks billb, I started posting something too; but decided it was tooooooo bad.   ::MonkeyHaHa::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #788 12/31/08 -
Post by: hotping on December 31, 2008, 09:37:27 PM
Dozens killed in Bangkok nightclub fire
At least 59 people were killed in a fire that broke out in a nightclub in Bangkok during New Year's Eve celebrations, Thai police said. The fire, at a club called Zantika, started at about 12:35 a.m., police told CNN. Most victims were Thai, but foreigners have been identified from Australia, the Netherlands, Nepal and Japan.


Ya think????Nooooooooo....
I'm probably bad for posting this.....but I want the miserable pos to really suffer with some level of exposure for his role in Natalee's murder and then disposal....Then AFTER that episode (may it be long and unbearable) Karma can then have his a$$!
MHOO.... ::MonkeyWink::

Thanks billb, I started posting something too; but decided it was tooooooo bad.   ::MonkeyHaHa::
::MonkeyHaHa:: ::MonkeyWink::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #788 12/31/08 -
Post by: ospainter on December 31, 2008, 09:38:55 PM
(http://i34.photobucket.com/albums/d118/Sanddrops/Happy2009.jpg)

San

Happy New Year

OS


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #788 12/31/08 -
Post by: hotping on December 31, 2008, 09:39:33 PM
O/T Wreck....I was wondering about Your friend that was hurt in the robbery attempt....How Is He doing?   


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #788 12/31/08 -
Post by: bastibro on December 31, 2008, 09:39:34 PM
Dozens killed in Bangkok nightclub fire
At least 59 people were killed in a fire that broke out in a nightclub in Bangkok during New Year's Eve celebrations, Thai police said. The fire, at a club called Zantika, started at about 12:35 a.m., police told CNN. Most victims were Thai, but foreigners have been identified from Australia, the Netherlands, Nepal and Japan.


Ya think????Nooooooooo....

I don`t want him dead yet,

I want him to tell the truth first ::MonkeyNoNo::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #788 12/31/08 -
Post by: Anna on December 31, 2008, 09:40:52 PM
((edit))
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ujX9mfWpJug&feature=related


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #788 12/31/08 -
Post by: ospainter on December 31, 2008, 09:41:34 PM
Dozens killed in Bangkok nightclub fire
At least 59 people were killed in a fire that broke out in a nightclub in Bangkok during New Year's Eve celebrations, Thai police said. The fire, at a club called Zantika, started at about 12:35 a.m., police told CNN. Most victims were Thai, but foreigners have been identified from Australia, the Netherlands, Nepal and Japan.


Ya think????Nooooooooo....

I don`t want him dead yet,

I want him to tell the truth first ::MonkeyNoNo::

OH me too, me too..

OS


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #788 12/31/08 -
Post by: Keepthefaith on December 31, 2008, 09:46:57 PM
Betcha Joran's got CRABS

If this is true and he is still in Thailand then he may just have Crispy Critters now.
http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2008/12/31/world/main4694580.shtml
New Year's Club Fire Kills 59 In Bangkok
Foreigners Among The Dead As Blaze Sweeps Through Posh Nightclub Jammed With Hundreds
Comments 1
BANGKOK, Thailand, Dec. 31, 2008


Guess you missed my comment to Grannytoad ...  ::MonkeyCool::

 ::MonkeyLaugh:: Burn baby burn,Disco Inferno... ::MonkeyLaugh:: ::MonkeyLaugh::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #788 12/31/08 -
Post by: Anna on December 31, 2008, 09:48:04 PM
Well, someone could always just pummel the truth out of Joran.

But that would be wrong, oh so very wrong!!!


 ::MonkeyHaHa:: ::MonkeyHaHa:: ::MonkeyHaHa::



Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #788 12/31/08 -
Post by: Keepthefaith on December 31, 2008, 09:48:14 PM
Betcha Joran's got CRABS

If this is true and he is still in Thailand then he may just have Crispy Critters now.
http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2008/12/31/world/main4694580.shtml
New Year's Club Fire Kills 59 In Bangkok
Foreigners Among The Dead As Blaze Sweeps Through Posh Nightclub Jammed With Hundreds
Comments 1
BANGKOK, Thailand, Dec. 31, 2008


Guess you missed my comment to Grannytoad ...  ::MonkeyCool::

 ::MonkeyLaugh:: Burn baby burn,Disco Inferno... ::MonkeyLaugh:: ::MonkeyLaugh::

No disrespect to the deceased!Just thinkin of Joran BURNIN up tha dance floor!!


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #788 12/31/08 -
Post by: billb's daughter on December 31, 2008, 09:52:34 PM
BoxerDawg, Maw, pinetucky,  and 21 Guests are viewing this topic.
You don't know me, and I don't know you.....but welcome to SM...you must be good people since you are here seeking Justice for Natalee...
Happy New Year!  ::MonkeyDance:: ::MonkeyDance::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #788 12/31/08 -
Post by: bastibro on December 31, 2008, 09:53:32 PM
Betcha Joran's got CRABS

If this is true and he is still in Thailand then he may just have Crispy Critters now.
http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2008/12/31/world/main4694580.shtml
New Year's Club Fire Kills 59 In Bangkok
Foreigners Among The Dead As Blaze Sweeps Through Posh Nightclub Jammed With Hundreds
Comments 1
BANGKOK, Thailand, Dec. 31, 2008


Guess you missed my comment to Grannytoad ...  ::MonkeyCool::

 ::MonkeyLaugh:: Burn baby burn,Disco Inferno... ::MonkeyLaugh:: ::MonkeyLaugh::

No disrespect to the deceased!Just thinkin of Joran BURNIN up tha dance floor!!

I think he`ll burn eventually.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #788 12/31/08 -
Post by: Magnolia on December 31, 2008, 09:54:34 PM
Well, someone could always just pummel the truth out of Joran.

But that would be wrong, oh so very wrong!!!


 ::MonkeyHaHa:: ::MonkeyHaHa:: ::MonkeyHaHa::



We discussed a hit man the other day.  Neither San or I had a hit man
in our address book.....but Janet and Blond did. ::MonkeyHaHa::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #788 12/31/08 -
Post by: Anna on December 31, 2008, 09:56:22 PM
Well, someone could always just pummel the truth out of Joran.

But that would be wrong, oh so very wrong!!!


 ::MonkeyHaHa:: ::MonkeyHaHa:: ::MonkeyHaHa::



We discussed a hit man the other day.  Neither San or I had a hit man
in our address book.....but Janet and Blond did. ::MonkeyHaHa::


 ::MonkeyShocked::

 ::MonkeyHaHa:: ::MonkeyHaHa:: ::MonkeyHaHa::

http://scaredmonkeys.net/index.php?action=post2


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #788 12/31/08 -
Post by: billb's daughter on December 31, 2008, 09:56:41 PM
Well, someone could always just pummel the truth out of Joran.

But that would be wrong, oh so very wrong!!!


 ::MonkeyHaHa:: ::MonkeyHaHa:: ::MonkeyHaHa::



We discussed a hit man the other day.  Neither San or I had a hit man
in our address book.....but Janet and Blond did. ::MonkeyHaHa::
Maybe if someone could convince ROBOT's to return.....I'd go with him to beat the crap out of urine ::MonkeyCool::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #788 12/31/08 -
Post by: Nut44x4 on December 31, 2008, 09:57:25 PM
Well, someone could always just pummel the truth out of Joran.

But that would be wrong, oh so very wrong!!!


 ::MonkeyHaHa:: ::MonkeyHaHa:: ::MonkeyHaHa::


May I ??
(http://bestsmileys.com/violent/18.gif)


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #788 12/31/08 -
Post by: bastibro on December 31, 2008, 09:59:22 PM
Well, someone could always just pummel the truth out of Joran.

But that would be wrong, oh so very wrong!!!


 ::MonkeyHaHa:: ::MonkeyHaHa:: ::MonkeyHaHa::



We discussed a hit man the other day.  Neither San or I had a hit man
in our address book.....but Janet and Blond did. ::MonkeyHaHa::
Maybe if someone could convince ROBOT's to return.....I'd go with him to beat the crap out of urine ::MonkeyCool::

I don`t know robot but beating the crap out of Urine would be a very good point IMO  ::MonkeyHaHa::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #788 12/31/08 -
Post by: bastibro on December 31, 2008, 10:00:43 PM
Well, someone could always just pummel the truth out of Joran.

But that would be wrong, oh so very wrong!!!


 ::MonkeyHaHa:: ::MonkeyHaHa:: ::MonkeyHaHa::


May I ??
(http://bestsmileys.com/violent/18.gif)

PRICELESS  ::MonkeyLaugh::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #788 12/31/08 -
Post by: Magnolia on December 31, 2008, 10:01:12 PM
Well, someone could always just pummel the truth out of Joran.

But that would be wrong, oh so very wrong!!!


 ::MonkeyHaHa:: ::MonkeyHaHa:: ::MonkeyHaHa::



We discussed a hit man the other day.  Neither San or I had a hit man
in our address book.....but Janet and Blond did. ::MonkeyHaHa::
Maybe if someone could convince ROBOT's to return.....I'd go with him to beat the crap out of urine ::MonkeyCool::

billb, I was sorta hoping that you might do an impersonation of
Robots tonight...being it's New Year's Eve and all. ::MonkeyDance::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #788 12/31/08 -
Post by: Nut44x4 on December 31, 2008, 10:02:07 PM
Well Monkey friends.......it has been a very long week, although it is only Wednesday. I wish you all a Happy 2009. I am a party pooper and I have earned the right to be. 19 months and 9 days w/o a drink. Will ya all please have one or eight for Nut?? I should be pretty buzzed if ya all do that 4 me  ::MonkeyHaHa:: Goodnight and see ya next year.
Goodnight Sweet Peaches  :smt059


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #788 12/31/08 -
Post by: billb's daughter on December 31, 2008, 10:03:10 PM
Well, someone could always just pummel the truth out of Joran.

But that would be wrong, oh so very wrong!!!


 ::MonkeyHaHa:: ::MonkeyHaHa:: ::MonkeyHaHa::



We discussed a hit man the other day.  Neither San or I had a hit man
in our address book.....but Janet and Blond did. ::MonkeyHaHa::
Maybe if someone could convince ROBOT's to return.....I'd go with him to beat the crap out of urine ::MonkeyCool::

billb, I was sorta hoping that you might do an impersonation of
Robots tonight...being it's New Year's Eve and all. ::MonkeyDance::
Mags...
I'd love too...but I'm 99 years old!
I HATE THEM ALL!



Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #788 12/31/08 -
Post by: Keepthefaith on December 31, 2008, 10:03:26 PM
Well Monkey friends.......it has been a very long week, although it is only Wednesday. I wish you all a Happy 2009. I am a party pooper and I have earned the right to be. 19 months and 9 days w/o a drink. Will ya all please have one or eight for Nut?? I should be pretty buzzed if ya all do that 4 me  ::MonkeyHaHa:: Goodnight and see ya next year.
Goodnight Sweet Peaches  :smt059

GoodNight Nut44..God Bless and Happy New Year! ::MonkeyDance::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #788 12/31/08 -
Post by: texasmom on December 31, 2008, 10:03:59 PM
Well Monkey friends.......it has been a very long week, although it is only Wednesday. I wish you all a Happy 2009. I am a party pooper and I have earned the right to be. 19 months and 9 days w/o a drink. Will ya all please have one or eight for Nut?? I should be pretty buzzed if ya all do that 4 me  ::MonkeyHaHa:: Goodnight and see ya next year.
Goodnight Sweet Peaches  :smt059

Happy New Year Nut!!!!   ::MonkeyCool::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #788 12/31/08 -
Post by: texasmom on December 31, 2008, 10:04:46 PM
Well, someone could always just pummel the truth out of Joran.

But that would be wrong, oh so very wrong!!!


 ::MonkeyHaHa:: ::MonkeyHaHa:: ::MonkeyHaHa::



We discussed a hit man the other day.  Neither San or I had a hit man
in our address book.....but Janet and Blond did. ::MonkeyHaHa::
Maybe if someone could convince ROBOT's to return.....I'd go with him to beat the crap out of urine ::MonkeyCool::

billb, I was sorta hoping that you might do an impersonation of
Robots tonight...being it's New Year's Eve and all. ::MonkeyDance::
Mags...
I'd love too...but I'm 99 years old!
I HATE THEM ALL!



 ::MonkeyDance::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #788 12/31/08 -
Post by: Kiwi on December 31, 2008, 10:06:28 PM
Well, someone could always just pummel the truth out of Joran.

But that would be wrong, oh so very wrong!!!


 ::MonkeyHaHa:: ::MonkeyHaHa:: ::MonkeyHaHa::


May I ??
(http://bestsmileys.com/violent/18.gif)

PRICELESS  ::MonkeyLaugh::
If its been 3.6 years now, then its 3.5 years too long. I would vote for walking the plank off a boat blind folded in 3ft of water. I wonder what he would say! The above sounds more personally satisfying!


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #788 12/31/08 -
Post by: Magnolia on December 31, 2008, 10:06:34 PM
Well Monkey friends.......it has been a very long week, although it is only Wednesday. I wish you all a Happy 2009. I am a party pooper and I have earned the right to be. 19 months and 9 days w/o a drink. Will ya all please have one or eight for Nut?? I should be pretty buzzed if ya all do that 4 me  ::MonkeyHaHa:: Goodnight and see ya next year.
Goodnight Sweet Peaches  :smt059

Congratulations, Nut.  Happy New Year.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #788 12/31/08 -
Post by: klaasend on December 31, 2008, 10:06:35 PM
Well Monkey friends.......it has been a very long week, although it is only Wednesday. I wish you all a Happy 2009. I am a party pooper and I have earned the right to be. 19 months and 9 days w/o a drink. Will ya all please have one or eight for Nut?? I should be pretty buzzed if ya all do that 4 me  ::MonkeyHaHa:: Goodnight and see ya next year.
Goodnight Sweet Peaches  :smt059

Nite Nut - HAPPY NEW YEAR!


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #788 12/31/08 -
Post by: billb's daughter on December 31, 2008, 10:06:41 PM
Well Monkey friends.......it has been a very long week, although it is only Wednesday. I wish you all a Happy 2009. I am a party pooper and I have earned the right to be. 19 months and 9 days w/o a drink. Will ya all please have one or eight for Nut?? I should be pretty buzzed if ya all do that 4 me  ::MonkeyHaHa:: Goodnight and see ya next year.
Goodnight Sweet Peaches  :smt059
Goodnight Nut...Happy New Year.
We Monkeys have a Sweet Peaches looking out for us now :smt059
God Bless her and her family


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #788 12/31/08 -
Post by: bastibro on December 31, 2008, 10:06:56 PM
Well Monkey friends.......it has been a very long week, although it is only Wednesday. I wish you all a Happy 2009. I am a party pooper and I have earned the right to be. 19 months and 9 days w/o a drink. Will ya all please have one or eight for Nut?? I should be pretty buzzed if ya all do that 4 me  ::MonkeyHaHa:: Goodnight and see ya next year.
Goodnight Sweet Peaches  :smt059

Yes (http://scaredmonkeys.net/Smileys/default/059.gif) Good night Monkeys and Nut, you`re a cutie  ::MonkeyWink::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #788 12/31/08 -
Post by: Magnolia on December 31, 2008, 10:09:50 PM
Well, someone could always just pummel the truth out of Joran.

But that would be wrong, oh so very wrong!!!


 ::MonkeyHaHa:: ::MonkeyHaHa:: ::MonkeyHaHa::



We discussed a hit man the other day.  Neither San or I had a hit man
in our address book.....but Janet and Blond did. ::MonkeyHaHa::
Maybe if someone could convince ROBOT's to return.....I'd go with him to beat the crap out of urine ::MonkeyCool::

billb, I was sorta hoping that you might do an impersonation of
Robots tonight...being it's New Year's Eve and all. ::MonkeyDance::
Mags...
I'd love too...but I'm 99 years old!
I HATE THEM ALL!



Thank you billb.  That was a great effort! ::MonkeyHaHa::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #788 12/31/08 -
Post by: Artcolley on December 31, 2008, 10:10:50 PM
NIte Nut!

Happy New Year!


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #788 12/31/08 -
Post by: Anna on December 31, 2008, 10:12:09 PM
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-Jgma--0WYU&feature=related

That is for our Peaches.  She will be missed.



Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #788 12/31/08 -
Post by: Lifesong on December 31, 2008, 10:12:14 PM
Well, from what I've seen of the behavior of the Freebirds that have posted here today, I must say I am proud to be in the company of such honorable people.

A rare thing to find these days, people with the courage of their convictions, that put honor and justice above all.

Standing with the Frog is the right thing to do.


I agree!   ::MonkeyDance::


It is indeed an honor to be in their company.  Thank you, Natalee's Freebirds.  You are a group  worthy of the name.

I'd still like to discuss the revelation of Tim Miller's departure from the Persistence, but it can wait until after the holiday festivities.

So for now...

Happy New Year, Monkeys.   ::MonkeyWink::
Let this be the year that Natalee finally comes home to her family.

May all God's creation be blessed!








Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #788 12/31/08 -
Post by: ospainter on December 31, 2008, 10:14:56 PM
Well Monkey friends.......it has been a very long week, although it is only Wednesday. I wish you all a Happy 2009. I am a party pooper and I have earned the right to be. 19 months and 9 days w/o a drink. Will ya all please have one or eight for Nut?? I should be pretty buzzed if ya all do that 4 me  ::MonkeyHaHa:: Goodnight and see ya next year.
Goodnight Sweet Peaches  :smt059

Happy New Year to you

Congrats..

I don't drink, but will have a caffeine free Pepsi for ya..

see ya next year..

OS


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #788 12/31/08 -
Post by: billb's daughter on December 31, 2008, 10:17:18 PM
Robot's last post:
1       Natalee Holloway / LCD Archive / Re: Natalee Case Discussion #722 2/4 -       on: February 04, 2008, 10:43:21 PM
excellent job Red !
fantastic support you were for many many people
so many pulled together- and you were leading many times
as i mentioned one crazy day there were some lessons that i hope people will never forget... i know i will never forget

Hope is a good thing, sometimes the best thing and sometimes its all we have.




my job is done here..

be well



Robots   ::MonkeyCool::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #788 12/31/08 -
Post by: Lifesong on December 31, 2008, 10:24:45 PM


billb -

I hope you are open to performing scientific experiments, you know, should the need arise.

 ::MonkeyDance::   ::MonkeyDance::
 ::cartwheel::



Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #788 12/31/08 -
Post by: nonesuche on December 31, 2008, 10:26:05 PM
I'd like to poke my head in for just a moment, I don't often post in this thread, don't post much period for work takes me on the road so often.

Something many of you might not know or even remember at this moment, is that Klaas began posting some of the "freebirds" work over two years ago on SM. Eventually several from that site migrated to SM to post as well, some like sharon were already members at both. I will admit I helped Jen and Klaas and Kermit to connect originally but it was for a specific reason - to advance the cause of finding Natalee. Both forums have worked together positively and in tandem, sharing information and with support for each other. What a positive that has been, a real value and contribution, working together?

It is unfortunate that Kermit has been attacked by so many, an FYI for Ldstlou - I actually took two days to read ALL of this and to try to catch up. You are misinterpreting a great deal and my concern is if this is a deliberate manipulation on your part?

I'm grateful I don't know about the latest sites or the Chat/Grumble one, frankly I don't need the drama but I can say I'm disappointed that this new site and some who are members here also, cannot see the negative disruption that is occurring with their drive-by's. Maybe you need to take a big step back and try to gain some objectivity, but trust me, it looks and feels and smells deliberate up close and very personal. Is the point of your site as some have stated to pursue sleuthing for missing cases, or is the intent there to take down SM? I have to wonder........but what I do know is you do have the power to make your mark upon this a positive and not a negative one - we all have that power.

Doesn't Natalee deserve better than this drama and distraction??? Isn't it about her?

It's not about you or me, and not even delicious frogs  ::MonkeyWink::




Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #788 12/31/08 -
Post by: klaasend on December 31, 2008, 10:32:00 PM
Thank you Nonesuche!  By the way, you need to check your email when you get a chance.   ::MonkeyCool::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #788 12/31/08 -
Post by: San on December 31, 2008, 10:33:17 PM
I'd like to poke my head in for just a moment, I don't often post in this thread, don't post much period for work takes me on the road so often.

Something many of you might not know or even remember at this moment, is that Klaas began posting some of the "freebirds" work over two years ago on SM. Eventually several from that site migrated to SM to post as well, some like sharon were already members at both. I will admit I helped Jen and Klaas and Kermit to connect originally but it was for a specific reason - to advance the cause of finding Natalee. Both forums have worked together positively and in tandem, sharing information and with support for each other. What a positive that has been, a real value and contribution, working together?

It is unfortunate that Kermit has been attacked by so many, an FYI for Ldstlou - I actually took two days to read ALL of this and to try to catch up. You are misinterpreting a great deal and my concern is if this is a deliberate manipulation on your part?

I'm grateful I don't know about the latest sites or the Chat/Grumble one, frankly I don't need the drama but I can say I'm disappointed that this new site and some who are members here also, cannot see the negative disruption that is occurring with their drive-by's. Maybe you need to take a big step back and try to gain some objectivity, but trust me, it looks and feels and smells deliberate up close and very personal. Is the point of your site as some have stated to pursue sleuthing for missing cases, or is the intent there to take down SM? I have to wonder........but what I do know is you do have the power to make your mark upon this a positive and not a negative one - we all have that power.

Doesn't Natalee deserve better than this drama and distraction??? Isn't it about her?

It's not about you or me, and not even delicious frogs  ::MonkeyWink::



Thanks Nonesuche.  ::cartwheel::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #788 12/31/08 -
Post by: billb's daughter on December 31, 2008, 10:35:41 PM


billb -

I hope you are open to performing scientific experiments, you know, should the need arise.

 ::MonkeyDance::   ::MonkeyDance::
 ::cartwheel::


If I can perform them on urine......I'm sure I can oblige..


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #788 12/31/08 -
Post by: Blue Moon on December 31, 2008, 10:42:00 PM
Well, someone could always just pummel the truth out of Joran.

But that would be wrong, oh so very wrong!!!


 ::MonkeyHaHa:: ::MonkeyHaHa:: ::MonkeyHaHa::



We discussed a hit man the other day.  Neither San or I had a hit man
in our address book.....but Janet and Blond did. ::MonkeyHaHa::
Maybe if someone could convince ROBOT's to return.....I'd go with him to beat the crap out of urine ::MonkeyCool::

billb, I was sorta hoping that you might do an impersonation of
Robots tonight...being it's New Year's Eve and all. ::MonkeyDance::
Mags...
I'd love too...but I'm 99 years old!
I HATE THEM ALL!



Oh MY!  Are you?


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #788 12/31/08 -
Post by: Keepthefaith on December 31, 2008, 10:44:01 PM
Thanx nonesuche!

JUSTICE FOR NATALEE   ::MonkeyDance:: ::MonkeyDance::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #788 12/31/08 -
Post by: Artcolley on December 31, 2008, 10:51:02 PM
HI None!

Excellent post!


Happy New Year!!!!! ::MonkeyWink::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #788 12/31/08 -
Post by: billb's daughter on December 31, 2008, 10:51:16 PM
Well, someone could always just pummel the truth out of Joran.

But that would be wrong, oh so very wrong!!!


 ::MonkeyHaHa:: ::MonkeyHaHa:: ::MonkeyHaHa::



We discussed a hit man the other day.  Neither San or I had a hit man
in our address book.....but Janet and Blond did. ::MonkeyHaHa::
Maybe if someone could convince ROBOT's to return.....I'd go with him to beat the crap out of urine ::MonkeyCool::

billb, I was sorta hoping that you might do an impersonation of
Robots tonight...being it's New Year's Eve and all. ::MonkeyDance::
Mags...
I'd love too...but I'm 99 years old!
I HATE THEM ALL!



Oh MY!  Are you?
No...but I do miss the old fart!...no offense to the real old fart. ::MonkeyCool::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #788 12/31/08 -
Post by: nonesuche on December 31, 2008, 10:55:38 PM
Artcolley, I've missed you !

keepthefaith, we need to keep the faith !

This is the third New Year's that Natalee's family begins without her, we can't lose sight of that.

Take care all !


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #788 12/31/08 -
Post by: klaasend on December 31, 2008, 10:57:19 PM
Artcolley, I've missed you !

keepthefaith, we need to keep the faith !

This is the third New Year's that Natalee's family begins without her, we can't lose sight of that.

Take care all !

Isn't it the 4th or am I counting wrong?

Happy New Year to you too Nonesuche!


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #788 12/31/08 -
Post by: MuffyBee on December 31, 2008, 10:59:10 PM
Happy New Year to you None.  I appreciate your message here.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #788 12/31/08 -
Post by: ospainter on December 31, 2008, 10:59:51 PM
Hi None

Great post

Happy New Year

OS


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #788 12/31/08 -
Post by: texasmom on December 31, 2008, 11:00:00 PM
I'd like to poke my head in for just a moment, I don't often post in this thread, don't post much period for work takes me on the road so often.

Something many of you might not know or even remember at this moment, is that Klaas began posting some of the "freebirds" work over two years ago on SM. Eventually several from that site migrated to SM to post as well, some like sharon were already members at both. I will admit I helped Jen and Klaas and Kermit to connect originally but it was for a specific reason - to advance the cause of finding Natalee. Both forums have worked together positively and in tandem, sharing information and with support for each other. What a positive that has been, a real value and contribution, working together?

It is unfortunate that Kermit has been attacked by so many, an FYI for Ldstlou - I actually took two days to read ALL of this and to try to catch up. You are misinterpreting a great deal and my concern is if this is a deliberate manipulation on your part?

I'm grateful I don't know about the latest sites or the Chat/Grumble one, frankly I don't need the drama but I can say I'm disappointed that this new site and some who are members here also, cannot see the negative disruption that is occurring with their drive-by's. Maybe you need to take a big step back and try to gain some objectivity, but trust me, it looks and feels and smells deliberate up close and very personal. Is the point of your site as some have stated to pursue sleuthing for missing cases, or is the intent there to take down SM? I have to wonder........but what I do know is you do have the power to make your mark upon this a positive and not a negative one - we all have that power.

Doesn't Natalee deserve better than this drama and distraction??? Isn't it about her?

It's not about you or me, and not even delicious frogs  ::MonkeyWink::




Thanks nonesuche, I think your perception of some things is right on.   ::MonkeyCool::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #788 12/31/08 -
Post by: Blue Moon on December 31, 2008, 11:02:02 PM
O.K. I am truly learning LOTS of stuff tonight.   I am only on page 45 of the last thread and my husband called it a night and said he didn't think I would make it to midnight to greet the New Year.  I told him don't be so sure of himself (he doesn't know how many pages more I have to read).


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #788 12/31/08 -
Post by: Keepthefaith on December 31, 2008, 11:03:48 PM
O.K. I am truly learning LOTS of stuff tonight.   I am only on page 45 of the last thread and my husband called it a night and said he didn't think I would make it to midnight to greet the New Year.  I told him don't be so sure of himself (he doesn't know how many pages more I have to read).

Still here Blue Moon.Give us updates on how your coming along and what your take is...Monkey very much!! ::MonkeyDance:: ::MonkeyDance::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #788 12/31/08 -
Post by: MuffyBee on December 31, 2008, 11:05:22 PM
O.K. I am truly learning LOTS of stuff tonight.   I am only on page 45 of the last thread and my husband called it a night and said he didn't think I would make it to midnight to greet the New Year.  I told him don't be so sure of himself (he doesn't know how many pages more I have to read).

You can do it (http://bestsmileys.com/cheering/1.gif)


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #788 12/31/08 -
Post by: texasmom on December 31, 2008, 11:09:47 PM
O.K. I am truly learning LOTS of stuff tonight.   I am only on page 45 of the last thread and my husband called it a night and said he didn't think I would make it to midnight to greet the New Year.  I told him don't be so sure of himself (he doesn't know how many pages more I have to read).

You can do it Blue Moon!!!!!!   ::MonkeyDance:: ::cartwheel:: ::MonkeyDance::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #788 12/31/08 -
Post by: Blue Moon on December 31, 2008, 11:17:37 PM
O.K. I am truly learning LOTS of stuff tonight.   I am only on page 45 of the last thread and my husband called it a night and said he didn't think I would make it to midnight to greet the New Year.  I told him don't be so sure of himself (he doesn't know how many pages more I have to read).

You can do it Blue Moon!!!!!!   ::MonkeyDance:: ::cartwheel:: ::MonkeyDance::

It is very educational.  I WILL DO IT before the night is over.  If I had known this was going on I would not have gone gambling.  But then again I really did enjoy it.  Had lots of fun.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #788 12/31/08 -
Post by: Blue Moon on December 31, 2008, 11:34:06 PM
O.K. I am up to the monkey on the sedgeway video.  Funny. Funny. I needed the laugh after reading an almost entire thread.   ::MonkeyLaugh:: ::MonkeyLaugh:: ::MonkeyLaugh::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #788 12/31/08 -
Post by: texasmom on December 31, 2008, 11:35:47 PM
O.K. I am up to the monkey on the sedgeway video.  Funny. Funny. I needed the laugh after reading an almost entire thread.   ::MonkeyLaugh:: ::MonkeyLaugh:: ::MonkeyLaugh::

By the time you finish, you will probably be really thankful that you went gambling; wish I had too!   ::MonkeyHaHa::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #788 12/31/08 -
Post by: Artcolley on December 31, 2008, 11:40:06 PM
O.K. I am up to the monkey on the sedgeway video.  Funny. Funny. I needed the laugh after reading an almost entire thread.   ::MonkeyLaugh:: ::MonkeyLaugh:: ::MonkeyLaugh::

By the time you finish, you will probably be really thankful that you went gambling; wish I had too!   ::MonkeyHaHa::

 ::MonkeyHaHa::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #788 12/31/08 -
Post by: Blue Moon on December 31, 2008, 11:40:19 PM
ldstlou wrote:
Tim Miller wasn't removed from anywhere...are you kidding me? You really think he would allow himself to be removed? He was following up a lead in Nicaragua.
------------------


I'm sorry to say - yes he was.  Along with Dateline.

Dec 30th, Kyle and Tim Miller discussed this issue in detail, but they didn't know how to handle it.  Then Kyle took a nap.  When he got up, Tim and Dateline had been ejected from the boat.

ldstlou, I don't know what fairy tales Kyle and others are now telling you, but Kyle's posts (with IP, date and time) are in their original form from when he posted them.  This item was discussed over several posts.

The Nicarauga thing didn't happen for a few more days after that, IIRC.



Exactly, Jen.  IIRC, Kyle stated that Dec 30th was "crushing" - that Tim Miller and Dateline were REMOVED from the boat.



At who's request would they have been removed from the ship?  By Mos or John Silvetti?  They is all unreal that this could have happened.  Kyle specifically asked us what we thought they should do IF they found Natalee's remains and it was a resounding "Take her remains and leave and bring her home to her family". 


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #788 12/31/08 -
Post by: Keepthefaith on December 31, 2008, 11:44:42 PM
ldstlou wrote:
Tim Miller wasn't removed from anywhere...are you kidding me? You really think he would allow himself to be removed? He was following up a lead in Nicaragua.
------------------


I'm sorry to say - yes he was.  Along with Dateline.

Dec 30th, Kyle and Tim Miller discussed this issue in detail, but they didn't know how to handle it.  Then Kyle took a nap.  When he got up, Tim and Dateline had been ejected from the boat.

ldstlou, I don't know what fairy tales Kyle and others are now telling you, but Kyle's posts (with IP, date and time) are in their original form from when he posted them.  This item was discussed over several posts.

The Nicarauga thing didn't happen for a few more days after that, IIRC.



Exactly, Jen.  IIRC, Kyle stated that Dec 30th was "crushing" - that Tim Miller and Dateline were REMOVED from the boat.



At who's request would they have been removed from the ship?  By Mos or John Silvetti?  They is all unreal that this could have happened.  Kyle specifically asked us what we thought they should do IF they found Natalee's remains and it was a resounding "Take her remains and leave and bring her home to her family". 

Silvetti from my understanding!Correct me if i'm wrong Monkey's.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #788 12/31/08 -
Post by: 2NJSons_Mom on December 31, 2008, 11:49:12 PM
Betcha Joran's got CRABS

If this is true and he is still in Thailand then he may just have Crispy Critters now.
http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2008/12/31/world/main4694580.shtml
New Year's Club Fire Kills 59 In Bangkok
Foreigners Among The Dead As Blaze Sweeps Through Posh Nightclub Jammed With Hundreds
Comments 1
BANGKOK, Thailand, Dec. 31, 2008


Guess you missed my comment to Grannytoad ...  ::MonkeyCool::

Well, I'm waaaay behind and DH had control of this PC....I tried son's mac reading to catch up but couldn't post and not sure why...so...iirc....and I think I do...Anna beat you to it, Nut...but that's okay...you're updating all over this forum.   ::MonkeyCool::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #788 12/31/08 -
Post by: Keepthefaith on January 01, 2009, 12:03:38 AM
Found that interesting~Happy New Year CapsLockWizard. ::MonkeyWink::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #788 12/31/08 -
Post by: klaasend on January 01, 2009, 12:04:41 AM
It's midnight on the east coast - HAPPY NEW YEAR!

(http://i118.photobucket.com/albums/o100/klaasen3/Sub5/fireworks.gif)


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #788 12/31/08 -
Post by: casa on January 01, 2009, 12:05:43 AM
Happy New Year to the east coast monkeys!


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #788 12/31/08 -
Post by: texasmom on January 01, 2009, 12:05:55 AM
It's midnight on the east coast - HAPPY NEW YEAR!

(http://i118.photobucket.com/albums/o100/klaasen3/Sub5/fireworks.gif)

Happy New Year Klaas!!!  ::MonkeyDance::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #788 12/31/08 -
Post by: Red on January 01, 2009, 12:06:01 AM
HAPPY NEW YEAR MONKEYS

(http://i84.photobucket.com/albums/k7/ncoutlander/happynewyear.gif)


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #788 12/31/08 -
Post by: texasmom on January 01, 2009, 12:08:27 AM



Happy New Year Red, and Mrs. Red!!!   ::MonkeyDance::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #788 12/31/08 -
Post by: klaasend on January 01, 2009, 12:08:34 AM
Thanks Red - Happy New Year to you and Mrs. Red as well!


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #788 12/31/08 -
Post by: Rooscrew on January 01, 2009, 12:09:21 AM
I want to wish y'all a Happy New Year!  ::MonkeyCool::

May 2009 be Natalee's year for JUSTICE. She deserves that so much and more. Aruba needs to be held accountable for everything they've done in this cover-up of her death.
My heart just breaks for Beth, she's done everything she can in her power. She has walked the high road so many times to get answers, but yet they've treated her so badly and still do to this day. I Hate 'em all!! 
I don't contribute alot with researching like so many wonderful Monkey's and  Natalee's Freebirds do. I admire & salute you all!!  ::MonkeyDance::  YOU ROCK!!
I do read everything that is posted and form my opinions on what I've read. I've been a member since June 2005 before the cage became the place to post about Natalee. Thru' the years good people have come and others have left, alot of those left because of egos. For me, I've stayed here because I share the same bond as most of you, Justice for Natalee first and foremost. I love SM because it's such a great place that you can think & form your own opinions, dissect theories, try to help others with missing relatives & the blessing to enrich your life by making friends.

Peaches ~ Your charm, wit, & determination will be missed greatly in this cage.
Thank-You so very much Kermit, Jen, Wingnut, Sharon, Rob, Angie, None, & Klaas, your words are tremendously powerful. All I can do is just shake my head and wonder why people have ulterior motives instead of staying focused on Natalee, her justice, her right to be back home on USA soil, to have her proper burial. It's just not right!! Natalee deserves sooooo much better than she's gotten. I'm sorry for this being so long.
Thank-You Red, Dugga, Klaas & all the Mods for making SM the best home. I really do appreciate all you do to make it a great place!!

Roos~


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #788 12/31/08 -
Post by: Blue Moon on January 01, 2009, 12:10:43 AM
If it is true that Kyle did not turn information over in a timely manner(Freebirds did),was attempting to broker with TV networks,as well as mislead people.What is the reasoning of defending him??

To clarify.I believe Kyle did those thing until proven otherwise!I can't defend someone when the foundation of their character is broken.JMOO

and I don't believe the information was not turned over to the FBI right away.

Regardless, as Jen states, Beth, JQK and the FBI have the info Kyle posted at Freebirds now. So what is their take on it?

Prove to me that the information was turned over by Kyle to the FBI,as well as the Holloway and what day??If someone else other than Kyle turned this information,after giving Kyle the opportunity and he chose not to.That is indefensable from my standpoint!Why defend him??

I don't have to prove anything to you.
Assume I am wrong if it makes you feel better...and Kermit saved the day and uncovered the "conspiracy" and handed everything over to the proper authorities as she states..so what is the end result? Do Beth, JQK and the FBI buy Kermit's theory....jeez...bottom line if kermit can prove to me Beth, JQK and the FBI are on board with the theory...excluding Lalas and I of course being in on it... ::MonkeyConfused:: ...then you might convince me.

Ya know, I think I have about read enough of this b.s.  This is nothing but "look, see, I talk to family members/Kyle".  Ego big time to me.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #788 12/31/08 -
Post by: Blue Moon on January 01, 2009, 12:13:40 AM
HAPPY NEW YEAR MONKEYS

(http://i84.photobucket.com/albums/k7/ncoutlander/happynewyear.gif)

Happy New Year to you Red, Mrs. Red.  Thanks for this board and what it gives to the families of the missing/murdered.  Thanks to all Klaas for what she endures day-in/day-out. We really appreciate her.  And a special thanks to all mods.You all are the greatest.  Thanks Dugga also.    (Back to catching up)


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #788 12/31/08 -
Post by: Keepthefaith on January 01, 2009, 12:14:19 AM
I want to wish y'all a Happy New Year!  ::MonkeyCool::

May 2009 be Natalee's year for JUSTICE. She deserves that so much and more. Aruba needs to be held accountable for everything they've done in this cover-up of her death.
My heart just breaks for Beth, she's done everything she can in her power. She has walked the high road so many times to get answers, but yet they've treated her so badly and still do to this day. I Hate 'em all!! 
I don't contribute alot with researching like so many wonderful Monkey's and  Natalee's Freebirds do. I admire & salute you all!!  ::MonkeyDance::  YOU ROCK!!
I do read everything that is posted and form my opinions on what I've read. I've been a member since June 2005 before the cage became the place to post about Natalee. Thru' the years good people have come and others have left, alot of those left because of egos. For me, I've stayed here because I share the same bond as most of you, Justice for Natalee first and foremost. I love SM because it's such a great place that you can think & form your own opinions, dissect theories, try to help others with missing relatives & the blessing to enrich your life by making friends.

Peaches ~ Your charm, wit, & determination will be missed greatly in this cage.
Thank-You so very much Kermit, Jen, Wingnut, Sharon, Rob, Angie, None, & Klaas, your words are tremendously powerful. All I can do is just shake my head and wonder why people have ulterior motives instead of staying focused on Natalee, her justice, her right to be back home on USA soil, to have her proper burial. It's just not right!! Natalee deserves sooooo much better than she's gotten. I'm sorry for this being so long.
Thank-You Red, Dugga, Klaas & all the Mods for making SM the best home. I really do appreciate all you do to make it a great place!!

Roos~

Very eloquent Roos.God Bless you!JUSTICE FOR NATALEE..... ::MonkeyDance::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #788 12/31/08 -
Post by: 2NJSons_Mom on January 01, 2009, 12:15:26 AM
It's midnight on the east coast - HAPPY NEW YEAR!

(http://i118.photobucket.com/albums/o100/klaasen3/Sub5/fireworks.gif)

Thanks, Klaas.

 
Happy New Year to all


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #788 12/31/08 -
Post by: Artcolley on January 01, 2009, 12:17:22 AM
HAPPY NEW YEAR EVERYBODY!!!


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #788 12/31/08 -
Post by: San on January 01, 2009, 12:17:41 AM
I want to wish y'all a Happy New Year!  ::MonkeyCool::

May 2009 be Natalee's year for JUSTICE. She deserves that so much and more. Aruba needs to be held accountable for everything they've done in this cover-up of her death.
My heart just breaks for Beth, she's done everything she can in her power. She has walked the high road so many times to get answers, but yet they've treated her so badly and still do to this day. I Hate 'em all!! 
I don't contribute alot with researching like so many wonderful Monkey's and  Natalee's Freebirds do. I admire & salute you all!!  ::MonkeyDance::  YOU ROCK!!
I do read everything that is posted and form my opinions on what I've read. I've been a member since June 2005 before the cage became the place to post about Natalee. Thru' the years good people have come and others have left, alot of those left because of egos. For me, I've stayed here because I share the same bond as most of you, Justice for Natalee first and foremost. I love SM because it's such a great place that you can think & form your own opinions, dissect theories, try to help others with missing relatives & the blessing to enrich your life by making friends.

Peaches ~ Your charm, wit, & determination will be missed greatly in this cage.
Thank-You so very much Kermit, Jen, Wingnut, Sharon, Rob, Angie, None, & Klaas, your words are tremendously powerful. All I can do is just shake my head and wonder why people have ulterior motives instead of staying focused on Natalee, her justice, her right to be back home on USA soil, to have her proper burial. It's just not right!! Natalee deserves sooooo much better than she's gotten. I'm sorry for this being so long.
Thank-You Red, Dugga, Klaas & all the Mods for making SM the best home. I really do appreciate all you do to make it a great place!!

Roos~

Nice post Roos.  Happy New Year.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #788 12/31/08 -
Post by: Keepthefaith on January 01, 2009, 12:18:36 AM
People are in 09'.What's it feel like Monkey's.. ::MonkeyLaugh:: ::MonkeyLaugh::

I'm still in 08'.Anything exciting happenin in 09'...  ::MonkeyLaugh:: ::MonkeyDance::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #788 12/31/08 -
Post by: klaasend on January 01, 2009, 12:20:28 AM
People are in 09'.What's it feel like Monkey's.. ::MonkeyLaugh:: ::MonkeyLaugh::

I'm still in 08'.Anything exciting happenin in 09'...  ::MonkeyLaugh:: ::MonkeyDance::

Yes, San tells me she is taking up smoking cigars in 09, lolol  ::MonkeyHaHa::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #788 12/31/08 -
Post by: Keepthefaith on January 01, 2009, 12:21:09 AM
People are in 09'.What's it feel like Monkey's.. ::MonkeyLaugh:: ::MonkeyLaugh::

I'm still in 08'.Anything exciting happenin in 09'...  ::MonkeyLaugh:: ::MonkeyDance::

Yes, San tells me she is taking up smoking cigars in 09, lolol  ::MonkeyHaHa::

 ::MonkeyLaugh:: Only if there Cohiba's..


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #788 12/31/08 -
Post by: Anna on January 01, 2009, 12:21:17 AM
And this is for Natalee


http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7s2colKQ-eE


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #788 12/31/08 -
Post by: San on January 01, 2009, 12:21:40 AM
People are in 09'.What's it feel like Monkey's.. ::MonkeyLaugh:: ::MonkeyLaugh::

I'm still in 08'.Anything exciting happenin in 09'...  ::MonkeyLaugh:: ::MonkeyDance::

Yes, San tells me she is taking up smoking cigars in 09, lolol  ::MonkeyHaHa::
::MonkeyHaHa::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #788 12/31/08 -
Post by: ospainter on January 01, 2009, 12:22:23 AM
People are in 09'.What's it feel like Monkey's.. ::MonkeyLaugh:: ::MonkeyLaugh::

I'm still in 08'.Anything exciting happenin in 09'...  ::MonkeyLaugh:: ::MonkeyDance::

Well DH is in bed snoring..ummm exciting for me lol

I'm old, doesn't take much to excite me anymore....LOL

Happy New Year


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #788 12/31/08 -
Post by: Keepthefaith on January 01, 2009, 12:25:35 AM
People are in 09'.What's it feel like Monkey's.. ::MonkeyLaugh:: ::MonkeyLaugh::

I'm still in 08'.Anything exciting happenin in 09'...  ::MonkeyLaugh:: ::MonkeyDance::

Well DH is in bed snoring..ummm exciting for me lol

I'm old, doesn't take much to excite me anymore....LOL

Happy New Year

Up her in Seattle Os! still waiting to break on through to the other side. ::cartwheel::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #788 12/31/08 -
Post by: 2NJSons_Mom on January 01, 2009, 12:25:59 AM
People are in 09'.What's it feel like Monkey's.. ::MonkeyLaugh:: ::MonkeyLaugh::

I'm still in 08'.Anything exciting happenin in 09'...  ::MonkeyLaugh:: ::MonkeyDance::

Well DH is in bed snoring..ummm exciting for me lol

I'm old, doesn't take much to excite me anymore....LOL

Happy New Year

 ::MonkeyHaHa::  Mine, too....Happy New Year...don't get too excited...I'm trying not to.   ::MonkeyHaHa::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #788 12/31/08 -
Post by: San on January 01, 2009, 12:27:54 AM
HAPPY NEW YEAR EVERYONE
(http://i34.photobucket.com/albums/d118/Sanddrops/2009_lg_clr.gif)


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #788 12/31/08 -
Post by: 2NJSons_Mom on January 01, 2009, 12:29:24 AM
Well, I'm going to say g'nite for the first time in 2009. 

Let Justice be served for Natalee Holloway. 


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #788 12/31/08 -
Post by: San on January 01, 2009, 12:31:58 AM
Well, I'm going to say g'nite for the first time in 2009. 

Let Justice be served for Natalee Holloway. 

Nite 2NJSons.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #788 12/31/08 -
Post by: Keepthefaith on January 01, 2009, 12:32:08 AM
Well, I'm going to say g'nite for the first time in 2009. 

Let Justice be served for Natalee Holloway. 

2 1/2 more hrs before i join the New Year!Goodnight 2njsons..Thanx.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #788 12/31/08 -
Post by: MuffyBee on January 01, 2009, 12:34:21 AM
Well, I'm going to say g'nite for the first time in 2009. 

Let Justice be served for Natalee Holloway. 

Good night 2nj, to you in 2009.  I'm still in 2008.  Will catch up with you soon... ::MonkeyHaHa::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #788 12/31/08 -
Post by: ospainter on January 01, 2009, 12:35:54 AM
People are in 09'.What's it feel like Monkey's.. ::MonkeyLaugh:: ::MonkeyLaugh::

I'm still in 08'.Anything exciting happenin in 09'...  ::MonkeyLaugh:: ::MonkeyDance::

Well DH is in bed snoring..ummm exciting for me lol

I'm old, doesn't take much to excite me anymore....LOL

Happy New Year

Up her in Seattle Os! still waiting to break on through to the other side. ::cartwheel::

Won't be too long..

I'm in MD..

OS



Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #788 12/31/08 -
Post by: klaasend on January 01, 2009, 12:36:03 AM
Well, I'm going to say g'nite for the first time in 2009. 

Let Justice be served for Natalee Holloway. 

Nite Nut 2NJ (oops)


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #788 12/31/08 -
Post by: ospainter on January 01, 2009, 12:38:31 AM
People are in 09'.What's it feel like Monkey's.. ::MonkeyLaugh:: ::MonkeyLaugh::

I'm still in 08'.Anything exciting happenin in 09'...  ::MonkeyLaugh:: ::MonkeyDance::

Well DH is in bed snoring..ummm exciting for me lol

I'm old, doesn't take much to excite me anymore....LOL

Happy New Year

 ::MonkeyHaHa::  Mine, too....Happy New Year...don't get too excited...I'm trying not to.   ::MonkeyHaHa::

LOL..

But I am going to try one of these  ::cartwheel::

Ouch that hurt..

Happy New Year

OS


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #788 12/31/08 -
Post by: texasmom on January 01, 2009, 12:38:57 AM
Well, I'm going to say g'nite for the first time in 2009. 

Let Justice be served for Natalee Holloway. 

Nite 2NJ!  Happy New Year!   ::MonkeyCool::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #788 12/31/08 -
Post by: texasmom on January 01, 2009, 12:40:59 AM
People are in 09'.What's it feel like Monkey's.. ::MonkeyLaugh:: ::MonkeyLaugh::

I'm still in 08'.Anything exciting happenin in 09'...  ::MonkeyLaugh:: ::MonkeyDance::

Well DH is in bed snoring..ummm exciting for me lol

I'm old, doesn't take much to excite me anymore....LOL

Happy New Year

 ::MonkeyHaHa::  Mine, too....Happy New Year...don't get too excited...I'm trying not to.   ::MonkeyHaHa::

LOL..

But I am going to try one of these  ::cartwheel::

Ouch that hurt..

Happy New Year

OS

 ::MonkeyHaHa::  I can wish, but I'm not gonna try it. 


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #788 12/31/08 -
Post by: Keepthefaith on January 01, 2009, 12:44:24 AM
How ya doin BlueMoon??Your head alright or is it spinnin?? ::cartwheel::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #788 12/31/08 -
Post by: San on January 01, 2009, 12:45:08 AM
How ya doin BlueMoon??Your head alright or is it spinnin?? ::cartwheel::

 ::MonkeyHaHa::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #788 12/31/08 -
Post by: MuffyBee on January 01, 2009, 12:46:09 AM
When I try to read from far back as BlueMoon is, my eyeballs get so tired.  (http://bestsmileys.com/movingeyes/6.gif)


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #788 12/31/08 -
Post by: Keepthefaith on January 01, 2009, 12:48:04 AM
How ya doin BlueMoon??Your head alright or is it spinnin?? ::cartwheel::

 ::MonkeyHaHa::

Gotta keep encouraging!We Monkey's are encouraging things..


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #788 12/31/08 -
Post by: ospainter on January 01, 2009, 12:48:16 AM


But I am going to try one of these  ::cartwheel::

Ouch that hurt..

Happy New Year

OS

 ::MonkeyHaHa::  I can wish, but I'm not gonna try it. 

 ::MonkeyLaugh::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #788 12/31/08 -
Post by: MuffyBee on January 01, 2009, 12:50:18 AM
How ya doin BlueMoon??Your head alright or is it spinnin?? ::cartwheel::

 ::MonkeyHaHa::

Gotta keep encouraging!We Monkey's are encouraging things..
(http://bestsmileys.com/cheering/5.gif)


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #788 12/31/08 -
Post by: MuffyBee on January 01, 2009, 12:51:47 AM
I hope that was encouraging to BlueMoon.  But there was a lot of wading through he-said she-saids if you know what I mean ::MonkeyHaHa::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #788 12/31/08 -
Post by: Keepthefaith on January 01, 2009, 12:54:22 AM
How ya doin BlueMoon??Your head alright or is it spinnin?? ::cartwheel::

 ::MonkeyHaHa::

Gotta keep encouraging!We Monkey's are encouraging things..
(http://bestsmileys.com/cheering/5.gif)


 ::MonkeyLaugh:: You guys are unbelievable Mods.I might have to put a diaper on so i don't pee all over myself from laughing so hard... ::MonkeyLaugh::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #788 12/31/08 -
Post by: Keepthefaith on January 01, 2009, 12:55:51 AM
I hope that was encouraging to BlueMoon.  But there was a lot of wading through he-said she-saids if you know what I mean ::MonkeyHaHa::

If we don't hear from BlueMoon soon we'll have to send out the Monkeypolice..


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #788 12/31/08 -
Post by: Blue Moon on January 01, 2009, 12:58:06 AM
How ya doin BlueMoon??Your head alright or is it spinnin?? ::cartwheel::

I am up to Angie coming out!  Glad to see her on here.  I for one always believed Kermit. She has backed up what she has told and until I see more from others (Kyle etc) then I remain behind the Frog! 

It is New Years here, I just took Tylenol for the headache, turned up my cough syrup for my cough (had to remind myself to put it down and go get a beer if I needed a drink).  This reading is blowing my mind!   ::MonkeyCool::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #788 12/31/08 -
Post by: Keepthefaith on January 01, 2009, 01:02:40 AM
How ya doin BlueMoon??Your head alright or is it spinnin?? ::cartwheel::

I am up to Angie coming out!  Glad to see her on here.  I for one always believed Kermit. She has backed up what she has told and until I see more from others (Kyle etc) then I remain behind the Frog! 

It is New Years here, I just took Tylenol for the headache, turned up my cough syrup for my cough (had to remind myself to put it down and go get a beer if I needed a drink).  This reading is blowing my mind!   ::MonkeyCool::

We're here when ya get here!I've got 2 hrs up here in Seattle...Go grab the beer ya may need it! ::MonkeyLaugh::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #788 12/31/08 -
Post by: Blue Moon on January 01, 2009, 01:02:50 AM
HAPPY NEW YEAR.

(DICK CLARK JUST ON TV-SAD. HE STILL IS HAVING PROBLEMS FROM HIS STROKE).


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #788 12/31/08 -
Post by: Red on January 01, 2009, 01:04:10 AM
HAPPY NEW YEARS CENTRAL TIME ZONE MONKEYS ... HAPPY NEW YEARS CENTRAL TIME ZONE MONKEYS ...



(http://augustachronicle.com/images/headlines/123199/lombardo.jpg)

Guy Lombardo Style


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #788 12/31/08 -
Post by: texasmom on January 01, 2009, 01:08:48 AM
Thanks Red!  Hubby barely looked up from the western he's watching to give me a hug and a kiss!  I hear fireworks!

 ::MonkeyHaHa::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #788 12/31/08 -
Post by: Blue Moon on January 01, 2009, 01:10:28 AM
Betcha Joran's got CRABS

CLASSIC.  This is breaking the monotony.    ::MonkeyLaugh::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #788 12/31/08 -
Post by: texasmom on January 01, 2009, 01:11:30 AM
Betcha Joran's got CRABS

CLASSIC.  This is breaking the monotony.    ::MonkeyLaugh::

 ::MonkeyHaHa::  Have you cussed yet?  Tell the truth!   ::MonkeyTongue::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #788 12/31/08 -
Post by: MuffyBee on January 01, 2009, 01:12:27 AM
Woo-hoo!  It's finally 2009 here   ::MonkeyDance::  Mmmmm.  Champagne. (http://bestsmileys.com/drinking/1.gif)


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #788 12/31/08 -
Post by: Blue Moon on January 01, 2009, 01:14:25 AM
Betcha Joran's got CRABS

CLASSIC.  This is breaking the monotony.    ::MonkeyLaugh::

 ::MonkeyHaHa::  Have you cussed yet?  Tell the truth!   ::MonkeyTongue::

Now did you really have to ask?  This is interesting.  Like a good book, I can't put it down.   ::MonkeyLaugh:: ::MonkeyConfused::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #788 12/31/08 -
Post by: Keepthefaith on January 01, 2009, 01:28:08 AM
Betcha Joran's got CRABS

CLASSIC.  This is breaking the monotony.    ::MonkeyLaugh::

 ::MonkeyHaHa::  Have you cussed yet?  Tell the truth!   ::MonkeyTongue::

Now did you really have to ask?  This is interesting.  Like a good book, I can't put it down.   ::MonkeyLaugh:: ::MonkeyConfused::

Where are the Cheerleaders as well as the tape for the finish line for BlueMoon?she's gotta be gettin close.... ::MonkeyDance:: ::MonkeyDance::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #788 12/31/08 -
Post by: cajun miracle on January 01, 2009, 01:28:38 AM
HAPPY NEW YEAR MONKEYS

(http://i84.photobucket.com/albums/k7/ncoutlander/happynewyear.gif)


HAPPY NEW YEAR TO ALL OF YOU GREAT MONKEYS!

PEACE ON THIS EARTH AND BRING NATALEE HOME.

Cajun Miracle


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #788 12/31/08 -
Post by: MuffyBee on January 01, 2009, 01:30:20 AM
Keep going BlueMoon!  You can DO it! 

(http://bestsmileys.com/cheering/5.gif)


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #788 12/31/08 -
Post by: Keepthefaith on January 01, 2009, 01:32:11 AM
Keep going BlueMoon!  You can DO it! 

(http://bestsmileys.com/cheering/5.gif)

Two bits,Four bits,Six bits a dollar all for BlueMoon stand up and Hollar. ::cartwheel:: ::cartwheel:: ::cartwheel:: ::cartwheel:: ::cartwheel:: ::cartwheel:: ::cartwheel:: ::cartwheel:: ::cartwheel::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #788 12/31/08 -
Post by: cajun miracle on January 01, 2009, 01:33:36 AM
People are in 09'.What's it feel like Monkey's.. ::MonkeyLaugh:: ::MonkeyLaugh::

I'm still in 08'.Anything exciting happenin in 09'...  ::MonkeyLaugh:: ::MonkeyDance::

Yes, San tells me she is taking up smoking cigars in 09, lolol  ::MonkeyHaHa::

Hey Klaas and San, Those cigars are sooooo good! Enjoy!


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #788 12/31/08 -
Post by: MuffyBee on January 01, 2009, 01:35:37 AM
People are in 09'.What's it feel like Monkey's.. ::MonkeyLaugh:: ::MonkeyLaugh::

I'm still in 08'.Anything exciting happenin in 09'...  ::MonkeyLaugh:: ::MonkeyDance::

Yes, San tells me she is taking up smoking cigars in 09, lolol  ::MonkeyHaHa::

Hey Klaas and San, Those cigars are sooooo good! Enjoy!

 (http://bestsmileys.com/smoking/3.gif)= San

Klaas has  quit smoking (http://bestsmileys.com/smoking/5.gif)


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #788 12/31/08 -
Post by: San on January 01, 2009, 01:37:58 AM
People are in 09'.What's it feel like Monkey's.. ::MonkeyLaugh:: ::MonkeyLaugh::

I'm still in 08'.Anything exciting happenin in 09'...  ::MonkeyLaugh:: ::MonkeyDance::

Yes, San tells me she is taking up smoking cigars in 09, lolol  ::MonkeyHaHa::

Hey Klaas and San, Those cigars are sooooo good! Enjoy!

(http://bestsmileys.com/smoking/6.gif) (http://bestsmileys.com/smoking/3.gif)
Klaas and San in 2009

 ::MonkeyHaHa:: I'm off to bed.  Have a good night everyone.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #788 12/31/08 -
Post by: MuffyBee on January 01, 2009, 01:39:12 AM
Good night San.  I removed that post you quoted, and replaced it with another, since I remembered Klaas quit smoking. 


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #788 12/31/08 -
Post by: Keepthefaith on January 01, 2009, 01:39:42 AM
People are in 09'.What's it feel like Monkey's.. ::MonkeyLaugh:: ::MonkeyLaugh::

I'm still in 08'.Anything exciting happenin in 09'...  ::MonkeyLaugh:: ::MonkeyDance::

Yes, San tells me she is taking up smoking cigars in 09, lolol  ::MonkeyHaHa::

Hey Klaas and San, Those cigars are sooooo good! Enjoy!

(http://bestsmileys.com/smoking/6.gif) (http://bestsmileys.com/smoking/3.gif)
Klaas and San in 2009

 ::MonkeyHaHa:: I'm off to bed.  Have a good night everyone.
Goodnight San.I'm still rootin for BlueMoon.Gotta see Bluemoon through the finish line... ::MonkeyDance::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #788 12/31/08 -
Post by: cajun miracle on January 01, 2009, 01:40:38 AM
People are in 09'.What's it feel like Monkey's.. ::MonkeyLaugh:: ::MonkeyLaugh::

I'm still in 08'.Anything exciting happenin in 09'...  ::MonkeyLaugh:: ::MonkeyDance::

Yes, San tells me she is taking up smoking cigars in 09, lolol  ::MonkeyHaHa::

Hey Klaas and San, Those cigars are sooooo good! Enjoy!

(http://bestsmileys.com/smoking/6.gif) (http://bestsmileys.com/smoking/3.gif)
Klaas and San in 2009

 ::MonkeyHaHa:: I'm off to bed.  Have a good night everyone.


Good night and happy 2009 to all!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #788 12/31/08 -
Post by: Blue Moon on January 01, 2009, 01:41:00 AM
I just don't understand why people like Mum and Lalas & idstlou and
all of the former posters here are so angry.
Anybody who reads all of this information should see the
truth to it.  They are nitpicking at the least little word.

Why are they so mad about it all?

I'll one up you with a question here.........

why are some at that site saying that JUG knew the MAIN goal of the Persistence for that trip was oil related?

 ::MonkeyConfused:: ::MonkeyConfused::

O.K. I am caught up.  The above, has anyone answered this?  First I read about Dave and MIP6 and now this on Jug knowing this was oil related?  I guess I can go to bed now-I welcomed the New Year catching up and I DID IT but now I have the BIGGEST headache of my laugh.  Good night all.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #788 12/31/08 -
Post by: Keepthefaith on January 01, 2009, 01:44:11 AM
I just don't understand why people like Mum and Lalas & idstlou and
all of the former posters here are so angry.
Anybody who reads all of this information should see the
truth to it.  They are nitpicking at the least little word.

Why are they so mad about it all?

I'll one up you with a question here.........

why are some at that site saying that JUG knew the MAIN goal of the Persistence for that trip was oil related?

 ::MonkeyConfused:: ::MonkeyConfused::

O.K. I am caught up.  The above, has anyone answered this?  First I read about Dave and MIP6 and now this on Jug knowing this was oil related?  I guess I can go to bed now-I welcomed the New Year catching up and I DID IT but now I have the BIGGEST headache of my laugh.  Good night all.

Goodnight Bluemoon!JUSTICE FOR NATALEE.......


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #788 12/31/08 -
Post by: texasmom on January 01, 2009, 01:45:02 AM
Congrats Blue Moon!  You made it!  No I don't think anyone said anything more about the Jug comment.  The Dave+MIP6 one is still bothering me!  I hope he's really not that naive!   ::MonkeyNoNo::



Goodnight everyone that's leaving for the monkey bunkey!



Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #788 12/31/08 -
Post by: klaasend on January 01, 2009, 01:49:42 AM
People are in 09'.What's it feel like Monkey's.. ::MonkeyLaugh:: ::MonkeyLaugh::

I'm still in 08'.Anything exciting happenin in 09'...  ::MonkeyLaugh:: ::MonkeyDance::

Yes, San tells me she is taking up smoking cigars in 09, lolol  ::MonkeyHaHa::

Hey Klaas and San, Those cigars are sooooo good! Enjoy!

(http://bestsmileys.com/smoking/6.gif) (http://bestsmileys.com/smoking/3.gif)
Klaas and San in 2009

 ::MonkeyHaHa:: I'm off to bed.  Have a good night everyone.

Nite San - I'll have to walk you through the quit smoking cigar program tomorrow, LOL  ::MonkeyHaHa::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #788 12/31/08 -
Post by: Keepthefaith on January 01, 2009, 01:51:05 AM
Congrats Blue Moon!  You made it!  No I don't think anyone said anything more about the Jug comment.  The Dave+MIP6 one is still bothering me!  I hope he's really not that naive!   ::MonkeyNoNo::



Goodnight everyone that's leaving for the monkey bunkey!



My hope would be that some counter intelligence is going on with some of the people that are so friendly so to speak with the family.that's my hope..


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #788 12/31/08 -
Post by: texasmom on January 01, 2009, 01:55:01 AM
I just happened to think of this...

Did Hotshot ever say what Dave was not a happy camper about specifically?  She made that comment last night and was going to say more about it today.  Did I miss it? 



Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #788 12/31/08 -
Post by: klaasend on January 01, 2009, 02:01:20 AM
Calling it a night now in the forum.  HAPPY NEW YEAR and GOODNIGHT ALL!


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #788 12/31/08 -
Post by: texasmom on January 01, 2009, 02:03:08 AM
Calling it a night now in the forum.  HAPPY NEW YEAR and GOODNIGHT ALL!

Nite Klaas!  Happy New Year!   ::MonkeyCool::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #788 12/31/08 -
Post by: Keepthefaith on January 01, 2009, 02:06:27 AM
I just happened to think of this...

Did Hotshot ever say what Dave was not a happy camper about specifically?  She made that comment last night and was going to say more about it today.  Did I miss it? 

This what your looking for TM



OK, this is  really bad taste......And if you edit this prior to taking my last name out of every quote i  am going to be really pissed. ((edit)) can't get away with this, and then not assume I will not post her name.. Dave did not  know all of this was going on here, he is not a happy camper.  Will post more tomorrow, i need sleep.




Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #788 12/31/08 -
Post by: Keepthefaith on January 01, 2009, 02:06:45 AM
I just happened to think of this...

Did Hotshot ever say what Dave was not a happy camper about specifically?  She made that comment last night and was going to say more about it today.  Did I miss it? 

This what your looking for TM



OK, this is  really bad taste......And if you edit this prior to taking my last name out of every quote i  am going to be really pissed. ((edit)) can't get away with this, and then not assume I will not post her name.. Dave did not  know all of this was going on here, he is not a happy camper.  Will post more tomorrow, i need sleep.





Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #788 12/31/08 -
Post by: Keepthefaith on January 01, 2009, 02:09:47 AM
Calling it a night now in the forum.  HAPPY NEW YEAR and GOODNIGHT ALL!

Goodnight Klaas!09' is  the year of JUSTICE... ::MonkeyDance::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #788 12/31/08 -
Post by: texasmom on January 01, 2009, 02:10:54 AM
I just happened to think of this...

Did Hotshot ever say what Dave was not a happy camper about specifically?  She made that comment last night and was going to say more about it today.  Did I miss it? 

This what your looking for TM



OK, this is  really bad taste......And if you edit this prior to taking my last name out of every quote i  am going to be really pissed. ((edit)) can't get away with this, and then not assume I will not post her name.. Dave did not  know all of this was going on here, he is not a happy camper.  Will post more tomorrow, i need sleep.




Yes, that's the comment..I was wondering if she'd said anymore about it but I just looked back and I don't think she did.  Thanks for finding that for me!


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #788 12/31/08 -
Post by: Keepthefaith on January 01, 2009, 02:12:01 AM
I just happened to think of this...

Did Hotshot ever say what Dave was not a happy camper about specifically?  She made that comment last night and was going to say more about it today.  Did I miss it? 

This what your looking for TM



OK, this is  really bad taste......And if you edit this prior to taking my last name out of every quote i  am going to be really pissed. ((edit)) can't get away with this, and then not assume I will not post her name.. Dave did not  know all of this was going on here, he is not a happy camper.  Will post more tomorrow, i need sleep.




Yes, that's the comment..I was wondering if she'd said anymore about it but I just looked back and I don't think she did.  Thanks for finding that for me!

We should find out tomorrow correct TM..


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #788 12/31/08 -
Post by: texasmom on January 01, 2009, 02:13:31 AM
I just happened to think of this...

Did Hotshot ever say what Dave was not a happy camper about specifically?  She made that comment last night and was going to say more about it today.  Did I miss it? 

This what your looking for TM



OK, this is  really bad taste......And if you edit this prior to taking my last name out of every quote i  am going to be really pissed. ((edit)) can't get away with this, and then not assume I will not post her name.. Dave did not  know all of this was going on here, he is not a happy camper.  Will post more tomorrow, i need sleep.




Yes, that's the comment..I was wondering if she'd said anymore about it but I just looked back and I don't think she did.  Thanks for finding that for me!

We should find out tomorrow correct TM..

I think it should have been today.  Maybe I'm spending too much time here!   ::MonkeyHaHa::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #788 12/31/08 -
Post by: Keepthefaith on January 01, 2009, 02:15:11 AM
I just happened to think of this...

Did Hotshot ever say what Dave was not a happy camper about specifically?  She made that comment last night and was going to say more about it today.  Did I miss it? 

This what your looking for TM



OK, this is  really bad taste......And if you edit this prior to taking my last name out of every quote i  am going to be really pissed. ((edit)) can't get away with this, and then not assume I will not post her name.. Dave did not  know all of this was going on here, he is not a happy camper.  Will post more tomorrow, i need sleep.




Yes, that's the comment..I was wondering if she'd said anymore about it but I just looked back and I don't think she did.  Thanks for finding that for me!

We should find out tomorrow correct TM..

I think it should have been today.  Maybe I'm spending too much time here!   ::MonkeyHaHa::

I think your right but give me a second to verify that post was on the 30th~Be back in a secon!


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #788 12/31/08 -
Post by: Keepthefaith on January 01, 2009, 02:23:54 AM
You're right TM.She did post more today.My concern is that she gives the impression that she is speaking for the Holloway's which i find appalling.Poster's need to quit speaking on behalf of people!JMOO

"Either you are with the Holloways or not, and when  you talk the  persistance down,  you are talking down about the holloways.... That is a back stabbing to them. No-one knows more then  us what they were  up against in aruba, more then we do."


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #788 12/31/08 -
Post by: texasmom on January 01, 2009, 02:25:21 AM
You're right TM.She did post more today.My concern is that she gives the impression that she is speaking for the Holloway's which i find appalling.Poster's need to quit speaking on behalf of people!JMOO

"Either you are with the Holloways or not, and when  you talk the  persistance down,  you are talking down about the holloways.... That is a back stabbing to them. No-one knows more then  us what they were  up against in aruba, more then we do."

I agree Keepthefaith.  Thanks for looking that up!


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #788 12/31/08 -
Post by: texasmom on January 01, 2009, 02:28:51 AM
I think I'm going to call it a night!

I've been reading a book that Frank talked about here "The Shack", I've got about 40 pages left; I've really enjoyed it.

Frank, if you stop by; THANKS!!!   ::MonkeyCool::


Goodnight everyone!  and Happy New Year!



Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #788 12/31/08 -
Post by: Keepthefaith on January 01, 2009, 02:29:23 AM
You're right TM.She did post more today.My concern is that she gives the impression that she is speaking for the Holloway's which i find appalling.Poster's need to quit speaking on behalf of people!JMOO

"Either you are with the Holloways or not, and when  you talk the  persistance down,  you are talking down about the holloways.... That is a back stabbing to them. No-one knows more then  us what they were  up against in aruba, more then we do."

I agree Keepthefaith.  Thanks for looking that up!


I got a feeling Jug,Beth,as well as Dave can speak for themselves!


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #788 12/31/08 -
Post by: Keepthefaith on January 01, 2009, 02:30:02 AM
I think I'm going to call it a night!

I've been reading a book that Frank talked about here "The Shack", I've got about 40 pages left; I've really enjoyed it.

Frank, if you stop by; THANKS!!!   ::MonkeyCool::


Goodnight everyone!  and Happy New Year!



G-night TM..


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #788 12/31/08 -
Post by: texasmom on January 01, 2009, 02:32:12 AM
(http://i302.photobucket.com/albums/nn82/texasmom_55/NataleeSoBeautifl.jpg)

JUSTICE FOR NATALEE!!!!


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #788 12/31/08 -
Post by: ospainter on January 01, 2009, 02:34:01 AM
Hi Mere,

Had to sign back in to tell you Happy New Year.

You have been missed.

HUGS,

OS


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #788 12/31/08 -
Post by: texasmom on January 01, 2009, 02:34:32 AM
You're right TM.She did post more today.My concern is that she gives the impression that she is speaking for the Holloway's which i find appalling.Poster's need to quit speaking on behalf of people!JMOO

"Either you are with the Holloways or not, and when  you talk the  persistance down,  you are talking down about the holloways.... That is a back stabbing to them. No-one knows more then  us what they were  up against in aruba, more then we do."

I agree Keepthefaith.  Thanks for looking that up!


I got a feeling Jug,Beth,as well as Dave can speak for themselves!

Yes they can, they may not want to post here but I'm sure they all have the contact information for the Administrators here.  


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #788 12/31/08 -
Post by: ospainter on January 01, 2009, 02:53:07 AM
ok 1 more O/T

Hi Casa,

Happy New Year.

HUGS,

OS


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #788 12/31/08 -
Post by: wreck on January 01, 2009, 03:12:59 AM
O/T Wreck....I was wondering about Your friend that was hurt in the robbery attempt....How Is He doing?   
I'm way behind, but will answer now. He is much better. Shattered rib, torn bicep, and only minor internal injuries. He was very lucky, he says that during the struggle, the gun "clicked" but no shot actually fired. He was relesed from the hospital about 5 pm this evening.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #788 12/31/08 -
Post by: finngirl on January 01, 2009, 03:45:20 AM

Ummm, are these posts written by the same person?  The second post contains parts that are more literate than the first post.  Almost like the second post is written by someone who has a good grasp of the English language, but is purposely trying to disguise that.

 :wink:

Yes, Finngirl posted something last night and it was very insightful about the initials and how Caps was telling them something that was not true. Since he lives in Aruba, one would think he would know and he didn't.

Finngirl caught it! Good job!

ya know, I made that post in april

I'd noticed things/pointed them out,
as did many others

but we got the brush-off ...
all questions were pushed aside

the train had left the station
and it had only one pre-determined destination:
Capsville

I, along w/ many others, spent months/years
in the codetalkers forum
and we need/deserve an explanation



Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #788 12/31/08 -
Post by: wreck on January 01, 2009, 04:00:04 AM
Big frickin' deal. Simean is Clyde Burke and we are not positive who "Shango" is. Where does that get us??? BOTH of these nimrods know exactly what happened but yet are still are playing games.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #788 12/31/08 -
Post by: billb's daughter on January 01, 2009, 04:30:54 AM
Big frickin' deal. Simean is Clyde Burke and we are not positive who "Shango" is. Where does that get us??? BOTH of these nimrods know exactly what happened but yet are still are playing games.
Not many here...I agree Wreck....WTF about simeon and shango...that gets us nowhere.
I'm conflicted about caps...wanted to believe he had the - what happened to Natalee - theory, and Kermit had the "disposal site of Natalee". Now I just don't know whether caps is sincere and off target, or misleading us or? The recent posters trying to discredit Kermit also paints a story about their motives...it is horse $hit in MHO...and their apparent ties with caps doesn't do him any favors..
But I do stand with Kermit...she backs up her posts, and the fact that so many from Freebirds resigned from that blog to back Kermit speaks volumes on their integrity and honor for justice for Natalee..
I think the cage contents and tracking that to ground is the most important thing we can do for Natalee and her family getting closure. I do hope JQK and/or Greta and/or Peter DV can forward that effort in the coming weeks..
the diversions perpetrated by idstlou and hotshot and muminohio are annoying, but won't derail those that are truly seeking Justice for natalee...


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #788 12/31/08 -
Post by: billb's daughter on January 01, 2009, 04:44:44 AM
The focus now needs to be on getting the arubans to acknowledge that contents of the cage were   recovered by aruban divers on Jan 7, 2008, and provide info to whatever was recovered from the cage. Tim Miller (my Hero) and Kyle can give first hand testimony of what they witnessed to the FBI....that needs to be pursued , along with an investigation of all persistence crew members that were on board during the search.  The FBI should lead that investigation to collect testimony in the disappearance/murder of Natalee....obstruction of justice charges should be filed against any crew member that may have withheld evidence of a crime...


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #788 12/31/08 -
Post by: finngirl on January 01, 2009, 05:18:19 AM

the glorification of Caps
(including providing protection for him)
by members of our community
was an orchestrated event lasting 12 months

and requires explanation

so, yah, a big frickin' deal



Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #788 12/31/08 -
Post by: Nut44x4 on January 01, 2009, 07:16:14 AM
Happy New year from one Monkey to all the Monkeysssssss!

http://tinyurl.com/75k8rd


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #788 12/31/08 -
Post by: MumInOhio on January 01, 2009, 08:18:02 AM
Big frickin' deal. Simean is Clyde Burke and we are not positive who "Shango" is. Where does that get us??? BOTH of these nimrods know exactly what happened but yet are still are playing games.
Not many here...I agree Wreck....WTF about simeon and shango...that gets us nowhere.
I'm conflicted about caps...wanted to believe he had the - what happened to Natalee - theory, and Kermit had the "disposal site of Natalee". Now I just don't know whether caps is sincere and off target, or misleading us or? The recent posters trying to discredit Kermit also paints a story about their motives...it is horse $hit in MHO...and their apparent ties with caps doesn't do him any favors..
But I do stand with Kermit...she backs up her posts, and the fact that so many from Freebirds resigned from that blog to back Kermit speaks volumes on their integrity and honor for justice for Natalee..
I think the cage contents and tracking that to ground is the most important thing we can do for Natalee and her family getting closure. I do hope JQK and/or Greta and/or Peter DV can forward that effort in the coming weeks..
the diversions perpetrated by idstlou and hotshot and muminohio are annoying, but won't derail those that are truly seeking Justice for natalee...

Billb...I am sorry you find my posts a diversion and annoying. That is your opinion and you are entitled to it.



Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #788 12/31/08 -
Post by: MumInOhio on January 01, 2009, 08:23:28 AM

the glorification of Caps
(including providing protection for him)
by members of our community
was an orchestrated event lasting 12 months

and requires explanation

so, yah, a big frickin' deal



Hi Finn... Tibro and I questioned Caps' English in Shango along time ago. I asked many questions and was told to stop questioning everything that he posted. IIRC, I was even told to back up my posts...which in itself was a joke.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #788 12/31/08 -
Post by: MumInOhio on January 01, 2009, 08:35:26 AM
Keepthefaith...From memory on November 18th.

Van der Straten's Niece? made a post in the SM Forum, Greta either had a show or made an annoucement about her show, Red received an email from Steve Cohen and there are more, but I am sorry I do not recall now since I have finished catching up. If I get my computer back tomorrow and my timeline is still there, I will check on the others. If not I will have to search my emails and find what I have on that date.

Several Monkeys tried to answer your questions the first week you came back to the Forum. I was one and I have continued to try and answer your questions. You keep posting the same questions as if they are not being answered.

Either you are missing my posts or ignoring them. Guess that would be your choice, but I find it very frustrating when I have tried to explain my posts and answer your questions.

I don't believe I mentioned the word motivation, I think you did. I have never been one for all the coincidences and am extremely suspicious regarding this case. This is what led me to work on an extended timeline. Because you aren't acknowledging that your posts are being answered is why I posted what I did.

If you just missed them, then I apologize.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #788 12/31/08 -
Post by: Edward on January 01, 2009, 08:41:08 AM
Big frickin' deal. Simean is Clyde Burke and we are not positive who "Shango" is. Where does that get us??? BOTH of these nimrods know exactly what happened but yet are still are playing games.

 :smt023


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #788 12/31/08 -
Post by: MumInOhio on January 01, 2009, 08:48:55 AM
Kermit...The first posts I referred to were from I believe November 17th. and What I was referring to was the different ponds. What you posted was taken directly from posts in Shango.  I followed your links and read the discussions. There was also a post about Clyde Burke and Simian, which I have posted about. It concerned Clyde being Simian and Alex Mathew being Shango. The discussions in that thread were about who was Shango and who ws Simian. That was not what came across in your post.

The two questions I asked were about Caps and yourself having email contact, which has now been answered, Thank You. The other was from a post of Memphis', which I quoted, where I asked if there was any way that you could possibly have misinterpreted what Kyle said as did the other poster. Maybe you missed the post.

I was under the impression that Monkeys ask questions, that is how we get answers. My questions may not be important to others but they are to me.

My questions to your posts, are being treated the same way as my questions to Cap's posts were. I was the bad guy then, and now I see I am the bad guy again.

Please help me here, as I am not quite sure of what I have to do to be "forgiven". Do I just stop asking questions and questioning posts? LOL...Kermit...You know that is not going to happen!

Kermit...I have another question for you regarding some posts in the Shango thread. When I can find the posts and the backup, I will post it over there. I have wanted the answers to this for many months now and hopefully you can help me understand why these discussions led to where they did.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #788 12/31/08 -
Post by: hotping on January 01, 2009, 08:52:41 AM
O/T Wreck....I was wondering about Your friend that was hurt in the robbery attempt....How Is He doing?   
I'm way behind, but will answer now. He is much better. Shattered rib, torn bicep, and only minor internal injuries. He was very lucky, he says that during the struggle, the gun "clicked" but no shot actually fired. He was relesed from the hospital about 5 pm this evening.
I'm Glad to hear that He is doing so well......It sounds like He is One Lucky Guy....  ::MonkeyDance::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #788 12/31/08 -
Post by: hotping on January 01, 2009, 08:54:53 AM
I think I'm going to call it a night!

I've been reading a book that Frank talked about here "The Shack", I've got about 40 pages left; I've really enjoyed it.

Frank, if you stop by; THANKS!!!   ::MonkeyCool::


Goodnight everyone!  and Happy New Year!


TM I'm reading the same book.....I'm not as far along as You are....but I agree so far it it is Very Good......  ::MonkeyCool::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #788 12/31/08 -
Post by: hotping on January 01, 2009, 09:08:17 AM
Good Morning Monkeys and Guests... Happy New Year!


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #788 12/31/08 -
Post by: MumInOhio on January 01, 2009, 09:09:40 AM
Another thing I am totally confused on. Since Caps made his appearance in the Shango thread, about a week before his first post in this Forum, I took an interest in him.

So do I have this right...all the times I have caught Caps logging in from Aruba and going to a particular page using more than one IP are from a "device"?

But the times that others caught him logging on he was not using "device" and he was not in Aruba?

I don't have a clue what dates I happened upon him logging in, but I do know that they were from Aruba...Except one. Maybe my computer will be ready tomorrow and I can check.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #788 12/31/08 -
Post by: Magnolia on January 01, 2009, 09:21:39 AM
Another thing I am totally confused on. Since Caps made his appearance in the Shango thread, about a week before his first post in this Forum, I took an interest in him.

So do I have this right...all the times I have caught Caps logging in from Aruba and going to a particular page using more than one IP are from a "device"?

But the times that others caught him logging on he was not using "device" and he was not in Aruba?

I don't have a clue what dates I happened upon him logging in, but I do know that they were from Aruba...Except one. Maybe my computer will be ready tomorrow and I can check.

Mum, do you think Caps could have been more than one person?


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #788 12/31/08 -
Post by: Buckeye on January 01, 2009, 09:22:32 AM
I'm not one for poster vs. poster issues.  I believe anyone can be anybody in cyberspace.

Mum

Your posts always challenged me to think.  I have always enjoyed your research.  Me, not caring who is who and all their connections or not, doesn't change what I find interesting.


Happy New Year, everyone.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #788 12/31/08 -
Post by: Magnolia on January 01, 2009, 09:23:53 AM
I am sorry that I messed up your post.

My question was: do you think Caps could have been more than one person?

[Edited - Fixed your post]


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #788 12/31/08 -
Post by: San on January 01, 2009, 09:24:00 AM
GOOD MORNING EVERYONE AND HAPPY NEW YEAR TO ALL.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #788 12/31/08 -
Post by: Magnolia on January 01, 2009, 09:26:19 AM
Good Morning Monkeys and Guests... Happy New Year!

Happy New Year, Hotping.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #788 12/31/08 -
Post by: Magnolia on January 01, 2009, 09:29:11 AM
GOOD MORNING EVERYONE AND HAPPY NEW YEAR TO ALL.

Thanks for the edit, San, and Happy New Year to you!


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #788 12/31/08 -
Post by: MumInOhio on January 01, 2009, 09:34:46 AM
I am sorry that I messed up your post.

My question was: do you think Caps could have been more than one person?

[Edited - Fixed your post]

Yes Magnolia.

Buckeye...Thank You...I really appreciate that coming from you...But I guess I tend to overthink things

Happy New Year Everyone.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #788 12/31/08 -
Post by: San on January 01, 2009, 09:39:42 AM
Mum it is always good to ask questions.  I enjoy reading your posts.

The part that bothered me was when two people came on here and made comments in their posts that were uncalled for.

HotShot - Now lets see some of you do some walking and get up and do something about Natalaee being missing.

Idstlou - What is wrong with you people?

There is nothing wrong with us questioning.  They both threatened and included everyone.  In my opinion if they don't like the line of questioning then leave.  They are not going to stop people from questioning.  Just because people don't plaster themselves all over doesn't mean people aren't doing anything.

I encourage everyone to keep questioning.  If someone doesn't want to answer the question that's fine but just remember the questions will be asked again.

We all want answers.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #788 12/31/08 -
Post by: Edward on January 01, 2009, 09:48:20 AM
Caps and Shango and simian are hidden.. you can only guess who they are and they all could be the same person or withing the same group all posting under these names..
 But look at Nicaragua and the time being close to 3 years later..That is a real person who meets Tim and a embassy official.. he is misleading them in your face and he is on film..
Still he appears to be part of the same group.. 3 years later !
Along with others like the reporter who secretly meets Beth with stories of a girl taking off in a helicopter and some strange fellow who follows Beth around giving her the creeps.. real people.
 If nothing else it shows this is far beyond a few boys who rape and murder and dispose of Natalee.. throw in ale hiding the true contents in the trap and it proves there is a very large group we are dealing with..all with the same intent.. to keep everyone off track and away from the truth..
 it is proof positive.. the people at this level are very big in money and influence over others..
far beyond the 3 boobs.. even paulus and buddies could not pull off ALL we have witnessed.
every time you take off on a road that shango is telling the truth..the enemy is winning.
 


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #788 12/31/08 -
Post by: San on January 01, 2009, 09:54:01 AM
Caps and Shango and simian are hidden.. you can only guess who they are and they all could be the same person or withing the same group all posting under these names..
 But look at Nicaragua and the time being close to 3 years later..That is a real person who meets Tim and a embassy official.. he is misleading them in your face and he is on film..
Still he appears to be part of the same group.. 3 years later !
Along with others like the reporter who secretly meets Beth with stories of a girl taking off in a helicopter and some strange fellow who follows Beth around giving her the creeps.. real people.
 If nothing else it shows this is far beyond a few boys who rape and murder and dispose of Natalee.. throw in ale hiding the true contents in the trap and it proves there is a very large group we are dealing with..all with the same intent.. to keep everyone off track and away from the truth..
it is proof positive.. the people at this level are very big in money and influence over others..
far beyond the 3 boobs.. even paulus and buddies could not pull off ALL we have witnessed.

every time you take off on a road that shango is telling the truth..the enemy is winning.
 

Like Art Wood said on Dana "This was a professional coverup".


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #788 12/31/08 -
Post by: Edward on January 01, 2009, 09:59:39 AM
I would rather chase Marcos and the reporter for the truth as they are real people we may be able to find.. Tim and Dave could help Find them..
Then we might get someplace.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #788 12/31/08 -
Post by: hotping on January 01, 2009, 10:08:49 AM
Good Morning Monkeys and Guests... Happy New Year!

Happy New Year, Hotping.
Thanks Magnolia....Happy New Year to You Too!  ::cartwheel:: 


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #788 12/31/08 -
Post by: klaasend on January 01, 2009, 10:27:21 AM
http://www.tv-visie.nl/nieuws/nederland/2008-beste-jaar-ooit-voor-sbs-groep_26977/

(snipped and translated through google)

With more than 7 million viewers, the broadcast of Peter R. de Vries, Crime Reporter "over the disappearance of Natalee Holloway by far the most watched program of the past year. In addition to SBS scored 6 'Popstars',' Domino Day ',' Undercover in the Netherlands', 'Holland's Got Talent, "" The New Uri Geller and the surprise of last summer, "Red My Holiday," high in the list best viewed programs of the family station. Furthermore, SBS 6 years as the Christmas station in the Netherlands which resulted in the best month ever with a market share of 15.3% in December


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #788 12/31/08 -
Post by: COLOMBO on January 01, 2009, 10:49:18 AM
Another thing I am totally confused on. Since Caps made his appearance in the Shango thread, about a week before his first post in this Forum, I took an interest in him.

So do I have this right...all the times I have caught Caps logging in from Aruba and going to a particular page using more than one IP are from a "device"?

But the times that others caught him logging on he was not using "device" and he was not in Aruba?

I don't have a clue what dates I happened upon him logging in, but I do know that they were from Aruba...Except one. Maybe my computer will be ready tomorrow and I can check.



Internet Cafe? :scratch:


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #788 12/31/08 -
Post by: klaasend on January 01, 2009, 10:53:31 AM
Another thing I am totally confused on. Since Caps made his appearance in the Shango thread, about a week before his first post in this Forum, I took an interest in him.

So do I have this right...all the times I have caught Caps logging in from Aruba and going to a particular page using more than one IP are from a "device"?

But the times that others caught him logging on he was not using "device" and he was not in Aruba?

I don't have a clue what dates I happened upon him logging in, but I do know that they were from Aruba...Except one. Maybe my computer will be ready tomorrow and I can check.



Internet Cafe? :scratch:

Very possible Columbo that anyone including Caps could be posting from an Internet Cafe.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #788 12/31/08 -
Post by: Anna on January 01, 2009, 11:25:49 AM
I would rather chase Marcos and the reporter for the truth as they are real people we may be able to find.. Tim and Dave could help Find them..
Then we might get someplace.


I thought Marcos was a no-show in Nicaragua.

Was he just a ruse to get Tim off the Persistence and occupied elsewhere?


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #788 12/31/08 -
Post by: Red on January 01, 2009, 11:29:12 AM
I hope everyone is waking up to a joyous and Happy New Year 2009.

Thank you so much all for making SM the fantastic community that it is. Scared Monkeys has the uniqueness of combining a front page blog and forum. Believe it or not, SM was one of the first on the internet to ever do it. I guess imitation is the best form of flattery.

What it has done is provide a strong community of facts, people, opinions and sleuthing that is read by so many (5M visitors and 12M + page views). However, there is another element that makes it much more different & special.  It was never more evident of just how special and different SM is as when one of our own, Peaches, passed away. We are about discussing cases, trying to get justice, helping with search in whatever capacity ... however SM is most about being human and doing the right things that show the character of the site and all its members and readers.

Thank you to the mods for all the great work in 2008 and a pre-thanks for 2009. Special thanks to Klaas as well.

May 2009 be filled with the answers and justice that we all look for in so many cases. May the victims of crimes finally get justice. Hopefully we will not find ourselves discussing so many crime and missing persons cases, however, sadly that is usually never the case.

Looking forward to a great 2009 and look forward to all of you being a apart of it.

Thanks


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #788 12/31/08 -
Post by: texasmom on January 01, 2009, 11:33:45 AM
O/T Wreck....I was wondering about Your friend that was hurt in the robbery attempt....How Is He doing?   
I'm way behind, but will answer now. He is much better. Shattered rib, torn bicep, and only minor internal injuries. He was very lucky, he says that during the struggle, the gun "clicked" but no shot actually fired. He was relesed from the hospital about 5 pm this evening.

Thanks for the update wreck, I'm so glad he is better!


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #788 12/31/08 -
Post by: Anna on January 01, 2009, 11:35:00 AM

Ummm, are these posts written by the same person?  The second post contains parts that are more literate than the first post.  Almost like the second post is written by someone who has a good grasp of the English language, but is purposely trying to disguise that.

 :wink:

Yes, Finngirl posted something last night and it was very insightful about the initials and how Caps was telling them something that was not true. Since he lives in Aruba, one would think he would know and he didn't.

Finngirl caught it! Good job!

ya know, I made that post in april

I'd noticed things/pointed them out,
as did many others

but we got the brush-off ...
all questions were pushed aside

the train had left the station
and it had only one pre-determined destination:
Capsville

I, along w/ many others, spent months/years
in the codetalkers forum
and we need/deserve an explanation




Yes, that bit with the initials was absolutely ridiculous and I believe I also posted at the time that they were NOT in any reverse order.

I also don't think much has ever been added to the Shango/Simian interpretations after the original Codetalkers.  At least, I never saw anything new that was convincing in the least.  Basically, all of that was covered in the first year and a half.

But I am not a big fan of S/S and know they also contributed erroneous information at times.  Seemed to me to be on the outside looking in, their theories about what goes on more than facts related to Natalee. 

What exactly did they contribute that was not apparent through other normal channels?  Poster Selena at RWV was all over the Chicago Mob connections of Posner, Murder Mansion, etc. from the get go.  One of them posted Paulus would be arrested a couple of hours before it made international news, etc. 

They just didn't know a whole lot more than was public knowledge in the end.  And while I always catch it for mentioning it, there is that Marvel Comics terminology.  Just more jerking our chains to watch reaction.

MO but as we all seem to be pointing out these days, I am entitled to have it.  They told us nothing we did not already know or would not have found out on our own.



Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #788 12/31/08 -
Post by: Blue Moon on January 01, 2009, 11:40:02 AM
I had a good nights sleep after catching up.  I still want to know if what jen said about Jug knowing the ship was going on an oil expedition is true.  If so then who really set up who in tis expedition?  Someone contacted Dave (John Silvetti I think) then who setup that person to get in touch with Dave? 

Natalee's Freebirds have been around for a long time.  A very, very long time ago I remember reading on this board that someone suggested putting together people from all blogs to focus/investigate this case only.  Is this how NF came into existence?    I admire all the Freebird's who came to Kermit's defense.  Great job to all involved.  Doing the right thing is all Natalee and her family deserve.  I am having a hard time understanding WHY some people believe confidentiality is more important than doing the right thing when it comes to Natalee. 


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #788 12/31/08 -
Post by: SS on January 01, 2009, 11:40:21 AM
Kermit - I have spent hours thinking and now, as usual, I have a lot of questions.  Would you please tell us more about the pond and why you think the sneaker and some human remains have been put there.  Do you know who drained the pond in March - was it ALE , Jossy, Ecotech, Silvetti, or nobody?  We were told that 40 - 50 Dutch forensic experts searched the dry pond and the surrounding neighborhood at night under the lights.  Last night the Freebirds were saying that this didn't happen.  If the pond story isn't true, then the pond witness isn't true.  Is the Matty Apt. story true? 


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #788 12/31/08 -
Post by: texasmom on January 01, 2009, 11:42:42 AM
I hope everyone is waking up to a joyous and Happy New Year 2009.

Thank you so much all for making SM the fantastic community that it is. Scared Monkeys has the uniqueness of combining a front page blog and forum. Believe it or not, SM was one of the first on the internet to ever do it. I guess imitation is the best form of flattery.

What it has done is provide a strong community of facts, people, opinions and sleuthing that is read by so many (5M visitors and 12M + page views). However, there is another element that makes it much more different & special.  It was never more evident of just how special and different SM is as when one of our own, Peaches, passed away. We are about discussing cases, trying to get justice, helping with search in whatever capacity ... however SM is most about being human and doing the right things that show the character of the site and all its members and readers.

Thank you to the mods for all the great work in 2008 and a pre-thanks for 2009. Special thanks to Klaas as well.

May 2009 be filled with the answers and justice that we all look for in so many cases. May the victims of crimes finally get justice. Hopefully we will not find ourselves discussing so many crime and missing persons cases, however, sadly that is usually never the case.

Looking forward to a great 2009 and look forward to all of you being a apart of it.

Thanks

Thank you Red!  I'm extremely proud to be a Scared Monkey!   ::MonkeyDance:: ::MonkeyCool::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #788 12/31/08 -
Post by: hotping on January 01, 2009, 11:46:13 AM
Kermit - I have spent hours thinking and now, as usual, I have a lot of questions.  Would you please tell us more about the pond and why you think the sneaker and some human remains have been put there.  Do you know who drained the pond in March - was it ALE , Jossy, Ecotech, Silvetti, or nobody?  We were told that 40 - 50 Dutch forensic experts searched the dry pond and the surrounding neighborhood at night under the lights.  Last night the Freebirds were saying that this didn't happen.  If the pond story isn't true, then the pond witness isn't true.  Is the Matty Apt. story true? 
SS... Great Questions....I hope that Kermit can answer Them...  ::MonkeyCool::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #788 12/31/08 -
Post by: hotping on January 01, 2009, 11:49:34 AM
I hope everyone is waking up to a joyous and Happy New Year 2009.

Thank you so much all for making SM the fantastic community that it is. Scared Monkeys has the uniqueness of combining a front page blog and forum. Believe it or not, SM was one of the first on the internet to ever do it. I guess imitation is the best form of flattery.

What it has done is provide a strong community of facts, people, opinions and sleuthing that is read by so many (5M visitors and 12M + page views). However, there is another element that makes it much more different & special.  It was never more evident of just how special and different SM is as when one of our own, Peaches, passed away. We are about discussing cases, trying to get justice, helping with search in whatever capacity ... however SM is most about being human and doing the right things that show the character of the site and all its members and readers.

Thank you to the mods for all the great work in 2008 and a pre-thanks for 2009. Special thanks to Klaas as well.

May 2009 be filled with the answers and justice that we all look for in so many cases. May the victims of crimes finally get justice. Hopefully we will not find ourselves discussing so many crime and missing persons cases, however, sadly that is usually never the case.

Looking forward to a great 2009 and look forward to all of you being a apart of it.

Thanks
Thanks Red for providing a place that everyone can come and discuss these cases....You, Klaas and the rest of the Monkey Mods are the Greatest!  ::MonkeyCool:: Happy New Year to You and Mrs Red!

May 2009 Bring Natalee Home to Rest in Peace!


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #788 12/31/08 -
Post by: Edward on January 01, 2009, 11:58:44 AM
I would rather chase Marcos and the reporter for the truth as they are real people we may be able to find.. Tim and Dave could help Find them..
Then we might get someplace.


I thought Marcos was a no-show in Nicaragua.

Was he just a ruse to get Tim off the Persistence and occupied elsewhere?

nope ..he met with tim and an embassy person and is visual on news video, although he would not allow his face to be seen, we can see his back of head and his is very real.
so, who put him up to this ? that would start the road leading to the rest of the cover up group.
jmho


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #788 12/31/08 -
Post by: texasmom on January 01, 2009, 11:59:46 AM
The focus now needs to be on getting the arubans to acknowledge that contents of the cage were   recovered by aruban divers on Jan 7, 2008, and provide info to whatever was recovered from the cage. Tim Miller (my Hero) and Kyle can give first hand testimony of what they witnessed to the FBI....that needs to be pursued , along with an investigation of all persistence crew members that were on board during the search.  The FBI should lead that investigation to collect testimony in the disappearance/murder of Natalee....obstruction of justice charges should be filed against any crew member that may have withheld evidence of a crime...

Yes, I agree billb!  

I'm so thankful for Kermit and her courage to do what was RIGHT for Natalee!  And I'm also thankful for the others who have joined us, I look forward to us all working together towards Justice for Natalee and her family!!!!


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #788 12/31/08 -
Post by: Keepthefaith on January 01, 2009, 12:00:26 PM
Keepthefaith...From memory on November 18th.

Van der Straten's Niece? made a post in the SM Forum, Greta either had a show or made an annoucement about her show, Red received an email from Steve Cohen and there are more, but I am sorry I do not recall now since I have finished catching up. If I get my computer back tomorrow and my timeline is still there, I will check on the others. If not I will have to search my emails and find what I have on that date.

Several Monkeys tried to answer your questions the first week you came back to the Forum. I was one and I have continued to try and answer your questions. You keep posting the same questions as if they are not being answered.

Either you are missing my posts or ignoring them. Guess that would be your choice, but I find it very frustrating when I have tried to explain my posts and answer your questions.

I don't believe I mentioned the word motivation, I think you did. I have never been one for all the coincidences and am extremely suspicious regarding this case. This is what led me to work on an extended timeline. Because you aren't acknowledging that your posts are being answered is why I posted what I did.

If you just missed them, then I apologize.

Thanx Mum!So from what i understand i should stop asking my repetitive questions?Sometimes i would like things clarified or to be refreshed in my memory.Asking questions is the foundation of Scared monkey's!Correct me if i'm wrong.I'm still not understanding why you said i'm stirring the pot.What type of statement is that?I've always had much respect for your post 's and was just disappointed to say the least.

KEEPTHEFAITH


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #788 12/31/08 -
Post by: Tamikosmom on January 01, 2009, 12:02:28 PM
Quote
. . John Silvetti moved the contents of the trap to the pond and was working with the ALE to hide evidence that was in that trap.

Now what in the world could be the reason for Silvetti to do that?!
Who is buying that crap ::MonkeyNoNo::

bastibro

Who is the source of the words "John Silvetti moved the contents of the trap to the pond and was working with the ALE to hide evidence that was in that trap."

Link please.

Thank you.

Janet

Do i really have to answer that . . isn`t it obvious who said that, not in that exact words but it comes down to the same, Janet.



<snipped>

2.  Lou ... please provide me with a link to where "Kermit states the suspicions are that John Silvetti removed evidence from the trap and placed it in the pond".

Janet

Janet - I believe it's in this post of Kermits.

http://scaredmonkeys.net/index.php?topic=4269.msg604296#msg604296

Quote
Remember Hotshot (Kathy Drenga) just recently told the monkeys that it was HER who directed Caps (and the witness) to Silvetti.
 
Could this REALLY be the first sign to prove the suspicions that Silvetti gave something from that trap to be put in the pond?  Shoe?  Skull? - speculation.



Thank you Klaas.

Kermit made it very clear that he/she was speculating ... like every Monkey on this forum has done since the getgo ... especially those who adhered to the elusive writings of Shango, Simian and CAPS.

Janet



Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #788 12/31/08 -
Post by: Keepthefaith on January 01, 2009, 12:02:46 PM
I'm not sure who was on or off last night but CapsLockwizard did do some lurking for awhile last night!did anyone else notice?


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #788 12/31/08 -
Post by: texasmom on January 01, 2009, 12:04:26 PM
Thank you Janet, and good morning!   ::MonkeyCool::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #788 12/31/08 -
Post by: texasmom on January 01, 2009, 12:05:11 PM
I'm not sure who was on or off last night but CapsLockwizard did do some lurking for awhile last night!did anyone else notice?

I noticed, lurked but didn't post.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #788 12/31/08 -
Post by: Edward on January 01, 2009, 12:07:54 PM
(http://www.foxnews.com/photoessay/photoessay_6161_images/0101090837_M_010109_bangkok01.jpg)

Jan. 1: Fire and Rescue officials collect victims following a night club fire in Bangkok, Thailand. At least 61 people, including a number of foreigners, died when a fire swept through a high-class nightclub jammed with as many as 1,000 New Year's revelers in the Thai capital.

http://www.foxnews.com/photoessay/0,4644,6161,00.html

so where is joran in this group photo..


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #788 12/31/08 -
Post by: 2NJSons_Mom on January 01, 2009, 12:09:20 PM
I'm not sure who was on or off last night but CapsLockwizard did do some lurking for awhile last night!did anyone else notice?

Yes, I noticed.  It was before I signed off. 


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #788 12/31/08 -
Post by: texasmom on January 01, 2009, 12:09:54 PM
I had a good nights sleep after catching up.  I still want to know if what jen said about Jug knowing the ship was going on an oil expedition is true.  If so then who really set up who in tis expedition?  Someone contacted Dave (John Silvetti I think) then who setup that person to get in touch with Dave? 

Natalee's Freebirds have been around for a long time.  A very, very long time ago I remember reading on this board that someone suggested putting together people from all blogs to focus/investigate this case only.  Is this how NF came into existence?    I admire all the Freebird's who came to Kermit's defense.  Great job to all involved.  Doing the right thing is all Natalee and her family deserve.  I am having a hard time understanding WHY some people believe confidentiality is more important than doing the right thing when it comes to Natalee. 

Great questions Blue Moon, I'm also very curious about how it all came about; and if there is any truth to what has been said about Jug's knowledge at another forum IIRC.  


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #788 12/31/08 -
Post by: hotping on January 01, 2009, 12:11:03 PM
I noticed that Caps was on but did not post! 


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #788 12/31/08 -
Post by: hotping on January 01, 2009, 12:14:42 PM
(http://www.foxnews.com/photoessay/photoessay_6161_images/0101090837_M_010109_bangkok01.jpg)

Jan. 1: Fire and Rescue officials collect victims following a night club fire in Bangkok, Thailand. At least 61 people, including a number of foreigners, died when a fire swept through a high-class nightclub jammed with as many as 1,000 New Year's revelers in the Thai capital.

http://www.foxnews.com/photoessay/0,4644,6161,00.html

so where is joran in this group photo..
Edward I don't know if Joran was there are not but My guess is Not since He seems to be on the run.....and is suppose to be in Laos....Who really knows though He could be anywhere with all the backing that He seems to have.....   ::MonkeyEek::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #788 12/31/08 -
Post by: Edward on January 01, 2009, 12:18:33 PM
I am being facetious.. But I would not put it past this group to try to put him there..
If they did, Plastic surgery works wonders, but his mouth will do him in anyway.  ::MonkeyWink::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #788 12/31/08 -
Post by: texasmom on January 01, 2009, 12:20:10 PM
http://www.amigoe.com/cgi-bin/artikel/exec/search.cgi?cat=3&start=6&perpage=5&template=index/headindex.html

This says a LOT about Amigoe to me, why would this story only be available to subscribers?

 ::MonkeyNoNo::

Verkrachter actief in Piedra Plat
Abonnee Artikel

31 Dec, 2008, 09:34 (GMT -04:00)

Google translation:

Rapist active in Piedra Plat
Article Subscribed

31 Dec, 2008, 09:34 (GMT -04:00)


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #788 12/31/08 -
Post by: hotping on January 01, 2009, 12:22:45 PM
I am being facetious.. But I would not put it past this group to try to put him there..
If they did, Plastic surgery works wonders, but his mouth will do him in anyway.  ::MonkeyWink::
I thought the same thing.....They would have to do a complete makeover and wire His mouth shut...to do Him any good and to keep Him from talking... ::MonkeyShocked::  ::MonkeyHaHa::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #788 12/31/08 -
Post by: SS on January 01, 2009, 12:23:33 PM
Oh, another question Kermit -  most of us have picked up through the forum threads and disussions that a sneaker and human remains were found in the pond last March.  This information might have been specific in some circles, but I think the majority of us have only heard the term "human remains".  Was anything actually found in Monserat Pond last March?  What kind of "human remains" were found?  Who has these "human remains" and the sneaker now?  If Kermit can't answer this, can anyone answer?


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #788 12/31/08 -
Post by: Tamikosmom on January 01, 2009, 12:23:55 PM

Ummm, are these posts written by the same person?  The second post contains parts that are more literate than the first post.  Almost like the second post is written by someone who has a good grasp of the English language, but is purposely trying to disguise that.


And THAT my friends is why I have had my own issues w/ Caps from the beginning. The mannerisms/typing/speech/etc. are never the same. I won't get into a huge spew over it, but I noticed it early on, mentioned it a couple of times...it bothers me .


wingnut and Nut ... I agree.

It is not just Caps lack of knowledge of the Natalee Holloway case and the main players in his initial posts ... it was also his attempt to portray that he did not have a grasp of the English language.

I hate deception and ... in my mind ... Caps was deception personified from the getgo.

The time that some Monkeys spent attempting to interpret Caps cryptic words and ... the time following his flawed research ... told me that he had placed himself or ... was placed by higher ups to distract from the contents of that cage.

Check out one of CAPS original posts to the SM Forum and ... his last.

Janet

______

CAPS - JANUARY, 2008

CapsLockWizard
Re: Natalee Case Discussion #715 1/25 -
« Reply #384 on: January 27, 2008, 02:51:39 PM »


need to know 2 things

Did Natalee travel somewhere before he come to Aruba

and

and the parents tree   Natalee is the doughter of  -----  and --------- etc.

I know that probably Dave Holloway has notting to do with this Case but the Twitty

Wat is twitty to natalee?

http://scaredmonkeys.net/index.php?topic=2539.msg332978;topicseen#msg332978


CAPS - DECEMBER 13, 2008

CapsLockWizard
Re: Natalee Case Discussion #784 12/8/08 -
« Reply #925 on: December 13, 2008, 06:18:09 AM »


To seek Justice it has to come from the UN. No other place. it has to be done with the vigil eyes of either to Interpol or the FBI. This has to be resolved first.

Te reaon for this is that The Justice Ldy is standing one leg in the US Law system and one leg in the Dutch Law System.
But the Dutch Law and the US Law doe not meet eye to eye in terms of what is allowable or permissible in court.

E.g. Drinking in the US is 21, Drinking in Aruba is 18.
Driving us is 16 yr (student license), in Aruba is 18.

in the criminal law there are differance to be resolved. What is not possible in the US is possible in the Dutch Law.

To arbitraite between these two courts has to come form both side. If Aruba let the dutch Investige a Dutch Polis, how can they be fair...Now Aruba ALE can investige but in Aruba Court the Judge is a Dutch and the Prosecuters are Dutch...How fair can that be...

If we look at Bonaire case. The Dutch girls was a victim of a crime and the Dutch came down in storms to defend the Girls and seek Justice and where happy to acuse the Locals.

In the Case of Natalee , the process is reverse, this time we have a Dutch Perp...and a US girl Mising, What they did is to rotect this time the Dutch Perp at all Cost, by twisting the law to accomodate their own system to secure a safe haven for the boy.

Now haw fair is that, If I use the Term " Cacho no ta come Cacho" meaning Dogs do not eat Dogs.

The only way that it will work is that Natalee case go to the UN and there request a resolution to the facts and by this request an independant Body of Justice to do the Investigation...

I did wrote this in February 2008 already. The is a provision in the International in the UN for that type of checkmate between to law despute.

Even if Aruba do his own investigations, it can not be parcial since the OM are all Dutch and the police chiefs are all Dutch.

the checkmate lock has to be broken by an independed UN appointed court.

No other way,

Rudy Croes can request that, but that also means goodby to his whish to have the New BES island cout in Aruba. eventough it is a lost case already. The dutch has spoken allready.

CAPS

http://scaredmonkeys.net/index.php?topic=4227.msg580535#msg580535
.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #788 12/31/08 -
Post by: texasmom on January 01, 2009, 12:25:16 PM
I'm not sure who was on or off last night but CapsLockwizard did do some lurking for awhile last night!did anyone else notice?

Actually he had been lurking quite a bit yesterday, or was being informed (incorrectly) of some of the discussion.  Right after I pushed send on my first email request to him yesterday; I immediately received an email from him describing my planning to post his work here...as if I'd agreed to without his approval.  Was actually quite revealing.

 ::MonkeyNoNo::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #788 12/31/08 -
Post by: Red on January 01, 2009, 12:28:28 PM
Here are just some thoughts regarding the Natalee Holloway case for 2009.

I have to believe that the closest comparison I can come to when evaluating what has transpired with this investigation is the OJ Simpson murder trial of Nicole Brown Simpson and Ron Goldman.

In the murder case, OJ was ignorantly would not guilty due to a bizarre and inept at times prosecution, a foolish judge and jury nullification. That compares to the Natalee Holloway case in corrupt and inept investigators and I will add what is perceived to be a prosecutor in Hans Mos that is unwilling to pull the trigger, investigate new evidence or prosecute suspects that all know thru circumstantial evidence is guilty. Actual confessions do not even seem to matter or following up on leads that suspects like JVDS have put forward to see if they are actually true. For that reason I must suspect that the prosecutors office gets their walking orders of corruption from other places as well.

That being said, do not forget that OJ Simpson was found guilty in a civil trial. OJ's legacy never was able to leave him and ultimately he committed yet another crime and will be put away for what will probably be the majority of the rest of his life.

I believe that if Beth and Dave put forth a civil case against Joran, the same thing will occur. There is less burden of truth and all will know that JVDS was guilty of the crime. Its not about the $'s, its about placing the tag of guilty on JVDS. The sporter has done nothing since Natalee Holloway's disappearance but to show he is a suck, twisted, sociopath who many believe is capable of murder.

Normally, a civil trial does not begin until the criminal case is over. However, in this case the civil trial will provide the material, depos, discovery and evidence for the criminal trial. IMO, this is the only reason why Hans Mos does not close the case. Its not because he is actually doing anything, its to block the perception that the family will not go forward with a civil suit with the criminal case still open.

One way or another Aruba's nose will be bloodied from what comes out of a civil trial. From what I understand if the civil case filed in Holland is similar to US, JVDS would have to take the stand and cannot plead the 5th.  Would not that be special seeing and hearing JVDS cross-examined.

Please know that there is work behind the scenes that is done in this case that the media is not privy to and really cannot be discussed until it is fully vetted. Who would want to give those a heads up that would provide a further cover up, intimidate witnesses or destroy evidence?

2009 may have some unique twists and turn. One thing is for certain from what occurred in 2008, the world looks at JVDS in a much different manner. Many of his strong supporters lost the stomach to do so when he confessed not once but twice in 2008. These are hardly the actions of an innocent person that would put this forth instead of going on with their life in anonymity.

JVDS will be remembered as OJ Simpson ... the sociopath who never was convicted in a criminal trial due to corruption but was found guilty in a civil trial and was forever known by the court of thinking people's public opinion as guilty of the death of Natalee Holloway.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #788 12/31/08 -
Post by: bleachedblack on January 01, 2009, 12:28:31 PM
I'm not sure who was on or off last night but CapsLockwizard did do some lurking for awhile last night!did anyone else notice?

......I noticed. No Aruba IP.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #788 12/31/08 -
Post by: Keepthefaith on January 01, 2009, 12:29:10 PM
I'm not sure who was on or off last night but CapsLockwizard did do some lurking for awhile last night!did anyone else notice?

Actually he had been lurking quite a bit yesterday, or was being informed (incorrectly) of some of the discussion.  Right after I pushed send on my first email request to him yesterday; I immediately received an email from him describing my planning to post his work here...as if I'd agreed to without his approval.  Was actually quite revealing.

 ::MonkeyNoNo::

Thanx TM.That is interesting!


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #788 12/31/08 -
Post by: blah on January 01, 2009, 12:30:36 PM
Did Kermit ever reveal whatever it was she was going to reveal last night?


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #788 12/31/08 -
Post by: bleachedblack on January 01, 2009, 12:31:05 PM
Something is definitely not right in the Sloot gene pool.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mcE2X3qfei8&feature=channel_page


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #788 12/31/08 -
Post by: Keepthefaith on January 01, 2009, 12:32:17 PM
I'm not sure who was on or off last night but CapsLockwizard did do some lurking for awhile last night!did anyone else notice?

......I noticed. No Aruba IP.

No Aruba IP?Can we confirm that with any of the Mods??TIA


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #788 12/31/08 -
Post by: MuffyBee on January 01, 2009, 12:32:27 PM
I'm not sure who was on or off last night but CapsLockwizard did do some lurking for awhile last night!did anyone else notice?

Yes, I saw that.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #788 12/31/08 -
Post by: jen3560 on January 01, 2009, 12:34:06 PM




You mean we were asked to subsidize this with our little donations we scraped together in effort to have all the sites checked?  I am glad I only sent to TES but nevertheless, we were asked.

Is it ethical to use a missing person for financial opportunities?

However, this may not even be true at all.  Must always consider the sources.



That is an excellent question.  But you are correct - we must consider the source(s) this is coming from.

Here's another question, that ties into the one you asked.

How ethical is it to ask for donations AFTER you know you are already coming home?

To state you need around 1 million dollars more to finish the search? (check Silvetti's posts at BFN after he was home)

When all along, Mos is saying the search crew is leaving, and is NOT planning to come back?

Asking for this one million dollars, stating they need to find a smaller boat to make the costs more feasible - when all along, Silvetti OWNS (at least) one smaller boat.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #788 12/31/08 -
Post by: texasmom on January 01, 2009, 12:34:54 PM
I'm not sure who was on or off last night but CapsLockwizard did do some lurking for awhile last night!did anyone else notice?

......I noticed. No Aruba IP.

I think Hotshot confirmed yesterday that he has the program to disguise where he's posting from.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #788 12/31/08 -
Post by: klaasend on January 01, 2009, 12:35:02 PM
http://www.amigoe.com/cgi-bin/artikel/exec/search.cgi?cat=3&start=6&perpage=5&template=index/headindex.html

This says a LOT about Amigoe to me, why would this story only be available to subscribers?

 ::MonkeyNoNo::

Verkrachter actief in Piedra Plat
Abonnee Artikel

31 Dec, 2008, 09:34 (GMT -04:00)

Google translation:

Rapist active in Piedra Plat
Article Subscribed

31 Dec, 2008, 09:34 (GMT -04:00)


http://www.amigoe.com/artman/publish/printer_51050.php

Aruba
Rapist active in Piedra Plat
31 Dec, 2008, 09:34 (GMT -04:00)




ORANGE CITY - A 57-year-old woman last week in Piedra Plat the victim of an attempted assault. The woman was sleeping peacefully when she suddenly wakes up frightened by unfamiliar sounds. She got up to go look in her house and found an unknown man. The woman tried to flee through the front door, but the man took her and forced her to the ground. Then the man tried to its edges, but because the victim continued to resist and fight, the man eventually fled. Police advise residents of Piedra Plat to handle the next time to be extra vigilant and take precautionary measures. Measures such as an alarm, a watchdog and "something to keep you defend" are not a luxury, according to the police.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #788 12/31/08 -
Post by: klaasend on January 01, 2009, 12:36:54 PM
I'm not sure who was on or off last night but CapsLockwizard did do some lurking for awhile last night!did anyone else notice?

......I noticed. No Aruba IP.

I think Hotshot confirmed yesterday that he has the program to disguise where he's posting from.

I checked and DID see someone from Aruba.  I don't know for sure Caps motives but I don't doubt he is in Aruba.  Everything I see points that way.  Now, there could be more than one person usuing his nickname and logon, but as far as I can tell they have all been from Aruba.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #788 12/31/08 -
Post by: klaasend on January 01, 2009, 12:37:58 PM
I'm not sure who was on or off last night but CapsLockwizard did do some lurking for awhile last night!did anyone else notice?

......I noticed. No Aruba IP.

No Aruba IP?Can we confirm that with any of the Mods??TIA

Sorry, I should have taken a screen capture but according to the world map on the site meter there WAS someone from Aruba logged on when Capslock was lurking.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #788 12/31/08 -
Post by: hotping on January 01, 2009, 12:41:22 PM
Here are just some thoughts regarding the Natalee Holloway case for 2009.

I have to believe that the closest comparison I can come to when evaluating what has transpired with this investigation is the OJ Simpson murder trial of Nicole Brown Simpson and Ron Goldman.

In the murder case, OJ was ignorantly would not guilty due to a bizarre and inept at times prosecution, a foolish judge and jury nullification. That compares to the Natalee Holloway case in corrupt and inept investigators and I will add what is perceived to be a prosecutor in Hans Mos that is unwilling to pull the trigger, investigate new evidence or prosecute suspects that all know thru circumstantial evidence is guilty. Actual confessions do not even seem to matter or following up on leads that suspects like JVDS have put forward to see if they are actually true. For that reason I must suspect that the prosecutors office gets their walking orders of corruption from other places as well.

That being said, do not forget that OJ Simpson was found guilty in a civil trial. OJ's legacy never was able to leave him and ultimately he committed yet another crime and will be put away for what will probably be the majority of the rest of his life.

I believe that if Beth and Dave put forth a civil case against Joran, the same thing will occur. There is less burden of truth and all will know that JVDS was guilty of the crime. Its not about the $'s, its about placing the tag of guilty on JVDS. The sporter has done nothing since Natalee Holloway's disappearance but to show he is a suck, twisted, sociopath who many believe is capable of murder.

Normally, a civil trial does not begin until the criminal case is over. However, in this case the civil trial will provide the material, depos, discovery and evidence for the criminal trial. IMO, this is the only reason why Hans Mos does not close the case. Its not because he is actually doing anything, its to block the perception that the family will not go forward with a civil suit with the criminal case still open.

One way or another Aruba's nose will be bloodied from what comes out of a civil trial. From what I understand if the civil case filed in Holland is similar to US, JVDS would have to take the stand and cannot plead the 5th.  Would not that be special seeing and hearing JVDS cross-examined.

Please know that there is work behind the scenes that is done in this case that the media is not privy to and really cannot be discussed until it is fully vetted. Who would want to give those a heads up that would provide a further cover up, intimidate witnesses or destroy evidence?

2009 may have some unique twists and turn. One thing is for certain from what occurred in 2008, the world looks at JVDS in a much different manner. Many of his strong supporters lost the stomach to do so when he confessed not once but twice in 2008. These are hardly the actions of an innocent person that would put this forth instead of going on with their life in anonymity.

JVDS will be remembered as OJ Simpson ... the sociopath who never was convicted in a criminal trial due to corruption but was found guilty in a civil trial and was forever known by the court of thinking people's public opinion as guilty of the death of Natalee Holloway.
Thank You... Your posts always give Me Hope that Natalee will get to Rest in Peace and that Her Family will get answers... ::MonkeyCool:: 


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #788 12/31/08 -
Post by: hotping on January 01, 2009, 12:47:03 PM




You mean we were asked to subsidize this with our little donations we scraped together in effort to have all the sites checked?  I am glad I only sent to TES but nevertheless, we were asked.

Is it ethical to use a missing person for financial opportunities?

However, this may not even be true at all.  Must always consider the sources.



That is an excellent question.  But you are correct - we must consider the source(s) this is coming from.

Here's another question, that ties into the one you asked.

How ethical is it to ask for donations AFTER you know you are already coming home?

To state you need around 1 million dollars more to finish the search? (check Silvetti's posts at BFN after he was home)

When all along, Mos is saying the search crew is leaving, and is NOT planning to come back?

Asking for this one million dollars, stating they need to find a smaller boat to make the costs more feasible - when all along, Silvetti OWNS (at least) one smaller boat.
Yes...Lots of Us did make donations for this return trip to check more targets....I just hope that the money went to TES and not to Silvetti.. ::MonkeyEek:: I think that We were all  seriously screwed... JMO


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #788 12/31/08 -
Post by: Edward on January 01, 2009, 12:47:16 PM
Here are just some thoughts regarding the Natalee Holloway case for 2009.

I have to believe that the closest comparison I can come to when evaluating what has transpired with this investigation is the OJ Simpson murder trial of Nicole Brown Simpson and Ron Goldman.

In the murder case, OJ was ignorantly would not guilty due to a bizarre and inept at times prosecution, a foolish judge and jury nullification. That compares to the Natalee Holloway case in corrupt and inept investigators and I will add what is perceived to be a prosecutor in Hans Mos that is unwilling to pull the trigger, investigate new evidence or prosecute suspects that all know thru circumstantial evidence is guilty. Actual confessions do not even seem to matter or following up on leads that suspects like JVDS have put forward to see if they are actually true. For that reason I must suspect that the prosecutors office gets their walking orders of corruption from other places as well.

That being said, do not forget that OJ Simpson was found guilty in a civil trial. OJ's legacy never was able to leave him and ultimately he committed yet another crime and will be put away for what will probably be the majority of the rest of his life.

I believe that if Beth and Dave put forth a civil case against Joran, the same thing will occur. There is less burden of truth and all will know that JVDS was guilty of the crime. Its not about the $'s, its about placing the tag of guilty on JVDS. The sporter has done nothing since Natalee Holloway's disappearance but to show he is a suck, twisted, sociopath who many believe is capable of murder.

Normally, a civil trial does not begin until the criminal case is over. However, in this case the civil trial will provide the material, depos, discovery and evidence for the criminal trial. IMO, this is the only reason why Hans Mos does not close the case. Its not because he is actually doing anything, its to block the perception that the family will not go forward with a civil suit with the criminal case still open.

One way or another Aruba's nose will be bloodied from what comes out of a civil trial. From what I understand if the civil case filed in Holland is similar to US, JVDS would have to take the stand and cannot plead the 5th.  Would not that be special seeing and hearing JVDS cross-examined.

Please know that there is work behind the scenes that is done in this case that the media is not privy to and really cannot be discussed until it is fully vetted. Who would want to give those a heads up that would provide a further cover up, intimidate witnesses or destroy evidence?

2009 may have some unique twists and turn. One thing is for certain from what occurred in 2008, the world looks at JVDS in a much different manner. Many of his strong supporters lost the stomach to do so when he confessed not once but twice in 2008. These are hardly the actions of an innocent person that would put this forth instead of going on with their life in anonymity.

JVDS will be remembered as OJ Simpson ... the sociopath who never was convicted in a criminal trial due to corruption but was found guilty in a civil trial and was forever known by the court of thinking people's public opinion as guilty of the death of Natalee Holloway.

Theory...

So The idea was to get the united states attorney general to take a case in front of the world court in the Hague..
Natalee would be the case..
If it was brought before the world court it would establish an agreement to abide by its rulings in the future.
This would bypass the un-signing of an agreement to do so by Condi Rice and allow the World Court to go after Bush and Cheney..
Sound Crazy ?
Look at Bettencourt's little lie and game play.. 6 years tied to a tree in the Andies..
Believe me Paulus and politics could very well be right in the middle of a similar game and for all we know Natalee is alive and held captive by the FARC. Also she may have been murdered and disposed of as a Pawn in a bigger game.
Also This is why we see Joran running around FREE in the world.. He is like a fishing Lure..  ;)

The games people play.
This is one big game play but would explain a lot of moves we have watched by the Dutch.
In history they have played many games.

All of this is a guess on my part.. I admit I have no proof of a live Natalee.
Everything besides that I have proof of and have posted it.
JMHO




Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #788 12/31/08 -
Post by: Blue Moon on January 01, 2009, 12:47:30 PM
Something is definitely not right in the Sloot gene pool.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mcE2X3qfei8&feature=channel_page

I take it that is Sebastian, the youngest?


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #788 12/31/08 -
Post by: Edward on January 01, 2009, 12:48:27 PM
my above quote is from..
http://blogsfornatalee.com/forum/index.php?topic=7483.675


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #788 12/31/08 -
Post by: hotping on January 01, 2009, 12:48:41 PM
I'm not sure who was on or off last night but CapsLockwizard did do some lurking for awhile last night!did anyone else notice?

......I noticed. No Aruba IP.

No Aruba IP?Can we confirm that with any of the Mods??TIA

Sorry, I should have taken a screen capture but according to the world map on the site meter there WAS someone from Aruba logged on when Capslock was lurking.
No need for a screenshot..Klaas.. Your word is Good as Gold!  ::MonkeyWink::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #788 12/31/08 -
Post by: 2NJSons_Mom on January 01, 2009, 12:50:01 PM
Something is definitely not right in the Sloot gene pool.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mcE2X3qfei8&feature=channel_page

Strange collection of videos & screenname    ::MonkeyRoll::  ....wonder if his parents know what he's doing when bored (oh, yeah, he's an artist). 


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #788 12/31/08 -
Post by: texasmom on January 01, 2009, 12:52:36 PM
Something is definitely not right in the Sloot gene pool.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mcE2X3qfei8&feature=channel_page

I agree!

More videos with the Zeolla friend here:

http://www.youtube.com/user/lickmytongue124

 ::MonkeyNoNo::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #788 12/31/08 -
Post by: Blue Moon on January 01, 2009, 12:52:57 PM




You mean we were asked to subsidize this with our little donations we scraped together in effort to have all the sites checked?  I am glad I only sent to TES but nevertheless, we were asked.

Is it ethical to use a missing person for financial opportunities?

However, this may not even be true at all.  Must always consider the sources.



That is an excellent question.  But you are correct - we must consider the source(s) this is coming from.

Here's another question, that ties into the one you asked.

How ethical is it to ask for donations AFTER you know you are already coming home?

To state you need around 1 million dollars more to finish the search? (check Silvetti's posts at BFN after he was home)

When all along, Mos is saying the search crew is leaving, and is NOT planning to come back?

Asking for this one million dollars, stating they need to find a smaller boat to make the costs more feasible - when all along, Silvetti OWNS (at least) one smaller boat.

Somewhere on here it was posted IF we donated (I did) we should receive our money back.  I have not seen anything saying my money was refunded.  I did it through TES so I am hoping it was used for whatever needs TES had for any missing person.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #788 12/31/08 -
Post by: texasmom on January 01, 2009, 12:54:34 PM
Something is definitely not right in the Sloot gene pool.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mcE2X3qfei8&feature=channel_page

I take it that is Sebastian, the youngest?

Yes, and Rand is a Zeolla.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #788 12/31/08 -
Post by: texasmom on January 01, 2009, 12:55:45 PM
http://www.amigoe.com/cgi-bin/artikel/exec/search.cgi?cat=3&start=6&perpage=5&template=index/headindex.html

This says a LOT about Amigoe to me, why would this story only be available to subscribers?

 ::MonkeyNoNo::

Verkrachter actief in Piedra Plat
Abonnee Artikel

31 Dec, 2008, 09:34 (GMT -04:00)

Google translation:

Rapist active in Piedra Plat
Article Subscribed

31 Dec, 2008, 09:34 (GMT -04:00)


http://www.amigoe.com/artman/publish/printer_51050.php

Aruba
Rapist active in Piedra Plat
31 Dec, 2008, 09:34 (GMT -04:00)




ORANGE CITY - A 57-year-old woman last week in Piedra Plat the victim of an attempted assault. The woman was sleeping peacefully when she suddenly wakes up frightened by unfamiliar sounds. She got up to go look in her house and found an unknown man. The woman tried to flee through the front door, but the man took her and forced her to the ground. Then the man tried to its edges, but because the victim continued to resist and fight, the man eventually fled. Police advise residents of Piedra Plat to handle the next time to be extra vigilant and take precautionary measures. Measures such as an alarm, a watchdog and "something to keep you defend" are not a luxury, according to the police.

Thanks Klaas!


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #788 12/31/08 -
Post by: bleachedblack on January 01, 2009, 12:58:58 PM
I'm not sure who was on or off last night but CapsLockwizard did do some lurking for awhile last night!did anyone else notice?

......I noticed. No Aruba IP.

I think Hotshot confirmed yesterday that he has the program to disguise where he's posting from.

I checked and DID see someone from Aruba.  I don't know for sure Caps motives but I don't doubt he is in Aruba.  Everything I see points that way.  Now, there could be more than one person usuing his nickname and logon, but as far as I can tell they have all been from Aruba.

I checked the sitemeter link below 4x when he was on, and did not see aruba. I do believe that he does post from Aruba.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #788 12/31/08 -
Post by: jen3560 on January 01, 2009, 12:59:37 PM
ldstlou wrote:
Tim Miller wasn't removed from anywhere...are you kidding me? You really think he would allow himself to be removed? He was following up a lead in Nicaragua.
------------------


I'm sorry to say - yes he was.  Along with Dateline.

Dec 30th, Kyle and Tim Miller discussed this issue in detail, but they didn't know how to handle it.  Then Kyle took a nap.  When he got up, Tim and Dateline had been ejected from the boat.

ldstlou, I don't know what fairy tales Kyle and others are now telling you, but Kyle's posts (with IP, date and time) are in their original form from when he posted them.  This item was discussed over several posts.

The Nicarauga thing didn't happen for a few more days after that, IIRC.



Exactly, Jen.  IIRC, Kyle stated that Dec 30th was "crushing" - that Tim Miller and Dateline were REMOVED from the boat.



At who's request would they have been removed from the ship?  By Mos or John Silvetti?  They is all unreal that this could have happened.  Kyle specifically asked us what we thought they should do IF they found Natalee's remains and it was a resounding "Take her remains and leave and bring her home to her family". 

This may have already been answered, just trying to catch up here.

Tim Miller was removed by John Silvetti himself on December 30th.

And it was actually private eye who posed the question about if remains were found - on December 30th


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #788 12/31/08 -
Post by: klaasend on January 01, 2009, 01:02:28 PM
Something is definitely not right in the Sloot gene pool.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mcE2X3qfei8&feature=channel_page

I take it that is Sebastian, the youngest?

Yep, that's him


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #788 12/31/08 -
Post by: Keepthefaith on January 01, 2009, 01:03:19 PM
ldstlou wrote:
Tim Miller wasn't removed from anywhere...are you kidding me? You really think he would allow himself to be removed? He was following up a lead in Nicaragua.
------------------


I'm sorry to say - yes he was.  Along with Dateline.

Dec 30th, Kyle and Tim Miller discussed this issue in detail, but they didn't know how to handle it.  Then Kyle took a nap.  When he got up, Tim and Dateline had been ejected from the boat.

ldstlou, I don't know what fairy tales Kyle and others are now telling you, but Kyle's posts (with IP, date and time) are in their original form from when he posted them.  This item was discussed over several posts.

The Nicarauga thing didn't happen for a few more days after that, IIRC.



Exactly, Jen.  IIRC, Kyle stated that Dec 30th was "crushing" - that Tim Miller and Dateline were REMOVED from the boat.



At who's request would they have been removed from the ship?  By Mos or John Silvetti?  They is all unreal that this could have happened.  Kyle specifically asked us what we thought they should do IF they found Natalee's remains and it was a resounding "Take her remains and leave and bring her home to her family". 

This may have already been answered, just trying to catch up here.

Tim Miller was removed by John Silvetti himself on December 30th.

And it was actually private eye who posed the question about if remains were found - on December 30th

I say we have Dana have Silvetti,Tim,Kyle,as well as Red to have a little discussion concerning what transpired out there in them waters!


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #788 12/31/08 -
Post by: jen3560 on January 01, 2009, 01:05:20 PM
The focus now needs to be on getting the arubans to acknowledge that contents of the cage were   recovered by aruban divers on Jan 7, 2008, and provide info to whatever was recovered from the cage. Tim Miller (my Hero) and Kyle can give first hand testimony of what they witnessed to the FBI....that needs to be pursued , along with an investigation of all persistence crew members that were on board during the search.  The FBI should lead that investigation to collect testimony in the disappearance/murder of Natalee....obstruction of justice charges should be filed against any crew member that may have withheld evidence of a crime...

EXACTLY!!

This is precisely the reason Natalee's Freebirds agreed to help Kyle when he approached us to present all of this information.

And this is the point that needs to be addressed.

Thank you billb!!!


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #788 12/31/08 -
Post by: Blue Moon on January 01, 2009, 01:07:31 PM
ldstlou wrote:
Tim Miller wasn't removed from anywhere...are you kidding me? You really think he would allow himself to be removed? He was following up a lead in Nicaragua.
------------------


I'm sorry to say - yes he was.  Along with Dateline.

Dec 30th, Kyle and Tim Miller discussed this issue in detail, but they didn't know how to handle it.  Then Kyle took a nap.  When he got up, Tim and Dateline had been ejected from the boat.

ldstlou, I don't know what fairy tales Kyle and others are now telling you, but Kyle's posts (with IP, date and time) are in their original form from when he posted them.  This item was discussed over several posts.

The Nicarauga thing didn't happen for a few more days after that, IIRC.



Exactly, Jen.  IIRC, Kyle stated that Dec 30th was "crushing" - that Tim Miller and Dateline were REMOVED from the boat.



At who's request would they have been removed from the ship?  By Mos or John Silvetti?  They is all unreal that this could have happened.  Kyle specifically asked us what we thought they should do IF they found Natalee's remains and it was a resounding "Take her remains and leave and bring her home to her family". 

This may have already been answered, just trying to catch up here.

Tim Miller was removed by John Silvetti himself on December 30th.

And it was actually private eye who posed the question about if remains were found - on December 30th

Thanks Jen.  So who was in charge on this ship, John Silvetti or Schaffer?  Who was calling the shots with the Arubans?


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #788 12/31/08 -
Post by: bleachedblack on January 01, 2009, 01:08:08 PM
I'm not sure who was on or off last night but CapsLockwizard did do some lurking for awhile last night!did anyone else notice?

......I noticed. No Aruba IP.

No Aruba IP?Can we confirm that with any of the Mods??TIA

Sorry, I should have taken a screen capture but according to the world map on the site meter there WAS someone from Aruba logged on when Capslock was lurking.

Yea, I didn't check the map, only the IP adresses.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #788 12/31/08 -
Post by: Keepthefaith on January 01, 2009, 01:11:22 PM
ldstlou wrote:
Tim Miller wasn't removed from anywhere...are you kidding me? You really think he would allow himself to be removed? He was following up a lead in Nicaragua.
------------------


I'm sorry to say - yes he was.  Along with Dateline.

Dec 30th, Kyle and Tim Miller discussed this issue in detail, but they didn't know how to handle it.  Then Kyle took a nap.  When he got up, Tim and Dateline had been ejected from the boat.

ldstlou, I don't know what fairy tales Kyle and others are now telling you, but Kyle's posts (with IP, date and time) are in their original form from when he posted them.  This item was discussed over several posts.

The Nicarauga thing didn't happen for a few more days after that, IIRC.



Exactly, Jen.  IIRC, Kyle stated that Dec 30th was "crushing" - that Tim Miller and Dateline were REMOVED from the boat.



At who's request would they have been removed from the ship?  By Mos or John Silvetti?  They is all unreal that this could have happened.  Kyle specifically asked us what we thought they should do IF they found Natalee's remains and it was a resounding "Take her remains and leave and bring her home to her family". 

This may have already been answered, just trying to catch up here.

Tim Miller was removed by John Silvetti himself on December 30th.

And it was actually private eye who posed the question about if remains were found - on December 30th

Thanks Jen.  So who was in charge on this ship, John Silvetti or Schaffer?  Who was calling the shots with the Arubans?

Silvetti was!He was talking with Mos and Richardson if i'm correct.I asked the same question.Correct me if i'm wrong Monkey's..TIA


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #788 12/31/08 -
Post by: bleachedblack on January 01, 2009, 01:12:13 PM
Something is definitely not right in the Sloot gene pool.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mcE2X3qfei8&feature=channel_page

I take it that is Sebastian, the youngest?

Yep, that's him

Looks a lot like the Sloot house too. Vegetation appears to have grown over the last few years.....then I imagine Paulus has had plenty of time to garden.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #788 12/31/08 -
Post by: bastibro on January 01, 2009, 01:13:02 PM
Something is definitely not right in the Sloot gene pool.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mcE2X3qfei8&feature=channel_page

I take it that is Sebastian, the youngest?

Yes, and Rand is a Zeolla.

Zeolla?? ::MonkeyShocked::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #788 12/31/08 -
Post by: bleachedblack on January 01, 2009, 01:13:38 PM
ldstlou wrote:
Tim Miller wasn't removed from anywhere...are you kidding me? You really think he would allow himself to be removed? He was following up a lead in Nicaragua.
------------------


I'm sorry to say - yes he was.  Along with Dateline.

Dec 30th, Kyle and Tim Miller discussed this issue in detail, but they didn't know how to handle it.  Then Kyle took a nap.  When he got up, Tim and Dateline had been ejected from the boat.

ldstlou, I don't know what fairy tales Kyle and others are now telling you, but Kyle's posts (with IP, date and time) are in their original form from when he posted them.  This item was discussed over several posts.

The Nicarauga thing didn't happen for a few more days after that, IIRC.



Exactly, Jen.  IIRC, Kyle stated that Dec 30th was "crushing" - that Tim Miller and Dateline were REMOVED from the boat.



At who's request would they have been removed from the ship?  By Mos or John Silvetti?  They is all unreal that this could have happened.  Kyle specifically asked us what we thought they should do IF they found Natalee's remains and it was a resounding "Take her remains and leave and bring her home to her family". 

This may have already been answered, just trying to catch up here.

Tim Miller was removed by John Silvetti himself on December 30th.

And it was actually private eye who posed the question about if remains were found - on December 30th

I say we have Dana have Silvetti,Tim,Kyle,as well as Red to have a little discussion concerning what transpired out there in them waters!

I would wager Silvetti and Kyle would be a no show.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #788 12/31/08 -
Post by: jen3560 on January 01, 2009, 01:14:07 PM
keepthefaith,

you are correct.  John Silvetti was the Project Lead (along with Tim Trahan and Tim Miller).

By the time jan 7 rolled around - the ONLY Project Lead left aboard was John Silvetti.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #788 12/31/08 -
Post by: texasmom on January 01, 2009, 01:14:55 PM
Something is definitely not right in the Sloot gene pool.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mcE2X3qfei8&feature=channel_page

I take it that is Sebastian, the youngest?

Yes, and Rand is a Zeolla.

Zeolla?? ::MonkeyShocked::

Yes, and I think the younger one is too.  David?


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #788 12/31/08 -
Post by: Keepthefaith on January 01, 2009, 01:17:26 PM
keepthefaith,

you are correct.  John Silvetti was the Project Lead (along with Tim Trahan and Tim Miller).

By the time jan 7 rolled around - the ONLY Project Lead left aboard was John Silvetti.

Did Kyle ever describe the protocol in terms of who Silvetti would speak with in terms of the ALE.Was it typically Mos or was it Richardson?Still curious as to Comemencia.He always seems to be around but seldom talked about.He's a little elusive!Thanx Jen.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #788 12/31/08 -
Post by: texasmom on January 01, 2009, 01:17:43 PM
keepthefaith,

you are correct.  John Silvetti was the Project Lead (along with Tim Trahan and Tim Miller).

By the time jan 7 rolled around - the ONLY Project Lead left aboard was John Silvetti.

That is interesting!   ::MonkeyCool::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #788 12/31/08 -
Post by: bleachedblack on January 01, 2009, 01:18:36 PM
Something is definitely not right in the Sloot gene pool.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mcE2X3qfei8&feature=channel_page

I take it that is Sebastian, the youngest?

Yes, and Rand is a Zeolla.

Zeolla?? ::MonkeyShocked::

Father is general manager of Marriott.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #788 12/31/08 -
Post by: Keepthefaith on January 01, 2009, 01:19:07 PM
keepthefaith,

you are correct.  John Silvetti was the Project Lead (along with Tim Trahan and Tim Miller).

By the time jan 7 rolled around - the ONLY Project Lead left aboard was John Silvetti.

That is interesting!   ::MonkeyCool::

It is very disturbing TM!


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #788 12/31/08 -
Post by: hotping on January 01, 2009, 01:19:11 PM
keepthefaith,

you are correct.  John Silvetti was the Project Lead (along with Tim Trahan and Tim Miller).

By the time jan 7 rolled around - the ONLY Project Lead left aboard was John Silvetti.

That is interesting!   ::MonkeyCool::
Very Interesting!  ::MonkeyShocked::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #788 12/31/08 -
Post by: Nut44x4 on January 01, 2009, 01:19:55 PM
Something is definitely not right in the Sloot gene pool.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mcE2X3qfei8&feature=channel_page

Oh yeah..... ::MonkeyEek::  ::MonkeyNoNo::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #788 12/31/08 -
Post by: Keepthefaith on January 01, 2009, 01:20:14 PM
Something is definitely not right in the Sloot gene pool.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mcE2X3qfei8&feature=channel_page

I take it that is Sebastian, the youngest?

Yes, and Rand is a Zeolla.

Zeolla?? ::MonkeyShocked::

Father is general manager of Marriott.

Are you serious?Keep making dumb youtube videos Sebastian.Good work.Maybe we can put a structure of the friendships on the island.... ::MonkeyDance:: ::MonkeyDance::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #788 12/31/08 -
Post by: hotping on January 01, 2009, 01:20:35 PM
ldstlou wrote:
Tim Miller wasn't removed from anywhere...are you kidding me? You really think he would allow himself to be removed? He was following up a lead in Nicaragua.
------------------


I'm sorry to say - yes he was.  Along with Dateline.

Dec 30th, Kyle and Tim Miller discussed this issue in detail, but they didn't know how to handle it.  Then Kyle took a nap.  When he got up, Tim and Dateline had been ejected from the boat.

ldstlou, I don't know what fairy tales Kyle and others are now telling you, but Kyle's posts (with IP, date and time) are in their original form from when he posted them.  This item was discussed over several posts.

The Nicarauga thing didn't happen for a few more days after that, IIRC.



Exactly, Jen.  IIRC, Kyle stated that Dec 30th was "crushing" - that Tim Miller and Dateline were REMOVED from the boat.



At who's request would they have been removed from the ship?  By Mos or John Silvetti?  They is all unreal that this could have happened.  Kyle specifically asked us what we thought they should do IF they found Natalee's remains and it was a resounding "Take her remains and leave and bring her home to her family". 

This may have already been answered, just trying to catch up here.

Tim Miller was removed by John Silvetti himself on December 30th.

And it was actually private eye who posed the question about if remains were found - on December 30th

I say we have Dana have Silvetti,Tim,Kyle,as well as Red to have a little discussion concerning what transpired out there in them waters!

I would wager Silvetti and Kyle would be a no show.
Yep!


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #788 12/31/08 -
Post by: Keepthefaith on January 01, 2009, 01:22:24 PM
ldstlou wrote:
Tim Miller wasn't removed from anywhere...are you kidding me? You really think he would allow himself to be removed? He was following up a lead in Nicaragua.
------------------


I'm sorry to say - yes he was.  Along with Dateline.

Dec 30th, Kyle and Tim Miller discussed this issue in detail, but they didn't know how to handle it.  Then Kyle took a nap.  When he got up, Tim and Dateline had been ejected from the boat.

ldstlou, I don't know what fairy tales Kyle and others are now telling you, but Kyle's posts (with IP, date and time) are in their original form from when he posted them.  This item was discussed over several posts.

The Nicarauga thing didn't happen for a few more days after that, IIRC.



Exactly, Jen.  IIRC, Kyle stated that Dec 30th was "crushing" - that Tim Miller and Dateline were REMOVED from the boat.



At who's request would they have been removed from the ship?  By Mos or John Silvetti?  They is all unreal that this could have happened.  Kyle specifically asked us what we thought they should do IF they found Natalee's remains and it was a resounding "Take her remains and leave and bring her home to her family". 

This may have already been answered, just trying to catch up here.

Tim Miller was removed by John Silvetti himself on December 30th.

And it was actually private eye who posed the question about if remains were found - on December 30th

I say we have Dana have Silvetti,Tim,Kyle,as well as Red to have a little discussion concerning what transpired out there in them waters!

I would wager Silvetti and Kyle would be a no show.
Yep!

At least we'd know who stood where.It would be telling wouldn't it??


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #788 12/31/08 -
Post by: Blue Moon on January 01, 2009, 01:22:59 PM
keepthefaith,

you are correct.  John Silvetti was the Project Lead (along with Tim Trahan and Tim Miller).

By the time jan 7 rolled around - the ONLY Project Lead left aboard was John Silvetti.

So even Tim Trahan was not on board Jan. 7th?  Where did he go?  So did anyone have footage of the Jan. 7th dive at all?  If not then Silvetti did his job well and betrayed the family completely.  Has anyone asked Jossy about his son and what he has to say about all of this?  Or is that why Jossy has become so quiet lately?  I like Jossy but (sorry) I have always had a rather funny feeling about his motives in all this.  Mostly is appears more political than anything.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #788 12/31/08 -
Post by: bastibro on January 01, 2009, 01:28:34 PM
Something is definitely not right in the Sloot gene pool.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mcE2X3qfei8&feature=channel_page

I take it that is Sebastian, the youngest?

Yes, and Rand is a Zeolla.

Zeolla?? ::MonkeyShocked::

Father is general manager of Marriott.

Thanks bleachedblack and TM !


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #788 12/31/08 -
Post by: bastibro on January 01, 2009, 01:30:43 PM
keepthefaith,

you are correct.  John Silvetti was the Project Lead (along with Tim Trahan and Tim Miller).

By the time jan 7 rolled around - the ONLY Project Lead left aboard was John Silvetti.

So even Tim Trahan was not on board Jan. 7th?  Where did he go?  So did anyone have footage of the Jan. 7th dive at all?  If not then Silvetti did his job well and betrayed the family completely.  Has anyone asked Jossy about his son and what he has to say about all of this?  Or is that why Jossy has become so quiet lately?   I like Jossy but (sorry) I have always had a rather funny feeling about his motives in all this.  Mostly is appears more political than anything.

Those were my thoughts last night  ::MonkeyHaHa::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #788 12/31/08 -
Post by: texasmom on January 01, 2009, 01:31:55 PM
keepthefaith,

you are correct.  John Silvetti was the Project Lead (along with Tim Trahan and Tim Miller).

By the time jan 7 rolled around - the ONLY Project Lead left aboard was John Silvetti.

So even Tim Trahan was not on board Jan. 7th?  Where did he go?  So did anyone have footage of the Jan. 7th dive at all?  If not then Silvetti did his job well and betrayed the family completely.  Has anyone asked Jossy about his son and what he has to say about all of this?  Or is that why Jossy has become so quiet lately?  I like Jossy but (sorry) I have always had a rather funny feeling about his motives in all this.  Mostly is appears more political than anything.

Diario's internet site has not been updated in over a week.  Maybe they shut down for the holidays?


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #788 12/31/08 -
Post by: Edward on January 01, 2009, 01:33:33 PM
“Hague Invasion Act”: Bush Signs a New Law Designed to Intimidate Countries That Ratify the Treaty for the International Criminal Court. President George Bush signed into law the American Service-Members Protection Act of 2002, which will supposedly protect U.S. Service-Members from the International Criminal Court. (Democracy Now – War and Peace Report 08/06/02)

The new law authorizes the use of military force to liberate any American or citizen of a U.S.-allied country being held by the court. This provision, dubbed the “Hague invasion clause,” has caused a strong reaction from U.S. allies around the world, particularly in the Netherlands.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #788 12/31/08 -
Post by: Edward on January 01, 2009, 01:35:12 PM
It is ALL by design.  ::MonkeyEek::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #788 12/31/08 -
Post by: Blue Moon on January 01, 2009, 01:36:57 PM
keepthefaith,

you are correct.  John Silvetti was the Project Lead (along with Tim Trahan and Tim Miller).

By the time jan 7 rolled around - the ONLY Project Lead left aboard was John Silvetti.

So even Tim Trahan was not on board Jan. 7th?  Where did he go?  So did anyone have footage of the Jan. 7th dive at all?  If not then Silvetti did his job well and betrayed the family completely.  Has anyone asked Jossy about his son and what he has to say about all of this?  Or is that why Jossy has become so quiet lately?   I like Jossy but (sorry) I have always had a rather funny feeling about his motives in all this.  Mostly is appears more political than anything.

Those were my thoughts last night  ::MonkeyHaHa::

Bastribo, I personally think Jossy has some "plaining" to do here.  He was working with Caps and putting out the info in Dairo on the witnesses and the ponds AND he was (I think I read it correctly here) a friend of John Silvetti?  Leaves me with a lot of questions for Jossy.  JMO


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #788 12/31/08 -
Post by: Blue Moon on January 01, 2009, 01:38:47 PM
Sorry I spelled Bastibro's name incorrectly.  Hope he knows who I meant. ::MonkeyCool::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #788 12/31/08 -
Post by: bleachedblack on January 01, 2009, 01:42:07 PM
keepthefaith,

you are correct.  John Silvetti was the Project Lead (along with Tim Trahan and Tim Miller).

By the time jan 7 rolled around - the ONLY Project Lead left aboard was John Silvetti.

So even Tim Trahan was not on board Jan. 7th?  Where did he go?  So did anyone have footage of the Jan. 7th dive at all?  If not then Silvetti did his job well and betrayed the family completely.  Has anyone asked Jossy about his son and what he has to say about all of this?  Or is that why Jossy has become so quiet lately?  I like Jossy but (sorry) I have always had a rather funny feeling about his motives in all this.  Mostly is appears more political than anything.

I still have my reservations about Jossy and his motives, even after all this time.

Woman y Man of The Year 2008
(http://www.diario-aruba.com/images/2008/december/19/local/jossy.jpg)

http://www.diario-aruba.com/200812195270/Local/Como-Woman-y-Man-of-The-Year-2008....Magaly-Brito-y-Freddie-Rafine-a-haya-nan-reconocimento-ayeranochi.html


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #788 12/31/08 -
Post by: Keepthefaith on January 01, 2009, 01:43:08 PM
keepthefaith,

you are correct.  John Silvetti was the Project Lead (along with Tim Trahan and Tim Miller).

By the time jan 7 rolled around - the ONLY Project Lead left aboard was John Silvetti.

So even Tim Trahan was not on board Jan. 7th?  Where did he go?  So did anyone have footage of the Jan. 7th dive at all?  If not then Silvetti did his job well and betrayed the family completely.  Has anyone asked Jossy about his son and what he has to say about all of this?  Or is that why Jossy has become so quiet lately?   I like Jossy but (sorry) I have always had a rather funny feeling about his motives in all this.  Mostly is appears more political than anything.

Those were my thoughts last night  ::MonkeyHaHa::

Bastribo, I personally think Jossy has some "plaining" to do here.  He was working with Caps and putting out the info in Dairo on the witnesses and the ponds AND he was (I think I read it correctly here) a friend of John Silvetti?  Leaves me with a lot of questions for Jossy.  JMO

Isn't JQK going down to Aruba very soon as well as Hero and potentially Greta??If they all come together on Aruba at one time.Interesting.Has Red or anyone at Scared Monkey's got this information to Greta regarding the cage contents?Also Rob said that Tj Ward sent Greta tapes about witnesses from Colombia connected to paulus i believe.I will look for Rob's post regarding that!


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #788 12/31/08 -
Post by: Tamikosmom on January 01, 2009, 01:43:51 PM
ldstlou wrote:
Tim Miller wasn't removed from anywhere...are you kidding me? You really think he would allow himself to be removed? He was following up a lead in Nicaragua.
------------------


I'm sorry to say - yes he was.  Along with Dateline.

Dec 30th, Kyle and Tim Miller discussed this issue in detail, but they didn't know how to handle it.  Then Kyle took a nap.  When he got up, Tim and Dateline had been ejected from the boat.

ldstlou, I don't know what fairy tales Kyle and others are now telling you, but Kyle's posts (with IP, date and time) are in their original form from when he posted them.  This item was discussed over several posts.

The Nicarauga thing didn't happen for a few more days after that, IIRC.


I cannot comprehend why Lou does not read Kyle's own words on the this topic.

Is it possible that Kyle's supporters actually believe that his words the he posted on the Natalee's Freebird's forum and the Scared Monkey forum ... words that imply that Americans actually assisted in the finale' to the great Aruban coverup ... are going to become a non-issue?

Happy New Year Jen.  Happy New Year All.

Janet


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #788 12/31/08 -
Post by: bleachedblack on January 01, 2009, 01:44:49 PM
keepthefaith,

you are correct.  John Silvetti was the Project Lead (along with Tim Trahan and Tim Miller).

By the time jan 7 rolled around - the ONLY Project Lead left aboard was John Silvetti.

So even Tim Trahan was not on board Jan. 7th?  Where did he go?  So did anyone have footage of the Jan. 7th dive at all?  If not then Silvetti did his job well and betrayed the family completely.  Has anyone asked Jossy about his son and what he has to say about all of this?  Or is that why Jossy has become so quiet lately?   I like Jossy but (sorry) I have always had a rather funny feeling about his motives in all this.  Mostly is appears more political than anything.

Those were my thoughts last night  ::MonkeyHaHa::

Bastribo, I personally think Jossy has some "plaining" to do here.  He was working with Caps and putting out the info in Dairo on the witnesses and the ponds AND he was (I think I read it correctly here) a friend of John Silvetti?  Leaves me with a lot of questions for Jossy.  JMO

.....don't forget the sneaker found in the rocks near the California Lighthouse in 2008.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #788 12/31/08 -
Post by: Tamikosmom on January 01, 2009, 01:49:01 PM
keepthefaith,

you are correct.  John Silvetti was the Project Lead (along with Tim Trahan and Tim Miller).

By the time jan 7 rolled around - the ONLY Project Lead left aboard was John Silvetti.

So even Tim Trahan was not on board Jan. 7th?  Where did he go?  So did anyone have footage of the Jan. 7th dive at all?  If not then Silvetti did his job well and betrayed the family completely.  Has anyone asked Jossy about his son and what he has to say about all of this?  Or is that why Jossy has become so quiet lately?   I like Jossy but (sorry) I have always had a rather funny feeling about his motives in all this.  Mostly is appears more political than anything.

Those were my thoughts last night  ::MonkeyHaHa::

Bastribo, I personally think Jossy has some "plaining" to do here.  He was working with Caps and putting out the info in Dairo on the witnesses and the ponds AND he was (I think I read it correctly here) a friend of John Silvetti?  Leaves me with a lot of questions for Jossy.  JMO


Blue Moon

Considering the CAPS and John Silvetti connection ... I am being to have my doubts regarding Jossy Mansur.

 ::MonkeyWaa::

Janet


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #788 12/31/08 -
Post by: Keepthefaith on January 01, 2009, 01:50:56 PM
Curious if these tapes will ever come into play???


I spoke to TJ earlier and I know some were interested in what was happening with the post I made last week. Well, Greta has the tapes from the FBI informants that were turned over to TJ and Harold Copus when the FBI left Aruba. After last night's Brinkman high season wrecker I can understand that some of this stuff will be coming out in doses and some is much more important that others.

TJ was in Phoenix the last 5 days and is now home. If Greta or someone from her staff calls, TJ will go to Washington discuss what is on the tapes.

These tapes deal with Paulus and Colombian connections and a boat that came in to remove Natalee. That's pretty much all I know and I have never heard the tapes myself, just was TJ told me personally. I only know they exist and have for more than three years. If I knew more, I would tell you what I had heard. These informants were used by the FBI and I believe there could be something there, or the FBI would not have considered them credible and asked them to work with Ward and Copus. I understand there are four informants. I have no idea who they are or where they are from.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #788 12/31/08 -
Post by: texasmom on January 01, 2009, 01:52:41 PM



I'm having my doubts about Jossy too.  I've got a lot of questions.   ::MonkeyNoNo::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #788 12/31/08 -
Post by: Blue Moon on January 01, 2009, 01:55:03 PM
keepthefaith,

you are correct.  John Silvetti was the Project Lead (along with Tim Trahan and Tim Miller).

By the time jan 7 rolled around - the ONLY Project Lead left aboard was John Silvetti.

So even Tim Trahan was not on board Jan. 7th?  Where did he go?  So did anyone have footage of the Jan. 7th dive at all?  If not then Silvetti did his job well and betrayed the family completely.  Has anyone asked Jossy about his son and what he has to say about all of this?  Or is that why Jossy has become so quiet lately?   I like Jossy but (sorry) I have always had a rather funny feeling about his motives in all this.  Mostly is appears more political than anything.

Those were my thoughts last night  ::MonkeyHaHa::

Bastribo, I personally think Jossy has some "plaining" to do here.  He was working with Caps and putting out the info in Dairo on the witnesses and the ponds AND he was (I think I read it correctly here) a friend of John Silvetti?  Leaves me with a lot of questions for Jossy.  JMO


Blue Moon

Considering the CAPS and John Silvetti connection ... I am being to have my doubts regarding Jossy Mansur.

 ::MonkeyWaa::

Janet


I am sorry Janet.  I know you have supported Jossy completely.  I have too to a certain extent but from the very beginning when I watched his reporter all over Aruba saying they were following Natalee and moving her from place to place I just did not have a good feeling about what he/his newspaper were trying to accomplish. 


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #788 12/31/08 -
Post by: Tamikosmom on January 01, 2009, 02:07:31 PM
The focus now needs to be on getting the arubans to acknowledge that contents of the cage were   recovered by aruban divers on Jan 7, 2008, and provide info to whatever was recovered from the cage. Tim Miller (my Hero) and Kyle can give first hand testimony of what they witnessed to the FBI....that needs to be pursued , along with an investigation of all persistence crew members that were on board during the search.  The FBI should lead that investigation to collect testimony in the disappearance/murder of Natalee....obstruction of justice charges should be filed against any crew member that may have withheld evidence of a crime...

EXACTLY!!!

Thank you billb.

Kyle ... according to Edlridge Cleaver ... you can either be part of the solution or part of the problem.  My prayer is that you will become part of the solution.

Lou ... it is also my prayer that you will become part of the solution by taking advantage of your connection with Kyle in encouraging him to do the right thing ... for his sake and ... the sake of the family.

If Natalee Holloway's remains had been in that trap/cage ... in all probability ... the remains have been destroyed in the finale' to the great Aruban coverup.  However ... that truth regarding the Persistence undertaking ... revealed through an investigation by the FBI with the assistance of Kyle Kingman ... would afford a measure of closure for the family.

Janet


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #788 12/31/08 -
Post by: Keepthefaith on January 01, 2009, 02:22:11 PM
As long as the collective goal of any group is the TRUTH.As many of us agree to disagree, the different roads traveled will all end up at the same destination.
TRUTH & JUSTICE.That is my HOPE FOR '09..Stay focused Monkey's.. ::MonkeyDance::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #788 12/31/08 -
Post by: Kermit on January 01, 2009, 02:25:20 PM
Kermit...The first posts I referred to were from I believe November 17th. and What I was referring to was the different ponds. What you posted was taken directly from posts in Shango.  I followed your links and read the discussions. There was also a post about Clyde Burke and Simian, which I have posted about. It concerned Clyde being Simian and Alex Mathew being Shango. The discussions in that thread were about who was Shango and who ws Simian. That was not what came across in your post.

The two questions I asked were about Caps and yourself having email contact, which has now been answered, Thank You. The other was from a post of Memphis', which I quoted, where I asked if there was any way that you could possibly have misinterpreted what Kyle said as did the other poster. Maybe you missed the post.

I was under the impression that Monkeys ask questions, that is how we get answers. My questions may not be important to others but they are to me.

My questions to your posts, are being treated the same way as my questions to Cap's posts were. I was the bad guy then, and now I see I am the bad guy again.

Please help me here, as I am not quite sure of what I have to do to be "forgiven". Do I just stop asking questions and questioning posts? LOL...Kermit...You know that is not going to happen!

Kermit...I have another question for you regarding some posts in the Shango thread. When I can find the posts and the backup, I will post it over there. I have wanted the answers to this for many months now and hopefully you can help me understand why these discussions led to where they did.


MumInOhio
"Maybe you missed the post."




Like I stated before. I did not see your post. I do not doubt your questions are important to you and that is
why I tried to respond to you, when I see the post. I do not want to get caught up in a this and that because you failed to understand I'm not responding to you merely because I DID NOT see your posts on the specific date you gave.

I saw your posts saying I had basically refused to answer you and therefore I'm culpable to your non trusting
me. That's a bit over the top if you ask me. Consider in your thinking that I may not see ALL posts by everyone
including yours. That was the case with yours.

To try to answer you, and I'm not really sure exactly what your referring too, I'm thinking it is when Caps accused me of lying. So here is that post:

#931 on: December 03, 2008, 12:19:56 AM  CAPS
Kermit: why are you stir the monkey cage by lying....I never siad the Moko nor Montanja but the Monserat pond.
If it was the Moko or the Montanja or the Soledad pond, he would have walk straigth home. and we would have not even know where he was since he would have been home and no one would have seen him.

The cemetary is a plausable senario...but after more research that plousable scenario is still under investigation and to make that plausable, we have the search and all the logisctics to make it happend, but that require a lot of more inividual involved.


8. OM give instruction to clean up the Pond but, the Santarosa group did not clean it up, since the ground was still muddy and it was posponed but then the rain came and is now full to the brim. Got new pictures.
9. the pond is now offlimited by a chain across the drive way entrance.

10. spoke to Selvetty and asked a lot of question...
http://scaredmonkeys.net/index.php?topic=4182.msg564838#msg564838

 
To which my response to him was it was NOT me that LIED, CAPS lied:

CAPS STARTS OUT SAYING IT WAS MONTANA POND

January 22, 2008:

 Well it says clearley the montana pond.

After this Joran at this time desided to despose of the body in Montana body of water.

January 27, 2008:

 

but the real body was dumped in a body of water in noord that has not been search

The MUI was a diversion for something else.

The day the search was in noord and the body of water that was search by the police was not to retrieve a body, bud to retrieve something else

The drop has happend but is not the body natalee drop.

 

February 1, 2008:

In my report I choose the White one but my road is not paved

The Montana Park Apartment is where all started..The Sex etc....

so look for the owners


Feb 26, 2008 CAPS POSTED: The pond in question (MOKO) is right out near the Whitehouse Apartment
The pond in question (MOKO) is right out near the Whitehouse Apartment.
http://scaredmonkeys.net/index.php?topic=1952.2720


CAPS posted: Reply #2729 on: February 26, 2008, 10:36:09 AM
Look for Noord and look for Moko.
http://scaredmonkeys.net/index.php?topic=1952.2720

Find Aruba. Look for Noord. Look for Montaña. Look for Moko
CAPS posted:  Reply #7 on: April 15, 2008, 09:24:02 AM »
they where located in Moko and where in the massages bussines
now lets look at the addess to the Dutch Apartmnts

CAPS posted:
one is called the Whitehouse or MOKO 30
http://scaredmonkeys.net/index.php?topic=2787.0


ANSWER TO YOUR OTHER QUESTION
Caps has more then one computer he logs into SM.
That will account for his different IP numbers.
Not all his IPs show up from Aruba. One was from NY, one from France.


 


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #788 12/31/08 -
Post by: Keepthefaith on January 01, 2009, 02:25:39 PM
Heyy Janet?Did Kermit turn off the lanterns next to the pond after her New year's with Miss Piggy?? ::MonkeyLaugh:: ::MonkeyLaugh::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #788 12/31/08 -
Post by: Kermit on January 01, 2009, 02:29:06 PM
Another thing I am totally confused on. Since Caps made his appearance in the Shango thread, about a week before his first post in this Forum, I took an interest in him.

So do I have this right...all the times I have caught Caps logging in from Aruba and going to a particular page using more than one IP are from a "device"?

But the times that others caught him logging on he was not using "device" and he was not in Aruba?

I don't have a clue what dates I happened upon him logging in, but I do know that they were from Aruba...Except one. Maybe my computer will be ready tomorrow and I can check.



Internet Cafe? :scratch:

Very possible Columbo that anyone including Caps could be posting from an Internet Cafe.


CAPS posts at evening hours:
April 16 1:16 a.m.
April 19-1 10 a.m.-139 a.m
April 19- 2:31 p.m.-246 p.m.
April 19-752 p.m.-1046 p.m..
April 21-2 18 a.m.
April 22-1138 a.m.- 6:01 p.m.
April 22-828 p.m.-8:36 p.m.
April 22-1139 p.m.-1152 p.m.
April 23-1209 a.m.-1:40 a.m
April 23-1059 a.m.-12:40 p.m..xxxxx
April 23-3 22 p.m.-520 p.m.
April 23-1006 p.m.-10:19 p.m.
April 24-241 a.m.-3:11 a.m
April 24-10:28 a.m.-1034 a.m.xxxxxxxx
April 24-1:30 p.m.-703 p.m.
April 24 10:57 p.m.-12:57 a.m.
April 25-12:36 p.m.-335 p.m.xxxxxxxxx
April 25-607 p.m.-1058 p.m.
April 26-306 p.m.
April 28-103 a.m.-2:09 a.m.
April 28-127 p.m.xxxxxxxx
May 5-949 p.m.-1146 p.m.
May 6-1207 a.m.
May 8-134 a.m.-2:23 a.m.
May 8-1035 a.m.-11:48 a.m.xxxxxxxx
May 9-1224 a.m.-1:43 a.m.
May 9-4:37 p.m.-721 p.m.-and---- 11:52 p.m.
May 10-1229 a.m.-224 a.m.
May 19-1 12 a.m.
May 20-4 10 p.m.-4:16 p.m.
June 2-243 a.m.
June 13-3 30 am-358 am
June 2-1233 a.m.- 243 a.m




Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #788 12/31/08 -
Post by: Kermit on January 01, 2009, 02:30:26 PM
Heyy Janet?Did Kermit turn off the lanterns next to the pond after her New year's with Miss Piggy?? ::MonkeyLaugh:: ::MonkeyLaugh::

Miss Piggy said she is an "indoor pig"
George Cloony's pig is indoors and she is an indoor pig too!
So, I had to sit alone next to the lanterns, until New Years Eve when I suddenly
received a KISS!



Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #788 12/31/08 -
Post by: Blue Moon on January 01, 2009, 02:31:04 PM
Another thing I am totally confused on. Since Caps made his appearance in the Shango thread, about a week before his first post in this Forum, I took an interest in him.

So do I have this right...all the times I have caught Caps logging in from Aruba and going to a particular page using more than one IP are from a "device"?

But the times that others caught him logging on he was not using "device" and he was not in Aruba?

I don't have a clue what dates I happened upon him logging in, but I do know that they were from Aruba...Except one. Maybe my computer will be ready tomorrow and I can check.



Internet Cafe? :scratch:

Very possible Columbo that anyone including Caps could be posting from an Internet Cafe.


CAPS posts at evening hours:
April 16 1:16 a.m.
April 19-1 10 a.m.-139 a.m
April 19- 2:31 p.m.-246 p.m.
April 19-752 p.m.-1046 p.m..
April 21-2 18 a.m.
April 22-1138 a.m.- 6:01 p.m.
April 22-828 p.m.-8:36 p.m.
April 22-1139 p.m.-1152 p.m.
April 23-1209 a.m.-1:40 a.m
April 23-1059 a.m.-12:40 p.m..xxxxx
April 23-3 22 p.m.-520 p.m.
April 23-1006 p.m.-10:19 p.m.
April 24-241 a.m.-3:11 a.m
April 24-10:28 a.m.-1034 a.m.xxxxxxxx
April 24-1:30 p.m.-703 p.m.
April 24 10:57 p.m.-12:57 a.m.
April 25-12:36 p.m.-335 p.m.xxxxxxxxx
April 25-607 p.m.-1058 p.m.
April 26-306 p.m.
April 28-103 a.m.-2:09 a.m.
April 28-127 p.m.xxxxxxxx
May 5-949 p.m.-1146 p.m.
May 6-1207 a.m.
May 8-134 a.m.-2:23 a.m.
May 8-1035 a.m.-11:48 a.m.xxxxxxxx
May 9-1224 a.m.-1:43 a.m.
May 9-4:37 p.m.-721 p.m.-and---- 11:52 p.m.
May 10-1229 a.m.-224 a.m.
May 19-1 12 a.m.
May 20-4 10 p.m.-4:16 p.m.
June 2-243 a.m.
June 13-3 30 am-358 am
June 2-1233 a.m.- 243 a.m




Hi Kermit, I hope Caps is not Depak Kalpoe.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #788 12/31/08 -
Post by: Kermit on January 01, 2009, 02:31:31 PM
ldstlou wrote:
Tim Miller wasn't removed from anywhere...are you kidding me? You really think he would allow himself to be removed? He was following up a lead in Nicaragua.
------------------


I'm sorry to say - yes he was.  Along with Dateline.

Dec 30th, Kyle and Tim Miller discussed this issue in detail, but they didn't know how to handle it.  Then Kyle took a nap.  When he got up, Tim and Dateline had been ejected from the boat.

ldstlou, I don't know what fairy tales Kyle and others are now telling you, but Kyle's posts (with IP, date and time) are in their original form from when he posted them.  This item was discussed over several posts.

The Nicarauga thing didn't happen for a few more days after that, IIRC.



Exactly, Jen.  IIRC, Kyle stated that Dec 30th was "crushing" - that Tim Miller and Dateline were REMOVED from the boat.



At who's request would they have been removed from the ship?  By Mos or John Silvetti?  They is all unreal that this could have happened.  Kyle specifically asked us what we thought they should do IF they found Natalee's remains and it was a resounding "Take her remains and leave and bring her home to her family". 

This may have already been answered, just trying to catch up here.

Tim Miller was removed by John Silvetti himself on December 30th.

And it was actually private eye who posed the question about if remains were found - on December 30th

Thanks Jen.  So who was in charge on this ship, John Silvetti or Schaffer?  Who was calling the shots with the Arubans?

John Silvetti was project manager and according to Kyle it was John who talked to the Arubans including Hans Mos.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #788 12/31/08 -
Post by: Blue Moon on January 01, 2009, 02:34:47 PM
ldstlou wrote:
Tim Miller wasn't removed from anywhere...are you kidding me? You really think he would allow himself to be removed? He was following up a lead in Nicaragua.
------------------


I'm sorry to say - yes he was.  Along with Dateline.

Dec 30th, Kyle and Tim Miller discussed this issue in detail, but they didn't know how to handle it.  Then Kyle took a nap.  When he got up, Tim and Dateline had been ejected from the boat.

ldstlou, I don't know what fairy tales Kyle and others are now telling you, but Kyle's posts (with IP, date and time) are in their original form from when he posted them.  This item was discussed over several posts.

The Nicarauga thing didn't happen for a few more days after that, IIRC.



Exactly, Jen.  IIRC, Kyle stated that Dec 30th was "crushing" - that Tim Miller and Dateline were REMOVED from the boat.



At who's request would they have been removed from the ship?  By Mos or John Silvetti?  They is all unreal that this could have happened.  Kyle specifically asked us what we thought they should do IF they found Natalee's remains and it was a resounding "Take her remains and leave and bring her home to her family". 

This may have already been answered, just trying to catch up here.

Tim Miller was removed by John Silvetti himself on December 30th.

And it was actually private eye who posed the question about if remains were found - on December 30th

Thanks Jen.  So who was in charge on this ship, John Silvetti or Schaffer?  Who was calling the shots with the Arubans?

John Silvetti was project manager and according to Kyle it was John who talked to the Arubans including Hans Mos.


So was Kyle on board Jan. 7th and did he not attempt to take any pictures of the divers removing the contents of the cage or was he off the ship?


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #788 12/31/08 -
Post by: Kermit on January 01, 2009, 02:37:06 PM

Ummm, are these posts written by the same person?  The second post contains parts that are more literate than the first post.  Almost like the second post is written by someone who has a good grasp of the English language, but is purposely trying to disguise that.

 :wink:

Yes, Finngirl posted something last night and it was very insightful about the initials and how Caps was telling them something that was not true. Since he lives in Aruba, one would think he would know and he didn't.

Finngirl caught it! Good job!

ya know, I made that post in april

I'd noticed things/pointed them out,
as did many others

but we got the brush-off ...
all questions were pushed aside

the train had left the station
and it had only one pre-determined destination:
Capsville

I, along w/ many others, spent months/years
in the codetalkers forum
and we need/deserve an explanation



I was paying attention, even if no one else was. You did a good job.





Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #788 12/31/08 -
Post by: Tamikosmom on January 01, 2009, 02:42:06 PM

Like Art Wood said on Dana "This was a professional coverup".

San ... this is why I have concluded that justice will never come out of an Aruban or Dutch courtroom for Natalee Holloway.  The domino effect of accountability is too far reaching.  It is has gone far beyond those who participated in the events encompassing the morning of May 30, 2005.  It is all about the sons of the elite ... it is about those in the Aruban/Dutch administration would were involved in the coverup that has prevented justice from prevailing for Natalee Holloway.

Janet

+++++++

The Jonesboro Sun
January 29, 2007


Twitty recalled the first days after her daughter's disappearance and the actions of the Aruban government.

"We did everything we could in looking for her.  There was a government coverup, and it has been documented," Twitty contended.

http://www.jonesborosun.com/story.php?ID=25809


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #788 12/31/08 -
Post by: Magnolia on January 01, 2009, 02:42:35 PM
Kermit...The first posts I referred to were from I believe November 17th. and What I was referring to was the different ponds. What you posted was taken directly from posts in Shango.  I followed your links and read the discussions. There was also a post about Clyde Burke and Simian, which I have posted about. It concerned Clyde being Simian and Alex Mathew being Shango. The discussions in that thread were about who was Shango and who ws Simian. That was not what came across in your post.

The two questions I asked were about Caps and yourself having email contact, which has now been answered, Thank You. The other was from a post of Memphis', which I quoted, where I asked if there was any way that you could possibly have misinterpreted what Kyle said as did the other poster. Maybe you missed the post.

I was under the impression that Monkeys ask questions, that is how we get answers. My questions may not be important to others but they are to me.

My questions to your posts, are being treated the same way as my questions to Cap's posts were. I was the bad guy then, and now I see I am the bad guy again.

Please help me here, as I am not quite sure of what I have to do to be "forgiven". Do I just stop asking questions and questioning posts? LOL...Kermit...You know that is not going to happen!

Kermit...I have another question for you regarding some posts in the Shango thread. When I can find the posts and the backup, I will post it over there. I have wanted the answers to this for many months now and hopefully you can help me understand why these discussions led to where they did.


MumInOhio
"Maybe you missed the post."




Like I stated before. I did not see your post. I do not doubt your questions are important to you and that is
why I tried to respond to you, when I see the post. I do not want to get caught up in a this and that because you failed to understand I'm not responding to you merely because I DID NOT see your posts on the specific date you gave.

I saw your posts saying I had basically refused to answer you and therefore I'm culpable to your non trusting
me. That's a bit over the top if you ask me. Consider in your thinking that I may not see ALL posts by everyone
including yours. That was the case with yours.

To try to answer you, and I'm not really sure exactly what your referring too, I'm thinking it is when Caps accused me of lying. So here is that post:

#931 on: December 03, 2008, 12:19:56 AM  CAPS
Kermit: why are you stir the monkey cage by lying....I never siad the Moko nor Montanja but the Monserat pond.
If it was the Moko or the Montanja or the Soledad pond, he would have walk straigth home. and we would have not even know where he was since he would have been home and no one would have seen him.

The cemetary is a plausable senario...but after more research that plousable scenario is still under investigation and to make that plausable, we have the search and all the logisctics to make it happend, but that require a lot of more inividual involved.


8. OM give instruction to clean up the Pond but, the Santarosa group did not clean it up, since the ground was still muddy and it was posponed but then the rain came and is now full to the brim. Got new pictures.
9. the pond is now offlimited by a chain across the drive way entrance.

10. spoke to Selvetty and asked a lot of question...
http://scaredmonkeys.net/index.php?topic=4182.msg564838#msg564838

 
To which my response to him was it was NOT me that LIED, CAPS lied:

CAPS STARTS OUT SAYING IT WAS MONTANA POND

January 22, 2008:

 Well it says clearley the montana pond.

After this Joran at this time desided to despose of the body in Montana body of water.

January 27, 2008:

 

but the real body was dumped in a body of water in noord that has not been search

The MUI was a diversion for something else.

The day the search was in noord and the body of water that was search by the police was not to retrieve a body, bud to retrieve something else

The drop has happend but is not the body natalee drop.

 

February 1, 2008:

In my report I choose the White one but my road is not paved

The Montana Park Apartment is where all started..The Sex etc....

so look for the owners


Feb 26, 2008 CAPS POSTED: The pond in question (MOKO) is right out near the Whitehouse Apartment
The pond in question (MOKO) is right out near the Whitehouse Apartment.
http://scaredmonkeys.net/index.php?topic=1952.2720


CAPS posted: Reply #2729 on: February 26, 2008, 10:36:09 AM
Look for Noord and look for Moko.
http://scaredmonkeys.net/index.php?topic=1952.2720

Find Aruba. Look for Noord. Look for Montaña. Look for Moko
CAPS posted:  Reply #7 on: April 15, 2008, 09:24:02 AM »
they where located in Moko and where in the massages bussines
now lets look at the addess to the Dutch Apartmnts

CAPS posted:
one is called the Whitehouse or MOKO 30
http://scaredmonkeys.net/index.php?topic=2787.0


ANSWER TO YOUR OTHER QUESTION
Caps has more then one computer he logs into SM.
That will account for his different IP numbers.
Not all his IPs show up from Aruba. One was from NY, one from France.


 

That is the post that I tried to tell her about yesterday, thanks frog.

Now SS has some questions for you a few pages back.
I think she is asking if remains and a tennis shoe were
found in the Monserat Pond or not, and if the Matty Apts
are revelant.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #788 12/31/08 -
Post by: Tamikosmom on January 01, 2009, 02:45:56 PM

So was Kyle on board Jan. 7th and did he not attempt to take any pictures of the divers removing the contents of the cage or was he off the ship?

Kyle: The bags were removed just after the ROV got out of the way when the divers took the samples to their boat.... and took off


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #788 12/31/08 -
Post by: wreck on January 01, 2009, 02:47:22 PM
keepthefaith,

you are correct.  John Silvetti was the Project Lead (along with Tim Trahan and Tim Miller).

By the time jan 7 rolled around - the ONLY Project Lead left aboard was John Silvetti.

So even Tim Trahan was not on board Jan. 7th?  Where did he go?  So did anyone have footage of the Jan. 7th dive at all?  If not then Silvetti did his job well and betrayed the family completely.  Has anyone asked Jossy about his son and what he has to say about all of this?  Or is that why Jossy has become so quiet lately?   I like Jossy but (sorry) I have always had a rather funny feeling about his motives in all this.  Mostly is appears more political than anything.

Those were my thoughts last night  ::MonkeyHaHa::

Bastribo, I personally think Jossy has some "plaining" to do here.  He was working with Caps and putting out the info in Dairo on the witnesses and the ponds AND he was (I think I read it correctly here) a friend of John Silvetti?  Leaves me with a lot of questions for Jossy.  JMO


Blue Moon

Considering the CAPS and John Silvetti connection ... I am being to have my doubts regarding Jossy Mansur.

 ::MonkeyWaa::

Janet

::MonkeyEek::  ::MonkeyWink::
I know that doesn't come easily for you. I respect that!


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #788 12/31/08 -
Post by: Blonde on January 01, 2009, 02:48:36 PM
Kermit,
I have company and have been trying to cook and keep up, not an easy task.

Are you saying that Caps was a total diversion from the beginning?  If so, how did that come about if you know?

I'm still in shock that Dave is still trusting MIP6!   ::MonkeyShocked::

Thanks in advance, and Happy New Year!




Trusting MIP6 is not the word for it Robin and Dave are friends with him.
 After he bashed Natalee and her saint hood and Beth all over the internet.
Robin posts with MIP6 at BNH.
 I was told by a reliable sorce they have had drinks together.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #788 12/31/08 -
Post by: Kermit on January 01, 2009, 02:48:49 PM
Kermit - I have spent hours thinking and now, as usual, I have a lot of questions.  Would you please tell us more about the pond and why you think the sneaker and some human remains have been put there.  Do you know who drained the pond in March - was it ALE , Jossy, Ecotech, Silvetti, or nobody?  We were told that 40 - 50 Dutch forensic experts searched the dry pond and the surrounding neighborhood at night under the lights.  Last night the Freebirds were saying that this didn't happen.  If the pond story isn't true, then the pond witness isn't true.  Is the Matty Apt. story true? 


#674 on: Today at 10:40:21 AM   SS
Kermit - I have spent hours thinking and now, as usual, I have a lot of questions.  Would you please tell us more about the pond and why you think the sneaker and some human remains have been put there.  Do you know who drained the pond in March - was it ALE , Jossy, Ecotech, Silvetti, or nobody?  We were told that 40 - 50 Dutch forensic experts searched the dry pond and the surrounding neighborhood at night under the lights.  Last night the Freebirds were saying that this didn't happen.  If the pond story isn't true, then the pond witness isn't true.  Is the Matty Apt. story true?
http://scaredmonkeys.net/index.php?topic=4328.msg607178#msg607178

 
#926 on: December 03, 2008, 12:03:25 AM   SS
Speaking of Imelda's shoes brings a question to mind about Urine's shoes.  The pond witness saw him walking without one shoe.  Did he specify if Urine was missing a right shoe or a left shoe?  Supposedly there was a bloody shoe in Urine's closet that Paulass could have disposed of several days later.  Can we determine if it's a right shoe or a left shoe in the cage?  This could possibly clear up all of these shoes, especially since there are reports that one of Urine's shoes was also found in Monserat pond.
http://scaredmonkeys.net/index.php?topic=4182.msg564821#msg564821

ACCORDING TO CAPS
March 8, 2008 CAPS POSTED - "I hope tomorrow we will have the final links into a final resolution about the pond. This coming week is THE DAY.
Me and J & W and the C's are all in agreement now that it must be there.
scaredmonkeys.net/index.php?topic=2680.560

FEB 28th - CAPS posts at SM that he is going to go there at 9:00 The sneaker is there

Nov. 20, 2008 -
 VAN SUSTEREN: All right. Did the -- did -- was there ever any follow-up to see whether or not your witness had information that was truly helpful? Did Hans Mos, even though he didn't believe him -- did he at least assign someone to go out and investigate and look at that pond area?

HOLLOWAY: No, he didn't. You know, we had asked him to. And in fact, we had planned to go excavate the pond ourselves, and these hurricanes came through and one came close to Aruba and filled the pond back up with water. It's still our plan to go back. I think Hans Mos and I discussed, you know, Natalee's not in the pond, but we believe that, you know, he could possibly find a tennis shoe, maybe her driver's license or even some of Natalee's clothing, which would help lead into, you know, the timeline. And also, this witness implicates Paulus van der Sloot. So if that's the case, you know, that needs to be done.
http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,455069,00.html


ACCORDING TO KYLE
May 16 - Kyle posted: I think it is highly unlikely and completely inconsistent with numerous testimonies and other evidence that the pond (or anything but the ocean) contains Natalee's remains. The witness claims to have seen a muddy Joran coming out of the Monserat pond after disposing of her body.
<snip>
The 40+ investigators brought in from Holland never stepped foot in the pond


ACCORDING TO JOHN SILVETTI]b]
John Silvetti's email to Kyle: The Polis did not drain that pond and they did not search it, period!

ACCORDING TO JOSSY
#915 on: June 04, 2008, 09:42:53 PM   *******

I am confused just about one thing..Jossy said he didn't know anything about the search at Montserat Pond,except for a rumor from a witness about Joran in the area..We all saw the pictures..We all heard what OE and Caps said,,WTF? That Pond did not drain by itself and remove a top layer of soil 10-20 feet across in one section by itself. You can fool some of the people some of the time,but you cant fool us any of the time.
http://scaredmonkeys.net/index.php?topic=2879.msg387020#msg387020

ACCORDING TO HOTSHOT - source for CAPS
Hotshot posted:
CAPS knows Silvetti from me  Silvetti did do the pond and then they wouldnt let him back in after all the maps were made of the pond.
http://scaredmonkeys.net/index.php?topic=4159.msg553102#msg553102

BACK in July 11, 2006, 05:39:05 PM »
Hotshot: "I just feel those ponds that "WONT" be searched is a place that needs to be.
http://scaredmonkeys.net/index.php?topic=63.msg13147#msg13147


John did go back to work with CAPS 2 times that I know of, to Aruba, about the Monstart pond.  He was with CAPS the whole time,
http://scaredmonkeys.net/index.php?topic=4173.msg555976#msg555976







Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #788 12/31/08 -
Post by: always 1 on January 01, 2009, 02:52:03 PM
Wreck email


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #788 12/31/08 -
Post by: Tamikosmom on January 01, 2009, 02:52:28 PM
Heyy Janet?Did Kermit turn off the lanterns next to the pond after her New year's with Miss Piggy?? ::MonkeyLaugh:: ::MonkeyLaugh::

Miss Piggy said she is an "indoor pig"
George Cloony's pig is indoors and she is an indoor pig too!
So, I had to sit alone next to the lanterns, until New Years Eve when I suddenly
received a KISS!



  ::MonkeyShocked::

 ::MonkeyWaa::

Kermit ... please come up to the house.  I have put on a pot of Tim Horton's coffee and a pot of green tea.  Your choice.  I am in the process of toasting seseame seed bagels.  Toasted bagels with cream cheese, tomatoes, cucumbers, avocato and lettuce ... YUMMY!!!.

Happy New Year Kermit.

Janet


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #788 12/31/08 -
Post by: Lifesong on January 01, 2009, 02:54:00 PM
I would rather chase Marcos and the reporter for the truth as they are real people we may be able to find.. Tim and Dave could help Find them..
Then we might get someplace.


I thought Marcos was a no-show in Nicaragua.

Was he just a ruse to get Tim off the Persistence and occupied elsewhere?


Anna,

IMO, this was the "news" that came out of all the posts in the last couple of days.  Tim was already off the Persistence when Dave asked him to go to Nicaragua.  He was removed from the ship by Silvetti over a disagreement on December 30th.  The day of the visual inspection dive on the cage. 

Poor Dave.  Can you imagine that phone call?  He's got Silvetti in charge of the search, and Tim Miller on board to be his (Dave's) eyes and ears.  Tim calls bullsh*t on the visual of the cage and gets put off the boat!!

If this is true, wth is Tim doing working with Silvetti since then?

 ::MonkeyNoNo:: ::MonkeyNoNo:: ::MonkeyNoNo::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #788 12/31/08 -
Post by: Blue Moon on January 01, 2009, 02:57:28 PM
I would rather chase Marcos and the reporter for the truth as they are real people we may be able to find.. Tim and Dave could help Find them..
Then we might get someplace.


I thought Marcos was a no-show in Nicaragua.

Was he just a ruse to get Tim off the Persistence and occupied elsewhere?


Anna,

IMO, this was the "news" that came out of all the posts in the last couple of days.  Tim was already off the Persistence when Dave asked him to go to Nicaragua.  He was removed from the ship by Silvetti over a disagreement on December 30th.  The day of the visual inspection dive on the cage. 

Poor Dave.  Can you imagine that phone call?  He's got Silvetti in charge of the search, and Tim Miller on board to be his (Dave's) eyes and ears.  Tim calls bullsh*t on the visual of the cage and gets put off the boat!!

If this is true, wth is Tim doing working with Silvetti since then?

 ::MonkeyNoNo:: ::MonkeyNoNo:: ::MonkeyNoNo::

Amen to that one.  But giving Tim the benefit of the doubt, he is such a kind-hearted person I really don't think he would ever believe any of this could happen.  THEY said they were there to bring Natalee home not to give her over to the Arubans to dispose of.  You couldn't make this stuff up if you wanted to.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #788 12/31/08 -
Post by: Blue Moon on January 01, 2009, 03:00:42 PM
I want to add one more thing to my above post:  IF this was remains in the cage.   This puts us back to the MAIN question:  If these were remains in the cage WERE they Natalee's remains?  If it is Natalee's remains THEN the Persistence's aided and abetted the Aruban government to cover it up.  Not the results Natalee's family were looking for and were promised by John Silvetti.  (JMO)   ::MonkeyNoNo::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #788 12/31/08 -
Post by: Tamikosmom on January 01, 2009, 03:01:19 PM
Well Monkeys ... it is snowing again but ... hubby and I will attempt another treck into the big city.  New Years Day is the time for celebrating in the Japanese tradition so ... a family reunion of sorts on hubby's side of the family is where it is at for those who can make it.  My daughter and family are driving into Vancouver for the party from the Eastern Fraser Valley but ... both sons, DILs and grandson will be a no show ... other plans with inlaws.  I hate sharing.

 ::MonkeyWaa::

Tomorrow after getting the tree down and putting decorations away ... everything will be back to normal.

 ::cartwheel::

I love routine.

HAPPY NEW YEAR!!

Janet
11:55 AM PT

 


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #788 12/31/08 -
Post by: Kermit on January 01, 2009, 03:02:22 PM
ldstlou wrote:
Tim Miller wasn't removed from anywhere...are you kidding me? You really think he would allow himself to be removed? He was following up a lead in Nicaragua.
------------------


I'm sorry to say - yes he was.  Along with Dateline.

Dec 30th, Kyle and Tim Miller discussed this issue in detail, but they didn't know how to handle it.  Then Kyle took a nap.  When he got up, Tim and Dateline had been ejected from the boat.

ldstlou, I don't know what fairy tales Kyle and others are now telling you, but Kyle's posts (with IP, date and time) are in their original form from when he posted them.  This item was discussed over several posts.

The Nicarauga thing didn't happen for a few more days after that, IIRC.



Exactly, Jen.  IIRC, Kyle stated that Dec 30th was "crushing" - that Tim Miller and Dateline were REMOVED from the boat.



At who's request would they have been removed from the ship?  By Mos or John Silvetti?  They is all unreal that this could have happened.  Kyle specifically asked us what we thought they should do IF they found Natalee's remains and it was a resounding "Take her remains and leave and bring her home to her family". 

This may have already been answered, just trying to catch up here.

Tim Miller was removed by John Silvetti himself on December 30th.

And it was actually private eye who posed the question about if remains were found - on December 30th

Thanks Jen.  So who was in charge on this ship, John Silvetti or Schaffer?  Who was calling the shots with the Arubans?

John Silvetti was project manager and according to Kyle it was John who talked to the Arubans including Hans Mos.


So was Kyle on board Jan. 7th and did he not attempt to take any pictures of the divers removing the contents of the cage or was he off the ship?

Kyle was on board and so was John Silvetti. According to Kyle, the ROV unit was filming the Aruban divers as they retried the evidence from the cage and they dove from their boat and returned to their boat.



Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #788 12/31/08 -
Post by: Kermit on January 01, 2009, 03:04:15 PM
Heyy Janet?Did Kermit turn off the lanterns next to the pond after her New year's with Miss Piggy?? ::MonkeyLaugh:: ::MonkeyLaugh::

Miss Piggy said she is an "indoor pig"
George Cloony's pig is indoors and she is an indoor pig too!
So, I had to sit alone next to the lanterns, until New Years Eve when I suddenly
received a KISS!



  ::MonkeyShocked::

 ::MonkeyWaa::

Kermit ... please come up to the house.  I have put on a pot of Tim Horton's coffee and a pot of green tea.  Your choice.  I am in the process of toasting seseame seed bagels.  Toasted bagels with cream cheese, tomatoes, cucumbers, avocato and lettuce ... YUMMY!!!.

Happy New Year Kermit.

Janet

Shh! Don't tell Miss Piggy, I'll hop on over.
That sounded way too tempting. Miss Piggy never feeds me.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #788 12/31/08 -
Post by: Blue Moon on January 01, 2009, 03:04:58 PM
ldstlou wrote:
Tim Miller wasn't removed from anywhere...are you kidding me? You really think he would allow himself to be removed? He was following up a lead in Nicaragua.
------------------


I'm sorry to say - yes he was.  Along with Dateline.

Dec 30th, Kyle and Tim Miller discussed this issue in detail, but they didn't know how to handle it.  Then Kyle took a nap.  When he got up, Tim and Dateline had been ejected from the boat.

ldstlou, I don't know what fairy tales Kyle and others are now telling you, but Kyle's posts (with IP, date and time) are in their original form from when he posted them.  This item was discussed over several posts.

The Nicarauga thing didn't happen for a few more days after that, IIRC.



Exactly, Jen.  IIRC, Kyle stated that Dec 30th was "crushing" - that Tim Miller and Dateline were REMOVED from the boat.



At who's request would they have been removed from the ship?  By Mos or John Silvetti?  They is all unreal that this could have happened.  Kyle specifically asked us what we thought they should do IF they found Natalee's remains and it was a resounding "Take her remains and leave and bring her home to her family". 

This may have already been answered, just trying to catch up here.

Tim Miller was removed by John Silvetti himself on December 30th.

And it was actually private eye who posed the question about if remains were found - on December 30th

Thanks Jen.  So who was in charge on this ship, John Silvetti or Schaffer?  Who was calling the shots with the Arubans?

John Silvetti was project manager and according to Kyle it was John who talked to the Arubans including Hans Mos.


So was Kyle on board Jan. 7th and did he not attempt to take any pictures of the divers removing the contents of the cage or was he off the ship?

Kyle was on board and so was John Silvetti. According to Kyle, the ROV unit was filming the Aruban divers as they retried the evidence from the cage and they dove from their boat and returned to their boat.



And the pictures of these-Is the FBI and family in possession of these pictures from the ROV?  OR is that the pictures you posted here? 


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #788 12/31/08 -
Post by: San on January 01, 2009, 03:06:50 PM
I want to add one more thing to my above post:  IF this was remains in the cage.   This puts us back to the MAIN question:  If these were remains in the cage WERE they Natalee's remains?  If it is Natalee's remains THEN the Persistence's aided and abetted the Aruban government to cover it up.  Not the results Natalee's family were looking for and were promised by John Silvetti.  (JMO)   ::MonkeyNoNo::

Would this make them "American Traitors"


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #788 12/31/08 -
Post by: Kermit on January 01, 2009, 03:07:03 PM
ldstlou wrote:
Tim Miller wasn't removed from anywhere...are you kidding me? You really think he would allow himself to be removed? He was following up a lead in Nicaragua.
------------------


I'm sorry to say - yes he was.  Along with Dateline.

Dec 30th, Kyle and Tim Miller discussed this issue in detail, but they didn't know how to handle it.  Then Kyle took a nap.  When he got up, Tim and Dateline had been ejected from the boat.

ldstlou, I don't know what fairy tales Kyle and others are now telling you, but Kyle's posts (with IP, date and time) are in their original form from when he posted them.  This item was discussed over several posts.

The Nicarauga thing didn't happen for a few more days after that, IIRC.



Exactly, Jen.  IIRC, Kyle stated that Dec 30th was "crushing" - that Tim Miller and Dateline were REMOVED from the boat.



At who's request would they have been removed from the ship?  By Mos or John Silvetti?  They is all unreal that this could have happened.  Kyle specifically asked us what we thought they should do IF they found Natalee's remains and it was a resounding "Take her remains and leave and bring her home to her family". 

This may have already been answered, just trying to catch up here.

Tim Miller was removed by John Silvetti himself on December 30th.

And it was actually private eye who posed the question about if remains were found - on December 30th

Thanks Jen.  So who was in charge on this ship, John Silvetti or Schaffer?  Who was calling the shots with the Arubans?

John Silvetti was project manager and according to Kyle it was John who talked to the Arubans including Hans Mos.


So was Kyle on board Jan. 7th and did he not attempt to take any pictures of the divers removing the contents of the cage or was he off the ship?

Kyle was on board and so was John Silvetti. According to Kyle, the ROV unit was filming the Aruban divers as they retried the evidence from the cage and they dove from their boat and returned to their boat.



And the pictures of these-Is the FBI and family in possession of these pictures from the ROV?  OR is that the pictures you posted here? 

Yes those are in possession of the family and fbi and john q. kelly.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #788 12/31/08 -
Post by: texasmom on January 01, 2009, 03:07:51 PM
Well Monkeys ... it is snowing again but ... hubby and I will attempt another treck into the big city.  New Years Day is the time for celebrating in the Japanese tradition so ... a family reunion of sorts on hubby's side of the family is where it is at for those who can make it.  My daughter and family are driving into Vancouver for the party from the Eastern Fraser Valley but ... both sons, DILs and grandson will be a no show ... other plans with inlaws.  I hate sharing.

 ::MonkeyWaa::

Tomorrow after getting the tree down and putting decorations away ... everything will be back to normal.

 ::cartwheel::

I love routine.

HAPPY NEW YEAR!!

Janet
11:55 AM PT

 

I hope you have a wonderful day Janet!  I'm preparing a New Year's Day Feast for the family, youngest son requested more dressing like I made for Christmas!  (Gained huge brownie points)  Baking a ham for them, and a large crow for me!   ::MonkeyWink::  

Happy New Year!


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #788 12/31/08 -
Post by: Keepthefaith on January 01, 2009, 03:09:28 PM
Any thoughts from you CapsLockwizard??


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #788 12/31/08 -
Post by: Tamikosmom on January 01, 2009, 03:09:55 PM
ldstlou wrote:
Tim Miller wasn't removed from anywhere...are you kidding me? You really think he would allow himself to be removed? He was following up a lead in Nicaragua.
------------------


I'm sorry to say - yes he was.  Along with Dateline.

Dec 30th, Kyle and Tim Miller discussed this issue in detail, but they didn't know how to handle it.  Then Kyle took a nap.  When he got up, Tim and Dateline had been ejected from the boat.

ldstlou, I don't know what fairy tales Kyle and others are now telling you, but Kyle's posts (with IP, date and time) are in their original form from when he posted them.  This item was discussed over several posts.

The Nicarauga thing didn't happen for a few more days after that, IIRC.



Exactly, Jen.  IIRC, Kyle stated that Dec 30th was "crushing" - that Tim Miller and Dateline were REMOVED from the boat.



At who's request would they have been removed from the ship?  By Mos or John Silvetti?  They is all unreal that this could have happened.  Kyle specifically asked us what we thought they should do IF they found Natalee's remains and it was a resounding "Take her remains and leave and bring her home to her family". 

This may have already been answered, just trying to catch up here.

Tim Miller was removed by John Silvetti himself on December 30th.

And it was actually private eye who posed the question about if remains were found - on December 30th

Thanks Jen.  So who was in charge on this ship, John Silvetti or Schaffer?  Who was calling the shots with the Arubans?

John Silvetti was project manager and according to Kyle it was John who talked to the Arubans including Hans Mos.


So was Kyle on board Jan. 7th and did he not attempt to take any pictures of the divers removing the contents of the cage or was he off the ship?

Kyle was on board and so was John Silvetti. According to Kyle, the ROV unit was filming the Aruban divers as they retried the evidence from the cage and they dove from their boat and returned to their boat.




KYLE KINGMAN - SCARED MONKEY FORUM

oceanexploration
Re: Natalee Case Discussion #744 3/19 -
« Reply #201 on: March 19, 2008, 08:21:47 PM »


We had little option other than to have the Aruban dive division recover the samples and bring them back under their care.  Remember we are Americans working in Aruban waters, subject to their laws, invitation, and blessing.  Our hands are tied for the most part. I personally was extremely uncomfortable with the chain of custody, being that we weren't a part of it, but I was powerless to do anything about it.   The samples were photographed in detail by one Aruban diver and the other two investigated the contents of the trap, the dimensions, the rigging, and what surrounded the trap.  From the video, it looked like they did a diligent and careful job with the samples and the underwater photography.  I don't know who has these pictures, but I must assume ALE.

http://scaredmonkeys.net/index.php?topic=2721.msg366857;topicseen#msg366857



KYLE KINGMAN - PRIVATE FORUM

Kyle
: The bags were removed just after the ROV got out of the way when the divers took the samples to their boat.... and took off


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #788 12/31/08 -
Post by: Blue Moon on January 01, 2009, 03:10:48 PM
Thanks Kermit.  So there is proof of the divers removing Whatever was in the cage.  Time for some action on the U.S. government's part to put this out in the international community.

I am guessing these pictures of the divers recovering the contents of the cage were taken the day Paulus and Anita stood on shore and watched the ship.  An ugly picture has been painted here and it is very disturbing what unfolded on that trip by the ship and it's crew.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #788 12/31/08 -
Post by: Blue Moon on January 01, 2009, 03:11:51 PM
I want to add one more thing to my above post:  IF this was remains in the cage.   This puts us back to the MAIN question:  If these were remains in the cage WERE they Natalee's remains?  If it is Natalee's remains THEN the Persistence's aided and abetted the Aruban government to cover it up.  Not the results Natalee's family were looking for and were promised by John Silvetti.  (JMO)   ::MonkeyNoNo::

Would this make them "American Traitors"

Yes in my opinion it does.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #788 12/31/08 -
Post by: Keepthefaith on January 01, 2009, 03:11:56 PM
ldstlou wrote:
Tim Miller wasn't removed from anywhere...are you kidding me? You really think he would allow himself to be removed? He was following up a lead in Nicaragua.
------------------


I'm sorry to say - yes he was.  Along with Dateline.

Dec 30th, Kyle and Tim Miller discussed this issue in detail, but they didn't know how to handle it.  Then Kyle took a nap.  When he got up, Tim and Dateline had been ejected from the boat.

ldstlou, I don't know what fairy tales Kyle and others are now telling you, but Kyle's posts (with IP, date and time) are in their original form from when he posted them.  This item was discussed over several posts.

The Nicarauga thing didn't happen for a few more days after that, IIRC.



Exactly, Jen.  IIRC, Kyle stated that Dec 30th was "crushing" - that Tim Miller and Dateline were REMOVED from the boat.



At who's request would they have been removed from the ship?  By Mos or John Silvetti?  They is all unreal that this could have happened.  Kyle specifically asked us what we thought they should do IF they found Natalee's remains and it was a resounding "Take her remains and leave and bring her home to her family". 

This may have already been answered, just trying to catch up here.

Tim Miller was removed by John Silvetti himself on December 30th.

And it was actually private eye who posed the question about if remains were found - on December 30th

Thanks Jen.  So who was in charge on this ship, John Silvetti or Schaffer?  Who was calling the shots with the Arubans?

John Silvetti was project manager and according to Kyle it was John who talked to the Arubans including Hans Mos.


So was Kyle on board Jan. 7th and did he not attempt to take any pictures of the divers removing the contents of the cage or was he off the ship?

Kyle was on board and so was John Silvetti. According to Kyle, the ROV unit was filming the Aruban divers as they retried the evidence from the cage and they dove from their boat and returned to their boat.




KYLE KINGMAN - SCARED MONKEY FORUM

oceanexploration
Re: Natalee Case Discussion #744 3/19 -
« Reply #201 on: March 19, 2008, 08:21:47 PM »


We had little option other than to have the Aruban dive division recover the samples and bring them back under their care.  Remember we are Americans working in Aruban waters, subject to their laws, invitation, and blessing.  Our hands are tied for the most part. I personally was extremely uncomfortable with the chain of custody, being that we weren't a part of it, but I was powerless to do anything about it.   The samples were photographed in detail by one Aruban diver and the other two investigated the contents of the trap, the dimensions, the rigging, and what surrounded the trap.  From the video, it looked like they did a diligent and careful job with the samples and the underwater photography.  I don't know who has these pictures, but I must assume ALE.

http://scaredmonkeys.net/index.php?topic=2721.msg366857;topicseen#msg366857



KYLE KINGMAN - PRIVATE FORUM

Kyle
: The bags were removed just after the ROV got out of the way when the divers took the samples to their boat.... and took off

Thats's the first question to ALE.Where are the pictures?Ale will say it's not Natalee.How will we know??We won't because they were allowed to retrieve the contents and disappear.. ::MonkeyConfused::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #788 12/31/08 -
Post by: SS on January 01, 2009, 03:12:23 PM
Kermit - I have spent hours thinking and now, as usual, I have a lot of questions.  Would you please tell us more about the pond and why you think the sneaker and some human remains have been put there.  Do you know who drained the pond in March - was it ALE , Jossy, Ecotech, Silvetti, or nobody?  We were told that 40 - 50 Dutch forensic experts searched the dry pond and the surrounding neighborhood at night under the lights.  Last night the Freebirds were saying that this didn't happen.  If the pond story isn't true, then the pond witness isn't true.  Is the Matty Apt. story true? 


#674 on: Today at 10:40:21 AM   SS
Kermit - I have spent hours thinking and now, as usual, I have a lot of questions.  Would you please tell us more about the pond and why you think the sneaker and some human remains have been put there.  Do you know who drained the pond in March - was it ALE , Jossy, Ecotech, Silvetti, or nobody?  We were told that 40 - 50 Dutch forensic experts searched the dry pond and the surrounding neighborhood at night under the lights.  Last night the Freebirds were saying that this didn't happen.  If the pond story isn't true, then the pond witness isn't true.  Is the Matty Apt. story true?
http://scaredmonkeys.net/index.php?topic=4328.msg607178#msg607178

 
#926 on: December 03, 2008, 12:03:25 AM   SS
Speaking of Imelda's shoes brings a question to mind about Urine's shoes.  The pond witness saw him walking without one shoe.  Did he specify if Urine was missing a right shoe or a left shoe?  Supposedly there was a bloody shoe in Urine's closet that Paulass could have disposed of several days later.  Can we determine if it's a right shoe or a left shoe in the cage?  This could possibly clear up all of these shoes, especially since there are reports that one of Urine's shoes was also found in Monserat pond.
http://scaredmonkeys.net/index.php?topic=4182.msg564821#msg564821

ACCORDING TO CAPS
March 8, 2008 CAPS POSTED - "I hope tomorrow we will have the final links into a final resolution about the pond. This coming week is THE DAY.
Me and J & W and the C's are all in agreement now that it must be there.
scaredmonkeys.net/index.php?topic=2680.560

FEB 28th - CAPS posts at SM that he is going to go there at 9:00 The sneaker is there

Nov. 20, 2008 -
 VAN SUSTEREN: All right. Did the -- did -- was there ever any follow-up to see whether or not your witness had information that was truly helpful? Did Hans Mos, even though he didn't believe him -- did he at least assign someone to go out and investigate and look at that pond area?

HOLLOWAY: No, he didn't. You know, we had asked him to. And in fact, we had planned to go excavate the pond ourselves, and these hurricanes came through and one came close to Aruba and filled the pond back up with water. It's still our plan to go back. I think Hans Mos and I discussed, you know, Natalee's not in the pond, but we believe that, you know, he could possibly find a tennis shoe, maybe her driver's license or even some of Natalee's clothing, which would help lead into, you know, the timeline. And also, this witness implicates Paulus van der Sloot. So if that's the case, you know, that needs to be done.
http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,455069,00.html


ACCORDING TO KYLE
May 16 - Kyle posted: I think it is highly unlikely and completely inconsistent with numerous testimonies and other evidence that the pond (or anything but the ocean) contains Natalee's remains. The witness claims to have seen a muddy Joran coming out of the Monserat pond after disposing of her body.
<snip>
The 40+ investigators brought in from Holland never stepped foot in the pond


ACCORDING TO JOHN SILVETTI]b]
John Silvetti's email to Kyle: The Polis did not drain that pond and they did not search it, period!

ACCORDING TO JOSSY
#915 on: June 04, 2008, 09:42:53 PM   *******

I am confused just about one thing..Jossy said he didn't know anything about the search at Montserat Pond,except for a rumor from a witness about Joran in the area..We all saw the pictures..We all heard what OE and Caps said,,WTF? That Pond did not drain by itself and remove a top layer of soil 10-20 feet across in one section by itself. You can fool some of the people some of the time,but you cant fool us any of the time.
http://scaredmonkeys.net/index.php?topic=2879.msg387020#msg387020

ACCORDING TO HOTSHOT - source for CAPS
Hotshot posted:
CAPS knows Silvetti from me  Silvetti did do the pond and then they wouldnt let him back in after all the maps were made of the pond.
http://scaredmonkeys.net/index.php?topic=4159.msg553102#msg553102

BACK in July 11, 2006, 05:39:05 PM »
Hotshot: "I just feel those ponds that "WONT" be searched is a place that needs to be.
http://scaredmonkeys.net/index.php?topic=63.msg13147#msg13147


John did go back to work with CAPS 2 times that I know of, to Aruba, about the Monstart pond.  He was with CAPS the whole time,
http://scaredmonkeys.net/index.php?topic=4173.msg555976#msg555976











Kermit - thanks so much.  I think I am even more confused than I was before.  From what you have just showed us, the Monserat Pond wasn't searched according to Kyle and John Silvetti.  Jossy doesn't appear to have any information about the pond being searched.  If I recall, even Renfro at the time was saying that the pond was drained and searched.  I know, though, that we were told in Shango that the Dutch dogs had arrived at customs, 40-50 Dutch forensic investigators were there, the pond was drained, photographs were taken, chains were put up, and the neighborhood around the pond was also searched.  We were told that the pond was drained and searched because of specific things that Kyle had identified with the side scan sonor.  Much of this took place at night and the lights from the soccer field were left on.  We have been given hints that a sneaker and unspecified human remains were found and taken by ALE.  We were shown a photograph of areas that were examined in the pond.

Am I losing my mind or does none of this add up???? 




Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #788 12/31/08 -
Post by: Tamikosmom on January 01, 2009, 03:13:21 PM
Any thoughts from you CapsLockwizard??

 ::MonkeyShocked::

Keepthefaith

Your are baaaaad ... soooo baaaaad.

 ::MonkeyHaHa::

Hey ... hubby, I and friends brought the New Year's in watching the countdown taking place at the Seattle Space Needle on TV.  You came to mind my friend.

Janet


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #788 12/31/08 -
Post by: Patriot on January 01, 2009, 03:14:05 PM
ldstlou wrote:
Tim Miller wasn't removed from anywhere...are you kidding me? You really think he would allow himself to be removed? He was following up a lead in Nicaragua.
------------------


I'm sorry to say - yes he was.  Along with Dateline.

Dec 30th, Kyle and Tim Miller discussed this issue in detail, but they didn't know how to handle it.  Then Kyle took a nap.  When he got up, Tim and Dateline had been ejected from the boat.

ldstlou, I don't know what fairy tales Kyle and others are now telling you, but Kyle's posts (with IP, date and time) are in their original form from when he posted them.  This item was discussed over several posts.

The Nicarauga thing didn't happen for a few more days after that, IIRC.



Exactly, Jen.  IIRC, Kyle stated that Dec 30th was "crushing" - that Tim Miller and Dateline were REMOVED from the boat.



At who's request would they have been removed from the ship?  By Mos or John Silvetti?  They is all unreal that this could have happened.  Kyle specifically asked us what we thought they should do IF they found Natalee's remains and it was a resounding "Take her remains and leave and bring her home to her family". 

This may have already been answered, just trying to catch up here.

Tim Miller was removed by John Silvetti himself on December 30th.

And it was actually private eye who posed the question about if remains were found - on December 30th

Thanks Jen.  So who was in charge on this ship, John Silvetti or Schaffer?  Who was calling the shots with the Arubans?

John Silvetti was project manager and according to Kyle it was John who talked to the Arubans including Hans Mos.


So was Kyle on board Jan. 7th and did he not attempt to take any pictures of the divers removing the contents of the cage or was he off the ship?

Kyle was on board and so was John Silvetti. According to Kyle, the ROV unit was filming the Aruban divers as they retried the evidence from the cage and they dove from their boat and returned to their boat.



And the pictures of these-Is the FBI and family in possession of these pictures from the ROV?  OR is that the pictures you posted here? 

Yes those are in possession of the family and fbi and john q. kelly.


I stand with the Frog...

With that said, if Silvetti is part of the coverup, why would he allow the the ROV to record the recovery of the evidence? He must of known the ROV was recording the whole thing right? Why take the risk of the tape getting leaked?


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #788 12/31/08 -
Post by: Magnolia on January 01, 2009, 03:14:21 PM
Well Monkeys ... it is snowing again but ... hubby and I will attempt another treck into the big city.  New Years Day is the time for celebrating in the Japanese tradition so ... a family reunion of sorts on hubby's side of the family is where it is at for those who can make it.  My daughter and family are driving into Vancouver for the party from the Eastern Fraser Valley but ... both sons, DILs and grandson will be a no show ... other plans with inlaws.  I hate sharing.

 ::MonkeyWaa::

Tomorrow after getting the tree down and putting decorations away ... everything will be back to normal.

 ::cartwheel::

I love routine.

HAPPY NEW YEAR!!

Janet
11:55 AM PT

 

I hope you have a wonderful day Janet!  I'm preparing a New Year's Day Feast for the family, youngest son requested more dressing like I made for Christmas!  (Gained huge brownie points)  Baking a ham for them, and a large crow for me!   ::MonkeyWink::  

Happy New Year!

TM, no black eyed peas and cabbage?  We think here that if you
don't have those things on New Year's Day you won't have enough
money all year to keep the wolf from the door.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #788 12/31/08 -
Post by: Kermit on January 01, 2009, 03:15:43 PM
Exactly SS.

It does not add up.



Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #788 12/31/08 -
Post by: Blue Moon on January 01, 2009, 03:16:26 PM
Well Monkeys ... it is snowing again but ... hubby and I will attempt another treck into the big city.  New Years Day is the time for celebrating in the Japanese tradition so ... a family reunion of sorts on hubby's side of the family is where it is at for those who can make it.  My daughter and family are driving into Vancouver for the party from the Eastern Fraser Valley but ... both sons, DILs and grandson will be a no show ... other plans with inlaws.  I hate sharing.

 ::MonkeyWaa::

Tomorrow after getting the tree down and putting decorations away ... everything will be back to normal.

 ::cartwheel::

I love routine.

HAPPY NEW YEAR!!

Janet
11:55 AM PT

 

I hope you have a wonderful day Janet!  I'm preparing a New Year's Day Feast for the family, youngest son requested more dressing like I made for Christmas!  (Gained huge brownie points)  Baking a ham for them, and a large crow for me!   ::MonkeyWink::  

Happy New Year!

TM, no black eyed peas and cabbage?  We think here that if you
don't have those things on New Year's Day you won't have enough
money all year to keep the wolf from the door.

OH blackeyed peas--we will have that tonight along with pork chops-not frog legs.  ::MonkeyLaugh:: ::MonkeyLaugh:: ::MonkeyCool::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #788 12/31/08 -
Post by: Keepthefaith on January 01, 2009, 03:16:45 PM
Any thoughts from you CapsLockwizard??

 ::MonkeyShocked::

Keepthefaith

Your are baaaaad ... soooo baaaaad.

 ::MonkeyHaHa::

Hey ... hubby, I and friends brought the New Year's in watching the countdown taking place at the Seattle Space Needle on TV.  You came to mind my friend.

Janet

Watched them to.they were actually very good this year!the station i was watching had a male reporter that was just terrible though.I don't remember if it was KOMO4 or KING5 but he was just terrible!In terms of Caps.just curious!!

KEEPTHEFAITH


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #788 12/31/08 -
Post by: Blue Moon on January 01, 2009, 03:18:13 PM
Kermit, has Jossy inserted himself in all this innocently or on purpose?


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #788 12/31/08 -
Post by: Kermit on January 01, 2009, 03:18:22 PM
Thank you Patriot.

If I remember correctly and maybe Jen or Winger or Sharon or Angie recall better then I - Kyle said that they didn't know the ROV unit was filming. Kyle took screenshots from it and it is on his computer.




Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #788 12/31/08 -
Post by: Kermit on January 01, 2009, 03:18:58 PM
Kermit, has Jossy inserted himself in all this innocently or on purpose?

Still to be determined.



Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #788 12/31/08 -
Post by: San on January 01, 2009, 03:19:47 PM
ldstlou wrote:
Tim Miller wasn't removed from anywhere...are you kidding me? You really think he would allow himself to be removed? He was following up a lead in Nicaragua.
------------------


I'm sorry to say - yes he was.  Along with Dateline.

Dec 30th, Kyle and Tim Miller discussed this issue in detail, but they didn't know how to handle it.  Then Kyle took a nap.  When he got up, Tim and Dateline had been ejected from the boat.

ldstlou, I don't know what fairy tales Kyle and others are now telling you, but Kyle's posts (with IP, date and time) are in their original form from when he posted them.  This item was discussed over several posts.

The Nicarauga thing didn't happen for a few more days after that, IIRC.



Exactly, Jen.  IIRC, Kyle stated that Dec 30th was "crushing" - that Tim Miller and Dateline were REMOVED from the boat.



At who's request would they have been removed from the ship?  By Mos or John Silvetti?  They is all unreal that this could have happened.  Kyle specifically asked us what we thought they should do IF they found Natalee's remains and it was a resounding "Take her remains and leave and bring her home to her family". 

This may have already been answered, just trying to catch up here.

Tim Miller was removed by John Silvetti himself on December 30th.

And it was actually private eye who posed the question about if remains were found - on December 30th

Thanks Jen.  So who was in charge on this ship, John Silvetti or Schaffer?  Who was calling the shots with the Arubans?

John Silvetti was project manager and according to Kyle it was John who talked to the Arubans including Hans Mos.


So was Kyle on board Jan. 7th and did he not attempt to take any pictures of the divers removing the contents of the cage or was he off the ship?

Kyle was on board and so was John Silvetti. According to Kyle, the ROV unit was filming the Aruban divers as they retried the evidence from the cage and they dove from their boat and returned to their boat.



And the pictures of these-Is the FBI and family in possession of these pictures from the ROV?  OR is that the pictures you posted here? 

Yes those are in possession of the family and fbi and john q. kelly.


I stand with the Frog...

With that said, if Silvetti is part of the coverup, why would he allow the the ROV to record the recovery of the evidence? He must of known the ROV was recording the whole thing right? Why take the risk of the tape getting leaked?

Maybe he wanted to insure he wouldn't be doublecrossed.  Would this be called "Insurance".  So much for insurance I say.  But then again I'm a nut.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #788 12/31/08 -
Post by: Kermit on January 01, 2009, 03:19:49 PM
DON'T EAT THE OTHER WHITE MEAT


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #788 12/31/08 -
Post by: texasmom on January 01, 2009, 03:20:07 PM
Well Monkeys ... it is snowing again but ... hubby and I will attempt another treck into the big city.  New Years Day is the time for celebrating in the Japanese tradition so ... a family reunion of sorts on hubby's side of the family is where it is at for those who can make it.  My daughter and family are driving into Vancouver for the party from the Eastern Fraser Valley but ... both sons, DILs and grandson will be a no show ... other plans with inlaws.  I hate sharing.

 ::MonkeyWaa::

Tomorrow after getting the tree down and putting decorations away ... everything will be back to normal.

 ::cartwheel::

I love routine.

HAPPY NEW YEAR!!

Janet
11:55 AM PT

 

I hope you have a wonderful day Janet!  I'm preparing a New Year's Day Feast for the family, youngest son requested more dressing like I made for Christmas!  (Gained huge brownie points)  Baking a ham for them, and a large crow for me!   ::MonkeyWink::  

Happy New Year!

TM, no black eyed peas and cabbage?  We think here that if you
don't have those things on New Year's Day you won't have enough
money all year to keep the wolf from the door.

Magnolia,
I just didn't list all the sides....black eyed peas, corn casserole, boiled cabbage, rolls & cornbread; and cherry/pineapple delight or chocolate pie for dessert.  I would never dare not have my black eyed peas for New Year's Day, and I cook the cabbage too but I'm the only one that will eat it!


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #788 12/31/08 -
Post by: Keepthefaith on January 01, 2009, 03:22:16 PM
Kermit, has Jossy inserted himself in all this innocently or on purpose?

Still to be determined.



You still have a fighting chance Janet! ::MonkeyDance:: I'm still open on Jossy as well but can get over how someone in his family doesn't know exactly what happen.JMOO.Jossy or a family memeber could have givin the scenario up a long time ago "IF" they know what happen!I to hope Jossy is a good guy but i'm not leaning that way... ::MonkeyCool::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #788 12/31/08 -
Post by: hotping on January 01, 2009, 03:24:23 PM
Thank you Patriot.

If I remember correctly and maybe Jen or Winger or Sharon or Angie recall better then I - Kyle said that they didn't know the ROV unit was filming. Kyle took screenshots from it and it is on his computer.



I wonder if Silvetti knew that the ROV was filming the recovery of the trap contents?  ::MonkeyEek::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #788 12/31/08 -
Post by: San on January 01, 2009, 03:24:44 PM
Well Monkeys ... it is snowing again but ... hubby and I will attempt another treck into the big city.  New Years Day is the time for celebrating in the Japanese tradition so ... a family reunion of sorts on hubby's side of the family is where it is at for those who can make it.  My daughter and family are driving into Vancouver for the party from the Eastern Fraser Valley but ... both sons, DILs and grandson will be a no show ... other plans with inlaws.  I hate sharing.

 ::MonkeyWaa::

Tomorrow after getting the tree down and putting decorations away ... everything will be back to normal.

 ::cartwheel::

I love routine.

HAPPY NEW YEAR!!

Janet
11:55 AM PT

 

I hope you have a wonderful day Janet!  I'm preparing a New Year's Day Feast for the family, youngest son requested more dressing like I made for Christmas!  (Gained huge brownie points)  Baking a ham for them, and a large crow for me!   ::MonkeyWink::  

Happy New Year!

TM, no black eyed peas and cabbage?  We think here that if you
don't have those things on New Year's Day you won't have enough
money all year to keep the wolf from the door.

Magnolia,
I just didn't list all the sides....black eyed peas, corn casserole, boiled cabbage, rolls & cornbread; and cherry/pineapple delight or chocolate pie for dessert.  I would never dare not have my black eyed peas for New Year's Day, and I cook the cabbage too but I'm the only one that will eat it!

Yum....New Years Day isn't a big day in our household.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #788 12/31/08 -
Post by: Magnolia on January 01, 2009, 03:27:48 PM
Well Monkeys ... it is snowing again but ... hubby and I will attempt another treck into the big city.  New Years Day is the time for celebrating in the Japanese tradition so ... a family reunion of sorts on hubby's side of the family is where it is at for those who can make it.  My daughter and family are driving into Vancouver for the party from the Eastern Fraser Valley but ... both sons, DILs and grandson will be a no show ... other plans with inlaws.  I hate sharing.

 ::MonkeyWaa::

Tomorrow after getting the tree down and putting decorations away ... everything will be back to normal.

 ::cartwheel::

I love routine.

HAPPY NEW YEAR!!

Janet
11:55 AM PT

 

I hope you have a wonderful day Janet!  I'm preparing a New Year's Day Feast for the family, youngest son requested more dressing like I made for Christmas!  (Gained huge brownie points)  Baking a ham for them, and a large crow for me!   ::MonkeyWink::  

Happy New Year!

TM, no black eyed peas and cabbage?  We think here that if you
don't have those things on New Year's Day you won't have enough
money all year to keep the wolf from the door.

Magnolia,
I just didn't list all the sides....black eyed peas, corn casserole, boiled cabbage, rolls & cornbread; and cherry/pineapple delight or chocolate pie for dessert.  I would never dare not have my black eyed peas for New Year's Day, and I cook the cabbage too but I'm the only one that will eat it!

I am so glad, TM.  I didn't want you to be penniless all year.
I was worried. ::MonkeyWink::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #788 12/31/08 -
Post by: SS on January 01, 2009, 03:33:49 PM
Kermit - I have spent hours thinking and now, as usual, I have a lot of questions.  Would you please tell us more about the pond and why you think the sneaker and some human remains have been put there.  Do you know who drained the pond in March - was it ALE , Jossy, Ecotech, Silvetti, or nobody?  We were told that 40 - 50 Dutch forensic experts searched the dry pond and the surrounding neighborhood at night under the lights.  Last night the Freebirds were saying that this didn't happen.  If the pond story isn't true, then the pond witness isn't true.  Is the Matty Apt. story true? 


#674 on: Today at 10:40:21 AM   SS
Kermit - I have spent hours thinking and now, as usual, I have a lot of questions.  Would you please tell us more about the pond and why you think the sneaker and some human remains have been put there.  Do you know who drained the pond in March - was it ALE , Jossy, Ecotech, Silvetti, or nobody?  We were told that 40 - 50 Dutch forensic experts searched the dry pond and the surrounding neighborhood at night under the lights.  Last night the Freebirds were saying that this didn't happen.  If the pond story isn't true, then the pond witness isn't true.  Is the Matty Apt. story true?
http://scaredmonkeys.net/index.php?topic=4328.msg607178#msg607178

 
#926 on: December 03, 2008, 12:03:25 AM   SS
Speaking of Imelda's shoes brings a question to mind about Urine's shoes.  The pond witness saw him walking without one shoe.  Did he specify if Urine was missing a right shoe or a left shoe?  Supposedly there was a bloody shoe in Urine's closet that Paulass could have disposed of several days later.  Can we determine if it's a right shoe or a left shoe in the cage?  This could possibly clear up all of these shoes, especially since there are reports that one of Urine's shoes was also found in Monserat pond.
http://scaredmonkeys.net/index.php?topic=4182.msg564821#msg564821

ACCORDING TO CAPS
March 8, 2008 CAPS POSTED - "I hope tomorrow we will have the final links into a final resolution about the pond. This coming week is THE DAY.
Me and J & W and the C's are all in agreement now that it must be there.
scaredmonkeys.net/index.php?topic=2680.560

FEB 28th - CAPS posts at SM that he is going to go there at 9:00 The sneaker is there

Nov. 20, 2008 -
 VAN SUSTEREN: All right. Did the -- did -- was there ever any follow-up to see whether or not your witness had information that was truly helpful? Did Hans Mos, even though he didn't believe him -- did he at least assign someone to go out and investigate and look at that pond area?

HOLLOWAY: No, he didn't. You know, we had asked him to. And in fact, we had planned to go excavate the pond ourselves, and these hurricanes came through and one came close to Aruba and filled the pond back up with water. It's still our plan to go back. I think Hans Mos and I discussed, you know, Natalee's not in the pond, but we believe that, you know, he could possibly find a tennis shoe, maybe her driver's license or even some of Natalee's clothing, which would help lead into, you know, the timeline. And also, this witness implicates Paulus van der Sloot. So if that's the case, you know, that needs to be done.
http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,455069,00.html


ACCORDING TO KYLE
May 16 - Kyle posted: I think it is highly unlikely and completely inconsistent with numerous testimonies and other evidence that the pond (or anything but the ocean) contains Natalee's remains. The witness claims to have seen a muddy Joran coming out of the Monserat pond after disposing of her body.
<snip>
The 40+ investigators brought in from Holland never stepped foot in the pond


ACCORDING TO JOHN SILVETTI]b]
John Silvetti's email to Kyle: The Polis did not drain that pond and they did not search it, period!

ACCORDING TO JOSSY
#915 on: June 04, 2008, 09:42:53 PM   *******

I am confused just about one thing..Jossy said he didn't know anything about the search at Montserat Pond,except for a rumor from a witness about Joran in the area..We all saw the pictures..We all heard what OE and Caps said,,WTF? That Pond did not drain by itself and remove a top layer of soil 10-20 feet across in one section by itself. You can fool some of the people some of the time,but you cant fool us any of the time.
http://scaredmonkeys.net/index.php?topic=2879.msg387020#msg387020

ACCORDING TO HOTSHOT - source for CAPS
Hotshot posted:
CAPS knows Silvetti from me  Silvetti did do the pond and then they wouldnt let him back in after all the maps were made of the pond.
http://scaredmonkeys.net/index.php?topic=4159.msg553102#msg553102

BACK in July 11, 2006, 05:39:05 PM »
Hotshot: "I just feel those ponds that "WONT" be searched is a place that needs to be.
http://scaredmonkeys.net/index.php?topic=63.msg13147#msg13147


John did go back to work with CAPS 2 times that I know of, to Aruba, about the Monstart pond.  He was with CAPS the whole time,
http://scaredmonkeys.net/index.php?topic=4173.msg555976#msg555976











Kermit - thanks so much.  I think I am even more confused than I was before.  From what you have just showed us, the Monserat Pond wasn't searched according to Kyle and John Silvetti.  Jossy doesn't appear to have any information about the pond being searched.  If I recall, even Renfro at the time was saying that the pond was drained and searched.   I know, though, that we were told in Shango that the Dutch dogs had arrived at customs, 40-50 Dutch forensic investigators were there, the pond was drained, photographs were taken, chains were put up, and the neighborhood around the pond was also searched.  We were told that the pond was drained and searched because of specific things that Kyle had identified with the side scan sonor.  Much of this took place at night and the lights from the soccer field were left on.  We have been given hints that a sneaker and unspecified human remains were found and taken by ALE.  We were shown a photograph of areas that were examined in the pond.

Am I losing my mind or does none of this add up???? 





I'm sorry, I have to edit what Renfro said.  I believe she was saying on RU that the pond was NOT drained and searched.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #788 12/31/08 -
Post by: Edward on January 01, 2009, 03:34:33 PM
Kermit, has Jossy inserted himself in all this innocently or on purpose?

Still to be determined.



from day 1 ? ..on purpose.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #788 12/31/08 -
Post by: texasmom on January 01, 2009, 03:35:35 PM
Thanks for your concern Magnolia, hopefully I'm covering those bases; if it happens it won't be because I didn't have my black eyed peas and cabbage!

 ::MonkeyHaHa::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #788 12/31/08 -
Post by: Patriot on January 01, 2009, 03:35:44 PM
Thank you Patriot.

If I remember correctly and maybe Jen or Winger or Sharon or Angie recall better then I - Kyle said that they didn't know the ROV unit was filming. Kyle took screenshots from it and it is on his computer.



I wonder if Silvetti knew that the ROV was filming the recovery of the trap contents?  ::MonkeyEek::

Maybe he was a double agent? Expose the coverup, bring closure to the family, and make millions selling the tape all at the same time?



Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #788 12/31/08 -
Post by: Patriot on January 01, 2009, 03:40:36 PM
Thank you Patriot.

If I remember correctly and maybe Jen or Winger or Sharon or Angie recall better then I - Kyle said that they didn't know the ROV unit was filming. Kyle took screenshots from it and it is on his computer.



I wonder if Silvetti knew that the ROV was filming the recovery of the trap contents?  ::MonkeyEek::

I can't believe I'm tying to defend the Persistence. ::MonkeyConfused::

I just want to believe so bad that this was for NH and not something else.

Maybe he was a double agent? Expose the coverup, bring closure to the family, and make millions selling the tape all at the same time?




Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #788 12/31/08 -
Post by: Lifesong on January 01, 2009, 03:41:02 PM


Kermit - thanks so much.  I think I am even more confused than I was before.  From what you have just showed us, the Monserat Pond wasn't searched according to Kyle and John Silvetti.  Jossy doesn't appear to have any information about the pond being searched.  If I recall, even Renfro at the time was saying that the pond was drained and searched.  I know, though, that we were told in Shango that the Dutch dogs had arrived at customs, 40-50 Dutch forensic investigators were there, the pond was drained, photographs were taken, chains were put up, and the neighborhood around the pond was also searched.  We were told that the pond was drained and searched because of specific things that Kyle had identified with the side scan sonor.  Much of this took place at night and the lights from the soccer field were left on.  We have been given hints that a sneaker and unspecified human remains were found and taken by ALE.  We were shown a photograph of areas that were examined in the pond.

Am I losing my mind or does none of this add up???? 



IMHO, believing that requires pre-assuming that ALE & the Dutch are interested in solving, or at least investigating, this case.   ::MonkeyNoNo::

That's just not the ALE/Dutch involvement that I'm familiar with.   ::MonkeyNoNo::

SS, I think your math skills are accurate,  ::MonkeyHaHa::  and you are *not* losing your mind! 



Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #788 12/31/08 -
Post by: Kermit on January 01, 2009, 03:41:59 PM
Kermit - I have spent hours thinking and now, as usual, I have a lot of questions.  Would you please tell us more about the pond and why you think the sneaker and some human remains have been put there.  Do you know who drained the pond in March - was it ALE , Jossy, Ecotech, Silvetti, or nobody?  We were told that 40 - 50 Dutch forensic experts searched the dry pond and the surrounding neighborhood at night under the lights.  Last night the Freebirds were saying that this didn't happen.  If the pond story isn't true, then the pond witness isn't true.  Is the Matty Apt. story true? 


#674 on: Today at 10:40:21 AM   SS
Kermit - I have spent hours thinking and now, as usual, I have a lot of questions.  Would you please tell us more about the pond and why you think the sneaker and some human remains have been put there.  Do you know who drained the pond in March - was it ALE , Jossy, Ecotech, Silvetti, or nobody?  We were told that 40 - 50 Dutch forensic experts searched the dry pond and the surrounding neighborhood at night under the lights.  Last night the Freebirds were saying that this didn't happen.  If the pond story isn't true, then the pond witness isn't true.  Is the Matty Apt. story true?
http://scaredmonkeys.net/index.php?topic=4328.msg607178#msg607178

 
#926 on: December 03, 2008, 12:03:25 AM   SS
Speaking of Imelda's shoes brings a question to mind about Urine's shoes.  The pond witness saw him walking without one shoe.  Did he specify if Urine was missing a right shoe or a left shoe?  Supposedly there was a bloody shoe in Urine's closet that Paulass could have disposed of several days later.  Can we determine if it's a right shoe or a left shoe in the cage?  This could possibly clear up all of these shoes, especially since there are reports that one of Urine's shoes was also found in Monserat pond.
http://scaredmonkeys.net/index.php?topic=4182.msg564821#msg564821

ACCORDING TO CAPS
March 8, 2008 CAPS POSTED - "I hope tomorrow we will have the final links into a final resolution about the pond. This coming week is THE DAY.
Me and J & W and the C's are all in agreement now that it must be there.
scaredmonkeys.net/index.php?topic=2680.560

FEB 28th - CAPS posts at SM that he is going to go there at 9:00 The sneaker is there

Nov. 20, 2008 -
 VAN SUSTEREN: All right. Did the -- did -- was there ever any follow-up to see whether or not your witness had information that was truly helpful? Did Hans Mos, even though he didn't believe him -- did he at least assign someone to go out and investigate and look at that pond area?

HOLLOWAY: No, he didn't. You know, we had asked him to. And in fact, we had planned to go excavate the pond ourselves, and these hurricanes came through and one came close to Aruba and filled the pond back up with water. It's still our plan to go back. I think Hans Mos and I discussed, you know, Natalee's not in the pond, but we believe that, you know, he could possibly find a tennis shoe, maybe her driver's license or even some of Natalee's clothing, which would help lead into, you know, the timeline. And also, this witness implicates Paulus van der Sloot. So if that's the case, you know, that needs to be done.
http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,455069,00.html


ACCORDING TO KYLE
May 16 - Kyle posted: I think it is highly unlikely and completely inconsistent with numerous testimonies and other evidence that the pond (or anything but the ocean) contains Natalee's remains. The witness claims to have seen a muddy Joran coming out of the Monserat pond after disposing of her body.
<snip>
The 40+ investigators brought in from Holland never stepped foot in the pond


ACCORDING TO JOHN SILVETTI]b]
John Silvetti's email to Kyle: The Polis did not drain that pond and they did not search it, period!

ACCORDING TO JOSSY
#915 on: June 04, 2008, 09:42:53 PM   *******

I am confused just about one thing..Jossy said he didn't know anything about the search at Montserat Pond,except for a rumor from a witness about Joran in the area..We all saw the pictures..We all heard what OE and Caps said,,WTF? That Pond did not drain by itself and remove a top layer of soil 10-20 feet across in one section by itself. You can fool some of the people some of the time,but you cant fool us any of the time.
http://scaredmonkeys.net/index.php?topic=2879.msg387020#msg387020

ACCORDING TO HOTSHOT - source for CAPS
Hotshot posted:
CAPS knows Silvetti from me  Silvetti did do the pond and then they wouldnt let him back in after all the maps were made of the pond.
http://scaredmonkeys.net/index.php?topic=4159.msg553102#msg553102

BACK in July 11, 2006, 05:39:05 PM »
Hotshot: "I just feel those ponds that "WONT" be searched is a place that needs to be.
http://scaredmonkeys.net/index.php?topic=63.msg13147#msg13147


John did go back to work with CAPS 2 times that I know of, to Aruba, about the Monstart pond.  He was with CAPS the whole time,
http://scaredmonkeys.net/index.php?topic=4173.msg555976#msg555976











Kermit - thanks so much.  I think I am even more confused than I was before.  From what you have just showed us, the Monserat Pond wasn't searched according to Kyle and John Silvetti.  Jossy doesn't appear to have any information about the pond being searched.  If I recall, even Renfro at the time was saying that the pond was drained and searched.   I know, though, that we were told in Shango that the Dutch dogs had arrived at customs, 40-50 Dutch forensic investigators were there, the pond was drained, photographs were taken, chains were put up, and the neighborhood around the pond was also searched.  We were told that the pond was drained and searched because of specific things that Kyle had identified with the side scan sonor.  Much of this took place at night and the lights from the soccer field were left on.  We have been given hints that a sneaker and unspecified human remains were found and taken by ALE.  We were shown a photograph of areas that were examined in the pond.

Am I losing my mind or does none of this add up???? 





I'm sorry, I have to edit what Renfro said.  I believe she was saying on RU that the pond was NOT drained and searched.

Here is CAPS take on it
8. OM give instruction to clean up the Pond but, the Santarosa group did not clean it up, since the ground was still muddy and it was posponed but then the rain came and is now full to the brim. Got new pictures.
9. the pond is now offlimited by a chain across the drive way entrance.

10. spoke to Selvetty and asked a lot of question...
http://scaredmonkeys.net/index.php?topic=4182.msg564838#msg564838


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #788 12/31/08 -
Post by: Patriot on January 01, 2009, 03:42:30 PM
Thank you Patriot.

If I remember correctly and maybe Jen or Winger or Sharon or Angie recall better then I - Kyle said that they didn't know the ROV unit was filming. Kyle took screenshots from it and it is on his computer.



I wonder if Silvetti knew that the ROV was filming the recovery of the trap contents?  ::MonkeyEek::

I can't believe I'm tying to defend the Persistence. ::MonkeyConfused::

I just want to believe so bad that this was for NH and not something else.

Maybe he was a double agent? Expose the coverup, bring closure to the family, and make millions selling the tape all at the same time?



Sorry, messed up the quote... Back to lurking.

I can't believe I'm tying to defend the Persistence.

I just want to believe so bad that this was for NH and not something else.




Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #788 12/31/08 -
Post by: Kermit on January 01, 2009, 03:43:46 PM
Kyle to RED at SM:
I am the one who made those screen captures from live ROV footage.
You foolishly thought they were taken from the footage on Dateline!

http://scaredmonkeys.net/index.php?topic=2660.msg357379#msg357379


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #788 12/31/08 -
Post by: Kermit on January 01, 2009, 03:44:25 PM

From Kyle: THis is what I'm trying to figure out now. I need to know the leak! I believe Caps is only one step away from DirtyHand


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #788 12/31/08 -
Post by: Tamikosmom on January 01, 2009, 03:44:51 PM

Kermit - thanks so much.  I think I am even more confused than I was before.  From what you have just showed us, the Monserat Pond wasn't searched according to Kyle and John Silvetti.  Jossy doesn't appear to have any information about the pond being searched.   If I recall, even Renfro at the time was saying that the pond was drained and searched.  I know, though, that we were told in Shango that the Dutch dogs had arrived at customs, 40-50 Dutch forensic investigators were there, the pond was drained, photographs were taken, chains were put up, and the neighborhood around the pond was also searched.  We were told that the pond was drained and searched because of specific things that Kyle had identified with the side scan sonor.  Much of this took place at night and the lights from the soccer field were left on.  We have been given hints that a sneaker and unspecified human remains were found and taken by ALE.  We were shown a photograph of areas that were examined in the pond.

Am I losing my mind or does none of this add up???? 



SS ... I could not comprehend why there was no media attention encompassing Monserat Pond search.

As I have said when CAPS submitted his initial posts ... it is my contention that CAPS placed himself on the SM forum or ... was placed by higher ups to distract from the Persistence undertaking ... an undertaking that had discovered a cage/trap on the ocean floor that could hold the remains of Natalee Holloway.

At this period in time ... I do believe that Jossy was in the dark regarding any wrongdoing encompassing the Persistence undertaking.  At this point in time there had not been a connection with CAPS and John Silvetti..

Also ... I do not believe at this period of time that Kyle was an active participatant in regards to any wrongdoing ... just a concerned *******.

Apparently Kyle Kingman's intentions were to report to the family/FBI his suspicions regarding the happening encompassing the Persistence undertaking when he returned from Aruba.  However ... there appears there was a change of heart and ... self-serving interests was where it was at.

Janet

++++++

KYLE KINGMAN - PRIVATE FORUM

Kyle: I did not feel the same and we had a major difference in opinion. He [John Silvetti] was the one who never pressed ALE to be completely open with us with the trap evidence. I would have forced them to. However, John was the one paying my invoices so I was forced to sit back and hope for the best.



Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #788 12/31/08 -
Post by: Kermit on January 01, 2009, 03:44:59 PM
From Kyle: We're close to finding the Dirty Hand and a major leak plaguing the investigation. I believe they're linked. I'm assuming Caps isn't deep inside ALE, but do we know that he isn't? We need to figure out who Cap's source is and what he does.
Can we confirm Destiny's source is a Dairio reporter? If so, do we know who this would be? Could it be Eduardo Mansur???


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #788 12/31/08 -
Post by: Kermit on January 01, 2009, 03:45:24 PM
Kyle stated: "The bags were deliberately placed there after the divers sampled the contents. The bags were removed just after the ROV got out of the way when the divers took the samples to their boat.... and took off. "


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #788 12/31/08 -
Post by: Kermit on January 01, 2009, 03:46:11 PM
Kyle stated: "The Persistence had no divers on the 7th. Tim Trahan was our diver on the 30th-Dec, but he was out of the country at the time. The Aruban divers were on the police boat, dove from their boat, and returned to their boat.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #788 12/31/08 -
Post by: Kermit on January 01, 2009, 03:47:28 PM
Kyle stated: "The fabric(s?) are not visible on either the Dec 29th or 30th dives. There is about an inch of sand over the fabrics. The fabrics are completely covered. The diver sampled the sand and found the fabric underneath the sand. He then bagged the blue fabric. If the other bag contains fabric, it was also in the sand. There was also something possibly recovered from far inside the trap. In the video the diver is inside the trap with just below his knees showing. I don't know what was sampled far inside the trap if anything."


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #788 12/31/08 -
Post by: Keepthefaith on January 01, 2009, 03:47:40 PM
From Kyle: We're close to finding the Dirty Hand and a major leak plaguing the investigation. I believe they're linked. I'm assuming Caps isn't deep inside ALE, but do we know that he isn't? We need to figure out who Cap's source is and what he does.
Can we confirm Destiny's source is a Dairio reporter? If so, do we know who this would be? Could it be Eduardo Mansur???

Caps.Eduardo Mansur?Kermit?


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #788 12/31/08 -
Post by: Kermit on January 01, 2009, 03:48:33 PM
Dave Holloway: I got a phone call from Tim.

Chris Hansen: And what'd he say?

Dave Holloway: He told me, he said, "Dave, we found her."

Chris Hansen: "We found her?"

Dave Holloway: Yeah. I said, "Are you sure?" and he said, "I’m 99.9 percent sure." He said, "We hadn't gone down and dove under or anything. But the photographs--" he said, "I tell you, Dave." I-- he said, "That's what we're looking for. And that's gotta-- that-- that's it."


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #788 12/31/08 -
Post by: Nut44x4 on January 01, 2009, 03:49:04 PM
OH blackeyed peas--we will have that tonight along with pork chops-not frog legs.  ::MonkeyLaugh:: ::MonkeyLaugh:: ::MonkeyCool::
 

O/T We had that today...they sucked. My sister made them.  ::MonkeyNoNo:: I used to love them.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #788 12/31/08 -
Post by: Patriot on January 01, 2009, 03:49:29 PM
Kyle to RED at SM:
I am the one who made those screen captures from live ROV footage.
You foolishly thought they were taken from the footage on Dateline!

http://scaredmonkeys.net/index.php?topic=2660.msg357379#msg357379


Just so I'm clear. Is this quote in response to the zip lock bag photos or the original cage photos?


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #788 12/31/08 -
Post by: Kermit on January 01, 2009, 03:49:29 PM
Quote from: casa on December 05, 2008, 10:57:59 PM
Be careful what you believe.Others who speak for the family are not so truthful
http://scaredmonkeys.net/index.php?topic=4209.600


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #788 12/31/08 -
Post by: Nut44x4 on January 01, 2009, 03:49:59 PM
that looks like the handle to the bucket..... no?


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #788 12/31/08 -
Post by: Tamikosmom on January 01, 2009, 03:51:12 PM
Kyle to RED at SM:
I am the one who made those screen captures from live ROV footage.
You foolishly thought they were taken from the footage on Dateline!

http://scaredmonkeys.net/index.php?topic=2660.msg357379#msg357379

 ::MonkeyShocked::

How arrogant!!!

Janet


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #788 12/31/08 -
Post by: Kermit on January 01, 2009, 03:51:33 PM
Kyle to RED at SM:
I am the one who made those screen captures from live ROV footage.
You foolishly thought they were taken from the footage on Dateline!

http://scaredmonkeys.net/index.php?topic=2660.msg357379#msg357379


Just so I'm clear. Is this quote in response to the zip lock bag photos or the original cage photos?

Kyle was upset at Red because he thought Red had done something to get ahold of the photos that Robin Holloway had posted on another website. So, Kyle is talking about those photos which Kyle had been asked by Dave Holloway for, but Kyle did not give them to him. Dave received those photos from the FBI.

oceanexploration
Scared Monkey
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 224



View Profile
   
   
Re: Natalee Case Discussion #736 2/27 -
« on: February 29, 2008, 09:27:19 AM »
   
Red,

Let me make myself perfectly clear.  Your bitterness towards me is neither my fault nor my concern.  If what you said is true and Tim Miller said something making you feel entitled to be on board this boat at some point, he was mistaken.  It was not his decision, nor mine.  He is not the project manager.  Don't take your frustrations out on me or retaliate against us or turn people against us because of your hurt feelings.  This was not personal which you're making it.

I have never made accusations towards you or SM.  I have been a strong supporter of SM since the beginning of this search.  Otherwise I wouldn't have put a link from our Blog.
The email I sent you was in confidence (which you violated) which simply asked where the pics came from and how they came to SM, where I first saw them posted.
You say how dare me?   How DARE YOU for questioning me and demand appology about those pics when you were mistaken.  I am the one who made those screen captures from live ROV footage. You foolishly thought they were taken from the footage on Dateline! Who are you to question us about our work?  Who are you to compare your search efforts to ours as if it were a contest of "who loves Natalee more"?  Newsflash: We are working on the same side, to bring justice.  Do you think we don't respect SM and your efforts since the beginning?  How wrong you are and how arrogant!

My apologies to all Monkeys.  You all know I love and respect all that you've done since the beginning, despite what Red would like you to think from his emotional rants.  It is probable that this search would not have happened if SM hasn't pushed the issues since the beginning.  I'm sorry for Red and his arrogance.  He's stepped on my toes for the last time.
« Last Edit: February 29, 2008, 09:43:58 AM by klaasend »


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #788 12/31/08 -
Post by: Kermit on January 01, 2009, 03:55:35 PM
Quote from: klaasend on February 26, 2008, 09:11:45 PM
I posted all 6 pictures on page 25 but I can see how Tim Miller would think he might have found something looking at this pic:
Even in the other picture it looked like a body in the fetal position.
(http://i118.photobucket.com/albums/o100/klaasen3/Sub3/Trap.jpg)
http://scaredmonkeys.net/index.php?topic=2641.500


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #788 12/31/08 -
Post by: Keepthefaith on January 01, 2009, 03:55:54 PM
Kyle to RED at SM:
I am the one who made those screen captures from live ROV footage.
You foolishly thought they were taken from the footage on Dateline!

http://scaredmonkeys.net/index.php?topic=2660.msg357379#msg357379


Just so I'm clear. Is this quote in response to the zip lock bag photos or the original cage photos?

Kyle was upset at Red because he thought Red had done something to get ahold of the photos that Robin Holloway had posted on another website. So, Kyle is talking about those photos which Kyle had been asked by Dave Holloway for, but Kyle did not give them to him. Dave received those photos from the FBI.

oceanexploration
Scared Monkey
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 224



View Profile
   
   
Re: Natalee Case Discussion #736 2/27 -
« on: February 29, 2008, 09:27:19 AM »
   
Red,

Let me make myself perfectly clear.  Your bitterness towards me is neither my fault nor my concern.  If what you said is true and Tim Miller said something making you feel entitled to be on board this boat at some point, he was mistaken.  It was not his decision, nor mine.  He is not the project manager.  Don't take your frustrations out on me or retaliate against us or turn people against us because of your hurt feelings.  This was not personal which you're making it.

I have never made accusations towards you or SM.  I have been a strong supporter of SM since the beginning of this search.  Otherwise I wouldn't have put a link from our Blog.
The email I sent you was in confidence (which you violated) which simply asked where the pics came from and how they came to SM, where I first saw them posted.
You say how dare me?   How DARE YOU for questioning me and demand appology about those pics when you were mistaken.  I am the one who made those screen captures from live ROV footage. You foolishly thought they were taken from the footage on Dateline! Who are you to question us about our work?  Who are you to compare your search efforts to ours as if it were a contest of "who loves Natalee more"?  Newsflash: We are working on the same side, to bring justice.  Do you think we don't respect SM and your efforts since the beginning?  How wrong you are and how arrogant!
My apologies to all Monkeys.  You all know I love and respect all that you've done since the beginning, despite what Red would like you to think from his emotional rants.  It is probable that this search would not have happened if SM hasn't pushed the issues since the beginning.  I'm sorry for Red and his arrogance.  He's stepped on my toes for the last time.
« Last Edit: February 29, 2008, 09:43:58 AM by klaasend »


I've never read this but Kyle(OE) is a.OK.I get more pissed every day!


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #788 12/31/08 -
Post by: Kermit on January 01, 2009, 03:57:10 PM
Art Wood on now!

Bad news on the search.  Persistence has completed the underwater survey/grid.  Have identified 100+ objects and trying to narrow the list.  However, they are totally out of money.  If they can't come up with donations within a week or 10 days they will have to go home.

Dave Holloway has been talking to various officials to help chip in.

Without contributions Persistence is coming home.

Send contributions to the Natalee Holloway Foundation.  Everyone in the NH Foundation is a volunteer, nobody takes a salary.

Address:

Natalee Holloway Foundation
PO Box 4363
Meridian, MS   39304

http://scaredmonkeys.net/index.php?topic=2641.480


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #788 12/31/08 -
Post by: Kermit on January 01, 2009, 03:59:34 PM
Re: Natalee Case Discusstion #692 11/24/2007
« Reply #386 on: November 24, 2007, 05:20:20 PM »
 Does anyone have the Shango/Simian post that says something like, put your finger on Moko, then put your finger on (somewhere in ven)  follow the line? And if so, hope thats some of the tracks they are looking at.....OK off to catch up.
http://scaredmonkeys.net/index.php?topic=2383.msg303568#msg303568


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #788 12/31/08 -
Post by: Kermit on January 01, 2009, 04:01:19 PM
(http://i18.photobucket.com/albums/b104/Blondeonahd/persistence/PersistenceHansMosandRichardson.jpg)
Quote from: oceanexploration on November 20,2008 at 04:00:07 PM
BTW, this is certainly NOT John Silvetti.  I do not know this man.  He was with the Arubans who came on board for the Dec-30th meeting.
http://scaredmonkeys.net/index.php?topic=4153.new#new


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #788 12/31/08 -
Post by: Tamikosmom on January 01, 2009, 04:01:42 PM
Kyle stated: "The Persistence had no divers on the 7th. Tim Trahan was our diver on the 30th-Dec, but he was out of the country at the time. The Aruban divers were on the police boat, dove from their boat, and returned to their boat.

John Silvetti give up the contents of that trap/cage unchallenged to the enemy ... the enemy who has denied Natalee Holloway justice from the getgo.  This was an outright betrayal of an eighteen years old American citizen ... a long-suffering family and ... those who sacrificially donated to the Persistence undertaking.

 ::MonkeyNoNo::

Janet



Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #788 12/31/08 -
Post by: Patriot on January 01, 2009, 04:02:10 PM
Art Wood on now!

Bad news on the search.  Persistence has completed the underwater survey/grid.  Have identified 100+ objects and trying to narrow the list.  However, they are totally out of money.  If they can't come up with donations within a week or 10 days they will have to go home.

Dave Holloway has been talking to various officials to help chip in.

Without contributions Persistence is coming home.

Send contributions to the Natalee Holloway Foundation.  Everyone in the NH Foundation is a volunteer, nobody takes a salary.

Address:

Natalee Holloway Foundation
PO Box 4363
Meridian, MS   39304

http://scaredmonkeys.net/index.php?topic=2641.480


I remember this. I made a donation as soon as I heard it.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #788 12/31/08 -
Post by: Kermit on January 01, 2009, 04:02:18 PM
Tim Miller was never on the Persistence while I was not on board.  He stepped off on or about the 1st of Jan to follow up on the false lead in Costa Rica IIRC.
http://scaredmonkeys.net/index.php?topic=4153.700


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #788 12/31/08 -
Post by: Kermit on January 01, 2009, 04:04:27 PM
Kyle: Yes.  He's a good man.  I dont feel comfortable identifying everyone by name. I'm sorry.  Besides, I already read where he was identified earlier in a thread.
http://scaredmonkeys.net/index.php?topic=4153.700

Blonde - The big guy in the blue shorts and life vest is Eduardo Mansur, son of Jossy and founder of Aruba Search and Rescue.


Tim Miller: It looked like a skull. Still looks like a skull.

BUT some people speculate that Tim Tehran gave a thumbs down, meaning it isn't a skull
and not human remains.


Kyle said: What you can't see is immediately before Tim approached the trap opening, a large skate stirred up sediment reducing visibility.The quick signal came because the dive time was nearly up .
http://scaredmonkeys.net/index.php?topic=2668.280


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #788 12/31/08 -
Post by: Kermit on January 01, 2009, 04:05:07 PM
Greta van Susteren: "HANS MOS ISA LIAR."


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #788 12/31/08 -
Post by: Kermit on January 01, 2009, 04:11:32 PM
Jan 30 - Caps emails Dave "To get Natalee Body you have to come to Aruba and arrange for some large Pumps that can drain a small pond. It has an odd shape.

January 30 - I started to look at the case of Natalee on Dec 22, 2007 and I wrote a research report that was send to the FBI
I send it to klaasend for review and that's how I got here. The results was a place that everyone overlooked.
http://scaredmonkeys.net/index.php?topic=1952.msg333988#msg333988

Feb 27 - Sonar used on Pond
February 28, 2008, 07:24:57 PM
My C.S.I Degree from the University of Cryptologic consist of Simian 101, Simian 102, and Strategic Cryptology science given by Prof. Clyde Burk.
http://scaredmonkeys.net/index.php?topic=1952.msg357022#msg357022

CONTENTS INSIDE THAT CAGE:
I was convinced about the object being a skull in the Dec 29th dive.What I do know is that there is blue fabric found on the 7th of Jand a piece of blue tarp. This is reluctantly confirmed by Richardson and Mos.

CAPS:
John state the cage was empty. it was full of these broken plastic bags that shows on the cam like skull,
 but he said to me it is the water doing tricks when picture was taken.

He thinks also it is a postoffice. When I told him the story about the cage, he also understand now some things that he could not have question about. Like why is the Panter allways parked over the spot while there is notting anymore in he cage.


The meeting end at 5:00 pm and was very good.



By December 21, the search team had an accurate model cage and was able to drop it into the water and obtain a sonar signature of the cage.
http://forensicthoughtprints.com/aruba/default.html

Tim Miller also continued to believe the body was in the ocean.

http://forensicthoughtprints.com/aruba/default.html


Red posted to Kyle in response to Kyles allegations regarding the pictures: "The pictures are, according to the FBI of a crab trap and nothing to do with Natalee Holloway. NO DNA!!! So how could it possible be interfering with an investigation!!! Quit the drama! "

If the trap was of no relation to Natalee's body being found then why the sudden accusations and upset at Red thinking
he did something that harmed "their investigation"?


the dive footage the screen captures I made came from that were posted by Robin at BNH.  I sent these 6 screen shots to the FBI and the FBI only.
<snip>
the FBI gave them to Dave H

http://scaredmonkeys.net/index.php?topic=2668.msg360047#msg360047







Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #788 12/31/08 -
Post by: Kermit on January 01, 2009, 04:14:36 PM
FROM CAPS:
 
February 10, 2008 10:42:33 PM
Subject: Taking matters in Our oun Hands.


Dear friend who is seeking the truth and Family

Since January 1st, 2008, I have said that they never went to the beach, The body of Natalee was deposit in an Murky Pool in Aruba. I have established a group that is willing to start on the project of retrieving the body. I have contacted Dave, via Email and Phone and it is amazing that he is not returning my Emails and Calls. I saw him all over the TV and CABLE channels but does he has a plan to come to Aruba ?.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #788 12/31/08 -
Post by: iris44 on January 01, 2009, 04:26:52 PM
Johan's post on the previous thread regarding the dive company from Rotterdam's analysis of the ROV pictures seems pretty convincing, but there has not been much discussion about it.  Does anyone else find their analysis  fairly convincing that there was no skull in the cage?  Maybe Kyle was scamming everyone and just trying to make money off selling the pics (which he knew were not a body) to the networks.  If that is true, that could be why he did not send the info to the family and the FBI.   Maybe the networks wouldn't buy the pics because they also new it was not a body.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #788 12/31/08 -
Post by: bastibro on January 01, 2009, 04:37:33 PM
Johan's post on the previous thread regarding the dive company from Rotterdam's analysis of the ROV pictures seems pretty convincing, but there has not been much discussion about it.  Does anyone else find their analysis  fairly convincing that there was no skull in the cage?  Maybe Kyle was scamming everyone and just trying to make money off selling the pics (which he knew were not a body) to the networks.  If that is true, that could be why he did not send the info to the family and the FBI.   Maybe the networks wouldn't buy the pics because they also new it was not a body.

Hi Iris, i am convinced that there was no human skull in the cage. However i do think there were human remains there(hipsocket, buttbones).


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #788 12/31/08 -
Post by: WhiskeyGirl on January 01, 2009, 04:40:01 PM
The finger is still pointing at Aruba and those involved in the disappearance of Natalee Holloway.  It doesn't matter who or how many...they have the ability to solve this case. 

Bags and a cage may be important, was there DNA testing of any remains or samples?  Natalee may still be out there, somewhere in one of the other targets.

The finger is still shining on Aruba.    :twisted:

imho


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #788 12/31/08 -
Post by: klaasend on January 01, 2009, 04:55:37 PM
Kyle to RED at SM:
I am the one who made those screen captures from live ROV footage.
You foolishly thought they were taken from the footage on Dateline!

http://scaredmonkeys.net/index.php?topic=2660.msg357379#msg357379

I was gone for a bit and just got back.  To be clear, Kyle is referring to the picture that Robin allowed to be posted at BNH.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #788 12/31/08 -
Post by: Anna on January 01, 2009, 04:56:59 PM
>We are currently in the dry season and have not had rain for well over two months. The pond you are referring to has dried up. The information that that pond or any other pond was drained lately, is not based on the truth.<

The above I received on June 10 directly from the Office of OM.  No one drained the pond.  It is just seasonally dry. 


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #788 12/31/08 -
Post by: Anna on January 01, 2009, 05:04:34 PM
If you go back to the very first photos posted of the pond, the one of the two pipes is labeled INLETS.  Not outlets.  They are for draining the area around the pond into it and not out as they are also shown to be well above the water line.

I posted about this at the time but of course it was totally ignored.  You don't drain from a high point, etc.

And around this time, there was in fact a private search being conducted but was for Jose Tromp and had nothing to do with Natalee.

There were no 40 Dutch investigators.



I always wondered why we were being told otherwise.

.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #788 12/31/08 -
Post by: SS on January 01, 2009, 05:10:45 PM
Johan's post on the previous thread regarding the dive company from Rotterdam's analysis of the ROV pictures seems pretty convincing, but there has not been much discussion about it.  Does anyone else find their analysis  fairly convincing that there was no skull in the cage?  Maybe Kyle was scamming everyone and just trying to make money off selling the pics (which he knew were not a body) to the networks.  If that is true, that could be why he did not send the info to the family and the FBI.   Maybe the networks wouldn't buy the pics because they also new it was not a body.

Hi Iris, i am convinced that there was no human skull in the cage. However i do think there were human remains there(hipsocket, buttbones).

Hi Bastibro-  indulge me for a moment.  Please take a look at the pictures from 12/29 and then look at pictures from 1/7 when the objects are in the ziplock bags.  Does the object believed to be a skull on the 29th have the same appearance as the object believed to be a skull on 1/7.  They look very different to me.  Could something have been changed between 12/29 and 1/7?


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #788 12/31/08 -
Post by: Anna on January 01, 2009, 05:14:48 PM
Once a chain of custody is broken, there is no way to repair it.  Even if this were taken to an international court, there would be no way to prove anything ALE said was not so.

And they would just contend that they sent to the FBI everything they found.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #788 12/31/08 -
Post by: Nut44x4 on January 01, 2009, 05:16:43 PM
REMINDER for those who may want to watch again >>

The Final Hours of Natalee Holloway: E! News Special

Tue, Dec 30, 10:00 AM 11 AM ETRun Time: 60 min.

The last days before Natalee Holloway's disappearance are explored.

Tue 12/30 10:00 AM-----11AM ET
Wed 12/31 12:00 AM-----1PM ET
Sat 1/3 5:00 PM-------6AM ET
Sun 1/4 8:00 AM------ 9AM ET
http://tvlistings.zap2it.com/tvlistings/ZCProgram.do?pgmId=SH011191060000

hat tip Faith @ hftm


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #788 12/31/08 -
Post by: Nut44x4 on January 01, 2009, 05:18:40 PM
http://mysite.verizon.net/lls.fm1/natalee.mp3

Lyrics by Ericka Harvey:

"NATALEE"

I know your out there, somewhere
I can feel your presence
Pulling me, closely
Now even more than ever
I promise, to find you
I will never stop until I do

Cause everytime my heart beats
I want to cry
And everytime I take a breath
I long for you by my side
Needing just to hold you if even for awhile
Someway, somehow….Natalee where are you now?

Lord can you hear me, calling
Seeking out your face
To see you, shine through
Every cold dark place
I pray for and wait for
You to take me in your sweet embrace

Chorus ...
Someway, somehow...Oh Lord stay here with me now!

Bridge:
Oh my precious child be still and know
I’m holding on to hope and I won’t let go
I need to have you here with me
This is my prayer…this is my plea

Chorus
Oh I need you with me now

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
 JUSTICE 4 NATALEE in 2009


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #788 12/31/08 -
Post by: texasmom on January 01, 2009, 05:20:28 PM
http://scaredmonkeys.net/index.php?topic=2769.msg372252#msg372252

Whiskeygirl posted:

Re: Natalee Case Discussion #746 4/4
« Reply #500 on: April 08, 2008, 08:41:12 PM » 

Quote
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

BFN chat  -

The crew of the Persistence also did their own investigation while on Aruba.  They spoke with LE.  Someone asked what they thought of the investigators, and John noted that they didn't meet with any of the original investigators.  It's a new group working the case and they want the case solved.  He did not comment on the originals, as they never met them or worked with them.  They investigated old and new tips, psychics, nutcases, and all kinds of possibilities.  When on land, they took the time to investigate many things.  (I don't remember all the specifics, this would make a nice follow-up question) 

From what I remember, it seems like they looked at the stories that have been floating around for over two years from a "feet on the ground" perspective.  They noted that ALE has a number of possibilities still under consideration.  (my summary - the usual suspects, they just don't know what/how it happened)

Someone mentioned that when JVDS videos came out, there was a lot of interest in the mangroves at the fishermens huts.  Someone asked how many of the huts around the island had mangroves near them?  Could it have been a different set of fishermen huts?  Dave mentioned that mangroves are all over the island.

The beach at the lighthouse was brought up.  I remember pictures of some lower cliff/beach by the lighthouse, that may have had trees, it had a parking lot.  The beach area did not look like it was in the line of site from the upper area, it was secluded.  I don't remember where I saw that picture.
====================

Of the fishermen huts, this comes from Joran.  Could a trap have been stolen from the huts by the hotels, and the mangrove have been from another hut/beach area? 

The topic of the strike came up.  I was not aware of how many people were on strike.  It's not just police and air traffic controllers, but a lot of government employees.  Hopefully the strikers returned to work on Monday.  They haven't had a raise since the late 1990's. 
============

John mentioned that the Dutch/Euro people thought they were searching for oil when they started.  This brought up mention of RU, and what that site is about.  Also mentioned that the Dutch map people asked for their data so they could update their maps of the island data.
 
 
 


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #788 12/31/08 -
Post by: Nut44x4 on January 01, 2009, 05:22:15 PM
Chain of custody was broken EARLY ON ... there was a 'chain', but it was in the custody of ALE and every ounce went to what my mother used to call 'File 13'. Each and every time ANYTHING came to light.......it was 'taken care of.'


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #788 12/31/08 -
Post by: Keepthefaith on January 01, 2009, 05:27:35 PM
Once a chain of custody is broken, there is no way to repair it.  Even if this were taken to an international court, there would be no way to prove anything ALE said was not so.

And they would just contend that they sent to the FBI everything they found.

I agree.We'll never know if it was or wasn't Natalee.Why?Because Silvetti was up to something.JMOO


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #788 12/31/08 -
Post by: texasmom on January 01, 2009, 05:38:48 PM
http://scaredmonkeys.net/index.php?topic=2689.msg364756#msg364756

March 13, 2008

Posts by Private Eye:

Quote
Unfortunately, those trusted with the evidence of the investigation were not good stewards of the evidence. Evidence has been destroyed, search activities delayed with no site protection accomplished by the authorities, and interrogations have been stopped at key points and the person being interrogated allowed to be counseled by parents and attorneys, and interrogations have been stopped just short of key questions being asked when the flow of good information was beginning to come out.

Prisoners being isolated have been furnished cell phones and communication has been allowed to occur between locked up and the free.

Do I think psychics are the answer? No.

But sharing information with people who work for people who are directly orchestrating the cover up, Rudy, or the Dutch, is the most irresponsible investigating I can imagine. What kills this investigation is people having to come into it, wanting to apply basic investigatory protocols into place, and then having those channels sabotage the new evidence that the new players discover. Of course, as is happened everytime in this case, the new people eventually come to a point where the manipulation of the evidence is undeniable, but by then the fruits of their work are gone, and there is simply another member of the believers of the cover up group. What I pray that Kyle and the crew of the Persistence will determine, is that  regardless of how hard working the man that they are working with appears to work, his work belongs to Rudy, and Rudy belongs to the local dutch.

We are not hysterical, ignorant, paranoid people. We have seen the cover up in action, in broad daylight, with impunity, and if you disregard our warnings, you will become the next chump in a series of chumps, no matter how sophisticated your equipment, the level of your educational achievement, or the extent of your job skills and work history.

Quote
I don't believe that Kyle or anyone else is allowed to review the case documents, according to the policy of the prosecutors office. I thought the beauty of the Persistence is that they were to do a true grid seach mission which depends not on psychics or even tips from the authorities, and as such their work would be independent of the investigation. They were there simply to attempt to search a predefined area for Natalee's remains. So I am not sure why they have been lured into defending the work of the Aruban authorities or a discussion of the validity of the investigation as they are not knowledgeable as to the investigation, other than what they have been told by these Arubans. There are an awful lot of highly educated people who have been chumped by people of far less formal education.  A well trained police force is not thwarted by a grieving mother and the media.

And Kyle, I by no means am being disrespectful, I think you are brilliant, sincerely. But I don't think your education or work experience has prepared you for a cover up by these types of people. And I think you may be severely underestimating the education, experience, and wisdom of the monkeys and other coverup believers. Don't let them make a fool of you. We need you.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #788 12/31/08 -
Post by: nimrod on January 01, 2009, 05:52:18 PM
Johan's post on the previous thread regarding the dive company from Rotterdam's analysis of the ROV pictures seems pretty convincing, but there has not been much discussion about it.  Does anyone else find their analysis  fairly convincing that there was no skull in the cage?  Maybe Kyle was scamming everyone and just trying to make money off selling the pics (which he knew were not a body) to the networks.  If that is true, that could be why he did not send the info to the family and the FBI.   Maybe the networks wouldn't buy the pics because they also new it was not a body.


Bingo!!

I've never seen one thing in that cage that looks like human remains to me.. I agree with you that "someone" could be trying to capitalize on a failed mission in the search for Natalee.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #788 12/31/08 -
Post by: bastibro on January 01, 2009, 05:59:10 PM
Johan's post on the previous thread regarding the dive company from Rotterdam's analysis of the ROV pictures seems pretty convincing, but there has not been much discussion about it.  Does anyone else find their analysis  fairly convincing that there was no skull in the cage?  Maybe Kyle was scamming everyone and just trying to make money off selling the pics (which he knew were not a body) to the networks.  If that is true, that could be why he did not send the info to the family and the FBI.   Maybe the networks wouldn't buy the pics because they also new it was not a body.


Bingo!!

I've never seen one thing in that cage that looks like human remains to me.. I agree with you that "someone" could be trying to capitalize on a failed mission in the search for Natalee.

Well, what do you think this is?

(http://i272.photobucket.com/albums/jj176/bastibro/verwant/2345840954_e00aee9854_o.jpg)
(http://i272.photobucket.com/albums/jj176/bastibro/verwant/hip_socket.jpg)


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #788 12/31/08 -
Post by: jen3560 on January 01, 2009, 06:00:53 PM


Did Kyle ever describe the protocol in terms of who Silvetti would speak with in terms of the ALE.Was it typically Mos or was it Richardson?Still curious as to Comemencia.He always seems to be around but seldom talked about.He's a little elusive!Thanx Jen.

The only people Kyle ever mentioned were Mos and Richardson.  He never did provide the names to us about any other ALE who were involved - at any stage.

That's when he started to clam up - when we asked him for other names, specifically of who was on board, and who the divers were.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #788 12/31/08 -
Post by: jen3560 on January 01, 2009, 06:04:14 PM
keepthefaith,

you are correct.  John Silvetti was the Project Lead (along with Tim Trahan and Tim Miller).

By the time jan 7 rolled around - the ONLY Project Lead left aboard was John Silvetti.

So even Tim Trahan was not on board Jan. 7th?  Where did he go?  So did anyone have footage of the Jan. 7th dive at all?  If not then Silvetti did his job well and betrayed the family completely.  Has anyone asked Jossy about his son and what he has to say about all of this?  Or is that why Jossy has become so quiet lately?  I like Jossy but (sorry) I have always had a rather funny feeling about his motives in all this.  Mostly is appears more political than anything.

I honestly don't recall if Kyle ever told us where Tim Trahan went - perhaps some of the other birdies could answer that one.

The footage of both the Dec 30 and Jan 7 dives were in a "safe place" that "only two people have access to - Silvetti, and a project manager of Silvetti's".  according to Kyle.

He did give us the name of that PM, but I don't recall it - again, maybe one of the other birdies can answer that.

But I did specifically ask Kyle if that PM was Shaefer - and was told no, then he gave us the guy's name.

So no - that footage, along with the log books, never left the hands of Silvetti once the Persistence was back home (that we knew of).

Except, of course, for what Kyle had on his computer.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #788 12/31/08 -
Post by: jen3560 on January 01, 2009, 06:06:21 PM
ldstlou wrote:
Tim Miller wasn't removed from anywhere...are you kidding me? You really think he would allow himself to be removed? He was following up a lead in Nicaragua.
------------------


I'm sorry to say - yes he was.  Along with Dateline.

Dec 30th, Kyle and Tim Miller discussed this issue in detail, but they didn't know how to handle it.  Then Kyle took a nap.  When he got up, Tim and Dateline had been ejected from the boat.

ldstlou, I don't know what fairy tales Kyle and others are now telling you, but Kyle's posts (with IP, date and time) are in their original form from when he posted them.  This item was discussed over several posts.

The Nicarauga thing didn't happen for a few more days after that, IIRC.


I cannot comprehend why Lou does not read Kyle's own words on the this topic.

Is it possible that Kyle's supporters actually believe that his words the he posted on the Natalee's Freebird's forum and the Scared Monkey forum ... words that imply that Americans actually assisted in the finale' to the great Aruban coverup ... are going to become a non-issue?

Happy New Year Jen.  Happy New Year All.

Janet

Happy New Year Janet!!

It seems as if that's precisely what they're trying to see happen.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #788 12/31/08 -
Post by: nimrod on January 01, 2009, 06:12:29 PM
Johan's post on the previous thread regarding the dive company from Rotterdam's analysis of the ROV pictures seems pretty convincing, but there has not been much discussion about it.  Does anyone else find their analysis  fairly convincing that there was no skull in the cage?  Maybe Kyle was scamming everyone and just trying to make money off selling the pics (which he knew were not a body) to the networks.  If that is true, that could be why he did not send the info to the family and the FBI.   Maybe the networks wouldn't buy the pics because they also new it was not a body.


Bingo!!

I've never seen one thing in that cage that looks like human remains to me.. I agree with you that "someone" could be trying to capitalize on a failed mission in the search for Natalee.

Well, what do you think this is?

(http://i272.photobucket.com/albums/jj176/bastibro/verwant/2345840954_e00aee9854_o.jpg)
(http://i272.photobucket.com/albums/jj176/bastibro/verwant/hip_socket.jpg)

I don't know what it is. Do you?


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #788 12/31/08 -
Post by: jen3560 on January 01, 2009, 06:13:30 PM
I want to add one more thing to my above post:  IF this was remains in the cage.   This puts us back to the MAIN question:  If these were remains in the cage WERE they Natalee's remains?  If it is Natalee's remains THEN the Persistence's aided and abetted the Aruban government to cover it up.  Not the results Natalee's family were looking for and were promised by John Silvetti.  (JMO)   ::MonkeyNoNo::

Precisely the reason legal counsel advised us to steer clear of Persistence crew - and why we then immediately banned Kyle.

Once we discovered he had NEVER submitted any of this to the FBI - we knew that if we a) kept quiet and b) retained our association with him - that we, too, could be accessories after the fact.........................by doing nothing about it.

We rectified that.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #788 12/31/08 -
Post by: jen3560 on January 01, 2009, 06:19:13 PM
Kyle stated: "The Persistence had no divers on the 7th. Tim Trahan was our diver on the 30th-Dec, but he was out of the country at the time. The Aruban divers were on the police boat, dove from their boat, and returned to their boat.

Thankies Kerm!

I couldn't remember what Kyle had told us about where Trahan had gone.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #788 12/31/08 -
Post by: jen3560 on January 01, 2009, 06:24:12 PM
truthseeker,

this one is for you - regarding the discussion we were having the other day.

thanks to kerm for re-posting it!!


#926 on: December 03, 2008, 12:03:25 AM   SS
Speaking of Imelda's shoes brings a question to mind about Urine's shoes.  The pond witness saw him walking without one shoe.  Did he specify if Urine was missing a right shoe or a left shoe?  Supposedly there was a bloody shoe in Urine's closet that Paulass could have disposed of several days later.  Can we determine if it's a right shoe or a left shoe in the cage?  This could possibly clear up all of these shoes, especially since there are reports that one of Urine's shoes was also found in Monserat pond.http://scaredmonkeys.net/index.php?topic=4182.msg564821#msg564821


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #788 12/31/08 -
Post by: Edward on January 01, 2009, 06:25:24 PM
It looks to me as Caps and Simian and most likely Shango are the same person..  ::MonkeyRoll::
Like this person is some sort of forensics investigator that is giving leads or this person is not allowed to be directly involved..? Just shows up at crime scenes and has ears.?
So between what he/she hears at work and what she/he knows at the lab and what this person thinks of the island and its upper crust..?
Or Not..  ::MonkeyWink::
 I do believe this person appears to practice or believe in Santeria... or knows it well.
That would mean they are probably not Dutch or Jewish or Lebanese or North American..
Could be Aruban and Could be South American or Could be Cuban too.
That is what I think..  ::MonkeyEek::

 I have said since the beginning. It was probably hashed up at the Internet cafe between depecker and his brother hashish and all their cronies.  All of them computer geeks too..
This area of the world is where Internet Gambling was created.. Software engineers the plenty.. Young and Old.
 It could be anyone in that original group and or any number of them working together to create Shango and Simian..
Then comes Cap, and this appears to be one person.. misleading everyone..
 
But then to complicate matters more ... various other oddities compared to any other case..
1. Massive news coverage with many people watching.. which is what EVERYONE wants. Right ?
 Everyone benefits here weather ya like it or not.. Beth and Aruba in the Long run as positive attention or negative attention it is all attention in the end.. Like a friend told me he has no worries about travel to Aruba with his daughter, he said they are so freaked about another American girl harmed that the word is on the street, hands off! .. It appears to be true.. Not one more in 3 years.??

2. A lawsuit launched by a suspect against the richest woman in the world Oprah, going through Dr.Phil with a potential for millions in settlement.

3. We have Marcos.. ::MonkeyEek::  From the very far out area.. Like Nicaragua..?
Which is located in nowhere Central?  ::MonkeyRoll::
   I have personal friends in México. South America and The Virgin islands who live there full time.. They never see anything about Natalee Holloway in the news for 2 years.. Yet this guy E.Mails Dave.. and CALLS HIM and last but not lease MEETS TIM and a American Embassy person in the American embassy? WITH CAMERAS ROLLING !

4. Derives.. and all you have seen.. and the informant attacked in Aruba ..
Who attacked him ? what was there names? Then this informant is himself arrested and is still being held ?
What about this Thai human trafficking thing ? Where is the Victim ?
It is all for attention..

 5. How and why does this benefit JVDS loot ? He does not have to travel. He is Not a Wanted Man by anyone for any reason? Why Then is he where he is ?
Rumors of Male Prostitution? Rumors..
Taking classes in college on the subject of Human Trafficking? A training course?  ::MonkeyWink::
Father Paulus is behind the Major Deepak Dr.Phil lawsuit ? Waiting for Deepak to win ?
Are most of these individuals involved "not the news" lined up for what all of them think is going to be a very large payout ?
We do not have one victim .. If he was or is violent we should have a victim past present or future.. ? ..What a set up.. What and act ? Everything is a lie ? Everything..
There is a reason for this I am sure.. Where is the sociopathic killer ?

 That takes it far beyond some computer Geeks in the Internet cafe..  A world wide group conspires to keep one lone family from the truth of what happened to there daughter?
It is all about money.. They forgot about Natalee on 5-31-05 ?

Or is this about getting a American citizen case up against the world court in the Hague ?
Setting precedence and allowing the world court to have ultimate control over us ?
It is a DUTCH CONTROL thing.. ? They are having a phobia about it.. ?

Or is all this just keeping everyone looking away from ? well I have a whole list of names for various reasons.. one particular in Venezuela and Two possible on the fine island of Aruba..

Never the less I have no answers.. So I keep reading and Researching..
I do not think there has ever been a case like this in history..  ::MonkeyNoNo::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #788 12/31/08 -
Post by: bastibro on January 01, 2009, 06:29:14 PM
Johan's post on the previous thread regarding the dive company from Rotterdam's analysis of the ROV pictures seems pretty convincing, but there has not been much discussion about it.  Does anyone else find their analysis  fairly convincing that there was no skull in the cage?  Maybe Kyle was scamming everyone and just trying to make money off selling the pics (which he knew were not a body) to the networks.  If that is true, that could be why he did not send the info to the family and the FBI.   Maybe the networks wouldn't buy the pics because they also new it was not a body.


Bingo!!

I've never seen one thing in that cage that looks like human remains to me.. I agree with you that "someone" could be trying to capitalize on a failed mission in the search for Natalee.

Well, what do you think this is?

(http://i272.photobucket.com/albums/jj176/bastibro/verwant/2345840954_e00aee9854_o.jpg)
(http://i272.photobucket.com/albums/jj176/bastibro/verwant/hip_socket.jpg)

I don't know what it is. Do you?

I think it looks a lot like a human ischium . .  ::MonkeyShocked::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #788 12/31/08 -
Post by: bastibro on January 01, 2009, 06:37:13 PM
truthseeker,

this one is for you - regarding the discussion we were having the other day.

thanks to kerm for re-posting it!!


#926 on: December 03, 2008, 12:03:25 AM   SS
Speaking of Imelda's shoes brings a question to mind about Urine's shoes.  The pond witness saw him walking without one shoe.  Did he specify if Urine was missing a right shoe or a left shoe?  Supposedly there was a bloody shoe in Urine's closet that Paulass could have disposed of several days later.  Can we determine if it's a right shoe or a left shoe in the cage?  This could possibly clear up all of these shoes, especially since there are reports that one of Urine's shoes was also found in Monserat pond.http://scaredmonkeys.net/index.php?topic=4182.msg564821#msg564821

The witness, Mister Heerman noticed Urine missing his right shoe.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #788 12/31/08 -
Post by: truthseeker2 on January 01, 2009, 06:40:36 PM
truthseeker,

this one is for you - regarding the discussion we were having the other day.

thanks to kerm for re-posting it!!


#926 on: December 03, 2008, 12:03:25 AM   SS
Speaking of Imelda's shoes brings a question to mind about Urine's shoes.  The pond witness saw him walking without one shoe.  Did he specify if Urine was missing a right shoe or a left shoe?  Supposedly there was a bloody shoe in Urine's closet that Paulass could have disposed of several days later.  Can we determine if it's a right shoe or a left shoe in the cage?  This could possibly clear up all of these shoes, especially since there are reports that one of Urine's shoes was also found in Monserat pond.http://scaredmonkeys.net/index.php?topic=4182.msg564821#msg564821

Sorry, don't remember which dicussion.  What, specifically, were we discussing with regard to the shoes and/or the pond???

I am usually off researching other things and don't always keep track of all the discussions.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #788 12/31/08 -
Post by: Blue Moon on January 01, 2009, 06:41:22 PM
Jen, did Kyle ever mention a shoe being in that cage?  I also saw where he watched a diver removing blue fabric from underneath sand.  Was that during the dec.30th or Jan. 7th dive?  Guess it is too much to ask if maybe Tim Trahan happened to get a little sample of that blue fabric?


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #788 12/31/08 -
Post by: wreck on January 01, 2009, 06:45:31 PM
If "Dateline" was also ejected on the 30th - perhaps they have a dog in this fight as well for fraud and breech of contract against the Persistence.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #788 12/31/08 -
Post by: Nut44x4 on January 01, 2009, 06:48:00 PM
Never any doubt in my mind that what was found in that trap were human remains. Natalee or not (I do think it was her), someone was in that cage/trap. No doubt ... right billb?   :cool:


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #788 12/31/08 -
Post by: Keepthefaith on January 01, 2009, 06:48:28 PM
If "Dateline" was also ejected on the 30th - perhaps they have a dog in this fight as well for fraud and breech of contract against the Persistence.

Would be interesting!Time will tell with Kyle and Silvetti.I'm still curious to hear what CapsLockWizard has to say.Been Lurkin quite a bit!


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #788 12/31/08 -
Post by: wreck on January 01, 2009, 06:50:07 PM
Never any doubt in my mind that what was found in that trap were human remains. Natalee or not (I do think it was her), someone was in that cage/trap. No doubt ... right billb?   :cool:
I do as well. If the "remains" were not Natalee -- there would be no reason to be secretive or cover-up.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #788 12/31/08 -
Post by: Keepthefaith on January 01, 2009, 06:51:06 PM
Never any doubt in my mind that what was found in that trap were human remains. Natalee or not (I do think it was her), someone was in that cage/trap. No doubt ... right billb?   :cool:

I do agree Nut.Why would you bag stuff up from a cage out in the ocean if the stuff in it wasn't Human remains?After the first dive why would you even go back if there was nothing of importance in that cage?


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #788 12/31/08 -
Post by: bleachedblack on January 01, 2009, 06:55:54 PM
Never any doubt in my mind that what was found in that trap were human remains. Natalee or not (I do think it was her), someone was in that cage/trap. No doubt ... right billb?   :cool:

I agree....I stand with the Nut. ::MonkeyWink::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #788 12/31/08 -
Post by: texasmom on January 01, 2009, 06:57:15 PM
Article about an accident, I think it is about Polis Commissioner Lambertus Krozendijk. 

http://www.24ora.com/content/view/6915/8/

Papiamentu translation:

diaranson nightfall was have one racha of accidente one behind another y at stone plat one comisario of police (krozendijk) owing to stay injury. the comisario was on his harley davidson y was envolvi in one accidente together cu one car of family. the comisario owing to stay enough injury y is interna in hospital. click read more for more imagen. come across

(http://www.24ora.com/mambots/content/multithumb/images/1..stories.news.2008.december2008.dec28.coisy.DSCF1365.JPG)


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #788 12/31/08 -
Post by: Anna on January 01, 2009, 06:58:06 PM
TxMom, Here that cabbage wouldn't cut it, too pale.  We have to have REAL greens as in turnip, collard, mustard or my personal fav a mixture of those three plus kale and spinach.  I like to think that will bring a mixture of denominations.

Speaking of collards, those Arubans really seem to love those, don't they, with so many collard houses!  Tee hee hee!

,


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #788 12/31/08 -
Post by: texasmom on January 01, 2009, 06:58:45 PM
Never any doubt in my mind that what was found in that trap were human remains. Natalee or not (I do think it was her), someone was in that cage/trap. No doubt ... right billb?   :cool:
I do as well. If the "remains" were not Natalee -- there would be no reason to be secretive or cover-up.

I agree! 


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #788 12/31/08 -
Post by: Anna on January 01, 2009, 07:03:04 PM
If that would happen to be a policeman's service cap recovered in the trap, I can think of several reasons for keeping it quiet.  Even if not related to Natalee.  There are other shady dealings that go on there as well.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #788 12/31/08 -
Post by: Nut44x4 on January 01, 2009, 07:08:47 PM
This is a tad early, but I have to sign out. HAPPY FREAKIN' NEW YEAR AGAIN to all ... I LOVE THESE NEW warnings!! Thanks CBB  YOU ROCK!
(http://i25.photobucket.com/albums/c100/crazybabyborgs/MOD/modlock4.gif)


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #788 12/31/08 -
Post by: Anna on January 01, 2009, 07:08:54 PM
Murder and Crime Rate In Aruba « 1 2 ... 39 40 »  Anna  788  96064   December 23, 2008, 12:39:47 PM
 

http://scaredmonkeys.net/index.php?topic=188.0


96,000+ views.  They just don't like to admit to having ANY crime and when we started the M&C thread were even trying to say only one murder in the last twenty years.  Guess that sounds better than having the highest murder rate in the world in that general region.



Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #788 12/31/08 -
Post by: truthseeker2 on January 01, 2009, 07:09:38 PM
If that would happen to be a policeman's service cap recovered in the trap, I can think of several reasons for keeping it quiet.  Even if not related to Natalee.  There are other shady dealings that go on there as well.

I remember some of the cap pictures you found.  What if there were human remains and they belonged to a policeman!


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #788 12/31/08 -
Post by: Nut44x4 on January 01, 2009, 07:11:29 PM
 ::MonkeyCool::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #788 12/31/08 -
Post by: wingnut on January 01, 2009, 07:12:32 PM
Never any doubt in my mind that what was found in that trap were human remains. Natalee or not (I do think it was her), someone was in that cage/trap. No doubt ... right billb?   :cool:
I do as well. If the "remains" were not Natalee -- there would be no reason to be secretive or cover-up.

I agree! 


Kyle referred to the contents as REMAINS.  Not once, not twice - but over and over and over.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #788 12/31/08 -
Post by: Anna on January 01, 2009, 07:13:14 PM
If that would happen to be a policeman's service cap recovered in the trap, I can think of several reasons for keeping it quiet.  Even if not related to Natalee.  There are other shady dealings that go on there as well.

I remember some of the cap pictures you found.  What if there were human remains and they belonged to a policeman!


Or a boat captain or something that wears a service cap. 

Yes, it is the not knowing if it was Natalee or not that makes us want to bang our heads against a wall.   Now, how will we ever know since the chain of custody was not even protected from those openly known to discard and conceal?  What a mess!!!

Or what if the service cap was put in the cage to implicate someone or keep them quiet about what they knew about the trap contents?



Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #788 12/31/08 -
Post by: wingnut on January 01, 2009, 07:15:02 PM
What is the cap thing to which you are referring? 


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #788 12/31/08 -
Post by: Nut44x4 on January 01, 2009, 07:16:05 PM
New thread #789 is ready when it is ready to switch.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #788 12/31/08 -
Post by: Anna on January 01, 2009, 07:16:12 PM
OK, just for speculation, let's say Police Chief vdS is involved in hiring someone to dispose of remains.  The ones doing the disposal just happen to pick up his cap and toss it in the trap along with remains, etc. as insurance that he will never implicate them.

I know that is over-thinking but the thought has occurred to me many times.  Hard not to run wild with the things that could be.

.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #788 12/31/08 -
Post by: wingnut on January 01, 2009, 07:20:32 PM
OK, just for speculation, let's say Police Chief vdS is involved in hiring someone to dispose of remains.  The ones doing the disposal just happen to pick up his cap and toss it in the trap along with remains, etc. as insurance that he will never implicate them.

I know that is over-thinking but the thought has occurred to me many times.  Hard not to run wild with the things that could be.

.


There was never discussion of a cap.  There was blue denim-like fabric, and a blue tarp which was found outside the cage.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #788 12/31/08 -
Post by: wreck on January 01, 2009, 07:22:28 PM
What is the cap thing to which you are referring? 
Anna and others see what they think is a blue cap with an "emblem" on it. I don't  see it -- but I can't cmpletely discount it.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #788 12/31/08 -
Post by: billb's daughter on January 01, 2009, 07:23:22 PM
Never any doubt in my mind that what was found in that trap were human remains. Natalee or not (I do think it was her), someone was in that cage/trap. No doubt ... right billb?   :cool:
I do as well. If the "remains" were not Natalee -- there would be no reason to be secretive or cover-up.
Nut, Wreck...I'm convinced there were remains in the cage primarily because of Tim Miller's reaction which prompted his 99.9% sure phone call to Dave. Then you add Kyle's own words here and on Freebirds, exposed by Kermit and backed up by multiple birdies...pretty convincing I'd say. I also strongly believe the remains are those of Natalee; otherwise, i think pos Mos were have revealed the contents of the cage..Hey, they could have explained away any other remains than Natalee was a result of an fishing boat accident involving a crew member or whatever else could reasonable fit the cage contents..
Some have suggested Kyle may have deliberately manipulated the secrecy behind the recovery efforts to promote his selling the photos for big bucks, but I think that's remote. I may be wrong of course, but as Janet likes to say: Logic dictates..........
JMHO..


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #788 12/31/08 -
Post by: Anna on January 01, 2009, 07:24:27 PM
What is the cap thing to which you are referring? 



(http://i15.photobucket.com/albums/a360/AnnaBlueSkies/Holloway/polishatcompare.jpg)

It is only MY opinion it is a police cap but Magnolia and others do see it as well.

.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #788 12/31/08 -
Post by: Anna on January 01, 2009, 07:25:56 PM
OK, just for speculation, let's say Police Chief vdS is involved in hiring someone to dispose of remains.  The ones doing the disposal just happen to pick up his cap and toss it in the trap along with remains, etc. as insurance that he will never implicate them.

I know that is over-thinking but the thought has occurred to me many times.  Hard not to run wild with the things that could be.

.


There was never discussion of a cap.  There was blue denim-like fabric, and a blue tarp which was found outside the cage.



Well, I see what I see regardless of whether it was discussed or not.


.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #788 12/31/08 -
Post by: wingnut on January 01, 2009, 07:27:50 PM
What is the cap thing to which you are referring? 



(http://i15.photobucket.com/albums/a360/AnnaBlueSkies/Holloway/polishatcompare.jpg)

It is only MY opinion it is a police cap but Magnolia and others do see it as well.

.


It is my understanding that that is the blue denim-like fabric.  My opinion - Natalee's skirt, or what is left of it.



Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #788 12/31/08 -
Post by: Kermit on January 01, 2009, 07:29:25 PM
Never any doubt in my mind that what was found in that trap were human remains. Natalee or not (I do think it was her), someone was in that cage/trap. No doubt ... right billb?   :cool:
I do as well. If the "remains" were not Natalee -- there would be no reason to be secretive or cover-up.

I agree! 


Kyle referred to the contents as REMAINS.  Not once, not twice - but over and over and over.



oceanexploration
Re: Natalee Case Discussion #744 3/19 -
« Reply #363 on: March 20, 2008, 02:36:39 AM »

Kyle said: "Human remains were found, but the FBI was not and would not comment on the case.  The FBI did not comment on the remains, but rather the fabric sample"

Oceanexploration: "I never said there were no human remains"
http://scaredmonkeys.net/index.php?topic=2668.msg360330#msg360330


Kyle: "I think it is highly unlikely and completely inconsistent with numerous testimonies and other evidence that the pond (or anything but the ocean) contains Natalee's remains

« Reply #802 on: December 02, 2008, 05:16:26 PM »

Kyle said: “The portion of the discolored blue fabric was presumably on the bottom of the fabric. In my opinion this discoloration is not another type of fabric, but rather biological staining or discoloration from biological growth caused from a high organic carbon content and decay. Basically, during decay a biological mat will form around the organics from remains. This is what I believe it is on the bottom of the fabric.

http://scaredmonkeys.net/index.php?topic=4182.msg564125;topicseen#msg564125




Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #788 12/31/08 -
Post by: wingnut on January 01, 2009, 07:29:50 PM
OK, just for speculation, let's say Police Chief vdS is involved in hiring someone to dispose of remains.  The ones doing the disposal just happen to pick up his cap and toss it in the trap along with remains, etc. as insurance that he will never implicate them.

I know that is over-thinking but the thought has occurred to me many times.  Hard not to run wild with the things that could be.

.


There was never discussion of a cap.  There was blue denim-like fabric, and a blue tarp which was found outside the cage.



Well, I see what I see regardless of whether it was discussed or not.


.


Fair enough.  I see a denim skirt, and where I see pieces of Natalee's top - others don't.



Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #788 12/31/08 -
Post by: truthseeker2 on January 01, 2009, 07:30:40 PM
If that would happen to be a policeman's service cap recovered in the trap, I can think of several reasons for keeping it quiet.  Even if not related to Natalee.  There are other shady dealings that go on there as well.

I remember some of the cap pictures you found.  What if there were human remains and they belonged to a policeman!


Or a boat captain or something that wears a service cap. 

Yes, it is the not knowing if it was Natalee or not that makes us want to bang our heads against a wall.   Now, how will we ever know since the chain of custody was not even protected from those openly known to discard and conceal?  What a mess!!!

Or what if the service cap was put in the cage to implicate someone or keep them quiet about what they knew about the trap contents?



Thant's a spooky thought, Anna.  But, this is Aruba we are talking about.  Anything goes and anything is possible.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #788 12/31/08 -
Post by: Keepthefaith on January 01, 2009, 07:32:20 PM
Did the Freebirds come up with an opinion based on their research of how the cage,and or Natalee got out there.I think you started to touch on it Kermit but don't remember if it was followed up on.The Gottenbo's??


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #788 12/31/08 -
Post by: klaasend on January 01, 2009, 07:33:20 PM
What is the cap thing to which you are referring? 

From some angles it looks like a polic hat:



(http://i118.photobucket.com/albums/o100/klaasen3/Sub5/polishatcompare.jpg)


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #788 12/31/08 -
Post by: wingnut on January 01, 2009, 07:34:21 PM
Never any doubt in my mind that what was found in that trap were human remains. Natalee or not (I do think it was her), someone was in that cage/trap. No doubt ... right billb?   :cool:
I do as well. If the "remains" were not Natalee -- there would be no reason to be secretive or cover-up.

I agree! 


Kyle referred to the contents as REMAINS.  Not once, not twice - but over and over and over.



oceanexploration
Re: Natalee Case Discussion #744 3/19 -
« Reply #363 on: March 20, 2008, 02:36:39 AM »

Kyle said: "Human remains were found, but the FBI was not and would not comment on the case.  The FBI did not comment on the remains, but rather the fabric sample"

Oceanexploration: "I never said there were no human remains"
http://scaredmonkeys.net/index.php?topic=2668.msg360330#msg360330


Kyle: "I think it is highly unlikely and completely inconsistent with numerous testimonies and other evidence that the pond (or anything but the ocean) contains Natalee's remains

« Reply #802 on: December 02, 2008, 05:16:26 PM »

Kyle said: “The portion of the discolored blue fabric was presumably on the bottom of the fabric. In my opinion this discoloration is not another type of fabric, but rather biological staining or discoloration from biological growth caused from a high organic carbon content and decay. Basically, during decay a biological mat will form around the organics from remains. This is what I believe it is on the bottom of the fabric.

http://scaredmonkeys.net/index.php?topic=4182.msg564125;topicseen#msg564125





Thanks, Kermie.  See - this is what I was talking about, Anna.  Part of the contents of that bag look like Natalee's top - but others disagree.



Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #788 12/31/08 -
Post by: wingnut on January 01, 2009, 07:35:34 PM
Oops, I should have said THIS in my post above:


Part of the contents of that bag look like Natalee's top TO ME


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #788 12/31/08 -
Post by: Kermit on January 01, 2009, 07:37:25 PM
Kyle said it was Blue denim-like fabric. Possible denim skirt
other possible fabric..unknown from the video what it is
Piece of blue tarp found 15-30 feet away from the trap opening - suggest scavenging.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #788 12/31/08 -
Post by: Anna on January 01, 2009, 07:38:18 PM
OK, just for speculation, let's say Police Chief vdS is involved in hiring someone to dispose of remains.  The ones doing the disposal just happen to pick up his cap and toss it in the trap along with remains, etc. as insurance that he will never implicate them.

I know that is over-thinking but the thought has occurred to me many times.  Hard not to run wild with the things that could be.

.


There was never discussion of a cap.  There was blue denim-like fabric, and a blue tarp which was found outside the cage.



Well, I see what I see regardless of whether it was discussed or not.


.


Fair enough.  I see a denim skirt, and where I see pieces of Natalee's top - others don't.




In the fish trap, this cap is not where the skirt would be and where it is with the super-imposed Natalee over the contents.  It is where her chest would have been.  And not under sand as we were told the skirt fabric was.  I think they are two very different items.

But it is just my take on it and what I see.  Appears the bill of the cap has had a couple of bites taken out of it but the emblem still appears to have a cross  on it.

.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #788 12/31/08 -
Post by: wreck on January 01, 2009, 07:38:31 PM
I think Caps' most questionable statement is that Natalee was "cut up" in several pieces. He had to explain why only "some" of her remains would be found in the pond.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #788 12/31/08 -
Post by: billb's daughter on January 01, 2009, 07:39:23 PM
Never any doubt in my mind that what was found in that trap were human remains. Natalee or not (I do think it was her), someone was in that cage/trap. No doubt ... right billb?   :cool:
I do as well. If the "remains" were not Natalee -- there would be no reason to be secretive or cover-up.
Nut, Wreck...I'm convinced there were remains in the cage primarily because of Tim Miller's reaction which prompted his 99.9% sure phone call to Dave. Then you add Kyle's own words here and on Freebirds, exposed by Kermit and backed up by multiple birdies...pretty convincing I'd say. I also strongly believe the remains are those of Natalee; otherwise, i think pos Mos were have revealed the contents of the cage..Hey, they could have explained away any other remains than Natalee was a result of an fishing boat accident involving a crew member or whatever else could reasonable fit the cage contents..
Some have suggested Kyle may have deliberately manipulated the secrecy behind the recovery efforts to promote his selling the photos for big bucks, but I think that's remote. I may be wrong of course, but as Janet likes to say: Logic dictates..........
JMHO..
To be clear. I DO believe Kyle tried to sell the photos. I DON'T believe Kyle tried to make potential buyers think the photos contained Natalee's remains....


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #788 12/31/08 -
Post by: SS on January 01, 2009, 07:39:51 PM
I have had a very interesting thought, but maybe some of you might think I've lost it.  Kermit said that she had IPs for Caps from Aruba, NY, and Paris.  This seems unusual to me for someone who John Silvetti claimed was unemployed.  Do you suppose that Caps could be some kind of an agent, like CIA or something?


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #788 12/31/08 -
Post by: texasmom on January 01, 2009, 07:40:34 PM
TxMom, Here that cabbage wouldn't cut it, too pale.  We have to have REAL greens as in turnip, collard, mustard or my personal fav a mixture of those three plus kale and spinach.  I like to think that will bring a mixture of denominations.

Speaking of collards, those Arubans really seem to love those, don't they, with so many collard houses!  Tee hee hee!

,

I loved turnips and collards as a girl in Mississippi!  Haven't had a taste for them in years though.

Dinner was delicious!  I'm miserable!  

Collard houses!   ::MonkeyHaHa::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #788 12/31/08 -
Post by: Kermit on January 01, 2009, 07:40:35 PM
bastibro it seems you and Kyle agree.

Kyle said: “The bag that is above the denim bag looks to me as though it contains pieces of
 vertebrae.”


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #788 12/31/08 -
Post by: Keepthefaith on January 01, 2009, 07:41:58 PM
Did the Freebirds come up with an opinion based on their research of how the cage,and or Natalee got out there.I think you started to touch on it Kermit but don't remember if it was followed up on.The Gottenbo's??

Bump


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #788 12/31/08 -
Post by: Kermit on January 01, 2009, 07:42:45 PM
Kyle said: “I'm sorry if this is disturbing. I took the picture of Natalee standing on the beach and cropped, rotated, and scaled the image to correlate with the trap body form.
Notice the end of the skirt is an identical match to the 90 degree angle in the sand.


The blue fabric was found right where the skirt is pictured. If it isn't her, it will forever haunt me as a major cosmic WTF.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #788 12/31/08 -
Post by: Anna on January 01, 2009, 07:43:41 PM
Did the Freebirds come up with an opinion based on their research of how the cage,and or Natalee got out there.I think you started to touch on it Kermit but don't remember if it was followed up on.The Gottenbo's??

Bump


Or the Colombians supposedly in the tapes TJ Ward has?  I want to hear those tapes as I have been hearing about them forever.

.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #788 12/31/08 -
Post by: Kermit on January 01, 2009, 07:44:07 PM
Kyle said: “In my opinion, the blue fabric is quite possibly Natalee's skirt. The divers found the denim where I suggested a week earlier (Dec 29th) to Tim Miller that there was likely Natalee's denim skirt under the sand.
- Also in my opinion, the deni-like fabric is a match in terms of color, quantity, and structure to Natalee's skirt. It's not a lot of denim folded in the bag, but then again her skirt was rather small.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #788 12/31/08 -
Post by: Anna on January 01, 2009, 07:45:23 PM
Kyle said: “I'm sorry if this is disturbing. I took the picture of Natalee standing on the beach and cropped, rotated, and scaled the image to correlate with the trap body form.
Notice the end of the skirt is an identical match to the 90 degree angle in the sand.


The blue fabric was found right where the skirt is pictured. If it isn't her, it will forever haunt me as a major cosmic WTF.


Yes but the cap is on where the chest of Natalee would be per this diagram.  So how did the cap wind up in the evidence bag as the skirt I wonder?  It was on the chest area.

Just one of many things that make me have headache about those photos.

.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #788 12/31/08 -
Post by: Keepthefaith on January 01, 2009, 07:45:49 PM
Did the Freebirds come up with an opinion based on their research of how the cage,and or Natalee got out there.I think you started to touch on it Kermit but don't remember if it was followed up on.The Gottenbo's??

Bump


Or the Colombians supposedly in the tapes TJ Ward has?  I want to hear those tapes as I have been hearing about them forever.

.

Me too.Rob says Greta has them!She probably won't play them until the Human trafficking angle plays out.JMOO


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #788 12/31/08 -
Post by: billb's daughter on January 01, 2009, 07:46:05 PM
Never any doubt in my mind that what was found in that trap were human remains. Natalee or not (I do think it was her), someone was in that cage/trap. No doubt ... right billb?   :cool:
I do as well. If the "remains" were not Natalee -- there would be no reason to be secretive or cover-up.
Nut, Wreck...I'm convinced there were remains in the cage primarily because of Tim Miller's reaction which prompted his 99.9% sure phone call to Dave. Then you add Kyle's own words here and on Freebirds, exposed by Kermit and backed up by multiple birdies...pretty convincing I'd say. I also strongly believe the remains are those of Natalee; otherwise, i think pos Mos were have revealed the contents of the cage..Hey, they could have explained away any other remains than Natalee was a result of an fishing boat accident involving a crew member or whatever else could reasonable fit the cage contents..
Some have suggested Kyle may have deliberately manipulated the secrecy behind the recovery efforts to promote his selling the photos for big bucks, but I think that's remote. I may be wrong of course, but as Janet likes to say: Logic dictates..........
JMHO..
To be clear. I DO believe Kyle tried to sell the photos.
edited....I keep typing to much! ::MonkeyWaa::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #788 12/31/08 -
Post by: Kermit on January 01, 2009, 07:47:07 PM
Did the Freebirds come up with an opinion based on their research of how the cage,and or Natalee got out there.I think you started to touch on it Kermit but don't remember if it was followed up on.The Gottenbo's??

Bump

I think the FACES of EVIL document lays out the timeline, which was if I remember correctly used by the RV Persistence at some point.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #788 12/31/08 -
Post by: Keepthefaith on January 01, 2009, 07:48:44 PM
Did the Freebirds come up with an opinion based on their research of how the cage,and or Natalee got out there.I think you started to touch on it Kermit but don't remember if it was followed up on.The Gottenbo's??

Bump

I think the FACES of EVIL document lays out the timeline, which was if I remember correctly used by the RV Persistence at some point.


Thanx.Will search for it!


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #788 12/31/08 -
Post by: wreck on January 01, 2009, 07:48:50 PM
Did the Freebirds come up with an opinion based on their research of how the cage,and or Natalee got out there.I think you started to touch on it Kermit but don't remember if it was followed up on.The Gottenbo's??

Bump

I think the FACES of EVIL document lays out the timeline, which was if I remember correctly used by the RV Persistence at some point.

refresh my memory on the "FOE" document, please


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #788 12/31/08 -
Post by: blah on January 01, 2009, 07:49:56 PM
OK, just for speculation, let's say Police Chief vdS is involved in hiring someone to dispose of remains.  The ones doing the disposal just happen to pick up his cap and toss it in the trap along with remains, etc. as insurance that he will never implicate them.

I know that is over-thinking but the thought has occurred to me many times.  Hard not to run wild with the things that could be.

.


There was never discussion of a cap.  There was blue denim-like fabric, and a blue tarp which was found outside the cage.


That "blue denim" looks more like a baseball type hat than a blue denim skirt


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #788 12/31/08 -
Post by: truthseeker2 on January 01, 2009, 07:51:11 PM
I have had a very interesting thought, but maybe some of you might think I've lost it.  Kermit said that she had IPs for Caps from Aruba, NY, and Paris.  This seems unusual to me for someone who John Silvetti claimed was unemployed.  Do you suppose that Caps could be some kind of an agent, like CIA or something?


So Caps had IP addresses from all of those locations?  Did not know that.  I don't spend that much time at the sitemeter.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #788 12/31/08 -
Post by: Anna on January 01, 2009, 07:51:20 PM
(http://i15.photobucket.com/albums/a360/AnnaBlueSkies/Holloway/polishatcompare.jpg)


Here you see the item I am calling a cap right under the chin of what would be the skull per Kyle's estimations.


(http://i15.photobucket.com/albums/a360/AnnaBlueSkies/Holloway/trap5.jpg)


But not important as it is only my opinion of what I see.  I guess we can all see different things but I do think this is the item in the plastic bag.  Now whether we saw ALL the evidence collected, we have no way of knowing but this does appear to me to be what was on the chest area and then is in the bag.  Maybe there is another bag with something taken from the skirt area that we were not shown.

.

.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #788 12/31/08 -
Post by: Kermit on January 01, 2009, 07:56:13 PM
Did the Freebirds come up with an opinion based on their research of how the cage,and or Natalee got out there.I think you started to touch on it Kermit but don't remember if it was followed up on.The Gottenbo's??

Bump

I think the FACES of EVIL document lays out the timeline, which was if I remember correctly used by the RV Persistence at some point.

refresh my memory on the "FOE" document, please

Here it is wreck:
http://nataleesfreebirds.blogspot.com/2007/10/in-face-of-evil-may-30-2005_19.html


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #788 12/31/08 -
Post by: Rob on January 01, 2009, 07:57:03 PM
(http://i127.photobucket.com/albums/p149/Morgan2112_2006/Privateeye-deminskirt3.jpg)

(http://i127.photobucket.com/albums/p149/Morgan2112_2006/Privateeye-deminskirt3.jpg)


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #788 12/31/08 -
Post by: Kermit on January 01, 2009, 07:57:21 PM
I have had a very interesting thought, but maybe some of you might think I've lost it.  Kermit said that she had IPs for Caps from Aruba, NY, and Paris.  This seems unusual to me for someone who John Silvetti claimed was unemployed.  Do you suppose that Caps could be some kind of an agent, like CIA or something?


So Caps had IP addresses from all of those locations?  Did not know that.  I don't spend that much time at the sitemeter.

He has different IPs, but he also uses more then one computer.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #788 12/31/08 -
Post by: Blonde on January 01, 2009, 07:57:24 PM
Kyle stated: "The Persistence had no divers on the 7th. Tim Trahan was our diver on the 30th-Dec, but he was out of the country at the time. The Aruban divers were on the police boat, dove from their boat, and returned to their boat.

Thankies Kerm!

I couldn't remember what Kyle had told us about where Trahan had gone.
Also
Wed 09-Jan 1816 hrs
All Internet connectivity was lost for two days due to rough seas and equipment failure. The old adage "No news is good news" only applies on land. Offshore, the 'Law of the Sea' rules and no news usually just means "lost contact". The seas were 6-8ft with the occasional 12+ft swell. The past two nights were spent conducting a bathymetry-only survey of the new grid. The new grid more than doubles the original search area. If completed, the total area thoroughly searched will be 80% the size of Aruba. Currently, the seas are calm relative to what we've been experiencing. The four digits posted on the echo-sounder is a reminder of the limits being put to the test.

Every body of water near land has its own unique character, temperament, and color. The nature of water is governed by the trio of land, sea, and sky. The sea surface reflects the sky, the water column contains the turbidity from the land, and the seabed stares upward through the water column as long as the water allows it to. However, as the seabed falls away into the abyss, the color is always the same dark navy blue. Staring into these deep and dark waters reminds me that this island is surrounded by the same water that flows throughout our entire world. On the surface, the expanse of the sea divides us. Looking deeper, it is really what connects us all. Perhaps the sea gives a reflection of human nature and not just the sky.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #788 12/31/08 -
Post by: Rob on January 01, 2009, 07:57:52 PM
(http://i127.photobucket.com/albums/p149/Morgan2112_2006/OErespondstoPE5.jpg)


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #788 12/31/08 -
Post by: Kermit on January 01, 2009, 07:58:19 PM
(http://i127.photobucket.com/albums/p149/Morgan2112_2006/Privateeye-deminskirt3.jpg)

(http://i127.photobucket.com/albums/p149/Morgan2112_2006/Privateeye-deminskirt3.jpg)

Yep, you were correct Rob.


Maybe winger can explain it.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #788 12/31/08 -
Post by: billb's daughter on January 01, 2009, 07:58:42 PM
Did the Freebirds come up with an opinion based on their research of how the cage,and or Natalee got out there.I think you started to touch on it Kermit but don't remember if it was followed up on.The Gottenbo's??

Bump

I think the FACES of EVIL document lays out the timeline, which was if I remember correctly used by the RV Persistence at some point.
Kermit...
Are you referring to the videos that were on SM?
http://scaredmonkeys.com/2007/10/18/natalee-holloway-in-the-face-of-evil-part-i/




Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #788 12/31/08 -
Post by: SS on January 01, 2009, 08:01:04 PM
I have had a very interesting thought, but maybe some of you might think I've lost it.  Kermit said that she had IPs for Caps from Aruba, NY, and Paris.  This seems unusual to me for someone who John Silvetti claimed was unemployed.  Do you suppose that Caps could be some kind of an agent, like CIA or something?


So Caps had IP addresses from all of those locations?  Did not know that.  I don't spend that much time at the sitemeter.

He has different IPs, but he also uses more then one computer.



Could he be some kind of a special agent?


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #788 12/31/08 -
Post by: blah on January 01, 2009, 08:03:08 PM
Never any doubt in my mind that what was found in that trap were human remains. Natalee or not (I do think it was her), someone was in that cage/trap. No doubt ... right billb?   :cool:
I do as well. If the "remains" were not Natalee -- there would be no reason to be secretive or cover-up.

I agree! 


Kyle referred to the contents as REMAINS.  Not once, not twice - but over and over and over.



oceanexploration
Re: Natalee Case Discussion #744 3/19 -
« Reply #363 on: March 20, 2008, 02:36:39 AM »

Kyle said: "Human remains were found, but the FBI was not and would not comment on the case.  The FBI did not comment on the remains, but rather the fabric sample"

Oceanexploration: "I never said there were no human remains"
http://scaredmonkeys.net/index.php?topic=2668.msg360330#msg360330


Kyle: "I think it is highly unlikely and completely inconsistent with numerous testimonies and other evidence that the pond (or anything but the ocean) contains Natalee's remains

« Reply #802 on: December 02, 2008, 05:16:26 PM »

Kyle said: “The portion of the discolored blue fabric was presumably on the bottom of the fabric. In my opinion this discoloration is not another type of fabric, but rather biological staining or discoloration from biological growth caused from a high organic carbon content and decay. Basically, during decay a biological mat will form around the organics from remains. This is what I believe it is on the bottom of the fabric.

http://scaredmonkeys.net/index.php?topic=4182.msg564125;topicseen#msg564125




Kermit,
You were going to reveal something yesterday, I dont even remember what is was but did you do it?  I dunno if I missed something or not.  Do you know what I'm talking about?


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #788 12/31/08 -
Post by: truthseeker2 on January 01, 2009, 08:03:33 PM
Anna, How ironic would it be if there were human remains down there, no matter whose, and the Aruban dive team knew who they belonged to and threw a cap in there to make sure they could implicate any ALE who decided to tell about it?

Well, maybe that is not ironic some much as it is outrageous, but, like I said earlier....this is Aruba we are talking about.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #788 12/31/08 -
Post by: Blonde on January 01, 2009, 08:03:33 PM
What is the cap thing to which you are referring? 

(http://i18.photobucket.com/albums/b104/Blondeonahd/persistence/bagat30.jpg)


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #788 12/31/08 -
Post by: wreck on January 01, 2009, 08:03:43 PM
Did the Freebirds come up with an opinion based on their research of how the cage,and or Natalee got out there.I think you started to touch on it Kermit but don't remember if it was followed up on.The Gottenbo's??

Bump

I think the FACES of EVIL document lays out the timeline, which was if I remember correctly used by the RV Persistence at some point.

refresh my memory on the "FOE" document, please

Here it is wreck:
http://nataleesfreebirds.blogspot.com/2007/10/in-face-of-evil-may-30-2005_19.html

Thanks!


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #788 12/31/08 -
Post by: texasmom on January 01, 2009, 08:04:01 PM
(http://i127.photobucket.com/albums/p149/Morgan2112_2006/Privateeye-deminskirt3.jpg)

(http://i127.photobucket.com/albums/p149/Morgan2112_2006/Privateeye-deminskirt3.jpg)

Thanks Rob!

That's what I was looking for this afternoon!   ::MonkeyDance::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #788 12/31/08 -
Post by: Keepthefaith on January 01, 2009, 08:04:36 PM
Never any doubt in my mind that what was found in that trap were human remains. Natalee or not (I do think it was her), someone was in that cage/trap. No doubt ... right billb?   :cool:
I do as well. If the "remains" were not Natalee -- there would be no reason to be secretive or cover-up.

I agree! 


Kyle referred to the contents as REMAINS.  Not once, not twice - but over and over and over.



oceanexploration
Re: Natalee Case Discussion #744 3/19 -
« Reply #363 on: March 20, 2008, 02:36:39 AM »

Kyle said: "Human remains were found, but the FBI was not and would not comment on the case.  The FBI did not comment on the remains, but rather the fabric sample"

Oceanexploration: "I never said there were no human remains"
http://scaredmonkeys.net/index.php?topic=2668.msg360330#msg360330


Kyle: "I think it is highly unlikely and completely inconsistent with numerous testimonies and other evidence that the pond (or anything but the ocean) contains Natalee's remains

« Reply #802 on: December 02, 2008, 05:16:26 PM »

Kyle said: “The portion of the discolored blue fabric was presumably on the bottom of the fabric. In my opinion this discoloration is not another type of fabric, but rather biological staining or discoloration from biological growth caused from a high organic carbon content and decay. Basically, during decay a biological mat will form around the organics from remains. This is what I believe it is on the bottom of the fabric.

http://scaredmonkeys.net/index.php?topic=4182.msg564125;topicseen#msg564125




Kermit,
You were going to reveal something yesterday, I dont even remember what is was but did you do it?  I dunno if I missed something or not.  Do you know what I'm talking about?

I believe it  was in regards to ldstlou and Kyle's communication?


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #788 12/31/08 -
Post by: truthseeker2 on January 01, 2009, 08:07:49 PM
I have had a very interesting thought, but maybe some of you might think I've lost it.  Kermit said that she had IPs for Caps from Aruba, NY, and Paris.  This seems unusual to me for someone who John Silvetti claimed was unemployed.  Do you suppose that Caps could be some kind of an agent, like CIA or something?


So Caps had IP addresses from all of those locations?  Did not know that.  I don't spend that much time at the sitemeter.

He has different IPs, but he also uses more then one computer.



Could he be some kind of a special agent?

I guess anything is possible.  Remember, there was a DEA agent there the very first day.  I think we were told he was 'vacationing'.  Who knows what we have down there, considering we have the FOB.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #788 12/31/08 -
Post by: Kermit on January 01, 2009, 08:08:10 PM
Never any doubt in my mind that what was found in that trap were human remains. Natalee or not (I do think it was her), someone was in that cage/trap. No doubt ... right billb?   :cool:
I do as well. If the "remains" were not Natalee -- there would be no reason to be secretive or cover-up.

I agree! 


Kyle referred to the contents as REMAINS.  Not once, not twice - but over and over and over.



oceanexploration
Re: Natalee Case Discussion #744 3/19 -
« Reply #363 on: March 20, 2008, 02:36:39 AM »

Kyle said: "Human remains were found, but the FBI was not and would not comment on the case.  The FBI did not comment on the remains, but rather the fabric sample"

Oceanexploration: "I never said there were no human remains"
http://scaredmonkeys.net/index.php?topic=2668.msg360330#msg360330


Kyle: "I think it is highly unlikely and completely inconsistent with numerous testimonies and other evidence that the pond (or anything but the ocean) contains Natalee's remains

« Reply #802 on: December 02, 2008, 05:16:26 PM »

Kyle said: “The portion of the discolored blue fabric was presumably on the bottom of the fabric. In my opinion this discoloration is not another type of fabric, but rather biological staining or discoloration from biological growth caused from a high organic carbon content and decay. Basically, during decay a biological mat will form around the organics from remains. This is what I believe it is on the bottom of the fabric.

http://scaredmonkeys.net/index.php?topic=4182.msg564125;topicseen#msg564125




Kermit,
You were going to reveal something yesterday, I dont even remember what is was but did you do it?  I dunno if I missed something or not.  Do you know what I'm talking about?

yes, but I'm sure it's either pages back or in the last thread.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #788 12/31/08 -
Post by: Kermit on January 01, 2009, 08:09:38 PM
I have had a very interesting thought, but maybe some of you might think I've lost it.  Kermit said that she had IPs for Caps from Aruba, NY, and Paris.  This seems unusual to me for someone who John Silvetti claimed was unemployed.  Do you suppose that Caps could be some kind of an agent, like CIA or something?


So Caps had IP addresses from all of those locations?  Did not know that.  I don't spend that much time at the sitemeter.

He has different IPs, but he also uses more then one computer.



Could he be some kind of a special agent?

I have 6 computers.
make that 7, I can log in with my phone.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #788 12/31/08 -
Post by: Kermit on January 01, 2009, 08:10:39 PM
I'm taking off.
Keep the faith.



Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #788 12/31/08 -
Post by: SS on January 01, 2009, 08:11:32 PM
I have had a very interesting thought, but maybe some of you might think I've lost it.  Kermit said that she had IPs for Caps from Aruba, NY, and Paris.  This seems unusual to me for someone who John Silvetti claimed was unemployed.  Do you suppose that Caps could be some kind of an agent, like CIA or something?


So Caps had IP addresses from all of those locations?  Did not know that.  I don't spend that much time at the sitemeter.

He has different IPs, but he also uses more then one computer.



Could he be some kind of a special agent?

I guess anything is possible.  Remember, there was a DEA agent there the very first day.  I think we were told he was 'vacationing'.  Who knows what we have down there, considering we have the FOB.



I don't know anything about Interpol, but do they have agents?


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #788 12/31/08 -
Post by: Anna on January 01, 2009, 08:12:08 PM
Long ago and far away, I did a lot of reverses on IP addresses especially when my computer would get hacked.  Routinely there was a connection through France for Aruba. 

Don't remember ever getting NY as one, however.  I think the France one came about through Setar from what I remember.  Lost it all when computer was crashed.

.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #788 12/31/08 -
Post by: Blonde on January 01, 2009, 08:12:42 PM
I have had a very interesting thought, but maybe some of you might think I've lost it.  Kermit said that she had IPs for Caps from Aruba, NY, and Paris.  This seems unusual to me for someone who John Silvetti claimed was unemployed.  Do you suppose that Caps could be some kind of an agent, like CIA or something?

Miss you SS,
My thoughts are he was using  a hide the IP  program.
I can come in her now looking like I live in China
I had this program and used it often a few years back.
I could pick anywhere but some ran faster then others
http://www.freedownloadscenter.com/Utilities/Misc__Utilities/Hide_IP.html


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #788 12/31/08 -
Post by: iris44 on January 01, 2009, 08:13:06 PM
Johan's post on the previous thread regarding the dive company from Rotterdam's analysis of the ROV pictures seems pretty convincing, but there has not been much discussion about it.  Does anyone else find their analysis  fairly convincing that there was no skull in the cage?  Maybe Kyle was scamming everyone and just trying to make money off selling the pics (which he knew were not a body) to the networks.  If that is true, that could be why he did not send the info to the family and the FBI.   Maybe the networks wouldn't buy the pics because they also new it was not a body.



Bingo!!

I've never seen one thing in that cage that looks like human remains to me.. I agree with you that "someone" could be trying to capitalize on a failed mission in the search for Natalee.

Well, what do you think this is?

(http://i272.photobucket.com/albums/jj176/bastibro/verwant/2345840954_e00aee9854_o.jpg)
(http://i272.photobucket.com/albums/jj176/bastibro/verwant/hip_socket.jpg)

I don't know what it is. Do you?

I think it looks a lot like a human ischium . .  ::MonkeyShocked::

If the cage is really only 2 1/2 feet tall, wouldn't the ischium be too small to be human, too, just like the skull?


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #788 12/31/08 -
Post by: blah on January 01, 2009, 08:13:26 PM
I believe it  was in regards to ldstlou and Kyle's communication?

possibly


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #788 12/31/08 -
Post by: Anna on January 01, 2009, 08:15:22 PM
I believe it  was in regards to ldstlou and Kyle's communication?

possibly

Happy New Year's Blah!

Just read back the last couple of threads and you are sure to find it, lol!

 ::MonkeyHaHa::




Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #788 12/31/08 -
Post by: klaasend on January 01, 2009, 08:16:15 PM
Did the Freebirds come up with an opinion based on their research of how the cage,and or Natalee got out there.I think you started to touch on it Kermit but don't remember if it was followed up on.The Gottenbo's??

Bump

I think the FACES of EVIL document lays out the timeline, which was if I remember correctly used by the RV Persistence at some point.


Faces of Evil - Part 1
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hDSSvwsGCGM

Part 2

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ij4hqxDr38U

Part 3

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=j8HcDGFWYsY

Part 4

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Eda9a3RJrww

Part 5

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HiVPbvOK9aU

Part 6

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FrB18h9OkXE



Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #788 12/31/08 -
Post by: SS on January 01, 2009, 08:18:52 PM
I have had a very interesting thought, but maybe some of you might think I've lost it.  Kermit said that she had IPs for Caps from Aruba, NY, and Paris.  This seems unusual to me for someone who John Silvetti claimed was unemployed.  Do you suppose that Caps could be some kind of an agent, like CIA or something?

Miss you SS,
My thoughts are he was using  a hide the IP  program.
I can come in her now looking like I live in China
I had this program and used it often a few years back.
I could pick anywhere but some ran faster then others
http://www.freedownloadscenter.com/Utilities/Misc__Utilities/Hide_IP.html



Thanks Blonde, I've missed you, too.  I don't know anything about sitemeters or IPs.  I tries to find myself on the SM meter once and I couldn't do it.  If he appeared about the same time as the first Peter de Vries program, do you think that he's working for someone or a government other than Aruba?


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #788 12/31/08 -
Post by: blah on January 01, 2009, 08:22:39 PM

yes, but I'm sure it's either pages back or in the last thread.


Could you repeat it or give a cliff notes version?


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #788 12/31/08 -
Post by: SS on January 01, 2009, 08:27:42 PM

yes, but I'm sure it's either pages back or in the last thread.


Could you repeat it or give a cliff notes version?



Kermit said that she would come back last night and burst a bubble.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #788 12/31/08 -
Post by: Tibrogargan on January 01, 2009, 08:29:37 PM

the glorification of Caps
(including providing protection for him)
by members of our community
was an orchestrated event lasting 12 months

and requires explanation

so, yah, a big frickin' deal



Hi Finn... Tibro and I questioned Caps' English in Shango along time ago. I asked many questions and was told to stop questioning everything that he posted. IIRC, I was even told to back up my posts...which in itself was a joke.

Hi Mum - Happy New Year.  At least we can beat you to that LOL as I am always hours behind in reading here.

I remember our questioning many times Caps use of English.

IIRC the only straight answer I ever got from Caps was when I asked him if he was on Aruba at the time of Natalee's disappearance and he answered NO.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #788 12/31/08 -
Post by: texasmom on January 01, 2009, 08:30:03 PM

yes, but I'm sure it's either pages back or in the last thread.


Could you repeat it or give a cliff notes version?

I think this may be it blah:

http://scaredmonkeys.net/index.php?topic=4269.700


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #788 12/31/08 -
Post by: Magnolia on January 01, 2009, 08:32:03 PM
Kermit got the information together quicker than anticipated.
It was posted night before last.
You can find it.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #788 12/31/08 -
Post by: Keepthefaith on January 01, 2009, 08:32:25 PM

yes, but I'm sure it's either pages back or in the last thread.


Could you repeat it or give a cliff notes version?



Kermit said that she would come back last night and burst a bubble.

No.

I'll put it all together so it will open everyone's eyes as to why Idstlou is behaving and asking what she is.
Believe me, it's all because of the information she has been fed.

I do not know Idstlou and certainly have no intention to hurt her feelings when I burst the bubble.
That's my disclaimer so she knows ahead of time. She said she wanted to know the truth and she is only getting what someone wants her to know.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #788 12/31/08 -
Post by: Keepthefaith on January 01, 2009, 08:35:45 PM
Kermit got the information together quicker than anticipated.
It was posted night before last.
You can find it.

So who is feeding Ldstlou her information Mags?


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #788 12/31/08 -
Post by: blah on January 01, 2009, 08:36:28 PM

Happy New Year's Blah!

Just read back the last couple of threads and you are sure to find it, lol!

 ::MonkeyHaHa::




Happy New Year Anna!!!

Guess i'll never know as I aint reading back and that damn frog left!!!
 ::MonkeyLaugh::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #788 12/31/08 -
Post by: Blue Moon on January 01, 2009, 08:39:47 PM
Was the trap something the crew of the ship had NOT intended to come upon?  Seems to me if they were there under the guise of oil then coming upon the cage was not on their agenda.  This would put them in an awful situation when Tim Miller had already seen what he thought was a skull and ABC being onboard.  Would this have sent them reeling when it all unfolded? 

Was Caps sent to SM to get us off the subject of the pictures and the contents of the trap?  Personally I believe he was.  I think Kyle couldn't control us from the questions we were asking and had to do something (or better yet John Silvetti) to stop the focus and questions on the cage.  It does appear to have worked at the time as we were all reluctant to continue with the discussion.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #788 12/31/08 -
Post by: texasmom on January 01, 2009, 08:40:20 PM

Happy New Year's Blah!

Just read back the last couple of threads and you are sure to find it, lol!

 ::MonkeyHaHa::




I posted a link for you blah up above, here it is again...

http://scaredmonkeys.net/index.php?topic=4269.700



Happy New Year Anna!!!

Guess i'll never know as I aint reading back and that damn frog left!!!
 ::MonkeyLaugh::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #788 12/31/08 -
Post by: wreck on January 01, 2009, 08:40:21 PM
Kermit got the information together quicker than anticipated.
It was posted night before last.
You can find it.

So who is feeding Ldstlou her information Mags?

Here is an excerpt from kermit's post:

Quote
WHO IS DEFENDING KYLE AND CAPS?/b]

Now, if we remember Kathy Drenga (Hotshot)  - she is the one that went to Aruba with BestBuddy & uploaded the Aru-bay videos to her website and the photos of the Lions Den. THEN she is the one that felt Natalee was buried in the cometary. THEN she thought she was in the BAG that Blonde found and that photo was seen in National Enquirer. THEN Kathy Drenga (Hotshot) started talking with Kyle and also CAPS.

as I'm reading back through ALL her posts, I'm see a picture. She is FEEDING CAPS information.That is why we see CAPS post she is in the MOKO (Kathy posted about the MOKO too), then he changes it to Montajan then the cemetery etc etc.

She sets it up for CAPS to go meet John Silvetti after contacting Kyle and from there CAPS story changes like the wind just like hers.

#902 on: July 11, 2006, 05:39:05 PM Hotshot:
I just feel those ponds that "WONT" be searched is a place that needs to be.  They know they cant drain them, too much water, and they know they cant dive them, too murky.  They are not dumb, but like to play dumb.  Don't forget they got a hit with the dogs at one, but couldn't do anything about it
http://scaredmonkeys.net/index.php?topic=63.msg13147#msg13147

REMEMBER THIS:
CAPS  CLAIMS THIS POND CONTAINS A TENNIS SHOE AND HUMAN REMAINS SPECIAL NOTE - ACCORDING TO DAVE HOLLOWAY, CAPS WITNESS HAS MET WITH JOHN SILVETTI OF THE PERSISTENCE BY NOW

Hotshot:
Don't know, but that mud would eat his shoes for sure.
http://scaredmonkeys.net/index.php?topic=164.msg31737#msg31737


Hotshot: “You guys are going to look really silly in the end for downing the people like silvetti, and Kyle, and CAPS.”
http://scaredmonkeys.net/index.php?topic=4186.msg565899#msg565899


Idstlou

213 on: September 22, 2008, 10:04:02 AM   ldstlou
Lalas!!! Our friend just called you back and you didn't answer!!! lol
Can you call him back now.
http://scaredmonkeys.net/index.php?topic=3390.200
 
lalasmom
 #231 on: September 22, 2008, 11:25:48 AM   lalasmom
Sorry!!  So sorry!! LOL  Will do...give me a minute...I was talking to my kid.  Sorry!
http://scaredmonkeys.net/index.php?topic=3390.220
 
 
#410 on: September 23, 2008, 08:56:12 AM   ldstlou
Lalas!! your phone is ringing!!   

trying to caaaaall you!!! lol
http://scaredmonkeys.net/index.php?topic=3390.msg467158#msg467158
 
413 on: September 23, 2008, 09:03:27 AM  lalassmom
No it's not!  LOL  Try again.
http://scaredmonkeys.net/index.php?topic=3390.msg467158#msg467158
 
 
#344 on: September 22, 2008, 09:20:45 PM   lalasmom
So Tim Miller and John Silvetti are the ones that made arrangements for Caps witness to come to the USA and take the polygraph.  Mos was a bit upset.  Why am I not surprised?
http://scaredmonkeys.net/index.php?topic=3390.340

lalas here/attachment/don't delete
Thursday, January 31, 2008 8:16 AM
Capslockwizard info.
[Note: This was the email to Dave Holloway]


Yapperz
 #476 on: Today at 10:18:37 PM  yapperz
Tamikosmom posted:
<snip>
Yap ... do you have information to the contrary.

Janet

______


Janet, actually I do. I would rather not go in to it here. You are welcome to get my email address from Klaas.
 


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #788 12/31/08 -
Post by: Magnolia on January 01, 2009, 08:40:26 PM
Kermit got the information together quicker than anticipated.
It was posted night before last.
You can find it.

So who is feeding Ldstlou her information Mags?

IMO it is Kyle.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #788 12/31/08 -
Post by: texasmom on January 01, 2009, 08:41:19 PM

Happy New Year's Blah!

Just read back the last couple of threads and you are sure to find it, lol!

 ::MonkeyHaHa::






Happy New Year Anna!!!

Guess i'll never know as I aint reading back and that damn frog left!!!
 ::MonkeyLaugh::


I posted a link for you blah up above, here it is again...

http://scaredmonkeys.net/index.php?topic=4269.700



Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #788 12/31/08 -
Post by: blah on January 01, 2009, 08:41:50 PM

yes, but I'm sure it's either pages back or in the last thread.


Could you repeat it or give a cliff notes version?

I think this may be it blah:

http://scaredmonkeys.net/index.php?topic=4269.700

Thanks TM, i'll skim through it


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #788 12/31/08 -
Post by: Keepthefaith on January 01, 2009, 08:42:50 PM
Kermit got the information together quicker than anticipated.
It was posted night before last.
You can find it.

So who is feeding Ldstlou her information Mags?

IMO it is Kyle.

OK.That was the dumbest question i've asked.. ::MonkeyConfused:: Sorry


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #788 12/31/08 -
Post by: Keepthefaith on January 01, 2009, 08:47:20 PM
How'd HotShot come to be involved in this thing from the beginning?Does she work with missing people,LE,an attorney??


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #788 12/31/08 -
Post by: Anna on January 01, 2009, 08:49:22 PM
Caps is not the only poster whose command of the language varies hugely from time to time.

 ::MonkeyRoll::



Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #788 12/31/08 -
Post by: blah on January 01, 2009, 08:49:43 PM
How'd HotShot come to be involved in this thing from the beginning?Does she work with missing people,LE,an attorney??

As far as I remember (and I could be wrong cuz my memory sux)  She was just another poster here who went to Aruba to do a sort of amature - under the radar investigation


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #788 12/31/08 -
Post by: bastibro on January 01, 2009, 08:49:54 PM
Johan's post on the previous thread regarding the dive company from Rotterdam's analysis of the ROV pictures seems pretty convincing, but there has not been much discussion about it.  Does anyone else find their analysis  fairly convincing that there was no skull in the cage?  Maybe Kyle was scamming everyone and just trying to make money off selling the pics (which he knew were not a body) to the networks.  If that is true, that could be why he did not send the info to the family and the FBI.   Maybe the networks wouldn't buy the pics because they also new it was not a body.



Bingo!!

I've never seen one thing in that cage that looks like human remains to me.. I agree with you that "someone" could be trying to capitalize on a failed mission in the search for Natalee.

Well, what do you think this is?

(http://i272.photobucket.com/albums/jj176/bastibro/verwant/2345840954_e00aee9854_o.jpg)
(http://i272.photobucket.com/albums/jj176/bastibro/verwant/hip_socket.jpg)

I don't know what it is. Do you?

I think it looks a lot like a human ischium . .  ::MonkeyShocked::

If the cage is really only 2 1/2 feet tall, wouldn't the ischium be too small to be human, too, just like the skull?

no, I have calculated that the measure would apply proportionally.
The ischium in the cage is around 3.3 inches(8.4 cm)


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #788 12/31/08 -
Post by: Keepthefaith on January 01, 2009, 08:51:23 PM
Caps is not the only poster whose command of the language varies hugely from time to time.

 ::MonkeyRoll::



This for me Anna??


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #788 12/31/08 -
Post by: blah on January 01, 2009, 08:51:31 PM

Happy New Year's Blah!

Just read back the last couple of threads and you are sure to find it, lol!

 ::MonkeyHaHa::






Happy New Year Anna!!!

Guess i'll never know as I aint reading back and that damn frog left!!!
 ::MonkeyLaugh::


I posted a link for you blah up above, here it is again...

http://scaredmonkeys.net/index.php?topic=4269.700



after skimming through this I think half the people who used to post here have lost their minds or something  ::MonkeyNoNo::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #788 12/31/08 -
Post by: Anna on January 01, 2009, 08:52:10 PM
Caps is not the only poster whose command of the language varies hugely from time to time.

 ::MonkeyRoll::



This for me Anna??


No.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #788 12/31/08 -
Post by: Anna on January 01, 2009, 08:53:54 PM
One thing I will have to say on behalf of Kyle is that he had a beautiful command of the language and was extremely articulate and even poetic in his use of it.

Most of us are not so talented in that regard.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #788 12/31/08 -
Post by: Keepthefaith on January 01, 2009, 08:56:30 PM
How'd HotShot come to be involved in this thing from the beginning?Does she work with missing people,LE,an attorney??

As far as I remember (and I could be wrong cuz my memory sux)  She was just another poster here who went to Aruba to do a sort of amature - under the radar investigation


So she just chose to go to Aruba on her own and investigate this missing person with absolutely no LE background?Was she asked to go down there by the Holloway's,Jug or any LE?


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #788 12/31/08 -
Post by: Edward on January 01, 2009, 08:59:15 PM
Heck half the BFN members did the same thing.. They were all running around on there own private investigation unauthorized of course as it should be.  ::MonkeyCool::
I am proud of them..
I wonder what ever happened to Opus..  ::MonkeyWink::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #788 12/31/08 -
Post by: Blue Moon on January 01, 2009, 09:01:33 PM

Happy New Year's Blah!

Just read back the last couple of threads and you are sure to find it, lol!

 ::MonkeyHaHa::






Happy New Year Anna!!!

Guess i'll never know as I aint reading back and that damn frog left!!!
 ::MonkeyLaugh::


I posted a link for you blah up above, here it is again...

http://scaredmonkeys.net/index.php?topic=4269.700



after skimming through this I think half the people who used to post here have lost their minds or something  ::MonkeyNoNo::

Blah, the same ones have disrupted the Caylee thread also.  So it doesn't just happen here.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #788 12/31/08 -
Post by: klaasend on January 01, 2009, 09:02:00 PM
Caps is not the only poster whose command of the language varies hugely from time to time.

 ::MonkeyRoll::



Who?


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #788 12/31/08 -
Post by: blah on January 01, 2009, 09:04:00 PM
How'd HotShot come to be involved in this thing from the beginning?Does she work with missing people,LE,an attorney??

As far as I remember (and I could be wrong cuz my memory sux)  She was just another poster here who went to Aruba to do a sort of amature - under the radar investigation


So she just chose to go to Aruba on her own and investigate this missing person with absolutely no LE background?Was she asked to go down there by the Holloway's,Jug or any LE?

not that I remember


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #788 12/31/08 -
Post by: Blonde on January 01, 2009, 09:06:21 PM
How'd HotShot come to be involved in this thing from the beginning?Does she work with missing people,LE,an attorney??

Hot shot started in June 2005 she went to Aruba a few times to look for Natalee on her own and then met up with a few friends
She has called Tim Miller  and asked it help in the search for Natalee and then started her own web site Aruba silence I think
 she goes to all the events and is very dedicated  to help find natalee


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #788 12/31/08 -
Post by: Keepthefaith on January 01, 2009, 09:06:57 PM
How'd HotShot come to be involved in this thing from the beginning?Does she work with missing people,LE,an attorney??

As far as I remember (and I could be wrong cuz my memory sux)  She was just another poster here who went to Aruba to do a sort of amature - under the radar investigation


So she just chose to go to Aruba on her own and investigate this missing person with absolutely no LE background?Was she asked to go down there by the Holloway's,Jug or any LE?

not that I remember

Maybe if she jumps back on she can give me the background!Only if she cares to.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #788 12/31/08 -
Post by: Keepthefaith on January 01, 2009, 09:10:31 PM
How'd HotShot come to be involved in this thing from the beginning?Does she work with missing people,LE,an attorney??

Hot shot started in June 2005 she went to Aruba a few times to look for Natalee on her own and then met up with a few friends
She has called Tim Miller  and asked it help in the search for Natalee and then started her own web site Aruba silence I think
 she goes to all the events and is very decated to help find natalee


Thanx Blonde!As i started on here about a year ago.I would just like to know the background in terms of Hotshot as well as Ldstlou.They seem to be very close to Kyle.They seem to be able to talk on their behalf so freely.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #788 12/31/08 -
Post by: blah on January 01, 2009, 09:11:20 PM
She did a pretty damn good job when she went


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #788 12/31/08 -
Post by: klaasend on January 01, 2009, 09:12:59 PM
Please don't take this wrong but wanting to help and having your heart in the right place does not qualify anyone to be an investigator in a missing persons case OTHER than to attempt to research online as most of us are doing here.  When we think we have found something the best thing WE can do is forward that information to the proper authorities.  MOO


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #788 12/31/08 -
Post by: Keepthefaith on January 01, 2009, 09:14:46 PM
Caps is not the only poster whose command of the language varies hugely from time to time.

 ::MonkeyRoll::



Who?

Bump


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #788 12/31/08 -
Post by: Blonde on January 01, 2009, 09:15:25 PM
How'd HotShot come to be involved in this thing from the beginning?Does she work with missing people,LE,an attorney??

Hot shot started in June 2005 she went to Aruba a few times to look for Natalee on her own and then met up with a few friends
She has called Tim Miller  and asked it help in the search for Natalee and then started her own web site Aruba silence I think
 she goes to all the events and is very decated to help find natalee


Thanx Blonde!As i started on here about a year ago.I would just like to know the background in terms of Hotshot as well as Ldstlou.They seem to be very close to Kyle.They seem to be able to talk on their behalf so freely.
  Hot Shot likes to talk to Joran on messenger ::MonkeyShocked::  she goes for the underdog type people but it all for natalee, she really is a nice person.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #788 12/31/08 -
Post by: San on January 01, 2009, 09:16:30 PM
(http://i34.photobucket.com/albums/d118/Sanddrops/Scared%20Monkeys/LOCKED2.gif)

Natalee Case Discussion #789

http://scaredmonkeys.net/index.php?topic=4340.0