Scared Monkeys Discussion Forum

Natalee Holloway => LCD Archive => Topic started by: Nut44x4 on January 01, 2009, 07:14:39 PM



Title: Natalee Case Discussion #789 1/1/09 - 1/3/09
Post by: Nut44x4 on January 01, 2009, 07:14:39 PM
http://i118.photobucket.com/albums/o100/klaasen3/Sub3/Natalee2.swf



JUSTICE FOR NATALEE in 2009!!!!!!!


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #789
Post by: texasmom on January 01, 2009, 09:18:52 PM
Anna,

.....Finbar?


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #789
Post by: Anna on January 01, 2009, 09:18:52 PM
Robots would have already been first!


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #789
Post by: Edward on January 01, 2009, 09:19:01 PM
you would not have the Chicago video if unqualified did not joint the search unathorized. and a lot of other info.
newscasters do not count as qualified also. ::MonkeyWink::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #789
Post by: Blonde on January 01, 2009, 09:19:08 PM
Caps I see that your on, and in Aruba tonight,  help us understand.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #789
Post by: klaasend on January 01, 2009, 09:19:31 PM
How'd HotShot come to be involved in this thing from the beginning?Does she work with missing people,LE,an attorney??

Hot shot started in June 2005 she went to Aruba a few times to look for Natalee on her own and then met up with a few friends
She has called Tim Miller  and asked it help in the search for Natalee and then started her own web site Aruba silence I think
 she goes to all the events and is very decated to help find natalee


Thanx Blonde!As i started on here about a year ago.I would just like to know the background in terms of Hotshot as well as Ldstlou.They seem to be very close to Kyle.They seem to be able to talk on their behalf so freely.
  Hot Shot likes to talk to Joran on messenger ::MonkeyShocked::  she goes for the underdog type people but it all for natalee, she really is a nice person.

Maybe naive?  I don't see where talking with Joran, Steve Croes, Kawish, etc etc has gotten anyone anywhere.  I do agree she only wants to help. 


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #789
Post by: Anna on January 01, 2009, 09:20:26 PM
Anna,

.....Finbar?


Caps is not the only poster whose command of the language varies hugely from time to time.

 ::MonkeyRoll::



Who?

Bump


Oh, don't mind me.  Apparently my imagination is too vivid but it did seem that ld waxed far more eloquent in her defense of Kyle than normally.  I wondered if he was directly dictating what she would say in his defense.  Just didn't sound much like her to me.

jmoo


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #789
Post by: texasmom on January 01, 2009, 09:21:47 PM
Anna,

.....Finbar?


Caps is not the only poster whose command of the language varies hugely from time to time.

 ::MonkeyRoll::



Who?

Bump


Oh, don't mind me.  Apparently my imagination is too vivid but it did seem that ld waxed far more eloquent in her defense of Kyle than normally.  I wondered if he was directly dictating what she would say in his defense.  Just didn't sound much like her to me.

jmoo

 ::MonkeyHaHa::  Oh yes, I remember now!


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #789
Post by: Keepthefaith on January 01, 2009, 09:22:35 PM
How'd HotShot come to be involved in this thing from the beginning?Does she work with missing people,LE,an attorney??

Hot shot started in June 2005 she went to Aruba a few times to look for Natalee on her own and then met up with a few friends
She has called Tim Miller  and asked it help in the search for Natalee and then started her own web site Aruba silence I think
 she goes to all the events and is very decated to help find natalee


Thanx Blonde!As i started on here about a year ago.I would just like to know the background in terms of Hotshot as well as Ldstlou.They seem to be very close to Kyle.They seem to be able to talk on their behalf so freely.
  Hot Shot likes to talk to Joran on messenger ::MonkeyShocked::  she goes for the underdog type people but it all for natalee, she really is a nice person.

Maybe naive?  I don't see where talking with Joran, Steve Croes, Kawish, etc etc has gotten anyone anywhere.  I do agree she only wants to help. 

So where does ldstlou fit into this?These maybe repetitive questions but would like to understand where they are coming from in terms of Kyle.TIA


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #789
Post by: klaasend on January 01, 2009, 09:23:51 PM
you would not have the Chicago video if unqualified did not joint the search unathorized. and a lot of other info.
newscasters do not count as qualified also. ::MonkeyWink::

HUH?  First off they are not the "Chicago videos".  Poster Chicago_510 simply uploaded the Aru-bay videos onto google videos. 

The index of images still exists for the original Aru-bay site and the videos are all there.  That is exactly what I'm talking about.  Locating stuff like this online and making it known and researching aspects of it is what we CAN do.  The Aru-bay videos were sent to the family investigators way back in August 2005 along with information on Paul Brough aka Mr. Pink.  I personally sent it but others may have sent as well. 

http://www.aru-bay.com/images/


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #789
Post by: Anna on January 01, 2009, 09:25:57 PM
It is strange how the bungled fish trap investigation and the pond became merged. 

Is there something right before us that we are missing about all this?


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #789
Post by: Anna on January 01, 2009, 09:28:49 PM
Anna,

.....Finbar?


Caps is not the only poster whose command of the language varies hugely from time to time.

 ::MonkeyRoll::



Who?

Bump


Oh, don't mind me.  Apparently my imagination is too vivid but it did seem that ld waxed far more eloquent in her defense of Kyle than normally.  I wondered if he was directly dictating what she would say in his defense.  Just didn't sound much like her to me.

jmoo

 ::MonkeyHaHa::  Oh yes, I remember now!

Well, I am glad at least someone else noticed this.  Was suddenly like she was channeling Kyle to me.  Long paragraphs, sentence structure, etc.  Just different.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #789
Post by: texasmom on January 01, 2009, 09:31:02 PM
Does anyone have an idea at what point in the ocean search that the detective and his brother met with the Persistence crew?  I'm curious as to if it was before the search began...or at what point?


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #789
Post by: klaasend on January 01, 2009, 09:32:37 PM
Does anyone have an idea at what point in the ocean search that the detective and his brother met with the Persistence crew?  I'm curious as to if it was before the search began...or at what point?

It was towards the end, after the trap was located I believe.  January or February 2008.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #789
Post by: Blue Moon on January 01, 2009, 09:34:36 PM
you would not have the Chicago video if unqualified did not joint the search unathorized. and a lot of other info.
newscasters do not count as qualified also. ::MonkeyWink::

HUH?  First off they are not the "Chicago videos".  Poster Chicago_510 simply uploaded the Aru-bay videos onto google videos. 

The index of images still exists for the original Aru-bay site and the videos are all there.  That is exactly what I'm talking about.  Locating stuff like this online and making it known and researching aspects of it is what we CAN do.  The Aru-bay videos were sent to the family investigators way back in August 2005 along with information on Paul Brough aka Mr. Pink.  I personally sent it but others may have sent as well. 

http://www.aru-bay.com/images/

Klaas, I have to agree with you on inserting yourself in an on-going murder investigation.  I think the number of well-meaning people out there that did exactly as hotshot did (and no I am not bashing her-I feel she really does great things for Natalee and her family) probably complicated the goings-on in Aruba and put them more at odds with the family members.  I know Beth and Dave are appreciative of all help they received but sometimes it probably did more harm than good with the relationship between Aruba and Natalee's family.  (JMO)


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #789
Post by: texasmom on January 01, 2009, 09:36:06 PM
Does anyone have an idea at what point in the ocean search that the detective and his brother met with the Persistence crew?  I'm curious as to if it was before the search began...or at what point?

It was towards the end, after the trap was located I believe.  January or February 2008.

Thanks Klaas!


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #789
Post by: MumInOhio on January 01, 2009, 09:37:16 PM
Hi Tib...Happy New Year to you as well...Will switch our weather for a week or two!

SS......I have 2 different IPs on the same page of a thread in this Forum. I think I have a screen capture, if not I will make sure I do it. I also use more than one computer, so I have absolutely no idea what point Kermit has been trying to make. Especially now she professes to use 7...Oh...I guess she is now CIA, FBI or something... ::MonkeyWaa::

Remember ALE is watching. FBI too.  ::MonkeyEek::

Click on my profile and you can see a post of mine this morning about Caps posting from Aruba. It seems I was tracking Caps long before either Kermit and Jen, and Yes he was posting from Aruba. I have a heap of them saved.

By my calculations I have managed to squeeze in before all the "devices".  ::MonkeyWink::





Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #789
Post by: Anna on January 01, 2009, 09:38:58 PM
Does anyone have an idea at what point in the ocean search that the detective and his brother met with the Persistence crew?  I'm curious as to if it was before the search began...or at what point?

It was towards the end, after the trap was located I believe.  January or February 2008.

Thanks Klaas!

So after the contents of the fish trap were removed by ALE?



Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #789
Post by: klaasend on January 01, 2009, 09:41:05 PM
Does anyone have an idea at what point in the ocean search that the detective and his brother met with the Persistence crew?  I'm curious as to if it was before the search began...or at what point?

It was towards the end, after the trap was located I believe.  January or February 2008.

Thanks Klaas!

So after the contents of the fish trap were removed by ALE?



Anna I'm not sure about that because we didn't find out until later that ALE removed the contents of the trap.  I could search and try and find the exact day or week.  I do believe it was AFTER ALE removed the contents though, after January 7.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #789
Post by: Anna on January 01, 2009, 09:42:46 PM
Well, it's in that last long post by Kermit.  I can just trot back in the last thread and see.



Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #789
Post by: MumInOhio on January 01, 2009, 09:43:04 PM
Oops...Hi Caps...But you knew I was watching, didn't you?


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #789
Post by: MuffyBee on January 01, 2009, 09:43:58 PM
There are 4 desktops, 3 laptops and a hand held computer at my house, and I'm not CIA, MUM.  That gives me 8, one more than Kermit.  I usually use my desk top, but can and have used any of them in the house.  And if I did outside employment, there could be another computer.  Just sayin'...What is so unbelievable about having multiple computers in this day and age?


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #789
Post by: finngirl on January 01, 2009, 09:44:33 PM

blonde:

when you come back
could you post the photo of finbar
w/ his bro?

IIRC fin is the good-looking one

(tried search function but couldn't find photo)

TIA



Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #789
Post by: Magnolia on January 01, 2009, 09:44:47 PM
I had a thought...doesn't happen often. ::MonkeyHaHa::

When Mos arrested J2K again in Nov, 2007, he said that
he could charge the Ks with at least body disposal or disposal
of human reamins.

Since Kyle stated many times that human remains were found,
could ALE be made to produce those remains for testing.
If they can't or won't produce any remains, could they be
charged with body disposal or disposal of human remains?

At least it would be a starting place.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #789
Post by: MumInOhio on January 01, 2009, 09:49:15 PM
There are 4 desktops, 3 laptops and a hand held computer at my house, and I'm not CIA, MUM.  That gives me 8, one more than Kermit.  I usually use my desk top, but can and have used any of them in the house.  And if I did outside employment, there could be another computer.  Just sayin'...What is so unbelievable about having multiple computers in this day and age?

Hi Muffy...Absolutely nothing, which is why I can't understand why Kermit kept posting that Caps uses more than one computer.

Good Night it is way late for me...


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #789
Post by: Keepthefaith on January 01, 2009, 09:50:24 PM
There are 4 desktops, 3 laptops and a hand held computer at my house, and I'm not CIA, MUM.  That gives me 8, one more than Kermit.  I usually use my desk top, but can and have used any of them in the house.  And if I did outside employment, there could be another computer.  Just sayin'...What is so unbelievable about having multiple computers in this day and age?

Hi Muffy...Absolutely nothing, which is why I can't understand why Kermit kept posting that Caps uses more than one computer.

Good Night it is way late for me...

Goodnight Mum.Hope you caught my last post!


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #789
Post by: Poochy on January 01, 2009, 09:54:55 PM
you would not have the Chicago video if unqualified did not joint the search unathorized. and a lot of other info.
newscasters do not count as qualified also. ::MonkeyWink::

HUH?  First off they are not the "Chicago videos".  Poster Chicago_510 simply uploaded the Aru-bay videos onto google videos. 

The index of images still exists for the original Aru-bay site and the videos are all there.  That is exactly what I'm talking about.  Locating stuff like this online and making it known and researching aspects of it is what we CAN do.  The Aru-bay videos were sent to the family investigators way back in August 2005 along with information on Paul Brough aka Mr. Pink.  I personally sent it but others may have sent as well. 

http://www.aru-bay.com/images/

Just logged in tonight and have many prev. pages to read, but started w/this page.

I agree Klass, the Aru-bay video site was where all the videos were housed. They were not the 'Chicago510' videos - Poster Chicago510 merely took the vids fronm the aru-bay site and uploaded them. He once told me he wished he kept the original names that were on that site. I had them on my other computer which crashed a few yrs ago. 

However I was asked by the 'family' to do a synopsis of what I felt the videos meant-- from the music, the landscape, etc, and even the order in which they were filmed. I will dig out that info I sent to them via email and post here eventually or send to Blonde for perhaps a potential new thread.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #789
Post by: MuffyBee on January 01, 2009, 09:55:21 PM
There are 4 desktops, 3 laptops and a hand held computer at my house, and I'm not CIA, MUM.  That gives me 8, one more than Kermit.  I usually use my desk top, but can and have used any of them in the house.  And if I did outside employment, there could be another computer.  Just sayin'...What is so unbelievable about having multiple computers in this day and age?

Hi Muffy...Absolutely nothing, which is why I can't understand why Kermit kept posting that Caps uses more than one computer.

Good Night it is way late for me...

Good night Mum, and thank you for your reply.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #789
Post by: Anna on January 01, 2009, 09:57:12 PM
Well, it's in that last long post by Kermit.  I can just trot back in the last thread and see.



OK, I think this gives us a rough time frame.  This is from Kermit's post:


KEEP REMEMBERING THAT THIS WITNESS OF CAPS HAS BY NOW MET WITH JOHN SILVETTI

February 29, 2008

MARCH 3, 2008 – John Silvetti meets with CapsLockWizard

From an email sent from CapsLockWizard:
“Yes, We did have the meeting today. It was a long meeting and we are all set to start the process of a permit to drain. Witness will gave statement to Lawyer (Helen), Lawyer will motion to drain the pond to OM. If Motion denied, will go to media and expose more dirt. John knows everything now and he will stay behind to help and protect. John state the cage was empty. it was full of these broken plastic bags that shows on the cam like skull, but he said to me it is the water doing tricks when picture was taken. He thinks also it is a postoffice.

--snip--------

John did go back to work with CAPS 2 times that I know of, to Aruba, about the Monstart pond.  He was with CAPS the whole time
http://scaredmonkeys.net/index.php?topic=4173.msg555976#msg555976



http://scaredmonkeys.net/index.php?topic=4269.700

------------


Of course, Caps could tell us exactly.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #789
Post by: klaasend on January 01, 2009, 09:59:19 PM
you would not have the Chicago video if unqualified did not joint the search unathorized. and a lot of other info.
newscasters do not count as qualified also. ::MonkeyWink::

HUH?  First off they are not the "Chicago videos".  Poster Chicago_510 simply uploaded the Aru-bay videos onto google videos. 

The index of images still exists for the original Aru-bay site and the videos are all there.  That is exactly what I'm talking about.  Locating stuff like this online and making it known and researching aspects of it is what we CAN do.  The Aru-bay videos were sent to the family investigators way back in August 2005 along with information on Paul Brough aka Mr. Pink.  I personally sent it but others may have sent as well. 

http://www.aru-bay.com/images/

Just logged in tonight and have many prev. pages to read, but started w/this page.

I agree Klass, the Aru-bay video site was where all the videos were housed. They were not the 'Chicago510' videos - Poster Chicago510 merely took the vids fronm the aru-bay site and uploaded them. He once told me he wished he kept the original names that were on that site. I had them on my other computer which crashed a few yrs ago. 

However I was asked by the 'family' to do a synopsis of what I felt the videos meant-- from the music, the landscape, etc, and even the order in which they were filmed. I will dig out that info I sent to them via email and post here eventually or send to Blonde for perhaps a potential new thread.

Hi Poochy - I have them all saved and on 2 PC's and also on CD.   Yes, even several of the videos prior to when Natalee was in Aruba were very interresting indeed, especially the 2 filmed on Tattoo.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #789
Post by: bastibro on January 01, 2009, 10:04:50 PM
It is strange how the bungled fish trap investigation and the pond became merged. 

Is there something right before us that we are missing about all this?

BUMP

There is no connection IMHO  ::MonkeyNoNo::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #789
Post by: wreck on January 01, 2009, 10:08:34 PM
It is strange how the bungled fish trap investigation and the pond became merged. 

Is there something right before us that we are missing about all this?

BUMP

There is no connection IMHO  ::MonkeyNoNo::
I think they ARE linked. The pond was a diversion for what was really found in the cage. The pond was the VERY last thing searched by the Persitence crew. Did they purposely plant the cage evidence in the pond????


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #789
Post by: Keepthefaith on January 01, 2009, 10:19:02 PM
Why such a strong opposition to the Cage and the Persistence??I'm still not understanding from Kyle's own words how people are not concerned?What is the problem?Someone please enlighten................. ::MonkeyCool::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #789
Post by: iris44 on January 01, 2009, 10:22:08 PM
How'd HotShot come to be involved in this thing from the beginning?Does she work with missing people,LE,an attorney??

Hot shot started in June 2005 she went to Aruba a few times to look for Natalee on her own and then met up with a few friends
She has called Tim Miller  and asked it help in the search for Natalee and then started her own web site Aruba silence I think
 she goes to all the events and is very decated to help find natalee


Thanx Blonde!As i started on here about a year ago.I would just like to know the background in terms of Hotshot as well as Ldstlou.They seem to be very close to Kyle.They seem to be able to talk on their behalf so freely.
  Hot Shot likes to talk to Joran on messenger ::MonkeyShocked::  she goes for the underdog type people but it all for natalee, she really is a nice person.

Maybe naive?  I don't see where talking with Joran, Steve Croes, Kawish, etc etc has gotten anyone anywhere.  I do agree she only wants to help. 

So where does ldstlou fit into this?These maybe repetitive questions but would like to understand where they are coming from in terms of Kyle.TIA

KTF, just when everyone is back on track, actually discussing real issues, do you really want to drag everyone back to attack mode?


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #789
Post by: Magnolia on January 01, 2009, 10:26:03 PM
It is strange how the bungled fish trap investigation and the pond became merged. 

Is there something right before us that we are missing about all this?

BUMP

There is no connection IMHO  ::MonkeyNoNo::
I think they ARE linked. The pond was a diversion for what was really found in the cage. The pond was the VERY last thing searched by the Persitence crew. Did they purposely plant the cage evidence in the pond????

You mean like drop the evidence over the side of that little bitty boat?
I don't think they put any evidence in the pond.  I think we were just
made to think that Joran and company had put the body there.
I think that was done to keep the Monkeys from looking into the
Persistence search any further.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #789
Post by: Keepthefaith on January 01, 2009, 10:26:18 PM
How'd HotShot come to be involved in this thing from the beginning?Does she work with missing people,LE,an attorney??

Hot shot started in June 2005 she went to Aruba a few times to look for Natalee on her own and then met up with a few friends
She has called Tim Miller  and asked it help in the search for Natalee and then started her own web site Aruba silence I think
 she goes to all the events and is very decated to help find natalee


Thanx Blonde!As i started on here about a year ago.I would just like to know the background in terms of Hotshot as well as Ldstlou.They seem to be very close to Kyle.They seem to be able to talk on their behalf so freely.
  Hot Shot likes to talk to Joran on messenger ::MonkeyShocked::  she goes for the underdog type people but it all for natalee, she really is a nice person.

Maybe naive?  I don't see where talking with Joran, Steve Croes, Kawish, etc etc has gotten anyone anywhere.  I do agree she only wants to help. 

So where does ldstlou fit into this?These maybe repetitive questions but would like to understand where they are coming from in terms of Kyle.TIA

KTF, just when everyone is back on track, actually discussing real issues, do you really want to drag everyone back to attack mode?

The issues for me are the cage and the cover-up and why people are so opposed to it.What's your issues??


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #789
Post by: Anna on January 01, 2009, 10:30:15 PM
It is strange how the bungled fish trap investigation and the pond became merged. 

Is there something right before us that we are missing about all this?

BUMP

There is no connection IMHO  ::MonkeyNoNo::
I think they ARE linked. The pond was a diversion for what was really found in the cage. The pond was the VERY last thing searched by the Persitence crew. Did they purposely plant the cage evidence in the pond????

But at one point in time, Kyle said Caps might even be Dirty Hand!

Then next thing we know, they are all big chums?  How did that happen.

These are things that make me be confused and tend to think it is ALL just BS.  Natalee is prolly under the concrete at the Sloots and it is ALL a diversion.



Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #789
Post by: San on January 01, 2009, 10:32:56 PM
It is strange how the bungled fish trap investigation and the pond became merged. 

Is there something right before us that we are missing about all this?

BUMP

There is no connection IMHO  ::MonkeyNoNo::
I think they ARE linked. The pond was a diversion for what was really found in the cage. The pond was the VERY last thing searched by the Persitence crew. Did they purposely plant the cage evidence in the pond????

But at one point in time, Kyle said Caps might even be Dirty Hand!

Then next thing we know, they are all big chums?  How did that happen.

These are things that make me be confused and tend to think it is ALL just BS.  Natalee is prolly under the concrete at the Sloots and it is ALL a diversion.


Well I always felt the search they did was a big sham.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #789
Post by: Keepthefaith on January 01, 2009, 10:33:09 PM
The issues for me are the cage and the cover-up and why people are so opposed to it.What's your issues?

Iris.I await your response.What are your issues?


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #789
Post by: iris44 on January 01, 2009, 10:34:56 PM
It is strange how the bungled fish trap investigation and the pond became merged. 

Is there something right before us that we are missing about all this?

BUMP

There is no connection IMHO  ::MonkeyNoNo::
I think they ARE linked. The pond was a diversion for what was really found in the cage. The pond was the VERY last thing searched by the Persitence crew. Did they purposely plant the cage evidence in the pond????

I would think that Greta has more of an inside scoop on all this, and she actually discussed the new witness and the pond, but is not discussing the trap.  I was a believer in remains in the trap for a long time, but am starting to believe the trap had nothing to do with Natalee and the Persistance did pull out for lack of funds, and to search the other targets would take massive funding, so that's why it hasn't been done. 


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #789
Post by: bastibro on January 01, 2009, 10:36:11 PM
It is strange how the bungled fish trap investigation and the pond became merged. 

Is there something right before us that we are missing about all this?

BUMP

There is no connection IMHO  ::MonkeyNoNo::
I think they ARE linked. The pond was a diversion for what was really found in the cage. The pond was the VERY last thing searched by the Persitence crew. Did they purposely plant the cage evidence in the pond????

hmmm OK, they planted human remains, the remains of Natalee, from the sea cage into the Monserat pond?   I just can`t believe people are that evil.   No, i don`t believe that at all Wreck ::MonkeyNoNo::
Silvetti? Caps? No way, i don`t buy that.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #789
Post by: wreck on January 01, 2009, 10:36:30 PM
It is strange how the bungled fish trap investigation and the pond became merged. 

Is there something right before us that we are missing about all this?

BUMP

There is no connection IMHO  ::MonkeyNoNo::
I think they ARE linked. The pond was a diversion for what was really found in the cage. The pond was the VERY last thing searched by the Persitence crew. Did they purposely plant the cage evidence in the pond????

But at one point in time, Kyle said Caps might even be Dirty Hand!

Then next thing we know, they are all big chums?  How did that happen.

These are things that make me be confused and tend to think it is ALL just BS.  Natalee is prolly under the concrete at the Sloots and it is ALL a diversion.


Caps was hellbent to tell us that Natalee was "cut up in several pieces" -- was that to explain away why remains might be found in the cage AND the pond?


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #789
Post by: SS on January 01, 2009, 10:46:09 PM
Hi Tib...Happy New Year to you as well...Will switch our weather for a week or two!

SS......I have 2 different IPs on the same page of a thread in this Forum. I think I have a screen capture, if not I will make sure I do it. I also use more than one computer, so I have absolutely no idea what point Kermit has been trying to make. Especially now she professes to use 7...Oh...I guess she is now CIA, FBI or something... ::MonkeyWaa::

Remember ALE is watching. FBI too.  ::MonkeyEek::

Click on my profile and you can see a post of mine this morning about Caps posting from Aruba. It seems I was tracking Caps long before either Kermit and Jen, and Yes he was posting from Aruba. I have a heap of them saved.

By my calculations I have managed to squeeze in before all the "devices".  ::MonkeyWink::







 ::MonkeyHaHa::   ::MonkeyHaHa::  Mum - you know I have counted on you for a year now to track that IP stuff because I have no clue.  I can't even find my own IP.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #789
Post by: wreck on January 01, 2009, 10:49:55 PM
I'm only asking questions!  ::MonkeyCool::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #789
Post by: bastibro on January 01, 2009, 10:50:21 PM
Hi Tib...Happy New Year to you as well...Will switch our weather for a week or two!

SS......I have 2 different IPs on the same page of a thread in this Forum. I think I have a screen capture, if not I will make sure I do it. I also use more than one computer, so I have absolutely no idea what point Kermit has been trying to make. Especially now she professes to use 7...Oh...I guess she is now CIA, FBI or something... ::MonkeyWaa::

Remember ALE is watching. FBI too.  ::MonkeyEek::

Click on my profile and you can see a post of mine this morning about Caps posting from Aruba. It seems I was tracking Caps long before either Kermit and Jen, and Yes he was posting from Aruba. I have a heap of them saved.

By my calculations I have managed to squeeze in before all the "devices".  ::MonkeyWink::







 ::MonkeyHaHa::   ::MonkeyHaHa::  Mum - you know I have counted on you for a year now to track that IP stuff because I have no clue.  I can't even find my own IP.

Hi SS, well, according my IP, i now live in the USA
I tried Blonde`s link and installed it  ::MonkeyHaHa::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #789
Post by: 2NJSons_Mom on January 01, 2009, 10:50:23 PM
Hi Tib...Happy New Year to you as well...Will switch our weather for a week or two!

SS......I have 2 different IPs on the same page of a thread in this Forum. I think I have a screen capture, if not I will make sure I do it. I also use more than one computer, so I have absolutely no idea what point Kermit has been trying to make. Especially now she professes to use 7...Oh...I guess she is now CIA, FBI or something... ::MonkeyWaa::

Remember ALE is watching. FBI too.  ::MonkeyEek::

Click on my profile and you can see a post of mine this morning about Caps posting from Aruba. It seems I was tracking Caps long before either Kermit and Jen, and Yes he was posting from Aruba. I have a heap of them saved.

By my calculations I have managed to squeeze in before all the "devices".  ::MonkeyWink::







 ::MonkeyHaHa::   ::MonkeyHaHa::  Mum - you know I have counted on you for a year now to track that IP stuff because I have no clue.  I can't even find my own IP.

There are a ways to find your IP outside of this forum, but the easiest for me to help you now is to look at your last post.  It should show in the bottom right corner.  No one else can see it there, but it would also show in the Sitemeter when you log in.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #789
Post by: Keepthefaith on January 01, 2009, 10:52:16 PM
The issues for me are the cage and the cover-up and why people are so opposed to it.What's your issues?

Iris.I await your response.What are your issues?

Don't know if you read iris?TIA


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #789
Post by: iris44 on January 01, 2009, 10:56:11 PM
The issues for me are the cage and the cover-up and why people are so opposed to it.What's your issues?

Iris.I await your response.What are your issues?

Don't know if you read iris?TIA

I just think it's time to move forward with discussing actual issues of the case instead of certain poster's motives.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #789
Post by: SS on January 01, 2009, 10:59:42 PM
Hi Tib...Happy New Year to you as well...Will switch our weather for a week or two!

SS......I have 2 different IPs on the same page of a thread in this Forum. I think I have a screen capture, if not I will make sure I do it. I also use more than one computer, so I have absolutely no idea what point Kermit has been trying to make. Especially now she professes to use 7...Oh...I guess she is now CIA, FBI or something... ::MonkeyWaa::

Remember ALE is watching. FBI too.  ::MonkeyEek::

Click on my profile and you can see a post of mine this morning about Caps posting from Aruba. It seems I was tracking Caps long before either Kermit and Jen, and Yes he was posting from Aruba. I have a heap of them saved.

By my calculations I have managed to squeeze in before all the "devices".  ::MonkeyWink::







 ::MonkeyHaHa::   ::MonkeyHaHa::  Mum - you know I have counted on you for a year now to track that IP stuff because I have no clue.  I can't even find my own IP.

Hi SS, well, according my IP, i now live in the USA
I tried Blonde`s link and installed it  ::MonkeyHaHa::



One time someone directed me to a sitemeter here at SM.  It was at the bottom of a page.  I know I couldn't find myself posting from where I know I live.  I just kind of gave up on the IP idea.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #789
Post by: iris44 on January 01, 2009, 11:01:06 PM
It is strange how the bungled fish trap investigation and the pond became merged. 

Is there something right before us that we are missing about all this?

BUMP

There is no connection IMHO  ::MonkeyNoNo::
I think they ARE linked. The pond was a diversion for what was really found in the cage. The pond was the VERY last thing searched by the Persitence crew. Did they purposely plant the cage evidence in the pond????

hmmm OK, they planted human remains, the remains of Natalee, from the sea cage into the Monserat pond?   I just can`t believe people are that evil.   No, i don`t believe that at all Wreck ::MonkeyNoNo::
Silvetti? Caps? No way, i don`t buy that.

Sounds like they were trying to frame Joran! 


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #789
Post by: Keepthefaith on January 01, 2009, 11:02:02 PM
The issues for me are the cage and the cover-up and why people are so opposed to it.What's your issues?

Iris.I await your response.What are your issues?

Don't know if you read iris?TIA

I just think it's time to move forward with discussing actual issues of the case instead of certain poster's motives.

I do appreciate your concerns but i do think the Moderator's will let me know if i'm O/T correct?We apparently have posters who seem to be personally involved and to tell me not to concern myself with there motives i think is bizarre.Why am i not able to know people's role in this tragedy?


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #789
Post by: bastibro on January 01, 2009, 11:02:23 PM
Hi Tib...Happy New Year to you as well...Will switch our weather for a week or two!

SS......I have 2 different IPs on the same page of a thread in this Forum. I think I have a screen capture, if not I will make sure I do it. I also use more than one computer, so I have absolutely no idea what point Kermit has been trying to make. Especially now she professes to use 7...Oh...I guess she is now CIA, FBI or something... ::MonkeyWaa::

Remember ALE is watching. FBI too.  ::MonkeyEek::

Click on my profile and you can see a post of mine this morning about Caps posting from Aruba. It seems I was tracking Caps long before either Kermit and Jen, and Yes he was posting from Aruba. I have a heap of them saved.

By my calculations I have managed to squeeze in before all the "devices".  ::MonkeyWink::







 ::MonkeyHaHa::   ::MonkeyHaHa::  Mum - you know I have counted on you for a year now to track that IP stuff because I have no clue.  I can't even find my own IP.

Hi SS, well, according my IP, i now live in the USA
I tried Blonde`s link and installed it  ::MonkeyHaHa::



One time someone directed me to a sitemeter here at SM.  It was at the bottom of a page.  I know I couldn't find myself posting from where I know I live.  I just kind of gave up on the IP idea.

LOL, it just doesn`t matter when you`re transparent ::MonkeyWink::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #789
Post by: SS on January 01, 2009, 11:03:26 PM
Hey - I found the IP on my last post 2NJ.  I clicked on it and it says that only moderators and the poster can view this information.  How are all of you viewing the information if only the poster and moderators can see it?   ::MonkeyHaHa::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #789
Post by: SS on January 01, 2009, 11:05:13 PM
Hi Tib...Happy New Year to you as well...Will switch our weather for a week or two!

SS......I have 2 different IPs on the same page of a thread in this Forum. I think I have a screen capture, if not I will make sure I do it. I also use more than one computer, so I have absolutely no idea what point Kermit has been trying to make. Especially now she professes to use 7...Oh...I guess she is now CIA, FBI or something... ::MonkeyWaa::

Remember ALE is watching. FBI too.  ::MonkeyEek::

Click on my profile and you can see a post of mine this morning about Caps posting from Aruba. It seems I was tracking Caps long before either Kermit and Jen, and Yes he was posting from Aruba. I have a heap of them saved.

By my calculations I have managed to squeeze in before all the "devices".  ::MonkeyWink::







 ::MonkeyHaHa::   ::MonkeyHaHa::  Mum - you know I have counted on you for a year now to track that IP stuff because I have no clue.  I can't even find my own IP.

Hi SS, well, according my IP, i now live in the USA
I tried Blonde`s link and installed it  ::MonkeyHaHa::



One time someone directed me to a sitemeter here at SM.  It was at the bottom of a page.  I know I couldn't find myself posting from where I know I live.  I just kind of gave up on the IP idea.

LOL, it just doesn`t matter when you`re transparent ::MonkeyWink::


Ms. Cellophane


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #789
Post by: texasmom on January 01, 2009, 11:05:13 PM
 ::MonkeyEek:: ::MonkeyEek:: ::MonkeyEek:: ::MonkeyEek:: ::MonkeyEek::

http://www.awe24.com/

Papiamentu translation:

come across habitantenan of papilon owing to succeed captura one boa very big self some of they're tell cu esey kiermeen much suerte the is measure 2.55m and ela wordo captura among canashito cu papilon just bow of one stoel cu person is sit all nightfall..i owing to bring much spanto at the habitantenan in sercania for his size do 2 metre 55..e two personanan balente here on the potret is esunnan cu owing to succeed kill the boa big here cu one machete.. come across

This picture doesn't include the head, I'm not posting it but it's at the website....I think I'll probably see that in my dreams!

 ::MonkeyShocked::

(http://www.awe24.com/sitebuildercontent/sitebuilderpictures/DEC_2008/1_jan_boa_papilon__1___Small_.jpg)


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #789
Post by: 2NJSons_Mom on January 01, 2009, 11:10:41 PM
Hey - I found the IP on my last post 2NJ.  I clicked on it and it says that only moderators and the poster can view this information.  How are all of you viewing the information if only the poster and moderators can see it?   ::MonkeyHaHa::

Not sure if it's a setting, but as a moderator, I do not see anyone's IP....just my own.  Maybe it should say Administrators.  The sitemeter is a separate site, imo, and it tracks those who enter the FP and the forum.  IPs show there. 

It wasn't my intent to take us on a long discussion about IP addresses.  I just wanted you to be able to see yours.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #789
Post by: bleachedblack on January 01, 2009, 11:12:45 PM
If explaining another persons motives for being here were so simple.....then merely asking might get a response.



Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #789
Post by: Kermit on January 01, 2009, 11:17:35 PM
Hi Tib...Happy New Year to you as well...Will switch our weather for a week or two!

SS......I have 2 different IPs on the same page of a thread in this Forum. I think I have a screen capture, if not I will make sure I do it. I also use more than one computer, so I have absolutely no idea what point Kermit has been trying to make. Especially now she professes to use 7...Oh...I guess she is now CIA, FBI or something... ::MonkeyWaa::

Remember ALE is watching. FBI too.  ::MonkeyEek::

Click on my profile and you can see a post of mine this morning about Caps posting from Aruba. It seems I was tracking Caps long before either Kermit and Jen, and Yes he was posting from Aruba. I have a heap of them saved.

By my calculations I have managed to squeeze in before all the "devices".  ::MonkeyWink::





Yes MUM I have 6 computers and a phone that I can log in with.
Mix it up as much as you want so you can come to conclusions that fit your agenda.



Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #789
Post by: hotping on January 01, 2009, 11:18:28 PM
::MonkeyEek:: ::MonkeyEek:: ::MonkeyEek:: ::MonkeyEek:: ::MonkeyEek::

http://www.awe24.com/

Papiamentu translation:

come across habitantenan of papilon owing to succeed captura one boa very big self some of they're tell cu esey kiermeen much suerte the is measure 2.55m and ela wordo captura among canashito cu papilon just bow of one stoel cu person is sit all nightfall..i owing to bring much spanto at the habitantenan in sercania for his size do 2 metre 55..e two personanan balente here on the potret is esunnan cu owing to succeed kill the boa big here cu one machete.. come across

This picture doesn't include the head, I'm not posting it but it's at the website....I think I'll probably see that in my dreams!

 ::MonkeyShocked::

(http://www.awe24.com/sitebuildercontent/sitebuilderpictures/DEC_2008/1_jan_boa_papilon__1___Small_.jpg)
Yuck!  Yep Nightmares for sure tonight!  ::MonkeyEek::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #789
Post by: klaasend on January 01, 2009, 11:18:52 PM
Hey - I found the IP on my last post 2NJ.  I clicked on it and it says that only moderators and the poster can view this information.  How are all of you viewing the information if only the poster and moderators can see it?   ::MonkeyHaHa::

Not sure if it's a setting, but as a moderator, I do not see anyone's IP....just my own.  Maybe it should say Administrators.  The sitemeter is a separate site, imo, and it tracks those who enter the FP and the forum.  IPs show there. 

It wasn't my intent to take us on a long discussion about IP addresses.  I just wanted you to be able to see yours.

You can go to the site meter and see some IP's but you have to guess who the IP belongs to. Administrators can see all IP's.  Moderators just like members can only see their own IPs.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #789
Post by: Kermit on January 01, 2009, 11:19:41 PM
Does anyone have an idea at what point in the ocean search that the detective and his brother met with the Persistence crew?  I'm curious as to if it was before the search began...or at what point?

Kyle said: "Just before Christmas they are contacted by a detective and his brother who gave them information that turned out to be the correct latitude While we were searching shortly before Christmas, we were contacted by an Aruban detective who was involved in the Holloway case. He claimed that his brother had a vision about Natalee¢s body offshore and had coordinates. He and his brother agreed to meet on the Persistence. The detective¢s brother gave what he thought were coordinates, but turned out to be a line of latitude. This latitude aligned with Arashi beach and came within a half mile of the fish trap.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #789
Post by: klaasend on January 01, 2009, 11:22:09 PM
Hi Tib...Happy New Year to you as well...Will switch our weather for a week or two!

SS......I have 2 different IPs on the same page of a thread in this Forum. I think I have a screen capture, if not I will make sure I do it. I also use more than one computer, so I have absolutely no idea what point Kermit has been trying to make. Especially now she professes to use 7...Oh...I guess she is now CIA, FBI or something... ::MonkeyWaa::

Remember ALE is watching. FBI too.  ::MonkeyEek::

Click on my profile and you can see a post of mine this morning about Caps posting from Aruba. It seems I was tracking Caps long before either Kermit and Jen, and Yes he was posting from Aruba. I have a heap of them saved.

By my calculations I have managed to squeeze in before all the "devices".  ::MonkeyWink::





Yes MUM I have 6 computers and a phone that I can log in with.
Mix it up as much as you want so you can come to conclusions that fit your agenda.



OK, now I feel slighted.  I only have 3 PC's and one phone I can log in with unless I go to my FIL's house which is only 3 blocks away  ::MonkeyHaHa::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #789
Post by: 2NJSons_Mom on January 01, 2009, 11:22:51 PM
Hey - I found the IP on my last post 2NJ.  I clicked on it and it says that only moderators and the poster can view this information.  How are all of you viewing the information if only the poster and moderators can see it?   ::MonkeyHaHa::

Not sure if it's a setting, but as a moderator, I do not see anyone's IP....just my own.  Maybe it should say Administrators.  The sitemeter is a separate site, imo, and it tracks those who enter the FP and the forum.  IPs show there. 

It wasn't my intent to take us on a long discussion about IP addresses.  I just wanted you to be able to see yours.

You can go to the site meter and see some IP's but you have to guess who the IP belongs to. Administrators can see all IP's.  Moderators just like members can only see their own IPs.

Exactly, thank you.  When you click on your personal IP, though, it does say what SS posted.  I never looked until now. 


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #789
Post by: Kermit on January 01, 2009, 11:22:54 PM
There are 4 desktops, 3 laptops and a hand held computer at my house, and I'm not CIA, MUM.  That gives me 8, one more than Kermit.  I usually use my desk top, but can and have used any of them in the house.  And if I did outside employment, there could be another computer.  Just sayin'...What is so unbelievable about having multiple computers in this day and age?

EIGHT!
You've got more then I do.







Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #789
Post by: bleachedblack on January 01, 2009, 11:23:26 PM
There are really enough snakes in the government to concentrate on.......can't they just leave the real ones in the brush alone? ::MonkeyNoNo::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #789
Post by: Kermit on January 01, 2009, 11:24:22 PM
I had a thought...doesn't happen often. ::MonkeyHaHa::

When Mos arrested J2K again in Nov, 2007, he said that
he could charge the Ks with at least body disposal or disposal
of human reamins.

Since Kyle stated many times that human remains were found,
could ALE be made to produce those remains for testing.
If they can't or won't produce any remains, could they be
charged with body disposal or disposal of human remains?

At least it would be a starting place.

EXCELLENT and I'm glad you brought that up.
Judge Smid did say the Kalpoes could be arrested for body disposal.
So why no arrests?



Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #789
Post by: Keepthefaith on January 01, 2009, 11:24:47 PM
There are really enough snakes in the government to concentrate on.......can't they just leave the real ones in the brush alone? ::MonkeyNoNo::

 ::MonkeyLaugh:: That's Funny..


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #789
Post by: klaasend on January 01, 2009, 11:25:15 PM
There are really enough snakes in the government to concentrate on.......can't they just leave the real ones in the brush alone? ::MonkeyNoNo::

It appears to be a real problem in Aruba, the boa population.  I don't suppose most tourists want to happen upon them  ::MonkeyWink::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #789
Post by: 2NJSons_Mom on January 01, 2009, 11:25:33 PM
Does anyone have an idea at what point in the ocean search that the detective and his brother met with the Persistence crew?  I'm curious as to if it was before the search began...or at what point?

Kyle said: "Just before Christmas they are contacted by a detective and his brother who gave them information that turned out to be the correct latitude While we were searching shortly before Christmas, we were contacted by an Aruban detective who was involved in the Holloway case. He claimed that his brother had a vision about Natalee¢s body offshore and had coordinates. He and his brother agreed to meet on the Persistence. The detective¢s brother gave what he thought were coordinates, but turned out to be a line of latitude. This latitude aligned with Arashi beach and came within a half mile of the fish trap.


So, they were contacted around the time Caps started posting here.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #789
Post by: Kermit on January 01, 2009, 11:26:36 PM
There are 4 desktops, 3 laptops and a hand held computer at my house, and I'm not CIA, MUM.  That gives me 8, one more than Kermit.  I usually use my desk top, but can and have used any of them in the house.  And if I did outside employment, there could be another computer.  Just sayin'...What is so unbelievable about having multiple computers in this day and age?

Hi Muffy...Absolutely nothing, which is why I can't understand why Kermit kept posting that Caps uses more than one computer.

Good Night it is way late for me...

Somebody asked the question and I was answering THEIR question.







Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #789
Post by: Keepthefaith on January 01, 2009, 11:27:16 PM
I'm starting to believe that Standing next to the Frog is affording me special attention for some reason.Even if i'm mistaken i think i'll KeeptheFaith in the Frog... ::MonkeyDance:: ::MonkeyDance::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #789
Post by: Helen Back on January 01, 2009, 11:27:27 PM
There are 4 desktops, 3 laptops and a hand held computer at my house, and I'm not CIA, MUM.  That gives me 8, one more than Kermit.  I usually use my desk top, but can and have used any of them in the house.  And if I did outside employment, there could be another computer.  Just sayin'...What is so unbelievable about having multiple computers in this day and age?

EIGHT!
You've got more then I do.





And a partridge in a pear tree  ::MonkeyHaHa::





Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #789
Post by: texasmom on January 01, 2009, 11:32:04 PM
Does anyone have an idea at what point in the ocean search that the detective and his brother met with the Persistence crew?  I'm curious as to if it was before the search began...or at what point?

Kyle said: "Just before Christmas they are contacted by a detective and his brother who gave them information that turned out to be the correct latitude While we were searching shortly before Christmas, we were contacted by an Aruban detective who was involved in the Holloway case. He claimed that his brother had a vision about Natalee¢s body offshore and had coordinates. He and his brother agreed to meet on the Persistence. The detective¢s brother gave what he thought were coordinates, but turned out to be a line of latitude. This latitude aligned with Arashi beach and came within a half mile of the fish trap.


Thank you Kermit!!!!  Very interesting!!!!!

(http://i21.photobucket.com/albums/b258/texasmom55/KERMIT/water-bags-repel-flies-2.jpg)


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #789
Post by: Kermit on January 01, 2009, 11:33:51 PM
Does anyone have an idea at what point in the ocean search that the detective and his brother met with the Persistence crew?  I'm curious as to if it was before the search began...or at what point?

Kyle said: "Just before Christmas they are contacted by a detective and his brother who gave them information that turned out to be the correct latitude While we were searching shortly before Christmas, we were contacted by an Aruban detective who was involved in the Holloway case. He claimed that his brother had a vision about Natalee¢s body offshore and had coordinates. He and his brother agreed to meet on the Persistence. The detective¢s brother gave what he thought were coordinates, but turned out to be a line of latitude. This latitude aligned with Arashi beach and came within a half mile of the fish trap.


So, they were contacted around the time Caps started posting here.


Dec. 20, 2007 - CapsLockWizard registered at Scared Monkeys
Same day The Persistence completed the first day of side scan sonar search.



Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #789
Post by: Kermit on January 01, 2009, 11:34:16 PM
Does anyone have an idea at what point in the ocean search that the detective and his brother met with the Persistence crew?  I'm curious as to if it was before the search began...or at what point?

Kyle said: "Just before Christmas they are contacted by a detective and his brother who gave them information that turned out to be the correct latitude While we were searching shortly before Christmas, we were contacted by an Aruban detective who was involved in the Holloway case. He claimed that his brother had a vision about Natalee¢s body offshore and had coordinates. He and his brother agreed to meet on the Persistence. The detective¢s brother gave what he thought were coordinates, but turned out to be a line of latitude. This latitude aligned with Arashi beach and came within a half mile of the fish trap.


Thank you Kermit!!!!  Very interesting!!!!!

(http://i21.photobucket.com/albums/b258/texasmom55/KERMIT/water-bags-repel-flies-2.jpg)

ribbit


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #789
Post by: Kermit on January 01, 2009, 11:35:15 PM
I'm starting to believe that Standing next to the Frog is affording me special attention for some reason.Even if i'm mistaken i think i'll KeeptheFaith in the Frog... ::MonkeyDance:: ::MonkeyDance::

Kiss a frog and you'll get rid of warts!
or I think that is what they say.



Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #789
Post by: Kermit on January 01, 2009, 11:36:17 PM
There are really enough snakes in the government to concentrate on.......can't they just leave the real ones in the brush alone? ::MonkeyNoNo::

It appears to be a real problem in Aruba, the boa population.  I don't suppose most tourists want to happen upon them  ::MonkeyWink::

Or slide slither up next to Julia Renfro.



Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #789
Post by: Blue Moon on January 01, 2009, 11:37:50 PM
Does anyone have an idea at what point in the ocean search that the detective and his brother met with the Persistence crew?  I'm curious as to if it was before the search began...or at what point?

Kyle said: "Just before Christmas they are contacted by a detective and his brother who gave them information that turned out to be the correct latitude While we were searching shortly before Christmas, we were contacted by an Aruban detective who was involved in the Holloway case. He claimed that his brother had a vision about Natalee¢s body offshore and had coordinates. He and his brother agreed to meet on the Persistence. The detective¢s brother gave what he thought were coordinates, but turned out to be a line of latitude. This latitude aligned with Arashi beach and came within a half mile of the fish trap.


So, they were contacted around the time Caps started posting here.

And didn't Caps say that he himself dove down to the cage (meaning he knew exactly what the latitude/longitude of the cage was)?  The cage was still there, why didn't divers take the cage?  Also, caps says Salvetti said nothing in the cage except plastic-then WHY did they make a dive and retrieve all that "plastic" and then test something within the cage?


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #789
Post by: texasmom on January 01, 2009, 11:39:13 PM
There are really enough snakes in the government to concentrate on.......can't they just leave the real ones in the brush alone? ::MonkeyNoNo::

It appears to be a real problem in Aruba, the boa population.  I don't suppose most tourists want to happen upon them  ::MonkeyWink::

Yep, that's what I was thinking!    ::MonkeyEek:: ::MonkeyNoNo::

Maybe we need to design a "Come See Aruba" brochure with a collection of those bad mammajamma's on it!   ::MonkeyWink::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #789
Post by: SS on January 01, 2009, 11:40:11 PM
Hey - I found the IP on my last post 2NJ.  I clicked on it and it says that only moderators and the poster can view this information.  How are all of you viewing the information if only the poster and moderators can see it?   ::MonkeyHaHa::

Not sure if it's a setting, but as a moderator, I do not see anyone's IP....just my own.  Maybe it should say Administrators.  The sitemeter is a separate site, imo, and it tracks those who enter the FP and the forum.  IPs show there. 

It wasn't my intent to take us on a long discussion about IP addresses.  I just wanted you to be able to see yours.

You can go to the site meter and see some IP's but you have to guess who the IP belongs to. Administrators can see all IP's.  Moderators just like members can only see their own IPs.


I found the sitemeter and went to Who's on Your Site and By Location.  I'm still Ms. Cellophane.  My location doesn't show up and neither does my internet provider.   ::MonkeyHaHa::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #789
Post by: 2NJSons_Mom on January 01, 2009, 11:47:46 PM
Hey - I found the IP on my last post 2NJ.  I clicked on it and it says that only moderators and the poster can view this information.  How are all of you viewing the information if only the poster and moderators can see it?   ::MonkeyHaHa::

Not sure if it's a setting, but as a moderator, I do not see anyone's IP....just my own.  Maybe it should say Administrators.  The sitemeter is a separate site, imo, and it tracks those who enter the FP and the forum.  IPs show there. 

It wasn't my intent to take us on a long discussion about IP addresses.  I just wanted you to be able to see yours.

You can go to the site meter and see some IP's but you have to guess who the IP belongs to. Administrators can see all IP's.  Moderators just like members can only see their own IPs.


I found the sitemeter and went to Who's on Your Site and By Location.  I'm still Ms. Cellophane.  My location doesn't show up and neither does my internet provider.   ::MonkeyHaHa::

You've been logged in quite a while.  It only shows the last 100.  You have to look first thing when you check in.   


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #789
Post by: 2NJSons_Mom on January 01, 2009, 11:50:32 PM
Does anyone have an idea at what point in the ocean search that the detective and his brother met with the Persistence crew?  I'm curious as to if it was before the search began...or at what point?

Kyle said: "Just before Christmas they are contacted by a detective and his brother who gave them information that turned out to be the correct latitude While we were searching shortly before Christmas, we were contacted by an Aruban detective who was involved in the Holloway case. He claimed that his brother had a vision about Natalee¢s body offshore and had coordinates. He and his brother agreed to meet on the Persistence. The detective¢s brother gave what he thought were coordinates, but turned out to be a line of latitude. This latitude aligned with Arashi beach and came within a half mile of the fish trap.


So, they were contacted around the time Caps started posting here.

And didn't Caps say that he himself dove down to the cage (meaning he knew exactly what the latitude/longitude of the cage was)?  The cage was still there, why didn't divers take the cage?  Also, caps says Salvetti said nothing in the cage except plastic-then WHY did they make a dive and retrieve all that "plastic" and then test something within the cage?

Some good questions Blue Moon.....


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #789
Post by: bleachedblack on January 01, 2009, 11:51:10 PM
When I check the sitemeter world map now. I guess it is the last 100 to log on. Aruba is indicated.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #789
Post by: bleachedblack on January 01, 2009, 11:55:08 PM
CapsLockWizard, do you like to fish?


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #789
Post by: hotping on January 02, 2009, 12:00:34 AM
CapsLockWizard, do you like to fish?
Poof... the fish is gone.... ::MonkeyWink::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #789
Post by: texasmom on January 02, 2009, 12:07:44 AM
CapsLockWizard, do you like to fish?
Poof... the fish is gone.... ::MonkeyWink::

 ::MonkeyHaHa::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #789
Post by: Blue Moon on January 02, 2009, 12:30:39 AM
Think I will call it a night.  Up too late last night catching up.  Good night everyone.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #789
Post by: Keepthefaith on January 02, 2009, 12:31:25 AM
Think I will call it a night.  Up too late last night catching up.  Good night everyone.

Goodnight BlueMoon.You made it though! ::MonkeyDance::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #789
Post by: klaasend on January 02, 2009, 12:31:29 AM
This may have already been posted here - posted at RU:

Quote
Need2Know Posted: Tue Dec 30, 2008 2:56 pm   

If you really knew me you would know that I have no ego and my opinions do not get in the way of any truth. I have been here from the beginning as well. I have no agenda in this case, never had, never will. There are some very obnoxious posters on both sides, and that is the big part of the problem here, sides have been taken and people DO have agendas and stakes in the outcome of this case.

This may come as a huge shocker to you (or not), but were you aware that your good friend Anita now feels that Joran knows exactly what happened to Natalee and fears he may really be involved? You may never admit it, but I know that is what she confided in somebody close to her who was also very close to Joran. I will not tell you how I know and you can believe it or not, as others who read here can believe it or not, but it came as no surprise to me. As I said, I have no agenda and am only posting it because I am tired of reading the agendas and the lies and the deflecting of this on others that have or had nothing to do with Natalee disappearing.
 



Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #789
Post by: texasmom on January 02, 2009, 12:32:40 AM
Think I will call it a night.  Up too late last night catching up.  Good night everyone.

Goodnight Blue Moon!   ::MonkeyCool::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #789
Post by: Keepthefaith on January 02, 2009, 12:36:51 AM
Think I will call it a night.  Up too late last night catching up.  Good night everyone.

Goodnight Blue Moon!   ::MonkeyCool::

Goodnight TM.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #789
Post by: Keepthefaith on January 02, 2009, 12:39:12 AM
This may have already been posted here - posted at RU:

Quote
Need2Know Posted: Tue Dec 30, 2008 2:56 pm   

If you really knew me you would know that I have no ego and my opinions do not get in the way of any truth. I have been here from the beginning as well. I have no agenda in this case, never had, never will. There are some very obnoxious posters on both sides, and that is the big part of the problem here, sides have been taken and people DO have agendas and stakes in the outcome of this case.

This may come as a huge shocker to you (or not), but were you aware that your good friend Anita now feels that Joran knows exactly what happened to Natalee and fears he may really be involved? You may never admit it, but I know that is what she confided in somebody close to her who was also very close to Joran. I will not tell you how I know and you can believe it or not, as others who read here can believe it or not, but it came as no surprise to me. As I said, I have no agenda and am only posting it because I am tired of reading the agendas and the lies and the deflecting of this on others that have or had nothing to do with Natalee disappearing.
 



At what point did she come to that conclusion!!! ::MonkeyLaugh::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #789
Post by: texasmom on January 02, 2009, 12:41:37 AM
http://www.drasties.com/?p=4737

Google translation:

Brinkman Zero to Hero on Fox News
Hero Brinkman, the dashing nephew of Geert Wilders, has indicated that Aruba Foxnews "corrupt as hell is. PVV-er Brinkman, who has long been of the Antilles and Aruba would like, was interviewed about the disappearance of Natalee Holloway. Brinkman, once police inspector, Aruba is corrupt police officers because their work did not remain at work. "Everyone, including the Dutch government know that Aruba is corrupt, but there is nothing to be done. Purely for political reasons. "
For Fox News, these kinds of comments that their big 'conspiracy theory' fully confirmed, of course, grist to the mill. At the end of the interview to say Foxnews Hero Brinkman in the future to help "if you help us." In short, the PVV is carved in the next elections and Brinkman from Zero to Hero on Fox News.

4 Responses to "Zero to Hero Brinkman on Fox News"
1.foxtrot Says:
December 10th, 2008 at 4:36 am
A politician who speaks the truth. Good. It is through that political correct this misery caused.

2.AchGekkerd Says:
December 10th, 2008 at 4:39 am
One has an Islam-phobia. The other one Aruba-phobia. Strange game.

3.maleier Says:
December 10th, 2008 at 8:19 am
Now I see him, 'zero to hero' ..

4.warhoofd Says:
December 10th, 2008 at 8:27 am
Is that just a corrcte politician dares to say his opinion. And in this case there is a large core of truth.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #789
Post by: Magnolia on January 02, 2009, 12:53:13 AM
Isn't it tomorrow that JQK and Hero Brinkman and Greta are
to descend on Aruba?


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #789
Post by: billb's daughter on January 02, 2009, 12:58:25 AM
Robots would have already been first!
Yes he would!...I posted his last post yesterday, and as I was looking at his many posts.....he always wanted to be first. Even accused Janet and others of cheating when they beat him to the first post on the new thread..... ::MonkeyCool::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #789
Post by: klaasend on January 02, 2009, 01:08:43 AM
Isn't it tomorrow that JQK and Hero Brinkman and Greta are
to descend on Aruba?

I think so


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #789
Post by: texasmom on January 02, 2009, 01:14:19 AM
http://renevannie.com/inhoud/kritisch/_kritisch.html

Google translation:

Collectors item
We are 70 to January 10, 2009. Still smoothing continue thus.
On the occasion of the high number of years, I very
unique and varied book of 206 pages.
Many short stories, drawings of Lejo Ros and photographs from a rich film history.
There are only 70 books printed. Numbered and signed.
The book will be introduced and sold on January 10 as from 11.00 to 1.00
at book of Village. Each buyer will receive coffee and cakes or soft.
Ultimately, the party!
The price of the book is AFL. 39.50 incl separate story SHOE.  
After January 10 - if there is something about - the book available at Vandorpe / de Wit
and me in the store, STATE OF THE ART, Renaissance Market. In addition to Subway.

Already a book reservations are available. (Link to order at website)
There are now 32 BOOKS ALL RESERVED. INCL. #
8 BOOK FOR FAMILY AND FRIENDS AND PRESS REPRESENTAIE.
TIME TO REST ON THIS BUT STILL 30 BOOK!

(Poster for his book about Joran's Shoe entitled "Shoe")

(http://renevannie.com/inhoud/kritisch/SCHOEN.jpg)

Also on his website:

That message about a possible harmful role
of former Commissioner Jan van der Straten is as old as the way to Rome.
It is already a year in this website. There is nothing to be done!
Jan van der Straten Joran has only 10 days after the verdijning of Natalee to pick up. 10 days later !!!!!!! At that time could Joran - together with his father Paul? - Easy to remove all traces.
But there's another side to the dirty business. Jan van der Straten was called immediately after the disappearance of the girl 2 black men whose arrest was immediately clear that they had nothing to do with it.
All about time.
In short, Joran, Paul and Jan, they know more about !!!!!!!!!!!
That examined ????? NO!
Why not?? All save me dead. There is always bullshit here on the island that Paul van der Sloot as much power. What power? Paul is no more than a simple advokaatje!




Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #789
Post by: klaasend on January 02, 2009, 01:22:34 AM
Funny

(http://i118.photobucket.com/albums/o100/klaasen3/Sub5/shoe.jpg)


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #789
Post by: billb's daughter on January 02, 2009, 01:58:30 AM
Does anyone have an idea at what point in the ocean search that the detective and his brother met with the Persistence crew?  I'm curious as to if it was before the search began...or at what point?

Kyle said: "Just before Christmas they are contacted by a detective and his brother who gave them information that turned out to be the correct latitude While we were searching shortly before Christmas, we were contacted by an Aruban detective who was involved in the Holloway case. He claimed that his brother had a vision about Natalee¢s body offshore and had coordinates. He and his brother agreed to meet on the Persistence. The detective¢s brother gave what he thought were coordinates, but turned out to be a line of latitude. This latitude aligned with Arashi beach and came within a half mile of the fish trap.


So, they were contacted around the time Caps started posting here.

And didn't Caps say that he himself dove down to the cage (meaning he knew exactly what the latitude/longitude of the cage was)?  The cage was still there, why didn't divers take the cage?  Also, caps says Salvetti said nothing in the cage except plastic-then WHY did they make a dive and retrieve all that "plastic" and then test something within the cage?

Some good questions Blue Moon.....
The more I read the last few days I have come to the following thoughts...
1. The persistence mission did not live up to its advertised  objective.
2. Tim Miller was conned....than removed when he became a 'liability'
3. Kyle questioned the persistence objective after the fact...was given time to do the right thing....but did not
4. John S & Kyle & Caps are somehow intertwined......mhoo..doesn't bode well with the timing of this relationship....best guess...at least a diversion from the cage contents...
5. Idstlou, hotspot and a few others have muddied the posts of the last few days trying to defend john s., kyle, Caps....intentional to throw off the questioning surrounding the contents of the cage? I don't know...but suspect that is part of their agenda.....(are their intentions towards Justice for Natalee good and they are only mislead? I'd like to think so....I respected their posts in the past...but it is still annoying at this time- sorry mum).
6. Kermit has brought the issue with persistence/kyle to SM ( I stand with the frog -green legs and all) and many freebirds left to support Kermit on SM....
The point now is to put all the pressure possible on those in authority (state department - fbi - media/Greta/Peter DVs - dutch - aruba, whomever we have routes to) to expose what the contents of the cage are.....we have pictures...kyle's own words that aruba took cage contents...we need to push this agenda...What was in the cage that aruba divers recovered?
mhoo...billb
 


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #789
Post by: CapsLockWizard on January 02, 2009, 02:07:31 AM
CapsLockWizard, do you like to fish?
Poof... the fish is gone.... ::MonkeyWink::

 ::MonkeyHaHa::

the fish is not gone


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #789
Post by: texasmom on January 02, 2009, 02:12:50 AM
CapsLockWizard, do you like to fish?
Poof... the fish is gone.... ::MonkeyWink::

 ::MonkeyHaHa::

the fish is not gone

Hi Caps!


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #789
Post by: billb's daughter on January 02, 2009, 02:13:15 AM
CapsLockWizard, do you like to fish?
Poof... the fish is gone.... ::MonkeyWink::

 ::MonkeyHaHa::

the fish is not gone
Caps....want to believe the fish is not gone. Lots of questions over the last few days...can you please provide an update?
thank you.
V/r,
billb


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #789
Post by: Lifesong on January 02, 2009, 02:13:52 AM
CapsLockWizard, do you like to fish?
Poof... the fish is gone.... ::MonkeyWink::

 ::MonkeyHaHa::

the fish is not gone

Hi Caps.  Got anything to add regarding Kyle or John Silvetti?  Clyde Burke?  Jossy Mansur?  Eduardo Mansur? 

 ::MonkeyWink::



Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #789
Post by: hotping on January 02, 2009, 02:20:23 AM
CapsLockWizard, do you like to fish?
Poof... the fish is gone.... ::MonkeyWink::

 ::MonkeyHaHa::

the fish is not gone
I didn't mean for good....Hi Caps!


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #789
Post by: texasmom on January 02, 2009, 02:26:06 AM
Does anyone have an idea at what point in the ocean search that the detective and his brother met with the Persistence crew?  I'm curious as to if it was before the search began...or at what point?

Kyle said: "Just before Christmas they are contacted by a detective and his brother who gave them information that turned out to be the correct latitude While we were searching shortly before Christmas, we were contacted by an Aruban detective who was involved in the Holloway case. He claimed that his brother had a vision about Natalee¢s body offshore and had coordinates. He and his brother agreed to meet on the Persistence. The detective¢s brother gave what he thought were coordinates, but turned out to be a line of latitude. This latitude aligned with Arashi beach and came within a half mile of the fish trap.


So, they were contacted around the time Caps started posting here.

And didn't Caps say that he himself dove down to the cage (meaning he knew exactly what the latitude/longitude of the cage was)?  The cage was still there, why didn't divers take the cage?  Also, caps says Salvetti said nothing in the cage except plastic-then WHY did they make a dive and retrieve all that "plastic" and then test something within the cage?

Some good questions Blue Moon.....
The more I read the last few days I have come to the following thoughts...
1. The persistence mission did not live up to its advertised  objective.
2. Tim Miller was conned....than removed when he became a 'liability'
3. Kyle questioned the persistence objective after the fact...was given time to do the right thing....but did not
4. John S & Kyle & Caps are somehow intertwined......mhoo..doesn't bode well with the timing of this relationship....best guess...at least a diversion from the cage contents...
5. Idstlou, hotshot and a few others have muddied the posts of the last few days trying to defend john s., kyle, Caps....intentional to throw off the questioning surrounding the contents of the cage? I don't know...but suspect that is part of their agenda.....(are their intentions towards Justice for Natalee good and they are only mislead? I'd like to think so....I respected their posts in the past...but it is still annoying at this time- sorry mum).
6. Kermit has brought the issue with persistence/kyle to SM ( I stand with the frog -green legs and all) and many freebirds left to support Kermit on SM....
The point now is to put all the pressure possible on those in authority (state department - fbi - media/Greta/Peter DVs - dutch - aruba, whomever we have routes to) to expose what the contents of the cage are.....we have pictures...kyle's own words that aruba took cage contents...we need to push this agenda...What was in the cage that aruba divers recovered?
mhoo...billb
 

Thanks for sharing your thoughts billb, I agree; green legs and all.   ::MonkeyWink::

 
 


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #789
Post by: billb's daughter on January 02, 2009, 02:32:49 AM
Caps.....you probably know if you have been reading through the last few threads.....your work is being questioned.
I believed in what you were posting then, but I'd like you to respond to those questions so I can keep my faith in your theories...I often said that I think you have the "what happened to Natalee that night" and Kermit has the final disposal site of Natalee's remains....do I have that right?


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #789
Post by: billb's daughter on January 02, 2009, 02:34:00 AM
Does anyone have an idea at what point in the ocean search that the detective and his brother met with the Persistence crew?  I'm curious as to if it was before the search began...or at what point?

Kyle said: "Just before Christmas they are contacted by a detective and his brother who gave them information that turned out to be the correct latitude While we were searching shortly before Christmas, we were contacted by an Aruban detective who was involved in the Holloway case. He claimed that his brother had a vision about Natalee¢s body offshore and had coordinates. He and his brother agreed to meet on the Persistence. The detective¢s brother gave what he thought were coordinates, but turned out to be a line of latitude. This latitude aligned with Arashi beach and came within a half mile of the fish trap.


So, they were contacted around the time Caps started posting here.

And didn't Caps say that he himself dove down to the cage (meaning he knew exactly what the latitude/longitude of the cage was)?  The cage was still there, why didn't divers take the cage?  Also, caps says Salvetti said nothing in the cage except plastic-then WHY did they make a dive and retrieve all that "plastic" and then test something within the cage?

Some good questions Blue Moon.....
The more I read the last few days I have come to the following thoughts...
1. The persistence mission did not live up to its advertised  objective.
2. Tim Miller was conned....than removed when he became a 'liability'
3. Kyle questioned the persistence objective after the fact...was given time to do the right thing....but did not
4. John S & Kyle & Caps are somehow intertwined......mhoo..doesn't bode well with the timing of this relationship....best guess...at least a diversion from the cage contents...
5. Idstlou, hotshot and a few others have muddied the posts of the last few days trying to defend john s., kyle, Caps....intentional to throw off the questioning surrounding the contents of the cage? I don't know...but suspect that is part of their agenda.....(are their intentions towards Justice for Natalee good and they are only mislead? I'd like to think so....I respected their posts in the past...but it is still annoying at this time- sorry mum).
6. Kermit has brought the issue with persistence/kyle to SM ( I stand with the frog -green legs and all) and many freebirds left to support Kermit on SM....
The point now is to put all the pressure possible on those in authority (state department - fbi - media/Greta/Peter DVs - dutch - aruba, whomever we have routes to) to expose what the contents of the cage are.....we have pictures...kyle's own words that aruba took cage contents...we need to push this agenda...What was in the cage that aruba divers recovered?
mhoo...billb
 

Thanks for sharing your thoughts billb, I agree; green legs and all.   ::MonkeyWink::

 
 
Thanks TM... ::MonkeyCool::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #789
Post by: texasmom on January 02, 2009, 02:48:22 AM
This is the contact information for the FBI and State Department that was posted in another thread by Magnolia and I.  If anyone has additional contact information, please post it.  TIA

Special Agent in Charge
Carmen S. Adams

Assistant Special Agent in Charge
Charles E. Regan

Birmingham Division History
   Birmingham Division Contact Information
Address
1000 18th Street North
Birmingham, Alabama 35203
 
Telephone
(205)326-6166
 Facsimile
(205)279-1590
 
Email
General information: birmingham@ic.fbi.gov
Office Hours
8:15 AM to 5:00 PM, Monday through Friday
24 Hour Emergency Service

How to Report a Crime or Provide Information
For the location of a local FBI office, see our Jurisdiction page

An FBI representative can be reached 24 hours a day by calling (205)326-6166

If you have been the victim of a crime or have information relating to a crime, please contact your nearest FBI office. All complaints are confidential.

You can also email the Birmingham office at birmingham@ic.fbi.gov

This is an older link for Carmen Adams email (maybe send a cc to this address also)
(sac = Special Agent in Charge)
   sac.birmingham@fbi.gov

Link to State Department Question/Comment Email Page:
(This is the only contact information I've been able to locate)

http://contact-us.state.gov/cgi-bin/state.cfg/php/enduser/ask.php?p_sid=wzUZ4Umj&p_accessibility=0&p_redirect=&p_sp=cF9zcmNoPSZwX3NvcnRfYnk9JnBfZ3JpZHNvcnQ9JnBfcm93X2NudD0xMTEsMTExJnBfcHJvZHM9JnBfY2F0cz0mcF9wdj0mcF9jdj0mcF9zZWFyY2hfdHlwZT1hbnN3ZXJzLnNlYXJjaF9ubCZwX3BhZ2U9MQ




Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #789
Post by: hotping on January 02, 2009, 02:53:46 AM
Good Night Monkeys ....This fish (pisces) needs sleep!  ::MonkeyCool::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #789
Post by: texasmom on January 02, 2009, 02:55:49 AM
Good Night Monkeys ....This fish (pisces) needs sleep!  ::MonkeyCool::

Goodnight Hotping!   ::MonkeyCool::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #789
Post by: billb's daughter on January 02, 2009, 02:58:30 AM
This is the contact information for the FBI and State Department that was posted in another thread by Magnolia and I.  If anyone has additional contact information, please post it.  TIA

Special Agent in Charge
Carmen S. Adams

Assistant Special Agent in Charge
Charles E. Regan

Birmingham Division History
   Birmingham Division Contact Information
Address
1000 18th Street North
Birmingham, Alabama 35203
 
Telephone
(205)326-6166
 Facsimile
(205)279-1590
 
Email
General information: birmingham@ic.fbi.gov
Office Hours
8:15 AM to 5:00 PM, Monday through Friday
24 Hour Emergency Service

How to Report a Crime or Provide Information
For the location of a local FBI office, see our Jurisdiction page

An FBI representative can be reached 24 hours a day by calling (205)326-6166

If you have been the victim of a crime or have information relating to a crime, please contact your nearest FBI office. All complaints are confidential.

You can also email the Birmingham office at birmingham@ic.fbi.gov

This is an older link for Carmen Adams email (maybe send a cc to this address also)
(sac = Special Agent in Charge)
   sac.birmingham@fbi.gov

Link to State Department Question/Comment Email Page:
(This is the only contact information I've been able to locate)

http://contact-us.state.gov/cgi-bin/state.cfg/php/enduser/ask.php?p_sid=wzUZ4Umj&p_accessibility=0&p_redirect=&p_sp=cF9zcmNoPSZwX3NvcnRfYnk9JnBfZ3JpZHNvcnQ9JnBfcm93X2NudD0xMTEsMTExJnBfcHJvZHM9JnBfY2F0cz0mcF9wdj0mcF9jdj0mcF9zZWFyY2hfdHlwZT1hbnN3ZXJzLnNlYXJjaF9ubCZwX3BhZ2U9MQ



TM, After you and Mags posted this info, i sent an email to the state department, and then proudly posted my email to the state department on SM. I was a little disappointed at that time that there wasn't any response to my post....I always seem to post late at night when there are few online and was hopeful that my post would be picked up the next morning....Oh well....that did not happen. But since you posted this again (Thank you) I hope other Monkeys will heed it and send their comments to your links...with emphasis on the latest developments wrt the cage content pictures and the apparent coverup of the cage contents removal by aruban divers.....Monkeys need to push this forward and TM has now provided the contacts needed to do that!
Thanks TM and Mags....... ::MonkeyCool::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #789
Post by: texasmom on January 02, 2009, 02:59:10 AM
Hi Frank! 
Thanks for sharing about "The Shack" here to Ms Scarlett IIRC.  I have been reading it and I'm really enjoying it!  When I mentioned this last night, Hotping said she's reading it also!  I've found it to be very thought provoking.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #789
Post by: texasmom on January 02, 2009, 03:06:21 AM
billb,
I hope you don't mind I'm giving it a bump here so others can see how easy it is.

http://scaredmonkeys.net/index.php?topic=4246.460

billb  12/19/2008

Quote
US State Department
OVERSEAS CITIZENS SERVICES: Call 1-888-407-4747 (from overseas: 202-501-4444) for answers related to questions concerning the:

    * Death of an American citizen abroad
    * Arrest/detention of an American citizen abroad
    * Robbery of an American citizen abroad
    * American citizens missing abroad
    * Crisis abroad involving American citizens
    * After-hours number for an emergency involving an American citizen abroad
To ask a question via email:

http://contact-us.state.gov/cgi-bin/state.cfg/php/enduser/ask.php?p_sid=jxOHQJlj&p_accessibility=0&p_redirect=&p_sp=cF9zcmNoPSZwX3NvcnRfYnk9JnBfZ3JpZHNvcnQ9JnBfcm93X2NudD0xMTEsMTExJnBfcHJvZHM9JnBfY2F0cz0mcF9wdj0mcF9jdj0mcF9zZWFyY2hfdHlwZT1hbnN3ZXJzLnNlYXJjaF9ubCZwX3BhZ2U9MQ**

Copy and paste the bold
 HTTP

It was easy to submit a question on the site:
My question:
Secretary Rice met with the mother (Beth Holloway Twitty) of Natalee Holloway WRT her daughter's disappearance May 30th, 2005. Secretary Rice, after hearing Beth's account of the lack of investigation by the Aruban authorities, directed that the FBI take a closer look into the events surrounding her daughter's disappearance. Can you please provide an update of the actions our State Department, Secretary Rice, and the FBI have taken to ensure there is/will be Justice for Natalee Holloway, a US citizen?
Thank you.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #789
Post by: texasmom on January 02, 2009, 03:12:41 AM
http://scaredmonkeys.net/index.php?topic=4246.400
 

Quote
Quote from: wreck on December 18, 2008, 11:21:13 AM
Well, what do we do with Kermit's information? Kermit says she has given it to the FBI AND the family. I'm not sure as to what we here are supposed to do with this information. Kermit, what do you want/need US to do?? Are you confident that things are being done in the background (and I don't mean private forums!)?


Response from Kermit:
Quote
Re: Natalee Case Discussion #786 12/17/08 -
« Reply #414 on: December 18, 2008, 09:01:05 PM » 

Send emails to the Birmingham FBI office - attention Carmen S Adams, and copy those emails to our State Department in Washington
 
Include the pictures, and Kyle's words.
 
Plead with them to put pressure on Aruba, and more importantly on The Hague for answers.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #789
Post by: finngirl on January 02, 2009, 03:16:57 AM

CapsLockWizard, do you like to fish?
Poof... the fish is gone.... ::MonkeyWink::

 ::MonkeyHaHa::

the fish is not gone

and not saying much either  :wink:



Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #789
Post by: CapsLockWizard on January 02, 2009, 03:17:45 AM
CapsLockWizard, do you like to fish?
Poof... the fish is gone.... ::MonkeyWink::

 ::MonkeyHaHa::

the fish is not gone

Hi Caps.  Got anything to add regarding Kyle or John Silvetti?  Clyde Burke?  Jossy Mansur?  Eduardo Mansur? 

 ::MonkeyWink::



The saddest aspect of life right now is that science gathers knowledge faster than society gathers wisdom.

Just watch this week for the arrest of a major player of the game...and probably a big strike in the making and uproar in the house of Babylon.

Question: how many years did the USA took to get Gotti Convicted.?

So like a said: in colombia they call those that make information up to confuse the issues of this case a SAPO.

How can we hunt for lions while those on this net is working against the work at hand. Watch a movie is not like reading the book of the movie.

In the state the only thing that can be done right now is to pray...since those that scream the loudest are not in the field...but is try to confuse the world.

Things has happend but like I said before. A Sapo war is a lost war....

Remeber 911 ....the first attempt was that the basement, but then the media did give a whole information on how the building was done and how strong it was and where the weakest link were.....where is it now...

if we want to win we have to investigate and not pointing finger to those that are at work...

What ever kyle did and the OE did, I do not know, I was not there. I work alone with a group that can not be put at risk

What I hate the most of this site now is the way the information is twisted, but it is the same method that was use by those that made Natalee desapear, they twist the info.

If anyone to work on the case work on the case. but all that was said is said, we are not working in the future but with info that has been twisted in 2005 and need to be put back straight...

Investigate, but never assume and make thing up or cut and paste and reassamble what people said to proof your own view without knowing the real context in which that particular text was written or no even knowing what was the question to the origin of the text.

Every event in 2005 had a flow and when the truth is change, we allways will have a paradox. and I see it happend here in this forum also or should I call it SM Paradox.

Peter devries tried to put in in a movie but it does not compute, and so a lot is trying to assamble the story.

Read again what I say, how can you hunt lions without a local guide. and put your own magination those all that has tried to build a picture of this case;

and jumb the gun for some momement of sensation, they do not know the real truth, but they do not sit everyday in aruba and continue with the work at hand...all take carefully planning, and all seems to forget one thing, and that is in the question above...to know who (the corrupt Babylons) takes time, but go to war without knowing them is suicidal to all.

CAPS




Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #789
Post by: billb's daughter on January 02, 2009, 03:20:20 AM
billb,
I hope you don't mind I'm giving it a bump here so others can see how easy it is.

http://scaredmonkeys.net/index.php?topic=4246.460

billb  12/19/2008

Quote
US State Department
OVERSEAS CITIZENS SERVICES: Call 1-888-407-4747 (from overseas: 202-501-4444) for answers related to questions concerning the:

    * Death of an American citizen abroad
    * Arrest/detention of an American citizen abroad
    * Robbery of an American citizen abroad
    * American citizens missing abroad
    * Crisis abroad involving American citizens
    * After-hours number for an emergency involving an American citizen abroad
To ask a question via email:

http://contact-us.state.gov/cgi-bin/state.cfg/php/enduser/ask.php?p_sid=jxOHQJlj&p_accessibility=0&p_redirect=&p_sp=cF9zcmNoPSZwX3NvcnRfYnk9JnBfZ3JpZHNvcnQ9JnBfcm93X2NudD0xMTEsMTExJnBfcHJvZHM9JnBfY2F0cz0mcF9wdj0mcF9jdj0mcF9zZWFyY2hfdHlwZT1hbnN3ZXJzLnNlYXJjaF9ubCZwX3BhZ2U9MQ**

Copy and paste the bold
 HTTP

It was easy to submit a question on the site:
My question:
Secretary Rice met with the mother (Beth Holloway Twitty) of Natalee Holloway WRT her daughter's disappearance May 30th, 2005. Secretary Rice, after hearing Beth's account of the lack of investigation by the Aruban authorities, directed that the FBI take a closer look into the events surrounding her daughter's disappearance. Can you please provide an update of the actions our State Department, Secretary Rice, and the FBI have taken to ensure there is/will be Justice for Natalee Holloway, a US citizen?
Thank you.
TM....of course I don't mind.. ::MonkeyWink::
Monkeys...I throw out a challenge to you all right now.......send your comments to the links below and if you feel so inclined...post them here at SM......we all want to make a difference for Natalee......this is one of the easiest way...Justice for Natalee.... ::MonkeyCool:: ::MonkeyDance::
DO IT....
Thanks, and come back again.......


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #789
Post by: texasmom on January 02, 2009, 03:27:44 AM


Thanks for the response Caps!  ::MonkeyCool::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #789
Post by: billb's daughter on January 02, 2009, 03:32:40 AM
CapsLockWizard, do you like to fish?
Poof... the fish is gone.... ::MonkeyWink::

 ::MonkeyHaHa::

the fish is not gone

Hi Caps.  Got anything to add regarding Kyle or John Silvetti?  Clyde Burke?  Jossy Mansur?  Eduardo Mansur? 

 ::MonkeyWink::



The saddest aspect of life right now is that science gathers knowledge faster than society gathers wisdom.

Just watch this week for the arrest of a major player of the game...and probably a big strike in the making and uproar in the house of Babylon.

Question: how many years did the USA took to get Gotti Convicted.?

So like a said: in colombia they call those that make information up to confuse the issues of this case a SAPO.

How can we hunt for lions while those on this net is working against the work at hand. Watch a movie is not like reading the book of the movie.

In the state the only thing that can be done right now is to pray...since those that scream the loudest are not in the field...but is try to confuse the world.

Things has happend but like I said before. A Sapo war is a lost war....

Remeber 911 ....the first attempt was that the basement, but then the media did give a whole information on how the building was done and how strong it was and where the weakest link were.....where is it now...

if we want to win we have to investigate and not pointing finger to those that are at work...

What ever kyle did and the OE did, I do not know, I was not there. I work alone with a group that can not be put at risk

What I hate the most of this site now is the way the information is twisted, but it is the same method that was use by those that made Natalee desapear, they twist the info.

If anyone to work on the case work on the case. but all that was said is said, we are not working in the future but with info that has been twisted in 2005 and need to be put back straight...

Investigate, but never assume and make thing up or cut and paste and reassamble what people said to proof your own view without knowing the real context in which that particular text was written or no even knowing what was the question to the origin of the text.

Every event in 2005 had a flow and when the truth is change, we allways will have a paradox. and I see it happend here in this forum also or should I call it SM Paradox.

Peter devries tried to put in in a movie but it does not compute, and so a lot is trying to assamble the story.

Read again what I say, how can you hunt lions without a local guide. and put your own magination those all that has tried to build a picture of this case;

and jumb the gun for some momement of sensation, they do not know the real truth, but they do not sit everyday in aruba and continue with the work at hand...all take carefully planning, and all seems to forget one thing, and that is in the question above...to know who (the corrupt Babylons) takes time, but go to war without knowing them is suicidal to all.

CAPS



CAPS...
Thank you for your reply.....
Help me though with this one question please....

I believed in what you were posting then, but I'd like you to respond to those questions so I can keep my faith in your theories...I often said that I think you have the "what happened to Natalee that night" and Kermit has the final disposal site of Natalee's remains....do I have that right?
Thank you.....
I still have to digest your reply above, but ask that you allow me to asks questions afterwords....
Thanks again CAPS....


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #789
Post by: billb's daughter on January 02, 2009, 03:59:24 AM
CapsLockWizard, do you like to fish?
Poof... the fish is gone.... ::MonkeyWink::

 ::MonkeyHaHa::

the fish is not gone

Hi Caps.  Got anything to add regarding Kyle or John Silvetti?  Clyde Burke?  Jossy Mansur?  Eduardo Mansur? 

 ::MonkeyWink::



The saddest aspect of life right now is that science gathers knowledge faster than society gathers wisdom.

Just watch this week for the arrest of a major player of the game...and probably a big strike in the making and uproar in the house of Babylon.

Question: how many years did the USA took to get Gotti Convicted.?

So like a said: in colombia they call those that make information up to confuse the issues of this case a SAPO.

How can we hunt for lions while those on this net is working against the work at hand. Watch a movie is not like reading the book of the movie.

In the state the only thing that can be done right now is to pray...since those that scream the loudest are not in the field...but is try to confuse the world.

Things has happend but like I said before. A Sapo war is a lost war....

Remeber 911 ....the first attempt was that the basement, but then the media did give a whole information on how the building was done and how strong it was and where the weakest link were.....where is it now...

if we want to win we have to investigate and not pointing finger to those that are at work...

What ever kyle did and the OE did, I do not know, I was not there. I work alone with a group that can not be put at risk

What I hate the most of this site now is the way the information is twisted, but it is the same method that was use by those that made Natalee desapear, they twist the info.

If anyone to work on the case work on the case. but all that was said is said, we are not working in the future but with info that has been twisted in 2005 and need to be put back straight...

Investigate, but never assume and make thing up or cut and paste and reassamble what people said to proof your own view without knowing the real context in which that particular text was written or no even knowing what was the question to the origin of the text.

Every event in 2005 had a flow and when the truth is change, we allways will have a paradox. and I see it happend here in this forum also or should I call it SM Paradox.

Peter devries tried to put in in a movie but it does not compute, and so a lot is trying to assamble the story.

Read again what I say, how can you hunt lions without a local guide. and put your own magination those all that has tried to build a picture of this case;

and jumb the gun for some momement of sensation, they do not know the real truth, but they do not sit everyday in aruba and continue with the work at hand...all take carefully planning, and all seems to forget one thing, and that is in the question above...to know who (the corrupt Babylons) takes time, but go to war without knowing them is suicidal to all.

CAPS



CAPS...
Thank you for your reply.....
Help me though with this one question please....

I believed in what you were posting then, but I'd like you to respond to those questions so I can keep my faith in your theories...I often said that I think you have the "what happened to Natalee that night" and Kermit has the final disposal site of Natalee's remains....do I have that right?
Thank you.....
I still have to digest your reply above, but ask that you allow me to asks questions afterwords....
Thanks again CAPS....
CAPS...
OK..my first blush review produces the following questions....
1. What is SAPO?
2. Things has happend but like I said before. A Sapo war is a lost war...
Goes to my first question..what is SAPO?
3. What ever kyle did and the OE did, I do not know, I was not there. I work alone with a group that can not be put at risk?
Your own posts says you met with John S....If I have this wrong, please let me know. Otherwise, please explain your relationship/interaction with John S., Kyle, Dave Holloway, Hotspot.
4. JQK/perhaps Greta/Hero B. will be in Aruba next week.... is your comment: "Just watch this week for the arrest of a major player of the game...and probably a big strike in the making and uproar in the house of Babylon." related to JQK< Greta, Hero B?
Thanks again CAPS.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #789
Post by: billb's daughter on January 02, 2009, 04:03:20 AM
Good night TM....


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #789
Post by: CapsLockWizard on January 02, 2009, 04:06:11 AM
CapsLockWizard, do you like to fish?
Poof... the fish is gone.... ::MonkeyWink::

 ::MonkeyHaHa::

the fish is not gone

Hi Caps.  Got anything to add regarding Kyle or John Silvetti?  Clyde Burke?  Jossy Mansur?  Eduardo Mansur? 

 ::MonkeyWink::



The saddest aspect of life right now is that science gathers knowledge faster than society gathers wisdom.

Just watch this week for the arrest of a major player of the game...and probably a big strike in the making and uproar in the house of Babylon.

Question: how many years did the USA took to get Gotti Convicted.?

So like a said: in colombia they call those that make information up to confuse the issues of this case a SAPO.

How can we hunt for lions while those on this net is working against the work at hand. Watch a movie is not like reading the book of the movie.

In the state the only thing that can be done right now is to pray...since those that scream the loudest are not in the field...but is try to confuse the world.

Things has happend but like I said before. A Sapo war is a lost war....

Remeber 911 ....the first attempt was that the basement, but then the media did give a whole information on how the building was done and how strong it was and where the weakest link were.....where is it now...

if we want to win we have to investigate and not pointing finger to those that are at work...

What ever kyle did and the OE did, I do not know, I was not there. I work alone with a group that can not be put at risk

What I hate the most of this site now is the way the information is twisted, but it is the same method that was use by those that made Natalee desapear, they twist the info.

If anyone to work on the case work on the case. but all that was said is said, we are not working in the future but with info that has been twisted in 2005 and need to be put back straight...

Investigate, but never assume and make thing up or cut and paste and reassamble what people said to proof your own view without knowing the real context in which that particular text was written or no even knowing what was the question to the origin of the text.

Every event in 2005 had a flow and when the truth is change, we allways will have a paradox. and I see it happend here in this forum also or should I call it SM Paradox.

Peter devries tried to put in in a movie but it does not compute, and so a lot is trying to assamble the story.

Read again what I say, how can you hunt lions without a local guide. and put your own magination those all that has tried to build a picture of this case;

and jumb the gun for some momement of sensation, they do not know the real truth, but they do not sit everyday in aruba and continue with the work at hand...all take carefully planning, and all seems to forget one thing, and that is in the question above...to know who (the corrupt Babylons) takes time, but go to war without knowing them is suicidal to all.

CAPS



CAPS...
Thank you for your reply.....
Help me though with this one question please....

I believed in what you were posting then, but I'd like you to respond to those questions so I can keep my faith in your theories...I often said that I think you have the "what happened to Natalee that night" and Kermit has the final disposal site of Natalee's remains....do I have that right?
Thank you.....
I still have to digest your reply above, but ask that you allow me to asks questions afterwords....
Thanks again CAPS....

1. Escudero cage is made of Iron and concrate iron mats...and its weight is around 500 pond or more.

2. Aruba fish cages or call it trap are for a fish called crapfish and Lobster like tail fish, it is made of PVC and with chicken coup wire mesh. it has to fin in a small fishing boat and be manageable to be lifted by the fisherman or 2 on the boat.

3. the cages in Aruba are put around the coastal area and where there are lot of rocks and reefs, not in an open ocean.


4. Now let look at post mortom issues, a body will start to decompose in 2 hours after dead and start building toxid gases. it will require professional handling.

5. we had 3 mayor close call horacain and the sea where that cage is was like a washing machine.

Question: do you know what will happend to fabrick in salt water for almost 3 year with constant stream, they loose color first since the die of jeans will become white in salt water and then will be decompose.

if it was fresh water, it will be come slimy then iit will start to build these bacteria that will make smell like someone just vomit (Acid smell)


now let go back to time

let assume that they put her in the cage at night...that means that they must had knowledge of the case prior and was well know to the exact cordination to go to that location , put in scuba gear, have some sort of referance or GPS location finder and dive at night and put it in the cage. Likely hood that that has happend in 2005? No. to much preparation.

assume that they did it the next day, then where will they have put the body that night to beat the post mortom process.?? ice in a badtube will not do it.

Asume that ALE put it some bones or object in the cage when OE was not looking, Why do that and what is the purpuse.

assume that whit ALE acction, What will be the benefit and to who? what will be their next move.

logic : Some one hid a body somewhere in a cage in Aruba ocean
A search for that cage was organised and started
a cage was found
the cage was empty on TV tumbs Down

PARADOX NOW

Go back to cage 7 day back and put in a body parts,  but you will then create a paradox here. you have it on tv to show the whole world that the cage was empty. (Paradox is where we tried to change an event that happend in the past.)

then we have to find why was the paradox created and who is it to its benefit.


CAPS




 






Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #789
Post by: texasmom on January 02, 2009, 04:17:30 AM
Good night TM....

Goodnight billb!   ::MonkeyCool:: 


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #789
Post by: billb's daughter on January 02, 2009, 04:50:40 AM
CapsLockWizard, do you like to fish?
Poof... the fish is gone.... ::MonkeyWink::

 ::MonkeyHaHa::

the fish is not gone

Hi Caps.  Got anything to add regarding Kyle or John Silvetti?  Clyde Burke?  Jossy Mansur?  Eduardo Mansur? 

 ::MonkeyWink::



The saddest aspect of life right now is that science gathers knowledge faster than society gathers wisdom.

Just watch this week for the arrest of a major player of the game...and probably a big strike in the making and uproar in the house of Babylon.

Question: how many years did the USA took to get Gotti Convicted.?

So like a said: in colombia they call those that make information up to confuse the issues of this case a SAPO.

How can we hunt for lions while those on this net is working against the work at hand. Watch a movie is not like reading the book of the movie.

In the state the only thing that can be done right now is to pray...since those that scream the loudest are not in the field...but is try to confuse the world.

Things has happend but like I said before. A Sapo war is a lost war....

Remeber 911 ....the first attempt was that the basement, but then the media did give a whole information on how the building was done and how strong it was and where the weakest link were.....where is it now...

if we want to win we have to investigate and not pointing finger to those that are at work...

What ever kyle did and the OE did, I do not know, I was not there. I work alone with a group that can not be put at risk

What I hate the most of this site now is the way the information is twisted, but it is the same method that was use by those that made Natalee desapear, they twist the info.

If anyone to work on the case work on the case. but all that was said is said, we are not working in the future but with info that has been twisted in 2005 and need to be put back straight...

Investigate, but never assume and make thing up or cut and paste and reassamble what people said to proof your own view without knowing the real context in which that particular text was written or no even knowing what was the question to the origin of the text.

Every event in 2005 had a flow and when the truth is change, we allways will have a paradox. and I see it happend here in this forum also or should I call it SM Paradox.

Peter devries tried to put in in a movie but it does not compute, and so a lot is trying to assamble the story.

Read again what I say, how can you hunt lions without a local guide. and put your own magination those all that has tried to build a picture of this case;

and jumb the gun for some momement of sensation, they do not know the real truth, but they do not sit everyday in aruba and continue with the work at hand...all take carefully planning, and all seems to forget one thing, and that is in the question above...to know who (the corrupt Babylons) takes time, but go to war without knowing them is suicidal to all.

CAPS



CAPS...
Thank you for your reply.....
Help me though with this one question please....

I believed in what you were posting then, but I'd like you to respond to those questions so I can keep my faith in your theories...I often said that I think you have the "what happened to Natalee that night" and Kermit has the final disposal site of Natalee's remains....do I have that right?
Thank you.....
I still have to digest your reply above, but ask that you allow me to asks questions afterwords....
Thanks again CAPS....

1. Escudero cage is made of Iron and concrate iron mats...and its weight is around 500 pond or more.

2. Aruba fish cages or call it trap are for a fish called crapfish and Lobster like tail fish, it is made of PVC and with chicken coup wire mesh. it has to fin in a small fishing boat and be manageable to be lifted by the fisherman or 2 on the boat.

3. the cages in Aruba are put around the coastal area and where there are lot of rocks and reefs, not in an open ocean.
you seem to be implying that the 500 lb Escudero cage was is the one we are all talking about and the persistence target that aruba divers may have recovered some contents


4. Now let look at post mortom issues, a body will start to decompose in 2 hours after dead and start building toxid gases. it will require professional handling.

5. we had 3 mayor close call horacain and the sea where that cage is was like a washing machine.

Question: do you know what will happend to fabrick in salt water for almost 3 year with constant stream, they loose color first since the die of jeans will become white in salt water and then will be decompose.
Agree. I find it hard to believe after 3 + years that there could be any colored fabric remaining in this environment
if it was fresh water, it will be come slimy then iit will start to build these bacteria that will make smell like someone just vomit (Acid smell)


now let go back to time

let assume that they put her in the cage at night...that means that they must had knowledge of the case prior and was well know to the exact cordination to go to that location , put in scuba gear, have some sort of referance or GPS location finder and dive at night and put it in the cage. Likely hood that that has happend in 2005? No. to much preparation.

assume that they did it the next day, then where will they have put the body that night to beat the post mortom process.?? ice in a badtube will not do it.

Asume that ALE put it some bones or object in the cage when OE was not looking, Why do that and what is the purpuse.
I don't see any purpose for ALE adding contents to the cage anytime...doesn't make sense to me. But Tim Miller declared on 30 Dec upon viewing ROV images that he believed he saw a shull...so much, he reportedly told Dave Holloway that he believed Natalee's remains were found.
assume that whit ALE acction, What will be the benefit and to who? what will be their next move.

logic : Some one hid a body somewhere in a cage in Aruba ocean
A search for that cage was organised and started
a cage was found
the cage was empty on TV tumbs Down
I don't assume that a thumbs down signal meant there was nothing in the cage...that is still open to lively debate.

PARADOX NOW

Go back to cage 7 day back and put in a body parts,  but you will then create a paradox here. you have it on tv to show the whole world that the cage was empty. (Paradox is where we tried to change an event that happend in the past.)

then we have to find why was the paradox created and who is it to its benefit.


CAPS




 





CAPS...I've added red comments to yout post above.
Are you saying that ALE put remains in the cage without the knowledge of the persistence crew/kyle?
What would be the purpose? Why hasn't ALE presented the contents of the cage then? Blackmail to keep some quiet? I don't follow..Please explain.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #789
Post by: texasmom on January 02, 2009, 05:15:44 AM
(http://i21.photobucket.com/albums/b258/texasmom55/Natalee66544.jpg)
JUSTICE FOR NATALEE!!!!


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #789
Post by: texasmom on January 02, 2009, 05:16:14 AM


Goodnight billb! 


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #789
Post by: billb's daughter on January 02, 2009, 05:20:12 AM


Goodnight billb! 
Goodnight TM...I love your post each night with Natalee's picture...That is why we are all here....Justice for Natalee...


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #789
Post by: billb's daughter on January 02, 2009, 05:35:14 AM
It is strange how the bungled fish trap investigation and the pond became merged. 

Is there something right before us that we are missing about all this?

BUMP

There is no connection IMHO  ::MonkeyNoNo::
I think they ARE linked. The pond was a diversion for what was really found in the cage. The pond was the VERY last thing searched by the Persitence crew. Did they purposely plant the cage evidence in the pond????

hmmm OK, they planted human remains, the remains of Natalee, from the sea cage into the Monserat pond?   I just can`t believe people are that evil.   No, i don`t believe that at all Wreck ::MonkeyNoNo::
Silvetti? Caps? No way, i don`t buy that.

Sounds like they were trying to frame Joran! 
Read ahead Monkeys...I think CAPS is proposing that Natalee's remains may have been planted by ALE during the persistence search w/o kyle/crew knowledge....still evolving....interesting..


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #789
Post by: billb's daughter on January 02, 2009, 05:37:22 AM
It is strange how the bungled fish trap investigation and the pond became merged. 

Is there something right before us that we are missing about all this?

BUMP

There is no connection IMHO  ::MonkeyNoNo::
I think they ARE linked. The pond was a diversion for what was really found in the cage. The pond was the VERY last thing searched by the Persitence crew. Did they purposely plant the cage evidence in the pond????

hmmm OK, they planted human remains, the remains of Natalee, from the sea cage into the Monserat pond?   I just can`t believe people are that evil.   No, i don`t believe that at all Wreck ::MonkeyNoNo::
Silvetti? Caps? No way, i don`t buy that.

Sounds like they were trying to frame Joran! 
Read ahead Monkeys...I think CAPS is proposing that Natalee's remains may have been planted by ALE during the persistence search w/o kyle/crew knowledge....still evolving....interesting..
OK..I always get this wrong...read behind this post, but ahead of the post I'm replying to..... ::MonkeyConfused::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #789
Post by: billb's daughter on January 02, 2009, 05:43:46 AM
Good night Bastibro...


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #789
Post by: bastibro on January 02, 2009, 05:53:26 AM
Good night Bastibro...

Good nigtht bilb,


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #789
Post by: billb's daughter on January 02, 2009, 05:56:17 AM
Goodnight Adoronron..


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #789
Post by: billb's daughter on January 02, 2009, 05:57:28 AM
Goodnight 5 quests viewing this site...


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #789
Post by: Buckeye on January 02, 2009, 06:11:41 AM
The cage does not sound like the usual cage, used for fishing/trapping "reef" fish, in Aruba.

The cage very well could be similar to those used for a drug post office.

OE (Kyle) was quite descriptive.  The cage had not been lowered with the 4 pt. harness.  You could tell it had been shoved off of something, by the way the ground was disturbed. He said it appeared to have been in the water the approximate time (three years) not a decade.

Maybe this "post office" had previously been discovered and confiscated.  Maybe this post office was being stored somewhere by the ALE, pulled out of storage, loaded on a boat and shoved off the boat, to clean up the "mess" and "save" the island. Maybe the contents (all the hermit crabs and plastic) needs to be hidden so no one knows the ALE were in on the cover up.

Maybe Natalee was wrapped in the blue plastic tarp and her skirt did not deteriorate at the rate expected.  God works in mysterious ways.

I think we must keep what we know (have pictures of) separate from the "how".  There are many reasons the JK2 didn't need scuba gear. We must keep what makes sense, to us, separate from what the "evidence" shows. Sometimes things don't make sense...for awhile...

What was in the bags?  Why was it retrieved, if it was nothing??  If it was nothing, why not say what it was?  IMO...it is something...


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #789
Post by: MumInOhio on January 02, 2009, 06:27:31 AM
Hi Tib...Happy New Year to you as well...Will switch our weather for a week or two!

SS......I have 2 different IPs on the same page of a thread in this Forum. I think I have a screen capture, if not I will make sure I do it. I also use more than one computer, so I have absolutely no idea what point Kermit has been trying to make. Especially now she professes to use 7...Oh...I guess she is now CIA, FBI or something... ::MonkeyWaa::

Remember ALE is watching. FBI too.  ::MonkeyEek::

Click on my profile and you can see a post of mine this morning about Caps posting from Aruba. It seems I was tracking Caps long before either Kermit and Jen, and Yes he was posting from Aruba. I have a heap of them saved.

By my calculations I have managed to squeeze in before all the "devices".  ::MonkeyWink::





Yes MUM I have 6 computers and a phone that I can log in with.
Mix it up as much as you want so you can come to conclusions that fit your agenda.



Kermit...From reading your fly by posts in Shango for over a year now, I am rapidly coming to the conclusion that you are the one that is mixing it up.

Long posts that are full of names and places that you think are part of a major conspiracy? Posts that can not be verified as having anything to do with anything in Natalee's case.

Posts with incorrect information posted so that some of us over there would make connections. Example: Montanja 10....Who lives there Kermit. Why would you let me waste my time believing that a friend of Joran and his family live at that address. If your post had not been corrected by another kind Monkey, I might still believe this to this day. I would have followed another direction in my research.

Here is another post of yours Kermit that on checking is totally incorrect and because of which posters on this Forum formed opinions...

Kermit(1/30/08)
I don't think he was gone for two hours just telling Paulus the family has arrived.
I think he was at a meeting with Paulus at the house for those couple of hours - fixing phones!Getting rid of evidence.Remember it was his board of director attorney, Lincoln Gomez who immediately came on Fox and gave interviews. Follow the connection of him and you'll see the disgusting pattern that is weaved and they usually end up at banks!
Remember I posted the picture of the CMB bank that Paulus went to make a deposit the next day, you know that is what most good dad's do when they have taken their son in for questioning is get to the bank!The bank is next to Digicel! Follow Charles Croes from the boss watch on Paulus wrist to Lincoln Gomez to Antonio Carlosto the paid shills online
it will all start to add up.[/i]

Kermit you have posted this info more thn once...and from what I recall of the discussions that followed, posters had Paulus going into the CMB Bank and next door to see Charles Croes about fixing phones.

A few weeks back I checked...
According to all the pictures of the CMB branches that is not the bank in Noord where Paulus said he went.
None of the pimps had Digicell phones, from the PVs they had Setar. 
Charles Croes works at the Airport for Aruba Fastphones.

So Kermit what is the purpose of this post, which as I said has been posted more than once? Just who is trying to confuse who here.

I will be back with the post I mentioned yesterday where you led some of us in Shango on a merry dance with information that could not be verified. The famous fly by? Days and days of research, hours and hours and pages and pages of posting.

My Agenda Kermit is the truth...It appears from some of your posts we may not have the same agenda...

Wreck...You were right...Some of us in Shango were duped.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #789
Post by: MumInOhio on January 02, 2009, 06:38:26 AM
Kermit...another thing...You have succeeded in pitting poster against poster.

Those that are for you and those of us that don't see things your way have an Agenda.

There has been nastiness in this cage that I would never have believed I would see.

Kermit...From what I see you are posting Your Opinions...You are entitled to them.

I do Not see things the way you do and I have formed my own opinions.

I have questioned your posts and pointed out your mistakes. I have every right to do this. None of us is right all the time, we all make mistakes. Except Kermit it seems.

 Keepthefaith...I believe I answered your question.

Have a Good Day Everyone...


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #789
Post by: bastibro on January 02, 2009, 06:47:16 AM
Kermit...another thing...You have succeeded in pitting poster against poster.

Those that are for you and those of us that don't see things your way have an Agenda.

There has been nastiness in this cage that I would never have believed I would see.

Kermit...From what I see you are posting Your Opinions...You are entitled to them.

I do Not see things the way you do and I have formed my own opinions.

I have questioned your posts and pointed out your mistakes. I have every right to do this. None of us is right all the time, we all make mistakes. Except Kermit it seems.

 Keepthefaith...I believe I answered your question.

Have a Good Day Everyone...

Have a very Good day MumInOhio, God Bless U . .


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #789
Post by: Buckeye on January 02, 2009, 07:05:37 AM
The largest "poster vs. poster" issue has been to "call out" Kermit.

What is wrong with just posting info, if it is different than what has been posted? 

I read Kermit posting Kyle's words.  If Kyle posted other words or different words, than just post those.

There may be good and differing opinions.  It is hard to get to them because instead of the "ideas" being posted, there is accusations regarding the "person" posting the idea.

A post about setar vs. digicel is interesting.  The psychological analysis of the original post is distasteful.  That is the poster vs. poster issue.  The posting of quotes and statements is not poster vs. poster.  If the problem is Kyle or Silvetti, just post something they said that contradicts the quotes posted.

I have been here a long time. Please give some credit.  I don't know of many here that would just believe what was said simply because of who said it. It isn't Kermit wins, you lose. 


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #789
Post by: wingnut on January 02, 2009, 08:10:00 AM
Does anyone have an idea at what point in the ocean search that the detective and his brother met with the Persistence crew?  I'm curious as to if it was before the search began...or at what point?

Kyle said: "Just before Christmas they are contacted by a detective and his brother who gave them information that turned out to be the correct latitude While we were searching shortly before Christmas, we were contacted by an Aruban detective who was involved in the Holloway case. He claimed that his brother had a vision about Natalee¢s body offshore and had coordinates. He and his brother agreed to meet on the Persistence. The detective¢s brother gave what he thought were coordinates, but turned out to be a line of latitude. This latitude aligned with Arashi beach and came within a half mile of the fish trap.


So, they were contacted around the time Caps started posting here.

And didn't Caps say that he himself dove down to the cage (meaning he knew exactly what the latitude/longitude of the cage was)?  The cage was still there, why didn't divers take the cage?  Also, caps says Salvetti said nothing in the cage except plastic-then WHY did they make a dive and retrieve all that "plastic" and then test something within the cage?


EXACTLY.  The contents are referred to as remains.  If it was just plastic, why would you collect it, bag it and sample it?  You wouldn't.  Additionally, the FBI sampled a piece of "fabric" that was sent to them by Richardson (though it took him TWO WEEKS to send it).  Not plastic.  FABRIC.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #789
Post by: MumInOhio on January 02, 2009, 08:13:08 AM
The largest "poster vs. poster" issue has been to "call out" Kermit.

What is wrong with just posting info, if it is different than what has been posted? 

I read Kermit posting Kyle's words.  If Kyle posted other words or different words, than just post those.

There may be good and differing opinions.  It is hard to get to them because instead of the "ideas" being posted, there is accusations regarding the "person" posting the idea.

A post about setar vs. digicel is interesting.  The psychological analysis of the original post is distasteful.  That is the poster vs. poster issue.  The posting of quotes and statements is not poster vs. poster.  If the problem is Kyle or Silvetti, just post something they said that contradicts the quotes posted.

I have been here a long time. Please give some credit.  I don't know of many here that would just believe what was said simply because of who said it. It isn't Kermit wins, you lose. 

Buckeye...I for one do not intend to respond to any more of Kermit's posts about my motives or agenda. I honestly don't care what Kermit thinks.

It is counter-productive, a diversion and a complete waste of time.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #789 1/1/09 -
Post by: MumInOhio on January 02, 2009, 08:24:37 AM
Kermit

7A Catiri

Here are some of many posts referencing 7A Catiri. Kermit posts that this is Freddy Zedan's address. She also posts that Frederick Arends is Freddy Zedan's father.



Re: SHANGO/SIMIAN - who are they and what did they know?
« Reply #2765 on: February 26, 2008, 07:17:21 PM » Kermit 



--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

T. J. Ward stated that Freddy lives behind Joran.
http://www.immob.biz/afdrukken.php?id=927〈=NL

http://www.arubachamber.com/DISKKLEINBEDRIJF31JULI2004.htm
The picture of Freddy's house, the address for the pic is 39F
but that is his mom's address on the chamber list for 2004.
Her address on the list as of 05/06/05 is Montanja 62.


19 Montanja Joran van der Sloot
232 Montanja Jaime Carrasquilla
7A Catiri Freddy Zedan Arambatziz

http://scaredmonkeys.net/index.php?topic=1952.msg355900#msg355900

Re: SHANGO/SIMIAN - who are they and what did they know? #2
« Reply #1724 on: April 09, 2008, 01:34:44 PM » Kermit
 

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

LaLa,

THINKING ABOUT THAT CATIRI APARTMENT:


MARTINA, Karen Theresa Paulina   – Allegedly was in porn video taped by Freddy.  Joran admits to having sex with her multiple times.  Was named by JQK as a date rape victim of Joran, but Tacopina claims she has said it was consensual


"I took the camera to Freddy’s house.
We delivered the camera to Freddy, and afterwards all four of us ate Chinese in the area of Freddy’s house. Freddy also lives in Montanja." (Satish Kalpoe Suspect Statement June 24, 2005.)

Name: Karen Martina
Date: 23 June 2005113:55
Pages: 6
Writer/Initiator: Dennis Jacobs / Juan Boezem
Description: witness statement by a friend of Van der Sloot and Arrambatzis

http://scaredmonkeys.net/index.php?topic=2733.msg372441#msg372441

Re: SHANGO/SIMIAN - who are they and what did they know? #3
« Reply #290 on: April 19, 2008, 12:25:24 AM » Kermit


CAPS,

Atan Lee's residence
converted to “ The Silvia Residence.”
the beautiful home of Arubas former Chief of Protocol, Mr. Atan Lee.

The Lee’s family invites guests to their home in Catiri,

During these decades the coordination of these pageants passed through different organizers however since 1992 Star Promotion, founded by Mr. Atan Lee

Remember I said I think that Knockout Model Agency is a front for something else.
And these pageants seem to have the hoteliers and Chief of Protocol involved.

DVDLand & CD,
Catiri 7-A
Noord
Aruba
It's about 5 minutes from the high rise hotels


from the Bug Tour that leads to Atan Lee House there is this Rental House
which is located in the Malmok area on L.G Smith Blvd., one mile from the high-rise hotels.


Now add to this:
Satish took a camera to Freddy
Joran said in his book they would get a room to have sex and videotape girls.

http://scaredmonkeys.net/index.php?topic=2787.msg375066#msg375066


Re: SHANGO/SIMIAN - who are they and what did they know? #4
« Reply #2 on: June 03, 2008, 07:23:00 PM » Kermit 


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

old info from my files, don't know if it is of any use for ya'll


finngirl11
Monkey Junkey
Joined: 31 Jul 2005
Location: Northern Utah
PostPosted: Sun Aug 28, 2005 4:47 am    Post subject:    Add User to Ignore List Reply with quote

http://www.planethuff.com/darkside/archives/cat_the_vanishing_of_natalee_holloway.html
Official Charges on Freddy:
Intentionally distribute and show sexual images of a minor
Intercourse with someone he knows is unconscious

finngirl11
Monkey Junkey
Joined: 31 Jul 2005
Location: Northern Utah
   
PostPosted: Sun Aug 28, 2005 4:47 am    Post subject:    Add User to Ignore List Reply with quote

http://www.planethuff.com/darkside/archives/cat_the_vanishing_of_natalee_holloway.html


Geraldo: Tell me about the young woman

Helen: She is a minor, so I won’t say anything about her. She has been involved in whatever the young man is being accused of right now sexual harassment..assault, whatever you want to call it. She is not the only one, the news we are getting right now is there are sex films and they have been selling them. I think it is a little bigger than even we expect as far as information I am getting right now.

Geraldo: Helen, do you know whether the authorities have seized the DVDs?

Helen: I don’t know that, they do have something, otherwise they would not have made these charges
http://www.scaredmonkeys.com/2005/08/28/transcripts-from-geraldo-sat-night-official-charges-against-freddie/
http://www.exposetheleft.com/2005/08/28/helenvinda/

Here is a fox news story about Freddy Arambatzis, note that photos are mentioned and not video. the girl was a minor, and I heard several comments about a video tape being sold around their circle of friends of this girl. Tickle site is down, he was locoman pimp.
http://tinyurl.com/gb627
http://www.scaredmonkeys.com/2006/04/28/aruba-natalee-holloway-comment-post-26/#comments

Simian Says:
June 29th, 2005 at 4:18 pm
4:29 post
JVDS and Kalpoes are involved in prostitution/drugs ring themselves, not just getting dope from the dealers



Sillymonkey Freddy and Jaime were listed on Joran's sites as his "best friends." Jaime is the one who some of the MB kids emailed after. When they asked about Natalee, he unleased a bunch of vile garbage and said she got what she deserved. I think the kids then read him the riot act and passed his emails along to the FBI.

Jamie is Columbian
Freddy is Venezulean

Frederick Jacinthus Arends of DVD Land & CD is his father?

The picture of Freddy's house, I know the address for the pic is 39F
but that is his mom's address on the chamber list for 2004.
Her address on the list as of 05/06/05 is Montanja 62.
So where was he residing when Natalee went missing and where does he currently live?


Arambatzis
ARAMBATZIS-RODRIGUEZ ALBERT     LILIAN REGINA     MONTANJA     39-F
http://www.arubachamber.com/DISKKLEINBEDRIJF31JULI2004.htm


#39-F Montana (Montanja), Noord

Freddy’s house:
7A Catiri (apartment)

MOm's address is: 62 Montana is ARAMBATZIS-RODRIGUEZ address in NOORD

http://209.157.64.201/focus/f-backroom/1471591/posts

http://www.immob.biz/?p=alles&id=927&lang=NL
http://www.google.com/search?q=ARAMBATZIS+aruba&hl=en&lr=&rls=GGLG,GGLG:2005-33,GGLG:en&tab=nw&ie=UTF-8&sa=N

T. J. Ward stated that Freddy lives behind Joran.

Adres: Montana 39F en 39G
MONTANA, ARUBA (ARUBA) Vraagprijs: € 221.000

http://scaredmonkeys.net/index.php?topic=2886.msg386608;topicseen#msg386608


Re: SHANGO/SIMIAN - who are they and what did they know? #4
« Reply #10 on: June 04, 2008, 05:46:58 PM » Kermit 


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

"I took the camera to Freddy’s house.
We delivered the camera to Freddy, and afterwards all four of us ate Chinese in the area of Freddy’s house. Freddy also lives in Montanja." (Satish Kalpoe Suspect Statement June 24, 2005.)

Zedan Arambatzis – age 21 in 2005
Joran met Freddy Zedan Arambatzis when Freddy was 19, they met during a tournament at the racquetball club. (source:p. 1 Jorans book)
Freddy is a light colored latino from Venezuela that only spoke papi. (source: p. 1 Joran's book)
Freddy's English sucked (source p. 5 Joran's book)
I am the best friend and neighbor of Joran. We got to know each other about two years ago.(source: June 12 Freddy's statement as written in Joran's book)
Freddy lives behind Joran.( D-6/11)

19 Montanja Joran van der Sloot
232 Montanja Jaime Carrasquilla
7A Catiri Freddy Zedan Arambatziz

http://scaredmonkeys.net/index.php?topic=2886.msg386884#msg386884

Re: SHANGO/SIMIAN - who are they and what did they know? #4
« Reply #400 on: June 25, 2008, 06:38:31 AM » Lalas 


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Freddy, Freddy, Freddy...I think the Montanja address was more his mother's address than his.  Kermit keeps leading us to the Catiri address anytime we venture to the Montanja address.   I may not have very good instincts about Shango but Kermit is usually right on target when he says something.  Freddy was supposed to be at Joran's that night.  The only reason he would have been there was to make a video.  Freddy was way too old to be having a sleepover with Joran...unless sleeping with someone was involved. JMO

Right Mum!

Simian protects Steve.
Shango protects Freddy.
Now put it together and you have your answers. Albeit, that involves a whole host of other people down the line.

http://scaredmonkeys.net/index.php?topic=2886.msg393231#msg393231

Re: SHANGO/SIMIAN - who are they and what did they know? #4
« Reply #398 on: June 25, 2008, 05:48:34 AM » Finngirl


so what happened to Freddy's Montanja 39-F addy ...
listed in the buki di during august 2005?

sometimes I feel like someone has re-arranged the furniture
while I was sleeping and I wake up/head for the light switch
and stumble into something that wasn't in the way last night

we had real estate/for sale photos at one time
showing the Montanja townhouses numbered 39A thru G or H

couldn't find/didn't want to find: two different things

http://scaredmonkeys.net/index.php?topic=2886.msg393222;topicseen#msg393222


Kermit...You do remember where this all led, don't you? Pages of discussions on DVDLand, Freddy Zedan, Frederick Arends culminating in a revelation by Caps?

Kermit...You planted this seed.

Now please show me the connection of Freddy Zedan to Frederick Arends. I want back up. I want proof. I want absolutely no questions left that Frederick Arends is Freddy Zedan's father, otherwise all you have is speculation.  





Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #789 1/1/09 -
Post by: MumInOhio on January 02, 2009, 08:31:48 AM
Thank You Bastibro...I will and You do the same.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #789
Post by: Blonde on January 02, 2009, 08:49:40 AM

blonde:

when you come back
could you post the photo of finbar
w/ his bro?

IIRC fin is the good-looking one

(tried search function but couldn't find photo)

TIA



Finngirl I miss his so much.
He use to make me laugh so hard.
Remember he the good looking one, in this picture.


(http://i18.photobucket.com/albums/b104/Blondeonahd/Fun%20stuff/huh.jpg)


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #789 1/1/09 -
Post by: wreck on January 02, 2009, 09:16:33 AM
Please Caps, I WANT to understand. Are you saying there were 2 different traps? Are you saying that what Tim Miller saw on the 29th was different than what was retrieved on Jan. 7th? Are you saying that evidence was found in the pond FIRST -- then moved to the cage(s)?


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #789 1/1/09 -
Post by: SS on January 02, 2009, 09:52:39 AM
Thank you Caps.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #789
Post by: Blue Moon on January 02, 2009, 10:03:15 AM
The largest "poster vs. poster" issue has been to "call out" Kermit.

What is wrong with just posting info, if it is different than what has been posted? 

I read Kermit posting Kyle's words.  If Kyle posted other words or different words, than just post those.

There may be good and differing opinions.  It is hard to get to them because instead of the "ideas" being posted, there is accusations regarding the "person" posting the idea.

A post about setar vs. digicel is interesting.  The psychological analysis of the original post is distasteful.  That is the poster vs. poster issue.  The posting of quotes and statements is not poster vs. poster.  If the problem is Kyle or Silvetti, just post something they said that contradicts the quotes posted.

I have been here a long time. Please give some credit.  I don't know of many here that would just believe what was said simply because of who said it. It isn't Kermit wins, you lose. 

I agree Buckeye.  It is not like most of us had not had serious questions of what was going on with the crew of the Persistence when this was all unraveling.  It was all a "WTF" moment with how it all came down and we were left standing with our mouths wide open.  Kyle's silence in all of this says it all to me.  I have lots of questions for a lot of people and right now they are not giving out answers.  Imagine what Natalee's family is questioning right now.  Their daughter is gone and now it appears the last change to bring her back has been lost.  It should NOT have gone down that way. (JMO)


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #789
Post by: caesu on January 02, 2009, 10:09:43 AM
Isn't it tomorrow that JQK and Hero Brinkman and Greta are
to descend on Aruba?

the Dutch Members of Parliament (including Brinkman) are travelling first to Curaçao today (January 2nd).

then on to Aruba, with meetings from January 5th until January 9th.
on January 11th they travel back to The Netherlands.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #789
Post by: Blue Moon on January 02, 2009, 10:11:19 AM
Isn't it tomorrow that JQK and Hero Brinkman and Greta are
to descend on Aruba?

the Dutch Members of Parliament (including Brinkman) are travelling first to Curaçao today (January 2nd).

then on to Aruba, with meetings from January 5th until January 9th.
on January 11th they travel back to The Netherlands.

Caesu, what is Hero's agenda in Aruba?  We are thinking John Q. Kelly/Greta-Fox News will be in Aruba with him.  Thanks.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #789
Post by: San on January 02, 2009, 10:15:45 AM
The largest "poster vs. poster" issue has been to "call out" Kermit.

What is wrong with just posting info, if it is different than what has been posted? 

I read Kermit posting Kyle's words.  If Kyle posted other words or different words, than just post those.

There may be good and differing opinions.  It is hard to get to them because instead of the "ideas" being posted, there is accusations regarding the "person" posting the idea.


A post about setar vs. digicel is interesting.  The psychological analysis of the original post is distasteful.  That is the poster vs. poster issue.  The posting of quotes and statements is not poster vs. poster.  If the problem is Kyle or Silvetti, just post something they said that contradicts the quotes posted.

I have been here a long time. Please give some credit.  I don't know of many here that would just believe what was said simply because of who said it. It isn't Kermit wins, you lose. 

I agree Buckeye.  There is nothing wrong with different opinions.  We can't all agree that just isn't going to happen.  All we can do is read what a poster has given us and come to our own conclusion.

A particular poster chose to post on two different boards.  This has caused a tremendous amount of doubt with what he said.  His words are being compared to what he wrote and said on both sites.  So now in our minds we are trying to sort it out and see what the truth is.

We would have never known what he said if Kermit didn't bring that information here to show everyone.

So until I see further proof of what he said is being manipulated to fit someone agenda then I will have to say I still stand with the frog.

Is that such a bad thing to do.  Some think he is wrong and some think he is right.  Let the chips fall where they may and when the dust clears let's see who is still standing.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #789 1/1/09 -
Post by: San on January 02, 2009, 10:16:33 AM
In the end we are looking for the truth.

"Truth Exists"


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #789
Post by: caesu on January 02, 2009, 10:47:30 AM
Isn't it tomorrow that JQK and Hero Brinkman and Greta are
to descend on Aruba?

the Dutch Members of Parliament (including Brinkman) are travelling first to Curaçao today (January 2nd).

then on to Aruba, with meetings from January 5th until January 9th.
on January 11th they travel back to The Netherlands.

Caesu, what is Hero's agenda in Aruba?  We are thinking John Q. Kelly/Greta-Fox News will be in Aruba with him.  Thanks.

i hope that's the case, but i don't know.

Aruba sure hasn't forgotten that Brinkman called them 'as corrupt as hell' on FOX last month.
so i expect some fireworks when Brinkman arrives on Aruba on or before January 5th.
when that gets media attention Brinkman can use that to stir things up even more.
if he does that together with JQK/Greta the effect will be even greater.

it's great opportunity for a lot of (international) media attention.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #789 1/1/09 -
Post by: Tamikosmom on January 02, 2009, 10:48:56 AM
Beth Holloway's brother recognized early on that the Aruban connection implies that the Persistence undertaking would come to naught in regards to justice for Natalee Holloway and closure for her family.

Janet

______


private eye
Re: Natalee Case Discussion #742 3/10 -
« Reply #686 on: March 13, 2008, 06:38:07 PM »


Unfortunately, those trusted with the evidence of the investigation were not good stewards of the evidence. Evidence has been destroyed, search activities delayed with no site protection accomplished by the authorities, and interrogations have been stopped at key points and the person being interrogated allowed to be counseled by parents and attorneys, and interrogations have been stopped just short of key questions being asked when the flow of good information was beginning to come out.

Prisoners being isolated have been furnished cell phones and communication has been allowed to occur between locked up and the free.

Do I think psychics are the answer? No.

But sharing information with people who work for people who are directly orchestrating the cover up, Rudy, or the Dutch, is the most irresponsible investigating I can imagine.  What kills this investigation is people having to come into it, wanting to apply basic investigatory protocols into place, and then having those channels sabotage the new evidence that the new players discover. Of course, as is happened everytime in this case, the new people eventually come to a point where the manipulation of the evidence is undeniable, but by then the fruits of their work are gone, and there is simply another member of the believers of the cover up group. What I pray that Kyle and the crew of the Persistence will determine, is that  regardless of how hard working the man that they are working with appears to work, his work belongs to Rudy, and Rudy belongs to the local dutch.  

We are not hysterical, ignorant, paranoid people. We have seen the cover up in action, in broad daylight, with impunity, and if you disregard our warnings, you will become the next chump in a series of chumps, no matter how sophisticated your equipment, the level of your educational achievement, or the extent of your job skills and work history.

http://scaredmonkeys.net/index.php?topic=2689.msg364750#msg364750


Tamikosmom
Re: Natalee Case Discussion #742 3/10 -
« Reply #767 on: March 14, 2008, 01:07:35 AM »


PI ... those who are on a quest for the truth regarding what happened to Natalee Holloway should read Dave Holloway's book "Corruption in Paradise" and Beth Holloway's book "Loving Natalee" prior to being deceived that "Aruban authories" are about to assist them in their quest.

Janet

http://scaredmonkeys.net/index.php?topic=2689.msg364881#msg364881




Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #789
Post by: Blue Moon on January 02, 2009, 10:51:49 AM
Isn't it tomorrow that JQK and Hero Brinkman and Greta are
to descend on Aruba?

the Dutch Members of Parliament (including Brinkman) are travelling first to Curaçao today (January 2nd).

then on to Aruba, with meetings from January 5th until January 9th.
on January 11th they travel back to The Netherlands.

Caesu, what is Hero's agenda in Aruba?  We are thinking John Q. Kelly/Greta-Fox News will be in Aruba with him.  Thanks.

i hope that's the case, but i don't know.

Aruba sure hasn't forgotten that Brinkman called them 'as corrupt as hell' on FOX last month.
so i expect some fireworks when Brinkman arrives on Aruba on or before January 5th.
when that gets media attention Brinkman can use that to stir things up even more.
if he does that together with JQK/Greta the effect will be even greater.

it's great opportunity for a lot of (international) media attention.

I agree about international media attention.  That would be great.  Everyone needs a hero, I hope Hero is Natalee's hero.  She and her family need one.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #789 1/1/09 -
Post by: KYcat on January 02, 2009, 11:07:54 AM
Beth Holloway's brother recognized early on that the Aruban connection implies that the Persistence undertaking would come to naught in regards to justice for Natalee Holloway and closure for her family.

Janet

______


private eye
Re: Natalee Case Discussion #742 3/10 -
« Reply #686 on: March 13, 2008, 06:38:07 PM »


Unfortunately, those trusted with the evidence of the investigation were not good stewards of the evidence. Evidence has been destroyed, search activities delayed with no site protection accomplished by the authorities, and interrogations have been stopped at key points and the person being interrogated allowed to be counseled by parents and attorneys, and interrogations have been stopped just short of key questions being asked when the flow of good information was beginning to come out.

Prisoners being isolated have been furnished cell phones and communication has been allowed to occur between locked up and the free.

Do I think psychics are the answer? No.

But sharing information with people who work for people who are directly orchestrating the cover up, Rudy, or the Dutch, is the most irresponsible investigating I can imagine.  What kills this investigation is people having to come into it, wanting to apply basic investigatory protocols into place, and then having those channels sabotage the new evidence that the new players discover. Of course, as is happened everytime in this case, the new people eventually come to a point where the manipulation of the evidence is undeniable, but by then the fruits of their work are gone, and there is simply another member of the believers of the cover up group. What I pray that Kyle and the crew of the Persistence will determine, is that  regardless of how hard working the man that they are working with appears to work, his work belongs to Rudy, and Rudy belongs to the local dutch.  

We are not hysterical, ignorant, paranoid people. We have seen the cover up in action, in broad daylight, with impunity, and if you disregard our warnings, you will become the next chump in a series of chumps, no matter how sophisticated your equipment, the level of your educational achievement, or the extent of your job skills and work history.

http://scaredmonkeys.net/index.php?topic=2689.msg364750#msg364750


Tamikosmom
Re: Natalee Case Discussion #742 3/10 -
« Reply #767 on: March 14, 2008, 01:07:35 AM »


PI ... those who are on a quest for the truth regarding what happened to Natalee Holloway should read Dave Holloway's book "Corruption in Paradise" and Beth Holloway's book "Loving Natalee" prior to being deceived that "Aruban authories" are about to assist them in their quest.

Janet

http://scaredmonkeys.net/index.php?topic=2689.msg364881#msg364881




Tomikosmom Thank you for bringing this over again.  Anyone who doubts what was going on in the search of the Persistence needs to read the words of PI again.  I think he states it quite clearly.  And anyone who thinks they are in the know, maybe you are and maybe you are not, but I believe that the family knows more.

MOO


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #789
Post by: Blue Moon on January 02, 2009, 11:10:09 AM
CapsLockWizard, do you like to fish?
Poof... the fish is gone.... ::MonkeyWink::

 ::MonkeyHaHa::

the fish is not gone

Hi Caps.  Got anything to add regarding Kyle or John Silvetti?  Clyde Burke?  Jossy Mansur?  Eduardo Mansur? 

 ::MonkeyWink::



The saddest aspect of life right now is that science gathers knowledge faster than society gathers wisdom.  It has been almost 4 years and it looks like it is no closer to being solved-We do feel we know who is corrupt.

Just watch this week for the arrest of a major player of the game...and probably a big strike in the making and uproar in the house of Babylon. Believe me I will be watching.  Hope you are right on this one.

Question: how many years did the USA took to get Gotti Convicted.? Natalee was an American girl only on her high school graduation, not a Mob boss. This is a simple crime by simple Pimps who had help from people in the government of Aruba. Nothing more, nothing less.

So like a said: in colombia they call those that make information up to confuse the issues of this case a SAPO.

How can we hunt for lions while those on this net is working against the work at hand. Watch a movie is not like reading the book of the movie. Natalee's story HAS to stay in the minds of the American people or she will fade away and we DO NOT want that to happen

In the state the only thing that can be done right now is to pray...since those that scream the loudest are not in the field...but is try to confuse the world.

Things has happend but like I said before. A Sapo war is a lost war....  What is a Sapo war? clarification please

Remeber 911 ....the first attempt was that the basement, but then the media did give a whole information on how the building was done and how strong it was and where the weakest link were.....where is it now...

if we want to win we have to investigate and not pointing finger to those that are at work...

What ever kyle did and the OE did, I do not know, I was not there. I work alone with a group that can not be put at risk  Hotshot put you in touch with Kyle, WHY?

What I hate the most of this site now is the way the information is twisted, but it is the same method that was use by those that made Natalee desapear, they twist the info.

If anyone to work on the case work on the case. but all that was said is said, we are not working in the future but with info that has been twisted in 2005 and need to be put back straight...

Investigate, but never assume and make thing up or cut and paste and reassamble what people said to proof your own view without knowing the real context in which that particular text was written or no even knowing what was the question to the origin of the text.  Asking questions will only get answers if people are willing to do it.

Every event in 2005 had a flow and when the truth is change, we allways will have a paradox. and I see it happend here in this forum also or should I call it SM Paradox.

Peter devries tried to put in in a movie but it does not compute, and so a lot is trying to assamble the story.

Read again what I say, how can you hunt lions without a local guide. and put your own magination those all that has tried to build a picture of this case;

and jumb the gun for some momement of sensation, they do not know the real truth, but they do not sit everyday in aruba and continue with the work at hand...all take carefully planning, and all seems to forget one thing, and that is in the question above...to know who (the corrupt Babylons) takes time, but go to war without knowing them is suicidal to all.

CAPS




My response in red.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #789
Post by: KYcat on January 02, 2009, 11:12:10 AM
The largest "poster vs. poster" issue has been to "call out" Kermit.

What is wrong with just posting info, if it is different than what has been posted? 

I read Kermit posting Kyle's words.  If Kyle posted other words or different words, than just post those.

There may be good and differing opinions.  It is hard to get to them because instead of the "ideas" being posted, there is accusations regarding the "person" posting the idea.


A post about setar vs. digicel is interesting.  The psychological analysis of the original post is distasteful.  That is the poster vs. poster issue.  The posting of quotes and statements is not poster vs. poster.  If the problem is Kyle or Silvetti, just post something they said that contradicts the quotes posted.

I have been here a long time. Please give some credit.  I don't know of many here that would just believe what was said simply because of who said it. It isn't Kermit wins, you lose. 

I agree Buckeye.  There is nothing wrong with different opinions.  We can't all agree that just isn't going to happen.  All we can do is read what a poster has given us and come to our own conclusion.

A particular poster chose to post on two different boards.  This has caused a tremendous amount of doubt with what he said.  His words are being compared to what he wrote and said on both sites.  So now in our minds we are trying to sort it out and see what the truth is.

We would have never known what he said if Kermit didn't bring that information here to show everyone.

So until I see further proof of what he said is being manipulated to fit someone agenda then I will have to say I still stand with the frog.

Is that such a bad thing to do.  Some think he is wrong and some think he is right.  Let the chips fall where they may and when the dust clears let's see who is still standing.

Sorry for the quote stacks but these two posts say it all in my opinion. 

Thank You. 

 ::MonkeyCool::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #789 1/1/09 -
Post by: wreck on January 02, 2009, 11:13:59 AM
Please Caps, I WANT to understand. Are you saying there were 2 different traps? Are you saying that what Tim Miller saw on the 29th was different than what was retrieved on Jan. 7th? Are you saying that evidence was found in the pond FIRST -- then moved to the cage(s)?
^^^BUMP^^^
So what do you all think he was telling us?


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #789 1/1/09 -
Post by: Blue Moon on January 02, 2009, 11:18:31 AM
Please Caps, I WANT to understand. Are you saying there were 2 different traps? Are you saying that what Tim Miller saw on the 29th was different than what was retrieved on Jan. 7th? Are you saying that evidence was found in the pond FIRST -- then moved to the cage(s)?
^^^BUMP^^^
So what do you all think he was telling us?

Sorry but I think he is telling us to BUTT out and mind our own business and Kermit doesn't know what she is talking about.  Riddles at this point does not intrigue me anymore.  Get on with it or butt out.  4 years is too long to give any government/police a change to get it right.  Simple crime, it should have been solved from the very beginning. Give Natalee's body back to her family for a proper burial and do what they need to do to solve this crime AFTER returning her.  Quit holding her hostage.  It is time for her to come home.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #789 1/1/09 -
Post by: KYcat on January 02, 2009, 11:18:34 AM

snipped>>>

Quote from: CapsLockWizard on Today at 02:17:45 AM

Just watch this week for the arrest of a major player of the game...and probably a big strike in the making and uproar in the house of Babylon. Believe me I will be watching.  Hope you are right on this one.


Yes, we will be watching.  There have been so many things promised that never materialized, I hope that this happens.  If it doesn't, do we deserve an explanation as to why it didn't or what happened? 

I, for one, am waiting.




Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #789
Post by: truthseeker2 on January 02, 2009, 11:18:35 AM
Kermit...another thing...You have succeeded in pitting poster against poster.

Those that are for you and those of us that don't see things your way have an Agenda.

There has been nastiness in this cage that I would never have believed I would see.

Kermit...From what I see you are posting Your Opinions...You are entitled to them.

I do Not see things the way you do and I have formed my own opinions.

I have questioned your posts and pointed out your mistakes. I have every right to do this. None of us is right all the time, we all make mistakes. Except Kermit it seems.

 Keepthefaith...I believe I answered your question.

Have a Good Day Everyone...

I gotta start getting up earlier.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #789
Post by: Tamikosmom on January 02, 2009, 11:21:36 AM

CAPS...I've added red comments to yout post above.
Are you saying that ALE put remains in the cage without the knowledge of the persistence crew/kyle?
What would be the purpose? Why hasn't ALE presented the contents of the cage then? Blackmail to keep some quiet? I don't follow..Please explain.

Kyle Kingman held a professional position on board the Persistence and ... his own words on the Natalee's Freebirds' forum tells the truth regarding the happenings encompassing the trap/cage.  Kyle may now be distancing himselves from his posts submitted the the Natalee's Freebirds' forum but ... you know the expession ... "You can deny your belly botton but ... every time you look down it is there".

It is my opinion that CAPS has been placed on the SM forum in January by Aruban higher ups to distract from the contents of the trap/cage ... that ALE had just taken possession of ... by diverting attention to other locations where Natalee Holloway's remains.

Janet

__________

KYLE KINGMAN - PRIVATE FORUM

Kyle:
THis is what I'm trying to figure out now. I need to know the leak! I believe Caps is only one step away from DirtyHand


CapsLockWizard
Re: Natalee Case Discussion #780 11/26/08 -
« Reply #931 on: December 03, 2008, 04:19:56 AM »


<snipped?

Another thing , I went to dive a week a go to the same location, and the Cage is still there. If the cage was evidance in a murder case, why is it still in the water.

Another thing, from 2005 to 2008, we has gone through several mayor stroms that has pull sunken boat more heavy than the cage and in depth more than the cage to shore.

The cage has an Owner and is not Aruban  nor Venezuelan  and not Dutch. it is from a Colombian person and the use has it purpuse.

<snipped>

CAPS

http://scaredmonkeys.net/index.php?topic=4182.msg564838;topicseen#msg564838


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #789 1/1/09 -
Post by: KYcat on January 02, 2009, 11:25:46 AM
Johan555, can you give us any insight into what CAPS is referring to regarding an arrest this week of a major player of the game?



Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #789
Post by: Blue Moon on January 02, 2009, 11:26:20 AM

CAPS...I've added red comments to yout post above.
Are you saying that ALE put remains in the cage without the knowledge of the persistence crew/kyle?
What would be the purpose? Why hasn't ALE presented the contents of the cage then? Blackmail to keep some quiet? I don't follow..Please explain.

Kyle Kingman held a professional position on board the Persistence and ... his own words on the Natalee's Freebirds' forum tells the truth regarding the happenings encompassing the trap/cage.  Kyle may now be distancing himselves from his posts submitted the the Natalee's Freebirds' forum but ... you know the expession ... "You can deny your belly botton but ... every time you look down it is there".

It is my opinion that CAPS has been placed on the SM forum in January by Aruban higher ups to distract from the contents of the trap/cage ... that ALE had just taken possession of ... by diverting attention to other locations where Natalee Holloway's remains.

Janet

__________

KYLE KINGMAN - PRIVATE FORUM

Kyle:
THis is what I'm trying to figure out now. I need to know the leak! I believe Caps is only one step away from DirtyHand


CapsLockWizard
Re: Natalee Case Discussion #780 11/26/08 -
« Reply #931 on: December 03, 2008, 04:19:56 AM »


<snipped?

Another thing , I went to dive a week a go to the same location, and the Cage is still there. If the cage was evidance in a murder case, why is it still in the water.

Another thing, from 2005 to 2008, we has gone through several mayor stroms that has pull sunken boat more heavy than the cage and in depth more than the cage to shore.

The cage has an Owner and is not Aruban  nor Venezuelan  and not Dutch. it is from a Colombian person and the use has it purpuse.

<snipped>

CAPS

http://scaredmonkeys.net/index.php?topic=4182.msg564838;topicseen#msg564838


Janet, these two quotes really bother me.  First Caps is only one step away from DirtyHand AND caps dove down to the location the cage was.  Is Caps the brother of DirtyHand? Just thinking out loud here.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #789 1/1/09 -
Post by: KYcat on January 02, 2009, 11:27:48 AM
Well, Johan and CAPS both left.  You know, I am tired of every time I ask a question to certain people they leave.  Maybe he left before I posted, I don't know.  But I had this same problem with OE before.

Just sayin..........



Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #789
Post by: truthseeker2 on January 02, 2009, 11:35:57 AM
Isn't it tomorrow that JQK and Hero Brinkman and Greta are
to descend on Aruba?

the Dutch Members of Parliament (including Brinkman) are travelling first to Curaçao today (January 2nd).

then on to Aruba, with meetings from January 5th until January 9th.
on January 11th they travel back to The Netherlands.

Thanks, caesu.  Maybe some sparks will begin to fly in the Caribbean this coming week!


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #789 1/1/09 -
Post by: KYcat on January 02, 2009, 11:36:47 AM
Well, since I am on a roll , I agree with BlueMoon that CAPS is pretty much telling us to Butt out.  Evidently we don't know what we are talking about.  We are not in the know.  I guess they are at their private site discussing what everyone is talking about here.  Glad we are worthy of discussing.

Just makes me mad that we get drivebys, if you are going to discuss this case here, THEN DISCUSS THE CASE HERE, not behind our backs.

Mods, you can delete if inappropriate, (I guess I didn't have to tell you that  ::MonkeyWink::)





Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #789 1/1/09 -
Post by: Buckeye on January 02, 2009, 11:42:23 AM
Please Caps, I WANT to understand. Are you saying there were 2 different traps? Are you saying that what Tim Miller saw on the 29th was different than what was retrieved on Jan. 7th? Are you saying that evidence was found in the pond FIRST -- then moved to the cage(s)?
^^^BUMP^^^
So what do you all think he was telling us?

and I always thought Papiamentu was difficult...

I think Caps likes the pond idea.  It is interesting that the detective and his "vision" brother, or whatever, knew some of the basic location of the cage, before the dive.  Then the comment about decomposition (I don't agree that it starts in two hrs...especially if she was shaded or buried)...maybe he is trying to say that Natalee was taken from one place (fresh water/pond?) and placed in large cage...would still have "slime" and jean material available....but not if material had been in salt water for three years... :smt102


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #789 1/1/09 -
Post by: San on January 02, 2009, 11:42:44 AM
Well, since I am on a roll , I agree with BlueMoon that CAPS is pretty much telling us to Butt out.  Evidently we don't know what we are talking about.  We are not in the know.  I guess they are at their private site discussing what everyone is talking about here.  Glad we are worthy of discussing.

Just makes me mad that we get drivebys, if you are going to discuss this case here, THEN DISCUSS THE CASE HERE, not behind our backs.

Mods, you can delete if inappropriate, (I guess I didn't have to tell you that  ::MonkeyWink::)


I rather discuss the case here out in the open with everyone.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #789 1/1/09 -
Post by: KYcat on January 02, 2009, 11:45:14 AM
Well, since I am on a roll , I agree with BlueMoon that CAPS is pretty much telling us to Butt out.  Evidently we don't know what we are talking about.  We are not in the know.  I guess they are at their private site discussing what everyone is talking about here.  Glad we are worthy of discussing.

Just makes me mad that we get drivebys, if you are going to discuss this case here, THEN DISCUSS THE CASE HERE, not behind our backs.

Mods, you can delete if inappropriate, (I guess I didn't have to tell you that  ::MonkeyWink::)


I rather discuss the case here out in the open with everyone.

Me, too. 


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #789 1/1/09 -
Post by: KYcat on January 02, 2009, 11:49:01 AM
Please Caps, I WANT to understand. Are you saying there were 2 different traps? Are you saying that what Tim Miller saw on the 29th was different than what was retrieved on Jan. 7th? Are you saying that evidence was found in the pond FIRST -- then moved to the cage(s)?
^^^BUMP^^^
So what do you all think he was telling us?
 
and I always thought Papiamentu was difficult...

I think Caps likes the pond idea.  It is interesting that the detective and his "vision" brother, or whatever, knew some of the basic location of the cage, before the dive.  Then the comment about decomposition (I don't agree that it starts in two hrs...especially if she was shaded or buried)...maybe he is trying to say that Natalee was taken from one place (fresh water/pond?) and placed in large cage...would still have "slime" and jean material available....but not if material had been in salt water for three years... :smt102

Who knows what he is trying to tell us?  Instead of just saying it, it's a bunch of cryptic BS.  Just say it.  And we  get slammed for questioning certain posts?  Give me a break.  How could you not be suspicious about that post?


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #789 1/1/09 -
Post by: Buckeye on January 02, 2009, 11:49:52 AM
Someone did say an Aruban diver was taking pictures.  Where exactly did the zip lock bag pictures originate?  Maybe the Arubans knew the ROV was filming.  Of course, if that was the case, why wouldn't they present the evidence and declare the case solved...Natalee kidnapped by Colombians and shoved into a post office??? ::MonkeyConfused::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #789 1/1/09 -
Post by: KYcat on January 02, 2009, 11:50:17 AM
Sorry! I know better, could someone fix my post.  I messed up the quote stack.



Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #789 1/1/09 -
Post by: Buckeye on January 02, 2009, 11:51:34 AM
Sorry! I know better, could someone fix my post.  I messed up the quote stack.



I read your reply just fine...


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #789 1/1/09 -
Post by: Anna on January 02, 2009, 11:52:39 AM
The only person whose arrest I am concerned about is Hero Brinkman, lol!  Aruba made Beth apologize for saying negative things about the manner in which they were conducting their investigation under threat to stop any investigation at all if you will recall.

They seem to think it is illegal to say Kalpoes are criminals as well, etc.  In fact, saying anything negative about Aruba seems to be just about the only crime there!

So I will wait and watch for this impending arrest but will not be holding my breath while doing so.  How many times in the past have we been told things were imminent and then absolutely nothing at all happened?  More than I can count going back to June 2005!



Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #789 1/1/09 -
Post by: Ree on January 02, 2009, 11:54:33 AM
CAPS SAID

So like a said: in colombia they call those that make information up to confuse the issues of this case a SAPO.

FROM WIKI

Sapo is the Portuguese and Spanish term for a toad.

I believe CAPS is telling us that Kermie is deliberately making things up to confuse us.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #789
Post by: bastibro on January 02, 2009, 11:54:35 AM
Isn't it tomorrow that JQK and Hero Brinkman and Greta are
to descend on Aruba?

the Dutch Members of Parliament (including Brinkman) are travelling first to Curaçao today (January 2nd).

then on to Aruba, with meetings from January 5th until January 9th.
on January 11th they travel back to The Netherlands.

Thanks, caesu.  Maybe some sparks will begin to fly in the Caribbean this coming week!

There will certainly be a lot of tension over there  ::MonkeyHaHa::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #789 1/1/09 -
Post by: San on January 02, 2009, 11:56:03 AM
The only person whose arrest I am concerned about is Hero Brinkman, lol!  Aruba made Beth apologize for saying negative things about the manner in which they were conducting their investigation under threat to stop any investigation at all if you will recall.

They seem to think it is illegal to say Kalpoes are criminals as well, etc.  In fact, saying anything negative about Aruba seems to be just about the only crime there!

So I will wait and watch for this impending arrest but will not be holding my breath while doing so.  How many times in the past have we been told things were imminent and then absolutely nothing at all happened?  More than I can count going back to June 2005!



I agree Anna.  When people shoot their mouth off they better deliver.  I don't want to hear wait unil Hero gets down there.  Those are just words.  I want to see action.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #789
Post by: Blue Moon on January 02, 2009, 11:59:21 AM
Isn't it tomorrow that JQK and Hero Brinkman and Greta are
to descend on Aruba?

the Dutch Members of Parliament (including Brinkman) are travelling first to Curaçao today (January 2nd).

then on to Aruba, with meetings from January 5th until January 9th.
on January 11th they travel back to The Netherlands.

Thanks, caesu.  Maybe some sparks will begin to fly in the Caribbean this coming week!

There will certainly be a lot of tension over there  ::MonkeyHaHa::

Do you think Hero will meet with Jan VDS?  How about Rudy?  I would love to be a fly on the wall in those meetings. ::MonkeyLaugh::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #789 1/1/09 -
Post by: Tamikosmom on January 02, 2009, 12:03:11 PM
A REMINDER

Kyle Kingman's own words tells the entire Persistence story from a first hand account.  Kyle own words reveal he suspected a John Silvetti/ALE connection ... a connection that implied a conspiracy in regards to the the contents of the cage/trap and ... at some point in time after returning to the States ... Kyle became a participant in the conspiracy.

IMO

Janet.
________

KYLE KINGMAN - PRIVATE FORUM

Kyle: I have not given anything to the FBI since the pictures and statements from Dec 29th

Kyle: None of us gave any statements to the authorities after the 29th. It's possible John Silvetti did, because he was the only one conversing with them after Jan 7th.

Kyle: I've talked with Peter Shouten numerous times back in February. He hasn't seen anything but knows about the blue fabrics. DeVries and Endemol was interested in purchasing the ROV footage and I was working between them, ABC, and CBS to strike a deal.

Kyle: In case it isn't clear.. notice the blue denim-like fabric

Kyle: The Aruban divers were on the police boat, dove from their boat, and returned to their boat.

Kyle: They were immediately whisked away by the Aruban police and not seen of again by us on the 7th

Kyle: John stood back and waited and worked with the Aruban Polis

Kyle: John definitely believed the Arubans at their every word

Kyle: John didn't want Tim Miller on board the Persistence because he said Tim wasn't necessary any more and was a liability

Kyle: John told me then he didn't want to hear me ever mention the trap again.

Kyle: Schafer is sue crazy.

Kyle: I did not feel the same and we had a major difference in opinion. He [John Silvetti] was the one who never pressed ALE to be completely open with us with the trap evidence. I would have forced them to. However, John was the one paying my invoices so I was forced to sit back and hope for the best.

Kyle: We all know it wasn't a blouse, but I believe they were sent some piece of fabric other than the fabric found inside the trap.

Kyle: I've talked with Peter Shouten numerous times back in February. He hasn't seen anything but knows about the blue fabrics. DeVries and Endemol was interested in purchasing the ROV footage and I was working between them, ABC, and CBS to strike a deal.

Kyle: Louis is currently working with someone who I do not know to put together some documentary on the case, the way it was handled, and what happened during the search. I learned this from Tim T. yesterday. Louis was sold on the idea that it will make him a lot of money.

Kyle: The portion of the discolored blue fabric was presumably on the bottom of the fabric. In my opinion this discoloration is not another type of fabric, but rather biological staining or discoloration from biological growth caused from a high organic carbon content and decay. Basically, during decay a biological mat will form around the organics from remains. This is what I believe it is on the bottom of the fabric.

Kyle: John Silvetti told me today that he may be returning to Aruba very soon for a few days.

Kyle: I couldn't get the logs from the Persistence. All things "Holloway" were stripped from the boat once it got back to Louisiana

Kyle: He's [John Silvetti] seriously making plans to open an Aruba office so he can conduct business easier in S. America and that would allow him to do that.

Kyle: It was confirmed by the FBI that they received a fabric sample send by Richardson and that it wasn't a match to Natalee's blouse. I think the video can prove or disprove whatever the FBI was sent was the same object or not. I strongly believe it's blue denim. Everyone I show thinks the same thing without being prompted (including senior ABC execs).

Klye: We're being fed misinformation to keep us searching and out of their way while they cover their asses, destroy evidence, cover their tracks, and keep us out at sea and away from the trap.

Kyle: neither Dave, Robin, or Beth has seen any of the ROV footage aside from what was broadcasted on Dateline or the pictures leaked from the FBI to Dave (and Robin H.). Beth has seen nothing in my knowledge.

Kyle: John is not a believer in the trap. He took ALE's word as gospel that it wasn't case related, yet never studied the videos or bothered to inquire further. He had plans on doing business with Aruba and in S. America and he didn't want to hurt any feelings by talks hinting at lack of complete trust and friendship.

Kyle: Notice the end of the skirt is an identical match to the 90 degree angle in the sand. I believe her left arm was outstretched with her legs slightly bent. I did not edit the legs. I believe the tarp was placed over her and tucked around her, or perhaps tied down. I believe there are several rocks laying on the sand which were placed on the tarp, or inside the tarp over her body which explains their unusual location. Either way, the proportions appear promising.

Kyle: I took the proportions of the body form from the head, to shoulder, to a 90 degree angle which I believed to be the hem line of Natalee's skirt. I then took those proportions and matched them to the photo of Natalee with what she was last seen wearing. The proportions matched within an inch from head, to shoulder, to skirt line. Based on this comparison and with what we believed we saw in the Dec 29th video, Tim Miller contacted the family and told them the 99.9% comment. I told Tim not to do anything until we have forensic results back after the site is processed. Jan 7th we sampled the contents and in my opinion we found the skirt under the sand along with the other items The blue fabric was found right where the skirt is pictured. If it isn't her, it will forever haunt me as a major cosmic WTF.

kyle: Richardson was onboard the Persistence several times and attended the meetings on the boat. You may see a glimpse of him on the Dateline video in the survey room along with Mos standing over my shoulder.

Kyle: The bags were removed just after the ROV got out of the way when the divers took the samples to their boat.... and took off

Kyle: We're close to finding the Dirty Hand and a major leak plaguing the investigation. I believe they're linked. I'm assuming Caps isn't deep inside ALE, but do we know that he isn't? We need to figure out who Cap's source is and what he does.  Can we confirm Destiny's source is a Dairio reporter? If so, do we know who this would be? Could it be Eduardo Mansur???

Kyle: THis is what I'm trying to figure out now. I need to know the leak! I believe Caps is only one step away from DirtyHand

Kyle: I need to know what we know about Caps and Destiny. I need their names if possible.

Klye:  I did not give the information to the FBI and I'm unaware of anyone relaying the possibility to them.

Klye: I havn't spoken to Beth and don't plan to personally.


KYLE KINGMAN - SCARED MONKEYS

JANUARY 26, 2008

oceanexploration
Re: Natalee Case Discussion #715 1/25 -
« Reply #103 on: January 26, 2008, 12:38:25 PM »


Thought you all may find this interesting if you're willing to accept it-

To date, the Aruban police and dive team has been a tremendous help.  They've honestly done a great job. Over the last month we've established a very good working relationship based on openness and trust.  Most of the relationship success was due to getting the media out of the way and working together shoulder to shoulder over time.  We've helped each other however and whenever we can.  They've treated us with decency and respect and we have treated them as friends and allies, which they are. Most of the police and divers are new since this case started and both eager and careful to do things right.  I wish we had a month ahead of the project just to establish the relationships and trust. I know many of you would likely doubt this view, but it's based on the experiences in the field of the entire search team. I too was extremely worried, paranoid, and suspecting in the beginning.  Now, it's clear we're all working towards a common goal.

http://scaredmonkeys.net/index.php?topic=2539.msg332457;topicseen#msg332457
 

MARCH 19, 2008

oceanexploration
Re: Natalee Case Discussion #744 3/19 -
« Reply #201 on: March 19, 2008, 08:21:47 PM »


We had little option other than to have the Aruban dive division recover the samples and bring them back under their care.  Remember we are Americans working in Aruban waters, subject to their laws, invitation, and blessing.  Our hands are tied for the most part. I personally was extremely uncomfortable with the chain of custody, being that we weren't a part of it, but I was powerless to do anything about it.   The samples were photographed in detail by one Aruban diver and the other two investigated the contents of the trap, the dimensions, the rigging, and what surrounded the trap.  From the video, it looked like they did a diligent and careful job with the samples and the underwater photography.  I don't know who has these pictures, but I must assume ALE.

http://scaredmonkeys.net/index.php?topic=2721.msg366857;topicseen#msg366857

 
BROTHER OF BETH HOLLOWAY - SCARED MONKEYS FORUM

private eye
Re: Natalee Case Discussion #746 4/4
« Reply #499 on: April 09, 2008, 12:39:50 AM »


If I understood Kyle correctly, and that would be that the Arubans retrieved and possessed all finds, not sharing anything with the crew, then that effort was a waste of time and effort. The only thing it could have accomplished was to locate additional evidence for the Arubans to destroy. I am not sure if that was the protocol out of Aruba's waters though. The effort was superb, but the game was fixed.

http://scaredmonkeys.net/index.php?topic=2769.msg372245;topicseen#msg372245


THE ROV IMAGES

Kermit
Re: Natalee Case Discussion #778 11/23/08 -
« Reply #408 on: November 24, 2008, 03:59:08 PM »


http://scaredmonkeys.net/index.php?topic=4173.msg555618#msg555618
 
 
Kermit
Re: Natalee Case Discussion #778 11/23/08 -
« Reply #410 on: November 24, 2008, 04:01:55 PM »


Photos given to the FBI sent to Dave and Robin posted on the internet are NOT the
photos posted above.  These were not given to the FBI until recently.

http://scaredmonkeys.net/index.php?topic=4173.msg555621#msg555621
 
++++++++++
 
Kyle Kingman
Senior Geophysical Project Manager at Alpine Ocean Seismic Survey Inc.
Greater New York City Area


Current
Senior Geophysical Operations Manager at Alpine Ocean Seismic Survey Inc.
 
Past
Manager at Kingman Geophysical Solutions
 
Education
Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey-New Brunswick
 
Industry
Oil & Energy


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #789 1/1/09 -
Post by: 2NJSons_Mom on January 02, 2009, 12:03:37 PM
CAPS SAID

So like a said: in colombia they call those that make information up to confuse the issues of this case a SAPO.

FROM WIKI

Sapo is the Portuguese and Spanish term for a toad.

I believe CAPS is telling us that Kermie is deliberately making things up to confuse us.

I, too, just looked up the definition.  I also found the original post where he referred to 'singing war is a lost war' (as opposed to 'sapo war is a lost war')

http://scaredmonkeys.net/index.php?topic=3363.440


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #789 1/1/09 -
Post by: Anna on January 02, 2009, 12:03:42 PM

CAPS...I've added red comments to yout post above.
Are you saying that ALE put remains in the cage without the knowledge of the persistence crew/kyle?
What would be the purpose? Why hasn't ALE presented the contents of the cage then? Blackmail to keep some quiet? I don't follow..Please explain.

Kyle Kingman held a professional position on board the Persistence and ... his own words on the Natalee's Freebirds' forum tells the truth regarding the happenings encompassing the trap/cage.  Kyle may now be distancing himselves from his posts submitted the the Natalee's Freebirds' forum but ... you know the expession ... "You can deny your belly botton but ... every time you look down it is there".

It is my opinion that CAPS has been placed on the SM forum in January by Aruban higher ups to distract from the contents of the trap/cage ... that ALE had just taken possession of ... by diverting attention to other locations where Natalee Holloway's remains.

Janet

__________

KYLE KINGMAN - PRIVATE FORUM

Kyle: THis is what I'm trying to figure out now. I need to know the leak! I believe Caps is only one step away from DirtyHand
[/color][/color]
CapsLockWizard
Re: Natalee Case Discussion #780 11/26/08 -
« Reply #931 on: December 03, 2008, 04:19:56 AM »


<snipped?

Another thing , I went to dive a week a go to the same location, and the Cage is still there. If the cage was evidance in a murder case, why is it still in the water.

Another thing, from 2005 to 2008, we has gone through several mayor stroms that has pull sunken boat more heavy than the cage and in depth more than the cage to shore.

The cage has an Owner and is not Aruban  nor Venezuelan  and not Dutch. it is from a Colombian person and the use has it purpuse.

<snipped>

CAPS

http://scaredmonkeys.net/index.php?topic=4182.msg564838;topicseen#msg564838


Janet, these two quotes really bother me.  First Caps is only one step away from DirtyHand AND caps dove down to the location the cage was.  Is Caps the brother of DirtyHand? Just thinking out loud here.



So at this point in time Kyle is saying that he believes Caps is one step away from Dirty Hand and is a leak or what?  Next thing we know Caps is meeting with John Silvetti not once but three times?

Caps, were these meetings all to discuss the pond?  I was told it was not drained by OM but just dried up.  Growth length of the grass tends to support this.  If you STILL contend it was drained, who drained it because OM knows it was NOT the fire or police and that the search at that time was not for Natalee.

How could 40 Dutch investigators arrive on such a small island with absolutely no media coverage?  I don't think they did.  Didn't happen.

JMO


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #789 1/1/09 -
Post by: Buckeye on January 02, 2009, 12:03:59 PM
CAPS SAID

So like a said: in colombia they call those that make information up to confuse the issues of this case a SAPO.

FROM WIKI

Sapo is the Portuguese and Spanish term for a toad.

I believe CAPS is telling us that Kermie is deliberately making things up to confuse us.

 ::MonkeyEek::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #789 1/1/09 -
Post by: blah on January 02, 2009, 12:04:20 PM
Johan555, can you give us any insight into what CAPS is referring to regarding an arrest this week of a major player of the game?



I call Bullshit!!!


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #789 1/1/09 -
Post by: SS on January 02, 2009, 12:05:55 PM
Well, since I am on a roll , I agree with BlueMoon that CAPS is pretty much telling us to Butt out.  Evidently we don't know what we are talking about.  We are not in the know.  I guess they are at their private site discussing what everyone is talking about here.  Glad we are worthy of discussing.
Just makes me mad that we get drivebys, if you are going to discuss this case here, THEN DISCUSS THE CASE HERE, not behind our backs.

Mods, you can delete if inappropriate, (I guess I didn't have to tell you that  ::MonkeyWink::)








KYCat - why are you doing this?  There is a lot of friction right now between people who have worked and posted together for years.  These people are friends.  A situation has occured and people's feelings and opinions are not the same right now and it's difficult.  Nobody is sitting in private sites discussing monkeys at SM anymore than monkeys at SM are discussing posters at private sites.  This whole concept has just developed a life of it's own.  I see it as very sad and upsetting.  It's like a family that is at odds with other.  I know that you are a new poster here on NAH, but I don't know if you even know most of the posters involved.  There are great people posting on SM, there are great people posting at private sites, and there are great people posting in both places.  Your comment above is no different than the drive bys you are complaining about.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #789
Post by: truthseeker2 on January 02, 2009, 12:05:55 PM
Isn't it tomorrow that JQK and Hero Brinkman and Greta are
to descend on Aruba?

the Dutch Members of Parliament (including Brinkman) are travelling first to Curaçao today (January 2nd).

then on to Aruba, with meetings from January 5th until January 9th.
on January 11th they travel back to The Netherlands.

Thanks, caesu.  Maybe some sparks will begin to fly in the Caribbean this coming week!

There will certainly be a lot of tension over there  ::MonkeyHaHa::

Do you think Hero will meet with Jan VDS?  How about Rudy?  I would love to be a fly on the wall in those meetings. ::MonkeyLaugh::

I would be surprised if Van Der Straaten is on Aruba next week.  They could meet with Rudy, though.  I hope Greta is down there for the entire time and Hero gives her all the scoop.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #789 1/1/09 -
Post by: Blue Moon on January 02, 2009, 12:09:18 PM
CAPS SAID

So like a said: in colombia they call those that make information up to confuse the issues of this case a SAPO.

FROM WIKI

Sapo is the Portuguese and Spanish term for a toad.

I believe CAPS is telling us that Kermie is deliberately making things up to confuse us.

 ::MonkeyEek::

Who isn't making things up to confuse us?  Seems that is the answer to everything that is questioned.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #789 1/1/09 -
Post by: Ree on January 02, 2009, 12:11:29 PM
CAPS SAID

So like a said: in colombia they call those that make information up to confuse the issues of this case a SAPO.

FROM WIKI

Sapo is the Portuguese and Spanish term for a toad.

I believe CAPS is telling us that Kermie is deliberately making things up to confuse us.

 ::MonkeyEek::

Who isn't making things up to confuse us?  Seems that is the answer to everything that is questioned.

Kermie's not, IMHO.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #789 1/1/09 -
Post by: 2NJSons_Mom on January 02, 2009, 12:11:41 PM
SS, KYcat actually registered a month before you did, if I'm not mistaken and fwiw. Just sayin'


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #789 1/1/09 -
Post by: klaasend on January 02, 2009, 12:12:11 PM
Why would Kermit lie?

Why would Caps lie?

That is the million dollar question.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #789 1/1/09 -
Post by: Blue Moon on January 02, 2009, 12:12:24 PM
CAPS SAID

So like a said: in colombia they call those that make information up to confuse the issues of this case a SAPO.

FROM WIKI

Sapo is the Portuguese and Spanish term for a toad.

I believe CAPS is telling us that Kermie is deliberately making things up to confuse us.

 ::MonkeyEek::

Who isn't making things up to confuse us?  Seems that is the answer to everything that is questioned.

Kermie's not, IMHO.

Oh I totally agree with you on that point.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #789 1/1/09 -
Post by: Maggie on January 02, 2009, 12:15:21 PM
I think all of this is a Catch 44 situation (a Catch 22 of a Catch 22). Anonymity brings its own blessings and curses. When you don't know who's who in the zoo, you are only left with speculation as to motives and procedures. We all love this forum, so my suggestion: let's get back to seeking answers and sharing what we know (and what we don't) and leave behind the inherent questions of anonymity.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #789 1/1/09 -
Post by: Blue Moon on January 02, 2009, 12:16:46 PM
Why would Kermit lie?

Why would Caps lie?

That is the million dollar question.

I cannot necessarily say either one is lying.  I think Kermit is being totally honest and upfront with her information from the prospective of bringing Natalee home to her family.

I think Caps is working on Aruba in a very bad situation and bringing their viewpoint from that prospective.

So I am viewing it more from Kermits point-of-view than from Caps.  Caps is working it from an Aruba viewpoint which he will try to limit the damage done to his island.  Natalee is more important than the damage being done to Aruba by Aruba, not the msm or the family or an fbi agent. 


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #789 1/1/09 -
Post by: Tamikosmom on January 02, 2009, 12:18:15 PM
CAPS SAID

So like a said: in colombia they call those that make information up to confuse the issues of this case a SAPO.

FROM WIKI

Sapo is the Portuguese and Spanish term for a toad.

I believe CAPS is telling us that Kermie is deliberately making things up to confuse us.

I, too, just looked up the definition.  I also found the original post where he referred to 'singing war is a lost war' (as opposed to 'sapo war is a lost war')

http://scaredmonkeys.net/index.php?topic=3363.440

Why does CAPS not just spit it out if he has informtion.  Some Monkeys have spent so much time and effort attempting to interpret CAPS cryptic/elusive words ... words that revered as containing the truth encompassing the Natalee Holloway case.

If CAPS has been placed on the SM Form to distract attention away from the contents of the trap/cage ... the agenda has certainly been successful.

Janet


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #789 1/1/09 -
Post by: Anna on January 02, 2009, 12:19:05 PM
Johan555, can you give us any insight into what CAPS is referring to regarding an arrest this week of a major player of the game?



I call Bullshit!!!


Hasn't everything been since what Beth and family discovered in the first 30 days?

.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #789 1/1/09 -
Post by: truthseeker2 on January 02, 2009, 12:20:02 PM
I think all of this is a Catch 44 situation (a Catch 22 of a Catch 22). Anonymity brings its own blessings and curses. When you don't know who's who in the zoo, you are only left with speculation as to motives and procedures. We all love this forum, so my suggestion: let's get back to seeking answers and sharing what we know (and what we don't) and leave behind the inherent questions of anonymity.

Very nice post.  Thanks, Maggie.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #789
Post by: blah on January 02, 2009, 12:20:16 PM
Isn't it tomorrow that JQK and Hero Brinkman and Greta are
to descend on Aruba?

the Dutch Members of Parliament (including Brinkman) are travelling first to Curaçao today (January 2nd).

then on to Aruba, with meetings from January 5th until January 9th.
on January 11th they travel back to The Netherlands.

Thanks, caesu.  Maybe some sparks will begin to fly in the Caribbean this coming week!

There will certainly be a lot of tension over there  ::MonkeyHaHa::

Do you think Hero will meet with Jan VDS?  How about Rudy?  I would love to be a fly on the wall in those meetings. ::MonkeyLaugh::


Hero is a politician running around letting his mouth write checks his ass cant cash.  Just like Barak Hussein Obama


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #789 1/1/09 -
Post by: wreck on January 02, 2009, 12:21:47 PM
Johan555, can you give us any insight into what CAPS is referring to regarding an arrest this week of a major player of the game?



I call Bullshit!!!


Hasn't everything been since what Beth and family discovered in the first 30 days?

.
Has ANYTHING Caps told us actually panned out???


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #789 1/1/09 -
Post by: Maggie on January 02, 2009, 12:23:37 PM
One answer to those who are cryptic: don't respond. Tell them to speak clearly and distinctly or their words will be disregarded. As Blue Moon of KY said, but in other terms, it is like dealing with anyone...think of children in an argument, from their own perspective and position, each of them is 100% correct.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #789
Post by: Blue Moon on January 02, 2009, 12:23:45 PM
Isn't it tomorrow that JQK and Hero Brinkman and Greta are
to descend on Aruba?

the Dutch Members of Parliament (including Brinkman) are travelling first to Curaçao today (January 2nd).

then on to Aruba, with meetings from January 5th until January 9th.
on January 11th they travel back to The Netherlands.

Thanks, caesu.  Maybe some sparks will begin to fly in the Caribbean this coming week!

There will certainly be a lot of tension over there  ::MonkeyHaHa::

Do you think Hero will meet with Jan VDS?  How about Rudy?  I would love to be a fly on the wall in those meetings. ::MonkeyLaugh::


Hero is a politician running around letting his mouth write checks his ass cant cash.  Just like Barak Hussein Obama

Then I am back to believing that this all is about politics and nothing more.  If that's the case then Hero and Jossy both have used Natalee for political purposes.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #789 1/1/09 -
Post by: Buckeye on January 02, 2009, 12:23:56 PM
There have been some very dedicated posters that were not very good with facts...or with loose imaginations..Florida/Opus comes to mind.  I believe she was dedicated but used bits of facts to advance thoughts that weren't congruent.  I see CAPS a little like that.  I could be wrong. I'm not so sure being on the island is an advantage.  People who have left the island might have a better perspective.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #789
Post by: Maggie on January 02, 2009, 12:27:55 PM
Isn't it tomorrow that JQK and Hero Brinkman and Greta are
to descend on Aruba?

the Dutch Members of Parliament (including Brinkman) are travelling first to Curaçao today (January 2nd).

then on to Aruba, with meetings from January 5th until January 9th.
on January 11th they travel back to The Netherlands.

Thanks, caesu.  Maybe some sparks will begin to fly in the Caribbean this coming week!

There will certainly be a lot of tension over there  ::MonkeyHaHa::

Do you think Hero will meet with Jan VDS?  How about Rudy?  I would love to be a fly on the wall in those meetings. ::MonkeyLaugh::


Hero is a politician running around letting his mouth write checks his ass cant cash.  Just like Barak Hussein Obama


This is just too funny on too many levels, whether one agrees with your theory or not.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #789 1/1/09 -
Post by: Keepthefaith on January 02, 2009, 12:28:03 PM
Good Morning from Monkey's.. ::MonkeyDance:: ::MonkeyDance::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #789 1/1/09 -
Post by: wreck on January 02, 2009, 12:28:20 PM
One answer to those who are cryptic: don't respond. Tell them to speak clearly and distinctly or their words will be disregarded. As Blue Moon of KY said, but in other terms, it is like dealing with anyone...think of children in an argument, from their own perspective and position, each of them is 100% correct.
AMEN! Is Caps "Shango" or "Simian"??? Both?


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #789
Post by: Tamikosmom on January 02, 2009, 12:29:12 PM

Hero is a politician running around letting his mouth write checks his ass cant cash.  Just like Barak Hussein Obama

Then I am back to believing that this all is about politics and nothing more.  If that's the case then Hero and Jossy both have used Natalee for political purposes.

 ::MonkeyWaa::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #789
Post by: Ree on January 02, 2009, 12:32:05 PM

Hero is a politician running around letting his mouth write checks his ass cant cash.  Just like Barak Hussein Obama

Then I am back to believing that this all is about politics and nothing more.  If that's the case then Hero and Jossy both have used Natalee for political purposes.

 ::MonkeyWaa::

While it's sad, it's not all bad.  Greta and others in the beginning used the case for ratings.  That kept the case alive and hopefully will benefit Natalee in the long run.  Who cares what their motives as long as we get the girl back or some measure of justice at some point?


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #789 1/1/09 -
Post by: Keepthefaith on January 02, 2009, 12:33:03 PM
I don't know if i'm right or wrong in regards to what i believe.I will say it again.I stand with the Frog!People are saying the Frog is the diversion or the confusion.Those that have said it need to back it up and then maybe people will believe what your having to say!Still to this day i've personally seen nothing to make me believe that Kermit,Wingnut,Jen,as well as what Angie are telling us is a diversion!I'll say it again.Please help me understand in layman's terms why Kermit is the diversion.TIA


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #789
Post by: Blue Moon on January 02, 2009, 12:33:28 PM

Hero is a politician running around letting his mouth write checks his ass cant cash.  Just like Barak Hussein Obama

Then I am back to believing that this all is about politics and nothing more.  If that's the case then Hero and Jossy both have used Natalee for political purposes.

 ::MonkeyWaa::

I am sorry Janet (again).  I think before I press the post button that I will see your crying avitar after I hit post. 


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #789 1/1/09 -
Post by: SS on January 02, 2009, 12:37:27 PM
SS, KYcat actually registered a month before you did, if I'm not mistaken and fwiw. Just sayin'



2NJ - it doesn't matter to me when she joined.  To my recollection, she hasn't been an active poster with many of the people she is slamming.  2NJ, this bashing has got to stop.  It's bad enough that people are so strongly divided on the Cage, Kyle, Silvetti, Caps, Kermit, and the Pond.  The personal bashing is just taking everything to a horrible level.  This isn't what SM is about.  Monkeys have always disagreed on issues and they have sometimes strongly disagreed, but the bashing of other posters is out of control.  This has been a family for three and a half years.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #789 1/1/09 -
Post by: Magnolia on January 02, 2009, 12:38:10 PM
I can see nothing that it would profit Kermit and the other
Freebirds to come here and tell all that they have put together.

By CAPS own post he is in cahoots with Silvetti.
Nathing that CAPS has told us has panned out

I think it is pretty obvious who is telling the truth.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #789 1/1/09 -
Post by: KYcat on January 02, 2009, 12:47:39 PM
Well, since I am on a roll , I agree with BlueMoon that CAPS is pretty much telling us to Butt out.  Evidently we don't know what we are talking about.  We are not in the know.  I guess they are at their private site discussing what everyone is talking about here.  Glad we are worthy of discussing.
Just makes me mad that we get drivebys, if you are going to discuss this case here, THEN DISCUSS THE CASE HERE, not behind our backs.

Mods, you can delete if inappropriate, (I guess I didn't have to tell you that  ::MonkeyWink::)








KYCat - why are you doing this?  There is a lot of friction right now between people who have worked and posted together for years.  These people are friends.  A situation has occured and people's feelings and opinions are not the same right now and it's difficult.  Nobody is sitting in private sites discussing monkeys at SM anymore than monkeys at SM are discussing posters at private sites.  This whole concept has just developed a life of it's own.  I see it as very sad and upsetting.  It's like a family that is at odds with other.  I know that you are a new poster here on NAH, but I don't know if you even know most of the posters involved.  There are great people posting on SM, there are great people posting at private sites, and there are great people posting in both places.  Your comment above is no different than the drive bys you are complaining about.

SS, I am not a new poster.  I have been here as long as some others and actually longer than some.  My post was not a drive-by.  I am still here unlike some who post and then go away before they have to answer a question.  In response to your question, Why am I doing this? I am not doing anything to anyone.  I am asking questions and posting my opinions.

It is funny that you would say that I am new.  Maybe you never noticed me before.  Is that because I am not in the know and what I have to contribute isn't worthy.  You say many people here are friends, sorry, I wouldn't know about that.   I thought this was a board where we could discuss, voice our opinions, and ask questions. 

I had every right to state my opinion.  You do not have to agree.  I stand by my post.  If you are going to come here and post, expect questions.  Please have the decency to answer them.

 


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #789 1/1/09 -
Post by: Tamikosmom on January 02, 2009, 12:51:16 PM
Something akin to Beth Holloway's brother ... I gave Kyle the benefit of the doubt that "in the beginning" he was naive regarding the dynamics encompassing the Aruban coverup that was denying Natalee Holloway justice but ... his own words posted on the Natalee's Freebirds' forum reveals that it did not take long for him to catch on that something regarding the John S/ALE connection was not right.

I no longer give Kyle the benefit of the doubt.  That ceased when he did not share his concerns/ suspicions with the FBI/family when he returned to the States.  Instead ... he posted regarding the happenings on board the Persistence on a private site and ... he attempted to make deals with major networks.

In other words ... Kyle became one with those who were assisting the ALE in the finale' to the great Aruban coverup .

Janet

++++++



private eye (Beth Holloway's Brother)
Re: Natalee Case Discussion #742 3/10 -
« Reply #690 on: March 13, 2008, 06:56:18 PM »


I don't believe that Kyle or anyone else is allowed to review the case documents, according to the policy of the prosecutors office. I thought the beauty of the Persistence is that they were to do a true grid seach mission which depends not on psychics or even tips from the authorities, and as such their work would be independent of the investigation. They were there simply to attempt to search a predefined area for Natalee's remains. So I am not sure why they have been lured into defending the work of the Aruban authorities or a discussion of the validity of the investigation as they are not knowledgeable as to the investigation, other than what they have been told by these Arubans. There are an awful lot of highly educated people who have been chumped by people of far less formal education. A well trained police force is not thwarted by a grieving mother and the media.

And Kyle, I by no means am being disrespectful, I think you are brilliant, sincerely. But I don't think your education or work experience has prepared you for a cover up by these types of people. And I think you may be severely underestimating the education, experience, and wisdom of the monkeys and other coverup believers. Don't let them make a fool of you. We need you.

http://scaredmonkeys.net/index.php?topic=2689.msg364756#msg364756


private eye (Beth Holloway's Brother)
Re: Natalee Case Discussion #742 3/10 -
« Reply #758 on: March 14, 2008, 12:56:35 AM »


I forgot to add that I loved the message from Kyle that it is a requirement to maintain hope. I would give anything to have to eat a great big plate of crow with Kyle watching me choke on it, meaning that the Arubans are sincerely his partner. And I want him to come to his own conclusion. But I really like him, he has definitely proven his worth, and for some dumb reason I feel like he needs my protection, which is a joke. Just keep your guard up Kyle is all I am saying. There have been some very strange happenings in this case.

http://scaredmonkeys.net/index.php?topic=2689.msg364756#msg364756


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #789 1/1/09 -
Post by: KYcat on January 02, 2009, 12:52:40 PM
SS, KYcat actually registered a month before you did, if I'm not mistaken and fwiw. Just sayin'



2NJ - it doesn't matter to me when she joined.  To my recollection, she hasn't been an active poster with many of the people she is slamming.  2NJ, this bashing has got to stop.  It's bad enough that people are so strongly divided on the Cage, Kyle, Silvetti, Caps, Kermit, and the Pond.  The personal bashing is just taking everything to a horrible level.  This isn't what SM is about.  Monkeys have always disagreed on issues and they have sometimes strongly disagreed, but the bashing of other posters is out of control.  This has been a family for three and a half years.

Whoa SS back up.  2NJ merely stated a fact.  Maybe you should check your recollection because, as a matter of fact, I have been here posting with "these" people.  ANd let me clarify, I am not slamming.  I want people to stick around long enough to answer questions regarding their posts. If they think I am bashing them, let them tell me so.

 


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #789 1/1/09 -
Post by: Keepthefaith on January 02, 2009, 12:56:06 PM
From Seattle to the blue Moons of Kentucky..Hope your feelin Fantastic after the New Year... ::MonkeyLaugh::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #789 1/1/09 -
Post by: KYcat on January 02, 2009, 12:57:41 PM
From Seattle to the blue Moons of Kentucky..Hope your feelin Fantastic after the New Year... ::MonkeyLaugh::

Same to you!  I'm feeling pretty Frisky!


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #789 1/1/09 -
Post by: SS on January 02, 2009, 01:00:18 PM
Well, since I am on a roll , I agree with BlueMoon that CAPS is pretty much telling us to Butt out.  Evidently we don't know what we are talking about.  We are not in the know.  I guess they are at their private site discussing what everyone is talking about here.  Glad we are worthy of discussing.
Just makes me mad that we get drivebys, if you are going to discuss this case here, THEN DISCUSS THE CASE HERE, not behind our backs.

Mods, you can delete if inappropriate, (I guess I didn't have to tell you that  ::MonkeyWink::)








KYCat - why are you doing this?  There is a lot of friction right now between people who have worked and posted together for years.  These people are friends.  A situation has occured and people's feelings and opinions are not the same right now and it's difficult.  Nobody is sitting in private sites discussing monkeys at SM anymore than monkeys at SM are discussing posters at private sites.  This whole concept has just developed a life of it's own.  I see it as very sad and upsetting.  It's like a family that is at odds with other.  I know that you are a new poster here on NAH, but I don't know if you even know most of the posters involved.  There are great people posting on SM, there are great people posting at private sites, and there are great people posting in both places.  Your comment above is no different than the drive bys you are complaining about.

SS, I am not a new poster.  I have been here as long as some others and actually longer than some.  My post was not a drive-by.  I am still here unlike some who post and then go away before they have to answer a question.  In response to your question, Why am I doing this? I am not doing anything to anyone.  I am asking questions and posting my opinions.

It is funny that you would say that I am new.  Maybe you never noticed me before.  Is that because I am not in the know and what I have to contribute isn't worthy.  You say many people here are friends, sorry, I wouldn't know about that.   I thought this was a board where we could discuss, voice our opinions, and ask questions. 

I had every right to state my opinion.  You do not have to agree.  I stand by my post.  If you are going to come here and post, expect questions.  Please have the decency to answer them.

 



Evidently we don't know what we are talking about.  We are not in the know.  I guess they are at their private site discussing what everyone is talking about here.  Glad we are worthy of discussing.

That is not a question and it's not even an opinion on something being discussed.  It's sarcastic and it's nasty.  If you aren't aware that there are deep friendships in this forum, then I would be honored to tell that there are.  This is a very difficult period of time for everyone at both SM and Freebirds.  People who have stood tigether for years are now standing on opposite sides of a fence.  Please don't make this any more difficult than it already is.  The fire doesn't need fuel in the form of sarcastic comments. 


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #789 1/1/09 -
Post by: KYcat on January 02, 2009, 01:00:31 PM
Johan555, can you give us any insight into what CAPS is referring to regarding an arrest this week of a major player of the game?



Johann, you are back.  Can you help us out?



Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #789 1/1/09 -
Post by: johan555 on January 02, 2009, 01:00:52 PM
Well, Johan and CAPS both left.  You know, I am tired of every time I ask a question to certain people they leave.  Maybe he left before I posted, I don't know.  But I had this same problem with OE before.

Just sayin..........



left ?
i am having dinner now !  ::MonkeyHaHa::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #789 1/1/09 -
Post by: Kermit on January 02, 2009, 01:01:00 PM
MumInOhio

I would appreciate it if you would go back to your little group and get your facts straight.

It was NOT ME who first posted the photo of the CMB bank next to Digicel.

The reason I know this is because I posted that photo at FREEBIRDS!

IT WAS DAYHIKER who took the photo from Freebirds and posted it here at SM[/b]

In addition:
If you are confused by truth, then you need to sit down and have it out with your group.
BECAUSE if you HAD, you would have known that it was me that was asked to BY THOSE
SPECIFIC members of your group to FIND OUT INFORMATION ON CAPS!

I do not recall posting Montanja 10.
If I did, please give me the link to my post.

I do recall posting Catrini 7.
Lalasmom, your group member not only continued to query me about it, but also emailed me asking me
why I posted it because it was near where CAPS lived! Which differed from the address that CAPS gave
to DAVE and the FBI!

Want me to post the email? I will be more then happy to do so.


Call it drive-bys or untruth or whatever word you want to come up with.

I DID THAT - FOR THEM

If you think for one minute that I can not back up and show the emails to prove what I am saying
 IS THE TRUTH - you are sorely mistaken.

Call me whatever names, insinuate whatever you want, but I have the proof.

Now, go find yourself someone else to slander.


Do not bother responding to me.
Do not bother apologizing to me.
You are forgiven.
But I won't respond to you ever again.





Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #789 1/1/09 -
Post by: Tamikosmom on January 02, 2009, 01:01:43 PM
I can see nothing that it would profit Kermit and the other
Freebirds to come here and tell all that they have put together.

By CAPS own post he is in cahoots with Silvetti.
Nathing that CAPS has told us has panned out

I think it is pretty obvious who is telling the truth.

... and by Kyle's own words there is a John Silvetti/Aruban connection that implies justice for Natalee Holloway and closure for her family was never the objective of the Persistence undertaking.

Janet
_____

KYLE KINGMAN - PRIVATE FORUM

JOHN SILVETTI

Kyle: None of us gave any statements to the authorities after the 29th. It's possible John Silvetti did, because he was the only one conversing with them after Jan 7th.

Kyle: The Aruban divers were on the police boat, dove from their boat, and returned to their boat.

Kyle: They were immediately whisked away by the Aruban police and not seen of again by us on the 7th

Kyle: John stood back and waited and worked with the Aruban Polis

Kyle: John definitely believed the Arubans at their every word

Kyle: John didn't want Tim Miller on board the Persistence because he said Tim wasn't necessary any more and was a liability

Kyle: John told me then he didn't want to hear me ever mention the trap again.

Kyle: I did not feel the same and we had a major difference in opinion. He [John Silvetti] was the one who never pressed ALE to be completely open with us with the trap evidence. I would have forced them to. However, John was the one paying my invoices so I was forced to sit back and hope for the best.

Kyle: John Silvetti told me today that he may be returning to Aruba very soon for a few days.

Kyle: I couldn't get the logs from the Persistence. All things "Holloway" were stripped from the boat once it got back to Louisiana

Klye: We're being fed misinformation to keep us searching and out of their way while they cover their asses, destroy evidence, cover their tracks, and keep us out at sea and away from the trap.

Kyle: John is not a believer in the trap. He took ALE's word as gospel that it wasn't case related, yet never studied the videos or bothered to inquire further. He had plans on doing business with Aruba and in S. America and he didn't want to hurt any feelings by talks hinting at lack of complete trust and friendship.

kyle: Richardson was onboard the Persistence several times and attended the meetings on the boat. You may see a glimpse of him on the Dateline video in the survey room along with Mos standing over my shoulder.

Kyle: The bags were removed just after the ROV got out of the way when the divers took the samples to their boat.... and took off


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #789 1/1/09 -
Post by: Keepthefaith on January 02, 2009, 01:01:57 PM
For me.Scared Monkey's is a wonderful site because it allows people with very little knowledge to ask questions as they see fit without ridicule as to why!We should be able to discuss whatever,whenever as long as it is about JUSTICE FOR NATALEE..


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #789 1/1/09 -
Post by: johan555 on January 02, 2009, 01:02:16 PM
Johan555, can you give us any insight into what CAPS is referring to regarding an arrest this week of a major player of the game?



Johann, you are back.  Can you help us out?



an arrest ? i have no idea KYcat  !



Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #789 1/1/09 -
Post by: KYcat on January 02, 2009, 01:04:52 PM
Well, since I am on a roll , I agree with BlueMoon that CAPS is pretty much telling us to Butt out.  Evidently we don't know what we are talking about.  We are not in the know.  I guess they are at their private site discussing what everyone is talking about here.  Glad we are worthy of discussing.
Just makes me mad that we get drivebys, if you are going to discuss this case here, THEN DISCUSS THE CASE HERE, not behind our backs.

Mods, you can delete if inappropriate, (I guess I didn't have to tell you that  ::MonkeyWink::)








KYCat - why are you doing this?  There is a lot of friction right now between people who have worked and posted together for years.  These people are friends.  A situation has occured and people's feelings and opinions are not the same right now and it's difficult.  Nobody is sitting in private sites discussing monkeys at SM anymore than monkeys at SM are discussing posters at private sites.  This whole concept has just developed a life of it's own.  I see it as very sad and upsetting.  It's like a family that is at odds with other.  I know that you are a new poster here on NAH, but I don't know if you even know most of the posters involved.  There are great people posting on SM, there are great people posting at private sites, and there are great people posting in both places.  Your comment above is no different than the drive bys you are complaining about.

SS, I am not a new poster.  I have been here as long as some others and actually longer than some.  My post was not a drive-by.  I am still here unlike some who post and then go away before they have to answer a question.  In response to your question, Why am I doing this? I am not doing anything to anyone.  I am asking questions and posting my opinions.

It is funny that you would say that I am new.  Maybe you never noticed me before.  Is that because I am not in the know and what I have to contribute isn't worthy.  You say many people here are friends, sorry, I wouldn't know about that.   I thought this was a board where we could discuss, voice our opinions, and ask questions. 

I had every right to state my opinion.  You do not have to agree.  I stand by my post.  If you are going to come here and post, expect questions.  Please have the decency to answer them.

 



Evidently we don't know what we are talking about.  We are not in the know.  I guess they are at their private site discussing what everyone is talking about here.  Glad we are worthy of discussing.

That is not a question and it's not even an opinion on something being discussed.  It's sarcastic and it's nasty.  If you aren't aware that there are deep friendships in this forum, then I would be honored to tell that there are.  This is a very difficult period of time for everyone at both SM and Freebirds.  People who have stood tigether for years are now standing on opposite sides of a fence.  Please don't make this any more difficult than it already is.  The fire doesn't need fuel in the form of sarcastic comments. 

Yes, SS, it is an opinion.  I have been here a long time also.  The people you are referring to made friends here.  I'm glad.  For the rest of us, that weren't previledged enough to make friends, we will just keeping having opinions and asking questions. 

Don't accuse me of being sarcastic and nasty.  It was MY observation.  Frustration?  Yes, I am frustrated.  It is okay to be on different sides of the fence regarding how you feel about this case. 


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #789 1/1/09 -
Post by: Blue Moon on January 02, 2009, 01:05:05 PM
From Seattle to the blue Moons of Kentucky..Hope your feelin Fantastic after the New Year... ::MonkeyLaugh::

Same to you!  I'm feeling pretty Frisky!

Blue Moon of KY is NOT looking forward to going back to work next week.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #789 1/1/09 -
Post by: KYcat on January 02, 2009, 01:07:35 PM
Johan555, can you give us any insight into what CAPS is referring to regarding an arrest this week of a major player of the game?



Johann, you are back.  Can you help us out?



an arrest ? i have no idea KYcat  !



Thanks for answering!  Just wondering how this person is associated with the Natalee Holloway case.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #789 1/1/09 -
Post by: Keepthefaith on January 02, 2009, 01:07:44 PM
Johan555, can you give us any insight into what CAPS is referring to regarding an arrest this week of a major player of the game?



Johann, you are back.  Can you help us out?



an arrest ? i have no idea KYcat  !



I believe Caps said one of the major players was going to be arrested this week johan!Monkey's please correct me if i'm wrong..


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #789 1/1/09 -
Post by: texasmom on January 02, 2009, 01:08:14 PM
From Seattle to the blue Moons of Kentucky..Hope your feelin Fantastic after the New Year... ::MonkeyLaugh::

Same to you!  I'm feeling pretty Frisky!

Blue Moon of KY is NOT looking forward to going back to work next week.

texasmom is NOT either.   ::MonkeyWaa::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #789 1/1/09 -
Post by: Kermit on January 02, 2009, 01:08:18 PM
Why would Kermit lie?

Why would Caps lie?

That is the million dollar question.

I can double-dog guarantee you, I can provide proof of everything I have posted


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #789 1/1/09 -
Post by: San on January 02, 2009, 01:08:30 PM
I think all of this is a Catch 44 situation (a Catch 22 of a Catch 22). Anonymity brings its own blessings and curses. When you don't know who's who in the zoo, you are only left with speculation as to motives and procedures. We all love this forum, so my suggestion: let's get back to seeking answers and sharing what we know (and what we don't) and leave behind the inherent questions of anonymity.

I agee but it was the sharing of information that brought this all on.  People didn't want us to believe what was shared.  Whether it is Kermit or CAPS.  This is like a tug of war.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #789 1/1/09 -
Post by: Ree on January 02, 2009, 01:09:33 PM
From Seattle to the blue Moons of Kentucky..Hope your feelin Fantastic after the New Year... ::MonkeyLaugh::

Same to you!  I'm feeling pretty Frisky!

Blue Moon of KY is NOT looking forward to going back to work next week.

texasmom is NOT either.   ::MonkeyWaa::

Ree is at at work, but not working!!!! 


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #789 1/1/09 -
Post by: Keepthefaith on January 02, 2009, 01:12:07 PM
Why would Kermit lie?

Why would Caps lie?

That is the million dollar question.

I can double-dog guarantee you, I can provide proof of everything I have posted


For what it's worth i'm still standing with the Frog.If your ever up in Seattle there are some wonderful turtles that hang out on the logs on Greenlake.Stop by and say hello.It's a neat sight to say the least.All the turtle's basking on the logs and diving under the lily pads.This is true Kermit!It's relaxing in the summer time on Greenlake.... ::MonkeyDance::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #789 1/1/09 -
Post by: KYcat on January 02, 2009, 01:12:20 PM
From Seattle to the blue Moons of Kentucky..Hope your feelin Fantastic after the New Year... ::MonkeyLaugh::

Same to you!  I'm feeling pretty Frisky!

Blue Moon of KY is NOT looking forward to going back to work next week.

texasmom is NOT either.   ::MonkeyWaa::

Ree is at at work, but not working!!!! 

Ree   

 ::MonkeyLaugh::

I hate the thought of going back to work next week, also.  I have got to get some work done around here today -  my hubby wants to know what I do all day!!!   LOL



Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #789 1/1/09 -
Post by: Patriot on January 02, 2009, 01:12:44 PM
From Gretawire

Change of Plans ….
by Greta Van Susteren
You know this news business…..we never know where we are going to take you and when….and now we, at ON THE RECORD at 10pm, have a change in plans.  We are not taking you on your adventure on Sunday that we had planned for you….at least not the journey to the China, South Korea, Japan, Turkey etc trip we had planned to take you via GretaWire, ON THE RECORD at 10pm etc. (and yes, we were doing these countries and more in less than 5 days)…..I will keep you posted what our plan is now…..


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #789 1/1/09 -
Post by: texasmom on January 02, 2009, 01:13:14 PM
From Seattle to the blue Moons of Kentucky..Hope your feelin Fantastic after the New Year... ::MonkeyLaugh::

Same to you!  I'm feeling pretty Frisky!

Blue Moon of KY is NOT looking forward to going back to work next week.

texasmom is NOT either.   ::MonkeyWaa::



Ree is at at work, but not working!!!! 

 ::MonkeyShocked::  ::MonkeyWink::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #789 1/1/09 -
Post by: Anna on January 02, 2009, 01:13:39 PM
I try VERY hard not to ever tell a poster what to post or what to think.  If I strongly disagree and know their email, I will privately email them to discuss or if they have stated known factual information incorrectly and let them correct it.  Not me.

People can't help what they think or how they feel.  Only what they post.  I was always told it was abusive to tell people not to have their true feelings about things. 

Many things posted here do not add up and defy logic.   I do resent when posts are made that are highly insulting to ones basic intelligence.  We are not stupid as some might think.  Perhaps they believe anti-American propaganda in this regard rather than the truth.

There are some highly intelligent people who post in this forum and they are not nearly as easy to fool as it might appear.


.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #789 1/1/09 -
Post by: Blue Moon on January 02, 2009, 01:14:57 PM
From Seattle to the blue Moons of Kentucky..Hope your feelin Fantastic after the New Year... ::MonkeyLaugh::

Same to you!  I'm feeling pretty Frisky!

Blue Moon of KY is NOT looking forward to going back to work next week.

texasmom is NOT either.   ::MonkeyWaa::



Ree is at at work, but not working!!!! 

 ::MonkeyShocked::  ::MonkeyWink::

Ree shame on you.   ::MonkeyLaugh::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #789 1/1/09 -
Post by: Anna on January 02, 2009, 01:16:51 PM
From Gretawire

Change of Plans ….
by Greta Van Susteren
You know this news business…..we never know where we are going to take you and when….and now we, at ON THE RECORD at 10pm, have a change in plans.  We are not taking you on your adventure on Sunday that we had planned for you….at least not the journey to the China, South Korea, Japan, Turkey etc trip we had planned to take you via GretaWire, ON THE RECORD at 10pm etc. (and yes, we were doing these countries and more in less than 5 days)…..I will keep you posted what our plan is now…..




Oh, I do hope this means Greta is going to Aruba!


.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #789 1/1/09 -
Post by: Tamikosmom on January 02, 2009, 01:17:47 PM
It would appear that Aruba neglects to question witnesses who statements would not conform with the coverup agenda.

Janet
______
 
KYLE KINGMAN - PRIVATE FORUM

Kyle:
None of us gave any statements to the authorities after the 29th. It's possible John Silvetti did, because he was the only one conversing with them after Jan 7th.


'Scarborough Country' for August 11
updated 6:33 a.m. PT, Fri., Aug. 12, 2005


JUG TWITTY, STEPFATHER OF NATALEE HOLLOWAY:  ... Those people that were with me that night, had they taken our statements at least a week after it happened, we would have already had the answer. But when they take my statement 33 days later, and they take the other guys‘ statements that were with me and ladies that were with me, you know, like 19 days later, it‘s like they didn‘t want to find the truth.

http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/8925176/


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #789 1/1/09 -
Post by: Anna on January 02, 2009, 01:17:58 PM
I did not know that Hero Brinkman was G. Wilders' nephew.

Interesting.

I do wish him every success and safety during his trip.

.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #789 1/1/09 -
Post by: KYcat on January 02, 2009, 01:18:18 PM
I try VERY hard not to ever tell a poster what to post or what to think.  If I strongly disagree and know their email, I will privately email them to discuss or if they have stated known factual information incorrectly and let them correct it.  Not me.

People can't help what they think or how they feel.  Only what they post.  I was always told it was abusive to tell people not to have their true feelings about things. 

Many things posted here do not add up and defy logic.   I do resent when posts are made that are highly insulting to ones basic intelligence.  We are not stupid as some might think.  Perhaps they believe anti-American propaganda in this regard rather than the truth.

There are some highly intelligent people who post in this forum and they are not nearly as easy to fool as it might appear.


.

Anna that's what I said!!!   LOL  I agree - and you said it so eloquently.

Thanks!


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #789 1/1/09 -
Post by: Anna on January 02, 2009, 01:19:52 PM


.

Does anyone know where the statement that Jug knew the Persistence was primarily about oil and secondarily about Natalee came from?

Who originally said that and where? 

That is bothering me greatly for some reason or other.

.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #789 1/1/09 -
Post by: Blue Moon on January 02, 2009, 01:21:46 PM
I try VERY hard not to ever tell a poster what to post or what to think.  If I strongly disagree and know their email, I will privately email them to discuss or if they have stated known factual information incorrectly and let them correct it.  Not me.

People can't help what they think or how they feel.  Only what they post.  I was always told it was abusive to tell people not to have their true feelings about things. 

Many things posted here do not add up and defy logic.   I do resent when posts are made that are highly insulting to ones basic intelligence.  We are not stupid as some might think.  Perhaps they believe anti-American propaganda in this regard rather than the truth.

There are some highly intelligent people who post in this forum and they are not nearly as easy to fool as it might appear.


.

I agree Anna.  I have posted here not as long as most people but I have read here since the beginning.  Today I feel more and more like I have come between family members and intruded where I am not wanted.  I try to keep on posting and ignore the distractions but lately it is getting more and more hard to do.  Believe me I know how a family fight can get ugly (I come from a family of 11) so I try to avoid bad situations.  Just because I have not posted as much as others doesn't mean I don't know what is going on. 
JUSTICE FOR NATALEE and BRING HER HOME NOW.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #789 1/1/09 -
Post by: Blue Moon on January 02, 2009, 01:24:13 PM


.

Does anyone know where the statement that Jug knew the Persistence was primarily about oil and secondarily about Natalee came from?

Who originally said that and where? 

That is bothering me greatly for some reason or other.

.

It is in the last thread on the 31st (I know because I was up until 1:00 catching up).


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #789 1/1/09 -
Post by: Keepthefaith on January 02, 2009, 01:24:27 PM
I try VERY hard not to ever tell a poster what to post or what to think.  If I strongly disagree and know their email, I will privately email them to discuss or if they have stated known factual information incorrectly and let them correct it.  Not me.

People can't help what they think or how they feel.  Only what they post.  I was always told it was abusive to tell people not to have their true feelings about things. 

Many things posted here do not add up and defy logic.   I do resent when posts are made that are highly insulting to ones basic intelligence.  We are not stupid as some might think.  Perhaps they believe anti-American propaganda in this regard rather than the truth.

There are some highly intelligent people who post in this forum and they are not nearly as easy to fool as it might appear.


.

I agree Anna.  I have posted here not as long as most people but I have read here since the beginning.  Today I feel more and more like I have come between family members and intruded where I am not wanted.  I try to keep on posting and ignore the distractions but lately it is getting more and more hard to do.  Believe me I know how a family fight can get ugly (I come from a family of 11) so I try to avoid bad situations.  Just because I have not posted as much as others doesn't mean I don't know what is going on. 
JUSTICE FOR NATALEE and BRING HER HOME NOW.

I saw the dedication on New years night.BM of Kentucky read along marathon! ::MonkeyLaugh:: ::MonkeyLaugh:: The tenacity of the Blue Moon!


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #789 1/1/09 -
Post by: Tamikosmom on January 02, 2009, 01:24:55 PM
Why would Kermit lie?

Why would Caps lie?

That is the million dollar question.

No reason.  Lies are created to distract from the truth.  Kermit does not have an Aruban coverup agenda ... it has always been about justice for Natalee Hollloway ... it has always been about closure for her family.

A measure of closure for the family dictates that pressure needs to be put on the "powers that be" in Aruba to expose the contents of that cage/trap.  This is Kermits agenda.

Janet


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #789 1/1/09 -
Post by: johan555 on January 02, 2009, 01:27:52 PM
Johan555, can you give us any insight into what CAPS is referring to regarding an arrest this week of a major player of the game?



Johann, you are back.  Can you help us out?



an arrest ? i have no idea KYcat  !



I believe Caps said one of the major players was going to be arrested this week johan!Monkey's please correct me if i'm wrong..

that must be Paul or Joran !


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #789 1/1/09 -
Post by: SS on January 02, 2009, 01:27:58 PM
Well, since I am on a roll , I agree with BlueMoon that CAPS is pretty much telling us to Butt out.  Evidently we don't know what we are talking about.  We are not in the know.  I guess they are at their private site discussing what everyone is talking about here.  Glad we are worthy of discussing.
Just makes me mad that we get drivebys, if you are going to discuss this case here, THEN DISCUSS THE CASE HERE, not behind our backs.

Mods, you can delete if inappropriate, (I guess I didn't have to tell you that  ::MonkeyWink::)








KYCat - why are you doing this?  There is a lot of friction right now between people who have worked and posted together for years.  These people are friends.  A situation has occured and people's feelings and opinions are not the same right now and it's difficult.  Nobody is sitting in private sites discussing monkeys at SM anymore than monkeys at SM are discussing posters at private sites.  This whole concept has just developed a life of it's own.  I see it as very sad and upsetting.  It's like a family that is at odds with other.  I know that you are a new poster here on NAH, but I don't know if you even know most of the posters involved.  There are great people posting on SM, there are great people posting at private sites, and there are great people posting in both places.  Your comment above is no different than the drive bys you are complaining about.

SS, I am not a new poster.  I have been here as long as some others and actually longer than some.  My post was not a drive-by.  I am still here unlike some who post and then go away before they have to answer a question.  In response to your question, Why am I doing this? I am not doing anything to anyone.  I am asking questions and posting my opinions.

It is funny that you would say that I am new.  Maybe you never noticed me before.  Is that because I am not in the know and what I have to contribute isn't worthy.  You say many people here are friends, sorry, I wouldn't know about that.   I thought this was a board where we could discuss, voice our opinions, and ask questions. 

I had every right to state my opinion.  You do not have to agree.  I stand by my post.  If you are going to come here and post, expect questions.  Please have the decency to answer them.

 



Evidently we don't know what we are talking about.  We are not in the know.  I guess they are at their private site discussing what everyone is talking about here.  Glad we are worthy of discussing.

That is not a question and it's not even an opinion on something being discussed.  It's sarcastic and it's nasty.  If you aren't aware that there are deep friendships in this forum, then I would be honored to tell that there are.  This is a very difficult period of time for everyone at both SM and Freebirds.  People who have stood tigether for years are now standing on opposite sides of a fence.  Please don't make this any more difficult than it already is.  The fire doesn't need fuel in the form of sarcastic comments. 

Yes, SS, it is an opinion.  I have been here a long time also.  The people you are referring to made friends here.  I'm glad.  For the rest of us, that weren't previledged enough to make friends, we will just keeping having opinions and asking questions. 

Don't accuse me of being sarcastic and nasty.  It was MY observation.  Frustration?  Yes, I am frustrated.  It is okay to be on different sides of the fence regarding how you feel about this case. 



KYCat - I was making a sincere appeal to you.  This is nasty...

Evidently we don't know what we are talking about.  We are not in the know.  I guess they are at their private site discussing what everyone is talking about here.  Glad we are worthy of discussing.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #789 1/1/09 -
Post by: johan555 on January 02, 2009, 01:29:33 PM
Johan555, can you give us any insight into what CAPS is referring to regarding an arrest this week of a major player of the game?



Johann, you are back.  Can you help us out?



an arrest ? i have no idea KYcat  !



I believe Caps said one of the major players was going to be arrested this week johan!Monkey's please correct me if i'm wrong..

that must be Paul or Joran !

or ............... RG


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #789 1/1/09 -
Post by: Blue Moon on January 02, 2009, 01:31:01 PM
Anna here is what I responded to concerning this:
---------------------------------------------------------

Quote from: SunnyinTX on December 31, 2008, 07:07:15 PM
Quote from: jen3560 on December 31, 2008, 05:40:19 PM
Quote from: Magnolia on December 31, 2008, 05:34:29 PM
I just don't understand why people like Mum and Lalas & idstlou and
all of the former posters here are so angry.
Anybody who reads all of this information should see the
truth to it.  They are nitpicking at the least little word.

Why are they so mad about it all?

I'll one up you with a question here.........

why are some at that site saying that JUG knew the MAIN goal of the Persistence for that trip was oil related?

 

O.K. I am caught up.  The above, has anyone answered this?  First I read about Dave and MIP6 and now this on Jug knowing this was oil related?  I guess I can go to bed now-I welcomed the New Year catching up and I DID IT but now I have the BIGGEST headache of my laugh.  Good night all.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #789 1/1/09 -
Post by: Blue Moon on January 02, 2009, 01:32:37 PM
Anna here is what I responded to concerning this:
---------------------------------------------------------

Quote from: SunnyinTX on December 31, 2008, 07:07:15 PM
Quote from: jen3560 on December 31, 2008, 05:40:19 PM
Quote from: Magnolia on December 31, 2008, 05:34:29 PM
I just don't understand why people like Mum and Lalas & idstlou and
all of the former posters here are so angry.
Anybody who reads all of this information should see the
truth to it.  They are nitpicking at the least little word.

Why are they so mad about it all?

I'll one up you with a question here.........

why are some at that site saying that JUG knew the MAIN goal of the Persistence for that trip was oil related?

 

O.K. I am caught up.  The above, has anyone answered this?  First I read about Dave and MIP6 and now this on Jug knowing this was oil related?  I guess I can go to bed now-I welcomed the New Year catching up and I DID IT but now I have the BIGGEST headache of my laugh.  Good night all.

That quote was from Jen.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #789 1/1/09 -
Post by: Anna on January 02, 2009, 01:32:48 PM
I don't think Joran is in Aruba from the photos.  Somewhere in the Orient.

And don't think vd Straten is either so guess we can eliminate those two from the arrest?

I still think Brinkman the most likely target for while corruption is NOT illegal in Aruba--they have even bragged about that--apparently discussing it will get you in hot water every time as it did Beth Holloway.



Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #789
Post by: billb's daughter on January 02, 2009, 01:33:01 PM
Does anyone have an idea at what point in the ocean search that the detective and his brother met with the Persistence crew?  I'm curious as to if it was before the search began...or at what point?

Kyle said: "Just before Christmas they are contacted by a detective and his brother who gave them information that turned out to be the correct latitude While we were searching shortly before Christmas, we were contacted by an Aruban detective who was involved in the Holloway case. He claimed that his brother had a vision about Natalee¢s body offshore and had coordinates. He and his brother agreed to meet on the Persistence. The detective¢s brother gave what he thought were coordinates, but turned out to be a line of latitude. This latitude aligned with Arashi beach and came within a half mile of the fish trap.


So, they were contacted around the time Caps started posting here.

And didn't Caps say that he himself dove down to the cage (meaning he knew exactly what the latitude/longitude of the cage was)?  The cage was still there, why didn't divers take the cage?  Also, caps says Salvetti said nothing in the cage except plastic-then WHY did they make a dive and retrieve all that "plastic" and then test something within the cage?

Some good questions Blue Moon.....
The more I read the last few days I have come to the following thoughts...
1. The persistence mission did not live up to its advertised  objective.
2. Tim Miller was conned....than removed when he became a 'liability'
3. Kyle questioned the persistence objective after the fact...was given time to do the right thing....but did not
4. John S & Kyle & Caps are somehow intertwined......mhoo..doesn't bode well with the timing of this relationship....best guess...at least a diversion from the cage contents...
5. Idstlou, hotspot and a few others have muddied the posts of the last few days trying to defend john s., kyle, Caps....intentional to throw off the questioning surrounding the contents of the cage? I don't know...but suspect that is part of their agenda.....(are their intentions towards Justice for Natalee good and they are only mislead? I'd like to think so....I respected their posts in the past...but it is still annoying at this time- sorry mum).
6. Kermit has brought the issue with persistence/kyle to SM ( I stand with the frog -green legs and all) and many freebirds left to support Kermit on SM....
The point now is to put all the pressure possible on those in authority (state department - fbi - media/Greta/Peter DVs - dutch - aruba, whomever we have routes to) to expose what the contents of the cage are.....we have pictures...kyle's own words that aruba took cage contents...we need to push this agenda...What was in the cage that aruba divers recovered?
mhoo...billb
 
bump


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #789 1/1/09 -
Post by: KYcat on January 02, 2009, 01:34:23 PM
SS This is the last time I am responding to this. 

snipped>>>>


KYCat - I was making a sincere appeal to you.  This is nasty...

Evidently we don't know what we are talking about.  We are not in the know.  I guess they are at their private site discussing what everyone is talking about here.  Glad we are worthy of discussing.

snipped>>>

I was making an observation based on things I have read here and seen here.  It was purely my opinion.  I am frustrated.

Now, if you want to get nasty.................  please go back and read some of your "friends" previous posts.  There was some very nasty stuff being slung around.  Did you call them out? 

That's it.  Please do not post about my comment again.  I think we need to move on..............

TIA



Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #789
Post by: billb's daughter on January 02, 2009, 01:34:53 PM
billb,
I hope you don't mind I'm giving it a bump here so others can see how easy it is.

http://scaredmonkeys.net/index.php?topic=4246.460

billb  12/19/2008

Quote
US State Department
OVERSEAS CITIZENS SERVICES: Call 1-888-407-4747 (from overseas: 202-501-4444) for answers related to questions concerning the:

    * Death of an American citizen abroad
    * Arrest/detention of an American citizen abroad
    * Robbery of an American citizen abroad
    * American citizens missing abroad
    * Crisis abroad involving American citizens
    * After-hours number for an emergency involving an American citizen abroad
To ask a question via email:

http://contact-us.state.gov/cgi-bin/state.cfg/php/enduser/ask.php?p_sid=jxOHQJlj&p_accessibility=0&p_redirect=&p_sp=cF9zcmNoPSZwX3NvcnRfYnk9JnBfZ3JpZHNvcnQ9JnBfcm93X2NudD0xMTEsMTExJnBfcHJvZHM9JnBfY2F0cz0mcF9wdj0mcF9jdj0mcF9zZWFyY2hfdHlwZT1hbnN3ZXJzLnNlYXJjaF9ubCZwX3BhZ2U9MQ**

Copy and paste the bold
 HTTP

It was easy to submit a question on the site:
My question:
Secretary Rice met with the mother (Beth Holloway Twitty) of Natalee Holloway WRT her daughter's disappearance May 30th, 2005. Secretary Rice, after hearing Beth's account of the lack of investigation by the Aruban authorities, directed that the FBI take a closer look into the events surrounding her daughter's disappearance. Can you please provide an update of the actions our State Department, Secretary Rice, and the FBI have taken to ensure there is/will be Justice for Natalee Holloway, a US citizen?
Thank you.
TM....of course I don't mind.. ::MonkeyWink::
Monkeys...I throw out a challenge to you all right now.......send your comments to the links below and if you feel so inclined...post them here at SM......we all want to make a difference for Natalee......this is one of the easiest way...Justice for Natalee.... ::MonkeyCool:: ::MonkeyDance::
DO IT....
Thanks, and come back again.......

bump


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #789 1/1/09 -
Post by: texasmom on January 02, 2009, 01:35:07 PM
http://scaredmonkeys.net/index.php?topic=4328.msg605846#msg605846

Re: Natalee Case Discussion #788 12/31/08 -
« Reply #343 on: December 31, 2008, 05:40:19 PM »  

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Quote from: Magnolia on December 31, 2008, 05:34:29 PM


I just don't understand why people like Mum and Lalas & idstlou and
all of the former posters here are so angry.
Anybody who reads all of this information should see the
truth to it.  They are nitpicking at the least little word.

Why are they so mad about it all?


Response by jen3560

I'll one up you with a question here.........

why are some at that site saying that JUG knew the MAIN goal of the Persistence for that trip was oil related?


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #789
Post by: Blue Moon on January 02, 2009, 01:36:08 PM
billb,
I hope you don't mind I'm giving it a bump here so others can see how easy it is.

http://scaredmonkeys.net/index.php?topic=4246.460

billb  12/19/2008

Quote
US State Department
OVERSEAS CITIZENS SERVICES: Call 1-888-407-4747 (from overseas: 202-501-4444) for answers related to questions concerning the:

    * Death of an American citizen abroad
    * Arrest/detention of an American citizen abroad
    * Robbery of an American citizen abroad
    * American citizens missing abroad
    * Crisis abroad involving American citizens
    * After-hours number for an emergency involving an American citizen abroad
To ask a question via email:

http://contact-us.state.gov/cgi-bin/state.cfg/php/enduser/ask.php?p_sid=jxOHQJlj&p_accessibility=0&p_redirect=&p_sp=cF9zcmNoPSZwX3NvcnRfYnk9JnBfZ3JpZHNvcnQ9JnBfcm93X2NudD0xMTEsMTExJnBfcHJvZHM9JnBfY2F0cz0mcF9wdj0mcF9jdj0mcF9zZWFyY2hfdHlwZT1hbnN3ZXJzLnNlYXJjaF9ubCZwX3BhZ2U9MQ**

Copy and paste the bold
 HTTP

It was easy to submit a question on the site:
My question:
Secretary Rice met with the mother (Beth Holloway Twitty) of Natalee Holloway WRT her daughter's disappearance May 30th, 2005. Secretary Rice, after hearing Beth's account of the lack of investigation by the Aruban authorities, directed that the FBI take a closer look into the events surrounding her daughter's disappearance. Can you please provide an update of the actions our State Department, Secretary Rice, and the FBI have taken to ensure there is/will be Justice for Natalee Holloway, a US citizen?
Thank you.
TM....of course I don't mind.. ::MonkeyWink::
Monkeys...I throw out a challenge to you all right now.......send your comments to the links below and if you feel so inclined...post them here at SM......we all want to make a difference for Natalee......this is one of the easiest way...Justice for Natalee.... ::MonkeyCool:: ::MonkeyDance::
DO IT....
Thanks, and come back again.......

bump

Thanks.  We need to start this yesterday!


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #789 1/1/09 -
Post by: Anna on January 02, 2009, 01:39:25 PM
Thank You, Blue Moon of KY.

Now I wonder which site?  Freebirds or Chatngrumble?

I guess what I really want to know is who said Jug knew this and how did they know?

If this were the case, I wonder why we were asked to donate, etc. as would be a commercial venture.



Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #789 1/1/09 -
Post by: KYcat on January 02, 2009, 01:39:58 PM
Johan555, can you give us any insight into what CAPS is referring to regarding an arrest this week of a major player of the game?



Johann, you are back.  Can you help us out?



an arrest ? i have no idea KYcat  !



I believe Caps said one of the major players was going to be arrested this week johan!Monkey's please correct me if i'm wrong..

that must be Paul or Joran !

Seriously!??  Why, at this point, would they arrest them?  I mean, what charges?  We all know what they have done, but just curious as to the charges.



Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #789 1/1/09 -
Post by: texasmom on January 02, 2009, 01:40:25 PM


Sorry about that Blue Moon, I didn't realize you'd already posted it!  

And like it or not, you ARE part of this family!   ::MonkeyCool::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #789 1/1/09 -
Post by: Tamikosmom on January 02, 2009, 01:40:31 PM


.

Does anyone know where the statement that Jug knew the Persistence was primarily about oil and secondarily about Natalee came from?

Who originally said that and where? 

That is bothering me greatly for some reason or other.


Jug Twitty may have believe that the objective of Persistence undertaking was two fold ... targeting for oil and ... search for his stepdaughter's remains.  I have read "rumors" to the effect very  early on.  Hey ... when you consider John S. profession and ... when you consider Kyle Kingman's profession.

Janet

++++++++

Magnolia
Re: Natalee Case Discussion #788 12/31/08 -
« Reply #337 on: December 31, 2008, 09:34:29 PM »


I just don't understand why people like Mum and Lalas & idstlou and
all of the former posters here are so angry.
Anybody who reads all of this information should see the
truth to it.  They are nitpicking at the least little word.

Why are they so mad about it all?

http://scaredmonkeys.net/index.php?topic=4328.msg605828#msg605828


jen3560
Re: Natalee Case Discussion #788 12/31/08 -
« Reply #343 on: December 31, 2008, 09:40:19 PM »


I'll one up you with a question here.........

why are some at that site saying that JUG knew the MAIN goal of the Persistence for that trip was oil related?

http://scaredmonkeys.net/index.php?topic=4328.msg605846#msg605846



Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #789 1/1/09 -
Post by: Ree on January 02, 2009, 01:41:08 PM
http://scaredmonkeys.net/index.php?topic=4328.msg605846#msg605846

Re: Natalee Case Discussion #788 12/31/08 -
« Reply #343 on: December 31, 2008, 05:40:19 PM »  

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Quote from: Magnolia on December 31, 2008, 05:34:29 PM


I just don't understand why people like Mum and Lalas & idstlou and
all of the former posters here are so angry.
Anybody who reads all of this information should see the
truth to it.  They are nitpicking at the least little word.

Why are they so mad about it all?


Response by jen3560

I'll one up you with a question here.........

why are some at that site saying that JUG knew the MAIN goal of the Persistence for that trip was oil related?

I dunno where that came from, but IF it were true, it might explain why LDSLou (did I get that right) says that Jug has faith in the Persistence crew, no interest in Kermit's revelations, etc.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #789 1/1/09 -
Post by: KYcat on January 02, 2009, 01:42:26 PM
Thank You, Blue Moon of KY.

Now I wonder which site?  Freebirds or Chatngrumble?

I guess what I really want to know is who said Jug knew this and how did they know?

If this were the case, I wonder why we were asked to donate, etc. as would be a commercial venture.



My take on this was this was stated on the Chatngrumble site.  I don't know by whom.  Correct me if I am wrong.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #789 1/1/09 -
Post by: Blue Moon on January 02, 2009, 01:42:43 PM


Sorry about that Blue Moon, I didn't realize you'd already posted it!  

And like it or not, you ARE part of this family!   ::MonkeyCool::

Thanks.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #789 1/1/09 -
Post by: Tamikosmom on January 02, 2009, 01:42:52 PM
Blue Moon of KY

I apologize.  I did not realize that you had already responding to Anna's post regarding Jug Twitty.

Janet


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #789 1/1/09 -
Post by: Anna on January 02, 2009, 01:43:00 PM
Thanks TXMom for the link.  I seem to be going back to that one repeatedly and should just memorize it, lol.



Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #789 1/1/09 -
Post by: texasmom on January 02, 2009, 01:43:37 PM
http://scaredmonkeys.net/index.php?topic=4328.msg605846#msg605846

Re: Natalee Case Discussion #788 12/31/08 -
« Reply #343 on: December 31, 2008, 05:40:19 PM »  

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Quote from: Magnolia on December 31, 2008, 05:34:29 PM


I just don't understand why people like Mum and Lalas & idstlou and
all of the former posters here are so angry.
Anybody who reads all of this information should see the
truth to it.  They are nitpicking at the least little word.

Why are they so mad about it all?


Response by jen3560

I'll one up you with a question here.........

why are some at that site saying that JUG knew the MAIN goal of the Persistence for that trip was oil related?

I dunno where that came from, but IF it were true, it might explain why LDSLou (did I get that right) says that Jug has faith in the Persistence crew, no interest in Kermit's revelations, etc.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #789 1/1/09 -
Post by: texasmom on January 02, 2009, 01:46:12 PM



Sorry, (post that was a no post)  I think I need to get some coffee!  Long night in the cage!   ::MonkeyHaHa::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #789 1/1/09 -
Post by: KYcat on January 02, 2009, 01:47:40 PM



Sorry, (post that was a no post)  I think I need to get some coffee!  Long night in the cage!   ::MonkeyHaHa::

Coffee for me too.  I am going to go clean something.  I will be around............ whether your like it or not!!!!!!!!!!


 ::MonkeyLaugh::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #789
Post by: Edward on January 02, 2009, 01:50:19 PM
CapsLockWizard, do you like to fish?
Poof... the fish is gone.... ::MonkeyWink::

 ::MonkeyHaHa::

the fish is not gone

Hi Caps.  Got anything to add regarding Kyle or John Silvetti?  Clyde Burke?  Jossy Mansur?  Eduardo Mansur? 

 ::MonkeyWink::



The saddest aspect of life right now is that science gathers knowledge faster than society gathers wisdom.

Just watch this week for the arrest of a major player of the game...and probably a big strike in the making and uproar in the house of Babylon.

Question: how many years did the USA took to get Gotti Convicted.?

So like a said: in Colombia they call those that make information up to confuse the issues of this case a SAPO.

How can we hunt for lions while those on this net is working against the work at hand. Watch a movie is not like reading the book of the movie.

In the state the only thing that can be done right now is to pray...since those that scream the loudest are not in the field...but is try to confuse the world.

Things has happend but like I said before. A Sapo war is a lost war....

Remeber 911 ....the first attempt was that the basement, but then the media did give a whole information on how the building was done and how strong it was and where the weakest link were.....where is it now...

if we want to win we have to investigate and not pointing finger to those that are at work...

What ever kyle did and the OE did, I do not know, I was not there. I work alone with a group that can not be put at risk

What I hate the most of this site now is the way the information is twisted, but it is the same method that was use by those that made Natalee desapear, they twist the info.

If anyone to work on the case work on the case. but all that was said is said, we are not working in the future but with info that has been twisted in 2005 and need to be put back straight...

Investigate, but never assume and make thing up or cut and paste and reassamble what people said to proof your own view without knowing the real context in which that particular text was written or no even knowing what was the question to the origin of the text.

Every event in 2005 had a flow and when the truth is change, we allways will have a paradox. and I see it happend here in this forum also or should I call it SM Paradox.

Peter devries tried to put in in a movie but it does not compute, and so a lot is trying to assamble the story.

Read again what I say, how can you hunt lions without a local guide. and put your own magination those all that has tried to build a picture of this case;

and jumb the gun for some momement of sensation, they do not know the real truth, but they do not sit everyday in aruba and continue with the work at hand...all take carefully planning, and all seems to forget one thing, and that is in the question above...to know who (the corrupt Babylons) takes time, but go to war without knowing them is suicidal to all.

CAPS




I do not know you friend..But I read every word you have written and I comprehend the words and I understand how it really is. I really do hope to see something positive in this case that sticks. Colombia and its hierarchy is a very dangerous group who is well funded and used to working within a very corrupted environment in which they control.. Aruba is only a small extension of the same kinds of people. You can't get them on tax evasion..lol

anyways.. quote:
"The saddest aspect of life right now is that science gathers knowledge faster than society gathers wisdom."

Sad but True.  ::MonkeyEek:: But Only because the Truth has been hidden so well by a bunch of Sapos. With that it is hard to say who is telling the truth and who is not.
I still seek the truth.
jmho

 


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #789 1/1/09 -
Post by: Anna on January 02, 2009, 01:51:42 PM
Does anyone have an idea at what point in the ocean search that the detective and his brother met with the Persistence crew?  I'm curious as to if it was before the search began...or at what point?

Kyle said: "Just before Christmas they are contacted by a detective and his brother who gave them information that turned out to be the correct latitude While we were searching shortly before Christmas, we were contacted by an Aruban detective who was involved in the Holloway case. He claimed that his brother had a vision about Natalee¢s body offshore and had coordinates. He and his brother agreed to meet on the Persistence. The detective¢s brother gave what he thought were coordinates, but turned out to be a line of latitude. This latitude aligned with Arashi beach and came within a half mile of the fish trap.


So, they were contacted around the time Caps started posting here.

And didn't Caps say that he himself dove down to the cage (meaning he knew exactly what the latitude/longitude of the cage was)?  The cage was still there, why didn't divers take the cage?  Also, caps says Salvetti said nothing in the cage except plastic-then WHY did they make a dive and retrieve all that "plastic" and then test something within the cage?

Some good questions Blue Moon.....
The more I read the last few days I have come to the following thoughts...
1. The persistence mission did not live up to its advertised  objective.
2. Tim Miller was conned....than removed when he became a 'liability'
3. Kyle questioned the persistence objective after the fact...was given time to do the right thing....but did not
4. John S & Kyle & Caps are somehow intertwined......mhoo..doesn't bode well with the timing of this relationship....best guess...at least a diversion from the cage contents...
5. Idstlou, hotspot and a few others have muddied the posts of the last few days trying to defend john s., kyle, Caps....intentional to throw off the questioning surrounding the contents of the cage? I don't know...but suspect that is part of their agenda.....(are their intentions towards Justice for Natalee good and they are only mislead? I'd like to think so....I respected their posts in the past...but it is still annoying at this time- sorry mum).
6. Kermit has brought the issue with persistence/kyle to SM ( I stand with the frog -green legs and all) and many freebirds left to support Kermit on SM....
The point now is to put all the pressure possible on those in authority (state department - fbi - media/Greta/Peter DVs - dutch - aruba, whomever we have routes to) to expose what the contents of the cage are.....we have pictures...kyle's own words that aruba took cage contents...we need to push this agenda...What was in the cage that aruba divers recovered?
mhoo...billb
 
bump


Sorry for the quote stack.

billb, you will be glad to hear that just because we don't all mention it does not mean we are not emailing, calling, etc.  I have called the Birmingham field office so many times, I am fearful they have opened up a file on ME, lol!

I have also used other occasions to bring up the subject.  Once I was mailed a counterfeit check for $4800 and when reporting it, too advantage of that opportunity to TRY to snooze information from the agent to whom I was speaking.  Information about Natalee.

He admitted to there being new information but said nothing he "could share with YOU!" meaning nosey me. 

But at least I did get the impression their interest in Natalee's disappearance has not waned over time.  Not at all and he was sharp as a tack when I mentioned it, very conversant with the facts, just wouldn't tell me anything other than what has been released officially.

I did try, lol.

He just didn't fall for my cheap tricks!

.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #789 1/1/09 -
Post by: Tamikosmom on January 02, 2009, 01:53:28 PM


.

Does anyone know where the statement that Jug knew the Persistence was primarily about oil and secondarily about Natalee came from?

Who originally said that and where? 

That is bothering me greatly for some reason or other.


Jug Twitty may have believe that the objective of Persistence undertaking was two fold ... targeting for oil and ... search for his stepdaughter's remains.  I have read "rumors" to the effect very  early on.  Hey ... when you consider John S. profession and ... when you consider Kyle Kingman's profession.

Janet

++++++++

Magnolia
Re: Natalee Case Discussion #788 12/31/08 -
« Reply #337 on: December 31, 2008, 09:34:29 PM »


I just don't understand why people like Mum and Lalas & idstlou and
all of the former posters here are so angry.
Anybody who reads all of this information should see the
truth to it.  They are nitpicking at the least little word.

Why are they so mad about it all?

http://scaredmonkeys.net/index.php?topic=4328.msg605828#msg605828


jen3560
Re: Natalee Case Discussion #788 12/31/08 -
« Reply #343 on: December 31, 2008, 09:40:19 PM »


I'll one up you with a question here.........

why are some at that site saying that JUG knew the MAIN goal of the Persistence for that trip was oil related?

http://scaredmonkeys.net/index.php?topic=4328.msg605846#msg605846



Kyle Kingman
Senior Geophysical Project Manager at Alpine Ocean Seismic Survey Inc.
Greater New York City Area


Current
Senior Geophysical Operations Manager at Alpine Ocean Seismic Survey Inc.
 
Past
Manager at Kingman Geophysical Solutions
 
Education
Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey-New Brunswick
 
Industry
Oil & Energy

http://www.linkedin.com/pub/b/65/464



Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #789 1/1/09 -
Post by: Anna on January 02, 2009, 01:57:44 PM
The statement that science gathers knowledge faster than society gathers wisdom was first made about stem cell technology.  It is far from original but what the heck does that have to do with Natalee?



Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #789 1/1/09 -
Post by: texasmom on January 02, 2009, 02:02:41 PM



Sorry, (post that was a no post)  I think I need to get some coffee!  Long night in the cage!   ::MonkeyHaHa::

Coffee for me too.  I am going to go clean something.  I will be around............ whether your like it or not!!!!!!!!!!


 ::MonkeyLaugh::

I love it!!!!!   ::MonkeyHaHa:: ::MonkeyCool::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #789 1/1/09 -
Post by: Keepthefaith on January 02, 2009, 02:02:48 PM
Does this potential arrest have anything to do with Natalee or is it political?If we really think Aruba is gonna arrest a major player then there pretty much gonna have to restructure their whole Govt,as well as arrest a majority of the police force and the judicial which i don't think is gonna happen for some reason! ::MonkeyConfused::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #789 1/1/09 -
Post by: Artcolley on January 02, 2009, 02:06:16 PM
Regarding the "arrest"...
I'll believe it when I see it. I , too, am not holding my breath.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #789 1/1/09 -
Post by: truthseeker2 on January 02, 2009, 02:09:08 PM
Regarding the "arrest"...
I'll believe it when I see it. I , too, am not holding my breath.

The thing about arrests in Aruba is that we have seen them before.  Then they always let them go.  If there is an arrest of a major player, I hope the evidence is solid enough to make it stick.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #789 1/1/09 -
Post by: AZSunny on January 02, 2009, 02:10:41 PM
Johan555, can you give us any insight into what CAPS is referring to regarding an arrest this week of a major player of the game?



Johann, you are back.  Can you help us out?



an arrest ? i have no idea KYcat  !



I believe Caps said one of the major players was going to be arrested this week johan!Monkey's please correct me if i'm wrong..

that must be Paul or Joran !

How can it be Joran if they don't know where he is?  I hope an arrest is made, but I won't hold my breath.  I think we have heard this before, I hope that CAPS is right.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #789 1/1/09 -
Post by: Blue Moon on January 02, 2009, 02:11:20 PM
Regarding the "arrest"...
I'll believe it when I see it. I , too, am not holding my breath.

Exactly.  We have heard that too many times.  It gets old after awhile.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #789 1/1/09 -
Post by: Lifesong on January 02, 2009, 02:12:48 PM


Well, at the risk of offending absolutely everyone on both sides of the fence - I think this needs to be said:

All this talk of "family" is sickeningly self-serving!

The only family that matters in this case is Natalee's.

IMO

 ::MonkeyWaa::    ::MonkeyWaa::    ::MonkeyWaa::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #789 1/1/09 -
Post by: Blue Moon on January 02, 2009, 02:13:49 PM
Regarding the "arrest"...
I'll believe it when I see it. I , too, am not holding my breath.

Exactly.  We have heard that too many times.  It gets old after awhile.

Also, a major player would have to be Joran and they banned him from the island (thought by doing that this would go away, How's that working for you Aruba?).  So I don't believe that at all.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #789 1/1/09 -
Post by: San on January 02, 2009, 02:14:15 PM
Regarding the "arrest"...
I'll believe it when I see it. I , too, am not holding my breath.

I haven't held my breath since I was five.  ::MonkeyHaHa::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #789 1/1/09 -
Post by: Artcolley on January 02, 2009, 02:16:27 PM
Regarding the "arrest"...
I'll believe it when I see it. I , too, am not holding my breath.

I haven't held my breath since I was five.  ::MonkeyHaHa::

hmmm..come to think of it, neither have I. Always seemed rather counterproductive!  ::MonkeyLaugh::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #789 1/1/09 -
Post by: 2NJSons_Mom on January 02, 2009, 02:16:35 PM
Regarding the "arrest"...
I'll believe it when I see it. I , too, am not holding my breath.

The thing about arrests in Aruba is that we have seen them before.  Then they always let them go.  If there is an arrest of a major player, I hope the evidence is solid enough to make it stick.

Nothing like giving major player(s), whoever it may be, a heads up by posting such here.  Brings me back to a singing war is a lost war.  Oh, and the 8th is next Thursday...re: the billiards post.  Fact or fiction?  Just my current thoughts.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #789 1/1/09 -
Post by: Tamikosmom on January 02, 2009, 02:21:02 PM
Regarding the "arrest"...
I'll believe it when I see it. I , too, am not holding my breath.

If someone is detained ... it will in all probability come to naught.

Just another "Dog and Pony Show".

 ::MonkeyNoNo::

Janet

_______

DETENTION OF FORMAL SUSPECTS

Karin Janssen:


1.  Mickey John - first and second-degree murder and capital kidnapping. 06/2005

2.  Abraham Jones - first and second-degree murder and capital kidnapping. 06/2005

3.  Joran van der Sloot - Suspicion of murder and kidnapping as well as being an accessory to murder 06/2005
 
4. Deepak Kalpoe - Suspicion of murder and kidnapping as well as being an accessory to murder. 06/2005

5. Satish Kalpoe - Suspicion of murder and kidnapping as well as being an accessory to murder. 06/2005

6. Steve Croes - Suspicion of murder and kidnapping as well as being an accessory to murder. 06/2005
 
7. Paulus van der Sloot - complicity to pre-meditated murder, complicity to kidnapping and murder and kidnapping. 06/2005

8. Geoffrey van Cromvoirt - criminal offenses that may be related to the disappearance" of Natalee Holloway. 04/2006

9. Guido Weaver - Assisting in the murder, heavy battery and kidnapping" of the teen. 05/2006


Karin Janssen:

Deepak Kalpoe
- Suspected of the primary criminal act of together with other people committing premeditated murder, alternately together with other people murdering somebody, more alternately rob a person of her liberty with fatal consequences and even more alternately, raping somebody and new suspicions. 09/2005

Satish Kalpoe - Suspected of the primary criminal act of together with other people committing premeditated murder, alternately together with other people murdering somebody, more alternately rob a person of her liberty with fatal consequences and even more alternately, raping somebody and new suspicions. 09/2005

Freddy Arambatzis - Suspicion of having unspecified "physical contact" with a female minor. (Unrelated to the Natalee Holloway case.) 09/2005


Hans Mos:

Joran Van der Sloot
-suspicion of involvement in voluntary manslaughter and causing serious bodily harm that resulted in the death of Holloway. 11/2007

Deepak Kalpoe - suspicion of involvement in voluntary manslaughter and causing serious bodily harm that resulted in the death of Holloway. 11/2007

Satish Kalpoe - suspicion of involvement in voluntary manslaughter and causing serious bodily harm that resulted in the death of Holloway. 11/2007


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #789 1/1/09 -
Post by: Blonde on January 02, 2009, 02:21:28 PM
CAPS SAID

So like a said: in colombia they call those that make information up to confuse the issues of this case a SAPO.

FROM WIKI

Sapo is the Portuguese and Spanish term for a toad.

I believe CAPS is telling us that Kermie is deliberately making things up to confuse us.

 ::MonkeyEek::

BS kermit worked with two presidents brought down one.
NO WAY she is deliberately making things up to confuse us.
 I thinks it's Caps that's confusing us.
I also thinks he's more then one poster. JMO


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #789 1/1/09 -
Post by: Anna on January 02, 2009, 02:23:02 PM
Karin Janssen last if June 2005:  Expect major fireworks over the next days.

Dompig:  Expect major break in the case over the weekend.
             Expect major developments within the next 48 hours.

And on and on and on.

We learned the hard way to believe it when we see it and so far, we haven't seen much.  Lots of talk, however.



Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #789 1/1/09 -
Post by: Lifesong on January 02, 2009, 02:23:52 PM

Another of my opinions is this:

Anyone who shows up on the scene 2 & 1/2 years late and claims they are going to solve the case by applying LOGIC is full of sh*t.

Not to mention insulting to our intelligence. 

Everyone who was here the first 2 & 1/2 years knows we were already applying logic. 

GMAB.   ::MonkeyNoNo::

And this person's LOGICAL conclusion is that Joran himself cut her body up into several pieces that very night?  With that timeline?

I can't believe that people actually believe this.

That's my opinion.  (And it was quite easy actually to state it plainly - notice there are no riddles here for anyone to have to guess what I'm trying to say.)



Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #789 1/1/09 -
Post by: Tamikosmom on January 02, 2009, 02:24:52 PM
CAPS SAID

So like a said: in colombia they call those that make information up to confuse the issues of this case a SAPO.

FROM WIKI

Sapo is the Portuguese and Spanish term for a toad.

I believe CAPS is telling us that Kermie is deliberately making things up to confuse us.

 ::MonkeyEek::

BS kermit worked with two presidents brought down one.
NO WAY she is deliberately making things up to confuse us.
 I thinks it's Caps that's confusing us.
I also thinks he's more then one poster. JMO


 ::cartwheel::



Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #789 1/1/09 -
Post by: texasmom on January 02, 2009, 02:28:00 PM


Well, at the risk of offending absolutely everyone on both sides of the fence - I think this needs to be said:

All this talk of "family" is sickeningly self-serving!

The only family that matters in this case is Natalee's.

IMO

 ::MonkeyWaa::    ::MonkeyWaa::    ::MonkeyWaa::


Sorry you feel that way but as Private Eye stated many months ago, all of us here seeking Justice for Natalee have become part of that family too! 

http://scaredmonkeys.net/index.php?topic=2689.msg364069#msg364069

Quote
To tell you the truth you all have become a part of Natalee's family

JUSTICE FOR NATALEE!!!!


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #789 1/1/09 -
Post by: Magnolia on January 02, 2009, 02:28:38 PM
CAPS SAID

So like a said: in colombia they call those that make information up to confuse the issues of this case a SAPO.

FROM WIKI

Sapo is the Portuguese and Spanish term for a toad.

I believe CAPS is telling us that Kermie is deliberately making things up to confuse us.

 ::MonkeyEek::

BS kermit worked with two presidents brought down one.
NO WAY she is deliberately making things up to confuse us.
I thinks it's Caps that's confusing us.
I also thinks he's more then one poster. JMO


I agree B;onde.  I think that is Caps JOB.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #789 1/1/09 -
Post by: Blue Moon on January 02, 2009, 02:29:38 PM

Another of my opinions is this:

Anyone who shows up on the scene 2 & 1/2 years late and claims they are going to solve the case by applying LOGIC is full of sh*t.

Not to mention insulting to our intelligence. 

Everyone who was here the first 2 & 1/2 years knows we were already applying logic. 

GMAB.   ::MonkeyNoNo::

And this person's LOGICAL conclusion is that Joran himself cut her body up into several pieces that very night?  With that timeline?

I can't believe that people actually believe this.

That's my opinion.  (And it was quite easy actually to state it plainly - notice there are no riddles here for anyone to have to guess what I'm trying to say.)



Logic always comes into play when we are talking about Aruba!  NOTHING has been logical about them from the beginning.  Why start now.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #789 1/1/09 -
Post by: Edward on January 02, 2009, 02:29:40 PM
The statement that science gathers knowledge faster than society gathers wisdom was first made about stem cell technology.  It is far from original but what the heck does that have to do with Natalee?



I think it was said way before stem cells.. I have said the same thing for MANY years.

It is so sad that we have advanced so far technologically but as a human race we have advanced very little if any at all .. A world that is just as brutal today as it was hundreds of years ago. Everyone has there own agenda and is willing to kill you or your children to advance that agenda without any concern.
Greed and envy is both the curse and the driving force in mankind.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #789 1/1/09 -
Post by: Tamikosmom on January 02, 2009, 02:33:08 PM


Well, at the risk of offending absolutely everyone on both sides of the fence - I think this needs to be said:

All this talk of "family" is sickeningly self-serving!

The only family that matters in this case is Natalee's.

IMO

 ::MonkeyWaa::    ::MonkeyWaa::    ::MonkeyWaa::


Sorry you feel that way but as Private Eye stated many months ago, all of us here seeking Justice for Natalee have become part of that family too! 

http://scaredmonkeys.net/index.php?topic=2689.msg364069#msg364069

Quote
To tell you the truth you all have become a part of Natalee's family

JUSTICE FOR NATALEE!!!!


Thanks for the reminder texasmom.

Janet



Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #789 1/1/09 -
Post by: Artcolley on January 02, 2009, 02:35:44 PM
Seems to me that the goal is to cut through the BS, find this child and bring her home.
All this Mumbo Jumbo is just diversion.

Kermit has backed up everything she/he has stated and has had others come forward to vouch for her. She doesn't engage in MumboJumbo. Just plain talk, backed up by links.

I would say if anyone can help cut through the BS it would be Kermit.

I will also add as an aside, That Shango stuff lost me at the beginning when the name wasn't even spelled right. They "Americanized" it in spelling. I decided right then that it was a diversionary tactic aimed at Gullible American people to go off on a merry tangent trying to figure it out while the real facts remained covered up. It was a side show.
How do I know this? I have the "feathers" to prove it, lol ::MonkeyCool::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #789 1/1/09 -
Post by: Lifesong on January 02, 2009, 02:42:52 PM


Well, at the risk of offending absolutely everyone on both sides of the fence - I think this needs to be said:

All this talk of "family" is sickeningly self-serving!

The only family that matters in this case is Natalee's.

IMO

 ::MonkeyWaa::    ::MonkeyWaa::    ::MonkeyWaa::


Sorry you feel that way but as Private Eye stated many months ago, all of us here seeking Justice for Natalee have become part of that family too! 

http://scaredmonkeys.net/index.php?topic=2689.msg364069#msg364069

Quote
To tell you the truth you all have become a part of Natalee's family

JUSTICE FOR NATALEE!!!!


Thanks for the reminder texasmom.

Janet


I understand your point, Texasmom, and appreciate you making it.

My point was that the stated importance of the now endangered relationships & friendships made by posters of this forum and others, over the course of this journey should not be taking center stage.  That has nothing to do with what happened to Natalee and is therefore self-serving.





Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #789 1/1/09 -
Post by: Artcolley on January 02, 2009, 02:43:32 PM
Um...that should have read, "The real facts remained covered up"

I need more coffee, I think.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #789 1/1/09 -
Post by: texasmom on January 02, 2009, 02:43:51 PM

Great post Artcolley!   ::MonkeyCool::

Quote
Seems to me that the goal is to cut through the BS, find this child and bring her home.

 ::MonkeyDance::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #789 1/1/09 -
Post by: Keepthefaith on January 02, 2009, 02:46:26 PM
Um...that should have read, "The real facts remained covered up"

I need more coffee, I think.

Just got my second cup! ::MonkeyDance:: JUSTICE FOR NATALEE is all this is about.The only Glory this is about is brining Natalee home..... ::MonkeyDance:: ::MonkeyDance::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #789 1/1/09 -
Post by: Tamikosmom on January 02, 2009, 02:46:28 PM
Magnolia

How was that New Years Day "feast" you were preparing for your family?

Happy New Year!

Janet


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #789 1/1/09 -
Post by: Artcolley on January 02, 2009, 02:46:32 PM

Great post Artcolley!   ::MonkeyCool::

Quote
Seems to me that the goal is to cut through the BS, find this child and bring her home.

 ::MonkeyDance::

Thank you! lol! It appears I am not very articulate this afternoon, though!  ::cartwheel::

{I fixed your previous post for you Art}


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #789 1/1/09 -
Post by: Artcolley on January 02, 2009, 02:47:44 PM
Um...that should have read, "The real facts remained covered up"

I need more coffee, I think.

Just got my second cup! ::MonkeyDance:: JUSTICE FOR NATALEE is all this is about.The only Glory this is about is brining Natalee home..... ::MonkeyDance:: ::MonkeyDance::

I agree totally. We all just need to keep our eye on the ball and not get distracted, I think.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #789 1/1/09 -
Post by: Keepthefaith on January 02, 2009, 02:48:31 PM
Regarding the "arrest"...
I'll believe it when I see it. I , too, am not holding my breath.

If someone is detained ... it will in all probability come to naught.

Just another "Dog and Pony Show".

 ::MonkeyNoNo::

Janet

_______

DETENTION OF FORMAL SUSPECTS

Karin Janssen:


1.  Mickey John - first and second-degree murder and capital kidnapping. 06/2005

2.  Abraham Jones - first and second-degree murder and capital kidnapping. 06/2005

3.  Joran van der Sloot - Suspicion of murder and kidnapping as well as being an accessory to murder 06/2005
 
4. Deepak Kalpoe - Suspicion of murder and kidnapping as well as being an accessory to murder. 06/2005

5. Satish Kalpoe - Suspicion of murder and kidnapping as well as being an accessory to murder. 06/2005

6. Steve Croes - Suspicion of murder and kidnapping as well as being an accessory to murder. 06/2005
 
7. Paulus van der Sloot - complicity to pre-meditated murder, complicity to kidnapping and murder and kidnapping. 06/2005

8. Geoffrey van Cromvoirt - criminal offenses that may be related to the disappearance" of Natalee Holloway. 04/2006

9. Guido Weaver - Assisting in the murder, heavy battery and kidnapping" of the teen. 05/2006


Karin Janssen:

Deepak Kalpoe
- Suspected of the primary criminal act of together with other people committing premeditated murder, alternately together with other people murdering somebody, more alternately rob a person of her liberty with fatal consequences and even more alternately, raping somebody and new suspicions. 09/2005

Satish Kalpoe - Suspected of the primary criminal act of together with other people committing premeditated murder, alternately together with other people murdering somebody, more alternately rob a person of her liberty with fatal consequences and even more alternately, raping somebody and new suspicions. 09/2005

Freddy Arambatzis - Suspicion of having unspecified "physical contact" with a female minor. (Unrelated to the Natalee Holloway case.) 09/2005


Hans Mos:

Joran Van der Sloot
-suspicion of involvement in voluntary manslaughter and causing serious bodily harm that resulted in the death of Holloway. 11/2007

Deepak Kalpoe - suspicion of involvement in voluntary manslaughter and causing serious bodily harm that resulted in the death of Holloway. 11/2007

Satish Kalpoe - suspicion of involvement in voluntary manslaughter and causing serious bodily harm that resulted in the death of Holloway. 11/2007


Seems like we've already arrested some MAJOR players,as well as some innocent people for the sake of the start of the cover-up! ::MonkeyCool::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #789 1/1/09 -
Post by: texasmom on January 02, 2009, 02:49:01 PM


Well, at the risk of offending absolutely everyone on both sides of the fence - I think this needs to be said:

All this talk of "family" is sickeningly self-serving!

The only family that matters in this case is Natalee's.

IMO

 ::MonkeyWaa::    ::MonkeyWaa::    ::MonkeyWaa::


Sorry you feel that way but as Private Eye stated many months ago, all of us here seeking Justice for Natalee have become part of that family too! 

http://scaredmonkeys.net/index.php?topic=2689.msg364069#msg364069

Quote
To tell you the truth you all have become a part of Natalee's family

JUSTICE FOR NATALEE!!!!


Thanks for the reminder texasmom.

Janet


I understand your point, Texasmom, and appreciate you making it.

My point was that the stated importance of the now endangered relationships & friendships made by posters of this forum and others, over the course of this journey should not be taking center stage.  That has nothing to do with what happened to Natalee and is therefore self-serving.

I agree Lifesong!  


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #789 1/1/09 -
Post by: Anna on January 02, 2009, 02:54:26 PM
Seems to me that the goal is to cut through the BS, find this child and bring her home.
All this Mumbo Jumbo is just diversion.

Kermit has backed up everything she/he has stated and has had others come forward to vouch for her. She doesn't engage in MumboJumbo. Just plain talk, backed up by links.

I would say if anyone can help cut through the BS it would be Kermit.

I will also add as an aside, That Shango stuff lost me at the beginning when the name wasn't even spelled right. They "Americanized" it in spelling. I decided right then that it was a diversionary tactic aimed at Gullible American people to go off on a merry tangent trying to figure it out while the real facts went uncovered. It was a side show.
How do I know this? I have the "feathers" to prove it, lol ::MonkeyCool::


It lost me when I found "House of Rave" "Babylonians" "Elders" and almost all the repeated terms in Marvel Comic series, lol.  Road paved with gold bricks, it's all in there.  X-Men and Wolverine series.  I Didn't rear three boys for nothing.




(http://i15.photobucket.com/albums/a360/AnnaBlueSkies/Holloway/raveironfist4.jpg)



Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #789 1/1/09 -
Post by: Ree on January 02, 2009, 02:54:52 PM
Regarding the "arrest"...
I'll believe it when I see it. I , too, am not holding my breath.

The thing about arrests in Aruba is that we have seen them before.  Then they always let them go.  If there is an arrest of a major player, I hope the evidence is solid enough to make it stick.

Nothing like giving major player(s), whoever it may be, a heads up by posting such here.  Brings me back to a singing war is a lost war.  Oh, and the 8th is next Thursday...re: the billiards post.  Fact or fiction?  Just my current thoughts.

What did I miss?  What's the significance of the 8th?


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #789 1/1/09 -
Post by: Keepthefaith on January 02, 2009, 02:58:38 PM
Regarding the "arrest"...
I'll believe it when I see it. I , too, am not holding my breath.

The thing about arrests in Aruba is that we have seen them before.  Then they always let them go.  If there is an arrest of a major player, I hope the evidence is solid enough to make it stick.

I believe JQK,Brinkman and potentially Greta will be in Aruba.Correct me if i'm wrong Monkey's..

Nothing like giving major player(s), whoever it may be, a heads up by posting such here.  Brings me back to a singing war is a lost war.  Oh, and the 8th is next Thursday...re: the billiards post.  Fact or fiction?  Just my current thoughts.

What did I miss?  What's the significance of the 8th?


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #789 1/1/09 -
Post by: Keepthefaith on January 02, 2009, 02:59:20 PM
Regarding the "arrest"...
I'll believe it when I see it. I , too, am not holding my breath.

The thing about arrests in Aruba is that we have seen them before.  Then they always let them go.  If there is an arrest of a major player, I hope the evidence is solid enough to make it stick.

I believe JQK,Brinkman and potentially Greta will be in Aruba.Correct me if i'm wrong Monkey's..

Nothing like giving major player(s), whoever it may be, a heads up by posting such here.  Brings me back to a singing war is a lost war.  Oh, and the 8th is next Thursday...re: the billiards post.  Fact or fiction?  Just my current thoughts.

What did I miss?  What's the significance of the 8th?

Messed up the last one.Sorry!

I believe JQK,Brinkman and potentially Greta will be in Aruba.Correct me if i'm wrong Monkey's..


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #789 1/1/09 -
Post by: texasmom on January 02, 2009, 03:03:07 PM
Regarding the "arrest"...
I'll believe it when I see it. I , too, am not holding my breath.

The thing about arrests in Aruba is that we have seen them before.  Then they always let them go.  If there is an arrest of a major player, I hope the evidence is solid enough to make it stick.

Nothing like giving major player(s), whoever it may be, a heads up by posting such here.  Brings me back to a singing war is a lost war.  Oh, and the 8th is next Thursday...re: the billiards post.  Fact or fiction?  Just my current thoughts.

What did I miss?  What's the significance of the 8th?

Please forgive my being vague.  I am going to try to explain this without much detail because I don't want to offend the source.  On the 8th, due to a completely different matter than the one at hand; the hope was to bring about further activities that would have been a benefit to this case.  The 8th was a disappointment, it didn't turn out as hoped; and therefore did not further the attempts to find answers in this case.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #789 1/1/09 -
Post by: Anna on January 02, 2009, 03:04:36 PM
(http://i15.photobucket.com/albums/a360/AnnaBlueSkies/Holloway/which_20lie_small.jpg)


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #789 1/1/09 -
Post by: 2NJSons_Mom on January 02, 2009, 03:04:57 PM
Regarding the "arrest"...
I'll believe it when I see it. I , too, am not holding my breath.

The thing about arrests in Aruba is that we have seen them before.  Then they always let them go.  If there is an arrest of a major player, I hope the evidence is solid enough to make it stick.

Nothing like giving major player(s), whoever it may be, a heads up by posting such here.  Brings me back to a singing war is a lost war.  Oh, and the 8th is next Thursday...re: the billiards post.  Fact or fiction?  Just my current thoughts.

What did I miss?  What's the significance of the 8th?

Caps quote:

Quote
MOS is out and with no power anymore.... like billiard, the 8 ball is in the middle and cue is align to break so all will fall in the right poket. watch the 8th

http://scaredmonkeys.net/index.php?topic=3363.440

There was some discussion about what he meant.  Some thought it was a date.  I was not convinced, and thought he was just speaking of billiards...eight ball. 

I read all of his posts but did not have the 'wisdom' to understand it all. 

My previous post was meant to requestion those statements, not back them.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #789 1/1/09 -
Post by: hotping on January 02, 2009, 03:09:56 PM
Regarding the "arrest"...
I'll believe it when I see it. I , too, am not holding my breath.

The thing about arrests in Aruba is that we have seen them before.  Then they always let them go.  If there is an arrest of a major player, I hope the evidence is solid enough to make it stick.

Nothing like giving major player(s), whoever it may be, a heads up by posting such here.  Brings me back to a singing war is a lost war.  Oh, and the 8th is next Thursday...re: the billiards post.  Fact or fiction?  Just my current thoughts.

What did I miss?  What's the significance of the 8th?

Please forgive my being vague.  I am going to try to explain this without much detail because I don't want to offend the source.  On the 8th, due to a completely different matter than the one at hand; the hope was to bring about further activities that would have been a benefit to this case.  The 8th was a disappointment, it didn't turn out as hoped; and therefore did not further the attempts to find answers in this case.
Thank You TM!  ::MonkeyCool::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #789
Post by: bastibro on January 02, 2009, 03:11:27 PM
Isn't it tomorrow that JQK and Hero Brinkman and Greta are
to descend on Aruba?

the Dutch Members of Parliament (including Brinkman) are travelling first to Curaçao today (January 2nd).

then on to Aruba, with meetings from January 5th until January 9th.
on January 11th they travel back to The Netherlands.

Thanks, caesu.  Maybe some sparks will begin to fly in the Caribbean this coming week!

There will certainly be a lot of tension over there  ::MonkeyHaHa::

Do you think Hero will meet with Jan VDS?  How about Rudy?  I would love to be a fly on the wall in those meetings. ::MonkeyLaugh::

I would be surprised if Van Der Straaten is on Aruba next week.  They could meet with Rudy, though.  I hope Greta is down there for the entire time and Hero gives her all the scoop.

 ::MonkeyHaHa:: I don`t think Brinkman will have conversations with van der Straten, however in a `normal`situation he would meet Rudy. I`m not so sure if Rudy is interested in a meeting now.
IIRC Rudy went on a business trip to Bonaire the last time Dutch parliamentarians came to Aruba  ::MonkeyHaHa::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #789 1/1/09 -
Post by: San on January 02, 2009, 03:14:45 PM
(http://i15.photobucket.com/albums/a360/AnnaBlueSkies/Holloway/which_20lie_small.jpg)

So true.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #789 1/1/09 -
Post by: texasmom on January 02, 2009, 03:16:15 PM



You're welcome Hotping!   ::MonkeyCool::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #789
Post by: Blue Moon on January 02, 2009, 03:17:06 PM
Isn't it tomorrow that JQK and Hero Brinkman and Greta are
to descend on Aruba?

the Dutch Members of Parliament (including Brinkman) are travelling first to Curaçao today (January 2nd).

then on to Aruba, with meetings from January 5th until January 9th.
on January 11th they travel back to The Netherlands.

Thanks, caesu.  Maybe some sparks will begin to fly in the Caribbean this coming week!

There will certainly be a lot of tension over there  ::MonkeyHaHa::

Do you think Hero will meet with Jan VDS?  How about Rudy?  I would love to be a fly on the wall in those meetings. ::MonkeyLaugh::

I would be surprised if Van Der Straaten is on Aruba next week.  They could meet with Rudy, though.  I hope Greta is down there for the entire time and Hero gives her all the scoop.

 ::MonkeyHaHa:: I don`t think Brinkman will have conversations with van der Straten, however in a `normal`situation he would meet Rudy. I`m not so sure if Rudy is interested in a meeting now.
IIRC Rudy went on a business trip to Bonaire the last time Dutch parliamentarians came to Aruba  ::MonkeyHaHa::

Who would Hero be meeting with?  Sounds like no one on Aruba wants him around.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #789 1/1/09 -
Post by: Artcolley on January 02, 2009, 03:17:13 PM
Seems to me that the goal is to cut through the BS, find this child and bring her home.
All this Mumbo Jumbo is just diversion.

Kermit has backed up everything she/he has stated and has had others come forward to vouch for her. She doesn't engage in MumboJumbo. Just plain talk, backed up by links.

I would say if anyone can help cut through the BS it would be Kermit.

I will also add as an aside, That Shango stuff lost me at the beginning when the name wasn't even spelled right. They "Americanized" it in spelling. I decided right then that it was a diversionary tactic aimed at Gullible American people to go off on a merry tangent trying to figure it out while the real facts went uncovered. It was a side show.
How do I know this? I have the "feathers" to prove it, lol ::MonkeyCool::


It lost me when I found "House of Rave" "Babylonians" "Elders" and almost all the repeated terms in Marvel Comic series, lol.  Road paved with gold bricks, it's all in there.  X-Men and Wolverine series.  I Didn't rear three boys for nothing.




(http://i15.photobucket.com/albums/a360/AnnaBlueSkies/Holloway/raveironfist4.jpg)



Yep! lol!
A lot can be learned in those comic books  ::MonkeyHaHa::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #789 1/1/09 -
Post by: MumInOhio on January 02, 2009, 03:26:22 PM
MumInOhio

I would appreciate it if you would go back to your little group and get your facts straight.

It was NOT ME who first posted the photo of the CMB bank next to Digicel.

The reason I know this is because I posted that photo at FREEBIRDS!

IT WAS DAYHIKER who took the photo from Freebirds and posted it here at SM[/b]

In addition:
If you are confused by truth, then you need to sit down and have it out with your group.
BECAUSE if you HAD, you would have known that it was me that was asked to BY THOSE
SPECIFIC members of your group to FIND OUT INFORMATION ON CAPS!

I do not recall posting Montanja 10.
If I did, please give me the link to my post.

I do recall posting Catrini 7.
Lalasmom, your group member not only continued to query me about it, but also emailed me asking me
why I posted it because it was near where CAPS lived! Which differed from the address that CAPS gave
to DAVE and the FBI!

Want me to post the email? I will be more then happy to do so.


Call it drive-bys or untruth or whatever word you want to come up with.

I DID THAT - FOR THEM

If you think for one minute that I can not back up and show the emails to prove what I am saying
 IS THE TRUTH - you are sorely mistaken.

Call me whatever names, insinuate whatever you want, but I have the proof.

Now, go find yourself someone else to slander.


Do not bother responding to me.
Do not bother apologizing to me.
You are forgiven.
But I won't respond to you ever again.





Kermit...

Excuse me...I am slandering You?

I questioned your posts. This is what I do. I ask questions. I want the details straight.  I questioned that address the very next morning after you first posted it in Shango.


Because I respected you and your posts I spent a lot of time and effort looking for a  connection to Freddy Zedan and 7A Catiri. I actually believed you when you posted that Frederick Arends was Freddy Zedan's father. Even after I found a social site for Frederick and his young son. I am sorry, but I do not recall what it was that made me change my mind and realize that what you had posted was incorrect.


You can be sure that I will ask Lalas about 7A Catiri. I will ask because I want the truth.


From your post this is what I see, please correct me if I am wrong...
 

You posted and reposted incorrect information at the request of another member of this Forum. Even though you knew this was incorrect information, you kept posting this address as belonging to Freddy Zedan.

Would you care to elaborate as to why you posted that Frederick Arends was Freddy Zedan's father.

Would you mind clarifying for myself and the others on this Forum how many times you have done this? This being posting incorrect information at the request of another Forum member.


Somehow, I do not think it is me that needs to be forgiven, Kermit.

And I do not think I am the one that needs to be making any apologies either.


Mum has an Agenda - Justice For Natalee


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #789 1/1/09 -
Post by: Tamikosmom on January 02, 2009, 03:26:56 PM
Regarding the "arrest"...
I'll believe it when I see it. I , too, am not holding my breath.

The thing about arrests in Aruba is that we have seen them before.  Then they always let them go.  If there is an arrest of a major player, I hope the evidence is solid enough to make it stick.

Nothing like giving major player(s), whoever it may be, a heads up by posting such here.  Brings me back to a singing war is a lost war.  Oh, and the 8th is next Thursday...re: the billiards post.  Fact or fiction?  Just my current thoughts.

What did I miss?  What's the significance of the 8th?

Caps quote:

Quote
MOS is out and with no power anymore.... like billiard, the 8 ball is in the middle and cue is align to break so all will fall in the right poket. watch the 8th

http://scaredmonkeys.net/index.php?topic=3363.440

There was some discussion about what he meant.  Some thought it was a date.  I was not convinced, and thought he was just speaking of billiards...eight ball. 

I read all of his posts but did not have the 'wisdom' to understand it all. 

My previous post was meant to requestion those statements, not back them.

2NJSons_Mom ... I also lacked the "wisdom" to comprehend ... to interpret.

 ::MonkeyHaHa::

Janet


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #789 1/1/09 -
Post by: 2NJSons_Mom on January 02, 2009, 03:32:46 PM
Janet, you said it much better than I.    ::MonkeyWink::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #789 1/1/09 -
Post by: Anna on January 02, 2009, 03:34:49 PM
Janet, you said it much better than I.    ::MonkeyWink::



Yes, even Aruban taxi drivers are fluent in many languages.  Or so they claim.

Too bad none of them are ever English.  But then perhaps that would spoil all the fun?


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #789 1/1/09 -
Post by: Anna on January 02, 2009, 03:37:07 PM
Well, how much "wisdom" is required just to tell the truth?

All we have asked Aruba for is an accounting of our citizen.  We have every right to do this and expect an honest and factual reply. 

To date, we have never received anything even close to being believable.



Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #789 1/1/09 -
Post by: San on January 02, 2009, 03:42:02 PM
Well, how much "wisdom" is required just to tell the truth?

All we have asked Aruba for is an accounting of our citizen.  We have every right to do this and expect an honest and factual reply. 

To date, we have never received anything even close to being believable.

You have to remember the lies you tell but you don't have to remember the truth because the truth is always there.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #789 1/1/09 -
Post by: Keepthefaith on January 02, 2009, 03:44:11 PM
Well, how much "wisdom" is required just to tell the truth?

All we have asked Aruba for is an accounting of our citizen.  We have every right to do this and expect an honest and factual reply. 

To date, we have never received anything even close to being believable.

You have to remember the lies you tell but you don't have to remember the truth because the truth is always there.

 ::MonkeyDance:: ::MonkeyDance::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #789 1/1/09 -
Post by: texasmom on January 02, 2009, 03:44:36 PM
Distractions, distractions, distractions...  I think we may even have a special thread for that here.  

Spent some time there myself.   ::MonkeyHaHa::

Quote
The words pathetic, laughable and wrong come to mind.
 

Words posted by a very wise woman.   ::MonkeyCool::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #789 1/1/09 -
Post by: klaasend on January 02, 2009, 03:47:11 PM
O/T
http://www.tmz.com/

John Travolta's Son Dies
Posted Jan 2nd 2009 3:10PM by TMZ Staff

Rand Memorial Hospital in the Bahamas tells TMZ the son of John Travolta died today.

We're told 16-year-old Jett was vacationing with Travolta and wife Kelly Preston. We do not know the circumstances of his death.

There have been reports that Jett was autistic, though Travolta has denied it, saying he suffers from Kawasaki Syndrome, a condition which often leads to heart disease.



Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #789 1/1/09 -
Post by: texasmom on January 02, 2009, 03:48:57 PM
O/T
http://www.tmz.com/

John Travolta's Son Dies
Posted Jan 2nd 2009 3:10PM by TMZ Staff

Rand Memorial Hospital in the Bahamas tells TMZ the son of John Travolta died today.

We're told 16-year-old Jett was vacationing with Travolta and wife Kelly Preston. We do not know the circumstances of his death.

There have been reports that Jett was autistic, though Travolta has denied it, saying he suffers from Kawasaki Syndrome, a condition which often leads to heart disease.



How sad, thanks for letting us know Klaas.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #789 1/1/09 -
Post by: Blue Moon on January 02, 2009, 03:50:12 PM
O/T
http://www.tmz.com/

John Travolta's Son Dies
Posted Jan 2nd 2009 3:10PM by TMZ Staff

Rand Memorial Hospital in the Bahamas tells TMZ the son of John Travolta died today.

We're told 16-year-old Jett was vacationing with Travolta and wife Kelly Preston. We do not know the circumstances of his death.

There have been reports that Jett was autistic, though Travolta has denied it, saying he suffers from Kawasaki Syndrome, a condition which often leads to heart disease.



I just read that. Sad.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #789 1/1/09 -
Post by: truthseeker2 on January 02, 2009, 03:50:14 PM
O/T
http://www.tmz.com/

John Travolta's Son Dies
Posted Jan 2nd 2009 3:10PM by TMZ Staff

Rand Memorial Hospital in the Bahamas tells TMZ the son of John Travolta died today.

We're told 16-year-old Jett was vacationing with Travolta and wife Kelly Preston. We do not know the circumstances of his death.

There have been reports that Jett was autistic, though Travolta has denied it, saying he suffers from Kawasaki Syndrome, a condition which often leads to heart disease.



Oh no!!!  That is so sad.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #789 1/1/09 -
Post by: caesu on January 02, 2009, 04:00:16 PM
Quote
Aruba
`Brinkman often stands alone'
2 Jan, 2009, 14:00 (GMT -04:00)

Oranjestad - the Dutch Member of Parliament Hero Brinkman (PVV) also stands often alone within the Dutch delegation, says CDA-Member of Paliament Jan van Bochove. Van Bochove reacts to the question if, during the parliamentary consultation kingdom relations (POK) that coming Monday 5 January will start, difficulties will be expected because of the presence of the outspoken member of Parliament. I expect that this time, just like during the POK in June in the Netherlands, there will be tough discussions and antagonisms, but that one is prepared to each other to listen, thus the CDA-kamerlid tells during an interview with the World Service (WereldOmroep).
Brinkman said beginning December 2008 about Aruba `They are corrupt ash hell'. He did this pronouncement during an interview with the American TV station Fox concerning the disappearance of Natalee Holloway.
During POK, which startd coming Monday, Dutch, antillian and Arubaanse members of Parliament will conduct consultation with each other. The most important conversation subject probably will be the state developments within the kingdom. The consequences of the decisions which have been taken during the last round table conference (RTC) will exhaustively be discussed, thus thinks Van Bochove. The Member of Parliament lays from that the decisions who must come about in the different countries in good consultation must be discussed, particularly if it concerns consensus realm laws. This year must be cut knots concerning a large number of bills and decide in this context. This will go probably not always even easily. It will clash the coming year regularly, thus Van Bochove. The future Court of Justice will be also again discussed.

http://www.amigoe.com/artman/publish/printer_51091.php
Quote
Brinkman
What Hero Brinkman (PVV) concerns, with which Antillian Members of Parliament during POK on Curaçao did not want to talk, as a result of which the complete consultation did not continue, expects Van Bochove `that it this time exactly goes like the way it went during a parliamentary consultation in June in the Netherlands'. Then mister Brinkman was also present, there with him has been discussed all kinds of matter. From that large antagonisms were proved to exist, but one had been prepared then to listen to eachother and exchange ideas.

http://www.amigoe.com/artman/publish/artikel_51121.php


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #789 1/1/09 -
Post by: Blonde on January 02, 2009, 04:02:29 PM
O/T
http://www.tmz.com/

John Travolta's Son Dies
Posted Jan 2nd 2009 3:10PM by TMZ Staff

Rand Memorial Hospital in the Bahamas tells TMZ the son of John Travolta died today.

We're told 16-year-old Jett was vacationing with Travolta and wife Kelly Preston. We do not know the circumstances of his death.

There have been reports that Jett was autistic, though Travolta has denied it, saying he suffers from Kawasaki Syndrome, a condition which often leads to heart disease.



LOS ANGELES, Calif. --

John Travolta’s 16-year-old son, Jett, has died after a hotel accident in the Bahamas, according to TMZ.

The actor and his family were on vacation at the Old Bahama Bay hotel on the Grand Bahama island, when Jett fell and hit his head on the bathtub, a source told Access on Friday at 10 AM PST.

Following the accident, Jett Travolta was taken to Rand Memorial Hospital in the Bahamas.

TMZ said a spokesperson at the hospital confirmed the teen’s death.

When contacted by Access Hollywood, an employee at the Old Bahama Bay hotel, where Travolta owns several beachfront units, said she was “not allowed to talk about [the incident].”

Jett was one of two children for the actor and his wife, Kelly Preston. The couple also has an 8-year-old daughter, Ella Bleu.

Travolta, 54, and Preston, 46, were married in September 1991. Jett was born the following April.

Copyright 2008 by NBC Universal, Inc. All rights reserved.

http://www.accesshollywood.com/report-john-travoltas-teen-son-dies-following-fall-at-bahamas-hotel_article_12857


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #789 1/1/09 -
Post by: texasmom on January 02, 2009, 04:16:22 PM
Quote
Aruba
`Brinkman often stands alone'
2 Jan, 2009, 14:00 (GMT -04:00)

Oranjestad - the Dutch Member of Parliament Hero Brinkman (PVV) also stands often alone within the Dutch delegation, says CDA-Member of Paliament Jan van Bochove. Van Bochove reacts to the question if, during the parliamentary consultation kingdom relations (POK) that coming Monday 5 January will start, difficulties will be expected because of the presence of the outspoken member of Parliament. I expect that this time, just like during the POK in June in the Netherlands, there will be tough discussions and antagonisms, but that one is prepared to each other to listen, thus the CDA-kamerlid tells during an interview with the World Service (WereldOmroep).
Brinkman said beginning December 2008 about Aruba `They are corrupt ash hell'. He did this pronouncement during an interview with the American TV station Fox concerning the disappearance of Natalee Holloway.
During POK, which startd coming Monday, Dutch, antillian and Arubaanse members of Parliament will conduct consultation with each other. The most important conversation subject probably will be the state developments within the kingdom. The consequences of the decisions which have been taken during the last round table conference (RTC) will exhaustively be discussed, thus thinks Van Bochove. The Member of Parliament lays from that the decisions who must come about in the different countries in good consultation must be discussed, particularly if it concerns consensus realm laws. This year must be cut knots concerning a large number of bills and decide in this context. This will go probably not always even easily. It will clash the coming year regularly, thus Van Bochove. The future Court of Justice will be also again discussed.

http://www.amigoe.com/artman/publish/printer_51091.php
Quote
Brinkman
What Hero Brinkman (PVV) concerns, with which Antillian Members of Parliament during POK on Curaçao did not want to talk, as a result of which the complete consultation did not continue, expects Van Bochove `that it this time exactly goes like the way it went during a parliamentary consultation in June in the Netherlands'. Then mister Brinkman was also present, there with him has been discussed all kinds of matter. From that large antagonisms were proved to exist, but one had been prepared then to listen to eachother and exchange ideas.

http://www.amigoe.com/artman/publish/artikel_51121.php

Thanks caesu!


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #789 1/1/09 -
Post by: Artcolley on January 02, 2009, 04:23:21 PM
O/T
http://www.tmz.com/

John Travolta's Son Dies
Posted Jan 2nd 2009 3:10PM by TMZ Staff

Rand Memorial Hospital in the Bahamas tells TMZ the son of John Travolta died today.

We're told 16-year-old Jett was vacationing with Travolta and wife Kelly Preston. We do not know the circumstances of his death.

There have been reports that Jett was autistic, though Travolta has denied it, saying he suffers from Kawasaki Syndrome, a condition which often leads to heart disease.



Aw, that is very sad.

Thanks for posting this.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #789 1/1/09 -
Post by: ldstlou on January 02, 2009, 04:35:57 PM
CAPS SAID

So like a said: in colombia they call those that make information up to confuse the issues of this case a SAPO.

FROM WIKI

Sapo is the Portuguese and Spanish term for a toad.

I believe CAPS is telling us that Kermie is deliberately making things up to confuse us.

 ::MonkeyEek::

BS kermit worked with two presidents brought down one.
NO WAY she is deliberately making things up to confuse us.
 I thinks it's Caps that's confusing us.
I also thinks he's more then one poster. JMO


This is a legit question, because statements like these have really caused me to question the motives of Kermit. What president did he/she bring down? Nixon? I thought it was Deepthroat who just passed away that brought down Nixon.

So Kermit brought down a president. And she/he single handily exposed the "Aruba cover-up". I know Klaas says she never said that but look up her posts, she claimed that here and on BFN. This really makes me think the motivation is about ego and not Natalee. I have seen several references to her taking down a president, is it something that can be substantiated?

Also Jen states that there are rumors floating that Jug knew the Persistence was first about oil, second about Natalee? Wow...is that her theory...whose theory? Just speculation or rumor? Those are some serious accusations imho.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #789 1/1/09 -
Post by: Keepthefaith on January 02, 2009, 04:43:56 PM
Um...that should have read, "The real facts remained covered up"

I need more coffee, I think.

Just got my second cup! ::MonkeyDance:: JUSTICE FOR NATALEE is all this is about.The only Glory this is about is brining Natalee home..... ::MonkeyDance:: ::MonkeyDance::

I agree totally. We all just need to keep our eye on the ball and not get distracted, I think.

 ::MonkeyDance::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #789 1/1/09 -
Post by: KYcat on January 02, 2009, 05:02:03 PM
CAPS SAID

So like a said: in colombia they call those that make information up to confuse the issues of this case a SAPO.

FROM WIKI

Sapo is the Portuguese and Spanish term for a toad.

I believe CAPS is telling us that Kermie is deliberately making things up to confuse us.

 ::MonkeyEek::

BS kermit worked with two presidents brought down one.
NO WAY she is deliberately making things up to confuse us.
 I thinks it's Caps that's confusing us.
I also thinks he's more then one poster. JMO


This is a legit question, because statements like these have really caused me to question the motives of Kermit. What president did he/she bring down? Nixon? I thought it was Deepthroat who just passed away that brought down Nixon.

So Kermit brought down a president. And she/he single handily exposed the "Aruba cover-up". I know Klaas says she never said that but look up her posts, she claimed that here and on BFN. This really makes me think the motivation is about ego and not Natalee. I have seen several references to her taking down a president, is it something that can be substantiated?

Also Jen states that there are rumors floating that Jug knew the Persistence was first about oil, second about Natalee? Wow...is that her theory...whose theory? Just speculation or rumor? Those are some serious accusations imho.

  Natalee Holloway / Natalee Holloway / Re: Natalee Case Discussion #788 12/31/08 -  on: December 31, 2008, 05:40:19 PM 
Quote from: Magnolia on December 31, 2008, 05:34:29 PM
I just don't understand why people like Mum and Lalas & idstlou and
all of the former posters here are so angry.
Anybody who reads all of this information should see the
truth to it.  They are nitpicking at the least little word.

Why are they so mad about it all?


I'll one up you with a question here.........

why are some at that site saying that JUG knew the MAIN goal of the Persistence for that trip was oil related?
Reply 


I don't think Jen was accusing Jug of anything.  She asked a question.  I didn't take it that this was her personal theory.  Has there been people at other sites saying this?  I am not a member elsewhere so I don't know.  Do you?

 


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #789 1/1/09 -
Post by: KYcat on January 02, 2009, 05:06:16 PM
CAPS SAID

So like a said: in colombia they call those that make information up to confuse the issues of this case a SAPO.

FROM WIKI

Sapo is the Portuguese and Spanish term for a toad.

I believe CAPS is telling us that Kermie is deliberately making things up to confuse us.

 ::MonkeyEek::

BS kermit worked with two presidents brought down one.
NO WAY she is deliberately making things up to confuse us.
 I thinks it's Caps that's confusing us.
I also thinks he's more then one poster. JMO


This is a legit question, because statements like these have really caused me to question the motives of Kermit. What president did he/she bring down? Nixon? I thought it was Deepthroat who just passed away that brought down Nixon.

So Kermit brought down a president. And she/he single handily exposed the "Aruba cover-up". I know Klaas says she never said that but look up her posts, she claimed that here and on BFN. This really makes me think the motivation is about ego and not Natalee. I have seen several references to her taking down a president, is it something that can be substantiated?

Also Jen states that there are rumors floating that Jug knew the Persistence was first about oil, second about Natalee? Wow...is that her theory...whose theory? Just speculation or rumor? Those are some serious accusations imho.

  Natalee Holloway / Natalee Holloway / Re: Natalee Case Discussion #788 12/31/08 -  on: December 31, 2008, 05:40:19 PM 
Quote from: Magnolia on December 31, 2008, 05:34:29 PM
I just don't understand why people like Mum and Lalas & idstlou and
all of the former posters here are so angry.
Anybody who reads all of this information should see the
truth to it.  They are nitpicking at the least little word.

Why are they so mad about it all?

This is Jen's quote:

I'll one up you with a question here.........

why are some at that site saying that JUG knew the MAIN goal of the Persistence for that trip was oil related?
Reply 

This is me!

I don't think Jen was accusing Jug of anything.  She asked a question.  I didn't take it that this was her personal theory.  Has there been people at other sites saying this?  I am not a member elsewhere so I don't know.  Do you?

 

Tried to fix my own quote! 

Looks like ldstlou is gone.  Maybe when she comes back, if she does, she can answer my question?!? 



Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #789 1/1/09 -
Post by: KYcat on January 02, 2009, 05:15:28 PM
Just thinking out loud here.


snipped>>>>>>>>>>

It's sarcastic and it's nasty.  If you aren't aware that there are deep friendships in this forum, then I would be honored to tell that there are.  This is a very difficult period of time for everyone at both SM and Freebirds.  People who have stood tigether for years are now standing on opposite sides of a fence.  Please don't make this any more difficult than it already is.  The fire doesn't need fuel in the form of sarcastic comments. 

snipped>>>>>>>>


It seems to me that ldstlou may have been fueling the fire.

 


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #789 1/1/09 -
Post by: Edward on January 02, 2009, 05:18:21 PM
It does not take wisdom to tell the truth.
In this situation It takes integrity to tell the truth, But that does not appear to be part of their Culture. It also appears that the closed eyes and empty memories are driven by some sort of fear of ?... Fear of what is the question.. I think that comes down to a corrupt socialist government both on Aruba and in the Netherlands. Then there is a large Mafia style group of business people who are involved in everything from gambling to prostitution and drugs and they are the primary employer outside of the government.
 Same thing we are headed for.. anyways that is just my opinion.. ::MonkeyWink::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #789 1/1/09 -
Post by: bastibro on January 02, 2009, 05:18:46 PM
CAPS SAID

So like a said: in colombia they call those that make information up to confuse the issues of this case a SAPO.

FROM WIKI

Sapo is the Portuguese and Spanish term for a toad.

I believe CAPS is telling us that Kermie is deliberately making things up to confuse us.

 ::MonkeyEek::

BS kermit worked with two presidents brought down one.
NO WAY she is deliberately making things up to confuse us.
 I thinks it's Caps that's confusing us.
I also thinks he's more then one poster. JMO


This is a legit question, because statements like these have really caused me to question the motives of Kermit. What president did he/she bring down? Nixon? I thought it was Deepthroat who just passed away that brought down Nixon.

So Kermit brought down a president. And she/he single handily exposed the "Aruba cover-up". I know Klaas says she never said that but look up her posts, she claimed that here and on BFN. This really makes me think the motivation is about ego and not Natalee. I have seen several references to her taking down a president, is it something that can be substantiated?

Also Jen states that there are rumors floating that Jug knew the Persistence was first about oil, second about Natalee? Wow...is that her theory...whose theory? Just speculation or rumor? Those are some serious accusations imho.

Well, in my opinion she brought down Clinton, must be Monica Lewinsky  ::MonkeyDance::::MonkeyLaugh:: ::cartwheel::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #789 1/1/09 -
Post by: Blue Moon on January 02, 2009, 05:22:48 PM
CAPS SAID

So like a said: in colombia they call those that make information up to confuse the issues of this case a SAPO.

FROM WIKI

Sapo is the Portuguese and Spanish term for a toad.

I believe CAPS is telling us that Kermie is deliberately making things up to confuse us.

 ::MonkeyEek::

BS kermit worked with two presidents brought down one.
NO WAY she is deliberately making things up to confuse us.
 I thinks it's Caps that's confusing us.
I also thinks he's more then one poster. JMO


This is a legit question, because statements like these have really caused me to question the motives of Kermit. What president did he/she bring down? Nixon? I thought it was Deepthroat who just passed away that brought down Nixon.

So Kermit brought down a president. And she/he single handily exposed the "Aruba cover-up". I know Klaas says she never said that but look up her posts, she claimed that here and on BFN. This really makes me think the motivation is about ego and not Natalee. I have seen several references to her taking down a president, is it something that can be substantiated?

Also Jen states that there are rumors floating that Jug knew the Persistence was first about oil, second about Natalee? Wow...is that her theory...whose theory? Just speculation or rumor? Those are some serious accusations imho.

Well, in my opinion she brought down Clinton, must be Monica Lewinsky  ::MonkeyDance::::MonkeyLaugh:: ::cartwheel::

You thought of one I hadn't.   ::MonkeyLaugh:: ::MonkeyLaugh:: ::MonkeyLaugh:: ::MonkeyLaugh::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #789 1/1/09 -
Post by: hotping on January 02, 2009, 05:30:57 PM
Well, how much "wisdom" is required just to tell the truth?

All we have asked Aruba for is an accounting of our citizen.  We have every right to do this and expect an honest and factual reply. 

To date, we have never received anything even close to being believable.

You have to remember the lies you tell but you don't have to remember the truth because the truth is always there.
Ain't that the truth!  ::MonkeyHaHa:: ::MonkeyWink::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #789 1/1/09 -
Post by: Tamikosmom on January 02, 2009, 05:35:41 PM
Mum ... back in May, 2008 ... you and I were on the same page in regards to CAPS ... the same page I have been on since CAPS made his initial appearance in the middle of January, 2008.

Somewhere along the line you jumped back on the CAPS bandwagon.  What changed?  It was not CAPS who changed.

Sincerely, Janet

+++++++

MumInOhio
Re: SHANGO/SIMIAN - who are they and what did they know? #3
« Reply #1412 on: May 06, 2008, 01:59:31 PM »


SS...I have read that as well...I have also read where he said it was other apartments, Dutch owned and not the Matty apartments. I am not going to go back to the first thread and find Cap's posts as I questioned him more than a couple of times as to why he changed his mind and he never answered!

He also didn't respond as to why he told me no to the Ind/Lion's Den in the first thread.

All that being said...he hasn't backed up his posts...just because Caps said it, doesn't make it so!

 I am sorry I don't mean to upset you, but you can post Caps posts forever and I will just keep telling you what he said previously.

I still want to know why he changed from the other apartments to the Matty and he will not answer!!!!!

http://scaredmonkeys.net/index.php?topic=2787.msg379364#msg379364


MumInOhio
Re: SHANGO/SIMIAN - who are they and what did they know? #3
« Reply #1424 on: May 06, 2008, 02:41:59 PM »


SS…let me ask you one question…

If I post the Freddy Zedan owns the Indo/Lion’s Den are you going to just take my word for it?

 Caps posts that the Kalpoes - the father or the stepfather, he never did answer which one, according to a girl there, now own it!

You can certainly take what Caps says without questions, but I will not. So please do not repost Caps post to me....Show me the proof!

 I have read everyone of Cap’s post at least three times…each day I type out an index…you would be very surprised what you see on the third read.

All I am trying to say is what you are posting from Caps is not what he said in January!

I am 99% sure as to why he switched to the Indo apartments…the answer is in one of your last few posts…and I will leave it at that!

And yes Lala’s…I am extremely frustrated…seems we have involved just about everyone on Aruba…new names are dropped every week.…I never see Joran’s name in this thread anymore!!!!!

And everytime Caps appears we have more questions!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

COLUMBO has a word for that!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

http://scaredmonkeys.net/index.php?topic=2787.msg379383#msg379383


MumInOhio
Re: SHANGO/SIMIAN - who are they and what did they know? #3
« Reply #1440 on: May 06, 2008, 06:42:17 PM »


Guess we will have to agree to disagree. I don't have to give him the benefit of the doubt just because he's Caps

All I see is a whole lot of new names and misinformation and very few facts...Giovanni, Deutekom, Bulo, Freddy that doesn't exist, odd-bods living at the kalpoes address, list of names that don't match the phone book...
 
Yes, something is going on at that pond, and we are still dealing with Aruba. I'm in total agreement with Lala's on this one, nothing will come of the pond.

http://scaredmonkeys.net/index.php?topic=2787.msg379502#msg379502


MumInOhio
Re: SHANGO/SIMIAN - who are they and what did they know? #3
« Reply #1450 on: May 06, 2008, 07:32:02 PM »


SS...A simple question as to if Deutekom was a Judge should have been answered 150 pages ago....so should the reason for him going back to the Indo/Lion's Den after he told me no to there. these are simple questions and both merit an answer!

I can't buy Cap's Dirty Hand Deutekom, because how he got to him was flawed. If he is not a Judge he wouldn't have been on that list. It is as simple as that!

There are more questions now than when Caps first started posting!

http://scaredmonkeys.net/index.php?topic=2787.msg379518#msg379518


MumInOhio
Re: SHANGO/SIMIAN - who are they and what did they know? #3
« Reply #1456 on: May 06, 2008, 11:11:21 PM »


Well I guess we are all frustrated today!

I attempted to explain to Caps at least 3 times the Judges list, and as one who tries to answer other poster’s questions, and acknowledge their posts I expected an answer on at least one of those occasions! If you have read my posts you would know that I have acknowledged that Deutekom may be a ‘Dirty Hand’ , just questioning the way he got there.

You can check my posts for this morning and see that I try to ‘share’ what I know! Have a look and see if my answer to another poster was even acknowledged!

I guess in your opinion it is OK for Caps to fire of all these questions at us, but he is not obligated to answer ours. Most of my questions to him have been about posts he has made and names like Bulo’s that we have never heard of. I have asked very few about things I am researching.

I have not asked any more from Caps than I would have asked from any other poster…back up your posts! BS on putting him in any sort of position! Not to the questions I have asked anyways.

Yes there are other theories on this thread, and I for one am sick and tired of having only one jammed down my throat.

I have read Caps posts many times and it is up to me if I go along with everything or anything he says.  Maybe it might help some if you let Caps know that it is creating problems by him dropping names with no other info….it would help a lot and certainly save some of us a lot of time….

JMHO

http://scaredmonkeys.net/index.php?topic=2787.msg379582#msg379582


MumInOhio
Re: SHANGO/SIMIAN - who are they and what did they know? #3
« Reply #1459 on: May 06, 2008, 11:33:41 PM »


*******…as you said this is a discussion forum and I have reason to question things in Caps posts! Most times when I have done so I do not receive an answer or if I do it is the post of Caps I am referring to posted back to me. Sorry … to me that is not discussion.

http://scaredmonkeys.net/index.php?topic=2787.msg379591#msg379591


MumInOhio
Re: SHANGO/SIMIAN - who are they and what did they know? #3
« Reply #1467 on: May 07, 2008, 08:06:50 AM »


SS...Caps started posting in the NAH thread around mid-January. Klaas explained at the time that he had been posting on the front page previously. After 4 or 5 days Caps started posting in the Shango thread. This would have been way back in the first thread.

http://scaredmonkeys.net/index.php?topic=2787.msg379694#msg379694


MumInOhio
Re: SHANGO/SIMIAN - who are they and what did they know? #3
« Reply #1468 on: May 07, 2008, 09:28:28 AM »


SS… You are right. I think Caps has information that has nothing to do with Shango as well. Caps does know the corruption and the ‘dark’ side of Aruba. He knows some of the players, probably a lot.

When Caps first started posting in the forum he knew very little about the case, or so it appears from his early posts. He asked us about the family, the friends, the private plane and the pimps. He asked about the suspects and about the people such as Julia and others that continually misinformed us. He needed our help and knowledge with these pieces of the puzzle. There is nothing wrong with that, I personally have spent a lot of time and posts sharing any information I had or could find.

A lot of time it seems to me that Caps has a piece that he feels fits into a Shango/Simian/Merian post, and just makes it fit. He has the player, the corrupt official, so that is the answer to that part of the riddle.

An example of this would be ‘the yellowhammer’. We started with a yellow hummer way back in the first thread, and most disagreed back then. When it was revisited recently and many posted that they thought it was the bird, Caps said OK, we’ll go with the bird, we’ll refine and correct any errors in his interpretations. The next day, Caps posts that he doesn’t think it is the bird. Our interpretation of ‘the yellowhammer’ doesn’t fit into Cap’s deciphering of the riddle.

I find this very frustrating. To me it is not that difficult.

Thanks everyone for the input on Bulo yesterday. Pita sorry for the confusion I may have caused on the Benz site. Somehow I confused myself…Vms…sounds like a good idea…maybe clear up some loose ends like Giovanni and Bulo…

 I think I need to go and sit in the grandstand with Lala’s and the other grannies for a day or two and go back to my own research.

http://scaredmonkeys.net/index.php?topic=2787.msg379700#msg379700


MumInOhio
Re: SHANGO/SIMIAN - who are they and what did they know? #3
« Reply #1493 on: May 08, 2008, 09:33:46 AM
»

This is a previous discussion about Ben VocKing. Below are 2 of Caps older posts regarding VocKing. So in February and March Caps knew who VocKing was, but not on April 25th.

Somewhere back around page 40 Caps posted a key in which he includes a pic of VocKing. You will notice that Caps refers to a picture of Voking in his response above.

Around pages 45 and 46 there is much discussion about the photo of VocKing and which is the correct one. The photo of VocKing that Caps included in his key and showed to the man who knew him very well is not of the person we determined to be VocKing.

This is why I ask questions…

<snipped>

http://scaredmonkeys.net/index.php?topic=2787.msg379920#msg379920


MumInOhio
Re: SHANGO/SIMIAN - who are they and what did they know? #3
« Reply #1494 on: May 08, 2008, 09:41:12 AM »


These posts of Caps have been etched in mind since March. Another reason I ask questions.

<snipped>

http://scaredmonkeys.net/index.php?topic=2787.msg379922#msg379922


MumInOhio
Re: SHANGO/SIMIAN - who are they and what did they know? #3
« Reply #1495 on: May 08, 2008, 10:12:11 AM »


Here is Cap's picture of Vocking.

Hotping...Thanks for the prayer. After the posts from last night, for the sake of harmony I have decided to refrain from posting in this thread any more.

Enjoy the Tango!

http://scaredmonkeys.net/index.php?topic=2787.msg379926#msg379926


MumInOhio
Re: SHANGO/SIMIAN - who are they and what did they know? #3
« Reply #1500 on: May 08, 2008, 11:55:52 AM »


Vms…I have suspected from very early on from Cap’s posts who Caps really is. I did not come to this conclusion from any mailing list from ‘our friend in Aruba’. Posts over the last 24 hours have confirmed my suspicions. Not everyone is whom they appear to be…I need to walk away!

http://scaredmonkeys.net/index.php?topic=2787.msg379938#msg379938


MumInOhio
Re: Natalee Case Discussion #750 5/2 -
« Reply #936 on: May 08, 2008, 08:30:49 PM »


SS…since you bought this over from the Shango thread….there is no group attack on Caps. I have asked him to answer questions about his posts. He has not done so, on most occasions IMO. I said this morning that I would walk away. I have.

Many of my questions regarding Caps surround Ben Vocking. I posted on that this morning. Please go back and read from page 39 to page 46 of the thread. Open the links. Read Caps response very carefully and then read what I posted this morning.

I am not going to respond any further on the subject.

http://scaredmonkeys.net/index.php?topic=2819.msg380072#msg380072


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #789 1/1/09 -
Post by: wreck on January 02, 2009, 05:37:02 PM
MumInOhio

I would appreciate it if you would go back to your little group and get your facts straight.

It was NOT ME who first posted the photo of the CMB bank next to Digicel.

The reason I know this is because I posted that photo at FREEBIRDS!

IT WAS DAYHIKER who took the photo from Freebirds and posted it here at SM[/b]

In addition:
If you are confused by truth, then you need to sit down and have it out with your group.
BECAUSE if you HAD, you would have known that it was me that was asked to BY THOSE
SPECIFIC members of your group to FIND OUT INFORMATION ON CAPS!

I do not recall posting Montanja 10.
If I did, please give me the link to my post.

I do recall posting Catrini 7.
Lalasmom, your group member not only continued to query me about it, but also emailed me asking me
why I posted it because it was near where CAPS lived! Which differed from the address that CAPS gave
to DAVE and the FBI!

Want me to post the email? I will be more then happy to do so.


Call it drive-bys or untruth or whatever word you want to come up with.

I DID THAT - FOR THEM

If you think for one minute that I can not back up and show the emails to prove what I am saying
 IS THE TRUTH - you are sorely mistaken.

Call me whatever names, insinuate whatever you want, but I have the proof.

Now, go find yourself someone else to slander.


Do not bother responding to me.
Do not bother apologizing to me.
You are forgiven.
But I won't respond to you ever again.





Kermit...

Excuse me...I am slandering You?

I questioned your posts. This is what I do. I ask questions. I want the details straight.  I questioned that address the very next morning after you first posted it in Shango.


Because I respected you and your posts I spent a lot of time and effort looking for a  connection to Freddy Zedan and 7A Catiri. I actually believed you when you posted that Frederick Arends was Freddy Zedan's father. Even after I found a social site for Frederick and his young son. I am sorry, but I do not recall what it was that made me change my mind and realize that what you had posted was incorrect.


You can be sure that I will ask Lalas about 7A Catiri. I will ask because I want the truth.


From your post this is what I see, please correct me if I am wrong...
 

You posted and reposted incorrect information at the request of another member of this Forum. Even though you knew this was incorrect information, you kept posting this address as belonging to Freddy Zedan.

Would you care to elaborate as to why you posted that Frederick Arends was Freddy Zedan's father.

Would you mind clarifying for myself and the others on this Forum how many times you have done this? This being posting incorrect information at the request of another Forum member.


Somehow, I do not think it is me that needs to be forgiven, Kermit.

And I do not think I am the one that needs to be making any apologies either.


Mum has an Agenda - Justice For Natalee
Is that the best you can do? Kermit may have given an incorrect address??


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #789 1/1/09 -
Post by: Ree on January 02, 2009, 05:37:16 PM
CAPS SAID

So like a said: in colombia they call those that make information up to confuse the issues of this case a SAPO.

FROM WIKI

Sapo is the Portuguese and Spanish term for a toad.

I believe CAPS is telling us that Kermie is deliberately making things up to confuse us.

 ::MonkeyEek::

BS kermit worked with two presidents brought down one.
NO WAY she is deliberately making things up to confuse us.
 I thinks it's Caps that's confusing us.
I also thinks he's more then one poster. JMO


This is a legit question, because statements like these have really caused me to question the motives of Kermit. What president did he/she bring down? Nixon? I thought it was Deepthroat who just passed away that brought down Nixon.

So Kermit brought down a president. And she/he single handily exposed the "Aruba cover-up". I know Klaas says she never said that but look up her posts, she claimed that here and on BFN. This really makes me think the motivation is about ego and not Natalee. I have seen several references to her taking down a president, is it something that can be substantiated?

Also Jen states that there are rumors floating that Jug knew the Persistence was first about oil, second about Natalee? Wow...is that her theory...whose theory? Just speculation or rumor? Those are some serious accusations imho.

I find your questioning of both these comments to be nitpicking statements.  Since the information relating to the topic here was backed up, the other is irrelevant.

If you read all of Jen's post, you'd have your answer, especially since you have a direct line to those involved in posting at that site.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #789 1/1/09 -
Post by: Keepthefaith on January 02, 2009, 05:44:52 PM
Some Monkey's are so Organized(Janet)... ::MonkeyDance:: ::MonkeyDance::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #789 1/1/09 -
Post by: Keepthefaith on January 02, 2009, 05:46:37 PM
Some Monkey's are so Organized(Janet)... ::MonkeyDance:: ::MonkeyDance::

JUSTICE FOR NATALEE.ALL THE GLORY IS IN BRINGING NATALEE HOME.

 ::MonkeyDance:: ::cartwheel:: ::MonkeyDance:: ::cartwheel::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #789 1/1/09 -
Post by: Nut44x4 on January 02, 2009, 05:52:45 PM
CAPS SAID

So like a said: in colombia they call those that make information up to confuse the issues of this case a SAPO.

FROM WIKI

Sapo is the Portuguese and Spanish term for a toad.

I believe CAPS is telling us that Kermie is deliberately making things up to confuse us.

 ::MonkeyEek::

BS kermit worked with two presidents brought down one.
NO WAY she is deliberately making things up to confuse us.
 I thinks it's Caps that's confusing us.
I also thinks he's more then one poster. JMO


I stand with the Blonde  :smurfin: and the (http://bestsmileys.com/animals/5.gif)


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #789 1/1/09 -
Post by: ldstlou on January 02, 2009, 05:52:47 PM
CAPS SAID

So like a said: in colombia they call those that make information up to confuse the issues of this case a SAPO.

FROM WIKI

Sapo is the Portuguese and Spanish term for a toad.

I believe CAPS is telling us that Kermie is deliberately making things up to confuse us.

 ::MonkeyEek::

BS kermit worked with two presidents brought down one.
NO WAY she is deliberately making things up to confuse us.
 I thinks it's Caps that's confusing us.
I also thinks he's more then one poster. JMO


This is a legit question, because statements like these have really caused me to question the motives of Kermit. What president did he/she bring down? Nixon? I thought it was Deepthroat who just passed away that brought down Nixon.

So Kermit brought down a president. And she/he single handily exposed the "Aruba cover-up". I know Klaas says she never said that but look up her posts, she claimed that here and on BFN. This really makes me think the motivation is about ego and not Natalee. I have seen several references to her taking down a president, is it something that can be substantiated?

Also Jen states that there are rumors floating that Jug knew the Persistence was first about oil, second about Natalee? Wow...is that her theory...whose theory? Just speculation or rumor? Those are some serious accusations imho.

I find your questioning of both these comments to be nitpicking statements.  Since the information relating to the topic here was backed up, the other is irrelevant.

If you read all of Jen's post, you'd have your answer, especially since you have a direct line to those involved in posting at that site.

ok...once again...I have no other connection to some "other" site and don't even know the site you are referring to.

Why am I stirring a pot...this is in reference to another comment. It appears to me that kermit has a lot of credibility with some posters. It also appears to me part of the credibility stems from her taking down a president and working beside 2 other presidents. The only president I know that came close to being taken down was Nixon...didn't know we were taking about the Monica Lewinsky business.

I also simply asked where the statements that Jug knew the Persistence was oil first and Natalee second came from. If I knew...I would not have asked.

You all know where I stand with what Kermit has done, I disagree and I think it is harmful and disresectful I have stated that all along. No "agenda" other than my own personal sense of right and wrong. I have also stated that I think the motivation...and again this is my opinion...behind bringing over posts made by Kyle...is more about ego than justice...again..my own opinion. But so many keep talking about how credible kermit is and how she has served beside presidents and even took one down. I simply asked if the rest of us who doubt her motivations can be filled in.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #789 1/1/09 -
Post by: bastibro on January 02, 2009, 05:57:23 PM
(http://i272.photobucket.com/albums/jj176/bastibro/Natalee/truthandjusticefornatalee.jpg)


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #789 1/1/09 -
Post by: Kermit on January 02, 2009, 05:57:57 PM
CAPS SAID

So like a said: in colombia they call those that make information up to confuse the issues of this case a SAPO.

FROM WIKI

Sapo is the Portuguese and Spanish term for a toad.

I believe CAPS is telling us that Kermie is deliberately making things up to confuse us.

 ::MonkeyEek::

BS kermit worked with two presidents brought down one.
NO WAY she is deliberately making things up to confuse us.
 I thinks it's Caps that's confusing us.
I also thinks he's more then one poster. JMO


I stand with the Blonde  :smurfin: and the (http://bestsmileys.com/animals/5.gif)

Thank you Blonde and Nut.



Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #789 1/1/09 -
Post by: Anna on January 02, 2009, 05:58:49 PM
Posts and posters rise and fall on the credibility of their posting only.  I don't believe that personal biographical information about a particular poster is necessary for people to determine the validity of what they post.

That said, isn't posting personal information about other posters against the forum rules?



Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #789 1/1/09 -
Post by: wreck on January 02, 2009, 05:59:31 PM
CAPS SAID

So like a said: in colombia they call those that make information up to confuse the issues of this case a SAPO.

FROM WIKI

Sapo is the Portuguese and Spanish term for a toad.

I believe CAPS is telling us that Kermie is deliberately making things up to confuse us.

 ::MonkeyEek::

BS kermit worked with two presidents brought down one.
NO WAY she is deliberately making things up to confuse us.
 I thinks it's Caps that's confusing us.
I also thinks he's more then one poster. JMO


This is a legit question, because statements like these have really caused me to question the motives of Kermit. What president did he/she bring down? Nixon? I thought it was Deepthroat who just passed away that brought down Nixon.

So Kermit brought down a president. And she/he single handily exposed the "Aruba cover-up". I know Klaas says she never said that but look up her posts, she claimed that here and on BFN. This really makes me think the motivation is about ego and not Natalee. I have seen several references to her taking down a president, is it something that can be substantiated?

Also Jen states that there are rumors floating that Jug knew the Persistence was first about oil, second about Natalee? Wow...is that her theory...whose theory? Just speculation or rumor? Those are some serious accusations imho.

I find your questioning of both these comments to be nitpicking statements.  Since the information relating to the topic here was backed up, the other is irrelevant.

If you read all of Jen's post, you'd have your answer, especially since you have a direct line to those involved in posting at that site.

ok...once again...I have no other connection to some "other" site and don't even know the site you are referring to.

Why am I stirring a pot...this is in reference to another comment. It appears to me that kermit has a lot of credibility with some posters. It also appears to me part of the credibility stems from her taking down a president and working beside 2 other presidents. The only president I know that came close to being taken down was Nixon...didn't know we were taking about the Monica Lewinsky business.

I also simply asked where the statements that Jug knew the Persistence was oil first and Natalee second came from. If I knew...I would not have asked.

You all know where I stand with what Kermit has done, I disagree and I think it is harmful and disresectful I have stated that all along. No "agenda" other than my own personal sense of right and wrong. I have also stated that I think the motivation...and again this is my opinion...behind bringing over posts made by Kyle...is more about ego than justice...again..my own opinion. But so many keep talking about how credible kermit is and how she has served beside presidents and even took one down. I simply asked if the rest of us who doubt her motivations can be filled in.
So, you don't believe she was ex-Secret Service?


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #789 1/1/09 -
Post by: Tamikosmom on January 02, 2009, 06:00:56 PM
Caps was deception personified from the getgo.  His posts give the indication that he did not have a grasp of the English languages.  However ... other posts implied just the contrary.

Janet

+++++++


JANUARY, 2008

CapsLockWizard
Re: Natalee Case Discussion #715 1/25 -
« Reply #384 on: January 27, 2008, 02:51:39 PM »


need to know 2 things

Did Natalee travel somewhere before he come to Aruba

and

and the parents tree   Natalee is the doughter of  -----  and --------- etc.

I know that probably Dave Holloway has notting to do with this Case but the Twitty

Wat is twitty to natalee?

http://scaredmonkeys.net/index.php?topic=2539.msg332978;topicseen#msg332978


MARCH 31, 2008

CapsLockWizard
Re: SHANGO/SIMIAN - who are they and what did they know? #2
« Reply #419 on: March 31, 2008, 03:45:31 PM »


To all that believe that the FBI did notting and believe that they have the resource to work on this.

Shango start posting in June 2005 and in June 2008 it will 3 years and that was a lot of time to solve this.

How do I came here is that I wrote a logic report bases on the information that I have that prove where they could have drop the body. I did not know that this Shango or
Simian existed.

Only this I ask was in the front page of SM in December 2007 was the email of David or Beth to sent them my report.

And that how I got here after Klaasend read the report. I took a look at the Simian and could read it. I could see patterns in it. and so I came about to interpret this simian post. Shango was more complex and after my 4 week of separating the layers , the patterns were about the Ritz and Merge with the Natalee case.

The some key were easy but some key's were complex.

and so I took it upon me to solve this with the help of some that can provide or lookup the information.

and so today we are almost done. The three mayor keys are solved and now there is a mayor key only left and that is the News.

in time all will be public...but in the right form and ethics.

http://scaredmonkeys.net/index.php?topic=2733.400


APRIL 1, 2008

CapsLockWizard
Re: SHANGO/SIMIAN - who are they and what did they know? #2
« Reply #609 on: April 01, 2008, 03:15:49 AM »


my first question this morning around 9:30 was:

Why would beth lie about her being a virgin and who run with the story was fox news. where did they got the news from? I will answer Julia.

Why why would I lhype up something that was not true and now i need some one to run with it. that can colorabrorate and sustain my lie. My friend. who walk with me. both know it is not the true and that makes it like we say in Logic world,  NOT = NOT and that makes it a logic sense.

it can not be OR and can not be AND OR logic. do not compute.

http://scaredmonkeys.net/index.php?topic=2733.msg369749#msg369749



Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #789 1/1/09 -
Post by: KYcat on January 02, 2009, 06:00:57 PM
ldstlou,

part of your earlier quote:

Also Jen states that there are rumors floating that Jug knew the Persistence was first about oil, second about Natalee? Wow...is that her theory...whose theory? Just speculation or rumor? Those are some serious accusations imho.

part of your latest quote:

I also simply asked where the statements that Jug knew the Persistence was oil first and Natalee second came from. If I knew...I would not have asked.


This does not sound like you "simply asked".  You said "those are some serious accusations".  You were calling Kermit and Jen out.  I was blasted earlier because I was accused of fueling the fire.  What do you call what you are doing?




Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #789 1/1/09 -
Post by: Kermit on January 02, 2009, 06:01:08 PM
CAPS SAID

So like a said: in colombia they call those that make information up to confuse the issues of this case a SAPO.

FROM WIKI

Sapo is the Portuguese and Spanish term for a toad.

I believe CAPS is telling us that Kermie is deliberately making things up to confuse us.

 ::MonkeyEek::

BS kermit worked with two presidents brought down one.
NO WAY she is deliberately making things up to confuse us.
 I thinks it's Caps that's confusing us.
I also thinks he's more then one poster. JMO


This is a legit question, because statements like these have really caused me to question the motives of Kermit. What president did he/she bring down? Nixon? I thought it was Deepthroat who just passed away that brought down Nixon.

So Kermit brought down a president. And she/he single handily exposed the "Aruba cover-up". I know Klaas says she never said that but look up her posts, she claimed that here and on BFN. This really makes me think the motivation is about ego and not Natalee. I have seen several references to her taking down a president, is it something that can be substantiated?

Also Jen states that there are rumors floating that Jug knew the Persistence was first about oil, second about Natalee? Wow...is that her theory...whose theory? Just speculation or rumor? Those are some serious accusations imho.

I find your questioning of both these comments to be nitpicking statements.  Since the information relating to the topic here was backed up, the other is irrelevant.

If you read all of Jen's post, you'd have your answer, especially since you have a direct line to those involved in posting at that site.

ok...once again...I have no other connection to some "other" site and don't even know the site you are referring to.

Why am I stirring a pot...this is in reference to another comment. It appears to me that kermit has a lot of credibility with some posters. It also appears to me part of the credibility stems from her taking down a president and working beside 2 other presidents. The only president I know that came close to being taken down was Nixon...didn't know we were taking about the Monica Lewinsky business.

I also simply asked where the statements that Jug knew the Persistence was oil first and Natalee second came from. If I knew...I would not have asked.

You all know where I stand with what Kermit has done, I disagree and I think it is harmful and disresectful I have stated that all along. No "agenda" other than my own personal sense of right and wrong. I have also stated that I think the motivation...and again this is my opinion...behind bringing over posts made by Kyle...is more about ego than justice...again..my own opinion. But so many keep talking about how credible kermit is and how she has served beside presidents and even took one down. I simply asked if the rest of us who doubt her motivations can be filled in.

Yes Idstlou, yes I know all about what you think you know.

These are my own personal photos.




(http://img511.imageshack.us/img511/4299/meandwillatrncab3.jpg)


(http://img511.imageshack.us/img511/9073/presidentclintonandkermee0.jpg)




Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #789 1/1/09 -
Post by: KYcat on January 02, 2009, 06:06:17 PM
Dawg gone, ole' Billy B looks pretty good in this pic!


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #789 1/1/09 -
Post by: Blue Moon on January 02, 2009, 06:07:04 PM
CAPS SAID

So like a said: in colombia they call those that make information up to confuse the issues of this case a SAPO.

FROM WIKI

Sapo is the Portuguese and Spanish term for a toad.

I believe CAPS is telling us that Kermie is deliberately making things up to confuse us.

 ::MonkeyEek::

BS kermit worked with two presidents brought down one.
NO WAY she is deliberately making things up to confuse us.
 I thinks it's Caps that's confusing us.
I also thinks he's more then one poster. JMO


This is a legit question, because statements like these have really caused me to question the motives of Kermit. What president did he/she bring down? Nixon? I thought it was Deepthroat who just passed away that brought down Nixon.

So Kermit brought down a president. And she/he single handily exposed the "Aruba cover-up". I know Klaas says she never said that but look up her posts, she claimed that here and on BFN. This really makes me think the motivation is about ego and not Natalee. I have seen several references to her taking down a president, is it something that can be substantiated?

Also Jen states that there are rumors floating that Jug knew the Persistence was first about oil, second about Natalee? Wow...is that her theory...whose theory? Just speculation or rumor? Those are some serious accusations imho.

I find your questioning of both these comments to be nitpicking statements.  Since the information relating to the topic here was backed up, the other is irrelevant.

If you read all of Jen's post, you'd have your answer, especially since you have a direct line to those involved in posting at that site.

ok...once again...I have no other connection to some "other" site and don't even know the site you are referring to.

Why am I stirring a pot...this is in reference to another comment. It appears to me that kermit has a lot of credibility with some posters. It also appears to me part of the credibility stems from her taking down a president and working beside 2 other presidents. The only president I know that came close to being taken down was Nixon...didn't know we were taking about the Monica Lewinsky business.

I also simply asked where the statements that Jug knew the Persistence was oil first and Natalee second came from. If I knew...I would not have asked.

You all know where I stand with what Kermit has done, I disagree and I think it is harmful and disresectful I have stated that all along. No "agenda" other than my own personal sense of right and wrong. I have also stated that I think the motivation...and again this is my opinion...behind bringing over posts made by Kyle...is more about ego than justice...again..my own opinion. But so many keep talking about how credible kermit is and how she has served beside presidents and even took one down. I simply asked if the rest of us who doubt her motivations can be filled in.

Yes Idstlou, yes I know all about what you think you know.

These are my own personal photos.




(http://img511.imageshack.us/img511/4299/meandwillatrncab3.jpg)


(http://img511.imageshack.us/img511/9073/presidentclintonandkermee0.jpg)




Nice pictures Kermit.  (by the way, have I told you I stand with the Frog lately?)


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #789 1/1/09 -
Post by: Anna on January 02, 2009, 06:07:50 PM
I could swear I asked that same question just this morning and received not one but three answers.  I remember this because I sometimes get no answers so this was a first!

Of course, I did take a nap since then so I could just be confused.

 ::MonkeyShocked::



Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #789 1/1/09 -
Post by: KYcat on January 02, 2009, 06:09:17 PM
I could swear I asked that same question just this morning and received not one but three answers.  I remember this because I sometimes get no answers so this was a first!

Of course, I did take a nap since then so I could just be confused.

 ::MonkeyShocked::



Okay, I'll bite............. what question?

 ::MonkeyEek::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #789 1/1/09 -
Post by: ldstlou on January 02, 2009, 06:10:22 PM
CAPS SAID

So like a said: in colombia they call those that make information up to confuse the issues of this case a SAPO.

FROM WIKI

Sapo is the Portuguese and Spanish term for a toad.

I believe CAPS is telling us that Kermie is deliberately making things up to confuse us.

 ::MonkeyEek::

BS kermit worked with two presidents brought down one.
NO WAY she is deliberately making things up to confuse us.
 I thinks it's Caps that's confusing us.
I also thinks he's more then one poster. JMO


This is a legit question, because statements like these have really caused me to question the motives of Kermit. What president did he/she bring down? Nixon? I thought it was Deepthroat who just passed away that brought down Nixon.

So Kermit brought down a president. And she/he single handily exposed the "Aruba cover-up". I know Klaas says she never said that but look up her posts, she claimed that here and on BFN. This really makes me think the motivation is about ego and not Natalee. I have seen several references to her taking down a president, is it something that can be substantiated?

Also Jen states that there are rumors floating that Jug knew the Persistence was first about oil, second about Natalee? Wow...is that her theory...whose theory? Just speculation or rumor? Those are some serious accusations imho.

I find your questioning of both these comments to be nitpicking statements.  Since the information relating to the topic here was backed up, the other is irrelevant.

If you read all of Jen's post, you'd have your answer, especially since you have a direct line to those involved in posting at that site.

ok...once again...I have no other connection to some "other" site and don't even know the site you are referring to.

Why am I stirring a pot...this is in reference to another comment. It appears to me that kermit has a lot of credibility with some posters. It also appears to me part of the credibility stems from her taking down a president and working beside 2 other presidents. The only president I know that came close to being taken down was Nixon...didn't know we were taking about the Monica Lewinsky business.

I also simply asked where the statements that Jug knew the Persistence was oil first and Natalee second came from. If I knew...I would not have asked.

You all know where I stand with what Kermit has done, I disagree and I think it is harmful and disresectful I have stated that all along. No "agenda" other than my own personal sense of right and wrong. I have also stated that I think the motivation...and again this is my opinion...behind bringing over posts made by Kyle...is more about ego than justice...again..my own opinion. But so many keep talking about how credible kermit is and how she has served beside presidents and even took one down. I simply asked if the rest of us who doubt her motivations can be filled in.
So, you don't believe she was ex-Secret Service?

I had no idea Wreck, thats why I was asking.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #789 1/1/09 -
Post by: klaasend on January 02, 2009, 06:10:43 PM
Posts and posters rise and fall on the credibility of their posting only.  I don't believe that personal biographical information about a particular poster is necessary for people to determine the validity of what they post.

That said, isn't posting personal information about other posters against the forum rules?



Yes.  Sometimes posters volunteer personal information and then of course it's OK.  But otherwise personal information about posters is nobody's business.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #789 1/1/09 -
Post by: KYcat on January 02, 2009, 06:13:03 PM
I could swear I asked that same question just this morning and received not one but three answers.  I remember this because I sometimes get no answers so this was a first!

Of course, I did take a nap since then so I could just be confused.

 ::MonkeyShocked::



Okay, I'll bite............. what question?

 ::MonkeyEek::

Never mind, I know what question.  It seems to be THE question.  It certainly has been answered severl times.   ::MonkeyHaHa::

I would like an answer to my question that I posed to ldstlou.



Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #789 1/1/09 -
Post by: ldstlou on January 02, 2009, 06:13:29 PM
CAPS SAID

So like a said: in colombia they call those that make information up to confuse the issues of this case a SAPO.

FROM WIKI

Sapo is the Portuguese and Spanish term for a toad.

I believe CAPS is telling us that Kermie is deliberately making things up to confuse us.

 ::MonkeyEek::

BS kermit worked with two presidents brought down one.
NO WAY she is deliberately making things up to confuse us.
 I thinks it's Caps that's confusing us.
I also thinks he's more then one poster. JMO


This is a legit question, because statements like these have really caused me to question the motives of Kermit. What president did he/she bring down? Nixon? I thought it was Deepthroat who just passed away that brought down Nixon.

So Kermit brought down a president. And she/he single handily exposed the "Aruba cover-up". I know Klaas says she never said that but look up her posts, she claimed that here and on BFN. This really makes me think the motivation is about ego and not Natalee. I have seen several references to her taking down a president, is it something that can be substantiated?

Also Jen states that there are rumors floating that Jug knew the Persistence was first about oil, second about Natalee? Wow...is that her theory...whose theory? Just speculation or rumor? Those are some serious accusations imho.

I find your questioning of both these comments to be nitpicking statements.  Since the information relating to the topic here was backed up, the other is irrelevant.

If you read all of Jen's post, you'd have your answer, especially since you have a direct line to those involved in posting at that site.

ok...once again...I have no other connection to some "other" site and don't even know the site you are referring to.

Why am I stirring a pot...this is in reference to another comment. It appears to me that kermit has a lot of credibility with some posters. It also appears to me part of the credibility stems from her taking down a president and working beside 2 other presidents. The only president I know that came close to being taken down was Nixon...didn't know we were taking about the Monica Lewinsky business.

I also simply asked where the statements that Jug knew the Persistence was oil first and Natalee second came from. If I knew...I would not have asked.

You all know where I stand with what Kermit has done, I disagree and I think it is harmful and disresectful I have stated that all along. No "agenda" other than my own personal sense of right and wrong. I have also stated that I think the motivation...and again this is my opinion...behind bringing over posts made by Kyle...is more about ego than justice...again..my own opinion. But so many keep talking about how credible kermit is and how she has served beside presidents and even took one down. I simply asked if the rest of us who doubt her motivations can be filled in.

Yes Idstlou, yes I know all about what you think you know.

These are my own personal photos.




(http://img511.imageshack.us/img511/4299/meandwillatrncab3.jpg)


(http://img511.imageshack.us/img511/9073/presidentclintonandkermee0.jpg)




another legit question...so you were secret service...and you "took down" the president you were working for? Can you explain how?


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #789 1/1/09 -
Post by: wreck on January 02, 2009, 06:13:56 PM
Quote
So, you don't believe she was ex-Secret Service
?

Quote
I had no idea Wreck, thats why I was asking
.
That tells me you haven't been actually reading ANYTHING we have tried to explain to you. This was discussed greatly when all of this about Kermit broke. I think you are responding on emotion instead of on careful attention to what has been posted.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #789 1/1/09 -
Post by: ldstlou on January 02, 2009, 06:15:17 PM
Posts and posters rise and fall on the credibility of their posting only.  I don't believe that personal biographical information about a particular poster is necessary for people to determine the validity of what they post.

That said, isn't posting personal information about other posters against the forum rules?



Yes.  Sometimes posters volunteer personal information and then of course it's OK.  But otherwise personal information about posters is nobody's business.

ok...I have seen it posted several times that kermit took down a president, and that has been part of her credibilty for some it seems. Am I then allowed to ask what president and how? jeez.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #789 1/1/09 -
Post by: Kermit on January 02, 2009, 06:16:22 PM
Caps was deception personified from the getgo.  His posts give the indication that he did not have a grasp of the English languages.  However ... other posts implied just the contrary.

Janet

+++++++


JANUARY, 2008

CapsLockWizard
Re: Natalee Case Discussion #715 1/25 -
« Reply #384 on: January 27, 2008, 02:51:39 PM »


need to know 2 things

Did Natalee travel somewhere before he come to Aruba

and

and the parents tree   Natalee is the doughter of  -----  and --------- etc.

I know that probably Dave Holloway has notting to do with this Case but the Twitty

Wat is twitty to natalee?

http://scaredmonkeys.net/index.php?topic=2539.msg332978;topicseen#msg332978


MARCH 31, 2008

CapsLockWizard
Re: SHANGO/SIMIAN - who are they and what did they know? #2
« Reply #419 on: March 31, 2008, 03:45:31 PM »


To all that believe that the FBI did notting and believe that they have the resource to work on this.

Shango start posting in June 2005 and in June 2008 it will 3 years and that was a lot of time to solve this.

How do I came here is that I wrote a logic report bases on the information that I have that prove where they could have drop the body. I did not know that this Shango or
Simian existed.

Only this I ask was in the front page of SM in December 2007 was the email of David or Beth to sent them my report.

And that how I got here after Klaasend read the report. I took a look at the Simian and could read it. I could see patterns in it. and so I came about to interpret this simian post. Shango was more complex and after my 4 week of separating the layers , the patterns were about the Ritz and Merge with the Natalee case.

The some key were easy but some key's were complex.

and so I took it upon me to solve this with the help of some that can provide or lookup the information.

and so today we are almost done. The three mayor keys are solved and now there is a mayor key only left and that is the News.

in time all will be public...but in the right form and ethics.

http://scaredmonkeys.net/index.php?topic=2733.400


APRIL 1, 2008

CapsLockWizard
Re: SHANGO/SIMIAN - who are they and what did they know? #2
« Reply #609 on: April 01, 2008, 03:15:49 AM »


my first question this morning around 9:30 was:

Why would beth lie about her being a virgin and who run with the story was fox news. where did they got the news from? I will answer Julia.

Why why would I lhype up something that was not true and now i need some one to run with it. that can colorabrorate and sustain my lie. My friend. who walk with me. both know it is not the true and that makes it like we say in Logic world,  NOT = NOT and that makes it a logic sense.

it can not be OR and can not be AND OR logic. do not compute.

http://scaredmonkeys.net/index.php?topic=2733.msg369749#msg369749



I agree.

In fact CAPS confirmed something today.
CAPS said: "I work alone [b]with a group that can not be put at risk"[/b]

Now, lets refresh our memories, Klassend posted two posts of CAPS and I think several monkeys questioned if it was 2 people, Blonde just posted that too and I agree with you guys.  Janet I recall questioned his posts because his English got better or changed[/b]



Since I can not post the actual proof, I will tell you what Caps emailed to Dave.


On February 10, 2008 10:42:33 PM
Subject: Taking matters in Our oun Hands.

Since January 1st, 2008, Caps tells Dave that he says Natalee was not in the ocean, but in the pond.
He goes on to tell Dave that he has " established a group to retrieve her body.

Then he says he is amazed Dave doesn't returne his emails or phone calls, but he wants Dave to come to Aruba.


Now, start figuring in the cover-up and how this all adds up.









Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #789 1/1/09 -
Post by: ldstlou on January 02, 2009, 06:17:35 PM
Quote
So, you don't believe she was ex-Secret Service
?

Quote
I had no idea Wreck, thats why I was asking
.
That tells me you haven't been actually reading ANYTHING we have tried to explain to you. This was discussed greatly when all of this about Kermit broke. I think you are responding on emotion instead of on careful attention to what has been posted.

I have read she was one person...and then it was just a cover. Some refer to her as a he, some as a she. Some have said she was FBI, some SS. Some have said she has taken down a president. I have been given a lot of conflicting info.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #789 1/1/09 -
Post by: Kermit on January 02, 2009, 06:18:03 PM


another legit question...so you were secret service...and you "took down" the president you were working for? Can you explain how?

No I won't explain it to you because it's not relevant to Bringing Natalee Home.
A picture is worth a thousand words though.



Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #789 1/1/09 -
Post by: klaasend on January 02, 2009, 06:18:59 PM
Posts and posters rise and fall on the credibility of their posting only.  I don't believe that personal biographical information about a particular poster is necessary for people to determine the validity of what they post.

That said, isn't posting personal information about other posters against the forum rules?



Yes.  Sometimes posters volunteer personal information and then of course it's OK.  But otherwise personal information about posters is nobody's business.

ok...I have seen it posted several times that kermit took down a president, and that has been part of her credibilty for some it seems. Am I then allowed to ask what president and how? jeez.

I don't see where I directed my comment to you but I'll respond anyway.  You can ask all you want but it's inappropriate and don't expect an answer.

Personally, whether a person "took down" a president or not makes no difference to me.  It does not change how I feel about Kermit or Caps or anyone else.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #789 1/1/09 -
Post by: Keepthefaith on January 02, 2009, 06:19:40 PM
JUSTICE FOR NATALEE

THE COVER-UP OF HER MURDER

THE PERSISTENCE,THE CAGE AND THE COVER-UP(THE CONTENTS FOR WHICH WE'LL NEVER KNOW)..

STAY FOCUSED MONKEY'S... ::MonkeyDance:: ::MonkeyDance::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #789 1/1/09 -
Post by: Blue Moon on January 02, 2009, 06:20:08 PM
Kermit,

Was the plan by Caps and his "group" (I am assuming the dive team here) to remove the remains from the cage and move them to the pond?  And is Caps the brother of Dirty Hand?


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #789 1/1/09 -
Post by: ldstlou on January 02, 2009, 06:20:38 PM
Caps was deception personified from the getgo.  His posts give the indication that he did not have a grasp of the English languages.  However ... other posts implied just the contrary.

Janet

+++++++


JANUARY, 2008

CapsLockWizard
Re: Natalee Case Discussion #715 1/25 -
« Reply #384 on: January 27, 2008, 02:51:39 PM »


need to know 2 things

Did Natalee travel somewhere before he come to Aruba

and

and the parents tree   Natalee is the doughter of  -----  and --------- etc.

I know that probably Dave Holloway has notting to do with this Case but the Twitty

Wat is twitty to natalee?

http://scaredmonkeys.net/index.php?topic=2539.msg332978;topicseen#msg332978


MARCH 31, 2008

CapsLockWizard
Re: SHANGO/SIMIAN - who are they and what did they know? #2
« Reply #419 on: March 31, 2008, 03:45:31 PM »


To all that believe that the FBI did notting and believe that they have the resource to work on this.

Shango start posting in June 2005 and in June 2008 it will 3 years and that was a lot of time to solve this.

How do I came here is that I wrote a logic report bases on the information that I have that prove where they could have drop the body. I did not know that this Shango or
Simian existed.

Only this I ask was in the front page of SM in December 2007 was the email of David or Beth to sent them my report.

And that how I got here after Klaasend read the report. I took a look at the Simian and could read it. I could see patterns in it. and so I came about to interpret this simian post. Shango was more complex and after my 4 week of separating the layers , the patterns were about the Ritz and Merge with the Natalee case.

The some key were easy but some key's were complex.

and so I took it upon me to solve this with the help of some that can provide or lookup the information.

and so today we are almost done. The three mayor keys are solved and now there is a mayor key only left and that is the News.

in time all will be public...but in the right form and ethics.

http://scaredmonkeys.net/index.php?topic=2733.400


APRIL 1, 2008

CapsLockWizard
Re: SHANGO/SIMIAN - who are they and what did they know? #2
« Reply #609 on: April 01, 2008, 03:15:49 AM »


my first question this morning around 9:30 was:

Why would beth lie about her being a virgin and who run with the story was fox news. where did they got the news from? I will answer Julia.

Why why would I lhype up something that was not true and now i need some one to run with it. that can colorabrorate and sustain my lie. My friend. who walk with me. both know it is not the true and that makes it like we say in Logic world,  NOT = NOT and that makes it a logic sense.

it can not be OR and can not be AND OR logic. do not compute.

http://scaredmonkeys.net/index.php?topic=2733.msg369749#msg369749



I agree.

In fact CAPS confirmed something today.
CAPS said: "I work alone [b]with a group that can not be put at risk"[/b]

Now, lets refresh our memories, Klassend posted two posts of CAPS and I think several monkeys questioned if it was 2 people, Blonde just posted that too and I agree with you guys.  Janet I recall questioned his posts because his English got better or changed[/b]



Since I can not post the actual proof, I will tell you what Caps emailed to Dave.


On February 10, 2008 10:42:33 PM
Subject: Taking matters in Our oun Hands.

Since January 1st, 2008, Caps tells Dave that he says Natalee was not in the ocean, but in the pond.
He goes on to tell Dave that he has " established a group to retrieve her body.

Then he says he is amazed Dave doesn't returne his emails or phone calls, but he wants Dave to come to Aruba.


Now, start figuring in the cover-up and how this all adds up.









See, this is what bothers me, and where kermit loses credibility as far as I am concerned. If you are not allowed to post it, don't post it!!!


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #789 1/1/09 -
Post by: Maggie on January 02, 2009, 06:21:26 PM
Idstlou,
Give it up. IMO your questions about which president and how are none of your business and have nothing to do with Natalee. This nonsense has gone on long enough. Let's get back on topic.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #789 1/1/09 -
Post by: wreck on January 02, 2009, 06:22:05 PM
Quote
So, you don't believe she was ex-Secret Service
?

Quote
I had no idea Wreck, thats why I was asking
.
That tells me you haven't been actually reading ANYTHING we have tried to explain to you. This was discussed greatly when all of this about Kermit broke. I think you are responding on emotion instead of on careful attention to what has been posted.

I have read she was one person...and then it was just a cover. Some refer to her as a he, some as a she. Some have said she was FBI, some SS. Some have said she has taken down a president. I have been given a lot of conflicting info.
All I know/believe is what SHE has stated herself. Kermit never claimed herself to be FBI or a "he" (although most of us assumed she was a male because her forum name is Kermit). Hotshot thought she was only a "reporter".


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #789 1/1/09 -
Post by: ldstlou on January 02, 2009, 06:22:25 PM
Posts and posters rise and fall on the credibility of their posting only.  I don't believe that personal biographical information about a particular poster is necessary for people to determine the validity of what they post.

That said, isn't posting personal information about other posters against the forum rules?



Yes.  Sometimes posters volunteer personal information and then of course it's OK.  But otherwise personal information about posters is nobody's business.

ok...I have seen it posted several times that kermit took down a president, and that has been part of her credibilty for some it seems. Am I then allowed to ask what president and how? jeez.

I don't see where I directed my comment to you but I'll respond anyway.  You can ask all you want but it's inappropriate and don't expect an answer.

Personally, whether a person "took down" a president or not makes no difference to me.  It does not change how I feel about Kermit or Caps or anyone else.

posters keep posting this comment in reference to kermit's credibility. Why can't I ask about it then?


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #789 1/1/09 -
Post by: Tamikosmom on January 02, 2009, 06:23:30 PM

ok...once again...I have no other connection to some "other" site and don't even know the site you are referring to.

Why am I stirring a pot...this is in reference to another comment. It appears to me that kermit has a lot of credibility with some posters. It also appears to me part of the credibility stems from her taking down a president and working beside 2 other presidents. The only president I know that came close to being taken down was Nixon...didn't know we were taking about the Monica Lewinsky business.

I also simply asked where the statements that Jug knew the Persistence was oil first and Natalee second came from. If I knew...I would not have asked.

You all know where I stand with what Kermit has done, I disagree and I think it is harmful and disresectful I have stated that all along. No "agenda" other than my own personal sense of right and wrong. I have also stated that I think the motivation...and again this is my opinion...behind bringing over posts made by Kyle...is more about ego than justice...again..my own opinion. But so many keep talking about how credible kermit is and how she has served beside presidents and even took one down. I simply asked if the rest of us who doubt her motivations can be filled in.

Lou ... Kermit was/is the messenger.

What is your perspective on the source of the message?

My opinion.

When arriving back in the States ... if Kyle Kingman had gone directly to the FBI/family with his concerns/suspicions regarding the Persistence undertaking ... with the second set of ROV images rather than sharing it all on a private forum .... rather than attempting to make deals with major networks ... maybe ... just maybe ... Natalee Holloway's remains could currently be resting on American soil and ... the family could possibly have had had a measure of closure this past Christmas ... the fourth Christmas of not knowing.

Janet

______


KYLE KINGMAN - PRIVATE FORUM

Kyle: I have not given anything to the FBI since the pictures and statements from Dec 29th

Kyle: None of us gave any statements to the authorities after the 29th. It's possible John Silvetti did, because he was the only one conversing with them after Jan 7th.

Kyle: I've talked with Peter Shouten numerous times back in February. He hasn't seen anything but knows about the blue fabrics. DeVries and Endemol was interested in purchasing the ROV footage and I was working between them, ABC, and CBS to strike a deal.

Kyle: In case it isn't clear.. notice the blue denim-like fabric

Kyle: The Aruban divers were on the police boat, dove from their boat, and returned to their boat.

Kyle: They were immediately whisked away by the Aruban police and not seen of again by us on the 7th

Kyle: John stood back and waited and worked with the Aruban Polis

Kyle: John definitely believed the Arubans at their every word

Kyle: John didn't want Tim Miller on board the Persistence because he said Tim wasn't necessary any more and was a liability

Kyle: John told me then he didn't want to hear me ever mention the trap again.

Kyle: Schafer is sue crazy.

Kyle: I did not feel the same and we had a major difference in opinion. He [John Silvetti] was the one who never pressed ALE to be completely open with us with the trap evidence. I would have forced them to. However, John was the one paying my invoices so I was forced to sit back and hope for the best.

Kyle: We all know it wasn't a blouse, but I believe they were sent some piece of fabric other than the fabric found inside the trap.

Kyle: I've talked with Peter Shouten numerous times back in February. He hasn't seen anything but knows about the blue fabrics. DeVries and Endemol was interested in purchasing the ROV footage and I was working between them, ABC, and CBS to strike a deal.

Kyle: Louis is currently working with someone who I do not know to put together some documentary on the case, the way it was handled, and what happened during the search. I learned this from Tim T. yesterday. Louis was sold on the idea that it will make him a lot of money.

Kyle: The portion of the discolored blue fabric was presumably on the bottom of the fabric. In my opinion this discoloration is not another type of fabric, but rather biological staining or discoloration from biological growth caused from a high organic carbon content and decay. Basically, during decay a biological mat will form around the organics from remains. This is what I believe it is on the bottom of the fabric.

Kyle: John Silvetti told me today that he may be returning to Aruba very soon for a few days.

Kyle: I couldn't get the logs from the Persistence. All things "Holloway" were stripped from the boat once it got back to Louisiana

Kyle: He's [John Silvetti] seriously making plans to open an Aruba office so he can conduct business easier in S. America and that would allow him to do that.

Kyle: It was confirmed by the FBI that they received a fabric sample send by Richardson and that it wasn't a match to Natalee's blouse. I think the video can prove or disprove whatever the FBI was sent was the same object or not. I strongly believe it's blue denim. Everyone I show thinks the same thing without being prompted (including senior ABC execs).

Klye: We're being fed misinformation to keep us searching and out of their way while they cover their asses, destroy evidence, cover their tracks, and keep us out at sea and away from the trap.

Kyle: neither Dave, Robin, or Beth has seen any of the ROV footage aside from what was broadcasted on Dateline or the pictures leaked from the FBI to Dave (and Robin H.). Beth has seen nothing in my knowledge.

Kyle: John is not a believer in the trap. He took ALE's word as gospel that it wasn't case related, yet never studied the videos or bothered to inquire further. He had plans on doing business with Aruba and in S. America and he didn't want to hurt any feelings by talks hinting at lack of complete trust and friendship.

Kyle: Notice the end of the skirt is an identical match to the 90 degree angle in the sand. I believe her left arm was outstretched with her legs slightly bent. I did not edit the legs. I believe the tarp was placed over her and tucked around her, or perhaps tied down. I believe there are several rocks laying on the sand which were placed on the tarp, or inside the tarp over her body which explains their unusual location. Either way, the proportions appear promising.

Kyle: I took the proportions of the body form from the head, to shoulder, to a 90 degree angle which I believed to be the hem line of Natalee's skirt. I then took those proportions and matched them to the photo of Natalee with what she was last seen wearing. The proportions matched within an inch from head, to shoulder, to skirt line. Based on this comparison and with what we believed we saw in the Dec 29th video, Tim Miller contacted the family and told them the 99.9% comment. I told Tim not to do anything until we have forensic results back after the site is processed. Jan 7th we sampled the contents and in my opinion we found the skirt under the sand along with the other items The blue fabric was found right where the skirt is pictured. If it isn't her, it will forever haunt me as a major cosmic WTF.

kyle: Richardson was onboard the Persistence several times and attended the meetings on the boat. You may see a glimpse of him on the Dateline video in the survey room along with Mos standing over my shoulder.

Kyle: The bags were removed just after the ROV got out of the way when the divers took the samples to their boat.... and took off

Kyle: We're close to finding the Dirty Hand and a major leak plaguing the investigation. I believe they're linked. I'm assuming Caps isn't deep inside ALE, but do we know that he isn't? We need to figure out who Cap's source is and what he does.  Can we confirm Destiny's source is a Dairio reporter? If so, do we know who this would be? Could it be Eduardo Mansur???

Kyle: THis is what I'm trying to figure out now. I need to know the leak! I believe Caps is only one step away from DirtyHand

Kyle: I need to know what we know about Caps and Destiny. I need their names if possible.

Klye:  I did not give the information to the FBI and I'm unaware of anyone relaying the possibility to them.

Klye: I havn't spoken to Beth and don't plan to personally.


THE ROV IMAGES

Kermit
Re: Natalee Case Discussion #778 11/23/08 -
« Reply #408 on: November 24, 2008, 03:59:08 PM »


http://scaredmonkeys.net/index.php?topic=4173.msg555618#msg555618
 
 
Kermit
Re: Natalee Case Discussion #778 11/23/08 -
« Reply #410 on: November 24, 2008, 04:01:55 PM »


Photos given to the FBI sent to Dave and Robin posted on the internet are NOT the
photos posted above.  These were not given to the FBI until recently.

http://scaredmonkeys.net/index.php?topic=4173.msg555621#msg555621







Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #789 1/1/09 -
Post by: Kermit on January 02, 2009, 06:23:35 PM
Kermit,

Was the plan by Caps and his "group" (I am assuming the dive team here) to remove the remains from the cage and move them to the pond?  And is Caps the brother of Dirty Hand?

I think some of those questions are going to be answered soon.
I don't really want to comment further just now.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #789 1/1/09 -
Post by: ldstlou on January 02, 2009, 06:23:48 PM
Idstlou,
Give it up. IMO your questions about which president and how are none of your business and have nothing to do with Natalee. This nonsense has gone on long enough. Let's get back on topic.

It goes to credibility, and it has been posted over and over again as to kermit's credibility...so why can't I ask?


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #789 1/1/09 -
Post by: Anna on January 02, 2009, 06:23:55 PM
I could swear I asked that same question just this morning and received not one but three answers.  I remember this because I sometimes get no answers so this was a first!

Of course, I did take a nap since then so I could just be confused.

 ::MonkeyShocked::



Okay, I'll bite............. what question?

 ::MonkeyEek::

The one about Jug knowing the primary mission of the Persistence having to do with oil.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #789 1/1/09 -
Post by: Kermit on January 02, 2009, 06:24:38 PM
posters keep posting this comment in reference to kermit's credibility. Why can't I ask about it then?

Briefs or boxers?



Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #789 1/1/09 -
Post by: klaasend on January 02, 2009, 06:25:30 PM
LDSTLOU - if Joran van der Sloot emailed me and confessed to Natalee dying and his disposing of her body, would it bother you if I posted the jest of that email in the forum?  Just so people could have a good idea what was sent to me?  Or would you think it more important to honor a private email and not tell anyone about it?


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #789 1/1/09 -
Post by: KYcat on January 02, 2009, 06:25:41 PM
KLAAS, CAN WE HAVE THE POPCORN KITTY, PLEASE????


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #789 1/1/09 -
Post by: ldstlou on January 02, 2009, 06:28:31 PM
LDSTLOU - if Joran van der Sloot emailed me and confessed to Natalee dying and his disposing of her body, would it bother you if I posted the jest of that email in the forum?  Just so people could have a good idea what was sent to me?  Or would you think it more important to honor a private email and not tell anyone about it?

I don't see that Caps was posting any confession. Kermit says she is not allowed to post it and yet she posts it. And no, if I had an e-mail from Joran confessing I would not post it at SM, I would turn it over to the FBI who I am sure would tell me to keep my mouth shut about it and I would keep my mouth shut about it.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #789 1/1/09 -
Post by: Blue Moon on January 02, 2009, 06:28:36 PM
Kermit,

Was the plan by Caps and his "group" (I am assuming the dive team here) to remove the remains from the cage and move them to the pond?  And is Caps the brother of Dirty Hand?

I think some of those questions are going to be answered soon.
I don't really want to comment further just now.


Thanks.  I think I am getting a picture here anyway.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #789 1/1/09 -
Post by: texasmom on January 02, 2009, 06:29:40 PM
posters keep posting this comment in reference to kermit's credibility. Why can't I ask about it then?

Briefs or boxers?



 ::MonkeyHaHa::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #789 1/1/09 -
Post by: Blue Moon on January 02, 2009, 06:30:00 PM
LDSTLOU - if Joran van der Sloot emailed me and confessed to Natalee dying and his disposing of her body, would it bother you if I posted the jest of that email in the forum?  Just so people could have a good idea what was sent to me?  Or would you think it more important to honor a private email and not tell anyone about it?

I don't see that Caps was posting any confession. Kermit says she is not allowed to post it and yet she posts it. And no, if I had an e-mail from Joran confessing I would not post it at SM, I would turn it over to the FBI who I am sure would tell me to keep my mouth shut about it and I would keep my mouth shut about it.

Which Kyle DID NOT do.  He posted on a private forum his concerns instead of giving the information to the FBI.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #789 1/1/09 -
Post by: Keepthefaith on January 02, 2009, 06:30:22 PM
Kermit,

Was the plan by Caps and his "group" (I am assuming the dive team here) to remove the remains from the cage and move them to the pond?  And is Caps the brother of Dirty Hand?

I think some of those questions are going to be answered soon.
I don't really want to comment further just now.


Thanks.  I think I am getting a picture here anyway.

It's a very sad picture!I must still see where Eduardo and Jossy may play into this.I pray i'm wrong..


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #789 1/1/09 -
Post by: klaasend on January 02, 2009, 06:31:22 PM
KLAAS, CAN WE HAVE THE POPCORN KITTY, PLEASE????

(http://i118.photobucket.com/albums/o100/klaasen3/Sub5/kittycorn-1.gif)


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #789 1/1/09 -
Post by: Patriot on January 02, 2009, 06:31:48 PM
Posts and posters rise and fall on the credibility of their posting only.  I don't believe that personal biographical information about a particular poster is necessary for people to determine the validity of what they post.

That said, isn't posting personal information about other posters against the forum rules?



Yes.  Sometimes posters volunteer personal information and then of course it's OK.  But otherwise personal information about posters is nobody's business.

ok...I have seen it posted several times that kermit took down a president, and that has been part of her credibilty for some it seems. Am I then allowed to ask what president and how? jeez.

I don't see where I directed my comment to you but I'll respond anyway.  You can ask all you want but it's inappropriate and don't expect an answer.

Personally, whether a person "took down" a president or not makes no difference to me.  It does not change how I feel about Kermit or Caps or anyone else.

posters keep posting this comment in reference to kermit's credibility. Why can't I ask about it then?

SHE JUST SHOWED YOU 2 PHOTOS OF HER WORKING FOR PRES CLINTON!! WHAT THE HECK ELSE DO YOU WANT?



Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #789 1/1/09 -
Post by: bastibro on January 02, 2009, 06:32:14 PM
Caps was deception personified from the getgo.  His posts give the indication that he did not have a grasp of the English languages.  However ... other posts implied just the contrary.

Janet

+++++++


JANUARY, 2008

CapsLockWizard
Re: Natalee Case Discussion #715 1/25 -
« Reply #384 on: January 27, 2008, 02:51:39 PM »


need to know 2 things

Did Natalee travel somewhere before he come to Aruba

and

and the parents tree   Natalee is the doughter of  -----  and --------- etc.

I know that probably Dave Holloway has notting to do with this Case but the Twitty

Wat is twitty to natalee?

http://scaredmonkeys.net/index.php?topic=2539.msg332978;topicseen#msg332978


MARCH 31, 2008

CapsLockWizard
Re: SHANGO/SIMIAN - who are they and what did they know? #2
« Reply #419 on: March 31, 2008, 03:45:31 PM »


To all that believe that the FBI did notting and believe that they have the resource to work on this.

Shango start posting in June 2005 and in June 2008 it will 3 years and that was a lot of time to solve this.

How do I came here is that I wrote a logic report bases on the information that I have that prove where they could have drop the body. I did not know that this Shango or
Simian existed.

Only this I ask was in the front page of SM in December 2007 was the email of David or Beth to sent them my report.

And that how I got here after Klaasend read the report. I took a look at the Simian and could read it. I could see patterns in it. and so I came about to interpret this simian post. Shango was more complex and after my 4 week of separating the layers , the patterns were about the Ritz and Merge with the Natalee case.

The some key were easy but some key's were complex.

and so I took it upon me to solve this with the help of some that can provide or lookup the information.

and so today we are almost done. The three mayor keys are solved and now there is a mayor key only left and that is the News.

in time all will be public...but in the right form and ethics.

http://scaredmonkeys.net/index.php?topic=2733.400


APRIL 1, 2008

CapsLockWizard
Re: SHANGO/SIMIAN - who are they and what did they know? #2
« Reply #609 on: April 01, 2008, 03:15:49 AM »


my first question this morning around 9:30 was:

Why would beth lie about her being a virgin and who run with the story was fox news. where did they got the news from? I will answer Julia.

Why why would I lhype up something that was not true and now i need some one to run with it. that can colorabrorate and sustain my lie. My friend. who walk with me. both know it is not the true and that makes it like we say in Logic world,  NOT = NOT and that makes it a logic sense.

it can not be OR and can not be AND OR logic. do not compute.

http://scaredmonkeys.net/index.php?topic=2733.msg369749#msg369749



I agree.

In fact CAPS confirmed something today.
CAPS said: "I work alone [b]with a group that can not be put at risk"[/b]

Now, lets refresh our memories, Klassend posted two posts of CAPS and I think several monkeys questioned if it was 2 people, Blonde just posted that too and I agree with you guys.  Janet I recall questioned his posts because his English got better or changed[/b]



Since I can not post the actual proof, I will tell you what Caps emailed to Dave.


On February 10, 2008 10:42:33 PM
Subject: Taking matters in Our oun Hands.

Since January 1st, 2008, Caps tells Dave that he says Natalee was not in the ocean, but in the pond.
He goes on to tell Dave that he has " established a group to retrieve her body.

Then he says he is amazed Dave doesn't returne his emails or phone calls, but he wants Dave to come to Aruba.


Now, start figuring in the cover-up and how this all adds up.



Please Kermit, no more riddles?! Why not give us your honest opinion?


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #789 1/1/09 -
Post by: 2NJSons_Mom on January 02, 2009, 06:33:16 PM
Forgive me, but these same questions go on for pages...where is the Ignore button? 

 :gaah:


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #789 1/1/09 -
Post by: Tamikosmom on January 02, 2009, 06:33:21 PM
JUG TWITTY



Jug Twitty may have believe that the objective of Persistence undertaking was two fold ... targeting for oil and ... search for his stepdaughter's remains.  I have read "rumors" to the effect very  early on.  Hey ... when you consider John S. profession and ... when you consider Kyle Kingman's profession.

Janet

++++++++

Magnolia
Re: Natalee Case Discussion #788 12/31/08 -
« Reply #337 on: December 31, 2008, 09:34:29 PM »


I just don't understand why people like Mum and Lalas & idstlou and
all of the former posters here are so angry.
Anybody who reads all of this information should see the
truth to it.  They are nitpicking at the least little word.

Why are they so mad about it all?

http://scaredmonkeys.net/index.php?topic=4328.msg605828#msg605828


jen3560
Re: Natalee Case Discussion #788 12/31/08 -
« Reply #343 on: December 31, 2008, 09:40:19 PM »


I'll one up you with a question here.........

why are some at that site saying that JUG knew the MAIN goal of the Persistence for that trip was oil related?

http://scaredmonkeys.net/index.php?topic=4328.msg605846#msg605846



Kyle Kingman
Senior Geophysical Project Manager at Alpine Ocean Seismic Survey Inc.
Greater New York City Area


Current
Senior Geophysical Operations Manager at Alpine Ocean Seismic Survey Inc.
 
Past
Manager at Kingman Geophysical Solutions
 
Education
Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey-New Brunswick
 
Industry
Oil & Energy

http://www.linkedin.com/pub/b/65/464




Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #789 1/1/09 -
Post by: klaasend on January 02, 2009, 06:33:29 PM
LDSTLOU - if Joran van der Sloot emailed me and confessed to Natalee dying and his disposing of her body, would it bother you if I posted the jest of that email in the forum?  Just so people could have a good idea what was sent to me?  Or would you think it more important to honor a private email and not tell anyone about it?

I don't see that Caps was posting any confession. Kermit says she is not allowed to post it and yet she posts it. And no, if I had an e-mail from Joran confessing I would not post it at SM, I would turn it over to the FBI who I am sure would tell me to keep my mouth shut about it and I would keep my mouth shut about it.

And she also didn't post the entire email.  This issue is actually as much about Kyle as it is Caps.

Kermit has said they won't give you any more personal information so please quit asking now that she has answered.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #789 1/1/09 -
Post by: Keepthefaith on January 02, 2009, 06:33:32 PM
Caps was deception personified from the getgo.  His posts give the indication that he did not have a grasp of the English languages.  However ... other posts implied just the contrary.

Janet

+++++++


JANUARY, 2008




CapsLockWizard
Re: Natalee Case Discussion #715 1/25 -
« Reply #384 on: January 27, 2008, 02:51:39 PM »


need to know 2 things

Did Natalee travel somewhere before he come to Aruba

and

and the parents tree   Natalee is the doughter of  -----  and --------- etc.

I know that probably Dave Holloway has notting to do with this Case but the Twitty

Wat is twitty to natalee?

http://scaredmonkeys.net/index.php?topic=2539.msg332978;topicseen#msg332978


MARCH 31, 2008

CapsLockWizard
Re: SHANGO/SIMIAN - who are they and what did they know? #2
« Reply #419 on: March 31, 2008, 03:45:31 PM »


To all that believe that the FBI did notting and believe that they have the resource to work on this.

Shango start posting in June 2005 and in June 2008 it will 3 years and that was a lot of time to solve this.

How do I came here is that I wrote a logic report bases on the information that I have that prove where they could have drop the body. I did not know that this Shango or
Simian existed.

Only this I ask was in the front page of SM in December 2007 was the email of David or Beth to sent them my report.

And that how I got here after Klaasend read the report. I took a look at the Simian and could read it. I could see patterns in it. and so I came about to interpret this simian post. Shango was more complex and after my 4 week of separating the layers , the patterns were about the Ritz and Merge with the Natalee case.

The some key were easy but some key's were complex.

and so I took it upon me to solve this with the help of some that can provide or lookup the information.

and so today we are almost done. The three mayor keys are solved and now there is a mayor key only left and that is the News.

in time all will be public...but in the right form and ethics.

http://scaredmonkeys.net/index.php?topic=2733.400


APRIL 1, 2008

CapsLockWizard
Re: SHANGO/SIMIAN - who are they and what did they know? #2
« Reply #609 on: April 01, 2008, 03:15:49 AM »


my first question this morning around 9:30 was:

Why would beth lie about her being a virgin and who run with the story was fox news. where did they got the news from? I will answer Julia.

Why why would I lhype up something that was not true and now i need some one to run with it. that can colorabrorate and sustain my lie. My friend. who walk with me. both know it is not the true and that makes it like we say in Logic world,  NOT = NOT and that makes it a logic sense.

it can not be OR and can not be AND OR logic. do not compute.

http://scaredmonkeys.net/index.php?topic=2733.msg369749#msg369749



I agree.

In fact CAPS confirmed something today.
CAPS said: "I work alone [b]with a group that can not be put at risk"[/b]

Now, lets refresh our memories, Klassend posted two posts of CAPS and I think several monkeys questioned if it was 2 people, Blonde just posted that too and I agree with you guys.  Janet I recall questioned his posts because his English got better or changed[/b]



Since I can not post the actual proof, I will tell you what Caps emailed to Dave.


On February 10, 2008 10:42:33 PM
Subject: Taking matters in Our oun Hands.

Since January 1st, 2008, Caps tells Dave that he says Natalee was not in the ocean, but in the pond.
He goes on to tell Dave that he has " established a group to retrieve her body.

Then he says he is amazed Dave doesn't returne his emails or phone calls, but he wants Dave to come to Aruba.


Now, start figuring in the cover-up and how this all adds up.



Please Kermit, no more riddles?! Why not give us your honest opinion?

Isn't that a question we should ask Caps..... ::MonkeyLaugh::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #789 1/1/09 -
Post by: texasmom on January 02, 2009, 06:33:55 PM
Posts and posters rise and fall on the credibility of their posting only.  I don't believe that personal biographical information about a particular poster is necessary for people to determine the validity of what they post.

That said, isn't posting personal information about other posters against the forum rules?



Yes.  Sometimes posters volunteer personal information and then of course it's OK.  But otherwise personal information about posters is nobody's business.

ok...I have seen it posted several times that kermit took down a president, and that has been part of her credibilty for some it seems. Am I then allowed to ask what president and how? jeez.

I don't see where I directed my comment to you but I'll respond anyway.  You can ask all you want but it's inappropriate and don't expect an answer.

Personally, whether a person "took down" a president or not makes no difference to me.  It does not change how I feel about Kermit or Caps or anyone else.

posters keep posting this comment in reference to kermit's credibility. Why can't I ask about it then?

SHE JUST SHOWED YOU 2 PHOTOS OF HER WORKING FOR PRES CLINTON!! WHAT THE HECK ELSE DO YOU WANT?



To distract from the FACTS!  That's what it's all about for her.  IMO


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #789 1/1/09 -
Post by: Blue Moon on January 02, 2009, 06:34:21 PM
Forgive me, but these same questions go on for pages...where is the Ignore button? 

 :gaah:

I was going to ask earlier if we had an ignore button but I didn't want to sound crude.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #789 1/1/09 -
Post by: 2NJSons_Mom on January 02, 2009, 06:35:58 PM
Forgive me, but these same questions go on for pages...where is the Ignore button? 

 :gaah:

I was going to ask earlier if we had an ignore button but I didn't want to sound crude.

Well, thanks Blue Moon.....guess that says a lot about me.   ::MonkeyHaHa::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #789 1/1/09 -
Post by: Keepthefaith on January 02, 2009, 06:36:34 PM
Forgive me, but these same questions go on for pages...where is the Ignore button? 

 :gaah:

I was going to ask earlier if we had an ignore button but I didn't want to sound crude.

Well, thanks Blue Moon.....guess that says a lot about me.   ::MonkeyHaHa::

 ::MonkeyLaugh::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #789 1/1/09 -
Post by: Kermit on January 02, 2009, 06:37:01 PM
LDSTLOU - if Joran van der Sloot emailed me and confessed to Natalee dying and his disposing of her body, would it bother you if I posted the jest of that email in the forum?  Just so people could have a good idea what was sent to me?  Or would you think it more important to honor a private email and not tell anyone about it?

I don't see that Caps was posting any confession. Kermit says she is not allowed to post it and yet she posts it. And no, if I had an e-mail from Joran confessing I would not post it at SM, I would turn it over to the FBI who I am sure would tell me to keep my mouth shut about it and I would keep my mouth shut about it.

Your twisting my words again.
Better go back and re-read so you can follow it correctly.



Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #789 1/1/09 -
Post by: Blue Moon on January 02, 2009, 06:37:12 PM
Forgive me, but these same questions go on for pages...where is the Ignore button? 

 :gaah:

I was going to ask earlier if we had an ignore button but I didn't want to sound crude.

Well, thanks Blue Moon.....guess that says a lot about me.   ::MonkeyHaHa::

No I am sorry-didn't mean it that way.  It just sounds better coming from a mod and not an ordinary poster.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #789 1/1/09 -
Post by: Artcolley on January 02, 2009, 06:37:47 PM
OH, I dunno,

Personally, I've got my eye on Klaas's popcorn  ::cartwheel::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #789 1/1/09 -
Post by: ldstlou on January 02, 2009, 06:37:51 PM
LDSTLOU - if Joran van der Sloot emailed me and confessed to Natalee dying and his disposing of her body, would it bother you if I posted the jest of that email in the forum?  Just so people could have a good idea what was sent to me?  Or would you think it more important to honor a private email and not tell anyone about it?

I don't see that Caps was posting any confession. Kermit says she is not allowed to post it and yet she posts it. And no, if I had an e-mail from Joran confessing I would not post it at SM, I would turn it over to the FBI who I am sure would tell me to keep my mouth shut about it and I would keep my mouth shut about it.

Which Kyle DID NOT do.  He posted on a private forum his concerns instead of giving the information to the FBI.

that is not true. All footage was turned over to the FBI. Do you wonder why JQK, Tim Miller, Dateline the FBI and the Family are not speaking out about the Persistence? Could it be because it was all done on the up and up? Kyle also asked that his posts not be made public. I believe Jen's letter said they sought legal advice and were told not to publish his posts...am I wrong?


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #789 1/1/09 -
Post by: Kermit on January 02, 2009, 06:37:56 PM
Forgive me, but these same questions go on for pages...where is the Ignore button? 

 :gaah:

I was going to ask earlier if we had an ignore button but I didn't want to sound crude.

Doesn't sound crude at all.



Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #789 1/1/09 -
Post by: Anna on January 02, 2009, 06:38:17 PM
Are we as posters now required to submit a resume complete with photos?

Neither Kermit nor anyone else's credibility with me hinges on past employment.

Posters live or die by the credibility of their posts.  I don't recall ever seeing anyone say they only believe Kermit because of past employment record.



Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #789 1/1/09 -
Post by: Tamikosmom on January 02, 2009, 06:38:36 PM
I do not need an ignore option.  I just read/scan and scroll by.

However ... the edit option is another topic that I believe should be persued.

 ::MonkeyWaa::

Janet


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #789 1/1/09 -
Post by: hotping on January 02, 2009, 06:39:09 PM
Why don't We just ignore these distraction posters then maybe they will just go away.... ::MonkeyWink::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #789 1/1/09 -
Post by: Keepthefaith on January 02, 2009, 06:39:34 PM
LDSTLOU - if Joran van der Sloot emailed me and confessed to Natalee dying and his disposing of her body, would it bother you if I posted the jest of that email in the forum?  Just so people could have a good idea what was sent to me?  Or would you think it more important to honor a private email and not tell anyone about it?

I don't see that Caps was posting any confession. Kermit says she is not allowed to post it and yet she posts it. And no, if I had an e-mail from Joran confessing I would not post it at SM, I would turn it over to the FBI who I am sure would tell me to keep my mouth shut about it and I would keep my mouth shut about it.

Which Kyle DID NOT do.  He posted on a private forum his concerns instead of giving the information to the FBI.

that is not true. All footage was turned over to the FBI. Do you wonder why JQK, Tim Miller, Dateline the FBI and the Family are not speaking out about the Persistence? Could it be because it was all done on the up and up? Kyle also asked that his posts not be made public. I believe Jen's letter said they sought legal advice and were told not to publish his posts...am I wrong?

From what i understand  it was about obstruction of justice.Correct me if i'm wrong Kermit!


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #789 1/1/09 -
Post by: Kermit on January 02, 2009, 06:39:54 PM
(http://triton.imageshack.us/Himg70/scaled.php?server=70&filename=digicelpx2.jpg&xsize=578&ysize=480)
* Arlene Ellis-Schipper is a board of directors for CMB bank http://www.cmbnv.com/directors.php
* Paulus van der Sloot went to the CMB bank twice the day after Natalee was kidnapped by his son
* Lincoln Gomez and Nilo Swean are financial guys on the boards of these banks
(I'm going to add to this original post that the banks are significant to follow the money)
http://scaredmonkeys.net/index.php?topic=4186.520


Anita's email was SETAR

Anita van der Sloot email:
> > > > >(i edited) @setarnet.aw

SO IS Gottenbos
Email: ica@setarnet.aw

The 100 million dollars that Croes is talking about is the tax exemption or tax holiday that the refinery currently has. “Setar pays every year 75 million florins in taxes”, said Croes.
http://tinyurl.com/qefda
http://scaredmonkeys.net/index.php?topic=4186.620

Dayhiker
Scared Monkey
*
Offline Offline
Posts: 3788
View Profile
Re: Natalee Case Discussion #781 12/3/08 -
« Reply #489 on: December 04, 2008, 12:49:24 PM »
Pardon me for not getting back to you quickly Mum, had some work to do. There was a photo posted here, maybe by the frog, that showed the phone company and bank right next to each other. If someone can find that it should help us clear this up.
http://scaredmonkeys.net/index.php?topic=4186.msg566433#msg566433




Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #789 1/1/09 -
Post by: ldstlou on January 02, 2009, 06:41:25 PM
Posts and posters rise and fall on the credibility of their posting only.  I don't believe that personal biographical information about a particular poster is necessary for people to determine the validity of what they post.

That said, isn't posting personal information about other posters against the forum rules?



Yes.  Sometimes posters volunteer personal information and then of course it's OK.  But otherwise personal information about posters is nobody's business.

ok...I have seen it posted several times that kermit took down a president, and that has been part of her credibility for some it seems. Am I then allowed to ask what president and how? jeez.

I don't see where I directed my comment to you but I'll respond anyway.  You can ask all you want but it's inappropriate and don't expect an answer.

Personally, whether a person "took down" a president or not makes no difference to me.  It does not change how I feel about Kermit or Caps or anyone else.

posters keep posting this comment in reference to kermit's credibility. Why can't I ask about it then?

SHE JUST SHOWED YOU 2 PHOTOS OF HER WORKING FOR PRES CLINTON!! WHAT THE HECK ELSE DO YOU WANT?



To distract from the FACTS!  That's what it's all about for her.  IMO

ok...call it distract. I don't agree with what Kermit has done or alleged. I have stated that since I first read her posts. So I voice my disagreement and it is a distraction or I am part of the conspiracy. Why can't I just disagree with what she has said and done? I am not the only one who disagrees.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #789 1/1/09 -
Post by: Kermit on January 02, 2009, 06:42:34 PM
Are we as posters now required to submit a resume complete with photos?

Neither Kermit nor anyone else's credibility with me hinges on past employment.

Posters live or die by the credibility of their posts.  I don't recall ever seeing anyone say they only believe Kermit because of past employment record.



Thank you Anna.
I happen to agree with you and not just because Idstlou puts me in the hot seat.
Although I guess I could have said to her, "show me yours and I'll show you mine."
heh heh



Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #789 1/1/09 -
Post by: ldstlou on January 02, 2009, 06:43:02 PM
I have been here awhile too. I disagree with kermit and what she has done and now I am a "distractor' or a conspirator and suddenly the enemy. There is something really wrong with that imho.

off to basketball.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #789 1/1/09 -
Post by: KYcat on January 02, 2009, 06:43:16 PM
KLAAS, CAN WE HAVE THE POPCORN KITTY, PLEASE????

(http://i118.photobucket.com/albums/o100/klaasen3/Sub5/kittycorn-1.gif)




 ::MonkeyLaugh::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #789 1/1/09 -
Post by: klaasend on January 02, 2009, 06:43:57 PM
LDSTLOU - if Joran van der Sloot emailed me and confessed to Natalee dying and his disposing of her body, would it bother you if I posted the jest of that email in the forum?  Just so people could have a good idea what was sent to me?  Or would you think it more important to honor a private email and not tell anyone about it?

I don't see that Caps was posting any confession. Kermit says she is not allowed to post it and yet she posts it. And no, if I had an e-mail from Joran confessing I would not post it at SM, I would turn it over to the FBI who I am sure would tell me to keep my mouth shut about it and I would keep my mouth shut about it.

Which Kyle DID NOT do.  He posted on a private forum his concerns instead of giving the information to the FBI.

that is not true. All footage was turned over to the FBI. Do you wonder why JQK, Tim Miller, Dateline the FBI and the Family are not speaking out about the Persistence? Could it be because it was all done on the up and up? Kyle also asked that his posts not be made public. I believe Jen's letter said they sought legal advice and were told not to publish his posts...am I wrong?

Yes, I believe you are WRONG:

1.  From Kermit's and Kyle's posts the information was turned over to the FBI and JQK because neither Kyle or John Silvetti did.

2.  I believe Jen stated they were told to stay away from Kyle, nothing about NOT publishing his posts.  I think it was Kyle that threatened people if they published them.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #789 1/1/09 -
Post by: bastibro on January 02, 2009, 06:44:21 PM
Caps was deception personified from the getgo.  His posts give the indication that he did not have a grasp of the English languages.  However ... other posts implied just the contrary.

Janet

+++++++


JANUARY, 2008




CapsLockWizard
Re: Natalee Case Discussion #715 1/25 -
« Reply #384 on: January 27, 2008, 02:51:39 PM »


need to know 2 things

Did Natalee travel somewhere before he come to Aruba

and

and the parents tree   Natalee is the doughter of  -----  and --------- etc.

I know that probably Dave Holloway has notting to do with this Case but the Twitty

Wat is twitty to natalee?

http://scaredmonkeys.net/index.php?topic=2539.msg332978;topicseen#msg332978


MARCH 31, 2008

CapsLockWizard
Re: SHANGO/SIMIAN - who are they and what did they know? #2
« Reply #419 on: March 31, 2008, 03:45:31 PM »


To all that believe that the FBI did notting and believe that they have the resource to work on this.

Shango start posting in June 2005 and in June 2008 it will 3 years and that was a lot of time to solve this.

How do I came here is that I wrote a logic report bases on the information that I have that prove where they could have drop the body. I did not know that this Shango or
Simian existed.

Only this I ask was in the front page of SM in December 2007 was the email of David or Beth to sent them my report.

And that how I got here after Klaasend read the report. I took a look at the Simian and could read it. I could see patterns in it. and so I came about to interpret this simian post. Shango was more complex and after my 4 week of separating the layers , the patterns were about the Ritz and Merge with the Natalee case.

The some key were easy but some key's were complex.

and so I took it upon me to solve this with the help of some that can provide or lookup the information.

and so today we are almost done. The three mayor keys are solved and now there is a mayor key only left and that is the News.

in time all will be public...but in the right form and ethics.

http://scaredmonkeys.net/index.php?topic=2733.400


APRIL 1, 2008

CapsLockWizard
Re: SHANGO/SIMIAN - who are they and what did they know? #2
« Reply #609 on: April 01, 2008, 03:15:49 AM »


my first question this morning around 9:30 was:

Why would beth lie about her being a virgin and who run with the story was fox news. where did they got the news from? I will answer Julia.

Why why would I lhype up something that was not true and now i need some one to run with it. that can colorabrorate and sustain my lie. My friend. who walk with me. both know it is not the true and that makes it like we say in Logic world,  NOT = NOT and that makes it a logic sense.

it can not be OR and can not be AND OR logic. do not compute.

http://scaredmonkeys.net/index.php?topic=2733.msg369749#msg369749



I agree.

In fact CAPS confirmed something today.
CAPS said: "I work alone [b]with a group that can not be put at risk"[/b]

Now, lets refresh our memories, Klassend posted two posts of CAPS and I think several monkeys questioned if it was 2 people, Blonde just posted that too and I agree with you guys.  Janet I recall questioned his posts because his English got better or changed[/b]



Since I can not post the actual proof, I will tell you what Caps emailed to Dave.


On February 10, 2008 10:42:33 PM
Subject: Taking matters in Our oun Hands.

Since January 1st, 2008, Caps tells Dave that he says Natalee was not in the ocean, but in the pond.
He goes on to tell Dave that he has " established a group to retrieve her body.

Then he says he is amazed Dave doesn't returne his emails or phone calls, but he wants Dave to come to Aruba.


Now, start figuring in the cover-up and how this all adds up.



Please Kermit, no more riddles?! Why not give us your honest opinion?

Isn't that a question we should ask Caps..... ::MonkeyLaugh::

Yes sure, why all so vague? Both Kermit and Caps are very vague. This is not a game like: I give you some riddles and leave you for the next 2 days to figure it out . .  ::MonkeyNoNo::

Sorry but this is my humble opinion.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #789 1/1/09 -
Post by: Kermit on January 02, 2009, 06:44:37 PM
ok...call it distract. I don't agree with what Kermit has done or alleged. I have stated that since I first read her posts. So I voice my disagreement and it is a distraction or I am part of the conspiracy. Why can't I just disagree with what she has said and done? I am not the only one who disagrees.

I believe the problem is you don't just disagree, you want me to tell you personal information. I'm not going to do that. You can object and discuss your objections with me, I don't have a problem with that, but your constant need to have personal information is quite disturbing.

I'll just skip your posts and you have a good evening.





Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #789 1/1/09 -
Post by: wreck on January 02, 2009, 06:44:58 PM
Posts and posters rise and fall on the credibility of their posting only.  I don't believe that personal biographical information about a particular poster is necessary for people to determine the validity of what they post.

That said, isn't posting personal information about other posters against the forum rules?



Yes.  Sometimes posters volunteer personal information and then of course it's OK.  But otherwise personal information about posters is nobody's business.

ok...I have seen it posted several times that kermit took down a president, and that has been part of her credibility for some it seems. Am I then allowed to ask what president and how? jeez.

I don't see where I directed my comment to you but I'll respond anyway.  You can ask all you want but it's inappropriate and don't expect an answer.

Personally, whether a person "took down" a president or not makes no difference to me.  It does not change how I feel about Kermit or Caps or anyone else.

posters keep posting this comment in reference to kermit's credibility. Why can't I ask about it then?

SHE JUST SHOWED YOU 2 PHOTOS OF HER WORKING FOR PRES CLINTON!! WHAT THE HECK ELSE DO YOU WANT?



To distract from the FACTS!  That's what it's all about for her.  IMO

ok...call it distract. I don't agree with what Kermit has done or alleged. I have stated that since I first read her posts. So I voice my disagreement and it is a distraction or I am part of the conspiracy. Why can't I just disagree with what she has said and done? I am not the only one who disagrees.
You disagree -- so noted.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #789 1/1/09 -
Post by: ldstlou on January 02, 2009, 06:45:02 PM
LDSTLOU - if Joran van der Sloot emailed me and confessed to Natalee dying and his disposing of her body, would it bother you if I posted the jest of that email in the forum?  Just so people could have a good idea what was sent to me?  Or would you think it more important to honor a private email and not tell anyone about it?

I don't see that Caps was posting any confession. Kermit says she is not allowed to post it and yet she posts it. And no, if I had an e-mail from Joran confessing I would not post it at SM, I would turn it over to the FBI who I am sure would tell me to keep my mouth shut about it and I would keep my mouth shut about it.

Which Kyle DID NOT do.  He posted on a private forum his concerns instead of giving the information to the FBI.

that is not true. All footage was turned over to the FBI. Do you wonder why JQK, Tim Miller, Dateline the FBI and the Family are not speaking out about the Persistence? Could it be because it was all done on the up and up? Kyle also asked that his posts not be made public. I believe Jen's letter said they sought legal advice and were told not to publish his posts...am I wrong?

From what i understand  it was about obstruction of justice.Correct me if i'm wrong Kermit!

according to whom? Not the FBI. The FBI do not have a problem with Kyle. In fact, they told him to ignore Kermit she was not important. She once again...posted that e-mail from Kyle to her...you all read it and ignored it.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #789 1/1/09 -
Post by: Anna on January 02, 2009, 06:45:16 PM
(http://triton.imageshack.us/Himg70/scaled.php?server=70&filename=digicelpx2.jpg&xsize=578&ysize=480)



What a lovely color that building is!  As a Dutch American I can truly say that the Dutch do make the nicest and best paint in the world!

I wonder what the name of that color might be.  Would love to use it sometime.
I know Tylergal has used some Dutch imported paint but is it out of my price range by about $100 per gallon!

Still, that would make a wonderful color for inside as well.


.



Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #789 1/1/09 -
Post by: hotping on January 02, 2009, 06:45:26 PM
Thank Goodness for Basketball!  ::MonkeyWink::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #789 1/1/09 -
Post by: Blue Moon on January 02, 2009, 06:45:29 PM
LDSTLOU - if Joran van der Sloot emailed me and confessed to Natalee dying and his disposing of her body, would it bother you if I posted the jest of that email in the forum?  Just so people could have a good idea what was sent to me?  Or would you think it more important to honor a private email and not tell anyone about it?

I don't see that Caps was posting any confession. Kermit says she is not allowed to post it and yet she posts it. And no, if I had an e-mail from Joran confessing I would not post it at SM, I would turn it over to the FBI who I am sure would tell me to keep my mouth shut about it and I would keep my mouth shut about it.

Which Kyle DID NOT do.  He posted on a private forum his concerns instead of giving the information to the FBI.

that is not true. All footage was turned over to the FBI. Do you wonder why JQK, Tim Miller, Dateline the FBI and the Family are not speaking out about the Persistence? Could it be because it was all done on the up and up? Kyle also asked that his posts not be made public. I believe Jen's letter said they sought legal advice and were told not to publish his posts...am I wrong?

Yes, I believe you are WRONG:

1.  From Kermit's and Kyle's posts the information was turned over to the FBI and JQK because neither Kyle or John Silvetti did.

2.  I believe Jen stated they were told to stay away from Kyle, nothing about NOT publishing his posts.  I think it was Kyle that threatened people if they published them.

Thanks Klaas, I can't get the hang of attack mode.  Having a hard time understanding the attacks on Kermit when it was Kyle's own words.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #789 1/1/09 -
Post by: Keepthefaith on January 02, 2009, 06:46:30 PM
ok...call it distract. I don't agree with what Kermit has done or alleged. I have stated that since I first read her posts. So I voice my disagreement and it is a distraction or I am part of the conspiracy. Why can't I just disagree with what she has said and done? I am not the only one who disagrees.

I believe the problem is you don't just disagree, you want me to tell you personal information. I'm not going to do that. You can object and discuss your objections with me, I don't have a problem with that, but your constant need to have personal information is quite disturbing.

I'll just skip your posts and you have a good evening.





I wanna know which pond you frequent,as well as which lily pad you live on?.Jus kiddin...
 ::MonkeyDance::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #789 1/1/09 -
Post by: ldstlou on January 02, 2009, 06:46:43 PM
ok...call it distract. I don't agree with what Kermit has done or alleged. I have stated that since I first read her posts. So I voice my disagreement and it is a distraction or I am part of the conspiracy. Why can't I just disagree with what she has said and done? I am not the only one who disagrees.

I believe the problem is you don't just disagree, you want me to tell you personal information. I'm not going to do that. You can object and discuss your objections with me, I don't have a problem with that, but your constant need to have personal information is quite disturbing.

I'll just skip your posts and you have a good evening.





I stated that posters have said part of your credibility stems from taking down a president and working beside two others. I simply asked them to elaborate. You don't have to tell me a thing if you don't want to.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #789 1/1/09 -
Post by: Keepthefaith on January 02, 2009, 06:47:54 PM
LDSTLOU - if Joran van der Sloot emailed me and confessed to Natalee dying and his disposing of her body, would it bother you if I posted the jest of that email in the forum?  Just so people could have a good idea what was sent to me?  Or would you think it more important to honor a private email and not tell anyone about it?

I don't see that Caps was posting any confession. Kermit says she is not allowed to post it and yet she posts it. And no, if I had an e-mail from Joran confessing I would not post it at SM, I would turn it over to the FBI who I am sure would tell me to keep my mouth shut about it and I would keep my mouth shut about it.

Which Kyle DID NOT do.  He posted on a private forum his concerns instead of giving the information to the FBI.

that is not true. All footage was turned over to the FBI. Do you wonder why JQK, Tim Miller, Dateline the FBI and the Family are not speaking out about the Persistence? Could it be because it was all done on the up and up? Kyle also asked that his posts not be made public. I believe Jen's letter said they sought legal advice and were told not to publish his posts...am I wrong?

From what i understand  it was about obstruction of justice.Correct me if i'm wrong Kermit!

according to whom? Not the FBI. The FBI do not have a problem with Kyle. In fact, they told him to ignore Kermit she was not important. She once again...posted that e-mail from Kyle to her...you all read it and ignored it.

If your information is coming from Kyle isn't that in and of itself a problem?He,in his own words didn't turn everything over!!


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #789 1/1/09 -
Post by: Kermit on January 02, 2009, 06:49:32 PM


Yes sure, why all so vague? Both Kermit and Caps are very vague. This is not a game like: I give you some riddles and leave you for the next 2 days to figure it out . .  ::MonkeyNoNo::

Sorry but this is my humble opinion.

I have given you a LOT of information. I don't call that vague.
AND I do not use riddles, I gave you proof as it is allowed in the forums.
If I could post the emails I would, It is not allowed. I am always and have been upfront.
You can decide for yourself's, is my belief, what the truth is when you have all the information.
That is what I have been providing to you.
I hardly think you or anyone at SM knew that Kyle was off trying to sell the ROV videos/photos.

So, if that is as you say, vague, I'm sorry. I guess it's just what it is.





Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #789 1/1/09 -
Post by: Tamikosmom on January 02, 2009, 06:49:55 PM
LDSTLOU - if Joran van der Sloot emailed me and confessed to Natalee dying and his disposing of her body, would it bother you if I posted the jest of that email in the forum?  Just so people could have a good idea what was sent to me?  Or would you think it more important to honor a private email and not tell anyone about it?

I don't see that Caps was posting any confession. Kermit says she is not allowed to post it and yet she posts it. And no, if I had an e-mail from Joran confessing I would not post it at SM, I would turn it over to the FBI who I am sure would tell me to keep my mouth shut about it and I would keep my mouth shut about it.

Which Kyle DID NOT do.  He posted on a private forum his concerns instead of giving the information to the FBI.

that is not true. All footage was turned over to the FBI. Do you wonder why JQK, Tim Miller, Dateline the FBI and the Family are not speaking out about the Persistence? Could it be because it was all done on the up and up? Kyle also asked that his posts not be made public. I believe Jen's letter said they sought legal advice and were told not to publish his posts...am I wrong?

Lou ... please read Kyle's own words.  I have posted them over and over and over and over again.  Do you not believe Kyle or ... is Kyle distancing himself from his own words.

Janet

KYLE KINGMAN - PRIVATE FORUM
http://scaredmonkeys.net/index.php?topic=4340.msg609289#msg609289


jen3560
Re: Natalee Case Discussion #788 12/31/08 -
« Reply #54 on: December 31, 2008, 04:36:13 PM »


KeeptheFaith and Janet,

After we discovered this information had been withheld from US authorities, we contacted legal counsel, and were advised to keep our distance from Persistence crew members and benefactors - that is when and why Kyle was banned.

That occurred the end of September.

http://scaredmonkeys.net/index.php?topic=4328.msg605250#msg605250



Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #789 1/1/09 -
Post by: Patriot on January 02, 2009, 06:51:20 PM
LDSTLOU - if Joran van der Sloot emailed me and confessed to Natalee dying and his disposing of her body, would it bother you if I posted the jest of that email in the forum?  Just so people could have a good idea what was sent to me?  Or would you think it more important to honor a private email and not tell anyone about it?

I don't see that Caps was posting any confession. Kermit says she is not allowed to post it and yet she posts it. And no, if I had an e-mail from Joran confessing I would not post it at SM, I would turn it over to the FBI who I am sure would tell me to keep my mouth shut about it and I would keep my mouth shut about it.

Which Kyle DID NOT do.  He posted on a private forum his concerns instead of giving the information to the FBI.

that is not true. All footage was turned over to the FBI. Do you wonder why JQK, Tim Miller, Dateline the FBI and the Family are not speaking out about the Persistence? Could it be because it was all done on the up and up? Kyle also asked that his posts not be made public. I believe Jen's letter said they sought legal advice and were told not to publish his posts...am I wrong?

From what i understand  it was about obstruction of justice.Correct me if i'm wrong Kermit!

according to whom? Not the FBI. The FBI do not have a problem with Kyle. In fact, they told him to ignore Kermit she was not important. She once again...posted that e-mail from Kyle to her...you all read it and ignored it.

Do you speak for the FBI now?


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #789 1/1/09 -
Post by: wreck on January 02, 2009, 06:52:24 PM
LDSTLOU - if Joran van der Sloot emailed me and confessed to Natalee dying and his disposing of her body, would it bother you if I posted the jest of that email in the forum?  Just so people could have a good idea what was sent to me?  Or would you think it more important to honor a private email and not tell anyone about it?

I don't see that Caps was posting any confession. Kermit says she is not allowed to post it and yet she posts it. And no, if I had an e-mail from Joran confessing I would not post it at SM, I would turn it over to the FBI who I am sure would tell me to keep my mouth shut about it and I would keep my mouth shut about it.

Which Kyle DID NOT do.  He posted on a private forum his concerns instead of giving the information to the FBI.

that is not true. All footage was turned over to the FBI. Do you wonder why JQK, Tim Miller, Dateline the FBI and the Family are not speaking out about the Persistence? Could it be because it was all done on the up and up? Kyle also asked that his posts not be made public. I believe Jen's letter said they sought legal advice and were told not to publish his posts...am I wrong?

Lou ... please read Kyle's own words.  I have posted them over and over and over and over again.  Do you not believe Kyle or ... is Kyle distancing himself from his own words.

Janet

KYLE KINGMAN - PRIVATE FORUM
http://scaredmonkeys.net/index.php?topic=4340.msg609289#msg609289


jen3560
Re: Natalee Case Discussion #788 12/31/08 -
« Reply #54 on: December 31, 2008, 04:36:13 PM »


KeeptheFaith and Janet,

After we discovered this information had been withheld from US authorities, we contacted legal counsel, and were advised to keep our distance from Persistence crew members and benefactors - that is when and why Kyle was banned.

That occurred the end of September.

http://scaredmonkeys.net/index.php?topic=4328.msg605250#msg605250


She doesn't actually read our responses -- she is too busy preparing her next post.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #789 1/1/09 -
Post by: klaasend on January 02, 2009, 06:53:11 PM
ok...call it distract. I don't agree with what Kermit has done or alleged. I have stated that since I first read her posts. So I voice my disagreement and it is a distraction or I am part of the conspiracy. Why can't I just disagree with what she has said and done? I am not the only one who disagrees.

I believe the problem is you don't just disagree, you want me to tell you personal information. I'm not going to do that. You can object and discuss your objections with me, I don't have a problem with that, but your constant need to have personal information is quite disturbing.

I'll just skip your posts and you have a good evening.





I stated that posters have said part of your credibility stems from taking down a president and working beside two others. I simply asked them to elaborate. You don't have to tell me a thing if you don't want to.

This may be true but I don't remember.  Can you link me to the post or name the posters that said this? 


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #789 1/1/09 -
Post by: Kermit on January 02, 2009, 06:53:16 PM
ok...call it distract. I don't agree with what Kermit has done or alleged. I have stated that since I first read her posts. So I voice my disagreement and it is a distraction or I am part of the conspiracy. Why can't I just disagree with what she has said and done? I am not the only one who disagrees.

I believe the problem is you don't just disagree, you want me to tell you personal information. I'm not going to do that. You can object and discuss your objections with me, I don't have a problem with that, but your constant need to have personal information is quite disturbing.

I'll just skip your posts and you have a good evening.





I stated that posters have said part of your credibility stems from taking down a president and working beside two others. I simply asked them to elaborate. You don't have to tell me a thing if you don't want to.

And as I stated before. I am not going to give you my resume'.
And I'm not asking for yours either.

I am here and have been here since the beginning for Justice in the Natalee Holloway case.
Believe what I have posted or do not - of course it's yours and anyone else's choice. I ain't forcing no one to do anything or beelive anything.
BUT I am just telling you as well as 5 other Freebirds, we have no reason to lie to you. Nor have we.
Bringing Natalee home is the goal. Nothing else.




Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #789 1/1/09 -
Post by: Blonde on January 02, 2009, 06:53:40 PM
CAPS SAID

So like a said: in colombia they call those that make information up to confuse the issues of this case a SAPO.

FROM WIKI

Sapo is the Portuguese and Spanish term for a toad.

I believe CAPS is telling us that Kermie is deliberately making things up to confuse us.

 ::MonkeyEek::

BS kermit worked with two presidents brought down one.
NO WAY she is deliberately making things up to confuse us.
 I thinks it's Caps that's confusing us.
I also thinks he's more then one poster. JMO


This is a legit question, because statements like these have really caused me to question the motives of Kermit. What president did he/she bring down? Nixon? I thought it was Deepthroat who just passed away that brought down Nixon.

So Kermit brought down a president. And she/he single handily exposed the "Aruba cover-up". I know Klaas says she never said that but look up her posts, she claimed that here and on BFN. This really makes me think the motivation is about ego and not Natalee. I have seen several references to her taking down a president, is it something that can be substantiated?

Also Jen states that there are rumors floating that Jug knew the Persistence was first about oil, second about Natalee? Wow...is that her theory...whose theory? Just speculation or rumor? Those are some serious accusations imho.
It was at NH.Net in 2005.

You know ldstlou , you realy shouldn't be so rude, you don't know who Kermit is I do, and have for over three years now , plus she is a very nice  person.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #789 1/1/09 -
Post by: Patriot on January 02, 2009, 06:54:27 PM
BTW, Kermit thank you for your service to our country.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #789 1/1/09 -
Post by: Kermit on January 02, 2009, 06:58:24 PM
LDSTLOU - if Joran van der Sloot emailed me and confessed to Natalee dying and his disposing of her body, would it bother you if I posted the jest of that email in the forum?  Just so people could have a good idea what was sent to me?  Or would you think it more important to honor a private email and not tell anyone about it?



I don't see that Caps was posting any confession. Kermit says she is not allowed to post it and yet she posts it. And no, if I had an e-mail from Joran confessing I would not post it at SM, I would turn it over to the FBI who I am sure would tell me to keep my mouth shut about it and I would keep my mouth shut about it.

Which Kyle DID NOT do.  He posted on a private forum his concerns instead of giving the information to the FBI.

that is not true. All footage was turned over to the FBI. Do you wonder why JQK, Tim Miller, Dateline the FBI and the Family are not speaking out about the Persistence? Could it be because it was all done on the up and up? Kyle also asked that his posts not be made public. I believe Jen's letter said they sought legal advice and were told not to publish his posts...am I wrong?

From what i understand  it was about obstruction of justice.Correct me if i'm wrong Kermit!

according to whom? Not the FBI. The FBI do not have a problem with Kyle. In fact, they told him to ignore Kermit she was not important. She once again...posted that e-mail from Kyle to her...you all read it and ignored it.

Do you speak for the FBI now?


Kyle was contacted by the FBI AFTER Freebirds sent the evidence/information to them.
I am sure he was squirming. And I'm sure he told Miss Idstlou that he had been contacted by them.
He just left out the part of WHEN he was contacted. AND YES IDSTLOU I HAVE PROOF OF THAT DATE
HE WAS CONTACTED.

Yes, Kyle said the FBI said to not worry about kermit.

KYLE: But what about Kermit?
FBI : Don't you worry bout ol kermmie
 ::MonkeyCool::




Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #789 1/1/09 -
Post by: Keepthefaith on January 02, 2009, 06:58:54 PM
BTW, Kermit thank you for your service to our country.

As well as doing all those TV shows with miss piggy and Gonzo,etc,etc..Don't know how you managed a dual career like that.... ::MonkeyDance:: ::MonkeyDance::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #789 1/1/09 -
Post by: Tamikosmom on January 02, 2009, 06:59:16 PM
Caps was deception personified from the getgo.  His posts give the indication that he did not have a grasp of the English languages.  However ... other posts implied just the contrary.

Janet

+++++++


JANUARY, 2008




CapsLockWizard
Re: Natalee Case Discussion #715 1/25 -
« Reply #384 on: January 27, 2008, 02:51:39 PM »


need to know 2 things

Did Natalee travel somewhere before he come to Aruba

and

and the parents tree   Natalee is the doughter of  -----  and --------- etc.

I know that probably Dave Holloway has notting to do with this Case but the Twitty

Wat is twitty to natalee?

http://scaredmonkeys.net/index.php?topic=2539.msg332978;topicseen#msg332978


MARCH 31, 2008

CapsLockWizard
Re: SHANGO/SIMIAN - who are they and what did they know? #2
« Reply #419 on: March 31, 2008, 03:45:31 PM »


To all that believe that the FBI did notting and believe that they have the resource to work on this.

Shango start posting in June 2005 and in June 2008 it will 3 years and that was a lot of time to solve this.

How do I came here is that I wrote a logic report bases on the information that I have that prove where they could have drop the body. I did not know that this Shango or
Simian existed.

Only this I ask was in the front page of SM in December 2007 was the email of David or Beth to sent them my report.

And that how I got here after Klaasend read the report. I took a look at the Simian and could read it. I could see patterns in it. and so I came about to interpret this simian post. Shango was more complex and after my 4 week of separating the layers , the patterns were about the Ritz and Merge with the Natalee case.

The some key were easy but some key's were complex.

and so I took it upon me to solve this with the help of some that can provide or lookup the information.

and so today we are almost done. The three mayor keys are solved and now there is a mayor key only left and that is the News.

in time all will be public...but in the right form and ethics.

http://scaredmonkeys.net/index.php?topic=2733.400


APRIL 1, 2008

CapsLockWizard
Re: SHANGO/SIMIAN - who are they and what did they know? #2
« Reply #609 on: April 01, 2008, 03:15:49 AM »


my first question this morning around 9:30 was:

Why would beth lie about her being a virgin and who run with the story was fox news. where did they got the news from? I will answer Julia.

Why why would I lhype up something that was not true and now i need some one to run with it. that can colorabrorate and sustain my lie. My friend. who walk with me. both know it is not the true and that makes it like we say in Logic world,  NOT = NOT and that makes it a logic sense.

it can not be OR and can not be AND OR logic. do not compute.

http://scaredmonkeys.net/index.php?topic=2733.msg369749#msg369749



I agree.

In fact CAPS confirmed something today.
CAPS said: "I work alone [b]with a group that can not be put at risk"[/b]

Now, lets refresh our memories, Klassend posted two posts of CAPS and I think several monkeys questioned if it was 2 people, Blonde just posted that too and I agree with you guys.  Janet I recall questioned his posts because his English got better or changed[/b]



Since I can not post the actual proof, I will tell you what Caps emailed to Dave.


On February 10, 2008 10:42:33 PM
Subject: Taking matters in Our oun Hands.

Since January 1st, 2008, Caps tells Dave that he says Natalee was not in the ocean, but in the pond.
He goes on to tell Dave that he has " established a group to retrieve her body.

Then he says he is amazed Dave doesn't returne his emails or phone calls, but he wants Dave to come to Aruba.


Now, start figuring in the cover-up and how this all adds up.



Please Kermit, no more riddles?! Why not give us your honest opinion?

Isn't that a question we should ask Caps..... ::MonkeyLaugh::

Yes sure, why all so vague? Both Kermit and Caps are very vague. This is not a game like: I give you some riddles and leave you for the next 2 days to figure it out . .  ::MonkeyNoNo::

Sorry but this is my humble opinion.

Kermit is the messenger who has shared a message that orginated from Kyle Kingman that CLEARLY relates a story ... a story that reveals that the Persistence undertaking was a betrayal to Natalee Holloway ... a betrayal to the family and ... a betrayal tothose who sacrificially donated.

Janet

______

KYLE KINGMAN - PRIVATE FORUM
http://scaredmonkeys.net/index.php?topic=4340.msg609289#msg609289



Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #789 1/1/09 -
Post by: Kermit on January 02, 2009, 07:00:26 PM
CAPS SAID

So like a said: in colombia they call those that make information up to confuse the issues of this case a SAPO.

FROM WIKI

Sapo is the Portuguese and Spanish term for a toad.

I believe CAPS is telling us that Kermie is deliberately making things up to confuse us.

 ::MonkeyEek::

BS kermit worked with two presidents brought down one.
NO WAY she is deliberately making things up to confuse us.
 I thinks it's Caps that's confusing us.
I also thinks he's more then one poster. JMO


This is a legit question, because statements like these have really caused me to question the motives of Kermit. What president did he/she bring down? Nixon? I thought it was Deepthroat who just passed away that brought down Nixon.

So Kermit brought down a president. And she/he single handily exposed the "Aruba cover-up". I know Klaas says she never said that but look up her posts, she claimed that here and on BFN. This really makes me think the motivation is about ego and not Natalee. I have seen several references to her taking down a president, is it something that can be substantiated?

Also Jen states that there are rumors floating that Jug knew the Persistence was first about oil, second about Natalee? Wow...is that her theory...whose theory? Just speculation or rumor? Those are some serious accusations imho.
It was at NH.Net in 2005.

You know ldstlou , you realy shouldn't be so rude, you don't know who Kermit is I do, and have for over three years now , plus she is a very nice  person.


Thank you Blonde.
You did not have to say anything and I respect you for saying that.
On a personal note, I do hope you are feeling better. You should be in bed resting.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #789 1/1/09 -
Post by: Anna on January 02, 2009, 07:00:56 PM

I stated that posters have said part of your credibility stems from taking down a president and working beside two others. I simply asked them to elaborate. You don't have to tell me a thing if you don't want to.


I thought you objected to things being stated in confidence then repeated elsewhere yet isn't this exactly what you are asking others to do to Kermit?

People are free to share their own personal information but we are not to divulge it about others.

You are asking others to violate confidence and yet that is your big gripe about what you perceive was done to Kyle.

And the difference is you are asking for personal information and Kyle was posting information about Natalee.  His information was relevant and what you are asking is not.

Why do you want personal information on Kermit?

.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #789 1/1/09 -
Post by: Kermit on January 02, 2009, 07:01:01 PM
BTW, Kermit thank you for your service to our country.

As well as doing all those TV shows with miss piggy and Gonzo,etc,etc..Don't know how you managed a dual career like that.... ::MonkeyDance:: ::MonkeyDance::

I have to run, but Keepthefaith, you crack me up!



Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #789 1/1/09 -
Post by: Keepthefaith on January 02, 2009, 07:02:36 PM
BTW, Kermit thank you for your service to our country.

As well as doing all those TV shows with miss piggy and Gonzo,etc,etc..Don't know how you managed a dual career like that.... ::MonkeyDance:: ::MonkeyDance::

I have to run, but Keepthefaith, you crack me up!



I stand with the Frog.Thank you.We'll be here.Have a great evening!


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #789 1/1/09 -
Post by: San on January 02, 2009, 07:04:44 PM
LDSTLOU - if Joran van der Sloot emailed me and confessed to Natalee dying and his disposing of her body, would it bother you if I posted the jest of that email in the forum?  Just so people could have a good idea what was sent to me?  Or would you think it more important to honor a private email and not tell anyone about it?

I don't see that Caps was posting any confession. Kermit says she is not allowed to post it and yet she posts it. And no, if I had an e-mail from Joran confessing I would not post it at SM, I would turn it over to the FBI who I am sure would tell me to keep my mouth shut about it and I would keep my mouth shut about it.

Which Kyle DID NOT do.  He posted on a private forum his concerns instead of giving the information to the FBI.

that is not true. All footage was turned over to the FBI. Do you wonder why JQK, Tim Miller, Dateline the FBI and the Family are not speaking out about the Persistence? Could it be because it was all done on the up and up? Kyle also asked that his posts not be made public. I believe Jen's letter said they sought legal advice and were told not to publish his posts...am I wrong?

From what i understand  it was about obstruction of justice.Correct me if i'm wrong Kermit!

according to whom? Not the FBI. The FBI do not have a problem with Kyle. In fact, they told him to ignore Kermit she was not important. She once again...posted that e-mail from Kyle to her...you all read it and ignored it.

Actually I took that comment to mean here is a quarter little boy now go away.

Kyle should not be so worried if he has the FBI on his side plain and simple but he seems to be in a big tizzy over this.  Does he not listent to the FBI's advice.

Dear Kyle,

If you are so confident as to what the FBI has told you then there are no worries.  Just let us simple people chit chat away and you continue with your life like nothing every happened.

Sincerely,

San
(The Nut)

I stand with the Frog.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #789 1/1/09 -
Post by: texasmom on January 02, 2009, 07:07:17 PM
(http://i302.photobucket.com/albums/nn82/texasmom_55/NataleeSoBeautifl.jpg)

JUSTICE FOR NATALEE!!!!!



THANK YOU KERMIT!    ::MonkeyDance::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #789 1/1/09 -
Post by: Anna on January 02, 2009, 07:09:04 PM
LDSTLOU - if Joran van der Sloot emailed me and confessed to Natalee dying and his disposing of her body, would it bother you if I posted the jest of that email in the forum?  Just so people could have a good idea what was sent to me?  Or would you think it more important to honor a private email and not tell anyone about it?

I don't see that Caps was posting any confession. Kermit says she is not allowed to post it and yet she posts it. And no, if I had an e-mail from Joran confessing I would not post it at SM, I would turn it over to the FBI who I am sure would tell me to keep my mouth shut about it and I would keep my mouth shut about it.

Which Kyle DID NOT do.  He posted on a private forum his concerns instead of giving the information to the FBI.

that is not true. All footage was turned over to the FBI. Do you wonder why JQK, Tim Miller, Dateline the FBI and the Family are not speaking out about the Persistence? Could it be because it was all done on the up and up? Kyle also asked that his posts not be made public. I believe Jen's letter said they sought legal advice and were told not to publish his posts...am I wrong?

From what i understand  it was about obstruction of justice.Correct me if i'm wrong Kermit!

according to whom? Not the FBI. The FBI do not have a problem with Kyle. In fact, they told him to ignore Kermit she was not important. She once again...posted that e-mail from Kyle to her...you all read it and ignored it.

Actually I took that comment to mean here is a quarter little boy now go away.

Kyle should not be so worried if he has the FBI on his side plain and simple but he seems to be in a big tizzy over this.  Does he not listent to the FBI's advice.

Dear Kyle,

If you are so confident as to what the FBI has told you then there are no worries.  Just let us simple people chit chat away and you continue with your life like nothing every happened.

Sincerely,

San
(The Nut)

I stand with the Frog.


I would have loved to have seen the expression of the FBI agent's face about somebody being worried about somebody named Kermit/Kermmie posting on an internet forum!

 ::MonkeyHaHa:: ::MonkeyDance:: ::MonkeyHaHa::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #789 1/1/09 -
Post by: Nut44x4 on January 02, 2009, 07:09:31 PM
Jane Valez Mullet Head is discussing Natalee. CNN Headline NEws


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #789 1/1/09 -
Post by: Keepthefaith on January 02, 2009, 07:10:12 PM
IT WOULD BE PRICELESS ANNA... ::MonkeyLaugh::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #789 1/1/09 -
Post by: 2NJSons_Mom on January 02, 2009, 07:11:25 PM
 ::MonkeyHaHa:: ::MonkeyHaHa::

San & Anna!

 :thumright:


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #789 1/1/09 -
Post by: texasmom on January 02, 2009, 07:11:54 PM
LDSTLOU - if Joran van der Sloot emailed me and confessed to Natalee dying and his disposing of her body, would it bother you if I posted the jest of that email in the forum?  Just so people could have a good idea what was sent to me?  Or would you think it more important to honor a private email and not tell anyone about it?

I don't see that Caps was posting any confession. Kermit says she is not allowed to post it and yet she posts it. And no, if I had an e-mail from Joran confessing I would not post it at SM, I would turn it over to the FBI who I am sure would tell me to keep my mouth shut about it and I would keep my mouth shut about it.

Which Kyle DID NOT do.  He posted on a private forum his concerns instead of giving the information to the FBI.

that is not true. All footage was turned over to the FBI. Do you wonder why JQK, Tim Miller, Dateline the FBI and the Family are not speaking out about the Persistence? Could it be because it was all done on the up and up? Kyle also asked that his posts not be made public. I believe Jen's letter said they sought legal advice and were told not to publish his posts...am I wrong?

From what i understand  it was about obstruction of justice.Correct me if i'm wrong Kermit!

according to whom? Not the FBI. The FBI do not have a problem with Kyle. In fact, they told him to ignore Kermit she was not important. She once again...posted that e-mail from Kyle to her...you all read it and ignored it.

Actually I took that comment to mean here is a quarter little boy now go away.

Kyle should not be so worried if he has the FBI on his side plain and simple but he seems to be in a big tizzy over this.  Does he not listent to the FBI's advice.

Dear Kyle,

If you are so confident as to what the FBI has told you then there are no worries.  Just let us simple people chit chat away and you continue with your life like nothing every happened.

Sincerely,

San
(The Nut)

I stand with the Frog.


I would have loved to have seen the expression of the FBI agent's face about somebody being worried about somebody named Kermit/Kermmie posting on an internet forum!

 ::MonkeyHaHa:: ::MonkeyDance:: ::MonkeyHaHa::
::MonkeyLaugh::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #789 1/1/09 -
Post by: 2NJSons_Mom on January 02, 2009, 07:14:02 PM
Jane Valez Mullet Head is discussing Natalee. CNN Headline NEws

Thanks, Nut. 


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #789 1/1/09 -
Post by: Anna on January 02, 2009, 07:14:29 PM
Jane Valez Mullet Head is discussing Natalee. CNN Headline NEws


Thanks, Nut!  I caught part of it.  Wendy Murphy saying she would prosecute even if she lost and the other person arguing that in this country we do always prosecute crimes against women when we know full well that is not true and Wendy is right!

Does this program repeat?  I would like to see all of that interesting discussion.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #789 1/1/09 -
Post by: San on January 02, 2009, 07:18:22 PM
Jane Valez Mullet Head is discussing Natalee. CNN Headline NEws


Thanks, Nut!  I caught part of it.  Wendy Murphy saying she would prosecute even if she lost and the other person arguing that in this country we do always prosecute crimes against women when we know full well that is not true and Wendy is right!

Does this program repeat?  I would like to see all of that interesting discussion.

This sounds like the show she did about a week or so ago.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #789 1/1/09 -
Post by: texasmom on January 02, 2009, 07:19:06 PM


Thanks Nut & Anna, wish I'd seen it too.



Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #789 1/1/09 -
Post by: MumInOhio on January 02, 2009, 07:25:49 PM
Mum ... back in May, 2008 ... you and I were on the same page in regards to CAPS ... the same page I have been on since CAPS made his initial appearance in the middle of January, 2008.

Somewhere along the line you jumped back on the CAPS bandwagon.  What changed?  It was not CAPS who changed.

Sincerely, Janet

+++++++

MumInOhio
Re: SHANGO/SIMIAN - who are they and what did they know? #3
« Reply #1412 on: May 06, 2008, 01:59:31 PM »


SS...I have read that as well...I have also read where he said it was other apartments, Dutch owned and not the Matty apartments. I am not going to go back to the first thread and find Cap's posts as I questioned him more than a couple of times as to why he changed his mind and he never answered!

He also didn't respond as to why he told me no to the Ind/Lion's Den in the first thread.

All that being said...he hasn't backed up his posts...just because Caps said it, doesn't make it so!

 I am sorry I don't mean to upset you, but you can post Caps posts forever and I will just keep telling you what he said previously.

I still want to know why he changed from the other apartments to the Matty and he will not answer!!!!!

http://scaredmonkeys.net/index.php?topic=2787.msg379364#msg379364


MumInOhio
Re: SHANGO/SIMIAN - who are they and what did they know? #3
« Reply #1424 on: May 06, 2008, 02:41:59 PM »


SS…let me ask you one question…

If I post the Freddy Zedan owns the Indo/Lion’s Den are you going to just take my word for it?

 Caps posts that the Kalpoes - the father or the stepfather, he never did answer which one, according to a girl there, now own it!

You can certainly take what Caps says without questions, but I will not. So please do not repost Caps post to me....Show me the proof!

 I have read everyone of Cap’s post at least three times…each day I type out an index…you would be very surprised what you see on the third read.

All I am trying to say is what you are posting from Caps is not what he said in January!

I am 99% sure as to why he switched to the Indo apartments…the answer is in one of your last few posts…and I will leave it at that!

And yes Lala’s…I am extremely frustrated…seems we have involved just about everyone on Aruba…new names are dropped every week.…I never see Joran’s name in this thread anymore!!!!!

And everytime Caps appears we have more questions!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

COLUMBO has a word for that!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

http://scaredmonkeys.net/index.php?topic=2787.msg379383#msg379383


MumInOhio
Re: SHANGO/SIMIAN - who are they and what did they know? #3
« Reply #1440 on: May 06, 2008, 06:42:17 PM »


Guess we will have to agree to disagree. I don't have to give him the benefit of the doubt just because he's Caps

All I see is a whole lot of new names and misinformation and very few facts...Giovanni, Deutekom, Bulo, Freddy that doesn't exist, odd-bods living at the kalpoes address, list of names that don't match the phone book...
 
Yes, something is going on at that pond, and we are still dealing with Aruba. I'm in total agreement with Lala's on this one, nothing will come of the pond.

http://scaredmonkeys.net/index.php?topic=2787.msg379502#msg379502


MumInOhio
Re: SHANGO/SIMIAN - who are they and what did they know? #3
« Reply #1450 on: May 06, 2008, 07:32:02 PM »


SS...A simple question as to if Deutekom was a Judge should have been answered 150 pages ago....so should the reason for him going back to the Indo/Lion's Den after he told me no to there. these are simple questions and both merit an answer!

I can't buy Cap's Dirty Hand Deutekom, because how he got to him was flawed. If he is not a Judge he wouldn't have been on that list. It is as simple as that!

There are more questions now than when Caps first started posting!

http://scaredmonkeys.net/index.php?topic=2787.msg379518#msg379518


MumInOhio
Re: SHANGO/SIMIAN - who are they and what did they know? #3
« Reply #1456 on: May 06, 2008, 11:11:21 PM »


Well I guess we are all frustrated today!

I attempted to explain to Caps at least 3 times the Judges list, and as one who tries to answer other poster’s questions, and acknowledge their posts I expected an answer on at least one of those occasions! If you have read my posts you would know that I have acknowledged that Deutekom may be a ‘Dirty Hand’ , just questioning the way he got there.

You can check my posts for this morning and see that I try to ‘share’ what I know! Have a look and see if my answer to another poster was even acknowledged!

I guess in your opinion it is OK for Caps to fire of all these questions at us, but he is not obligated to answer ours. Most of my questions to him have been about posts he has made and names like Bulo’s that we have never heard of. I have asked very few about things I am researching.

I have not asked any more from Caps than I would have asked from any other poster…back up your posts! BS on putting him in any sort of position! Not to the questions I have asked anyways.

Yes there are other theories on this thread, and I for one am sick and tired of having only one jammed down my throat.

I have read Caps posts many times and it is up to me if I go along with everything or anything he says.  Maybe it might help some if you let Caps know that it is creating problems by him dropping names with no other info….it would help a lot and certainly save some of us a lot of time….

JMHO

http://scaredmonkeys.net/index.php?topic=2787.msg379582#msg379582


MumInOhio
Re: SHANGO/SIMIAN - who are they and what did they know? #3
« Reply #1459 on: May 06, 2008, 11:33:41 PM »


*******…as you said this is a discussion forum and I have reason to question things in Caps posts! Most times when I have done so I do not receive an answer or if I do it is the post of Caps I am referring to posted back to me. Sorry … to me that is not discussion.

http://scaredmonkeys.net/index.php?topic=2787.msg379591#msg379591


MumInOhio
Re: SHANGO/SIMIAN - who are they and what did they know? #3
« Reply #1467 on: May 07, 2008, 08:06:50 AM »


SS...Caps started posting in the NAH thread around mid-January. Klaas explained at the time that he had been posting on the front page previously. After 4 or 5 days Caps started posting in the Shango thread. This would have been way back in the first thread.

http://scaredmonkeys.net/index.php?topic=2787.msg379694#msg379694


MumInOhio
Re: SHANGO/SIMIAN - who are they and what did they know? #3
« Reply #1468 on: May 07, 2008, 09:28:28 AM »


SS… You are right. I think Caps has information that has nothing to do with Shango as well. Caps does know the corruption and the ‘dark’ side of Aruba. He knows some of the players, probably a lot.

When Caps first started posting in the forum he knew very little about the case, or so it appears from his early posts. He asked us about the family, the friends, the private plane and the pimps. He asked about the suspects and about the people such as Julia and others that continually misinformed us. He needed our help and knowledge with these pieces of the puzzle. There is nothing wrong with that, I personally have spent a lot of time and posts sharing any information I had or could find.

A lot of time it seems to me that Caps has a piece that he feels fits into a Shango/Simian/Merian post, and just makes it fit. He has the player, the corrupt official, so that is the answer to that part of the riddle.

An example of this would be ‘the yellowhammer’. We started with a yellow hummer way back in the first thread, and most disagreed back then. When it was revisited recently and many posted that they thought it was the bird, Caps said OK, we’ll go with the bird, we’ll refine and correct any errors in his interpretations. The next day, Caps posts that he doesn’t think it is the bird. Our interpretation of ‘the yellowhammer’ doesn’t fit into Cap’s deciphering of the riddle.

I find this very frustrating. To me it is not that difficult.

Thanks everyone for the input on Bulo yesterday. Pita sorry for the confusion I may have caused on the Benz site. Somehow I confused myself…Vms…sounds like a good idea…maybe clear up some loose ends like Giovanni and Bulo…

 I think I need to go and sit in the grandstand with Lala’s and the other grannies for a day or two and go back to my own research.

http://scaredmonkeys.net/index.php?topic=2787.msg379700#msg379700


MumInOhio
Re: SHANGO/SIMIAN - who are they and what did they know? #3
« Reply #1493 on: May 08, 2008, 09:33:46 AM
»

This is a previous discussion about Ben VocKing. Below are 2 of Caps older posts regarding VocKing. So in February and March Caps knew who VocKing was, but not on April 25th.

Somewhere back around page 40 Caps posted a key in which he includes a pic of VocKing. You will notice that Caps refers to a picture of Voking in his response above.

Around pages 45 and 46 there is much discussion about the photo of VocKing and which is the correct one. The photo of VocKing that Caps included in his key and showed to the man who knew him very well is not of the person we determined to be VocKing.

This is why I ask questions…

<snipped>

http://scaredmonkeys.net/index.php?topic=2787.msg379920#msg379920


MumInOhio
Re: SHANGO/SIMIAN - who are they and what did they know? #3
« Reply #1494 on: May 08, 2008, 09:41:12 AM »


These posts of Caps have been etched in mind since March. Another reason I ask questions.

<snipped>

http://scaredmonkeys.net/index.php?topic=2787.msg379922#msg379922


MumInOhio
Re: SHANGO/SIMIAN - who are they and what did they know? #3
« Reply #1495 on: May 08, 2008, 10:12:11 AM »


Here is Cap's picture of Vocking.

Hotping...Thanks for the prayer. After the posts from last night, for the sake of harmony I have decided to refrain from posting in this thread any more.

Enjoy the Tango!

http://scaredmonkeys.net/index.php?topic=2787.msg379926#msg379926


MumInOhio
Re: SHANGO/SIMIAN - who are they and what did they know? #3
« Reply #1500 on: May 08, 2008, 11:55:52 AM »


Vms…I have suspected from very early on from Cap’s posts who Caps really is. I did not come to this conclusion from any mailing list from ‘our friend in Aruba’. Posts over the last 24 hours have confirmed my suspicions. Not everyone is whom they appear to be…I need to walk away!

http://scaredmonkeys.net/index.php?topic=2787.msg379938#msg379938


MumInOhio
Re: Natalee Case Discussion #750 5/2 -
« Reply #936 on: May 08, 2008, 08:30:49 PM »


SS…since you bought this over from the Shango thread….there is no group attack on Caps. I have asked him to answer questions about his posts. He has not done so, on most occasions IMO. I said this morning that I would walk away. I have.

Many of my questions regarding Caps surround Ben Vocking. I posted on that this morning. Please go back and read from page 39 to page 46 of the thread. Open the links. Read Caps response very carefully and then read what I posted this morning.

I am not going to respond any further on the subject.

http://scaredmonkeys.net/index.php?topic=2819.msg380072#msg380072


Janet...Respectfully...I answered this when you asked a little while back. I said then that you and I were never on exactly the same page. My research is ongoing. ::MonkeyWink::

Thank you for bringing my posts over from Shango. Hopefully it will help some to see that I ask questions when I am not satisfied with what has been posted or the answers that are given.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #789 1/1/09 -
Post by: MumInOhio on January 02, 2009, 07:28:12 PM
MumInOhio

I would appreciate it if you would go back to your little group and get your facts straight.

It was NOT ME who first posted the photo of the CMB bank next to Digicel.

The reason I know this is because I posted that photo at FREEBIRDS!

IT WAS DAYHIKER who took the photo from Freebirds and posted it here at SM[/b]

In addition:
If you are confused by truth, then you need to sit down and have it out with your group.
BECAUSE if you HAD, you would have known that it was me that was asked to BY THOSE
SPECIFIC members of your group to FIND OUT INFORMATION ON CAPS!

I do not recall posting Montanja 10.
If I did, please give me the link to my post.

I do recall posting Catrini 7.
Lalasmom, your group member not only continued to query me about it, but also emailed me asking me
why I posted it because it was near where CAPS lived! Which differed from the address that CAPS gave
to DAVE and the FBI!

Want me to post the email? I will be more then happy to do so.


Call it drive-bys or untruth or whatever word you want to come up with.

I DID THAT - FOR THEM

If you think for one minute that I can not back up and show the emails to prove what I am saying
 IS THE TRUTH - you are sorely mistaken.

Call me whatever names, insinuate whatever you want, but I have the proof.

Now, go find yourself someone else to slander.


Do not bother responding to me.
Do not bother apologizing to me.
You are forgiven.
But I won't respond to you ever again.





Kermit...

Excuse me...I am slandering You?

I questioned your posts. This is what I do. I ask questions. I want the details straight.  I questioned that address the very next morning after you first posted it in Shango.


Because I respected you and your posts I spent a lot of time and effort looking for a  connection to Freddy Zedan and 7A Catiri. I actually believed you when you posted that Frederick Arends was Freddy Zedan's father. Even after I found a social site for Frederick and his young son. I am sorry, but I do not recall what it was that made me change my mind and realize that what you had posted was incorrect.


You can be sure that I will ask Lalas about 7A Catiri. I will ask because I want the truth.


From your post this is what I see, please correct me if I am wrong...
 

You posted and reposted incorrect information at the request of another member of this Forum. Even though you knew this was incorrect information, you kept posting this address as belonging to Freddy Zedan.

Would you care to elaborate as to why you posted that Frederick Arends was Freddy Zedan's father.

Would you mind clarifying for myself and the others on this Forum how many times you have done this? This being posting incorrect information at the request of another Forum member.


Somehow, I do not think it is me that needs to be forgiven, Kermit.

And I do not think I am the one that needs to be making any apologies either.


Mum has an Agenda - Justice For Natalee
Is that the best you can do? Kermit may have given an incorrect address??

No wreck...first post on page 8 ::MonkeyNoNo::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #789 1/1/09 -
Post by: Tamikosmom on January 02, 2009, 07:35:03 PM

Janet...Respectfully...I answered this when you asked a little while back. I said then that you and I were never on exactly the same page. My research is ongoing. ::MonkeyWink::

Thank you for bringing my posts over from Shango. Hopefully it will help some to see that I ask questions when I am not satisfied with what has been posted or the answers that are given.

Mum ... in May, 2008 you had come to a conclusion and ... were not going to uphold CAPS.  You backed up ;your reasoning perfectly and ... I agreed.  Your reasoning was what I had claimed from the getgo ... two months prior.

Mum ... it is so important to me.  I want to know what changed your position.

Sincerely, Janet


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #789 1/1/09 -
Post by: Nut44x4 on January 02, 2009, 07:42:38 PM
Jane Valez Mullet Head is discussing Natalee. CNN Headline NEws


Thanks, Nut!  I caught part of it.  Wendy Murphy saying she would prosecute even if she lost and the other person arguing that in this country we do always prosecute crimes against women when we know full well that is not true and Wendy is right!

Does this program repeat?  I would like to see all of that interesting discussion.

I don't think you can watch it later like Greta and Nancy. That is really about all that was said. She went to break and came back talking about a diff. case.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #789 1/1/09 -
Post by: Tamikosmom on January 02, 2009, 07:57:33 PM
Nut ... would you please changed the year in my last post from 2009 to 2008.

I know ... I know ... it is only January 2, 2009 and ... I just broke my New Year Resolution which stated that I would not bother Klaas or the mods in regards to editing..

What can I say?

 ::MonkeyNoNo::

Thanks

Janet


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #789 1/1/09 -
Post by: Anna on January 02, 2009, 07:59:11 PM
Jane Valez Mullet Head is discussing Natalee. CNN Headline NEws


Thanks, Nut!  I caught part of it.  Wendy Murphy saying she would prosecute even if she lost and the other person arguing that in this country we do always prosecute crimes against women when we know full well that is not true and Wendy is right!

Does this program repeat?  I would like to see all of that interesting discussion.

I don't think you can watch it later like Greta and Nancy. That is really about all that was said. She went to break and came back talking about a diff. case.

No, I don't see it listed later.  Wendy Murphy seems to be on a crusade to have crimes against women considered as hate crimes which is what it might take to stop this epidemic of them.  I really like to hear Wendy,  Dana has her on often.

.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #789 1/1/09 -
Post by: MumInOhio on January 02, 2009, 08:06:23 PM

Janet...Respectfully...I answered this when you asked a little while back. I said then that you and I were never on exactly the same page. My research is ongoing. ::MonkeyWink::

Thank you for bringing my posts over from Shango. Hopefully it will help some to see that I ask questions when I am not satisfied with what has been posted or the answers that are given.

Mum ... in May, 2008 you had come to a conclusion and ... were not going to uphold CAPS.  You backed up ;your reasoning perfectly and ... I agreed.  Your reasoning was what I had claimed from the getgo ... two months prior.

Mum ... it is so important to me.  I want to know what changed your position.

Sincerely, Janet

Janet...You are like a pitbull...LOL

Nobody knows my position on this at this time...I am not ready to elaborate any more...I am Sorry.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #789 1/1/09 -
Post by: Keepthefaith on January 02, 2009, 08:06:34 PM
CapsLockWizard
"Just watch this week for the arrest of a major player of the game...and probably a big strike in the making and uproar in the house of Babylon."

Who is to be arrested?how will it impact the investigation?Will this be political with no implications on the holloway case?I guess this week will tell... ::MonkeyConfused::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #789 1/1/09 -
Post by: Tamikosmom on January 02, 2009, 08:14:25 PM

Janet...Respectfully...I answered this when you asked a little while back. I said then that you and I were never on exactly the same page. My research is ongoing. ::MonkeyWink::

Thank you for bringing my posts over from Shango. Hopefully it will help some to see that I ask questions when I am not satisfied with what has been posted or the answers that are given.

Mum ... in May, 2008 you had come to a conclusion and ... were not going to uphold CAPS.  You backed up ;your reasoning perfectly and ... I agreed.  Your reasoning was what I had claimed from the getgo ... two months prior.

Mum ... it is so important to me.  I want to know what changed your position.

Sincerely, Janet

Janet...You are like a pitbull...LOL

Nobody knows my position on this at this time...I am not ready to elaborate any more...I am Sorry.

 ::MonkeyWaa::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #789 1/1/09 -
Post by: wreck on January 02, 2009, 08:19:14 PM
CapsLockWizard
"Just watch this week for the arrest of a major player of the game...and probably a big strike in the making and uproar in the house of Babylon."

Who is to be arrested?how will it impact the investigation?Will this be political with no implications on the holloway case?I guess this week will tell... ::MonkeyConfused::
Babylon?? Is Caps Shango and/or Simian??? Just questons, just questions.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #789 1/1/09 -
Post by: Keepthefaith on January 02, 2009, 08:19:19 PM
O/T.I don't like the Oregon Ducks either Wreck! ::MonkeyDance::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #789 1/1/09 -
Post by: 2NJSons_Mom on January 02, 2009, 08:20:22 PM
CapsLockWizard
"Just watch this week for the arrest of a major player of the game...and probably a big strike in the making and uproar in the house of Babylon."

Who is to be arrested?how will it impact the investigation?Will this be political with no implications on the holloway case?I guess this week will tell... ::MonkeyConfused::

Yes, and as I posted earlier, since Caps announced it here, is the major player now aware that it is imminent?   ::MonkeyShocked::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #789 1/1/09 -
Post by: Nut44x4 on January 02, 2009, 08:21:12 PM
oops...sorry Janet...I was watching Nancy, lol.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #789 1/1/09 -
Post by: Anna on January 02, 2009, 08:27:13 PM
No Sloot, no Justice. 


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #789 1/1/09 -
Post by: wreck on January 02, 2009, 08:44:36 PM
CapsLockWizard
"Just watch this week for the arrest of a major player of the game...and probably a big strike in the making and uproar in the house of Babylon."

Who is to be arrested?how will it impact the investigation?Will this be political with no implications on the holloway case?I guess this week will tell... ::MonkeyConfused::
Babylon?? Is Caps Shango and/or Simian??? Just questons, just questions.

^^^BUMP^^^^

Is it because no one wants to comment or can no one reveal Caps identity?


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #789 1/1/09 -
Post by: Keepthefaith on January 02, 2009, 08:45:39 PM
CapsLockWizard
"Just watch this week for the arrest of a major player of the game...and probably a big strike in the making and uproar in the house of Babylon."

Who is to be arrested?how will it impact the investigation?Will this be political with no implications on the holloway case?I guess this week will tell... ::MonkeyConfused::
Babylon?? Is Caps Shango and/or Simian??? Just questons, just questions.

^^^BUMP^^^^

Is it because no one wants to comment or can no one reveal Caps identity?

I wish i knew.I would have told you yesterday.. ::MonkeyDance::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #789 1/1/09 -
Post by: Keepthefaith on January 02, 2009, 08:51:06 PM
I'm just spinning my wheels wondering who they could possible arrest that would make a difference in this case?Who?Throw a Nanner at  the wall and see if it sticks ::MonkeyDance::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #789 1/1/09 -
Post by: Keepthefaith on January 02, 2009, 08:52:18 PM
Anything on The Mansur's,Croes,Oduber's or Maybe the Wever's Truthseeker2?


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #789 1/1/09 -
Post by: Ree on January 02, 2009, 08:54:33 PM
Maybe I'm reading too much into Kermie's post, but don't she and CAPS seems to agree that something is about to happen soon?


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #789 1/1/09 -
Post by: San on January 02, 2009, 08:55:44 PM
CapsLockWizard
"Just watch this week for the arrest of a major player of the game...and probably a big strike in the making and uproar in the house of Babylon."

Who is to be arrested?how will it impact the investigation?Will this be political with no implications on the holloway case?I guess this week will tell... ::MonkeyConfused::
Babylon?? Is Caps Shango and/or Simian??? Just questons, just questions.

^^^BUMP^^^^

Is it because no one wants to comment or can no one reveal Caps identity?

I have no desire to know Caps identity.  Nor should anyone post his real name.  If he hasn't divulged that information it is probably for his own safety and that is fine.

With that said I believe who I want to believe and I don't need to know who the person is.  Kyle put himself out there for everyone to know.  Kermit has given us hints as to what her background is.

I don't need to know their name to make a decision on who I believe.  JMO.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #789 1/1/09 -
Post by: truthseeker2 on January 02, 2009, 08:56:36 PM
Anything on The Mansur's,Croes,Oduber's or Maybe the Wever's Truthseeker2?

Mansurs and Croes'...interesting possibilities.

Odubers and Wevers...not so much.

The more I delve into the Mansurs, the less certain I am they have anything other than helping the family in mind.  This is a change of direction for me.  I would like to hear from Eduardo about that time he spent on the ocean search if Dana could convince him to come on one of his shows.

The problem with working on Croes'...there's so deadgum many of them.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #789 1/1/09 -
Post by: hotping on January 02, 2009, 08:57:00 PM
Maybe I'm reading too much into Kermie's post, but don't she and CAPS seems to agree that something is about to happen soon?
Ree...That's the way I read it.....soon want be soon enough....lol  ::cartwheel::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #789 1/1/09 -
Post by: Keepthefaith on January 02, 2009, 08:57:26 PM
Maybe I'm reading too much into Kermie's post, but don't she and CAPS seems to agree that something is about to happen soon?

We shall see!This is where i'm stuck.Follow the money........Truthseeker2


Arlene Ellis-Schipper is a board of directors for CMB bank http://www.cmbnv.com/directors.php
* Paulus van der Sloot went to the CMB bank twice the day after Natalee was kidnapped by his son
* Lincoln Gomez and Nilo Swean are financial guys on the boards of these banks
(I'm going to add to this original post that the banks are significant to follow the money)
http://scaredmonkeys.net/index.php?topic=4186.520



Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #789 1/1/09 -
Post by: Blue Moon on January 02, 2009, 08:57:55 PM
Maybe I'm reading too much into Kermie's post, but don't she and CAPS seems to agree that something is about to happen soon?

Yes, I do believe they both agree on the one thing.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #789 1/1/09 -
Post by: hotping on January 02, 2009, 08:59:10 PM
CapsLockWizard
"Just watch this week for the arrest of a major player of the game...and probably a big strike in the making and uproar in the house of Babylon."

Who is to be arrested?how will it impact the investigation?Will this be political with no implications on the holloway case?I guess this week will tell... ::MonkeyConfused::
Babylon?? Is Caps Shango and/or Simian??? Just questons, just questions.

^^^BUMP^^^^

Is it because no one wants to comment or can no one reveal Caps identity?

I have no desire to know Caps identity.  Nor should anyone post his real name.  If he hasn't divulged that information it is probably for his own safety and that is fine.

With that said I believe who I want to believe and I don't need to know who the person is.  Kyle put himself out there for everyone to know.  Kermit has given us hints as to what her background is.

I don't need to know their name to make a decision on who I believe.  JMO.
I Agree San!  ::MonkeyCool::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #789 1/1/09 -
Post by: wreck on January 02, 2009, 09:01:50 PM
CapsLockWizard
"Just watch this week for the arrest of a major player of the game...and probably a big strike in the making and uproar in the house of Babylon."

Who is to be arrested?how will it impact the investigation?Will this be political with no implications on the holloway case?I guess this week will tell... ::MonkeyConfused::
Babylon?? Is Caps Shango and/or Simian??? Just questons, just questions.

^^^BUMP^^^^

Is it because no one wants to comment or can no one reveal Caps identity?

I have no desire to know Caps identity.  Nor should anyone post his real name.  If he hasn't divulged that information it is probably for his own safety and that is fine.

With that said I believe who I want to believe and I don't need to know who the person is.  Kyle put himself out there for everyone to know.  Kermit has given us hints as to what her background is.

I don't need to know their name to make a decision on who I believe.  JMO.
I know!!  ::MonkeyHaHa:: But it sure would go a long ways to know how credible he is. IF he is one of the forementioned -- there will be NO credance given from me what so ever.  ::MonkeyNoNo::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #789 1/1/09 -
Post by: AZSunny on January 02, 2009, 09:02:59 PM
Posts and posters rise and fall on the credibility of their posting only.  I don't believe that personal biographical information about a particular poster is necessary for people to determine the validity of what they post.

That said, isn't posting personal information about other posters against the forum rules?



Yes.  Sometimes posters volunteer personal information and then of course it's OK.  But otherwise personal information about posters is nobody's business.

ok...I have seen it posted several times that kermit took down a president, and that has been part of her credibilty for some it seems. Am I then allowed to ask what president and how? jeez.

I don't see where I directed my comment to you but I'll respond anyway.  You can ask all you want but it's inappropriate and don't expect an answer.

Personally, whether a person "took down" a president or not makes no difference to me.  It does not change how I feel about Kermit or Caps or anyone else.

posters keep posting this comment in reference to kermit's credibility. Why can't I ask about it then?

LDSlou,  I have to be honest with you, I am definitely questioning your credibility.  What is your mission, and why? Your are being very antigonistic towards everyone, in my opinion. You will not entertain anyone elses opinions/ or read to form your own opinions.You  appear to just want to argue.  how sad.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #789 1/1/09 -
Post by: bastibro on January 02, 2009, 09:03:17 PM
I hope they arrest this POS! He has a lot to hide IMO

(http://i272.photobucket.com/albums/jj176/bastibro/Suspects%20NH%20case/Lorenzo_pics.jpg)


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #789 1/1/09 -
Post by: San on January 02, 2009, 09:06:31 PM
I hope they arrest this POS! He has a lot to hide IMO

(http://i272.photobucket.com/albums/jj176/bastibro/Suspects%20NH%20case/Lorenzo_pics.jpg)


You are correct.  He is a big POS just like his POS family.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #789 1/1/09 -
Post by: AZSunny on January 02, 2009, 09:06:55 PM
Forgive me, but these same questions go on for pages...where is the Ignore button? 

 :gaah:


YES!!!  Please..,.can I have mine back????????


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #789 1/1/09 -
Post by: Red on January 02, 2009, 09:08:07 PM
Gee, what are the odds that Greta is in Aruba?

Let's ask the Magic 8 Ball ... Outlook good

Looks like there may be some action taking place in the NH case ... the moons are starting to align.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #789 1/1/09 -
Post by: klaasend on January 02, 2009, 09:08:42 PM
I hope they arrest this POS! He has a lot to hide IMO

(http://i272.photobucket.com/albums/jj176/bastibro/Suspects%20NH%20case/Lorenzo_pics.jpg)


Bastibro - I agree and not JUST in the NH case. 


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #789 1/1/09 -
Post by: truthseeker2 on January 02, 2009, 09:09:19 PM
Maybe I'm reading too much into Kermie's post, but don't she and CAPS seems to agree that something is about to happen soon?

We shall see!This is where i'm stuck.Follow the money........Truthseeker2


Arlene Ellis-Schipper is a board of directors for CMB bank http://www.cmbnv.com/directors.php
* Paulus van der Sloot went to the CMB bank twice the day after Natalee was kidnapped by his son
* Lincoln Gomez and Nilo Swean are financial guys on the boards of these banks
(I'm going to add to this original post that the banks are significant to follow the money)
http://scaredmonkeys.net/index.php?topic=4186.520


Yes, I know.  And isn't Arlene related to Guido in some way?

The amount of money that Paulus actually deposited, it any, will never be known I think.  I doubt whoever is actually financing Joran's travels will be overtly connected to Paulus.  That would be too obvious.  But I was a bit intrigued during Joran's last interview with Greta when he was telling his story about selling Natalee.  He mentioned that this mystery guy with the bag of money was paying him $ 10,000.  Then he says the amount was short by $400 and the guy must have taken some for himself.  The amount this mystery guy took made me curious because of what I had read in the statement of Andre Dos Santos about how Joran, on May 30, had won about $400 and 'immediately' cashed in his chips.

Unless you are in any way interested in the possibilty that human trafficking involved..that may not interest you too much.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #789 1/1/09 -
Post by: klaasend on January 02, 2009, 09:09:59 PM
Gee, what are the odds that Greta is in Aruba?

Let's ask the Magic 8 Ball ... Outlook good

Looks like there may be some action taking place in the NH case ... the moons are starting to align.

I sure hope so!


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #789 1/1/09 -
Post by: Keepthefaith on January 02, 2009, 09:11:16 PM
Gee, what are the odds that Greta is in Aruba?

Let's ask the Magic 8 Ball ... Outlook good

Looks like there may be some action taking place in the NH case ... the moons are starting to align.

Will this really have any significance or is it gonna be another Dog and pony show?


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #789 1/1/09 -
Post by: hotping on January 02, 2009, 09:11:36 PM
Gee, what are the odds that Greta is in Aruba?

Let's ask the Magic 8 Ball ... Outlook good

Looks like there may be some action taking place in the NH case ... the moons are starting to align.
OMG...Thank You Red.....  ::cartwheel:: Bless You for sharing this with Us!  ::cartwheel::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #789 1/1/09 -
Post by: truthseeker2 on January 02, 2009, 09:12:06 PM
I hope they arrest this POS! He has a lot to hide IMO

(http://i272.photobucket.com/albums/jj176/bastibro/Suspects%20NH%20case/Lorenzo_pics.jpg)


I just can't help but think of Popeye when I see that bottom pic.  (Looks like he missed a few helpings of spinach, though)


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #789 1/1/09 -
Post by: Keepthefaith on January 02, 2009, 09:13:47 PM
Maybe I'm reading too much into Kermie's post, but don't she and CAPS seems to agree that something is about to happen soon?

We shall see!This is where i'm stuck.Follow the money........Truthseeker2


Arlene Ellis-Schipper is a board of directors for CMB bank http://www.cmbnv.com/directors.php
* Paulus van der Sloot went to the CMB bank twice the day after Natalee was kidnapped by his son
* Lincoln Gomez and Nilo Swean are financial guys on the boards of these banks
(I'm going to add to this original post that the banks are significant to follow the money)
http://scaredmonkeys.net/index.php?topic=4186.520


Yes, I know.  And isn't Arlene related to Guido in some way?

The amount of money that Paulus actually deposited, it any, will never be known I think.  I doubt whoever is actually financing Joran's travels will be overtly connected to Paulus.  That would be too obvious.  But I was a bit intrigued during Joran's last interview with Greta when he was telling his story about selling Natalee.  He mentioned that this mystery guy with the bag of money was paying him $ 10,000.  Then he says the amount was short by $400 and the guy must have taken some for himself.  The amount this mystery guy took made me curious because of what I had read in the statement of Andre Dos Santos about how Joran, on May 30, had won about $400 and 'immediately' cashed in his chips.

Unless you are in any way interested in the possibilty that human trafficking involved..that may not interest you too much.

Remember Rob said Tj Ward gave tapes to Greta in terms of Colombians and Paulus if i'm not mistaken?


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #789 1/1/09 -
Post by: bastibro on January 02, 2009, 09:14:05 PM
Gee, what are the odds that Greta is in Aruba?

Let's ask the Magic 8 Ball ... Outlook good

Looks like there may be some action taking place in the NH case ... the moons are starting to align.

Will this really have any significance or is it gonna be another Dog and pony show?

Hope does give life KTF ::MonkeyWink::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #789 1/1/09 -
Post by: hotping on January 02, 2009, 09:14:28 PM
I hope they arrest this POS! He has a lot to hide IMO

(http://i272.photobucket.com/albums/jj176/bastibro/Suspects%20NH%20case/Lorenzo_pics.jpg)


I just can't help but think of Popeye when I see that bottom pic.  (Looks like he missed a few helpings of spinach, though)
::MonkeyHaHa:: ::MonkeyHaHa::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #789 1/1/09 -
Post by: wreck on January 02, 2009, 09:15:12 PM
I hope they arrest this POS! He has a lot to hide IMO

(http://i272.photobucket.com/albums/jj176/bastibro/Suspects%20NH%20case/Lorenzo_pics.jpg)


Bastibro - I agree and not JUST in the NH case. 
I've seen him before.....

(http://www.math.pitt.edu/~bard/bardware/popeye/popeye_half.gif)


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #789 1/1/09 -
Post by: truthseeker2 on January 02, 2009, 09:18:11 PM
Maybe I'm reading too much into Kermie's post, but don't she and CAPS seems to agree that something is about to happen soon?

We shall see!This is where i'm stuck.Follow the money........Truthseeker2


Arlene Ellis-Schipper is a board of directors for CMB bank http://www.cmbnv.com/directors.php
* Paulus van der Sloot went to the CMB bank twice the day after Natalee was kidnapped by his son
* Lincoln Gomez and Nilo Swean are financial guys on the boards of these banks
(I'm going to add to this original post that the banks are significant to follow the money)
http://scaredmonkeys.net/index.php?topic=4186.520


Yes, I know.  And isn't Arlene related to Guido in some way?

The amount of money that Paulus actually deposited, it any, will never be known I think.  I doubt whoever is actually financing Joran's travels will be overtly connected to Paulus.  That would be too obvious.  But I was a bit intrigued during Joran's last interview with Greta when he was telling his story about selling Natalee.  He mentioned that this mystery guy with the bag of money was paying him $ 10,000.  Then he says the amount was short by $400 and the guy must have taken some for himself.  The amount this mystery guy took made me curious because of what I had read in the statement of Andre Dos Santos about how Joran, on May 30, had won about $400 and 'immediately' cashed in his chips.

Unless you are in any way interested in the possibilty that human trafficking involved..that may not interest you too much.

Remember Rob said Tj Ward gave tapes to Greta in terms of Colombians and Paulus if i'm not mistaken?

Yeah, and I keep waiting to hear those tapes.

You are aware that Jaime made a trip over to the Wyndham around 11:00 pm on 5/30/05...just as Andre says Joran and Guido walked 'outside'?????????


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #789 1/1/09 -
Post by: 2NJSons_Mom on January 02, 2009, 09:18:19 PM
Gee, what are the odds that Greta is in Aruba?

Let's ask the Magic 8 Ball ... Outlook good

Looks like there may be some action taking place in the NH case ... the moons are starting to align.

There's that 8 ball, again.   ::MonkeyHaHa::

I just had a visual of a bus with....nevermind....

I sincerely hope something good happens for a change.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #789 1/1/09 -
Post by: hotping on January 02, 2009, 09:18:42 PM
Red....Does Your Magic 8 Ball have anything else to say?  ::MonkeyWink::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #789 1/1/09 -
Post by: truthseeker2 on January 02, 2009, 09:19:59 PM
I hope they arrest this POS! He has a lot to hide IMO

(http://i272.photobucket.com/albums/jj176/bastibro/Suspects%20NH%20case/Lorenzo_pics.jpg)


Bastibro - I agree and not JUST in the NH case. 
I've seen him before.....

(http://www.math.pitt.edu/~bard/bardware/popeye/popeye_half.gif)

 ::MonkeyLaugh::

Lorenzo does seem to have his look, doesn't he!  Too bad he is not nearly as honorable as Popeye.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #789 1/1/09 -
Post by: Keepthefaith on January 02, 2009, 09:22:00 PM
Gee, what are the odds that Greta is in Aruba?

Let's ask the Magic 8 Ball ... Outlook good

Looks like there may be some action taking place in the NH case ... the moons are starting to align.

Will this really have any significance or is it gonna be another Dog and pony show?

Hope does give life KTF ::MonkeyWink::

I pray,pray,pray....... ::MonkeyCool::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #789 1/1/09 -
Post by: bastibro on January 02, 2009, 09:22:57 PM
(http://i272.photobucket.com/albums/jj176/bastibro/Suspects%20NH%20case/Lorenzo_pics-1.jpg)(http://i272.photobucket.com/albums/jj176/bastibro/Suspects%20NH%20case/popeye-1.jpg)

ROFL ::MonkeyLaugh::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #789 1/1/09 -
Post by: hotping on January 02, 2009, 09:24:13 PM
Gee, what are the odds that Greta is in Aruba?

Let's ask the Magic 8 Ball ... Outlook good

Looks like there may be some action taking place in the NH case ... the moons are starting to align.

Will this really have any significance or is it gonna be another Dog and pony show?

Hope does give life KTF ::MonkeyWink::

I pray,pray,pray....... ::MonkeyCool::
I'm praying with You KTF!  ::MonkeyWink::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #789 1/1/09 -
Post by: truthseeker2 on January 02, 2009, 09:24:21 PM
(http://i272.photobucket.com/albums/jj176/bastibro/Suspects%20NH%20case/Lorenzo_pics-1.jpg)(http://i272.photobucket.com/albums/jj176/bastibro/Suspects%20NH%20case/popeye-1.jpg)

ROFL ::MonkeyLaugh::

 ::MonkeyLaugh:: ::MonkeyLaugh:: ::MonkeyLaugh::

Nice work, bastibro!


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #789 1/1/09 -
Post by: KYcat on January 02, 2009, 09:25:55 PM
I'm back..............  ::MonkeyTongue::

Does anyone remember an earlier post by Kermit regarding "follow the money"????

It was back when we were discussing the crabtrap and the search of the Persistence.  We were discussing Silvetti and Schaufer?

I, as others here, did some research on them and found some interesting information regarding their finances, etc.  Does anyone know if there is a link between them and the CMB bank?

 


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #789 1/1/09 -
Post by: Blue Moon on January 02, 2009, 09:27:56 PM
I hope they arrest this POS! He has a lot to hide IMO

(http://i272.photobucket.com/albums/jj176/bastibro/Suspects%20NH%20case/Lorenzo_pics.jpg)


I'm with you on that but I would rather see his half-brother Joran and his POS father Paulus get it first.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #789 1/1/09 -
Post by: klaasend on January 02, 2009, 09:28:37 PM
http://www.magic8ball.midnightfun.co.uk/8ball.php

Will there be justice in Aruba?

(http://i118.photobucket.com/albums/o100/klaasen3/Sub5/8ball.jpg)


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #789 1/1/09 -
Post by: Keepthefaith on January 02, 2009, 09:29:33 PM
I'm back..............  ::MonkeyTongue::

Does anyone remember an earlier post by Kermit regarding "follow the money"????

It was back when we were discussing the crabtrap and the search of the Persistence.  We were discussing Silvetti and Schaufer?

I, as others here, did some research on them and found some interesting information regarding their finances, etc.  Does anyone know if there is a link between them and the CMB bank?

 

Arlene Ellis-Schipper is a board of directors for CMB bank http://www.cmbnv.com/directors.php
* Paulus van der Sloot went to the CMB bank twice the day after Natalee was kidnapped by his son
* Lincoln Gomez and Nilo Swean are financial guys on the boards of these banks
(I'm going to add to this original post that the banks are significant to follow the money)
http://scaredmonkeys.net/index.php?topic=4186.520


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #789 1/1/09 -
Post by: klaasend on January 02, 2009, 09:30:00 PM
I'm back..............  ::MonkeyTongue::

Does anyone remember an earlier post by Kermit regarding "follow the money"????

It was back when we were discussing the crabtrap and the search of the Persistence.  We were discussing Silvetti and Schaufer?

I, as others here, did some research on them and found some interesting information regarding their finances, etc.  Does anyone know if there is a link between them and the CMB bank?

 

KYCat - I don't remember seeing any connection between Silvetti and CMB bank.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #789 1/1/09 -
Post by: Blue Moon on January 02, 2009, 09:30:26 PM
Gee, what are the odds that Greta is in Aruba?

Let's ask the Magic 8 Ball ... Outlook good

Looks like there may be some action taking place in the NH case ... the moons are starting to align.

Don't tease us Red, SPIT IT OUT.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #789 1/1/09 -
Post by: bastibro on January 02, 2009, 09:33:46 PM
(http://i272.photobucket.com/albums/jj176/bastibro/Suspects%20NH%20case/Lorenzo_pics-1.jpg)(http://i272.photobucket.com/albums/jj176/bastibro/Suspects%20NH%20case/popeye-1.jpg)

ROFL ::MonkeyLaugh::

 ::MonkeyLaugh:: ::MonkeyLaugh:: ::MonkeyLaugh::

Nice work, bastibro!

And instead of spinach he prefers these . . (http://i272.photobucket.com/albums/jj176/bastibro/vdSloot/jORANjOINTS1-1.jpg)


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #789 1/1/09 -
Post by: KYcat on January 02, 2009, 09:33:47 PM
I'm back..............  ::MonkeyTongue::

Does anyone remember an earlier post by Kermit regarding "follow the money"????

It was back when we were discussing the crabtrap and the search of the Persistence.  We were discussing Silvetti and Schaufer?

I, as others here, did some research on them and found some interesting information regarding their finances, etc.  Does anyone know if there is a link between them and the CMB bank?

 

KYCat - I don't remember seeing any connection between Silvetti and CMB bank.

Me either.  I was just trying to find one!   ::MonkeyShocked::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #789 1/1/09 -
Post by: Keepthefaith on January 02, 2009, 09:34:48 PM
Maybe I'm reading too much into Kermie's post, but don't she and CAPS seems to agree that something is about to happen soon?

We shall see!This is where i'm stuck.Follow the money........Truthseeker2


Arlene Ellis-Schipper is a board of directors for CMB bank http://www.cmbnv.com/directors.php
* Paulus van der Sloot went to the CMB bank twice the day after Natalee was kidnapped by his son
* Lincoln Gomez and Nilo Swean are financial guys on the boards of these banks
(I'm going to add to this original post that the banks are significant to follow the money)
http://scaredmonkeys.net/index.php?topic=4186.520


Yes, I know.  And isn't Arlene related to Guido in some way?

The amount of money that Paulus actually deposited, it any, will never be known I think.  I doubt whoever is actually financing Joran's travels will be overtly connected to Paulus.  That would be too obvious.  But I was a bit intrigued during Joran's last interview with Greta when he was telling his story about selling Natalee.  He mentioned that this mystery guy with the bag of money was paying him $ 10,000.  Then he says the amount was short by $400 and the guy must have taken some for himself.  The amount this mystery guy took made me curious because of what I had read in the statement of Andre Dos Santos about how Joran, on May 30, had won about $400 and 'immediately' cashed in his chips.

Unless you are in any way interested in the possibilty that human trafficking involved..that may not interest you too much.

Remember Rob said Tj Ward gave tapes to Greta in terms of Colombians and Paulus if i'm not mistaken?

Yeah, and I keep waiting to hear those tapes.

You are aware that Jaime made a trip over to the Wyndham around 11:00 pm on 5/30/05...just as Andre says Joran and Guido walked 'outside'?????????

And Jaime lineage is from where?


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #789 1/1/09 -
Post by: klaasend on January 02, 2009, 09:35:29 PM
Gee, what are the odds that Greta is in Aruba?

Let's ask the Magic 8 Ball ... Outlook good

Looks like there may be some action taking place in the NH case ... the moons are starting to align.

Don't tease us Red, SPIT IT OUT.

We know that JQK said he was going to attempt to meet up with Brinkman in Aruba.  I wouldn't be surprised if Greta didn't go as well.  The big question is, is there something about to happen??  I want to know too!


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #789 1/1/09 -
Post by: truthseeker2 on January 02, 2009, 09:35:30 PM
(http://i272.photobucket.com/albums/jj176/bastibro/Suspects%20NH%20case/Lorenzo_pics-1.jpg)(http://i272.photobucket.com/albums/jj176/bastibro/Suspects%20NH%20case/popeye-1.jpg)

ROFL ::MonkeyLaugh::

 ::MonkeyLaugh:: ::MonkeyLaugh:: ::MonkeyLaugh::

Nice work, bastibro!

And instead of spinach he prefers these . . (http://i272.photobucket.com/albums/jj176/bastibro/vdSloot/jORANjOINTS1-1.jpg)

 ::MonkeyLaugh:: ::MonkeyLaugh::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #789 1/1/09 -
Post by: truthseeker2 on January 02, 2009, 09:36:20 PM

Yeah, and I keep waiting to hear those tapes.

You are aware that Jaime made a trip over to the Wyndham around 11:00 pm on 5/30/05...just as Andre says Joran and Guido walked 'outside'?????????

And Jaime lineage is from where?

Why, Colombia, of course.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #789 1/1/09 -
Post by: ldstlou on January 02, 2009, 09:36:31 PM
LDSTLOU - if Joran van der Sloot emailed me and confessed to Natalee dying and his disposing of her body, would it bother you if I posted the jest of that email in the forum?  Just so people could have a good idea what was sent to me?  Or would you think it more important to honor a private email and not tell anyone about it?

I don't see that Caps was posting any confession. Kermit says she is not allowed to post it and yet she posts it. And no, if I had an e-mail from Joran confessing I would not post it at SM, I would turn it over to the FBI who I am sure would tell me to keep my mouth shut about it and I would keep my mouth shut about it.

Which Kyle DID NOT do.  He posted on a private forum his concerns instead of giving the information to the FBI.

that is not true. All footage was turned over to the FBI. Do you wonder why JQK, Tim Miller, Dateline the FBI and the Family are not speaking out about the Persistence? Could it be because it was all done on the up and up? Kyle also asked that his posts not be made public. I believe Jen's letter said they sought legal advice and were told not to publish his posts...am I wrong?

Yes, I believe you are WRONG:

1.  From Kermit's and Kyle's posts the information was turned over to the FBI and JQK because neither Kyle or John Silvetti did.

2.  I believe Jen stated they were told to stay away from Kyle, nothing about NOT publishing his posts.  I think it was Kyle that threatened people if they published them.

The footage WAS turned over to the FBI immediately. You do our FBI a disservice imho by thinking they walked away without it.

Jen also stated I believe, that they had compiled their findings, when Kyle came back he asked that they not post the piece they had put together because they had taken speculation and turned it into facts and had taken his words out of context. So why haven't the Freebirds published the material that Kermit brought here to SM? Why the need to leave the Freebirds to post the material? Am I wrong and the Freebirds are publishing their findings on the Persistence?




Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #789 1/1/09 -
Post by: klaasend on January 02, 2009, 09:36:39 PM
Keepthefaith   - Jaime's family from Columbia and I believe Jaime was born there.

http://scaredmonkeys.net/index.php?topic=197.0

PROCES-VERBAAL

We, Luigi Angelo Giovanni CROES and Dennis Dominico JACOBS, respectively officer first class and head officer, with the Korps Politie Aruba, first mentioned officer is attacked to the Section Often Occurring Crimes district II and the latter with the Robbery Project team (Atraco team), declare the following.

On June 17th 2005, approximately 13.50 hours, we the reporting officers, interviewed as a witness the man named:

Jaime Alberto CARRASQUILIA CACERES, born in Columbia on April 25 1985, E.P.I.(Sector Economico) and living xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx on Aruba.

His statement goes as follows.

"My friends and acquaintances call me "Beto". I have known Joran since August 2004. Through the man named "Freddy Zedan" I met with Joran. One day I went to Joran's house with Freddy and since then we kept in contact. Usually Joran, Freddy, Koen, Sander and me go out together. Joran's nickname is "Jojo", Freddy's nickname is "Fefi", Koen's nickname is "Cul" and Sander's nickname is "Nepi". The places we usually go out to are "Carlos & Charlies", "Bahia", Tandra", "Cinema" and the beach near the big hotels. A place we regularly visit is "Carlos & Charlies".

To your question whether I drive a car, my answer to you is affirmative. I drive a green Honda Civic, made in 1997 or 1998. I cannot remember the plate-number right now but it is registered to my big brother named "Miguel Angel CARRASQUILIA CACERES".

To your question as to what kind of person Joran is, I can state the following. He is a good friend. I have never had a problem with him. I do not know him to be an aggressive person. I have seen Joran drunk before. When Joran is drunk, he is a truly happy person at least on the occasions where I witnessed him being drunk.

On May 29th 2005, between the hours of 16.00 and 19.00, I was called by Joran on my mobile phone with the phone number "xxxxxxx". Sometimes Joran calls me on the mobile phone of my sister, her name is "Maria del Pilar CARRASQUIXIA CACERES". Her calling name is "Pilar". The mobile phone number of Pilar is "xxxxxxx". The mobile phone number of Joran is "xxxxxxx". Joran had asked me whether I wanted to go out with him that night. He told me that a few American girls would go to "Carlos & Charlies" and whether I wanted to meet up with him there. According to me I had said to Joran that I would let him know later that day whether or not I would go out with him that night. I had also said to Joran that I had to work the next day. According to me I was phoned later that day by Joran again but I hadn't answered my mobile phone. Because it is the vacation now I temporarily work in "Caribbean Overseas". I work in the big Poolkasten. On May 29th 2005 I stayed home and slept. I went to bed at approximately 22.00 hours.

On May 30th 2005, in the nightly hours, I had not talked to Joran. It is possible that Joran phoned me, but I didn't answer my mobile phone because I was sleeping. I am sure that Joran did not send me any messages with his mobile phone in the night of May 30th 2005.

On May 30th 2005, approximately 06.00 hours, I woke up. I went for a run. I ran to Wendy's Palm Beach and at approximately 07.00 hours, I returned home. I do not know how many kilometers that is. After I got home I went and showered and at approximately 07.45 hours, i went to work. Between the hours of 08.00 and 17.00, I was not phoned by Joran. After I finished work I went straight home and at approximately 17.30 I arrived home. After that I didn't go out that day. According to me I wasn't phoned that day by Joran. Joran had on that day also sent messages. It is possible he gave me an "missed-call" message on my phone but I am not sure about that. I at least did not call Joran because I had no money/minutes left on my pre-paid phone so I couldn't call him. At approximately 23.00, I had to pick up my father where he works. My dad works at the Wyndham Hotel. After I picked up my father from work we drove home. At approximately 23.20, we arrived home and I immediately went to sleep/bed.

On May 31th 2005, approximately 05.45 hours, I woke up and approximately 06.00 hours, I went and ran the same route.

On June 1st 2005, approximately 05.45 hours, I woke up. I did not go for a run that day. I stayed and watch sport news on TV. Approximately 07.45 hours, I left for work again and at approximately 17.30 hours that day, I returned home. According to me I stayed home again that day.

I do not remember with certainty what day it was or what time it was, when Joran called me on my mobile phone. Joran asked me whether I could remember that one day he had asked me to go out together with a few American girls. Joran told me that the girl that had gone out with him had gone missing now and that Deepak, Satish and he dropped off the girl at the "Holiday Inn Hotel". Joran said that he would talk to me about it later. I answered Joran that that was fine. (With Joran, Deepak and Satish is meant the suspects "Joran Andreas Petrus van der SLOOT", "Deepak Sharma KALPOE" and "Satish Shanaa KALPOE; comment Croes).

After that if I am not mistaken it was the beginning of June 2005, it was a Friday- or Saturday night that I bought a pizza at Domino's and then went to Joran's place. (with this the 3rd or 4th of June is meant; comment Croes). On that day I arrived at approximately 21.00 hours at Joran's place. I saw that "Koen", "Sander" and Joran were in the apartment of Joran and that they were playing poker. Koen and Sander are brothers but I do not know their last name. I had told Joran that I would be bringing them a pizza and a coca-cola. I also asked Joran if they had found the missing girl. Joran answered me that the missing girl had not been found yet. Then Joran told me that Deepak, Satish and he drove in the four door grey car, make Honda Civic that was owned by Deepak to "Carlos & Charlies" and that the three of them had then driven around with the missing girl. According to Joran the girl was strange. Joran told me that the girl was strange because she told him that her mother was "Hitler's sister". Joran told me that the girl wanted to see the sharks in the sea of Aruba and that they had dropped off the missing girl at the Holiday Inn Hotel.

When Joran was telling me this is father entered the apartment and after that the subject was not spoken about anymore. At approximately 23.00 hours, I left Joran's to pick up my dad from where he worked.

After that I was again called by Joran on my mobile phone. I cannot remember the date or the time when he called me. Joran had told me to come and spend the night together with "Freddy" at his place. According to me it was on a Friday or a Saturday. I had told Joran that I would come over to his place to spend the night. But I did not go to his place. On that day I went out to dinner with my girlfriend named "Karina ROMERO". The next day in the early hours of the morning, I had sent Joran a message that I hadn't been able to spend the night at his place because I had been busy. After that I got a message from Joran saying that it was OK/cool.

To your question whether Joran wanted me to keep something for him, I can state the following. Joran had not given me anything that I should keep for him.

To your question whether if had helped Joran with regard to the case surrounding the missing girl "Natalee Ann Holloway", I answer you the following. What I just told you is what Joran told me. I know nothing else about the missing girl.

To your question as to who "Andre" is, I answer you that he is a friend of Joran's. He lives in Palm beach. I do not know what car he drives. According to me he goes to the "Mon Plaisier College". I don't have Andre's mobile telephone number and I do not know his last name either. I can point out to you the house where Andre lives. I further have to remark that Joran goes to casino with Andre. Andre has a younger/smaller brother called "Arthur".

To your question as to who "Guido" is, I answer you that he too is a friend of Joran's. He regularly plays tennis with Joran at the "Raquet Club". Joran told me that Guido is a croupier at the casino but he did not mention to me which casino. I do not know the mobile telephone number of Guido. I have to remark that Guido speaks funny and that according to me he is "gay".

To you question as to who "pimp" is, I answer you that it is us, meaning the friends of Joran call each other that. It is a habit to call each other pimp.

To your question whether I know a Spanish speaking girl named "Stephanie", I answer you affermative. She is a Columbian girl and according to me she is the girlfriend of Joran. According to me Stephanie lives in the hamlet of Moko but I do not know the number of her house.

To your question whether I know the man named "Max Arends", I answer you the following. He is a friend of Joran and he is also at the "International School". According to me his name is "Maximillian Arends".

This is my truthful given statement. If you have further questions, I am willing to answer them.

J. A. CARRASQUILIA CACERES,

After witness J.A. CARRASQUILLA CACERES, had read his statement he stated that he would persist in it and then he signed it.

Of this we, CROES and JACOBS, on our out as officers have made this proces-verbaal, closed and signed on June 17th 2005.



DUTCH:
http://i14.photobucket.com/albums/a306/klaasend/SM%20Property/Jaime0617D1.jpg
http://i14.photobucket.com/albums/a306/klaasend/SM%20Property/Jaime0617D2.jpg
http://i14.photobucket.com/albums/a306/klaasend/SM%20Property/Jaime0617D3.jpg
http://i14.photobucket.com/albums/a306/klaasend/SM%20Property/Jaime0617D4.jpg
http://i14.photobucket.com/albums/a306/klaasend/SM%20Property/Jaime0617D5.jpg
http://i14.photobucket.com/albums/a306/klaasend/SM%20Property/Jaime0617D6.jpg
http://i14.photobucket.com/albums/a306/klaasend/SM%20Property/Jaime0617D7.jpg


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #789 1/1/09 -
Post by: Blue Moon on January 02, 2009, 09:37:00 PM
Gee, what are the odds that Greta is in Aruba?

Let's ask the Magic 8 Ball ... Outlook good

Looks like there may be some action taking place in the NH case ... the moons are starting to align.

Don't tease us Red, SPIT IT OUT.

We know that JQK said he was going to attempt to meet up with Brinkman in Aruba.  I wouldn't be surprised if Greta didn't go as well.  The big question is, is there something about to happen??  I want to know too!

Maybe with John Q.'s help Greta is going to present her info that can break this case and then John Q. could lay the trap pics on them at the same time.  (Just hoping)


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #789 1/1/09 -
Post by: Keepthefaith on January 02, 2009, 09:38:04 PM
Minister Swaen envolvi den accidente 
Policial 
Tuesday, 30 December 2008 - 00:00 
Dialuna atardi na altura di Codemsa a sosode un accidente entre e Toyota Corrola A-26978 y e Toyota Starlet A-26520. No ta conosi e motibo exacto di e accidente pero den e Corrola tabata maneha pa Minister di Finansas Sr. Nilo Swean y na momento cu e la bai baha pa atende cu e otro chauffeur tocante di e accidente, e chauffer di e Toyota Starlet a baha y ranca careda bai lagando su auto atras. E Minister a dicidi di jama Polis y a keda sinta den su auto warda wak si tog ainda e chauffer di e otro auto lo por regresa pa buska su auto. Click read more pa mas imagen.

Is this the same Nilo Swean related to CMB???


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #789 1/1/09 -
Post by: Keepthefaith on January 02, 2009, 09:40:10 PM
Minister Swaen envolvi den accidente 
Policial 
Tuesday, 30 December 2008 - 00:00 
Dialuna atardi na altura di Codemsa a sosode un accidente entre e Toyota Corrola A-26978 y e Toyota Starlet A-26520. No ta conosi e motibo exacto di e accidente pero den e Corrola tabata maneha pa Minister di Finansas Sr. Nilo Swean y na momento cu e la bai baha pa atende cu e otro chauffeur tocante di e accidente, e chauffer di e Toyota Starlet a baha y ranca careda bai lagando su auto atras. E Minister a dicidi di jama Polis y a keda sinta den su auto warda wak si tog ainda e chauffer di e otro auto lo por regresa pa buska su auto. Click read more pa mas imagen.

Is this the same Nilo Swean related to CMB???


http://www.24ora.com/content/view/6906/8/


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #789 1/1/09 -
Post by: wreck on January 02, 2009, 09:40:27 PM
LDSTLOU - if Joran van der Sloot emailed me and confessed to Natalee dying and his disposing of her body, would it bother you if I posted the jest of that email in the forum?  Just so people could have a good idea what was sent to me?  Or would you think it more important to honor a private email and not tell anyone about it?

I don't see that Caps was posting any confession. Kermit says she is not allowed to post it and yet she posts it. And no, if I had an e-mail from Joran confessing I would not post it at SM, I would turn it over to the FBI who I am sure would tell me to keep my mouth shut about it and I would keep my mouth shut about it.

Which Kyle DID NOT do.  He posted on a private forum his concerns instead of giving the information to the FBI.

that is not true. All footage was turned over to the FBI. Do you wonder why JQK, Tim Miller, Dateline the FBI and the Family are not speaking out about the Persistence? Could it be because it was all done on the up and up? Kyle also asked that his posts not be made public. I believe Jen's letter said they sought legal advice and were told not to publish his posts...am I wrong?

Yes, I believe you are WRONG:

1.  From Kermit's and Kyle's posts the information was turned over to the FBI and JQK because neither Kyle or John Silvetti did.

2.  I believe Jen stated they were told to stay away from Kyle, nothing about NOT publishing his posts.  I think it was Kyle that threatened people if they published them.

The footage WAS turned over to the FBI immediately. You do our FBI a disservice imho by thinking they walked away without it.

Jen also stated I believe, that they had compiled their findings, when Kyle came back he asked that they not post the piece they had put together because they had taken speculation and turned it into facts and had taken his words out of context. So why haven't the Freebirds published the material that Kermit brought here to SM? Why the need to leave the Freebirds to post the material? Am I wrong and the Freebirds are publishing their findings on the Persistence?



How do you know EVERYTHING was turned over to the FBI IMMEDIATELY? Because Kyle told YOU so? He told Freebirds exactly the opposite.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #789 1/1/09 -
Post by: klaasend on January 02, 2009, 09:41:36 PM

The footage WAS turned over to the FBI immediately. You do our FBI a disservice imho by thinking they walked away without it.  (not according to Kyles own words)

Jen also stated I believe, that they had compiled their findings, when Kyle came back he asked that they not post the piece they had put together because they had taken speculation and turned it into facts and had taken his words out of context. So why haven't the Freebirds published the material that Kermit brought here to SM? Why the need to leave the Freebirds to post the material? Am I wrong and the Freebirds are publishing their findings on the Persistence?
(could Kermit or another Freebird please address LDSTLOU's assertion)



My answers above in Red.  Sorry but I cannot answer for the Freebirds.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #789 1/1/09 -
Post by: klaasend on January 02, 2009, 09:42:51 PM
Minister Swaen envolvi den accidente 
Policial 
Tuesday, 30 December 2008 - 00:00 
Dialuna atardi na altura di Codemsa a sosode un accidente entre e Toyota Corrola A-26978 y e Toyota Starlet A-26520. No ta conosi e motibo exacto di e accidente pero den e Corrola tabata maneha pa Minister di Finansas Sr. Nilo Swean y na momento cu e la bai baha pa atende cu e otro chauffeur tocante di e accidente, e chauffer di e Toyota Starlet a baha y ranca careda bai lagando su auto atras. E Minister a dicidi di jama Polis y a keda sinta den su auto warda wak si tog ainda e chauffer di e otro auto lo por regresa pa buska su auto. Click read more pa mas imagen.

Is this the same Nilo Swean related to CMB???


http://www.24ora.com/content/view/6906/8/

Probably


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #789 1/1/09 -
Post by: truthseeker2 on January 02, 2009, 09:45:08 PM
Klaas,

Do you know where this is:

Jaime Alberto CARRASQUILIA CACERES, born in Columbia on April 25 1985, E.P.I.(Sector Economico)

A least is appears they are speaking of a location in Colombia.  From what I understand, in Colombia, sections are called Departments.  Such as Atlantico Department is where Barranquilla is.  But I did not find anything called Sectors.  Maybe they do have internal locations called sectors, but I did not find anything called Economico.  Researching Ecomonico Sector brings up things having to do with the Economic Sector, as in the country's economy.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #789 1/1/09 -
Post by: Sleuth on January 02, 2009, 09:45:44 PM
http://www.magic8ball.midnightfun.co.uk/8ball.php

Will there be justice in Aruba?

(http://i118.photobucket.com/albums/o100/klaasen3/Sub5/8ball.jpg)

LOL....
(http://i719.photobucket.com/albums/ww194/photo_777/EightBall.jpg)


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #789 1/1/09 -
Post by: bastibro on January 02, 2009, 09:45:52 PM
GOODNIGHT EVERYONE ::MonkeyWink::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #789 1/1/09 -
Post by: San on January 02, 2009, 09:47:05 PM
LDSTLOU - if Joran van der Sloot emailed me and confessed to Natalee dying and his disposing of her body, would it bother you if I posted the jest of that email in the forum?  Just so people could have a good idea what was sent to me?  Or would you think it more important to honor a private email and not tell anyone about it?

I don't see that Caps was posting any confession. Kermit says she is not allowed to post it and yet she posts it. And no, if I had an e-mail from Joran confessing I would not post it at SM, I would turn it over to the FBI who I am sure would tell me to keep my mouth shut about it and I would keep my mouth shut about it.

Which Kyle DID NOT do.  He posted on a private forum his concerns instead of giving the information to the FBI.

that is not true. All footage was turned over to the FBI. Do you wonder why JQK, Tim Miller, Dateline the FBI and the Family are not speaking out about the Persistence? Could it be because it was all done on the up and up? Kyle also asked that his posts not be made public. I believe Jen's letter said they sought legal advice and were told not to publish his posts...am I wrong?

Yes, I believe you are WRONG:

1.  From Kermit's and Kyle's posts the information was turned over to the FBI and JQK because neither Kyle or John Silvetti did.

2.  I believe Jen stated they were told to stay away from Kyle, nothing about NOT publishing his posts.  I think it was Kyle that threatened people if they published them.

The footage WAS turned over to the FBI immediately. You do our FBI a disservice imho by thinking they walked away without it.

Jen also stated I believe, that they had compiled their findings, when Kyle came back he asked that they not post the piece they had put together because they had taken speculation and turned it into facts and had taken his words out of context. So why haven't the Freebirds published the material that Kermit brought here to SM? Why the need to leave the Freebirds to post the material? Am I wrong and the Freebirds are publishing their findings on the Persistence?


Define immediately.  When was the footage/pictures turned over.  Do you know this answer.  Can you provide a factual date.

I don't want to hear Kyle said immediately.  I want a date.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #789 1/1/09 -
Post by: Keepthefaith on January 02, 2009, 09:47:34 PM
GOODNIGHT EVERYONE ::MonkeyWink::

Goodnight Bastibro..


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #789 1/1/09 -
Post by: wreck on January 02, 2009, 09:48:00 PM
http://www.magic8ball.midnightfun.co.uk/8ball.php

Will there be justice in Aruba?

(http://i118.photobucket.com/albums/o100/klaasen3/Sub5/8ball.jpg)

LOL....
(http://i719.photobucket.com/albums/ww194/photo_777/EightBall.jpg)
Congratulations on your "work release"!!  ::MonkeyWink::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #789 1/1/09 -
Post by: MuffyBee on January 02, 2009, 09:48:02 PM
Good night bastibro  :smt015


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #789 1/1/09 -
Post by: truthseeker2 on January 02, 2009, 09:49:11 PM
GOODNIGHT EVERYONE ::MonkeyWink::

Goodnight, bastibro.  Thanks for the artwork!


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #789 1/1/09 -
Post by: Keepthefaith on January 02, 2009, 09:51:49 PM

Yeah, and I keep waiting to hear those tapes.

You are aware that Jaime made a trip over to the Wyndham around 11:00 pm on 5/30/05...just as Andre says Joran and Guido walked 'outside'?????????

And Jaime lineage is from where?

Jaime says he went to pick up his dad?Did his dad work that night?

Why, Colombia, of course.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #789 1/1/09 -
Post by: Lifesong on January 02, 2009, 09:51:55 PM
http://www.magic8ball.midnightfun.co.uk/8ball.php

Will there be justice in Aruba?

(http://i118.photobucket.com/albums/o100/klaasen3/Sub5/8ball.jpg)

LOL....
(http://i719.photobucket.com/albums/ww194/photo_777/EightBall.jpg)

heh heh heh

* If Betim is still in love with Lena, he shouldn't be marrying Laura! *

 ::MonkeyEek::   ::MonkeyRoll::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #789 1/1/09 -
Post by: Keepthefaith on January 02, 2009, 09:52:19 PM

Yeah, and I keep waiting to hear those tapes.

You are aware that Jaime made a trip over to the Wyndham around 11:00 pm on 5/30/05...just as Andre says Joran and Guido walked 'outside'?????????

And Jaime lineage is from where?

Jaime says he went to pick up his dad?Did his dad work that night?

Why, Colombia, of course.

Jaime says he went to pick up his dad?Did his dad work that night?


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #789 1/1/09 -
Post by: ldstlou on January 02, 2009, 09:52:54 PM
LDSTLOU - if Joran van der Sloot emailed me and confessed to Natalee dying and his disposing of her body, would it bother you if I posted the jest of that email in the forum?  Just so people could have a good idea what was sent to me?  Or would you think it more important to honor a private email and not tell anyone about it?

I don't see that Caps was posting any confession. Kermit says she is not allowed to post it and yet she posts it. And no, if I had an e-mail from Joran confessing I would not post it at SM, I would turn it over to the FBI who I am sure would tell me to keep my mouth shut about it and I would keep my mouth shut about it.

Which Kyle DID NOT do.  He posted on a private forum his concerns instead of giving the information to the FBI.

that is not true. All footage was turned over to the FBI. Do you wonder why JQK, Tim Miller, Dateline the FBI and the Family are not speaking out about the Persistence? Could it be because it was all done on the up and up? Kyle also asked that his posts not be made public. I believe Jen's letter said they sought legal advice and were told not to publish his posts...am I wrong?

Yes, I believe you are WRONG:

1.  From Kermit's and Kyle's posts the information was turned over to the FBI and JQK because neither Kyle or John Silvetti did.

2.  I believe Jen stated they were told to stay away from Kyle, nothing about NOT publishing his posts.  I think it was Kyle that threatened people if they published them.

The footage WAS turned over to the FBI immediately. You do our FBI a disservice imho by thinking they walked away without it.

Jen also stated I believe, that they had compiled their findings, when Kyle came back he asked that they not post the piece they had put together because they had taken speculation and turned it into facts and had taken his words out of context. So why haven't the Freebirds published the material that Kermit brought here to SM? Why the need to leave the Freebirds to post the material? Am I wrong and the Freebirds are publishing their findings on the Persistence?


Define immediately.  When was the footage/pictures turned over.  Do you know this answer.  Can you provide a factual date.

I don't want to hear Kyle said immediately.  I want a date.


the day they were created!!!!


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #789 1/1/09 -
Post by: klaasend on January 02, 2009, 09:53:55 PM
Klaas,

Do you know where this is:

Jaime Alberto CARRASQUILIA CACERES, born in Columbia on April 25 1985, E.P.I.(Sector Economico)

A least is appears they are speaking of a location in Colombia.  From what I understand, in Colombia, sections are called Departments.  Such as Atlantico Department is where Barranquilla is.  But I did not find anything called Sectors.  Maybe they do have internal locations called sectors, but I did not find anything called Economico.  Researching Ecomonico Sector brings up things having to do with the Economic Sector, as in the country's economy.

All I know is that it is in Columbia.  I have not researched anything about that location in Columbia.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #789 1/1/09 -
Post by: Lifesong on January 02, 2009, 09:54:48 PM

Define immediately.  When was the footage/pictures turned over.  Do you know this answer.  Can you provide a factual date.

I don't want to hear Kyle said immediately.  I want a date.


the day they were created!!!!


The pics from January 7th ldstlou - not December 30.




Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #789 1/1/09 -
Post by: Keepthefaith on January 02, 2009, 09:55:03 PM
LDSTLOU - if Joran van der Sloot emailed me and confessed to Natalee dying and his disposing of her body, would it bother you if I posted the jest of that email in the forum?  Just so people could have a good idea what was sent to me?  Or would you think it more important to honor a private email and not tell anyone about it?

I don't see that Caps was posting any confession. Kermit says she is not allowed to post it and yet she posts it. And no, if I had an e-mail from Joran confessing I would not post it at SM, I would turn it over to the FBI who I am sure would tell me to keep my mouth shut about it and I would keep my mouth shut about it.

Which Kyle DID NOT do.  He posted on a private forum his concerns instead of giving the information to the FBI.

that is not true. All footage was turned over to the FBI. Do you wonder why JQK, Tim Miller, Dateline the FBI and the Family are not speaking out about the Persistence? Could it be because it was all done on the up and up? Kyle also asked that his posts not be made public. I believe Jen's letter said they sought legal advice and were told not to publish his posts...am I wrong?

Yes, I believe you are WRONG:

1.  From Kermit's and Kyle's posts the information was turned over to the FBI and JQK because neither Kyle or John Silvetti did.

2.  I believe Jen stated they were told to stay away from Kyle, nothing about NOT publishing his posts.  I think it was Kyle that threatened people if they published them.

The footage WAS turned over to the FBI immediately. You do our FBI a disservice imho by thinking they walked away without it.

Jen also stated I believe, that they had compiled their findings, when Kyle came back he asked that they not post the piece they had put together because they had taken speculation and turned it into facts and had taken his words out of context. So why haven't the Freebirds published the material that Kermit brought here to SM? Why the need to leave the Freebirds to post the material? Am I wrong and the Freebirds are publishing their findings on the Persistence?


Define immediately.  When was the footage/pictures turned over.  Do you know this answer.  Can you provide a factual date.

I don't want to hear Kyle said immediately.  I want a date.


the day they were created!!!!

What day were they created?


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #789 1/1/09 -
Post by: klaasend on January 02, 2009, 09:55:40 PM
LDSTLOU - so you are saying all of those photos of the trap and information about it was turned over to the FBI on January 7th 2008?


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #789 1/1/09 -
Post by: Sleuth on January 02, 2009, 09:56:10 PM

Quote
Congratulations on your "work release"!!  ::MonkeyWink::

LOL Wreck.   That work release one was just before Klaas's - there is a high probability it was her, wishing for a "release" from the "he said, she said" postings.   


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #789 1/1/09 -
Post by: San on January 02, 2009, 09:57:46 PM

Quote
Congratulations on your "work release"!!  ::MonkeyWink::

LOL Wreck.   That work release one was just before Klaas's - there is a high probability it was her, wishing for a "release" from the "he said, she said" postings.   

Hi Sleuth, Happy New Year to you.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #789 1/1/09 -
Post by: AZSunny on January 02, 2009, 09:57:56 PM

Quote
Congratulations on your "work release"!!  ::MonkeyWink::

LOL Wreck.   That work release one was just before Klaas's - there is a high probability it was her, wishing for a "release" from the "he said, she said" postings.   

Hey Sleuth...good to see you back at it!


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #789 1/1/09 -
Post by: ldstlou on January 02, 2009, 09:58:54 PM

Define immediately.  When was the footage/pictures turned over.  Do you know this answer.  Can you provide a factual date.

I don't want to hear Kyle said immediately.  I want a date.


the day they were created!!!!


The pics from January 7th ldstlou - not December 30.




Hotshot answered this one a few times i think. These were not Kyle's responsibility to turn over. They were turned over by either John or Tim. Kyle can't say for sure because he was not  there when they were turned over. Any date he gave would be pure speculation.  This does NOT imply a conspiracy, nor that they were not turned over timely, it only says that it wasn't Kyle's responsibility at the time and he was not the one who turned over the footage...but it was turned over.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #789 1/1/09 -
Post by: Sleuth on January 02, 2009, 10:00:05 PM
Hi San and AZSunny - Happy New Years to you, and to all the monkeys.



Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #789 1/1/09 -
Post by: klaasend on January 02, 2009, 10:00:56 PM
http://www.magic8ball.midnightfun.co.uk/8ball.php

Will there be justice in Aruba?

(http://i118.photobucket.com/albums/o100/klaasen3/Sub5/8ball.jpg)

LOL....
(http://i719.photobucket.com/albums/ww194/photo_777/EightBall.jpg)

ROFLMAO  ::MonkeyHaHa::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #789 1/1/09 -
Post by: truthseeker2 on January 02, 2009, 10:01:33 PM

Yeah, and I keep waiting to hear those tapes.

You are aware that Jaime made a trip over to the Wyndham around 11:00 pm on 5/30/05...just as Andre says Joran and Guido walked 'outside'?????????

And Jaime lineage is from where?

Jaime says he went to pick up his dad?Did his dad work that night?

Why, Colombia, of course.

Jaime says he went to pick up his dad?Did his dad work that night?

Well, according to jaime he did.  To me, the coincidence is less likely that Jaime would be ariving at the Wyndham at the same time Joran and Guido were leaving the casino area.  Joran claims they went over to the Aruba Grand to cash in chips from earlier that night.  They do not go back into the Wyndham.  The migrate over to the Radisson.  Andre joins them there later and then Deepak shows up.

Joran admits to calling Jaime on the 29th, just before he called Deepak.  Jaime says Joran called him between 4 and 7.  Jaime says he may have missed a call from Joran later because he was sleeping.  Maybe....maybe not.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #789 1/1/09 -
Post by: ldstlou on January 02, 2009, 10:01:50 PM

Define immediately.  When was the footage/pictures turned over.  Do you know this answer.  Can you provide a factual date.

I don't want to hear Kyle said immediately.  I want a date.


the day they were created!!!!


The pics from January 7th ldstlou - not December 30.




Hotshot answered this one a few times i think. These were not Kyle's responsibility to turn over. They were turned over by either John or Tim. Kyle can't say for sure because he was not  there when they were turned over. Any date he gave would be pure speculation.  This does NOT imply a conspiracy, nor that they were not turned over timely, it only says that it wasn't Kyle's responsibility at the time and he was not the one who turned over the footage...but it was turned over.

there are two separate issues here, screen shots and the actual footage. Sceen shots were sent daily as intructed by the FBI agents in charge, and the footage was turned over at the first opportunity.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #789 1/1/09 -
Post by: Tamikosmom on January 02, 2009, 10:02:40 PM
LDSTLOU - if Joran van der Sloot emailed me and confessed to Natalee dying and his disposing of her body, would it bother you if I posted the jest of that email in the forum?  Just so people could have a good idea what was sent to me?  Or would you think it more important to honor a private email and not tell anyone about it?

I don't see that Caps was posting any confession. Kermit says she is not allowed to post it and yet she posts it. And no, if I had an e-mail from Joran confessing I would not post it at SM, I would turn it over to the FBI who I am sure would tell me to keep my mouth shut about it and I would keep my mouth shut about it.

Which Kyle DID NOT do.  He posted on a private forum his concerns instead of giving the information to the FBI.

that is not true. All footage was turned over to the FBI. Do you wonder why JQK, Tim Miller, Dateline the FBI and the Family are not speaking out about the Persistence? Could it be because it was all done on the up and up? Kyle also asked that his posts not be made public. I believe Jen's letter said they sought legal advice and were told not to publish his posts...am I wrong?

Yes, I believe you are WRONG:

1.  From Kermit's and Kyle's posts the information was turned over to the FBI and JQK because neither Kyle or John Silvetti did.

2.  I believe Jen stated they were told to stay away from Kyle, nothing about NOT publishing his posts.  I think it was Kyle that threatened people if they published them.

The footage WAS turned over to the FBI immediately. You do our FBI a disservice imho by thinking they walked away without it.

Jen also stated I believe, that they had compiled their findings, when Kyle came back he asked that they not post the piece they had put together because they had taken speculation and turned it into facts and had taken his words out of context. So why haven't the Freebirds published the material that Kermit brought here to SM? Why the need to leave the Freebirds to post the material? Am I wrong and the Freebirds are publishing their findings on the Persistence?


Lou ... you are wrong.  The ROV images already have a copyright.

The Natalee's Freebirds' motivations are not self-serving.  At all times Justice for Natalee Holloway and ... closure for her long-suffering family has been where it was at.  The time and effort put into research to produce documents ... to expose the corrupt Aruban investigation that has prevented justice from prevailing from the getgo ... has been a labor of love.

I should know.  I was a Natalee's Freebird prior to making the decision to fly the coop and ...  focus on the SM Natalee forum ... an open forum.

Janet
________

Kermit
Re: Natalee Case Discussion #786 12/17/08 -
« Reply #544 on: December 19, 2008, 06:52:12 PM »


PERHAPS KYLE VIOLATED THE COPYRIGHT HIMSELF

Kyle said
: "She [BETH] needs to know exactly what we found in the proper timing. The way to do that would be through Tim Trahan and I. I can arrange any meeting with him. He represents the owner and the rights to the data, in this case, Louis S. I have everything but I don't want to go around him for chain of custody reasons, professional courtesy, and friendship."
 
The next step:
I will soon propose a meeting with Beth and other family members, myself, Tim Trahan, Peter DeVries, and whomever else necessary to go over the ROV video, contents, and case status. I would like a couple people very familiar with the case documents also present to help connect dots during the meeting. I would prefer meeting towards the end of April or mid-May to allow adequate time for things to shake themselves out if is going to. If necessary, I have an ABC (20/20) and CBS (early show) film crew ready and willing to take part in such a meeting should it require press coverage. I've already had a meeting with ABC about this and they are "definitely interested" at the executive level. We met in mid-Feb about this already. The question becomes timing, who needs to be there, and whether or not it's covered by the press. I prefer not, but it may be useful. DeVries doesn't need to be there in my opinion but he's good for ratings and helps ABC be cooperative if needed.

He certainly is a planner
[edited to protect the individual] needs to be called and ask to request the removal of the post by either her
or PI to Klaas. 

http://scaredmonkeys.net/index.php?topic=4246.msg592533;topicseen#msg592533


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #789 1/1/09 -
Post by: Keepthefaith on January 02, 2009, 10:03:31 PM

Yeah, and I keep waiting to hear those tapes.

You are aware that Jaime made a trip over to the Wyndham around 11:00 pm on 5/30/05...just as Andre says Joran and Guido walked 'outside'?????????

And Jaime lineage is from where?

Jaime says he went to pick up his dad?Did his dad work that night?

Why, Colombia, of course.

Jaime says he went to pick up his dad?Did his dad work that night?

Well, according to jaime he did.  To me, the coincidence is less likely that Jaime would be ariving at the Wyndham at the same time Joran and Guido were leaving the casino area.  Joran claims they went over to the Aruba Grand to cash in chips from earlier that night.  They do not go back into the Wyndham.  The migrate over to the Radisson.  Andre joins them there later and then Deepak shows up.

Joran admits to calling Jaime on the 29th, just before he called Deepak.  Jaime says Joran called him between 4 and 7.  Jaime says he may have missed a call from Joran later because he was sleeping.  Maybe....maybe not.

Is Guido related to Wever Marine Aruba??


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #789 1/1/09 -
Post by: ldstlou on January 02, 2009, 10:07:43 PM
LDSTLOU - if Joran van der Sloot emailed me and confessed to Natalee dying and his disposing of her body, would it bother you if I posted the jest of that email in the forum?  Just so people could have a good idea what was sent to me?  Or would you think it more important to honor a private email and not tell anyone about it?

I don't see that Caps was posting any confession. Kermit says she is not allowed to post it and yet she posts it. And no, if I had an e-mail from Joran confessing I would not post it at SM, I would turn it over to the FBI who I am sure would tell me to keep my mouth shut about it and I would keep my mouth shut about it.

Which Kyle DID NOT do.  He posted on a private forum his concerns instead of giving the information to the FBI.

that is not true. All footage was turned over to the FBI. Do you wonder why JQK, Tim Miller, Dateline the FBI and the Family are not speaking out about the Persistence? Could it be because it was all done on the up and up? Kyle also asked that his posts not be made public. I believe Jen's letter said they sought legal advice and were told not to publish his posts...am I wrong?

Yes, I believe you are WRONG:

1.  From Kermit's and Kyle's posts the information was turned over to the FBI and JQK because neither Kyle or John Silvetti did.

2.  I believe Jen stated they were told to stay away from Kyle, nothing about NOT publishing his posts.  I think it was Kyle that threatened people if they published them.

The footage WAS turned over to the FBI immediately. You do our FBI a disservice imho by thinking they walked away without it.

Jen also stated I believe, that they had compiled their findings, when Kyle came back he asked that they not post the piece they had put together because they had taken speculation and turned it into facts and had taken his words out of context. So why haven't the Freebirds published the material that Kermit brought here to SM? Why the need to leave the Freebirds to post the material? Am I wrong and the Freebirds are publishing their findings on the Persistence?


Lou ... you are wrong.  The ROV images already have a copyright.

The Natalee's Freebirds' motivations are not self-serving.  At all times Justice for Natalee Holloway and ... closure for her long-suffering family has been where it was at.  The time and effort put into research to produce documents ... to expose the corrupt Aruban investigation that has prevented justice from prevailing from the getgo ... has been a labor of love.

I should know.  I was a Natalee's Freebird prior to making the decision to fly the coop and ...  focus on the SM Natalee forum ... an open forum.

Janet
________

Kermit
Re: Natalee Case Discussion #786 12/17/08 -
« Reply #544 on: December 19, 2008, 06:52:12 PM »


PERHAPS KYLE VIOLATED THE COPYRIGHT HIMSELF

Kyle said
: "She [BETH] needs to know exactly what we found in the proper timing. The way to do that would be through Tim Trahan and I. I can arrange any meeting with him. He represents the owner and the rights to the data, in this case, Louis S. I have everything but I don't want to go around him for chain of custody reasons, professional courtesy, and friendship."
 
The next step:
I will soon propose a meeting with Beth and other family members, myself, Tim Trahan, Peter DeVries, and whomever else necessary to go over the ROV video, contents, and case status. I would like a couple people very familiar with the case documents also present to help connect dots during the meeting. I would prefer meeting towards the end of April or mid-May to allow adequate time for things to shake themselves out if is going to. If necessary, I have an ABC (20/20) and CBS (early show) film crew ready and willing to take part in such a meeting should it require press coverage. I've already had a meeting with ABC about this and they are "definitely interested" at the executive level. We met in mid-Feb about this already. The question becomes timing, who needs to be there, and whether or not it's covered by the press. I prefer not, but it may be useful. DeVries doesn't need to be there in my opinion but he's good for ratings and helps ABC be cooperative if needed.

He certainly is a planner
[edited to protect the individual] needs to be called and ask to request the removal of the post by either her
or PI to Klaas. 

http://scaredmonkeys.net/index.php?topic=4246.msg592533;topicseen#msg592533


See Janet, I don't see a cover-up. I see Kyle disclosing everything. Where is the cover-up?


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #789 1/1/09 -
Post by: klaasend on January 02, 2009, 10:09:11 PM

Define immediately.  When was the footage/pictures turned over.  Do you know this answer.  Can you provide a factual date.

I don't want to hear Kyle said immediately.  I want a date.


the day they were created!!!!


The pics from January 7th ldstlou - not December 30.




Hotshot answered this one a few times i think. These were not Kyle's responsibility to turn over. They were turned over by either John or Tim. Kyle can't say for sure because he was not  there when they were turned over. Any date he gave would be pure speculation.  This does NOT imply a conspiracy, nor that they were not turned over timely, it only says that it wasn't Kyle's responsibility at the time and he was not the one who turned over the footage...but it was turned over.

Then how can you say immediately?


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #789 1/1/09 -
Post by: ldstlou on January 02, 2009, 10:12:24 PM

Define immediately.  When was the footage/pictures turned over.  Do you know this answer.  Can you provide a factual date.

I don't want to hear Kyle said immediately.  I want a date.


the day they were created!!!!


The pics from January 7th ldstlou - not December 30.




Hotshot answered this one a few times i think. These were not Kyle's responsibility to turn over. They were turned over by either John or Tim. Kyle can't say for sure because he was not  there when they were turned over. Any date he gave would be pure speculation.  This does NOT imply a conspiracy, nor that they were not turned over timely, it only says that it wasn't Kyle's responsibility at the time and he was not the one who turned over the footage...but it was turned over.

Then how can you say immediately?

Two issues, screen shots sent the day they were taken, footage at the first opportunity. Immediately as in not months later...sorry I did not clarify my meaning of immediately.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #789 1/1/09 -
Post by: Keepthefaith on January 02, 2009, 10:13:34 PM

Define immediately.  When was the footage/pictures turned over.  Do you know this answer.  Can you provide a factual date.

I don't want to hear Kyle said immediately.  I want a date.


the day they were created!!!!


The pics from January 7th ldstlou - not December 30.




Hotshot answered this one a few times i think. These were not Kyle's responsibility to turn over. They were turned over by either John or Tim. Kyle can't say for sure because he was not  there when they were turned over. Any date he gave would be pure speculation.  This does NOT imply a conspiracy, nor that they were not turned over timely, it only says that it wasn't Kyle's responsibility at the time and he was not the one who turned over the footage...but it was turned over.

Then how can you say immediately?

Two issues, screen shots sent the day they were taken, footage at the first opportunity. Immediately as in not months later...sorry I did not clarify my meaning of immediately.

??????


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #789 1/1/09 -
Post by: truthseeker2 on January 02, 2009, 10:14:24 PM


Jaime says he went to pick up his dad?Did his dad work that night?

Well, according to jaime he did.  To me, the coincidence is less likely that Jaime would be ariving at the Wyndham at the same time Joran and Guido were leaving the casino area.  Joran claims they went over to the Aruba Grand to cash in chips from earlier that night.  They do not go back into the Wyndham.  The migrate over to the Radisson.  Andre joins them there later and then Deepak shows up.

Joran admits to calling Jaime on the 29th, just before he called Deepak.  Jaime says Joran called him between 4 and 7.  Jaime says he may have missed a call from Joran later because he was sleeping.  Maybe....maybe not.

Is Guido related to Wever Marine Aruba??
[/quote]

LOL.  I think a lot of people have looked at that, but I have not found a direct connection.  Maybe someone else here has.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #789 1/1/09 -
Post by: 2NJSons_Mom on January 02, 2009, 10:14:30 PM
Hi San and AZSunny - Happy New Years to you, and to all the monkeys.



 :smt039

Happy New Year, Sleuth.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #789 1/1/09 -
Post by: Sleuth on January 02, 2009, 10:14:39 PM

the day they were created!!!!

The pics from January 7th ldstlou - not December 30.


Quote
Hotshot answered this one a few times i think. These were not Kyle's responsibility to turn over. They were turned over by either John or Tim. Kyle can't say for sure because he was not  there when they were turned over. Any date he gave would be pure speculation.  This does NOT imply a conspiracy, nor that they were not turned over timely, it only says that it wasn't Kyle's responsibility at the time and he was not the one who turned over the footage...but it was turned over.

Ldtstlou - First you say they were turned over immediately, then you say Kyle can't say for sure - which is it?   If Kyle can't say for sure, how can you say they were turned over, and that they were turned over immediately?  What are you basing the "immediately" on?

I'm asking because you sounded so definite at first, like you personally knew they were turned over immediately, but then shortly after it it sounds like it is just your opinion.   Like Klaas, I would like to know a date as to when the January 7th pictures that Kyle had were turned over to the FBI.

It is not a matter of "he wasn't responsible" - ANYONE that has information should turn it over - I am sure the FBI would much rather get the same thing twice than not at all.  For example,  I remember a time back in 2005 where Klaas and Hammer were working on gathering some information to turn over to the family.  I informed them of the same information that I had already turned over and what I had - I am sure it would not have deterred them from their project, because perhaps they had something additional or a different aspect from their research.

Check every detail, Check it twice.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #789 1/1/09 -
Post by: ldstlou on January 02, 2009, 10:14:52 PM

Define immediately.  When was the footage/pictures turned over.  Do you know this answer.  Can you provide a factual date.

I don't want to hear Kyle said immediately.  I want a date.


the day they were created!!!!


The pics from January 7th ldstlou - not December 30.




Hotshot answered this one a few times i think. These were not Kyle's responsibility to turn over. They were turned over by either John or Tim. Kyle can't say for sure because he was not  there when they were turned over. Any date he gave would be pure speculation.  This does NOT imply a conspiracy, nor that they were not turned over timely, it only says that it wasn't Kyle's responsibility at the time and he was not the one who turned over the footage...but it was turned over.

Then how can you say immediately?

Two issues, screen shots sent the day they were taken, footage at the first opportunity. Immediately as in not months later...sorry I did not clarify my meaning of immediately.

??????

How am I supposed to answer  "???" Can you clarify?


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #789 1/1/09 -
Post by: Keepthefaith on January 02, 2009, 10:17:04 PM

Define immediately.  When was the footage/pictures turned over.  Do you know this answer.  Can you provide a factual date.

I don't want to hear Kyle said immediately.  I want a date.


the day they were created!!!!


The pics from January 7th ldstlou - not December 30.




Hotshot answered this one a few times i think. These were not Kyle's responsibility to turn over. They were turned over by either John or Tim. Kyle can't say for sure because he was not  there when they were turned over. Any date he gave would be pure speculation.  This does NOT imply a conspiracy, nor that they were not turned over timely, it only says that it wasn't Kyle's responsibility at the time and he was not the one who turned over the footage...but it was turned over.

Then how can you say immediately?

Two issues, screen shots sent the day they were taken, footage at the first opportunity. Immediately as in not months later...sorry I did not clarify my meaning of immediately.

??????

How am I supposed to answer  "???" Can you clarify?

What's the date he turned them over.M/D/Y.Please clarify a date.If you don't know,Say "I don't know?"


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #789 1/1/09 -
Post by: hotping on January 02, 2009, 10:17:16 PM

Define immediately.  When was the footage/pictures turned over.  Do you know this answer.  Can you provide a factual date.

I don't want to hear Kyle said immediately.  I want a date.


the day they were created!!!!


The pics from January 7th ldstlou - not December 30.




Hotshot answered this one a few times i think. These were not Kyle's responsibility to turn over. They were turned over by either John or Tim. Kyle can't say for sure because he was not  there when they were turned over. Any date he gave would be pure speculation.  This does NOT imply a conspiracy, nor that they were not turned over timely, it only says that it wasn't Kyle's responsibility at the time and he was not the one who turned over the footage...but it was turned over.

there are two separate issues here, screen shots and the actual footage. Sceen shots were sent daily as intructed by the FBI agents in charge, and the footage was turned over at the first opportunity.
Screen shots sent daily as instructed by the FBI Agents in charge? I did not know that the FBI was involved?    ::MonkeyNoNo::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #789 1/1/09 -
Post by: Sleuth on January 02, 2009, 10:20:00 PM
Hey 2NJ - I hope 2009 treats you well, and that Natalee's family finds the closure they need.

Bye for now monkeys....


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #789 1/1/09 -
Post by: Tamikosmom on January 02, 2009, 10:21:31 PM

Define immediately.  When was the footage/pictures turned over.  Do you know this answer.  Can you provide a factual date.

I don't want to hear Kyle said immediately.  I want a date.


the day they were created!!!!


The pics from January 7th ldstlou - not December 30.




Hotshot answered this one a few times i think. These were not Kyle's responsibility to turn over. They were turned over by either John or Tim. Kyle can't say for sure because he was not  there when they were turned over. Any date he gave would be pure speculation.  This does NOT imply a conspiracy, nor that they were not turned over timely, it only says that it wasn't Kyle's responsibility at the time and he was not the one who turned over the footage...but it was turned over.

I believe that justice for Natalee Holloway and ...  closure for her family dictated that Kyle Kingman had at the very least a moral responsibility to immediately share with the family and FBI ... upon his arrival to the States ... his concerns encompassing the John S./ALE connection in regards to the discovery of the trap/cage and ... the recovery and retrieval of the contents.

Lou ... think about it.  According to Kyle Kingman in his own words ... there is a good possibility that Natalee Holloway's remains were in that cage/trap.  From the perspective of a mother ... please put yourself in Beth Holloway's place.

Janet

+++++


KYLE KINGMAN'S POSTS TO A PRIVATE FORUM

Kyle:
John is not a believer in the trap. He took ALE's word as gospel that it wasn't case related, yet never studied the videos or bothered to inquire further. He had plans on doing business with Aruba and in S. America and he didn't want to hurt any feelings by talks hinting at lack of complete trust and friendship.

Kyle: Notice the end of the skirt is an identical match to the 90 degree angle in the sand. I believe her left arm was outstretched with her legs slightly bent. I did not edit the legs. I believe the tarp was placed over her and tucked around her, or perhaps tied down. I believe there are several rocks laying on the sand which were placed on the tarp, or inside the tarp over her body which explains their unusual location. Either way, the proportions appear promising.

Kyle: I took the proportions of the body form from the head, to shoulder, to a 90 degree angle which I believed to be the hem line of Natalee's skirt. I then took those proportions and matched them to the photo of Natalee with what she was last seen wearing. The proportions matched within an inch from head, to shoulder, to skirt line. Based on this comparison and with what we believed we saw in the Dec 29th video, Tim Miller contacted the family and told them the 99.9% comment. I told Tim not to do anything until we have forensic results back after the site is processed. Jan 7th we sampled the contents and in my opinion we found the skirt under the sand along with the other items The blue fabric was found right where the skirt is pictured. If it isn't her, it will forever haunt me as a major cosmic WTF.





Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #789 1/1/09 -
Post by: ldstlou on January 02, 2009, 10:21:47 PM

the day they were created!!!!

The pics from January 7th ldstlou - not December 30.


Quote
Hotshot answered this one a few times i think. These were not Kyle's responsibility to turn over. They were turned over by either John or Tim. Kyle can't say for sure because he was not  there when they were turned over. Any date he gave would be pure speculation.  This does NOT imply a conspiracy, nor that they were not turned over timely, it only says that it wasn't Kyle's responsibility at the time and he was not the one who turned over the footage...but it was turned over.

Ldtstlou - First you say they were turned over immediately, then you say Kyle can't say for sure - which is it?   If Kyle can't say for sure, how can you say they were turned over, and that they were turned over immediately?  What are you basing the "immediately" on?

I'm asking because you sounded so definite at first, like you personally knew they were turned over immediately, but then shortly after it it sounds like it is just your opinion.   Like Klaas, I would like to know a date as to when the January 7th pictures that Kyle had were turned over to the FBI.

It is not a matter of "he wasn't responsible" - ANYONE that has information should turn it over - I am sure the FBI would much rather get the same thing twice than not at all.  For example,  I remember a time back in 2005 where Klaas and Hammer were working on gathering some information to turn over to the family.  I informed them of the same information that I had already turned over and what I had - I am sure it would not have deterred them from their project, because perhaps they had something additional or a different aspect from their research.

Check every detail, Check it twice.

Let me clarify....is one of the problems people have that the footage was not turned over to the FBI until the Freebirds turned it over to them? So when I say immediately, I mean during the trip, not months later. They were on ship, so at the first opportunity, the footage was turned over.



This was March 18, 2008.  At that time, Kyle assured us he had just recently sent the images from the Dec 30th and Jan 7th dives to the FBI, but had never received a response from them.
 
We later found that to be false.


answer from Kyle:


This is completely incorrect. I had sent the FBI the dive screen shots the day each dive was made. Either John or Tim T. sent out the ROV videos at the first opportunity. This wasn't in my hands.  I think the Freebirds contacted Birmingham FBI and drew a blank.  I sent the screen shots to the senior agent in charge the day they were created, as instructed -Agent edited and edited (Barbados). 


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #789 1/1/09 -
Post by: truthseeker2 on January 02, 2009, 10:21:58 PM
I am going to venture into this little thing here.  (gosh, I hope I don't regret it)

What I understand ldstlou to be saying here is that there was a protocol on the ship where things were turned over to the FBI as they were developed and Kyle was not the one on the ship that was assigned to do that.

Am I right, ldstlou?


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #789 1/1/09 -
Post by: klaasend on January 02, 2009, 10:22:23 PM
LDSTLOU - the problem I have with this is that there is no reason with today's technology that the ROV footage couldn't have been turned over on January 7, 2008 along with the screen shots.  NO REASON.   The footage is nothing more than a video captured on a disc.  The video can be electronically transmitted IMMEDIATELY.

So then why wasn't everything turned over to the FBI immediately?


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #789 1/1/09 -
Post by: klaasend on January 02, 2009, 10:23:34 PM
I am going to venture into this little thing here.  (gosh, I hope I don't regret it)

What I understand ldstlou to be saying here is that there was a protocol on the ship where things were turned over to the FBI as they were developed and Kyle was not the one on the ship that was assigned to do that.

Am I right, ldstlou?

But Kyle said the video footage etc was not turned over to the FBI immediately.  Whether it was his job or not, he relayed that it wasn't done. 


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #789 1/1/09 -
Post by: ldstlou on January 02, 2009, 10:23:45 PM

Define immediately.  When was the footage/pictures turned over.  Do you know this answer.  Can you provide a factual date.

I don't want to hear Kyle said immediately.  I want a date.


the day they were created!!!!


The pics from January 7th ldstlou - not December 30.




Hotshot answered this one a few times i think. These were not Kyle's responsibility to turn over. They were turned over by either John or Tim. Kyle can't say for sure because he was not  there when they were turned over. Any date he gave would be pure speculation.  This does NOT imply a conspiracy, nor that they were not turned over timely, it only says that it wasn't Kyle's responsibility at the time and he was not the one who turned over the footage...but it was turned over.

there are two separate issues here, screen shots and the actual footage. Sceen shots were sent daily as intructed by the FBI agents in charge, and the footage was turned over at the first opportunity.
Screen shots sent daily as instructed by the FBI Agents in charge? I did not know that the FBI was involved?    ::MonkeyNoNo::

They were.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #789 1/1/09 -
Post by: snoopy on January 02, 2009, 10:24:24 PM
ldstlou has it occured to you even once that you have been lied to?  Cause I gotta tell ya I don't believe a word that you are being told.  JMHO.  Kermit has backed up his/her post and also 5 Freebirds have come here to tell us that Kermit is telling the truth.  You are being used, and you really should go back.......slow down.....and read every single word that has been posted for the past month or so.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #789 1/1/09 -
Post by: 2NJSons_Mom on January 02, 2009, 10:24:53 PM
Check every detail, Check it twice.

I don't think anyone should have to clarify what 'immediately' means. 



Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #789 1/1/09 -
Post by: ldstlou on January 02, 2009, 10:25:42 PM
I am going to venture into this little thing here.  (gosh, I hope I don't regret it)

What I understand ldstlou to be saying here is that there was a protocol on the ship where things were turned over to the FBI as they were developed and Kyle was not the one on the ship that was assigned to do that.

Am I right, ldstlou?

that is my understanding


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #789 1/1/09 -
Post by: truthseeker2 on January 02, 2009, 10:26:01 PM
I am going to venture into this little thing here.  (gosh, I hope I don't regret it)

What I understand ldstlou to be saying here is that there was a protocol on the ship where things were turned over to the FBI as they were developed and Kyle was not the one on the ship that was assigned to do that.

Am I right, ldstlou?

But Kyle said the video footage etc was not turned over to the FBI immediately.  Whether it was his job or not, he relayed that it wasn't done. 

Did he say how he knew that?  I mean, if it wasn't his job to submit some of this stuff, how would he know it wasn't done?  Did he say?


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #789 1/1/09 -
Post by: Tamikosmom on January 02, 2009, 10:26:19 PM

Lou ... you are wrong.  The ROV images already have a copyright.

The Natalee's Freebirds' motivations are not self-serving.  At all times Justice for Natalee Holloway and ... closure for her long-suffering family has been where it was at.  The time and effort put into research to produce documents ... to expose the corrupt Aruban investigation that has prevented justice from prevailing from the getgo ... has been a labor of love.

I should know.  I was a Natalee's Freebird prior to making the decision to fly the coop and ...  focus on the SM Natalee forum ... an open forum.

Janet
________

Kermit
Re: Natalee Case Discussion #786 12/17/08 -
« Reply #544 on: December 19, 2008, 06:52:12 PM »


PERHAPS KYLE VIOLATED THE COPYRIGHT HIMSELF

Kyle said
: "She [BETH] needs to know exactly what we found in the proper timing. The way to do that would be through Tim Trahan and I. I can arrange any meeting with him. He represents the owner and the rights to the data, in this case, Louis S. I have everything but I don't want to go around him for chain of custody reasons, professional courtesy, and friendship."
 
The next step:
I will soon propose a meeting with Beth and other family members, myself, Tim Trahan, Peter DeVries, and whomever else necessary to go over the ROV video, contents, and case status. I would like a couple people very familiar with the case documents also present to help connect dots during the meeting. I would prefer meeting towards the end of April or mid-May to allow adequate time for things to shake themselves out if is going to. If necessary, I have an ABC (20/20) and CBS (early show) film crew ready and willing to take part in such a meeting should it require press coverage. I've already had a meeting with ABC about this and they are "definitely interested" at the executive level. We met in mid-Feb about this already. The question becomes timing, who needs to be there, and whether or not it's covered by the press. I prefer not, but it may be useful. DeVries doesn't need to be there in my opinion but he's good for ratings and helps ABC be cooperative if needed.

He certainly is a planner
[edited to protect the individual] needs to be called and ask to request the removal of the post by either her
or PI to Klaas. 

http://scaredmonkeys.net/index.php?topic=4246.msg592533;topicseen#msg592533


See Janet, I don't see a cover-up. I see Kyle disclosing everything. Where is the cover-up?


jen3560
Re: Natalee Case Discussion #788 12/31/08 -
« Reply #54 on: December 31, 2008, 04:36:13 PM »


KeeptheFaith and Janet,

After we discovered this information had been withheld from US authorities, we contacted legal counsel, and were advised to keep our distance from Persistence crew members and benefactors - that is when and why Kyle was banned.

That occurred the end of September.

http://scaredmonkeys.net/index.php?topic=4328.msg605250#msg605250


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #789 1/1/09 -
Post by: wreck on January 02, 2009, 10:27:34 PM
LDSTLOU,
Again, I think you have failed to follow EVERY detail and words of Kyle himself. Kyle has stated that John S. had NO interest in the trap -- in fact he told Kyle "to never bring up the trap" again! Kyle told Freebirds that John S. has NEW business dealings in Aruba. Beth's brother (private eye) was flabbergasted to find out about the Jan. 7th pics in MARCH! That is NOT IMMEDIATELY. Kyle had no responsibilty to turn over ALL pics????? Well, he sure had responsibility to SELL the pics in February!


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #789 1/1/09 -
Post by: ldstlou on January 02, 2009, 10:28:29 PM
LDSTLOU - the problem I have with this is that there is no reason with today's technology that the ROV footage couldn't have been turned over on January 7, 2008 along with the screen shots.  NO REASON.   The footage is nothing more than a video captured on a disc.  The video can be electronically transmitted IMMEDIATELY.

So then why wasn't everything turned over to the FBI immediately?

ok...define immediate Klaas...are we talking seconds after..minutes after..a day after? They were working with two FBI agents from Barbados. The footage was turned over to them. The exact moment? Kyle does not know, but it certainly was not withheld from them.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #789 1/1/09 -
Post by: truthseeker2 on January 02, 2009, 10:28:43 PM
ldstlou has it occured to you even once that you have been lied to?  Cause I gotta tell ya I don't believe a word that you are being told.  JMHO.  Kermit has backed up his/her post and also 5 Freebirds have come here to tell us that Kermit is telling the truth.  You are being used, and you really should go back.......slow down.....and read every single word that has been posted for the past month or so.

I know this was not directed to me, but you are asking a fair question and I'm sure she will answer.

But, has it ocurred to anyone that this entire thing may just have been one huge misunderstanding of each other's initial posts at the Freebirds site?

(I'm going to look for my shield)


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #789 1/1/09 -
Post by: klaasend on January 02, 2009, 10:29:32 PM
I am going to venture into this little thing here.  (gosh, I hope I don't regret it)

What I understand ldstlou to be saying here is that there was a protocol on the ship where things were turned over to the FBI as they were developed and Kyle was not the one on the ship that was assigned to do that.

Am I right, ldstlou?

But Kyle said the video footage etc was not turned over to the FBI immediately.  Whether it was his job or not, he relayed that it wasn't done. 

Did he say how he knew that?  I mean, if it wasn't his job to submit some of this stuff, how would he know it wasn't done?  Did he say?

You would have to ask Kyle those questions. 


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #789 1/1/09 -
Post by: Sleuth on January 02, 2009, 10:29:36 PM
Ldstlou - I was just logging off but saw you responded.  I cam back to say Thank You for responding.  I can see now why/how you were responding the way you did.  I also see I inadvertantly put an extra "t" in you name during my last post - I'm sorry about that.

Bye now monkeys.



Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #789 1/1/09 -
Post by: Tamikosmom on January 02, 2009, 10:29:40 PM
LDSTLOU - the problem I have with this is that there is no reason with today's technology that the ROV footage couldn't have been turned over on January 7, 2008 along with the screen shots.  NO REASON.   The footage is nothing more than a video captured on a disc.  The video can be electronically transmitted IMMEDIATELY.

So then why wasn't everything turned over to the FBI immediately?


KYLE KINGMAN'S POSTS TO A PRIVATE FORUM

Kyle: I've talked with Peter Shouten numerous times back in February. He hasn't seen anything but knows about the blue fabrics. DeVries and Endemol was interested in purchasing the ROV footage and I was working between them, ABC, and CBS to strike a deal.

Kyle: Louis is currently working with someone who I do not know to put together some documentary on the case, the way it was handled, and what happened during the search. I learned this from Tim T. yesterday. Louis was sold on the idea that it will make him a lot of money.



Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #789 1/1/09 -
Post by: klaasend on January 02, 2009, 10:31:38 PM
LDSTLOU - the problem I have with this is that there is no reason with today's technology that the ROV footage couldn't have been turned over on January 7, 2008 along with the screen shots.  NO REASON.   The footage is nothing more than a video captured on a disc.  The video can be electronically transmitted IMMEDIATELY.

So then why wasn't everything turned over to the FBI immediately?

ok...define immediate Klaas...are we talking seconds after..minutes after..a day after? They were working with two FBI agents from Barbados. The footage was turned over to them. The exact moment? Kyle does not know, but it certainly was not withheld from them.

Immediately was your word, you define it.   YOU said the footage was turned over after and I'm simply stating there is really no reason for any delay.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #789 1/1/09 -
Post by: ldstlou on January 02, 2009, 10:35:04 PM
ldstlou has it occured to you even once that you have been lied to?  Cause I gotta tell ya I don't believe a word that you are being told.  JMHO.  Kermit has backed up his/her post and also 5 Freebirds have come here to tell us that Kermit is telling the truth.  You are being used, and you really should go back.......slow down.....and read every single word that has been posted for the past month or so.

I know this was not directed to me, but you are asking a fair question and I'm sure she will answer.

But, has it ocurred to anyone that this entire thing may just have been one huge misunderstanding of each other's initial posts at the Freebirds site?

(I'm going to look for my shield)

thank you truth...this is what I have stated from day one. That I believe that kermit believes there was a conspiracy involving members of the Persistence. I never said she was lying, not once. I believe she believes that.

However I don't.
I believe after Kyle found out how long it took the samples to get to the FBI and the results, he started putting things together in his head and had some major questions about how the ALE handled things and whether they were DUPED by the ALE or not. He still is not sure. He has his doubts just the same as everyone else about what was in that cage and regrets they will never know now. But he never said John was in on anything, he may have believed at one time that John trusted the ALE more than he should have...and those were Kyle's OPINIONS not FACTS! But that is a far cry from the members of the Persistence being involved in a conspiracy with the ALE and moving evidence from a cage to a pond.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #789 1/1/09 -
Post by: truthseeker2 on January 02, 2009, 10:35:34 PM
I am going to venture into this little thing here.  (gosh, I hope I don't regret it)

What I understand ldstlou to be saying here is that there was a protocol on the ship where things were turned over to the FBI as they were developed and Kyle was not the one on the ship that was assigned to do that.

Am I right, ldstlou?

But Kyle said the video footage etc was not turned over to the FBI immediately.  Whether it was his job or not, he relayed that it wasn't done. 

Did he say how he knew that?  I mean, if it wasn't his job to submit some of this stuff, how would he know it wasn't done?  Did he say?

You would have to ask Kyle those questions. 

Wouldn't the Freebirds and/or Kermit know if he said to them HOW he knew?  Maybe they will tell us.  I don't mean to press you about it.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #789 1/1/09 -
Post by: ldstlou on January 02, 2009, 10:36:36 PM
Ldstlou - I was just logging off but saw you responded.  I cam back to say Thank You for responding.  I can see now why/how you were responding the way you did.  I also see I inadvertantly put an extra "t" in you name during my last post - I'm sorry about that.

Bye now monkeys.



thanks, I type slow!! lol


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #789 1/1/09 -
Post by: ldstlou on January 02, 2009, 10:38:12 PM
I am going to venture into this little thing here.  (gosh, I hope I don't regret it)

What I understand ldstlou to be saying here is that there was a protocol on the ship where things were turned over to the FBI as they were developed and Kyle was not the one on the ship that was assigned to do that.

Am I right, ldstlou?

But Kyle said the video footage etc was not turned over to the FBI immediately.  Whether it was his job or not, he relayed that it wasn't done. 

Did he say how he knew that?  I mean, if it wasn't his job to submit some of this stuff, how would he know it wasn't done?  Did he say?

You would have to ask Kyle those questions. 

Wouldn't the Freebirds and/or Kermit know if he said to them HOW he knew?  Maybe they will tell us.  I don't mean to press you about it.

and this is exactly what I have been meaning when I say taken out of context. What was the conversation taking place when these posts were made? We don't know.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #789 1/1/09 -
Post by: truthseeker2 on January 02, 2009, 10:40:55 PM
ldstlou has it occured to you even once that you have been lied to?  Cause I gotta tell ya I don't believe a word that you are being told.  JMHO.  Kermit has backed up his/her post and also 5 Freebirds have come here to tell us that Kermit is telling the truth.  You are being used, and you really should go back.......slow down.....and read every single word that has been posted for the past month or so.

I know this was not directed to me, but you are asking a fair question and I'm sure she will answer.

But, has it ocurred to anyone that this entire thing may just have been one huge misunderstanding of each other's initial posts at the Freebirds site?

(I'm going to look for my shield)

thank you truth...this is what I have stated from day one. That I believe that kermit believes there was a conspiracy involving members of the Persistence. I never said she was lying, not once. I believe she believes that.

However I don't.
I believe after Kyle found out how long it took the samples to get to the FBI and the results, he started putting things together in his head and had some major questions about how the ALE handled things and whether they were DUPED by the ALE or not. He still is not sure. He has his doubts just the same as everyone else about what was in that cage and regrets they will never know now. But he never said John was in on anything, he may have believed at one time that John trusted the ALE more than he should have...and those were Kyle's OPINIONS not FACTS! But that is a far cry from the members of the Persistence being involved in a conspiracy with the ALE and moving evidence from a cage to a pond.

Thanks for explaining that.  I have to honest, the last several days I have tried to just scroll through a lot of this stuff.  I know that anything we have seen, the FBI has seen and I'm sure the FBI has even more than that.

I wasn't on that ship, nor was I at the Freebird site so I cannot add much to the converstion.  I just want to see us all get back to working together.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #789 1/1/09 -
Post by: ldstlou on January 02, 2009, 10:42:05 PM
LDSTLOU,
Again, I think you have failed to follow EVERY detail and words of Kyle himself. Kyle has stated that John S. had NO interest in the trap -- in fact he told Kyle "to never bring up the trap" again! Kyle told Freebirds that John S. has NEW business dealings in Aruba. Beth's brother (private eye) was flabbergasted to find out about the Jan. 7th pics in MARCH! That is NOT IMMEDIATELY. Kyle had no responsibilty to turn over ALL pics????? Well, he sure had responsibility to SELL the pics in February!

John did not believe Natalee was in that trap. They had other targets they had located and he wanted to focus on the other targets that were possibilites. Remember, they identified quite a few other possible targets that they were eager to look into. It wasn't because he was hiding anything in the trap, he felt they had eliminated the possibility that it was Natalee and wanet to get to other possibilities.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #789 1/1/09 -
Post by: San on January 02, 2009, 10:42:42 PM
I am going to venture into this little thing here.  (gosh, I hope I don't regret it)

What I understand ldstlou to be saying here is that there was a protocol on the ship where things were turned over to the FBI as they were developed and Kyle was not the one on the ship that was assigned to do that.

Am I right, ldstlou?

that is my understanding

So what you are saying is that the FBI was there on the ship the entire time including January 7th and they saw the pictures.

So if they saw these pictures what is the big deal.

Is it because Kyle released information he should not have.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #789 1/1/09 -
Post by: Keepthefaith on January 02, 2009, 10:45:17 PM
LDSTLOU,
Again, I think you have failed to follow EVERY detail and words of Kyle himself. Kyle has stated that John S. had NO interest in the trap -- in fact he told Kyle "to never bring up the trap" again! Kyle told Freebirds that John S. has NEW business dealings in Aruba. Beth's brother (private eye) was flabbergasted to find out about the Jan. 7th pics in MARCH! That is NOT IMMEDIATELY. Kyle had no responsibilty to turn over ALL pics????? Well, he sure had responsibility to SELL the pics in February!

John did not believe Natalee was in that trap. They had other targets they had located and he wanted to focus on the other targets that were possibilites. Remember, they identified quite a few other possible targets that they were eager to look into. It wasn't because he was hiding anything in the trap, he felt they had eliminated the possibility that it was Natalee and wanet to get to other possibilities.

How did he(Silvetti) come to that conclusion?


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #789 1/1/09 -
Post by: ldstlou on January 02, 2009, 10:46:05 PM
I am going to venture into this little thing here.  (gosh, I hope I don't regret it)

What I understand ldstlou to be saying here is that there was a protocol on the ship where things were turned over to the FBI as they were developed and Kyle was not the one on the ship that was assigned to do that.

Am I right, ldstlou?

that is my understanding

So what you are saying is that the FBI was there on the ship the entire time including January 7th and they saw the pictures.

So if they saw these pictures what is the big deal.

Is it because Kyle released information he should not have.

I am not sure what you are asking me? What is the big deal to me?


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #789 1/1/09 -
Post by: wreck on January 02, 2009, 10:48:22 PM
I am going to venture into this little thing here.  (gosh, I hope I don't regret it)

What I understand ldstlou to be saying here is that there was a protocol on the ship where things were turned over to the FBI as they were developed and Kyle was not the one on the ship that was assigned to do that.

Am I right, ldstlou?

that is my understanding

So what you are saying is that the FBI was there on the ship the entire time including January 7th and they saw the pictures.

So if they saw these pictures what is the big deal.

Is it because Kyle released information he should not have.

I am not sure what you are asking me? What is the big deal to me?
Surely you aren't trying to tell us the FBI was physically aboard the Persistence on Dec. 29th to Jan 7th?!?


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #789 1/1/09 -
Post by: truthseeker2 on January 02, 2009, 10:50:08 PM
I am going to venture into this little thing here.  (gosh, I hope I don't regret it)

What I understand ldstlou to be saying here is that there was a protocol on the ship where things were turned over to the FBI as they were developed and Kyle was not the one on the ship that was assigned to do that.

Am I right, ldstlou?

that is my understanding

So what you are saying is that the FBI was there on the ship the entire time including January 7th and they saw the pictures.

So if they saw these pictures what is the big deal.

Is it because Kyle released information he should not have.

I am not sure what you are asking me? What is the big deal to me?
Surely you aren't trying to tell us the FBI was physically aboard the Persistence on Dec. 29th to Jan 7th?!?

Well, they wouldn't have to be onboard to receive the data.  It's quite easy to encrypt and transmit data.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #789 1/1/09 -
Post by: San on January 02, 2009, 10:51:47 PM
I am going to venture into this little thing here.  (gosh, I hope I don't regret it)

What I understand ldstlou to be saying here is that there was a protocol on the ship where things were turned over to the FBI as they were developed and Kyle was not the one on the ship that was assigned to do that.

Am I right, ldstlou?

that is my understanding

So what you are saying is that the FBI was there on the ship the entire time including January 7th and they saw the pictures.

So if they saw these pictures what is the big deal.

Is it because Kyle released information he should not have.

I am not sure what you are asking me? What is the big deal to me?

In other words if these pictures were already released to the FBI the time he said why is he so upset.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #789 1/1/09 -
Post by: wreck on January 02, 2009, 10:52:01 PM
I am going to venture into this little thing here.  (gosh, I hope I don't regret it)

What I understand ldstlou to be saying here is that there was a protocol on the ship where things were turned over to the FBI as they were developed and Kyle was not the one on the ship that was assigned to do that.

Am I right, ldstlou?

that is my understanding

So what you are saying is that the FBI was there on the ship the entire time including January 7th and they saw the pictures.

So if they saw these pictures what is the big deal.

Is it because Kyle released information he should not have.

I am not sure what you are asking me? What is the big deal to me?
Surely you aren't trying to tell us the FBI was physically aboard the Persistence on Dec. 29th to Jan 7th?!?

Well, they wouldn't have to be onboard to receive the data.  It's quite easy to encrypt and transmit data.
That is what San was asking.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #789 1/1/09 -
Post by: ldstlou on January 02, 2009, 10:53:21 PM
Here is how Kyle explained it to me.

When he inquired about the results of the fabric analysis, he became highly suspicious because of the length of time it took ALE to get it to the FBI. I am sorry, I don't remember the amount of time now...but way out of proportion to how long it should have taken. So looking back...everything now seems suspect to him. He says it could have been 3 things

1) a serious of coincidences which would be the ultimate cosmic WTF.
2) a cover-up by the ALE in which they duped the members of the Persistence to do so.
3) an investigation.

He stated an investigation could look very much like a cover-up if you are watching it go down.

He still to this day does not know which of the three it was. He asked the Freebirds...this is my understanding, to help him sort it all out. Much of his posts that were copied here was opinion, speculation...Kyle attempting to noodle it all out. Never was he saying that members of the Persistence were involved in a conspiracy.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #789 1/1/09 -
Post by: truthseeker2 on January 02, 2009, 10:53:54 PM
I am going to venture into this little thing here.  (gosh, I hope I don't regret it)

What I understand ldstlou to be saying here is that there was a protocol on the ship where things were turned over to the FBI as they were developed and Kyle was not the one on the ship that was assigned to do that.

Am I right, ldstlou?

that is my understanding

So what you are saying is that the FBI was there on the ship the entire time including January 7th and they saw the pictures.

So if they saw these pictures what is the big deal.

Is it because Kyle released information he should not have.

I am not sure what you are asking me? What is the big deal to me?
Surely you aren't trying to tell us the FBI was physically aboard the Persistence on Dec. 29th to Jan 7th?!?

Well, they wouldn't have to be onboard to receive the data.  It's quite easy to encrypt and transmit data.
That is what San was asking.

I thought you were asking too.  sorry.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #789 1/1/09 -
Post by: Keepthefaith on January 02, 2009, 10:54:35 PM
LDSTLOU,
Again, I think you have failed to follow EVERY detail and words of Kyle himself. Kyle has stated that John S. had NO interest in the trap -- in fact he told Kyle "to never bring up the trap" again! Kyle told Freebirds that John S. has NEW business dealings in Aruba. Beth's brother (private eye) was flabbergasted to find out about the Jan. 7th pics in MARCH! That is NOT IMMEDIATELY. Kyle had no responsibilty to turn over ALL pics????? Well, he sure had responsibility to SELL the pics in February!

John did not believe Natalee was in that trap. They had other targets they had located and he wanted to focus on the other targets that were possibilites. Remember, they identified quite a few other possible targets that they were eager to look into. It wasn't because he was hiding anything in the trap, he felt they had eliminated the possibility that it was Natalee and wanet to get to other possibilities.

How did he(Silvetti) come to that conclusion?

How did he eliminate Natalee as a possibilty when Kyle thought differently???


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #789 1/1/09 -
Post by: ldstlou on January 02, 2009, 10:55:54 PM
I am going to venture into this little thing here.  (gosh, I hope I don't regret it)

What I understand ldstlou to be saying here is that there was a protocol on the ship where things were turned over to the FBI as they were developed and Kyle was not the one on the ship that was assigned to do that.

Am I right, ldstlou?

that is my understanding

So what you are saying is that the FBI was there on the ship the entire time including January 7th and they saw the pictures.

So if they saw these pictures what is the big deal.

Is it because Kyle released information he should not have.

I am not sure what you are asking me? What is the big deal to me?
Surely you aren't trying to tell us the FBI was physically aboard the Persistence on Dec. 29th to Jan 7th?!?

I didn't ask that question so I don't know if they were on board or not. I know that there were members of Quantico on board.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #789 1/1/09 -
Post by: wreck on January 02, 2009, 10:56:10 PM
I am going to venture into this little thing here.  (gosh, I hope I don't regret it)

What I understand ldstlou to be saying here is that there was a protocol on the ship where things were turned over to the FBI as they were developed and Kyle was not the one on the ship that was assigned to do that.

Am I right, ldstlou?

that is my understanding

So what you are saying is that the FBI was there on the ship the entire time including January 7th and they saw the pictures.

So if they saw these pictures what is the big deal.

Is it because Kyle released information he should not have.

I am not sure what you are asking me? What is the big deal to me?
Surely you aren't trying to tell us the FBI was physically aboard the Persistence on Dec. 29th to Jan 7th?!?

Well, they wouldn't have to be onboard to receive the data.  It's quite easy to encrypt and transmit data.
That is what San was asking.

I thought you were asking too.  sorry.
I was repeating san's question because Lisa did not answer to it.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #789 1/1/09 -
Post by: truthseeker2 on January 02, 2009, 10:58:19 PM
Surely you aren't trying to tell us the FBI was physically aboard the Persistence on Dec. 29th to Jan 7th?!?

Well, they wouldn't have to be onboard to receive the data.  It's quite easy to encrypt and transmit data.
That is what San was asking.

I thought you were asking too.  sorry.
[/quote]
I was repeating san's question because Lisa did not answer to it.
[/quote]

Gottcha.  Sometimes these quote stacks get a little busy.  I lost track for a moment there.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #789 1/1/09 -
Post by: wreck on January 02, 2009, 10:59:08 PM
I think we need Kermit, Jen, or wingnut to come back and re-state the timelines as they know it.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #789 1/1/09 -
Post by: Tamikosmom on January 02, 2009, 10:59:52 PM
LDSTLOU,
Again, I think you have failed to follow EVERY detail and words of Kyle himself. Kyle has stated that John S. had NO interest in the trap -- in fact he told Kyle "to never bring up the trap" again! Kyle told Freebirds that John S. has NEW business dealings in Aruba. Beth's brother (private eye) was flabbergasted to find out about the Jan. 7th pics in MARCH! That is NOT IMMEDIATELY. Kyle had no responsibilty to turn over ALL pics????? Well, he sure had responsibility to SELL the pics in February!

John did not believe Natalee was in that trap. They had other targets they had located and he wanted to focus on the other targets that were possibilites. Remember, they identified quite a few other possible targets that they were eager to look into. It wasn't because he was hiding anything in the trap, he felt they had eliminated the possibility that it was Natalee and wanet to get to other possibilities.

Lou ... the following words of Kyle Kingman says it all in regards to John Silvetti.  Have a boo at the ROV images.  John S. had a responsibility to Natalee Holloway, her family and those who donated to the Persistence undertaking ... not to dismiss the contents of that cage/trap ... not to turn it over unchallenged to the enemy.  An FBI agent should have been on board the Persistence to observed the chain of custody.

Janet

_______


KYLE KINGMAN - PRIVATE FORUM

Kyle: I did not feel the same and we had a major difference in opinion. He [John Silvetti] was the one who never pressed ALE to be completely open with us with the trap evidence. I would have forced them to. However, John was the one paying my invoices so I was forced to sit back and hope for the best.

Kyle: John told me then he didn't want to hear me ever mention the trap again.

Kyle: John definitely believed the Arubans at their every word

Kyle: John is not a believer in the trap. He took ALE's word as gospel that it wasn't case related, yet never studied the videos or bothered to inquire further. He had plans on doing business with Aruba and in S. America and he didn't want to hurt any feelings by talks hinting at lack of complete trust and friendship.


THE ROV IMAGES

Kermit
Re: Natalee Case Discussion #778 11/23/08 -
« Reply #408 on: November 24, 2008, 03:59:08 PM »


http://scaredmonkeys.net/index.php?topic=4173.msg555618#msg555618
 
 
Kermit
Re: Natalee Case Discussion #778 11/23/08 -
« Reply #410 on: November 24, 2008, 04:01:55 PM »


Photos given to the FBI sent to Dave and Robin posted on the internet are NOT the
photos posted above.  These were not given to the FBI until recently.
http://scaredmonkeys.net/index.php?topic=4173.msg555621#msg555621


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #789 1/1/09 -
Post by: klaasend on January 02, 2009, 11:00:01 PM
LDSTLOU,
Again, I think you have failed to follow EVERY detail and words of Kyle himself. Kyle has stated that John S. had NO interest in the trap -- in fact he told Kyle "to never bring up the trap" again! Kyle told Freebirds that John S. has NEW business dealings in Aruba. Beth's brother (private eye) was flabbergasted to find out about the Jan. 7th pics in MARCH! That is NOT IMMEDIATELY. Kyle had no responsibilty to turn over ALL pics????? Well, he sure had responsibility to SELL the pics in February!

John did not believe Natalee was in that trap. They had other targets they had located and he wanted to focus on the other targets that were possibilites. Remember, they identified quite a few other possible targets that they were eager to look into. It wasn't because he was hiding anything in the trap, he felt they had eliminated the possibility that it was Natalee and wanet to get to other possibilities.

Eager to look into, so eager they begged for donations one day while they were packing to leave at the same time. 


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #789 1/1/09 -
Post by: Keepthefaith on January 02, 2009, 11:00:14 PM
LDSTLOU,
Again, I think you have failed to follow EVERY detail and words of Kyle himself. Kyle has stated that John S. had NO interest in the trap -- in fact he told Kyle "to never bring up the trap" again! Kyle told Freebirds that John S. has NEW business dealings in Aruba. Beth's brother (private eye) was flabbergasted to find out about the Jan. 7th pics in MARCH! That is NOT IMMEDIATELY. Kyle had no responsibilty to turn over ALL pics????? Well, he sure had responsibility to SELL the pics in February!

John did not believe Natalee was in that trap. They had other targets they had located and he wanted to focus on the other targets that were possibilites. Remember, they identified quite a few other possible targets that they were eager to look into. It wasn't because he was hiding anything in the trap, he felt they had eliminated the possibility that it was Natalee and wanet to get to other possibilities.

How did he(Silvetti) come to that conclusion?

How did he eliminate Natalee as a possibilty when Kyle thought differently???

How did Silvetti come to the conclusion it wasn't Natalee?


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #789 1/1/09 -
Post by: billb's daughter on January 02, 2009, 11:00:43 PM
I am going to venture into this little thing here.  (gosh, I hope I don't regret it)

What I understand ldstlou to be saying here is that there was a protocol on the ship where things were turned over to the FBI as they were developed and Kyle was not the one on the ship that was assigned to do that.

Am I right, ldstlou?

that is my understanding

So what you are saying is that the FBI was there on the ship the entire time including January 7th and they saw the pictures.

So if they saw these pictures what is the big deal.

Is it because Kyle released information he should not have.

I am not sure what you are asking me? What is the big deal to me?
Surely you aren't trying to tell us the FBI was physically aboard the Persistence on Dec. 29th to Jan 7th?!?

Well, they wouldn't have to be onboard to receive the data.  It's quite easy to encrypt and transmit data.
This sure seems to be going in a circle and I'll be darned as to the reason why....
But, as stated, FBI didn't have to be onboard to receive the ROV videos, so why wasn't the ROV videos encrypted and transmitted the day they were made? I'm sure the FBI would not set up a protocol that only insisted screen captures were sent daily without covering or excluding videos....That wouldn't make any sense....
Kyle pretty much painted the picture that he knew the ROV video was not sent to FBI or family. He stated he was trying to strike a deal for financial gains....When Freebirds discovered that Kyle had not sent the ROV video in September 2008 they cut ties with him on advice of legal consul....Kermit exposed it along with help from Freebirds....
Pretty clear to me.....


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #789 1/1/09 -
Post by: Magnolia on January 02, 2009, 11:01:15 PM
Remember....Kyle said that he had not turned anything over to the
FBI since DEC 29th.

Then he was busy trying to sell the ROV footage in Feb.

I do not believe for one minute that there were agents from
Barbados on the ship or working with the crew.  That would have
come up long before now.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #789 1/1/09 -
Post by: ldstlou on January 02, 2009, 11:02:52 PM
I am going to venture into this little thing here.  (gosh, I hope I don't regret it)

What I understand ldstlou to be saying here is that there was a protocol on the ship where things were turned over to the FBI as they were developed and Kyle was not the one on the ship that was assigned to do that.

Am I right, ldstlou?

that is my understanding

So what you are saying is that the FBI was there on the ship the entire time including January 7th and they saw the pictures.

So if they saw these pictures what is the big deal.

Is it because Kyle released information he should not have.

I am not sure what you are asking me? What is the big deal to me?
Surely you aren't trying to tell us the FBI was physically aboard the Persistence on Dec. 29th to Jan 7th?!?

Well, they wouldn't have to be onboard to receive the data.  It's quite easy to encrypt and transmit data.
That is what San was asking.

I thought you were asking too.  sorry.
I was repeating san's question because Lisa did not answer to it.

I don't know. I didn't ask. I know Quantico was on board on the 29th.

Look bottom line, I spoke to Jug and Kyle and in my heart don't believe the members of the Persistence were involved in a cover-up.

Many of you have spoken to kermit and believe there was a cover-up on the part of the members of the Persistence.

I think it is fair to say everyone here has the utmost respect and trust in Tim Miller. Many here know him well enough to ask him his opinion. I think Tim's view on what happened and what was or was not found would go a long way to help everyone figure this out.

Kyle feels betrayed. No way is he going to come here and answer questions.

Do a google search on John Silvetti and you will find pages of SM references of him involved in a conspiracy...I would not offer the courtesy of an interview if I were him..jmho.

But I would think Tim Miller would be willing if Red or Dana asked him to.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #789 1/1/09 -
Post by: ldstlou on January 02, 2009, 11:03:37 PM
Remember....Kyle said that he had not turned anything over to the
FBI since DEC 29th.

Then he was busy trying to sell the ROV footage in Feb.

I do not believe for one minute that there were agents from
Barbados on the ship or working with the crew.  That would have
come up long before now.

They were involved and he gave Jug the names.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #789 1/1/09 -
Post by: Anna on January 02, 2009, 11:04:27 PM
Remember....Kyle said that he had not turned anything over to the
FBI since DEC 29th.

Then he was busy trying to sell the ROV footage in Feb.

I do not believe for one minute that there were agents from
Barbados on the ship or working with the crew.  That would have
come up long before now.


It would have.  But wouldn't they really need to be on the ALE dive boat to get access to the actual contents of the trap?  That's who had it, right?


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #789 1/1/09 -
Post by: Keepthefaith on January 02, 2009, 11:05:04 PM
LDSTLOU,
Again, I think you have failed to follow EVERY detail and words of Kyle himself. Kyle has stated that John S. had NO interest in the trap -- in fact he told Kyle "to never bring up the trap" again! Kyle told Freebirds that John S. has NEW business dealings in Aruba. Beth's brother (private eye) was flabbergasted to find out about the Jan. 7th pics in MARCH! That is NOT IMMEDIATELY. Kyle had no responsibilty to turn over ALL pics????? Well, he sure had responsibility to SELL the pics in February!

John did not believe Natalee was in that trap. They had other targets they had located and he wanted to focus on the other targets that were possibilites. Remember, they identified quite a few other possible targets that they were eager to look into. It wasn't because he was hiding anything in the trap, he felt they had eliminated the possibility that it was Natalee and wanet to get to other possibilities.

How did he(Silvetti) come to that conclusion?

How did he eliminate Natalee as a possibilty when Kyle thought differently???

How did Silvetti come to the conclusion it wasn't Natalee?

Care to answer lisa??? ::MonkeyCool::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #789 1/1/09 -
Post by: truthseeker2 on January 02, 2009, 11:06:14 PM
I am going to venture into this little thing here.  (gosh, I hope I don't regret it)

What I understand ldstlou to be saying here is that there was a protocol on the ship where things were turned over to the FBI as they were developed and Kyle was not the one on the ship that was assigned to do that.

Am I right, ldstlou?

that is my understanding

So what you are saying is that the FBI was there on the ship the entire time including January 7th and they saw the pictures.

So if they saw these pictures what is the big deal.

Is it because Kyle released information he should not have.

I am not sure what you are asking me? What is the big deal to me?
Surely you aren't trying to tell us the FBI was physically aboard the Persistence on Dec. 29th to Jan 7th?!?

Well, they wouldn't have to be onboard to receive the data.  It's quite easy to encrypt and transmit data.
This sure seems to be going in a circle and I'll be darned as to the reason why....
But, as stated, FBI didn't have to be onboard to receive the ROV videos, so why wasn't the ROV videos encrypted and transmitted the day they were made? I'm sure the FBI would not set up a protocol that only insisted screen captures were sent daily without covering or excluding videos....That wouldn't make any sense....
Kyle pretty much painted the picture that he knew the ROV video was not sent to FBI or family. He stated he was trying to strike a deal for financial gains....When Freebirds discovered that Kyle had not sent the ROV video in September 2008 they cut ties with him on advice of legal consul....Kermit exposed it along with help from Freebirds....
Pretty clear to me.....

From what I understood in the earlier posts, it was not Kyle's function to do that.  He had things he provided as assigned and the ROV images were assigned to someone else to provide.  My question earlier was, if it wasn't assigned to him to do, how would Kyle know if it was done or not?


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #789 1/1/09 -
Post by: ldstlou on January 02, 2009, 11:06:46 PM
I think we need Kermit, Jen, or wingnut to come back and re-state the timelines as they know it.

I think we need Tim Miller to explain it to us.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #789 1/1/09 -
Post by: ldstlou on January 02, 2009, 11:08:20 PM
LDSTLOU,
Again, I think you have failed to follow EVERY detail and words of Kyle himself. Kyle has stated that John S. had NO interest in the trap -- in fact he told Kyle "to never bring up the trap" again! Kyle told Freebirds that John S. has NEW business dealings in Aruba. Beth's brother (private eye) was flabbergasted to find out about the Jan. 7th pics in MARCH! That is NOT IMMEDIATELY. Kyle had no responsibilty to turn over ALL pics????? Well, he sure had responsibility to SELL the pics in February!

John did not believe Natalee was in that trap. They had other targets they had located and he wanted to focus on the other targets that were possibilites. Remember, they identified quite a few other possible targets that they were eager to look into. It wasn't because he was hiding anything in the trap, he felt they had eliminated the possibility that it was Natalee and wanet to get to other possibilities.

How did he(Silvetti) come to that conclusion?

How did he eliminate Natalee as a possibilty when Kyle thought differently???

How did Silvetti come to the conclusion it wasn't Natalee?

Care to answer lisa??? ::MonkeyCool::

I have been bashed and had hostile questions thrown at me for over a month now...and you wonder why I am so sarcastic at this point..so no..I won't answer questions that are thrown at me with sarcasm.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #789 1/1/09 -
Post by: billb's daughter on January 02, 2009, 11:09:40 PM
I think we need Kermit, Jen, or wingnut to come back and re-state the timelines as they know it.

I think we need Tim Miller to explain it to us.
Tim Miller was not on the persistence when the ROV video was taken on jan 7...John S. put him off the ship on Dec 30th....


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #789 1/1/09 -
Post by: Keepthefaith on January 02, 2009, 11:10:16 PM
LDSTLOU,
Again, I think you have failed to follow EVERY detail and words of Kyle himself. Kyle has stated that John S. had NO interest in the trap -- in fact he told Kyle "to never bring up the trap" again! Kyle told Freebirds that John S. has NEW business dealings in Aruba. Beth's brother (private eye) was flabbergasted to find out about the Jan. 7th pics in MARCH! That is NOT IMMEDIATELY. Kyle had no responsibilty to turn over ALL pics????? Well, he sure had responsibility to SELL the pics in February!

John did not believe Natalee was in that trap. They had other targets they had located and he wanted to focus on the other targets that were possibilites. Remember, they identified quite a few other possible targets that they were eager to look into. It wasn't because he was hiding anything in the trap, he felt they had eliminated the possibility that it was Natalee and wanet to get to other possibilities.

How did he(Silvetti) come to that conclusion?

How did he eliminate Natalee as a possibilty when Kyle thought differently???

How did Silvetti come to the conclusion it wasn't Natalee?

Care to answer lisa??? ::MonkeyCool::

I have been bashed and had hostile questions thrown at me for over a month now...and you wonder why I am so sarcastic at this point..so no..I won't answer questions that are thrown at me with sarcasm.

I wouldn't answer that as well!You said it not me!How would Silvetti come to such a conclusion??


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #789 1/1/09 -
Post by: klaasend on January 02, 2009, 11:10:37 PM
John Silvetti and Louis Schaeffer were being ripped apart by RU long before anything was posted here at SM about either one. 


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #789 1/1/09 -
Post by: Anna on January 02, 2009, 11:11:21 PM
Quantico is a Marine Corp Base that houses among other things the FBI academy.

So were these agents onboard from the regular FBI which is in Washington, DC, or from Bardados?  There are some lab facilities at Quantico but the forensic samples in the plastic bags were only in the ALE dive boat was my understanding from Kyle's posts.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #789 1/1/09 -
Post by: ldstlou on January 02, 2009, 11:11:52 PM
I think we need Kermit, Jen, or wingnut to come back and re-state the timelines as they know it.

I think we need Tim Miller to explain it to us.
Tim Miller was not on the persistence when the ROV video was taken on jan 7...John S. put him off the ship on Dec 30th....

No but I am sure Tim could answer if the FBI were involved. I am sure he could answer what the protocol was in turning over footage. I am sure he could answer if he was removed from the Persistence. I am sure he could answer if he felt John Silvetti was involved in a cover-up with the FBI. I think those answers would go a long way right now.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #789 1/1/09 -
Post by: Blue Moon on January 02, 2009, 11:11:57 PM
If Kyle had his doubts about what the ALE were doing (pulling off a cover up) and the FBI was getting daily updates then why didn't Kyle go to the FBI instead of Freebirds with his concerns?


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #789 1/1/09 -
Post by: Keepthefaith on January 02, 2009, 11:13:30 PM
LDSTLOU,
Again, I think you have failed to follow EVERY detail and words of Kyle himself. Kyle has stated that John S. had NO interest in the trap -- in fact he told Kyle "to never bring up the trap" again! Kyle told Freebirds that John S. has NEW business dealings in Aruba. Beth's brother (private eye) was flabbergasted to find out about the Jan. 7th pics in MARCH! That is NOT IMMEDIATELY. Kyle had no responsibilty to turn over ALL pics????? Well, he sure had responsibility to SELL the pics in February!

John did not believe Natalee was in that trap. They had other targets they had located and he wanted to focus on the other targets that were possibilites. Remember, they identified quite a few other possible targets that they were eager to look into. It wasn't because he was hiding anything in the trap, he felt they had eliminated the possibility that it was Natalee and wanet to get to other possibilities.

How did he(Silvetti) come to that conclusion?

How did he eliminate Natalee as a possibilty when Kyle thought differently???

How did Silvetti come to the conclusion it wasn't Natalee?

Care to answer lisa??? ::MonkeyCool::

I have been bashed and had hostile questions thrown at me for over a month now...and you wonder why I am so sarcastic at this point..so no..I won't answer questions that are thrown at me with sarcasm.

I wouldn't answer that as well!You said it not me!How would Silvetti come to such a conclusion??

The person with the most expertise in coming to that conclusion was Tim Miller and what happened to him?He was asked to leave the ship per Kyle's word's.How can you come to such a conclusion without any experience to do so?I'm done... ::MonkeyDance::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #789 1/1/09 -
Post by: iris44 on January 02, 2009, 11:13:53 PM
LDSTLOU,
Again, I think you have failed to follow EVERY detail and words of Kyle himself. Kyle has stated that John S. had NO interest in the trap -- in fact he told Kyle "to never bring up the trap" again! Kyle told Freebirds that John S. has NEW business dealings in Aruba. Beth's brother (private eye) was flabbergasted to find out about the Jan. 7th pics in MARCH! That is NOT IMMEDIATELY. Kyle had no responsibilty to turn over ALL pics????? Well, he sure had responsibility to SELL the pics in February!

John did not believe Natalee was in that trap. They had other targets they had located and he wanted to focus on the other targets that were possibilites. Remember, they identified quite a few other possible targets that they were eager to look into. It wasn't because he was hiding anything in the trap, he felt they had eliminated the possibility that it was Natalee and wanet to get to other possibilities.

Eager to look into, so eager they begged for donations one day while they were packing to leave at the same time. 

I always thought they left abruptly because of the Chavez issues. 


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #789 1/1/09 -
Post by: wreck on January 02, 2009, 11:14:34 PM
If Kyle had his doubts about what the ALE were doing (pulling off a cover up) and the FBI was getting daily updates then why didn't Kyle go to the FBI instead of Freebirds with his concerns?
Bingo!


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #789 1/1/09 -
Post by: klaasend on January 02, 2009, 11:14:52 PM
If Kyle had his doubts about what the ALE were doing (pulling off a cover up) and the FBI was getting daily updates then why didn't Kyle go to the FBI instead of Freebirds with his concerns?

And that is my question


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #789 1/1/09 -
Post by: Keepthefaith on January 02, 2009, 11:14:55 PM
If Kyle had his doubts about what the ALE were doing (pulling off a cover up) and the FBI was getting daily updates then why didn't Kyle go to the FBI instead of Freebirds with his concerns?

Money,money,money..That's what i believe!JMOO


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #789 1/1/09 -
Post by: Anna on January 02, 2009, 11:16:20 PM
I think we need Kermit, Jen, or wingnut to come back and re-state the timelines as they know it.

I think we need Tim Miller to explain it to us.
Tim Miller was not on the persistence when the ROV video was taken on jan 7...John S. put him off the ship on Dec 30th....

No but I am sure Tim could answer if the FBI were involved. I am sure he could answer what the protocol was in turning over footage. I am sure he could answer if he was removed from the Persistence. I am sure he could answer if he felt John Silvetti was involved in a cover-up with the FBI. I think those answers would go a long way right now.


Tim Miller would have absolutely no way of knowing if "protocol" was followed or not.  And most especially in his complete absence from the Persistence.

Kyle was the one who raised the questions so I don't understand now why he is so upset.



Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #789 1/1/09 -
Post by: klaasend on January 02, 2009, 11:16:40 PM
LDSTLOU,
Again, I think you have failed to follow EVERY detail and words of Kyle himself. Kyle has stated that John S. had NO interest in the trap -- in fact he told Kyle "to never bring up the trap" again! Kyle told Freebirds that John S. has NEW business dealings in Aruba. Beth's brother (private eye) was flabbergasted to find out about the Jan. 7th pics in MARCH! That is NOT IMMEDIATELY. Kyle had no responsibilty to turn over ALL pics????? Well, he sure had responsibility to SELL the pics in February!

John did not believe Natalee was in that trap. They had other targets they had located and he wanted to focus on the other targets that were possibilites. Remember, they identified quite a few other possible targets that they were eager to look into. It wasn't because he was hiding anything in the trap, he felt they had eliminated the possibility that it was Natalee and wanet to get to other possibilities.

Eager to look into, so eager they begged for donations one day while they were packing to leave at the same time. 

I always thought they left abruptly because of the Chavez issues. 

Did everyone evacuate Aruba due to the Chavez issues?  Did tourists stop going?  Did tourists stop going on Snorkle trips, fishing trips, windsurfing, etc?.  Why would the Persistence leave because of some chest pounding by Chavez?


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #789 1/1/09 -
Post by: wreck on January 02, 2009, 11:16:52 PM
LDSTLOU,
Again, I think you have failed to follow EVERY detail and words of Kyle himself. Kyle has stated that John S. had NO interest in the trap -- in fact he told Kyle "to never bring up the trap" again! Kyle told Freebirds that John S. has NEW business dealings in Aruba. Beth's brother (private eye) was flabbergasted to find out about the Jan. 7th pics in MARCH! That is NOT IMMEDIATELY. Kyle had no responsibilty to turn over ALL pics????? Well, he sure had responsibility to SELL the pics in February!

John did not believe Natalee was in that trap. They had other targets they had located and he wanted to focus on the other targets that were possibilites. Remember, they identified quite a few other possible targets that they were eager to look into. It wasn't because he was hiding anything in the trap, he felt they had eliminated the possibility that it was Natalee and wanet to get to other possibilities.

Eager to look into, so eager they begged for donations one day while they were packing to leave at the same time. 

I always thought they left abruptly because of the Chavez issues. 
The very last thing the Persistence crew did was survey the pond at John S. instruction.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #789 1/1/09 -
Post by: Blue Moon on January 02, 2009, 11:16:55 PM
If Kyle had his doubts about what the ALE were doing (pulling off a cover up) and the FBI was getting daily updates then why didn't Kyle go to the FBI instead of Freebirds with his concerns?

And that is my question

Guess we will not get that answer. Seems they are gone again.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #789 1/1/09 -
Post by: ldstlou on January 02, 2009, 11:17:09 PM
I've said my peace. I have explained over and over why I am "defending Kyle"and the embers of the Persistence. I have had all my questions answered by Jug and Kyle and taken a hell of a lot of heat for sharing my opinions. Again, I think Tim Miller could answer a lot of these questions and his word would be trusted.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #789 1/1/09 -
Post by: 2NJSons_Mom on January 02, 2009, 11:17:10 PM
Quantico is a Marine Corp Base that houses among other things the FBI academy.

So were these agents onboard from the regular FBI which is in Washington, DC, or from Bardados?  There are some lab facilities at Quantico but the forensic samples in the plastic bags were only in the ALE dive boat was my understanding from Kyle's posts.

Just following along, here, Anna....my thoughts were along the same lines.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #789 1/1/09 -
Post by: ldstlou on January 02, 2009, 11:18:30 PM
If Kyle had his doubts about what the ALE were doing (pulling off a cover up) and the FBI was getting daily updates then why didn't Kyle go to the FBI instead of Freebirds with his concerns?

And that is my question

Guess we will not get that answer. Seems they are gone again.

I have not gone and I am not "they". Kyle did speak of his concerns to the FBI.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #789 1/1/09 -
Post by: wreck on January 02, 2009, 11:19:25 PM
I've said my peace. I have explained over and over why I am "defending Kyle"and the embers of the Persistence. I have had all my questions answered by Jug and Kyle and taken a hell of a lot of heat for sharing my opinions. Again, I think Tim Miller could answer a lot of these questions and his word would be trusted.
Tim was kicked off the boat Dec. 30th.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #789 1/1/09 -
Post by: Magnolia on January 02, 2009, 11:19:38 PM
Kyle is a liar.  We have seen that right here about little things.
The guy in the red shirt was not Silvetti.  He didn't know who
the diver was. etc.

He is just throwing things out there now to try to create some
doubt.

The thought that Americans who were suppose to be on a
mission to try to find Natalee's remains, betrayed her so totally
sickens me.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #789 1/1/09 -
Post by: ldstlou on January 02, 2009, 11:20:20 PM
LDSTLOU,
Again, I think you have failed to follow EVERY detail and words of Kyle himself. Kyle has stated that John S. had NO interest in the trap -- in fact he told Kyle "to never bring up the trap" again! Kyle told Freebirds that John S. has NEW business dealings in Aruba. Beth's brother (private eye) was flabbergasted to find out about the Jan. 7th pics in MARCH! That is NOT IMMEDIATELY. Kyle had no responsibilty to turn over ALL pics????? Well, he sure had responsibility to SELL the pics in February!

John did not believe Natalee was in that trap. They had other targets they had located and he wanted to focus on the other targets that were possibilites. Remember, they identified quite a few other possible targets that they were eager to look into. It wasn't because he was hiding anything in the trap, he felt they had eliminated the possibility that it was Natalee and wanet to get to other possibilities.

Eager to look into, so eager they begged for donations one day while they were packing to leave at the same time. 

I always thought they left abruptly because of the Chavez issues. 

that was my understanding too. Again, the best source to find out the answer would be Tim. I have said that for over a month now.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #789 1/1/09 -
Post by: Blue Moon on January 02, 2009, 11:20:53 PM
If Kyle had his doubts about what the ALE were doing (pulling off a cover up) and the FBI was getting daily updates then why didn't Kyle go to the FBI instead of Freebirds with his concerns?

And that is my question

Lou, I am sorry.  Maybe Kyle should be addressing these questions.  You are putting yourself in a very tough situation.  My prospective is I cannot understand why the FBI or the family were not given the pictures of the ROV retrieval from the Jan. 7th dive by ALE.

Guess we will not get that answer. Seems they are gone again.

I have not gone and I am not "they". Kyle did speak of his concerns to the FBI.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #789 1/1/09 -
Post by: billb's daughter on January 02, 2009, 11:20:55 PM
I am going to venture into this little thing here.  (gosh, I hope I don't regret it)

What I understand ldstlou to be saying here is that there was a protocol on the ship where things were turned over to the FBI as they were developed and Kyle was not the one on the ship that was assigned to do that.

Am I right, ldstlou?

that is my understanding

So what you are saying is that the FBI was there on the ship the entire time including January 7th and they saw the pictures.

So if they saw these pictures what is the big deal.

Is it because Kyle released information he should not have.

I am not sure what you are asking me? What is the big deal to me?
Surely you aren't trying to tell us the FBI was physically aboard the Persistence on Dec. 29th to Jan 7th?!?

Well, they wouldn't have to be onboard to receive the data.  It's quite easy to encrypt and transmit data.
This sure seems to be going in a circle and I'll be darned as to the reason why....
But, as stated, FBI didn't have to be onboard to receive the ROV videos, so why wasn't the ROV videos encrypted and transmitted the day they were made? I'm sure the FBI would not set up a protocol that only insisted screen captures were sent daily without covering or excluding videos....That wouldn't make any sense....
Kyle pretty much painted the picture that he knew the ROV video was not sent to FBI or family. He stated he was trying to strike a deal for financial gains....When Freebirds discovered that Kyle had not sent the ROV video in September 2008 they cut ties with him on advice of legal consul....Kermit exposed it along with help from Freebirds....
Pretty clear to me.....

From what I understood in the earlier posts, it was not Kyle's function to do that.  He had things he provided as assigned and the ROV images were assigned to someone else to provide.  My question earlier was, if it wasn't assigned to him to do, how would Kyle know if it was done or not?
Ok...maybe not kyle's function on jan 7th when the ROV Video was made.
At some point after that, Kyle was trying to sell the ROV Video for financial gains...he did not turn the ROV video over to proper authorities, although he must have had the video if he was trying to sell it. An ethical dilemma perhaps? Wasn't the stated purpose of the persistence  to find Natalee? They campaigned for funds from public and private donors...By not turning the potential evidence of remains that Kyle, in his own words believed he had, over to the proper authorities, at least worrisome? 
Maybe the only opportunity that Natalee's family ever had to gain Natalee's remains were thwarted by the action/inaction of those on the persistence. I find that immoral, unconscionable, and, at a minimum, obstruction of justice..for an American citizen, Natalee Holloway. Recovering Natalee's remains WERE the mission of the persistence!


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #789 1/1/09 -
Post by: hotping on January 02, 2009, 11:22:07 PM
Kyle is a liar.  We have seen that right here about little things.
The guy in the red shirt was not Silvetti.  He didn't know who
the diver was. etc.

He is just throwing things out there now to try to create some
doubt.

The thought that Americans who were suppose to be on a
mission to try to find Natalee's remains, betrayed her so totally
sickens me.
I agree! 


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #789 1/1/09 -
Post by: Keepthefaith on January 02, 2009, 11:22:13 PM
LDSTLOU,
Again, I think you have failed to follow EVERY detail and words of Kyle himself. Kyle has stated that John S. had NO interest in the trap -- in fact he told Kyle "to never bring up the trap" again! Kyle told Freebirds that John S. has NEW business dealings in Aruba. Beth's brother (private eye) was flabbergasted to find out about the Jan. 7th pics in MARCH! That is NOT IMMEDIATELY. Kyle had no responsibilty to turn over ALL pics????? Well, he sure had responsibility to SELL the pics in February!

John did not believe Natalee was in that trap. They had other targets they had located and he wanted to focus on the other targets that were possibilites. Remember, they identified quite a few other possible targets that they were eager to look into. It wasn't because he was hiding anything in the trap, he felt they had eliminated the possibility that it was Natalee and wanet to get to other possibilities.

Eager to look into, so eager they begged for donations one day while they were packing to leave at the same time. 

I always thought they left abruptly because of the Chavez issues. 

that was my understanding too. Again, the best source to find out the answer would be Tim. I have said that for over a month now.

How can you ask the guy about thing's that happened when he wasn't even there! ::MonkeyDance:: ::MonkeyDance::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #789 1/1/09 -
Post by: iris44 on January 02, 2009, 11:22:28 PM
I think we need Kermit, Jen, or wingnut to come back and re-state the timelines as they know it.

I think we need Tim Miller to explain it to us.
Tim Miller was not on the persistence when the ROV video was taken on jan 7...John S. put him off the ship on Dec 30th....

No but I am sure Tim could answer if the FBI were involved. I am sure he could answer what the protocol was in turning over footage. I am sure he could answer if he was removed from the Persistence. I am sure he could answer if he felt John Silvetti was involved in a cover-up with the FBI. I think those answers would go a long way right now.


Ldstlou, you have convinced me.  Your explanations sound straightforward and credible. 


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #789 1/1/09 -
Post by: ldstlou on January 02, 2009, 11:22:34 PM
I've said my peace. I have explained over and over why I am "defending Kyle"and the embers of the Persistence. I have had all my questions answered by Jug and Kyle and taken a hell of a lot of heat for sharing my opinions. Again, I think Tim Miller could answer a lot of these questions and his word would be trusted.
Tim was kicked off the boat Dec. 30th.

ok, in one breath posters call Kyle a liar...in another they take his word that Tim was kicked off. It is clear Kyle's views have changed throughout the endeaver, just as ours have changed over the past almost 4 years. Why not ask Tim Miller if he was kicked off?


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #789 1/1/09 -
Post by: Blue Moon on January 02, 2009, 11:22:34 PM
If Kyle had his doubts about what the ALE were doing (pulling off a cover up) and the FBI was getting daily updates then why didn't Kyle go to the FBI instead of Freebirds with his concerns?

And that is my question



I have not gone and I am not "they". Kyle did speak of his concerns to the FBI.

Lou, I am sorry.  Maybe Kyle should be addressing these questions.  You are putting yourself in a very tough situation.  My prospective is I cannot understand why the FBI or the family were not given the pictures of the ROV retrieval from the Jan. 7th dive by ALE.

Guess we will not get that answer. Seems they are gone again.

(correction on my last post)


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #789 1/1/09 -
Post by: Keepthefaith on January 02, 2009, 11:23:33 PM
I am going to venture into this little thing here.  (gosh, I hope I don't regret it)

What I understand ldstlou to be saying here is that there was a protocol on the ship where things were turned over to the FBI as they were developed and Kyle was not the one on the ship that was assigned to do that.

Am I right, ldstlou?

that is my understanding

So what you are saying is that the FBI was there on the ship the entire time including January 7th and they saw the pictures.

So if they saw these pictures what is the big deal.

Is it because Kyle released information he should not have.

I am not sure what you are asking me? What is the big deal to me?
Surely you aren't trying to tell us the FBI was physically aboard the Persistence on Dec. 29th to Jan 7th?!?

Well, they wouldn't have to be onboard to receive the data.  It's quite easy to encrypt and transmit data.
This sure seems to be going in a circle and I'll be darned as to the reason why....
But, as stated, FBI didn't have to be onboard to receive the ROV videos, so why wasn't the ROV videos encrypted and transmitted the day they were made? I'm sure the FBI would not set up a protocol that only insisted screen captures were sent daily without covering or excluding videos....That wouldn't make any sense....
Kyle pretty much painted the picture that he knew the ROV video was not sent to FBI or family. He stated he was trying to strike a deal for financial gains....When Freebirds discovered that Kyle had not sent the ROV video in September 2008 they cut ties with him on advice of legal consul....Kermit exposed it along with help from Freebirds....
Pretty clear to me.....

From what I understood in the earlier posts, it was not Kyle's function to do that.  He had things he provided as assigned and the ROV images were assigned to someone else to provide.  My question earlier was, if it wasn't assigned to him to do, how would Kyle know if it was done or not?
Ok...maybe not kyle's function on jan 7th when the ROV Video was made.
At some point after that, Kyle was trying to sell the ROV Video for financial gains...he did not turn the ROV video over to proper authorities, although he must have had the video if he was trying to sell it. An ethical dilemma perhaps? Wasn't the stated purpose of the persistence  to find Natalee? They campaigned for funds from public and private donors...By not turning the potential evidence of remains that Kyle, in his own words believed he had, over to the proper authorities, at least worrisome? 
Maybe the only opportunity that Natalee's family ever had to gain Natalee's remains were thwarted by the action/inaction of those on the persistence. I find that immoral, unconscionable, and, at a minimum, obstruction of justice..for an American citizen, Natalee Holloway. Recovering Natalee's remains WERE the mission of the persistence!


 ::MonkeyDance:: ::cartwheel:: ::MonkeyDance::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #789 1/1/09 -
Post by: Anna on January 02, 2009, 11:23:40 PM
Is Tim Miller's ulcer still bleeding?  I don't think that he should even be asked to vouch for things happening when he was not even aboard.  He would have absolutely no way of knowing who sent what to whom.



Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #789 1/1/09 -
Post by: Keepthefaith on January 02, 2009, 11:24:59 PM
Is Tim Miller's ulcer still bleeding?  I don't think that he should even be asked to vouch for things happening when he was not even aboard.  He would have absolutely no way of knowing who sent what to whom.



 ::MonkeyWink::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #789 1/1/09 -
Post by: ldstlou on January 02, 2009, 11:25:06 PM
LDSTLOU,
Again, I think you have failed to follow EVERY detail and words of Kyle himself. Kyle has stated that John S. had NO interest in the trap -- in fact he told Kyle "to never bring up the trap" again! Kyle told Freebirds that John S. has NEW business dealings in Aruba. Beth's brother (private eye) was flabbergasted to find out about the Jan. 7th pics in MARCH! That is NOT IMMEDIATELY. Kyle had no responsibilty to turn over ALL pics????? Well, he sure had responsibility to SELL the pics in February!

John did not believe Natalee was in that trap. They had other targets they had located and he wanted to focus on the other targets that were possibilites. Remember, they identified quite a few other possible targets that they were eager to look into. It wasn't because he was hiding anything in the trap, he felt they had eliminated the possibility that it was Natalee and wanet to get to other possibilities.

Eager to look into, so eager they begged for donations one day while they were packing to leave at the same time. 

I always thought they left abruptly because of the Chavez issues. 

that was my understanding too. Again, the best source to find out the answer would be Tim. I have said that for over a month now.

How can you ask the guy about thing's that happened when he wasn't even there! ::MonkeyDance:: ::MonkeyDance::

I think Tim could answer whether he was "removed" from the Persistence or not.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #789 1/1/09 -
Post by: Keepthefaith on January 02, 2009, 11:26:01 PM
I stand with the Frog,Jen,Wingnut,as well as Angie... ::MonkeyCool::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #789 1/1/09 -
Post by: klaasend on January 02, 2009, 11:26:13 PM
http://www.nd.nl/artikelen/2009/januari/02/pvv-er-brinkman-uit-zijn-kritiek-op-zaak-holloway

Brinkman PVV'er from his criticism of Holloway case Published: 03 January 2009 05:00, last updated: 02 January 2009 21:43

by Dick Hofland

PVV-MP Hero Brinkman. | Nederlands Dagblad photo / Jaco Klamer
-------------------------------------------------- ------------------------------
THE HAGUE - The Holloway case in terms of PVV MP Hero Brinkman-to carelessly examined. During the visit of a delegation he dives in the case, but he also criticized the new management structure in the Antilles.



MP Hero Brinkman of the PVV appears next week in Aruba in the Natalee Holloway case. During the visit of a parliamentary delegation to the West, he speaks in the Advocate of the missing American teenager, several policemen and some former members of the Public Ministry. ,, The research is so fucked up.''

What can you do what Peter R. de Vries can not?
,, I wish that the case was a cover it. Because that likely to happen now. Peter R. de Vries has updated me about everything and I've read about the case, so I am well prepared. And I agreed that I tell him everything I know to do.''

What do you discover?
,, The Aruban Justice Minister Rudy Croes has been corrupt, but in this case I think he speaks the truth. Croes has suggested that the father of Joran van der Sloot in Aruba and the police were very good friends. That police chief said that he would have the son of his best friend could not continue. That explains why the investigation only after ten days was set in motion, while four hours after the disappearance of Natalee Joran already clear that there was closely involved.,,

You are also plans for the new governance structure of the West on such matters. Are not you afraid that you Antilles hence the cabinet hunts.
,, I say what I think and I see what happens. I'm starting Monday at the table with various people I have accused of corruption. I do not know how they will approach me, but I'm still welcome.''

What are you going to blame the West?
,, There is an agreement that the Netherlands seventy percent of the debt charity, and that control over administration and justice. That seems good, but what does the island of Curacao was the first council done? The private pension supplemented with 1.3 million euros. This is an geneerde form of self-enrichment which the dog does not eat bread.''

,, I foresee that in the West as quickly as possible the money would have to be as fast as possible to them. The negotiations on the constitutional changes are, unfortunately, wrong place. We ought to agree that they may make no new debt.''


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #789 1/1/09 -
Post by: Anna on January 02, 2009, 11:27:21 PM
Kyle is the one who said not only was Tim Miller removed but that he had become considered a "liability" was the word Kyle used.

He is the one who said that, not SM.



Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #789 1/1/09 -
Post by: ldstlou on January 02, 2009, 11:28:26 PM
If Kyle had his doubts about what the ALE were doing (pulling off a cover up) and the FBI was getting daily updates then why didn't Kyle go to the FBI instead of Freebirds with his concerns?

And that is my question



I have not gone and I am not "they". Kyle did speak of his concerns to the FBI.

Lou, I am sorry.  Maybe Kyle should be addressing these questions.  You are putting yourself in a very tough situation.  My prospective is I cannot understand why the FBI or the family were not given the pictures of the ROV retrieval from the Jan. 7th dive by ALE.

Guess we will not get that answer. Seems they are gone again.

(correction on my last post)

And it is my belief they were.
Kyle is called a liar by many posters here...so why bother having him here?
I never attempted to speak for Kyle, I have attempted to say why I don't believe members of the Persistence were involved in a cover-up. 


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #789 1/1/09 -
Post by: Keepthefaith on January 02, 2009, 11:28:39 PM
http://www.nd.nl/artikelen/2009/januari/02/pvv-er-brinkman-uit-zijn-kritiek-op-zaak-holloway

Brinkman PVV'er from his criticism of Holloway case Published: 03 January 2009 05:00, last updated: 02 January 2009 21:43

by Dick Hofland

PVV-MP Hero Brinkman. | Nederlands Dagblad photo / Jaco Klamer
-------------------------------------------------- ------------------------------
THE HAGUE - The Holloway case in terms of PVV MP Hero Brinkman-to carelessly examined. During the visit of a delegation he dives in the case, but he also criticized the new management structure in the Antilles.



MP Hero Brinkman of the PVV appears next week in Aruba in the Natalee Holloway case. During the visit of a parliamentary delegation to the West, he speaks in the Advocate of the missing American teenager, several policemen and some former members of the Public Ministry. ,, The research is so fucked up.''

What can you do what Peter R. de Vries can not?
,, I wish that the case was a cover it. Because that likely to happen now. Peter R. de Vries has updated me about everything and I've read about the case, so I am well prepared. And I agreed that I tell him everything I know to do.''

What do you discover?
,, The Aruban Justice Minister Rudy Croes has been corrupt, but in this case I think he speaks the truth. Croes has suggested that the father of Joran van der Sloot in Aruba and the police were very good friends. That police chief said that he would have the son of his best friend could not continue. That explains why the investigation only after ten days was set in motion, while four hours after the disappearance of Natalee Joran already clear that there was closely involved.,,

You are also plans for the new governance structure of the West on such matters. Are not you afraid that you Antilles hence the cabinet hunts.
,, I say what I think and I see what happens. I'm starting Monday at the table with various people I have accused of corruption. I do not know how they will approach me, but I'm still welcome.''

What are you going to blame the West?
,, There is an agreement that the Netherlands seventy percent of the debt charity, and that control over administration and justice. That seems good, but what does the island of Curacao was the first council done? The private pension supplemented with 1.3 million euros. This is an geneerde form of self-enrichment which the dog does not eat bread.''

,, I foresee that in the West as quickly as possible the money would have to be as fast as possible to them. The negotiations on the constitutional changes are, unfortunately, wrong place. We ought to agree that they may make no new debt.''

Thanx Klaas!


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #789 1/1/09 -
Post by: Tamikosmom on January 02, 2009, 11:30:22 PM
LDSTLOU,
Again, I think you have failed to follow EVERY detail and words of Kyle himself. Kyle has stated that John S. had NO interest in the trap -- in fact he told Kyle "to never bring up the trap" again! Kyle told Freebirds that John S. has NEW business dealings in Aruba. Beth's brother (private eye) was flabbergasted to find out about the Jan. 7th pics in MARCH! That is NOT IMMEDIATELY. Kyle had no responsibilty to turn over ALL pics????? Well, he sure had responsibility to SELL the pics in February!

John did not believe Natalee was in that trap. They had other targets they had located and he wanted to focus on the other targets that were possibilites. Remember, they identified quite a few other possible targets that they were eager to look into. It wasn't because he was hiding anything in the trap, he felt they had eliminated the possibility that it was Natalee and wanet to get to other possibilities.

Eager to look into, so eager they begged for donations one day while they were packing to leave at the same time. 

I always thought they left abruptly because of the Chavez issues. 

that was my understanding too. Again, the best source to find out the answer would be Tim. I have said that for over a month now.

How can you ask the guy about thing's that happened when he wasn't even there! ::MonkeyDance:: ::MonkeyDance::

Exactly!!!

Kyle Kings posts which were submitted to the Natalee's Freebird forum tells the story of the Persistence coverup and ... answers all the questions.  Kyle was on board the Persistence ... he should know.

Janet
_____

Tamikosmom
Re: Natalee Case Discussion #789 1/1/09 -
« Reply #374 on: January 02, 2009, 09:23:30 PM »

KYLE KINGMAN - PRIVATE FORUM


http://scaredmonkeys.net/index.php?topic=4340.msg609289;topicseen#msg609289


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #789 1/1/09 -
Post by: ldstlou on January 02, 2009, 11:30:26 PM
I have to put my son to bed.
Good night all.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #789 1/1/09 -
Post by: truthseeker2 on January 02, 2009, 11:33:17 PM
http://www.nd.nl/artikelen/2009/januari/02/pvv-er-brinkman-uit-zijn-kritiek-op-zaak-holloway

Brinkman PVV'er from his criticism of Holloway case Published: 03 January 2009 05:00, last updated: 02 January 2009 21:43

by Dick Hofland

PVV-MP Hero Brinkman. | Nederlands Dagblad photo / Jaco Klamer
-------------------------------------------------- ------------------------------
THE HAGUE - The Holloway case in terms of PVV MP Hero Brinkman-to carelessly examined. During the visit of a delegation he dives in the case, but he also criticized the new management structure in the Antilles.



MP Hero Brinkman of the PVV appears next week in Aruba in the Natalee Holloway case. During the visit of a parliamentary delegation to the West, he speaks in the Advocate of the missing American teenager, several policemen and some former members of the Public Ministry. ,, The research is so fucked up.''

What can you do what Peter R. de Vries can not?
,, I wish that the case was a cover it. Because that likely to happen now. Peter R. de Vries has updated me about everything and I've read about the case, so I am well prepared. And I agreed that I tell him everything I know to do.''

What do you discover?
,, The Aruban Justice Minister Rudy Croes has been corrupt, but in this case I think he speaks the truth. Croes has suggested that the father of Joran van der Sloot in Aruba and the police were very good friends. That police chief said that he would have the son of his best friend could not continue. That explains why the investigation only after ten days was set in motion, while four hours after the disappearance of Natalee Joran already clear that there was closely involved.,,

You are also plans for the new governance structure of the West on such matters. Are not you afraid that you Antilles hence the cabinet hunts.
,, I say what I think and I see what happens. I'm starting Monday at the table with various people I have accused of corruption. I do not know how they will approach me, but I'm still welcome.''

What are you going to blame the West?
,, There is an agreement that the Netherlands seventy percent of the debt charity, and that control over administration and justice. That seems good, but what does the island of Curacao was the first council done? The private pension supplemented with 1.3 million euros. This is an geneerde form of self-enrichment which the dog does not eat bread.''

,, I foresee that in the West as quickly as possible the money would have to be as fast as possible to them. The negotiations on the constitutional changes are, unfortunately, wrong place. We ought to agree that they may make no new debt.''

I wonder if what I have bolded is translated properly?  Within 4 hours?  Could he be talking about the 4:00 am pickup of Joran by Paulus? Or, 4 hours after she was reported missing by the chaperone?


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #789 1/1/09 -
Post by: Anna on January 02, 2009, 11:33:50 PM
I can understand how someone can have a change of opinion or perception of things as more information is obtained.  What I can't understand is how facts can change.  First stating unequivocally that the FBI was NOT informed and now not only were they informed but on board?

Doesn't make sense.  Opinions and speculations change.  Facts don't.

JMO



Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #789 1/1/09 -
Post by: billb's daughter on January 02, 2009, 11:35:24 PM
LDSTLOU,
Again, I think you have failed to follow EVERY detail and words of Kyle himself. Kyle has stated that John S. had NO interest in the trap -- in fact he told Kyle "to never bring up the trap" again! Kyle told Freebirds that John S. has NEW business dealings in Aruba. Beth's brother (private eye) was flabbergasted to find out about the Jan. 7th pics in MARCH! That is NOT IMMEDIATELY. Kyle had no responsibilty to turn over ALL pics????? Well, he sure had responsibility to SELL the pics in February!

John did not believe Natalee was in that trap. They had other targets they had located and he wanted to focus on the other targets that were possibilites. Remember, they identified quite a few other possible targets that they were eager to look into. It wasn't because he was hiding anything in the trap, he felt they had eliminated the possibility that it was Natalee and wanet to get to other possibilities.

Eager to look into, so eager they begged for donations one day while they were packing to leave at the same time. 

I always thought they left abruptly because of the Chavez issues. 

that was my understanding too. Again, the best source to find out the answer would be Tim. I have said that for over a month now.

How can you ask the guy about thing's that happened when he wasn't even there! ::MonkeyDance:: ::MonkeyDance::

I think Tim could answer whether he was "removed" from the Persistence or not.
WTH does it matter if Tim was removed or left for whatever reason on Dec 30th? We are talking about the ROV video (Jan 7th)  and how it was handled by the persistence crew....including kyle who brought his concerns out in the open on a forum. The members of that forum became concerned because kyle had not turned over the ROV video as late as Sept 2008.....members of that forum did turn over at least the evidence kyle had provided to FBI and Beth, JQK....
idstlou.....you seem to always take something to nitpick rather than focusing on the main point.....mhoo.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #789 1/1/09 -
Post by: Keepthefaith on January 02, 2009, 11:36:13 PM
LDSTLOU,
Again, I think you have failed to follow EVERY detail and words of Kyle himself. Kyle has stated that John S. had NO interest in the trap -- in fact he told Kyle "to never bring up the trap" again! Kyle told Freebirds that John S. has NEW business dealings in Aruba. Beth's brother (private eye) was flabbergasted to find out about the Jan. 7th pics in MARCH! That is NOT IMMEDIATELY. Kyle had no responsibilty to turn over ALL pics????? Well, he sure had responsibility to SELL the pics in February!

John did not believe Natalee was in that trap. They had other targets they had located and he wanted to focus on the other targets that were possibilites. Remember, they identified quite a few other possible targets that they were eager to look into. It wasn't because he was hiding anything in the trap, he felt they had eliminated the possibility that it was Natalee and wanet to get to other possibilities.

Janet..
This comment is what i find interesting.How could or did John Silvetti come to this conclusion and how would Ldstlou know this??Just a question...


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #789 1/1/09 -
Post by: Tamikosmom on January 02, 2009, 11:36:46 PM
If Kyle had his doubts about what the ALE were doing (pulling off a cover up) and the FBI was getting daily updates then why didn't Kyle go to the FBI instead of Freebirds with his concerns?

And that is my question



I have not gone and I am not "they". Kyle did speak of his concerns to the FBI.

Lou, I am sorry.  Maybe Kyle should be addressing these questions.  You are putting yourself in a very tough situation.  My prospective is I cannot understand why the FBI or the family were not given the pictures of the ROV retrieval from the Jan. 7th dive by ALE.

Guess we will not get that answer. Seems they are gone again.

(correction on my last post)

And it is my belief they were.
Kyle is called a liar by many posters here...so why bother having him here?
I never attempted to speak for Kyle, I have attempted to say why I don't believe members of the Persistence were involved in a cover-up. 

I am a believer in Kyle Kingman's own words 100%.  This is the reason I am so angry.

Janet


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #789 1/1/09 -
Post by: Anna on January 02, 2009, 11:38:06 PM
Quantico is a Marine Corp Base that houses among other things the FBI academy.

So were these agents onboard from the regular FBI which is in Washington, DC, or from Bardados?  There are some lab facilities at Quantico but the forensic samples in the plastic bags were only in the ALE dive boat was my understanding from Kyle's posts.

Just following along, here, Anna....my thoughts were along the same lines.

Someone from Quantico could be a Marine, lol. 


Marine Corps Base Quantico
It's called the "Crossroads of the Marine Corps," and during its 80 year tenure on the approximately 100 square miles of land located along the western bank of the Potomac River, Marine Corps Base Quantico has been a training site for Marines and a birthing place of Marine Corps concepts.

The Marine Corps Base provides functional support for the overall Quantico mission including the provision of personnel administration, facilities, logistics, financial security, safety, public information, legal, base operations, training, administration, morale, welfare and recreation support for organic and tenant organizations.



Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #789 1/1/09 -
Post by: iris44 on January 02, 2009, 11:39:18 PM
LDSTLOU,
Again, I think you have failed to follow EVERY detail and words of Kyle himself. Kyle has stated that John S. had NO interest in the trap -- in fact he told Kyle "to never bring up the trap" again! Kyle told Freebirds that John S. has NEW business dealings in Aruba. Beth's brother (private eye) was flabbergasted to find out about the Jan. 7th pics in MARCH! That is NOT IMMEDIATELY. Kyle had no responsibilty to turn over ALL pics????? Well, he sure had responsibility to SELL the pics in February!

John did not believe Natalee was in that trap. They had other targets they had located and he wanted to focus on the other targets that were possibilites. Remember, they identified quite a few other possible targets that they were eager to look into. It wasn't because he was hiding anything in the trap, he felt they had eliminated the possibility that it was Natalee and wanet to get to other possibilities.

Eager to look into, so eager they begged for donations one day while they were packing to leave at the same time. 

I always thought they left abruptly because of the Chavez issues. 

Did everyone evacuate Aruba due to the Chavez issues?  Did tourists stop going?  Did tourists stop going on Snorkle trips, fishing trips, windsurfing, etc?.  Why would the Persistence leave because of some chest pounding by Chavez?

Things were pretty tense in that area at that exact time as I recall.  There was a lot of news coverage and it seemed serious at the time.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #789 1/1/09 -
Post by: hotping on January 02, 2009, 11:39:22 PM
If Kyle had his doubts about what the ALE were doing (pulling off a cover up) and the FBI was getting daily updates then why didn't Kyle go to the FBI instead of Freebirds with his concerns?

And that is my question



I have not gone and I am not "they". Kyle did speak of his concerns to the FBI.

Lou, I am sorry.  Maybe Kyle should be addressing these questions.  You are putting yourself in a very tough situation.  My prospective is I cannot understand why the FBI or the family were not given the pictures of the ROV retrieval from the Jan. 7th dive by ALE.

Guess we will not get that answer. Seems they are gone again.

(correction on my last post)

And it is my belief they were.
Kyle is called a liar by many posters here...so why bother having him here?
I never attempted to speak for Kyle, I have attempted to say why I don't believe members of the Persistence were involved in a cover-up. 

I am a believer in Kyle Kingman's own words 100%.  This is the reason I am so angry.

Janet
Ditto!


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #789 1/1/09 -
Post by: texasmom on January 02, 2009, 11:41:49 PM
I believe this is the woman that I posted about that died on the diving trip.  There are also many very nice comments that follow the article.

http://www.windsorstar.com/Budimir+Hussey+death+loss+community/1124483/story.html


(http://a123.g.akamai.net/f/123/12465/1d/www.windsorstar.com/budimir+hussey+death+loss+community/1124483/1124484.bin)

Helen Budimir-Hussey, pictured in this 2006 file photo, is being remembered for her tireless volunteer work and giving spirit after she died on Christmas Eve while scuba diving in the Caribbean.Photograph by: Scott Webster, The Windsor Star

A LaSalle woman is being remembered for her tireless volunteer work and giving spirit after she died on Christmas Eve while scuba diving in the Caribbean.

Helen Budimir-Hussey, 54, died after having trouble in the water off the island of Aruba.

“It was an accidental death,” said Roger Mann, a friend of the family.

Details of the cause of Budimir-Hussey’s death remain unclear. Mann said he heard Budimir-Hussey experienced breathing difficulties. “Unfortunately, they couldn’t revive her,” Mann said. “That’s all we know at this point.”

Mann said Budimir-Hussey and her family vacation in Aruba every year.

A mother of three, Budimir-Hussey was known for her extensive involvement in such community organizations as the Canadian Cancer Society, the Rotary Club of LaSalle-Centennial and the Serbian Heritage Museum and Library.

Mann, a fellow Rotary Club member, said Budimir-Hussey was a founding member of the club and her devotion to charitable causes was second to none.

“There’s something unique about Helen. She was the true definition of giving,” Mann said. “It’s a terrible loss. Not only for her family, but the community at large.”

For example, Mann said Budimir-Hussey was the lead organizer of the town’s annual Santa Claus parade, including this year’s event. “We used to call that Helen’s parade. She did it.”

Carol Cyphery, of the Essex County unit of the Canadian Cancer Society, said Budimir-Hussey was involved in the CCS for more than 30 years, previously serving as the unit’s manager and more recently as president of the unit’s volunteer council.

Cyphery said Budimir-Hussey lived the mission of the CCS in believing that a cure for cancer can be found. “She always felt that research was the key. She did a lot of work fundraising, trying to raise dollars and public awareness for the need for research to find a cure for cancer. That was her biggest passion, I would say.”

The cause hit close to home for Budimir-Hussey in 2006, when her eldest son Jordan died of a rare form of cancer at the age of 21.

Another group important to Budimir-Hussey was the Serbian Women’s Club of Windsor. Budimir-Hussey’s father was Yugoslavian-born Steve Budimir, owner of Windsor’s N&D grocery stores.

Club president Alexandra Budisavljevic said Budimir-Hussey was a faithful and ambitious member. “If you ever needed anything done, you called Helen,” Budisavljevic said.

Roger Mann described Budimir-Hussey as a driving force. “She juggled all these things. At the same time, she looked after her family very well. She always had this passion … the passion for giving. That’s what defined her, really.”

Budimir-Hussey is survived by her husband Terry, her university-age son MacKenzie and her youngest son Dylan, who’s still in elementary school.

Arrangements have been made with Families First Funeral Home, 3260 Dougall Ave. Visitation takes place from 2 to 5 p.m. Thursday, and 2 to 5 p.m. and 7 to 9 p.m. Friday. A service will take place at the funeral home 11:30 a.m. Saturday.

Budimir-Hussey’s family asks that any donations be given to the Canadian Cancer Society, as per Helen’s wishes.






Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #789 1/1/09 -
Post by: billb's daughter on January 02, 2009, 11:41:50 PM
If Kyle had his doubts about what the ALE were doing (pulling off a cover up) and the FBI was getting daily updates then why didn't Kyle go to the FBI instead of Freebirds with his concerns?

And that is my question



I have not gone and I am not "they". Kyle did speak of his concerns to the FBI.

Lou, I am sorry.  Maybe Kyle should be addressing these questions.  You are putting yourself in a very tough situation.  My prospective is I cannot understand why the FBI or the family were not given the pictures of the ROV retrieval from the Jan. 7th dive by ALE.

Guess we will not get that answer. Seems they are gone again.

(correction on my last post)

And it is my belief they were.
Kyle is called a liar by many posters here...so why bother having him here?
I never attempted to speak for Kyle, I have attempted to say why I don't believe members of the Persistence were involved in a cover-up. 

I am a believer in Kyle Kingman's own words 100%.  This is the reason I am so angry.

Janet
Ditto!
Double Ditto.. ::MonkeyCool::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #789 1/1/09 -
Post by: truthseeker2 on January 02, 2009, 11:42:10 PM

I always thought they left abruptly because of the Chavez issues. 

Did everyone evacuate Aruba due to the Chavez issues?  Did tourists stop going?  Did tourists stop going on Snorkle trips, fishing trips, windsurfing, etc?.  Why would the Persistence leave because of some chest pounding by Chavez?

Things were pretty tense in that area at that exact time as I recall.  There was a lot of news coverage and it seemed serious at the time.
[/quote]

I think so too, iris.  Tourists have to make their own decisions about things like that.  The Persistence was out there with a lot of valuable equipment and employees.  I can understand a decision where it's better to be safe than sorry.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #789 1/1/09 -
Post by: MuffyBee on January 02, 2009, 11:42:40 PM
If Kyle had his doubts about what the ALE were doing (pulling off a cover up) and the FBI was getting daily updates then why didn't Kyle go to the FBI instead of Freebirds with his concerns?

And that is my question



I have not gone and I am not "they". Kyle did speak of his concerns to the FBI.

Lou, I am sorry.  Maybe Kyle should be addressing these questions.  You are putting yourself in a very tough situation.  My prospective is I cannot understand why the FBI or the family were not given the pictures of the ROV retrieval from the Jan. 7th dive by ALE.

Guess we will not get that answer. Seems they are gone again.

(correction on my last post)

And it is my belief they were.
Kyle is called a liar by many posters here...so why bother having him here?
I never attempted to speak for Kyle, I have attempted to say why I don't believe members of the Persistence were involved in a cover-up. 

 :scratch:


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #789 1/1/09 -
Post by: wreck on January 02, 2009, 11:43:55 PM
Quantico is a Marine Corp Base that houses among other things the FBI academy.

So were these agents onboard from the regular FBI which is in Washington, DC, or from Bardados?  There are some lab facilities at Quantico but the forensic samples in the plastic bags were only in the ALE dive boat was my understanding from Kyle's posts.

Just following along, here, Anna....my thoughts were along the same lines.

Someone from Quantico could be a Marine, lol. 


Marine Corps Base Quantico
It's called the "Crossroads of the Marine Corps," and during its 80 year tenure on the approximately 100 square miles of land located along the western bank of the Potomac River, Marine Corps Base Quantico has been a training site for Marines and a birthing place of Marine Corps concepts.

The Marine Corps Base provides functional support for the overall Quantico mission including the provision of personnel administration, facilities, logistics, financial security, safety, public information, legal, base operations, training, administration, morale, welfare and recreation support for organic and tenant organizations.


Didn't Dompig train at Quantico?? Maybe HE was on board the Persistence!


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #789 1/1/09 -
Post by: iris44 on January 02, 2009, 11:44:50 PM
http://www.nd.nl/artikelen/2009/januari/02/pvv-er-brinkman-uit-zijn-kritiek-op-zaak-holloway

Brinkman PVV'er from his criticism of Holloway case Published: 03 January 2009 05:00, last updated: 02 January 2009 21:43

by Dick Hofland

PVV-MP Hero Brinkman. | Nederlands Dagblad photo / Jaco Klamer
-------------------------------------------------- ------------------------------
THE HAGUE - The Holloway case in terms of PVV MP Hero Brinkman-to carelessly examined. During the visit of a delegation he dives in the case, but he also criticized the new management structure in the Antilles.



MP Hero Brinkman of the PVV appears next week in Aruba in the Natalee Holloway case. During the visit of a parliamentary delegation to the West, he speaks in the Advocate of the missing American teenager, several policemen and some former members of the Public Ministry. ,, The research is so fucked up.''

What can you do what Peter R. de Vries can not?
,, I wish that the case was a cover it. Because that likely to happen now. Peter R. de Vries has updated me about everything and I've read about the case, so I am well prepared. And I agreed that I tell him everything I know to do.''

What do you discover?
,, The Aruban Justice Minister Rudy Croes has been corrupt, but in this case I think he speaks the truth. Croes has suggested that the father of Joran van der Sloot in Aruba and the police were very good friends. That police chief said that he would have the son of his best friend could not continue. That explains why the investigation only after ten days was set in motion, while four hours after the disappearance of Natalee Joran already clear that there was closely involved.,,

You are also plans for the new governance structure of the West on such matters. Are not you afraid that you Antilles hence the cabinet hunts.
,, I say what I think and I see what happens. I'm starting Monday at the table with various people I have accused of corruption. I do not know how they will approach me, but I'm still welcome.''

What are you going to blame the West?
,, There is an agreement that the Netherlands seventy percent of the debt charity, and that control over administration and justice. That seems good, but what does the island of Curacao was the first council done? The private pension supplemented with 1.3 million euros. This is an geneerde form of self-enrichment which the dog does not eat bread.''

,, I foresee that in the West as quickly as possible the money would have to be as fast as possible to them. The negotiations on the constitutional changes are, unfortunately, wrong place. We ought to agree that they may make no new debt.''

I wonder if what I have bolded is translated properly?  Within 4 hours?  Could he be talking about the 4:00 am pickup of Joran by Paulus? Or, 4 hours after she was reported missing by the chaperone?

Wasn't Joran supposedly telling other students at school that Natalee drowned?  If she died at 3 or 4 a.m., Joran was at school by 8 am or so; that would be around 4 hours.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #789 1/1/09 -
Post by: 2NJSons_Mom on January 02, 2009, 11:45:53 PM
I believe this is the woman that I posted about that died on the diving trip.  There are also many very nice comments that follow the article.

http://www.windsorstar.com/Budimir+Hussey+death+loss+community/1124483/story.html


(http://a123.g.akamai.net/f/123/12465/1d/www.windsorstar.com/budimir+hussey+death+loss+community/1124483/1124484.bin)

Helen Budimir-Hussey, pictured in this 2006 file photo, is being remembered for her tireless volunteer work and giving spirit after she died on Christmas Eve while scuba diving in the Caribbean.Photograph by: Scott Webster, The Windsor Star

A LaSalle woman is being remembered for her tireless volunteer work and giving spirit after she died on Christmas Eve while scuba diving in the Caribbean.

Helen Budimir-Hussey, 54, died after having trouble in the water off the island of Aruba.

“It was an accidental death,” said Roger Mann, a friend of the family.

Details of the cause of Budimir-Hussey’s death remain unclear. Mann said he heard Budimir-Hussey experienced breathing difficulties. “Unfortunately, they couldn’t revive her,” Mann said. “That’s all we know at this point.”

Mann said Budimir-Hussey and her family vacation in Aruba every year.

A mother of three, Budimir-Hussey was known for her extensive involvement in such community organizations as the Canadian Cancer Society, the Rotary Club of LaSalle-Centennial and the Serbian Heritage Museum and Library.

Mann, a fellow Rotary Club member, said Budimir-Hussey was a founding member of the club and her devotion to charitable causes was second to none.

“There’s something unique about Helen. She was the true definition of giving,” Mann said. “It’s a terrible loss. Not only for her family, but the community at large.”

For example, Mann said Budimir-Hussey was the lead organizer of the town’s annual Santa Claus parade, including this year’s event. “We used to call that Helen’s parade. She did it.”

Carol Cyphery, of the Essex County unit of the Canadian Cancer Society, said Budimir-Hussey was involved in the CCS for more than 30 years, previously serving as the unit’s manager and more recently as president of the unit’s volunteer council.

Cyphery said Budimir-Hussey lived the mission of the CCS in believing that a cure for cancer can be found. “She always felt that research was the key. She did a lot of work fundraising, trying to raise dollars and public awareness for the need for research to find a cure for cancer. That was her biggest passion, I would say.”

The cause hit close to home for Budimir-Hussey in 2006, when her eldest son Jordan died of a rare form of cancer at the age of 21.

Another group important to Budimir-Hussey was the Serbian Women’s Club of Windsor. Budimir-Hussey’s father was Yugoslavian-born Steve Budimir, owner of Windsor’s N&D grocery stores.

Club president Alexandra Budisavljevic said Budimir-Hussey was a faithful and ambitious member. “If you ever needed anything done, you called Helen,” Budisavljevic said.

Roger Mann described Budimir-Hussey as a driving force. “She juggled all these things. At the same time, she looked after her family very well. She always had this passion … the passion for giving. That’s what defined her, really.”

Budimir-Hussey is survived by her husband Terry, her university-age son MacKenzie and her youngest son Dylan, who’s still in elementary school.

Arrangements have been made with Families First Funeral Home, 3260 Dougall Ave. Visitation takes place from 2 to 5 p.m. Thursday, and 2 to 5 p.m. and 7 to 9 p.m. Friday. A service will take place at the funeral home 11:30 a.m. Saturday.

Budimir-Hussey’s family asks that any donations be given to the Canadian Cancer Society, as per Helen’s wishes.






Lovely photo of a lovely, giving woman....I'm just sorry I will remember the photo of her in the initial news article.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #789 1/1/09 -
Post by: wreck on January 02, 2009, 11:47:35 PM
I believe this is the woman that I posted about that died on the diving trip.  There are also many very nice comments that follow the article.

http://www.windsorstar.com/Budimir+Hussey+death+loss+community/1124483/story.html


(http://a123.g.akamai.net/f/123/12465/1d/www.windsorstar.com/budimir+hussey+death+loss+community/1124483/1124484.bin)

Helen Budimir-Hussey, pictured in this 2006 file photo, is being remembered for her tireless volunteer work and giving spirit after she died on Christmas Eve while scuba diving in the Caribbean.Photograph by: Scott Webster, The Windsor Star

A LaSalle woman is being remembered for her tireless volunteer work and giving spirit after she died on Christmas Eve while scuba diving in the Caribbean.

Helen Budimir-Hussey, 54, died after having trouble in the water off the island of Aruba.

“It was an accidental death,” said Roger Mann, a friend of the family.

Details of the cause of Budimir-Hussey’s death remain unclear. Mann said he heard Budimir-Hussey experienced breathing difficulties. “Unfortunately, they couldn’t revive her,” Mann said. “That’s all we know at this point.”

Mann said Budimir-Hussey and her family vacation in Aruba every year.

A mother of three, Budimir-Hussey was known for her extensive involvement in such community organizations as the Canadian Cancer Society, the Rotary Club of LaSalle-Centennial and the Serbian Heritage Museum and Library.

Mann, a fellow Rotary Club member, said Budimir-Hussey was a founding member of the club and her devotion to charitable causes was second to none.

“There’s something unique about Helen. She was the true definition of giving,” Mann said. “It’s a terrible loss. Not only for her family, but the community at large.”

For example, Mann said Budimir-Hussey was the lead organizer of the town’s annual Santa Claus parade, including this year’s event. “We used to call that Helen’s parade. She did it.”

Carol Cyphery, of the Essex County unit of the Canadian Cancer Society, said Budimir-Hussey was involved in the CCS for more than 30 years, previously serving as the unit’s manager and more recently as president of the unit’s volunteer council.

Cyphery said Budimir-Hussey lived the mission of the CCS in believing that a cure for cancer can be found. “She always felt that research was the key. She did a lot of work fundraising, trying to raise dollars and public awareness for the need for research to find a cure for cancer. That was her biggest passion, I would say.”

The cause hit close to home for Budimir-Hussey in 2006, when her eldest son Jordan died of a rare form of cancer at the age of 21.

Another group important to Budimir-Hussey was the Serbian Women’s Club of Windsor. Budimir-Hussey’s father was Yugoslavian-born Steve Budimir, owner of Windsor’s N&D grocery stores.

Club president Alexandra Budisavljevic said Budimir-Hussey was a faithful and ambitious member. “If you ever needed anything done, you called Helen,” Budisavljevic said.

Roger Mann described Budimir-Hussey as a driving force. “She juggled all these things. At the same time, she looked after her family very well. She always had this passion … the passion for giving. That’s what defined her, really.”

Budimir-Hussey is survived by her husband Terry, her university-age son MacKenzie and her youngest son Dylan, who’s still in elementary school.

Arrangements have been made with Families First Funeral Home, 3260 Dougall Ave. Visitation takes place from 2 to 5 p.m. Thursday, and 2 to 5 p.m. and 7 to 9 p.m. Friday. A service will take place at the funeral home 11:30 a.m. Saturday.

Budimir-Hussey’s family asks that any donations be given to the Canadian Cancer Society, as per Helen’s wishes.






Lovely photo of a lovely, giving woman....I'm just sorry I will remember the photo of her in the initial news article.
Aruba newspapers have NO respect for the deceased.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #789 1/1/09 -
Post by: klaasend on January 02, 2009, 11:47:49 PM
I think we need Kermit, Jen, or wingnut to come back and re-state the timelines as they know it.

I think we need Tim Miller to explain it to us.
Tim Miller was not on the persistence when the ROV video was taken on jan 7...John S. put him off the ship on Dec 30th....

No but I am sure Tim could answer if the FBI were involved. I am sure he could answer what the protocol was in turning over footage. I am sure he could answer if he was removed from the Persistence. I am sure he could answer if he felt John Silvetti was involved in a cover-up with the FBI. I think those answers would go a long way right now.


Ldstlou, you have convinced me.  Your explanations sound straightforward and credible. 

 ::MonkeyHaHa:: ::MonkeyCool::  How are her explanations any more credible than any one elses?  Because she spoke with Kyle or Jug?


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #789 1/1/09 -
Post by: truthseeker2 on January 02, 2009, 11:47:59 PM
http://www.nd.nl/artikelen/2009/januari/02/pvv-er-brinkman-uit-zijn-kritiek-op-zaak-holloway

Brinkman PVV'er from his criticism of Holloway case Published: 03 January 2009 05:00, last updated: 02 January 2009 21:43

by Dick Hofland

PVV-MP Hero Brinkman. | Nederlands Dagblad photo / Jaco Klamer
-------------------------------------------------- ------------------------------
THE HAGUE - The Holloway case in terms of PVV MP Hero Brinkman-to carelessly examined. During the visit of a delegation he dives in the case, but he also criticized the new management structure in the Antilles.



MP Hero Brinkman of the PVV appears next week in Aruba in the Natalee Holloway case. During the visit of a parliamentary delegation to the West, he speaks in the Advocate of the missing American teenager, several policemen and some former members of the Public Ministry. ,, The research is so fucked up.''

What can you do what Peter R. de Vries can not?
,, I wish that the case was a cover it. Because that likely to happen now. Peter R. de Vries has updated me about everything and I've read about the case, so I am well prepared. And I agreed that I tell him everything I know to do.''

What do you discover?
,, The Aruban Justice Minister Rudy Croes has been corrupt, but in this case I think he speaks the truth. Croes has suggested that the father of Joran van der Sloot in Aruba and the police were very good friends. That police chief said that he would have the son of his best friend could not continue. That explains why the investigation only after ten days was set in motion, while four hours after the disappearance of Natalee Joran already clear that there was closely involved.,,

You are also plans for the new governance structure of the West on such matters. Are not you afraid that you Antilles hence the cabinet hunts.
,, I say what I think and I see what happens. I'm starting Monday at the table with various people I have accused of corruption. I do not know how they will approach me, but I'm still welcome.''

What are you going to blame the West?
,, There is an agreement that the Netherlands seventy percent of the debt charity, and that control over administration and justice. That seems good, but what does the island of Curacao was the first council done? The private pension supplemented with 1.3 million euros. This is an geneerde form of self-enrichment which the dog does not eat bread.''

,, I foresee that in the West as quickly as possible the money would have to be as fast as possible to them. The negotiations on the constitutional changes are, unfortunately, wrong place. We ought to agree that they may make no new debt.''

I wonder if what I have bolded is translated properly?  Within 4 hours?  Could he be talking about the 4:00 am pickup of Joran by Paulus? Or, 4 hours after she was reported missing by the chaperone?

Wasn't Joran supposedly telling other students at school that Natalee drowned?  If she died at 3 or 4 a.m., Joran was at school by 8 am or so; that would be around 4 hours.

True.  Since he mentioned the polis and the friendship with Paulus I was just wondering if Paulus had contacted Van Der Sloot that morning and there is evidence of that Brinkman is aware of to prove it.  That would be quite a piece of evidence!!


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #789 1/1/09 -
Post by: Tamikosmom on January 02, 2009, 11:48:00 PM
LDSTLOU,
Again, I think you have failed to follow EVERY detail and words of Kyle himself. Kyle has stated that John S. had NO interest in the trap -- in fact he told Kyle "to never bring up the trap" again! Kyle told Freebirds that John S. has NEW business dealings in Aruba. Beth's brother (private eye) was flabbergasted to find out about the Jan. 7th pics in MARCH! That is NOT IMMEDIATELY. Kyle had no responsibilty to turn over ALL pics????? Well, he sure had responsibility to SELL the pics in February!

John did not believe Natalee was in that trap. They had other targets they had located and he wanted to focus on the other targets that were possibilites. Remember, they identified quite a few other possible targets that they were eager to look into. It wasn't because he was hiding anything in the trap, he felt they had eliminated the possibility that it was Natalee and wanet to get to other possibilities.

Janet..
This comment is what i find interesting.How could or did John Silvetti come to this conclusion and how would Ldstlou know this??Just a question...

According to Kyle Kingman ... John Silvetti had no interest in the contents of the trap/cage.  Justice for Natalee, closure for her family and ... accountability to those who dontated to the undertaking ... were not a consideration.  Silvetti had a self-serving motivation to look the other way as the enemy took possession of what could have been Natalee Holloway's remains.

Janet

++++++

KYLE KINGMAN - PRIVATE FORUM

Kyle: I did not feel the same and we had a major difference in opinion. He [John Silvetti] was the one who never pressed ALE to be completely open with us with the trap evidence. I would have forced them to. However, John was the one paying my invoices so I was forced to sit back and hope for the best.

Kyle: John told me then he didn't want to hear me ever mention the trap again.

Kyle: John definitely believed the Arubans at their every word

Kyle: John is not a believer in the trap. He took ALE's word as gospel that it wasn't case related, yet never studied the videos or bothered to inquire further. He had plans on doing business with Aruba and in S. America and he didn't want to hurt any feelings by talks hinting at lack of complete trust and friendship.

Kyle: The bags were removed just after the ROV got out of the way when the divers took the samples to their boat.... and took off



Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #789 1/1/09 -
Post by: Blue Moon on January 02, 2009, 11:54:51 PM
TexasMom, was that picture of the woman you just posted the one in the boat deceased that appeared in an Aruban newspaper? How sad that respect for her wasn't shown.  She appears to be a gift to society to be cherished not flashed before the world to see her last moment on earth.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #789 1/1/09 -
Post by: iris44 on January 02, 2009, 11:59:13 PM
I think we need Kermit, Jen, or wingnut to come back and re-state the timelines as they know it.

I think we need Tim Miller to explain it to us.
Tim Miller was not on the persistence when the ROV video was taken on jan 7...John S. put him off the ship on Dec 30th....

No but I am sure Tim could answer if the FBI were involved. I am sure he could answer what the protocol was in turning over footage. I am sure he could answer if he was removed from the Persistence. I am sure he could answer if he felt John Silvetti was involved in a cover-up with the FBI. I think those answers would go a long way right now.


Ldstlou, you have convinced me.  Your explanations sound straightforward and credible. 

 ::MonkeyHaHa:: ::MonkeyCool::  How are her explanations any more credible than any one elses?  Because she spoke with Kyle or Jug?

Just my opinion.  I'm not basing it on who she got the info from, just that the info seems to make sense.  I'm just not buying the conspiracy theories about the Persistence crew.  The Freebirds believed everything Kyle said and based their theories on his words, and if Kyle mislead them, the conclusions they drew cannot be correct.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #789 1/1/09 -
Post by: 2NJSons_Mom on January 03, 2009, 12:00:26 AM
LDSTLOU,
Again, I think you have failed to follow EVERY detail and words of Kyle himself. Kyle has stated that John S. had NO interest in the trap -- in fact he told Kyle "to never bring up the trap" again! Kyle told Freebirds that John S. has NEW business dealings in Aruba. Beth's brother (private eye) was flabbergasted to find out about the Jan. 7th pics in MARCH! That is NOT IMMEDIATELY. Kyle had no responsibilty to turn over ALL pics????? Well, he sure had responsibility to SELL the pics in February!

John did not believe Natalee was in that trap. They had other targets they had located and he wanted to focus on the other targets that were possibilites. Remember, they identified quite a few other possible targets that they were eager to look into. It wasn't because he was hiding anything in the trap, he felt they had eliminated the possibility that it was Natalee and wanet to get to other possibilities.

Janet..
This comment is what i find interesting.How could or did John Silvetti come to this conclusion and how would Ldstlou know this??Just a question...

According to Kyle Kingman ... John Silvetti had no interest in the contents of the trap/cage.  Justice for Natalee, closure for her family and ... accountability to those who dontated to the undertaking ... were not a consideration.  Silvetti had a self-serving motivation to look the other way as the enemy took possession of what could have been Natalee Holloway's remains.

Janet

++++++

KYLE KINGMAN - PRIVATE FORUM

Kyle: I did not feel the same and we had a major difference in opinion. He [John Silvetti] was the one who never pressed ALE to be completely open with us with the trap evidence. I would have forced them to. However, John was the one paying my invoices so I was forced to sit back and hope for the best.

Kyle: John told me then he didn't want to hear me ever mention the trap again.

Kyle: John definitely believed the Arubans at their every word

Kyle: John is not a believer in the trap. He took ALE's word as gospel that it wasn't case related, yet never studied the videos or bothered to inquire further. He had plans on doing business with Aruba and in S. America and he didn't want to hurt any feelings by talks hinting at lack of complete trust and friendship.

Kyle: The bags were removed just after the ROV got out of the way when the divers took the samples to their boat.... and took off



If OE didn't have diarrhea of the mouth through the internet, we would not be discussing any of this right now.  Whether his intentions were legitimate intially or not, it doesn't matter.  He created the cosmic WTF, imo.  Why?

Sorry to tag this on to your post, Janet, but I am heading out for the night...I hope...last night was not a good sleep night.

Will see you all later.  G'nite for now.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #789 1/1/09 -
Post by: wreck on January 03, 2009, 12:01:57 AM
I think we need Kermit, Jen, or wingnut to come back and re-state the timelines as they know it.

I think we need Tim Miller to explain it to us.
Tim Miller was not on the persistence when the ROV video was taken on jan 7...John S. put him off the ship on Dec 30th....

No but I am sure Tim could answer if the FBI were involved. I am sure he could answer what the protocol was in turning over footage. I am sure he could answer if he was removed from the Persistence. I am sure he could answer if he felt John Silvetti was involved in a cover-up with the FBI. I think those answers would go a long way right now.


Ldstlou, you have convinced me.  Your explanations sound straightforward and credible. 

 ::MonkeyHaHa:: ::MonkeyCool::  How are her explanations any more credible than any one elses?  Because she spoke with Kyle or Jug?

Just my opinion.  I'm not basing it on who she got the info from, just that the info seems to make sense.  I'm just not buying the conspiracy theories about the Persistence crew.  The Freebirds believed everything Kyle said and based their theories on his words, and if Kyle mislead them, the conclusions they drew cannot be correct.
So why would Kyle "mislead" Freebirds?  ::MonkeyConfused:: ::MonkeyNoNo:: ::MonkeyConfused:: ::MonkeyRoll:: ::MonkeyConfused::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #789 1/1/09 -
Post by: iris44 on January 03, 2009, 12:02:18 AM
http://www.nd.nl/artikelen/2009/januari/02/pvv-er-brinkman-uit-zijn-kritiek-op-zaak-holloway

Brinkman PVV'er from his criticism of Holloway case Published: 03 January 2009 05:00, last updated: 02 January 2009 21:43

by Dick Hofland

PVV-MP Hero Brinkman. | Nederlands Dagblad photo / Jaco Klamer
-------------------------------------------------- ------------------------------
THE HAGUE - The Holloway case in terms of PVV MP Hero Brinkman-to carelessly examined. During the visit of a delegation he dives in the case, but he also criticized the new management structure in the Antilles.



MP Hero Brinkman of the PVV appears next week in Aruba in the Natalee Holloway case. During the visit of a parliamentary delegation to the West, he speaks in the Advocate of the missing American teenager, several policemen and some former members of the Public Ministry. ,, The research is so fucked up.''

What can you do what Peter R. de Vries can not?
,, I wish that the case was a cover it. Because that likely to happen now. Peter R. de Vries has updated me about everything and I've read about the case, so I am well prepared. And I agreed that I tell him everything I know to do.''

What do you discover?
,, The Aruban Justice Minister Rudy Croes has been corrupt, but in this case I think he speaks the truth. Croes has suggested that the father of Joran van der Sloot in Aruba and the police were very good friends. That police chief said that he would have the son of his best friend could not continue. That explains why the investigation only after ten days was set in motion, while four hours after the disappearance of Natalee Joran already clear that there was closely involved.,,

You are also plans for the new governance structure of the West on such matters. Are not you afraid that you Antilles hence the cabinet hunts.
,, I say what I think and I see what happens. I'm starting Monday at the table with various people I have accused of corruption. I do not know how they will approach me, but I'm still welcome.''

What are you going to blame the West?
,, There is an agreement that the Netherlands seventy percent of the debt charity, and that control over administration and justice. That seems good, but what does the island of Curacao was the first council done? The private pension supplemented with 1.3 million euros. This is an geneerde form of self-enrichment which the dog does not eat bread.''

,, I foresee that in the West as quickly as possible the money would have to be as fast as possible to them. The negotiations on the constitutional changes are, unfortunately, wrong place. We ought to agree that they may make no new debt.''

I wonder if what I have bolded is translated properly?  Within 4 hours?  Could he be talking about the 4:00 am pickup of Joran by Paulus? Or, 4 hours after she was reported missing by the chaperone?

Wasn't Joran supposedly telling other students at school that Natalee drowned?  If she died at 3 or 4 a.m., Joran was at school by 8 am or so; that would be around 4 hours.

True.  Since he mentioned the polis and the friendship with Paulus I was just wondering if Paulus had contacted Van Der Sloot that morning and there is evidence of that Brinkman is aware of to prove it.  That would be quite a piece of evidence!!

Seems very possible Paulus contacted VDS early that morning.  Geez, they should have no problem prosecuting Joran now with all this evidence!


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #789 1/1/09 -
Post by: texasmom on January 03, 2009, 12:02:40 AM
Quantico is a Marine Corp Base that houses among other things the FBI academy.

So were these agents onboard from the regular FBI which is in Washington, DC, or from Bardados?  There are some lab facilities at Quantico but the forensic samples in the plastic bags were only in the ALE dive boat was my understanding from Kyle's posts.

Just following along, here, Anna....my thoughts were along the same lines.

Someone from Quantico could be a Marine, lol. 


Marine Corps Base Quantico
It's called the "Crossroads of the Marine Corps," and during its 80 year tenure on the approximately 100 square miles of land located along the western bank of the Potomac River, Marine Corps Base Quantico has been a training site for Marines and a birthing place of Marine Corps concepts.

The Marine Corps Base provides functional support for the overall Quantico mission including the provision of personnel administration, facilities, logistics, financial security, safety, public information, legal, base operations, training, administration, morale, welfare and recreation support for organic and tenant organizations.


Didn't Dompig train at Quantico?? Maybe HE was on board the Persistence!

That's really a scary thought!    ::MonkeyShocked:: ::MonkeyNoNo::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #789 1/1/09 -
Post by: texasmom on January 03, 2009, 12:03:22 AM
TexasMom, was that picture of the woman you just posted the one in the boat deceased that appeared in an Aruban newspaper? How sad that respect for her wasn't shown.  She appears to be a gift to society to be cherished not flashed before the world to see her last moment on earth.

Yes, I believe it's the same woman.  Very sad.   ::MonkeyNoNo::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #789 1/1/09 -
Post by: cajun miracle on January 03, 2009, 12:04:20 AM
It is now 2009 and I thank all of you for allowing me to be a part of the Monkey cage. Since Red has said that things WILL be happening, I ask all of you to just have patience and then we will have answers. We are here because we all care about Natalee and her family. Many of the recent posts are very confusing but I still have faith that justice will be won. We all must keep asking questions and searching for the truth.

God Bless all of you for caring.
Cajun Miracle


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #789 1/1/09 -
Post by: truthseeker2 on January 03, 2009, 12:04:25 AM
http://www.nd.nl/artikelen/2009/januari/02/pvv-er-brinkman-uit-zijn-kritiek-op-zaak-holloway

Brinkman PVV'er from his criticism of Holloway case Published: 03 January 2009 05:00, last updated: 02 January 2009 21:43

by Dick Hofland

PVV-MP Hero Brinkman. | Nederlands Dagblad photo / Jaco Klamer
-------------------------------------------------- ------------------------------
THE HAGUE - The Holloway case in terms of PVV MP Hero Brinkman-to carelessly examined. During the visit of a delegation he dives in the case, but he also criticized the new management structure in the Antilles.



MP Hero Brinkman of the PVV appears next week in Aruba in the Natalee Holloway case. During the visit of a parliamentary delegation to the West, he speaks in the Advocate of the missing American teenager, several policemen and some former members of the Public Ministry. ,, The research is so fucked up.''

What can you do what Peter R. de Vries can not?
,, I wish that the case was a cover it. Because that likely to happen now. Peter R. de Vries has updated me about everything and I've read about the case, so I am well prepared. And I agreed that I tell him everything I know to do.''

What do you discover?
,, The Aruban Justice Minister Rudy Croes has been corrupt, but in this case I think he speaks the truth. Croes has suggested that the father of Joran van der Sloot in Aruba and the police were very good friends. That police chief said that he would have the son of his best friend could not continue. That explains why the investigation only after ten days was set in motion, while four hours after the disappearance of Natalee Joran already clear that there was closely involved.,,

You are also plans for the new governance structure of the West on such matters. Are not you afraid that you Antilles hence the cabinet hunts.
,, I say what I think and I see what happens. I'm starting Monday at the table with various people I have accused of corruption. I do not know how they will approach me, but I'm still welcome.''

What are you going to blame the West?
,, There is an agreement that the Netherlands seventy percent of the debt charity, and that control over administration and justice. That seems good, but what does the island of Curacao was the first council done? The private pension supplemented with 1.3 million euros. This is an geneerde form of self-enrichment which the dog does not eat bread.''

,, I foresee that in the West as quickly as possible the money would have to be as fast as possible to them. The negotiations on the constitutional changes are, unfortunately, wrong place. We ought to agree that they may make no new debt.''

I wonder if what I have bolded is translated properly?  Within 4 hours?  Could he be talking about the 4:00 am pickup of Joran by Paulus? Or, 4 hours after she was reported missing by the chaperone?

Wasn't Joran supposedly telling other students at school that Natalee drowned?  If she died at 3 or 4 a.m., Joran was at school by 8 am or so; that would be around 4 hours.

True.  Since he mentioned the polis and the friendship with Paulus I was just wondering if Paulus had contacted Van Der Sloot that morning and there is evidence of that Brinkman is aware of to prove it.  That would be quite a piece of evidence!!

Seems very possible Paulus contacted VDS early that morning.  Geez, they should have no problem prosecuting Joran now with all this evidence!

I don't know if that is what he meant, but that statement sure made me wonder.  Red said things were happening...


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #789 1/1/09 -
Post by: klaasend on January 03, 2009, 12:05:01 AM
I think we need Kermit, Jen, or wingnut to come back and re-state the timelines as they know it.

I think we need Tim Miller to explain it to us.
Tim Miller was not on the persistence when the ROV video was taken on jan 7...John S. put him off the ship on Dec 30th....

No but I am sure Tim could answer if the FBI were involved. I am sure he could answer what the protocol was in turning over footage. I am sure he could answer if he was removed from the Persistence. I am sure he could answer if he felt John Silvetti was involved in a cover-up with the FBI. I think those answers would go a long way right now.


Ldstlou, you have convinced me.  Your explanations sound straightforward and credible. 

 ::MonkeyHaHa:: ::MonkeyCool::  How are her explanations any more credible than any one elses?  Because she spoke with Kyle or Jug?

Just my opinion.  I'm not basing it on who she got the info from, just that the info seems to make sense.  I'm just not buying the conspiracy theories about the Persistence crew.  The Freebirds believed everything Kyle said and based their theories on his words, and if Kyle mislead them, the conclusions they drew cannot be correct.

Since Kyle was the spokesperson for the Persistence search, as proven in the blog he maintained to keep people updated on the progress, why would KYLE then intentionally give false information to those in the Freebird forum?  Why should we not believe Kyle's own words to be true?  Or is he a liar?


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #789 1/1/09 -
Post by: iris44 on January 03, 2009, 12:06:01 AM
I think we need Kermit, Jen, or wingnut to come back and re-state the timelines as they know it.

I think we need Tim Miller to explain it to us.
Tim Miller was not on the persistence when the ROV video was taken on jan 7...John S. put him off the ship on Dec 30th....

No but I am sure Tim could answer if the FBI were involved. I am sure he could answer what the protocol was in turning over footage. I am sure he could answer if he was removed from the Persistence. I am sure he could answer if he felt John Silvetti was involved in a cover-up with the FBI. I think those answers would go a long way right now.


Ldstlou, you have convinced me.  Your explanations sound straightforward and credible. 

 ::MonkeyHaHa:: ::MonkeyCool::  How are her explanations any more credible than any one elses?  Because she spoke with Kyle or Jug?

Just my opinion.  I'm not basing it on who she got the info from, just that the info seems to make sense.  I'm just not buying the conspiracy theories about the Persistence crew.  The Freebirds believed everything Kyle said and based their theories on his words, and if Kyle mislead them, the conclusions they drew cannot be correct.
So why would Kyle "mislead" Freebirds?  ::MonkeyConfused:: ::MonkeyNoNo:: ::MonkeyConfused:: ::MonkeyRoll:: ::MonkeyConfused::

Could be millions of reasons!  People lie to me constantly (but then, I'm an auditor). The only ones I can catch consistently are my own family members!  And sometimes my kids can still fool me. (One's a cop, he's really good!)


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #789 1/1/09 -
Post by: Blue Moon on January 03, 2009, 12:08:17 AM
It is now 2009 and I thank all of you for allowing me to be a part of the Monkey cage. Since Red has said that things WILL be happening, I ask all of you to just have patience and then we will have answers. We are here because we all care about Natalee and her family. Many of the recent posts are very confusing but I still have faith that justice will be won. We all must keep asking questions and searching for the truth.

God Bless all of you for caring.
Cajun Miracle

Your frog looks like it is saying "Ribbet, Ribbet".

And you are right we all are here for Natalee and true Justice for her and her family.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #789 1/1/09 -
Post by: truthseeker2 on January 03, 2009, 12:08:27 AM

Could be millions of reasons!  People lie to me constantly (but then, I'm an auditor). The only ones I can catch consistently are my own family members!  And sometimes my kids can still fool me. (One's a cop, he's really good!)


 ::MonkeyShocked:: Yikes!  Of the IRS variety???


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #789 1/1/09 -
Post by: wreck on January 03, 2009, 12:09:13 AM
Iris:
Quote
Could be millions of reasons!  People lie to me constantly (but then, I'm an auditor). The only ones I can catch consistently are my own family members!  And sometimes my kids can still fool me. (One's a cop, he's really good!)
I'm not doubting he COULD lie - I'm asking WHY would he?? Who/what does that serve?


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #789 1/1/09 -
Post by: billb's daughter on January 03, 2009, 12:09:16 AM
I think we need Kermit, Jen, or wingnut to come back and re-state the timelines as they know it.

I think we need Tim Miller to explain it to us.
Tim Miller was not on the persistence when the ROV video was taken on jan 7...John S. put him off the ship on Dec 30th....

No but I am sure Tim could answer if the FBI were involved. I am sure he could answer what the protocol was in turning over footage. I am sure he could answer if he was removed from the Persistence. I am sure he could answer if he felt John Silvetti was involved in a cover-up with the FBI. I think those answers would go a long way right now.


Ldstlou, you have convinced me.  Your explanations sound straightforward and credible. 

 ::MonkeyHaHa:: ::MonkeyCool::  How are her explanations any more credible than any one elses?  Because she spoke with Kyle or Jug?

Just my opinion.  I'm not basing it on who she got the info from, just that the info seems to make sense.  I'm just not buying the conspiracy theories about the Persistence crew.  The Freebirds believed everything Kyle said and based their theories on his words, and if Kyle mislead them, the conclusions they drew cannot be correct.
So why would Kyle "mislead" Freebirds?  ::MonkeyConfused:: ::MonkeyNoNo:: ::MonkeyConfused:: ::MonkeyRoll:: ::MonkeyConfused::

Could be millions of reasons!  People lie to me constantly (but then, I'm an auditor). The only ones I can catch consistently are my own family members!  And sometimes my kids can still fool me. (One's a cop, he's really good!)
iris44....good to know...if i am every audited by the irs....I hope you are the auditor.... ::MonkeyWink:: ::cartwheel::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #789 1/1/09 -
Post by: iris44 on January 03, 2009, 12:10:53 AM
I think we need Kermit, Jen, or wingnut to come back and re-state the timelines as they know it.

I think we need Tim Miller to explain it to us.
Tim Miller was not on the persistence when the ROV video was taken on jan 7...John S. put him off the ship on Dec 30th....

No but I am sure Tim could answer if the FBI were involved. I am sure he could answer what the protocol was in turning over footage. I am sure he could answer if he was removed from the Persistence. I am sure he could answer if he felt John Silvetti was involved in a cover-up with the FBI. I think those answers would go a long way right now.


Ldstlou, you have convinced me.  Your explanations sound straightforward and credible. 

 ::MonkeyHaHa:: ::MonkeyCool::  How are her explanations any more credible than any one elses?  Because she spoke with Kyle or Jug?

Just my opinion.  I'm not basing it on who she got the info from, just that the info seems to make sense.  I'm just not buying the conspiracy theories about the Persistence crew.  The Freebirds believed everything Kyle said and based their theories on his words, and if Kyle mislead them, the conclusions they drew cannot be correct.

Since Kyle was the spokesperson for the Persistence search, as proven in the blog he maintained to keep people updated on the progress, why would KYLE then intentionally give false information to those in the Freebird forum?  Why should we not believe Kyle's own words to be true?  Or is he a liar?

What I have to remind myself when I can't figure out why someone is doing something, is that most people have their own agenda in mind.  There are some good people, but most I deal with in the business world are looking out for Numero Uno!  It's as simple as that.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #789 1/1/09 -
Post by: Blue Moon on January 03, 2009, 12:11:19 AM
I think we need Kermit, Jen, or wingnut to come back and re-state the timelines as they know it.

I think we need Tim Miller to explain it to us.
Tim Miller was not on the persistence when the ROV video was taken on jan 7...John S. put him off the ship on Dec 30th....

No but I am sure Tim could answer if the FBI were involved. I am sure he could answer what the protocol was in turning over footage. I am sure he could answer if he was removed from the Persistence. I am sure he could answer if he felt John Silvetti was involved in a cover-up with the FBI. I think those answers would go a long way right now.


Ldstlou, you have convinced me.  Your explanations sound straightforward and credible. 

 ::MonkeyHaHa:: ::MonkeyCool::  How are her explanations any more credible than any one elses?  Because she spoke with Kyle or Jug?

Just my opinion.  I'm not basing it on who she got the info from, just that the info seems to make sense.  I'm just not buying the conspiracy theories about the Persistence crew.  The Freebirds believed everything Kyle said and based their theories on his words, and if Kyle mislead them, the conclusions they drew cannot be correct.
So why would Kyle "mislead" Freebirds?  ::MonkeyConfused:: ::MonkeyNoNo:: ::MonkeyConfused:: ::MonkeyRoll:: ::MonkeyConfused::

Could be millions of reasons!  People lie to me constantly (but then, I'm an auditor). The only ones I can catch consistently are my own family members!  And sometimes my kids can still fool me. (One's a cop, he's really good!)
iris44....good to know...if i am every audited by the irs....I hope you are the auditor.... ::MonkeyWink:: ::cartwheel::

Me too Iris.  (Note to Klaasend-NEVER give out my email address to Iris.  thanks)
 ::MonkeyCool:: ::MonkeyWaa::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #789 1/1/09 -
Post by: texasmom on January 03, 2009, 12:11:38 AM
billb    ::MonkeyLaugh::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #789 1/1/09 -
Post by: iris44 on January 03, 2009, 12:13:17 AM
I think we need Kermit, Jen, or wingnut to come back and re-state the timelines as they know it.

I think we need Tim Miller to explain it to us.
Tim Miller was not on the persistence when the ROV video was taken on jan 7...John S. put him off the ship on Dec 30th....

No but I am sure Tim could answer if the FBI were involved. I am sure he could answer what the protocol was in turning over footage. I am sure he could answer if he was removed from the Persistence. I am sure he could answer if he felt John Silvetti was involved in a cover-up with the FBI. I think those answers would go a long way right now.


Ldstlou, you have convinced me.  Your explanations sound straightforward and credible. 

 ::MonkeyHaHa:: ::MonkeyCool::  How are her explanations any more credible than any one elses?  Because she spoke with Kyle or Jug?

Just my opinion.  I'm not basing it on who she got the info from, just that the info seems to make sense.  I'm just not buying the conspiracy theories about the Persistence crew.  The Freebirds believed everything Kyle said and based their theories on his words, and if Kyle mislead them, the conclusions they drew cannot be correct.
So why would Kyle "mislead" Freebirds?  ::MonkeyConfused:: ::MonkeyNoNo:: ::MonkeyConfused:: ::MonkeyRoll:: ::MonkeyConfused::

Could be millions of reasons!  People lie to me constantly (but then, I'm an auditor). The only ones I can catch consistently are my own family members!  And sometimes my kids can still fool me. (One's a cop, he's really good!)
iris44....good to know...if i am every audited by the irs....I hope you are the auditor.... ::MonkeyWink:: ::cartwheel::

I'm easy!!  (In addition to gullible).


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #789 1/1/09 -
Post by: Tamikosmom on January 03, 2009, 12:13:36 AM
Quantico is a Marine Corp Base that houses among other things the FBI academy.

So were these agents onboard from the regular FBI which is in Washington, DC, or from Bardados?  There are some lab facilities at Quantico but the forensic samples in the plastic bags were only in the ALE dive boat was my understanding from Kyle's posts.

Just following along, here, Anna....my thoughts were along the same lines.

Someone from Quantico could be a Marine, lol. 


Marine Corps Base Quantico
It's called the "Crossroads of the Marine Corps," and during its 80 year tenure on the approximately 100 square miles of land located along the western bank of the Potomac River, Marine Corps Base Quantico has been a training site for Marines and a birthing place of Marine Corps concepts.

The Marine Corps Base provides functional support for the overall Quantico mission including the provision of personnel administration, facilities, logistics, financial security, safety, public information, legal, base operations, training, administration, morale, welfare and recreation support for organic and tenant organizations.


Didn't Dompig train at Quantico?? Maybe HE was on board the Persistence!

That's really a scary thought!    ::MonkeyShocked:: ::MonkeyNoNo::

 ::MonkeyHaHa::

Good Night texasmom.

jANET


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #789 1/1/09 -
Post by: San on January 03, 2009, 12:13:43 AM
It is now 2009 and I thank all of you for allowing me to be a part of the Monkey cage. Since Red has said that things WILL be happening, I ask all of you to just have patience and then we will have answers. We are here because we all care about Natalee and her family. Many of the recent posts are very confusing but I still have faith that justice will be won. We all must keep asking questions and searching for the truth.

God Bless all of you for caring.
Cajun Miracle

I agree.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #789 1/1/09 -
Post by: Tamikosmom on January 03, 2009, 12:17:25 AM
GOOD NIGHT MONKEYS!!  GOOD NIGHT ZOOKEEPERS!!

Janet
9:20 PM PT


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #789 1/1/09 -
Post by: billb's daughter on January 03, 2009, 12:17:36 AM
I think we need Kermit, Jen, or wingnut to come back and re-state the timelines as they know it.

I think we need Tim Miller to explain it to us.
Tim Miller was not on the persistence when the ROV video was taken on jan 7...John S. put him off the ship on Dec 30th....

No but I am sure Tim could answer if the FBI were involved. I am sure he could answer what the protocol was in turning over footage. I am sure he could answer if he was removed from the Persistence. I am sure he could answer if he felt John Silvetti was involved in a cover-up with the FBI. I think those answers would go a long way right now.


Ldstlou, you have convinced me.  Your explanations sound straightforward and credible. 

 ::MonkeyHaHa:: ::MonkeyCool::  How are her explanations any more credible than any one elses?  Because she spoke with Kyle or Jug?

Just my opinion.  I'm not basing it on who she got the info from, just that the info seems to make sense.  I'm just not buying the conspiracy theories about the Persistence crew.  The Freebirds believed everything Kyle said and based their theories on his words, and if Kyle mislead them, the conclusions they drew cannot be correct.
So why would Kyle "mislead" Freebirds?  ::MonkeyConfused:: ::MonkeyNoNo:: ::MonkeyConfused:: ::MonkeyRoll:: ::MonkeyConfused::

Could be millions of reasons!  People lie to me constantly (but then, I'm an auditor). The only ones I can catch consistently are my own family members!  And sometimes my kids can still fool me. (One's a cop, he's really good!)
iris44....good to know...if i am every audited by the irs....I hope you are the auditor.... ::MonkeyWink:: ::cartwheel::

I'm easy!!  (In addition to gullible).
Iris....just to cover all bases....we're not related...right?  ::MonkeyCool:: ::MonkeyWink:: ::cartwheel::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #789 1/1/09 -
Post by: Anna on January 03, 2009, 12:17:38 AM
My impression is that YOUNG Kyle was talking and telling tales out of school, sotaspeak, spilling the beans where he thought it would not be seen.  Trashing his boss as many of us have wanted to do, etc.

Then very next job, low and behold, who is in charge but same boss.

OOPS!   ::MonkeyShocked::

Better backtrack and try to repair before boss sees it?  In such specialized area of work, can it be impossible to avoid running into or working for the same people?

Just a thought on what might have happened.






Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #789 1/1/09 -
Post by: wreck on January 03, 2009, 12:19:43 AM
My impression is that YOUNG Kyle was talking and telling tales out of school, sotaspeak, spilling the beans where he thought it would not be seen.  Trashing his boss as many of us have wanted to do, etc.

Then very next job, low and behold, who is in charge but same boss.

OOPS!   ::MonkeyShocked::

Better backtrack and try to repair before boss sees it?  In such specialized area of work, can it be impossible to avoid running into or working for the same people?

Just a thought on what might have happened.





I think you are perceptive!


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #789 1/1/09 -
Post by: Tamikosmom on January 03, 2009, 12:20:04 AM


I'm easy!!  (In addition to gullible).

[/quote]

Me too!!  I am also very compromising.  I have no idea why Mum called me a pitbull.

 ::MonkeyHaHa::

Janet


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #789 1/1/09 -
Post by: Tamikosmom on January 03, 2009, 12:21:20 AM

I'm easy!!  (In addition to gullible).



Me too!!  I am also very compromising.  I have no idea why Mum called me a pitbull.

 ::MonkeyHaHa::

Janet


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #789 1/1/09 -
Post by: billb's daughter on January 03, 2009, 12:24:51 AM
My impression is that YOUNG Kyle was talking and telling tales out of school, sotaspeak, spilling the beans where he thought it would not be seen.  Trashing his boss as many of us have wanted to do, etc.

Then very next job, low and behold, who is in charge but same boss.

OOPS!   ::MonkeyShocked::

Better backtrack and try to repair before boss sees it?  In such specialized area of work, can it be impossible to avoid running into or working for the same people?

Just a thought on what might have happened.





John S and kyle work in a very small pool of expertize.....I'm probably more cynical than you may be Anna....
At some point, after the persistence crew, led by John S as project manager...strike a deal with the devil (aruba), good things came to John S (company picking up a Netherlands  branch) and kyle's good fortune with his "big bucks" jobs through the Netherlands branch....
Somethings not right.... ::MonkeyCool::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #789 1/1/09 -
Post by: iris44 on January 03, 2009, 12:26:09 AM

iris44....good to know...if i am every audited by the irs....I hope you are the auditor.... ::MonkeyWink:: ::cartwheel::
[/quote]

I'm easy!!  (In addition to gullible).
[/quote]
Iris....just to cover all bases....we're not related...right?  ::MonkeyCool:: ::MonkeyWink:: ::cartwheel::
[/quote]

billb, you can relax.  My firm actually represents clients who are being audited by the IRS.  (We're the good guys!). 


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #789 1/1/09 -
Post by: billb's daughter on January 03, 2009, 12:28:56 AM

iris44....good to know...if i am every audited by the irs....I hope you are the auditor.... ::MonkeyWink:: ::cartwheel::

I'm easy!!  (In addition to gullible).
[/quote]
Iris....just to cover all bases....we're not related...right?  ::MonkeyCool:: ::MonkeyWink:: ::cartwheel::
[/quote]

billb, you can relax.  My firm actually represents clients who are being audited by the IRS.  (We're the good guys!). 
[/quote]
Another good thing to know! I like you, Iris 44! My people may call your people..... ::MonkeyCool:: ::MonkeyDance:: ::MonkeyDance::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #789 1/1/09 -
Post by: San on January 03, 2009, 12:29:06 AM
My impression is that YOUNG Kyle was talking and telling tales out of school, sotaspeak, spilling the beans where he thought it would not be seen.  Trashing his boss as many of us have wanted to do, etc.

Then very next job, low and behold, who is in charge but same boss.

OOPS!   ::MonkeyShocked::

Better backtrack and try to repair before boss sees it?  In such specialized area of work, can it be impossible to avoid running into or working for the same people?

Just a thought on what might have happened.


Well then this is a lesson learned in life.  Don't shoot your mouth off because you never know who you are speaking to.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #789 1/1/09 -
Post by: Anna on January 03, 2009, 12:30:40 AM
My impression is that YOUNG Kyle was talking and telling tales out of school, sotaspeak, spilling the beans where he thought it would not be seen.  Trashing his boss as many of us have wanted to do, etc.

Then very next job, low and behold, who is in charge but same boss.

OOPS!   ::MonkeyShocked::

Better backtrack and try to repair before boss sees it?  In such specialized area of work, can it be impossible to avoid running into or working for the same people?

Just a thought on what might have happened.





John S and kyle work in a very small pool of expertize.....I'm probably more cynical than you may be Anna....
At some point, after the persistence crew, led by John S as project manager...strike a deal with the devil (aruba), good things came to John S (company picking up a Netherlands  branch) and kyle's good fortune with his "big bucks" jobs through the Netherlands branch....
Somethings not right.... ::MonkeyCool::


Well, I was going for the more subtle appraoch, lol.

But was thinking along the same lines, just sort of easing into it gradually.   ::MonkeyCool::

Lots of the rigs in the Gulf Coast belong to Royal Dutch Petroleum right off our own coast.

Just saying. . . . . ::MonkeyNoNo::



Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #789 1/1/09 -
Post by: texasmom on January 03, 2009, 12:31:01 AM
GOOD NIGHT MONKEYS!!  GOOD NIGHT ZOOKEEPERS!!

Janet
9:20 PM PT

Goodnight Janet!   ::MonkeyCool::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #789 1/1/09 -
Post by: Anna on January 03, 2009, 12:31:35 AM
My impression is that YOUNG Kyle was talking and telling tales out of school, sotaspeak, spilling the beans where he thought it would not be seen.  Trashing his boss as many of us have wanted to do, etc.

Then very next job, low and behold, who is in charge but same boss.

OOPS!   ::MonkeyShocked::

Better backtrack and try to repair before boss sees it?  In such specialized area of work, can it be impossible to avoid running into or working for the same people?

Just a thought on what might have happened.


Well then this is a lesson learned in life.  Don't shoot your mouth off because you never know who you are speaking to.

And for damned sure, don't put it in writing!!!!



Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #789 1/1/09 -
Post by: Anna on January 03, 2009, 12:34:16 AM
http://www.nd.nl/artikelen/2009/januari/02/pvv-er-brinkman-uit-zijn-kritiek-op-zaak-holloway

Brinkman PVV'er from his criticism of Holloway case Published: 03 January 2009 05:00, last updated: 02 January 2009 21:43

by Dick Hofland

PVV-MP Hero Brinkman. | Nederlands Dagblad photo / Jaco Klamer
-------------------------------------------------- ------------------------------
THE HAGUE - The Holloway case in terms of PVV MP Hero Brinkman-to carelessly examined. During the visit of a delegation he dives in the case, but he also criticized the new management structure in the Antilles.



MP Hero Brinkman of the PVV appears next week in Aruba in the Natalee Holloway case. During the visit of a parliamentary delegation to the West, he speaks in the Advocate of the missing American teenager, several policemen and some former members of the Public Ministry. ,, The research is so fucked up.''  
What can you do what Peter R. de Vries can not?
,, I wish that the case was a cover it. Because that likely to happen now. Peter R. de Vries has updated me about everything and I've read about the case, so I am well prepared. And I agreed that I tell him everything I know to do.''

What do you discover?
,, The Aruban Justice Minister Rudy Croes has been corrupt, but in this case I think he speaks the truth. Croes has suggested that the father of Joran van der Sloot in Aruba and the police were very good friends. That police chief said that he would have the son of his best friend could not continue. That explains why the investigation only after ten days was set in motion, while four hours after the disappearance of Natalee Joran already clear that there was closely involved.,,

You are also plans for the new governance structure of the West on such matters. Are not you afraid that you Antilles hence the cabinet hunts.
,, I say what I think and I see what happens. I'm starting Monday at the table with various people I have accused of corruption. I do not know how they will approach me, but I'm still welcome.''

What are you going to blame the West?
,, There is an agreement that the Netherlands seventy percent of the debt charity, and that control over administration and justice. That seems good, but what does the island of Curacao was the first council done? The private pension supplemented with 1.3 million euros. This is an geneerde form of self-enrichment which the dog does not eat bread.''

,, I foresee that in the West as quickly as possible the money would have to be as fast as possible to them. The negotiations on the constitutional changes are, unfortunately, wrong place. We ought to agree that they may make no new debt.''

Thanx Klaas!


Well, the above is what jumped out it me right away.  Was this in a major newspaper?  Very colorful language, is it not?
]


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #789 1/1/09 -
Post by: Blue Moon on January 03, 2009, 12:34:36 AM
My impression is that YOUNG Kyle was talking and telling tales out of school, sotaspeak, spilling the beans where he thought it would not be seen.  Trashing his boss as many of us have wanted to do, etc.

Then very next job, low and behold, who is in charge but same boss.

OOPS!   ::MonkeyShocked::

Better backtrack and try to repair before boss sees it?  In such specialized area of work, can it be impossible to avoid running into or working for the same people?

Just a thought on what might have happened.


Well then this is a lesson learned in life.  Don't shoot your mouth off because you never know who you are speaking to.

And for damned sure, don't put it in writing!!!!



And not on the internet OR email.  I tell people all the time before they hit that send button in email to first see who they are sending it to, then make sure it is NOT to the entire organization.  Once they do that, I cannot help them.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #789 1/1/09 -
Post by: San on January 03, 2009, 12:46:08 AM
My impression is that YOUNG Kyle was talking and telling tales out of school, sotaspeak, spilling the beans where he thought it would not be seen.  Trashing his boss as many of us have wanted to do, etc.

Then very next job, low and behold, who is in charge but same boss.

OOPS!   ::MonkeyShocked::

Better backtrack and try to repair before boss sees it?  In such specialized area of work, can it be impossible to avoid running into or working for the same people?

Just a thought on what might have happened.


Well then this is a lesson learned in life.  Don't shoot your mouth off because you never know who you are speaking to.

And for damned sure, don't put it in writing!!!!



Exactly Anna.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #789 1/1/09 -
Post by: Anna on January 03, 2009, 12:49:24 AM
Money talks!  But it can't sing and dance and it can't walk!


http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QQLWF_ItzYs


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #789 1/1/09 -
Post by: Blue Moon on January 03, 2009, 12:49:47 AM
Time for me to call it a night.  Have a good one all. :2waver: :2waver:


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #789 1/1/09 -
Post by: MuffyBee on January 03, 2009, 12:52:19 AM
Time for me to call it a night.  Have a good one all. :2waver: :2waver:

Good night BlueMoon (http://bestsmileys.com/tropheys/3.gif) For reading all those pages... ::MonkeyCool::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #789 1/1/09 -
Post by: texasmom on January 03, 2009, 12:53:19 AM
Time for me to call it a night.  Have a good one all. :2waver: :2waver:

Goodnight Blue Moon!   ::MonkeyCool::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #789 1/1/09 -
Post by: wreck on January 03, 2009, 12:55:26 AM
Time for me to call it a night.  Have a good one all. :2waver: :2waver:

Good night BlueMoon (http://bestsmileys.com/tropheys/3.gif) For reading all those pages... ::MonkeyCool::
I'm leaving as well! I'm encouraged about Red's comments tonight -- I hope the "stars are aligning" indeed!


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #789 1/1/09 -
Post by: MuffyBee on January 03, 2009, 01:02:29 AM
Good night Wreck  (http://bestsmileys.com/sleeping/18.gif)


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #789 1/1/09 -
Post by: texasmom on January 03, 2009, 01:12:57 AM
Goodnight wreck!  ::MonkeyCool::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #789 1/1/09 -
Post by: Keepthefaith on January 03, 2009, 01:52:12 AM
                                         JUSTICE FOR NATALEE

                               THE GLORY IS IN BRINGING HER HOME 

                                  ::MonkeyRoll::       ::MonkeyRoll::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #789 1/1/09 -
Post by: texasmom on January 03, 2009, 01:53:26 AM
Article in tomorrow's Awe Mainta.  I'm hoping Cageman or Sandy Leiva (or anyone who can) will tell us more about what it says.  My interpretation is that the 55 year old woman's body was taken back for further review (another autopsy?) by law enforcement from her funeral. 

http://awemainta.com/home/

1/3/2009 Awe Mainta

Front Page
(http://i21.photobucket.com/albums/b258/texasmom55/Misc%20News%204/01032009AweMaintaFP.jpg)

Papiamentu translation:

entrante today free!!!

curpa during burial confisca everybody owing to stay babuca yesterday tardi, after cu had ceremonia of burial, as the.o. respons in catholic santa ana at north, for after compaña the difunto for his ultimo lugar of rest, for fiscal of ministerio publico owing to let confisca the cadaver.

Page 3

(http://i21.photobucket.com/albums/b258/texasmom55/Misc%20News%204/01032009AweMaintaPg3.jpg)

Papiamentu translation:

first of close kelder yesterday tardi fiscal owing to confisca cadaver of fayecida

everybody owing to stay babuca yesterday tardi, after cu had ceremonia of burial, as the.o. respons in catholic santa ana at north, for after compaña the difunto for his ultimo lugar of rest, for fiscal of ministerio publico owing to let confisca the cadaver. the presentenan not owing to like the form of proceder here mucho y even owing to demanda of wanted see documento pakico ministerio publico wanted confisca cadaver of the madam, beatrix stella rua-correa of 55 year, that owing to fayece day 30 of december ultimo. the presentenan even owing to deal of stroba police of haci his trabao y after of menasa they cu will actua cu hand duro, t’e polisnan self have to owing to carga the box bek p’e car of funeraria. awemainta buscando informacion of vocero of ministerio publico, the unique informacion cu we can owing to achieve is, cu have one investigacion is tumando lugar. y for determina cause exact of dead of the fayecida, sra. beatrix stella rua-correa, have to owing to let confisca the cadaver for after haci one autopsia of acuerdo cu ley.pero for of hendenan cu conoce the fayecida,  they're achieve the caso here very odd, because sra. beatrix stella rua-correa have assure more of 7 year bad y at cama. pesey all denuncia cu can have haci for her.o. bisiñanan is completamente false. question is stay, cu after of haci the autopsia, for cual not have day still, will have another ceremonia the.o. respons for bury the difunto?


*I also read in her obituary that she was employed by National Car Rental & Alamo Car Rental and Speed Garage


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #789 1/1/09 -
Post by: texasmom on January 03, 2009, 02:06:30 AM
More about Rene Van Nie's new books, I posted some info from his website about this last night.

http://www.amigoe.com/artman/publish/artikel_50955.php

Google translation:

New autobiographical book René van Nie
29 Dec, 2008, 14:22 (GMT -04:00)

  Email this article
  Print this article
 
ORANGE CITY - From Rene van Nie, a new book. He presents the autobiographical work entitled "Rene van Nie leaves the back of his tongue to see" on January 10 at Van Dorp bookstore in Dakota. The filmmaker and author of Nie (1939), the book that day eleven o'clock in the morning to one o'clock in the afternoon at his new book baptism. This occasion of his seventieth birthday he celebrated in 2009. The new work by Van Nie appears in a print run of only seventy-pieces equal in number as his years and is a collector item. That is an advertising at the entrance of the Van Dorp bookstore. When you buy the new book, customers also receive free short story Shoe, which is about the suspect in the Holloway case, Joran van der Sloot.  In this paper, a number of parts from the book published. Last Saturday, the first part "With the helmet on." Part two will appear next Saturday 'Gypsy Boy with street mart as luggage in Amigoe.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #789 1/1/09 -
Post by: texasmom on January 03, 2009, 02:27:06 AM
(http://i21.photobucket.com/albums/b258/texasmom55/Natalee66544.jpg)
JUSTICE FOR NATALEE!!!!


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #789 1/1/09 -
Post by: texasmom on January 03, 2009, 02:35:50 AM
Goodnight everyone!


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #789 1/1/09 -
Post by: Keepthefaith on January 03, 2009, 02:40:02 AM
Goodnight everyone!

Goodnight TM..We Pray for Justice For Natalee ::MonkeyDance::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #789 1/1/09 -
Post by: MuffyBee on January 03, 2009, 02:42:38 AM
Good night to all those headed for the monkey bunkey.

Thank you for posting the picture, Texasmom.  A reminder...

KTF ~  You sure are hanging in there  :salut:


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #789 1/1/09 -
Post by: Kermit on January 03, 2009, 03:55:36 AM

The footage WAS turned over to the FBI immediately. You do our FBI a disservice imho by thinking they walked away without it.  (not according to Kyles own words)

Jen also stated I believe, that they had compiled their findings, when Kyle came back he asked that they not post the piece they had put together because they had taken speculation and turned it into facts and had taken his words out of context. So why haven't the Freebirds published the material that Kermit brought here to SM? Why the need to leave the Freebirds to post the material? Am I wrong and the Freebirds are publishing their findings on the Persistence?
(could Kermit or another Freebird please address LDSTLOU's assertion)



My answers above in Red.  Sorry but I cannot answer for the Freebirds.



FEB:
Kyle: "I've talked with Peter Shouten numerous times back in February. He hasn't seen anything but knows about the blue fabrics. DeVries and Endemol was interested in purchasing the ROV footage and I was working between them, ABC, and CBS to strike a deal.

Kyle: "I should clarify that the footage proceeds (if sold) wouldn't even have covered the cost of the project, but it would have helped.


11 Feb 2008 - Kyle asks for donations for the Persistence to continue the search. They are out of funds.


Kyle: "Klye:  I did not give the information to the FBI and I'm unaware of anyone relaying the possibility to them.

February 27 there is a side sonar search of the pond. Kyle said it was to rule out one of the ponds that had never been searched
February 27 Caps uses a shango post to give the directions to the pond
FEBRUARY 29 LAWSUIT ANNOUNCED ON SCHAEFFER'S COMPANY BY A LAW FIRM IN LOUISIANA
http://au.us.biz.yahoo.com/iw/080229/0368776.html



MAR 1. The RV Persistence announced it was returning and needed funds
MARCH 1, 2008 - KYLE POSTS AT SM THEY FLY OUT OF ARUBA TOMORROW

Kyle: "Kyle: I couldn't get the logs from the Persistence. All things "Holloway" were stripped from the boat once it got back to Louisiana"

March 18th Kyle stated: "I did not give the information to the FBI and I'm unaware of anyone relaying the possibility to them. I"

March 20th Kyle stated: "I prefer moving forward with the evidence I have access and knowledge about and using that as a can opener. Once the can is open, the worms are revealed."



Kyle: The next step:
I will soon propose a meeting with Beth and other family members, myself, Tim Trahan, Peter DeVries, and whomever else necessary to go over the ROV video, contents, and case status. I would like a couple people very familiar with the case documents also present to help connect dots during the meeting. I would prefer meeting towards the end of April or mid-May to allow adequate time for things to shake themselves out if is going to. If necessary, I have an ABC (20/20) and CBS (early show) film crew ready and willing to take part in such a meeting should it require press coverage. I've already had a meeting with ABC about this and they are "definitely interested" at the executive level. We met in mid-Feb about this already. The question becomes timing, who needs to be there, and whether or not it's covered by the press. I prefer not, but it may be useful. DeVries doesn't need to be there in my opinion but he's good for ratings and helps ABC be cooperative if needed.

May 19, 2008: "KYLE: "I couldn't get the logs from the Persistence. All things "Holloway" were stripped from the boat once it got back to Louisiana. I had some stuff on my hard drive, but not those logs with the names. The logs and other information are in an unknown secure location. Only two people know that location and I am not one of them. I know better not even to ask about it, especially now."
 


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #789 1/1/09 -
Post by: Kermit on January 03, 2009, 03:58:03 AM
WHO WAS IN CHARGE ON THE PERSISTENCE DURING THE JAN. 7TH DIVE?
Kyle stated: "Remember it was Richardson who said to us that he personally handled the evidence and sent it immediately to our FBI)


QUESTION: "Kyle, do you think the video you have is very good at proving the denim and baggies? Also, is there confirmation that the FBI was sent anything?"

KYLE Answered: ""15:46 I get done in the survey room backing up the ROV dive and head to the back deck to talk to the Polis divers and see what they sampled and see the Polis boat way in the distance heading away fast. John doesn't seem concerned at all, but I am very dissapointed, concerned, and burning inside because I have a feeling that I/we will never know what they took from the trap.
That evening I talked to John asking when we plan on recovering the trap. Previously this was part of the talks and plan, but this time he doesn't seem concerned about ever looking into the trap further.

After John verbally BASHED me about the trap for what I said to Tim Miller about the sand body-form and that I believed her skirt was under the sand, John pretty much committed himself to the belief the trap wasn't what we were after. This shocked me because it was exactly what we were looking for- a fish trap lost at sea with human remains...hmm.


Kyle stated: "I have not given anything to the FBI since the pictures and statements from Dec 29th.







Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #789 1/1/09 -
Post by: Kermit on January 03, 2009, 03:58:50 AM
Kyle stated: " Louis DOES have legal rights to the footage regardless of Underwater Expeditions status. Louis personally signed the checks for the search."

Kyle stated: "Louis is currently working with someone who I do not know to put together some documentary on the case, the way it was handled, and what happened during the search. I learned this from Tim T. yesterday." Louis was sold on the idea that it will make him a lot of money.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #789 1/1/09 -
Post by: Kermit on January 03, 2009, 03:59:55 AM
In regards to Freebirds releasing the document:


Kyle stated: " think we should drop the bickering and focus our attention on getting Beth to approve the doc. Once the doc is out all of this becomes moot. "


Kyle stated: "We believe the trap footage may be the missing piece which will raise a BIG question in the minds of the public everywhere. We're in the process of figuring out how to produce and spin the story most accurately and most effectively."

Also, and completely independant and unrelated, John will be in Aruba tomorrow and will report soon. This is a different issue. He knows nothing of what we're about to do with the footage.



Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #789 1/1/09 -
Post by: Kermit on January 03, 2009, 04:02:03 AM
ACCORDING TO IDSTLOU Kyle said:
"This is completely incorrect. I had sent the FBI the dive screen shots the day each dive was made. Either John or Tim T. sent out the ROV videos at the first opportunity. This wasn't in my hands.  I think the Freebirds contacted Birmingham FBI and drew a blank.  I sent the screen shots to the senior agent in charge the day they were created, as instructed -Agent edited and edited (Barbados)."
http://scaredmonkeys.net/index.php?topic=4340.540



BUT THAT IS NOT WHAT KYLE SAID WHEN HE WAS PLANNING ON FREEBIRDS RELEASING THE DOCUMENT!

Kyle stated: "No one else has access or copies of the photos or footage. All fingers point back to me when this leaks."





Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #789 1/1/09 -
Post by: Kermit on January 03, 2009, 04:02:51 AM
edit above to say THE DOCUMENT not HE DOCUMENT.



Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #789 1/1/09 -
Post by: Kermit on January 03, 2009, 04:03:49 AM
jen3560
Re: Natalee Case Discussion #788 12/31/08 -
« Reply #54 on: December 31, 2008, 04:36:13 PM »

KeeptheFaith and Janet,

After we discovered this information had been withheld from US authorities, we contacted legal counsel, and were advised to keep our distance from Persistence crew members and benefactors - that is when and why Kyle was banned.
That occurred the end of September.
http://scaredmonkeys.net/index.php?topic=4328.msg605250#msg605250



Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #789 1/1/09 -
Post by: Kermit on January 03, 2009, 04:04:26 AM
Kyle: "I should clarify that the footage proceeds (if sold) wouldn't even have covered the cost of the project, but it would have helped.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #789 1/1/09 -
Post by: Kermit on January 03, 2009, 04:05:03 AM
"Klye:  I did not give the information to the FBI and I'm unaware of anyone relaying the possibility to them.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #789 1/1/09 -
Post by: Kermit on January 03, 2009, 04:05:43 AM
March 20th Kyle stated: "I prefer moving forward with the evidence I have access and knowledge about and using that as a can opener. Once the can is open, the worms are revealed."



Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #789 1/1/09 -
Post by: Kermit on January 03, 2009, 04:06:46 AM
Kyle stated: "I have not given anything to the FBI since the pictures and statements from Dec 29th.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #789 1/1/09 -
Post by: Kermit on January 03, 2009, 04:07:46 AM
Kyle stated: "We believe the trap footage may be the missing piece which will raise a BIG question in the minds of the public everywhere. We're in the process of figuring out how to produce and spin the story most accurately and most effectively."
Also, and completely independant and unrelated, John will be in Aruba tomorrow and will report soon. This is a different issue. He knows nothing of what we're about to do with the footage.



Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #789 1/1/09 -
Post by: Kermit on January 03, 2009, 04:08:07 AM

Kyle stated: "No one else has access or copies of the photos or footage. All fingers point back to me when this leaks."


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #789 1/1/09 -
Post by: Kermit on January 03, 2009, 04:09:28 AM
ribbit


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #789 1/1/09 -
Post by: Kermit on January 03, 2009, 04:13:53 AM
Kyle said: "Right before the Dateline special aired Tim and Louis asked if I could go to ABC to try to sell the footage in an attempt to recoup some of the money invested in the search efforts. ABC was very interested, but decided to wait until the Dateline special aired. After the show they came back to me and declined to purchase it because they felt too much of the story was already told by Dateline. That ended any communication with ABC. About 6 executive producers saw the footage, but none were allowed copies or any pictures. Everything remained in my possesion.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #789 1/1/09 -
Post by: Kermit on January 03, 2009, 04:17:06 AM
Good night monkeys, the pond awaits me tired frog legs.

I hope the posts help to clear up anything that may not be very clear up till now.

Thank you for your support Monkeys.
Thank you for the kind words.
Thank you for making me laugh when I wanted to .....well you know.

And thank you Patriot for your kind words, it touched my heart. It really did, in ways you don't know.
I've done a lot for our country, fighting the bad guys and exposing the truth you are the first person who said that to me. Means a lot. Thank you very much.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #789 1/1/09 -
Post by: caesu on January 03, 2009, 07:28:57 AM
Quote
PVV Brinkman voices criticism on Holloway-case

THE HAGUE - The Holloway case is badly investigated is the opinion of PVV-Member of Parliament Hero Brinkman. During the visit of a parliamentary delegation he jumps into the case, but he is also critical on the new governing board structure on the Antilles.

Member of Parliament Hero Brinkman of the PVV the coming week on Aruba jumps into the Natalee Holloway case. During the visit of a parliamentary delegation to the Antilles he speaks the lawyer of the disappeared American teenager, several policemen and some former members of the Public Prosecution Service. "The investigation is as bad as it can be".

What can you do what Peter R. de Vries can't?

"I want prevent that the case gets covered-up. Because that's about to happen now. Peter R. de Vries has filled me in I have just about read everything concerning the case, so that I have been well prepared. And I have agreed that I tell him everything I what I get to know.''

What do think you will discover there?

"The Aruban minister of justice Rudy Croes is indeed corrupt, but in this case he speaks truth according to me. Croes has suggested that the father of Joran van der Sloot were very good friends with the police force chef on Aruba. That police force chef will have said that he could not apprehend the son of his best friend. That explains why the investigation came just after ten days on pace, while already four hours after the disappearance of Natalee already it was clear that Joran was closely involved."

http://www.nd.nl/artikelen/2009/januari/02/pvv-er-brinkman-uit-zijn-kritiek-op-zaak-holloway


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #789 1/1/09 -
Post by: Nut44x4 on January 03, 2009, 08:02:34 AM
It is now 2009 and I thank all of you for allowing me to be a part of the Monkey cage. Since Red has said that things WILL be happening, I ask all of you to just have patience and then we will have answers. We are here because we all care about Natalee and her family. Many of the recent posts are very confusing but I still have faith that justice will be won. We all must keep asking questions and searching for the truth.

God Bless all of you for caring.
Cajun Miracle

Good post!!  :thumleft:


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #789 1/1/09 -
Post by: bastibro on January 03, 2009, 08:02:49 AM
Quote
PVV Brinkman voices criticism on Holloway-case

THE HAGUE - The Holloway case is badly investigated is the opinion of PVV-Member of Parliament Hero Brinkman. During the visit of a parliamentary delegation he jumps into the case, but he is also critical on the new governing board structure on the Antilles.

Member of Parliament Hero Brinkman of the PVV the coming week on Aruba jumps into the Natalee Holloway case. During the visit of a parliamentary delegation to the Antilles he speaks the lawyer of the disappeared American teenager, several policemen and some former members of the Public Prosecution Service. "The investigation is as bad as it can be".

What can you do what Peter R. de Vries can't?

"I want prevent that the case gets covered-up. Because that's about to happen now. Peter R. de Vries has filled me in I have just about read everything concerning the case, so that I have been well prepared. And I have agreed that I tell him everything I what I get to know.''

What do think you will discover there?

"The Aruban minister of justice Rudy Croes is indeed corrupt, but in this case he speaks truth according to me. Croes has suggested that the father of Joran van der Sloot were very good friends with the police force chef on Aruba. That police force chef will have said that he could not apprehend the son of his best friend. That explains why the investigation came just after ten days on pace, while already four hours after the disappearance of Natalee already it was clear that Joran was closely involved."

http://www.nd.nl/artikelen/2009/januari/02/pvv-er-brinkman-uit-zijn-kritiek-op-zaak-holloway

Good translation Caesu ::MonkeyWink::

(http://www.nd.nl/images/library/pictures/1c/73/3b/f7/2_b5e87b7a3d6f4a3ae7aaff816a36b8ee18af7f31.jpg)


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #789 1/1/09 -
Post by: Ree on January 03, 2009, 08:25:45 AM
Folks, I left early last night, but catching up gives me reason to be a little suspicious this morning.  We got somewhat good news from CAPS, Kermie and Red.  Then an interesting discussion begins about Columbian connections and following the money.  In the middle of that LDStLou shows up again to defend Kyle some more the the topic of discussion is completely forgotten. ::MonkeyConfused::

Thanks to Kermit for coming back and backing up everything that was said concerning Kyle.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #789 1/1/09 -
Post by: Buckeye on January 03, 2009, 09:01:57 AM
Been reading around today.  Interesting post on a Dutch psychic site.  Don't think it's related to RG but maybe johan can tell us.  They seem to throw Guido under the bus.

Translated from google:

The case of Natalee is long. There is much information about its course, because many have been working on it. And thus Sapaho but also with a surprising twist! Read on.

Natalee disappeared in the night of 29 on May 30, 2005 during a vacation in Aruba without trace after a night steps. Deepak, Satish and Joran would be the last to have seen her that night.

What happened to her?

21.30 Natalee Joran met for the second time but now the blackjack tables of the casino in the Holiday Inn. Since they play in the company of Guido Wever, who works as a croupier.
It is cozy and Guido giant bi-sexual who believe Natalee is nice but it has targeted at Joran.
After a while talking Joran and Guido what Joran and agree that it would arrange for him.
22.40 am Joran leave the casino and go to McDonald's which is located 400 meters away. Natalee asked Guido where Joran and it refers to its Carlo, and Charlie's in Oranjestad.
In calling his father, who collect him. They drive home the next day because Joran had to get up early to go to school. After an hour because he thinks Joran is a friend of Natalee was very nice and is also the appointment of Guido.
He calls with Deepak Kalpoe and agree that this, together with his brother Satish retrieve him.
00.15 hours a Honda Civic stopped at the door and Joran get in on the brothers. They drive to Charlie's where the ladies are.

01.10 pm The bar is closed and Joran and the brothers make preparation to leave. Also Natalee and her friends go out. Joran asks who wants to get to a beach and Natalee has ears to it. Furthermore, no one wants them so the brothers, Natalee and Joran leave.
Joran that Guido has agreed on the beach asked the brothers to sell him to the beach. Just past the Fisherman, s huts is an exit to the beach.
Since steps Joran and Natalee off. The brothers say goodbye and go home.

01.19 hours as they walk along the water and talk about everything. They are looking for a place to sit and start a little love. This is flat along the way, here are shrubs. There is what Joran gerommeld but has no condom with him and sought other ways.
Guido appears 01.50 hours on the beach and talk what Natalee and Joran. Guido is sitting next to Natalee and attempts by her. They will not try and escape. She calls that Joran meanwhile ran away but this is just

Guido who had been press-up with his tour Joran asked whether he has a condom. Joran says Natalee not Guido tries to rape. This does not really because Natalee is fierce resistance and begins to cry. Guido expressed his left upper arm to the throat of Natalee to her under restraint and raped her. She scratches and bite him in his arm, but because they could get no air, they ran away. She began to have seizures and Guido scared of this and immediately called Joran. When they arrived, they appeared to be deceased. The two boys got in panic and began to accuse each other.
02.26 am Joran Deepak to call him soon to tell what happened and asked him or his father Paul v / d Sloot to the Fisherman, s huts would send.

Because Joran knew his father was calling him all slept not an option.
02.46 am Joran Deepak sends an SMS with the message "Wait until you are at home, miss call me"
So call him back with no text but just 1 time to proceed so that's no recognition of the name of Joran will appear. This was also the message that Deepak Joran father had woken up.
02.55 hours Paul arrived at his place on the road.

Joran is already there and Guido almost. This has Natalee on his back and as dragging to the hut. En route, he lost a shoe but could not attract more. This is because he had Natalee back down and he was too tired for. He also says that Joran against his shoe still on the beach. Joran said: "If they find him, I say that he is mine. They know that I was on the beach and you will not, no one has seen you. "

So far Part 1 of Natalee, the issue of Sapaho.

Source: Sapaho

http://paranormaal.blog.nl/dossier/2009/01/02/dossier-sapaho-natalee-holloway-deel-1


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #789 1/1/09 -
Post by: jen3560 on January 03, 2009, 09:51:38 AM
LDSTLOU - if Joran van der Sloot emailed me and confessed to Natalee dying and his disposing of her body, would it bother you if I posted the jest of that email in the forum?  Just so people could have a good idea what was sent to me?  Or would you think it more important to honor a private email and not tell anyone about it?

I don't see that Caps was posting any confession. Kermit says she is not allowed to post it and yet she posts it. And no, if I had an e-mail from Joran confessing I would not post it at SM, I would turn it over to the FBI who I am sure would tell me to keep my mouth shut about it and I would keep my mouth shut about it.

Which Kyle DID NOT do.  He posted on a private forum his concerns instead of giving the information to the FBI.

that is not true. All footage was turned over to the FBI. Do you wonder why JQK, Tim Miller, Dateline the FBI and the Family are not speaking out about the Persistence? Could it be because it was all done on the up and up? Kyle also asked that his posts not be made public. I believe Jen's letter said they sought legal advice and were told not to publish his posts...am I wrong?

Yes, I believe you are WRONG:

1.  From Kermit's and Kyle's posts the information was turned over to the FBI and JQK because neither Kyle or John Silvetti did.

2.  I believe Jen stated they were told to stay away from Kyle, nothing about NOT publishing his posts.  I think it was Kyle that threatened people if they published them.

The footage WAS turned over to the FBI immediately. You do our FBI a disservice imho by thinking they walked away without it.

Jen also stated I believe, that they had compiled their findings, when Kyle came back he asked that they not post the piece they had put together because they had taken speculation and turned it into facts and had taken his words out of context. So why haven't the Freebirds published the material that Kermit brought here to SM? Why the need to leave the Freebirds to post the material? Am I wrong and the Freebirds are publishing their findings on the Persistence?




Oh good lord. The FBI never "walked away" with anything - they weren't ever there!

And  no - there was no speculation turned into fact.  Kyle said we couldn't publish his "intellectual property" without fear of reprisal.

You really don't get it, do you?

Would you put others at potential legal risk to publish something?  Or would you resign from the group first to protect it from such?

Please - do us all, yourself included, a favor - READ THINGS BEFORE YOU SPOUT OFF INCORRECT INFORMATION.  You are just making matters worse by not doing so.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #789 1/1/09 -
Post by: jen3560 on January 03, 2009, 09:56:41 AM

Define immediately.  When was the footage/pictures turned over.  Do you know this answer.  Can you provide a factual date.

I don't want to hear Kyle said immediately.  I want a date.


the day they were created!!!!


The pics from January 7th ldstlou - not December 30.




Hotshot answered this one a few times i think. These were not Kyle's responsibility to turn over. They were turned over by either John or Tim. Kyle can't say for sure because he was not  there when they were turned over. Any date he gave would be pure speculation.  This does NOT imply a conspiracy, nor that they were not turned over timely, it only says that it wasn't Kyle's responsibility at the time and he was not the one who turned over the footage...but it was turned over.

there are two separate issues here, screen shots and the actual footage. Sceen shots were sent daily as intructed by the FBI agents in charge, and the footage was turned over at the first opportunity.

Now you are just out and out lying.  There was no "FBI agent in charge".

Kyle emailed images from the Dec 29th dive to the FBI.  That was all.  Nothing more.  Ever.  As of Dec 30th, John had completely dismissed the trap, believed the Aruban's at their word that it wasn't case related - and certainly then did NOT send anything to the FBI himself.  ::MonkeyNoNo::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #789 1/1/09 -
Post by: jen3560 on January 03, 2009, 10:04:43 AM
I am going to venture into this little thing here.  (gosh, I hope I don't regret it)

What I understand ldstlou to be saying here is that there was a protocol on the ship where things were turned over to the FBI as they were developed and Kyle was not the one on the ship that was assigned to do that.

Am I right, ldstlou?

that is my understanding

So what you are saying is that the FBI was there on the ship the entire time including January 7th and they saw the pictures.

So if they saw these pictures what is the big deal.

Is it because Kyle released information he should not have.

I am not sure what you are asking me? What is the big deal to me?
Surely you aren't trying to tell us the FBI was physically aboard the Persistence on Dec. 29th to Jan 7th?!?

I didn't ask that question so I don't know if they were on board or not. I know that there were members of Quantico on board.

Wow!! You're just digging yourself deeper into these lies, aren't you?

You really might want to check that again - I have an email from Kyle that there was NO FBI INVOLVEMENT.  At all.  None.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #789 1/1/09 -
Post by: jen3560 on January 03, 2009, 10:06:36 AM
LDSTLOU,
Again, I think you have failed to follow EVERY detail and words of Kyle himself. Kyle has stated that John S. had NO interest in the trap -- in fact he told Kyle "to never bring up the trap" again! Kyle told Freebirds that John S. has NEW business dealings in Aruba. Beth's brother (private eye) was flabbergasted to find out about the Jan. 7th pics in MARCH! That is NOT IMMEDIATELY. Kyle had no responsibilty to turn over ALL pics????? Well, he sure had responsibility to SELL the pics in February!

John did not believe Natalee was in that trap. They had other targets they had located and he wanted to focus on the other targets that were possibilites. Remember, they identified quite a few other possible targets that they were eager to look into. It wasn't because he was hiding anything in the trap, he felt they had eliminated the possibility that it was Natalee and wanet to get to other possibilities.

Eager to look into, so eager they begged for donations one day while they were packing to leave at the same time. 

So eager to look into...................eager to follow Richardson's instructions - go out into deeper water, away from the trap.  Yeah - that's the ticket!

Meanwhile - Dutch/Aruban coast guard is at the trap site two days in a row - for a good amount of time.

Coincidence?  ::MonkeyWink::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #789 1/1/09 -
Post by: Blue Moon on January 03, 2009, 10:09:34 AM
Quote
PVV Brinkman voices criticism on Holloway-case

THE HAGUE - The Holloway case is badly investigated is the opinion of PVV-Member of Parliament Hero Brinkman. During the visit of a parliamentary delegation he jumps into the case, but he is also critical on the new governing board structure on the Antilles.

Member of Parliament Hero Brinkman of the PVV the coming week on Aruba jumps into the Natalee Holloway case. During the visit of a parliamentary delegation to the Antilles he speaks the lawyer of the disappeared American teenager, several policemen and some former members of the Public Prosecution Service. "The investigation is as bad as it can be".

What can you do what Peter R. de Vries can't?

"I want prevent that the case gets covered-up. Because that's about to happen now. Peter R. de Vries has filled me in I have just about read everything concerning the case, so that I have been well prepared. And I have agreed that I tell him everything I what I get to know.''

What do think you will discover there?

"The Aruban minister of justice Rudy Croes is indeed corrupt, but in this case he speaks truth according to me. Croes has suggested that the father of Joran van der Sloot were very good friends with the police force chef on Aruba. That police force chef will have said that he could not apprehend the son of his best friend. That explains why the investigation came just after ten days on pace, while already four hours after the disappearance of Natalee already it was clear that Joran was closely involved."

http://www.nd.nl/artikelen/2009/januari/02/pvv-er-brinkman-uit-zijn-kritiek-op-zaak-holloway
thanks Caesu, this answers what Hero is going to do and how well he has checked into this case.  Encouraging.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #789 1/1/09 -
Post by: jen3560 on January 03, 2009, 10:14:06 AM
Quantico is a Marine Corp Base that houses among other things the FBI academy.

So were these agents onboard from the regular FBI which is in Washington, DC, or from Bardados?  There are some lab facilities at Quantico but the forensic samples in the plastic bags were only in the ALE dive boat was my understanding from Kyle's posts.

Just following along, here, Anna....my thoughts were along the same lines.

Someone from Quantico could be a Marine, lol. 


Marine Corps Base Quantico
It's called the "Crossroads of the Marine Corps," and during its 80 year tenure on the approximately 100 square miles of land located along the western bank of the Potomac River, Marine Corps Base Quantico has been a training site for Marines and a birthing place of Marine Corps concepts.

The Marine Corps Base provides functional support for the overall Quantico mission including the provision of personnel administration, facilities, logistics, financial security, safety, public information, legal, base operations, training, administration, morale, welfare and recreation support for organic and tenant organizations.


Didn't Dompig train at Quantico?? Maybe HE was on board the Persistence!

 ::MonkeyHaHa:: ::MonkeyHaHa::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #789 1/1/09 -
Post by: jen3560 on January 03, 2009, 10:16:05 AM
I think we need Kermit, Jen, or wingnut to come back and re-state the timelines as they know it.

I think we need Tim Miller to explain it to us.
Tim Miller was not on the persistence when the ROV video was taken on jan 7...John S. put him off the ship on Dec 30th....

No but I am sure Tim could answer if the FBI were involved. I am sure he could answer what the protocol was in turning over footage. I am sure he could answer if he was removed from the Persistence. I am sure he could answer if he felt John Silvetti was involved in a cover-up with the FBI. I think those answers would go a long way right now.


Ldstlou, you have convinced me.  Your explanations sound straightforward and credible. 

 ::MonkeyHaHa:: ::MonkeyCool::  How are her explanations any more credible than any one elses?  Because she spoke with Kyle or Jug?

Just my opinion.  I'm not basing it on who she got the info from, just that the info seems to make sense.  I'm just not buying the conspiracy theories about the Persistence crew.  The Freebirds believed everything Kyle said and based their theories on his words, and if Kyle mislead them, the conclusions they drew cannot be correct.
So why would Kyle "mislead" Freebirds?   ::MonkeyConfused:: ::MonkeyNoNo:: ::MonkeyConfused:: ::MonkeyRoll:: ::MonkeyConfused::

Especially when he knew a family member was there at our board.............


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #789 1/1/09 -
Post by: wreck on January 03, 2009, 10:16:16 AM
Thanks jen, it was like talking to a brick wall last night. All we ever asked her to do was to read EVERYTHING posted.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #789 1/1/09 -
Post by: RoxiBalboa on January 03, 2009, 10:16:41 AM
Morning Monkeys

When a two year old throws themselves in the floor, kicking and screaming, they want everyone in the rooms eyes on them. All attention on them. The best way to handle this fit throwing child is to turn your back and go on about your business. Eventually the two year old will realize that the fit isn't working and go about his business.

Don't let the 2 year old fit thrower distract you, turn your backs and go about your busniess.

I'm on page 20 right now, but replying as thoughts come to me

Question for those who doubt the Mansurs. I have a hard time doubting Jossy because he has done so much to try to help the Holloway's and printed many articles that went against Aruba(n government). For the Mansur doubters, do you think he was always to be mistrusted or something happened to change his believability?

Ignore button: You all have them, utilize them. (see: 2 yr old tantrum) Punch that imaginary cyber ignore button and move on with your wonderful work toward bringing Natalee home

Red, thanks for the hope. That is what is needed right now, Hope for Monkeys, and Hope for Natalee!



Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #789 1/1/09 -
Post by: Blue Moon on January 03, 2009, 10:20:25 AM
Jen and Kermit, thanks for calling out these truthless statements.  It is really frustrating trying to get them to read what is posted here and understand that it is Kyle's words.  Guess we need to ignore and move on cause I don't think we will change their mind.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #789 1/1/09 -
Post by: RoxiBalboa on January 03, 2009, 10:21:30 AM
Amigoe has an article about Brinkman but you have to be a subsriber to read it


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #789 1/1/09 -
Post by: jen3560 on January 03, 2009, 10:26:56 AM
Morning Monkeys!

Have we seen anything more from Greta to tell us whether or not she's headed to Aruba with JQK?


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #789 1/1/09 -
Post by: blah on January 03, 2009, 10:32:37 AM
Quantico is a Marine Corp Base that houses among other things the FBI academy.

So were these agents onboard from the regular FBI which is in Washington, DC, or from Bardados?  There are some lab facilities at Quantico but the forensic samples in the plastic bags were only in the ALE dive boat was my understanding from Kyle's posts.

Just following along, here, Anna....my thoughts were along the same lines.

Someone from Quantico could be a Marine, lol. 


Marine Corps Base Quantico
It's called the "Crossroads of the Marine Corps," and during its 80 year tenure on the approximately 100 square miles of land located along the western bank of the Potomac River, Marine Corps Base Quantico has been a training site for Marines and a birthing place of Marine Corps concepts.

The Marine Corps Base provides functional support for the overall Quantico mission including the provision of personnel administration, facilities, logistics, financial security, safety, public information, legal, base operations, training, administration, morale, welfare and recreation support for organic and tenant organizations.


Didn't Dompig train at Quantico?? Maybe HE was on board the Persistence!

 ::MonkeyHaHa:: ::MonkeyHaHa::

I believe Dompig got his training at Dunkin Donuts but I could be wrong


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #789 1/1/09 -
Post by: nimrod on January 03, 2009, 10:33:33 AM
I liked Nixon.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #789 1/1/09 -
Post by: hotping on January 03, 2009, 10:35:15 AM
Quantico is a Marine Corp Base that houses among other things the FBI academy.

So were these agents onboard from the regular FBI which is in Washington, DC, or from Bardados?  There are some lab facilities at Quantico but the forensic samples in the plastic bags were only in the ALE dive boat was my understanding from Kyle's posts.

Just following along, here, Anna....my thoughts were along the same lines.

Someone from Quantico could be a Marine, lol. 


Marine Corps Base Quantico
It's called the "Crossroads of the Marine Corps," and during its 80 year tenure on the approximately 100 square miles of land located along the western bank of the Potomac River, Marine Corps Base Quantico has been a training site for Marines and a birthing place of Marine Corps concepts.

The Marine Corps Base provides functional support for the overall Quantico mission including the provision of personnel administration, facilities, logistics, financial security, safety, public information, legal, base operations, training, administration, morale, welfare and recreation support for organic and tenant organizations.


Didn't Dompig train at Quantico?? Maybe HE was on board the Persistence!

 ::MonkeyHaHa:: ::MonkeyHaHa::

I believe Dompig got his training at Dunkin Donuts but I could be wrong
I believe You're Absolutely Correct!  ::MonkeyWink:: ::MonkeyHaHa::

Good Morning Monkeys!  ::MonkeyCool::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #789 1/1/09 -
Post by: wreck on January 03, 2009, 10:35:45 AM
Morning Monkeys

When a two year old throws themselves in the floor, kicking and screaming, they want everyone in the rooms eyes on them. All attention on them. The best way to handle this fit throwing child is to turn your back and go on about your business. Eventually the two year old will realize that the fit isn't working and go about his business.

Don't let the 2 year old fit thrower distract you, turn your backs and go about your busniess.

I'm on page 20 right now, but replying as thoughts come to me

Question for those who doubt the Mansurs. I have a hard time doubting Jossy because he has done so much to try to help the Holloway's and printed many articles that went against Aruba(n government). For the Mansur doubters, do you think he was always to be mistrusted or something happened to change his believability?

Ignore button: You all have them, utilize them. (see: 2 yr old tantrum) Punch that imaginary cyber ignore button and move on with your wonderful work toward bringing Natalee home

Red, thanks for the hope. That is what is needed right now, Hope for Monkeys, and Hope for Natalee!


Jossy is an enigma. He has ALWAYS published articles against the current government (before and after Natalee). That is HIS motivation. Whether he is simply "duped" now or complicit in cover-up remains to be seen. -JMO


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #789 1/1/09 -
Post by: hotping on January 03, 2009, 10:40:58 AM
Morning Monkeys!

Have we seen anything more from Greta to tell us whether or not she's headed to Aruba with JQK?
I checked Greta Wire and did not see anything about Aruba or where She is headed...


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #789 1/1/09 -
Post by: jen3560 on January 03, 2009, 10:41:22 AM
Jen and Kermit, thanks for calling out these truthless statements.  It is really frustrating trying to get them to read what is posted here and understand that it is Kyle's words.  Guess we need to ignore and move on cause I don't think we will change their mind.

You are right!

And Roxi put it so well!

I just wish they would use they intelligence I know they were blessed with.

They could ask themselves three simple questions - and realize they were being lied to.

If the FBI had really been apprised up to and including the Jan 7 dive - why in God's name would they have withheld all of this information from Natalee's family?

And why in the hell would the FBI have let Aruba drive off with this evidence - and not been there to "observe" the handling of it?

Why would Richardson have had to send it to them?  Rather than give it to them, since "Quantico" were supposedly on board?



Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #789 1/1/09 -
Post by: jen3560 on January 03, 2009, 10:42:56 AM
Jen and Kermit, thanks for calling out these truthless statements.  It is really frustrating trying to get them to read what is posted here and understand that it is Kyle's words.  Guess we need to ignore and move on cause I don't think we will change their mind.

You are right!

And Roxi put it so well!

I just wish they would use they intelligence I know they were blessed with.

They could ask themselves three simple questions - and realize they were being lied to.

If the FBI had really been apprised up to and including the Jan 7 dive - why in God's name would they have withheld all of this information from Natalee's family?

And why in the hell would the FBI have let Aruba drive off with this evidence - and not been there to "observe" the handling of it?

Why would Richardson have had to send it to them?  Rather than give it to them, since "Quantico" were supposedly on board?



Whoops - need to add one more here.

Why, if the FBI had been receiving daily information (reports and screen shots), did they not throw an absolute fit over having only received one item for testing?  When the images very clearly show several items were bagged from inside that trap?


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #789 1/1/09 -
Post by: jen3560 on January 03, 2009, 10:43:28 AM
Morning Monkeys!

Have we seen anything more from Greta to tell us whether or not she's headed to Aruba with JQK?
I checked Greta Wire and did not see anything about Aruba or where She is headed...

Thanks hotping!


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #789 1/1/09 -
Post by: wreck on January 03, 2009, 10:44:02 AM
Morning Monkeys

When a two year old throws themselves in the floor, kicking and screaming, they want everyone in the rooms eyes on them. All attention on them. The best way to handle this fit throwing child is to turn your back and go on about your business. Eventually the two year old will realize that the fit isn't working and go about his business.

Don't let the 2 year old fit thrower distract you, turn your backs and go about your busniess.

I'm on page 20 right now, but replying as thoughts come to me

Question for those who doubt the Mansurs. I have a hard time doubting Jossy because he has done so much to try to help the Holloway's and printed many articles that went against Aruba(n government). For the Mansur doubters, do you think he was always to be mistrusted or something happened to change his believability?

Ignore button: You all have them, utilize them. (see: 2 yr old tantrum) Punch that imaginary cyber ignore button and move on with your wonderful work toward bringing Natalee home

Red, thanks for the hope. That is what is needed right now, Hope for Monkeys, and Hope for Natalee!


Jossy is an enigma. He has ALWAYS published articles against the current government (before and after Natalee). That is HIS motivation. Whether he is simply "duped" now or complicit in cover-up remains to be seen. -JMO
I'm still troubled by the whole "shoe" thing. Diario found this "shoe" by the lighthouse and published pictures. Next thing you know, this shoe was supposedly found in the pond and Jossy was going to publish a 4 part series about it (according to Caps)! It never materialized (like most everything else).


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #789 1/1/09 -
Post by: hotping on January 03, 2009, 10:50:12 AM
Morning Monkeys!

Have we seen anything more from Greta to tell us whether or not she's headed to Aruba with JQK?
I checked Greta Wire and did not see anything about Aruba or where She is headed...

Thanks hotping!
You're Welcome....I should be Thanking You.. for clarifying some of the BS from last night so Thank You!  ::MonkeyCool::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #789 1/1/09 -
Post by: Blue Moon on January 03, 2009, 10:51:23 AM
Morning Monkeys

When a two year old throws themselves in the floor, kicking and screaming, they want everyone in the rooms eyes on them. All attention on them. The best way to handle this fit throwing child is to turn your back and go on about your business. Eventually the two year old will realize that the fit isn't working and go about his business.

Don't let the 2 year old fit thrower distract you, turn your backs and go about your busniess.

I'm on page 20 right now, but replying as thoughts come to me

Question for those who doubt the Mansurs. I have a hard time doubting Jossy because he has done so much to try to help the Holloway's and printed many articles that went against Aruba(n government). For the Mansur doubters, do you think he was always to be mistrusted or something happened to change his believability?

Ignore button: You all have them, utilize them. (see: 2 yr old tantrum) Punch that imaginary cyber ignore button and move on with your wonderful work toward bringing Natalee home

Red, thanks for the hope. That is what is needed right now, Hope for Monkeys, and Hope for Natalee!



I am one who does doubt Jossy.  I am basing this on his working with Caps and at this point I don't know what Caps role along with Jossy is concerning the pond searches/witnesses.  I asked Kermit the following question and she did not dismiss my concerns so I still don't know exactly where I stand concerning Jossy.  If anything I am feeling Jossy is in it more from a political standpoint no part of the coverup:

76       Natalee Holloway / Natalee Holloway / Re: Natalee Case Discussion #788 12/31/08 -       on: January 01, 2009, 02:18:58 PM
Quote from: Blue Moon of KY on January 01, 2009, 02:18:13 PM
Kermit, has Jossy inserted himself in all this innocently or on purpose?


Kermits response was:
Still to be determined.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #789 1/1/09 -
Post by: Anna on January 03, 2009, 10:54:53 AM
Quantico is a Marine Corp Base that houses among other things the FBI academy.

So were these agents onboard from the regular FBI which is in Washington, DC, or from Bardados?  There are some lab facilities at Quantico but the forensic samples in the plastic bags were only in the ALE dive boat was my understanding from Kyle's posts.

Just following along, here, Anna....my thoughts were along the same lines.

Someone from Quantico could be a Marine, lol. 


Marine Corps Base Quantico
It's called the "Crossroads of the Marine Corps," and during its 80 year tenure on the approximately 100 square miles of land located along the western bank of the Potomac River, Marine Corps Base Quantico has been a training site for Marines and a birthing place of Marine Corps concepts.

The Marine Corps Base provides functional support for the overall Quantico mission including the provision of personnel administration, facilities, logistics, financial security, safety, public information, legal, base operations, training, administration, morale, welfare and recreation support for organic and tenant organizations.


Didn't Dompig train at Quantico?? Maybe HE was on board the Persistence!

 ::MonkeyHaHa:: ::MonkeyHaHa::

I believe Dompig got his training at Dunkin Donuts but I could be wrong


Good Morning, Blah and All Monkeys,

Yes, I believe that is one course both Dompig and Dennis Jacobs completed.  There must be no fitness requirement for ALE at all.
But then it's not as though they actually ever pursue criminals so guess it doesn't matter if the deal is to avoid prosecution and conviction for much of anything.

.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #789 1/1/09 -
Post by: caesu on January 03, 2009, 10:57:06 AM
Amigoe has an article about Brinkman but you have to be a subsriber to read it

http://www.amigoe.com/artman/publish/printer_51091.php

http://scaredmonkeys.net/index.php?topic=4340.msg609059#msg609059


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #789 1/1/09 -
Post by: Anna on January 03, 2009, 10:59:15 AM
I see we had a very busy frog in here last night.  While I had read the posts before, some how this made it crystal clear.

Good job, Kermit.  And jen as well.

Should anyone bother to read the separate posts, there can be no doubt as to the fact much was amiss in the handling of not only the tapes but the actual evidence in the baggies.



Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #789 1/1/09 -
Post by: blah on January 03, 2009, 11:02:37 AM
Quantico is a Marine Corp Base that houses among other things the FBI academy.

So were these agents onboard from the regular FBI which is in Washington, DC, or from Bardados?  There are some lab facilities at Quantico but the forensic samples in the plastic bags were only in the ALE dive boat was my understanding from Kyle's posts.

Just following along, here, Anna....my thoughts were along the same lines.

Someone from Quantico could be a Marine, lol. 


Marine Corps Base Quantico
It's called the "Crossroads of the Marine Corps," and during its 80 year tenure on the approximately 100 square miles of land located along the western bank of the Potomac River, Marine Corps Base Quantico has been a training site for Marines and a birthing place of Marine Corps concepts.

The Marine Corps Base provides functional support for the overall Quantico mission including the provision of personnel administration, facilities, logistics, financial security, safety, public information, legal, base operations, training, administration, morale, welfare and recreation support for organic and tenant organizations.


Didn't Dompig train at Quantico?? Maybe HE was on board the Persistence!

 ::MonkeyHaHa:: ::MonkeyHaHa::

I believe Dompig got his training at Dunkin Donuts but I could be wrong


Good Morning, Blah and All Monkeys,

Yes, I believe that is one course both Dompig and Dennis Jacobs completed.  There must be no fitness requirement for ALE at all.
But then it's not as though they actually ever pursue criminals so guess it doesn't matter if the deal is to avoid prosecution and conviction for much of anything.

.


I think Jacobs invented DUnkin Donuts  ::MonkeyEek::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #789 1/1/09 -
Post by: Anna on January 03, 2009, 11:06:24 AM
Imagine what a franchise for Krispy Kremes could get there from just the cops and former cops alone!  A fortune for sure!



Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #789 1/1/09 -
Post by: Buckeye on January 03, 2009, 11:07:27 AM
Amigoe has an article about Brinkman but you have to be a subsriber to read it

If you change the word artikel (in the url) to printer, you will be able to open the subscription articles.

http://www.amigoe.com/artman/publish/printer_51091.php


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #789 1/1/09 -
Post by: texasmom on January 03, 2009, 11:09:18 AM
Amigoe has an article about Brinkman but you have to be a subsriber to read it

If you change the word artikel (in the url) to printer, you will be able to open the subscription articles.

http://www.amigoe.com/artman/publish/printer_51091.php

Thanks Buckeye, I've been changing the wrong word!!!!   ::MonkeyWink::  ::MonkeyHaHa::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #789 1/1/09 -
Post by: Buckeye on January 03, 2009, 11:11:26 AM
Amigoe has an article about Brinkman but you have to be a subsriber to read it

If you change the word artikel (in the url) to printer, you will be able to open the subscription articles.

http://www.amigoe.com/artman/publish/printer_51091.php


All the credit, for this, goes to caesu.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #789 1/1/09 -
Post by: RoxiBalboa on January 03, 2009, 11:14:48 AM
thanks ceasu and Buckeye
thanks for your thought Blue Moon


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #789 1/1/09 -
Post by: KYcat on January 03, 2009, 11:15:32 AM
Good Morning Monks and Monkettes!  I have a coffee in each hand this morning, I'm going to need it today.

Just want to thank Kermit and Jen for their posts this morning since the fiasco last night.  I am afraid that lisa will continue to believe what she wants to believe.  The key here is that she WANTS to believe what she is being fed.  It's that simple.

Not going back there again!  Well, off to do some work today.  But I will BBL.

Kermit, just want to say, sorry for not offering my appreciation for what all you have done for our country.  Kudos to Patriot for doing so.  I think the buzz in the cage overwhelms us most of the time and we forget some other really important things. 

I come from a long line of military with a deep love of this country so a great big THANK YOU. GOD BLESS. 

  :salut:

 





Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #789 1/1/09 -
Post by: klaasend on January 03, 2009, 11:25:22 AM
Amigoe has an article about Brinkman but you have to be a subsriber to read it

If you change the word artikel (in the url) to printer, you will be able to open the subscription articles.

http://www.amigoe.com/artman/publish/printer_51091.php


All the credit, for this, goes to caesu.

Yes and I posted that translated article last night in the forum using Caesu's trick ::MonkeyWink::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #789 1/1/09 -
Post by: snoopy on January 03, 2009, 11:28:14 AM
Good morning monkeys!!

Jen and Kermit  Thanks for once again making things crystal clear.  It's too bad some just don't want to hear the truth.

And Kermit I'm sorry I never acknowledged your service to this great nation.  Thank you from the bottom of my heart for standing on the wall for me, and everyone who loves freedom.  It is not free.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #789 1/1/09 -
Post by: truthseeker2 on January 03, 2009, 11:28:17 AM
"Klye:  I did not give the information to the FBI and I'm unaware of anyone relaying the possibility to them.


Sorry Kermit, but this one sentence all by itself doesn't tell me that the FBI didn't get information.  The sentence in of itself and without the entire context says Kyle is unaware of anyone relaying the possibility that he did not give information to the FBI.  As used here, that makes no sense.  That's probably not what it means, but posted as is doesn't tell me the full scope of what Kyle is responding to.  Do you have the full context of that quote?  The actual question he is responding to in full?


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #789 1/1/09 -
Post by: texasmom on January 03, 2009, 11:29:58 AM
Amigoe has an article about Brinkman but you have to be a subsriber to read it

If you change the word artikel (in the url) to printer, you will be able to open the subscription articles.

http://www.amigoe.com/artman/publish/printer_51091.php


All the credit, for this, goes to caesu.

Thanks Buckeye, now I remember his posting that.  I remembered the trick; just forgot which word to change.

And Thank You caesu!   ::MonkeyCool::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #789 1/1/09 -
Post by: KYcat on January 03, 2009, 11:33:51 AM
"Klye:  I did not give the information to the FBI and I'm unaware of anyone relaying the possibility to them.


Sorry Kermit, but this one sentence all by itself doesn't tell me that the FBI didn't get information.  The sentence in of itself and without the entire context says Kyle is unaware of anyone relaying the possibility that he did not give information to the FBI.  As used here, that makes no sense.  That's probably not what it means, but posted as is doesn't tell me the full scope of what Kyle is responding to.  Do you have the full context of that quote?  The actual question he is responding to in full?

At this point, whatever the information was, the simple fact is KYLE DID NOT GIVE IT TO THE FBI>  and if he was the only one who had it........who the hell else could give it to them!


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #789 1/1/09 -
Post by: truthseeker2 on January 03, 2009, 11:34:01 AM
Folks, I left early last night, but catching up gives me reason to be a little suspicious this morning.  We got somewhat good news from CAPS, Kermie and Red.  Then an interesting discussion begins about Columbian connections and following the money.  In the middle of that LDStLou shows up again to defend Kyle some more the the topic of discussion is completely forgotten. ::MonkeyConfused::

Thanks to Kermit for coming back and backing up everything that was said concerning Kyle.

Ree...KeepTheFaith and I started the discussion about following the money.  I assure you it was to do nothing other than have a discussion.  The issue of Kyle seems to be the only thing allowed in here anymore.  I would like to discuss other topics as well.  No conspiracy...


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #789 1/1/09 -
Post by: KYcat on January 03, 2009, 11:35:54 AM
"Klye:  I did not give the information to the FBI and I'm unaware of anyone relaying the possibility to them.


Sorry Kermit, but this one sentence all by itself doesn't tell me that the FBI didn't get information.  The sentence in of itself and without the entire context says Kyle is unaware of anyone relaying the possibility that he did not give information to the FBI.  As used here, that makes no sense.  That's probably not what it means, but posted as is doesn't tell me the full scope of what Kyle is responding to.  Do you have the full context of that quote?  The actual question he is responding to in full?

At this point, whatever the information was, the simple fact is KYLE DID NOT GIVE IT TO THE FBI>  and if he was the only one who had it........who the hell else could give it to them!


AND......... the full posts are here SOMEWHERE as to what this post pertains to.  I have read it. 

Going to take a shower............  BYE


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #789 1/1/09 -
Post by: Keepthefaith on January 03, 2009, 11:39:13 AM
Folks, I left early last night, but catching up gives me reason to be a little suspicious this morning.  We got somewhat good news from CAPS, Kermie and Red.  Then an interesting discussion begins about Columbian connections and following the money.  In the middle of that LDStLou shows up again to defend Kyle some more the the topic of discussion is completely forgotten. ::MonkeyConfused::

Thanks to Kermit for coming back and backing up everything that was said concerning Kyle.

Ree...KeepTheFaith and I started the discussion about following the money.  I assure you it was to do nothing other than have a discussion.  The issue of Kyle seems to be the only thing allowed in here anymore.  I would like to discuss other topics as well.  No conspiracy...

I don't think Ree was meaning anything negative towards us Truthseeker2.Correct me if i'm wrong Ree!TIA.Did You read about Nilo swean getting in a car wreck Truthseeker2?


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #789 1/1/09 -
Post by: wreck on January 03, 2009, 11:41:18 AM
The problem for some here is that they take ONE sentence and analyze it to death. In order to comprehend what Kermit, Jen etc. are telling us, you need to step back and look at the whole picture. Each statement by Kyle alone is "defensible" -- NOT, however when you look at the whole picture and in the proper time table.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #789 1/1/09 -
Post by: texasmom on January 03, 2009, 11:51:19 AM
Folks, I left early last night, but catching up gives me reason to be a little suspicious this morning.  We got somewhat good news from CAPS, Kermie and Red.  Then an interesting discussion begins about Columbian connections and following the money.  In the middle of that LDStLou shows up again to defend Kyle some more the the topic of discussion is completely forgotten. ::MonkeyConfused::

Thanks to Kermit for coming back and backing up everything that was said concerning Kyle.

Ree...KeepTheFaith and I started the discussion about following the money.  I assure you it was to do nothing other than have a discussion.  The issue of Kyle seems to be the only thing allowed in here anymore.  I would like to discuss other topics as well.  No conspiracy...

I don't think Ree was meaning anything negative towards us Truthseeker2.Correct me if i'm wrong Ree!TIA.Did You read about Nilo swean getting in a car wreck Truthseeker2?

That's the way I read it too; her comment was in regard to ldstlou's posts that distracted from the conversation about follow the money.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #789 1/1/09 -
Post by: Keepthefaith on January 03, 2009, 11:51:28 AM
* Arlene Ellis-Schipper is a board of directors for CMB bank http://www.cmbnv.com/directors.php
* Paulus van der Sloot went to the CMB bank twice the day after Natalee was kidnapped by his son
* Lincoln Gomez and Nilo Swean are financial guys on the boards of these banks
(I'm going to add to this original post that the banks are significant to follow the money)
http://scaredmonkeys.net/index.php?topic=4186.520


Anita's email was SETAR

Anita van der Sloot email:
> > > > >(i edited) @setarnet.aw

SO IS Gottenbos
Email: ica@setarnet.aw

The 100 million dollars that Croes is talking about is the tax exemption or tax holiday that the refinery currently has. “Setar pays every year 75 million florins in taxes”, said Croes.
http://tinyurl.com/qefda
http://scaredmonkeys.net/index.php?topic=4186.620


If we can unlock what Paulus was doing at that bank,who he spoke with and why?I know it's been gone over a thousand times but it drives me bananas.... ::MonkeyDance::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #789 1/1/09 -
Post by: truthseeker2 on January 03, 2009, 11:51:30 AM
Folks, I left early last night, but catching up gives me reason to be a little suspicious this morning.  We got somewhat good news from CAPS, Kermie and Red.  Then an interesting discussion begins about Columbian connections and following the money.  In the middle of that LDStLou shows up again to defend Kyle some more the the topic of discussion is completely forgotten. ::MonkeyConfused::

Thanks to Kermit for coming back and backing up everything that was said concerning Kyle.

Ree...KeepTheFaith and I started the discussion about following the money.  I assure you it was to do nothing other than have a discussion.  The issue of Kyle seems to be the only thing allowed in here anymore.  I would like to discuss other topics as well.  No conspiracy...

I don't think Ree was meaning anything negative towards us Truthseeker2.Correct me if i'm wrong Ree!TIA.Did You read about Nilo swean getting in a car wreck Truthseeker2?

Not yet.  How bad was it?


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #789 1/1/09 -
Post by: texasmom on January 03, 2009, 11:52:48 AM
The problem for some here is that they take ONE sentence and analyze it to death. In order to comprehend what Kermit, Jen etc. are telling us, you need to step back and look at the whole picture. Each statement by Kyle alone is "defensible" -- NOT, however when you look at the whole picture and in the proper time table.

I agree wreck!   ::MonkeyCool::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #789 1/1/09 -
Post by: Keepthefaith on January 03, 2009, 11:52:50 AM
* Arlene Ellis-Schipper is a board of directors for CMB bank http://www.cmbnv.com/directors.php
* Paulus van der Sloot went to the CMB bank twice the day after Natalee was kidnapped by his son
* Lincoln Gomez and Nilo Swean are financial guys on the boards of these banks
(I'm going to add to this original post that the banks are significant to follow the money)
http://scaredmonkeys.net/index.php?topic=4186.520


Anita's email was SETAR

Anita van der Sloot email:
> > > > >(i edited) @setarnet.aw

SO IS Gottenbos
Email: ica@setarnet.aw

The 100 million dollars that Croes is talking about is the tax exemption or tax holiday that the refinery currently has. “Setar pays every year 75 million florins in taxes”, said Croes.
http://tinyurl.com/qefda
http://scaredmonkeys.net/index.php?topic=4186.620


If we can unlock what Paulus was doing at that bank,who he spoke with and why?I know it's been gone over a thousand times but it drives me bananas.... ::MonkeyDance::

Truthseeker2!Do you have any lineage on Gomez and Swean??


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #789 1/1/09 -
Post by: Keepthefaith on January 03, 2009, 11:54:32 AM
Folks, I left early last night, but catching up gives me reason to be a little suspicious this morning.  We got somewhat good news from CAPS, Kermie and Red.  Then an interesting discussion begins about Columbian connections and following the money.  In the middle of that LDStLou shows up again to defend Kyle some more the the topic of discussion is completely forgotten. ::MonkeyConfused::

Thanks to Kermit for coming back and backing up everything that was said concerning Kyle.

Ree...KeepTheFaith and I started the discussion about following the money.  I assure you it was to do nothing other than have a discussion.  The issue of Kyle seems to be the only thing allowed in here anymore.  I would like to discuss other topics as well.  No conspiracy...

I don't think Ree was meaning anything negative towards us Truthseeker2.Correct me if i'm wrong Ree!TIA.Did You read about Nilo swean getting in a car wreck Truthseeker2?

Not yet.  How bad was it?

Not bad at all.Just found it interesting.Posted it at the end of last night.will find it and bring it forward.Just kinda interesting.His ears must have started burning and he lost control of the car! ::MonkeyDance:: ::MonkeyDance:: I kid you!!!


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #789 1/1/09 -
Post by: Keepthefaith on January 03, 2009, 11:56:26 AM
Minister Swaen envolvi den accidente 
Policial 
Tuesday, 30 December 2008 - 00:00 
Dialuna atardi na altura di Codemsa a sosode un accidente entre e Toyota Corrola A-26978 y e Toyota Starlet A-26520. No ta conosi e motibo exacto di e accidente pero den e Corrola tabata maneha pa Minister di Finansas Sr. Nilo Swean y na momento cu e la bai baha pa atende cu e otro chauffeur tocante di e accidente, e chauffer di e Toyota Starlet a baha y ranca careda bai lagando su auto atras. E Minister a dicidi di jama Polis y a keda sinta den su auto warda wak si tog ainda e chauffer di e otro auto lo por regresa pa buska su auto. Click read more pa mas imagen.

Is this the same Nilo Swean related to CMB???


http://www.24ora.com/content/view/6906/8/

Here you go Truthseeker2...


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #789 1/1/09 -
Post by: truthseeker2 on January 03, 2009, 11:56:44 AM
The problem for some here is that they take ONE sentence and analyze it to death. In order to comprehend what Kermit, Jen etc. are telling us, you need to step back and look at the whole picture. Each statement by Kyle alone is "defensible" -- NOT, however when you look at the whole picture and in the proper time table.

Excuse me, wreck, but the whole picture has not been presented.  With all due respect, I am just as capable of comprehending as any other monkey.  That one sentence appears without the full context of the question that elicited the response.  I prefer to have more information and I hope you do not mind of I ask for it.  If it cannot be provided, then I will still question the conclusions.  Not agree or disagee, just question. 

Stepping back is good advice, maybe, for all of us.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #789 1/1/09 -
Post by: KYcat on January 03, 2009, 11:57:25 AM
The problem for some here is that they take ONE sentence and analyze it to death. In order to comprehend what Kermit, Jen etc. are telling us, you need to step back and look at the whole picture. Each statement by Kyle alone is "defensible" -- NOT, however when you look at the whole picture and in the proper time table.

Yes, please step back and look at the whole picture.  If you question something that you don't think is valid, go back and look at the "supporting" documentation that has been provided over and over and over AND OVER again.  If you don't go back and look, then someone else will, and then we start all over again rehashing everything. 

 


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #789 1/1/09 -
Post by: Keepthefaith on January 03, 2009, 11:59:11 AM
Hello CapsLockWizard!Do you know the story behind what tanspired with Paulus at the CMB bank,who he talked to and why?


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #789 1/1/09 -
Post by: KYcat on January 03, 2009, 12:00:50 PM
The problem for some here is that they take ONE sentence and analyze it to death. In order to comprehend what Kermit, Jen etc. are telling us, you need to step back and look at the whole picture. Each statement by Kyle alone is "defensible" -- NOT, however when you look at the whole picture and in the proper time table.

Excuse me, wreck, but the whole picture has not been presented.  With all due respect, I am just as capable of comprehending as any other monkey.  That one sentence appears without the full context of the question that elicited the response.  I prefer to have more information and I hope you do not mind of I ask for it.  If it cannot be provided, then I will still question the conclusions.  Not agree or disagee, just question. 

Stepping back is good advice, maybe, for all of us.

Truth, with all due respect, this information has been posted repeatedly.  You have been here, you know this.  It is great to question, but why question something that has been stated so many times over.  You are capable of going back and reading these posts like all the rest of us.  They are there.  Do you want us to drag them back out to prove that single post of Kermits? 


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #789 1/1/09 -
Post by: klaasend on January 03, 2009, 12:02:04 PM
Must be a slow day at CnG   ::MonkeyCool::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #789 1/1/09 -
Post by: KYcat on January 03, 2009, 12:03:40 PM
Must be a slow day at CnG   ::MonkeyCool::

 ::MonkeyLaugh::


I promise I am leaving now, I am a clean monkey, and am off to "town".

BBL


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #789 1/1/09 -
Post by: Anna on January 03, 2009, 12:03:41 PM
I never believed that Paulus went to the bank twice.  Once if at all and think he was just saying he went twice to cover being away from his desk at work for so much of the day.  He must have had some cushy job if he could leave twice for over an hour each time just to make a personal bank deposit for small sum of Joran.

I have always thought it was just an excuse for being away from work especially the time he claimed to have driven half an hour each way and left without even making the deposit.  That makes no sense at all.

JMO




Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #789 1/1/09 -
Post by: hotping on January 03, 2009, 12:06:36 PM
Klaas....You are sooo Observant..lol  ::MonkeyWink::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #789 1/1/09 -
Post by: Keepthefaith on January 03, 2009, 12:07:53 PM
I never believed that Paulus went to the bank twice.  Once if at all and think he was just saying he went twice to cover being away from his desk at work for so much of the day.  He must have had some cushy job if he could leave twice for over an hour each time just to make a personal bank deposit for small sum of Joran.

I have always thought it was just an excuse for being away from work especially the time he claimed to have driven half an hour each way and left without even making the deposit.  That makes no sense at all.

JMO




Maybe not two trips but he went there got what he wanted to accomplish done and got to planning the cover-up???


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #789 1/1/09 -
Post by: wreck on January 03, 2009, 12:08:03 PM
The problem for some here is that they take ONE sentence and analyze it to death. In order to comprehend what Kermit, Jen etc. are telling us, you need to step back and look at the whole picture. Each statement by Kyle alone is "defensible" -- NOT, however when you look at the whole picture and in the proper time table.

Excuse me, wreck, but the whole picture has not been presented.  With all due respect, I am just as capable of comprehending as any other monkey.  That one sentence appears without the full context of the question that elicited the response.  I prefer to have more information and I hope you do not mind of I ask for it.  If it cannot be provided, then I will still question the conclusions.  Not agree or disagee, just question. 

Stepping back is good advice, maybe, for all of us.
I'm sorry if you took offense -- what I said was not necessiarly aimed at you, it was meant for everyone. That said, did you read jen's and kermits replies late last night. The "bigger picture" and time frames are more clearly defined.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #789 1/1/09 -
Post by: truthseeker2 on January 03, 2009, 12:08:39 PM
* Arlene Ellis-Schipper is a board of directors for CMB bank http://www.cmbnv.com/directors.php
* Paulus van der Sloot went to the CMB bank twice the day after Natalee was kidnapped by his son
* Lincoln Gomez and Nilo Swean are financial guys on the boards of these banks
(I'm going to add to this original post that the banks are significant to follow the money)
http://scaredmonkeys.net/index.php?topic=4186.520


Anita's email was SETAR

Anita van der Sloot email:
> > > > >(i edited) @setarnet.aw

SO IS Gottenbos
Email: ica@setarnet.aw

The 100 million dollars that Croes is talking about is the tax exemption or tax holiday that the refinery currently has. “Setar pays every year 75 million florins in taxes”, said Croes.
http://tinyurl.com/qefda
http://scaredmonkeys.net/index.php?topic=4186.620


If we can unlock what Paulus was doing at that bank,who he spoke with and why?I know it's been gone over a thousand times but it drives me bananas.... ::MonkeyDance::

Truthseeker2!Do you have any lineage on Gomez and Swean??

Sorry, my son just called.  Needed to talk to him.  He left going back to school last night and it's an eight hour drive.


I did some checking on them months ago, but it is on another computer.  They haven't been a main focus for me yet as I was very interested in a particular individual in Colombia with possible Aruban ties. 

I'm sure you will understand, especially after what I have seen here over the last few weeks, until I have complete info I think I'm just going to step back a little and not post so much here.  People have a particular line of thought here and I seem to be a bit disruptive.

But, thanks for the conversation last night.  I do miss the variety of subject matter here, but I understand if most would prefer to stay with the one topic.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #789 1/1/09 -
Post by: Rob on January 03, 2009, 12:08:45 PM
Conspiracy? The whole friggin thing since 5-30-2005 has been one giant conspiracy cloak behind the mask of sovereignty.

I thought everyone knew that.

Paulus at CMB -> ask Armin Solongier - he WORKS THERE.

Jossy - when his story is told, jaws will drop. I kid you not. And he even told YOU all most of it. Who owns three islands? Who needs Aruba when a pipeline can juss as easily go to an off shore island?

Who is owed 7.4 million florins by the MEP / Aruban Authorities for over taxation? He told - IT'S HIM.

Who bides his time? He told you - it's him.




Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #789 1/1/09 -
Post by: Keepthefaith on January 03, 2009, 12:08:56 PM
Must be a slow day at CnG   ::MonkeyCool::

 ::MonkeyDance:: Now that's funny!Nothing better then a laugh with your first cup of coffee...


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #789 1/1/09 -
Post by: texasmom on January 03, 2009, 12:10:10 PM
* Arlene Ellis-Schipper is a board of directors for CMB bank http://www.cmbnv.com/directors.php
* Paulus van der Sloot went to the CMB bank twice the day after Natalee was kidnapped by his son
* Lincoln Gomez and Nilo Swean are financial guys on the boards of these banks
(I'm going to add to this original post that the banks are significant to follow the money)
http://scaredmonkeys.net/index.php?topic=4186.520


Anita's email was SETAR

Anita van der Sloot email:
> > > > >(i edited) @setarnet.aw

SO IS Gottenbos
Email: ica@setarnet.aw

The 100 million dollars that Croes is talking about is the tax exemption or tax holiday that the refinery currently has. “Setar pays every year 75 million florins in taxes”, said Croes.
http://tinyurl.com/qefda
http://scaredmonkeys.net/index.php?topic=4186.620


If we can unlock what Paulus was doing at that bank,who he spoke with and why?I know it's been gone over a thousand times but it drives me bananas.... ::MonkeyDance::

Ruth Dijkhoff

From the Freebird's site:

What Was Paulus van der Sloot Really Doing at the Bank?

May 30th 2005 – Paulus van der Sloot stated he made two separate trips to the bank, for the purpose of depositing Joran’s gambling winnings from the night before.

How could Paulus have deposited Joran’s winnings from the night before?

Joran had not won any monies the previous night – he had lost.

Could Paulus have simply tried to use a “deposit” as his excuse for being gone from work on May 30 2005 at around 10:00 am?

Could he have read an official statement given to police by Andre Dos Santos about Joran’s winnings from May 30th, and tried to confuse the issue by saying Joran had won that money on May 29th instead – thus giving himself a plausible reason for going to the bank on May 30th at 3:30 pm?

Paulus was arrested 3 days after Andre gave his statement to authorities, and according to Aruban attorney David Kock, defense attorneys were receiving such statements within 3 or 4 days of them being given.

Did Paulus use information from Andre’s statement to then mislead investigators about his true reason for being at the bank and speaking with Ruth Dijkhoff at 3:30 pm on May 30th?

http://nataleesfreebirds.blogspot.com/

Ruth Dijkhoff died June 18, 2005 IIRC, she was in her fifties.  I'm looking for her obit, I have it saved somewhere.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #789 1/1/09 -
Post by: klaasend on January 03, 2009, 12:10:12 PM
Klaas....You are sooo Observant..lol  ::MonkeyWink::

 ::MonkeyCool::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #789 1/1/09 -
Post by: jen3560 on January 03, 2009, 12:11:00 PM
I never believed that Paulus went to the bank twice.  Once if at all and think he was just saying he went twice to cover being away from his desk at work for so much of the day.  He must have had some cushy job if he could leave twice for over an hour each time just to make a personal bank deposit for small sum of Joran.

I have always thought it was just an excuse for being away from work especially the time he claimed to have driven half an hour each way and left without even making the deposit.  That makes no sense at all.

JMO




Precisely!

And what sum of Joran's was he purporting to try and deposit anyway?  the money that Joran did NOT win the previous night?  Joran didn't win any money until the night of the 30th - NOT the night of the 29th  ::MonkeyWink::

Check our "The Deposit That Wasn't" doc..............I'm unsure of the link to where Klaas posted that here, but here it is at our blog:

http://nataleesfreebirds.blogspot.com/2008/02/deposit-that-wasnt.html


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #789 1/1/09 -
Post by: truthseeker2 on January 03, 2009, 12:12:14 PM
The problem for some here is that they take ONE sentence and analyze it to death. In order to comprehend what Kermit, Jen etc. are telling us, you need to step back and look at the whole picture. Each statement by Kyle alone is "defensible" -- NOT, however when you look at the whole picture and in the proper time table.

Excuse me, wreck, but the whole picture has not been presented.  With all due respect, I am just as capable of comprehending as any other monkey.  That one sentence appears without the full context of the question that elicited the response.  I prefer to have more information and I hope you do not mind of I ask for it.  If it cannot be provided, then I will still question the conclusions.  Not agree or disagee, just question. 

Stepping back is good advice, maybe, for all of us.

Truth, with all due respect, this information has been posted repeatedly.  You have been here, you know this.  It is great to question, but why question something that has been stated so many times over.  You are capable of going back and reading these posts like all the rest of us.  They are there.  Do you want us to drag them back out to prove that single post of Kermits? 

KY, actually the complete context of that particular statement has not been posted here.  I have been quietly watching for it.

But, I'm stepping back.  One line of discussion here and this is not the only thing I am interested in. 


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #789 1/1/09 -
Post by: Keepthefaith on January 03, 2009, 12:12:40 PM
Conspiracy? The whole friggin thing since 5-30-2005 has been one giant conspiracy cloak behind the mask of sovereignty.

I thought everyone knew that.

Paulus at CMB -> ask Armin Solongier - he WORKS THERE.

Jossy - when his story is told, jaws will drop. I kid you not. And he even told YOU all most of it. Who owns three islands? Who needs Aruba when a pipeline can juss as easily go to an off shore island?

Who is owed 7.4 million florins by the MEP / Aruban Authorities for over taxation? He told - IT'S HIM.

Who bides his time? He told you - it's him.




Is Jossy very,very bad???Ohh geez...


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #789 1/1/09 -
Post by: jen3560 on January 03, 2009, 12:12:54 PM
 ::MonkeyCool::

LOL Texasmom!  great minds and all!!


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #789 1/1/09 -
Post by: 2NJSons_Mom on January 03, 2009, 12:14:44 PM
Folks, I left early last night, but catching up gives me reason to be a little suspicious this morning.  We got somewhat good news from CAPS, Kermie and Red.  Then an interesting discussion begins about Columbian connections and following the money.  In the middle of that LDStLou shows up again to defend Kyle some more the the topic of discussion is completely forgotten. ::MonkeyConfused::

Thanks to Kermit for coming back and backing up everything that was said concerning Kyle.

Ree...KeepTheFaith and I started the discussion about following the money.  I assure you it was to do nothing other than have a discussion.  The issue of Kyle seems to be the only thing allowed in here anymore.   I would like to discuss other topics as well.  No conspiracy...

This is not true and I also think Ree was disappointed the discussion was interrupted.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #789 1/1/09 -
Post by: Rob on January 03, 2009, 12:16:37 PM
Conspiracy? The whole friggin thing since 5-30-2005 has been one giant conspiracy cloak behind the mask of sovereignty.

I thought everyone knew that.

Paulus at CMB -> ask Armin Solongier - he WORKS THERE.

Jossy - when his story is told, jaws will drop. I kid you not. And he even told YOU all most of it. Who owns three islands? Who needs Aruba when a pipeline can juss as easily go to an off shore island?

Who is owed 7.4 million florins by the MEP / Aruban Authorities for over taxation? He told - IT'S HIM.

Who bides his time? He told you - it's him.




Is Jossy very,very bad???Ohh geez...

according Jamie Skeeters - he's the head of the cartel. that's Jamie's answer.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #789 1/1/09 -
Post by: klaasend on January 03, 2009, 12:16:46 PM
Truthseeker2 - one line of discussion here?  Really?  Makes me wonder why you bother.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #789 1/1/09 -
Post by: texasmom on January 03, 2009, 12:18:01 PM
Must be a slow day at CnG   ::MonkeyCool::

 ::MonkeyHaHa::

Apparently everyday's a slow day there, they are all here lurking!  Then they draw straws for the next drive by! 


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #789 1/1/09 -
Post by: truthseeker2 on January 03, 2009, 12:18:31 PM
The problem for some here is that they take ONE sentence and analyze it to death. In order to comprehend what Kermit, Jen etc. are telling us, you need to step back and look at the whole picture. Each statement by Kyle alone is "defensible" -- NOT, however when you look at the whole picture and in the proper time table.

Excuse me, wreck, but the whole picture has not been presented.  With all due respect, I am just as capable of comprehending as any other monkey.  That one sentence appears without the full context of the question that elicited the response.  I prefer to have more information and I hope you do not mind of I ask for it.  If it cannot be provided, then I will still question the conclusions.  Not agree or disagee, just question. 

Stepping back is good advice, maybe, for all of us.
I'm sorry if you took offense -- what I said was not necessiarly aimed at you, it was meant for everyone. That said, did you read jen's and kermits replies late last night. The "bigger picture" and time frames are more clearly defined.

Yeahg, I got all that.    For me, the "bigger picture" needs a frame.  And having not been a Freebird I cannot know the FULL scope of the conversations.

Not big deal.  I think if monkeys believe this about Kyle and the Persistence then they just do.

It has ocurred to me that if someone is involved with giving information to the FBI, they may just not tell everything they gave to the FBI if the FBI does not want them to.  I think I am just going to trust the FBI.  If Kyle and the Persistence did anything wrong here I am sure they will handle it without my help.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #789 1/1/09 -
Post by: Keepthefaith on January 03, 2009, 12:19:39 PM
Conspiracy? The whole friggin thing since 5-30-2005 has been one giant conspiracy cloak behind the mask of sovereignty.

I thought everyone knew that.

Paulus at CMB -> ask Armin Solongier - he WORKS THERE.

Jossy - when his story is told, jaws will drop. I kid you not. And he even told YOU all most of it. Who owns three islands? Who needs Aruba when a pipeline can juss as easily go to an off shore island?

Who is owed 7.4 million florins by the MEP / Aruban Authorities for over taxation? He told - IT'S HIM.

Who bides his time? He told you - it's him.




Is Jossy very,very bad???Ohh geez...

according Jamie Skeeters - he's the head of the cartel. that's Jamie's answer.

Thanx Rob.Still trying to understand what Eduardo's role is if any?Hope you rang in a Happy New Year.Them damn tapes that Greta has from Tj.She ever gonna play those?

Snowing again in Seattle... ::MonkeyEek::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #789 1/1/09 -
Post by: texasmom on January 03, 2009, 12:20:47 PM
::MonkeyCool::

LOL Texasmom!  great minds and all!!

 ::MonkeyWink::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #789 1/1/09 -
Post by: Anna on January 03, 2009, 12:24:11 PM
One doesn't have to "do" anything "wrong" if one only stands by and allows ALE to abscond with the contents of the fish trap.

When have we ever seen ALE handled evidence of anything in this entire investigation in a professional and reliable manner?


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #789 1/1/09 -
Post by: truthseeker2 on January 03, 2009, 12:24:59 PM
Truthseeker2 - one line of discussion here?  Really?  Makes me wonder why you bother.

Hoping, Klaas.  Just hoping.

I have always liked SM, Klaas.  I'm sure you see me lurking everyday.  I have always been here.  I have watched the evolution.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #789 1/1/09 -
Post by: hotping on January 03, 2009, 12:25:09 PM
Must be a slow day at CnG   ::MonkeyCool::

 ::MonkeyHaHa::

Apparently everyday's a slow day there, they are all here lurking!  Then they draw straws for the next drive by! 
::MonkeyWink::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #789 1/1/09 -
Post by: johan555 on January 03, 2009, 12:25:38 PM
I never believed that Paulus went to the bank twice.  Once if at all and think he was just saying he went twice to cover being away from his desk at work for so much of the day.  He must have had some cushy job if he could leave twice for over an hour each time just to make a personal bank deposit for small sum of Joran.

I have always thought it was just an excuse for being away from work especially the time he claimed to have driven half an hour each way and left without even making the deposit.  That makes no sense at all.

JMO




about the bank :



 I can also remember that around 10.00 hours I went
to the C.M.B. bank. There were long cues at the bank so I left without
having made any transaction and went back to work. I left my workplace
at approximately 15.00 hours. I arrived at the bank at approximately 15.30.
I had gone to the C.M.B. bank that is situated in Noord.

To your question whether I went to the bank without stopping
or going anywhere else, I can state the following. I at least cannot
remember having been anywhere else. I think I went directly to the bank.
At the bank I talked to Ruth DIJKHOFF. At the bank I deposited the
money that Joran said that he had won in the “Free Tournament in
the Holiday Inn” on the 29th of May 2005. It was approximately
500 Aruban guilders. Joran had given me 100 guilders because he
had taken over my place in the tournament.
After depositing the money I went home.

Why does he say that Joran won a Tournament  in the Bank ?
what is the legal age for gambling in Aruba ? Is he proud ?
 He use the name Ruth as a kind of witness ?
And why  2 times to the bank to bring 100 guilders ?


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #789 1/1/09 -
Post by: Anna on January 03, 2009, 12:27:43 PM
I see a large variety of subjects posted on here daily, certainly not just one.

One of major interest is who is going to meet with Hero Brinkman in Aruba this week.

It seems JQK is pretty certain to be there but we are awaiting word from Greta?  They need coverage for sure so hope she will make it.

Otherwise, how will we know what is being said.

And she still has yet to say anything about those tapes from TJ.

Sometimes Greta moves too slowly to suit me.

.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #789 1/1/09 -
Post by: Buckeye on January 03, 2009, 12:28:35 PM
Truthseeker2 - one line of discussion here?  Really?  Makes me wonder why you bother.

Hoping, Klaas.  Just hoping.

I have always liked SM, Klaas.  I'm sure you see me lurking everyday.  I have always been here.  I have watched the evolution.

I posted about Guido, today and caesu posted about the Aruba meeting with JQK and all.  Maybe a post regarding what you'd like to discus would be an option.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #789 1/1/09 -
Post by: Edward on January 03, 2009, 12:30:28 PM
Conspiracy? The whole friggin thing since 5-30-2005 has been one giant conspiracy cloak behind the mask of sovereignty.

I thought everyone knew that.

Paulus at CMB -> ask Armin Solongier - he WORKS THERE.

Jossy - when his story is told, jaws will drop. I kid you not. And he even told YOU all most of it. Who owns three islands? Who needs Aruba when a pipeline can juss as easily go to an off shore island?

Who is owed 7.4 million florins by the MEP / Aruban Authorities for over taxation? He told - IT'S HIM.

Who bides his time? He told you - it's him.




Is Jossy very,very bad???Ohh geez...

according Jamie Skeeters - he's the head of the cartel. that's Jamie's answer.

He is still my favorite Mobster Lobster.. So smooth So Sleek.. So connected..
He is a spokesman.. I do not know if he is the Big Cheese.. But he is somebody in a Familia.
No doubt about it..
But for all I know.. The Mob could be on our side in this situation. Or they created the situation on 5-30-05
I suppose we wont know until we reach the truth of the matter.
jmho


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #789 1/1/09 -
Post by: Keepthefaith on January 03, 2009, 12:31:23 PM
I see a large variety of subjects posted on here daily, certainly not just one.

One of major interest is who is going to meet with Hero Brinkman in Aruba this week.

It seems JQK is pretty certain to be there but we are awaiting word from Greta?  They need coverage for sure so hope she will make it.

Otherwise, how will we know what is being said.

And she still has yet to say anything about those tapes from TJ.

Sometimes Greta moves too slowly to suit me.

.

Maybe those are a nail in the coffin?Gonna be an interesting week!


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #789 1/1/09 -
Post by: truthseeker2 on January 03, 2009, 12:31:32 PM
I see a large variety of subjects posted on here daily, certainly not just one.

One of major interest is who is going to meet with Hero Brinkman in Aruba this week.

It seems JQK is pretty certain to be there but we are awaiting word from Greta?  They need coverage for sure so hope she will make it.

Otherwise, how will we know what is being said.

And she still has yet to say anything about those tapes from TJ.

Sometimes Greta moves too slowly to suit me.

.

Yes, Greta does move slowly sometimes.  I do like the Gretawire blogs, though. 

I have been anxiously awaiting to hear about what is on those tapes since Rob posted about them.  The Colombia question has been on my mind for a while now.

 


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #789 1/1/09 -
Post by: klaasend on January 03, 2009, 12:33:25 PM
One doesn't have to "do" anything "wrong" if one only stands by and allows ALE to abscond with the contents of the fish trap.

When have we ever seen ALE handled evidence of anything in this entire investigation in a professional and reliable manner?

We haven't


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #789 1/1/09 -
Post by: truthseeker2 on January 03, 2009, 12:33:57 PM
Truthseeker2 - one line of discussion here?  Really?  Makes me wonder why you bother.

Hoping, Klaas.  Just hoping.

I have always liked SM, Klaas.  I'm sure you see me lurking everyday.  I have always been here.  I have watched the evolution.

I posted about Guido, today and caesu posted about the Aruba meeting with JQK and all.  Maybe a post regarding what you'd like to discus would be an option.

Yes, and I see them.  (maybe that is why I still "bother" to come?) They do not draw much discussion though. 


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #789 1/1/09 -
Post by: klaasend on January 03, 2009, 12:35:17 PM
Truthseeker2 - one line of discussion here?  Really?  Makes me wonder why you bother.

Hoping, Klaas.  Just hoping.

I have always liked SM, Klaas.  I'm sure you see me lurking everyday.  I have always been here.  I have watched the evolution.

 ::MonkeyHaHa::  Good, then you know we aren't as easily fooled


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #789 1/1/09 -
Post by: Anna on January 03, 2009, 12:36:12 PM
I have never understood why some believe the words of the prime suspects plus Paulus as to what they did and when.  Unless someone can show me proof from another source, I don't just take them at their word.  This goes not only for Paulus' account of his banking activities but also the fact that Satish asked how the girl was the following morning.

We have only the word of Kalpoes for that as well.  Maybe he did and maybe he didn't.  No one else heard it.  How would we know?

And yet things like this some how become accepted as fact and other things such as the direct quotes from a poster are disregarded.

I would like more to come of the tapes from the Colombians as those allegedly do contain some direct information that we have not heard before.



Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #789 1/1/09 -
Post by: Blue Moon on January 03, 2009, 12:39:02 PM
* Arlene Ellis-Schipper is a board of directors for CMB bank http://www.cmbnv.com/directors.php
* Paulus van der Sloot went to the CMB bank twice the day after Natalee was kidnapped by his son
* Lincoln Gomez and Nilo Swean are financial guys on the boards of these banks
(I'm going to add to this original post that the banks are significant to follow the money)
http://scaredmonkeys.net/index.php?topic=4186.520


Anita's email was SETAR

Anita van der Sloot email:
> > > > >(i edited) @setarnet.aw

SO IS Gottenbos
Email: ica@setarnet.aw

The 100 million dollars that Croes is talking about is the tax exemption or tax holiday that the refinery currently has. “Setar pays every year 75 million florins in taxes”, said Croes.
http://tinyurl.com/qefda
http://scaredmonkeys.net/index.php?topic=4186.620


If we can unlock what Paulus was doing at that bank,who he spoke with and why?I know it's been gone over a thousand times but it drives me bananas.... ::MonkeyDance::

Truthseeker2!Do you have any lineage on Gomez and Swean??

Sorry, my son just called.  Needed to talk to him.  He left going back to school last night and it's an eight hour drive.


I did some checking on them months ago, but it is on another computer.  They haven't been a main focus for me yet as I was very interested in a particular individual in Colombia with possible Aruban ties. 

I'm sure you will understand, especially after what I have seen here over the last few weeks, until I have complete info I think I'm just going to step back a little and not post so much here.  People have a particular line of thought here and I seem to be a bit disruptive.

But, thanks for the conversation last night.  I do miss the variety of subject matter here, but I understand if most would prefer to stay with the one topic.

Truth, Do you think there are Columbian ties, maybe Paulus paid a Columbian drug dealer to dispose of Natalee's body in the trap? Maybe some truth to a little Joran told Great about the payoff of $10,000 less $400 (the amount Paulus seems to have deposited into the bank for Joran).  Maybe Paulus did make that deposit as well as a withdrawal at the same time.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #789 1/1/09 -
Post by: truthseeker2 on January 03, 2009, 12:39:07 PM
Truthseeker2 - one line of discussion here?  Really?  Makes me wonder why you bother.

Hoping, Klaas.  Just hoping.

I have always liked SM, Klaas.  I'm sure you see me lurking everyday.  I have always been here.  I have watched the evolution.

 ::MonkeyHaHa::  Good, then you know aren't as easily fooled

Klaas..what is this?  Why would I even WANT to fool anyone?  I hae been here for a very long time.  And you know that.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #789 1/1/09 -
Post by: Keepthefaith on January 03, 2009, 12:41:16 PM
* Arlene Ellis-Schipper is a board of directors for CMB bank http://www.cmbnv.com/directors.php
* Paulus van der Sloot went to the CMB bank twice the day after Natalee was kidnapped by his son
* Lincoln Gomez and Nilo Swean are financial guys on the boards of these banks
(I'm going to add to this original post that the banks are significant to follow the money)
http://scaredmonkeys.net/index.php?topic=4186.520


Anita's email was SETAR

Anita van der Sloot email:
> > > > >(i edited) @setarnet.aw

SO IS Gottenbos
Email: ica@setarnet.aw

The 100 million dollars that Croes is talking about is the tax exemption or tax holiday that the refinery currently has. “Setar pays every year 75 million florins in taxes”, said Croes.
http://tinyurl.com/qefda
http://scaredmonkeys.net/index.php?topic=4186.620


If we can unlock what Paulus was doing at that bank,who he spoke with and why?I know it's been gone over a thousand times but it drives me bananas.... ::MonkeyDance::

Truthseeker2!Do you have any lineage on Gomez and Swean??

Sorry, my son just called.  Needed to talk to him.  He left going back to school last night and it's an eight hour drive.


I did some checking on them months ago, but it is on another computer.  They haven't been a main focus for me yet as I was very interested in a particular individual in Colombia with possible Aruban ties. 

I'm sure you will understand, especially after what I have seen here over the last few weeks, until I have complete info I think I'm just going to step back a little and not post so much here.  People have a particular line of thought here and I seem to be a bit disruptive.

But, thanks for the conversation last night.  I do miss the variety of subject matter here, but I understand if most would prefer to stay with the one topic.

Truth, Do you think there are Columbian ties, maybe Paulus paid a Columbian drug dealer to dispose of Natalee's body in the trap? Maybe some truth to a little Joran told Great about the payoff of $10,000 less $400 (the amount Paulus seems to have deposited into the bank for Joran).  Maybe Paulus did make that deposit as well as a withdrawal at the same time.

I thought the $400 dollars was such a round about number?I think i'd take more then $400 dollars for my service! ::MonkeyLaugh::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #789 1/1/09 -
Post by: truthseeker2 on January 03, 2009, 12:45:02 PM
* Arlene Ellis-Schipper is a board of directors for CMB bank http://www.cmbnv.com/directors.php
* Paulus van der Sloot went to the CMB bank twice the day after Natalee was kidnapped by his son
* Lincoln Gomez and Nilo Swean are financial guys on the boards of these banks
(I'm going to add to this original post that the banks are significant to follow the money)
http://scaredmonkeys.net/index.php?topic=4186.520


Anita's email was SETAR

Anita van der Sloot email:
> > > > >(i edited) @setarnet.aw

SO IS Gottenbos
Email: ica@setarnet.aw

The 100 million dollars that Croes is talking about is the tax exemption or tax holiday that the refinery currently has. “Setar pays every year 75 million florins in taxes”, said Croes.
http://tinyurl.com/qefda
http://scaredmonkeys.net/index.php?topic=4186.620


If we can unlock what Paulus was doing at that bank,who he spoke with and why?I know it's been gone over a thousand times but it drives me bananas.... ::MonkeyDance::

Truthseeker2!Do you have any lineage on Gomez and Swean??

Sorry, my son just called.  Needed to talk to him.  He left going back to school last night and it's an eight hour drive.


I did some checking on them months ago, but it is on another computer.  They haven't been a main focus for me yet as I was very interested in a particular individual in Colombia with possible Aruban ties. 

I'm sure you will understand, especially after what I have seen here over the last few weeks, until I have complete info I think I'm just going to step back a little and not post so much here.  People have a particular line of thought here and I seem to be a bit disruptive.

But, thanks for the conversation last night.  I do miss the variety of subject matter here, but I understand if most would prefer to stay with the one topic.

Truth, Do you think there are Columbian ties, maybe Paulus paid a Columbian drug dealer to dispose of Natalee's body in the trap? Maybe some truth to a little Joran told Great about the payoff of $10,000 less $400 (the amount Paulus seems to have deposited into the bank for Joran).  Maybe Paulus did make that deposit as well as a withdrawal at the same time.

Yes, I do think there could be a Colombian connection.  I started that line of thinking over a year ago and located an individual there with Aruba ties.  I also thought it odd that three nights in a row you Joran and Deepak admittedly together, but none of those times did they admit being with Freddy or Jaime.  Freddy and Jaime along with the Gottenbos bros. were the closer friends.  The statement given by Jaime is curious because of the timing of the phone calls from Joran.  Also, on 5/30 Jaime ends up at the Wyndham at the same time Andre says Joran and Guido coincidently stepped out of the casino. 

I have often believed they may have been meeting Jaime in the parking lot.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #789 1/1/09 -
Post by: truthseeker2 on January 03, 2009, 12:47:14 PM

I thought the $400 dollars was such a round about number?I think i'd take more then $400 dollars for my service! ::MonkeyLaugh::

According to Andre that is about the amount of money Joran won the next day...and the amount of money Joran said was missing from the "bag of money" he claims was given to him for selling Natalee.

They seem to be stuck on $400.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #789 1/1/09 -
Post by: klaasend on January 03, 2009, 12:48:54 PM
Truthseeker2 - one line of discussion here?  Really?  Makes me wonder why you bother.

Hoping, Klaas.  Just hoping.

I have always liked SM, Klaas.  I'm sure you see me lurking everyday.  I have always been here.  I have watched the evolution.

 ::MonkeyHaHa::  Good, then you know we aren't as easily fooled

Klaas..what is this?  Why would I even WANT to fool anyone?  I hae been here for a very long time.  And you know that.

Did I say you were trying to fool people?  Part of the problem we are having in the forum right now is people misinterpreting posts and reading something into them that isn't there.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #789 1/1/09 -
Post by: 2NJSons_Mom on January 03, 2009, 12:50:13 PM

I thought the $400 dollars was such a round about number?I think i'd take more then $400 dollars for my service! ::MonkeyLaugh::

According to Andre that is about the amount of money Joran won the next day...and the amount of money Joran said was missing from the "bag of money" he claims was given to him for selling Natalee.
They seem to be stuck on $400.

Good point.  I wouldn't have thought of that....but I'm not an analyst.  ::MonkeyWink::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #789 1/1/09 -
Post by: Blue Moon on January 03, 2009, 12:50:25 PM
* Arlene Ellis-Schipper is a board of directors for CMB bank http://www.cmbnv.com/directors.php
* Paulus van der Sloot went to the CMB bank twice the day after Natalee was kidnapped by his son
* Lincoln Gomez and Nilo Swean are financial guys on the boards of these banks
(I'm going to add to this original post that the banks are significant to follow the money)
http://scaredmonkeys.net/index.php?topic=4186.520


Anita's email was SETAR

Anita van der Sloot email:
> > > > >(i edited) @setarnet.aw

SO IS Gottenbos
Email: ica@setarnet.aw

The 100 million dollars that Croes is talking about is the tax exemption or tax holiday that the refinery currently has. “Setar pays every year 75 million florins in taxes”, said Croes.
http://tinyurl.com/qefda
http://scaredmonkeys.net/index.php?topic=4186.620


If we can unlock what Paulus was doing at that bank,who he spoke with and why?I know it's been gone over a thousand times but it drives me bananas.... ::MonkeyDance::

Truthseeker2!Do you have any lineage on Gomez and Swean??

Sorry, my son just called.  Needed to talk to him.  He left going back to school last night and it's an eight hour drive.


I did some checking on them months ago, but it is on another computer.  They haven't been a main focus for me yet as I was very interested in a particular individual in Colombia with possible Aruban ties. 

I'm sure you will understand, especially after what I have seen here over the last few weeks, until I have complete info I think I'm just going to step back a little and not post so much here.  People have a particular line of thought here and I seem to be a bit disruptive.

But, thanks for the conversation last night.  I do miss the variety of subject matter here, but I understand if most would prefer to stay with the one topic.

Truth, Do you think there are Columbian ties, maybe Paulus paid a Columbian drug dealer to dispose of Natalee's body in the trap? Maybe some truth to a little Joran told Great about the payoff of $10,000 less $400 (the amount Paulus seems to have deposited into the bank for Joran).  Maybe Paulus did make that deposit as well as a withdrawal at the same time.

Yes, I do think there could be a Colombian connection.  I started that line of thinking over a year ago and located an individual there with Aruba ties.  I also thought it odd that three nights in a row you Joran and Deepak admittedly together, but none of those times did they admit being with Freddy or Jaime.  Freddy and Jaime along with the Gottenbos bros. were the closer friends.  The statement given by Jaime is curious because of the timing of the phone calls from Joran.  Also, on 5/30 Jaime ends up at the Wyndham at the same time Andre says Joran and Guido coincidently stepped out of the casino. 

I have often believed they may have been meeting Jaime in the parking lot.

Would the Columbian ties come from Jamie then?  Is Jamie from Columbia and is his family tied into a cartel of some sorts?  (guess most families in Columbia are tied into drugs in some shape or form-guess this is a stupid question on my part).


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #789 1/1/09 -
Post by: truthseeker2 on January 03, 2009, 12:51:38 PM
Truthseeker2 - one line of discussion here?  Really?  Makes me wonder why you bother.

Hoping, Klaas.  Just hoping.

I have always liked SM, Klaas.  I'm sure you see me lurking everyday.  I have always been here.  I have watched the evolution.

 ::MonkeyHaHa::  Good, then you know we aren't as easily fooled

Klaas..what is this?  Why would I even WANT to fool anyone?  I hae been here for a very long time.  And you know that.

Did I say you were trying to fool people?  Part of the problem we are having in the forum right now is people misinterpreting posts and reading something into them that isn't there.

I'm no dummy. 


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #789 1/1/09 -
Post by: 2NJSons_Mom on January 03, 2009, 12:52:43 PM

I thought the $400 dollars was such a round about number?I think i'd take more then $400 dollars for my service! ::MonkeyLaugh::

According to Andre that is about the amount of money Joran won the next day...and the amount of money Joran said was missing from the "bag of money" he claims was given to him for selling Natalee.
They seem to be stuck on $400.

Good point.  I wouldn't have thought of that....but I'm not an analyst.  ::MonkeyWink::

This was said because I read your posts...


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #789 1/1/09 -
Post by: truthseeker2 on January 03, 2009, 12:54:39 PM


Yes, I do think there could be a Colombian connection.  I started that line of thinking over a year ago and located an individual there with Aruba ties.  I also thought it odd that three nights in a row you Joran and Deepak admittedly together, but none of those times did they admit being with Freddy or Jaime.  Freddy and Jaime along with the Gottenbos bros. were the closer friends.  The statement given by Jaime is curious because of the timing of the phone calls from Joran.  Also, on 5/30 Jaime ends up at the Wyndham at the same time Andre says Joran and Guido coincidently stepped out of the casino. 

I have often believed they may have been meeting Jaime in the parking lot.

Would the Columbian ties come from Jamie then?  Is Jamie from Columbia and is his family tied into a cartel of some sorts?  (guess most families in Columbia are tied into drugs in some shape or form-guess this is a stupid question on my part).

Yes, he is Colombian.  As for his family...I'm working on that.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #789 1/1/09 -
Post by: truthseeker2 on January 03, 2009, 12:55:20 PM

I thought the $400 dollars was such a round about number?I think i'd take more then $400 dollars for my service! ::MonkeyLaugh::

According to Andre that is about the amount of money Joran won the next day...and the amount of money Joran said was missing from the "bag of money" he claims was given to him for selling Natalee.
They seem to be stuck on $400.

Good point.  I wouldn't have thought of that....but I'm not an analyst.  ::MonkeyWink::

This was said because I read your posts...

I knew why it was said.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #789 1/1/09 -
Post by: Edward on January 03, 2009, 01:03:09 PM
Saying he is Colombian or Venezuelan on Aruba is like saying he is Mexican in California.  ::MonkeyTongue::
Of course there is a connection.. There always is.
These people travel back and forth and do business in these 2 countries ALL the time.
There is no secret connection ..It is a daily connection..  ::MonkeyWink::
Families are intertwined like onion rings in this part of the world.
They should build a monorail system, I am sure it is on Hugo's list of things to build after he takes control of Colombia and the ABC islands..



Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #789 1/1/09 -
Post by: bleachedblack on January 03, 2009, 01:06:44 PM
Conspiracy? The whole friggin thing since 5-30-2005 has been one giant conspiracy cloak behind the mask of sovereignty.

I thought everyone knew that.

Paulus at CMB -> ask Armin Solongier - he WORKS THERE.

Jossy - when his story is told, jaws will drop. I kid you not. And he even told YOU all most of it. Who owns three islands? Who needs Aruba when a pipeline can juss as easily go to an off shore island?

Who is owed 7.4 million florins by the MEP / Aruban Authorities for over taxation? He told - IT'S HIM.

Who bides his time? He told you - it's him.




Is Jossy very,very bad???Ohh geez...

according Jamie Skeeters - he's the head of the cartel. that's Jamie's answer.

Another thing to be said about Jossy is that he LOVES Aruba. Above finding answers to what happened to Natalee.....he loves Aruba.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #789 1/1/09 -
Post by: Blue Moon on January 03, 2009, 01:07:03 PM
Saying he is Colombian or Venezuelan on Aruba is like saying he is Mexican in California.  ::MonkeyTongue::
Of course there is a connection.. There always is.
These people travel back and forth and do business in these 2 countries ALL the time.
There is no secret connection ..It is a daily connection..  ::MonkeyWink::
Families are intertwined like onion rings in this part of the world.
They should build a monorail system, I am sure it is on Hugo's list of things to build after he takes control of Colombia and the ABC islands..



I guess what I am getting at would it be Jamie who was paid to dispose of the body or would he be someone in his family maybe still living in Columbia that was paid to do it?


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #789 1/1/09 -
Post by: hotping on January 03, 2009, 01:08:27 PM
Does anyone remember where Daury and Ramona Rodriguez are from....Just Curious? TIA


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #789 1/1/09 -
Post by: truthseeker2 on January 03, 2009, 01:09:24 PM
Saying he is Colombian or Venezuelan on Aruba is like saying he is Mexican in California. True
Of course there is a connection.. There always is.
These people travel back and forth and do business in these 2 countries ALL the time.
There is no secret connection ..It is a daily connection..  Never said it was a secret...on Aruba.  Is it all fully understood here, though?  Look how long it took just to figure out some of the names for who we now believe to be important ties to this whole thing.  Lorenzo's name and face were a mystery for a very long time as was Guido's.
Families are intertwined like onion rings in this part of the world.
They should build a monorail system, I am sure it is on Hugo's list of things to build after he takes control of Colombia and the ABC islands..





Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #789 1/1/09 -
Post by: SS on January 03, 2009, 01:10:05 PM
I have just finished reading pages and pages.  I am feeling really uncomfortable about the FBI involvement, or lack of.  We have heard that Quantico was on board, no FBI was onboard, FBI from Barbados were involved, things were sent daily, things were sent only on 12/30, things were never sent, photographs were sent immediately, nothing was sent, photographs were sent in September, Beth was upset and sought counsel from someone she trusts, and Jug says that nothing was wrong.  Just like draining the pond the other day, this information doesn't add up.  I have a few things that I just am not comfortable about.  Has Kyle been the only source of information detailing FBI involvement?  The Freebirds are reporting Kyle's dates of FBI involvement, yet ldstlou is also reporting Kyle's dates of involvement and they are not the same.  Kermit reported sending information to the FBI in September and that seems to be the only FBI contact that hasn't been disputed.  I would like to see some kind of a breakdown from 12/25 when the cage was first discovered until September when Kermit submitted photographs.

Kermit, Jan, or another Freebird - did anyone compile or would someone compile a timeline of when Kyle reported to you that he had contact with the FBI, either onboard or electronically?

ldstlou - could you put together a timeline from Kyle's information or with his help that would specify when he had contact or had knowledge of contact with the FBI, onboard or electronically?  Dates would be not only helpful, but also needed at this point for clarification.

I think it would be very helpful to see a specific comparison of the two timelines, if for no other reason than because the information source is the same person.  Have I confused everyone?


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #789 1/1/09 -
Post by: Blue Moon on January 03, 2009, 01:10:29 PM
Does anyone remember where Daury and Ramona Rodriguez are from....Just Curious? TIA

A google search says he is a 21 year old Aruban.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #789 1/1/09 -
Post by: truthseeker2 on January 03, 2009, 01:12:33 PM
Saying he is Colombian or Venezuelan on Aruba is like saying he is Mexican in California.  ::MonkeyTongue::
Of course there is a connection.. There always is.
These people travel back and forth and do business in these 2 countries ALL the time.
There is no secret connection ..It is a daily connection..  ::MonkeyWink::
Families are intertwined like onion rings in this part of the world.
They should build a monorail system, I am sure it is on Hugo's list of things to build after he takes control of Colombia and the ABC islands..



I guess what I am getting at would it be Jamie who was paid to dispose of the body or would he be someone in his family maybe still living in Columbia that was paid to do it?

Good questions. Blue.  If not that, was the porn operation really Jaime's little business with the rest of the pimps serving as his minions?  Was jaime the 'leader of the pimps" sotospeak?


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #789 1/1/09 -
Post by: hotping on January 03, 2009, 01:13:56 PM
Does anyone remember where Daury and Ramona Rodriguez are from....Just Curious? TIA

A google search says he is a 21 year old Aruban.
Thanks!


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #789 1/1/09 -
Post by: SS on January 03, 2009, 01:14:14 PM


Yes, I do think there could be a Colombian connection.  I started that line of thinking over a year ago and located an individual there with Aruba ties.  I also thought it odd that three nights in a row you Joran and Deepak admittedly together, but none of those times did they admit being with Freddy or Jaime.  Freddy and Jaime along with the Gottenbos bros. were the closer friends.  The statement given by Jaime is curious because of the timing of the phone calls from Joran.  Also, on 5/30 Jaime ends up at the Wyndham at the same time Andre says Joran and Guido coincidently stepped out of the casino. 

I have often believed they may have been meeting Jaime in the parking lot.

Would the Columbian ties come from Jamie then?  Is Jamie from Columbia and is his family tied into a cartel of some sorts?  (guess most families in Columbia are tied into drugs in some shape or form-guess this is a stupid question on my part).

Yes, he is Colombian.  As for his family...I'm working on that.



Jamie lived with his dad and there were some money problems.  Jamie's mother died before Natalee disappeared.  Joran reported that Jamie's mom was the first dead body that he had seen.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #789 1/1/09 -
Post by: Keepthefaith on January 03, 2009, 01:14:39 PM
Saying he is Colombian or Venezuelan on Aruba is like saying he is Mexican in California.  ::MonkeyTongue::
Of course there is a connection.. There always is.
These people travel back and forth and do business in these 2 countries ALL the time.
There is no secret connection ..It is a daily connection..  ::MonkeyWink::
Families are intertwined like onion rings in this part of the world.
They should build a monorail system, I am sure it is on Hugo's list of things to build after he takes control of Colombia and the ABC islands..



I guess what I am getting at would it be Jamie who was paid to dispose of the body or would he be someone in his family maybe still living in Columbia that was paid to do it?

Good questions. Blue.  If not that, was the porn operation really Jaime's little business with the rest of the pimps serving as his minions?  Was jaime the 'leader of the pimps" sotospeak?

One would think the Van Der Sloot's are to Elitist to dispose of Natalee.It would seem that would be beneath them?If that makes any sense?


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #789 1/1/09 -
Post by: bleachedblack on January 03, 2009, 01:15:29 PM
Must be a slow day at CnG   ::MonkeyCool::

 ::MonkeyHaHa::

Apparently everyday's a slow day there, they are all here lurking!  Then they draw straws for the next drive by! 

Welcome,  :smt075


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #789 1/1/09 -
Post by: billb's daughter on January 03, 2009, 01:15:44 PM
LDSTLOU,
Again, I think you have failed to follow EVERY detail and words of Kyle himself. Kyle has stated that John S. had NO interest in the trap -- in fact he told Kyle "to never bring up the trap" again! Kyle told Freebirds that John S. has NEW business dealings in Aruba. Beth's brother (private eye) was flabbergasted to find out about the Jan. 7th pics in MARCH! That is NOT IMMEDIATELY. Kyle had no responsibilty to turn over ALL pics????? Well, he sure had responsibility to SELL the pics in February!

John did not believe Natalee was in that trap. They had other targets they had located and he wanted to focus on the other targets that were possibilites. Remember, they identified quite a few other possible targets that they were eager to look into. It wasn't because he was hiding anything in the trap, he felt they had eliminated the possibility that it was Natalee and wanet to get to other possibilities.

Eager to look into, so eager they begged for donations one day while they were packing to leave at the same time. 

So eager to look into...................eager to follow Richardson's instructions - go out into deeper water, away from the trap.  Yeah - that's the ticket!

Meanwhile - Dutch/Aruban coast guard is at the trap site two days in a row - for a good amount of time.

Coincidence?  ::MonkeyWink::
Jen...Kermit...Has anything been determined on what the Dutch/Aruban coast guard was doing at the cage site? (I think I remember that they were there at the cage on Jan 10, 11?). If so, that was well after the supposedly collection of the contents by the Aruban divers on Jan 7.
Just thinking out loud here, but so much focus has been on the 7th being the day the contents were taken..could that be to distract from what the Dutch/Aruban coast guard were doing on the 10th, 11th? I guess I'm stuck on trying to figure out what the coast guard was doing if the contents were already removed on the 7th... ::MonkeyEek::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #789 1/1/09 -
Post by: Blue Moon on January 03, 2009, 01:16:22 PM
Saying he is Colombian or Venezuelan on Aruba is like saying he is Mexican in California.  ::MonkeyTongue::
Of course there is a connection.. There always is.
These people travel back and forth and do business in these 2 countries ALL the time.
There is no secret connection ..It is a daily connection..  ::MonkeyWink::
Families are intertwined like onion rings in this part of the world.
They should build a monorail system, I am sure it is on Hugo's list of things to build after he takes control of Colombia and the ABC islands..



I guess what I am getting at would it be Jamie who was paid to dispose of the body or would he be someone in his family maybe still living in Columbia that was paid to do it?

Good questions. Blue.  If not that, was the porn operation really Jaime's little business with the rest of the pimps serving as his minions?  Was jaime the 'leader of the pimps" sotospeak?

I guess I haven't thought along the lines of the Pimp business cause I have really thought most of this was drug related (like in the fact that Natalee was given a date-rape drug probably more than should have been given to her).  But I guess the Pimp business, porn videos, drugs all tie in together.  This was a simple crime BUT the underlying reasons for the coverup has nothing to do with a gang rape of a girl named Natalee from Alabama. (JMO)


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #789 1/1/09 -
Post by: SS on January 03, 2009, 01:18:56 PM
* Arlene Ellis-Schipper is a board of directors for CMB bank http://www.cmbnv.com/directors.php
* Paulus van der Sloot went to the CMB bank twice the day after Natalee was kidnapped by his son
* Lincoln Gomez and Nilo Swean are financial guys on the boards of these banks
(I'm going to add to this original post that the banks are significant to follow the money)
http://scaredmonkeys.net/index.php?topic=4186.520


Anita's email was SETAR

Anita van der Sloot email:
> > > > >(i edited) @setarnet.aw

SO IS Gottenbos
Email: ica@setarnet.aw

The 100 million dollars that Croes is talking about is the tax exemption or tax holiday that the refinery currently has. “Setar pays every year 75 million florins in taxes”, said Croes.
http://tinyurl.com/qefda
http://scaredmonkeys.net/index.php?topic=4186.620


If we can unlock what Paulus was doing at that bank,who he spoke with and why?I know it's been gone over a thousand times but it drives me bananas.... ::MonkeyDance::

Truthseeker2!Do you have any lineage on Gomez and Swean??

Sorry, my son just called.  Needed to talk to him.  He left going back to school last night and it's an eight hour drive.


I did some checking on them months ago, but it is on another computer.  They haven't been a main focus for me yet as I was very interested in a particular individual in Colombia with possible Aruban ties. 

I'm sure you will understand, especially after what I have seen here over the last few weeks, until I have complete info I think I'm just going to step back a little and not post so much here.  People have a particular line of thought here and I seem to be a bit disruptive.

But, thanks for the conversation last night.  I do miss the variety of subject matter here, but I understand if most would prefer to stay with the one topic.

Truth, Do you think there are Columbian ties, maybe Paulus paid a Columbian drug dealer to dispose of Natalee's body in the trap? Maybe some truth to a little Joran told Great about the payoff of $10,000 less $400 (the amount Paulus seems to have deposited into the bank for Joran).  Maybe Paulus did make that deposit as well as a withdrawal at the same time.

I thought the $400 dollars was such a round about number?I think i'd take more then $400 dollars for my service! ::MonkeyLaugh::


KTF - the $400 jumped out at me.  People would be killed in a drug deal if the payoff was missing $400.  I just can't accept that it would be an OK thing in a sex slave deal.  I have wondered if Urine has been receiving a blackmail or hush money payoff and the money he has received was short $400.  Could that statement to Greta have been a warning to someone?


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #789 1/1/09 -
Post by: Blue Moon on January 03, 2009, 01:19:52 PM
LDSTLOU,
Again, I think you have failed to follow EVERY detail and words of Kyle himself. Kyle has stated that John S. had NO interest in the trap -- in fact he told Kyle "to never bring up the trap" again! Kyle told Freebirds that John S. has NEW business dealings in Aruba. Beth's brother (private eye) was flabbergasted to find out about the Jan. 7th pics in MARCH! That is NOT IMMEDIATELY. Kyle had no responsibilty to turn over ALL pics????? Well, he sure had responsibility to SELL the pics in February!

John did not believe Natalee was in that trap. They had other targets they had located and he wanted to focus on the other targets that were possibilites. Remember, they identified quite a few other possible targets that they were eager to look into. It wasn't because he was hiding anything in the trap, he felt they had eliminated the possibility that it was Natalee and wanet to get to other possibilities.

Eager to look into, so eager they begged for donations one day while they were packing to leave at the same time. 

So eager to look into...................eager to follow Richardson's instructions - go out into deeper water, away from the trap.  Yeah - that's the ticket!

Meanwhile - Dutch/Aruban coast guard is at the trap site two days in a row - for a good amount of time.

Coincidence?  ::MonkeyWink::
Jen...Kermit...Has anything been determined on what the Dutch/Aruban coast guard was doing at the cage site? (I think I remember that they were there at the cage on Jan 10, 11?). If so, that was well after the supposedly collection of the contents by the Aruban divers on Jan 7.
Just thinking out loud here, but so much focus has been on the 7th being the day the contents were taken..could that be to distract from what the Dutch/Aruban coast guard were doing on the 10th, 11th? I guess I'm stuck on trying to figure out what the coast guard was doing if the contents were already removed on the 7th... ::MonkeyEek::


One other thing I did not understand was the coast guard boarding the boat and Kyle putting up the video of them "showing off" for the camera.  That video showed someone leaving the boat and then they made that "impressive" (NOT) drive by the ship.  I remember we were a little concerned by the boat and Kyle spent time telling us how they were of like minds when it came to Natalee.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #789 1/1/09 -
Post by: SS on January 03, 2009, 01:20:43 PM
Does anyone remember where Daury and Ramona Rodriguez are from....Just Curious? TIA

A google search says he is a 21 year old Aruban.



Ramona is originally from the Dominican Republic, I believe.  Both of them are well cared for right now in NJ prisons.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #789 1/1/09 -
Post by: texasmom on January 03, 2009, 01:21:24 PM
LDSTLOU,
Again, I think you have failed to follow EVERY detail and words of Kyle himself. Kyle has stated that John S. had NO interest in the trap -- in fact he told Kyle "to never bring up the trap" again! Kyle told Freebirds that John S. has NEW business dealings in Aruba. Beth's brother (private eye) was flabbergasted to find out about the Jan. 7th pics in MARCH! That is NOT IMMEDIATELY. Kyle had no responsibilty to turn over ALL pics????? Well, he sure had responsibility to SELL the pics in February!

John did not believe Natalee was in that trap. They had other targets they had located and he wanted to focus on the other targets that were possibilites. Remember, they identified quite a few other possible targets that they were eager to look into. It wasn't because he was hiding anything in the trap, he felt they had eliminated the possibility that it was Natalee and wanet to get to other possibilities.

Eager to look into, so eager they begged for donations one day while they were packing to leave at the same time. 

So eager to look into...................eager to follow Richardson's instructions - go out into deeper water, away from the trap.  Yeah - that's the ticket!

Meanwhile - Dutch/Aruban coast guard is at the trap site two days in a row - for a good amount of time.

Coincidence?  ::MonkeyWink::
Jen...Kermit...Has anything been determined on what the Dutch/Aruban coast guard was doing at the cage site? (I think I remember that they were there at the cage on Jan 10, 11?). If so, that was well after the supposedly collection of the contents by the Aruban divers on Jan 7.
Just thinking out loud here, but so much focus has been on the 7th being the day the contents were taken..could that be to distract from what the Dutch/Aruban coast guard were doing on the 10th, 11th? I guess I'm stuck on trying to figure out what the coast guard was doing if the contents were already removed on the 7th... ::MonkeyEek::


My thoughts on this billb,
In one of Kyle's posts here, he said that talk of obtaining some type of vacuum equipment to sweep around/in the cage for evidence was discussed.  I'm thinking maybe they were there collecting the rest of the evidence other than maybe the entire trap.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #789 1/1/09 -
Post by: Blue Moon on January 03, 2009, 01:22:10 PM
* Arlene Ellis-Schipper is a board of directors for CMB bank http://www.cmbnv.com/directors.php
* Paulus van der Sloot went to the CMB bank twice the day after Natalee was kidnapped by his son
* Lincoln Gomez and Nilo Swean are financial guys on the boards of these banks
(I'm going to add to this original post that the banks are significant to follow the money)
http://scaredmonkeys.net/index.php?topic=4186.520


Anita's email was SETAR

Anita van der Sloot email:
> > > > >(i edited) @setarnet.aw

SO IS Gottenbos
Email: ica@setarnet.aw

The 100 million dollars that Croes is talking about is the tax exemption or tax holiday that the refinery currently has. “Setar pays every year 75 million florins in taxes”, said Croes.
http://tinyurl.com/qefda
http://scaredmonkeys.net/index.php?topic=4186.620


If we can unlock what Paulus was doing at that bank,who he spoke with and why?I know it's been gone over a thousand times but it drives me bananas.... ::MonkeyDance::

Truthseeker2!Do you have any lineage on Gomez and Swean??

Sorry, my son just called.  Needed to talk to him.  He left going back to school last night and it's an eight hour drive.


I did some checking on them months ago, but it is on another computer.  They haven't been a main focus for me yet as I was very interested in a particular individual in Colombia with possible Aruban ties. 

I'm sure you will understand, especially after what I have seen here over the last few weeks, until I have complete info I think I'm just going to step back a little and not post so much here.  People have a particular line of thought here and I seem to be a bit disruptive.

But, thanks for the conversation last night.  I do miss the variety of subject matter here, but I understand if most would prefer to stay with the one topic.

Truth, Do you think there are Columbian ties, maybe Paulus paid a Columbian drug dealer to dispose of Natalee's body in the trap? Maybe some truth to a little Joran told Great about the payoff of $10,000 less $400 (the amount Paulus seems to have deposited into the bank for Joran).  Maybe Paulus did make that deposit as well as a withdrawal at the same time.

I thought the $400 dollars was such a round about number?I think i'd take more then $400 dollars for my service! ::MonkeyLaugh::


KTF - the $400 jumped out at me.  People would be killed in a drug deal if the payoff was missing $400.  I just can't accept that it would be an OK thing in a sex slave deal.  I have wondered if Urine has been receiving a blackmail or hush money payoff and the money he has received was short $400.  Could that statement to Greta have been a warning to someone?

That's what I believe it is.  Also, it could be that Joran was telling "someone" listening to the video he needed MORE money and it better be forthcoming NOW.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #789 1/1/09 -
Post by: truthseeker2 on January 03, 2009, 01:22:21 PM


Yes, I do think there could be a Colombian connection.  I started that line of thinking over a year ago and located an individual there with Aruba ties.  I also thought it odd that three nights in a row you Joran and Deepak admittedly together, but none of those times did they admit being with Freddy or Jaime.  Freddy and Jaime along with the Gottenbos bros. were the closer friends.  The statement given by Jaime is curious because of the timing of the phone calls from Joran.  Also, on 5/30 Jaime ends up at the Wyndham at the same time Andre says Joran and Guido coincidently stepped out of the casino. 

I have often believed they may have been meeting Jaime in the parking lot.

Would the Columbian ties come from Jamie then?  Is Jamie from Columbia and is his family tied into a cartel of some sorts?  (guess most families in Columbia are tied into drugs in some shape or form-guess this is a stupid question on my part).

Yes, he is Colombian.  As for his family...I'm working on that.



Jamie lived with his dad and there were some money problems.  Jamie's mother died before Natalee disappeared.  Joran reported that Jamie's mom was the first dead body that he had seen.

Yeah, I saw that from Joran's book translations.  I think Jaime moved in with his sister.  In his statement they only say he was born in Colombia.  The rest is the school he attended on Aruba.

If the family was having financial issues, extra money from another 'job' could come in handy.  (speculation)


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #789 1/1/09 -
Post by: klaasend on January 03, 2009, 01:22:22 PM
Saying he is Colombian or Venezuelan on Aruba is like saying he is Mexican in California. True
Of course there is a connection.. There always is.
These people travel back and forth and do business in these 2 countries ALL the time.
There is no secret connection ..It is a daily connection..  Never said it was a secret...on Aruba.  Is it all fully understood here, though?  Look how long it took just to figure out some of the names for who we now believe to be important ties to this whole thing.  Lorenzo's name and face were a mystery for a very long time as was Guido's.
Families are intertwined like onion rings in this part of the world.
They should build a monorail system, I am sure it is on Hugo's list of things to build after he takes control of Colombia and the ABC islands..





We have always known Lorenzo's name.  Guido Wever was more effectively hidden in the beginning.  Neither Lorenzo or Guido are Columbian or Venezuelan however.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #789 1/1/09 -
Post by: Keepthefaith on January 03, 2009, 01:23:32 PM
LDSTLOU,
Again, I think you have failed to follow EVERY detail and words of Kyle himself. Kyle has stated that John S. had NO interest in the trap -- in fact he told Kyle "to never bring up the trap" again! Kyle told Freebirds that John S. has NEW business dealings in Aruba. Beth's brother (private eye) was flabbergasted to find out about the Jan. 7th pics in MARCH! That is NOT IMMEDIATELY. Kyle had no responsibilty to turn over ALL pics????? Well, he sure had responsibility to SELL the pics in February!

John did not believe Natalee was in that trap. They had other targets they had located and he wanted to focus on the other targets that were possibilites. Remember, they identified quite a few other possible targets that they were eager to look into. It wasn't because he was hiding anything in the trap, he felt they had eliminated the possibility that it was Natalee and wanet to get to other possibilities.

Eager to look into, so eager they begged for donations one day while they were packing to leave at the same time. 

So eager to look into...................eager to follow Richardson's instructions - go out into deeper water, away from the trap.  Yeah - that's the ticket!

Meanwhile - Dutch/Aruban coast guard is at the trap site two days in a row - for a good amount of time.

Coincidence?  ::MonkeyWink::
Jen...Kermit...Has anything been determined on what the Dutch/Aruban coast guard was doing at the cage site? (I think I remember that they were there at the cage on Jan 10, 11?). If so, that was well after the supposedly collection of the contents by the Aruban divers on Jan 7.
Just thinking out loud here, but so much focus has been on the 7th being the day the contents were taken..could that be to distract from what the Dutch/Aruban coast guard were doing on the 10th, 11th? I guess I'm stuck on trying to figure out what the coast guard was doing if the contents were already removed on the 7th... ::MonkeyEek::


My thoughts on this billb,
In one of Kyle's posts here, he said that talk of obtaining some type of vacuum equipment to sweep around/in the cage for evidence was discussed.  I'm thinking maybe they were there collecting the rest of the evidence other than maybe the entire trap.

Bingo.That was my thought.Wouldn't the Persistence have waited to pump all the sand within a acre or 2 of the cage in a grid like format?


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #789 1/1/09 -
Post by: Keepthefaith on January 03, 2009, 01:26:10 PM
* Arlene Ellis-Schipper is a board of directors for CMB bank http://www.cmbnv.com/directors.php
* Paulus van der Sloot went to the CMB bank twice the day after Natalee was kidnapped by his son
* Lincoln Gomez and Nilo Swean are financial guys on the boards of these banks
(I'm going to add to this original post that the banks are significant to follow the money)
http://scaredmonkeys.net/index.php?topic=4186.520


Anita's email was SETAR

Anita van der Sloot email:
> > > > >(i edited) @setarnet.aw

SO IS Gottenbos
Email: ica@setarnet.aw

The 100 million dollars that Croes is talking about is the tax exemption or tax holiday that the refinery currently has. “Setar pays every year 75 million florins in taxes”, said Croes.
http://tinyurl.com/qefda
http://scaredmonkeys.net/index.php?topic=4186.620


If we can unlock what Paulus was doing at that bank,who he spoke with and why?I know it's been gone over a thousand times but it drives me bananas.... ::MonkeyDance::

Truthseeker2!Do you have any lineage on Gomez and Swean??

Sorry, my son just called.  Needed to talk to him.  He left going back to school last night and it's an eight hour drive.


I did some checking on them months ago, but it is on another computer.  They haven't been a main focus for me yet as I was very interested in a particular individual in Colombia with possible Aruban ties. 

I'm sure you will understand, especially after what I have seen here over the last few weeks, until I have complete info I think I'm just going to step back a little and not post so much here.  People have a particular line of thought here and I seem to be a bit disruptive.

But, thanks for the conversation last night.  I do miss the variety of subject matter here, but I understand if most would prefer to stay with the one topic.

Truth, Do you think there are Columbian ties, maybe Paulus paid a Columbian drug dealer to dispose of Natalee's body in the trap? Maybe some truth to a little Joran told Great about the payoff of $10,000 less $400 (the amount Paulus seems to have deposited into the bank for Joran).  Maybe Paulus did make that deposit as well as a withdrawal at the same time.

I thought the $400 dollars was such a round about number?I think i'd take more then $400 dollars for my service! ::MonkeyLaugh::


KTF - the $400 jumped out at me.  People would be killed in a drug deal if the payoff was missing $400.  I just can't accept that it would be an OK thing in a sex slave deal.  I have wondered if Urine has been receiving a blackmail or hush money payoff and the money he has received was short $400.  Could that statement to Greta have been a warning to someone?

Do we really believe Joran counted every dollar and came to the conclusion that $400 dollars was missing?? ::MonkeyLaugh::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #789 1/1/09 -
Post by: Tamikosmom on January 03, 2009, 01:26:27 PM
GOOD MORNING MONKEYS!!!

Janet
10:25 AM PT


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #789 1/1/09 -
Post by: texasmom on January 03, 2009, 01:27:05 PM
billb, I still wonder why 2 separate days; and less than an hour each day.  Of course that may have just been the times that Kyle witnessed them there from his vantage point on the beach.  Who knows maybe they made several trips out there before and after Kyle reportedly saw them.



Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #789 1/1/09 -
Post by: Keepthefaith on January 03, 2009, 01:27:12 PM
GOOD MORNING MONKEYS!!!

Janet
10:25 AM PT

Good Morning Janet! ::MonkeyCool::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #789 1/1/09 -
Post by: hotping on January 03, 2009, 01:28:26 PM
Does anyone remember where Daury and Ramona Rodriguez are from....Just Curious? TIA

A google search says he is a 21 year old Aruban.



Ramona is originally from the Dominican Republic, I believe.  Both of them are well cared for right now in NJ prisons.
Thanks! Yes They Are!


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #789 1/1/09 -
Post by: texasmom on January 03, 2009, 01:29:02 PM
GOOD MORNING MONKEYS!!!

Janet
10:25 AM PT

Good morning Janet!   ::MonkeyCool::  


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #789 1/1/09 -
Post by: truthseeker2 on January 03, 2009, 01:29:40 PM
Saying he is Colombian or Venezuelan on Aruba is like saying he is Mexican in California.  ::MonkeyTongue::
Of course there is a connection.. There always is.
These people travel back and forth and do business in these 2 countries ALL the time.
There is no secret connection ..It is a daily connection..  ::MonkeyWink::
Families are intertwined like onion rings in this part of the world.
They should build a monorail system, I am sure it is on Hugo's list of things to build after he takes control of Colombia and the ABC islands..



I guess what I am getting at would it be Jamie who was paid to dispose of the body or would he be someone in his family maybe still living in Columbia that was paid to do it?

Good questions. Blue.  If not that, was the porn operation really Jaime's little business with the rest of the pimps serving as his minions?  Was jaime the 'leader of the pimps" sotospeak?

I guess I haven't thought along the lines of the Pimp business cause I have really thought most of this was drug related (like in the fact that Natalee was given a date-rape drug probably more than should have been given to her).  But I guess the Pimp business, porn videos, drugs all tie in together.  This was a simple crime BUT the underlying reasons for the coverup has nothing to do with a gang rape of a girl named Natalee from Alabama. (JMO)

 You may be right, Blue.  The motive for the coverup may have been as simple as well, initially.  But, the magnitude of it now is astonsihing to me.  The entire population of Aruba has been affected by this for a very long time.  For what?  To protect Joran and his father?  A 'simple' crime in that it was not part of something elaborate, but a huge coverup.

You would think at least after the first year they would have realized they had to end this even if they only gave up Joran.  But they didn't.  Are they afraid of Paulus?  I just don't think so.  Joran and Paulus can be proven liars.  Anything they say could be dismissed on Aruba as BS.

The coverup is big.  I hope Brinkman can put at least a dint in it.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #789 1/1/09 -
Post by: billb's daughter on January 03, 2009, 01:32:49 PM
LDSTLOU,
Again, I think you have failed to follow EVERY detail and words of Kyle himself. Kyle has stated that John S. had NO interest in the trap -- in fact he told Kyle "to never bring up the trap" again! Kyle told Freebirds that John S. has NEW business dealings in Aruba. Beth's brother (private eye) was flabbergasted to find out about the Jan. 7th pics in MARCH! That is NOT IMMEDIATELY. Kyle had no responsibilty to turn over ALL pics????? Well, he sure had responsibility to SELL the pics in February!

John did not believe Natalee was in that trap. They had other targets they had located and he wanted to focus on the other targets that were possibilites. Remember, they identified quite a few other possible targets that they were eager to look into. It wasn't because he was hiding anything in the trap, he felt they had eliminated the possibility that it was Natalee and wanet to get to other possibilities.

Eager to look into, so eager they begged for donations one day while they were packing to leave at the same time. 

So eager to look into...................eager to follow Richardson's instructions - go out into deeper water, away from the trap.  Yeah - that's the ticket!

Meanwhile - Dutch/Aruban coast guard is at the trap site two days in a row - for a good amount of time.

Coincidence?  ::MonkeyWink::
Jen...Kermit...Has anything been determined on what the Dutch/Aruban coast guard was doing at the cage site? (I think I remember that they were there at the cage on Jan 10, 11?). If so, that was well after the supposedly collection of the contents by the Aruban divers on Jan 7.
Just thinking out loud here, but so much focus has been on the 7th being the day the contents were taken..could that be to distract from what the Dutch/Aruban coast guard were doing on the 10th, 11th? I guess I'm stuck on trying to figure out what the coast guard was doing if the contents were already removed on the 7th... ::MonkeyEek::


My thoughts on this billb,
In one of Kyle's posts here, he said that talk of obtaining some type of vacuum equipment to sweep around/in the cage for evidence was discussed.  I'm thinking maybe they were there collecting the rest of the evidence other than maybe the entire trap.

Bingo.That was my thought.Wouldn't the Persistence have waited to pump all the sand within a acre or 2 of the cage in a grid like format?
Blue Moon, TM KTF...
Yes..you comments are also some thoughts I'm wondering about. It just seems that they hasn't been any public attention on the coast guard involvement...all the attention has been on the aruban divers on jan7th....
If vacuuming was the motive, I would think more would be made of it, as I believe they could be a LOT of evidence to be shifted out of the sand within a measurable distance around/outside the cage.
I just find it interesting that this hasn't been discussed more....makes be wonder what's up.. ::MonkeyCool::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #789 1/1/09 -
Post by: SS on January 03, 2009, 01:33:09 PM
Saying he is Colombian or Venezuelan on Aruba is like saying he is Mexican in California.  ::MonkeyTongue::
Of course there is a connection.. There always is.
These people travel back and forth and do business in these 2 countries ALL the time.
There is no secret connection ..It is a daily connection..  ::MonkeyWink::
Families are intertwined like onion rings in this part of the world.
They should build a monorail system, I am sure it is on Hugo's list of things to build after he takes control of Colombia and the ABC islands..



I guess what I am getting at would it be Jamie who was paid to dispose of the body or would he be someone in his family maybe still living in Columbia that was paid to do it?

Good questions. Blue.  If not that, was the porn operation really Jaime's little business with the rest of the pimps serving as his minions?  Was jaime the 'leader of the pimps" sotospeak?



I thought the leader was Renfro!  ::MonkeyWink::  ::MonkeyHaHa::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #789 1/1/09 -
Post by: texasmom on January 03, 2009, 01:33:36 PM
Must be a slow day at CnG   ::MonkeyCool::

 ::MonkeyHaHa::

Apparently everyday's a slow day there, they are all here lurking!  Then they draw straws for the next drive by! 

Welcome,  :smt075

 :smt045   


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #789 1/1/09 -
Post by: Tamikosmom on January 03, 2009, 01:34:39 PM
What is wrong with this picture?

Janet

______

JAIME CARRASQUILLA

Joran Van der Sloot
Suspect Statement
June 9, 2005


I did not make an agreement with the girl as to how late I would meet them at Carlos & Charlies. After that I walked outside through the casino and when I got outside I called my father from my mobile phone which has the number "REMOVED" on the mobile phone of my mother. My mother has a mobile phone with the number "REMOVED". I called my father on that phone because my mother was outside of the country and my father had her phone in his possession. When I called my father it was approximately 23.00 hours. I told my father that I was ready and if he could come and pick me up at "Mc Donalds". After that I had called my friend "Jaime CARASQUILLA" on his mobile phone.


Jaime Carrasquilla
Witness Statement
June 17, 2005


On May 29th 2005, between the hours of 16.00 and 19.00, I was called by Joran on my mobile phone with the phone number  .

Joran had asked me whether I wanted to go out with him that night. He told me that a few American girls would go to "Carlos & Charlies" and whether I wanted to meet up with him there


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #789 1/1/09 -
Post by: Edward on January 03, 2009, 01:35:17 PM
She does look like a worn out porn star..  ::MonkeyEek:: ::MonkeyHaHa::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #789 1/1/09 -
Post by: Tamikosmom on January 03, 2009, 01:36:13 PM
Must be a slow day at CnG   ::MonkeyCool::

 ::MonkeyHaHa::

Apparently everyday's a slow day there, they are all here lurking!  Then they draw straws for the next drive by! 


WHAT???


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #789 1/1/09 -
Post by: Blue Moon on January 03, 2009, 01:38:19 PM
I also hope Hero Brinkman can bring about some answers for this family. But he has a lot against him right now and he is not a popular person in the Antilles.  He is stirring the pot and I don't think the powers-that-be in Aruba will allow him to expose anything on that hell-hole island.  This simple crime has to involve the mob, Venezula and Columbia all three cause to me having those 3 involved in this would be a very good reason NOT to expose Joran and Paulus.  And I do agree Paulus is not powerful enough to control this whole investigation and all the people involved in Natalee's murder.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #789 1/1/09 -
Post by: Keepthefaith on January 03, 2009, 01:39:47 PM
LDSTLOU,
Again, I think you have failed to follow EVERY detail and words of Kyle himself. Kyle has stated that John S. had NO interest in the trap -- in fact he told Kyle "to never bring up the trap" again! Kyle told Freebirds that John S. has NEW business dealings in Aruba. Beth's brother (private eye) was flabbergasted to find out about the Jan. 7th pics in MARCH! That is NOT IMMEDIATELY. Kyle had no responsibilty to turn over ALL pics????? Well, he sure had responsibility to SELL the pics in February!

John did not believe Natalee was in that trap. They had other targets they had located and he wanted to focus on the other targets that were possibilites. Remember, they identified quite a few other possible targets that they were eager to look into. It wasn't because he was hiding anything in the trap, he felt they had eliminated the possibility that it was Natalee and wanet to get to other possibilities.

Eager to look into, so eager they begged for donations one day while they were packing to leave at the same time. 

So eager to look into...................eager to follow Richardson's instructions - go out into deeper water, away from the trap.  Yeah - that's the ticket!

Meanwhile - Dutch/Aruban coast guard is at the trap site two days in a row - for a good amount of time.

Coincidence?  ::MonkeyWink::
Jen...Kermit...Has anything been determined on what the Dutch/Aruban coast guard was doing at the cage site? (I think I remember that they were there at the cage on Jan 10, 11?). If so, that was well after the supposedly collection of the contents by the Aruban divers on Jan 7.
Just thinking out loud here, but so much focus has been on the 7th being the day the contents were taken..could that be to distract from what the Dutch/Aruban coast guard were doing on the 10th, 11th? I guess I'm stuck on trying to figure out what the coast guard was doing if the contents were already removed on the 7th... ::MonkeyEek::


My thoughts on this billb,
In one of Kyle's posts here, he said that talk of obtaining some type of vacuum equipment to sweep around/in the cage for evidence was discussed.  I'm thinking maybe they were there collecting the rest of the evidence other than maybe the entire trap.

Bingo.That was my thought.Wouldn't the Persistence have waited to pump all the sand within a acre or 2 of the cage in a grid like format?
Blue Moon, TM KTF...
Yes..you comments are also some thoughts I'm wondering about. It just seems that they hasn't been any public attention on the coast guard involvement...all the attention has been on the aruban divers on jan7th....
If vacuuming was the motive, I would think more would be made of it, as I believe they could be a LOT of evidence to be shifted out of the sand within a measurable distance around/outside the cage.
I just find it interesting that this hasn't been discussed more....makes be wonder what's up.. ::MonkeyCool::

If there weren't remains in that cage why would the coast gaurd be out there?There would be no need correct?


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #789 1/1/09 -
Post by: truthseeker2 on January 03, 2009, 01:40:52 PM
* Arlene Ellis-Schipper is a board of directors for CMB bank http://www.cmbnv.com/directors.php
* Paulus van der Sloot went to the CMB bank twice the day after Natalee was kidnapped by his son
* Lincoln Gomez and Nilo Swean are financial guys on the boards of these banks
(I'm going to add to this original post that the banks are significant to follow the money)
http://scaredmonkeys.net/index.php?topic=4186.520


Anita's email was SETAR

Anita van der Sloot email:
> > > > >(i edited) @setarnet.aw

SO IS Gottenbos
Email: ica@setarnet.aw

The 100 million dollars that Croes is talking about is the tax exemption or tax holiday that the refinery currently has. “Setar pays every year 75 million florins in taxes”, said Croes.
http://tinyurl.com/qefda
http://scaredmonkeys.net/index.php?topic=4186.620


If we can unlock what Paulus was doing at that bank,who he spoke with and why?I know it's been gone over a thousand times but it drives me bananas.... ::MonkeyDance::

Truthseeker2!Do you have any lineage on Gomez and Swean??

Sorry, my son just called.  Needed to talk to him.  He left going back to school last night and it's an eight hour drive.


I did some checking on them months ago, but it is on another computer.  They haven't been a main focus for me yet as I was very interested in a particular individual in Colombia with possible Aruban ties. 

I'm sure you will understand, especially after what I have seen here over the last few weeks, until I have complete info I think I'm just going to step back a little and not post so much here.  People have a particular line of thought here and I seem to be a bit disruptive.

But, thanks for the conversation last night.  I do miss the variety of subject matter here, but I understand if most would prefer to stay with the one topic.

Truth, Do you think there are Columbian ties, maybe Paulus paid a Columbian drug dealer to dispose of Natalee's body in the trap? Maybe some truth to a little Joran told Great about the payoff of $10,000 less $400 (the amount Paulus seems to have deposited into the bank for Joran).  Maybe Paulus did make that deposit as well as a withdrawal at the same time.

I thought the $400 dollars was such a round about number?I think i'd take more then $400 dollars for my service! ::MonkeyLaugh::


KTF - the $400 jumped out at me.  People would be killed in a drug deal if the payoff was missing $400.  I just can't accept that it would be an OK thing in a sex slave deal.  I have wondered if Urine has been receiving a blackmail or hush money payoff and the money he has received was short $400.  Could that statement to Greta have been a warning to someone?

Do we really believe Joran counted every dollar and came to the conclusion that $400 dollars was missing?? ::MonkeyLaugh::

LOL.  I don't.  But, the fact that amount comes up often is curious to me.  It's in Andre's statement and he used it with Greta.  Andre's statement says after winning about $400US Joran immediately cashes in his chips.  Joran says he cashed in because Andrea and Deepak said they were not having fun anymore.  That is not what Andre said.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #789 1/1/09 -
Post by: Blue Moon on January 03, 2009, 01:42:58 PM
Does anyone remember where Daury and Ramona Rodriguez are from....Just Curious? TIA

A google search says he is a 21 year old Aruban.



Ramona is originally from the Dominican Republic, I believe.  Both of them are well cared for right now in NJ prisons.
Thanks! Yes They Are!

His Member page (don't know if it is a myspace page) says he is from Columbia.

http://www.partypeeps2000.com/members/DRzzz.aspx


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #789 1/1/09 -
Post by: billb's daughter on January 03, 2009, 01:43:47 PM
LDSTLOU,
Again, I think you have failed to follow EVERY detail and words of Kyle himself. Kyle has stated that John S. had NO interest in the trap -- in fact he told Kyle "to never bring up the trap" again! Kyle told Freebirds that John S. has NEW business dealings in Aruba. Beth's brother (private eye) was flabbergasted to find out about the Jan. 7th pics in MARCH! That is NOT IMMEDIATELY. Kyle had no responsibilty to turn over ALL pics????? Well, he sure had responsibility to SELL the pics in February!

John did not believe Natalee was in that trap. They had other targets they had located and he wanted to focus on the other targets that were possibilites. Remember, they identified quite a few other possible targets that they were eager to look into. It wasn't because he was hiding anything in the trap, he felt they had eliminated the possibility that it was Natalee and wanet to get to other possibilities.

Eager to look into, so eager they begged for donations one day while they were packing to leave at the same time. 

So eager to look into...................eager to follow Richardson's instructions - go out into deeper water, away from the trap.  Yeah - that's the ticket!

Meanwhile - Dutch/Aruban coast guard is at the trap site two days in a row - for a good amount of time.

Coincidence?  ::MonkeyWink::
Jen...Kermit...Has anything been determined on what the Dutch/Aruban coast guard was doing at the cage site? (I think I remember that they were there at the cage on Jan 10, 11?). If so, that was well after the supposedly collection of the contents by the Aruban divers on Jan 7.
Just thinking out loud here, but so much focus has been on the 7th being the day the contents were taken..could that be to distract from what the Dutch/Aruban coast guard were doing on the 10th, 11th? I guess I'm stuck on trying to figure out what the coast guard was doing if the contents were already removed on the 7th... ::MonkeyEek::


My thoughts on this billb,
In one of Kyle's posts here, he said that talk of obtaining some type of vacuum equipment to sweep around/in the cage for evidence was discussed.  I'm thinking maybe they were there collecting the rest of the evidence other than maybe the entire trap.

Bingo.That was my thought.Wouldn't the Persistence have waited to pump all the sand within a acre or 2 of the cage in a grid like format?
Blue Moon, TM KTF...
Yes..you comments are also some thoughts I'm wondering about. It just seems that they hasn't been any public attention on the coast guard involvement...all the attention has been on the aruban divers on jan7th....
If vacuuming was the motive, I would think more would be made of it, as I believe they could be a LOT of evidence to be shifted out of the sand within a measurable distance around/outside the cage.
I just find it interesting that this hasn't been discussed more....makes be wonder what's up.. ::MonkeyCool::

If there weren't remains in that cage why would the coast gaurd be out there?There would be no need correct?
Correct.....another thought...this is the DUTCH coast guard....aruba doesn't have their own. Ties the DUTCH more directly into the happenings surrounding the cage.... imho
Who is directing the DUTCH coast guard? I don't know....


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #789 1/1/09 -
Post by: truthseeker2 on January 03, 2009, 01:44:37 PM
Saying he is Colombian or Venezuelan on Aruba is like saying he is Mexican in California.  ::MonkeyTongue::
Of course there is a connection.. There always is.
These people travel back and forth and do business in these 2 countries ALL the time.
There is no secret connection ..It is a daily connection..  ::MonkeyWink::
Families are intertwined like onion rings in this part of the world.
They should build a monorail system, I am sure it is on Hugo's list of things to build after he takes control of Colombia and the ABC islands..



I guess what I am getting at would it be Jamie who was paid to dispose of the body or would he be someone in his family maybe still living in Columbia that was paid to do it?

Good questions. Blue.  If not that, was the porn operation really Jaime's little business with the rest of the pimps serving as his minions?  Was jaime the 'leader of the pimps" sotospeak?



I thought the leader was Renfro!  ::MonkeyWink::  ::MonkeyHaHa::

LOL.  Julia couldn't run an automatic dishwasher, much less a covert porn operation.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #789 1/1/09 -
Post by: bleachedblack on January 03, 2009, 01:44:53 PM
Does this look like Ramona Rodriguez? Only one I see in the NJ system, but it might be from a prior arrest.

(https://www6.state.nj.us/DOC_Inmate/photo?id=1176867)


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #789 1/1/09 -
Post by: Blue Moon on January 03, 2009, 01:46:24 PM
Does this look like Ramona Rodriguez? Only one I see in the NJ system, but it might be from a prior arrest.

(https://www6.state.nj.us/DOC_Inmate/photo?id=1176867)

It doesn't look like her to me.  I thought the picture from a newspaper we saw here showed her as being rather "plump".


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #789 1/1/09 -
Post by: billb's daughter on January 03, 2009, 01:46:34 PM
Gotta run...bbl..
It is nice to see multiple discussions all going on at the same time w/o attacks on posters...Monkeys can multitask and be nice to each other...lol ::cartwheel:: ::cartwheel::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #789 1/1/09 -
Post by: texasmom on January 03, 2009, 01:47:38 PM
LDSTLOU,
Again, I think you have failed to follow EVERY detail and words of Kyle himself. Kyle has stated that John S. had NO interest in the trap -- in fact he told Kyle "to never bring up the trap" again! Kyle told Freebirds that John S. has NEW business dealings in Aruba. Beth's brother (private eye) was flabbergasted to find out about the Jan. 7th pics in MARCH! That is NOT IMMEDIATELY. Kyle had no responsibilty to turn over ALL pics????? Well, he sure had responsibility to SELL the pics in February!

John did not believe Natalee was in that trap. They had other targets they had located and he wanted to focus on the other targets that were possibilites. Remember, they identified quite a few other possible targets that they were eager to look into. It wasn't because he was hiding anything in the trap, he felt they had eliminated the possibility that it was Natalee and wanet to get to other possibilities.

Eager to look into, so eager they begged for donations one day while they were packing to leave at the same time. 

So eager to look into...................eager to follow Richardson's instructions - go out into deeper water, away from the trap.  Yeah - that's the ticket!

Meanwhile - Dutch/Aruban coast guard is at the trap site two days in a row - for a good amount of time.

Coincidence?  ::MonkeyWink::
Jen...Kermit...Has anything been determined on what the Dutch/Aruban coast guard was doing at the cage site? (I think I remember that they were there at the cage on Jan 10, 11?). If so, that was well after the supposedly collection of the contents by the Aruban divers on Jan 7.
Just thinking out loud here, but so much focus has been on the 7th being the day the contents were taken..could that be to distract from what the Dutch/Aruban coast guard were doing on the 10th, 11th? I guess I'm stuck on trying to figure out what the coast guard was doing if the contents were already removed on the 7th... ::MonkeyEek::


My thoughts on this billb,
In one of Kyle's posts here, he said that talk of obtaining some type of vacuum equipment to sweep around/in the cage for evidence was discussed.  I'm thinking maybe they were there collecting the rest of the evidence other than maybe the entire trap.

Bingo.That was my thought.Wouldn't the Persistence have waited to pump all the sand within a acre or 2 of the cage in a grid like format?
Blue Moon, TM KTF...
Yes..you comments are also some thoughts I'm wondering about. It just seems that they hasn't been any public attention on the coast guard involvement...all the attention has been on the aruban divers on jan7th....
If vacuuming was the motive, I would think more would be made of it, as I believe they could be a LOT of evidence to be shifted out of the sand within a measurable distance around/outside the cage.
I just find it interesting that this hasn't been discussed more....makes be wonder what's up.. ::MonkeyCool::

If there weren't remains in that cage why would the coast gaurd be out there?There would be no need correct?
Correct.....another thought...this is the DUTCH coast guard....aruba doesn't have their own. Ties the DUTCH more directly into the happenings surrounding the cage.... imho
Who is directing the DUTCH coast guard? I don't know....

Again, just my thoughts.  I thought maybe this could be why putting pressure "more importantly on the Hague" was so important.  JMO


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #789 1/1/09 -
Post by: Keepthefaith on January 03, 2009, 01:47:43 PM
Gotta run...bbl..
It is nice to see multiple discussions all going on at the same time w/o attacks on posters...Monkeys can multitask and be nice to each other...lol ::cartwheel:: ::cartwheel::

 ::MonkeyLaugh::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #789 1/1/09 -
Post by: hotping on January 03, 2009, 01:50:28 PM
Does this look like Ramona Rodriguez? Only one I see in the NJ system, but it might be from a prior arrest.

(https://www6.state.nj.us/DOC_Inmate/photo?id=1176867)
I don't know if that is Her or not....I do know that there was another Ramona Rodriguez that was released on parole from the state of New Jersey...and that She is not the same as the one connected to Daury.... The one connected to Daury is still incarcerated....


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #789 1/1/09 -
Post by: texasmom on January 03, 2009, 01:50:58 PM
Must be a slow day at CnG   ::MonkeyCool::

 ::MonkeyHaHa::

Apparently everyday's a slow day there, they are all here lurking!  Then they draw straws for the next drive by! 


WHAT???

I didn't miss this Janet, just wasn't sure what you're asking.   

I was just being a little mischievious before you were here, I promise to be good now (or I'll really try to be).   ::MonkeyWink::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #789 1/1/09 -
Post by: truthseeker2 on January 03, 2009, 01:51:15 PM
What is wrong with this picture?

Janet

______

JAIME CARRASQUILLA

Joran Van der Sloot
Suspect Statement
June 9, 2005


I did not make an agreement with the girl as to how late I would meet them at Carlos & Charlies. After that I walked outside through the casino and when I got outside I called my father from my mobile phone which has the number "REMOVED" on the mobile phone of my mother. My mother has a mobile phone with the number "REMOVED". I called my father on that phone because my mother was outside of the country and my father had her phone in his possession. When I called my father it was approximately 23.00 hours. I told my father that I was ready and if he could come and pick me up at "Mc Donalds". After that I had called my friend "Jaime CARASQUILLA" on his mobile phone.


Jaime Carrasquilla
Witness Statement
June 17, 2005


On May 29th 2005, between the hours of 16.00 and 19.00, I was called by Joran on my mobile phone with the phone number  .

Joran had asked me whether I wanted to go out with him that night. He told me that a few American girls would go to "Carlos & Charlies" and whether I wanted to meet up with him there


11:00 - 11:15 on 5/30/05

Jaime goes to pick up his father at the Wyndham. (6/17 statement)  Deepak calls Joran for the second time that night. (6/13 statement)  Joran says in his 6/16 statement he and Guido are at the Aruba Grand.  Deepak says in his 06/13 statement that Joran tells him they are at the Radisson.  Andre (statement 06/20) is still at the Wyndham, calls Joran and Joran says he and Guido are at the Radisson.

Andre Dos Santos 6/20/05:
I saw then that "Guido WEAVER" came into the Casa Blanca casino of the Wyndham hotel and walked up to Joran. I no longer remember what time Guido WEAVER arrives at the casino. Because Joran and Guido wanted to play a “live game”, they told me they went to Joran’s house to pick up money to gamble with. I no longer remember how Guido was dressed. I saw that Joran and Guido then went outside.


Joran 6/14/05:
At approximately 22.30, Guido arrived at the Wyndham Casino. Guido and myself went for a circular walk. After that Guido and myself walked to his car. His car was in the parking lot of the Wyndham Hotel.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #789 1/1/09 -
Post by: Anna on January 03, 2009, 01:52:38 PM
Aruba has it's own Coast Guard.  It is Rudy Croes "baby" and he is angry that Jan vd Straten made remarks about it.  That is supposedly what got the two at odds with each other in the first place.



Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #789 1/1/09 -
Post by: truthseeker2 on January 03, 2009, 01:52:53 PM


11:00 - 11:15 on 5/30/05

Jaime goes to pick up his father at the Wyndham. (6/17 statement)  Deepak calls Joran for the second time that night. (6/13 statement)  Joran says in his 6/16  statement he and Guido are at the Aruba Grand.  Deepak says in his 06/13 statement that Joran tells him they are at the Radisson.  Andre (statement 06/20) is still at the Wyndham, calls Joran and Joran says he and Guido are at the Radisson.

Andre Dos Santos 6/20/05:
I saw then that "Guido WEAVER" came into the Casa Blanca casino of the Wyndham hotel and walked up to Joran. I no longer remember what time Guido WEAVER arrives at the casino. Because Joran and Guido wanted to play a “live game”, they told me they went to Joran’s house to pick up money to gamble with. I no longer remember how Guido was dressed. I saw that Joran and Guido then went outside.


Joran 6/14/05:
At approximately 22.30, Guido arrived at the Wyndham Casino. Guido and myself went for a circular walk. After that Guido and myself walked to his car. His car was in the parking lot of the Wyndham Hotel.

6/16 should be 6/14


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #789 1/1/09 -
Post by: Rob on January 03, 2009, 01:53:24 PM


Yes, I do think there could be a Colombian connection.  I started that line of thinking over a year ago and located an individual there with Aruba ties.  I also thought it odd that three nights in a row you Joran and Deepak admittedly together, but none of those times did they admit being with Freddy or Jaime.  Freddy and Jaime along with the Gottenbos bros. were the closer friends.  The statement given by Jaime is curious because of the timing of the phone calls from Joran.  Also, on 5/30 Jaime ends up at the Wyndham at the same time Andre says Joran and Guido coincidently stepped out of the casino. 

I have often believed they may have been meeting Jaime in the parking lot.

Would the Columbian ties come from Jamie then?  Is Jamie from Columbia and is his family tied into a cartel of some sorts?  (guess most families in Columbia are tied into drugs in some shape or form-guess this is a stupid question on my part).

Yes, he is Colombian.  As for his family...I'm working on that.



Jamie lived with his dad and there were some money problems.  Jamie's mother died before Natalee disappeared.  Joran reported that Jamie's mom was the first dead body that he had seen.

also interesting that he didn't say it was the ONLY dead body he had seen. how many 17 year olds see multiple dead bodies?


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #789 1/1/09 -
Post by: klaasend on January 03, 2009, 01:53:33 PM
Does this look like Ramona Rodriguez? Only one I see in the NJ system, but it might be from a prior arrest.

(https://www6.state.nj.us/DOC_Inmate/photo?id=1176867)

It doesn't look like her to me.  I thought the picture from a newspaper we saw here showed her as being rather "plump".

Doesn't look like her to me.  See the pic at this link:

http://scaredmonkeys.net/index.php?topic=2783.0


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #789 1/1/09 -
Post by: hotping on January 03, 2009, 01:53:59 PM
Does anyone remember where Daury and Ramona Rodriguez are from....Just Curious? TIA

A google search says he is a 21 year old Aruban.



Ramona is originally from the Dominican Republic, I believe.  Both of them are well cared for right now in NJ prisons.
Thanks! Yes They Are!

His Member page (don't know if it is a myspace page) says he is from Columbia.

http://www.partypeeps2000.com/members/DRzzz.aspx
Thank You Again!


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #789 1/1/09 -
Post by: Keepthefaith on January 03, 2009, 01:55:40 PM
So!Did Paulus get the 10'000 grand to pay Jaime and Joran took $400 dollars?Am i way off?


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #789 1/1/09 -
Post by: truthseeker2 on January 03, 2009, 01:58:14 PM


Yes, I do think there could be a Colombian connection.  I started that line of thinking over a year ago and located an individual there with Aruba ties.  I also thought it odd that three nights in a row you Joran and Deepak admittedly together, but none of those times did they admit being with Freddy or Jaime.  Freddy and Jaime along with the Gottenbos bros. were the closer friends.  The statement given by Jaime is curious because of the timing of the phone calls from Joran.  Also, on 5/30 Jaime ends up at the Wyndham at the same time Andre says Joran and Guido coincidently stepped out of the casino. 

I have often believed they may have been meeting Jaime in the parking lot.

Would the Columbian ties come from Jamie then?  Is Jamie from Columbia and is his family tied into a cartel of some sorts?  (guess most families in Columbia are tied into drugs in some shape or form-guess this is a stupid question on my part).

Yes, he is Colombian.  As for his family...I'm working on that.



Jamie lived with his dad and there were some money problems.  Jamie's mother died before Natalee disappeared.  Joran reported that Jamie's mom was the first dead body that he had seen.

also interesting that he didn't say it was the ONLY dead body he had seen. how many 17 year olds see multiple dead bodies?

No, he didn't, did he?  At 17 I had only seen one, my grandfather.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #789 1/1/09 -
Post by: bleachedblack on January 03, 2009, 02:00:49 PM
Nah, you are right, doesn't look like her to me either. going back to see if I can find her in the system-maybe a smaller prison.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #789 1/1/09 -
Post by: truthseeker2 on January 03, 2009, 02:01:56 PM
So!Did Paulus get the 10'000 grand to pay Jaime and Joran took $400 dollars?Am i way off?

I don't know if the $10,000 buying/selling of Natalee really happened.  In listening to Joran's interview with Greta the $400 stuck out to me from Anfre's statement.  I think Andre had more information and did not know it was information.  i think he was the guy Joran went around with when he wanted to be seen in a good light.  He was with Andre on 5/29 and on 5/30.  Yet, I don't wee where the others include Andre in therelist of close friends when looking at the PV's.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #789 1/1/09 -
Post by: Keepthefaith on January 03, 2009, 02:03:15 PM
So!Did Paulus get the 10'000 grand to pay Jaime and Joran took $400 dollars?Am i way off?

I don't know if the $10,000 buying/selling of Natalee really happened.  In listening to Joran's interview with Greta the $400 stuck out to me from Anfre's statement.  I think Andre had more information and did not know it was information.  i think he was the guy Joran went around with when he wanted to be seen in a good light.  He was with Andre on 5/29 and on 5/30.  Yet, I don't wee where the others include Andre in therelist of close friends when looking at the PV's.

Not buying and selling but disposing? ::MonkeyConfused::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #789 1/1/09 -
Post by: Rob on January 03, 2009, 02:03:30 PM
So!Did Paulus get the 10'000 grand to pay Jaime and Joran took $400 dollars?Am i way off?

I'm thinking Paulus took 10k outta CMB, gave someone (the Colombians) $9600 (guilders, florins, dollars??) whatever that amount really was... took four hundred (G,F, USDs) and redeposited it as a way to make it look like Joran had won something.

I think the reason the disposal people / person have not really be identified is because they are, well, unidentifiable at this time. We know everyone on Aruba and I really can't see Paulus being soooo stoopid as to allow the Gottenbos goons to handle this... someone else did it in my opinion. Those Gottenbos kids don't look like they can date rape juice someone AND get them into the car all at the same time. Nope, it's not them in my opinion. The body was disappeared too well, and by someone who can't or won't talk - that eliminates those two in my mind.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #789 1/1/09 -
Post by: hotping on January 03, 2009, 02:03:42 PM
Nah, you are right, doesn't look like her to me either. going back to see if I can find her in the system-maybe a smaller prison.
BB I believe Ramona is still in a county jail.....Her pic probably is not in the prison system....Not Yet Anyways...lol  ::MonkeyWink::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #789 1/1/09 -
Post by: truthseeker2 on January 03, 2009, 02:03:43 PM
So!Did Paulus get the 10'000 grand to pay Jaime and Joran took $400 dollars?Am i way off?

I don't know if the $10,000 buying/selling of Natalee really happened.  In listening to Joran's interview with Greta the $400 stuck out to me from Anfre's statement.  I think Andre had more information and did not know it was information.  i think he was the guy Joran went around with when he wanted to be seen in a good light.  He was with Andre on 5/29 and on 5/30.  Yet, I don't wee where the others include Andre in therelist of close friends when looking at the PV's.

Sorry about all the typos.  I'm watching the news about Israel on Fox right now and typing at the same time.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #789 1/1/09 -
Post by: truthseeker2 on January 03, 2009, 02:06:01 PM
So!Did Paulus get the 10'000 grand to pay Jaime and Joran took $400 dollars?Am i way off?

I don't know if the $10,000 buying/selling of Natalee really happened.  In listening to Joran's interview with Greta the $400 stuck out to me from Anfre's statement.  I think Andre had more information and did not know it was information.  i think he was the guy Joran went around with when he wanted to be seen in a good light.  He was with Andre on 5/29 and on 5/30.  Yet, I don't wee where the others include Andre in therelist of close friends when looking at the PV's.

Not buying and selling but disposing? ::MonkeyConfused::

Don't know yet.  If it WAS a trafficking issue and dumbazz Joran took some for himself, he may have been out there trying to recoup it before they cut his hand off.  Jaime showing up to collect it?

If not, Joran seems to have a fetish about that amount.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #789 1/1/09 -
Post by: Blue Moon on January 03, 2009, 02:07:11 PM
So!Did Paulus get the 10'000 grand to pay Jaime and Joran took $400 dollars?Am i way off?

I'm thinking Paulus took 10k outta CMB, gave someone (the Colombians) $9600 (guilders, florins, dollars??) whatever that amount really was... took four hundred (G,F, USDs) and redeposited it as a way to make it look like Joran had won something.

I think the reason the disposal people / person have not really be identified is because they are, well, unidentifiable at this time. We know everyone on Aruba and I really can't see Paulus being soooo stoopid as to allow the Gottenbos goons to handle this... someone else did it in my opinion. Those Gottenbos kids don't look like they can date rape juice someone AND get them into the car all at the same time. Nope, it's not them in my opinion. The body was disappeared too well, and by someone who can't or won't talk - that eliminates those two in my mind.

So would Paulus be so stupid to arrange the disposal himself or would he allow Godfather Jan to do that.  Jan was over drugs and he could have better arranged a disposal for Joran and Paulus and Paulus supplied the payoff.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #789 1/1/09 -
Post by: Keepthefaith on January 03, 2009, 02:07:58 PM
So!Did Paulus get the 10'000 grand to pay Jaime and Joran took $400 dollars?Am i way off?

I'm thinking Paulus took 10k outta CMB, gave someone (the Colombians) $9600 (guilders, florins, dollars??) whatever that amount really was... took four hundred (G,F, USDs) and redeposited it as a way to make it look like Joran had won something.

I think the reason the disposal people / person have not really be identified is because they are, well, unidentifiable at this time. We know everyone on Aruba and I really can't see Paulus being soooo stoopid as to allow the Gottenbos goons to handle this... someone else did it in my opinion. Those Gottenbos kids don't look like they can date rape juice someone AND get them into the car all at the same time. Nope, it's not them in my opinion. The body was disappeared too well, and by someone who can't or won't talk - that eliminates those two in my mind.

Thanx Rob.Still trying to understand Jossy and Eduardo.Anything on that front?


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #789 1/1/09 -
Post by: Slogger on January 03, 2009, 02:08:15 PM
Aruba has it's own Coast Guard.  It is Rudy Croes "baby" and he is angry that Jan vd Straten made remarks about it.  That is supposedly what got the two at odds with each other in the first place.



Yes.  IIRC, the Head of the Coast Guard became a Head of the Polis.  (Peter whatzis, with a name similar to one of the 2 Judges in question?)


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #789 1/1/09 -
Post by: truthseeker2 on January 03, 2009, 02:09:05 PM
So!Did Paulus get the 10'000 grand to pay Jaime and Joran took $400 dollars?Am i way off?

I'm thinking Paulus took 10k outta CMB, gave someone (the Colombians) $9600 (guilders, florins, dollars??) whatever that amount really was... took four hundred (G,F, USDs) and redeposited it as a way to make it look like Joran had won something.

I think the reason the disposal people / person have not really be identified is because they are, well, unidentifiable at this time. We know everyone on Aruba and I really can't see Paulus being soooo stoopid as to allow the Gottenbos goons to handle this... someone else did it in my opinion. Those Gottenbos kids don't look like they can date rape juice someone AND get them into the car all at the same time. Nope, it's not them in my opinion. The body was disappeared too well, and by someone who can't or won't talk - that eliminates those two in my mind.

So many people have come and 'gone' on Aruba since then.  Finding the disposers may never happen.  Finding who engaged them in the task...Paulus is a good a suspect as anyone.  The number one suspect.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #789 1/1/09 -
Post by: Rob on January 03, 2009, 02:10:00 PM
So!Did Paulus get the 10'000 grand to pay Jaime and Joran took $400 dollars?Am i way off?

I'm thinking Paulus took 10k outta CMB, gave someone (the Colombians) $9600 (guilders, florins, dollars??) whatever that amount really was... took four hundred (G,F, USDs) and redeposited it as a way to make it look like Joran had won something.

I think the reason the disposal people / person have not really be identified is because they are, well, unidentifiable at this time. We know everyone on Aruba and I really can't see Paulus being soooo stoopid as to allow the Gottenbos goons to handle this... someone else did it in my opinion. Those Gottenbos kids don't look like they can date rape juice someone AND get them into the car all at the same time. Nope, it's not them in my opinion. The body was disappeared too well, and by someone who can't or won't talk - that eliminates those two in my mind.

So would Paulus be so stupid to arrange the disposal himself or would he allow Godfather Jan to do that.  Jan was over drugs and he could have better arranged a disposal for Joran and Paulus and Paulus supplied the payoff.

Paulus was arrested fer premeditated murder. I think he is more than capable of making a body disappear. Jan is involved in the cover-up to exculpate the son of his friend. Jan didn't do it - magic 8 balls points to Paulus.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #789 1/1/09 -
Post by: Rob on January 03, 2009, 02:12:00 PM
So!Did Paulus get the 10'000 grand to pay Jaime and Joran took $400 dollars?Am i way off?

I'm thinking Paulus took 10k outta CMB, gave someone (the Colombians) $9600 (guilders, florins, dollars??) whatever that amount really was... took four hundred (G,F, USDs) and redeposited it as a way to make it look like Joran had won something.

I think the reason the disposal people / person have not really be identified is because they are, well, unidentifiable at this time. We know everyone on Aruba and I really can't see Paulus being soooo stoopid as to allow the Gottenbos goons to handle this... someone else did it in my opinion. Those Gottenbos kids don't look like they can date rape juice someone AND get them into the car all at the same time. Nope, it's not them in my opinion. The body was disappeared too well, and by someone who can't or won't talk - that eliminates those two in my mind.

Thanx Rob.Still trying to understand Jossy and Eduardo.Anything on that front?

no clue - sorry. KTF, ask Jen and Wingnut - they know, not me. I haven't been over there in 18 months or more.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #789 1/1/09 -
Post by: Rob on January 03, 2009, 02:12:54 PM
Aruba has it's own Coast Guard.  It is Rudy Croes "baby" and he is angry that Jan vd Straten made remarks about it.  That is supposedly what got the two at odds with each other in the first place.



Yes.  IIRC, the Head of the Coast Guard became a Head of the Polis.  (Peter whatzis, with a name similar to one of the 2 Judges in question?)

DeWitte


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #789 1/1/09 -
Post by: Slogger on January 03, 2009, 02:13:32 PM
LDSTLOU,
Again, I think you have failed to follow EVERY detail and words of Kyle himself. Kyle has stated that John S. had NO interest in the trap -- in fact he told Kyle "to never bring up the trap" again! Kyle told Freebirds that John S. has NEW business dealings in Aruba. Beth's brother (private eye) was flabbergasted to find out about the Jan. 7th pics in MARCH! That is NOT IMMEDIATELY. Kyle had no responsibilty to turn over ALL pics????? Well, he sure had responsibility to SELL the pics in February!

John did not believe Natalee was in that trap. They had other targets they had located and he wanted to focus on the other targets that were possibilites. Remember, they identified quite a few other possible targets that they were eager to look into. It wasn't because he was hiding anything in the trap, he felt they had eliminated the possibility that it was Natalee and wanet to get to other possibilities.

Eager to look into, so eager they begged for donations one day while they were packing to leave at the same time. 

So eager to look into...................eager to follow Richardson's instructions - go out into deeper water, away from the trap.  Yeah - that's the ticket!

Meanwhile - Dutch/Aruban coast guard is at the trap site two days in a row - for a good amount of time.

Coincidence?  ::MonkeyWink::
Jen...Kermit...Has anything been determined on what the Dutch/Aruban coast guard was doing at the cage site? (I think I remember that they were there at the cage on Jan 10, 11?). If so, that was well after the supposedly collection of the contents by the Aruban divers on Jan 7.
Just thinking out loud here, but so much focus has been on the 7th being the day the contents were taken..could that be to distract from what the Dutch/Aruban coast guard were doing on the 10th, 11th? I guess I'm stuck on trying to figure out what the coast guard was doing if the contents were already removed on the 7th... ::MonkeyEek::


My thoughts on this billb,
In one of Kyle's posts here, he said that talk of obtaining some type of vacuum equipment to sweep around/in the cage for evidence was discussed.  I'm thinking maybe they were there collecting the rest of the evidence other than maybe the entire trap.

Bingo.That was my thought.Wouldn't the Persistence have waited to pump all the sand within a acre or 2 of the cage in a grid like format?
Blue Moon, TM KTF...
Yes..you comments are also some thoughts I'm wondering about. It just seems that they hasn't been any public attention on the coast guard involvement...all the attention has been on the aruban divers on jan7th....
If vacuuming was the motive, I would think more would be made of it, as I believe they could be a LOT of evidence to be shifted out of the sand within a measurable distance around/outside the cage.
I just find it interesting that this hasn't been discussed more....makes be wonder what's up.. ::MonkeyCool::

There was discussion of obtaining equipment to vacuum the sand.  Then the Coast Guard sits over the site for 2 days.  Seems like they may have obtained the equipment, vacuumed the sand.

The question would be:  Did they sift through it to obtain evidence or fill their container and take to a dump site, unknown forever.  (This is assuming that's what the Coast Guard was doing on the spot for 2 days.)


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #789 1/1/09 -
Post by: Keepthefaith on January 03, 2009, 02:15:11 PM
So!Did Paulus get the 10'000 grand to pay Jaime and Joran took $400 dollars?Am i way off?

I'm thinking Paulus took 10k outta CMB, gave someone (the Colombians) $9600 (guilders, florins, dollars??) whatever that amount really was... took four hundred (G,F, USDs) and redeposited it as a way to make it look like Joran had won something.

I think the reason the disposal people / person have not really be identified is because they are, well, unidentifiable at this time. We know everyone on Aruba and I really can't see Paulus being soooo stoopid as to allow the Gottenbos goons to handle this... someone else did it in my opinion. Those Gottenbos kids don't look like they can date rape juice someone AND get them into the car all at the same time. Nope, it's not them in my opinion. The body was disappeared too well, and by someone who can't or won't talk - that eliminates those two in my mind.

Thanx Rob.Still trying to understand Jossy and Eduardo.Anything on that front?

no clue - sorry. KTF, ask Jen and Wingnut - they know, not me. I haven't been over there in 18 months or more.

Thanx Rob!


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #789 1/1/09 -
Post by: Slogger on January 03, 2009, 02:17:48 PM
Aruba has it's own Coast Guard.  It is Rudy Croes "baby" and he is angry that Jan vd Straten made remarks about it.  That is supposedly what got the two at odds with each other in the first place.



Yes.  IIRC, the Head of the Coast Guard became a Head of the Polis.  (Peter whatzis, with a name similar to one of the 2 Judges in question?)

DeWitte

Thanks, Rob.

Do we have coordination of ALE and Coast Guard, and for what?  Nothing they've done (so far) has been good, or helpful.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #789 1/1/09 -
Post by: bleachedblack on January 03, 2009, 02:18:16 PM
Nah, you are right, doesn't look like her to me either. going back to see if I can find her in the system-maybe a smaller prison.
BB I believe Ramona is still in a county jail.....Her pic probably is not in the prison system....Not Yet Anyways...lol  ::MonkeyWink::

Could be.....and some of the county jails I am checking haven't updated their info since 1/08.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #789 1/1/09 -
Post by: billb's daughter on January 03, 2009, 02:20:41 PM
Aruba has it's own Coast Guard.  It is Rudy Croes "baby" and he is angry that Jan vd Straten made remarks about it.  That is supposedly what got the two at odds with each other in the first place.



Yes.  IIRC, the Head of the Coast Guard became a Head of the Polis.  (Peter whatzis, with a name similar to one of the 2 Judges in question?)
OK..I stand corrected about aruba not having it's own coast guard....
But I believe it chain of command is to the Royal Netherlands Navy:
http://books.google.com/books?id=5iDJCTRvNjEC&pg=PA503&lpg=PA503&dq=aruban+coast+guard&source=web&ots=8jQZk7mKKa&sig=MU5LhehZUFa-Mg0zq4tADw-AKjc&hl=en&sa=X&oi=book_result&resnum=6&ct=result#PPA503,M1
Thanks Anne and slogger
still trying to run out the door....


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #789 1/1/09 -
Post by: Nut44x4 on January 03, 2009, 02:21:19 PM
(http://i18.photobucket.com/albums/b104/Blondeonahd/Scard%20Monkeys%20Mod/LOCK2.gif)

 ::MonkeyCool::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #789 1/1/09 -
Post by: texasmom on January 03, 2009, 02:22:56 PM
1/2/2009 Mambo Jambo

http://www.magic965.com/index.php?option=com_wrapper&view=wrapper&Itemid=87

(http://www.magic965.com/pictures/albums/JAN2009/020109%20MAMBO/Mambo_28.JPG)

 :smt078


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #789 1/1/09 -
Post by: Ree on January 03, 2009, 02:25:02 PM
Folks, I left early last night, but catching up gives me reason to be a little suspicious this morning.  We got somewhat good news from CAPS, Kermie and Red.  Then an interesting discussion begins about Columbian connections and following the money.  In the middle of that LDStLou shows up again to defend Kyle some more the the topic of discussion is completely forgotten. ::MonkeyConfused::

Thanks to Kermit for coming back and backing up everything that was said concerning Kyle.

Ree...KeepTheFaith and I started the discussion about following the money.  I assure you it was to do nothing other than have a discussion.  The issue of Kyle seems to be the only thing allowed in here anymore.  I would like to discuss other topics as well.  No conspiracy...

I don't think Ree was meaning anything negative towards us Truthseeker2.Correct me if i'm wrong Ree!TIA.Did You read about Nilo swean getting in a car wreck Truthseeker2?

No, nothing negative towards either of you or the topic.  Just voicing my frustration that every time a good discussion gets started, somebody shows up to talk about Kyle again.  If he's not man enough to stand up here in the cage and tell us his side, then quite frankly, Scarlet, I don't give a damn (what his side is).


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #789 1/1/09 -
Post by: Anna on January 03, 2009, 02:29:47 PM
Thanks Anne and slogger
still trying to run out the door....



You are welcome billb but my name is AnnA and not Anne.  It's a palindrome.  :-)


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #789 1/1/09 -
Post by: Artcolley on January 03, 2009, 02:30:46 PM
1/2/2009 Mambo Jambo

http://www.magic965.com/index.php?option=com_wrapper&view=wrapper&Itemid=87

(http://www.magic965.com/pictures/albums/JAN2009/020109%20MAMBO/Mambo_28.JPG)

 :smt078


Wish his tongue would get tangled up in the turntable
ANd WTH happened to his head? Looks like mange to me  ::MonkeyConfused::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #789 1/1/09 -
Post by: Anna on January 03, 2009, 02:31:16 PM
To add to the maritime confusion, there is also a Dutch Marine presence in the area.  Not sure which the Panther/Panter belonged to after all this time.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #789 1/1/09 -
Post by: Keepthefaith on January 03, 2009, 02:31:55 PM
Folks, I left early last night, but catching up gives me reason to be a little suspicious this morning.  We got somewhat good news from CAPS, Kermie and Red.  Then an interesting discussion begins about Columbian connections and following the money.  In the middle of that LDStLou shows up again to defend Kyle some more the the topic of discussion is completely forgotten. ::MonkeyConfused::

Thanks to Kermit for coming back and backing up everything that was said concerning Kyle.

Ree...KeepTheFaith and I started the discussion about following the money.  I assure you it was to do nothing other than have a discussion.  The issue of Kyle seems to be the only thing allowed in here anymore.  I would like to discuss other topics as well.  No conspiracy...

I don't think Ree was meaning anything negative towards us Truthseeker2.Correct me if i'm wrong Ree!TIA.Did You read about Nilo swean getting in a car wreck Truthseeker2?

No, nothing negative towards either of you or the topic.  Just voicing my frustration that every time a good discussion gets started, somebody shows up to talk about Kyle again.  If he's not man enough to stand up here in the cage and tell us his side, then quite frankly, Scarlet, I don't give a damn (what his side is).

Thanx Ree.So the Persistence takes off and the Coast gaurd comes in on consecutive days to do what?Clean-up?Until the contents of that cage were secured and an acre or two around that cage was sifted the Persistence should not have went anywhere.. ::MonkeyNoNo::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #789 1/1/09 -
Post by: billb's daughter on January 03, 2009, 02:32:21 PM
Thanks Anne and slogger
still trying to run out the door....



You are welcome billb but my name is AnnA and not Anne.  It's a palindrome.  :-)
My apologies Anna...I just washed my hands and can't do a thing with my (typing) fingers.... ::MonkeyWink::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #789 1/1/09 -
Post by: Anna on January 03, 2009, 02:33:09 PM
Art Collie, I was thinking severe ringworm but you may be right about it being mange.

We do tend to think along canine lines, don't we, lol.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #789 1/1/09 -
Post by: Artcolley on January 03, 2009, 02:35:20 PM
Art Collie, I was thinking severe ringworm but you may be right about it being mange.

We do tend to think along canine lines, don't we, lol.

Yes, Anna, we do, lol, They need to get THAT boy to a vet, QUICK!  ::MonkeyLaugh::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #789 1/1/09 -
Post by: Anna on January 03, 2009, 02:37:50 PM
Art Collie, I was thinking severe ringworm but you may be right about it being mange.

We do tend to think along canine lines, don't we, lol.

Yes, Anna, we do, lol, They need to get THAT boy to a vet, QUICK!  ::MonkeyLaugh::


Yep, do SCRAPINGS even!    ::MonkeyHaHa:: ::MonkeyHaHa:: ::MonkeyHaHa::



Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #789 1/1/09 -
Post by: texasmom on January 03, 2009, 02:38:26 PM
1/2/2009 Mambo Jambo

http://www.magic965.com/index.php?option=com_wrapper&view=wrapper&Itemid=87

(http://www.magic965.com/pictures/albums/JAN2009/020109%20MAMBO/Mambo_28.JPG)

 :smt078


Wish his tongue would get tangled up in the turntable
ANd WTH happened to his head? Looks like mange to me  ::MonkeyConfused::

 ::MonkeyLaugh::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #789 1/1/09 -
Post by: Artcolley on January 03, 2009, 02:38:33 PM
Art Collie, I was thinking severe ringworm but you may be right about it being mange.

We do tend to think along canine lines, don't we, lol.

Yes, Anna, we do, lol, They need to get THAT boy to a vet, QUICK!  ::MonkeyLaugh::


Yep, do SCRAPINGS even!    ::MonkeyHaHa:: ::MonkeyHaHa:: ::MonkeyHaHa::



 ::cartwheel:: ::MonkeyDance:: ::MonkeyLaugh::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #789 1/1/09 -
Post by: Slogger on January 03, 2009, 02:40:43 PM
To add to the maritime confusion, there is also a Dutch Marine presence in the area.  Not sure which the Panther/Panter belonged to after all this time.

I believe we were told there were 2-3 Aruban Coast Guard vessels, one of which was the Panter.

Wasn't that the Panter in the Aru-bay videos, off the coast near California Lighthouse--where the videos were capturing the activities?


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #789 1/1/09 -
Post by: Ree on January 03, 2009, 02:46:49 PM
So, if there were no human remains in that cage and ALE knows it, because they retrieved the contents on the 7th, why waste time vacuuming the sand?  Didn't we recently here it was shells or coral?


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #789 1/1/09 -
Post by: Artcolley on January 03, 2009, 02:49:43 PM
So, if there were no human remains in that cage and ALE knows it, because they retrieved the contents on the 7th, why waste time vacuuming the sand?  Didn't we recently here it was shells or coral?

Good question since vacuuming the sand would imply searching for artifacts related to the contents of the cage.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #789 1/1/09 -
Post by: Blue Moon on January 03, 2009, 02:50:59 PM
So, if there were no human remains in that cage and ALE knows it, because they retrieved the contents on the 7th, why waste time vacuuming the sand?  Didn't we recently here it was shells or coral?

and plastic.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #789 1/1/09 -
Post by: Slogger on January 03, 2009, 02:53:27 PM
So, if there were no human remains in that cage and ALE knows it, because they retrieved the contents on the 7th, why waste time vacuuming the sand?  Didn't we recently here it was shells or coral?

Good question since vacuuming the sand would imply searching for artifacts related to the contents of the cage.

Or, removing them so they will never be found again.  We don't know, yet; but, something was going on.  We do know that much.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #789 1/1/09 -
Post by: Artcolley on January 03, 2009, 02:56:23 PM
So, if there were no human remains in that cage and ALE knows it, because they retrieved the contents on the 7th, why waste time vacuuming the sand?  Didn't we recently here it was shells or coral?

Good question since vacuuming the sand would imply searching for artifacts related to the contents of the cage.

Or, removing them so they will never be found again.  We don't know, yet; but, something was going on.  We do know that much.

Yes, something was certainly going on. I hope we will learn just what that was. Given Aruba's track record in handling evidence, I would say removing them and "disappearing" them, is the best answer. Time will tell, I suppose.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #789 1/1/09 -
Post by: Slogger on January 03, 2009, 02:56:24 PM
So, if there were no human remains in that cage and ALE knows it, because they retrieved the contents on the 7th, why waste time vacuuming the sand?  Didn't we recently here it was shells or coral?

and plastic.


Interesting that John S. would say it was only broken plastic bags that looked like a skull.  (Yep, looked like a skull, and a sneaker, plus other assorted articles.)  Ziplocks create magic!


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #789 1/1/09 -
Post by: SS on January 03, 2009, 02:56:27 PM
Does this look like Ramona Rodriguez? Only one I see in the NJ system, but it might be from a prior arrest.

(https://www6.state.nj.us/DOC_Inmate/photo?id=1176867)



BB - I could be wrong, but I don't think that's her.  There's a picture of her in the Shango thread somewhere.  It was taken at the prison in Hudson County during a video arrangement of some kind.  She's pretty heavy set.  I think her arrest information said that she was born in the DR and had a jewelry business in Aruba and Brooklyn.  He daughter, niece, sister, or relationship undefined was arrested the same morning over in the Bronx.  It was a joint task force effort.  Her name is Lucy Tejera.  Ramona's is Ramona Rodriguez Tejera.  Both had 8 kilos of heroin.  Daury was arrested a month later and he also had 8 kilos.  Ramona and Daury were initially held in the Hudson County Prison in Kearny, but Daury has since been moved to a Morris County prison.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #789 1/1/09 -
Post by: wreck on January 03, 2009, 02:59:34 PM
To add to the maritime confusion, there is also a Dutch Marine presence in the area.  Not sure which the Panther/Panter belonged to after all this time.
I was going to ask the same thing, but the forum crashed for me! Is the Panter/Panther Aruban or is it Dutch owned?


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #789 1/1/09 -
Post by: Slogger on January 03, 2009, 03:01:04 PM
So, if there were no human remains in that cage and ALE knows it, because they retrieved the contents on the 7th, why waste time vacuuming the sand?  Didn't we recently here it was shells or coral?

Good question since vacuuming the sand would imply searching for artifacts related to the contents of the cage.

Or, removing them so they will never be found again.  We don't know, yet; but, something was going on.  We do know that much.

Yes, something was certainly going on. I hope we will learn just what that was. Given Aruba's track record in handling evidence, I would say removing them and "disappearing" them, is the best answer. Time will tell, I suppose.

There is a slim possibility that something else is going on, but it's very slim.  We have watched and seen the track record.

Aruba should know by now that they must do something to produce Natalee, or this will NEVER END.  If their "Grand Finale" includes NATALEE . . . HOME, Aruba may escape worse consequences.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #789 1/1/09 -
Post by: SS on January 03, 2009, 03:01:43 PM


Yes, I do think there could be a Colombian connection.  I started that line of thinking over a year ago and located an individual there with Aruba ties.  I also thought it odd that three nights in a row you Joran and Deepak admittedly together, but none of those times did they admit being with Freddy or Jaime.  Freddy and Jaime along with the Gottenbos bros. were the closer friends.  The statement given by Jaime is curious because of the timing of the phone calls from Joran.  Also, on 5/30 Jaime ends up at the Wyndham at the same time Andre says Joran and Guido coincidently stepped out of the casino. 

I have often believed they may have been meeting Jaime in the parking lot.

Would the Columbian ties come from Jamie then?  Is Jamie from Columbia and is his family tied into a cartel of some sorts?  (guess most families in Columbia are tied into drugs in some shape or form-guess this is a stupid question on my part).

Yes, he is Colombian.  As for his family...I'm working on that.



Jamie lived with his dad and there were some money problems.  Jamie's mother died before Natalee disappeared.  Joran reported that Jamie's mom was the first dead body that he had seen.

also interesting that he didn't say it was the ONLY dead body he had seen. how many 17 year olds see multiple dead bodies?



Great catch Rob!!!  I didn't think of it that way.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #789 1/1/09 -
Post by: Artcolley on January 03, 2009, 03:05:13 PM
So, if there were no human remains in that cage and ALE knows it, because they retrieved the contents on the 7th, why waste time vacuuming the sand?  Didn't we recently here it was shells or coral?

Good question since vacuuming the sand would imply searching for artifacts related to the contents of the cage.

Or, removing them so they will never be found again.  We don't know, yet; but, something was going on.  We do know that much.

Yes, something was certainly going on. I hope we will learn just what that was. Given Aruba's track record in handling evidence, I would say removing them and "disappearing" them, is the best answer. Time will tell, I suppose.

There is a slim possibility that something else is going on, but it's very slim.  We have watched and seen the track record.

Aruba should know by now that they must do something to produce Natalee, or this will NEVER END.  If their "Grand Finale" includes NATALEE . . . HOME, Aruba may escape worse consequences.


I agree, anything less just won't "cut it" at this point in time.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #789 1/1/09 -
Post by: bleachedblack on January 03, 2009, 03:05:15 PM
Thank-you SS, I think I am wrong about the photo too.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #789 1/1/09 -
Post by: Tamikosmom on January 03, 2009, 03:12:16 PM
So, if there were no human remains in that cage and ALE knows it, because they retrieved the contents on the 7th, why waste time vacuuming the sand?  Didn't we recently here it was shells or coral?

I cannot comprehend why Kyle Kingman and John Silvetti were attempting to cut a deal with the major networks in regards to a discovery that was not related to the Natalee Holloway case.

Janet

+++++++


KYLE KINGMAN - IN HIS OWN WORDS

THE NETWORKS


Kyle: I've talked with Peter Shouten numerous times back in February. He hasn't seen anything but knows about the blue fabrics. DeVries and Endemol was interested in purchasing the ROV footage and I was working between them, ABC, and CBS to strike a deal.

Kyle: Louis is currently working with someone who I do not know to put together some documentary on the case, the way it was handled, and what happened during the search. I learned this from Tim T. yesterday. Louis was sold on the idea that it will make him a lot of money.

Kyle: She [BETH] needs to know exactly what we found in the proper timing. The way to do that would be through Tim Trahan and I. I can arrange any meeting with him. He represents the owner and the rights to the data, in this case, Louis S. I have everything but I don't want to go around him for chain of custody reasons, professional courtesy, and friendship.
 
The next step:

I will soon propose a meeting with Beth and other family members, myself, Tim Trahan, Peter DeVries, and whomever else necessary to go over the ROV video, contents, and case status. I would like a couple people very familiar with the case documents also present to help connect dots during the meeting. I would prefer meeting towards the end of April or mid-May to allow adequate time for things to shake themselves out if is going to. If necessary, I have an ABC (20/20) and CBS (early show) film crew ready and willing to take part in such a meeting should it require press coverage. I've already had a meeting with ABC about this and they are "definitely interested" at the executive level. We met in mid-Feb about this already. The question becomes timing, who needs to be there, and whether or not it's covered by the press. I prefer not, but it may be useful. DeVries doesn't need to be there in my opinion but he's good for ratings and helps ABC be cooperative if needed.  


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #789 1/1/09 -
Post by: Slogger on January 03, 2009, 03:16:21 PM
So, if there were no human remains in that cage and ALE knows it, because they retrieved the contents on the 7th, why waste time vacuuming the sand?  Didn't we recently here it was shells or coral?

Good question since vacuuming the sand would imply searching for artifacts related to the contents of the cage.

Or, removing them so they will never be found again.  We don't know, yet; but, something was going on.  We do know that much.

Yes, something was certainly going on. I hope we will learn just what that was. Given Aruba's track record in handling evidence, I would say removing them and "disappearing" them, is the best answer. Time will tell, I suppose.

There is a slim possibility that something else is going on, but it's very slim.  We have watched and seen the track record.

Aruba should know by now that they must do something to produce Natalee, or this will NEVER END.  If their "Grand Finale" includes NATALEE . . . HOME, Aruba may escape worse consequences.


I agree, anything less just won't "cut it" at this point in time.

It's all Natalee's family wanted from the beginning.  It's the PRIME FACTOR in the efforts, and the main reason this has continued.  I hope Aruba has realized it . . . finally.

One good thing is that the activities surrounding the cage/trap indicate Natalee was not completely destroyed.  Even if they are trying to snooker us (once again) it won't work without the actual remains verified by the FBI.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #789 1/1/09 -
Post by: Tamikosmom on January 03, 2009, 03:16:57 PM
So, if there were no human remains in that cage and ALE knows it, because they retrieved the contents on the 7th, why waste time vacuuming the sand?  Didn't we recently here it was shells or coral?

and plastic.


Interesting that John S. would say it was only broken plastic bags that looked like a skull.  (Yep, looked like a skull, and a sneaker, plus other assorted articles.)  Ziplocks create magic!

KYLE KINGMAN - IN HIS OWN WORDS

Kyle:
John is not a believer in the trap. He took ALE's word as gospel that it wasn't case related, yet never studied the videos or bothered to inquire further. He had plans on doing business with Aruba and in S. America and he didn't want to hurt any feelings by talks hinting at lack of complete trust and friendship.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #789 1/1/09 -
Post by: SS on January 03, 2009, 03:17:16 PM
To add to the maritime confusion, there is also a Dutch Marine presence in the area.  Not sure which the Panther/Panter belonged to after all this time.
I was going to ask the same thing, but the forum crashed for me! Is the Panter/Panther Aruban or is it Dutch owned?



Wreck - I think it's Dutch.  Somewhere there are photo comparisons of the Panter and other Dutch Coast Guard ships, the Aruba-Bay videos, and some pictures of the Panter in a Dutch harbor.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #789 1/1/09 -
Post by: wreck on January 03, 2009, 03:17:25 PM
ree:
Quote
So, if there were no human remains in that cage and ALE knows it, because they retrieved the contents on the 7th, why waste time vacuuming the sand?  Didn't we recently here it was shells or coral
?

janet:
Quote
I cannot comprehend why Kyle Kingman and John Silvetti were attempting to cut a deal with the major networks in regards to a discovery that was not related to the Natalee Holloway case.

Janet
And that my friends is it in a nutshell.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #789 1/1/09 -
Post by: billb's daughter on January 03, 2009, 03:18:20 PM
To add to the maritime confusion, there is also a Dutch Marine presence in the area.  Not sure which the Panther/Panter belonged to after all this time.
I was going to ask the same thing, but the forum crashed for me! Is the Panter/Panther Aruban or is it Dutch owned?
The link I posted on page 46 of this thread describes the three coast guard ships:
http://books.google.com/books?id=5iDJCTRvNjEC&pg=PA503&lpg=PA503&dq=aruban+coast+guard&source=web&ots=8jQZk7mKKa&sig=MU5LhehZUFa-Mg0zq4tADw-AKjc&hl=en&sa=X&oi=book_result&resnum=6&ct=result#PPA503,M1
The Panter, Jaguar, and Poema...
The Panter was the one I believe Rob pointed out in the aru-bay videos...I think Auruba makes payments to the Royal Netherlands Navy for the ships/and-or Dutch crewmembers that work on the ships along with Aruban sailors..there was a front page post on SM this past June about the payments:
http://scaredmonkeys.com/2008/06/24/will-the-coast-guard-send-aruba-to-collections-aruba-behind-in-payments/
The part about dutch sailors augmenting the aruban sailors is on the first link above....


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #789 1/1/09 -
Post by: Keepthefaith on January 03, 2009, 03:18:55 PM
So, if there were no human remains in that cage and ALE knows it, because they retrieved the contents on the 7th, why waste time vacuuming the sand?  Didn't we recently here it was shells or coral?

I cannot comprehend why Kyle Kingman and John Silvetti were attempting to cut a deal with the major networks in regards to a discovery that was not related to the Natalee Holloway case.

Janet

+++++++


KYLE KINGMAN - IN HIS OWN WORDS

THE NETWORKS


Kyle: I've talked with Peter Shouten numerous times back in February. He hasn't seen anything but knows about the blue fabrics. DeVries and Endemol was interested in purchasing the ROV footage and I was working between them, ABC, and CBS to strike a deal.

Kyle: Louis is currently working with someone who I do not know to put together some documentary on the case, the way it was handled, and what happened during the search. I learned this from Tim T. yesterday. Louis was sold on the idea that it will make him a lot of money.

Kyle: She [BETH] needs to know exactly what we found in the proper timing. The way to do that would be through Tim Trahan and I. I can arrange any meeting with him. He represents the owner and the rights to the data, in this case, Louis S. I have everything but I don't want to go around him for chain of custody reasons, professional courtesy, and friendship.
 
The next step:

I will soon propose a meeting with Beth and other family members, myself, Tim Trahan, Peter DeVries, and whomever else necessary to go over the ROV video, contents, and case status. I would like a couple people very familiar with the case documents also present to help connect dots during the meeting. I would prefer meeting towards the end of April or mid-May to allow adequate time for things to shake themselves out if is going to. If necessary, I have an ABC (20/20) and CBS (early show) film crew ready and willing to take part in such a meeting should it require press coverage. I've already had a meeting with ABC about this and they are "definitely interested" at the executive level. We met in mid-Feb about this already. The question becomes timing, who needs to be there, and whether or not it's covered by the press. I prefer not, but it may be useful. DeVries doesn't need to be there in my opinion but he's good for ratings and helps ABC be cooperative if needed.  


And it wasn't Kyle's job to turn over anything to the FBI,he wasn't the one in charge of turning things over,yadda,yadda,yadda...Seems to me he was in knee deep with everything... ::MonkeyCool::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #789 1/1/09 -
Post by: Artcolley on January 03, 2009, 03:24:25 PM

It's all Natalee's family wanted from the beginning.  It's the PRIME FACTOR in the efforts, and the main reason this has continued.  I hope Aruba has realized it . . . finally.

One good thing is that the activities surrounding the cage/trap indicate Natalee was not completely destroyed.  Even if they are trying to snooker us (once again) it won't work without the actual remains verified by the FBI.

This is a very hopeful sign, imo.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #789 1/1/09 -
Post by: Nut44x4 on January 03, 2009, 03:38:24 PM
Correct. The Panter is a Dutch Coast Guard patrol cutter
NAACGC Panter P811


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #789 1/1/09 -
Post by: Slogger on January 03, 2009, 03:40:33 PM

It's all Natalee's family wanted from the beginning.  It's the PRIME FACTOR in the efforts, and the main reason this has continued.  I hope Aruba has realized it . . . finally.

One good thing is that the activities surrounding the cage/trap indicate Natalee was not completely destroyed.  Even if they are trying to snooker us (once again) it won't work without the actual remains verified by the FBI.

This is a very hopeful sign, imo.

Yes, it is.  We've seen hopeful signs before that haven't materialized; but, Aruba has had plenty of time to assess their miscalculations.  Maybe this time they will choose more wisely.



Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #789 1/1/09 -
Post by: Buckeye on January 03, 2009, 03:41:10 PM
O/T

Just found the link to the article about Schaefer.  Just posting so I don't lose it again:


January 4, 2008

Until Underwater Expeditions can get a hold of their own boat, Schaefer is financing expeditions on other boats. One such expedition is currently out in Caribbean waters off Aruba looking for the remains of Natalee Holloway, an Alabama high school senior whose 2005 disappearance became a media sensation.

We are also going to explore some sunken shipwrecks — for treasure,” Stovall said.

These expeditions are an interesting part of this investment, but not very profitable, Stovall said. The charter tour operations should make Underwater Expeditions break even, at least, he said.

“Louis believes that having fun in work is bigger and better than money,” Stovall said. “This isn’t a have-to business.”


http://www.fishcoastaltexas.com/forums/archive/index.php/t-8368.html


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #789 1/1/09 -
Post by: wreck on January 03, 2009, 03:45:07 PM

It's all Natalee's family wanted from the beginning.  It's the PRIME FACTOR in the efforts, and the main reason this has continued.  I hope Aruba has realized it . . . finally.

One good thing is that the activities surrounding the cage/trap indicate Natalee was not completely destroyed.  Even if they are trying to snooker us (once again) it won't work without the actual remains verified by the FBI.

This is a very hopeful sign, imo.

Yes, it is.  We've seen hopeful signs before that haven't materialized; but, Aruba has had plenty of time to assess their miscalculations.  Maybe this time they will choose more wisely.


I wished I shared your optimism, but just who is going to make Aruba turn over what they have? Those who are guilty of the cover-up won't ever reveal what they have. I cannot expect to ever see "justice" for Natalee, but I do expect the truth to be exposed to the world. Aruba will have to live with their shame.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #789 1/1/09 -
Post by: KYcat on January 03, 2009, 03:45:15 PM
The problem for some here is that they take ONE sentence and analyze it to death. In order to comprehend what Kermit, Jen etc. are telling us, you need to step back and look at the whole picture. Each statement by Kyle alone is "defensible" -- NOT, however when you look at the whole picture and in the proper time table.

Excuse me, wreck, but the whole picture has not been presented.  With all due respect, I am just as capable of comprehending as any other monkey.  Re: Natalee Case Discussion #789 1/1/09 -
« Reply #713 on: Today at 02:55:36 AM »and I hope you do not mind of I ask for it.  If it cannot be provided, then I will still question the conclusions.  Not agree or disagee, just question. 

Stepping back is good advice, maybe, for all of us.

Truth, with all due respect, this information has been posted repeatedly.  You have been here, you know this.  It is great to question, but why question something that has been stated so many times over.  You are capable of going back and reading these posts like all the rest of us.  They are there.  Do you want us to drag them back out to prove that single post of Kermits? 

KY, actually the complete context of that particular statement has not been posted here.  I have been quietly watching for it.

But, I'm stepping back.  One line of discussion here and this is not the only thing I am interested in. 

Truth Actually, the complete context of that particular statement HAS been posted here.

Please go back to this link ...........Re: Natalee Case Discussion #789 1/1/09 -
« Reply #713 on: Today at 02:55:36 AM »


Read the above reply #713 and  #714, #715, #716 and #717.  You must have missed this, as I believe this answers your question.



Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #789 1/1/09 -
Post by: KYcat on January 03, 2009, 03:50:38 PM
O/T

Just found the link to the article about Schaefer.  Just posting so I don't lose it again:


January 4, 2008

Until Underwater Expeditions can get a hold of their own boat, Schaefer is financing expeditions on other boats. One such expedition is currently out in Caribbean waters off Aruba looking for the remains of Natalee Holloway, an Alabama high school senior whose 2005 disappearance became a media sensation.

We are also going to explore some sunken shipwrecks — for treasure,” Stovall said.

These expeditions are an interesting part of this investment, but not very profitable, Stovall said. The charter tour operations should make Underwater Expeditions break even, at least, he said.

“Louis believes that having fun in work is bigger and better than money,” Stovall said. “This isn’t a have-to business.”


http://www.fishcoastaltexas.com/forums/archive/index.php/t-8368.html

Thanks for that Buckeye.  I remember the sunken treasures being an interest.  But, I don't believe for a minute that Schaeffer believes that having fun in work is bigger and better than MONEY!!!   

 ::MonkeyHaHa::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #789 1/1/09 -
Post by: Keepthefaith on January 03, 2009, 03:51:14 PM
Out for a bit.BBL.. ::MonkeyDance::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #789 1/1/09 -
Post by: wreck on January 03, 2009, 03:54:16 PM
O/T

Just found the link to the article about Schaefer.  Just posting so I don't lose it again:


January 4, 2008

Until Underwater Expeditions can get a hold of their own boat, Schaefer is financing expeditions on other boats. One such expedition is currently out in Caribbean waters off Aruba looking for the remains of Natalee Holloway, an Alabama high school senior whose 2005 disappearance became a media sensation.

We are also going to explore some sunken shipwrecks — for treasure,” Stovall said.

These expeditions are an interesting part of this investment, but not very profitable, Stovall said. The charter tour operations should make Underwater Expeditions break even, at least, he said.

“Louis believes that having fun in work is bigger and better than money,” Stovall said. “This isn’t a have-to business.”


http://www.fishcoastaltexas.com/forums/archive/index.php/t-8368.html

Thanks for that Buckeye.  I remember the sunken treasures being an interest.  But, I don't believe for a minute that Schaeffer believes that having fun in work is bigger and better than MONEY!!!   

 ::MonkeyHaHa::
Fun puts bread on the table!!!  ::MonkeyRoll::  ::MonkeyShocked::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #789 1/1/09 -
Post by: KYcat on January 03, 2009, 03:58:15 PM
Wreck

 ::MonkeyLaugh::

Fun has never put food on my table................usually just takes away from table!

But I'm up for it, anywho!


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #789 1/1/09 -
Post by: Anna on January 03, 2009, 03:58:41 PM
I wished I shared your optimism, but just who is going to make Aruba turn over what they have? Those who are guilty of the cover-up won't ever reveal what they have. I cannot expect to ever see "justice" for Natalee, but I do expect the truth to be exposed to the world. Aruba will have to live with their shame.


I don't have much optimism either, wreck.  Maybe those tapes of Colombians will implicate Paulus in hiring pros for disposal of remains or even tell where?  We don't even know for sure if Natalee was in that fish trap or not and appears now we will just have to take the word of ALE that they did in fact turn over all they had which is very hard to believe.

I think the reason it took so long for Richardson to send to the FBI was he was waiting for results locally himself before sending to be sure nothing of Natalee was being sent.  Wanted the answers before posing the question.  So they knew they were safe to send to FBI.



Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #789 1/1/09 -
Post by: bastibro on January 03, 2009, 04:03:17 PM
To add to the maritime confusion, there is also a Dutch Marine presence in the area.  Not sure which the Panther/Panter belonged to after all this time.
I was going to ask the same thing, but the forum crashed for me! Is the Panter/Panther Aruban or is it Dutch owned?
The link I posted on page 46 of this thread describes the three coast guard ships:
http://books.google.com/books?id=5iDJCTRvNjEC&pg=PA503&lpg=PA503&dq=aruban+coast+guard&source=web&ots=8jQZk7mKKa&sig=MU5LhehZUFa-Mg0zq4tADw-AKjc&hl=en&sa=X&oi=book_result&resnum=6&ct=result#PPA503,M1
The Panter, Jaguar, and Poema...
The Panter was the one I believe Rob pointed out in the aru-bay videos...I think Auruba makes payments to the Royal Netherlands Navy for the ships/and-or Dutch crewmembers that work on the ships along with Aruban sailors..there was a front page post on SM this past June about the payments:
http://scaredmonkeys.com/2008/06/24/will-the-coast-guard-send-aruba-to-collections-aruba-behind-in-payments/
The part about dutch sailors augmenting the aruban sailors is on the first link above....

P811 Panter (1999) , Patrol Vessels for the Caribbean. Officially, not from the navy, but the Coast Guard Netherlands Antilles and Aruba.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #789 1/1/09 -
Post by: KYcat on January 03, 2009, 04:04:43 PM
Janet, I too, need an EDIT button.  For goodness sakes, I have messed up my earlier post.  2NJ  :smt039  Would you please fix my post, the one addressed to Truth.  I accidently messed up his quote within the quote stack and I'm sure he doesn't want me putting words in his mouth ... ::MonkeyHaHa::

Bad enough words come out of mine!! 

I think I messed up because my head hurts.  It spun around so much last night, I felt like Linda Blair.... just needed some green pea soup to complete my act.

 ::MonkeyTongue::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #789 1/1/09 -
Post by: truthseeker2 on January 03, 2009, 04:05:53 PM
The problem for some here is that they take ONE sentence and analyze it to death. In order to comprehend what Kermit, Jen etc. are telling us, you need to step back and look at the whole picture. Each statement by Kyle alone is "defensible" -- NOT, however when you look at the whole picture and in the proper time table.

Excuse me, wreck, but the whole picture has not been presented.  With all due respect, I am just as capable of comprehending as any other monkey.  Re: Natalee Case Discussion #789 1/1/09 -
« Reply #713 on: Today at 02:55:36 AM »and I hope you do not mind of I ask for it.  If it cannot be provided, then I will still question the conclusions.  Not agree or disagee, just question. 

Stepping back is good advice, maybe, for all of us.

Truth, with all due respect, this information has been posted repeatedly.  You have been here, you know this.  It is great to question, but why question something that has been stated so many times over.  You are capable of going back and reading these posts like all the rest of us.  They are there.  Do you want us to drag them back out to prove that single post of Kermits? 

KY, actually the complete context of that particular statement has not been posted here.  I have been quietly watching for it.

But, I'm stepping back.  One line of discussion here and this is not the only thing I am interested in. 

Truth Actually, the complete context of that particular statement HAS been posted here.

Please go back to this link ...........Re: Natalee Case Discussion #789 1/1/09 -
« Reply #713 on: Today at 02:55:36 AM »


Read the above reply #713 and  #714, #715, #716 and #717.  You must have missed this, as I believe this answers your question.



713 - This is the only post that statement appeared in the list of posts you have there.  I still do not see the actual question that prompted that response.  Which question was it?  (His name is misspelled on one?)  And one instance doesn't have a date.  Was that included on the 11 Feb 2008 date and again on March 18th?  Either way, I don't think this is the topic I need to be involved with anymore.  I'll just stay out of it.  But thanks for pointing this out.  I had already seen it though.

FEB:
Kyle: "I've talked with Peter Shouten numerous times back in February. He hasn't seen anything but knows about the blue fabrics. DeVries and Endemol was interested in purchasing the ROV footage and I was working between them, ABC, and CBS to strike a deal.

Kyle: "I should clarify that the footage proceeds (if sold) wouldn't even have covered the cost of the project, but it would have helped.


11 Feb 2008 - Kyle asks for donations for the Persistence to continue the search. They are out of funds.


Kyle: "Klye:  I did not give the information to the FBI and I'm unaware of anyone relaying the possibility to them.

February 27 there is a side sonar search of the pond. Kyle said it was to rule out one of the ponds that had never been searched
February 27 Caps uses a shango post to give the directions to the pond
FEBRUARY 29 LAWSUIT ANNOUNCED ON SCHAEFFER'S COMPANY BY A LAW FIRM IN LOUISIANA
http://au.us.biz.yahoo.com/iw/080229/0368776.html



MAR 1. The RV Persistence announced it was returning and needed funds
MARCH 1, 2008 - KYLE POSTS AT SM THEY FLY OUT OF ARUBA TOMORROW

Kyle: "Kyle: I couldn't get the logs from the Persistence. All things "Holloway" were stripped from the boat once it got back to Louisiana"

March 18th Kyle stated: "I did not give the information to the FBI and I'm unaware of anyone relaying the possibility to them. I"

March 20th Kyle stated: "I prefer moving forward with the evidence I have access and knowledge about and using that as a can opener. Once the can is open, the worms are revealed."



Kyle: The next step:
I will soon propose a meeting with Beth and other family members, myself, Tim Trahan, Peter DeVries, and whomever else necessary to go over the ROV video, contents, and case status. I would like a couple people very familiar with the case documents also present to help connect dots during the meeting. I would prefer meeting towards the end of April or mid-May to allow adequate time for things to shake themselves out if is going to. If necessary, I have an ABC (20/20) and CBS (early show) film crew ready and willing to take part in such a meeting should it require press coverage. I've already had a meeting with ABC about this and they are "definitely interested" at the executive level. We met in mid-Feb about this already. The question becomes timing, who needs to be there, and whether or not it's covered by the press. I prefer not, but it may be useful. DeVries doesn't need to be there in my opinion but he's good for ratings and helps ABC be cooperative if needed.

May 19, 2008: "KYLE: "I couldn't get the logs from the Persistence. All things "Holloway" were stripped from the boat once it got back to Louisiana. I had some stuff on my hard drive, but not those logs with the names. The logs and other information are in an unknown secure location. Only two people know that location and I am not one of them. I know better not even to ask about it, especially now."


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #789 1/1/09 -
Post by: Tamikosmom on January 03, 2009, 04:06:28 PM
So, if there were no human remains in that cage and ALE knows it, because they retrieved the contents on the 7th, why waste time vacuuming the sand?  Didn't we recently here it was shells or coral?

I cannot comprehend why Kyle Kingman and John Silvetti were attempting to cut a deal with the major networks in regards to a discovery that was not related to the Natalee Holloway case.

Janet

+++++++


KYLE KINGMAN - IN HIS OWN WORDS

THE NETWORKS


Kyle: I've talked with Peter Shouten numerous times back in February. He hasn't seen anything but knows about the blue fabrics. DeVries and Endemol was interested in purchasing the ROV footage and I was working between them, ABC, and CBS to strike a deal.

Kyle: Louis is currently working with someone who I do not know to put together some documentary on the case, the way it was handled, and what happened during the search. I learned this from Tim T. yesterday. Louis was sold on the idea that it will make him a lot of money.

Kyle: She [BETH] needs to know exactly what we found in the proper timing. The way to do that would be through Tim Trahan and I. I can arrange any meeting with him. He represents the owner and the rights to the data, in this case, Louis S. I have everything but I don't want to go around him for chain of custody reasons, professional courtesy, and friendship.
 
The next step:

I will soon propose a meeting with Beth and other family members, myself, Tim Trahan, Peter DeVries, and whomever else necessary to go over the ROV video, contents, and case status. I would like a couple people very familiar with the case documents also present to help connect dots during the meeting. I would prefer meeting towards the end of April or mid-May to allow adequate time for things to shake themselves out if is going to. If necessary, I have an ABC (20/20) and CBS (early show) film crew ready and willing to take part in such a meeting should it require press coverage. I've already had a meeting with ABC about this and they are "definitely interested" at the executive level. We met in mid-Feb about this already. The question becomes timing, who needs to be there, and whether or not it's covered by the press. I prefer not, but it may be useful. DeVries doesn't need to be there in my opinion but he's good for ratings and helps ABC be cooperative if needed.  


And it wasn't Kyle's job to turn over anything to the FBI,he wasn't the one in charge of turning things over,yadda,yadda,yadda...Seems to me he was in knee deep with everything... ::MonkeyCool::

KYLE KINGMAN - IN HIS OWN WORDS

Kyle stated: "No one else has access or copies of the photos or footage. All fingers point back to me when this leaks."

 ::MonkeyShocked::



Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #789 1/1/09 -
Post by: KYcat on January 03, 2009, 04:08:36 PM
DOES ANYONE HAVE ANY ADVIL?  WHISKEY?  TEQUILLA?  MORPHINE?  ANYTHING?


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #789 1/1/09 -
Post by: wreck on January 03, 2009, 04:11:08 PM
The TV networks were aware of the blue fabric in the trap in mid-February, but the family did not know until March!  ::MonkeyNoNo::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #789 1/1/09 -
Post by: wreck on January 03, 2009, 04:16:10 PM
The FBI shared pics of trap from Dec. 29th (the ones Kyle says HE sent them) with Dave and Robin. The FBI didn't share the pics from Jan.7th because THEY NEVER HAD THEM!. If Kyle was the one to send the De. 29th pics to the FBI -- why didn't he also send the Jan. 7th pics? He certainly had them (to SELL) in February.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #789 1/1/09 -
Post by: bleachedblack on January 03, 2009, 04:17:17 PM
Needle in a haystack

January 08, 2008 12:10 am
 Trying to find the truth about the disappearance of his daughter, Dave Holloway and his attorney must first wade through a sea of misinformation.

Monday was a prime example of what Holloway must put up with.

A man, who said he was calling from Nicaragua, contacted Holloway telling him he knew the whereabouts of his daughter, 18-year old Natalee Holloway, who has been missing since March 25, 2005 during a senior trip to Aruba. After talking with the man who would not give his name or phone number, Dave Holloway has all but written off the "source" as bogus.

"I've gotten a lot of strange stories since Natalee's disappearance," said Holloway. "Although the number of calls aren't as bad as they used to be, we still get them."

 After listening to the man's claims, Holloway referred him to the attorney handling the case on this end.

"I'm about at the point where I'm running out of options," said Holloway. "The case has been closed by Aruban authorities and there just isn't any good information coming in anymore. But I still have to listen to every story I can. Maybe one day something will come from one of them."

A boat is still searching off the island of Aruba for Natalee's body. Working alongside Texas Equa-Search, a non-profit organization that specializes in searching for missing persons, Holloway said the owner of a survey boat equipped with some of the most up to date undersea technology has generously volunteered his time and crew to search for the missing teen.

"They've been down there for about three weeks," Holloway said. "You never know, maybe they'll find something."

Natalee Holloway was last seen the night before she and her classmates from Mountain Brook High School, located just outside Birmingham, Ala., were due to return from Aruba on a senior trip. Witnesses said they saw her get into a car occupied by three Aruban natives, Joran van der Sloot, Deepak Kalpoe and his younger brother, Satish Kalpoe.

During a television interview for the news program 48 Hours on March 25, 2006, Aruben Lead Investigator Gerold Dompig said theories surrounding the investigation, prior to it being closed, included Natalee's body being moved two or more times. The "source" Monday said the body was buried in Nicaragua instead of being dumped in the ocean as first suspected. Holloway has his doubts.

 "He claims to have physical evidence but then balked at sending me samples so I could have DNA checked," Dave Holloway said. "There's another sign that this may be just another dead end."

Holloway has now been around the block several times since his daughter became missing. He knows there are a large number of people who would like to gain some sort of financial windfall by providing false information. As tiresome as it gets to field these kinds of calls, Holloway knows he has to listen, if for just a minute.

"Some people mean well and are genuinely trying to help but others are out there to rip you off," he said. "It's just something we have to put up with right now."

It will all stop when Natalee is found, he said.

http://www.meridianstar.com/local/local_story_008001043.html


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #789 1/1/09 -
Post by: KYcat on January 03, 2009, 04:17:29 PM
The FBI shared pics of trap from Dec. 29th (the ones Kyle says HE sent them) with Dave and Robin. The FBI didn't share the pics from Jan.7th because THEY NEVER HAD THEM!. If Kyle was the one to send the De. 29th pics to the FBI -- why didn't he also send the Jan. 7th pics? He certainly had them (to SELL) in February.

I'm sorry, what was the question?  j/k 

trying to lighten things up!

 ::MonkeyTongue::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #789 1/1/09 -
Post by: Blue Moon on January 03, 2009, 04:20:53 PM
O/T

Just found the link to the article about Schaefer.  Just posting so I don't lose it again:


January 4, 2008

Until Underwater Expeditions can get a hold of their own boat, Schaefer is financing expeditions on other boats. One such expedition is currently out in Caribbean waters off Aruba looking for the remains of Natalee Holloway, an Alabama high school senior whose 2005 disappearance became a media sensation.

We are also going to explore some sunken shipwrecks — for treasure,” Stovall said.

These expeditions are an interesting part of this investment, but not very profitable, Stovall said. The charter tour operations should make Underwater Expeditions break even, at least, he said.

“Louis believes that having fun in work is bigger and better than money,” Stovall said. “This isn’t a have-to business.”


http://www.fishcoastaltexas.com/forums/archive/index.php/t-8368.html

In order to have conducted a treasure hunt they had to have given anything found over to Aruba since they were in Aruba's waters.  Guess that meant Natalee also.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #789 1/1/09 -
Post by: wreck on January 03, 2009, 04:21:21 PM
The FBI shared pics of trap from Dec. 29th (the ones Kyle says HE sent them) with Dave and Robin. The FBI didn't share the pics from Jan.7th because THEY NEVER HAD THEM!. If Kyle was the one to send the De. 29th pics to the FBI -- why didn't he also send the Jan. 7th pics? He certainly had them (to SELL) in February.

I'm sorry, what was the question?  j/k 

trying to lighten things up!

 ::MonkeyTongue::
Don't mind me --I'm a pot stirrer.  ::MonkeyCool::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #789 1/1/09 -
Post by: KYcat on January 03, 2009, 04:22:26 PM
The FBI shared pics of trap from Dec. 29th (the ones Kyle says HE sent them) with Dave and Robin. The FBI didn't share the pics from Jan.7th because THEY NEVER HAD THEM!. If Kyle was the one to send the De. 29th pics to the FBI -- why didn't he also send the Jan. 7th pics? He certainly had them (to SELL) in February.

I'm sorry, what was the question?  j/k 

trying to lighten things up!

 ::MonkeyTongue::
Don't mind me --I'm a pot stirrer.  ::MonkeyCool::

Me thinks I am too

 ::MonkeyCool::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #789 1/1/09 -
Post by: KYcat on January 03, 2009, 04:25:09 PM
BTW... to all Mods and Klaas, my post regarding the mind altering substances, I was just kidding!  Sort of.  At least about the morphine.  I could use some Advil though, has anyone found any?


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #789 1/1/09 -
Post by: bleachedblack on January 03, 2009, 04:26:16 PM
video showing route to california lighthouse.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IAWJhtyNufk


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #789 1/1/09 -
Post by: San on January 03, 2009, 04:27:45 PM
BTW... to all Mods and Klaas, my post regarding the mind altering substances, I was just kidding!  Sort of.  At least about the morphine.  I could use some Advil though, has anyone found any?


(http://www.advil.com/products/advil/images/liquigels_left.gif)


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #789 1/1/09 -
Post by: 2NJSons_Mom on January 03, 2009, 04:28:49 PM
Janet, I too, need an EDIT button.  For goodness sakes, I have messed up my earlier post.  2NJ  :smt039  Would you please fix my post, the one addressed to Truth.  I accidently messed up his quote within the quote stack and I'm sure he doesn't want me putting words in his mouth ... ::MonkeyHaHa::

Bad enough words come out of mine!! 

I think I messed up because my head hurts.  It spun around so much last night, I felt like Linda Blair.... just needed some green pea soup to complete my act.

 ::MonkeyTongue::

I'm trying to catch up and didn't notice...which one?  The one telling him there's a link to complete quotes?    ::MonkeyConfused:: 


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #789 1/1/09 -
Post by: KYcat on January 03, 2009, 04:32:05 PM
Hey San!  Thanks for the Advil!

2NJ, don't worry about it, I messed it up, but my post was answered anyway.


 :thumleft:


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #789 1/1/09 -
Post by: Slogger on January 03, 2009, 04:34:02 PM

It's all Natalee's family wanted from the beginning.  It's the PRIME FACTOR in the efforts, and the main reason this has continued.  I hope Aruba has realized it . . . finally.

One good thing is that the activities surrounding the cage/trap indicate Natalee was not completely destroyed.  Even if they are trying to snooker us (once again) it won't work without the actual remains verified by the FBI.

This is a very hopeful sign, imo.

Yes, it is.  We've seen hopeful signs before that haven't materialized; but, Aruba has had plenty of time to assess their miscalculations.  Maybe this time they will choose more wisely.


I wished I shared your optimism, but just who is going to make Aruba turn over what they have? Those who are guilty of the cover-up won't ever reveal what they have. I cannot expect to ever see "justice" for Natalee, but I do expect the truth to be exposed to the world. Aruba will have to live with their shame.

Possibly Arubans will turn over some truth--even if accidentally.  Pressure can be an awesome thing to behold, plus the "spotlight" shining into every crack.

It is still possible that someone has evidence held for "insurance" purposes.

If we can shine the spotlight on what they fear to be exposed, there is less benefit to concealing Natalee.  The sooner they return Natalee to her home . . . the less chance of exposure.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #789 1/1/09 -
Post by: Tamikosmom on January 03, 2009, 04:34:29 PM

713 - This is the only post that statement appeared in the list of posts you have there.  I still do not see the actual question that prompted that response.  Which question was it?  (His name is misspelled on one?)  And one instance doesn't have a date.  Was that included on the 11 Feb 2008 date and again on March 18th?  Either way, I don't think this is the topic I need to be involved with anymore.  I'll just stay out of it.  But thanks for pointing this out.  I had already seen it though.

FEB:
Kyle: "I've talked with Peter Shouten numerous times back in February. He hasn't seen anything but knows about the blue fabrics. DeVries and Endemol was interested in purchasing the ROV footage and I was working between them, ABC, and CBS to strike a deal.

Kyle: "I should clarify that the footage proceeds (if sold) wouldn't even have covered the cost of the project, but it would have helped.


11 Feb 2008 - Kyle asks for donations for the Persistence to continue the search. They are out of funds.


Kyle: "Klye:  I did not give the information to the FBI and I'm unaware of anyone relaying the possibility to them.

February 27 there is a side sonar search of the pond. Kyle said it was to rule out one of the ponds that had never been searched
February 27 Caps uses a shango post to give the directions to the pond
FEBRUARY 29 LAWSUIT ANNOUNCED ON SCHAEFFER'S COMPANY BY A LAW FIRM IN LOUISIANA
http://au.us.biz.yahoo.com/iw/080229/0368776.html



MAR 1. The RV Persistence announced it was returning and needed funds
MARCH 1, 2008 - KYLE POSTS AT SM THEY FLY OUT OF ARUBA TOMORROW

Kyle: "Kyle: I couldn't get the logs from the Persistence. All things "Holloway" were stripped from the boat once it got back to Louisiana"

March 18th Kyle stated: "I did not give the information to the FBI and I'm unaware of anyone relaying the possibility to them. I"

March 20th Kyle stated: "I prefer moving forward with the evidence I have access and knowledge about and using that as a can opener. Once the can is open, the worms are revealed."



Kyle: The next step:
I will soon propose a meeting with Beth and other family members, myself, Tim Trahan, Peter DeVries, and whomever else necessary to go over the ROV video, contents, and case status. I would like a couple people very familiar with the case documents also present to help connect dots during the meeting. I would prefer meeting towards the end of April or mid-May to allow adequate time for things to shake themselves out if is going to. If necessary, I have an ABC (20/20) and CBS (early show) film crew ready and willing to take part in such a meeting should it require press coverage. I've already had a meeting with ABC about this and they are "definitely interested" at the executive level. We met in mid-Feb about this already. The question becomes timing, who needs to be there, and whether or not it's covered by the press. I prefer not, but it may be useful. DeVries doesn't need to be there in my opinion but he's good for ratings and helps ABC be cooperative if needed.

May 19, 2008: "KYLE: "I couldn't get the logs from the Persistence. All things "Holloway" were stripped from the boat once it got back to Louisiana. I had some stuff on my hard drive, but not those logs with the names. The logs and other information are in an unknown secure location. Only two people know that location and I am not one of them. I know better not even to ask about it, especially now."



jen3560
Re: Natalee Case Discussion #788 12/31/08 -
« Reply #54 on: December 31, 2008, 04:36:13 PM »


KeeptheFaith and Janet,

After we discovered this information had been withheld from US authorities, we contacted legal counsel, and were advised to keep our distance from Persistence crew members and benefactors - that is when and why Kyle was banned.

That occurred the end of September.

http://scaredmonkeys.net/index.php?topic=4328.msg605250#msg605250


Kermit
Re: Natalee Case Discussion #789 1/1/09 -
« Reply #430 on: January 02, 2009, 09:58:24 PM »


Kyle was contacted by the FBI AFTER Freebirds sent the evidence/information to them.

http://scaredmonkeys.net/index.php?topic=4340.msg609397#msg609397


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #789 1/1/09 -
Post by: San on January 03, 2009, 04:34:38 PM
Could use a little help in getting to page 50  ::MonkeyWink::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #789 1/1/09 -
Post by: wreck on January 03, 2009, 04:35:20 PM

It's all Natalee's family wanted from the beginning.  It's the PRIME FACTOR in the efforts, and the main reason this has continued.  I hope Aruba has realized it . . . finally.

One good thing is that the activities surrounding the cage/trap indicate Natalee was not completely destroyed.  Even if they are trying to snooker us (once again) it won't work without the actual remains verified by the FBI.

This is a very hopeful sign, imo.

Yes, it is.  We've seen hopeful signs before that haven't materialized; but, Aruba has had plenty of time to assess their miscalculations.  Maybe this time they will choose more wisely.


I wished I shared your optimism, but just who is going to make Aruba turn over what they have? Those who are guilty of the cover-up won't ever reveal what they have. I cannot expect to ever see "justice" for Natalee, but I do expect the truth to be exposed to the world. Aruba will have to live with their shame.

Possibly Arubans will turn over some truth--even if accidentally.  Pressure can be an awesome thing to behold, plus the "spotlight" shining into every crack.

It is still possible that someone has evidence held for "insurance" purposes.

If we can shine the spotlight on what they fear to be exposed, there is less benefit to concealing Natalee.  The sooner they return Natalee to her home . . . the less chance of exposure.

I pray you're right!!


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #789 1/1/09 -
Post by: Tamikosmom on January 03, 2009, 04:36:16 PM
2NJSons_Mom

Please delete post #965.  I apologize.  I messed up.

Thanks

Janet


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #789 1/1/09 -
Post by: 2NJSons_Mom on January 03, 2009, 04:36:40 PM
Could use a little help in getting to page 50  ::MonkeyWink::

OK, so pass the Advil.   ::MonkeyHaHa::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #789 1/1/09 -
Post by: wreck on January 03, 2009, 04:37:06 PM
Could use a little help in getting to page 50  ::MonkeyWink::
I could stir some more, if needed!


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #789 1/1/09 -
Post by: bleachedblack on January 03, 2009, 04:37:28 PM
Pass the morphine.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #789 1/1/09 -
Post by: 2NJSons_Mom on January 03, 2009, 04:37:38 PM
2NJSons_Mom

Please delete post #965.  I apologize.  I messed up.

Thanks

Janet

San wants to get to page 50....is it that bad????


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #789 1/1/09 -
Post by: San on January 03, 2009, 04:38:09 PM
Could use a little help in getting to page 50  ::MonkeyWink::
I could stir some more, if needed!

 ::MonkeyHaHa::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #789 1/1/09 -
Post by: 2NJSons_Mom on January 03, 2009, 04:38:59 PM
2NJSons_Mom

Please delete post #965.  I apologize.  I messed up.

Thanks

Janet

San wants to get to page 50....is it that bad????

Oh, I saw that...you just quoted and forgot to say something...no biggy in my book.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #789 1/1/09 -
Post by: San on January 03, 2009, 04:39:18 PM
(http://i34.photobucket.com/albums/d118/Sanddrops/Scared%20Monkeys/LOCKED2.gif)

Natalee Case Discussion #790 1/3/09 -

http://scaredmonkeys.net/index.php?topic=4344.0