Scared Monkeys Discussion Forum

Natalee Holloway => LCD Archive => Topic started by: Nut44x4 on January 09, 2009, 02:00:55 PM



Title: Natalee Case Discussion #793 1/13/09 - 1/18/09
Post by: Nut44x4 on January 09, 2009, 02:00:55 PM
http://i118.photobucket.com/albums/o100/klaasen3/Sub3/Natalee2.swf



JUSTICE FOR NATALEE


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #793
Post by: Tamikosmom on January 13, 2009, 11:55:49 PM
(http://i21.photobucket.com/albums/b258/texasmom55/Natalee/Carpes3truthandjusticefornatalee.jpg)


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #793
Post by: 2NJSons_Mom on January 13, 2009, 11:58:33 PM
 ::MonkeyDance::

 ::MonkeyHaHa::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #793
Post by: Keepthefaith on January 13, 2009, 11:58:59 PM
KEEPTHEFAITH


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #793
Post by: Keepthefaith on January 13, 2009, 11:59:43 PM
(http://i21.photobucket.com/albums/b258/texasmom55/Natalee/Carpes3truthandjusticefornatalee.jpg)

JUSTICE FOR NATALEE..KEEPTHEFAITH ::MonkeyCool::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #793
Post by: 2NJSons_Mom on January 14, 2009, 12:00:12 AM
KEEPTHEFAITH

We wouldn't be here if we didn't.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #793
Post by: klaasend on January 14, 2009, 12:00:29 AM
Thanks Nut 2NJ - I was off playing games aka hookie  ::MonkeyHaHa::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #793
Post by: 2NJSons_Mom on January 14, 2009, 12:01:21 AM
Thanks Nut - I was off playing games aka hookie  ::MonkeyHaHa::

Nut, my azz    ::MonkeyHaHa::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #793
Post by: texasmom on January 14, 2009, 12:02:50 AM
Thanks Nut - I was off playing games aka hookie  ::MonkeyHaHa::

Nut, my azz    ::MonkeyHaHa::

 ::MonkeyLaugh::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #793
Post by: wreck on January 14, 2009, 12:03:06 AM
Thanks Nut - I was off playing games aka hookie  ::MonkeyHaHa::

Nut, my azz    ::MonkeyHaHa::
::MonkeyCool::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #793
Post by: klaasend on January 14, 2009, 12:07:28 AM
Thanks Nut - I was off playing games aka hookie  ::MonkeyHaHa::

Nut, my azz    ::MonkeyHaHa::


Shoot, I do that all the time.  I'm sorry  ::MonkeyCool::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #793
Post by: texasmom on January 14, 2009, 12:07:37 AM
Thanks Nut - I was off playing games aka hookie  ::MonkeyHaHa::

Nut, my azz    ::MonkeyHaHa::
::MonkeyCool::

...details   ::MonkeyHaHa::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #793
Post by: 2NJSons_Mom on January 14, 2009, 12:08:59 AM
Thank you, guys.  I haven't done a thread change in a while. 

What we have hee aah is a failyah to communicate.   ::MonkeyHaHa::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #793
Post by: texasmom on January 14, 2009, 12:12:56 AM
Thank you, guys.  I haven't done a thread change in a while. 

What we have hee aah is a failyah to communicate.   ::MonkeyHaHa::

 ::MonkeyHaHa::  You were great 2NJ!   ::MonkeyCool::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #793
Post by: texasmom on January 14, 2009, 12:16:43 AM
1/14/2009 Awe Mainta Front Page

http://awemainta.com/home/

(http://i21.photobucket.com/albums/b258/texasmom55/Misc%20News%204/01142008AweMaintaFP.jpg)

mother of miss aruba dianne croes owing to fayece posiblemente owing to cause of dengue

yesterday owing to enter the tristo news cu mother of we miss aruba, dianne croes owing to fayece posiblemente debi at dengue, but this will have to wordo confirma still dentro of 2 for 3 week. is deal of madam angelica croes of barely 53 year cu was live at paradera y because; profesion the was juffrouw of scol at colegio san hose at santa cruz. awemainta can owing to compronde cu the family had plannan big for trip together y so give dianne all the sosten necesario during his participacion in miss universe. the father, that is acolyte of cuerpo policial y cu can cierto also is sufriendo of kebrante of salud, will owing to descend cu vervroegd pensioen y together cu his casa will have to was in the salon caminda the certamen of miss universe will take lugar at las vegas. instancianan of salubridad publico owing to give of conoce cu still not can confirma cu sra. angelica owing to fayece debi at dengue, already cu testnan in exterior have to wordo realiza for confirma this, y the can tarda among two for three week. awemainta is convivi cu the dolor of dianne y his family y is send palabrana of forza y condolencia for all family croes cu the perdida of they being keri.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #793 1/13/09
Post by: 2NJSons_Mom on January 14, 2009, 12:16:56 AM
See how easy it is to miss details?  Nut prepared the new thread.  I locked the old and opened the new which had her name on it.  Pretty slick. 


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #793 1/13/09
Post by: 2NJSons_Mom on January 14, 2009, 12:30:51 AM
G'nite, all.  See you later.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #793 1/13/09
Post by: crazybabyborg on January 14, 2009, 12:32:17 AM
See how easy it is to miss details?  Nut prepared the new thread.  I locked the old and opened the new which had her name on it.  Pretty slick. 

 ::MonkeyDance:: ::MonkeyDance:: ::MonkeyDance::

You slid that one right in, slick as a whistle!  ::MonkeyHaHa::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #793 1/13/09
Post by: wreck on January 14, 2009, 12:35:05 AM
Nite all!  ::MonkeyCool::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #793
Post by: klaasend on January 14, 2009, 12:36:37 AM
1/14/2009 Awe Mainta Front Page

http://awemainta.com/home/

(http://i21.photobucket.com/albums/b258/texasmom55/Misc%20News%204/01142008AweMaintaFP.jpg)

mother of miss aruba dianne croes owing to fayece posiblemente owing to cause of dengue

yesterday owing to enter the tristo news cu mother of we miss aruba, dianne croes owing to fayece posiblemente debi at dengue, but this will have to wordo confirma still dentro of 2 for 3 week. is deal of madam angelica croes of barely 53 year cu was live at paradera y because; profesion the was juffrouw of scol at colegio san hose at santa cruz. awemainta can owing to compronde cu the family had plannan big for trip together y so give dianne all the sosten necesario during his participacion in miss universe. the father, that is acolyte of cuerpo policial y cu can cierto also is sufriendo of kebrante of salud, will owing to descend cu vervroegd pensioen y together cu his casa will have to was in the salon caminda the certamen of miss universe will take lugar at las vegas. instancianan of salubridad publico owing to give of conoce cu still not can confirma cu sra. angelica owing to fayece debi at dengue, already cu testnan in exterior have to wordo realiza for confirma this, y the can tarda among two for three week. awemainta is convivi cu the dolor of dianne y his family y is send palabrana of forza y condolencia for all family croes cu the perdida of they being keri.

Wow, does this say that Miss Aruba's mother who was 53 died from the dengue?  How sad.  Small island to have this become an issue.  I know they have had dengue problems in the past.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #793 1/13/09
Post by: texasmom on January 14, 2009, 12:39:09 AM
Not a very good translation at all, but I think it means the new PG will investigate Rudy Croes claims against Van der Straten.  If someone could help with the translation, I would really appreciate it!

1/13/2009 Awe Mainta Page 6

http://awemainta.com/home/

(http://i21.photobucket.com/albums/b258/texasmom55/HollowayCaseNews1/01132009AweMaintaPg6-1.jpg)

pg will owing to cuminsa one investigacion informativo on acusacionnan of rudy croes  during conferencia of prensa semanal of faction avp, arthur dowers owing to comenta cu at instant cu minister of husticia owing to give indicacion cu sr. van der straten will was meti in owing to deal of stroba y sconde this after in the caso of natalee holloway, this owing to wordo cuestiona in parliament y owing to mustre cu the is one minister of husticia iresponsabel because do not believe cu one autoridad maximo of husticia of one country can haci one declaracion of the form descabeya so without cu the have sufficient proof. according dowers if the minister will had some indicacion earnest or proof, past will have to owing to acudi at ministerio publico y give instruccion for cuminsa one feitenonderzoek. hour the member of parliament owing to haci minister question on this, the minister owing to deny of contesta if the had cualkier indicacion earnest for her acusacionnan cu past owing to haci. past owing to tell if in parliament cu sr. van der straten owing to molesti’e by cu past owing to haci cierto declaracionnan for thing is deal maneho of husticia at aruba. because; cu past owing to sinti’e fastioso by of esey the hour ey past owing to achieve is good for acusa van der straten because the also wanted owing to molesti’e. esey was the respues cu rudy croes owing to give arthur dowers in parliament y owing to agrega cu the do not give more informacion. member of parliament of avp can owing to compronde week happen cu the minister owing to wordo suplica for procurador general for her not talk more y also cu pg will owing to cuminsa cu one investigacion informativo if the acusacionnan here have base. dowers is lamenta cu the minister of husticia here owing to cause one damage extremely big at country aruba by of owing to throw the acusacionnan here in one form descabeya y after can owing to see cu politiconan opportunist derechista y fundamentalista owing to piki esakinan y owing to hibanan till in medionan of comunicacion internacional. also the is lamenta cu none member of parliament of mep owing to reclama the minister here in parliament for thing past owing to haci.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #793 1/13/09
Post by: texasmom on January 14, 2009, 12:40:09 AM


Goodnight 2NJ, and wreck!   ::MonkeyCool::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #793
Post by: texasmom on January 14, 2009, 12:41:56 AM
1/14/2009 Awe Mainta Front Page

http://awemainta.com/home/

(http://i21.photobucket.com/albums/b258/texasmom55/Misc%20News%204/01142008AweMaintaFP.jpg)

mother of miss aruba dianne croes owing to fayece posiblemente owing to cause of dengue

yesterday owing to enter the tristo news cu mother of we miss aruba, dianne croes owing to fayece posiblemente debi at dengue, but this will have to wordo confirma still dentro of 2 for 3 week. is deal of madam angelica croes of barely 53 year cu was live at paradera y because; profesion the was juffrouw of scol at colegio san hose at santa cruz. awemainta can owing to compronde cu the family had plannan big for trip together y so give dianne all the sosten necesario during his participacion in miss universe. the father, that is acolyte of cuerpo policial y cu can cierto also is sufriendo of kebrante of salud, will owing to descend cu vervroegd pensioen y together cu his casa will have to was in the salon caminda the certamen of miss universe will take lugar at las vegas. instancianan of salubridad publico owing to give of conoce cu still not can confirma cu sra. angelica owing to fayece debi at dengue, already cu testnan in exterior have to wordo realiza for confirma this, y the can tarda among two for three week. awemainta is convivi cu the dolor of dianne y his family y is send palabrana of forza y condolencia for all family croes cu the perdida of they being keri.

Wow, does this say that Miss Aruba's mother who was 53 died from the dengue?  How sad.  Small island to have this become an issue.  I know they have had dengue problems in the past.

That's how I understand it Klaas, will not be confirmed for 2-3 weeks; I guess more tests to be sure that was the cause.  That is very sad. 


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #793 1/13/09
Post by: texasmom on January 14, 2009, 12:57:23 AM
This is more about the Front Page story...

1/14/2009 Awe Mainta Page 3

http://awemainta.com/home/

(http://i21.photobucket.com/albums/b258/texasmom55/Misc%20News%204/01142009AweMaintaPg3-1.jpg)

dengue owing to cuminsa cobra life of victima at aruba have to keep among two for three week for achieve confirmacion yesterday owing to convoca one conferencia of prensa urgente at departamento of salud publico for atende the exercise of dengue, mirando cu fayecimento of one madam posiblemente owing to cause of dengue owing to arise all one conmocion at we island. is deal here of madam angelica croes, live at paradera y mother of we miss aruba dianne croes.durante the conferencia owing to indica cu yesterday marduga one madam owing to fayece y cu is one caso sospechoso of dengue. till at the momentonan here departamento of salud not owing to achieve the confirmacion, because have to haci cierto testnan. by of this will have to keep 2 for 3 week for achieve the resultadonan. sra. koolman, boss of the departamento of malesanan contagioso owing to indica cu they owing to achieve much call yesterday debi at the caso here among another. the is indica cu hour have casonan sospechoso y confirma of dengue they're haci bishitanan at home for busca more informacion of pakico the person owing to wordo contagia. near of this is informa gkmb for they can haci they work.di november for now owing to haci various visit at home, owing to let various carta behind at casnan pidiendo for take contacto cu the departamento, but the hendenan not was reacciona. but yesterday, after cu the news owing to leave cu problablemente one person will owing to fayece of dengue, of trip the personanan owing to cuminsa calling y tell cu they owing to achieve the carta. sra. koolman is believe cu is good cu hendenan owing to reacciona, but they have to owing to reacciona previous to y not keep till algo more important happen. if the meldingnan enter as have to is can take pasonan y evita situacionnan more important. in the caso of the madam cu owing to fayece, the melding owing to enter till yesterday morning for of hospital hour past owing to fayece end.gkmb owing to indica of his near cu they owing to come is haci controlnan, is let avisonan at cierto casnan y owing to come is fumigando in various area part nightfall for night. also saturday they're bishitando the casnan cu was close during week. near of esakinan they're much bezig cu informacion tocante dengue via various medionan. sr. cristiaans of gkmb is tell cu is regrettable cu at much of the casnan still is achieve much criadero. once more owing to ask comunidad for check rond of cas, haci cas clean, not let water stop, because without aid of comunidad they not can.wilmer salazar, doctor of salubridad publico papiando of the caso of the madam cu owing to fayece posiblemente debi at dengue, owing to tell cu owing to visit cas of the madam for achieve informacion y owing to come achieve know cu the madam for of diaranson week happen had sintomanan of kentura, but none sangramento y niether none sintoma of alarma or alerta. monday past will owing to arise one some mihor y inclusive past owing to bay work y yesterday past owing to present one shock y owing to die. today will realiza autopsia of the curpa of the madam cu had 53 year of edad. the material of the autopsia will wordo send for one laboratory of investigacion in exterior for detecta if provided that berdad the madam had dengue or cualkier another ailment cu can owing to complica. all the time have to menciona cu casa of the madam also is bad y the is under control medico caminda cu the pasonan necesario owing to wordo take end. informacionnan cu awemainta owing to achieve for of one fountain of departamento of salud is indica cu gkmb at the momentonan here not have material for combati dengue, cu all the quimiconan owing to end y owing to pesar cu is deal of one situation much alarming, minister booshi wever (ainda) does not company for busca the material here.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #793 1/13/09
Post by: texasmom on January 14, 2009, 01:11:26 AM
1/14/2009 Awe Mainta Page 2 
(Date at top of article is from June 2007, I didn't see anything in yesterday's paper concerning this; maybe I missed it or maybe it's an old article....but found some things in the article interesting so I thought I'd put it out here)

http://awemainta.com/home/

(http://i21.photobucket.com/albums/b258/texasmom55/Misc%20News%204/01142009AweMaintaPg2-1.jpg)

question cu is being haci what is clase of “screening” had of the mericanonan paul owing to. moore y fred gillman that owing to percura for they permission?
after of the publicacion of yesterday, cu have 2 caso in corte at merca encuanto of one caso of fraude, cu can cause problem earnest at the aruban resort and casino, is much reaccion we of awemainta owing to achieve. one of the questions cu we redaccion owing to achieve is, what is clase of “screening” y that owing to haci the “screening” of the personanan cu owing to enter aruba for cumpra the hotel y casino, bao of name of kli resort development. the socionan, paul owing to. moore y fred gillman owing to resulta of is two boef very big self, y is just they two owing to amarga life of much employee of dicho hotel, mandando aruban cas y for place they mericanonan work the.o. in departamento of throw of timeshare. after of the publicacion, much t’e reaccionnan cu owing to enter of part of the “bond-holdernan”, bao of cua have incluso some fundacion aruban, kendenan owing to lose very coin end. day cu the.o. the bond-holdernan of the aruban resort & casino owing to reuni, cu the inversionistanan new here, they owing to tell, cu they not can pay nothing the instant ey, but for give they one period of 5 year for work cu the coin, for after cuminsa pay bek, but without none clase of interest. con this can was possible, without cu banco central was know this, cu as menciona, is one tactica of mafia. the hendenan here owing to mafia very person one cantidad of coin y today, debi at they diferencianan, will not go back y the hotel y casino here is condena at close his portanan proximamente, because is that is bay dirigi the hotel y casino here? for of hendenan at aruba, kendenan cu owing to become victima of the modus operandi mafioso here, is culpa the.o. gobierno actual, mencionando name of minister of husticia, rudy croes y of minister of dimas, drs. booshi wever p’e calamidad here. they departamentonan, cu have to owing to haci one mihor evaluacion of the hendenan here, “wowo” close owing to dijes company “bij ‘t kruisje”, y today can see the consecuencia here. another cuestionamento in the caso here is, kico the curator his paper self was in the caso here? have even voznan is arise cu ministerio publico “ambtshalve” have to let haci one investigacion of all the form con the “benta” of the hotel y casino, cu today we conoce because; the aruban resort y key largo casino. have indicacion of much iregularidad, y as the denuncianan cu we is hayando at we redaccion, not can permiti cu the hendenan here leave without castigo, where the.o. one cantidad of bondholder is cla for reclama they coin, cu they owing to inverti. one caso assure much earnest, y cu can spite name of aruba also internacionalmente.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #793 1/13/09
Post by: texasmom on January 14, 2009, 01:22:44 AM
1/14/2009 Awe Mainta Page 3

http://awemainta.com/home/

(http://i21.photobucket.com/albums/b258/texasmom55/Misc%20News%204/01142009AweMaintaPage3_1.jpg)

Papiamentu translation:

will give boet of immediate at all esnan cu stay deteni ministerio publico is sostene zero tolerancia of polis: abort for achieve cu satisfaccion ministerio publico did take notice of the mature cu the cantidad of incidente caminda owing to comete hechonan castigable, owing to stay limita during fakkeloptocht. ministerio publico is haci one call at comunidad for follow in the liñea here y for not spite the gladness of carnaval cu destruccionnan, violencia y another comportacion inaceptable. for promove one carnaval exitoso, police owing to anuncia end the maneho of zero tolerancia. ministerio publico owing to dicidi for sostene the zero tolerancia of police cu his own maneho abort do you achieve (“lik op stuk-beleid”). esey wanted mean cu everybody cu wordo deteni for delitonan simple during carnaval, will achieve one boet self hour. if the boet here wordo pay, then the caso will stay termina. if the not wordo pay, then the person will achieve one citacion for her tratamento of 2 of april future. claro cu if person stay without pay the boet, the exigencia of castigo during the tratamento will is more high. if a comete hechonan castigable earnest, then have to as cuenta cu the will wordo deteni y posiblemente stay close. the hour ey can forget numa on participacion at carnaval. ministerio publico is much preocupa tocante the usage excesivo of alcohol during carnaval. the call here is also ensera one limitacion on the usage of alcohol. in majority of incidente is alcohol is motibo of perdida of tino y of control, cu all consecuencia cu this is trece cune. alcohol is spite more cu are you believe. not let alcohol perhudica carnaval of you y of you sernan keri.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #793 1/13/09
Post by: Edward on January 14, 2009, 01:49:42 AM
Buckeye
   Re: Natalee Case Discussion #792 1/9/09 -
« Reply #971 on: Today at 10:47:20 PM » 

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Just a couple comments before bed:

After looking at pictures, we decided it was not Comemencia on the Persistence.

Jossy's brother is not on the Dairio boardI believe that Louis is Jossy's son.

Oduber did go after Jossy and called for a  boycott of the paper.  I'm not so sure everyone is afraid of him.


Mansur is known for his weekly editorials which are often critical of the local government of Prime Minister Nelson Oduber. The ongoing disagreement between Mansur and Oduber dates back many years. During the election campaign in 2001, Oduber's party even had stickers made stating "Don’t believe Diario."

In 1999 Jossy Mansur and his brother Luis Mansur sued the Netherlands government before the United Nations Human Rights Committee.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jossy_Mansur

Arrests in Aruba September 24, 2007

Today in Aruba, some 120 police officers from ALE, KLPD, Antillean Arrest Team and Dutch investigators arrested Luis Mansur, brother of Jossy Mansur and 8 other persons in connection with money laundering, drug trafficking, bribery and other charges.

One of the suspects is the well-known businessman Luis Mansur (63)

in another case..
The suit alleges that Ezell's and Podhurst Orseck's errors in the case allowed the investment managers of the property, brothers Luis and Elias Mansur, to abscond with the profits from the island's $15 million sale in May 2004.

The plaintiffs have "clearly been damaged," their attorney, Daniel Koch, of Koch & Trushin in Fort Lauderdale, Fla., said in an interview.

where is all the money ? Con Artists !!
http://www.law.com/jsp/article.jsp?id=1148547934537

Luis & Sara Masur own the Casino.and "sold" the LaCabana into timeshares.. Jossy is Luis's Brother.
if you look closely .. it a long term Lease Deal they have with the Aruban Govt.on the land and with the Timeshare owners.
They are very "Slick" ;^)
SandraK 


Wednesday afternoon as the restyled and dramatic pool was re-introduced at La Cabana an important transfer of assets was taking place downtown at the office of Civil Law Notary Bodeker. Developers Luis Mansur & Sara Mansur transferred ownership of the real estate assets to 15.000 on-island/off-island owners, the time share members of the resort.
http://www.visitaruba.com/facts/newsdesk/backissues/newsletter50.html


As already mentioned, Luis Mansur is sentenced to 7 years’ imprisonment instead of 10 as demanded by the OM. The judge said that Mansur acted as if the dealing in drugs was very normal.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #793 1/13/09
Post by: texasmom on January 14, 2009, 01:55:18 AM
1/14/2009 Awe Mainta Pg 31

http://awemainta.com/home/

(http://i21.photobucket.com/albums/b258/texasmom55/Misc%20News%204/01142009AweMaintaPg31-1.jpg)

Papiamentu translation:

choler is ofrece tourist for cumpra drugs monday nightfall, in careda of 6 or, two tourist cu owing to end of leave of one bar is ask asistencia of police, because; cu one choler owing to send they cu boter. hour cu they owing to talk cu police they owing to declara cu one choler owing to ask about they for cumpra drugs. hour cu they owing to deny, the choler owing to angry y owing to send they cu boter. they owing to give police descripcion of the choler. police owing to busca in becindario, y not owing to come across cune. but police owing to come across cu one another choler j.e. that also is sell drugs y owing to core cune for of the sitio.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #793 1/13/09
Post by: texasmom on January 14, 2009, 02:04:14 AM
 ::MonkeyShocked:: ::MonkeyNoNo::

1/14/2009 Awe Mainta Page 31

http://awemainta.com/home/

(http://i21.photobucket.com/albums/b258/texasmom55/Misc%20News%204/01142009AweMaintaPg31_2.jpg)

Papiamentu translation:

again ladronnan is enter in bedroom of hotel presencia of strand-politie owing to wordo ask monday 9’or of night, at one highrise hotel, where one tourist owing to achieve two man desconoci in his bedroom. n’e sitio police is talk cu one tourist muher of 40 year, that is tell police cu hour cu past owing to enter in his bedroom past owing to come across cu two man desconoci dress at black in his bedroom. hour cu they owing to mire, they owing to fly for of the window of three floor y disparce. they owing to bay cu one laptop y one i-phone cu they owing to let cay on vlur. the tourist owing to tell police cu past owing to see one his cara good very well. past owing to tell cu they owing to bay cu 300 dollar y also one another i-phone. the caso is in investigacion.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #793 1/13/09
Post by: billb's daughter on January 14, 2009, 02:23:59 AM
Kermit,
I know this may not be a popular view,
But do we know that kyle was not just making drama to promote a sale of his pics/rov video to the highest network bidder? As far as I have read, there is no evidence that clearly points to Natalee's (or anyone else) remains was in the cage.  Yes, I know there is probable cause to suspect something is amiss wrt the persistence search, but without due process of potential evidence recovered from the cage, there is no way to ascertain the contents of the cage.
I think what kyle did was despicable, and what persistence did by asking for contributions in the name of Justice for Natalee was/is despicable,  but without evidence, that is all we have, nothing more. Is it, or is it not Natalee? We can't know, based on the info provided to date.
Pursuing the human trafficking angle may be all we have at the moment, and I hope JQK can push it forward. Another angle may be whatever Peter DV's comes up with in his next segment.....greta, where are you?......


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #793 1/13/09
Post by: texasmom on January 14, 2009, 02:29:50 AM



Hi billb!  Good to see you!   ::MonkeyCool::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #793 1/13/09
Post by: billb's daughter on January 14, 2009, 02:31:32 AM
Goodnight texasmom, Icehawk and 0 Guests are viewing this topic.
OK...forget the guests.... ::MonkeyCool::
Hi TM and Icehawk.....so where do you get the Icehawk label?


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #793 1/13/09
Post by: billb's daughter on January 14, 2009, 02:32:52 AM



Hi billb!  Good to see you!   ::MonkeyCool::
You 2 TM....
I always arrive when most are in their Monkey bunkeys....


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #793 1/13/09
Post by: billb's daughter on January 14, 2009, 02:35:05 AM



Hi billb!  Good to see you!   ::MonkeyCool::
I've seen PI here a few times, and some have said Hi to him....any response from PI to the Hi's?
I think he wants to say something....just waiting for the right time.......


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #793 1/13/09
Post by: texasmom on January 14, 2009, 02:43:09 AM



Hi billb!  Good to see you!   ::MonkeyCool::
I've seen PI here a few times, and some have said Hi to him....any response from PI to the Hi's?
I think he wants to say something....just waiting for the right time.......

No comments from PI yet...sniff...sniff.  I hope you're right.  Janet and I were afraid we skeered him with my hi's and her big hugs so we're going to be really quiet and only give hi's after he says hello, and hugs when he asks for them from now on...


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #793 1/13/09
Post by: texasmom on January 14, 2009, 02:51:24 AM


Cageman,
I've been very curious since your comment about being involved in forensics.  Have you seen the pictures that were reportedly taken by the ROV on board the Persistence?  If so, would you be willing to share your thoughts on the photos?  If you're not comfortable doing so for any reason I understand.  I would just like to know your opinion if you are willing to share it.

Thanks in advance.

tm


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #793 1/13/09
Post by: billb's daughter on January 14, 2009, 02:52:44 AM



Hi billb!  Good to see you!   ::MonkeyCool::
I've seen PI here a few times, and some have said Hi to him....any response from PI to the Hi's?
I think he wants to say something....just waiting for the right time.......

No comments from PI yet...sniff...sniff.  I hope you're right.  Janet and I were afraid we skeered him with my hi's and her big hugs so we're going to be really quiet and only give hi's after he says hello, and hugs when he asks for them from now on...
You know TM, I KTF.....PI will post when he is ready.....he visits because he wants to let us know what is in the mix, but the timing may just not be right....The point is...PI (I hope I am not overstepping PI..It is not my intent) is viewing here because he knows SM is here for Justice for Natalee.....SM/Red/Klaas and way too many Monkeys to mention (they don't need mention-they need Justice for Natalee).
I (along with all esteemed colleagues/Monkeys) STAND WITH THE GIRL!!!
 


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #793 1/13/09
Post by: texasmom on January 14, 2009, 03:03:57 AM



Hi billb!  Good to see you!   ::MonkeyCool::
I've seen PI here a few times, and some have said Hi to him....any response from PI to the Hi's?
I think he wants to say something....just waiting for the right time.......

No comments from PI yet...sniff...sniff.  I hope you're right.  Janet and I were afraid we skeered him with my hi's and her big hugs so we're going to be really quiet and only give hi's after he says hello, and hugs when he asks for them from now on...
You know TM, I KTF.....PI will post when he is ready.....he visits because he wants to let us know what is in the mix, but the timing may just not be right....The point is...PI (I hope I am not overstepping PI..It is not my intent) is viewing here because he knows SM is here for Justice for Natalee.....SM/Red/Klaas and way too many Monkeys to mention (they don't need mention-they need Justice for Natalee).
I (along with all esteemed colleagues/Monkeys) STAND WITH THE GIRL!!!
 

Thanks billb!  That makes me feel better.  Reminds me of this old guy that was here during the Persistence search...some really tense times...he told me to sing Christmas songs.  IIRC it was almost February, but that was o.k.; it made me feel better.  I've been thinking a lot about that, so much that I still have my Christmas tree up!  And I've been humming a Christmas song or two every once in a while just to keep my spirits up. 

Keeping the Faith, and Standing with the Girl!!!!  ::MonkeyDance::



Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #793 1/13/09
Post by: texasmom on January 14, 2009, 03:08:41 AM
(http://i21.photobucket.com/albums/b258/texasmom55/Natalee/CarpePicNatalee1.png)

JUSTICE FOR NATALEE!!!!!!


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #793 1/13/09
Post by: billb's daughter on January 14, 2009, 03:09:10 AM



Hi billb!  Good to see you!   ::MonkeyCool::
I've seen PI here a few times, and some have said Hi to him....any response from PI to the Hi's?
I think he wants to say something....just waiting for the right time.......

No comments from PI yet...sniff...sniff.  I hope you're right.  Janet and I were afraid we skeered him with my hi's and her big hugs so we're going to be really quiet and only give hi's after he says hello, and hugs when he asks for them from now on...
You know TM, I KTF.....PI will post when he is ready.....he visits because he wants to let us know what is in the mix, but the timing may just not be right....The point is...PI (I hope I am not overstepping PI..It is not my intent) is viewing here because he knows SM is here for Justice for Natalee.....SM/Red/Klaas and way too many Monkeys to mention (they don't need mention-they need Justice for Natalee).
I (along with all esteemed colleagues/Monkeys) STAND WITH THE GIRL!!!
 

Thanks billb!  That makes me feel better.  Reminds me of this old guy that was here during the Persistence search...some really tense times...he told me to sing Christmas songs.  IIRC it was almost February, but that was o.k.; it made me feel better.  I've been thinking a lot about that, so much that I still have my Christmas tree up!  And I've been humming a Christmas song or two every once in a while just to keep my spirits up. 

Keeping the Faith, and Standing with the Girl!!!!  ::MonkeyDance::


KTF will like this...that is why I put her in... ::MonkeyCool::
It's all cool.....we are here for Natalee, Beth, Dave.....if it helps, I'll keep my Christmas tree up forever...,
Heck, next round of Christmas Carols are on me!!! .... ::MonkeyDance:: ::MonkeyCool:: ::MonkeyDance::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #793 1/13/09
Post by: texasmom on January 14, 2009, 03:16:37 AM



Hi billb!  Good to see you!   ::MonkeyCool::
I've seen PI here a few times, and some have said Hi to him....any response from PI to the Hi's?
I think he wants to say something....just waiting for the right time.......

No comments from PI yet...sniff...sniff.  I hope you're right.  Janet and I were afraid we skeered him with my hi's and her big hugs so we're going to be really quiet and only give hi's after he says hello, and hugs when he asks for them from now on...
You know TM, I KTF.....PI will post when he is ready.....he visits because he wants to let us know what is in the mix, but the timing may just not be right....The point is...PI (I hope I am not overstepping PI..It is not my intent) is viewing here because he knows SM is here for Justice for Natalee.....SM/Red/Klaas and way too many Monkeys to mention (they don't need mention-they need Justice for Natalee).
I (along with all esteemed colleagues/Monkeys) STAND WITH THE GIRL!!!
 

Thanks billb!  That makes me feel better.  Reminds me of this old guy that was here during the Persistence search...some really tense times...he told me to sing Christmas songs.  IIRC it was almost February, but that was o.k.; it made me feel better.  I've been thinking a lot about that, so much that I still have my Christmas tree up!  And I've been humming a Christmas song or two every once in a while just to keep my spirits up. 

Keeping the Faith, and Standing with the Girl!!!!  ::MonkeyDance::


KTF will like this...that is why I put her in... ::MonkeyCool::
It's all cool.....we are here for Natalee, Beth, Dave.....if it helps, I'll keep my Christmas tree up forever...,
Heck, next round of Christmas Carols are on me!!! .... ::MonkeyDance:: ::MonkeyCool:: ::MonkeyDance::

Yep, KTF will be wired for sound when she sees these posts...we'll probably start another countdown!   ::MonkeyHaHa::

That's o.k, whatever it takes to keep us all asking questions, looking for answers, and sticking to the task at hand!  None of it can be wrong when our hearts are in the right place, looking for Justice for a precious girl and her family.

I'd better hit the monkey bunkey myself...almost time to get up and do it all again!

Goodnight billb!   ::MonkeyCool::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #793 1/13/09
Post by: texasmom on January 14, 2009, 03:30:30 AM
I hope everyone had a chance to hear this one over the Christmas season, I think it's a great message any time!

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1w1IwQZPOmM



     J4N    ::MonkeyCool::



Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #793 1/13/09
Post by: MumInOhio on January 14, 2009, 05:05:35 AM
Morning Johan!

Edward...Two Luis Mansurs - The son and the brother. No three, another around Joran's age!

Sorry, no notes, again, but there is a lot of info on the internet on the Mansur family relationships. Will tell you whom is related to whom and how.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #793
Post by: Nut44x4 on January 14, 2009, 07:37:44 AM
Thank you, guys.  I haven't done a thread change in a while. 

What we have hee aah is a failyah to communicate.   ::MonkeyHaHa::

 ::MonkeyHaHa::  You were great 2NJ!   ::MonkeyCool::

YEAH 2NJ!! I was drooling on my pillow when all this went down  ::MonkeyHaHa::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #793 1/13/09
Post by: wingnut on January 14, 2009, 08:24:41 AM
Quote
Blue Moon
Scared Monkey

 Offline

Posts: 1253



   Re: Natalee Case Discussion #792 1/9/09 -
« Reply #933 on: January 13, 2009, 08:33:37 PM » 

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Article I found (a snippet of it follows):

Superior Offshore International Comments on Putative Class-Action Lawsuits

HOUSTON, March 5, 2008 /PRNewswire-FirstCall via COMTEX News Network/ -- Superior Offshore International, Inc. (Nasdaq: DEEP) today announced that several putative class-action lawsuits have been filed against the Company alleging violations of the federal securities laws. Superior Offshore believes that each of these lawsuits is without merit and the Company will vigorously defend itself.

this location: 
http://ir.superioroffshore.com/releasedetail.cfm?ReleaseID=297883


***This was March 5th, 2008.  What date were we (as in everyone, everywhere) requested to make donations to continue the search?
http://scaredmonkeys.net/index.php?topic=4363.920



FEBRUARY 2008  

Quote
oceanexploration
Scared Monkey

 Offline

Posts: 224



   Re: Natalee Case Discussion #744 3/19 -
« Reply #468 on: March 20, 2008, 04:24:34 PM » 

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Quote
Quote from: SS on March 20, 2008, 04:11:07 PM
Hi Kyle,

At the end of February, we were trying very hard to hustle contributions for the Persistence.
  We had heard that funds were low and an appeal for donations was posted on the Persistence website.  About a week later, we learned that Persistence was returning to Louisiana.  Can you share any information with us about any possible plans to renew the search off of Aruba?  We know that there are still many sites that you need to check.  Are there any plans at this point to return? I can't imagine for a second that Dave is ready to stop.  We sure aren't ready to stop.  Do the Dutch/Arubans have any detailed information about the locations of the sites that you have identified?  Can you share with us how much information you were required to give them in exchange for permission to search in their waters?  Can you also give us an idea of the attitude of the sandflies toward you and the search team?


Greetings,

First, thank you for your tireless efforts and dedication.  The Persistence leaving Aruba was strictly due to the fact that it's work there was complete.  Don't hear me wrong. We completed the side scan sonar search of the entire planned area.  We did an initial round of ROV dives with the Persistence which was on the order of 65 dives.  The final round of ROV dives was to inspect everything not inspected in the remaining area of the search grid.  The Persistence is very expensive and over-kill to keep on site when all we need is to dive on targets with an ROV.  It is best to return the Persistence to it's home and bring in an ROV boat or dive boat to complete the dives.  It's more efficient this way without the extra personnel and equipment out in the field. 
I just got off the phone with Tim Trahan a few minutes ago talking about returning to dive on the remaining targets.  There are plans to return, we just need to figure out the details of when and how.  The "how" question will help us figure out how much more funds we need to raise, if any.  I'm not involved in this.
The Arubans and Dutch never requested any information on our locations and don't have the target list(s).  They obviously know where the trap is because the Aruban dive division dove on the trap with us. From what I experienced, their attitude towards us was never anything other than professional, friendly, courteous, and positive.  By "they", I mean the Aruban dive division, coast guard, and port authority. I didn't come across any sand flies.   

http://scaredmonkeys.net/index.php?topic=2721.msg367214#msg367214


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #793 1/13/09
Post by: Fox on January 14, 2009, 08:26:51 AM
Good Morning Monkeys,

Up and Atom!


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #793 1/13/09
Post by: jen3560 on January 14, 2009, 08:27:34 AM
keepthefaith,

#947 on: Today at 09:55:59 PM   keepthefaith

Do we have the backgrounds on those involved in the lawsuit with superior offshore?
http://scaredmonkeys.net/index.php?topic=4363.940   

Superior Offshore International, Inc. -- DEEPA short history and what looks to be a copy of  the documents is located here

http://securities.stanford.edu/1039/DEEP_01/


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #793 1/13/09
Post by: jen3560 on January 14, 2009, 08:28:43 AM
Wingnut - don't forget also about Silvetti's posts at BFN (and those of his sister).  I have those posts of his somewhere.............let me find them.

They were made soliciting monies long after the Persistence made it back home to Louisiana.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #793 1/13/09
Post by: wingnut on January 14, 2009, 08:42:47 AM
Wingnut - don't forget also about Silvetti's posts at BFN (and those of his sister).  I have those posts of his somewhere.............let me find them.

They were made soliciting monies long after the Persistence made it back home to Louisiana.


TRUE, Jen - the request for funds started before the Persistence left the waters of Aruba, and continued well after her return to Louisiana.  BUT - why would you solicit donations if your company is days away from class action litigation - which is the death blow to your ability to fund such an endeavor?  With all these shenanigans taking place (securities violations, bankruptcy, class action lawsuits) the possibility that the Persistence or ANY boat being able to complete the search (LOL) was slim to none. 


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #793 1/13/09
Post by: jen3560 on January 14, 2009, 09:03:36 AM
Wingnut - don't forget also about Silvetti's posts at BFN (and those of his sister).  I have those posts of his somewhere.............let me find them.

They were made soliciting monies long after the Persistence made it back home to Louisiana.


TRUE, Jen - the request for funds started before the Persistence left the waters of Aruba, and continued well after her return to Louisiana.  BUT - why would you solicit donations if your company is days away from class action litigation - which is the death blow to your ability to fund such an endeavor?   With all these shenanigans taking place (securities violations, bankruptcy, class action lawsuits) the possibility that the Persistence or ANY boat being able to complete the search (LOL) was slim to none. 


And WHY would you be looking for another boat - when Silvetti himself (and Shaefer) had others that could do the job?

Here are the posts from Silvetti and his sister at BFN soliciting funds..............in APRIL 2008.


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
 
http://blogsfornatalee.com/forum/index.php?topic=8476.msg334979#msg334979

LegallyLex Hero Member Posts: 551
John Silvetti, the Persistence and the Search for Natalee «
on: April 03, 2008, 06:46:44 PM »

Hey everyone, I am finally getting my brother John Silvetti on here in a few minutes. If you have any questions about the Persistence and search that he may answer, I am sure he will... (if it isn't confidential) Give me a few minutes!



jdsurveyor1 Newbie Posts: 11
John Silvetti, the Persistence and the Search for Natalee «
Reply #4 on: April 03, 2008, 07:19:47 PM »

I would like to give everyone at BFN an update on where we stand. The Persistence completed surveying the initial and extended grids. Basically, this means that the sonar survey was completed. Over 275 targets of interest were picked up and analyzed by the sonar interpreters. Only 25% of the targets were investigated by the ROV. At that point, we had run out of money and weather. Louis Schaefer committed a very generous amount of money towards the survey and the rest of us absorbed what we could. However, that was all based on the initial survey grid. Once the grid tripled, obviously so did our committments. (Jen's words here - the grid tripled because Richardson got Silvetti on his side, saying they needed to keep looking - but in DEEPER WATERS, and this was immediately after they found THE trap) The weather had continually increased until we were constantly facing 20 ft. seas. The Persistence can handle 20 foot seas, however, it is very dangerous for the crew and impossible to collect data. It was taking us 3 days to complete what took us only 1 day the month before. It was time to call it off. This was a very difficult thing to do as we had all prepared ourselves to either find Natalee or not. None of us were prepared to leave not knowing one way or the other. I believe once the reality set in that we were going to leave without knowing, that was the lowest point in morale of the entire trip. It took a few days for everyone to shake it off and complete what we could.


jdsurveyor1 Newbie Posts: 11
John Silvetti, the Persistence and the Search for Natalee «
Reply #10 on: April 03, 2008, 07:34:08 PM »

Thank you Jamie for your kind words. You must realize that the support that everyone posted daily kept us upbeat and working. You all were truly there with us. We are currently looking for an ROV vessel we can work with to return to complete the target investigations later in the year. I just returned last night from New England where I looked at a vessel that was being considered to do this with[/b].(Jen's words - why not one of his own vessels?  Or one of Shaefer's?  Like perhaps one of the vessels Shaefer sold, but then leased back?)   The surveyors from the Persistence were also working with the Maritime Police and Prosecutor's Office utilizing bottom scanning sonar in ponds and murky bodies of water. This is ongoing, however, the strike on the island has brought this to a halt until the strike is settled. Rumors claim this may happen on Monday.


Debbie AdministratorHero Member Posts: 26257
John Silvetti, the Persistence and the Search for Natalee «
Reply #12 on: April 03, 2008, 07:42:21 PM »

John, what can we do to insure that the search is completed?Also, when the cage was found that was shown on Dateline (pictures also hit the internet) what thoughts, emotions, etc... went through your mind? Can you elaborate on that for us? Thanks!


jdsurveyor1 Newbie Posts: 11
John Silvetti, the Persistence and the Search for Natalee «
Reply #13 on: April 03, 2008, 07:52:13 PM »

The important thing is to raise funds. It will require corporate support as well as private donations. Dave and Beth have been doing a great job getting the word out and while I was on the island, Dave put me in contact with the head of the Hotel Association who is working on raising a sizeable amount. So many on the island are supporting our efforts as well as people from all over the world.The media really blew the cage out of proportion. Although the cage initially provided some moments of "what is in there", I warned all on board that none of this information was to leave the boat. It was very suspect that a cage of this size was found where it was on the seafloor relative to the coast. My feelings were this was highly unusual and probably had something to do with something, but not what we were after. (Jen's words - remember, according to Caps, it was Silvetti himself who first suggested the trap was EMPTY, and was likely a drug post office.  Yet Kyle's professional analysis told us that cage had NO recent activity to indicate such - including lack of anchor scars on the sea floor for boats to maintain position while a diver went down, no disturbance of the sand covering the remains, etc) It was decided that the cage would be investigated further by divers, however, it was designated as only a target of interest. The crew moved onto other targets. Unfortunately, inexperience and frustration led to premature statements, including that we had found her.(Jen's words - here John Silvetti is calling Tim Miller inexperienced.  HA!) I don't think anyone was more upset than I that this information came off the boat and caused the Holloway family more grief!


LegallyLex Hero Member Posts: 551
John Silvetti, the Persistence and the Search for Natalee «
Reply #15 on: April 03, 2008, 07:55:25 PM »

John, a lot of BFN posters have asked me how much money would be needed to complete the search. Can you provide an estimate on what amount would be needed?


jdsurveyor1 Newbie Posts: 11
John Silvetti, the Persistence and the Search for Natalee «

Reply #16 on: April 03, 2008, 07:58:19 PM »

It is very difficult to say, since Louis has not selected a ROV vessel and we do not know how much of a humanitarian discount we can count on by the vessel and ROV owners, but my guess is that we will be looking at around 1 million dollars  
----------------------------

And here is a statement from Luis Shaefer the end of February - AFTER Shaefer had sent Kyle back to the states to broker a deal for the cage contents footage, and AFTER Shaefer knew the Persistence was already planning to leave Aruba:

Holloway searchers need helpThursday, February 28, 2008 | 8:21 PM

By Cynthia Cisneros

KEMAH, TX (KTRK) -- It's been almost three years since Natalee Holloway disappeared in Aruba on a class trip. But searchers have not given up hope.

A Kemah businessman has been on the front lines of the search for Natalee, spending over a million dollars of his own money. Over the past four months, he's paid for an underwater search.

The morning we were there, Louis Schafer was signing a wire transfer for $250,000. The money used to operate a sophisticated, deep sea survey boat, named the Persistence.

"I've dedicated a million dollars, I've gone way above that," said Louis Schafer of Underwater Expeditions. "I feel like it's time to ask for help from the American people that want to see this case solved."

The Persistence has been used every day since November to survey the ocean floor near Aruba. It uses remote operated vehicles, called ROVs, to sweep the ocean depths. What they've been able to accomplish is astounding.

"By Friday, we will have surveyed the entire 50-square mile off Aruba," Schafer said. "We have identified at least 60 of the targets. we have about 150 more targets to inspect."

Natalee Holloway traveled to Aruba two years ago to celebrate her high school graduation and disappeared. Natalee was last seen with Joran Van der Sloot who says he does not know what happened to her.

Schafer made a fortune in the deep sea diving business for oil rig removal and installation. He had access to unique technology and a team of experts that could find just about anything.

"So we have completely mapped the ocean floor, we know every object that's there, we know every object that could be a container holding her in the sea," he said.

A relentless search Schafer and his team say will stop, if they don't get more funding.

"And we all feel, I'm speaking from everybody on the team, that she's in one of the targets we have not looked at yet," Tim Trahan of Underwater Expeditions said. "We can't stop. I go to sleep at night thinking we've located it, we just need to get to it."

The search of the rest of those targets will stop this week. For more information on how you can help,

http://abclocal.go.com/ktrk/story?section=news/local&id=5988951


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #793 1/13/09
Post by: jen3560 on January 14, 2009, 09:05:12 AM
whoops!  looks like I fubarred the bolding in that last post.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #793 1/13/09
Post by: Fox on January 14, 2009, 09:15:53 AM
whoops!  looks like I fubarred the bolding in that last post.

Thanks for your post. I think we all understood what points you were making. I had to laugh...I dont think I have ever seen FUBAR in past tense...I like it!  ::MonkeyHaHa::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #793 1/13/09
Post by: jen3560 on January 14, 2009, 09:26:55 AM
whoops!  looks like I fubarred the bolding in that last post.

Thanks for your post. I think we all understood what points you were making. I had to laugh...I dont think I have ever seen FUBAR in past tense...I like it!  ::MonkeyHaHa::

LOL Fox.  I wasn't sure if that should be spelled with 2 r's or just one. ::MonkeyTongue::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #793 1/13/09
Post by: jen3560 on January 14, 2009, 09:59:29 AM
Another interesting issue of note here.  This from Silvetti's post at BFN:

The important thing is to raise funds. It will require corporate support as well as private donations. Dave and Beth have been doing a great job getting the word out and while I was on the island, Dave put me in contact with the head of the Hotel Association who is working on raising a sizeable amount.
-----------

RIGHT!

Because AHATA was oh so helpful in finding Natalee right from the beginning?  Would that be those same folks from the Tourism Industry who were "moved" to the Justice Dept to "help solve this case"?

The same people who set out within the first week to besmirch Natalee and state she was a run away?

I wonder just how that meeting between Silvetti and AHATA went?  And I wonder when, exactly, it took place?

Remember Jorge Pesquera - wasn't he the former President of AHATA - admitting to Beth that there was a cover up that had taken place.

I wonder just how far AHATA was willing to go to further that cover up?  I wonder if they would have gone as far as offering a boat Owner some incentives to look the other way if and when anything was found?


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #793 1/13/09
Post by: Edward on January 14, 2009, 10:30:39 AM
Morning Johan!

Edward...Two Luis Mansurs - The son and the brother. No three, another around Joran's age!

Sorry, no notes, again, but there is a lot of info on the internet on the Mansur family relationships. Will tell you whom is related to whom and how.

I did find the picture of the young one last night.. But without a doubt Luis Mansur is the brother of Jossy Mansur and he must have a son >jr
 The judge in the court case was very clear on who he is and what he has done in his past..
He is not a nice guy and people fear him. That is the kind of person you are looking for..


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #793 1/13/09
Post by: Tamikosmom on January 14, 2009, 10:31:29 AM
I hope everyone had a chance to hear this one over the Christmas season, I think it's a great message any time!

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1w1IwQZPOmM



     J4N    ::MonkeyCool::



texasmas ... thank you.

Janet


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #793 1/13/09
Post by: wingnut on January 14, 2009, 10:42:31 AM
Another interesting issue of note here.  This from Silvetti's post at BFN:

The important thing is to raise funds. It will require corporate support as well as private donations. Dave and Beth have been doing a great job getting the word out and while I was on the island, Dave put me in contact with the head of the Hotel Association who is working on raising a sizeable amount.
-----------

RIGHT!

Because AHATA was oh so helpful in finding Natalee right from the beginning?  Would that be those same folks from the Tourism Industry who were "moved" to the Justice Dept to "help solve this case"?

The same people who set out within the first week to besmirch Natalee and state she was a run away?

I wonder just how that meeting between Silvetti and AHATA went?  And I wonder when, exactly, it took place?

Remember Jorge Pesquera - wasn't he the former President of AHATA - admitting to Beth that there was a cover up that had taken place.

I wonder just how far AHATA was willing to go to further that cover up?  I wonder if they would have gone as far as offering a boat Owner some incentives to look the other way if and when anything was found?

So......how much did the head of the Hotel Association raise????  I wonder where those funds are now????  Class action lawsuits take $$$ to settle.........  Just sayin'.......



Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #793 1/13/09
Post by: Tamikosmom on January 14, 2009, 10:43:17 AM
Another interesting issue of note here.  This from Silvetti's post at BFN:

The important thing is to raise funds. It will require corporate support as well as private donations. Dave and Beth have been doing a great job getting the word out and while I was on the island, Dave put me in contact with the head of the Hotel Association who is working on raising a sizeable amount.
-----------

RIGHT!

Because AHATA was oh so helpful in finding Natalee right from the beginning?  Would that be those same folks from the Tourism Industry who were "moved" to the Justice Dept to "help solve this case"?

The same people who set out within the first week to besmirch Natalee and state she was a run away?

I wonder just how that meeting between Silvetti and AHATA went?  And I wonder when, exactly, it took place?

Remember Jorge Pesquera - wasn't he the former President of AHATA - admitting to Beth that there was a cover up that had taken place.

I wonder just how far AHATA was willing to go to further that cover up?  I wonder if they would have gone as far as offering a boat Owner some incentives to look the other way if and when anything was found?

  ::MonkeyShocked::

Thanks Jen.

Dave Holloway wrote a book called "Corruption in Paradise".  He is well aware that the "powers that be" in Aruba are behind the coverup that has prevented justice from prevailing for his daughter from the getgo ...

I do not get it!

Anyways ... if the Persistence endeavor benefited financially as a result of an AHATA contribution  ... it can ony be considered another John Silvetti conflict of interest that would further explain the happenings encompassing the recovery of the contents of the trap/cage which Kyle Kingman revealed in his own words.

 ::MonkeyNoNo::

Janet



Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #793 1/13/09
Post by: Tamikosmom on January 14, 2009, 10:51:04 AM
I contend that CAPS is deception personified.

Also ... logic dictates that in January, 2008 ... almost three years into the investigation ... somebody who is going to be revered as in the know should be aware of the role that Jug Twitty played in the life of Natalee Holloway.

It appears that Dave Holloway's friends (according to Robin) ... Reality and/or Mark Purcell (MIP6) ... may be directly involved or ... lurking somewhere behind the scenes pulling some strings.  Take note that CAPS addresses Julia Renfro ... a friend of Mark Purcell ... a friend that is thisclose.

IMO

Janet
______

JANUARY, 2008

CapsLockWizard
Re: Natalee Case Discussion #715 1/25 -
« Reply #384 on: January 27, 2008, 02:51:39 PM »


need to know 2 things

Did Natalee travel somewhere before he come to Aruba

and

and the parents tree   Natalee is the doughter of  -----  and --------- etc.

I know that probably Dave Holloway has notting to do with this Case but the Twitty

Wat is twitty to natalee?

http://scaredmonkeys.net/index.php?topic=2539.msg332978;topicseen#msg332978


APRIL 1, 2008

CapsLockWizard
Re: SHANGO/SIMIAN - who are they and what did they know? #2
« Reply #609 on: April 01, 2008, 03:15:49 AM »


my first question this morning around 9:30 was:

Why would beth lie about her being a virgin and who run with the story was fox news. where did they got the news from? I will answer Julia.

Why why would I lhype up something that was not true and now i need some one to run with it. that can colorabrorate and sustain my lie. My friend. who walk with me. both know it is not the true and that makes it like we say in Logic world,  NOT = NOT and that makes it a logic sense.

it can not be OR and can not be AND OR logic. do not compute.

http://scaredmonkeys.net/index.php?topic=2733.msg369749#msg369749


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #793 1/13/09
Post by: jen3560 on January 14, 2009, 10:51:33 AM
Another interesting issue of note here.  This from Silvetti's post at BFN:

The important thing is to raise funds. It will require corporate support as well as private donations. Dave and Beth have been doing a great job getting the word out and while I was on the island, Dave put me in contact with the head of the Hotel Association who is working on raising a sizeable amount.
-----------

RIGHT!

Because AHATA was oh so helpful in finding Natalee right from the beginning?  Would that be those same folks from the Tourism Industry who were "moved" to the Justice Dept to "help solve this case"?

The same people who set out within the first week to besmirch Natalee and state she was a run away?

I wonder just how that meeting between Silvetti and AHATA went?  And I wonder when, exactly, it took place?

Remember Jorge Pesquera - wasn't he the former President of AHATA - admitting to Beth that there was a cover up that had taken place.

I wonder just how far AHATA was willing to go to further that cover up?  I wonder if they would have gone as far as offering a boat Owner some incentives to look the other way if and when anything was found?

So......how much did the head of the Hotel Association raise????  I wonder where those funds are now????  Class action lawsuits take $$$ to settle.........  Just sayin'.......



And that would have been Rob Smith, right?  ::MonkeyWink::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #793 1/13/09
Post by: jen3560 on January 14, 2009, 10:53:16 AM
I contend that CAPS is deception personified.

Also ... logic dictates that in January, 2008 ... almost three years into the investigation ... somebody who is going to be revered as in the know should be aware of the role that Jug Twitty played in the life of Natalee Holloway.

It appears that Dave Holloway's friends (according to Robin) ... Reality and/or Mark Purcell (MIP6) ... may be directly involved or ... lurking somewhere behind the scenes pulling some strings.  Take note that CAPS addresses Julia Renfro ... a friend of Mark Purcell ... a friend that is thisclose.

IMO

Janet
______

JANUARY, 2008

CapsLockWizard
Re: Natalee Case Discussion #715 1/25 -
« Reply #384 on: January 27, 2008, 02:51:39 PM »


need to know 2 things

Did Natalee travel somewhere before he come to Aruba

and

and the parents tree   Natalee is the doughter of  -----  and --------- etc.

I know that probably Dave Holloway has notting to do with this Case but the Twitty

Wat is twitty to natalee?

http://scaredmonkeys.net/index.php?topic=2539.msg332978;topicseen#msg332978


APRIL 1, 2008

CapsLockWizard
Re: SHANGO/SIMIAN - who are they and what did they know? #2
« Reply #609 on: April 01, 2008, 03:15:49 AM »


my first question this morning around 9:30 was:

Why would beth lie about her being a virgin and who run with the story was fox news. where did they got the news from? I will answer Julia.

Why why would I lhype up something that was not true and now i need some one to run with it. that can colorabrorate and sustain my lie. My friend. who walk with me. both know it is not the true and that makes it like we say in Logic world,  NOT = NOT and that makes it a logic sense.

it can not be OR and can not be AND OR logic. do not compute.

http://scaredmonkeys.net/index.php?topic=2733.msg369749#msg369749

And wasn't Mark Purcell the former director of the Mariott?  Working with ROB SMITH?


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #793 1/13/09
Post by: Tamikosmom on January 14, 2009, 10:54:54 AM
I contend that CAPS is deception personified.

Also ... logic dictates that in January, 2008 ... almost three years into the investigation ... somebody who is going to be revered as in the know should be aware of the role that Jug Twitty played in the life of Natalee Holloway.

It appears that Dave Holloway's friends (according to Robin) ... Reality and/or Mark Purcell (MIP6) ... may be directly involved or ... lurking somewhere behind the scenes pulling some strings.  Take note that CAPS addresses Julia Renfro ... a friend of Mark Purcell ... a friend that is thisclose.

IMO

Janet
______

JANUARY, 2008

CapsLockWizard
Re: Natalee Case Discussion #715 1/25 -
« Reply #384 on: January 27, 2008, 02:51:39 PM »


need to know 2 things

Did Natalee travel somewhere before he come to Aruba

and

and the parents tree   Natalee is the doughter of  -----  and --------- etc.

I know that probably Dave Holloway has notting to do with this Case but the Twitty

Wat is twitty to natalee?

http://scaredmonkeys.net/index.php?topic=2539.msg332978;topicseen#msg332978


APRIL 1, 2008

CapsLockWizard
Re: SHANGO/SIMIAN - who are they and what did they know? #2
« Reply #609 on: April 01, 2008, 03:15:49 AM »


my first question this morning around 9:30 was:

Why would beth lie about her being a virgin and who run with the story was fox news. where did they got the news from? I will answer Julia.

Why why would I lhype up something that was not true and now i need some one to run with it. that can colorabrorate and sustain my lie. My friend. who walk with me. both know it is not the true and that makes it like we say in Logic world,  NOT = NOT and that makes it a logic sense.

it can not be OR and can not be AND OR logic. do not compute.

http://scaredmonkeys.net/index.php?topic=2733.msg369749#msg369749

And wasn't Mark Purcell the former director of the Mariott?  Working with ROB SMITH?

Why Dave?  Why?

Janet


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #793 1/13/09
Post by: Tamikosmom on January 14, 2009, 10:56:46 AM
GOOD MORNING MONKEYS!!  GOOD MORNING ZOOKEEPERS!!!

Life outside the computer room beckens this morning.

Later, Janet
8:00 AM PT


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #793 1/13/09
Post by: jen3560 on January 14, 2009, 10:59:08 AM
Here is just one example of what Dave's (via Robin Holloway) good pal Mark Purcell has to say about him.  Posted by Mark Purcell aka Doc Holladay aka MIP6 at RU:

Doc Holladay PostPosted: Sat Jun 24, 2006 7:43 am

Are the pages from Dave’s work of fiction soft when you wipe with them?
------------

Dave Holloway (hopefully unwittingly) to Mark Purcell, to Rob Smith

Dave Holloway to John Silvetti to Rob Smith

Capslockwizard...............Julia Renfro...............Mark Purcell............Rob Smith...........John Silvetti

Can someone say circle jerk?

Can someone say circle jerk?


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #793 1/13/09
Post by: billb's daughter on January 14, 2009, 11:06:14 AM
Kermit,
I know this may not be a popular view,
But do we know that kyle was not just making drama to promote a sale of his pics/rov video to the highest network bidder? As far as I have read, there is no evidence that clearly points to Natalee's (or anyone else) remains was in the cage.  Yes, I know there is probable cause to suspect something is amiss wrt the persistence search, but without due process of potential evidence recovered from the cage, there is no way to ascertain the contents of the cage.
I think what kyle did was despicable, and what persistence did by asking for contributions in the name of Justice for Natalee was/is despicable,  but without evidence, that is all we have, nothing more. Is it, or is it not Natalee? We can't know, based on the info provided to date.
Pursuing the human trafficking angle may be all we have at the moment, and I hope JQK can push it forward. Another angle may be whatever Peter DV's comes up with in his next segment.....greta, where are you?......
Bumped....If not Kermit, maybe a Freebird can comment? Thanks.....


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #793 1/13/09
Post by: Anna on January 14, 2009, 11:16:28 AM
Good Morning, Monkeys,

And we still have the tapes that TJ Ward gave to Greta about "the Colombians" that we have not yet heard.  I wonder if they implicate van der Straten as well.



Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #793 1/13/09
Post by: jen3560 on January 14, 2009, 11:24:25 AM
Kermit,
I know this may not be a popular view,
But do we know that kyle was not just making drama to promote a sale of his pics/rov video to the highest network bidder? As far as I have read, there is no evidence that clearly points to Natalee's (or anyone else) remains was in the cage.  Yes, I know there is probable cause to suspect something is amiss wrt the persistence search, but without due process of potential evidence recovered from the cage, there is no way to ascertain the contents of the cage.
I think what kyle did was despicable, and what persistence did by asking for contributions in the name of Justice for Natalee was/is despicable,  but without evidence, that is all we have, nothing more. Is it, or is it not Natalee? We can't know, based on the info provided to date.
Pursuing the human trafficking angle may be all we have at the moment, and I hope JQK can push it forward. Another angle may be whatever Peter DV's comes up with in his next segment.....greta, where are you?......
Bumped....If not Kermit, maybe a Freebird can comment? Thanks.....

The biggest reason I have for not believing this - Kyle was informed before he joined us that a member of Natalee's family was with us.  I don't think Kyle would have done something like that in those circumstances.

I do truly believe that Kyle found himself between a rock and a hard place - and wanted to do the right thing.

I think it was May or June that Kyle went to Louisiana to see Silvetti - and wound up finding himself in between a bigger rock and a hard place after that meeting.  Kyle came back from Louisiana and began dodging questions and essentially making himself scarce.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #793 1/13/09
Post by: Tamikosmom on January 14, 2009, 11:34:23 AM
Kermit,
I know this may not be a popular view,
But do we know that kyle was not just making drama to promote a sale of his pics/rov video to the highest network bidder? As far as I have read, there is no evidence that clearly points to Natalee's (or anyone else) remains was in the cage.  Yes, I know there is probable cause to suspect something is amiss wrt the persistence search, but without due process of potential evidence recovered from the cage, there is no way to ascertain the contents of the cage.
I think what kyle did was despicable, and what persistence did by asking for contributions in the name of Justice for Natalee was/is despicable,  but without evidence, that is all we have, nothing more. Is it, or is it not Natalee? We can't know, based on the info provided to date.
Pursuing the human trafficking angle may be all we have at the moment, and I hope JQK can push it forward. Another angle may be whatever Peter DV's comes up with in his next segment.....greta, where are you?......
Bumped....If not Kermit, maybe a Freebird can comment? Thanks.....

The biggest reason I have for not believing this - Kyle was informed before he joined us that a member of Natalee's family was with us.  I don't think Kyle would have done something like that in those circumstances.

I do truly believe that Kyle found himself between a rock and a hard place - and wanted to do the right thing.

I think it was May or June that Kyle went to Louisiana to see Silvetti - and wound up finding himself in between a bigger rock and a hard place after that meeting.  Kyle came back from Louisiana and began dodging questions and essentially making himself scarce.

KYLE KINGMAN - IN HIS OWN WORDS

Kyle
:  On the other hand, those differences has also caused a rift between Tim Trahan/Louis and myself with John (although John and I remain close friends and colleagues). The result is Tim, Louis and I are moving forward and John is left out of the loop.



Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #793 1/13/09
Post by: 2NJSons_Mom on January 14, 2009, 11:35:08 AM
I just went back and revisited the pictures on Silvetti's Company's site from the search for Natalee.  There are 3 photos of a cage that appears to be on the deck of the Persistence while docked....similar in shape/size to the one in the ROV pics.  This one clean looking and in one of the shots, Kyle and Tim T. are looking at it. 

I was not able to capture them to bring here, but they are about midway in that large group of pics. 

Was there talk of a cage facsimile that I do not recall that they used for comparison during the search? 

http://www.silvettigroup.com/Arubapix/index.html


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #793 1/13/09
Post by: jen3560 on January 14, 2009, 11:38:12 AM
2NJ - YES there was.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #793 1/13/09
Post by: jen3560 on January 14, 2009, 11:43:17 AM
Is there any way a smarter monkey than me could grab those pictures before they disappear?


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #793 1/13/09
Post by: 2NJSons_Mom on January 14, 2009, 11:43:36 AM
2NJ - YES there was.

OK, thanks, Jen.   :smt039


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #793 1/13/09
Post by: jen3560 on January 14, 2009, 11:47:10 AM
2NJ - YES there was.

OK, thanks, Jen.   :smt039

You're welcome!

There was a mock up done of a cage, and it was submerged - IIRC, that was to get a look at the reading that size and style of cage would register with their equipment, so they could recognize the real mccoy if/when they found it.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #793 1/13/09
Post by: 2NJSons_Mom on January 14, 2009, 11:47:38 AM
Is there any way a smarter monkey than me could grab those pictures before they disappear?

I'm sure there is....I had trouble when I tried.

KLAAS??


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #793 1/13/09
Post by: Anna on January 14, 2009, 11:50:19 AM
2NJ - YES there was.

OK, thanks, Jen.   :smt039

You're welcome!

There was a mock up done of a cage, and it was submerged - IIRC, that was to get a look at the reading that size and style of cage would register with their equipment, so they could recognize the real mccoy if/when they found it.



Yes, I recall there being a cage/trap obtained and used to show what the profile would be on the sonar, etc.

Screen capture might get those photos but I can't do it even after getting the software to do so.   ::MonkeyWaa::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #793 1/13/09
Post by: jen3560 on January 14, 2009, 12:00:45 PM


We had several interesting discussions both on deck and in the relatively small galley. At one point, the boat-owner, Capt. John Silvetti (of the J.D. Silvetti Group), expressed his frustration about the lack of an exact description of the missing "crab cage" in which Natalee was likely enclosed. He'd been requesting one for several weeks, and Louis had expressed the identical frustration to me earlier.

From the best reports he could obtain, Tim had determined an approximate cage size. The search team commissioned the construction of a model cage and planned to drop it underwater to obtain as accurate a scan signature as possible to enable quicker identification of the actual cage.

http://forensicthoughtprints.com/aruba/default.html


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #793 1/13/09
Post by: jen3560 on January 14, 2009, 12:04:00 PM
Is there any way a smarter monkey than me could grab those pictures before they disappear?

I'm sure there is....I had trouble when I tried.

KLAAS??

I'm absolutely terrible with pictures.  Thank you and Anna both for trying!!

Careful to whomever DOES capture them.  I don't see any copyrights, but be sure when re-producing here to credit the site they were taken from.

Don't want any more litigation threats.  ::MonkeyWink::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #793 1/13/09
Post by: nonesuche on January 14, 2009, 12:07:49 PM
Is there any way a smarter monkey than me could grab those pictures before they disappear?

Jen I could try later today but am hosting a demo for work right now with a global team so I can't take my attention from that long enough to do it, at least not until around 3pm today?

A great tool that is pretty inexpensive is Snag-It and you can get it at techsmith.com

2NJ please know my post last night wasn't directed at you, you haven't created stand-off's and dust-up's over CAPS but others have. 


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #793 1/13/09
Post by: Blonde on January 14, 2009, 12:08:34 PM
I contend that CAPS is deception personified.

Also ... logic dictates that in January, 2008 ... almost three years into the investigation ... somebody who is going to be revered as in the know should be aware of the role that Jug Twitty played in the life of Natalee Holloway.

It appears that Dave Holloway's friends (according to Robin) ... Reality and/or Mark Purcell (MIP6) ... may be directly involved or ... lurking somewhere behind the scenes pulling some strings.  Take note that CAPS addresses Julia Renfro ... a friend of Mark Purcell ... a friend that is thisclose.

IMO

Janet
______

JANUARY, 2008

CapsLockWizard
Re: Natalee Case Discussion #715 1/25 -
« Reply #384 on: January 27, 2008, 02:51:39 PM »


need to know 2 things

Did Natalee travel somewhere before he come to Aruba

and

and the parents tree   Natalee is the doughter of  -----  and --------- etc.

I know that probably Dave Holloway has notting to do with this Case but the Twitty

Wat is twitty to natalee?

http://scaredmonkeys.net/index.php?topic=2539.msg332978;topicseen#msg332978


APRIL 1, 2008

CapsLockWizard
Re: SHANGO/SIMIAN - who are they and what did they know? #2
« Reply #609 on: April 01, 2008, 03:15:49 AM »


my first question this morning around 9:30 was:

Why would beth lie about her being a virgin and who run with the story was fox news. where did they got the news from? I will answer Julia.

Why why would I lhype up something that was not true and now i need some one to run with it. that can colorabrorate and sustain my lie. My friend. who walk with me. both know it is not the true and that makes it like we say in Logic world,  NOT = NOT and that makes it a logic sense.

it can not be OR and can not be AND OR logic. do not compute.

http://scaredmonkeys.net/index.php?topic=2733.msg369749#msg369749

Thank You for finding this, did CAP's know anything at all about this case.
This is when I thought he was FOS.
I never read any of his posts because gezzz
I know that probably Dave Holloway has notting to do with this Case
but the Twitty


look at the way he talks I bet he's more then one poster. IMO


Wat is twitty to natalee?


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #793 1/13/09
Post by: jen3560 on January 14, 2009, 12:11:26 PM
Is there any way a smarter monkey than me could grab those pictures before they disappear?

Jen I could try later today but am hosting a demo for work right now with a global team so I can't take my attention from that long enough to do it, at least not until around 3pm today?

A great tool that is pretty inexpensive is Snag-It and you can get it at techsmith.com

2NJ please know my post last night wasn't directed at you, you haven't created stand-off's and dust-up's over CAPS but others have. 

Hiya none!

Thanks to anyone who can get them!!


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #793 1/13/09
Post by: Blonde on January 14, 2009, 12:15:51 PM
Morning Johan!

Edward...Two Luis Mansurs - The son and the brother. No three, another around Joran's age!

Sorry, no notes, again, but there is a lot of info on the internet on the Mansur family relationships. Will tell you whom is related to whom and how.

I did find the picture of the young one last night.. But without a doubt Luis Mansur is the brother of Jossy Mansur and he must have a son >jr
 The judge in the court case was very clear on who he is and what he has done in his past..
He is not a nice guy and people fear him. That is the kind of person you are looking for..
(http://i18.photobucket.com/albums/b104/Blondeonahd/persistence/JossyFamily.jpg)

A family picture


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #793 1/13/09
Post by: 2NJSons_Mom on January 14, 2009, 12:17:59 PM
Hi, None.....my comment last night was intended as humor....your sig line made me do it.   ::MonkeyHaHa::

To clarify....sig line then, not currently.   


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #793 1/13/09
Post by: Blonde on January 14, 2009, 12:21:12 PM
I contend that CAPS is deception personified.

Also ... logic dictates that in January, 2008 ... almost three years into the investigation ... somebody who is going to be revered as in the know should be aware of the role that Jug Twitty played in the life of Natalee Holloway.

It appears that Dave Holloway's friends (according to Robin) ... Reality and/or Mark Purcell (MIP6) ... may be directly involved or ... lurking somewhere behind the scenes pulling some strings.  Take note that CAPS addresses Julia Renfro ... a friend of Mark Purcell ... a friend that is thisclose.

IMO

Janet
______

JANUARY, 2008

CapsLockWizard
Re: Natalee Case Discussion #715 1/25 -
« Reply #384 on: January 27, 2008, 02:51:39 PM »


need to know 2 things

Did Natalee travel somewhere before he come to Aruba

and

and the parents tree   Natalee is the doughter of  -----  and --------- etc.

I know that probably Dave Holloway has notting to do with this Case but the Twitty

Wat is twitty to natalee?

http://scaredmonkeys.net/index.php?topic=2539.msg332978;topicseen#msg332978


APRIL 1, 2008

CapsLockWizard
Re: SHANGO/SIMIAN - who are they and what did they know? #2
« Reply #609 on: April 01, 2008, 03:15:49 AM »


my first question this morning around 9:30 was:

Why would beth lie about her being a virgin and who run with the story was fox news. where did they got the news from? I will answer Julia.

Why why would I lhype up something that was not true and now i need some one to run with it. that can colorabrorate and sustain my lie. My friend. who walk with me. both know it is not the true and that makes it like we say in Logic world,  NOT = NOT and that makes it a logic sense.

it can not be OR and can not be AND OR logic. do not compute.

http://scaredmonkeys.net/index.php?topic=2733.msg369749#msg369749

And wasn't Mark Purcell the former director of the Mariott?  Working with ROB SMITH?


Jen read here http://scaredmonkeys.net/index.php?topic=615.0


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #793 1/13/09
Post by: jen3560 on January 14, 2009, 12:24:49 PM
LOL Blonde!

I just couldn't remember his exact position with the Mariott.

I see you are catching up on the thread - could you try to get those cage pictures off of Silvetti's site?


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #793 1/13/09
Post by: Blonde on January 14, 2009, 12:28:21 PM
Here is just one example of what Dave's (via Robin Holloway) good pal Mark Purcell has to say about him.  Posted by Mark Purcell aka Doc Holladay aka MIP6 at RU:

Doc Holladay PostPosted: Sat Jun 24, 2006 7:43 am

Are the pages from Dave’s work of fiction soft when you wipe with them?
------------

Dave Holloway (hopefully unwittingly) to Mark Purcell, to Rob Smith

Dave Holloway to John Silvetti to Rob Smith

Capslockwizard...............Julia Renfro...............Mark Purcell............Rob Smith...........John Silvetti

Can someone say circle jerk?

Can someone say circle jerk?


I posted the same thing on that site a while back about Dave not sharing in the funds raised after someone else posted that Dave had set up a trust for his use and I wondered why the home page had that information on it as is was misleading, all the BHT followers blew it off as no big deal.
I felt it was/is a big deal as it leads one to believe that all the Twitty / Holloway efforts would benefit from your generous donation to the Amsouth trust. More spinning and deception.

10-20-2005, 03:01 PM
MIP6
New Member Join Date: Sep 2005
Posts: 16


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #793 1/13/09
Post by: Blonde on January 14, 2009, 12:30:01 PM
LOL Blonde!

I just couldn't remember his exact position with the Mariott.

I see you are catching up on the thread - could you try to get those cage pictures off of Silvetti's site?

Jen I made a whole thread on it here, http://scaredmonkeys.net/index.php?topic=4145.0


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #793 1/13/09
Post by: 2NJSons_Mom on January 14, 2009, 12:31:44 PM
I just captured 3 of those cage pics.  I'm just slow with skills that need brushing up a bit, and this computer is a clunker.  If Blonde or someone gets them here first, I'm used to that!   ::MonkeyWink::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #793 1/13/09
Post by: jen3560 on January 14, 2009, 12:38:26 PM
LOL Blonde!

I just couldn't remember his exact position with the Mariott.

I see you are catching up on the thread - could you try to get those cage pictures off of Silvetti's site?

Jen I made a whole thread on it here, http://scaredmonkeys.net/index.php?topic=4145.0

I don't see those particular pics on your thread though?

The ones of the cage sitting in the boat?


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #793 1/13/09
Post by: Anna on January 14, 2009, 12:43:23 PM
I think the test trap photos are interesting.  These are from Silvetti's site, not Kyle's blog, correct?

There are some in Blond's thread that are not on that site and some on that site we don't have copies of but would be hard to know which ones are missing.

Some of crew not seen before.  I wonder if that matters as maybe is a cook or something unrelated to any searches.



Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #793 1/13/09
Post by: crazybabyborg on January 14, 2009, 12:53:57 PM
Hi Monkeys!! Peeking in from work, but wanted to say hello and shout out to Blonde that I hope she's feeling better!!!


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #793 1/13/09
Post by: 2NJSons_Mom on January 14, 2009, 12:56:56 PM
http://www.silvettigroup.com/Arubapix/index.html

(http://i92.photobucket.com/albums/l5/2NJSons_Mom/Cage.jpg)

(http://i92.photobucket.com/albums/l5/2NJSons_Mom/cage1.jpg)

(http://i92.photobucket.com/albums/l5/2NJSons_Mom/Cage3.jpg)


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #793 1/13/09
Post by: jen3560 on January 14, 2009, 01:02:42 PM
Thanks 2NJ!  Great job!!


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #793 1/13/09
Post by: 2NJSons_Mom on January 14, 2009, 01:15:15 PM
I think the test trap photos are interesting.  These are from Silvetti's site, not Kyle's blog, correct?

There are some in Blond's thread that are not on that site and some on that site we don't have copies of but would be hard to know which ones are missing.

Some of crew not seen before.  I wonder if that matters as maybe is a cook or something unrelated to any searches.



Yes, they are from The Silvetti Group Site.  I had forgotten that Blonde posted some of these pics, and there are many so it would be cumbersome to copy all.

I, too, saw many different faces.  I was thinking that the crew may have changed a couple of times, depending on their jobs, as you've mentioned. 


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #793 1/13/09
Post by: klaasend on January 14, 2009, 01:15:28 PM
I just went back and revisited the pictures on Silvetti's Company's site from the search for Natalee.  There are 3 photos of a cage that appears to be on the deck of the Persistence while docked....similar in shape/size to the one in the ROV pics.  This one clean looking and in one of the shots, Kyle and Tim T. are looking at it. 

I was not able to capture them to bring here, but they are about midway in that large group of pics. 

Was there talk of a cage facsimile that I do not recall that they used for comparison during the search? 

http://www.silvettigroup.com/Arubapix/index.html

(http://i118.photobucket.com/albums/o100/klaasen3/Sub5/perstrap3.jpg)

KYLE

(http://i118.photobucket.com/albums/o100/klaasen3/Sub5/perstrap2.jpg)

(http://i118.photobucket.com/albums/o100/klaasen3/Sub5/perstrap1.jpg)


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #793 1/13/09
Post by: 2NJSons_Mom on January 14, 2009, 01:17:32 PM
Thanks 2NJ!  Great job!!

They need to be resized.  I don't want to make them too big. 

I'll be back in a bit....have to feed the dog and let her out. 


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #793 1/13/09
Post by: Kermit on January 14, 2009, 01:17:59 PM
(http://img413.imageshack.us/img413/5161/kylekingmanaboardrvpersdj7.png[img][img]http://img232.imageshack.us/img232/9366/johnsilvetti2nm3.jpg)
Photos from: http://www.silvettigroup.com/Arubapix


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #793 1/13/09
Post by: 2NJSons_Mom on January 14, 2009, 01:18:39 PM
 ::MonkeyHaHa::  Thanks, Klaas.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #793 1/13/09
Post by: Kermit on January 14, 2009, 01:19:10 PM
(http://img413.imageshack.us/img413/5161/kylekingmanaboardrvpersdj7.png)


(http://img232.imageshack.us/img232/9366/johnsilvetti2nm3.jpg)
Photos from: http://www.silvettigroup.com/Arubapix


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #793 1/13/09
Post by: jen3560 on January 14, 2009, 01:24:35 PM
Thanks everyone!

So if that cage was fashioned after the one from the huts - that would make it, what? 5' 1/2 x 4' x 17"?

And the one found was approx 7' x ? x 24"

3/8 rebar wrapped in chicken wire.

Who was it was telling us it would take a hoist to pick up the cage found?  ::MonkeyRoll::

I don't think so!

 


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #793 1/13/09
Post by: Kermit on January 14, 2009, 01:25:50 PM
I contend that CAPS is deception personified.

Also ... logic dictates that in January, 2008 ... almost three years into the investigation ... somebody who is going to be revered as in the know should be aware of the role that Jug Twitty played in the life of Natalee Holloway.

It appears that Dave Holloway's friends (according to Robin) ... Reality and/or Mark Purcell (MIP6) ... may be directly involved or ... lurking somewhere behind the scenes pulling some strings.  Take note that CAPS addresses Julia Renfro ... a friend of Mark Purcell ... a friend that is thisclose.

IMO

Janet
______

JANUARY, 2008

CapsLockWizard
Re: Natalee Case Discussion #715 1/25 -
« Reply #384 on: January 27, 2008, 02:51:39 PM »


need to know 2 things

Did Natalee travel somewhere before he come to Aruba

and

and the parents tree   Natalee is the doughter of  -----  and --------- etc.

I know that probably Dave Holloway has notting to do with this Case but the Twitty

Wat is twitty to natalee?

http://scaredmonkeys.net/index.php?topic=2539.msg332978;topicseen#msg332978


APRIL 1, 2008

CapsLockWizard
Re: SHANGO/SIMIAN - who are they and what did they know? #2
« Reply #609 on: April 01, 2008, 03:15:49 AM »


my first question this morning around 9:30 was:

Why would beth lie about her being a virgin and who run with the story was fox news. where did they got the news from? I will answer Julia.

Why why would I lhype up something that was not true and now i need some one to run with it. that can colorabrorate and sustain my lie. My friend. who walk with me. both know it is not the true and that makes it like we say in Logic world,  NOT = NOT and that makes it a logic sense.

it can not be OR and can not be AND OR logic. do not compute.

http://scaredmonkeys.net/index.php?topic=2733.msg369749#msg369749

And wasn't Mark Purcell the former director of the Mariott?  Working with ROB SMITH?


General Manager of Aruba Marriott Resort & Casino Richard Zeolla.

Richard Zeolla was the General Manager at Bucharest before coming to Aruba:

says Mark Purcell, the hotel's director of facilities.
http://www.findarticles.com/p/articles/mi_m0NAH/is_6_34/ai_n6181246/pg_4

MIP6 = Mark Purcell
I have been posting over at the Kool-Aid campsite for about month now <snip>
I had this Ringo character spinning after I went to the so-called Lions Den; I had been to this bar before and posted up what I found, nothing!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!


* Richard Zeoller is also on the AHATA board as treasurer

* Mark Purcell's wife, Marlene Purcell along with Antonio Carlos are involved in the AHATAboard as well.


Rob Smith was the General Manager of the  Wyndham Aruba Hotel & Casablanca Casino is the chairman of the AH&SF board






Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #793 1/13/09
Post by: Edward on January 14, 2009, 01:32:18 PM
The test trap is no where near the actual size of the trap that was actually found.
jmho

Blonde.. That family photo does not include a picture of Luis in it that I can see.
I have a picture of Luis here I will find it and post it.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #793 1/13/09
Post by: jen3560 on January 14, 2009, 01:41:19 PM
The test trap is no where near the actual size of the trap that was actually found.
jmho

Blonde.. That family photo does not include a picture of Luis in it that I can see.
I have a picture of Luis here I will find it and post it.


I would beg to differ - it is approx 2 feet smaller than the one found.  According to Kyle's estimation of measurements on the cage found.



Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #793 1/13/09
Post by: Keepthefaith on January 14, 2009, 01:41:33 PM
Do we have it confirmed whether Eduardo was present on the Jan 7th Dive?Would it be necessary for Eduardo to be on the boat in order to be in charge?Repetitive questions i know but, just can't quite grasp why the Mansur's have been at every turn in this case?


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #793 1/13/09
Post by: jen3560 on January 14, 2009, 01:43:11 PM
The test trap is no where near the actual size of the trap that was actually found.
jmho

Blonde.. That family photo does not include a picture of Luis in it that I can see.
I have a picture of Luis here I will find it and post it.


I would beg to differ - it is approx 2 feet smaller than the one found.  According to Kyle's estimation of measurements on the cage found.



ETA:  And that is IF the cage on the prior page was in fact fashioned with the measurements of approx 5'1/2 x 4' x 17".

And IF the measurements above were correct to begin with.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #793 1/13/09
Post by: jen3560 on January 14, 2009, 01:50:57 PM
Here is more from Hodges about the missing trap, and what they used to make their mock up:

http://forensicthoughtprints.com/aruba/default.html

The Cage
The fisherman also noticed that a large fishing cage stored behind the first of the three Fisherman's Huts at the southern-most corner was missing. The cage had been there approximately a month since about Good Friday, March 25, 2005. The cage belonged to another fisherman who kept his boat next to these four huts. The boat was still there. But the cage was missing.

The fisherman described the cage as made of 3/8-inch iron (such as that used in concrete reinforcing—"rebar") with a frame size approximately 5 ½ feet by 4 feet by 17 inches. He described it as a large fishing cage with its frame wrapped in chicken wire with its familiar hexagonal openings but with an opening in one panel which allowed them to trap fish. He believed that, given its size and weight, it would take two men to manage the cage. Once aboard, it would lay low on the floor of the nearby fishing boat.

 



Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #793 1/13/09
Post by: Edward on January 14, 2009, 01:59:57 PM
The test trap is no where near the actual size of the trap that was actually found.
jmho

Blonde.. That family photo does not include a picture of Luis in it that I can see.
I have a picture of Luis here I will find it and post it.


I would beg to differ - it is approx 2 feet smaller than the one found.  According to Kyle's estimation of measurements on the cage found.



I am just looking at the divers around the trap found and they are small compared to the trap..
But what ever works for ya. ::MonkeyWink::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #793 1/13/09
Post by: Kermit on January 14, 2009, 02:00:22 PM
The trap was symmetrical in width and length at approximately 7.5 ft. It was approximately 2.25-2.5 ft high.  
http://scaredmonkeys.net/index.php?topic=2668.msg360072#msg360072

Kyle said: "I think rocks in the cage are very unusual and indicate amateurs in opposed to fishermen disposed of the cage.


(http://img88.imageshack.us/img88/7130/fishcageinboatey4.jpg)


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #793 1/13/09
Post by: johan555 on January 14, 2009, 02:07:29 PM
Here is more from Hodges about the missing trap, and what they used to make their mock up:

http://forensicthoughtprints.com/aruba/default.html

The Cage
The fisherman also noticed that a large fishing cage stored behind the first of the three Fisherman's Huts at the southern-most corner was missing. The cage had been there approximately a month since about Good Friday, March 25, 2005. The cage belonged to another fisherman who kept his boat next to these four huts. The boat was still there. But the cage was missing.

The fisherman described the cage as made of 3/8-inch iron (such as that used in concrete reinforcing—"rebar") with a frame size approximately 5 ½ feet by 4 feet by 17 inches. He described it as a large fishing cage with its frame wrapped in chicken wire with its familiar hexagonal openings but with an opening in one panel which allowed them to trap fish. He believed that, given its size and weight, it would take two men to manage the cage. Once aboard, it would lay low on the floor of the nearby fishing boat.

 



there was no cage missing
H.Mos told that in his last press conference.
the cage was at the FM's house


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #793 1/13/09
Post by: wreck on January 14, 2009, 02:10:39 PM
Here is more from Hodges about the missing trap, and what they used to make their mock up:

http://forensicthoughtprints.com/aruba/default.html

The Cage
The fisherman also noticed that a large fishing cage stored behind the first of the three Fisherman's Huts at the southern-most corner was missing. The cage had been there approximately a month since about Good Friday, March 25, 2005. The cage belonged to another fisherman who kept his boat next to these four huts. The boat was still there. But the cage was missing.

The fisherman described the cage as made of 3/8-inch iron (such as that used in concrete reinforcing—"rebar") with a frame size approximately 5 ½ feet by 4 feet by 17 inches. He described it as a large fishing cage with its frame wrapped in chicken wire with its familiar hexagonal openings but with an opening in one panel which allowed them to trap fish. He believed that, given its size and weight, it would take two men to manage the cage. Once aboard, it would lay low on the floor of the nearby fishing boat.

 



there was no cage missing
H.Mos told that in his last press conference.
the cage was at the FM's house
....and you believe Mos because.............................?


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #793 1/13/09
Post by: johan555 on January 14, 2009, 02:10:49 PM
The trap was symmetrical in width and length at approximately 7.5 ft. It was approximately 2.25-2.5 ft high.  
http://scaredmonkeys.net/index.php?topic=2668.msg360072#msg360072

Kyle said: "I think rocks in the cage are very unusual and indicate amateurs in opposed to fishermen disposed of the cage.


(http://img88.imageshack.us/img88/7130/fishcageinboatey4.jpg)


They always put stones in a cage-to let him sink > better


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #793 1/13/09
Post by: sharon on January 14, 2009, 02:11:14 PM
I think Greta has a quote

HANS MOS LIES

I'll have to find the source  ::MonkeyWink::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #793 1/13/09
Post by: jen3560 on January 14, 2009, 02:13:19 PM
The test trap is no where near the actual size of the trap that was actually found.
jmho

Blonde.. That family photo does not include a picture of Luis in it that I can see.
I have a picture of Luis here I will find it and post it.


I would beg to differ - it is approx 2 feet smaller than the one found.  According to Kyle's estimation of measurements on the cage found.



I am just looking at the divers around the trap found and they are small compared to the trap..
But what ever works for ya. ::MonkeyWink::

I beleive there's a post somewhere from Kyle to PI explaining the distortion from the camera lens.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #793 1/13/09
Post by: johan555 on January 14, 2009, 02:13:37 PM
Here is more from Hodges about the missing trap, and what they used to make their mock up:

http://forensicthoughtprints.com/aruba/default.html

The Cage
The fisherman also noticed that a large fishing cage stored behind the first of the three Fisherman's Huts at the southern-most corner was missing. The cage had been there approximately a month since about Good Friday, March 25, 2005. The cage belonged to another fisherman who kept his boat next to these four huts. The boat was still there. But the cage was missing.

The fisherman described the cage as made of 3/8-inch iron (such as that used in concrete reinforcing—"rebar") with a frame size approximately 5 ½ feet by 4 feet by 17 inches. He described it as a large fishing cage with its frame wrapped in chicken wire with its familiar hexagonal openings but with an opening in one panel which allowed them to trap fish. He believed that, given its size and weight, it would take two men to manage the cage. Once aboard, it would lay low on the floor of the nearby fishing boat.

 



there was no cage missing
H.Mos told that in his last press conference.
the cage was at the FM's house
....and you believe Mos because.............................?

The fm told tim also this  : the cage belongs  to "another" fisherman
Mos told the same story and that they coudn't find that FM


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #793 1/13/09
Post by: jen3560 on January 14, 2009, 02:16:41 PM
Thamks Kerm!!

So the cage found - according to Kyle's estimations, versus the cage missing based on the fisherman's info - there is about a 2' difference in length, and a 3.5 ft differnce in width - with about 9" difference in height.

Looking at that cage on deck of the Persistence helps me put things in much better perspective.

Especially with that boat you posted.  Fairly small boat for a cage 5 1/2 x 4, so a bit larger of a cage wouldn't have a problem say - fitting onto the Gottenbos much bigger boat, IMO.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #793 1/13/09
Post by: 2NJSons_Mom on January 14, 2009, 02:17:32 PM
The trap was symmetrical in width and length at approximately 7.5 ft. It was approximately 2.25-2.5 ft high.  
http://scaredmonkeys.net/index.php?topic=2668.msg360072#msg360072

Kyle said: "I think rocks in the cage are very unusual and indicate amateurs in opposed to fishermen disposed of the cage.


(http://img88.imageshack.us/img88/7130/fishcageinboatey4.jpg)


They always put stones in a cage-to let him sink > better


I used to crab off a dock on Barnegat Bay here in NJ.  The traps were approx. 12"X12"X12 with chains or ropes from the corners that held the sides up until the trap was lowered into the water.  The only thing we put in the trap was bait.   These small traps, as well as the large ones are heavier than water, and dont need stones to sink them, imo. 

On the other hand, fishing line is light, thus weights are used to get the bait/hook into deeper water. 



Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #793 1/13/09
Post by: jen3560 on January 14, 2009, 02:18:21 PM
Here is more from Hodges about the missing trap, and what they used to make their mock up:

http://forensicthoughtprints.com/aruba/default.html

The Cage
The fisherman also noticed that a large fishing cage stored behind the first of the three Fisherman's Huts at the southern-most corner was missing. The cage had been there approximately a month since about Good Friday, March 25, 2005. The cage belonged to another fisherman who kept his boat next to these four huts. The boat was still there. But the cage was missing.

The fisherman described the cage as made of 3/8-inch iron (such as that used in concrete reinforcing—"rebar") with a frame size approximately 5 ½ feet by 4 feet by 17 inches. He described it as a large fishing cage with its frame wrapped in chicken wire with its familiar hexagonal openings but with an opening in one panel which allowed them to trap fish. He believed that, given its size and weight, it would take two men to manage the cage. Once aboard, it would lay low on the floor of the nearby fishing boat.

 



there was no cage missing
H.Mos told that in his last press conference.
the cage was at the FM's house
....and you believe Mos because.............................?

The fm told tim also this  : the cage belongs  to "another" fisherman
Mos told the same story and that they coudn't find that FM

Actually, I believe Mos said that they finally spoke with THE fisherman (over 3 years later) who by that time was saying he had taken his cage home - that it was never missing.

So - I guess it all depends on who a person believes.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #793 1/13/09
Post by: Keepthefaith on January 14, 2009, 02:20:36 PM
Here is more from Hodges about the missing trap, and what they used to make their mock up:

http://forensicthoughtprints.com/aruba/default.html

The Cage
The fisherman also noticed that a large fishing cage stored behind the first of the three Fisherman's Huts at the southern-most corner was missing. The cage had been there approximately a month since about Good Friday, March 25, 2005. The cage belonged to another fisherman who kept his boat next to these four huts. The boat was still there. But the cage was missing.

The fisherman described the cage as made of 3/8-inch iron (such as that used in concrete reinforcing—"rebar") with a frame size approximately 5 ½ feet by 4 feet by 17 inches. He described it as a large fishing cage with its frame wrapped in chicken wire with its familiar hexagonal openings but with an opening in one panel which allowed them to trap fish. He believed that, given its size and weight, it would take two men to manage the cage. Once aboard, it would lay low on the floor of the nearby fishing boat.

 



there was no cage missing
H.Mos told that in his last press conference.
the cage was at the FM's house
....and you believe Mos because.............................?

The fm told tim also this  : the cage belongs  to "another" fisherman
Mos told the same story and that they coudn't find that FM

Actually, I believe Mos said that they finally spoke with THE fisherman (over 3 years later) who by that time was saying he had taken his cage home - that it was never missing.

So - I guess it all depends on who a person believes.

Kermit,Mos,or the fisherman 3 years later?I stand with the FROG... ::MonkeyDance::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #793 1/13/09
Post by: texasmom on January 14, 2009, 02:32:04 PM
Hi monkeys!

About the location of the trap that was found.  Would someone post a link or other info where it is stated that it was located close to a frequently dove on shipwreck.  I've seen the picture here:

http://nholloway.blogspot.com/search?updated-max=2007-12-07T09%3A03%3A00-05%3A00&max-results=7

but from what it states under that and the date of the post, I don't believe this is the actual location of the trap that was found.  This is the quote from below that picture.

http://nholloway.blogspot.com/search?updated-max=2007-12-07T09%3A03%3A00-05%3A00&max-results=7

Quote
The above image is a sample side scan sonar image to illustrate the type of imaging and resolution a high quality digital side scan sonar is capable of acquiring. A wreck (~150ft long 3-masted schooner) is laying upright on the seabed. The dark area to the left of the wreck is the acoustic shadow. A crab trap similar in size and character to the one we will be searching for thought to contain the remains is seen near the bow of the wreck, shown by the black arrow.

Any help with this is appreciated!

Back to work!   ::MonkeyCool::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #793 1/13/09
Post by: 2NJSons_Mom on January 14, 2009, 02:33:57 PM
The trap was symmetrical in width and length at approximately 7.5 ft. It was approximately 2.25-2.5 ft high.  
http://scaredmonkeys.net/index.php?topic=2668.msg360072#msg360072

Kyle said: "I think rocks in the cage are very unusual and indicate amateurs in opposed to fishermen disposed of the cage.


(http://img88.imageshack.us/img88/7130/fishcageinboatey4.jpg)


They always put stones in a cage-to let him sink > better


I used to crab off a dock on Barnegat Bay here in NJ.  The traps were approx. 12"X12"X12 with chains or ropes from the corners that held the sides up until the trap was lowered into the water.  The only thing we put in the trap was bait.   These small traps, as well as the large ones are heavier than water, and dont need stones to sink them, imo. 

On the other hand, fishing line is light, thus weights are used to get the bait/hook into deeper water. 



No stones needed to sink this.

(http://www.alltackle.com/Crab-TrapwFLT.jpg)


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #793 1/13/09
Post by: 2NJSons_Mom on January 14, 2009, 02:35:38 PM
Yikes, sorry about that.    ::MonkeyEek::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #793 1/13/09
Post by: jen3560 on January 14, 2009, 02:44:30 PM
Hi monkeys!

About the location of the trap that was found.  Would someone post a link or other info where it is stated that it was located close to a frequently dove on shipwreck.  I've seen the picture here:

http://nholloway.blogspot.com/search?updated-max=2007-12-07T09%3A03%3A00-05%3A00&max-results=7

but from what it states under that and the date of the post, I don't believe this is the actual location of the trap that was found.  This is the quote from below that picture.

http://nholloway.blogspot.com/search?updated-max=2007-12-07T09%3A03%3A00-05%3A00&max-results=7

Quote
The above image is a sample side scan sonar image to illustrate the type of imaging and resolution a high quality digital side scan sonar is capable of acquiring. A wreck (~150ft long 3-masted schooner) is laying upright on the seabed. The dark area to the left of the wreck is the acoustic shadow. A crab trap similar in size and character to the one we will be searching for thought to contain the remains is seen near the bow of the wreck, shown by the black arrow.

Any help with this is appreciated!

Back to work!   ::MonkeyCool::

Thank you texasmom - I would also be very interested in seeing this, as no one knows the exact location of where this cage was found (except Persistence crew, and Caps, if you believe he dove on it as he said)- so I'm curious as to who posted that to begin with?


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #793 1/13/09
Post by: johan555 on January 14, 2009, 02:50:12 PM
The Antilla is located on the west coast not far from  Malmok Beach
And there was that cage also (in the same area )

(http://laughingeagle.com/cruise/2005_04_26/aruba_map_big.jpg)


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #793 1/13/09
Post by: Edward on January 14, 2009, 02:51:17 PM
From my understanding the stone can be used inside of a bait bag.
This bag "Denim"? is filled with fish to attrack crabs.. The rock holds the bait bag on the bottom.



Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #793 1/13/09
Post by: jen3560 on January 14, 2009, 02:57:38 PM
The Antilla is located on the west coast not far from  Malmok Beach
And there was that cage also (in the same area )

(http://laughingeagle.com/cruise/2005_04_26/aruba_map_big.jpg)

Thanks Johan - so there are plenty of nautical miles between Malmok and say the beginnings of the high rise hotels then.

Lots of distance there.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #793 1/13/09
Post by: johan555 on January 14, 2009, 03:12:57 PM
yes but there was also a Gottenbos (speed)boat not far from the FM huts

(http://i252.photobucket.com/albums/hh25/johan555/FIMAnSHUTSHOTkopie.jpg?t=1231963846)


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #793 1/13/09
Post by: sharon on January 14, 2009, 03:19:02 PM
From my understanding the stone can be used inside of a bait bag.
This bag "Denim"? is filled with fish to attrack crabs.. The rock holds the bait bag on the bottom.



Interesting, Edward.

Where do they do it that way?

I've gone crabbing in Maryland and in NJ and have never seen that before.

I've never seen that done in lobster traps in South Florida either.

I'd like to learn more.
.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #793 1/13/09
Post by: klaasend on January 14, 2009, 03:22:31 PM
From my understanding the stone can be used inside of a bait bag.
This bag "Denim"? is filled with fish to attrack crabs.. The rock holds the bait bag on the bottom.



Interesting, Edward.

Where do they do it that way?

I've gone crabbing in Maryland and in NJ and have never seen that before.

I've never seen that done in lobster traps in South Florida either.

I'd like to learn more.
.

http://www.neptunemarineproducts.com/baitbags.html

This one is mesh which makes more sense to me than denim  ::MonkeyWink::

(http://www.neptunemarineproducts.com/pics/bait-bag/baitbag.jpg)

Here's another that as least closer to denim

http://store.vernondeon.com/index.php?opt=detail&ID=76&PID=5692

(http://store.vernondeon.com/images/lg/ba115.jpg)


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #793 1/13/09
Post by: johan555 on January 14, 2009, 03:27:48 PM
i think this is a crab cage

(http://www.neptunemarineproducts.com/pics/fishermen1.jpg)


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #793 1/13/09
Post by: jen3560 on January 14, 2009, 03:28:29 PM
The Antilla is located on the west coast not far from  Malmok Beach
And there was that cage also (in the same area )



I don't think this is anywhere near where the cage and remains were found.

picture - next to last row from bottom

DSC01316 - The above-water portion of the Antilla  - a great Pelican perch
http://www.pbase.com/icicle50/aruba

the shallow waters a few hundred yards off the coast  of Aruba, the wreckage of the German freighter Antilla can be found. ...
www.coldwarhistory.us/Exhibitions/History/Antilla_in_Aruba/body_antilla_ in_aruba.html  post #2   

arubalisaPlease do not try to swim the .40 mile to the Antilla  snorkel for "x" amount of time and then swim back to shore against the wind and current.

The last person who I heard who attempted this was rescued via dinghy by a member of the Jolly Pirates crew who luckily for the snorkeler, happened to be nearby.snipped

http://www.aruba.com/forum/f10/snorkeling-antilla-32925/
------------------

I do believe that the cage was found further than .4 of a mile offshore.  And in none of the video footage can there be seen this "above water" portion of the wreckage.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #793 1/13/09
Post by: jen3560 on January 14, 2009, 03:30:43 PM
yes but there was also a Gottenbos (speed)boat not far from the FM huts



Right!  It was docked right there next to the Mariott!


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #793 1/13/09
Post by: johan555 on January 14, 2009, 03:36:46 PM
and this is the cage and wreck area ......... and the area of the "Gottenbos" house !!

(http://i252.photobucket.com/albums/hh25/johan555/gottcopy.jpg?t=1231964085)


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #793 1/13/09
Post by: sharon on January 14, 2009, 03:37:53 PM
Thanks klaas!

I've seen the mesh bags (not denim) -- I've never used them (or seen them) for trapping crab or lobster.

And for deep sea -- we just use that wierd fishing pole with a dozen hooks and catch us some 'bait' fish first before we go into deep water.  ::MonkeyWink::



Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #793 1/13/09
Post by: 2NJSons_Mom on January 14, 2009, 03:41:15 PM
From my understanding the stone can be used inside of a bait bag.
This bag "Denim"? is filled with fish to attrack crabs.. The rock holds the bait bag on the bottom.



Interesting, Edward.

Where do they do it that way?

I've gone crabbing in Maryland and in NJ and have never seen that before.

I've never seen that done in lobster traps in South Florida either.

I'd like to learn more.
.

The bait was always fastened to the middle of the trap with a clip or tied somehow when we 've gone.  It seems the bags are used in bait pots within certain traps (a cylindrical 'trap within a trap'). 

 :2waver: :fish:



Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #793 1/13/09
Post by: jen3560 on January 14, 2009, 03:41:55 PM
Thanks klaas!

I've seen the mesh bags (not denim) -- I've never used them (or seen them) for trapping crab or lobster.

And for deep sea -- we just use that wierd fishing pole with a dozen hooks and catch us some 'bait' fish first before we go into deep water.  ::MonkeyWink::



 ::MonkeyHaHa::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #793 1/13/09
Post by: jen3560 on January 14, 2009, 03:44:29 PM
johan,

here's a trick to finding out where (approximately) the cage was found.

Find OE's post about when he's standing on the beach watching the coast guard ship.

Take note of where he's standing, which direction he's looking, and how he states that coast guard ship was relative to the trap.

And then look at the video from Dateline, to see approximately how far out they were from shore.

(btw, it was nowhere near the Antilla or Malmok, and further out than the .40 miles the Antilla is  ::MonkeyWink::)


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #793 1/13/09
Post by: Edward on January 14, 2009, 03:46:10 PM
Well I was suggesting "denim" could be used.. notice the question mark.. ::MonkeyWink::

I think a person needs to think like a POOR Colombian fisherman and NOT a spoiled Rich American sport fisherman.. 
A old pair of blue jeans and you cut off the leg and tie both ends.. makes a nice bag that crabs cant rip up to easy..

Well anyways that is just my thoughts on it..  ::MonkeyRoll::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #793 1/13/09
Post by: bleachedblack on January 14, 2009, 03:46:15 PM
I believe this boat is in the location of where the trap was found. This pic was taken from shore Palm Beach right near Fishermans Huts 12/08.

(http://i118.photobucket.com/albums/o100/klaasen3/Sub5/boattrap.jpg)


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #793 1/13/09
Post by: bleachedblack on January 14, 2009, 03:48:22 PM
Sorry if pic doesn't come out right, I am not so good at posting.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #793 1/13/09
Post by: 2NJSons_Mom on January 14, 2009, 03:50:13 PM
Sorry if pic doesn't come out right, I am not so good at posting.

I got a 'forbidden' notice...and tried to fix it, but that didn't work...I tried IMG tags....?


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #793 1/13/09
Post by: klaasend on January 14, 2009, 03:50:52 PM
i think this is a crab cage

(http://www.neptunemarineproducts.com/pics/fishermen1.jpg)

Hundreds of different styles

(http://tbn2.google.com/images?q=tbn:uK5-VQR6qPRrdM:http://www.beachstuf.com/images/crabCage_02.gif)
(http://tbn1.google.com/images?q=tbn:8c0lwwO0Plzo5M:http://www.chinanetting.com/UploadProductPic/2007131131940682.jpg)

(http://tbn0.google.com/images?q=tbn:3dYg0J73ilXotM:http://farm1.static.flickr.com/204/511639792_a6b242f501.jpg%3Fv%3D0)

(http://tbn3.google.com/images?q=tbn:soNLNajTU8YDsM:http://lh6.ggpht.com/_gymqMmub-wg/RzRlPkLrV2I/AAAAAAAAAWE/oHDtyEHOxmk/IMG_1479.JPG)

(http://www.istockphoto.com/file_thumbview_approve/1938459/2/istockphoto_1938459_lobster_crab_cages.jpg)

http://travel.webshots.com/photo/2327223050059714458iaspwu

(http://i118.photobucket.com/albums/o100/klaasen3/Sub5/crabcage.jpg)


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #793 1/13/09
Post by: jen3560 on January 14, 2009, 03:51:56 PM
Well I was suggesting "denim" could be used.. notice the question mark.. ::MonkeyWink::

I think a person needs to think like a POOR Colombian fisherman and NOT a spoiled Rich American sport fisherman.. 
A old pair of blue jeans and you cut off the leg and tie both ends.. makes a nice bag that crabs cant rip up to easy..

Well anyways that is just my thoughts on it..  ::MonkeyRoll::

I would have to guess that a Colombian fisherman couldn't possibly be that poor as to not be able to afford proper bait bags - considering the cost of steel for that trap and the rigging attached to it.

Especially considering the cost of those bags, versus the cost of constantly having to replace your pants because you've cut them all up.

But that's just my guess.

From the link klaas provided (thanks klaas!)

BA115 Regular $1.45 EA
 
BA117 Large $1.75 EA
 


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #793 1/13/09
Post by: Edward on January 14, 2009, 03:54:42 PM
Obviously you have never met POOR before..
 ::MonkeyWink::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #793 1/13/09
Post by: johan555 on January 14, 2009, 03:55:05 PM
johan,

here's a trick to finding out where (approximately) the cage was found.

Find OE's post about when he's standing on the beach watching the coast guard ship.

Take note of where he's standing, which direction he's looking, and how he states that coast guard ship was relative to the trap.

And then look at the video from Dateline, to see approximately how far out they were from shore.

(btw, it was nowhere near the Antilla or Malmok, and further out than the .40 miles the Antilla is  ::MonkeyWink::)

oh there it was !!! ::MonkeyHaHa::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #793 1/13/09
Post by: klaasend on January 14, 2009, 03:55:15 PM
Well I was suggesting "denim" could be used.. notice the question mark.. ::MonkeyWink::

I think a person needs to think like a POOR Colombian fisherman and NOT a spoiled Rich American sport fisherman.. 
A old pair of blue jeans and you cut off the leg and tie both ends.. makes a nice bag that crabs cant rip up to easy..

Well anyways that is just my thoughts on it..  ::MonkeyRoll::

Edward - you are right, a poor fisherman might use anything including denim to make a bag.  Honestly, denim would probably be my last choice but if that's all ya got.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #793 1/13/09
Post by: Tamikosmom on January 14, 2009, 03:58:58 PM
From my understanding the stone can be used inside of a bait bag.
This bag "Denim"? is filled with fish to attrack crabs.. The rock holds the bait bag on the bottom.



Interesting, Edward.

Where do they do it that way?

I've gone crabbing in Maryland and in NJ and have never seen that before.

I've never seen that done in lobster traps in South Florida either.

I'd like to learn more.
.

My husband ties the mesh bait bag to the center of the trap.  He claims that rocks would not prevent the bait bag from shifting to one side of the trap as the trap made its way to the ocean floor.  Crabs would then be attempting to get at the bait from outside the trap rather than entering it.

I think I got that right.  I do not think he is about to repeat it to me for the fourth time.

 ::MonkeyHaHa::

Janet


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #793 1/13/09
Post by: Tamikosmom on January 14, 2009, 04:02:16 PM
Well I was suggesting "denim" could be used.. notice the question mark.. ::MonkeyWink::

I think a person needs to think like a POOR Colombian fisherman and NOT a spoiled Rich American sport fisherman.. 
A old pair of blue jeans and you cut off the leg and tie both ends.. makes a nice bag that crabs cant rip up to easy..

Well anyways that is just my thoughts on it..  ::MonkeyRoll::

Edward - you are right, a poor fisherman might use anything including denim to make a bag.  Honestly, denim would probably be my last choice but if that's all ya got.

Would a poor fisherman be using a crab trap the size of the one discovered during Persistence endeavor?

Janet


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #793 1/13/09
Post by: jen3560 on January 14, 2009, 04:02:20 PM
From my understanding the stone can be used inside of a bait bag.
This bag "Denim"? is filled with fish to attrack crabs.. The rock holds the bait bag on the bottom.



Interesting, Edward.

Where do they do it that way?

I've gone crabbing in Maryland and in NJ and have never seen that before.

I've never seen that done in lobster traps in South Florida either.

I'd like to learn more.
.

My husband ties the mesh bait bag to the center of the trap.  He claims that rocks would not prevent the bait bag from shifting to one side of the trap as the trap made its way to the ocean floor.  Crabs would then be attempting to get at the bait from outside the trap rather than entering it.

I think I got that right.  I do not think he is about to repeat it to me for the fourth time.

 ::MonkeyHaHa::

Janet

Hey thanks Janet!

Not being a fisherman myself, that actually makes perfect sense to me!

Tell your hubby you got it!!!!!!  ::MonkeyTongue::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #793 1/13/09
Post by: jen3560 on January 14, 2009, 04:04:10 PM
Well I was suggesting "denim" could be used.. notice the question mark.. ::MonkeyWink::

I think a person needs to think like a POOR Colombian fisherman and NOT a spoiled Rich American sport fisherman.. 
A old pair of blue jeans and you cut off the leg and tie both ends.. makes a nice bag that crabs cant rip up to easy..

Well anyways that is just my thoughts on it..  ::MonkeyRoll::

Edward - you are right, a poor fisherman might use anything including denim to make a bag.  Honestly, denim would probably be my last choice but if that's all ya got.

Would a poor fisherman be using a crab trap the size of the one discovered during Persistence endeavor?

Janet

I wouldn't think he would be quite so poor with that size of trap, after his first haul of crabs.

But again - I'm not a fisherman, just going by watching that show on Discovery about those big ships who fish for crabs, and rake in a TON of dough.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #793 1/13/09
Post by: Tamikosmom on January 14, 2009, 04:04:42 PM
From my understanding the stone can be used inside of a bait bag.
This bag "Denim"? is filled with fish to attrack crabs.. The rock holds the bait bag on the bottom.



Interesting, Edward.

Where do they do it that way?

I've gone crabbing in Maryland and in NJ and have never seen that before.

I've never seen that done in lobster traps in South Florida either.

I'd like to learn more.
.

My husband ties the mesh bait bag to the center of the trap.  He claims that rocks would not prevent the bait bag from shifting to one side of the trap as the trap made its way to the ocean floor.  Crabs would then be attempting to get at the bait from outside the trap rather than entering it.

I think I got that right.  I do not think he is about to repeat it to me for the fourth time.

 ::MonkeyHaHa::

Janet

Hey thanks Janet!

Not being a fisherman myself, that actually makes perfect sense to me!

Tell your hubby you got it!!!!!!  ::MonkeyTongue::

 ::MonkeyTongue::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #793 1/13/09
Post by: bleachedblack on January 14, 2009, 04:04:46 PM
I believe this boat is in the location of where the trap was found. This pic was taken from shore Palm Beach right near Fishermans Huts 12/08.

(http://i118.photobucket.com/albums/o100/klaasen3/Sub5/boattrap.jpg)

Thankyou Klaas. One more correction- picture was taken 12/07


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #793 1/13/09
Post by: jen3560 on January 14, 2009, 04:06:18 PM
thanks bleached!  I believe you are correct.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #793 1/13/09
Post by: bleachedblack on January 14, 2009, 04:09:15 PM
Yes, Jen. The sizing of the photo distorts the perception on the distance from shore.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #793 1/13/09
Post by: Anna on January 14, 2009, 04:11:32 PM
Why is everybody talking about crabs?  Isn't that a FISH trap?  It was my understanding that it was for fish only and not crabs.

And I do think someone with a trap that size would use something much thinner than denim for a bait bag.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #793 1/13/09
Post by: jen3560 on January 14, 2009, 04:11:38 PM
Yes, Jen. The sizing of the photo distorts the perception on the distance from shore.


LOL - that's ok.  I'm terrible at judging distances from pictures like that anyway!  ::MonkeyHaHa::

If you do a reverse, and look from the Dateline footage back toward shore- it's easier, for me anyway, to determine the distance because of the landmarks on shore.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #793 1/13/09
Post by: Anna on January 14, 2009, 04:13:39 PM
Yes, Jen. The sizing of the photo distorts the perception on the distance from shore.


LOL - that's ok.  I'm terrible at judging distances from pictures like that anyway!  ::MonkeyHaHa::

If you do a reverse, and look from the Dateline footage back toward shore- it's easier, for me anyway, to determine the distance because of the landmarks on shore.

Well, what is the approximate distance then?  I have no idea and don't want to just make up something if someone knows and can recall.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #793 1/13/09
Post by: sharon on January 14, 2009, 04:13:42 PM
From my understanding the stone can be used inside of a bait bag.
This bag "Denim"? is filled with fish to attrack crabs.. The rock holds the bait bag on the bottom.



Interesting, Edward.

Where do they do it that way?

I've gone crabbing in Maryland and in NJ and have never seen that before.

I've never seen that done in lobster traps in South Florida either.

I'd like to learn more.
.

The bait was always fastened to the middle of the trap with a clip or tied somehow when we 've gone.  It seems the bags are used in bait pots within certain traps (a cylindrical 'trap within a trap'). 

 :2waver: :fish:



 :2waver:

Never used 'bait pots' for crabs. I come from humble beginnings  ::MonkeyLaugh::





Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #793 1/13/09
Post by: jen3560 on January 14, 2009, 04:13:47 PM
Why is everybody talking about crabs?  Isn't that a FISH trap?  It was my understanding that it was for fish only and not crabs.

And I do think someone with a trap that size would use something much thinner than denim for a bait bag.

I think the nature/type of trap got diminished since 2005 when it was a fish trap.

As the importance of the situation increased, the type/signifigance of the trap decreased to the point where the verbiage being used was confusing to a lot of folks.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #793 1/13/09
Post by: jen3560 on January 14, 2009, 04:14:51 PM
Yes, Jen. The sizing of the photo distorts the perception on the distance from shore.


LOL - that's ok.  I'm terrible at judging distances from pictures like that anyway!  ::MonkeyHaHa::

If you do a reverse, and look from the Dateline footage back toward shore- it's easier, for me anyway, to determine the distance because of the landmarks on shore.

Well, what is the approximate distance then?  I have no idea and don't want to just make up something if someone knows and can recall.

Anna - I believe it was approx 2 miles from shore.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #793 1/13/09
Post by: Anna on January 14, 2009, 04:15:08 PM
Horizon is about 10-12 miles, isn't it?  Can we base anything on that?


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #793 1/13/09
Post by: bleachedblack on January 14, 2009, 04:16:09 PM
Yes, Jen. The sizing of the photo distorts the perception on the distance from shore.


LOL - that's ok.  I'm terrible at judging distances from pictures like that anyway!  ::MonkeyHaHa::

If you do a reverse, and look from the Dateline footage back toward shore- it's easier, for me anyway, to determine the distance because of the landmarks on shore.

I am just saying this is true from personal viewing. I took the pic. ::MonkeyWink::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #793 1/13/09
Post by: Tamikosmom on January 14, 2009, 04:18:55 PM
Why is everybody talking about crabs?  Isn't that a FISH trap?  It was my understanding that it was for fish only and not crabs.

And I do think someone with a trap that size would use something much thinner than denim for a bait bag.


Tim Miller thinks it is a crab trap.

Janet

+++++

The search for Natalee Holloway
TRANSCRIPT
By Chris Hansen
Correspondent
NBC News
updated 5:20 p.m. PT, Fri., Feb. 22, 2008


Tim Miller: In my years of searching we have seen several bodies, skeletal remains--I have seen my own daughter's skeletal remains. I can’t help but believe at this moment that that is human remains in that crab trap.

http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/23301056/page/4/



Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #793 1/13/09
Post by: sharon on January 14, 2009, 04:19:02 PM
From my understanding the stone can be used inside of a bait bag.
This bag "Denim"? is filled with fish to attrack crabs.. The rock holds the bait bag on the bottom.



Interesting, Edward.

Where do they do it that way?

I've gone crabbing in Maryland and in NJ and have never seen that before.

I've never seen that done in lobster traps in South Florida either.

I'd like to learn more.
.

My husband ties the mesh bait bag to the center of the trap.  He claims that rocks would not prevent the bait bag from shifting to one side of the trap as the trap made its way to the ocean floor.  Crabs would then be attempting to get at the bait from outside the trap rather than entering it.

I think I got that right.  I do not think he is about to repeat it to me for the fourth time.

 ::MonkeyHaHa::

Janet

Thanks Janet!

You have saved me from the adventure of trying to meet a commercial fisherman  ::MonkeyHaHa::

For me, fishing is just the 'means' for spending a beautiful day on and in the sea. I do what I am told by the captain. Even drive the boat  ::MonkeyShocked::

I think I should start paying more attention. Apparently I'm doing things wrong  ::MonkeyConfused::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #793 1/13/09
Post by: jen3560 on January 14, 2009, 04:19:13 PM
Yes, Jen. The sizing of the photo distorts the perception on the distance from shore.


LOL - that's ok.  I'm terrible at judging distances from pictures like that anyway!  ::MonkeyHaHa::

If you do a reverse, and look from the Dateline footage back toward shore- it's easier, for me anyway, to determine the distance because of the landmarks on shore.

I am just saying this is true from personal viewing. I took the pic. ::MonkeyWink::

Ah.  Gotcha.  So that was the Panter, and that is when it was at the cage site on Jan 11/12.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #793 1/13/09
Post by: bleachedblack on January 14, 2009, 04:21:32 PM

lol Cuban crabs

(http://www.pbs.org/wnet/nature/files/2008/08/610_cuba_crabs.jpg)


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #793 1/13/09
Post by: Anna on January 14, 2009, 04:23:37 PM
Why is everybody talking about crabs?  Isn't that a FISH trap?  It was my understanding that it was for fish only and not crabs.

And I do think someone with a trap that size would use something much thinner than denim for a bait bag.

I think the nature/type of trap got diminished since 2005 when it was a fish trap.

As the importance of the situation increased, the type/significance of the trap decreased to the point where the verbiage being used was confusing to a lot of folks.


Fish heads, fish heads. . . .Roly, poly fish heads. . . .Eat 'em up, Yum!

One of my kids sang that for three days once.  Closest I think I ever came to getting physical with one of them.  He just refused to stop it and it did get old after that second day of hearing it.

That's a FISH trap.  At least it was in 2005.  Crab traps are usually smaller, aren't they?

And whether or not a hoist was needed would depend on the weight of the contents of the trap?  Good catch, maybe.  Again would also depend on what was in it.  I am not sure but think crabs would weigh more than fish on average because of water in the shells, etc.

Still think that is a fish trap, though.

.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #793 1/13/09
Post by: jen3560 on January 14, 2009, 04:24:11 PM
Yes, Jen. The sizing of the photo distorts the perception on the distance from shore.


LOL - that's ok.  I'm terrible at judging distances from pictures like that anyway!  ::MonkeyHaHa::

If you do a reverse, and look from the Dateline footage back toward shore- it's easier, for me anyway, to determine the distance because of the landmarks on shore.

I am just saying this is true from personal viewing. I took the pic. ::MonkeyWink::

Ah.  Gotcha.  So that was the Panter, and that is when it was at the cage site on Jan 11/12.

Oh wait.  You said Dec 2007 - not Jan 2008.

OK - now I'm confused, LOL.

What boat is that in your pic?


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #793 1/13/09
Post by: bleachedblack on January 14, 2009, 04:30:14 PM
Doesn't appear to be the Panter. Looked more like a cargo type boat.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #793 1/13/09
Post by: Tamikosmom on January 14, 2009, 04:37:42 PM
From my understanding the stone can be used inside of a bait bag.
This bag "Denim"? is filled with fish to attrack crabs.. The rock holds the bait bag on the bottom.



Interesting, Edward.

Where do they do it that way?

I've gone crabbing in Maryland and in NJ and have never seen that before.

I've never seen that done in lobster traps in South Florida either.

I'd like to learn more.
.

My husband ties the mesh bait bag to the center of the trap.  He claims that rocks would not prevent the bait bag from shifting to one side of the trap as the trap made its way to the ocean floor.  Crabs would then be attempting to get at the bait from outside the trap rather than entering it.

I think I got that right.  I do not think he is about to repeat it to me for the fourth time.

 ::MonkeyHaHa::

Janet

Thanks Janet!

You have saved me from the adventure of trying to meet a commercial fisherman  ::MonkeyHaHa::

For me, fishing is just the 'means' for spending a beautiful day on and in the sea. I do what I am told by the captain. Even drive the boat  ::MonkeyShocked::

I think I should start paying more attention. Apparently I'm doing things wrong  ::MonkeyConfused::

Actually ... my husband just crab fishes for sport.  Small trap but ... sometimes there can be as many as 20 crabs when the trap is pulled up to the boat.  However ... there is a size and amount limit.  After throwing back all the undersize ... even by 1/4" ... we are lucky if a 1/2 dozen can be kept.  The process begins again.  After the cost of feeding about 100 crabs and ... only allowed to keep eight ... those eight can be considered very valuable.    A heft fine is the consequence if a fishery's officer were to board our board and ... any undersize crabs are to be found.  The crabs would be used as evidence.

There is the story about a boat that was boarded by a fishery's officer and ... there was a large container with six large but undersize crabs.  The fisherman claimed that they were pets and ... he brought them to the ocean each day for a swim and ... when he whistled they would return to the boat.  The officer was skeptical.  "OK.  Demonstrate" ... he instructed.  The fisherman threw the six crabs overboard and ... in a minute he whistled but ... not one crab returned.  The officer as where the crabs were and ... the fisherman said ... "What crabs?"

 ::MonkeyHaHa::

Janet



Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #793 1/13/09
Post by: Nut44x4 on January 14, 2009, 04:40:04 PM
Why is everybody talking about crabs?  Isn't that a FISH trap?  It was my understanding that it was for fish only and not crabs.

And I do think someone with a trap that size would use something much thinner than denim for a bait bag.

The only Crabs found around Aruba are way too small to be caught in any trap...unless it is the sticky like fly catcher trap hang up thingy...hehe...those buggars would stick to those.  ::MonkeyHaHa::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #793 1/13/09
Post by: Anna on January 14, 2009, 04:47:05 PM
Well, anybody want to talk about Crawdads?  Only kind of crustaceans we have around here but they are pretty good with the proper seasoning.



Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #793 1/13/09
Post by: Tamikosmom on January 14, 2009, 04:52:16 PM

lol Cuban crabs

(http://www.pbs.org/wnet/nature/files/2008/08/610_cuba_crabs.jpg)

The scene reflects an Autumn day in the Fraser Valley of British Columbia.

 ::MonkeyHaHa::

Janet


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #793 1/13/09
Post by: Anna on January 14, 2009, 04:55:07 PM
Actually ... my husband just crab fishes for sport.  Small trap but ... sometimes there can be as many as 20 crabs when the trap is pulled up to the boat.  However ... there is a size and amount limit.  After throwing back all the undersize ... even by 1/4" ... we are lucky if a 1/2 dozen can be kept.  The process begins again.  After the cost of feeding about 100 crabs and ... only allowed to keep eight ... those eight can be considered very valuable.    A heft fine is the consequence if a fishery's officer were to board our board and ... any undersize crabs are to be found.  The crabs would be used as evidence.

There is the story about a boat that was boarded by a fishery's officer and ... there was a large container with six large but undersize crabs.  The fisherman claimed that they were pets and ... he brought them to the ocean each day for a swim and ... when he whistled they would return to the boat.  The officer was skeptical.  "OK.  Demonstrate" ... he instructed.  The fisherman threw the six crabs overboard and ... in a minute he whistled but ... not one crab returned.  The officer as where the crabs were and ... the fisherman said ... "What crabs?"

 ::MonkeyHaHa::

Janet





 ::MonkeyHaHa:: ::MonkeyHaHa:: ::MonkeyHaHa::


Maybe it's just an idea I have fixed in my noggin but I tend to think of cold water for crabs, lobster and salmon.


Don't think there are good crabs in warm water.  Could be wrong about that, but think they some how started calling it a crab trap when it really isn't.

Not sure why that happened. 


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #793 1/13/09
Post by: jen3560 on January 14, 2009, 04:55:23 PM
As to a Colombian fisherman.

OE posted at SM:

March 18, 2008, 10:21:41 AM
The potential issues of a Venezuelan fishing vessel passing through:
- The location of the trap is significantly out of the way for passing through vessels
- The location of the trap is not in an area where fishermen fish with commercial traps 

March 18, 2008, 12:22:38 PM

Jan 9th through 13th I was off the boat and staying at the Holiday Inn for a much-needed break.  I walked up and down the beach many times a day.  On the 11th and 12th, I noticed the Dutch coast guard vessel at or VERY near the trap site.  I talked to a wind surfer instructor who claims to be at the beach every day for 8 years.  He said the boat always comes up the shore just south of where we were standing, turns away and heads offshore.  He said it never goes where it was and has never seen it stop.
The vessel was on that spot for 42 minutes that day and about the same duration the next day.  I triangulated it's position the best I could using a wrist watch and a few points on land.  It was right on the target location based on the measurements


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #793 1/13/09
Post by: bleachedblack on January 14, 2009, 04:55:26 PM
Why is everybody talking about crabs?  Isn't that a FISH trap?  It was my understanding that it was for fish only and not crabs.

And I do think someone with a trap that size would use something much thinner than denim for a bait bag.

The only Crabs found around Aruba are way too small to be caught in any trap...unless it is the sticky like fly catcher trap hang up thingy...hehe...those buggars would stick to those.  ::MonkeyHaHa::

 ::MonkeyLaugh:: ::MonkeyLaugh::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #793 1/13/09
Post by: Tamikosmom on January 14, 2009, 05:06:19 PM
Why is everybody talking about crabs?  Isn't that a FISH trap?  It was my understanding that it was for fish only and not crabs.

And I do think someone with a trap that size would use something much thinner than denim for a bait bag.

The only Crabs found around Aruba are way too small to be caught in any trap...unless it is the sticky like fly catcher trap hang up thingy...hehe...those buggars would stick to those.  ::MonkeyHaHa::

 ::MonkeyHaHa::

I have not seen a "fly catcher trap hang up thingy" for years.  Can they still be purchased?  We have a couple of battery operated fly swatters.  No more smashing flies up against your wall ... you just zap them.

  ::MonkeyShocked::

Janet



Na


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #793 1/13/09
Post by: Anna on January 14, 2009, 05:12:31 PM
Yes, they still make the fly trap sticky paper.  I use it around puppies where nothing else is safe.  However now there is a parasite thingy that you put out every month and it destroys the flies in the larvae stage.  Comes in a package with wood shavings and you dump out near source of flies such as a barn.

Works well, too.

Ah, science and technology.


 ::MonkeyConfused::



Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #793 1/13/09
Post by: Kermit on January 14, 2009, 05:12:37 PM
Here is more from Hodges about the missing trap, and what they used to make their mock up:

http://forensicthoughtprints.com/aruba/default.html

The Cage
The fisherman also noticed that a large fishing cage stored behind the first of the three Fisherman's Huts at the southern-most corner was missing. The cage had been there approximately a month since about Good Friday, March 25, 2005. The cage belonged to another fisherman who kept his boat next to these four huts. The boat was still there. But the cage was missing.

The fisherman described the cage as made of 3/8-inch iron (such as that used in concrete reinforcing—"rebar") with a frame size approximately 5 ½ feet by 4 feet by 17 inches. He described it as a large fishing cage with its frame wrapped in chicken wire with its familiar hexagonal openings but with an opening in one panel which allowed them to trap fish. He believed that, given its size and weight, it would take two men to manage the cage. Once aboard, it would lay low on the floor of the nearby fishing boat.

 



there was no cage missing
H.Mos told that in his last press conference.
the cage was at the FM's house

Ain't it interesting how Hans Mos repeats Julia Renfro's post. Note the date, well after the evidence was retrieved from Jan. 7th dive to the cage/trap

Glenda Posted: Sat Mar 01, 2008 8:48 pm
Kyle is FOS

Dear Kyle,

Your efforts to recover Natalee are applauded, but I'm sorry to tell you that there was never a Crab/Fish Trap stolen. There is no indication that Natalee is in a Crab/Fish Trap or her remains could possibly be found off the coast of Aruba. Moss said you are looking for a needle in a haystack.

Feel free to search... But DON'T SAY THAT ARUBA DOESN'T HAVE the capabilities to search for Natalee. 10s of Millions have been spent searching for Natalee. Where was the Persistence when the Dutch was asked for their expertise in your home port Louisiana after Katrina?

Don't compare your misinformed efforts to what the Dutch is more than capable of doing if there were valid indications.

Regards from Aruba


Hans Mos now states: "The cage that they said that was found is not the cage that was taken from the hut. since the owner of the Cage at the Hut had his cage at his house for repair"


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #793 1/13/09
Post by: Anna on January 14, 2009, 05:16:56 PM


.
And Julia has never been known to lie, lol. . . . . . .

Must be why Mos would take her word for something.  She may well be his source for that little tidbit.


.
 ::MonkeyHaHa::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #793 1/13/09
Post by: Kermit on January 14, 2009, 05:17:45 PM
CAGE
#691 on: March 18, 2008, 10:21:41 AM
We've internally discussed the possibility of a "post office" of sorts while awaiting forensic testing results. 
The problems with this theory include: 
-little or no evident anchor scars from a boat or boats at or anywhere near the site which would support diving ops.
-The trap shows no apparent evidence of human tampering one would expect from in situ placement and removal of objects inside the trap. The sand inside the trap shows no disruption.  The soft growth on the trap shows no obvious scars, where something scrapes or slides on the trap during a placement or withdrawal
http://scaredmonkeys.net/index.php?topic=2705.msg366270#msg366270


#682 on: March 18, 2008, 09:28:45 AM
Any ideas of who may have possessed such a trap?
Approx. 7.5 x 7.5 x 2.5ft, and 200-300lbs, hundreds of feet of rope complete with 4-point rigging
http://scaredmonkeys.net/index.php?topic=2705.msg366260#msg366260

Kyle said: "The trap in question is significantly larger than Dr. Hodges reported dimensions from the fishermen huts owner. http://www.refugeesunleashed.net/about13702.html

Jan 27, 2008 - The Aruba Coast Guard boarded the Persistence for a friendly visit at 0810 hrs this morning.
 Sun 27-Jan 2355 hrs. "The possibility exists that they revisited the cage and did a site sweep, sampling more items including human remains around the 12th of Jan when I witnessed the Dutch Coast Guard on the site two days in a row.



Kyle said: "This is a picture taken right next to the fisherman's hut that was allegedly broken into.  The picture shows the cut-away spot in the brush where we believe the trap was stored.  There are branches cut off and rub marks on other branches indicating a trap of at least 6-7' wide may have been in the spot.  The cut-away was symmetrical.   The trap we found was too large to fit inside the fish hut door (see attached picture of the fish hut door that was replaced after the break-in).


(http://img104.imageshack.us/img104/2158/image560ad8.jpg)


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #793 1/13/09
Post by: jen3560 on January 14, 2009, 05:23:42 PM
Thanks Kerm!

That was precisely why I was questioning the validity of the dimensions given to hodges by that fisherman.

Because of that picture and what Kyle said about it.

Kyle said: "This is a picture taken right next to the fisherman's hut that was allegedly broken into.  The picture shows the cut-away spot in the brush where we believe the trap was stored.  There are branches cut off and rub marks on other branches indicating a trap of at least 6-7' wide  may have been in the spot.  The cut-away was symmetrical.   The trap we found was too large to fit inside the fish hut door (see attached picture of the fish hut door that was replaced after the break-in).


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #793 1/13/09
Post by: Kermit on January 14, 2009, 05:24:40 PM
The test trap is no where near the actual size of the trap that was actually found.
jmho

Blonde.. That family photo does not include a picture of Luis in it that I can see.
I have a picture of Luis here I will find it and post it.


I would beg to differ - it is approx 2 feet smaller than the one found.  According to Kyle's estimation of measurements on the cage found.



I am just looking at the divers around the trap found and they are small compared to the trap..
But what ever works for ya. ::MonkeyWink::

I beleive there's a post somewhere from Kyle to PI explaining the distortion from the camera lens.

The trap was symmetrical in width and length at approximately 7.5 ft. It was approximately 2.25-2.5 ft high.  You're correct about the ROV video lens distorting perspective due to the paralax view lens. 
http://scaredmonkeys.net/index.php?topic=2668.msg360072#msg360072



Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #793 1/13/09
Post by: jen3560 on January 14, 2009, 05:29:37 PM
Doesn't appear to be the Panter. Looked more like a cargo type boat.

My miskate - and my apologies.

I think I may have been confusing that pic with another one that people were posting about being the Panter here.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #793 1/13/09
Post by: Kermit on January 14, 2009, 05:31:01 PM


.
And Julia has never been known to lie, lol. . . . . . .

Must be why Mos would take her word for something.  She may well be his source for that little tidbit.


.
 ::MonkeyHaHa::

That is exactly what I was thinking Anna.



Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #793 1/13/09
Post by: Kermit on January 14, 2009, 05:31:52 PM
Kyle said originally that they were searching where they were based on the confession of one of the suspects, who we now presume to be Joran.

Kyle said: "Here's a shocker: the confession from one of the former suspects I was refering to was NOT Joran.

Kyle said: "FYI, we're not stupid. We wouldn't do anything involving forensics even if we had to. Whatever we do will be under the blessing and cooperation of Aruban authorities and the proper people at every stage of this project.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #793 1/13/09
Post by: Kermit on January 14, 2009, 05:33:16 PM
CAGE
#691 on: March 18, 2008, 10:21:41 AM
We've internally discussed the possibility of a "post office" of sorts while awaiting forensic testing results. 
The problems with this theory include: 
-little or no evident anchor scars from a boat or boats at or anywhere near the site which would support diving ops.
-The trap shows no apparent evidence of human tampering one would expect from in situ placement and removal of objects inside the trap. The sand inside the trap shows no disruption.  The soft growth on the trap shows no obvious scars, where something scrapes or slides on the trap during a placement or withdrawal
http://scaredmonkeys.net/index.php?topic=2705.msg366270#msg366270


#682 on: March 18, 2008, 09:28:45 AM
Any ideas of who may have possessed such a trap?
Approx. 7.5 x 7.5 x 2.5ft, and 200-300lbs, hundreds of feet of rope complete with 4-point rigging
http://scaredmonkeys.net/index.php?topic=2705.msg366260#msg366260

Kyle said: "The trap in question is significantly larger than Dr. Hodges reported dimensions from the fishermen huts owner. http://www.refugeesunleashed.net/about13702.html





Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #793 1/13/09
Post by: Tamikosmom on January 14, 2009, 05:34:40 PM
I find it highly suspicious that no other target was explored following the retrieval of the contents of the trap/cage.  The Persistence packed and left Aruba ....

Janet

++++++++

oceanexploration
Re: Natalee Case Discussion #737 2/29 -
« Reply #713 on: March 01, 2008, 07:07:54 PM »


It would be rotten of me to lurk and not comment about our departure.  I agree, it feels absolutely awkward leaving.  I know it seems there are more questions now than before the search even began.  The only comfort and comment I can affort is knowing that many questions will be answered in time. 

As for the remaining targets:
There are between 100-200 targets yet to be explored.  Remember, we are searching for anything that could contain human remains, not just a fish trap. It's likely most of these remaining targets are simply debris or unimportant seabed features.  However, we originally set out to leave no stone unturned.  The plan is (as of today-plans do often change) to return to these targets once we've secured adequate funding with a dedicated ROV team on a different boat.  A different boat would be more efficient at running ROV operations both in terms of maneuvering and cost. 

-The Aruban authorities do not know our target list, nor have the capability to investigate most of the targets. 
-AF2 is on the Island.  To me this indicates Cheney is on the island, but I can't confirm this nor comment on the reason for the visit.
-The trap in question is significantly larger than Dr. Hodges reported dimensions from the fishermen huts owner.

http://scaredmonkeys.net/index.php?topic=2662.msg358604;topicseen#msg358604


oceanexploration
Re: Natalee Case Discussion #739 3/3 -
« Reply #92 on: March 03, 2008, 06:35:58 PM »


The trap was symmetrical in width and length at approximately 7.5 ft. It was approximately 2.25-2.5 ft high.  You're correct about the ROV video lens distorting perspective due to the paralax view lens. 

http://scaredmonkeys.net/index.php?topic=2668.msg360072#msg360072



Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #793 1/13/09
Post by: jen3560 on January 14, 2009, 05:36:33 PM
Kyle said originally that they were searching where they were based on the confession of one of the suspects, who we now presume to be Joran.

Kyle said: "Here's a shocker: the confession from one of the former suspects I was refering to was NOT Joran.

Kyle said: "FYI, we're not stupid. We wouldn't do anything involving forensics even if we had to. Whatever we do will be under the blessing and cooperation of Aruban authorities and the proper people at every stage of this project.


Makes you wonder who the other 'confessor' was, and Why that was given zero credence by Mos, in conjunction with Joran's confession to Patrick.

Not to mention Mos having been on board Persistence for (at least) Dec 29 dive.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #793 1/13/09
Post by: Tamikosmom on January 14, 2009, 05:39:54 PM
Kyle said originally that they were searching where they were based on the confession of one of the suspects, who we now presume to be Joran.

Kyle said: "Here's a shocker: the confession from one of the former suspects I was refering to was NOT Joran.

Kyle said: "FYI, we're not stupid. We wouldn't do anything involving forensics even if we had to. Whatever we do will be under the blessing and cooperation of Aruban authorities and the proper people at every stage of this project.  


private eye
Re: Natalee Case Discussion #746 4/4
« Reply #499 on: April 09, 2008, 12:39:50 AM »


If I understood Kyle correctly, and that would be that the Arubans retrieved and possessed all finds, not sharing anything with the crew, then that effort was a waste of time and effort. The only thing it could have accomplished was to locate additional evidence for the Arubans to destroy. I am not sure if that was the protocol out of Aruba's waters though. The effort was superb, but the game was fixed.

http://scaredmonkeys.net/index.php?topic=2769.msg372245;topicseen#msg372245


private eye
Re: Natalee Case Discussion #742 3/10 -
« Reply #686 on: March 13, 2008, 06:38:07 PM »


But sharing information with people who work for people who are directly orchestrating the cover up, Rudy, or the Dutch, is the most irresponsible investigating I can imagine. What kills this investigation is people having to come into it, wanting to apply basic investigatory protocols into place, and then having those channels sabotage the new evidence that the new players discover. Of course, as is happened everytime in this case, the new people eventually come to a point where the manipulation of the evidence is undeniable, but by then the fruits of their work are gone, and there is simply another member of the believers of the cover up group. What I pray that Kyle and the crew of the Persistence will determine, is that  regardless of how hard working the man that they are working with appears to work, his work belongs to Rudy, and Rudy belongs to the local dutch.

We are not hysterical, ignorant, paranoid people. We have seen the cover up in action, in broad daylight, with impunity, and if you disregard our warnings, you will become the next chump in a series of chumps, no matter how sophisticated your equipment, the level of your educational achievement, or the extent of your job skills and work history.

http://scaredmonkeys.net/index.php?topic=2689.msg364750#msg364750




Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #793 1/13/09
Post by: Kermit on January 14, 2009, 05:42:24 PM
Since December 15th, an oil exploration crew from south Louisiana has used sonar equipment to scour Aruba's ocean floor looking for Natalee.Tuesday, Jan 01, 2008 - 11:19 PM Updated: 11:34 PMBy Jennifer Hale

January 7 the ROV dives down to the cage and evidence is gathered

January 17 CAPS puts his first post at SM
January 22, 2008, 01:32:49 AM - Caps posted his theory about what he thinks happened
January 26 Kyle puts a post on his blog about how the Aruba dive team are so trustworthy and have become good friends
January 27 The Aruba Coast Guard boarded the Persistence for a friendly visit at 0810 hrs this morning. For an hour we shared coffee, traded T-shirts, swapped stories, and showed them our progress.

Jan. 21 - 10 days before the Ranger Rover confession Kyle met downtown in public with Mos
(date tapes were released, Jan. 31 st is when Beth saw them with DeVries)

Jan 27, 2008 - The Aruba Coast Guard boarded the Persistence for a friendly visit at 0810 hrs this morning.  Sun 27-Jan 2355 hrs. "The possibility exists that they revisited the cage and did a site sweep, sampling more items including human remains around the 12th of Jan when I witnessed the Dutch Coast Guard on the site two days in a row.

January 31, 2008 - CAPS emails Dave Holloway

February 01, 2008, 09:52:13 PM CAPS posts:
Montana Apartments
http://scaredmonkeys.net/index.php?topic=1952.1620

February 01, 2008, 10:26:49 PM
CAPS POSTS: The Montana Park Apartment is where all started..The Sex etc...
http://scaredmonkeys.net/index.php?topic=1952.1620

February 9, 2008 - Jossy Mansur: A man claims he found a telephone behind the lighthouse in 2005; it was broken; he fixed it and dialed a person with the phone, so his story goes. The person apparently answered and said that that number belonged to Paulus Van der Sloot. The man is now giving testimony to the police. Late, but still important enough to be taken into consideration.

Caps emails Dave: I have spoken to John and he is in contact with MOS.

Feb 26CAPS posted: Reply #2727 on: February 26, 2008, 09:29:40 AM
The pond in question (MOKO) is right out near the Whitehouse Apartment.
http://scaredmonkeys.net/index.php?topic=1952.2720

CAPS posted: Reply #2729 on: February 26, 2008, 10:36:09 AM
Look for Noord and look for Moko.
http://scaredmonkeys.net/index.php?topic=1952.2720

Find Aruba. Look for Noord. Look for Montaña. Look for Moko
CAPS posted:  Reply #7 on: April 15, 2008, 09:24:02 AM »
they where located in Moko and where in the massages bussines
now lets look at the addess to the Dutch Apartmnts

Posted 2nd week of FEB: KYLE:  The FBI did not comment on the remains, but rather the fabric sample.
scaredmonkeys.net/index.php?topic=2705.700

Feb 17th through the 23  - Kyle Kingman based on his agreement with Tim Tehran and Louis Schafer flew to the east coast to meet with Executives of the networks.
                            for the purpose of selling the ROV/VIDEOS of the trap/cage.
http://scaredmonkeys.net/index.php?topic=2654.msg357222#msg357222

Kyle said: "The producer from 20/20 asked me if I saw the badges or credentials of the police officers. I had a total DEAR LORD moment, but recalled seeing the three divers several times with other police in uniform. Also the leader of the three I later saw with a badge.

Kyle said: "Dave was involved with the search until the 30th of Dec from an information-only level. I don't know if he knows anything about the blue denim-like fabric and have no reason to suspect that he does. I would say he knows as much as Beth, perhaps slightly more. It's time Beth knows what the truth is about that trap"

Kyle said: "Right before the Dateline special aired Tim and Louis asked if I could go to ABC to try to sell the footage in an attempt to recoup some of the money invested in the search efforts"
Everything remained in my possesion.

The ROV/Video images, never given to the family or FBI.

Feb. 22, 2008Kyle posted at BFN: This program was originally pitched by NBC to Tim Miller to be a docuentary about TES and turned into a documenary about the Search for Natalee Holloway's body.  It seems NBC shamelessly used Tim Miller to get on board the Persistence during the search

Feb. 22, 2008 = NBC Dateline special.  http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/23261368/

Reply #494 on: February 26, 2008, 08:55:26 PM »
Bad news on the search.  Persistence has completed the underwater survey/grid.  Have identified 100+ objects and trying to narrow the list.  However, they are totally out of money.  If they can't come up with donations within a week or 10 days they will have to go home.
Dave Holloway has been talking to various officials to help chip in.

Without contributions Persistence is coming home.
http://scaredmonkeys.net/index.php?topic=2641.480

KYLE posts that when the crew from Persistence was searching the pond, AMIGO took pictures, they didn't call the press and the polis knew and Amigo knew prior to the pond search. Someone leaked.

Kyle: "This is what I'm trying to figure out now. I need to know the leak! I believe Caps is only one step away from DirtyHand."

Caps said: "my uncle is a Lawyer and He always talk abaout to have Roll duty."
Caps said his brother told him what Mos was upset about before Mos made any statements publically

FEB 28th -  the Persistence sudden departure and asking for money to continue the search.

February 29KYLE TO RED: "Let me make myself perfectly clear.  Your bitterness towards me is neither my fault nor my concern.  If what you said is true and Tim Miller said something making you feel entitled to be on board this boat at some point, he was mistaken.  It was not his decision, nor mine"

March 1 - RV Persistence announced it is leaving Aruba http://blogsfornatalee.com/forum/index.php?topic=8398.0
March 3 - John meets with Caps
March 3 - Kyle learns that the screenshots he sent to the FBI - the FBI sent to Dave and Dave's wife, Robin posted them on the internet.
March 3 - LegalLEx posts at BFN: "I think an immediate agenda many of us have taken on is... to continue... trying to find significant funding/donations... to finish the search... at least of those 150 (or so) targets that may yield Natalee and... maybe... evidence.
<snip>
Since John does not deal with the financing portion, (TES and Louis do),


April 7 KYle said: I'm uncertain as to whom Caps has been talking about. This witness wouldn't talk to police and would only talk to us at first through his lawyer.








Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #793 1/13/09
Post by: Tamikosmom on January 14, 2009, 05:45:51 PM
Kyle said originally that they were searching where they were based on the confession of one of the suspects, who we now presume to be Joran.

Kyle said: "Here's a shocker: the confession from one of the former suspects I was refering to was NOT Joran.

Kyle said: "FYI, we're not stupid. We wouldn't do anything involving forensics even if we had to. Whatever we do will be under the blessing and cooperation of Aruban authorities and the proper people at every stage of this project.


Makes you wonder who the other 'confessor' was, and Why that was given zero credence by Mos, in conjunction with Joran's confession to Patrick.

Not to mention Mos having been on board Persistence for (at least) Dec 29 dive.


The search for Natalee Holloway
TRANSCRIPT
By Chris Hansen
Correspondent
NBC News
updated 5:20 p.m. PT, Fri., Feb. 22, 2008


Dave Holloway: I got a phone call from Tim.

Chris Hansen: And what'd he say?

Dave Holloway: He told me, he said, "Dave, we found her."

Chris Hansen: "We found her?"

Dave Holloway: Yeah. I said, "Are you sure?" and he said, "I’m 99.9 percent sure." He said, "We hadn't gone down and dove under or anything. But the photographs--" he said, "I tell you, Dave." I-- he said, "That's what we're looking for. And that's gotta-- that-- that's it."

Chris Hansen: Did you think that was it?

Dave Holloway: I did.

And the Holloways weren't alone. The next day Aruban authorities, including chief prosecutor Hans Mos, came on board to see for themselves.

Tim Miller: We showed them what we had. I think they got real interested, too. We all thought we had something.

The Aruban authorities agreed the find looked promising. And finally, divers from the Persistence and the Aruban police set out to get an up-close look.  

http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/23301056/page/4/



Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #793 1/13/09
Post by: Kermit on January 14, 2009, 05:47:53 PM
I know that Caps emailed Dave, but because Dave didn't understand what Caps was saying, he didn't
respond to him.

So that is when lalasmom emailed Dave.

Then they  got the permission to search Monserat pond based on Caps & a witness.

The witness contacted Helen Lejuez (who is Dave's attorney in Aruba).

Helen then contacted Aruba Polis.

The witness gave a statement and that is why they allowed the Persistence to search the pond with the side sonar.

Kyle mentioned he saw tires and some other targets on the pictures from that sonar search.
Then all the posts about how they were going to drain that pond and search it further only to find out it was dry.








Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #793 1/13/09
Post by: Kermit on January 14, 2009, 05:50:26 PM
Kyle said: "I think rocks in the cage are very unusual and indicate amateurs in opposed to fishermen disposed of the cage.


(http://img88.imageshack.us/img88/7130/fishcageinboatey4.jpg)

Kyle said: "In my opinion the trap was dropped purposefully where it was. Perhaps the strongest argument I have is it's contents.

(http://img301.imageshack.us/img301/4464/image371oa9.jpg)


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #793 1/13/09
Post by: Edward on January 14, 2009, 05:52:06 PM
At this point what do we hope to do about the trap ?
From what I can see, not much can be done now..


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #793 1/13/09
Post by: Kermit on January 14, 2009, 05:52:35 PM
thank you texasmom, I ate that tasty fly you left for me as my snack today.
ribbit


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #793 1/13/09
Post by: Kermit on January 14, 2009, 05:54:00 PM
At this point what do we hope to do about the trap ?
From what I can see, not much can be done now..


Put pressure on them.
They covered up evidence.




Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #793 1/13/09
Post by: jen3560 on January 14, 2009, 05:55:19 PM
At this point what do we hope to do about the trap ?
From what I can see, not much can be done now..


Lots can be done, actually.

US officials can subpoena Persistence records, testimony from those on board, and an accounting of personal and business financials.

At that point our State Dept would have to step in, and request cooperation from Aruba/The Hague regarding the findings from step one, and obtaining evidence/testimony from the Aruban side of things.

Satisfactory results, however, may be a different story.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #793 1/13/09
Post by: Blonde on January 14, 2009, 05:57:00 PM
The Antilla is located on the west coast not far from  Malmok Beach
And there was that cage also (in the same area )



I don't think this is anywhere near where the cage and remains were found.

picture - next to last row from bottom

DSC01316 - The above-water portion of the Antilla  - a great Pelican perch
http://www.pbase.com/icicle50/aruba

the shallow waters a few hundred yards off the coast  of Aruba, the wreckage of the German freighter Antilla can be found. ...
www.coldwarhistory.us/Exhibitions/History/Antilla_in_Aruba/body_antilla_ in_aruba.html  post #2   

arubalisaPlease do not try to swim the .40 mile to the Antilla  snorkel for "x" amount of time and then swim back to shore against the wind and current.

The last person who I heard who attempted this was rescued via dinghy by a member of the Jolly Pirates crew who luckily for the snorkeler, happened to be nearby.snipped

http://www.aruba.com/forum/f10/snorkeling-antilla-32925/
------------------

I do believe that the cage was found further than .4 of a mile offshore.  And in none of the video footage can there be seen this "above water" portion of the wreckage.



(http://i18.photobucket.com/albums/b104/Blondeonahd/persistence/Sample_K3000_SSLarge2.jpg)
The above image is a sample side scan sonar image to illustrate the type of imaging and resolution a high quality digital side scan sonar is capable of acquiring. A wreck (~150ft long 3-masted schooner) is laying upright on the seabed. The dark area to the left of the wreck is the acoustic shadow. A crab trap similar in size and character to the one we will be searching for thought to contain the remains is seen near the bow of the wreck, shown by the black arrow.

After the side scan sonar trials, the ROV (remotely operated vehicle) team and acoustic positioning personnel moves in on location. We moved to a site with about 100ft water depth, adequate to test the acoustic positioning equipment with the ROV. We deployed and calibrated a compatt (computing and telemetry transponder) and then deployed the SeaEye Falcon 1266 ROV. Once in the water, the ROV was tested for telemetry and video functionality. The ROV performed flawlessly.


http://scaredmonkeys.net/index.php?topic=4145.0


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #793 1/13/09
Post by: Kermit on January 14, 2009, 05:57:27 PM
(http://img90.imageshack.us/img90/3183/tennisshoecomparisonsv3.jpg)


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #793 1/13/09
Post by: Kermit on January 14, 2009, 05:58:22 PM
Excellent Blonde.
I was looking for that!
Thank you.



Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #793 1/13/09
Post by: Kermit on January 14, 2009, 05:59:01 PM
Clyde Burke is Caps friend.



Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #793 1/13/09
Post by: Kermit on January 14, 2009, 06:02:25 PM
(http://img530.imageshack.us/img530/6031/image561cw2.jpg)

(http://img520.imageshack.us/img520/3516/image562yx2.jpg)


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #793 1/13/09
Post by: Tamikosmom on January 14, 2009, 06:02:36 PM
At this point what do we hope to do about the trap ?
From what I can see, not much can be done now..


Lots can be done, actually.

US officials can subpoena Persistence records, testimony from those on board, and an accounting of personal and business financials.

At that point our State Dept would have to step in, and request cooperation from Aruba/The Hague regarding the findings from step one, and obtaining evidence/testimony from the Aruban side of things.

Satisfactory results, however, may be a different story.

Jen ... the question is ... "Is the American "powers that be" taking any action."  Are words of posts submitted to private or public sites considered evidence enough for authorities to act.  Kyle Kingman only has to distance himself from from the words in his posts.  The only person that he has defamed is John Silvetti and ... I believe that John Silvetti only wants to tippy toe away from the entire issue.

Janet.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #793 1/13/09
Post by: texasmom on January 14, 2009, 06:09:26 PM
thank you texasmom, I ate that tasty fly you left for me as my snack today.
ribbit


You're welcome Kermit!   ::MonkeyCool::



Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #793 1/13/09
Post by: Cageman on January 14, 2009, 06:10:10 PM


Cageman,
I've been very curious since your comment about being involved in forensics.  Have you seen the pictures that were reportedly taken by the ROV on board the Persistence?  If so, would you be willing to share your thoughts on the photos?  If you're not comfortable doing so for any reason I understand.  I would just like to know your opinion if you are willing to share it.

Thanks in advance.

tm
I really wish I could enlighten you but for me it is impossible to say something useful about those photographs.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #793 1/13/09
Post by: texasmom on January 14, 2009, 06:12:48 PM


Cageman,
I've been very curious since your comment about being involved in forensics.  Have you seen the pictures that were reportedly taken by the ROV on board the Persistence?  If so, would you be willing to share your thoughts on the photos?  If you're not comfortable doing so for any reason I understand.  I would just like to know your opinion if you are willing to share it.

Thanks in advance.

tm
I really wish I could enlighten you but for me it is impossible to say something useful about those photographs.

Thanks for the response Cageman.   


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #793 1/13/09
Post by: jen3560 on January 14, 2009, 06:14:59 PM
At this point what do we hope to do about the trap ?
From what I can see, not much can be done now..


Lots can be done, actually.

US officials can subpoena Persistence records, testimony from those on board, and an accounting of personal and business financials.

At that point our State Dept would have to step in, and request cooperation from Aruba/The Hague regarding the findings from step one, and obtaining evidence/testimony from the Aruban side of things.

Satisfactory results, however, may be a different story.

Jen ... the question is ... "Is the American "powers that be" taking any action."  Are words of posts submitted to private or public sites considered evidence enough for authorities to act.  Kyle Kingman only has to distance himself from from the words in his posts.  The only person that he has defamed is John Silvetti and ... I believe that John Silvetti only wants to tippy toe away from the entire issue.

Janet.

I don't think that would be very easy for him to do, Janet.  He has shared not only some pretty powerful words, but also those images.

Both of which can be proven as being made/submitted by him.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #793 1/13/09
Post by: Anna on January 14, 2009, 06:19:22 PM
I don't think our Dept of State will do anything to jeopardize the FOB base in Aruba especially now with the Ruskies entering into drilling agreements with Uncle Hugo.

That ups the ante a bit, IMO.



Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #793 1/13/09
Post by: Edward on January 14, 2009, 06:25:27 PM
So it is believed the fellow who took the Aruba Bay video who had dark legs, actually knew the body was in the plastic he videoed, which could also be a large plastic taken from a trash container witnessed by a Colombian male. Who could also have dark legs.. Natalee's body was supposedly put into plastic and taken away in a white pick up..
 Taken to this culvert and placed there temporary..?
 later taken to another location and somehow eventually put into a crab/fish trap and dropped off the boat into 90 some feet of water..

Then there is various other witnesses and Internet bloggers and lots of thing we have discussed over the last 3.7 years now..
Take a look.. http://s66.photobucket.com/albums/h254/chicagoutfit/?start=all

Then there is Marcos near the end..

A large scale cover up by a government and or organized crime syndicate....


The one thing I have to say about all of this is,..
A famous psychic who lives in my neck of the woods was interviewed within 2 weeks of Natalee disappearing by me and I have it on tape..
She insisted at that time Natalee was in the ocean.. I believed she was in Venezuela.
She has never contacted the family ..Nor has she posted her thoughts on the Internet..
She has stayed silent.
I still have her on tape...  and The F.B.I. contacted her before I did..They wanted to know her opinion.. She also told them Natalee was in the ocean..
 Never said she was in a fish/crab trap and has never been contacted for approximate location of where Natalee may have been placed..
 I remember her words about the people involved.. Very dangerous people/ she sensed drug dealers and murders.. Also her words about how far out...Way Out !
 Also her last words.. Before this is over Many Nations will be involved.
It is all on tape... It is dated..
It appears she was correct.. and she always impressed me as honesty without any hesitation ..
Her name, Annette Martin.
I found it very interesting the fbi called her so quickly.. as she has advised them before.

There were other predictions .. Like this one who felt compelled to contact the family.
 http://www.marybrents.com/missing.htm

But Annette has strick rules on this.. I am just amazed at how accurate she was.
I did contact her and gave her a link to the Persistance web site.. I wonder what she thinks of all of this today..

She did say that the body would not be found..
Oh well.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #793 1/13/09
Post by: Tamikosmom on January 14, 2009, 06:32:28 PM
At this point what do we hope to do about the trap ?
From what I can see, not much can be done now..


Lots can be done, actually.

US officials can subpoena Persistence records, testimony from those on board, and an accounting of personal and business financials.

At that point our State Dept would have to step in, and request cooperation from Aruba/The Hague regarding the findings from step one, and obtaining evidence/testimony from the Aruban side of things.

Satisfactory results, however, may be a different story.

Jen ... the question is ... "Is the American "powers that be" taking any action."  Are words of posts submitted to private or public sites considered evidence enough for authorities to act.  Kyle Kingman only has to distance himself from from the words in his posts.  The only person that he has defamed is John Silvetti and ... I believe that John Silvetti only wants to tippy toe away from the entire issue.

Janet.

I don't think that would be very easy for him to do, Janet.  He has shared not only some pretty powerful words, but also those images.

Both of which can be proven as being made/submitted by him.

Jen ... I sincerely hope you are right.

Considering Beth Holloway ... John Q. Kelly and ... the FBI have received all the information/ images four/five months ago ... why is the ball not rolling more quickly.  Time is an ally of all those associated with actions that have prevented justice form prevailing for Natalee Holloway.

Janet


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #793 1/13/09
Post by: Tamikosmom on January 14, 2009, 06:38:42 PM
I don't think our Dept of State will do anything to jeopardize the FOB base in Aruba especially now with the Ruskies entering into drilling agreements with Uncle Hugo.

That ups the ante a bit, IMO.



I agree Anna.  It is all political and ... the tiny island of Aruba is holding the United States of America hostage.

My youngest son's wise Dutch American FIL believes that Aruba's close ties with Hugo Chavez is at the root of both the Netherland and the United States' tolerance in regards to the corrupt Aruban administration.

Hugo Chávez is so dangerious to the security of world. He has a goal which IS NOT hidden ... a goal which will ultimately threaten the security of United States of America. He had a plan is to acquire one small nation at a time ... building up strength throughout the Caribbean. Think about it ... Aruba is the stepping stone from Venezuala to American ... Cuba is a stone throw from the mainland.

The United States administration knows this ...  yet it continues to appease ... tolerate this dictator. This approach only makes what was once the most feared/respected nation on the face of the earth appear weak and ... gives this dictator who is drunk with power more confidence to further his global agenda.

It is a truly sad day when this dictator is allowed to speak before the UN referring to the President of the United States as the "devil" and ... have no fear of retaliation.

If the United States goes down ... so does every appeasing/tolerant democratic nation in the world ... Canada included.

The free world has to wake up ... left-wing dictators as well as Islamic nations are gaining strength through our weaknesses.

“The reality is that we must find peace through strength.”
Ronald Reagan, 1983


Janet

+++++++++++++++

Chavez: Bush 'devil'; U.S. 'on the way down'
POSTED: 1726 GMT (0126 HKT), September 21, 2006


http://edition.cnn.com/2006/WORLD/americas/09/20/chavez.un/index.html


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #793 1/13/09
Post by: Keepthefaith on January 14, 2009, 06:40:53 PM
So what person had the inside knowledge of the cover-up from beginning to end that could possibly have recorded this?Why would they have put their life at risk unless they were possibly gonna be the fall guy? ::MonkeyConfused::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #793 1/13/09
Post by: Keepthefaith on January 14, 2009, 06:42:21 PM
So what person had the inside knowledge of the cover-up from beginning to end that could possibly have recorded this?Why would they have put their life at risk unless they were possibly gonna be the fall guy? ::MonkeyConfused::

Tj Ward,Colombian witnesses.I'm waiting Greta... ::MonkeyDance::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #793 1/13/09
Post by: wreck on January 14, 2009, 06:43:55 PM
So what person had the inside knowledge of the cover-up from beginning to end that could possibly have recorded this?Why would they have put their life at risk unless they were possibly gonna be the fall guy? ::MonkeyConfused::
I still think it was someone "documenting" the cover-up to ensure the security guards would not be railroaded.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #793 1/13/09
Post by: Buckeye on January 14, 2009, 06:54:40 PM
So what person had the inside knowledge of the cover-up from beginning to end that could possibly have recorded this?Why would they have put their life at risk unless they were possibly gonna be the fall guy? ::MonkeyConfused::
I still think it was someone "documenting" the cover-up to ensure the security guards would not be railroaded.

I agree.  They were concerned for their friend, so they started following the "coverup" team.  My guess is that this wasn't the first time one of their own got framed.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #793 1/13/09
Post by: truthseeker2 on January 14, 2009, 07:02:06 PM
So it is believed the fellow who took the Aruba Bay video who had dark legs, actually knew the body was in the plastic he videoed, which could also be a large plastic taken from a trash container witnessed by a Colombian male. Who could also have dark legs.. Natalee's body was supposedly put into plastic and taken away in a white pick up..
 Taken to this culvert and placed there temporary..?
 later taken to another location and somehow eventually put into a crab/fish trap and dropped off the boat into 90 some feet of water..

Then there is various other witnesses and Internet bloggers and lots of thing we have discussed over the last 3.7 years now..
Take a look.. http://s66.photobucket.com/albums/h254/chicagoutfit/?start=all

Then there is Marcos near the end..

A large scale cover up by a government and or organized crime syndicate....


The one thing I have to say about all of this is,..
A famous psychic who lives in my neck of the woods was interviewed within 2 weeks of Natalee disappearing by me and I have it on tape..
She insisted at that time Natalee was in the ocean.. I believed she was in Venezuela.
She has never contacted the family ..Nor has she posted her thoughts on the Internet..
She has stayed silent.
I still have her on tape...  and The F.B.I. contacted her before I did..They wanted to know her opinion.. She also told them Natalee was in the ocean..
 Never said she was in a fish/crab trap and has never been contacted for approximate location of where Natalee may have been placed..
 I remember her words about the people involved.. Very dangerous people/ she sensed drug dealers and murders.. Also her words about how far out...Way Out !
 Also her last words.. Before this is over Many Nations will be involved.
It is all on tape... It is dated..
It appears she was correct.. and she always impressed me as honesty without any hesitation ..
Her name, Annette Martin.
I found it very interesting the fbi called her so quickly.. as she has advised them before.

There were other predictions .. Like this one who felt compelled to contact the family.
 http://www.marybrents.com/missing.htm

But Annette has strick rules on this.. I am just amazed at how accurate she was.
I did contact her and gave her a link to the Persistance web site.. I wonder what she thinks of all of this today..

She did say that the body would not be found..
Oh well.

That is pretty interesting.  Would she mind if you uploaded that to YouTube?  I would like to see it. 


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #793 1/13/09
Post by: Anna on January 14, 2009, 07:07:36 PM
So what person had the inside knowledge of the cover-up from beginning to end that could possibly have recorded this?Why would they have put their life at risk unless they were possibly gonna be the fall guy? ::MonkeyConfused::
I still think it was someone "documenting" the cover-up to ensure the security guards would not be railroaded.


Assuming, of course, the security guards did not agree to be railroaded.  For a price and catch and release deal, of course. 

I know, I know, I am totally cynical after all this time and being jerked around so much.


.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #793 1/13/09
Post by: Anna on January 14, 2009, 07:12:19 PM



.
Nothing is ever what it seems at first glance.

.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #793 1/13/09
Post by: Anna on January 14, 2009, 07:14:25 PM
So what person had the inside knowledge of the cover-up from beginning to end that could possibly have recorded this?Why would they have put their life at risk unless they were possibly gonna be the fall guy? ::MonkeyConfused::
I still think it was someone "documenting" the cover-up to ensure the security guards would not be railroaded.


Or recording the "undoing" of a fabricated crime scene?  Was there a sudden change of plans in the cover up?


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #793 1/13/09
Post by: Keepthefaith on January 14, 2009, 07:19:30 PM
So what person had the inside knowledge of the cover-up from beginning to end that could possibly have recorded this?Why would they have put their life at risk unless they were possibly gonna be the fall guy? ::MonkeyConfused::
I still think it was someone "documenting" the cover-up to ensure the security guards would not be railroaded.


Assuming, of course, the security guards did not agree to be railroaded.  For a price and catch and release deal, of course. 

I know, I know, I am totally cynical after all this time and being jerked around so much.


.

For me.Who else were Joran and Paulus potentially gonna set-up?I don't know.Just throwing random thoughts out there.The Mansur Family record it for political,as well as personal reasons?Who and why? ::MonkeyConfused::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #793 1/13/09
Post by: Tamikosmom on January 14, 2009, 07:21:33 PM
So what person had the inside knowledge of the cover-up from beginning to end that could possibly have recorded this?Why would they have put their life at risk unless they were possibly gonna be the fall guy? ::MonkeyConfused::
I still think it was someone "documenting" the cover-up to ensure the security guards would not be railroaded.


Assuming, of course, the security guards did not agree to be railroaded.  For a price and catch and release deal, of course. 

I know, I know, I am totally cynical after all this time and being jerked around so much.


.

I do not think that the security guards agreed to anything in regards to their detention.  However I believe that some negotiations took place in regards to what Deepak reveal to him while their detainment overlapped by a a few days.

Think about the implication.  Paulus van der Sloot was involved in the Holiday Inn fabrication prior to Jug and Beth arriving on the Island.

An official witness statement from Mickey John has never surfaced.

Janet

_____

Former Aruba Suspect Alleges Plot!
Wednesday, June 29, 2005


MICKEY JOHN, FORMER SUSPECT: ... He (Deepak) said a story being made up about dropping the girl of at a Holiday Inn, was all something being made up. He, and the Dutch guy, and the Dutch guy's father, they sit and made up the story.

VAN SUSTEREN: The father, too?

JOHN: All of them. They made up...

VAN SUSTEREN: Did he specifically say — Deepak specifically say to you the father was part of that?

JOHN: Deepak told me that he and the family sit down and they made up the story.

VAN SUSTEREN: So family and not father?

JOHN: Well, I don't know who the family consists of. But I know the father was involved, according to him.

http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,161044,00.html


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #793 1/13/09
Post by: Edward on January 14, 2009, 07:24:54 PM
truthseeker2
I have hesitated on that audio upload.. f.b.i. asking questions and all.. even though I paid for the interview..
I always felt if Beth or Dave wanted it I would send it to them and even though I have talked with Dave and Robin they have never asked for it..
So I will leave it at that...

It is interesting though I really do agree with that...

When I first went there I was hoping for an approximate location where Natalee was being held.. I was so sure she was alive.. Annette nailed me down in my chair and looked me straight in the eyes..No Way Edward.. Natalee is dead !
I was floored with the reality in her eyes..

Hard headed as I am I continued on my path hoping Annette was wrong and that Natalee was alive and being held by a group such as the FARC ...
 The trap really puts an explanation point on Annette's words.. damn it all



  Tamikosmom,  Your post about Hugo and his intentions is so right on the money...
I thought I was the only one who could see Hugo.. Apparently not. ::MonkeyWink::
He stepped up to the U.N. Podium and said..I can still smell the sulfur as Bush stepped down..
I had to laugh at that one.. Sorry
Also When Bush and Condi went to the Americas summit in Argentina I views Bush and Condi walking behind Hugo like cowardly... Hugo called Condi his little coconut girl, which is a racial slave term. Bush never says a word to Hugo and I always wondered why that is..
 All I can think is Bush used Hugo's corrupt electronic vote-booth software "smartmatic/sequoia" in Florida with Kerry and Hugo is holding it over his head.. Like blackmail ?
I have no idea.. But a good post on your part.. Thank You..



QUOTE
Posted on: Today at 05:54:40 PMPosted by: Buckeye 
Insert Quote
Quote from: wreck on Today at 05:43:55 PM
Quote from: Keepthefaith on Today at 05:40:53 PM
So what person had the inside knowledge of the cover-up from beginning to end that could possibly have recorded this?Why would they have put their life at risk unless they were possibly gonna be the fall guy?

I still think it was someone "documenting" the cover-up to ensure the security guards would not be railroaded.


I agree.  They were concerned for their friend, so they started following the "coverup" team.  My guess is that this wasn't the first time one of their own got framed.
END

I have to agree on all of this..


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #793 1/13/09
Post by: truthseeker2 on January 14, 2009, 07:38:52 PM
Edward,

Do you feel as though Annette's words to you put Natalee further out into the ocean than where the trap was found??  That is what I though you meant in your first post about your conversation with Annette.  Let me know if I read that incorrectly.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #793 1/13/09
Post by: Edward on January 14, 2009, 07:54:49 PM
Edward,

Do you feel as though Annette's words to you put Natalee further out into the ocean than where the trap was found??  That is what I though you meant in your first post about your conversation with Annette.  Let me know if I read that incorrectly.

I did push her on that.. We did not have a map, but she said Way Out !
I said like 5 miles out ? she said like 10 or 15 miles out.. ! Way Out!

Never mentioned Joran or Deepak and in all reality they do not impress me as people I would have fear of.

Most all the murders we have come across in the last few years the bodies have been found on land..The ocean is Not the locals method of disposal.. Rene could have been put in the ocean and so could have Pit Bull ..But they were not ..Nor was marlene on Bonair  and there have been quite a few others in the last 3.7 years..All but 1 or 2 have been found on land..



Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #793 1/13/09
Post by: Blonde on January 14, 2009, 08:00:32 PM
So it is believed the fellow who took the Aruba Bay video who had dark legs, actually knew the body was in the plastic he videoed, which could also be a large plastic taken from a trash container witnessed by a Colombian male. Who could also have dark legs.. Natalee's body was supposedly put into plastic and taken away in a white pick up..
 Taken to this culvert and placed there temporary..?
 later taken to another location and somehow eventually put into a crab/fish trap and dropped off the boat into 90 some feet of water..

Then there is various other witnesses and Internet bloggers and lots of thing we have discussed over the last 3.7 years now..
Take a look.. http://s66.photobucket.com/albums/h254/chicagoutfit/?start=all

Then there is Marcos near the end..

A large scale cover up by a government and or organized crime syndicate....


The one thing I have to say about all of this is,..
A famous psychic who lives in my neck of the woods was interviewed within 2 weeks of Natalee disappearing by me and I have it on tape..
She insisted at that time Natalee was in the ocean.. I believed she was in Venezuela.
She has never contacted the family ..Nor has she posted her thoughts on the Internet..
She has stayed silent.
I still have her on tape...  and The F.B.I. contacted her before I did..They wanted to know her opinion.. She also told them Natalee was in the ocean..
 Never said she was in a fish/crab trap and has never been contacted for approximate location of where Natalee may have been placed..
 I remember her words about the people involved.. Very dangerous people/ she sensed drug dealers and murders.. Also her words about how far out...Way Out !
 Also her last words.. Before this is over Many Nations will be involved.
It is all on tape... It is dated..
It appears she was correct.. and she always impressed me as honesty without any hesitation ..
Her name, Annette Martin.
I found it very interesting the fbi called her so quickly.. as she has advised them before.

There were other predictions .. Like this one who felt compelled to contact the family.
 http://www.marybrents.com/missing.htm

But Annette has strick rules on this.. I am just amazed at how accurate she was.
I did contact her and gave her a link to the Persistance web site.. I wonder what she thinks of all of this today..

She did say that the body would not be found..
Oh well.

IMO I think the guy taking the video was friends of the 2 arrested SG's and he was snooping on his own, to prove their innocence.
I think he just  was covering their butts and saw more then he wanted to see got scared and took off.
Then video #38 witch shows all faces involved got removed.
Rob knows more about this then I do.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #793 1/13/09
Post by: Keepthefaith on January 14, 2009, 08:17:29 PM
Since December 15th, an oil exploration crew from south Louisiana has used sonar equipment to scour Aruba's ocean floor looking for Natalee.Tuesday, Jan 01, 2008 - 11:19 PM Updated: 11:34 PMBy Jennifer Hale

January 7 the ROV dives down to the cage and evidence is gathered

January 17 CAPS puts his first post at SM
January 22, 2008, 01:32:49 AM - Caps posted his theory about what he thinks happened
January 26 Kyle puts a post on his blog about how the Aruba dive team are so trustworthy and have become good friends
January 27 The Aruba Coast Guard boarded the Persistence for a friendly visit at 0810 hrs this morning. For an hour we shared coffee, traded T-shirts, swapped stories, and showed them our progress.

Jan. 21 - 10 days before the Ranger Rover confession Kyle met downtown in public with Mos
(date tapes were released, Jan. 31 st is when Beth saw them with DeVries)

Jan 27, 2008 - The Aruba Coast Guard boarded the Persistence for a friendly visit at 0810 hrs this morning.  Sun 27-Jan 2355 hrs. "The possibility exists that they revisited the cage and did a site sweep, sampling more items including human remains around the 12th of Jan when I witnessed the Dutch Coast Guard on the site two days in a row.

January 31, 2008 - CAPS emails Dave Holloway

February 01, 2008, 09:52:13 PM CAPS posts:
Montana Apartments
http://scaredmonkeys.net/index.php?topic=1952.1620

February 01, 2008, 10:26:49 PM
CAPS POSTS: The Montana Park Apartment is where all started..The Sex etc...
http://scaredmonkeys.net/index.php?topic=1952.1620

February 9, 2008 - Jossy Mansur: A man claims he found a telephone behind the lighthouse in 2005; it was broken; he fixed it and dialed a person with the phone, so his story goes. The person apparently answered and said that that number belonged to Paulus Van der Sloot. The man is now giving testimony to the police. Late, but still important enough to be taken into consideration.

Caps emails Dave: I have spoken to John and he is in contact with MOS.

Feb 26CAPS posted: Reply #2727 on: February 26, 2008, 09:29:40 AM
The pond in question (MOKO) is right out near the Whitehouse Apartment.
http://scaredmonkeys.net/index.php?topic=1952.2720

CAPS posted: Reply #2729 on: February 26, 2008, 10:36:09 AM
Look for Noord and look for Moko.
http://scaredmonkeys.net/index.php?topic=1952.2720

Find Aruba. Look for Noord. Look for Montaña. Look for Moko
CAPS posted:  Reply #7 on: April 15, 2008, 09:24:02 AM »
they where located in Moko and where in the massages bussines
now lets look at the addess to the Dutch Apartmnts

Posted 2nd week of FEB: KYLE:  The FBI did not comment on the remains, but rather the fabric sample.
scaredmonkeys.net/index.php?topic=2705.700

Feb 17th through the 23  - Kyle Kingman based on his agreement with Tim Tehran and Louis Schafer flew to the east coast to meet with Executives of the networks.
                            for the purpose of selling the ROV/VIDEOS of the trap/cage.
http://scaredmonkeys.net/index.php?topic=2654.msg357222#msg357222

Kyle said: "The producer from 20/20 asked me if I saw the badges or credentials of the police officers. I had a total DEAR LORD moment, but recalled seeing the three divers several times with other police in uniform. Also the leader of the three I later saw with a badge.

Kyle said: "Dave was involved with the search until the 30th of Dec from an information-only level. I don't know if he knows anything about the blue denim-like fabric and have no reason to suspect that he does. I would say he knows as much as Beth, perhaps slightly more. It's time Beth knows what the truth is about that trap"

Kyle said: "Right before the Dateline special aired Tim and Louis asked if I could go to ABC to try to sell the footage in an attempt to recoup some of the money invested in the search efforts"
Everything remained in my possesion.

The ROV/Video images, never given to the family or FBI.

Feb. 22, 2008Kyle posted at BFN: This program was originally pitched by NBC to Tim Miller to be a docuentary about TES and turned into a documenary about the Search for Natalee Holloway's body.  It seems NBC shamelessly used Tim Miller to get on board the Persistence during the search

Feb. 22, 2008 = NBC Dateline special.  http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/23261368/

Reply #494 on: February 26, 2008, 08:55:26 PM »
Bad news on the search.  Persistence has completed the underwater survey/grid.  Have identified 100+ objects and trying to narrow the list.  However, they are totally out of money.  If they can't come up with donations within a week or 10 days they will have to go home.
Dave Holloway has been talking to various officials to help chip in.

Without contributions Persistence is coming home.
http://scaredmonkeys.net/index.php?topic=2641.480

KYLE posts that when the crew from Persistence was searching the pond, AMIGO took pictures, they didn't call the press and the polis knew and Amigo knew prior to the pond search. Someone leaked.

Kyle: "This is what I'm trying to figure out now. I need to know the leak! I believe Caps is only one step away from DirtyHand."

Caps said: "my uncle is a Lawyer and He always talk abaout to have Roll duty."
Caps said his brother told him what Mos was upset about before Mos made any statements publically

FEB 28th -  the Persistence sudden departure and asking for money to continue the search.

February 29KYLE TO RED: "Let me make myself perfectly clear.  Your bitterness towards me is neither my fault nor my concern.  If what you said is true and Tim Miller said something making you feel entitled to be on board this boat at some point, he was mistaken.  It was not his decision, nor mine"

March 1 - RV Persistence announced it is leaving Aruba http://blogsfornatalee.com/forum/index.php?topic=8398.0
March 3 - John meets with Caps
March 3 - Kyle learns that the screenshots he sent to the FBI - the FBI sent to Dave and Dave's wife, Robin posted them on the internet.
March 3 - LegalLEx posts at BFN: "I think an immediate agenda many of us have taken on is... to continue... trying to find significant funding/donations... to finish the search... at least of those 150 (or so) targets that may yield Natalee and... maybe... evidence.
<snip>
Since John does not deal with the financing portion, (TES and Louis do),


April 7 KYle said: I'm uncertain as to whom Caps has been talking about. This witness wouldn't talk to police and would only talk to us at first through his lawyer.







BUMP ::MonkeyCool::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #793 1/13/09
Post by: bleachedblack on January 14, 2009, 08:20:23 PM
Edward,

Do you feel as though Annette's words to you put Natalee further out into the ocean than where the trap was found??  That is what I though you meant in your first post about your conversation with Annette.  Let me know if I read that incorrectly.

I did push her on that.. We did not have a map, but she said Way Out !
I said like 5 miles out ? she said like 10 or 15 miles out.. ! Way Out!

Never mentioned Joran or Deepak and in all reality they do not impress me as people I would have fear of.

Most all the murders we have come across in the last few years the bodies have been found on land..The ocean is Not the locals method of disposal.. Rene could have been put in the ocean and so could have Pit Bull ..But they were not ..Nor was marlene on Bonair  and there have been quite a few others in the last 3.7 years..All but 1 or 2 have been found on land..



IMO the 2 murders you mention, both Rene and Pitbull, were killed in such a
way as to be "over kill" and the main reason-though some will disagree- for doing this , is to send a message. This message value would have been lost if the body was simply thrown in the sea.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #793 1/13/09
Post by: truthseeker2 on January 14, 2009, 08:22:00 PM
Edward,

Do you feel as though Annette's words to you put Natalee further out into the ocean than where the trap was found??  That is what I though you meant in your first post about your conversation with Annette.  Let me know if I read that incorrectly.

I did push her on that.. We did not have a map, but she said Way Out !
I said like 5 miles out ? she said like 10 or 15 miles out.. ! Way Out!

Never mentioned Joran or Deepak and in all reality they do not impress me as people I would have fear of.

Most all the murders we have come across in the last few years the bodies have been found on land..The ocean is Not the locals method of disposal.. Rene could have been put in the ocean and so could have Pit Bull ..But they were not ..Nor was marlene on Bonair  and there have been quite a few others in the last 3.7 years..All but 1 or 2 have been found on land..



Another interesting point.  Is that because it is more difficult than we realize to move a body off of the island? 


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #793 1/13/09
Post by: COLOMBO on January 14, 2009, 08:39:14 PM
http://www.iht.com/articles/2009/01/14/america/venez.php


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #793 1/13/09
Post by: wreck on January 14, 2009, 09:21:14 PM
So it is believed the fellow who took the Aruba Bay video who had dark legs, actually knew the body was in the plastic he videoed, which could also be a large plastic taken from a trash container witnessed by a Colombian male. Who could also have dark legs.. Natalee's body was supposedly put into plastic and taken away in a white pick up..
 Taken to this culvert and placed there temporary..?
 later taken to another location and somehow eventually put into a crab/fish trap and dropped off the boat into 90 some feet of water..

Then there is various other witnesses and Internet bloggers and lots of thing we have discussed over the last 3.7 years now..
Take a look.. http://s66.photobucket.com/albums/h254/chicagoutfit/?start=all

Then there is Marcos near the end..

A large scale cover up by a government and or organized crime syndicate....


The one thing I have to say about all of this is,..
A famous psychic who lives in my neck of the woods was interviewed within 2 weeks of Natalee disappearing by me and I have it on tape..
She insisted at that time Natalee was in the ocean.. I believed she was in Venezuela.
She has never contacted the family ..Nor has she posted her thoughts on the Internet..
She has stayed silent.
I still have her on tape...  and The F.B.I. contacted her before I did..They wanted to know her opinion.. She also told them Natalee was in the ocean..
 Never said she was in a fish/crab trap and has never been contacted for approximate location of where Natalee may have been placed..
 I remember her words about the people involved.. Very dangerous people/ she sensed drug dealers and murders.. Also her words about how far out...Way Out !
 Also her last words.. Before this is over Many Nations will be involved.
It is all on tape... It is dated..
It appears she was correct.. and she always impressed me as honesty without any hesitation ..
Her name, Annette Martin.
I found it very interesting the fbi called her so quickly.. as she has advised them before.

There were other predictions .. Like this one who felt compelled to contact the family.
 http://www.marybrents.com/missing.htm

But Annette has strick rules on this.. I am just amazed at how accurate she was.
I did contact her and gave her a link to the Persistance web site.. I wonder what she thinks of all of this today..

She did say that the body would not be found..
Oh well.

IMO I think the guy taking the video was friends of the 2 arrested SG's and he was snooping on his own, to prove their innocence.
I think he just  was covering their butts and saw more then he wanted to see got scared and took off.
Then video #38 witch shows all faces involved got removed.
Rob knows more about this then I do.

Who has actually seen video #38?


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #793 1/13/09
Post by: texasmom on January 14, 2009, 09:39:19 PM
http://www.amigoe.com/artman/publish/artikel_51497.php

Google translation:

Research on dead by dengue
14 Jan, 2009, 15:46 (GMT -04:00)

  Email this article
  Print this article
 
ORANGE CITY - Department of Health has issued an urgent press conference Tuesday called for an "update" to have dengue, or dengue. The department has done this in response to the hundreds of calls that come in within its Health, after the media reported was a 53-year-old woman from dengue Casibari which would be deceased.

 
Trevor of Gellecum, Director of Public Health
According to Trevor Gellecum, Director of Health, it is still not clear that this woman is actually dengue is deceased. "First, there are certain tests are performed and it can take three weeks before the result has been," says Van Gellecum. "These tests should be in a laboratory carried out abroad."

According to Wilmer Salazar, microbiologist at Health, the woman had a fever at the weekend, but on Monday they all felt better and she went to her work. "Later that day she was taken to hospital in shock. At night she is deceased, "said Salazar. "Until now there is no confirmed diagnosis of the cause of death, but it is suspected that it was dengue. Today, an autopsy performed, the study abroad may take place. "

Maribel Tromp, management at the department of epidemiology and research of the Infectious Disease Food Service (DBZ) has indicated that so far 612 suspected cases of dengue have been registered. "Of these 218 cases confirmed as positive by the laboratory, and 394 are still under investigation, reports Tromp. "This does not mean that they are negative."

From the moment the news of a potentially fatal dengue victim arose late Charline Koolma, director of the Yellow Fever Muskieten Fight (GKMB) know that they are overwhelmed with calls from people reporting on possible family dengue reported or who want information about the disease. "It is good that we now call, but it had also previously been possible. This kind of extreme cases, can be avoided ", according Koolman.

"From November last year, the GKMB made several visits to check on breeding, and syringes. Often the residents are not home and then left behind a letter with a request to make contact with the GKMB for the disclosure of important information for us. But there is never called back until something bad happens and it is often too late. "
The more information and reports the GKMB gets, the better the service and the DBZ can do their work, said Tromp. Finally, all speakers called on the population and general practitioners to join forces for the multiplication of denguemug Aedes Aegypti beings. Health management is that the only way to prevent infection with dengue.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #793 1/13/09
Post by: Tamikosmom on January 14, 2009, 10:15:47 PM
Good Night klaasend, ospainter, texasmom and San.

I am done.

Janet
7:15 PM PT


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #793 1/13/09
Post by: ospainter on January 14, 2009, 10:32:45 PM
Nite Janet

Just hanging in the rafters..Sorry don't have anything to add to the discussion.

OS


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #793 1/13/09
Post by: klaasend on January 14, 2009, 10:37:39 PM
Good Night klaasend, ospainter, texasmom and San.

I am done.

Janet
7:15 PM PT

Nite Janet


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #793 1/13/09
Post by: texasmom on January 14, 2009, 10:43:58 PM
Good Night klaasend, ospainter, texasmom and San.

I am done.

Janet
7:15 PM PT

Goodnight Janet.   ::MonkeyCool::

 


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #793 1/13/09
Post by: Edward on January 15, 2009, 01:21:54 AM
Edward,

Do you feel as though Annette's words to you put Natalee further out into the ocean than where the trap was found??  That is what I though you meant in your first post about your conversation with Annette.  Let me know if I read that incorrectly.

I did push her on that.. We did not have a map, but she said Way Out !
I said like 5 miles out ? she said like 10 or 15 miles out.. ! Way Out!

Never mentioned Joran or Deepak and in all reality they do not impress me as people I would have fear of.

Most all the murders we have come across in the last few years the bodies have been found on land..The ocean is Not the locals method of disposal.. Rene could have been put in the ocean and so could have Pit Bull ..But they were not ..Nor was marlene on Bonair  and there have been quite a few others in the last 3.7 years..All but 1 or 2 have been found on land..



Another interesting point.  Is that because it is more difficult than we realize to move a body off of the island? 


1.This is the way to make sure you do not have a body.. No body No crime.
2.THEY set up Rene's wife to take the Fall.
3.They torture PitBull.. Tied his hands to a pole and cut his legs off, then proceeded to pull his intestines out .. torture. 3 people go to prison for various terms on this crime, not one over 6 years. They offered no defense to there actions..

Was Natalee kept alive for a time ? Very possible, and any and all of those witnesses are now deceased..
Who would be willing to do that ?
Where was she kept ?

There was talk about basements.. I found a contractor that builds basements in Aruba
Apparently the rich and famous use them for wine storage.. A cool area.

The only one who comes to mind that has a personality to do this I have already mentioned, I bet he owns a basement.
 
Why has Joran taken the fall on this ? Why has Paulus ?
Joran probably works for the syndicate and Paulus is probably linked to the syndicate through bribe and or payoff for past things that have now turned into a threat if he says anything.



Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #793 1/13/09
Post by: texasmom on January 15, 2009, 01:42:16 AM
(http://i21.photobucket.com/albums/b258/texasmom55/Natalee/Natalee66544.jpg)

JUSTICE FOR NATALEE!!!!


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #793 1/13/09
Post by: iris44 on January 15, 2009, 03:59:57 AM
Edward,

Do you feel as though Annette's words to you put Natalee further out into the ocean than where the trap was found??  That is what I though you meant in your first post about your conversation with Annette.  Let me know if I read that incorrectly.

I did push her on that.. We did not have a map, but she said Way Out !
I said like 5 miles out ? she said like 10 or 15 miles out.. ! Way Out!

Never mentioned Joran or Deepak and in all reality they do not impress me as people I would have fear of.

Most all the murders we have come across in the last few years the bodies have been found on land..The ocean is Not the locals method of disposal.. Rene could have been put in the ocean and so could have Pit Bull ..But they were not ..Nor was marlene on Bonair  and there have been quite a few others in the last 3.7 years..All but 1 or 2 have been found on land..



Another interesting point.  Is that because it is more difficult than we realize to move a body off of the island? 


1.This is the way to make sure you do not have a body.. No body No crime.
2.THEY set up Rene's wife to take the Fall.
3.They torture PitBull.. Tied his hands to a pole and cut his legs off, then proceeded to pull his intestines out .. torture. 3 people go to prison for various terms on this crime, not one over 6 years. They offered no defense to there actions..

Was Natalee kept alive for a time ? Very possible, and any and all of those witnesses are now deceased..
Who would be willing to do that ?
Where was she kept ?

There was talk about basements.. I found a contractor that builds basements in Aruba
Apparently the rich and famous use them for wine storage.. A cool area.

The only one who comes to mind that has a personality to do this I have already mentioned, I bet he owns a basement.
 
Why has Joran taken the fall on this ? Why has Paulus ?
Joran probably works for the syndicate and Paulus is probably linked to the syndicate through bribe and or payoff for past things that have now turned into a threat if he says anything.



I believe Paulus and/or Joran must have mob ties proven by the fact that Tacopino was defending Joran.  There is no other explanation.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #793 1/13/09
Post by: MumInOhio on January 15, 2009, 04:27:53 AM
Edward,

Do you feel as though Annette's words to you put Natalee further out into the ocean than where the trap was found??  That is what I though you meant in your first post about your conversation with Annette.  Let me know if I read that incorrectly.

I did push her on that.. We did not have a map, but she said Way Out !
I said like 5 miles out ? she said like 10 or 15 miles out.. ! Way Out!

Never mentioned Joran or Deepak and in all reality they do not impress me as people I would have fear of.

Most all the murders we have come across in the last few years the bodies have been found on land..The ocean is Not the locals method of disposal.. Rene could have been put in the ocean and so could have Pit Bull ..But they were not ..Nor was marlene on Bonair  and there have been quite a few others in the last 3.7 years..All but 1 or 2 have been found on land..



Another interesting point.  Is that because it is more difficult than we realize to move a body off of the island? 


1.This is the way to make sure you do not have a body.. No body No crime.
2.THEY set up Rene's wife to take the Fall.
3.They torture PitBull.. Tied his hands to a pole and cut his legs off, then proceeded to pull his intestines out .. torture. 3 people go to prison for various terms on this crime, not one over 6 years. They offered no defense to there actions..

Was Natalee kept alive for a time ? Very possible, and any and all of those witnesses are now deceased..
Who would be willing to do that ?
Where was she kept ?

There was talk about basements.. I found a contractor that builds basements in Aruba
Apparently the rich and famous use them for wine storage.. A cool area.

The only one who comes to mind that has a personality to do this I have already mentioned, I bet he owns a basement.
 
Why has Joran taken the fall on this ? Why has Paulus ?
Joran probably works for the syndicate and Paulus is probably linked to the syndicate through bribe and or payoff for past things that have now turned into a threat if he says anything.



I believe Paulus and/or Joran must have mob ties proven by the fact that Tacopino was defending Joran.  There is no other explanation.

There is another explanation. The alternative is even more frightening. They destroy people and lives. These are powerful people. And I for one am not going to pursue it any further.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #793 1/13/09
Post by: Cageman on January 15, 2009, 04:44:49 AM

Most all the murders we have come across in the last few years the bodies have been found on land..The ocean is Not the locals method of disposal.. Rene could have been put in the ocean and so could have Pit Bull ..But they were not ..Nor was marlene on Bonair  and there have been quite a few others in the last 3.7 years..All but 1 or 2 have been found on land..

marlene = Marlies


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #793 1/13/09
Post by: Cageman on January 15, 2009, 04:46:48 AM
I'm sorry. Something went wrong in my previous reaction. It wasn't Edward saying "marlene = Marlies" but it was me.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #793 1/13/09
Post by: MumInOhio on January 15, 2009, 04:51:19 AM
Good Morning Cageman and Johan.

I knew what you meant Cageman. You and your Family continue to be in my Prayers.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #793 1/13/09
Post by: bastibro on January 15, 2009, 04:53:41 AM
I'm sorry. Something went wrong in my previous reaction. It wasn't Edward saying "marlene = Marlies" but it was me.

Yep, Goodmorning Jan Willem!


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #793 1/13/09
Post by: MumInOhio on January 15, 2009, 05:02:54 AM
I'm sorry. Something went wrong in my previous reaction. It wasn't Edward saying "marlene = Marlies" but it was me.

Yep, Goodmorning Jan Willem!

Sorry Bastibro...I didn't see you there...Good Morning!

Have a great day!


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #793 1/13/09
Post by: Blonde on January 15, 2009, 08:41:47 AM
So it is believed the fellow who took the Aruba Bay video who had dark legs, actually knew the body was in the plastic he videoed, which could also be a large plastic taken from a trash container witnessed by a Colombian male. Who could also have dark legs.. Natalee's body was supposedly put into plastic and taken away in a white pick up..
 Taken to this culvert and placed there temporary..?
 later taken to another location and somehow eventually put into a crab/fish trap and dropped off the boat into 90 some feet of water..

Then there is various other witnesses and Internet bloggers and lots of thing we have discussed over the last 3.7 years now..
Take a look.. http://s66.photobucket.com/albums/h254/chicagoutfit/?start=all

Then there is Marcos near the end..

A large scale cover up by a government and or organized crime syndicate....


The one thing I have to say about all of this is,..
A famous psychic who lives in my neck of the woods was interviewed within 2 weeks of Natalee disappearing by me and I have it on tape..
She insisted at that time Natalee was in the ocean.. I believed she was in Venezuela.
She has never contacted the family ..Nor has she posted her thoughts on the Internet..
She has stayed silent.
I still have her on tape...  and The F.B.I. contacted her before I did..They wanted to know her opinion.. She also told them Natalee was in the ocean..
 Never said she was in a fish/crab trap and has never been contacted for approximate location of where Natalee may have been placed..
 I remember her words about the people involved.. Very dangerous people/ she sensed drug dealers and murders.. Also her words about how far out...Way Out !
 Also her last words.. Before this is over Many Nations will be involved.
It is all on tape... It is dated..
It appears she was correct.. and she always impressed me as honesty without any hesitation ..
Her name, Annette Martin.
I found it very interesting the fbi called her so quickly.. as she has advised them before.

There were other predictions .. Like this one who felt compelled to contact the family.
 http://www.marybrents.com/missing.htm

But Annette has strick rules on this.. I am just amazed at how accurate she was.
I did contact her and gave her a link to the Persistance web site.. I wonder what she thinks of all of this today..

She did say that the body would not be found..
Oh well.

IMO I think the guy taking the video was friends of the 2 arrested SG's and he was snooping on his own, to prove their innocence.
I think he just  was covering their butts and saw more then he wanted to see got scared and took off.
Then video #38 witch shows all faces involved got removed.
Rob knows more about this then I do.

Who has actually seen video #38?

I think Rob did?
It was on then taken off I think.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #793 1/13/09
Post by: Tamikosmom on January 15, 2009, 09:12:06 AM
Joran van der Sloot's age implies he should never have been allowed on the premises of the Excelsior Casino.  He should never have been allowed on the premises of Carlos and Charlies'.  He should never have been allowed on the premises of the Radisson.  He should never have been allowed on the premises of the Wyndham.  Yet he was not only given access to these establishments ... given access to unsuspecting young ladies ... he was allowed to drink alcohol and gamble.

Was Joran a participant in that underground economy?

Janet

++++++


'Rita Cosby Live & Direct' for April 3
updated 8:24 a.m. PT, Tues., April. 4, 2006


JOHN Q. KELLY, HOLLOWAY FAMILY ATTORNEY: Well, if you look at the surveillance video footage, it appears that he’s the one sitting directly next to her and tries to engage her in conversation a couple of times.  And it’s sort of ironic that it’s his father who brought his underage son to a casino and left him there after he left, with access to his line of credit, to put this unfortunate chain of events in process.

You know, if Joran had never been there, not been allowed in there, because he’s underage and wasn’t accompanied by his father, the whole rest of the night wouldn’t have happened.

COSBY: You know, and, John, also, why would that be a significant—why is that in conflict to something else we’ve heard maybe from Paulus before?

KELLY: Well, he’s just claiming that, you know, he’s kept an eye on his son, you know, he’s kept him on a short leash, and, you know, his son is very well-behaved. And it turns out that he’s, you know, got him at casinos. If you’re under 18, you’re not legally even allowed in casinos, so his son was breaking the law with him enabling it.

http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/12150698/


Jossy Mansur
DANA PRETZER
July 23, 2007


Dana: One thing that makes my listeners scratch their heads so to speak and wonder, myself included and we'll talk about it again, is the fact of the underage drinking and gambling that had been going on admittedly by young van der Sloot.  Was there ever any discussion or has there ever been any discussion at least of filing some charges as far as that goes?

Jossy:  No, there hasn't been any of that. The authorities have just (inaudible) it aside, they haven't paid any attention to it then and they're not paying any attention to it now and over the past 26 months.    I haven't seen anything in the direction of trying to make some kind of statement that this is not (inaudiable) at least make some sort of a statement that this is not (inaubible) because it is a known fact that as an underage he wasn't supposed to be in the casino, much less in the company of his father. He was there, there are video tapes to prove that and still the authorities haven't done anything with regard to that specific case.

http://scaredmonkeysradio.com/2007/07/23/the-dana-pretzer-show-monday-july-23rd-2007-special-guests-larry-sinclair-jossy-mansur-ladonna-meredith-attorney-jay-paul-deratany/


Joran van der Sloot
Suspect Statement
June 9, 2005


After that we drove straight to Carlos & Charlies. Deepak was the driver but I cannot remember now who was sitting beside him. I do not remember now if it was Satish or me. I estimate that we arrived at Carlos & Charlies between 00.15 and 00.30 hours. Deepak parked his car on the parking lot behind Carlos & Charlies and after that we walked into the building of Carlos & Charlies. I don't have to pay because I have a VIP pass. With my VIP pass Deepak and Satish were also allowed in.

To your question as to who gave me the VIP pass to Carlos & Charlies, I answer you that I got it through the office of Carlos & Charlies. I do not remember with the help of who I got the VIP pass. I got to Carlos & Charlies about one to three times a week.


Beth Holloway
LOVING NATALEE

Page 39:
  Following our brief conversation, we all walk immediately to the fron desk to ask about someone named Joran who is staying in the hotel and plays in the casino here.  The Holiday Inn night manager, Brenda, knows him by name.  "Oh! yes ... yes ... Joran.  He gambles in the Excelsior Casino here.  He likes to prey on young female tourists.  Especially the blonds.   He is tall.  Good-looking boy.  Like a Dutch marine."   My mouth drops wide open.  "Where is he from?" I ask her.  She replies.  "He lives in Aruba."  I stutter.  "He's ... he's not a tourist just here for the summer?"  "Non, non," she says.

It takes a few moments to absorb this information.  The supposed tourist who befriended some of Natalee's classmates and who told them he was staying at their hotel lied tothem.  He isn't a tourist.  He isn't staying here.


Deepak Kalpoe
Suspect Statement
June 13, 2005


Andre asked me to come inside. I did go inside. I did not play, but did look at the cards of Joran and Guido.

At some given moment in time a tourist who was sitting at Joran's table got angry. The tourist thought that we were looking at the cards of other players and signaling/deciding for Joran when he should play or not. It lead to a disagreement between Joran and the tourist. The manager of the Radisson Casino came over and everything calmed down. I drank about four "whisky coke" gedronken in the Radisson Casino.  I now that Joran drank more because the waiters were constantly bringing him drinks.   I am not sure .what he was drinking. His drinks were of a yellow colour. I think it was “whisky soda" or 'Whisky water".


Aruba Suspects Accused of Taking Sex Photos of Another Girl
Thursday, September 01, 2005


The Kalpoe brothers were released July 4 and rearrested last week with a friend of the three young men, Freddy Alexander Zedan-Arambatzis (search), 21.
 
Zedan-Arambatzis, who is not suspected of involvement in the Holloway case, is accused of taking photos of a minor female in "tempting poses" and of showing the photos to other people, said his lawyer, Diana Emerencia. He is also suspected of having unspecified "physical contact" with the girl, she said.

The Kalpoe brothers and van der Sloot are also suspected of involvement in the incident, which allegedly occurred before Holloway disappeared, Emerencia said.

http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,168233,00.html


'Scarborough Country' for August 26
updated 12:49 p.m. PT, Mon., Aug. 29, 2005


JOSSY MANSUR, EDITOR, “DIARIO”:  It definitely smells that way.  You know, if you take the prosecution‘s statement at its face, we are talking on a whole new level, the charges here.  We are talking about drugs.  We are talking about rape and we are talking about rape of many different people.  There are four guys now in custody, four best friends.  What does that tell you?
 
MANSUR:  Well, what it tells me is that, really, these four guys are friends.  They belong to the same group, these party boys that go out and prey on young, unsuspected girls or other kinds of girls also that are out to have a good time, not suspecting what they‘re in for with these predators around.

And they are—they not only appear in photographs together, but I understand that Freddy lives very near to the Joran house.  So, there is a bond between them.  There is a group that they call themselves the pimps, in which all of these participate.

http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/9119491/


'The Abrams Report' for August 4
updated 8:37 a.m. PT, Fri., Aug. 5, 2005


TWITTY:  You know it's a pretty long scenario; we have a lot of details.  You know the main thing to sum it up is you know Joran, how he entered this establishment.  I believe that you know if you enter on the right side, you have to have a valid I.D.  If you enter Carlos N' Charlie's on the left side, you must have some type of—I don't know if it's a VIP pass or what to enter, but Joran enters the establishment on the left side, approaches these groups of tourists. 

You know it's interesting how he is able to try to work his way in and connect and establish himself in that—in Carlos N' Charlie's, was walking her around and these other tourists and was able to point out Satish and Deepak Kalpoe.  They were sitting ironically in the same corner, the same stools that they were seated at in the picture that's been all over international media, so that must be their spot that they wait while Joran is working.

http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/8838598
 

Deepak Kalpoe
Suspect Statement
June 10, 2005


To your question as to what role Joran plays in our circle of friends, I can state the following. He has no real role. We are all the same.

To your question as to where we take the girls we pick up, I can state the following. Sometimes the girls stay at "Carlos & Charlies" or sometimes we take them to their hotel.

To your question was to what exactly happens when we have picked up the girls, I can state the following. Just kissing and dancing.

To your question whether sexual intercourse has happened, I can state the following. Yes, it has happened.

To your question whether it ever happened that all of us, so in one room, had sexual intercourse, I can state the following. It has happened.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #793 1/13/09
Post by: truthseeker2 on January 15, 2009, 10:59:18 AM

1.This is the way to make sure you do not have a body.. No body No crime.
2.THEY set up Rene's wife to take the Fall.
3.They torture PitBull.. Tied his hands to a pole and cut his legs off, then proceeded to pull his intestines out .. torture. 3 people go to prison for various terms on this crime, not one over 6 years. They offered no defense to there actions..

Was Natalee kept alive for a time ? Very possible, and any and all of those witnesses are now deceased..
Who would be willing to do that ?
Where was she kept ?

There was talk about basements.. I found a contractor that builds basements in Aruba
Apparently the rich and famous use them for wine storage.. A cool area.

The only one who comes to mind that has a personality to do this I have already mentioned, I bet he owns a basement.
 
Why has Joran taken the fall on this ? Why has Paulus ?
Joran probably works for the syndicate and Paulus is probably linked to the syndicate through bribe and or payoff for past things that have now turned into a threat if he says anything.



I see where your are with this and cannot agree or disagree.  However, I can accept it all as a possibility.

A few things come to mind when considering all that you allude to:

1. "No body, no crime".  The 'perfect' disposal or there was no death, therefore no body?

2. Can Rene's death be connected factually?  Many have suspected so, but we cannot prove it.  More work to do.

3. Pitbull is another death we cannot tie back factually, but have suspected is connected.  More work to do.

4. If Natalee was kept alive for a while...Why?  Many have considered the human trafficking angle...without a verifiable confession or body...I suppose it's remains out there as a possible motive.  If untrue, it helps mask the truth if never disproven.  More work to do.

5. If she was kept alive for a while, but eventually lost her life...then when did that happen?  Days, weeks, months?  And now possibly years?  Considering those options, if within days it probably all took place on Aruba.  The other options leave open the opportunity for her to be removed from the island in some manner before she lost her life.

As for the who would/could do these things?  Good question.  In considering the 'history' of who runs things on Aruba the Mansur name has always been out front.  But I do not see a history of this type of thing with that family.  If they did things like this in the past...they were pretty good at it as I see no suspicion thrown their way with any other missing people.  Nothing.   Suspicions of drug trafficking, money laundering and illegal tobacco transactions...yes, that is all out there.  But I don't see the Mansurs murdering people. 

So who is taking control of Aruba?  Who is working with Aruban politicians so as to have this level of legal protection from crime investigations and prosecutions?  We all know Paulus has connections to the judicial system, but I still cannot believe the politicians in Aruba are covering this thing up just for him and his son.  Not to mention, if this was an accident or a drug-overdose (self-inflicted or not) Natalee could not dispute anything that was said about the circumstances.  Those guys could have 'hummed any tune' and with a body to send back home along with their 'song' this would have been over.  Not that the truth would have been told...but left in the hands of the judicial system on Aruba these guys would have probably already been let out of prison by now, if convicted of anything at all.

But...

More work to do!



Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #793 1/13/09
Post by: Edward on January 15, 2009, 12:24:42 PM
Sorry for the name misspelling on Marlies..

As far as proving Rene or Pitbull ..I doubt that can be done..

You can get close when you realize Deepak ran from his car into the bar called chooseaname for just a second..Pitbull was a bouncer there.. The first person you will meet on entry is the bouncer..
 So that is about as close as we can get to putting PitBull in this.. Plus THEY have already torched the place..
 Pitbull was not named in court documents as one of the employees of the M known as The Boss.
So no connection there.

THEY know e have absolutely nothing... and that is where it stands and only organizations like Interpol and the F.B.I. can take it further.. But the Dutch have there own form of a F.B.I. and they have been of no assistance in getting to the truth..
jmho



Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #793 1/13/09
Post by: Magnolia on January 15, 2009, 12:34:15 PM
I can't get mind off of CapsLockWizzard.
Since I am not in the know or connected, I have no idea who he is.
I am not sure it even matters who he is.
It does concern me who would employ him to spread misinformation,
keep people searching to worthless ends and invent a witness.
Who sent Caps here to create the diversion?


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #793 1/13/09
Post by: Keepthefaith on January 15, 2009, 12:39:20 PM
I can't get mind off of CapsLockWizzard.
Since I am not in the know or connected, I have no idea who he is.
I am not sure it even matters who he is.
It does concern me who would employ him to spread misinformation,
keep people searching to worthless ends and invent a witness.
Who sent Caps here to create the diversion?

Great question Magnolia!From what i understand CapsLockWizard is connected to Clyde Burke who is ALE.Why would anyone trust Caps?Correct me if i'm wrong Monkey's!


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #793 1/13/09
Post by: Edward on January 15, 2009, 12:41:58 PM
Well anyways I would like to support Kermits efforts to put pressure on..But onto whom ?
As I see it we have some extremely rich evil people who have conspired together. Anyone who seems to be of any threat has been eliminated. John S. appears to have made all his money for his efforts in the stock sales of his companies shares..
This is a big business move..  A way of funding somebodies efforts for a job well done.
He found the fish trap and you see today that Hugo is after the very same ocean floor that John has mapped out.. With that mapped out floor oil platforms can be pre built for any area determined to have a drill able spot.
 It is probably WHY we now see Hugo chum up with American oil and Dutch oil companies..
The politics are very think here..
Natalee is a victim of far more then just 3 boys after a little drug and rape session in my humble opinion.



Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #793 1/13/09
Post by: Tamikosmom on January 15, 2009, 01:04:42 PM
I can't get mind off of CapsLockWizzard.
Since I am not in the know or connected, I have no idea who he is.
I am not sure it even matters who he is.
It does concern me who would employ him to spread misinformation,
keep people searching to worthless ends and invent a witness.
Who sent Caps here to create the diversion?

I believe that CAPS may be Mark Purcell or somebody closely associated with Mark Purcell.  When you consider CAPS post which undermines Beth and addresses Julia Renfro ... Mark Purcell's very good friend.  Then when you consider his association with the Marriott.

If Mark Purcell is involved ... then I believe that the AHATA was behind the diversion.

Janet

++++++


CapsLockWizard
Re: SHANGO/SIMIAN - who are they and what did they know? #2
« Reply #609 on: April 01, 2008, 03:15:49 AM »


my first question this morning around 9:30 was:

Why would beth lie about her being a virgin and who run with the story was fox news. where did they got the news from? I will answer Julia.

Why why would I lhype up something that was not true and now i need some one to run with it. that can colorabrorate and sustain my lie. My friend. who walk with me. both know it is not the true and that makes it like we say in Logic world,  NOT = NOT and that makes it a logic sense.

it can not be OR and can not be AND OR logic. do not compute.

http://scaredmonkeys.net/index.php?topic=2733.msg369749#msg369749



Another interesting issue of note here.  This from Silvetti's post at BFN:

The important thing is to raise funds. It will require corporate support as well as private donations. Dave and Beth have been doing a great job getting the word out and while I was on the island, Dave put me in contact with the head of the Hotel Association who is working on raising a sizeable amount.
-----------

RIGHT!

Because AHATA was oh so helpful in finding Natalee right from the beginning?  Would that be those same folks from the Tourism Industry who were "moved" to the Justice Dept to "help solve this case"?

The same people who set out within the first week to besmirch Natalee and state she was a run away?

I wonder just how that meeting between Silvetti and AHATA went?  And I wonder when, exactly, it took place?

Remember Jorge Pesquera - wasn't he the former President of AHATA - admitting to Beth that there was a cover up that had taken place.

I wonder just how far AHATA was willing to go to further that cover up?  I wonder if they would have gone as far as offering a boat Owner some incentives to look the other way if and when anything was found?


Aruba
US still drives business to Aruba after Holloway case closed
By Hazel Heyer | Jan 16, 2008
Nassau, Bahamas (eTN) -


eTN: Has this been a big challenge to tourism?

Briesen:  Among all challenges we’ve faced, including airlift, US economy slowdown, gas prices etc, this particularly has taken up our time and resources. Everybody got involved in this case. People from the tourism department have been moved to the justice department to help solve the disappearance. This incident has kept us ‘hostage’ for more than a year. In 2006, we even launched an ad campaign worth $5 M in the US to counter the negative broadcast.

http://www.eturbonews.com/865/us-still-drives-business-aruba-after-holloway-case-closed


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #793 1/13/09
Post by: jen3560 on January 15, 2009, 01:06:41 PM
I can't get mind off of CapsLockWizzard.
Since I am not in the know or connected, I have no idea who he is.
I am not sure it even matters who he is.
It does concern me who would employ him to spread misinformation,
keep people searching to worthless ends and invent a witness.
Who sent Caps here to create the diversion?

ktf is right - caps' pal is Clyde Burke.  And according to caps himself - he has a relative who is an attorney and works with the OM's office.

Those two things alone tell me a lot.


I think I remember seeing a post here from way long ago - that Caps' real last name is one that's reared its head a time or two in this case - and I believe that was correct.

And no - it's not Croes or Mansur, lol.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #793 1/13/09
Post by: Keepthefaith on January 15, 2009, 01:07:24 PM
Well anyways I would like to support Kermits efforts to put pressure on..But onto whom ?
As I see it we have some extremely rich evil people who have conspired together. Anyone who seems to be of any threat has been eliminated. John S. appears to have made all his money for his efforts in the stock sales of his companies shares..
This is a big business move..  A way of funding somebodies efforts for a job well done.
He found the fish trap and you see today that Hugo is after the very same ocean floor that John has mapped out.. With that mapped out floor oil platforms can be pre built for any area determined to have a drill able spot.
 It is probably WHY we now see Hugo chum up with American oil and Dutch oil companies..
The politics are very think here..
Natalee is a victim of far more then just 3 boys after a little drug and rape session in my humble opinion.



What does Paulus know that protects him and his Sporter of a boy,Joran,to all ends of the earth???One would think Paulus has to have written,picture,and or video documentation against some Major players or why would he and his sporter be given a FREE pass to kill and murder???


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #793 1/13/09
Post by: Tamikosmom on January 15, 2009, 01:14:48 PM
Well anyways I would like to support Kermits efforts to put pressure on..But onto whom ?
As I see it we have some extremely rich evil people who have conspired together. Anyone who seems to be of any threat has been eliminated. John S. appears to have made all his money for his efforts in the stock sales of his companies shares..
This is a big business move..  A way of funding somebodies efforts for a job well done.
He found the fish trap and you see today that Hugo is after the very same ocean floor that John has mapped out.. With that mapped out floor oil platforms can be pre built for any area determined to have a drill able spot.
 It is probably WHY we now see Hugo chum up with American oil and Dutch oil companies..
The politics are very think here..
Natalee is a victim of far more then just 3 boys after a little drug and rape session in my humble opinion.



What does Paulus know that protects him and his Sporter of a boy,Joran,to all ends of the earth???One would think Paulus has to have written,picture,and or video documentation against some Major players or why would he and his sporter be given a FREE pass to kill and murder???


Joran van der Sloot's age implies he should never have been allowed on the premises of the Excelsior Casino.  He should never have been allowed on the premises of Carlos and Charlies'.  He should never have been allowed on the premises of the Radisson.  He should never have been allowed on the premises of the Wyndham.  Yet he was not only given access to these establishments ... given access to unsuspecting young ladies ... he was allowed to drink alcohol and gamble.

Was Joran and Paulus participants in the Aruban underground economy which encompasses drugs, alcohol, sex trade, gambling, money laundering, pornograph ... ?

Janet

++++++


'Rita Cosby Live & Direct' for April 3
updated 8:24 a.m. PT, Tues., April. 4, 2006


JOHN Q. KELLY, HOLLOWAY FAMILY ATTORNEY: Well, if you look at the surveillance video footage, it appears that he’s the one sitting directly next to her and tries to engage her in conversation a couple of times.  And it’s sort of ironic that it’s his father who brought his underage son to a casino and left him there after he left, with access to his line of credit, to put this unfortunate chain of events in process.

You know, if Joran had never been there, not been allowed in there, because he’s underage and wasn’t accompanied by his father, the whole rest of the night wouldn’t have happened.

COSBY: You know, and, John, also, why would that be a significant—why is that in conflict to something else we’ve heard maybe from Paulus before?

KELLY: Well, he’s just claiming that, you know, he’s kept an eye on his son, you know, he’s kept him on a short leash, and, you know, his son is very well-behaved. And it turns out that he’s, you know, got him at casinos. If you’re under 18, you’re not legally even allowed in casinos, so his son was breaking the law with him enabling it.

http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/12150698/


Jossy Mansur
DANA PRETZER
July 23, 2007


Dana: One thing that makes my listeners scratch their heads so to speak and wonder, myself included and we'll talk about it again, is the fact of the underage drinking and gambling that had been going on admittedly by young van der Sloot.  Was there ever any discussion or has there ever been any discussion at least of filing some charges as far as that goes?

Jossy:  No, there hasn't been any of that. The authorities have just (inaudible) it aside, they haven't paid any attention to it then and they're not paying any attention to it now and over the past 26 months.    I haven't seen anything in the direction of trying to make some kind of statement that this is not (inaudiable) at least make some sort of a statement that this is not (inaubible) because it is a known fact that as an underage he wasn't supposed to be in the casino, much less in the company of his father. He was there, there are video tapes to prove that and still the authorities haven't done anything with regard to that specific case.

http://scaredmonkeysradio.com/2007/07/23/the-dana-pretzer-show-monday-july-23rd-2007-special-guests-larry-sinclair-jossy-mansur-ladonna-meredith-attorney-jay-paul-deratany/


Joran van der Sloot
Suspect Statement
June 9, 2005


After that we drove straight to Carlos & Charlies. Deepak was the driver but I cannot remember now who was sitting beside him. I do not remember now if it was Satish or me. I estimate that we arrived at Carlos & Charlies between 00.15 and 00.30 hours. Deepak parked his car on the parking lot behind Carlos & Charlies and after that we walked into the building of Carlos & Charlies. I don't have to pay because I have a VIP pass. With my VIP pass Deepak and Satish were also allowed in.

To your question as to who gave me the VIP pass to Carlos & Charlies, I answer you that I got it through the office of Carlos & Charlies. I do not remember with the help of who I got the VIP pass. I got to Carlos & Charlies about one to three times a week.


Beth Holloway
LOVING NATALEE

Page 39:
  Following our brief conversation, we all walk immediately to the fron desk to ask about someone named Joran who is staying in the hotel and plays in the casino here.  The Holiday Inn night manager, Brenda, knows him by name.  "Oh! yes ... yes ... Joran.  He gambles in the Excelsior Casino here.  He likes to prey on young female tourists.  Especially the blonds.   He is tall.  Good-looking boy.  Like a Dutch marine."   My mouth drops wide open.  "Where is he from?" I ask her.  She replies.  "He lives in Aruba."  I stutter.  "He's ... he's not a tourist just here for the summer?"  "Non, non," she says.

It takes a few moments to absorb this information.  The supposed tourist who befriended some of Natalee's classmates and who told them he was staying at their hotel lied tothem.  He isn't a tourist.  He isn't staying here.


Deepak Kalpoe
Suspect Statement
June 13, 2005


Andre asked me to come inside. I did go inside. I did not play, but did look at the cards of Joran and Guido.

At some given moment in time a tourist who was sitting at Joran's table got angry. The tourist thought that we were looking at the cards of other players and signaling/deciding for Joran when he should play or not. It lead to a disagreement between Joran and the tourist. The manager of the Radisson Casino came over and everything calmed down. I drank about four "whisky coke" gedronken in the Radisson Casino.  I now that Joran drank more because the waiters were constantly bringing him drinks.   I am not sure .what he was drinking. His drinks were of a yellow colour. I think it was “whisky soda" or 'Whisky water".


Aruba Suspects Accused of Taking Sex Photos of Another Girl
Thursday, September 01, 2005


The Kalpoe brothers were released July 4 and rearrested last week with a friend of the three young men, Freddy Alexander Zedan-Arambatzis (search), 21.
 
Zedan-Arambatzis, who is not suspected of involvement in the Holloway case, is accused of taking photos of a minor female in "tempting poses" and of showing the photos to other people, said his lawyer, Diana Emerencia. He is also suspected of having unspecified "physical contact" with the girl, she said.

The Kalpoe brothers and van der Sloot are also suspected of involvement in the incident, which allegedly occurred before Holloway disappeared, Emerencia said.

http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,168233,00.html


'Scarborough Country' for August 26
updated 12:49 p.m. PT, Mon., Aug. 29, 2005


JOSSY MANSUR, EDITOR, “DIARIO”:  It definitely smells that way.  You know, if you take the prosecution‘s statement at its face, we are talking on a whole new level, the charges here.  We are talking about drugs.  We are talking about rape and we are talking about rape of many different people.  There are four guys now in custody, four best friends.  What does that tell you?
 
MANSUR:  Well, what it tells me is that, really, these four guys are friends.  They belong to the same group, these party boys that go out and prey on young, unsuspected girls or other kinds of girls also that are out to have a good time, not suspecting what they‘re in for with these predators around.

And they are—they not only appear in photographs together, but I understand that Freddy lives very near to the Joran house.  So, there is a bond between them.  There is a group that they call themselves the pimps, in which all of these participate.

http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/9119491/


'The Abrams Report' for August 4
updated 8:37 a.m. PT, Fri., Aug. 5, 2005


TWITTY:  You know it's a pretty long scenario; we have a lot of details.  You know the main thing to sum it up is you know Joran, how he entered this establishment.  I believe that you know if you enter on the right side, you have to have a valid I.D.  If you enter Carlos N' Charlie's on the left side, you must have some type of—I don't know if it's a VIP pass or what to enter, but Joran enters the establishment on the left side, approaches these groups of tourists. 

You know it's interesting how he is able to try to work his way in and connect and establish himself in that—in Carlos N' Charlie's, was walking her around and these other tourists and was able to point out Satish and Deepak Kalpoe.  They were sitting ironically in the same corner, the same stools that they were seated at in the picture that's been all over international media, so that must be their spot that they wait while Joran is working.

http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/8838598
 

Deepak Kalpoe
Suspect Statement
June 10, 2005


To your question as to what role Joran plays in our circle of friends, I can state the following. He has no real role. We are all the same.

To your question as to where we take the girls we pick up, I can state the following. Sometimes the girls stay at "Carlos & Charlies" or sometimes we take them to their hotel.

To your question was to what exactly happens when we have picked up the girls, I can state the following. Just kissing and dancing.

To your question whether sexual intercourse has happened, I can state the following. Yes, it has happened.

To your question whether it ever happened that all of us, so in one room, had sexual intercourse, I can state the following. It has happened.



Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #793 1/13/09
Post by: Edward on January 15, 2009, 01:18:02 PM
Paulus is not pointing fingers at anyone...Paulus is of no assistance to ALE..
He has only said his son was 200 percent innocent.. He heads up a lawsuit from behind the scenes for Deepak to gain untold fortunes if he wins..
He more appears to be part of rather then some outsider.
He and Joran are inside of the syndicate of players.

Like WRECK says... It Is A Cosmic WTF !!!  ::MonkeyEek::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #793 1/13/09
Post by: Tamikosmom on January 15, 2009, 01:34:19 PM



I believe Paulus and/or Joran must have mob ties proven by the fact that Tacopino was defending Joran.  There is no other explanation.


Iris and I are not on the same page often but ... on this I tend to agree.

Janet

++++++++


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #793 1/13/09
Post by: jen3560 on January 15, 2009, 01:39:27 PM
Well anyways I would like to support Kermits efforts to put pressure on..But onto whom ?
As I see it we have some extremely rich evil people who have conspired together. Anyone who seems to be of any threat has been eliminated. John S. appears to have made all his money for his efforts in the stock sales of his companies shares..  This is a big business move..  A way of funding somebodies efforts for a job well done.
He found the fish trap and you see today that Hugo is after the very same ocean floor that John has mapped out.. With that mapped out floor oil platforms can be pre built for any area determined to have a drill able spot.
 It is probably WHY we now see Hugo chum up with American oil and Dutch oil companies..
The politics are very think here..
Natalee is a victim of far more then just 3 boys after a little drug and rape session in my humble opinion.



That was actually Luis Shaefer who did that.

I seriously would like to know if what some at cng are stating is true - did Jug know that the main goal of the Persistence was oil related?

And then how that relates to what Chavez and the Russians are now doing, if at all?

And then also about the natural gas to Aruba from Venezuela that they agreed to last June?

Remember - the one that would require a pipeline between the two countries?

Because you're right Edward - any/all of this could benefit from the mapping of the ocean floor the Persistence did.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #793 1/13/09
Post by: Keepthefaith on January 15, 2009, 01:40:37 PM
Well anyways I would like to support Kermits efforts to put pressure on..But onto whom ?
As I see it we have some extremely rich evil people who have conspired together. Anyone who seems to be of any threat has been eliminated. John S. appears to have made all his money for his efforts in the stock sales of his companies shares..  
This is a big business move..  A way of funding somebodies efforts for a job well done.
He found the fish trap and you see today that Hugo is after the very same ocean floor that John has mapped out.. With that mapped out floor oil platforms can be pre built for any area determined to have a drill able spot.
 It is probably WHY we now see Hugo chum up with American oil and Dutch oil companies..
The politics are very think here..
Natalee is a victim of far more then just 3 boys after a little drug and rape session in my humble opinion.



Was it Silvetti or Schaeffer that got the BIG payday from stocks?I thought it was Schaeffer?Let me know if they both got paid..TIA


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #793 1/13/09
Post by: Keepthefaith on January 15, 2009, 01:41:49 PM



I believe Paulus and/or Joran must have mob ties proven by the fact that Tacopino was defending Joran.  There is no other explanation.


Iris and I are not on the same page often but ... on this I tend to agree.

Janet

++++++++

Doesn't Taco own some businesses in Italy?


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #793 1/13/09
Post by: 2NJSons_Mom on January 15, 2009, 01:42:11 PM
Edward,

It was Louis Schaefer, whose Superior Offshore International, Inc. (DEEP) went under and stock shares were sold off by chief executives.....not John S., as you posted.     


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #793 1/13/09
Post by: jen3560 on January 15, 2009, 01:44:24 PM


Was it Silvetti or Schaeffer that got the BIG payday from stocks?I thought it was Schaeffer?Let me know if they both got paid..TIA

Luis Shaefer sold stocks of Superior Offshore, and then resigned from its Board.

I believe that was November 2007?  That's when HE brought Silvetti/Persistence in at the last minute.

Luis Shaefer and Tim Trahan together ran Underwater Expeditions, which appears to still be operational under Tim Trahan.

Silvetti's companies skills and abilities include the oil industry........up to and including underwater construction (including pipelines)


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #793 1/13/09
Post by: Keepthefaith on January 15, 2009, 01:47:31 PM


Was it Silvetti or Schaeffer that got the BIG payday from stocks?I thought it was Schaeffer?Let me know if they both got paid..TIA

Luis Shaefer sold stocks of Superior Offshore, and then resigned from its Board.

I believe that was November 2007?  That's when HE brought Silvetti/Persistence in at the last minute.

Luis Shaefer and Tim Trahan together ran Underwater Expeditions, which appears to still be operational under Tim Trahan.

Silvetti's companies skills and abilities include the oil industry........up to and including underwater construction (including pipelines)

Is there any need to research the backgrounds of those involved in the securities litigation Jen?Did The Freebirds already do that to see what role they played in potentially securing something of this nature for Schaeffer?TIA


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #793 1/13/09
Post by: Edward on January 15, 2009, 01:48:35 PM
Edward,

It was Louis Schaefer, whose Superior Offshore International, Inc. (DEEP) went under and stock shares were sold off by chief executives.....not John S., as you posted.     

Thank You for the correction, I got my names mixed up.. That is what happens if I shoot from the hip in this case without my notes.. The gun always goes off in my holster and I shoots myself in the Foots.. ::MonkeyWink::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #793 1/13/09
Post by: 2NJSons_Mom on January 15, 2009, 01:49:54 PM



I believe Paulus and/or Joran must have mob ties proven by the fact that Tacopino was defending Joran.  There is no other explanation.


Iris and I are not on the same page often but ... on this I tend to agree.

Janet

++++++++

Doesn't Taco own some businesses in Italy?

I read the other day that his parents are Italian immigrants.  Taco has a law office in Italy and had an interest in buying a soccer team, iirc....don't remember anything else other than he's fluent in Italian, but I'd have to reread.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #793 1/13/09
Post by: Keepthefaith on January 15, 2009, 01:50:13 PM
Edward,

It was Louis Schaefer, whose Superior Offshore International, Inc. (DEEP) went under and stock shares were sold off by chief executives.....not John S., as you posted.     

Thank You for the correction, I got my names mixed up.. That is what happens if I shoot from the hip in this case without my notes.. The gun always goes off in my holster and I shoots myself in the Foots.. ::MonkeyWink::

I've never seen a one-footed Monkey Edward.Don't be the first! ::MonkeyLaugh::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #793 1/13/09
Post by: jen3560 on January 15, 2009, 01:52:04 PM


Was it Silvetti or Schaeffer that got the BIG payday from stocks?I thought it was Schaeffer?Let me know if they both got paid..TIA

Luis Shaefer sold stocks of Superior Offshore, and then resigned from its Board.

I believe that was November 2007?  That's when HE brought Silvetti/Persistence in at the last minute.

Luis Shaefer and Tim Trahan together ran Underwater Expeditions, which appears to still be operational under Tim Trahan.

Silvetti's companies skills and abilities include the oil industry........up to and including underwater construction (including pipelines)

Is there any need to research the backgrounds of those involved in the securities litigation Jen?Did The Freebirds already do that to see what role they played in potentially securing something of this nature for Schaeffer?TIA

I don't think there's a need for that, but that's just my opinion.  Shaefer is who appears to have pocketed the $$, and that's why everyone is suing him now.

We followed the money after that, including his purchase and immediate bankruptcy of that fishing business, and that bed and breakfast.

But that Underwater Expeditions is still soluble is what I find most interesting.

There were a decent amount of physical assets with that fishing company (boats) where did they go?  What are they doing now?

What happened to the physical assets of Superior Offshore (boats)?

What about the lease back agreements on those boats that were sold?

Supposedly, it was SHAEFER whose purpose in the Persistence's endeavor was oil related.

So what did Silvetti get out of that - or what will he be getting?


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #793 1/13/09
Post by: Keepthefaith on January 15, 2009, 01:52:12 PM



I believe Paulus and/or Joran must have mob ties proven by the fact that Tacopino was defending Joran.  There is no other explanation.


Iris and I are not on the same page often but ... on this I tend to agree.

Janet

++++++++

Doesn't Taco own some businesses in Italy?

I read the other day that his parents are Italian immigrants.  Taco has a law office in Italy and had an interest in buying a soccer team, iirc....don't remember anything else other than he's fluent in Italian, but I'd have to reread.

Where do you get that kind of money representing clients Pro-Bono?Depending on the soccer team,one would think it would be quite spendy?Home in Italy,Home in the USA,businesses in both countries just from being a Lawyer.WOW. ::MonkeyCool::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #793 1/13/09
Post by: Keepthefaith on January 15, 2009, 01:56:47 PM


Was it Silvetti or Schaeffer that got the BIG payday from stocks?I thought it was Schaeffer?Let me know if they both got paid..TIA

Luis Shaefer sold stocks of Superior Offshore, and then resigned from its Board.

I believe that was November 2007?  That's when HE brought Silvetti/Persistence in at the last minute.

Luis Shaefer and Tim Trahan together ran Underwater Expeditions, which appears to still be operational under Tim Trahan.

Silvetti's companies skills and abilities include the oil industry........up to and including underwater construction (including pipelines)

Is there any need to research the backgrounds of those involved in the securities litigation Jen?Did The Freebirds already do that to see what role they played in potentially securing something of this nature for Schaeffer?TIA

I don't think there's a need for that, but that's just my opinion.  Shaefer is who appears to have pocketed the $$, and that's why everyone is suing him now.

We followed the money after that, including his purchase and immediate bankruptcy of that fishing business, and that bed and breakfast.

But that Underwater Expeditions is still soluble is what I find most interesting.

There were a decent amount of physical assets with that fishing company (boats) where did they go?  What are they doing now?

What happened to the physical assets of Superior Offshore (boats)?

What about the lease back agreements on those boats that were sold?

Supposedly, it was SHAEFER whose purpose in the Persistence's endeavor was oil related.

So what did Silvetti get out of that - or what will he be getting?

Now the question is how to tie Schaeffer,and or Silvetti to the island in order to do business in the future!How can we do that? ::MonkeyConfused:: I know we've been trying.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #793 1/13/09
Post by: Keepthefaith on January 15, 2009, 02:00:17 PM
Don't know if this specific article has already been posted??

http://www.findingdulcinea.com/news/international/2009/jan/Russia-and-Venezuela-Drill-Near-Aruba--Fueling-Cold-War-Fears-.html


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #793 1/13/09
Post by: Tamikosmom on January 15, 2009, 02:06:20 PM


I believe Paulus and/or Joran must have mob ties proven by the fact that Tacopino was defending Joran.  There is no other explanation.


Iris and I are not on the same page often but ... on this I tend to agree.

Janet

++++++++

Doesn't Taco own some businesses in Italy?

Keepthefaith

I have no idea.  However ... I believe Michael Posner ... owner of the Excelsior casino ... had everything to do with Joe Tacopina's representation of Joran van der Sloot.

The Island of Aruba did not anticipate the strength and determination of a mother by the name of Beth Holloway Twitty. By the time that Aruba realized that this amazing woman was not about to be silenced until her quest for answers regarding her precious daughter were answered … it was too late to turn back. It was no longer just about protecting Paulus and Joran in regards to their role in the events that encompass that fateful morning.  It was now about protecting those at all levels of the Aruban/Dutch administrations who were involved in the coverup … it was now about protecting the sons of the elite … it was now about protecting the judiciary and … it was now about the implications of exposing Michael Posner's little secrets in regards to organized crime … drugs … gambling … prostitution … pornography … money laundering.

What was the real Joran/Paulus/Posner connection?

Why did Michael Posner hire American attorney Joe Tacopina to represent Joran?

Why did Michael Posner hire a private investigator to search for Natalee Holloway?

Why did Paulus not face any consequences for accompanying his underage son to a casino for the purpose of gambling and drinking?

Janet

+++++++++

Aruban casino boss had ties to Chicago mob
Thursday, February 23, 2006 | 6:07 PM
Missing Alabama teen last seen at casino
By Chuck Goudie


February 23, 2006 (WLS) -- Authorities on the island of Aruba have not been able to solve the mystery of what happened to Alabama teenager Natalie Holloway. She disappeared while on a high school trip last spring. The ABC7 I-Team has learned new details about the casino where Holloway was last seen, an Aruba casino run by a convicted high-ranking Chicago mobster.

The unsolved disappearance of 18-year-old Natalie Holloway has commanded worldwide attention. It has been widely reported that the last place Holloway was known to be alive was the Excelsior casino connected to the Holiday Inn where she and her classmates were staying.
 
The I-Team has learned that the casino where Holloway was last seen is operated by Chicagoan Michael Posner. The intelligence report on Posner lists him as a prominent member of the Chicago outfit for more than 40 years.

According to federal law enforcement, Michael Posner's most recent mob assignment was boss of illegal rackets in the north suburbs. Posner was convicted in 1987 of threatening wayward gamblers with death and running prostitutes out of this Lake County strip club.

Through his Chicago lawyer, Posner maintains that he has been clean for 15 years and since 1998 has operated the Excelsior casino on the Caribbean resort on the island of Aruba.
 
Last May, honor student Natalie Holloway was staying at the resort on her high school graduation trip when she disappeared. One of the last places she was seen alive was in Posner's Excelsior casino.
 
In security tape obtained by ABC News, Holloway is seen at a table seated next to Joran van der Sloot, a local who is the prime suspect in the case.

Van der Slout admits having had a romantic encounter with Holloway, but in an exclusive interview to air Thursday night on Primetime, he says he is no criminal.

"I think I've been portrayed unfairly. I've been portrayed as a murderer and a rapist and everything that I'm not," van der Sloot said.

Casino boss Michael Posner denies that he knows van der Sloot and denies ever extending him casino credit.

Posner's lawyer Allan Ackerman says Posner was in Chicago when Holloway vanished and returned to Aruba the day after.
 
Now 64 years old, here's the intelligence report on Michael William Posner:

* aka Michael Rubins and Irving Goldstein.

* his family still resides in Riverwoods.
 
* his criminal profile lists involvement in illegal gambling, strip clubs and vending machines.

* criminal history dates to 1960 includes numerous arrests and successful tax and racketeering prosecutions.
 
Posner says it was he who voluntarily turned over this casino surveillance tape to Aruban authorities and that he is furious they have allowed ABC News to broadcast it.

Posner says he has paid the expenses for private investigators to come here and assist in the search for Holloway and according to his lawyer: "He has nothin' to do with nothing" in the murder case.

http://abclocal.go.com/wls/story?section=investigative&id=3936339


DANA PRETZER
July 23, 2007


Dana: One thing that makes my listeners scratch their heads so to speak and wonder, myself included and we'll talk about it again, is the fact of the underage drinking and gambling that had been going on admittedly by young van der Sloot.  Was there ever any discussion or has there ever been any discussion at least of filing some charges as far as that goes?

Jossy:  No, there hasn't been any of that. The authorities have just (inaudible) it aside, they haven't paid any attention to it then and they're not paying any attention to it now and over the past 26 months.  I haven't seen anything in the direction of trying to make some kind of statement that this is not (inaudiable) at least make some sort of a statement that this is not (inaubible) because it is a known fact that as an underage he wasn't supposed to be in the casino, much less in the company of his father. He was there, there are video tapes to prove that and still the authorities haven't done anything with regard to that specific case.

http://scaredmonkeysradio.com/2007/07/23/the-dana-pretzer-show-monday-july-23rd-2007-special-guests-larry-sinclair-jossy-mansur-ladonna-meredith-attorney-jay-paul-deratany/


'Rita Cosby Live & Direct' for Sept. 19th
updated 6:33 a.m. PT, Tues., Sept. 20, 2005


COPUS:  Well this guy has that casino.  He‘s alleged to have organized crime ties back to Chicago.  And you can say alleged, he‘s actually served time.  He‘s been convicted.  So he comes up into Aruba and is able to get a gambling casino.  At the same time, we‘re told that Joran and his dad both are gambling there.  It really makes you wonder how that‘s happening and how they got this line of credit. 

COSBY:  Yes.  And a big, big line of credit.  Beth, I know you‘ve actually been to the casino, right?  And Michael Posner threatened you, is that correct? 

HOLLOWAY TWITTY:  Well, there was a phone call made.  And it was just really having me refer to—you know, I‘d only mentioned the fact I had gotten from prosecuting attorney as far as the open line of credit, and that Joran is in his casino gambling, and  I don‘t think there was ever a question that Joran and Paulus Van Der Sloot had been in that Excelsior Casino, and, particularly, on the night of the 29th where he and his father met Natalee.

http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/9407728/


'Rita Cosby Live & Direct'
April 3, 2006


COSBY … John, first of all, is there a possibility that Paulus might have been talking to Natalee the night that she disappeared?

JOHN Q. KELLY, HOLLOWAY FAMILY ATTORNEY: Well, if you look at the surveillance video footage, it appears that he’s the one sitting directly next to her and tries to engage her in conversation a couple of times. And it’s sort of ironic that it’s his father who brought his underage son to a casino and left him there after he left, with access to his line of credit, to put this unfortunate chain of events in process.


Beth Holloway
LOVING NATALEE

Page 39:
  Following our brief conversation, we all walk immediately to the fron desk to ask about someone named Joran who is staying in the hotel and plays in the casino here.  The Holiday Inn night manager, Brenda, knows him by name.  "Oh! yes ... yes ... Joran.  He gambles in the Excelsior Casino here.  He likes to prey on young female tourists.  Especially the blonds.   He is tall.  Good-looking boy.  Like a Dutch marine."   My mouth drops wide open.  "Where is he from?" I ask her.  She replies.  "He lives in Aruba."  I stutter.  "He's ... he's not a tourist just here for the summer?"  "Non, non," she says.

It takes a few moments to absorb this information.  The supposed tourist who befriended some of Natalee's classmates and who told them he was staying at their hotel lied tothem.  He isn't a tourist.  He isn't staying here.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #793 1/13/09
Post by: jen3560 on January 15, 2009, 02:16:08 PM


Now the question is how to tie Schaeffer,and or Silvetti to the island in order to do business in the future!How can we do that? ::MonkeyConfused:: I know we've been trying.

One thing to find out would be if Silvetti opened up an Aruban office like he had plans to do last spring.

Or maybe one on Venezuela?


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #793 1/13/09
Post by: jen3560 on January 15, 2009, 02:18:58 PM
Janet - I couldn't agree with you more!

Tacopina has represented many in the Gambino family.........to which Posner is/was tied.

Posner IS the connection between Joey T and Paulus.

Also don't foget - Guido Wever could ONLY be interviewed by ALE in Posner's office at the casino.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #793 1/13/09
Post by: Edward on January 15, 2009, 02:20:48 PM
One of Aruba's wealthiest and most powerful families alleges that a partner at its longtime law firm, Podhurst Orseck in Miami, made an error in judgment that led to the loss of a $15 million property.

Five members of the Mansur family, who have Dutch citizenship and business interests in Aruba, filed suit in Miami-Dade Circuit Court in March alleging that Podhurst partner Katherine Ezell mishandled their lawsuit against two family members entrusted with managing Terminal Island in Miami Beach. That's a deep port off the MacArthur Causeway that serves as a ferry terminal for the exclusive Fisher Island community off Miami Beach.

The suit alleges that Ezell's and Podhurst Orseck's errors in the case allowed the investment managers of the property, brothers Luis and Elias Mansur, to abscond with the profits from the island's $15 million sale in May 2004.

The plaintiffs have "clearly been damaged," their attorney, Daniel Koch, of Koch & Trushin in Fort Lauderdale, Fla., said in an interview. "The question is, what are the damages? If we can show that with the proper legal advice the property could have been rescued, it could be close to $20 million."

The current Mansur controversy revolves around Luis and Elias Mansur. They were the investment managers of Terminal Island, which was held in trust by them and the plaintiffs in the recent legal malpractice suit.

Luis and Elias Mansur had borrowed money against Terminal Island, which they did not repay. In 2003, the lenders, TotalBank and Interbank Aruba, filed foreclosure actions against Terminal Island. The Mansur plaintiffs asked Podhurst Orseck to resolve their problem with the island.
 
According to the suit, plaintiff Ruben Mansur advised Podhurst attorney Ezell that the investment managers were financially unstable and were planning to abscond with any proceeds from the sale.

The Podhurst attorneys "knew there was a plan to sell Terminal Island and that the investment managers were going to abscond with the money and take it overseas where it could never be touched," said Brad Trushin of Koch & Trushin, who is representing the Mansurs along with Koch.

Initially, Ezell drafted and filed a lis pendens, a claim on the property asserting that her clients were owed money from any sale that occurred. As the suit progressed, according to the recent malpractice suit, she learned that there were questions about the validity and enforceability of the Interbank Aruba mortgage.

But Ezell made a shift in legal strategy that the Mansur plaintiffs contend torpedoed their case and caused them to lose the island. According to the suit, Ezell advised the Mansur plaintiffs to withdraw the lis pendens and execute a release in favor of TotalBank and Interbank Aruba.

"Then the Podhurst firm said to my clients, 'You've got two mortgage foreclosure actions pending. Your only or best recourse is to make nice with the investment managers and work with them to get the property sold,'" Trushin said. The Podhurst firm, he said, promised to monitor Terminal Island to make sure the Mansur plaintiffs got their share of the sale proceeds.

That approach did not work. When the island was sold for $15 million to Barco Holdings in 2004, Interbank and TotalBank were paid off. But the investment managers transferred the money overseas.

Ezell then filed suit on behalf of the Mansur plaintiffs in Miami-Dade Circuit Court asking for an accounting of the property sale and for appointment of a special master to investigate the misuse of trust assets.

The investment managers responded that the trust granted them the authority to sell the property and hold the proceeds, and further argued that Ezell's legal action was filed in the wrong jurisdiction.

Since the trust that owned Terminal Island was based in the British Virgin Islands and since none of the parties were U.S. citizens, the investment managers argued that Miami-Dade was an improper jurisdiction for the case. Then-Circuit Judge Michael Chavies sided with the investment managers and dismissed the case.

http://www.law.com/jsp/article.jsp?id=1148547934537

The Mansur group specializes in this behavior.. Notice the names involved..
20 million disappers and is untouchable. They themsleves owned the InterBank !!
Luis M."The Boss" and "Elias M."  Who is also known as the brain child of the family..

They got away clean a a wistle..

Now look at Luis Shaefer  ::MonkeyWink::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #793 1/13/09
Post by: bastibro on January 15, 2009, 02:24:22 PM
I'm sorry. Something went wrong in my previous reaction. It wasn't Edward saying "marlene = Marlies" but it was me.

Yep, Goodmorning Jan Willem!

Sorry Bastibro...I didn't see you there...Good Morning!

Have a great day!

Hi Mum, i just logged in again.  Great day to you tooo ::MonkeyWink::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #793 1/13/09
Post by: Tamikosmom on January 15, 2009, 02:37:05 PM
Janet - I couldn't agree with you more!

Tacopina has represented many in the Gambino family.........to which Posner is/was tied.

Posner IS the connection between Joey T and Paulus.

Also don't foget - Guido Wever could ONLY be interviewed by ALE in Posner's office at the casino.

Jen ... justice for Natalee Holloway implies that accountability is sooo far reaching.  This is why I do not believe that justice is not going to come out of an Aruban or Dutch courtroom.

The exposure of the deception encompassing the Persisistence undertaking would allow a measure of closure for Natalee's family.  I certainly hope that the FBI are working behind the scenes on behalf of Natalee Holloway's family to bring this exposure about.  After all ... it was an American citizen who was denied ... through a corrupt investigation ...  what she was entitled to under Dutch law ... justice. 

Janet


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #793 1/13/09
Post by: Keepthefaith on January 15, 2009, 02:41:30 PM
Janet - I couldn't agree with you more!

Tacopina has represented many in the Gambino family.........to which Posner is/was tied.

Posner IS the connection between Joey T and Paulus.

Also don't foget - Guido Wever could ONLY be interviewed by ALE in Posner's office at the casino.

Jen ... justice for Natalee Holloway implies that accountability is sooo far reaching.  This is why I do not believe that justice is not going to come out of an Aruban or Dutch courtroom.

The exposure of the deception encompassing the Persisistence undertaking would allow a measure of closure for Natalee's family.  I certainly hope that the FBI are working behind the scenes on behalf of Natalee Holloway's family to bring this exposure about.  After all ... it was an American citizen who was denied ... through a corrupt investigation ...  what she was entitled to under Dutch law ... justice. 

Janet

I agree Janet.This goes from Aruba straight to the Hague.The Netherlands don't want anything to do with this. ::MonkeyCool::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #793 1/13/09
Post by: jen3560 on January 15, 2009, 02:47:13 PM


Now the question is how to tie Schaeffer,and or Silvetti to the island in order to do business in the future!How can we do that? ::MonkeyConfused:: I know we've been trying.

Also keep in mind, Shaefer (thru Superior) has a good working history with BP.

Superior Offshore International Senior Executives Cancel 10b5-1 Trading Plans

HOUSTON (AP) -- Oilfield service provider Superior Offshore International Inc. said Friday two senior executives canceled prearranged trading plans that gave them greater freedom to buy or sell the company's shares.




President and Chief Executive Officer James J. Mermis and Chief Financial and Administrative Officer Roger D. Burks each ended their 10b5-1 trading plans, which had been set up partly to pay income tax on granted stock, the company said.

A prearranged 10b5-1 trading plan lets company insiders set up a program in advance for stock transactions and proceed with them even if he or she comes into possession of material non-public information.

(The Company disclosed that its $55 million Term Loan Facility with Fortis Bank has been classified as a current obligation per FASB reporting requirements because the Company did not meet certain requirements of its term loan debt covenants.)

Trinidad project was running full steam ahead during the third quarter. Three of our vessels, the Gulmar Condor, Seamec III, and the Crossmar 14 are still currently working there for BP.

------------

British Petroleum
Robert (Bob) Malone is BP's chief representative in the United States. He is based in Houston, Texas........... where BP business units are involved in oil and natural gas exploration and production, refining, chemicals, supply and trading, pipeline operations

-------------

Byron Grote Job title: Chief Financial Officer of BP

Byron is a non-executive director of Unilever NA and Unilever

Unilever constantly keeps its corporate governance arrangements under review. NV and PLC are subject to different corporate governance requirements and best practice codes, the most relevant being those in the Netherlands.
-----------------

South America
Exploration and production work is a core aspect of BP’s presence in Colombia and Venezuela.
--------------

John S. distributes APS Sonavision sonars in the Gulf ,APS LLC focuses specifically on the navigation and sonar needs of the oil and gas industry.

APS is the navigation, positioning and sonar services arm within the JD Silvetti Group of Companies. APS is responsible for most call out projects that do not require certifications, as well as non-certification specialized projects.



Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #793 1/13/09
Post by: Keepthefaith on January 15, 2009, 02:50:17 PM


Now the question is how to tie Schaeffer,and or Silvetti to the island in order to do business in the future!How can we do that? ::MonkeyConfused:: I know we've been trying.

Also keep in mind, Shaefer (thru Superior) has a good working history with BP.

Superior Offshore International Senior Executives Cancel 10b5-1 Trading Plans

HOUSTON (AP) -- Oilfield service provider Superior Offshore International Inc. said Friday two senior executives canceled prearranged trading plans that gave them greater freedom to buy or sell the company's shares.




President and Chief Executive Officer James J. Mermis and Chief Financial and Administrative Officer Roger D. Burks each ended their 10b5-1 trading plans, which had been set up partly to pay income tax on granted stock, the company said.

A prearranged 10b5-1 trading plan lets company insiders set up a program in advance for stock transactions and proceed with them even if he or she comes into possession of material non-public information.

(The Company disclosed that its $55 million Term Loan Facility with Fortis Bank has been classified as a current obligation per FASB reporting requirements because the Company did not meet certain requirements of its term loan debt covenants.)

Trinidad project was running full steam ahead during the third quarter. Three of our vessels, the Gulmar Condor, Seamec III, and the Crossmar 14 are still currently working there for BP.

------------

British Petroleum
Robert (Bob) Malone is BP's chief representative in the United States. He is based in Houston, Texas........... where BP business units are involved in oil and natural gas exploration and production, refining, chemicals, supply and trading, pipeline operations

-------------

Byron Grote Job title: Chief Financial Officer of BP

Byron is a non-executive director of Unilever NA and Unilever

Unilever constantly keeps its corporate governance arrangements under review. NV and PLC are subject to different corporate governance requirements and best practice codes, the most relevant being those in the Netherlands.
-----------------

South America
Exploration and production work is a core aspect of BP’s presence in Colombia and Venezuela.
--------------

John S. distributes APS Sonavision sonars in the Gulf ,APS LLC focuses specifically on the navigation and sonar needs of the oil and gas industry.

APS is the navigation, positioning and sonar services arm within the JD Silvetti Group of Companies. APS is responsible for most call out projects that do not require certifications, as well as non-certification specialized projects.



Schaeffer was at the right place at the right time! ::MonkeyLaugh:: How did he REALLY come to the search of Natalee Holloway?


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #793 1/13/09
Post by: jen3560 on January 15, 2009, 02:50:20 PM
Please forgive me if this has been posted before, but here is the step by step progression of who contacted whom for this endeavor.

http://www.iberianet.com/articles/2007/11/29/news/news/news00.txt

From here to Aruba

BY JEFF MOORE, THE DAILY IBERIAN
Thursday, November 29, 2007 12:37 PM CST

An expedition to search the waters off Aruba for the remains of missing Alabama teenager Natalee Holloway leaves today from the Port of Iberia.

The research vessel Persistence, owned by the Lafayette-based Silvetti Group, will make the 10-day journey to the island. A 20- to 25-man crew will spend at least two weeks surveying the sea floor for Holloway, who has been missing since May 30, 2005.

Holloway, 18, was last seen leaving a bar with three men hours before she was scheduled to fly home with high school classmates celebrating their graduation.

Last week, police re-arrested the three men, prompting her father to re-launch the search in deep waters.

John Silvetti said his company became involved in the search after he was contacted by Louis Schaefer, chairman of Superior Offshore International. Schaefer had been approached by Texas Equusearch, a non-profit organization that has been searching for Holloway for more than two years.

Schaefer asked Silvetti if he could provide the survey personnel and the geophysical equipment required for the search. After spending a weekend with Schaefer and Pam and Dave Holloway, Silvetti agreed.

“It ripped my heart out to hear them say that right now all they’re looking for is to have a funeral in Alabama,” Silvetti said. “What do you say to someone like that?”

Silvetti agreed to provide his equipment and primary survey vessel at well below cost, with Schaefer covering all out-of-pocket expenses. Silvetti said his staff volunteered its services for the project as well.

“They said ‘You don’t even have to pay me. I just want to help,’” Silvetti said. “That just tells me we’ve got the right people on board.”

Marc Broussard, project manager for the Silvetti Group, said the company normally performs surveys looking for oil rigs and downed helicopters. Now, it will be using its high-resolution SONAR equipment to look for a body.

To upgrade its systems for the terrain in Aruba, Broussard said the Silvetti Group looked to its vendors, two of which are based in New Iberia.

Seatronics, located at the Port of Iberia, agreed to donate some of its high-tech electronic equipment to scan the ocean floor.

“I told (Silvetti) any opportunity that we had to go in on such a good cause, we would go in on it,” said Erik McGuire, vice president of Seatronics Inc.

“We’re more than happy to give the best effort possible to recover this girl for her family.”

Pro Log Inc. also stepped forth to provide a command center building where all of the surveying equipment will be stored. Like many people around the country, Pro Log Human Resources Director Heidi Parker said she has been following Holloway’s disappearance closely.

“We’re a family-owned business, so family is very important to us,” Parker said. “Anything we can do to help this family out is something that we’re going to do.”

After more than two years of searching, Texas Equusearch office manager Cheryl Lawless said she is hoping the organization’s fifth trip to Aruba will be its last. She said the venture would not be possible without the help of Schaefer, Silvetti and the other local companies.

“Nothing is being done to gain name recognition. This is to help these people,” Silvetti said. “Most of us have watched this on television, and I can only imagine the horror any parent would go through searching for their child in a foreign country.”



Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #793 1/13/09
Post by: jen3560 on January 15, 2009, 02:53:16 PM
Janet - I couldn't agree with you more!

Tacopina has represented many in the Gambino family.........to which Posner is/was tied.

Posner IS the connection between Joey T and Paulus.

Also don't foget - Guido Wever could ONLY be interviewed by ALE in Posner's office at the casino.

Jen ... justice for Natalee Holloway implies that accountability is sooo far reaching.  This is why I do not believe that justice is not going to come out of an Aruban or Dutch courtroom.

The exposure of the deception encompassing the Persisistence undertaking would allow a measure of closure for Natalee's family.  I certainly hope that the FBI are working behind the scenes on behalf of Natalee Holloway's family to bring this exposure about.  After all ... it was an American citizen who was denied ... through a corrupt investigation ...  what she was entitled to under Dutch law ... justice. 

Janet

I agree Janet - Art Wood wasn't kidding when he said it was a house of cards.  Well this house reaches higher than any I've ever seen.  To bring it down would take a lot more than I think any of us could have ever imagined.

But justice and peace of mind are two different things, IMO.

While one may not be attainable - the other still has a chance.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #793 1/13/09
Post by: Tamikosmom on January 15, 2009, 02:54:10 PM
Janet - I couldn't agree with you more!

Tacopina has represented many in the Gambino family.........to which Posner is/was tied.

Posner IS the connection between Joey T and Paulus.

Also don't foget - Guido Wever could ONLY be interviewed by ALE in Posner's office at the casino.

Jen ... justice for Natalee Holloway implies that accountability is sooo far reaching.  This is why I do not believe that justice is not going to come out of an Aruban or Dutch courtroom.

The exposure of the deception encompassing the Persisistence undertaking would allow a measure of closure for Natalee's family.  I certainly hope that the FBI are working behind the scenes on behalf of Natalee Holloway's family to bring this exposure about.  After all ... it was an American citizen who was denied ... through a corrupt investigation ...  what she was entitled to under Dutch law ... justice. 

Janet

I agree Janet.This goes from Aruba straight to the Hague.The Netherlands don't want anything to do with this. ::MonkeyCool::

Hi Keepthefaith

O/T

How are the floods in the Seattle area now?  Nothing on the news.

The floods in our area ... mostly in the Eastern Valley ... are receding.  Daughter and four grandkids were stranded in the house on high ground on their 40 acres property for a couple of days.  The tributary of the Fraser River that runs through the property overflowed.  Son-in-law ... a pilot ... was forced to bunker down at the home of hubby's sister who resides near the airport.

I am so thankful to see the snow disappearing but ... all the water.

 ::MonkeyNoNo::

Janet



Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #793 1/13/09
Post by: texasmom on January 15, 2009, 02:57:10 PM
Well anyways I would like to support Kermits efforts to put pressure on..But onto whom ?
As I see it we have some extremely rich evil people who have conspired together. Anyone who seems to be of any threat has been eliminated. John S. appears to have made all his money for his efforts in the stock sales of his companies shares..  This is a big business move..  A way of funding somebodies efforts for a job well done.
He found the fish trap and you see today that Hugo is after the very same ocean floor that John has mapped out.. With that mapped out floor oil platforms can be pre built for any area determined to have a drill able spot.
 It is probably WHY we now see Hugo chum up with American oil and Dutch oil companies..
The politics are very think here..
Natalee is a victim of far more then just 3 boys after a little drug and rape session in my humble opinion.



That was actually Luis Shaefer who did that.

I seriously would like to know if what some at cng are stating is true - did Jug know that the main goal of the Persistence was oil related?
And then how that relates to what Chavez and the Russians are now doing, if at all?

And then also about the natural gas to Aruba from Venezuela that they agreed to last June?

Remember - the one that would require a pipeline between the two countries?

Because you're right Edward - any/all of this could benefit from the mapping of the ocean floor the Persistence did.

I'd like to know the answer to that too, especially considering his employer.  McWane and it's subsidiaries.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #793 1/13/09
Post by: Tamikosmom on January 15, 2009, 03:04:27 PM
Janet - I couldn't agree with you more!

Tacopina has represented many in the Gambino family.........to which Posner is/was tied.

Posner IS the connection between Joey T and Paulus.

Also don't foget - Guido Wever could ONLY be interviewed by ALE in Posner's office at the casino.

Jen ... justice for Natalee Holloway implies that accountability is sooo far reaching.  This is why I do not believe that justice is not going to come out of an Aruban or Dutch courtroom.

The exposure of the deception encompassing the Persisistence undertaking would allow a measure of closure for Natalee's family.  I certainly hope that the FBI are working behind the scenes on behalf of Natalee Holloway's family to bring this exposure about.  After all ... it was an American citizen who was denied ... through a corrupt investigation ...  what she was entitled to under Dutch law ... justice. 

Janet

I agree Janet - Art Wood wasn't kidding when he said it was a house of cards.  Well this house reaches higher than any I've ever seen.  To bring it down would take a lot more than I think any of us could have ever imagined.

But justice and peace of mind are two different things, IMO.

While one may not be attainable - the other still has a chance.[/color]


I am counting on "the other".  I am praying that Kyle K. and Tim T. ... two key people on the Persistence undertaking ... will step up to the plate ... do what is right because it is right  and ... reveal all to the FBI and/or the family.  I realize that it is late in the game but ... a certain "peace of mind" can still be afforded to for the family of Natalee Holloway.

The house of cards may not collapse but ... the attempted finale' to the great Aruban coverup will be exposed for the world to see.

Janet





Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #793 1/13/09
Post by: Keepthefaith on January 15, 2009, 03:06:38 PM
Janet - I couldn't agree with you more!

Tacopina has represented many in the Gambino family.........to which Posner is/was tied.

Posner IS the connection between Joey T and Paulus.

Also don't foget - Guido Wever could ONLY be interviewed by ALE in Posner's office at the casino.

Jen ... justice for Natalee Holloway implies that accountability is sooo far reaching.  This is why I do not believe that justice is not going to come out of an Aruban or Dutch courtroom.

The exposure of the deception encompassing the Persisistence undertaking would allow a measure of closure for Natalee's family.  I certainly hope that the FBI are working behind the scenes on behalf of Natalee Holloway's family to bring this exposure about.  After all ... it was an American citizen who was denied ... through a corrupt investigation ...  what she was entitled to under Dutch law ... justice. 

Janet

I agree Janet.This goes from Aruba straight to the Hague.The Netherlands don't want anything to do with this. ::MonkeyCool::

Hi Keepthefaith

O/T

How are the floods in the Seattle area now?  Nothing on the news.

The floods in our area ... mostly in the Eastern Valley ... are receding.  Daughter and four grandkids were stranded in the house on high ground on their 40 acres property for a couple of days.  The tributary of the Fraser River that runs through the property overflowed.  Son-in-law ... a pilot ... was forced to bunker down at the home of hubby's sister who resides near the airport.

I am so thankful to see the snow disappearing but ... all the water.

 ::MonkeyNoNo::

Janet



It is getting better in the outlying areas.Still a lot of damage to some homes but allowing travel on I-5 south of Olympia opened up awhile back which is good.Glad to hear all are well up in the Fraser Valley. ::MonkeyCool::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #793 1/13/09
Post by: 2NJSons_Mom on January 15, 2009, 03:19:50 PM
KTF,  I know the discussion has moved from Taco, but I was just lost in Google and found an article describing his most recent client.    ::MonkeyRoll::   Note:  Las Vegas comes into play, here:

http://www.examiner.com/a-1792578~Fla__judge_accused_of_hiding_assets_for_stripper.html


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #793 1/13/09
Post by: Tamikosmom on January 15, 2009, 03:27:56 PM
Please forgive me if this has been posted before, but here is the step by step progression of who contacted whom for this endeavor.

http://www.iberianet.com/articles/2007/11/29/news/news/news00.txt

From here to Aruba

BY JEFF MOORE, THE DAILY IBERIAN
Thursday, November 29, 2007 12:37 PM CST

An expedition to search the waters off Aruba for the remains of missing Alabama teenager Natalee Holloway leaves today from the Port of Iberia.

The research vessel Persistence, owned by the Lafayette-based Silvetti Group, will make the 10-day journey to the island. A 20- to 25-man crew will spend at least two weeks surveying the sea floor for Holloway, who has been missing since May 30, 2005.

Holloway, 18, was last seen leaving a bar with three men hours before she was scheduled to fly home with high school classmates celebrating their graduation.

Last week, police re-arrested the three men, prompting her father to re-launch the search in deep waters.

John Silvetti said his company became involved in the search after he was contacted by Louis Schaefer, chairman of Superior Offshore International. Schaefer had been approached by Texas Equusearch, a non-profit organization that has been searching for Holloway for more than two years.

Schaefer asked Silvetti if he could provide the survey personnel and the geophysical equipment required for the search. After spending a weekend with Schaefer and Pam and Dave Holloway, Silvetti agreed.

“It ripped my heart out to hear them say that right now all they’re looking for is to have a funeral in Alabama,” Silvetti said. “What do you say to someone like that?”

Silvetti agreed to provide his equipment and primary survey vessel at well below cost, with Schaefer covering all out-of-pocket expenses. Silvetti said his staff volunteered its services for the project as well.

“They said ‘You don’t even have to pay me. I just want to help,’” Silvetti said. “That just tells me we’ve got the right people on board.”

Marc Broussard, project manager for the Silvetti Group, said the company normally performs surveys looking for oil rigs and downed helicopters. Now, it will be using its high-resolution SONAR equipment to look for a body.

To upgrade its systems for the terrain in Aruba, Broussard said the Silvetti Group looked to its vendors, two of which are based in New Iberia.

Seatronics, located at the Port of Iberia, agreed to donate some of its high-tech electronic equipment to scan the ocean floor.

“I told (Silvetti) any opportunity that we had to go in on such a good cause, we would go in on it,” said Erik McGuire, vice president of Seatronics Inc.

“We’re more than happy to give the best effort possible to recover this girl for her family.”

Pro Log Inc. also stepped forth to provide a command center building where all of the surveying equipment will be stored. Like many people around the country, Pro Log Human Resources Director Heidi Parker said she has been following Holloway’s disappearance closely.

“We’re a family-owned business, so family is very important to us,” Parker said. “Anything we can do to help this family out is something that we’re going to do.”

After more than two years of searching, Texas Equusearch office manager Cheryl Lawless said she is hoping the organization’s fifth trip to Aruba will be its last. She said the venture would not be possible without the help of Schaefer, Silvetti and the other local companies.

“Nothing is being done to gain name recognition. This is to help these people,” Silvetti said. “Most of us have watched this on television, and I can only imagine the horror any parent would go through searching for their child in a foreign country.”



jen ... thank you.

The impression given by the above article was that the Persistence undertaking was all about searching for Natalee Holloway remains.

If the undertaking was all about Natalee Holloway ... in the preparation stages ... agreed guidelines should have been established with Aruba in regards to the chain of custody if any discover appeared to be case related.

How many who have followed the Natalee Holloway case would have donated to the cause if the understanding was that John Silvetti was going to turn what could possibly be case related evidence over to the Aruban without so much as taking a photo.

How many who have followed the Natalee Holloway case would have donated to the cause if they had know there was not to be an FBI ******* on board the Persistence when the chain of custody took place?

How many who have followed the Natalee Holloway case would have donated to the cause if they had known that John Silvetti has self-serving motives for assisting in the finale' to the great Aruban coverup?

Janet


KYLE KINGSMAN - IN HIS OWN WORDS

Kyle:
  I get done in the survey room backing up the ROV dive and head to the back deck to talk to the Polis divers and see what they sampled and see the Polis boat way in the distance heading away fast. John doesn't seem concerned at all, but I am very dissapointed, concerned, and burning inside because I have a feeling that I/we will never know what they took from the trap. That evening I talked to John asking when we plan on recovering the trap. Previously this was part of the talks and plan, but this time he doesn't seem concerned about ever looking into the trap further. After John verbally BASHED me about the trap for what I said to Tim Miller about the sand body-form and that I believed her skirt was under the sand, John pretty much committed himself to the belief the trap wasn't what we were after. This shocked me because it was exactly what we were looking for- a fish trap lost at sea with human remains.


Kyle:  John is not a believer in the trap. He took ALE's word as gospel that it wasn't case related, yet never studied the videos or bothered to inquire further. He had plans on doing business with Aruba and in S. America and he didn't want to hurt any feelings by talks hinting at lack of complete trust and friendship.


private eye
Re: Natalee Case Discussion #746 4/4
« Reply #499 on: April 09, 2008, 12:39:50 AM »


If I understood Kyle correctly, and that would be that the Arubans retrieved and possessed all finds, not sharing anything with the crew, then that effort was a waste of time and effort. The only thing it could have accomplished was to locate additional evidence for the Arubans to destroy.  The effort was superb, but the game was fixed.

http://scaredmonkeys.net/index.php?topic=2769.msg372245;topicseen#msg372245


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #793 1/13/09
Post by: Keepthefaith on January 15, 2009, 03:33:32 PM
KTF,  I know the discussion has moved from Taco, but I was just lost in Google and found an article describing his most recent client.    ::MonkeyRoll::   Note:  Las Vegas comes into play, here:

http://www.examiner.com/a-1792578~Fla__judge_accused_of_hiding_assets_for_stripper.html

Interesting where Taco ends up to say the least! ::MonkeyCool::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #793 1/13/09
Post by: nonesuche on January 15, 2009, 03:34:06 PM
KTF,  I know the discussion has moved from Taco, but I was just lost in Google and found an article describing his most recent client.    ::MonkeyRoll::   Note:  Las Vegas comes into play, here:

http://www.examiner.com/a-1792578~Fla__judge_accused_of_hiding_assets_for_stripper.html

Looks like Taco continues to find his comfort zone with the bottom feeders.....birds of a feather.

Another corrupt judge except this time he's blaming the judge.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #793 1/13/09
Post by: Tamikosmom on January 15, 2009, 03:51:43 PM
Breaking News >> Report: Plane Crashes in Hudson River Off Manhattan

http://www.foxnews.com/



US Airways flight 1549 goes down in Hudson River

http://www.cnn.com/



Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #793 1/13/09
Post by: WhiskeyGirl on January 15, 2009, 04:25:40 PM
Any update on Kalpoe and Dr. Phil? 

Maybe keeping the case open is just a legal move to keep the Kalpoe case in California open? 

Avoid allowing access to the case file? 

Avoid the assignment of a special "Dutch" cold case crime investigator/reporter I've read about over the years to take another look at the investigation?


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #793 1/13/09
Post by: bleachedblack on January 15, 2009, 04:26:47 PM
Breaking News >> Report: Plane Crashes in Hudson River Off Manhattan

http://www.foxnews.com/



US Airways flight 1549 goes down in Hudson River

http://www.cnn.com/



Yep don't see any people at this time. Approx 140-150 passengers aboard enroute to Charlotte. Plane is mostly submerged except tail and nose and drifting south with the current in the river.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #793 1/13/09
Post by: jen3560 on January 15, 2009, 04:35:16 PM
from cnn:

Emergency officials are responding to a downed plane in New York's Hudson River. The FAA confirmed US Airways Flight 1549 was down in the river after a failed takeoff. Coast Guard units were responding, and a ferry on site was dropping life jackets into the water. A police source said the pilot radioed that he had experienced a bird strike. "I think everyone made it off," a passenger told CNN.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #793 1/13/09
Post by: bleachedblack on January 15, 2009, 04:37:02 PM
Appears everyone has gotten off the plane safe. Divers are taking a second look through the plane-Airbus 320. Ambulances are transporting all to the recovered to hospitals for treatment of hypothermia. Appears at this time that the plane flew into a flock of geese which disabled both engines.

Sorry for the OT....back to our regularly scheduled program. ::MonkeyWink::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #793 1/13/09
Post by: Tamikosmom on January 15, 2009, 04:39:09 PM
jen ... EVERYBODY (148) made it off safely and ... relatively uninjured.

It really is a miracle.

The plane has now sunked.  However ... the landing was perfect and ... private as well as ferries were on the scene immediately.  The ferries all had life jacket.

Apparently .... almost immediately after takeoff ... the plane hit a large flock of birds and ... some were sucked up the engines causing complete entine fairlaure.

I was crying while one of the passengers was being interviewed.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #793 1/13/09
Post by: finngirl on January 15, 2009, 04:40:32 PM

msnbc: all aboard rescued:
148 passengers/5-6 crew members

nearby hospital: approx 40 people enroute

plane is now sinking

eyewitnesses said plane made "perfect" landing ...
on the river

 :cool: :wink:



Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #793 1/13/09
Post by: WhiskeyGirl on January 15, 2009, 04:45:39 PM
I keep seeing and hearing Aruba come up in news reports and advertisements.  Has anyone been there recently?  Is tourism up?

There is also a new thread -
"Travel Show Boycott - Jan 31 - Feb 1 - St. Louis Travel Show - St. Louis, MO"

Any other boycotts?

It seems odd after all these years that Aruba still has the stigma of boycott attached to their island.

Bonaire survived their recent crime and I do not remember any calls for a boycott.  I don't recall any calls for a boycott of any other place.  Is Aruba still leading the boycott pack?

Anyone know of other places being boycotted?  Negative publicity?


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #793 1/13/09
Post by: bleachedblack on January 15, 2009, 04:48:07 PM
I keep seeing and hearing Aruba come up in news reports and advertisements.  Has anyone been there recently?  Is tourism up?

There is also a new thread -
"Travel Show Boycott - Jan 31 - Feb 1 - St. Louis Travel Show - St. Louis, MO"

Any other boycotts?

It seems odd after all these years that Aruba still has the stigma of boycott attached to their island.

Bonaire survived their recent crime and I do not remember any calls for a boycott.  I don't recall any calls for a boycott of any other place.  Is Aruba still leading the boycott pack?

Anyone know of other places being boycotted?  Negative publicity?

It is high season there- and tourism is down.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #793 1/13/09
Post by: jen3560 on January 15, 2009, 04:51:20 PM
jen ... EVERYBODY (148) made it off safely and ... relatively uninjured.

It really is a miracle.

The plane has now sunked.  However ... the landing was perfect and ... private as well as ferries were on the scene immediately.  The ferries all had life jacket.

Apparently .... almost immediately after takeoff ... the plane hit a large flock of birds and ... some were sucked up the engines causing complete entine fairlaure.

I was crying while one of the passengers was being interviewed.

Thanks Janet.

How frightening that had to be for everyone on board.

That pilot deserves to be commended for that landing!


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #793 1/13/09
Post by: Blonde on January 15, 2009, 05:03:24 PM
(http://i18.photobucket.com/albums/b104/Blondeonahd/In%20the%20News/capt1584c55b93a64b6fbc7957aa435b93c.jpg)
O/T
Plane crashes in NYC river after bird cuts engines (AP)
This video frame grab image taken from WNBC-TV shows a US Airways aircraft that has gone down in the Hudson River in New York, Thursday Jan. 15, 2009. It was not immediately clear if there were injuries.
All Passengers were taken off and all are OK


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #793 1/13/09
Post by: 2NJSons_Mom on January 15, 2009, 05:03:46 PM
jen ... EVERYBODY (148) made it off safely and ... relatively uninjured.

It really is a miracle.

The plane has now sunked.  However ... the landing was perfect and ... private as well as ferries were on the scene immediately.  The ferries all had life jacket.

Apparently .... almost immediately after takeoff ... the plane hit a large flock of birds and ... some were sucked up the engines causing complete entine fairlaure.

I was crying while one of the passengers was being interviewed.

Thanks Janet.

How frightening that had to be for everyone on board.

That pilot deserves to be commended for that landing!

Yes, the crew & ferry system....DH & I have been watching since they started reporting.  Thank God for all.  I asked DH if he'd want to board another plane to get home after something like that...he said 'No....well, maybe after several beers.' 



Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #793 1/13/09
Post by: 2NJSons_Mom on January 15, 2009, 05:07:47 PM
KTF,  I know the discussion has moved from Taco, but I was just lost in Google and found an article describing his most recent client.    ::MonkeyRoll::   Note:  Las Vegas comes into play, here:

http://www.examiner.com/a-1792578~Fla__judge_accused_of_hiding_assets_for_stripper.html

Looks like Taco continues to find his comfort zone with the bottom feeders.....birds of a feather.

Another corrupt judge except this time he's blaming the judge.

Those were my thoughts, exactly.  Dirty cops, murderers & the like. 


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #793 1/13/09
Post by: Edward on January 15, 2009, 05:08:35 PM
Nice landing and nice save of all the people on board in cold waters..  ::MonkeyDance::



Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #793 1/13/09
Post by: DPJ on January 15, 2009, 05:29:55 PM
I keep seeing and hearing Aruba come up in news reports and advertisements.  Has anyone been there recently?  Is tourism up?

I was in Aruba in December for a job interview and tourism surely wasn't up.
Probably mainly because of the current economic crisis though.

The fact that you see and hear Aruba in news and advertisements is because AHATA is spending millions extra nowadays I think.



Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #793 1/13/09
Post by: texasmom on January 15, 2009, 06:00:28 PM
1/15/2009 Bondia

The mother of Miss Aruba Diane Croes, died this week from symptoms believed to be dengue; now her father is hospitalized since yesterday with similar symptoms.

http://www.bondia.com/index.php?option=com_flippingbook&book_id=2

(http://i21.photobucket.com/albums/b258/texasmom55/Misc%20News%204/01152009Bondia02a-1.jpg)

http://www.bondia.com/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=3522&Itemid=1

Papiamentu translation:

docternan yesterday owing to interna casa of madam cu owing to fayece posiblemente of dengue thursday, 15 january 2009 oranjestad – yesterday afternoon the father of miss aruba diane croes owing to stay interna in hospital cu sintoma of thing is look like of is the ailment of dengue.  this owing to stay confirma for boss of dienst besmettelijke ziekte, esta drs sharlene koolman at good morning aruba. the motibo of the pace here was more bien because; precausion for cu the salud of the person, mirando cu one day day anterior his casa q.e.p.d. owing to fayece of thing can is one result of dengue hemorargico. good morning aruba owing to compronde of the famianan of sr croes cu his situation is enough earnest y cu they're tratando sr croes cu all cu have for her surpasa the momentonan dificil here. father of miss aruba diane croes one rumor cu was core one day anterior cu will have 4 caso of dengue hemorargico in hospital, also owing to stay desmenti. have casonan if yesterday cu owing to interna some person cu dengue, of cual had some child, but do not caso much earnest. the autopsia on madam croes did take lugar yesterday also y now have cu keep on the result of the muestranan cu owing to send for the netherlands for wordo examina. the motibo cu the is tarda so much (3 siman) is because have to isola the virus, y the virus have cu broei. the do not one proceso cu is take lugar today for mayan but cu the have his caminda for march. esey is rekeri the time of 3 week. if resulta cu sra croes enberdad owing to die of dengue, this do not change the maneho of dbz, according koolman owing to splica good morning aruba. owing to splica cu the desicion is cu they're trate because; one ‘textbook case’. all caso is one caso special, although cu have indicacion cu will do not one caso earnest of dengue. thing also owing to stay desbarata, is cu none instant have dearth of material for her.o. fliet y combati dengue. had rumornan persistente cu the material will owing to end, y cu minister encarga booshi wever will not can or wanted owing to company for more wordo busca. this absolutely do not berdad, according koolman because they owing to averigua y have material sufficient for one year largo. self instant have one politica cu if dado caso the end self, can have one form of emergencia for achieve coin urgente of financien for send busca more if have to. in oranan of nightfall late minister booshi wever also owing to desmenti the informacion eroneo at good morning aruba indicando cu none instant past owing to deny of company none paper, y cu have sufficient material for combati dengue, or as the fliet, for one period of at least one year. for thing is the cantidad of melding extra come across, koolman owing to confirma cu the cantidad of ‘meldingnan’ cu owing to enter at they departamento yesterday owing to aumenta drasticamente compara cu tuesday hour cu already end they owing to stay invadi cu one cantidad of call of preocupacion for atende they cas cu will have eventual caso of brote of dengue. docternan also owing to cuminsa calling dbz where cu they're raporta more caso also of dengue. according koolman, is lastima cu one caso as one dead of possible cause of dengue have cu take lugar for hendenan can reacciona. owing to ripara cu now hendenan is one bit more conciente y is see now con earnest one situation so can is. do not so cu one sangura can is so ‘inofensivo’ but cu is show con earnest one situation so can is. the is wait for cu one caso so will help concientisa the comunidad for so evita cu have casonan so in future, because the is one caso much lamentable cu not have to owing to arrive so far. have to evita type of cosnan so. the unique prevencion cu can haci is for evita criadero. can spuit cuanto cu wanted, but if not haci nothing at the criadero, the situation is stay same. koolman is splica again cu if not clean the bakinan cu larve, can saca water for of baki y pochi, but if the fill cu water, the larve is go back broei y crea sangura of dengue. pesey is important for her criadero completo wordo atendi because; owe being. come across


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #793 1/13/09
Post by: 2NJSons_Mom on January 15, 2009, 06:13:02 PM
I keep seeing and hearing Aruba come up in news reports and advertisements.  Has anyone been there recently?  Is tourism up?

I was in Aruba in December for a job interview and tourism surely wasn't up.
Probably mainly because of the current economic crisis though.

The fact that you see and hear Aruba in news and advertisements is because AHATA is spending millions extra nowadays I think.



I posted about a new series of ads on TV lately and later found that AHATA or ATA had hired Lewis Black for this ad campaign.  I have only seen a couple of them on ABC and perhaps a cable network.  They just released them to local stations this month.  I would imagine they spent big bucks on them but to me they are not worth whatever it was. 

How was the job interview?   ::MonkeyEek::   


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #793 1/13/09
Post by: bleachedblack on January 15, 2009, 06:17:09 PM
Things have been fairly wet there also, so things are greener than usual -but hence the dengue fever. I have heard the mosquitoes are pretty bad there as of late. Dengue seems to have cyclical recurrences there and since I believe 2006 has been increasing. Few cases are hemorrhagic dengue which some areas of the world experience- but still apparently deadly as
this last case demonstrates. Can't be good for tourism. There are no known immunizations against dengue.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #793 1/13/09
Post by: Keepthefaith on January 15, 2009, 06:26:05 PM
Random questions.How did Kyle get work over in Norway,as well as Egypt?


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #793 1/13/09
Post by: DPJ on January 15, 2009, 06:28:12 PM
I posted about a new series of ads on TV lately and later found that AHATA or ATA had hired Lewis Black for this ad campaign.  I have only seen a couple of them on ABC and perhaps a cable network.  They just released them to local stations this month.  I would imagine they spent big bucks on them but to me they are not worth whatever it was. 

How was the job interview?   ::MonkeyEek::   
That airtime was most probably bought before the crisis hit so very expensive too, so who knows what good it might do for them.

The interview was a piece of cake, they need someone to do the research and I need to do it in the Caribbean.
But unless the circumstances are as I want them to be, it doesn't have to be Aruba.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #793 1/13/09
Post by: bleachedblack on January 15, 2009, 06:28:50 PM
Aruba Tourism Authority returns as supporting sponsor for 2009 Boston Globe Travel Show

January 15, 2009
http://www.forimmediaterelease.net/pm/2147.html


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #793 1/13/09
Post by: 2NJSons_Mom on January 15, 2009, 06:35:45 PM
Random questions.How did Kyle get work over in Norway,as well as Egypt?

Pipelines....oil projects?  It's what he does.

http://www.geosolutions.blogspot.com/


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #793 1/13/09
Post by: 2NJSons_Mom on January 15, 2009, 06:37:24 PM
BBL...life duties are calling.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #793 1/13/09
Post by: Keepthefaith on January 15, 2009, 06:40:54 PM
Random questions.How did Kyle get work over in Norway,as well as Egypt?

Pipelines....oil projects?  It's what he does.

http://www.geosolutions.blogspot.com/

How did he get the work.Through himself,Silvetti,Schaeffer?


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #793 1/13/09
Post by: Nut44x4 on January 15, 2009, 07:37:36 PM
bastibro ...... I moved your Gaza post to Politics
http://scaredmonkeys.net/index.php?topic=4404.msg628715#msg628715


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #793 1/13/09
Post by: Anna on January 15, 2009, 07:39:50 PM
Random questions.How did Kyle get work over in Norway,as well as Egypt?

Pipelines....oil projects?  It's what he does.

http://www.geosolutions.blogspot.com/

How did he get the work.Through himself,Silvetti,Schaeffer?


I don't know but did note with interest that the search was originally expected to last only a couple of weeks.

Were they perhaps contacted about other possibilities once they were there?  I am thinking of the off shore enterprises between Russia and Venezuela.

Does anyone know the policy, official, on doing business with Russia right now?  It it open for all types of commerce?

Just wondering.



Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #793 1/13/09
Post by: ldstlou on January 15, 2009, 07:58:59 PM
I keep seeing and hearing Aruba come up in news reports and advertisements.  Has anyone been there recently?  Is tourism up?

I was in Aruba in December for a job interview and tourism surely wasn't up.
Probably mainly because of the current economic crisis though.

The fact that you see and hear Aruba in news and advertisements is because AHATA is spending millions extra nowadays I think.



They do seem to have a marketing blitz going on. All the more reason to support the protests at the Travel Shows. One coming up here in St Louis and one in California. Vicki will have a list of the shows in other areas that Aruba will attend. It is a small way to make a big difference and remind vacationers that Natalee still has not received justice.

No Justice For Natalee, No Tourists For Aruba


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #793 1/13/09
Post by: Tamikosmom on January 15, 2009, 07:59:11 PM
jen ... EVERYBODY (148) made it off safely and ... relatively uninjured.

It really is a miracle.

The plane has now sunked.  However ... the landing was perfect and ... private as well as ferries were on the scene immediately.  The ferries all had life jacket.

Apparently .... almost immediately after takeoff ... the plane hit a large flock of birds and ... some were sucked up the engines causing complete entine fairlaure.

I was crying while one of the passengers was being interviewed.

Thanks Janet.

How frightening that had to be for everyone on board.

That pilot deserves to be commended for that landing!

Yes, the crew & ferry system....DH & I have been watching since they started reporting.  Thank God for all.  I asked DH if he'd want to board another plane to get home after something like that...he said 'No....well, maybe after several beers.' 


I hate flying.  I can count the number of times I have flown on two hands and ... each time it was only as a means to an end.  It was far from enjoyable.  I was not even relieved when I arrived at my destination because I knew there was the return flight awaiting me.

My son-in-law is a pilot and ... for the past 13 years the only way I cope is just not thinking about it.

This coming Monday ... daughter, SIL and all four grandkids are flying to Disneyworld in Orlando, Florida.

 ::MonkeyWaa::

Daughter invited hubby and I to join them this year.  We declined.  I should say ... "I" declined for us.

Janet




Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #793 1/13/09
Post by: sharon on January 15, 2009, 08:38:05 PM
I keep seeing and hearing Aruba come up in news reports and advertisements.  Has anyone been there recently?  Is tourism up?

There is also a new thread -
"Travel Show Boycott - Jan 31 - Feb 1 - St. Louis Travel Show - St. Louis, MO"

Any other boycotts?

It seems odd after all these years that Aruba still has the stigma of boycott attached to their island.

Bonaire survived their recent crime and I do not remember any calls for a boycott.  I don't recall any calls for a boycott of any other place.  Is Aruba still leading the boycott pack?

Anyone know of other places being boycotted?  Negative publicity?

It is high season there- and tourism is down.

What GREAT news!

AVOID ARUBA AS IF YOUR LIFE DEPENDS ON IT...IT DOES!!!
Justice for Natalee Holloway
Peace for her family and loved ones


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #793 1/13/09
Post by: bleachedblack on January 15, 2009, 08:51:17 PM
I keep seeing and hearing Aruba come up in news reports and advertisements.  Has anyone been there recently?  Is tourism up?

There is also a new thread -
"Travel Show Boycott - Jan 31 - Feb 1 - St. Louis Travel Show - St. Louis, MO"

Any other boycotts?

It seems odd after all these years that Aruba still has the stigma of boycott attached to their island.

Bonaire survived their recent crime and I do not remember any calls for a boycott.  I don't recall any calls for a boycott of any other place.  Is Aruba still leading the boycott pack?

Anyone know of other places being boycotted?  Negative publicity?

It is high season there- and tourism is down.

What GREAT news!

AVOID ARUBA AS IF YOUR LIFE DEPENDS ON IT...IT DOES!!!
Justice for Natalee Holloway
Peace for her family and loved ones

http://www.aruba-bb.com/viewtopic.php?f=11&t=66068


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #793 1/13/09
Post by: sharon on January 15, 2009, 09:21:35 PM

http://www.aruba-bb.com/viewtopic.php?f=11&t=66068

Awesome bb!

Thanks for posting that  ::MonkeyCool::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #793 1/13/09
Post by: Tamikosmom on January 15, 2009, 09:28:32 PM
I keep seeing and hearing Aruba come up in news reports and advertisements.  Has anyone been there recently?  Is tourism up?

There is also a new thread -
"Travel Show Boycott - Jan 31 - Feb 1 - St. Louis Travel Show - St. Louis, MO"

Any other boycotts?

It seems odd after all these years that Aruba still has the stigma of boycott attached to their island.

Bonaire survived their recent crime and I do not remember any calls for a boycott.  I don't recall any calls for a boycott of any other place.  Is Aruba still leading the boycott pack?

Anyone know of other places being boycotted?  Negative publicity?

It is high season there- and tourism is down.

 ::cartwheel::

What GREAT news!

AVOID ARUBA AS IF YOUR LIFE DEPENDS ON IT...IT DOES!!!
Justice for Natalee Holloway
Peace for her family and loved ones

http://www.aruba-bb.com/viewtopic.php?f=11&t=66068


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #793 1/13/09
Post by: Tamikosmom on January 15, 2009, 09:29:19 PM


http://www.aruba-bb.com/viewtopic.php?f=11&t=66068

 ::cartwheel::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #793 1/13/09
Post by: Tamikosmom on January 15, 2009, 09:30:15 PM
Nut

I messed up again.  I apologize.  Please delete post 319.

Thanks

Janet


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #793 1/13/09
Post by: bleachedblack on January 15, 2009, 09:42:45 PM
You're welcome Sharon.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #793 1/13/09
Post by: SuzieQ on January 15, 2009, 09:53:15 PM
Found this on that forum also.

Croes Maybe The First Fatality Of The Dengue Virus In 2009



Miss Aruba 2008, Diane Croes

ORANJESTAD-Angelica Croes mother of the current Miss Aruba Diane Croes suddenly passed away
at the age of 53 on Tuesday afternoon. Angelica Croes is teacher at San Jose high school in Santa
Cruz. Blood tests still have to determine the cause of death of Angelica Croes, the results are
expected within 2 weeks. Doctors on the island are suspecting dengue, a virus transmitted by the
Aedes Aegypti mosquito to humans through a mosquito bite.

The sudden death of Angelica Croes has shocked Aruba, and has hit the Croes family hard. The
Aruba Health Organization is on high alert for the dengue virus, and is warning the community to
get rid of standing water in the yard which serve as breeding grounds for mosquitoes. The Croes
family had big plans to travel together with their daughter to Las Vegas, Nevada. Las Vegas is the
host city of the Miss Universe 2009 pageant that will be held in July.

http://www.aruba-bb.com/viewtopic.php?f=11&t=66907&view=next










Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #793 1/13/09
Post by: 2NJSons_Mom on January 15, 2009, 10:06:53 PM
Random questions.How did Kyle get work over in Norway,as well as Egypt?

Pipelines....oil projects?  It's what he does.

http://www.geosolutions.blogspot.com/

How did he get the work.Through himself,Silvetti,Schaeffer?

He had his own company, now seems to be working for another (not sure it it's his or another's).   :smt102


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #793 1/13/09
Post by: Anna on January 15, 2009, 10:52:26 PM
I don't believe that Aruba participates in reporting cases of infectious disease as to most other countries in the world.

This is the latest global report on Dengue and still no mention of any cases at all in Aruba.  Maybe they don't want tourist or potential tourists to know about it.

Quote:

Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2009 03:19:48 -0500 (EST)
From: ProMED-mail <promed@promed.isid.harvard.edu>
Subject: PRO/EDR> Dengue/DHF update 2009 (02)

DENGUE/DHF UPDATE 2009 (02)
***************************
A ProMED-mail post
<http://www.promedmail.org>
ProMED-mail is a program of the
International Society for Infectious Diseases
<http://www.isid.org>

[1] Bolivia (Amazon Region)
[2] Brazil (Rio de Janeiro)
[3] Paraguay
[4] Australia (Queensland)

******
[1] Bolivia (Amazon Region)
Date: Mon 5 Jan 2009
Source: Pueblo en Linea [Spanish, trans. & summ. Mod.TY, edited]
<http://spanish.peopledaily.com.cn/31614/6567271.html>


A dengue outbreak has occurred in the Bolivian Amazon region, with numerous
individuals infected, according to information revealed in a report issued
by the Ministry of Public Health. This bad epidemic has spread in Beni and
Pando departments [state or province equivalents], with 450 and 100 cases
respectively, including 4 patients with confirmed DHF.

Government [units] at diverse levels have mobilized the local inhabitants
to take preventive measures against the current dengue outbreak, which has
been caused by torrential rains and floods which have battered the region.

- --
communicated by:
ProMED-PORT <promed@promedmail.org>

[On 14 Nov 2008, ProMED-mail posted a report (archive no. 20081118.3636)
showing that there were 17 dengue cases in Cobija, the capital city of
Pando department. The above report indicates that there have now been 100
cases in that department, and an additional 450 cases in neighboring Beni
department.

A map of Bolivia showing Beni and Pando departments can be accessed at
<http://www.lib.utexas.edu/maps/americas/bolivia_pol93.jpg>. - Mod.TY]

******
[2] Brazil (Rio de Janeiro)
Date: Sun 11 Jan 2009
Source: International Herald Tribune [edited]
<http://www.iht.com/articles/ap/2009/01/11/news/LT-Brazil-Dengue.php>


Brazilian authorities say deaths from dengue fever in Rio de Janeiro nearly
quadrupled last year [2008] to 106. Government news service Agencia Brasil
says a city Health Secretariat report also notes 87 more deaths under
investigation that could be linked to dengue.

Agencia Brasil says 127 000 people in the city were sickened [by dengue]
last year [2008], up from 25 000 in 2007. It did not report a possible
cause, and Secretariat officials could not be reached Sunday [11 Jan 2009].

Dengue killed 27 people in 2007 in Rio, which is one of the Brazilian
cities most affected by the mosquitoborne [virus] disease. Dengue [virus
infection] causes high fever, severe headaches, and joint pain. Most cases
are not fatal, but the more virulent, deadly strain has been reported more
frequently.

- --
communicated by:
ProMED-mail <promed@promedmail.org>

[One hopes that there will not be a renewed dengue outbreak in Brazil, and
especially in Rio, as severe as that of 2008. ProMED-PORT posted a similar
report in Portuguese from ComuniWeb dated 10 Jan 2009
<http://www.comuniweb.com.br/?idpaginas=20&idmaterias=390883>, indicating
that there were 330 dengue cases in December 2008, raising concern that the
dengue outbreak might revive with the onset of warmer weather.

A HealthMap/ProMED-mail interactive map of Brazil can be accessed at
<http://healthmap.org/promed/en?v=-10.8,-53.1,4>. - Mod.TY]

******
[3] Paraguay
Date: Mon 12 Jan 2009
Source: El Litoral [Spanish, trans. & summ. Mod.TY, edited]
<http://www.el-litoral.com.ar/leer_noticia.asp?IdNoticia=102134>


As of yesterday [11 Jan 2009] in Asuncion, Paraguay, there was just one
case of dengue, but meanwhile there are 10 suspected cases at the moment.
In respect to dengue, the Minister of Public Health, Esperanza Martinez,
assured the public that the degree of public work being carried out to
combat the breeding sites of _Aedes aegypti_, the mosquito vector [of
dengue virus], will prevent dengue this year [2009] from reaching the
alarming levels it has in previous years, including when it has caused
epidemics.

In communication with Radio Nanduti, the Secretariat of State explained
that the drought occurring now will halt expansion of mosquito breeding
sites [assuming that the populace has not increased water storage in their
houses, which would provide _Aedes_ breeding sites - Mod.TY].

He indicated, also, that the [number] of [dengue] cases that might occur
are within the range expected by health authorities. "We do not have an
alarming situation such as we have had in previous years," the official
indicated. Martinez indicated that the [dengue] program of his job focuses
as a priority on the period up to March, the month in which summer ends and
high temperatures accompanied by rains begin to slowly ease.

We are intensifying the dengue program so that citizens will constantly do
surveillance and be aware that mosquito control is a responsibility of
citizens and families, stated the public health head. He explained that
health workers do random controls neighborhood by neighborhood, and in
those neighborhoods where there is a high rate of [_Aedes_] infestation,
measures will be intensified. Also, there will be active searches for
febrile cases. He also insisted that citizens report suspected [dengue]
cases to the closest health centers. He recalled that in 2008, 1200
laboratory tests yielded 16 confirmed [dengue] cases.

- --
communicated by:
ProMED-mail <promed@promedmail.org>

[A HealthMap/ProMED-mail interactive map of Paraguay can be accessed at
<http://healthmap.org/promed/en?v=-23.2,-58.4,5>. - Mod.TY]

******
[4] Australia (Queensland)
Date: Sun 11 Jan 2009
Source: Bloomberg.com [edited]
<http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601080&sid=aqmeci_sfpAo&refer=asia>


Dengue sickened more than 100 people in north eastern Australia, marking
the worst outbreak of the potentially lethal mosquitoborne disease since
2004. In Cairns, Queensland state, 97 people were ill, while 350 km (218
miles) south in Townsville, an unrelated outbreak of a different strain of
the virus struck 6 people, said Brian Montgomery, a senior medical
entomologist with Queensland Health. More than 10 people have been
hospitalized, though none has died, he said. An outbreak in 2003 and 2004
struck almost 900 people, killing one.

Health officials are concerned the 2 outbreaks may merge, raising the risk
that the epidemic will turn deadly. While people infected with one type of
dengue develop lifelong immunity to that virus, studies have shown
subsequent infection with a different strain makes a person more
susceptible to a complication called dengue hemorrhagic fever, which can kill.

The Cairns outbreak of type 3 of the [dengue] virus began after a resident
infected in Kalimantan, Indonesia returned to the city, Montgomery said.
Townsville's [dengue virus] type-1 outbreak has been traced to Singapore,
he said. Hot, humid weather and rainfall in the region has helped the
_Aedes aegypti_ mosquito species, which spreads dengue [virus], to breed
more than normally for this time of year, Montgomery said.

"We still have ideal weather patterns at the moment for prolific _Aedes
aegypti_ breeding, and we have dengue in more areas of Cairns than we can
respond to comprehensively," he said. "We're bracing ourselves for an
outbreak which could persist to April or May [2009]."

Health workers have laid more than 2000 traps in homes around Cairns and
local authorities are issuing fines of AUD 375 (USD 264) to households that
fail to clear mosquito-breeding sites from their yards, Montgomery said.

Symptoms include high fever, headaches, joint and muscle pain, vomiting and
rashes. Usually, people with dengue recover within 2 weeks, according to
the United States National Institutes of Health (NIH). The infection can be
fatal when it turns into dengue hemorrhagic fever, which causes bleeding
from the nose, gums or under the skin, or dengue shock syndrome, which
causes massive bleeding and shock, according to NIH. There are no drugs or
vaccine for the disease.

[byline: Simeon Bennett]

- --
communicated by:
ProMED-mail <promed@promedmail.org>

[The number of dengue cases in Cairns has increased from 52 as of 24 Dec
2008 (archive no. 20090105.0041) to over 100 reported above. Reducing
_Aedes aegypti_ breeding sites quickly is a challenge, since it relies
heavily on community participation, in this case reinforced by fines for
households that do not comply. This will doubtless not be the last
importation of dengue virus into Queensland. In a report kindly sent to
ProMED-mail by Dr Thomas Coombs that appeared in Cairns.com (byline: Damon
Guppy) <http://www.cairns.com.au/article/2008/12/30/21495_local-news.html>,
Tropical Health Population Services' senior director Brad McCulloch said
many dengue virus-infected people arrive at Cairns airport but that the
current outbreak was fueled by perfect conditions for the virus vector to
thrive, a mixture of steady rain, heat and humidity. "We get about a dozen
dengue imports each year," he said.

Dengue vaccines are currently undergoing clinical trials in Thailand. Also,
The Australian of Sydney, Australia, in its 9 Jan 2009 edition
<http://www.theaustralian.news.com.au/story/0,25197,24891127-23289,00.html>,
reported that University of Queensland researchers have successfully
infected the _Aedes aegypti_ mosquito with a bacterium which halves the
insect's life span, reducing the opportunity for the virus to reach the
mosquito's salivary glands and be transmitted.

Cairns and Townsville can be located on the HealthMap/ProMED-mail
interactive map of Australia at
<http://healthmap.org/promed/en?g=2172797&g=2146142&v=-16.917,145.767,5>. -
Mod.TY]

[see also:
Dengue/DHF update 2009 (01) 20090105.0041
2008
- ---
Dengue/DHF update 2008 (56): Singapore, Australia 20081229.4097
Dengue/DHF update 2008 (55) 20081223.4042
Dengue/DHF update 2008 (54) 20081215.3942
Dengue/DHF update 2008 (52) 20081207.3840
Dengue/DHF update 2008 (50) 20081118.3636
Dengue/DHF update 2008 (40) 20080915.2891
Dengue/DHF update 2008 (30): Brazil 20080728.2305
Dengue/DHF update 2008 (20) 20080519.1668
Dengue/DHF update 2008 (10) 20080309.0962
Dengue/DHF update 2008 (01): Brazil 20080104.0052]

.......................dk/ty/msp/sh

------------------------------

End of ProMED Digest V2009 #19
******************************


--------

Not so much as a single case reported in Aruba.  ::MonkeyNoNo::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #793 1/13/09
Post by: texasmom on January 15, 2009, 10:59:49 PM
1/16/2009 Awe Mainta Front Page

http://awemainta.com/home/

(http://i21.photobucket.com/albums/b258/texasmom55/Misc%20News%204/01162009AweMaintaFP_1.jpg)

Papiamentu Translation:

another plantacion big of marihuana descubri yesterday morning, several unidad of police, provided that especial departamento of combatimento of narcotica owing to being send at one direccion at weg seroe blanco at san nicolas, where owing to descubri one plantacion very big self of marihuana. the plantacion of marihuana here more bien is in forest behind one cas. that is responsible p’e plantacion here, none person know still. consecuentemente none detencion not owing to cay niether, already as menciona, the plantacion here is in forest behind one cas at weg seroe blanco. all the matanan owing to stay confisca.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #793 1/13/09
Post by: Anna on January 15, 2009, 11:04:13 PM
Thoes plants appear all dehydrated and crooked.  Not at all like the prime specimens, picture perfect plants of Lorenzo. 

 ::MonkeyHaHa::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #793 1/13/09
Post by: texasmom on January 15, 2009, 11:08:15 PM
http://www.amigoe.com/artman/publish/artikel_51497.php

Google translation:

Research on dead by dengue
14 Jan, 2009, 15:46 (GMT -04:00)

  Email this article
  Print this article
 
ORANGE CITY - Department of Health has issued an urgent press conference Tuesday called for an "update" to have dengue, or dengue. The department has done this in response to the hundreds of calls that come in within its Health, after the media reported was a 53-year-old woman from dengue Casibari which would be deceased.

 
Trevor of Gellecum, Director of Public Health
According to Trevor Gellecum, Director of Health, it is still not clear that this woman is actually dengue is deceased. "First, there are certain tests are performed and it can take three weeks before the result has been," says Van Gellecum. "These tests should be in a laboratory carried out abroad."

According to Wilmer Salazar, microbiologist at Health, the woman had a fever at the weekend, but on Monday they all felt better and she went to her work. "Later that day she was taken to hospital in shock. At night she is deceased, "said Salazar. "Until now there is no confirmed diagnosis of the cause of death, but it is suspected that it was dengue. Today, an autopsy performed, the study abroad may take place. "

Maribel Tromp, management at the department of epidemiology and research of the Infectious Disease Food Service (DBZ) has indicated that so far 612 suspected cases of dengue have been registered. "Of these 218 cases confirmed as positive by the laboratory, and 394 are still under investigation, reports Tromp. "This does not mean that they are negative."   From the moment the news of a potentially fatal dengue victim arose late Charline Koolma, director of the Yellow Fever Muskieten Fight (GKMB) know that they are overwhelmed with calls from people reporting on possible family dengue reported or who want information about the disease. "It is good that we now call, but it had also previously been possible. This kind of extreme cases, can be avoided ", according Koolman.

"From November last year, the GKMB made several visits to check on breeding, and syringes. Often the residents are not home and then left behind a letter with a request to make contact with the GKMB for the disclosure of important information for us. But there is never called back until something bad happens and it is often too late. "
The more information and reports the GKMB gets, the better the service and the DBZ can do their work, said Tromp. Finally, all speakers called on the population and general practitioners to join forces for the multiplication of denguemug Aedes Aegypti beings. Health management is that the only way to prevent infection with dengue.

 ::MonkeyNoNo:: 


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #793 1/13/09
Post by: texasmom on January 15, 2009, 11:10:20 PM
Thoes plants appear all dehydrated and crooked.  Not at all like the prime specimens, picture perfect plants of Lorenzo. 

 ::MonkeyHaHa::

 ::MonkeyHaHa::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #793 1/13/09
Post by: wreck on January 15, 2009, 11:14:13 PM
Isn't that an alarming number for a country that size?? (approx. one in every 200 people )


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #793 1/13/09
Post by: klaasend on January 15, 2009, 11:20:10 PM
Thoes plants appear all dehydrated and crooked.  Not at all like the prime specimens, picture perfect plants of Lorenzo. 

 ::MonkeyHaHa::

I have it on good authority that everything in Aruba ends up looking like Renfro soon after reaching maturity.  I'm sure that's why these plants look so shriveled up.  ::MonkeyHaHa::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #793 1/13/09
Post by: Tamikosmom on January 15, 2009, 11:21:57 PM
Thoes plants appear all dehydrated and crooked.  Not at all like the prime specimens, picture perfect plants of Lorenzo. 

 ::MonkeyHaHa::

... or the ones in our back yard that my Father was cultivating with tender loving care until a neighbour told him those plants/weeds were not ferns.  My younger brother (17) was still at home at the time but ... to this day ... forty years later ... denies any knowledge of them.

 ::MonkeyHaHa::

GOOD NIGHT MONKEYS!!!  GOOD NIGHT ZOOKEEPERS!!!

Janet
8:30 PM PT


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #793 1/13/09
Post by: 2NJSons_Mom on January 15, 2009, 11:24:44 PM
Thoes plants appear all dehydrated and crooked.  Not at all like the prime specimens, picture perfect plants of Lorenzo. 

 ::MonkeyHaHa::

... or the ones in our back yard that my Father was cultivating with tender loving care until a neighbour told him those plants/weeds were not ferns.  My younger brother (17) was still at home at the time but ... to this day ... forty years later ... denies any knowledge of them.

 ::MonkeyHaHa::

GOOD NIGHT MONKEYS!!!  GOOD NIGHT ZOOKEEPERS!!!

Janet
8:30 PM PT
::MonkeyHaHa::  Well, now, that might explain the typos... ::MonkeyTongue::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #793 1/13/09
Post by: texasmom on January 15, 2009, 11:25:36 PM
1/16/2009 Awe Mainta Page 3

http://awemainta.com/home/

(http://i21.photobucket.com/albums/b258/texasmom55/Misc%20News%204/01162009AweMaintaPg3_1.jpg)

Papiamentu translation:

only 1% of person cu achieve dengue have chens of achieve fiebre hemoragico or shock syndrome dr. greg lacle, chairman of the staff medico of hospital owing to feel the necesidad for come cu cierto informacionnan tocante dengue, mirando the aumento y preocupacion big cu have in comunidad for cu this. have 4 various type of dengue y in casonan as of feburary 2005 for march 2006 tanatin one epidemia of dengue at aruba. is talk of epidemia hour 1 in cada 100 inhabitant is positive for her virus of dengue. at 2006 had 1642 patient cu dengue. at the momentonan here the cifranan confirma do not of the high ey, among 300 for 500. in 95% of the casonan dengue is sosode without sintomanan cu maybe dangerous. can achieve dengue by of the pica of the sangura muher cu is pica only in day y not night. the sangura here is esun cu do not haci the sonido fastioso (zumm). if owing to arrive of achieve dengue in pasado (inclusive if owing to haye without cu was know cu is 95% of the casonan) have chens cu if wordo infecta cu one another type of dengue, the chensnan is become more big for become more bad. prevencion of this is important. near of this dr. lacle is indica cu the sanguranan aedes aegypti (sangura of dengue) is let his webonan in water clean y not dirt. if have criaderonan y the water not can get rid of dje, can throw kerosin or gasoil in dje. for thing is the sintomanan, doctor greg lacle is splica cu the pacientnan cu have kentura, dolor of cabes, sacamento, dolor of joints, is esakinan more tanto is the casonan of dengue in the form sintomatico cu not have to atencion medico. the type of dengue here is bay on his self in 5 day for 2 week. in the caso here mihor is for stay cas, drink sufficient liquido y sosega. if the patient see cu the is birando suf or pik pik wine or cora at curpa, esey is one sintoma for cual have to bay doctor. this is the phase dangerous cu is 1% of the pacientnan cu is achieve dengue have chens for haye, y can achieve the fiebre hemoragico or the shock syndrome. esakinan is indicacion for patient wordo opgenomen in hospital.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #793 1/13/09
Post by: texasmom on January 15, 2009, 11:26:44 PM
Thoes plants appear all dehydrated and crooked.  Not at all like the prime specimens, picture perfect plants of Lorenzo. 

 ::MonkeyHaHa::

... or the ones in our back yard that my Father was cultivating with tender loving care until a neighbour told him those plants/weeds were not ferns.  My younger brother (17) was still at home at the time but ... to this day ... forty years later ... denies any knowledge of them.

 ::MonkeyHaHa::

GOOD NIGHT MONKEYS!!!  GOOD NIGHT ZOOKEEPERS!!!

Janet
8:30 PM PT

 ::MonkeyHaHa::

Goodnight Janet!   ::MonkeyCool::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #793 1/13/09
Post by: texasmom on January 15, 2009, 11:27:51 PM
Isn't that an alarming number for a country that size?? (approx. one in every 200 people )

It seemed like a lot to me wreck, and I figure there are a lot of cases that weren't reported too.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #793 1/13/09
Post by: texasmom on January 15, 2009, 11:28:45 PM
Thoes plants appear all dehydrated and crooked.  Not at all like the prime specimens, picture perfect plants of Lorenzo. 

 ::MonkeyHaHa::

I have it on good authority that everything in Aruba ends up looking like Renfro soon after reaching maturity.  I'm sure that's why these plants look so shriveled up.  ::MonkeyHaHa::

 ::MonkeyLaugh::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #793 1/13/09
Post by: Tamikosmom on January 15, 2009, 11:28:51 PM
Thoes plants appear all dehydrated and crooked.  Not at all like the prime specimens, picture perfect plants of Lorenzo. 

 ::MonkeyHaHa::

... or the ones in our back yard that my Father was cultivating with tender loving care until a neighbour told him those plants/weeds were not ferns.  My younger brother (17) was still at home at the time but ... to this day ... forty years later ... denies any knowledge of them.

 ::MonkeyHaHa::

GOOD NIGHT MONKEYS!!!  GOOD NIGHT ZOOKEEPERS!!!

Janet
8:30 PM PT
::MonkeyHaHa::  Well, now, that might explain the typos... ::MonkeyTongue::

  ::MonkeyTongue::

At ten years of age I attempted to take a puff of my mother's cigarette when she was not looking and ... just about choked to death when I sucked that tobacco stick like it was a straw.

The incident was a blessing in disguise.  I was never tempted to "smoke" anything.

 ::MonkeyHaHa::

Janet



Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #793 1/13/09
Post by: 2NJSons_Mom on January 15, 2009, 11:31:18 PM
Thoes plants appear all dehydrated and crooked.  Not at all like the prime specimens, picture perfect plants of Lorenzo. 

 ::MonkeyHaHa::

... or the ones in our back yard that my Father was cultivating with tender loving care until a neighbour told him those plants/weeds were not ferns.  My younger brother (17) was still at home at the time but ... to this day ... forty years later ... denies any knowledge of them.

 ::MonkeyHaHa::

GOOD NIGHT MONKEYS!!!  GOOD NIGHT ZOOKEEPERS!!!

Janet
8:30 PM PT
::MonkeyHaHa::  Well, now, that might explain the typos... ::MonkeyTongue::

  ::MonkeyTongue::

At ten years of age I attempted to take a puff of my mother's cigarette when she was not looking and ... just about choked to death when I sucked that tobacco stick like it was a straw.

The incident was a blessing in disguise.  I was never tempted to "smoke" anything.

 ::MonkeyHaHa::

Janet



Goodnight, Janet.  You know I was just kidding....I hope!!


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #793 1/13/09
Post by: Tamikosmom on January 15, 2009, 11:32:09 PM
Thoes plants appear all dehydrated and crooked.  Not at all like the prime specimens, picture perfect plants of Lorenzo. 

 ::MonkeyHaHa::

... or the ones in our back yard that my Father was cultivating with tender loving care until a neighbour told him those plants/weeds were not ferns.  My younger brother (17) was still at home at the time but ... to this day ... forty years later ... denies any knowledge of them.

 ::MonkeyHaHa::

GOOD NIGHT MONKEYS!!!  GOOD NIGHT ZOOKEEPERS!!!

Janet
8:30 PM PT
::MonkeyHaHa::  Well, now, that might explain the typos... ::MonkeyTongue::

  ::MonkeyTongue::

At ten years of age I attempted to take a puff of my mother's cigarette when she was not looking and ... just about choked to death when I sucked that tobacco stick like it was a straw.

The incident was a blessing in disguise.  I was never tempted to "smoke" anything.

 ::MonkeyHaHa::

Janet



Goodnight, Janet.  You know I was just kidding....I hope!!

Hugs

Janet


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #793 1/13/09
Post by: Anna on January 15, 2009, 11:32:25 PM
Isn't that an alarming number for a country that size?? (approx. one in every 200 people )

It is!  And even a poor country like Bolivia manages to report and cooperate with other countries in monitoring disease.

Aruba only seems to try to cover it all up.  I see a pattern to that.

 ::MonkeyNoNo::



Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #793 1/13/09
Post by: 2NJSons_Mom on January 15, 2009, 11:36:21 PM
Isn't that an alarming number for a country that size?? (approx. one in every 200 people )

It is!  And even a poor country like Bolivia manages to report and cooperate with other countries in monitoring disease.

Aruba only seems to try to cover it all up.  I see a pattern to that.

 ::MonkeyNoNo::



One happy island has a 'dengue' problem to add to their list....yep the pattern is not helping them.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #793 1/13/09
Post by: texasmom on January 15, 2009, 11:38:39 PM
Isn't that an alarming number for a country that size?? (approx. one in every 200 people )

It is!  And even a poor country like Bolivia manages to report and cooperate with other countries in monitoring disease.

Aruba only seems to try to cover it all up.  I see a pattern to that.

 ::MonkeyNoNo::


I agree Anna, I had that thought when I read this.... ::MonkeyRoll::

Seems to reason to me that if you have two likely cases in one home....there are MORE.

1/16/2009 Awe Mainta Page 4

http://awemainta.com/home/

contrario at various rumornan only have two patient cu suspicion of dengue in hospital mirando cu have one cantidad of rumor cu have very much patient cu dengue in hospital, owing to acerca the vocero bob harms for her comenta on this. past owing to desmenti the rumornan here totalmente y owing to tell cu at the momentonan here have two patient interna in hospital cu suspicion cu they have sintomanan of dengue. according bob harms, the sistema con hospital is hinca in another is so cu hour one patient present at departamento of emergencia cu sintomanan of griep, is deal the caso here in form standard, naturally looking at if the situation of the patient maybe one complicacion, in the caso here or if the patient owing to achieve the complicacion end is admiti’e at hospital. at instant of admision the responsabilidad of the doctor at departamento of emergencia is end y the patient is become responsabilidad of one specialista cu is cuminsa deal the patient. only under indicacion of one specialista can admiti or retira one patient for of hospital, bariendo for of table the rumornan also cu hospital on his self is mandando pacientnan cu dengue bek for cas.




Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #793 1/13/09
Post by: Anna on January 16, 2009, 12:04:22 AM
Epidemic

Ep`i*dem"ic\, Epidemical \Ep`i*dem"ic*al\, a. [L. epidemus, Gr. ?, ?, among the people, epidemic; ? in + ? people: cf. F. ['e]pid['e]mique. Cf. Demagogue.]

1. (Med.) Common to, or affecting at the same time, a large number in a community; -- applied to a disease which, spreading widely, attacks many persons at the same time; as, an epidemic disease; an epidemic catarrh, fever, etc. See Endemic.

2. Spreading widely, or generally prevailing; affecting great numbers, as an epidemic does; as, epidemic rage; an epidemic evil.

It was the epidemical sin of the nation. --Bp. Burnet.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #793 1/13/09
Post by: iris44 on January 16, 2009, 12:33:10 AM
Has there ever been a list compiled of all the major players, which lists their attorneys/law firms and/or CPA's/financial advisors to look for the connections?

Who is Lorenzo's attorney?  Any ties to Posner's?

Does anyone know how high Paulus' line of credit was/is at Posner's casino?  Who else of the Joran group is connected to Posner's hotel or casino?

Regarding the underage gambling, I remember my 13 year brother gambling in that casino (this was years ago) and he never was asked to leave.  We didn't even know he was in the casino, until the night he won and bought us all ice cream!  I guess my parents didn't supervise us very well.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #793 1/13/09
Post by: klaasend on January 16, 2009, 12:36:10 AM
Has there ever been a list compiled of all the major players, which lists their attorneys/law firms and/or CPA's/financial advisors to look for the connections?

Who is Lorenzo's attorney?  Any ties to Posner's?

Does anyone know how high Paulus' line of credit was/is at Posner's casino?  Who else of the Joran group is connected to Posner's hotel or casino?

Regarding the underage gambling, I remember my 13 year brother gambling in that casino (this was years ago) and he never was asked to leave.  We didn't even know he was in the casino, until the night he won and bought us all ice cream!  I guess my parents didn't supervise us very well.

Joran ?  Is that you?  j/k  ::MonkeyHaHa::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #793 1/13/09
Post by: iris44 on January 16, 2009, 12:37:36 AM



I believe Paulus and/or Joran must have mob ties proven by the fact that Tacopino was defending Joran.  There is no other explanation.


Iris and I are not on the same page often but ... on this I tend to agree.

Janet

++++++++

Janet, I agree with you on lots of things!  I probably just don't get inspired to post until I disagree!


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #793 1/13/09
Post by: texasmom on January 16, 2009, 02:31:15 AM
(http://i21.photobucket.com/albums/b258/texasmom55/Natalee/NataleeBethShadow1-1.gif)


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #793 1/13/09
Post by: sharon on January 16, 2009, 08:09:17 AM
Isn't that an alarming number for a country that size?? (approx. one in every 200 people )

It is!  And even a poor country like Bolivia manages to report and cooperate with other countries in monitoring disease.

Aruba only seems to try to cover it all up.  I see a pattern to that.

 ::MonkeyNoNo::



And it's NOT a new problem.

bb has been posting about this and the stats every year, iirc.

And yet  -- Aruba had not done anything to prevent the re-occurence  ::MonkeyNoNo::

I think I see a pattern there as well, Anna


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #793 1/13/09
Post by: sharon on January 16, 2009, 08:11:43 AM
klaas   ::MonkeyLaugh::

You were on a roll....... ::MonkeyDance::

Have a happy Friday Monkeys. Stay warm. When it is only 60 in Miami, I KNOW the rest of you must be freezing.

.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #793 1/13/09
Post by: Nut44x4 on January 16, 2009, 08:50:23 AM
MINUS -12 degrees BELOWwwwwwww Zerooooooo at 6am  ::MonkeyWaa::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #793 1/13/09
Post by: jen3560 on January 16, 2009, 08:52:29 AM
Anna,

You asked a question about the lenth of the Persistence search having been extended.

The time extenstion and larger grid area was due to Richardson saying they needed to search further out, in deeper waters.

This was right after they found the trap.

Silvetti had already turned his back on the trap by this point, and did what Richardson suggested - left the originally planned search area - and extended their grid into deeper waters further out. ::MonkeyConfused::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #793 1/13/09
Post by: BUCKSHOT on January 16, 2009, 11:00:02 AM
There may not be a clear cut answer to this question, but here goes:

Why would Aruba wait 2.5 years before addressing a body (in a cage) in the ocean?

(1) Was it just sloppy on their end?
(2) Did they feel it was safe there, but needed to move it upon an announced search?

I do not know the answer. Just a thought (out loud) ....


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #793 1/13/09
Post by: Edward on January 16, 2009, 11:19:24 AM
Sounds more and more like they just used Natalee tragic situation and a theory she was in the water to launch the persistence in order to not get the horns up on Hugo's head in Venezuela..
 They used Dave and Tim.. They played on there desperation..
For politics..For Oil.
A group with no souls. Driven by money.

What else is new..

They must have also interjected Marcos into the action..
"There has been a change in plans.." Disgusting people. 


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #793 1/13/09
Post by: Tamikosmom on January 16, 2009, 11:29:42 AM
Anna,

You asked a question about the lenth of the Persistence search having been extended.

The time extenstion and larger grid area was due to Richardson saying they needed to search further out, in deeper waters.

This was right after they found the trap.

Silvetti had already turned his back on the trap by this point, and did what Richardson suggested - left the originally planned search area - and extended their grid into deeper waters further out. ::MonkeyConfused::

KYLE KINGMAN - IN HIS OWN WORDS

Kyle:  I know Tim believed me and was convinced 100% which is why he went and told Dave that we found Natalee on Dec 29th. John stood back and waited and worked with the Aruban Polis to arrange the next dive -Dec 30th's which was the visual-only dive. John told me then he didn't want to hear me ever mention the trap again. Of course this didn't set well with me. After the Jan 7th Dive I got off the boat for R&R from the 9th-14th at the Holiday Inn. Remember after the Jan-7th dive which sampled the trap Richardson told John emphatically to "keep searching she's still out there in the deep ocean".  Meanwhile I'm standing on the beach watching the Dutch Coast Guard at the trap site for 42 and 45 minutes respectively over two days (11-12th). When I got back to the Hotel on the 11th and 12th after seeing the coasties out there I told John. He didn't want to hear it and didn't believe it. However, a couple weeks later he told me he looked into it by talking to Richardson who said "...not to worry, the Coast Guard doesn't have dive capabilities.

GOOD MORNING MONKEYS!  GOOD MORNING ZOOKEEPERS!

Janet
8:30 AM PT


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #793 1/13/09
Post by: Edward on January 16, 2009, 11:31:29 AM
A sign of a good Con Artist..
They used all of Dave's donation money reserved for Natalee searches to pull this off..

These people really piss me off. :gaah:


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #793 1/13/09
Post by: klaasend on January 16, 2009, 11:49:37 AM
http://translate.google.com/translate?u=http%3A%2F%2Fantilliaans.caribiana.nl%2Finnederland%2Fcar20090116_vakantie-senior&sl=nl&tl=en&hl=en&ie=UTF-8

(snipped)

(http://i118.photobucket.com/albums/o100/klaasen3/Sub5/ImageArubaCuradao.jpg)


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #793 1/13/09
Post by: Edward on January 16, 2009, 12:08:34 PM
There next intension is to strip money out of Dr.Phils/Oprahs savings accounts.
Paulus heads up that Group of Legal mumboJumbo Con Artists..
jmho


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #793 1/13/09
Post by: jen3560 on January 16, 2009, 12:15:04 PM
There may not be a clear cut answer to this question, but here goes:

Why would Aruba wait 2.5 years before addressing a body (in a cage) in the ocean?

(1) Was it just sloppy on their end?
(2) Did they feel it was safe there, but needed to move it upon an announced search?

I do not know the answer. Just a thought (out loud) ....

This may not be at all correct - just my thoughts on the matter.

Judging what Kyle told us about the location, what the wind surf guy told us about where the Panter was, and by the fact there is no underwater attraction in that area..............

I believe those who disposed of Natalee felt that place was likely a great place, with little chance of discovery.

it is not an area that gets travelled for commercial fishing.

it is not an area that even the coast guard crosses in their normal route.

it is not by any wrecks or significant reefs to attract divers.

Then there is also my belief that those who disposed of her never could have possibly imagined 9at the time) that this crime would attract the determination and attention of not only Natalee's family - but also the media, the blogging world, and the general public.

I don't believe they ever dreamed there would have been a sea search with the equipment necessary to find her.

Also - living on an island for so long..............I'm sure they know what happens to things that enter the water with the environment and sea life.

I just don't believe they could have ever fathomed she would ever have been found.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #793 1/13/09
Post by: Anna on January 16, 2009, 12:15:58 PM
MINUS -12 degrees BELOWwwwwwww Zerooooooo at 6am  ::MonkeyWaa::


Today
Jan 16

Details Clear
Hi: 22° Lo: 13°


 ::MonkeyWaa:: ::MonkeyWaa::
 


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #793 1/13/09
Post by: Tamikosmom on January 16, 2009, 12:16:59 PM
There may not be a clear cut answer to this question, but here goes:

Why would Aruba wait 2.5 years before addressing a body (in a cage) in the ocean?

(1) Was it just sloppy on their end?
(2) Did they feel it was safe there, but needed to move it upon an announced search?

I do not know the answer. Just a thought (out loud) ....

I contend that the John Silvetti/ALE plan was that upon discovery of the trap/cage which held Natalee Holloway remains ... only the Arubans would take over the sampling and recovery process.  Aruba would then be in the position of claiming that the contents were not case related.  In return John Silvetti would be compensated one way or another.

However ... according to Kyle Kingman's own wordsTim Miller became a liability.  He saw the ROV images ... contacted Dave Holloway and ... excitedly shared that Natalee's remains had been found.

Dateline became an issue.  The ROV images that revealed more than a trap/cage on the bottom of the ocean floor became an issue.  Then Kyle Kingman's own words regarding concerns encompassing the chain of custody ... the John Silvetti Aruban conflict of interest has become an issue.

IMO

Janet

++++++++


KYLE KINGMAN - IN HIS OWN WORDS

Kyle:  I took the proportions of the body form from the head, to shoulder, to a 90 degree angle which I believed to be the hem line of Natalee's skirt. I then took those proportions and matched them to the photo of Natalee with what she was last seen wearing. The proportions matched within an inch from head, to shoulder, to skirt line. Based on this comparison and with what we believed we saw in the Dec 29th video, Tim Miller contacted the family and told them the 99.9% comment. I told Tim not to do anything until we have forensic results back after the site is processed

Kyle:  This program was originally pitched by NBC to Tim Miller to be a docuentary about TES and turned into a documenary about the Search for Natalee Holloway's body.  It seems NBC shamelessly used Tim Miller to get on board the Persistence during the search.

Kyle:  John didn't want Tim Miller on board the Persistence because he said Tim wasn't necessary any more and was a liability.

Kyle:  Tim Miller was never on the Persistence while I was not on board.  He stepped off on or about the 1st of Jan to follow up on the false lead in Costa Rica IIRC.

Kyle:   John is not a believer in the trap. He took ALE's word as gospel that it wasn't case related, yet never studied the videos or bothered to inquire further. He had plans on doing business with Aruba and in S. America and he didn't want to hurt any feelings by talks hinting at lack of complete trust and friendship

Kyle:  He's [John Silvetti] seriously making plans to open an Aruba office so he can conduct business easier in S. America and that would allow him to do that.


THE DATELINE SPECIAL

The search for Natalee Holloway
TRANSCRIPT
By Chris Hansen
Correspondent
NBC News
updated 5:20 p.m. PT, Fri., Feb. 22, 2008


Tim Miller: I stepped on the boat and said “Natalee we're coming to get you.” Now we're finally coming to get you. And I still believe that from the bottom of my heart. She's out here and now we're on our way.

Over the holiday season, the crew of the persistence worked day and night to survey the ocean floor and look for targets that could hold the key to finding Natalee.

On Christmas Eve sonar pictures revealed what looked like a large trap, almost exactly where Tim Miller theorized it would be.

And on Dec. 29 the crew dropped a remote operated vehicle, or ROV, into the water to get a closer look.

Tim Miller: It looked like a skull. Still looks like a skull.  ... In my years of searching we have seen several bodies, skeletal remains--I have seen my own daughter's skeletal remains. I can’t help but believe at this moment that that is human remains in that crab trap.  

http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/23301056/page/4/


The search for Natalee Holloway
TRANSCRIPT
By Chris Hansen
Correspondent
NBC News
updated 5:20 p.m. PT, Fri., Feb. 22, 2008


Dave Holloway: I got a phone call from Tim.

Chris Hansen: And what'd he say?

Dave Holloway: He told me, he said, "Dave, we found her."

Chris Hansen: "We found her?"

Dave Holloway: Yeah. I said, "Are you sure?" and he said, "I’m 99.9 percent sure."  He said, "We hadn't gone down and dove under or anything. But the photographs--"he said, "I tell you, Dave." I-- he said, "That's what we're looking for. And that's gotta-- that-- that's it."

http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/23301056/page/4/


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #793 1/13/09
Post by: Keepthefaith on January 16, 2009, 12:29:07 PM
You're being way to logical again Janet! ::MonkeyLaugh::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #793 1/13/09
Post by: Tamikosmom on January 16, 2009, 12:36:22 PM
You're being way to logical again Janet! ::MonkeyLaugh::

LOGIC DICTATES!!!

 ::MonkeyDance::

Good Morning Keepthefaith.

Janet


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #793 1/13/09
Post by: Keepthefaith on January 16, 2009, 12:48:21 PM
You're being way to logical again Janet! ::MonkeyLaugh::

LOGIC DICTATES!!!

 ::MonkeyDance::

Good Morning Keepthefaith.

Janet

Good Morning to you!Just sitting here thinking what great people the Holloway's are.What they've done down in those water's is reprehensible.We have poster's that come on here and defend them which is their right but i find the SILENCE from Kyle(OE),as well as the rest of the pirates VERY TELLING regarding what transpired out in those waters!It's just my opinion but it seems the only one's that would defend such actions are either family member's,and or crew!Remember this is just my opinion...


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #793 1/13/09
Post by: 2NJSons_Mom on January 16, 2009, 12:51:06 PM
Anna,

You asked a question about the lenth of the Persistence search having been extended.

The time extenstion and larger grid area was due to Richardson saying they needed to search further out, in deeper waters.

This was right after they found the trap.

Silvetti had already turned his back on the trap by this point, and did what Richardson suggested - left the originally planned search area - and extended their grid into deeper waters further out. ::MonkeyConfused::

KYLE KINGMAN - IN HIS OWN WORDS

Kyle:  I know Tim believed me and was convinced 100% which is why he went and told Dave that we found Natalee on Dec 29th. John stood back and waited and worked with the Aruban Polis to arrange the next dive -Dec 30th's which was the visual-only dive. John told me then he didn't want to hear me ever mention the trap again. Of course this didn't set well with me. After the Jan 7th Dive I got off the boat for R&R from the 9th-14th at the Holiday Inn. Remember after the Jan-7th dive which sampled the trap Richardson told John emphatically to "keep searching she's still out there in the deep ocean".  Meanwhile I'm standing on the beach watching the Dutch Coast Guard at the trap site for 42 and 45 minutes respectively over two days (11-12th). When I got back to the Hotel on the 11th and 12th after seeing the coasties out there I told John. He didn't want to hear it and didn't believe it. However, a couple weeks later he told me he looked into it by talking to Richardson who said "...not to worry, the Coast Guard doesn't have dive capabilities.
GOOD MORNING MONKEYS!  GOOD MORNING ZOOKEEPERS!

Janet
8:30 AM PT

I'm having difficulty with these Richardson quotes.  When did he learn of this revelation that Natalee is in the deep ocean?  WTH

USCG has dive units.  I find it absurd that a tourist island has a coast guard without dive capabilities. 

Again, logic dictates.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #793 1/13/09
Post by: Tamikosmom on January 16, 2009, 12:54:28 PM

"THE BEST-LAID PLANS OF MICE AND MEN OFTEN GO AWRY."
Robert Burns

John Silvetti and the ALE never counted on Tim Miller observation as well as his call to Dave Holloway.  John Silvetti and the ALE never counted on Kyle Kingman professional analysis of the ROV image as being the catalyst that would expose the Persistence hoax.

IMO.

Janet

++++++

KYLE KINGMAN - IN HIS OWN WORDS

Kyle:
  I took the proportions of the body form from the head, to shoulder, to a 90 degree angle which I believed to be the hem line of Natalee's skirt. I then took those proportions and matched them to the photo of Natalee with what she was last seen wearing. The proportions matched within an inch from head, to shoulder, to skirt line. Based on this comparison and with what we believed we saw in the Dec 29th video, Tim Miller contacted the family and told them the 99.9% comment. I told Tim not to do anything until we have forensic results back after the site is processed. Jan 7th we sampled the contents and in my opinion we found the skirt under the sand along with the other items The blue fabric was found right where the skirt is pictured. If it isn't her, it will forever haunt me as a major cosmic WTF.

Kyle:  I get done in the survey room backing up the ROV dive and head to the back deck to talk to the Polis divers and see what they sampled and see the Polis boat way in the distance heading away fast. John doesn't seem concerned at all, but I am very dissapointed, concerned, and burning inside because I have a feeling that I/we will never know what they took from the trap. That evening I talked to John asking when we plan on recovering the trap. Previously this was part of the talks and plan, but this time he doesn't seem concerned about ever looking into the trap further.

After John verbally BASHED me about the trap for what I said to Tim Miller about the sand body-form and that I believed her skirt was under the sand, John pretty much committed himself to the belief the trap wasn't what we were after. This shocked me because it was exactly what we were looking for- a fish trap lost at sea with human remains.


Kyle Kingman’s Summary
Kyle Kingman’s Specialties:
 
Project Management, Sonar Acquisition, hydrographic survey, data processing, remote sensing data analysis.

http://www.linkedin.com/pub/b/65/464


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #793 1/13/09
Post by: Keepthefaith on January 16, 2009, 01:02:00 PM
Kyle Kingman

"After John verbally BASHED me about the trap for what I said to Tim Miller about the sand body-form and that I believed her skirt was under the sand, John pretty much committed himself to the belief the trap wasn't what we were after. This shocked me because it was exactly what we were looking for- a fish trap lost at sea with human remains.

LOGIC DICTATES


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #793 1/13/09
Post by: sharon on January 16, 2009, 01:03:35 PM

I'm having difficulty with these Richardson quotes.  When did he learn of this revelation that Natalee is in the deep ocean?  WTH

USCG has dive units.  I find it absurd that a tourist island has a coast guard without dive capabilities. 

Again, logic dictates.

Dirty Dolfi.  ::MonkeyNoNo:: ::MonkeyNoNo:: ::MonkeyNoNo::

Right. I guess their coast guard only guards the coast ABOVE the water.  ::MonkeyConfused::

Our coast guard randomly checks the bottom of cruise & cargo ships before they arrive and depart the Port of Miami ::MonkeyWink::

Guess not in Aruba.

Yet one more reason to...

AVOID ARUBA AS IF YOUR LIFE DEPENDS ON IT...IT DOES!!!


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #793 1/13/09
Post by: klaasend on January 16, 2009, 01:10:57 PM
http://www.hyped.nl/details/20090116_online_poker_speler_krijgt_belastingformulier

Online poker player receives tax form online poker less lucrative tax
 
Think your safe money with poker via the Internet, shows that the Dutch tax authorities in possession of all your data, including user and gains. Online poker players receive a tax form sent home, where they serve their extra income to give, so that tax could be levied. The Inland Revenue is "very accommodating": only the real income tax paid to do, so less additional revenue.


De Telegraaf reports that the measure should yield millions. Some professional pokeraars would sometimes even millions of barrels and to generate additional income without having to comply with the tax. The Tax and sends an initial hundred brochures and letters, part of the so-called control strategy of the service.
In the Netherlands, hundreds of people were pleasant life of poker. It is in our country is immensely popular poker and there are relatively many professional pokeraars as "courageous beginners on" quick money can make. Interestingly enough, even Joran van der Sloot (known from Peter R. de Vries) as a successful pokeraar said. Whether he gets a form is not clear.

Lawyer Duynstee represents forty poker professionals. He claims that they are first confronted with the poker tax. He advises clients not without more pay. According to De Telegraaf, there is great anxiety among pokeraars. They want to know how their name and address of the Tax it.

 ::MonkeyCool::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #793 1/13/09
Post by: Tamikosmom on January 16, 2009, 01:21:56 PM
I understand Kyle Kingman's silence concerning his concerns while on board the Persistence ... not condone the silence ... but I understand.

However ... upon setting foot on American soil ... his first stop should have been the FBI.  All the words Kyle posted on the Natalee's Freebird site and the Scared Monkey's site regarding his concerns regarding a possible coverup in regards to the remains of an American citizen who when missing on Aruban soil ... all the ROV footage ... should have be share with U.S. authorities.

The next stop.  The family of Natalee Holloway.

If doing right was Kyle Kingman's focus ... he could have emerged as a hero by exposing John Silvetti's participation in the finale' to the great Aruban coverup.  Instead ... Kyle Kingman became a participant himself in the finale' to the great Aruban coverup and ... this makes me so angry ... it makes me so sad.

Kyle ... one year later ... it may be late in the game but ... I am pleading that you do the right thing and ... let the chips fall where they may.  Put yourself in the place of Natalee Holloway's family.  Imagine that that the remains of your beloved could have been in that cage/trap and ... please respond accordingly.

Janet


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #793 1/13/09
Post by: Edward on January 16, 2009, 01:24:11 PM
What difference can a day make ????? .....well in this case it meant a lot as they quickly got him on a plane to NL and off Aruba.  You read what was wrote and you see the Judge did not follow his own words.  For the police to release the 3 on 9/3 obviously means there was no 9/4 which had been "known" since July per the article.

The judge and police worked together to manipulate the publicity and any outcry that came.  They used corruption even in this incident of release date.  MO  When did the judge do the "review"?

 "The review of the suspect’s detention was planned by the judge for September 4th, 2005 and date has been public knowledge since July, 2005"........"three suspects in the disappearance of Alabama teenager Natalee Holloway were released from police custody in Aruba on September 3, 2005."

YES!!  I remember THIS as if it was YESTERDAY!!  It took me about a week to pick my JAW up off the Floor!!

I didn't really need any more "data" to know the DECK WAS STACKED against the Holloways and FOR the VD Sloots/J2K...BUT...if I HAD needed more "data", this would have been IT!!




CORRECTAMUNDO.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #793 1/13/09
Post by: Edward on January 16, 2009, 01:24:48 PM
Above from BFN


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #793 1/13/09
Post by: caesu on January 16, 2009, 01:38:47 PM
PG Pietersz: Justice Minister (Croes) should stay silent about 'Holloway'

16 Jan, 2009, 14:24 (GMT -04:00)

http://www.amigoe.com/artman/publish/artikel_51581.php

this is a very interesting article about the Landsrecherche investigation with possible cooperation from the US and Dutch Rijksrecherche.

full English translation will appear on the Amigoe site tomorrow, if not i will attempt to translate, but it is difficult stuff and i don't want to get it wrong.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #793 1/13/09
Post by: klaasend on January 16, 2009, 01:56:10 PM
Caesu - I think this is the same article

http://www.depers.nl/binnenland/277738/Minister-Aruba-moet-zwijgen-over-Holloway-zaak.html

(http://i118.photobucket.com/albums/o100/klaasen3/Sub5/MinisterAruba011609.jpg)


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #793 1/13/09
Post by: caesu on January 16, 2009, 02:07:50 PM
Caesu - I think this is the same article

http://www.depers.nl/binnenland/277738/Minister-Aruba-moet-zwijgen-over-Holloway-zaak.html

(http://i118.photobucket.com/albums/o100/klaasen3/Sub5/MinisterAruba011609.jpg)

yes, that seems a ANP article with a little less information.
http://www.nu.nl/algemeen/1900978/minister-aruba-moet-zwijgen-over-holloway-zaak-.html

it is interesting because it mentions involvement of the Rijksrecherche (this was a demand by Brinkman).
also it mentions that Karin Janssen might have to answer questions.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #793 1/13/09
Post by: klaasend on January 16, 2009, 02:24:36 PM
Caesu - Thanks!  Please let us know if you see anything else on this. 


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #793 1/13/09
Post by: truthseeker2 on January 16, 2009, 02:25:44 PM
Caesu,

Thanks for posting the articles.  It is good to see that Janssen's name is being mentioned.  I am anxious to see an English version of the longer article to see if they allude to a cooperative joint investigation of the 'investigation' that could include some U. S. involvement.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #793 1/13/09
Post by: Tamikosmom on January 16, 2009, 02:44:47 PM
BETH TWITTY: It was a PR dream for the Dutch government to take advantage of such a catastrophic event (Katrina) in the United States in order to release these suspects.
At Large w/Geraldo Rivera - September 12, 2005


1.  08/29/05 - While Joran is still detained ... Deepak and Satish are rearrested.
2.  09/01/05 - Judge rules that Joran is held for another 30 days.
3.  09/01/05 - Judge reverses the ruling.
4.  09/04/05 - Judge rules that Joran, Deepk and Satish are to be released with restrictions.
5.  09/17/05 - A panel of judges rules that restrictions are to be lifted.

+++++++++++++++++

'The Abrams Report' for August 26
updated 11:37 a.m. PT, Mon., Aug. 29, 2005


Statement from the Prosecutor's Office

In the early morning hours of Friday, the 26th of August, 2005, police once more arrested the brothers, Satish Kalpoe and Deepak Kalpoe. They are in custody based on the same suspicions as before. They are suspected of the primary criminal act of together with other people committing premeditated murder, alternately together with other people murdering somebody, more alternately rob a person of her liberty with fatal consequences and even more alternately, raping somebody.

Aside from these suspicions against the two brothers, there are new suspicions, which at this point the prosecutor is not commenting on. To arrest S.K. and D.K. again, there had to be new facts and circumstances. That is the case.

http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/9118769/


Kalpoe Brothers Re-Arrested
Tuesday, August 30, 2005


ELLIS-SCHIPPER: Well, I think it's a big moment, Greta. You know, the prosecution and the investigation is moving very carefully. They don't want to make more mistakes, and they are very careful. So they must have had some real, real evidence and new facts that they felt confident enough to haul them back in.   

... Well, it means that the investigation is moving forward and there's hope that we might go towards a trial because, at first, I was doubting whether we were even facing a trial. It shows that the police have done some good work and apparently gathered evidence, new evidence enough for to bring them back in custody.

http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,167372,00.html


Aruba suspect’s father says son to be released
Elder van der Sloot: Judge rules teen no longer Holloway murder suspect
updated 5:08 p.m. PT, Thurs., Sept. 1, 2005


The judge in the case issued two rulings: In the first, he agreed with prosecutors' request to extend the period of van der Sloot's pretrial detention by 30 more days.

But later Thursday, the judge issued another ruling that sided with the defense — an order to immediately suspend the execution of his earlier pretrial detention order.

http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/9163292/


Aruba Suspects Released From Jail
Sunday, September 04, 2005


SAINT NICOLAAS, Aruba - All three suspects in the disappearance of an Alabama teenager were released from jail Saturday in a setback for the prosecution and the biggest blow yet to Natalee Holloway’s family.

Joran van der Sloot, an 18-year-old Dutchman, and two Surinamese brothers, Satish Kalpoe, 18 and Deepak Kalpoe, 21, were released on condition they remain in Dutch territory and be available to police for questioning.

http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,168442,00.html


Aruba court lifts curbs on three suspects in missing teen case
Updated: Sep 17, 2005 12:52 AM PDT


An Aruban court has ruled that three suspects in the disappearance of Natalee Holloway can remain free without conditions.

Wednesday's ruling overturned an earlier decision that restricted the suspects' travel and required them to remain available to investigators. The appeals court said there was a --quote-- "lack of sufficient grounds and serious suspicions" to keep the restrictions on the three men. Joran van der Sloot and two Surinamese brothers -- Deepak and Satish Kalpoe -- are suspects in the May 30 disappearance of the Alabama teen. They were released from jail on September 3rd on the condition they remain available for questioning.

http://www.wsfa.com/Global/story.asp?S=3857796&nav=0RdEeaxB


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #793 1/13/09
Post by: jen3560 on January 16, 2009, 02:49:41 PM
caesu and klaas,

thank you very much for that information!

Encouraging news, including that Janssen would be expected to answer some questions.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #793 1/13/09
Post by: Tamikosmom on January 16, 2009, 02:58:59 PM
Caesu - I think this is the same article

http://www.depers.nl/binnenland/277738/Minister-Aruba-moet-zwijgen-over-Holloway-zaak.html

(http://i118.photobucket.com/albums/o100/klaasen3/Sub5/MinisterAruba011609.jpg)

Thanks Klaas. Thanks Caesu.

Am I understand this correctly.  Rudy Croes is attempting to distance himself from his words?  Who does not want to go forward?

 ::MonkeyConfused::

What a mess.

Janet


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #793 1/13/09
Post by: johan555 on January 16, 2009, 03:08:25 PM
They have to hear also this Lady (Td Croes) about K janssen !   ::MonkeyHaHa::

(http://i252.photobucket.com/albums/hh25/johan555/36335e76.jpg)


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #793 1/13/09
Post by: klaasend on January 16, 2009, 03:16:35 PM
They have to hear also this Lady (Td Croes) about K janssen !   ::MonkeyHaHa::

(http://i252.photobucket.com/albums/hh25/johan555/36335e76.jpg)

Theresa Croes, and this is pretty old off of Rene van Nie's site.

http://www.renevannie.com/inhoud/kritisch/_kritisch2005.html


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #793 1/13/09
Post by: johan555 on January 16, 2009, 03:20:23 PM
They have to hear also this Lady (Td Croes) about K janssen !   ::MonkeyHaHa::

(http://i252.photobucket.com/albums/hh25/johan555/36335e76.jpg)

Theresa Croes, and this is pretty old off of Rene van Nie's site.

http://www.renevannie.com/inhoud/kritisch/_kritisch2005.html

And they should hear Joran of course    ::MonkeyHaHa::

(http://i252.photobucket.com/albums/hh25/johan555/33964869_jpg_598873i.jpg?t=1232136967)


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #793 1/13/09
Post by: caesu on January 16, 2009, 03:24:53 PM
Caesu - I think this is the same article

http://www.depers.nl/binnenland/277738/Minister-Aruba-moet-zwijgen-over-Holloway-zaak.html

(http://i118.photobucket.com/albums/o100/klaasen3/Sub5/MinisterAruba011609.jpg)

Thanks Klaas. Thanks Caesu.

Am I understand this correctly.  Rudy Croes is attempting to distance himself from his words?  Who does not want to go forward?

 ::MonkeyConfused::

What a mess.

Janet

PG Pietersz just want Croes to stay silent while the investigation into the investigation is ongoing.
the Landsrecherche investigation is ordered by the PG, not Croes, to not make it seem like the investigation is political.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #793 1/13/09
Post by: MuffyBee on January 16, 2009, 03:45:43 PM
caesu and klaas,

thank you very much for that information!

Encouraging news, including that Janssen would be expected to answer some questions.

This could be verrrrry interesting.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #793 1/13/09
Post by: sharon on January 16, 2009, 04:02:13 PM

And they should hear Joran of course    ::MonkeyHaHa::

(http://i252.photobucket.com/albums/hh25/johan555/33964869_jpg_598873i.jpg?t=1232136967)

 ::MonkeyLaugh::

Good one  ::MonkeyWink::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #793 1/13/09
Post by: bastibro on January 16, 2009, 04:10:31 PM
They have to hear also this Lady (Td Croes) about K janssen !   ::MonkeyHaHa::

(http://i252.photobucket.com/albums/hh25/johan555/36335e76.jpg)

Theresa Croes, and this is pretty old off of Rene van Nie's site.

http://www.renevannie.com/inhoud/kritisch/_kritisch2005.html

And they should hear Joran of course    ::MonkeyHaHa::

(http://i252.photobucket.com/albums/hh25/johan555/33964869_jpg_598873i.jpg?t=1232136967)

Super!  ::MonkeyLaugh:: ::MonkeyLaugh:: ::MonkeyLaugh::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #793 1/13/09
Post by: bastibro on January 16, 2009, 04:21:29 PM

So Pietersz regrets the statements made by Rudy Croes.
The question is whether Pietersz would also have ordered a investigation into facts without Croes statements . .

Pietersz actually think it is nonsense but for the record is still ordering little investigation?
Let us hope that there will be a serious investigation and not an `Aruban` one, because I get that impression after reading the reasoning of this man  ::MonkeyNoNo::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #793 1/13/09
Post by: Tamikosmom on January 16, 2009, 04:31:14 PM

So Pietersz regrets the statements made by Rudy Croes.
The question is whether Pietersz would also have ordered a investigation into facts without Croes statements . .

Pietersz actually think it is nonsense but for the record is still ordering little investigation?  
Let us hope that there will be a serious investigation and not an `Aruban` one, because I get that impression after reading the reasoning of this man  ::MonkeyNoNo::

bastibro ... my take exactly.

Janet


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #793 1/13/09
Post by: bastibro on January 16, 2009, 04:37:30 PM

So Pietersz regrets the statements made by Rudy Croes.
The question is whether Pietersz would also have ordered a investigation into facts without Croes statements . .

Pietersz actually think it is nonsense but for the record is still ordering little investigation?  
Let us hope that there will be a serious investigation and not an `Aruban` one, because I get that impression after reading the reasoning of this man  ::MonkeyNoNo::

bastibro ... my take exactly.

Janet

Those people seem to have no integrity at all ::MonkeyNoNo::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #793 1/13/09
Post by: Blonde on January 16, 2009, 04:46:58 PM
Anna,

You asked a question about the lenth of the Persistence search having been extended.

The time extenstion and larger grid area was due to Richardson saying they needed to search further out, in deeper waters.

This was right after they found the trap.

Silvetti had already turned his back on the trap by this point, and did what Richardson suggested - left the originally planned search area - and extended their grid into deeper waters further out. ::MonkeyConfused::

KYLE KINGMAN - IN HIS OWN WORDS

Kyle:  I know Tim believed me and was convinced 100% which is why he went and told Dave that we found Natalee on Dec 29th. John stood back and waited and worked with the Aruban Polis to arrange the next dive -Dec 30th's which was the visual-only dive. John told me then he didn't want to hear me ever mention the trap again. Of course this didn't set well with me. After the Jan 7th Dive I got off the boat for R&R from the 9th-14th at the Holiday Inn. Remember after the Jan-7th dive which sampled the trap Richardson told John emphatically to "keep searching she's still out there in the deep ocean".  Meanwhile I'm standing on the beach watching the Dutch Coast Guard at the trap site for 42 and 45 minutes respectively over two days (11-12th). When I got back to the Hotel on the 11th and 12th after seeing the coasties out there I told John. He didn't want to hear it and didn't believe it. However, a couple weeks later he told me he looked into it by talking to Richardson who said "...not to worry, the Coast Guard doesn't have dive capabilities.
GOOD MORNING MONKEYS!  GOOD MORNING ZOOKEEPERS!

Janet
8:30 AM PT

I'm having difficulty with these Richardson quotes.  When did he learn of this revelation that Natalee is in the deep ocean?  WTH

USCG has dive units.  I find it absurd that a tourist island has a coast guard without dive capabilities. 

Again, logic dictates.


Working with the Aruba police dive division, Coast Guard, and Port Authority has been an astonishing experience. Since December 15th we've established a solid working relationship based on openness and trust. Most of the successful rapport was due to getting the media hype out of the way and working together shoulder to shoulder through time. We've helped each other however and whenever we can. They've treated us with decency and respect and we have treated them as friends and allies, which they are. I wish we had a month ahead of the project just to ascertain the relationships and bonds. Although highly skeptical and suspecting in the beginning, it's clear we're all carefully and diligently working towards a common goal. It seems we share the same attitudes of integrity, courage, dedication, and hope. We’ve all struck an accord in the desire for closure and healing for the families involved and restoring the relationship between our beloved countries.
::MonkeyEek::

http://74.125.47.132/search?q=cache:2nmFQOyFVZsJ:nholloway.blogspot.com/2008/01/xv-aruba.html+does+Coast+Guard+in+aruba+have+dive+capabilities&hl=en&ct=clnk&cd=3&gl=us


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #793 1/13/09
Post by: caesu on January 16, 2009, 05:18:03 PM

So Pietersz regrets the statements made by Rudy Croes.
The question is whether Pietersz would also have ordered a investigation into facts without Croes statements . .

Pietersz actually think it is nonsense but for the record is still ordering little investigation?
Let us hope that there will be a serious investigation and not an `Aruban` one, because I get that impression after reading the reasoning of this man  ::MonkeyNoNo::

that's indeed kind of odd.
but you could also read it that Pietersz is saying Croes shouldn't have said it publicly, instead let the PG know the information privately.
but then i ask why didn't do Croes this 3.5 years ago?
and would Pietersz have ordered the Landsrecherche investigation if there was no media-attention (about Croes comments) and demands from Bijleveld for an investigation.

funny thing in this is that each time everyone (other members of parliament) disagrees with Brinkman publically.
but in the end Aruba does what he demanded. (or at least try to make it appear that they do what he demanded).
let's hope something comes of it.

i would prefer a full Rijksrecherche investigation.

for now it's good that Croes name and Karin Janssen name gets mentioned in the Dutch media again.
i hope Croes isn't smart and opens his stupid mouth again.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #793 1/13/09
Post by: Tamikosmom on January 16, 2009, 05:25:46 PM

Working with the Aruba police dive division, Coast Guard, and Port Authority has been an astonishing experience. Since December 15th we've established a solid working relationship based on openness and trust. Most of the successful rapport was due to getting the media hype out of the way and working together shoulder to shoulder through time. We've helped each other however and whenever we can. They've treated us with decency and respect and we have treated them as friends and allies, which they are. I wish we had a month ahead of the project just to ascertain the relationships and bonds. Although highly skeptical and suspecting in the beginning, it's clear we're all carefully and diligently working towards a common goal. It seems we share the same attitudes of integrity, courage, dedication, and hope. We’ve all struck an accord in the desire for closure and healing for the families involved and restoring the relationship between our beloved countries. ::MonkeyEek::

http://74.125.47.132/search?q=cache:2nmFQOyFVZsJ:nholloway.blogspot.com/2008/01/xv-aruba.html+does+Coast+Guard+in+aruba+have+dive+capabilities&hl=en&ct=clnk&cd=3&gl=us

The Search for Natalee Holloway
http://nholloway.blogspot.com/2008/01/xv-aruba.html

+++++++

Blonde ... Kyle Kingman was so deceptive in his words in the above post which he submitted on "Sun 27-Jan 2355 hrs".  He had already witnessed the chain of custody pertaining to the contents of the cage/trap ... the chain of custody that did not include the crew of the Persistence ... the chain of custody that took place on January 7, 2008.  Kyle states in his own word that he was concerned ... concerned that the contents of that cage would never be known.

Think about it Kyle.  Your words to the Persistence blog ... The Search for Natalee Holloway ... implies that you were knowlingly upholding the enemy who had prevented justice from prevailing since the getgo and ... you were fully aware that you were covering up for John Silvetti's participation in the finale' to the great Aruban coverup.

Dispicable!!

Janet

+++++++++

KYLE KINGMAN - IN HIS OWN WORDS

Kyle:
  I took the proportions of the body form from the head, to shoulder, to a 90 degree angle which I believed to be the hem line of Natalee's skirt. I then took those proportions and matched them to the photo of Natalee with what she was last seen wearing. The proportions matched within an inch from head, to shoulder, to skirt line. Based on this comparison and with what we believed we saw in the Dec 29th video, Tim Miller contacted the family and told them the 99.9% comment. I told Tim not to do anything until we have forensic results back after the site is processed. Jan 7th we sampled the contents and in my opinion we found the skirt under the sand along with the other items The blue fabric was found right where the skirt is pictured. If it isn't her, it will forever haunt me as a major cosmic WTF.

Kyle:  I get done in the survey room backing up the ROV dive and head to the back deck to talk to the Polis divers and see what they sampled and see the Polis boat way in the distance heading away fast. John doesn't seem concerned at all, but I am very dissapointed, concerned, and burning inside because I have a feeling that I/we will never know what they took from the trap.  That evening I talked to John asking when we plan on recovering the trap. Previously this was part of the talks and plan, but this time he doesn't seem concerned about ever looking into the trap further.  After John verbally BASHED me about the trap for what I said to Tim Miller about the sand body-form and that I believed her skirt was under the sand, John pretty much committed himself to the belief the trap wasn't what we were after. This shocked me because it was exactly what we were looking for- a fish trap lost at sea with human remains.

Kyle:    John is not a believer in the trap. He took ALE's word as gospel that it wasn't case related, yet never studied the videos or bothered to inquire further. He had plans on doing business with Aruba and in S. America and he didn't want to hurt any feelings by talks hinting at lack of complete trust and friendship.










Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #793 1/13/09
Post by: Keepthefaith on January 16, 2009, 06:23:37 PM

Working with the Aruba police dive division, Coast Guard, and Port Authority has been an astonishing experience. Since December 15th we've established a solid working relationship based on openness and trust. Most of the successful rapport was due to getting the media hype out of the way and working together shoulder to shoulder through time. We've helped each other however and whenever we can. They've treated us with decency and respect and we have treated them as friends and allies, which they are. I wish we had a month ahead of the project just to ascertain the relationships and bonds. Although highly skeptical and suspecting in the beginning, it's clear we're all carefully and diligently working towards a common goal. It seems we share the same attitudes of integrity, courage, dedication, and hope. We’ve all struck an accord in the desire for closure and healing for the families involved and restoring the relationship between our beloved countries. ::MonkeyEek::

http://74.125.47.132/search?q=cache:2nmFQOyFVZsJ:nholloway.blogspot.com/2008/01/xv-aruba.html+does+Coast+Guard+in+aruba+have+dive+capabilities&hl=en&ct=clnk&cd=3&gl=us

The Search for Natalee Holloway
http://nholloway.blogspot.com/2008/01/xv-aruba.html

+++++++

Blonde ... Kyle Kingman was so deceptive in his words in the above post which he submitted on "Sun 27-Jan 2355 hrs".  He had already witnessed the chain of custody pertaining to the contents of the cage/trap ... the chain of custody that did not include the crew of the Persistence ... the chain of custody that took place on January 7, 2008.  Kyle states in his own word that he was concerned ... concerned that the contents of that cage would never be known.

Think about it Kyle.  Your words to the Persistence blog ... The Search for Natalee Holloway ... implies that you were knowlingly upholding the enemy who had prevented justice from prevailing since the getgo and ... you were fully aware that you were covering up for John Silvetti's participation in the finale' to the great Aruban coverup.

Dispicable!!

Janet

+++++++++

KYLE KINGMAN - IN HIS OWN WORDS

Kyle:
  I took the proportions of the body form from the head, to shoulder, to a 90 degree angle which I believed to be the hem line of Natalee's skirt. I then took those proportions and matched them to the photo of Natalee with what she was last seen wearing. The proportions matched within an inch from head, to shoulder, to skirt line. Based on this comparison and with what we believed we saw in the Dec 29th video, Tim Miller contacted the family and told them the 99.9% comment. I told Tim not to do anything until we have forensic results back after the site is processed. Jan 7th we sampled the contents and in my opinion we found the skirt under the sand along with the other items The blue fabric was found right where the skirt is pictured. If it isn't her, it will forever haunt me as a major cosmic WTF.

Kyle:  I get done in the survey room backing up the ROV dive and head to the back deck to talk to the Polis divers and see what they sampled and see the Polis boat way in the distance heading away fast. John doesn't seem concerned at all, but I am very dissapointed, concerned, and burning inside because I have a feeling that I/we will never know what they took from the trap.  That evening I talked to John asking when we plan on recovering the trap. Previously this was part of the talks and plan, but this time he doesn't seem concerned about ever looking into the trap further.  After John verbally BASHED me about the trap for what I said to Tim Miller about the sand body-form and that I believed her skirt was under the sand, John pretty much committed himself to the belief the trap wasn't what we were after. This shocked me because it was exactly what we were looking for- a fish trap lost at sea with human remains.

Kyle:    John is not a believer in the trap. He took ALE's word as gospel that it wasn't case related, yet never studied the videos or bothered to inquire further. He had plans on doing business with Aruba and in S. America and he didn't want to hurt any feelings by talks hinting at lack of complete trust and friendship.










The Persistence.What a great group of advocates for Natalee,as well as our country!


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #793 1/13/09
Post by: Tamikosmom on January 16, 2009, 06:47:55 PM
I cannot comprehend why EVERY monkey who reads Kyle Kingman's own words in regards to the happening encompassing the Persistence undertaking is not angry ... is ready to move on.  Natalee Holloway deserved more.  IMO.  The family deserved more.  Those who sacrificially donated deserved more.

When it is considered that the Arubans are preceived to be behind a coverup that has prevented justice from prevailing for Natalee Holloway since May 30, 2005 ... logic dictates that without an agreement negotiated by John Silvetti with the ALE in the planning stages of the Persistence undertaking in regards to the chain of custody IF anything appeared to be case related were discovered ... the entire endeavor was doomed prior to from the beginning.

When it is considered that the Arubans are preceived to be behind a coverup that has prevented justice from prevailing for Natalee Holloway since May 30, 2005 ... logic dictates that without an agreement negotiated by John Silvetti with the ALE in the planning stages of the Persistence undertaking in regard to an FBI agent on board to observe the chain of custody IFanything that appeared to be case related were discovered ... the entire endeavor was doomed prior to even beginning.

Private Eye ... Natalee Holloway's uncle ... said it best.

Janet

++++++


private eye
Re: Natalee Case Discussion #746 4/4
« Reply #499 on: April 09, 2008, 12:39:50 AM »


If I understood Kyle correctly, and that would be that the Arubans retrieved and possessed all finds, not sharing anything with the crew, then that effort was a waste of time and effort. The only thing it could have accomplished was to locate additional evidence for the Arubans to destroy.  The effort was superb, but the game was fixed.

http://scaredmonkeys.net/index.php?topic=2769.msg372245;topicseen#msg372245


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #793 1/13/09
Post by: Tamikosmom on January 16, 2009, 06:53:13 PM
 ::MonkeyWaa::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #793 1/13/09
Post by: texasmom on January 16, 2009, 07:03:42 PM
::MonkeyWaa::

You are not alone Janet....   ::MonkeyWaa::

I'm mad too, and I can't get past it.  And I'm sad....for Natalee.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #793 1/13/09
Post by: Tamikosmom on January 16, 2009, 07:16:51 PM
::MonkeyWaa::

You are not alone Janet....   ::MonkeyWaa::

I'm mad too, and I can't get past it.  And I'm sad....for Natalee.

Thanks texasmom.

In my opinion ... I believe with all my heart that there will be justice but ... the domino effect of accountability implies justice is never going to come out of an Aruban or Dutch courtroom for Natalee Holloway.

However ... the Persistence undertaking held out hope that a measure of closure would be afforded the family IF Natalee Holloway's remains were discovered.  That hope was forever lost when ... according to Kyle Kingman's own words ... Silvetti's self-serving interests took priority.

  ::MonkeyNoNo::

Janet


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #793 1/13/09
Post by: Keepthefaith on January 16, 2009, 07:18:28 PM
::MonkeyWaa::

You are not alone Janet....   ::MonkeyWaa::

I'm mad too, and I can't get past it.  And I'm sad....for Natalee.

Accountability and the Persistence are like OIL and Water! ::MonkeyCool::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #793 1/13/09
Post by: Tamikosmom on January 16, 2009, 07:21:11 PM
Bye for now ... Debbie, Keepthefaith, Magnolia and Nut44x4.

Janet
4:20 PM PT


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #793 1/13/09
Post by: Keepthefaith on January 16, 2009, 07:26:25 PM
Bye for now ... Debbie, Keepthefaith, Magnolia and Nut44x4.

Janet
4:20 PM PT

Bye Janet!JUSTICE FOR NATALEE ::MonkeyDance::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #793 1/13/09
Post by: Keepthefaith on January 16, 2009, 07:27:32 PM
Anyone think CapsLockWizard can tell us who's gonna win the Super Bowl!

 ::MonkeyDance:: ::MonkeyDance:: ::MonkeyDance:: ::MonkeyDance:: ::MonkeyDance::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #793 1/13/09
Post by: Keepthefaith on January 16, 2009, 07:28:27 PM
Anyone think CapsLockWizard can tell us who's gonna win the Super Bowl!

 ::MonkeyDance:: ::MonkeyDance:: ::MonkeyDance:: ::MonkeyDance:: ::MonkeyDance::

My money's on whoever he doesn't pick!Please CapsLockWizard!


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #793 1/13/09
Post by: Nut44x4 on January 16, 2009, 07:37:33 PM
Night Janet :)


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #793 1/13/09
Post by: Blonde on January 16, 2009, 08:10:06 PM
I cannot comprehend why EVERY monkey who reads Kyle Kingman's own words in regards to the happening encompassing the Persistence undertaking is not angry ... is ready to move on.  Natalee Holloway deserved more.  IMO.  The family deserved more.  Those who sacrificially donated deserved more.

When it is considered that the Arubans are preceived to be behind a coverup that has prevented justice from prevailing for Natalee Holloway since May 30, 2005 ... logic dictates that without an agreement negotiated by John Silvetti with the ALE in the planning stages of the Persistence undertaking in regards to the chain of custody IF anything appeared to be case related were discovered ... the entire endeavor was doomed prior to from the beginning.

When it is considered that the Arubans are preceived to be behind a coverup that has prevented justice from prevailing for Natalee Holloway since May 30, 2005 ... logic dictates that without an agreement negotiated by John Silvetti with the ALE in the planning stages of the Persistence undertaking in regard to an FBI agent on board to observe the chain of custody IFanything that appeared to be case related were discovered ... the entire endeavor was doomed prior to even beginning.

Private Eye ... Natalee Holloway's uncle ... said it best.

Janet

++++++


private eye
Re: Natalee Case Discussion #746 4/4
« Reply #499 on: April 09, 2008, 12:39:50 AM »


If I understood Kyle correctly, and that would be that the Arubans retrieved and possessed all finds, not sharing anything with the crew, then that effort was a waste of time and effort. The only thing it could have accomplished was to locate additional evidence for the Arubans to destroy.  The effort was superb, but the game was fixed.

http://scaredmonkeys.net/index.php?topic=2769.msg372245;topicseen#msg372245


I cannot comprehend why EVERY monkey who reads Kyle Kingman's own words in regards to the happening encompassing the Persistence undertaking is not angry

The effort was a waste of time and effort. The only thing it could have accomplished was to locate additional evidence for the Arubans to destroy.  The effort was superb, but the game was fixed.


 TRUST ME, I AM VERY ANGRY. I HAVE DONE MY VERY BEST TO HELP BRING NATALEE HOME,I WILL NOT STOP.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #793 1/13/09
Post by: hotping on January 16, 2009, 08:17:57 PM
I cannot comprehend why EVERY monkey who reads Kyle Kingman's own words in regards to the happening encompassing the Persistence undertaking is not angry ... is ready to move on.  Natalee Holloway deserved more.  IMO.  The family deserved more.  Those who sacrificially donated deserved more.

When it is considered that the Arubans are preceived to be behind a coverup that has prevented justice from prevailing for Natalee Holloway since May 30, 2005 ... logic dictates that without an agreement negotiated by John Silvetti with the ALE in the planning stages of the Persistence undertaking in regards to the chain of custody IF anything appeared to be case related were discovered ... the entire endeavor was doomed prior to from the beginning.

When it is considered that the Arubans are preceived to be behind a coverup that has prevented justice from prevailing for Natalee Holloway since May 30, 2005 ... logic dictates that without an agreement negotiated by John Silvetti with the ALE in the planning stages of the Persistence undertaking in regard to an FBI agent on board to observe the chain of custody IFanything that appeared to be case related were discovered ... the entire endeavor was doomed prior to even beginning.

Private Eye ... Natalee Holloway's uncle ... said it best.

Janet

++++++


private eye
Re: Natalee Case Discussion #746 4/4
« Reply #499 on: April 09, 2008, 12:39:50 AM »


If I understood Kyle correctly, and that would be that the Arubans retrieved and possessed all finds, not sharing anything with the crew, then that effort was a waste of time and effort. The only thing it could have accomplished was to locate additional evidence for the Arubans to destroy.  The effort was superb, but the game was fixed.

http://scaredmonkeys.net/index.php?topic=2769.msg372245;topicseen#msg372245


I cannot comprehend why EVERY monkey who reads Kyle Kingman's own words in regards to the happening encompassing the Persistence undertaking is not angry

The effort was a waste of time and effort. The only thing it could have accomplished was to locate additional evidence for the Arubans to destroy.  The effort was superb, but the game was fixed.


 TRUST ME, I AM VERY ANGRY. I HAVE DONE MY VERY BEST TO HELP BRING NATALEE HOME,I WILL NOT STOP.

Ditto! I'm Madder than Hell Too! I Will NOT GIVE UP on Justice for Natalee! My Prayers will Continue!


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #793 1/13/09
Post by: Magnolia on January 16, 2009, 10:00:56 PM
I am angry too, Janet.
I am especially mad that it was American pirates that conspired
to keep the remains in the trap hidden.  That is absolutely unforgivable.
I am angry at CapsLockWizzard and his cohorts for coming to this
forum to misdirect the attention from the cage/trap and it's contents,
while pretending to be helpful.  I cannot understand how anyone can
still believe in his foolishness.
I am angry at the cowards on Aruba who have gone so far to cover up
Natalee's murder, and Joran van der Sloot for killing her.
Damn them all.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #793 1/13/09
Post by: wreck on January 16, 2009, 10:09:18 PM
I am angry too, Janet.
I am especially mad that it was American pirates that conspired
to keep the remains in the trap hidden.  That is absolutely unforgivable.
I am angry at CapsLockWizzard and his cohorts for coming to this
forum to misdirect the attention from the cage/trap and it's contents,
while pretending to be helpful.  I cannot understand how anyone can
still believe in his foolishness.
I am angry at the cowards on Aruba who have gone so far to cover up
Natalee's murder, and Joran van der Sloot for killing her.
Damn them all.
Yep!


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #793 1/13/09
Post by: wreck on January 16, 2009, 10:22:58 PM
I'm sick and tired of this annual charade -- PERIOD!! I'm tired of of the U.S. Government's silence. I'm tired of EVERYONE telling us "big things are happening".   ::MonkeyNoNo::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #793 1/13/09
Post by: Keepthefaith on January 16, 2009, 10:55:02 PM
I'm sick and tired of this annual charade -- PERIOD!! I'm tired of of the U.S. Government's silence. I'm tired of EVERYONE telling us "big things are happening".   ::MonkeyNoNo::

I second that.I've been hearing something BIG is gonna happen for close to 4 years now!Paulus Van Der Sloot can not be that important.SERIOUSLY.We know Aruba,as well as the Netherlands are gonna only give a Dog and Pony show.Nothing more,nothing less.THE AMERICAN GOVT needs to send in the clandestine operatives to Aruba,Thailand,Laos,The Netherlands or wherever and extricate the TRUTH or..I don't know.
Do,Whatever they do. ::MonkeyCool::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #793 1/13/09
Post by: Tamikosmom on January 16, 2009, 11:09:44 PM
Natalee Monkeys

You are all the best.  It is sooo important that we are here to encourage one another.  It has been almost four years and ... the neverending roller coaster ride that goes nowhere in regards to justice for Natalee Holloway at times does become overwhelming.

Tomorrow is a new day.

Love, Janet
8:10 PM PT 


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #793 1/13/09
Post by: San on January 16, 2009, 11:13:40 PM
Natalee Monkeys

You are all the best.  It is sooo important that we are here to encourage one another.  It has been almost four years and ... the neverending roller coaster ride that goes nowhere in regards to justice for Natalee Holloway at times does become overwhelming.

Tomorrow is a new day.

Love, Janet
8:10 PM PT 

Never Give Up.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #793 1/13/09
Post by: hotping on January 16, 2009, 11:16:29 PM
Thanks Janet!....You are Absolutely right...We will be here for as long as it takes to get Justice for Natalee.....  ::MonkeyCool::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #793 1/13/09
Post by: 2NJSons_Mom on January 16, 2009, 11:28:37 PM
Natalee Monkeys

You are all the best.  It is sooo important that we are here to encourage one another.  It has been almost four years and ... the neverending roller coaster ride that goes nowhere in regards to justice for Natalee Holloway at times does become overwhelming.

Tomorrow is a new day.

Love, Janet
8:10 PM PT 

We're here, and as San has said, 'never give up'.  We're not going away.  No way.  Logic dictates, right?   ::MonkeyWink::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #793 1/13/09
Post by: hotping on January 16, 2009, 11:30:14 PM
Natalee Monkeys

You are all the best.  It is sooo important that we are here to encourage one another.  It has been almost four years and ... the neverending roller coaster ride that goes nowhere in regards to justice for Natalee Holloway at times does become overwhelming.

Tomorrow is a new day.

Love, Janet
8:10 PM PT 

We're here, and as San has said, 'never give up'.  We're not going away.  No way.  Logic dictates, right?   ::MonkeyWink::
Right!  ::MonkeyWink::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #793 1/13/09
Post by: Tamikosmom on January 16, 2009, 11:36:11 PM
Natalee Monkeys

You are all the best.  It is sooo important that we are here to encourage one another.  It has been almost four years and ... the neverending roller coaster ride that goes nowhere in regards to justice for Natalee Holloway at times does become overwhelming.

Tomorrow is a new day.

Love, Janet
8:10 PM PT 

We're here, and as San has said, 'never give up'.  We're not going away.  No way.  Logic dictates, right?   ::MonkeyWink::

 ::MonkeyTongue::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #793 1/13/09
Post by: 2NJSons_Mom on January 16, 2009, 11:39:20 PM
Natalee Monkeys

You are all the best.  It is sooo important that we are here to encourage one another.  It has been almost four years and ... the neverending roller coaster ride that goes nowhere in regards to justice for Natalee Holloway at times does become overwhelming.

Tomorrow is a new day.

Love, Janet
8:10 PM PT 

We're here, and as San has said, 'never give up'.  We're not going away.  No way.  Logic dictates, right?   ::MonkeyWink::
Right!  ::MonkeyWink::

'don't let the b**tards get you down'....


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #793 1/13/09
Post by: casa on January 16, 2009, 11:41:10 PM
I have a question for everyone to ponder.  We all know how Beth, Dave, Jug and others in the family were very vocal when Natalee went missing.  Very much into searching for her and ready to expose what they went through in Aruba and the mess that was going on.  Here is the question.  Do you think that if there was any chance that Natalee was in that trap that the family would be so quiet?  We have heard nothing from the family.  I personally think that in all this turmoil about the crab trap I would take my cues from the family.  They do know more than us and yes they do know more than Kermit.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #793 1/13/09
Post by: wreck on January 16, 2009, 11:47:48 PM
I have a question for everyone to ponder.  We all know how Beth, Dave, Jug and others in the family were very vocal when Natalee went missing.  Very much into searching for her and ready to expose what they went through in Aruba and the mess that was going on.  Here is the question.  Do you think that if there was any chance that Natalee was in that trap that the family would be so quiet?  We have heard nothing from the family.  I personally think that in all this turmoil about the crab trap I would take my cues from the family.  They do know more than us and yes they do know more than Kermit.
Yes, I think they DO have reasonto be quiet about it. You can't keep "tipping your hand" before you nail the perps.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #793 1/13/09
Post by: Keepthefaith on January 16, 2009, 11:50:14 PM
I have a question for everyone to ponder.  We all know how Beth, Dave, Jug and others in the family were very vocal when Natalee went missing.  Very much into searching for her and ready to expose what they went through in Aruba and the mess that was going on.  Here is the question.  Do you think that if there was any chance that Natalee was in that trap that the family would be so quiet?  We have heard nothing from the family.  I personally think that in all this turmoil about the crab trap I would take my cues from the family.  They do know more than us and yes they do know more than Kermit.


Hello Monekys,

Thank you Klaas for approving my membership.

I am the former Natalee's Freebirds Administrator.

To answer ldstlou - NO, I am not disgruntled.  No, I am no longer a member at that forum.  I resigned today.

That is an outstanding group of people, with hearts of gold.  I admire and respect each and every one of them.

It was merely time for me to move on.  I felt that we had achieved all we could there over the past 2 1/2 years, and all of the Freebirds - former and current - will always be in my heart.

Kermit did the right thing by making this information public at Beth Holloway's request (albeit 2 months after she asked us to do so thanks to the need to avoid litigation).

I just simply couldn't stand by any longer and watch the continued confusion perpetrated by two particular posters here.  Whether it's been unintentional or deliberate - it really needs to stop now.

Wingnut made an excellent point - and I feel it's one that's been largely overlooked - pressure needs to be applied to get the answers as to what happened to the human remains Aruba recovered from that fishing cage.

Monkeys - you all are stellar at banding together and getting action.

The FBI can only do so much - with their limited jurisdiction.  They can speak to and subpoena from the members of the Persistence their statements and video to ascertain what was found.

Then it becomes an international issue.  Our State Department is where the encouragement is needed - to put pressure on the Hague to get to the bottom of this.

But something must be done.  Natalee's family has been through enough, and that they (and Natalee) were treated so shabbily by the one resource they felt they could trust is utterly heart wrenching.

Thank you Monkeys for allowing me to be here - let's help Natalee's family get some justice!

At who's request?


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #793 1/13/09
Post by: casa on January 16, 2009, 11:52:06 PM
I have a question for everyone to ponder.  We all know how Beth, Dave, Jug and others in the family were very vocal when Natalee went missing.  Very much into searching for her and ready to expose what they went through in Aruba and the mess that was going on.  Here is the question.  Do you think that if there was any chance that Natalee was in that trap that the family would be so quiet?  We have heard nothing from the family.  I personally think that in all this turmoil about the crab trap I would take my cues from the family.  They do know more than us and yes they do know more than Kermit.
Yes, I think they DO have reasonto be quiet about it. You can't keep "tipping your hand" before you nail the perps.


Who do you think are the perps here?  Kyle, Silvetti, Aruba? 


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #793 1/13/09
Post by: Keepthefaith on January 16, 2009, 11:52:42 PM
I have a question for everyone to ponder.  We all know how Beth, Dave, Jug and others in the family were very vocal when Natalee went missing.  Very much into searching for her and ready to expose what they went through in Aruba and the mess that was going on.  Here is the question.  Do you think that if there was any chance that Natalee was in that trap that the family would be so quiet?  We have heard nothing from the family.  I personally think that in all this turmoil about the crab trap I would take my cues from the family.  They do know more than us and yes they do know more than Kermit.


Hello Monekys,

Thank you Klaas for approving my membership.

I am the former Natalee's Freebirds Administrator.

To answer ldstlou - NO, I am not disgruntled.  No, I am no longer a member at that forum.  I resigned today.

That is an outstanding group of people, with hearts of gold.  I admire and respect each and every one of them.

It was merely time for me to move on.  I felt that we had achieved all we could there over the past 2 1/2 years, and all of the Freebirds - former and current - will always be in my heart.

Kermit did the right thing by making this information public at Beth Holloway's request (albeit 2 months after she asked us to do so thanks to the need to avoid litigation).

I just simply couldn't stand by any longer and watch the continued confusion perpetrated by two particular posters here.  Whether it's been unintentional or deliberate - it really needs to stop now.

Wingnut made an excellent point - and I feel it's one that's been largely overlooked - pressure needs to be applied to get the answers as to what happened to the human remains Aruba recovered from that fishing cage.

Monkeys - you all are stellar at banding together and getting action.

The FBI can only do so much - with their limited jurisdiction.  They can speak to and subpoena from the members of the Persistence their statements and video to ascertain what was found.

Then it becomes an international issue.  Our State Department is where the encouragement is needed - to put pressure on the Hague to get to the bottom of this.

But something must be done.  Natalee's family has been through enough, and that they (and Natalee) were treated so shabbily by the one resource they felt they could trust is utterly heart wrenching.

Thank you Monkeys for allowing me to be here - let's help Natalee's family get some justice!

At who's request?


Did i read that letter from Jen incorrectly?Kermit made this information public at Beth Holloway's request!Correct?Monkey's.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #793 1/13/09
Post by: Tamikosmom on January 16, 2009, 11:55:00 PM
I have a question for everyone to ponder.  We all know how Beth, Dave, Jug and others in the family were very vocal when Natalee went missing.  Very much into searching for her and ready to expose what they went through in Aruba and the mess that was going on.  Here is the question.  Do you think that if there was any chance that Natalee was in that trap that the family would be so quiet?  We have heard nothing from the family.  I personally think that in all this turmoil about the crab trap I would take my cues from the family.  They do know more than us and yes they do know more than Kermit.

Casa ... if the family believes Kyle Kingman's own words regarding the happenings on board the Persistence ... happenings that had everything to do with John Silvetti's bowing to his own self-interests and ... assisting the ALE in the finale' to the great Aruban coverup ... then I have to believe that there is something in the works behind scenes.

Beth Holloway gave the Natalee's Freebirds permission to expose the words the Kyle Kingman posted on their private site and ... that is exactly what Kermit did.

Janet

+++++++


KYLE KINGMAN - IN HIS OWN WORDS

Kyle:
  I took the proportions of the body form from the head, to shoulder, to a 90 degree angle which I believed to be the hem line of Natalee's skirt. I then took those proportions and matched them to the photo of Natalee with what she was last seen wearing. The proportions matched within an inch from head, to shoulder, to skirt line. Based on this comparison and with what we believed we saw in the Dec 29th video, Tim Miller contacted the family and told them the 99.9% comment. I told Tim not to do anything until we have forensic results back after the site is processed. Jan 7th we sampled the contents and in my opinion we found the skirt under the sand along with the other items The blue fabric was found right where the skirt is pictured. If it isn't her, it will forever haunt me as a major cosmic WTF.

Kyle:  I get done in the survey room backing up the ROV dive and head to the back deck to talk to the Polis divers and see what they sampled and see the Polis boat way in the distance heading away fast. John doesn't seem concerned at all, but I am very dissapointed, concerned, and burning inside because I have a feeling that I/we will never know what they took from the trap. That evening I talked to John asking when we plan on recovering the trap. Previously this was part of the talks and plan, but this time he doesn't seem concerned about ever looking into the trap further.  After John verbally BASHED me about the trap for what I said to Tim Miller about the sand body-form and that I believed her skirt was under the sand, John pretty much committed himself to the belief the trap wasn't what we were after. This shocked me because it was exactly what we were looking for- a fish trap lost at sea with human remains.

Kyle:    John is not a believer in the trap. He took ALE's word as gospel that it wasn't case related, yet never studied the videos or bothered to inquire further. He had plans on doing business with Aruba and in S. America and he didn't want to hurt any feelings by talks hinting at lack of complete trust and friendship.




Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #793 1/13/09
Post by: Tamikosmom on January 16, 2009, 11:56:54 PM
I have a question for everyone to ponder.  We all know how Beth, Dave, Jug and others in the family were very vocal when Natalee went missing.  Very much into searching for her and ready to expose what they went through in Aruba and the mess that was going on.  Here is the question.  Do you think that if there was any chance that Natalee was in that trap that the family would be so quiet?  We have heard nothing from the family.  I personally think that in all this turmoil about the crab trap I would take my cues from the family.  They do know more than us and yes they do know more than Kermit.


Hello Monekys,

Thank you Klaas for approving my membership.

I am the former Natalee's Freebirds Administrator.

To answer ldstlou - NO, I am not disgruntled.  No, I am no longer a member at that forum.  I resigned today.

That is an outstanding group of people, with hearts of gold.  I admire and respect each and every one of them.

It was merely time for me to move on.  I felt that we had achieved all we could there over the past 2 1/2 years, and all of the Freebirds - former and current - will always be in my heart.

Kermit did the right thing by making this information public at Beth Holloway's request (albeit 2 months after she asked us to do so thanks to the need to avoid litigation).

I just simply couldn't stand by any longer and watch the continued confusion perpetrated by two particular posters here.  Whether it's been unintentional or deliberate - it really needs to stop now.

Wingnut made an excellent point - and I feel it's one that's been largely overlooked - pressure needs to be applied to get the answers as to what happened to the human remains Aruba recovered from that fishing cage.

Monkeys - you all are stellar at banding together and getting action.

The FBI can only do so much - with their limited jurisdiction.  They can speak to and subpoena from the members of the Persistence their statements and video to ascertain what was found.

Then it becomes an international issue.  Our State Department is where the encouragement is needed - to put pressure on the Hague to get to the bottom of this.

But something must be done.  Natalee's family has been through enough, and that they (and Natalee) were treated so shabbily by the one resource they felt they could trust is utterly heart wrenching.

Thank you Monkeys for allowing me to be here - let's help Natalee's family get some justice!

At who's request?


Did i read that letter from Jen incorrectly?Kermit made this information public at Beth Holloway's request!Correct?Monkey's.


Correct Keepthefaith.

Janet


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #793 1/13/09
Post by: casa on January 16, 2009, 11:58:19 PM
I have a question for everyone to ponder.  We all know how Beth, Dave, Jug and others in the family were very vocal when Natalee went missing.  Very much into searching for her and ready to expose what they went through in Aruba and the mess that was going on.  Here is the question.  Do you think that if there was any chance that Natalee was in that trap that the family would be so quiet?  We have heard nothing from the family.  I personally think that in all this turmoil about the crab trap I would take my cues from the family.  They do know more than us and yes they do know more than Kermit.


Hello Monekys,

Thank you Klaas for approving my membership.

I am the former Natalee's Freebirds Administrator.

To answer ldstlou - NO, I am not disgruntled.  No, I am no longer a member at that forum.  I resigned today.

That is an outstanding group of people, with hearts of gold.  I admire and respect each and every one of them.

It was merely time for me to move on.  I felt that we had achieved all we could there over the past 2 1/2 years, and all of the Freebirds - former and current - will always be in my heart.

Kermit did the right thing by making this information public at Beth Holloway's request (albeit 2 months after she asked us to do so thanks to the need to avoid litigation).

I just simply couldn't stand by any longer and watch the continued confusion perpetrated by two particular posters here.  Whether it's been unintentional or deliberate - it really needs to stop now.

Wingnut made an excellent point - and I feel it's one that's been largely overlooked - pressure needs to be applied to get the answers as to what happened to the human remains Aruba recovered from that fishing cage.

Monkeys - you all are stellar at banding together and getting action.

The FBI can only do so much - with their limited jurisdiction.  They can speak to and subpoena from the members of the Persistence their statements and video to ascertain what was found.

Then it becomes an international issue.  Our State Department is where the encouragement is needed - to put pressure on the Hague to get to the bottom of this.

But something must be done.  Natalee's family has been through enough, and that they (and Natalee) were treated so shabbily by the one resource they felt they could trust is utterly heart wrenching.

Thank you Monkeys for allowing me to be here - let's help Natalee's family get some justice!

At who's request?

So I am supposing you are saying that Beth gave Kermit permission to post this information.  I am assuming that is the reason for what you quoted.  Has anyone heard this directly from Beth or are we just going on what others have said?  I respect everyone having his or her own opinion, but until I hear it from someone in the family from their mouths I choose to be skeptical.  There have been too many people supposedly speaking for the family.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #793 1/13/09
Post by: Keepthefaith on January 16, 2009, 11:58:22 PM
I have a question for everyone to ponder.  We all know how Beth, Dave, Jug and others in the family were very vocal when Natalee went missing.  Very much into searching for her and ready to expose what they went through in Aruba and the mess that was going on.  Here is the question.  Do you think that if there was any chance that Natalee was in that trap that the family would be so quiet?  We have heard nothing from the family.  I personally think that in all this turmoil about the crab trap I would take my cues from the family.  They do know more than us and yes they do know more than Kermit.

Casa ... if the family believes Kyle Kingman's own words regarding the happenings on board the Persistence ... happenings that had everything to do with John Silvetti's bowing to his own self-interests and ... assisting the ALE in the finale' to the great Aruban coverup ... then I have to believe that there is something in the works behind scenes.

Beth Holloway gave the Natalee's Freebirds permission to expose the words the Kyle Kingman posted on their private site and ... that is exactly what Kermit did.

Janet

+++++++


KYLE KINGMAN - IN HIS OWN WORDS

Kyle:
  I took the proportions of the body form from the head, to shoulder, to a 90 degree angle which I believed to be the hem line of Natalee's skirt. I then took those proportions and matched them to the photo of Natalee with what she was last seen wearing. The proportions matched within an inch from head, to shoulder, to skirt line. Based on this comparison and with what we believed we saw in the Dec 29th video, Tim Miller contacted the family and told them the 99.9% comment. I told Tim not to do anything until we have forensic results back after the site is processed. Jan 7th we sampled the contents and in my opinion we found the skirt under the sand along with the other items The blue fabric was found right where the skirt is pictured. If it isn't her, it will forever haunt me as a major cosmic WTF.

Kyle:  I get done in the survey room backing up the ROV dive and head to the back deck to talk to the Polis divers and see what they sampled and see the Polis boat way in the distance heading away fast. John doesn't seem concerned at all, but I am very dissapointed, concerned, and burning inside because I have a feeling that I/we will never know what they took from the trap. That evening I talked to John asking when we plan on recovering the trap. Previously this was part of the talks and plan, but this time he doesn't seem concerned about ever looking into the trap further.  After John verbally BASHED me about the trap for what I said to Tim Miller about the sand body-form and that I believed her skirt was under the sand, John pretty much committed himself to the belief the trap wasn't what we were after. This shocked me because it was exactly what we were looking for- a fish trap lost at sea with human remains.

Kyle:    John is not a believer in the trap. He took ALE's word as gospel that it wasn't case related, yet never studied the videos or bothered to inquire further. He had plans on doing business with Aruba and in S. America and he didn't want to hurt any feelings by talks hinting at lack of complete trust and friendship.




Your absolutely right Janet but it seems they continue to leave that FACT OUT.

"Kermit did the right thing by making this information public at Beth Holloway's request (albeit 2 months after she asked us to do so thanks to the need to avoid litigation)."

Who gave Kermit permission?Beth Holloway.




Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #793 1/13/09
Post by: San on January 16, 2009, 11:59:00 PM
I have a question for everyone to ponder.  We all know how Beth, Dave, Jug and others in the family were very vocal when Natalee went missing.  Very much into searching for her and ready to expose what they went through in Aruba and the mess that was going on.  Here is the question.  Do you think that if there was any chance that Natalee was in that trap that the family would be so quiet?  We have heard nothing from the family.  I personally think that in all this turmoil about the crab trap I would take my cues from the family.  They do know more than us and yes they do know more than Kermit.

Is this going to start another Kermit debate.  The family knows more than HotShot, CAPS, and others who are working behind the scenes to discredit Kermit.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #793 1/13/09
Post by: Tamikosmom on January 17, 2009, 12:00:29 AM
klassend
Re: Natalee Case Discussion #787 12/24/08 -
« Reply #411 on: December 30, 2008, 06:53:44 PM »


Sent to me by Natalee's Freebirds:

Please feel free (if you'd like) to post this at your board.
 
During the journey of the Persistence to Aruba, Kyle reached out and emailed with us.  During that time, one of the questions posed to him was regarding protocol if/when Natalee's remains were found.
 
Kyle's response was that he was unsure, but felt that would be settled before the search began.
 
The cautions were given to him about the lack of integrity on the part of Aruba's law enforcement, prosecutor's office, and its judiciary.
 
Contact with Kyle continued throughout the duration of the search by the Persistence.
 
Once back home, Kyle asked us for our help.  He was very concerned about the activities that transpired during their search - specifically surrounding the find of the fishing cage and its contents.  Kyle wanted our help in presenting this information in a factual way, to then be given to Natalee's family. 
 
This was March 18, 2008.  At that time, Kyle assured us he had just recently sent the images from the Dec 30th and Jan 7th dives to the FBI, but had never received a response from them.
 
We later found that to be false.
 
Also at that time, Beth's brother saw the images Kyle had shared with us - but none of the detail he shared later.

We compiled the images Kyle presented us, along with his opinions and the facts surrounding the sequence of events regarding that fishing cage.  Kyle stated he would be getting in touch with Beth Holloway.
 
We later found out that never happened.

At this time, Kyle shared with us the broadcast networks he had approached in February, in an attempt to sell these images to the highest bidder.
 
This didn't concern us greatly at that time - as we were under the impression US law enforcement and Natalee's family had already been made aware of their find.
 
Approximately May 2008 Kyle began dodging questions for details (we had asked for names of Aruban police and divers to be included in our documentation of these events), hedging on moving forward with this, and then he completely disappeared from our board.
 
During that time, we learned Kyle had never contacted Beth, or Dave, or the FBI with this information.
 
We put our original plan into motion - that of presenting this information in a clear and concise manner, and we sent it to Beth Holloway.
 
Beth was disturbed, needed time to digest the information, and wanted to share it with someone she trusts.
 
When Tim Miller was returning to Aruba this past fall, Beth gave us permission to release this information publicly.
 
At that point, we gave it to John Kelly, Carmen Adams with the FBI, and got it ready for public consumption.
 
The next step was to publish this information at our blog.
 
One of our members felt we were betraying Kyle in doing so, contacted him, and he re-surfaced at our site with threats of litigation against us - stating this was his "intellectual property" and we could not use it.
 
That of course concerned us greatly - as none of us could afford to be sued.
 
He also stated at that time, Luis Shaefer had just recently sold the rights of the video of these images to a broadcast company for the purposes of a documentary.
 
We contacted legal counsel and were advised to keep our distance from any Persistence crew member, in the face of potential obstruction/accessory charges.
 
At this point, one of our members decided to brace for the possibility of civil litigation, resigned from our membership to protect it from same, and posted what he knows to be factual at SM.
 
Kyle did tell us human remains were found in that fish cage.
 
Kyle did tell us about John Silvetti's intent to open an office on the island of Aruba, to enable him ease in conducting business in South America, and Aruba.
 
Kyle also told us of John's absolute refusal to give that fish cage and its contents any credence - before even it was inspected on Jan 7th.
 
Kyle told us in no uncertain terms that Tim Miller and Dateline were abruptly removed from the Persistence on Dec 30, resulting in only Persistence crew being aboard between that date and the Jan 7 dive of the Arubans.
 
Nothing that was posted at SM by kermit was incorrect, out of context, or in any way false.  

Regards,
 
Former Natalee's Freebirds Administrator
Natalee and her family deserve justice - and we will not let up until they have it!

http://scaredmonkeys.net/index.php?topic=4269.msg603349#msg603349


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #793 1/13/09
Post by: casa on January 17, 2009, 12:02:48 AM
Beth nor anyone else in the family has come out and accused Kyle, Silvetti or anyone else of any wrong doing.  They have not said that they believe that Natalee was in that trap.  I am just stating until I hear it from one of them I will be skeptical.  I am very suspicious of anyone who speaks for the family when the family is silent.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #793 1/13/09
Post by: wreck on January 17, 2009, 12:02:48 AM
I have a question for everyone to ponder.  We all know how Beth, Dave, Jug and others in the family were very vocal when Natalee went missing.  Very much into searching for her and ready to expose what they went through in Aruba and the mess that was going on.  Here is the question.  Do you think that if there was any chance that Natalee was in that trap that the family would be so quiet?  We have heard nothing from the family.  I personally think that in all this turmoil about the crab trap I would take my cues from the family.  They do know more than us and yes they do know more than Kermit.
Yes, I think they DO have reasonto be quiet about it. You can't keep "tipping your hand" before you nail the perps.


Who do you think are the perps here?  Kyle, Silvetti, Aruba? 

Joran, first and foremost. Aruba, second -- for the cover-up. The Persistence crew - after the fact.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #793 1/13/09
Post by: San on January 17, 2009, 12:02:56 AM
HERE IS MY QUESTION.  WHY ARE PEOPLE SO BENT ON DISCREDITING KERMIT.  WHERE IS THE PROOF THAT PEOPLE ARE SAYING KERMIT IS LYING.

POST THE DAMN PROOF.

I DON'T WANT TO HERE WELL I TALKED TO THIS PERSON AND THEY SAID THIS.  TELL THE PERSON TO POST JUST LIKE KERMIT POSTS AND BACKS UP WHAT SHE POSTS.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #793 1/13/09
Post by: Keepthefaith on January 17, 2009, 12:07:21 AM
HERE IS MY QUESTION.  WHY ARE PEOPLE SO BENT ON DISCREDITING KERMIT.  WHERE IS THE PROOF THAT PEOPLE ARE SAYING KERMIT IS LYING.

POST THE DAMN PROOF.

I DON'T WANT TO HERE WELL I TALKED TO THIS PERSON AND THEY SAID THIS.  TELL THE PERSON TO POST JUST LIKE KERMIT POSTS AND BACKS UP WHAT SHE POSTS.

We're all here to discuss these matters with Kyle(OE),as well as Caps if they'd like to CHAT.Have a feeling they won't be coming out of there private confine's...


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #793 1/13/09
Post by: casa on January 17, 2009, 12:07:39 AM
I have a question for everyone to ponder.  We all know how Beth, Dave, Jug and others in the family were very vocal when Natalee went missing.  Very much into searching for her and ready to expose what they went through in Aruba and the mess that was going on.  Here is the question.  Do you think that if there was any chance that Natalee was in that trap that the family would be so quiet?  We have heard nothing from the family.  I personally think that in all this turmoil about the crab trap I would take my cues from the family.  They do know more than us and yes they do know more than Kermit.

Is this going to start another Kermit debate.  The family knows more than HotShot, CAPS, and others who are working behind the scenes to discredit Kermit.

I have no desire to start another Kermit debate.  I agree that the family knows more than Hotshot, CAPS and others.  I also believe that the family knows more than Kermit.  I was stating my opinion and I do realize that it may not be the same as those remaining on the Natalee thread but I thought we were all still entitled to our opinion. 


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #793 1/13/09
Post by: Tamikosmom on January 17, 2009, 12:08:22 AM
HERE IS MY QUESTION.  WHY ARE PEOPLE SO BENT ON DISCREDITING KERMIT.  WHERE IS THE PROOF THAT PEOPLE ARE SAYING KERMIT IS LYING.

POST THE DAMN PROOF.

I DON'T WANT TO HERE WELL I TALKED TO THIS PERSON AND THEY SAID THIS.  TELL THE PERSON TO POST JUST LIKE KERMIT POSTS AND BACKS UP WHAT SHE POSTS.

Thanks you San.

My thoughts exactly.

Janet


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #793 1/13/09
Post by: San on January 17, 2009, 12:10:39 AM
HERE IS MY QUESTION.  WHY ARE PEOPLE SO BENT ON DISCREDITING KERMIT.  WHERE IS THE PROOF THAT PEOPLE ARE SAYING KERMIT IS LYING.

POST THE DAMN PROOF.

I DON'T WANT TO HERE WELL I TALKED TO THIS PERSON AND THEY SAID THIS.  TELL THE PERSON TO POST JUST LIKE KERMIT POSTS AND BACKS UP WHAT SHE POSTS.

We're all here to discuss these matters with Kyle(OE),as well as Caps if they'd like to CHAT.Have a feeling they won't be coming out of there private confine's...

Kyle likes to hide in his little hidey hole and tell others what to do.

He is the one who made the mistake and opened his big mouth for everyone to see.

And he is still making the same mistake.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #793 1/13/09
Post by: Keepthefaith on January 17, 2009, 12:10:44 AM
Where's the Persistence from?


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #793 1/13/09
Post by: Keepthefaith on January 17, 2009, 12:11:52 AM
Where's the Persistence from?

Casa?


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #793 1/13/09
Post by: casa on January 17, 2009, 12:12:15 AM
HERE IS MY QUESTION.  WHY ARE PEOPLE SO BENT ON DISCREDITING KERMIT.  WHERE IS THE PROOF THAT PEOPLE ARE SAYING KERMIT IS LYING.

POST THE DAMN PROOF.

I DON'T WANT TO HERE WELL I TALKED TO THIS PERSON AND THEY SAID THIS.  TELL THE PERSON TO POST JUST LIKE KERMIT POSTS AND BACKS UP WHAT SHE POSTS.

Excuse me.  I did not say that Kermit is lying.  I said I choose to believe what Natalee's family says and until they say that this is true I will remain skeptical.  I never said anyone said anything.  I stated my opinion and apparently that is not what I am supposed to do.  Im not sure why you are so upset. 


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #793 1/13/09
Post by: wreck on January 17, 2009, 12:12:21 AM
I have a question for everyone to ponder.  We all know how Beth, Dave, Jug and others in the family were very vocal when Natalee went missing.  Very much into searching for her and ready to expose what they went through in Aruba and the mess that was going on.  Here is the question.  Do you think that if there was any chance that Natalee was in that trap that the family would be so quiet?  We have heard nothing from the family.  I personally think that in all this turmoil about the crab trap I would take my cues from the family.  They do know more than us and yes they do know more than Kermit.

Is this going to start another Kermit debate.  The family knows more than HotShot, CAPS, and others who are working behind the scenes to discredit Kermit.

I have no desire to start another Kermit debate.  I agree that the family knows more than Hotshot, CAPS and others.  I also believe that the family knows more than Kermit.  I was stating my opinion and I do realize that it may not be the same as those remaining on the Natalee thread but I thought we were all still entitled to our opinion. 
You are welcome to YOUR own opinion -- I'm just telling you MINE.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #793 1/13/09
Post by: klaasend on January 17, 2009, 12:14:11 AM
I have a question for everyone to ponder.  We all know how Beth, Dave, Jug and others in the family were very vocal when Natalee went missing.  Very much into searching for her and ready to expose what they went through in Aruba and the mess that was going on.  Here is the question.  Do you think that if there was any chance that Natalee was in that trap that the family would be so quiet?  We have heard nothing from the family.  I personally think that in all this turmoil about the crab trap I would take my cues from the family.  They do know more than us and yes they do know more than Kermit.

Is this going to start another Kermit debate.  The family knows more than HotShot, CAPS, and others who are working behind the scenes to discredit Kermit.

I have no desire to start another Kermit debate.  I agree that the family knows more than Hotshot, CAPS and others.  I also believe that the family knows more than Kermit.  I was stating my opinion and I do realize that it may not be the same as those remaining on the Natalee thread but I thought we were all still entitled to our opinion. 

Everyone is entitiled to their own opinions.  The only problem is your opinion is that we shouldn't be discussing the possibility of wrong doing by Kyle or the Persiistence crew.  So your opinion is that our opinion is wrong and shouldn't be considered.

What should we discuss?  Should be discuss the weather in Aruba, Alabama, Arkansas or Mississippi?  Just curious what your suggestion might be? 


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #793 1/13/09
Post by: casa on January 17, 2009, 12:14:25 AM
San, I am not defending Kyle.  I think he ran his mouth when he should not have.  Keepthefaith, they are from Lafayette, LA.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #793 1/13/09
Post by: klaasend on January 17, 2009, 12:15:28 AM
Where's the Persistence from?

Louisiana I believe


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #793 1/13/09
Post by: Tamikosmom on January 17, 2009, 12:15:39 AM
I have a question for everyone to ponder.  We all know how Beth, Dave, Jug and others in the family were very vocal when Natalee went missing.  Very much into searching for her and ready to expose what they went through in Aruba and the mess that was going on.  Here is the question.  Do you think that if there was any chance that Natalee was in that trap that the family would be so quiet?  We have heard nothing from the family.  I personally think that in all this turmoil about the crab trap I would take my cues from the family.  They do know more than us and yes they do know more than Kermit.

Is this going to start another Kermit debate.  The family knows more than HotShot, CAPS, and others who are working behind the scenes to discredit Kermit.

I have no desire to start another Kermit debate.  I agree that the family knows more than Hotshot, CAPS and others.  I also believe that the family knows more than Kermit.  I was stating my opinion and I do realize that it may not be the same as those remaining on the Natalee thread but I thought we were all still entitled to our opinion. 

Kermit does not claim to know anything.  Kermit is exposing posts with Beth Holloway's permission which were submitted to the Natalee's Freebirds by Kyle Kingman ... post that reveal the happenings encompassing on board the Persistence undertaking.

Either you believe Kyle Kingman's words or you do not .... Kyle Kingman who held a professional position aboard the Persistence throughout the undertaking.

Janet

++++++

Kyle Kingman
Senior Geophysical Project Manager at Alpine Ocean Seismic Survey Inc.
Greater New York City Area

 
Current
Senior Geophysical Operations Manager at Alpine Ocean Seismic Survey Inc.
 
Past
Manager at Kingman Geophysical Solutions
 
Education
Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey-New Brunswick
Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey-New Brunswick
 
Industry
Oil & Energy
_______
 
Kyle Kingman’s Summary

Kyle Kingman’s Specialties:
 
Project Management, Sonar Acquisition, hydrographic survey, data processing, remote sensing data analysis.
 
http://www.linkedin.com/pub/b/65/464

+++++++


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #793 1/13/09
Post by: San on January 17, 2009, 12:15:46 AM
I have a question for everyone to ponder.  We all know how Beth, Dave, Jug and others in the family were very vocal when Natalee went missing.  Very much into searching for her and ready to expose what they went through in Aruba and the mess that was going on.  Here is the question.  Do you think that if there was any chance that Natalee was in that trap that the family would be so quiet?  We have heard nothing from the family.  I personally think that in all this turmoil about the crab trap I would take my cues from the family.  They do know more than us and yes they do know more than Kermit.

Is this going to start another Kermit debate.  The family knows more than HotShot, CAPS, and others who are working behind the scenes to discredit Kermit.

I have no desire to start another Kermit debate.  I agree that the family knows more than Hotshot, CAPS and others.  I also believe that the family knows more than Kermit.  I was stating my opinion and I do realize that it may not be the same as those remaining on the Natalee thread but I thought we were all still entitled to our opinion. 

This is fine but when making a post like you just did you singled out Kermit.  We have had a few weeks of people coming on and trying to bash Kermit.

I will stand by an American trying to find Justice for Natalee before I ever stand with an Aruban.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #793 1/13/09
Post by: Tamikosmom on January 17, 2009, 12:18:24 AM
San, I am not defending Kyle.  I think he ran his mouth when he should not have.   Keepthefaith, they are from Lafayette, LA.


I ... for one ... am thankful the Kyle "ran his mouth".  The truth encompassing the deception of the Persistence undertaking was exposed.

Janet


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #793 1/13/09
Post by: casa on January 17, 2009, 12:18:31 AM
I have a question for everyone to ponder.  We all know how Beth, Dave, Jug and others in the family were very vocal when Natalee went missing.  Very much into searching for her and ready to expose what they went through in Aruba and the mess that was going on.  Here is the question.  Do you think that if there was any chance that Natalee was in that trap that the family would be so quiet?  We have heard nothing from the family.  I personally think that in all this turmoil about the crab trap I would take my cues from the family.  They do know more than us and yes they do know more than Kermit.

Is this going to start another Kermit debate.  The family knows more than HotShot, CAPS, and others who are working behind the scenes to discredit Kermit.

I have no desire to start another Kermit debate.  I agree that the family knows more than Hotshot, CAPS and others.  I also believe that the family knows more than Kermit.  I was stating my opinion and I do realize that it may not be the same as those remaining on the Natalee thread but I thought we were all still entitled to our opinion. 

Everyone is entitiled to their own opinions.  The only problem is your opinion is that we shouldn't be discussing the possibility of wrong doing by Kyle or the Persiistence crew.  So your opinion is that our opinion is wrong and shouldn't be considered.

What should we discuss?  Should be discuss the weather in Aruba, Alabama, Arkansas or Mississippi?  Just curious what your suggestion might be? 

Apparently you read more into what I said than was there.  I did not say we should not be discussing Kyle, etc.  I did not say your opinion was wrong but apparently mine is.  Please don't look for things in my posts that are not there.  That is why I have abstained from posting because I knew my anything I said would be twisted.  I say lets hear something from the family before we hang people!


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #793 1/13/09
Post by: San on January 17, 2009, 12:22:36 AM
San, I am not defending Kyle.  I think he ran his mouth when he should not have.   Keepthefaith, they are from Lafayette, LA.


I ... for one ... am thankful the Kyle "ran his mouth".  The truth encompassing the deception of the Persistence undertaking was exposed.

Janet

Yes like I always say keep talking.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #793 1/13/09
Post by: wreck on January 17, 2009, 12:22:45 AM
I have a question for everyone to ponder.  We all know how Beth, Dave, Jug and others in the family were very vocal when Natalee went missing.  Very much into searching for her and ready to expose what they went through in Aruba and the mess that was going on.  Here is the question.  Do you think that if there was any chance that Natalee was in that trap that the family would be so quiet?  We have heard nothing from the family.  I personally think that in all this turmoil about the crab trap I would take my cues from the family.  They do know more than us and yes they do know more than Kermit.

Is this going to start another Kermit debate.  The family knows more than HotShot, CAPS, and others who are working behind the scenes to discredit Kermit.

I have no desire to start another Kermit debate.  I agree that the family knows more than Hotshot, CAPS and others.  I also believe that the family knows more than Kermit.  I was stating my opinion and I do realize that it may not be the same as those remaining on the Natalee thread but I thought we were all still entitled to our opinion. 

Everyone is entitiled to their own opinions.  The only problem is your opinion is that we shouldn't be discussing the possibility of wrong doing by Kyle or the Persiistence crew.  So your opinion is that our opinion is wrong and shouldn't be considered.

What should we discuss?  Should be discuss the weather in Aruba, Alabama, Arkansas or Mississippi?  Just curious what your suggestion might be? 

Apparently you read more into what I said than was there.  I did not say we should not be discussing Kyle, etc.  I did not say your opinion was wrong but apparently mine is.  Please don't look for things in my posts that are not there.  That is why I have abstained from posting because I knew my anything I said would be twisted.  I say lets hear something from the family before we hang people!
They are "hanging" themselves.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #793 1/13/09
Post by: Keepthefaith on January 17, 2009, 12:24:39 AM
San, I am not defending Kyle.  I think he ran his mouth when he should not have.   Keepthefaith, they are from Lafayette, LA.


I ... for one ... am thankful the Kyle "ran his mouth".  The truth encompassing the deception of the Persistence undertaking was exposed.

Janet

Yes like I always say keep talking.

Yes indeed!I think the continued discussion about the Persistence is very good.The more Monkey's talk,the more Monkey's want to come out and talk. ::MonkeyCool::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #793 1/13/09
Post by: casa on January 17, 2009, 12:25:36 AM
My main problem with Kyle is that I think he enjoyed the attention he got from posting on the forums.  I think he was willing to post whatever made him seem important.  That is why I have a problem with what he posted.  I'm not so sure that any of it is factual.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #793 1/13/09
Post by: klaasend on January 17, 2009, 12:27:33 AM
I have a question for everyone to ponder.  We all know how Beth, Dave, Jug and others in the family were very vocal when Natalee went missing.  Very much into searching for her and ready to expose what they went through in Aruba and the mess that was going on.  Here is the question.  Do you think that if there was any chance that Natalee was in that trap that the family would be so quiet?  We have heard nothing from the family.  I personally think that in all this turmoil about the crab trap I would take my cues from the family.  They do know more than us and yes they do know more than Kermit.

Is this going to start another Kermit debate.  The family knows more than HotShot, CAPS, and others who are working behind the scenes to discredit Kermit.

I have no desire to start another Kermit debate.  I agree that the family knows more than Hotshot, CAPS and others.  I also believe that the family knows more than Kermit.  I was stating my opinion and I do realize that it may not be the same as those remaining on the Natalee thread but I thought we were all still entitled to our opinion. 

Everyone is entitiled to their own opinions.  The only problem is your opinion is that we shouldn't be discussing the possibility of wrong doing by Kyle or the Persiistence crew.  So your opinion is that our opinion is wrong and shouldn't be considered.

What should we discuss?  Should be discuss the weather in Aruba, Alabama, Arkansas or Mississippi?  Just curious what your suggestion might be? 

Apparently you read more into what I said than was there.  I did not say we should not be discussing Kyle, etc.  I did not say your opinion was wrong but apparently mine is.  Please don't look for things in my posts that are not there.  That is why I have abstained from posting because I knew my anything I said would be twisted.  I say lets hear something from the family before we hang people!

Ok, I didn't know we were hanging people.  Kyle ran his mouth and his posts/comments were brought to SM.  Kyle is more than welcome to counter and state his side but he chooses to remain quiet.  Maybe Kyle was BSing about everything, I don't know.  I do know that what he said is pretty damning. 



Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #793 1/13/09
Post by: Keepthefaith on January 17, 2009, 12:28:24 AM
My main problem with Kyle is that I think he enjoyed the attention he got from posting on the forums.  I think he was willing to post whatever made him seem important.  That is why I have a problem with what he posted.  I'm not so sure that any of it is factual.

So you don't believe Kyle.So he made it all up to get people to think that Natalee was potentially in the Trap?Now that's pretty sick,and if it's TRUE,Kyle is a despicable human being and,and..... ::MonkeyNoNo::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #793 1/13/09
Post by: San on January 17, 2009, 12:29:40 AM
My main problem with Kyle is that I think he enjoyed the attention he got from posting on the forums.  I think he was willing to post whatever made him seem important.  That is why I have a problem with what he posted.  I'm not so sure that any of it is factual.

Well then shame on him for playing with someones life.

Who died and left him boss to make these kind of decisions.

It is hurtful towards the family.  This is not a game.  These are lives he is playing with.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #793 1/13/09
Post by: Keepthefaith on January 17, 2009, 12:29:58 AM
Gotta Chat-n-Run! ::MonkeyLaugh:: Will return shortly...



Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #793 1/13/09
Post by: casa on January 17, 2009, 12:31:25 AM
If you see what I posted as you were posting you will see what i said about Kyle.  I have no proof that he loved hearing himself but in my opinion he should have been more concerned with what he was doing rather than posting on blogs as he apparently posted in more places than SM


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #793 1/13/09
Post by: Keepthefaith on January 17, 2009, 12:32:07 AM
My main problem with Kyle is that I think he enjoyed the attention he got from posting on the forums.  I think he was willing to post whatever made him seem important.  That is why I have a problem with what he posted.  I'm not so sure that any of it is factual.

Well then shame on him for playing with someones life.

Who died and left him boss to make these kind of decisions.

It is hurtful towards the family.  This is not a game.  These are lives he is playing with.

EXACTLY San.It's beyond hurtful.To imply someone's MURDERED daughter was potentially in a trap in the middle of the ocean "IF" she wasn't and people still defend and talk to this person ::MonkeyNoNo:: ::MonkeyShocked::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #793 1/13/09
Post by: casa on January 17, 2009, 12:33:27 AM
My main problem with Kyle is that I think he enjoyed the attention he got from posting on the forums.  I think he was willing to post whatever made him seem important.  That is why I have a problem with what he posted.  I'm not so sure that any of it is factual.

So you don't believe Kyle.So he made it all up to get people to think that Natalee was potentially in the Trap?Now that's pretty sick,and if it's TRUE,Kyle is a despicable human being and,and..... ::MonkeyNoNo::

San and keepthefaith, I have no proof of that.  Just my opinon.  That is the vibe I got from reading what he was posting.  I'm not sure what we can believe of what he said.  Of course, I could be all wrong, but that is the feeling I got from him.  You notice he was the only one we heard from.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #793 1/13/09
Post by: Tamikosmom on January 17, 2009, 12:35:25 AM
My main problem with Kyle is that I think he enjoyed the attention he got from posting on the forums.  I think he was willing to post whatever made him seem important.  That is why I have a problem with what he posted.  I'm not so sure that any of it is factual.

The Natalee's Freebirds is/was a private forum ... no exposure.  If you read the former Natalee's Freebirds' administrator (Jen) email to Klaas ... she explains that Kyle joined the Natalee's Freebirds with the intention of receiving assistance in compiling a document of the happenings on board the Persistence ... a document that could be submitted to Beth Holloway.  Somewhere along the way Kyle had a change of heart ...

Casa ... I posted the Jen's email which Klaas posted above ... please read.

Janet


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #793 1/13/09
Post by: casa on January 17, 2009, 12:36:03 AM
I also agree that if that is what he did it is the lowest of the low!  I just never trusted his posting while he was supposed to be looking for Natalee.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #793 1/13/09
Post by: San on January 17, 2009, 12:39:21 AM
I also agree that if that is what he did it is the lowest of the low!  I just never trusted his posting while he was supposed to be looking for Natalee.

Exactly you never trusted his posting while he was on here at SM.  But when he posted in a place that was supposed to be private why lie.  No need to lie when you think it's a private discussion. You would lie if you thought everyone was reading.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #793 1/13/09
Post by: casa on January 17, 2009, 12:41:30 AM
I also agree that if that is what he did it is the lowest of the low!  I just never trusted his posting while he was supposed to be looking for Natalee.

Exactly you never trusted his posting while he was on here at SM.  But when he posted in a place that was supposed to be private why lie.  No need to lie when you think it's a private discussion. You would lie if you thought everyone was reading.

But he was still getting attention from the ones who posted and could read there.  I don't think it was the reading that he loved but the response he got from the posters who responded to him.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #793 1/13/09
Post by: Tamikosmom on January 17, 2009, 12:44:39 AM
My main problem with Kyle is that I think he enjoyed the attention he got from posting on the forums.  I think he was willing to post whatever made him seem important.  That is why I have a problem with what he posted.  I'm not so sure that any of it is factual.

So you don't believe Kyle.So he made it all up to get people to think that Natalee was potentially in the Trap?Now that's pretty sick,and if it's TRUE,Kyle is a despicable human being and,and..... ::MonkeyNoNo::

San and keepthefaith, I have no proof of that.  Just my opinon.  That is the vibe I got from reading what he was posting.  I'm not sure what we can believe of what he said.  Of course, I could be all wrong, but that is the feeling I got from him.  You notice he was the only one we heard from.

Kyle Kingman (ROV) and Tim Trahan (diver) were the only crew members who held positions of expertise on board the Persistence that would give them a perspective of the truth encompassing the trap/cage.  It was Kyle Kingman and Tim Trahan along with the owner of the Persistence who were attempting to make deals with the major networks.  However ... Tim Trahan did not "run his mouth" on a private site.  Tim Trahan did not reveal the ROV images on a private site.

Janet

++++++++

KYLE KINGMAN - IN HIS OWN WORDS

Kyle:
  On the other hand, those differences has also caused a rift between Tim Trahan/Louis and myself with John (although John and I remain close friends and colleagues). The result is Tim, Louis and I are moving forward and John is left out of the loop.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #793 1/13/09
Post by: Tamikosmom on January 17, 2009, 12:51:59 AM
I also agree that if that is what he did it is the lowest of the low!  I just never trusted his posting while he was supposed to be looking for Natalee.

casa ... I believe that Kyle Kingman intentions were honorable when he first approached the Natalee's Freebirds for assistance in compiling a document of his observations on board the Persistence.  It was Kyle's intention that this compilation was given to Beth Holloway.

I suspect that his hookup with Tim T. and Louis S. in regards to selling the Persistence story to a major network is when the change of heart occured and ... the attempt at preventing the release of the doument occured.

A Monkey Freebird can correct me if I am wrong.

Janet


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #793 1/13/09
Post by: Anna on January 17, 2009, 12:53:05 AM
I don't know if those were Natalee's remains in the trap or not.  I still also see a service cap.  But it appears to have been on the chest area of the photo of Natalee that Kyle superimposed on the contents of the trap.

He then said that the fabric tested was from what would have been the skirt area.  Kyle also stated that there were human remains in that trap.  Whose?

The reason I don't know and may never know is that only ALE had access to the contents of the trap and only ALE took the samples.

They have a history of making evidence disappear.  Not only has this happened in Natalee's case but others like Alex Matthews.

It is unfortunate that Kyle made those statements that there were human remains for a fact.  It is unfortunate that only ALE had access to the contents of the trap.  We forewarned this was not a good thing to have happen.

Now I don't see how anybody will ever know what was or was not in the trap.  It's very hard to just take the word of ALE after all that has transpired.  Example:  blood to chocolate?

Just very frustrating all the way around!  Maddening, even.  Why did they do all that then allow only ALE to reap the results of all those efforts?



Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #793 1/13/09
Post by: casa on January 17, 2009, 12:55:24 AM
The statements that we have of what went on are from Kyle.  I'm not so sure that he was entirely truthful so I am not putting too much credence in what he said happened on the boat and what they found. There has just been so much misinformation in the case and it continues.  Makes me sick!  Im going to call it a night. 


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #793 1/13/09
Post by: Tamikosmom on January 17, 2009, 12:57:17 AM
Casa ... the following is a post of Kyle Kingman that was posted at the SM site.

Janet

++++++

KYLE KINGMAN - IN HIS OWN WORDS

oceanexploration
Re: Natalee Case Discussion #744 3/19 -
« Reply #201 on: March 19, 2008, 08:21:47 PM »


Janet, you aren't even a bad dream, let alone a nightmare.  We had little option other than to have the Aruban dive division recover the samples and bring them back under their care.  Remember we are Americans working in Aruban waters, subject to their laws, invitation, and blessing.  Our hands are tied for the most part. I personally was extremely uncomfortable with the chain of custody, being that we weren't a part of it, but I was powerless to do anything about it.  The samples were photographed in detail by one Aruban diver and the other two investigated the contents of the trap, the dimensions, the rigging, and what surrounded the trap.  From the video, it looked like they did a diligent and careful job with the samples and the underwater photography.  I don't know who has these pictures, but I must assume ALE

http://scaredmonkeys.net/index.php?topic=2721.msg366857;topicseen#msg366857


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #793 1/13/09
Post by: Tamikosmom on January 17, 2009, 01:00:47 AM
Good Night Monkeys!  Good Night Zookeepers!

This time I mean it if I value my 43 year marriage.

 ::MonkeyHaHa::

Janet
10:00 PM PT



Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #793 1/13/09
Post by: hotping on January 17, 2009, 01:04:52 AM
Good Night Janet!


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #793 1/13/09
Post by: texasmom on January 17, 2009, 01:08:23 AM
Good Night Monkeys!  Good Night Zookeepers!

This time I mean it if I value my 43 year marriage.

 ::MonkeyHaHa::

Janet
10:00 PM PT




Goodnight Janet!   ::MonkeyCool::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #793 1/13/09
Post by: Anna on January 17, 2009, 01:08:26 AM
I think Kyle's change of heart came about when he discovered John Silvetti was the Project Manager on something he was working on.  He is in a specialty field and likely to run into the same people over and over.  Don't think he would like Silvetti to read what he said about him.

Big OOPS there, IMOO.  He is very young and no one likes to get caught trashing the boss.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #793 1/13/09
Post by: texasmom on January 17, 2009, 01:16:54 AM
 ::MonkeyShocked::  ::MonkeyNoNo::

This is the tomorrow's edition of Awe Mainta frontpage.  I think that it says a Tourist death.

The file is not there yet to download, as soon as it is I'll post the story.

http://awemainta.com/home/index.php?option=com_docman&task=cat_view&gid=37&Itemid=45

(http://www.awemainta.com/home/images/stories/pagina_principal/17jan2009front.jpg)


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #793 1/13/09
Post by: klaasend on January 17, 2009, 01:17:53 AM
Nite Casa and Janet


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #793 1/13/09
Post by: hotping on January 17, 2009, 01:20:14 AM
::MonkeyShocked::  ::MonkeyNoNo::

This is the tomorrow's edition of Awe Mainta frontpage.  I think that it says a Tourist death.

The file is not there yet to download, as soon as it is I'll post the story.

http://awemainta.com/home/index.php?option=com_docman&task=cat_view&gid=37&Itemid=45

(http://www.awemainta.com/home/images/stories/pagina_principal/17jan2009front.jpg)
Thanks TM! Good to see You this evening!  ::MonkeyCool::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #793 1/13/09
Post by: klaasend on January 17, 2009, 01:23:46 AM
::MonkeyShocked::  ::MonkeyNoNo::

This is the tomorrow's edition of Awe Mainta frontpage.  I think that it says a Tourist death.

The file is not there yet to download, as soon as it is I'll post the story.

http://awemainta.com/home/index.php?option=com_docman&task=cat_view&gid=37&Itemid=45

(http://www.awemainta.com/home/images/stories/pagina_principal/17jan2009front.jpg)



Homber a horta turista na Renaissance  
Policial 
Friday, 16 January 2009 - 00:06
 
Diabierna marduga un par di turista tabata relaha na pool deck di Renaissance Hotel. Na un dado momento nan a ripara cu tin un persona stranjo tabata den nan tas y a logra di bay cu algun cos for di e sitio. Ora cu e turistanan a mira bon nan por a ripara cu e persona en cuestion a bay cu placa y un camera. Polis a yega na e sitio pa asina wordo informa door di e miembrona di seguridad. Despues di a wordo informa Polis a bay tira bista den vecindario pa mira si nan por a topa cu e malechor aki. Nos por menciona cu e casonan aki di ladronica riba turista ultimo simanan ta lantando cabes enormemente. Tambe nos tin informacion cu na algun hotel hasta e mesun empleadonan ta hortando pertenencia di nan huespednan. Aki nan ta horta e articulo y purba di bendele pa haja placa. Den algun di e casonan aki nos por informa si cu tin varios arresto a tuma lugar. Esaki sigur ta algo di lamenta.

(http://www.24ora.com/images/stories/news/2009/january16/P1010004.JPG)
 
Through translator:

man owing to steal tourist at renaissance

friday, 16 january 2009 - 00:06 diabierna marduga one pair of tourist was relaha at pool deck of renaissance hotel. at one dado instant they owing to ripara cu have one person stranjo was in they bag y owing to succeed of bay cu some cos for of the sitio. hour cu the turistanan owing to see good they can owing to ripara cu the person provided that cuestion owing to bay cu coin y one camera. police owing to arrive at the sitio for so wordo informa door of the miembrona of seguridad. after of owing to wordo informa police owing to bay throw view in vecindario for see if they can owing to come across cu the malechor here. we can menciona cu the casonan here of ladronica on tourist ultimo simanan is lantando cabes enormemente. also we have informacion cu at some hotel even the same empleadonan is hortando pertenencia of they huespednan. here they're steal the articulo y try of bendele for haja coin. in some of the casonan here we can informa if cu have several arresto did take lugar. this assure is algo of lamenta come across

http://www.24ora.com/content/view/7074/8/#jc_allComments


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #793 1/13/09
Post by: texasmom on January 17, 2009, 01:31:54 AM
1/17/2009 Awe Mainta Front Page

http://awemainta.com/home/

(http://i21.photobucket.com/albums/b258/texasmom55/Misc%20News%204/01172009AweMaintaFP.jpg)

after of 9 day in hospital tourist owing to fayece.

day 1 of january, one tourist mericano, for 11.40 of night, supuestamente bao of influencia of alcohol y also of drugs, owing to cay for of first floor of one hotel in centro of oranjestad y owing to fractura his arm. police y ambulance owing to arrive n’e sitio, y owing to transporta the tourist henry matthew charles, naci at estados unidos day 19 of july 1972, for poli for tratamento, already cu his arm owing to stay fractura. sinembargo, by of the caida, the have to owing to achieve golpinan more earnest, because; cu day 10 of january, police owing to achieve informacion cu after cu past owing to stay interna all the dianan ey in cuido intensivo, past owing to fayece, debi n’e golpinan cu past owing to achieve. dr. croes owing to constata dead. the curpa will wordo send corsow for creamacion. paz at his restonan.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #793 1/13/09
Post by: klaasend on January 17, 2009, 01:41:58 AM
OK, this American tourist a 36yr old guy died from a broken arm?  I'm sure it's more than that but I'm tired.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #793 1/13/09
Post by: texasmom on January 17, 2009, 01:43:00 AM
I "think" it says that on the 1st of January, the American tourist Henry Matthew Charles was under the influence of alcohol and drugs when he jumped from the first floor of a hotel and broke his arm.  He was taken to the hospital for treatment, and died nine days later.

If I have this wrong, please correct me.  TIA


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #793 1/13/09
Post by: texasmom on January 17, 2009, 01:45:49 AM
::MonkeyShocked::  ::MonkeyNoNo::

This is the tomorrow's edition of Awe Mainta frontpage.  I think that it says a Tourist death.

The file is not there yet to download, as soon as it is I'll post the story.

http://awemainta.com/home/index.php?option=com_docman&task=cat_view&gid=37&Itemid=45

Thanks TM! Good to see You this evening!  ::MonkeyCool::

You're welcome hotping.  Good to see you too!   ::MonkeyCool::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #793 1/13/09
Post by: klaasend on January 17, 2009, 01:47:44 AM
I "think" it says that on the 1st of January, the American tourist Henry Matthew Charles was under the influence of alcohol and drugs when he jumped from the first floor of a hotel and broke his arm.  He was taken to the hospital for treatment, and died nine days later.

If I have this wrong, please correct me.  TIA

Sounds like he did a bit more than break his arm.

Goodnight all!


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #793 1/13/09
Post by: texasmom on January 17, 2009, 01:48:00 AM
Whatever happened with the guy, I don't like that it took a week after his death for the news to come out.  Not a good sign.  JMO

 ::MonkeyNoNo::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #793 1/13/09
Post by: texasmom on January 17, 2009, 01:49:18 AM
I "think" it says that on the 1st of January, the American tourist Henry Matthew Charles was under the influence of alcohol and drugs when he jumped from the first floor of a hotel and broke his arm.  He was taken to the hospital for treatment, and died nine days later.

If I have this wrong, please correct me.  TIA

Sounds like he did a bit more than break his arm.

Goodnight all!

Yes, I think there must be more to it too.  Goodnight Klaas!   ::MonkeyCool::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #793 1/13/09
Post by: Anna on January 17, 2009, 01:51:53 AM
Does it say he was in the hospital for nine days then died?  Note they are very quick to say alcohol and drugs involved.  Standard victim trashing but I don't think that was a detail that needed to be stated first thing in the article.  Maybe not at all.

And very quickly sent to Curacao for cremation?  No autopsy?

 ::MonkeyShocked::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #793 1/13/09
Post by: texasmom on January 17, 2009, 01:54:21 AM
Does it say he was in the hospital for nine days then died?  Note they are very quick to say alcohol and drugs involved.  Standard victim trashing but I don't think that was a detail that needed to be stated first thing in the article.  Maybe not at all.

And very quickly sent to Curacao for cremation?  No autopsy?

 ::MonkeyShocked::

I see Cageman here, he's much better with translations than I am.  I'm hoping he can clarify.  Your questions are ones I'm asking too, Anna.   ::MonkeyNoNo::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #793 1/13/09
Post by: Keepthefaith on January 17, 2009, 02:04:28 AM
The statements that we have of what went on are from Kyle.  I'm not so sure that he was entirely truthful so I am not putting too much credence in what he said happened on the boat and what they found. There has just been so much misinformation in the case and it continues.  Makes me sick!  Im going to call it a night. 

Yes.We are all titled to our opinion.What i'm tired of is the minimization of Kyle's words.Kyle's words,as well as pictures tell a tale of PIRATES on the high seas of Aruba.The concerted effort to discredit,minimize,as well as disregard all together what occured off the coast of Aruba is disturbing to me!Kyle,Silvetti,as well as Schaeffer should be ashamed of themselves.This is all just my opinion.I STAND WITH THE FROG.. ::MonkeyCool::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #793 1/13/09
Post by: hotping on January 17, 2009, 02:12:03 AM
Good Night All!

I Stand With the Girl....Natalee Ann Holloway!

Natalee is Still Missing!

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RYzSYV5b35Q


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #793 1/13/09
Post by: Keepthefaith on January 17, 2009, 02:13:18 AM
Good Night All!

I Stand With the Girl....Natalee Ann Holloway!

Natalee is Still Missing!

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RYzSYV5b35Q

Goodnight HotPing... ::MonkeyDance::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #793 1/13/09
Post by: texasmom on January 17, 2009, 02:19:01 AM
Good Night All!

I Stand With the Girl....Natalee Ann Holloway!

Natalee is Still Missing!

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RYzSYV5b35Q

Great video, thanks!

I'm Standing With the Girl too!  I'll never give up!

Goodnight Hotping.   ::MonkeyCool::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #793 1/13/09
Post by: Cageman on January 17, 2009, 02:19:18 AM
You're right, Texasmom. A couple of weeks more and you read an speak Papiamentu.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #793 1/13/09
Post by: Keepthefaith on January 17, 2009, 02:22:57 AM
You're right, Texasmom. A couple of weeks more and you read an speak Papiamentu.

 ::MonkeyLaugh::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #793 1/13/09
Post by: texasmom on January 17, 2009, 02:25:53 AM
You're right, Texasmom. A couple of weeks more and you read an speak Papiamentu.

Thank you Cageman, you are too kind.   ::MonkeyHaHa::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #793 1/13/09
Post by: hotping on January 17, 2009, 02:29:46 AM
Thanks KTF and TM....Sorry it took so long to reply I was over watching more videos.....And letting Natalee know thru My thoughts that

We will not give Up!

 ::MonkeyWink::

GOOD Night!


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #793 1/13/09
Post by: Keepthefaith on January 17, 2009, 02:30:34 AM
Thanks KTF and TM....Sorry it took so long to reply I was over watching more videos.....And letting Natalee know thru My thoughts that

We will not give Up!

 ::MonkeyWink::

GOOD Night!

Thankyou HP.No we won't. ::MonkeyNoNo::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #793 1/13/09
Post by: Keepthefaith on January 17, 2009, 02:41:17 AM
1/17/2009 Awe Mainta Front Page

http://awemainta.com/home/

(http://i21.photobucket.com/albums/b258/texasmom55/Misc%20News%204/01172009AweMaintaFP.jpg)

after of 9 day in hospital tourist owing to fayece.

day 1 of january, one tourist mericano, for 11.40 of night, supuestamente bao of influencia of alcohol y also of drugs, owing to cay for of first floor of one hotel in centro of oranjestad y owing to fractura his arm. police y ambulance owing to arrive n’e sitio, y owing to transporta the tourist henry matthew charles, naci at estados unidos day 19 of july 1972, for poli for tratamento, already cu his arm owing to stay fractura. sinembargo, by of the caida, the have to owing to achieve golpinan more earnest, because; cu day 10 of january, police owing to achieve informacion cu after cu past owing to stay interna all the dianan ey in cuido intensivo, past owing to fayece, debi n’e golpinan cu past owing to achieve. dr. croes owing to constata dead. the curpa will wordo send corsow for creamacion. paz at his restonan.

Yeah OK.Fractured arm=Death.Only in Aruba....One Happy Island.Another American DEAD.How many American's will it take to be murdered,and or die in Aruba before the USA takes notice????


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #793 1/13/09
Post by: Keepthefaith on January 17, 2009, 02:49:08 AM
Goodnight Lifesong, texasmom, Anna. ::MonkeyCool::


JUSTICE FOR NATALEE
                  JUSTICE FOR NATALEE
                                    JUSTICE FOR NATALEE
                                                       JUSTICE FOR NATALEE
                                                                          JUSTICE FOR NATALEE
                                                                                             


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #793 1/13/09
Post by: texasmom on January 17, 2009, 02:50:54 AM
Goodnight Lifesong, texasmom, Anna. ::MonkeyCool::


JUSTICE FOR NATALEE
                  JUSTICE FOR NATALEE
                                    JUSTICE FOR NATALEE
                                                       JUSTICE FOR NATALEE
                                                                          JUSTICE FOR NATALEE
                                                                                             

Goodnight KeeptheFaith!  Keep the Faith!   ::MonkeyWink:: ::MonkeyCool::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #793 1/13/09
Post by: iris44 on January 17, 2009, 03:41:26 AM
San, I am not defending Kyle.  I think he ran his mouth when he should not have.   Keepthefaith, they are from Lafayette, LA.


I ... for one ... am thankful the Kyle "ran his mouth".  The truth encompassing the deception of the Persistence undertaking was exposed.

Janet

Yes like I always say keep talking.

I agree that Kyle talked alot.  But what I still cannot understand is why so many people believe him.

Maybe I am jaded because I saw the multiple money-making internet schemes (complete with elaborate websites that were updated daily with HUGE mailing lists) my computer nerd son and his friends came up with during their high school years (almost 10 years ago, well before the days everyone had a blog or an email address, and when people were just starting to get online).  This is exactly what makes me think Kyle is full of crap.  He just reminds me exactly of them (especially when I see a picture of his nerdy self sitting at the computer on the Persistance).  You can bet he was one of those website making kids in high school/college that got in kind of "at the beginning" of the internet.  My son had an aviation website when he was 15 years old that had most of the FAA, NTSB and many major airline top honchos as regular visitors.  He was an airline pundit interviewed on BBC radio in the aftermath of 911, he was a guest speaker at airline conferences around the world (to scare the airlines into putting info on their websites immediately in the event of a crash, so this 15 year old kid wouldn't do it first), and he was quoted in the Wall Street Journal. (He turned down TV interview requests because they would find out he was a kid). He caused AirTran stock prices to plummet one day from an story on his site, and I constantly got calls from airline corporate attorneys threatening lawsuits.  One of his friends actually bought a Porsche while in high school with the proceeds from his own internet "ventures".  This is why I don't believe Kyle.  And this is reinforced by what casa said, that the family and noone else on the Persistence has said a word.  (And I will add Tim Miller, Greta and DeVries to that).  I know a lot of hard work has gone into the research with Kyle, but that doesn't mean it is true.  And if it isn't true, it seems like some of you are slandering the people that the family considers "Heroes" for the Persistance undertaking.  I don't see anything wrong with looking into it, but I still don't see any real evidence of a conspiracy.  Just because Kyle said it doesn't make it true.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #793 1/13/09
Post by: iris44 on January 17, 2009, 04:11:50 AM
HERE IS MY QUESTION.  WHY ARE PEOPLE SO BENT ON DISCREDITING KERMIT.  WHERE IS THE PROOF THAT PEOPLE ARE SAYING KERMIT IS LYING.

POST THE DAMN PROOF.

I DON'T WANT TO HERE WELL I TALKED TO THIS PERSON AND THEY SAID THIS.  TELL THE PERSON TO POST JUST LIKE KERMIT POSTS AND BACKS UP WHAT SHE POSTS.

Speaking only for myself, this is not an attempt to discredit Kermit.  In my posts, I am merely pointing out the fact that everything I have read says that Kermit and the Freebirds based their theory ONLY on Kyle's words and pictures, none of which have proven Natalee was in the cage.  I personally don't believe Kyle, so I cannot believe the Persistence conspiracy theory.  I do believe that Kyle told Kermit and others what Kermit has reported.  My question is: what makes Kyle so credible?  And why do some of you jump to the conclusion that a different opinion is an attempt to discredit other monkeys?  Can't someone have a differing opinion without trying to discredit others?  Or be a mole?

On a lighter note, I love the new "pirate" thing.  I'm hoping to see some new pics of the Persistence crew in their pirate gear.  Picturing Captain Sparrow.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #793 1/13/09
Post by: iris44 on January 17, 2009, 04:30:46 AM
I have a question for everyone to ponder.  We all know how Beth, Dave, Jug and others in the family were very vocal when Natalee went missing.  Very much into searching for her and ready to expose what they went through in Aruba and the mess that was going on.  Here is the question.  Do you think that if there was any chance that Natalee was in that trap that the family would be so quiet?  We have heard nothing from the family.  I personally think that in all this turmoil about the crab trap I would take my cues from the family.  They do know more than us and yes they do know more than Kermit.

Is this going to start another Kermit debate.  The family knows more than HotShot, CAPS, and others who are working behind the scenes to discredit Kermit.

I have no desire to start another Kermit debate.  I agree that the family knows more than Hotshot, CAPS and others.  I also believe that the family knows more than Kermit.  I was stating my opinion and I do realize that it may not be the same as those remaining on the Natalee thread but I thought we were all still entitled to our opinion. 

Everyone is entitiled to their own opinions.  The only problem is your opinion is that we shouldn't be discussing the possibility of wrong doing by Kyle or the Persiistence crew.  So your opinion is that our opinion is wrong and shouldn't be considered.

What should we discuss?  Should be discuss the weather in Aruba, Alabama, Arkansas or Mississippi?  Just curious what your suggestion might be? 

Apparently you read more into what I said than was there.  I did not say we should not be discussing Kyle, etc.  I did not say your opinion was wrong but apparently mine is.  Please don't look for things in my posts that are not there.  That is why I have abstained from posting because I knew my anything I said would be twisted.  I say lets hear something from the family before we hang people!

I understand, casa and agree with you completely.  Your posts were well stated and I don't think the snarky replies were fair.  It's Persistence conspiracy theory or nothing here lately.  I guess everyone is just frustrated, and letting emotions get in the way of common sense. 


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #793 1/13/09
Post by: iris44 on January 17, 2009, 04:44:42 AM
KYLE KINGMAN - IN HIS OWN WORDS MIND

Sorry, I couldn't resist.  Everytime I read that heading in Janet's posts I mentally picture it changed into that.  Everytime I read Kyle's "own words" I believe them less and less.

Disclaimer: This was not an attempt to discredit Kermit.
Disclaimer: This was not an attempt to upset Janet.  She seems like a great person.
Disclaimer: This poster is not associated with anyone.
Disclaimer: This is not an attempt to get KTF to tell Janet how logical she is.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #793 1/13/09
Post by: Buckeye on January 17, 2009, 06:08:24 AM
Broken Arm Man:  Matt Henry (juggler):

 Many of you know juggler Matt Henry, who has done a couple of really wonderful Fringe shows in years past and won a world juggling championship in 2001. Matt was hit by a car in Aruba a few days ago, and he suffered a broken arm (in two places), fractured ribs and pelvis and a punctured lung.

The good news is that he has medical insurance and that his doctors are sure Matt will recover and juggle again. The bad news is that he'll be in a hospital in Aruba for the next few weeks before he's flown to a rehabilitation center in the U.S.

David Lee suggests that cards and letters from his friends and admirers may speed up the healing process. Matt's address is:
Matt Henry, Room 344
Horacio Oduber Hospital
Oranjestad, Aruba



Some people claim a medjet is overreacting...sheesh...


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #793 1/13/09
Post by: Buckeye on January 17, 2009, 06:08:55 AM
Broken Arm Man:  Matt Henry (juggler):

 Many of you know juggler Matt Henry, who has done a couple of really wonderful Fringe shows in years past and won a world juggling championship in 2001. Matt was hit by a car in Aruba a few days ago, and he suffered a broken arm (in two places), fractured ribs and pelvis and a punctured lung.

The good news is that he has medical insurance and that his doctors are sure Matt will recover and juggle again. The bad news is that he'll be in a hospital in Aruba for the next few weeks before he's flown to a rehabilitation center in the U.S.

David Lee suggests that cards and letters from his friends and admirers may speed up the healing process. Matt's address is:
Matt Henry, Room 344
Horacio Oduber Hospital
Oranjestad, Aruba



Some people claim a medjet is overreacting...sheesh...

Forgot link
http://blogs.orlandosentinel.com/entertainment_stage_theat/2009/01/matt-henry-reco.html


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #793 1/13/09
Post by: sharon on January 17, 2009, 07:37:40 AM
KYLE KINGMAN - IN HIS OWN WORDS MIND

Sorry, I couldn't resist.  Everytime I read that heading in Janet's posts I mentally picture it changed into that.  Everytime I read Kyle's "own words" I believe them less and less.

Disclaimer: This was not an attempt to discredit Kermit.
Disclaimer: This was not an attempt to upset Janet.  She seems like a great person.
Disclaimer: This poster is not associated with anyone.
Disclaimer: This is not an attempt to get KTF to tell Janet how logical she is.

And you actually call other posters 'snarky'

 ::MonkeyNoNo::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #793 1/13/09
Post by: johan555 on January 17, 2009, 07:42:44 AM
Caribbean travel under pressure
15 Jan, 2009, 08:26 (GMT -04:00)
(http://www.amigoe.com/artman/uploads/15-cur-vakantiebeurs_001.gif)
   
The booth of Curacao on the Vacation Fair with from left to right CTB-director Evita Nita, minister Plenipotentiary Paul Comenencia, CBTE-director in the Netherlands Edward Suarez, and an employee of the tourism office.

UTRECHT/WILLEMSTAD – The Vacation Fair in Utrecht, the biggest event in this field,  is open till Sunday.  The islands of the Antilles, including Curacao are expressly present in the Caribbean Village to try to keep the stream of tourists at least equal to last peak year.  It is not easy for the Curacao Tourist Bureau though.  Due to the economic crisis, the travel market to far destinations is currently under pressure in the Netherlands.  It appears that the Dutch tourists are looking more for destinations close to home; like Southern Europe and the Canary Islands or in the Netherlands self.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #793 1/13/09
Post by: johan555 on January 17, 2009, 07:48:10 AM
(http://www.worth1000.com/entries/370000/370033rwAV_w.JPG)


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #793 1/13/09
Post by: wreck on January 17, 2009, 08:37:56 AM
1/17/2009 Awe Mainta Front Page

http://awemainta.com/home/

(http://i21.photobucket.com/albums/b258/texasmom55/Misc%20News%204/01172009AweMaintaFP.jpg)

after of 9 day in hospital tourist owing to fayece.

day 1 of january, one tourist mericano, for 11.40 of night, supuestamente bao of influencia of alcohol y also of drugs, owing to cay for of first floor of one hotel in centro of oranjestad y owing to fractura his arm. police y ambulance owing to arrive n’e sitio, y owing to transporta the tourist henry matthew charles, naci at estados unidos day 19 of july 1972, for poli for tratamento, already cu his arm owing to stay fractura. sinembargo, by of the caida, the have to owing to achieve golpinan more earnest, because; cu day 10 of january, police owing to achieve informacion cu after cu past owing to stay interna all the dianan ey in cuido intensivo, past owing to fayece, debi n’e golpinan cu past owing to achieve. dr. croes owing to constata dead. the curpa will wordo send corsow for creamacion. paz at his restonan.

Yeah OK.Fractured arm=Death.Only in Aruba....One Happy Island.Another American DEAD.How many American's will it take to be murdered,and or die in Aruba before the USA takes notice????
Well, he DID jump from the "First Floor"!!!  ::MonkeyRoll:: ::MonkeyRoll::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #793 1/13/09
Post by: wreck on January 17, 2009, 09:26:27 AM
Why do the very people who say we don't "respect" their opinion always disrespect OURS?   ::MonkeyConfused::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #793 1/13/09
Post by: texasmom on January 17, 2009, 09:30:07 AM
Thanks Buckeye! 

So Awe Mainta really has this one mixed up?  I do remember an incident of a tourist jumping from a lower story of a hotel, I remember the picture of him laying on the overhang of the ground floor and police by him.  IIRC he'd broken his arm.  But that has probably been a couple months ago. 



Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #793 1/13/09
Post by: texasmom on January 17, 2009, 09:32:23 AM
KYLE KINGMAN - IN HIS OWN WORDS MIND

Sorry, I couldn't resist.  Everytime I read that heading in Janet's posts I mentally picture it changed into that.  Everytime I read Kyle's "own words" I believe them less and less.

Disclaimer: This was not an attempt to discredit Kermit.
Disclaimer: This was not an attempt to upset Janet.  She seems like a great person.
Disclaimer: This poster is not associated with anyone.
Disclaimer: This is not an attempt to get KTF to tell Janet how logical she is.

And you actually call other posters 'snarky'

 ::MonkeyNoNo::

Thank you sharon, I agree.   ::MonkeyNoNo::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #793 1/13/09
Post by: Edward on January 17, 2009, 09:51:11 AM
You should find more clarity in the death of matt henry or Henry Matthew Charles

Do not let this one get away.. Possible You can open a can of worms


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #793 1/13/09
Post by: San on January 17, 2009, 09:54:24 AM
HERE IS MY QUESTION.  WHY ARE PEOPLE SO BENT ON DISCREDITING KERMIT.  WHERE IS THE PROOF THAT PEOPLE ARE SAYING KERMIT IS LYING.

POST THE DAMN PROOF.

I DON'T WANT TO HERE WELL I TALKED TO THIS PERSON AND THEY SAID THIS.  TELL THE PERSON TO POST JUST LIKE KERMIT POSTS AND BACKS UP WHAT SHE POSTS.

Speaking only for myself, this is not an attempt to discredit Kermit.  In my posts, I am merely pointing out the fact that everything I have read says that Kermit and the Freebirds based their theory ONLY on Kyle's words and pictures, none of which have proven Natalee was in the cage.  I personally don't believe Kyle, so I cannot believe the Persistence conspiracy theory.   I do believe that Kyle told Kermit and others what Kermit has reported.  My question is: what makes Kyle so credible?  And why do some of you jump to the conclusion that a different opinion is an attempt to discredit other monkeys?   Can't someone have a differing opinion without trying to discredit others?  Or be a mole?

On a lighter note, I love the new "pirate" thing.  I'm hoping to see some new pics of the Persistence crew in their pirate gear.  Picturing Captain Sparrow.

It's OK if you don't believe Kyle.  But why was Kyle so mad when information came out about the fabric and what was in that cage.  Why couldn't he prove that it was not the truth.  He posted the words for everyone to read.  People came to the conclusion that he was lying and they compared his words from SM to Freebirds.  Kermit gave Kyle the opportunity and Kyle ran away.

Some people that posted here on SM are trying to discredit Kermit.  What do they base their opinion on that they feel Kermit is lying.  Kemit has posted Kyle's own words.  Is it because it is the truth and he cannot prove that Kermit might be lying.  Pictures don't lie.  We have seen the bags in the cage because they were Kyles.  Some of these same people had access to the same words that Kermit has posted.  Why can't they prove that Kermit is lying.  But they all come on here trying to bash Kermit.  PROVE IT.

Some people believe in CapsLockWizard I don't.  I am not bashing the man I just have no faith in what he is saying.  I am not putting my faith in a man who decided to join SM right before the Persistence made their trip to Aruba.   He decided he was going to solve a riddle.  If he feels that he did then good for him.

Something happened here and we are trying to get to the truth.

Who is telling the truth.  Is Kyle telling the truth of Kermit telling the truth.  That's what is boils down to.

Kyle was a professional who had a job to do.  A professional who was suppose to be dedicating his time into searching for Natalee Holloway's remains.  This is a man who had a wife and child and even named his child after Natalee if I recall correctly.

Why was Kyle so upset about what Private Eye posted that he asked to speak to him in private.  Was he upset because he knew that he didn't give that information out and it got leaked.  Was he upset because he knew it was the truth and the truth wasn't suppose to come out.

The truth seems to stir a lot of emotions whether good or bad.

One more note.  I have never seen Kermit be disrespectful towards any poster.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #793 1/13/09
Post by: San on January 17, 2009, 10:10:44 AM
KYLE KINGMAN - IN HIS OWN WORDS MIND

Sorry, I couldn't resist.  Everytime I read that heading in Janet's posts I mentally picture it changed into that.  Everytime I read Kyle's "own words" I believe them less and less.

Disclaimer: This was not an attempt to discredit Kermit.
Disclaimer: This was not an attempt to upset Janet.  She seems like a great person.
Disclaimer: This poster is not associated with anyone.
Disclaimer: This is not an attempt to get KTF to tell Janet how logical she is.

And you actually call other posters 'snarky'

 ::MonkeyNoNo::

I agree.  This was an attempt at all of the above.  But as I sit here and post am I bashing iris.  Iris disagrees with the people that I agree with.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #793 1/13/09
Post by: San on January 17, 2009, 10:13:25 AM
Why do the very people who say we don't "respect" their opinion always disrespect OURS?   ::MonkeyConfused::

We are not allowed to have an opinion if it conflicts with their opinion  ::MonkeyConfused::

I have been told that I am very opinionated and I will add I am thick headed.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #793 1/13/09
Post by: sharon on January 17, 2009, 10:16:33 AM
Disagreeing and Disrespecting are 2 different words.

Disagreeing is fine.

Disrespecting? I put my trust in klaas and you guys   ::MonkeyWink::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #793 1/13/09
Post by: sharon on January 17, 2009, 10:21:59 AM
OK. Time to be productuve  ::MonkeyWaa::

It is 10am and only 54 degrees this morning in Miami.

I haven't removed my fleece lined old navy sweats and fleece lined roxy boots in days.....(shhh, don't tell Dolce)

And always remember.....

AVOID ARUBA AS IF YOUR LIFE DEPENDS ON IT...IT DOES!!!!

Justice for Natalee Holloway
Peace for her family and loved ones


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #793 1/13/09
Post by: 2NJSons_Mom on January 17, 2009, 10:49:31 AM
OK. Time to be productuve  ::MonkeyWaa::

It is 10am and only 54 degrees this morning in Miami.

I haven't removed my fleece lined old navy sweats and fleece lined roxy boots in days.....(shhh, don't tell Dolce)

And always remember.....

AVOID ARUBA AS IF YOUR LIFE DEPENDS ON IT...IT DOES!!!!

Justice for Natalee Holloway
Peace for her family and loved ones

It was 2 degrees when I got up around 6:30am...it now has warmed to 6 degrees.  brrrrr

You are always 'stylin' in my book, and I admire the way you express your thoughts......

San, your posts have been a mainstay since the beginning.  If being opinionated and thick headed is how you are perceived, that's complimentary, imo.  You haven't waivered.  Have to 'respect' that.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #793 1/13/09
Post by: San on January 17, 2009, 10:55:27 AM
OK. Time to be productuve  ::MonkeyWaa::

It is 10am and only 54 degrees this morning in Miami.

I haven't removed my fleece lined old navy sweats and fleece lined roxy boots in days.....(shhh, don't tell Dolce)

And always remember.....

AVOID ARUBA AS IF YOUR LIFE DEPENDS ON IT...IT DOES!!!!

Justice for Natalee Holloway
Peace for her family and loved ones

It was 2 degrees when I got up around 6:30am...it now has warmed to 6 degrees.  brrrrr

You are always 'stylin' in my book, and I admire the way you express your thoughts......

San, your posts have been a mainstay since the beginning.  If being opinionated and thick headed is how you are perceived, that's complimentary, imo.  You haven't waivered.  Have to 'respect' that.


Thanks 2NJSons.  ::MonkeyWink::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #793 1/13/09
Post by: Tamikosmom on January 17, 2009, 11:21:34 AM
I "think" it says that on the 1st of January, the American tourist Henry Matthew Charles was under the influence of alcohol and drugs when he jumped from the first floor of a hotel and broke his arm.  He was taken to the hospital for treatment, and died nine days later.

If I have this wrong, please correct me.  TIA

Thanks texasmom.

I appreciate you and other monkeys who are so faithful in bringing articles from Dutch and Artuban publications to the the forum.

Janet


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #793 1/13/09
Post by: Tamikosmom on January 17, 2009, 11:42:54 AM
KYLE KINGMAN - IN HIS OWN WORDS MIND

Sorry, I couldn't resist.  Everytime I read that heading in Janet's posts I mentally picture it changed into that.  Everytime I read Kyle's "own words" I believe them less and less.

Disclaimer: This was not an attempt to discredit Kermit.
Disclaimer: This was not an attempt to upset Janet.  She seems like a great person.
Disclaimer: This poster is not associated with anyone.
Disclaimer: This is not an attempt to get KTF to tell Janet how logical she is.


Good Morning Iris.

Hey ... you have never answered my question.  Do you have any personal connection to John Silvetti ... direct or indirect?

Thanks Iris.

Casa has conceded that she does have an indirect connection and ... that indirect connection has convinced her that John Silvetti's motives in regard to the Persistence undertaking are above reproach..

Janet

+++++++


casa
Re: Natalee Case Discussion #777 11/21/08 thru
« Reply #238 on: November 22, 2008, 02:30:48 AM »


Ok Im going to say this one time and I will be done.  There is someone very close to my family who knows John Silvetti and knew him way before Natalee went missing.  This man is a class act.  He went into this to find Natalee and help her family.  He is in NO way a part of a coverup! It is an insult to this man to even suggest that he is a part of a cover up.  You who beliive this should be ashamed.   You all can choose to believe what you want and you can choose to blindly follow anyone you want but it does not change the FACTS.  I am just sorry that people choose to follow someone who does not even know this man and who in my opinion says things to draw attention to himself.  Sadly theer have been way too many people who have claimed to know stuff who don't have a clue!

http://scaredmonkeys.net/index.php?topic=4159.msg553060#msg553060


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #793 1/13/09
Post by: Tamikosmom on January 17, 2009, 11:47:13 AM

I understand, casa and agree with you completely.  Your posts were well stated and I don't think the snarky replies were fair.  It's Persistence conspiracy theory or nothing here lately.  I guess everyone is just frustrated, and letting emotions get in the way of common sense.
 

Iris ... I often speculate to fill in the gaps in my theories where I cannot locate any credible backup/source.  However ... in regard to the deception behind the Persistence undertaking ... I do not have to theory.  Kyle Kingman's own words tells the who story.

IMO

Janet


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #793 1/13/09
Post by: Keepthefaith on January 17, 2009, 12:10:34 PM
Good Morning Monkey's.A wonderful foggy day in the Northwest. ::MonkeyDance:: Again.The dumbing down,minimization of Kyle's own words! ::MonkeyEek:: How'd i know that was coming! ::MonkeyCool::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #793 1/13/09
Post by: Blue Moon on January 17, 2009, 12:10:58 PM
My main problem with Kyle is that I think he enjoyed the attention he got from posting on the forums.  I think he was willing to post whatever made him seem important.  That is why I have a problem with what he posted.  I'm not so sure that any of it is factual.

The Natalee's Freebirds is/was a private forum ... no exposure.  If you read the former Natalee's Freebirds' administrator (Jen) email to Klaas ... she explains that Kyle joined the Natalee's Freebirds with the intention of receiving assistance in compiling a document of the happenings on board the Persistence ... a document that could be submitted to Beth Holloway.  Somewhere along the way Kyle had a change of heart ...

Casa ... I posted the Jen's email which Klaas posted above ... please read.

Janet

Beth HAS NEVER come on this board and told anyone what we can or cannot discuss concerning Natalee and the happenings in Aruba.  She has said she will be Natalee's voice for however long she can even if it is 40 years and she hopes she has that long.  Until Beth says it is over then to me it is NOT over.  JMO.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #793 1/13/09
Post by: Blue Moon on January 17, 2009, 12:23:23 PM
(http://www.worth1000.com/entries/370000/370033rwAV_w.JPG)

Johan, you are very creative with that monster. Now this picture is VERY scary to me.
 ::MonkeyShocked::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #793 1/13/09
Post by: Blue Moon on January 17, 2009, 12:37:42 PM
Just my thoughts on Kyle and the cage.  Anyone who comes on here and minimizes our words by saying they do not "buy" into our conspiracy theory concerning the Persistence I have only one thing to say about that:  They are not very informed to NOT see what we are saying concerning Kyle and the Persistence endeavor.   IF (and I do not at this point know if Natalee's remains were in that cage) that was Natalee's remains in that cage and the crew of the Persistence allowed Aruba to recover her remains then to me it is not a conspiracy but a CRIMINAL act that should not have happened.  I don't have to have any member of Natalee's family say a word for me to not know exactly how they are feeling about all that happened aboard that boat.  It is a lost opportunity that I am very sure the crew was informed of from the get-go.  One thing I do know from Kyle's own pictures is there is a strong probability that someone was in that cage and NOW no one will ever know who it was be it Natalee and some other human being who is missing. 

I stand with the frog and Natalee and her family.

Blue Moon


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #793 1/13/09
Post by: Keepthefaith on January 17, 2009, 12:41:36 PM
HERE IS MY QUESTION.  WHY ARE PEOPLE SO BENT ON DISCREDITING KERMIT.  WHERE IS THE PROOF THAT PEOPLE ARE SAYING KERMIT IS LYING.

POST THE DAMN PROOF.

I DON'T WANT TO HERE WELL I TALKED TO THIS PERSON AND THEY SAID THIS.  TELL THE PERSON TO POST JUST LIKE KERMIT POSTS AND BACKS UP WHAT SHE POSTS.

Speaking only for myself, this is not an attempt to discredit Kermit.  In my posts, I am merely pointing out the fact that everything I have read says that Kermit and the Freebirds based their theory ONLY on Kyle's words and pictures, none of which have proven Natalee was in the cage.  I personally don't believe Kyle, so I cannot believe the Persistence conspiracy theory.  I do believe that Kyle told Kermit and others what Kermit has reported.  My question is: what makes Kyle so credible?  And why do some of you jump to the conclusion that a different opinion is an attempt to discredit other monkeys?  Can't someone have a differing opinion without trying to discredit others?   Or be a mole?

On a lighter note, I love the new "pirate" thing.  I'm hoping to see some new pics of the Persistence crew in their pirate gear.  Picturing Captain Sparrow.

Iris44
"I think the postings about Kyle have been too harsh.  He clearly expressed his concerns all along and provided tons of info that would never have been available otherwise.  I also agree that some of what he said may have been taken out of context.  It's easy to question everything he did in retrospect, but I think he did his best functioning in a complex situation and had good intentions.  Sometimes things are not black and white, and of course he has to protect himself and his livelihood and reputation.  I think it was a mistake to alienate him, and I don't think he owes it to SM to defend himself.  Sometimes you are placed in a situation where it's a no-win no matter what you do. And using his religious beliefs to try to get him to come back and explain seems cruel.


If that isn't an attempt to discredit i don't know what it is! ::MonkeyCool::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #793 1/13/09
Post by: Tamikosmom on January 17, 2009, 12:42:08 PM
Kyle kingman is not a kid ... he is an adult.  Kyle is a university graduate.  Kyle has a professional career in his field of expertise.  Kyle Kingman owns his own company.  Kyle Kingman is a husband.  Kyle Kingman is a father.  Kyle Kingman held a professional position on board the Persistence ... a professional postion that complimented his field of expertise..

I am a believer in Kyle's own words ... words which exposed that the Persistence endeavor had nothing to do with justice for Natalee Holloway and ... had everything to do with John Silvetti assisting the ALE in the finale to the great Aruban coverup in exchange for benefits that furthered his own self interests on the island.

Now that Kyle Kingman' own words are not going to go away and ... those who have up until now upheld both Kyle and John Silvetti realize there is a conflict and ... a choice needs to be made in regards to alliance.

1.  If Kyle Kingman's words are the truth then ... John Silvetti is a scam artist in regards to his claims regarding the objective of Persistence undertaking or ...

2.  If Kyle Kingman's words are outright lies then ... there is no proof that John Silvetti's intentions were nothing but honorable.

I do believe that Kyle Kingman's own words are no longer going to be justified by claims that ... he is young ... he is seeking attention.  Why?  It just does not compute.

I contend that Kyle is going to be thrown under the bus with the implication that he is a liar and ... John Silvetti will somehow emerge the hero of the Persistence endeavor.

1.  Maybe ... in the name of damage control ... a negotiated agreement between Kyle Kingman and John Silvetti in regards to damage control will have Kyle conceding that his own words posted to the Natalee's Freebirds and Scared Monkey sites were fabricated or ...

2.  Maybe Kyle Kingman will step/has stepped up to the plate and revealed the dynamics regarding the deception of the Persistence undertaking to the FBI.

The latter implies there will be a backlash in regards to personal consequences for Kyle  concerning future professional opportunities as well as a possible lawsuit ... both involving John Silvetti.  Maybe a statement to the FBI implies that the waters will be muddied in regard to network negotiations.

In other words ... doing right is not always easy but it is right.  The fallout is an outcome that Kyle will have to deal with but ... a clear conscience implies that it will all be worth it in the long run.

Janet

+++++

Proverbs 22:1
A good name is rather to be chosen than great riches


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #793 1/13/09
Post by: Tamikosmom on January 17, 2009, 12:49:03 PM
Good Morning Monkey's.A wonderful foggy day in the Northwest. ::MonkeyDance:: Again.The dumbing down,minimization of Kyle's own words! ::MonkeyEek:: How'd i know that was coming! ::MonkeyCool::

Foggy here too neighbour.  The sun would give me such a life.  However ... I am not complaining.  I can deal with the fog ... the lack of sunshine.  The snow is disappearing.  The temperature is above freezing.  The floods are receding.

 ::cartwheel::

Janet



Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #793 1/13/09
Post by: Keepthefaith on January 17, 2009, 12:55:46 PM
Good Morning Monkey's.A wonderful foggy day in the Northwest. ::MonkeyDance:: Again.The dumbing down,minimization of Kyle's own words! ::MonkeyEek:: How'd i know that was coming! ::MonkeyCool::

Foggy here too neighbour.  The sun would give me such a life.  However ... I am not complaining.  I can deal with the fog ... the lack of sunshine.  The snow is disappearing.  The temperature is above freezing.  The floods are receding.

 ::cartwheel::

Janet



Although i do enjoy the sun most i'm quite content with the Fog.Say goodbye to the snow and floods! ::MonkeyDance::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #793 1/13/09
Post by: Kermit on January 17, 2009, 01:00:19 PM
My main problem with Kyle is that I think he enjoyed the attention he got from posting on the forums.  I think he was willing to post whatever made him seem important.  That is why I have a problem with what he posted.  I'm not so sure that any of it is factual.

casa

1. If what Kyle said is not factual, then why don't you call up the media HE contacted and find out why he was trying to sell the images of the ROV/trap/cage!

2. I do not speak for the family nor have I ever said I do.  I gave proof that Beth gave me permission to expose the document/cover-up by Aruban's.

3. I know more then you think I know.






Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #793 1/13/09
Post by: hotping on January 17, 2009, 01:09:07 PM
Good Morning/Afternoon Kermit! Have Ya got any uplifting News or Tidbits that You can share with Us? PLease....give Us something to lift Our spirits in regards to the case.....that is if You can...... ::MonkeyWink::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #793 1/13/09
Post by: Keepthefaith on January 17, 2009, 01:15:28 PM
My main problem with Kyle is that I think he enjoyed the attention he got from posting on the forums.  I think he was willing to post whatever made him seem important.  That is why I have a problem with what he posted.  I'm not so sure that any of it is factual.

casa

1. If what Kyle said is not factual, then why don't you call up the media HE contacted and find out why he was trying to sell the images of the ROV/trap/cage!

2. I do not speak for the family nor have I ever said I do.  I gave proof that Beth gave me permission to expose the document/cover-up by Aruban's.

3. I know more then you think I know.






This is about bringing Natalee Holloway home,if at all possible,as well as closure for Dave and Beth.When someone stands in the way of that goal.I find them less then honorable.This Wonderful family DESERVES better then what they got out on the seas of Aruba.Again.This is just my opinion.God Bless Dave and Beth for having an imeasurable strength and faith that Good does still exist in some!

KEEPTHEFAITH


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #793 1/13/09
Post by: Tamikosmom on January 17, 2009, 01:16:36 PM
My main problem with Kyle is that I think he enjoyed the attention he got from posting on the forums.  I think he was willing to post whatever made him seem important.  That is why I have a problem with what he posted.  I'm not so sure that any of it is factual.

casa

1. If what Kyle said is not factual, then why don't you call up the media HE contacted and find out why he was trying to sell the images of the ROV/trap/cage!

2. I do not speak for the family nor have I ever said I do.  I gave proof that Beth gave me permission to expose the document/cover-up by Aruban's.

3. I know more then you think I know.



Ribbit.

Kermit ... logic dictates that Tim T., Louis S. and Kyle K. were not attempting to make deals with major networks by offering ROV images that reveal nothing Natalee Holloway related.

Janet

++++++


KYLE KINGMAN - IN HIS OWN WORDS

THE NETWORKS

 
Kyle:  I've talked with Peter Shouten numerous times back in February. He hasn't seen anything but knows about the blue fabrics. DeVries and Endemol was interested in purchasing the ROV footage and I was working between them, ABC, and CBS to strike a deal.
 
Kyle:  It was confirmed by the FBI that they received a fabric sample send by Richardson and that it wasn't a match to Natalee's blouse. I think the video can prove or disprove whatever the FBI was sent was the same object or not. I strongly believe it's blue denim. Everyone I show thinks the same thing without being prompted (including senior ABC execs).

Kyle:  Louis is currently working with someone who I do not know to put together some documentary on the case, the way it was handled, and what happened during the search. I learned this from Tim T. yesterday. Louis was sold on the idea that it will make him a lot of money.
 
Kyle:  Schafer is sue crazy.
 
Kyle:  Right before the Dateline special aired Tim and Louis asked if I could go to ABC to try to sell the footage in an attempt to recoup some of the money invested in the search efforts. ABC was very interested, but decided to wait until the Dateline special aired. After the show they came back to me and declined to purchase it because they felt too much of the story was already told by Dateline. That ended any communication with ABC. About 6 executive producers saw the footage, but none were allowed copies or any pictures. Everything remained in my possesion.
 
Kyle:  We believe the trap footage may be the missing piece which will raise a BIG question in the minds of the public everywhere. We're in the process of figuring out how to produce and spin the story most accurately and most effectively. Also, and completely independant and unrelated, John will be in Aruba tomorrow and will report soon. This is a different issue. He knows nothing of what we're about to do with the footage.
 
Kyle:  I prefer moving forward with the evidence I have access and knowledge about and using that as a can opener. Once the can is open, the worms are revealed.
 
Kyle:  I should clarify that the footage proceeds (if sold) wouldn't even have covered the cost of the project, but it would have helped.
 
Kyle:  No one else has access or copies of the photos or footage. All fingers point back to me when this leaks.
 
Kyle:  Louis does have legal rights to the footage regardless of Underwater Expeditions status. Louis personally signed the checks for the search.
 
Kyle:  I prefer moving forward with the evidence I have access and knowledge about and using that as a can opener. Once the can is open, the worms are revealed.

Kyle:  I will soon propose a meeting with Beth and other family members, myself, Tim Trahan, Peter DeVries, and whomever else necessary to go over the ROV video, contents, and case status. I would like a couple people very familiar with the case documents also present to help connect dots during the meeting. I would prefer meeting towards the end of April or mid-May to allow adequate time for things to shake themselves out if is going to. If necessary, I have an ABC (20/20) and CBS (early show) film crew ready and willing to take part in such a meeting should it require press coverage. I've already had a meeting with ABC about this and they are "definitely interested" at the executive level. We met in mid-Feb about this already. The question becomes timing, who needs to be there, and whether or not it's covered by the press. I prefer not, but it may be useful. DeVries doesn't need to be there in my opinion but he's good for ratings and helps ABC be cooperative if needed.
 
Kyle:   She [BETH] needs to know exactly what we found in the proper timing. The way to do that would be through Tim Trahan and I. I can arrange any meeting with him. He represents the owner and the rights to the data, in this case, Louis S. I have everything but I don't want to go around him for chain of custody reasons, professional courtesy, and friendship.
 
Kyle:   On the other hand, those differences has also caused a rift between Tim Trahan/Louis and myself with John (although John and I remain close friends and colleagues). The result is Tim, Louis and I are moving forward and John is left out of the loop.
 


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #793 1/13/09
Post by: Keepthefaith on January 17, 2009, 01:17:51 PM
My main problem with Kyle is that I think he enjoyed the attention he got from posting on the forums.  I think he was willing to post whatever made him seem important.  That is why I have a problem with what he posted.  I'm not so sure that any of it is factual.

casa

1. If what Kyle said is not factual, then why don't you call up the media HE contacted and find out why he was trying to sell the images of the ROV/trap/cage!

2. I do not speak for the family nor have I ever said I do.  I gave proof that Beth gave me permission to expose the document/cover-up by Aruban's.

3. I know more then you think I know.



Ribbit.

Kermit ... logic dictates that Tim T., Louis S. and Kyle K. were not attempting to make deals with major networks by offering ROV images that reveal nothing Natalee Holloway related.

Janet

++++++


KYLE KINGMAN - IN HIS OWN WORDS

THE NETWORKS

 
Kyle:  I've talked with Peter Shouten numerous times back in February. He hasn't seen anything but knows about the blue fabrics. DeVries and Endemol was interested in purchasing the ROV footage and I was working between them, ABC, and CBS to strike a deal.
 
Kyle:  It was confirmed by the FBI that they received a fabric sample send by Richardson and that it wasn't a match to Natalee's blouse. I think the video can prove or disprove whatever the FBI was sent was the same object or not. I strongly believe it's blue denim. Everyone I show thinks the same thing without being prompted (including senior ABC execs).

Kyle:  Louis is currently working with someone who I do not know to put together some documentary on the case, the way it was handled, and what happened during the search. I learned this from Tim T. yesterday. Louis was sold on the idea that it will make him a lot of money.
 
Kyle:  Schafer is sue crazy.
 
Kyle:  Right before the Dateline special aired Tim and Louis asked if I could go to ABC to try to sell the footage in an attempt to recoup some of the money invested in the search efforts. ABC was very interested, but decided to wait until the Dateline special aired. After the show they came back to me and declined to purchase it because they felt too much of the story was already told by Dateline. That ended any communication with ABC. About 6 executive producers saw the footage, but none were allowed copies or any pictures. Everything remained in my possesion.
 
Kyle:  We believe the trap footage may be the missing piece which will raise a BIG question in the minds of the public everywhere. We're in the process of figuring out how to produce and spin the story most accurately and most effectively. Also, and completely independant and unrelated, John will be in Aruba tomorrow and will report soon. This is a different issue. He knows nothing of what we're about to do with the footage.
 
Kyle:  I prefer moving forward with the evidence I have access and knowledge about and using that as a can opener. Once the can is open, the worms are revealed.
 
Kyle:  I should clarify that the footage proceeds (if sold) wouldn't even have covered the cost of the project, but it would have helped.
 
Kyle:  No one else has access or copies of the photos or footage. All fingers point back to me when this leaks.
 
Kyle:  Louis does have legal rights to the footage regardless of Underwater Expeditions status. Louis personally signed the checks for the search.
 
Kyle:  I prefer moving forward with the evidence I have access and knowledge about and using that as a can opener. Once the can is open, the worms are revealed.

Kyle:  I will soon propose a meeting with Beth and other family members, myself, Tim Trahan, Peter DeVries, and whomever else necessary to go over the ROV video, contents, and case status. I would like a couple people very familiar with the case documents also present to help connect dots during the meeting. I would prefer meeting towards the end of April or mid-May to allow adequate time for things to shake themselves out if is going to. If necessary, I have an ABC (20/20) and CBS (early show) film crew ready and willing to take part in such a meeting should it require press coverage. I've already had a meeting with ABC about this and they are "definitely interested" at the executive level. We met in mid-Feb about this already. The question becomes timing, who needs to be there, and whether or not it's covered by the press. I prefer not, but it may be useful. DeVries doesn't need to be there in my opinion but he's good for ratings and helps ABC be cooperative if needed.
 
Kyle:   She [BETH] needs to know exactly what we found in the proper timing. The way to do that would be through Tim Trahan and I. I can arrange any meeting with him. He represents the owner and the rights to the data, in this case, Louis S. I have everything but I don't want to go around him for chain of custody reasons, professional courtesy, and friendship.
 
Kyle:   On the other hand, those differences has also caused a rift between Tim Trahan/Louis and myself with John (although John and I remain close friends and colleagues). The result is Tim, Louis and I are moving forward and John is left out of the loop.
 


OK Janet.You did it.Logic dictates! ::MonkeyDance::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #793 1/13/09
Post by: Kermit on January 17, 2009, 01:18:19 PM
Good Morning/Afternoon Kermit! Have Ya got any uplifting News or Tidbits that You can share with Us? PLease....give Us something to lift Our spirits in regards to the case.....that is if You can...... ::MonkeyWink::

Hello Hotping,

When the time is right I will.





Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #793 1/13/09
Post by: Tamikosmom on January 17, 2009, 01:19:12 PM
My main problem with Kyle is that I think he enjoyed the attention he got from posting on the forums.  I think he was willing to post whatever made him seem important.  That is why I have a problem with what he posted.  I'm not so sure that any of it is factual.

casa

1. If what Kyle said is not factual, then why don't you call up the media HE contacted and find out why he was trying to sell the images of the ROV/trap/cage!

2. I do not speak for the family nor have I ever said I do.  I gave proof that Beth gave me permission to expose the document/cover-up by Aruban's.

3. I know more then you think I know.






This is about bringing Natalee Holloway home,if at all possible,as well as closure for Dave and Beth.When someone stands in the way of that goal.I find them less then honorable.This Wonderful family DESERVES better then what they got out on the seas of Aruba.Again.This is just my opinion.God Bless Dave and Beth for having an imeasurable strength and faith that Good does still exist in some!

KEEPTHEFAITH

... and this when this pitbull (Mum's definition) come out growling ... snarling and ... showing her teeth.

Hi MumInOhio.

 ::MonkeyHaHa::

Janet


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #793 1/13/09
Post by: hotping on January 17, 2009, 01:20:31 PM
Good Morning/Afternoon Kermit! Have Ya got any uplifting News or Tidbits that You can share with Us? PLease....give Us something to lift Our spirits in regards to the case.....that is if You can...... ::MonkeyWink::

Hello Hotping,

When the time is right I will.




Thank You......Just those seven little words....are encouraging!  ::MonkeyCool:: 


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #793 1/13/09
Post by: Tamikosmom on January 17, 2009, 01:20:33 PM
Good Morning/Afternoon Kermit! Have Ya got any uplifting News or Tidbits that You can share with Us? PLease....give Us something to lift Our spirits in regards to the case.....that is if You can...... ::MonkeyWink::

Hello Hotping,

When the time is right I will.


... but ... but ... Tamikosmom wants to know NOW!!!

 ::MonkeyWaa::

Janet


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #793 1/13/09
Post by: Keepthefaith on January 17, 2009, 01:23:22 PM
Good Morning/Afternoon Kermit! Have Ya got any uplifting News or Tidbits that You can share with Us? PLease....give Us something to lift Our spirits in regards to the case.....that is if You can...... ::MonkeyWink::

Hello Hotping,

When the time is right I will.





One would assume,from all the TV shows you did,your timing would be impeccable!I KEEPTHEFAITH..


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #793 1/13/09
Post by: hotping on January 17, 2009, 01:24:54 PM
Good Morning/Afternoon Kermit! Have Ya got any uplifting News or Tidbits that You can share with Us? PLease....give Us something to lift Our spirits in regards to the case.....that is if You can...... ::MonkeyWink::

Hello Hotping,

When the time is right I will.


... but ... but ... Tamikosmom wants to know NOW!!!

 ::MonkeyWaa::

Janet
Me Too Janet.....but I keep remembering that  Patience is a Virtue!  ::MonkeyWink::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #793 1/13/09
Post by: Tamikosmom on January 17, 2009, 01:26:24 PM
Good Morning/Afternoon Kermit! Have Ya got any uplifting News or Tidbits that You can share with Us? PLease....give Us something to lift Our spirits in regards to the case.....that is if You can...... ::MonkeyWink::

Hello Hotping,

When the time is right I will.


... but ... but ... Tamikosmom wants to know NOW!!!

 ::MonkeyWaa::

Janet
Me Too Janet.....but I keep remembering that  Patience is a Virtue!  ::MonkeyWink::

A virtue that God has yet to bless me with.

 ::MonkeyWaa::

Janet


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #793 1/13/09
Post by: hotping on January 17, 2009, 01:26:34 PM
My main problem with Kyle is that I think he enjoyed the attention he got from posting on the forums.  I think he was willing to post whatever made him seem important.  That is why I have a problem with what he posted.  I'm not so sure that any of it is factual.

casa

1. If what Kyle said is not factual, then why don't you call up the media HE contacted and find out why he was trying to sell the images of the ROV/trap/cage!

2. I do not speak for the family nor have I ever said I do.  I gave proof that Beth gave me permission to expose the document/cover-up by Aruban's.

3. I know more then you think I know.






This is about bringing Natalee Holloway home,if at all possible,as well as closure for Dave and Beth.When someone stands in the way of that goal.I find them less then honorable.This Wonderful family DESERVES better then what they got out on the seas of Aruba.Again.This is just my opinion.God Bless Dave and Beth for having an imeasurable strength and faith that Good does still exist in some!

KEEPTHEFAITH

... and this when this pitbull (Mum's definition) come out growling ... snarling and ... showing her teeth.

Hi MumInOhio.

 ::MonkeyHaHa::

Janet
  ::MonkeyDance::  ::MonkeyHaHa::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #793 1/13/09
Post by: Keepthefaith on January 17, 2009, 01:28:09 PM
Good Morning/Afternoon Kermit! Have Ya got any uplifting News or Tidbits that You can share with Us? PLease....give Us something to lift Our spirits in regards to the case.....that is if You can...... ::MonkeyWink::

Hello Hotping,

When the time is right I will.


... but ... but ... Tamikosmom wants to know NOW!!!

 ::MonkeyWaa::

Janet
Me Too Janet.....but I keep remembering that  Patience is a Virtue!  ::MonkeyWink::

A virtue that God has yet to bless me with.

 ::MonkeyWaa::

Janet

God did bless you with a wonderful husband that understood that! ::MonkeyLaugh::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #793 1/13/09
Post by: hotping on January 17, 2009, 01:30:06 PM
Good Morning/Afternoon Kermit! Have Ya got any uplifting News or Tidbits that You can share with Us? PLease....give Us something to lift Our spirits in regards to the case.....that is if You can...... ::MonkeyWink::

Hello Hotping,

When the time is right I will.


... but ... but ... Tamikosmom wants to know NOW!!!

 ::MonkeyWaa::

Janet
Me Too Janet.....but I keep remembering that  Patience is a Virtue!  ::MonkeyWink::

A virtue that God has yet to bless me with.

 ::MonkeyWaa::

Janet
I believe that You have lots of patience....after all You have been here fighting for Justice for Natalee for a long time....maybe You just don't recognize it....  ::MonkeyWink::   ::MonkeyCool::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #793 1/13/09
Post by: Tamikosmom on January 17, 2009, 01:31:05 PM
Good Morning/Afternoon Kermit! Have Ya got any uplifting News or Tidbits that You can share with Us? PLease....give Us something to lift Our spirits in regards to the case.....that is if You can...... ::MonkeyWink::

Hello Hotping,

When the time is right I will.


... but ... but ... Tamikosmom wants to know NOW!!!

 ::MonkeyWaa::

Janet
Me Too Janet.....but I keep remembering that  Patience is a Virtue!  ::MonkeyWink::

A virtue that God has yet to bless me with.

 ::MonkeyWaa::

Janet

God did bless you with a wonderful husband that understood that! ::MonkeyLaugh::

This guy does not understand my lack of sooo many virtues but ... incredibly he loves me anyways.  Keepthefaith ... I am blessed.

Janet


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #793 1/13/09
Post by: Kermit on January 17, 2009, 01:32:49 PM
naysayers, doubters and disbelievers, or just questions one may have,

ask yourself

Why would Kyle, with the agreement of Louis Schafer and Tim Tehran, fly home to the U.S. and try to sell the ROV/videos of the trap to the U.S. media and Peter deVries? If it's just rocks or someone else's body then it is supervelous isn't it for Kyle to have gone to all that trouble?

Why would Kyle and John Silvetti NOT contact the family directly and give them what they saw and tell them everything that went on?

If John Silvetti is above reproach, then why did he go back to Aruba to set up an office to do business with South America? Why did John Silvetti merge his GeoLab company with a DUTCH company?

If John Silvetti is above reproach, then why did he remove all things Holloway from the boat upon it's return
and not contact the family immediately to go over the important things that were discovered? Oh yes, because
he mapped the ocean floor for oil. Jug Twitty knew John Silvetti was an OIL GUY!

If John Silvetti is above reproach, then why did he turn away and allow ONLY ARUBAN DIVERS TO RETRIEVE EVIDENCE FROM THE CAGE/TRAP? It was only because the ROV was still filming that Kyle was able to take screen shots of that dive! Not because of John Silvetti's protection of evidence.

Beth gave me permission to expose the Aruban cover-up. AND other family members know that Beth did indeed give me that permission. The other freebirds know this to be true, they have all seen the emails.







Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #793 1/13/09
Post by: Kermit on January 17, 2009, 01:35:27 PM
My main problem with Kyle is that I think he enjoyed the attention he got from posting on the forums.  I think he was willing to post whatever made him seem important.  That is why I have a problem with what he posted.  I'm not so sure that any of it is factual.

casa

1. If what Kyle said is not factual, then why don't you call up the media HE contacted and find out why he was trying to sell the images of the ROV/trap/cage!

2. I do not speak for the family nor have I ever said I do.  I gave proof that Beth gave me permission to expose the document/cover-up by Aruban's.

3. I know more then you think I know.



Ribbit.

Kermit ... logic dictates that Tim T., Louis S. and Kyle K. were not attempting to make deals with major networks by offering ROV images that reveal nothing Natalee Holloway related.

Janet

++++++


KYLE KINGMAN - IN HIS OWN WORDS

THE NETWORKS

 
Kyle:  I've talked with Peter Shouten numerous times back in February. He hasn't seen anything but knows about the blue fabrics. DeVries and Endemol was interested in purchasing the ROV footage and I was working between them, ABC, and CBS to strike a deal.
 
Kyle:  It was confirmed by the FBI that they received a fabric sample send by Richardson and that it wasn't a match to Natalee's blouse. I think the video can prove or disprove whatever the FBI was sent was the same object or not. I strongly believe it's blue denim. Everyone I show thinks the same thing without being prompted (including senior ABC execs).

Kyle:  Louis is currently working with someone who I do not know to put together some documentary on the case, the way it was handled, and what happened during the search. I learned this from Tim T. yesterday. Louis was sold on the idea that it will make him a lot of money.
 
Kyle:  Schafer is sue crazy.
 
Kyle:  Right before the Dateline special aired Tim and Louis asked if I could go to ABC to try to sell the footage in an attempt to recoup some of the money invested in the search efforts. ABC was very interested, but decided to wait until the Dateline special aired. After the show they came back to me and declined to purchase it because they felt too much of the story was already told by Dateline. That ended any communication with ABC. About 6 executive producers saw the footage, but none were allowed copies or any pictures. Everything remained in my possesion.
 
Kyle:  We believe the trap footage may be the missing piece which will raise a BIG question in the minds of the public everywhere. We're in the process of figuring out how to produce and spin the story most accurately and most effectively. Also, and completely independant and unrelated, John will be in Aruba tomorrow and will report soon. This is a different issue. He knows nothing of what we're about to do with the footage.
 
Kyle:  I prefer moving forward with the evidence I have access and knowledge about and using that as a can opener. Once the can is open, the worms are revealed.
 
Kyle:  I should clarify that the footage proceeds (if sold) wouldn't even have covered the cost of the project, but it would have helped.
 
Kyle:  No one else has access or copies of the photos or footage. All fingers point back to me when this leaks.
 
Kyle:  Louis does have legal rights to the footage regardless of Underwater Expeditions status. Louis personally signed the checks for the search.
 
Kyle:  I prefer moving forward with the evidence I have access and knowledge about and using that as a can opener. Once the can is open, the worms are revealed.

Kyle:  I will soon propose a meeting with Beth and other family members, myself, Tim Trahan, Peter DeVries, and whomever else necessary to go over the ROV video, contents, and case status. I would like a couple people very familiar with the case documents also present to help connect dots during the meeting. I would prefer meeting towards the end of April or mid-May to allow adequate time for things to shake themselves out if is going to. If necessary, I have an ABC (20/20) and CBS (early show) film crew ready and willing to take part in such a meeting should it require press coverage. I've already had a meeting with ABC about this and they are "definitely interested" at the executive level. We met in mid-Feb about this already. The question becomes timing, who needs to be there, and whether or not it's covered by the press. I prefer not, but it may be useful. DeVries doesn't need to be there in my opinion but he's good for ratings and helps ABC be cooperative if needed.
 
Kyle:   She [BETH] needs to know exactly what we found in the proper timing. The way to do that would be through Tim Trahan and I. I can arrange any meeting with him. He represents the owner and the rights to the data, in this case, Louis S. I have everything but I don't want to go around him for chain of custody reasons, professional courtesy, and friendship.
 
Kyle:   On the other hand, those differences has also caused a rift between Tim Trahan/Louis and myself with John (although John and I remain close friends and colleagues). The result is Tim, Louis and I are moving forward and John is left out of the loop.
 


Not only logic dictates, but common sense.
No matter how anyone tries to twist it, truth upholds!

ribbit.



Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #793 1/13/09
Post by: Blue Moon on January 17, 2009, 01:37:59 PM
naysayers, doubters and disbelievers, or just questions one may have,

ask yourself

Why would Kyle, with the agreement of Louis Schafer and Tim Tehran, fly home to the U.S. and try to sell the ROV/videos of the trap to the U.S. media and Peter deVries? If it's just rocks or someone else's body then it is supervelous isn't it for Kyle to have gone to all that trouble?

Why would Kyle and John Silvetti NOT contact the family directly and give them what they saw and tell them everything that went on?

If John Silvetti is above reproach, then why did he go back to Aruba to set up an office to do business with South America? Why did John Silvetti merge his GeoLab company with a DUTCH company?

If John Silvetti is above reproach, then why did he remove all things Holloway from the boat upon it's return
and not contact the family immediately to go over the important things that were discovered? Oh yes, because
he mapped the ocean floor for oil. Jug Twitty knew John Silvetti was an OIL GUY!

If John Silvetti is above reproach, then why did he turn away and allow ONLY ARUBAN DIVERS TO RETRIEVE EVIDENCE FROM THE CAGE/TRAP? It was only because the ROV was still filming that Kyle was able to take screen shots of that dive! Not because of John Silvetti's protection of evidence.

Beth gave me permission to expose the Aruban cover-up. AND other family members know that Beth did indeed give me that permission. The other freebirds know this to be true, they have all seen the emails.







Scratch my back and I will scratch yours.  In return for finding that pesky little cage with possible remains inside and turning it over to Aruba they in turn cut them some slack to setup operations on their fine island. 

Kermit,  all things Natalee was removed from the ship?  Has the FBI been able to retrieve this information or was it turned over to Aruba also?


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #793 1/13/09
Post by: Keepthefaith on January 17, 2009, 01:38:13 PM
naysayers, doubters and disbelievers, or just questions one may have,

ask yourself

Why would Kyle, with the agreement of Louis Schafer and Tim Tehran, fly home to the U.S. and try to sell the ROV/videos of the trap to the U.S. media and Peter deVries? If it's just rocks or someone else's body then it is supervelous isn't it for Kyle to have gone to all that trouble?

Why would Kyle and John Silvetti NOT contact the family directly and give them what they saw and tell them everything that went on?

If John Silvetti is above reproach, then why did he go back to Aruba to set up an office to do business with South America? Why did John Silvetti merge his GeoLab company with a DUTCH company?

If John Silvetti is above reproach, then why did he remove all things Holloway from the boat upon it's return
and not contact the family immediately to go over the important things that were discovered? Oh yes, because
he mapped the ocean floor for oil. Jug Twitty knew John Silvetti was an OIL GUY!

If John Silvetti is above reproach, then why did he turn away and allow ONLY ARUBAN DIVERS TO RETRIEVE EVIDENCE FROM THE CAGE/TRAP? It was only because the ROV was still filming that Kyle was able to take screen shots of that dive! Not because of John Silvetti's protection of evidence.

Beth gave me permission to expose the Aruban cover-up. AND other family members know that Beth did indeed give me that permission. The other freebirds know this to be true, they have all seen the emails.







OK Kermit.You get one too.Logic Dictates! ::MonkeyCool::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #793 1/13/09
Post by: Anna on January 17, 2009, 01:38:38 PM
Broken Arm Man:  Matt Henry (juggler):

 Many of you know juggler Matt Henry, who has done a couple of really wonderful Fringe shows in years past and won a world juggling championship in 2001. Matt was hit by a car in Aruba a few days ago, and he suffered a broken arm (in two places), fractured ribs and pelvis and a punctured lung.

The good news is that he has medical insurance and that his doctors are sure Matt will recover and juggle again. The bad news is that he'll be in a hospital in Aruba for the next few weeks before he's flown to a rehabilitation center in the U.S.

David Lee suggests that cards and letters from his friends and admirers may speed up the healing process. Matt's address is:
Matt Henry, Room 344
Horacio Oduber Hospital
Oranjestad, Aruba



Some people claim a medjet is overreacting...sheesh...


 ::MonkeyShocked::


OK, so which is it?  Hit by a car or jumped in a drunken stupor?

Since he has died, I think Aruba (read AHATA/ATA as they run everything on the island from tourism to ALE apparently) they have to make it HIS OWN FAULT just as they tried to do with Natalee.  This makes me so angry!  They don't want people to know that they drive like maniacs on that island as is amply demonstrated by the high number of accidents reported DAILY in their own press.

None of these injuries seem life threatening to me.  I don't get it.  He must have had other internal injuries.  Or inadequate care!

Another cover up, IMO!  And I would have used a Medjet if it were my child in place of Natalee and I had access to one.  I have NEVER understood why some tried to make that so mysterious.

We need an ANGRY MONKEY icon.



Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #793 1/13/09
Post by: Tamikosmom on January 17, 2009, 01:39:04 PM
I believe that You have lots of patience....after all You have been here fighting for Justice for Natalee for a long time....maybe You just don't recognize it....  ::MonkeyWink::   ::MonkeyCool::

Thanks hotping.

My ability to remain focused on the Natalee Holloway case can be considered a virtue by some but ... by many it is considered an addiction that needs to be broken.  Ask any member of my family except one of my two wonderful daughter-in-laws.  I knew this gal was a keeper the first time youngest son brought her home to meet hubby and I and ... I am thankful that that this gug concurred.  She has in indepth knowledge of the case and ... she keeps my file folders on the topic perfectly organized.  What a Godsend!

Janet


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #793 1/13/09
Post by: Kermit on January 17, 2009, 01:39:16 PM
Good Morning/Afternoon Kermit! Have Ya got any uplifting News or Tidbits that You can share with Us? PLease....give Us something to lift Our spirits in regards to the case.....that is if You can...... ::MonkeyWink::

Hello Hotping,

When the time is right I will.




Thank You......Just those seven little words....are encouraging!  ::MonkeyCool:: 

Beth KNOWS what I have been working on.
And I know exactly what Beth wants.

Everyone who wants to doubt or believe whatever someone else is telling them are free to do so.

Those individuals who want to call me names, be insidious will continue to do so, but it won't stop
the good people from bringing the truth out and expose the Aruba cover-up.
I believe the monkeys stand together!





Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #793 1/13/09
Post by: Blue Moon on January 17, 2009, 01:40:16 PM
Good Morning/Afternoon Kermit! Have Ya got any uplifting News or Tidbits that You can share with Us? PLease....give Us something to lift Our spirits in regards to the case.....that is if You can...... ::MonkeyWink::

Hello Hotping,

When the time is right I will.




Thank You......Just those seven little words....are encouraging!  ::MonkeyCool:: 

Beth KNOWS what I have been working on.
And I know exactly what Beth wants.

Everyone who wants to doubt or believe whatever someone else is telling them are free to do so.

Those individuals who want to call me names, be insidious will continue to do so, but it won't stop
the good people from bringing the truth out and expose the Aruba cover-up.
I believe the monkeys stand together!





You got that right Frog.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #793 1/13/09
Post by: Kermit on January 17, 2009, 01:40:32 PM
Good Morning/Afternoon Kermit! Have Ya got any uplifting News or Tidbits that You can share with Us? PLease....give Us something to lift Our spirits in regards to the case.....that is if You can...... ::MonkeyWink::

Hello Hotping,

When the time is right I will.


... but ... but ... Tamikosmom wants to know NOW!!!

 ::MonkeyWaa::

Janet

Patience is a virtue yes?



Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #793 1/13/09
Post by: Kermit on January 17, 2009, 01:42:11 PM
Good Morning/Afternoon Kermit! Have Ya got any uplifting News or Tidbits that You can share with Us? PLease....give Us something to lift Our spirits in regards to the case.....that is if You can...... ::MonkeyWink::

Hello Hotping,

When the time is right I will.


... but ... but ... Tamikosmom wants to know NOW!!!

 ::MonkeyWaa::

Janet
Me Too Janet.....but I keep remembering that  Patience is a Virtue!  ::MonkeyWink::

A virtue that God has yet to bless me with.

 ::MonkeyWaa::

Janet

God did bless you with a wonderful husband that understood that! ::MonkeyLaugh::

This guy does not understand my lack of sooo many virtues but ... incredibly he loves me anyways.  Keepthefaith ... I am blessed.

Janet

but he bought you a special purse.
I contend he DOES understand you.

 ::MonkeyCool::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #793 1/13/09
Post by: Tamikosmom on January 17, 2009, 01:42:31 PM
naysayers, doubters and disbelievers, or just questions one may have,

ask yourself

Why would Kyle, with the agreement of Louis Schafer and Tim Tehran, fly home to the U.S. and try to sell the ROV/videos of the trap to the U.S. media and Peter deVries? If it's just rocks or someone else's body then it is supervelous isn't it for Kyle to have gone to all that trouble?

Why would Kyle and John Silvetti NOT contact the family directly and give them what they saw and tell them everything that went on?

If John Silvetti is above reproach, then why did he go back to Aruba to set up an office to do business with South America? Why did John Silvetti merge his GeoLab company with a DUTCH company?

If John Silvetti is above reproach, then why did he remove all things Holloway from the boat upon it's return
and not contact the family immediately to go over the important things that were discovered? Oh yes, because
he mapped the ocean floor for oil. Jug Twitty knew John Silvetti was an OIL GUY!

If John Silvetti is above reproach, then why did he turn away and allow ONLY ARUBAN DIVERS TO RETRIEVE EVIDENCE FROM THE CAGE/TRAP? It was only because the ROV was still filming that Kyle was able to take screen shots of that dive! Not because of John Silvetti's protection of evidence.

Beth gave me permission to expose the Aruban cover-up. AND other family members know that Beth did indeed give me that permission. The other freebirds know this to be true, they have all seen the emails.


Ribbit.

Kermit ... I concur with Keepthefaith ... LOGIC DICTATES!!!

Janet


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #793 1/13/09
Post by: Tamikosmom on January 17, 2009, 01:44:30 PM
Good Morning/Afternoon Kermit! Have Ya got any uplifting News or Tidbits that You can share with Us? PLease....give Us something to lift Our spirits in regards to the case.....that is if You can...... ::MonkeyWink::

Hello Hotping,

When the time is right I will.


... but ... but ... Tamikosmom wants to know NOW!!!

 ::MonkeyWaa::

Janet
Me Too Janet.....but I keep remembering that  Patience is a Virtue!  ::MonkeyWink::

A virtue that God has yet to bless me with.

 ::MonkeyWaa::

Janet

God did bless you with a wonderful husband that understood that! ::MonkeyLaugh::

This guy does not understand my lack of sooo many virtues but ... incredibly he loves me anyways.  Keepthefaith ... I am blessed.

Janet

but he bought you a special purse.
I contend he DOES understand you.

 ::MonkeyCool::

Just because I left my purse in the shopping cart twice and ... drove home ... does not mean the a money belt for a 42nd wedding anniversary is an appropriate gift.

 ::MonkeyTongue::

Janet


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #793 1/13/09
Post by: Kermit on January 17, 2009, 01:44:41 PM
Good Morning/Afternoon Kermit! Have Ya got any uplifting News or Tidbits that You can share with Us? PLease....give Us something to lift Our spirits in regards to the case.....that is if You can...... ::MonkeyWink::

Hello Hotping,

When the time is right I will.


... but ... but ... Tamikosmom wants to know NOW!!!

 ::MonkeyWaa::

Janet

Patience is a virtue yes?



sorry, I did not see hotpings response before I responded.
Hotping has it right.

Patience.

Remember liars and manipulators always think they can out lie and out con people, but truth has a way
of eventually coming forth no matter what, especially when you have a number of very dedicated and loving monkeys standing with the girl!






Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #793 1/13/09
Post by: Blue Moon on January 17, 2009, 01:44:45 PM
O.K. I am going to put this out there as I have not seen it discussed yet.  Do not misconstrue what I am asking here as I only ask to get a better understanding what is being said.  This is about the 2nd or 3rd time I have read Jug's name in conjuncture with John Silvetti.  What is Jug's connection with getting this ship to make the trip to search for Natalee in the ocean?  (**again, I fully like Jug, just asking an honest question here**).  Could Jug have set this up along with his connections with Jossy Mansur?  I know I am a tangent concerning Jossy but something does not add up with Jossy and Eduador mansur to me.  JUST asking, please don't throw nanners at me.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #793 1/13/09
Post by: hotping on January 17, 2009, 01:45:07 PM
I believe that You have lots of patience....after all You have been here fighting for Justice for Natalee for a long time....maybe You just don't recognize it....  ::MonkeyWink::   ::MonkeyCool::

Thanks hotping.

My ability to remain focused on the Natalee Holloway case can be considered a virtue by some but ... by many it is considered an addiction that needs to be broken.  Ask any member of my family except one of my two wonderful daughter-in-laws.  I knew this gal was a keeper the first time youngest son brought her home to meet hubby and I and ... I am thankful that that this gug concurred.  She has in indepth knowledge of the case and ... she keeps my file folders on the topic perfectly organized.  What a Godsend!

Janet

You're Welcome Janet! Please tell that Wonderful Daughter in Law of Yours....Thank You Very Much for Everything She helps You do to keep all that Information organized so that You can keep Us Informed/Reminded of Everything in this case at a moments notice....You Both are Great!  ::MonkeyCool::

Sincerely
Hotping


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #793 1/13/09
Post by: Anna on January 17, 2009, 01:45:21 PM
Good Morning/Afternoon Kermit! Have Ya got any uplifting News or Tidbits that You can share with Us? PLease....give Us something to lift Our spirits in regards to the case.....that is if You can...... ::MonkeyWink::

Hello Hotping,

When the time is right I will.


... but ... but ... Tamikosmom wants to know NOW!!!

 ::MonkeyWaa::

Janet
Me Too Janet.....but I keep remembering that  Patience is a Virtue!  ::MonkeyWink::


OK, let's vote or do a poll.

How many think the time is right NOW?


 ::MonkeyHaHa:: ::MonkeyHaHa:: ::MonkeyHaHa::

Just kidding!


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #793 1/13/09
Post by: Kermit on January 17, 2009, 01:45:40 PM
Good Morning/Afternoon Kermit! Have Ya got any uplifting News or Tidbits that You can share with Us? PLease....give Us something to lift Our spirits in regards to the case.....that is if You can...... ::MonkeyWink::

Hello Hotping,

When the time is right I will.


... but ... but ... Tamikosmom wants to know NOW!!!

 ::MonkeyWaa::

Janet
Me Too Janet.....but I keep remembering that  Patience is a Virtue!  ::MonkeyWink::

A virtue that God has yet to bless me with.

 ::MonkeyWaa::

Janet

God did bless you with a wonderful husband that understood that! ::MonkeyLaugh::

This guy does not understand my lack of sooo many virtues but ... incredibly he loves me anyways.  Keepthefaith ... I am blessed.

Janet

but he bought you a special purse.
I contend he DOES understand you.

 ::MonkeyCool::

Just because I left my purse in the shopping cart twice and ... drove home ... does not mean the a money belt for a 42nd wedding anniversary is an appropriate gift.

 ::MonkeyTongue::

Janet

Perhaps not, but veggie was trying.
 ::MonkeyDance::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #793 1/13/09
Post by: Kermit on January 17, 2009, 01:48:05 PM
Quote from: Anna
OK, let's vote or do a poll.
How many think the time is right NOW?[/quote

Hopefully, we can bring them all down. ALL of them.






Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #793 1/13/09
Post by: Kermit on January 17, 2009, 01:49:02 PM
naysayers, doubters and disbelievers, or just questions one may have,

ask yourself

Why would Kyle, with the agreement of Louis Schafer and Tim Tehran, fly home to the U.S. and try to sell the ROV/videos of the trap to the U.S. media and Peter deVries? If it's just rocks or someone else's body then it is supervelous isn't it for Kyle to have gone to all that trouble?

Why would Kyle and John Silvetti NOT contact the family directly and give them what they saw and tell them everything that went on?

If John Silvetti is above reproach, then why did he go back to Aruba to set up an office to do business with South America? Why did John Silvetti merge his GeoLab company with a DUTCH company?

If John Silvetti is above reproach, then why did he remove all things Holloway from the boat upon it's return
and not contact the family immediately to go over the important things that were discovered? Oh yes, because
he mapped the ocean floor for oil. Jug Twitty knew John Silvetti was an OIL GUY!

If John Silvetti is above reproach, then why did he turn away and allow ONLY ARUBAN DIVERS TO RETRIEVE EVIDENCE FROM THE CAGE/TRAP? It was only because the ROV was still filming that Kyle was able to take screen shots of that dive! Not because of John Silvetti's protection of evidence.

Beth gave me permission to expose the Aruban cover-up. AND other family members know that Beth did indeed give me that permission. The other freebirds know this to be true, they have all seen the emails.







Scratch my back and I will scratch yours.  In return for finding that pesky little cage with possible remains inside and turning it over to Aruba they in turn cut them some slack to setup operations on their fine island. 

Kermit,  all things Natalee was removed from the ship?  Has the FBI been able to retrieve this information or was it turned over to Aruba also?

I'll just say, I think John Q. Kelly is aware of it.



Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #793 1/13/09
Post by: hotping on January 17, 2009, 01:49:08 PM
Good Morning/Afternoon Kermit! Have Ya got any uplifting News or Tidbits that You can share with Us? PLease....give Us something to lift Our spirits in regards to the case.....that is if You can...... ::MonkeyWink::

Hello Hotping,

When the time is right I will.




Thank You......Just those seven little words....are encouraging!  ::MonkeyCool:: 

Beth KNOWS what I have been working on.
And I know exactly what Beth wants.

Everyone who wants to doubt or believe whatever someone else is telling them are free to do so.

Those individuals who want to call me names, be insidious will continue to do so, but it won't stop
the good people from bringing the truth out and expose the Aruba cover-up.
I believe the monkeys stand together!




YESSS!  ::cartwheel:: Thanks Again Kermit!  ::MonkeyWink::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #793 1/13/09
Post by: Tamikosmom on January 17, 2009, 01:50:33 PM

Beth KNOWS what I have been working on.
And I know exactly what Beth wants.

Everyone who wants to doubt or believe whatever someone else is telling them are free to do so.

Those individuals who want to call me names, be insidious will continue to do so, but it won't stop
the good people from bringing the truth out and expose the Aruba cover-up.

I believe the monkeys stand together!



Kermit ... the sad truth is ... Monkeys are very divided on this issue and fled the cage.  Even Freebirds have flown the coop.

 ::MonkeyWaa::

The time when you are able to reveal all cannot come soon enough.  Faith in your words are not enough for some Monkeys and Freebirds.

Janet


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #793 1/13/09
Post by: Anna on January 17, 2009, 01:52:00 PM

Just because I left my purse in the shopping cart twice and ... drove home ... does not mean the a money belt for a 42nd wedding anniversary is an appropriate gift.

 ::MonkeyTongue::

Janet


I did that once, too, Janet.  It is very hard to explain.  I also got out of the car and locked it once with the motor still running.  At Disney World, no less.  That was even harder to explain to the guys who came to open the door, like Security.  They looked at me very carefully like trying to determine if I was on drugs or something.  No, just three wild little boys in the back seat on that one!


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #793 1/13/09
Post by: Blue Moon on January 17, 2009, 01:52:40 PM
Kermit,

Jan says Eduardo Mansur was not on the ship.  Hotshot says that Jossy says he was on the ship the entire time.

Do you know if he was?

Thanks.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #793 1/13/09
Post by: Kermit on January 17, 2009, 01:54:59 PM
Quote from: OK Kermit.You get one too.Logic Dictates!
[/quote

You know what, when I see your nic, I have that image of that lady in that picture from the Seattle newspaper of you! Standing behind the counter of sweet smelling cupcakes and breads! lol

It's kind of more then logic. It's common sense and it's the truth!
I guess Peter deVries will say, "Yeah, they were trying to sell us rock pictures of the rov dive".

Instead Louis Schafer sold it for a documentary!
go figger!










Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #793 1/13/09
Post by: San on January 17, 2009, 01:55:03 PM
Good Morning/Afternoon Kermit! Have Ya got any uplifting News or Tidbits that You can share with Us? PLease....give Us something to lift Our spirits in regards to the case.....that is if You can...... ::MonkeyWink::

Hello Hotping,

When the time is right I will.




Thank You......Just those seven little words....are encouraging!  ::MonkeyCool:: 

Beth KNOWS what I have been working on.
And I know exactly what Beth wants.

Everyone who wants to doubt or believe whatever someone else is telling them are free to do so.

Those individuals who want to call me names, be insidious will continue to do so, but it won't stop the good people from bringing the truth out and expose the Aruba cover-up.
I believe the monkeys stand together!


Yes we do.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #793 1/13/09
Post by: Kermit on January 17, 2009, 01:55:55 PM
Kermit,

Jan says Eduardo Mansur was not on the ship.  Hotshot says that Jossy says he was on the ship the entire time.

Do you know if he was?

Thanks.

Looked like him to me in that picture that someone posted at SM.

Plus, I know that Kyle trusted Eduardo.



Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #793 1/13/09
Post by: Tamikosmom on January 17, 2009, 01:57:33 PM
naysayers, doubters and disbelievers, or just questions one may have,

ask yourself

Why would Kyle, with the agreement of Louis Schafer and Tim Tehran, fly home to the U.S. and try to sell the ROV/videos of the trap to the U.S. media and Peter deVries? If it's just rocks or someone else's body then it is supervelous isn't it for Kyle to have gone to all that trouble?

Why would Kyle and John Silvetti NOT contact the family directly and give them what they saw and tell them everything that went on?

If John Silvetti is above reproach, then why did he go back to Aruba to set up an office to do business with South America? Why did John Silvetti merge his GeoLab company with a DUTCH company?

If John Silvetti is above reproach, then why did he remove all things Holloway from the boat upon it's return
and not contact the family immediately to go over the important things that were discovered? Oh yes, because
he mapped the ocean floor for oil. Jug Twitty knew John Silvetti was an OIL GUY!

If John Silvetti is above reproach, then why did he turn away and allow ONLY ARUBAN DIVERS TO RETRIEVE EVIDENCE FROM THE CAGE/TRAP? It was only because the ROV was still filming that Kyle was able to take screen shots of that dive! Not because of John Silvetti's protection of evidence.

Beth gave me permission to expose the Aruban cover-up. AND other family members know that Beth did indeed give me that permission. The other freebirds know this to be true, they have all seen the emails.







Scratch my back and I will scratch yours.  In return for finding that pesky little cage with possible remains inside and turning it over to Aruba they in turn cut them some slack to setup operations on their fine island. 

Kermit,  all things Natalee was removed from the ship?  Has the FBI been able to retrieve this information or was it turned over to Aruba also?

I'll just say, I think John Q. Kelly is aware of it.



According to wingnut ... one of our Monkey Freebirds ...


Tamikosmom
Re: Natalee Case Discussion #787 12/24/08 -
« Reply #420 on: December 30, 2008, 07:21:43 PM »


wingnut

Using Kyle Kingman's own words in his posts to the Natalee's Freebirds which can be traced through IP number ...

1.  Is there no way the family and John Q. Kelly can put pressure on the "powers that be" in Aruba?

2.  Is there no way that the family can expose the Persistence hoax through media sources? 

Janet

http://scaredmonkeys.net/index.php?topic=4269.msg603423#msg603423


wingnut
Re: Natalee Case Discussion #787 12/24/08 -
« Reply #458 on: December 30, 2008, 08:00:48 PM »


Hello Janet. 

I wish I had the answers.  I know that JQK has the information now.  I personally provided it to him. 

http://scaredmonkeys.net/index.php?topic=4269.msg603501#msg603501


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #793 1/13/09
Post by: hotping on January 17, 2009, 01:58:10 PM
Good Morning/Afternoon Kermit! Have Ya got any uplifting News or Tidbits that You can share with Us? PLease....give Us something to lift Our spirits in regards to the case.....that is if You can...... ::MonkeyWink::

Hello Hotping,

When the time is right I will.




Thank You......Just those seven little words....are encouraging!  ::MonkeyCool:: 

Beth KNOWS what I have been working on.
And I know exactly what Beth wants.

Everyone who wants to doubt or believe whatever someone else is telling them are free to do so.

Those individuals who want to call me names, be insidious will continue to do so, but it won't stop
the good people from bringing the truth out and expose the Aruba cover-up.
I believe the monkeys stand together!




YESSS!  ::cartwheel:: Thanks Again Kermit!  ::MonkeyWink::
That is about that Beth knows about what You are working on...I just wanted to clarify My post....  ::MonkeyConfused:: Yes most of the Monkeys do stand together....Some have left but something tells Me some will be back.....at least I hope sooo... ::MonkeyWink::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #793 1/13/09
Post by: Keepthefaith on January 17, 2009, 02:01:07 PM
Quote from: OK Kermit.You get one too.Logic Dictates!
[/quote

You know what, when I see your nic, I have that image of that lady in that picture from the Seattle newspaper of you! Standing behind the counter of sweet smelling cupcakes and breads! lol

It's kind of more then logic. It's common sense and it's the truth!
I guess Peter deVries will say, "Yeah, they were trying to sell us rock pictures of the rov dive".

Instead Louis Schafer sold it for a documentary!
go figger!










If i owned a bakery.I for one would drive the business into the ground one cupcake at a time.I do enjoy bringing sunshine into ones lives! ::MonkeyDance::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #793 1/13/09
Post by: Anna on January 17, 2009, 02:01:20 PM
According to wingnut ... one of our Monkey Freebirds ...


Tamikosmom
Re: Natalee Case Discussion #787 12/24/08 -
« Reply #420 on: December 30, 2008, 07:21:43 PM »


wingnut

Using Kyle Kingman's own words in his posts to the Natalee's Freebirds which can be traced through IP number ...

1.  Is there no way the family and John Q. Kelly can put pressure on the "powers that be" in Aruba?

2.  Is there no way that the family can expose the Persistence hoax through media sources? 

Janet

http://scaredmonkeys.net/index.php?topic=4269.msg603423#msg603423


wingnut
Re: Natalee Case Discussion #787 12/24/08 -
« Reply #458 on: December 30, 2008, 08:00:48 PM »


Hello Janet. 

I wish I had the answers.  I know that JQK has the information now.  I personally provided it to him. 

http://scaredmonkeys.net/index.php?topic=4269.msg603501#msg603501



Perhaps JQK discussed this with Mos on his last trip to Aruba.  There had to be a good reason for his going there.

However, it happened in ARUBAN waters.  And that is a lawless place.

Not sure what can actually be done about it now.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #793 1/13/09
Post by: Kermit on January 17, 2009, 02:05:19 PM

Beth KNOWS what I have been working on.
And I know exactly what Beth wants.

Everyone who wants to doubt or believe whatever someone else is telling them are free to do so.

Those individuals who want to call me names, be insidious will continue to do so, but it won't stop
the good people from bringing the truth out and expose the Aruba cover-up.

I believe the monkeys stand together!



Kermit ... the sad truth is ... Monkeys are very divided on this issue and fled the cage.  Even Freebirds have flown the coop.

 ::MonkeyWaa::

The time when you are able to reveal all cannot come soon enough.  Faith in your words are not enough for some Monkeys and Freebirds.

Janet

Janet,

having been involved in very high-profile cases before, their are always those that are unable to discern truth even when it is so obvious to everyone else. It's like the first time you had to realize the kids weren't perfect I would assume.

You (not you per say) want to doubt and the people they want to believe are very good at the con and twisting the truth around.

In my case, when that was done to me and other freebirds, we had shall I say, other evidence to the contrary.

Freebirds have not flown the coop.
They are fine and well. ::MonkeyCool::



Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #793 1/13/09
Post by: hotping on January 17, 2009, 02:06:34 PM
According to wingnut ... one of our Monkey Freebirds ...


Tamikosmom
Re: Natalee Case Discussion #787 12/24/08 -
« Reply #420 on: December 30, 2008, 07:21:43 PM »


wingnut

Using Kyle Kingman's own words in his posts to the Natalee's Freebirds which can be traced through IP number ...

1.  Is there no way the family and John Q. Kelly can put pressure on the "powers that be" in Aruba?

2.  Is there no way that the family can expose the Persistence hoax through media sources? 

Janet

http://scaredmonkeys.net/index.php?topic=4269.msg603423#msg603423


wingnut
Re: Natalee Case Discussion #787 12/24/08 -
« Reply #458 on: December 30, 2008, 08:00:48 PM »


Hello Janet. 

I wish I had the answers.  I know that JQK has the information now.  I personally provided it to him. 

http://scaredmonkeys.net/index.php?topic=4269.msg603501#msg603501



Perhaps JQK discussed this with Mos on his last trip to Aruba.  There had to be a good reason for his going there.

However, it happened in ARUBAN waters.  And that is a lawless place.

Not sure what can actually be done about it now.
Maybe JQK could promise MOS more Negative media coverage that would expose the coverup and truth about the cage/trap.....that might rattle Aruba...Ya Think... ::MonkeyShocked::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #793 1/13/09
Post by: Anna on January 17, 2009, 02:11:45 PM
It just makes me ill that ALE was allowed sole custody of the contents of that trap.

Why on earth did they allow that to happen?  Any contact with the family at all would have told them NOT to do that!  Was there too little communication?

If what Kyle says is not true, he shouldn't have said it.  Why on earth would he invent something so damaging and potentially even illegal?  I don't think he was seeking attention.

Kyle created this controversy, not Kermit!  It is very unfortunate.  I think he changed his tune when he realized his words could be leaked to his potentially future/continuing boss.

And contrary to what some say about me, I do not have any agenda other than finding the truth and some acceptable and reasonable resolution for Natalee's family and the rest of us.  We, too, have an interest in seeking justice for this U.S. citizen. 

If not us, who?


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #793 1/13/09
Post by: Kermit on January 17, 2009, 02:12:40 PM
According to wingnut ... one of our Monkey Freebirds ...


Tamikosmom
Re: Natalee Case Discussion #787 12/24/08 -
« Reply #420 on: December 30, 2008, 07:21:43 PM »


wingnut

Using Kyle Kingman's own words in his posts to the Natalee's Freebirds which can be traced through IP number ...

1.  Is there no way the family and John Q. Kelly can put pressure on the "powers that be" in Aruba?

2.  Is there no way that the family can expose the Persistence hoax through media sources? 

Janet

http://scaredmonkeys.net/index.php?topic=4269.msg603423#msg603423


wingnut
Re: Natalee Case Discussion #787 12/24/08 -
« Reply #458 on: December 30, 2008, 08:00:48 PM »


Hello Janet. 

I wish I had the answers.  I know that JQK has the information now.  I personally provided it to him. 

http://scaredmonkeys.net/index.php?topic=4269.msg603501#msg603501



Perhaps JQK discussed this with Mos on his last trip to Aruba.  There had to be a good reason for his going there.

However, it happened in ARUBAN waters.  And that is a lawless place.

Not sure what can actually be done about it now.

Winger talked to John Q. Kelly.

And sometimes its the knowing that we know what you did Aruba that has a lot of power!

Being relentless is also something we, as American's, who fight for justice, and never giving up as long as it takes to uncover the truth and expose it all.




Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #793 1/13/09
Post by: Kermit on January 17, 2009, 02:15:06 PM
It just makes me ill that ALE was allowed sole custody of the contents of that trap.

Why on earth did they allow that to happen?  Any contact with the family at all would have told them NOT to do that!  Was there too little communication?

If what Kyle says is not true, he shouldn't have said it.  Why on earth would he invent something so damaging and potentially even illegal?  I don't think he was seeking attention.

Kyle created this controversy, not Kermit!  It is very unfortunate.  I think he changed his tune when he realized his words could be leaked to his potentially future/continuing boss.

And contrary to what some say about me, I do not have any agenda other than finding the truth and some acceptable and reasonable resolution for Natalee's family and the rest of us.  We, too, have an interest in seeking justice for this U.S. citizen. 

If not us, who?

You are absolutey right Anna.

Kyle knew that when the photos/document was released that all would point back to him. Meaning, John Silvetti would know and Kyle had already been accused by John Silvetti for posting at SM about the pond.




Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #793 1/13/09
Post by: Kermit on January 17, 2009, 02:16:18 PM
According to wingnut ... one of our Monkey Freebirds ...


Tamikosmom
Re: Natalee Case Discussion #787 12/24/08 -
« Reply #420 on: December 30, 2008, 07:21:43 PM »


wingnut

Using Kyle Kingman's own words in his posts to the Natalee's Freebirds which can be traced through IP number ...

1.  Is there no way the family and John Q. Kelly can put pressure on the "powers that be" in Aruba?

2.  Is there no way that the family can expose the Persistence hoax through media sources? 

Janet

http://scaredmonkeys.net/index.php?topic=4269.msg603423#msg603423


wingnut
Re: Natalee Case Discussion #787 12/24/08 -
« Reply #458 on: December 30, 2008, 08:00:48 PM »


Hello Janet. 

I wish I had the answers.  I know that JQK has the information now.  I personally provided it to him. 

http://scaredmonkeys.net/index.php?topic=4269.msg603501#msg603501



Perhaps JQK discussed this with Mos on his last trip to Aruba.  There had to be a good reason for his going there.

However, it happened in ARUBAN waters.  And that is a lawless place.

Not sure what can actually be done about it now.
Maybe JQK could promise MOS more Negative media coverage that would expose the coverup and truth about the cage/trap.....that might rattle Aruba...Ya Think... ::MonkeyShocked::

I am not privy to John Q. Kelly's plans.
I know that the more that is exposed about Aruba the better!

And trust me there is a lot.



Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #793 1/13/09
Post by: Kermit on January 17, 2009, 02:17:38 PM
Quote from: Keepthefaith
If i owned a bakery.I for one would drive the business into the ground one cupcake at a time.I do enjoy bringing sunshine into ones lives!
[/quote

If you owned a bakery, I think I would have to visit it everyday for your sunshine!
And the smell of the food!



Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #793 1/13/09
Post by: Tamikosmom on January 17, 2009, 02:17:41 PM
Kermit,

Jan says Eduardo Mansur was not on the ship.  Hotshot says that Jossy says he was on the ship the entire time.

Do you know if he was?

Thanks.

Looked like him to me in that picture that someone posted at SM.

Plus, I know that Kyle trusted Eduardo.



When I consider the Jossy Mansur, CAPS and John Silvetti connection in regards to the pond witness ...

::MonkeyNoNo::

According to Kyle's own words ... at one time he had complete trust of those who have been behind the coverup that has prevented justice from prevailing for Natalee Holloway since the getgo.  I question Kyle's ability to decern between the good guys and the bad buys.

On the other hand ... Private Eye's ability to decern is amazing.

Janet

++++++

KYLE KINGMAN - IN HIS OWN WORDS

oceanexploration
Re: Natalee Case Discussion #715 1/25 -
« Reply #103 on: January 26, 2008, 12:38:25 PM »


Thought you all may find this interesting if you're willing to accept it-

To date, the Aruban police and dive team has been a tremendous help. They've honestly done a great job. Over the last month we've established a very good working relationship based on openness and trust. Most of the relationship success was due to getting the media out of the way and working together shoulder to shoulder over time. We've helped each other however and whenever we can. They've treated us with decency and respect and we have treated them as friends and allies, which they are. Most of the police and divers are new since this case started and both eager and careful to do things right. I wish we had a month ahead of the project just to establish the relationships and trust. I know many of you would likely doubt this view, but it's based on the experiences in the field of the entire search team. I too was extremely worried, paranoid, and suspecting in the beginning. Now, it's clear we're all working towards a common goal.

http://scaredmonkeys.net/index.php?topic=2539.msg332457;topicseen#msg332457


PRIVATE EYE - IN HIS OWN WORDS

private eye
Re: Natalee Case Discussion #746 4/4
« Reply #499 on: April 09, 2008, 12:39:50 AM »


If I understood Kyle correctly, and that would be that the Arubans retrieved and possessed all finds, not sharing anything with the crew, then that effort was a waste of time and effort. The only thing it could have accomplished was to locate additional evidence for the Arubans to destroy.  The effort was superb, but the game was fixed.

http://scaredmonkeys.net/index.php?topic=2769.msg372245;topicseen#msg372245


private eye
Re: Natalee Case Discussion #742 3/10 -
« Reply #686 on: March 13, 2008, 06:38:07 PM »


But sharing information with people who work for people who are directly orchestrating the cover up, Rudy, or the Dutch, is the most irresponsible investigating I can imagine. What kills this investigation is people having to come into it, wanting to apply basic investigatory protocols into place, and then having those channels sabotage the new evidence that the new players discover. Of course, as is happened everytime in this case, the new people eventually come to a point where the manipulation of the evidence is undeniable, but by then the fruits of their work are gone, and there is simply another member of the believers of the cover up group. What I pray that Kyle and the crew of the Persistence will determine, is that  regardless of how hard working the man that they are working with appears to work, his work belongs to Rudy, and Rudy belongs to the local dutch.

We are not hysterical, ignorant, paranoid people. We have seen the cover up in action, in broad daylight, with impunity, and if you disregard our warnings, you will become the next chump in a series of chumps, no matter how sophisticated your equipment, the level of your educational achievement, or the extent of your job skills and work history.

http://scaredmonkeys.net/index.php?topic=2689.msg364750#msg364750


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #793 1/13/09
Post by: Keepthefaith on January 17, 2009, 02:18:40 PM
Kermit.How did Kyle come to going to Norway,as well as Egypt?How would he go about getting what would seem to be jobs that would be quite lucrative?


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #793 1/13/09
Post by: Kermit on January 17, 2009, 02:21:58 PM
O.K. I am going to put this out there as I have not seen it discussed yet.  Do not misconstrue what I am asking here as I only ask to get a better understanding what is being said.  This is about the 2nd or 3rd time I have read Jug's name in conjuncture with John Silvetti.  What is Jug's connection with getting this ship to make the trip to search for Natalee in the ocean?  (**again, I fully like Jug, just asking an honest question here**).  Could Jug have set this up along with his connections with Jossy Mansur?  I know I am a tangent concerning Jossy but something does not add up with Jossy and Eduador mansur to me.  JUST asking, please don't throw nanners at me.

If I recall correctly of what I was told - Jug told someone about John Silvetti being an oil guy.




Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #793 1/13/09
Post by: Kermit on January 17, 2009, 02:25:16 PM
Kermit.How did Kyle come to going to Norway,as well as Egypt?How would he go about getting what would seem to be jobs that would be quite lucrative?

He went to John Silvetti's home over the 4th of July weekend.
Then he told us he was going to Norway.
A Dutch agent then offered him the Egypt deal. Kyle posted on his blog, he made so much money he was going to give some of it away to the poor people in Egypt.

I wonder why, now that you brought this up,  why didn't Kyle contribute some of his extra cash towards the return of the RV Persistence to Aruba to continue the search for Natalee, you know with that smaller boat they needed and were asking all of us for funds?

Kyle said more then once, John Silvetti is his boss.




Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #793 1/13/09
Post by: Anna on January 17, 2009, 02:25:34 PM
I thought Kyle went to Egypt for a Dutch company and found Silvetti involved in that project as well.  Would be embarrassing if Silvetti knew what Kyle had been saying about him?

The Dutch are all over oil all over the world.  Some of the global companies are Dutch.  Odd for such a small country but they have always been very entrepreneurial and seafaring merchants, etc.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #793 1/13/09
Post by: Anna on January 17, 2009, 02:27:25 PM
Sorry, Kermit, didn't see your post as we posted at the same time.  Fortunately, the same thing basically but you know more about all that than I do.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #793 1/13/09
Post by: Keepthefaith on January 17, 2009, 02:27:57 PM
Kermit.How did Kyle come to going to Norway,as well as Egypt?How would he go about getting what would seem to be jobs that would be quite lucrative?

He went to John Silvetti's home over the 4th of July weekend.
Then he told us he was going to Norway.
A Dutch agent then offered him the Egypt deal. Kyle posted on his blog, he made so much money he was going to give some of it away to the poor people in Egypt.

I wonder why, now that you brought this up,  why didn't Kyle contribute some of his extra cash towards the return of the RV Persistence to Aruba to continue the search for Natalee, you know with that smaller boat they needed and were asking all of us for funds?

Kyle said more then once, John Silvetti is his boss.




Was Silvetti that well connected Globally as to secure such jobs or did they form relationships while in Aruba?


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #793 1/13/09
Post by: Kermit on January 17, 2009, 02:29:10 PM
Kermit,

Jan says Eduardo Mansur was not on the ship.  Hotshot says that Jossy says he was on the ship the entire time.

Do you know if he was?

Thanks.

Looked like him to me in that picture that someone posted at SM.

Plus, I know that Kyle trusted Eduardo.



When I consider the Jossy Mansur, CAPS and John Silvetti connection in regards to the pond witness ...

::MonkeyNoNo::

According to Kyle's own words ... at one time he had complete trust of those who have been behind the coverup that has prevented justice from prevailing for Natalee Holloway since the getgo.  I question Kyle's ability to decern between the good guys and the bad buys.

On the other hand ... Private Eye's ability to decern is amazing.

Janet

++++++

KYLE KINGMAN - IN HIS OWN WORDS

oceanexploration
Re: Natalee Case Discussion #715 1/25 -
« Reply #103 on: January 26, 2008, 12:38:25 PM »


Thought you all may find this interesting if you're willing to accept it-

To date, the Aruban police and dive team has been a tremendous help. They've honestly done a great job. Over the last month we've established a very good working relationship based on openness and trust. Most of the relationship success was due to getting the media out of the way and working together shoulder to shoulder over time. We've helped each other however and whenever we can. They've treated us with decency and respect and we have treated them as friends and allies, which they are. Most of the police and divers are new since this case started and both eager and careful to do things right. I wish we had a month ahead of the project just to establish the relationships and trust. I know many of you would likely doubt this view, but it's based on the experiences in the field of the entire search team. I too was extremely worried, paranoid, and suspecting in the beginning. Now, it's clear we're all working towards a common goal.

http://scaredmonkeys.net/index.php?topic=2539.msg332457;topicseen#msg332457


PRIVATE EYE - IN HIS OWN WORDS

private eye
Re: Natalee Case Discussion #746 4/4
« Reply #499 on: April 09, 2008, 12:39:50 AM »


If I understood Kyle correctly, and that would be that the Arubans retrieved and possessed all finds, not sharing anything with the crew, then that effort was a waste of time and effort. The only thing it could have accomplished was to locate additional evidence for the Arubans to destroy.  The effort was superb, but the game was fixed.

http://scaredmonkeys.net/index.php?topic=2769.msg372245;topicseen#msg372245


private eye
Re: Natalee Case Discussion #742 3/10 -
« Reply #686 on: March 13, 2008, 06:38:07 PM »


But sharing information with people who work for people who are directly orchestrating the cover up, Rudy, or the Dutch, is the most irresponsible investigating I can imagine. What kills this investigation is people having to come into it, wanting to apply basic investigatory protocols into place, and then having those channels sabotage the new evidence that the new players discover. Of course, as is happened everytime in this case, the new people eventually come to a point where the manipulation of the evidence is undeniable, but by then the fruits of their work are gone, and there is simply another member of the believers of the cover up group. What I pray that Kyle and the crew of the Persistence will determine, is that  regardless of how hard working the man that they are working with appears to work, his work belongs to Rudy, and Rudy belongs to the local dutch.

We are not hysterical, ignorant, paranoid people. We have seen the cover up in action, in broad daylight, with impunity, and if you disregard our warnings, you will become the next chump in a series of chumps, no matter how sophisticated your equipment, the level of your educational achievement, or the extent of your job skills and work history.

http://scaredmonkeys.net/index.php?topic=2689.msg364750#msg364750

Does it seem odd to anyone besides me that there was a tennis shoe in the cage photo,
there was a tennis shoe on the front page of Dairo
there was a tennis shoe that CAPS said he lost in that pond when he was a kid (posted on SM someplace)
and
Caps said there was human remains and a tennis shoe in the pond




Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #793 1/13/09
Post by: klaasend on January 17, 2009, 02:29:40 PM
Just going over some old posts here and there...mostly there  ::MonkeyCool::

Marine Surveys, LLC split from its sister company,
APS, in 2006. Marine Surveys primary focus is
Construction Surveying and Geophysical Services.
Marine Surveys handles all projects, within the
Group, that require stamped certification by a
Professional Land Surveyor (PLS).

The Marine Surveys Project Management Team
is experienced in Construction Surveys from the
Shallowest of Waters to Thousands of Feet. Just as
important as the performance of the field operations,
the Team is very experienced in Project Planning by
working shoulder to shoulder with our customers
as well as developing detailed survey procedures

Marine Surveys provides the full range of
Geophysical Services, ranging from Shallow
Hazard P/L Pre- Route Surveys to searching for
“downed” aircraft. The R/V Persistence serves as
our flagship for Acquisition Services.

As a member of the JD Silvetti Group of Companies,
Marine Surveys supports the “Zero Tolerance”
downtime commitment through critical path
redundancy and the “Zero Tolerance” Policy
inherent in our HS&E Program. Safety through
Commitment

MANAGING MEMBER: JOHN D. SILVETTI
GENERAL MANAGER: CONRAD DAIGLE
OFFICE MANAGER: MARIANNE VOORHIES
SALES & MARKETING MANAGER: TIM BOYER
SAFETY COORDINATOR: ROBERTA SILVETTI
IT/SOFTWARE DEVELOPMENT MANAGER: RICK PUTNAM
ACCOUNTS PAYABLE: RENEE PRUDHOME
FINANCE MANAGER: REBECCA MARCANTEL
EQUIPMENT LABORATORY MANAGER: AARON PRIEST
CHIEF GEOSCINTIST: Dr. ROB FLOYD
CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER: ERIC SWINNEY


http://silvettigroup.com/ms.html


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #793 1/13/09
Post by: wreck on January 17, 2009, 02:31:34 PM
Kermit,

Jan says Eduardo Mansur was not on the ship.  Hotshot says that Jossy says he was on the ship the entire time.

Do you know if he was?

Thanks.

Looked like him to me in that picture that someone posted at SM.

Plus, I know that Kyle trusted Eduardo.



When I consider the Jossy Mansur, CAPS and John Silvetti connection in regards to the pond witness ...

::MonkeyNoNo::

According to Kyle's own words ... at one time he had complete trust of those who have been behind the coverup that has prevented justice from prevailing for Natalee Holloway since the getgo.  I question Kyle's ability to decern between the good guys and the bad buys.

On the other hand ... Private Eye's ability to decern is amazing.

Janet

++++++

KYLE KINGMAN - IN HIS OWN WORDS

oceanexploration
Re: Natalee Case Discussion #715 1/25 -
« Reply #103 on: January 26, 2008, 12:38:25 PM »


Thought you all may find this interesting if you're willing to accept it-

To date, the Aruban police and dive team has been a tremendous help. They've honestly done a great job. Over the last month we've established a very good working relationship based on openness and trust. Most of the relationship success was due to getting the media out of the way and working together shoulder to shoulder over time. We've helped each other however and whenever we can. They've treated us with decency and respect and we have treated them as friends and allies, which they are. Most of the police and divers are new since this case started and both eager and careful to do things right. I wish we had a month ahead of the project just to establish the relationships and trust. I know many of you would likely doubt this view, but it's based on the experiences in the field of the entire search team. I too was extremely worried, paranoid, and suspecting in the beginning. Now, it's clear we're all working towards a common goal.

http://scaredmonkeys.net/index.php?topic=2539.msg332457;topicseen#msg332457


PRIVATE EYE - IN HIS OWN WORDS

private eye
Re: Natalee Case Discussion #746 4/4
« Reply #499 on: April 09, 2008, 12:39:50 AM »


If I understood Kyle correctly, and that would be that the Arubans retrieved and possessed all finds, not sharing anything with the crew, then that effort was a waste of time and effort. The only thing it could have accomplished was to locate additional evidence for the Arubans to destroy.  The effort was superb, but the game was fixed.

http://scaredmonkeys.net/index.php?topic=2769.msg372245;topicseen#msg372245


private eye
Re: Natalee Case Discussion #742 3/10 -
« Reply #686 on: March 13, 2008, 06:38:07 PM »


But sharing information with people who work for people who are directly orchestrating the cover up, Rudy, or the Dutch, is the most irresponsible investigating I can imagine. What kills this investigation is people having to come into it, wanting to apply basic investigatory protocols into place, and then having those channels sabotage the new evidence that the new players discover. Of course, as is happened everytime in this case, the new people eventually come to a point where the manipulation of the evidence is undeniable, but by then the fruits of their work are gone, and there is simply another member of the believers of the cover up group. What I pray that Kyle and the crew of the Persistence will determine, is that  regardless of how hard working the man that they are working with appears to work, his work belongs to Rudy, and Rudy belongs to the local dutch.

We are not hysterical, ignorant, paranoid people. We have seen the cover up in action, in broad daylight, with impunity, and if you disregard our warnings, you will become the next chump in a series of chumps, no matter how sophisticated your equipment, the level of your educational achievement, or the extent of your job skills and work history.

http://scaredmonkeys.net/index.php?topic=2689.msg364750#msg364750

Does it seem odd to anyone besides me that there was a tennis shoe in the cage photo,
there was a tennis shoe on the front page of Dairo
there was a tennis shoe that CAPS said he lost in that pond when he was a kid (posted on SM someplace)
and
Caps said there was human remains and a tennis shoe in the pond



Yes


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #793 1/13/09
Post by: klaasend on January 17, 2009, 02:33:26 PM
Name: GEOLAB SILVETTI & COMPANY, L.L.C.
Prior Name: SILVETTI & COMPANY, L.L.C., J. D. ( 4/12/2000


GeoLab Group announced the appointment of Mr. C. J. Appleyard as General Manager for GeoLab LLC. Mr. Appleyard, formerly Survey Manager for Oceaneering and a Senior Consultant to BP's Deepwater Gulf of Mexico operations, will head up the Groups America's region following a reorganization in Q4, 2001. GeoLab will change the operational name from GeoLab Silvetti and Company LLC to GeoLab LLC forthwith with the corporate office in Houston, Texas and an operational base in Lafayette, Louisiana.

GeoLab LLC is a member of the GeoLab Group of Companies providing extensive experience in supporting a diverse range of specialist data-gathering, survey and seabed mapping services to support the marine construction, hydrocarbon, telecommunication, and maritime industries worldwide.  (hydrocarbon aka petrolium & natural gas)


The GeoLab group of companies operates through a network of strategically located companies to provide its customers with a global service. Experienced field proven professionals, whom in turn service the needs of their local customers, manage each entity. The Group represents the integrated capabilities of five GeoLab Companies; GeoLab Technical Services Ltd. (UK), GeoLab srl. (Italy), GeoLab bv (Netherlands), GeoLab LLC (USA) and GeoLab Technical Services Nigeria Ltd. (Nigeria).


The services provided by the company are subject to an ISO 9002 control process to ensure that the deliverable items satisfy the clients' requirements. The extent of services covered by the accreditation covers all supporting activities inclusive of Project and Operational Management compliance functions and is summarized within the scope of the ISO charter. Health, Safety, Environmental and Risk management are all components of the system, which dovetail into the Quality compliance process.


For information contact GeoLab LLC at +713-457 0411 or by e-mail at info@geolab.cc
http://www.e-pageads.com/survey-marketplace/newsletter/newsletter71.html


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #793 1/13/09
Post by: wreck on January 17, 2009, 02:33:43 PM
It is also odd that Diario made a big deal about a tennis shoe found by the lighthouse.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #793 1/13/09
Post by: Kermit on January 17, 2009, 02:34:26 PM
Kermit.How did Kyle come to going to Norway,as well as Egypt?How would he go about getting what would seem to be jobs that would be quite lucrative?

He went to John Silvetti's home over the 4th of July weekend.
Then he told us he was going to Norway.
A Dutch agent then offered him the Egypt deal. Kyle posted on his blog, he made so much money he was going to give some of it away to the poor people in Egypt.

I wonder why, now that you brought this up,  why didn't Kyle contribute some of his extra cash towards the return of the RV Persistence to Aruba to continue the search for Natalee, you know with that smaller boat they needed and were asking all of us for funds?

Kyle said more then once, John Silvetti is his boss.




Was Silvetti that well connected Globally as to secure such jobs or did they form relationships while in Aruba?

John S. distributes APS Sonavision sonars in the Gulf ,APS LLC focuses specifically on the navigation and sonar needs of the oil and gas industry.

Caps said that John told him at their meeting at Caps home: John state the cage was empty. it was full of these broken plastic bags that shows on the cam like skull

He thinks also it is a postoffice.


"Kyle said: June 29, 2008: I'm curious if the birds connects the dots and figures out what John will do before he knows what he's doing. Well, he's a pretty shrewd businessman and usually thinks at least three steps ahead. We'll see how this plays out. I'll be at his house in about 5-6 hours.

Kyle returned from John Silvetti's home and he went to the Norway job and then to the Egypt job, set up by the Dutch manager.







Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #793 1/13/09
Post by: Anna on January 17, 2009, 02:34:45 PM
And I resent it when people say we are all bashing/hanging Kyle.  I have been very careful not to say much in that regard.  I do think he should not have said all that IF it was not true.

And if it was, then why all the alarm and back-pedaling?  He must have known how big in oil the Dutch are.  Lots of the rigs off our own coast are Royal Dutch Petroleum, etc.

Saying he should not have created this controversy is not bashing, it is stating a fact.  He stirred it all up with his own words.

And he said several times there were human remains in that trap.  I realize they could be other than Natalee.  But now how will we ever know for a fact certain?  Allowing only ALE sole access has made that impossible as far as I can tell.

I just don't believe what they say after all the lies they have told about Natalee and what happened to her.  I further believe they did some switcheroo with the samples from Deepak's car.  So why should I believe they would not do the same in this instance? 

And more  importantly, why would Silvetti or anyone else think they would not?

I think they went for two weeks just as they said and SOMEONE contacted them about something else along the way causing them to stay in the area MUCH, MUCH longer.

Now we have Chavez and the Ruskies drilling just off the coast.  There are no coincidences.

Just saying. . . . .


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #793 1/13/09
Post by: Tamikosmom on January 17, 2009, 02:36:46 PM


Does it seem odd to anyone besides me that there was a tennis shoe in the cage photo,
there was a tennis shoe on the front page of Dairo

there was a tennis shoe that CAPS said he lost in that pond when he was a kid (posted on SM someplace)
and
Caps said there was human remains and a tennis shoe in the pond


Kermit ... the distraction agenda to take the focus off of the Persistence undertaking ... to tak the focus off of the trap/cage ... was alive and well.

Janet



Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #793 1/13/09
Post by: klaasend on January 17, 2009, 02:38:28 PM
oceanexploration
Full Member

Posts: 100



Re: The Search for Natalee Holloway Blogspot
« Reply #801 on: February 23, 2008, 04:37:18 PM »

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Dateline made many grievous mistakes in the broadcast. To name a few:

1) My biggest problem with it -- they failed to mention or include any interview from John Silvetti, the owner of the Persistence and field project manager of the search. He was just as influencial to the project as TM.

2) They included a statement by Dave H. which said we could find a quarter on the seafloor with our equipment. We do not have the ability to detect a quarter on the seafloor. To anyone in the industry, this is silly.

3) the trap was not found where Tim Miller guessed or had a feeling it would be.

4) the broadcast gave the impression that they knew the type of trap which was allegedly stolen from the fishermen's huts. They speculated on the missing trap using added file footage.

5) the broadcast was supposed to be a documentary on TES and Tim Miller, not the search for Natalee Holloway. It seems they used Tim Miller to get the scoop on the search.

TO KYLE from me:

If the broadcast was supposed to be a documentary on TES and Tim Miller (BS) then why would they even consider interviewing Silvetti?  That is your BIGGEST problem?


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #793 1/13/09
Post by: Kermit on January 17, 2009, 02:38:42 PM
IT APPEARS JOHN SILVETTI HAS A SECOND COMPANY ORIGINALLY KNOWN AS GEOLAB SILVETTI AND COMPANY LLC, BUT HE CHANGED THE NAME TO GEOLAB LLC IN 2001
(NOTE THIS COMPANY HAS THE SAME ADDRESS AS APS ABOVE) GEOLAB SILVETTI CO. 401 MECCA ST # B (337)-291-1120
http://www.looboo.com/list/US/LA/Lafayette/localinks

THIS SECOND COMPANY REPRESENTS THE INTEGRATED CAPABILITIES OF 5 GEOLAB COMPANIES
** NOTE THAT 1 OF THE 5 IS IN THE NETHERLANDS


will head up the Groups America's region following a reorganization in Q4, 2001. GeoLab will change the operational name from GeoLab Silvetti and Company LLC to GeoLab LLC forthwith with the corporate office in Houston, Texas and an operational base in Lafayette, Louisianasnip

The Group represents the integrated capabilities of five GeoLab Companies; GeoLab Technical Services Ltd. (UK), GeoLab srl. (Italy), GeoLab bv (Netherlands), GeoLab LLC (USA) and GeoLab Technical Services Nigeria Ltd. (Nigeria).

http://www.e-pageads.com/surveymarketplace/newsletter/newsletter71.html#2


GEOLAB B.V.(Netherlands)
Het Nieuwe Diep 39C
1781 AE Den Helder
NEDERLAND
t: +31 223684156
f: +31 223684160
w: Niet opgegeven
e: Niet opgegevenhttp://www.hotfrog.nl/Companies/GEOLAB-B-V


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #793 1/13/09
Post by: Keepthefaith on January 17, 2009, 02:39:53 PM


Does it seem odd to anyone besides me that there was a tennis shoe in the cage photo,
there was a tennis shoe on the front page of Dairo

there was a tennis shoe that CAPS said he lost in that pond when he was a kid (posted on SM someplace)
and
Caps said there was human remains and a tennis shoe in the pond


Kermit ... the distraction agenda to take the focus off of the Persistence undertaking ... to tak the focus off of the trap/cage ... was alive and well.

Janet



And who was apart of the disinformation?Caps,Eduardo,Jossy,Serge,Dolph,Clyde,Mos?Monkey's.

I'm also still intrigued with the Antonio Carlo,Paulus connection?Why go into practice with Carlo?Who owe's who in this relationship?


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #793 1/13/09
Post by: wreck on January 17, 2009, 02:41:51 PM
oceanexploration
Full Member

Posts: 100



Re: The Search for Natalee Holloway Blogspot
« Reply #801 on: February 23, 2008, 04:37:18 PM »

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Dateline made many grievous mistakes in the broadcast. To name a few:

1) My biggest problem with it -- they failed to mention or include any interview from John Silvetti, the owner of the Persistence and field project manager of the search. He was just as influencial to the project as TM.

2) They included a statement by Dave H. which said we could find a quarter on the seafloor with our equipment. We do not have the ability to detect a quarter on the seafloor. To anyone in the industry, this is silly.

3) the trap was not found where Tim Miller guessed or had a feeling it would be.

4) the broadcast gave the impression that they knew the type of trap which was allegedly stolen from the fishermen's huts. They speculated on the missing trap using added file footage.

5) the broadcast was supposed to be a documentary on TES and Tim Miller, not the search for Natalee Holloway. It seems they used Tim Miller to get the scoop on the search.

TO KYLE from me:

If the broadcast was supposed to be a documentary on TES and Tim Miller (BS) then why would they even consider interviewing Silvetti?  That is your BIGGEST problem?

Didn't he say later that the trap was right where they thought it would be??


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #793 1/13/09
Post by: Kermit on January 17, 2009, 02:42:11 PM
Feb. 22, 2008Kyle posted at BFN: This program was originally pitched by NBC to Tim Miller to be a docuentary about TES and turned into a documenary about the Search for Natalee Holloway's body.  It seems NBC shamelessly used Tim Miller to get on board the Persistence during the search


March 3 - LegalLEx posts at BFN: "I think an immediate agenda many of us have taken on is... to continue... trying to find significant funding/donations... to finish the search... at least of those 150 (or so) targets that may yield Natalee and... maybe... evidence.
<snip>
Since John does not deal with the financing portion, (TES and Louis do),


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #793 1/13/09
Post by: Anna on January 17, 2009, 02:43:24 PM
Does it seem odd to anyone besides me that there was a tennis shoe in the cage photo,
there was a tennis shoe on the front page of Dairo
there was a tennis shoe that CAPS said he lost in that pond when he was a kid (posted on SM someplace)
and
Caps said there was human remains and a tennis shoe in the pond




Oh, Kermit, it hurts my heart too much to think about that too much.  I will have to gradually peek at that a little at a time.  It's like I have my eyes closed yelling No! because I don't want it to be true.

 ::MonkeyWaa:: ::MonkeyWaa:: ::MonkeyWaa::

I can't explain it well but it's sort of like I can only deal with this one little step at a time and am avoiding thinking about that too closely.

But as I said, there are no coincidences.

.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #793 1/13/09
Post by: Anna on January 17, 2009, 02:47:36 PM
Just going over some old posts here and there...mostly there  ::MonkeyCool::

Marine Surveys, LLC split from its sister company,
APS, in 2006. Marine Surveys primary focus is
Construction Surveying and Geophysical Services.
Marine Surveys handles all projects, within the
Group, that require stamped certification by a
Professional Land Surveyor (PLS).

The Marine Surveys Project Management Team
is experienced in Construction Surveys from the
Shallowest of Waters to Thousands of Feet. Just as
important as the performance of the field operations,
the Team is very experienced in Project Planning by
working shoulder to shoulder with our customers
as well as developing detailed survey procedures

Marine Surveys provides the full range of
Geophysical Services, ranging from Shallow
Hazard P/L Pre- Route Surveys to searching for
“downed” aircraft. The R/V Persistence serves as
our flagship for Acquisition Services.

As a member of the JD Silvetti Group of Companies,
Marine Surveys supports the “Zero Tolerance”
downtime commitment through critical path
redundancy and the “Zero Tolerance” Policy
inherent in our HS&E Program. Safety through
Commitment

MANAGING MEMBER: JOHN D. SILVETTI
GENERAL MANAGER: CONRAD DAIGLE
OFFICE MANAGER: MARIANNE VOORHIES  
SALES & MARKETING MANAGER: TIM BOYER
SAFETY COORDINATOR: ROBERTA SILVETTI
IT/SOFTWARE DEVELOPMENT MANAGER: RICK PUTNAM
ACCOUNTS PAYABLE: RENEE PRUDHOME
FINANCE MANAGER: REBECCA MARCANTEL
EQUIPMENT LABORATORY MANAGER: AARON PRIEST
CHIEF GEOSCINTIST: Dr. ROB FLOYD
CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER: ERIC SWINNEY


http://silvettigroup.com/ms.html


Dutch name.  Not as Dutch as mine but Dutch nonetheless.

 ::MonkeyTongue::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #793 1/13/09
Post by: Tamikosmom on January 17, 2009, 02:49:49 PM
Youngest son and DIL just dropped in.  I do believe I will make a decent lunch.  Hubby is a happy camper.  Usually when he asks what is for lunch ... I tell him anything his little heart desires and ... continue posting.

 ::MonkeyHaHa::

Kermit ... thank you for sharing.

Ribbits and Ribbits

Janet
11:50 AM PT


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #793 1/13/09
Post by: Kermit on January 17, 2009, 02:51:26 PM
We are told this is from an email, and it explains what Jug said to someone else about John Silvetti and what Jug knew:


"I asked Jug about Schaeffer...he is the oil guy. He was the one that provided the cash to get down there. Silvetti knew he would get more business from Schaeffer if he mapped....while they were looking...the ocean floor. All the crew was asked to do was look for Natalee or anything suspicious as in small things like a cage or bones or whatever.
They do a large mapping process while they are looking for the details. Schaeffer would use the large mapping of the general layout of the ocean floor to further look for oil...etc...while they looked for Natalee too.

Silvetti was the one that offered to look for Natalee and not Schaefer


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #793 1/13/09
Post by: Kermit on January 17, 2009, 02:52:49 PM
Youngest son and DIL just dropped in.  I do believe I will make a decent lunch.  Hubby is a happy camper.  Usually when he asks what is for lunch ... I tell him anything his little heart desires and ... continue posting.

 ::MonkeyHaHa::

Kermit ... thank you for sharing.

Ribbits and Ribbits

Janet
11:50 AM PT

Enjoy time with family and lunch!
Come back you'll need to see my next post.
Thank you for all your posts, they DO help me greatly and I wanted to let you know I appreciate the way you dig up the quotes and put them together. It helps.



Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #793 1/13/09
Post by: Kermit on January 17, 2009, 02:54:14 PM
Does it seem odd to anyone besides me that there was a tennis shoe in the cage photo,
there was a tennis shoe on the front page of Dairo
there was a tennis shoe that CAPS said he lost in that pond when he was a kid (posted on SM someplace)
and
Caps said there was human remains and a tennis shoe in the pond




Oh, Kermit, it hurts my heart too much to think about that too much.  I will have to gradually peek at that a little at a time.  It's like I have my eyes closed yelling No! because I don't want it to be true.

 ::MonkeyWaa:: ::MonkeyWaa:: ::MonkeyWaa::

I can't explain it well but it's sort of like I can only deal with this one little step at a time and am avoiding thinking about that too closely.

But as I said, there are no coincidences.

.

I understand.
Believe me I do.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #793 1/13/09
Post by: Keepthefaith on January 17, 2009, 02:54:30 PM
Youngest son and DIL just dropped in.  I do believe I will make a decent lunch.  Hubby is a happy camper.  Usually when he asks what is for lunch ... I tell him anything his little heart desires and ... continue posting.

 ::MonkeyHaHa::

Kermit ... thank you for sharing.

Ribbits and Ribbits

Janet
11:50 AM PT

Logic dictates it's lunchtime! ::MonkeyLaugh:: TTYL Janet! ::MonkeyWink::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #793 1/13/09
Post by: Kermit on January 17, 2009, 02:57:40 PM


Does it seem odd to anyone besides me that there was a tennis shoe in the cage photo,
there was a tennis shoe on the front page of Dairo

there was a tennis shoe that CAPS said he lost in that pond when he was a kid (posted on SM someplace)
and
Caps said there was human remains and a tennis shoe in the pond


Kermit ... the distraction agenda to take the focus off of the Persistence undertaking ... to tak the focus off of the trap/cage ... was alive and well.

Janet



I agree.



Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #793 1/13/09
Post by: Anna on January 17, 2009, 02:58:08 PM
We are told this is from an email, and it explains what Jug said to someone else about John Silvetti and what Jug knew:


"I asked Jug about Schaeffer...he is the oil guy. He was the one that provided the cash to get down there. Silvetti knew he would get more business from Schaeffer if he mapped....while they were looking...the ocean floor. All the crew was asked to do was look for Natalee or anything suspicious as in small things like a cage or bones or whatever.
They do a large mapping process while they are looking for the details. Schaeffer would use the large mapping of the general layout of the ocean floor to further look for oil...etc...while they looked for Natalee too.

Silvetti was the one that offered to look for Natalee and not Schaefer

I would imagine a map could be used for any number of things once made.


Oduber says they need a natural gas line directly to Aruba from Venezuela, for example.

Once the map is made, it could be sold to any number of people for any number of reasons.  Oil would be one of those things.

And I even have no problem with that!  What I do have a problem with is the conflicting stories about what was in the trap and allowing ALE sole custody of the contents.  And why even state it was only to look for Natalee as it could have been billed as a twofold search without anyone objecting.  Of course, they couldn't have asked for donations but I seriously doubt they received enough in that regard to have made it worth the deceit, if any happened.  Again, not knowing is the rub.

What on earth were they thinking!  Then the pond business. . . .


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #793 1/13/09
Post by: texasmom on January 17, 2009, 02:58:56 PM
Just going over some old posts here and there...mostly there  ::MonkeyCool::

Marine Surveys, LLC split from its sister company,
APS, in 2006. Marine Surveys primary focus is
Construction Surveying and Geophysical Services.
Marine Surveys handles all projects, within the
Group, that require stamped certification by a
Professional Land Surveyor (PLS).

The Marine Surveys Project Management Team
is experienced in Construction Surveys from the
Shallowest of Waters to Thousands of Feet. Just as
important as the performance of the field operations,
the Team is very experienced in Project Planning by
working shoulder to shoulder with our customers
as well as developing detailed survey procedures

Marine Surveys provides the full range of
Geophysical Services, ranging from Shallow
Hazard P/L Pre- Route Surveys to searching for
“downed” aircraft. The R/V Persistence serves as
our flagship for Acquisition Services.

As a member of the JD Silvetti Group of Companies,
Marine Surveys supports the “Zero Tolerance”
downtime commitment through critical path
redundancy and the “Zero Tolerance” Policy
inherent in our HS&E Program. Safety through
Commitment

MANAGING MEMBER: JOHN D. SILVETTI
GENERAL MANAGER: CONRAD DAIGLE
OFFICE MANAGER: MARIANNE VOORHIES  
SALES & MARKETING MANAGER: TIM BOYER
SAFETY COORDINATOR: ROBERTA SILVETTI
IT/SOFTWARE DEVELOPMENT MANAGER: RICK PUTNAM
ACCOUNTS PAYABLE: RENEE PRUDHOME
FINANCE MANAGER: REBECCA MARCANTEL
EQUIPMENT LABORATORY MANAGER: AARON PRIEST
CHIEF GEOSCINTIST: Dr. ROB FLOYD
CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER: ERIC SWINNEY


http://silvettigroup.com/ms.html


Dutch name.  Not as Dutch as mine but Dutch nonetheless.

 ::MonkeyTongue::

I think that is one of Silvetti's daughters.  Married name?


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #793 1/13/09
Post by: Anna on January 17, 2009, 03:04:11 PM

I think that is one of Silvetti's daughters.  Married name?


 ::MonkeyShocked::

I wonder if she married someone from The Netherlands or just someone American Dutchie like me.  Maybe she met someone in the OIL business through work.  Does the plot thicken?

 ::MonkeyConfused::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #793 1/13/09
Post by: Kermit on January 17, 2009, 03:07:59 PM


Does it seem odd to anyone besides me that there was a tennis shoe in the cage photo,
there was a tennis shoe on the front page of Dairo

there was a tennis shoe that CAPS said he lost in that pond when he was a kid (posted on SM someplace)
and
Caps said there was human remains and a tennis shoe in the pond


Kermit ... the distraction agenda to take the focus off of the Persistence undertaking ... to tak the focus off of the trap/cage ... was alive and well.

Janet



And who was apart of the disinformation?Caps,Eduardo,Jossy,Serge,Dolph,Clyde,Mos?Monkey's.

I'm also still intrigued with the Antonio Carlo,Paulus connection?Why go into practice with Carlo?Who owe's who in this relationship?

How else would you protect money laundering, heroin....

Mark Purcell's wife, Marlene Purcell along with Antonio Carlos are involved in the AHATAboard as well.
Antonio Carlos worked for Johan Paul Sjiem Fat, Sjiem Fat & Sjiem Fat, Aruba

 Paulus Van der Sloot participated on a panel which agreed to extradite two relatives of the Mansurs to the US under serious charges some years back

Antonio Carlos worked for the gov't and banks in Aruba.







Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #793 1/13/09
Post by: wreck on January 17, 2009, 03:10:06 PM
We are told this is from an email, and it explains what Jug said to someone else about John Silvetti and what Jug knew:


"I asked Jug about Schaeffer...he is the oil guy. He was the one that provided the cash to get down there. Silvetti knew he would get more business from Schaeffer if he mapped....while they were looking...the ocean floor. All the crew was asked to do was look for Natalee or anything suspicious as in small things like a cage or bones or whatever.
They do a large mapping process while they are looking for the details. Schaeffer would use the large mapping of the general layout of the ocean floor to further look for oil...etc...while they looked for Natalee too.

Silvetti was the one that offered to look for Natalee and not Schaefer

Here is where our FBI and/or the I.R.S. could get involved --- "income tax evasion" or "fraud",  if they claimed this to be a "non-profit" venture.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #793 1/13/09
Post by: Kermit on January 17, 2009, 03:11:42 PM
We are told this is from an email, and it explains what Jug said to someone else about John Silvetti and what Jug knew:


"I asked Jug about Schaeffer...he is the oil guy. He was the one that provided the cash to get down there. Silvetti knew he would get more business from Schaeffer if he mapped....while they were looking...the ocean floor. All the crew was asked to do was look for Natalee or anything suspicious as in small things like a cage or bones or whatever.
They do a large mapping process while they are looking for the details. Schaeffer would use the large mapping of the general layout of the ocean floor to further look for oil...etc...while they looked for Natalee too.

Silvetti was the one that offered to look for Natalee and not Schaefer

I would imagine a map could be used for any number of things once made.


Oduber says they need a natural gas line directly to Aruba from Venezuela, for example.

Once the map is made, it could be sold to any number of people for any number of reasons.  Oil would be one of those things.

And I even have no problem with that!  What I do have a problem with is the conflicting stories about what was in the trap and allowing ALE sole custody of the contents.  And why even state it was only to look for Natalee as it could have been billed as a twofold search without anyone objecting.  Of course, they couldn't have asked for donations but I seriously doubt they received enough in that regard to have made it worth the deceit, if any happened.  Again, not knowing is the rub.

What on earth were they thinking!  Then the pond business. . . .


Sell the ROV/video images for MONEY
Sell the documentary for MONEY
Set up office in Aruba for South American business for MONEY

I might be wrong, but I think that is what their thinking was.



Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #793 1/13/09
Post by: Kermit on January 17, 2009, 03:13:32 PM
We are told this is from an email, and it explains what Jug said to someone else about John Silvetti and what Jug knew:


"I asked Jug about Schaeffer...he is the oil guy. He was the one that provided the cash to get down there. Silvetti knew he would get more business from Schaeffer if he mapped....while they were looking...the ocean floor. All the crew was asked to do was look for Natalee or anything suspicious as in small things like a cage or bones or whatever.
They do a large mapping process while they are looking for the details. Schaeffer would use the large mapping of the general layout of the ocean floor to further look for oil...etc...while they looked for Natalee too.

Silvetti was the one that offered to look for Natalee and not Schaefer

Here is where our FBI and/or the I.R.S. could get involved --- "income tax evasion" or "fraud",  if they claimed this to be a "non-profit" venture.


Tax evasion
Federal Securities fraud
Obstruction of Justice in a criminal case



Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #793 1/13/09
Post by: Kermit on January 17, 2009, 03:14:09 PM
Off to the pond.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #793 1/13/09
Post by: texasmom on January 17, 2009, 03:14:39 PM

I think that is one of Silvetti's daughters.  Married name?


 ::MonkeyShocked::

I wonder if she married someone from The Netherlands or just someone American Dutchie like me.  Maybe she met someone in the OIL business through work.  Does the plot thicken?

 ::MonkeyConfused::

My opinion only from what I can gather...American Dutchie.  Subject to change depending on further investigation.   ::MonkeyWink::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #793 1/13/09
Post by: Keepthefaith on January 17, 2009, 03:16:29 PM
Off to the pond.


Thanx Kermit.Be careful in the pond! ::MonkeyCool::

KEEPTHEFAITH


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #793 1/13/09
Post by: Keepthefaith on January 17, 2009, 03:18:17 PM
Stepping out for a bit!Till then.Have a good day Monkey's.hotping, Magnolia, Anna, Frijole, texasmom, wreck, 2NJSons_Mom, Blue Moon, San, Mere

JUSTICE FOR NATALEE ::MonkeyCool::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #793 1/13/09
Post by: hotping on January 17, 2009, 03:19:12 PM
We are told this is from an email, and it explains what Jug said to someone else about John Silvetti and what Jug knew:


"I asked Jug about Schaeffer...he is the oil guy. He was the one that provided the cash to get down there. Silvetti knew he would get more business from Schaeffer if he mapped....while they were looking...the ocean floor. All the crew was asked to do was look for Natalee or anything suspicious as in small things like a cage or bones or whatever.
They do a large mapping process while they are looking for the details. Schaeffer would use the large mapping of the general layout of the ocean floor to further look for oil...etc...while they looked for Natalee too.

Silvetti was the one that offered to look for Natalee and not Schaefer

Here is where our FBI and/or the I.R.S. could get involved --- "income tax evasion" or "fraud",  if they claimed this to be a "non-profit" venture.


Tax evasion
Federal Securities fraud
Obstruction of Justice in a criminal case


Thank You Kermit...... ::MonkeyWink::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #793 1/13/09
Post by: Blue Moon on January 17, 2009, 03:19:22 PM
We are told this is from an email, and it explains what Jug said to someone else about John Silvetti and what Jug knew:


"I asked Jug about Schaeffer...he is the oil guy. He was the one that provided the cash to get down there. Silvetti knew he would get more business from Schaeffer if he mapped....while they were looking...the ocean floor. All the crew was asked to do was look for Natalee or anything suspicious as in small things like a cage or bones or whatever.
They do a large mapping process while they are looking for the details. Schaeffer would use the large mapping of the general layout of the ocean floor to further look for oil...etc...while they looked for Natalee too.

Silvetti was the one that offered to look for Natalee and not Schaefer

Here is where our FBI and/or the I.R.S. could get involved --- "income tax evasion" or "fraud",  if they claimed this to be a "non-profit" venture.


Tax evasion
Federal Securities fraud
Obstruction of Justice in a criminal case



If I am correct they have already faced Federal Securities fraud.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #793 1/13/09
Post by: wreck on January 17, 2009, 03:20:48 PM
Most encouraging thing today:

Quote
"I will tell you much more when the time is right"
[/color]


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #793 1/13/09
Post by: hotping on January 17, 2009, 03:21:57 PM
Most encouraging thing today:

Quote
"I will tell you much more when the time is right"
[/color]
Agreed!  ::MonkeyCool::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #793 1/13/09
Post by: hotping on January 17, 2009, 03:23:27 PM
See Ya Later Monkeys! Its been a Very Interesting Day in the Cage....  ::MonkeyTongue::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #793 1/13/09
Post by: Blue Moon on January 17, 2009, 03:25:01 PM
Anyone who challenges Kermit should know by now she can back up anything she says.  Each time they challenge her we get a little more information.  Keep it up naysayers, the truth will ALL be told before this is over. That goes for Aruba also.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #793 1/13/09
Post by: texasmom on January 17, 2009, 03:25:19 PM
See Ya Later Monkeys! Its been a Very Interesting Day in the Cage....  ::MonkeyTongue::

Later Hotping!  Have a great day!

Yes, another interesting day in the cage!

  ::MonkeyCool::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #793 1/13/09
Post by: Kermit on January 17, 2009, 03:34:00 PM
I have a question for everyone to ponder.  We all know how Beth, Dave, Jug and others in the family were very vocal when Natalee went missing.  Very much into searching for her and ready to expose what they went through in Aruba and the mess that was going on.  Here is the question.  Do you think that if there was any chance that Natalee was in that trap that the family would be so quiet?  We have heard nothing from the family.  I personally think that in all this turmoil about the crab trap I would take my cues from the family.  They do know more than us and yes they do know more than Kermit.


WHAT WAS JOHN SILVETTI REALLY AFTER?

jdsurveyor1 Newbie Posts: 11
John Silvetti, the Persistence and the Search for Natalee «
Reply #13 on: April 03, 2008, 07:52:13 PM »

The important thing is to raise funds. It will require corporate support as well as private donations. Dave and Beth have been doing a great job getting the word out and while I was on the island, Dave put me in contact with the head of the Hotel Association who is working on raising a sizeable amount. So many on the island are supporting our efforts as well as people from all over the world. The media really blew the cage out of proportion. Although the cage initially provided some moments of "what is in there", I warned all on board that none of this information was to leave the boat. It was very suspect that a cage of this size was found where it was on the seafloor relative to the coast. My feelings were this was highly unusual and probably had something to do with something, but not what we were after.  It was decided that the cage would be investigated further by divers, however, it was designated as only a target of interest. The crew moved onto other targets. Unfortunately, inexperience and frustration led to premature statements, including that we had found herI don't think anyone was more upset than I that this information came off the boat and caused the Holloway family more grief!
http://scaredmonkeys.net/index.php?topic=4371.msg625934#msg625934

Kyle:After John verbally BASHED me about the trap for what I said to Tim Miller about the sand body-form and that I believed her skirt was under the sand, John pretty much committed himself to the belief the trap wasn't what we were after. This shocked me because it was exactly what we were looking for- a fish trap lost at sea with human remains


I asked Jug about Schaeffer...he is the oil guy. He was the one that provided the cash to get down there. Silvetti knew he would get more business from Schaeffer if he mapped....while they were looking...the ocean floor. All the crew was asked to do was look for Natalee or anything suspicious as in small things like a cage or bones or whatever.
They do a large mapping process while they are looking for the details. Schaeffer would use the large mapping of the general layout of the ocean floor to further look for oil[/u]...etc...while they looked for Natalee too.
Silvetti was the one that offered to look for Natalee and not Schaefer


Kyle said: June 29, 2008: I'm curious if the birds connects the dots and figures out what John will do before he knows what he's doing. Well, he's a pretty shrewd businessman and usually thinks at least three steps ahead. We'll see how this plays out. I'll be at his house in about 5-6 hours.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #793 1/13/09
Post by: Kermit on January 17, 2009, 03:35:37 PM
Anyone who challenges Kermit should know by now she can back up anything she says.  Each time they challenge her we get a little more information.  Keep it up naysayers, the truth will ALL be told before this is over. That goes for Aruba also.

You are right.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #793 1/13/09
Post by: Kermit on January 17, 2009, 03:36:27 PM
We are told this is from an email, and it explains what Jug said to someone else about John Silvetti and what Jug knew:


"I asked Jug about Schaeffer...he is the oil guy. He was the one that provided the cash to get down there. Silvetti knew he would get more business from Schaeffer if he mapped....while they were looking...the ocean floor. All the crew was asked to do was look for Natalee or anything suspicious as in small things like a cage or bones or whatever.
They do a large mapping process while they are looking for the details. Schaeffer would use the large mapping of the general layout of the ocean floor to further look for oil...etc...while they looked for Natalee too.

Silvetti was the one that offered to look for Natalee and not Schaefer

Here is where our FBI and/or the I.R.S. could get involved --- "income tax evasion" or "fraud",  if they claimed this to be a "non-profit" venture.


Tax evasion
Federal Securities fraud
Obstruction of Justice in a criminal case



If I am correct they have already faced Federal Securities fraud.

There is an investigation and a civil suit against Schafer and his company/directors etc.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #793 1/13/09
Post by: Kermit on January 17, 2009, 03:36:56 PM
We are told this is from an email, and it explains what Jug said to someone else about John Silvetti and what Jug knew:


"I asked Jug about Schaeffer...he is the oil guy. He was the one that provided the cash to get down there. Silvetti knew he would get more business from Schaeffer if he mapped....while they were looking...the ocean floor. All the crew was asked to do was look for Natalee or anything suspicious as in small things like a cage or bones or whatever.
They do a large mapping process while they are looking for the details. Schaeffer would use the large mapping of the general layout of the ocean floor to further look for oil...etc...while they looked for Natalee too.

Silvetti was the one that offered to look for Natalee and not Schaefer

Here is where our FBI and/or the I.R.S. could get involved --- "income tax evasion" or "fraud",  if they claimed this to be a "non-profit" venture.


Tax evasion
Federal Securities fraud
Obstruction of Justice in a criminal case


Thank You Kermit...... ::MonkeyWink::

Have a good one hotping.



Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #793 1/13/09
Post by: Kermit on January 17, 2009, 03:38:14 PM
Off to the pond.


Thanx Kermit.Be careful in the pond! ::MonkeyCool::

KEEPTHEFAITH

Take care with all the bad weather you've had to endure - you need a little sunshine!



Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #793 1/13/09
Post by: sharon on January 17, 2009, 03:39:33 PM

{snipped}

KYLE KINGMAN - IN HIS OWN WORDS

oceanexploration
Re: Natalee Case Discussion #715 1/25 -
« Reply #103 on: January 26, 2008, 12:38:25 PM »


Thought you all may find this interesting if you're willing to accept it-

To date, the Aruban police and dive team has been a tremendous help. They've honestly done a great job. Over the last month we've established a very good working relationship based on openness and trust. Most of the relationship success was due to getting the media out of the way and working together shoulder to shoulder over time. We've helped each other however and whenever we can. They've treated us with decency and respect and we have treated them as friends and allies, which they are. Most of the police and divers are new since this case started and both eager and careful to do things right. I wish we had a month ahead of the project just to establish the relationships and trust. I know many of you would likely doubt this view, but it's based on the experiences in the field of the entire search team. I too was extremely worried, paranoid, and suspecting in the beginning. Now, it's clear we're all working towards a common goal.

http://scaredmonkeys.net/index.php?topic=2539.msg332457;topicseen#msg332457


PRIVATE EYE - IN HIS OWN WORDS

private eye
Re: Natalee Case Discussion #746 4/4
« Reply #499 on: April 09, 2008, 12:39:50 AM »


If I understood Kyle correctly, and that would be that the Arubans retrieved and possessed all finds, not sharing anything with the crew, then that effort was a waste of time and effort.  The only thing it could have accomplished was to locate additional evidence for the Arubans to destroy.  The effort was superb, but the game was fixed.

http://scaredmonkeys.net/index.php?topic=2769.msg372245;topicseen#msg372245


private eye
Re: Natalee Case Discussion #742 3/10 -
« Reply #686 on: March 13, 2008, 06:38:07 PM »


But sharing information with people who work for people who are directly orchestrating the cover up, Rudy, or the Dutch, is the most irresponsible investigating I can imagine. What kills this investigation is people having to come into it, wanting to apply basic investigatory protocols into place, and then having those channels sabotage the new evidence that the new players discover. Of course, as is happened everytime in this case, the new people eventually come to a point where the manipulation of the evidence is undeniable, but by then the fruits of their work are gone, and there is simply another member of the believers of the cover up group. What I pray that Kyle and the crew of the Persistence will determine, is that  regardless of how hard working the man that they are working with appears to work, his work belongs to Rudy, and Rudy belongs to the local dutch.

We are not hysterical, ignorant, paranoid people. We have seen the cover up in action, in broad daylight, with impunity, and if you disregard our warnings, you will become the next chump in a series of chumps, no matter how sophisticated your equipment, the level of your educational achievement, or the extent of your job skills and work history.

http://scaredmonkeys.net/index.php?topic=2689.msg364750#msg364750

Janet

Thanks so much for continuing to bring these 3 critical posts forward.

And I hope you continue to.

Especially when we get told that this is not how the family feels.  ::MonkeyNoNo::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #793 1/13/09
Post by: sharon on January 17, 2009, 03:40:42 PM
ribbit froggie  ::MonkeyCool::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #793 1/13/09
Post by: Blue Moon on January 17, 2009, 03:49:47 PM
Anyone who challenges Kermit should know by now she can back up anything she says.  Each time they challenge her we get a little more information.  Keep it up naysayers, the truth will ALL be told before this is over. That goes for Aruba also.

You are right.

Kermit, can you try to answer this question?  Jug was asked about Schaeffer, right?  If I understood Lou correctly Jug 100% defends Schaffer and says Beth doesn't know anything about any of this.  Who put Schaffer in touch with the family for this search?  Jug maybe?


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #793 1/13/09
Post by: wreck on January 17, 2009, 03:57:34 PM
You have to ask just how much Jug is clued-in by Beth -- they ARE divorced. I have liked Jug -- but you gotta ask!


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #793 1/13/09
Post by: sharon on January 17, 2009, 03:59:37 PM
You have to ask just how much Jug is clued-in by Beth -- they ARE divorced. I have liked Jug -- but you gotta ask!

lol

I tried that once.  ::MonkeyRoll::

My advice -- DON'T go there  ::MonkeyLaugh::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #793 1/13/09
Post by: Blue Moon on January 17, 2009, 04:03:06 PM
You have to ask just how much Jug is clued-in by Beth -- they ARE divorced. I have liked Jug -- but you gotta ask!

lol

I tried that once.  ::MonkeyRoll::

My advice -- DON'T go there  ::MonkeyLaugh::

Sharon, do you know who put Schaffer in touch with the family?


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #793 1/13/09
Post by: iris44 on January 17, 2009, 04:09:02 PM
HERE IS MY QUESTION.  WHY ARE PEOPLE SO BENT ON DISCREDITING KERMIT.  WHERE IS THE PROOF THAT PEOPLE ARE SAYING KERMIT IS LYING.

POST THE DAMN PROOF.

I DON'T WANT TO HERE WELL I TALKED TO THIS PERSON AND THEY SAID THIS.  TELL THE PERSON TO POST JUST LIKE KERMIT POSTS AND BACKS UP WHAT SHE POSTS.

Speaking only for myself, this is not an attempt to discredit Kermit.  In my posts, I am merely pointing out the fact that everything I have read says that Kermit and the Freebirds based their theory ONLY on Kyle's words and pictures, none of which have proven Natalee was in the cage.  I personally don't believe Kyle, so I cannot believe the Persistence conspiracy theory.   I do believe that Kyle told Kermit and others what Kermit has reported.  My question is: what makes Kyle so credible?  And why do some of you jump to the conclusion that a different opinion is an attempt to discredit other monkeys?   Can't someone have a differing opinion without trying to discredit others?  Or be a mole?

On a lighter note, I love the new "pirate" thing.  I'm hoping to see some new pics of the Persistence crew in their pirate gear.  Picturing Captain Sparrow.

It's OK if you don't believe Kyle.  But why was Kyle so mad when information came out about the fabric and what was in that cage.  Why couldn't he prove that it was not the truth.  He posted the words for everyone to read.  People came to the conclusion that he was lying and they compared his words from SM to Freebirds.  Kermit gave Kyle the opportunity and Kyle ran away.

Some people that posted here on SM are trying to discredit Kermit.  What do they base their opinion on that they feel Kermit is lying.  Kemit has posted Kyle's own words.  Is it because it is the truth and he cannot prove that Kermit might be lying.  Pictures don't lie.  We have seen the bags in the cage because they were Kyles.  Some of these same people had access to the same words that Kermit has posted.  Why can't they prove that Kermit is lying.  But they all come on here trying to bash Kermit.  PROVE IT.

Some people believe in CapsLockWizard I don't.  I am not bashing the man I just have no faith in what he is saying.  I am not putting my faith in a man who decided to join SM right before the Persistence made their trip to Aruba.   He decided he was going to solve a riddle.  If he feels that he did then good for him.

Something happened here and we are trying to get to the truth.

Who is telling the truth.  Is Kyle telling the truth of Kermit telling the truth.  That's what is boils down to.

Kyle was a professional who had a job to do.  A professional who was suppose to be dedicating his time into searching for Natalee Holloway's remains.  This is a man who had a wife and child and even named his child after Natalee if I recall correctly.

Why was Kyle so upset about what Private Eye posted that he asked to speak to him in private.  Was he upset because he knew that he didn't give that information out and it got leaked.  Was he upset because he knew it was the truth and the truth wasn't suppose to come out.

The truth seems to stir a lot of emotions whether good or bad.

One more note.  I have never seen Kermit be disrespectful towards any poster.

I will say this one last time.  I think Kyle is trying to pull off a SCAM to make money.  I personally do not see Natalee's remains or a shoe in the trap photos.  Does someone have proof that I have not seen that these are Natalee's or (anyone's) remains?  (Besides Kyle's words).  Most posters completely disregarded posters who said the "skull" was too small to be a skull.  If Kermit cracks the case I'll be thrilled for the family, but I haven't seen anything that looks like proof to me yet.  I'm sure they are doing things behind the scenes and that's great.  I can only base my opinion on what I see. 

Regarding Caps, he actually brought forward a witness that passed polygraphs.  I know you have all discounted this witness.  I guess you have your reasons for believing Kermit without any evidence, but not believing Caps.  If your intention was to make the Natalee site feel unwelcome for posters who question the group consensus, you have suceeded.  Good luck to you all.  I'm not wasting any more time here.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #793 1/13/09
Post by: sharon on January 17, 2009, 04:09:59 PM
You have to ask just how much Jug is clued-in by Beth -- they ARE divorced. I have liked Jug -- but you gotta ask!

lol

I tried that once.  ::MonkeyRoll::

My advice -- DON'T go there  ::MonkeyLaugh::

Sharon, do you know who put Schaffer in touch with the family?

No Blue Moon.

But I sure wish I did.

If there is an AHATA or ATA or 'Friends of Aruba' connection, I fear my heart will break. :-(


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #793 1/13/09
Post by: sharon on January 17, 2009, 04:11:47 PM

{snipped}

KYLE KINGMAN - IN HIS OWN WORDS

oceanexploration
Re: Natalee Case Discussion #715 1/25 -
« Reply #103 on: January 26, 2008, 12:38:25 PM »


Thought you all may find this interesting if you're willing to accept it-

To date, the Aruban police and dive team has been a tremendous help. They've honestly done a great job. Over the last month we've established a very good working relationship based on openness and trust. Most of the relationship success was due to getting the media out of the way and working together shoulder to shoulder over time. We've helped each other however and whenever we can. They've treated us with decency and respect and we have treated them as friends and allies, which they are. Most of the police and divers are new since this case started and both eager and careful to do things right. I wish we had a month ahead of the project just to establish the relationships and trust. I know many of you would likely doubt this view, but it's based on the experiences in the field of the entire search team. I too was extremely worried, paranoid, and suspecting in the beginning. Now, it's clear we're all working towards a common goal.

http://scaredmonkeys.net/index.php?topic=2539.msg332457;topicseen#msg332457


PRIVATE EYE - IN HIS OWN WORDS

private eye
Re: Natalee Case Discussion #746 4/4
« Reply #499 on: April 09, 2008, 12:39:50 AM »


If I understood Kyle correctly, and that would be that the Arubans retrieved and possessed all finds, not sharing anything with the crew, then that effort was a waste of time and effort.  The only thing it could have accomplished was to locate additional evidence for the Arubans to destroy.  The effort was superb, but the game was fixed.

http://scaredmonkeys.net/index.php?topic=2769.msg372245;topicseen#msg372245


private eye
Re: Natalee Case Discussion #742 3/10 -
« Reply #686 on: March 13, 2008, 06:38:07 PM »


But sharing information with people who work for people who are directly orchestrating the cover up, Rudy, or the Dutch, is the most irresponsible investigating I can imagine. What kills this investigation is people having to come into it, wanting to apply basic investigatory protocols into place, and then having those channels sabotage the new evidence that the new players discover. Of course, as is happened everytime in this case, the new people eventually come to a point where the manipulation of the evidence is undeniable, but by then the fruits of their work are gone, and there is simply another member of the believers of the cover up group. What I pray that Kyle and the crew of the Persistence will determine, is that  regardless of how hard working the man that they are working with appears to work, his work belongs to Rudy, and Rudy belongs to the local dutch.

We are not hysterical, ignorant, paranoid people. We have seen the cover up in action, in broad daylight, with impunity, and if you disregard our warnings, you will become the next chump in a series of chumps, no matter how sophisticated your equipment, the level of your educational achievement, or the extent of your job skills and work history.

http://scaredmonkeys.net/index.php?topic=2689.msg364750#msg364750

Janet

Thanks so much for continuing to bring these 3 critical posts forward.

And I hope you continue to.

Especially when we get told that this is not how the family feels.  ::MonkeyNoNo::

bump


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #793 1/13/09
Post by: Tamikosmom on January 17, 2009, 04:14:30 PM
We are told this is from an email, and it explains what Jug said to someone else about John Silvetti and what Jug knew:


"I asked Jug about Schaeffer...he is the oil guy. He was the one that provided the cash to get down there. Silvetti knew he would get more business from Schaeffer if he mapped....while they were looking...the ocean floor. All the crew was asked to do was look for Natalee or anything suspicious as in small things like a cage or bones or whatever.
They do a large mapping process while they are looking for the details. Schaeffer would use the large mapping of the general layout of the ocean floor to further look for oil...etc...while they looked for Natalee too.

Silvetti was the one that offered to look for Natalee and not Schaefer


Kermit ... who is "I".

I do not have a problem with a venture that is two-fold.  However ... I have a problem that TES was not upfront regarding this dual venture when donations were requested.  At all times the impression was given the the Persistence undertaking was all about searching for Natalee Holloway's remains.

The following words of Tim Miller implies that Louis S. was in on the Natalee Holloway aspect of the venture.  John S. may have initiated it but ... Louis S. was aware.

Janet

++++++

FOX ONLINE - JAMIE COLBY
July 15, 2007


COLBY:  Tim, why are they (Arubans) standing in your way?

MILLER: I don't think they can stand in our way. With the equipment we got and if we have to go in off of Venezuela. Whereever we need to go into, we've got the equipment. In fact they are more than welcome to be on the ship with us. The ships that we are taking over are a 265 foot ship and a 340 foot ship which have all the latest technology on it. In fact the owner of this company, Louis Shaeffer of Superior Offshore International, Louis called Dave Holloway up about two months ago when I was at Louis' house. He said "Mr Holloway, I'm going to promise you something, if your daughter is in a metal container out there in that water, we are going to bring her home."




Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #793 1/13/09
Post by: iris44 on January 17, 2009, 04:22:10 PM
KYLE KINGMAN - IN HIS OWN WORDS MIND

Sorry, I couldn't resist.  Everytime I read that heading in Janet's posts I mentally picture it changed into that.  Everytime I read Kyle's "own words" I believe them less and less.

Disclaimer: This was not an attempt to discredit Kermit.
Disclaimer: This was not an attempt to upset Janet.  She seems like a great person.
Disclaimer: This poster is not associated with anyone.
Disclaimer: This is not an attempt to get KTF to tell Janet how logical she is.

And you actually call other posters 'snarky'

 ::MonkeyNoNo::

I agree.  This was an attempt at all of the above.  But as I sit here and post am I bashing iris.  Iris disagrees with the people that I agree with.

I apologize if I offended anyone.  The disclaimers were my feeble attempt at humor.  I will no longer be bothering any of you by my postings.  I guess you all know what is going on and I don't, so best wishes and I hope all your Persistance conspiracy theory pans out.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #793 1/13/09
Post by: Anna on January 17, 2009, 04:23:38 PM
O/T

Elderly couple disappear from cruise ship

http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/28704127/?ocid=MSNToolbar130

It has become a matter of taking your life in your own hands to even go on a cruise any more.  I have done so in the past but would be afraid to now.  Too many strange things happen.  People get on but the don't get off.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #793 1/13/09
Post by: Anna on January 17, 2009, 04:29:59 PM
There is nothing to "pan out" with anything that I personally have commented on.

It is a fact that ALE and only ALE had access to the contents of the trap, at least legally. 

No conspiracy theory to it as all seem in agreement that only ALE took samples, diving from and returning to their own boat.



Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #793 1/13/09
Post by: Anna on January 17, 2009, 04:33:49 PM
Even Hans Mos said the samples were retrieved by polis divers.

That is a fact as all involved say this was the case.

ALE has had a history in this investigation of causing evidence to disappear or totally disregarding it.

Where is the conspiracy?


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #793 1/13/09
Post by: Blue Moon on January 17, 2009, 04:36:51 PM
Even Hans Mos said the samples were retrieved by polis divers.

That is a fact as all involved say this was the case.

ALE has had a history in this investigation of causing evidence to disappear or totally disregarding it.

Where is the conspiracy?

My point also Anna.  NOT a conspiracy, but very likely CRIMINAL what took place on that ship no matter whose remains were in the cage.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #793 1/13/09
Post by: iris44 on January 17, 2009, 05:16:20 PM
KYLE KINGMAN - IN HIS OWN WORDS MIND

Sorry, I couldn't resist.  Everytime I read that heading in Janet's posts I mentally picture it changed into that.  Everytime I read Kyle's "own words" I believe them less and less.

Disclaimer: This was not an attempt to discredit Kermit.
Disclaimer: This was not an attempt to upset Janet.  She seems like a great person.
Disclaimer: This poster is not associated with anyone.
Disclaimer: This is not an attempt to get KTF to tell Janet how logical she is.


Good Morning Iris.

Hey ... you have never answered my question.  Do you have any personal connection to John Silvetti ... direct or indirect?

Thanks Iris.

Casa has conceded that she does have an indirect connection and ... that indirect connection has convinced her that John Silvetti's motives in regard to the Persistence undertaking are above reproach..

Janet

+++++++


casa
Re: Natalee Case Discussion #777 11/21/08 thru
« Reply #238 on: November 22, 2008, 02:30:48 AM »


Ok Im going to say this one time and I will be done.  There is someone very close to my family who knows John Silvetti and knew him way before Natalee went missing.  This man is a class act.  He went into this to find Natalee and help her family.  He is in NO way a part of a coverup! It is an insult to this man to even suggest that he is a part of a cover up.  You who beliive this should be ashamed.   You all can choose to believe what you want and you can choose to blindly follow anyone you want but it does not change the FACTS.  I am just sorry that people choose to follow someone who does not even know this man and who in my opinion says things to draw attention to himself.  Sadly theer have been way too many people who have claimed to know stuff who don't have a clue!

http://scaredmonkeys.net/index.php?topic=4159.msg553060#msg553060


Hi Janet,

I have no connection to Silvetti or anyone else associated with Natalee's disappearance.  I am a CPA and Certified Fraud Examiner, but not a detective, LE or anything.  The fraud examinations I do are financial, but I have become fairly adept at noticing when something is not quite right, or at it appears to be.  I have also come across a fair amount of people who lie to further their own agendas. It seems that my skill set is not appreciated nor welcome at SM, so off I go. Take care.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #793 1/13/09
Post by: Tamikosmom on January 17, 2009, 05:19:25 PM
1.  At no time did Kyle Kingman in his postings on forums or his blog ... imply that the Persistence undertaking was anything but a search for Natalee Holloway's remains.

2.  At no time did Tim Miller in talk show interviews ever give the impression that the Persistence undertaking was anything but a search for Natalee Holloway's remains.

3.  At no time did Louis Schafer in talk show interviews ever give the impression that the Persistence undertaking was anything but a search for Natalee Holloway's remains.

3.  At no Time did Tim Trahan in talk show interviews ever give the impression that the Persistence undertaking was anything but a search for Natalee Holloway's remains.

If the words Jug Twitty words reveal the truth ... the implication is that there needs to be an official investigation by the "powers that be" in the United States regarding the outreach for donations to fund the Persistence undertaking.  If an oil mapping venture were to only include a "lookout" for something suspcious that could be Natalee Holloway related ... donors should have been made aware.

Considering the names "Tim Miller" and "TES" gave credibility to the donation outreach ... I do believe that Tim Miller's trusting nature and good reputation was taken advantage of.  In other words ... I am beginning to suspect Tim and his organization were used as a means to collect funds to finance an oil mapping venture.

 ::MonkeyNoNo::

Janet

++++++


Kermit
Re: Natalee Case Discussion #793 1/13/09
« Reply #604 on: Today at 05:51:26 PM »


We are told this is from an email, and it explains what Jug said to someone else about John Silvetti and what Jug knew:

"I asked Jug about Schaeffer ... he is the oil guy. He was the one that provided the cash to get down there. Silvetti knew he would get more business from Schaeffer if he mapped .... while they were looking ... the ocean floor. All the crew was asked to do was look for Natalee or anything suspicious as in small things like a cage or bones or whatever.  They do a large mapping process while they are looking for the details. Schaeffer would use the large mapping of the general layout of the ocean floor to further look for oil...etc...while they looked for Natalee too.

Silvetti was the one that offered to look for Natalee and not Schaefer.

http://scaredmonkeys.net/index.php?topic=4371.msg631525#msg631525


KYLE KINGMAN - IN HIS OWN WORDS.

Kyle said: June 29, 2008: I'm curious if the birds connects the dots and figures out what John will do before he knows what he's doing. Well, he's a pretty shrewd businessman and usually thinks at least three steps ahead. We'll see how this plays out. I'll be at his house in about 5-6 hours.




Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #793 1/13/09
Post by: johan555 on January 17, 2009, 05:26:38 PM
Good Morning/Afternoon Kermit! Have Ya got any uplifting News or Tidbits that You can share with Us? PLease....give Us something to lift Our spirits in regards to the case.....that is if You can...... ::MonkeyWink::

Hello Hotping,

When the time is right I will.




Thank You......Just those seven little words....are encouraging!  ::MonkeyCool:: 

Beth KNOWS what I have been working on.
And I know exactly what Beth wants.

Everyone who wants to doubt or believe whatever someone else is telling them are free to do so.

Those individuals who want to call me names, be insidious will continue to do so, but it won't stop
the good people from bringing the truth out and expose the Aruba cover-up.
I believe the monkeys stand together!





Do you have contact with Peter rd Vries Kermit ?


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #793 1/13/09
Post by: Tamikosmom on January 17, 2009, 05:31:29 PM
KYLE KINGMAN - IN HIS OWN WORDS MIND

Sorry, I couldn't resist.  Everytime I read that heading in Janet's posts I mentally picture it changed into that.  Everytime I read Kyle's "own words" I believe them less and less.

Disclaimer: This was not an attempt to discredit Kermit.
Disclaimer: This was not an attempt to upset Janet.  She seems like a great person.
Disclaimer: This poster is not associated with anyone.
Disclaimer: This is not an attempt to get KTF to tell Janet how logical she is.


Good Morning Iris.

Hey ... you have never answered my question.  Do you have any personal connection to John Silvetti ... direct or indirect?

Thanks Iris.

Casa has conceded that she does have an indirect connection and ... that indirect connection has convinced her that John Silvetti's motives in regard to the Persistence undertaking are above reproach..

Janet

+++++++


casa
Re: Natalee Case Discussion #777 11/21/08 thru
« Reply #238 on: November 22, 2008, 02:30:48 AM »


Ok Im going to say this one time and I will be done.  There is someone very close to my family who knows John Silvetti and knew him way before Natalee went missing.  This man is a class act.  He went into this to find Natalee and help her family.  He is in NO way a part of a coverup! It is an insult to this man to even suggest that he is a part of a cover up.  You who beliive this should be ashamed.   You all can choose to believe what you want and you can choose to blindly follow anyone you want but it does not change the FACTS.  I am just sorry that people choose to follow someone who does not even know this man and who in my opinion says things to draw attention to himself.  Sadly theer have been way too many people who have claimed to know stuff who don't have a clue!

http://scaredmonkeys.net/index.php?topic=4159.msg553060#msg553060


Hi Janet,

I have no connection to Silvetti or anyone else associated with Natalee's disappearance.  I am a CPA and Certified Fraud Examiner, but not a detective, LE or anything.  The fraud examinations I do are financial, but I have become fairly adept at noticing when something is not quite right, or at it appears to be.  I have also come across a fair amount of people who lie to further their own agendas. It seems that my skill set is not appreciated nor welcome at SM, so off I go. Take care.

Thank you for responding.

Iris ... respectfully agreeing to disagree is where it is at.

If Kyle Kingman has revealed the truth in his posts submitted to the Natalee's Freebirds' forum ... the implication is that the opportunity to return Natalee Holloway's remains to her family to rest on American soil was lost forever.  In the name of justice for Natalee Holloway and ... a measure of closure for her family ... I will explore this issue until confirmation is forthcoming.

Iris ... keep an open mind.  Think about it.  After carefully consideration ... Beth Holloway gave the Natalee's Freebird's permission to expose Kyle's own words.  Judging from the past almost four years ... Beth Holloway does not react without a foundation to derive from.  I do not think for one moment that this amazing woman would allow John Silvetti's reputation to come under scrutiny if there were not probably cause.

Janet


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #793 1/13/09
Post by: Tamikosmom on January 17, 2009, 05:33:47 PM

Janet

Thanks so much for continuing to bring these 3 critical posts forward.

And I hope you continue to.

Especially when we get told that this is not how the family feels.  ::MonkeyNoNo::

Thank you Sharon.

Janet


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #793 1/13/09
Post by: Tamikosmom on January 17, 2009, 05:37:40 PM
Nuuuut.  It is me again.

Would you please edit my above post.  It is such an important little word.

Beth Holloway does not react without a foundation ...

Thanks

Janet

FIXED (klaasend)


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #793 1/13/09
Post by: Tamikosmom on January 17, 2009, 05:45:06 PM
Hi Blue Moon.

Just you and me.

I hope you are having a good day.

Well ... off to supervise a move all the Christmas bins from the guest room to the storage space.  Youngest son and hubby are about to begin this task.

Janet



Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #793 1/13/09
Post by: Blue Moon on January 17, 2009, 05:52:44 PM
Hi Blue Moon.

Just you and me.

I hope you are having a good day.

Well ... off to supervise a move all the Christmas bins from the guest room to the storage space.  Youngest son and hubby are about to begin this task.

Janet



See ya.  I am about to log off for a while also.  Have some things I really need to accomplish today.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #793 1/13/09
Post by: Blonde on January 17, 2009, 06:11:38 PM
Kermit,

Jan says Eduardo Mansur was not on the ship.  Hotshot says that Jossy says he was on the ship the entire time.

Do you know if he was?

Thanks.

Looked like him to me in that picture that someone posted at SM.

Plus, I know that Kyle trusted Eduardo.



IMO this is Eduardo Mansur
(http://i18.photobucket.com/albums/b104/Blondeonahd/persistence/aruba21.jpg)


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #793 1/13/09
Post by: truthseeker2 on January 17, 2009, 06:40:15 PM
Blonde,

That does appear to be Eduardo.  I still wish Dana would have Jossy and Eduardo on one of his shows and ask them about the time Eduardo spent on the Persistence as well as some of the other search operations Eduardo took part in before the Persistence arrived.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #793 1/13/09
Post by: Magnolia on January 17, 2009, 06:49:31 PM
Jossy talked for a long time about doing his own ocean
search for Natalee.
Then all of a sudden Scheffer and Silvetti come on the scene,
and Jossy says no more about his search.
Now we hear that Jossy and Silvetti are busness associates.
Could it have been Jossy that arranged the contact between
Dave Holloway and Silvetti/Scheffer with a dual purpose in mind?


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #793 1/13/09
Post by: truthseeker2 on January 17, 2009, 07:00:36 PM
Jossy talked for a long time about doing his own ocean
search for Natalee.
Then all of a sudden Scheffer and Silvetti come on the scene,
and Jossy says no more about his search.
Now we hear that Jossy and Silvetti are busness associates.
Could it have been Jossy that arranged the contact between
Dave Holloway and Silvetti/Scheffer with a dual purpose in mind?

I guess it is possible that Jossy coordinated the introductions.  That would really make things interesting if that were the case.  I wonder if there is any way to tie Jossy to that search from a financial perpective???


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #793 1/13/09
Post by: Hotshot on January 17, 2009, 07:06:56 PM
You have to ask just how much Jug is clued-in by Beth -- they ARE divorced. I have liked Jug -- but you gotta ask!

lol

I tried that once.  ::MonkeyRoll::

My advice -- DON'T go there  ::MonkeyLaugh::

Sharon, do you know who put Schaffer in touch with the family?
Tim Miller     You going to bash him too?  Why not just let Kermit run the cage if she's so good. You guys are funny, you look at her like she's G-d or something.  Listen to yourselves.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #793 1/13/09
Post by: Blue Moon on January 17, 2009, 07:12:05 PM
You have to ask just how much Jug is clued-in by Beth -- they ARE divorced. I have liked Jug -- but you gotta ask!

lol

I tried that once.  ::MonkeyRoll::

My advice -- DON'T go there  ::MonkeyLaugh::

Sharon, do you know who put Schaffer in touch with the family?
Tim Miller     You going to bash him too?  Why not just let Kermit run the cage if she's so good. You guys are funny, you look at her like she's G-d or something.  Listen to yourselves.

I WASN'T BASHING ANYONE.  You got a problem?  Take it elsewhere.  Besides, I thought the answer was going to be YOU!


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #793 1/13/09
Post by: Tamikosmom on January 17, 2009, 07:15:55 PM
You have to ask just how much Jug is clued-in by Beth -- they ARE divorced. I have liked Jug -- but you gotta ask!

lol

I tried that once.  ::MonkeyRoll::

My advice -- DON'T go there  ::MonkeyLaugh::

Sharon, do you know who put Schaffer in touch with the family?
Tim Miller     You going to bash him too?  Why not just let Kermit run the cage if she's so good. You guys are funny, you look at her like she's G-d or something.  Listen to yourselves.

No me!!  As some have discussed on another forum... the thought that Tim Miller would be collaborating with Schaffer in a fund raising scheme to raise funds to benefit an oil mapping venture as well as the TES organization under the guise of search for Natalee Holloway's remains is too much for me to comprehend.

I am inclined to believe that Tim Miller was deceived by Shaefer into believing the Persistence undertaking was not twofold ... it was all about searching for Natalee Holloway remains.  My heart tells me that TES would not be knowingly soliciting funds for Louis Shaefer oil mapping venture ... a venture that would be on the "lookout" for something Natalee Holloway related ... without providing full disclosure to potential donors.

Janet


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #793 1/13/09
Post by: klaasend on January 17, 2009, 07:17:01 PM
Hotshot - the only thing close to bashing here is our opinion of Kyle who by all accounts at minimum was BSing about the trap and at most complicit in a coverup.

Prove to us it's neither because Kyle's words say otherwise but I'm open to all sides.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #793 1/13/09
Post by: Blue Moon on January 17, 2009, 07:17:50 PM
Hotshot, I ask questions because I don't have ALL the answers.  I do not know anyone personally in this case.  I have the greatest respect for Tim Miller.  I did not know he put Shaeffer in touch with family. 

If Klaas or Red feels I shouldn't be asking questions I would hope they tell me that upfront.

Blue Moon


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #793 1/13/09
Post by: Tamikosmom on January 17, 2009, 07:19:57 PM
Klaas ... please edit my last post.

have discussed on another forum ...

Thank you.

Janet


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #793 1/13/09
Post by: sharon on January 17, 2009, 07:20:10 PM
Hotshot, I ask questions because I don't have ALL the answers.  I do not know anyone personally in this case.  I have the greatest respect for Tim Miller.  I did not know he put Shaeffer in touch with family. 

If Klaas or Red feels I shouldn't be asking questions I would hope they tell me that upfront.

Blue Moon

Which just BEGS the question -- and how did Schaeffar and Tim hook up?

Inquiring minds want to know.   ::MonkeyWink::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #793 1/13/09
Post by: Tamikosmom on January 17, 2009, 07:21:44 PM
Hotshot, I ask questions because I don't have ALL the answers.  I do not know anyone personally in this case.  I have the greatest respect for Tim Miller.  I did not know he put Shaeffer in touch with family. 

If Klaas or Red feels I shouldn't be asking questions I would hope they tell me that upfront.

Blue Moon

Quote from: Kermit on Today at 05:51:26 PM
We are told this is from an email, and it explains what Jug said to someone else about John Silvetti and what Jug knew:


"I asked Jug about Schaeffer...he is the oil guy. He was the one that provided the cash to get down there. Silvetti knew he would get more business from Schaeffer if he mapped....while they were looking...the ocean floor. All the crew was asked to do was look for Natalee or anything suspicious as in small things like a cage or bones or whatever.
They do a large mapping process while they are looking for the details. Schaeffer would use the large mapping of the general layout of the ocean floor to further look for oil...etc...while they looked for Natalee too.

Silvetti was the one that offered to look for Natalee and not Schaefer



Kermit ... who is "I".

I do not have a problem with a venture that is two-fold.  However ... I have a problem that TES was not upfront regarding this dual venture when donations were requested.  At all times the impression was given the the Persistence undertaking was all about searching for Natalee Holloway's remains.

The following words of Tim Miller implies that Louis S. was in on the Natalee Holloway aspect of the venture.  John S. may have initiated it but ... Louis S. was aware.

Janet

++++++

FOX ONLINE - JAMIE COLBY
July 15, 2007


COLBY:  Tim, why are they (Arubans) standing in your way?

MILLER: I don't think they can stand in our way. With the equipment we got and if we have to go in off of Venezuela. Whereever we need to go into, we've got the equipment. In fact they are more than welcome to be on the ship with us. The ships that we are taking over are a 265 foot ship and a 340 foot ship which have all the latest technology on it. In fact the owner of this company, Louis Shaeffer of Superior Offshore International, Louis called Dave Holloway up about two months ago when I was at Louis' house. He said "Mr Holloway, I'm going to promise you something, if your daughter is in a metal container out there in that water, we are going to bring her home."


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #793 1/13/09
Post by: Blue Moon on January 17, 2009, 07:22:04 PM
Hotshot, I ask questions because I don't have ALL the answers.  I do not know anyone personally in this case.  I have the greatest respect for Tim Miller.  I did not know he put Shaeffer in touch with family. 

If Klaas or Red feels I shouldn't be asking questions I would hope they tell me that upfront.

Blue Moon

Which just BEGS the question -- and how did Schaeffar and Tim hook up?

Inquiring minds want to know.   ::MonkeyWink::

Inquiring minds means you are bashing.  Go figure. 

I have LOTS of questions about this venture and I have lots of questions about the mansurs of Aruba.   See my signature line about asking questions.  I won't be deterred from asking and I hope Hotshot will provide all the answers.  All I am asking.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #793 1/13/09
Post by: wreck on January 17, 2009, 07:24:09 PM
Gads! Someone mentioned that Lewis Black was doing Aruba ads. This was on my Yahoo mail page today!

(http://i181.photobucket.com/albums/x58/rorothe/aruba.jpg)


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #793 1/13/09
Post by: Tamikosmom on January 17, 2009, 07:24:14 PM
Hotshot, I ask questions because I don't have ALL the answers.  I do not know anyone personally in this case.  I have the greatest respect for Tim Miller.  I did not know he put Shaeffer in touch with family. 

If Klaas or Red feels I shouldn't be asking questions I would hope they tell me that upfront.

Blue Moon


FOX ONLINE - JAMIE COLBY
July 15, 2007


COLBY:  Tim, why are they (Arubans) standing in your way?

MILLER: I don't think they can stand in our way. With the equipment we got and if we have to go in off of Venezuela. Whereever we need to go into, we've got the equipment. In fact they are more than welcome to be on the ship with us. The ships that we are taking over are a 265 foot ship and a 340 foot ship which have all the latest technology on it. In fact the owner of this company, Louis Shaeffer of Superior Offshore International, Louis called Dave Holloway up about two months ago when I was at Louis' house. He said "Mr Holloway, I'm going to promise you something, if your daughter is in a metal container out there in that water, we are going to bring her home."


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #793 1/13/09
Post by: Blue Moon on January 17, 2009, 07:27:06 PM
Gads! Someone mentioned that Lewis Black was doing Aruba ads. This was on my Yahoo mail page today!

(http://i181.photobucket.com/albums/x58/rorothe/aruba.jpg)

"The grumpiest man in America", that will win them a bunch of tourists for sure.  (who is Lewis Black?)


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #793 1/13/09
Post by: Tamikosmom on January 17, 2009, 07:34:20 PM
Hotshot, I ask questions because I don't have ALL the answers.  I do not know anyone personally in this case.  I have the greatest respect for Tim Miller.  I did not know he put Shaeffer in touch with family. 

If Klaas or Red feels I shouldn't be asking questions I would hope they tell me that upfront.

Blue Moon

Which just BEGS the question -- and how did Schaeffar and Tim hook up?

Inquiring minds want to know.   ::MonkeyWink::

I wondered that too Sharon.

I pray that it was Louis Shaefer who contacted Tim Miller implying that he would be willing to conduct a search for Natalee Holloway's remains if Tim Miller could raise the funds through the TES organization.  I pray that Tim Miller was unaware that the undertaking would include mapping for oil targets.

At this point in time ... I refuse to believe otherwise.

Louis Shaefer has been referred to as a philanthropist and ... that is why I initially believe that the Persistence undertaking was a mission of the heart.

Janet


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #793 1/13/09
Post by: wreck on January 17, 2009, 07:36:11 PM
"90,000 friends you haven't met yet and 9,000 rapists, murderers, thieves, and liars to ensure you don't go home relaxed (if you make it home at all)"


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #793 1/13/09
Post by: sharon on January 17, 2009, 07:38:24 PM
Janet, if Tim initiated contact I would only believe it was because he believed Scaheffer could help. Tim had been looking for all the help he could get to search the ocean -- for quite some time.

imo, Tim Miller would not have the capacity to perceive otherwise. His heart is too good.

imo


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #793 1/13/09
Post by: bc73 on January 17, 2009, 07:39:58 PM
"90,000 friends you haven't met yet and 9,000 rapists, murderers, thieves, and liars to ensure you don't go home relaxed (if you make it home at all)"
Does that leave us with 81,000 kidnappers?


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #793 1/13/09
Post by: sharon on January 17, 2009, 07:41:22 PM
Janet (I wish I had that edit button, too)

I forgot to add -- I believe it was WhiskeyGirl who posted a bunch of Silvetti's prior philanthropic efforts.

iirc -- nothing in the same ballpark -- that I remember. But I could be remembering incorrectly. :shrug:
.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #793 1/13/09
Post by: Tamikosmom on January 17, 2009, 07:47:20 PM
Janet, if Tim initiated contact I would only believe it was because he believed Scaheffer could help. Tim had been looking for all the help he could get to search the ocean -- for quite some time.

imo, Tim Miller would not have the capacity to perceive otherwise. His heart is too good.

imo

Sharon ... that is my hope and prayer.

I am of the opinion that Tim's trusting nature implies that decernment in regards to relationship can be compromised.  I believe that Dave Holloway fits into this category.  Hey ... I believe that ... to some extent ... my hubby fits into this category.  However ... he has me to set him straight.

 ::MonkeyHaHa::

It is sad.  The outcome of not have the ability to decern the "good guys" from the "bad guys" can have serious and lasting consequences.

Janet


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #793 1/13/09
Post by: Blue Moon on January 17, 2009, 07:59:59 PM
Ya know, I am getting to the point of throwing up my hands.  No matter what is said someone comes in here and throws out the "bashing" phrase and then they run and hide.  Just spill it all and get it over with.

Hotshot said to "just look at us" for believing Kermit.  I would like to hear from Hotshot about this entire Persistence search trip.  Also, Kyle needs to come out of hiding and face his demons.  I also would like to hear from Jossy and Eduardo and I also wish that Dana could get them both on so we can hear their take on all this since Eduardo was on the ship the entire time.  Who knows, it could help to clear some things up.  (JMO)



Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #793 1/13/09
Post by: Tamikosmom on January 17, 2009, 08:03:31 PM
Sharon

This is an example of what I am referring to concerning discernment regarding relationships ... decernment regarding who are the "good guys" and who are the "bad guys".

Why would Dave Holloway believe that the Aruban Hotel Association would contribute financially to an endeavor to locate his daughter's remains.  This Association is perceived to be a participant in the coverup that has prevented justice from prevailing for an eighteen year old citizen since the get go.

Logic dictates if the Aruban Hotel Association ... the enemy ... donated funds to the Persistence endeavor ... there was a cost to John Silvetti and ... that cost had nothing to do with justice for Natalee Holloway.

Janet

++++++


jdsurveyor1 Newbie Posts: 11
John Silvetti, the Persistence and the Search for Natalee «
Reply #13 on: April 03, 2008, 07:52:13 PM »


The important thing is to raise funds. It will require corporate support as well as private donations. Dave and Beth have been doing a great job getting the word out and while I was on the island, Dave put me in contact with the head of the Hotel Association who is working on raising a sizeable amount. So many on the island are supporting our efforts as well as people from all over the world. The media really blew the cage out of proportion. Although the cage initially provided some moments of "what is in there", I warned all on board that none of this information was to leave the boat. It was very suspect that a cage of this size was found where it was on the seafloor relative to the coast. My feelings were this was highly unusual and probably had something to do with something, but not what we were after. It was decided that the cage would be investigated further by divers, however, it was designated as only a target of interest. The crew moved onto other targets. Unfortunately, inexperience and frustration led to premature statements, including that we had found herI don't think anyone was more upset than I that this information came off the boat and caused the Holloway family more grief!

http://scaredmonkeys.net/index.php?topic=4371.msg625934#msg625934



Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #793 1/13/09
Post by: wreck on January 17, 2009, 08:04:44 PM
Ya know, I am getting to the point of throwing up my hands.  No matter what is said someone comes in here and throws out the "bashing" phrase and then they run and hide.  Just spill it all and get it over with.

Hotshot said to "just look at us" for believing Kermit.  I would like to hear from Hotshot about this entire Persistence search trip.  Also, Kyle needs to come out of hiding and face his demons.  I also would like to hear from Jossy and Eduardo and I also wish that Dana could get them both on so we can hear their take on all this since Eduardo was on the ship the entire time.  Who knows, it could help to clear some things up.  (JMO)


With the insinuations here, you would THINK Silvetti and Kyle would be screaming to holy hell if they were innocent.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #793 1/13/09
Post by: Blue Moon on January 17, 2009, 08:08:03 PM
Ya know, I am getting to the point of throwing up my hands.  No matter what is said someone comes in here and throws out the "bashing" phrase and then they run and hide.  Just spill it all and get it over with.

Hotshot said to "just look at us" for believing Kermit.  I would like to hear from Hotshot about this entire Persistence search trip.  Also, Kyle needs to come out of hiding and face his demons.  I also would like to hear from Jossy and Eduardo and I also wish that Dana could get them both on so we can hear their take on all this since Eduardo was on the ship the entire time.  Who knows, it could help to clear some things up.  (JMO)


With the insinuations here, you would THINK Silvetti and Kyle would be screaming to holy hell if they were innocent.

I think Silvetti and Kyle have lots of people to speak for them.  It isn't working in my book.  How's it working for everyone else?


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #793 1/13/09
Post by: Tamikosmom on January 17, 2009, 08:10:21 PM
Ya know, I am getting to the point of throwing up my hands.  No matter what is said someone comes in here and throws out the "bashing" phrase and then they run and hide.  Just spill it all and get it over with.

Hotshot said to "just look at us" for believing Kermit.  I would like to hear from Hotshot about this entire Persistence search trip.  Also, Kyle needs to come out of hiding and face his demons.  I also would like to hear from Jossy and Eduardo and I also wish that Dana could get them both on so we can hear their take on all this since Eduardo was on the ship the entire time.  Who knows, it could help to clear some things up.  (JMO)



Blue Moon ... today you are allowed to throw up your hands.  However ... tomorrow is a new day.

Hugs

Janet


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #793 1/13/09
Post by: Blue Moon on January 17, 2009, 08:12:14 PM
Ya know, I am getting to the point of throwing up my hands.  No matter what is said someone comes in here and throws out the "bashing" phrase and then they run and hide.  Just spill it all and get it over with.

Hotshot said to "just look at us" for believing Kermit.  I would like to hear from Hotshot about this entire Persistence search trip.  Also, Kyle needs to come out of hiding and face his demons.  I also would like to hear from Jossy and Eduardo and I also wish that Dana could get them both on so we can hear their take on all this since Eduardo was on the ship the entire time.  Who knows, it could help to clear some things up.  (JMO)



Blue Moon ... today you are allowed to throw up your hands.  However ... tomorrow is a new day.

Hugs

Janet

Thanks Janet. 


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #793 1/13/09
Post by: Tamikosmom on January 17, 2009, 08:14:17 PM
Ya know, I am getting to the point of throwing up my hands.  No matter what is said someone comes in here and throws out the "bashing" phrase and then they run and hide.  Just spill it all and get it over with.

Hotshot said to "just look at us" for believing Kermit.  I would like to hear from Hotshot about this entire Persistence search trip.  Also, Kyle needs to come out of hiding and face his demons.  I also would like to hear from Jossy and Eduardo and I also wish that Dana could get them both on so we can hear their take on all this since Eduardo was on the ship the entire time.  Who knows, it could help to clear some things up.  (JMO)


With the insinuations here, you would THINK Silvetti and Kyle would be screaming to holy hell if they were innocent.

I think Silvetti and Kyle have lots of people to speak for them.  It isn't working in my book.  How's it working for everyone else?

Kyle Kingman has spoken for himself ... loud and clear.  Blue Moon ... stay focused on Kyle's own words.  Do not let others distract you.  The story Kyle has related in regards to the deception of the Persistence undertaking is huge.

Janet


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #793 1/13/09
Post by: texasmom on January 17, 2009, 08:16:38 PM
Ya know, I am getting to the point of throwing up my hands.  No matter what is said someone comes in here and throws out the "bashing" phrase and then they run and hide.  Just spill it all and get it over with.

Hotshot said to "just look at us" for believing Kermit.  I would like to hear from Hotshot about this entire Persistence search trip.  Also, Kyle needs to come out of hiding and face his demons.  I also would like to hear from Jossy and Eduardo and I also wish that Dana could get them both on so we can hear their take on all this since Eduardo was on the ship the entire time.  Who knows, it could help to clear some things up.  (JMO)


With the insinuations here, you would THINK Silvetti and Kyle would be screaming to holy hell if they were innocent.

I think Silvetti and Kyle have lots of people to speak for them.  It isn't working in my book.  How's it working for everyone else?

Nope, not working here either.   ::MonkeyTongue::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #793 1/13/09
Post by: sharon on January 17, 2009, 08:23:01 PM
BlueMoon -- I saw Kyle's posts 'live' sotaspeak  ::MonkeyWink:: I personally don't need anyone else to speak for him. But I'm still curious as to why others do speak for him?

Janet Many of us have 'questioned' some of the friendships and relationships for a long time.

But I'm lucky enough to have never walked in Beth's or Dave's shoes -- so who knows.

It would not be the first time business and philanthropy were combined, either. But it usually not a 'hidden' agenda -- not to say a conflict of interest, as in this specific case.

I also remember several of us monkeys questioning kyle's original naivete -- ' you may say there is corruption but I will hold my judgement' to paraphrase the sentiment. PI also questioned it.

The outcome is not a surprise to me. But just one more (albeit HUGE) disappointment in the journey that will be Justice for Natalee. And there will be. We all stand with the girl.

In the interim, 3 1/2 years to date, I spend time hoping and thinking with old friends.

And 'old' is an adjective describing the length of our friendship. Certainly NOT either one of us personally.  ::MonkeyTongue::

Goodnight my friends. Tip off in 10 minutes. lol



Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #793 1/13/09
Post by: KYcat on January 17, 2009, 08:26:03 PM
It seems to me that a few people are previledged to be able to post here at SM and at C&G.    Unfortunately, there are a few of us that do not have that luxury and therefore we cannot know what is being discussed there.  Maybe, they could enlighten us instead of coming here and YELLING at us.  I, for one, would like to know their theories.  Evidently they do not agree with ours but it doesn't give them the right to just jump in and out and accuse us of bashing!
 
I, as well as many others, have said this before, PUT UP OR SHUT UP (ok, those are my words but the jest is the same).

 ::MonkeyCool::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #793 1/13/09
Post by: Tamikosmom on January 17, 2009, 08:27:44 PM

Sharon ... I am off too.

Friends are bringing Chinese Food ... I have the rice steamer on and ... hubby just got back from the bakery with some goodies.

A night of Yahtzee awaits ... I think.

GOOD NIGHT MONKEYS!!!  GOOD NIGHT ZOOKEEPERS!!

Janet
5:30 PM PT


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #793 1/13/09
Post by: texasmom on January 17, 2009, 08:29:06 PM
Goodnight sharon and Janet!  Hope you both have a wonderful evening! 

 ::MonkeyCool::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #793 1/13/09
Post by: Tamikosmom on January 17, 2009, 08:30:59 PM
It seems to me that a few people are previledged to be able to post here at SM and at C&G.    Unfortunately, there are a few of us that do not have that luxury and therefore we cannot know what is being discussed there.  Maybe, they could enlighten us instead of coming here and YELLING at us.  I, for one, would like to know their theories.  Evidently they do not agree with ours but it doesn't give them the right to just jump in and out and accuse us of bashing!
 
I, as well as many others, have said this before, PUT UP OR SHUT UP (ok, those are my words but the jest is the same).

 ::MonkeyCool::

I agree KYcat.

Janet



Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #793 1/13/09
Post by: Blue Moon on January 17, 2009, 08:32:08 PM
It seems to me that a few people are previledged to be able to post here at SM and at C&G.    Unfortunately, there are a few of us that do not have that luxury and therefore we cannot know what is being discussed there.  Maybe, they could enlighten us instead of coming here and YELLING at us.  I, for one, would like to know their theories.  Evidently they do not agree with ours but it doesn't give them the right to just jump in and out and accuse us of bashing!
 
I, as well as many others, have said this before, PUT UP OR SHUT UP (ok, those are my words but the jest is the same).

 ::MonkeyCool::

I agree

(OT, is that little girl kin to you?  She is precious......)


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #793 1/13/09
Post by: KYcat on January 17, 2009, 08:33:02 PM
Goodnight Janet and Sharon   Have a wonderful evening.  I am sorry that I missed being here with you today.

 ::MonkeyWink::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #793 1/13/09
Post by: WhiskeyGirl on January 17, 2009, 08:35:03 PM
I have faith in Persistence and her crew.

The finger is still pointing at Aruba, PJ2K and others.  There are plenty of answers in that group waiting for a voice. 

How hard would it be for any of the people involved with Natalee's disappearance to step up and tell the truth?

Any update on Dr. Phil?  Sometimes, I think justice for Natalee is being held up for resolution to the Kalpoe/Dr. Phil case.  Nothing will be found until Aruba, Kalpoes, and others get that $$$. 

I don't think they will ever return Natalee, I don't think she was in that trap being discussed.  I think she's still out in the ocean, in one of the other targets. 

Aruba goal - by any means necessary, stop the search for Natalee and the truth.


jmho


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #793 1/13/09
Post by: KYcat on January 17, 2009, 08:35:36 PM
It seems to me that a few people are previledged to be able to post here at SM and at C&G.    Unfortunately, there are a few of us that do not have that luxury and therefore we cannot know what is being discussed there.  Maybe, they could enlighten us instead of coming here and YELLING at us.  I, for one, would like to know their theories.  Evidently they do not agree with ours but it doesn't give them the right to just jump in and out and accuse us of bashing!
 
I, as well as many others, have said this before, PUT UP OR SHUT UP (ok, those are my words but the jest is the same).

 ::MonkeyCool::

I agree

(OT, is that little girl kin to you?  She is precious......)

Ohhhh, Thank you very much.  She is one of my grandbabies.  This was taken on a Sunday afternoon.  She looked so adorable that morning, all dressed up for church, in her frilly dress and socks, and black patented leather shoes.  That afternoon it was off to play in the mud!

Sorry O/T

 ::MonkeyWink::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #793 1/13/09
Post by: KYcat on January 17, 2009, 08:39:53 PM
WhiskeyGirl, I always appreciate your posts.

Since you think she is still out in the ocean, why has there not been anymore talk of going back and searching those targets? 

It has been way too long with no mention of going back?  I have to wonder why?!?



Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #793 1/13/09
Post by: texasmom on January 17, 2009, 08:41:24 PM
It seems to me that a few people are previledged to be able to post here at SM and at C&G.    Unfortunately, there are a few of us that do not have that luxury and therefore we cannot know what is being discussed there.  Maybe, they could enlighten us instead of coming here and YELLING at us.  I, for one, would like to know their theories.  Evidently they do not agree with ours but it doesn't give them the right to just jump in and out and accuse us of bashing!
 
I, as well as many others, have said this before, PUT UP OR SHUT UP (ok, those are my words but the jest is the same).

 ::MonkeyCool::

I agree

(OT, is that little girl kin to you?  She is precious......)

Ohhhh, Thank you very much.  She is one of my grandbabies.  This was taken on a Sunday afternoon.  She looked so adorable that morning, all dressed up for church, in her frilly dress and socks, and black patented leather shoes.  That afternoon it was off to play in the mud!

Sorry O/T

 ::MonkeyWink::

I love the avi too KYcat!  Reminds me of a pic I have of my boys when they were about 3 and 6, the youngest was covered in mud head to toe, the oldest only as high as the youngest could reach...and missing a shoe!   ::MonkeyHaHa::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #793 1/13/09
Post by: KYcat on January 17, 2009, 08:46:16 PM
It seems to me that a few people are previledged to be able to post here at SM and at C&G.    Unfortunately, there are a few of us that do not have that luxury and therefore we cannot know what is being discussed there.  Maybe, they could enlighten us instead of coming here and YELLING at us.  I, for one, would like to know their theories.  Evidently they do not agree with ours but it doesn't give them the right to just jump in and out and accuse us of bashing!
 
I, as well as many others, have said this before, PUT UP OR SHUT UP (ok, those are my words but the jest is the same).

 ::MonkeyCool::

I agree

(OT, is that little girl kin to you?  She is precious......)

Ohhhh, Thank you very much.  She is one of my grandbabies.  This was taken on a Sunday afternoon.  She looked so adorable that morning, all dressed up for church, in her frilly dress and socks, and black patented leather shoes.  That afternoon it was off to play in the mud!

Sorry O/T

 ::MonkeyWink::

I love the avi too KYcat!  Reminds me of a pic I have of my boys when they were about 3 and 6, the youngest was covered in mud head to toe, the oldest only as high as the youngest could reach...and missing a shoe!   ::MonkeyHaHa::

Too Cute!  Kids know how to have fun.  How could anyone not love the spirit of a child!

 ::MonkeyHaHa::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #793 1/13/09
Post by: San on January 17, 2009, 08:50:41 PM
HERE IS MY QUESTION.  WHY ARE PEOPLE SO BENT ON DISCREDITING KERMIT.  WHERE IS THE PROOF THAT PEOPLE ARE SAYING KERMIT IS LYING.

POST THE DAMN PROOF.

I DON'T WANT TO HERE WELL I TALKED TO THIS PERSON AND THEY SAID THIS.  TELL THE PERSON TO POST JUST LIKE KERMIT POSTS AND BACKS UP WHAT SHE POSTS.

Speaking only for myself, this is not an attempt to discredit Kermit.  In my posts, I am merely pointing out the fact that everything I have read says that Kermit and the Freebirds based their theory ONLY on Kyle's words and pictures, none of which have proven Natalee was in the cage.  I personally don't believe Kyle, so I cannot believe the Persistence conspiracy theory.   I do believe that Kyle told Kermit and others what Kermit has reported.  My question is: what makes Kyle so credible?  And why do some of you jump to the conclusion that a different opinion is an attempt to discredit other monkeys?   Can't someone have a differing opinion without trying to discredit others?  Or be a mole?

On a lighter note, I love the new "pirate" thing.  I'm hoping to see some new pics of the Persistence crew in their pirate gear.  Picturing Captain Sparrow.

It's OK if you don't believe Kyle.  But why was Kyle so mad when information came out about the fabric and what was in that cage.  Why couldn't he prove that it was not the truth.  He posted the words for everyone to read.  People came to the conclusion that he was lying and they compared his words from SM to Freebirds.  Kermit gave Kyle the opportunity and Kyle ran away.

Some people that posted here on SM are trying to discredit Kermit.  What do they base their opinion on that they feel Kermit is lying.  Kemit has posted Kyle's own words.  Is it because it is the truth and he cannot prove that Kermit might be lying.  Pictures don't lie.  We have seen the bags in the cage because they were Kyles.  Some of these same people had access to the same words that Kermit has posted.  Why can't they prove that Kermit is lying.  But they all come on here trying to bash Kermit.  PROVE IT.

Some people believe in CapsLockWizard I don't.  I am not bashing the man I just have no faith in what he is saying.  I am not putting my faith in a man who decided to join SM right before the Persistence made their trip to Aruba.   He decided he was going to solve a riddle.  If he feels that he did then good for him.

Something happened here and we are trying to get to the truth.

Who is telling the truth.  Is Kyle telling the truth of Kermit telling the truth.  That's what is boils down to.

Kyle was a professional who had a job to do.  A professional who was suppose to be dedicating his time into searching for Natalee Holloway's remains.  This is a man who had a wife and child and even named his child after Natalee if I recall correctly.

Why was Kyle so upset about what Private Eye posted that he asked to speak to him in private.  Was he upset because he knew that he didn't give that information out and it got leaked.  Was he upset because he knew it was the truth and the truth wasn't suppose to come out.

The truth seems to stir a lot of emotions whether good or bad.

One more note.  I have never seen Kermit be disrespectful towards any poster.

I will say this one last time.  I think Kyle is trying to pull off a SCAM to make money.  I personally do not see Natalee's remains or a shoe in the trap photos.  Does someone have proof that I have not seen that these are Natalee's or (anyone's) remains?  (Besides Kyle's words).  Most posters completely disregarded posters who said the "skull" was too small to be a skull.  If Kermit cracks the case I'll be thrilled for the family, but I haven't seen anything that looks like proof to me yet.  I'm sure they are doing things behind the scenes and that's great.  I can only base my opinion on what I see. 

Regarding Caps, he actually brought forward a witness that passed polygraphs.  I know you have all discounted this witness.  I guess you have your reasons for believing Kermit without any evidence, but not believing Caps.  If your intention was to make the Natalee site feel unwelcome for posters who question the group consensus, you have suceeded.  Good luck to you all.  I'm not wasting any more time here.

I didn't see where I made you unwelcome.   I was stating my opinion just like you were stating yours.

You seem to think Kyle is FOS and that's fine.  We all have different opinions on this subject.

With that said I have a saying I use quite frequently and that is don't let the door hit you in the ass on the way out.  There have been plenty of posters for the past month who have said "I'm done with this place".  Do me a favor and make it permanent.

Now that is a nasty post by San and I stick behind my words.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #793 1/13/09
Post by: KYcat on January 17, 2009, 08:54:03 PM
I had such high hopes for the Persistence endeavor.  But that changed along the way.  I feel like Natalee has been let down and betrayed again.  I truly feel that in my heart.  My feelings are based on the information that has come out regarding the actions of some aboard the Persistence.  IMO those actions were less than admirable.

If Natalee's own family, PI, had issues with the endeavor, that speaks volumnes to me.  It also validates my feelings.

If everything was above board with the search then why haven't those who are in question come forth and proclaimed that? 

Not a peep.

 


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #793 1/13/09
Post by: KYcat on January 17, 2009, 08:58:55 PM
San   ::MonkeyHaHa::

The song "Taking Care of Business" is on the tv.............  I was laughing out loud.........

San.............Taking Care Of Business!!!

 ::MonkeyDance::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #793 1/13/09
Post by: texasmom on January 17, 2009, 08:59:48 PM
HERE IS MY QUESTION.  WHY ARE PEOPLE SO BENT ON DISCREDITING KERMIT.  WHERE IS THE PROOF THAT PEOPLE ARE SAYING KERMIT IS LYING.

POST THE DAMN PROOF.

I DON'T WANT TO HERE WELL I TALKED TO THIS PERSON AND THEY SAID THIS.  TELL THE PERSON TO POST JUST LIKE KERMIT POSTS AND BACKS UP WHAT SHE POSTS.

Speaking only for myself, this is not an attempt to discredit Kermit.  In my posts, I am merely pointing out the fact that everything I have read says that Kermit and the Freebirds based their theory ONLY on Kyle's words and pictures, none of which have proven Natalee was in the cage.  I personally don't believe Kyle, so I cannot believe the Persistence conspiracy theory.   I do believe that Kyle told Kermit and others what Kermit has reported.  My question is: what makes Kyle so credible?  And why do some of you jump to the conclusion that a different opinion is an attempt to discredit other monkeys?   Can't someone have a differing opinion without trying to discredit others?  Or be a mole?

On a lighter note, I love the new "pirate" thing.  I'm hoping to see some new pics of the Persistence crew in their pirate gear.  Picturing Captain Sparrow.

It's OK if you don't believe Kyle.  But why was Kyle so mad when information came out about the fabric and what was in that cage.  Why couldn't he prove that it was not the truth.  He posted the words for everyone to read.  People came to the conclusion that he was lying and they compared his words from SM to Freebirds.  Kermit gave Kyle the opportunity and Kyle ran away.

Some people that posted here on SM are trying to discredit Kermit.  What do they base their opinion on that they feel Kermit is lying.  Kemit has posted Kyle's own words.  Is it because it is the truth and he cannot prove that Kermit might be lying.  Pictures don't lie.  We have seen the bags in the cage because they were Kyles.  Some of these same people had access to the same words that Kermit has posted.  Why can't they prove that Kermit is lying.  But they all come on here trying to bash Kermit.  PROVE IT.

Some people believe in CapsLockWizard I don't.  I am not bashing the man I just have no faith in what he is saying.  I am not putting my faith in a man who decided to join SM right before the Persistence made their trip to Aruba.   He decided he was going to solve a riddle.  If he feels that he did then good for him.

Something happened here and we are trying to get to the truth.

Who is telling the truth.  Is Kyle telling the truth of Kermit telling the truth.  That's what is boils down to.

Kyle was a professional who had a job to do.  A professional who was suppose to be dedicating his time into searching for Natalee Holloway's remains.  This is a man who had a wife and child and even named his child after Natalee if I recall correctly.

Why was Kyle so upset about what Private Eye posted that he asked to speak to him in private.  Was he upset because he knew that he didn't give that information out and it got leaked.  Was he upset because he knew it was the truth and the truth wasn't suppose to come out.

The truth seems to stir a lot of emotions whether good or bad.

One more note.  I have never seen Kermit be disrespectful towards any poster.

I will say this one last time.  I think Kyle is trying to pull off a SCAM to make money.  I personally do not see Natalee's remains or a shoe in the trap photos.  Does someone have proof that I have not seen that these are Natalee's or (anyone's) remains?  (Besides Kyle's words).  Most posters completely disregarded posters who said the "skull" was too small to be a skull.  If Kermit cracks the case I'll be thrilled for the family, but I haven't seen anything that looks like proof to me yet.  I'm sure they are doing things behind the scenes and that's great.  I can only base my opinion on what I see. 

Regarding Caps, he actually brought forward a witness that passed polygraphs.  I know you have all discounted this witness.  I guess you have your reasons for believing Kermit without any evidence, but not believing Caps.  If your intention was to make the Natalee site feel unwelcome for posters who question the group consensus, you have suceeded.  Good luck to you all.  I'm not wasting any more time here.

I didn't see where I made you unwelcome.   I was stating my opinion just like you were stating yours.

You seem to think Kyle is FOS and that's fine.  We all have different opinions on this subject.

With that said I have a saying I use quite frequently and that is don't let the door hit you in the ass on the way out.  There have been plenty of posters for the past month who have said "I'm done with this place".  Do me a favor and make it permanent.

Now that is a nasty post by San and I stick behind my words.

Thank you San...if you only knew how bad I wanted to post that today.  I was practically screaming it from the top of my lungs.   ::MonkeyDance::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #793 1/13/09
Post by: Blue Moon on January 17, 2009, 09:00:55 PM
HERE IS MY QUESTION.  WHY ARE PEOPLE SO BENT ON DISCREDITING KERMIT.  WHERE IS THE PROOF THAT PEOPLE ARE SAYING KERMIT IS LYING.

POST THE DAMN PROOF.

I DON'T WANT TO HERE WELL I TALKED TO THIS PERSON AND THEY SAID THIS.  TELL THE PERSON TO POST JUST LIKE KERMIT POSTS AND BACKS UP WHAT SHE POSTS.

Speaking only for myself, this is not an attempt to discredit Kermit.  In my posts, I am merely pointing out the fact that everything I have read says that Kermit and the Freebirds based their theory ONLY on Kyle's words and pictures, none of which have proven Natalee was in the cage.  I personally don't believe Kyle, so I cannot believe the Persistence conspiracy theory.   I do believe that Kyle told Kermit and others what Kermit has reported.  My question is: what makes Kyle so credible?  And why do some of you jump to the conclusion that a different opinion is an attempt to discredit other monkeys?   Can't someone have a differing opinion without trying to discredit others?  Or be a mole?

On a lighter note, I love the new "pirate" thing.  I'm hoping to see some new pics of the Persistence crew in their pirate gear.  Picturing Captain Sparrow.

It's OK if you don't believe Kyle.  But why was Kyle so mad when information came out about the fabric and what was in that cage.  Why couldn't he prove that it was not the truth.  He posted the words for everyone to read.  People came to the conclusion that he was lying and they compared his words from SM to Freebirds.  Kermit gave Kyle the opportunity and Kyle ran away.

Some people that posted here on SM are trying to discredit Kermit.  What do they base their opinion on that they feel Kermit is lying.  Kemit has posted Kyle's own words.  Is it because it is the truth and he cannot prove that Kermit might be lying.  Pictures don't lie.  We have seen the bags in the cage because they were Kyles.  Some of these same people had access to the same words that Kermit has posted.  Why can't they prove that Kermit is lying.  But they all come on here trying to bash Kermit.  PROVE IT.

Some people believe in CapsLockWizard I don't.  I am not bashing the man I just have no faith in what he is saying.  I am not putting my faith in a man who decided to join SM right before the Persistence made their trip to Aruba.   He decided he was going to solve a riddle.  If he feels that he did then good for him.

Something happened here and we are trying to get to the truth.

Who is telling the truth.  Is Kyle telling the truth of Kermit telling the truth.  That's what is boils down to.

Kyle was a professional who had a job to do.  A professional who was suppose to be dedicating his time into searching for Natalee Holloway's remains.  This is a man who had a wife and child and even named his child after Natalee if I recall correctly.

Why was Kyle so upset about what Private Eye posted that he asked to speak to him in private.  Was he upset because he knew that he didn't give that information out and it got leaked.  Was he upset because he knew it was the truth and the truth wasn't suppose to come out.

The truth seems to stir a lot of emotions whether good or bad.

One more note.  I have never seen Kermit be disrespectful towards any poster.

I will say this one last time.  I think Kyle is trying to pull off a SCAM to make money.  I personally do not see Natalee's remains or a shoe in the trap photos.  Does someone have proof that I have not seen that these are Natalee's or (anyone's) remains?  (Besides Kyle's words).  Most posters completely disregarded posters who said the "skull" was too small to be a skull.  If Kermit cracks the case I'll be thrilled for the family, but I haven't seen anything that looks like proof to me yet.  I'm sure they are doing things behind the scenes and that's great.  I can only base my opinion on what I see. 

Regarding Caps, he actually brought forward a witness that passed polygraphs.  I know you have all discounted this witness.  I guess you have your reasons for believing Kermit without any evidence, but not believing Caps.  If your intention was to make the Natalee site feel unwelcome for posters who question the group consensus, you have suceeded.  Good luck to you all.  I'm not wasting any more time here.

I didn't see where I made you unwelcome.   I was stating my opinion just like you were stating yours.

You seem to think Kyle is FOS and that's fine.  We all have different opinions on this subject.

With that said I have a saying I use quite frequently and that is don't let the door hit you in the ass on the way out.  There have been plenty of posters for the past month who have said "I'm done with this place".  Do me a favor and make it permanent.

Now that is a nasty post by San and I stick behind my words.

I've just got to love our SAN.  Great posting and differently no mincing words OR beating around the bush.   ::MonkeyLaugh:: ::MonkeyDance::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #793 1/13/09
Post by: Nut44x4 on January 17, 2009, 09:04:03 PM
Going to go watch 'Without A Trace' ...seems fitting. Night all.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #793 1/13/09
Post by: Blue Moon on January 17, 2009, 09:05:25 PM
Going to go watch 'Without A Trace' ...seems fitting. Night all.

Enjoy.  Good Nite.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #793 1/13/09
Post by: San on January 17, 2009, 09:05:41 PM
You have to ask just how much Jug is clued-in by Beth -- they ARE divorced. I have liked Jug -- but you gotta ask!

lol

I tried that once.  ::MonkeyRoll::

My advice -- DON'T go there  ::MonkeyLaugh::

Sharon, do you know who put Schaffer in touch with the family?
Tim Miller     You going to bash him too?  Why not just let Kermit run the cage if she's so good. You guys are funny, you look at her like she's G-d or something.  Listen to yourselves.

Once again an attack.  You seem to be so pissed off all the time at Kermit.  Is Kermit getting into your head.  Are you consumed about Kermit.  Are you jeolous of Kermit.  Is Kermit stealing your thunder.  What the hell is it that makes you this nuts about Kermit.

A SIMPLE SOLUTION WOULD BE SHOW US THE PROOF.  STOP YOUR ATTACKING.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #793 1/13/09
Post by: KYcat on January 17, 2009, 09:07:09 PM
Going to go watch 'Without A Trace' ...seems fitting. Night all.

Nite Nut



Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #793 1/13/09
Post by: texasmom on January 17, 2009, 09:07:32 PM
Going to go watch 'Without A Trace' ...seems fitting. Night all.

Goodnight Nut!   ::MonkeyCool::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #793 1/13/09
Post by: 2NJSons_Mom on January 17, 2009, 09:09:06 PM
San, sometimes I think you must have known my Dad...that was another one of his favorite sayings.  He meant it when he said it, too.   ::MonkeyHaHa::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #793 1/13/09
Post by: KYcat on January 17, 2009, 09:12:59 PM
I THINK THEY "TOOK THEIR TOYS AND WENT TO PLAY ELSEWHERE"   ::MonkeyHaHa::

Why is it ok for them to have their opinions but because someone else's is different they act like they are offended.  WTH is up with that? 

I have two words for them GROW UP



Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #793 1/13/09
Post by: Blue Moon on January 17, 2009, 09:13:17 PM
San, sometimes I think you must have known my Dad...that was another one of his favorite sayings.  He meant it when he said it, too.   ::MonkeyHaHa::

2NJ, my Mom's (God love her) favorite saying was "I'm as nervous as a whor$ in a church house".  That's how I want Joran, Paulus, Deepak, Satish and Aruba to feel everyday knowing this is not going away and we are still here after 3 1/2 years.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #793 1/13/09
Post by: KYcat on January 17, 2009, 09:15:02 PM
San, sometimes I think you must have known my Dad...that was another one of his favorite sayings.  He meant it when he said it, too.   ::MonkeyHaHa::

2NJ, my Mom's (God love her) favorite saying was "I'm as nervous as a whor$ in a church house".  That's how I want Joran, Paulus, Deepak, Satish and Aruba to feel everyday knowing this is not going away and we are still here after 3 1/2 years.

And "May the fleas of a thousand camels infest their armpits!"

 ::MonkeyDance::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #793 1/13/09
Post by: San on January 17, 2009, 09:16:30 PM
I THINK THEY "TOOK THEIR TOYS AND WENT TO PLAY ELSEWHERE"   ::MonkeyHaHa::

Why is it ok for them to have their opinions but because someone else's is different they act like they are offended.  WTH is up with that? 

I have two words for them GROW UP



They must have skipped kindergarten when they were small and didn't learn to share.  Kermit on the other hand finished kindergarten and shared and shared and shared and shared  ::MonkeyHaHa::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #793 1/13/09
Post by: Anna on January 17, 2009, 09:16:53 PM
You have to ask just how much Jug is clued-in by Beth -- they ARE divorced. I have liked Jug -- but you gotta ask!

lol

I tried that once.  ::MonkeyRoll::

My advice -- DON'T go there  ::MonkeyLaugh::

Sharon, do you know who put Schaffer in touch with the family?
Tim Miller     You going to bash him too?  Why not just let Kermit run the cage if she's so good. You guys are funny, you look at her like she's G-d or something.  Listen to yourselves.


(http://i15.photobucket.com/albums/a360/AnnaBlueSkies/3b52712e.jpg)


I'm still waiting for proof or an apology for that whopping lie you told about me contacting the FBI about Lala's.  Never even thought about doing that.  Just put up or shut up on that one.  At least I am not stupid enough to think they would even be remotely interested.



Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #793 1/13/09
Post by: KYcat on January 17, 2009, 09:18:36 PM
I THINK THEY "TOOK THEIR TOYS AND WENT TO PLAY ELSEWHERE"   ::MonkeyHaHa::

Why is it ok for them to have their opinions but because someone else's is different they act like they are offended.  WTH is up with that? 

I have two words for them GROW UP



They must have skipped kindergarten when they were small and didn't learn to share.  Kermit on the other hand finished kindergarten and shared and shared and shared and shared  ::MonkeyHaHa::

And GOD BLESS HER for that!



Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #793 1/13/09
Post by: KYcat on January 17, 2009, 09:20:14 PM
You have to ask just how much Jug is clued-in by Beth -- they ARE divorced. I have liked Jug -- but you gotta ask!

lol

I tried that once.  ::MonkeyRoll::

My advice -- DON'T go there  ::MonkeyLaugh::

Sharon, do you know who put Schaffer in touch with the family?
Tim Miller     You going to bash him too?  Why not just let Kermit run the cage if she's so good. You guys are funny, you look at her like she's G-d or something.  Listen to yourselves.


(http://i15.photobucket.com/albums/a360/AnnaBlueSkies/3b52712e.jpg)


I'm still waiting for proof or an apology for that whopping lie you told about me contacting the FBI about Lala's.  Never even thought about doing that.  Just put up or shut up on that one.  At least I am not stupid enough to think they would even be remotely interested.



Anna, don't worry 'bout it......Consider the source.  We know better......... it's called using your head for something other than a hat rack!

 ::MonkeyTongue::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #793 1/13/09
Post by: Anna on January 17, 2009, 09:26:35 PM
And I never tried to deceive Dave Holloway about anything ever in my life, either.

It's one thing to lie about events or state opinions but to be flat out lying about another poster is totally uncalled for and over the top.

Dave is more than capable of verifying anything I have ever addressed to him.  He knows whether or not I was lying to him and he didn't seem to think so at the time.  Only a couple of people seemed to take exception to what I posted and perhaps that's because they have some sort of agenda that didn't jive with what I said.

And I have probably not addressed more than ten posts to the person who last attacked me in all the time I have been here.  That would be HotShot.

There are those who knew about this at the time and some even saw verification.

Talk about bashing!  What's that all about?  Agree with me or you get attacked?  I am really weary of that approach.

I am not even convinced that it was Natalee in that trap in the first place but Kyle surely is the one who kept insisting that it was.  Guess that makes this his conspiracy theory instead of the monkeys.





Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #793 1/13/09
Post by: KYcat on January 17, 2009, 09:30:18 PM
I hate to leave good company....but I am going to go spend some time with my hubby. 

Hang in there Monkeys

Good Nite All



Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #793 1/13/09
Post by: San on January 17, 2009, 09:31:58 PM
I hate to leave good company....but I am going to go spend some time with my hubby. 

Hang in there Monkeys

Good Nite All


Goodnight KYcat.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #793 1/13/09
Post by: MuffyBee on January 17, 2009, 09:32:59 PM
I hate to leave good company....but I am going to go spend some time with my hubby. 

Hang in there Monkeys

Good Nite All



Good night KYcat  (http://bestsmileys.com/sleeping/11.gif)


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #793 1/13/09
Post by: texasmom on January 17, 2009, 09:33:37 PM
I hate to leave good company....but I am going to go spend some time with my hubby. 

Hang in there Monkeys

Good Nite All



Goodnight KYcat!   ::MonkeyCool::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #793 1/13/09
Post by: Anna on January 17, 2009, 09:38:00 PM
I tend to be an independent thinker and maybe not the best team player because of that.  But I never think something just because another person says it.  It has to make sense to me.  I come to my own conclusions based on what information is available to me.  Someone saying something is not enough to sway me one way or the other but in this instance, it is Kyle who posted all those things.

And I do believe PI is a family member although I did not for a long time.  He doesn't sound like a Reynolds to me, lol.  Well, others seem to know for a fact that he is family and several say that so they know more about that than I do.  He said basically the same thing about those baggies being only available to ALE so is that not confirmation that "the family" knows all about this and apparently knew before we  did?


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #793 1/13/09
Post by: wreck on January 17, 2009, 09:41:11 PM
I am more than willing to listen to anyone's opinion or theory. All I see is people telling me I'm WRONG -- but with NO reason WHY I'm wrong. Give me some SUBSTANCE.
Yes, my OPINION (since early on this past year) was that Natalee was in that cage. Do I rant and rave that it was definitely so? Absolutely not. I STILL don't know if she was in that cage -- but I believe so now more than I did in February. Why? Because I see the lengths being put on to divert away from it. If you have TRULY considered
EVERYTHING Kermit has DOCUMENTED. I don't think you could possibly criticize those of us who believe no less than a cover-up or malfeasance was involved here. It still might not mean it was Natalee -- but no way can you deny Kermit has provided legitimate concerns about the integrity of the Persistence.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #793 1/13/09
Post by: Blue Moon on January 17, 2009, 09:45:12 PM
I hate to leave good company....but I am going to go spend some time with my hubby. 

Hang in there Monkeys

Good Nite All



Good nite fellow Kentuckian.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #793 1/13/09
Post by: wreck on January 17, 2009, 09:46:02 PM
I tend to be an independent thinker and maybe not the best team player because of that.  But I never think something just because another person says it.  It has to make sense to me.  I come to my own conclusions based on what information is available to me.  Someone saying something is not enough to sway me one way or the other but in this instance, it is Kyle who posted all those things.

And I do believe PI is a family member although I did not for a long time.  He doesn't sound like a Reynolds to me, lol.  Well, others seem to know for a fact that he is family and several say that so they know more about that than I do.  He said basically the same thing about those baggies being only available to ALE so is that not confirmation that "the family" knows all about this and apparently knew before we  did?
Anna, either Kermit, Jen, or Tamikosmom can provide the timeline better; but, PI did not find out about the Jan. 7th pics until March.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #793 1/13/09
Post by: San on January 17, 2009, 09:50:04 PM
I tend to be an independent thinker and maybe not the best team player because of that.  But I never think something just because another person says it.  It has to make sense to me.  I come to my own conclusions based on what information is available to me.  Someone saying something is not enough to sway me one way or the other but in this instance, it is Kyle who posted all those things.

And I do believe PI is a family member although I did not for a long time.  He doesn't sound like a Reynolds to me, lol.  Well, others seem to know for a fact that he is family and several say that so they know more about that than I do.  He said basically the same thing about those baggies being only available to ALE so is that not confirmation that "the family" knows all about this and apparently knew before we  did?
Anna, either Kermit, Jen, or Tamikosmom can provide the timeline better; but, PI did not find out about the Jan. 7th pics until March.

And when PI mentioned something Kyle got his panties in a wad.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #793 1/13/09
Post by: Anna on January 17, 2009, 09:53:09 PM
I tend to be an independent thinker and maybe not the best team player because of that.  But I never think something just because another person says it.  It has to make sense to me.  I come to my own conclusions based on what information is available to me.  Someone saying something is not enough to sway me one way or the other but in this instance, it is Kyle who posted all those things.

And I do believe PI is a family member although I did not for a long time.  He doesn't sound like a Reynolds to me, lol.  Well, others seem to know for a fact that he is family and several say that so they know more about that than I do.  He said basically the same thing about those baggies being only available to ALE so is that not confirmation that "the family" knows all about this and apparently knew before we  did?
Anna, either Kermit, Jen, or Tamikosmom can provide the timeline better; but, PI did not find out about the Jan. 7th pics until March.


But most of us didn't find out about only ALE having access to the contents of the trap until recently.  He knew that before we did.  If it was posted and I read that ALE made the dive from and returned to their own boat, it was lost on this poster.  I just didn't think that deeply about it at the time.  The ramifications of that happening were just lost on me until brought to my attention.



Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #793 1/13/09
Post by: wreck on January 17, 2009, 09:56:18 PM
I tend to be an independent thinker and maybe not the best team player because of that.  But I never think something just because another person says it.  It has to make sense to me.  I come to my own conclusions based on what information is available to me.  Someone saying something is not enough to sway me one way or the other but in this instance, it is Kyle who posted all those things.

And I do believe PI is a family member although I did not for a long time.  He doesn't sound like a Reynolds to me, lol.  Well, others seem to know for a fact that he is family and several say that so they know more about that than I do.  He said basically the same thing about those baggies being only available to ALE so is that not confirmation that "the family" knows all about this and apparently knew before we  did?
Anna, either Kermit, Jen, or Tamikosmom can provide the timeline better; but, PI did not find out about the Jan. 7th pics until March.


But most of us didn't find out about only ALE having access to the contents of the trap until recently.  He knew that before we did.  If it was posted and I read that ALE made the dive from and returned to their own boat, it was lost on this poster.  I just didn't think that deeply about it at the time.  The ramifications of that happening were just lost on me until brought to my attention.


I see what you are saying -- yes, I agree!


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #793 1/13/09
Post by: Anna on January 17, 2009, 09:57:03 PM
I do remember and believe there was even some discussion of why map out so many targets and use every cent doing that instead of mapping out say the top fifty only and getting a dive done on those with the funds available. 


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #793 1/13/09
Post by: wreck on January 17, 2009, 10:10:30 PM
I do remember and believe there was even some discussion of why map out so many targets and use every cent doing that instead of mapping out say the top fifty only and getting a dive done on those with the funds available. 
As Red has pointed out -- the Persistence had no "Exit Strategy" -- just a quick exit.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #793 1/13/09
Post by: Magnolia on January 17, 2009, 10:27:13 PM
I think that we all knew, down deep, that there was something
wonky with the Persistence search.  The sudden departure, no
mention of returning to check on the other targets, Robin posting
the pictures.  Something just wasn't right.
Kermit's revelations brought it all into focus.
Kyle's only rebuttal was his lame letter at BFN which sounded like
doublespeak and his email to Klaas where he said that his words
were all taken out of context.
Several members of the Freebirds have stated that his words were
not taken out of context and were exactly what they seemed.
But we still get these people coming here to tell us how dumb
we are for believing Kermit.
What is not to believe?  Kermit is one fine and brave frog to have
revealed all of this information.
Natalee's family is aware of it all.
Anyone that still believes CapsLockWizzard is just deluisional. IMO


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #793 1/13/09
Post by: San on January 17, 2009, 10:38:14 PM
I think that we all knew, down deep, that there was something
wonky with the Persistence search.  The sudden departure, no
mention of returning to check on the other targets, Robin posting
the pictures.  Something just wasn't right.
Kermit's revelations brought it all into focus.
Kyle's only rebuttal was his lame letter at BFN which sounded like
doublespeak and his email to Klaas where he said that his words
were all taken out of context.
Several members of the Freebirds have stated that his words were
not taken out of context and were exactly what they seemed.
But we still get these people coming here to tell us how dumb
we are for believing Kermit.
What is not to believe?  Kermit is one fine and brave frog to have
revealed all of this information.
Natalee's family is aware of it all.
Anyone that still believes CapsLockWizzard is just deluisional. IMO

Nicely said Magnolia.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #793 1/13/09
Post by: Blue Moon on January 17, 2009, 10:55:24 PM
I think I will call it a night.  Been a long day.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #793 1/13/09
Post by: San on January 17, 2009, 10:59:50 PM
I think I will call it a night.  Been a long day.

Goodnight Blue Moon


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #793 1/13/09
Post by: Helen Back on January 17, 2009, 11:22:42 PM
Good evening monkeys,

I have to jump in here and say I don't see what the question is......Kyle's words stand as they are, unless he refutes. 

By his own admission, executives at several networks were privy to images and information before Natalee's parents.  There's no way you can explain that to make it OK. ::MonkeyNoNo::

The day PI posted about the fabric, and Kyle got upset, we all knew something had gone very wrong.

At the time the Persistence was searching and Kyle posted that they had a good relationship with ALE, working together, and the team was all new, I think most of our antennas went into deep space. 
 ::MonkeyShocked::

Later, we saw the photos from the ship, Dolph Richardson and Hans Mos, part of the all new team???  It was sickening to learn that ALE had collected everything and sped away.

Whether there were human remains or not, whether it was Natalee or not, none of this was handled with integrity as far as Natalee and her family are concerned.  The rest of it just makes it so much worse.

I've looked at Kyles' words many times.  I can't imagine a context you could put them into that would make it sound better.....they are damaging in any context.  The CONTEXT is not the problem.

But I am willing to listen.







Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #793 1/13/09
Post by: Keepthefaith on January 17, 2009, 11:24:39 PM
I think that we all knew, down deep, that there was something
wonky with the Persistence search.  The sudden departure, no
mention of returning to check on the other targets, Robin posting
the pictures.  Something just wasn't right.
Kermit's revelations brought it all into focus.
Kyle's only rebuttal was his lame letter at BFN which sounded like
doublespeak and his email to Klaas where he said that his words
were all taken out of context.
Several members of the Freebirds have stated that his words were
not taken out of context and were exactly what they seemed.
But we still get these people coming here to tell us how dumb
we are for believing Kermit.
What is not to believe?  Kermit is one fine and brave frog to have
revealed all of this information.
Natalee's family is aware of it all.
Anyone that still believes CapsLockWizzard is just deluisional. IMO

 ::MonkeyDance:: ::MonkeyDance:: ::MonkeyDance:: ::MonkeyDance::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #793 1/13/09
Post by: Keepthefaith on January 17, 2009, 11:25:32 PM
Everyone that says there not coming back.Come back! ::MonkeyLaugh::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #793 1/13/09
Post by: San on January 17, 2009, 11:26:34 PM
Good evening monkeys,

I have to jump in here and say I don't see what the question is......Kyle's words stand as they are, unless he refutes. 

By his own admission, executives at several networks were privy to images and information before Natalee's parents.  There's no way you can explain that to make it OK. ::MonkeyNoNo::

The day PI posted about the fabric, and Kyle got upset, we all knew something had gone very wrong.

At the time the Persistence was searching and Kyle posted that they had a good relationship with ALE, working together, and the team was all new, I think most of our antennas went into deep space. 
 ::MonkeyShocked::

Later, we saw the photos from the ship, Dolph Richardson and Hans Mos, part of the all new team???  It was sickening to learn that ALE had collected everything and sped away.

Whether there were human remains or not, whether it was Natalee or not, none of this was handled with integrity as far as Natalee and her family are concerned.  The rest of it just makes it so much worse.

I've looked at Kyles' words many times.  I can't imagine a context you could put them into that would make it sound better.....they are damaging in any context.  The CONTEXT is not the problem.

But I am willing to listen.



I agree Helen.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #793 1/13/09
Post by: Keepthefaith on January 17, 2009, 11:26:46 PM
Everyone that says there not coming back.Come back! ::MonkeyLaugh::

They know SCARED MONKEY'S RULES.. ::MonkeyDance:: ::MonkeyDance::

The Hidey Hole program isn't working! ::MonkeyDance::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #793 1/13/09
Post by: San on January 17, 2009, 11:27:10 PM
Everyone that says there not coming back.Come back! ::MonkeyLaugh::

 ::MonkeyHaHa::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #793 1/13/09
Post by: Keepthefaith on January 17, 2009, 11:30:24 PM
Everyone that says there not coming back.Come back! ::MonkeyLaugh::

 ::MonkeyHaHa::

There's more coming from Kermit hidey-hole people so put on your seat-belt!


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #793 1/13/09
Post by: hotping on January 17, 2009, 11:30:36 PM
Everyone that says there not coming back.Come back! ::MonkeyLaugh::
KTF You forgot to say PLEASE...lol  ::MonkeyHaHa::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #793 1/13/09
Post by: hotping on January 17, 2009, 11:31:34 PM
Everyone that says there not coming back.Come back! ::MonkeyLaugh::

 ::MonkeyHaHa::

There's more coming from Kermit hidey-hole people so put on your seat-belt!
  ::MonkeyHaHa::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #793 1/13/09
Post by: 2NJSons_Mom on January 17, 2009, 11:32:41 PM
Been thinking about OE's activities following the end of the search for Natalee.  I pulled what I could, here.  The dates are not necessarily in order, but I noticed he did attend some sort of safety class prior to or after the Norway trip...I would think prior, as a guess.

******

TUESDAY, AUGUST 12, 2008
Current Project: Cairo Egypt, Multiple Site Surveys, Pipeline Prelays
Performing multiple site surveys and large pipeline prelay surveys in the Mediterranean Sea, offshore Egypt. Performing office based geo-QC of data, processing, analysis, and reporting.
Posted by Kyle Kingman at 1:15 PM 0 comments   
TUESDAY, JULY 15, 2008
Ormen Lange Excavation -North Sea, Norway
Ormen Lange deep sea pipeline excavation monitoring with Oceaneering Magnum ROV and high-resolution multibeam sonar. StatoilHydro, AGR Drilling, Fugro Norway
Posted by Kyle Kingman at 4:43 PM 0 comments   
SATURDAY, MAY 3, 2008
Gulf of Mexico site surveys
- Acquisition, processing, and analysis of geophysical data collected during multiple site surveys in the Gulf of Mexico based in Lafayette, Louisiana. Innovative total field and residual field magnetic anomaly analysis is applied along with side scan sonar and shallow seismic analysis over multiple projects for energy clients for future infrastructure. Magnetic data is reduced and processed to strip out unwanted noise due to sensor motion, vessel artifacts, regional and local field anomaly, magnetic 'weather', and diurnal effects. A georeferenced scalable magnetic anomaly residual map is created for each field showing the smallest detectable anomalies as well as accurate position of buried pipelines, wells, cables, debris, and targets of possible archaeological interest.
Posted by Kyle Kingman at 6:32 PM 0 comments   
THURSDAY, NOVEMBER 29, 2007
Search for Natalee Holloway Dec 2007-Present
Field Project Manager, Geophysical Engineer and Marine Geologist on board the R/V Persistence. Responsible for side scan sonar acquisition, digital processing, analysis, and target identification and location. I will assist in side scan sonar operation and guide the ROV (remotely operated vehicle) team to each sonar target after I pick and analyse each sonar target. For more info: http://nholloway.blogspot.com/

This project is currently temporarily suspended due to funding constraints and other factors.
Posted by Kyle Kingman at 6:15 PM 3 comments   

http://www.geosolutions.blogspot.com/



Miscellaneous
- BOSIET+OLF Offshore Sea Survival Training, +HUET training, UKOOA Medical +OLF, July-08-Graduated with Honors in Geology
- Awarded Rutgers Undergraduate Research Fellow
- President of the Rutgers Geology Club
- Awarded Rutgers Graduate Assistantship Research Funding, Full Scholarship

http://www.geosolutions.blogspot.com/


·   
Senior Geophysical Operations Manager
Alpine Ocean Seismic Survey Inc.
(Oil & Energy industry)
October 2008 — Present (4 months)
http://www.linkedin.com/pub/b/65/464

************

When was his daughter born?  Sometime in the summer, iirc...couldn't find it. 

Was the info Kyle compiled at FB sent in the fall of '08?  Just looking at the start date of new position/new company, etc.  I think I read that he met with Silvetti in July, '08....

It might not mean anything but they were details that I was looking at yesterday and came to mind today while reading posts.




Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #793 1/13/09
Post by: Keepthefaith on January 17, 2009, 11:34:23 PM
You have to ask just how much Jug is clued-in by Beth -- they ARE divorced. I have liked Jug -- but you gotta ask!

lol

I tried that once.  ::MonkeyRoll::

My advice -- DON'T go there  ::MonkeyLaugh::

Sharon, do you know who put Schaffer in touch with the family?
Tim Miller     You going to bash him too?  Why not just let Kermit run the cage if she's so good. You guys are funny, you look at her like she's G-d or something.  Listen to yourselves.

HotShot.Can you ask CapsLockWizard when the arrest of the MAJOR player is gonna happen?It was supposed to happen about a week and a half ago.I figured he might have gotten busy and forgot to let us know!TIA ::MonkeyCool::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #793 1/13/09
Post by: Anna on January 17, 2009, 11:38:04 PM
And if Mos is "out" and fired, why is he still making press conferences?


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #793 1/13/09
Post by: Keepthefaith on January 17, 2009, 11:38:12 PM
Everyone that says there not coming back.Come back! ::MonkeyLaugh::
KTF You forgot to say PLEASE...lol  ::MonkeyHaHa::

Went out to the daughter's B-Ball game and then some pizza and missed the playground tantrum!No.I'm not bashing.Just call it how i see it! ::MonkeyTongue::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #793 1/13/09
Post by: hotping on January 17, 2009, 11:42:49 PM
Everyone that says there not coming back.Come back! ::MonkeyLaugh::
KTF You forgot to say PLEASE...lol  ::MonkeyHaHa::

Went out to the daughter's B-Ball game and then some pizza and missed the playground tantrum!No.I'm not bashing.Just call it how i see it! ::MonkeyTongue::
::MonkeyWink::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #793 1/13/09
Post by: Keepthefaith on January 17, 2009, 11:55:48 PM
naysayers, doubters and disbelievers, or just questions one may have,

ask yourself

Why would Kyle, with the agreement of Louis Schafer and Tim Tehran, fly home to the U.S. and try to sell the ROV/videos of the trap to the U.S. media and Peter deVries? If it's just rocks or someone else's body then it is supervelous isn't it for Kyle to have gone to all that trouble?

Why would Kyle and John Silvetti NOT contact the family directly and give them what they saw and tell them everything that went on?

If John Silvetti is above reproach, then why did he go back to Aruba to set up an office to do business with South America? Why did John Silvetti merge his GeoLab company with a DUTCH company?

If John Silvetti is above reproach, then why did he remove all things Holloway from the boat upon it's return
and not contact the family immediately to go over the important things that were discovered? Oh yes, because
he mapped the ocean floor for oil. Jug Twitty knew John Silvetti was an OIL GUY!

If John Silvetti is above reproach, then why did he turn away and allow ONLY ARUBAN DIVERS TO RETRIEVE EVIDENCE FROM THE CAGE/TRAP? It was only because the ROV was still filming that Kyle was able to take screen shots of that dive! Not because of John Silvetti's protection of evidence.

Beth gave me permission to expose the Aruban cover-up. AND other family members know that Beth did indeed give me that permission. The other freebirds know this to be true, they have all seen the emails.







BUMP ::MonkeyCool::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #793 1/13/09
Post by: klaasend on January 18, 2009, 12:15:04 AM
Good evening monkeys,

I have to jump in here and say I don't see what the question is......Kyle's words stand as they are, unless he refutes. 

By his own admission, executives at several networks were privy to images and information before Natalee's parents.  There's no way you can explain that to make it OK. ::MonkeyNoNo::

The day PI posted about the fabric, and Kyle got upset, we all knew something had gone very wrong.

At the time the Persistence was searching and Kyle posted that they had a good relationship with ALE, working together, and the team was all new, I think most of our antennas went into deep space. 
 ::MonkeyShocked::

Later, we saw the photos from the ship, Dolph Richardson and Hans Mos, part of the all new team???  It was sickening to learn that ALE had collected everything and sped away.

Whether there were human remains or not, whether it was Natalee or not, none of this was handled with integrity as far as Natalee and her family are concerned.  The rest of it just makes it so much worse.

I've looked at Kyles' words many times.  I can't imagine a context you could put them into that would make it sound better.....they are damaging in any context.  The CONTEXT is not the problem.

But I am willing to listen.







I agree


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #793 1/13/09
Post by: Anna on January 18, 2009, 12:20:54 AM
And I am sure Natalee's family appreciates all that everyone including the crew of the Persistence have done to help finding Natalee.  It's just so unfortunate that in the end, ALE was allowed exclusive access to the contents of the trap.  It's like doing all that work then just throwing it away.

I can't believe Natalee's family would advise that this be done with the contents of the trap after what they had all experienced in the past.



Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #793 1/13/09
Post by: Anna on January 18, 2009, 12:32:19 AM
Remember when even the Prime Minister announced that there was blood in Deepak's car?  Then next thing we know, it has turned into chocolate and finally ended up as cleaning fluid.  Things like that are why a second opinion is always needed.  If ALE was being so cooperative, why didn't they just invite others to participate in the retrieval from the trap.  Maybe the FBI agent we have been told was onboard would have been a good one to include for example.  Unless of course they were up to something again.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #793 1/13/09
Post by: Keepthefaith on January 18, 2009, 12:50:43 AM
And to all a good night.Icehawk, rjdeer, texasmom, Chata, hotping

JUSTICE FOR NATALEE
   JUSTICE FOR NATALEE
      JUSTICE FOR NATALEE
         JUSTICE FOR NATALEE
            JUSTICE FOR NATALEE
               JUSTICE FOR NATALEE
                  JUSTICE FOR NATALEE!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #793 1/13/09
Post by: hotping on January 18, 2009, 12:53:49 AM
And to all a good night.Icehawk, rjdeer, texasmom, Chata, hotping

JUSTICE FOR NATALEE
   JUSTICE FOR NATALEE
      JUSTICE FOR NATALEE
         JUSTICE FOR NATALEE
            JUSTICE FOR NATALEE
               JUSTICE FOR NATALEE
                  JUSTICE FOR NATALEE!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Good Night KTF! Enjoy the rest of Your weekend!  ::MonkeyCool::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #793 1/13/09
Post by: Tamikosmom on January 18, 2009, 12:57:14 AM

<snipped>

When was his daughter born?  Sometime in the summer, iirc...couldn't find it. 

<snipped>


Klaasend
Re: Natalee Case Discussion #756 6/5 -
« Reply #240 on: June 06, 2008, 12:55:57 PM »


http://scaredmonkeys.net/index.php?topic=2890.msg387399#msg387399



Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #793 1/13/09
Post by: texasmom on January 18, 2009, 02:26:14 AM
(http://i21.photobucket.com/albums/b258/texasmom55/CarpePicNatalee1.png)

JUSTICE FOR NATALEE!!!!


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #793 1/13/09
Post by: sharon on January 18, 2009, 08:00:34 AM

{snipped}

I am not even convinced that it was Natalee in that trap in the first place but Kyle surely is the one who kept insisting that it was.  Guess that makes this his conspiracy theory instead of the monkeys.




Anna -- that is EXACTLY how I felt.

I was disappointed, but believed what we had been told -- it was NOT Natalee in the trap.

And YES -- Kyle's own words -- his professional opinion and the proof he described FIRST HAND -- are what changed my mind.

If he 'made it all up' he has had many opportunities to make that right. Pretty easy, right? I notice he has not  ::MonkeyWink::

.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #793 1/13/09
Post by: San on January 18, 2009, 08:07:53 AM

{snipped}

I am not even convinced that it was Natalee in that trap in the first place but Kyle surely is the one who kept insisting that it was.  Guess that makes this his conspiracy theory instead of the monkeys.




Anna -- that is EXACTLY how I felt.

I was disappointed, but believed what we had been told -- it was NOT Natalee in the trap.

And YES -- Kyle's own words -- his professional opinion and the proof he described FIRST HAND -- are what changed my mind.

If he 'made it all up' he has had many opportunities to make that right. Pretty easy, right? I notice he has not  ::MonkeyWink::
.

But now for me if he said I made it up I would have my doubts.  I need to see the entire video of what he saw.  Maybe I missed it but have we ever seen the video of the divers going into the trap and retrieving those bags.  Will he say he made it up to cover his ass.  I just don't know anymore.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #793 1/13/09
Post by: sharon on January 18, 2009, 08:18:30 AM
Good evening monkeys,

I have to jump in here and say I don't see what the question is......Kyle's words stand as they are, unless he refutes. 

(snipped)

I've looked at Kyles' words many times.  I can't imagine a context you could put them into that would make it sound better.....they are damaging in any context.  The CONTEXT is not the problem.

But I am willing to listen.



That is so true, HelenBack.

Everytime someone posts a 'context' argument, I'm reminded of when I was told that I had to play the Beatles album backwards to find the 'hidden message'  ::MonkeyTongue:: ::MonkeyTongue::

The SAME questions you are all asking now, are the SAME questions we were asking then. And you're seeing the answers, explanations, worries and rationales. From someone that was onboard the Persistence FIRST HAND.

I think Tina Turner said it best when she sang ''What's context got to do with it??"

(yes, my humour is usually only appreciated by me  ::MonkeyHaHa:: )



Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #793 1/13/09
Post by: sharon on January 18, 2009, 08:23:11 AM

{snipped}

I am not even convinced that it was Natalee in that trap in the first place but Kyle surely is the one who kept insisting that it was.  Guess that makes this his conspiracy theory instead of the monkeys.




Anna -- that is EXACTLY how I felt.

I was disappointed, but believed what we had been told -- it was NOT Natalee in the trap.

And YES -- Kyle's own words -- his professional opinion and the proof he described FIRST HAND -- are what changed my mind.

If he 'made it all up' he has had many opportunities to make that right. Pretty easy, right? I notice he has not  ::MonkeyWink::
.

But now for me if he said I made it up I would have my doubts.  I need to see the entire video of what he saw.  Maybe I missed it but have we ever seen the video of the divers going into the trap and retrieving those bags.  Will he say he made it up to cover his ass.  I just don't know anymore.

You're right, San.

Almost as if he graduated from Joran of the Ditch college of 'lie, lie, lie and no one will ever be able to tell if you are EVER telling the truth'?
.



Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #793 1/13/09
Post by: KYcat on January 18, 2009, 08:41:59 AM

{snipped}

I am not even convinced that it was Natalee in that trap in the first place but Kyle surely is the one who kept insisting that it was.  Guess that makes this his conspiracy theory instead of the monkeys.




Anna -- that is EXACTLY how I felt.

I was disappointed, but believed what we had been told -- it was NOT Natalee in the trap.

And YES -- Kyle's own words -- his professional opinion and the proof he described FIRST HAND -- are what changed my mind.

If he 'made it all up' he has had many opportunities to make that right. Pretty easy, right? I notice he has not  ::MonkeyWink::
.

But now for me if he said I made it up I would have my doubts.  I need to see the entire video of what he saw.  Maybe I missed it but have we ever seen the video of the divers going into the trap and retrieving those bags.  Will he say he made it up to cover his ass.  I just don't know anymore.

There is no justification for Kyle to have made it up.  IMO, if he did, then it puts him in even more of a bad light.  He cannot cover his ass and that is why he won't comment anymore.  Damage is done. 

Remember what PI said......
PRIVATE EYE - IN HIS OWN WORDS

private eye
Re: Natalee Case Discussion #746 4/4
« Reply #499 on: April 09, 2008, 12:39:50 AM »

If I understood Kyle correctly, and that would be that the Arubans retrieved and possessed all finds, not sharing anything with the crew, then that effort was a waste of time and effort. The only thing it could have accomplished was to locate additional evidence for the Arubans to destroy.  The effort was superb, but the game was fixed.

http://scaredmonkeys.net/index.php?topic=2769.msg372245;topicseen#msg372245


private eye
Re: Natalee Case Discussion #742 3/10 -
« Reply #686 on: March 13, 2008, 06:38:07 PM »

But sharing information with people who work for people who are directly orchestrating the cover up, Rudy, or the Dutch, is the most irresponsible investigating I can imagine. What kills this investigation is people having to come into it, wanting to apply basic investigatory protocols into place, and then having those channels sabotage the new evidence that the new players discover. Of course, as is happened everytime in this case, the new people eventually come to a point where the manipulation of the evidence is undeniable, but by then the fruits of their work are gone, and there is simply another member of the believers of the cover up group. What I pray that Kyle and the crew of the Persistence will determine, is that  regardless of how hard working the man that they are working with appears to work, his work belongs to Rudy, and Rudy belongs to the local dutch.

We are not hysterical, ignorant, paranoid people. We have seen the cover up in action, in broad daylight, with impunity, and if you disregard our warnings, you will become the next chump in a series of chumps, no matter how sophisticated your equipment, the level of your educational achievement, or the extent of your job skills and work history.

http://scaredmonkeys.net/index.php?topic=2689.msg364750#msg364750

Kudos to Janet  I pulled from a previous post of hers.

I will never forget PI's words. 

 ::MonkeyNoNo::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #793 1/13/09
Post by: KYcat on January 18, 2009, 08:57:45 AM
And another thing......  ::MonkeyHaHa::

WHY do people come here and try to CHANGE our opinions?  As far as I know, we don't all completely agree on everything, but we state our opinions and we are trying to get to the truth.  And we do it RESPECTFULLY. 

I think they PROTEST too much!!!!!!!

 ::MonkeyEek::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #793 1/13/09
Post by: San on January 18, 2009, 10:37:08 AM
And another thing......  ::MonkeyHaHa::

WHY do people come here and try to CHANGE our opinions?  As far as I know, we don't all completely agree on everything, but we state our opinions and we are trying to get to the truth.  And we do it RESPECTFULLY. 

I think they PROTEST too much!!!!!!!

 ::MonkeyEek::


I agree.

Is it because they believe what they have seen and read to be the truth and when we don't agree they get mad.  I am not saying I verbally say I disagree with what they write.  But when we post stuff like "I stand with the frog" it makes them angry.  I read what they post and I form an opinion as to who I think is telling the truth about what happened.  Now am I going to sit here and say gee I better agree with them because they will be mad and attack me for agreeing with Kermit.

This makes no sense to me.  They can't force me to believe in what they write.

Right now we know that Natalee was kidnapped by Joran Van der Sloot, Deepak & Satish Kalpoe and was never seen alive again.  The prosecutor Karin Janssen has said they have evidence of a murder.  Jan Van der Straaten has said he doesn't believe Natalee is alive.  Paulus Van der Sloot is sitting next to Natalee at the casino and was charged with premeditated murder.  These are facts.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #793 1/13/09
Post by: sharon on January 18, 2009, 10:44:00 AM
Most of it has nothing to do with believing the brave frog. But I am overjoyed that my green friend has received so much support and encouraging words.

It's whether or not you believe Kyle. Those are HIS words.

Kermit wanted to make sure that you all read them, too. And this was the only option remaining.

I was not brave enough to do the same thing kermit did :-(

But I stand with the frog. And the girl. And the Monkeys.

sigh



Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #793 1/13/09
Post by: San on January 18, 2009, 10:49:00 AM
Most of it has nothing to do with believing the brave frog. But I am overjoyed that my green friend has received so much support and encouraging words.

It's whether or not you believe Kyle. Those are HIS words.

Kermit wanted to make sure that you all read them, too. And this was the only option remaining.

I was not brave enough to do the same thing kermit did :-(

But I stand with the frog. And the girl. And the Monkeys.

sigh



I agree Sharon.  But the attacks have been made because we believe the green frog.  We have compared Kyle's words and have made a decision.  They don't like that we have made this decision because it differs from theirs.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #793 1/13/09
Post by: Tamikosmom on January 18, 2009, 10:53:29 AM
GOOD MORNING MONKEYS!!  GOOD MORNING ZOOKEEPERS!!

Keepthefaith ... the fog finally lifted in the Fraser Valley of British Columbia ... not a cloud in the sky.  The sun has risen.  What a beautiful morning!!!  How about Seattle?

 ::cartwheel::

Janet
7:55 AM PT





Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #793 1/13/09
Post by: sharon on January 18, 2009, 10:55:01 AM
Most of it has nothing to do with believing the brave frog. But I am overjoyed that my green friend has received so much support and encouraging words.

It's whether or not you believe Kyle. Those are HIS words.

Kermit wanted to make sure that you all read them, too. And this was the only option remaining.

I was not brave enough to do the same thing kermit did :-(

But I stand with the frog. And the girl. And the Monkeys.

sigh



I agree Sharon.  But the attacks have been made because we believe the green frog.  We have compared Kyle's words and have made a decision.  They don't like that we have made this decision because it differs from theirs.

San, I agree. Even though we all want the same result. Justice for Natalee.

That is the part that boggles the mind.

Different 'theories' and approaches, maybe -- but the goal is the same.

Is being 'right' that damn important to some? It's supposed to be about Natalee.






Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #793 1/13/09
Post by: texasmom on January 18, 2009, 10:58:19 AM
Good morning monkeys! 

I agree with KYcat and San.

What really irks me about all of the ones that want to discredit Kermit is that NONE of them have posted one single thing that we can even consider as a fact to support their rantings.  And I am really disappointed in some of the "bashing" certain ones are choosing to do about everyone here.  It only makes them look silly imo. 

And I also agree with Sharon about "context", I appreciated her humour about that one....I got really sick of that word a long time ago.  Not that context never matters but in 99.9% of Kyle's posts that have been posted here, it doesn't!  I said 99.9% because one actually provoked a thought when I saw the context, but I don't even remember which one it was now; so considering everything...it didn't really matter.  Have I confused everyone now?

  ::MonkeyHaHa::

I stand with the girl, the monkeys, and the frog.   ::MonkeyDance::

Justice for Natalee!!!!!!


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #793 1/13/09
Post by: texasmom on January 18, 2009, 10:59:48 AM
GOOD MORNING MONKEYS!!  GOOD MORNING ZOOKEEPERS!!

Keepthefaith ... the fog finally lifted in the Fraser Valley of British Columbia ... not a cloud in the sky.  The sun has risen.  What a beautiful morning!!!  How about Seattle?

 ::cartwheel::

Janet
7:55 AM PT


Good morning Janet! 


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #793 1/13/09
Post by: texasmom on January 18, 2009, 11:05:38 AM
Clyde Burke

1/2/2009 Soul City
(http://www.coolaruba.com/gallery/main.php?g2_view=core.DownloadItem&g2_itemId=644060&g2_serialNumber=3&g2_GALLERYSID=0d7520c7b4c5fcff8a19ca9ffe62d712)

(http://www.coolaruba.com/gallery/main.php?g2_view=core.DownloadItem&g2_itemId=643415&g2_serialNumber=3&g2_GALLERYSID=0d7520c7b4c5fcff8a19ca9ffe62d712)

Band 2Sweet

(http://i21.photobucket.com/albums/b258/texasmom55/Clyde%20Burke/CBurke2Sweet_1.jpg)


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #793 1/13/09
Post by: San on January 18, 2009, 11:07:05 AM
Most of it has nothing to do with believing the brave frog. But I am overjoyed that my green friend has received so much support and encouraging words.

It's whether or not you believe Kyle. Those are HIS words.

Kermit wanted to make sure that you all read them, too. And this was the only option remaining.

I was not brave enough to do the same thing kermit did :-(

But I stand with the frog. And the girl. And the Monkeys.

sigh



I agree Sharon.  But the attacks have been made because we believe the green frog.  We have compared Kyle's words and have made a decision.  They don't like that we have made this decision because it differs from theirs.

San, I agree. Even though we all want the same result. Justice for Natalee.

That is the part that boggles the mind.

Different 'theories' and approaches, maybe -- but the goal is the same.

Is being 'right' that damn important to some? It's supposed to be about Natalee.  



I agree.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #793 1/13/09
Post by: texasmom on January 18, 2009, 11:09:04 AM
Forgot the link to the Cool Aruba pics,

http://www.coolaruba.com/component/option,com_gallery2/Itemid,28/?g2_itemId=642909&g2_highlightId=644058

(http://www.coolaruba.com/gallery/main.php?g2_view=core.DownloadItem&g2_itemId=643484&g2_serialNumber=3&g2_GALLERYSID=0d7520c7b4c5fcff8a19ca9ffe62d712)


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #793 1/13/09
Post by: KYcat on January 18, 2009, 11:11:51 AM
Most of it has nothing to do with believing the brave frog. But I am overjoyed that my green friend has received so much support and encouraging words.

It's whether or not you believe Kyle. Those are HIS words.

Kermit wanted to make sure that you all read them, too. And this was the only option remaining.

I was not brave enough to do the same thing kermit did :-(

But I stand with the frog. And the girl. And the Monkeys.

sigh



I agree Sharon.  But the attacks have been made because we believe the green frog.  We have compared Kyle's words and have made a decision.  They don't like that we have made this decision because it differs from theirs.

San, I agree. Even though we all want the same result. Justice for Natalee.

That is the part that boggles the mind.

Different 'theories' and approaches, maybe -- but the goal is the same.

Is being 'right' that damn important to some? It's supposed to be about Natalee.  



I agree.


IMO they are making things more about them instead of Natalee.  What did Hotshot say........ "maybe we should let Kermit run the cage"........ Me thinks, Hotshot wants to run the cage!

How sad.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #793 1/13/09
Post by: Tamikosmom on January 18, 2009, 11:21:31 AM

{snipped}

I am not even convinced that it was Natalee in that trap in the first place but Kyle surely is the one who kept insisting that it was.  Guess that makes this his conspiracy theory instead of the monkeys.




Anna -- that is EXACTLY how I felt.

I was disappointed, but believed what we had been told -- it was NOT Natalee in the trap.

And YES -- Kyle's own words -- his professional opinion and the proof he described FIRST HAND -- are what changed my mind.

If he 'made it all up' he has had many opportunities to make that right. Pretty easy, right? I notice he has not  ::MonkeyWink::


Kyle posts brought over from the Natalee's Freebirds' site convinced me too!!!  Those posts  convinced me 100% that John Silvetti's motives were not about justice for Natalee Holloway!!  Those posts convinced me that Natalee Holloway's remains has  ... in all probability ... been placed inside that trap/cage.

Prior to the posts brought over from the Natalee's Freebirds' site ... I could not comprehend why there had been no plan already in place that would assure that the chain of custody of any discovery that could possibly be case related would be a shared process between the Persistence crew and the Arubans.  After all ... the perception has been since May 30, 2005 that Aruba was behind the coverup that had prevented justice from prevailing for Natalee Holloway.  In my opinion ... an FBI agent should have been present to observe the chain of custody.

Nevertheless ... the Dateline special had convinced me that the contents of the trap/cage were not case related.  After all an American diver (Tim T.) had been present on that initial dive.

Janet

++++++++++++


Tamikosmom
Re: Natalee Case Discussion #744 3/19 -
« Reply #191 on: March 19, 2008, 07:59:59 PM »


Hi Kyle.  It's me ... Tamikosmom ... your worst nightmare.

I sincerely tried to spare you from my prying questions but ... I lack self discipline ... I am so nosy.

Were any members of the Persistence present when the Arubans took possessin of the contents of the cage/trap?  Were the contents itemized ... photos taken?  Was an authorized receipt obtained?

In other words ... was there an official chain of command that went from the Persistence to the Arubans or ... did the Persistence not have any control?

Janet

http://scaredmonkeys.net/index.php?topic=2721.180


oceanexploration
Re: Natalee Case Discussion #744 3/19 -
« Reply #201 on: March 19, 2008, 08:21:47 PM »


Janet, you aren't even a bad dream, let alone a nightmare.  We had little option other than to have the Aruban dive division recover the samples and bring them back under their care.  Remember we are Americans working in Aruban waters, subject to their laws, invitation, and blessing.  Our hands are tied for the most part. I personally was extremely uncomfortable with the chain of custody, being that we weren't a part of it, but I was powerless to do anything about it.  The samples were photographed in detail by one Aruban diver and the other two investigated the contents of the trap, the dimensions, the rigging, and what surrounded the trap.  From the video, it looked like they did a diligent and careful job with the samples and the underwater photography.  I don't know who has these pictures, but I must assume ALE.

http://scaredmonkeys.net/index.php?topic=2721.200


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #793 1/13/09
Post by: Keepthefaith on January 18, 2009, 11:21:52 AM
GOOD MORNING MONKEYS!!  GOOD MORNING ZOOKEEPERS!!

Keepthefaith ... the fog finally lifted in the Fraser Valley of British Columbia ... not a cloud in the sky.  The sun has risen.  What a beautiful morning!!!  How about Seattle?

 ::cartwheel::

Janet
7:55 AM PT





Good Morning Monkey's..

It has lifted here as well.The Sun is shining! ::MonkeyDance:: ::MonkeyDance::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #793 1/13/09
Post by: texasmom on January 18, 2009, 11:23:55 AM
1/16/2009 Tattoo

http://www.coolaruba.com/component/option,com_gallery2/Itemid,28/?g2_itemId=662548&g2_GALLERYSID=e1848e039c706ffffb051cf30a655a07

(http://i21.photobucket.com/albums/b258/texasmom55/Tattoo/01162009Tattoo_1.jpg)

(http://i21.photobucket.com/albums/b258/texasmom55/Tattoo/01162009Tattoo_2.jpg)

Something about that boat just gives me the creeps...

(http://i21.photobucket.com/albums/b258/texasmom55/Tattoo/01162009Tattoo.jpg)



Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #793 1/13/09
Post by: sharon on January 18, 2009, 11:25:25 AM
texasmom 

I'm a big believer of 'context', too. I spent many hours reading the Shango and Simian posts 'in context'  ::MonkeyHaHa::

From the perspective of the 'dynamics' between and amongst the posters.  Other monkeys have done the same, 'what was going on in the outside world when this post was being made'.

You all KNOW the context of Kyle's words for the most part. We weren't exchanging vacation or scuba diving stories. He wanted to share his professional and hands on experiences onboard the Persistence during the search for Natalee.

I totally agree with your 99.9% assessment  ::MonkeyCool::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #793 1/13/09
Post by: texasmom on January 18, 2009, 11:30:13 AM
texasmom 

I'm a big believer of 'context', too. I spent many hours reading the Shango and Simian posts 'in context'   ::MonkeyHaHa::

From the perspective of the 'dynamics' between and amongst the posters.  Other monkeys have done the same, 'what was going on in the outside world when this post was being made'.

You all KNOW the context of Kyle's words for the most part. We weren't exchanging vacation or scuba diving stories. He wanted to share his professional and hands on experiences onboard the Persistence during the search for Natalee.

I totally agree with your 99.9% assessment  ::MonkeyCool::

You were not alone... ::MonkeyRoll:: ::MonkeyHaHa::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #793 1/13/09
Post by: KYcat on January 18, 2009, 11:30:30 AM
1/16/2009 Tattoo

http://www.coolaruba.com/component/option,com_gallery2/Itemid,28/?g2_itemId=662548&g2_GALLERYSID=e1848e039c706ffffb051cf30a655a07

(http://i21.photobucket.com/albums/b258/texasmom55/Tattoo/01162009Tattoo_1.jpg)

(http://i21.photobucket.com/albums/b258/texasmom55/Tattoo/01162009Tattoo_2.jpg)

Something about that boat just gives me the creeps...

(http://i21.photobucket.com/albums/b258/texasmom55/Tattoo/01162009Tattoo.jpg)



Me too, TXMom  and Clyde Burke = Sinister



Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #793 1/13/09
Post by: sharon on January 18, 2009, 11:35:22 AM
Janet, the 'headline' I suddenly 'imagined' in my mind.....'the Persistence may have inadvertently recovered the remains of Natalee Holloway and returned them to Aruban authorities'  ::MonkeyWaa::

I wanted to puke. (hopefully the faint of heart will excuse me)



Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #793 1/13/09
Post by: Anna on January 18, 2009, 11:35:38 AM

{snipped}

I am not even convinced that it was Natalee in that trap in the first place but Kyle surely is the one who kept insisting that it was.  Guess that makes this his conspiracy theory instead of the monkeys.




Anna -- that is EXACTLY how I felt.

I was disappointed, but believed what we had been told -- it was NOT Natalee in the trap.

And YES -- Kyle's own words -- his professional opinion and the proof he described FIRST HAND -- are what changed my mind.

If he 'made it all up' he has had many opportunities to make that right. Pretty easy, right? I notice he has not  ::MonkeyWink::
.

But now for me if he said I made it up I would have my doubts.  I need to see the entire video of what he saw.  Maybe I missed it but have we ever seen the video of the divers going into the trap and retrieving those bags.  Will he say he made it up to cover his ass.  I just don't know anymore.


Me, too, San.  I wouldn't know which version of events to believe.  He could just be trying to CYA because he didn't want his boss to know what he said about him.

But Kyle is the one who just insisted there were remains in that trap. 

I don't know what to think.  And I always thought CapsLockWizard was sort of hilarious had the subject matter not been so grim.  At least entertaining to read all that nonsense.  Like the initials are reversed when arrests are made.  We all knew that was a bunch of hooey and yet he did try to sell it.

When someone lies to or ABOUT me, I have a big problem believing anything else they say. 

And I for sure don't understand all the motives behind so much of this BS being flung about of late.

.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #793 1/13/09
Post by: Keepthefaith on January 18, 2009, 11:35:46 AM
Good Morning/Afternoon Kermit! Have Ya got any uplifting News or Tidbits that You can share with Us? PLease....give Us something to lift Our spirits in regards to the case.....that is if You can...... ::MonkeyWink::

Hello Hotping,

When the time is right I will.




Thank You......Just those seven little words....are encouraging!  ::MonkeyCool:: 

Beth KNOWS what I have been working on.
And I know exactly what Beth wants.

Everyone who wants to doubt or believe whatever someone else is telling them are free to do so.

Those individuals who want to call me names, be insidious will continue to do so, but it won't stop
the good people from bringing the truth out and expose the Aruba cover-up.
I believe the monkeys stand together!





What a beautiful day! ::MonkeyDance::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #793 1/13/09
Post by: Keepthefaith on January 18, 2009, 11:37:39 AM


Does it seem odd to anyone besides me that there was a tennis shoe in the cage photo,
there was a tennis shoe on the front page of Dairo

there was a tennis shoe that CAPS said he lost in that pond when he was a kid (posted on SM someplace)
and
Caps said there was human remains and a tennis shoe in the pond


Kermit ... the distraction agenda to take the focus off of the Persistence undertaking ... to tak the focus off of the trap/cage ... was alive and well.

Janet



And who was apart of the disinformation?Caps,Eduardo,Jossy,Serge,Dolph,Clyde,Mos?Monkey's.

I'm also still intrigued with the Antonio Carlo,Paulus connection?Why go into practice with Carlo?Who owe's who in this relationship?

How else would you protect money laundering, heroin....

Mark Purcell's wife, Marlene Purcell along with Antonio Carlos are involved in the AHATAboard as well.
Antonio Carlos worked for Johan Paul Sjiem Fat, Sjiem Fat & Sjiem Fat, Aruba

 Paulus Van der Sloot participated on a panel which agreed to extradite two relatives of the Mansurs to the US under serious charges some years back

Antonio Carlos worked for the gov't and banks in Aruba.







Very interesting! ::MonkeyCool::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #793 1/13/09
Post by: texasmom on January 18, 2009, 11:38:46 AM
KYcat....yes I agree.  Still a detective?  Owns/or runs a bar?  Plays in 2 or 3 bands?  Where does he find the time....or the money?  When does he sleep?  On the job with ALE?  I haven't been able to find anything that connects him to "owning" the bar, not much on a bar with that name at all.  My research right now says that it is possibly still listed in a former name of a bar and possibly still owned by that bar's owner.  Just the name of the bar changed.  I still have a lot of questions on that one.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #793 1/13/09
Post by: texasmom on January 18, 2009, 11:41:32 AM
Janet, the 'headline' I suddenly 'imagined' in my mind.....'the Persistence may have inadvertently recovered the remains of Natalee Holloway and returned them to Aruban authorities'  ::MonkeyWaa::

I wanted to puke. (hopefully the faint of heart will excuse me)



Yes, I've seen that headline too!   ::MonkeyWaa::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #793 1/13/09
Post by: Anna on January 18, 2009, 11:51:24 AM
I have always found those two things creepy as well.

The Aru-bay video aboard the Tattoo appears to be of a crowd under the influence of something like maybe Ecstacy.  Very strange.

Yes, I think all the riddlers got a big laugh out of jerking us around.  Marvel comics and all.


.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #793 1/13/09
Post by: Anna on January 18, 2009, 11:54:20 AM
At least we haven't yet been told that those were donkey bones in the trap!


 ::MonkeyHaHa::



Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #793 1/13/09
Post by: Tamikosmom on January 18, 2009, 11:55:44 AM
Janet, the 'headline' I suddenly 'imagined' in my mind.....'the Persistence may have inadvertently recovered the remains of Natalee Holloway and returned them to Aruban authorities'  ::MonkeyWaa::

I wanted to puke. (hopefully the faint of heart will excuse me)



Yes, I've seen that headline too!   ::MonkeyWaa::

 ::MonkeyWaa::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #793 1/13/09
Post by: Blue Moon on January 18, 2009, 11:56:13 AM
Janet, the 'headline' I suddenly 'imagined' in my mind.....'the Persistence may have inadvertently recovered the remains of Natalee Holloway and returned them to Aruban authorities'  ::MonkeyWaa::

I wanted to puke. (hopefully the faint of heart will excuse me)



Sharon, that is the sick feeling I got also when those pictures from Robin was posted here.  I remember telling Kermit "OMG, I think I see a skull" and she said Yes.  I knew then the opportunity was GONE forever because of who retrieved the contents of that cage.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #793 1/13/09
Post by: Keepthefaith on January 18, 2009, 11:57:21 AM
At least we haven't yet been told that those were donkey bones in the trap!


 ::MonkeyHaHa::



No.It's an extrodinarily big Hermit crab bone! ::MonkeyLaugh::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #793 1/13/09
Post by: Blue Moon on January 18, 2009, 11:58:39 AM
Sorry, forgot to tell everyone GOOD MORNING!


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #793 1/13/09
Post by: Keepthefaith on January 18, 2009, 11:59:32 AM
Sorry, forgot to tell everyone GOOD MORNING!

GOOOOOOOOOOOD MORRRRRRNNNNINNNNGGGGG Blue Moon! ::MonkeyDance::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #793 1/13/09
Post by: Tamikosmom on January 18, 2009, 12:00:36 PM
Well Monkeys ... I am off for the day.

I will be leaving for church shortly and ... then the afternoon will be spent at a Karate tournament.  My daughter, SIL, two eldest grandsons (9/10) and granddaughter (7) will be partipants.

I HATE Karate but ... I will be cheering them on nevertheless.

Have a good day all.

Janet


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #793 1/13/09
Post by: texasmom on January 18, 2009, 12:01:13 PM
Sorry, forgot to tell everyone GOOD MORNING!

Good morning Blue Moon!   ::MonkeyCool::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #793 1/13/09
Post by: texasmom on January 18, 2009, 12:01:54 PM
Well Monkeys ... I am off for the day.

I will be leaving for church shortly and ... then the afternoon will be spent at a Karate tournament.  My daughter, SIL, two eldest grandsons (9/10) and granddaughter (7) will be partipants.

I HATE Karate but ... I will be cheering them on nevertheless.

Have a good day all.

Janet

Have a great day Janet!   ::MonkeyDance::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #793 1/13/09
Post by: Keepthefaith on January 18, 2009, 12:02:05 PM
Well Monkeys ... I am off for the day.

I will be leaving for church shortly and ... then the afternoon will be spent at a Karate tournament.  My daughter, SIL, two eldest grandsons (9/10) and granddaughter (7) will be partipants.

I HATE Karate but ... I will be cheering them on nevertheless.

Have a good day all.

Janet

Good Day Janet.Let the sun shine on your face today Janet.It's beautiful down here!


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #793 1/13/09
Post by: Blue Moon on January 18, 2009, 12:03:58 PM
Did we ever find out for a fact that John Q. Kelly and Mark Furhman were in Aruba?  I know Julia (cough, cough) reported it in her rag but I don't believe we heard it from any respectable journalist.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #793 1/13/09
Post by: Keepthefaith on January 18, 2009, 12:05:58 PM
Did we ever find out for a fact that John Q. Kelly and Mark Furhman were in Aruba?  I know Julia (cough, cough) reported it in her rag but I don't believe we heard it from any respectable journalist.

I for one did not here a peep about it!Maybe there trip was to brief Hero Brinkman if they did go?


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #793 1/13/09
Post by: texasmom on January 18, 2009, 12:06:21 PM
Did we ever find out for a fact that John Q. Kelly and Mark Furhman were in Aruba?  I know Julia (cough, cough) reported it in her rag but I don't believe we heard it from any respectable journalist.

I didn't see any other reports about them being there.

Other than JQK saying he was going on Greta, that's the only info I know of.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #793 1/13/09
Post by: Anna on January 18, 2009, 12:17:26 PM
Did we ever find out for a fact that John Q. Kelly and Mark Furhman were in Aruba?  I know Julia (cough, cough) reported it in her rag but I don't believe we heard it from any respectable journalist.

I didn't see any other reports about them being there.

Other than JQK saying he was going on Greta, that's the only info I know of.

It was also reported that Beth and Greta had not only arrived in Aruba but were launching a media offensive!  Just as with the recent death of the American being from a fall or being hit with a car, the state of journalism seems very truth-challenged.



Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #793 1/13/09
Post by: texasmom on January 18, 2009, 12:19:01 PM
1/16/2009

(http://www.magic965.com/pictures/albums/JAN2009/160109%20BAHIA_MAMBO/Mambo_9.JPG)



Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #793 1/13/09
Post by: texasmom on January 18, 2009, 12:21:53 PM
Did we ever find out for a fact that John Q. Kelly and Mark Furhman were in Aruba?  I know Julia (cough, cough) reported it in her rag but I don't believe we heard it from any respectable journalist.

I didn't see any other reports about them being there.

Other than JQK saying he was going on Greta, that's the only info I know of.

It was also reported that Beth and Greta had not only arrived in Aruba but were launching a media offensive!  Just as with the recent death of the American being from a fall or being hit with a car, the state of journalism seems very truth-challenged.


I read the same report about the tourist death in another Aruban paper also.  Now, I've been thinking if this really is the guy that was hit by a car....WHO was driving the car?  I just can't believe this was an honest mistake....not in Aruba.   ::MonkeyNoNo::



Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #793 1/13/09
Post by: Keepthefaith on January 18, 2009, 12:31:37 PM
And to all a Good Day! ::MonkeyDance::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #793 1/13/09
Post by: Slogger on January 18, 2009, 12:38:16 PM
At least we haven't yet been told that those were donkey bones in the trap!


 ::MonkeyHaHa::



No.It's an extrodinarily big Hermit crab bone! ::MonkeyLaugh::

Yes, along with the often seen sneaker-fish and the mysterious phone-coral.


Good Afternoon, everyone.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #793 1/13/09
Post by: texasmom on January 18, 2009, 12:40:00 PM
1/17/2009 Bondia Page 9a

http://www.bondia.com/index.php?option=com_flippingbook&book_id=2

At first I thought this might be the same info that was in the Amigoe article, but I'm not sure.  I may try to type it out and run it through the translator later.  If anyone stops by that can translate it, it would be greatly appreciated.  TIA

(http://i21.photobucket.com/albums/b258/texasmom55/HollowayCaseNews1/01172009Bondia9a.jpg)



Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #793 1/13/09
Post by: texasmom on January 18, 2009, 12:45:42 PM
1/17/2009 Bondia Page 11a

http://www.bondia.com/index.php?option=com_flippingbook&book_id=2

(http://i21.photobucket.com/albums/b258/texasmom55/Misc%20News%204/01172009Bondia11a.jpg)

This is the third paper to report it.

If anyone finds anything in the papers here, please post it. 


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #793 1/13/09
Post by: Blue Moon on January 18, 2009, 12:48:35 PM
Did we ever find out for a fact that John Q. Kelly and Mark Furhman were in Aruba?  I know Julia (cough, cough) reported it in her rag but I don't believe we heard it from any respectable journalist.

I didn't see any other reports about them being there.

Other than JQK saying he was going on Greta, that's the only info I know of.

It was also reported that Beth and Greta had not only arrived in Aruba but were launching a media offensive!  Just as with the recent death of the American being from a fall or being hit with a car, the state of journalism seems very truth-challenged.


I read the same report about the tourist death in another Aruban paper also.  Now, I've been thinking if this really is the guy that was hit by a car....WHO was driving the car?  I just can't believe this was an honest mistake....not in Aruba.   ::MonkeyNoNo::



Since I told my BIL I will "NEVER" speak to him if he vacations in Aruba I guess I will not be able to educate him on the goings-on in Aruba.  I told him to come to my home so I could educate him before he made this fatal mistake in vacationing in Aruba BUT he has yet to show up.  He says everything is O.K. in Aruba, Natalee was sold into slavery and besides he can take-care-of-himself.  He is a jerk!


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #793 1/13/09
Post by: Blue Moon on January 18, 2009, 12:50:00 PM
1/17/2009 Bondia Page 11a

http://www.bondia.com/index.php?option=com_flippingbook&book_id=2

(http://i21.photobucket.com/albums/b258/texasmom55/Misc%20News%204/01172009Bondia11a.jpg)

This is the third paper to report it.

If anyone finds anything in the papers here, please post it. 


Could it be saying he jumped from a balcony into the path of a car?


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #793 1/13/09
Post by: texasmom on January 18, 2009, 12:55:55 PM
1/17/2009 Bondia Page 11a

http://www.bondia.com/index.php?option=com_flippingbook&book_id=2

(http://i21.photobucket.com/albums/b258/texasmom55/Misc%20News%204/01172009Bondia11a.jpg)

This is the third paper to report it.

If anyone finds anything in the papers here, please post it. 


Could it be saying he jumped from a balcony into the path of a car?

I don't see it in the articles, but that could be a possibility.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #793 1/13/09
Post by: klaasend on January 18, 2009, 01:05:06 PM
1/17/2009 Bondia Page 11a

http://www.bondia.com/index.php?option=com_flippingbook&book_id=2

(http://i21.photobucket.com/albums/b258/texasmom55/Misc%20News%204/01172009Bondia11a.jpg)

This is the third paper to report it.

If anyone finds anything in the papers here, please post it. 


Reminder of the descrepancy.  I haven't seen anything about his death in the Orlando papers yet:

http://blogs.orlandosentinel.com/entertainment_stage_theat/2009/01/matt-henry-reco.html

Matt Henry recovering after serious accident
posted by emaupin on Jan 7, 2009 2:02:51 PM
 
 Many of you know juggler Matt Henry, who has done a couple of really wonderful Fringe shows in years past and won a world juggling championship in 2001. Matt was hit by a car in Aruba a few days ago, and he suffered a broken arm (in two places), fractured ribs and pelvis and a punctured lung.

The good news is that he has medical insurance and that his doctors are sure Matt will recover and juggle again. The bad news is that he'll be in a hospital in Aruba for the next few weeks before he's flown to a rehabilitation center in the U.S.

David Lee suggests that cards and letters from his friends and admirers may speed up the healing process. Matt's address is:

Matt Henry, Room 344
Horacio Oduber Hospital
Oranjestad, Aruba
Let's all send good wishes his way.


His Myspace:

http://profile.myspace.com/index.cfm?fuseaction=user.viewprofile&friendID=174413282


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #793 1/13/09
Post by: texasmom on January 18, 2009, 01:17:05 PM
If this has ever been discussed I don't remember it.

Paul Comenencia, connected to Papito Comenencia?

Came across this information about Paul last night.

http://news.caribseek.com/set-up/exec/view.cgi?archive=99&num=28406
2/23/2006

snip
The candidate ministers for PAR will most likely be party leader Emily de Jongh-Elhage as Prime Minister, Paul Comenencia will stay on as Minister Plenipotentiary in The Hague, David Dick will remain Minister of Justice and Omayra Leeflang will be appointed Minister of Education and Culture.
snip

http://www.arubahuis.nl/documents/noticiero/2004okt-nov.pdf

(http://i21.photobucket.com/albums/b258/texasmom55/Misc%20News%204/ComenenciaPaul2004.jpg)

Google translation of the caption on the picture:

Welcome reception Netherlands Antilles Minister Plenipotentiary
The Director of the House Aruba Mr Maduro Shonno was present at the welcome reception for Authorized Minister of the Dutch Antilles, the Mr Paul Comenencia.
It was also retired from Mr. Carel representing the Haseth of the Antilles in Den Haag. He goes back to Curacao.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #793 1/13/09
Post by: texasmom on January 18, 2009, 01:28:11 PM


Thanks Klaas!   ::MonkeyCool::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #793 1/13/09
Post by: Edward on January 18, 2009, 01:49:26 PM
There are those knuckles again.. I think he practices hitting telephone poles for fun in his off time.
It is a low class boy all the way.. ::MonkeyWink::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #793 1/13/09
Post by: texasmom on January 18, 2009, 01:53:21 PM
If this has ever been discussed I don't remember it.

Paul Comenencia, connected to Papito Comenencia?

Came across this information about Paul last night.

http://news.caribseek.com/set-up/exec/view.cgi?archive=99&num=28406
2/23/2006

snip
The candidate ministers for PAR will most likely be party leader Emily de Jongh-Elhage as Prime Minister, Paul Comenencia will stay on as Minister Plenipotentiary in The Hague, David Dick will remain Minister of Justice and Omayra Leeflang will be appointed Minister of Education and Culture.
snip

http://www.arubahuis.nl/documents/noticiero/2004okt-nov.pdf

(http://i21.photobucket.com/albums/b258/texasmom55/Misc%20News%204/ComenenciaPaul2004.jpg)

Google translation of the caption on the picture:

Welcome reception Netherlands Antilles Minister Plenipotentiary
The Director of the House Aruba Mr Maduro Shonno was present at the welcome reception for Authorized Minister of the Dutch Antilles, the Mr Paul Comenencia.
It was also retired from Mr. Carel representing the Haseth of the Antilles in Den Haag. He goes back to Curacao.

http://bonairereporter.com/news/008pdfs/01-04-08.pdf

Jan 2008

Prime Minister of the Netherlands Jan Peter Balkenende will visit the Dutch Caribbean in February. The
Governments of both the Netherlands Antilles and Aruba received a letter by Balkenende confirming his visit from February 10 to 15. He will be accompanied by State Secretary in charge of Kingdom Relations, Ank Bijleveld, and Antillean Plenipotentiary Minister in The Hague, Paul Comenencia. 


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #793 1/13/09
Post by: texasmom on January 18, 2009, 02:14:10 PM
http://getagripmonkey.blogspot.com/2006_04_09_archive.html

4.13.2006
Antillean House angry about brown Joran
Amigoe
4/12/2006

CURACAO/RIJSWIJK – Minister Plenipotentiary Paul Comenencia of the Antilles accuses before the ANP the police and the Public Prosecutor (OM) as producers of the Dutch program Opsporings Verzocht of twisting the facts consciously and abundantly clear. He also says that police and justice do no longer need to count on the cooperation of the Antilles.

The criticism is about yesterday’s program that dedicated time to the disappearance of the American Natalee Holloway. According to Comenencia, Joran van der Sloot, a white Dutch boy, was presented as a brown person, which was unjust.

“By consciously twisting abundantly clear facts and misleading the public that are being asked for their cooperation in tracing perpetrators, the program departs from its purpose”, says Comenencia. Why didn’t they choose a white actor for Joran’s character? By using a brown actor it gives the impression that the producers have opted for highlighting what is already presented as stereotype criminal in the Netherlands. And this is unjust.

Opsporings Verzocht is an investigation tool for police and justice. These two services decided on the content of the program. “What should we think of the rest of the program? They do no longer need to count on our cooperation. Looking for fictitious perpetrators makes no sense.” A spokesperson of the Utrecht police that has worked on the program says in a reaction on Comenencia’s accusations that the reconstruction was done by the investigation team in Aruba. “We helped, but we were not responsible for the direction.”

OM in Aruba: ‘Stand-in is white’
Amigoe
4/12/2006

The young man that acted Joran van der Sloot in the reconstruction yesterday has very light skin and considered white in Aruba, said the OM in a press report in Aruba.

Besides, no skin colour was considered during the selection. “It is not important for the investigation team what the colour of a person’s skin is, or how dark the person is.”

The length and the figure were the criteria used for selecting the young man that played Joran. The stand-ins for Joran and the brothers Kalpoe were selected amongst police officers of the Police Academy in Aruba.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #793 1/13/09
Post by: texasmom on January 18, 2009, 02:44:12 PM
1/17/2009 Bondia Page 2

http://www.bondia.com/index.php?option=com_flippingbook&book_id=2

(http://i21.photobucket.com/albums/b258/texasmom55/Misc%20News%204/01172009Bondia2a_1.jpg)

Papiamentu translation:

atraconan on tourist is again of one gang of young specifico saturday, 17 january 2009 oranjestad – have indicacion earnest cu the atraconan on tourist ultimo temponan is come of one gang of young cu in pasado owing to comete type of atraconan here end. this according alto comisario of police peter de witte at good morning aruba yesterday. this do not less afor cu they're haciendo todo can todo for atrapa the are of young here y so trece peace bek at the area hotelero where cu had all the problemanan ultimo time. owing to haci the question at the alto comisario mirando the mature cu in pasado had one are of young also cu was comete the atraconan here, creando the panico necesario. y now posiblemente have one another are of young cu also is cometiendo the same actonan here. on the asunto here the alto comisario owing to show cu alas have indicacion cu the trip here again is deal of one are of young cu is cometiendo the atraconan here in one form structura. of another near do not so cu all tourist cu arrive aruba, is wordo atraca. is also the form con are you anda y deal the situation here according the boss maximo of police. do you have cu as cuenta con are you count ; the storia here according de witte, for her tourist or person not achieve the impresion cu aruba is one island insigur. „nos can tell according my, cu that assure do not the caso aworaki” de witte owing to sigura good morning aruba. cada incidente cu one tourist is uno dimas. police is extremely alerta on the asunto here y is realisa cu the seguridad in cuadro of turism is very important. could you inverti very much coin in trece tourist, but if not have sense of siguransa, not have to talk cu atrae tourist is coin throw afo, but do you will notice cu are you lose territory on the asunto here. visibility team is work together cu ahata y is funcionando good although have lugar for mehoracion. is trahando together cu the seguridad of hotelnan cu is the eye of police in casonan so. y is purbando so also for succeed achieve financiamento for can atende the asunto seriamente. bek for her gang of young, year happen had one aumento of atraco on tourist. that owing to resulta enberdad of is one asunto of one gang specifico, cu owing to wordo atrapa, enjuicia, y encarcela. alas have one are cu again is haciendo same. do not descarta cu this will is posiblemente the same are because the time cu they owing to go close, was one time limita. come across


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #793 1/13/09
Post by: texasmom on January 18, 2009, 03:04:43 PM
1/17/2009  I Love Muzika A Presenta Island Funk @ Confession Night Club 17 Jan

http://www.magic965.com/index.php?option=com_wrapper&view=wrapper&Itemid=87

(http://www.magic965.com/pictures/albums/JAN2009/170109%20CONFESSION1/Confession_196.JPG)

(http://www.magic965.com/pictures/albums/JAN2009/170109%20CONFESSION1/Confession_202.JPG)


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #793 1/13/09
Post by: texasmom on January 18, 2009, 03:07:45 PM
1/17/2009  I Love Muzika A Presenta Island Funk @ Confession Night Club 17 Jan

http://www.magic965.com/index.php?option=com_wrapper&view=wrapper&Itemid=87

(http://www.magic965.com/pictures/albums/JAN2009/170109%20CONFESSION1/Confession_196.JPG)

(http://www.magic965.com/pictures/albums/JAN2009/170109%20CONFESSION1/Confession_202.JPG)

(http://www.magic965.com/pictures/albums/JAN2009/170109%20CONFESSION/Confession_86.JPG)


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #793 1/13/09
Post by: Blue Moon on January 18, 2009, 04:02:51 PM
1/17/2009  I Love Muzika A Presenta Island Funk @ Confession Night Club 17 Jan

http://www.magic965.com/index.php?option=com_wrapper&view=wrapper&Itemid=87

(http://www.magic965.com/pictures/albums/JAN2009/170109%20CONFESSION1/Confession_196.JPG)

(http://www.magic965.com/pictures/albums/JAN2009/170109%20CONFESSION1/Confession_202.JPG)

(http://www.magic965.com/pictures/albums/JAN2009/170109%20CONFESSION/Confession_86.JPG)

The torch has passed to the next generation.  I have always believed that what Joran did was just passed down from his fathers generation.  Sort of like an initiation.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #793 1/13/09
Post by: WhiskeyGirl on January 18, 2009, 04:07:42 PM
At least we haven't yet been told that those were donkey bones in the trap!


 ::MonkeyHaHa::



No.It's an extrodinarily big Hermit crab bone! ::MonkeyLaugh::

Yes, along with the often seen sneaker-fish and the mysterious phone-coral.


Good Afternoon, everyone.

I consider that Aruba may be an island surrounded by a vast watery graveyard.  

Think of all the bones that was ashore and end up in the back of a police cruiser? 

Think of all the times they fed the sharks around the island?  Who knows what was in that shark kibble?

Think of all the illegal aliens and tourists that disappear in the rough ocean water?

Think of all the runaways and human trafficing?  What happens to those people?

Who knows what gets dumped by the cruise ships?  Merchant ships?  Military ships?

Is it any wonder that 'things' just wash ashore?  Mystery items?  Where are they warehoused?  Where are they taken before and after identification?  Who in Aruba keeps track of all these items?

Remember the story of the prisioners buried at the sand dunes?  What did they do with those remains before they opened the park to the public?

imho


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #793 1/13/09
Post by: bleachedblack on January 18, 2009, 04:29:22 PM
There are those knuckles again.. I think he practices hitting telephone poles for fun in his off time.
It is a low class boy all the way.. ::MonkeyWink::

I agree, something ain't right there. ::MonkeyCool:: But these two are way cute......

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2josUqMTUmE


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #793 1/13/09
Post by: San on January 18, 2009, 04:49:49 PM
There are those knuckles again.. I think he practices hitting telephone poles for fun in his off time.
It is a low class boy all the way.. ::MonkeyWink::

I agree, something ain't right there. ::MonkeyCool:: But these two are way cute......

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2josUqMTUmE

They are cute.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #793 1/13/09
Post by: Keepthefaith on January 18, 2009, 04:50:36 PM
At least we haven't yet been told that those were donkey bones in the trap!


 ::MonkeyHaHa::



No.It's an extrodinarily big Hermit crab bone! ::MonkeyLaugh::

Yes, along with the often seen sneaker-fish and the mysterious phone-coral.


Good Afternoon, everyone.

I consider that Aruba may be an island surrounded by a vast watery graveyard.  

Think of all the bones that was ashore and end up in the back of a police cruiser? 

Think of all the times they fed the sharks around the island?  Who knows what was in that shark kibble?

Think of all the illegal aliens and tourists that disappear in the rough ocean water?

Think of all the runaways and human trafficing?  What happens to those people?

Who knows what gets dumped by the cruise ships?  Merchant ships?  Military ships?

Is it any wonder that 'things' just wash ashore?  Mystery items?  Where are they warehoused?  Where are they taken before and after identification?  Who in Aruba keeps track of all these items?

Remember the story of the prisioners buried at the sand dunes?  What did they do with those remains before they opened the park to the public?

imho


There's possiblilties in all that.The difference is.They went down to search for a trap/cage(really mapping the floor),as well as other targets(mapping the floor).They found a trap/cage(while mapping the ocean floor).They found in Kyle's word's.Human remains(while mapping the ocean floor).ALE comes in and swoops the contents up!Guess we'll never know who was really in that cage.That's the problem with the whole Persistence search!It wasn't about Natalee.JMOO

KEEPTHEFAITH


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #793 1/13/09
Post by: SS on January 18, 2009, 05:35:43 PM
Tim Miller disappointed in Casey and broke from Caylee search

Equusearch, the Texas-based organization that assisted in the search for Natalee Holloway in Aruba, also conducted an extensive search for Caylee Anthony prior to her remains being discovered by Roy Kronk in December.

Tim Miller, who heads the group said from the first time he met with Casey Anthony,  22, she showed no signs of remorse whatsoever.  Miller said he experienced "anger and disappointment on this."  In fact, Miller claims that during the time Casey was out on bond and Caylee was still missing, Casey acted inappropriately.  "She had smiles all over her face, ran around like she had just won a cheerleading competition.  Very discouraging from the beginning," Miller said.

Miller believes the his organization has spent over $100,000 in the search for Caylee and believes that the discovery of Caylee's remains near the Anthony home indicates Casey is responsible.  Miller feels he was taken by Casey because she knew where Caylee was all along, while he was using his limited resources to find her.

As a result, Equusearch must now stop looking for missing loved ones due to the financial strain the group is experiencing due to the extensive searches conducted to find Caylee.  "Casey has plenty of time on her hands," Miller said.  "She should call and say sorry Equusearch can't help…you right now."

Despite his financial hardships, Miller wants to try to help families in Florida, so he has opened an Orlando chapter of Equusearch.

Casey Anthony, 22, has been charged with the murder of her daughter, Caylee

http://www.examiner.com/x-1168-Crime-Examiner~y2009m1d17-Tim-Miller-disappointed-in-Casey-and-broke-from-Caylee-search


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #793 1/13/09
Post by: Nut44x4 on January 18, 2009, 05:52:47 PM
am I ::MonkeyConfused:: ? Is this suppose to go in Caylee's thread? SS.....you trying to drive me Nuts??  ::MonkeyHaHa::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #793 1/13/09
Post by: klaasend on January 18, 2009, 06:03:51 PM
am I ::MonkeyConfused:: ? Is this suppose to go in Caylee's thread? SS.....you trying to drive me Nuts??  ::MonkeyHaHa::

I'll copy it over there.  It mentions NH so we can keep it here too.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #793 1/13/09
Post by: Lifesong on January 18, 2009, 06:05:10 PM
Most of it has nothing to do with believing the brave frog. But I am overjoyed that my green friend has received so much support and encouraging words.

It's whether or not you believe Kyle. Those are HIS words.

Kermit wanted to make sure that you all read them, too. And this was the only option remaining.

I was not brave enough to do the same thing kermit did :-(

But I stand with the frog. And the girl. And the Monkeys.

sigh



I agree Sharon.  But the attacks have been made because we believe the green frog.  We have compared Kyle's words and have made a decision.  They don't like that we have made this decision because it differs from theirs.


I think some are still trying to play "Shoot the Messenger" and don't realize how insulting it is.  I'm not sure which is worse...

  -  that they're still playing "Shoot the Messenger"   ::MonkeyHaHa::   ::MonkeyLaugh::

                          OR

  -  that they don't realize how insulting it is   ::MonkeyRoll:: ::MonkeyTongue::



As usual, this is JMO, and
I'm pages behind...   ::MonkeyCool::



Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #793 1/13/09
Post by: SS on January 18, 2009, 06:05:52 PM
am I ::MonkeyConfused:: ? Is this suppose to go in Caylee's thread? SS.....you trying to drive me Nuts??  ::MonkeyHaHa::


No, Nut, I'm not trying to drive you nuts.   ::MonkeyHaHa::  I posted this for the NAH thread to see that Tim Miller and TES are having financial problems.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #793 1/13/09
Post by: hotping on January 18, 2009, 06:06:07 PM
1/17/2009 Bondia Page 11a

http://www.bondia.com/index.php?option=com_flippingbook&book_id=2

(http://i21.photobucket.com/albums/b258/texasmom55/Misc%20News%204/01172009Bondia11a.jpg)

This is the third paper to report it.

If anyone finds anything in the papers here, please post it. 


Reminder of the descrepancy.  I haven't seen anything about his death in the Orlando papers yet:

http://blogs.orlandosentinel.com/entertainment_stage_theat/2009/01/matt-henry-reco.html

Matt Henry recovering after serious accident
posted by emaupin on Jan 7, 2009 2:02:51 PM
 
 Many of you know juggler Matt Henry, who has done a couple of really wonderful Fringe shows in years past and won a world juggling championship in 2001. Matt was hit by a car in Aruba a few days ago, and he suffered a broken arm (in two places), fractured ribs and pelvis and a punctured lung.

The good news is that he has medical insurance and that his doctors are sure Matt will recover and juggle again. The bad news is that he'll be in a hospital in Aruba for the next few weeks before he's flown to a rehabilitation center in the U.S.

David Lee suggests that cards and letters from his friends and admirers may speed up the healing process. Matt's address is:

Matt Henry, Room 344
Horacio Oduber Hospital
Oranjestad, Aruba
Let's all send good wishes his way.


His Myspace:

http://profile.myspace.com/index.cfm?fuseaction=user.viewprofile&friendID=174413282
This is a reply to an email that I sent in regards to Matt Henry

You must be confusing Matt with someone else. He's back in the U.S. and recuperating.
 
Elizabeth Maupin
Theater Critic/Arts Reporter
The Orlando Sentinel
633 N. Orange Ave.
Orlando, FL  32801
407-420-5426



 


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #793 1/13/09
Post by: texasmom on January 18, 2009, 06:08:35 PM
1/17/2009 Bondia Page 11a

http://www.bondia.com/index.php?option=com_flippingbook&book_id=2

(http://i21.photobucket.com/albums/b258/texasmom55/Misc%20News%204/01172009Bondia11a.jpg)

This is the third paper to report it.

If anyone finds anything in the papers here, please post it. 


Reminder of the descrepancy.  I haven't seen anything about his death in the Orlando papers yet:

http://blogs.orlandosentinel.com/entertainment_stage_theat/2009/01/matt-henry-reco.html

Matt Henry recovering after serious accident
posted by emaupin on Jan 7, 2009 2:02:51 PM
 
 Many of you know juggler Matt Henry, who has done a couple of really wonderful Fringe shows in years past and won a world juggling championship in 2001. Matt was hit by a car in Aruba a few days ago, and he suffered a broken arm (in two places), fractured ribs and pelvis and a punctured lung.

The good news is that he has medical insurance and that his doctors are sure Matt will recover and juggle again. The bad news is that he'll be in a hospital in Aruba for the next few weeks before he's flown to a rehabilitation center in the U.S.

David Lee suggests that cards and letters from his friends and admirers may speed up the healing process. Matt's address is:

Matt Henry, Room 344
Horacio Oduber Hospital
Oranjestad, Aruba
Let's all send good wishes his way.


His Myspace:

http://profile.myspace.com/index.cfm?fuseaction=user.viewprofile&friendID=174413282
This is a reply to an email that I sent in regards to Matt Henry

You must be confusing Matt with someone else. He's back in the U.S. and recuperating.
 
Elizabeth Maupin
Theater Critic/Arts Reporter
The Orlando Sentinel
633 N. Orange Ave.
Orlando, FL  32801
407-420-5426
 

Thanks Hotping, that is great news!   ::MonkeyCool::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #793 1/13/09
Post by: hotping on January 18, 2009, 06:14:05 PM
YW....Yes it is Great News!  ::MonkeyCool::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #793 1/13/09
Post by: Keepthefaith on January 18, 2009, 06:14:42 PM
am I ::MonkeyConfused:: ? Is this suppose to go in Caylee's thread? SS.....you trying to drive me Nuts??  ::MonkeyHaHa::


No, Nut, I'm not trying to drive you nuts.   ::MonkeyHaHa::  I posted this for the NAH thread to see that Tim Miller and TES are having financial problems.

Why doesn't Silvetti or Schaeffer donate some money?Jusss Askin ::MonkeyCool::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #793 1/13/09
Post by: hotping on January 18, 2009, 06:15:37 PM
am I ::MonkeyConfused:: ? Is this suppose to go in Caylee's thread? SS.....you trying to drive me Nuts??  ::MonkeyHaHa::


No, Nut, I'm not trying to drive you nuts.   ::MonkeyHaHa::  I posted this for the NAH thread to see that Tim Miller and TES are having financial problems.
Thanks SS for the article.... ::MonkeyWink::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #793 1/13/09
Post by: SS on January 18, 2009, 06:24:22 PM
am I ::MonkeyConfused:: ? Is this suppose to go in Caylee's thread? SS.....you trying to drive me Nuts??  ::MonkeyHaHa::


No, Nut, I'm not trying to drive you nuts.   ::MonkeyHaHa::  I posted this for the NAH thread to see that Tim Miller and TES are having financial problems.
Thanks SS for the article.... ::MonkeyWink::




You're welcome Hotping.  I have been completely out of touch for over a week.  Has anyone
come up with anything regarding the statement from Hans Moss saying that he didn't receive polygraphs from Tim?  Does anyone know if this is true?  It doesn't sound right to me.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #793 1/13/09
Post by: texasmom on January 18, 2009, 06:25:55 PM
I went back to the first of the month editions of Awe Mainta and found this article.  I believe it says from the 3rd floor, and doesn't mention alchohol.  Picture here was included in the article about the death, so I think it's the same incident.

1/5/2009 Awe Mainta Pg 9

http://awemainta.com/home/

(http://i21.photobucket.com/albums/b258/texasmom55/Misc%20News%204/01052009AweMaintaPg9.jpg)


Papiamentu translation:

tourist owing to cay for of 3 floor of one hotel capitalino owing to achieve drugs in his blood

one caso cu owing to wing atencion assure year new night, was the mature cu one tourist cu is stay in one hotel capitalino, owing to cay for of 3 floor. ambulance have to owing to transport’e for hospital, where past owing to stay interna, cu some rebchi break. also in his blood owing to achieve drugs. haciendo investigacion in his bedroom, owing to descubri drugs also.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #793 1/13/09
Post by: hotping on January 18, 2009, 06:36:23 PM
am I ::MonkeyConfused:: ? Is this suppose to go in Caylee's thread? SS.....you trying to drive me Nuts??  ::MonkeyHaHa::


No, Nut, I'm not trying to drive you nuts.   ::MonkeyHaHa::  I posted this for the NAH thread to see that Tim Miller and TES are having financial problems.
Thanks SS for the article.... ::MonkeyWink::




You're welcome Hotping.  I have been completely out of touch for over a week.  Has anyone
come up with anything regarding the statement from Hans Moss saying that he didn't receive polygraphs from Tim?  Does anyone know if this is true?  It doesn't sound right to me.
Its good to have You back on the forum....As far as Tim not giving the polygraph results to Mos....I have not heard anything that says whether it is true or not.... but Why would Tim not give them to Mos? And We all know that Mos is a Liar...JMHO....  ::MonkeyWink::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #793 1/13/09
Post by: hotping on January 18, 2009, 06:38:09 PM
I went back to the first of the month editions of Awe Mainta and found this article.  I believe it says from the 3rd floor, and doesn't mention alchohol.  Picture here was included in the article about the death, so I think it's the same incident.

1/5/2009 Awe Mainta Pg 9

http://awemainta.com/home/

(http://i21.photobucket.com/albums/b258/texasmom55/Misc%20News%204/01052009AweMaintaPg9.jpg)


Papiamentu translation:

tourist owing to cay for of 3 floor of one hotel capitalino owing to achieve drugs in his blood

one caso cu owing to wing atencion assure year new night, was the mature cu one tourist cu is stay in one hotel capitalino, owing to cay for of 3 floor. ambulance have to owing to transport’e for hospital, where past owing to stay interna, cu some rebchi break. also in his blood owing to achieve drugs. haciendo investigacion in his bedroom, owing to descubri drugs also.
Beats Me....It is Aruba after all..... ::MonkeyConfused::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #793 1/13/09
Post by: Blue Moon on January 18, 2009, 06:44:19 PM
am I ::MonkeyConfused:: ? Is this suppose to go in Caylee's thread? SS.....you trying to drive me Nuts??  ::MonkeyHaHa::


No, Nut, I'm not trying to drive you nuts.   ::MonkeyHaHa::  I posted this for the NAH thread to see that Tim Miller and TES are having financial problems.
Thanks SS for the article.... ::MonkeyWink::




You're welcome Hotping.  I have been completely out of touch for over a week.  Has anyone
come up with anything regarding the statement from Hans Moss saying that he didn't receive polygraphs from Tim?  Does anyone know if this is true?  It doesn't sound right to me.
Its good to have You back on the forum....As far as Tim not giving the polygraph results to Mos....I have not heard anything that says whether it is true or not.... but Why would Tim not give them to Mos? And We all know that Mos is a Liar...JMHO....  ::MonkeyWink::

I will have to do some looking on this but I thought I read that Tim tried to give the results to Mos but Mos refused them saying they could not be used in Aruba.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #793 1/13/09
Post by: 2NJSons_Mom on January 18, 2009, 06:45:40 PM
I went back to the first of the month editions of Awe Mainta and found this article.  I believe it says from the 3rd floor, and doesn't mention alchohol.  Picture here was included in the article about the death, so I think it's the same incident.

1/5/2009 Awe Mainta Pg 9

http://awemainta.com/home/

(http://i21.photobucket.com/albums/b258/texasmom55/Misc%20News%204/01052009AweMaintaPg9.jpg)


Papiamentu translation:

tourist owing to cay for of 3 floor of one hotel capitalino owing to achieve drugs in his blood

one caso cu owing to wing atencion assure year new night, was the mature cu one tourist cu is stay in one hotel capitalino, owing to cay for of 3 floor. ambulance have to owing to transport’e for hospital, where past owing to stay interna, cu some rebchi break. also in his blood owing to achieve drugs. haciendo investigacion in his bedroom, owing to descubri drugs also.
Beats Me....It is Aruba after all..... ::MonkeyConfused::

Beats me, too.  Using the name in the other articles, I tried to search a few times for other tidbits...came up empty. 


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #793 1/13/09
Post by: hotping on January 18, 2009, 06:51:24 PM
am I ::MonkeyConfused:: ? Is this suppose to go in Caylee's thread? SS.....you trying to drive me Nuts??  ::MonkeyHaHa::


No, Nut, I'm not trying to drive you nuts.   ::MonkeyHaHa::  I posted this for the NAH thread to see that Tim Miller and TES are having financial problems.
Thanks SS for the article.... ::MonkeyWink::




You're welcome Hotping.  I have been completely out of touch for over a week.  Has anyone
come up with anything regarding the statement from Hans Moss saying that he didn't receive polygraphs from Tim?  Does anyone know if this is true?  It doesn't sound right to me.
Its good to have You back on the forum....As far as Tim not giving the polygraph results to Mos....I have not heard anything that says whether it is true or not.... but Why would Tim not give them to Mos? And We all know that Mos is a Liar...JMHO....  ::MonkeyWink::

I will have to do some looking on this but I thought I read that Tim tried to give the results to Mos but Mos refused them saying they could not be used in Aruba.
I think that I remember that also! Why would Tim not give Mos the results...It makes absolutely no sense unless the FBI or someone told Tim not too....  ::MonkeyNoNo::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #793 1/13/09
Post by: hotping on January 18, 2009, 06:58:21 PM
At least we haven't yet been told that those were donkey bones in the trap!


 ::MonkeyHaHa::



No.It's an extrodinarily big Hermit crab bone! ::MonkeyLaugh::

Yes, along with the often seen sneaker-fish and the mysterious phone-coral.


Good Afternoon, everyone.

I consider that Aruba may be an island surrounded by a vast watery graveyard.  

Think of all the bones that was ashore and end up in the back of a police cruiser? 

Think of all the times they fed the sharks around the island?  Who knows what was in that shark kibble?

Think of all the illegal aliens and tourists that disappear in the rough ocean water?

Think of all the runaways and human trafficing?  What happens to those people?

Who knows what gets dumped by the cruise ships?  Merchant ships?  Military ships?

Is it any wonder that 'things' just wash ashore?  Mystery items?  Where are they warehoused?  Where are they taken before and after identification?  Who in Aruba keeps track of all these items?

Remember the story of the prisioners buried at the sand dunes?  What did they do with those remains before they opened the park to the public?

imho


There's possiblilties in all that.The difference is.They went down to search for a trap/cage(really mapping the floor),as well as other targets(mapping the floor).They found a trap/cage(while mapping the ocean floor).They found in Kyle's word's.Human remains(while mapping the ocean floor).ALE comes in and swoops the contents up!Guess we'll never know who was really in that cage.That's the problem with the whole Persistence search!It wasn't about Natalee.JMOO

KEEPTHEFAITH
KTF...I Agree the Search was not about Natalee... Not for some of the players anyways...... ::MonkeyShocked::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #793 1/13/09
Post by: Keepthefaith on January 18, 2009, 07:04:42 PM
Hope all Monkey's have had a blessed sunday.With the sunshine out in Seattle.I couldn't have asked for anything more! ::MonkeyDance::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #793 1/13/09
Post by: Kermit on January 18, 2009, 07:24:11 PM
Tamikosmom
Re: Natalee Case Discussion #793 1/13/09
January 17, 2009, 06:21:44 PM »
Kermit ... who is "I".
/http://scaredmonkeys.net/index.php?topic=4371.660

lalasmom


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #793 1/13/09
Post by: Kermit on January 18, 2009, 07:25:01 PM
"I was told by a very reliable source that John is the one who paid to bring the 'witness' to the states for the polygraph(s). Was also told the underwater search for Natalee was a two-fold operation.
 (1) to search for Natalee
(2) Louis Schaefer was exploring for oil"



Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #793 1/13/09
Post by: johan555 on January 18, 2009, 07:26:49 PM
post kermit yesterday :

Beth KNOWS what I have been working on.
And I know exactly what Beth wants.

Everyone who wants to doubt or believe whatever someone else is telling them are free to do so.

Those individuals who want to call me names, be insidious will continue to do so, but it won't stop
the good people from bringing the truth out and expose the Aruba cover-up.
I believe the monkeys stand together!

++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++

a question Kermit :

Do you have contact with Peter rd Vries ?
About your research ?


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #793 1/13/09
Post by: Kermit on January 18, 2009, 07:28:10 PM
Kyle posted June 13, 2008 2:37 pm
He [John Silvetti] has been talking to polis officials and OM, but I don't know the extent lately.
He's [John Silvetti] seriously making plans to open an Aruba office so he can conduct business easier in S. America and that would allow him to do that.


The IRS filed a $22 million priority claim against Superior Offshore
http://finance.google.com/group/google.finance.708248/browse_thread/thread/6d705c29101cd2f2


KYLE WAS IN EGYPT
look at who Superior Offshore's subsidiary:
(its overseas diving subsidiary Subtech goes under in Africa, the United Arab Emirates
http://moneycentral.hoovers.com/global/msn/factsheet.xhtml?COID=152880
Superior Offshore International, Inc.
717 Texas Ave., Ste. 3150
Houston, TX 77002       
Phone: 713-910-1875
Fax: 713-910-1881
Toll Free: 877-367-5986
You could say that Superior Offshore International dives right into its work. Serving the oil and gas industry, the company specializes in subsea construction and commercial diving services (its overseas diving subsidiary Subtech goes under in Africa, the United Arab Emirates, and Latin America). Services include installation, upgrading and decommissioning of pipelines and platform infrastructure, as well as inspection, maintenance, and repair services performed by highly trained divers. Superior Offshore International serves large integrated energy companies and independent companies that specialize in oil and natural gas exploration, production, gathering, and transmission in the Gulf of Mexico.   
http://moneycentral.hoovers.com/global/msn/factsheet.xhtml?COID=152880


Jossy and John are friends.  John went to Aruba in March to attend a Mansur wedding.
/http://scaredmonkeys.net/index.php?topic=4129.300


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #793 1/13/09
Post by: Blonde on January 18, 2009, 07:29:28 PM
Hahaha  What is sun.
It's been snowing here all day, and every other say.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #793 1/13/09
Post by: Kermit on January 18, 2009, 07:29:38 PM
Did the Monkeys ever get an answer to the analysis of the material found in the cage by the Persistence, but removed and secured by the Arubans? In Particular, the material that appeared to be blue denim?scaredmonkeys.net/index.php?topic=2979.220




Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #793 1/13/09
Post by: SS on January 18, 2009, 07:30:06 PM
am I ::MonkeyConfused:: ? Is this suppose to go in Caylee's thread? SS.....you trying to drive me Nuts??  ::MonkeyHaHa::


No, Nut, I'm not trying to drive you nuts.   ::MonkeyHaHa::  I posted this for the NAH thread to see that Tim Miller and TES are having financial problems.
Thanks SS for the article.... ::MonkeyWink::




You're welcome Hotping.  I have been completely out of touch for over a week.  Has anyone
come up with anything regarding the statement from Hans Moss saying that he didn't receive polygraphs from Tim?  Does anyone know if this is true?  It doesn't sound right to me.
Its good to have You back on the forum....As far as Tim not giving the polygraph results to Mos....I have not heard anything that says whether it is true or not.... but Why would Tim not give them to Mos? And We all know that Mos is a Liar...JMHO....  ::MonkeyWink::


I've been very sick, but I'm on my way back to normal.  I read the statement from Mos.  I didn't believe it when I read it, and I just wondered if anyone had done any followup or digging.  I do recall that Tim, Jossy, and Peter met last Septemeber in Aruba.  It was days after Jossy left the first Caylee search.  The meeting was supposed to be about the witness.  Reportedly, Mos refused to meet with them, just as he did to Greta.  Tim and Peter left.  Jossy then published the two witness articles in Diario.  I haven't been able to dig anything further than this.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #793 1/13/09
Post by: hotping on January 18, 2009, 07:33:49 PM
Did the Monkeys ever get an answer to the analysis of the material found in the cage by the Persistence, but removed and secured by the Arubans? In Particular, the material that appeared to be blue denim?scaredmonkeys.net/index.php?topic=2979.220



NO.... ::MonkeyConfused::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #793 1/13/09
Post by: SS on January 18, 2009, 07:37:17 PM
am I ::MonkeyConfused:: ? Is this suppose to go in Caylee's thread? SS.....you trying to drive me Nuts??  ::MonkeyHaHa::


No, Nut, I'm not trying to drive you nuts.   ::MonkeyHaHa::  I posted this for the NAH thread to see that Tim Miller and TES are having financial problems.
Thanks SS for the article.... ::MonkeyWink::




You're welcome Hotping.  I have been completely out of touch for over a week.  Has anyone
come up with anything regarding the statement from Hans Moss saying that he didn't receive polygraphs from Tim?  Does anyone know if this is true?  It doesn't sound right to me.
Its good to have You back on the forum....As far as Tim not giving the polygraph results to Mos....I have not heard anything that says whether it is true or not.... but Why would Tim not give them to Mos? And We all know that Mos is a Liar...JMHO....  ::MonkeyWink::


I've been very sick, but I'm on my way back to normal.  I read the statement from Mos.  I didn't believe it when I read it, and I just wondered if anyone had done any followup or digging.  I do recall that Tim, Jossy, and Peter met last Septemeber in Aruba.  It was days after Jossy left the first Caylee search.  The meeting was supposed to be about the witness.  Reportedly, Mos refused to meet with them, just as he did to Greta.  Tim and Peter left.  Jossy then published the two witness articles in Diario.  I haven't been able to dig anything further than this.


Sorry !!!  edit to read, "it was days after Tim left the Caylee search".


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #793 1/13/09
Post by: WhiskeyGirl on January 18, 2009, 07:43:21 PM
At least we haven't yet been told that those were donkey bones in the trap!


 ::MonkeyHaHa::



No.It's an extrodinarily big Hermit crab bone! ::MonkeyLaugh::

Yes, along with the often seen sneaker-fish and the mysterious phone-coral.


Good Afternoon, everyone.

I consider that Aruba may be an island surrounded by a vast watery graveyard.  

Think of all the bones that was ashore and end up in the back of a police cruiser? 

Think of all the times they fed the sharks around the island?  Who knows what was in that shark kibble?

Think of all the illegal aliens and tourists that disappear in the rough ocean water?

Think of all the runaways and human trafficing?  What happens to those people?

Who knows what gets dumped by the cruise ships?  Merchant ships?  Military ships?

Is it any wonder that 'things' just wash ashore?  Mystery items?  Where are they warehoused?  Where are they taken before and after identification?  Who in Aruba keeps track of all these items?

Remember the story of the prisioners buried at the sand dunes?  What did they do with those remains before they opened the park to the public?

imho


There's possiblilties in all that.The difference is.They went down to search for a trap/cage(really mapping the floor),as well as other targets(mapping the floor).They found a trap/cage(while mapping the ocean floor).They found in Kyle's word's.Human remains(while mapping the ocean floor).ALE comes in and swoops the contents up!Guess we'll never know who was really in that cage.That's the problem with the whole Persistence search!It wasn't about Natalee.JMOO

KEEPTHEFAITH

I still have faith that the Persistence search was for Natalee.  I think there is a possibility that she is in one of the other targets.   What commercial purpose would there be in looking at any specific target?  If they were mapping the floor, that was done.

How many cages/traps may still be down there?  Perhaps that was a common method of body disposal, second to maybe to caves, fire, self-mutilation, and hanging?

It seems unlikely to me that they would find Natalee with the first target.  If there intention was just to map, why worry about cage dimensions or zeroing in on fewer targets?  Why let the media or Tim on the boat at all?

It seems like the 'remains' in the first target/cage/trap may be an effort by some to prevent further searches for the truth that remain on the ocean floor around Aruba.

I've never seen anything that describes what the other targets look like.  The result of the remains, irregardless of to whom they may belong, is that the ocean search appears to be over for Natalee.  I suspect she is still out there.

PJ2K still have the opportunity to tell the truth, as do others on Aruba, including those in government, the prosecutors office, and the judiciary, all past and present involved in this case.

just my humble opinions


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #793 1/13/09
Post by: johan555 on January 18, 2009, 07:47:42 PM
post kermit yesterday :

Beth KNOWS what I have been working on.
And I know exactly what Beth wants.

Everyone who wants to doubt or believe whatever someone else is telling them are free to do so.

Those individuals who want to call me names, be insidious will continue to do so, but it won't stop
the good people from bringing the truth out and expose the Aruba cover-up.
I believe the monkeys stand together!

++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++

a question Kermit :

Do you have contact with Peter rd Vries ?
About your research ?


a frog  LOL


Edit:  Attack the post and not the poster


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #793 1/13/09
Post by: Keepthefaith on January 18, 2009, 07:50:12 PM
At least we haven't yet been told that those were donkey bones in the trap!


 ::MonkeyHaHa::



No.It's an extrodinarily big Hermit crab bone! ::MonkeyLaugh::

Yes, along with the often seen sneaker-fish and the mysterious phone-coral.


Good Afternoon, everyone.

I consider that Aruba may be an island surrounded by a vast watery graveyard.  

Think of all the bones that was ashore and end up in the back of a police cruiser? 

Think of all the times they fed the sharks around the island?  Who knows what was in that shark kibble?

Think of all the illegal aliens and tourists that disappear in the rough ocean water?

Think of all the runaways and human trafficing?  What happens to those people?

Who knows what gets dumped by the cruise ships?  Merchant ships?  Military ships?

Is it any wonder that 'things' just wash ashore?  Mystery items?  Where are they warehoused?  Where are they taken before and after identification?  Who in Aruba keeps track of all these items?

Remember the story of the prisioners buried at the sand dunes?  What did they do with those remains before they opened the park to the public?

imho


There's possiblilties in all that.The difference is.They went down to search for a trap/cage(really mapping the floor),as well as other targets(mapping the floor).They found a trap/cage(while mapping the ocean floor).They found in Kyle's word's.Human remains(while mapping the ocean floor).ALE comes in and swoops the contents up!Guess we'll never know who was really in that cage.That's the problem with the whole Persistence search!It wasn't about Natalee.JMOO

KEEPTHEFAITH

I still have faith that the Persistence search was for Natalee.  I think there is a possibility that she is in one of the other targets.   What commercial purpose would there be in looking at any specific target?  If they were mapping the floor, that was done.

How many cages/traps may still be down there?  Perhaps that was a common method of body disposal, second to maybe to caves, fire, self-mutilation, and hanging?

It seems unlikely to me that they would find Natalee with the first target.  If there intention was just to map, why worry about cage dimensions or zeroing in on fewer targets?  Why let the media or Tim on the boat at all?

It seems like the 'remains' in the first target/cage/trap may be an effort by some to prevent further searches for the truth that remain on the ocean floor around Aruba.

I've never seen anything that describes what the other targets look like.  The result of the remains, irregardless of to whom they may belong, is that the ocean search appears to be over for Natalee.  I suspect she is still out there.

PJ2K still have the opportunity to tell the truth, as do others on Aruba, including those in government, the prosecutors office, and the judiciary, all past and present involved in this case.

just my humble opinions

1.It seems you think the cage is a diversion?Correct?
2.You don't trust Kyle's professional opinion?
2.Seems to me that there won't be any other searches in the ocean for Natalee.Not from the Persistence anyway!


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #793 1/13/09
Post by: bastibro on January 18, 2009, 07:51:31 PM
post kermit yesterday :

Beth KNOWS what I have been working on.
And I know exactly what Beth wants.

Everyone who wants to doubt or believe whatever someone else is telling them are free to do so.

Those individuals who want to call me names, be insidious will continue to do so, but it won't stop
the good people from bringing the truth out and expose the Aruba cover-up.
I believe the monkeys stand together!

++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++

a question Kermit :

Do you have contact with Peter rd Vries ?
About your research ?


a frog ! LOL

                             

That`s often the case IMO  ::MonkeyHaHa::

Edit:  Attack the post not the poster.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #793 1/13/09
Post by: bastibro on January 18, 2009, 07:58:16 PM
It sometimes make me wonder  ::MonkeyHaHa::


Edited to remove personal attack against another poster.

Attack the post, not the poster


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #793 1/13/09
Post by: hotping on January 18, 2009, 08:08:51 PM
It sometimes make me wonder ::MonkeyHaHa::

  ::MonkeyHaHa:: Not!

Edited to remove personal attack against another poster.

Attack the post, not the poster.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #793 1/13/09
Post by: 2NJSons_Mom on January 18, 2009, 08:15:31 PM
It sometimes make me wonder  ::MonkeyHaHa::



This isn't funny, imo.   ::MonkeyNoNo::

Edited to remove personal attack against another poster.

Attack the post, not the poster.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #793 1/13/09
Post by: MuffyBee on January 18, 2009, 08:15:46 PM
bastibro ~  Attack the post, not the poster. 


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #793 1/13/09
Post by: texasmom on January 18, 2009, 08:18:07 PM


I've been very sick, but I'm on my way back to normal.  I read the statement from Mos.  I didn't believe it when I read it, and I just wondered if anyone had done any followup or digging.  I do recall that Tim, Jossy, and Peter met last Septemeber in Aruba.  It was days after Jossy left the first Caylee search.  The meeting was supposed to be about the witness.  Reportedly, Mos refused to meet with them, just as he did to Greta.  Tim and Peter left.  Jossy then published the two witness articles in Diario.  I haven't been able to dig anything further than this.

http://scaredmonkeys.net/index.php?topic=4239.740

Posted by SS

Re: Natalee Case Discussion #785 12/13/08 -
« Reply #748 on: December 16, 2008, 08:31:12 PM »

Quote
Hi Mags - at the time, I understood that Caps was speaking for Jossy and the group that mt in the beginning of Septmeber.  It was the day after Tim left Orlando after the first search.  Caps, Jossy, the witness(es), Caps, and Silvetti were all together and wanted to meet with Mos.  Mos wouldn't meet with them.  We also heard the Peter deVries was there.   For the next two weeks, Jossy printed Parts 1 and 2 about the witness.  Caps told us that Parts 3, 4, and 5 would follow and that they would expose Paulass.  We never saw them.  He also alluded to Peter's newest program on Urine that ultimately aired in the beginning of November.  Greta's program followed.  I haven't heard anything about Peter's program being shown here in the US.  There haven't been any additional Diario articles.  Mos doesn't recognize the witnesses.  The time frame to close the investigation has supposedly been extended to January, but nothing is happening.  Mos will be gone in January.

Posted by Magnolia
Re: Natalee Case Discussion #785 12/13/08 -
« Reply #750 on: December 16, 2008, 08:45:21 PM »

Quote
I remember Caps post about parts 3-4 & 5 to follow, but I
did not think that Jossy had said that.
I also remember Caps post about Me, J, W, and c's.
I don't remember about Jossy being at that meeting or deVries.
Where did that information come from.

Response from SS
Re: Natalee Case Discussion #785 12/13/08 -
« Reply #753 on: December 16, 2008, 08:51:11 PM »   


Quote
It was a "secret" at the time, but it eventually leaked out.  Tim was at the meeting also, but he left when Mos wouldn't meet with them and he returned to the storm damage in Texas.


I asked Caps specifically about this after the above posts and he told me that Peter was not at this meeting.  There's a mix up somewhere.   ::MonkeyConfused:: 




Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #793 1/13/09
Post by: texasmom on January 18, 2009, 08:20:22 PM
It sometimes make me wonder ::MonkeyHaHa::


What's up with that?   ::MonkeyNoNo::

Edited to remove personal attack against another poster.


Attack the post, not the poster.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #793 1/13/09
Post by: Blue Moon on January 18, 2009, 08:20:45 PM
Kyle posted June 13, 2008 2:37 pm
He [John Silvetti] has been talking to polis officials and OM, but I don't know the extent lately.
He's [John Silvetti] seriously making plans to open an Aruba office so he can conduct business easier in S. America and that would allow him to do that.


The IRS filed a $22 million priority claim against Superior Offshore
http://finance.google.com/group/google.finance.708248/browse_thread/thread/6d705c29101cd2f2


KYLE WAS IN EGYPT
look at who Superior Offshore's subsidiary:
(its overseas diving subsidiary Subtech goes under in Africa, the United Arab Emirates
http://moneycentral.hoovers.com/global/msn/factsheet.xhtml?COID=152880
Superior Offshore International, Inc.
717 Texas Ave., Ste. 3150
Houston, TX 77002       
Phone: 713-910-1875
Fax: 713-910-1881
Toll Free: 877-367-5986
You could say that Superior Offshore International dives right into its work. Serving the oil and gas industry, the company specializes in subsea construction and commercial diving services (its overseas diving subsidiary Subtech goes under in Africa, the United Arab Emirates, and Latin America). Services include installation, upgrading and decommissioning of pipelines and platform infrastructure, as well as inspection, maintenance, and repair services performed by highly trained divers. Superior Offshore International serves large integrated energy companies and independent companies that specialize in oil and natural gas exploration, production, gathering, and transmission in the Gulf of Mexico.   
http://moneycentral.hoovers.com/global/msn/factsheet.xhtml?COID=152880


Jossy and John are friends.  John went to Aruba in March to attend a Mansur wedding.
/http://scaredmonkeys.net/index.php?topic=4129.300

SO I am NOT bashing Jossy if I question his connections to John and the Persistence?


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #793 1/13/09
Post by: texasmom on January 18, 2009, 08:23:01 PM
Kyle posted June 13, 2008 2:37 pm
He [John Silvetti] has been talking to polis officials and OM, but I don't know the extent lately.
He's [John Silvetti] seriously making plans to open an Aruba office so he can conduct business easier in S. America and that would allow him to do that.


The IRS filed a $22 million priority claim against Superior Offshore
http://finance.google.com/group/google.finance.708248/browse_thread/thread/6d705c29101cd2f2


KYLE WAS IN EGYPT
look at who Superior Offshore's subsidiary:
(its overseas diving subsidiary Subtech goes under in Africa, the United Arab Emirates
http://moneycentral.hoovers.com/global/msn/factsheet.xhtml?COID=152880
Superior Offshore International, Inc.
717 Texas Ave., Ste. 3150
Houston, TX 77002       
Phone: 713-910-1875
Fax: 713-910-1881
Toll Free: 877-367-5986
You could say that Superior Offshore International dives right into its work. Serving the oil and gas industry, the company specializes in subsea construction and commercial diving services (its overseas diving subsidiary Subtech goes under in Africa, the United Arab Emirates, and Latin America). Services include installation, upgrading and decommissioning of pipelines and platform infrastructure, as well as inspection, maintenance, and repair services performed by highly trained divers. Superior Offshore International serves large integrated energy companies and independent companies that specialize in oil and natural gas exploration, production, gathering, and transmission in the Gulf of Mexico.   
http://moneycentral.hoovers.com/global/msn/factsheet.xhtml?COID=152880


Jossy and John are friends.  John went to Aruba in March to attend a Mansur wedding.
/http://scaredmonkeys.net/index.php?topic=4129.300

SO I am NOT bashing Jossy if I question his connections to John and the Persistence?

I don't think you are Blue Moon, I've questioned it myself.   ::MonkeyCool::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #793 1/13/09
Post by: texasmom on January 18, 2009, 08:26:00 PM

Me thinks some monkeys have been drinking the kool-aid!    ::MonkeyTongue:: ::MonkeyHaHa:: 


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #793 1/13/09
Post by: KYcat on January 18, 2009, 08:26:43 PM
Kyle posted June 13, 2008 2:37 pm
He [John Silvetti] has been talking to polis officials and OM, but I don't know the extent lately.
He's [John Silvetti] seriously making plans to open an Aruba office so he can conduct business easier in S. America and that would allow him to do that.


The IRS filed a $22 million priority claim against Superior Offshore
http://finance.google.com/group/google.finance.708248/browse_thread/thread/6d705c29101cd2f2


KYLE WAS IN EGYPT
look at who Superior Offshore's subsidiary:
(its overseas diving subsidiary Subtech goes under in Africa, the United Arab Emirates
http://moneycentral.hoovers.com/global/msn/factsheet.xhtml?COID=152880
Superior Offshore International, Inc.
717 Texas Ave., Ste. 3150
Houston, TX 77002       
Phone: 713-910-1875
Fax: 713-910-1881
Toll Free: 877-367-5986
You could say that Superior Offshore International dives right into its work. Serving the oil and gas industry, the company specializes in subsea construction and commercial diving services (its overseas diving subsidiary Subtech goes under in Africa, the United Arab Emirates, and Latin America). Services include installation, upgrading and decommissioning of pipelines and platform infrastructure, as well as inspection, maintenance, and repair services performed by highly trained divers. Superior Offshore International serves large integrated energy companies and independent companies that specialize in oil and natural gas exploration, production, gathering, and transmission in the Gulf of Mexico.   
http://moneycentral.hoovers.com/global/msn/factsheet.xhtml?COID=152880


Jossy and John are friends.  John went to Aruba in March to attend a Mansur wedding.
/http://scaredmonkeys.net/index.php?topic=4129.300

SO I am NOT bashing Jossy if I question his connections to John and the Persistence?

Now that depends on who you ask Blue ..... I questioned the connection between Jossy and John Silvetti and the fact that John attended a Mansur wedding......... Hotshot claimed they didn't know each other until she put them in touch with each other IIRC and she said "no way" did John attend a Mansur wedding.  Go figure.........

I say you are NOT BASHING........ ASK AWAY..........

 ::MonkeyWink::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #793 1/13/09
Post by: bastibro on January 18, 2009, 08:28:25 PM
bastibro ~  Attack the post, not the poster. 

I`m sorry, thanks for putting me in place ::MonkeyWink::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #793 1/13/09
Post by: 2NJSons_Mom on January 18, 2009, 08:28:30 PM
bastibro or Johan555,

Can you back up your negative posts toward Kermit with something that is worthy of thinking about?    ::MonkeyRoll::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #793 1/13/09
Post by: Keepthefaith on January 18, 2009, 08:29:23 PM
OK.I'll ask the question.How did Jossy and John become such fast friends? ::MonkeyCool::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #793 1/13/09
Post by: texasmom on January 18, 2009, 08:29:32 PM
It sometimes make me wonder ::MonkeyHaHa::

What's up with that?   ::MonkeyNoNo::

Edited to remove personal attack against another poster.


Attack the post, not the poster.

JMO, but the pictures are an attack too.  Both of them, I'm disappointed in Johan and Bastibro's choice of humor tonight; if that's what it was.
 ::MonkeyNoNo::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #793 1/13/09
Post by: KYcat on January 18, 2009, 08:29:43 PM
Now that depends on who you ask Blue ..... I questioned the connection between Jossy and John Silvetti and the fact that John attended a Mansur wedding......... Hotshot claimed they didn't know each other until she put them in touch with each other IIRC and she said "no way" did John attend a Mansur wedding.  Go figure.........

I say you are NOT BASHING........ ASK AWAY..........

Self Edit:  Maybe Hotshot put John in contact with CAPS but either way the jest was that Jossy and John did not know each other.  I always ask strangers to my family weddings, don't you???   

 ::MonkeyHaHa::

 


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #793 1/13/09
Post by: MuffyBee on January 18, 2009, 08:30:54 PM

Me thinks some monkeys have been drinking the kool-aid!    ::MonkeyTongue:: ::MonkeyHaHa:: 

I've edited a post and the quotes, if that is what you are referring to texasmom. 


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #793 1/13/09
Post by: Blue Moon on January 18, 2009, 08:32:07 PM
Kyle posted June 13, 2008 2:37 pm
He [John Silvetti] has been talking to polis officials and OM, but I don't know the extent lately.
He's [John Silvetti] seriously making plans to open an Aruba office so he can conduct business easier in S. America and that would allow him to do that.


The IRS filed a $22 million priority claim against Superior Offshore
http://finance.google.com/group/google.finance.708248/browse_thread/thread/6d705c29101cd2f2


KYLE WAS IN EGYPT
look at who Superior Offshore's subsidiary:
(its overseas diving subsidiary Subtech goes under in Africa, the United Arab Emirates
http://moneycentral.hoovers.com/global/msn/factsheet.xhtml?COID=152880
Superior Offshore International, Inc.
717 Texas Ave., Ste. 3150
Houston, TX 77002       
Phone: 713-910-1875
Fax: 713-910-1881
Toll Free: 877-367-5986
You could say that Superior Offshore International dives right into its work. Serving the oil and gas industry, the company specializes in subsea construction and commercial diving services (its overseas diving subsidiary Subtech goes under in Africa, the United Arab Emirates, and Latin America). Services include installation, upgrading and decommissioning of pipelines and platform infrastructure, as well as inspection, maintenance, and repair services performed by highly trained divers. Superior Offshore International serves large integrated energy companies and independent companies that specialize in oil and natural gas exploration, production, gathering, and transmission in the Gulf of Mexico.   
http://moneycentral.hoovers.com/global/msn/factsheet.xhtml?COID=152880


Jossy and John are friends.  John went to Aruba in March to attend a Mansur wedding.
/http://scaredmonkeys.net/index.php?topic=4129.300

SO I am NOT bashing Jossy if I question his connections to John and the Persistence?

Now that depends on who you ask Blue ..... I questioned the connection between Jossy and John Silvetti and the fact that John attended a Mansur wedding......... Hotshot claimed they didn't know each other until she put them in touch with each other IIRC and she said "no way" did John attend a Mansur wedding.  Go figure.........

I say you are NOT BASHING........ ASK AWAY..........

 ::MonkeyWink::

I remember you questioning that also.  Appears to me we two get bashed if we question Jossy.  I am having a hard time understanding why certain people cannot be questioned without someone going off the deep end.  I don't believe we are bashing them, just asking questions to better understand what actually occurred with the Persistence and the players on Aruba (no matter who that may be).


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #793 1/13/09
Post by: Nut44x4 on January 18, 2009, 08:32:46 PM
O/T  This is a way cool tool for describing 'subjects' looks. Like your very own Perp tool, lol.

http://flashface.ctapt.de/


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #793 1/13/09
Post by: MuffyBee on January 18, 2009, 08:32:55 PM
It sometimes make me wonder ::MonkeyHaHa::

What's up with that?   ::MonkeyNoNo::

Edited to remove personal attack against another poster.


Attack the post, not the poster.

JMO, but the pictures are an attack too.  Both of them, I'm disappointed in Johan and Bastibro's choice of humor tonight; if that's what it was.
 ::MonkeyNoNo::

Yes, they are both personal attacks, and I will take care of Johan's too.  I don't consider this humor.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #793 1/13/09
Post by: KYcat on January 18, 2009, 08:33:51 PM
OK.I'll ask the question.How did Jossy and John become such fast friends? ::MonkeyCool::

Makes you go hmmmmmmmmmmmmm,  don't it

Got to be an oil connection MOO



Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #793 1/13/09
Post by: texasmom on January 18, 2009, 08:34:19 PM
Kyle posted June 13, 2008 2:37 pm
He [John Silvetti] has been talking to polis officials and OM, but I don't know the extent lately.
He's [John Silvetti] seriously making plans to open an Aruba office so he can conduct business easier in S. America and that would allow him to do that.


The IRS filed a $22 million priority claim against Superior Offshore
http://finance.google.com/group/google.finance.708248/browse_thread/thread/6d705c29101cd2f2


KYLE WAS IN EGYPT
look at who Superior Offshore's subsidiary:
(its overseas diving subsidiary Subtech goes under in Africa, the United Arab Emirates
http://moneycentral.hoovers.com/global/msn/factsheet.xhtml?COID=152880
Superior Offshore International, Inc.
717 Texas Ave., Ste. 3150
Houston, TX 77002       
Phone: 713-910-1875
Fax: 713-910-1881
Toll Free: 877-367-5986
You could say that Superior Offshore International dives right into its work. Serving the oil and gas industry, the company specializes in subsea construction and commercial diving services (its overseas diving subsidiary Subtech goes under in Africa, the United Arab Emirates, and Latin America). Services include installation, upgrading and decommissioning of pipelines and platform infrastructure, as well as inspection, maintenance, and repair services performed by highly trained divers. Superior Offshore International serves large integrated energy companies and independent companies that specialize in oil and natural gas exploration, production, gathering, and transmission in the Gulf of Mexico.   
http://moneycentral.hoovers.com/global/msn/factsheet.xhtml?COID=152880


Jossy and John are friends.  John went to Aruba in March to attend a Mansur wedding.
/http://scaredmonkeys.net/index.php?topic=4129.300

SO I am NOT bashing Jossy if I question his connections to John and the Persistence?

Now that depends on who you ask Blue ..... I questioned the connection between Jossy and John Silvetti and the fact that John attended a Mansur wedding......... Hotshot claimed they didn't know each other until she put them in touch with each other IIRC and she said "no way" did John attend a Mansur wedding.  Go figure.........

I say you are NOT BASHING........ ASK AWAY..........

 ::MonkeyWink::

If that's what Hotshot said about the wedding, I believe I was told differently.  I KNOW I was told that John met with Jossy that weekend, I'll have to check on the wedding part again.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #793 1/13/09
Post by: klaasend on January 18, 2009, 08:34:45 PM
Bastibro and Johan - rather than making fun of fellow members that you don't happen to agree with why don't you post your reasons why with documented proof?


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #793 1/13/09
Post by: Blue Moon on January 18, 2009, 08:36:39 PM
What time frame was the refinery on Aruba going to sold or closed?  Does this trip by the Persistence coincide with the problems at the refinery?


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #793 1/13/09
Post by: Keepthefaith on January 18, 2009, 08:37:09 PM
OK.I'll ask the question.How did Jossy and John become such fast friends? ::MonkeyCool::

Makes you go hmmmmmmmmmmmmm,  don't it

Got to be an oil connection MOO



1.Jossy has done a lot of exporting/importing in and out of South America.You would think he has plenty of connections for OIL.
2.John Silvetti just mapped the ocean floor and has the underwater expertise.

Makes you go hmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm,Don't it

3.Don't forget Kyle's expertise.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #793 1/13/09
Post by: KYcat on January 18, 2009, 08:37:58 PM
Kyle posted June 13, 2008 2:37 pm
He [John Silvetti] has been talking to polis officials and OM, but I don't know the extent lately.
He's [John Silvetti] seriously making plans to open an Aruba office so he can conduct business easier in S. America and that would allow him to do that.


The IRS filed a $22 million priority claim against Superior Offshore
http://finance.google.com/group/google.finance.708248/browse_thread/thread/6d705c29101cd2f2


KYLE WAS IN EGYPT
look at who Superior Offshore's subsidiary:
(its overseas diving subsidiary Subtech goes under in Africa, the United Arab Emirates
http://moneycentral.hoovers.com/global/msn/factsheet.xhtml?COID=152880
Superior Offshore International, Inc.
717 Texas Ave., Ste. 3150
Houston, TX 77002       
Phone: 713-910-1875
Fax: 713-910-1881
Toll Free: 877-367-5986
You could say that Superior Offshore International dives right into its work. Serving the oil and gas industry, the company specializes in subsea construction and commercial diving services (its overseas diving subsidiary Subtech goes under in Africa, the United Arab Emirates, and Latin America). Services include installation, upgrading and decommissioning of pipelines and platform infrastructure, as well as inspection, maintenance, and repair services performed by highly trained divers. Superior Offshore International serves large integrated energy companies and independent companies that specialize in oil and natural gas exploration, production, gathering, and transmission in the Gulf of Mexico.   
http://moneycentral.hoovers.com/global/msn/factsheet.xhtml?COID=152880


Jossy and John are friends.  John went to Aruba in March to attend a Mansur wedding.
/http://scaredmonkeys.net/index.php?topic=4129.300

SO I am NOT bashing Jossy if I question his connections to John and the Persistence?

Now that depends on who you ask Blue ..... I questioned the connection between Jossy and John Silvetti and the fact that John attended a Mansur wedding......... Hotshot claimed they didn't know each other until she put them in touch with each other IIRC and she said "no way" did John attend a Mansur wedding.  Go figure.........

I say you are NOT BASHING........ ASK AWAY..........

 ::MonkeyWink::

If that's what Hotshot said about the wedding, I believe I was told differently.  I KNOW I was told that John met with Jossy that weekend, I'll have to check on the wedding part again.

Hi TXMom I'll have to look also, and I'm slow, but I shall return!!

 ::MonkeyRoll::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #793 1/13/09
Post by: Tamikosmom on January 18, 2009, 08:38:59 PM
Tamikosmom
Re: Natalee Case Discussion #793 1/13/09
January 17, 2009, 06:21:44 PM »
Kermit ... who is "I".
/http://scaredmonkeys.net/index.php?topic=4371.660

lalasmom

Thanks Kermit.

Janet
5:40 PM PT


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #793 1/13/09
Post by: bastibro on January 18, 2009, 08:40:55 PM
bastibro or Johan555,

Can you back up your negative posts toward Kermit with something that is worthy of thinking about?    ::MonkeyRoll::

Yes! I think its time for her to stop bashing Kyle the whole time.
Kyle has chose to not defend himself here at SM and thats his right.
Everything here seems to be about the Kyle and the Persistence issue, thats what irritates me.
I`m convinced this will lead to . . nothing!
I`m sorry, that`s my opinion


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #793 1/13/09
Post by: Tamikosmom on January 18, 2009, 08:42:34 PM
OK.I'll ask the question.How did Jossy and John become such fast friends? ::MonkeyCool::

Makes you go hmmmmmmmmmmmmm,  don't it

Got to be an oil connection MOO



 ::MonkeyWaa::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #793 1/13/09
Post by: Nut44x4 on January 18, 2009, 08:43:18 PM
(http://i25.photobucket.com/albums/c100/crazybabyborgs/MOD/modlock4.gif)


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #793 1/13/09
Post by: MuffyBee on January 18, 2009, 08:44:48 PM
bastibro or Johan555,

Can you back up your negative posts toward Kermit with something that is worthy of thinking about?    ::MonkeyRoll::

Yes! I think its time for her to stop bashing Kyle the whole time.
Kyle has chose to not defend himself here at SM and thats his right.
Everything here seems to be about the Kyle and the Persistence issue, thats what irritates me.
I`m convinced this will lead to . . nothing!
I`m sorry, that`s my opinion

I have not seen Kermit bash Kyle.  But I have seen YOU bash Kermit with a very childish cartoon intimating she's a drug user.  NOT ALLOWED!


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #793 1/13/09
Post by: klaasend on January 18, 2009, 08:45:37 PM
bastibro or Johan555,

Can you back up your negative posts toward Kermit with something that is worthy of thinking about?    ::MonkeyRoll::

Yes! I think its time for her to stop bashing Kyle the whole time.
Kyle has chose to not defend himself here at SM and thats his right.
Everything here seems to be about the Kyle and the Persistence issue, thats what irritates me.
I`m convinced this will lead to . . nothing!
I`m sorry, that`s my opinion

Bastibro - after nearly 4 years I doubt if ANYTHING will lead to ANYTHING.  One thing for certain from the posts of Kyle, he certainly wasn't going to help either.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #793 1/13/09
Post by: texasmom on January 18, 2009, 08:47:33 PM
OK.I'll ask the question.How did Jossy and John become such fast friends? ::MonkeyCool::

Makes you go hmmmmmmmmmmmmm,  don't it

Got to be an oil connection MOO



 ::MonkeyWaa::

I know how you feel Janet, but we need to look at this connection.  I had faith in Jossy too. 

 :smt056


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #793 1/13/09
Post by: Keepthefaith on January 18, 2009, 08:50:03 PM
bastibro or Johan555,

Can you back up your negative posts toward Kermit with something that is worthy of thinking about?    ::MonkeyRoll::

Yes! I think its time for her to stop bashing Kyle the whole time.
Kyle has chose to not defend himself here at SM and thats his right.
Everything here seems to be about the Kyle and the Persistence issue, thats what irritates me.
I`m convinced this will lead to . . nothing!
I`m sorry, that`s my opinion

Tell us why we shouldn't question Kyle,as well as the Persistence Bastibro?Kyle said the things he did.KYLE OPENED THE DOOR WIDE OPEN TO BE QUESTIONED BASTIBRO!I know ,or think your intelligent enough to understand that!


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #793 1/13/09
Post by: Keepthefaith on January 18, 2009, 08:52:44 PM
OK.I'll ask the question.How did Jossy and John become such fast friends? ::MonkeyCool::

Makes you go hmmmmmmmmmmmmm,  don't it

Got to be an oil connection MOO



 ::MonkeyWaa::

I know how you feel Janet, but we need to look at this connection.  I had faith in Jossy too. 

 :smt056

Ditto.The Mansur's are to much of a fixture on that island to not be attached somewhere.

1.Jossy
2.Eduardo
3.Serge
4.Luis
5.Eric


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #793 1/13/09
Post by: Nut44x4 on January 18, 2009, 08:55:23 PM
Lots of shoveling to do tomorrow  ::MonkeyWaa::  Night all.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #793 1/13/09
Post by: Blue Moon on January 18, 2009, 08:55:26 PM
I can accept that Kyle does not feel the need to defend himself here.  But he needs to be man enough to defend himself to Beth Holloway.  He spouted out those comments on an internet website (which is NO guarantee of being secure) that he wanted the information put together so Beth would know what happened.  He couldn't put the words together by himself yet he could do it on a forum with total strangers.  Man up and own up to what happened on that ship is all anyone is asking.  The old saying:  If it walks like a duck, quakes like a duck, ....................   (sorry Janet, no offense to your duck)


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #793 1/13/09
Post by: Keepthefaith on January 18, 2009, 08:56:39 PM
Lots of shoveling to do tomorrow  ::MonkeyWaa::  Night all.

Night Nut.Better you then me! ::MonkeyLaugh:: The Sun was shining in godd ol' Seattle!


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #793 1/13/09
Post by: texasmom on January 18, 2009, 08:57:03 PM
Lots of shoveling to do tomorrow  ::MonkeyWaa::  Night all.

Sorry you've got that to look forward to tomorrow.  I know that's hard work!

Goodnight Nut!   ::MonkeyCool::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #793 1/13/09
Post by: hotping on January 18, 2009, 08:59:42 PM
Good Night Nut! It was 72 degrees today here in South Central Texas with Blue Skies! First Blue Skies We've seen in awhile....  ::MonkeyCool::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #793 1/13/09
Post by: klaasend on January 18, 2009, 09:03:27 PM
DANA PRETZER - ON NOW

http://scaredmonkeysradio.com/radio.m3u


(http://i118.photobucket.com/albums/o100/klaasen3/Sub5/Pretzer.jpg)


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #793 1/13/09
Post by: Tamikosmom on January 18, 2009, 09:03:34 PM
bastibro or Johan555,

Can you back up your negative posts toward Kermit with something that is worthy of thinking about?    ::MonkeyRoll::

Yes! I think its time for her to stop bashing Kyle the whole time.
Kyle has chose to not defend himself here at SM and thats his right.
Everything here seems to be about the Kyle and the Persistence issue, thats what irritates me.
I`m convinced this will lead to . . nothing!
I`m sorry, that`s my opinion

bastibro,

Kermit is not bashing Kyle!  She/he has revealed Kyle Kingmans own word's which expose the deception of the John Silvetti in regards to his participation in the finale' to the great Aruban coverup ... the finale' to the great Aruban coverup that implies that the opportunity to bring Natalee Holloway home to rest on American soil may have been lost forever.

Think about it bastibro.  Just try to put yourself in the place of Natalee Holloway's family.  I do believe that Kyle Kingman's own words would be devasting?  I also believe that you would be angry at Kyle for not immediately reporting the obstruction of justice to the proper authorties as well as sharing it with you.   

Janet

++++++


KYLE KINGMAN - IN HIS OWN WORDS

Kyle:
  I took the proportions of the body form from the head, to shoulder, to a 90 degree angle which I believed to be the hem line of Natalee's skirt. I then took those proportions and matched them to the photo of Natalee with what she was last seen wearing. The proportions matched within an inch from head, to shoulder, to skirt line. Based on this comparison and with what we believed we saw in the Dec 29th video, Tim Miller contacted the family and told them the 99.9% comment. I told Tim not to do anything until we have forensic results back after the site is processed. Jan 7th we sampled the contents and in my opinion we found the skirt under the sand along with the other items The blue fabric was found right where the skirt is pictured. If it isn't her, it will forever haunt me as a major cosmic WTF.

Kyle:  I get done in the survey room backing up the ROV dive and head to the back deck to talk to the Polis divers and see what they sampled and see the Polis boat way in the distance heading away fast. John doesn't seem concerned at all, but I am very dissapointed, concerned, and burning inside because I have a feeling that I/we will never know what they took from the trap. That evening I talked to John asking when we plan on recovering the trap. Previously this was part of the talks and plan, but this time he doesn't seem concerned about ever looking into the trap further. After John verbally BASHED me about the trap for what I said to Tim Miller about the sand body-form and that I believed her skirt was under the sand, John pretty much committed himself to the belief the trap wasn't what we were after. This shocked me because it was exactly what we were looking for- a fish trap lost at sea with human remains.

Kyle:  John is not a believer in the trap. He took ALE's word as gospel that it wasn't case related, yet never studied the videos or bothered to inquire further. He had plans on doing business with Aruba and in S. America and he didn't want to hurt any feelings by talks hinting at lack of complete trust and friendship.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #793 1/13/09
Post by: Keepthefaith on January 18, 2009, 09:04:02 PM
bastibro or Johan555,

Can you back up your negative posts toward Kermit with something that is worthy of thinking about?    ::MonkeyRoll::

Yes! I think its time for her to stop bashing Kyle the whole time.
Kyle has chose to not defend himself here at SM and thats his right.
Everything here seems to be about the Kyle and the Persistence issue, thats what irritates me.
I`m convinced this will lead to . . nothing!
I`m sorry, that`s my opinion

Tell me what is worthy of thinking about in that post Bastibro?What do you want to talk about?I'm still patiently waiting.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #793 1/13/09
Post by: San on January 18, 2009, 09:04:48 PM
bastibro or Johan555,

Can you back up your negative posts toward Kermit with something that is worthy of thinking about?    ::MonkeyRoll::

Yes! I think its time for her to stop bashing Kyle the whole time.
Kyle has chose to not defend himself here at SM and thats his right.
Everything here seems to be about the Kyle and the Persistence issue, thats what irritates me.
I`m convinced this will lead to . . nothing!
I`m sorry, that`s my opinion

Kyle planted his ass at Chat and Grumble with a few other former SM posters.  I guess it is ok for him to discuss it over there.

We understand your opinion and how this might frustrate you and this is why I say skip the posts.  We cannot be forced not to discuss a subject just because someone doesn't agree with it.  There are other people who think otherwise.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #793 1/13/09
Post by: Keepthefaith on January 18, 2009, 09:05:43 PM
bastibro or Johan555,

Can you back up your negative posts toward Kermit with something that is worthy of thinking about?    ::MonkeyRoll::

Yes! I think its time for her to stop bashing Kyle the whole time.
Kyle has chose to not defend himself here at SM and thats his right.
Everything here seems to be about the Kyle and the Persistence issue, thats what irritates me.
I`m convinced this will lead to . . nothing!
I`m sorry, that`s my opinion

Tell me what is worthy of thinking about in that post Bastibro?What do you want to talk about?I'm still patiently waiting.

Maybe i'll have to wait for another day.I just hope Johan and Bastibro aren't part of the Hidey-hole crowd.Now that would be disappointing! ::MonkeyNoNo::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #793 1/13/09
Post by: 2NJSons_Mom on January 18, 2009, 09:06:44 PM
bastibro or Johan555,

Can you back up your negative posts toward Kermit with something that is worthy of thinking about?    ::MonkeyRoll::

Yes! I think its time for her to stop bashing Kyle the whole time.
Kyle has chose to not defend himself here at SM and thats his right.
Everything here seems to be about the Kyle and the Persistence issue, thats what irritates me.
I`m convinced this will lead to . . nothing!
I`m sorry, that`s my opinion

Okay, you are irritated....Start another course of conversation.  As a member, you are welcome to bring your ideas and research to the forum.  Go for it. 


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #793 1/13/09
Post by: Blue Moon on January 18, 2009, 09:06:57 PM
bastibro or Johan555,

Can you back up your negative posts toward Kermit with something that is worthy of thinking about?    ::MonkeyRoll::

Yes! I think its time for her to stop bashing Kyle the whole time.
Kyle has chose to not defend himself here at SM and thats his right.
Everything here seems to be about the Kyle and the Persistence issue, thats what irritates me.
I`m convinced this will lead to . . nothing!
I`m sorry, that`s my opinion

Kyle planted his ass at Chat and Grumble with a few other former SM posters.  I guess it is ok for him to discuss it over there.

We understand your opinion and how this might frustrate you and this is why I say skip the posts.  We cannot be forced not to discuss a subject just because someone doesn't agree with it.  There are other people who think otherwise.

Just how many boards has Kyle been on spouting his garbage?


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #793 1/13/09
Post by: Tamikosmom on January 18, 2009, 09:08:35 PM
I can accept that Kyle does not feel the need to defend himself here.  But he needs to be man enough to defend himself to Beth Holloway.  He spouted out those comments on an internet website (which is NO guarantee of being secure) that he wanted the information put together so Beth would know what happened.  He couldn't put the words together by himself yet he could do it on a forum with total strangers.  Man up and own up to what happened on that ship is all anyone is asking.  The old saying:  If it walks like a duck, quakes like a duck, ....................   (sorry Janet, no offense to your duck)

Ducky waddles like a duck.  Ducky quacks like a duck.  However ... Ducky is a drake.  He and I are thisclose.

 ::MonkeyCool::

Janet


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #793 1/13/09
Post by: texasmom on January 18, 2009, 09:08:56 PM
bastibro or Johan555,

Can you back up your negative posts toward Kermit with something that is worthy of thinking about?    ::MonkeyRoll::

Yes! I think its time for her to stop bashing Kyle the whole time.
Kyle has chose to not defend himself here at SM and thats his right.
Everything here seems to be about the Kyle and the Persistence issue, thats what irritates me.
I`m convinced this will lead to . . nothing!
I`m sorry, that`s my opinion

Tell me what is worthy of thinking about in that post Bastibro?What do you want to talk about?I'm still patiently waiting.

Maybe i'll have to wait for another day.I just hope Johan and Bastibro aren't part of the Hidey-hole crowd.Now that would be disappointing! ::MonkeyNoNo::

I don't know about both but buckle up and hang on for some disappointment...all I'm going to say about that!   ::MonkeyWink::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #793 1/13/09
Post by: Keepthefaith on January 18, 2009, 09:09:33 PM
bastibro or Johan555,

Can you back up your negative posts toward Kermit with something that is worthy of thinking about?    ::MonkeyRoll::

Yes! I think its time for her to stop bashing Kyle the whole time.
Kyle has chose to not defend himself here at SM and thats his right.
Everything here seems to be about the Kyle and the Persistence issue, thats what irritates me.
I`m convinced this will lead to . . nothing!
I`m sorry, that`s my opinion

Kyle planted his ass at Chat and Grumble with a few other former SM posters.  I guess it is ok for him to discuss it over there.

We understand your opinion and how this might frustrate you and this is why I say skip the posts.  We cannot be forced not to discuss a subject just because someone doesn't agree with it.  There are other people who think otherwise.

I have a feeling Kyle goes where there's the least resistance. ::MonkeyCool::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #793 1/13/09
Post by: 2NJSons_Mom on January 18, 2009, 09:11:08 PM
bastibro or Johan555,

Can you back up your negative posts toward Kermit with something that is worthy of thinking about?    ::MonkeyRoll::

Yes! I think its time for her to stop bashing Kyle the whole time.
Kyle has chose to not defend himself here at SM and thats his right.
Everything here seems to be about the Kyle and the Persistence issue, thats what irritates me.
I`m convinced this will lead to . . nothing!
I`m sorry, that`s my opinion

Kyle planted his ass at Chat and Grumble with a few other former SM posters.  I guess it is ok for him to discuss it over there.

We understand your opinion and how this might frustrate you and this is why I say skip the posts.  We cannot be forced not to discuss a subject just because someone doesn't agree with it.  There are other people who think otherwise.

I have a feeling Kyle goes where there's the least resistance. ::MonkeyCool::

 ::MonkeyHaHa::      My mom had a line about taking the line of least resistance...she used it alot when I was young.  Now, it all comes to light.  Thanks for the memory.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #793 1/13/09
Post by: klaasend on January 18, 2009, 09:11:27 PM
bastibro or Johan555,

Can you back up your negative posts toward Kermit with something that is worthy of thinking about?    ::MonkeyRoll::

Yes! I think its time for her to stop bashing Kyle the whole time.
Kyle has chose to not defend himself here at SM and thats his right.
Everything here seems to be about the Kyle and the Persistence issue, thats what irritates me.
I`m convinced this will lead to . . nothing!
I`m sorry, that`s my opinion

Kyle planted his ass at Chat and Grumble with a few other former SM posters.  I guess it is ok for him to discuss it over there.

We understand your opinion and how this might frustrate you and this is why I say skip the posts.  We cannot be forced not to discuss a subject just because someone doesn't agree with it.  There are other people who think otherwise.

Just how many boards has Kyle been on spouting his garbage?

1.  Blogs for Natalee (members only)
2.  Scaredmonkeys (open for all to read)
3.  Refugeesunleashed (open for all to read)
4.  BringNataleeHome (members only)
5.  Freebirds (members only - invite only)
6.  ChatnGrumble (members only - invite only)

And that's just the ones I am 100% positive of.  ::MonkeyCool::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #793 1/13/09
Post by: Tamikosmom on January 18, 2009, 09:14:04 PM
bastibro or Johan555,

Can you back up your negative posts toward Kermit with something that is worthy of thinking about?    ::MonkeyRoll::

Yes! I think its time for her to stop bashing Kyle the whole time.
Kyle has chose to not defend himself here at SM and thats his right.
Everything here seems to be about the Kyle and the Persistence issue, thats what irritates me.
I`m convinced this will lead to . . nothing!
I`m sorry, that`s my opinion

Kyle planted his ass at Chat and Grumble with a few other former SM posters.  I guess it is ok for him to discuss it over there.

We understand your opinion and how this might frustrate you and this is why I say skip the posts.  We cannot be forced not to discuss a subject just because someone doesn't agree with it.  There are other people who think otherwise.

Just how many boards has Kyle been on spouting his garbage?

1.  Blogs for Natalee (members only)
2.  Scaredmonkeys (open for all to read)
3.  Refugeesunleashed (open for all to read)
4.  BringNataleeHome (members only)
5.  Freebirds (members only - invite only)
6.  ChatnGrumble (members only - invite only)

And that's just the ones I am 100% positive of.  ::MonkeyCool::

 ::MonkeyShocked::

The Beth Hater Club!!!!

Kyle ....  ::MonkeyWaa::

Janet


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #793 1/13/09
Post by: klaasend on January 18, 2009, 09:16:02 PM
Janet - BringNataleeHome not much better


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #793 1/13/09
Post by: texasmom on January 18, 2009, 09:19:55 PM
bastibro or Johan555,

Can you back up your negative posts toward Kermit with something that is worthy of thinking about?    ::MonkeyRoll::

Yes! I think its time for her to stop bashing Kyle the whole time.
Kyle has chose to not defend himself here at SM and thats his right.
Everything here seems to be about the Kyle and the Persistence issue, thats what irritates me.
I`m convinced this will lead to . . nothing!
I`m sorry, that`s my opinion

Kyle planted his ass at Chat and Grumble with a few other former SM posters. I guess it is ok for him to discuss it over there.
We understand your opinion and how this might frustrate you and this is why I say skip the posts.  We cannot be forced not to discuss a subject just because someone doesn't agree with it.  There are other people who think otherwise.

“Well, isn't that special?”

(http://i21.photobucket.com/albums/b258/texasmom55/Greetings/churchlady.jpg)

 ::MonkeyHaHa::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #793 1/13/09
Post by: Anna on January 18, 2009, 09:20:03 PM
O/T  This is a way cool tool for describing 'subjects' looks. Like your very own Perp tool, lol.

http://flashface.ctapt.de/

Wow!  Way cool!



Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #793 1/13/09
Post by: KYcat on January 18, 2009, 09:21:12 PM
bastibro or Johan555,

Can you back up your negative posts toward Kermit with something that is worthy of thinking about?    ::MonkeyRoll::

Yes! I think its time for her to stop bashing Kyle the whole time.
Kyle has chose to not defend himself here at SM and thats his right.
Everything here seems to be about the Kyle and the Persistence issue, thats what irritates me.
I`m convinced this will lead to . . nothing!
I`m sorry, that`s my opinion

Tell me what is worthy of thinking about in that post Bastibro?What do you want to talk about?I'm still patiently waiting.

Maybe i'll have to wait for another day.I just hope Johan and Bastibro aren't part of the Hidey-hole crowd.Now that would be disappointing! ::MonkeyNoNo::

I don't know about both but buckle up and hang on for some disappointment...all I'm going to say about that!   ::MonkeyWink::

I leave the cage for five minutes and look what happens...... TXMom I could not find the post regarding the Mansur wedding so I will have to retract what I said about Hotshot saying "no way" did John attend a Mansur wedding.  I know it's here somewhere.... will continue to look. 


Anyway, know what you are talking about and yes, am disappointed, Johann is part of C&G.

 ::MonkeyWaa::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #793 1/13/09
Post by: Tamikosmom on January 18, 2009, 09:21:15 PM
Janet - BringNataleeHome not much better

Klaas ... was this the site where Robin Holloway posts/posted?

Janet


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #793 1/13/09
Post by: klaasend on January 18, 2009, 09:22:20 PM
Janet - BringNataleeHome not much better

Klaas ... was this the site where Robin Holloway posts/posted?

Janet

Yes, side by side with MIP6 and Reality.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #793 1/13/09
Post by: Tamikosmom on January 18, 2009, 09:22:46 PM
bastibro or Johan555,

Can you back up your negative posts toward Kermit with something that is worthy of thinking about?    ::MonkeyRoll::

Yes! I think its time for her to stop bashing Kyle the whole time.
Kyle has chose to not defend himself here at SM and thats his right.
Everything here seems to be about the Kyle and the Persistence issue, thats what irritates me.
I`m convinced this will lead to . . nothing!
I`m sorry, that`s my opinion

Kyle planted his ass at Chat and Grumble with a few other former SM posters. I guess it is ok for him to discuss it over there.
We understand your opinion and how this might frustrate you and this is why I say skip the posts.  We cannot be forced not to discuss a subject just because someone doesn't agree with it.  There are other people who think otherwise.

“Well, isn't that special?”

(http://i21.photobucket.com/albums/b258/texasmom55/Greetings/churchlady.jpg)

 ::MonkeyHaHa::

texasmom ... you are a hoot!

Janet


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #793 1/13/09
Post by: Tamikosmom on January 18, 2009, 09:23:30 PM
Janet - BringNataleeHome not much better

Klaas ... was this the site where Robin Holloway posts/posted?

Janet

Yes, side by side with MIP6 and Reality.

 ::MonkeyNoNo::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #793 1/13/09
Post by: WhiskeyGirl on January 18, 2009, 09:24:19 PM
At least we haven't yet been told that those were donkey bones in the trap!


 ::MonkeyHaHa::



No.It's an extrodinarily big Hermit crab bone! ::MonkeyLaugh::

Yes, along with the often seen sneaker-fish and the mysterious phone-coral.


Good Afternoon, everyone.

I consider that Aruba may be an island surrounded by a vast watery graveyard.  

Think of all the bones that was ashore and end up in the back of a police cruiser? 

Think of all the times they fed the sharks around the island?  Who knows what was in that shark kibble?

Think of all the illegal aliens and tourists that disappear in the rough ocean water?

Think of all the runaways and human trafficing?  What happens to those people?

Who knows what gets dumped by the cruise ships?  Merchant ships?  Military ships?

Is it any wonder that 'things' just wash ashore?  Mystery items?  Where are they warehoused?  Where are they taken before and after identification?  Who in Aruba keeps track of all these items?

Remember the story of the prisioners buried at the sand dunes?  What did they do with those remains before they opened the park to the public?

imho


There's possiblilties in all that.The difference is.They went down to search for a trap/cage(really mapping the floor),as well as other targets(mapping the floor).They found a trap/cage(while mapping the ocean floor).They found in Kyle's word's.Human remains(while mapping the ocean floor).ALE comes in and swoops the contents up!Guess we'll never know who was really in that cage.That's the problem with the whole Persistence search!It wasn't about Natalee.JMOO

KEEPTHEFAITH

I still have faith that the Persistence search was for Natalee.  I think there is a possibility that she is in one of the other targets.   What commercial purpose would there be in looking at any specific target?  If they were mapping the floor, that was done.

How many cages/traps may still be down there?  Perhaps that was a common method of body disposal, second to maybe to caves, fire, self-mutilation, and hanging?

It seems unlikely to me that they would find Natalee with the first target.  If there intention was just to map, why worry about cage dimensions or zeroing in on fewer targets?  Why let the media or Tim on the boat at all?

It seems like the 'remains' in the first target/cage/trap may be an effort by some to prevent further searches for the truth that remain on the ocean floor around Aruba.

I've never seen anything that describes what the other targets look like.  The result of the remains, irregardless of to whom they may belong, is that the ocean search appears to be over for Natalee.  I suspect she is still out there.

PJ2K still have the opportunity to tell the truth, as do others on Aruba, including those in government, the prosecutors office, and the judiciary, all past and present involved in this case.

just my humble opinions

1.It seems you think the cage is a diversion?Correct?
2.You don't trust Kyle's professional opinion?
2.Seems to me that there won't be any other searches in the ocean for Natalee.Not from the Persistence anyway!

I believe there are many sides to any coin...

I also recall reading an email Kermit posted from Kyle, indicating that some of Kyles posts may have been taken out of context.  Since I was not involved in the secret forum, I don't know what the actual flow of conversation was...

What is an 'opinion'?  Educated guess?  Uneducated guess?  Best guess?  100% accurate 100% of the time?

jmho


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #793 1/13/09
Post by: Keepthefaith on January 18, 2009, 09:24:28 PM
bastibro or Johan555,

Can you back up your negative posts toward Kermit with something that is worthy of thinking about?    ::MonkeyRoll::

Yes! I think its time for her to stop bashing Kyle the whole time.
Kyle has chose to not defend himself here at SM and thats his right.
Everything here seems to be about the Kyle and the Persistence issue, thats what irritates me.
I`m convinced this will lead to . . nothing!
I`m sorry, that`s my opinion

Tell me what is worthy of thinking about in that post Bastibro?What do you want to talk about?I'm still patiently waiting.

Maybe i'll have to wait for another day.I just hope Johan and Bastibro aren't part of the Hidey-hole crowd.Now that would be disappointing! ::MonkeyNoNo::

I don't know about both but buckle up and hang on for some disappointment...all I'm going to say about that!   ::MonkeyWink::

I leave the cage for five minutes and look what happens...... TXMom I could not find the post regarding the Mansur wedding so I will have to retract what I said about Hotshot saying "no way" did John attend a Mansur wedding.  I know it's here somewhere.... will continue to look. 


Anyway, know what you are talking about and yes, am disappointed, Johann is part of C&G.

 ::MonkeyWaa::


Well now.Isn't that interesting. ::MonkeyCool::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #793 1/13/09
Post by: Keepthefaith on January 18, 2009, 09:26:32 PM
At least we haven't yet been told that those were donkey bones in the trap!


 ::MonkeyHaHa::



No.It's an extrodinarily big Hermit crab bone! ::MonkeyLaugh::

Yes, along with the often seen sneaker-fish and the mysterious phone-coral.


Good Afternoon, everyone.

I consider that Aruba may be an island surrounded by a vast watery graveyard.  

Think of all the bones that was ashore and end up in the back of a police cruiser? 

Think of all the times they fed the sharks around the island?  Who knows what was in that shark kibble?

Think of all the illegal aliens and tourists that disappear in the rough ocean water?

Think of all the runaways and human trafficing?  What happens to those people?

Who knows what gets dumped by the cruise ships?  Merchant ships?  Military ships?

Is it any wonder that 'things' just wash ashore?  Mystery items?  Where are they warehoused?  Where are they taken before and after identification?  Who in Aruba keeps track of all these items?

Remember the story of the prisioners buried at the sand dunes?  What did they do with those remains before they opened the park to the public?

imho


There's possiblilties in all that.The difference is.They went down to search for a trap/cage(really mapping the floor),as well as other targets(mapping the floor).They found a trap/cage(while mapping the ocean floor).They found in Kyle's word's.Human remains(while mapping the ocean floor).ALE comes in and swoops the contents up!Guess we'll never know who was really in that cage.That's the problem with the whole Persistence search!It wasn't about Natalee.JMOO

KEEPTHEFAITH

I still have faith that the Persistence search was for Natalee.  I think there is a possibility that she is in one of the other targets.   What commercial purpose would there be in looking at any specific target?  If they were mapping the floor, that was done.

How many cages/traps may still be down there?  Perhaps that was a common method of body disposal, second to maybe to caves, fire, self-mutilation, and hanging?

It seems unlikely to me that they would find Natalee with the first target.  If there intention was just to map, why worry about cage dimensions or zeroing in on fewer targets?  Why let the media or Tim on the boat at all?

It seems like the 'remains' in the first target/cage/trap may be an effort by some to prevent further searches for the truth that remain on the ocean floor around Aruba.

I've never seen anything that describes what the other targets look like.  The result of the remains, irregardless of to whom they may belong, is that the ocean search appears to be over for Natalee.  I suspect she is still out there.

PJ2K still have the opportunity to tell the truth, as do others on Aruba, including those in government, the prosecutors office, and the judiciary, all past and present involved in this case.

just my humble opinions

1.It seems you think the cage is a diversion?Correct?
2.You don't trust Kyle's professional opinion?
2.Seems to me that there won't be any other searches in the ocean for Natalee.Not from the Persistence anyway!

I believe there are many sides to any coin...

I also recall reading an email Kermit posted from Kyle, indicating that some of Kyles posts may have been taken out of context.  Since I was not involved in the secret forum, I don't know what the actual flow of conversation was...

What is an 'opinion'?  Educated guess?  Uneducated guess?  Best guess?  100% accurate 100% of the time?

jmho

If i;m readin this right.You believe Kermit has taken some of Kyle's words out of context?Correct me if i'm wrong.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #793 1/13/09
Post by: truthseeker2 on January 18, 2009, 09:27:12 PM
WhiskeyGirl,

All I know abou opinions is what we have always said around my little part of the world:

"Opinions are like noses....everybody has one."


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #793 1/13/09
Post by: KYcat on January 18, 2009, 09:27:17 PM
I would like to talk about oil....... does that count?

I would also like to talk about THE "tennis shoe/s" 

THE "tennis shoe/s" have bothered me for a long time.  While I was looking for the "Mansur wedding" I came across some old posts regarding the shoe.

I will have to bring over the relevant posts....... but now I have to go put clean sheets on our bed because my hubby is clearing his throat and giving me the evil eye.  Can't he see I am busy! 

Be back in 10

 ::MonkeyCool::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #793 1/13/09
Post by: texasmom on January 18, 2009, 09:28:21 PM
bastibro or Johan555,

Can you back up your negative posts toward Kermit with something that is worthy of thinking about?    ::MonkeyRoll::

Yes! I think its time for her to stop bashing Kyle the whole time.
Kyle has chose to not defend himself here at SM and thats his right.
Everything here seems to be about the Kyle and the Persistence issue, thats what irritates me.
I`m convinced this will lead to . . nothing!
I`m sorry, that`s my opinion

Tell me what is worthy of thinking about in that post Bastibro?What do you want to talk about?I'm still patiently waiting.

Maybe i'll have to wait for another day.I just hope Johan and Bastibro aren't part of the Hidey-hole crowd.Now that would be disappointing! ::MonkeyNoNo::

I don't know about both but buckle up and hang on for some disappointment...all I'm going to say about that!   ::MonkeyWink::

I leave the cage for five minutes and look what happens...... TXMom I could not find the post regarding the Mansur wedding so I will have to retract what I said about Hotshot saying "no way" did John attend a Mansur wedding.  I know it's here somewhere.... will continue to look. 


Anyway, know what you are talking about and yes, am disappointed, Johann is part of C&G.

 ::MonkeyWaa::


Don't worry about finding that KYcat, not worth the trouble.  


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #793 1/13/09
Post by: 2NJSons_Mom on January 18, 2009, 09:31:03 PM
WhiskeyGirl,

All I know abou opinions is what we have always said around my little part of the world:

"Opinions are like noses....everybody has one."

And that's the nice way to say it, Truthseeker2.   ::MonkeyWink::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #793 1/13/09
Post by: KYcat on January 18, 2009, 09:31:24 PM
WhiskeyGirl,

All I know abou opinions is what we have always said around my little part of the world:

"Opinions are like noses....everybody has one."

That's not what they say where I am from......LOL

"Opinions are like a$$holes..........everybody has one."

 ::MonkeyHaHa::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #793 1/13/09
Post by: Tamikosmom on January 18, 2009, 09:31:40 PM

<snipped>

I believe there are many sides to any coin...

<snipped>



Whiskeygirl ... there are only two sides to a coin.  Either you believe Kyle Kingman's own words or ... you believe Kyle Kingman is a liar.

Which is it?

Respectfully, Janet


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #793 1/13/09
Post by: Blue Moon on January 18, 2009, 09:31:54 PM
I found the discussion on the sale of the Valero refinery--it was in November 2007 (just before the ship sailed to Aruba). That is interesting to me:

http://scaredmonkeys.net/index.php?topic=2305.msg297979#msg297979

    
Re: Natalee Case Discussion #688 11/2 -
« Reply #883 on: November 12, 2007, 11:39:36 AM »
   
Quote from: Anna on November 12, 2007, 11:36:47 AM
Quote from: ldstlou on November 12, 2007, 11:19:56 AM
Quote from: Anna on November 12, 2007, 10:27:25 AM
Quote from: ldstlou on November 12, 2007, 10:07:45 AM
Quote from: Anna on November 12, 2007, 09:53:58 AM
I wonder if we wrote to Valero in El Paso, TX, state where Tim Miller is very respected and asked them to close the refinery and let it sit idle and just take the tax write off until they can sell it if that would have any effect on them.

That might apply as much pressure as the boycott.  They are obviously wanting to get rid of it for a reason and I suspect it is not profitable or they would be keeping it.  47% pay hike is pretty large.

.

I think the problem is Oduber? says aruba is not getting any taxes on the earnings for 10 years, am I remembering that correctly I bet they would get a bundle in taxes over the sale of the refinery though!! I think the government is once again looking for a way to rape the island to put $$ in their pockets.
What bother me is, if the government is not making money via taxes on the refinery...the only people who would be hurt by shutting it down would be those who work there for a living...I can't see the sense or the justice in that. I wonder how many people they employ? I bet the MEP would like the sale of the refinery, so they can get their piece!!


I don't think they would get much from the sale of the refinery since it belongs to Valero.  They did give tax exemptions for them to come to Aruba but those are going to run out soon.  I think 2011 is the date given.

Valero will sell it for sure by then but sitting idle would effect the economy the same as a boycott.  I much prefer to see that investment in U.S. refineries giving jobs to Americans from American investment than giving jobs to Arubans so many of whom dislike Americans so much in the first place.

I would like to see American dollars providing jobs for Americans first rather than Arubans who make our citizens disappear and don't give a flip about it.

In fact, I'd like to see all American investment pulled out of there before Hugo takes over and nationalizes it if that's what he has in mind.

Or ODUBER nationalizes it.  I would not want to be holding anything to do with oil anywhere in that region as Chavez has already set the example just taking oil related industry for himself and his corrupt government.

JMO

.

oops..I got booted!! lol

I guess I have not researched the refinery at all. So it is American owned? I had no idea. So why does aruba and oduber care whether it is making a profit or not??!! If it is exempt from taxes until 2011 and aruba doesn't get a piece of the profits, why the big deal about profits being down? Something is up!! Oduber would not stick his big nose into it unless he was looking for financial gains. I wonder if they would get a piece of the capital gains if it is sold? they must get something out of a sale or they wouldn't be complaining about the loss of profits.


I don't know but suspect that Valero will want to unload that place long before the tax exempt status runs out.  This is commonly done to lure new businesses to come to a place.  Alabama gave tax exemption to a car manufacturing plant so it would locate here, creating jobs, etc. on which the government does receive taxes so I suspect it is in that vein that the tax revenues are down the income tax and money from spending their paychecks that he may mean.  They also may get a small tax per gallon or barrel of oil processed there.

I'd like to see all those Americans who have invested money in Aruba bring that money home and rebuild our own Gulf Coast from Katrina.

Just as an idea of the grandiose mindset of some Arubans, one posted once on the Front Page that Aruba processed some huge percentage of oil for the U.S.  They have that exactly backward.  A huge amount of the oil the process goes to the U.S. and it is evidently lost on them what a drop in the bucket Aruba refines as Katrina wiped out 35 refineries.  They are but one.  But note how they exaggerate their own importance in the big picture.  We would not even notice if that refinery were open or closed in our total oil supply.  They certainly would if we refused to buy oil refined there, being is major customer.

But I seriously doubt the average Aruban realizes that and goes about thinking they are processing most of our oil and are totally vital to our survival instead of the other way around.  Perhaps this explains some of their cockiness and rudeness to Americans.

Bring all American investment dollars home and rebuild the resort areas in our own Gulf Coast and provide jobs for Americans first.

What may have been profitable in the past may not be so in the future given Aruban fondness for Chavez and other Latin American despots.  Let them buy it and try to run it without power, strikes and all the headaches.  It is one of Valero's least desirable locations which surely means low profit, high cost of operation and many oil companies have had their operations seized by governments and nationalized into government ownership.  Oduber acts like a dictator and might try the same sort of thing.

American dollars should be investing in America not corrupt little islands that spit in our faces.

JMO
.



Looks like they are already bailing!!!!

I found this article;

Nov 07, 2007

Valero Puts Aruba Refinery Up for Grabs; Q3 Net Income Falls 21%


Joanna Franco
Editor

San Antonio-based Valero Energy yesterday announced that its Aruba refinery is up for possible sale, while net income for the third quarter of 2007 tumbled 21% compared to the third quarter of 2006.


Net income for the third quarter of 2007, which ended Sept. 30, was $1.3 billion, compared to 2006’s third quarter net income of $1.6 billion. However, net income for the first nine months of 2007 was $4.7 billion, a 7% increase from $4.3 billion during the same period a year ago.


Valero executives blamed an increase in feedstock costs and the seasonal drop in gasoline as partly contributing to the reduced margins.


To read the rest of this article from the newsletter World Refining & Fuels Today, or to purchase a single article or request a trial subscription, please contact Karen Wilson at kwilson@hartenergy.com or 1-703-891-4803.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #793 1/13/09
Post by: texasmom on January 18, 2009, 09:33:17 PM
WhiskeyGirl,

All I know abou opinions is what we have always said around my little part of the world:

"Opinions are like noses....everybody has one."

And that's the nice way to say it, Truthseeker2.   ::MonkeyWink::

I thought so too!   ::MonkeyWink::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #793 1/13/09
Post by: Blue Moon on January 18, 2009, 09:33:41 PM
bastibro or Johan555,

Can you back up your negative posts toward Kermit with something that is worthy of thinking about?    ::MonkeyRoll::

Yes! I think its time for her to stop bashing Kyle the whole time.
Kyle has chose to not defend himself here at SM and thats his right.
Everything here seems to be about the Kyle and the Persistence issue, thats what irritates me.
I`m convinced this will lead to . . nothing!
I`m sorry, that`s my opinion

Kyle planted his ass at Chat and Grumble with a few other former SM posters.  I guess it is ok for him to discuss it over there.

We understand your opinion and how this might frustrate you and this is why I say skip the posts.  We cannot be forced not to discuss a subject just because someone doesn't agree with it.  There are other people who think otherwise.

Just how many boards has Kyle been on spouting his garbage?

1.  Blogs for Natalee (members only)
2.  Scaredmonkeys (open for all to read)
3.  Refugeesunleashed (open for all to read)
4.  BringNataleeHome (members only)
5.  Freebirds (members only - invite only)
6.  ChatnGrumble (members only - invite only)

And that's just the ones I am 100% positive of.  ::MonkeyCool::

Sounds like Kyle was working for AHATA.  Bet he was told to keep the blogs in line.  If so he failed.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #793 1/13/09
Post by: hotping on January 18, 2009, 09:35:22 PM
WhiskeyGirl,

All I know abou opinions is what we have always said around my little part of the world:

"Opinions are like noses....everybody has one."

That's not what they say where I am from......LOL

"Opinions are like a$$holes..........everybody has one."

 ::MonkeyHaHa::
KYCat....That's the way I've always heard it in My neck of the woods.... ::MonkeyWink::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #793 1/13/09
Post by: texasmom on January 18, 2009, 09:38:44 PM
bastibro or Johan555,

Can you back up your negative posts toward Kermit with something that is worthy of thinking about?    ::MonkeyRoll::

Yes! I think its time for her to stop bashing Kyle the whole time.
Kyle has chose to not defend himself here at SM and thats his right.
Everything here seems to be about the Kyle and the Persistence issue, thats what irritates me.
I`m convinced this will lead to . . nothing!
I`m sorry, that`s my opinion

Kyle planted his ass at Chat and Grumble with a few other former SM posters.  I guess it is ok for him to discuss it over there.

We understand your opinion and how this might frustrate you and this is why I say skip the posts.  We cannot be forced not to discuss a subject just because someone doesn't agree with it.  There are other people who think otherwise.

Just how many boards has Kyle been on spouting his garbage?

1.  Blogs for Natalee (members only)
2.  Scaredmonkeys (open for all to read)
3.  Refugeesunleashed (open for all to read)
4.  BringNataleeHome (members only)
5.  Freebirds (members only - invite only)
6.  ChatnGrumble (members only - invite only)

And that's just the ones I am 100% positive of.  ::MonkeyCool::

Sounds like Kyle was working for AHATA.  Bet he was told to keep the blogs in line.  If so he failed.

Nothing would really surprise me at this point.  And it has been stated that on the fundraising effort...AHATA was working on raising a large sum for the search.  Search for what is the question I have now?  Don't think it was about Natalee. 

 ::MonkeyNoNo:: 


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #793 1/13/09
Post by: 2NJSons_Mom on January 18, 2009, 09:38:56 PM
WhiskeyGirl,

All I know abou opinions is what we have always said around my little part of the world:

"Opinions are like noses....everybody has one."

That's not what they say where I am from......LOL

"Opinions are like a$$holes..........everybody has one."

 ::MonkeyHaHa::
KYCat....That's the way I've always heard it in My neck of the woods.... ::MonkeyWink::

Here, too, but that's why I told Truthseeker2 it's the nice way to say it....and there is always a nicer way to say something. 


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #793 1/13/09
Post by: truthseeker2 on January 18, 2009, 09:39:27 PM
WhiskeyGirl,

All I know abou opinions is what we have always said around my little part of the world:

"Opinions are like noses....everybody has one."

That's not what they say where I am from......LOL

"Opinions are like a$$holes..........everybody has one."

 ::MonkeyHaHa::

LOL.  I was trying to keep it 'family oriented'.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #793 1/13/09
Post by: texasmom on January 18, 2009, 09:41:19 PM
WhiskeyGirl,

All I know abou opinions is what we have always said around my little part of the world:

"Opinions are like noses....everybody has one."

That's not what they say where I am from......LOL

"Opinions are like a$$holes..........everybody has one."

 ::MonkeyHaHa::

Yep, I've heard that one too...   ::MonkeyWink::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #793 1/13/09
Post by: Anna on January 18, 2009, 09:44:26 PM
I found the discussion on the sale of the Valero refinery--it was in November 2007 (just before the ship sailed to Aruba). That is interesting to me:

http://scaredmonkeys.net/index.php?topic=2305.msg297979#msg297979

    
Re: Natalee Case Discussion #688 11/2 -
« Reply #883 on: November 12, 2007, 11:39:36 AM »
   
Quote from: Anna on November 12, 2007, 11:36:47 AM
Quote from: ldstlou on November 12, 2007, 11:19:56 AM
Quote from: Anna on November 12, 2007, 10:27:25 AM
Quote from: ldstlou on November 12, 2007, 10:07:45 AM
Quote from: Anna on November 12, 2007, 09:53:58 AM
I wonder if we wrote to Valero in El Paso, TX, state where Tim Miller is very respected and asked them to close the refinery and let it sit idle and just take the tax write off until they can sell it if that would have any effect on them.

That might apply as much pressure as the boycott.  They are obviously wanting to get rid of it for a reason and I suspect it is not profitable or they would be keeping it.  47% pay hike is pretty large.

.

I think the problem is Oduber? says aruba is not getting any taxes on the earnings for 10 years, am I remembering that correctly I bet they would get a bundle in taxes over the sale of the refinery though!! I think the government is once again looking for a way to rape the island to put $$ in their pockets.
What bother me is, if the government is not making money via taxes on the refinery...the only people who would be hurt by shutting it down would be those who work there for a living...I can't see the sense or the justice in that. I wonder how many people they employ? I bet the MEP would like the sale of the refinery, so they can get their piece!!


I don't think they would get much from the sale of the refinery since it belongs to Valero.  They did give tax exemptions for them to come to Aruba but those are going to run out soon.  I think 2011 is the date given.

Valero will sell it for sure by then but sitting idle would effect the economy the same as a boycott.  I much prefer to see that investment in U.S. refineries giving jobs to Americans from American investment than giving jobs to Arubans so many of whom dislike Americans so much in the first place.

I would like to see American dollars providing jobs for Americans first rather than Arubans who make our citizens disappear and don't give a flip about it.

In fact, I'd like to see all American investment pulled out of there before Hugo takes over and nationalizes it if that's what he has in mind.

Or ODUBER nationalizes it.  I would not want to be holding anything to do with oil anywhere in that region as Chavez has already set the example just taking oil related industry for himself and his corrupt government.

JMO

.

oops..I got booted!! lol

I guess I have not researched the refinery at all. So it is American owned? I had no idea. So why does aruba and oduber care whether it is making a profit or not??!! If it is exempt from taxes until 2011 and aruba doesn't get a piece of the profits, why the big deal about profits being down? Something is up!! Oduber would not stick his big nose into it unless he was looking for financial gains. I wonder if they would get a piece of the capital gains if it is sold? they must get something out of a sale or they wouldn't be complaining about the loss of profits.


I don't know but suspect that Valero will want to unload that place long before the tax exempt status runs out.  This is commonly done to lure new businesses to come to a place.  Alabama gave tax exemption to a car manufacturing plant so it would locate here, creating jobs, etc. on which the government does receive taxes so I suspect it is in that vein that the tax revenues are down the income tax and money from spending their paychecks that he may mean.  They also may get a small tax per gallon or barrel of oil processed there.

I'd like to see all those Americans who have invested money in Aruba bring that money home and rebuild our own Gulf Coast from Katrina.

Just as an idea of the grandiose mindset of some Arubans, one posted once on the Front Page that Aruba processed some huge percentage of oil for the U.S.  They have that exactly backward.  A huge amount of the oil the process goes to the U.S. and it is evidently lost on them what a drop in the bucket Aruba refines as Katrina wiped out 35 refineries.  They are but one.  But note how they exaggerate their own importance in the big picture.  We would not even notice if that refinery were open or closed in our total oil supply.  They certainly would if we refused to buy oil refined there, being is major customer.

But I seriously doubt the average Aruban realizes that and goes about thinking they are processing most of our oil and are totally vital to our survival instead of the other way around.  Perhaps this explains some of their cockiness and rudeness to Americans.

Bring all American investment dollars home and rebuild the resort areas in our own Gulf Coast and provide jobs for Americans first.

What may have been profitable in the past may not be so in the future given Aruban fondness for Chavez and other Latin American despots.  Let them buy it and try to run it without power, strikes and all the headaches.  It is one of Valero's least desirable locations which surely means low profit, high cost of operation and many oil companies have had their operations seized by governments and nationalized into government ownership.  Oduber acts like a dictator and might try the same sort of thing.

American dollars should be investing in America not corrupt little islands that spit in our faces.

JMO
.



Looks like they are already bailing!!!!

I found this article;

Nov 07, 2007

Valero Puts Aruba Refinery Up for Grabs; Q3 Net Income Falls 21%


Joanna Franco
Editor

San Antonio-based Valero Energy yesterday announced that its Aruba refinery is up for possible sale, while net income for the third quarter of 2007 tumbled 21% compared to the third quarter of 2006.


Net income for the third quarter of 2007, which ended Sept. 30, was $1.3 billion, compared to 2006’s third quarter net income of $1.6 billion. However, net income for the first nine months of 2007 was $4.7 billion, a 7% increase from $4.3 billion during the same period a year ago.


Valero executives blamed an increase in feedstock costs and the seasonal drop in gasoline as partly contributing to the reduced margins.


To read the rest of this article from the newsletter World Refining & Fuels Today, or to purchase a single article or request a trial subscription, please contact Karen Wilson at kwilson@hartenergy.com or 1-703-891-4803.



I agree completely with this poster Anna.  She seems very wise.   ::MonkeyHaHa::

Divest U.S.  $ in places like Aruba now more than ever.

Bring all U.S. $ home where it is needed especially at this time.


But all of this oil is very interesting to say the least.  I believe a government company from Brazil ended up buying it, didn't they?

Again, S. American connection.


.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #793 1/13/09
Post by: hotping on January 18, 2009, 09:45:50 PM
WhiskeyGirl,

All I know abou opinions is what we have always said around my little part of the world:

"Opinions are like noses....everybody has one."

That's not what they say where I am from......LOL

"Opinions are like a$$holes..........everybody has one."

 ::MonkeyHaHa::

LOL.  I was trying to keep it 'family oriented'.
Truthseeker2...You did Good!  ::MonkeyWink:: ::MonkeyHaHa::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #793 1/13/09
Post by: truthseeker2 on January 18, 2009, 09:46:57 PM
Thanks, hotping.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #793 1/13/09
Post by: Blue Moon on January 18, 2009, 09:47:32 PM
I agree that Anna is one smart Monkey.  ::MonkeyHaHa::

I find it interesting that the sale/problems were around the same time as the ship making it's trip.  Also the South American connection.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #793 1/13/09
Post by: Tamikosmom on January 18, 2009, 09:47:35 PM

I believe there are many sides to any coin...

I also recall reading an email Kermit posted from Kyle, indicating that some of Kyles posts may have been taken out of context.  Since I was not involved in the secret forum, I don't know what the actual flow of conversation was...

What is an 'opinion'?  Educated guess?  Uneducated guess?  Best guess?  100% accurate 100% of the time?

jmho


If i;m readin this right.You believe Kermit has taken some of Kyle's words out of context?Correct me if i'm wrong.

Hey ... th Natalee's Freebirds' would not be in contact with Beth Holloway in regards to Kyle Kingman's own words if those words could not be backed up in a factual way ... backed up through an IP number.

Janet

++++++


klassend
Re: Natalee Case Discussion #787 12/24/08 -
« Reply #411 on: December 30, 2008, 06:53:44 PM »


Sent to me by Natalee's Freebirds:

Please feel free (if you'd like) to post this at your board.
 
During the journey of the Persistence to Aruba, Kyle reached out and emailed with us.  During that time, one of the questions posed to him was regarding protocol if/when Natalee's remains were found.
 
Kyle's response was that he was unsure, but felt that would be settled before the search began.
 
The cautions were given to him about the lack of integrity on the part of Aruba's law enforcement, prosecutor's office, and its judiciary.
 
Contact with Kyle continued throughout the duration of the search by the Persistence.
 
Once back home, Kyle asked us for our help.  He was very concerned about the activities that transpired during their search - specifically surrounding the find of the fishing cage and its contents.  Kyle wanted our help in presenting this information in a factual way, to then be given to Natalee's family. 
 
This was March 18, 2008.  At that time, Kyle assured us he had just recently sent the images from the Dec 30th and Jan 7th dives to the FBI, but had never received a response from them.
 
We later found that to be false.
 
Also at that time, Beth's brother saw the images Kyle had shared with us - but none of the detail he shared later.

We compiled the images Kyle presented us, along with his opinions and the facts surrounding the sequence of events regarding that fishing cage.  Kyle stated he would be getting in touch with Beth Holloway.
 
We later found out that never happened.

At this time, Kyle shared with us the broadcast networks he had approached in February, in an attempt to sell these images to the highest bidder.
 
This didn't concern us greatly at that time - as we were under the impression US law enforcement and Natalee's family had already been made aware of their find.
 
Approximately May 2008 Kyle began dodging questions for details (we had asked for names of Aruban police and divers to be included in our documentation of these events), hedging on moving forward with this, and then he completely disappeared from our board.
 
During that time, we learned Kyle had never contacted Beth, or Dave, or the FBI with this information.
 
We put our original plan into motion - that of presenting this information in a clear and concise manner, and we sent it to Beth Holloway.
 
Beth was disturbed, needed time to digest the information, and wanted to share it with someone she trusts.
 
When Tim Miller was returning to Aruba this past fall, Beth gave us permission to release this information publicly.

At that point, we gave it to John Kelly, Carmen Adams with the FBI, and got it ready for public consumption.
 
The next step was to publish this information at our blog.
 
One of our members felt we were betraying Kyle in doing so, contacted him, and he re-surfaced at our site with threats of litigation against us - stating this was his "intellectual property" and we could not use it.
 
That of course concerned us greatly - as none of us could afford to be sued.
 
He also stated at that time, Luis Shaefer had just recently sold the rights of the video of these images to a broadcast company for the purposes of a documentary.
 
We contacted legal counsel and were advised to keep our distance from any Persistence crew member, in the face of potential obstruction/accessory charges.
 
At this point, one of our members decided to brace for the possibility of civil litigation, resigned from our membership to protect it from same, and posted what he knows to be factual at SM.
 
Kyle did tell us human remains were found in that fish cage.
 
Kyle did tell us about John Silvetti's intent to open an office on the island of Aruba, to enable him ease in conducting business in South America, and Aruba.
 
Kyle also told us of John's absolute refusal to give that fish cage and its contents any credence - before even it was inspected on Jan 7th.
 
Kyle told us in no uncertain terms that Tim Miller and Dateline were abruptly removed from the Persistence on Dec 30, resulting in only Persistence crew being aboard between that date and the Jan 7 dive of the Arubans.
 
Nothing that was posted at SM by kermit was incorrect, out of context, or in any way false.
 
Regards,
 
Former Natalee's Freebirds Administrator

Natalee and her family deserve justice - and we will not let up until they have it!

http://scaredmonkeys.net/index.php?topic=4269.msg603349#msg603349


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #793 1/13/09
Post by: Anna on January 18, 2009, 09:47:41 PM
Tim Miller was just on Dana but I didn't hear him say anything about Natalee.  Just Caylee investigation.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #793 1/13/09
Post by: hotping on January 18, 2009, 09:47:41 PM
Thanks, hotping.
YW!  ::MonkeyCool::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #793 1/13/09
Post by: SuzieQ on January 18, 2009, 09:48:13 PM
I thought Kyle didn't want the latest pictures out there. What was all the fuss about Kermit bringing them to SM?  Has anyone seen Hotshot's site lately? ::MonkeyConfused::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #793 1/13/09
Post by: Blue Moon on January 18, 2009, 09:51:05 PM
I thought Kyle didn't want the latest pictures out there. What was all the fuss about Kermit bringing them to SM?  Has anyone seen Hotshot's site lately? ::MonkeyConfused::

I haven't seen Hotshots site lately?  Do you have a link?


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #793 1/13/09
Post by: hotping on January 18, 2009, 09:51:38 PM
I thought Kyle didn't want the latest pictures out there. What was all the fuss about Kermit bringing them to SM?  Has anyone seen Hotshot's site lately? ::MonkeyConfused::
Hi SuzieQ...You got a link for Hotshot's site? TIA!


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #793 1/13/09
Post by: SuzieQ on January 18, 2009, 09:52:54 PM
I thought Kyle didn't want the latest pictures out there. What was all the fuss about Kermit bringing them to SM?  Has anyone seen Hotshot's site lately? ::MonkeyConfused::

I haven't seen Hotshots site lately?  Do you have a link?


Sorry

http://arubassilence.bravehost.com/



Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #793 1/13/09
Post by: WhiskeyGirl on January 18, 2009, 09:54:17 PM

<snipped>

I believe there are many sides to any coin...

<snipped>



Whiskeygirl ... there are only two sides to a coin.  Either you believe Kyle Kingman's own words or ... you believe Kyle Kingman is a liar.

Which is it?

Respectfully, Janet

Janet,

Respectfully, there are many possible sides to a coin.  What comes to mind are two broad sides and the side that goes 'around', the diameter.  Sometimes, the diameter has multiple ridges, with many more sides.  Some coins I have seen have a hole in the center.

Sometimes, it's hard to know where the truth has landed, on a broad side, or a side/diameter.  Sometimes, maybe all that is exposed are some ridges.  The broad sides remain hidden.  Maybe all that is visible is the donut hole in the middle.  Must remains to be explored.

I have no way of knowing what the truth is from the many posts by Kermit.  There are many sides of the truth/story/facts that remain hidden to me.

jmho


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #793 1/13/09
Post by: klaasend on January 18, 2009, 09:55:10 PM
I thought Kyle didn't want the latest pictures out there. What was all the fuss about Kermit bringing them to SM?  Has anyone seen Hotshot's site lately? ::MonkeyConfused::

I haven't seen Hotshots site lately?  Do you have a link?


Sorry

http://arubassilence.bravehost.com/



Looks like someone is playing both sides of the coin  ::MonkeyCool::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #793 1/13/09
Post by: Tamikosmom on January 18, 2009, 09:55:28 PM
I thought Kyle didn't want the latest pictures out there. What was all the fuss about Kermit bringing them to SM?  Has anyone seen Hotshot's site lately? ::MonkeyConfused::

Hotshot has a site!!!

 ::MonkeyShocked::

Janet



Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #793 1/13/09
Post by: SuzieQ on January 18, 2009, 09:56:47 PM
I thought Kyle didn't want the latest pictures out there. What was all the fuss about Kermit bringing them to SM?  Has anyone seen Hotshot's site lately? ::MonkeyConfused::

I haven't seen Hotshots site lately?  Do you have a link?


Sorry

http://arubassilence.bravehost.com/



Looks like someone is playing both sides of the coin  ::MonkeyCool::


That's exactly what I thought!


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #793 1/13/09
Post by: Tamikosmom on January 18, 2009, 09:58:06 PM
I thought Kyle didn't want the latest pictures out there. What was all the fuss about Kermit bringing them to SM?  Has anyone seen Hotshot's site lately? ::MonkeyConfused::

I haven't seen Hotshots site lately?  Do you have a link?


Sorry

http://arubassilence.bravehost.com/



Looks like someone is playing both sides of the coin  ::MonkeyCool::

 ::MonkeyHaHa::   ::MonkeyHaHa::   ::MonkeyHaHa::

I can't stop laughing.

 ::MonkeyHaHa::   ::MonkeyHaHa::   ::MonkeyHaHa::

Janet


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #793 1/13/09
Post by: Tamikosmom on January 18, 2009, 10:01:14 PM

<snipped>

I believe there are many sides to any coin...

<snipped>



Whiskeygirl ... there are only two sides to a coin.  Either you believe Kyle Kingman's own words or ... you believe Kyle Kingman is a liar.

Which is it?

Respectfully, Janet

Janet,

Respectfully, there are many possible sides to a coin.  What comes to mind are two broad sides and the side that goes 'around', the diameter.  Sometimes, the diameter has multiple ridges, with many more sides.  Some coins I have seen have a hole in the center.

Sometimes, it's hard to know where the truth has landed, on a broad side, or a side/diameter.  Sometimes, maybe all that is exposed are some ridges.  The broad sides remain hidden.  Maybe all that is visible is the donut hole in the middle.  Must remains to be explored.

I have no way of knowing what the truth is from the many posts by Kermit.  There are many sides of the truth/story/facts that remain hidden to me.

jmho

Whiskeygirl

Kermit's posts are Kyle Kingman's own words.  Either you believe Kyle Kingman or you do not.  I am a believer.

Janet


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #793 1/13/09
Post by: hotping on January 18, 2009, 10:02:22 PM
I thought Kyle didn't want the latest pictures out there. What was all the fuss about Kermit bringing them to SM?  Has anyone seen Hotshot's site lately? ::MonkeyConfused::

I haven't seen Hotshots site lately?  Do you have a link?


Sorry

http://arubassilence.bravehost.com/


Thank You for the Link!  ::MonkeyWink::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #793 1/13/09
Post by: Tamikosmom on January 18, 2009, 10:02:42 PM
 ::MonkeyHaHa::   ::MonkeyHaHa::   ::MonkeyHaHa::

I need to get a glass of water.  I cannot stop laughing.

 ::MonkeyHaHa::   ::MonkeyHaHa::   ::MonkeyHaHa::

Later, Janet


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #793 1/13/09
Post by: SuzieQ on January 18, 2009, 10:05:50 PM
I thought Kyle didn't want the latest pictures out there. What was all the fuss about Kermit bringing them to SM?  Has anyone seen Hotshot's site lately? ::MonkeyConfused::

I haven't seen Hotshots site lately?  Do you have a link?


Sorry

http://arubassilence.bravehost.com/
 ::MonkeyCool::

Thank You for the Link!  ::MonkeyWink::
[/quote


You are very welcome. ::MonkeyCool::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #793 1/13/09
Post by: hotping on January 18, 2009, 10:05:52 PM
::MonkeyHaHa::   ::MonkeyHaHa::   ::MonkeyHaHa::

I need to get a glass of water.  I cannot stop laughing.

 ::MonkeyHaHa::   ::MonkeyHaHa::   ::MonkeyHaHa::

Later, Janet
Uncontrollable laughing and Water will make You pee Your pants.....  ::MonkeyTongue::  ::MonkeyHaHa:: Just kidding!


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #793 1/13/09
Post by: Blue Moon on January 18, 2009, 10:05:56 PM
::MonkeyHaHa::   ::MonkeyHaHa::   ::MonkeyHaHa::

I need to get a glass of water.  I cannot stop laughing.

 ::MonkeyHaHa::   ::MonkeyHaHa::   ::MonkeyHaHa::

Later, Janet

Janet---breath.      ::MonkeyLaugh::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #793 1/13/09
Post by: Blue Moon on January 18, 2009, 10:08:22 PM
Thanks SuzieQ, that was an interesting read.

Sorry, I spelled your name wrong.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #793 1/13/09
Post by: SuzieQ on January 18, 2009, 10:10:16 PM
Thanks SusieQ, that was an interesting read.


I thought so too. Did you catch where she was telling Beth about all SHE had to do at the travel show? And who is CJ1?  ::MonkeyNoNo::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #793 1/13/09
Post by: Tamikosmom on January 18, 2009, 10:10:35 PM
::MonkeyHaHa::   ::MonkeyHaHa::   ::MonkeyHaHa::

I need to get a glass of water.  I cannot stop laughing.

 ::MonkeyHaHa::   ::MonkeyHaHa::   ::MonkeyHaHa::

Later, Janet
Uncontrollable laughing and Water will make You pee Your pants.....  ::MonkeyTongue::  ::MonkeyHaHa:: Just kidding!

I did not pee my pants but ... I spit water all over the sink.  I have not laughed so hard in a long time.  My hubby just looked at me sadly and shook his head.

 ::MonkeyHaHa::

Janet


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #793 1/13/09
Post by: texasmom on January 18, 2009, 10:13:16 PM
::MonkeyHaHa::   ::MonkeyHaHa::   ::MonkeyHaHa::

I need to get a glass of water.  I cannot stop laughing.

 ::MonkeyHaHa::   ::MonkeyHaHa::   ::MonkeyHaHa::

Later, Janet
Uncontrollable laughing and Water will make You pee Your pants.....  ::MonkeyTongue::  ::MonkeyHaHa:: Just kidding!

I did not pee my pants but ... I spit water all over the sink.  I have not laughed so hard in a long time.  My hubby just looked at me sadly and shook his head.

 ::MonkeyHaHa::

Janet

 ::MonkeyHaHa:: 


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #793 1/13/09
Post by: hotping on January 18, 2009, 10:13:26 PM
::MonkeyHaHa::   ::MonkeyHaHa::   ::MonkeyHaHa::

I need to get a glass of water.  I cannot stop laughing.

 ::MonkeyHaHa::   ::MonkeyHaHa::   ::MonkeyHaHa::

Later, Janet
Uncontrollable laughing and Water will make You pee Your pants.....  ::MonkeyTongue::  ::MonkeyHaHa:: Just kidding!

I did not pee my pants but ... I spit water all over the sink.  I have not laughed so hard in a long time.  My hubby just looked at me sadly and shook his head.

 ::MonkeyHaHa::

Janet
You have Me laughing and I don't even know exactly what You were laughing about.....Oh Well Laughing is good!  ::MonkeyLaugh::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #793 1/13/09
Post by: Keepthefaith on January 18, 2009, 10:13:39 PM

<snipped>

I believe there are many sides to any coin...

<snipped>



Whiskeygirl ... there are only two sides to a coin.  Either you believe Kyle Kingman's own words or ... you believe Kyle Kingman is a liar.

Which is it?

Respectfully, Janet

Janet,

Respectfully, there are many possible sides to a coin.  What comes to mind are two broad sides and the side that goes 'around', the diameter.  Sometimes, the diameter has multiple ridges, with many more sides.  Some coins I have seen have a hole in the center.

Sometimes, it's hard to know where the truth has landed, on a broad side, or a side/diameter.  Sometimes, maybe all that is exposed are some ridges.  The broad sides remain hidden.  Maybe all that is visible is the donut hole in the middle.  Must remains to be explored.

I have no way of knowing what the truth is from the many posts by Kermit.  There are many sides of the truth/story/facts that remain hidden to me.

jmho

Whiskeygirl

Kermit's posts are Kyle Kingman's own words.  Either you believe Kyle Kingman or you do not.  I am a believer.

Janet

Logic Dictates.I try to stay out of the world of semantics when at all possible!


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #793 1/13/09
Post by: Blue Moon on January 18, 2009, 10:15:23 PM
Thanks SusieQ, that was an interesting read.


I thought so too. Did you catch where she was telling Beth about all SHE had to do at the travel show? And who is CJ1?  ::MonkeyNoNo::

No I didn't catch that, I was reading at the bottom about her being tricked by Satish Kalpoe posting in a forum.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #793 1/13/09
Post by: Keepthefaith on January 18, 2009, 10:16:13 PM
Did HotShot ask Kyle to post those photos?Liscensing agreement?Just asking?


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #793 1/13/09
Post by: klaasend on January 18, 2009, 10:18:26 PM
Thanks SusieQ, that was an interesting read.


I thought so too. Did you catch where she was telling Beth about all SHE had to do at the travel show? And who is CJ1?  ::MonkeyNoNo::

Long story but CJ was another SM member who went to the Boston Travel show with Hotshot and ******* and others.  Some of them got angry with Hotshot. 


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #793 1/13/09
Post by: hotping on January 18, 2009, 10:18:45 PM
Did HotShot ask Kyle to post those photos?Liscensing agreement?Just asking?
Oh I'm sure She did.... ::MonkeyRoll::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #793 1/13/09
Post by: klaasend on January 18, 2009, 10:19:24 PM
Did HotShot ask Kyle to post those photos?Liscensing agreement?Just asking?

Good questions, LOL  ::MonkeyLaugh::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #793 1/13/09
Post by: texasmom on January 18, 2009, 10:19:54 PM
Did HotShot ask Kyle to post those photos?Liscensing agreement?Just asking?
Oh I'm sure She did.... ::MonkeyRoll::

 ::MonkeyLaugh::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #793 1/13/09
Post by: WhiskeyGirl on January 18, 2009, 10:21:39 PM

I believe there are many sides to any coin...

I also recall reading an email Kermit posted from Kyle, indicating that some of Kyles posts may have been taken out of context.  Since I was not involved in the secret forum, I don't know what the actual flow of conversation was...

What is an 'opinion'?  Educated guess?  Uneducated guess?  Best guess?  100% accurate 100% of the time?

jmho


If i;m readin this right.You believe Kermit has taken some of Kyle's words out of context?Correct me if i'm wrong.

Hey ... th Natalee's Freebirds' would not be in contact with Beth Holloway in regards to Kyle Kingman's own words if those words could not be backed up in a factual way ... backed up through an IP number.

Janet

++++++


klassend
Re: Natalee Case Discussion #787 12/24/08 -
« Reply #411 on: December 30, 2008, 06:53:44 PM »


Sent to me by Natalee's Freebirds:

Please feel free (if you'd like) to post this at your board.
 
During the journey of the Persistence to Aruba, Kyle reached out and emailed with us.  During that time, one of the questions posed to him was regarding protocol if/when Natalee's remains were found.
 
Kyle's response was that he was unsure, but felt that would be settled before the search began.
 
The cautions were given to him about the lack of integrity on the part of Aruba's law enforcement, prosecutor's office, and its judiciary.
 
Contact with Kyle continued throughout the duration of the search by the Persistence.
 
Once back home, Kyle asked us for our help.  He was very concerned about the activities that transpired during their search - specifically surrounding the find of the fishing cage and its contents.  Kyle wanted our help in presenting this information in a factual way, to then be given to Natalee's family. 
 
This was March 18, 2008.  At that time, Kyle assured us he had just recently sent the images from the Dec 30th and Jan 7th dives to the FBI, but had never received a response from them.
 
We later found that to be false.
 
Also at that time, Beth's brother saw the images Kyle had shared with us - but none of the detail he shared later.

We compiled the images Kyle presented us, along with his opinions and the facts surrounding the sequence of events regarding that fishing cage.  Kyle stated he would be getting in touch with Beth Holloway.
 
We later found out that never happened.

At this time, Kyle shared with us the broadcast networks he had approached in February, in an attempt to sell these images to the highest bidder.
 
This didn't concern us greatly at that time - as we were under the impression US law enforcement and Natalee's family had already been made aware of their find.
 
Approximately May 2008 Kyle began dodging questions for details (we had asked for names of Aruban police and divers to be included in our documentation of these events), hedging on moving forward with this, and then he completely disappeared from our board.
 
During that time, we learned Kyle had never contacted Beth, or Dave, or the FBI with this information.
 
We put our original plan into motion - that of presenting this information in a clear and concise manner, and we sent it to Beth Holloway.
 
Beth was disturbed, needed time to digest the information, and wanted to share it with someone she trusts.
 
When Tim Miller was returning to Aruba this past fall, Beth gave us permission to release this information publicly.

At that point, we gave it to John Kelly, Carmen Adams with the FBI, and got it ready for public consumption.
 
The next step was to publish this information at our blog.
 
One of our members felt we were betraying Kyle in doing so, contacted him, and he re-surfaced at our site with threats of litigation against us - stating this was his "intellectual property" and we could not use it.
 
That of course concerned us greatly - as none of us could afford to be sued.
 
He also stated at that time, Luis Shaefer had just recently sold the rights of the video of these images to a broadcast company for the purposes of a documentary.
 
We contacted legal counsel and were advised to keep our distance from any Persistence crew member, in the face of potential obstruction/accessory charges.
 
At this point, one of our members decided to brace for the possibility of civil litigation, resigned from our membership to protect it from same, and posted what he knows to be factual at SM.
 
Kyle did tell us human remains were found in that fish cage.
 
Kyle did tell us about John Silvetti's intent to open an office on the island of Aruba, to enable him ease in conducting business in South America, and Aruba.
 
Kyle also told us of John's absolute refusal to give that fish cage and its contents any credence - before even it was inspected on Jan 7th.
 
Kyle told us in no uncertain terms that Tim Miller and Dateline were abruptly removed from the Persistence on Dec 30, resulting in only Persistence crew being aboard between that date and the Jan 7 dive of the Arubans.
 
Nothing that was posted at SM by kermit was incorrect, out of context, or in any way false.
 
Regards,
 
Former Natalee's Freebirds Administrator

Natalee and her family deserve justice - and we will not let up until they have it!

http://scaredmonkeys.net/index.php?topic=4269.msg603349#msg603349

Janet,

I was thinking about this post by Kermit -

http://scaredmonkeys.net/index.php?topic=4246.msg592482;topicseen#msg592482

Quote from: kermit
Re: Natalee Case Discussion #786 12/17/08 -
« Reply #540 on: December 19, 2008, 02:15:18 PM »


Kyle sent me this today


Kermit,
 
You and the others agreed to a statement of confidentiality and nondisclosure at FB.  Before I posted any information, I posted a copyright notice at the very start which disallowed ANY and ALL of my posts, intellectual property, or pictures to leave the spot they were posted.  Everyone, including yourself, acknowledged this affirmatively. A lawyer said that ownership of that posted material cannot be transferred by a general claim of copyright such as a claim made on the front page of a website, or even by verbal consent. Written agreement, meaning a signed agreement, is required for the post to be owned by the site owner. Without a signed agreement, the poster owns the post. I did not give you permission, which I have stated many times when you were in violation. While the rest agreed, you violated this legal agreement repeatedly. You have taken many of my posts, snipped what you wanted to put them into your context, and then shared them in a public forum.  The "public domain" notion only applies where someone has copyright ownership over the work in the first case and that ownership has lapsed. In that case, all posts can be freely reproduced by anyone, anywhere, without violating copyright law. However, this is clearly not the case.
 
I will state this with absolute clarity so there is no misunderstanding:
I have confirmed with the FBI on multiple instances that they have had possession of the ROV videos since very early on. I personally didn't send the ROV footage to them because another project lead had already at the first opportunity while we were still in Aruba. I sent all of the ROV screen shots directly to the FBI the day they were acquired.  I also got confirmation back in February by Tim Trahan who was in constant contact with Beth during the search that she indeed had all the information including the statements and has seen the ROV videos. I personally confirmed all of this with the senior FBI agent in charge of the investigation as well as given him my personal account of all that I witnessed and knew. They have this on record.  Birmingham is not the office in charge.
 
The information you have been spreading is not only inaccurate and a violation of a non-disclosure, it is slanderous and spreading misinformation. The damage it has done to my professional relationship with J. Silvetti is incalculable which has a direct effect on my ability to provide for my family, which includes my daughter named after Natalee.
 
I have neither publicly responded to your provocative antics, or retaliated with personal attacks in response to yours. I also have never threatened you as you publicly claimed.
 
I recently asked the senior FBI agent in charge how I should handle this situation which you have incited.  I thought his response was terrific. He replied: "Just sit back and keep quiet.  Kermit doesn't matter".
So this is exactly what I've done. I wrote this letter to you as a gesture of courtesy in hopes it would save you from further embarrassment from those who actually know something about this case.  I'm not referring to myself, rather the family and lead investigators who are out legitimately investigating this case in pursuit of justice right to the top.
 
Sincerely,
 
Kyle







From Kyle: I have not given anything to the FBI since the pictures and statements from Dec 29th
http://scaredmonkeys.net/index.php?topic=4179.msg557660#msg557660

From Kyle: May 8, 2008: "I've talked with Peter Shouten numerous times back in February. He hasn't seen anything but knows about the blue fabrics. DeVries and Endemol was interested in purchasing the ROV footage and I was working between them, ABC, and CBS to strike a deal."
http://scaredmonkeys.net/index.php?topic=4179.msg557660#msg557660


Kyle stated: "neither Dave, Robin, or Beth has seen any of the ROV footage aside from what was broadcasted on Dateline or the pictures leaked from the FBI to Dave (and Robin H.). Beth has seen nothing in my knowledge."
http://scaredmonkeys.net/index.php?topic=4209.120

IMHO 'context' may be subject to the view point of the reader.  

Are those Kyles words?  

What was the flow of discussion?  What question was Kyle answering?  What was the topic of conversation?  Brainstorming?  Intended or not intended to be fact?  Words offered as a best guess?

I just don't know the 'context' of what Kyle was communicating.  I may or may not believe they are Kyle's words, not for me to decide with my limited information.  I DO NOT know the story he was trying to communicate.  I can only guess at the story Kermit was trying to tell.  

I choose to believe the truth is still out there in the watery grave around Aruba.

just my humble opinions


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #793 1/13/09
Post by: texasmom on January 18, 2009, 10:22:20 PM
I think I may need a glass of water now!   ::MonkeyHaHa::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #793 1/13/09
Post by: klaasend on January 18, 2009, 10:22:43 PM
::MonkeyHaHa::   ::MonkeyHaHa::   ::MonkeyHaHa::

I need to get a glass of water.  I cannot stop laughing.

 ::MonkeyHaHa::   ::MonkeyHaHa::   ::MonkeyHaHa::

Later, Janet
Uncontrollable laughing and Water will make You pee Your pants.....  ::MonkeyTongue::  ::MonkeyHaHa:: Just kidding!

I did not pee my pants but ... I spit water all over the sink.  I have not laughed so hard in a long time.  My hubby just looked at me sadly and shook his head.

 ::MonkeyHaHa::

Janet

I guess telling your husband that Hotshot is playing both sides of the coins won't help, huh?   ::MonkeyHaHa::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #793 1/13/09
Post by: Tamikosmom on January 18, 2009, 10:24:01 PM
::MonkeyHaHa::   ::MonkeyHaHa::   ::MonkeyHaHa::

I need to get a glass of water.  I cannot stop laughing.

 ::MonkeyHaHa::   ::MonkeyHaHa::   ::MonkeyHaHa::

Later, Janet
Uncontrollable laughing and Water will make You pee Your pants.....  ::MonkeyTongue::  ::MonkeyHaHa:: Just kidding!

I did not pee my pants but ... I spit water all over the sink.  I have not laughed so hard in a long time.  My hubby just looked at me sadly and shook his head.

 ::MonkeyHaHa::

Janet

I guess telling your husband that Hotshot is playing both sides of the coins won't help, huh?   ::MonkeyHaHa::

Nope!!

 ::MonkeyHaHa::

Janet



Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #793 1/13/09
Post by: texasmom on January 18, 2009, 10:26:48 PM
(http://i21.photobucket.com/albums/b258/texasmom55/Natalee/CarpePicNatalee1.png)

JUSTICE FOR NATALEE!!!!   


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #793 1/13/09
Post by: Blue Moon on January 18, 2009, 10:32:10 PM
Got to say good nite.  Another busy week coming up.

Blue Moon


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #793 1/13/09
Post by: Keepthefaith on January 18, 2009, 10:32:27 PM
WhiskeyGirl

"I choose to believe the truth is still out there in the watery grave around Aruba."


Keepthefaith,
I choose to believe through Kyle's words that we'll never know if Natalee was in the trap/cage due to Silvetti allowing the ALE to remove and leave with the content's of the cage.Guess we'll never know.I have a feeling the Persistence will NEVER go back there to search.I think they already know the answer.JMOO

I STAND WITH THE FROG

KEEPTHEFAITH!


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #793 1/13/09
Post by: hotping on January 18, 2009, 10:32:53 PM
I think I may need a glass of water now!   ::MonkeyHaHa::
Or Crown and Coke!  ::MonkeyHaHa::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #793 1/13/09
Post by: Keepthefaith on January 18, 2009, 10:32:56 PM
Got to say good nite.  Another busy week coming up.

Blue Moon

Good night BlueMoon!


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #793 1/13/09
Post by: Tamikosmom on January 18, 2009, 10:35:03 PM
Got to say good nite.  Another busy week coming up.

Blue Moon

Good Night Blue Moon.

Janet


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #793 1/13/09
Post by: texasmom on January 18, 2009, 10:37:04 PM
Got to say good nite.  Another busy week coming up.

Blue Moon

Goodnight Blue Moon!  I'm lucky...tomorrow off!  Yippppeeeeeeee! ::MonkeyDance::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #793 1/13/09
Post by: texasmom on January 18, 2009, 10:38:08 PM
I think I may need a glass of water now!   ::MonkeyHaHa::
Or Crown and Coke!  ::MonkeyHaHa::

that could work too!   ::MonkeyWink::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #793 1/13/09
Post by: SuzieQ on January 18, 2009, 10:42:52 PM
Thanks SusieQ, that was an interesting read.


I thought so too. Did you catch where she was telling Beth about all SHE had to do at the travel show? And who is CJ1?  ::MonkeyNoNo::

Long story but CJ was another SM member who went to the Boston Travel show with Hotshot and ******* and others.  Some of them got angry with Hotshot. 


Thanks Klaas. I took a few months off and missed some things.
But, like everyone else, I couldn't stay away.  Don't post much, but read everything.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #793 1/13/09
Post by: hotping on January 18, 2009, 10:43:52 PM
I think I may need a glass of water now!   ::MonkeyHaHa::
Or Crown and Coke!  ::MonkeyHaHa::

that could work too!   ::MonkeyWink::
::MonkeyTongue:: ::MonkeyHaHa::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #793 1/13/09
Post by: texasmom on January 18, 2009, 10:44:25 PM
(http://i21.photobucket.com/albums/b258/texasmom55/Natalee/CarpePicNatalee1.png)

JUSTICE FOR NATALEE!!!!   



Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #793 1/13/09
Post by: klaasend on January 18, 2009, 10:45:15 PM
Let me get this straight.  Hotshot doesn't like us talking about Kyle and the trap but it's OK for her to talk about the trap.  As long as it looks like it's her idea.    ::MonkeyNoNo:: ::MonkeyRoll::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #793 1/13/09
Post by: hotping on January 18, 2009, 10:45:46 PM
KYCat..I thought We were going to talk about the shoes..... ::MonkeyCool::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #793 1/13/09
Post by: ospainter on January 18, 2009, 10:45:46 PM
Thanks SusieQ, that was an interesting read.


I thought so too. Did you catch where she was telling Beth about all SHE had to do at the travel show? And who is CJ1?  ::MonkeyNoNo::

SuzieQ

Here is what Hotshot said here:

http://scaredmonkeys.net/index.php?topic=2637.60

Most of you know why I find the need to go to Aruba one last time, and I went looking for a deal, I am guessing some people didn’t agree with that, but I started something that needs to be finished, and that’s what it will take for me to finish.  Sorry if I offended anyone in my team with that, but I guess you have to know my whole story before you judge me. 



OS





Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #793 1/13/09
Post by: klaasend on January 18, 2009, 10:46:16 PM
(http://i118.photobucket.com/albums/o100/klaasen3/Sub5/moderator%20pics/MODLOCK1.gif)

Please move to NCD# 794

http://scaredmonkeys.net/index.php?topic=4388.0