Scared Monkeys Discussion Forum

Natalee Holloway => LCD Archive => Topic started by: 2NJSons_Mom on January 28, 2009, 09:26:56 PM



Title: Natalee Case Discussion #797 1/30/09 - 2/1/09
Post by: 2NJSons_Mom on January 28, 2009, 09:26:56 PM
http://i118.photobucket.com/albums/o100/klaasen3/Sub3/Natalee2.swf



JUSTICE FOR NATALEE


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #797 1/30/09 -
Post by: Keepthefaith on January 30, 2009, 01:33:45 PM
because I can ...  ::MonkeyTongue::
::MonkeyLaugh:: ::MonkeyTongue::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #797 1/30/09 -
Post by: Keepthefaith on January 30, 2009, 01:34:25 PM
because I can ...  ::MonkeyTongue::
::MonkeyLaugh:: ::MonkeyTongue::

Sucker.Trix are for Kids Nut! ::MonkeyLaugh::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #797 1/30/09 -
Post by: MuffyBee on January 30, 2009, 01:41:09 PM
(http://bestsmileys.com/peeping/7.gif)


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #797 1/30/09 -
Post by: Keepthefaith on January 30, 2009, 01:42:48 PM
(http://bestsmileys.com/peeping/7.gif)

You Mods are funny!God Bless you all! ::MonkeyLaugh::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #797 1/30/09 -
Post by: Nut44x4 on January 30, 2009, 01:43:04 PM
MUFFY! LOL!


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #797 1/30/09 -
Post by: MuffyBee on January 30, 2009, 01:43:49 PM
Note:  3 replies, 67 views on this brand new thread...


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #797 1/30/09 -
Post by: sharon on January 30, 2009, 01:44:40 PM
I just want to say  to Anna that I am sorry if it appeared I was yelling at you in the last thread :oops:

That was definitely not my intent. And your point, that no one is disputing our statement, is exactly on target.

I just wanted to make sure that the post was easily 'readable'. It appears that sometimes we have posters who don't bother to read what other people post before they begin the derailment, and I wanted to do my part to make sure this was 'catchy'.

Because it is the truth.

Big apologies if you thought for even one moment I was yelling at you :-(


now i gotta go bak ta work


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #797 1/30/09 -
Post by: sharon on January 30, 2009, 01:45:37 PM
(http://bestsmileys.com/peeping/7.gif)


 ::MonkeyLaugh:: ::MonkeyLaugh::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #797 1/30/09 -
Post by: Anna on January 30, 2009, 01:47:03 PM
TY, Sharon.  No, I didn't think you were yelling at me.

I just wand to see the proof that Kyle did NOT say all those things if anybody has it.

No one does, it seems.



Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #797 1/30/09 -
Post by: Keepthefaith on January 30, 2009, 01:52:01 PM
TY, Sharon.  No, I didn't think you were yelling at me.

I just wand to see the proof that Kyle did NOT say all those things if anybody has it.

No one does, it seems.



Nope.But the people that talk with him seem to believe his rationalization for such statements. ::MonkeyConfused::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #797 1/30/09 -
Post by: Anna on January 30, 2009, 01:54:47 PM
Kermit never said the email from Lala's was addressesd to him or sent directy from her to him.

Kermit never said the email from Lala's was addressesd to him or sent directy from her to him.

Kermit never said the email from Lala's was addressesd to him or sent directy from her to him.




Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #797 1/30/09 -
Post by: Keepthefaith on January 30, 2009, 01:58:04 PM
LIFESONG

"Can someone please explain to me what Kermit's gender or occupation has to do with Natalee Holloway, her vicious murder, and the government-sanctioned coverup thereof?"


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #797 1/30/09 -
Post by: nonesuche on January 30, 2009, 01:58:50 PM
Amen Anna

Just thought I'd sign in, don't want to be perceived as a 'guest'  ::MonkeyHaHa::

Kermit, I want to apologize for all the slings and defamations against you, if others don't have the maturity to do so.

ldstlou, why don't you speak with Beth? If you are so determined to speak only with family and feel it's your inalienable right to do so - then speak with Beth please.

I frankly am tiring of seeing Natalee's family drug into this day after day after day.....but whatever you kids want.



Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #797 1/30/09 -
Post by: Tamikosmom on January 30, 2009, 02:00:50 PM
Amen Anna

Just thought I'd sign in, don't want to be perceived as a 'guest'  ::MonkeyHaHa::

Kermit, I want to apologize for all the slings and defamations against you, if others don't have the maturity to do so.

ldstlou, why don't you speak with Beth? If you are so determined to speak only with family and feel it's your inalienable right to do so - then speak with Beth please.

I frankly am tiring of seeing Natalee's family drug into this day after day after day.....but whatever you kids want.




Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #797 1/30/09 -
Post by: Keepthefaith on January 30, 2009, 02:01:23 PM
REE

"VMS, I speak for only myself, but I personally don't care what Kermit's occupation is.  IMO the emails she posted speak for themselves.  I have no problem with any of the emails posted, but I do take issue with the crap SS posted yesterday."

KERMIT

"Just so everyone here knows I am well aware of them giving that information over to Aruba too."   


KEEPTHEFAITH
I thought this was important to bring over in case you don't read the previous thread!




Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #797 1/30/09 -
Post by: ldstlou on January 30, 2009, 02:04:41 PM
Kermit never said the email from Lala's was addressesd to him or sent directy from her to him.

Kermit never said the email from Lala's was addressesd to him or sent directy from her to him.

Kermit never said the email from Lala's was addressesd to him or sent directy from her to him.




Jug does know. He may just not be informing Idstlou
Re: Natalee Case Discussion #793 1/13/09
January 17, 2009, 06:21:44 PM »
Kermit ... who is "I".
/http://scaredmonkeys.net/index.php?topic=4371.660
XXXX:  Sat Nov 22, 2008 8:10 am    Post subject:    Reply with quote
Here is a snippet from an email I rec'd from Lalas.
I asked Jug about Schaeffer...he is the oil guy. He was the one that provided the cash to get down there. Silvetti knew he would get more business from Schaeffer if he mapped....while they were looking...the ocean floor. All the crew was asked to do was look for Natalee or anything suspicious as in small things like a cage or bones or whatever.
They do a large mapping process while they are looking for the details. Schaeffer would use the large mapping of the general layout of the ocean floor to further look for oil...etc...while they looked for Natalee too.

Silvetti was the one that offered to look for Natalee and not Schaefer


She did so Ana


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #797 1/30/09 -
Post by: Tamikosmom on January 30, 2009, 02:04:50 PM
Amen Anna

Just thought I'd sign in, don't want to be perceived as a 'guest'  ::MonkeyHaHa::

Kermit, I want to apologize for all the slings and defamations against you, if others don't have the maturity to do so.  

ldstlou, why don't you speak with Beth? If you are so determined to speak only with family and feel it's your inalienable right to do so - then speak with Beth please.

I frankly am tiring of seeing Natalee's family drug into this day after day after day.....but whatever you kids want.



Hi none

Hugs.

I believe if you read the this mornings posts on the last thread ... Monkeys were upholding Kermit 100%.

O/T!  Hey ... I will not tell the other Monkeys but ... have you met that tall, handsome European yet.

 ::MonkeyTongue::

Janet


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #797 1/30/09 -
Post by: ldstlou on January 30, 2009, 02:07:17 PM
Amen Anna

Just thought I'd sign in, don't want to be perceived as a 'guest'  ::MonkeyHaHa::

Kermit, I want to apologize for all the slings and defamations against you, if others don't have the maturity to do so.

ldstlou, why don't you speak with Beth? If you are so determined to speak only with family and feel it's your inalienable right to do so - then speak with Beth please.

I frankly am tiring of seeing Natalee's family drug into this day after day after day.....but whatever you kids want.



Nonsie, I don't know why you keep wanting to jump me? You and I have always gotten along. First you tell me not to bother the family, then you tell me to call Beth. Do you just want to give me a hard time and if so why?

I know Jug enough to be able to ask him about the Persistence. I asked him and he answered. Why does that bother you?


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #797 1/30/09 -
Post by: 2NJSons_Mom on January 30, 2009, 02:07:22 PM
Kermit never said the email from Lala's was addressesd to him or sent directy from her to him.

Kermit never said the email from Lala's was addressesd to him or sent directy from her to him.

Kermit never said the email from Lala's was addressesd to him or sent directy from her to him.




Jug does know. He may just not be informing Idstlou
Re: Natalee Case Discussion #793 1/13/09
January 17, 2009, 06:21:44 PM »
Kermit ... who is "I".
/http://scaredmonkeys.net/index.php?topic=4371.660
XXXX:  Sat Nov 22, 2008 8:10 am    Post subject:    Reply with quote
Here is a snippet from an email I rec'd from Lalas.
I asked Jug about Schaeffer...he is the oil guy. He was the one that provided the cash to get down there. Silvetti knew he would get more business from Schaeffer if he mapped....while they were looking...the ocean floor. All the crew was asked to do was look for Natalee or anything suspicious as in small things like a cage or bones or whatever.
They do a large mapping process while they are looking for the details. Schaeffer would use the large mapping of the general layout of the ocean floor to further look for oil...etc...while they looked for Natalee too.

Silvetti was the one that offered to look for Natalee and not Schaefer


She did so Ana


Lisa, look at that quote again.  XXXX sent it to Kermit and said he/she rec'd it from Lala's. 


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #797 1/30/09 -
Post by: Ree on January 30, 2009, 02:08:18 PM
From VMS last thread

Ree - I have presented facts.  Please check your facts.  I have not posted emails.  If you will check back through the threads, you will see that each of these statements are directly from posts made on SM in the NAH thread.  These are not emails.  I do not post emails.  These are SM discussions.

VMS, I was not referring to your emails.  I was referring tho those b*tching about Kermit posting emails from others and SS posting Kermit's personal info.  Again I don't give a d*amn who Kermit is, because her documentation speaks for itself.



Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #797 1/30/09 -
Post by: ldstlou on January 30, 2009, 02:08:27 PM
I have library duty so I have to run. Have a good day all.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #797 1/30/09 -
Post by: 2NJSons_Mom on January 30, 2009, 02:09:43 PM
Amen Anna

Just thought I'd sign in, don't want to be perceived as a 'guest'  ::MonkeyHaHa::

Kermit, I want to apologize for all the slings and defamations against you, if others don't have the maturity to do so.

ldstlou, why don't you speak with Beth? If you are so determined to speak only with family and feel it's your inalienable right to do so - then speak with Beth please.

I frankly am tiring of seeing Natalee's family drug into this day after day after day.....but whatever you kids want.



Nonsie, I don't know why you keep wanting to jump me? You and I have always gotten along. First you tell me not to bother the family, then you tell me to call Beth. Do you just want to give me a hard time and if so why?

I know Jug enough to be able to ask him about the Persistence. I asked him and he answered. Why does that bother you?

Maybe it's how you got to know Jug that may be bothersome or uncomfortable for many of us.  I, personally, would not contact a family member directly.  jmo


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #797 1/30/09 -
Post by: Keepthefaith on January 30, 2009, 02:09:44 PM
I have library duty so I have to run. Have a good day all.

Guess you won't get your answer 2nj! ::MonkeyConfused::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #797 1/30/09 -
Post by: Anna on January 30, 2009, 02:10:53 PM
Kermit never said the email from Lala's was addressesd to him or sent directy from her to him.

Kermit never said the email from Lala's was addressesd to him or sent directy from her to him.

Kermit never said the email from Lala's was addressesd to him or sent directy from her to him.




Jug does know. He may just not be informing Idstlou
Re: Natalee Case Discussion #793 1/13/09
January 17, 2009, 06:21:44 PM »
Kermit ... who is "I".
/http://scaredmonkeys.net/index.php?topic=4371.660
XXXX:  Sat Nov 22, 2008 8:10 am    Post subject:    Reply with quote
Here is a snippet from an email I rec'd from Lalas.
I asked Jug about Schaeffer...he is the oil guy. He was the one that provided the cash to get down there. Silvetti knew he would get more business from Schaeffer if he mapped....while they were looking...the ocean floor. All the crew was asked to do was look for Natalee or anything suspicious as in small things like a cage or bones or whatever.
They do a large mapping process while they are looking for the details. Schaeffer would use the large mapping of the general layout of the ocean floor to further look for oil...etc...while they looked for Natalee too.

Silvetti was the one that offered to look for Natalee and not Schaefer


She did so Ana



She did NOT, isa.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #797 1/30/09 -
Post by: Tamikosmom on January 30, 2009, 02:13:34 PM
(http://bestsmileys.com/peeping/7.gif)

MuffyBee ... now that you have a barricade for protection ... will you aim and fire at the next driveby with words that have been carefully considered.

 ::MonkeyHaHa::

Janet



Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #797 1/30/09 -
Post by: Anna on January 30, 2009, 02:14:00 PM
Kermit never said the email from Lala's was addressesd to him or sent directy from her to him.

Kermit never said the email from Lala's was addressesd to him or sent directy from her to him.

Kermit never said the email from Lala's was addressesd to him or sent directy from her to him.




Jug does know. He may just not be informing Idstlou
Re: Natalee Case Discussion #793 1/13/09
January 17, 2009, 06:21:44 PM »
Kermit ... who is "I".
/http://scaredmonkeys.net/index.php?topic=4371.660
XXXX:  Sat Nov 22, 2008 8:10 am    Post subject:    Reply with quote
Here is a snippet from an email I rec'd from Lalas.
I asked Jug about Schaeffer...he is the oil guy. He was the one that provided the cash to get down there. Silvetti knew he would get more business from Schaeffer if he mapped....while they were looking...the ocean floor. All the crew was asked to do was look for Natalee or anything suspicious as in small things like a cage or bones or whatever.
They do a large mapping process while they are looking for the details. Schaeffer would use the large mapping of the general layout of the ocean floor to further look for oil...etc...while they looked for Natalee too.

Silvetti was the one that offered to look for Natalee and not Schaefer


She did so Ana



She did NOT, isa.


That is within the context of the quote, even after the date, etc.  That is what the person who sent this to Kermit said, not Kermit.



Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #797 1/30/09 -
Post by: 2NJSons_Mom on January 30, 2009, 02:14:17 PM
I have library duty so I have to run. Have a good day all.

Guess you won't get your answer 2nj! ::MonkeyConfused::

(http://bestsmileys.com/frustrated/5.gif)

I will keep the words in my head to myself, at this time. 


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #797 1/30/09 -
Post by: MuffyBee on January 30, 2009, 02:18:01 PM
Hi Janet (http://bestsmileys.com/waving/5.gif)



Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #797 1/30/09 -
Post by: ldstlou on January 30, 2009, 02:19:44 PM
Amen Anna

Just thought I'd sign in, don't want to be perceived as a 'guest'  ::MonkeyHaHa::

Kermit, I want to apologize for all the slings and defamations against you, if others don't have the maturity to do so.

ldstlou, why don't you speak with Beth? If you are so determined to speak only with family and feel it's your inalienable right to do so - then speak with Beth please.

I frankly am tiring of seeing Natalee's family drug into this day after day after day.....but whatever you kids want.



Nonsie, I don't know why you keep wanting to jump me? You and I have always gotten along. First you tell me not to bother the family, then you tell me to call Beth. Do you just want to give me a hard time and if so why?

I know Jug enough to be able to ask him about the Persistence. I asked him and he answered. Why does that bother you?

Maybe it's how you got to know Jug that may be bothersome or uncomfortable for many of us.  I, personally, would not contact a family member directly.  jmo

Have no idea what you are talking about nor will I address this. If there is a rumor you have heard and want me to address, just send me an e-mail...but other than that..won't address slander or inuendo.
I am late...library duty calls.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #797 1/30/09 -
Post by: Keepthefaith on January 30, 2009, 02:19:56 PM
REE

"VMS, I speak for only myself, but I personally don't care what Kermit's occupation is.  IMO the emails she posted speak for themselves.  I have no problem with any of the emails posted, but I do take issue with the crap SS posted yesterday."

KERMIT

"Just so everyone here knows I am well aware of them giving that information over to Aruba too."   


KEEPTHEFAITH
I thought this was important to bring over in case you don't read the previous thread!




Giving personal information to Aruba! ::MonkeyEek::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #797 1/30/09 -
Post by: 2NJSons_Mom on January 30, 2009, 02:20:13 PM
Kermit never said the email from Lala's was addressesd to him or sent directy from her to him.

Kermit never said the email from Lala's was addressesd to him or sent directy from her to him.

Kermit never said the email from Lala's was addressesd to him or sent directy from her to him.




Jug does know. He may just not be informing Idstlou
Re: Natalee Case Discussion #793 1/13/09
January 17, 2009, 06:21:44 PM »
Kermit ... who is "I".
/http://scaredmonkeys.net/index.php?topic=4371.660
XXXX:  Sat Nov 22, 2008 8:10 am    Post subject:    Reply with quote
Here is a snippet from an email I rec'd from Lalas.
I asked Jug about Schaeffer...he is the oil guy. He was the one that provided the cash to get down there. Silvetti knew he would get more business from Schaeffer if he mapped....while they were looking...the ocean floor. All the crew was asked to do was look for Natalee or anything suspicious as in small things like a cage or bones or whatever.
They do a large mapping process while they are looking for the details. Schaeffer would use the large mapping of the general layout of the ocean floor to further look for oil...etc...while they looked for Natalee too.

Silvetti was the one that offered to look for Natalee and not Schaefer


She did so Ana


Lisa, look at that quote again.  XXXX sent it to Kermit and said he/she rec'd it from Lala's. 

(From:) XXXX  (Date:)Sat Nov 22, 2008 8:10 am


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #797 1/30/09 -
Post by: Keepthefaith on January 30, 2009, 02:20:39 PM
Amen Anna

Just thought I'd sign in, don't want to be perceived as a 'guest'  ::MonkeyHaHa::

Kermit, I want to apologize for all the slings and defamations against you, if others don't have the maturity to do so.

ldstlou, why don't you speak with Beth? If you are so determined to speak only with family and feel it's your inalienable right to do so - then speak with Beth please.

I frankly am tiring of seeing Natalee's family drug into this day after day after day.....but whatever you kids want.



Nonsie, I don't know why you keep wanting to jump me? You and I have always gotten along. First you tell me not to bother the family, then you tell me to call Beth. Do you just want to give me a hard time and if so why?

I know Jug enough to be able to ask him about the Persistence. I asked him and he answered. Why does that bother you?

Maybe it's how you got to know Jug that may be bothersome or uncomfortable for many of us.  I, personally, would not contact a family member directly.  jmo

Have no idea what you are talking about nor will I address this. If there is a rumor you have heard and want me to address, just send me an e-mail...but other than that..won't address slander or inuendo.
I am late...library duty calls.

You still didn't answer 2nj question,and or Anna's?????????????????????


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #797 1/30/09 -
Post by: Lifesong on January 30, 2009, 02:20:58 PM
Kermit never said the email from Lala's was addressesd to him or sent directy from her to him.

Kermit never said the email from Lala's was addressesd to him or sent directy from her to him.

Kermit never said the email from Lala's was addressesd to him or sent directy from her to him.




Jug does know. He may just not be informing Idstlou
Re: Natalee Case Discussion #793 1/13/09
January 17, 2009, 06:21:44 PM »
Kermit ... who is "I".
/http://scaredmonkeys.net/index.php?topic=4371.660
XXXX:  Sat Nov 22, 2008 8:10 am    Post subject:    Reply with quote
Here is a snippet from an email I rec'd from Lalas.
I asked Jug about Schaeffer...

<snipped for stackaholics>



She did so Ana



She did NOT, isa.

 ::MonkeyHaHa::   ::MonkeyHaHa::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #797 1/30/09 -
Post by: Anna on January 30, 2009, 02:21:38 PM
Kermit never said the email from Lala's was addressesd to him or sent directy from her to him.

Kermit never said the email from Lala's was addressesd to him or sent directy from her to him.

Kermit never said the email from Lala's was addressesd to him or sent directy from her to him.




Jug does know. He may just not be informing Idstlou
Re: Natalee Case Discussion #793 1/13/09
January 17, 2009, 06:21:44 PM »
Kermit ... who is "I".
/http://scaredmonkeys.net/index.php?topic=4371.660
XXXX:  Sat Nov 22, 2008 8:10 am    Post subject:    Reply with quote
Here is a snippet from an email I rec'd from Lalas.
I asked Jug about Schaeffer...he is the oil guy. He was the one that provided the cash to get down there. Silvetti knew he would get more business from Schaeffer if he mapped....while they were looking...the ocean floor. All the crew was asked to do was look for Natalee or anything suspicious as in small things like a cage or bones or whatever.
They do a large mapping process while they are looking for the details. Schaeffer would use the large mapping of the general layout of the ocean floor to further look for oil...etc...while they looked for Natalee too.

Silvetti was the one that offered to look for Natalee and not Schaefer


She did so Ana


Lisa, look at that quote again.  XXXX sent it to Kermit and said he/she rec'd it from Lala's. 


As inappropriate as it is to contact the family directly, it would be very nice if those people who chose to do so anyway would at the least get the facts straight.  Sadly, they just can't be bothered with that aspect.



Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #797 1/30/09 -
Post by: Tamikosmom on January 30, 2009, 02:23:09 PM
If ... as Lou contends .. Jug Twitty continues to upholds the Persistence undertaking ... then I do not believe for one minute that Natalee's stepfather has received a full compilation of Kyle Kingsman's own words ... Kyle Kingsman's own words that expose the betrayal of John Silvetti ... the betrayal that implies the opportunity to bring his stepdaughter home to rest on American soil may have been lost forever.

Maybe the timing is right for Jug Twitty to be made aware.

Janet

+++++

'Scarborough Country' for July 14
updated 8:45 a.m. PT, Fri., July. 15, 2005


JUG TWITTY, NATALEE HOLLOWAY'S STEPFATHER: Beth and I have been through this emotional roller coaster. And all we want is Natalee, whether she's alive or dead. We want to bring her back to the United States, and we'll leave and they can do whatever they want to do.

http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/8551824/


'The Abrams Report' for July 1
updated 7:47 a.m. PT, Wed., July. 6, 2005


BETH HOLLOWAY TWITTY, NATALEE HOLLOWAY'S MOTHER:  We cannot forget to demand and expect to have Natalee.  Natalee deserves to return to her country.  She deserves it, and everyone knows it, Martin, every single person.  Every single person knows that.  They know it.

http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/8485029/


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #797 1/30/09 -
Post by: Tamikosmom on January 30, 2009, 02:25:07 PM
REE

"VMS, I speak for only myself, but I personally don't care what Kermit's occupation is.  IMO the emails she posted speak for themselves.  I have no problem with any of the emails posted, but I do take issue with the crap SS posted yesterday."

KERMIT

"Just so everyone here knows I am well aware of them giving that information over to Aruba too."   


KEEPTHEFAITH
I thought this was important to bring over in case you don't read the previous thread!




Giving personal information to Aruba! ::MonkeyEek::

It is referred to as "collaborating with the enemy" ... the enemy who has had an agenda since day one to prevent justice from prevailing for Natalee Holloway.

 ::MonkeyNoNo::

Janet


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #797 1/30/09 -
Post by: 2NJSons_Mom on January 30, 2009, 02:25:43 PM
Amen Anna

Just thought I'd sign in, don't want to be perceived as a 'guest'  ::MonkeyHaHa::

Kermit, I want to apologize for all the slings and defamations against you, if others don't have the maturity to do so.

ldstlou, why don't you speak with Beth? If you are so determined to speak only with family and feel it's your inalienable right to do so - then speak with Beth please.

I frankly am tiring of seeing Natalee's family drug into this day after day after day.....but whatever you kids want.



Nonsie, I don't know why you keep wanting to jump me? You and I have always gotten along. First you tell me not to bother the family, then you tell me to call Beth. Do you just want to give me a hard time and if so why?

I know Jug enough to be able to ask him about the Persistence. I asked him and he answered. Why does that bother you?

Maybe it's how you got to know Jug that may be bothersome or uncomfortable for many of us.  I, personally, would not contact a family member directly.  jmo

Have no idea what you are talking about nor will I address this. If there is a rumor you have heard and want me to address, just send me an e-mail...but other than that..won't address slander or inuendo.
I am late...library duty calls.

 ::MonkeyHaHa::   ::MonkeyNoNo::  No rumor, no slander or inuendo intended...I find it odd that you seem ruffled by my post.  Somehow, an initial contact had to occur, and it's highly unlikely that Jug sought out Lisa in St. Louis by phone or email.  Again, this is just my opinion, and I have no desire to speak to you other than here.   ::MonkeyTongue::



Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #797 1/30/09 -
Post by: klaasend on January 30, 2009, 02:26:02 PM
Kermit never said the email from Lala's was addressesd to him or sent directy from her to him.

Kermit never said the email from Lala's was addressesd to him or sent directy from her to him.

Kermit never said the email from Lala's was addressesd to him or sent directy from her to him.




Jug does know. He may just not be informing Idstlou
Re: Natalee Case Discussion #793 1/13/09
January 17, 2009, 06:21:44 PM »
Kermit ... who is "I".
/http://scaredmonkeys.net/index.php?topic=4371.660
XXXX:  Sat Nov 22, 2008 8:10 am    Post subject:    Reply with quote
Here is a snippet from an email I rec'd from Lalas.
I asked Jug about Schaeffer...he is the oil guy. He was the one that provided the cash to get down there. Silvetti knew he would get more business from Schaeffer if he mapped....while they were looking...the ocean floor. All the crew was asked to do was look for Natalee or anything suspicious as in small things like a cage or bones or whatever.
They do a large mapping process while they are looking for the details. Schaeffer would use the large mapping of the general layout of the ocean floor to further look for oil...etc...while they looked for Natalee too.

Silvetti was the one that offered to look for Natalee and not Schaefer


She did so Ana


Lisa, look at that quote again.  XXXX sent it to Kermit and said he/she rec'd it from Lala's. 


XXXX = LEAK



Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #797 1/30/09 -
Post by: Keepthefaith on January 30, 2009, 02:27:29 PM
REE

"VMS, I speak for only myself, but I personally don't care what Kermit's occupation is.  IMO the emails she posted speak for themselves.  I have no problem with any of the emails posted, but I do take issue with the crap SS posted yesterday."

KERMIT

"Just so everyone here knows I am well aware of them giving that information over to Aruba too."   


KEEPTHEFAITH
I thought this was important to bring over in case you don't read the previous thread!




Giving personal information to Aruba! ::MonkeyEek::

It is referred to as "collaborating with the enemy" ... the enemy who has had an agenda since day one to prevent justice from prevailing for Natalee Holloway.

 ::MonkeyNoNo::

Janet

I think this is VERY important and deserves as much attention as The Persistence!This is what Natalee's family has been up against since day one.It coming from people who purporte to be seeking JUSTICE FOR NATALEE is sickening!You all should be ASHAMED of yourselves! ::MonkeyNoNo::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #797 1/30/09 -
Post by: Lifesong on January 30, 2009, 02:29:24 PM

I find it very telling that they stayed for 4 months and the only human dive was the one done on the cage, which Silvetti & Trehan claim contained nothing.





Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #797 1/30/09 -
Post by: Keepthefaith on January 30, 2009, 02:30:07 PM

I find it very telling that they stayed for 4 months and the only human dive was the one done on the cage, which Silvetti & Trehan claim contained nothing.





Exactly Lifesong!Good thinking! ::MonkeyCool::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #797 1/30/09 -
Post by: Anna on January 30, 2009, 02:31:03 PM
Amen Anna

Just thought I'd sign in, don't want to be perceived as a 'guest'  ::MonkeyHaHa::

Kermit, I want to apologize for all the slings and defamations against you, if others don't have the maturity to do so.

ldstlou, why don't you speak with Beth? If you are so determined to speak only with family and feel it's your inalienable right to do so - then speak with Beth please.

I frankly am tiring of seeing Natalee's family drug into this day after day after day.....but whatever you kids want.



Nonsie, I don't know why you keep wanting to jump me? You and I have always gotten along. First you tell me not to bother the family, then you tell me to call Beth. Do you just want to give me a hard time and if so why?

I know Jug enough to be able to ask him about the Persistence. I asked him and he answered. Why does that bother you?

Maybe it's how you got to know Jug that may be bothersome or uncomfortable for many of us.  I, personally, would not contact a family member directly.  jmo

Have no idea what you are talking about nor will I address this. If there is a rumor you have heard and want me to address, just send me an e-mail...but other than that..won't address slander or inuendo.
I am late...library duty calls.


Oh, you WISH!

No, there is absolutely NO RUMOR but basic manners and appropriate behavior involved.  But I guess there is no way to explain that.  Either you realize and know what is appropriate or you don't.  Most adults do. 

How about we each one call up the family every time we can think of an excuse or even to referee our internet squabbles?

Haven't they been through enough?  Do they all have to change their numbers?  I'm sure they would be very reluctant to do that since they have given those numbers to people who might actually have information for them. 


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #797 1/30/09 -
Post by: nonesuche on January 30, 2009, 02:35:18 PM
Hugs back Janet......

You are such a good proofreader, please know I meant those who continue to slam Kermit's words, life, occupation, person - certainly not those of you who have always been supportive of Kermit.

No tall europeans yet.......can't say I'm looking but may I have some of your divine shoofly pie?

 ::MonkeyWink::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #797 1/30/09 -
Post by: Anna on January 30, 2009, 02:37:00 PM
2NJ said:

Anna, are you saying those of us here do not have clear heads?   


LOL!  You got me on that one.   ::MonkeyHaHa::

I should have said additional clear heads instead of more clear heads.  Yes, I do think it would help now to have additional clear heads.  To go with those already here, that is.





Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #797 1/30/09 -
Post by: nonesuche on January 30, 2009, 02:39:17 PM
ldstlou

My intent is not to "jump you". My intent is to simply state if you feel you must speak with the family that it might be best to contact Beth. You have Jug's opinion but does he speak for Beth? I don't know that answer.

Like Anna and NJ Son's Mom indicated, if it were me, I would not be calling or emailing the family about every inch of this debate. That is my personal choice and yes, you and I differ in that regard.

Agreeing to disagree is what adults do. I did not insult or jump you.



Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #797 1/30/09 -
Post by: Tamikosmom on January 30, 2009, 02:41:42 PM
THE PRODICAL SON

Luke 15:11-32 (NLT):

11 To illustrate the point further, Jesus told them this story: “A man had two sons.

12 The younger son told his father, ‘I want my share of your estate now before you die.’ So his father agreed to divide his wealth between his sons.

13 A few days later this younger son packed aLL his belongings and moved to a distant land, and there he wasted his money in wild living.

14 About the time his money ran out, a great famine swept over the land, and he began to starve.

15 He persuaded a local farmer to hire him, and the man sent him into his fields to feed the pigs.

16 The young man became so hungry that even the pods he was feeding the pigs looked good to him.  But no one gave him anything.

17 When he fina!y came to his senses, he said to himself, ‘At home even the hired
servants have food enough to spare, and here I am dying of hunger!

18 I will go home to my father and say, 'Father, I have sinned against both heaven and you,

19 and I am no longer worthy of being ca!ed your son. Please take me on as a
hired servant.'

20 So he returned home to his father. And while he was still a long way off, his
father saw him coming. Filled with love and compassion, he ran to his son,
embraced him, and kissed him.

21 His son said to him, ‘Father, I have sinned against both heaven and you, and I am no longer worthy of being called your son.’

22 But his father said to the servants, ‘Quick! Bring the finest robe in the house
and put it on him. Get a ring for his finger and sandals for his feet.

23 And kill the calf we have been fattening. We must celebrate with a feast, 24 for this son of mine was dead and has now returned to life. He was lost, but now he is found.’

So the party began.

+++++++




Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #797 1/30/09 -
Post by: Ree on January 30, 2009, 02:52:41 PM
ldstlou

My intent is not to "jump you". My intent is to simply state if you feel you must speak with the family that it might be best to contact Beth. You have Jug's opinion but does he speak for Beth? I don't know that answer.

Like Anna and NJ Son's Mom indicated, if it were me, I would not be calling or emailing the family about every inch of this debate. That is my personal choice and yes, you and I differ in that regard.

Agreeing to disagree is what adults do. I did not insult or jump you.



None,

I believe the problem is those who no longer want to be here also don't want to allow us to have or voice our own opinions.  Mention Kyle and Kermit and here they come.  I don't know what LDSLou's role in this is.  I have no problem with her opinions, but she cannot seem to allow us to have a discussion about ours without bashing Kermit.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #797 1/30/09 -
Post by: nonesuche on January 30, 2009, 02:58:14 PM
Thank you Ree, I appreciate your insight very much.



Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #797 1/30/09 -
Post by: Keepthefaith on January 30, 2009, 02:59:12 PM
ldstlou

My intent is not to "jump you". My intent is to simply state if you feel you must speak with the family that it might be best to contact Beth. You have Jug's opinion but does he speak for Beth? I don't know that answer.

Like Anna and NJ Son's Mom indicated, if it were me, I would not be calling or emailing the family about every inch of this debate. That is my personal choice and yes, you and I differ in that regard.

Agreeing to disagree is what adults do. I did not insult or jump you.



None,

I believe the problem is those who no longer want to be here also don't want to allow us to have or voice our own opinions.  Mention Kyle and Kermit and here they come.  I don't know what LDSLou's role in this is.  I have no problem with her opinions, but she cannot seem to allow us to have a discussion about ours without bashing Kermit.

And.Why is that? ::MonkeyConfused::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #797 1/30/09 -
Post by: Ree on January 30, 2009, 02:59:16 PM
Thank you Ree, I appreciate your insight very much.



It's good to see you back again.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #797 1/30/09 -
Post by: Ree on January 30, 2009, 03:02:51 PM
ldstlou

My intent is not to "jump you". My intent is to simply state if you feel you must speak with the family that it might be best to contact Beth. You have Jug's opinion but does he speak for Beth? I don't know that answer.

Like Anna and NJ Son's Mom indicated, if it were me, I would not be calling or emailing the family about every inch of this debate. That is my personal choice and yes, you and I differ in that regard.

Agreeing to disagree is what adults do. I did not insult or jump you.



None,

I believe the problem is those who no longer want to be here also don't want to allow us to have or voice our own opinions.  Mention Kyle and Kermit and here they come.  I don't know what LDSLou's role in this is.  I have no problem with her opinions, but she cannot seem to allow us to have a discussion about ours without bashing Kermit.

And.Why is that? ::MonkeyConfused::

IMHO somebody at CnG is feeding her crap.  She obviously isn't answering them all herself, because it appears she's not even reading the whole message she's responding too.  Shame, because I liked her.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #797 1/30/09 -
Post by: Tamikosmom on January 30, 2009, 03:04:38 PM
Hugs back Janet......

You are such a good proofreader, please know I meant those who continue to slam Kermit's words, life, occupation, person - certainly not those of you who have always been supportive of Kermit.

No tall europeans yet.......can't say I'm looking but may I have some of your divine shoofly  pie?

 ::MonkeyWink::

Sorry.  No can do.

By mistake ... I fed Kermit's Grandma's Shoofly Shoo Pie to my eldest son's French Canadian inlaws the other evening rather than my strawberry/rhubarb pie.  They wolfed down their first slice and ... requested seconds.

I assume that a nationality that considers frog legs cooked in a wine sauce as a delicacy will eat anything.

 ::MonkeyHaHa::

Hey ... to clarify ... I think this couple is just great ... even if I have to share my beautifuly two year old grandson with them.  I hate sharing.

  ::MonkeyWaa::

Janet


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #797 1/30/09 -
Post by: Tamikosmom on January 30, 2009, 03:06:32 PM
ldstlou

My intent is not to "jump you". My intent is to simply state if you feel you must speak with the family that it might be best to contact Beth. You have Jug's opinion but does he speak for Beth? I don't know that answer.

Like Anna and NJ Son's Mom indicated, if it were me, I would not be calling or emailing the family about every inch of this debate. That is my personal choice and yes, you and I differ in that regard.

Agreeing to disagree is what adults do. I did not insult or jump you.



None,

I believe the problem is those who no longer want to be here also don't want to allow us to have or voice our own opinions.  Mention Kyle and Kermit and here they come.  I don't know what LDSLou's role in this is.  I have no problem with her opinions, but she cannot seem to allow us to have a discussion about ours without bashing Kermit.

And.Why is that? ::MonkeyConfused::

IMHO somebody at CnG is feeding her crap.  She obviously isn't answering them all herself, because it appears she's not even reading the whole message she's responding too.  Shame, because I liked her.


Me too!

  ::MonkeyWaa::

Janet


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #797 1/30/09 -
Post by: Keepthefaith on January 30, 2009, 03:07:18 PM
ldstlou

My intent is not to "jump you". My intent is to simply state if you feel you must speak with the family that it might be best to contact Beth. You have Jug's opinion but does he speak for Beth? I don't know that answer.

Like Anna and NJ Son's Mom indicated, if it were me, I would not be calling or emailing the family about every inch of this debate. That is my personal choice and yes, you and I differ in that regard.

Agreeing to disagree is what adults do. I did not insult or jump you.



None,

I believe the problem is those who no longer want to be here also don't want to allow us to have or voice our own opinions.  Mention Kyle and Kermit and here they come.  I don't know what LDSLou's role in this is.  I have no problem with her opinions, but she cannot seem to allow us to have a discussion about ours without bashing Kermit.

And.Why is that? ::MonkeyConfused::

IMHO somebody at CnG is feeding her crap.  She obviously isn't answering them all herself, because it appears she's not even reading the whole message she's responding too.  Shame, because I liked her.

If she is friends with anyone at CnG that is self-explanatory to me.After Kermit posting that people are sending personal information to Aruba is dispicable to say the least.If you are going to associate yourself with such behaviour.You get NO respect from me!That's just my opinion!

KEEPTHEFAITH


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #797 1/30/09 -
Post by: nonesuche on January 30, 2009, 03:15:57 PM
Thank you Ree, I appreciate your insight very much.



It's good to see you back again.

Thank you Ree and thank you for trying to keep the work here honest too.  ::MonkeyWink::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #797 1/30/09 -
Post by: Lifesong on January 30, 2009, 03:17:41 PM
ldstlou

My intent is not to "jump you". My intent is to simply state if you feel you must speak with the family that it might be best to contact Beth. You have Jug's opinion but does he speak for Beth? I don't know that answer.

Like Anna and NJ Son's Mom indicated, if it were me, I would not be calling or emailing the family about every inch of this debate. That is my personal choice and yes, you and I differ in that regard.

Agreeing to disagree is what adults do. I did not insult or jump you.



None,

I believe the problem is those who no longer want to be here also don't want to allow us to have or voice our own opinions.  Mention Kyle and Kermit and here they come.  I don't know what LDSLou's role in this is.  I have no problem with her opinions, but she cannot seem to allow us to have a discussion about ours without bashing Kermit.


I appreciate that some posters have formed "real life" friendships and relationships over the course of this case, and I have a healthy respect and affection for really all but a few (SandraK, BonDia, etc.) of the familiar screennames that have posted here all along or post here now. 

That said, I only ever came here for Natalee so I don't have a problem calling it like I see it.

This stuff is all about people supporting an ex-monkey (whoever the "Leader" is at C&G, I guess) who is either off their meds or has run amuck on a twisted power-trip over the internet.  My suggestion would be if you actually care for this person to get them some help - away from their computer.  Feeding this person's ego can not be healthy. 

Next time anyone calls Jug or Dave or any other family member - why don't you explain to them how copying SM posts into the hidey hole and obsessing over what's going on over here is helping Natalee.

While you're at it, you can send all of our info to Aruba if it makes you feel important.  Print out all of our posts and FedEx them for all I care.  They are just using you and laughing at you behind your backs.

 ::MonkeyNoNo::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #797 1/30/09 -
Post by: 2NJSons_Mom on January 30, 2009, 03:18:33 PM
2NJ said:

Anna, are you saying those of us here do not have clear heads?   


LOL!  You got me on that one.   ::MonkeyHaHa::

I should have said additional clear heads instead of more clear heads.  Yes, I do think it would help now to have additional clear heads.  To go with those already here, that is.





 ::MonkeyWink::   I agree.  It was made in jest.  You have said often, what someone posts can be interpreted many different ways.  (you see it your way, I see it mine) This can be a good thing, new ideas and questions come forth, people can agree or disagree. 

It is also good to walk away for a little bit.....I just tried that, because being misinterpreted was affecting my response. 



Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #797 1/30/09 -
Post by: nonesuche on January 30, 2009, 03:28:37 PM
Hugs back Janet......

You are such a good proofreader, please know I meant those who continue to slam Kermit's words, life, occupation, person - certainly not those of you who have always been supportive of Kermit.

No tall europeans yet.......can't say I'm looking but may I have some of your divine shoofly  pie?

 ::MonkeyWink::

Sorry.  No can do.

By mistake ... I fed Kermit's Grandma's Shoofly Shoo Pie to my eldest son's French Canadian inlaws the other evening rather than my strawberry/rhubarb pie.  They wolfed down their first slice and ... requested seconds.

I assume that a nationality that considers frog legs cooked in a wine sauce as a delicacy will eat anything.

 ::MonkeyHaHa::

Hey ... to clarify ... I think this couple is just great ... even if I have to share my beautifuly two year old grandson with them.  I hate sharing.

  ::MonkeyWaa::

Janet

No pie?   ::MonkeyWaa::

I think now I'll have to make some cupcakes........I made Cat Cora's lasagna last night and I think it rivaled frog legs  ::MonkeyWink::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #797 1/30/09 -
Post by: Tamikosmom on January 30, 2009, 03:30:18 PM
ldstlou

My intent is not to "jump you". My intent is to simply state if you feel you must speak with the family that it might be best to contact Beth. You have Jug's opinion but does he speak for Beth? I don't know that answer.

Like Anna and NJ Son's Mom indicated, if it were me, I would not be calling or emailing the family about every inch of this debate. That is my personal choice and yes, you and I differ in that regard.

Agreeing to disagree is what adults do. I did not insult or jump you.



None,

I believe the problem is those who no longer want to be here also don't want to allow us to have or voice our own opinions.  Mention Kyle and Kermit and here they come.  I don't know what LDSLou's role in this is.  I have no problem with her opinions, but she cannot seem to allow us to have a discussion about ours without bashing Kermit.

And.Why is that? ::MonkeyConfused::

IMHO somebody at CnG is feeding her crap.  She obviously isn't answering them all herself, because it appears she's not even reading the whole message she's responding too.  Shame, because I liked her.

If she is friends with anyone at CnG that is self-explanatory to me.After Kermit posting that people are sending personal information to Aruba is dispicable to say the least.If you are going to associate yourself with such behaviour.You get NO respect from me!That's just my opinion!

KEEPTHEFAITH

THE PRODICAL SON
Luke 15:11-32 (NLT):

+++++++

Keepthefaith

I don't condone but I understand how some can be influenced.

When my eldest son was in his late teens ... it was all about friends ... friends that influenced him that his parents were controlling and ... his welling-being was not their utmost concern.  With a heavy heart ... at the age of 21 ... he was asked to leave the home.

It did not happen over night but ... over a period of time he did grow a brain ... over a period of time he did mature ... over a period of time his relationship strengthened with his famiy  and ... over a period of time he came to his senses and ... returned to the those whose prayers for this young man continued without ceasing. 

I do not understand.  However ... many Monkeys at CnG are not trolls.  From the getgo ... they have stood behind the contention that a corrupt Aruban investigation was preventing justice from prevailing.  They have stood behind a family who has been forced to ride an ongoing roller coaster from H--- ... compliments of the "powers that be" in Aruba.

Keepthefaith ... challenging the lies encompassing the current positions of these CnG members is crucial but ... the door must be kept open for them to return to the cage.  I believe with all my heart that something akin to the Prodical Son of the Scriptures ... something akin to my prodical son ... some CnG Natalee Holloway members will come to their senses.

IMO

Janet



Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #797 1/30/09 -
Post by: Keepthefaith on January 30, 2009, 03:41:34 PM
ldstlou

My intent is not to "jump you". My intent is to simply state if you feel you must speak with the family that it might be best to contact Beth. You have Jug's opinion but does he speak for Beth? I don't know that answer.

Like Anna and NJ Son's Mom indicated, if it were me, I would not be calling or emailing the family about every inch of this debate. That is my personal choice and yes, you and I differ in that regard.

Agreeing to disagree is what adults do. I did not insult or jump you.



None,

I believe the problem is those who no longer want to be here also don't want to allow us to have or voice our own opinions.  Mention Kyle and Kermit and here they come.  I don't know what LDSLou's role in this is.  I have no problem with her opinions, but she cannot seem to allow us to have a discussion about ours without bashing Kermit.

And.Why is that? ::MonkeyConfused::

IMHO somebody at CnG is feeding her crap.  She obviously isn't answering them all herself, because it appears she's not even reading the whole message she's responding too.  Shame, because I liked her.

If she is friends with anyone at CnG that is self-explanatory to me.After Kermit posting that people are sending personal information to Aruba is dispicable to say the least.If you are going to associate yourself with such behaviour.You get NO respect from me!That's just my opinion!

KEEPTHEFAITH

THE PRODICAL SON
Luke 15:11-32 (NLT):

+++++++

Keepthefaith

I don't condone but I understand how some can be influenced.

When my eldest son was in his late teens ... it was all about friends ... friends that influenced him that his parents were controlling and ... his welling-being was not their utmost concern.  With a heavy heart ... at the age of 21 ... he was asked to leave the home.

It did not happen over night but ... over a period of time he did grow a brain ... over a period of time he did mature ... over a period of time his relationship strengthened with his famiy  and ... over a period of time he came to his senses and ... returned to the those whose prayers for this young man continued without ceasing. 

I do not understand.  However ... many Monkeys at CnG are not trolls.  From the getgo ... they have stood behind the contention that a corrupt Aruban investigation was preventing justice from prevailing.  They have stood behind a family who has been forced to ride an ongoing roller coaster from H--- ... compliments of the "powers that be" in Aruba.

Keepthefaith ... challenging the lies encompassing the current positions of these CnG members is crucial but ... the door must be kept open for them to return to the cage.  I believe with all my heart that something akin to the Prodical Son of the Scriptures ... something akin to my prodical son ... some CnG Natalee Holloway members will come to their senses.

IMO

Janet



I have no problem forgiving,as well as welcoming people back.To stand by people that are disseminating ones personal information to Aruba is reprehensible! ::MonkeyNoNo::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #797 1/30/09 -
Post by: sharon on January 30, 2009, 03:42:13 PM
ldstlou

My intent is not to "jump you". My intent is to simply state if you feel you must speak with the family that it might be best to contact Beth. You have Jug's opinion but does he speak for Beth? I don't know that answer.

Like Anna and NJ Son's Mom indicated, if it were me, I would not be calling or emailing the family about every inch of this debate. That is my personal choice and yes, you and I differ in that regard.

Agreeing to disagree is what adults do. I did not insult or jump you.



Hiya!

I strongly 'caution' you.

I had the nerve to ask that question originally, from the same person actually -- and let's just say the 'meltdown' was not pretty. And reinforcements even arrived  ::MonkeyCool::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #797 1/30/09 -
Post by: Lifesong on January 30, 2009, 03:44:01 PM

THE PRODICAL SON
Luke 15:11-32 (NLT):

+++++++

Keepthefaith

I don't condone but I understand how some can be influenced.

When my eldest son was in his late teens ... it was all about friends ... friends that influenced him that his parents were controlling and ... his welling-being was not their utmost concern.  With a heavy heart ... at the age of 21 ... he was asked to leave the home.

It did not happen over night but ... over a period of time he did grow a brain ... over a period of time he did mature ... over a period of time his relationship strengthened with his famiy  and ... over a period of time he came to his senses and ... returned to the those whose prayers for this young man continued without ceasing. 

I do not understand.  However ... many Monkeys at CnG are not trolls.  From the getgo ... they have stood behind the contention that a corrupt Aruban investigation was preventing justice from prevailing.  They have stood behind a family who has been forced to ride an ongoing roller coaster from H--- ... compliments of the "powers that be" in Aruba.

Keepthefaith ... challenging the lies encompassing the current positions of these CnG members is crucial but ... the door must be kept open for them to return to the cage.  I believe with all my heart that something akin to the Prodical Son of the Scriptures ... something akin to my prodical son ... some CnG Natalee Holloway members will come to their senses.

IMO

Janet



Thank you for that, Janet.

I must say, I learn a little something from you everyday.

 ::MonkeyCool::

To those many monkeys at CnG that Janet is referring to above who are not trolls, I apologize if I have offended you.

Patience is surely one thing that NH monkeys have learned to have in abundance.  I'll be relying on mine going forward.



Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #797 1/30/09 -
Post by: sharon on January 30, 2009, 03:47:07 PM

I find it very telling that they stayed for 4 months and the only human dive was the one done on the cage, which Silvetti & Trehan claim contained nothing.





I have not heard of any action by Beth or Dave (or Jug) to 'fund' the dives for the remaining 100+ 'viable' targets.

I also find that odd.

And I asked this before - but I'll ask again -- how EXACTLY did CAPS know where to dive to find the cage????

In other words -- who gave him the coordinates of the location?? Or was he swimming around in 90' of ocean water and stumbled upon it??

Inquiring minds want to know.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #797 1/30/09 -
Post by: Lifesong on January 30, 2009, 03:48:08 PM


To any that are trolls, I don't apologize at all!   ::MonkeyWink::

 ::MonkeyTongue::   ::MonkeyHaHa::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #797 1/30/09 -
Post by: Tamikosmom on January 30, 2009, 03:56:07 PM
ldstlou

My intent is not to "jump you". My intent is to simply state if you feel you must speak with the family that it might be best to contact Beth. You have Jug's opinion but does he speak for Beth? I don't know that answer.

Like Anna and NJ Son's Mom indicated, if it were me, I would not be calling or emailing the family about every inch of this debate. That is my personal choice and yes, you and I differ in that regard.

Agreeing to disagree is what adults do. I did not insult or jump you.



None,

I believe the problem is those who no longer want to be here also don't want to allow us to have or voice our own opinions.  Mention Kyle and Kermit and here they come.  I don't know what LDSLou's role in this is.  I have no problem with her opinions, but she cannot seem to allow us to have a discussion about ours without bashing Kermit.

And.Why is that? ::MonkeyConfused::

IMHO somebody at CnG is feeding her crap.  She obviously isn't answering them all herself, because it appears she's not even reading the whole message she's responding too.  Shame, because I liked her.

If she is friends with anyone at CnG that is self-explanatory to me.After Kermit posting that people are sending personal information to Aruba is dispicable to say the least.If you are going to associate yourself with such behaviour.You get NO respect from me!That's just my opinion!

KEEPTHEFAITH

THE PRODICAL SON
Luke 15:11-32 (NLT):

+++++++

Keepthefaith

I don't condone but I understand how some can be influenced.

When my eldest son was in his late teens ... it was all about friends ... friends that influenced him that his parents were controlling and ... his welling-being was not their utmost concern.  With a heavy heart ... at the age of 21 ... he was asked to leave the home.

It did not happen over night but ... over a period of time he did grow a brain ... over a period of time he did mature ... over a period of time his relationship strengthened with his famiy  and ... over a period of time he came to his senses and ... returned to the those whose prayers for this young man continued without ceasing. 

I do not understand.  However ... many Monkeys at CnG are not trolls.  From the getgo ... they have stood behind the contention that a corrupt Aruban investigation was preventing justice from prevailing.  They have stood behind a family who has been forced to ride an ongoing roller coaster from H--- ... compliments of the "powers that be" in Aruba.

Keepthefaith ... challenging the lies encompassing the current positions of these CnG members is crucial but ... the door must be kept open for them to return to the cage.  I believe with all my heart that something akin to the Prodical Son of the Scriptures ... something akin to my prodical son ... some CnG Natalee Holloway members will come to their senses.

IMO

Janet



I have no problem forgiving,as well as welcoming people back.To stand by people that are disseminating ones personal information to Aruba is reprehensible! ::MonkeyNoNo::

I agree and ... I believe that the words of those posts must be challenged.

I attempt ... but often fail ... to separate the words of posts which I might disagree with ... with those who post.  Considering that many CnG posters are part of the Monkey family ... stay focused on condemning the content ... not posters.  This leaves the door open for their return to the cage.

However ... trolls are open season.  They never were part of the Monkey family.  From the getgo ... they have attempted to distract from the truth encompassing the morning of May 30, 2005.

 ::MonkeyHaHa::

Janet




Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #797 1/30/09 -
Post by: Tamikosmom on January 30, 2009, 04:00:11 PM
Mods ... Klaas

I began stuttering when I came to the end of my last post.

 ::MonkeyHaHa::

Please edit accordingly.

Thanks

Janet


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #797 1/30/09 -
Post by: Lifesong on January 30, 2009, 04:02:25 PM

I find it very telling that they stayed for 4 months and the only human dive was the one done on the cage, which Silvetti & Trehan claim contained nothing.


I have not heard of any action by Beth or Dave (or Jug) to 'fund' the dives for the remaining 100+ 'viable' targets.

I also find that odd.

And I asked this before - but I'll ask again -- how EXACTLY did CAPS know where to dive to find the cage????

In other words -- who gave him the coordinates of the location?? Or was he swimming around in 90' of ocean water and stumbled upon it??

Inquiring minds want to know.


CapsLockWizard
"Another thing , I went to dive a week a go to the same location, and the Cage is still there. If the cage was evidance in a murder case, why is it still in the water."

http://scaredmonkeys.net/index.php?topic=4182.msg564838#msg564838

Of course, this is same post in which Caps said: "on the opening a business in Aruba... no way true. Need an Arubian Partner and the Business law for AVV or ofshore business registered in Aruba is not benefecial." 

And didn't I just see information and links posted in the last day or two that proved that to be untrue?  Is it possible he doesn't dive at all and was just making it up?  Of course, it's possible...
 :smt102



Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #797 1/30/09 -
Post by: Keepthefaith on January 30, 2009, 04:07:34 PM
ldstlou

My intent is not to "jump you". My intent is to simply state if you feel you must speak with the family that it might be best to contact Beth. You have Jug's opinion but does he speak for Beth? I don't know that answer.

Like Anna and NJ Son's Mom indicated, if it were me, I would not be calling or emailing the family about every inch of this debate. That is my personal choice and yes, you and I differ in that regard.

Agreeing to disagree is what adults do. I did not insult or jump you.



None,

I believe the problem is those who no longer want to be here also don't want to allow us to have or voice our own opinions.  Mention Kyle and Kermit and here they come.  I don't know what LDSLou's role in this is.  I have no problem with her opinions, but she cannot seem to allow us to have a discussion about ours without bashing Kermit.

And.Why is that? ::MonkeyConfused::

IMHO somebody at CnG is feeding her crap.  She obviously isn't answering them all herself, because it appears she's not even reading the whole message she's responding too.  Shame, because I liked her.

If she is friends with anyone at CnG that is self-explanatory to me.After Kermit posting that people are sending personal information to Aruba is dispicable to say the least.If you are going to associate yourself with such behaviour.You get NO respect from me!That's just my opinion!

KEEPTHEFAITH

THE PRODICAL SON
Luke 15:11-32 (NLT):

+++++++

Keepthefaith

I don't condone but I understand how some can be influenced.

When my eldest son was in his late teens ... it was all about friends ... friends that influenced him that his parents were controlling and ... his welling-being was not their utmost concern.  With a heavy heart ... at the age of 21 ... he was asked to leave the home.

It did not happen over night but ... over a period of time he did grow a brain ... over a period of time he did mature ... over a period of time his relationship strengthened with his famiy  and ... over a period of time he came to his senses and ... returned to the those whose prayers for this young man continued without ceasing. 

I do not understand.  However ... many Monkeys at CnG are not trolls.  From the getgo ... they have stood behind the contention that a corrupt Aruban investigation was preventing justice from prevailing.  They have stood behind a family who has been forced to ride an ongoing roller coaster from H--- ... compliments of the "powers that be" in Aruba.

Keepthefaith ... challenging the lies encompassing the current positions of these CnG members is crucial but ... the door must be kept open for them to return to the cage.  I believe with all my heart that something akin to the Prodical Son of the Scriptures ... something akin to my prodical son ... some CnG Natalee Holloway members will come to their senses.

IMO

Janet



I have no problem forgiving,as well as welcoming people back.To stand by people that are disseminating ones personal information to Aruba is reprehensible! ::MonkeyNoNo::

I agree and ... I believe that the words of those posts must be challenged.

I attempt ... but often fail ... to separate the words of posts which I might disagree with ... with those who post.  Considering that many CnG posters are part of the Monkey family ... stay focused on condemning the content ... not posters.  This leaves the door open for their return to the cage.

However ... trolls are open season.  They never were part of the Monkey family.  From the getgo ... they have attempted to distract from the truth encompassing the morning of May 30, 2005.

 ::MonkeyHaHa::

Janet




From the posts of former CnG member's.If your not toeing the party line your poofed!So how are you a memeber and not toeing the party line. ::MonkeyConfused::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #797 1/30/09 -
Post by: Keepthefaith on January 30, 2009, 04:09:02 PM

I find it very telling that they stayed for 4 months and the only human dive was the one done on the cage, which Silvetti & Trehan claim contained nothing.


I have not heard of any action by Beth or Dave (or Jug) to 'fund' the dives for the remaining 100+ 'viable' targets.

I also find that odd.

And I asked this before - but I'll ask again -- how EXACTLY did CAPS know where to dive to find the cage????

In other words -- who gave him the coordinates of the location?? Or was he swimming around in 90' of ocean water and stumbled upon it??

Inquiring minds want to know.


CapsLockWizard
"Another thing , I went to dive a week a go to the same location, and the Cage is still there. If the cage was evidance in a murder case, why is it still in the water."

http://scaredmonkeys.net/index.php?topic=4182.msg564838#msg564838

Of course, this is same post in which Caps said: "on the opening a business in Aruba... no way true. Need an Arubian Partner and the Business law for AVV or ofshore business registered in Aruba is not benefecial." 

And didn't I just see information and links posted in the last day or two that proved that to be untrue?  Is it possible he doesn't dive at all and was just making it up?  Of course, it's possible...
 :smt102



Me personally.I don't trust CapsLockWizard.Prove me wrong.Until then.I stand firm! ::MonkeyCool::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #797 1/30/09 -
Post by: sharon on January 30, 2009, 04:12:05 PM

I find it very telling that they stayed for 4 months and the only human dive was the one done on the cage, which Silvetti & Trehan claim contained nothing.


I have not heard of any action by Beth or Dave (or Jug) to 'fund' the dives for the remaining 100+ 'viable' targets.

I also find that odd.

And I asked this before - but I'll ask again -- how EXACTLY did CAPS know where to dive to find the cage????

In other words -- who gave him the coordinates of the location?? Or was he swimming around in 90' of ocean water and stumbled upon it??

Inquiring minds want to know.


CapsLockWizard
"Another thing , I went to dive a week a go to the same location, and the Cage is still there. If the cage was evidance in a murder case, why is it still in the water."

http://scaredmonkeys.net/index.php?topic=4182.msg564838#msg564838

Of course, this is same post in which Caps said: "on the opening a business in Aruba... no way true. Need an Arubian Partner and the Business law for AVV or ofshore business registered in Aruba is not benefecial." 

And didn't I just see information and links posted in the last day or two that proved that to be untrue?  Is it possible he doesn't dive at all and was just making it up?  Of course, it's possible...
 :smt102



But, if he did really dive --  a boat would have had to take him out to the dive location. It was not right off shore.

How did the boat know where to go??

That's sort of a 'needle in the haystack' analogy. Someone HAD to have given CAPS or the Boat driver the location of the cage. WHO WOULD KNOW THAT other than the crew of the Persistence or ALE

Am I the only one that finds that hinky??

Don't worry -- I'm used to hearing 'yes'  ::MonkeyLaugh::
.



Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #797 1/30/09 -
Post by: Lifesong on January 30, 2009, 04:16:49 PM

KTF - I agree with you.



Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #797 1/30/09 -
Post by: jen3560 on January 30, 2009, 04:20:09 PM


But, if he did really dive --  a boat would have had to take him out to the dive location. It was not right off shore.

How did the boat know where to go??

That's sort of a 'needle in the haystack' analogy. Someone HAD to have given CAPS or the Boat driver the location of the cage. WHO WOULD KNOW THAT other than the crew of the Persistence or ALE

Am I the only one that finds that hinky??

Don't worry -- I'm used to hearing 'yes'  ::MonkeyLaugh::
.



Yes.







Just kidding dear!!!!!  ::MonkeyTongue::

that is most definitely hinky. Especially after we were told that all target locations were kept in a "safe, locked location, only known by two people"


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #797 1/30/09 -
Post by: Lifesong on January 30, 2009, 04:22:44 PM

I find it very telling that they stayed for 4 months and the only human dive was the one done on the cage, which Silvetti & Trehan claim contained nothing.


I have not heard of any action by Beth or Dave (or Jug) to 'fund' the dives for the remaining 100+ 'viable' targets.

I also find that odd.

And I asked this before - but I'll ask again -- how EXACTLY did CAPS know where to dive to find the cage????

In other words -- who gave him the coordinates of the location?? Or was he swimming around in 90' of ocean water and stumbled upon it??

Inquiring minds want to know.


CapsLockWizard
"Another thing , I went to dive a week a go to the same location, and the Cage is still there. If the cage was evidance in a murder case, why is it still in the water."

http://scaredmonkeys.net/index.php?topic=4182.msg564838#msg564838

Of course, this is same post in which Caps said: "on the opening a business in Aruba... no way true. Need an Arubian Partner and the Business law for AVV or ofshore business registered in Aruba is not benefecial." 

And didn't I just see information and links posted in the last day or two that proved that to be untrue?  Is it possible he doesn't dive at all and was just making it up?  Of course, it's possible...
 :smt102


But, if he did really dive --  a boat would have had to take him out to the dive location. It was not right off shore.

How did the boat know where to go??

That's sort of a 'needle in the haystack' analogy. Someone HAD to have given CAPS or the Boat driver the location of the cage. WHO WOULD KNOW THAT other than the crew of the Persistence or ALE

Am I the only one that finds that hinky??

Don't worry -- I'm used to hearing 'yes'  ::MonkeyLaugh::
.

I think it would be hinky if we didn't already know/believe that Caps is associated with ALE/AHATA.  Was Clyde Burke driving the boat? ::MonkeyEek::


Word of the Day:  Hinky
 ::MonkeyWink:: ::MonkeyHaHa::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #797 1/30/09 -
Post by: Keepthefaith on January 30, 2009, 04:24:24 PM

I find it very telling that they stayed for 4 months and the only human dive was the one done on the cage, which Silvetti & Trehan claim contained nothing.


I have not heard of any action by Beth or Dave (or Jug) to 'fund' the dives for the remaining 100+ 'viable' targets.

I also find that odd.

And I asked this before - but I'll ask again -- how EXACTLY did CAPS know where to dive to find the cage????

In other words -- who gave him the coordinates of the location?? Or was he swimming around in 90' of ocean water and stumbled upon it??

Inquiring minds want to know.


CapsLockWizard
"Another thing , I went to dive a week a go to the same location, and the Cage is still there. If the cage was evidance in a murder case, why is it still in the water."

http://scaredmonkeys.net/index.php?topic=4182.msg564838#msg564838

Of course, this is same post in which Caps said: "on the opening a business in Aruba... no way true. Need an Arubian Partner and the Business law for AVV or ofshore business registered in Aruba is not benefecial." 

And didn't I just see information and links posted in the last day or two that proved that to be untrue?  Is it possible he doesn't dive at all and was just making it up?  Of course, it's possible...
 :smt102


But, if he did really dive --  a boat would have had to take him out to the dive location. It was not right off shore.

How did the boat know where to go??

That's sort of a 'needle in the haystack' analogy. Someone HAD to have given CAPS or the Boat driver the location of the cage. WHO WOULD KNOW THAT other than the crew of the Persistence or ALE

Am I the only one that finds that hinky??

Don't worry -- I'm used to hearing 'yes'  ::MonkeyLaugh::
.

I think it would be hinky if we didn't already know/believe that Caps is associated with ALE/AHATA.  Was Clyde Burke driving the boat? ::MonkeyEek::


Word of the Day:  Hinky
 ::MonkeyWink:: ::MonkeyHaHa::

You may be on to something Lifesong! ::MonkeyWink::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #797 1/30/09 -
Post by: sharon on January 30, 2009, 04:24:46 PM
oh, how i miss you

 ::MonkeyLaugh:: ::MonkeyLaugh:: ::MonkeyLaugh::

What would CAPS gain by saying it, if not true? All he was saying was that the cage was still there. To disprove there is any interest in it.

He basically admitted that ?someone? 'inside' gave him the cage location  ::MonkeyConfused::

Safe keeping my monkey hiney  ::MonkeyLaugh::

{{{hugs}}}



Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #797 1/30/09 -
Post by: Magnolia on January 30, 2009, 04:25:44 PM
I think that Kyle posted something about an underwater vacuum
that could be taken to the cage and possible DNA retrieved from
the site.
I have wondered if Caps went there (if he actually did) to make
sure that there was nothing to vacuum up.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #797 1/30/09 -
Post by: Tamikosmom on January 30, 2009, 04:32:59 PM

I find it very telling that they stayed for 4 months and the only human dive was the one done on the cage, which Silvetti & Trehan claim contained nothing.


I have not heard of any action by Beth or Dave (or Jug) to 'fund' the dives for the remaining 100+ 'viable' targets.

I also find that odd.

And I asked this before - but I'll ask again -- how EXACTLY did CAPS know where to dive to find the cage????

In other words -- who gave him the coordinates of the location?? Or was he swimming around in 90' of ocean water and stumbled upon it??

Inquiring minds want to know.


CapsLockWizard
"Another thing , I went to dive a week a go to the same location, and the Cage is still there. If the cage was evidance in a murder case, why is it still in the water."

http://scaredmonkeys.net/index.php?topic=4182.msg564838#msg564838

Of course, this is same post in which Caps said: "on the opening a business in Aruba... no way true. Need an Arubian Partner and the Business law for AVV or ofshore business registered in Aruba is not benefecial." 

And didn't I just see information and links posted in the last day or two that proved that to be untrue?  Is it possible he doesn't dive at all and was just making it up?  Of course, it's possible...
 :smt102



CAPS does not get it or ... maybe he does.

The cage/trap and its contents was disregarded by the "powers that be" in Aruba as not case related.  However ... if CAPS is to be believed ... the "nothing but plastic bags" that John Silvetti claimed was in the trap/cage was sampled and recovered.

I can only assume that Kyle Kingman (ROV Image Analyst), Tim Trahan (American Diver) and Louis Shaefer (ROV Copyright) are attempting to make deals with major networks for the sale of ROV images that reveal a cage/trap containing "nothing but plastic bags".

GMAB!

Sooooo ... CAPS is a diver.  Innnnteeeeresting.

Janet

++++++

CAPS - IN HIS OWN WORDS

CAPS:
  John state the cage was empty. it was full of these broken plastic bags that shows on the cam like skull, but he said to me it is the water doing tricks when picture was taken. He thinks also it is a postoffice.


KYLE KINGMAN (ROV IMAGE ANALYST) - IN HIS OWN WORDS

Kyle:
I took the proportions of the body form from the head, to shoulder, to a 90 degree angle which I believed to be the hem line of Natalee's skirt. I then took those proportions and matched them to the photo of Natalee with what she was last seen wearing. The proportions matched within an inch from head, to shoulder, to skirt line. Based on this comparison and with what we believed we saw in the Dec 29th video, Tim Miller contacted the family and told them the 99.9% comment. I told Tim not to do anything until we have forensic results back after the site is processed. Jan 7th we sampled the contents and in my opinion we found the skirt under the sand along with the other items The blue fabric was found right where the skirt is pictured. If it isn't her, it will forever haunt me as a major cosmic WTF.

Kyle:  The most likely to remain at or near it's original location was the skull, which is why I was so convinced the object pictured was a skull.

Kyle:   John is not a believer in the trap. He took ALE's word as gospel that it wasn't case related, yet never studied the videos or bothered to inquire further. He had plans on doing business with Aruba and in S. America and he didn't want to hurt any feelings by talks hinting at lack of complete trust and friendship.

Kyle: On the other hand, those differences has also caused a rift between Tim Trahan/Louis and myself with John (although John and I remain close friends and colleagues). The result is Tim, Louis and I are moving forward and John is left out of the loop.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #797 1/30/09 -
Post by: Tamikosmom on January 30, 2009, 04:34:42 PM
Mods ... Klaas

It is me again ... Tamikosmom.

The pink highlight in my last post should have been red.

For clarity ... please edit.

I apologize.

Janet

Done.    ::MonkeyHaHa::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #797 1/30/09 -
Post by: Keepthefaith on January 30, 2009, 04:35:26 PM
Jen.How many offices did GeoLab have before the Persistence search in Aruba and after??Just curious.If you know.TIA


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #797 1/30/09 -
Post by: Tamikosmom on January 30, 2009, 04:38:27 PM
ldstlou

My intent is not to "jump you". My intent is to simply state if you feel you must speak with the family that it might be best to contact Beth. You have Jug's opinion but does he speak for Beth? I don't know that answer.

Like Anna and NJ Son's Mom indicated, if it were me, I would not be calling or emailing the family about every inch of this debate. That is my personal choice and yes, you and I differ in that regard.

Agreeing to disagree is what adults do. I did not insult or jump you.



None,

I believe the problem is those who no longer want to be here also don't want to allow us to have or voice our own opinions.  Mention Kyle and Kermit and here they come.  I don't know what LDSLou's role in this is.  I have no problem with her opinions, but she cannot seem to allow us to have a discussion about ours without bashing Kermit.

And.Why is that? ::MonkeyConfused::

IMHO somebody at CnG is feeding her crap.  She obviously isn't answering them all herself, because it appears she's not even reading the whole message she's responding too.  Shame, because I liked her.

If she is friends with anyone at CnG that is self-explanatory to me.After Kermit posting that people are sending personal information to Aruba is dispicable to say the least.If you are going to associate yourself with such behaviour.You get NO respect from me!That's just my opinion!

KEEPTHEFAITH

THE PRODICAL SON
Luke 15:11-32 (NLT):

+++++++

Keepthefaith

I don't condone but I understand how some can be influenced.

When my eldest son was in his late teens ... it was all about friends ... friends that influenced him that his parents were controlling and ... his welling-being was not their utmost concern.  With a heavy heart ... at the age of 21 ... he was asked to leave the home.

It did not happen over night but ... over a period of time he did grow a brain ... over a period of time he did mature ... over a period of time his relationship strengthened with his famiy  and ... over a period of time he came to his senses and ... returned to the those whose prayers for this young man continued without ceasing. 

I do not understand.  However ... many Monkeys at CnG are not trolls.  From the getgo ... they have stood behind the contention that a corrupt Aruban investigation was preventing justice from prevailing.  They have stood behind a family who has been forced to ride an ongoing roller coaster from H--- ... compliments of the "powers that be" in Aruba.

Keepthefaith ... challenging the lies encompassing the current positions of these CnG members is crucial but ... the door must be kept open for them to return to the cage.  I believe with all my heart that something akin to the Prodical Son of the Scriptures ... something akin to my prodical son ... some CnG Natalee Holloway members will come to their senses.

IMO

Janet



I have no problem forgiving,as well as welcoming people back.To stand by people that are disseminating ones personal information to Aruba is reprehensible! ::MonkeyNoNo::

I agree and ... I believe that the words of those posts must be challenged.

I attempt ... but often fail ... to separate the words of posts which I might disagree with ... with those who post.  Considering that many CnG posters are part of the Monkey family ... stay focused on condemning the content ... not posters.  This leaves the door open for their return to the cage.

However ... trolls are open season.  They never were part of the Monkey family.  From the getgo ... they have attempted to distract from the truth encompassing the morning of May 30, 2005.

 ::MonkeyHaHa::

Janet


From the posts of former CnG member's.If your not toeing the party line your poofed!So how are you a memeber and not toeing the party line. ::MonkeyConfused::

Something akin to a cult.  Brainwashing ... comformity and ... adherence.  Then there is the social aspect ... the need to be accepted ... to belong.

The influences are strong.

 ::MonkeyWaa::

Janet


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #797 1/30/09 -
Post by: jen3560 on January 30, 2009, 04:39:36 PM


I think it would be hinky if we didn't already know/believe that Caps is associated with ALE/AHATA.  Was Clyde Burke driving the boat? ::MonkeyEek::


Word of the Day:  Hinky
 ::MonkeyWink:: ::MonkeyHaHa::

 ::MonkeyEek:: ::MonkeyEek::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #797 1/30/09 -
Post by: jen3560 on January 30, 2009, 04:40:52 PM
oh, how i miss you

 ::MonkeyLaugh:: ::MonkeyLaugh:: ::MonkeyLaugh::

What would CAPS gain by saying it, if not true? All he was saying was that the cage was still there. To disprove there is any interest in it.

He basically admitted that ?someone? 'inside' gave him the cage location  ::MonkeyConfused::

Safe keeping my monkey hiney  ::MonkeyLaugh::

{{{hugs}}}



BINGO!!!


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #797 1/30/09 -
Post by: sharon on January 30, 2009, 04:41:38 PM
I think that Kyle posted something about an underwater vacuum
that could be taken to the cage and possible DNA retrieved from
the site.
I have wondered if Caps went there (if he actually did) to make
sure that there was nothing to vacuum up.

That's a possibility Magnolia. I thought it odd that there were no 'photos' accompanying the post.

I'm not a diver, but I know that inexperienced divers do not go down 90'. On a whim. I don't recall seeing CAPS ever discussing that he was an experienced diver. But it's possible.

Yes Lifesong -- I've read all the posts about CAPS and the ALE connections. This innocuous little post however, confirmed it for me. :-(  Again, right from CAPS himself.

So, do we assume that the 100+ 'viable target' locations are no longer in safe keeping either?

Yes -- sometimes I like to state the obvious. For me, it reinforces the level of lieing and corruption and coverup.

JUSTICE FOR NATALEE


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #797 1/30/09 -
Post by: 2NJSons_Mom on January 30, 2009, 04:43:05 PM
oh, how i miss you

 ::MonkeyLaugh:: ::MonkeyLaugh:: ::MonkeyLaugh::

What would CAPS gain by saying it, if not true? All he was saying was that the cage was still there. To disprove there is any interest in it.

He basically admitted that ?someone? 'inside' gave him the cage location  ::MonkeyConfused::

Safe keeping my monkey hiney  ::MonkeyLaugh::

{{{hugs}}}



BINGO!!!

This makes me feel my mind is clearer (more clear) than I thought, having posted about this last thread.  Phew...


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #797 1/30/09 -
Post by: Tamikosmom on January 30, 2009, 04:44:35 PM

I find it very telling that they stayed for 4 months and the only human dive was the one done on the cage, which Silvetti & Trehan claim contained nothing.


I have not heard of any action by Beth or Dave (or Jug) to 'fund' the dives for the remaining 100+ 'viable' targets.

I also find that odd.

And I asked this before - but I'll ask again -- how EXACTLY did CAPS know where to dive to find the cage????

In other words -- who gave him the coordinates of the location?? Or was he swimming around in 90' of ocean water and stumbled upon it??

Inquiring minds want to know.


CapsLockWizard
"Another thing , I went to dive a week a go to the same location, and the Cage is still there. If the cage was evidance in a murder case, why is it still in the water."

http://scaredmonkeys.net/index.php?topic=4182.msg564838#msg564838

Of course, this is same post in which Caps said: "on the opening a business in Aruba... no way true. Need an Arubian Partner and the Business law for AVV or ofshore business registered in Aruba is not benefecial." 

And didn't I just see information and links posted in the last day or two that proved that to be untrue?  Is it possible he doesn't dive at all and was just making it up?  Of course, it's possible...
 :smt102


But, if he did really dive --  a boat would have had to take him out to the dive location. It was not right off shore.

How did the boat know where to go??

That's sort of a 'needle in the haystack' analogy. Someone HAD to have given CAPS or the Boat driver the location of the cage. WHO WOULD KNOW THAT other than the crew of the Persistence or ALE

Am I the only one that finds that hinky??

Don't worry -- I'm used to hearing 'yes'  ::MonkeyLaugh::
.

I think it would be hinky if we didn't already know/believe that Caps is associated with ALE/AHATA.  Was Clyde Burke driving the boat? ::MonkeyEek::


Word of the Day:  Hinky
 ::MonkeyWink:: ::MonkeyHaHa::


HINKY!!  I do believe that I am about to adopt that word as my own.  It could be used in so often when the right word does not come to mind.

 ::MonkeyHaHa::

Clyde Burke!!!

 ::MonkeyShocked::

Janet



Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #797 1/30/09 -
Post by: Tamikosmom on January 30, 2009, 04:47:27 PM
I am feeling a little "hinky" right now ... so I will bid you all adieu.

Later, Janet



Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #797 1/30/09 -
Post by: sharon on January 30, 2009, 04:49:08 PM
oh, how i miss you

 ::MonkeyLaugh:: ::MonkeyLaugh:: ::MonkeyLaugh::

What would CAPS gain by saying it, if not true? All he was saying was that the cage was still there. To disprove there is any interest in it.

He basically admitted that ?someone? 'inside' gave him the cage location  ::MonkeyConfused::

Safe keeping my monkey hiney  ::MonkeyLaugh::

{{{hugs}}}



BINGO!!!

This makes me feel my mind is clearer (more clear) than I thought, having posted about this last thread.  Phew...

Me, too!!

And I think I did yesterday, too  ::MonkeyLaugh::

And probably a few weeks ago as well  ::MonkeyTongue::

It was such a 'connect the dot' DUH moment for me.  ::MonkeyWink::

I just needed to share.



Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #797 1/30/09 -
Post by: nonesuche on January 30, 2009, 04:50:09 PM
Hi Sharon-

Thanks for the warning, I feel sure there will be some payback in store for my daring to ask, there always is a measure of drama attached.

This is what I feel is the most strategic statement that Kyle made, of course I didn't see him post or email this direct to me - so the source always matters too.

That aside it's this passage:
Kyle:   John is not a believer in the trap. He took ALE's word as gospel that it wasn't case related, yet never studied the videos or bothered to inquire further. He had plans on doing business with Aruba and in S. America and he didn't want to hurt any feelings by talks hinting at lack of complete trust and friendship.

I'm accustomed to seeing this all the time, even within boards of non-profits I've served on, there are few if any true philanthropic 'gifts' without a larger purpose or payback. I suspect Jug is pretty accustomed to seeing this too.

At the time we first heard about the Persistence's voyage it boggled my mind how such an expensive operation could even be covered from donations from individuals - unless multi-millionaires and billionaires contributed.

I remain convinced this was the true purpose throughout. Oil is liquid gold and the Russian oligarch's who rose up within oil and gas have migrated to South America and the Carribbean as well - it's the next new frontier for their gold.




Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #797 1/30/09 -
Post by: KYcat on January 30, 2009, 04:51:27 PM
quote>
KTF

From the posts of former CnG member's.If your not toeing the party line your poofed!So how are you a memeber and not toeing the party line.

quote>

EVIDENTLY YOU CANNOT BE A PART OF CnG IF YOU DON'T AGREE WITH THEIR VIEWS/AGENDA.  SO HOW CAN SOMEONE JUSTIFY BEING A MEMBER AT CnG AND AT SM?  THAT IS A CONTRADICTION IN ITSELF.  I CALL IT TWO-FACED.

THAT IS HOW I SEE IT.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #797 1/30/09 -
Post by: KYcat on January 30, 2009, 04:54:55 PM
My previous post is not a drive-by.  I am at work and trying to read here also.  I will check back later to see how badly I will get slammed for that post.
 


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #797 1/30/09 -
Post by: jen3560 on January 30, 2009, 04:55:23 PM
KTF - I never did look at the dates versus the different companies, other than to ascertain there were Dutch connections/customers prior to November 2007.  So I'm sorry, I don't have an answer for you.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #797 1/30/09 -
Post by: sharon on January 30, 2009, 04:55:54 PM
Hi Sharon-

Thanks for the warning, I feel sure there will be some payback in store for my daring to ask, there always is a measure of drama attached.

This is what I feel is the most strategic statement that Kyle made, of course I didn't see him post or email this direct to me - so the source always matters too.

That aside it's this passage:
Kyle:   John is not a believer in the trap. He took ALE's word as gospel that it wasn't case related, yet never studied the videos or bothered to inquire further. He had plans on doing business with Aruba and in S. America and he didn't want to hurt any feelings by talks hinting at lack of complete trust and friendship.

I'm accustomed to seeing this all the time, even within boards of non-profits I've served on, there are few if any true philanthropic 'gifts' without a larger purpose or payback. I suspect Jug is pretty accustomed to seeing this too.

At the time we first heard about the Persistence's voyage it boggled my mind how such an expensive operation could even be covered from donations from individuals - unless multi-millionaires and billionaires contributed.

I remain convinced this was the true purpose throughout. Oil is liquid gold and the Russian oligarch's who rose up within oil and gas have migrated to South America and the Carribbean as well - it's the next new frontier for their gold.





Sadly, I DID see him post this. :-(

Those are Kyle's words.


I hope all -- personal and crazy business world stuff -- is treating you well.






Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #797 1/30/09 -
Post by: Keepthefaith on January 30, 2009, 04:58:32 PM
Hi Sharon-

Thanks for the warning, I feel sure there will be some payback in store for my daring to ask, there always is a measure of drama attached.

This is what I feel is the most strategic statement that Kyle made, of course I didn't see him post or email this direct to me - so the source always matters too.

That aside it's this passage:
Kyle:   John is not a believer in the trap. He took ALE's word as gospel that it wasn't case related, yet never studied the videos or bothered to inquire further. He had plans on doing business with Aruba and in S. America and he didn't want to hurt any feelings by talks hinting at lack of complete trust and friendship.

I'm accustomed to seeing this all the time, even within boards of non-profits I've served on, there are few if any true philanthropic 'gifts' without a larger purpose or payback. I suspect Jug is pretty accustomed to seeing this too.

At the time we first heard about the Persistence's voyage it boggled my mind how such an expensive operation could even be covered from donations from individuals - unless multi-millionaires and billionaires contributed.

I remain convinced this was the true purpose throughout. Oil is liquid gold and the Russian oligarch's who rose up within oil and gas have migrated to South America and the Carribbean as well - it's the next new frontier for their gold.




Great post None!The question now is who,or what contract got The Persistence down to Aruba?Follow the money.The evidence has to be somewhere..Just thoughts.They had to take the some donations or else that would prove the OIL point to begin with unless they were funding it all by themselves which throws up an BIG red flag when one's sole occupation is OIL!To whom were The Persistence really trying to keep this a secret from?

KEEPTHEFAITH



Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #797 1/30/09 -
Post by: nonesuche on January 30, 2009, 05:00:47 PM
Hi Sharon-

You have probably had to confirm that many times, I fear I'm just not able to read through all I miss due to work everyday. Yes it is sad.

Work? Honestly it's a dogfight everyday lately, the squeeze from this economy brings out the worst in many. I do hope yours is going well and better than mine  ::MonkeyWink::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #797 1/30/09 -
Post by: Tamikosmom on January 30, 2009, 05:07:25 PM
quote>
KTF

From the posts of former CnG member's.If your not toeing the party line your poofed!So how are you a memeber and not toeing the party line.

quote>

EVIDENTLY YOU CANNOT BE A PART OF CnG IF YOU DON'T AGREE WITH THEIR VIEWS/AGENDA.  SO HOW CAN SOMEONE JUSTIFY BEING A MEMBER AT CnG AND AT SM?  THAT IS A CONTRADICTION IN ITSELF.  I CALL IT TWO-FACED.

THAT IS HOW I SEE IT.


KYcat ... Unlike a cult which attempts to prevent the infiltration of outside influences ... the administrator/s of CnG cannot prevent its members from reading the SM site if that is their  choice.  This I believe will be the catalyst which will cause some members to "come to their senses" and ... realize that they are being partipants in the coverup of John Silvetti's assistance to the finale' of the great Aruban coverup ... participants in the coverup of John Silvetti's betrayal to the family of Natalee Holloway.

This is the reason that I continually post my REMINDERS ... REMINDERS of Kyle Kingman's own words ... Kyle Kingman who held the professional position of ROV Image Analyst aboard the Persistence.

Janet

+++++

[/quote]

Something akin to a cult.  Brainwashing ... comformity and ... adherence.  Then there is the social aspect ... the need to be accepted ... to be loved ... to belong.
The influences are strong.

 ::MonkeyWaa::

Janet

[/quote]


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #797 1/30/09 -
Post by: nonesuche on January 30, 2009, 05:12:14 PM
keepthefaith-

I believe I noticed bleachedblack mention Abramovich recently? He has connections with Aruba and he's one of the oligarch's 'raised' by Putin, he's moved on to South America to grow his investments - did so several years ago. Might be a good place to begin to look for connections, might not be a direct connection but if someone wanted to map certain areas around Aruba and the immediate waters beyond - but not draw a red flag to it, perhaps having the search for Natalee as a cover to some degree might have driven this? Or not wanting a competitor of some kind to know you're mapping?

I really don't know and I'd also counsel I have nothing hard or concrete to base that on either. You're smart monkeys though, there IS a reason and it might even be several reasons so don't close your mind to that possibility either. But just as we as a nation in the US are so dependent upon foreign oil resources to the degree it butt-kicked our economy last year - finding and securing oil in previously uncharted areas of our oceans is a pretty big deal and it's got to happen by someone.



Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #797 1/30/09 -
Post by: sharon on January 30, 2009, 05:14:53 PM
Hi Sharon-

You have probably had to confirm that many times, I fear I'm just not able to read through all I miss due to work everyday. Yes it is sad.

Work? Honestly it's a dogfight everyday lately, the squeeze from this economy brings out the worst in many. I do hope yours is going well and better than mine  ::MonkeyWink::

So far, I've been very fortunate in terms that work has continued to find me -- and I've managed to stay quite busy. I bless my lucky stars every day.

But every day is a new day. So there are no guarantees anywhere anymore for anyone. We just have to stay strong -- we will both ride this out. The new opportunities in financial governance are going to be staggering  ::MonkeyWink:: It will make SOX look like child's play.











 



Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #797 1/30/09 -
Post by: Tamikosmom on January 30, 2009, 05:21:15 PM
quote>
KTF

From the posts of former CnG member's.If your not toeing the party line your poofed!So how are you a memeber and not toeing the party line.

quote>

EVIDENTLY YOU CANNOT BE A PART OF CnG IF YOU DON'T AGREE WITH THEIR VIEWS/AGENDA.  SO HOW CAN SOMEONE JUSTIFY BEING A MEMBER AT CnG AND AT SM?  THAT IS A CONTRADICTION IN ITSELF.  I CALL IT TWO-FACED.

THAT IS HOW I SEE IT.



KYcat ... Unlike a cult which attempts to prevent the infiltration of outside influences ... the administrator/s of CnG cannot prevent its members from reading the SM site if that is their  choice.  This I believe will be the catalyst which will cause some members to "come to their senses" and ... realize that they are being partipants in the coverup of John Silvetti's assistance to the finale' of the great Aruban coverup ... participants in the coverup of John Silvetti's betrayal to the family of Natalee Holloway.

This is the reason that I continually post my REMINDERS ... REMINDERS of Kyle Kingman's own words ... Kyle Kingman who held the professional position of ROV Image Analyst aboard the Persistence.

Janet

++++++



Something akin to a cult.  Brainwashing ... comformity and ... adherence.  Then there is the social aspect ... the need to be accepted ... to be loved ... to belong.

The influences are strong.

 ::MonkeyWaa::

Janet





Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #797 1/30/09 -
Post by: Magnolia on January 30, 2009, 05:26:00 PM
quote>
KTF

From the posts of former CnG member's.If your not toeing the party line your poofed!So how are you a memeber and not toeing the party line.

quote>

EVIDENTLY YOU CANNOT BE A PART OF CnG IF YOU DON'T AGREE WITH THEIR VIEWS/AGENDA.  SO HOW CAN SOMEONE JUSTIFY BEING A MEMBER AT CnG AND AT SM?  THAT IS A CONTRADICTION IN ITSELF.  I CALL IT TWO-FACED.

THAT IS HOW I SEE IT.



KYcat ... Unlike a cult which attempts to prevent the infiltration of outside influences ... the administrator/s of CnG cannot prevent its members from reading the SM site if that is their  choice.  This I believe will be the catalyst which will cause some members to "come to their senses" and ... realize that they are being partipants in the coverup of John Silvetti's assistance to the finale' of the great Aruban coverup ... participants in the coverup of John Silvetti's betrayal to the family of Natalee Holloway.

This is the reason that I continually post my REMINDERS ... REMINDERS of Kyle Kingman's own words ... Kyle Kingman who held the professional position of ROV Image Analyst aboard the Persistence.

Janet

++++++



Something akin to a cult.  Brainwashing ... comformity and ... adherence.  Then there is the social aspect ... the need to be accepted ... to be loved ... to belong.

The influences are strong.

 ::MonkeyWaa::

Janet





Janet,
They have driven their ducks to a muddy pond.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #797 1/30/09 -
Post by: Tamikosmom on January 30, 2009, 05:33:39 PM
quote>
KTF

From the posts of former CnG member's.If your not toeing the party line your poofed!So how are you a memeber and not toeing the party line.

quote>

EVIDENTLY YOU CANNOT BE A PART OF CnG IF YOU DON'T AGREE WITH THEIR VIEWS/AGENDA.  SO HOW CAN SOMEONE JUSTIFY BEING A MEMBER AT CnG AND AT SM?  THAT IS A CONTRADICTION IN ITSELF.  I CALL IT TWO-FACED.

THAT IS HOW I SEE IT.



KYcat ... Unlike a cult which attempts to prevent the infiltration of outside influences ... the administrator/s of CnG cannot prevent its members from reading the SM site if that is their  choice.  This I believe will be the catalyst which will cause some members to "come to their senses" and ... realize that they are being partipants in the coverup of John Silvetti's assistance to the finale' of the great Aruban coverup ... participants in the coverup of John Silvetti's betrayal to the family of Natalee Holloway.

This is the reason that I continually post my REMINDERS ... REMINDERS of Kyle Kingman's own words ... Kyle Kingman who held the professional position of ROV Image Analyst aboard the Persistence.

Janet

++++++



Something akin to a cult.  Brainwashing ... comformity and ... adherence.  Then there is the social aspect ... the need to be accepted ... to be loved ... to belong.

The influences are strong.

 ::MonkeyWaa::

Janet




I know Magnolia.

 ::MonkeyNoNo::

Janet


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #797 1/30/09 -
Post by: Anna on January 30, 2009, 05:35:26 PM
Judge Denies Request for Equusearch Records.



http://www.cfnews13.com/News/Local/2009/1/30/casey_anthony_ready_to_face_court.html

 
This was posted in the Caylee thread this morning by trimmofthelake. 
I am very glad that Tim Miller will not have to bother with all this as he has more than enough to deal with these days.  Like many of us, Tim is not getting any younger or stronger.



Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #797 1/30/09 -
Post by: sharon on January 30, 2009, 05:38:03 PM
Judge Denies Request for Equusearch Records.



http://www.cfnews13.com/News/Local/2009/1/30/casey_anthony_ready_to_face_court.html

 
This was posted in the Caylee thread this morning by trimmofthelake. 
I am very glad that Tim Miller will not have to bother with all this as he has more than enough to deal with these days.  Like many of us, Tim is not getting any younger or stronger.



Thanks, Anna.

I watched the hearing this morning. I was hoping for this outcome.





Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #797 1/30/09 -
Post by: Keepthefaith on January 30, 2009, 05:38:05 PM
Judge Denies Request for Equusearch Records.



http://www.cfnews13.com/News/Local/2009/1/30/casey_anthony_ready_to_face_court.html

 
This was posted in the Caylee thread this morning by trimmofthelake. 
I am very glad that Tim Miller will not have to bother with all this as he has more than enough to deal with these days.  Like many of us, Tim is not getting any younger or stronger.



AMEN to the Judge!


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #797 1/30/09 -
Post by: Keepthefaith on January 30, 2009, 05:40:52 PM
keepthefaith-

I believe I noticed bleachedblack mention Abramovich recently? He has connections with Aruba and he's one of the oligarch's 'raised' by Putin, he's moved on to South America to grow his investments - did so several years ago. Might be a good place to begin to look for connections, might not be a direct connection but if someone wanted to map certain areas around Aruba and the immediate waters beyond - but not draw a red flag to it, perhaps having the search for Natalee as a cover to some degree might have driven this? Or not wanting a competitor of some kind to know you're mapping?

I really don't know and I'd also counsel I have nothing hard or concrete to base that on either. You're smart monkeys though, there IS a reason and it might even be several reasons so don't close your mind to that possibility either. But just as we as a nation in the US are so dependent upon foreign oil resources to the degree it butt-kicked our economy last year - finding and securing oil in previously uncharted areas of our oceans is a pretty big deal and it's got to happen by someone.



Thanx None!


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #797 1/30/09 -
Post by: KYcat on January 30, 2009, 05:45:10 PM
Judge Denies Request for Equusearch Records.



http://www.cfnews13.com/News/Local/2009/1/30/casey_anthony_ready_to_face_court.html

 
This was posted in the Caylee thread this morning by trimmofthelake. 
I am very glad that Tim Miller will not have to bother with all this as he has more than enough to deal with these days.  Like many of us, Tim is not getting any younger or stronger.



Great News in an otherwise very sad state of affairs.  Thanks, Anna for posting this.  Was praying for this to happen.



Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #797 1/30/09 -
Post by: sharon on January 30, 2009, 05:47:04 PM
oh, how i miss you

 ::MonkeyLaugh:: ::MonkeyLaugh:: ::MonkeyLaugh::

What would CAPS gain by saying it, if not true? All he was saying was that the cage was still there. To disprove there is any interest in it.

He basically admitted that ?someone? 'inside' gave him the cage location  ::MonkeyConfused::

Safe keeping my monkey hiney  ::MonkeyLaugh::

{{{hugs}}}



BINGO!!!

This makes me feel my mind is clearer (more clear) than I thought, having posted about this last thread.  Phew...

I also meant to say -- I'm sorry I missed it  ::MonkeyWaa::

I've had to do a lot of 'scrolling, scrolling, scrolling' lately. 

Your post must have gotten caught in between posts from the grumbling intruders.  ::MonkeyTongue::

I lost count the other night how many pages I went by without even the mention of the name Natalee  ::MonkeyNoNo::   


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #797 1/30/09 -
Post by: Anna on January 30, 2009, 06:02:20 PM
Re: Natalee Case Discussion #779 11/24/08 -
« Reply #532 on: Today at 07:06:45 PM »

From Kyle: May 8, 2008: "I've talked with Peter Shouten numerous times back in February. He hasn't seen anything but knows about the blue fabrics. DeVries and Endemol was interested in purchasing the ROV footage and I was working between them, ABC, and CBS to strike a deal."

http://scaredmonkeys.net/index.php?topic=4179.msg557660#msg557660


Kermit
Re: Natalee Case Discussion #780 11/26/08 -
« Reply #882 on: Today at 02:36:28 AM »

Kyle said: "Louis is currently working with someone who I do not know to put together some documentary on the case, the way it was handled, and what happened during the search. I learned this from Tim T. yesterday. Louis was sold on the idea that it will make him a lot of money.
http://scaredmonkeys.net/index.php?topic=4182.msg564701;topicseen#msg564701






Re: Natalee Case Discussion #779 11/24/08 -
« Reply #642 on: November 25, 2008, 10:12:27 PM »

May 8, 2008 = from Kyle: John Silvetti told me today that he may be returning to Aruba very soon for a few days.

May 19, 2008 = from Kyle:
"I couldn't get the logs from the Persistence. All things "Holloway" were stripped from the boat once it got back to Louisiana

JUNE 10, 2008 = from Kyle:
He's [John Silvetti] seriously making plans to open an Aruba office so he can conduct business easier in S. America and that would allow him to do that.

http://scaredmonkeys.net/index.php?topic=4179.msg557914;topicseen#msg557914





Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #797 1/30/09 -
Post by: Keepthefaith on January 30, 2009, 06:03:20 PM
TM.That picture from the previous thread of Natalee would be great! ::MonkeyWink::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #797 1/30/09 -
Post by: Kermit on January 30, 2009, 06:08:48 PM
Kermit never said the email from Lala's was addressesd to him or sent directy from her to him.

Kermit never said the email from Lala's was addressesd to him or sent directy from her to him.

Kermit never said the email from Lala's was addressesd to him or sent directy from her to him.




Jug does know. He may just not be informing Idstlou
Re: Natalee Case Discussion #793 1/13/09
January 17, 2009, 06:21:44 PM »
Kermit ... who is "I".
/http://scaredmonkeys.net/index.php?topic=4371.660
XXXX:  Sat Nov 22, 2008 8:10 am    Post subject:    Reply with quote
Here is a snippet from an email I rec'd from Lalas.
I asked Jug about Schaeffer...he is the oil guy. He was the one that provided the cash to get down there. Silvetti knew he would get more business from Schaeffer if he mapped....while they were looking...the ocean floor. All the crew was asked to do was look for Natalee or anything suspicious as in small things like a cage or bones or whatever.
They do a large mapping process while they are looking for the details. Schaeffer would use the large mapping of the general layout of the ocean floor to further look for oil...etc...while they looked for Natalee too.

Silvetti was the one that offered to look for Natalee and not Schaefer


She did so Ana


(http://img136.imageshack.us/img136/8025/idstlouda0.jpg)





Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #797 1/30/09 -
Post by: texasmom on January 30, 2009, 06:09:15 PM
(http://i21.photobucket.com/albums/b258/texasmom55/Natalee/Natalee_Grad00o9.jpg)

TRUTH & JUSTICE FOR NATALEE!!!!!


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #797 1/30/09 -
Post by: sharon on January 30, 2009, 06:10:17 PM
Thanks, tm  ::MonkeyWink::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #797 1/30/09 -
Post by: Keepthefaith on January 30, 2009, 06:11:07 PM
(http://i21.photobucket.com/albums/b258/texasmom55/Natalee/Natalee_Grad00o9.jpg)

TRUTH & JUSTICE FOR NATALEE!!!!!


                                              THANK YOU TM!


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #797 1/30/09 -
Post by: texasmom on January 30, 2009, 06:15:56 PM


Hi Monkeys!!!!   ::MonkeyDance::

You're welcome sharon and ktf!   ::MonkeyCool::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #797 1/30/09 -
Post by: Keepthefaith on January 30, 2009, 06:17:33 PM
How many times are you gonna make me put on the Feces suit Kermit! ::MonkeyLaugh::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #797 1/30/09 -
Post by: Magnolia on January 30, 2009, 06:19:15 PM
Kermit never said the email from Lala's was addressesd to him or sent directy from her to him.

Kermit never said the email from Lala's was addressesd to him or sent directy from her to him.

Kermit never said the email from Lala's was addressesd to him or sent directy from her to him.




Jug does know. He may just not be informing Idstlou
Re: Natalee Case Discussion #793 1/13/09
January 17, 2009, 06:21:44 PM »
Kermit ... who is "I".
/http://scaredmonkeys.net/index.php?topic=4371.660
XXXX:  Sat Nov 22, 2008 8:10 am    Post subject:    Reply with quote
Here is a snippet from an email I rec'd from Lalas.
I asked Jug about Schaeffer...he is the oil guy. He was the one that provided the cash to get down there. Silvetti knew he would get more business from Schaeffer if he mapped....while they were looking...the ocean floor. All the crew was asked to do was look for Natalee or anything suspicious as in small things like a cage or bones or whatever.
They do a large mapping process while they are looking for the details. Schaeffer would use the large mapping of the general layout of the ocean floor to further look for oil...etc...while they looked for Natalee too.

Silvetti was the one that offered to look for Natalee and not Schaefer


She did so Ana


(http://img136.imageshack.us/img136/8025/idstlouda0.jpg)





I think that ldstlou has a reading comprehension problem.
She only comprehends what she believes.
No matter how one tries to explain to her ...she will not
accept the answers.   I think she is a hopeless case.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #797 1/30/09 -
Post by: always 1 on January 30, 2009, 06:20:20 PM
How many times are you gonna make me put on the Feces suit Kermit! ::MonkeyLaugh::
   ::MonkeyHaHa:: ::MonkeyShocked::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #797 1/30/09 -
Post by: Keepthefaith on January 30, 2009, 06:21:43 PM
How many times are you gonna make me put on the Feces suit Kermit! ::MonkeyLaugh::
   ::MonkeyHaHa:: ::MonkeyShocked::

Gotta keep your head on a swivel when Kermit is around or ya may just get splattered!


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #797 1/30/09 -
Post by: Buckeye on January 30, 2009, 06:21:55 PM
Kermit never said the email from Lala's was addressesd to him or sent directy from her to him.

Kermit never said the email from Lala's was addressesd to him or sent directy from her to him.

Kermit never said the email from Lala's was addressesd to him or sent directy from her to him.




Jug does know. He may just not be informing Idstlou
Re: Natalee Case Discussion #793 1/13/09
January 17, 2009, 06:21:44 PM »
Kermit ... who is "I".
/http://scaredmonkeys.net/index.php?topic=4371.660
XXXX:  Sat Nov 22, 2008 8:10 am    Post subject:    Reply with quote
Here is a snippet from an email I rec'd from Lalas.
I asked Jug about Schaeffer...he is the oil guy. He was the one that provided the cash to get down there. Silvetti knew he would get more business from Schaeffer if he mapped....while they were looking...the ocean floor. All the crew was asked to do was look for Natalee or anything suspicious as in small things like a cage or bones or whatever.
They do a large mapping process while they are looking for the details. Schaeffer would use the large mapping of the general layout of the ocean floor to further look for oil...etc...while they looked for Natalee too.

Silvetti was the one that offered to look for Natalee and not Schaefer


She did so Ana



She did NOT, isa.

Way behind...but...Anna...this IS funny.... ::MonkeyHaHa::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #797 1/30/09 -
Post by: Keepthefaith on January 30, 2009, 06:23:04 PM
Kermit never said the email from Lala's was addressesd to him or sent directy from her to him.

Kermit never said the email from Lala's was addressesd to him or sent directy from her to him.

Kermit never said the email from Lala's was addressesd to him or sent directy from her to him.




Jug does know. He may just not be informing Idstlou
Re: Natalee Case Discussion #793 1/13/09
January 17, 2009, 06:21:44 PM »
Kermit ... who is "I".
/http://scaredmonkeys.net/index.php?topic=4371.660
XXXX:  Sat Nov 22, 2008 8:10 am    Post subject:    Reply with quote
Here is a snippet from an email I rec'd from Lalas.
I asked Jug about Schaeffer...he is the oil guy. He was the one that provided the cash to get down there. Silvetti knew he would get more business from Schaeffer if he mapped....while they were looking...the ocean floor. All the crew was asked to do was look for Natalee or anything suspicious as in small things like a cage or bones or whatever.
They do a large mapping process while they are looking for the details. Schaeffer would use the large mapping of the general layout of the ocean floor to further look for oil...etc...while they looked for Natalee too.

Silvetti was the one that offered to look for Natalee and not Schaefer


She did so Ana



She did NOT, isa.

Way behind...but...Anna...this IS funny.... ::MonkeyHaHa::

Thanx Buckeye.I didn't catch that the first time! ::MonkeyHaHa::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #797 1/30/09 -
Post by: texasmom on January 30, 2009, 06:24:29 PM


Kermit,

I'm sorry you are the target of so much nonsense; for doing the right thing.

What Kyle Kingman should have done....but didn't.   ::MonkeyNoNo::







Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #797 1/30/09 -
Post by: Keepthefaith on January 30, 2009, 06:24:44 PM
Bastibro.How is the sexual deviation research with Paulus.Coming?I'm excited to hear theory! ::MonkeyWink::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #797 1/30/09 -
Post by: texasmom on January 30, 2009, 06:25:59 PM
How many times are you gonna make me put on the Feces suit Kermit! ::MonkeyLaugh::

 ::MonkeyHaHa:: ::MonkeyTongue::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #797 1/30/09 -
Post by: Buckeye on January 30, 2009, 06:26:06 PM
Hugs back Janet......

You are such a good proofreader, please know I meant those who continue to slam Kermit's words, life, occupation, person - certainly not those of you who have always been supportive of Kermit.

No tall europeans yet.......can't say I'm looking but may I have some of your divine shoofly pie?

 ::MonkeyWink::

" Mirror mirror, on the wall, make him rich and make him tall"."

Hi None.  Are you or little none baking at all? 


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #797 1/30/09 -
Post by: Keepthefaith on January 30, 2009, 06:27:33 PM
How many times are you gonna make me put on the Feces suit Kermit! ::MonkeyLaugh::

 ::MonkeyHaHa:: ::MonkeyTongue::

That damn Frog is so elusive! ::MonkeyTongue::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #797 1/30/09 -
Post by: Anna on January 30, 2009, 06:35:17 PM
Note the contradictions.  No wonder we are confused.


oceanexploration
Re: Natalee Case Discussion #715 1/25 -
« Reply #103 on: January 26, 2008, 12:38:25 PM »

Thought you all may find this interesting if you're willing to accept it-

To date, the Aruban police and dive team has been a tremendous help.  They've honestly done a great job. Over the last month we've established a very good working relationship based on openness and trust.  Most of the relationship success was due to getting the media out of the way and working together shoulder to shoulder over time.  We've helped each other however and whenever we can.  They've treated us with decency and respect and we have treated them as friends and allies, which they are. Most of the police and divers are new since this case started and both eager and careful to do things right.  I wish we had a month ahead of the project just to establish the relationships and trust. I know many of you would likely doubt this view, but it's based on the experiences in the field of the entire search team. I too was extremely worried, paranoid, and suspecting in the beginning.  Now, it's clear we're all working towards a common goal.


ocean exploration
Re: Natalee Case Discussion #744 3/19 -
« Reply #201 on: March 19, 2008, 08:21:47 PM »

We had little option other than to have the Aruban dive division recover the samples and bring them back under their care.  Remember we are Americans working in Aruban waters, subject to their laws, invitation, and blessing.  Our hands are tied for the most part. I personally was extremely uncomfortable with the chain of custody, being that we weren't a part of it, but I was powerless to do anything about it.   The samples were photographed in detail by one Aruban diver and the other two investigated the contents of the trap, the dimensions, the rigging, and what surrounded the trap.  From the video, it looked like they did a diligent and careful job with the samples and the underwater photography.  I don't know who has these pictures, but I must assume ALE.

http://scaredmonkeys.net/index.php?topic=2721.msg366857#msg366857


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #797 1/30/09 -
Post by: nonesuche on January 30, 2009, 06:35:22 PM
Sharon-
I'm  happy to hear it's going well for you. Unlike you I don't have deep and wide financials experience but I can tell you this much, I've delivered a major system early in this last year and despite my employer telling me that was 'average' to drive down my incentive, I'm sticking my toe in the waters to determine the value of that skill in the even depressed marketplace ! Tell you what, let me work for you sistah  ::MonkeyHaHa::

Hi Buckeye-
Daughter has run the baking operation but a new website will debut soon and honestly if need be, I'll be doing it right beside her soon enough !

Things sure seem to be hopping around here again, kermit surely proves to be a catalyst!

kermit shows, the posts flow  ::MonkeyWink::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #797 1/30/09 -
Post by: nonesuche on January 30, 2009, 06:40:38 PM
Is Bastibro a sexual psychologist?

Perhaps he/she can make sense of this, it found it's way to my inbox recently.



Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #797 1/30/09 -
Post by: Keepthefaith on January 30, 2009, 06:41:49 PM
Is Bastibro a sexual psychologist?

Perhaps he/she can make sense of this, it found it's way to my inbox recently.



 ::MonkeyDance:: ::MonkeyDance:: ::MonkeyDance:: ::MonkeyDance::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #797 1/30/09 -
Post by: Buckeye on January 30, 2009, 06:42:28 PM
Is Bastibro a sexual psychologist?

Perhaps he/she can make sense of this, it found it's way to my inbox recently.



He looks more like Anita, everyday....


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #797 1/30/09 -
Post by: klaasend on January 30, 2009, 06:42:49 PM
Nonesuche -   ::MonkeyHaHa:: ::MonkeyHaHa:: Now I'm going to have nightmares  ::MonkeyHaHa::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #797 1/30/09 -
Post by: texasmom on January 30, 2009, 06:43:52 PM

Lifesong posted a very good question in the last thread, I don't think it was ever answered.

Quote
Re: Natalee Case Discussion #796 1/27/09 - 1/30/09
« Reply #916 on: Today at 10:54:09 AM » 

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
I'm about to leave for the office, but I have a question and will check back later to hopefully see an answer.  It's a serious question, I'm not being nasty.  If the answer purports to go to credibility, I'll consider that BS.  IMO, Kermit's credibility was earned from the documentation of facts and is not dependent on gender or occupation so that just doesn't hold water. 

Can someone please explain to me what Kermit's gender or occupation has to do with Natalee Holloway, her vicious murder, and the government-sanctioned coverup thereof?

It just seems to me that good people are letting themselves be used as pawns to serve the purpose of some ex-monkey's twisted internet power-trip in trying to create a forum war and it has very, very little to do with the Natalee and/or her family.  Maybe if I can get a clear answer to this question I won't feel this way anymore.

Anyone?  Anyone?



Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #797 1/30/09 -
Post by: hotping on January 30, 2009, 06:44:28 PM
Nonesuche -   ::MonkeyHaHa:: ::MonkeyHaHa:: Now I'm going to have nightmares  ::MonkeyHaHa::
Me Too Klaas...That is after I stop laughing!  ::MonkeyHaHa::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #797 1/30/09 -
Post by: nonesuche on January 30, 2009, 06:46:25 PM
Nonesuche -   ::MonkeyHaHa:: ::MonkeyHaHa:: Now I'm going to have nightmares  ::MonkeyHaHa::
Me Too Klaas...That is after I stop laughing!  ::MonkeyHaHa::

who knew? Guess Thailand brought out the best in the sporter



 ::MonkeyHaHa::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #797 1/30/09 -
Post by: Anna on January 30, 2009, 06:47:25 PM
Does anyone understand class action lawsuits and if so can you explain this one in very, very simple term that even I can understand?




Johnson & Perkinson Announces Filing of Class Action Lawsuit Naming Superior Offshore International, Inc.

Tue Apr 1, 2008 9:25am EDT  SOUTH BURLINGTON, VT, Apr 01 (MARKET WIRE) --
 Johnson & Perkinson hereby announces the filing of a class action lawsuit
naming
Superior Offshore International, Inc. ("Superior Offshore" or the "Company")
(NASDAQ: DEEP), several officers of the Company, and underwriters for the IPO. 
Theaction, docket numbered 08-CV-00987, was filed in the United States District
Court for the Southern District of Texas.  Individuals, families, trusts or
other
entities that purchased Superior Offshore common stock between April 20, 2007
and January 9, 2008, inclusive, have the opportunity to participate as Lead
Plaintiffs in the lawsuit. To do so, you must apply to serve in that capacity
by April 28, 2008.

    Johnson & Perkinson, law firm based in South Burlington, Vermont, has
extensive experience prosecuting investor class actions and actions involving
financial fraud. Attorneys Johnson and Perkinson are both former employees of
the Securities and Exchange Commission. Dedicated to maximizing shareholder
return, members of Johnson & Perkinson have prosecuted complex class actions
alleging securities or consumer fraud/deception on behalf of investors/consumers
against numerous public companies since 1985, resulting in the recovery of many
hundreds of millions of dollars, and have been singled out for excellence by
variouscourts. The firm is litigating, or has recently resolved litigation, as
Lead
or Co-Lead Counsel in securities class actions against Xerox, Priceline,
Wireless Facilities, i2 and Xchange, and serves on the Executive Committee in
the
Global Crossing case.

    The complaint charges the defendants with making a series of materially
false and
misleading statements in the Registration Statement and Prospectus issued in
connection with the IPO, in violation of the Securities Act of 1933.

    If you wish to discuss this action or have any questions concerning this
announcement or your rights or interests with respect to these matters, please
contact Johnson & Perkinson attorneys  Eben F. Duval or James F. Conway, III
toll free at 1-888-459-7855; via email at email@jpclasslaw.com; through our
website at
www.jpclasslaw.com; or by mail at Johnson & Perkinson, 1690 Williston Road,
P.O. Box 2305, South Burlington, Vermont 05403.  Attorneys at Johnson &
Perkinson
can help you decide if seeking appointment as a Lead Plaintiff is right for you.
Your ability to share in any recovery is not affected by your decision to
not seek appointment as a Lead Plaintiff.

   

Contact:
Eben F. Duval
802-862-0030
Email Contact

Copyright 2008, Market Wire, All rights reserved.

-0-



© Thomson Reuters 2008 All rights reserved

http://www.reuters.com/article/pressRelease/idUS141930+01-Apr-2008+MW20080401


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #797 1/30/09 -
Post by: Anna on January 30, 2009, 06:51:24 PM
Is Bastibro a sexual psychologist?

Perhaps he/she can make sense of this, it found it's way to my inbox recently.



He looks more like Anita, everyday....


He really does!   ::MonkeyHaHa::  Well, he did do that Greta interview that she was inclined to believe wearing that odd shade of lipstick so he has never been a conformist.  Thailand would be the place where he could really let go and be himself.



Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #797 1/30/09 -
Post by: nonesuche on January 30, 2009, 06:52:56 PM
Good find Anna. It would take a true legal mind to specify all the points clearly but short story I gather is that during Superior's IPO they broke the rules, perhaps even a measure of fraud within their representation of the stock at the time of IPO?

Class action element mandates the public PSA regarding the case is issued with appropriate contacts for any who purchased the stock at the time of IPO.

Individuals, families, trusts or
other
entities that purchased Superior Offshore common stock between April 20, 2007
and January 9, 2008, inclusive, have the opportunity to participate as Lead
Plaintiffs in the lawsuit. To do so, you must apply to serve in that capacity
by April 28, 2008.


If you fall into that group above in italics with documentation to support it, you are 'invited' to contact the stated law firm to join the lawsuit as a plaintiff.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #797 1/30/09 -
Post by: wreck on January 30, 2009, 06:57:45 PM
I feel Hinky


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #797 1/30/09 -
Post by: Lifesong on January 30, 2009, 06:59:03 PM
Hi Sharon-

Thanks for the warning, I feel sure there will be some payback in store for my daring to ask, there always is a measure of drama attached.

This is what I feel is the most strategic statement that Kyle made, of course I didn't see him post or email this direct to me - so the source always matters too.

That aside it's this passage:
Kyle:   John is not a believer in the trap. He took ALE's word as gospel that it wasn't case related, yet never studied the videos or bothered to inquire further. He had plans on doing business with Aruba and in S. America and he didn't want to hurt any feelings by talks hinting at lack of complete trust and friendship.

I'm accustomed to seeing this all the time, even within boards of non-profits I've served on, there are few if any true philanthropic 'gifts' without a larger purpose or payback. I suspect Jug is pretty accustomed to seeing this too.

At the time we first heard about the Persistence's voyage it boggled my mind how such an expensive operation could even be covered from donations from individuals - unless multi-millionaires and billionaires contributed.

I remain convinced this was the true purpose throughout. Oil is liquid gold and the Russian oligarch's who rose up within oil and gas have migrated to South America and the Carribbean as well - it's the next new frontier for their gold.


I just got home and am a few pages behind, but nonesuche's post made me
want to see these two quotes juxtaposed together.  There's something hinky here, imo.

Kyle:   John is not a believer in the trap. He took ALE's word as gospel that it wasn't case related, yet never studied the videos or bothered to inquire further. He had plans on doing business with Aruba and in S. America and he didn't want to hurt any feelings by talks hinting at lack of complete trust and friendship.



MILLER: I don't think they can stand in our way. With the equipment we got and if we have to go in off of Venezuela. Whereever we need to go into, we've got the equipment. In fact they are more than welcome to be on the ship with us. The ships that we are taking over are a 265 foot ship and a 340 foot ship which have all the latest technology on it. In fact the owner of this company, Louis Shaeffer of Superior Offshore International, Louis called Dave Holloway up about two months ago when I was at Louis' house. He said "Mr Holloway, I'm going to promise you something, if your daughter is in a metal container out there in that water, we are going to bring her home."




Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #797 1/30/09 -
Post by: Keepthefaith on January 30, 2009, 06:59:27 PM
I feel Hinky


What are you trying to say Wreck? ::MonkeyLaugh::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #797 1/30/09 -
Post by: Anna on January 30, 2009, 06:59:46 PM
I think the IPO price was $13.00 and then it went down to $0.16.  At least that is in the ballpark price wise.

For it to fall that quickly, I would think very suspicious and guess that is the point of the class action lawsuit.

BTW, I have been a party to two of those concerning prescription drugs and went to all manner of trouble especially on one, filled out ten page forms, etc. and in the end realized no gain other than being reimbursed for the original cost of the medication!

Attorneys seem to come out best in those things. 


Thanks, None,
that is sort of what I thought.  I just wonder on what basis the suit is based or if a decline in the value of stock that quickly is reason enough in and of itself.



Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #797 1/30/09 -
Post by: hotping on January 30, 2009, 06:59:51 PM
Posted at BFN by Lousw...Beautifuly Written and I thought Everyone Should See It!


Hero Member

Posts: 8604


Miracles Do Happen


     Natalee Missing 44 Months
« on: Today at 08:43:27 AM »   

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Natalee Missing 44 Months
May 30, 2005 - Jan 30, 2009

It has now been 44 months since Natalee went missing in Aruba.  To this day, not one real truth has been spoken or one real piece of evidence has been found that would tell what happened to Natalee or where she may be - whether she may still be alive somewhere or whether she is no longer on this earth.  But, someone does know what happened to her and where she is and it is unconscionable that they have kept this to themselves for all this time knowing full well just how this has affected so many others.

Every parent dreams of watching their beloved child grow up.  Natalee grew in so many ways, but one thing remained constant through the years, and that is how proud her family has always been of her.  Natalee is strong of spirit and will, determined and driven, born with a heart of gold, and she never gave them pause to doubt that she would do wonderful things with her life.  There has never been and will never be another Natalee.  She is special and unique, and God does not duplicate perfection.

There  is no power that would be able to make Natalee's families' hurting hearts ever give up on her.  Their love for her is deeper than words can say.  For 44 months now (1,342 days), we have seen the families of Natalee do everything possible to find their beloved daughter and they have done it with such dignity and grace.  They have shown us what complete, unending and unconditional love really is by their words and actions.  We must always remember that a broken life is something we may not be able to fix, but we must do anything and everything we can to try and help.  We must be there for them, putting their hearts in our hands and letting them know, with love and compassion, that we will be there for them at all times.  We must support them and let them know we will continue to support them until Natalee is found and brought home.  We can not give up on them or give up on Natalee and above all, we must never give up Hope for Natalee.  We must make sure that all their voices continue to be heard loud and strong and that no one ever forgets the wrongs that have been done.



 
 
 


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #797 1/30/09 -
Post by: Buckeye on January 30, 2009, 07:05:46 PM
Posted at BFN by Lousw...Beautifuly Written and I thought Everyone Should See It!


Hero Member

Posts: 8604


Miracles Do Happen


     Natalee Missing 44 Months
« on: Today at 08:43:27 AM »   

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Natalee Missing 44 Months
May 30, 2005 - Jan 30, 2009

It has now been 44 months since Natalee went missing in Aruba.  To this day, not one real truth has been spoken or one real piece of evidence has been found that would tell what happened to Natalee or where she may be - whether she may still be alive somewhere or whether she is no longer on this earth.  But, someone does know what happened to her and where she is and it is unconscionable that they have kept this to themselves for all this time knowing full well just how this has affected so many others.

Every parent dreams of watching their beloved child grow up.  Natalee grew in so many ways, but one thing remained constant through the years, and that is how proud her family has always been of her.  Natalee is strong of spirit and will, determined and driven, born with a heart of gold, and she never gave them pause to doubt that she would do wonderful things with her life.  There has never been and will never be another Natalee.  She is special and unique, and God does not duplicate perfection.

There  is no power that would be able to make Natalee's families' hurting hearts ever give up on her.  Their love for her is deeper than words can say.  For 44 months now (1,342 days), we have seen the families of Natalee do everything possible to find their beloved daughter and they have done it with such dignity and grace.  They have shown us what complete, unending and unconditional love really is by their words and actions.  We must always remember that a broken life is something we may not be able to fix, but we must do anything and everything we can to try and help.  We must be there for them, putting their hearts in our hands and letting them know, with love and compassion, that we will be there for them at all times.  We must support them and let them know we will continue to support them until Natalee is found and brought home.  We can not give up on them or give up on Natalee and above all, we must never give up Hope for Natalee.  We must make sure that all their voices continue to be heard loud and strong and that no one ever forgets the wrongs that have been done.



 
 
 


Amen


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #797 1/30/09 -
Post by: Blue Moon on January 30, 2009, 07:07:25 PM

I find it very telling that they stayed for 4 months and the only human dive was the one done on the cage, which Silvetti & Trehan claim contained nothing.


I have not heard of any action by Beth or Dave (or Jug) to 'fund' the dives for the remaining 100+ 'viable' targets.

I also find that odd.

And I asked this before - but I'll ask again -- how EXACTLY did CAPS know where to dive to find the cage????

In other words -- who gave him the coordinates of the location?? Or was he swimming around in 90' of ocean water and stumbled upon it??

Inquiring minds want to know.


CapsLockWizard
"Another thing , I went to dive a week a go to the same location, and the Cage is still there. If the cage was evidance in a murder case, why is it still in the water."

http://scaredmonkeys.net/index.php?topic=4182.msg564838#msg564838

Of course, this is same post in which Caps said: "on the opening a business in Aruba... no way true. Need an Arubian Partner and the Business law for AVV or ofshore business registered in Aruba is not benefecial." 

And didn't I just see information and links posted in the last day or two that proved that to be untrue?  Is it possible he doesn't dive at all and was just making it up?  Of course, it's possible...
 :smt102



But, if he did really dive --  a boat would have had to take him out to the dive location. It was not right off shore.

How did the boat know where to go??

That's sort of a 'needle in the haystack' analogy. Someone HAD to have given CAPS or the Boat driver the location of the cage. WHO WOULD KNOW THAT other than the crew of the Persistence or ALE

Am I the only one that finds that hinky??

Don't worry -- I'm used to hearing 'yes'  ::MonkeyLaugh::
.



JMO, Eduardo Mansur.  Remember he was said to have been on the ship the entire time.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #797 1/30/09 -
Post by: texasmom on January 30, 2009, 07:12:04 PM


Thanks for bringing lousw's post over Hotping!  Very well written!

 ::MonkeyCool::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #797 1/30/09 -
Post by: San on January 30, 2009, 07:12:30 PM
Kermit never said the email from Lala's was addressesd to him or sent directy from her to him.

Kermit never said the email from Lala's was addressesd to him or sent directy from her to him.

Kermit never said the email from Lala's was addressesd to him or sent directy from her to him.




Jug does know. He may just not be informing Idstlou
Re: Natalee Case Discussion #793 1/13/09
January 17, 2009, 06:21:44 PM »
Kermit ... who is "I".
/http://scaredmonkeys.net/index.php?topic=4371.660
XXXX:  Sat Nov 22, 2008 8:10 am    Post subject:    Reply with quote
Here is a snippet from an email I rec'd from Lalas.
I asked Jug about Schaeffer...he is the oil guy. He was the one that provided the cash to get down there. Silvetti knew he would get more business from Schaeffer if he mapped....while they were looking...the ocean floor. All the crew was asked to do was look for Natalee or anything suspicious as in small things like a cage or bones or whatever.
They do a large mapping process while they are looking for the details. Schaeffer would use the large mapping of the general layout of the ocean floor to further look for oil...etc...while they looked for Natalee too.

Silvetti was the one that offered to look for Natalee and not Schaefer


She did so Ana


(http://img136.imageshack.us/img136/8025/idstlouda0.jpg)





I think that ldstlou has a reading comprehension problem.
She only comprehends what she believes.
No matter how one tries to explain to her ...she will not
accept the answers.
   I think she is a hopeless case.

You are correct Magnolia.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #797 1/30/09 -
Post by: Buckeye on January 30, 2009, 07:13:13 PM
That's sort of a 'needle in the haystack' analogy. Someone HAD to have given CAPS or the Boat driver the location of the cage. WHO WOULD KNOW THAT other than the crew of the Persistence or ALE

Am I the only one that finds that hinky??


There was a siting Xmas eve, a dive then another dive, then the Panther parked on site for two days...shoot, the location was probably posted on the front page of the paper, with pictures (on page two... after the car accidents).  Everyone has probably dove on that site...but...us....and Kyle... ::MonkeyConfused::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #797 1/30/09 -
Post by: Anna on January 30, 2009, 07:15:57 PM
Hotping,

Thanks, that was very nice.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #797 1/30/09 -
Post by: Keepthefaith on January 30, 2009, 07:16:05 PM
Posted at BFN by Lousw...Beautifuly Written and I thought Everyone Should See It!


Hero Member

Posts: 8604


Miracles Do Happen


     Natalee Missing 44 Months
« on: Today at 08:43:27 AM »   

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Natalee Missing 44 Months
May 30, 2005 - Jan 30, 2009

It has now been 44 months since Natalee went missing in Aruba.  To this day, not one real truth has been spoken or one real piece of evidence has been found that would tell what happened to Natalee or where she may be - whether she may still be alive somewhere or whether she is no longer on this earth.  But, someone does know what happened to her and where she is and it is unconscionable that they have kept this to themselves for all this time knowing full well just how this has affected so many others.

Every parent dreams of watching their beloved child grow up.  Natalee grew in so many ways, but one thing remained constant through the years, and that is how proud her family has always been of her.  Natalee is strong of spirit and will, determined and driven, born with a heart of gold, and she never gave them pause to doubt that she would do wonderful things with her life.  There has never been and will never be another Natalee.  She is special and unique, and God does not duplicate perfection.

There  is no power that would be able to make Natalee's families' hurting hearts ever give up on her.  Their love for her is deeper than words can say.  For 44 months now (1,342 days), we have seen the families of Natalee do everything possible to find their beloved daughter and they have done it with such dignity and grace.  They have shown us what complete, unending and unconditional love really is by their words and actions.  We must always remember that a broken life is something we may not be able to fix, but we must do anything and everything we can to try and help.  We must be there for them, putting their hearts in our hands and letting them know, with love and compassion, that we will be there for them at all times.  We must support them and let them know we will continue to support them until Natalee is found and brought home.  We can not give up on them or give up on Natalee and above all, we must never give up Hope for Natalee.  We must make sure that all their voices continue to be heard loud and strong and that no one ever forgets the wrongs that have been done.



 
 
 


            VERY POWERFUL AND BEAUTIFUL......JUSTICE FOR NATALEE HOLLOWAY....

                               ARUBA.WE WILL NEVER,EVER GIVE UP

                                             KEEPTHEFAITH


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #797 1/30/09 -
Post by: Anna on January 30, 2009, 07:18:13 PM
Superior Offshore International Confirms Plan of Liquidation
Fri. January 30, 2009; Posted: 05:26 PM
   

HOUSTON, Jan 30, 2009 (BUSINESS WIRE) -- DEEPQ | | PowerRating -- On January 28, 2009, the United States Bankruptcy Court for the Southern District of Texas confirmed the First Amended Joint Chapter 11 Plan of Liquidation (the "Plan") submitted by Superior Offshore International, Inc. and the Official Committee of Unsecured Creditors (Case No. 08-32590-H2-11). Under the Plan, all equity interests will be cancelled on the Effective Date. Unless stayed, the Effective Date will be February 11, 2009. The Effective Date will serve as the record date for purposes of distributions, if any, to equity interest holders under the Plan unless otherwise ordered by the Bankruptcy Court.


---------


This was posted today. 


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #797 1/30/09 -
Post by: Keepthefaith on January 30, 2009, 07:20:53 PM
Superior Offshore International Confirms Plan of Liquidation
Fri. January 30, 2009; Posted: 05:26 PM
   

HOUSTON, Jan 30, 2009 (BUSINESS WIRE) -- DEEPQ | | PowerRating -- On January 28, 2009, the United States Bankruptcy Court for the Southern District of Texas confirmed the First Amended Joint Chapter 11 Plan of Liquidation (the "Plan") submitted by Superior Offshore International, Inc. and the Official Committee of Unsecured Creditors (Case No. 08-32590-H2-11). Under the Plan, all equity interests will be cancelled on the Effective Date. Unless stayed, the Effective Date will be February 11, 2009. The Effective Date will serve as the record date for purposes of distributions, if any, to equity interest holders under the Plan unless otherwise ordered by the Bankruptcy Court.


---------


This was posted today. 

Schaefer gonna buy everything back for pennies on the dollar?


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #797 1/30/09 -
Post by: hotping on January 30, 2009, 07:22:33 PM


Thanks for bringing lousw's post over Hotping!  Very well written!

 ::MonkeyCool::
YW TM!


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #797 1/30/09 -
Post by: hotping on January 30, 2009, 07:23:36 PM
Hotping,

Thanks, that was very nice.
YW Anna!


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #797 1/30/09 -
Post by: Tamikosmom on January 30, 2009, 07:34:42 PM
I had a cup of tea and a goodie with my neighbour and ... I now am felling so hinky.

 ::MonkeyDance::

Janet



Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #797 1/30/09 -
Post by: Keepthefaith on January 30, 2009, 07:36:10 PM
I had a cup of tea and a goodie with my neighbour and ... I now am felling so hinky.

 ::MonkeyDance::

Janet



What'd you put in that Tea Janet! ::MonkeyDance::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #797 1/30/09 -
Post by: Tamikosmom on January 30, 2009, 07:37:35 PM
I had a cup of tea and a goodie with my neighbour and ... I now am felling so hinky.

 ::MonkeyDance::

Janet



What'd you put in that Tea Janet! ::MonkeyDance::

 ::cartwheel::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #797 1/30/09 -
Post by: wreck on January 30, 2009, 07:38:27 PM
I feel Hinky


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #797 1/30/09 -
Post by: Keepthefaith on January 30, 2009, 07:40:47 PM
O' Lord the Monkey's have gone HINKY! ::MonkeyTongue::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #797 1/30/09 -
Post by: hotping on January 30, 2009, 07:44:22 PM
hin·ky 
Pronunciation: \ˈhiŋ-kē\
Function: adjective
Inflected Form(s): hin·ki·er; hin·ki·est
Etymology: alteration of argot hincty suspicious
Date: 1956
1slang : nervous , jittery
2slang : suspicious

 ::MonkeyShocked:: ::MonkeyWink::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #797 1/30/09 -
Post by: wreck on January 30, 2009, 07:44:41 PM
Urban Dictionary:
Quote
hinky :
 the instant of knowledge when one becomes deeply aware that there is pure evil f**kery afoot. 


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #797 1/30/09 -
Post by: always 1 on January 30, 2009, 07:48:26 PM
I had a cup of tea and a goodie with my neighbour and ... I now am felling so hinky.

 ::MonkeyDance::

Janet


Uh oh, is it catching???


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #797 1/30/09 -
Post by: nonesuche on January 30, 2009, 07:48:50 PM
Anna the Chapter 11 is a huge find. Could be they hope to escape the class action suit or have a larger strategy in mind?

I hate you wasted so much of your time on that prescription class action, I agree the attorneys benefit the most in those cases.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #797 1/30/09 -
Post by: Anna on January 30, 2009, 07:57:22 PM
Anna the Chapter 11 is a huge find. Could be they hope to escape the class action suit or have a larger strategy in mind?

I hate you wasted so much of your time on that prescription class action, I agree the attorneys benefit the most in those cases.


None,
We knew about the class action lawsuit against Louis Schafer but the details of the filing of the Chapter 11 just came out today.

There is a wealth of documents posted here but who has time to read them all.

http://www.tradingmarkets.com/.site/quotescharts/?qm_page=1947&qm_symbol=DEEPQ



I did see in the assets section the sale of some sort of diving apparatus for $4 million.  So diving equipment was apparently available or at least within reach at the time they had none to use for searching the "targets".


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #797 1/30/09 -
Post by: Tamikosmom on January 30, 2009, 07:58:49 PM
Maybe the site that the Panther was anchored gave away the location of the crab/trap.

Janet

++++++++


CAPSLOCKWIZARD - IN HIS OWN WORDS

CAPS:
  “Yes, We (John Silvetti) did have the meeting today. It was a long meeting and we are all set to start the process of a permit to drain. Witness will gave statement to Lawyer (Helen), Lawyer will motion to drain the pond to OM. If Motion denied, will go to media and expose more dirt. John knows everything now and he will stay behind to help and protect. John state the cage was empty. it was full of these broken plastic bags that shows on the cam like skull, but he said to me it is the water doing tricks when picture was taken. He thinks also it is a postoffice. When I told him the story about the cage, he also understand now some things that he could not have question about. Like why is the Panter allways parked over the spot while there is notting anymore in he cage. The meeting end at 5:00 pm and was very good. About the Pipes. They will be checked. Also John thinks that the signs are there but need to drain the pond. Also Withness is 99% it was some one that came from the pond area that he saw, because it looks like a dutch man and was cover in mud from the chest down.”

CAPS:  Another thing , I went to dive a week a go to the same location, and the Cage is still there. If the cage was evidance in a murder case, why is it still in the water


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #797 1/30/09 -
Post by: Tamikosmom on January 30, 2009, 08:00:54 PM
I had a cup of tea and a goodie with my neighbour and ... I now am feeling so hinky.

 ::MonkeyDance::

Janet


Uh oh, is it catching???

No ... it is just feeling that defies description.

 ::cartwheel::

Janet


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #797 1/30/09 -
Post by: Anna on January 30, 2009, 08:01:06 PM
It is just too complicated to wade through, literally a conglomerate of little companies doing business under various names, all intertwined.

But they do now have on record an official plan for their Chapter 11 action as of today.

While I appreciate the philanthropic effort, the timing is a bit odd.  I would think to those shareholders more than a bit.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #797 1/30/09 -
Post by: Tamikosmom on January 30, 2009, 08:01:54 PM
Urban Dictionary:
Quote
hinky :
 the instant of knowledge when one becomes deeply aware that there is pure evil f**kery afoot. 


 ::MonkeyShocked::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #797 1/30/09 -
Post by: 2NJSons_Mom on January 30, 2009, 08:10:35 PM
Superior Offshore International Confirms Plan of Liquidation
Fri. January 30, 2009; Posted: 05:26 PM
   

HOUSTON, Jan 30, 2009 (BUSINESS WIRE) -- DEEPQ | | PowerRating -- On January 28, 2009, the United States Bankruptcy Court for the Southern District of Texas confirmed the First Amended Joint Chapter 11 Plan of Liquidation (the "Plan") submitted by Superior Offshore International, Inc. and the Official Committee of Unsecured Creditors (Case No. 08-32590-H2-11). Under the Plan, all equity interests will be cancelled on the Effective Date. Unless stayed, the Effective Date will be February 11, 2009. The Effective Date will serve as the record date for purposes of distributions, if any, to equity interest holders under the Plan unless otherwise ordered by the Bankruptcy Court.


---------


This was posted today. 

They originally filed Chapter 11 last April....so this would mean it's amended and there is no recouping or renewing of the business & liquidation (vaporization ;) ) is the plan?


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #797 1/30/09 -
Post by: nonesuche on January 30, 2009, 08:10:37 PM
It is just too complicated to wade through, literally a conglomerate of little companies doing business under various names, all intertwined.

But they do now have on record an official plan for their Chapter 11 action as of today.

While I appreciate the philanthropic effort, the timing is a bit odd.  I would think to those shareholders more than a bit.

Anna I quite agree. It will take a mind far bigger than mine to make sense of it.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #797 1/30/09 -
Post by: wreck on January 30, 2009, 08:11:10 PM
Urban Dictionary:
Quote
hinky :
 the instant of knowledge when one becomes deeply aware that there is pure evil f**kery afoot. 


 ::MonkeyShocked::

shocking -- but a pretty accurate description!   ::MonkeyCool::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #797 1/30/09 -
Post by: 2NJSons_Mom on January 30, 2009, 08:17:06 PM
Anna the Chapter 11 is a huge find. Could be they hope to escape the class action suit or have a larger strategy in mind?

I hate you wasted so much of your time on that prescription class action, I agree the attorneys benefit the most in those cases.


None,
We knew about the class action lawsuit against Louis Schafer but the details of the filing of the Chapter 11 just came out today.

There is a wealth of documents posted here but who has time to read them all.

http://www.tradingmarkets.com/.site/quotescharts/?qm_page=1947&qm_symbol=DEEPQ



I did see in the assets section the sale of some sort of diving apparatus for $4 million.  So diving equipment was apparently available or at least within reach at the time they had none to use for searching the "targets".

Sorry, Anna, I was a bit behind and have looked at many articles in the past several weeks on this company....thanks for this link.   I have noticed many symbol variations with recent financial or industrial institutions in trouble.  Seems they slice the pie in tiny pieces....and I definitely do not have a degree in finance.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #797 1/30/09 -
Post by: Anna on January 30, 2009, 08:19:52 PM
Superior Offshore International Confirms Plan of Liquidation
Fri. January 30, 2009; Posted: 05:26 PM
   

HOUSTON, Jan 30, 2009 (BUSINESS WIRE) -- DEEPQ | | PowerRating -- On January 28, 2009, the United States Bankruptcy Court for the Southern District of Texas confirmed the First Amended Joint Chapter 11 Plan of Liquidation (the "Plan") submitted by Superior Offshore International, Inc. and the Official Committee of Unsecured Creditors (Case No. 08-32590-H2-11). Under the Plan, all equity interests will be cancelled on the Effective Date. Unless stayed, the Effective Date will be February 11, 2009. The Effective Date will serve as the record date for purposes of distributions, if any, to equity interest holders under the Plan unless otherwise ordered by the Bankruptcy Court.


---------


This was posted today. 

They originally filed Chapter 11 last April....so this would mean it's amended and there is no recouping or renewing of the business & liquidation (vaporization ;) ) is the plan?


That could well be what it means.

As we have seen in the Kalpoe lawsuit, things move very slowly.  But I take it the shareholders are not at all happy with the liquidation or distribution from it to fila the class action suit?

I just don't know and it is too massive to try to read it all.

The dive equipment that was sold I did find interesting, however.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #797 1/30/09 -
Post by: klaasend on January 30, 2009, 08:24:13 PM
Speaking of the Kalpoe vs. Dr. Phil case:

Future Hearings
03/26/2009 at 08:30 am in department 69 at 111 North Hill Street, Los Angeles, CA 90012
Motion to Compel (Further Interrogatory Responsesand Production of Documents (4);2) Second Motion to Dismiss andRequest for Terminating Sanctions3) Case Management Conference)



Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #797 1/30/09 -
Post by: Tamikosmom on January 30, 2009, 08:26:25 PM
Speaking of the Kalpoe vs. Dr. Phil case:

Future Hearings
03/26/2009 at 08:30 am in department 69 at 111 North Hill Street, Los Angeles, CA 90012
Motion to Compel (Further Interrogatory Responsesand Production of Documents (4);2) Second Motion to Dismiss andRequest for Terminating Sanctions3) Case Management Conference)



 ::MonkeyWaa::

I don't understand but ... according to Wreck's definition ... I am feeling hinky.

Janet


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #797 1/30/09 -
Post by: Sam on January 30, 2009, 08:27:13 PM
Urban Dictionary:
Quote
hinky :
 the instant of knowledge when one becomes deeply aware that there is pure evil f**kery afoot. 


Thank you for posting the urban dictionary definition.  I think that is how most of us felt very soon after Natalee was reported missing.

Hotping, thanks for posting the post from Louz (Spelling error) It was beautiful.

Anna, great find on Louis Schafer and details of the filing of the Chapter 11 that just came out .

Janet, thank you for being a voice of reason about the negative post on fellow monkeys.

To all remember United we Stand divided we fall.

I do not now or have I ever belonged to chat and grumble but I do know some of our Monkeys who do .

I do belong to Blogs for Natalee as well as Gold Monkeys. Every one of these I do believe honestly and truly want Justice for Natalee. JMHO
Sam




Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #797 1/30/09 -
Post by: Blue Moon on January 30, 2009, 08:29:38 PM
Speaking of the Kalpoe vs. Dr. Phil case:

Future Hearings
03/26/2009 at 08:30 am in department 69 at 111 North Hill Street, Los Angeles, CA 90012
Motion to Compel (Further Interrogatory Responsesand Production of Documents (4);2) Second Motion to Dismiss andRequest for Terminating Sanctions3) Case Management Conference)



Am I the only one who thinks our Justice systems stinks to high-heaven to all these two scrums of the earth to us our system like this?  What is the purpose to keep continuing this case, set a future date, just to set another future date.  Doesn't make sense to me at all.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #797 1/30/09 -
Post by: klaasend on January 30, 2009, 08:29:44 PM
Speaking of the Kalpoe vs. Dr. Phil case:

Future Hearings
03/26/2009 at 08:30 am in department 69 at 111 North Hill Street, Los Angeles, CA 90012
Motion to Compel (Further Interrogatory Responsesand Production of Documents (4);2) Second Motion to Dismiss andRequest for Terminating Sanctions3) Case Management Conference)



Most recent doc filed:

(http://i118.photobucket.com/albums/o100/klaasen3/Sub5/k012609a.jpg)

(http://i118.photobucket.com/albums/o100/klaasen3/Sub5/k012609b.jpg)


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #797 1/30/09 -
Post by: Blue Moon on January 30, 2009, 08:30:24 PM
Speaking of the Kalpoe vs. Dr. Phil case:

Future Hearings
03/26/2009 at 08:30 am in department 69 at 111 North Hill Street, Los Angeles, CA 90012
Motion to Compel (Further Interrogatory Responsesand Production of Documents (4);2) Second Motion to Dismiss andRequest for Terminating Sanctions3) Case Management Conference)



Am I the only one who thinks our Justice systems stinks to high-heaven to allow these two scrums of the earth to us our system like this?  What is the purpose to keep continuing this case, set a future date, just to set another future date.  Doesn't make sense to me at all.

correction from all to allow. sorry.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #797 1/30/09 -
Post by: 2NJSons_Mom on January 30, 2009, 08:35:58 PM
Superior Offshore International Confirms Plan of Liquidation
Fri. January 30, 2009; Posted: 05:26 PM
   

HOUSTON, Jan 30, 2009 (BUSINESS WIRE) -- DEEPQ | | PowerRating -- On January 28, 2009, the United States Bankruptcy Court for the Southern District of Texas confirmed the First Amended Joint Chapter 11 Plan of Liquidation (the "Plan") submitted by Superior Offshore International, Inc. and the Official Committee of Unsecured Creditors (Case No. 08-32590-H2-11). Under the Plan, all equity interests will be cancelled on the Effective Date. Unless stayed, the Effective Date will be February 11, 2009. The Effective Date will serve as the record date for purposes of distributions, if any, to equity interest holders under the Plan unless otherwise ordered by the Bankruptcy Court.


---------


This was posted today. 

They originally filed Chapter 11 last April....so this would mean it's amended and there is no recouping or renewing of the business & liquidation (vaporization ;) ) is the plan?


That could well be what it means.

As we have seen in the Kalpoe lawsuit, things move very slowly.  But I take it the shareholders are not at all happy with the liquidation or distribution from it to fila the class action suit?

I just don't know and it is too massive to try to read it all.

The dive equipment that was sold I did find interesting, however.

I believe the class action suit was also filed last year.  The went public spring of '07 at $13-$15 per share and took a nose dive the following quarters.  Mid-Nov, '07, Schaefer sold what he could for as much as he could.  I sat and read a finance message board one night last week and stockholders had been complaining that the officers had been selling off during the 2nd & 3rd qtrs instead of buying.  I think the shareholders felt they were taken and the suit is the result. 


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #797 1/30/09 -
Post by: Keepthefaith on January 30, 2009, 08:40:23 PM
Superior Offshore International Confirms Plan of Liquidation
Fri. January 30, 2009; Posted: 05:26 PM
   

HOUSTON, Jan 30, 2009 (BUSINESS WIRE) -- DEEPQ | | PowerRating -- On January 28, 2009, the United States Bankruptcy Court for the Southern District of Texas confirmed the First Amended Joint Chapter 11 Plan of Liquidation (the "Plan") submitted by Superior Offshore International, Inc. and the Official Committee of Unsecured Creditors (Case No. 08-32590-H2-11). Under the Plan, all equity interests will be cancelled on the Effective Date. Unless stayed, the Effective Date will be February 11, 2009. The Effective Date will serve as the record date for purposes of distributions, if any, to equity interest holders under the Plan unless otherwise ordered by the Bankruptcy Court.


---------


This was posted today. 

They originally filed Chapter 11 last April....so this would mean it's amended and there is no recouping or renewing of the business & liquidation (vaporization ;) ) is the plan?


That could well be what it means.

As we have seen in the Kalpoe lawsuit, things move very slowly.  But I take it the shareholders are not at all happy with the liquidation or distribution from it to fila the class action suit?

I just don't know and it is too massive to try to read it all.

The dive equipment that was sold I did find interesting, however.

I believe the class action suit was also filed last year.  The went public spring of '07 at $13-$15 per share and took a nose dive the following quarters.  Mid-Nov, '07, Schaefer sold what he could for as much as he could.  I sat and read a finance message board one night last week and stockholders had been complaining that the officers had been selling off during the 2nd & 3rd qtrs instead of buying.  I think the shareholders felt they were taken and the suit is the result. 

Are the attorney's for the plaintiff's in this class-action aware of the Persistence search,and or should someone give them a call? ::MonkeyCool::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #797 1/30/09 -
Post by: Tamikosmom on January 30, 2009, 08:41:49 PM
Urban Dictionary:
Quote
hinky :
 the instant of knowledge when one becomes deeply aware that there is pure evil f**kery afoot. 


Thank you for posting the urban dictionary definition.  I think that is how most of us felt very soon after Natalee was reported missing.

Hotping, thanks for posting the post from Louz (Spelling error) It was beautiful.

Anna, great find on Louis Schafer and details of the filing of the Chapter 11 that just came out .

Janet, thank you for being a voice of reason about the negative post on fellow monkeys.

To all remember United we Stand divided we fall.

I do not now or have I ever belonged to chat and grumble but I do know some of our Monkeys who do .

I do belong to Blogs for Natalee as well as Gold Monkeys. Every one of these I do believe honestly and truly want Justice for Natalee. JMHO
Sam




Sam ... I may be a voice of reason in regards to our prodigal CnG Monkeys but ... I am uncompromising in my opposition to the words of those prodigal CnG Monkeys who undermine the messenger (Kermit) who has exposed John Silvetti's assistance in the finale' to the great Aruban coverup ... who has exposed John Silvetti's ultimate betrayal of Natalee's family.

I cannot comprehend the reasoning.

Janet

++++++++


KYLE KINGMAN - IN HIS OWN WORDS

Kyle:
  John is not a believer in the trap. He took ALE's word as gospel that it wasn't case related, yet never studied the videos or bothered to inquire further. He had plans on doing business with Aruba and in S. America and he didn't want to hurt any feelings by talks hinting at lack of complete trust and friendship.

Kyle:  I took the proportions of the body form from the head, to shoulder, to a 90 degree angle which I believed to be the hem line of Natalee's skirt. I then took those proportions and matched them to the photo of Natalee with what she was last seen wearing. The proportions matched within an inch from head, to shoulder, to skirt line. Based on this comparison and with what we believed we saw in the Dec 29th video, Tim Miller contacted the family and told them the 99.9% comment. I told Tim not to do anything until we have forensic results back after the site is processed. Jan 7th we sampled the contents and in my opinion we found the skirt under the sand along with the other items The blue fabric was found right where the skirt is pictured. If it isn't her, it will forever haunt me as a major cosmic WTF.

Kyle:   John didn't want Tim Miller on board the Persistence because he said Tim wasn't necessary any more and was a liability.

Kyle:   He (Tim Miller) stepped off on or about the 1st of Jan to follow up on the false lead in Costa Rica IIRC.

Kyle:   The Persistence had no divers on the 7th. Tim Trahan was our diver on the 30th-Dec, but he was out of the country at the time. The Aruban divers were on the police boat, dove from their boat, and returned to their boat.
 
Kyle:  They were immediately whisked away by the Aruban police and not seen of again by us on the 7th.

Kyle:  I get done in the survey room backing up the ROV dive and head to the back deck to talk to the Polis divers and see what they sampled and see the Polis boat way in the distance heading away fast. John doesn't seem concerned at all, but I am very dissapointed, concerned, and burning inside because I have a feeling that I/we will never know what they took from the trap. That evening I talked to John asking when we plan on recovering the trap. Previously this was part of the talks and plan, but this time he doesn't seem concerned about ever looking into the trap further. After John verbally BASHED me about the trap for what I said to Tim Miller about the sand body-form and that I believed her skirt was under the sand, John pretty much committed himself to the belief the trap wasn't what we were after. This shocked me because it was exactly what we were looking for- a fish trap lost at sea with human remains.

Kyle: Remember after the Jan-7th dive which sampled the trap Richardson told John emphatically to "keep searching she's still out there in the deep ocean".

Kyle: John Silvetti told me today that he may be returning to Aruba very soon for a few days. (05/08/08)

Kyle: He's [John Silvetti] seriously making plans to open an Aruba office so he can conduct business easier in S. America and that would allow him to do that. (06/10/08)


'Scarborough Country' for July 14
updated 8:45 a.m. PT, Fri., July. 15, 2005


JUG TWITTY, NATALEE HOLLOWAY'S STEPFATHER: Beth and I have been through this emotional roller coaster. And all we want is Natalee, whether she's alive or dead. We want to bring her back to the United States, and we'll leave and they can do whatever they want to do.

http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/8551824/


'The Abrams Report' for July 1
updated 7:47 a.m. PT, Wed., July. 6, 2005


BETH HOLLOWAY TWITTY, NATALEE HOLLOWAY'S MOTHER:  We cannot forget to demand and expect to have Natalee.  Natalee deserves to return to her country.  She deserves it, and everyone knows it, Martin, every single person.  Every single person knows that.  They know it.

http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/8485029/


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #797 1/30/09 -
Post by: Lifesong on January 30, 2009, 08:43:54 PM
Source: Marketwire (April 11, 2008 - 12:30 PM EDT)

Law Office of David R. Chase, P.A. Announces Its Investigaton Into Alleged Securities Violations by Superior Offshore International, Inc.

The Law Office of David R. Chase, P.A. (the "Firm") announces that it is investigating alleged securities violations by Superior Offshore International, Inc. ("Superior Offshore") (NASDAQ: DEEP), and certain of its officers, directors and the underwriters of its IPO. The Firm currently represents a Superior Offshore shareholder who has suffered substantial monetary loss.

Several class action lawsuits naming Superior Offshore, among others, have been filed in the United States District Courts in Texas and Louisiana. The complaints charge the defendants with making a series of materially false and misleading statements in the Registration Statement and Prospectus issued in connection with the IPO in violation of the Securities Act of 1933.

Individuals, families, trusts and other entities that purchased Superior Offshore common stock between April 20, 2007 and January 9, 2008, inclusive, have the opportunity to participate as Lead Plaintiffs in the lawsuit. To do so, you must apply to serve in that capacity by April 28, 2008.

The Law Office of David R. Chase, P.A., based in Fort Lauderdale, Florida, has extensive experience representing defrauded investors in securities litigation matters. The principal, David R. Chase, previously served as Senior Counsel in the Enforcement Division of the Securities and Exchange Commission. More about the firm, and its principal, David R. Chase, is available on its website at: www.davidchaselaw.com.

If you wish to discuss this notice or your rights and interests with regard to this matter without obligation or cost, please contact:

David R. Chase, Esq.
Law Office of David R. Chase, P.A.
1700 East Las Olas Boulevard
Penthouse 2
Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301
888-337-8625 (Toll Free)
954-920-7779
Email: Email Contact


http://www.tradingmarkets.com/.site/quotescharts/news/




Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #797 1/30/09 -
Post by: Keepthefaith on January 30, 2009, 08:44:44 PM
The Hinky Tea Janet was drinking must be wearing off.The voice of reason is back! ::MonkeyDance:: ::MonkeyDance::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #797 1/30/09 -
Post by: Sam on January 30, 2009, 08:46:18 PM
Klaas thanks for posting the screen shots on the Kalpoes -Dr. Phil case.

2NJSONS Mom, Glad to see you are still at that ironing board and yet still manage to find the time to research and post for Natalee.



Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #797 1/30/09 -
Post by: Keepthefaith on January 30, 2009, 08:48:03 PM
Source: Marketwire (April 11, 2008 - 12:30 PM EDT)

Law Office of David R. Chase, P.A. Announces Its Investigaton Into Alleged Securities Violations by Superior Offshore International, Inc.

The Law Office of David R. Chase, P.A. (the "Firm") announces that it is investigating alleged securities violations by Superior Offshore International, Inc. ("Superior Offshore") (NASDAQ: DEEP), and certain of its officers, directors and the underwriters of its IPO. The Firm currently represents a Superior Offshore shareholder who has suffered substantial monetary loss.

Several class action lawsuits naming Superior Offshore, among others, have been filed in the United States District Courts in Texas and Louisiana. The complaints charge the defendants with making a series of materially false and misleading statements in the Registration Statement and Prospectus issued in connection with the IPO in violation of the Securities Act of 1933.

Individuals, families, trusts and other entities that purchased Superior Offshore common stock between April 20, 2007 and January 9, 2008, inclusive, have the opportunity to participate as Lead Plaintiffs in the lawsuit. To do so, you must apply to serve in that capacity by April 28, 2008.

The Law Office of David R. Chase, P.A., based in Fort Lauderdale, Florida, has extensive experience representing defrauded investors in securities litigation matters. The principal, David R. Chase, previously served as Senior Counsel in the Enforcement Division of the Securities and Exchange Commission. More about the firm, and its principal, David R. Chase, is available on its website at: www.davidchaselaw.com.

If you wish to discuss this notice or your rights and interests with regard to this matter without obligation or cost, please contact:

David R. Chase, Esq.
Law Office of David R. Chase, P.A.
1700 East Las Olas Boulevard
Penthouse 2
Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301
888-337-8625 (Toll Free)
954-920-7779
Email: Email Contact


http://www.tradingmarkets.com/.site/quotescharts/news/




I think it would definitely give them a direction to investigate.Maybe not.Someone a little more knowledgable may fare better then i with a anonymous phone-call?Just a thought.Throw nanner's if necessary!TIA.

KEEPTHEFAITH


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #797 1/30/09 -
Post by: Tamikosmom on January 30, 2009, 08:51:59 PM
The Hinky Tea Janet was drinking must be wearing off.The voice of reason is back! ::MonkeyDance:: ::MonkeyDance::

 ::MonkeyShocked::

Keepthefaith ... I did not realize my attempt to be the voice of reason took a leave.

My position as always been in all aspects of life that a genuine change of heart equates to forgiveness.

However ... in regards to our prodical Monkeys ... until that genuine change of heart occurs ... I am uncompromising in my opposition to any force that upholds those who are preventing justice from prevail for Natalee Holloway.

Janet







Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #797 1/30/09 -
Post by: Lifesong on January 30, 2009, 08:55:56 PM
Posted at BFN by Lousw...Beautifuly Written and I thought Everyone Should See It!
Hero Member
Posts: 8604


Miracles Do Happen


     Natalee Missing 44 Months
« on: Today at 08:43:27 AM »   

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Natalee Missing 44 Months
May 30, 2005 - Jan 30, 2009

It has now been 44 months since Natalee went missing in Aruba.  To this day, not one real truth has been spoken or one real piece of evidence has been found that would tell what happened to Natalee or where she may be - whether she may still be alive somewhere or whether she is no longer on this earth.  But, someone does know what happened to her and where she is and it is unconscionable that they have kept this to themselves for all this time knowing full well just how this has affected so many others.

Every parent dreams of watching their beloved child grow up.  Natalee grew in so many ways, but one thing remained constant through the years, and that is how proud her family has always been of her.  Natalee is strong of spirit and will, determined and driven, born with a heart of gold, and she never gave them pause to doubt that she would do wonderful things with her life.  There has never been and will never be another Natalee.  She is special and unique, and God does not duplicate perfection.

There  is no power that would be able to make Natalee's families' hurting hearts ever give up on her.  Their love for her is deeper than words can say.  For 44 months now (1,342 days), we have seen the families of Natalee do everything possible to find their beloved daughter and they have done it with such dignity and grace.  They have shown us what complete, unending and unconditional love really is by their words and actions.  We must always remember that a broken life is something we may not be able to fix, but we must do anything and everything we can to try and help.  We must be there for them, putting their hearts in our hands and letting them know, with love and compassion, that we will be there for them at all times.  We must support them and let them know we will continue to support them until Natalee is found and brought home.  We can not give up on them or give up on Natalee and above all, we must never give up Hope for Natalee.  We must make sure that all their voices continue to be heard loud and strong and that no one ever forgets the wrongs that have been done.



Talk about perspective, thank you so much for posting this Hotping!

I love that its titled Miracle Do Happen.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #797 1/30/09 -
Post by: Anna on January 30, 2009, 09:02:04 PM
Source: Marketwire (April 11, 2008 - 12:30 PM EDT)

Law Office of David R. Chase, P.A. Announces Its Investigaton Into Alleged Securities Violations by Superior Offshore International, Inc.

The Law Office of David R. Chase, P.A. (the "Firm") announces that it is investigating alleged securities violations by Superior Offshore International, Inc. ("Superior Offshore") (NASDAQ: DEEP), and certain of its officers, directors and the underwriters of its IPO. The Firm currently represents a Superior Offshore shareholder who has suffered substantial monetary loss.

Several class action lawsuits naming Superior Offshore, among others, have been filed in the United States District Courts in Texas and Louisiana. The complaints charge the defendants with making a series of materially false and misleading statements in the Registration Statement and Prospectus issued in connection with the IPO in violation of the Securities Act of 1933.

Individuals, families, trusts and other entities that purchased Superior Offshore common stock between April 20, 2007 and January 9, 2008, inclusive, have the opportunity to participate as Lead Plaintiffs in the lawsuit. To do so, you must apply to serve in that capacity by April 28, 2008.

The Law Office of David R. Chase, P.A., based in Fort Lauderdale, Florida, has extensive experience representing defrauded investors in securities litigation matters. The principal, David R. Chase, previously served as Senior Counsel in the Enforcement Division of the Securities and Exchange Commission. More about the firm, and its principal, David R. Chase, is available on its website at: www.davidchaselaw.com.

If you wish to discuss this notice or your rights and interests with regard to this matter without obligation or cost, please contact:

David R. Chase, Esq.
Law Office of David R. Chase, P.A.
1700 East Las Olas Boulevard
Penthouse 2
Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301
888-337-8625 (Toll Free)
954-920-7779
Email: Email Contact


http://www.tradingmarkets.com/.site/quotescharts/news/




I think it would definitely give them a direction to investigate.Maybe not.Someone a little more knowledgable may fare better then i with a anonymous phone-call?Just a thought.Throw nanner's if necessary!TIA.

KEEPTHEFAITH


I don't know, KTF, but I would think the attorneys already know all about their involvement in the search as well as any other business they have conducted over the last couple of years.  I think that would be a requirement to disclose.



Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #797 1/30/09 -
Post by: Anna on January 30, 2009, 09:03:31 PM
Must go watch Monk!

BBL if I don't fall asleep.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #797 1/30/09 -
Post by: wreck on January 30, 2009, 09:11:42 PM
Source: Marketwire (April 11, 2008 - 12:30 PM EDT)

Law Office of David R. Chase, P.A. Announces Its Investigaton Into Alleged Securities Violations by Superior Offshore International, Inc.

The Law Office of David R. Chase, P.A. (the "Firm") announces that it is investigating alleged securities violations by Superior Offshore International, Inc. ("Superior Offshore") (NASDAQ: DEEP), and certain of its officers, directors and the underwriters of its IPO. The Firm currently represents a Superior Offshore shareholder who has suffered substantial monetary loss.

Several class action lawsuits naming Superior Offshore, among others, have been filed in the United States District Courts in Texas and Louisiana. The complaints charge the defendants with making a series of materially false and misleading statements in the Registration Statement and Prospectus issued in connection with the IPO in violation of the Securities Act of 1933.

Individuals, families, trusts and other entities that purchased Superior Offshore common stock between April 20, 2007 and January 9, 2008, inclusive, have the opportunity to participate as Lead Plaintiffs in the lawsuit. To do so, you must apply to serve in that capacity by April 28, 2008.

The Law Office of David R. Chase, P.A., based in Fort Lauderdale, Florida, has extensive experience representing defrauded investors in securities litigation matters. The principal, David R. Chase, previously served as Senior Counsel in the Enforcement Division of the Securities and Exchange Commission. More about the firm, and its principal, David R. Chase, is available on its website at: www.davidchaselaw.com.

If you wish to discuss this notice or your rights and interests with regard to this matter without obligation or cost, please contact:

David R. Chase, Esq.
Law Office of David R. Chase, P.A.
1700 East Las Olas Boulevard
Penthouse 2
Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301
888-337-8625 (Toll Free)
954-920-7779
Email: Email Contact


http://www.tradingmarkets.com/.site/quotescharts/news/




I think it would definitely give them a direction to investigate.Maybe not.Someone a little more knowledgable may fare better then i with a anonymous phone-call?Just a thought.Throw nanner's if necessary!TIA.

KEEPTHEFAITH


I don't know, KTF, but I would think the attorneys already know all about their involvement in the search as well as any other business they have conducted over the last couple of years.  I think that would be a requirement to disclose.


Of course they know -- why would ANY company in financial trouble dedicate their resources to a "non-profit", "charitable" operation for 3 months?!?!?


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #797 1/30/09 -
Post by: 2NJSons_Mom on January 30, 2009, 09:17:56 PM
Klaas thanks for posting the screen shots on the Kalpoes -Dr. Phil case.

2NJSONS Mom, Glad to see you are still at that ironing board and yet still manage to find the time to research and post for Natalee.



Hey, I'll never give up on Justice for Natalee and love the research.  Don't let my ironing board lead you to think otherwise.  Thanks, Sam.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #797 1/30/09 -
Post by: Lifesong on January 30, 2009, 09:19:33 PM
Quote
http://www.tradingmarkets.com/.site/quotescharts/news/

February 29, 2008 - 12:16 AM EST

INVESTOR ALERT: KGS Announces the Initial Filing of Securities Class Action Lawsuit Against Superior Offshore International, Inc. -- DEEP

<snip>

On April 20, 2007, Superior Offshore and Company insiders sold over 10 million shares of common stock to the public, raising gross proceeds in excess of $152 million. However, unbeknownst to investors at the time of the IPO, the Company's core business was not performing according to plan, its core market in the Gulf of Mexico was declining, and defendants would be forced to immediately transform and reorganize the Company, and enter into new, untested markets such as Deep Water and International Operations. Moreover, at the time of the IPO, Superior Offshore was not operating according to plan, such that the Company's sales already had been, and foreseeably would continue to be, adversely affected.

Beginning on August 14, 2007 -- after defendants and other Company insiders liquidated over $49 million of their personally held shares -- Superior Offshore revealed the truth about the Company, including that the problems existing at the time of the IPO would result in extremely disappointing results for the foreseeable near-term, and would force defendants to reorganize and transform the Company. Later, on November 14, 2007, shares again declined after defendants belatedly revealed that the Company was operating even below its recently revised forecasts, and that its core business was operating even worse than previously disclosed. On January 9, 2008, the Company announced that it was suspending its prior substantially downward revised guidance.

Following these belated disclosures, shares of Superior Offshore fell from their offering price of $15 per share to approximately $3.50 per share as a direct result of defendants' belated disclosures.

<snip>


It is quite a long article so I snipped 5 or 6 paragraphs.


When/what month did Louis Shaeffer originally call Dave Holloway?  Does someone have that?

Quote
MILLER: I don't think they can stand in our way. With the equipment we got and if we have to go in off of Venezuela. Whereever we need to go into, we've got the equipment. In fact they are more than welcome to be on the ship with us. The ships that we are taking over are a 265 foot ship and a 340 foot ship which have all the latest technology on it. In fact the owner of this company, Louis Shaeffer of Superior Offshore International, Louis called Dave Holloway up about two months ago when I was at Louis' house. He said "Mr Holloway, I'm going to promise you something, if your daughter is in a metal container out there in that water, we are going to bring her home."






Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #797 1/30/09 -
Post by: Magnolia on January 30, 2009, 09:21:10 PM
FWIW... I never believed Kyle's account of the Panter,
even when I believed the search was legit.
It never made sense to me.  I don't think he could see
the area off of Arishi Beach from the hotel area.
To me it always seemed like he told that story to
cover for something else.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #797 1/30/09 -
Post by: 2NJSons_Mom on January 30, 2009, 09:21:42 PM
Source: Marketwire (April 11, 2008 - 12:30 PM EDT)

Law Office of David R. Chase, P.A. Announces Its Investigaton Into Alleged Securities Violations by Superior Offshore International, Inc.

The Law Office of David R. Chase, P.A. (the "Firm") announces that it is investigating alleged securities violations by Superior Offshore International, Inc. ("Superior Offshore") (NASDAQ: DEEP), and certain of its officers, directors and the underwriters of its IPO. The Firm currently represents a Superior Offshore shareholder who has suffered substantial monetary loss.

Several class action lawsuits naming Superior Offshore, among others, have been filed in the United States District Courts in Texas and Louisiana. The complaints charge the defendants with making a series of materially false and misleading statements in the Registration Statement and Prospectus issued in connection with the IPO in violation of the Securities Act of 1933.

Individuals, families, trusts and other entities that purchased Superior Offshore common stock between April 20, 2007 and January 9, 2008, inclusive, have the opportunity to participate as Lead Plaintiffs in the lawsuit. To do so, you must apply to serve in that capacity by April 28, 2008.

The Law Office of David R. Chase, P.A., based in Fort Lauderdale, Florida, has extensive experience representing defrauded investors in securities litigation matters. The principal, David R. Chase, previously served as Senior Counsel in the Enforcement Division of the Securities and Exchange Commission. More about the firm, and its principal, David R. Chase, is available on its website at: www.davidchaselaw.com.

If you wish to discuss this notice or your rights and interests with regard to this matter without obligation or cost, please contact:

David R. Chase, Esq.
Law Office of David R. Chase, P.A.
1700 East Las Olas Boulevard
Penthouse 2
Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301
888-337-8625 (Toll Free)
954-920-7779
Email: Email Contact


http://www.tradingmarkets.com/.site/quotescharts/news/




I think it would definitely give them a direction to investigate.Maybe not.Someone a little more knowledgable may fare better then i with a anonymous phone-call?Just a thought.Throw nanner's if necessary!TIA.

KEEPTHEFAITH


I don't know, KTF, but I would think the attorneys already know all about their involvement in the search as well as any other business they have conducted over the last couple of years.  I think that would be a requirement to disclose.


Of course they know -- why would ANY company in financial trouble dedicate their resources to a "non-profit", "charitable" operation for 3 months?!?!?

This has been something on my mind for some time, now.  It is a big question, and I do hope they know or have attempted to get the facts.  That's why I posted asking on the last thread how much can be claimed as charitable contributions.....


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #797 1/30/09 -
Post by: Tamikosmom on January 30, 2009, 09:22:10 PM
Speaking of the Kalpoe vs. Dr. Phil case:

Future Hearings
03/26/2009 at 08:30 am in department 69 at 111 North Hill Street, Los Angeles, CA 90012
Motion to Compel (Further Interrogatory Responsesand Production of Documents (4);2) Second Motion to Dismiss andRequest for Terminating Sanctions3) Case Management Conference)




Am I the only one who thinks our Justice systems stinks to high-heaven to all these two scrums of the earth to us our system like this?  What is the purpose to keep continuing this case, set a future date, just to set another future date.  Doesn't make sense to me at all.

My take.  The Aruban "powers that be" are funding the multi-million dollar lawsuit and ... the American "powers that be" are bowing.

My youngest son's wise Dutch American FIL believes that Aruba's close ties with Hugo Chavez is at the root of both the Netherland and the United States' tolerance in regards to the corrupt Aruban administration.

Hugo Chávez is so dangerious to the security of world. He has a goal which IS NOT hidden ... a goal which will ultimately threaten the security of United States of America. He had a plan is to acquire one small nation at a time ... building up strength throughout the Caribbean. Think about it ... Aruba is the stepping stone from Venezuala to American ... Cuba is a stone throw from the mainland.

The United States administration knows this ...  yet it continues to appease ... tolerate this dictator. This approach only makes what was once the most feared/respected nation on the face of the earth appear weak and ... gives this dictator who is drunk with power more confidence to further his global agenda.

It is a truly sad day when this dictator is allowed to speak before the UN referring to the President of the United States as the "devil" and ... have no fear of retaliation.

If the United States goes down ... so does every appeasing/tolerant democratic nation in the world ... Canada included.

The free world has to wake up ... left-wing dictators as well as Islamic nations are gaining strength through our weaknesses.

“The reality is that we must find peace through strength.”
Ronald Reagan, 1983


Janet

+++++++++++++++

Chavez: Bush 'devil'; U.S. 'on the way down'
POSTED: 1726 GMT (0126 HKT), September 21, 2006


http://edition.cnn.com/2006/WORLD/americas/09/20/chavez.un/index.html




Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #797 1/30/09 -
Post by: 2NJSons_Mom on January 30, 2009, 09:27:55 PM
Lifesong,

I'd have to search for the post by someone (maybe Janet?) in the past day.  I know it was in December and Tim said Schaefer called Dave while Tim was at Schaefer's house a couple weeks prior.  So it would be November...the year, though I won't say because I am not positive at the moment.  Hope Janet has it...or I'll look in a bit.  I'm running back & forth, here. 


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #797 1/30/09 -
Post by: Lifesong on January 30, 2009, 09:30:18 PM
FWIW... I never believed Kyle's account of the Panter,
even when I believed the search was legit.
It never made sense to me.  I don't think he could see
the area off of Arishi Beach from the hotel area.
To me it always seemed like he told that story to
cover for something else.


Funny, I thought the same thing when I read Caps' reference to John Silvetti's mention of the Panther being over the cage in a post earlier today.  I thought it could have been made up to strengthen the "post office" story.



Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #797 1/30/09 -
Post by: Tamikosmom on January 30, 2009, 09:34:13 PM
As Beth Holloway would said ... "Greta ... this is huge!"

In the following Tim Miller/Greta interview ... Tim states that Louis Schaefer and John Silvetti contacted him regarding the undertaking.

 ... and Tim states to Jamie Colby of FOX at the end of February that Schaefer contacted Dave Holloway two months previous while Tim Miller was at his home.

I am distracted at the moment ... maybe somebody could listen to the following video.  Maybe Tim Miller gives an indication when he was first contacted by Shaefer and Silvetti.

Janet

++++++

Natalee Holloway: Tim Miller of Texas EquuSearch Discusses Crab Trap, Clothing and DNA Found in Waters of Aruba
February 27, 2005 2008


"I've been trying to put this together for two and a half years...Louis Schaefer came forward with John Silvetti."
(transcript credit: texasmom)

Video:
http://scaredmonkeys.com/2008/02/27/natalee-holloway-tim-miller-of-texas-equusearch-discusses-crab-trap-clothing-and-dna-found-in-waters-of-aruba/


FOX ONLINE - JAMIE COLBY
July 15, 2007


COLBY:  Tim, why are they (Arubans) standing in your way?

MILLER: I don't think they can stand in our way. With the equipment we got and if we have to go in off of Venezuela. Whereever we need to go into, we've got the equipment. In fact they are more than welcome to be on the ship with us. The ships that we are taking over are a 265 foot ship and a 340 foot ship which have all the latest technology on it. In fact the owner of this company, Louis Shaeffer of Superior Offshore International, Louis called Dave Holloway up about two months ago when I was at Louis' house. He said "Mr Holloway, I'm going to promise you something, if your daughter is in a metal container out there in that water, we are going to bring her home."


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #797 1/30/09 -
Post by: Magnolia on January 30, 2009, 09:35:02 PM
FWIW... I never believed Kyle's account of the Panter,
even when I believed the search was legit.
It never made sense to me.  I don't think he could see
the area off of Arishi Beach from the hotel area.
To me it always seemed like he told that story to
cover for something else.


Funny, I thought the same thing when I read Caps' reference to John Silvetti's mention of the Panther being over the cage in a post earlier today.  I thought it could have been made up to strengthen the "post office" story.



I never believed the post office theory either.  Too complicated.
That cage wouldn't hold enough drugs to make all of the effort of
waterproofing the drugs and diving to put them in and diving again
to get them out worthwhile.  That was a CapsLockWizzard lie.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #797 1/30/09 -
Post by: Lifesong on January 30, 2009, 09:36:09 PM
Thanks, Janet.  I'm going to watch it now.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #797 1/30/09 -
Post by: sharon on January 30, 2009, 09:39:05 PM
Maybe the site that the Panther was anchored gave away the location of the crab/trap.

Janet

++++++++


CAPSLOCKWIZARD - IN HIS OWN WORDS

CAPS:
  “Yes, We (John Silvetti) did have the meeting today. It was a long meeting and we are all set to start the process of a permit to drain. Witness will gave statement to Lawyer (Helen), Lawyer will motion to drain the pond to OM. If Motion denied, will go to media and expose more dirt. John knows everything now and he will stay behind to help and protect. John state the cage was empty. it was full of these broken plastic bags that shows on the cam like skull, but he said to me it is the water doing tricks when picture was taken. He thinks also it is a postoffice. When I told him the story about the cage, he also understand now some things that he could not have question about. Like why is the Panter allways parked over the spot while there is notting anymore in he cage. The meeting end at 5:00 pm and was very good. About the Pipes. They will be checked. Also John thinks that the signs are there but need to drain the pond. Also Withness is 99% it was some one that came from the pond area that he saw, because it looks like a dutch man and was cover in mud from the chest down.”

CAPS:  Another thing , I went to dive a week a go to the same location, and the Cage is still there. If the cage was evidance in a murder case, why is it still in the water

Hi Janet!

You hitting that tea, again?

I am not a scuba diver -- or boat captain -- so I can only go on what I've been told. (If any on here are either -- please contribute your experience).

I was told that unless you took the picture ( knowing where it was taken from) it would be difficult to calibrate an exact location, although general approximate would be feasable if you had proper tools (I haven't the foggiest what that equates to)

I have spoken to several who 'casually dive' -- most said unless it was a 'marked' spot or a boat that had equipment that sees the bottom -- they would not make a 90' dive. Apparently they save that for wrecks and walls (who knows?) They would certainly not attempt it for an uncertain target, because apparently there are extra issues when you are at 90 ft. I remember one of the woman's story -- because I witnessed the afters -- the black eyes she had for 3 months as a result of breaking the suction when she took off her mask. 90 ft of water - Cayman Brac.

So at the very least...CAPS is a boat captain, knows a  boat captain, owns a boat, knows someone who owns a boat, is an experienced scuba diver, knows an experienced diver, and possibly owns or knows people who own equipment that could calibrate a distance from picture in the newspaper, or boat equipment that can see objects 90 ft below

Or CAPS took the picture for the newspaper so he knew the 'from' spot.

Or someone gave CAPS the coordinates -- combined with a few items above. You would still need a boat. I doubt anyone would start out from the beach. :-)

moo

I still think it's hinky. :oops:

I think I need your tea  ::MonkeyWink::

hugs

night night


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #797 1/30/09 -
Post by: ldstlou on January 30, 2009, 09:46:04 PM
Kermit never said the email from Lala's was addressesd to him or sent directy from her to him.

Kermit never said the email from Lala's was addressesd to him or sent directy from her to him.

Kermit never said the email from Lala's was addressesd to him or sent directy from her to him.




Jug does know. He may just not be informing Idstlou
Re: Natalee Case Discussion #793 1/13/09
January 17, 2009, 06:21:44 PM »
Kermit ... who is "I".
/http://scaredmonkeys.net/index.php?topic=4371.660
XXXX:  Sat Nov 22, 2008 8:10 am    Post subject:    Reply with quote
Here is a snippet from an email I rec'd from Lalas.
I asked Jug about Schaeffer...he is the oil guy. He was the one that provided the cash to get down there. Silvetti knew he would get more business from Schaeffer if he mapped....while they were looking...the ocean floor. All the crew was asked to do was look for Natalee or anything suspicious as in small things like a cage or bones or whatever.
They do a large mapping process while they are looking for the details. Schaeffer would use the large mapping of the general layout of the ocean floor to further look for oil...etc...while they looked for Natalee too.

Silvetti was the one that offered to look for Natalee and not Schaefer


She did so Ana


(http://img136.imageshack.us/img136/8025/idstlouda0.jpg)





I think that ldstlou has a reading comprehension problem.
She only comprehends what she believes.
No matter how one tries to explain to her ...she will not
accept the answers.
   I think she is a hopeless case.

You are correct Magnolia.

or maybe I just copied the wrong post...dear lawdy

How about this one?

Quote
71   Natalee Holloway / Natalee Holloway / Re: Natalee Case Discussion #795 1/23/09 -  on: January 27, 2009, 12:35:23 AM 
oceanexploration
I haven't seen Kermit post anything untrue presented as factual.
http://scaredmonkeys.net/index.php?topic=4153.660



Sat Nov 22, 2008
Here is a snippet from an email I rec'd from Lalas.

I asked Jug about Schaeffer...he is the oil guy. He was the one that provided the cash to get down there. Silvetti knew he would get more business from Schaeffer if he mapped....while they were looking...the ocean floor. All the crew was asked to do was look for Natalee or anything suspicious as in small things like a cage or bones or whatever.
They do a large mapping process while they are looking for the details. Schaeffer would use the large mapping of the general layout of the ocean floor to further look for oil...etc...while they looked for Natalee too.

Silvetti was the one that offered to look for Natalee and not Schaefer.



Isdtlou
So now you're trying to tell us that Jug Twitty lied to lalasmom or was it lalasmom lying to her friends?
 


I am still waiting for the answer to my question too...am I the only one that got the impression that Kermit was implying she worked for the Secret Service...of course it could just be that reading comprehension problem I have too. lol

I saw pics posted here by Kermit that lead me to believe she worked for the Secret Service or possibly FBI. I also saw posts of Monkeys thanking her for her service to our country. To me it is about credibility...so am I allowed to ask if Kermit worked for the Secret Service or am I the only one that even assumed so?

What the hey...going to get bashed anyways...so did Kermit work for the Secret Service as she implied or not? It sure would help me a lot in regards to credibility if I knew I was not mislead about this issue.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #797 1/30/09 -
Post by: San on January 30, 2009, 09:54:52 PM

I am still waiting for the answer to my question too...am I the only one that got the impression that Kermit was implying she worked for the Secret Service...of course it could just be that reading comprehension problem I have too. lol

I saw pics posted here by Kermit that lead me to believe she worked for the Secret Service or possibly FBI. I also saw posts of Monkeys thanking her for her service to our country. To me it is about credibility...so am I allowed to ask if Kermit worked for the Secret Service or am I the only one that even assumed so?

What the hey...going to get bashed anyways...so did Kermit work for the Secret Service as she implied or not? It sure would help me a lot in regards to credibility if I knew I was not mislead about this issue.

Just because Kermit did not reveal what she did for a living is not my problem.  You got the impression and assumed she did.  She doesn't have to say what she does for a living for me to believe her.  I don't know what Kermit does for a living and I don't want to know what Kermit does for a living.

Credibility?  Ask the person who is probably emailing you as we speak about that word.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #797 1/30/09 -
Post by: Monkey Mia on January 30, 2009, 09:55:26 PM
Those drivebys sure leave you with a cold chill.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #797 1/30/09 -
Post by: Tamikosmom on January 30, 2009, 09:56:20 PM
Maybe the site that the Panther was anchored gave away the location of the crab/trap.

Janet

++++++++


CAPSLOCKWIZARD - IN HIS OWN WORDS

CAPS:
  “Yes, We (John Silvetti) did have the meeting today. It was a long meeting and we are all set to start the process of a permit to drain. Witness will gave statement to Lawyer (Helen), Lawyer will motion to drain the pond to OM. If Motion denied, will go to media and expose more dirt. John knows everything now and he will stay behind to help and protect. John state the cage was empty. it was full of these broken plastic bags that shows on the cam like skull, but he said to me it is the water doing tricks when picture was taken. He thinks also it is a postoffice. When I told him the story about the cage, he also understand now some things that he could not have question about. Like why is the Panter allways parked over the spot while there is notting anymore in he cage. The meeting end at 5:00 pm and was very good. About the Pipes. They will be checked. Also John thinks that the signs are there but need to drain the pond. Also Withness is 99% it was some one that came from the pond area that he saw, because it looks like a dutch man and was cover in mud from the chest down.”

CAPS:  Another thing , I went to dive a week a go to the same location, and the Cage is still there. If the cage was evidance in a murder case, why is it still in the water

Hi Janet!

You hitting that tea, again?

I am not a scuba diver -- or boat captain -- so I can only go on what I've been told. (If any on here are either -- please contribute your experience).

I was told that unless you took the picture ( knowing where it was taken from) it would be difficult to calibrate an exact location, although general approximate would be feasable if you had proper tools (I haven't the foggiest what that equates to)

I have spoken to several who 'casually dive' -- most said unless it was a 'marked' spot or a boat that had equipment that sees the bottom -- they would not make a 90' dive. Apparently they save that for wrecks and walls (who knows?) They would certainly not attempt it for an uncertain target, because apparently there are extra issues when you are at 90 ft. I remember one of the woman's story -- because I witnessed the afters -- the black eyes she had for 3 months as a result of breaking the suction when she took off her mask. 90 ft of water - Cayman Brac.

So at the very least...CAPS is a boat captain, knows a  boat captain, owns a boat, knows someone who owns a boat, is an experienced scuba diver, knows an experienced diver, and possibly owns or knows people who own equipment that could calibrate a distance from picture in the newspaper, or boat equipment that can see objects 90 ft below

Or CAPS took the picture for the newspaper so he knew the 'from' spot.

Or someone gave CAPS the coordinates -- combined with a few items above. You would still need a boat. I doubt anyone would start out from the beach. :-)

moo

I still think it's hinky. :oops:

I think I need your tea  ::MonkeyWink::

hugs

night night

CAPS is soooo involved in the John Silvette betrayal of the family of Natalee Holloway.

IMO.

Hugs to you too Sharon.

Special thanks to you, jen, Wingnut and Kermit for your faithfulness in keeping on.

JUSTICE FOR NATALEE HOLLOWAY!

Janet


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #797 1/30/09 -
Post by: San on January 30, 2009, 09:56:29 PM
All I have been asking for all along is show me the proof.  Prove to us that Kermit is lying.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #797 1/30/09 -
Post by: wreck on January 30, 2009, 09:56:46 PM
Lisa,
FORGET anything about Kermit's "credibility" for just ONE minute. Pretend it did not come from Kermit.
Just look at what KYLE has said (as verified form everyone ELSE at freebirds). Just READ what KYLE said.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #797 1/30/09 -
Post by: Blue Moon on January 30, 2009, 09:58:18 PM
Those drivebys sure leave you with a cold chill.

You got that right.   Welcome.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #797 1/30/09 -
Post by: Tamikosmom on January 30, 2009, 09:58:28 PM

I am still waiting for the answer to my question too...am I the only one that got the impression that Kermit was implying she worked for the Secret Service...of course it could just be that reading comprehension problem I have too. lol

I saw pics posted here by Kermit that lead me to believe she worked for the Secret Service or possibly FBI. I also saw posts of Monkeys thanking her for her service to our country. To me it is about credibility...so am I allowed to ask if Kermit worked for the Secret Service or am I the only one that even assumed so?

What the hey...going to get bashed anyways...so did Kermit work for the Secret Service as she implied or not? It sure would help me a lot in regards to credibility if I knew I was not mislead about this issue.

OFF TOPIC

KLAAAAAS!!

Janet


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #797 1/30/09 -
Post by: San on January 30, 2009, 09:58:49 PM
Those drivebys sure leave you with a cold chill.

Welcome Monkey Mia.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #797 1/30/09 -
Post by: Lifesong on January 30, 2009, 09:59:18 PM

Quote
Sat Nov 22, 2008
Here is a snippet from an email I rec'd from Lalas.
[/color]


ldstlou,

Let's assume you are correct and Kermit outright lied in the above example.  Let's also assume that Kermit outright falsely claimed to be a Secret Service agent.

Hypothetically, let's say everyone concedes these two points to you.

The information Kermit has posted has still not been refuted.  Please, let's move forward from that point.

Go ahead and refute the information.

I'm all ears.




Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #797 1/30/09 -
Post by: klaasend on January 30, 2009, 10:00:08 PM
Those drivebys sure leave you with a cold chill.

Welcome Monkey Mia!

(http://i118.photobucket.com/albums/o100/klaasen3/Sub5/MonkeyDriveBy.gif)


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #797 1/30/09 -
Post by: 2NJSons_Mom on January 30, 2009, 10:00:28 PM
As Beth Holloway would said ... "Greta ... this is huge!"

In the following Tim Miller/Greta interview ... Tim states that Louis Schaefer and John Silvetti contacted him regarding the undertaking.

 ... and Tim states to Jamie Colby of FOX at the end of February that Schaefer contacted Dave Holloway two months previous while Tim Miller was at his home.

I am distracted at the moment ... maybe somebody could listen to the following video.  Maybe Tim Miller gives an indication when he was first contacted by Shaefer and Silvetti.

Janet

++++++

Natalee Holloway: Tim Miller of Texas EquuSearch Discusses Crab Trap, Clothing and DNA Found in Waters of Aruba
February 27, 2005 2008


"I've been trying to put this together for two and a half years...Louis Schaefer came forward with John Silvetti."
(transcript credit: texasmom)

Video:
http://scaredmonkeys.com/2008/02/27/natalee-holloway-tim-miller-of-texas-equusearch-discusses-crab-trap-clothing-and-dna-found-in-waters-of-aruba/


FOX ONLINE - JAMIE COLBY
July 15, 2007


COLBY:  Tim, why are they (Arubans) standing in your way?

MILLER: I don't think they can stand in our way. With the equipment we got and if we have to go in off of Venezuela. Whereever we need to go into, we've got the equipment. In fact they are more than welcome to be on the ship with us. The ships that we are taking over are a 265 foot ship and a 340 foot ship which have all the latest technology on it. In fact the owner of this company, Louis Shaeffer of Superior Offshore International, Louis called Dave Holloway up about two months ago when I was at Louis' house. He said "Mr Holloway, I'm going to promise you something, if your daughter is in a metal container out there in that water, we are going to bring her home."


Thanks, Janet...I had my months wrong in my response to Lifesong....you came to the rescue.  (((Hugs)))   Yes, I'm a girl monkey.   ::MonkeyHaHa::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #797 1/30/09 -
Post by: Blue Moon on January 30, 2009, 10:01:07 PM
Those drivebys sure leave you with a cold chill.

Welcome Monkey Mia!

(http://i118.photobucket.com/albums/o100/klaasen3/Sub5/MonkeyDriveBy.gif)

Klaas, like the drive by but last night I was on a tear about Mos and his "purse" and you did not put it up.  I was disappointed. 


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #797 1/30/09 -
Post by: ldstlou on January 30, 2009, 10:01:18 PM

I am still waiting for the answer to my question too...am I the only one that got the impression that Kermit was implying she worked for the Secret Service...of course it could just be that reading comprehension problem I have too. lol

I saw pics posted here by Kermit that lead me to believe she worked for the Secret Service or possibly FBI. I also saw posts of Monkeys thanking her for her service to our country. To me it is about credibility...so am I allowed to ask if Kermit worked for the Secret Service or am I the only one that even assumed so?

What the hey...going to get bashed anyways...so did Kermit work for the Secret Service as she implied or not? It sure would help me a lot in regards to credibility if I knew I was not mislead about this issue.

Just because Kermit did not reveal what she did for a living is not my problem.  You got the impression and assumed she did.  She doesn't have to say what she does for a living for me to believe her.  I don't know what Kermit does for a living and I don't want to know what Kermit does for a living.

Credibility?  Ask the person who is probably emailing you as we speak about that word.

I am not a puppet and no one is e-mailing me.
I am simply asking a question. I know I am not the only one who thought she was Secret Service. What is the big deal? You post pics of yourself at Presidential funerals and events...I would say that is giving the impression she is Secret Service. Dear lawdy..I said apparently other Monkeys know her and trust her and I am trying to figure it all out..I think it is a fair question.

So is Kermit Secret Service as most would assume from the pics or not?

And I am not running away...have a bunch of 8 year olds here and trying to get ready for the protest so forgive me as I come and go!


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #797 1/30/09 -
Post by: Monkey Mia on January 30, 2009, 10:02:12 PM
Thank you Blue Moon and San.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #797 1/30/09 -
Post by: Monkey Mia on January 30, 2009, 10:03:32 PM
Thank you klaasend.  Glad to be here.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #797 1/30/09 -
Post by: ldstlou on January 30, 2009, 10:04:09 PM

Quote
Sat Nov 22, 2008
Here is a snippet from an email I rec'd from Lalas.
[/color]


ldstlou,

Let's assume you are correct and Kermit outright lied in the above example.  Let's also assume that Kermit outright falsely claimed to be a Secret Service agent.

Hypothetically, let's say everyone concedes these two points to you.

The information Kermit has posted has still not been refuted.  Please, let's move forward from that point.

Go ahead and refute the information.

I'm all ears.




ok...then I am back where I started when this all started. I have two differing views on what happened and I am trying to discern the truth...credibility seems important to me.
I need to trust the messenger to trust the message.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #797 1/30/09 -
Post by: Tamikosmom on January 30, 2009, 10:05:05 PM
As Beth Holloway would said ... "Greta ... this is huge!"

In the following Tim Miller/Greta interview ... Tim states that Louis Schaefer and John Silvetti contacted him regarding the undertaking.

 ... and Tim states to Jamie Colby of FOX at the end of February that Schaefer contacted Dave Holloway two months previous while Tim Miller was at his home.

I am distracted at the moment ... maybe somebody could listen to the following video.  Maybe Tim Miller gives an indication when he was first contacted by Shaefer and Silvetti.

Janet

++++++

Natalee Holloway: Tim Miller of Texas EquuSearch Discusses Crab Trap, Clothing and DNA Found in Waters of Aruba
February 27, 2005 2008


"I've been trying to put this together for two and a half years...Louis Schaefer came forward with John Silvetti."
(transcript credit: texasmom)

Video:
http://scaredmonkeys.com/2008/02/27/natalee-holloway-tim-miller-of-texas-equusearch-discusses-crab-trap-clothing-and-dna-found-in-waters-of-aruba/


FOX ONLINE - JAMIE COLBY
July 15, 2007


COLBY:  Tim, why are they (Arubans) standing in your way?

MILLER: I don't think they can stand in our way. With the equipment we got and if we have to go in off of Venezuela. Whereever we need to go into, we've got the equipment. In fact they are more than welcome to be on the ship with us. The ships that we are taking over are a 265 foot ship and a 340 foot ship which have all the latest technology on it. In fact the owner of this company, Louis Shaeffer of Superior Offshore International, Louis called Dave Holloway up about two months ago when I was at Louis' house. He said "Mr Holloway, I'm going to promise you something, if your daughter is in a metal container out there in that water, we are going to bring her home."


Thanks, Janet...I had my months wrong in my response to Lifesong....you came to the rescue.  (((Hugs)))   Yes, I'm a girl monkey.   ::MonkeyHaHa::

WHEW!!!

Janet


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #797 1/30/09 -
Post by: wreck on January 30, 2009, 10:05:24 PM

I am still waiting for the answer to my question too...am I the only one that got the impression that Kermit was implying she worked for the Secret Service...of course it could just be that reading comprehension problem I have too. lol

I saw pics posted here by Kermit that lead me to believe she worked for the Secret Service or possibly FBI. I also saw posts of Monkeys thanking her for her service to our country. To me it is about credibility...so am I allowed to ask if Kermit worked for the Secret Service or am I the only one that even assumed so?

What the hey...going to get bashed anyways...so did Kermit work for the Secret Service as she implied or not? It sure would help me a lot in regards to credibility if I knew I was not mislead about this issue.

Just because Kermit did not reveal what she did for a living is not my problem.  You got the impression and assumed she did.  She doesn't have to say what she does for a living for me to believe her.  I don't know what Kermit does for a living and I don't want to know what Kermit does for a living.

Credibility?  Ask the person who is probably emailing you as we speak about that word.

I am not a puppet and no one is e-mailing me.
I am simply asking a question. I know I am not the only one who thought she was Secret Service. What is the big deal? You post pics of yourself at Presidential funerals and events...I would say that is giving the impression she is Secret Service. Dear lawdy..I said apparently other Monkeys know her and trust her and I am trying to figure it all out..I think it is a fair question.

So is Kermit Secret Service as most would assume from the pics or not?

And I am not running away...have a bunch of 8 year olds here and trying to get ready for the protest so forgive me as I come and go!
I'm through with you. If you won't answer our questions -- don't expect an answer from me. Your only causing a distraction.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #797 1/30/09 -
Post by: Blue Moon on January 30, 2009, 10:06:51 PM
I have to agree with LifeSong.  Let's forget Kermit for a minute and focus on the words spoken by Kyle.  How would you explain his "words" concerning Natalee? We have no idea if that was her remains or someone else's remains because the Persistence decided to just let AOE take possession of the contents of the cage.  Said it was remains, they tested fabric for DNA.  If it wasn't her remains so be it.  BUT it was someone's family member in that cage be it Natalee or some other poor soul.  That family would deserve to know where their loved one was the same as Natalee's family.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #797 1/30/09 -
Post by: 2NJSons_Mom on January 30, 2009, 10:07:37 PM
Those drivebys sure leave you with a cold chill.

What an entrance!.....Welcome, Monkey Mia.  Keep a blanket handy.   ::MonkeyHaHa::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #797 1/30/09 -
Post by: wreck on January 30, 2009, 10:07:45 PM

Quote
Sat Nov 22, 2008
Here is a snippet from an email I rec'd from Lalas.
[/color]


ldstlou,

Let's assume you are correct and Kermit outright lied in the above example.  Let's also assume that Kermit outright falsely claimed to be a Secret Service agent.

Hypothetically, let's say everyone concedes these two points to you.

The information Kermit has posted has still not been refuted.  Please, let's move forward from that point.

Go ahead and refute the information.

I'm all ears.




ok...then I am back where I started when this all started. I have two differing views on what happened and I am trying to discern the truth...credibility seems important to me.
I need to trust the messenger to trust the message.
Kermit is not the only "messenger".


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #797 1/30/09 -
Post by: ldstlou on January 30, 2009, 10:08:03 PM

I am still waiting for the answer to my question too...am I the only one that got the impression that Kermit was implying she worked for the Secret Service...of course it could just be that reading comprehension problem I have too. lol

I saw pics posted here by Kermit that lead me to believe she worked for the Secret Service or possibly FBI. I also saw posts of Monkeys thanking her for her service to our country. To me it is about credibility...so am I allowed to ask if Kermit worked for the Secret Service or am I the only one that even assumed so?

What the hey...going to get bashed anyways...so did Kermit work for the Secret Service as she implied or not? It sure would help me a lot in regards to credibility if I knew I was not mislead about this issue.

Just because Kermit did not reveal what she did for a living is not my problem.  You got the impression and assumed she did.  She doesn't have to say what she does for a living for me to believe her.  I don't know what Kermit does for a living and I don't want to know what Kermit does for a living.

Credibility?  Ask the person who is probably emailing you as we speak about that word.

I am not a puppet and no one is e-mailing me.
I am simply asking a question. I know I am not the only one who thought she was Secret Service. What is the big deal? You post pics of yourself at Presidential funerals and events...I would say that is giving the impression she is Secret Service. Dear lawdy..I said apparently other Monkeys know her and trust her and I am trying to figure it all out..I think it is a fair question.

So is Kermit Secret Service as most would assume from the pics or not?

And I am not running away...have a bunch of 8 year olds here and trying to get ready for the protest so forgive me as I come and go!
I'm through with you. If you won't answer our questions -- don't expect an answer from me. Your only causing a distraction.

What didn't I answer? I thought I had been grilled thru and thru ..lol


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #797 1/30/09 -
Post by: klaasend on January 30, 2009, 10:08:10 PM
Those drivebys sure leave you with a cold chill.

Welcome Monkey Mia!

(http://i118.photobucket.com/albums/o100/klaasen3/Sub5/MonkeyDriveBy.gif)

Klaas, like the drive by but last night I was on a tear about Mos and his "purse" and you did not put it up.  I was disappointed. 

(http://i118.photobucket.com/albums/o100/klaasen3/Sub5/MosHansOM1-1.jpg)


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #797 1/30/09 -
Post by: Lifesong on January 30, 2009, 10:09:03 PM

Quote
Sat Nov 22, 2008
Here is a snippet from an email I rec'd from Lalas.
[/color]


ldstlou,

Let's assume you are correct and Kermit outright lied in the above example.  Let's also assume that Kermit outright falsely claimed to be a Secret Service agent.

Hypothetically, let's say everyone concedes these two points to you.

The information Kermit has posted has still not been refuted.  Please, let's move forward from that point.

Go ahead and refute the information.

I'm all ears.


ok...then I am back where I started when this all started. I have two differing views on what happened and I am trying to discern the truth...credibility seems important to me.
I need to trust the messenger to trust the message.


I'm interested in hearing your two differing views if you're open to sharing them.



Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #797 1/30/09 -
Post by: San on January 30, 2009, 10:09:39 PM

I am still waiting for the answer to my question too...am I the only one that got the impression that Kermit was implying she worked for the Secret Service...of course it could just be that reading comprehension problem I have too. lol

I saw pics posted here by Kermit that lead me to believe she worked for the Secret Service or possibly FBI. I also saw posts of Monkeys thanking her for her service to our country. To me it is about credibility...so am I allowed to ask if Kermit worked for the Secret Service or am I the only one that even assumed so?

What the hey...going to get bashed anyways...so did Kermit work for the Secret Service as she implied or not? It sure would help me a lot in regards to credibility if I knew I was not mislead about this issue.

Just because Kermit did not reveal what she did for a living is not my problem.  You got the impression and assumed she did.  She doesn't have to say what she does for a living for me to believe her.  I don't know what Kermit does for a living and I don't want to know what Kermit does for a living.

Credibility?  Ask the person who is probably emailing you as we speak about that word.

I am not a puppet and no one is e-mailing me.
I am simply asking a question. I know I am not the only one who thought she was Secret Service. What is the big deal? You post pics of yourself at Presidential funerals and events...I would say that is giving the impression she is Secret Service. Dear lawdy..I said apparently other Monkeys know her and trust her and I am trying to figure it all out..I think it is a fair question.

So is Kermit Secret Service as most would assume from the pics or not?

And I am not running away...have a bunch of 8 year olds here and trying to get ready for the protest so forgive me as I come and go!

It isn't a big deal to me whether she is or isn't SS.  I have always believed what Kermit wrote before she even posted those photos that made you think she was.  I based my opinion on what she has shown us from another person's words he wrote.  I made my mind up that Kyle is a liar.  Not because of Kermits occupation but because of the proof she has shown us.

Once again show us the proof.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #797 1/30/09 -
Post by: Blue Moon on January 30, 2009, 10:10:22 PM
Those drivebys sure leave you with a cold chill.

Welcome Monkey Mia!

(http://i118.photobucket.com/albums/o100/klaasen3/Sub5/MonkeyDriveBy.gif)

Klaas, like the drive by but last night I was on a tear about Mos and his "purse" and you did not put it up.  I was disappointed. 

(http://i118.photobucket.com/albums/o100/klaasen3/Sub5/MosHansOM1-1.jpg)

That pansy.  ::MonkeyLaugh:: ::MonkeyLaugh::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #797 1/30/09 -
Post by: Lifesong on January 30, 2009, 10:10:36 PM
Those drivebys sure leave you with a cold chill.

What an entrance!.....Welcome, Monkey Mia.  Keep a blanket handy.   ::MonkeyHaHa::

That's what I was thinking!

Nice open, MonkeyMia, glad you're here.  ::MonkeyWink::



Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #797 1/30/09 -
Post by: Magnolia on January 30, 2009, 10:10:38 PM

Quote
Sat Nov 22, 2008
Here is a snippet from an email I rec'd from Lalas.
[/color]


ldstlou,

Let's assume you are correct and Kermit outright lied in the above example.  Let's also assume that Kermit outright falsely claimed to be a Secret Service agent.

Hypothetically, let's say everyone concedes these two points to you.

The information Kermit has posted has still not been refuted.  Please, let's move forward from that point.

Go ahead and refute the information.

I'm all ears.




ok...then I am back where I started when this all started. I have two differing views on what happened and I am trying to discern the truth...credibility seems important to me.
I need to trust the messenger to trust the message.

At least six of the Freebirds have been here to confirm all that
Kermit has posted.  I find them far more credible than your sources.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #797 1/30/09 -
Post by: ldstlou on January 30, 2009, 10:10:50 PM

Quote
Sat Nov 22, 2008
Here is a snippet from an email I rec'd from Lalas.
[/color]


ldstlou,

Let's assume you are correct and Kermit outright lied in the above example.  Let's also assume that Kermit outright falsely claimed to be a Secret Service agent.

Hypothetically, let's say everyone concedes these two points to you.

The information Kermit has posted has still not been refuted.  Please, let's move forward from that point.

Go ahead and refute the information.

I'm all ears.




ok...then I am back where I started when this all started. I have two differing views on what happened and I am trying to discern the truth...credibility seems important to me.
I need to trust the messenger to trust the message.
Kermit is not the only "messenger".

Wreck, most of you here trust Kermit implicitly, I don't know her. I see pics that make me assume she is Secret Service and that would hold a lot of weight for me...I am very patriotic. I am just asking if it was fair of me to make the assumption based on what I saw and read and if it is true. That would definately go a long way for me.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #797 1/30/09 -
Post by: hotping on January 30, 2009, 10:11:48 PM

Quote
Sat Nov 22, 2008
Here is a snippet from an email I rec'd from Lalas.
[/color]


ldstlou,

Let's assume you are correct and Kermit outright lied in the above example.  Let's also assume that Kermit outright falsely claimed to be a Secret Service agent.

Hypothetically, let's say everyone concedes these two points to you.

The information Kermit has posted has still not been refuted.  Please, let's move forward from that point.

Go ahead and refute the information.

I'm all ears.




ok...then I am back where I started when this all started. I have two differing views on what happened and I am trying to discern the truth...credibility seems important to me.
I need to trust the messenger to trust the message.
Lisa.This is a forum that people use nicknames and no one knows what each Monkey does for a living or who they really are..So You are saying that You don't trust anyone or their message unless You know their occupation..That's just plain stupid and if that's the way You feel You should not be on a public forum period..JMOO And no I'm not bashing You!


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #797 1/30/09 -
Post by: Monkey Mia on January 30, 2009, 10:12:54 PM
Thank you 2NJsons mom.

ldstlou, it is no ones business what kermit does.  And for the record, even for a newbie it was easy to keep the leak's email straight. 


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #797 1/30/09 -
Post by: ldstlou on January 30, 2009, 10:13:32 PM

I am still waiting for the answer to my question too...am I the only one that got the impression that Kermit was implying she worked for the Secret Service...of course it could just be that reading comprehension problem I have too. lol

I saw pics posted here by Kermit that lead me to believe she worked for the Secret Service or possibly FBI. I also saw posts of Monkeys thanking her for her service to our country. To me it is about credibility...so am I allowed to ask if Kermit worked for the Secret Service or am I the only one that even assumed so?

What the hey...going to get bashed anyways...so did Kermit work for the Secret Service as she implied or not? It sure would help me a lot in regards to credibility if I knew I was not mislead about this issue.

Just because Kermit did not reveal what she did for a living is not my problem.  You got the impression and assumed she did.  She doesn't have to say what she does for a living for me to believe her.  I don't know what Kermit does for a living and I don't want to know what Kermit does for a living.

Credibility?  Ask the person who is probably emailing you as we speak about that word.

I am not a puppet and no one is e-mailing me.
I am simply asking a question. I know I am not the only one who thought she was Secret Service. What is the big deal? You post pics of yourself at Presidential funerals and events...I would say that is giving the impression she is Secret Service. Dear lawdy..I said apparently other Monkeys know her and trust her and I am trying to figure it all out..I think it is a fair question.

So is Kermit Secret Service as most would assume from the pics or not?

And I am not running away...have a bunch of 8 year olds here and trying to get ready for the protest so forgive me as I come and go!

It isn't a big deal to me whether she is or isn't SS.  I have always believed what Kermit wrote before she even posted those photos that made you think she was.  I based my opinion on what she has shown us from another person's words he wrote.  I made my mind up that Kyle is a liar.  Not because of Kermits occupation but because of the proof she has shown us.

Once again show us the proof.

I don't know her like you do San, I am sorry I don't. So I have to discern from what she posts. If I was lead to believe she was Secret Service and she is not, I just can't be sold on her story vs what I have been told by other people.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #797 1/30/09 -
Post by: Monkey Mia on January 30, 2009, 10:15:15 PM
Thank you Lifesong.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #797 1/30/09 -
Post by: 2NJSons_Mom on January 30, 2009, 10:15:37 PM
Kermit never said the email from Lala's was addressesd to him or sent directy from her to him.

Kermit never said the email from Lala's was addressesd to him or sent directy from her to him.

Kermit never said the email from Lala's was addressesd to him or sent directy from her to him.




Jug does know. He may just not be informing Idstlou
Re: Natalee Case Discussion #793 1/13/09
January 17, 2009, 06:21:44 PM »
Kermit ... who is "I".
/http://scaredmonkeys.net/index.php?topic=4371.660
XXXX:  Sat Nov 22, 2008 8:10 am    Post subject:    Reply with quote
Here is a snippet from an email I rec'd from Lalas.
I asked Jug about Schaeffer...he is the oil guy. He was the one that provided the cash to get down there. Silvetti knew he would get more business from Schaeffer if he mapped....while they were looking...the ocean floor. All the crew was asked to do was look for Natalee or anything suspicious as in small things like a cage or bones or whatever.
They do a large mapping process while they are looking for the details. Schaeffer would use the large mapping of the general layout of the ocean floor to further look for oil...etc...while they looked for Natalee too.

Silvetti was the one that offered to look for Natalee and not Schaefer


She did so Ana


(http://img136.imageshack.us/img136/8025/idstlouda0.jpg)





I think that ldstlou has a reading comprehension problem.
She only comprehends what she believes.
No matter how one tries to explain to her ...she will not
accept the answers.
   I think she is a hopeless case.

You are correct Magnolia.

or maybe I just copied the wrong post...dear lawdy

How about this one?

Quote
71   Natalee Holloway / Natalee Holloway / Re: Natalee Case Discussion #795 1/23/09 -  on: January 27, 2009, 12:35:23 AM 
oceanexploration
I haven't seen Kermit post anything untrue presented as factual.
http://scaredmonkeys.net/index.php?topic=4153.660



Sat Nov 22, 2008
Here is a snippet from an email I rec'd from Lalas.

I asked Jug about Schaeffer...he is the oil guy. He was the one that provided the cash to get down there. Silvetti knew he would get more business from Schaeffer if he mapped....while they were looking...the ocean floor. All the crew was asked to do was look for Natalee or anything suspicious as in small things like a cage or bones or whatever.
They do a large mapping process while they are looking for the details. Schaeffer would use the large mapping of the general layout of the ocean floor to further look for oil...etc...while they looked for Natalee too.

Silvetti was the one that offered to look for Natalee and not Schaefer.



Isdtlou
So now you're trying to tell us that Jug Twitty lied to lalasmom or was it lalasmom lying to her friends?
 


I am still waiting for the answer to my question too...am I the only one that got the impression that Kermit was implying she worked for the Secret Service...of course it could just be that reading comprehension problem I have too. lol

I saw pics posted here by Kermit that lead me to believe she worked for the Secret Service or possibly FBI. I also saw posts of Monkeys thanking her for her service to our country. To me it is about credibility...so am I allowed to ask if Kermit worked for the Secret Service or am I the only one that even assumed so?

What the hey...going to get bashed anyways...so did Kermit work for the Secret Service as she implied or not? It sure would help me a lot in regards to credibility if I knew I was not mislead about this issue.

I forward many emails to my family & friends...they can say they got it from me, but I didn't compose it. 




Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #797 1/30/09 -
Post by: wreck on January 30, 2009, 10:16:10 PM

Quote
Sat Nov 22, 2008
Here is a snippet from an email I rec'd from Lalas.
[/color]


ldstlou,

Let's assume you are correct and Kermit outright lied in the above example.  Let's also assume that Kermit outright falsely claimed to be a Secret Service agent.

Hypothetically, let's say everyone concedes these two points to you.

The information Kermit has posted has still not been refuted.  Please, let's move forward from that point.

Go ahead and refute the information.

I'm all ears.




ok...then I am back where I started when this all started. I have two differing views on what happened and I am trying to discern the truth...credibility seems important to me.
I need to trust the messenger to trust the message.
Kermit is not the only "messenger".

Wreck, most of you here trust Kermit implicitly, I don't know her. I see pics that make me assume she is Secret Service and that would hold a lot of weight for me...I am very patriotic. I am just asking if it was fair of me to make the assumption based on what I saw and read and if it is true. That would definately go a long way for me.
You are not listening. We aare CONCEDING your mistrust of Kermit. Forget kermit ever existed.  Now, listen to what the OTHER 5 Freebirds are saying. (hint: it is the EXACT same thing!)
Kermit did not "uncover" this info -- it was all reported from FREEBIRDS  just as Kyle wrote to ALL of them. It was Kermit that decided to reveal what ALL the Freebirds knew.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #797 1/30/09 -
Post by: hotping on January 30, 2009, 10:16:19 PM
Welcome Monkey Mia!  ::MonkeyDance::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #797 1/30/09 -
Post by: ldstlou on January 30, 2009, 10:16:25 PM

Quote
Sat Nov 22, 2008
Here is a snippet from an email I rec'd from Lalas.
[/color]


ldstlou,

Let's assume you are correct and Kermit outright lied in the above example.  Let's also assume that Kermit outright falsely claimed to be a Secret Service agent.

Hypothetically, let's say everyone concedes these two points to you.

The information Kermit has posted has still not been refuted.  Please, let's move forward from that point.

Go ahead and refute the information.

I'm all ears.




ok...then I am back where I started when this all started. I have two differing views on what happened and I am trying to discern the truth...credibility seems important to me.
I need to trust the messenger to trust the message.
Lisa.This is a forum that people use nicknames and no one knows what each Monkey does for a living or who they really are..So You are saying that You don't trust anyone or their message unless You know their occupation..That's just plain stupid and if that's the way You feel You should not be on a public forum period..JMOO And no I'm not bashing You!

That is not what I am saying. I am saying...that when I questioned Kermit at first..she started throwing pics at me of her with Presidents and Monkeys saying she was Secret Service etc...I didn't bring it up you know. So now...if it is untrue...then I feel like I was being mislead. I mean wasn't the whole point of posting those pics for credibility?


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #797 1/30/09 -
Post by: Blue Moon on January 30, 2009, 10:16:59 PM

Quote
Sat Nov 22, 2008
Here is a snippet from an email I rec'd from Lalas.
[/color]


ldstlou,

Let's assume you are correct and Kermit outright lied in the above example.  Let's also assume that Kermit outright falsely claimed to be a Secret Service agent.

Hypothetically, let's say everyone concedes these two points to you.

The information Kermit has posted has still not been refuted.  Please, let's move forward from that point.

Go ahead and refute the information.

I'm all ears.




ok...then I am back where I started when this all started. I have two differing views on what happened and I am trying to discern the truth...credibility seems important to me.
I need to trust the messenger to trust the message.
Kermit is not the only "messenger".

Wreck, most of you here trust Kermit implicitly, I don't know her. I see pics that make me assume she is Secret Service and that would hold a lot of weight for me...I am very patriotic. I am just asking if it was fair of me to make the assumption based on what I saw and read and if it is true. That would definately go a long way for me.

Lou, I don't have the faintest idea who Kermit is or what her occupation is.  Heck I thought she was a he all along.  My opinion of Kermit versus Kyle comes from following the ocean search and Kyles posting here in the cage.  I had a very uneasy feeling the whole time they were in Aruba.  Kyle never did calm my feelings with his postings.  Something was never right about the AOE, his posting about their mutual understanding, the boat that sped past them.  Everytime I commented about bad feelings and not trusting Aruba Kyle would explain how PERFECT everything was.  I never believed from the beginning.  I never needed Kermit to form my opinions but I believe the words she has presented here and those words are Kyles words.  Just solidified my uneasy feelings.  Words cannot be taken back.  JMO


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #797 1/30/09 -
Post by: San on January 30, 2009, 10:18:13 PM

I am still waiting for the answer to my question too...am I the only one that got the impression that Kermit was implying she worked for the Secret Service...of course it could just be that reading comprehension problem I have too. lol

I saw pics posted here by Kermit that lead me to believe she worked for the Secret Service or possibly FBI. I also saw posts of Monkeys thanking her for her service to our country. To me it is about credibility...so am I allowed to ask if Kermit worked for the Secret Service or am I the only one that even assumed so?

What the hey...going to get bashed anyways...so did Kermit work for the Secret Service as she implied or not? It sure would help me a lot in regards to credibility if I knew I was not mislead about this issue.

Just because Kermit did not reveal what she did for a living is not my problem.  You got the impression and assumed she did.  She doesn't have to say what she does for a living for me to believe her.  I don't know what Kermit does for a living and I don't want to know what Kermit does for a living.

Credibility?  Ask the person who is probably emailing you as we speak about that word.

I am not a puppet and no one is e-mailing me.
I am simply asking a question. I know I am not the only one who thought she was Secret Service. What is the big deal? You post pics of yourself at Presidential funerals and events...I would say that is giving the impression she is Secret Service. Dear lawdy..I said apparently other Monkeys know her and trust her and I am trying to figure it all out..I think it is a fair question.

So is Kermit Secret Service as most would assume from the pics or not?

And I am not running away...have a bunch of 8 year olds here and trying to get ready for the protest so forgive me as I come and go!

It isn't a big deal to me whether she is or isn't SS.  I have always believed what Kermit wrote before she even posted those photos that made you think she was.  I based my opinion on what she has shown us from another person's words he wrote.  I made my mind up that Kyle is a liar.  Not because of Kermits occupation but because of the proof she has shown us.

Once again show us the proof.

I don't know her like you do San, I am sorry I don't. So I have to discern from what she posts. If I was lead to believe she was Secret Service and she is not, I just can't be sold on her story vs what I have been told by other people.

ldstlou you know her as much as I do.  I only know Kermit from her posts.  Just like I only knew Kyle from his posts.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #797 1/30/09 -
Post by: Monkey Mia on January 30, 2009, 10:19:11 PM
Hello hotping.  I don't think I am that exciting.  LOL


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #797 1/30/09 -
Post by: Tamikosmom on January 30, 2009, 10:19:20 PM
Lou ... the former administrater of the Natalee's Freebirds' (jen) ... confirmed that Kermit shared Kyle Kingman's words with the SM Natalee Holloway forum.

Think about.  Logic dictates if the Natalee's Freebirds were to send Kyle's own words as well as the ROV images to Beth Holloway, John Kelly and the FBI ... they would have to have backup proof that Kyle Kingman was the originator.  I do believe that IP numbers ...

Anyways ... I am a believer in Kyle Kingman's own words ... words that expose the John Silvetti participation in the finale to the great Aruban coverup ... the John Silvetti betrayal to the family of Natalee Holloway.

Janet

++++++

klassend
Re: Natalee Case Discussion #787 12/24/08 -
« Reply #411 on: December 30, 2008, 06:53:44 PM »

Sent to me by Natalee's Freebirds
:

Please feel free (if you'd like) to post this at your board.
 
During the journey of the Persistence to Aruba, Kyle reached out and emailed with us.  During that time, one of the questions posed to him was regarding protocol if/when Natalee's remains were found.
 
Kyle's response was that he was unsure, but felt that would be settled before the search began.
 
The cautions were given to him about the lack of integrity on the part of Aruba's law enforcement, prosecutor's office, and its judiciary.
 
Contact with Kyle continued throughout the duration of the search by the Persistence.
 
Once back home, Kyle asked us for our help.  He was very concerned about the activities that transpired during their search - specifically surrounding the find of the fishing cage and its contents.  Kyle wanted our help in presenting this information in a factual way, to then be given to Natalee's family. 
 
This was March 18, 2008.  At that time, Kyle assured us he had just recently sent the images from the Dec 30th and Jan 7th dives to the FBI, but had never received a response from them.
 
We later found that to be false.
 
Also at that time, Beth's brother saw the images Kyle had shared with us - but none of the detail he shared later.

We compiled the images Kyle presented us, along with his opinions and the facts surrounding the sequence of events regarding that fishing cage.  Kyle stated he would be getting in touch with Beth Holloway.
 
We later found out that never happened.

At this time, Kyle shared with us the broadcast networks he had approached in February, in an attempt to sell these images to the highest bidder.
 
This didn't concern us greatly at that time - as we were under the impression US law enforcement and Natalee's family had already been made aware of their find.
 
Approximately May 2008 Kyle began dodging questions for details (we had asked for names of Aruban police and divers to be included in our documentation of these events), hedging on moving forward with this, and then he completely disappeared from our board.
 
During that time, we learned Kyle had never contacted Beth, or Dave, or the FBI with this information.
 
We put our original plan into motion - that of presenting this information in a clear and concise manner, and we sent it to Beth Holloway.
 
Beth was disturbed, needed time to digest the information, and wanted to share it with someone she trusts.
 
When Tim Miller was returning to Aruba this past fall, Beth gave us permission to release this information publicly.
 
At that point, we gave it to John Kelly, Carmen Adams with the FBI, and got it ready for public consumption.
 
The next step was to publish this information at our blog.
 
One of our members felt we were betraying Kyle in doing so, contacted him, and he re-surfaced at our site with threats of litigation against us - stating this was his "intellectual property" and we could not use it.
 
That of course concerned us greatly - as none of us could afford to be sued.
 
He also stated at that time, Luis Shaefer had just recently sold the rights of the video of these images to a broadcast company for the purposes of a documentary.
 
We contacted legal counsel and were advised to keep our distance from any Persistence crew member, in the face of potential obstruction/accessory charges.
 
At this point, one of our members decided to brace for the possibility of civil litigation, resigned from our membership to protect it from same, and posted what he knows to be factual at SM.
 
Kyle did tell us human remains were found in that fish cage.
 
Kyle did tell us about John Silvetti's intent to open an office on the island of Aruba, to enable him ease in conducting business in South America, and Aruba.
 
Kyle also told us of John's absolute refusal to give that fish cage and its contents any credence - before even it was inspected on Jan 7th.
 
Kyle told us in no uncertain terms that Tim Miller and Dateline were abruptly removed from the Persistence on Dec 30, resulting in only Persistence crew being aboard between that date and the Jan 7 dive of the Arubans.
 
Nothing that was posted at SM by kermit was incorrect, out of context, or in any way false.
 
Regards,
 
Former Natalee's Freebirds Administrator

Natalee and her family deserve justice - and we will not let up until they have it!

http://scaredmonkeys.net/index.php?topic=4269.msg603349#msg603349


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #797 1/30/09 -
Post by: Magnolia on January 30, 2009, 10:20:48 PM
I know two people (children of friends) who guarded George
Bush.  Neither of the two is Secret Service.
It is just so unimportant.

I am sure that Jug and Kyle are soooo much more credible
than the Freebirds.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #797 1/30/09 -
Post by: ldstlou on January 30, 2009, 10:21:07 PM

Quote
Sat Nov 22, 2008
Here is a snippet from an email I rec'd from Lalas.
[/color]


ldstlou,

Let's assume you are correct and Kermit outright lied in the above example.  Let's also assume that Kermit outright falsely claimed to be a Secret Service agent.

Hypothetically, let's say everyone concedes these two points to you.

The information Kermit has posted has still not been refuted.  Please, let's move forward from that point.

Go ahead and refute the information.

I'm all ears.




ok...then I am back where I started when this all started. I have two differing views on what happened and I am trying to discern the truth...credibility seems important to me.
I need to trust the messenger to trust the message.
Kermit is not the only "messenger".

Wreck, most of you here trust Kermit implicitly, I don't know her. I see pics that make me assume she is Secret Service and that would hold a lot of weight for me...I am very patriotic. I am just asking if it was fair of me to make the assumption based on what I saw and read and if it is true. That would definately go a long way for me.
You are not listening. We aare CONCEDING your mistrust of Kermit. Forget kermit ever existed.  Now, listen to what the OTHER 5 Freebirds are saying. (hint: it is the EXACT same thing!)
Kermit did not "uncover" this info -- it was all reported from FREEBIRDS  just as Kyle wrote to ALL of them. It was Kermit that decided to reveal what ALL the Freebirds knew.

I understand what you are saying to me Wreck...forget about the messenger and focus on the message. But then I go back to what Kyle was doing at the Freebirds. He was expressing concerns and doubts he had about what went on. They were simply concerns of Kyles, not facts about what happened. There is a difference.

I have always said we will never know what was in the cage because ALE took off with the evidence unexpectedly. But I just don't believe the members of the crew of the Persistence were involved in a conspiracy with the ALE.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #797 1/30/09 -
Post by: ldstlou on January 30, 2009, 10:22:23 PM

I am still waiting for the answer to my question too...am I the only one that got the impression that Kermit was implying she worked for the Secret Service...of course it could just be that reading comprehension problem I have too. lol

I saw pics posted here by Kermit that lead me to believe she worked for the Secret Service or possibly FBI. I also saw posts of Monkeys thanking her for her service to our country. To me it is about credibility...so am I allowed to ask if Kermit worked for the Secret Service or am I the only one that even assumed so?

What the hey...going to get bashed anyways...so did Kermit work for the Secret Service as she implied or not? It sure would help me a lot in regards to credibility if I knew I was not mislead about this issue.

Just because Kermit did not reveal what she did for a living is not my problem.  You got the impression and assumed she did.  She doesn't have to say what she does for a living for me to believe her.  I don't know what Kermit does for a living and I don't want to know what Kermit does for a living.

Credibility?  Ask the person who is probably emailing you as we speak about that word.

I am not a puppet and no one is e-mailing me.
I am simply asking a question. I know I am not the only one who thought she was Secret Service. What is the big deal? You post pics of yourself at Presidential funerals and events...I would say that is giving the impression she is Secret Service. Dear lawdy..I said apparently other Monkeys know her and trust her and I am trying to figure it all out..I think it is a fair question.

So is Kermit Secret Service as most would assume from the pics or not?

And I am not running away...have a bunch of 8 year olds here and trying to get ready for the protest so forgive me as I come and go!

It isn't a big deal to me whether she is or isn't SS.  I have always believed what Kermit wrote before she even posted those photos that made you think she was.  I based my opinion on what she has shown us from another person's words he wrote.  I made my mind up that Kyle is a liar.  Not because of Kermits occupation but because of the proof she has shown us.

Once again show us the proof.

I don't know her like you do San, I am sorry I don't. So I have to discern from what she posts. If I was lead to believe she was Secret Service and she is not, I just can't be sold on her story vs what I have been told by other people.

ldstlou you know her as much as I do.  I only know Kermit from her posts.  Just like I only knew Kyle from his posts.

Sorry San, I thought you knew her. I apologize.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #797 1/30/09 -
Post by: Anna on January 30, 2009, 10:23:00 PM
Kermit never said the email from Lala's was addressesd to him or sent directy from her to him.

Kermit never said the email from Lala's was addressesd to him or sent directy from her to him.

Kermit never said the email from Lala's was addressesd to him or sent directy from her to him.




Jug does know. He may just not be informing Idstlou
Re: Natalee Case Discussion #793 1/13/09
January 17, 2009, 06:21:44 PM »
Kermit ... who is "I".
/http://scaredmonkeys.net/index.php?topic=4371.660
XXXX:  Sat Nov 22, 2008 8:10 am    Post subject:    Reply with quote
Here is a snippet from an email I rec'd from Lalas.
I asked Jug about Schaeffer...he is the oil guy. He was the one that provided the cash to get down there. Silvetti knew he would get more business from Schaeffer if he mapped....while they were looking...the ocean floor. All the crew was asked to do was look for Natalee or anything suspicious as in small things like a cage or bones or whatever.
They do a large mapping process while they are looking for the details. Schaeffer would use the large mapping of the general layout of the ocean floor to further look for oil...etc...while they looked for Natalee too.

Silvetti was the one that offered to look for Natalee and not Schaefer


She did so Ana


(http://img136.imageshack.us/img136/8025/idstlouda0.jpg)





I think that ldstlou has a reading comprehension problem.
She only comprehends what she believes.
No matter how one tries to explain to her ...she will not
accept the answers.
   I think she is a hopeless case.

You are correct Magnolia.

or maybe I just copied the wrong post...dear lawdy

How about this one?

Quote
71   Natalee Holloway / Natalee Holloway / Re: Natalee Case Discussion #795 1/23/09 -  on: January 27, 2009, 12:35:23 AM 
oceanexploration
I haven't seen Kermit post anything untrue presented as factual.
http://scaredmonkeys.net/index.php?topic=4153.660



Sat Nov 22, 2008
Here is a snippet from an email I rec'd from Lalas.

I asked Jug about Schaeffer...he is the oil guy. He was the one that provided the cash to get down there. Silvetti knew he would get more business from Schaeffer if he mapped....while they were looking...the ocean floor. All the crew was asked to do was look for Natalee or anything suspicious as in small things like a cage or bones or whatever.
They do a large mapping process while they are looking for the details. Schaeffer would use the large mapping of the general layout of the ocean floor to further look for oil...etc...while they looked for Natalee too.

Silvetti was the one that offered to look for Natalee and not Schaefer.



Isdtlou
So now you're trying to tell us that Jug Twitty lied to lalasmom or was it lalasmom lying to her friends?


I am still waiting for the answer to my question too...am I the only one that got the impression that Kermit was implying she worked for the Secret Service...of course it could just be that reading comprehension problem I have too. lol

I saw pics posted here by Kermit that lead me to believe she worked for the Secret Service or possibly FBI. I also saw posts of Monkeys thanking her for her service to our country. To me it is about credibility...so am I allowed to ask if Kermit worked for the Secret Service or am I the only one that even assumed so?

What the hey...going to get bashed anyways...so did Kermit work for the Secret Service as she implied or not? It sure would help me a lot in regards to credibility if I knew I was not mislead about this issue.


No, that one says the same thing.  Clear as can be Kermit says that was Lala's to her friend, not to Kermit directly.


Since when is posting an employment history a requirement here? 





Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #797 1/30/09 -
Post by: Tibrogargan on January 30, 2009, 10:24:11 PM

Quote
Sat Nov 22, 2008
Here is a snippet from an email I rec'd from Lalas.
[/color]


ldstlou,

Let's assume you are correct and Kermit outright lied in the above example.  Let's also assume that Kermit outright falsely claimed to be a Secret Service agent.

Hypothetically, let's say everyone concedes these two points to you.

The information Kermit has posted has still not been refuted.  Please, let's move forward from that point.

Go ahead and refute the information.

I'm all ears.




ok...then I am back where I started when this all started. I have two differing views on what happened and I am trying to discern the truth...credibility seems important to me.
I need to trust the messenger to trust the message.
Lisa.This is a forum that people use nicknames and no one knows what each Monkey does for a living or who they really are..So You are saying that You don't trust anyone or their message unless You know their occupation..That's just plain stupid and if that's the way You feel You should not be on a public forum period..JMOO And no I'm not bashing You!

That is not what I am saying. I am saying...that when I questioned Kermit at first..she started throwing pics at me of her with Presidents and Monkeys saying she was Secret Service etc...I didn't bring it up you know. So now...if it is untrue...then I feel like I was being mislead. I mean wasn't the whole point of posting those pics for credibility?


Here we go again ......

Lisa the only reason I would even suspect that Kermit or anyone else depicted in those pictures were Secret Service was if the caption said only SS agents attended the funeral/function/whatever.  I do not care whether Kermit is an SS agent or a shop assistant - I am only interested in her information and the fact she has provided proof of what she has posted. Something that is sorely lacking from any of her opponents.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #797 1/30/09 -
Post by: ldstlou on January 30, 2009, 10:24:50 PM
Kermit never said the email from Lala's was addressesd to him or sent directy from her to him.

Kermit never said the email from Lala's was addressesd to him or sent directy from her to him.

Kermit never said the email from Lala's was addressesd to him or sent directy from her to him.




Jug does know. He may just not be informing Idstlou
Re: Natalee Case Discussion #793 1/13/09
January 17, 2009, 06:21:44 PM »
Kermit ... who is "I".
/http://scaredmonkeys.net/index.php?topic=4371.660
XXXX:  Sat Nov 22, 2008 8:10 am    Post subject:    Reply with quote
Here is a snippet from an email I rec'd from Lalas.
I asked Jug about Schaeffer...he is the oil guy. He was the one that provided the cash to get down there. Silvetti knew he would get more business from Schaeffer if he mapped....while they were looking...the ocean floor. All the crew was asked to do was look for Natalee or anything suspicious as in small things like a cage or bones or whatever.
They do a large mapping process while they are looking for the details. Schaeffer would use the large mapping of the general layout of the ocean floor to further look for oil...etc...while they looked for Natalee too.

Silvetti was the one that offered to look for Natalee and not Schaefer


She did so Ana


(http://img136.imageshack.us/img136/8025/idstlouda0.jpg)





I think that ldstlou has a reading comprehension problem.
She only comprehends what she believes.
No matter how one tries to explain to her ...she will not
accept the answers.
   I think she is a hopeless case.

You are correct Magnolia.

or maybe I just copied the wrong post...dear lawdy

How about this one?

Quote
71   Natalee Holloway / Natalee Holloway / Re: Natalee Case Discussion #795 1/23/09 -  on: January 27, 2009, 12:35:23 AM 
oceanexploration
I haven't seen Kermit post anything untrue presented as factual.
http://scaredmonkeys.net/index.php?topic=4153.660



Sat Nov 22, 2008
Here is a snippet from an email I rec'd from Lalas.

I asked Jug about Schaeffer...he is the oil guy. He was the one that provided the cash to get down there. Silvetti knew he would get more business from Schaeffer if he mapped....while they were looking...the ocean floor. All the crew was asked to do was look for Natalee or anything suspicious as in small things like a cage or bones or whatever.
They do a large mapping process while they are looking for the details. Schaeffer would use the large mapping of the general layout of the ocean floor to further look for oil...etc...while they looked for Natalee too.

Silvetti was the one that offered to look for Natalee and not Schaefer.



Isdtlou
So now you're trying to tell us that Jug Twitty lied to lalasmom or was it lalasmom lying to her friends?
 


I am still waiting for the answer to my question too...am I the only one that got the impression that Kermit was implying she worked for the Secret Service...of course it could just be that reading comprehension problem I have too. lol

I saw pics posted here by Kermit that lead me to believe she worked for the Secret Service or possibly FBI. I also saw posts of Monkeys thanking her for her service to our country. To me it is about credibility...so am I allowed to ask if Kermit worked for the Secret Service or am I the only one that even assumed so?

What the hey...going to get bashed anyways...so did Kermit work for the Secret Service as she implied or not? It sure would help me a lot in regards to credibility if I knew I was not mislead about this issue.

I forward many emails to my family & friends...they can say they got it from me, but I didn't compose it. 




I copied the wrong one earlier. I was working and posting today...so sorry. I went back and found the first one that lead me to believe Kermit had received the e-mail directly from lalas.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #797 1/30/09 -
Post by: wreck on January 30, 2009, 10:25:04 PM

Quote
Sat Nov 22, 2008
Here is a snippet from an email I rec'd from Lalas.
[/color]


ldstlou,

Let's assume you are correct and Kermit outright lied in the above example.  Let's also assume that Kermit outright falsely claimed to be a Secret Service agent.

Hypothetically, let's say everyone concedes these two points to you.

The information Kermit has posted has still not been refuted.  Please, let's move forward from that point.

Go ahead and refute the information.

I'm all ears.




ok...then I am back where I started when this all started. I have two differing views on what happened and I am trying to discern the truth...credibility seems important to me.
I need to trust the messenger to trust the message.
Kermit is not the only "messenger".

Wreck, most of you here trust Kermit implicitly, I don't know her. I see pics that make me assume she is Secret Service and that would hold a lot of weight for me...I am very patriotic. I am just asking if it was fair of me to make the assumption based on what I saw and read and if it is true. That would definately go a long way for me.
You are not listening. We aare CONCEDING your mistrust of Kermit. Forget kermit ever existed.  Now, listen to what the OTHER 5 Freebirds are saying. (hint: it is the EXACT same thing!)
Kermit did not "uncover" this info -- it was all reported from FREEBIRDS  just as Kyle wrote to ALL of them. It was Kermit that decided to reveal what ALL the Freebirds knew.

I understand what you are saying to me Wreck...forget about the messenger and focus on the message. But then I go back to what Kyle was doing at the Freebirds. He was expressing concerns and doubts he had about what went on. They were simply concerns of Kyles, not facts about what happened. There is a difference.

I have always said we will never know what was in the cage because ALE took off with the evidence unexpectedly. But I just don't believe the members of the crew of the Persistence were involved in a conspiracy with the ALE.
Believe what you want -- but quit calling us the "crazy" ones.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #797 1/30/09 -
Post by: hotping on January 30, 2009, 10:25:27 PM
Hello hotping.  I don't think I am that exciting.  LOL
Oh, Come on ... I bet You can do the Monkey Dance...Can't Ya its Easy! Watch... ::MonkeyDance:: ::MonkeyDance:: ::MonkeyDance:: lol


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #797 1/30/09 -
Post by: ldstlou on January 30, 2009, 10:27:23 PM

Quote
Sat Nov 22, 2008
Here is a snippet from an email I rec'd from Lalas.
[/color]


ldstlou,

Let's assume you are correct and Kermit outright lied in the above example.  Let's also assume that Kermit outright falsely claimed to be a Secret Service agent.

Hypothetically, let's say everyone concedes these two points to you.

The information Kermit has posted has still not been refuted.  Please, let's move forward from that point.

Go ahead and refute the information.

I'm all ears.




ok...then I am back where I started when this all started. I have two differing views on what happened and I am trying to discern the truth...credibility seems important to me.
I need to trust the messenger to trust the message.
Lisa.This is a forum that people use nicknames and no one knows what each Monkey does for a living or who they really are..So You are saying that You don't trust anyone or their message unless You know their occupation..That's just plain stupid and if that's the way You feel You should not be on a public forum period..JMOO And no I'm not bashing You!

That is not what I am saying. I am saying...that when I questioned Kermit at first..she started throwing pics at me of her with Presidents and Monkeys saying she was Secret Service etc...I didn't bring it up you know. So now...if it is untrue...then I feel like I was being mislead. I mean wasn't the whole point of posting those pics for credibility?


Here we go again ......

Lisa the only reason I would even suspect that Kermit or anyone else depicted in those pictures were Secret Service was if the caption said only SS agents attended the funeral/function/whatever.  I do not care whether Kermit is an SS agent or a shop assistant - I am only interested in her information and the fact she has provided proof of what she has posted. Something that is sorely lacking from any of her opponents.

I understand that, my problem is when I was doubting Kermit...and this was awhile ago when I first started reading the info...and I said I was doubting it...Kermit posted the pics as though that was WHY I should believe her. Can't go back and look it up now...8 year olds are too busy and I have to keep an eye on them too!! lol


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #797 1/30/09 -
Post by: Blue Moon on January 30, 2009, 10:28:49 PM
The most despicable thing I have heard during all this is what Kermit told today about her information being given to the Arubans.  It is a sad day when that happens. 

JUSTICE FOR NATALEE
[/size][/size][/size][/color]


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #797 1/30/09 -
Post by: ldstlou on January 30, 2009, 10:29:35 PM

Quote
Sat Nov 22, 2008
Here is a snippet from an email I rec'd from Lalas.
[/color]


ldstlou,

Let's assume you are correct and Kermit outright lied in the above example.  Let's also assume that Kermit outright falsely claimed to be a Secret Service agent.

Hypothetically, let's say everyone concedes these two points to you.

The information Kermit has posted has still not been refuted.  Please, let's move forward from that point.

Go ahead and refute the information.

I'm all ears.




ok...then I am back where I started when this all started. I have two differing views on what happened and I am trying to discern the truth...credibility seems important to me.
I need to trust the messenger to trust the message.
Kermit is not the only "messenger".

Wreck, most of you here trust Kermit implicitly, I don't know her. I see pics that make me assume she is Secret Service and that would hold a lot of weight for me...I am very patriotic. I am just asking if it was fair of me to make the assumption based on what I saw and read and if it is true. That would definately go a long way for me.
You are not listening. We aare CONCEDING your mistrust of Kermit. Forget kermit ever existed.  Now, listen to what the OTHER 5 Freebirds are saying. (hint: it is the EXACT same thing!)
Kermit did not "uncover" this info -- it was all reported from FREEBIRDS  just as Kyle wrote to ALL of them. It was Kermit that decided to reveal what ALL the Freebirds knew.

I understand what you are saying to me Wreck...forget about the messenger and focus on the message. But then I go back to what Kyle was doing at the Freebirds. He was expressing concerns and doubts he had about what went on. They were simply concerns of Kyles, not facts about what happened. There is a difference.

I have always said we will never know what was in the cage because ALE took off with the evidence unexpectedly. But I just don't believe the members of the crew of the Persistence were involved in a conspiracy with the ALE.
Believe what you want -- but quit calling us the "crazy" ones.

Wreck...that is like calling the kettle black...lol...you are correct! I never should have said that. I apologize from the bottom of my heart. It got emotional for me that night and that remark was totally uncalled for!! Anyone who knows me knows I shouldn't be calling anyone crazy!! lol

Hope you accept my apology.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #797 1/30/09 -
Post by: Anna on January 30, 2009, 10:31:11 PM
I copied the wrong one earlier. I was working and posting today...so sorry. I went back and found the first one that lead me to believe Kermit had received the e-mail directly from lalas.


WRONG!

That is the second one you copied, the one you claim is the right one and it says the same thing!  It says that Lala's was sending this to her FRIENDS and does NOT say she sent it to Kermit.

You never take the time to even read what people respond to you, do you?  Just too busy but you are not too busy to try to find out personal information about other posters?



Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #797 1/30/09 -
Post by: Icehawk on January 30, 2009, 10:31:20 PM
http://www.hollowaycase.com/archive/civil_court_docs/arubancounselfile.htm





Lots of info.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #797 1/30/09 -
Post by: Monkey Mia on January 30, 2009, 10:33:06 PM
Hello hotping.  I don't think I am that exciting.  LOL
Oh, Come on ... I bet You can do the Monkey Dance...Can't Ya its Easy! Watch... ::MonkeyDance:: ::MonkeyDance:: ::MonkeyDance:: lol


You are a hoot!


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #797 1/30/09 -
Post by: Lifesong on January 30, 2009, 10:34:55 PM

I understand what you are saying to me Wreck...forget about the messenger and focus on the message. But then I go back to what Kyle was doing at the Freebirds. He was expressing concerns and doubts he had about what went on. They were simply concerns of Kyles, not facts about what happened. There is a difference.

I have always said we will never know what was in the cage because ALE took off with the evidence unexpectedly. But I just don't believe the members of the crew of the Persistence were involved in a conspiracy with the ALE.  

I completely respect your right to that opinion.  I applaud you for caring enough to even have an opinion.  And more importantly, I even hope that you are right.

Unfortunately, I believe it's quite possible there's something hinky going on.  I believe that based upon the content Kyle's statements and the timing of events. 

ldstlou, I hope I'm wrong. 

But no matter where the search for the truth about what happened to Natalee leads, I'll go there.  Even if it were to lead back to Alabama (which we all know it doesn't), I would follow it.  No matter who it implicates. 

I think we can coexist with these different opinions, so long as you have as much respect for my opinion as I have for yours.



Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #797 1/30/09 -
Post by: Tamikosmom on January 30, 2009, 10:36:54 PM
Lou ... the revelation of Kyle Kingman's posts which had been submitted to the Natalee's Freebirds' site was such a relief.  My suspicions which orginated from Kyle's own words on the SM site were validated.

Janet

++++++

KYLE KINGMAN - IN HIS OWN WORDS

oceanexploration
Re: Natalee Case Discussion #715 1/25 -
« Reply #103 on: January 26, 2008, 12:38:25 PM »


Thought you all may find this interesting if you're willing to accept it-

To date, the Aruban police and dive team has been a tremendous help. They've honestly done a great job. Over the last month we've established a very good working relationship based on openness and trust. Most of the relationship success was due to getting the media out of the way and working together shoulder to shoulder over time. We've helped each other however and whenever we can. They've treated us with decency and respect and we have treated them as friends and allies, which they are. Most of the police and divers are new since this case started and both eager and careful to do things right. I wish we had a month ahead of the project just to establish the relationships and trust. I know many of you would likely doubt this view, but it's based on the experiences in the field of the entire search team. I too was extremely worried, paranoid, and suspecting in the beginning. Now, it's clear we're all working towards a common goal.
http://scaredmonkeys.net/index.php?topic=2539.msg332457;topicseen#msg332457


oceanexploration
Re: Natalee Case Discussion #744 3/19 -
« Reply #201 on: March 19, 2008, 08:21:47 PM »


We had little option other than to have the Aruban dive division recover the samples and bring them back under their care. Remember we are Americans working in Aruban waters, subject to their laws, invitation, and blessing. Our hands are tied for the most part. I personally was extremely uncomfortable with the chain of custody, being that we weren't a part of it, but I was powerless to do anything about it. The samples were photographed in detail by one Aruban diver and the other two investigated the contents of the trap, the dimensions, the rigging, and what surrounded the trap. From the video, it looked like they did a diligent and careful job with the samples and the underwater photography. I don't know who has these pictures, but I must assume ALE.

http://scaredmonkeys.net/index.php?topic=2721.msg366857;topicseen#msg366857


ocean exploration
Re: Natalee Case Discussion #743 3/14 -
« Reply #709 on: March 18, 2008, 03:11:50 PM »


As of the 2nd week of Feb, this is what I had learned from the FBI:
The contents of the trap were being actively investigated. The forensic results of a fabric sample showed the fabric sample was not a match to Natalee's blouse and that no DNA match to Natalee was found within that fabric sample. Human remains were found, but the FBI was not and would not comment on the case. The FBI did not comment on the remains, but rather the fabric sample.

http://scaredmonkeys.net/index.php?topic=2705.700


A VERY CLOSE FAMILY MEMBER

private eye
Re: Natalee Case Discussion #746 4/4
« Reply #499 on: April 09, 2008, 12:39:50 AM »


If I understood Kyle correctly, and that would be that the Arubans retrieved and possessed all finds, not sharing anything with the crew, then that effort was a waste of time and effort. The only thing it could have accomplished was to locate additional evidence for the Arubans to destroy. I am not sure if that was the protocol out of Aruba's waters though. The effort was superb, but the game was fixed.

http://scaredmonkeys.net/index.php?topic=2769.msg372245;topicseen#msg372245


private eye
 Discussion #742 3/10 -
« Reply #686 on: March 13, 2008, 06:38:07 PM
»

... But sharing information with people who work for people who are directly orchestrating the cover up, Rudy, or the Dutch, is the most irresponsible investigating I can imagine. What kills this investigation is people having to come into it, wanting to apply basic investigatory protocols into place, and then having those channels sabotage the new evidence that the new players discover. Of course, as is happened everytime in this case, the new people eventually come to a point where the manipulation of the evidence is undeniable, but by then the fruits of their work are gone, and there is simply another member of the believers of the cover up group. What I pray that Kyle and the crew of the Persistence will determine, is that  regardless of how hard working the man that they are working with appears to work, his work belongs to Rudy, and Rudy belongs to the local dutch.  

We are not hysterical, ignorant, paranoid people. We have seen the cover up in action, in broad daylight, with impunity, and if you disregard our warnings, you will become the next chump in a series of chumps, no matter how sophisticated your equipment, the level of your educational achievement, or the extent of your job skills and work history.

http://scaredmonkeys.net/index.php?topic=2689.msg364750#msg364750


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #797 1/30/09 -
Post by: Anna on January 30, 2009, 10:38:34 PM
Lisa,
Here is the quote from your "right" one:



Sat Nov 22, 2008
Here is a snippet from an email I rec'd from Lalas.

I asked Jug about Schaeffer...he is the oil guy. He was the one that provided the cash to get down there. Silvetti knew he would get more business from Schaeffer if he mapped....while they were looking...the ocean floor. All the crew was asked to do was look for Natalee or anything suspicious as in small things like a cage or bones or whatever.
They do a large mapping process while they are looking for the details. Schaeffer would use the large mapping of the general layout of the ocean floor to further look for oil...etc...while they looked for Natalee too.

Silvetti was the one that offered to look for Natalee and not Schaefer.



Isdtlou
So now you're trying to tell us that Jug Twitty lied to lalasmom or was it lalasmom lying to her friends?


----------


Use your finger to read along if it helps.

Kermit is asking you if Lalas was lying to her friends, not to Kermit.

At no time did Kermit EVER say Lalas sent that directly to him.







Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #797 1/30/09 -
Post by: Blue Moon on January 30, 2009, 10:40:51 PM
http://www.hollowaycase.com/archive/civil_court_docs/arubancounselfile.htm





Lots of info.

Interesting read.  This is the 5th suspect (joran, deepak, satish, steve croes and then:

Name: Freddy Alexander Arambaizis
Date: 13 June 2005 / 17:00
Pages: 5
Writer/Initiator. Johny Erasmus
Description: witness statement


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #797 1/30/09 -
Post by: hotping on January 30, 2009, 10:42:21 PM
Hello hotping.  I don't think I am that exciting.  LOL
Oh, Come on ... I bet You can do the Monkey Dance...Can't Ya its Easy! Watch... ::MonkeyDance:: ::MonkeyDance:: ::MonkeyDance:: lol


You are a hoot!
Just trying to make You feel Welcome!  ::MonkeyWink::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #797 1/30/09 -
Post by: ldstlou on January 30, 2009, 10:42:32 PM

I understand what you are saying to me Wreck...forget about the messenger and focus on the message. But then I go back to what Kyle was doing at the Freebirds. He was expressing concerns and doubts he had about what went on. They were simply concerns of Kyles, not facts about what happened. There is a difference.

I have always said we will never know what was in the cage because ALE took off with the evidence unexpectedly. But I just don't believe the members of the crew of the Persistence were involved in a conspiracy with the ALE.  

I completely respect your right to that opinion.  I applaud you for caring enough to even have an opinion.  And more importantly, I even hope that you are right.

Unfortunately, I believe it's quite possible there's something hinky going on.  I believe that based upon the content Kyle's statements and the timing of events. 

ldstlou, I hope I'm wrong. 

But no matter where the search for the truth about what happened to Natalee leads, I'll go there.  Even if it were to lead back to Alabama (which we all know it doesn't), I would follow it.  No matter who it implicates. 

I think we can coexist with these different opinions, so long as you have as much respect for my opinion as I have for yours.



Thanks Lifesong..that means a lot to me.
I really have to get these guys to bed though. Taking my scouts with me again this weekend.
Have a good night everyone.
Let's all keep up the good fight!
No Justice for Natalee, No Tourist for Aruba!!


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #797 1/30/09 -
Post by: Anna on January 30, 2009, 10:44:00 PM
http://www.hollowaycase.com/archive/civil_court_docs/arubancounselfile.htm



Thank you Icehawk.

I am not sure if I have ever seen that site before.

Interesting information on the never-ending Kalpoe case.

I wonder if they realized how long this kind of suit could in fact take and what the attorney fees could amass to be.






Lots of info.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #797 1/30/09 -
Post by: ldstlou on January 30, 2009, 10:45:06 PM
Lou ... the revelation of Kyle Kingman's posts which had been submitted to the Natalee's Freebirds' site was such a relief.  My suspicions which orginated from Kyle's own words on the SM site were validated.

Janet

++++++

KYLE KINGMAN - IN HIS OWN WORDS

oceanexploration
Re: Natalee Case Discussion #715 1/25 -
« Reply #103 on: January 26, 2008, 12:38:25 PM »


Thought you all may find this interesting if you're willing to accept it-

To date, the Aruban police and dive team has been a tremendous help. They've honestly done a great job. Over the last month we've established a very good working relationship based on openness and trust. Most of the relationship success was due to getting the media out of the way and working together shoulder to shoulder over time. We've helped each other however and whenever we can. They've treated us with decency and respect and we have treated them as friends and allies, which they are. Most of the police and divers are new since this case started and both eager and careful to do things right. I wish we had a month ahead of the project just to establish the relationships and trust. I know many of you would likely doubt this view, but it's based on the experiences in the field of the entire search team. I too was extremely worried, paranoid, and suspecting in the beginning. Now, it's clear we're all working towards a common goal.
http://scaredmonkeys.net/index.php?topic=2539.msg332457;topicseen#msg332457


oceanexploration
Re: Natalee Case Discussion #744 3/19 -
« Reply #201 on: March 19, 2008, 08:21:47 PM »


We had little option other than to have the Aruban dive division recover the samples and bring them back under their care. Remember we are Americans working in Aruban waters, subject to their laws, invitation, and blessing. Our hands are tied for the most part. I personally was extremely uncomfortable with the chain of custody, being that we weren't a part of it, but I was powerless to do anything about it. The samples were photographed in detail by one Aruban diver and the other two investigated the contents of the trap, the dimensions, the rigging, and what surrounded the trap. From the video, it looked like they did a diligent and careful job with the samples and the underwater photography. I don't know who has these pictures, but I must assume ALE.

http://scaredmonkeys.net/index.php?topic=2721.msg366857;topicseen#msg366857


ocean exploration
Re: Natalee Case Discussion #743 3/14 -
« Reply #709 on: March 18, 2008, 03:11:50 PM »


As of the 2nd week of Feb, this is what I had learned from the FBI:
The contents of the trap were being actively investigated. The forensic results of a fabric sample showed the fabric sample was not a match to Natalee's blouse and that no DNA match to Natalee was found within that fabric sample. Human remains were found, but the FBI was not and would not comment on the case. The FBI did not comment on the remains, but rather the fabric sample.

http://scaredmonkeys.net/index.php?topic=2705.700


A VERY CLOSE FAMILY MEMBER

private eye
Re: Natalee Case Discussion #746 4/4
« Reply #499 on: April 09, 2008, 12:39:50 AM »


If I understood Kyle correctly, and that would be that the Arubans retrieved and possessed all finds, not sharing anything with the crew, then that effort was a waste of time and effort. The only thing it could have accomplished was to locate additional evidence for the Arubans to destroy. I am not sure if that was the protocol out of Aruba's waters though. The effort was superb, but the game was fixed.

http://scaredmonkeys.net/index.php?topic=2769.msg372245;topicseen#msg372245


private eye
 Discussion #742 3/10 -
« Reply #686 on: March 13, 2008, 06:38:07 PM
»

... But sharing information with people who work for people who are directly orchestrating the cover up, Rudy, or the Dutch, is the most irresponsible investigating I can imagine. What kills this investigation is people having to come into it, wanting to apply basic investigatory protocols into place, and then having those channels sabotage the new evidence that the new players discover. Of course, as is happened everytime in this case, the new people eventually come to a point where the manipulation of the evidence is undeniable, but by then the fruits of their work are gone, and there is simply another member of the believers of the cover up group. What I pray that Kyle and the crew of the Persistence will determine, is that  regardless of how hard working the man that they are working with appears to work, his work belongs to Rudy, and Rudy belongs to the local dutch.  

We are not hysterical, ignorant, paranoid people. We have seen the cover up in action, in broad daylight, with impunity, and if you disregard our warnings, you will become the next chump in a series of chumps, no matter how sophisticated your equipment, the level of your educational achievement, or the extent of your job skills and work history.

http://scaredmonkeys.net/index.php?topic=2689.msg364750#msg364750


Janet, you know I luv ya!! I sent you the UPS guys didn't I??!!
Sorry this caused a rift between us. I totally respect your beliefs, I just feel differently about who the bad guys were.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #797 1/30/09 -
Post by: ldstlou on January 30, 2009, 10:45:39 PM
ok...night everyone!!


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #797 1/30/09 -
Post by: hotping on January 30, 2009, 10:47:08 PM

I understand what you are saying to me Wreck...forget about the messenger and focus on the message. But then I go back to what Kyle was doing at the Freebirds. He was expressing concerns and doubts he had about what went on. They were simply concerns of Kyles, not facts about what happened. There is a difference.

I have always said we will never know what was in the cage because ALE took off with the evidence unexpectedly. But I just don't believe the members of the crew of the Persistence were involved in a conspiracy with the ALE.  

I completely respect your right to that opinion.  I applaud you for caring enough to even have an opinion.  And more importantly, I even hope that you are right.

Unfortunately, I believe it's quite possible there's something hinky going on.  I believe that based upon the content Kyle's statements and the timing of events. 

ldstlou, I hope I'm wrong. 

But no matter where the search for the truth about what happened to Natalee leads, I'll go there.  Even if it were to lead back to Alabama (which we all know it doesn't), I would follow it.  No matter who it implicates. 

I think we can coexist with these different opinions, so long as you have as much respect for my opinion as I have for yours.



Thanks Lifesong..that means a lot to me.
I really have to get these guys to bed though. Taking my scouts with me again this weekend.
Have a good night everyone.
Let's all keep up the good fight!
No Justice for Natalee, No Tourist for Aruba!!
Good Night Lisa...Good Luck at the Show..Justice for Natalee!  ::MonkeyCool::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #797 1/30/09 -
Post by: Anna on January 30, 2009, 10:48:29 PM
The most despicable thing I have heard during all this is what Kermit told today about her information being given to the Arubans.  It is a sad day when that happens. 

JUSTICE FOR NATALEE
[/size][/size][/size][/color]



Yes, this is just beyond the pale.  Good thing that internet stalking is a crime in this country and sending the information abroad much more serious as any international connection would be these days.

And I know for a fact Kermit is not the only one receiving this kind of treatment.  I guess some think they have a right to all kinds of personal information about people when it does not concern them in any way whatsoever.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #797 1/30/09 -
Post by: Monkey Mia on January 30, 2009, 10:50:28 PM
Hello hotping.  I don't think I am that exciting.  LOL
Oh, Come on ... I bet You can do the Monkey Dance...Can't Ya its Easy! Watch... ::MonkeyDance:: ::MonkeyDance:: ::MonkeyDance:: lol


You are a hoot!
Just trying to make You feel Welcome!  ::MonkeyWink::


You have succeeded.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #797 1/30/09 -
Post by: Mere on January 30, 2009, 10:50:28 PM
I think we need to let go of the "job" as the basis of whether a poster should be believed.  I started at SM as a nurse...now I am a homemaker.  Do you have to have a certain level position to be believable?

I would like to look at the material, but you have spent so much time working on who has a "patriotic" job and exactly what it might be....

Kermit may have been a plumber but he/she was a freebird who brought information here and that information has been backed by others...and that is what matters to me.

 ::MonkeyWink::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #797 1/30/09 -
Post by: hotping on January 30, 2009, 10:50:41 PM
http://www.hollowaycase.com/archive/civil_court_docs/arubancounselfile.htm





Lots of info.

Interesting read.  This is the 5th suspect (joran, deepak, satish, steve croes and then:

Name: Freddy Alexander Arambaizis
Date: 13 June 2005 / 17:00
Pages: 5
Writer/Initiator. Johny Erasmus
Description: witness statement
That's interesting...I thought His last name had been determined to be Zedan or something different from Arambratzis..hmm.  ::MonkeyConfused::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #797 1/30/09 -
Post by: hotping on January 30, 2009, 10:52:16 PM
Hello hotping.  I don't think I am that exciting.  LOL
Oh, Come on ... I bet You can do the Monkey Dance...Can't Ya its Easy! Watch... ::MonkeyDance:: ::MonkeyDance:: ::MonkeyDance:: lol


You are a hoot!
Just trying to make You feel Welcome!  ::MonkeyWink::


You have succeeded.
Great!  ::cartwheel::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #797 1/30/09 -
Post by: Icehawk on January 30, 2009, 10:54:05 PM
http://www.hollowaycase.com/archive/civil_court_docs/arubancounselfile.htm



Thank you Icehawk.

I am not sure if I have ever seen that site before.

Interesting information on the never-ending Kalpoe case.

I wonder if they realized how long this kind of suit could in fact take and what the attorney fees could amass to be.






Lots of info.




You are very welcome Anna  ::MonkeyCool::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #797 1/30/09 -
Post by: klaasend on January 30, 2009, 10:54:22 PM
ok...night everyone!!

Nite ldstlou!  Hope all goes well at the travel boycott tomorrow!


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #797 1/30/09 -
Post by: Anna on January 30, 2009, 10:54:51 PM
I also think that if we don't have time to read the responses, we shouldn't make accusations in the first place.

That just doesn't seem right to me.  To accuse then refuse to even read the responses.

Well, I guess it is one way of preserving a certain point of view if only in ones own mind.

And, yes, people other than secret service do guard important people in the government and act as crowd control.  Not that it matters or a resume should be submitted with each post.

Asking for personal information has always been frowned on in the past.
Would those asking be willing to share all about themselves?  I would hope not because it's not safe with all the nutcases on the internet these days. 


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #797 1/30/09 -
Post by: Monkey Mia on January 30, 2009, 10:56:18 PM
Mere, I couldn't agree more.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #797 1/30/09 -
Post by: Anna on January 30, 2009, 11:05:39 PM
http://www.hollowaycase.com/archive/civil_court_docs/arubancounselfile.htm





Lots of info.

Interesting read.  This is the 5th suspect (joran, deepak, satish, steve croes and then:

Name: Freddy Alexander Arambaizis
Date: 13 June 2005 / 17:00
Pages: 5
Writer/Initiator. Johny Erasmus
Description: witness statement
That's interesting...I thought His last name had been determined to be Zedan or something different from Arambratzis..hmm.  ::MonkeyConfused::


Seems to depend on whom you ask, Hotping.  This is the name his brother uses, isn't it?  I think some take advantage of the Spanish tradition of having two last names and deliberately try to confuse. 

Then add in their five to ten nicknames and it is a miracle we even know who they are!


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #797 1/30/09 -
Post by: wreck on January 30, 2009, 11:07:19 PM
Okay, now where were we???  ::MonkeyConfused:: ::MonkeyHaHa::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #797 1/30/09 -
Post by: Tamikosmom on January 30, 2009, 11:07:46 PM

ok...then I am back where I started when this all started. I have two differing views on what happened and I am trying to discern the truth...credibility seems important to me.
I need to trust the messenger to trust the message.

At least six of the Freebirds have been here to confirm all that
Kermit has posted.  I find them far more credible than your sources.

Lou ... please share who is the originator as well as his/her differing view with the forum.

Kermit never came on the SM forum and claimed ... "I know something but I won't tell."  Kermit backed up his/her words with post after post after post after post.

Actually ... when Kermit gave Kyle Kingman the opportunity to expose those posts.  Kyle declined but ... he never denied that there were posts.

Janet

+++++


Kermit
Re: Natalee Case Discussion #786 12/17/08 -
« Reply #540 on: December 19, 2008, 06:15:18 PM »

Kyle sent me this today


Kermit,
 
You and the others agreed to a statement of confidentiality and nondisclosure at FB.  Before I posted any information, I posted a copyright notice at the very start which disallowed ANY and ALL of my posts, intellectual property, or pictures to leave the spot they were posted.  Everyone, including yourself, acknowledged this affirmatively. A lawyer said that ownership of that posted material cannot be transferred by a general claim of copyright such as a claim made on the front page of a website, or even by verbal consent. Written agreement, meaning a signed agreement, is required for the post to be owned by the site owner. Without a signed agreement, the poster owns the post. I did not give you permission, which I have stated many times when you were in violation. While the rest agreed, you violated this legal agreement repeatedly ...

http://scaredmonkeys.net/index.php?topic=4246.msg592482;topicseen#msg592482





Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #797 1/30/09 -
Post by: always 1 on January 30, 2009, 11:12:57 PM
Okay, now where were we???  ::MonkeyConfused:: ::MonkeyHaHa::
Look Wreck, 5000 posts!!!!!!!!


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #797 1/30/09 -
Post by: Anna on January 30, 2009, 11:14:19 PM
Okay, now where were we???  ::MonkeyConfused:: ::MonkeyHaHa::


Kind of hard to have any kind of discussion these days.


Well, there are those tapes that supposedly link Paulus to some Colombians.  I am particularly interested in those because as you will recall, I don't think Lorenzo involved in this in any way nor do I believe he is related to any Sloots.  However, he did have some Colombians employed or was connected to them at one time so this is the only possible connection to him I have ever seen and I am wanting to know if they could be the same Colombians by any chance.

And note I don't have to post all day every day every thing I don't believe and demand to be convinced of it.  I assume no one gives a rip what I believe or don't and we all have to think for ourselves.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #797 1/30/09 -
Post by: BUCKSHOT on January 30, 2009, 11:15:04 PM
THE PRODICAL SON

Luke 15:11-32 (NLT):

11 To illustrate the point further, Jesus told them this story: “A man had two sons.

12 The younger son told his father, ‘I want my share of your estate now before you die.’ So his father agreed to divide his wealth between his sons.

13 A few days later this younger son packed aLL his belongings and moved to a distant land, and there he wasted his money in wild living.

14 About the time his money ran out, a great famine swept over the land, and he began to starve.

15 He persuaded a local farmer to hire him, and the man sent him into his fields to feed the pigs.

16 The young man became so hungry that even the pods he was feeding the pigs looked good to him.  But no one gave him anything.

17 When he fina!y came to his senses, he said to himself, ‘At home even the hired
servants have food enough to spare, and here I am dying of hunger!

18 I will go home to my father and say, 'Father, I have sinned against both heaven and you,

19 and I am no longer worthy of being ca!ed your son. Please take me on as a
hired servant.'

20 So he returned home to his father. And while he was still a long way off, his
father saw him coming. Filled with love and compassion, he ran to his son,
embraced him, and kissed him.

21 His son said to him, ‘Father, I have sinned against both heaven and you, and I am no longer worthy of being called your son.’

22 But his father said to the servants, ‘Quick! Bring the finest robe in the house
and put it on him. Get a ring for his finger and sandals for his feet.

23 And kill the calf we have been fattening. We must celebrate with a feast, 24 for this son of mine was dead and has now returned to life. He was lost, but now he is found.’

So the party began.

+++++++




Tamikosmom - "aka"...Shango Jr.
 ::MonkeyHaHa:: ::MonkeyDance:: ::MonkeyLaugh::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #797 1/30/09 -
Post by: wreck on January 30, 2009, 11:16:16 PM
Okay, now where were we???  ::MonkeyConfused:: ::MonkeyHaHa::
Look Wreck, 5000 posts!!!!!!!!
quality -- not quantity  ::MonkeyWink::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #797 1/30/09 -
Post by: BUCKSHOT on January 30, 2009, 11:18:33 PM


But, if he did really dive --  a boat would have had to take him out to the dive location. It was not right off shore.

How did the boat know where to go??

That's sort of a 'needle in the haystack' analogy. Someone HAD to have given CAPS or the Boat driver the location of the cage. WHO WOULD KNOW THAT other than the crew of the Persistence or ALE

Am I the only one that finds that hinky??

Don't worry -- I'm used to hearing 'yes'  ::MonkeyLaugh::
.



Yes.







Just kidding dear!!!!!  ::MonkeyTongue::

that is most definitely hinky. Especially after we were told that all target locations were kept in a "safe, locked location, only known by two people"

Eenie--Meenie--Miney--Moe--Catch--Aruba--by--the--toe...
Lucky guess where the trap was...

 ::MonkeyNoNo:: ::MonkeyShocked:: ::MonkeyConfused::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #797 1/30/09 -
Post by: always 1 on January 30, 2009, 11:18:50 PM
Okay, now where were we???  ::MonkeyConfused:: ::MonkeyHaHa::
Look Wreck, 5000 posts!!!!!!!!
quality -- not quantity  ::MonkeyWink::
Hahahahahahahahahaha.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #797 1/30/09 -
Post by: Anna on January 30, 2009, 11:19:26 PM

ok...then I am back where I started when this all started. I have two differing views on what happened and I am trying to discern the truth...credibility seems important to me.
I need to trust the messenger to trust the message.  

At least six of the Freebirds have been here to confirm all that
Kermit has posted.  I find them far more credible than your sources.

Lou ... please share who is the originator as well as his/her differing view with the forum.

Kermit never came on the SM forum and claimed ... "I know something but I won't tell."  Kermit backed up his/her words with post after post after post after post.

Actually ... when Kermit gave Kyle Kingman the opportunity to expose those posts.  Kyle declined but ... he never denied that there were posts.

Janet

+++++


Kermit
Re: Natalee Case Discussion #786 12/17/08 -
« Reply #540 on: December 19, 2008, 06:15:18 PM »

Kyle sent me this today


Kermit,
 
You and the others agreed to a statement of confidentiality and nondisclosure at FB.  Before I posted any information, I posted a copyright notice at the very start which disallowed ANY and ALL of my posts, intellectual property, or pictures to leave the spot they were posted.  Everyone, including yourself, acknowledged this affirmatively. A lawyer said that ownership of that posted material cannot be transferred by a general claim of copyright such as a claim made on the front page of a website, or even by verbal consent. Written agreement, meaning a signed agreement, is required for the post to be owned by the site owner. Without a signed agreement, the poster owns the post. I did not give you permission, which I have stated many times when you were in violation. While the rest agreed, you violated this legal agreement repeatedly ...

http://scaredmonkeys.net/index.php?topic=4246.msg592482;topicseen#msg592482







Well, the SOURCE of the information is KYLE.

I give up. . . . .it's just impossible!   :2brickwall:


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #797 1/30/09 -
Post by: Tamikosmom on January 30, 2009, 11:21:01 PM
http://www.hollowaycase.com/archive/civil_court_docs/arubancounselfile.htm





Lots of info.

Interesting read.  This is the 5th suspect (joran, deepak, satish, steve croes and then:

Name: Freddy Alexander Arambaizis
Date: 13 June 2005 / 17:00
Pages: 5
Writer/Initiator. Johny Erasmus
Description: witness statement

Freddy was never a suspect ... he was only questioned as a witness in the Natalee Holloway case.  Freddy was detained as a suspect in August 2005 when Deepak and Satish Kalpoe were rearrested but ... the detention was unrelated to the Natalee Holloway case.

Janet

+++++++


Aruba Authorities Detail Murder Suspicions
Friday, June 24, 2005


Joran van der Sloot (search) and his friends Deepak and Satish Kalpoe are being held under suspicion of murder and kidnapping as well as being an accessory to murder.

A fourth man, party boat DJ Steve Croes, is being held under the same conditions.

The fifth man, Paul van der Sloot (search) — the father of 17-year-old Joran — was being held on suspicion of complicity to pre-meditated murder, complicity to kidnapping and murder and kidnapping. Under the Aruban system, complicity is a lesser charge.

http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,160654,00.html


Aruba Suspects Accused of Taking Sex Photos of Another Girl
Thursday, September 01, 2005


The Kalpoe brothers were released July 4 and rearrested last week with a friend of the three young men, Freddy Alexander Zedan-Arambatzis (search), 21.
 
Zedan-Arambatzis, who is not suspected of involvement in the Holloway case, is accused of taking photos of a minor female in "tempting poses" and of showing the photos to other people, said his lawyer, Diana Emerencia. He is also suspected of having unspecified "physical contact" with the girl, she said.

The Kalpoe brothers and van der Sloot are also suspected of involvement in the incident, which allegedly occurred before Holloway disappeared, Emerencia said.

http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,168233,00.html


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #797 1/30/09 -
Post by: Anna on January 30, 2009, 11:22:07 PM
Okay, now where were we???  ::MonkeyConfused:: ::MonkeyHaHa::
Look Wreck, 5000 posts!!!!!!!!
quality -- not quantity  ::MonkeyWink::


Hey, watch that!  But seriously, Wreck, you have been here forever and we have posted together since I don't know when so I was surprised that she has more posts than you do.

You are not meeting your quota!
j/k  You are a poster of few words but important ones.



Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #797 1/30/09 -
Post by: Magnolia on January 30, 2009, 11:24:00 PM

ok...then I am back where I started when this all started. I have two differing views on what happened and I am trying to discern the truth...credibility seems important to me.
I need to trust the messenger to trust the message.  

At least six of the Freebirds have been here to confirm all that
Kermit has posted.  I find them far more credible than your sources.

Lou ... please share who is the originator as well as his/her differing view with the forum.

Kermit never came on the SM forum and claimed ... "I know something but I won't tell."  Kermit backed up his/her words with post after post after post after post.

Actually ... when Kermit gave Kyle Kingman the opportunity to expose those posts.  Kyle declined but ... he never denied that there were posts.

Janet

+++++


Kermit
Re: Natalee Case Discussion #786 12/17/08 -
« Reply #540 on: December 19, 2008, 06:15:18 PM »

Kyle sent me this today


Kermit,
 
You and the others agreed to a statement of confidentiality and nondisclosure at FB.  Before I posted any information, I posted a copyright notice at the very start which disallowed ANY and ALL of my posts, intellectual property, or pictures to leave the spot they were posted.  Everyone, including yourself, acknowledged this affirmatively. A lawyer said that ownership of that posted material cannot be transferred by a general claim of copyright such as a claim made on the front page of a website, or even by verbal consent. Written agreement, meaning a signed agreement, is required for the post to be owned by the site owner. Without a signed agreement, the poster owns the post. I did not give you permission, which I have stated many times when you were in violation. While the rest agreed, you violated this legal agreement repeatedly ...

http://scaredmonkeys.net/index.php?topic=4246.msg592482;topicseen#msg592482







Well, the SOURCE of the information is KYLE.

I give up. . . . .it's just impossible!   :2brickwall:

And Jug and Lalas and Hotshot and who knows who else.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #797 1/30/09 -
Post by: Tamikosmom on January 30, 2009, 11:24:38 PM
THE PRODICAL SON

Luke 15:11-32 (NLT):

11 To illustrate the point further, Jesus told them this story: “A man had two sons.

12 The younger son told his father, ‘I want my share of your estate now before you die.’ So his father agreed to divide his wealth between his sons.

13 A few days later this younger son packed aLL his belongings and moved to a distant land, and there he wasted his money in wild living.

14 About the time his money ran out, a great famine swept over the land, and he began to starve.

15 He persuaded a local farmer to hire him, and the man sent him into his fields to feed the pigs.

16 The young man became so hungry that even the pods he was feeding the pigs looked good to him.  But no one gave him anything.

17 When he fina!y came to his senses, he said to himself, ‘At home even the hired
servants have food enough to spare, and here I am dying of hunger!

18 I will go home to my father and say, 'Father, I have sinned against both heaven and you,

19 and I am no longer worthy of being ca!ed your son. Please take me on as a
hired servant.'

20 So he returned home to his father. And while he was still a long way off, his
father saw him coming. Filled with love and compassion, he ran to his son,
embraced him, and kissed him.

21 His son said to him, ‘Father, I have sinned against both heaven and you, and I am no longer worthy of being called your son.’

22 But his father said to the servants, ‘Quick! Bring the finest robe in the house
and put it on him. Get a ring for his finger and sandals for his feet.

23 And kill the calf we have been fattening. We must celebrate with a feast, 24 for this son of mine was dead and has now returned to life. He was lost, but now he is found.’

So the party began.

+++++++




Tamikosmom - "aka"...Shango Jr.
 ::MonkeyHaHa:: ::MonkeyDance:: ::MonkeyLaugh::


 ::MonkeyShocked::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #797 1/30/09 -
Post by: BUCKSHOT on January 30, 2009, 11:24:58 PM

I find it very telling that they stayed for 4 months and the only human dive was the one done on the cage, which Silvetti & Trehan claim contained nothing.


I have not heard of any action by Beth or Dave (or Jug) to 'fund' the dives for the remaining 100+ 'viable' targets.

I also find that odd.

And I asked this before - but I'll ask again -- how EXACTLY did CAPS know where to dive to find the cage????

In other words -- who gave him the coordinates of the location?? Or was he swimming around in 90' of ocean water and stumbled upon it??

Inquiring minds want to know.


CapsLockWizard
"Another thing , I went to dive a week a go to the same location, and the Cage is still there. If the cage was evidance in a murder case, why is it still in the water."

http://scaredmonkeys.net/index.php?topic=4182.msg564838#msg564838

Of course, this is same post in which Caps said: "on the opening a business in Aruba... no way true. Need an Arubian Partner and the Business law for AVV or ofshore business registered in Aruba is not benefecial." 

And didn't I just see information and links posted in the last day or two that proved that to be untrue?  Is it possible he doesn't dive at all and was just making it up?  Of course, it's possible...
 :smt102


But, if he did really dive --  a boat would have had to take him out to the dive location. It was not right off shore.

How did the boat know where to go??

That's sort of a 'needle in the haystack' analogy. Someone HAD to have given CAPS or the Boat driver the location of the cage. WHO WOULD KNOW THAT other than the crew of the Persistence or ALE

Am I the only one that finds that hinky??

Don't worry -- I'm used to hearing 'yes'  ::MonkeyLaugh::
.

I think it would be hinky if we didn't already know/believe that Caps is associated with ALE/AHATA.  Was Clyde Burke driving the boat? ::MonkeyEek::


Word of the Day:  Hinky
 ::MonkeyWink:: ::MonkeyHaHa::

You may be on to something Lifesong! ::MonkeyWink::

Don't forget...Aruba uses AHATA as part-time judicial personell...
Just imagine the president of Mariott on the Supreme Court...
Alene Schippers = Paris Hilton


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #797 1/30/09 -
Post by: hotping on January 30, 2009, 11:25:28 PM
http://www.hollowaycase.com/archive/civil_court_docs/arubancounselfile.htm





Lots of info.


Interesting read.  This is the 5th suspect (joran, deepak, satish, steve croes and then:

Name: Freddy Alexander Arambaizis
Date: 13 June 2005 / 17:00
Pages: 5
Writer/Initiator. Johny Erasmus
Description: witness statement
That's interesting...I thought His last name had been determined to be Zedan or something different from Arambratzis..hmm.  ::MonkeyConfused::


Seems to depend on whom you ask, Hotping.  This is the name his brother uses, isn't it?  I think some take advantage of the Spanish tradition of having two last names and deliberately try to confuse. 

Then add in their five to ten nicknames and it is a miracle we even know who they are!
I guess what I meant was that it seems on a legal document that They would use Your legal name which in Freddy's case could be Arends, Zedan Rodriguez or Armabatzis...there could be more for all I know..but I have to remember that Aruba doesn't do things the legal way...  ::MonkeyEek::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #797 1/30/09 -
Post by: wreck on January 30, 2009, 11:25:41 PM
Okay, now where were we???  ::MonkeyConfused:: ::MonkeyHaHa::
Look Wreck, 5000 posts!!!!!!!!
quality -- not quantity  ::MonkeyWink::


Hey, watch that!  But seriously, Wreck, you have been here forever and we have posted together since I don't know when so I was surprised that she has more posts than you do.

You are not meeting your quota!
j/k  You are a poster of few words but important ones.


I was a little more prolific at RWV before I joined SM. I posted front page mostly here.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #797 1/30/09 -
Post by: Anna on January 30, 2009, 11:27:15 PM
1/11/06 - "The release said that the team in charge of the investigation in the case of the disappearance of Natalee Holloway, has a strong suspicion that the young women in question lost her life as a consequence of a punishable offence committed against her."
http://getagripmonkey.blogspot.com/search?q=Petition

Credit: Igsigs



Isn't that what this is all about? 


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #797 1/30/09 -
Post by: BUCKSHOT on January 30, 2009, 11:30:07 PM
I think that Kyle posted something about an underwater vacuum
that could be taken to the cage and possible DNA retrieved from
the site.
I have wondered if Caps went there (if he actually did) to make
sure that there was nothing to vacuum up.

That's a possibility Magnolia. I thought it odd that there were no 'photos' accompanying the post.

I'm not a diver, but I know that inexperienced divers do not go down 90'. On a whim. I don't recall seeing CAPS ever discussing that he was an experienced diver. But it's possible.

Yes Lifesong -- I've read all the posts about CAPS and the ALE connections. This innocuous little post however, confirmed it for me. :-(  Again, right from CAPS himself.

So, do we assume that the 100+ 'viable target' locations are no longer in safe keeping either?

Yes -- sometimes I like to state the obvious. For me, it reinforces the level of lieing and corruption and coverup.

JUSTICE FOR NATALEE

Caps dove them already...
Clyde Burke took him out in a paddleboat...
 ::MonkeyShocked:: ::MonkeyHaHa::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #797 1/30/09 -
Post by: Tamikosmom on January 30, 2009, 11:30:33 PM

ok...then I am back where I started when this all started. I have two differing views on what happened and I am trying to discern the truth...credibility seems important to me.
I need to trust the messenger to trust the message.  

At least six of the Freebirds have been here to confirm all that
Kermit has posted.  I find them far more credible than your sources.

Lou ... please share who is the originator as well as his/her differing view with the forum.

Kermit never came on the SM forum and claimed ... "I know something but I won't tell."  Kermit backed up his/her words with post after post after post after post.

Actually ... when Kermit gave Kyle Kingman the opportunity to expose those posts.  Kyle declined but ... he never denied that there were posts.

Janet

+++++


Kermit
Re: Natalee Case Discussion #786 12/17/08 -
« Reply #540 on: December 19, 2008, 06:15:18 PM »

Kyle sent me this today


Kermit,
 
You and the others agreed to a statement of confidentiality and nondisclosure at FB.  Before I posted any information, I posted a copyright notice at the very start which disallowed ANY and ALL of my posts, intellectual property, or pictures to leave the spot they were posted.  Everyone, including yourself, acknowledged this affirmatively. A lawyer said that ownership of that posted material cannot be transferred by a general claim of copyright such as a claim made on the front page of a website, or even by verbal consent. Written agreement, meaning a signed agreement, is required for the post to be owned by the site owner. Without a signed agreement, the poster owns the post. I did not give you permission, which I have stated many times when you were in violation. While the rest agreed, you violated this legal agreement repeatedly ...

http://scaredmonkeys.net/index.php?topic=4246.msg592482;topicseen#msg592482







Well, the SOURCE of the information is KYLE.

I give up. . . . .it's just impossible!   :2brickwall:

And Jug and Lalas and Hotshot and who knows who else.

I really do not want to go there Magnolia.

Lalas and Hotshot are John Silvetti supporters but ... I do not think for one minute that Jug would uphold John Silvetti if he was aware of the complete compilation of Kyle Kingman's own words as well as the second set of ROV images.

Jug may have suspected that the Persistence undertaking was two-fold but ... so did many internet posters.

Janet


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #797 1/30/09 -
Post by: Anna on January 30, 2009, 11:32:28 PM
Janet,

I just noticed that you passed a milestone in posts, too.  Now you have a title.  I was told that I could post things to counter Blah with this title and even arrest him.  Now he isn't even here to argue with me.  And I miss him and others who should be here as well.

But we must be thankful for the glass being half full and that there are as many of us still posting as there are.  I guess from time to time we are tested.  And yet we remain as determined as ever that Natalee and her family deserve justice no matter who or what tries to deter us from that course.





Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #797 1/30/09 -
Post by: 2NJSons_Mom on January 30, 2009, 11:34:20 PM
Okay, now where were we???  ::MonkeyConfused:: ::MonkeyHaHa::
Look Wreck, 5000 posts!!!!!!!!
quality -- not quantity  ::MonkeyWink::


Hey, watch that!  But seriously, Wreck, you have been here forever and we have posted together since I don't know when so I was surprised that she has more posts than you do.

You are not meeting your quota!
j/k  You are a poster of few words but important ones.



Many, but not all posters lost their post count with the crashes.  I am one.  I would venture to guess that Wreck was one of those.  It doesn't matter, because we know, as you've said that his posts are important.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #797 1/30/09 -
Post by: Magnolia on January 30, 2009, 11:35:19 PM

ok...then I am back where I started when this all started. I have two differing views on what happened and I am trying to discern the truth...credibility seems important to me.
I need to trust the messenger to trust the message.  

At least six of the Freebirds have been here to confirm all that
Kermit has posted.  I find them far more credible than your sources.

Lou ... please share who is the originator as well as his/her differing view with the forum.

Kermit never came on the SM forum and claimed ... "I know something but I won't tell."  Kermit backed up his/her words with post after post after post after post.

Actually ... when Kermit gave Kyle Kingman the opportunity to expose those posts.  Kyle declined but ... he never denied that there were posts.

Janet

+++++


Kermit
Re: Natalee Case Discussion #786 12/17/08 -
« Reply #540 on: December 19, 2008, 06:15:18 PM »

Kyle sent me this today


Kermit,
 
You and the others agreed to a statement of confidentiality and nondisclosure at FB.  Before I posted any information, I posted a copyright notice at the very start which disallowed ANY and ALL of my posts, intellectual property, or pictures to leave the spot they were posted.  Everyone, including yourself, acknowledged this affirmatively. A lawyer said that ownership of that posted material cannot be transferred by a general claim of copyright such as a claim made on the front page of a website, or even by verbal consent. Written agreement, meaning a signed agreement, is required for the post to be owned by the site owner. Without a signed agreement, the poster owns the post. I did not give you permission, which I have stated many times when you were in violation. While the rest agreed, you violated this legal agreement repeatedly ...

http://scaredmonkeys.net/index.php?topic=4246.msg592482;topicseen#msg592482







Well, the SOURCE of the information is KYLE.

I give up. . . . .it's just impossible!   :2brickwall:

And Jug and Lalas and Hotshot and who knows who else.

I really do not want to go there Magnolia.

Lalas and Hotshot are John Silvetti supporters but ... I do not think for one minute that Jug would uphold John Silvetti if he was aware of the complete compilation of Kyle Kingman's own words as well as the second set of ROV images.

Jug may have suspected that the Persistence undertaking was two-fold but ... so did many internet posters.

Janet

Just quoting what ldstlou has said.  I always liked Jug and I am sure
that he is capable of coming here and reading for himself.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #797 1/30/09 -
Post by: BUCKSHOT on January 30, 2009, 11:39:09 PM
Kermit never said the email from Lala's was addressesd to him or sent directy from her to him.

Kermit never said the email from Lala's was addressesd to him or sent directy from her to him.

Kermit never said the email from Lala's was addressesd to him or sent directy from her to him.




Jug does know. He may just not be informing Idstlou
Re: Natalee Case Discussion #793 1/13/09
January 17, 2009, 06:21:44 PM »
Kermit ... who is "I".
/http://scaredmonkeys.net/index.php?topic=4371.660
XXXX:  Sat Nov 22, 2008 8:10 am    Post subject:    Reply with quote
Here is a snippet from an email I rec'd from Lalas.
I asked Jug about Schaeffer...he is the oil guy. He was the one that provided the cash to get down there. Silvetti knew he would get more business from Schaeffer if he mapped....while they were looking...the ocean floor. All the crew was asked to do was look for Natalee or anything suspicious as in small things like a cage or bones or whatever.
They do a large mapping process while they are looking for the details. Schaeffer would use the large mapping of the general layout of the ocean floor to further look for oil...etc...while they looked for Natalee too.

Silvetti was the one that offered to look for Natalee and not Schaefer


She did so Ana


(http://img136.imageshack.us/img136/8025/idstlouda0.jpg)





Idstlou --

Does that settle that minor difference of opinion?
Or is there somethng else?

BUCKSHOT

Once again, the frog has answered all questions aimed at it, and backed them up with fact...
There are others who have been extended the same offer to redeem/clarify/answer/rebutt (OE, Caps, Lalas) and have not done so.  Is this because they can not factual validate their posts? Or does the frog cat seem to have their tongue?


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #797 1/30/09 -
Post by: Tamikosmom on January 30, 2009, 11:48:42 PM
Janet,

I just noticed that you passed a milestone in posts, too.  Now you have a title.  I was told that I could post things to counter Blah with this title and even arrest him.  Now he isn't even here to argue with me.  And I miss him and others who should be here as well.

But we must be thankful for the glass being half full and that there are as many of us still posting as there are.  I guess from time to time we are tested.  And yet we remain as determined as ever that Natalee and her family deserve justice no matter who or what tries to deter us from that course.


OK ... that was 100 posts ago.

 ::MonkeyNoNo:: 

Hey ... maybe 11,000 is the magic number.  The edit option!!  Balloons!!  A congratulation letter from Red!!  Cash!!  Considering the exchange rate ... American currency will suffice.

 ::cartwheel::

GOOD NIGHT MONKEYS!!  GOOD NIGHT ZOOKEEPERS!!

Janet



Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #797 1/30/09 -
Post by: always 1 on January 30, 2009, 11:52:19 PM
Janet,

I just noticed that you passed a milestone in posts, too.  Now you have a title.  I was told that I could post things to counter Blah with this title and even arrest him.  Now he isn't even here to argue with me.  And I miss him and others who should be here as well.

But we must be thankful for the glass being half full and that there are as many of us still posting as there are.  I guess from time to time we are tested.  And yet we remain as determined as ever that Natalee and her family deserve justice no matter who or what tries to deter us from that course.


OK ... that was 100 posts ago.

 ::MonkeyNoNo:: 

Hey ... maybe 11,000 is the magic number.  The edit option!!  Balloons!!  A congratulation letter from Red!!  Cash!!  Considering the exchange rate ... American currency will suffice.

 ::cartwheel::

GOOD NIGHT MONKEYS!!  GOOD NIGHT ZOOKEEPERS!!

Janet


Nite nite Janet, (Im wearing that flannel gown)


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #797 1/30/09 -
Post by: Mere on January 30, 2009, 11:52:44 PM
Good night Janet...I would vote for the edit option.... ::MonkeyDance::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #797 1/30/09 -
Post by: Anna on January 30, 2009, 11:55:31 PM
Good night, Janet


No, nothing will happen.  But you can dream!

You with your edit button and me wanting the ignore one.

(http://i15.photobucket.com/albums/a360/AnnaBlueSkies/eb652fd2.gif)


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #797 1/30/09 -
Post by: BUCKSHOT on January 30, 2009, 11:55:54 PM
Kermit never said the email from Lala's was addressesd to him or sent directy from her to him.

Kermit never said the email from Lala's was addressesd to him or sent directy from her to him.

Kermit never said the email from Lala's was addressesd to him or sent directy from her to him.




Jug does know. He may just not be informing Idstlou
Re: Natalee Case Discussion #793 1/13/09
January 17, 2009, 06:21:44 PM »
Kermit ... who is "I".
/http://scaredmonkeys.net/index.php?topic=4371.660
XXXX:  Sat Nov 22, 2008 8:10 am    Post subject:    Reply with quote
Here is a snippet from an email I rec'd from Lalas.
I asked Jug about Schaeffer...he is the oil guy. He was the one that provided the cash to get down there. Silvetti knew he would get more business from Schaeffer if he mapped....while they were looking...the ocean floor. All the crew was asked to do was look for Natalee or anything suspicious as in small things like a cage or bones or whatever.
They do a large mapping process while they are looking for the details. Schaeffer would use the large mapping of the general layout of the ocean floor to further look for oil...etc...while they looked for Natalee too.

Silvetti was the one that offered to look for Natalee and not Schaefer


She did so Ana


(http://img136.imageshack.us/img136/8025/idstlouda0.jpg)





I think that ldstlou has a reading comprehension problem.
She only comprehends what she believes.
No matter how one tries to explain to her ...she will not
accept the answers.
   I think she is a hopeless case.

You are correct Magnolia.

or maybe I just copied the wrong post...dear lawdy

How about this one?

Quote
71   Natalee Holloway / Natalee Holloway / Re: Natalee Case Discussion #795 1/23/09 -  on: January 27, 2009, 12:35:23 AM 
oceanexploration
I haven't seen Kermit post anything untrue presented as factual.
http://scaredmonkeys.net/index.php?topic=4153.660



Sat Nov 22, 2008
Here is a snippet from an email I rec'd from Lalas.

I asked Jug about Schaeffer...he is the oil guy. He was the one that provided the cash to get down there. Silvetti knew he would get more business from Schaeffer if he mapped....while they were looking...the ocean floor. All the crew was asked to do was look for Natalee or anything suspicious as in small things like a cage or bones or whatever.
They do a large mapping process while they are looking for the details. Schaeffer would use the large mapping of the general layout of the ocean floor to further look for oil...etc...while they looked for Natalee too.

Silvetti was the one that offered to look for Natalee and not Schaefer.



Isdtlou
So now you're trying to tell us that Jug Twitty lied to lalasmom or was it lalasmom lying to her friends?
 


I am still waiting for the answer to my question too...am I the only one that got the impression that Kermit was implying she worked for the Secret Service...of course it could just be that reading comprehension problem I have too. lol

I saw pics posted here by Kermit that lead me to believe she worked for the Secret Service or possibly FBI. I also saw posts of Monkeys thanking her for her service to our country. To me it is about credibility...so am I allowed to ask if Kermit worked for the Secret Service or am I the only one that even assumed so?

What the hey...going to get bashed anyways...so did Kermit work for the Secret Service as she implied or not?  It sure would help me a lot in regards to credibility if I knew I was not mislead about this issue.

Dentists and comedians "do" impressions...
 ::MonkeyWink::
Sorry if you got the wrong impression...get over it...Oopsie  ::MonkeyConfused::

What difference does it make? Really? Tell us on the forum where you work... ::MonkeyNoNo::
Kermit is backing up her words with facts and documentation...Disproving disinformation with fact, not fiction...
Lalas, OE, and Caps...Can not say the same for them...   ::MonkeyWaa::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #797 1/30/09 -
Post by: Tamikosmom on January 30, 2009, 11:57:01 PM
Janet,

I just noticed that you passed a milestone in posts, too.  Now you have a title.  I was told that I could post things to counter Blah with this title and even arrest him.  Now he isn't even here to argue with me.  And I miss him and others who should be here as well.

But we must be thankful for the glass being half full and that there are as many of us still posting as there are.  I guess from time to time we are tested.  And yet we remain as determined as ever that Natalee and her family deserve justice no matter who or what tries to deter us from that course.


OK ... that was 100 posts ago.

 ::MonkeyNoNo:: 

Hey ... maybe 11,000 is the magic number.  The edit option!!  Balloons!!  A congratulation letter from Red!!  Cash!!  Considering the exchange rate ... American currency will suffice.

 ::cartwheel::

GOOD NIGHT MONKEYS!!  GOOD NIGHT ZOOKEEPERS!!

Janet


Nite nite Janet, (Im wearing that flannel gown)

So you finally took my advise on how to cool down that red hot computer.  That black silk Philip Lim blouse, Lucky Brand Jeans and boots will do it every time.

Think about it.  Me and my flowered flannel nighty equates a computer that does not get red hot.

 ::MonkeyTongue::

Janet


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #797 1/30/09 -
Post by: Lifesong on January 30, 2009, 11:57:38 PM

Goodnight, Janet.  God Bless.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #797 1/30/09 -
Post by: Tamikosmom on January 30, 2009, 11:58:17 PM
Good night Janet...I would vote for the edit option.... ::MonkeyDance::

I want it all!!!

 ::MonkeyTongue::

Janet


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #797 1/30/09 -
Post by: hotping on January 31, 2009, 12:00:46 AM
Good night Janet...I would vote for the edit option.... ::MonkeyDance::

I want it all!!!

 ::MonkeyTongue::

Janet
Good Night Janet!  ::MonkeyHaHa::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #797 1/30/09 -
Post by: Lifesong on January 31, 2009, 12:08:58 AM
http://www.nasdaq.com/reference/200707/market_close_070507.stm

Louis E. Schaefer Jr., Chairman of Superior Offshore International Inc.,
presides over the opening bell.

 
Thursday July 5, 2007
from Nasdaq MarketSite
in New York's Times Square

(http://www.nasdaq.com/reference/200707/mc_070507a.jpg)


Sorry if these have already been posted, but these 2007 dates have me thrown for a loop.  ::MonkeyConfused::   ::MonkeyNoNo::




 


 


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #797 1/30/09 -
Post by: Tamikosmom on January 31, 2009, 12:10:13 AM
An update from Blonde.

Janet
9:10 PM PT

++++++

I just got home Mom is doing better and they lowered the OX to 35%
They want her to wake up and they may take the breathing tube out of her tomorrow.
The Dr's are shocked they can't believe how strong she is.
I pray  I have more time with her.
 Thank You All
Blonde


http://scaredmonkeys.net/index.php?topic=147.2220


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #797 1/30/09 -
Post by: Lifesong on January 31, 2009, 12:11:26 AM

Um.  ruh-roh.

All the pics showed on the preview....

Can one of you magical mods with the coveted edit button fix that?


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #797 1/30/09 -
Post by: Anna on January 31, 2009, 12:16:30 AM

Um.  ruh-roh.

All the pics showed on the preview....

Can one of you magical mods with the coveted edit button fix that?

I just clicked on the link to see the other three.

This is new to me, never saw those photos before.  And note this is DEEP and the one in bankruptcy is DEEPQ.  Ticker symbols.  Is it the same company?  Or are there two? 



Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #797 1/30/09 -
Post by: 2NJSons_Mom on January 31, 2009, 12:18:18 AM
Good night Janet...I would vote for the edit option.... ::MonkeyDance::

I want it all!!!

 ::MonkeyTongue::

Janet


Was just thinking about what your post count would be without edit requests...hmmmm, something to think about.     ::MonkeyHaHa::

As we say here in NJ....I think you have a prayer.  (just sayin')

G'nite.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #797 1/30/09 -
Post by: wreck on January 31, 2009, 12:19:23 AM

Um.  ruh-roh.

All the pics showed on the preview....

Can one of you magical mods with the coveted edit button fix that?

I just clicked on the link to see the other three.

This is new to me, never saw those photos before.  And note this is DEEP and the one in bankruptcy is DEEPQ.  Ticker symbols.  Is it the same company?  Or are there two? 


Not that it matters -- but I didn't know Schaefer was missing a leg.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #797 1/30/09 -
Post by: wreck on January 31, 2009, 12:21:28 AM
Good night Janet...I would vote for the edit option.... ::MonkeyDance::

I want it all!!!

 ::MonkeyTongue::

Janet


Was just thinking about what your post count would be without edit requests...hmmmm, something to think about.     ::MonkeyHaHa::

As we say here in NJ....I think you have a prayer.  (just sayin')

G'nite.
Did you see "Dumb and Dumber"??? ..... ".....so you're telling us there IS a chance?!!"  ::MonkeyCool:: ::MonkeyWink::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #797 1/30/09 -
Post by: 2NJSons_Mom on January 31, 2009, 12:21:57 AM

Um.  ruh-roh.

All the pics showed on the preview....

Can one of you magical mods with the coveted edit button fix that?

I just removed the ones that didn't work.  Something didn't seem right about the links.....but, we have seen the first one before.  Thank you for posting it, Lifesong.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #797 1/30/09 -
Post by: Lifesong on January 31, 2009, 12:26:09 AM

http://www.thefacts.com/story.lasso?ewcd=054bac688bc7c40c

Captain Elliott’s sells fishing operations

By Hunter Sauls
The Facts   

Published January 4, 2008

FREEPORT — As longtime owners of the charter fishing tour boats of Captain Elliott’s Party Boats pull out of the recreational fishing business — the new owner, Underwater Expeditions, is baiting their hooks.

Last January, the owners of Captain Elliott’s said they would be closing shop due to lack of profit and increased restrictions on red snapper fishing, their main attraction.

Since then, Kemah resident Louis Schaefer, chairman of Superior Offshore International Inc., a worldwide commercial diving company, has bought the two boats and is expected to close on a deal to buy the docks and buildings next month, said Casey Cundieff, vice president of Captain Elliott’s.

The first trip is scheduled for Jan. 18. They’ll be taking out the “Big E”, which can carry 105 people, on a 52-hour tour out for yellow and black fin tuna, said ship captain and Freeport resident Robert Poulsen.

“It’s going to be a lot of fun,” Poulsen said.
---
Casting a wide net

“We want to build recreational fishing as a major industry here in Freeport,” said Evonn Caraway, Underwater Expeditions office manager. While Captain Elliott’s dedicated their boats to fishing tours, Caraway said they are going to tailor their cruises to what their clients have in mind.

“We’ll be doing spear fishing, scuba diving, kayak shuttling and our main focus — offshore fishing,” Caraway said. “We’re not worried about the red snapper limits. So far, we’ve had no problems filling our books up.”

Not only will Underwater Expeditions be using the same boats and facilities as Captain Elliott’s, but they already have added another to the fleet, a 32-foot catamaran, and plan to add more, she said.

“We have the same captains, deckhands and everything, just new owners and new management,” she said.

They also held onto L.A. Cuban, the walking Rolodex of Captain Elliott’s. She has worked every position in the company since her first day in 1988.

“I know all the regular customers,” Cuban said with a smile.

The four-fish limit on red snapper per person, a federal regulation, is not a major concern for Underwater Expeditions, she said. Only a few of the dozens of clients who have called or made reservations have even mentioned the fish, Caraway said.

“To me grouper is better meat than snapper anyway, it’s lighter and less gamey,” Caraway said as she stood out on the docks near the 87-foot “Capt. Casey”, their older fishing boat, and the 133-foot “Big E”, the longer, sleeker 2005-model vessel. “Most people come out to fish whatever is in season.”
---
‘X’ marks the spot

Schaefer is not stopping there. He has also purchased the Bed and Breakfast next door to the docks, and the purchase of a new “expedition” ship is in the works, said Underwater Expeditions operations manager Jamie Stovall.

“If we’re going to do this, we’re going to do it right,” Stovall said. “We’re really excited about this acquisition.”

Until Underwater Expeditions can get a hold of their own boat, Schaefer is financing expeditions on other boats. One such expedition is currently out in Caribbean waters off Aruba looking for the remains of Natalee Holloway, an Alabama high school senior whose 2005 disappearance became a media sensation.

“We are also going to explore some sunken shipwrecks — for treasure,” Stovall said.

These expeditions are an interesting part of this investment, but not very profitable, Stovall said. The charter tour operations should make Underwater Expeditions break even, at least, he said.

“Louis believes that having fun in work is bigger and better than money,” Stovall said. “This isn’t a have-to business.”
---
Sailing to fairer seas

Even though the Big E and Capt. Casey have been sold to Schaefer, Captain Elliott’s Party Boats lives on as the parent company of Texas Crew Boats, Cundieff said. His father, Elliott Cundieff, started Captain Elliott’s in Freeport more than 30 years ago.

“As far as getting back in the fishing business, it doesn’t look like that will happen anytime soon,” Cundieff said.

In the meantime, the Cundieff family will be busy in their more profitable venture, Texas Crew Boats. The company’s seven, soon to be nine, $2 to $5 million boats ferry passengers, supplies, water, fuel and groceries out to offshore oil field workers, Cundieff said.

“The beauty part of the operation is they pay for the fuel and oil of our boats for each day we work,” he said. “So long as the jobs are steady, things are going well.”

Cundieff said he was relieved when Schaefer bought the recreational fishing boats. He didn’t see any profit in it.

“It was no secret that it wasn’t going well. Maybe he thinks he can do different stuff with it and make money,” he said. “The recreational fishing business is just too seasonal — I think we got lucky someone was willing to buy. I hope they’re able to maintain it.”


Until a deal is done on the docks, Cundieff said he would tie his personal fishing boat there. Afterward, he said he assumes he’ll be paying Underwater Expeditions monthly rent to leave his boat at the dock his family has owned for three decades.

“That’s going to feel a little strange,” he said.

Hunter Sauls covers Freeport for The Facts. Contact him at (979) 237-0153.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #797 1/30/09 -
Post by: BUCKSHOT on January 31, 2009, 12:27:14 AM
Idstlou:

(1) What is your explanation for items located in a crab trap (congruent with ocean disposal) that were accidentally filmed by the ROV? Why would Aruba seem so quick to want to control its contents...diving from a "police" type boat, retrieving something, then returning back to the "police" type boat? Those, who retrieved the contents of the cage, never announced to others of their findings? That is, after all, one of the purposes of the dive? Furthermore, no one has heard the ALE, nor Mos talk about it..Seemed somewhat, at the very least, a significant find to me...Did the suspicious divers have zip-lock baggies in their pockets? The pictures of the cage definitely contained more than just a little piece of fabric...What happened to the other unexplained object(s)? Things that make ya go HMMMMMMMMMMMM...

(2) Does it matter if Lalas emailed a frog or the LEAK of the toad to Lalas, who was in Jimmy Carters pants pocket, while Lalas was under Clinton's desk with a LEAK next to Kenneth Starr, while Kermit told SS that Freebirds and Kyle would have never told Lalas about the LEAK through an email while being in the Secret Service and attending six funerals, then using the LEAK at ChatnGrumble to insinuate that Lalas and the frog worked for the FBI?

 ::MonkeyConfused::

#2 was a rambling joke, but that is equivalent to the relevance of your wanting to know Kermit's occupation. Are you looking for a job? Who gives a shit what Kermit does for a living? Kermit posted Kyle's own words.

OK...All joking aside, please respond to (1) above...


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #797 1/30/09 -
Post by: Lifesong on January 31, 2009, 12:28:41 AM

Um.  ruh-roh.

All the pics showed on the preview....

Can one of you magical mods with the coveted edit button fix that?

I just removed the ones that didn't work.  Something didn't seem right about the links.....but, we have seen the first one before.  Thank you for posting it, Lifesong.

Thanks for the help 2NJSons_Mom!  I guess if I'm gonna swing down from the rafters this much, I'll have to learn my way around the cage!    ::MonkeyCool::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #797 1/30/09 -
Post by: truthseeker2 on January 31, 2009, 12:28:44 AM
An update from Blonde.

Janet
9:10 PM PT

++++++

I just got home Mom is doing better and they lowered the OX to 35%
They want her to wake up and they may take the breathing tube out of her tomorrow.
The Dr's are shocked they can't believe how strong she is.
I pray  I have more time with her.
 Thank You All
Blonde


http://scaredmonkeys.net/index.php?topic=147.2220


Thanks for the update.  The is great news.  I will continue to pray for Blonde and her mom.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #797 1/30/09 -
Post by: 2NJSons_Mom on January 31, 2009, 12:30:22 AM
I'm heading out for now.  Klaasend probably will pop in. 

G'nite.  See you all later.

Justice for Natalee.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #797 1/30/09 -
Post by: klaasend on January 31, 2009, 12:32:10 AM
Nite 2NJ


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #797 1/30/09 -
Post by: wreck on January 31, 2009, 12:36:12 AM
Don't look now -- I'm only 44,000 posts behind Klaas!  ::MonkeyEek::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #797 1/30/09 -
Post by: 2NJSons_Mom on January 31, 2009, 12:36:32 AM

Um.  ruh-roh.

All the pics showed on the preview....

Can one of you magical mods with the coveted edit button fix that?

I just removed the ones that didn't work.  Something didn't seem right about the links.....but, we have seen the first one before.  Thank you for posting it, Lifesong.

Thanks for the help 2NJSons_Mom!  I guess if I'm gonna swing down from the rafters this much, I'll have to learn my way around the cage!    ::MonkeyCool::



What I meant is that when I tried to repost the links they read the same as yours.  Klaas may see it and know what to do.  I am NOT all knowing!!!!       ::MonkeyWink::     You are very welcome.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #797 1/30/09 -
Post by: klaasend on January 31, 2009, 12:38:52 AM
Don't look now -- I'm only 44,000 posts behind Klaas!  ::MonkeyEek::

 ::MonkeyHaHa::  If I could give you 40,000 of mine I would


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #797 1/30/09 -
Post by: klaasend on January 31, 2009, 12:40:16 AM

Um.  ruh-roh.

All the pics showed on the preview....

Can one of you magical mods with the coveted edit button fix that?

I just removed the ones that didn't work.  Something didn't seem right about the links.....but, we have seen the first one before.  Thank you for posting it, Lifesong.

Thanks for the help 2NJSons_Mom!  I guess if I'm gonna swing down from the rafters this much, I'll have to learn my way around the cage!    ::MonkeyCool::



What I meant is that when I tried to repost the links they read the same as yours.  Klaas may see it and know what to do.  I am NOT all knowing!!!!       ::MonkeyWink::     You are very welcome.

Most likely for some reason the other photos couldn't be hotlinked from that website.  No big deal.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #797 1/30/09 -
Post by: Anna on January 31, 2009, 12:53:34 AM

http://www.thefacts.com/story.lasso?ewcd=054bac688bc7c40c

Captain Elliott’s sells fishing operations

By Hunter Sauls
The Facts  

Published January 4, 2008

FREEPORT — As longtime owners of the charter fishing tour boats of Captain Elliott’s Party Boats pull out of the recreational fishing business — the new owner, Underwater Expeditions, is baiting their hooks.

Last January, the owners of Captain Elliott’s said they would be closing shop due to lack of profit and increased restrictions on red snapper fishing, their main attraction.

Since then, Kemah resident Louis Schaefer, chairman of Superior Offshore International Inc., a worldwide commercial diving company, has bought the two boats and is expected to close on a deal to buy the docks and buildings next month, said Casey Cundieff, vice president of Captain Elliott’s.

The first trip is scheduled for Jan. 18. They’ll be taking out the “Big E”, which can carry 105 people, on a 52-hour tour out for yellow and black fin tuna, said ship captain and Freeport resident Robert Poulsen.

“It’s going to be a lot of fun,” Poulsen said.
---
Casting a wide net

“We want to build recreational fishing as a major industry here in Freeport,” said Evonn Caraway, Underwater Expeditions office manager. While Captain Elliott’s dedicated their boats to fishing tours, Caraway said they are going to tailor their cruises to what their clients have in mind.

“We’ll be doing spear fishing, scuba diving, kayak shuttling and our main focus — offshore fishing,” Caraway said. “We’re not worried about the red snapper limits. So far, we’ve had no problems filling our books up.”

Not only will Underwater Expeditions be using the same boats and facilities as Captain Elliott’s, but they already have added another to the fleet, a 32-foot catamaran, and plan to add more, she said.

“We have the same captains, deckhands and everything, just new owners and new management,” she said.

They also held onto L.A. Cuban, the walking Rolodex of Captain Elliott’s. She has worked every position in the company since her first day in 1988.

“I know all the regular customers,” Cuban said with a smile.

The four-fish limit on red snapper per person, a federal regulation, is not a major concern for Underwater Expeditions, she said. Only a few of the dozens of clients who have called or made reservations have even mentioned the fish, Caraway said.

“To me grouper is better meat than snapper anyway, it’s lighter and less gamey,” Caraway said as she stood out on the docks near the 87-foot “Capt. Casey”, their older fishing boat, and the 133-foot “Big E”, the longer, sleeker 2005-model vessel. “Most people come out to fish whatever is in season.”
---
‘X’ marks the spot

Schaefer is not stopping there. He has also purchased the Bed and Breakfast next door to the docks, and the purchase of a new “expedition” ship is in the works, said Underwater Expeditions operations manager Jamie Stovall.

“If we’re going to do this, we’re going to do it right,” Stovall said. “We’re really excited about this acquisition.”

Until Underwater Expeditions can get a hold of their own boat, Schaefer is financing expeditions on other boats. One such expedition is currently out in Caribbean waters off Aruba looking for the remains of Natalee Holloway, an Alabama high school senior whose 2005 disappearance became a media sensation.

“We are also going to explore some sunken shipwrecks — for treasure,” Stovall said.

These expeditions are an interesting part of this investment, but not very profitable, Stovall said. The charter tour operations should make Underwater Expeditions break even, at least, he said.

“Louis believes that having fun in work is bigger and better than money,” Stovall said. “This isn’t a have-to business.”
---
Sailing to fairer seas

Even though the Big E and Capt. Casey have been sold to Schaefer, Captain Elliott’s Party Boats lives on as the parent company of Texas Crew Boats, Cundieff said. His father, Elliott Cundieff, started Captain Elliott’s in Freeport more than 30 years ago.

“As far as getting back in the fishing business, it doesn’t look like that will happen anytime soon,” Cundieff said.

In the meantime, the Cundieff family will be busy in their more profitable venture, Texas Crew Boats. The company’s seven, soon to be nine, $2 to $5 million boats ferry passengers, supplies, water, fuel and groceries out to offshore oil field workers, Cundieff said.

“The beauty part of the operation is they pay for the fuel and oil of our boats for each day we work,” he said. “So long as the jobs are steady, things are going well.”

Cundieff said he was relieved when Schaefer bought the recreational fishing boats. He didn’t see any profit in it.

“It was no secret that it wasn’t going well. Maybe he thinks he can do different stuff with it and make money,” he said. “The recreational fishing business is just too seasonal — I think we got lucky someone was willing to buy. I hope they’re able to maintain it.”


Until a deal is done on the docks, Cundieff said he would tie his personal fishing boat there. Afterward, he said he assumes he’ll be paying Underwater Expeditions monthly rent to leave his boat at the dock his family has owned for three decades.

“That’s going to feel a little strange,” he said.

Hunter Sauls covers Freeport for The Facts. Contact him at (979) 237-0153.



I assume they were talking about two different expeditions?



Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #797 1/30/09 -
Post by: iris44 on January 31, 2009, 12:55:01 AM
http://www.iberianet.com/articles/2007/11/29/news/news/news00.txt

See the above link for an old news article with a lot of detail of who contacted who regarding the Persistence search.  I wasn't sure if it had already been posted here.  The article says TES contacted Schaefer and Schaefer contacted Silvetti.




Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #797 1/30/09 -
Post by: Lifesong on January 31, 2009, 12:57:07 AM
Quote
Natalee Holloway / Natalee Holloway / Re: The Ocean Search for Natalee Holloway Monday, November 26, 2007on: January 15, 2009, 02:09:07 PM 
Started by Blonde, Message by Blonde Relevance: 47.7%

http://www.iberianet.com/articles/2007/11/29/news/news/news00.txt

From here to Aruba

BY JEFF MOORE, THE DAILY IBERIAN
Thursday, November 29, 2007 12:37 PM CST

<snip>

John Silvetti said his company became involved in the search after he was contacted by Louis Schaefer, chairman of Superior Offshore International. Schaefer had been approached by Texas Equusearch, a non-profit organization that has been searching for Holloway for more than two years.

Schaefer asked Silvetti if he could provide the survey personnel and the geophysical equipment required for the search. After spending a weekend with Schaefer and Pam and Dave Holloway, Silvetti agreed.

“It ripped my heart out to hear them say that right now all they’re looking for is to have a funeral in Alabama,” Silvetti said. “What do you say to someone like that?”

Silvetti agreed to provide his equipment and primary survey vessel at well below cost, with Schaefer covering all out-of-pocket expenses. Silvetti said his staff volunteered its services for the project as well.  

“They said ‘You don’t even have to pay me. I just want to help,’” Silvetti said. “That just tells me we’ve got the right people on board.”

Marc Broussard, project manager for the Silvetti Group, said the company normally performs surveys looking for oil rigs and downed helicopters. Now, it will be using its high-resolution SONAR equipment to look for a body.

To upgrade its systems for the terrain in Aruba, Broussard said the Silvetti Group looked to its vendors, two of which are based in New Iberia.

Seatronics, located at the Port of Iberia, agreed to donate some of its high-tech electronic equipment to scan the ocean floor.

“I told (Silvetti) any opportunity that we had to go in on such a good cause, we would go in on it,” said Erik McGuire, vice president of Seatronics Inc.

“We’re more than happy to give the best effort possible to recover this girl for her family.”

Pro Log Inc. also stepped forth to provide a command center building where all of the surveying equipment will be stored. Like many people around the country, Pro Log Human Resources Director Heidi Parker said she has been following Holloway’s disappearance closely.

“We’re a family-owned business, so family is very important to us,” Parker said. “Anything we can do to help this family out is something that we’re going to do.”

After more than two years of searching, Texas Equusearch office manager Cheryl Lawless said she is hoping the organization’s fifth trip to Aruba will be its last. She said the venture would not be possible without the help of Schaefer, Silvetti and the other local companies.

“Nothing is being done to gain name recognition. This is to help these people,” Silvetti said. “Most of us have watched this on television, and I can only imagine the horror any parent would go through searching for their child in a foreign country.”


With a thank you and prayers for Blonde, I thought this was worth bringing over from the ocean search thread. 

So clearly, Tim Miller contacted Schaefer, who contacted Silvetti.  They had equipment donated.

And now I know why I was so surprised to read Kyle's comment referring to Silvetti paying his invoices and why I thought he had donated his time.

Well, at this point, all I can really say is if this search was hinky then it really is scandalous in many, many ways.

Schaefer also bought a house for 3.5 million in early May of 2007.  He certainly wasn't tightening his belt while his company was tanking and his shareholders were alledgedly being defrauded.

 ::MonkeyConfused::



Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #797 1/30/09 -
Post by: Lifesong on January 31, 2009, 01:00:00 AM

I assume they were talking about two different expeditions?



I assume they are too, Anna, I sure hope so.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #797 1/30/09 -
Post by: Tamikosmom on January 31, 2009, 01:06:26 AM
http://www.iberianet.com/articles/2007/11/29/news/news/news00.txt

See the above link for an old news article with a lot of detail of who contacted who regarding the Persistence search.  I wasn't sure if it had already been posted here.  The article says TES contacted Schaefer and Schaefer contacted Silvetti.




Natalee Holloway: Tim Miller of Texas EquuSearch Discusses Crab Trap, Clothing and DNA Found in Waters of Aruba
February 27, 2005 2008


"I've been trying to put this together for two and a half years...Louis Schaefer came forward with John Silvetti."
(transcript credit: texasmom)

Video:
http://scaredmonkeys.com/2008/02/27/natalee-holloway-tim-miller-of-texas-equusearch-discusses-crab-trap-clothing-and-dna-found-in-waters-of-aruba/


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #797 1/30/09 -
Post by: Lifesong on January 31, 2009, 01:09:24 AM
http://www.iberianet.com/articles/2007/11/29/news/news/news00.txt

See the above link for an old news article with a lot of detail of who contacted who regarding the Persistence search.  I wasn't sure if it had already been posted here.  The article says TES contacted Schaefer and Schaefer contacted Silvetti.




Thanks iris - good timing.   ::MonkeyWink::

I'm glad you're here - I have a question for you if you're inclined to discuss it.  Forgive me though if I've confused you with another poster.

I think I remember you stating previously that you didn't believe the Persistence theory because you didn't believe Kyle or something to that effect.  I think you were of the opinion that he had been accurately quoted, but you didn't believe him.

I'm curious of your reasoning.  I agree that people do lie, just can't really figure out what was in it for Kyle to contact the Freebirds and then lie to them.  Can you help me out with this?


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #797 1/30/09 -
Post by: Keepthefaith on January 31, 2009, 01:14:56 AM
Janet,

I just noticed that you passed a milestone in posts, too.  Now you have a title.  I was told that I could post things to counter Blah with this title and even arrest him.  Now he isn't even here to argue with me.  And I miss him and others who should be here as well.

But we must be thankful for the glass being half full and that there are as many of us still posting as there are.  I guess from time to time we are tested.  And yet we remain as determined as ever that Natalee and her family deserve justice no matter who or what tries to deter us from that course.


OK ... that was 100 posts ago.

 ::MonkeyNoNo:: 

Hey ... maybe 11,000 is the magic number.  The edit option!!  Balloons!!  A congratulation letter from Red!!  Cash!!  Considering the exchange rate ... American currency will suffice.

 ::cartwheel::

GOOD NIGHT MONKEYS!!  GOOD NIGHT ZOOKEEPERS!!

Janet



Goodnight Janet.The Hinky Tea.Was a joke.You've always had a voice of reason.Had to go to the daughter's talent show.Was awesome!Till tomorrow!


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #797 1/30/09 -
Post by: Tamikosmom on January 31, 2009, 01:22:28 AM
DISCREPANCIES

From here to Aruba
BY JEFF MOORE, THE DAILY IBERIAN
Published/Last Modified on Thursday, November 29, 2007 12:37 PM CST


John Silvetti said his company became involved in the search after he was contacted by Louis Schaefer, chairman of Superior Offshore International. Schaefer had been approached by Texas Equusearch, a non-profit organization that has been searching for Holloway for more than two years

http://www.iberianet.com/articles/2007/11/29/news/news/news00.txt


TIM MILLER - IN HIS OWN WORDS

Natalee Holloway: Tim Miller of Texas EquuSearch Discusses Crab Trap, Clothing and DNA Found in Waters of Aruba
February 27, 2005 2008


I've been trying to put this together for 2 12 years.  Louis Schaefer came forward with John Silvetti. (3:40)

Video:
http://scaredmonkeys.com/2008/02/27/natalee-holloway-tim-miller-of-texas-equusearch-discusses-crab-trap-clothing-and-dna-found-in-waters-of-aruba/


++++++++


BY JEFF MOORE, THE DAILY IBERIAN
Published/Last Modified on Thursday, November 29, 2007 12:37 PM CST[/b]

Silvetti agreed to provide his equipment and primary survey vessel at well below cost, with Schaefer covering all out-of-pocket expenses. Silvetti said his staff volunteered its services for the project as well.

“They said ‘You don’t even have to pay me. I just want to help,’” Silvetti said. “That just tells me we’ve got the right people on board.”

http://www.iberianet.com/articles/2007/11/29/news/news/news00.txt


KYLE KINGMAN - IN HIS OWN WORDS

Kyle
:  I did not feel the same and we had a major difference in opinion. He [John Silvetti] was the one who never pressed ALE to be completely open with us with the trap evidence. I would have forced them to. However, John was the one paying my invoices so I was forced to sit back and hope for the best.




Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #797 1/30/09 -
Post by: Tamikosmom on January 31, 2009, 01:25:07 AM
Janet,

I just noticed that you passed a milestone in posts, too.  Now you have a title.  I was told that I could post things to counter Blah with this title and even arrest him.  Now he isn't even here to argue with me.  And I miss him and others who should be here as well.

But we must be thankful for the glass being half full and that there are as many of us still posting as there are.  I guess from time to time we are tested.  And yet we remain as determined as ever that Natalee and her family deserve justice no matter who or what tries to deter us from that course.


OK ... that was 100 posts ago.

 ::MonkeyNoNo:: 

Hey ... maybe 11,000 is the magic number.  The edit option!!  Balloons!!  A congratulation letter from Red!!  Cash!!  Considering the exchange rate ... American currency will suffice.

 ::cartwheel::

GOOD NIGHT MONKEYS!!  GOOD NIGHT ZOOKEEPERS!!

Janet



Goodnight Janet.The Hinky Tea.Was a joke.You've always had a voice of reason.Had to go to the daughter's talent show.Was awesome!Till tomorrow!

Good Night Keepthefaith.  I am thankful you enjoyed yourself.  Family is where it is at!!

Janet


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #797 1/30/09 -
Post by: Keepthefaith on January 31, 2009, 01:27:55 AM
Janet,

I just noticed that you passed a milestone in posts, too.  Now you have a title.  I was told that I could post things to counter Blah with this title and even arrest him.  Now he isn't even here to argue with me.  And I miss him and others who should be here as well.

But we must be thankful for the glass being half full and that there are as many of us still posting as there are.  I guess from time to time we are tested.  And yet we remain as determined as ever that Natalee and her family deserve justice no matter who or what tries to deter us from that course.


OK ... that was 100 posts ago.

 ::MonkeyNoNo:: 

Hey ... maybe 11,000 is the magic number.  The edit option!!  Balloons!!  A congratulation letter from Red!!  Cash!!  Considering the exchange rate ... American currency will suffice.

 ::cartwheel::

GOOD NIGHT MONKEYS!!  GOOD NIGHT ZOOKEEPERS!!

Janet



Goodnight Janet.The Hinky Tea.Was a joke.You've always had a voice of reason.Had to go to the daughter's talent show.Was awesome!Till tomorrow!

Good Night Keepthefaith.  I am thankful you enjoyed yourself.  Family is where it is at!!

Janet

Family is wonderful!Everyday i'm given i'm thankful for because we all know who's time we're on!God's time!I've just got caught up and see that it was good to be gone cause i left my Feces suit at the store! ::MonkeyLaugh::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #797 1/30/09 -
Post by: iris44 on January 31, 2009, 01:35:54 AM
http://www.iberianet.com/articles/2007/11/29/news/news/news00.txt

See the above link for an old news article with a lot of detail of who contacted who regarding the Persistence search.  I wasn't sure if it had already been posted here.  The article says TES contacted Schaefer and Schaefer contacted Silvetti.



Thanks iris - good timing.   ::MonkeyWink::


I'm glad you're here - I have a question for you if you're inclined to discuss it.  Forgive me though if I've confused you with another poster.

I think I remember you stating previously that you didn't believe the Persistence theory because you didn't believe Kyle or something to that effect.  I think you were of the opinion that he had been accurately quoted, but you didn't believe him.

I'm curious of your reasoning.  I agree that people do lie, just can't really figure out what was in it for Kyle to contact the Freebirds and then lie to them.  Can you help me out with this?


Lifesong, did you actually post that article at the same time I posted the link to it? 

As for not believing Kyle, I like many others always thought his postings while on the ship were a little weird.  It's just my feeling that Kyle is a scammer; of course I could be wrong.  I also think that if Kyle had some good info to sell, someone would have already bought it, and we would have already seen it on TV or in the National Enquiror and he wouldn't be on message boards doing whatever he is doing.

I'm also sure all the various companies involved in the search took any charitable contributions that they possibly could on their corporate tax returns, and I am starting to think that possible potential IRS issues are what is keeping all the parties (including TES) quiet about this whole issue.  Maybe that's what the real secrets are about.  But if I were Natalee's family, I wouldn't care if they were searching for oil at the same time as long as they were also looking for her.  As far as I know, they searched for Natalee at no cost to her family, and the family is very grateful, so I think it's wrong for posters to slander them on this board unless it has been 100% proven that they have done something wrong.  It does seem suspicious, but we don't have all the facts. 

Do you also have this Hodges article in the Search Archives?  Hodges talks about talking with Tim Miller and Silvetti around Dec 29th.
http://forensicthoughtprints.com/aruba/default.html


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #797 1/30/09 -
Post by: iris44 on January 31, 2009, 01:46:09 AM
DISCREPANCIES

TIM MILLER - IN HIS OWN WORDS

Natalee Holloway: Tim Miller of Texas EquuSearch Discusses Crab Trap, Clothing and DNA Found in Waters of Aruba
February 27, 2005 2008


I've been trying to put this together for 2 12 years.  Louis Schaefer came forward with John Silvetti. (3:40)

“They said ‘You don’t even have to pay me. I just want to help,’” Silvetti said. “That just tells me we’ve got the right people on board.”



I think maybe Tim Miller was just saying Schaefer brought Silvetti to him, not that Schaefer and Silvetti came to him together.  Tim is sometimes a little confusing when he speaks in TV interviews.

Also, Silvetti didn't say that he did not pay them.  He just said that they said he didn't have to pay them.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #797 1/30/09 -
Post by: Keepthefaith on January 31, 2009, 02:06:24 AM
REE

"VMS, I speak for only myself, but I personally don't care what Kermit's occupation is.  IMO the emails she posted speak for themselves.  I have no problem with any of the emails posted, but I do take issue with the crap SS posted yesterday."

KERMIT

"Just so everyone here knows I am well aware of them giving that information over to Aruba too."   


KEEPTHEFAITH
I thought this was important to bring over in case you don't read the previous thread!




Giving personal information to Aruba! ::MonkeyEek::

BUMP  ::MonkeyEek::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #797 1/30/09 -
Post by: Keepthefaith on January 31, 2009, 02:12:03 AM

http://www.thefacts.com/story.lasso?ewcd=054bac688bc7c40c

Captain Elliott’s sells fishing operations

By Hunter Sauls
The Facts   

Published January 4, 2008

FREEPORT — As longtime owners of the charter fishing tour boats of Captain Elliott’s Party Boats pull out of the recreational fishing business — the new owner, Underwater Expeditions, is baiting their hooks.

Last January, the owners of Captain Elliott’s said they would be closing shop due to lack of profit and increased restrictions on red snapper fishing, their main attraction.

Since then, Kemah resident Louis Schaefer, chairman of Superior Offshore International Inc., a worldwide commercial diving company, has bought the two boats and is expected to close on a deal to buy the docks and buildings next month, said Casey Cundieff, vice president of Captain Elliott’s.

The first trip is scheduled for Jan. 18. They’ll be taking out the “Big E”, which can carry 105 people, on a 52-hour tour out for yellow and black fin tuna, said ship captain and Freeport resident Robert Poulsen.

“It’s going to be a lot of fun,” Poulsen said.
---
Casting a wide net

“We want to build recreational fishing as a major industry here in Freeport,” said Evonn Caraway, Underwater Expeditions office manager. While Captain Elliott’s dedicated their boats to fishing tours, Caraway said they are going to tailor their cruises to what their clients have in mind.

“We’ll be doing spear fishing, scuba diving, kayak shuttling and our main focus — offshore fishing,” Caraway said. “We’re not worried about the red snapper limits. So far, we’ve had no problems filling our books up.”

Not only will Underwater Expeditions be using the same boats and facilities as Captain Elliott’s, but they already have added another to the fleet, a 32-foot catamaran, and plan to add more, she said.

“We have the same captains, deckhands and everything, just new owners and new management,” she said.

They also held onto L.A. Cuban, the walking Rolodex of Captain Elliott’s. She has worked every position in the company since her first day in 1988.

“I know all the regular customers,” Cuban said with a smile.

The four-fish limit on red snapper per person, a federal regulation, is not a major concern for Underwater Expeditions, she said. Only a few of the dozens of clients who have called or made reservations have even mentioned the fish, Caraway said.

“To me grouper is better meat than snapper anyway, it’s lighter and less gamey,” Caraway said as she stood out on the docks near the 87-foot “Capt. Casey”, their older fishing boat, and the 133-foot “Big E”, the longer, sleeker 2005-model vessel. “Most people come out to fish whatever is in season.”
---
‘X’ marks the spot

Schaefer is not stopping there. He has also purchased the Bed and Breakfast next door to the docks, and the purchase of a new “expedition” ship is in the works, said Underwater Expeditions operations manager Jamie Stovall.

“If we’re going to do this, we’re going to do it right,” Stovall said. “We’re really excited about this acquisition.”

Until Underwater Expeditions can get a hold of their own boat, Schaefer is financing expeditions on other boats. One such expedition is currently out in Caribbean waters off Aruba looking for the remains of Natalee Holloway, an Alabama high school senior whose 2005 disappearance became a media sensation.

“We are also going to explore some sunken shipwrecks — for treasure,” Stovall said.

These expeditions are an interesting part of this investment, but not very profitable, Stovall said. The charter tour operations should make Underwater Expeditions break even, at least, he said.

“Louis believes that having fun in work is bigger and better than money,” Stovall said. “This isn’t a have-to business.”
---
Sailing to fairer seas

Even though the Big E and Capt. Casey have been sold to Schaefer, Captain Elliott’s Party Boats lives on as the parent company of Texas Crew Boats, Cundieff said. His father, Elliott Cundieff, started Captain Elliott’s in Freeport more than 30 years ago.

“As far as getting back in the fishing business, it doesn’t look like that will happen anytime soon,” Cundieff said.

In the meantime, the Cundieff family will be busy in their more profitable venture, Texas Crew Boats. The company’s seven, soon to be nine, $2 to $5 million boats ferry passengers, supplies, water, fuel and groceries out to offshore oil field workers, Cundieff said.

“The beauty part of the operation is they pay for the fuel and oil of our boats for each day we work,” he said. “So long as the jobs are steady, things are going well.”

Cundieff said he was relieved when Schaefer bought the recreational fishing boats. He didn’t see any profit in it.

“It was no secret that it wasn’t going well. Maybe he thinks he can do different stuff with it and make money,” he said. “The recreational fishing business is just too seasonal — I think we got lucky someone was willing to buy. I hope they’re able to maintain it.”


Until a deal is done on the docks, Cundieff said he would tie his personal fishing boat there. Afterward, he said he assumes he’ll be paying Underwater Expeditions monthly rent to leave his boat at the dock his family has owned for three decades.

“That’s going to feel a little strange,” he said.

Hunter Sauls covers Freeport for The Facts. Contact him at (979) 237-0153.

Very interesting isn't it Lifesong?As his former company,which he bailed on after selling off all his stocks is going bankrupt,Schaefer is out buying up other companies and spending millions on a search for Natalee Holloway!Now it doesn't take to much LOGIC in my book to see something is definitely wrong with this picture!

KEEPTHEFAITH


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #797 1/30/09 -
Post by: texasmom on January 31, 2009, 02:12:49 AM
1/31/2009 Awe Mainta Page 28

http://awemainta.com/home/

(http://i21.photobucket.com/albums/b258/texasmom55/Misc%20News%204/01312009AweMaintaPg28-1.jpg)

Papiamentu translation:

while cu visibility team is tell cu not have much crimen near of hotelnan three man is ranca bag of tourist once more one tourist italian cu is kedando at one highrise hotel, diarazon 9.30 of night, is bay at keep of strand-politie y is haci denuncia of ladronisia cu violencia. the is tell police cu the was canando, hour cu three man on mountainbike owing to happen near of ache, all three dress at black. the is tell cu one of the hombernan owing to ranca his bag black cu orange-coloured y owing to core bay. the is tell cu in the bag the had his visacard, key of bedroom y also his rijbewijs.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #797 1/30/09 -
Post by: Keepthefaith on January 31, 2009, 02:14:46 AM
1/31/2009 Awe Mainta Page 28

http://awemainta.com/home/

(http://i21.photobucket.com/albums/b258/texasmom55/Misc%20News%204/01312009AweMaintaPg28-1.jpg)

Papiamentu translation:

while cu visibility team is tell cu not have much crimen near of hotelnan three man is ranca bag of tourist once more one tourist italian cu is kedando at one highrise hotel, diarazon 9.30 of night, is bay at keep of strand-politie y is haci denuncia of ladronisia cu violencia. the is tell police cu the was canando, hour cu three man on mountainbike owing to happen near of ache, all three dress at black. the is tell cu one of the hombernan owing to ranca his bag black cu orange-coloured y owing to core bay. the is tell cu in the bag the had his visacard, key of bedroom y also his rijbewijs.


I understand there is crime everywhere but it does appear Aruba tends to have a bit more.That's just the stuff that's reported!


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #797 1/30/09 -
Post by: texasmom on January 31, 2009, 02:16:29 AM
REE

"VMS, I speak for only myself, but I personally don't care what Kermit's occupation is.  IMO the emails she posted speak for themselves.  I have no problem with any of the emails posted, but I do take issue with the crap SS posted yesterday."

KERMIT

"Just so everyone here knows I am well aware of them giving that information over to Aruba too."   


KEEPTHEFAITH
I thought this was important to bring over in case you don't read the previous thread!




Giving personal information to Aruba! ::MonkeyEek::

BUMP  ::MonkeyEek::


 ::MonkeyNoNo::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #797 1/30/09 -
Post by: texasmom on January 31, 2009, 02:21:30 AM
1/31/2009 Awe Mainta Page 28

http://awemainta.com/home/

(http://i21.photobucket.com/albums/b258/texasmom55/Misc%20News%204/01312009AweMaintaPg28-1.jpg)

Papiamentu translation:

while cu visibility team is tell cu not have much crimen near of hotelnan three man is ranca bag of tourist once more one tourist italian cu is kedando at one highrise hotel, diarazon 9.30 of night, is bay at keep of strand-politie y is haci denuncia of ladronisia cu violencia. the is tell police cu the was canando, hour cu three man on mountainbike owing to happen near of ache, all three dress at black. the is tell cu one of the hombernan owing to ranca his bag black cu orange-coloured y owing to core bay. the is tell cu in the bag the had his visacard, key of bedroom y also his rijbewijs.


I understand there is crime everywhere but it does appear Aruba tends to have a bit more.That's just the stuff that's reported!

Exactly.  IMO One of the main objectives of the Visibility Team is to see to it that the majority of the crimes ARE NOT reported.

Bet that tourist slept well that night, knowing someone had the key to their room....what about the next unsuspecting person that stays in that room?  Did the hotel rekey the door?  I DOUBT IT!  ::MonkeyRoll::



Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #797 1/30/09 -
Post by: billb's daughter on January 31, 2009, 02:40:55 AM
The drive by's are exhausting! I don't dare log on for fear of being mean....you know, attacking the poster and all....But...they are definitely trying to distract....how many times and in how many ways can you implore them to just back up their claims that Kermit and the Freebirds have it all wrong? They can't...so they ramble on about circular BS.....
Anyway...
Good night texasmom, Keepthefaith, Anna and 7 Guests are viewing this topic.
billb.. ::MonkeyCool::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #797 1/30/09 -
Post by: Keepthefaith on January 31, 2009, 02:42:01 AM
The drive by's are exhausting! I don't dare log on for fear of being mean....you know, attacking the poster and all....But...they are definitely trying to distract....how many times and in how many ways can you implore them to just back up their claims that Kermit and the Freebirds have it all wrong? They can't...so they ramble on about circular BS.....
Anyway...
Good night texasmom, Keepthefaith, Anna and 7 Guests are viewing this topic.
billb.. ::MonkeyCool::

I know BillB.Thank God i was at the daughter's Talent show!Goodnight ::MonkeyCool::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #797 1/30/09 -
Post by: texasmom on January 31, 2009, 02:43:37 AM
http://www.amigoe.com/artman/publish/printer_52139.php

Google translation:

Aruba
PR campaign calls Valero resistance
30 Jan, 2009, 14:14 (GMT -04:00)




ORANGE CITY - In a tegen' ad by lawyer and Dean of the Order of Lawyers, Ronald Wix is again short shrift to the facts Valero earlier this week in a publicity campaign presented.

This ad has already provoked a strong reaction from the Prime Minister Nelson Oduber said that it is misleading and incorrect. Not only that the government does not agree with the decisions of the Valero has Wix yesterday by placing its ad "facts on the refinery in Aruba" clear.

The 'subject' is Valero him for years to the heart, so let him know in his response and was now time for his opinion in question. It is about him that everyone an equal contribution to the community. The environment for him to play an important role because, according to him, these serious disadvantages, from the refinery. The reason for this action to start, according to Wix that Valero to place the ad campaign is launched to the political pressure in the face of the tax holiday which expires in two years. In his ad, he inter alia, that Valero paid no income tax, a special BBO scheme for them is affected but also that they enjoy a preferential treatment when it comes to granting work and residence permits.

No good neighbor
What Wix also allege that Valero's liability for environmental disasters, limited to a "ridiculous" amount and that Valero is a major environmental hazard for Aruba. In his ad suggests Wix that the refinery may be many things, but a good neighbor or a good citizen is not. "Through all these reasons, and there are many more, according to Wix, he felt called to express an opinion express. He says in his response to this newspaper that he is advertising a lot of responses received and only positive responses. Indeed, he says, is asked for the ad in English places, so that American tourists can know what Valero uitspookt here. "" I feel these comments further supported. For me, the last word has not yet said. "


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #797 1/30/09 -
Post by: billb's daughter on January 31, 2009, 02:44:32 AM
And another thing Darnit...
When the heck is ROBOTS going to come back and say...Where the Heck is billb!!
barsturd, darn stackaholic...don't get me started.....  ::MonkeyCool:: ::MonkeyLaugh:: ::MonkeyDance:: ::MonkeyDance::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #797 1/30/09 -
Post by: Keepthefaith on January 31, 2009, 02:46:19 AM
And another thing Darnit...
When the heck is ROBOTS going to come back and say...Where the Heck is billb!!
barsturd, darn stackaholic...don't get me started.....  ::MonkeyCool:: ::MonkeyLaugh:: ::MonkeyDance:: ::MonkeyDance::

Come on BillB.Give one up for ROBOTS

             I HATE EM ALL................................... ::MonkeyCool::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #797 1/30/09 -
Post by: billb's daughter on January 31, 2009, 02:51:15 AM
And another thing Darnit...
When the heck is ROBOTS going to come back and say...Where the Heck is billb!!
barsturd, darn stackaholic...don't get me started.....  ::MonkeyCool:: ::MonkeyLaugh:: ::MonkeyDance:: ::MonkeyDance::

Come on BillB.Give one up for ROBOTS

             I HATE EM ALL................................... ::MonkeyCool::
OK..one for the road, after all,im 99 yrs old.. ::MonkeyCool::
ROBITS HATES THEM ALL!!!
did i do it right/.... ::MonkeyEek::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #797 1/30/09 -
Post by: billb's daughter on January 31, 2009, 02:53:03 AM
And another thing Darnit...
When the heck is ROBOTS going to come back and say...Where the Heck is billb!!
barsturd, darn stackaholic...don't get me started.....  ::MonkeyCool:: ::MonkeyLaugh:: ::MonkeyDance:: ::MonkeyDance::

Come on BillB.Give one up for ROBOTS

             I HATE EM ALL................................... ::MonkeyCool::
OK..one for the road, after all,im 99 yrs old.. ::MonkeyCool::
ROBOTS HATES THEM ALL!!!
did i do it right?.... ::MonkeyEek::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #797 1/30/09 -
Post by: texasmom on January 31, 2009, 02:57:27 AM
The drive by's are exhausting! I don't dare log on for fear of being mean....you know, attacking the poster and all....But...they are definitely trying to distract....how many times and in how many ways can you implore them to just back up their claims that Kermit and the Freebirds have it all wrong? They can't...so they ramble on about circular BS.....
Anyway...
Good night texasmom, Keepthefaith, Anna and 7 Guests are viewing this topic.
billb.. ::MonkeyCool::

I agree billb.  Very exhausting...and in some cases just disgusting. 

I've lost all respect for some monkeys.  I don't believe anything they could say or do at this point would ever change that.   ::MonkeyNoNo:: 

Goodnight billb.   ::MonkeyCool::

 


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #797 1/30/09 -
Post by: Keepthefaith on January 31, 2009, 02:59:55 AM
And another thing Darnit...
When the heck is ROBOTS going to come back and say...Where the Heck is billb!!
barsturd, darn stackaholic...don't get me started.....  ::MonkeyCool:: ::MonkeyLaugh:: ::MonkeyDance:: ::MonkeyDance::

Come on BillB.Give one up for ROBOTS

             I HATE EM ALL................................... ::MonkeyCool::
OK..one for the road, after all,im 99 yrs old.. ::MonkeyCool::
ROBOTS HATES THEM ALL!!!
did i do it right?.... ::MonkeyEek::

BILLB IS TRYIN TO GET SOME STACKS IN BEFORE BED! ::MonkeyLaugh::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #797 1/30/09 -
Post by: Keepthefaith on January 31, 2009, 03:02:35 AM
And another thing Darnit...
When the heck is ROBOTS going to come back and say...Where the Heck is billb!!
barsturd, darn stackaholic...don't get me started.....  ::MonkeyCool:: ::MonkeyLaugh:: ::MonkeyDance:: ::MonkeyDance::

Come on BillB.Give one up for ROBOTS

             I HATE EM ALL................................... ::MonkeyCool::
OK..one for the road, after all,im 99 yrs old.. ::MonkeyCool::
ROBOTS HATES THEM ALL!!!
did i do it right?.... ::MonkeyEek::

BILLB IS TRYIN TO GET SOME STACKS IN BEFORE BED! ::MonkeyLaugh::


BILL didn't go to his stackaholic meeting tonight! ::MonkeyDance::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #797 1/30/09 -
Post by: texasmom on January 31, 2009, 03:03:49 AM
And another thing Darnit...
When the heck is ROBOTS going to come back and say...Where the Heck is billb!!
barsturd, darn stackaholic...don't get me started.....  ::MonkeyCool:: ::MonkeyLaugh:: ::MonkeyDance:: ::MonkeyDance::

Come on BillB.Give one up for ROBOTS

             I HATE EM ALL................................... ::MonkeyCool::
OK..one for the road, after all,im 99 yrs old.. ::MonkeyCool::
ROBOTS HATES THEM ALL!!!
did i do it right?.... ::MonkeyEek::

Not quite....let me remind show you!


I HATE EM ALL!!!!!!

 ::MonkeyWink::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #797 1/30/09 -
Post by: billb's daughter on January 31, 2009, 03:05:05 AM
And another thing Darnit...
When the heck is ROBOTS going to come back and say...Where the Heck is billb!!
barsturd, darn stackaholic...don't get me started.....  ::MonkeyCool:: ::MonkeyLaugh:: ::MonkeyDance:: ::MonkeyDance::

Come on BillB.Give one up for ROBOTS

             I HATE EM ALL................................... ::MonkeyCool::
OK..one for the road, after all,im 99 yrs old.. ::MonkeyCool::
ROBOTS HATES THEM ALL!!!
did i do it right?.... ::MonkeyEek::

BILLB IS TRYIN TO GET SOME STACKS IN BEFORE BED! ::MonkeyLaugh::
KTF...
You know the old saying...stack them up'... ::MonkeyDance::chug em down...
hiccup...burp,,,and all that.... ::MonkeyCool::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #797 1/30/09 -
Post by: texasmom on January 31, 2009, 03:06:38 AM
And another thing Darnit...
When the heck is ROBOTS going to come back and say...Where the Heck is billb!!
barsturd, darn stackaholic...don't get me started.....  ::MonkeyCool:: ::MonkeyLaugh:: ::MonkeyDance:: ::MonkeyDance::

Come on BillB.Give one up for ROBOTS

             I HATE EM ALL................................... ::MonkeyCool::
OK..one for the road, after all,im 99 yrs old.. ::MonkeyCool::
ROBOTS HATES THEM ALL!!!
did i do it right?.... ::MonkeyEek::

BILLB IS TRYIN TO GET SOME STACKS IN BEFORE BED! ::MonkeyLaugh::


BILL didn't go to his stackaholic meeting tonight! ::MonkeyDance::

 ::MonkeyLaugh:: 


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #797 1/30/09 -
Post by: billb's daughter on January 31, 2009, 03:14:48 AM
The drive by's are exhausting! I don't dare log on for fear of being mean....you know, attacking the poster and all....But...they are definitely trying to distract....how many times and in how many ways can you implore them to just back up their claims that Kermit and the Freebirds have it all wrong? They can't...so they ramble on about circular BS.....
Anyway...
Good night texasmom, Keepthefaith, Anna and 7 Guests are viewing this topic.
billb.. ::MonkeyCool::

I agree billb.  Very exhausting...and in some cases just disgusting. 

I've lost all respect for some monkeys.  I don't believe anything they could say or do at this point would ever change that.   ::MonkeyNoNo:: 

Goodnight billb.   ::MonkeyCool::

 
It is so disgusting.....it makes me sick..to do and say things to the family is beyond appalling...
The exposure of the depth of this cover up...persistence john s, louis s. kyle....HTF do they sleep at night?
At the end of the day...if our own FBI doesn't bring them all to justice, either directly or indirectly...I'll be extremely disappointed...But I know in my heart...Karma will bite them all....God has a plan and will deal with those responsible....
But on a lighter note...
I DO HATE THEM ALL...   


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #797 1/30/09 -
Post by: Keepthefaith on January 31, 2009, 03:17:17 AM
The drive by's are exhausting! I don't dare log on for fear of being mean....you know, attacking the poster and all....But...they are definitely trying to distract....how many times and in how many ways can you implore them to just back up their claims that Kermit and the Freebirds have it all wrong? They can't...so they ramble on about circular BS.....
Anyway...
Good night texasmom, Keepthefaith, Anna and 7 Guests are viewing this topic.
billb.. ::MonkeyCool::

I agree billb.  Very exhausting...and in some cases just disgusting. 

I've lost all respect for some monkeys.  I don't believe anything they could say or do at this point would ever change that.   ::MonkeyNoNo:: 

Goodnight billb.   ::MonkeyCool::

 
It is so disgusting.....it makes me sick..to do and say things to the family is beyond appalling...
The exposure of the depth of this cover up...persistence john s, louis s. kyle....HTF do they sleep at night?
At the end of the day...if our own FBI doesn't bring them all to justice, either directly or indirectly...I'll be extremely disappointed...But I know in my heart...Karma will bite them all....God has a plan and will deal with those responsible....
But on a lighter note...
I DO HATE THEM ALL...   

I hope it is like the old wiseman said.There's always calm before the storm! ::MonkeyCool::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #797 1/30/09 -
Post by: Keepthefaith on January 31, 2009, 03:20:49 AM
REE

"VMS, I speak for only myself, but I personally don't care what Kermit's occupation is.  IMO the emails she posted speak for themselves.  I have no problem with any of the emails posted, but I do take issue with the crap SS posted yesterday."

KERMIT

"Just so everyone here knows I am well aware of them giving that information over to Aruba too."   


KEEPTHEFAITH
I thought this was important to bring over in case you don't read the previous thread!




Giving personal information to Aruba! ::MonkeyEek::

BUMP  ::MonkeyEek::

Whatta ya think of this BillB? ::MonkeyEek::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #797 1/30/09 -
Post by: texasmom on January 31, 2009, 03:21:59 AM
The drive by's are exhausting! I don't dare log on for fear of being mean....you know, attacking the poster and all....But...they are definitely trying to distract....how many times and in how many ways can you implore them to just back up their claims that Kermit and the Freebirds have it all wrong? They can't...so they ramble on about circular BS.....
Anyway...
Good night texasmom, Keepthefaith, Anna and 7 Guests are viewing this topic.
billb.. ::MonkeyCool::

I agree billb.  Very exhausting...and in some cases just disgusting. 

I've lost all respect for some monkeys.  I don't believe anything they could say or do at this point would ever change that.   ::MonkeyNoNo:: 

Goodnight billb.   ::MonkeyCool::

 
It is so disgusting.....it makes me sick..to do and say things to the family is beyond appalling...
The exposure of the depth of this cover up...persistence john s, louis s. kyle....HTF do they sleep at night?
At the end of the day...if our own FBI doesn't bring them all to justice, either directly or indirectly...I'll be extremely disappointed...But I know in my heart...Karma will bite them all....God has a plan and will deal with those responsible....
But on a lighter note...
I DO HATE THEM ALL...   

I agree billb!  

And those that are choosing to attack those that have exposed the cover up are no better!  

Their words and deeds have no place in the pursuit of JUSTICE FOR NATALEE!  jmo


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #797 1/30/09 -
Post by: Keepthefaith on January 31, 2009, 03:23:02 AM
Goodnight to you all cageman,TM,and Anna!

GOD BLESS.........JUSTICE FOR NATALEE HOLLOWAY..................................................

..............ARUBA WILL PAY....................................................................................


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #797 1/30/09 -
Post by: Keepthefaith on January 31, 2009, 03:24:16 AM
Goodnight to you all cageman,TM,and Anna!

GOD BLESS.........JUSTICE FOR NATALEE HOLLOWAY..................................................

..............ARUBA WILL PAY....................................................................................

YOU TO KERMIT........................I STAND WITH THE FROGGY......................................


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #797 1/30/09 -
Post by: texasmom on January 31, 2009, 03:29:13 AM
Goodnight to you all cageman,TM,and Anna!

GOD BLESS.........JUSTICE FOR NATALEE HOLLOWAY..................................................

..............ARUBA WILL PAY....................................................................................

Goodnight Keepthefaith!  God bless you too!

 ::MonkeyCool::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #797 1/30/09 -
Post by: texasmom on January 31, 2009, 03:31:54 AM
(http://i21.photobucket.com/albums/b258/texasmom55/Natalee/ScreenShot003a.jpg)

TRUTH & JUSTICE FOR NATALEE!!!!!


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #797 1/30/09 -
Post by: Kermit on January 31, 2009, 04:41:55 AM
ARUBA COVER-UP

(http://i18.photobucket.com/albums/b104/Blondeonahd/persistence/PersistenceHansMosandRichardson.jpg)



Idstlou said: ”The footage WAS turned over to the FBI immediately.”http://scaredmonkeys.net/index.php?topic=4340.500
 Idstlou said: ”Sceen shots were sent daily as intructed by the FBI agents in charge, and the footage was turned over at the first opportunity.” http://scaredmonkeys.net/index.php?topic=4340.540
Idstlou said: “They were working with two FBI agents from Barbados. The footage was turned over to them.”http://scaredmonkeys.net/index.php?topic=4340.560

Idstlou said: “I know that there were members of Quantico on board. http://scaredmonkeys.net/index.php?topic=4340.580

"Klye:  I did not give the information to the FBI and I'm unaware of anyone relaying the possibility to them.
pg 39http://scaredmonkeys.net/index.php?topic=4340.760

Quote from: ldstlou on January 02, 2009, 05:46:43 PM
I stated that posters have said part of your credibility stems from taking down a president and working beside two others. I simply asked them to elaborate. You don't have to tell me a thing if you don't want to.

Why do you want personal information on Kermit?
http://scaredmonkeys.net/index.php?topic=4340.420




POOP SUIT ALERT



LEAK said: "This comment was made by Jug during a recent phone conversation:
All of the stuff that Kermit posted
<snip>
FBI did not know about it..."


Kyle was contacted by the FBI AFTER Freebirds sent the evidence/information to them.http://scaredmonkeys.net/index.php?topic=4340.420



CAPS HAS 4 COMPUTERS:
My brain cell + 4 Computers are thinking in all possible scenarios,
http://scaredmonkeys.net/index.php?topic=2539.120

CAPS POSTED:
Got an email today from DH, why took so long?
http://scaredmonkeys.net/index.php?topic=2539.160


I would like to know why on February 7, Caps is talking about this witness on scared monkeys,
this is the witness that would only talk to John through his lawyer, fear of reprisal, but yet Caps feels it's okay to tell the world about him on February 7!








Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #797 1/30/09 -
Post by: sharon on January 31, 2009, 08:06:37 AM
I think that Kyle posted something about an underwater vacuum
that could be taken to the cage and possible DNA retrieved from
the site.
I have wondered if Caps went there (if he actually did) to make
sure that there was nothing to vacuum up.

That's a possibility Magnolia. I thought it odd that there were no 'photos' accompanying the post.

I'm not a diver, but I know that inexperienced divers do not go down 90'. On a whim. I don't recall seeing CAPS ever discussing that he was an experienced diver. But it's possible.

Yes Lifesong -- I've read all the posts about CAPS and the ALE connections. This innocuous little post however, confirmed it for me. :-(  Again, right from CAPS himself.

So, do we assume that the 100+ 'viable target' locations are no longer in safe keeping either?

Yes -- sometimes I like to state the obvious. For me, it reinforces the level of lieing and corruption and coverup.

JUSTICE FOR NATALEE

Caps dove them already...
Clyde Burke took him out in a paddleboat...
 ::MonkeyShocked:: ::MonkeyHaHa::

 ::MonkeyLaugh:: ::MonkeyLaugh::

Thanks for that Buckshot. I love the visual  ::MonkeyLaugh::

I needed it -- after once again having to wade thru pages of a troublemaker attacking one of our own  :smt093 

That poster needs some kaopectate for her fingers.

 ::MonkeyNoNo:: ::MonkeyNoNo::



Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #797 1/30/09 -
Post by: sharon on January 31, 2009, 08:18:00 AM
http://www.iberianet.com/articles/2007/11/29/news/news/news00.txt

See the above link for an old news article with a lot of detail of who contacted who regarding the Persistence search.  I wasn't sure if it had already been posted here.  The article says TES contacted Schaefer and Schaefer contacted Silvetti.






Natalee Holloway: Tim Miller of Texas EquuSearch Discusses Crab Trap, Clothing and DNA Found in Waters of Aruba
February 27, 2005 2008


"I've been trying to put this together for two and a half years...Louis Schaefer came forward with John Silvetti."
(transcript credit: texasmom)

Video:
http://scaredmonkeys.com/2008/02/27/natalee-holloway-tim-miller-of-texas-equusearch-discusses-crab-trap-clothing-and-dna-found-in-waters-of-aruba/


Once again -- bless you and your superior organization skills, Janet.  :smt052

That poster would have actually had to READ here to have known that has been posted several times already.

Not a common characteristic for 'drive by's' intended to disrupt

 :smt075



Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #797 1/30/09 -
Post by: sharon on January 31, 2009, 08:30:42 AM
The drive by's are exhausting! I don't dare log on for fear of being mean....you know, attacking the poster and all....But...they are definitely trying to distract....how many times and in how many ways can you implore them to just back up their claims that Kermit and the Freebirds have it all wrong? They can't...so they ramble on about circular BS.....
Anyway...
Good night texasmom, Keepthefaith, Anna and 7 Guests are viewing this topic.
billb.. ::MonkeyCool::

billb -- you say that so well. I have tried to follow your example and NOT log on -- but I can't stand by and and watch people lie -- especially when I know the facts.

Those were kyle's words.

Or a kyle impersonator I guess would be a possibilty.

Or possibly he has a multiple personality disorder -- and that was really his evil twin brother Lyle.  ::MonkeyCool::

And YES -- I guess it is 'remotely' possible that EVERYTHING Kyle told the Freebirds was lies.


BUT -- if in fact was all lies by kyle  (which I will go on record and say I do not believe they were lies) -- then I REALLY don't understand these people defending him  :smt102 And at the same time say they seek justice for Natalee.   ::MonkeyNoNo::


AVOID ARUBA AS IF YOUR LIFE DEPENDS ON IT...IT DOES!!!
Justice for Natalee


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #797 1/30/09 -
Post by: Ree on January 31, 2009, 09:04:35 AM
Found this here:
http://www.hollowaycase.com/archive/civil_court_docs/arubancounselfile.htm

Name/Title/Description: Liquid Substance Testing
Date: 7 October 2005
Pages: 2
File #: 163a-bb-1426-Leads
Location: Bridgetown, Barbados
Writer/Initiator: Douglas. S Shipley

Anybody remember what this was about?


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #797 1/30/09 -
Post by: San on January 31, 2009, 09:35:30 AM
Found this here:
http://www.hollowaycase.com/archive/civil_court_docs/arubancounselfile.htm

Name/Title/Description: Liquid Substance Testing
Date: 7 October 2005
Pages: 2
File #: 163a-bb-1426-Leads
Location: Bridgetown, Barbados
Writer/Initiator: Douglas. S Shipley

Anybody remember what this was about?

I really don't remember but I wonder if it could have been something that was found in Deepak's car.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #797 1/30/09 -
Post by: San on January 31, 2009, 09:43:16 AM
This is for Sleuth & Tibro.  It is a picture from one of the commercials that will be featured on the Superbowl.

(http://i34.photobucket.com/albums/d118/Sanddrops/Sleuth.jpg)


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #797 1/30/09 -
Post by: Buckeye on January 31, 2009, 09:49:45 AM
Found this here:
http://www.hollowaycase.com/archive/civil_court_docs/arubancounselfile.htm

Name/Title/Description: Liquid Substance Testing
Date: 7 October 2005
Pages: 2
File #: 163a-bb-1426-Leads
Location: Bridgetown, Barbados
Writer/Initiator: Douglas. S Shipley

Anybody remember what this was about?

No, but I wonder if they recorded the date wrong. 10/7/05 may actually be July???


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #797 1/30/09 -
Post by: San on January 31, 2009, 09:54:44 AM
Found this here:
http://www.hollowaycase.com/archive/civil_court_docs/arubancounselfile.htm

Name/Title/Description: Liquid Substance Testing
Date: 7 October 2005
Pages: 2
File #: 163a-bb-1426-Leads
Location: Bridgetown, Barbados
Writer/Initiator: Douglas. S Shipley

Anybody remember what this was about?

No, but I wonder if they recorded the date wrong. 10/7/05 may actually be July???

There are quite a few documents that are dated October.  I don't think it is from July.

There is also this one:

Name/Title: DNA investigation
Date: 10 October 2005
Pages: 10
Writer/Initiator. T.D. Croes Fernandes Pedra


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #797 1/30/09 -
Post by: klaasend on January 31, 2009, 10:23:48 AM
Found this here:
http://www.hollowaycase.com/archive/civil_court_docs/arubancounselfile.htm

Name/Title/Description: Liquid Substance Testing
Date: 7 October 2005
Pages: 2
File #: 163a-bb-1426-Leads
Location: Bridgetown, Barbados
Writer/Initiator: Douglas. S Shipley

Anybody remember what this was about?

No, but I wonder if they recorded the date wrong. 10/7/05 may actually be July???

When did Carlos the frozen condom witness show up?


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #797 1/30/09 -
Post by: ldstlou on January 31, 2009, 10:33:12 AM
ARUBA COVER-UP

(http://i18.photobucket.com/albums/b104/Blondeonahd/persistence/PersistenceHansMosandRichardson.jpg)



Idstlou said: ”The footage WAS turned over to the FBI immediately.”http://scaredmonkeys.net/index.php?topic=4340.500
 Idstlou said: ”Sceen shots were sent daily as intructed by the FBI agents in charge, and the footage was turned over at the first opportunity.” http://scaredmonkeys.net/index.php?topic=4340.540
Idstlou said: “They were working with two FBI agents from Barbados. The footage was turned over to them.”http://scaredmonkeys.net/index.php?topic=4340.560

Idstlou said: “I know that there were members of Quantico on board. http://scaredmonkeys.net/index.php?topic=4340.580

"Klye:  I did not give the information to the FBI and I'm unaware of anyone relaying the possibility to them.
pg 39http://scaredmonkeys.net/index.php?topic=4340.760

Quote from: ldstlou on January 02, 2009, 05:46:43 PM
I stated that posters have said part of your credibility stems from taking down a president and working beside two others. I simply asked them to elaborate. You don't have to tell me a thing if you don't want to.

Why do you want personal information on Kermit?
http://scaredmonkeys.net/index.php?topic=4340.420




POOP SUIT ALERT



LEAK said: "This comment was made by Jug during a recent phone conversation:
All of the stuff that Kermit posted
<snip>
FBI did not know about it..."


Kyle was contacted by the FBI AFTER Freebirds sent the evidence/information to them.http://scaredmonkeys.net/index.php?topic=4340.420



CAPS HAS 4 COMPUTERS:
My brain cell + 4 Computers are thinking in all possible scenarios,
http://scaredmonkeys.net/index.php?topic=2539.120

CAPS POSTED:
Got an email today from DH, why took so long?
http://scaredmonkeys.net/index.php?topic=2539.160


I would like to know why on February 7, Caps is talking about this witness on scared monkeys,
this is the witness that would only talk to John through his lawyer, fear of reprisal, but yet Caps feels it's okay to tell the world about him on February 7!








Really Kermit? Really? as my brother would say!
You are going to keep this charade up?

Because I have seen what I believe to be irrefutable evidence that you posted pics of a family member of yours here at SM and insinuated that those pics were of yourself...correct me please if I am wrong on this please.

If this is true, did your the family member know you were doing this and approve?

If I am wrong, I apologize, because then indeed I have been mislead by those trying to discredit you.
But if I am not wrong, then your integrity has been compromised.
If I am not wrong, then you did the misleading.
If I am not wrong, and you are capable of posting pics of a family family on a public forum and insinuating they are pics of yourself, then you are capable of taking Kyle's words out of context and creating a conspiracy theory involving the crew members of the Persistence, people who devoted a lot of their own time, energy and money to search for Natalee at the request of Tim Miler and Dave Holloway.
If I am not wrong, then I believe you are also capable of falsely accusing people of assisting the ALE by sending them info from the pro-Natalee boards with no proof other than "your word".

All of this is just my humble opinion of course.

I do hope that I am wrong.

I am off to the Travel Show.
No Justice for Natalee, No Tourists for Aruba!


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #797 1/30/09 -
Post by: Blonde on January 31, 2009, 10:48:33 AM
oceanexploration
Scared Monkey

 Offline

Posts: 211
           Re: Natalee Case Discussion #776 11/19-08
« Reply #623 on: Today at 04:00:07 PM »   Quote Modify Remove Split Topic

Quote from: SS on November 19, 2008, 08:37:02 PM
John Silvetti - red shirt
Dolf Richardson
Hans Mos

Who are the others?

BTW, this is certainly NOT John Silvetti.  I do not know this man.  He was with the Arubans who came on board for the Dec-30th meeting.

http://scaredmonkeys.net/index.php?topic=4153.620

________________________________________________
Kermit / Hope
I have been posting with since June 2005 she made a detailed document and sent it all to Dave Holloway who turned all her work over to DOMPIG
I later learned that it was turned over to DOMPIG. I thought it was Dave who turned it to Dompig. My gosh, it had so much information in that it isn't funny.
We were all shocked.
Also she posted as Hope but when NH.Net went down we all went to SM and BFN I saw someone in chat using the nic Hope I thought is was her but this Hope told me she was a family member and it was NOT the Hope that I knew .
That is when she went to Kermit.



Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #797 1/30/09 -
Post by: Blonde on January 31, 2009, 10:49:08 AM
Now off  to see my Mom.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #797 1/30/09 -
Post by: Tamikosmom on January 31, 2009, 11:30:14 AM
Found this here:
http://www.hollowaycase.com/archive/civil_court_docs/arubancounselfile.htm

Name/Title/Description: Liquid Substance Testing
Date: 7 October 2005
Pages: 2
File #: 163a-bb-1426-Leads
Location: Bridgetown, Barbados
Writer/Initiator: Douglas. S Shipley

Anybody remember what this was about?

No, but I wonder if they recorded the date wrong. 10/7/05 may actually be July???

When did Carlos the frozen condom witness show up?

May, 2006???

Janet

++++++

CARLOS - THE COLUMBIAN

'Rita Cosby Live & Direct' for June 27
updated 9:31 a.m. PT, Wed., June. 28, 2006


(BEGIN VIDEO CLIP)

BETH HOLLOWAY TWITTY, MOTHER OF NATALEE HOLLOWAY: We still haven‘t heard a final answer on whether this Colombian witness is really credible or not. We still haven‘t heard from the judge. So, it‘s difficult. But there‘s still some things to come.
(END VIDEO CLIP)

COSBY: And tonight, a secret in the Natalee Holloway case has been exposed. There has been a new arrest, one that‘s very much been kept under wraps. Aruban police have nabbed a Colombian national to find out what he may have seen the night the Alabama teen vanished. And if you can believe it, he‘s been behind bars since last month.

So, just who is this person and how did it all go down? On the phone with us right now from Aruba is Julia Renfro with the “Aruba Today” newspaper. Julia, who is this guy?

JULIA RENFRO, ARUBA TODAY (on phone): Hi, Rita. Well, the only thing we know at this point is his name is Carlos and he‘s from Columbia and he has pertinent information claiming to have witnessed a possible murder. He‘s not very specific in that it was Natalee, but it was the night that Natalee disappeared. He claims to have heard screaming, he claims to have heard somebody being dragged out in the ocean and being held under water.

COSBY: And where exactly does he say that he heard the screaming and saw someone being dragged? And did he describe somebody blond like Natalee? And someone looking like Joran or the Kalpoe brothers?

RENFRO: He claims to have seen a small young lady with a talk young man. He was not able to clarify whether or not the type of vehicle. You have to imagine up by the lighthouse, it‘s extremely dark. And apparently, he had a fight or some kind of controversy with his wife and had driven up there to just relax and watch the ocean and watch the waves. And he was woken up by screaming, as he says. And he started peeking around the rocks and that‘s when he claims he saw.

COSBY: And why did police decide to arrest him now a year later? How did word get out of what this guy is claiming?

RENFRO: Well, he came forward several months ago actually, already. Excuse me. He spoke to members of the media, who brought him to the authorities, basically pushing him to the direction that it‘s his responsibility to tell what he saw.

COSBY: And Julia, are authorities taking him seriously? Credible? Or are they saying, wait a minute, this seems a little too wacky to believe.

RENFRO: Well, you have to understand that the authorities are not speaking with anybody at this point. The prosecutor‘s office is not speaking to the press or anybody else. And they are basically just making a strong dedication and commitment to the case to solve it.

COSBY: How long can they hold this guy?

RENFRO: And they‘re not interested in you, they‘re not interested in me.

COSBY: How long can they hold him, Julia? What‘s the law, how long can they keep him?

RENFRO: Well that‘s up to the judge. And it works out to be 180 days. I doubt that will happen. What they‘re doing at this point, they are searching and they‘re investigating the points and details that this man has brought forward. And if any of the details that he‘s brought forward are brought forward to be credible, of course, he will be continued to be detained. And it‘s not because he‘s a suspect. It‘s because unfortunately, he‘s an illegal alien. He‘s living on the island of Aruba without permission. And just like in the United States, which you guys very well know, you can‘t just go and live on somebody else‘s country.

http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/13595183/


Art Wood
DANA PRETZER
July 3, 2006


Art: First of all Carlos is a columbian, he's a male about 40, maybe 40 to 45 years old and at one time he had a work permit to work in Aruba but that expired and he didn't get it extended. At the time this happened he was an illegal. Basically, Carlos contacted Jossy through an intermediary and he was trying to claim the reward. Jossy told Dave and Beth about Carlos and contacted me and basically after consulting with Dave and Beth it was decided that I would talk to Carlos and see if there was any validity I flew down there in April and interviewed Carlos and actually on two occasions. Basically I didn't believe his story at all, I told Jossy there were too many holes in his story. I thought it was 1005 bogus, he was just trying to claim the reward.

Before leaving Aruba, I told Carlos that I would turn the info over the ALE, which I did, I made sure that Karin got that information and let them determine if there was validity to is. I advised Dave and Beth I found it not true, I left Aruba and the authorities picked him up and believed his story for awhile, they held him in protective custody for 6 weeks and now he's recanted his story.

Dana: We as LE or members of the media or people who talk to people for a living. YOu can see contradictions, physical actions, body language, different things that you can soon tell when you interview a witness whether they're a glory grabber or they actually have something

Art;  LE officers involved in criminal investigations develop not just an instinct, they develop a whole personna to tell if someobdy is lying or not. It comes with experiences but it comes with 100's of interrogations you're involved with. This guy's story didn't make any sense to me at all. I was using an interpreter but I could tell he was lying, I knew that he was. As a police officer instinctively you just know when they're lying.

I've told Dave, I'm 100% sure he was lying and turns out he was.


'Rita Cosby Live & Direct' for May 23
updated 9:45 a.m. PT, Wed., May. 24, 2006


DAVE HOLLOWAY, FATHER OF NATALEE HOLLOWAY: ... There is a—a witness out there that—that had contacted us that indicated that he saw something, and had some forensic evidence. And I don‘t know whether they‘re working on that or—or what the deal is. Someone said that he was arrested and is currently being detained.
 
LAKE: Is that witness‘ name Carlos (ph)?

HOLLOWAY: The individual that we were aware of, yes, was named Carlos (ph).

LAKE: OK. And have you heard anything further on that? Are they digging into that?
 
HOLLOWAY: Last week, this individual came forward and indicated he had this—he witnessed something and he had some forensic evidence. And we asked him to go directly to the prosecutor and provide that information. 
LAKE: OK. So, Dave, are you feeling optimistic that there will be more arrests, arrests that can stick, that can turn into a case? How are you feeling now?

HOLLOWAY: You know, I don‘t know, Lauren. It‘s—you hear about
this arrest. You get your hopes up high. And then all of a sudden, you hear that he‘s being released And you just hope and pray in the back of your mind that maybe this guy gave them enough information that more arrests are imminent. You know, you just don‘t know. And you just get your hopes up high, and then they‘re just dashed again.

http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/12954091/


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #797 1/30/09 -
Post by: Tamikosmom on January 31, 2009, 11:31:23 AM
Now off  to see my Mom.

Please keep us updated Blonde.

Hugs

Janet


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #797 1/30/09 -
Post by: klaasend on January 31, 2009, 11:32:36 AM
Thanks Janet - that rules out frozen condom testing in Oct 2005  ::MonkeyHaHa::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #797 1/30/09 -
Post by: Ree on January 31, 2009, 11:33:28 AM
ARUBA COVER-UP

(http://i18.photobucket.com/albums/b104/Blondeonahd/persistence/PersistenceHansMosandRichardson.jpg)



Idstlou said: ”The footage WAS turned over to the FBI immediately.”http://scaredmonkeys.net/index.php?topic=4340.500
 Idstlou said: ”Sceen shots were sent daily as intructed by the FBI agents in charge, and the footage was turned over at the first opportunity.” http://scaredmonkeys.net/index.php?topic=4340.540
Idstlou said: “They were working with two FBI agents from Barbados. The footage was turned over to them.”http://scaredmonkeys.net/index.php?topic=4340.560

Idstlou said: “I know that there were members of Quantico on board. http://scaredmonkeys.net/index.php?topic=4340.580

"Klye:  I did not give the information to the FBI and I'm unaware of anyone relaying the possibility to them.
pg 39http://scaredmonkeys.net/index.php?topic=4340.760

Quote from: ldstlou on January 02, 2009, 05:46:43 PM
I stated that posters have said part of your credibility stems from taking down a president and working beside two others. I simply asked them to elaborate. You don't have to tell me a thing if you don't want to.

Why do you want personal information on Kermit?
http://scaredmonkeys.net/index.php?topic=4340.420




POOP SUIT ALERT



LEAK said: "This comment was made by Jug during a recent phone conversation:
All of the stuff that Kermit posted
<snip>
FBI did not know about it..."


Kyle was contacted by the FBI AFTER Freebirds sent the evidence/information to them.http://scaredmonkeys.net/index.php?topic=4340.420



CAPS HAS 4 COMPUTERS:
My brain cell + 4 Computers are thinking in all possible scenarios,
http://scaredmonkeys.net/index.php?topic=2539.120

CAPS POSTED:
Got an email today from DH, why took so long?
http://scaredmonkeys.net/index.php?topic=2539.160


I would like to know why on February 7, Caps is talking about this witness on scared monkeys,
this is the witness that would only talk to John through his lawyer, fear of reprisal, but yet Caps feels it's okay to tell the world about him on February 7!








Really Kermit? Really? as my brother would say!
You are going to keep this charade up?

Because I have seen what I believe to be irrefutable evidence that you posted pics of a family member of yours here at SM and insinuated that those pics were of yourself...correct me please if I am wrong on this please.

If this is true, did your the family member know you were doing this and approve?

If I am wrong, I apologize, because then indeed I have been mislead by those trying to discredit you.
But if I am not wrong, then your integrity has been compromised.
If I am not wrong, then you did the misleading.
If I am not wrong, and you are capable of posting pics of a family family on a public forum and insinuating they are pics of yourself, then you are capable of taking Kyle's words out of context and creating a conspiracy theory involving the crew members of the Persistence, people who devoted a lot of their own time, energy and money to search for Natalee at the request of Tim Miler and Dave Holloway.
If I am not wrong, then I believe you are also capable of falsely accusing people of assisting the ALE by sending them info from the pro-Natalee boards with no proof other than "your word".

All of this is just my humble opinion of course.

I do hope that I am wrong.

I am off to the Travel Show.
No Justice for Natalee, No Tourists for Aruba!

LDSLOU,

You've made it abundantly clear that you believe Kermit is a fraud.  I respect your right to that opinion.  Now could you sjow the same respect for those of us to believe her to actually discuss the case by scrolling past what you don't believe and stop disruption all discussions other than how you feel about Kermit?


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #797 1/30/09 -
Post by: Tamikosmom on January 31, 2009, 11:34:22 AM
DISCREPANCIES

From here to Aruba
BY JEFF MOORE, THE DAILY IBERIAN
Published/Last Modified on Thursday, November 29, 2007 12:37 PM CST


John Silvetti said his company became involved in the search after he was contacted by Louis Schaefer, chairman of Superior Offshore International. Schaefer had been approached by Texas Equusearch, a non-profit organization that has been searching for Holloway for more than two years

http://www.iberianet.com/articles/2007/11/29/news/news/news00.txt


TIM MILLER - IN HIS OWN WORDS

Natalee Holloway: Tim Miller of Texas EquuSearch Discusses Crab Trap, Clothing and DNA Found in Waters of Aruba
February 27, 2005 2008


I've been trying to put this together for 2 1/2 years.  Louis Schaefer came forward with John Silvetti. (3:40)

Video:
http://scaredmonkeys.com/2008/02/27/natalee-holloway-tim-miller-of-texas-equusearch-discusses-crab-trap-clothing-and-dna-found-in-waters-of-aruba/

++++++++

From here to Aruba
BY JEFF MOORE, THE DAILY IBERIAN
Published/Last Modified on Thursday, November 29, 2007 12:37 PM CST


Silvetti agreed to provide his equipment and primary survey vessel at well below cost, with Schaefer covering all out-of-pocket expenses. Silvetti said his staff volunteered its services for the project as well.

“They said ‘You don’t even have to pay me. I just want to help,’” Silvetti said. “That just tells me we’ve got the right people on board.”

http://www.iberianet.com/articles/2007/11/29/news/news/news00.txt


KYLE KINGMAN - IN HIS OWN WORDS

Kyle
:  I did not feel the same and we had a major difference in opinion. He [John Silvetti] was the one who never pressed ALE to be completely open with us with the trap evidence. I would have forced them to. However, John was the one paying my invoices so I was forced to sit back and hope for the best.


BUMP


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #797 1/30/09 -
Post by: Tamikosmom on January 31, 2009, 11:35:06 AM
Thanks Janet - that rules out frozen condom testing in Oct 2005  ::MonkeyHaHa::

 ::MonkeyHaHa::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #797 1/30/09 -
Post by: Tamikosmom on January 31, 2009, 11:43:37 AM
GOOD MORNING MONKEYS!!  GOOD MORNING ZOOKEEPERS!!

One more sleep and ... Daughter, SIL and four grandkids (5-10) return from a two week holiday to see Mickey and Minnie in Orlando, Floriday.

 ::cartwheel::

I have missed them soooo much ... especially the kids.  Their beautiful voices on the phone does not suffice.

Have a good day all!

Janet
8:45 AM PT


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #797 1/30/09 -
Post by: texasmom on January 31, 2009, 11:48:08 AM
GOOD MORNING MONKEYS!!  GOOD MORNING ZOOKEEPERS!!

One more sleep and ... Daughter, SIL and four grandkids (5-10) return from a two week holiday to see Mickey and Minnie in Orlando, Floriday.

 ::cartwheel::

I have missed them soooo much ... especially the kids.  Their beautiful voices on the phone does not suffice.

Have a good day all!

Janet
8:45 AM PT

Good morning Janet! 

I hope you have a great day! 

 ::MonkeyCool::




Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #797 1/30/09 -
Post by: klaasend on January 31, 2009, 11:58:55 AM
O/T posted in the Caylee thread:  ::MonkeyHaHa::

http://www.youtube.com/v/MO1SvN9ygh4&hl=en&fs=1


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #797 1/30/09 -
Post by: bastibro on January 31, 2009, 12:03:55 PM
ARUBA COVER-UP

(http://i18.photobucket.com/albums/b104/Blondeonahd/persistence/PersistenceHansMosandRichardson.jpg)



Idstlou said: ”The footage WAS turned over to the FBI immediately.”http://scaredmonkeys.net/index.php?topic=4340.500
 Idstlou said: ”Sceen shots were sent daily as intructed by the FBI agents in charge, and the footage was turned over at the first opportunity.” http://scaredmonkeys.net/index.php?topic=4340.540
Idstlou said: “They were working with two FBI agents from Barbados. The footage was turned over to them.”http://scaredmonkeys.net/index.php?topic=4340.560

Idstlou said: “I know that there were members of Quantico on board. http://scaredmonkeys.net/index.php?topic=4340.580

"Klye:  I did not give the information to the FBI and I'm unaware of anyone relaying the possibility to them.
pg 39http://scaredmonkeys.net/index.php?topic=4340.760

Quote from: ldstlou on January 02, 2009, 05:46:43 PM
I stated that posters have said part of your credibility stems from taking down a president and working beside two others. I simply asked them to elaborate. You don't have to tell me a thing if you don't want to.

Why do you want personal information on Kermit?
http://scaredmonkeys.net/index.php?topic=4340.420




POOP SUIT ALERT



LEAK said: "This comment was made by Jug during a recent phone conversation:
All of the stuff that Kermit posted
<snip>
FBI did not know about it..."


Kyle was contacted by the FBI AFTER Freebirds sent the evidence/information to them.http://scaredmonkeys.net/index.php?topic=4340.420



CAPS HAS 4 COMPUTERS:
My brain cell + 4 Computers are thinking in all possible scenarios,
http://scaredmonkeys.net/index.php?topic=2539.120

CAPS POSTED:
Got an email today from DH, why took so long?
http://scaredmonkeys.net/index.php?topic=2539.160


I would like to know why on February 7, Caps is talking about this witness on scared monkeys,
this is the witness that would only talk to John through his lawyer, fear of reprisal, but yet Caps feels it's okay to tell the world about him on February 7!








Really Kermit? Really? as my brother would say!
You are going to keep this charade up?

Because I have seen what I believe to be irrefutable evidence that you posted pics of a family member of yours here at SM and insinuated that those pics were of yourself...correct me please if I am wrong on this please.

If this is true, did your the family member know you were doing this and approve?

If I am wrong, I apologize, because then indeed I have been mislead by those trying to discredit you.
But if I am not wrong, then your integrity has been compromised.
If I am not wrong, then you did the misleading.
If I am not wrong, and you are capable of posting pics of a family family on a public forum and insinuating they are pics of yourself, then you are capable of taking Kyle's words out of context and creating a conspiracy theory involving the crew members of the Persistence, people who devoted a lot of their own time, energy and money to search for Natalee at the request of Tim Miler and Dave Holloway.
If I am not wrong, then I believe you are also capable of falsely accusing people of assisting the ALE by sending them info from the pro-Natalee boards with no proof other than "your word".

All of this is just my humble opinion of course.

I do hope that I am wrong.

I am off to the Travel Show.
No Justice for Natalee, No Tourists for Aruba!

LDSLOU,

You've made it abundantly clear that you believe Kermit is a fraud.  I respect your right to that opinion.  Now could you sjow the same respect for those of us to believe her to actually discuss the case by scrolling past what you don't believe and stop disruption all discussions other than how you feel about Kermit?

Not that it matters and only for the record: I always believed that the frog was a fraud to.
To me the latest developments confirm my suspicions. JMHO ::MonkeyNoNo::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #797 1/30/09 -
Post by: texasmom on January 31, 2009, 12:08:20 PM
Ree,

Great suggestion for ldstlou, but don't count on her following it.

Several monkeys have pointed out to her that Kermit is not alone in verifying the information that has been presented.  She continues to attempt to discredit Kermit in an attempt to make the information invalid.  Since that obviously isn't working, she adds a silly picture to her post as a further attack on Kermit.  She does not even mention the others who have verified the information that Kermit has presented.

The agenda is obvious; personal attack on Kermit.  ::MonkeyNoNo::

http://scaredmonkeys.net/index.php?topic=4340.420

Kermit's response to ldstlou:

Quote
Re: Natalee Case Discussion #789 1/1/09 -
« Reply #427 on: January 02, 2009, 05:53:16 PM »

And as I stated before. I am not going to give you my resume'.
And I'm not asking for yours either.

I am here and have been here since the beginning for Justice in the Natalee Holloway case.
Believe what I have posted or do not - of course it's yours and anyone else's choice. I ain't forcing no one to do anything or beelive anything.
BUT I am just telling you as well as 5 other Freebirds, we have no reason to lie to you. Nor have we.
Bringing Natalee home is the goal. Nothing else.




Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #797 1/30/09 -
Post by: Keepthefaith on January 31, 2009, 12:11:57 PM
ARUBA COVER-UP

(http://i18.photobucket.com/albums/b104/Blondeonahd/persistence/PersistenceHansMosandRichardson.jpg)



Idstlou said: ”The footage WAS turned over to the FBI immediately.”http://scaredmonkeys.net/index.php?topic=4340.500
 Idstlou said: ”Sceen shots were sent daily as intructed by the FBI agents in charge, and the footage was turned over at the first opportunity.” http://scaredmonkeys.net/index.php?topic=4340.540
Idstlou said: “They were working with two FBI agents from Barbados. The footage was turned over to them.”http://scaredmonkeys.net/index.php?topic=4340.560

Idstlou said: “I know that there were members of Quantico on board. http://scaredmonkeys.net/index.php?topic=4340.580

"Klye:  I did not give the information to the FBI and I'm unaware of anyone relaying the possibility to them.
pg 39http://scaredmonkeys.net/index.php?topic=4340.760

Quote from: ldstlou on January 02, 2009, 05:46:43 PM
I stated that posters have said part of your credibility stems from taking down a president and working beside two others. I simply asked them to elaborate. You don't have to tell me a thing if you don't want to.

Why do you want personal information on Kermit?
http://scaredmonkeys.net/index.php?topic=4340.420




POOP SUIT ALERT



LEAK said: "This comment was made by Jug during a recent phone conversation:
All of the stuff that Kermit posted
<snip>
FBI did not know about it..."


Kyle was contacted by the FBI AFTER Freebirds sent the evidence/information to them.http://scaredmonkeys.net/index.php?topic=4340.420



CAPS HAS 4 COMPUTERS:
My brain cell + 4 Computers are thinking in all possible scenarios,
http://scaredmonkeys.net/index.php?topic=2539.120

CAPS POSTED:
Got an email today from DH, why took so long?
http://scaredmonkeys.net/index.php?topic=2539.160


I would like to know why on February 7, Caps is talking about this witness on scared monkeys,
this is the witness that would only talk to John through his lawyer, fear of reprisal, but yet Caps feels it's okay to tell the world about him on February 7!








Really Kermit? Really? as my brother would say!
You are going to keep this charade up?

Because I have seen what I believe to be irrefutable evidence that you posted pics of a family member of yours here at SM and insinuated that those pics were of yourself...correct me please if I am wrong on this please.

If this is true, did your the family member know you were doing this and approve?

If I am wrong, I apologize, because then indeed I have been mislead by those trying to discredit you.
But if I am not wrong, then your integrity has been compromised.
If I am not wrong, then you did the misleading.
If I am not wrong, and you are capable of posting pics of a family family on a public forum and insinuating they are pics of yourself, then you are capable of taking Kyle's words out of context and creating a conspiracy theory involving the crew members of the Persistence, people who devoted a lot of their own time, energy and money to search for Natalee at the request of Tim Miler and Dave Holloway.
If I am not wrong, then I believe you are also capable of falsely accusing people of assisting the ALE by sending them info from the pro-Natalee boards with no proof other than "your word".

All of this is just my humble opinion of course.

I do hope that I am wrong.

I am off to the Travel Show.
No Justice for Natalee, No Tourists for Aruba!

LDSLOU,

You've made it abundantly clear that you believe Kermit is a fraud.  I respect your right to that opinion.  Now could you sjow the same respect for those of us to believe her to actually discuss the case by scrolling past what you don't believe and stop disruption all discussions other than how you feel about Kermit?

Not that it matters and only for the record: I always believed that the frog was a fraud to.
To me the latest developments confirm my suspicions. JMHO ::MonkeyNoNo::


Re: Natalee Case Discussion #776 11/19-08
« Reply #679 on: November 20, 2008, 06:10:15 PM » 

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
"I haven't seen Kermit post anything untrue presented as factual.  He's expressed his opinion, been taken out of context and misunderstood a few times, but he's pretty spot on as far as facts are concerned."


This is a quote from KYLE(OE)


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #797 1/30/09 -
Post by: Keepthefaith on January 31, 2009, 12:16:26 PM
Bastibro

"Not that it matters and only for the record: I always believed that the frog was a fraud to.
To me the latest developments confirm my suspicions. JMHO"



KEEPTHEFAITH

Kermit is very good,as well as methodical!I stand with the Frog!


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #797 1/30/09 -
Post by: Keepthefaith on January 31, 2009, 12:18:40 PM
Copy,paste,Copy,paste,Copy,paste....

Off to the Hidey-hole.HEY!Off to the Hidey-hole.HEY!

Who's got the grunt work today for CnG?Raise your hand! ::MonkeyCool::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #797 1/30/09 -
Post by: wreck on January 31, 2009, 12:23:49 PM
Earth to Kermit haters:

Once again, Kermit is NOT the instigator here -- only the MESSENGER. Kyle relayed EVERYTHING Kermit is REPORTING to ALL of the Freebirds. Kermit is the one who was brave enough to bring the WORDS OF KYLE to light. The other Freebirds have ALL confirmed what Kermit has brought over.
Dismiss Kermit (and her motives) all you want -- it doesn't change one thing! To dismiss Kermit -- you must dismiss ALL the Freeebirds. Is that what you are telling us?????


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #797 1/30/09 -
Post by: Tamikosmom on January 31, 2009, 12:29:43 PM

Not that it matters and only for the record: I always believed that the frog was a fraud to.
To me the latest developments confirm my suspicions. JMHO ::MonkeyNoNo::


KYLE KINGMAN - IN HIS OWN WORDS

oceanexploration
Re: Natalee Case Discussion #776 11/19-08
« Reply #679 on: November 20, 2008, 10:10:15 PM »


I haven't seen Kermit post anything untrue presented as factual.  He's expressed his opinion, been taken out of context and misunderstood a few times, but he's pretty spot on as far as facts are concerned.

http://scaredmonkeys.net/index.php?topic=4153.msg551217;topicseen#msg551217


JEN - THE NATALEE FREEBIRDS

klassend
Re: Natalee Case Discussion #787 12/24/08 -
« Reply #411 on: December 30, 2008, 06:53:44 PM »

Sent to me by Natalee's Freebirds
:

Please feel free (if you'd like) to post this at your board.
 
During the journey of the Persistence to Aruba, Kyle reached out and emailed with us.  During that time, one of the questions posed to him was regarding protocol if/when Natalee's remains were found.
 
Kyle's response was that he was unsure, but felt that would be settled before the search began.
 
The cautions were given to him about the lack of integrity on the part of Aruba's law enforcement, prosecutor's office, and its judiciary.
 
Contact with Kyle continued throughout the duration of the search by the Persistence.
 
Once back home, Kyle asked us for our help.  He was very concerned about the activities that transpired during their search - specifically surrounding the find of the fishing cage and its contents.  Kyle wanted our help in presenting this information in a factual way, to then be given to Natalee's family. 
 
This was March 18, 2008.  At that time, Kyle assured us he had just recently sent the images from the Dec 30th and Jan 7th dives to the FBI, but had never received a response from them.
 
We later found that to be false.
 
Also at that time, Beth's brother saw the images Kyle had shared with us - but none of the detail he shared later.

We compiled the images Kyle presented us, along with his opinions and the facts surrounding the sequence of events regarding that fishing cage.  Kyle stated he would be getting in touch with Beth Holloway.
 
We later found out that never happened.

At this time, Kyle shared with us the broadcast networks he had approached in February, in an attempt to sell these images to the highest bidder.
 
This didn't concern us greatly at that time - as we were under the impression US law enforcement and Natalee's family had already been made aware of their find.
 
Approximately May 2008 Kyle began dodging questions for details (we had asked for names of Aruban police and divers to be included in our documentation of these events), hedging on moving forward with this, and then he completely disappeared from our board.
 
During that time, we learned Kyle had never contacted Beth, or Dave, or the FBI with this information.
 
We put our original plan into motion - that of presenting this information in a clear and concise manner, and we sent it to Beth Holloway.
 
Beth was disturbed, needed time to digest the information, and wanted to share it with someone she trusts.
 
When Tim Miller was returning to Aruba this past fall, Beth gave us permission to release this information publicly.
 
At that point, we gave it to John Kelly, Carmen Adams with the FBI, and got it ready for public consumption.
 
The next step was to publish this information at our blog.
 
One of our members felt we were betraying Kyle in doing so, contacted him, and he re-surfaced at our site with threats of litigation against us - stating this was his "intellectual property" and we could not use it.
 
That of course concerned us greatly - as none of us could afford to be sued.
 
He also stated at that time, Luis Shaefer had just recently sold the rights of the video of these images to a broadcast company for the purposes of a documentary.
 
We contacted legal counsel and were advised to keep our distance from any Persistence crew member, in the face of potential obstruction/accessory charges.
 
At this point, one of our members decided to brace for the possibility of civil litigation, resigned from our membership to protect it from same, and posted what he knows to be factual at SM.
 
Kyle did tell us human remains were found in that fish cage.
 
Kyle did tell us about John Silvetti's intent to open an office on the island of Aruba, to enable him ease in conducting business in South America, and Aruba.
 
Kyle also told us of John's absolute refusal to give that fish cage and its contents any credence - before even it was inspected on Jan 7th.
 
Kyle told us in no uncertain terms that Tim Miller and Dateline were abruptly removed from the Persistence on Dec 30, resulting in only Persistence crew being aboard between that date and the Jan 7 dive of the Arubans.
 
Nothing that was posted at SM by kermit was incorrect, out of context, or in any way false.
 
Regards,
 
Former Natalee's Freebirds Administrator

Natalee and her family deserve justice - and we will not let up until they have it!

http://scaredmonkeys.net/index.php?topic=4269.msg603349#msg603349




Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #797 1/30/09 -
Post by: Mere on January 31, 2009, 12:29:54 PM
Earth to Kermit haters:

Once again, Kermit is NOT the instigator here -- only the MESSENGER. Kyle relayed EVERYTHING Kermit is REPORTING to ALL of the Freebirds. Kermit is the one who was brave enough to bring the WORDS OF KYLE to light. The other Freebirds have ALL confirmed what Kermit has brought over.
Dismiss Kermit (and her motives) all you want -- it doesn't change one thing! To dismiss Kermit -- you must dismiss ALL the Freeebirds. Is that what you are telling us?????

wreck....nice, clear and right to the point....thank you..... ::MonkeyDance::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #797 1/30/09 -
Post by: Keepthefaith on January 31, 2009, 12:30:16 PM
Earth to Kermit haters:

Once again, Kermit is NOT the instigator here -- only the MESSENGER. Kyle relayed EVERYTHING Kermit is REPORTING to ALL of the Freebirds. Kermit is the one who was brave enough to bring the WORDS OF KYLE to light. The other Freebirds have ALL confirmed what Kermit has brought over.
Dismiss Kermit (and her motives) all you want -- it doesn't change one thing! To dismiss Kermit -- you must dismiss ALL the Freeebirds. Is that what you are telling us?????

LOGIC DICTATES..............


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #797 1/30/09 -
Post by: wreck on January 31, 2009, 12:30:43 PM
You all have told us WHY you hate Kermit --- tell us WHY you believe Kyle and Caps.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #797 1/30/09 -
Post by: Lifesong on January 31, 2009, 12:35:22 PM
Re: Natalee Case Discussion #796 1/27/09 -on: January 29, 2009, 10:16:37 PM 
http://scaredmonkeys.net/index.php?topic=4448.msg651440;topicseen#msg651440
 
Quote
Message by Tamikosmom
Relevance: 44.7%

Growing Frustration in Aruba
Wednesday, July 06, 2005

GEORGE "JUG" TWITTY: Well, the way the system works down here, when the case is closed, we will have all that information, and we can release it to the world.

http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,161705,00.html


Art Wood
DANA PRETZER
July 2, 2006 - Part 1
July 8, 2006 - Part 2

The family of Natalee needs to put pressure on the US attorney in Birmingham to push the FBI to conduct an investigation after ALE close the case. We have a treaty that allows the FBI to pursue a violation of civil rights of an American citizen there.


'Rita Cosby Live & Direct' for December 1
updated 7:37 a.m. PT, Fri., Dec. 2, 2005

ART WOOD, FORMER SECRET SERVICE AGENT: Absolutely. Absolutely. There's a lot that Americans can do through the State Department. I want to remind everybody that Natalee Holloway was a U.S. citizen. Once the Aruban authorities are done investigating this case, the FBI can still conduct an investigation, and they could extradite these suspects to the United States. Let me point out that there's a ton of circumstantial evidence in this case to convict these kids.

http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/10295536/
 


I've spent this morning at http://www.hollowaycase.com and my heart is so heavy it literally aches.

I'm ready for Aruba to close the case before anymore evidence turns up for them to destroy, discredit or deport.  We have a better chance with our own State Dept., US Attorneys and FBI than we will ever, ever have with Aruba.

I'm also terribly grateful for the Dr. Phil lawsuit.  I hope it continues to drag on as that may be the only catalyst to prevent all the files being destroyed when the case is closed.

Justice will never come from Aruba.  Never.  Never.   ::MonkeyNoNo::

Close the case, Aruba.  Close the case. 





Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #797 1/30/09 -
Post by: Magnolia on January 31, 2009, 12:36:05 PM
I really think the best thing to do is ignore ldstlou.
I know it is hard to ignore the nasty things she says,
But the CnG people have sent her here with an agenda
to disrupt.  She doesn't comprehend what any of us
have to reply.  Maybe she isn't capable of comprehending.
Let her do her drive by and just pretend it isn't happening.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #797 1/30/09 -
Post by: Tamikosmom on January 31, 2009, 12:37:56 PM
O/T posted in the Caylee thread:  ::MonkeyHaHa::

http://www.youtube.com/v/MO1SvN9ygh4&hl=en&fs=1

Thanks Klaas.

I realy enjoyed that clip.  Thanks for sharing.  The tune and lyrics are catchy.  I know will be humming "I LIKE YOU" all day.

Janet


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #797 1/30/09 -
Post by: Keepthefaith on January 31, 2009, 12:45:09 PM
ARUBA COVER-UP

(http://i18.photobucket.com/albums/b104/Blondeonahd/persistence/PersistenceHansMosandRichardson.jpg)



Idstlou said: ”The footage WAS turned over to the FBI immediately.”http://scaredmonkeys.net/index.php?topic=4340.500
 Idstlou said: ”Sceen shots were sent daily as intructed by the FBI agents in charge, and the footage was turned over at the first opportunity.” http://scaredmonkeys.net/index.php?topic=4340.540
Idstlou said: “They were working with two FBI agents from Barbados. The footage was turned over to them.”http://scaredmonkeys.net/index.php?topic=4340.560

Idstlou said: “I know that there were members of Quantico on board. http://scaredmonkeys.net/index.php?topic=4340.580

"Klye:  I did not give the information to the FBI and I'm unaware of anyone relaying the possibility to them.
pg 39http://scaredmonkeys.net/index.php?topic=4340.760

Quote from: ldstlou on January 02, 2009, 05:46:43 PM
I stated that posters have said part of your credibility stems from taking down a president and working beside two others. I simply asked them to elaborate. You don't have to tell me a thing if you don't want to.

Why do you want personal information on Kermit?
http://scaredmonkeys.net/index.php?topic=4340.420




POOP SUIT ALERT



LEAK said: "This comment was made by Jug during a recent phone conversation:
All of the stuff that Kermit posted
<snip>
FBI did not know about it..."


Kyle was contacted by the FBI AFTER Freebirds sent the evidence/information to them.http://scaredmonkeys.net/index.php?topic=4340.420



CAPS HAS 4 COMPUTERS:
My brain cell + 4 Computers are thinking in all possible scenarios,
http://scaredmonkeys.net/index.php?topic=2539.120

CAPS POSTED:
Got an email today from DH, why took so long?
http://scaredmonkeys.net/index.php?topic=2539.160


I would like to know why on February 7, Caps is talking about this witness on scared monkeys,
this is the witness that would only talk to John through his lawyer, fear of reprisal, but yet Caps feels it's okay to tell the world about him on February 7!








 ::MonkeyDance:: ::MonkeyDance:: ::MonkeyDance:: ::MonkeyDance::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #797 1/30/09 -
Post by: Lifesong on January 31, 2009, 12:47:39 PM
I really think the best thing to do is ignore ldstlou.
I know it is hard to ignore the nasty things she says,
But the CnG people have sent her here with an agenda
to disrupt.  She doesn't comprehend what any of us
have to reply.  Maybe she isn't capable of comprehending.
Let her do her drive by and just pretend it isn't happening.


Last night was my final attempt to get past the "attack the messenger" mode of operation.

I really can respect that people have different opinions.

But its time to refute the message or drop it.

I have an imaginary Ignore button and I'm not afraid to use it!  ::MonkeyWink::  ::MonkeyTongue::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #797 1/30/09 -
Post by: Tamikosmom on January 31, 2009, 12:49:24 PM
You all have told us WHY you hate Kermit --- tell us WHY you believe Kyle and Caps.

What is really confusing.  It appears posters at the CnG Natalee Holloway Forum ... uphold Kyle (not his words) and ... uphold John Silvetti.

What would Kermit's motivation be in making up all those posts and ... attributing the words to Kyle Kingman ... if he/she were not attempting to expose the finale to the great Aruban coverup as well as ... an utter betrayal of Natalee Holloway's family ... a betrayal that implies that the opportunity to bring Natalee home to American soil may have been lost forever?

What would the Natalee's Freebirds' motivation be in uphold Kermit?

Janet



Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #797 1/30/09 -
Post by: Keepthefaith on January 31, 2009, 12:51:32 PM
Startin on that first cup of coffee! ::MonkeyDance:: ::MonkeyDance::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #797 1/30/09 -
Post by: Tamikosmom on January 31, 2009, 01:00:37 PM
Startin on that first cup of coffee! ::MonkeyDance:: ::MonkeyDance::

 ::MonkeyWaa::

I have not had a cup of coffee in months.  Last summer ... my longtime neighbour/friend quit smoking for the millionth time in her life.  I made her a deal.  I would give up my addiction to Tim Horton's coffee to support her in what I honestly felt was a futile quest.  Well ... she showed me.   She has not had one of those white sticks since.

Green tea is where it is at for me.  This implies that it takes longer for the fog to clear in my head each morning and ... it also implies I do not get that much antcipated buzz.

Oh well ... life goes on.

 ::MonkeyHaHa::

Janet


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #797 1/30/09 -
Post by: wreck on January 31, 2009, 01:02:30 PM
Startin on that first cup of coffee! ::MonkeyDance:: ::MonkeyDance::

 ::MonkeyWaa::

I have not had a cup of coffee in months.  Last summer ... my longtime neighbour/friend quit smoking for the millionth time in her life.  I made her a deal.  I would give up my addiction to Tim Horton's coffee to support her in what I honestly felt was a futile quest.  Well ... she showed me.   She has not had one of those white sticks since.

Green tea is where it is at for me.  This implies that it takes longer for the fog to clear in my head each morning and ... it also implies I do not get that much antcipated buzz.

Oh well ... life goes on.

 ::MonkeyHaHa::

Janet
Green Tea is a communist plot.  ::MonkeyNoNo::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #797 1/30/09 -
Post by: texasmom on January 31, 2009, 01:03:28 PM
Startin on that first cup of coffee! ::MonkeyDance:: ::MonkeyDance::

 ::MonkeyWaa::

I have not had a cup of coffee in months.  Last summer ... my longtime neighbour/friend quit smoking for the millionth time in her life.  I made her a deal.  I would give up my addiction to Tim Horton's coffee to support her in what I honestly felt was a futile quest.  Well ... she showed me.   She has not had one of those white sticks since.

Green tea is where it is at for me.  This implies that it takes longer for the fog to clear in my head each morning and ... it also implies I do not get that much antcipated buzz.

Oh well ... life goes on.

 ::MonkeyHaHa::

Janet
Green Tea is a communist plot.  ::MonkeyNoNo::

 ::MonkeyHaHa::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #797 1/30/09 -
Post by: Tamikosmom on January 31, 2009, 01:08:29 PM
Startin on that first cup of coffee! ::MonkeyDance:: ::MonkeyDance::

 ::MonkeyWaa::

I have not had a cup of coffee in months.  Last summer ... my longtime neighbour/friend quit smoking for the millionth time in her life.  I made her a deal.  I would give up my addiction to Tim Horton's coffee to support her in what I honestly felt was a futile quest.  Well ... she showed me.   She has not had one of those white sticks since.

Green tea is where it is at for me.  This implies that it takes longer for the fog to clear in my head each morning and ... it also implies I do not get that much antcipated buzz.

Oh well ... life goes on.

 ::MonkeyHaHa::

Janet
Green Tea is a communist plot.  ::MonkeyNoNo::

 ::MonkeyHaHa::



Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #797 1/30/09 -
Post by: Keepthefaith on January 31, 2009, 01:12:17 PM
Startin on that first cup of coffee! ::MonkeyDance:: ::MonkeyDance::

 ::MonkeyWaa::

I have not had a cup of coffee in months.  Last summer ... my longtime neighbour/friend quit smoking for the millionth time in her life.  I made her a deal.  I would give up my addiction to Tim Horton's coffee to support her in what I honestly felt was a futile quest.  Well ... she showed me.   She has not had one of those white sticks since.

Green tea is where it is at for me.  This implies that it takes longer for the fog to clear in my head each morning and ... it also implies I do not get that much antcipated buzz.

Oh well ... life goes on.

 ::MonkeyHaHa::

Janet

No worries Janet.I will have a second cup for you.... ::MonkeyTongue::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #797 1/30/09 -
Post by: always 1 on January 31, 2009, 01:12:53 PM
Startin on that first cup of coffee! ::MonkeyDance:: ::MonkeyDance::

 ::MonkeyWaa::

I have not had a cup of coffee in months.  Last summer ... my longtime neighbour/friend quit smoking for the millionth time in her life.  I made her a deal.  I would give up my addiction to Tim Horton's coffee to support her in what I honestly felt was a futile quest.  Well ... she showed me.   She has not had one of those white sticks since.

Green tea is where it is at for me.  This implies that it takes longer for the fog to clear in my head each morning and ... it also implies I do not get that much antcipated buzz.

Oh well ... life goes on.

 ::MonkeyHaHa::

Janet
Green Tea is a communist plot.  ::MonkeyNoNo::
Will it make me hinky????  Bring that!!!!


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #797 1/30/09 -
Post by: Tamikosmom on January 31, 2009, 01:13:23 PM
Startin on that first cup of coffee! ::MonkeyDance:: ::MonkeyDance::

 ::MonkeyWaa::

I have not had a cup of coffee in months.  Last summer ... my longtime neighbour/friend quit smoking for the millionth time in her life.  I made her a deal.  I would give up my addiction to Tim Horton's coffee to support her in what I honestly felt was a futile quest.  Well ... she showed me.   She has not had one of those white sticks since.

Green tea is where it is at for me.  This implies that it takes longer for the fog to clear in my head each morning and ... it also implies I do not get that much antcipated buzz.

Oh well ... life goes on.

 ::MonkeyHaHa::

Janet
Green Tea is a communist plot.  ::MonkeyNoNo::

 ::MonkeyHaHa::



 ::MonkeyTongue::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #797 1/30/09 -
Post by: Keepthefaith on January 31, 2009, 01:13:33 PM
Startin on that first cup of coffee! ::MonkeyDance:: ::MonkeyDance::

 ::MonkeyWaa::

I have not had a cup of coffee in months.  Last summer ... my longtime neighbour/friend quit smoking for the millionth time in her life.  I made her a deal.  I would give up my addiction to Tim Horton's coffee to support her in what I honestly felt was a futile quest.  Well ... she showed me.   She has not had one of those white sticks since.

Green tea is where it is at for me.  This implies that it takes longer for the fog to clear in my head each morning and ... it also implies I do not get that much antcipated buzz.

Oh well ... life goes on.

 ::MonkeyHaHa::

Janet
Green Tea is a communist plot.  ::MonkeyNoNo::
Will it make me hinky????  Bring that!!!!

 ::MonkeyHaHa::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #797 1/30/09 -
Post by: Tamikosmom on January 31, 2009, 01:14:08 PM
Startin on that first cup of coffee! ::MonkeyDance:: ::MonkeyDance::

 ::MonkeyWaa::

I have not had a cup of coffee in months.  Last summer ... my longtime neighbour/friend quit smoking for the millionth time in her life.  I made her a deal.  I would give up my addiction to Tim Horton's coffee to support her in what I honestly felt was a futile quest.  Well ... she showed me.   She has not had one of those white sticks since.

Green tea is where it is at for me.  This implies that it takes longer for the fog to clear in my head each morning and ... it also implies I do not get that much antcipated buzz.

Oh well ... life goes on.

 ::MonkeyHaHa::

Janet

No worries Janet.I will have a second cup for you.... ::MonkeyTongue::

 ::MonkeyTongue::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #797 1/30/09 -
Post by: San on January 31, 2009, 01:15:06 PM

Really Kermit? Really? as my brother would say!
You are going to keep this charade up?

Because I have seen what I believe to be irrefutable evidence that you posted pics of a family member of yours here at SM and insinuated that those pics were of yourself...correct me please if I am wrong on this please.

If this is true, did your the family member know you were doing this and approve?

If I am wrong, I apologize, because then indeed I have been mislead by those trying to discredit you.
But if I am not wrong, then your integrity has been compromised.
If I am not wrong, then you did the misleading.
If I am not wrong, and you are capable of posting pics of a family family on a public forum and insinuating they are pics of yourself, then you are capable of taking Kyle's words out of context and creating a conspiracy theory involving the crew members of the Persistence, people who devoted a lot of their own time, energy and money to search for Natalee at the request of Tim Miler and Dave Holloway.
If I am not wrong, then I believe you are also capable of falsely accusing people of assisting the ALE by sending them info from the pro-Natalee boards with no proof other than "your word".

All of this is just my humble opinion of course.

I do hope that I am wrong.

I am off to the Travel Show.
No Justice for Natalee, No Tourists for Aruba!


I am not a puppet and no one is e-mailing me.
I am simply asking a question. I know I am not the only one who thought she was Secret Service. What is the big deal? You post pics of yourself at Presidential funerals and events...I would say that is giving the impression she is Secret Service. Dear lawdy..I said apparently other Monkeys know her and trust her and I am trying to figure it all out..I think it is a fair question.

So is Kermit Secret Service as most would assume from the pics or not?

And I am not running away...have a bunch of 8 year olds here and trying to get ready for the protest so forgive me as I come and go!

I am not going into this Kermit thing again but last night you said no one was emailing you.  But the above post you made makes me think differently. 

JMO.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #797 1/30/09 -
Post by: texasmom on January 31, 2009, 01:18:08 PM
Startin on that first cup of coffee! ::MonkeyDance:: ::MonkeyDance::

 ::MonkeyWaa::

I have not had a cup of coffee in months.  Last summer ... my longtime neighbour/friend quit smoking for the millionth time in her life.  I made her a deal.  I would give up my addiction to Tim Horton's coffee to support her in what I honestly felt was a futile quest.  Well ... she showed me.   She has not had one of those white sticks since.

Green tea is where it is at for me.  This implies that it takes longer for the fog to clear in my head each morning and ... it also implies I do not get that much antcipated buzz.

Oh well ... life goes on.

 ::MonkeyHaHa::

Janet

No worries Janet.I will have a second cup for you.... ::MonkeyTongue::

 ::MonkeyTongue::

I'm on my second cup too....unfortunately it is warmed up from yesterday.  ::MonkeyWaa::

Major water leak discovered in the wee hours; no water until it is fixed.  

The plumber is on it now, so I hope to have a fresh pot brewing shortly.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #797 1/30/09 -
Post by: San on January 31, 2009, 01:19:57 PM
You all have told us WHY you hate Kermit --- tell us WHY you believe Kyle and Caps.

Show us the proof.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #797 1/30/09 -
Post by: Tamikosmom on January 31, 2009, 01:20:45 PM
Startin on that first cup of coffee! ::MonkeyDance:: ::MonkeyDance::

 ::MonkeyWaa::

I have not had a cup of coffee in months.  Last summer ... my longtime neighbour/friend quit smoking for the millionth time in her life.  I made her a deal.  I would give up my addiction to Tim Horton's coffee to support her in what I honestly felt was a futile quest.  Well ... she showed me.   She has not had one of those white sticks since.

Green tea is where it is at for me.  This implies that it takes longer for the fog to clear in my head each morning and ... it also implies I do not get that much antcipated buzz.

Oh well ... life goes on.

 ::MonkeyHaHa::

Janet
Green Tea is a communist plot.  ::MonkeyNoNo::
Will it make me hinky????  Bring that!!!!

Green tea will make you hinky all over.

 ::MonkeyHaHa::

Janet


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #797 1/30/09 -
Post by: always 1 on January 31, 2009, 01:22:01 PM
Startin on that first cup of coffee! ::MonkeyDance:: ::MonkeyDance::

 ::MonkeyWaa::

I have not had a cup of coffee in months.  Last summer ... my longtime neighbour/friend quit smoking for the millionth time in her life.  I made her a deal.  I would give up my addiction to Tim Horton's coffee to support her in what I honestly felt was a futile quest.  Well ... she showed me.   She has not had one of those white sticks since.

Green tea is where it is at for me.  This implies that it takes longer for the fog to clear in my head each morning and ... it also implies I do not get that much antcipated buzz.

Oh well ... life goes on.

 ::MonkeyHaHa::

Janet
Green Tea is a communist plot.  ::MonkeyNoNo::
Will it make me hinky????  Bring that!!!!

Green tea will make you hinky all over.

 ::MonkeyHaHa::

Janet
  ::MonkeyShocked::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #797 1/30/09 -
Post by: texasmom on January 31, 2009, 01:22:30 PM
Startin on that first cup of coffee! ::MonkeyDance:: ::MonkeyDance::

 ::MonkeyWaa::

I have not had a cup of coffee in months.  Last summer ... my longtime neighbour/friend quit smoking for the millionth time in her life.  I made her a deal.  I would give up my addiction to Tim Horton's coffee to support her in what I honestly felt was a futile quest.  Well ... she showed me.   She has not had one of those white sticks since.

Green tea is where it is at for me.  This implies that it takes longer for the fog to clear in my head each morning and ... it also implies I do not get that much antcipated buzz.

Oh well ... life goes on.

 ::MonkeyHaHa::

Janet
Green Tea is a communist plot.  ::MonkeyNoNo::
Will it make me hinky????  Bring that!!!!

Green tea will make you hinky all over.

 ::MonkeyHaHa::

Janet

 ::MonkeyEek:: ::MonkeyShocked::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #797 1/30/09 -
Post by: Tamikosmom on January 31, 2009, 01:23:33 PM
Startin on that first cup of coffee! ::MonkeyDance:: ::MonkeyDance::

 ::MonkeyWaa::

I have not had a cup of coffee in months.  Last summer ... my longtime neighbour/friend quit smoking for the millionth time in her life.  I made her a deal.  I would give up my addiction to Tim Horton's coffee to support her in what I honestly felt was a futile quest.  Well ... she showed me.   She has not had one of those white sticks since.

Green tea is where it is at for me.  This implies that it takes longer for the fog to clear in my head each morning and ... it also implies I do not get that much antcipated buzz.

Oh well ... life goes on.

 ::MonkeyHaHa::

Janet

No worries Janet.I will have a second cup for you.... ::MonkeyTongue::

 ::MonkeyTongue::

I'm on my second cup too....unfortunately it is warmed up from yesterday.  ::MonkeyWaa::

Major water leak discovered in the wee hours; no water until it is fixed.  

The plumber is on it now, so I hope to have a fresh pot brewing shortly.

 ::MonkeyShocked::

Was there any water damage/cleanup texasmom.

Janet


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #797 1/30/09 -
Post by: Keepthefaith on January 31, 2009, 01:23:50 PM
Startin on that first cup of coffee! ::MonkeyDance:: ::MonkeyDance::

 ::MonkeyWaa::

I have not had a cup of coffee in months.  Last summer ... my longtime neighbour/friend quit smoking for the millionth time in her life.  I made her a deal.  I would give up my addiction to Tim Horton's coffee to support her in what I honestly felt was a futile quest.  Well ... she showed me.   She has not had one of those white sticks since.

Green tea is where it is at for me.  This implies that it takes longer for the fog to clear in my head each morning and ... it also implies I do not get that much antcipated buzz.

Oh well ... life goes on.

 ::MonkeyHaHa::

Janet

No worries Janet.I will have a second cup for you.... ::MonkeyTongue::

 ::MonkeyTongue::

I'm on my second cup too....unfortunately it is warmed up from yesterday.  ::MonkeyWaa::

Major water leak discovered in the wee hours; no water until it is fixed.  

The plumber is on it now, so I hope to have a fresh pot brewing shortly.

I hope that plumber's wearing a belt TM! ::MonkeyTongue::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #797 1/30/09 -
Post by: San on January 31, 2009, 01:24:15 PM
I really think the best thing to do is ignore ldstlou.
I know it is hard to ignore the nasty things she says,
But the CnG people have sent her here with an agenda
to disrupt.  She doesn't comprehend what any of us
have to reply.  Maybe she isn't capable of comprehending.
Let her do her drive by and just pretend it isn't happening.

Once again you are right.  It is time to drop the subject.  None of us are going to change our opinions on what we think is the truth.

I look at it this way, she thinks that she is right and I know I am right.  ::MonkeyWink::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #797 1/30/09 -
Post by: texasmom on January 31, 2009, 01:25:42 PM
Startin on that first cup of coffee! ::MonkeyDance:: ::MonkeyDance::

 ::MonkeyWaa::

I have not had a cup of coffee in months.  Last summer ... my longtime neighbour/friend quit smoking for the millionth time in her life.  I made her a deal.  I would give up my addiction to Tim Horton's coffee to support her in what I honestly felt was a futile quest.  Well ... she showed me.   She has not had one of those white sticks since.

Green tea is where it is at for me.  This implies that it takes longer for the fog to clear in my head each morning and ... it also implies I do not get that much antcipated buzz.

Oh well ... life goes on.

 ::MonkeyHaHa::

Janet

No worries Janet.I will have a second cup for you.... ::MonkeyTongue::

 ::MonkeyTongue::

I'm on my second cup too....unfortunately it is warmed up from yesterday.  ::MonkeyWaa::

Major water leak discovered in the wee hours; no water until it is fixed.  

The plumber is on it now, so I hope to have a fresh pot brewing shortly.

I hope that plumber's wearing a belt TM! ::MonkeyTongue::

No butt crack alerts yet!   ::MonkeyWink:: ::MonkeyHaHa::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #797 1/30/09 -
Post by: Keepthefaith on January 31, 2009, 01:26:06 PM
I really think the best thing to do is ignore ldstlou.
I know it is hard to ignore the nasty things she says,
But the CnG people have sent her here with an agenda
to disrupt.  She doesn't comprehend what any of us
have to reply.  Maybe she isn't capable of comprehending.
Let her do her drive by and just pretend it isn't happening.

Once again you are right.  It is time to drop the subject.  None of us are going to change our opinions on what we think is the truth.

I look at it this way, she thinks that she is right and I know I am right.  ::MonkeyWink::

::MonkeyCool::              ::MonkeyRoll::           ::MonkeyCool::         ::MonkeyRoll::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #797 1/30/09 -
Post by: Tamikosmom on January 31, 2009, 01:26:30 PM
Startin on that first cup of coffee! ::MonkeyDance:: ::MonkeyDance::

 ::MonkeyWaa::

I have not had a cup of coffee in months.  Last summer ... my longtime neighbour/friend quit smoking for the millionth time in her life.  I made her a deal.  I would give up my addiction to Tim Horton's coffee to support her in what I honestly felt was a futile quest.  Well ... she showed me.   She has not had one of those white sticks since.

Green tea is where it is at for me.  This implies that it takes longer for the fog to clear in my head each morning and ... it also implies I do not get that much antcipated buzz.

Oh well ... life goes on.

 ::MonkeyHaHa::

Janet
Green Tea is a communist plot.  ::MonkeyNoNo::
Will it make me hinky????  Bring that!!!!

Green tea will make you hinky all over.

 ::MonkeyHaHa::

Janet

 ::MonkeyEek:: ::MonkeyShocked::

 ::MonkeyHaHa::

I do believe that hinky implies that something is not right.  Well ... you better believe that green tea implies that something is not right ... it is not Tim Horton's coffee.

Janet


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #797 1/30/09 -
Post by: Keepthefaith on January 31, 2009, 01:27:06 PM
Startin on that first cup of coffee! ::MonkeyDance:: ::MonkeyDance::

 ::MonkeyWaa::

I have not had a cup of coffee in months.  Last summer ... my longtime neighbour/friend quit smoking for the millionth time in her life.  I made her a deal.  I would give up my addiction to Tim Horton's coffee to support her in what I honestly felt was a futile quest.  Well ... she showed me.   She has not had one of those white sticks since.

Green tea is where it is at for me.  This implies that it takes longer for the fog to clear in my head each morning and ... it also implies I do not get that much antcipated buzz.

Oh well ... life goes on.

 ::MonkeyHaHa::

Janet

No worries Janet.I will have a second cup for you.... ::MonkeyTongue::

 ::MonkeyTongue::

I'm on my second cup too....unfortunately it is warmed up from yesterday.  ::MonkeyWaa::

Major water leak discovered in the wee hours; no water until it is fixed.  

The plumber is on it now, so I hope to have a fresh pot brewing shortly.

I hope that plumber's wearing a belt TM! ::MonkeyTongue::

No butt crack alerts yet!   ::MonkeyWink:: ::MonkeyHaHa::

Up here we call it a "Vertical smile" ::MonkeyDance::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #797 1/30/09 -
Post by: Tamikosmom on January 31, 2009, 01:28:57 PM
GOOD MORNING SAN!!

Pssst Monkeys ... back on topic.

I will just tippy toe away.

Janet


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #797 1/30/09 -
Post by: hotping on January 31, 2009, 01:28:57 PM
Startin on that first cup of coffee! ::MonkeyDance:: ::MonkeyDance::

 ::MonkeyWaa::

I have not had a cup of coffee in months.  Last summer ... my longtime neighbour/friend quit smoking for the millionth time in her life.  I made her a deal.  I would give up my addiction to Tim Horton's coffee to support her in what I honestly felt was a futile quest.  Well ... she showed me.   She has not had one of those white sticks since.

Green tea is where it is at for me.  This implies that it takes longer for the fog to clear in my head each morning and ... it also implies I do not get that much antcipated buzz.

Oh well ... life goes on.

 ::MonkeyHaHa::

Janet

No worries Janet.I will have a second cup for you.... ::MonkeyTongue::

 ::MonkeyTongue::

I'm on my second cup too....unfortunately it is warmed up from yesterday.  ::MonkeyWaa::

Major water leak discovered in the wee hours; no water until it is fixed.  

The plumber is on it now, so I hope to have a fresh pot brewing shortly.

I hope that plumber's wearing a belt TM! ::MonkeyTongue::

No butt crack alerts yet!   ::MonkeyWink:: ::MonkeyHaHa::
  ::MonkeyHaHa::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #797 1/30/09 -
Post by: texasmom on January 31, 2009, 01:31:09 PM
Startin on that first cup of coffee! ::MonkeyDance:: ::MonkeyDance::

 ::MonkeyWaa::

I have not had a cup of coffee in months.  Last summer ... my longtime neighbour/friend quit smoking for the millionth time in her life.  I made her a deal.  I would give up my addiction to Tim Horton's coffee to support her in what I honestly felt was a futile quest.  Well ... she showed me.   She has not had one of those white sticks since.

Green tea is where it is at for me.  This implies that it takes longer for the fog to clear in my head each morning and ... it also implies I do not get that much antcipated buzz.

Oh well ... life goes on.

 ::MonkeyHaHa::

Janet

No worries Janet.I will have a second cup for you.... ::MonkeyTongue::

 ::MonkeyTongue::

I'm on my second cup too....unfortunately it is warmed up from yesterday.  ::MonkeyWaa::

Major water leak discovered in the wee hours; no water until it is fixed.  

The plumber is on it now, so I hope to have a fresh pot brewing shortly.

 ::MonkeyShocked::

Was there any water damage/cleanup texasmom.

Janet

I'm afraid to look, it was in the washing machine area.  No obvious inside damage; but the floor under the washer/dryer/hot water heater may be ruined.   ::MonkeyWaa:: 


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #797 1/30/09 -
Post by: hotping on January 31, 2009, 01:31:34 PM
Startin on that first cup of coffee! ::MonkeyDance:: ::MonkeyDance::

 ::MonkeyWaa::

I have not had a cup of coffee in months.  Last summer ... my longtime neighbour/friend quit smoking for the millionth time in her life.  I made her a deal.  I would give up my addiction to Tim Horton's coffee to support her in what I honestly felt was a futile quest.  Well ... she showed me.   She has not had one of those white sticks since.

Green tea is where it is at for me.  This implies that it takes longer for the fog to clear in my head each morning and ... it also implies I do not get that much antcipated buzz.

Oh well ... life goes on.

 ::MonkeyHaHa::

Janet

No worries Janet.I will have a second cup for you.... ::MonkeyTongue::

 ::MonkeyTongue::

I'm on my second cup too....unfortunately it is warmed up from yesterday.  ::MonkeyWaa::

Major water leak discovered in the wee hours; no water until it is fixed.  

The plumber is on it now, so I hope to have a fresh pot brewing shortly.

I hope that plumber's wearing a belt TM! ::MonkeyTongue::

No butt crack alerts yet!   ::MonkeyWink:: ::MonkeyHaHa::

Up here we call it a "Vertical smile" ::MonkeyDance::
  ::MonkeyShocked:: ::MonkeyHaHa::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #797 1/30/09 -
Post by: Anna on January 31, 2009, 01:32:22 PM
I really think the best thing to do is ignore ldstlou.
I know it is hard to ignore the nasty things she says,
But the CnG people have sent her here with an agenda
to disrupt.  She doesn't comprehend what any of us
have to reply.  Maybe she isn't capable of comprehending.
Let her do her drive by and just pretend it isn't happening.

Once again you are right.  It is time to drop the subject.  None of us are going to change our opinions on what we think is the truth.

I look at it this way, she thinks that she is right and I know I am right.  ::MonkeyWink::


Good Afternoon, Monkeys!

Agree!  She either refuses to read what is posted in response to her or can't comprehend what she is reading but it is infuriating to watch somebody twist what was posted in the first place as she does.

But is big waste of time and totally futile.

Why should we care if she believes or doesn't what Kermit posts?  How did everything become about convincing people of something they are determined not to be convinced about?  Few of us agree on every aspect of this tragedy and yet we manage to post without constantly trying to start fights with those we don't agree with.

Scrolling, scrolling, scrolling is where it's at. . . . .



Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #797 1/30/09 -
Post by: hotping on January 31, 2009, 01:33:53 PM
Startin on that first cup of coffee! ::MonkeyDance:: ::MonkeyDance::

 ::MonkeyWaa::

I have not had a cup of coffee in months.  Last summer ... my longtime neighbour/friend quit smoking for the millionth time in her life.  I made her a deal.  I would give up my addiction to Tim Horton's coffee to support her in what I honestly felt was a futile quest.  Well ... she showed me.   She has not had one of those white sticks since.

Green tea is where it is at for me.  This implies that it takes longer for the fog to clear in my head each morning and ... it also implies I do not get that much antcipated buzz.

Oh well ... life goes on.

 ::MonkeyHaHa::

Janet

No worries Janet.I will have a second cup for you.... ::MonkeyTongue::

 ::MonkeyTongue::

I'm on my second cup too....unfortunately it is warmed up from yesterday.  ::MonkeyWaa::

Major water leak discovered in the wee hours; no water until it is fixed.  

The plumber is on it now, so I hope to have a fresh pot brewing shortly.

 ::MonkeyShocked::

Was there any water damage/cleanup texasmom.

Janet

I'm afraid to look, it was in the washing machine area.  No obvious inside damage; but the floor under the washer/dryer/hot water heater may be ruined.   ::MonkeyWaa:: 
  ::MonkeyWaa:: Oh What a Mess...Sorry to hear this TM!


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #797 1/30/09 -
Post by: Keepthefaith on January 31, 2009, 01:34:09 PM
ARUBA COVER-UP

(http://i18.photobucket.com/albums/b104/Blondeonahd/persistence/PersistenceHansMosandRichardson.jpg)



Idstlou said: ”The footage WAS turned over to the FBI immediately.”http://scaredmonkeys.net/index.php?topic=4340.500
 Idstlou said: ”Sceen shots were sent daily as intructed by the FBI agents in charge, and the footage was turned over at the first opportunity.” http://scaredmonkeys.net/index.php?topic=4340.540
Idstlou said: “They were working with two FBI agents from Barbados. The footage was turned over to them.”http://scaredmonkeys.net/index.php?topic=4340.560

Idstlou said: “I know that there were members of Quantico on board. http://scaredmonkeys.net/index.php?topic=4340.580

"Klye:  I did not give the information to the FBI and I'm unaware of anyone relaying the possibility to them.
pg 39http://scaredmonkeys.net/index.php?topic=4340.760

Quote from: ldstlou on January 02, 2009, 05:46:43 PM
I stated that posters have said part of your credibility stems from taking down a president and working beside two others. I simply asked them to elaborate. You don't have to tell me a thing if you don't want to.

Why do you want personal information on Kermit?
http://scaredmonkeys.net/index.php?topic=4340.420




POOP SUIT ALERT



LEAK said: "This comment was made by Jug during a recent phone conversation:
All of the stuff that Kermit posted
<snip>
FBI did not know about it..."


Kyle was contacted by the FBI AFTER Freebirds sent the evidence/information to them.http://scaredmonkeys.net/index.php?topic=4340.420



CAPS HAS 4 COMPUTERS:
My brain cell + 4 Computers are thinking in all possible scenarios,
http://scaredmonkeys.net/index.php?topic=2539.120

CAPS POSTED:
Got an email today from DH, why took so long?
http://scaredmonkeys.net/index.php?topic=2539.160


I would like to know why on February 7, Caps is talking about this witness on scared monkeys,
this is the witness that would only talk to John through his lawyer, fear of reprisal, but yet Caps feels it's okay to tell the world about him on February 7!








Really Kermit? Really? as my brother would say!
You are going to keep this charade up?

Because I have seen what I believe to be irrefutable evidence that you posted pics of a family member of yours here at SM and insinuated that those pics were of yourself...correct me please if I am wrong on this please.

If this is true, did your the family member know you were doing this and approve?

If I am wrong, I apologize, because then indeed I have been mislead by those trying to discredit you.
But if I am not wrong, then your integrity has been compromised.
If I am not wrong, then you did the misleading.
If I am not wrong, and you are capable of posting pics of a family family on a public forum and insinuating they are pics of yourself, then you are capable of taking Kyle's words out of context and creating a conspiracy theory involving the crew members of the Persistence, people who devoted a lot of their own time, energy and money to search for Natalee at the request of Tim Miler and Dave Holloway.
If I am not wrong, then I believe you are also capable of falsely accusing people of assisting the ALE by sending them info from the pro-Natalee boards with no proof other than "your word".

All of this is just my humble opinion of course.

I do hope that I am wrong.

I am off to the Travel Show.
No Justice for Natalee, No Tourists for Aruba!

LDSLOU,

You've made it abundantly clear that you believe Kermit is a fraud.  I respect your right to that opinion.  Now could you sjow the same respect for those of us to believe her to actually discuss the case by scrolling past what you don't believe and stop disruption all discussions other than how you feel about Kermit?

Not that it matters and only for the record: I always believed that the frog was a fraud to.
To me the latest developments confirm my suspicions. JMHO ::MonkeyNoNo::

Bastibro thinks Kermit is a fraud.I would have nver guessed! ::MonkeyCool::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #797 1/30/09 -
Post by: hotping on January 31, 2009, 01:35:32 PM
I really think the best thing to do is ignore ldstlou.
I know it is hard to ignore the nasty things she says,
But the CnG people have sent her here with an agenda
to disrupt.  She doesn't comprehend what any of us
have to reply.  Maybe she isn't capable of comprehending.
Let her do her drive by and just pretend it isn't happening.

Once again you are right.  It is time to drop the subject.  None of us are going to change our opinions on what we think is the truth.

I look at it this way, she thinks that she is right and I know I am right.  ::MonkeyWink::


Good Afternoon, Monkeys!

Agree!  She either refuses to read what is posted in response to her or can't comprehend what she is reading but it is infuriating to watch somebody twist what was posted in the first place as she does.

But is big waste of time and totally futile.

Why should we care if she believes or doesn't what Kermit posts?  How did everything become about convincing people of something they are determined not to be convinced about?  Few of us agree on every aspect of this tragedy and yet we manage to post without constantly trying to start fights with those we don't agree with.

Scrolling, scrolling, scrolling is where it's at. . . . .


Yep...I Agree!  ::MonkeyWink::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #797 1/30/09 -
Post by: San on January 31, 2009, 01:36:24 PM
GOOD MORNING SAN!!

Pssst Monkeys ... back on topic.

I will just tippy toe away.

Janet

Good Morning Janet.

(http://i34.photobucket.com/albums/d118/Sanddrops/Scared%20Monkeys/ReminderOnTopic.gif)  ::MonkeyHaHa::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #797 1/30/09 -
Post by: Sam on January 31, 2009, 01:36:38 PM
OK this will be one of those so called drive by post. I have been a member of Scared Monkeys since a very few days after Natalee went missing. I have met on here many nice folks that I probably would like in real life. IDSTLOU is one of those. She has been very dedicated to the cause of Natalee. Just as many of you have.

I do not have the post count so many of you have and actually quit reading much here when all the changes took place with the pop ups and flashing light ads. I never gave up on Natalee. After I downloaded adblock I was again able to read here without getting so frustrated from those.One day I had 26 pop ups in a 45 minute period. Some folks never had that problem. Ok that explains my low post count and my semi desertion from Scared Monkeys.

It really bothers me that so many of our good researchers and dedicated Monkeys have left us.My own personal opinion is this has been caused by what I see happening in the way IDSTLOU has been treated lately. She is not a troll or a Johnny come lately.  She is entitled to her opinion the same as you are. I thought we were supposed to attack the post and not the poster. If we can't do that we can use our scroll button .

Of course it is nice to see Scared Monkeys continue to grow with new posters. I just do not think it means we continue to attack the long time members to where they feel it necessary to leave us. JMHO

Sam 


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #797 1/30/09 -
Post by: hotping on January 31, 2009, 01:40:37 PM
GOOD MORNING SAN!!

Pssst Monkeys ... back on topic.

I will just tippy toe away.

Janet

Good Morning Janet.

(http://i34.photobucket.com/albums/d118/Sanddrops/Scared%20Monkeys/ReminderOnTopic.gif)  ::MonkeyHaHa::
OK  ::MonkeyTongue::  ::MonkeyHaHa::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #797 1/30/09 -
Post by: Tamikosmom on January 31, 2009, 01:41:00 PM
I really think the best thing to do is ignore ldstlou.
I know it is hard to ignore the nasty things she says,
But the CnG people have sent her here with an agenda
to disrupt.  She doesn't comprehend what any of us
have to reply.  Maybe she isn't capable of comprehending.
Let her do her drive by and just pretend it isn't happening.

Once again you are right.  It is time to drop the subject.  None of us are going to change our opinions on what we think is the truth.

I look at it this way, she thinks that she is right and I know I am right.  ::MonkeyWink::

San ... dropping the topic would imply that that Aruba has won ... John Silvetti has won.  Dropping the topic would imply that Kyle Kingman's own words would become a faded memory.

My mission is to continue to post Kyle Kingman's own words as a reminder that John Silvetti assisted the enemy in the finale to the great Aruban coverup ... the enemy who has prevented just from prevailing since the getgo ... the enemy who has forced an American family to ride an onging roller coaster ride from H--- since May 30, 2005.

Janet

++++++


KYLE KINGMAN - IN HIS OWN WORDS

Kyle:
  John is not a believer in the trap. He took ALE's word as gospel that it wasn't case related, yet never studied the videos or bothered to inquire further. He had plans on doing business with Aruba and in S. America and he didn't want to hurt any feelings by talks hinting at lack of complete trust and friendship.

Kyle:  I took the proportions of the body form from the head, to shoulder, to a 90 degree angle which I believed to be the hem line of Natalee's skirt. I then took those proportions and matched them to the photo of Natalee with what she was last seen wearing. The proportions matched within an inch from head, to shoulder, to skirt line. Based on this comparison and with what we believed we saw in the Dec 29th video, Tim Miller contacted the family and told them the 99.9% comment. I told Tim not to do anything until we have forensic results back after the site is processed. Jan 7th we sampled the contents and in my opinion we found the skirt under the sand along with the other items The blue fabric was found right where the skirt is pictured. If it isn't her, it will forever haunt me as a major cosmic WTF.

Kyle:   John didn't want Tim Miller on board the Persistence because he said Tim wasn't necessary any more and was a liability.

Kyle:   He (Tim Miller) stepped off on or about the 1st of Jan to follow up on the false lead in Costa Rica IIRC.

Kyle:   The Persistence had no divers on the 7th. Tim Trahan was our diver on the 30th-Dec, but he was out of the country at the time. The Aruban divers were on the police boat, dove from their boat, and returned to their boat.
 
Kyle:  They were immediately whisked away by the Aruban police and not seen of again by us on the 7th.

Kyle:  I get done in the survey room backing up the ROV dive and head to the back deck to talk to the Polis divers and see what they sampled and see the Polis boat way in the distance heading away fast. John doesn't seem concerned at all, but I am very dissapointed, concerned, and burning inside because I have a feeling that I/we will never know what they took from the trap. That evening I talked to John asking when we plan on recovering the trap. Previously this was part of the talks and plan, but this time he doesn't seem concerned about ever looking into the trap further. After John verbally BASHED me about the trap for what I said to Tim Miller about the sand body-form and that I believed her skirt was under the sand, John pretty much committed himself to the belief the trap wasn't what we were after. This shocked me because it was exactly what we were looking for- a fish trap lost at sea with human remains.

Kyle:  I did not feel the same and we had a major difference in opinion. He [John Silvetti] was the one who never pressed ALE to be completely open with us with the trap evidence. I would have forced them to. However, John was the one paying my invoices so I was forced to sit back and hope for the best.

Kyle:   John definitely believed the Arubans at their every word.

Kyle: Remember after the Jan-7th dive which sampled the trap Richardson told John emphatically to "keep searching she's still out there in the deep ocean".

Kyle: John Silvetti told me today that he may be returning to Aruba very soon for a few days. (05/08/08)

Kyle: He's [John Silvetti] seriously making plans to open an Aruba office so he can conduct business easier in S. America and that would allow him to do that. (06/10/08)


'Scarborough Country' for July 14
updated 8:45 a.m. PT, Fri., July. 15, 2005


JUG TWITTY, NATALEE HOLLOWAY'S STEPFATHER: Beth and I have been through this emotional roller coaster. And all we want is Natalee, whether she's alive or dead. We want to bring her back to the United States, and we'll leave and they can do whatever they want to do.

http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/8551824/


'The Abrams Report' for July 1
updated 7:47 a.m. PT, Wed., July. 6, 2005


BETH HOLLOWAY TWITTY, NATALEE HOLLOWAY'S MOTHER:  We cannot forget to demand and expect to have Natalee.  Natalee deserves to return to her country.  She deserves it, and everyone knows it, Martin, every single person.  Every single person knows that.  They know it.

http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/8485029/


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #797 1/30/09 -
Post by: Tamikosmom on January 31, 2009, 01:42:13 PM
GOOD MORNING SAN!!

Pssst Monkeys ... back on topic.

I will just tippy toe away.

Janet

Good Morning Janet.

(http://i34.photobucket.com/albums/d118/Sanddrops/Scared%20Monkeys/ReminderOnTopic.gif)  ::MonkeyHaHa::

 ::MonkeyHaHa::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #797 1/30/09 -
Post by: San on January 31, 2009, 01:42:52 PM
OK this will be one of those so called drive by post. I have been a member of Scared Monkeys since a very few days after Natalee went missing. I have met on here many nice folks that I probably would like in real life. IDSTLOU is one of those. She has been very dedicated to the cause of Natalee. Just as many of you have.

I do not have the post count so many of you have and actually quit reading much here when all the changes took place with the pop ups and flashing light ads. I never gave up on Natalee. After I downloaded adblock I was again able to read here without getting so frustrated from those.One day I had 26 pop ups in a 45 minute period. Some folks never had that problem. Ok that explains my low post count and my semi desertion from Scared Monkeys.

It really bothers me that so many of our good researchers and dedicated Monkeys have left us.My own personal opinion is this has been caused by what I see happening in the way IDSTLOU has been treated lately. She is not a troll or a Johnny come lately.  She is entitled to her opinion the same as you are. I thought we were supposed to attack the post and not the poster. If we can't do that we can use our scroll button .

Of course it is nice to see Scared Monkeys continue to grow with new posters. I just do not think it means we continue to attack the long time members to where they feel it necessary to leave us. JMHO

Sam 


hiya Sam.  Our good researchers are still here and kicking.  Some have left us because they disagree with our support of Kermit and that is their right.  But some have left and have gone on to other forum(s) and they are just plain nasty and they were banned with good reason.  That is all I will say about that.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #797 1/30/09 -
Post by: wreck on January 31, 2009, 01:44:05 PM
OK this will be one of those so called drive by post. I have been a member of Scared Monkeys since a very few days after Natalee went missing. I have met on here many nice folks that I probably would like in real life. IDSTLOU is one of those. She has been very dedicated to the cause of Natalee. Just as many of you have.

I do not have the post count so many of you have and actually quit reading much here when all the changes took place with the pop ups and flashing light ads. I never gave up on Natalee. After I downloaded adblock I was again able to read here without getting so frustrated from those.One day I had 26 pop ups in a 45 minute period. Some folks never had that problem. Ok that explains my low post count and my semi desertion from Scared Monkeys.

It really bothers me that so many of our good researchers and dedicated Monkeys have left us.My own personal opinion is this has been caused by what I see happening in the way IDSTLOU has been treated lately. She is not a troll or a Johnny come lately.  She is entitled to her opinion the same as you are. I thought we were supposed to attack the post and not the poster. If we can't do that we can use our scroll button .

Of course it is nice to see Scared Monkeys continue to grow with new posters. I just do not think it means we continue to attack the long time members to where they feel it necessary to leave us. JMHO

Sam 

But that is exactly what SHE is doing -- attacking the poster -- not her "posts"!! I think we have been very patient with Lisa.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #797 1/30/09 -
Post by: San on January 31, 2009, 01:45:11 PM
I really think the best thing to do is ignore ldstlou.
I know it is hard to ignore the nasty things she says,
But the CnG people have sent her here with an agenda
to disrupt.  She doesn't comprehend what any of us
have to reply.  Maybe she isn't capable of comprehending.
Let her do her drive by and just pretend it isn't happening.

Once again you are right.  It is time to drop the subject.  None of us are going to change our opinions on what we think is the truth.

I look at it this way, she thinks that she is right and I know I am right.  ::MonkeyWink::

San ... dropping the topic would imply that that Aruba has won ... John Silvetti has won.  Dropping the topic would imply that Kyle Kingman's own words would become a faded memory.

My mission is to continue to post Kyle Kingman's own words as a reminder that John Silvetti assisted the enemy in the finale to the great Aruban coverup ... the enemy who has prevented just from prevailing since the getgo ... the enemy who has forced an American family to ride an onging roller coaster ride from H--- since May 30, 2005.

Janet

++++++



I didn't mean dropping that subject Janet.  I meant trying to explain our point of view to ldstlou.  I want you to continue to keep hammering Kyle and the crew of the Persistence.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #797 1/30/09 -
Post by: Keepthefaith on January 31, 2009, 01:54:54 PM
OK this will be one of those so called drive by post. I have been a member of Scared Monkeys since a very few days after Natalee went missing. I have met on here many nice folks that I probably would like in real life. IDSTLOU is one of those. She has been very dedicated to the cause of Natalee. Just as many of you have.

I do not have the post count so many of you have and actually quit reading much here when all the changes took place with the pop ups and flashing light ads. I never gave up on Natalee. After I downloaded adblock I was again able to read here without getting so frustrated from those.One day I had 26 pop ups in a 45 minute period. Some folks never had that problem. Ok that explains my low post count and my semi desertion from Scared Monkeys.

It really bothers me that so many of our good researchers and dedicated Monkeys have left us.My own personal opinion is this has been caused by what I see happening in the way IDSTLOU has been treated lately. She is not a troll or a Johnny come lately.  She is entitled to her opinion the same as you are. I thought we were supposed to attack the post and not the poster. If we can't do that we can use our scroll button .  

Of course it is nice to see Scared Monkeys continue to grow with new posters. I just do not think it means we continue to attack the long time members to where they feel it necessary to leave us. JMHO

Sam 


The only one i see being attacked on a daily basis is Kermit!Period.That is by the one your choosing to defend rather then condemn for her attacks.Are you defending ldstlou and her personal attacks on Kermit?TIA

KEEPTHEFAITH


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #797 1/30/09 -
Post by: Keepthefaith on January 31, 2009, 01:55:50 PM
Thanx for the Poop suit alert Kermit.Second cup of Coffee Janet! ::MonkeyTongue::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #797 1/30/09 -
Post by: klaasend on January 31, 2009, 01:56:10 PM
REMINDER - Whether we agree or disagree with LDSTLOU's opinion regarding Kyle and Kermit, LDSTLOU is spending her day today at the travel show in St. Louis reminding people that Aruba is not a safe destination  


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #797 1/30/09 -
Post by: Keepthefaith on January 31, 2009, 01:56:38 PM
Bastibro's back.How long till Johan shows up?? ::MonkeyCool::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #797 1/30/09 -
Post by: texasmom on January 31, 2009, 01:58:45 PM
Bastibro's back.How long till Johan shows up?? ::MonkeyCool::

Note: 15 guests   ::MonkeyWink::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #797 1/30/09 -
Post by: Anna on January 31, 2009, 02:00:00 PM
But that is exactly what SHE is doing -- attacking the poster -- not her "posts"!! I think we have been very patient with Lisa.


I agree, Wreck.  We have been very patient and answered her questions and been called crazy by her, etc.   She has been not only questioning but extremely nasty to Kermit and the Freebirds, etc.

Oh, well. . . . . .whatever.



Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #797 1/30/09 -
Post by: Kermit on January 31, 2009, 02:00:37 PM
ARUBA COVER-UP

(http://i18.photobucket.com/albums/b104/Blondeonahd/persistence/PersistenceHansMosandRichardson.jpg)



Idstlou said: ”The footage WAS turned over to the FBI immediately.”http://scaredmonkeys.net/index.php?topic=4340.500
 Idstlou said: ”Sceen shots were sent daily as intructed by the FBI agents in charge, and the footage was turned over at the first opportunity.” http://scaredmonkeys.net/index.php?topic=4340.540
Idstlou said: “They were working with two FBI agents from Barbados. The footage was turned over to them.”http://scaredmonkeys.net/index.php?topic=4340.560

Idstlou said: “I know that there were members of Quantico on board. http://scaredmonkeys.net/index.php?topic=4340.580

"Klye:  I did not give the information to the FBI and I'm unaware of anyone relaying the possibility to them.
pg 39http://scaredmonkeys.net/index.php?topic=4340.760

Quote from: ldstlou on January 02, 2009, 05:46:43 PM
I stated that posters have said part of your credibility stems from taking down a president and working beside two others. I simply asked them to elaborate. You don't have to tell me a thing if you don't want to.

Why do you want personal information on Kermit?
http://scaredmonkeys.net/index.php?topic=4340.420




POOP SUIT ALERT



LEAK said: "This comment was made by Jug during a recent phone conversation:
All of the stuff that Kermit posted
<snip>
FBI did not know about it..."


Kyle was contacted by the FBI AFTER Freebirds sent the evidence/information to them.http://scaredmonkeys.net/index.php?topic=4340.420



CAPS HAS 4 COMPUTERS:
My brain cell + 4 Computers are thinking in all possible scenarios,
http://scaredmonkeys.net/index.php?topic=2539.120

CAPS POSTED:
Got an email today from DH, why took so long?
http://scaredmonkeys.net/index.php?topic=2539.160


I would like to know why on February 7, Caps is talking about this witness on scared monkeys,
this is the witness that would only talk to John through his lawyer, fear of reprisal, but yet Caps feels it's okay to tell the world about him on February 7!








Really Kermit? Really? as my brother would say!
You are going to keep this charade up?

Because I have seen what I believe to be irrefutable evidence that you posted pics of a family member of yours here at SM and insinuated that those pics were of yourself...correct me please if I am wrong on this please.

If this is true, did your the family member know you were doing this and approve?

If I am wrong, I apologize, because then indeed I have been mislead by those trying to discredit you.
But if I am not wrong, then your integrity has been compromised.
If I am not wrong, then you did the misleading.
If I am not wrong, and you are capable of posting pics of a family family on a public forum and insinuating they are pics of yourself, then you are capable of taking Kyle's words out of context and creating a conspiracy theory involving the crew members of the Persistence, people who devoted a lot of their own time, energy and money to search for Natalee at the request of Tim Miler and Dave Holloway.
If I am not wrong, then I believe you are also capable of falsely accusing people of assisting the ALE by sending them info from the pro-Natalee boards with no proof other than "your word".

All of this is just my humble opinion of course.

I do hope that I am wrong.

I am off to the Travel Show.
No Justice for Natalee, No Tourists for Aruba!

Idstlou said: "If I am wrong, I apologize, because then indeed I have been mislead by those trying to discredit you. "

Kermit said: "Yes Idstlou, yes I know all about what you think you know.
These are my own personal photos."

BUT You are the one who said:

Idstlou said: "so you were secret service...and you "took down" the president you were working for?

Kermit said: "No I won't explain it to you because it's not relevant to Bringing Natalee Home."

OTHER POSTERS TRIED TO TELL YOU TOO
Maggie said: "Idstlou,
Give it up. IMO your questions about which president and how are none of your business and have nothing to do with Natalee"

Wreck said: "Kermit never claimed herself to be FBI"

klassend said: "Kermit has said they won't give you any more personal information so please quit asking now that she has answered.

BUT YOU CONTINUED:
Idstlou said: "Why am I stirring a pot
<snip>
It also appears to me part of the credibility stems from her taking down a president and working beside 2 other presidents.

Why do you want personal information on Kermit?
http://scaredmonkeys.net/index.php?topic=4340.420



ldstlou
If you believe Kermit putting pictures on of a family member has compromised her integrity,
inspite of the fact that the other free birds have come forward and confirmed her statements.
Why even Jug seems to conflict with your own posts according to the leak who is part of your information group. You are the one who wanted to know personal information by your own admission.


Idstlou said: "If I am wrong, I apologize, because then indeed I have been mislead by those trying to discredit you. "

You are wrong. And you caused me grievous harm. I hope you are happy.








Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #797 1/30/09 -
Post by: Sam on January 31, 2009, 02:00:54 PM
OK this will be one of those so called drive by post. I have been a member of Scared Monkeys since a very few days after Natalee went missing. I have met on here many nice folks that I probably would like in real life. IDSTLOU is one of those. She has been very dedicated to the cause of Natalee. Just as many of you have.

I do not have the post count so many of you have and actually quit reading much here when all the changes took place with the pop ups and flashing light ads. I never gave up on Natalee. After I downloaded adblock I was again able to read here without getting so frustrated from those.One day I had 26 pop ups in a 45 minute period. Some folks never had that problem. Ok that explains my low post count and my semi desertion from Scared Monkeys.

It really bothers me that so many of our good researchers and dedicated Monkeys have left us.My own personal opinion is this has been caused by what I see happening in the way IDSTLOU has been treated lately. She is not a troll or a Johnny come lately.  She is entitled to her opinion the same as you are. I thought we were supposed to attack the post and not the poster. If we can't do that we can use our scroll button .

Of course it is nice to see Scared Monkeys continue to grow with new posters. I just do not think it means we continue to attack the long time members to where they feel it necessary to leave us. JMHO

Sam 

But that is exactly what SHE is doing -- attacking the poster -- not her "posts"!! I think we have been very patient with Lisa.

You are right Wreck she was questioning the poster. Heck maybe I should stay away from this topic.

I do know that her heart is in the right place. Just as the majority  are. I still want Justice for Natalee and her family. And Idstlou is going to the protest for Natalee in St. Louis toward that goal. Thanks Lisa.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #797 1/30/09 -
Post by: Tamikosmom on January 31, 2009, 02:01:37 PM
OK this will be one of those so called drive by post. I have been a member of Scared Monkeys since a very few days after Natalee went missing. I have met on here many nice folks that I probably would like in real life. IDSTLOU is one of those. She has been very dedicated to the cause of Natalee. Just as many of you have.

I do not have the post count so many of you have and actually quit reading much here when all the changes took place with the pop ups and flashing light ads. I never gave up on Natalee. After I downloaded adblock I was again able to read here without getting so frustrated from those.One day I had 26 pop ups in a 45 minute period. Some folks never had that problem. Ok that explains my low post count and my semi desertion from Scared Monkeys.

It really bothers me that so many of our good researchers and dedicated Monkeys have left us.My own personal opinion is this has been caused by what I see happening in the way IDSTLOU has been treated lately. She is not a troll or a Johnny come lately.  She is entitled to her opinion the same as you are. I thought we were supposed to attack the post and not the poster. If we can't do that we can use our scroll button .

Of course it is nice to see Scared Monkeys continue to grow with new posters. I just do not think it means we continue to attack the long time members to where they feel it necessary to leave us. JMHO

Sam 


Sam ... without backup to the contrary ... Lou has without mercy undermine Kermit's integrity  in regards to the posts which expose the John Silvetti betrayal of Natalee Holloway's family.

I am rejoicing that this travesty which abetted the enemy in the finale to the great Aruban coverup was revealed.  However ... I am angry that this travesty took place.  I am angry at John Silvetti.

Lou is far from rejoicing that Kermit exposed this travesty again Natalee Holloway's family and ... she continues to uphold John Silvetti.

I just do not get it.  I do not think for one minute Lou would be taking a position that supported John Silvetti if it there had been a possibility that her loved one had been place in that trap/cage.

Sincerely, Janet


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #797 1/30/09 -
Post by: Keepthefaith on January 31, 2009, 02:07:27 PM
ARUBA COVER-UP

(http://i18.photobucket.com/albums/b104/Blondeonahd/persistence/PersistenceHansMosandRichardson.jpg)



Idstlou said: ”The footage WAS turned over to the FBI immediately.”http://scaredmonkeys.net/index.php?topic=4340.500
 Idstlou said: ”Sceen shots were sent daily as intructed by the FBI agents in charge, and the footage was turned over at the first opportunity.” http://scaredmonkeys.net/index.php?topic=4340.540
Idstlou said: “They were working with two FBI agents from Barbados. The footage was turned over to them.”http://scaredmonkeys.net/index.php?topic=4340.560

Idstlou said: “I know that there were members of Quantico on board. http://scaredmonkeys.net/index.php?topic=4340.580

"Klye:  I did not give the information to the FBI and I'm unaware of anyone relaying the possibility to them.
pg 39http://scaredmonkeys.net/index.php?topic=4340.760

Quote from: ldstlou on January 02, 2009, 05:46:43 PM
I stated that posters have said part of your credibility stems from taking down a president and working beside two others. I simply asked them to elaborate. You don't have to tell me a thing if you don't want to.

Why do you want personal information on Kermit?
http://scaredmonkeys.net/index.php?topic=4340.420




POOP SUIT ALERT



LEAK said: "This comment was made by Jug during a recent phone conversation:
All of the stuff that Kermit posted
<snip>
FBI did not know about it..."


Kyle was contacted by the FBI AFTER Freebirds sent the evidence/information to them.http://scaredmonkeys.net/index.php?topic=4340.420



CAPS HAS 4 COMPUTERS:
My brain cell + 4 Computers are thinking in all possible scenarios,
http://scaredmonkeys.net/index.php?topic=2539.120

CAPS POSTED:
Got an email today from DH, why took so long?
http://scaredmonkeys.net/index.php?topic=2539.160


I would like to know why on February 7, Caps is talking about this witness on scared monkeys,
this is the witness that would only talk to John through his lawyer, fear of reprisal, but yet Caps feels it's okay to tell the world about him on February 7!








Really Kermit? Really? as my brother would say!
You are going to keep this charade up?

Because I have seen what I believe to be irrefutable evidence that you posted pics of a family member of yours here at SM and insinuated that those pics were of yourself...correct me please if I am wrong on this please.

If this is true, did your the family member know you were doing this and approve?

If I am wrong, I apologize, because then indeed I have been mislead by those trying to discredit you.
But if I am not wrong, then your integrity has been compromised.
If I am not wrong, then you did the misleading.
If I am not wrong, and you are capable of posting pics of a family family on a public forum and insinuating they are pics of yourself, then you are capable of taking Kyle's words out of context and creating a conspiracy theory involving the crew members of the Persistence, people who devoted a lot of their own time, energy and money to search for Natalee at the request of Tim Miler and Dave Holloway.
If I am not wrong, then I believe you are also capable of falsely accusing people of assisting the ALE by sending them info from the pro-Natalee boards with no proof other than "your word".

All of this is just my humble opinion of course.

I do hope that I am wrong.

I am off to the Travel Show.
No Justice for Natalee, No Tourists for Aruba!

Idstlou said: "If I am wrong, I apologize, because then indeed I have been mislead by those trying to discredit you. "

Kermit said: "Yes Idstlou, yes I know all about what you think you know.
These are my own personal photos."

BUT You are the one who said:

Idstlou said: "so you were secret service...and you "took down" the president you were working for?

Kermit said: "No I won't explain it to you because it's not relevant to Bringing Natalee Home."

OTHER POSTERS TRIED TO TELL YOU TOO
Maggie said: "Idstlou,
Give it up. IMO your questions about which president and how are none of your business and have nothing to do with Natalee"

Wreck said: "Kermit never claimed herself to be FBI"

klassend said: "Kermit has said they won't give you any more personal information so please quit asking now that she has answered.

BUT YOU CONTINUED:
Idstlou said: "Why am I stirring a pot
<snip>
It also appears to me part of the credibility stems from her taking down a president and working beside 2 other presidents.

Why do you want personal information on Kermit?
http://scaredmonkeys.net/index.php?topic=4340.420



ldstlou
If you believe Kermit putting pictures on of a family member has compromised her integrity,
inspite of the fact that the other free birds have come forward and confirmed her statements.
Why even Jug seems to conflict with your own posts according to the leak who is part of your information group. You are the one who wanted to know personal information by your own admission.


Idstlou said: "If I am wrong, I apologize, because then indeed I have been mislead by those trying to discredit you. "

You are wrong. And you caused me grievous harm. I hope you are happy.








Any questions Sam?


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #797 1/30/09 -
Post by: Kermit on January 31, 2009, 02:08:12 PM
Magnolia is the voice of reason and someone I admire for her truth and honesty and I won't respond any further to Idstlou's posts.
How could Idstlou make up for what she caused?
She can't.
I'll forgive her,  eventually.

POOP SUITS MAY BE REMOVED

back to the pond.
ribbit





Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #797 1/30/09 -
Post by: Edward on January 31, 2009, 02:08:14 PM
O/T posted in the Caylee thread:  ::MonkeyHaHa::

http://www.youtube.com/v/MO1SvN9ygh4&hl=en&fs=1

Thanks Klaas.

I realy enjoyed that clip.  Thanks for sharing.  The tune and lyrics are catchy.  I know will be humming "I LIKE YOU" all day.

Janet

I love this video..  ::MonkeyCool::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #797 1/30/09 -
Post by: Keepthefaith on January 31, 2009, 02:09:39 PM
Magnolia is the voice of reason and someone I admire for her truth and honesty and I won't respond any further to Idstlou's posts.
How could Idstlou make up for what she caused?
She can't.
I'll forgive her,  eventually.

POOP SUITS MAY BE REMOVED

back to the pond.
ribbit

You frogs are elusive little sucker's!






Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #797 1/30/09 -
Post by: Tamikosmom on January 31, 2009, 02:10:00 PM
REMINDER - Whether we agree or disagree with LDSTLOU's opinion regarding Kyle and Kermit, LDSTLOU is spending her day today at the travel show in St. Louis reminding people that Aruba is not a safe destination  

I have prayfully and financially supported the trade show protests in the past and ... I am thankful that Vicky, Lou and others (?) ... are continuing to support Beth Holloway's call for a boycott againt Aruba until justice is forthcoming in regards to her daughter's diappearance.

However ... Lou's support of John Silvetti is such a conflict of interest.  According to Kyle Kingman's own words ... John Silvetti assisted in the finale to the great Aruban coverup which translates into an utter betrayal of Natalee Holloway's family.

I apologize but ... it does not make sense.

 ::MonkeyNoNo::

Janet


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #797 1/30/09 -
Post by: Keepthefaith on January 31, 2009, 02:10:05 PM
Magnolia is the voice of reason and someone I admire for her truth and honesty and I won't respond any further to Idstlou's posts.
How could Idstlou make up for what she caused?
She can't.
I'll forgive her,  eventually.

POOP SUITS MAY BE REMOVED

back to the pond.
ribbit

You frogs are elusive little sucker's!





You frogs are elusive little sucker's!



Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #797 1/30/09 -
Post by: Kermit on January 31, 2009, 02:10:28 PM
OK this will be one of those so called drive by post. I have been a member of Scared Monkeys since a very few days after Natalee went missing. I have met on here many nice folks that I probably would like in real life. IDSTLOU is one of those. She has been very dedicated to the cause of Natalee. Just as many of you have.

I do not have the post count so many of you have and actually quit reading much here when all the changes took place with the pop ups and flashing light ads. I never gave up on Natalee. After I downloaded adblock I was again able to read here without getting so frustrated from those.One day I had 26 pop ups in a 45 minute period. Some folks never had that problem. Ok that explains my low post count and my semi desertion from Scared Monkeys.

It really bothers me that so many of our good researchers and dedicated Monkeys have left us.My own personal opinion is this has been caused by what I see happening in the way IDSTLOU has been treated lately. She is not a troll or a Johnny come lately.  She is entitled to her opinion the same as you are. I thought we were supposed to attack the post and not the poster. If we can't do that we can use our scroll button .

Of course it is nice to see Scared Monkeys continue to grow with new posters. I just do not think it means we continue to attack the long time members to where they feel it necessary to leave us. JMHO

Sam 


Sam ... without backup to the contrary ... Lou has without mercy undermine Kermit's integrity  in regards to the posts which expose the John Silvetti betrayal of Natalee Holloway's family.

I am rejoicing that this travesty which abetted the enemy in the finale to the great Aruban coverup was revealed.  However ... I am angry that this travesty took place.  I am angry at John Silvetti.

Lou is far from rejoicing that Kermit exposed this travesty again Natalee Holloway's family and ... she continues to uphold John Silvetti.

I just do not get it.  I do not think for one minute Lou would be taking a position that supported John Silvetti if it there had been a possibility that her loved one had been place in that trap/cage.

Sincerely, Janet

I swear Janet you have an amazing gift that you give to the world.
You should be writing/authoring books, articles for a major newspaper or something.
Very talented. Tell Mr. Veggie hello from kermit.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #797 1/30/09 -
Post by: Edward on January 31, 2009, 02:10:42 PM
Jan. 27, 2009 -- The world's frogs face yet another threat to their survival: overeating by humans.

http://dsc.discovery.com/news/2009/01/27/frog-extinction.html

 ::MonkeyWink::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #797 1/30/09 -
Post by: Keepthefaith on January 31, 2009, 02:15:14 PM
OK this will be one of those so called drive by post. I have been a member of Scared Monkeys since a very few days after Natalee went missing. I have met on here many nice folks that I probably would like in real life. IDSTLOU is one of those. She has been very dedicated to the cause of Natalee. Just as many of you have.

I do not have the post count so many of you have and actually quit reading much here when all the changes took place with the pop ups and flashing light ads. I never gave up on Natalee. After I downloaded adblock I was again able to read here without getting so frustrated from those.One day I had 26 pop ups in a 45 minute period. Some folks never had that problem. Ok that explains my low post count and my semi desertion from Scared Monkeys.

It really bothers me that so many of our good researchers and dedicated Monkeys have left us.My own personal opinion is this has been caused by what I see happening in the way IDSTLOU has been treated lately. She is not a troll or a Johnny come lately.  She is entitled to her opinion the same as you are. I thought we were supposed to attack the post and not the poster. If we can't do that we can use our scroll button .

Of course it is nice to see Scared Monkeys continue to grow with new posters. I just do not think it means we continue to attack the long time members to where they feel it necessary to leave us. JMHO

Sam 


Sam ... without backup to the contrary ... Lou has without mercy undermine Kermit's integrity  in regards to the posts which expose the John Silvetti betrayal of Natalee Holloway's family.

I am rejoicing that this travesty which abetted the enemy in the finale to the great Aruban coverup was revealed.  However ... I am angry that this travesty took place.  I am angry at John Silvetti.

Lou is far from rejoicing that Kermit exposed this travesty again Natalee Holloway's family and ... she continues to uphold John Silvetti.

I just do not get it.  I do not think for one minute Lou would be taking a position that supported John Silvetti if it there had been a possibility that her loved one had been place in that trap/cage.

Sincerely, Janet

I swear Janet you have an amazing gift that you give to the world.
You should be writing/authoring books, articles for a major newspaper or something.
Very talented. Tell Mr. Veggie hello from kermit.


Take it easy Kermit!Janet is already feeling Hinky from the green tea and with added praise from you.who know's what comes next........ ::MonkeyHaHa::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #797 1/30/09 -
Post by: texasmom on January 31, 2009, 02:30:06 PM
Kermit comments....

Quote
Magnolia is the voice of reason and someone I admire for her truth and honesty...

Quote
I swear Janet you have an amazing gift that you give to the world.
You should be writing/authoring books, articles for a major newspaper or something.
Very talented.

I agree!   ::MonkeyDance::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #797 1/30/09 -
Post by: Blonde on January 31, 2009, 02:35:21 PM
ARUBA COVER-UP

(http://i18.photobucket.com/albums/b104/Blondeonahd/persistence/PersistenceHansMosandRichardson.jpg)



Idstlou said: ”The footage WAS turned over to the FBI immediately.”http://scaredmonkeys.net/index.php?topic=4340.500
 Idstlou said: ”Sceen shots were sent daily as intructed by the FBI agents in charge, and the footage was turned over at the first opportunity.” http://scaredmonkeys.net/index.php?topic=4340.540
Idstlou said: “They were working with two FBI agents from Barbados. The footage was turned over to them.”http://scaredmonkeys.net/index.php?topic=4340.560

Idstlou said: “I know that there were members of Quantico on board. http://scaredmonkeys.net/index.php?topic=4340.580

"Klye:  I did not give the information to the FBI and I'm unaware of anyone relaying the possibility to them.
pg 39http://scaredmonkeys.net/index.php?topic=4340.760

Quote from: ldstlou on January 02, 2009, 05:46:43 PM
I stated that posters have said part of your credibility stems from taking down a president and working beside two others. I simply asked them to elaborate. You don't have to tell me a thing if you don't want to.

Why do you want personal information on Kermit?
http://scaredmonkeys.net/index.php?topic=4340.420




POOP SUIT ALERT



LEAK said: "This comment was made by Jug during a recent phone conversation:
All of the stuff that Kermit posted
<snip>
FBI did not know about it..."


Kyle was contacted by the FBI AFTER Freebirds sent the evidence/information to them.http://scaredmonkeys.net/index.php?topic=4340.420



CAPS HAS 4 COMPUTERS:
My brain cell + 4 Computers are thinking in all possible scenarios,
http://scaredmonkeys.net/index.php?topic=2539.120

CAPS POSTED:
Got an email today from DH, why took so long?
http://scaredmonkeys.net/index.php?topic=2539.160


I would like to know why on February 7, Caps is talking about this witness on scared monkeys,
this is the witness that would only talk to John through his lawyer, fear of reprisal, but yet Caps feels it's okay to tell the world about him on February 7!








Really Kermit? Really? as my brother would say!
You are going to keep this charade up?

Because I have seen what I believe to be irrefutable evidence that you posted pics of a family member of yours here at SM and insinuated that those pics were of yourself...correct me please if I am wrong on this please.

If this is true, did your the family member know you were doing this and approve?

If I am wrong, I apologize, because then indeed I have been mislead by those trying to discredit you.
But if I am not wrong, then your integrity has been compromised.
If I am not wrong, then you did the misleading.
If I am not wrong, and you are capable of posting pics of a family family on a public forum and insinuating they are pics of yourself, then you are capable of taking Kyle's words out of context and creating a conspiracy theory involving the crew members of the Persistence, people who devoted a lot of their own time, energy and money to search for Natalee at the request of Tim Miler and Dave Holloway.
If I am not wrong, then I believe you are also capable of falsely accusing people of assisting the ALE by sending them info from the pro-Natalee boards with no proof other than "your word".

All of this is just my humble opinion of course.

I do hope that I am wrong.

I am off to the Travel Show.
No Justice for Natalee, No Tourists for Aruba!

LDSLOU,

You've made it abundantly clear that you believe Kermit is a fraud.  I respect your right to that opinion.  Now could you sjow the same respect for those of us to believe her to actually discuss the case by scrolling past what you don't believe and stop disruption all discussions other than how you feel about Kermit?

Not that it matters and only for the record: I always believed that the frog was a fraud to.
To me the latest developments confirm my suspicions. JMHO ::MonkeyNoNo::

bastibro are you still posting at BNH.
Just asking...


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #797 1/30/09 -
Post by: texasmom on January 31, 2009, 02:38:29 PM
ARUBA COVER-UP

(http://i18.photobucket.com/albums/b104/Blondeonahd/persistence/PersistenceHansMosandRichardson.jpg)
Idstlou said: ”The footage WAS turned over to the FBI immediately.”http://scaredmonkeys.net/index.php?topic=4340.500
 Idstlou said: ”Sceen shots were sent daily as intructed by the FBI agents in charge, and the footage was turned over at the first opportunity.” http://scaredmonkeys.net/index.php?topic=4340.540
Idstlou said: “They were working with two FBI agents from Barbados. The footage was turned over to them.”http://scaredmonkeys.net/index.php?topic=4340.560
Idstlou said: “I know that there were members of Quantico on board. http://scaredmonkeys.net/index.php?topic=4340.580
"Klye:  I did not give the information to the FBI and I'm unaware of anyone relaying the possibility to them.
pg 39http://scaredmonkeys.net/index.php?topic=4340.760
Quote from: ldstlou on January 02, 2009, 05:46:43 PM
I stated that posters have said part of your credibility stems from taking down a president and working beside two others. I simply asked them to elaborate. You don't have to tell me a thing if you don't want to.

Why do you want personal information on Kermit?
http://scaredmonkeys.net/index.php?topic=4340.420

POOP SUIT ALERT

LEAK said: "This comment was made by Jug during a recent phone conversation:
All of the stuff that Kermit posted
<snip>
FBI did not know about it..."
Kyle was contacted by the FBI AFTER Freebirds sent the evidence/information to them.http://scaredmonkeys.net/index.php?topic=4340.420

CAPS HAS 4 COMPUTERS:
My brain cell + 4 Computers are thinking in all possible scenarios,
http://scaredmonkeys.net/index.php?topic=2539.120
CAPS POSTED:
Got an email today from DH, why took so long?
http://scaredmonkeys.net/index.php?topic=2539.160
I would like to know why on February 7, Caps is talking about this witness on scared monkeys,
this is the witness that would only talk to John through his lawyer, fear of reprisal, but yet Caps feels it's okay to tell the world about him on February 7!

Really Kermit? Really? as my brother would say!
You are going to keep this charade up?

Because I have seen what I believe to be irrefutable evidence that you posted pics of a family member of yours here at SM and insinuated that those pics were of yourself...correct me please if I am wrong on this please.

If this is true, did your the family member know you were doing this and approve?

If I am wrong, I apologize, because then indeed I have been mislead by those trying to discredit you.
But if I am not wrong, then your integrity has been compromised.
If I am not wrong, then you did the misleading.
If I am not wrong, and you are capable of posting pics of a family family on a public forum and insinuating they are pics of yourself, then you are capable of taking Kyle's words out of context and creating a conspiracy theory involving the crew members of the Persistence, people who devoted a lot of their own time, energy and money to search for Natalee at the request of Tim Miler and Dave Holloway.
If I am not wrong, then I believe you are also capable of falsely accusing people of assisting the ALE by sending them info from the pro-Natalee boards with no proof other than "your word".

All of this is just my humble opinion of course.

I do hope that I am wrong.

I am off to the Travel Show.
No Justice for Natalee, No Tourists for Aruba!

Idstlou said: "If I am wrong, I apologize, because then indeed I have been mislead by those trying to discredit you. "

Kermit said: "Yes Idstlou, yes I know all about what you think you know.
These are my own personal photos."

BUT You are the one who said:

Idstlou said: "so you were secret service...and you "took down" the president you were working for?

Kermit said: "No I won't explain it to you because it's not relevant to Bringing Natalee Home."

OTHER POSTERS TRIED TO TELL YOU TOO
Maggie said: "Idstlou,
Give it up. IMO your questions about which president and how are none of your business and have nothing to do with Natalee"

Wreck said: "Kermit never claimed herself to be FBI"

klassend said: "Kermit has said they won't give you any more personal information so please quit asking now that she has answered.

BUT YOU CONTINUED:
Idstlou said: "Why am I stirring a pot
<snip>
It also appears to me part of the credibility stems from her taking down a president and working beside 2 other presidents.

Why do you want personal information on Kermit?
http://scaredmonkeys.net/index.php?topic=4340.420

ldstlou
If you believe Kermit putting pictures on of a family member has compromised her integrity,
inspite of the fact that the other free birds have come forward and confirmed her statements.
Why even Jug seems to conflict with your own posts according to the leak who is part of your information group. You are the one who wanted to know personal information by your own admission.


Idstlou said: "If I am wrong, I apologize, because then indeed I have been mislead by those trying to discredit you. "

You are wrong. And you caused me grievous harm. I hope you are happy.

 ::MonkeyNoNo:: ::MonkeyWaa::



Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #797 1/30/09 -
Post by: Ree on January 31, 2009, 02:40:32 PM
REMINDER - Whether we agree or disagree with LDSTLOU's opinion regarding Kyle and Kermit, LDSTLOU is spending her day today at the travel show in St. Louis reminding people that Aruba is not a safe destination  

Klass,

There is no doubt LDSLOU is dedicated to Natalee.  However, truth be told I considered attending this event myself.  I reconsidered, because of the recent activity whether or not I felt comfortable outing my real identity.  I discussed with my husband and decided it wasn't worth it.

Sam,

While I am faily new to the forum compared to many, we are not slamming the old timers.  I came here to discuss the case.  There are others who seem to have a problem allowing certain topics to be discussed.  Kermit's credentials are irrelavent as long as their is proof that the post are accurate.  There is enough for me.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #797 1/30/09 -
Post by: Ree on January 31, 2009, 02:44:15 PM
How many posts do I have to make before I get one of those personal post fixers that Janet has? ::MonkeyLaugh::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #797 1/30/09 -
Post by: klaasend on January 31, 2009, 02:46:29 PM
REMINDER - Whether we agree or disagree with LDSTLOU's opinion regarding Kyle and Kermit, LDSTLOU is spending her day today at the travel show in St. Louis reminding people that Aruba is not a safe destination  

Klass,

There is no doubt LDSLOU is dedicated to Natalee.  However, truth be told I considered attending this event myself.  I reconsidered, because of the recent activity whether or not I felt comfortable outing my real identity.  I discussed with my husband and decided it wasn't worth it.

Sam,

While I am faily new to the forum compared to many, we are not slamming the old timers.  I came here to discuss the case.  There are others who seem to have a problem allowing certain topics to be discussed.  Kermit's credentials are irrelavent as long as their is proof that the post are accurate.  There is enough for me.

Ree - I agree.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #797 1/30/09 -
Post by: Keepthefaith on January 31, 2009, 02:48:04 PM
OK this will be one of those so called drive by post. I have been a member of Scared Monkeys since a very few days after Natalee went missing. I have met on here many nice folks that I probably would like in real life. IDSTLOU is one of those. She has been very dedicated to the cause of Natalee. Just as many of you have.

I do not have the post count so many of you have and actually quit reading much here when all the changes took place with the pop ups and flashing light ads. I never gave up on Natalee. After I downloaded adblock I was again able to read here without getting so frustrated from those.One day I had 26 pop ups in a 45 minute period. Some folks never had that problem. Ok that explains my low post count and my semi desertion from Scared Monkeys.

It really bothers me that so many of our good researchers and dedicated Monkeys have left us.My own personal opinion is this has been caused by what I see happening in the way IDSTLOU has been treated lately. She is not a troll or a Johnny come lately.  She is entitled to her opinion the same as you are. I thought we were supposed to attack the post and not the poster. If we can't do that we can use our scroll button .  

Of course it is nice to see Scared Monkeys continue to grow with new posters. I just do not think it means we continue to attack the long time members to where they feel it necessary to leave us. JMHO

Sam 


The only one i see being attacked on a daily basis is Kermit!Period.That is by the one your choosing to defend rather then condemn for her attacks.Are you defending ldstlou and her personal attacks on Kermit?TIA

KEEPTHEFAITH

BUMP


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #797 1/30/09 -
Post by: Sam on January 31, 2009, 02:54:08 PM
OK this will be one of those so called drive by post. I have been a member of Scared Monkeys since a very few days after Natalee went missing. I have met on here many nice folks that I probably would like in real life. IDSTLOU is one of those. She has been very dedicated to the cause of Natalee. Just as many of you have.

I do not have the post count so many of you have and actually quit reading much here when all the changes took place with the pop ups and flashing light ads. I never gave up on Natalee. After I downloaded adblock I was again able to read here without getting so frustrated from those.One day I had 26 pop ups in a 45 minute period. Some folks never had that problem. Ok that explains my low post count and my semi desertion from Scared Monkeys.

It really bothers me that so many of our good researchers and dedicated Monkeys have left us.My own personal opinion is this has been caused by what I see happening in the way IDSTLOU has been treated lately. She is not a troll or a Johnny come lately.  She is entitled to her opinion the same as you are. I thought we were supposed to attack the post and not the poster. If we can't do that we can use our scroll button .

Of course it is nice to see Scared Monkeys continue to grow with new posters. I just do not think it means we continue to attack the long time members to where they feel it necessary to leave us. JMHO

Sam 

But that is exactly what SHE is doing -- attacking the poster -- not her "posts"!! I think we have been very patient with Lisa.

ok this a repost. hoping more of you see it.

You are right Wreck she was questioning the poster. Heck maybe I should stay away from this topic.

I do know that her heart is in the right place. Just as the majority  are. I still want Justice for Natalee and her family. And Idstlou is going to the protest for Natalee in St. Louis toward that goal. Thanks Lisa.

Ree , I have not met Lisa personally but I have met some Monkeys really nice folks. The funny thing is I still think of them as their poster names. So regardless of what there real life names are they will always be the names I became acquainted with on here.

Sam


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #797 1/30/09 -
Post by: 2NJSons_Mom on January 31, 2009, 02:54:25 PM
How many posts do I have to make before I get one of those personal post fixers that Janet has? ::MonkeyLaugh::

Post count doesn't have anything to do with it.  If one of us are here and can fix it, just ask, Ree.    ::MonkeyWink::



Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #797 1/30/09 -
Post by: Tamikosmom on January 31, 2009, 02:58:07 PM
OK this will be one of those so called drive by post. I have been a member of Scared Monkeys since a very few days after Natalee went missing. I have met on here many nice folks that I probably would like in real life. IDSTLOU is one of those. She has been very dedicated to the cause of Natalee. Just as many of you have.

I do not have the post count so many of you have and actually quit reading much here when all the changes took place with the pop ups and flashing light ads. I never gave up on Natalee. After I downloaded adblock I was again able to read here without getting so frustrated from those.One day I had 26 pop ups in a 45 minute period. Some folks never had that problem. Ok that explains my low post count and my semi desertion from Scared Monkeys.

It really bothers me that so many of our good researchers and dedicated Monkeys have left us.My own personal opinion is this has been caused by what I see happening in the way IDSTLOU has been treated lately. She is not a troll or a Johnny come lately.  She is entitled to her opinion the same as you are. I thought we were supposed to attack the post and not the poster. If we can't do that we can use our scroll button .

Of course it is nice to see Scared Monkeys continue to grow with new posters. I just do not think it means we continue to attack the long time members to where they feel it necessary to leave us. JMHO

Sam 


Sam ... without backup to the contrary ... Lou has without mercy undermine Kermit's integrity  in regards to the posts which expose the John Silvetti betrayal of Natalee Holloway's family.

I am rejoicing that this travesty which abetted the enemy in the finale to the great Aruban coverup was revealed.  However ... I am angry that this travesty took place.  I am angry at John Silvetti.

Lou is far from rejoicing that Kermit exposed this travesty again Natalee Holloway's family and ... she continues to uphold John Silvetti.

I just do not get it.  I do not think for one minute Lou would be taking a position that supported John Silvetti if it there had been a possibility that her loved one had been place in that trap/cage.

Sincerely, Janet

I swear Janet you have an amazing gift that you give to the world.
You should be writing/authoring books, articles for a major newspaper or something.
Very talented. Tell Mr. Veggie hello from kermit.


Thanks Kermit.

I do have a passion for writing but ... it is confined for the most part to the Natalee Holloway case and ... eight journals that synopsis moments in the lives of my three grown kids and ... my five grandkids ... from my perspective.

After I am pushing up daisies ... what each member of my family does with their respective journal is entirely up to them.

Veggie says "Hi" and ... "Janet ... get off that computer".

Later, Janet
11:55 AM PT

Janet


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #797 1/30/09 -
Post by: Tamikosmom on January 31, 2009, 03:01:08 PM
How many posts do I have to make before I get one of those personal post fixers that Janet has? ::MonkeyLaugh::

Klaas will have to assign another Mod to the site.  Klaas and the current  Mods are kept busy editing my posts.

 ::MonkeyHaHa::

Janet


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #797 1/30/09 -
Post by: Keepthefaith on January 31, 2009, 03:04:54 PM
Idstlou said: "If I am wrong, I apologize, because then indeed I have been mislead by those trying to discredit you. "


KERMIT
"You are wrong. And you caused me grievous harm. I hope you are happy."


 ::MonkeyNoNo::  Off to the gym to digest why someone would harm the Frog!Why would that be and for what reason?

God Bless

KEEPTHEFAITH


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #797 1/30/09 -
Post by: texasmom on January 31, 2009, 03:06:43 PM
http://www.amigoe.com/artman/publish/artikel_52227.php

Google translation:

VVD chooses commonwealth for all islands
31 Jan, 2009, 14:30 (GMT -04:00)

  Email this article
  Print this article
 
(http://www.amigoe.com/artman/uploads/31-curacao-voor.gif)
Johan Remkes
AMSTERDAM - If it is the VVD, the Netherlands in the near future as possible to the island overseas. Johan Remkes Netherlands wants a commonwealth is concerned with all six islands. "The government now needs another course to navigate and further amendments to the Statute committed. It is not too late, "said Remkes, which Antillean and Aruban Affairs spokesman for the opposition party.

by Christel of Bebber

The proposal of all Remkes Antilles and Aruba in a year or five autonomous. "The Royal House remains a common issue, as Defense and Foreign Affairs, said the politician. "But if the islands have everything in order, we should also not interfere. For one island will be faster than the other, but the pace is not all to be the same. "He hopes that the Netherlands in the islands would insist on this idea. "But it depends on what the islands themselves want."
In the past some saw Remkes commonwealth status only play for Curaçao and St. Maarten. It changed. "We have the art of letting go better control. Netherlands, which tends to interfere with you. And the islands have long toes when it comes to autonomy, but want the account to deposit in the Netherlands. This is not compatible. "

No financial assistance
According Remkes should be clear that the islands will soon no longer count on assistance from the Netherlands. "Assistance in the broadest sense of the word may in the Statute. Then of course I do not talk about emergencies. But I see no reason for example, include what to do financially. The debt ensures that the islands on its own financial feet. Then it is over. During the parliamentary discussions on Aruba, I noticed that not everyone in the West has landed, but that is it. For Curacao and St. Maarten stops in 2012 for Aruba this is the last year. "
Remkes, the commonwealth thought in the statute setting. "The government should focus on further amendments to the Statute than intended. The time to do that we have it. My belief that the new ratios per 1 January, 2010 can go to zero decreased. The legislative process is not feasible, then silence, I still have the agreement with St. Maarten to the lot in terms of law enforcement and good governance for that time in order to have. "


Group continues
The idea of Remkes, while more than what he previously suggested, but less than the ideals of Labor Aptroot Charlie, also a member of the Second Chamber. They argued in a recent column for complete independence requirements - as PVV'er Hero Brinkman earlier - and even themselves from the Kingdom steps. "He did so personally, you may. There will be more people in the best group that way. But I am spokesperson and I go over the policy, "said Remkes.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #797 1/30/09 -
Post by: Anna on January 31, 2009, 03:09:21 PM
REMINDER - Whether we agree or disagree with LDSTLOU's opinion regarding Kyle and Kermit, LDSTLOU is spending her day today at the travel show in St. Louis reminding people that Aruba is not a safe destination  


Something HotShots and ******* have both participated in as well. 

I don't see this as some sort of license to attack other posters, however.



Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #797 1/30/09 -
Post by: Tamikosmom on January 31, 2009, 03:11:01 PM
Idstlou said: "If I am wrong, I apologize, because then indeed I have been mislead by those trying to discredit you. "


KERMIT

"You are wrong. And you caused me grievous harm. I hope you are happy."



 ::MonkeyNoNo::  Off to the gym to digest why someone would harm the Frog!Why would that be and for what reason?

God Bless

KEEPTHEFAITH

Try not to let the hurt get you down Kermit.  Stay focus on your 3 1/2 year passion to expose the corrupt Aruban investigation that has prevented justice from prevailing for an 18 year old American citizen.  That focus must include those who are abetting thsy corrupt Aruban investigation.

Hugs

Janet



Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #797 1/30/09 -
Post by: Magnolia on January 31, 2009, 03:11:36 PM
Magnolia is the voice of reason and someone I admire for her truth and honesty and I won't respond any further to Idstlou's posts.
How could Idstlou make up for what she caused?
She can't.
I'll forgive her,  eventually.

POOP SUITS MAY BE REMOVED

back to the pond.
ribbit





Thank you, Kermit.  I think you are fine and brave.
I am so sorry that you have had to endure all of the
slings and arrows hurled at you.
idstlou can protest till the cows come home, but I have
lost all respect for her.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #797 1/30/09 -
Post by: Edward on January 31, 2009, 03:12:35 PM
ot

http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2009/01/31/obamas-half-brother-arrested-drug-charges-kenya/

George Obama, the half brother of U.S. President Barack Obama, has been arrested by Kenyan police on a charge of possession of marijuana, police said Saturday.


a lost america..mo.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #797 1/30/09 -
Post by: texasmom on January 31, 2009, 03:14:10 PM
http://www.amigoe.com/artman/publish/printer_52208.php

Google translation:

Aruba
 
Chinese takeover Valero promising


31 Jan, 2009, 14:06 (GMT -04:00)

ORANGE CITY - The odds that China takes over the Valero refinery, is not unlikely, as late as Henri Coffie, former manager of the refinery in San Nicolas know. China, according to him negotiate with Venezuela over the supply of crude oil.
In November, this newspaper has reported on a visit to China Petro Valero after a takeover by Brazil's Petrobras failed. Coffie said in an interview for the World that he has read that the Chinese want to close deals for Venezuelan oil: "It would be an ideal situation if the Chinese would deliver oil to our refinery." The reason why the Chinese would want is for him not entirely clear. "They have the same refineries."
 
Clearly it is the former manager for the Valero refinery in hand to do. "Not so long ago was told that 6 billion dollars is needed for the refinery to restore and investments to make better, more marketable products on the market. Without a partner, there will be no investment and it is viewed. "
According Coffie Venezuela probably has no interest in the refinery: "They have the opportunity for her to take over in 1985 when Lake was close."




Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #797 1/30/09 -
Post by: klaasend on January 31, 2009, 03:17:28 PM
REMINDER - Whether we agree or disagree with LDSTLOU's opinion regarding Kyle and Kermit, LDSTLOU is spending her day today at the travel show in St. Louis reminding people that Aruba is not a safe destination  


Something HotShots and ******* have both participated in as well. 

I don't see this as some sort of license to attack other posters, however.



Anna  - I agree.  I just wanted to remind people in case they didn't know.  I feel she's being misguided.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #797 1/30/09 -
Post by: Anna on January 31, 2009, 03:18:49 PM
Ree,

Believe me, you do not want any personal information revealed at all to anybody as you will surely come to regret it.  I learned this the hard way and some will recall that I have been attacked as well as Kermit recently by these drivebys.  And they think nothing of lying about you.  Nothing is off limits to them either.

It has been like watching people lose their minds slowly over time.  Real Twilight Zone territory but you are wise and correct not to reveal any personal information especially in this climate of hate and malice toward monkeys.  Some people have real issues.

Anna


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #797 1/30/09 -
Post by: Tamikosmom on January 31, 2009, 03:19:19 PM
OK this will be one of those so called drive by post. I have been a member of Scared Monkeys since a very few days after Natalee went missing. I have met on here many nice folks that I probably would like in real life. IDSTLOU is one of those. She has been very dedicated to the cause of Natalee. Just as many of you have.

I do not have the post count so many of you have and actually quit reading much here when all the changes took place with the pop ups and flashing light ads. I never gave up on Natalee. After I downloaded adblock I was again able to read here without getting so frustrated from those.One day I had 26 pop ups in a 45 minute period. Some folks never had that problem. Ok that explains my low post count and my semi desertion from Scared Monkeys.

It really bothers me that so many of our good researchers and dedicated Monkeys have left us.My own personal opinion is this has been caused by what I see happening in the way IDSTLOU has been treated lately. She is not a troll or a Johnny come lately.  She is entitled to her opinion the same as you are. I thought we were supposed to attack the post and not the poster. If we can't do that we can use our scroll button .

Of course it is nice to see Scared Monkeys continue to grow with new posters. I just do not think it means we continue to attack the long time members to where they feel it necessary to leave us. JMHO

Sam 


Sam ... without backup to the contrary ... Lou has without mercy undermine Kermit's integrity  in regards to the posts which expose the John Silvetti betrayal of Natalee Holloway's family.

I am rejoicing that this travesty which abetted the enemy in the finale to the great Aruban coverup was revealed.  However ... I am angry that this travesty took place.  I am angry at John Silvetti.

Lou is far from rejoicing that Kermit exposed this travesty again Natalee Holloway's family and ... she continues to uphold John Silvetti.

I just do not get it.  I do not think for one minute Lou would be taking a position that supported John Silvetti if it there had been a possibility that her loved one had been place in that trap/cage.

Sincerely, Janet

I swear Janet you have an amazing gift that you give to the world.
You should be writing/authoring books, articles for a major newspaper or something.
Very talented. Tell Mr. Veggie hello from kermit.


Thanks Kermit.

I do have a passion for writing but ... it is confined for the most part to the Natalee Holloway case and ... eight journals that synopsis moments in the lives of my three grown kids and ... my five grandkids ... from my perspective.

After I am pushing up daisies ... what each member of my family does with their respective journal is entirely up to them.

Veggie says "Hi".  Veggie also says "Janet, get off that darn computer".

Later, Janet
11:55 AM PT

Janet


I wanted to add.  Eldest son's journal could make a best seller.  It is a very interesting/exciting read.  This guy is the only one of our three kids who humbled us and ... did he ever humble us!

 ::MonkeyHaHa::

Janet


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #797 1/30/09 -
Post by: Anna on January 31, 2009, 03:22:20 PM
http://www.amigoe.com/artman/publish/printer_52208.php

Google translation:

Aruba
 
Chinese takeover Valero promising


31 Jan, 2009, 14:06 (GMT -04:00)

ORANGE CITY - The odds that China takes over the Valero refinery, is not unlikely, as late as Henri Coffie, former manager of the refinery in San Nicolas know. China, according to him negotiate with Venezuela over the supply of crude oil.
In November, this newspaper has reported on a visit to China Petro Valero after a takeover by Brazil's Petrobras failed. Coffie said in an interview for the World that he has read that the Chinese want to close deals for Venezuelan oil: "It would be an ideal situation if the Chinese would deliver oil to our refinery." The reason why the Chinese would want is for him not entirely clear. "They have the same refineries."
 
Clearly it is the former manager for the Valero refinery in hand to do. "Not so long ago was told that 6 billion dollars is needed for the refinery to restore and investments to make better, more marketable products on the market. Without a partner, there will be no investment and it is viewed. "
According Coffie Venezuela probably has no interest in the refinery: "They have the opportunity for her to take over in 1985 when Lake was close."





Well, this is interesting.  So we already have the Russians offering Chavez nuclear technology and drilling off the coast of Venezuela so let's add the Communist Chinese to the mix?

 ::MonkeyShocked::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #797 1/30/09 -
Post by: A's Fever on January 31, 2009, 03:22:24 PM
Not sure why signing in vs. reading as a guest has become important, however, I guess I will sign in when reading now.  I ususally don't unless I post, which I rarely do.  But since I am signed in, I might as well post!

I have been catching up after not reading at this thread for a long time, and am shocked at all that has gone on.  While it is probably best not to be too invested in any one idea or theory, because that might obscure one's objectivity if other evidence comes along, it would certainly be hard not to recognize Kyle's betrayal of Natalee's family as shown in numerous recent posts.

Kudos and a hat tip to Janet for her amazing research, archival and logic skills in helping to bring this deception to light.  I, for one, find this turn of events shocking and distrubing after falling for the hope and inspiration that the Persistance brought.  Is there no end to the evil plot twists and turns that emerge from that hellhole of an island??

I continue to stand with the girl, and with any human or amphibian who works for justice on her behalf.  You monkeys are an amazing group of people (primates?).





Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #797 1/30/09 -
Post by: Edward on January 31, 2009, 03:24:57 PM
I have always believed the ocean floor was being mapped for future oil drilling.
Natalee was one of there agendas.. But I doubt that was the main reason Persistence was brought to Aruba.
It was a very kind and considerate thing to do as they were there already and it was a good smoke screen to calm protests from Hugo-Chavez in Venezuela.
 What or Who Kermit is or is not has never been one of my considerations..
I would rather know WHO Marcos is..
jmho


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #797 1/30/09 -
Post by: texasmom on January 31, 2009, 03:32:26 PM
OT

::MonkeyNoNo::  I'm actually surprised this offender received any time at all...but it's not enough.  The little I've been able to understand in following this case has been very upsetting.  These children needed someone on their side.  jmo

http://www.amigoe.com/artman/publish/printer_52207.php

Aruba

Singer sentenced for child abuse

31 Jan, 2009, 14:06 (GMT -04:00)

ORANGE CITY - The suspected child singer G. was yesterday sentenced to an imprisonment of 365 days with 344 days and 240 hours service contingent with a probationary period of two years. This is significantly lower than the Public Prosecutor (OM) had demanded.
 
The man has two children aged eleven and thirteen years of abuse. This happened over a period of two years (2005-2007). The OM had an unconditional prison sentence of 18 months required. The court found evidence that G. abuse has the confidence of the children. He had secured his children should offer, said the court, but instead he violated the trust and immoral acts committed by them. That they remain with them and will have a lasting impact on the rest of their lives, was the conclusion of the court.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #797 1/30/09 -
Post by: iris44 on January 31, 2009, 03:34:07 PM

http://www.thefacts.com/story.lasso?ewcd=054bac688bc7c40c

Captain Elliott’s sells fishing operations

By Hunter Sauls
The Facts   

Published January 4, 2008

FREEPORT — As longtime owners of the charter fishing tour boats of Captain Elliott’s Party Boats pull out of the recreational fishing business — the new owner, Underwater Expeditions, is baiting their hooks.

Last January, the owners of Captain Elliott’s said they would be closing shop due to lack of profit and increased restrictions on red snapper fishing, their main attraction.

Since then, Kemah resident Louis Schaefer, chairman of Superior Offshore International Inc., a worldwide commercial diving company, has bought the two boats and is expected to close on a deal to buy the docks and buildings next month, said Casey Cundieff, vice president of Captain Elliott’s.

The first trip is scheduled for Jan. 18. They’ll be taking out the “Big E”, which can carry 105 people, on a 52-hour tour out for yellow and black fin tuna, said ship captain and Freeport resident Robert Poulsen.

“It’s going to be a lot of fun,” Poulsen said.
---
Casting a wide net

“We want to build recreational fishing as a major industry here in Freeport,” said Evonn Caraway, Underwater Expeditions office manager. While Captain Elliott’s dedicated their boats to fishing tours, Caraway said they are going to tailor their cruises to what their clients have in mind.

“We’ll be doing spear fishing, scuba diving, kayak shuttling and our main focus — offshore fishing,” Caraway said. “We’re not worried about the red snapper limits. So far, we’ve had no problems filling our books up.”

Not only will Underwater Expeditions be using the same boats and facilities as Captain Elliott’s, but they already have added another to the fleet, a 32-foot catamaran, and plan to add more, she said.

“We have the same captains, deckhands and everything, just new owners and new management,” she said.

They also held onto L.A. Cuban, the walking Rolodex of Captain Elliott’s. She has worked every position in the company since her first day in 1988.

“I know all the regular customers,” Cuban said with a smile.

The four-fish limit on red snapper per person, a federal regulation, is not a major concern for Underwater Expeditions, she said. Only a few of the dozens of clients who have called or made reservations have even mentioned the fish, Caraway said.

“To me grouper is better meat than snapper anyway, it’s lighter and less gamey,” Caraway said as she stood out on the docks near the 87-foot “Capt. Casey”, their older fishing boat, and the 133-foot “Big E”, the longer, sleeker 2005-model vessel. “Most people come out to fish whatever is in season.”
---
‘X’ marks the spot

Schaefer is not stopping there. He has also purchased the Bed and Breakfast next door to the docks, and the purchase of a new “expedition” ship is in the works, said Underwater Expeditions operations manager Jamie Stovall.

“If we’re going to do this, we’re going to do it right,” Stovall said. “We’re really excited about this acquisition.”

Until Underwater Expeditions can get a hold of their own boat, Schaefer is financing expeditions on other boats. One such expedition is currently out in Caribbean waters off Aruba looking for the remains of Natalee Holloway, an Alabama high school senior whose 2005 disappearance became a media sensation.

“We are also going to explore some sunken shipwrecks — for treasure,” Stovall said.

These expeditions are an interesting part of this investment, but not very profitable, Stovall said. The charter tour operations should make Underwater Expeditions break even, at least, he said.

“Louis believes that having fun in work is bigger and better than money,” Stovall said. “This isn’t a have-to business.”
---
Sailing to fairer seas

Even though the Big E and Capt. Casey have been sold to Schaefer, Captain Elliott’s Party Boats lives on as the parent company of Texas Crew Boats, Cundieff said. His father, Elliott Cundieff, started Captain Elliott’s in Freeport more than 30 years ago.

“As far as getting back in the fishing business, it doesn’t look like that will happen anytime soon,” Cundieff said.

In the meantime, the Cundieff family will be busy in their more profitable venture, Texas Crew Boats. The company’s seven, soon to be nine, $2 to $5 million boats ferry passengers, supplies, water, fuel and groceries out to offshore oil field workers, Cundieff said.

“The beauty part of the operation is they pay for the fuel and oil of our boats for each day we work,” he said. “So long as the jobs are steady, things are going well.”

Cundieff said he was relieved when Schaefer bought the recreational fishing boats. He didn’t see any profit in it.

“It was no secret that it wasn’t going well. Maybe he thinks he can do different stuff with it and make money,” he said. “The recreational fishing business is just too seasonal — I think we got lucky someone was willing to buy. I hope they’re able to maintain it.”


Until a deal is done on the docks, Cundieff said he would tie his personal fishing boat there. Afterward, he said he assumes he’ll be paying Underwater Expeditions monthly rent to leave his boat at the dock his family has owned for three decades.

“That’s going to feel a little strange,” he said.

Hunter Sauls covers Freeport for The Facts. Contact him at (979) 237-0153.

Very interesting isn't it Lifesong?As his former company,which he bailed on after selling off all his stocks is going bankrupt,Schaefer is out buying up other companies and spending millions on a search for Natalee Holloway!Now it doesn't take to much LOGIC in my book to see something is definitely wrong with this picture!

KEEPTHEFAITH

Has this link between Schaefer and Captain Elliott been discussed here before?  Wouldn't it be possible that Captain Elliott or one of his employees is CAPS?  That would explain CAPS connection to Schaeffer and how he would know the dive site for the trap.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #797 1/30/09 -
Post by: Anna on January 31, 2009, 03:38:08 PM
People are not all good/all bad but a mixture of these two things.  There are varying degrees of each in all of us.  This is what makes us human beings.

I have no problem with duel purposes in any search and do appreciate the effort of those who made it.  They did not have to even put forth any effort.

However, it is the total disregard of advice and information and warnings about the history of ALE and evidence that is heartbreaking. 

Private Eye said it best.  The effort was supurb but the game was rigged. 

It is the not ever knowing if there were human remains or not as we were told there were and to whom they belonged that created the controversy.

Now just how we get around that I can't imagine.  I guess I am stuck on stupid or something but I tend toward Natalee still being on land.  I know that doesn't make any sense with a whole ocean available but is just my gut feeling.  I still want to dig up the Sloot concrete and check the cess pool as well.

But I do remain open to information and don't have a really hard, fast theory even after all this time.  Still just wanting to know what happened to Natalee and see some resolution toward justice.  I used to be able to say just give her back but too much ill will has developed over the years and now I want somebody to pay for whatever they did to her.



Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #797 1/30/09 -
Post by: texasmom on January 31, 2009, 03:39:09 PM
Not sure why signing in vs. reading as a guest has become important, however, I guess I will sign in when reading now.  I ususally don't unless I post, which I rarely do.  But since I am signed in, I might as well post!

I have been catching up after not reading at this thread for a long time, and am shocked at all that has gone on.  While it is probably best not to be too invested in any one idea or theory, because that might obscure one's objectivity if other evidence comes along, it would certainly be hard not to recognize Kyle's betrayal of Natalee's family as shown in numerous recent posts.

Kudos and a hat tip to Janet for her amazing research, archival and logic skills in helping to bring this deception to light.  I, for one, find this turn of events shocking and distrubing after falling for the hope and inspiration that the Persistance brought.  Is there no end to the evil plot twists and turns that emerge from that hellhole of an island??

I continue to stand with the girl, and with any human or amphibian who works for justice on her behalf.  You monkeys are an amazing group of people (primates?).


Good to see you A's!  Thanks for posting!   ::MonkeyCool::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #797 1/30/09 -
Post by: Anna on January 31, 2009, 03:42:26 PM
Good to see you, A's.

And love your avatar but then I am a dog person for sure.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #797 1/30/09 -
Post by: iris44 on January 31, 2009, 03:42:27 PM
http://www.iberianet.com/articles/2007/11/29/news/news/news00.txt

See the above link for an old news article with a lot of detail of who contacted who regarding the Persistence search.  I wasn't sure if it had already been posted here.  The article says TES contacted Schaefer and Schaefer contacted Silvetti.






Natalee Holloway: Tim Miller of Texas EquuSearch Discusses Crab Trap, Clothing and DNA Found in Waters of Aruba
February 27, 2005 2008


"I've been trying to put this together for two and a half years...Louis Schaefer came forward with John Silvetti."
(transcript credit: texasmom)

Video:
http://scaredmonkeys.com/2008/02/27/natalee-holloway-tim-miller-of-texas-equusearch-discusses-crab-trap-clothing-and-dna-found-in-waters-of-aruba/


Once again -- bless you and your superior organization skills, Janet.  :smt052

That poster would have actually had to READ here to have known that has been posted several times already.

Not a common characteristic for 'drive by's' intended to disrupt

 :smt075



You're mean.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #797 1/30/09 -
Post by: wreck on January 31, 2009, 03:43:31 PM
So are Kyle and Caps (whom Kyle once described as "one step away from Dirty Hand) buddies now?


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #797 1/30/09 -
Post by: iris44 on January 31, 2009, 03:44:34 PM
People are not all good/all bad but a mixture of these two things.  There are varying degrees of each in all of us.  This is what makes us human beings.

I have no problem with duel purposes in any search and do appreciate the effort of those who made it.  They did not have to even put forth any effort.

However, it is the total disregard of advice and information and warnings about the history of ALE and evidence that is heartbreaking. 

Private Eye said it best.  The effort was supurb but the game was rigged. 

It is the not ever knowing if there were human remains or not as we were told there were and to whom they belonged that created the controversy.

Now just how we get around that I can't imagine.  I guess I am stuck on stupid or something but I tend toward Natalee still being on land.  I know that doesn't make any sense with a whole ocean available but is just my gut feeling.  I still want to dig up the Sloot concrete and check the cess pool as well.

But I do remain open to information and don't have a really hard, fast theory even after all this time.  Still just wanting to know what happened to Natalee and see some resolution toward justice.  I used to be able to say just give her back but too much ill will has developed over the years and now I want somebody to pay for whatever they did to her.



I tend to think she is on land, too, because Joran seems certain she won't be found.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #797 1/30/09 -
Post by: wreck on January 31, 2009, 03:46:40 PM
People are not all good/all bad but a mixture of these two things.  There are varying degrees of each in all of us.  This is what makes us human beings.

I have no problem with duel purposes in any search and do appreciate the effort of those who made it.  They did not have to even put forth any effort.

However, it is the total disregard of advice and information and warnings about the history of ALE and evidence that is heartbreaking. 

Private Eye said it best.  The effort was supurb but the game was rigged. 

It is the not ever knowing if there were human remains or not as we were told there were and to whom they belonged that created the controversy.

Now just how we get around that I can't imagine.  I guess I am stuck on stupid or something but I tend toward Natalee still being on land.  I know that doesn't make any sense with a whole ocean available but is just my gut feeling.  I still want to dig up the Sloot concrete and check the cess pool as well.

But I do remain open to information and don't have a really hard, fast theory even after all this time.  Still just wanting to know what happened to Natalee and see some resolution toward justice.  I used to be able to say just give her back but too much ill will has developed over the years and now I want somebody to pay for whatever they did to her.



I tend to think she is on land, too, because Joran seems certain she won't be found.
Which is why I think she is in the sea.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #797 1/30/09 -
Post by: Tamikosmom on January 31, 2009, 03:49:04 PM
Idstlou said: "If I am wrong, I apologize, because then indeed I have been mislead by those trying to discredit you. "


KERMIT

"You are wrong. And you caused me grievous harm. I hope you are happy."



 ::MonkeyNoNo::  Off to the gym to digest why someone would harm the Frog!Why would that be and for what reason?

God Bless

KEEPTHEFAITH

Try not to let the hurt get you down Kermit.  Stay focus on your 3 1/2 year passion to expose the corrupt Aruban investigation that has prevented justice from prevailing for an 18 year old American citizen.  That focus must include those who are abetting thsy corrupt Aruban investigation.

Hugs

Janet



Galatians 6:9 (New Living Translation)
9 So let’s not get tired of doing what is good. At just the right time we will reap a harvest of blessing if we don’t give up.



Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #797 1/30/09 -
Post by: texasmom on January 31, 2009, 03:50:04 PM
Idstlou said: "If I am wrong, I apologize, because then indeed I have been mislead by those trying to discredit you. "


KERMIT

"You are wrong. And you caused me grievous harm. I hope you are happy."



 ::MonkeyNoNo::  Off to the gym to digest why someone would harm the Frog!Why would that be and for what reason?

God Bless

KEEPTHEFAITH

Try not to let the hurt get you down Kermit.  Stay focus on your 3 1/2 year passion to expose the corrupt Aruban investigation that has prevented justice from prevailing for an 18 year old American citizen.  That focus must include those who are abetting thsy corrupt Aruban investigation.

Hugs

Janet



Galatians 6:9 (New Living Translation)
9 So let’s not get tired of doing what is good. At just the right time we will reap a harvest of blessing if we don’t give up.



AMEN.  Thank you Janet!   ::MonkeyCool::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #797 1/30/09 -
Post by: Anna on January 31, 2009, 03:50:23 PM
Wreck, I can understand fully why you would think that, too.  Maybe she started out on land and was finally put into the ocean?

I don't know and it is strictly a feeling and nothing logical that causes me to think she is still on land somewhere.

That's why I have never been able to forumlate a real theory as to what I think happened.  I can see too many possibilities.



Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #797 1/30/09 -
Post by: wreck on January 31, 2009, 03:53:00 PM
Wreck, I can understand fully why you would think that, too.  Maybe she started out on land and was finally put into the ocean?

I don't know and it is strictly a feeling and nothing logical that causes me to think she is still on land somewhere.

That's why I have never been able to forumlate a real theory as to what I think happened.  I can see too many possibilities.


I never thought she was put in the ocean that first night. I think she was moved on a land at least a few times.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #797 1/30/09 -
Post by: A's Fever on January 31, 2009, 03:54:21 PM
Good to see you, A's.

And love your avatar but then I am a dog person for sure.

Hi Anna and Texas Mom!

Anna I didn't even know I liked dogs very much until we got our lab puppy a year ago, but what a delight she is!  I am so glad we have a pooch now to complete our family!



Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #797 1/30/09 -
Post by: iris44 on January 31, 2009, 03:59:39 PM
Has anyone heard of or done any research on Casey Cundieff (or his dad) from Captain Elliott's?  Has it already been discussed here that Schaeffer had purchased Aruban businesses? 


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #797 1/30/09 -
Post by: 2NJSons_Mom on January 31, 2009, 04:02:04 PM
Wreck, I can understand fully why you would think that, too.  Maybe she started out on land and was finally put into the ocean?

I don't know and it is strictly a feeling and nothing logical that causes me to think she is still on land somewhere.

That's why I have never been able to forumlate a real theory as to what I think happened.  I can see too many possibilities.


I never thought she was put in the ocean that first night. I think she was moved on a land at least a few times.

I lean toward this, too, but am hesitant to say I'm positive about it.  The men here in my family all believed she was in the sea very quickly. 


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #797 1/30/09 -
Post by: Ree on January 31, 2009, 04:03:15 PM
Good to see you, A's.

And love your avatar but then I am a dog person for sure.

Hi Anna and Texas Mom!

Anna I didn't even know I liked dogs very much until we got our lab puppy a year ago, but what a delight she is!  I am so glad we have a pooch now to complete our family!



My daughter has a choclate lab.  He's kinda like a mini-horse, but lovable as can be.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #797 1/30/09 -
Post by: Tamikosmom on January 31, 2009, 04:07:30 PM


I tend to think she is on land, too, because Joran seems certain she won't be found.

Prior to the Persistence undertaking ... I too felt that Natalee Holloway's remains were on land or ... had been taken out to sea on the side of the island.  Hey ... I posted Kyle Kingman my theory.

However ... following the revelation of Kyle's own words ... I cannot get past the cage/trap.  Think about it.  I am a believer in Kyle's own words.  In his resume Kyle claims that his field of expertise encompassed analysing ROV images and ... he also implies a John Silvetti conflict of interest that was an utter betrayal to the cause of justice for Natalee Holloway ... an utter betrayal to the cause of closure for her family.

Janet

_____

oceanexploration ... when the observation of the landfill witness is taken into consideration ... is it possible ... if Natalee Holloway was taken out to sea ... the area could have been the east side of the Island and ... not on the morning or evening of the day she went missing?

May God bless the efforts of all those on the Persistence.

Janet

+++++++++++++++++++

ON THE MORNING OF MAY 30, 2005 ... A DECEASED NATALEE IS PLACED IN A WHITE PICKUP.

Jossy Mansur
NANCY GRACE
July 29, 2005


GRACE: OK. Jossy, is there any way to tie in a white pick-up to this scenario?
 
MANSUR: Yes, ma`am, because there`s another witness that, before that, told someone that works at the hotels that he saw a white pick-up over there by the Holiday Inn, in which three persons were also in, all of them male, carrying what looked like the body of a girl, putting it in the back of the white pick-up and driving away with it.
http://transcripts.cnn.com/TRANSCRIPTS/0507/29/ng.01.html


ON THE MORNING OF MAY 30, 2005 ... THERE IS A RUMORED 6:30 AM CALL FROM ONE OF THE SUSPECTS CELL IN THE SANTA LUCIA AREA OF THE ISLAND AND ... JORAN IS ALLEGEDLY PICKED UP BY THE SCHOOL BUS NEAR THE HOME OF LORENZO VAN RIJN.

Thursday, June 16, 2005 at 04:53 AM in Natalee Holloway | Permalink | Comments (270) | TrackBack (2)

On Natalee's Yahoo forum there there is a report that a helicopter is searching Santa Lucia area because according to the cell phone records of one of the three suspects there was a call in the Santa Lucia area at 6:30 am the morning Natalee was to have met up with the group to leave for airport.
http://www.riehlworldview.com/carnivorous_conservative/2005/week24/


Greta Van Susteren
On the Record w/ Greta
July 3, 2005

 
SUSTEREN: .... I am also curious whether Paul van der Sloot used his phone between midnight and 7 a.m. on May 30. He told me no... he told the Dutch TV correspondent on camera no... but after the interview with the Dutch TV correspondent, he pulled him aside and said maybe he did make a call and that he was not sure.
http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,161474,00.html


Dave Holloway
Question and Answer Chat - BFN
January 23, 2006


14. Why was the school bus driver called the next morning and told to pick up Joran at Lorenzo's house?
 
DAVE: Joran was allegedly dropped off at a bus stop on the main highway. The bus driver had not made it there yet and saved Paulus about 30 minutes. Lorenzo's house was nearby.
http://blogsfornatalee.com/forum/index.php?topic=2256.0


ON JUNE 1, 2005 ... NATALEE'S REMAINS ARE OBSERVED BY JUNIOR BEING TAKEN FROM A WHITE PICKUP AND PLACED IN THE LANDFILL.

Jossy Mansur
NANCY GRACE
July 29, 2005


MANSUR: … But it`s very important to note that the witness on the beach by the Holiday Inn has absolutely no knowledge of the witness over there to the east side of the island by the landfill or dump. They don't know each other, but still they give the same description of the same white pick-up.
http://transcripts.cnn.com/TRANSCRIPTS/0507/29/ng.01.html


Susan Candiotti - Cnn Correspondent
NANCY GRACE
July 29, 2005

 
CANDIOTTI:his same witness claims to have told police that he saw a vehicle and was able to provide a tag number to police. I am told that this is a registered car in Aruba, but I can`t tell you more than that.
 

JUNIOR CONVEYS HIS OBSERVATION TO HIS BROTHER WHO ... ON JUNE 3, 2005 ... CONVEYS THE ACCOUNT TO THE ARUBAN AUTHORITIES.

Tim Miller
CBS NEWS
July 30, 2005


The witness told his brother what he saw soon afterward, and the brother told police, he said.
http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2005/07/31/world/main712950.shtml?source=search_story


Edwin Comenencia
Associated Press
August 1, 2005


Police spokesman Edwin Comenencia said police searched the landfill after receiving the tip days after Holloway's disappearance May 30th, but found nothing.
http://www.wtvynews4.com/home/headlines/1756907.html


COULD JUNIOR'S OBSERVATION IMPLIES THAT THE "POWERS THAT BE" IN THE COVERUP REMOVED NATALEE'S REMAINS FROM THE LANDFILL AND ... SHE WAS BURIED OR ... TAKEN OUT TO SEA OR ... BOTH.

Tim Miller
RED - SCARED MONKEYS
July 24, 2005


RED:  There have been reports that a shallow grave was discovered in the area of Boca Tortuga, on the eastern part of the island. There are also reports that cell-phone calls made by Joran earlyin the morning came from a location on the eastern side of the island. It seems plausible that thisarea could yield more clues

TIM MILLER:  We found a site that we feel as though was a possible gravesite. Our thoughts are that Natalee may have been buried in that hole for 1 or 2 days then moved. We have information that the cell phones were possibly being used in that area
http://scaredmonkeys.com/2005/07/24/interview-transcript-with-tim-miller-july-24th-2005/


Dave Holloway
NANCY GRACE
April 24, 2006


GRACE: Well, Dave Holloway, aren`t there logs and isn`t there surveillance in place in Aruba of all the ships that go out of the tiny island, even at night?

HOLLOWAY: Well, there is but on one of those nights, I think it was June the 7th or June the 8th, the electricity went out on the island for about two hours so you wonder if that would have been the prime opportunity to do it. Small boats, I don`t think, can be picked up as well as the big ones.
http://transcripts.cnn.com/TRANSCRIPTS/0604/24/ng.01.html


http://www.scaredmonkeys.com/2006/06/18/what-did-the-aruba-park-ranger-pick-up-at-boca-tortuga-area-fabric-that-matched-natalees-top/

What did the Aruba Park Ranger pick up at Boca Tortuga area? Fabric that matched Natalee’s Top?
 
What ever happened to this material? Why didn’t the media camera man take a close up of what so closely resembled the green fabric of Natalee’s top? One would have thought that they would have zoomed right in to see what had been collected.

On Sunday, July 17, 2005 the park rangers found the duct tape with long blonde hair in the Boca Tortuga area of Aruba. A park ranger being video’d walking around picks up a piece of fabric that matches Natalee’s top.

The question still remains today, what ever happened to this evidence that was collected? We also need to remember that this material that was found washed ashore following the hurricanes that took place last summer. It is highly possibly that the material washed ashore from another location on the island or from out at sea.

+++++++++++

View images at:
http://www.scaredmonkeys.com/2006/06/18/what-did-the-aruba-park-ranger-pick-up-at-boca-tortuga-area-fabric-that-matched-natalees-top/






Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #797 1/30/09 -
Post by: wreck on January 31, 2009, 04:08:19 PM
Has anyone heard of or done any research on Casey Cundieff (or his dad) from Captain Elliott's?  Has it already been discussed here that Schaeffer had purchased Aruban businesses? 
Can you fill us in? I think you have told us that you have some personal knowledge of John and/or Louis. I would be interested in pursuing ANY angle you might feel relevant.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #797 1/30/09 -
Post by: 2NJSons_Mom on January 31, 2009, 04:08:20 PM
Has anyone heard of or done any research on Casey Cundieff (or his dad) from Captain Elliott's?  Has it already been discussed here that Schaeffer had purchased Aruban businesses? 


I do not recall.  Do you have some info to share?   The aruban business purchases is intriguing.

********

Hi, A's Fever.  Good to see you.   If you are not logged in, we will now know you may be one of our visitors!       ::MonkeyWink::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #797 1/30/09 -
Post by: A's Fever on January 31, 2009, 04:14:27 PM
Has anyone heard of or done any research on Casey Cundieff (or his dad) from Captain Elliott's?  Has it already been discussed here that Schaeffer had purchased Aruban businesses? 


I do not recall.  Do you have some info to share?   The aruban business purchases is intriguing.

********

Hi, A's Fever.  Good to see you.   If you are not logged in, we will now know you may be one of our visitors!       ::MonkeyWink::

Hi 2NJ!  I see you are still at your ironing!


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #797 1/30/09 -
Post by: Tamikosmom on January 31, 2009, 04:15:03 PM
http://www.iberianet.com/articles/2007/11/29/news/news/news00.txt

See the above link for an old news article with a lot of detail of who contacted who regarding the Persistence search.  I wasn't sure if it had already been posted here.  The article says TES contacted Schaefer and Schaefer contacted Silvetti.






Natalee Holloway: Tim Miller of Texas EquuSearch Discusses Crab Trap, Clothing and DNA Found in Waters of Aruba
February 27, 2005 2008


"I've been trying to put this together for two and a half years...Louis Schaefer came forward with John Silvetti."
(transcript credit: texasmom)

Video:
http://scaredmonkeys.com/2008/02/27/natalee-holloway-tim-miller-of-texas-equusearch-discusses-crab-trap-clothing-and-dna-found-in-waters-of-aruba/


Once again -- bless you and your superior organization skills, Janet.  :smt052

That poster would have actually had to READ here to have known that has been posted several times already.

Not a common characteristic for 'drive by's' intended to disrupt

 :smt075



You're mean.

Sharon???  Mean???

 ::MonkeyNoNo::

Janet


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #797 1/30/09 -
Post by: 2NJSons_Mom on January 31, 2009, 04:17:50 PM
http://www.iberianet.com/articles/2007/11/29/news/news/news00.txt

See the above link for an old news article with a lot of detail of who contacted who regarding the Persistence search.  I wasn't sure if it had already been posted here.  The article says TES contacted Schaefer and Schaefer contacted Silvetti.






Natalee Holloway: Tim Miller of Texas EquuSearch Discusses Crab Trap, Clothing and DNA Found in Waters of Aruba
February 27, 2005 2008


"I've been trying to put this together for two and a half years...Louis Schaefer came forward with John Silvetti."
(transcript credit: texasmom)

Video:
http://scaredmonkeys.com/2008/02/27/natalee-holloway-tim-miller-of-texas-equusearch-discusses-crab-trap-clothing-and-dna-found-in-waters-of-aruba/


Once again -- bless you and your superior organization skills, Janet.  :smt052

That poster would have actually had to READ here to have known that has been posted several times already.

Not a common characteristic for 'drive by's' intended to disrupt

 :smt075



You're mean.

Sharon???  Mean???

 ::MonkeyNoNo::

Janet

 ::MonkeyRoll::   Hardly....that's why I skipped that post.  To each his own.

Where'd Iris44 go?


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #797 1/30/09 -
Post by: texasmom on January 31, 2009, 04:18:33 PM
http://www.iberianet.com/articles/2007/11/29/news/news/news00.txt

See the above link for an old news article with a lot of detail of who contacted who regarding the Persistence search.  I wasn't sure if it had already been posted here.  The article says TES contacted Schaefer and Schaefer contacted Silvetti.




Natalee Holloway: Tim Miller of Texas EquuSearch Discusses Crab Trap, Clothing and DNA Found in Waters of Aruba
February 27, 2005 2008


"I've been trying to put this together for two and a half years...Louis Schaefer came forward with John Silvetti."
(transcript credit: texasmom)

Video:
http://scaredmonkeys.com/2008/02/27/natalee-holloway-tim-miller-of-texas-equusearch-discusses-crab-trap-clothing-and-dna-found-in-waters-of-aruba/


Once again -- bless you and your superior organization skills, Janet.  :smt052

That poster would have actually had to READ here to have known that has been posted several times already.

Not a common characteristic for 'drive by's' intended to disrupt

 :smt075



You're mean.

Sharon???  Mean???  

 ::MonkeyNoNo::

Janet

Of course not.   ::MonkeyNoNo::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #797 1/30/09 -
Post by: Puzzler on January 31, 2009, 04:28:31 PM
I really think the best thing to do is ignore ldstlou.
I know it is hard to ignore the nasty things she says,
But the CnG people have sent her here with an agenda
to disrupt.  She doesn't comprehend what any of us
have to reply.  Maybe she isn't capable of comprehending.
Let her do her drive by and just pretend it isn't happening.

Once again you are right.  It is time to drop the subject.  None of us are going to change our opinions on what we think is the truth.

I look at it this way, she thinks that she is right and I know I am right.  ::MonkeyWink::


Good Afternoon, Monkeys!

Agree!  She either refuses to read what is posted in response to her or can't comprehend what she is reading but it is infuriating to watch somebody twist what was posted in the first place as she does.

But is big waste of time and totally futile.

Why should we care if she believes or doesn't what Kermit posts?  How did everything become about convincing people of something they are determined not to be convinced about?  Few of us agree on every aspect of this tragedy and yet we manage to post without constantly trying to start fights with those we don't agree with.

Scrolling, scrolling, scrolling is where it's at. . . . .



Simple:  If she's sent here with an agenda - then she doesn't want to comprehend (that would defeat her goal).

By everyone giving her so much attention, it only helps her reach her goal (if she has one).

IMO





Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #797 1/30/09 -
Post by: iris44 on January 31, 2009, 04:30:14 PM
http://www.iberianet.com/articles/2007/11/29/news/news/news00.txt

See the above link for an old news article with a lot of detail of who contacted who regarding the Persistence search.  I wasn't sure if it had already been posted here.  The article says TES contacted Schaefer and Schaefer contacted Silvetti.






Natalee Holloway: Tim Miller of Texas EquuSearch Discusses Crab Trap, Clothing and DNA Found in Waters of Aruba
February 27, 2005 2008


"I've been trying to put this together for two and a half years...Louis Schaefer came forward with John Silvetti."
(transcript credit: texasmom)

Video:
http://scaredmonkeys.com/2008/02/27/natalee-holloway-tim-miller-of-texas-equusearch-discusses-crab-trap-clothing-and-dna-found-in-waters-of-aruba/


Once again -- bless you and your superior organization skills, Janet.  :smt052

That poster would have actually had to READ here to have known that has been posted several times already.

Not a common characteristic for 'drive by's' intended to disrupt

 :smt075



You're mean.

Sharon???  Mean???

 ::MonkeyNoNo::

Janet

 ::MonkeyRoll::   Hardly....that's why I skipped that post.  To each his own.

Where'd Iris44 go?

See the bold section above.  Was that nice to me?  Should I be attacked for researching articles?  Can't everyone stop snipping at each other?


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #797 1/30/09 -
Post by: iris44 on January 31, 2009, 04:35:40 PM
Has anyone heard of or done any research on Casey Cundieff (or his dad) from Captain Elliott's?  Has it already been discussed here that Schaeffer had purchased Aruban businesses? 
Can you fill us in? I think you have told us that you have some personal knowledge of John and/or Louis. I would be interested in pursuing ANY angle you might feel relevant.

I have no personal knowledge of anyone at SM or the Persistence or the family.  I read the article that lifesong brought forward a few pages back.  I had a big "lightbulb" moment when I read about the connection of Schaefer to purchasing the fishing boat company.  I thought that could explain the Caps connection and how Caps would know where to dive to see the cage.  Maybe Caps is one of the fishing boat company employees or owner.  Or maybe you have all already discussed that and I missed it.  I'm not trying to "out" Caps.  I was just very surprised to read that Schaefer bought those Aruban businesses around the same time as the sea search.

I have to go take care of the real "Iris" and her friends now. (mucking stalls and riding).  I'll check in later.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #797 1/30/09 -
Post by: Tamikosmom on January 31, 2009, 04:36:59 PM
KYLE KINGMAN - IN HIS OWN WORDS

oceanexploration
Re: Ocean Search - Aruba - December 2007
« Reply #99 on: January 18, 2008, 06:23:58 PM »


This wasn't part of any conspiracy or diversion. The Michelle was in distress. They likely lost their mast in which case they would lose GPS positioning.  By the time they realised they were in trouble they got disoriented and didn't know where they were.  Those seas were very rough. The night can be extremely disorienting especially with clouds on the horizon, no power, and bouncing around inside of a derilict boat.  It's courtesy to respond to distress calls when you're in the vicinity. 

The Persistence is always in the vicinity where Natalee could be found.  This is why we're searching.  IMO The Aruban authorities have done nothing but help in anyway they can.  
As for costing a nights work... the night was too rough to search and we would have turned towards the dock shortly anyhow.

http://scaredmonkeys.net/index.php?topic=2438.80


KYLE KINGMAN - IN HIS OWN WORDS

Kyle:
  We're being fed misinformation to keep us searching and out of their way while they cover their asses, destroy evidence, cover their tracks, and keep us out at sea and away from the trap.



Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #797 1/30/09 -
Post by: Tamikosmom on January 31, 2009, 04:38:34 PM
   
Please feel free to correct and add…Couldn’t spend any more time looking for the posts after Persistence returned. Don’t have the date that Donations were asked for.

November 2007
11/15/2007-Dave and Tim go see the Persistence-said mid November
11/26/2007-Mobilization of Persistence
11/30/2007-Persistence departs

December 2007
12/15/2007-Persistence arrived Aruba
12/18/2007-Persistence began search
12/25/2007-Located trap
12/25/2007-Tim Miller-Looks like a skull-Dateline video
12/26/2007-Persistence calibrations completed
12/29/2007-Dive Series of Persistence
12/30/2007-Dives-Thumbs Down - Mos etc on board
12/31/2007-Multiple ROV Dives

January 2008
01/07/2008-Tim and Dave off boat
01/07/2008-Persistence lost Internet Connectivity for 2 days until 1/09
01/07/2008-Trap contents sampled
01/07/2008-Aruban Divers dive from Aruban boat
01/07/2008-And 1/8-New night-time grid searches
01/11/2008-Kyle at HI for 4 days (10-14th of Jan)
01/11/2008-And 01/12 Kyle saw vessel at Persistence location
01/12/2008-Email to Dave
01/12/2008-Persistence never returned to site of trap after this
01/17/2008-Persistence gets call on “Michelle” in distress

February 2008
02/22/2008-Dateline Show about the sea search
02/29/2008-Kyle said they would be without internet for 2 or 3 days
02/29/2008-AF2 Arrives in Aruba

March 2008
03/03/2008-Persistence leaves Aruba
03/20/2008-Private Eye post re blue denim and skull




Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #797 1/30/09 -
Post by: A's Fever on January 31, 2009, 04:39:42 PM
See you later Monkeys.  Saturday afternoon chores beckon.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #797 1/30/09 -
Post by: 2NJSons_Mom on January 31, 2009, 04:41:47 PM

http://www.thefacts.com/story.lasso?ewcd=054bac688bc7c40c

Captain Elliott’s sells fishing operations

By Hunter Sauls
The Facts   

Published January 4, 2008

FREEPORT — As longtime owners of the charter fishing tour boats of Captain Elliott’s Party Boats pull out of the recreational fishing business — the new owner, Underwater Expeditions, is baiting their hooks.

Last January, the owners of Captain Elliott’s said they would be closing shop due to lack of profit and increased restrictions on red snapper fishing, their main attraction.

Since then, Kemah resident Louis Schaefer, chairman of Superior Offshore International Inc., a worldwide commercial diving company, has bought the two boats and is expected to close on a deal to buy the docks and buildings next month, said Casey Cundieff, vice president of Captain Elliott’s.

The first trip is scheduled for Jan. 18. They’ll be taking out the “Big E”, which can carry 105 people, on a 52-hour tour out for yellow and black fin tuna, said ship captain and Freeport resident Robert Poulsen.

“It’s going to be a lot of fun,” Poulsen said.
---
Casting a wide net

“We want to build recreational fishing as a major industry here in Freeport,” said Evonn Caraway, Underwater Expeditions office manager. While Captain Elliott’s dedicated their boats to fishing tours, Caraway said they are going to tailor their cruises to what their clients have in mind.

“We’ll be doing spear fishing, scuba diving, kayak shuttling and our main focus — offshore fishing,” Caraway said. “We’re not worried about the red snapper limits. So far, we’ve had no problems filling our books up.”

Not only will Underwater Expeditions be using the same boats and facilities as Captain Elliott’s, but they already have added another to the fleet, a 32-foot catamaran, and plan to add more, she said.

“We have the same captains, deckhands and everything, just new owners and new management,” she said.

They also held onto L.A. Cuban, the walking Rolodex of Captain Elliott’s. She has worked every position in the company since her first day in 1988.

“I know all the regular customers,” Cuban said with a smile.

The four-fish limit on red snapper per person, a federal regulation, is not a major concern for Underwater Expeditions, she said. Only a few of the dozens of clients who have called or made reservations have even mentioned the fish, Caraway said.

“To me grouper is better meat than snapper anyway, it’s lighter and less gamey,” Caraway said as she stood out on the docks near the 87-foot “Capt. Casey”, their older fishing boat, and the 133-foot “Big E”, the longer, sleeker 2005-model vessel. “Most people come out to fish whatever is in season.”
---
‘X’ marks the spot

Schaefer is not stopping there. He has also purchased the Bed and Breakfast next door to the docks, and the purchase of a new “expedition” ship is in the works, said Underwater Expeditions operations manager Jamie Stovall.

“If we’re going to do this, we’re going to do it right,” Stovall said. “We’re really excited about this acquisition.”

Until Underwater Expeditions can get a hold of their own boat, Schaefer is financing expeditions on other boats. One such expedition is currently out in Caribbean waters off Aruba looking for the remains of Natalee Holloway, an Alabama high school senior whose 2005 disappearance became a media sensation.

“We are also going to explore some sunken shipwrecks — for treasure,” Stovall said.

These expeditions are an interesting part of this investment, but not very profitable, Stovall said. The charter tour operations should make Underwater Expeditions break even, at least, he said.

“Louis believes that having fun in work is bigger and better than money,” Stovall said. “This isn’t a have-to business.”
---
Sailing to fairer seas

Even though the Big E and Capt. Casey have been sold to Schaefer, Captain Elliott’s Party Boats lives on as the parent company of Texas Crew Boats, Cundieff said. His father, Elliott Cundieff, started Captain Elliott’s in Freeport more than 30 years ago.

“As far as getting back in the fishing business, it doesn’t look like that will happen anytime soon,” Cundieff said.

In the meantime, the Cundieff family will be busy in their more profitable venture, Texas Crew Boats. The company’s seven, soon to be nine, $2 to $5 million boats ferry passengers, supplies, water, fuel and groceries out to offshore oil field workers, Cundieff said.

“The beauty part of the operation is they pay for the fuel and oil of our boats for each day we work,” he said. “So long as the jobs are steady, things are going well.”

Cundieff said he was relieved when Schaefer bought the recreational fishing boats. He didn’t see any profit in it.

“It was no secret that it wasn’t going well. Maybe he thinks he can do different stuff with it and make money,” he said. “The recreational fishing business is just too seasonal — I think we got lucky someone was willing to buy. I hope they’re able to maintain it.”


Until a deal is done on the docks, Cundieff said he would tie his personal fishing boat there. Afterward, he said he assumes he’ll be paying Underwater Expeditions monthly rent to leave his boat at the dock his family has owned for three decades.

“That’s going to feel a little strange,” he said.

Hunter Sauls covers Freeport for The Facts. Contact him at (979) 237-0153.

Bringing this forward.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #797 1/30/09 -
Post by: Keepthefaith on January 31, 2009, 04:59:48 PM
Schaefer buys boat's in Freeport,Tx!What does that have to do with Aruban businesses,as well as CapsLockWizard?


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #797 1/30/09 -
Post by: bastibro on January 31, 2009, 05:10:20 PM
ARUBA COVER-UP

(http://i18.photobucket.com/albums/b104/Blondeonahd/persistence/PersistenceHansMosandRichardson.jpg)



Idstlou said: ”The footage WAS turned over to the FBI immediately.”http://scaredmonkeys.net/index.php?topic=4340.500
 Idstlou said: ”Sceen shots were sent daily as intructed by the FBI agents in charge, and the footage was turned over at the first opportunity.” http://scaredmonkeys.net/index.php?topic=4340.540
Idstlou said: “They were working with two FBI agents from Barbados. The footage was turned over to them.”http://scaredmonkeys.net/index.php?topic=4340.560

Idstlou said: “I know that there were members of Quantico on board. http://scaredmonkeys.net/index.php?topic=4340.580

"Klye:  I did not give the information to the FBI and I'm unaware of anyone relaying the possibility to them.
pg 39http://scaredmonkeys.net/index.php?topic=4340.760

Quote from: ldstlou on January 02, 2009, 05:46:43 PM
I stated that posters have said part of your credibility stems from taking down a president and working beside two others. I simply asked them to elaborate. You don't have to tell me a thing if you don't want to.

Why do you want personal information on Kermit?
http://scaredmonkeys.net/index.php?topic=4340.420




POOP SUIT ALERT



LEAK said: "This comment was made by Jug during a recent phone conversation:
All of the stuff that Kermit posted
<snip>
FBI did not know about it..."


Kyle was contacted by the FBI AFTER Freebirds sent the evidence/information to them.http://scaredmonkeys.net/index.php?topic=4340.420



CAPS HAS 4 COMPUTERS:
My brain cell + 4 Computers are thinking in all possible scenarios,
http://scaredmonkeys.net/index.php?topic=2539.120

CAPS POSTED:
Got an email today from DH, why took so long?
http://scaredmonkeys.net/index.php?topic=2539.160


I would like to know why on February 7, Caps is talking about this witness on scared monkeys,
this is the witness that would only talk to John through his lawyer, fear of reprisal, but yet Caps feels it's okay to tell the world about him on February 7!








Really Kermit? Really? as my brother would say!
You are going to keep this charade up?

Because I have seen what I believe to be irrefutable evidence that you posted pics of a family member of yours here at SM and insinuated that those pics were of yourself...correct me please if I am wrong on this please.

If this is true, did your the family member know you were doing this and approve?

If I am wrong, I apologize, because then indeed I have been mislead by those trying to discredit you.
But if I am not wrong, then your integrity has been compromised.
If I am not wrong, then you did the misleading.
If I am not wrong, and you are capable of posting pics of a family family on a public forum and insinuating they are pics of yourself, then you are capable of taking Kyle's words out of context and creating a conspiracy theory involving the crew members of the Persistence, people who devoted a lot of their own time, energy and money to search for Natalee at the request of Tim Miler and Dave Holloway.
If I am not wrong, then I believe you are also capable of falsely accusing people of assisting the ALE by sending them info from the pro-Natalee boards with no proof other than "your word".

All of this is just my humble opinion of course.

I do hope that I am wrong.

I am off to the Travel Show.
No Justice for Natalee, No Tourists for Aruba!

LDSLOU,

You've made it abundantly clear that you believe Kermit is a fraud.  I respect your right to that opinion.  Now could you sjow the same respect for those of us to believe her to actually discuss the case by scrolling past what you don't believe and stop disruption all discussions other than how you feel about Kermit?

Not that it matters and only for the record: I always believed that the frog was a fraud to.
To me the latest developments confirm my suspicions. JMHO ::MonkeyNoNo::

bastibro are you still posting at BNH.
Just asking...


Hello Blonde, I`m a member at Bring Natalee Home, just never took the time to post anything there.
What`s your point?  TIA


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #797 1/30/09 -
Post by: 2NJSons_Mom on January 31, 2009, 05:10:29 PM
Schaefer buys boat's in Freeport,Tx!What does that have to do with Aruban businesses,as well as CapsLockWizard?

I didn't recall Lifesong's post having any info on aruban businesses.  That's why I brought it forward.  Guess it was a suggestion about that and/or Caps?   I don't know.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #797 1/30/09 -
Post by: Keepthefaith on January 31, 2009, 05:12:48 PM
Schaefer buys boat's in Freeport,Tx!What does that have to do with Aruban businesses,as well as CapsLockWizard?

I didn't recall Lifesong's post having any info on aruban businesses.  That's why I brought it forward.  Guess it was a suggestion about that and/or Caps?   I don't know.

Just doesn't make sense to me! ::MonkeyWink::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #797 1/30/09 -
Post by: Ree on January 31, 2009, 05:17:16 PM
I thought Hotshot put CAPS in touch with Schaffer?


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #797 1/30/09 -
Post by: Keepthefaith on January 31, 2009, 05:18:09 PM
I thought Hotshot put CAPS in touch with Schaffer?

Silvetti!


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #797 1/30/09 -
Post by: 2NJSons_Mom on January 31, 2009, 05:25:00 PM
DISCREPANCIES

From here to Aruba
BY JEFF MOORE, THE DAILY IBERIAN
Published/Last Modified on Thursday, November 29, 2007 12:37 PM CST


John Silvetti said his company became involved in the search after he was contacted by Louis Schaefer, chairman of Superior Offshore International. Schaefer had been approached by Texas Equusearch, a non-profit organization that has been searching for Holloway for more than two years

http://www.iberianet.com/articles/2007/11/29/news/news/news00.txt


TIM MILLER - IN HIS OWN WORDS

Natalee Holloway: Tim Miller of Texas EquuSearch Discusses Crab Trap, Clothing and DNA Found in Waters of Aruba
February 27, 2005 2008


I've been trying to put this together for 2 1/2 years.  Louis Schaefer came forward with John Silvetti. (3:40)

Video:
http://scaredmonkeys.com/2008/02/27/natalee-holloway-tim-miller-of-texas-equusearch-discusses-crab-trap-clothing-and-dna-found-in-waters-of-aruba/

++++++++

From here to Aruba
BY JEFF MOORE, THE DAILY IBERIAN
Published/Last Modified on Thursday, November 29, 2007 12:37 PM CST


Silvetti agreed to provide his equipment and primary survey vessel at well below cost, with Schaefer covering all out-of-pocket expenses. Silvetti said his staff volunteered its services for the project as well.

“They said ‘You don’t even have to pay me. I just want to help,’” Silvetti said. “That just tells me we’ve got the right people on board.”

http://www.iberianet.com/articles/2007/11/29/news/news/news00.txt


KYLE KINGMAN - IN HIS OWN WORDS

Kyle
:  I did not feel the same and we had a major difference in opinion. He [John Silvetti] was the one who never pressed ALE to be completely open with us with the trap evidence. I would have forced them to. However, John was the one paying my invoices so I was forced to sit back and hope for the best.


BUMP

Bump


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #797 1/30/09 -
Post by: Tibrogargan on January 31, 2009, 05:29:34 PM
This is for Sleuth & Tibro.  It is a picture from one of the commercials that will be featured on the Superbowl.

(http://i34.photobucket.com/albums/d118/Sanddrops/Sleuth.jpg)

Thank you San.  I hope we get to see this commercial here in one of our news items about the great game, which has the first Aussie to ever play in a Super Bowl. snip :  "At 10am tomorrow morning Queensland time, Ben Graham – the Arizona Cardinals' punter – will make history as the first Australian to play in the Super Bowl."

BTW this cute Koala tends to resemble Sleuth more than myself.   ::MonkeyCool::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #797 1/30/09 -
Post by: bastibro on January 31, 2009, 05:32:35 PM
These are the perpetrators in this case:

(http://i272.photobucket.com/albums/jj176/bastibro/Kalpoe/FFFFFFFFFFFF.jpg)

Caps, OE and even Kermit were/are just trying to get to the truth.
The problem is that some people having difficulties to stay humble and that they enjoy the fact that some people make them to important, unfortunately(and i exclude Kyle here) ::MonkeyWink::



Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #797 1/30/09 -
Post by: always 1 on January 31, 2009, 05:34:24 PM
Has anyone heard of or done any research on Casey Cundieff (or his dad) from Captain Elliott's?  Has it already been discussed here that Schaeffer had purchased Aruban businesses? 
Can you fill us in? I think you have told us that you have some personal knowledge of John and/or Louis. I would be interested in pursuing ANY angle you might feel relevant.

I have no personal knowledge of anyone at SM or the Persistence or the family.  I read the article that lifesong brought forward a few pages back.  I had a big "lightbulb" moment when I read about the connection of Schaefer to purchasing the fishing boat company.  I thought that could explain the Caps connection and how Caps would know where to dive to see the cage.  Maybe Caps is one of the fishing boat company employees or owner.  Or maybe you have all already discussed that and I missed it.  I'm not trying to "out" Caps.  I was just very surprised to read that Schaefer bought those Aruban businesses around the same time as the sea search.

I have to go take care of the real "Iris" and her friends now. (mucking stalls and riding).  I'll check in later.
Mucking stalls - we have feces suits!!!!


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #797 1/30/09 -
Post by: Tamikosmom on January 31, 2009, 05:42:38 PM
Has anyone heard of or done any research on Casey Cundieff (or his dad) from Captain Elliott's?  Has it already been discussed here that Schaeffer had purchased Aruban businesses? 
Can you fill us in? I think you have told us that you have some personal knowledge of John and/or Louis. I would be interested in pursuing ANY angle you might feel relevant.

I would truly like to know why Iris disregards Kyle Kingman's own words ... words that imply a John Silvetti participation in the finale to the great Aruban coverup.

I would like to know why Iris does not come right out and state that Kyle Kingman is the grandfahter of all liars.

She cannot have it both ways.

Kyle Kingman is not a 14 years old kid.  Kyle Kingman is an adult.  Kyle is a university graduate.  Kyle Kingman has a professional career in oceanography.  Kyle Kingman owns his own company.  Kyle Kingman is a husband.  Kyle Kingman is a father.  Kyle Kingman held a professional position on board the Persistence ... a profession profession that encompassed his expertise of "remote analyzing".  Above all ... Kyle is a professing Christian.

The Kyle Kingman issue is not a conspiracy theory.  No theory ... no speculation necessary.  Kyle Kingman clearly reveals the actual conspiracy encompassing the Persistence undertaking in his own words.

It is out of love for a brother in Christ that I will encourage Kyle to what is right.  As there are consequences for wrongoing ... doing what is right is not always easy but ... Kyle, it is right.

Janet

+++++++


iris44
Re: Natalee Case Discussion #791 1/6/09 -
« Reply #487 on: January 08, 2009, 05:58:05 AM »


If all this Persistence/Kyle conspiracy theory stuff is the real deal, why is the family, the media, etc. not jumping all over it?  The more I read all Kyle's "statements" the more he reminds of when my son was 14 and had his own website.  I think Kyle the ocean exploring geek has a little make believe world going on, and you're all going along for the ride.   If nobody has any real evidence here (no, Kyle's words are not evidence), I think it's time to get off this subject, especially if it is hurting the family.  I would bank on the fact that the family, DeVries, Tim Miller, Greta, etc. all have a better idea of the real facts of the case than Kyle does.  Re-read the end of Beth's book for her theory, re-watch the Dateline show and see the dedication on the faces of everyone working together on the Persistence.  This Kyle stuff is nothing but conspiracy theory.  You are losing some of the smartest monkeys because most of you are locked onto this one theory, and some are being mean to those who oppose "the" theory!  And aren't the snarky posts talking about other posters off-topic?

http://scaredmonkeys.net/index.php?topic=4351.msg617328#msg617328


KYLE KINGMAN - IN HIS OWN WORDS

Professional Qualifications

 
Kyle Kingman
Senior Geophysical Project Manager at Alpine Ocean Seismic Survey Inc.
Greater New York City Area

 
Current
Senior Geophysical Operations Manager at Alpine Ocean Seismic Survey Inc.
 
Past
Manager at Kingman Geophysical Solutions
 
Education
Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey-New Brunswick

Industry
Oil & Energy
_______
 
Kyle Kingman’s Summary

Kyle Kingman’s Specialties:
 
Project Management, Sonar Acquisition, hydrographic survey, data processing, remote sensing data analysis.
 
http://www.linkedin.com/pub/b/65/464


oceanexploration
Re: Natalee Case Discussion #742 3/10 - 3/14/08
« Reply #923 on: March 14, 2008, 01:23:03 PM »


... Dr. Hodges never skipped a beat.  His theories are far outside of my expertise, so I'm in no position to judge them as valid or not.  I hope they're valid for their potential application to other future cases and current cold cases.  As far as the search goes, the theories played no part in the planning or execution of the search.  Regardless, I enjoyed talking with him particularly in terms of our mutual faith in Jesus Christ.


oceanexploration
Re: Natalee Case Discussion #703 12/8/2007
« Reply #166 on: December 09, 2007, 01:18:35 AM
»

I say this with absolute conviction... I do not have enough faith to be an atheist in times like this.  It is examples such as these that remind humanity that people still go out of their way for others. About 2000 years ago there was the perfect example of a loving sacrifice.  So do I expect a miracle?  Perhaps a better question is... what are our expectations of that miracle?

http://scaredmonkeys.net/index.php?topic=2432.msg315649;topicseen#msg315649



Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #797 1/30/09 -
Post by: bastibro on January 31, 2009, 05:43:05 PM
ARUBA COVER-UP

(http://i18.photobucket.com/albums/b104/Blondeonahd/persistence/PersistenceHansMosandRichardson.jpg)



Idstlou said: ”The footage WAS turned over to the FBI immediately.”http://scaredmonkeys.net/index.php?topic=4340.500
 Idstlou said: ”Sceen shots were sent daily as intructed by the FBI agents in charge, and the footage was turned over at the first opportunity.” http://scaredmonkeys.net/index.php?topic=4340.540
Idstlou said: “They were working with two FBI agents from Barbados. The footage was turned over to them.”http://scaredmonkeys.net/index.php?topic=4340.560

Idstlou said: “I know that there were members of Quantico on board. http://scaredmonkeys.net/index.php?topic=4340.580

"Klye:  I did not give the information to the FBI and I'm unaware of anyone relaying the possibility to them.
pg 39http://scaredmonkeys.net/index.php?topic=4340.760

Quote from: ldstlou on January 02, 2009, 05:46:43 PM
I stated that posters have said part of your credibility stems from taking down a president and working beside two others. I simply asked them to elaborate. You don't have to tell me a thing if you don't want to.

Why do you want personal information on Kermit?
http://scaredmonkeys.net/index.php?topic=4340.420




POOP SUIT ALERT



LEAK said: "This comment was made by Jug during a recent phone conversation:
All of the stuff that Kermit posted
<snip>
FBI did not know about it..."


Kyle was contacted by the FBI AFTER Freebirds sent the evidence/information to them.http://scaredmonkeys.net/index.php?topic=4340.420



CAPS HAS 4 COMPUTERS:
My brain cell + 4 Computers are thinking in all possible scenarios,
http://scaredmonkeys.net/index.php?topic=2539.120

CAPS POSTED:
Got an email today from DH, why took so long?
http://scaredmonkeys.net/index.php?topic=2539.160


I would like to know why on February 7, Caps is talking about this witness on scared monkeys,
this is the witness that would only talk to John through his lawyer, fear of reprisal, but yet Caps feels it's okay to tell the world about him on February 7!








Really Kermit? Really? as my brother would say!
You are going to keep this charade up?

Because I have seen what I believe to be irrefutable evidence that you posted pics of a family member of yours here at SM and insinuated that those pics were of yourself...correct me please if I am wrong on this please.

If this is true, did your the family member know you were doing this and approve?

If I am wrong, I apologize, because then indeed I have been mislead by those trying to discredit you.
But if I am not wrong, then your integrity has been compromised.
If I am not wrong, then you did the misleading.
If I am not wrong, and you are capable of posting pics of a family family on a public forum and insinuating they are pics of yourself, then you are capable of taking Kyle's words out of context and creating a conspiracy theory involving the crew members of the Persistence, people who devoted a lot of their own time, energy and money to search for Natalee at the request of Tim Miler and Dave Holloway.
If I am not wrong, then I believe you are also capable of falsely accusing people of assisting the ALE by sending them info from the pro-Natalee boards with no proof other than "your word".

All of this is just my humble opinion of course.

I do hope that I am wrong.

I am off to the Travel Show.
No Justice for Natalee, No Tourists for Aruba!

LDSLOU,

You've made it abundantly clear that you believe Kermit is a fraud.  I respect your right to that opinion.  Now could you sjow the same respect for those of us to believe her to actually discuss the case by scrolling past what you don't believe and stop disruption all discussions other than how you feel about Kermit?

Not that it matters and only for the record: I always believed that the frog was a fraud to.
To me the latest developments confirm my suspicions. JMHO ::MonkeyNoNo::

bastibro are you still posting at BNH.
Just asking...


Hello Blonde, I`m a member at Bring Natalee Home, just never took the time to post anything there.
What`s your point?  TIA

BTW Blonde ::MonkeyEek:: Are U still talking to Reality on the phone?
Just asking ::MonkeyWink::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #797 1/30/09 -
Post by: blah on January 31, 2009, 05:43:37 PM
SO, hows Brinkmans investigation going?  Or was that just a bunch of hot air?


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #797 1/30/09 -
Post by: Lady Devon on January 31, 2009, 05:44:49 PM
It took me several attempts to login (kept getting message that I didn't exist
javascript:void(0); ::MonkeyShocked::, but knew that was not correct) I seldom post
because I do not usually have time and everyone else does a much better job at expressing themselves (usually saying what I am feeling or thinking). I got bumped off the forum and couldn't get back in for a while, so apologize that this post is after the fact.

I just wrote , deleted, then re-wrote what I wanted to say and I still can't come close to expressing my thoughts when it comes to Idstlou's posts, so I am going to simply give up. I will say, Kermit, it was a difficult decision you made to share info with us. It took a person of great character and strength to do what was right. If it were possible, I would hug you and thank you in person. I am so sorry that you have been treated so poorly by some. In my book, you are a true hero. Thank you.

Since I seldom post and won't suffer if I am banned or reprimanded , I will say to Idstlou, "Enough!"  Be silent long enough to read what others have shared with you, take the time to READ EVERY WORD. Then, step away from the forum(from reading or posting)  until you can distance yourself from emotion and evaluate the information the info that  has been offered to you. TAKE YOUR TIME to really think it through, then return, so there can be an open discussion and all sides can be shared.You may be surprised at the amount of respect you will garner once emotions are out of the picture. You may not change your mind, nor anyone else's but at least all will be heard.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #797 1/30/09 -
Post by: always 1 on January 31, 2009, 05:47:33 PM
These are the perpetrators in this case:

(http://i272.photobucket.com/albums/jj176/bastibro/Kalpoe/FFFFFFFFFFFF.jpg)

Caps, OE and even Kermit were/are just trying to get to the truth.
The problem is that some people having difficulties to stay humble and that they enjoy the fact that some people make them to important, unfortunately(and i exclude Kyle here) ::MonkeyWink::


Gosh Basitibro, I thought that was an acutal light from a gun with scope at first - scary.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #797 1/30/09 -
Post by: Tamikosmom on January 31, 2009, 05:54:28 PM
These are the perpetrators in this case:

(http://i272.photobucket.com/albums/jj176/bastibro/Kalpoe/FFFFFFFFFFFF.jpg)

Caps, OE and even Kermit were/are just trying to get to the truth.
The problem is that some people having difficulties to stay humble and that they enjoy the fact that some people make them to important, unfortunately(and i exclude Kyle here) ::MonkeyWink::



bastibro ... I assume you believe that Kermit should have kept quiet regarding her/his  knowledge encompassing John Silvetti's participation in the finale' to the great Aruban coverup ... a coverup that has prevented justice from prevailing for 3 1/2 years and ... put Natalee Holloway's family through a H--- on Earth.

Please think about it bastibro.  What would your position be if there had been a posibility that your loved one was placed in that cage/trap?  Would you have appreciated someone with a sense of justice to have stepped forward and exposed the deception?

Sincerely, Janet


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #797 1/30/09 -
Post by: Tamikosmom on January 31, 2009, 06:03:26 PM

I Just got back from being with Mom, she is the same, and not ready to get off the life suport ::MonkeyNoNo::


http://scaredmonkeys.net/index.php?topic=147.2220



Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #797 1/30/09 -
Post by: Tamikosmom on January 31, 2009, 06:09:05 PM
ARUBA COVER-UP

(http://i18.photobucket.com/albums/b104/Blondeonahd/persistence/PersistenceHansMosandRichardson.jpg)



Idstlou said: ”The footage WAS turned over to the FBI immediately.”http://scaredmonkeys.net/index.php?topic=4340.500
 Idstlou said: ”Sceen shots were sent daily as intructed by the FBI agents in charge, and the footage was turned over at the first opportunity.” http://scaredmonkeys.net/index.php?topic=4340.540
Idstlou said: “They were working with two FBI agents from Barbados. The footage was turned over to them.”http://scaredmonkeys.net/index.php?topic=4340.560

Idstlou said: “I know that there were members of Quantico on board. http://scaredmonkeys.net/index.php?topic=4340.580

"Klye:  I did not give the information to the FBI and I'm unaware of anyone relaying the possibility to them.
pg 39http://scaredmonkeys.net/index.php?topic=4340.760

Quote from: ldstlou on January 02, 2009, 05:46:43 PM
I stated that posters have said part of your credibility stems from taking down a president and working beside two others. I simply asked them to elaborate. You don't have to tell me a thing if you don't want to.

Why do you want personal information on Kermit?
http://scaredmonkeys.net/index.php?topic=4340.420




POOP SUIT ALERT



LEAK said: "This comment was made by Jug during a recent phone conversation:
All of the stuff that Kermit posted
<snip>
FBI did not know about it..."


Kyle was contacted by the FBI AFTER Freebirds sent the evidence/information to them.http://scaredmonkeys.net/index.php?topic=4340.420



CAPS HAS 4 COMPUTERS:
My brain cell + 4 Computers are thinking in all possible scenarios,
http://scaredmonkeys.net/index.php?topic=2539.120

CAPS POSTED:
Got an email today from DH, why took so long?
http://scaredmonkeys.net/index.php?topic=2539.160


I would like to know why on February 7, Caps is talking about this witness on scared monkeys,
this is the witness that would only talk to John through his lawyer, fear of reprisal, but yet Caps feels it's okay to tell the world about him on February 7!








Really Kermit? Really? as my brother would say!
You are going to keep this charade up?

Because I have seen what I believe to be irrefutable evidence that you posted pics of a family member of yours here at SM and insinuated that those pics were of yourself...correct me please if I am wrong on this please.

If this is true, did your the family member know you were doing this and approve?

If I am wrong, I apologize, because then indeed I have been mislead by those trying to discredit you.
But if I am not wrong, then your integrity has been compromised.
If I am not wrong, then you did the misleading.
If I am not wrong, and you are capable of posting pics of a family family on a public forum and insinuating they are pics of yourself, then you are capable of taking Kyle's words out of context and creating a conspiracy theory involving the crew members of the Persistence, people who devoted a lot of their own time, energy and money to search for Natalee at the request of Tim Miler and Dave Holloway.
If I am not wrong, then I believe you are also capable of falsely accusing people of assisting the ALE by sending them info from the pro-Natalee boards with no proof other than "your word".

All of this is just my humble opinion of course.

I do hope that I am wrong.

I am off to the Travel Show.
No Justice for Natalee, No Tourists for Aruba!

LDSLOU,

You've made it abundantly clear that you believe Kermit is a fraud.  I respect your right to that opinion.  Now could you sjow the same respect for those of us to believe her to actually discuss the case by scrolling past what you don't believe and stop disruption all discussions other than how you feel about Kermit?

Not that it matters and only for the record: I always believed that the frog was a fraud to.
To me the latest developments confirm my suspicions. JMHO ::MonkeyNoNo::

bastibro are you still posting at BNH.
Just asking...


Hello Blonde, I`m a member at Bring Natalee Home, just never took the time to post anything there.
What`s your point?  TIA

BTW Blonde ::MonkeyEek:: Are U still talking to Reality on the phone?
Just asking ::MonkeyWink::

Blonde was open with the members of the Truth For Natalee forum when she conversed with Reality in regards to an issue.

What interests me more is that YOU WERE THERE!!!

Were you a guest?  Were you a member?  What was your nic?

This wannabe detective is speculating ...

Janet



Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #797 1/30/09 -
Post by: Sleuth on January 31, 2009, 06:09:53 PM
This is for Sleuth & Tibro.  It is a picture from one of the commercials that will be featured on the Superbowl.


Thank you San.  I hope we get to see this commercial here in one of our news items about the great game, which has the first Aussie to ever play in a Super Bowl. snip :  "At 10am tomorrow morning Queensland time, Ben Graham – the Arizona Cardinals' punter – will make history as the first Australian to play in the Super Bowl."
BTW this cute Koala tends to resemble Sleuth more than myself.   ::MonkeyCool::

Thank you San and Tibro. 
Those glasses are part of my disguise.  If I'm lucky I'll get to ride one of those Clydesdale......
I hope Ben Graham gets lots of action kicking the ball back to the Steelers  on 4th downs ::MonkeyHaHa::
You had the wrong mug, though :: ::MonkeyWink::
(http://i719.photobucket.com/albums/ww194/photo_777/SuperBowlSleuth.jpg)


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #797 1/30/09 -
Post by: klaasend on January 31, 2009, 06:11:48 PM
SO, hows Brinkmans investigation going?  Or was that just a bunch of hot air?

Appears to have been hot air or stopped in it's tracks.  ::MonkeyRoll::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #797 1/30/09 -
Post by: bastibro on January 31, 2009, 06:13:38 PM

I Just got back from being with Mom, she is the same, and not ready to get off the life suport ::MonkeyNoNo::


http://scaredmonkeys.net/index.php?topic=147.2220



I pray for you Blonde, with great believes, to have more time with youre mom . .


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #797 1/30/09 -
Post by: Tamikosmom on January 31, 2009, 06:17:13 PM
SO, hows Brinkmans investigation going?  Or was that just a bunch of hot air?

Appears to have been hot air or stopped in it's tracks.  ::MonkeyRoll::



Stopped in it's track!!

You are really feared/respected Klaas.  Hey ... Tamikosmom has nightmares regarding the "red botton".

  ::MonkeyShocked::

Janet



Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #797 1/30/09 -
Post by: Tamikosmom on January 31, 2009, 06:19:44 PM
I thought Hotshot put CAPS in touch with Schaffer?

Hotshot
Re: Natalee Case Discussion #792 1/9/09 -
« Reply #835 on: January 13, 2009, 10:04:13 AM »


I dont need to prove things to you.  I told you I got CAPS to silvetti, I got CAPS to DAVE.....  then later on CAPS gave me Silvettis number.  That is all there is to it.  I didnt inject myself, I got them in touch with who they needed to get in touch with.  Not a big deal. 

http://scaredmonkeys.net/index.php?topic=4363.msg624464#msg624464


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #797 1/30/09 -
Post by: always 1 on January 31, 2009, 06:20:08 PM
SO, hows Brinkmans investigation going?  Or was that just a bunch of hot air?

Appears to have been hot air or stopped in it's tracks.  ::MonkeyRoll::



Stopped in it's track!!

You are really feared/respected Klaas.  Hey ... Tamikosmom has nightmares regarding the "red botton".

  ::MonkeyShocked::

Janet


What's a red botton????


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #797 1/30/09 -
Post by: Keepthefaith on January 31, 2009, 06:28:35 PM
These are the perpetrators in this case:

(http://i272.photobucket.com/albums/jj176/bastibro/Kalpoe/FFFFFFFFFFFF.jpg)

Caps, OE and even Kermit were/are just trying to get to the truth.
The problem is that some people having difficulties to stay humble and that they enjoy the fact that some people make them to important, unfortunately(and i exclude Kyle here) ::MonkeyWink::



1.Kermit-posted nothing but the truth backed up by the Freebirds,as well as Kyle!
2.Kyle-Potentially an accessory to obstruction of justice.Backed up by his own words,as well as actions.
3.CapsLockWizard-Has posted many false statements regarding this case!

And you call Kermit the fraud! ::MonkeyLaugh::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #797 1/30/09 -
Post by: bastibro on January 31, 2009, 06:39:26 PM
These are the perpetrators in this case:

(http://i272.photobucket.com/albums/jj176/bastibro/Kalpoe/FFFFFFFFFFFF.jpg)

Caps, OE and even Kermit were/are just trying to get to the truth.
The problem is that some people having difficulties to stay humble and that they enjoy the fact that some people make them to important, unfortunately(and i exclude Kyle here) ::MonkeyWink::



1.Kermit-posted nothing but the truth backed up by the Freebirds,as well as Kyle!
2.Kyle-Potentially an accessory to obstruction of justice.Backed up by his own words,as well as actions.
3.CapsLockWizard-Has posted many false statements regarding this case!

And you call Kermit the fraud! ::MonkeyLaugh::

Kyle`s own words were ripped off their context by her. That`s my answer to you and to Janet.

sincerely, Bastian.

(http://i272.photobucket.com/albums/jj176/bastibro/Natalee/2fp29beth2.jpg)


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #797 1/30/09 -
Post by: Tibrogargan on January 31, 2009, 06:41:11 PM
SO, hows Brinkmans investigation going?  Or was that just a bunch of hot air?

Appears to have been hot air or stopped in it's tracks.  ::MonkeyRoll::



Stopped in it's track!!

You are really feared/respected Klaas.  Hey ... Tamikosmom has nightmares regarding the "red botton".

  ::MonkeyShocked::

Janet


What's a red botton????

A red botton is what is awarded to the monkey with the highest number of inane posts at the end of each year.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #797 1/30/09 -
Post by: Keepthefaith on January 31, 2009, 06:41:33 PM
These are the perpetrators in this case:

(http://i272.photobucket.com/albums/jj176/bastibro/Kalpoe/FFFFFFFFFFFF.jpg)

Caps, OE and even Kermit were/are just trying to get to the truth.
The problem is that some people having difficulties to stay humble and that they enjoy the fact that some people make them to important, unfortunately(and i exclude Kyle here) ::MonkeyWink::



1.Kermit-posted nothing but the truth backed up by the Freebirds,as well as Kyle!
2.Kyle-Potentially an accessory to obstruction of justice.Backed up by his own words,as well as actions.
3.CapsLockWizard-Has posted many false statements regarding this case!

And you call Kermit the fraud! ::MonkeyLaugh::

Kyle(OE)

"I haven't seen Kermit post anything untrue presented as factual.  He's expressed his opinion, been taken out of context and misunderstood a few times, but he's pretty spot on as far as facts are concerned."


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #797 1/30/09 -
Post by: Keepthefaith on January 31, 2009, 06:46:22 PM
These are the perpetrators in this case:

(http://i272.photobucket.com/albums/jj176/bastibro/Kalpoe/FFFFFFFFFFFF.jpg)

Caps, OE and even Kermit were/are just trying to get to the truth.
The problem is that some people having difficulties to stay humble and that they enjoy the fact that some people make them to important, unfortunately(and i exclude Kyle here) ::MonkeyWink::



1.Kermit-posted nothing but the truth backed up by the Freebirds,as well as Kyle!
2.Kyle-Potentially an accessory to obstruction of justice.Backed up by his own words,as well as actions.
3.CapsLockWizard-Has posted many false statements regarding this case!

And you call Kermit the fraud! ::MonkeyLaugh::

Kyle(OE)

"I haven't seen Kermit post anything untrue presented as factual.  He's expressed his opinion, been taken out of context and misunderstood a few times, but he's pretty spot on as far as facts are concerned."

Kyle is vouching for Kermit in his own words Bastibro.What say you??


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #797 1/30/09 -
Post by: Magnolia on January 31, 2009, 06:48:01 PM
These are the perpetrators in this case:

(http://i272.photobucket.com/albums/jj176/bastibro/Kalpoe/FFFFFFFFFFFF.jpg)

Caps, OE and even Kermit were/are just trying to get to the truth.
The problem is that some people having difficulties to stay humble and that they enjoy the fact that some people make them to important, unfortunately(and i exclude Kyle here) ::MonkeyWink::



1.Kermit-posted nothing but the truth backed up by the Freebirds,as well as Kyle!
2.Kyle-Potentially an accessory to obstruction of justice.Backed up by his own words,as well as actions.
3.CapsLockWizard-Has posted many false statements regarding this case!

And you call Kermit the fraud! ::MonkeyLaugh::

Kyle`s own words were ripped off their context by her. That`s my answer to you and to Janet.

sincerely, Bastian.

(http://i272.photobucket.com/albums/jj176/bastibro/Natalee/2fp29beth2.jpg)

Oh, Bastibro, you are so lying your little head off.
I have seen you posting at BNH.
I registered there but they kicked me off because I never posted.
They would have kicked you to the curb too, if you had never posted.
All of the Freebirds have come here and stated that Kyle's post
were never taken out of context and were exactly as posted.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #797 1/30/09 -
Post by: 2NJSons_Mom on January 31, 2009, 06:49:11 PM
Tibro,

 ::MonkeyHaHa::


 


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #797 1/30/09 -
Post by: klaasend on January 31, 2009, 06:59:15 PM
SO, hows Brinkmans investigation going?  Or was that just a bunch of hot air?

Appears to have been hot air or stopped in it's tracks.  ::MonkeyRoll::



Stopped in it's track!!

You are really feared/respected Klaas.  Hey ... Tamikosmom has nightmares regarding the "red botton".

  ::MonkeyShocked::

Janet



Feared, LOLOL  ::MonkeyHaHa::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #797 1/30/09 -
Post by: klaasend on January 31, 2009, 07:01:42 PM
With my own eyes I have seen Bastibro's posts at BNH and CnG. 


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #797 1/30/09 -
Post by: always 1 on January 31, 2009, 07:02:09 PM
SO, hows Brinkmans investigation going?  Or was that just a bunch of hot air?

Appears to have been hot air or stopped in it's tracks.  ::MonkeyRoll::



Stopped in it's track!!

You are really feared/respected Klaas.  Hey ... Tamikosmom has nightmares regarding the "red botton".

  ::MonkeyShocked::

Janet


What's a  ::MonkeyShocked::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #797 1/30/09 -
Post by: hotping on January 31, 2009, 07:03:37 PM
These are the perpetrators in this case:

(http://i272.photobucket.com/albums/jj176/bastibro/Kalpoe/FFFFFFFFFFFF.jpg)

Caps, OE and even Kermit were/are just trying to get to the truth.
The problem is that some people having difficulties to stay humble and that they enjoy the fact that some people make them to important, unfortunately(and i exclude Kyle here) ::MonkeyWink::



1.Kermit-posted nothing but the truth backed up by the Freebirds,as well as Kyle!
2.Kyle-Potentially an accessory to obstruction of justice.Backed up by his own words,as well as actions.
3.CapsLockWizard-Has posted many false statements regarding this case!

And you call Kermit the fraud! ::MonkeyLaugh::

Kyle(OE)

"I haven't seen Kermit post anything untrue presented as factual.  He's expressed his opinion, been taken out of context and misunderstood a few times, but he's pretty spot on as far as facts are concerned."

Kyle is vouching for Kermit in his own words Bastibro.What say you??
KTF...I'm sure Bastibro will be right back He just had to go ask someone how to answer... ::MonkeyWink::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #797 1/30/09 -
Post by: Keepthefaith on January 31, 2009, 07:04:14 PM
With my own eyes I have seen Bastibro's posts at BNH and CnG. 

 ::MonkeyCool:: ::MonkeyWink::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #797 1/30/09 -
Post by: Mere on January 31, 2009, 07:05:13 PM
With my own eyes I have seen Bastibro's posts at BNH and CnG. 

Well I bet they are digging a deeper hole at this very moment....makes me smile.... ::MonkeyDance::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #797 1/30/09 -
Post by: 2NJSons_Mom on January 31, 2009, 07:05:53 PM
With my own eyes I have seen Bastibro's posts at BNH and CnG. 

Thanks, Klaas.  It's amazing what you see.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #797 1/30/09 -
Post by: Keepthefaith on January 31, 2009, 07:06:56 PM
These are the perpetrators in this case:

(http://i272.photobucket.com/albums/jj176/bastibro/Kalpoe/FFFFFFFFFFFF.jpg)

Caps, OE and even Kermit were/are just trying to get to the truth.
The problem is that some people having difficulties to stay humble and that they enjoy the fact that some people make them to important, unfortunately(and i exclude Kyle here) ::MonkeyWink::



1.Kermit-posted nothing but the truth backed up by the Freebirds,as well as Kyle!
2.Kyle-Potentially an accessory to obstruction of justice.Backed up by his own words,as well as actions.
3.CapsLockWizard-Has posted many false statements regarding this case!

And you call Kermit the fraud! ::MonkeyLaugh::

Kyle(OE)

"I haven't seen Kermit post anything untrue presented as factual.  He's expressed his opinion, been taken out of context and misunderstood a few times, but he's pretty spot on as far as facts are concerned."

Kyle is vouching for Kermit in his own words Bastibro.What say you??
KTF...I'm sure Bastibro will be right back He just had to go ask someone how to answer... ::MonkeyWink::

I haven't seen anyone challenge Kermit's post's with any fact's or substance.I will stand with the frog all day! ::MonkeyCool::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #797 1/30/09 -
Post by: Keepthefaith on January 31, 2009, 07:10:00 PM
With my own eyes I have seen Bastibro's posts at BNH and CnG. 

 ::MonkeyCool:: ::MonkeyWink::

Welcome back Bastibro! ::MonkeyCool::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #797 1/30/09 -
Post by: 2NJSons_Mom on January 31, 2009, 07:10:47 PM
I agree, KTF.  Nothing to back up the post....just an opinion. 


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #797 1/30/09 -
Post by: texasmom on January 31, 2009, 07:11:45 PM
These are the perpetrators in this case:

(http://i272.photobucket.com/albums/jj176/bastibro/Kalpoe/FFFFFFFFFFFF.jpg)

Caps, OE and even Kermit were/are just trying to get to the truth.
The problem is that some people having difficulties to stay humble and that they enjoy the fact that some people make them to important, unfortunately(and i exclude Kyle here) ::MonkeyWink::



1.Kermit-posted nothing but the truth backed up by the Freebirds,as well as Kyle!
2.Kyle-Potentially an accessory to obstruction of justice.Backed up by his own words,as well as actions.
3.CapsLockWizard-Has posted many false statements regarding this case!

And you call Kermit the fraud! ::MonkeyLaugh::

Kyle(OE)

"I haven't seen Kermit post anything untrue presented as factual.  He's expressed his opinion, been taken out of context and misunderstood a few times, but he's pretty spot on as far as facts are concerned."

Kyle is vouching for Kermit in his own words Bastibro.What say you??
KTF...I'm sure Bastibro will be right back He just had to go ask someone how to answer... ::MonkeyWink::

Yep, hidey hole huddle!   ::MonkeyTongue::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #797 1/30/09 -
Post by: Magnolia on January 31, 2009, 07:12:37 PM
These are the perpetrators in this case:

(http://i272.photobucket.com/albums/jj176/bastibro/Kalpoe/FFFFFFFFFFFF.jpg)

Caps, OE and even Kermit were/are just trying to get to the truth.
The problem is that some people having difficulties to stay humble and that they enjoy the fact that some people make them to important, unfortunately(and i exclude Kyle here) ::MonkeyWink::



1.Kermit-posted nothing but the truth backed up by the Freebirds,as well as Kyle!
2.Kyle-Potentially an accessory to obstruction of justice.Backed up by his own words,as well as actions.
3.CapsLockWizard-Has posted many false statements regarding this case!

And you call Kermit the fraud! ::MonkeyLaugh::

Kyle(OE)

"I haven't seen Kermit post anything untrue presented as factual.  He's expressed his opinion, been taken out of context and misunderstood a few times, but he's pretty spot on as far as facts are concerned."

Kyle is vouching for Kermit in his own words Bastibro.What say you??
KTF...I'm sure Bastibro will be right back He just had to go ask someone how to answer... ::MonkeyWink::

I think his shift for the disruptions was over anyway.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #797 1/30/09 -
Post by: hotping on January 31, 2009, 07:13:17 PM
These are the perpetrators in this case:

(http://i272.photobucket.com/albums/jj176/bastibro/Kalpoe/FFFFFFFFFFFF.jpg)

Caps, OE and even Kermit were/are just trying to get to the truth.
The problem is that some people having difficulties to stay humble and that they enjoy the fact that some people make them to important, unfortunately(and i exclude Kyle here) ::MonkeyWink::



1.Kermit-posted nothing but the truth backed up by the Freebirds,as well as Kyle!
2.Kyle-Potentially an accessory to obstruction of justice.Backed up by his own words,as well as actions.
3.CapsLockWizard-Has posted many false statements regarding this case!

And you call Kermit the fraud! ::MonkeyLaugh::

Kyle(OE)

"I haven't seen Kermit post anything untrue presented as factual.  He's expressed his opinion, been taken out of context and misunderstood a few times, but he's pretty spot on as far as facts are concerned."

Kyle is vouching for Kermit in his own words Bastibro.What say you??
KTF...I'm sure Bastibro will be right back He just had to go ask someone how to answer... ::MonkeyWink::

Yep, hidey hole huddle!   ::MonkeyTongue::
Bingo!


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #797 1/30/09 -
Post by: Seamonkey on January 31, 2009, 07:14:14 PM
(http://i446.photobucket.com/albums/qq188/IndigoBunny/bobbleheadco1.gif)


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #797 1/30/09 -
Post by: Keepthefaith on January 31, 2009, 07:15:17 PM
(http://i446.photobucket.com/albums/qq188/IndigoBunny/bobbleheadco1.gif)

Copy,paste,copy,paste,copy,paste!

Back to the hidey-hole.HEY!Back to the Hide-holey.Hey!!!! ::MonkeyDance::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #797 1/30/09 -
Post by: Tamikosmom on January 31, 2009, 07:18:08 PM

Kyle`s own words were ripped off their context by her. That`s my answer to you and to Janet.

sincerely, Bastian.

(http://i272.photobucket.com/albums/jj176/bastibro/Natalee/2fp29beth2.jpg)


Please share how you know that Kermit posted Kyle Kingman's post out context, bastibro.  As far as I am aware ... all Kyle Kingman's posts with related IP Numbers have been shared with Beth Holloway, FBI and John Kelly and ... are archived for safe keeping.

Kermit did not lie.  Jen did not lie.

bastibro ... I have posted along side of Jen and Kermit since way back and ... granted we have had our issues at times but ... I stand behind their integrity 100%.  All of Jen and Kermit's afforded time and effort researching this case has been about exposing the corrupt Aruban investion that has prevented justice from prevailing for Natalee Holloway since the getgo as well as ... supporting the family as they have been forced to ride the ongoing roller coaster from H--- ... compliments of Aruba.

Silence from Kermit ... silence from Jen ... silence from the rest of the Natalee's Freebirds' flock ... would have implied that John Silvetti was being abetted in the finale to the great Aruban coverup.

Janet

++++++

klassend
Re: Natalee Case Discussion #787 12/24/08 -
« Reply #411 on: December 30, 2008, 06:53:44 PM »

Sent to me by Natalee's Freebirds:


Please feel free (if you'd like) to post this at your board.
 
During the journey of the Persistence to Aruba, Kyle reached out and emailed with us.  During that time, one of the questions posed to him was regarding protocol if/when Natalee's remains were found.
 
Kyle's response was that he was unsure, but felt that would be settled before the search began.
 
The cautions were given to him about the lack of integrity on the part of Aruba's law enforcement, prosecutor's office, and its judiciary.
 
Contact with Kyle continued throughout the duration of the search by the Persistence.
 
Once back home, Kyle asked us for our help.  He was very concerned about the activities that transpired during their search - specifically surrounding the find of the fishing cage and its contents.  Kyle wanted our help in presenting this information in a factual way, to then be given to Natalee's family. 
 
This was March 18, 2008.  At that time, Kyle assured us he had just recently sent the images from the Dec 30th and Jan 7th dives to the FBI, but had never received a response from them.
 
We later found that to be false.
 
Also at that time, Beth's brother saw the images Kyle had shared with us - but none of the detail he shared later.

We compiled the images Kyle presented us, along with his opinions and the facts surrounding the sequence of events regarding that fishing cage.  Kyle stated he would be getting in touch with Beth Holloway.
 
We later found out that never happened.

At this time, Kyle shared with us the broadcast networks he had approached in February, in an attempt to sell these images to the highest bidder.
 
This didn't concern us greatly at that time - as we were under the impression US law enforcement and Natalee's family had already been made aware of their find.
 
Approximately May 2008 Kyle began dodging questions for details (we had asked for names of Aruban police and divers to be included in our documentation of these events), hedging on moving forward with this, and then he completely disappeared from our board.
 
During that time, we learned Kyle had never contacted Beth, or Dave, or the FBI with this information.
 
We put our original plan into motion - that of presenting this information in a clear and concise manner, and we sent it to Beth Holloway.
 
Beth was disturbed, needed time to digest the information, and wanted to share it with someone she trusts.
 
When Tim Miller was returning to Aruba this past fall, Beth gave us permission to release this information publicly.
 
At that point, we gave it to John Kelly, Carmen Adams with the FBI, and got it ready for public consumption.
 
The next step was to publish this information at our blog.
 
One of our members felt we were betraying Kyle in doing so, contacted him, and he re-surfaced at our site with threats of litigation against us - stating this was his "intellectual property" and we could not use it.
 
That of course concerned us greatly - as none of us could afford to be sued.
 
He also stated at that time, Luis Shaefer had just recently sold the rights of the video of these images to a broadcast company for the purposes of a documentary.
 
We contacted legal counsel and were advised to keep our distance from any Persistence crew member, in the face of potential obstruction/accessory charges.
 
At this point, one of our members decided to brace for the possibility of civil litigation, resigned from our membership to protect it from same, and posted what he knows to be factual at SM.
 
Kyle did tell us human remains were found in that fish cage.
 
Kyle did tell us about John Silvetti's intent to open an office on the island of Aruba, to enable him ease in conducting business in South America, and Aruba.
 
Kyle also told us of John's absolute refusal to give that fish cage and its contents any credence - before even it was inspected on Jan 7th.
 
Kyle told us in no uncertain terms that Tim Miller and Dateline were abruptly removed from the Persistence on Dec 30, resulting in only Persistence crew being aboard between that date and the Jan 7 dive of the Arubans.
 
Nothing that was posted at SM by kermit was incorrect, out of context, or in any way false.
 
Regards,
 
Former Natalee's Freebirds Administrator

Natalee and her family deserve justice - and we will not let up until they have it!

http://scaredmonkeys.net/index.php?topic=4269.msg603349#msg603349
 


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #797 1/30/09 -
Post by: bastibro on January 31, 2009, 07:18:10 PM
With my own eyes I have seen Bastibro's posts at BNH and CnG. 

Did you Klaas? Well, show me one post from me at BNH and show everyone that i`m a liar!!!
I`m sure you can`t. I also didn`t aspect this from you ::MonkeyNoNo::
But hey, that`s how we get to know eachother, i guess . .

And Magnolia, maybe you should get back to knit some goat-wool socks, that`s what you`re real good at ::MonkeyHaHa::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #797 1/30/09 -
Post by: Keepthefaith on January 31, 2009, 07:19:48 PM
With my own eyes I have seen Bastibro's posts at BNH and CnG. 

Did you Klaas? Well, show me one post from me at BNH and show everyone that i`m a liar!!!
I`m sure you can`t. I also didn`t aspect this from you ::MonkeyNoNo::
But hey, that`s how we get to know eachother, i guess . .

And Magnolia, maybe you should get back to knit some goat-wool socks, that`s what you`re real good at ::MonkeyHaHa::

Keep attacking Bastian.That's all you have?


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #797 1/30/09 -
Post by: Tamikosmom on January 31, 2009, 07:21:08 PM
With my own eyes I have seen Bastibro's posts at BNH and CnG. 

 ::MonkeyShocked::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #797 1/30/09 -
Post by: San on January 31, 2009, 07:23:29 PM
These are the perpetrators in this case:

(http://i272.photobucket.com/albums/jj176/bastibro/Kalpoe/FFFFFFFFFFFF.jpg)

Caps, OE and even Kermit were/are just trying to get to the truth.
The problem is that some people having difficulties to stay humble and that they enjoy the fact that some people make them to important, unfortunately(and i exclude Kyle here) ::MonkeyWink::



1.Kermit-posted nothing but the truth backed up by the Freebirds,as well as Kyle!
2.Kyle-Potentially an accessory to obstruction of justice.Backed up by his own words,as well as actions.
3.CapsLockWizard-Has posted many false statements regarding this case!

And you call Kermit the fraud! ::MonkeyLaugh::

Kyle(OE)

"I haven't seen Kermit post anything untrue presented as factual.  He's expressed his opinion, been taken out of context and misunderstood a few times, but he's pretty spot on as far as facts are concerned."

Kyle is vouching for Kermit in his own words Bastibro.What say you??
KTF...I'm sure Bastibro will be right back He just had to go ask someone how to answer... ::MonkeyWink::

I haven't seen anyone challenge Kermit's post's with any fact's or substance.I will stand with the frog all day! ::MonkeyCool::

I haven't seen one spec of evidence posted that Kermit is lying.  People say I have seen.  What haven they actually seen and why aren't they posting it.  Obviously they are speaking to someone who was a Freebird (LEAK).  Post the damn proof if they have it.  They won't because they don't have it and if they do post something at this time do you think I am going to trust what they post after all that was said and done.   COWARDS.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #797 1/30/09 -
Post by: always 1 on January 31, 2009, 07:23:30 PM
SO, hows Brinkmans investigation going?  Or was that just a bunch of hot air?

Appears to have been hot air or stopped in it's tracks.  ::MonkeyRoll::



Stopped in it's track!!

You are really feared/respected Klaas.  Hey ... Tamikosmom has nightmares regarding the "red botton".

  ::MonkeyShocked::

Janet


What's a red botton????

A red botton is what is awarded to the monkey with the highest number of inane posts at the end of each year.
Hmmm, I dont know you very well, when I see your avi, I think of the beautiful post you made to Peaches when she left our world.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #797 1/30/09 -
Post by: Artcolley on January 31, 2009, 07:23:47 PM
With my own eyes I have seen Bastibro's posts at BNH and CnG. 

Did you Klaas? Well, show me one post from me at BNH and show everyone that i`m a liar!!!
I`m sure you can`t. I also didn`t aspect this from you ::MonkeyNoNo::
But hey, that`s how we get to know eachother, i guess . .

And Magnolia, maybe you should get back to knit some goat-wool socks, that`s what you`re real good at ::MonkeyHaHa::

Wow!!!  Goat Wool Socks? I KNEW I liked Magnolia!!! She must be a very talented woman! Those are gorgeous...better known as Cashmere or Mohair , as I am sure you know, Bastibro

BTW,What are YOUR talents? ::MonkeyLaugh::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #797 1/30/09 -
Post by: klaasend on January 31, 2009, 07:24:39 PM
http://www.sacramentopress.com/headline/2601/HPI_in_Aruba_In_Search_of_Natalee_Holloway_Part_1

HPI in Aruba: In Search of Natalee Holloway Part 1
by Paul Roberts, published on January 20, 2009 at 7:07PM
Storyline: Paul Dale Roberts: Chronicles of a Ghostwriter/Ghosthunter  Community Tags: dale holloway natalee paul roberts
To see pictures from Aruba, please click on this link:
http://s459.photobucket.com/albums/qq319/HPI_International/HPIAruba/
Now, are you ready for the story? You are? Cool, let's go...

This is the start of my vacation. The day is 12 January 2009. I am headed for Aruba. I stop at Shannon 'Ms. Macabre' McCabe's home, she has offered to drive me to the airport. I tell Shannon, that is really nice that you will drive me to Oakland. She exclaims...Oakland? I thought you were flying out of Sacramento? Paul: No, I said Oakland. Shannon: I can't go to Oakland, I am sorry, I thought you were flying out of Sacramento. Paul: Don't worry about it Shannon, I can get to Oakland by myself. Shannon: I am really sorry man. Paul: Don't sweat it, just make sure to watch my dogs HPI and Pika. Rukesh Kumar, my neighbor will be watching them too, I am glad you and Rukesh have met. Shannon: Don't worry about the dogs Paul, I will even walk them!

Now you are probably wondering why I am headed over to Aruba. I am headed over to Aruba for pleasure and to investigate the disappearance of Natalee Holloway.

Quick History Lesson on Aruba:
The wind-swept island of Aruba was discovered and claimed for Spain in 1499, later acquired by the Dutch in 1636. Aruba was once part of the Netherlands Antilles, but they withdrew and subsequently became an independent member of the kingdom of the Netherlands. At one time oil refining and even gold mining was the major industry in Aruba, but when tourists discovered this island, things for Arubians changed and it changed for the better. This sunshiny place of balmy perfect weather, sandy beaches, duty-free shopping has one of the most fascinating ecosystems on the planet, is surrounded by the warm, aquamarine waters of the Caribbean Sea. Yes, Aruba is paradise.

How Am I Getting There and How Will I Return?
12 Jan: Flight 90 Jet Blue Oakland to New York
13 Jan: Flight 755 Jet Blue New York to Aruba
(Through the Bermuda Triangle)
19 Jan: Flight 744 Jet Blue Aruba to Boston
19 Jan: Flight 477 Jet Blue Boston to Oakland
The Ghost Tracker (my vehicle) is parked at the Oakland International Airport - Economy Parking N6.

Where Will I Be Staying?
Talk of the Town Hotel and Beach Club Room 106

On my way to Aruba, I am cramped in with an older couple. The older guy is right next to me and he is elbowing me throughout the whole trip. Later in the flight, he takes off his shoes and socks and starts fiddling around with his feet. The thoughts in my head were unimaginable. I did everything in my power to hold down my breakfast. I was so happy arriving to Aruba and getting as far away as possible from this guy. When the jet landed, they started playing the Beach Boy's Kokomo song.

The next thing is the fun part, negotiating with taxi drivers on their prices. Finally found a taxi driver with somewhat of a reasonable price. $15.00 cash to get from the airport to my hotel. What the? It was practically an 8 minute ride. Since the taxi driver was not too friendly, I stiffed him a tip. Man, this was one grouchy taxi driver, nice taxi drivers get tips, grouchy ones don't get anything.

I love my hotel, you can feel the island breeze, a cute outdoor patio and bar, beautiful swimming pool and the interior of my hotel room is everything I wanted. Yes, I can see why this hotel is called The Talk of the Town. Big price though, over a thousand bucks for 6 nights. Ouch! Oh well, I am on vacation.

On the first day, I am exhausted and jet lagged, but my curiosity is at an all time high. I want to see the town. On this day, I would check out the Marketplace, Seaport Casino and Parlament di Aruba.

This Tuesday night, I had the pleasure of meeting a gorgeous dark haired Colombian girl named Sandra Osono. Sandra has given me many details of her country in Columbia and why she has moved to Aruba. Sandra was a pleasure to talk to and I will be keeping in touch with Sandra. This night, I would get lost in my thoughts as I listened to the reggae and salsa music at a club called Mambo Jambo and sipping on my pina colada.

It is now Wednesday and I would stop over at the Beach Bar Havana aka The New Havana Beach Bar and Restaurants. This is right across the street from my hotel and to my surprise, the Arubian women are parading around this beach without any tops. I instantly thought, just perhaps, the Arubian women might be poor and are not able to afford a full piece bathing suit, so minus the tops. Perhaps, when I get to America, I will start up a charity for these poor women, so they can have full piece bathing suits and they will not have to walk around the beach without their tops. I felt saddened at their plight.

Today, I would spend much of the day souvenir shopping and when I got hungry I would have some beef chop suey at the Kowloon Restaurant. In a location near the Kowloon Restaurant, I met Sasha (not her real name). She asked why I was walking around taking notes. I explained to her that I have heard stories about a blonde phantom woman that walks the beach of Aruba and some people think it is Natalee Holloway.

I explained that last night, I did go to the beach late at night. A beach location that some people believe that Natalee was taken to and attempted to get some EVPs. Some of the questions I have asked are: Natalee are you here? Natalee if you are here, speak to me. So far, I have not gathered any EVPs. I will continue trying.

Sasha laughed. Sasha: You are a ghosthunter, this is funny. There are many ghosts here in Aruba and many stories. The blonde phantom woman, is probably the Lady of the Mist. The Lady of the Mist is a ghost of a woman, that may have drowned. If you want to know how Natalee died, I know some of Joran's (Joran van der Sloot) circle of friends. I was told that Joran placed some drugs in her drinks and when he got her out to the beach, she went into convulsions. He had one of his friends drop her out in the ocean. Joran was scared when Natalee went into convulsions, because it was his drugs that killed her. Joran could only think of getting rid of any evidence and that was disposing of the body. That is why Joran did not call the cops, he is a coward.

Paul: Sasha, why haven't you told the cops? Sasha: The cops already know and they do nothing. I don't want to be involved and please do not use my name in your article, not my real name, you can call me Sasha, that is okay. Paul: Wow! I was expecting to just try and get some EVPs, I didn't realize I was going to talk to a person that has some inside knowledge.

After my meeting with Sasha, I watched her as she walked into a crowd of people at the local mall and vanished. I can only wonder what other information, I will find while in Aruba?

As I walked back to my hotel, I sort of was in a trance after talking with Sasha. A Mercedes pulls up and a dark haired Arubian girl stops the Mercedes and opens the door and tells me to get in! As I prepared to get in, a horn blows and I realize I was merely daydreaming. The person blowing the horn, was a large old woman in an old beat up Chevy. I was daydreaming the James Bond (Quantum of Solice) scene.

Hey, what do you expect? I am in paradise, the island of dreams...I can daydream a little bit. But, I know that this vacation is becoming an adventure and the night has not even arrived yet.

Okay, the night is here. It's Wednesday night. It's time to get friendly. It's time to interview people. My first interviewee is: Vasilisa Henriquez. Vasilisa verifies the story that Sasha told me and doesn't mind that I use her real name in my article. Vasilisa looks like a model and she has this sweet Jamaican accent. Instead of calling me Paul, she calls me Pol. I like that. Vasilisa Henriquez also tells me that Joran called his father when Natalee supposingly died. It was Joran's father that took Natalee on the boat and dumped her body. This is the story that has been told repeatedly here in Aruba


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #797 1/30/09 -
Post by: Seamonkey on January 31, 2009, 07:24:48 PM
(http://i446.photobucket.com/albums/qq188/IndigoBunny/bobbleheadco1.gif)

Copy,paste,copy,paste,copy,paste!

Back to the hidey-hole.HEY!Back to the Hide-holey.Hey!!!! ::MonkeyDance::

hehe  heee hawww round dem up...rawhideeeeee!! ::MonkeyDance::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #797 1/30/09 -
Post by: Magnolia on January 31, 2009, 07:24:52 PM
With my own eyes I have seen Bastibro's posts at BNH and CnG. 

Did you Klaas? Well, show me one post from me at BNH and show everyone that i`m a liar!!!
I`m sure you can`t. I also didn`t aspect this from you ::MonkeyNoNo::
But hey, that`s how we get to know eachother, i guess . .

And Magnolia, maybe you should get back to knit some goat-wool socks, that`s what you`re real good at ::MonkeyHaHa::


I believe that is call angora, Bastibro.  You are still a liar!


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #797 1/30/09 -
Post by: klaasend on January 31, 2009, 07:26:42 PM
With my own eyes I have seen Bastibro's posts at BNH and CnG. 

 ::MonkeyShocked::

Janet - I have many helpers and many eyes  ::MonkeyCool::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #797 1/30/09 -
Post by: San on January 31, 2009, 07:28:34 PM

I think his shift for the disruptions was over anyway.

I don't think so.  It's still early grab your popcorn and a seat.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #797 1/30/09 -
Post by: Tamikosmom on January 31, 2009, 07:30:27 PM
SO, hows Brinkmans investigation going?  Or was that just a bunch of hot air?

Appears to have been hot air or stopped in it's tracks.  ::MonkeyRoll::



Stopped in it's track!!

You are really feared/respected Klaas.  Hey ... Tamikosmom has nightmares regarding the "red botton".

  ::MonkeyShocked::

Janet


What's a red botton????

OOPS!!! My mistake.  S/B button not ... botton.

 ::MonkeyHaHa::

Janet


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #797 1/30/09 -
Post by: Keepthefaith on January 31, 2009, 07:30:52 PM
These are the perpetrators in this case:

(http://i272.photobucket.com/albums/jj176/bastibro/Kalpoe/FFFFFFFFFFFF.jpg)

Caps, OE and even Kermit were/are just trying to get to the truth.
The problem is that some people having difficulties to stay humble and that they enjoy the fact that some people make them to important, unfortunately(and i exclude Kyle here) ::MonkeyWink::



1.Kermit-posted nothing but the truth backed up by the Freebirds,as well as Kyle!
2.Kyle-Potentially an accessory to obstruction of justice.Backed up by his own words,as well as actions.
3.CapsLockWizard-Has posted many false statements regarding this case!

And you call Kermit the fraud! ::MonkeyLaugh::

Kyle(OE)

"I haven't seen Kermit post anything untrue presented as factual.  He's expressed his opinion, been taken out of context and misunderstood a few times, but he's pretty spot on as far as facts are concerned."

Care to debate Kyle's own words Bastian??


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #797 1/30/09 -
Post by: hotping on January 31, 2009, 07:31:20 PM
(http://i446.photobucket.com/albums/qq188/IndigoBunny/bobbleheadco1.gif)

Copy,paste,copy,paste,copy,paste!

Back to the hidey-hole.HEY!Back to the Hide-holey.Hey!!!! ::MonkeyDance::

hehe  heee hawww round dem up...rawhideeeeee!! ::MonkeyDance::
Round em up Move em Out... Rawhide..  ::MonkeyWink::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #797 1/30/09 -
Post by: always 1 on January 31, 2009, 07:31:46 PM
SO, hows Brinkmans investigation going?  Or was that just a bunch of hot air?

Appears to have been hot air or stopped in it's tracks.  ::MonkeyRoll::



Stopped in it's track!!

You are really feared/respected Klaas.  Hey ... Tamikosmom has nightmares regarding the "red botton".

  ::MonkeyShocked::

Janet


What's a red botton????

OOPS!!! My mistake.  S/B button not ... botton.

 ::MonkeyHaHa::

Janet
I knew that, I was just playing with you, trying to lighten the mood, lal la la


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #797 1/30/09 -
Post by: Tamikosmom on January 31, 2009, 07:33:59 PM
With my own eyes I have seen Bastibro's posts at BNH and CnG. 

 ::MonkeyShocked::

Janet - I have many helpers and many eyes  ::MonkeyCool::

Chilling!!  Very Chilling!!

 ::MonkeyShocked::

Where have I been?  What have I done?   What did I say?

 ::MonkeyWaa::

Janet


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #797 1/30/09 -
Post by: San on January 31, 2009, 07:34:26 PM
With my own eyes I have seen Bastibro's posts at BNH and CnG. 

Did you Klaas? Well, show me one post from me at BNH and show everyone that i`m a liar!!!
I`m sure you can`t. I also didn`t aspect this from you ::MonkeyNoNo::
But hey, that`s how we get to know eachother, i guess . .

And Magnolia, maybe you should get back to knit some goat-wool socks, that`s what you`re real good at ::MonkeyHaHa::

Maybe you need to go hang out with your loser friend ******* a little more.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #797 1/30/09 -
Post by: Magnolia on January 31, 2009, 07:35:25 PM

I think his shift for the disruptions was over anyway.

I don't think so.  It's still early grab your popcorn and a seat.

I 'll knit while I wait. ::MonkeyLaugh:: ::MonkeyLaugh:: ::MonkeyLaugh::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #797 1/30/09 -
Post by: Seamonkey on January 31, 2009, 07:35:33 PM
With my own eyes I have seen Bastibro's posts at BNH and CnG. 

 ::MonkeyShocked::

Janet - I have many helpers and many eyes  ::MonkeyCool::

(http://i446.photobucket.com/albums/qq188/IndigoBunny/bigeyes.gif)(http://i446.photobucket.com/albums/qq188/IndigoBunny/bigeyes.gif)(http://i446.photobucket.com/albums/qq188/IndigoBunny/bigeyes.gif)


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #797 1/30/09 -
Post by: Tamikosmom on January 31, 2009, 07:36:33 PM
With my own eyes I have seen Bastibro's posts at BNH and CnG. 

Did you Klaas? Well, show me one post from me at BNH and show everyone that i`m a liar!!!
I`m sure you can`t. I also didn`t aspect this from you ::MonkeyNoNo::
But hey, that`s how we get to know eachother, i guess . .

And Magnolia, maybe you should get back to knit some goat-wool socks, that`s what you`re real good at ::MonkeyHaHa::

Wow!!!  Goat Wool Socks? I KNEW I liked Magnolia!!! She must be a very talented woman! Those are gorgeous...better known as Cashmere or Mohair , as I am sure you know, Bastibro

BTW,What are YOUR talents? ::MonkeyLaugh::

Tamikosmom is speculating.  Just give her a little time.

 ::MonkeyCool::

Janet


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #797 1/30/09 -
Post by: San on January 31, 2009, 07:36:53 PM

I think his shift for the disruptions was over anyway.

I don't think so.  It's still early grab your popcorn and a seat.

I 'll knit while I wait. ::MonkeyLaugh:: ::MonkeyLaugh:: ::MonkeyLaugh::

 ::MonkeyHaHa:: ::MonkeyHaHa::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #797 1/30/09 -
Post by: Tamikosmom on January 31, 2009, 07:38:00 PM

I think his shift for the disruptions was over anyway.

I don't think so.  It's still early grab your popcorn and a seat.

I 'll knit while I wait. ::MonkeyLaugh:: ::MonkeyLaugh:: ::MonkeyLaugh::

 ::cartwheel::

Magnolia ... you are the greatest!!!

Janet


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #797 1/30/09 -
Post by: Buckeye on January 31, 2009, 07:38:33 PM

I think his shift for the disruptions was over anyway.

I don't think so.  It's still early grab your popcorn and a seat.

I 'll knit while I wait. ::MonkeyLaugh:: ::MonkeyLaugh:: ::MonkeyLaugh::

 ::MonkeyHaHa:: ::MonkeyHaHa::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #797 1/30/09 -
Post by: Artcolley on January 31, 2009, 07:38:37 PM

I think his shift for the disruptions was over anyway.

I don't think so.  It's still early grab your popcorn and a seat.

I 'll knit while I wait. ::MonkeyLaugh:: ::MonkeyLaugh:: ::MonkeyLaugh::

I will grab my knitting bag and join you  ::MonkeyHaHa::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #797 1/30/09 -
Post by: texasmom on January 31, 2009, 07:39:02 PM

I think his shift for the disruptions was over anyway.

I don't think so.  It's still early grab your popcorn and a seat.

I 'll knit while I wait. ::MonkeyLaugh:: ::MonkeyLaugh:: ::MonkeyLaugh::

::MonkeyDance:: ::cartwheel:: ::MonkeyDance:: ::cartwheel::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #797 1/30/09 -
Post by: wreck on January 31, 2009, 07:39:04 PM
I've TRIED to be civil. The gloves are about to come off.  ::MonkeyNoNo::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #797 1/30/09 -
Post by: 2NJSons_Mom on January 31, 2009, 07:41:08 PM

I think his shift for the disruptions was over anyway.

I don't think so.  It's still early grab your popcorn and a seat.

I 'll knit while I wait. ::MonkeyLaugh:: ::MonkeyLaugh:: ::MonkeyLaugh::

You can hand them out and tell them all to put a sock in it!!!!!!!!


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #797 1/30/09 -
Post by: Blue Moon on January 31, 2009, 07:41:54 PM
Has anyone heard of or done any research on Casey Cundieff (or his dad) from Captain Elliott's?  Has it already been discussed here that Schaeffer had purchased Aruban businesses? 
Can you fill us in? I think you have told us that you have some personal knowledge of John and/or Louis. I would be interested in pursuing ANY angle you might feel relevant.

I have no personal knowledge of anyone at SM or the Persistence or the family.  I read the article that lifesong brought forward a few pages back.  I had a big "lightbulb" moment when I read about the connection of Schaefer to purchasing the fishing boat company.  I thought that could explain the Caps connection and how Caps would know where to dive to see the cage.  Maybe Caps is one of the fishing boat company employees or owner.  Or maybe you have all already discussed that and I missed it.  I'm not trying to "out" Caps.  I was just very surprised to read that Schaefer bought those Aruban businesses around the same time as the sea search.

I have to go take care of the real "Iris" and her friends now. (mucking stalls and riding).  I'll check in later.

I don't think that would be Caps connection to Schaeffer.  Hotshot said she is the one who introduced Caps to Schaefer.   I do find it curious what was happening during the time Schaeffer and Salvetti decided to take that boat trip to Aruba.  What with all the goings on here in the U.S. with bankrupties, stock tanking.  Alot was happening with that company and then he ups and goes to Aruba looking for Natalee.  I am extremely grateful as I am sure the family is that they made that trip but the outcome I am sure was not what anyone expected.  Any connections to Aruba to me sends out bad vibs and should make anyone suspicious of their actual goal in the search.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #797 1/30/09 -
Post by: Seamonkey on January 31, 2009, 07:43:04 PM
I've TRIED to be civil. The gloves are about to come off.  ::MonkeyNoNo::

I have taken up the new hobby (new for ME)  of tryin to sit on my hands, but is becomin a struggle lol *down hands.. I say..DOwn!!!* Oh well, baby steps baby steps i guess lol


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #797 1/30/09 -
Post by: bastibro on January 31, 2009, 07:45:15 PM
With my own eyes I have seen Bastibro's posts at BNH and CnG. 

Did you Klaas? Well, show me one post from me at BNH and show everyone that i`m a liar!!!
I`m sure you can`t. I also didn`t aspect this from you ::MonkeyNoNo::
But hey, that`s how we get to know eachother, i guess . .

And Magnolia, maybe you should get back to knit some goat-wool socks, that`s what you`re real good at ::MonkeyHaHa::

Maybe you need to go hang out with your loser friend ******* a little more.

Did you hear yourself say that? WOW those are big words for a little girl . . ::MonkeyShocked::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #797 1/30/09 -
Post by: Tamikosmom on January 31, 2009, 07:46:22 PM

Kyle`s own words were ripped off their context by her. That`s my answer to you and to Janet.

sincerely, Bastian.



KYLE KINGMAN - IN HIS OWN WORDS

oceanexploration
Re: Natalee Case Discussion #776 11/19-08
« Reply #679 on: November 20, 2008, 10:10:15 PM »


I haven't seen Kermit post anything untrue presented as factual.  He's expressed his opinion, been taken out of context and misunderstood a few times, but he's pretty spot on as far as facts are concerned.

http://scaredmonkeys.net/index.php?topic=4153.msg551217;topicseen#msg551217


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #797 1/30/09 -
Post by: San on January 31, 2009, 07:47:13 PM
With my own eyes I have seen Bastibro's posts at BNH and CnG. 

Did you Klaas? Well, show me one post from me at BNH and show everyone that i`m a liar!!!
I`m sure you can`t. I also didn`t aspect this from you ::MonkeyNoNo::
But hey, that`s how we get to know eachother, i guess . .

And Magnolia, maybe you should get back to knit some goat-wool socks, that`s what you`re real good at ::MonkeyHaHa::

Maybe you need to go hang out with your loser friend ******* a little more.

Did you hear yourself say that? WOW those are big words for a little girl . . ::MonkeyShocked::


Sit down son your panties are showing.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #797 1/30/09 -
Post by: Tamikosmom on January 31, 2009, 07:49:08 PM
Has anyone heard of or done any research on Casey Cundieff (or his dad) from Captain Elliott's?  Has it already been discussed here that Schaeffer had purchased Aruban businesses? 
Can you fill us in? I think you have told us that you have some personal knowledge of John and/or Louis. I would be interested in pursuing ANY angle you might feel relevant.

I have no personal knowledge of anyone at SM or the Persistence or the family.  I read the article that lifesong brought forward a few pages back.  I had a big "lightbulb" moment when I read about the connection of Schaefer to purchasing the fishing boat company.  I thought that could explain the Caps connection and how Caps would know where to dive to see the cage.  Maybe Caps is one of the fishing boat company employees or owner.  Or maybe you have all already discussed that and I missed it.  I'm not trying to "out" Caps.  I was just very surprised to read that Schaefer bought those Aruban businesses around the same time as the sea search.

I have to go take care of the real "Iris" and her friends now. (mucking stalls and riding).  I'll check in later.

I don't think that would be Caps connection to Schaeffer.  Hotshot said she is the one who introduced Caps to Schaefer.   I do find it curious what was happening during the time Schaeffer and Salvetti decided to take that boat trip to Aruba.  What with all the goings on here in the U.S. with bankrupties, stock tanking.  Alot was happening with that company and then he ups and goes to Aruba looking for Natalee.  I am extremely grateful as I am sure the family is that they made that trip but the outcome I am sure was not what anyone expected.  Any connections to Aruba to me sends out bad vibs and should make anyone suspicious of their actual goal in the search.


Hotshot
Re: Natalee Case Discussion #792 1/9/09 -
« Reply #835 on: January 13, 2009, 10:04:13 AM »


I dont need to prove things to you.  I told you I got CAPS to silvetti, I got CAPS to DAVE.....  then later on CAPS gave me Silvettis number.  That is all there is to it.  I didnt inject myself, I got them in touch with who they needed to get in touch with.  Not a big deal. 

http://scaredmonkeys.net/index.php?topic=4363.msg624464#msg624464


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #797 1/30/09 -
Post by: Tamikosmom on January 31, 2009, 07:50:33 PM
I've TRIED to be civil. The gloves are about to come off.  ::MonkeyNoNo::

WAIT!!!  Tamikomom is still speculating ...

Janet


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #797 1/30/09 -
Post by: Blonde on January 31, 2009, 07:50:56 PM
ARUBA COVER-UP

(http://i18.photobucket.com/albums/b104/Blondeonahd/persistence/PersistenceHansMosandRichardson.jpg)



Idstlou said: ”The footage WAS turned over to the FBI immediately.”http://scaredmonkeys.net/index.php?topic=4340.500
 Idstlou said: ”Sceen shots were sent daily as intructed by the FBI agents in charge, and the footage was turned over at the first opportunity.” http://scaredmonkeys.net/index.php?topic=4340.540
Idstlou said: “They were working with two FBI agents from Barbados. The footage was turned over to them.”http://scaredmonkeys.net/index.php?topic=4340.560

Idstlou said: “I know that there were members of Quantico on board. http://scaredmonkeys.net/index.php?topic=4340.580

"Klye:  I did not give the information to the FBI and I'm unaware of anyone relaying the possibility to them.
pg 39http://scaredmonkeys.net/index.php?topic=4340.760

Quote from: ldstlou on January 02, 2009, 05:46:43 PM
I stated that posters have said part of your credibility stems from taking down a president and working beside two others. I simply asked them to elaborate. You don't have to tell me a thing if you don't want to.

Why do you want personal information on Kermit?
http://scaredmonkeys.net/index.php?topic=4340.420




POOP SUIT ALERT



LEAK said: "This comment was made by Jug during a recent phone conversation:
All of the stuff that Kermit posted
<snip>
FBI did not know about it..."


Kyle was contacted by the FBI AFTER Freebirds sent the evidence/information to them.http://scaredmonkeys.net/index.php?topic=4340.420



CAPS HAS 4 COMPUTERS:
My brain cell + 4 Computers are thinking in all possible scenarios,
http://scaredmonkeys.net/index.php?topic=2539.120

CAPS POSTED:
Got an email today from DH, why took so long?
http://scaredmonkeys.net/index.php?topic=2539.160


I would like to know why on February 7, Caps is talking about this witness on scared monkeys,
this is the witness that would only talk to John through his lawyer, fear of reprisal, but yet Caps feels it's okay to tell the world about him on February 7!








Really Kermit? Really? as my brother would say!
You are going to keep this charade up?

Because I have seen what I believe to be irrefutable evidence that you posted pics of a family member of yours here at SM and insinuated that those pics were of yourself...correct me please if I am wrong on this please.

If this is true, did your the family member know you were doing this and approve?

If I am wrong, I apologize, because then indeed I have been mislead by those trying to discredit you.
But if I am not wrong, then your integrity has been compromised.
If I am not wrong, then you did the misleading.
If I am not wrong, and you are capable of posting pics of a family family on a public forum and insinuating they are pics of yourself, then you are capable of taking Kyle's words out of context and creating a conspiracy theory involving the crew members of the Persistence, people who devoted a lot of their own time, energy and money to search for Natalee at the request of Tim Miler and Dave Holloway.
If I am not wrong, then I believe you are also capable of falsely accusing people of assisting the ALE by sending them info from the pro-Natalee boards with no proof other than "your word".

All of this is just my humble opinion of course.

I do hope that I am wrong.

I am off to the Travel Show.
No Justice for Natalee, No Tourists for Aruba!

LDSLOU,

You've made it abundantly clear that you believe Kermit is a fraud.  I respect your right to that opinion.  Now could you sjow the same respect for those of us to believe her to actually discuss the case by scrolling past what you don't believe and stop disruption all discussions other than how you feel about Kermit?

Not that it matters and only for the record: I always believed that the frog was a fraud to.
To me the latest developments confirm my suspicions. JMHO ::MonkeyNoNo::

bastibro are you still posting at BNH.
Just asking...


Hello Blonde, I`m a member at Bring Natalee Home, just never took the time to post anything there.
What`s your point?  TIA

BTW Blonde ::MonkeyEek:: Are U still talking to Reality on the phone?
Just asking ::MonkeyWink::

NO,Just that one time about the body in bag picture. ::MonkeyWink::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #797 1/30/09 -
Post by: Blue Moon on January 31, 2009, 07:51:46 PM
These are the perpetrators in this case:

(http://i272.photobucket.com/albums/jj176/bastibro/Kalpoe/FFFFFFFFFFFF.jpg)

Caps, OE and even Kermit were/are just trying to get to the truth.
The problem is that some people having difficulties to stay humble and that they enjoy the fact that some people make them to important, unfortunately(and i exclude Kyle here) ::MonkeyWink::



Bastibro, I wouldn't exclude Kyle in the least.  HE is the one who opened this can of worms. HE is the one who got diarrhea of the mouth and took those pictures and exposed the final act of this case by not turning over ALL information concerning the cage to the FBI and the family.  It wasn't his job (I am sure I will hear those words before the night is over) then he should have keep his big fat mouth shut and butt out of this.  But he didn't and now no one will ever know what was in that cage.  He said it was human remains, the FBI tested for DNA.  So who's remains were they.  If not Natalee then some other family is suffering the same fate as Beth and Dave.

I do totally agree the X's on each of those faces is what this is all about.  And unfortunately Aruba will never do what's right to bring Justice for Natalee. JMO


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #797 1/30/09 -
Post by: Sleuth on January 31, 2009, 07:53:26 PM
San, you don't pull any punches, and our Wreck is removing his gloves..


Speaking of punches, did you see that ad I'm in tomorrow - I get punched and spill my coffee..

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=79tMMFja-Fw


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #797 1/30/09 -
Post by: Blue Moon on January 31, 2009, 07:54:00 PM
SO, hows Brinkmans investigation going?  Or was that just a bunch of hot air?

Brinkman probably at this moment belongs the the CnG site.  Appears everyone does, why not him?   ::MonkeyCool::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #797 1/30/09 -
Post by: Blue Moon on January 31, 2009, 07:56:07 PM
It took me several attempts to login (kept getting message that I didn't exist
javascript:void(0); ::MonkeyShocked::, but knew that was not correct) I seldom post
because I do not usually have time and everyone else does a much better job at expressing themselves (usually saying what I am feeling or thinking). I got bumped off the forum and couldn't get back in for a while, so apologize that this post is after the fact.

I just wrote , deleted, then re-wrote what I wanted to say and I still can't come close to expressing my thoughts when it comes to Idstlou's posts, so I am going to simply give up. I will say, Kermit, it was a difficult decision you made to share info with us. It took a person of great character and strength to do what was right. If it were possible, I would hug you and thank you in person. I am so sorry that you have been treated so poorly by some. In my book, you are a true hero. Thank you.

Since I seldom post and won't suffer if I am banned or reprimanded , I will say to Idstlou, "Enough!"  Be silent long enough to read what others have shared with you, take the time to READ EVERY WORD. Then, step away from the forum(from reading or posting)  until you can distance yourself from emotion and evaluate the information the info that  has been offered to you. TAKE YOUR TIME to really think it through, then return, so there can be an open discussion and all sides can be shared.You may be surprised at the amount of respect you will garner once emotions are out of the picture. You may not change your mind, nor anyone else's but at least all will be heard.


Great post.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #797 1/30/09 -
Post by: klaasend on January 31, 2009, 07:56:13 PM
With my own eyes I have seen Bastibro's posts at BNH and CnG. 

Did you Klaas? Well, show me one post from me at BNH and show everyone that i`m a liar!!!
I`m sure you can`t. I also didn`t aspect this from you ::MonkeyNoNo::
But hey, that`s how we get to know eachother, i guess . .

And Magnolia, maybe you should get back to knit some goat-wool socks, that`s what you`re real good at ::MonkeyHaHa::

Maybe you need to go hang out with your loser friend ******* a little more.

Did you hear yourself say that? WOW those are big words for a little girl . . ::MonkeyShocked::


How do you know she's even a girl?


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #797 1/30/09 -
Post by: Tamikosmom on January 31, 2009, 07:56:22 PM
]Just asking[/color] ::MonkeyWink::


NO,Just that one time about the body in bag picture. ::MonkeyWink::
[/quote]

I did recollect correctly.

 ::cartwheel::

Janet

++++++





Blonde was open with the members of the Truth For Natalee forum when she conversed with Reality in regards to an issue.

What interests me more is that YOU WERE THERE!!!

Were you a guest?  Were you a member?  What was your nic?

This wannabe detective is speculating ...

Janet




Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #797 1/30/09 -
Post by: San on January 31, 2009, 07:57:29 PM
San, you don't pull any punches, and our Wreck is removing his gloves..


Speaking of punches, did you see that ad I'm in tomorrow - I get punched and spill my coffee..

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=79tMMFja-Fw

That's how I feel when I go to work  ::MonkeyHaHa::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #797 1/30/09 -
Post by: Tamikosmom on January 31, 2009, 07:58:18 PM

BTW Blonde ::MonkeyEek:: Are U still talking to Reality on the phone?
Just asking ::MonkeyWink::

NO,Just that one time about the body in bag picture. ::MonkeyWink::


I did recollect correctly.

 ::cartwheel::

Janet

++++++





Blonde was open with the members of the Truth For Natalee forum when she conversed with Reality in regards to an issue.

What interests me more is that YOU WERE THERE!!!

Were you a guest?  Were you a member?  What was your nic?

This wannabe detective is speculating ...

Janet


[/quote]


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #797 1/30/09 -
Post by: Tibrogargan on January 31, 2009, 07:59:43 PM
SO, hows Brinkmans investigation going?  Or was that just a bunch of hot air?

Appears to have been hot air or stopped in it's tracks.  ::MonkeyRoll::



Stopped in it's track!!

You are really feared/respected Klaas.  Hey ... Tamikosmom has nightmares regarding the "red botton".

  ::MonkeyShocked::

Janet


What's a red botton????

A red botton is what is awarded to the monkey with the highest number of inane posts at the end of each year.
Hmmm, I dont know you very well, when I see your avi, I think of the beautiful post you made to Peaches when she left our world.


We all have many facets to our personality. Peaches was wonderful human being and I admired her for her honesty, her humour, her commitment and her courage.

I can readily feel empathy and compassion for others and their situations, but I have great difficulty accepting that those who appear supportive of this forum and it’s leaders, can at the same time be posting 220+ posts at the forum set up to undermine and defame this forum, with a big percentage of these posts being copies of posts made here and pasted in the “Look what was just posted at SM” thread to be ridiculed, along with unkind posts about one of the mods here.

I endeavour to always be up front and truthful in my posts and I do tend to say things as I see them, but equating my comments here with what I felt at the loss of a dear Monkey friend and my personal beliefs is totally uncalled for in this thread.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #797 1/30/09 -
Post by: Tamikosmom on January 31, 2009, 08:00:57 PM
With my own eyes I have seen Bastibro's posts at BNH and CnG. 

Did you Klaas? Well, show me one post from me at BNH and show everyone that i`m a liar!!!
I`m sure you can`t. I also didn`t aspect this from you ::MonkeyNoNo::
But hey, that`s how we get to know eachother, i guess . .

And Magnolia, maybe you should get back to knit some goat-wool socks, that`s what you`re real good at ::MonkeyHaHa::

Maybe you need to go hang out with your loser friend ******* a little more.

Did you hear yourself say that? WOW those are big words for a little girl . . ::MonkeyShocked::


How do you know she's even a girl?

 ::MonkeyShocked::

San is a boy Monkey??

Janet



Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #797 1/30/09 -
Post by: Blue Moon on January 31, 2009, 08:02:35 PM
(http://i446.photobucket.com/albums/qq188/IndigoBunny/bobbleheadco1.gif)

 ::MonkeyLaugh:: ::MonkeyLaugh::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #797 1/30/09 -
Post by: Blue Moon on January 31, 2009, 08:03:48 PM
With my own eyes I have seen Bastibro's posts at BNH and CnG. 

Did you Klaas? Well, show me one post from me at BNH and show everyone that i`m a liar!!!
I`m sure you can`t. I also didn`t aspect this from you ::MonkeyNoNo::
But hey, that`s how we get to know eachother, i guess . .

And Magnolia, maybe you should get back to knit some goat-wool socks, that`s what you`re real good at ::MonkeyHaHa::


Uncalled for.  You are WAY out of line here.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #797 1/30/09 -
Post by: always 1 on January 31, 2009, 08:04:11 PM
SO, hows Brinkmans investigation going?  Or was that just a bunch of hot air?

Appears to have been hot air or stopped in it's tracks.  ::MonkeyRoll::



Stopped in it's track!!

You are really feared/respected Klaas.  Hey ... Tamikosmom has nightmares regarding the "red botton".

  ::MonkeyShocked::

Janet


What's a red botton????

A red botton is what is awarded to the monkey with the highest number of inane posts at the end of each year.
Hmmm, I dont know you very well, when I see your avi, I think of the beautiful post you made to Peaches when she left our world.


We all have many facets to our personality. Peaches was wonderful human being and I admired her for her honesty, her humour, her commitment and her courage.

I can readily feel empathy and compassion for others and their situations, but I have great difficulty accepting that those who appear supportive of this forum and it’s leaders, can at the same time be posting 220+ posts at the forum set up to undermine and defame this forum, with a big percentage of these posts being copies of posts made here and pasted in the “Look what was just posted at SM” thread to be ridiculed, along with unkind posts about one of the mods here.

I endeavour to always be up front and truthful in my posts and I do tend to say things as I see them, but equating my comments here with what I felt at the loss of a dear Monkey friend and my personal beliefs is totally uncalled for in this thread.

You took that post all wrong.  I meant that I thought you were a very kind person and I still do.  I never cut and pasted any thing from here in the C and G forum - never. 


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #797 1/30/09 -
Post by: bastibro on January 31, 2009, 08:05:36 PM
These are the perpetrators in this case:

(http://i272.photobucket.com/albums/jj176/bastibro/Kalpoe/FFFFFFFFFFFF.jpg)

Caps, OE and even Kermit were/are just trying to get to the truth.
The problem is that some people having difficulties to stay humble and that they enjoy the fact that some people make them to important, unfortunately(and i exclude Kyle here) ::MonkeyWink::



1.Kermit-posted nothing but the truth backed up by the Freebirds,as well as Kyle!
2.Kyle-Potentially an accessory to obstruction of justice.Backed up by his own words,as well as actions.
3.CapsLockWizard-Has posted many false statements regarding this case!

And you call Kermit the fraud! ::MonkeyLaugh::

Kyle`s own words were ripped off their context by her. That`s my answer to you and to Janet.

sincerely, Bastian.

(http://i272.photobucket.com/albums/jj176/bastibro/Natalee/2fp29beth2.jpg)

Oh, Bastibro, you are so lying your little head off.
I have seen you posting at BNH.
I registered there but they kicked me off because I never posted.
They would have kicked you to the curb too, if you had never posted.
All of the Freebirds have come here and stated that Kyle's post
were never taken out of context and were exactly as posted.


An outright LIE, that gives me the right to call you a LIAR Magnolia.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #797 1/30/09 -
Post by: Sleuth on January 31, 2009, 08:05:49 PM
San - LOL

It doesn't matter if a monkey is boy or girl, just as long as they are in it for the GIRL (Natalee).


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #797 1/30/09 -
Post by: Sleuth on January 31, 2009, 08:08:23 PM
Blue Moom - will you share some of that popcorn...


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #797 1/30/09 -
Post by: hotping on January 31, 2009, 08:09:31 PM
Blue Moom - will you share some of that popcorn...
  ::MonkeyHaHa::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #797 1/30/09 -
Post by: Tamikosmom on January 31, 2009, 08:10:49 PM
San - LOL

It doesn't matter if a monkey is boy or girl, just as long as they are in it for the GIRL (Natalee).

... but ... but ... I want to know.

 ::MonkeyWaa::

Janet


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #797 1/30/09 -
Post by: Seamonkey on January 31, 2009, 08:11:10 PM
San - LOL

It doesn't matter if a monkey is boy or girl, just as long as they are in it for the GIRL (Natalee).

 ::MonkeyDance::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #797 1/30/09 -
Post by: Magnolia on January 31, 2009, 08:11:56 PM
These are the perpetrators in this case:

(http://i272.photobucket.com/albums/jj176/bastibro/Kalpoe/FFFFFFFFFFFF.jpg)

Caps, OE and even Kermit were/are just trying to get to the truth.
The problem is that some people having difficulties to stay humble and that they enjoy the fact that some people make them to important, unfortunately(and i exclude Kyle here) ::MonkeyWink::



1.Kermit-posted nothing but the truth backed up by the Freebirds,as well as Kyle!
2.Kyle-Potentially an accessory to obstruction of justice.Backed up by his own words,as well as actions.
3.CapsLockWizard-Has posted many false statements regarding this case!

And you call Kermit the fraud! ::MonkeyLaugh::

Kyle`s own words were ripped off their context by her. That`s my answer to you and to Janet.

sincerely, Bastian.

(http://i272.photobucket.com/albums/jj176/bastibro/Natalee/2fp29beth2.jpg)

Oh, Bastibro, you are so lying your little head off.
I have seen you posting at BNH.
I registered there but they kicked me off because I never posted.
They would have kicked you to the curb too, if you had never posted.
All of the Freebirds have come here and stated that Kyle's post
were never taken out of context and were exactly as posted.


An outright LIE, that gives me the right to call you a LIAR Magnolia.

Put a goat wool sock in it Bastibro.
 Klaas and Blonde have seen you post there too.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #797 1/30/09 -
Post by: Tamikosmom on January 31, 2009, 08:13:25 PM
Blue Moom - will you share some of that popcorn...

No can do.  Blue Moon is sharing her popcorn with me and ... Magnolia is knitting me a sweat.

I feel so hinky all over.

 ::cartwheel::

Janet


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #797 1/30/09 -
Post by: Artcolley on January 31, 2009, 08:14:02 PM
These are the perpetrators in this case:

(http://i272.photobucket.com/albums/jj176/bastibro/Kalpoe/FFFFFFFFFFFF.jpg)

Caps, OE and even Kermit were/are just trying to get to the truth.
The problem is that some people having difficulties to stay humble and that they enjoy the fact that some people make them to important, unfortunately(and i exclude Kyle here) ::MonkeyWink::



1.Kermit-posted nothing but the truth backed up by the Freebirds,as well as Kyle!
2.Kyle-Potentially an accessory to obstruction of justice.Backed up by his own words,as well as actions.
3.CapsLockWizard-Has posted many false statements regarding this case!

And you call Kermit the fraud! ::MonkeyLaugh::

Kyle`s own words were ripped off their context by her. That`s my answer to you and to Janet.

sincerely, Bastian.

(http://i272.photobucket.com/albums/jj176/bastibro/Natalee/2fp29beth2.jpg)

Oh, Bastibro, you are so lying your little head off.
I have seen you posting at BNH.
I registered there but they kicked me off because I never posted.
They would have kicked you to the curb too, if you had never posted.
All of the Freebirds have come here and stated that Kyle's post
were never taken out of context and were exactly as posted.


An outright LIE, that gives me the right to call you a LIAR Magnolia.

Put a goat wool sock in it Bastibro.
 Klaas and Blonde have seen you post there too.


 ::cartwheel:: ::cartwheel:: ::cartwheel::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #797 1/30/09 -
Post by: texasmom on January 31, 2009, 08:14:45 PM
These are the perpetrators in this case:

(http://i272.photobucket.com/albums/jj176/bastibro/Kalpoe/FFFFFFFFFFFF.jpg)

Caps, OE and even Kermit were/are just trying to get to the truth.
The problem is that some people having difficulties to stay humble and that they enjoy the fact that some people make them to important, unfortunately(and i exclude Kyle here) ::MonkeyWink::



1.Kermit-posted nothing but the truth backed up by the Freebirds,as well as Kyle!
2.Kyle-Potentially an accessory to obstruction of justice.Backed up by his own words,as well as actions.
3.CapsLockWizard-Has posted many false statements regarding this case!

And you call Kermit the fraud! ::MonkeyLaugh::

Kyle`s own words were ripped off their context by her. That`s my answer to you and to Janet.

sincerely, Bastian.

(http://i272.photobucket.com/albums/jj176/bastibro/Natalee/2fp29beth2.jpg)

Oh, Bastibro, you are so lying your little head off.
I have seen you posting at BNH.
I registered there but they kicked me off because I never posted.
They would have kicked you to the curb too, if you had never posted.
All of the Freebirds have come here and stated that Kyle's post
were never taken out of context and were exactly as posted.


An outright LIE, that gives me the right to call you a LIAR Magnolia.

Put a goat wool sock in it Bastibro.
 Klaas and Blonde have seen you post there too.

And I truly hope he's allergic to wool.   ::MonkeyNoNo::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #797 1/30/09 -
Post by: Blue Moon on January 31, 2009, 08:15:53 PM
With my own eyes I have seen Bastibro's posts at BNH and CnG. 

Did you Klaas? Well, show me one post from me at BNH and show everyone that i`m a liar!!!
I`m sure you can`t. I also didn`t aspect this from you ::MonkeyNoNo::
But hey, that`s how we get to know eachother, i guess . .

And Magnolia, maybe you should get back to knit some goat-wool socks, that`s what you`re real good at ::MonkeyHaHa::

Maybe you need to go hang out with your loser friend ******* a little more.



OMG San.  You are the best. Why mince words?


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #797 1/30/09 -
Post by: klaasend on January 31, 2009, 08:17:16 PM
Bastibro- since I can't put my hands on proof at this moment that I've seen posts of yours at BNH I will apologize if you claim it's not true.  Doesn't really matter one way or the other anyway.  People post all over the place.  It's  more in WHAT is posted than WHERE it's posted.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #797 1/30/09 -
Post by: always 1 on January 31, 2009, 08:21:50 PM
And Tribro, I am sorry you took my post that way, and yes Im sorry I posted over there too.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #797 1/30/09 -
Post by: San on January 31, 2009, 08:22:34 PM
San - LOL

It doesn't matter if a monkey is boy or girl, just as long as they are in it for the GIRL (Natalee).

From day one I have always been in it for the girl.



Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #797 1/30/09 -
Post by: Blue Moon on January 31, 2009, 08:23:03 PM
SO, hows Brinkmans investigation going?  Or was that just a bunch of hot air?

Appears to have been hot air or stopped in it's tracks.  ::MonkeyRoll::



Stopped in it's track!!

You are really feared/respected Klaas.  Hey ... Tamikosmom has nightmares regarding the "red botton".

  ::MonkeyShocked::

Janet


What's a red botton????

A red botton is what is awarded to the monkey with the highest number of inane posts at the end of each year.
Hmmm, I dont know you very well, when I see your avi, I think of the beautiful post you made to Peaches when she left our world.


We all have many facets to our personality. Peaches was wonderful human being and I admired her for her honesty, her humour, her commitment and her courage.

I can readily feel empathy and compassion for others and their situations, but I have great difficulty accepting that those who appear supportive of this forum and it’s leaders, can at the same time be posting 220+ posts at the forum set up to undermine and defame this forum, with a big percentage of these posts being copies of posts made here and pasted in the “Look what was just posted at SM” thread to be ridiculed, along with unkind posts about one of the mods here.

I endeavour to always be up front and truthful in my posts and I do tend to say things as I see them, but equating my comments here with what I felt at the loss of a dear Monkey friend and my personal beliefs is totally uncalled for in this thread.


Thanks Tibro, honestly is appreciated. 


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #797 1/30/09 -
Post by: Blue Moon on January 31, 2009, 08:26:09 PM
Blue Moom - will you share some of that popcorn...

Sure will.  Like my monkey goddess.  I stole this from Klaas and CBB was kind enough to put it in my moon for me.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #797 1/30/09 -
Post by: Blue Moon on January 31, 2009, 08:29:00 PM
O.K. I am caught up.  Going to set back now and eat my popcorn.

 ::MonkeyLaugh:: ::MonkeyTongue::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #797 1/30/09 -
Post by: Tamikosmom on January 31, 2009, 08:29:37 PM

Hmmm, I dont know you very well, when I see your avi, I think of the beautiful post you made to Peaches when she left our world.



We all have many facets to our personality. Peaches was wonderful human being and I admired her for her honesty, her humour, her commitment and her courage.

I can readily feel empathy and compassion for others and their situations, but I have great difficulty accepting that those who appear supportive of this forum and it’s leaders, can at the same time be posting 220+ posts at the forum set up to undermine and defame this forum, with a big percentage of these posts being copies of posts made here and pasted in the “Look what was just posted at SM” thread to be ridiculed, along with unkind posts about one of the mods here.

I endeavour to always be up front and truthful in my posts and I do tend to say things as I see them, but equating my comments here with what I felt at the loss of a dear Monkey friend and my personal beliefs is totally uncalled for in this thread.


Tibo ... I do not believe that A1 meant to offend.  I believe she was attempting to be kind.

Sincerely, Janet


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #797 1/30/09 -
Post by: Tamikosmom on January 31, 2009, 08:31:14 PM
San - LOL

It doesn't matter if a monkey is boy or girl, just as long as they are in it for the GIRL (Natalee).

From day one I have always been in it for the girl.



Just tell me that you are a girl Monkey.

 ::MonkeyWaa::

Janet


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #797 1/30/09 -
Post by: always 1 on January 31, 2009, 08:32:06 PM

Hmmm, I dont know you very well, when I see your avi, I think of the beautiful post you made to Peaches when she left our world.



We all have many facets to our personality. Peaches was wonderful human being and I admired her for her honesty, her humour, her commitment and her courage.

I can readily feel empathy and compassion for others and their situations, but I have great difficulty accepting that those who appear supportive of this forum and it’s leaders, can at the same time be posting 220+ posts at the forum set up to undermine and defame this forum, with a big percentage of these posts being copies of posts made here and pasted in the “Look what was just posted at SM” thread to be ridiculed, along with unkind posts about one of the mods here.

I endeavour to always be up front and truthful in my posts and I do tend to say things as I see them, but equating my comments here with what I felt at the loss of a dear Monkey friend and my personal beliefs is totally uncalled for in this thread.


Tibo ... I do not believe that A1 meant to offend.  I believe she was attempting to be kind.

Sincerely, Janet
Thank you Janet, I was.  To clear the air, I apologize to all of you, I made a mistake.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #797 1/30/09 -
Post by: BUCKSHOT on January 31, 2009, 08:34:47 PM
The frog has answered all questions aimed at it, and backed them up with fact...Others (OE, Caps, Lalas) have been extended the same offer to redeem/clarify/answer/rebutt and have not done so.  Is this because they can’t factually validate their posts? Or does the cat seem to have their tongue? Just wondering…


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #797 1/30/09 -
Post by: Ree on January 31, 2009, 08:36:34 PM
With my own eyes I have seen Bastibro's posts at BNH and CnG. 

Did you Klaas? Well, show me one post from me at BNH and show everyone that i`m a liar!!!
I`m sure you can`t. I also didn`t aspect this from you ::MonkeyNoNo::
But hey, that`s how we get to know eachother, i guess . .

And Magnolia, maybe you should get back to knit some goat-wool socks, that`s what you`re real good at ::MonkeyHaHa::

Maybe you need to go hang out with your loser friend ******* a little more.

????????? ::MonkeyShocked::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #797 1/30/09 -
Post by: bastibro on January 31, 2009, 08:37:18 PM
Bastibro- since I can't put my hands on proof at this moment that I've seen posts of yours at BNH I will apologize if you claim it's not true.  Doesn't really matter one way or the other anyway.  People post all over the place.  It's  more in WHAT is posted than WHERE it's posted.

Thanks Klaas, i`ve never had a doubt of your integrity until an hour ago but that`s all erased now ::MonkeyWink::
What i post really is my opinion ::MonkeyEek::
People(real friends, family) have always told me i have a huge sense of justice so i do trust myself on that(in large humility to God).
Thank you ::MonkeyWink::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #797 1/30/09 -
Post by: BUCKSHOT on January 31, 2009, 08:41:57 PM
Non-Believers (of the frog) :

What is your explanation  for items located in a crab trap (congruent with the infamous ocean disposal theory) that were inadvertently filmed by the ROV? Why would Aruba seem so quick to want to control its contents...diving from a "police" type boat, retrieving contents, then returning back to the "police" type boat? Then never discussing with others their findings? After all, one of the purposes of the dive was to locate a missing trap on the ocean floor, which possibly could contain evidence of a crime against NH? Furthermore, no one has heard the ALE, nor Mos talk about it, either. Seemed like a significant find...Did the suspicious divers have zip-lock baggies in their pockets? The pictures of the cage definitely contained more than just a little piece of fabric...What happened to the other unexplained object(s)? Things that make ya go HMMMMMMMMMMMM...

Any facts (not theory, speculation, or rumor) to discredit the frog?


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #797 1/30/09 -
Post by: klaasend on January 31, 2009, 08:42:10 PM
I'm never affraid to admit when I'm wrong.  I have been wrong about alot of people over the last 4 years.  I was wrong about Bondia/Renfro when she was posting at SM.  I was wrong in the first week of this case giving ALE the benefit of the doubt. 


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #797 1/30/09 -
Post by: snoopy on January 31, 2009, 08:56:01 PM
With my own eyes I have seen Bastibro's posts at BNH and CnG. 

Did you Klaas? Well, show me one post from me at BNH and show everyone that i`m a liar!!!
I`m sure you can`t. I also didn`t aspect this from you ::MonkeyNoNo::
But hey, that`s how we get to know eachother, i guess . .

And Magnolia, maybe you should get back to knit some goat-wool socks, that`s what you`re real good at ::MonkeyHaHa::

Watch out big guy.  Klaas and Magnolia are two of the most respected people here. 

I've just about had enough of the bull-shit.  If it continues I'm gonna start talkin.  Some of ya'll don't want me to do that.  You know it's always the quiet ones you have to watch out for.


 ::MonkeyNoNo:: ::MonkeyNoNo:: ::MonkeyNoNo::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #797 1/30/09 -
Post by: BUCKSHOT on January 31, 2009, 08:56:41 PM
Since Klaasend set the record straight about Lalas not being banned...
Has Lalas gotten her computer glitch taken care of for the purpose of responding?
And since some claim to know and communicate to Caps and OE...
Why have they not bothered to clear the air, if false information was reported?

 ::MonkeyEek:: ::MonkeyRoll:: ::MonkeyConfused::

Very telling for me...

 ::MonkeyShocked:: ::MonkeyShocked:: ::MonkeyShocked::





Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #797 1/30/09 -
Post by: Magnolia on January 31, 2009, 08:57:36 PM
I'm never affraid to admit when I'm wrong.  I have been wrong about alot of people over the last 4 years.  I was wrong about Bondia/Renfro when she was posting at SM.  I was wrong in the first week of this case giving ALE the benefit of the doubt. 

You aren't wrong about much, Klaas.
We have all been taken in a time or two.
I believed in the Persistence and I believed CapsLockWizzard for a while,
although Janet was never fooled.
It has been a complicated case with many twists and turns.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #797 1/30/09 -
Post by: snoopy on January 31, 2009, 08:57:49 PM

I think his shift for the disruptions was over anyway.

I don't think so.  It's still early grab your popcorn and a seat.

I 'll knit while I wait. ::MonkeyLaugh:: ::MonkeyLaugh:: ::MonkeyLaugh::

You go girl!!

I gotta can of Missouri whoop azz I'm just about ready to open up.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #797 1/30/09 -
Post by: Tamikosmom on January 31, 2009, 09:01:34 PM
With my own eyes I have seen Bastibro's posts at BNH and CnG. 

Did you Klaas? Well, show me one post from me at BNH and show everyone that i`m a liar!!!
I`m sure you can`t. I also didn`t aspect this from you ::MonkeyNoNo::
But hey, that`s how we get to know eachother, i guess . .

And Magnolia, maybe you should get back to knit some goat-wool socks, that`s what you`re real good at ::MonkeyHaHa::

Watch out big guy.  Klaas and Magnolia are two of the most respected people here. 

I've just about had enough of the bull-shit.  If it continues I'm gonna start talkin.  Some of ya'll don't want me to do that.  You know it's always the quiet ones you have to watch out for.


 ::MonkeyNoNo:: ::MonkeyNoNo:: ::MonkeyNoNo::


Tread softly Snoopy.  Remember the star gazing incident when hubby was contemplating calling a meeting with the grown kids ... a meeting that would have had you going to a "rest" home ...

 ::MonkeyNoNo::

Janet


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #797 1/30/09 -
Post by: San on January 31, 2009, 09:03:03 PM
With my own eyes I have seen Bastibro's posts at BNH and CnG. 

Did you Klaas? Well, show me one post from me at BNH and show everyone that i`m a liar!!!
I`m sure you can`t. I also didn`t aspect this from you ::MonkeyNoNo::
But hey, that`s how we get to know eachother, i guess . .

And Magnolia, maybe you should get back to knit some goat-wool socks, that`s what you`re real good at ::MonkeyHaHa::

Watch out big guy.  Klaas and Magnolia are two of the most respected people here. 

I've just about had enough of the bull-shit.  If it continues I'm gonna start talkin.  Some of ya'll don't want me to do that.  You know it's always the quiet ones you have to watch out for.


 ::MonkeyNoNo:: ::MonkeyNoNo:: ::MonkeyNoNo::


So true Snoopy.  ::MonkeyWink::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #797 1/30/09 -
Post by: texasmom on January 31, 2009, 09:03:58 PM
With my own eyes I have seen Bastibro's posts at BNH and CnG. 

Did you Klaas? Well, show me one post from me at BNH and show everyone that i`m a liar!!!
I`m sure you can`t. I also didn`t aspect this from you ::MonkeyNoNo::
But hey, that`s how we get to know eachother, i guess . .

And Magnolia, maybe you should get back to knit some goat-wool socks, that`s what you`re real good at ::MonkeyHaHa::

Watch out big guy.  Klaas and Magnolia are two of the most respected people here. 

I've just about had enough of the bull-shit.  If it continues I'm gonna start talkin.  Some of ya'll don't want me to do that.  You know it's always the quiet ones you have to watch out for.


 ::MonkeyNoNo:: ::MonkeyNoNo:: ::MonkeyNoNo::


Tread softly Snoopy.  Remember the star gazing incident when hubby was contemplating calling a meeting with the grown kids ... a meeting that would have had you going to a "rest" home ...

 ::MonkeyNoNo::

Janet

 ::MonkeyHaHa::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #797 1/30/09 -
Post by: klaasend on January 31, 2009, 09:05:11 PM
Since Klaasend set the record straight about Lalas not being banned...
Has Lalas gotten her computer glitch taken care of for the purpose of responding?
And since some claim to know and communicate to Caps and OE...
Why have they not bothered to clear the air, if false information was reported?

 ::MonkeyEek:: ::MonkeyRoll:: ::MonkeyConfused::

Very telling for me...

 ::MonkeyShocked:: ::MonkeyShocked:: ::MonkeyShocked::





Evidentally she has chosen not to post here


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #797 1/30/09 -
Post by: snoopy on January 31, 2009, 09:08:35 PM
With my own eyes I have seen Bastibro's posts at BNH and CnG. 

Did you Klaas? Well, show me one post from me at BNH and show everyone that i`m a liar!!!
I`m sure you can`t. I also didn`t aspect this from you ::MonkeyNoNo::
But hey, that`s how we get to know eachother, i guess . .

And Magnolia, maybe you should get back to knit some goat-wool socks, that`s what you`re real good at ::MonkeyHaHa::

Watch out big guy.  Klaas and Magnolia are two of the most respected people here. 

I've just about had enough of the bull-shit.  If it continues I'm gonna start talkin.  Some of ya'll don't want me to do that.  You know it's always the quiet ones you have to watch out for.


 ::MonkeyNoNo:: ::MonkeyNoNo:: ::MonkeyNoNo::


Tread softly Snoopy.  Remember the star gazing incident when hubby was contemplating calling a meeting with the grown kids ... a meeting that would have had you going to a "rest" home ...

 ::MonkeyNoNo::

Janet


 ::MonkeyHaHa:: ::MonkeyHaHa::

Sorry I cussed.  This is just so rediculous.  Natalee deserves justice.  It's about her and not a few peoples self serving interest.  For gosh sakes it's a freakin internet forum.  Get a gosh darn life some of ya'll.  You know who I mean to.

Isn't it amazing how peoples true colors eventually come out.  They just can't behave for very long.  Pathetic.

I stand with the girl

I stand with the monkeys

I stand with the family

I stand with Kermit

I stand with the Freebirds


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #797 1/30/09 -
Post by: texasmom on January 31, 2009, 09:12:06 PM
With my own eyes I have seen Bastibro's posts at BNH and CnG. 

Did you Klaas? Well, show me one post from me at BNH and show everyone that i`m a liar!!!
I`m sure you can`t. I also didn`t aspect this from you ::MonkeyNoNo::
But hey, that`s how we get to know eachother, i guess . .

And Magnolia, maybe you should get back to knit some goat-wool socks, that`s what you`re real good at ::MonkeyHaHa::

Watch out big guy.  Klaas and Magnolia are two of the most respected people here. 

I've just about had enough of the bull-shit.  If it continues I'm gonna start talkin.  Some of ya'll don't want me to do that.  You know it's always the quiet ones you have to watch out for.


 ::MonkeyNoNo:: ::MonkeyNoNo:: ::MonkeyNoNo::


Tread softly Snoopy.  Remember the star gazing incident when hubby was contemplating calling a meeting with the grown kids ... a meeting that would have had you going to a "rest" home ...

 ::MonkeyNoNo::

Janet


 ::MonkeyHaHa:: ::MonkeyHaHa::

Sorry I cussed.  This is just so rediculous.  Natalee deserves justice.  It's about her and not a few peoples self serving interest.  For gosh sakes it's a freakin internet forum.  Get a gosh darn life some of ya'll.  You know who I mean to.

Isn't it amazing how peoples true colors eventually come out.  They just can't behave for very long.  Pathetic.

I stand with the girl

I stand with the monkeys

I stand with the family

I stand with Kermit

I stand with the Freebirds


It's o.k. snoopy, I cussed too; just didn't post it.  I've done a lot of backspacing tonight.   ::MonkeyHaHa::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #797 1/30/09 -
Post by: Tamikosmom on January 31, 2009, 09:13:07 PM
I'm never affraid to admit when I'm wrong.  I have been wrong about alot of people over the last 4 years.  I was wrong about Bondia/Renfro when she was posting at SM.  I was wrong in the first week of this case giving ALE the benefit of the doubt. 

Me neither.  If I am ever wrong ... I will be be first to admit it.

 ::MonkeyHaHa::

My quiet hubby thinks I am perfect.  When "we" have a dispute ... it is always one sided.  I say what is on my mind.  Hubby then looks up from watching the TV ... looks me in the eye and responds ...  "ya ya, and you are just perfect".

What else can I say.

 ::cartwheel::

Janet


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #797 1/30/09 -
Post by: Nut44x4 on January 31, 2009, 09:14:47 PM
O/T coming up
Join John Walsh on the search for Kyle Fleischmann.

Saturday on FOX, 9 p.m. ET/PT, 8 p.m. CT.

The disappearance of an Elon University graduate will be featured on the TV show "America's Most Wanted" on Saturday.
Kyle Fleischmann, 25, has been missing since November 2007. He was last seen at Buckhead Saloon in Charlotte, where he lived. Fleischmann is a 2006 graduate of Elon.
The case was featured on "America's Most Wanted" in December 2007 and will be shown again Saturday, according to the show's Web site. The show begins at 9 p.m. on Fox.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #797 1/30/09 -
Post by: snoopy on January 31, 2009, 09:15:44 PM
Thank you Nut44x4


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #797 1/30/09 -
Post by: Tamikosmom on January 31, 2009, 09:16:47 PM
O/T coming up
Join John Walsh on the search for Kyle Fleischmann.

Saturday on FOX, 9 p.m. ET/PT, 8 p.m. CT.

The disappearance of an Elon University graduate will be featured on the TV show "America's Most Wanted" on Saturday.
Kyle Fleischmann, 25, has been missing since November 2007. He was last seen at Buckhead Saloon in Charlotte, where he lived. Fleischmann is a 2006 graduate of Elon.
The case was featured on "America's Most Wanted" in December 2007 and will be shown again Saturday, according to the show's Web site. The show begins at 9 p.m. on Fox.


Thank Nut.

Janet


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #797 1/30/09 -
Post by: crazybabyborg on January 31, 2009, 09:34:12 PM
I'm never affraid to admit when I'm wrong.  I have been wrong about alot of people over the last 4 years.  I was wrong about Bondia/Renfro when she was posting at SM.  I was wrong in the first week of this case giving ALE the benefit of the doubt. 

Me neither.  If I am ever wrong ... I will be be first to admit it.

 ::MonkeyHaHa::

My quiet hubby thinks I am perfect.  When "we" have a dispute ... it is always one sided.  I say what is on my mind.  Hubby then looks up from watching the TV ... looks me in the eye and responds ...  "ya ya, and you are just perfect".

What else can I say.

 ::cartwheel::

Janet

Oh no! Please let's don't start posting all of our wrongs! My list would be so much longer than anyone else's! The only longer one would be where I acknowledge that I was wrong!!  ::MonkeyShocked::

BTW/OT  I just posted the answers to the first SM trivia quiz in Musings. You guys should have had them all hands down. There's still one unanswered. If you get a chance, go take a look and post your own!   ::MonkeyWink::
STUMP THE MONKEYS!!!   ::MonkeyHaHa::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #797 1/30/09 -
Post by: Anna on January 31, 2009, 09:35:28 PM
Since Klaasend set the record straight about Lalas not being banned...
Has Lalas gotten her computer glitch taken care of for the purpose of responding?
And since some claim to know and communicate to Caps and OE...
Why have they not bothered to clear the air, if false information was reported?

 ::MonkeyEek:: ::MonkeyRoll:: ::MonkeyConfused::

Very telling for me...

 ::MonkeyShocked:: ::MonkeyShocked:: ::MonkeyShocked::





Evidentally she has chosen not to post here


I wish she would.  I would like to ask her if she is the one who started the lie that I reported her to the FBI for posting about Lorenzo van Rijn as I would truly like to know who would fabricate such a whopping lie.  I would never have thought Lala's would do such a thing but can think of some people who probably would.  But without Lala's backing that up, wouldn't make any sense.  Doesn't anyway.  I am not so stupid I would think they would care.  It's just yet another nasty thing done in hidey holes.



Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #797 1/30/09 -
Post by: Nut44x4 on January 31, 2009, 09:44:01 PM
Goodnight (http://bestsmileys.com/peace/1.gif)


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #797 1/30/09 -
Post by: Hotshot on January 31, 2009, 09:45:33 PM
Do you all remember when SM came to life?  We were all nice, everyone had their own ideas, and shared.  It was OK back then.  Now look below as to some of the nasty things people have to say HERE years later.  My answers in purple.

blue moon   Brinkman probably at this moment belongs the the CnG site. Appears everyone does, why not him?......Why are you so jealous?  Because they didn't ask you to join?   
Lady Devon   Since I seldom post and won't suffer if I am banned or reprimanded , I will say to Idstlou, "Enough!" Be silent long enough to read what others have shared with you, take the time to READ EVERY WORD......We have read every word a million times plus with the way some repeatedly post here.  It's not going to change a thing.   I have said many times "not that it means a thing"  Kyle was not in charge of the boat.  Nothing was his call, at all.  Just reading the screen.  CAPS is alot of what you'll all never see, because you chose to put his life at risk, by posting everything here on him.  
San   Maybe you need to go hang out with your loser friend ******* a little more............Wow, thats some harsh words there.  Can you prove this, is there a link?And they made you a mod?  Ooops, hurry and erase that!

Texasmom   And I truly hope he's allergic to wool. ........Thats horrible, what a Christian you are.

Always   And Tribro, I am sorry you took my post that way, and yes I'm sorry I posted over there too.......You are sorry?  Why?  
Buckshot   What is your explanation for items located in a crab trap (congruent with the infamous ocean disposal theory) that were inadvertently filmed by the ROV? Why would Aruba seem so quick to want to control its contents...diving from a "police" type boat, retrieving contents, then returning back to the "police" type boat? Then never discussing with others their findings? After all, one of the purposes of the dive was to locate a missing trap on the ocean floor, which possibly could contain evidence of a crime against NH? Furthermore, no one has heard the ALE, nor Mos talk about it, either. Seemed like a significant find...Did the suspicious divers have zip-lock baggies in their pockets? The pictures of the cage definitely contained more than just a little piece of fabric...What happened to the other unexplained object(s)? Things that make ya go HMMMMMMMMMMMM...And since some claim to know and communicate to Caps and OE........Things in the trap are things we will never know because of ALE, or maybe we will know because of the FBI crack pot that was on the boat.  But probably not because he was taken off the case, he was a bad seed.  He has been from the beginning.  Who evers call it was to let the ALE take this over made a VERY BAD decision, for sure.  But that wasn't Kyles call.  We don't claim to know these people, WE DO know and talk with these people.  SM people ran them off, and they choose not to come back here.  I can't blame them.  You want them to come back and speak after all you have done to them?  Would you come back if that was done to you after all your hard work?  Hey, I too know how they feel.  You do the same to me, but I am still here defending.  .............
Why have they not bothered to clear the air, if false information was reported?

Any facts (not theory, speculation, or rumor) to discredit the frog?   Oh there is alot of things to discredit someone who called themselves something they are not.
Snoopy   I've just about had enough of the bull-shit. If it continues I'm gonna start talkin.................talk, not too much that hasn't been said already.
Klaas   Evidentally she has chosen not to post here.......... ?

You know, whats on the internet is for public use, we have all said that many times.  So, why is it a big deal that things are taken over to other places?   We are all doing the same thing, and that is investigating the disappearance of Natalee Holloway.  It's just that this group likes who they share with, and that group likes who they share with.  It seems to keep the bickering out of all of it, and thats how it should be.  I don't see you picking on the Goldmonkeys, or BFN, or any of the others out there.  Freebirds are here now, because there is no where else to go.  Either they were kicked outta the Freebirds, OR they have given up and want to take some glory.  Fine, they were good people till all of this.  Lots of respect has been lost due to all that has been said here.   


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #797 1/30/09 -
Post by: BUCKSHOT on January 31, 2009, 09:49:52 PM
Non-Believers (of the frog) :

What is your explanation  for items located in a crab trap (congruent with the infamous ocean disposal theory) that were inadvertently filmed by the ROV? Why would Aruba seem so quick to want to control its contents...diving from a "police" type boat, retrieving contents, then returning back to the "police" type boat? Then never discussing with others their findings? After all, one of the purposes of the dive was to locate a missing trap on the ocean floor, which possibly could contain evidence of a crime against NH? Furthermore, no one has heard the ALE, nor Mos talk about it, either. Seemed like a significant find...Did the suspicious divers have zip-lock baggies in their pockets? The pictures of the cage definitely contained more than just a little piece of fabric...What happened to the other unexplained object(s)? Things that make ya go HMMMMMMMMMMMM...

Any facts (not theory, speculation, or rumor) to discredit the frog?

Wish Janet would post this over and over, as it would be a great place to start...

 :smt014


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #797 1/30/09 -
Post by: wreck on January 31, 2009, 09:56:18 PM
Hotshot, every single one of you have been offered the forum to tell YOUR side.  Still waiting for just ONE answer or rebuttle. Were not the ones coming here and calling out posters and casting aspersions. If you don't like it here -take a hike and take your friends with you. You alll are very tiresome.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #797 1/30/09 -
Post by: Blue Moon on January 31, 2009, 09:56:38 PM
Do you all remember when SM came to life?  We were all nice, everyone had their own ideas, and shared.  It was OK back then.  Now look below as to some of the nasty things people have to say HERE years later.  My answers in purple.

blue moon   Brinkman probably at this moment belongs the the CnG site. Appears everyone does, why not him?......Why are you so jealous?  Because they didn't ask you to join?   
Lady Devon   Since I seldom post and won't suffer if I am banned or reprimanded , I will say to Idstlou, "Enough!" Be silent long enough to read what others have shared with you, take the time to READ EVERY WORD......We have read every word a million times plus with the way some repeatedly post here.  It's not going to change a thing.   I have said many times "not that it means a thing"  Kyle was not in charge of the boat.  Nothing was his call, at all.  Just reading the screen.  CAPS is alot of what you'll all never see, because you chose to put his life at risk, by posting everything here on him.  
San   Maybe you need to go hang out with your loser friend ******* a little more............Wow, thats some harsh words there.  Can you prove this, is there a link?And they made you a mod?  Ooops, hurry and erase that!

Texasmom   And I truly hope he's allergic to wool. ........Thats horrible, what a Christian you are.

Always   And Tribro, I am sorry you took my post that way, and yes I'm sorry I posted over there too.......You are sorry?  Why?  
Buckshot   What is your explanation for items located in a crab trap (congruent with the infamous ocean disposal theory) that were inadvertently filmed by the ROV? Why would Aruba seem so quick to want to control its contents...diving from a "police" type boat, retrieving contents, then returning back to the "police" type boat? Then never discussing with others their findings? After all, one of the purposes of the dive was to locate a missing trap on the ocean floor, which possibly could contain evidence of a crime against NH? Furthermore, no one has heard the ALE, nor Mos talk about it, either. Seemed like a significant find...Did the suspicious divers have zip-lock baggies in their pockets? The pictures of the cage definitely contained more than just a little piece of fabric...What happened to the other unexplained object(s)? Things that make ya go HMMMMMMMMMMMM...And since some claim to know and communicate to Caps and OE........Things in the trap are things we will never know because of ALE, or maybe we will know because of the FBI crack pot that was on the boat.  But probably not because he was taken off the case, he was a bad seed.  He has been from the beginning.  Who evers call it was to let the ALE take this over made a VERY BAD decision, for sure.  But that wasn't Kyles call.  We don't claim to know these people, WE DO know and talk with these people.  SM people ran them off, and they choose not to come back here.  I can't blame them.  You want them to come back and speak after all you have done to them?  Would you come back if that was done to you after all your hard work?  Hey, I too know how they feel.  You do the same to me, but I am still here defending.  .............
Why have they not bothered to clear the air, if false information was reported?

Any facts (not theory, speculation, or rumor) to discredit the frog?   Oh there is alot of things to discredit someone who called themselves something they are not.
Snoopy   I've just about had enough of the bull-shit. If it continues I'm gonna start talkin.................talk, not too much that hasn't been said already.
Klaas   Evidentally she has chosen not to post here.......... ?

You know, whats on the internet is for public use, we have all said that many times.  So, why is it a big deal that things are taken over to other places?   We are all doing the same thing, and that is investigating the disappearance of Natalee Holloway.  It's just that this group likes who they share with, and that group likes who they share with.  It seems to keep the bickering out of all of it, and thats how it should be.  I don't see you picking on the Goldmonkeys, or BFN, or any of the others out there.  Freebirds are here now, because there is no where else to go.  Either they were kicked outta the Freebirds, OR they have given up and want to take some glory.  Fine, they were good people till all of this.  Lots of respect has been lost due to all that has been said here.   


Jealous, you have got to be kidding.  You all are the most childish people I have even met in my life.  Don't flatter yourself.  Guess I am special though cause you noticed my post.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #797 1/30/09 -
Post by: texasmom on January 31, 2009, 09:57:41 PM
Do you all remember when SM came to life?  We were all nice, everyone had their own ideas, and shared.  It was OK back then.  Now look below as to some of the nasty things people have to say HERE years later.  My answers in purple.

blue moon   Brinkman probably at this moment belongs the the CnG site. Appears everyone does, why not him?......Why are you so jealous?  Because they didn't ask you to join?   
Lady Devon   Since I seldom post and won't suffer if I am banned or reprimanded , I will say to Idstlou, "Enough!" Be silent long enough to read what others have shared with you, take the time to READ EVERY WORD......We have read every word a million times plus with the way some repeatedly post here.  It's not going to change a thing.   I have said many times "not that it means a thing"  Kyle was not in charge of the boat.  Nothing was his call, at all.  Just reading the screen.  CAPS is alot of what you'll all never see, because you chose to put his life at risk, by posting everything here on him.  
San   Maybe you need to go hang out with your loser friend ******* a little more............Wow, thats some harsh words there.  Can you prove this, is there a link?And they made you a mod?  Ooops, hurry and erase that!

Texasmom   And I truly hope he's allergic to wool. ........Thats horrible, what a Christian you are.

Always   And Tribro, I am sorry you took my post that way, and yes I'm sorry I posted over there too.......You are sorry?  Why?  
Buckshot   What is your explanation for items located in a crab trap (congruent with the infamous ocean disposal theory) that were inadvertently filmed by the ROV? Why would Aruba seem so quick to want to control its contents...diving from a "police" type boat, retrieving contents, then returning back to the "police" type boat? Then never discussing with others their findings? After all, one of the purposes of the dive was to locate a missing trap on the ocean floor, which possibly could contain evidence of a crime against NH? Furthermore, no one has heard the ALE, nor Mos talk about it, either. Seemed like a significant find...Did the suspicious divers have zip-lock baggies in their pockets? The pictures of the cage definitely contained more than just a little piece of fabric...What happened to the other unexplained object(s)? Things that make ya go HMMMMMMMMMMMM...And since some claim to know and communicate to Caps and OE........Things in the trap are things we will never know because of ALE, or maybe we will know because of the FBI crack pot that was on the boat.  But probably not because he was taken off the case, he was a bad seed.  He has been from the beginning.  Who evers call it was to let the ALE take this over made a VERY BAD decision, for sure.  But that wasn't Kyles call.  We don't claim to know these people, WE DO know and talk with these people.  SM people ran them off, and they choose not to come back here.  I can't blame them.  You want them to come back and speak after all you have done to them?  Would you come back if that was done to you after all your hard work?  Hey, I too know how they feel.  You do the same to me, but I am still here defending.  .............
Why have they not bothered to clear the air, if false information was reported?

Any facts (not theory, speculation, or rumor) to discredit the frog?   Oh there is alot of things to discredit someone who called themselves something they are not.
Snoopy   I've just about had enough of the bull-shit. If it continues I'm gonna start talkin.................talk, not too much that hasn't been said already.
Klaas   Evidentally she has chosen not to post here.......... ?

You know, whats on the internet is for public use, we have all said that many times.  So, why is it a big deal that things are taken over to other places?   We are all doing the same thing, and that is investigating the disappearance of Natalee Holloway.  It's just that this group likes who they share with, and that group likes who they share with.  It seems to keep the bickering out of all of it, and thats how it should be.  I don't see you picking on the Goldmonkeys, or BFN, or any of the others out there.  Freebirds are here now, because there is no where else to go.  Either they were kicked outta the Freebirds, OR they have given up and want to take some glory.  Fine, they were good people till all of this.  Lots of respect has been lost due to all that has been said here.   


A picture's worth a thousand words.

(http://photos1.blogger.com/blogger/7977/1351/400/Kathy%20and%20Steve.0.jpg)


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #797 1/30/09 -
Post by: Anna on January 31, 2009, 09:58:56 PM
Hotshot,
Did Lala's tell you I reported her to the FBI or did you make that up all on your own?

It's a lie and you very likely know that.  The FBI is not interested in Internet forums.  They are in other things though.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #797 1/30/09 -
Post by: Anna on January 31, 2009, 10:02:24 PM
Non-Believers (of the frog) :

What is your explanation  for items located in a crab trap (congruent with the infamous ocean disposal theory) that were inadvertently filmed by the ROV? Why would Aruba seem so quick to want to control its contents...diving from a "police" type boat, retrieving contents, then returning back to the "police" type boat? Then never discussing with others their findings? After all, one of the purposes of the dive was to locate a missing trap on the ocean floor, which possibly could contain evidence of a crime against NH? Furthermore, no one has heard the ALE, nor Mos talk about it, either. Seemed like a significant find...Did the suspicious divers have zip-lock baggies in their pockets? The pictures of the cage definitely contained more than just a little piece of fabric...What happened to the other unexplained object(s)? Things that make ya go HMMMMMMMMMMMM...

Any facts (not theory, speculation, or rumor) to discredit the frog?

Wish Janet would post this over and over, as it would be a great place to start...

 :smt014

It would be a good place to start.

Just refute the information provided by Kyle.

That is all we have asked.

And yet have been called names, insulted and lied about and more.  Just for asking for one shred of proof that what Kyle said was not true.  I wish to heaven it wasn't!  But yet all we get is name calling because we bother to read and take his posts seriously.

Strange how the rest of us can disagree and have different opinions but only some have to call names, call people crazy, liars, frauds, etc.

I guess that's the difference in character of people, however.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #797 1/30/09 -
Post by: Hotshot on January 31, 2009, 10:03:49 PM
 
Quote
author=texasmom link=topic=4460.msg654345#msg654345 date=1233457061]
Do you all remember when SM came to life?  We were all nice, everyone had their own ideas, and shared.  It was OK back then.  Now look below as to some of the nasty things people have to say HERE years later.  My answers in purple.

blue moon   Brinkman probably at this moment belongs the the CnG site. Appears everyone does, why not him?......Why are you so jealous?  Because they didn't ask you to join?   
Lady Devon   Since I seldom post and won't suffer if I am banned or reprimanded , I will say to Idstlou, "Enough!" Be silent long enough to read what others have shared with you, take the time to READ EVERY WORD......We have read every word a million times plus with the way some repeatedly post here.  It's not going to change a thing.   I have said many times "not that it means a thing"  Kyle was not in charge of the boat.  Nothing was his call, at all.  Just reading the screen.  CAPS is alot of what you'll all never see, because you chose to put his life at risk, by posting everything here on him.  
San   Maybe you need to go hang out with your loser friend ******* a little more............Wow, thats some harsh words there.  Can you prove this, is there a link?And they made you a mod?  Ooops, hurry and erase that!

Texasmom   And I truly hope he's allergic to wool. ........Thats horrible, what a Christian you are.

Always   And Tribro, I am sorry you took my post that way, and yes I'm sorry I posted over there too.......You are sorry?  Why?  
Buckshot   What is your explanation for items located in a crab trap (congruent with the infamous ocean disposal theory) that were inadvertently filmed by the ROV? Why would Aruba seem so quick to want to control its contents...diving from a "police" type boat, retrieving contents, then returning back to the "police" type boat? Then never discussing with others their findings? After all, one of the purposes of the dive was to locate a missing trap on the ocean floor, which possibly could contain evidence of a crime against NH? Furthermore, no one has heard the ALE, nor Mos talk about it, either. Seemed like a significant find...Did the suspicious divers have zip-lock baggies in their pockets? The pictures of the cage definitely contained more than just a little piece of fabric...What happened to the other unexplained object(s)? Things that make ya go HMMMMMMMMMMMM...And since some claim to know and communicate to Caps and OE........Things in the trap are things we will never know because of ALE, or maybe we will know because of the FBI crack pot that was on the boat.  But probably not because he was taken off the case, he was a bad seed.  He has been from the beginning.  Who evers call it was to let the ALE take this over made a VERY BAD decision, for sure.  But that wasn't Kyles call.  We don't claim to know these people, WE DO know and talk with these people.  SM people ran them off, and they choose not to come back here.  I can't blame them.  You want them to come back and speak after all you have done to them?  Would you come back if that was done to you after all your hard work?  Hey, I too know how they feel.  You do the same to me, but I am still here defending.  .............
Why have they not bothered to clear the air, if false information was reported?

Any facts (not theory, speculation, or rumor) to discredit the frog?   Oh there is alot of things to discredit someone who called themselves something they are not.
Snoopy   I've just about had enough of the bull-shit. If it continues I'm gonna start talkin.................talk, not too much that hasn't been said already.
Klaas   Evidentally she has chosen not to post here.......... ?

You know, whats on the internet is for public use, we have all said that many times.  So, why is it a big deal that things are taken over to other places?   We are all doing the same thing, and that is investigating the disappearance of Natalee Holloway.  It's just that this group likes who they share with, and that group likes who they share with.  It seems to keep the bickering out of all of it, and thats how it should be.  I don't see you picking on the Goldmonkeys, or BFN, or any of the others out there.  Freebirds are here now, because there is no where else to go.  Either they were kicked outta the Freebirds, OR they have given up and want to take some glory.  Fine, they were good people till all of this.  Lots of respect has been lost due to all that has been said here.   


Yup, you would be the one to post something like this.  Once again jealousy will get you nowhere fast.  At least you know I went to Aruba to get info.  Alot more then what you have done.  Ohhhhh Call out the frog...I smell her coming!  Or call out the newbie frog.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #797 1/30/09 -
Post by: Anna on January 31, 2009, 10:03:51 PM
Hotshot,
Did Lala's tell you I reported her to the FBI or did you make that up all on your own?

It's a lie and you very likely know that.  The FBI is not interested in Internet forums.  They are in other things though.


BUMP


.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #797 1/30/09 -
Post by: wreck on January 31, 2009, 10:04:26 PM
Quote
"A picture is worth a 1000 words"

 ::MonkeyEek::  ::MonkeyLaugh::  ::MonkeyEek::  ::MonkeyShocked::  ::cartwheel::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #797 1/30/09 -
Post by: Blue Moon on January 31, 2009, 10:04:49 PM
Hotshot, why not open up CnG just like SM so everyone can read and post there just like you and the rest of the crowd do here?  Then we can be the judge of what is being said there versus what is being said here.  Just a suggestion.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #797 1/30/09 -
Post by: hotping on January 31, 2009, 10:05:16 PM
Do you all remember when SM came to life?  We were all nice, everyone had their own ideas, and shared.  It was OK back then.  Now look below as to some of the nasty things people have to say HERE years later.  My answers in purple.

blue moon   Brinkman probably at this moment belongs the the CnG site. Appears everyone does, why not him?......Why are you so jealous?  Because they didn't ask you to join?   
Lady Devon   Since I seldom post and won't suffer if I am banned or reprimanded , I will say to Idstlou, "Enough!" Be silent long enough to read what others have shared with you, take the time to READ EVERY WORD......We have read every word a million times plus with the way some repeatedly post here.  It's not going to change a thing.   I have said many times "not that it means a thing"  Kyle was not in charge of the boat.  Nothing was his call, at all.  Just reading the screen.  CAPS is alot of what you'll all never see, because you chose to put his life at risk, by posting everything here on him.  
San   Maybe you need to go hang out with your loser friend ******* a little more............Wow, thats some harsh words there.  Can you prove this, is there a link?And they made you a mod?  Ooops, hurry and erase that!

Texasmom   And I truly hope he's allergic to wool. ........Thats horrible, what a Christian you are.

Always   And Tribro, I am sorry you took my post that way, and yes I'm sorry I posted over there too.......You are sorry?  Why?  
Buckshot   What is your explanation for items located in a crab trap (congruent with the infamous ocean disposal theory) that were inadvertently filmed by the ROV? Why would Aruba seem so quick to want to control its contents...diving from a "police" type boat, retrieving contents, then returning back to the "police" type boat? Then never discussing with others their findings? After all, one of the purposes of the dive was to locate a missing trap on the ocean floor, which possibly could contain evidence of a crime against NH? Furthermore, no one has heard the ALE, nor Mos talk about it, either. Seemed like a significant find...Did the suspicious divers have zip-lock baggies in their pockets? The pictures of the cage definitely contained more than just a little piece of fabric...What happened to the other unexplained object(s)? Things that make ya go HMMMMMMMMMMMM...And since some claim to know and communicate to Caps and OE........Things in the trap are things we will never know because of ALE, or maybe we will know because of the FBI crack pot that was on the boat.  But probably not because he was taken off the case, he was a bad seed.  He has been from the beginning.  Who evers call it was to let the ALE take this over made a VERY BAD decision, for sure.  But that wasn't Kyles call.  We don't claim to know these people, WE DO know and talk with these people.  SM people ran them off, and they choose not to come back here.  I can't blame them.  You want them to come back and speak after all you have done to them?  Would you come back if that was done to you after all your hard work?  Hey, I too know how they feel.  You do the same to me, but I am still here defending.  .............
Why have they not bothered to clear the air, if false information was reported?

Any facts (not theory, speculation, or rumor) to discredit the frog?   Oh there is alot of things to discredit someone who called themselves something they are not.
Snoopy   I've just about had enough of the bull-shit. If it continues I'm gonna start talkin.................talk, not too much that hasn't been said already.
Klaas   Evidentally she has chosen not to post here.......... ?

You know, whats on the internet is for public use, we have all said that many times.  So, why is it a big deal that things are taken over to other places?   We are all doing the same thing, and that is investigating the disappearance of Natalee Holloway.  It's just that this group likes who they share with, and that group likes who they share with.  It seems to keep the bickering out of all of it, and thats how it should be.  I don't see you picking on the Goldmonkeys, or BFN, or any of the others out there.  Freebirds are here now, because there is no where else to go.  Either they were kicked outta the Freebirds, OR they have given up and want to take some glory.  Fine, they were good people till all of this.  Lots of respect has been lost due to all that has been said here.   


A picture's worth a thousand words.

(http://photos1.blogger.com/blogger/7977/1351/400/Kathy%20and%20Steve.0.jpg)
Hotshot...I used to have respect for You but now all I have for You is revulsion...Who the hell do You think You are...Telling anyone to be ashamed of theirselves...Just look at Yourself in this picture...there is absolutely no excuse to be in an embrace with SC unless You will stoop to anything to get what You want...Disgusting absolutely disgusting... 


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #797 1/30/09 -
Post by: Anna on January 31, 2009, 10:07:34 PM
A picture's worth a thousand words.

(http://photos1.blogger.com/blogger/7977/1351/400/Kathy%20and%20Steve.0.jpg)

 
Yes, it is.  Just getting information, donchaknow.   ::MonkeyDance::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #797 1/30/09 -
Post by: San on January 31, 2009, 10:07:50 PM
Do you all remember when SM came to life?  We were all nice, everyone had their own ideas, and shared.  It was OK back then.  Now look below as to some of the nasty things people have to say HERE years later.  My answers in purple.

blue moon   Brinkman probably at this moment belongs the the CnG site. Appears everyone does, why not him?......Why are you so jealous?  Because they didn't ask you to join?   
Lady Devon   Since I seldom post and won't suffer if I am banned or reprimanded , I will say to Idstlou, "Enough!" Be silent long enough to read what others have shared with you, take the time to READ EVERY WORD......We have read every word a million times plus with the way some repeatedly post here.  It's not going to change a thing.   I have said many times "not that it means a thing"  Kyle was not in charge of the boat.  Nothing was his call, at all.  Just reading the screen.  CAPS is alot of what you'll all never see, because you chose to put his life at risk, by posting everything here on him.  
San   Maybe you need to go hang out with your loser friend ******* a little more............Wow, thats some harsh words there.  Can you prove this, is there a link?And they made you a mod?  Ooops, hurry and erase that!

Texasmom   And I truly hope he's allergic to wool. ........Thats horrible, what a Christian you are.

Always   And Tribro, I am sorry you took my post that way, and yes I'm sorry I posted over there too.......You are sorry?  Why?  
Buckshot   What is your explanation for items located in a crab trap (congruent with the infamous ocean disposal theory) that were inadvertently filmed by the ROV? Why would Aruba seem so quick to want to control its contents...diving from a "police" type boat, retrieving contents, then returning back to the "police" type boat? Then never discussing with others their findings? After all, one of the purposes of the dive was to locate a missing trap on the ocean floor, which possibly could contain evidence of a crime against NH? Furthermore, no one has heard the ALE, nor Mos talk about it, either. Seemed like a significant find...Did the suspicious divers have zip-lock baggies in their pockets? The pictures of the cage definitely contained more than just a little piece of fabric...What happened to the other unexplained object(s)? Things that make ya go HMMMMMMMMMMMM...And since some claim to know and communicate to Caps and OE........Things in the trap are things we will never know because of ALE, or maybe we will know because of the FBI crack pot that was on the boat.  But probably not because he was taken off the case, he was a bad seed.  He has been from the beginning.  Who evers call it was to let the ALE take this over made a VERY BAD decision, for sure.  But that wasn't Kyles call.  We don't claim to know these people, WE DO know and talk with these people.  SM people ran them off, and they choose not to come back here.  I can't blame them.  You want them to come back and speak after all you have done to them?  Would you come back if that was done to you after all your hard work?  Hey, I too know how they feel.  You do the same to me, but I am still here defending.  .............
Why have they not bothered to clear the air, if false information was reported?

Any facts (not theory, speculation, or rumor) to discredit the frog?   Oh there is alot of things to discredit someone who called themselves something they are not.
Snoopy   I've just about had enough of the bull-shit. If it continues I'm gonna start talkin.................talk, not too much that hasn't been said already.
Klaas   Evidentally she has chosen not to post here.......... ?

You know, whats on the internet is for public use, we have all said that many times.  So, why is it a big deal that things are taken over to other places?   We are all doing the same thing, and that is investigating the disappearance of Natalee Holloway.  It's just that this group likes who they share with, and that group likes who they share with.  It seems to keep the bickering out of all of it, and thats how it should be.  I don't see you picking on the Goldmonkeys, or BFN, or any of the others out there.  Freebirds are here now, because there is no where else to go.  Either they were kicked outta the Freebirds, OR they have given up and want to take some glory.  Fine, they were good people till all of this.  Lots of respect has been lost due to all that has been said here.   


(http://i34.photobucket.com/albums/d118/Sanddrops/kittycorn.gif)


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #797 1/30/09 -
Post by: Edward on January 31, 2009, 10:07:59 PM
http://www.amigoe.com/artman/publish/printer_52208.php

Google translation:

Aruba
 
Chinese takeover Valero promising


31 Jan, 2009, 14:06 (GMT -04:00)

ORANGE CITY - The odds that China takes over the Valero refinery, is not unlikely, as late as Henri Coffie, former manager of the refinery in San Nicolas know. China, according to him negotiate with Venezuela over the supply of crude oil.
In November, this newspaper has reported on a visit to China Petro Valero after a takeover by Brazil's Petrobras failed. Coffie said in an interview for the World that he has read that the Chinese want to close deals for Venezuelan oil: "It would be an ideal situation if the Chinese would deliver oil to our refinery." The reason why the Chinese would want is for him not entirely clear. "They have the same refineries."
 
Clearly it is the former manager for the Valero refinery in hand to do. "Not so long ago was told that 6 billion dollars is needed for the refinery to restore and investments to make better, more marketable products on the market. Without a partner, there will be no investment and it is viewed. "
According Coffie Venezuela probably has no interest in the refinery: "They have the opportunity for her to take over in 1985 when Lake was close."




These kinds of decisions are not made in a day and they get a lot of advance planning.
Including such things as mapping the ocean floor, as they will need some crude oil to refine, better to have your own crude then to be dependant on others...
MO.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #797 1/30/09 -
Post by: Anna on January 31, 2009, 10:11:28 PM
http://www.amigoe.com/artman/publish/printer_52208.php

Google translation:

Aruba
 
Chinese takeover Valero promising


31 Jan, 2009, 14:06 (GMT -04:00)

ORANGE CITY - The odds that China takes over the Valero refinery, is not unlikely, as late as Henri Coffie, former manager of the refinery in San Nicolas know. China, according to him negotiate with Venezuela over the supply of crude oil.
In November, this newspaper has reported on a visit to China Petro Valero after a takeover by Brazil's Petrobras failed. Coffie said in an interview for the World that he has read that the Chinese want to close deals for Venezuelan oil: "It would be an ideal situation if the Chinese would deliver oil to our refinery." The reason why the Chinese would want is for him not entirely clear. "They have the same refineries."
 
Clearly it is the former manager for the Valero refinery in hand to do. "Not so long ago was told that 6 billion dollars is needed for the refinery to restore and investments to make better, more marketable products on the market. Without a partner, there will be no investment and it is viewed. "
According Coffie Venezuela probably has no interest in the refinery: "They have the opportunity for her to take over in 1985 when Lake was close."




These kinds of decisions are not made in a day and they get a lot of advance planning.
Including such things as mapping the ocean floor, as they will need some crude oil to refine, better to have your own crude then to be dependant on others...
MO.

Yes, indeed, there could be many commercial uses for a map of the ocean floor in that part of the world these days.  The ChiComs, the Russians and the Arubans for that natural gas line from Chavez.

And that's not to mention any others interested that we have not even considered or heard about.



Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #797 1/30/09 -
Post by: Hotshot on January 31, 2009, 10:14:55 PM

Quote
Hotshot...I used to have respect for You but now all I have for You is revulsion...Who the hell do You think You are...Telling anyone to be ashamed of theirselves...Just look at Yourself in this picture...there is absolutely no excuse to be in an embrace with SC unless You will stoop to anything to get what You want...Disgusting absolutely disgusting...
 

Hotping, you wouldn't know the first thing about getiing up and going somewhere to go and help.  From the beginning I have been one of the people who had befriended the suspects.  (as shown in the picture)  in person, and online with many more then just SC.  I was a new face to Aruba, and I took the chance to go and look for answers.  I don't see you bashing RED for the picture with Renfro.  Same thing my friend, same thing.  But thats OK you just keep thinking the way you do, it will get you far.

Anna, I'd rather not talk about that here.  contact me if you wish.

Ahhhh the other frog, is here I see.  Hi Mia  <<<waving>>>


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #797 1/30/09 -
Post by: Anna on January 31, 2009, 10:14:58 PM
Hotshot,
Did Lala's tell you I reported her to the FBI or did you make that up all on your own?

It's a lie and you very likely know that.  The FBI is not interested in Internet forums.  They are in other things though.


BUMP


.



I want to know your source for lying about me, Kathy.  And why you are suddenly so interested in me when I have hardly ever even posted one word to you of any kind until you attacked me.

And by the way, there is no glory in this tragedy.  Only one sick puppy would think there was and make such a statement.  Is that what you are after with inserting yourself in this even when it is totally inappropriate to do so?

If it is, I have some very bad news for you.  And just what is it that you have accomplished with all your theatrics anyway? 


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #797 1/30/09 -
Post by: 2NJSons_Mom on January 31, 2009, 10:15:30 PM
Quote
author=texasmom link=topic=4460.msg654345#msg654345 date=1233457061]
Do you all remember when SM came to life?  We were all nice, everyone had their own ideas, and shared.  It was OK back then.  Now look below as to some of the nasty things people have to say HERE years later.  My answers in purple.

blue moon   Brinkman probably at this moment belongs the the CnG site. Appears everyone does, why not him?......Why are you so jealous?  Because they didn't ask you to join?   
Lady Devon   Since I seldom post and won't suffer if I am banned or reprimanded , I will say to Idstlou, "Enough!" Be silent long enough to read what others have shared with you, take the time to READ EVERY WORD......We have read every word a million times plus with the way some repeatedly post here.  It's not going to change a thing.   I have said many times "not that it means a thing"  Kyle was not in charge of the boat.  Nothing was his call, at all.  Just reading the screen.  CAPS is alot of what you'll all never see, because you chose to put his life at risk, by posting everything here on him.  
San   Maybe you need to go hang out with your loser friend ******* a little more............Wow, thats some harsh words there.  Can you prove this, is there a link?And they made you a mod?  Ooops, hurry and erase that!

Texasmom   And I truly hope he's allergic to wool. ........Thats horrible, what a Christian you are.

Always   And Tribro, I am sorry you took my post that way, and yes I'm sorry I posted over there too.......You are sorry?  Why?  
Buckshot   What is your explanation for items located in a crab trap (congruent with the infamous ocean disposal theory) that were inadvertently filmed by the ROV? Why would Aruba seem so quick to want to control its contents...diving from a "police" type boat, retrieving contents, then returning back to the "police" type boat? Then never discussing with others their findings? After all, one of the purposes of the dive was to locate a missing trap on the ocean floor, which possibly could contain evidence of a crime against NH? Furthermore, no one has heard the ALE, nor Mos talk about it, either. Seemed like a significant find...Did the suspicious divers have zip-lock baggies in their pockets? The pictures of the cage definitely contained more than just a little piece of fabric...What happened to the other unexplained object(s)? Things that make ya go HMMMMMMMMMMMM...And since some claim to know and communicate to Caps and OE........Things in the trap are things we will never know because of ALE, or maybe we will know because of the FBI crack pot that was on the boat.  But probably not because he was taken off the case, he was a bad seed.  He has been from the beginning.  Who evers call it was to let the ALE take this over made a VERY BAD decision, for sure.  But that wasn't Kyles call.  We don't claim to know these people, WE DO know and talk with these people.  SM people ran them off, and they choose not to come back here.  I can't blame them.  You want them to come back and speak after all you have done to them?  Would you come back if that was done to you after all your hard work?  Hey, I too know how they feel.  You do the same to me, but I am still here defending.  .............
Why have they not bothered to clear the air, if false information was reported?

Any facts (not theory, speculation, or rumor) to discredit the frog?   Oh there is alot of things to discredit someone who called themselves something they are not.
Snoopy   I've just about had enough of the bull-shit. If it continues I'm gonna start talkin.................talk, not too much that hasn't been said already.
Klaas   Evidentally she has chosen not to post here.......... ?

You know, whats on the internet is for public use, we have all said that many times.  So, why is it a big deal that things are taken over to other places?   We are all doing the same thing, and that is investigating the disappearance of Natalee Holloway.  It's just that this group likes who they share with, and that group likes who they share with.  It seems to keep the bickering out of all of it, and thats how it should be.  I don't see you picking on the Goldmonkeys, or BFN, or any of the others out there.  Freebirds are here now, because there is no where else to go.  Either they were kicked outta the Freebirds, OR they have given up and want to take some glory.  Fine, they were good people till all of this.  Lots of respect has been lost due to all that has been said here.   


Yup, you would be the one to post something like this.  Once again jealousy will get you nowhere fast.  At least you know I went to Aruba to get info.  Alot more then what you have done.  Ohhhhh Call out the frog...I smell her coming!  Or call out the newbie frog.

I am so sick of you bringing up your going to Aruba.  We KNOW you went, but it seems you want some kind of freakin' medal.  How dare you weigh what you've done against someone else here & say you've done more.  If it was done for justice for Natalee then shut you mouth.  Bastibro said something about Kermit and illuded to his/her not being humble and wanting praise.  Ummmmm, what the hell are you doing? 

 ::MonkeyNoNo::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #797 1/30/09 -
Post by: Kermit on January 31, 2009, 10:16:54 PM

Yup, you would be the one to post something like this.  Once again jealousy will get you nowhere fast.  At least you know I went to Aruba to get info.  Alot more then what you have done.  Ohhhhh Call out the frog...I smell her coming!  Or call out the newbie frog.

You rang!


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #797 1/30/09 -
Post by: crazybabyborg on January 31, 2009, 10:17:05 PM
(http://i25.photobucket.com/albums/c100/crazybabyborgs/express/valium-kitty3.gif)

( I'm on a diet )


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #797 1/30/09 -
Post by: klaasend on January 31, 2009, 10:17:47 PM

Quote
Hotshot...I used to have respect for You but now all I have for You is revulsion...Who the hell do You think You are...Telling anyone to be ashamed of theirselves...Just look at Yourself in this picture...there is absolutely no excuse to be in an embrace with SC unless You will stoop to anything to get what You want...Disgusting absolutely disgusting...
 

Hotping, you wouldn't know the first thing about getiing up and going somewhere to go and help.  From the beginning I have been one of the people who had befriended the suspects.  (as shown in the picture)  in person, and online with many more then just SC.  I was a new face to Aruba, and I took the chance to go and look for answers.  I don't see you bashing RED for the picture with Renfro.  Same thing my friend, same thing.  But thats OK you just keep thinking the way you do, it will get you far.

Anna, I'd rather not talk about that here.  contact me if you wish.

Ahhhh the other frog, is here I see.  Hi Mia  <<<waving>>>


Hotshot - there's a difference between having you photo taken with a reporter and one of the suspects in the case.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #797 1/30/09 -
Post by: hotping on January 31, 2009, 10:18:03 PM

Quote
Hotshot...I used to have respect for You but now all I have for You is revulsion...Who the hell do You think You are...Telling anyone to be ashamed of theirselves...Just look at Yourself in this picture...there is absolutely no excuse to be in an embrace with SC unless You will stoop to anything to get what You want...Disgusting absolutely disgusting...
 

Hotping, you wouldn't know the first thing about getiing up and going somewhere to go and help.  From the beginning I have been one of the people who had befriended the suspects.  (as shown in the picture)  in person, and online with many more then just SC.  I was a new face to Aruba, and I took the chance to go and look for answers.  I don't see you bashing RED for the picture with Renfro.  Same thing my friend, same thing.  But thats OK you just keep thinking the way you do, it will get you far.

Anna, I'd rather not talk about that here.  contact me if you wish.

Ahhhh the other frog, is here I see.  Hi Mia  <<<waving>>>

You are truly sick Hotshot...And by the way... KMA!


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #797 1/30/09 -
Post by: Kermit on January 31, 2009, 10:19:44 PM
Hotshot
Re: Natalee Case Discussion #792 1/9/09 -
« Reply #835 on: January 13, 2009, 10:04:13 AM »

I dont need to prove things to you.  I told you I got CAPS to silvetti, I got CAPS to DAVE.....  then later on CAPS gave me Silvettis number.  That is all there is to it.  I didnt inject myself, I got them in touch with who they needed to get in touch with.  Not a big deal.
http://scaredmonkeys.net/index.php?topic=4363.msg624464#msg624464

me thinks another lie is told

lalasmom emailed Dave to get him to contact Caps.
not Hotshot

Dont' make me post the sucker cuz I will




Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #797 1/30/09 -
Post by: Anna on January 31, 2009, 10:20:20 PM

Quote
Hotshot...I used to have respect for You but now all I have for You is revulsion...Who the hell do You think You are...Telling anyone to be ashamed of theirselves...Just look at Yourself in this picture...there is absolutely no excuse to be in an embrace with SC unless You will stoop to anything to get what You want...Disgusting absolutely disgusting...
 

Hotping, you wouldn't know the first thing about getiing up and going somewhere to go and help.  From the beginning I have been one of the people who had befriended the suspects.  (as shown in the picture)  in person, and online with many more then just SC.  I was a new face to Aruba, and I took the chance to go and look for answers.  I don't see you bashing RED for the picture with Renfro.  Same thing my friend, same thing.  But thats OK you just keep thinking the way you do, it will get you far.

Anna, I'd rather not talk about that here.  contact me if you wish.

Ahhhh the other frog, is here I see.  Hi Mia  <<<waving>>>



What in hell do you mean you would rather not talk about that here?

You are the bitch who posted those lies about me right here and NOW you don't want to talk about it here?

You already did talk about it here and now I want you to answer me here.  NO!  I DO NOT WANT ANY PERSONAL CONTACT WITH YOU AT ALL!  EVER!  GET THAT STRAIGHT, TOO!  And I think you know why.

Here is where you posted your lie and here is where I want an answer. 

And be very, very careful, Kathy.  I am NONE of your business whatsoever.  Keep that in mind, mkay???




Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #797 1/30/09 -
Post by: Blue Moon on January 31, 2009, 10:20:55 PM

Yup, you would be the one to post something like this.  Once again jealousy will get you nowhere fast.  At least you know I went to Aruba to get info.  Alot more then what you have done.  Ohhhhh Call out the frog...I smell her coming!  Or call out the newbie frog.

You rang!

 :salut:


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #797 1/30/09 -
Post by: texasmom on January 31, 2009, 10:21:32 PM
Quote
Yup, you would be the one to post something like this.  Once again jealousy will get you nowhere fast.  At least you know I went to Aruba to get info.  Alot more then what you have done.  Ohhhhh Call out the frog...I smell her coming!  Or call out the newbie frog.

Jealous of this?  Of your being thisclose to Steve Croes?  NOT.  

(http://photos1.blogger.com/blogger/7977/1351/400/Kathy%20and%20Steve.0.jpg)

Just what bombshell information did you get from that close encounter?  If anything at all came of it other than your disgracing yourself; I haven't heard about it.  Yeah, you really DID SOMETHING there Hotshot...keep telling yourself that.

How much further were you/are you willing to go?

  ::MonkeyNoNo::



Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #797 1/30/09 -
Post by: AZSunny on January 31, 2009, 10:22:00 PM
I'm never affraid to admit when I'm wrong.  I have been wrong about alot of people over the last 4 years.  I was wrong about Bondia/Renfro when she was posting at SM.  I was wrong in the first week of this case giving ALE the benefit of the doubt. 

Me neither.  If I am ever wrong ... I will be be first to admit it.

 ::MonkeyHaHa::

My quiet hubby thinks I am perfect.  When "we" have a dispute ... it is always one sided.  I say what is on my mind.  Hubby then looks up from watching the TV ... looks me in the eye and responds ...  "ya ya, and you are just perfect".

What else can I say.

 ::cartwheel::

Janet

Janet,

You made me laugh out loud.  When my late husband listened to me 'rant' on about something, he never said a word, he would wait until I finished, and then he would say.  OK, I hope you feel better now, are you done yet? 


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #797 1/30/09 -
Post by: wreck on January 31, 2009, 10:22:54 PM
Are you drunker tonight than when you were groping SC??????????  ::MonkeyCool::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #797 1/30/09 -
Post by: Kermit on January 31, 2009, 10:23:00 PM
(http://photos1.blogger.com/blogger/7977/1351/400/Kathy%20and%20Steve.0.jpg)
I think I see his fingers in her armpits.



Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #797 1/30/09 -
Post by: hotping on January 31, 2009, 10:24:35 PM
(http://photos1.blogger.com/blogger/7977/1351/400/Kathy%20and%20Steve.0.jpg)
I think I see his fingers in her armpits.


Nasty...Ain't She!


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #797 1/30/09 -
Post by: Kermit on January 31, 2009, 10:24:50 PM
bastibro,

Trying to insult or insinuate that Blonde calls Reality all the time is a lie.

You owe her an apology.




Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #797 1/30/09 -
Post by: Kermit on January 31, 2009, 10:25:09 PM
(http://photos1.blogger.com/blogger/7977/1351/400/Kathy%20and%20Steve.0.jpg)
I think I see his fingers in her armpits.


Nasty...Ain't She!

Pitiful.



Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #797 1/30/09 -
Post by: Monkey Mia on January 31, 2009, 10:25:40 PM
I had many nice welcomes yesterday.  Thank you to all for the warm greetings. 

Hotshot, you are rude and crude and you need to learn some manners.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #797 1/30/09 -
Post by: Magnolia on January 31, 2009, 10:26:12 PM
(http://photos1.blogger.com/blogger/7977/1351/400/Kathy%20and%20Steve.0.jpg)
I think I see his fingers in her armpits.



Eeewwwww!


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #797 1/30/09 -
Post by: Kermit on January 31, 2009, 10:26:38 PM
Ahhhh the other frog, is here I see.  Hi Mia  <<<waving>>>
http://scaredmonkeys.net/index.php?topic=4460.new#new

Okay I'll bite. What does that mean?


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #797 1/30/09 -
Post by: Kermit on January 31, 2009, 10:27:45 PM
I had many nice welcomes yesterday.  Thank you to all for the warm greetings. 

Hotshot, you are rude and crude and you need to learn some manners.

ribbit to Miss Monkey Mia.

Are you a frog? What did hotshot mean?
Sorry, if it is an inside thing, I don't know.



Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #797 1/30/09 -
Post by: Anna on January 31, 2009, 10:28:32 PM
How is it helpful for a person to go to Aruba and make a tremendous fool of themself?  How does that find Natalee?  The look on Steve Croes face says it all.



Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #797 1/30/09 -
Post by: hotping on January 31, 2009, 10:28:33 PM
I had many nice welcomes yesterday.  Thank you to all for the warm greetings. 

Hotshot, you are rude and crude and you need to learn some manners.
And She needs to have Her head examined...And a Hotshot She Ain't!  ::MonkeyWink::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #797 1/30/09 -
Post by: Anna on January 31, 2009, 10:32:14 PM

Quote
Hotshot...I used to have respect for You but now all I have for You is revulsion...Who the hell do You think You are...Telling anyone to be ashamed of theirselves...Just look at Yourself in this picture...there is absolutely no excuse to be in an embrace with SC unless You will stoop to anything to get what You want...Disgusting absolutely disgusting...
 

Hotping, you wouldn't know the first thing about getiing up and going somewhere to go and help.  From the beginning I have been one of the people who had befriended the suspects.  (as shown in the picture)  in person, and online with many more then just SC.  I was a new face to Aruba, and I took the chance to go and look for answers.  I don't see you bashing RED for the picture with Renfro.  Same thing my friend, same thing.  But thats OK you just keep thinking the way you do, it will get you far.

Anna, I'd rather not talk about that here.  contact me if you wish.

Ahhhh the other frog, is here I see.  Hi Mia  <<<waving>>>



What in hell do you mean you would rather not talk about that here?

You are the bitch who posted those lies about me right here and NOW you don't want to talk about it here?

You already did talk about it here and now I want you to answer me here.  NO!  I DO NOT WANT ANY PERSONAL CONTACT WITH YOU AT ALL!  EVER!  GET THAT STRAIGHT, TOO!  And I think you know why.

Here is where you posted your lie and here is where I want an answer. 

And be very, very careful, Kathy.  I am NONE of your business whatsoever.  Keep that in mind, mkay???






So you think you are entitled to come here and post bold faced lies about me with complete impunity?


Guess again!

I want to know if Lala's told you that I reported her to the FBI or did she not tell you this.  If she did not, why are you posting such a thing.


YOU brought it here and YOU answer me HERE!


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #797 1/30/09 -
Post by: Keepthefaith on January 31, 2009, 10:32:42 PM
OK.I'm back.Had to go to the Daughter's basketball game!She made her first shot.On page 31 so i will catch up and see you all in a minute! ::MonkeyDance::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #797 1/30/09 -
Post by: Monkey Mia on January 31, 2009, 10:32:43 PM
Hello Kermit, thank you for the welcome.  I have no idea what Hotshot is talking about but I find it insulting.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #797 1/30/09 -
Post by: crazybabyborg on January 31, 2009, 10:33:36 PM
I had many nice welcomes yesterday.  Thank you to all for the warm greetings. 

Hotshot, you are rude and crude and you need to learn some manners.

I'm sorry I missed you, mia! Let me add my own welcome to the others!

 


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #797 1/30/09 -
Post by: Monkey Mia on January 31, 2009, 10:36:07 PM
That is beautiful CBB.  Thank you.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #797 1/30/09 -
Post by: Anna on January 31, 2009, 10:36:16 PM

Welcome, Mia!  Sorry the cage is in such a state right now.  We have major disruptions.



CBB---That is so pretty!

 


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #797 1/30/09 -
Post by: Kermit on January 31, 2009, 10:36:33 PM
Hello Kermit, thank you for the welcome.  I have no idea what Hotshot is talking about but I find it insulting.

I kind of think she was trying to insinuate you were part of the frog family.
But I see you are a little Monkey Mia.
So welcome.



Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #797 1/30/09 -
Post by: texasmom on January 31, 2009, 10:36:55 PM

Welcome Monkey Mia!   ::MonkeyDance::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #797 1/30/09 -
Post by: always 1 on January 31, 2009, 10:38:36 PM
Welcome Mia.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #797 1/30/09 -
Post by: Blue Moon on January 31, 2009, 10:40:10 PM
How's your day Kermit?  Don't think anyone wants to talk face to face with you today.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #797 1/30/09 -
Post by: Monkey Mia on January 31, 2009, 10:40:52 PM
Thank you Anna and Texasmom.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #797 1/30/09 -
Post by: Kermit on January 31, 2009, 10:42:06 PM

Take it easy Kermit!Janet is already feeling Hinky from the green tea and with added praise from you.who know's what comes next........ ::MonkeyHaHa::

Janet is hinky.
Does Mister Veggie know? ::MonkeyTongue::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #797 1/30/09 -
Post by: Anna on January 31, 2009, 10:42:28 PM

Quote
Hotshot...I used to have respect for You but now all I have for You is revulsion...Who the hell do You think You are...Telling anyone to be ashamed of theirselves...Just look at Yourself in this picture...there is absolutely no excuse to be in an embrace with SC unless You will stoop to anything to get what You want...Disgusting absolutely disgusting...
 

Hotping, you wouldn't know the first thing about getiing up and going somewhere to go and help.  From the beginning I have been one of the people who had befriended the suspects.  (as shown in the picture)  in person, and online with many more then just SC.  I was a new face to Aruba, and I took the chance to go and look for answers.  I don't see you bashing RED for the picture with Renfro.  Same thing my friend, same thing.  But thats OK you just keep thinking the way you do, it will get you far.

Anna, I'd rather not talk about that here.  contact me if you wish.

Ahhhh the other frog, is here I see.  Hi Mia  <<<waving>>>



What in hell do you mean you would rather not talk about that here?

You are the bitch who posted those lies about me right here and NOW you don't want to talk about it here?

You already did talk about it here and now I want you to answer me here.  NO!  I DO NOT WANT ANY PERSONAL CONTACT WITH YOU AT ALL!  EVER!  GET THAT STRAIGHT, TOO!  And I think you know why.

Here is where you posted your lie and here is where I want an answer. 

And be very, very careful, Kathy.  I am NONE of your business whatsoever.  Keep that in mind, mkay???






So you think you are entitled to come here and post bold faced lies about me with complete impunity?


Guess again!

I want to know if Lala's told you that I reported her to the FBI or did she not tell you this.  If she did not, why are you posting such a thing.


YOU brought it here and YOU answer me HERE!


BUMP   BUMP    BUMP    BUMP    BUMP


I'm waiting, Kathy, for you to answer me if Lala's told you I reported her to the FBI or not? 

YOU BROUGHT IT HERE, NOT ME>

And you have gone much too far already and you know it. 
Too late.

Now the least you can do is answer my question about the lies you posted about me right here, on this very forum.



Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #797 1/30/09 -
Post by: Magnolia on January 31, 2009, 10:42:36 PM
Kermit, want me to knit you some goat socks for your
froggie legs?


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #797 1/30/09 -
Post by: Monkey Mia on January 31, 2009, 10:42:37 PM
Thank you always 1.

Kermit, if no one wants to talk face to face with you today, just join me in the water.  We can swim.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #797 1/30/09 -
Post by: Kermit on January 31, 2009, 10:42:56 PM
How's your day Kermit?  Don't think anyone wants to talk face to face with you today.

Hotshot probably ran off to get her poop suit.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #797 1/30/09 -
Post by: always 1 on January 31, 2009, 10:43:13 PM
I had many nice welcomes yesterday.  Thank you to all for the warm greetings. 

Hotshot, you are rude and crude and you need to learn some manners.

ribbit to Miss Monkey Mia.

Are you a frog? What did hotshot mean?
Sorry, if it is an inside thing, I don't know.


Hello Kermie.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #797 1/30/09 -
Post by: Tamikosmom on January 31, 2009, 10:43:32 PM


Things in the trap are things we will never know because of ALE, or maybe we will know because of the FBI crack pot that was on the boat.  But probably not because he was taken off the case, he was a bad seed.  He has been from the beginning.  Who evers call it was to let the ALE take this over made a VERY BAD decision, for sure.  But that wasn't Kyles call.  We don't claim to know these people, WE DO know and talk with these people.  SM people ran them off, and they choose not to come back here.  I can't blame them.  You want them to come back and speak after all you have done to them?  Would you come back if that was done to you after all your hard work?  Hey, I too know how they feel.  You do the same to me, but I am still here defending.  


Hotshot ... who informed you that there was an FBI ******* on board the Persistence on January 7th, 2008 ... the day that the contents of the cage were recovered by the Aruban divers?

At no time did Kyle Kingman in his own words to the Natalee's Freebirds' site or the SM site ... indicate that a FBI ******* was a participant in the recovery process.

Janet

++++++++


jen3560
Re: Natalee Case Discussion #787 12/24/08 -
« Reply #586 on: December 30, 2008, 09:37:57 PM »


The DID have a choice.  A representative from the FBI could have been aboard the Persistence to retain their initially granted "*******" role in this investigation- instead, the Persistence had a film crew aboard.  Who they (John Silvetti) then proceeded to remove from the boat before the Dec 30 dive, along with Tim Miller.

http://scaredmonkeys.net/index.php?topic=4269.msg603761#msg603761


++++++++


KYLE KINGMAN - IN HIS OWN WORDS

Kyle:  John is not a believer in the trap. He took ALE's word as gospel that it wasn't case related, yet never studied the videos or bothered to inquire further. He had plans on doing business with Aruba and in S. America and he didn't want to hurt any feelings by talks hinting at lack of complete trust and friendship.

Kyle:  I took the proportions of the body form from the head, to shoulder, to a 90 degree angle which I believed to be the hem line of Natalee's skirt. I then took those proportions and matched them to the photo of Natalee with what she was last seen wearing. The proportions matched within an inch from head, to shoulder, to skirt line. Based on this comparison and with what we believed we saw in the Dec 29th video, Tim Miller contacted the family and told them the 99.9% comment. I told Tim not to do anything until we have forensic results back after the site is processed. Jan 7th we sampled the contents and in my opinion we found the skirt under the sand along with the other items The blue fabric was found right where the skirt is pictured. If it isn't her, it will forever haunt me as a major cosmic WTF.

Kyle:   John didn't want Tim Miller on board the Persistence because he said Tim wasn't necessary any more and was a liability.

Kyle:   He (Tim Miller) stepped off on or about the 1st of Jan to follow up on the false lead in Costa Rica IIRC.

Kyle:    The Persistence had no divers on the 7th. Tim Trahan was our diver on the 30th-Dec, but he was out of the country at the time. The Aruban divers were on the police boat, dove from their boat, and returned to their boat.
 
Kyle:  They were immediately whisked away by the Aruban police and not seen of again by us on the 7th.

Kyle:  I get done in the survey room backing up the ROV dive and head to the back deck to talk to the Polis divers and see what they sampled and see the Polis boat way in the distance heading away fast. John doesn't seem concerned at all, but I am very dissapointed, concerned, and burning inside because I have a feeling that I/we will never know what they took from the trap. That evening I talked to John asking when we plan on recovering the trap. Previously this was part of the talks and plan, but this time he doesn't seem concerned about ever looking into the trap further. After John verbally BASHED me about the trap for what I said to Tim Miller about the sand body-form and that I believed her skirt was under the sand, John pretty much committed himself to the belief the trap wasn't what we were after. This shocked me because it was exactly what we were looking for- a fish trap lost at sea with human remains.

Kyle:  I did not feel the same and we had a major difference in opinion. He [John Silvetti] was the one who never pressed ALE to be completely open with us with the trap evidence. I would have forced them to. However, John was the one paying my invoices so I was forced to sit back and hope for the best.

Kyle:   John definitely believed the Arubans at their every word.

Kyle: Remember after the Jan-7th dive which sampled the trap Richardson told John emphatically to "keep searching she's still out there in the deep ocean".

Kyle: John Silvetti told me today that he may be returning to Aruba very soon for a few days. (05/08/08)

Kyle: He's [John Silvetti] seriously making plans to open an Aruba office so he can conduct business easier in S. America and that would allow him to do that. (06/10/08)

++++++++

Tamikosmom
Re: Natalee Case Discussion #744 3/19 -
« Reply #191 on: March 19, 2008, 07:59:59 PM »


Hi Kyle.  It's me ... Tamikosmom ... your worst nightmare.

I sincerely tried to spare you from my prying questions but ... I lack self discipline ... I am so nosy.

Were any members of the Persistence present when the Arubans took possessin of the contents of the cage/trap?  Were the contents itemized ... photos taken?  Was an authorized receipt obtained?

In other words ... was there an official chain of command that went from the Persistence to the Arubans or ... did the Persistence not have any control?

Janet

http://scaredmonkeys.net/index.php?topic=2721.180


oceanexploration
Re: Natalee Case Discussion #744 3/19 -
« Reply #201 on: March 19, 2008, 08:21:47 PM »


Janet, you aren't even a bad dream, let alone a nightmare.  We had little option other than to have the Aruban dive division recover the samples and bring them back under their care.  Remember we are Americans working in Aruban waters, subject to their laws, invitation, and blessing.  Our hands are tied for the most part. I personally was extremely uncomfortable with the chain of custody, being that we weren't a part of it, but I was powerless to do anything about it.   The samples were photographed in detail by one Aruban diver and the other two investigated the contents of the trap, the dimensions, the rigging, and what surrounded the trap.  From the video, it looked like they did a diligent and careful job with the samples and the underwater photography.  I don't know who has these pictures, but I must assume ALE.

http://scaredmonkeys.net/index.php?topic=2721.200






Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #797 1/30/09 -
Post by: Kermit on January 31, 2009, 10:43:37 PM
Kermit, want me to knit you some goat socks for your
froggie legs?

awwww that is so sweet.
I'm a size small.



Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #797 1/30/09 -
Post by: billb's daughter on January 31, 2009, 10:43:52 PM
Where did Hotshot go? I'm all ready for scrolling...scrolling....scrolling....
I learned to master it...even in a poop suit.. ::MonkeyCool::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #797 1/30/09 -
Post by: San on January 31, 2009, 10:44:39 PM
Magnolia would you like some of my popcorn.  I will only share it with you if you knit me a goat wool hat.  ::MonkeyHaHa::

(http://i34.photobucket.com/albums/d118/Sanddrops/kittycorn.gif)


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #797 1/30/09 -
Post by: Anna on January 31, 2009, 10:45:04 PM
Welcome Mia.


 ::MonkeyHaHa:: ::MonkeyHaHa:: ::MonkeyHaHa::


I think we are scaring the children!

Sorry, Always1.  Not very pleasant, I know, but it seems to be the only way to deal with some shameless people.  They just won't be reasonable and won't respond to normal dialog.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #797 1/30/09 -
Post by: Blue Moon on January 31, 2009, 10:45:22 PM
How's your day Kermit?  Don't think anyone wants to talk face to face with you today.

Hotshot probably ran off to get her poop suit.


I have a feeling as long as you are here she want be.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #797 1/30/09 -
Post by: iris44 on January 31, 2009, 10:45:30 PM
Has anyone heard of or done any research on Casey Cundieff (or his dad) from Captain Elliott's?  Has it already been discussed here that Schaeffer had purchased Aruban businesses? 
Can you fill us in? I think you have told us that you have some personal knowledge of John and/or Louis. I would be interested in pursuing ANY angle you might feel relevant.

I have no personal knowledge of anyone at SM or the Persistence or the family.  I read the article that lifesong brought forward a few pages back.  I had a big "lightbulb" moment when I read about the connection of Schaefer to purchasing the fishing boat company.  I thought that could explain the Caps connection and how Caps would know where to dive to see the cage.  Maybe Caps is one of the fishing boat company employees or owner.  Or maybe you have all already discussed that and I missed it.  I'm not trying to "out" Caps.  I was just very surprised to read that Schaefer bought those Aruban businesses around the same time as the sea search.

I have to go take care of the real "Iris" and her friends now. (mucking stalls and riding).  I'll check in later.

I don't think that would be Caps connection to Schaeffer.  Hotshot said she is the one who introduced Caps to Schaefer.   I do find it curious what was happening during the time Schaeffer and Salvetti decided to take that boat trip to Aruba.  What with all the goings on here in the U.S. with bankrupties, stock tanking.  Alot was happening with that company and then he ups and goes to Aruba looking for Natalee.  I am extremely grateful as I am sure the family is that they made that trip but the outcome I am sure was not what anyone expected.  Any connections to Aruba to me sends out bad vibs and should make anyone suspicious of their actual goal in the search.


Hotshot
Re: Natalee Case Discussion #792 1/9/09 -
« Reply #835 on: January 13, 2009, 10:04:13 AM »


I dont need to prove things to you.  I told you I got CAPS to silvetti, I got CAPS to DAVE.....  then later on CAPS gave me Silvettis number.  That is all there is to it.  I didnt inject myself, I got them in touch with who they needed to get in touch with.  Not a big deal. 

http://scaredmonkeys.net/index.php?topic=4363.msg624464#msg624464


Thanks everyone, for the responses. 


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #797 1/30/09 -
Post by: San on January 31, 2009, 10:45:49 PM
Kermit, want me to knit you some goat socks for your
froggie legs?

Oh now I'm jealous  ::MonkeyHaHa::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #797 1/30/09 -
Post by: texasmom on January 31, 2009, 10:46:27 PM
Where did Hotshot go? I'm all ready for scrolling...scrolling....scrolling....
I learned to master it...even in a poop suit.. ::MonkeyCool::

It's about time you got here billb!   ::MonkeyDance::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #797 1/30/09 -
Post by: Kermit on January 31, 2009, 10:47:27 PM
How's your day Kermit?  Don't think anyone wants to talk face to face with you today.

Hotshot probably ran off to get her poop suit.


I have a feeling as long as you are here she want be.


Maybe she had the poops.



Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #797 1/30/09 -
Post by: hotping on January 31, 2009, 10:48:08 PM
How's your day Kermit?  Don't think anyone wants to talk face to face with you today.

Hotshot probably ran off to get her poop suit.

She needs more than a poop suit after some of the things She's done She needs a straight jacket...JMO


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #797 1/30/09 -
Post by: Kermit on January 31, 2009, 10:48:17 PM
Welcome Mia.


 ::MonkeyHaHa:: ::MonkeyHaHa:: ::MonkeyHaHa::


I think we are scaring the children!

Sorry, Always1.  Not very pleasant, I know, but it seems to be the only way to deal with some shameless people.  They just won't be reasonable and won't respond to normal dialog.

She needs to act her age, not her shoe size.

 ::MonkeyLaugh::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #797 1/30/09 -
Post by: Tamikosmom on January 31, 2009, 10:49:44 PM
Kermit, want me to knit you some goat socks for your
froggie legs?

Magnolia ... you have not yet finished knitting my sweater.  Kermit arrives on the scene and ... "Kermit, want me to knit you some goat socks for your froggie legs?"

Kermit lives in the southern US.  I live north of the Canadian border.  Just think about it.

 ::MonkeyNoNo::

Hi Kermit!!!

Janet



Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #797 1/30/09 -
Post by: Kermit on January 31, 2009, 10:49:48 PM
Thank you always 1.

Kermit, if no one wants to talk face to face with you today, just join me in the water.  We can swim.

I lurvs a good pond.



Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #797 1/30/09 -
Post by: Blue Moon on January 31, 2009, 10:49:53 PM
How's your day Kermit?  Don't think anyone wants to talk face to face with you today.

Hotshot probably ran off to get her poop suit.


I have a feeling as long as you are here she want be.


Maybe she had the poops.



The minute you popped in she was like "OH CHIT".


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #797 1/30/09 -
Post by: Anna on January 31, 2009, 10:50:17 PM
When someone comes here and posts specific bold faced lies about me and makes accusations, I feel I have every right to ask for the source of these lies.

And why not disucss it right here where the lies were told in the first place and with the person who told them?

But as usual, no response.  That's because there is none.  The behavior of some of these disgruntled people is way over the top.  They try to take things to a new level constantly.

It's better to confront them right on the spot.  If you try to be polite it goes right over their head and is a wasted effort. 

So I do hope anyone who read the original lies sees the response I get when I ask for clarification and can figure this out for themselves.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #797 1/30/09 -
Post by: Kermit on January 31, 2009, 10:50:59 PM
Kermit, want me to knit you some goat socks for your
froggie legs?

Magnolia ... you have not yet finished knitting my sweater.  Kermit arrives on the scene and ... "Kermit, want me to knit you some goat socks for your froggie legs?"

Kermit lives in the southern US.  I live north of the Canadian border.  Just think about it.

 ::MonkeyNoNo::

Hi Kermit!!!

Janet



colder then a frogs tit in Canada.



Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #797 1/30/09 -
Post by: Blue Moon on January 31, 2009, 10:52:40 PM
Kermit,  do you know anything about an FBI ******* on that ship?  Seems Hotshot thinks there was one on board.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #797 1/30/09 -
Post by: billb's daughter on January 31, 2009, 10:52:48 PM
Where did Hotshot go? I'm all ready for scrolling...scrolling....scrolling....
I learned to master it...even in a poop suit.. ::MonkeyCool::

It's about time you got here billb!   ::MonkeyDance::
Wouldn't miss it......Got a new pooper scooper...


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #797 1/30/09 -
Post by: Kermit on January 31, 2009, 10:52:49 PM
When someone comes here and posts specific bold faced lies about me and makes accusations, I feel I have every right to ask for the source of these lies.

And why not disucss it right here where the lies were told in the first place and with the person who told them?

But as usual, no response.  That's because there is none.  The behavior of some of these disgruntled people is way over the top.  They try to take things to a new level constantly.

It's better to confront them right on the spot.  If you try to be polite it goes right over their head and is a wasted effort. 

So I do hope anyone who read the original lies sees the response I get when I ask for clarification and can figure this out for themselves.

I stand by Anna.



Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #797 1/30/09 -
Post by: Tamikosmom on January 31, 2009, 10:53:48 PM
OK.I'm back.Had to go to the Daughter's basketball game!She made her first shot.On page 31 so i will catch up and see you all in a minute! ::MonkeyDance::

 ::cartwheel::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #797 1/30/09 -
Post by: texasmom on January 31, 2009, 10:54:01 PM
How's your day Kermit?  Don't think anyone wants to talk face to face with you today.

Hotshot probably ran off to get her poop suit.

She needs more than a poop suit after some of the things She's done She needs a straight jacket...JMO

And probably some of this....for the cooties.

(http://ace.imageg.net/graphics/product_images/pACE2-1122323reg.jpg)


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #797 1/30/09 -
Post by: Monkey Mia on January 31, 2009, 10:54:42 PM
Anna, I believe you deserve the courtesy of an answer.  I think we would all like to hear it.  Maybe some day, like when Aruba is honest. 


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #797 1/30/09 -
Post by: San on January 31, 2009, 10:55:01 PM
When someone comes here and posts specific bold faced lies about me and makes accusations, I feel I have every right to ask for the source of these lies.

And why not disucss it right here where the lies were told in the first place and with the person who told them?

But as usual, no response.  That's because there is none.  The behavior of some of these disgruntled people is way over the top.  They try to take things to a new level constantly.

It's better to confront them right on the spot.  If you try to be polite it goes right over their head and is a wasted effort. 
 
So I do hope anyone who read the original lies sees the response I get when I ask for clarification and can figure this out for themselves.

Even when you are nasty it goes over their head and still a wasted effort.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #797 1/30/09 -
Post by: iris44 on January 31, 2009, 10:55:10 PM
http://www.sacramentopress.com/headline/2601/HPI_in_Aruba_In_Search_of_Natalee_Holloway_Part_1

HPI in Aruba: In Search of Natalee Holloway Part 1
by Paul Roberts, published on January 20, 2009 at 7:07PM
Storyline: Paul Dale Roberts: Chronicles of a Ghostwriter/Ghosthunter  Community Tags: dale holloway natalee paul roberts
To see pictures from Aruba, please click on this link:
http://s459.photobucket.com/albums/qq319/HPI_International/HPIAruba/
Now, are you ready for the story? You are? Cool, let's go...

This is the start of my vacation. The day is 12 January 2009. I am headed for Aruba. I stop at Shannon 'Ms. Macabre' McCabe's home, she has offered to drive me to the airport. I tell Shannon, that is really nice that you will drive me to Oakland. She exclaims...Oakland? I thought you were flying out of Sacramento? Paul: No, I said Oakland. Shannon: I can't go to Oakland, I am sorry, I thought you were flying out of Sacramento. Paul: Don't worry about it Shannon, I can get to Oakland by myself. Shannon: I am really sorry man. Paul: Don't sweat it, just make sure to watch my dogs HPI and Pika. Rukesh Kumar, my neighbor will be watching them too, I am glad you and Rukesh have met. Shannon: Don't worry about the dogs Paul, I will even walk them!

Now you are probably wondering why I am headed over to Aruba. I am headed over to Aruba for pleasure and to investigate the disappearance of Natalee Holloway.

Quick History Lesson on Aruba:
The wind-swept island of Aruba was discovered and claimed for Spain in 1499, later acquired by the Dutch in 1636. Aruba was once part of the Netherlands Antilles, but they withdrew and subsequently became an independent member of the kingdom of the Netherlands. At one time oil refining and even gold mining was the major industry in Aruba, but when tourists discovered this island, things for Arubians changed and it changed for the better. This sunshiny place of balmy perfect weather, sandy beaches, duty-free shopping has one of the most fascinating ecosystems on the planet, is surrounded by the warm, aquamarine waters of the Caribbean Sea. Yes, Aruba is paradise.

How Am I Getting There and How Will I Return?
12 Jan: Flight 90 Jet Blue Oakland to New York
13 Jan: Flight 755 Jet Blue New York to Aruba
(Through the Bermuda Triangle)
19 Jan: Flight 744 Jet Blue Aruba to Boston
19 Jan: Flight 477 Jet Blue Boston to Oakland
The Ghost Tracker (my vehicle) is parked at the Oakland International Airport - Economy Parking N6.

Where Will I Be Staying?
Talk of the Town Hotel and Beach Club Room 106

On my way to Aruba, I am cramped in with an older couple. The older guy is right next to me and he is elbowing me throughout the whole trip. Later in the flight, he takes off his shoes and socks and starts fiddling around with his feet. The thoughts in my head were unimaginable. I did everything in my power to hold down my breakfast. I was so happy arriving to Aruba and getting as far away as possible from this guy. When the jet landed, they started playing the Beach Boy's Kokomo song.

The next thing is the fun part, negotiating with taxi drivers on their prices. Finally found a taxi driver with somewhat of a reasonable price. $15.00 cash to get from the airport to my hotel. What the? It was practically an 8 minute ride. Since the taxi driver was not too friendly, I stiffed him a tip. Man, this was one grouchy taxi driver, nice taxi drivers get tips, grouchy ones don't get anything.

I love my hotel, you can feel the island breeze, a cute outdoor patio and bar, beautiful swimming pool and the interior of my hotel room is everything I wanted. Yes, I can see why this hotel is called The Talk of the Town. Big price though, over a thousand bucks for 6 nights. Ouch! Oh well, I am on vacation.

On the first day, I am exhausted and jet lagged, but my curiosity is at an all time high. I want to see the town. On this day, I would check out the Marketplace, Seaport Casino and Parlament di Aruba.

This Tuesday night, I had the pleasure of meeting a gorgeous dark haired Colombian girl named Sandra Osono. Sandra has given me many details of her country in Columbia and why she has moved to Aruba. Sandra was a pleasure to talk to and I will be keeping in touch with Sandra. This night, I would get lost in my thoughts as I listened to the reggae and salsa music at a club called Mambo Jambo and sipping on my pina colada.

It is now Wednesday and I would stop over at the Beach Bar Havana aka The New Havana Beach Bar and Restaurants. This is right across the street from my hotel and to my surprise, the Arubian women are parading around this beach without any tops. I instantly thought, just perhaps, the Arubian women might be poor and are not able to afford a full piece bathing suit, so minus the tops. Perhaps, when I get to America, I will start up a charity for these poor women, so they can have full piece bathing suits and they will not have to walk around the beach without their tops. I felt saddened at their plight.

Today, I would spend much of the day souvenir shopping and when I got hungry I would have some beef chop suey at the Kowloon Restaurant. In a location near the Kowloon Restaurant, I met Sasha (not her real name). She asked why I was walking around taking notes. I explained to her that I have heard stories about a blonde phantom woman that walks the beach of Aruba and some people think it is Natalee Holloway.

I explained that last night, I did go to the beach late at night. A beach location that some people believe that Natalee was taken to and attempted to get some EVPs. Some of the questions I have asked are: Natalee are you here? Natalee if you are here, speak to me. So far, I have not gathered any EVPs. I will continue trying.

Sasha laughed. Sasha: You are a ghosthunter, this is funny. There are many ghosts here in Aruba and many stories. The blonde phantom woman, is probably the Lady of the Mist. The Lady of the Mist is a ghost of a woman, that may have drowned. If you want to know how Natalee died, I know some of Joran's (Joran van der Sloot) circle of friends. I was told that Joran placed some drugs in her drinks and when he got her out to the beach, she went into convulsions. He had one of his friends drop her out in the ocean. Joran was scared when Natalee went into convulsions, because it was his drugs that killed her. Joran could only think of getting rid of any evidence and that was disposing of the body. That is why Joran did not call the cops, he is a coward.

Paul: Sasha, why haven't you told the cops? Sasha: The cops already know and they do nothing. I don't want to be involved and please do not use my name in your article, not my real name, you can call me Sasha, that is okay. Paul: Wow! I was expecting to just try and get some EVPs, I didn't realize I was going to talk to a person that has some inside knowledge.

After my meeting with Sasha, I watched her as she walked into a crowd of people at the local mall and vanished. I can only wonder what other information, I will find while in Aruba?

As I walked back to my hotel, I sort of was in a trance after talking with Sasha. A Mercedes pulls up and a dark haired Arubian girl stops the Mercedes and opens the door and tells me to get in! As I prepared to get in, a horn blows and I realize I was merely daydreaming. The person blowing the horn, was a large old woman in an old beat up Chevy. I was daydreaming the James Bond (Quantum of Solice) scene.

Hey, what do you expect? I am in paradise, the island of dreams...I can daydream a little bit. But, I know that this vacation is becoming an adventure and the night has not even arrived yet.

Okay, the night is here. It's Wednesday night. It's time to get friendly. It's time to interview people. My first interviewee is: Vasilisa Henriquez. Vasilisa verifies the story that Sasha told me and doesn't mind that I use her real name in my article. Vasilisa looks like a model and she has this sweet Jamaican accent. Instead of calling me Paul, she calls me Pol. I like that. Vasilisa Henriquez also tells me that Joran called his father when Natalee supposingly died. It was Joran's father that took Natalee on the boat and dumped her body. This is the story that has been told repeatedly here in Aruba


Great article.  Pretty darn convincing! 


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #797 1/30/09 -
Post by: Kermit on January 31, 2009, 10:55:19 PM
Kermit,  do you know anything about an FBI ******* on that ship?  Seems Hotshot thinks there was one on board.

Jen posted:
A representative from the FBI could have been aboard the Persistence to retain their initially granted "*******" role in this investigation- instead, the Persistence had a film crew aboard.  Who they (John Silvetti) then proceeded to remove from the boat before the Dec 30 dive, along with Tim Miller.

http://scaredmonkeys.net/index.php?topic=4269.msg603761#msg603761
http://scaredmonkeys.net/index.php?topic=4460.new#new

FBI to my knowledge were not on board.
FBI did not know about the photos - per Jug through the leak.




Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #797 1/30/09 -
Post by: Anna on January 31, 2009, 10:55:54 PM
Kermit, want me to knit you some goat socks for your
froggie legs?

Magnolia ... you have not yet finished knitting my sweater.  Kermit arrives on the scene and ... "Kermit, want me to knit you some goat socks for your froggie legs?"

Kermit lives in the southern US.  I live north of the Canadian border.  Just think about it.

 ::MonkeyNoNo::

Hi Kermit!!!

Janet




Ah, but Janet, we southerners are not acclimated to cold temps.  We suffer when it is even at freezing.  Our homes are not as well insulated and we don't have strong heat sources.  Besides, we have had to even buy winter coats in recent years it has been so cold.

Kermie's little froggie legs are very delicate and he needs those leg warmers badly.



Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #797 1/30/09 -
Post by: hotping on January 31, 2009, 10:56:20 PM
How's your day Kermit?  Don't think anyone wants to talk face to face with you today.

Hotshot probably ran off to get her poop suit.

She needs more than a poop suit after some of the things She's done She needs a straight jacket...JMO

And probably some of this....for the cooties.

(http://ace.imageg.net/graphics/product_images/pACE2-1122323reg.jpg)
Can You Aruba size it?   ::MonkeyHaHa:: Even though I believe that She is beyond help... ::MonkeyEek::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #797 1/30/09 -
Post by: Kermit on January 31, 2009, 10:56:56 PM
How's your day Kermit?  Don't think anyone wants to talk face to face with you today.

Hotshot probably ran off to get her poop suit.

She needs more than a poop suit after some of the things She's done She needs a straight jacket...JMO

And probably some of this....for the cooties.

(http://ace.imageg.net/graphics/product_images/pACE2-1122323reg.jpg)


I think she NEEDS a little LOT of that to kill the bug up her buttinsky.



Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #797 1/30/09 -
Post by: wreck on January 31, 2009, 10:56:58 PM
Be back later (late) to mop up! Stand tall monkeys!  ::MonkeyCool::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #797 1/30/09 -
Post by: Keepthefaith on January 31, 2009, 10:57:31 PM
OK.I'm back.Had to go to the Daughter's basketball game!She made her first shot.On page 31 so i will catch up and see you all in a minute! ::MonkeyDance::

 ::cartwheel::

Yeah it was great Janet.She got the ball,she stood there,the parents screamed to shoot from the sidelines,she shot,made it.then ran down the floor and told us to be quiet! ::MonkeyHaHa::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #797 1/30/09 -
Post by: Kermit on January 31, 2009, 10:58:11 PM
Kermit, want me to knit you some goat socks for your
froggie legs?

Magnolia ... you have not yet finished knitting my sweater.  Kermit arrives on the scene and ... "Kermit, want me to knit you some goat socks for your froggie legs?"

Kermit lives in the southern US.  I live north of the Canadian border.  Just think about it.

 ::MonkeyNoNo::

Hi Kermit!!!

Janet




Ah, but Janet, we southerners are not acclimated to cold temps.  We suffer when it is even at freezing.  Our homes are not as well insulated and we don't have strong heat sources.  Besides, we have had to even buy winter coats in recent years it has been so cold.

Kermie's little froggie legs are very delicate and he needs those leg warmers badly.



lol, yes my legs are all weak and wobbly.



Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #797 1/30/09 -
Post by: hotping on January 31, 2009, 10:59:14 PM
How's your day Kermit?  Don't think anyone wants to talk face to face with you today.

Hotshot probably ran off to get her poop suit.

She needs more than a poop suit after some of the things She's done She needs a straight jacket...JMO

And probably some of this....for the cooties.

(http://ace.imageg.net/graphics/product_images/pACE2-1122323reg.jpg)


I think she NEEDS a little LOT of that to kill the bug up her buttinsky.


  ::MonkeyShocked:: ::MonkeyLaugh::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #797 1/30/09 -
Post by: Kermit on January 31, 2009, 11:00:14 PM
How's your day Kermit?  Don't think anyone wants to talk face to face with you today.

Hotshot probably ran off to get her poop suit.


I have a feeling as long as you are here she want be.


Maybe she had the poops.



The minute you popped in she was like "OH CHIT".

Guilt does that to a person.
 



Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #797 1/30/09 -
Post by: hotping on January 31, 2009, 11:00:18 PM
Be back later (late) to mop up! Stand tall monkeys!  ::MonkeyCool::
Thanks Wreck!  ::MonkeyCool::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #797 1/30/09 -
Post by: Anna on January 31, 2009, 11:00:28 PM
When someone comes here and posts specific bold faced lies about me and makes accusations, I feel I have every right to ask for the source of these lies.

And why not disucss it right here where the lies were told in the first place and with the person who told them?

But as usual, no response.  That's because there is none.  The behavior of some of these disgruntled people is way over the top.  They try to take things to a new level constantly.

It's better to confront them right on the spot.  If you try to be polite it goes right over their head and is a wasted effort. 

So I do hope anyone who read the original lies sees the response I get when I ask for clarification and can figure this out for themselves.

I stand by Anna.




Ah, that's the nicest thing anybody has said to me all day, Kerm! :smt054


I would kiss you but then you would turn into a Prince and we wouldn't have our frog any more.




Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #797 1/30/09 -
Post by: texasmom on January 31, 2009, 11:00:51 PM
OK.I'm back.Had to go to the Daughter's basketball game!She made her first shot.On page 31 so i will catch up and see you all in a minute! ::MonkeyDance::

 ::cartwheel::

Yeah it was great Janet.She got the ball,she stood there,the parents screamed to shoot from the sidelines,she shot,made it.then ran down the floor and told us to be quiet! ::MonkeyHaHa::

That's GREAT KTF...reminds me of my boys; they always begged me to be quiet...never worked.   ::MonkeyWink::
 ::MonkeyDance:: ::MonkeyDance:: ::MonkeyDance::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #797 1/30/09 -
Post by: always 1 on January 31, 2009, 11:01:56 PM
OK.I'm back.Had to go to the Daughter's basketball game!She made her first shot.On page 31 so i will catch up and see you all in a minute! ::MonkeyDance::

 ::cartwheel::

Yeah it was great Janet.She got the ball,she stood there,the parents screamed to shoot from the sidelines,she shot,made it.then ran down the floor and told us to be quiet! ::MonkeyHaHa::
Good job, I bet youre a great Dad.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #797 1/30/09 -
Post by: Keepthefaith on January 31, 2009, 11:02:15 PM
These are the perpetrators in this case:

(http://i272.photobucket.com/albums/jj176/bastibro/Kalpoe/FFFFFFFFFFFF.jpg)

Caps, OE and even Kermit were/are just trying to get to the truth.
The problem is that some people having difficulties to stay humble and that they enjoy the fact that some people make them to important, unfortunately(and i exclude Kyle here) ::MonkeyWink::



1.Kermit-posted nothing but the truth backed up by the Freebirds,as well as Kyle!
2.Kyle-Potentially an accessory to obstruction of justice.Backed up by his own words,as well as actions.
3.CapsLockWizard-Has posted many false statements regarding this case!

And you call Kermit the fraud! ::MonkeyLaugh::

BASTIBRO'S LOGIC! ::MonkeyCool::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #797 1/30/09 -
Post by: always 1 on January 31, 2009, 11:03:12 PM
Welcome Mia.


 ::MonkeyHaHa:: ::MonkeyHaHa:: ::MonkeyHaHa::


I think we are scaring the children!

Sorry, Always1.  Not very pleasant, I know, but it seems to be the only way to deal with some shameless people.  They just won't be reasonable and won't respond to normal dialog.

She needs to act her age, not her shoe size.

 ::MonkeyLaugh::
Me?????????


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #797 1/30/09 -
Post by: Blue Moon on January 31, 2009, 11:03:16 PM
http://www.sacramentopress.com/headline/2601/HPI_in_Aruba_In_Search_of_Natalee_Holloway_Part_1

[

snip:

Sasha laughed. Sasha: You are a ghosthunter, this is funny. There are many ghosts here in Aruba and many stories. The blonde phantom woman, is probably the Lady of the Mist. The Lady of the Mist is a ghost of a woman, that may have drowned. If you want to know how Natalee died, I know some of Joran's (Joran van der Sloot) circle of friends. I was told that Joran placed some drugs in her drinks and when he got her out to the beach, she went into convulsions. He had one of his friends drop her out in the ocean. Joran was scared when Natalee went into convulsions, because it was his drugs that killed her. Joran could only think of getting rid of any evidence and that was disposing of the body. That is why Joran did not call the cops, he is a coward.

Paul: Sasha, why haven't you told the cops? Sasha: The cops already know and they do nothing. I don't want to be involved and please do not use my name in your article, not my real name, you can call me Sasha, that is okay. Paul: Wow! I was expecting to just try and get some EVPs, I didn't realize I was going to talk to a person that has some inside knowledge.

After my meeting with Sasha, I watched her as she walked into a crowd of people at the local mall and vanished. I can only wonder what other information, I will find while in Aruba?

As I walked back to my hotel, I sort of was in a trance after talking with Sasha. A Mercedes pulls up and a dark haired Arubian girl stops the Mercedes and opens the door and tells me to get in! As I prepared to get in, a horn blows and I realize I was merely daydreaming. The person blowing the horn, was a large old woman in an old beat up Chevy. I was daydreaming the James Bond (Quantum of Solice) scene.

Hey, what do you expect? I am in paradise, the island of dreams...I can daydream a little bit. But, I know that this vacation is becoming an adventure and the night has not even arrived yet.

Okay, the night is here. It's Wednesday night. It's time to get friendly. It's time to interview people. My first interviewee is: Vasilisa Henriquez. Vasilisa verifies the story that Sasha told me and doesn't mind that I use her real name in my article. Vasilisa looks like a model and she has this sweet Jamaican accent. Instead of calling me Paul, she calls me Pol. I like that. Vasilisa Henriquez also tells me that Joran called his father when Natalee supposingly died. It was Joran's father that took Natalee on the boat and dumped her body. This is the story that has been told repeatedly here in Aruba


Great article.  Pretty darn convincing! 

A simple crime is what I always called this.  BUT just going into convulsions doesn't warrant dumping her in the ocean.  Why not call an ambulance and leave her where she is at?  Because there is just a little more to the story that they are not telling.  She was gang raped by the pimps, probably filmed in the process and the Elders on that hell island covered it all up.  Just my opinion only.  But it is so frustrating that everyone on that island knows about this and what happened but cannot and will not do anything about it.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #797 1/30/09 -
Post by: Kermit on January 31, 2009, 11:03:34 PM


Ah, that's the nicest thing anybody has said to me all day, Kerm! :smt054


I would kiss you but then you would turn into a Prince and we wouldn't have our frog any more.

Perhaps a kiss would get rid of the warts that keep on jumping in here.



Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #797 1/30/09 -
Post by: Keepthefaith on January 31, 2009, 11:04:12 PM
OK.I'm back.Had to go to the Daughter's basketball game!She made her first shot.On page 31 so i will catch up and see you all in a minute! ::MonkeyDance::

 ::cartwheel::

Yeah it was great Janet.She got the ball,she stood there,the parents screamed to shoot from the sidelines,she shot,made it.then ran down the floor and told us to be quiet! ::MonkeyHaHa::

That's GREAT KTF...reminds me of my boys; they always begged me to be quiet...never worked.   ::MonkeyWink::
 ::MonkeyDance:: ::MonkeyDance:: ::MonkeyDance::

Was Funny!Thanx TM back to JUSTICE FOR NATALEE...


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #797 1/30/09 -
Post by: Kermit on January 31, 2009, 11:04:29 PM
These are the perpetrators in this case:

(http://i272.photobucket.com/albums/jj176/bastibro/Kalpoe/FFFFFFFFFFFF.jpg)

Caps, OE and even Kermit were/are just trying to get to the truth.
The problem is that some people having difficulties to stay humble and that they enjoy the fact that some people make them to important, unfortunately(and i exclude Kyle here) ::MonkeyWink::



1.Kermit-posted nothing but the truth backed up by the Freebirds,as well as Kyle!
2.Kyle-Potentially an accessory to obstruction of justice.Backed up by his own words,as well as actions.
3.CapsLockWizard-Has posted many false statements regarding this case!

And you call Kermit the fraud! ::MonkeyLaugh::

BASTIBRO'S LOGIC! ::MonkeyCool::

Natalee Case Discussion #794 1/18/09 -
« Reply #292 on: January 19, 2009, 09:56:41 PM »
4.Kermit isn't a GOD.Kermit is a Muppet and a FABULOUS one at that!
http://scaredmonkeys.net/index.php?topic=4388.280




Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #797 1/30/09 -
Post by: Keepthefaith on January 31, 2009, 11:04:59 PM
OK.I'm back.Had to go to the Daughter's basketball game!She made her first shot.On page 31 so i will catch up and see you all in a minute! ::MonkeyDance::

 ::cartwheel::

Yeah it was great Janet.She got the ball,she stood there,the parents screamed to shoot from the sidelines,she shot,made it.then ran down the floor and told us to be quiet! ::MonkeyHaHa::
Good job, I bet youre a great Dad.

Thanx A1.We can only do our best!


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #797 1/30/09 -
Post by: hotping on January 31, 2009, 11:05:57 PM


Ah, that's the nicest thing anybody has said to me all day, Kerm! :smt054


I would kiss you but then you would turn into a Prince and we wouldn't have our frog any more.

Perhaps a kiss would get rid of the warts that keep on jumping in here.


  ::MonkeyHaHa::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #797 1/30/09 -
Post by: Anna on January 31, 2009, 11:06:43 PM
Welcome Mia.


 ::MonkeyHaHa:: ::MonkeyHaHa:: ::MonkeyHaHa::


I think we are scaring the children!

Sorry, Always1.  Not very pleasant, I know, but it seems to be the only way to deal with some shameless people.  They just won't be reasonable and won't respond to normal dialog.

She needs to act her age, not her shoe size.

 ::MonkeyLaugh::
Me?????????

No, not you to act your age but the one who has photos taken making inappropriate contact with young males young enough to be her children.

I was apologizing to you if we are upsetting you with all the back and forth with our vermin problem we have in this thread.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #797 1/30/09 -
Post by: Keepthefaith on January 31, 2009, 11:07:24 PM
These are the perpetrators in this case:

(http://i272.photobucket.com/albums/jj176/bastibro/Kalpoe/FFFFFFFFFFFF.jpg)

Caps, OE and even Kermit were/are just trying to get to the truth.
The problem is that some people having difficulties to stay humble and that they enjoy the fact that some people make them to important, unfortunately(and i exclude Kyle here) ::MonkeyWink::



1.Kermit-posted nothing but the truth backed up by the Freebirds,as well as Kyle!
2.Kyle-Potentially an accessory to obstruction of justice.Backed up by his own words,as well as actions.
3.CapsLockWizard-Has posted many false statements regarding this case!

And you call Kermit the fraud! ::MonkeyLaugh::

BASTIBRO'S LOGIC! ::MonkeyCool::

Natalee Case Discussion #794 1/18/09 -
« Reply #292 on: January 19, 2009, 09:56:41 PM »
4.Kermit isn't a GOD.Kermit is a Muppet and a FABULOUS one at that!
http://scaredmonkeys.net/index.php?topic=4388.280




At the height of your career on the Muppet Show many did think of you as a God! ::MonkeyTongue::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #797 1/30/09 -
Post by: always 1 on January 31, 2009, 11:08:39 PM
Welcome Mia.


 ::MonkeyHaHa:: ::MonkeyHaHa:: ::MonkeyHaHa::


I think we are scaring the children!

Sorry, Always1.  Not very pleasant, I know, but it seems to be the only way to deal with some shameless people.  They just won't be reasonable and won't respond to normal dialog.

She needs to act her age, not her shoe size.

 ::MonkeyLaugh::
Me?????????

No, not you to act your age but the one who has photos taken making inappropriate contact with young males young enough to be her children.

I was apologizing to you if we are upsetting you with all the back and forth with our vermin problem we have in this thread.
Oh,ok, thank you Anna.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #797 1/30/09 -
Post by: Anna on January 31, 2009, 11:11:23 PM
http://www.sacramentopress.com/headline/2601/HPI_in_Aruba_In_Search_of_Natalee_Holloway_Part_1

[

snip:

Sasha laughed. Sasha: You are a ghosthunter, this is funny. There are many ghosts here in Aruba and many stories. The blonde phantom woman, is probably the Lady of the Mist. The Lady of the Mist is a ghost of a woman, that may have drowned. If you want to know how Natalee died, I know some of Joran's (Joran van der Sloot) circle of friends. I was told that Joran placed some drugs in her drinks and when he got her out to the beach, she went into convulsions. He had one of his friends drop her out in the ocean. Joran was scared when Natalee went into convulsions, because it was his drugs that killed her. Joran could only think of getting rid of any evidence and that was disposing of the body. That is why Joran did not call the cops, he is a coward.

Paul: Sasha, why haven't you told the cops? Sasha: The cops already know and they do nothing. I don't want to be involved and please do not use my name in your article, not my real name, you can call me Sasha, that is okay. Paul: Wow! I was expecting to just try and get some EVPs, I didn't realize I was going to talk to a person that has some inside knowledge.

After my meeting with Sasha, I watched her as she walked into a crowd of people at the local mall and vanished. I can only wonder what other information, I will find while in Aruba?

As I walked back to my hotel, I sort of was in a trance after talking with Sasha. A Mercedes pulls up and a dark haired Arubian girl stops the Mercedes and opens the door and tells me to get in! As I prepared to get in, a horn blows and I realize I was merely daydreaming. The person blowing the horn, was a large old woman in an old beat up Chevy. I was daydreaming the James Bond (Quantum of Solice) scene.

Hey, what do you expect? I am in paradise, the island of dreams...I can daydream a little bit. But, I know that this vacation is becoming an adventure and the night has not even arrived yet.

Okay, the night is here. It's Wednesday night. It's time to get friendly. It's time to interview people. My first interviewee is: Vasilisa Henriquez. Vasilisa verifies the story that Sasha told me and doesn't mind that I use her real name in my article. Vasilisa looks like a model and she has this sweet Jamaican accent. Instead of calling me Paul, she calls me Pol. I like that. Vasilisa Henriquez also tells me that Joran called his father when Natalee supposingly died. It was Joran's father that took Natalee on the boat and dumped her body. This is the story that has been told repeatedly here in Aruba


Great article.  Pretty darn convincing! 

A simple crime is what I always called this.  BUT just going into convulsions doesn't warrant dumping her in the ocean.  Why not call an ambulance and leave her where she is at?  Because there is just a little more to the story that they are not telling.  She was gang raped by the pimps, probably filmed in the process and the Elders on that hell island covered it all up.  Just my opinion only.  But it is so frustrating that everyone on that island knows about this and what happened but cannot and will not do anything about it.


Does anyone recognize the name of the author of that article?  It seems vaguely familiar.


Blue Moon, Yes, after Joran drugged Natalee and gave her an overdose becuase he is incredibly stupid, I believe that what you said is what happened pretty much as well.

The fact that this Sasha says the police already know but won't do anything about it is just so discouraging. 



Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #797 1/30/09 -
Post by: iris44 on January 31, 2009, 11:12:15 PM
http://www.sacramentopress.com/headline/2601/HPI_in_Aruba_In_Search_of_Natalee_Holloway_Part_1

[

snip:

Sasha laughed. Sasha: You are a ghosthunter, this is funny. There are many ghosts here in Aruba and many stories. The blonde phantom woman, is probably the Lady of the Mist. The Lady of the Mist is a ghost of a woman, that may have drowned. If you want to know how Natalee died, I know some of Joran's (Joran van der Sloot) circle of friends. I was told that Joran placed some drugs in her drinks and when he got her out to the beach, she went into convulsions. He had one of his friends drop her out in the ocean. Joran was scared when Natalee went into convulsions, because it was his drugs that killed her. Joran could only think of getting rid of any evidence and that was disposing of the body. That is why Joran did not call the cops, he is a coward.

Paul: Sasha, why haven't you told the cops? Sasha: The cops already know and they do nothing. I don't want to be involved and please do not use my name in your article, not my real name, you can call me Sasha, that is okay. Paul: Wow! I was expecting to just try and get some EVPs, I didn't realize I was going to talk to a person that has some inside knowledge.

After my meeting with Sasha, I watched her as she walked into a crowd of people at the local mall and vanished. I can only wonder what other information, I will find while in Aruba?

As I walked back to my hotel, I sort of was in a trance after talking with Sasha. A Mercedes pulls up and a dark haired Arubian girl stops the Mercedes and opens the door and tells me to get in! As I prepared to get in, a horn blows and I realize I was merely daydreaming. The person blowing the horn, was a large old woman in an old beat up Chevy. I was daydreaming the James Bond (Quantum of Solice) scene.

Hey, what do you expect? I am in paradise, the island of dreams...I can daydream a little bit. But, I know that this vacation is becoming an adventure and the night has not even arrived yet.

Okay, the night is here. It's Wednesday night. It's time to get friendly. It's time to interview people. My first interviewee is: Vasilisa Henriquez. Vasilisa verifies the story that Sasha told me and doesn't mind that I use her real name in my article. Vasilisa looks like a model and she has this sweet Jamaican accent. Instead of calling me Paul, she calls me Pol. I like that. Vasilisa Henriquez also tells me that Joran called his father when Natalee supposingly died. It was Joran's father that took Natalee on the boat and dumped her body. This is the story that has been told repeatedly here in Aruba


Great article.  Pretty darn convincing! 

A simple crime is what I always called this.  BUT just going into convulsions doesn't warrant dumping her in the ocean.  Why not call an ambulance and leave her where she is at?  Because there is just a little more to the story that they are not telling.  She was gang raped by the pimps, probably filmed in the process and the Elders on that hell island covered it all up.  Just my opinion only.  But it is so frustrating that everyone on that island knows about this and what happened but cannot and will not do anything about it.

I agree.  They all sure act guilty. The creepiest part is that someone probably still has a video. They seem too arrogant to destroy it.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #797 1/30/09 -
Post by: Kermit on January 31, 2009, 11:12:26 PM


At the height of your career on the Muppet Show many did think of you as a God! ::MonkeyTongue::
[/quote]

 ::MonkeyLaugh:: ::MonkeyLaugh:: ::MonkeyLaugh::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #797 1/30/09 -
Post by: Blue Moon on January 31, 2009, 11:16:00 PM
Iris, I believe that it was filmed and that tape made it to Florida where  Mr. Paulus made a mad dash to the U.S./Florida and either retrieved it or made sure it was destroyed and no copies existed.  JMO


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #797 1/30/09 -
Post by: billb's daughter on January 31, 2009, 11:16:38 PM


At the height of your career on the Muppet Show many did think of you as a God! ::MonkeyTongue::

 ::MonkeyLaugh:: ::MonkeyLaugh:: ::MonkeyLaugh::
[/quote]
KTF...
Not cool!
Now they know Kermit was a Muppet....
Too much personal data..  ::MonkeyCool:: ::MonkeyLaugh:: ::MonkeyDance::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #797 1/30/09 -
Post by: Keepthefaith on January 31, 2009, 11:18:15 PM


At the height of your career on the Muppet Show many did think of you as a God! ::MonkeyTongue::

 ::MonkeyLaugh:: ::MonkeyLaugh:: ::MonkeyLaugh::
KTF...
Not cool!
Now they know Kermit was a Muppet....
Too much personal data..  ::MonkeyCool:: ::MonkeyLaugh:: ::MonkeyDance::

[/quote]

 ::MonkeyEek:: Klaas.I won't get banned for that will i?Promise it'll never happen again!

 ::MonkeyLaugh:: ::MonkeyDance:: ::MonkeyLaugh:: ::MonkeyDance::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #797 1/30/09 -
Post by: billb's daughter on January 31, 2009, 11:23:27 PM
Iris, I believe that it was filmed and that tape made it to Florida where  Mr. Paulus made a mad dash to the U.S./Florida and either retrieved it or made sure it was destroyed and no copies existed.  JMO
I have believed that as soon as we heard rumors paulass went to fl...the pimps uploaded the tape to someone in fl....paulass made sure it would be covered up. I never believed the cover story that paulass went to fl because urine decided not to go to college there...what bs....


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #797 1/30/09 -
Post by: klaasend on January 31, 2009, 11:23:44 PM

 ::MonkeyEek:: Klaas.I won't get banned for that will i?Promise it'll never happen again!

 ::MonkeyLaugh:: ::MonkeyDance:: ::MonkeyLaugh:: ::MonkeyDance::

 ::MonkeyHaHa::  No, you are fine  ::MonkeyHaHa::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #797 1/30/09 -
Post by: Tamikosmom on January 31, 2009, 11:24:01 PM

A simple crime is what I always called this.  BUT just going into convulsions doesn't warrant dumping her in the ocean.  Why not call an ambulance and leave her where she is at?  Because there is just a little more to the story that they are not telling.  She was gang raped by the pimps, probably filmed in the process and the Elders on that hell island covered it all up.  Just my opinion only.  But it is so frustrating that everyone on that island knows about this and what happened but cannot and will not do anything about it.



'The Abrams Report' for August 26
updated 11:37 a.m. PT, Mon., Aug. 29, 2005

Statement from the Prosecutor's Office


In the early morning hours of Friday, the 26th of August, 2005, police once more arrested the brothers, Satish Kalpoe and Deepak Kalpoe. They are in custody based on the same suspicions as before. They are suspected of the primary criminal act of together with other people committing premeditated murder, alternately together with other people murdering somebody, more alternately rob a person of her liberty with fatal consequences and even more alternately, raping somebody.

Aside from these suspicions against the two brothers, there are new suspicions, which at this point the prosecutor is not commenting on. To arrest S.K. and D.K. again, there had to be new facts and circumstances. That is the case.

http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/9118769/


NANCY GRACE
Kalpoe Brothers Rearrested
Aired August 26, 2005 - 20:00:00   ET


HELEN LEJUEZ, TWITTY FAMILY ATTORNEY: I don`t think this has to do with a lot of wiretapping. I do believe it has to do with bringing forth the new evidence. It has to do with the case approaching the 60 days and that they are adding new evidence so they can have the case going.

GRACE: OK, what new evidence, Helen?

LEJUEZ: The rape case.

GRACE: OK. You said new evidence. What "new evidence" regarding Natalee Holloway do you think prosecutors have?

LEJUEZ: Right now, they`re talking about a gang rape. So when we talk about a gang rape, we talk about a gang. The gang consisted of three of them. Right?
GRACE: Right.

LEJUEZ: Even though -- even though maybe it`s not out that the other suspect that`s in jail right now will be added to the gang, he is part of the gang.

http://transcripts.cnn.com/TRANSCRIPTS/0508/26/ng.01.html


Aruba Suspects Accused of Taking Sex Photos of Another Girl
Thursday, September 01, 2005


The Kalpoe brothers were released July 4 and rearrested last week with a friend of the three young men, Freddy Alexander Zedan-Arambatzis (search), 21.
 
Zedan-Arambatzis, who is not suspected of involvement in the Holloway case, is accused of taking photos of a minor female in "tempting poses" and of showing the photos to other people, said his lawyer, Diana Emerencia. He is also suspected of having unspecified "physical contact" with the girl, she said.

The Kalpoe brothers and van der Sloot are also suspected of involvement in the incident, which allegedly occurred before Holloway disappeared, Emerencia said.

http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,168233,00.html



Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #797 1/30/09 -
Post by: iris44 on January 31, 2009, 11:24:58 PM
Iris, I believe that it was filmed and that tape made it to Florida where  Mr. Paulus made a mad dash to the U.S./Florida and either retrieved it or made sure it was destroyed and no copies existed.  JMO

Hope so, although it would be implicate them, it would be heartbreaking for the family if it turned up.  I remember the talk about the trip to Florida.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #797 1/30/09 -
Post by: Anna on January 31, 2009, 11:27:02 PM
Iris, I believe that it was filmed and that tape made it to Florida where  Mr. Paulus made a mad dash to the U.S./Florida and either retrieved it or made sure it was destroyed and no copies existed.  JMO
I have believed that as soon as we heard rumors paulass went to fl...the pimps uploaded the tape to someone in fl....paulass made sure it would be covered up. I never believed the cover story that paulass went to fl because urine decided not to go to college there...what bs....

Anyone remember the Grindle Codes?  Guess that was yet another riddler jerking us around.  Someone posted something like half a computer code and we knocked ourselves out trying to track it down.  Was the first virus I ever got on my computer bad enough to crash it.

Maybe that is why I don't like riddles any more.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #797 1/30/09 -
Post by: Keepthefaith on January 31, 2009, 11:29:28 PM

 ::MonkeyEek:: Klaas.I won't get banned for that will i?Promise it'll never happen again!

 ::MonkeyLaugh:: ::MonkeyDance:: ::MonkeyLaugh:: ::MonkeyDance::

 ::MonkeyHaHa::  No, you are fine  ::MonkeyHaHa::


Thanx! ::MonkeyDance::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #797 1/30/09 -
Post by: Keepthefaith on January 31, 2009, 11:31:16 PM
BILLB.Just checkin in with ya!Judging from your posting so far it seems you got to your stackaholic meeting today! ::MonkeyTongue::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #797 1/30/09 -
Post by: billb's daughter on January 31, 2009, 11:31:22 PM
I know we are all hoping for some sign that the investigation into the disappearance (murder) of Natalee is still making progress...do we have a list of the possible ways that may be happening?
1. civil case brought on behave of Beth in Netherlands court.
2. FBI looking into persistence involvement wrt to video/photes kyle discussed/Kermit exposed with Freebirds confirmation
3. hero moving forward with his promise of an investigation of jan vs.
4. rudy's call for an investigation because of the phone conversations btwn paulass/jan vs
5??
what do we think will bring Justice for Natalee??


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #797 1/30/09 -
Post by: Anna on January 31, 2009, 11:33:01 PM
I know we are all hoping for some sign that the investigation into the disappearance (murder) of Natalee is still making progress...do we have a list of the possible ways that may be happening?
1. civil case brought on behave of Beth in Netherlands court.
2. FBI looking into persistence involvement wrt to video/photes kyle discussed/Kermit exposed with Freebirds confirmation
3. hero moving forward with his promise of an investigation of jan vs.
4. rudy's call for an investigation because of the phone conversations btwn paulass/jan vs
5??
what do we think will bring Justice for Natalee??



5.  The tapes TJ Ward gave to Greta that connect Paulus to "some Colombians" who might be implicated at least in the disposal of the remains?


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #797 1/30/09 -
Post by: Keepthefaith on January 31, 2009, 11:33:48 PM
I know we are all hoping for some sign that the investigation into the disappearance (murder) of Natalee is still making progress...do we have a list of the possible ways that may be happening?
1. civil case brought on behave of Beth in Netherlands court.
2. FBI looking into persistence involvement wrt to video/photes kyle discussed/Kermit exposed with Freebirds confirmation
3. hero moving forward with his promise of an investigation of jan vs.
4. rudy's call for an investigation because of the phone conversations btwn paulass/jan vs
5??
what do we think will bring Justice for Natalee??


I also think many of us are waiting to hear what the Tj Ward tapes hold.Paulus and connections to Colombians??


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #797 1/30/09 -
Post by: Blue Moon on January 31, 2009, 11:34:26 PM
Iris, I believe that it was filmed and that tape made it to Florida where  Mr. Paulus made a mad dash to the U.S./Florida and either retrieved it or made sure it was destroyed and no copies existed.  JMO
I have believed that as soon as we heard rumors paulass went to fl...the pimps uploaded the tape to someone in fl....paulass made sure it would be covered up. I never believed the cover story that paulass went to fl because urine decided not to go to college there...what bs....

Paulus did not have to go to Florida to get tuition money back.  Hell they themselves said the A-hole Joran was so smart he had a full paid scholarship so he lied, lied, lied about that trip.  JMO


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #797 1/30/09 -
Post by: Anna on January 31, 2009, 11:34:51 PM
LOL, our posts match even to the second!


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #797 1/30/09 -
Post by: Keepthefaith on January 31, 2009, 11:34:57 PM
You beat me to it Anna.Sorry you didn't get your Answer from HotShot.Maybe the answer will come in time. ::MonkeyWink::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #797 1/30/09 -
Post by: Blue Moon on January 31, 2009, 11:36:00 PM
Iris, I believe that it was filmed and that tape made it to Florida where  Mr. Paulus made a mad dash to the U.S./Florida and either retrieved it or made sure it was destroyed and no copies existed.  JMO
I have believed that as soon as we heard rumors paulass went to fl...the pimps uploaded the tape to someone in fl....paulass made sure it would be covered up. I never believed the cover story that paulass went to fl because urine decided not to go to college there...what bs....


Anyone remember the Grindle Codes?  Guess that was yet another riddler jerking us around.  Someone posted something like half a computer code and we knocked ourselves out trying to track it down.  Was the first virus I ever got on my computer bad enough to crash it.

Maybe that is why I don't like riddles any more.

I don't remember the Grindle Codes but I do remember a few did have their computers crashed.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #797 1/30/09 -
Post by: Anna on January 31, 2009, 11:36:57 PM
You beat me to it Anna.Sorry you didn't get your Answer from HotShot.Maybe the answer will come in time. ::MonkeyWink::

Actually we are tied even to the second. 

I think I got my answer and it was just as I thought.



Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #797 1/30/09 -
Post by: billb's daughter on January 31, 2009, 11:39:26 PM
BILLB.Just checkin in with ya!Judging from your posting so far it seems you got to your stackaholic meeting today! ::MonkeyTongue::
Stackaholic...did you say stackaholic?

Notice I only said stackaholic once before saying...did you say stackaholic?...
See, I'm getting better...I usually say...stackaholic....stackaholic....stackaholic (3 times) before I say...did you say stackaholic?
I though the meeting went well...but after re-reading what I just wrote.....I need to call a member stackaholic to discuss..I may be regressing... ::MonkeyCool::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #797 1/30/09 -
Post by: Blue Moon on January 31, 2009, 11:40:37 PM
I know we are all hoping for some sign that the investigation into the disappearance (murder) of Natalee is still making progress...do we have a list of the possible ways that may be happening?
1. civil case brought on behave of Beth in Netherlands court.
2. FBI looking into persistence involvement wrt to video/photes kyle discussed/Kermit exposed with Freebirds confirmation
3. hero moving forward with his promise of an investigation of jan vs.
4. rudy's call for an investigation because of the phone conversations btwn paulass/jan vs
5??
what do we think will bring Justice for Natalee??


I have to go with #1.  I think the FBI and our country is limited in what they can do in a foreign country.  So I am hoping Beth and her lawyer in the NL will be able to accomplish something out of this but no until Joran is no longer on the run.  He has to be in the NL before they can do anything with him and his daddy made sure to ship him to Thailand or wherever he is now.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #797 1/30/09 -
Post by: Lady Devon on January 31, 2009, 11:41:46 PM
Do you all remember when SM came to life?  We were all nice, everyone had their own ideas, and shared.  It was OK back then.  Now look below as to some of the nasty things people have to say HERE years later.  My answers in purple.

blue moon   Brinkman probably at this moment belongs the the CnG site. Appears everyone does, why not him?......Why are you so jealous?  Because they didn't ask you to join?  
Lady Devon   Since I seldom post and won't suffer if I am banned or reprimanded , I will say to Idstlou, "Enough!" Be silent long enough to read what others have shared with you, take the time to READ EVERY WORD......We have read every word a million times plus with the way some repeatedly post here.  It's not going to change a thing.   I have said many times "not that it means a thing"  Kyle was not in charge of the boat.  Nothing was his call, at all.  Just reading the screen.  CAPS is alot of what you'll all never see, because you chose to put his life at risk, by posting everything here on him. 
 A perfect example of what I was referring to....My post was to Idstlou and in reference to the level of emotion in her posts (that I have read) that prevents any form of discussion. Please do not take my post out of context. I don't recall ever addressing a post to you (except this one!)


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #797 1/30/09 -
Post by: Keepthefaith on January 31, 2009, 11:42:19 PM
You beat me to it Anna.Sorry you didn't get your Answer from HotShot.Maybe the answer will come in time. ::MonkeyWink::

Actually we are tied even to the second. 

I think I got my answer and it was just as I thought.



As long as we know those who are being mislead,choose to ignore the facts,or are flat out trying to divert our attention,i think we can continue to bounce ideas off one another.Nobody agree's on everything.The Monkey's know the ultimate goal is JUSTICE FOR NATALEE..


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #797 1/30/09 -
Post by: nonesuche on January 31, 2009, 11:44:34 PM
Interesting night, it's a shame hotshot won't stay and take the heat she and bastibro stirred up? Not surprising now is it?

I have a couple of things to say here and I don't say much often, so I hope some of you will indulge me. I'm not a true 'insider' as hotshot and ldstlou claim to be but I can tell you this much, the family is TIRED of watching what's happening on this thread. That I do know on good authority.

Also, this is for hotshot. I recall who began the first acting out against SM way back at the beginning of this and it was you and Ringo. Some of us foolishly let you plant half-truth's in our heads and/or make us doubt the intent of some who never deserved that. You have one outrageous audacity to state it's SM creating all of the issues now.

Some of us remember the history and I would think after four years of you inserting yourself as the super sleuth above all others to the degree that Dave won't even give you his phone number, that you could buy a clue !

I will repeat, the family is not happy to see all of these drive-by attacks and if you respect them, you will respect their feelings and the intent of this forum to support Natalee above all else.



Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #797 1/30/09 -
Post by: 2NJSons_Mom on January 31, 2009, 11:45:34 PM
You beat me to it Anna.Sorry you didn't get your Answer from HotShot.Maybe the answer will come in time. ::MonkeyWink::

Actually we are tied even to the second. 

I think I got my answer and it was just as I thought.



I was thinking the silence and exit was an answer....She bailed pretty quick. 



Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #797 1/30/09 -
Post by: Tamikosmom on January 31, 2009, 11:48:08 PM
I know we are all hoping for some sign that the investigation into the disappearance (murder) of Natalee is still making progress...do we have a list of the possible ways that may be happening?
1. civil case brought on behave of Beth in Netherlands court.
2. FBI looking into persistence involvement wrt to video/photes kyle discussed/Kermit exposed with Freebirds confirmation
3. hero moving forward with his promise of an investigation of jan vs.
4. rudy's call for an investigation because of the phone conversations btwn paulass/jan vs
5??
what do we think will bring Justice for Natalee??


I do not believe that justice for Natalee Holloway is going to come from a Dutch/Aruban courtroom.  The domino effect of accountability is too far reaching.  There are those involed in the happening that encompassed the morning of May 30, 2005.  There are those at all levels of the Aruban/Dutch administration who are participants in the cover.  There is the judiciary in regards to their favorable rulings on behalf of the suspects.  Then there are those who are participants in Aruba's underground economy which encompasses drugs, alcohol, sex trade, gambling, money laundering ...

However ... Kyle Kingman and Tim Trahan have the ability to expose to the FBI ... from first hand observation ...  John Silvetti's participation in the finale to the great Aruban coverup. Kyle Kingman and Tim Trahan have the ability to expose to the FBI ... from first hand observation ... the contents of that trap/cage.

When the case is closed ... the FBI can take over and ... maybe ... just maybe ... a measure of closure can be afforded to the family of Natalee Holloway ... a measure of closure knowing that their beloved could possibly have been in that trap/cage.

Hopefully ... something is currently going on behind the scenes.  Think about it.  The Natalee's Freebirds forwarded a compiled account of Kyle Kingsmans posts to the FBI, John Kelly and Beth Holloway.

Janet

+++++++


Growing Frustration in Aruba
Wednesday, July 06, 2005


GEORGE "JUG" TWITTY: Well, the way the system works down here, when the case is closed, we will have all that information, and we can release it to the world.

http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,161705,00.html


Art Wood
DANA PRETZER
July 2, 2006 - Part 1
July 8, 2006 - Part 2


The family of Natalee needs to put pressure on the US attorney in Birmingham to push the FBI to conduct an investigation after ALE close the case. We have a treaty that allows the FBI to pursue a violation of civil rights of an American citizen there.


'Rita Cosby Live & Direct' for December 1
updated 7:37 a.m. PT, Fri., Dec. 2, 2005


ART WOOD, FORMER SECRET SERVICE AGENT: Absolutely. Absolutely. There's a lot that Americans can do through the State Department. I want to remind everybody that Natalee Holloway was a U.S. citizen. Once the Aruban authorities are done investigating this case, the FBI can still conduct an investigation, and they could extradite these suspects to the United States. Let me point out that there's a ton of circumstantial evidence in this case to convict these kids.

http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/10295536/


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #797 1/30/09 -
Post by: billb's daughter on January 31, 2009, 11:52:19 PM
I know we are all hoping for some sign that the investigation into the disappearance (murder) of Natalee is still making progress...do we have a list of the possible ways that may be happening?
1. civil case brought on behave of Beth in Netherlands court.
2. FBI looking into persistence involvement wrt to video/photes kyle discussed/Kermit exposed with Freebirds confirmation
3. hero moving forward with his promise of an investigation of jan vs.
4. rudy's call for an investigation because of the phone conversations btwn paulass/jan vs
5??
what do we think will bring Justice for Natalee??


I also think many of us are waiting to hear what the Tj Ward tapes hold.Paulus and connections to Colombians??
Anna:
5.  The tapes TJ Ward gave to Greta that connect Paulus to "some Colombians" who might be implicated at least in the disposal of the remains?

Anna..TM...I also want to know about the TJ tapes...but we still need some investigative agency and prosecutor to take action on the contents of the tapes if they become some type of prosecutable evidence...maybe through 1,3,or 4 above...although I have no faith that pos mos/aruba would act on any evidence...


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #797 1/30/09 -
Post by: Icehawk on January 31, 2009, 11:52:33 PM
JUSTICE FOR NATALEE


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #797 1/30/09 -
Post by: Blue Moon on January 31, 2009, 11:52:55 PM
Interesting night, it's a shame hotshot won't stay and take the heat she and bastibro stirred up? Not surprising now is it?

I have a couple of things to say here and I don't say much often, so I hope some of you will indulge me. I'm not a true 'insider' as hotshot and ldstlou claim to be but I can tell you this much, the family is TIRED of watching what's happening on this thread. That I do know on good authority.

Also, this is for hotshot. I recall who began the first acting out against SM way back at the beginning of this and it was you and Ringo. Some of us foolishly let you plant half-truth's in our heads and/or make us doubt the intent of some who never deserved that. You have one outrageous audacity to state it's SM creating all of the issues now.

Some of us remember the history and I would think after four years of you inserting yourself as the super sleuth above all others to the degree that Dave won't even give you his phone number, that you could buy a clue !

I will repeat, the family is not happy to see all of these drive-by attacks and if you respect them, you will respect their feelings and the intent of this forum to support Natalee above all else.



I hope that doesn't mean us on this board posting.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #797 1/30/09 -
Post by: San on January 31, 2009, 11:53:40 PM
Interesting night, it's a shame hotshot won't stay and take the heat she and bastibro stirred up? Not surprising now is it?

I have a couple of things to say here and I don't say much often, so I hope some of you will indulge me. I'm not a true 'insider' as hotshot and ldstlou claim to be but I can tell you this much, the family is TIRED of watching what's happening on this thread. That I do know on good authority.

Also, this is for hotshot. I recall who began the first acting out against SM way back at the beginning of this and it was you and Ringo. Some of us foolishly let you plant half-truth's in our heads and/or make us doubt the intent of some who never deserved that. You have one outrageous audacity to state it's SM creating all of the issues now.

Some of us remember the history and I would think after four years of you inserting yourself as the super sleuth above all others to the degree that Dave won't even give you his phone number, that you could buy a clue !

I will repeat, the family is not happy to see all of these drive-by attacks and if you respect them, you will respect their feelings and the intent of this forum to support Natalee above all else.


Thank you Nonesuche. 


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #797 1/30/09 -
Post by: San on January 31, 2009, 11:54:26 PM
Interesting night, it's a shame hotshot won't stay and take the heat she and bastibro stirred up? Not surprising now is it?

I have a couple of things to say here and I don't say much often, so I hope some of you will indulge me. I'm not a true 'insider' as hotshot and ldstlou claim to be but I can tell you this much, the family is TIRED of watching what's happening on this thread. That I do know on good authority.

Also, this is for hotshot. I recall who began the first acting out against SM way back at the beginning of this and it was you and Ringo. Some of us foolishly let you plant half-truth's in our heads and/or make us doubt the intent of some who never deserved that. You have one outrageous audacity to state it's SM creating all of the issues now.

Some of us remember the history and I would think after four years of you inserting yourself as the super sleuth above all others to the degree that Dave won't even give you his phone number, that you could buy a clue !

I will repeat, the family is not happy to see all of these drive-by attacks and if you respect them, you will respect their feelings and the intent of this forum to support Natalee above all else.



I hope that doesn't mean us on this board posting.

No it is not us.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #797 1/30/09 -
Post by: Keepthefaith on January 31, 2009, 11:54:28 PM
Interesting night, it's a shame hotshot won't stay and take the heat she and bastibro stirred up? Not surprising now is it?

I have a couple of things to say here and I don't say much often, so I hope some of you will indulge me. I'm not a true 'insider' as hotshot and ldstlou claim to be but I can tell you this much, the family is TIRED of watching what's happening on this thread. That I do know on good authority.

Also, this is for hotshot. I recall who began the first acting out against SM way back at the beginning of this and it was you and Ringo. Some of us foolishly let you plant half-truth's in our heads and/or make us doubt the intent of some who never deserved that. You have one outrageous audacity to state it's SM creating all of the issues now.

Some of us remember the history and I would think after four years of you inserting yourself as the super sleuth above all others to the degree that Dave won't even give you his phone number, that you could buy a clue !

I will repeat, the family is not happy to see all of these drive-by attacks and if you respect them, you will respect their feelings and the intent of this forum to support Natalee above all else.



I hope that doesn't mean us on this board posting.

From what i read your OK Blue Moon.Hope all is well down there in the cold.Prayers from Seattle!


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #797 1/30/09 -
Post by: Blue Moon on January 31, 2009, 11:55:19 PM
Interesting night, it's a shame hotshot won't stay and take the heat she and bastibro stirred up? Not surprising now is it?

I have a couple of things to say here and I don't say much often, so I hope some of you will indulge me. I'm not a true 'insider' as hotshot and ldstlou claim to be but I can tell you this much, the family is TIRED of watching what's happening on this thread. That I do know on good authority.

Also, this is for hotshot. I recall who began the first acting out against SM way back at the beginning of this and it was you and Ringo. Some of us foolishly let you plant half-truth's in our heads and/or make us doubt the intent of some who never deserved that. You have one outrageous audacity to state it's SM creating all of the issues now.

Some of us remember the history and I would think after four years of you inserting yourself as the super sleuth above all others to the degree that Dave won't even give you his phone number, that you could buy a clue !

I will repeat, the family is not happy to see all of these drive-by attacks and if you respect them, you will respect their feelings and the intent of this forum to support Natalee above all else.



I hope that doesn't mean us on this board posting.

No it is not us.

Thanks San.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #797 1/30/09 -
Post by: Keepthefaith on January 31, 2009, 11:55:52 PM
JUSTICE FOR NATALEE


IceHawk.Take it easy.I know your a little leary about hitting that 50 post mark but we're here for ya! ::MonkeyTongue::

Thanx for the continued Focus!


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #797 1/30/09 -
Post by: Edward on January 31, 2009, 11:56:04 PM
I have been reading and posting at scared monkeys well before Natalee went missing.. At Dans site also.
I have always hoped we as a group would grow and develop into a powerful research team..

Anyways.. I really doubt there was a Natalee in the giant crab trap... That is just my opinion.
I never believed anything in Shango..That is just my opinion.

I am not so sure it is what I would call "Better" Today.."Different" is a better word.
Many strange people have glued themselves to these forums since the beginning.Still today.

Natalee Holloway could be on land or at sea or in Nicaragua or just about any place..
If she was placed in the water, her body is gone a long time ago.

Everything we were shown in the crap trap is very interesting, but still adds up to nothing. Just my opinion.

I like research... That is just my opinion.



Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #797 1/30/09 -
Post by: Tamikosmom on January 31, 2009, 11:56:10 PM
Interesting night, it's a shame hotshot won't stay and take the heat she and bastibro stirred up? Not surprising now is it?

I have a couple of things to say here and I don't say much often, so I hope some of you will indulge me. I'm not a true 'insider' as hotshot and ldstlou claim to be but I can tell you this much, the family is TIRED of watching what's happening on this thread. That I do know on good authority.

Also, this is for hotshot. I recall who began the first acting out against SM way back at the beginning of this and it was you and Ringo. Some of us foolishly let you plant half-truth's in our heads and/or make us doubt the intent of some who never deserved that. You have one outrageous audacity to state it's SM creating all of the issues now.

Some of us remember the history and I would think after four years of you inserting yourself as the super sleuth above all others to the degree that Dave won't even give you his phone number, that you could buy a clue !

I will repeat, the family is not happy to see all of these drive-by attacks and if you respect them, you will respect their feelings and the intent of this forum to support Natalee above all else.



 ::MonkeyShocked::

Janet


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #797 1/30/09 -
Post by: Magnolia on January 31, 2009, 11:57:49 PM
I got knocked off and had to reboot.
Janet, I am working hard on your goat wool sweater.
Kermit's little leg warmers won't take but a minute.
San, I will be honored to make you a new hat.
I am a very fast knitter.
Remember that is all that I am good for.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #797 1/30/09 -
Post by: San on January 31, 2009, 11:58:16 PM
Interesting night, it's a shame hotshot won't stay and take the heat she and bastibro stirred up? Not surprising now is it?

I have a couple of things to say here and I don't say much often, so I hope some of you will indulge me. I'm not a true 'insider' as hotshot and ldstlou claim to be but I can tell you this much, the family is TIRED of watching what's happening on this thread. That I do know on good authority.

Also, this is for hotshot. I recall who began the first acting out against SM way back at the beginning of this and it was you and Ringo. Some of us foolishly let you plant half-truth's in our heads and/or make us doubt the intent of some who never deserved that. You have one outrageous audacity to state it's SM creating all of the issues now.

Some of us remember the history and I would think after four years of you inserting yourself as the super sleuth above all others to the degree that Dave won't even give you his phone number, that you could buy a clue !

I will repeat, the family is not happy to see all of these drive-by attacks and if you respect them, you will respect their feelings and the intent of this forum to support Natalee above all else.



 ::MonkeyShocked::

Janet

Not us Janet.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #797 1/30/09 -
Post by: Tamikosmom on February 01, 2009, 12:00:06 AM
GOOD NIGHT MONKEYS!!!  GOOD NIGHT ZOOKEEPERS!!!

Magnolia ... my sweater!!!  I know I am going to be a frozen little popsicle in the morning.  The temperatures are dipping below freezing.

 ::MonkeyWaa::

Janet
9:00 PM PT


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #797 1/30/09 -
Post by: billb's daughter on February 01, 2009, 12:00:41 AM
I know we are all hoping for some sign that the investigation into the disappearance (murder) of Natalee is still making progress...do we have a list of the possible ways that may be happening?
1. civil case brought on behave of Beth in Netherlands court.
2. FBI looking into persistence involvement wrt to video/photes kyle discussed/Kermit exposed with Freebirds confirmation
3. hero moving forward with his promise of an investigation of jan vs.
4. rudy's call for an investigation because of the phone conversations btwn paulass/jan vs
5??
what do we think will bring Justice for Natalee??


I do not believe that justice for Natalee Holloway is going to come from a Dutch/Aruban courtroom.  The domino effect of accountability is too far reaching.  There are those involed in the happening that encompassed the morning of May 30, 2005.  There are those at all levels of the Aruban/Dutch administration who are participants in the cover.  There is the judiciary in regards to their favorable rulings on behalf of the suspects.  Then there are those who are participants in Aruba's underground economy which encompasses drugs, alcohol, sex trade, gambling, money laundering ...

However ... Kyle Kingman and Tim Trahan have the ability to expose to the FBI ... from first hand observation ...  John Silvetti's participation in the finale to the great Aruban coverup. Kyle Kingman and Tim Trahan have the ability to expose to the FBI ... from first hand observation ... the contents of that trap/cage.

When the case is closed ... the FBI can take over and ... maybe ... just maybe ... a measure of closure can be afforded to the family of Natalee Holloway ... a measure of closure knowing that their beloved could possibly have been in that trap/cage.

Hopefully ... something is currently going on behind the scenes.  Think about it.  The Natalee's Freebirds forwarded a compiled account of Kyle Kingsmans posts to the FBI, John Kelly and Beth Holloway.

Janet

+++++++


Growing Frustration in Aruba
Wednesday, July 06, 2005


GEORGE "JUG" TWITTY: Well, the way the system works down here, when the case is closed, we will have all that information, and we can release it to the world.

http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,161705,00.html


Art Wood
DANA PRETZER
July 2, 2006 - Part 1
July 8, 2006 - Part 2


The family of Natalee needs to put pressure on the US attorney in Birmingham to push the FBI to conduct an investigation after ALE close the case. We have a treaty that allows the FBI to pursue a violation of civil rights of an American citizen there.


'Rita Cosby Live & Direct' for December 1
updated 7:37 a.m. PT, Fri., Dec. 2, 2005


ART WOOD, FORMER SECRET SERVICE AGENT: Absolutely. Absolutely. There's a lot that Americans can do through the State Department. I want to remind everybody that Natalee Holloway was a U.S. citizen. Once the Aruban authorities are done investigating this case, the FBI can still conduct an investigation, and they could extradite these suspects to the United States. Let me point out that there's a ton of circumstantial evidence in this case to convict these kids.

http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/10295536/

Janet...I completely agree! What the persistence ownership (louis) project lead (john) dive lead (tim) and specialist (kyle) did is within the realm of accountability (fraud-obstruction of justice wrt an American citizen) at least through my laymen eyes. The FBI and State Department need to put a FULL COURT PRESS on this to get to the Truth of what they know/did...At the least...FBI/State Deptartment need to expose this...


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #797 1/30/09 -
Post by: Keepthefaith on February 01, 2009, 12:01:41 AM
GOOD NIGHT MONKEYS!!!  GOOD NIGHT ZOOKEEPERS!!!

Magnolia ... my sweater!!!  I know I am going to be a frozen little popsicle in the morning.  The temperatures are dipping below freezing.

 ::MonkeyWaa::

Janet
9:00 PM PT

GoodNight and God Bless Janet!


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #797 1/30/09 -
Post by: Tamikosmom on February 01, 2009, 12:01:59 AM
Interesting night, it's a shame hotshot won't stay and take the heat she and bastibro stirred up? Not surprising now is it?

I have a couple of things to say here and I don't say much often, so I hope some of you will indulge me. I'm not a true 'insider' as hotshot and ldstlou claim to be but I can tell you this much, the family is TIRED of watching what's happening on this thread. That I do know on good authority.

Also, this is for hotshot. I recall who began the first acting out against SM way back at the beginning of this and it was you and Ringo. Some of us foolishly let you plant half-truth's in our heads and/or make us doubt the intent of some who never deserved that. You have one outrageous audacity to state it's SM creating all of the issues now.

Some of us remember the history and I would think after four years of you inserting yourself as the super sleuth above all others to the degree that Dave won't even give you his phone number, that you could buy a clue !

I will repeat, the family is not happy to see all of these drive-by attacks and if you respect them, you will respect their feelings and the intent of this forum to support Natalee above all else.



 ::MonkeyShocked::

Janet

Not us Janet.

I know San.  But ... but ... we are being watched.  Some of our guests must be family.

 ::cartwheel::

Janet


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #797 1/30/09 -
Post by: San on February 01, 2009, 12:02:18 AM
I got knocked off and had to reboot.
Janet, I am working hard on your goat wool sweater.
Kermit's little leg warmers won't take but a minute.
San, I will be honored to make you a new hat.
I am a very fast knitter.
Remember that is all that I am good for.

 ::MonkeyHaHa::

You're a good cook too.  What's for dinner.  ::MonkeyHaHa::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #797 1/30/09 -
Post by: Keepthefaith on February 01, 2009, 12:03:40 AM
Interesting night, it's a shame hotshot won't stay and take the heat she and bastibro stirred up? Not surprising now is it?

I have a couple of things to say here and I don't say much often, so I hope some of you will indulge me. I'm not a true 'insider' as hotshot and ldstlou claim to be but I can tell you this much, the family is TIRED of watching what's happening on this thread. That I do know on good authority.

Also, this is for hotshot. I recall who began the first acting out against SM way back at the beginning of this and it was you and Ringo. Some of us foolishly let you plant half-truth's in our heads and/or make us doubt the intent of some who never deserved that. You have one outrageous audacity to state it's SM creating all of the issues now.

Some of us remember the history and I would think after four years of you inserting yourself as the super sleuth above all others to the degree that Dave won't even give you his phone number, that you could buy a clue !

I will repeat, the family is not happy to see all of these drive-by attacks and if you respect them, you will respect their feelings and the intent of this forum to support Natalee above all else.



 ::MonkeyShocked::

Janet

Not us Janet.

I know San.  But ... but ... we are being watched.  Some of our guests must be family.

 ::cartwheel::

Janet

They give us strength when we least expect it Janet!They know that the Monkey's will  never,ever give up! ::MonkeyWink::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #797 1/30/09 -
Post by: nonesuche on February 01, 2009, 12:04:15 AM
Janet and Blue Moon, I was not speaking about you. I guess it was obvious that this was concerning the drive-by attacks on SM posters that may disagree with the chat/grumble/hotshot/whoever else new forum group. I hope you will continue to post and allow for differing opinions that are presented respectfully just as you have for some time now. This isn't my forum nor would I want to impact the normal flow here, I was only sharing feedback which I had heard firsthand.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #797 1/30/09 -
Post by: Tamikosmom on February 01, 2009, 12:06:03 AM
Janet and Blue Moon, I was not speaking about you. I guess it was obvious that this was concerning the drive-by attacks on SM posters that may disagree with the chat/grumble/hotshot/whoever else new forum group. I hope you will continue to post and allow for differing opinions that are presented respectfully just as you have for some time now. This isn't my forum nor would I want to impact the normal flow here, I was only sharing feedback which I had heard firsthand.

Thank you none.

Hugs

Janet


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #797 1/30/09 -
Post by: 2NJSons_Mom on February 01, 2009, 12:06:14 AM
I got knocked off and had to reboot.
Janet, I am working hard on your goat wool sweater.
Kermit's little leg warmers won't take but a minute.
San, I will be honored to make you a new hat.
I am a very fast knitter.
Remember that is all that I am good for.

That is BS.  Bastibro Sh*t


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #797 1/30/09 -
Post by: Keepthefaith on February 01, 2009, 12:06:20 AM
Interesting night, it's a shame hotshot won't stay and take the heat she and bastibro stirred up? Not surprising now is it?

I have a couple of things to say here and I don't say much often, so I hope some of you will indulge me. I'm not a true 'insider' as hotshot and ldstlou claim to be but I can tell you this much, the family is TIRED of watching what's happening on this thread. That I do know on good authority.

Also, this is for hotshot. I recall who began the first acting out against SM way back at the beginning of this and it was you and Ringo. Some of us foolishly let you plant half-truth's in our heads and/or make us doubt the intent of some who never deserved that. You have one outrageous audacity to state it's SM creating all of the issues now.

Some of us remember the history and I would think after four years of you inserting yourself as the super sleuth above all others to the degree that Dave won't even give you his phone number, that you could buy a clue !

I will repeat, the family is not happy to see all of these drive-by attacks and if you respect them, you will respect their feelings and the intent of this forum to support Natalee above all else.



 ::MonkeyShocked::

Janet

Not us Janet.

I know San.  But ... but ... we are being watched.  Some of our guests must be family.

 ::cartwheel::

Janet

They give us strength when we least expect it Janet!They know that the Monkey's will  never,ever give up! ::MonkeyWink::

I also belive that the CnG repetitive drive-by's is actually bringing Monkey's together on another level.STAY FOCUSED.THE PERSISTENCE IS WHERE IT'S AT!


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #797 1/30/09 -
Post by: Tamikosmom on February 01, 2009, 12:07:13 AM
I got knocked off and had to reboot.
Janet, I am working hard on your goat wool sweater.
Kermit's little leg warmers won't take but a minute.
San, I will be honored to make you a new hat.
I am a very fast knitter.
Remember that is all that I am good for.

 ::MonkeyHaHa::

Magnolia ... you are a hoot.

Good Night

Janet


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #797 1/30/09 -
Post by: San on February 01, 2009, 12:08:52 AM
I got knocked off and had to reboot.
Janet, I am working hard on your goat wool sweater.
Kermit's little leg warmers won't take but a minute.
San, I will be honored to make you a new hat.
I am a very fast knitter.
Remember that is all that I am good for.

 ::MonkeyHaHa::

Magnolia ... you are a hoot.

Good Night

Janet

Magnolia is always right on target with her posts and a very good judge of character.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #797 1/30/09 -
Post by: Tamikosmom on February 01, 2009, 12:09:15 AM


I know San.  But ... but ... we are being watched.  Some of our guests must be family.

 ::cartwheel::

Janet

They give us strength when we least expect it Janet!They know that the Monkey's will  never,ever give up! ::MonkeyWink::

I agree Keepthefaith.  I am encouraged ... I think.

I hope I am comprehending correctly.

 ::MonkeyNoNo::

Good Night

Janet


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #797 1/30/09 -
Post by: Blue Moon on February 01, 2009, 12:09:27 AM
Janet and Blue Moon, I was not speaking about you. I guess it was obvious that this was concerning the drive-by attacks on SM posters that may disagree with the chat/grumble/hotshot/whoever else new forum group. I hope you will continue to post and allow for differing opinions that are presented respectfully just as you have for some time now. This isn't my forum nor would I want to impact the normal flow here, I was only sharing feedback which I had heard firsthand.

Thanks.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #797 1/30/09 -
Post by: Magnolia on February 01, 2009, 12:10:13 AM
I know we are all hoping for some sign that the investigation into the disappearance (murder) of Natalee is still making progress...do we have a list of the possible ways that may be happening?
1. civil case brought on behave of Beth in Netherlands court.
2. FBI looking into persistence involvement wrt to video/photes kyle discussed/Kermit exposed with Freebirds confirmation
3. hero moving forward with his promise of an investigation of jan vs.
4. rudy's call for an investigation because of the phone conversations btwn paulass/jan vs
5??
what do we think will bring Justice for Natalee??


I do not believe that justice for Natalee Holloway is going to come from a Dutch/Aruban courtroom.  The domino effect of accountability is too far reaching.  There are those involed in the happening that encompassed the morning of May 30, 2005.  There are those at all levels of the Aruban/Dutch administration who are participants in the cover.  There is the judiciary in regards to their favorable rulings on behalf of the suspects.  Then there are those who are participants in Aruba's underground economy which encompasses drugs, alcohol, sex trade, gambling, money laundering ...

However ... Kyle Kingman and Tim Trahan have the ability to expose to the FBI ... from first hand observation ...  John Silvetti's participation in the finale to the great Aruban coverup. Kyle Kingman and Tim Trahan have the ability to expose to the FBI ... from first hand observation ... the contents of that trap/cage.

When the case is closed ... the FBI can take over and ... maybe ... just maybe ... a measure of closure can be afforded to the family of Natalee Holloway ... a measure of closure knowing that their beloved could possibly have been in that trap/cage.

Hopefully ... something is currently going on behind the scenes.  Think about it.  The Natalee's Freebirds forwarded a compiled account of Kyle Kingsmans posts to the FBI, John Kelly and Beth Holloway.

Janet

+++++++


Growing Frustration in Aruba
Wednesday, July 06, 2005


GEORGE "JUG" TWITTY: Well, the way the system works down here, when the case is closed, we will have all that information, and we can release it to the world.

http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,161705,00.html


Art Wood
DANA PRETZER
July 2, 2006 - Part 1
July 8, 2006 - Part 2


The family of Natalee needs to put pressure on the US attorney in Birmingham to push the FBI to conduct an investigation after ALE close the case. We have a treaty that allows the FBI to pursue a violation of civil rights of an American citizen there.


'Rita Cosby Live & Direct' for December 1
updated 7:37 a.m. PT, Fri., Dec. 2, 2005


ART WOOD, FORMER SECRET SERVICE AGENT: Absolutely. Absolutely. There's a lot that Americans can do through the State Department. I want to remind everybody that Natalee Holloway was a U.S. citizen. Once the Aruban authorities are done investigating this case, the FBI can still conduct an investigation, and they could extradite these suspects to the United States. Let me point out that there's a ton of circumstantial evidence in this case to convict these kids.

http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/10295536/

Janet...I completely agree! What the persistence ownership (louis) project lead (john) dive lead (tim) and specialist (kyle) did is within the realm of accountability (fraud-obstruction of justice wrt an American citizen) at least through my laymen eyes. The FBI and State Department need to put a FULL COURT PRESS on this to get to the Truth of what they know/did...At the least...FBI/State Deptartment need to expose this...


I would like to see them all arrested.  Bet we might get some answers then.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #797 1/30/09 -
Post by: always 1 on February 01, 2009, 12:11:54 AM
Good night monkeys.  Janet, thank you for always protecting me. I am going to go drink some green hinky tea and go to sleep.  (Tibro, I hope we are friends)


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #797 1/30/09 -
Post by: Keepthefaith on February 01, 2009, 12:12:43 AM
Magnolia

I would think,in a case like this,the Govt would give it some time and let them nail their coffin shut if it is to happen!I pray!


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #797 1/30/09 -
Post by: Keepthefaith on February 01, 2009, 12:13:10 AM
Good night monkeys.  Janet, thank you for always protecting me. I am going to go drink some green hinky tea and go to sleep.  (Tibro, I hope we are friends)

Goodnight A1!


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #797 1/30/09 -
Post by: hotping on February 01, 2009, 12:14:20 AM
Good Night Always1 and Janet!


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #797 1/30/09 -
Post by: texasmom on February 01, 2009, 12:16:21 AM
I got knocked off and had to reboot.
Janet, I am working hard on your goat wool sweater.
Kermit's little leg warmers won't take but a minute.
San, I will be honored to make you a new hat.
I am a very fast knitter.
Remember that is all that I am good for.

That is BS.  Bastibro Sh*t

That's right, and if the truth were told it's probably even worse than BS. 

You are a very fine and wise monkey, that is of great value to all of us here; your knitting is just an extra bonus.    ::MonkeyWink::

We want Justice for Natalee, we're working together to find it; and we're never giving up!



Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #797 1/30/09 -
Post by: Tamikosmom on February 01, 2009, 12:16:41 AM
Good night monkeys.  Janet, thank you for always protecting me. I am going to go drink some green hinky tea and go to sleep.  (Tibro, I hope we are friends)

I am alone but not lonely.  My hubby is bowling tonight so ... I think I will read a couple chapters of hinky book.

 ::MonkeyHaHa::

Good Night.

Janet
9:15 PM PT


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #797 1/30/09 -
Post by: Magnolia on February 01, 2009, 12:17:06 AM
Night Janet and A1

Janet you always keep me well informed.
A1 you make me giggle.
Both are great qualities.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #797 1/30/09 -
Post by: texasmom on February 01, 2009, 12:17:44 AM



Goodnight Janet and Always1!   ::MonkeyCool::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #797 1/30/09 -
Post by: Keepthefaith on February 01, 2009, 12:37:39 AM
MOVIE TIME.... ::MonkeyDance:: Check back in after the movie is over! ::MonkeyDance::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #797 1/30/09 -
Post by: texasmom on February 01, 2009, 12:41:48 AM
(http://i21.photobucket.com/albums/b258/texasmom55/Natalee/CarpeNhhiuh8iiuu-1-2-2.png)


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #797 1/30/09 -
Post by: Blue Moon on February 01, 2009, 01:06:27 AM
going to call it a night.  Got to make trip to TN tomorrow to see my cousin who will be 92 years young.  In a nursing home and just wants family to share her birthday with her. My mother and her were raised as "sisters" and she is the last surviving member of that family besides my family and one nephew.  After working today I don't feel like it but I don't want to hurt her. My mother would never forgive me if she was alive.

Have a good night.  JUSTICE FOR NATALEE is what we are here for.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #797 1/30/09 -
Post by: hotping on February 01, 2009, 01:11:02 AM
going to call it a night.  Got to make trip to TN tomorrow to see my cousin who will be 92 years young.  In a nursing home and just wants family to share her birthday with her. My mother and her were raised as "sisters" and she is the last surviving member of that family besides my family and one nephew.  After working today I don't feel like it but I don't want to hurt her. My mother would never forgive me if she was alive.

Have a good night.  JUSTICE FOR NATALEE is what we are here for.
Good Night Blue Moon..Have a Safe Trip!


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #797 1/30/09 -
Post by: texasmom on February 01, 2009, 01:14:42 AM
going to call it a night.  Got to make trip to TN tomorrow to see my cousin who will be 92 years young.  In a nursing home and just wants family to share her birthday with her. My mother and her were raised as "sisters" and she is the last surviving member of that family besides my family and one nephew.  After working today I don't feel like it but I don't want to hurt her. My mother would never forgive me if she was alive.

Have a good night.  JUSTICE FOR NATALEE is what we are here for.

Goodnight Blue Moon!  Hope you have a good trip!   ::MonkeyCool::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #797 1/30/09 -
Post by: billb's daughter on February 01, 2009, 01:15:46 AM
Good night texasmom, Mere, MuffyBee, ospainter, spooky112483, hotping, SurfCity, Magnolia, cajun miracle, Hotshot, hummingbird7525, Tamikosmom, Icehawk and 18 Guests are viewing this topic.
Hotshot.....come back with back up of your position....not circular BS..
Thank you...billb... ::MonkeyCool::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #797 1/30/09 -
Post by: Hotshot on February 01, 2009, 01:25:17 AM
How's your day Kermit?  Don't think anyone wants to talk face to face with you today.

Hotshot probably ran off to get her poop suit.


I ran off to go do CPR on a woman who is now dead.  Have some freakin manners will you.  Theatrics is not my style, if it were I'd be on here all day... Anna, sorry I didn't have time to answer you, I was a bit busy the last few hours...  But forget it now.  And if Lalas contacted Dave so be it, I also did just to set the record straight.  KMA also Hotping. 


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #797 1/30/09 -
Post by: billb's daughter on February 01, 2009, 01:28:01 AM
How's your day Kermit?  Don't think anyone wants to talk face to face with you today.

Hotshot probably ran off to get her poop suit.


I ran off to go do CPR on a woman who is now dead.  Have some freakin manners will you.  Theatrics is not my style, if it were I'd be on here all day... Anna, sorry I didn't have time to answer you, I was a bit busy the last few hours...  But forget it now.  And if Lalas contacted Dave so be it, I also did just to set the record straight.  KMA also Hotping. 
Hotshot.....come back with back up of your position....not circular BS..


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #797 1/30/09 -
Post by: hotping on February 01, 2009, 01:30:30 AM
How's your day Kermit?  Don't think anyone wants to talk face to face with you today.

Hotshot probably ran off to get her poop suit.


I ran off to go do CPR on a woman who is now dead.  Have some freakin manners will you.  Theatrics is not my style, if it were I'd be on here all day... Anna, sorry I didn't have time to answer you, I was a bit busy the last few hours...  But forget it now.  And if Lalas contacted Dave so be it, I also did just to set the record straight.  KMA also Hotping. 
  ::MonkeyHaHa:: ::MonkeyHaHa:: You are a CS...Hotshot!


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #797 1/30/09 -
Post by: texasmom on February 01, 2009, 01:31:30 AM
Good night texasmom, Mere, MuffyBee, ospainter, spooky112483, hotping, SurfCity, Magnolia, cajun miracle, Hotshot, hummingbird7525, Tamikosmom, Icehawk and 18 Guests are viewing this topic.
Hotshot.....come back with back up of your position....not circular BS..
Thank you...billb... ::MonkeyCool::

Goodnight billb!   ::MonkeyCool::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #797 1/30/09 -
Post by: truthseeker2 on February 01, 2009, 01:42:20 AM
How's your day Kermit?  Don't think anyone wants to talk face to face with you today.

Hotshot probably ran off to get her poop suit.


I ran off to go do CPR on a woman who is now dead.  Have some freakin manners will you.  Theatrics is not my style, if it were I'd be on here all day... Anna, sorry I didn't have time to answer you, I was a bit busy the last few hours...  But forget it now.  And if Lalas contacted Dave so be it, I also did just to set the record straight.  KMA also Hotping. 

Very sorry to here about that, Hotshot.  That must be difficult to deal with.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #797 1/30/09 -
Post by: Mere on February 01, 2009, 01:42:56 AM
Hotshot....do you know about HIPAA Laws...?  I think that first sentence about the patient should be deleted.  I am not sure but it seems that it would be a good idea never to mention specifics with patients in the work that you do.....Mere


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #797 1/30/09 -
Post by: texasmom on February 01, 2009, 01:44:35 AM
Interesting night, it's a shame hotshot won't stay and take the heat she and bastibro stirred up? Not surprising now is it?

I have a couple of things to say here and I don't say much often, so I hope some of you will indulge me. I'm not a true 'insider' as hotshot and ldstlou claim to be but I can tell you this much, the family is TIRED of watching what's happening on this thread. That I do know on good authority.

Also, this is for hotshot. I recall who began the first acting out against SM way back at the beginning of this and it was you and Ringo. Some of us foolishly let you plant half-truth's in our heads and/or make us doubt the intent of some who never deserved that. You have one outrageous audacity to state it's SM creating all of the issues now.

Some of us remember the history and I would think after four years of you inserting yourself as the super sleuth above all others to the degree that Dave won't even give you his phone number, that you could buy a clue !

I will repeat, the family is not happy to see all of these drive-by attacks and if you respect them, you will respect their feelings and the intent of this forum to support Natalee above all else.



bump


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #797 1/30/09 -
Post by: Hotshot on February 01, 2009, 01:51:22 AM
Hotshot....do you know about HIPAA Laws...?  I think that first sentence about the patient should be deleted.  I am not sure but it seems that it would be a good idea never to mention specifics with patients in the work that you do.....Mere
Mere, I am an EMT, and yes I know my HIPAA Laws.  The fact that a name, birthdate, town or lisence wasnt given means I did not break the law.  Do you know them?

Truthseeker, Thanks is not easy... I knew the family personally.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #797 1/30/09 -
Post by: Mere on February 01, 2009, 02:01:09 AM
Good Night Monkeys.....


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #797 1/30/09 -
Post by: billb's daughter on February 01, 2009, 02:04:44 AM
Hotshot....do you know about HIPAA Laws...?  I think that first sentence about the patient should be deleted.  I am not sure but it seems that it would be a good idea never to mention specifics with patients in the work that you do.....Mere
Mere, I am an EMT, and yes I know my HIPAA Laws.  The fact that a name, birthdate, town or lisence wasnt given means I did not break the law.  Do you know them?

Truthseeker, Thanks is not easy... I knew the family personally.
Hotshot...I get that you had a rough time..knowing the family under the conditions is tough. My prayers go out to you and the family...
But please take a moment when you can....and recognize that it is about Justice for Natalee...not your drama...that brings us here to SM....
So...bring proof/backup to your attacks against Kermit/Freebirds and proof/backup supporting kyle..CAPS...or drop it (goes to my comment about circular BS).
I do recognize that you go to Aruba marketing events in the US to protest...but it is beyond my ability to process logically how on the one hand...you can do that; and on the other..attack the messenger (Kermit?Freebirds) when they are only EXPOSING kyle's OWN words....


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #797 1/30/09 -
Post by: texasmom on February 01, 2009, 02:08:23 AM
Good Night Monkeys.....

Goodnight Mere!   ::MonkeyCool::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #797 1/30/09 -
Post by: billb's daughter on February 01, 2009, 02:14:42 AM
16 Guests are viewing this topic.
Jump in..say what is on your minds...life is good for your all I hope...Contribute and Let's get Justice for Natalee!!...your posts may get Monkeys on the path that will lead to Justice for Natalee!!
mhoo..billb


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #797 1/30/09 -
Post by: billb's daughter on February 01, 2009, 02:17:06 AM
Good night texasmom, Mere, MuffyBee, ospainter, spooky112483, hotping, SurfCity, Magnolia, cajun miracle, Hotshot, hummingbird7525, Tamikosmom, Icehawk and 18 Guests are viewing this topic.
Hotshot.....come back with back up of your position....not circular BS..
Thank you...billb... ::MonkeyCool::

Goodnight billb!   ::MonkeyCool::
Sometimes I have to come back..after all..I'm 99 yrs old..how many times can I come bank?...I don't know..
Good Night TM.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #797 1/30/09 -
Post by: texasmom on February 01, 2009, 02:19:26 AM
Good night texasmom, Mere, MuffyBee, ospainter, spooky112483, hotping, SurfCity, Magnolia, cajun miracle, Hotshot, hummingbird7525, Tamikosmom, Icehawk and 18 Guests are viewing this topic.
Hotshot.....come back with back up of your position....not circular BS..
Thank you...billb... ::MonkeyCool::

Goodnight billb!   ::MonkeyCool::
Sometimes I have to come back..after all..I'm 99 yrs old..how many times can I come bank?...I don't know..
Good Night TM.

billb, we all know you're like the energizer bunny...you just keep going, and going, and going..you've probably got at least another 150 years to go!

Goodnight billb!   ::MonkeyCool::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #797 1/30/09 -
Post by: billb's daughter on February 01, 2009, 02:24:10 AM
Good night texasmom, Mere, MuffyBee, ospainter, spooky112483, hotping, SurfCity, Magnolia, cajun miracle, Hotshot, hummingbird7525, Tamikosmom, Icehawk and 18 Guests are viewing this topic.
Hotshot.....come back with back up of your position....not circular BS..
Thank you...billb... ::MonkeyCool::

Goodnight billb!   ::MonkeyCool::
Sometimes I have to come back..after all..I'm 99 yrs old..how many times can I come back?...I don't know..
Good Night TM.
Darnit..preview before you post, preview before you post...preview before you post!...I don't want anyone to think that I am Janet :) ...who needs tons of mods to fix her posts....after the fact... ::MonkeyCool::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #797 1/30/09 -
Post by: hotping on February 01, 2009, 02:27:15 AM
Good night texasmom, Mere, MuffyBee, ospainter, spooky112483, hotping, SurfCity, Magnolia, cajun miracle, Hotshot, hummingbird7525, Tamikosmom, Icehawk and 18 Guests are viewing this topic.
Hotshot.....come back with back up of your position....not circular BS..
Thank you...billb... ::MonkeyCool::

Goodnight billb!   ::MonkeyCool::
Sometimes I have to come back..after all..I'm 99 yrs old..how many times can I come back?...I don't know..
Good Night TM.
Darnit..preview before you post, preview before you post...preview before you post!...I don't want anyone to think that I am Janet :) ...who needs tons of mods to fix her posts....after the fact... ::MonkeyCool::
Good Night billb...Thanks for the laughs!  ::MonkeyWink:: ::MonkeyHaHa::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #797 1/30/09 -
Post by: Hotshot on February 01, 2009, 02:28:27 AM
Hotshot....do you know about HIPAA Laws...?  I think that first sentence about the patient should be deleted.  I am not sure but it seems that it would be a good idea never to mention specifics with patients in the work that you do.....Mere
Mere, I am an EMT, and yes I know my HIPAA Laws.  The fact that a name, birthdate, town or lisence wasnt given means I did not break the law.  Do you know them?

Truthseeker, Thanks is not easy... I knew the family personally.
Hotshot...I get that you had a rough time..knowing the family under the conditions is tough. My prayers go out to you and the family...
But please take a moment when you can....and recognize that it is about Justice for Natalee...not your drama...that brings us here to SM....
So...bring proof/backup to your attacks against Kermit/Freebirds and proof/backup supporting kyle..CAPS...or drop it (goes to my comment about circular BS).
I do recognize that you go to Aruba marketing events in the US to protest...but it is beyond my ability to process logically how on the one hand...you can do that; and on the other..attack the messenger (Kermit?Freebirds) when they are only EXPOSING kyle's OWN words....

They all asked where I went, so I told them.  It's not about my drama, just explaining where I went to.  I do go to the events yes, and I am not attacking Kermit for what she thinks happened.  I am atacking because she is not telling all.  Kyle went to them to share his adventure, and ask what he should do.  He went to them in confidence.  Not to be posted all over the internet, and ruin his chances for future jobs in his proffession.  His own words WERE taken out of context, and yes there was an FBI guy he was working with.  He has been taken off the case, and he was as corrupt as the Arubans.  As far as the family goes, I know Dave is hating what is going on also.  Its not just the attacks its the whole thing.  SM is not SM anymore.  its a circus with name calling and such.  We ALL are seeking justice, in differnet ways, and they know that.  They really do know that.  They knew what I was doing before I did it.  They know most of all we talk about.  For you certain people who dont respect me anymore is fine.  I did what I did with the OK of family.  I sent them all I knew, and all I thought was of good concern.  Dave didnt give anyone his number, he just unplugged the phone.  He still has cells, and other ways to talk with him, as HE told me.  I have talked with him and he is sick.  Cant you guys just get to a normal way of being the way you were just for the sake of the family, without bashing everyone who has a different view?


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #797 1/30/09 -
Post by: texasmom on February 01, 2009, 02:29:14 AM
Good night texasmom, Mere, MuffyBee, ospainter, spooky112483, hotping, SurfCity, Magnolia, cajun miracle, Hotshot, hummingbird7525, Tamikosmom, Icehawk and 18 Guests are viewing this topic.
Hotshot.....come back with back up of your position....not circular BS..
Thank you...billb... ::MonkeyCool::

Goodnight billb!   ::MonkeyCool::
Sometimes I have to come back..after all..I'm 99 yrs old..how many times can I come back?...I don't know..
Good Night TM.
Darnit..preview before you post, preview before you post...preview before you post!...I don't want anyone to think that I am Janet :) ...who needs tons of mods to fix her posts....after the fact... ::MonkeyCool::

I didn't even notice it until you pointed it out!   ::MonkeyHaHa::



Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #797 1/30/09 -
Post by: Keepthefaith on February 01, 2009, 02:36:21 AM
Great to be back!Movie was fantastic and i see i came at the right time!


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #797 1/30/09 -
Post by: billb's daughter on February 01, 2009, 02:40:28 AM

[/quote]
Hotshot...I get that you had a rough time..knowing the family under the conditions is tough. My prayers go out to you and the family...
But please take a moment when you can....and recognize that it is about Justice for Natalee...not your drama...that brings us here to SM....
So...bring proof/backup to your attacks against Kermit/Freebirds and proof/backup supporting kyle..CAPS...or drop it (goes to my comment about circular BS).
I do recognize that you go to Aruba marketing events in the US to protest...but it is beyond my ability to process logically how on the one hand...you can do that; and on the other..attack the messenger (Kermit?Freebirds) when they are only EXPOSING kyle's OWN words....

[/quote]
They all asked where I went, so I told them.  It's not about my drama, just explaining where I went to.  I do go to the events yes, and I am not attacking Kermit for what she thinks happened.  I am atacking because she is not telling all.  Kyle went to them to share his adventure, and ask what he should do.  He went to them in confidence.  Not to be posted all over the internet, and ruin his chances for future jobs in his proffession.  His own words WERE taken out of context, and yes there was an FBI guy he was working with.  He has been taken off the case, and he was as corrupt as the Arubans.  As far as the family goes, I know Dave is hating what is going on also.  Its not just the attacks its the whole thing.  SM is not SM anymore.  its a circus with name calling and such.  We ALL are seeking justice, in differnet ways, and they know that.  They really do know that.  They knew what I was doing before I did it.  They know most of all we talk about.  For you certain people who dont respect me anymore is fine.  I did what I did with the OK of family.  I sent them all I knew, and all I thought was of good concern.  Dave didnt give anyone his number, he just unplugged the phone.  He still has cells, and other ways to talk with him, as HE told me.  I have talked with him and he is sick.  Cant you guys just get to a normal way of being the way you were just for the sake of the family, without bashing everyone who has a different view?
[/quote]
So...bring proof/backup to your attacks against Kermit/Freebirds and proof/backup supporting kyle..CAPS...or drop it (goes to my comment about circular BS).


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #797 1/30/09 -
Post by: Anna on February 01, 2009, 02:40:36 AM
How's your day Kermit?  Don't think anyone wants to talk face to face with you today.

Hotshot probably ran off to get her poop suit.


I ran off to go do CPR on a woman who is now dead.  Have some freakin manners will you.  Theatrics is not my style, if it were I'd be on here all day... Anna, sorry I didn't have time to answer you, I was a bit busy the last few hours...  But forget it now.  And if Lalas contacted Dave so be it, I also did just to set the record straight.  KMA also Hotping. 


And you STILL refuse to answer me.

Did Lala's tell you I reported her to the FBI or filed a complaint with them about her as you posted here that I did.

Simple question.


YES or NO????

You are the one who attacked me and I had not said one harsh word to you.  You are the one making all the trouble and attacking people here. 

I don't want to hear your drama at all.  We all have drama in our lives and manage without using it as an excuse for our behavior

So ANSWER THE QUESTION.  YES, Lalas said that or NO she didn't and you are lying about it.



Doesn't take any time at all to post a two or three letter word. 



Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #797 1/30/09 -
Post by: Keepthefaith on February 01, 2009, 02:40:57 AM
Interesting night, it's a shame hotshot won't stay and take the heat she and bastibro stirred up? Not surprising now is it?

I have a couple of things to say here and I don't say much often, so I hope some of you will indulge me. I'm not a true 'insider' as hotshot and ldstlou claim to be but I can tell you this much, the family is TIRED of watching what's happening on this thread. That I do know on good authority.

Also, this is for hotshot.  I recall who began the first acting out against SM way back at the beginning of this and it was you and Ringo. Some of us foolishly let you plant half-truth's in our heads and/or make us doubt the intent of some who never deserved that. You have one outrageous audacity to state it's SM creating all of the issues now.

Some of us remember the history and I would think after four years of you inserting yourself as the super sleuth above all others to the degree that Dave won't even give you his phone number, that you could buy a clue !

I will repeat, the family is not happy to see all of these drive-by attacks and if you respect them, you will respect their feelings and the intent of this forum to support Natalee above all else.



HotShot ::MonkeyWink::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #797 1/30/09 -
Post by: billb's daughter on February 01, 2009, 02:41:09 AM

Hotshot...I get that you had a rough time..knowing the family under the conditions is tough. My prayers go out to you and the family...
But please take a moment when you can....and recognize that it is about Justice for Natalee...not your drama...that brings us here to SM....
So...bring proof/backup to your attacks against Kermit/Freebirds and proof/backup supporting kyle..CAPS...or drop it (goes to my comment about circular BS).
I do recognize that you go to Aruba marketing events in the US to protest...but it is beyond my ability to process logically how on the one hand...you can do that; and on the other..attack the messenger (Kermit?Freebirds) when they are only EXPOSING kyle's OWN words....

[/quote]
They all asked where I went, so I told them.  It's not about my drama, just explaining where I went to.  I do go to the events yes, and I am not attacking Kermit for what she thinks happened.  I am atacking because she is not telling all.  Kyle went to them to share his adventure, and ask what he should do.  He went to them in confidence.  Not to be posted all over the internet, and ruin his chances for future jobs in his proffession.  His own words WERE taken out of context, and yes there was an FBI guy he was working with.  He has been taken off the case, and he was as corrupt as the Arubans.  As far as the family goes, I know Dave is hating what is going on also.  Its not just the attacks its the whole thing.  SM is not SM anymore.  its a circus with name calling and such.  We ALL are seeking justice, in differnet ways, and they know that.  They really do know that.  They knew what I was doing before I did it.  They know most of all we talk about.  For you certain people who dont respect me anymore is fine.  I did what I did with the OK of family.  I sent them all I knew, and all I thought was of good concern.  Dave didnt give anyone his number, he just unplugged the phone.  He still has cells, and other ways to talk with him, as HE told me.  I have talked with him and he is sick.  Cant you guys just get to a normal way of being the way you were just for the sake of the family, without bashing everyone who has a different view?
[/quote]
So...bring proof/backup to your attacks against Kermit/Freebirds and proof/backup supporting kyle..CAPS...or drop it (goes to my comment about circular BS).
[/quote]


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #797 1/30/09 -
Post by: Anna on February 01, 2009, 02:42:44 AM
How's your day Kermit?  Don't think anyone wants to talk face to face with you today.

Hotshot probably ran off to get her poop suit.


I ran off to go do CPR on a woman who is now dead.  Have some freakin manners will you.  Theatrics is not my style, if it were I'd be on here all day... Anna, sorry I didn't have time to answer you, I was a bit busy the last few hours...  But forget it now.  And if Lalas contacted Dave so be it, I also did just to set the record straight.  KMA also Hotping. 


And you STILL refuse to answer me.

Did Lala's tell you I reported her to the FBI or filed a complaint with them about her as you posted here that I did.

Simple question.


YES or NO????

You are the one who attacked me and I had not said one harsh word to you.  You are the one making all the trouble and attacking people here. 

I don't want to hear your drama at all.  We all have drama in our lives and manage without using it as an excuse for our behavior

So ANSWER THE QUESTION.  YES, Lalas said that or NO she didn't and you are lying about it.



Doesn't take any time at all to post a two or three letter word. 




Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #797 1/30/09 -
Post by: Keepthefaith on February 01, 2009, 02:44:29 AM
HotShot?????????????

So ANSWER THE QUESTION.  YES, Lalas said that or NO she didn't and you are lying about it.



Doesn't take any time at all to post a two or three letter word. 


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #797 1/30/09 -
Post by: billb's daughter on February 01, 2009, 02:45:56 AM
Great to be back!Movie was fantastic and i see i came at the right time!
KTF..Turn around..Nice to see you're back... ::MonkeyDance::
I'm 99 yrs old, but according to TM...I have 150 yrs to go....so I'm taking the route of Benjamin Button..making me 51 yrs old now..... ::MonkeyDance::
Don't even think of calling me a stackaholic.... ::MonkeyCool::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #797 1/30/09 -
Post by: Anna on February 01, 2009, 02:46:13 AM
I find it very interesting how these drive by people have all the time in the world to launch their attacks.  But then become totally busy when asked to back up what they have claimed with a few facts.

Odd time management going on there.  Perhaps if they stayed off the phone annoying and stalking people they would have time to answer the questions their highly questionable accusations pose.

Yes, whatever happened to just civil disagreement?  When did a difference of opinion give these people the right to call a poster a liar, fraud, etc. with no proof whatsoever just based on their "feelings" or total blather?

We all disagree.  We don't demand a resume from other posters and try to insert ourselves into their private lives.  We simply state our disagreement and move on.  Why can't they do the same thing?


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #797 1/30/09 -
Post by: Kermit on February 01, 2009, 02:46:36 AM
Hotshot....do you know about HIPAA Laws...?  I think that first sentence about the patient should be deleted.  I am not sure but it seems that it would be a good idea never to mention specifics with patients in the work that you do.....Mere
Mere, I am an EMT, and yes I know my HIPAA Laws.  The fact that a name, birthdate, town or lisence wasnt given means I did not break the law.  Do you know them?

Truthseeker, Thanks is not easy... I knew the family personally.
Hotshot...I get that you had a rough time..knowing the family under the conditions is tough. My prayers go out to you and the family...
But please take a moment when you can....and recognize that it is about Justice for Natalee...not your drama...that brings us here to SM....
So...bring proof/backup to your attacks against Kermit/Freebirds and proof/backup supporting kyle..CAPS...or drop it (goes to my comment about circular BS).
I do recognize that you go to Aruba marketing events in the US to protest...but it is beyond my ability to process logically how on the one hand...you can do that; and on the other..attack the messenger (Kermit?Freebirds) when they are only EXPOSING kyle's OWN words....

They all asked where I went, so I told them.  It's not about my drama, just explaining where I went to.  I do go to the events yes, and I am not attacking Kermit for what she thinks happened.  I am atacking because she is not telling all.  Kyle went to them to share his adventure, and ask what he should do.  He went to them in confidence.  Not to be posted all over the internet, and ruin his chances for future jobs in his proffession.  His own words WERE taken out of context, and yes there was an FBI guy he was working with.  He has been taken off the case, and he was as corrupt as the Arubans.  As far as the family goes, I know Dave is hating what is going on also.  Its not just the attacks its the whole thing.  SM is not SM anymore.  its a circus with name calling and such.  We ALL are seeking justice, in differnet ways, and they know that.  They really do know that.  They knew what I was doing before I did it.  They know most of all we talk about.  For you certain people who dont respect me anymore is fine.  I did what I did with the OK of family.  I sent them all I knew, and all I thought was of good concern.  Dave didnt give anyone his number, he just unplugged the phone.  He still has cells, and other ways to talk with him, as HE told me.  I have talked with him and he is sick.  Cant you guys just get to a normal way of being the way you were just for the sake of the family, without bashing everyone who has a different view?


"Klye:  I did not give the information to the FBI and I'm unaware of anyone relaying the possibility to them.
pg 39http://scaredmonkeys.net/index.php?topic=4340.760


the freebirds respond:
"Nothing that was posted at SM by kermit was incorrect, out of context, or in any way false."
 

Regards,
 
Former Natalee's Freebirds Administrator
Natalee and her family deserve justice - and we will not let up until they have it!
/http://scaredmonkeys.net/index.php?topic=4269.860



Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #797 1/30/09 -
Post by: billb's daughter on February 01, 2009, 02:47:27 AM
HotShot?????????????

So ANSWER THE QUESTION.  YES, Lalas said that or NO she didn't and you are lying about it.



Doesn't take any time at all to post a two or three letter word. 

Circular BS comes to mind....


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #797 1/30/09 -
Post by: Keepthefaith on February 01, 2009, 02:48:29 AM
Great to be back!Movie was fantastic and i see i came at the right time!
KTF..Turn around..Nice to see you're back... ::MonkeyDance::
I'm 99 yrs old, but according to TM...I have 150 yrs to go....so I'm taking the route of Benjamin Button..making me 51 yrs old now..... ::MonkeyDance::
Don't even think of calling me a stackaholic.... ::MonkeyCool::

Was a great movie.WANTED with Angelina Jolie!No need to turn around.Full steam ahead through the BS.this is about JUSTICE FOR NATALEE... ::MonkeyCool::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #797 1/30/09 -
Post by: Anna on February 01, 2009, 02:48:37 AM
How's your day Kermit?  Don't think anyone wants to talk face to face with you today.

Hotshot probably ran off to get her poop suit.


I ran off to go do CPR on a woman who is now dead.  Have some freakin manners will you.  Theatrics is not my style, if it were I'd be on here all day... Anna, sorry I didn't have time to answer you, I was a bit busy the last few hours...  But forget it now.  And if Lalas contacted Dave so be it, I also did just to set the record straight.  KMA also Hotping. 


And you STILL refuse to answer me.

Did Lala's tell you I reported her to the FBI or filed a complaint with them about her as you posted here that I did.

Simple question.


YES or NO????

You are the one who attacked me and I had not said one harsh word to you.  You are the one making all the trouble and attacking people here. 

I don't want to hear your drama at all.  We all have drama in our lives and manage without using it as an excuse for our behavior

So ANSWER THE QUESTION.  YES, Lalas said that or NO she didn't and you are lying about it.



Doesn't take any time at all to post a two or three letter word. 





BUMP

I will not forget this nor let it go, HotShit!  You posted lies attacking me and now refuse to even answer my simple yes or no question.

Among other things.



Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #797 1/30/09 -
Post by: Kermit on February 01, 2009, 02:50:01 AM
Hotshot ATTACKING ANNA
Re: Natalee Case Discussion #791 1/6/09 -
« Reply #715 on: January 08, 2009, 09:13:35 PM »
Anna lied to dave
 and lied about *******
 anna is not so nice either
 she attacked and threatened so many its unreal
 called the fbi on lala cause she talked about lorenzo..lol
 damn straight im defending him
http://scaredmonkeys.net/index.php?topic=4351.msg618883#msg618883


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #797 1/30/09 -
Post by: Keepthefaith on February 01, 2009, 02:51:10 AM
Copy,paste,Copy,paste,copy,paste,

Who's got the duty this AM???Raise your hand!

Back to the hidey-hole.HEY.Back to the hidey-hole.HEY!

 ::MonkeyCool::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #797 1/30/09 -
Post by: Kermit on February 01, 2009, 02:51:11 AM
She took off.

 ::MonkeyNoNo::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #797 1/30/09 -
Post by: billb's daughter on February 01, 2009, 02:52:25 AM
Hotshot ATTACKING ANNA
Re: Natalee Case Discussion #791 1/6/09 -
« Reply #715 on: January 08, 2009, 09:13:35 PM »
Anna lied to dave
 and lied about *******
 anna is not so nice either
 she attacked and threatened so many its unreal
 called the fbi on lala cause she talked about lorenzo..lol
 damn straight im defending him
http://scaredmonkeys.net/index.php?topic=4351.msg618883#msg618883

Are there pics of hotshot & lorenzo 2??   ::MonkeyDance:: ::MonkeyDance::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #797 1/30/09 -
Post by: hotping on February 01, 2009, 02:53:41 AM
I find it very interesting how these drive by people have all the time in the world to launch their attacks.  But then become totally busy when asked to back up what they have claimed with a few facts.

Odd time management going on there.  Perhaps if they stayed off the phone annoying and stalking people they would have time to answer the questions their highly questionable accusations pose.

Yes, whatever happened to just civil disagreement?  When did a difference of opinion give these people the right to call a poster a liar, fraud, etc. with no proof whatsoever just based on their "feelings" or total blather?

We all disagree.  We don't demand a resume from other posters and try to insert ourselves into their private lives.  We simply state our disagreement and move on.  Why can't they do the same thing?
Yes...Its really strange that one of them comes in and starts trouble then later ask Us to behave and not upset the family... For days now everytime there is a discussion going on one of them comes on and disrupts the forum...Someone needs to get their poop straight on who's upsetting the family... ::MonkeyWink::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #797 1/30/09 -
Post by: Keepthefaith on February 01, 2009, 02:54:13 AM
She took off.

 ::MonkeyNoNo::

She's Lurking Kermit! ::MonkeyTongue::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #797 1/30/09 -
Post by: billb's daughter on February 01, 2009, 02:54:28 AM
Great to be back!Movie was fantastic and i see i came at the right time!
KTF..Turn around..Nice to see you're back... ::MonkeyDance::
I'm 99 yrs old, but according to TM...I have 150 yrs to go....so I'm taking the route of Benjamin Button..making me 51 yrs old now..... ::MonkeyDance::
Don't even think of calling me a stackaholic.... ::MonkeyCool::

Was a great movie.WANTED with Angelina Jolie!No need to turn around.Full steam ahead through the BS.this is about JUSTICE FOR NATALEE... ::MonkeyCool::
KTF...I WANTED with Angelina Jolie 2..Wife said NO...


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #797 1/30/09 -
Post by: Keepthefaith on February 01, 2009, 02:55:58 AM
Great to be back!Movie was fantastic and i see i came at the right time!
KTF..Turn around..Nice to see you're back... ::MonkeyDance::
I'm 99 yrs old, but according to TM...I have 150 yrs to go....so I'm taking the route of Benjamin Button..making me 51 yrs old now..... ::MonkeyDance::
Don't even think of calling me a stackaholic.... ::MonkeyCool::

Was a great movie.WANTED with Angelina Jolie!No need to turn around.Full steam ahead through the BS.this is about JUSTICE FOR NATALEE... ::MonkeyCool::
KTF...I WANTED with Angelina Jolie 2..Wife said NO...

I wouldn't mess with her you might upset Mr.Smith! ::MonkeyHaHa::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #797 1/30/09 -
Post by: hotping on February 01, 2009, 02:57:22 AM
She took off.

 ::MonkeyNoNo::
She's CS...She saw You and Anna and hightailed it.. ::MonkeyWink::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #797 1/30/09 -
Post by: billb's daughter on February 01, 2009, 02:57:50 AM
Great to be back!Movie was fantastic and i see i came at the right time!
KTF..Turn around..Nice to see you're back... ::MonkeyDance::
I'm 99 yrs old, but according to TM...I have 150 yrs to go....so I'm taking the route of Benjamin Button..making me 51 yrs old now..... ::MonkeyDance::
Don't even think of calling me a stackaholic.... ::MonkeyCool::

Was a great movie.WANTED with Angelina Jolie!No need to turn around.Full steam ahead through the BS.this is about JUSTICE FOR NATALEE... ::MonkeyCool::
KTF...I WANTED with Angelina Jolie 2..Wife said NO...

I wouldn't mess with her you might upset Mr.Smith! ::MonkeyHaHa::
To have time with Angelina And get beat up by Brad....one can only hope... ::MonkeyDance:: ::MonkeyDance::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #797 1/30/09 -
Post by: Anna on February 01, 2009, 02:57:54 AM
Hotshot ATTACKING ANNA
Re: Natalee Case Discussion #791 1/6/09 -
« Reply #715 on: January 08, 2009, 09:13:35 PM »
Anna lied to dave
 and lied about *******
 anna is not so nice either
 she attacked and threatened so many its unreal
 called the fbi on lala cause she talked about lorenzo..lol
 damn straight im defending him
http://scaredmonkeys.net/index.php?topic=4351.msg618883#msg618883



And not one word of that is true.  Debbie at BFN saw the complete headers including embedded codes for reply, etc. as did several others of exchange concerning anything I said I learned from the Office of the Prosecution.

And this FBI whopper was totally new to me, never even saw that one before.

So when I ask if Lala's said this, I get the old run around.

I have never posted one single lie about anything remotely related to Natalee Holloway's disappearance.  Not ever.

I guess liars think everybody lies because they do.



So again, YES or NO?  Who told you I contacted the FBI about Lalas?

Did SHE say that?  I don't think she did.  Sounds MUCH more like something you and your sicko buddy ******* would cook up.

People saw what he did here for himself.  I wasn't the only one he attacked and lied about.  No need to lie about anything.  It is what it is.


YES or NO.  Takes literally seconds to type. 


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #797 1/30/09 -
Post by: Keepthefaith on February 01, 2009, 03:00:03 AM
Great to be back!Movie was fantastic and i see i came at the right time!
KTF..Turn around..Nice to see you're back... ::MonkeyDance::
I'm 99 yrs old, but according to TM...I have 150 yrs to go....so I'm taking the route of Benjamin Button..making me 51 yrs old now..... ::MonkeyDance::
Don't even think of calling me a stackaholic.... ::MonkeyCool::

Was a great movie.WANTED with Angelina Jolie!No need to turn around.Full steam ahead through the BS.this is about JUSTICE FOR NATALEE... ::MonkeyCool::
KTF...I WANTED with Angelina Jolie 2..Wife said NO...

I wouldn't mess with her you might upset Mr.Smith! ::MonkeyHaHa::
To have time with Angelina And get beat up by Brad....one can only hope... ::MonkeyDance:: ::MonkeyDance::

I'll leave that visual alone BILLB!


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #797 1/30/09 -
Post by: texasmom on February 01, 2009, 03:01:27 AM
Hotshot,
Scared Monkeys is not a circus, and despite all the disruptions/attacks on those that have brought information crucial to the case; the pursuit of Justice for Natalee has never stopped.  The name calling and attacks have not only been on Kermit and those that support him.  The attacks (that may not be posted here, but are known about by many here) have also been aimed at Scared Monkeys, the owners, administrators, and mods.  You know that Hotshot, and you know it's not right.  Some of the very ones you have mentioned are some that should be the most grateful for this forum and the opportunity it gave them over the years to express their ideas, share their research and make bonds with others who had the same interests.  Instead they are chatting and grumbling and stirring the pot as much as possible to try to tear this forum apart.  Well it's not happening!  And when the chosen ones come here to disrupt; they will be addressed.  The monkeys are tired of it, and we're standing together.  You can look at the date in my profile and say I'm a fairly new monkey.  Well I'm not.  I was here and a member early on and then locked out after one of the crashes.  I tried and tried to get back in.  Gave up for a while and then started trying again.  I have wanted nothing more than to get Natalee back and have those responsible punished from May 2005.  If you want to gripe about what's different here you need to look in the mirror; and take a look at who your consorting with because that's the problem.  Kyle had his chance to tell us what was going on, he chose the hidey hole.  Caps has done the same.  Don't come over here attacking those who are bringing the truth to light unless you have PROOF of your arguments.  Otherwise you are just considered another disruption! 


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #797 1/30/09 -
Post by: Keepthefaith on February 01, 2009, 03:02:07 AM
22 guests viewing!No need to be scared by Billb and his stackaholism!


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #797 1/30/09 -
Post by: Anna on February 01, 2009, 03:03:25 AM
Hotshot ATTACKING ANNA
Re: Natalee Case Discussion #791 1/6/09 -
« Reply #715 on: January 08, 2009, 09:13:35 PM »
Anna lied to dave
 and lied about *******
 anna is not so nice either
 she attacked and threatened so many its unreal
 called the fbi on lala cause she talked about lorenzo..lol
 damn straight im defending him
http://scaredmonkeys.net/index.php?topic=4351.msg618883#msg618883

Are there pics of hotshot & lorenzo 2??   ::MonkeyDance:: ::MonkeyDance::



He wouldn't be seen with an old woman old enough to be his mother as that is totally age inappropriate. 

I seem to be the only monkey left who doesn't think he is involved in this in any way so I have been accused of BEING his mother, lol.  Agree or get attacked is the motto of some people.

Then they lecture others on how they should behave.

I don't think he is any choir boy but just don't think he has anything to do with this and also don't think von Loon did either.  They were both scubajap red herrings to take heat off of Joran.



Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #797 1/30/09 -
Post by: Keepthefaith on February 01, 2009, 03:05:46 AM
Hotshot,
Scared Monkeys is not a circus, and despite all the disruptions/attacks on those that have brought information crucial to the case; the pursuit of Justice for Natalee has never stopped.  The name calling and attacks have not only been on Kermit and those that support him.  The attacks (that may not be posted here, but are known about by many here) have also been aimed at Scared Monkeys, the owners, administrators, and mods.  You know that Hotshot, and you know it's not right.  Some of the very ones you have mentioned are some that should be the most grateful for this forum and the opportunity it gave them over the years to express their ideas, share their research and make bonds with others who had the same interests.  Instead they are chatting and grumbling and stirring the pot as much as possible to try to tear this forum apart.  Well it's not happening!  And when the chosen ones come here to disrupt; they will be addressed.  The monkeys are tired of it, and we're standing together.  You can look at the date in my profile and say I'm a fairly new monkey.  Well I'm not.  I was here and a member early on and then locked out after one of the crashes.  I tried and tried to get back in.  Gave up for a while and then started trying again.  I have wanted nothing more than to get Natalee back and have those responsible punished from May 2005.  If you want to gripe about what's different here you need to look in the mirror; and take a look at who your consorting with because that's the problem.  Kyle had his chance to tell us what was going on, he chose the hidey hole.  Caps has done the same.  Don't come over here attacking those who are bringing the truth to light unless you have PROOF of your arguments.  Otherwise you are just considered another disruption! 


What the CnG poster's are doing will only strengthen The Monkey's,as well as bring more Monkey's.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #797 1/30/09 -
Post by: hotping on February 01, 2009, 03:07:19 AM
Hotshot,
Scared Monkeys is not a circus, and despite all the disruptions/attacks on those that have brought information crucial to the case; the pursuit of Justice for Natalee has never stopped.  The name calling and attacks have not only been on Kermit and those that support him.  The attacks (that may not be posted here, but are known about by many here) have also been aimed at Scared Monkeys, the owners, administrators, and mods.  You know that Hotshot, and you know it's not right.  Some of the very ones you have mentioned are some that should be the most grateful for this forum and the opportunity it gave them over the years to express their ideas, share their research and make bonds with others who had the same interests.  Instead they are chatting and grumbling and stirring the pot as much as possible to try to tear this forum apart.  Well it's not happening!  And when the chosen ones come here to disrupt; they will be addressed.  The monkeys are tired of it, and we're standing together.  You can look at the date in my profile and say I'm a fairly new monkey.  Well I'm not.  I was here and a member early on and then locked out after one of the crashes.  I tried and tried to get back in.  Gave up for a while and then started trying again.  I have wanted nothing more than to get Natalee back and have those responsible punished from May 2005.  If you want to gripe about what's different here you need to look in the mirror; and take a look at who your consorting with because that's the problem.  Kyle had his chance to tell us what was going on, he chose the hidey hole.  Caps has done the same.  Don't come over here attacking those who are bringing the truth to light unless you have PROOF of your arguments.  Otherwise you are just considered another disruption! 

Excellent!  ::MonkeyCool::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #797 1/30/09 -
Post by: billb's daughter on February 01, 2009, 03:11:02 AM
Hotshot,
Scared Monkeys is not a circus, and despite all the disruptions/attacks on those that have brought information crucial to the case; the pursuit of Justice for Natalee has never stopped.  The name calling and attacks have not only been on Kermit and those that support him.  The attacks (that may not be posted here, but are known about by many here) have also been aimed at Scared Monkeys, the owners, administrators, and mods.  You know that Hotshot, and you know it's not right.  Some of the very ones you have mentioned are some that should be the most grateful for this forum and the opportunity it gave them over the years to express their ideas, share their research and make bonds with others who had the same interests.  Instead they are chatting and grumbling and stirring the pot as much as possible to try to tear this forum apart.  Well it's not happening!  And when the chosen ones come here to disrupt; they will be addressed.  The monkeys are tired of it, and we're standing together.  You can look at the date in my profile and say I'm a fairly new monkey.  Well I'm not.  I was here and a member early on and then locked out after one of the crashes.  I tried and tried to get back in.  Gave up for a while and then started trying again.  I have wanted nothing more than to get Natalee back and have those responsible punished from May 2005.  If you want to gripe about what's different here you need to look in the mirror; and take a look at who your consorting with because that's the problem.  Kyle had his chance to tell us what was going on, he chose the hidey hole.  Caps has done the same.  Don't come over here attacking those who are bringing the truth to light unless you have PROOF of your arguments.  Otherwise you are just considered another disruption! 

Well said TM...
Hotshot...bring proof to back up your position, not attacks against posters...that is only circular BS.. avoiding the issues at hand. I have no doubt that SM will be here as long as it takes to get Justice for Natalee..we will be a united voice with Beth for 40 years if necessary...come back to the light...


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #797 1/30/09 -
Post by: texasmom on February 01, 2009, 03:11:17 AM
Hotshot ATTACKING ANNA
Re: Natalee Case Discussion #791 1/6/09 -
« Reply #715 on: January 08, 2009, 09:13:35 PM »
Anna lied to dave
 and lied about *******
 anna is not so nice either
 she attacked and threatened so many its unreal
 called the fbi on lala cause she talked about lorenzo..lol
 damn straight im defending him
http://scaredmonkeys.net/index.php?topic=4351.msg618883#msg618883

Are there pics of hotshot & lorenzo 2??   ::MonkeyDance:: ::MonkeyDance::

Wouldn't surprise me!   ::MonkeyWink:: ::MonkeyTongue::



Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #797 1/30/09 -
Post by: Anna on February 01, 2009, 03:18:39 AM
Janet and Blue Moon, I was not speaking about you. I guess it was obvious that this was concerning the drive-by attacks on SM posters that may disagree with the chat/grumble/hotshot/whoever else new forum group. I hope you will continue to post and allow for differing opinions that are presented respectfully just as you have for some time now. This isn't my forum nor would I want to impact the normal flow here, I was only sharing feedback which I had heard firsthand.


And I can verify that I have heard the same thing for years concerning these people who make inappropriate contace with this family. 
Imagine if we all did.  Dealing with unstable and unreliable people has to make it worse and yet wanting information they have to try and cope.

And if you were these people, would you want the likes of some to be bugging the life out of you all the time?


They have friends.  They want their child back. 
Did anyone else note that Hotshot posted that Caps gave her Silvetti's phone number?  Hahahahaha!  Now that's one number I am glad that she has.  She can annoy him and leave others alone.



Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #797 1/30/09 -
Post by: Anna on February 01, 2009, 03:21:52 AM
Hotshot ATTACKING ANNA
Re: Natalee Case Discussion #791 1/6/09 -
« Reply #715 on: January 08, 2009, 09:13:35 PM »
Anna lied to dave
 and lied about *******
 anna is not so nice either
 she attacked and threatened so many its unreal
 called the fbi on lala cause she talked about lorenzo..lol
 damn straight im defending him
http://scaredmonkeys.net/index.php?topic=4351.msg618883#msg618883

Are there pics of hotshot & lorenzo 2??   ::MonkeyDance:: ::MonkeyDance::

Wouldn't surprise me!   ::MonkeyWink:: ::MonkeyTongue::




Well, it would me!  That boy was reared better than that!

 ::MonkeyHaHa:: ::MonkeyHaHa:: ::MonkeyHaHa::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #797 1/30/09 -
Post by: Keepthefaith on February 01, 2009, 03:23:16 AM

I find it very telling that they stayed for 4 months and the only human dive was the one done on the cage, which Silvetti & Trehan claim contained nothing.


I have not heard of any action by Beth or Dave (or Jug) to 'fund' the dives for the remaining 100+ 'viable' targets.

I also find that odd.

And I asked this before - but I'll ask again -- how EXACTLY did CAPS know where to dive to find the cage????

In other words -- who gave him the coordinates of the location?? Or was he swimming around in 90' of ocean water and stumbled upon it??

Inquiring minds want to know.


CapsLockWizard
"Another thing , I went to dive a week a go to the same location, and the Cage is still there. If the cage was evidance in a murder case, why is it still in the water."

http://scaredmonkeys.net/index.php?topic=4182.msg564838#msg564838

Of course, this is same post in which Caps said: "on the opening a business in Aruba... no way true. Need an Arubian Partner and the Business law for AVV or ofshore business registered in Aruba is not benefecial." 

And didn't I just see information and links posted in the last day or two that proved that to be untrue?  Is it possible he doesn't dive at all and was just making it up?  Of course, it's possible...
 :smt102



BUMP


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #797 1/30/09 -
Post by: Keepthefaith on February 01, 2009, 03:24:59 AM
REE

"VMS, I speak for only myself, but I personally don't care what Kermit's occupation is.  IMO the emails she posted speak for themselves.  I have no problem with any of the emails posted, but I do take issue with the crap SS posted yesterday."

KERMIT

"Just so everyone here knows I am well aware of them giving that information over to Aruba too."   


KEEPTHEFAITH
I thought this was important to bring over in case you don't read the previous thread!




BUMP


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #797 1/30/09 -
Post by: Anna on February 01, 2009, 03:25:31 AM
Just kidding!


But yes, the attacks will only make monkeys stronger and more united.
There is no way this forum is going to go away.  They CAN'T destroy it because we are stronger than they are.

And the Caylee Thread is massive and likely more than enough to justify keeping the forum going.

So we will just stay the course and hold fact in our quest for justice for Natalee.



Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #797 1/30/09 -
Post by: texasmom on February 01, 2009, 03:25:51 AM

Thanks KTF, Hotping and billb.  I agree with your comments too.  

And Anna deserves an answer to her question.  I can say that I'd heard the lie before (among many) and it didn't come from Hotshot or Lala's.  I don't know if Lala's told the person that told me or not.  But I'm sure Hotshot does.  She brought it over here, she needs to answer the question.



Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #797 1/30/09 -
Post by: Keepthefaith on February 01, 2009, 03:26:01 AM
If ... as Lou contends .. Jug Twitty continues to upholds the Persistence undertaking ... then I do not believe for one minute that Natalee's stepfather has received a full compilation of Kyle Kingsman's own words ... Kyle Kingsman's own words that expose the betrayal of John Silvetti ... the betrayal that implies the opportunity to bring his stepdaughter home to rest on American soil may have been lost forever.

Maybe the timing is right for Jug Twitty to be made aware.

Janet

+++++

'Scarborough Country' for July 14
updated 8:45 a.m. PT, Fri., July. 15, 2005


JUG TWITTY, NATALEE HOLLOWAY'S STEPFATHER: Beth and I have been through this emotional roller coaster. And all we want is Natalee, whether she's alive or dead. We want to bring her back to the United States, and we'll leave and they can do whatever they want to do.

http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/8551824/


'The Abrams Report' for July 1
updated 7:47 a.m. PT, Wed., July. 6, 2005


BETH HOLLOWAY TWITTY, NATALEE HOLLOWAY'S MOTHER:  We cannot forget to demand and expect to have Natalee.  Natalee deserves to return to her country.  She deserves it, and everyone knows it, Martin, every single person.  Every single person knows that.  They know it.

http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/8485029/

BUMP


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #797 1/30/09 -
Post by: Anna on February 01, 2009, 03:29:56 AM

I find it very telling that they stayed for 4 months and the only human dive was the one done on the cage, which Silvetti & Trehan claim contained nothing.


I have not heard of any action by Beth or Dave (or Jug) to 'fund' the dives for the remaining 100+ 'viable' targets.

I also find that odd.

And I asked this before - but I'll ask again -- how EXACTLY did CAPS know where to dive to find the cage????

In other words -- who gave him the coordinates of the location?? Or was he swimming around in 90' of ocean water and stumbled upon it??

Inquiring minds want to know.


CapsLockWizard
"Another thing , I went to dive a week a go to the same location, and the Cage is still there. If the cage was evidance in a murder case, why is it still in the water."

http://scaredmonkeys.net/index.php?topic=4182.msg564838#msg564838

Of course, this is same post in which Caps said: "on the opening a business in Aruba... no way true. Need an Arubian Partner and the Business law for AVV or ofshore business registered in Aruba is not benefecial." 

And didn't I just see information and links posted in the last day or two that proved that to be untrue?  Is it possible he doesn't dive at all and was just making it up?  Of course, it's possible...
 :smt102



BUMP


Caps make something up?  You mean like the initials are reversed on people arrested?  All Dave has to do is fly down and claim the body?  DIfferent theory every day?

Nnaaaawwwwwwwww. . . . .no way.

 ::MonkeyTongue:: ::MonkeyHaHa:: ::MonkeyTongue::

What part didn't he make up?


.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #797 1/30/09 -
Post by: hotping on February 01, 2009, 03:32:56 AM
Just kidding!


But yes, the attacks will only make monkeys stronger and more united.
There is no way this forum is going to go away.  They CAN'T destroy it because we are stronger than they are.

And the Caylee Thread is massive and likely more than enough to justify keeping the forum going.

So we will just stay the course and hold fact in our quest for justice for Natalee.


I Agree Anna...And I Also Agree that Hotsit (Not) needs to answer Your question but She won't cause She's CS! 


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #797 1/30/09 -
Post by: Keepthefaith on February 01, 2009, 03:33:45 AM
Well.It looks like the CnG crowd left from Lurking!went from about 20 to 8 in about 3 minutes....JMOO


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #797 1/30/09 -
Post by: hotping on February 01, 2009, 03:35:13 AM
Well.It looks like the CnG crowd left from Lurking!went from about 20 to 8 in about 3 minutes....JMOO
Yep!  ::MonkeyWink::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #797 1/30/09 -
Post by: Anna on February 01, 2009, 03:35:18 AM

Thanks KTF, Hotping and billb.  I agree with your comments too.  

And Anna deserves an answer to her question.  I can say that I'd heard the lie before (among many) and it didn't come from Hotshot or Lala's.  I don't know if Lala's told the person that told me or not.  But I'm sure Hotshot does.  She brought it over here, she needs to answer the question.




Well, Lala's and I share the same FBI Offices and that is something I can easily verify one way or the other.

But something tells me that Lala's is not the source for that.  I have been shocked at some people before but I don't think she would lie that way.

I know others whom I think would.

All Hotshot has to do is type yes or no.  I doubt anybody is going to die if she does that.  Maybe some of the time devoted to annoying phone calls could be used to respond to her own viciousness.



Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #797 1/30/09 -
Post by: hotping on February 01, 2009, 03:39:53 AM
Well...I've had all of the excitement that I can stand for one day...

Good Night All!

Justice For Natalee!

I Stand with The Girl!


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #797 1/30/09 -
Post by: Keepthefaith on February 01, 2009, 03:41:16 AM
Well...I've had all of the excitement that I can stand for one day...

Good Night All!

Justice For Natalee!

I Stand with The Girl!

GoodNight HotPing!God Bless you!


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #797 1/30/09 -
Post by: texasmom on February 01, 2009, 03:41:53 AM
Well...I've had all of the excitement that I can stand for one day...

Good Night All!

Justice For Natalee!

I Stand with The Girl!

Goodnight Hotping!   ::MonkeyCool::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #797 1/30/09 -
Post by: Anna on February 01, 2009, 03:43:19 AM
Once before the same people made up lies about me trying to get somebody fired.  This is something else I have never done in my life and don't have the inclination nor energy.

And I think it was FRANK of all people.  I like FRANK and would never have even thought of doing such a thing!  Not even if I didn't like him which I do.  I have no idea and don't want to know or care even where he works.

They will just make up some lie they think will cause others not to like you and spread it about in their little hidey holes.

You know how that works.  But they do it because they don't like what a person posts or don't agree with the content of posts which is a despicable thing to do.

I much prefer to just state what I think and why and end of it.

Oh, and BTW, I did once try to discuss a difference of opinion with one of those and all I got was PM's filled with the F bomb and calling me obscenities.  So there is no chance for any rational exchange of ideas.



Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #797 1/30/09 -
Post by: billb's daughter on February 01, 2009, 03:43:58 AM

I find it very telling that they stayed for 4 months and the only human dive was the one done on the cage, which Silvetti & Trehan claim contained nothing.


I have not heard of any action by Beth or Dave (or Jug) to 'fund' the dives for the remaining 100+ 'viable' targets.

I also find that odd.

And I asked this before - but I'll ask again -- how EXACTLY did CAPS know where to dive to find the cage????

In other words -- who gave him the coordinates of the location?? Or was he swimming around in 90' of ocean water and stumbled upon it??

Inquiring minds want to know.


CapsLockWizard
"Another thing , I went to dive a week a go to the same location, and the Cage is still there. If the cage was evidance in a murder case, why is it still in the water."

http://scaredmonkeys.net/index.php?topic=4182.msg564838#msg564838

Of course, this is same post in which Caps said: "on the opening a business in Aruba... no way true. Need an Arubian Partner and the Business law for AVV or ofshore business registered in Aruba is not benefecial." 

And didn't I just see information and links posted in the last day or two that proved that to be untrue?  Is it possible he doesn't dive at all and was just making it up?  Of course, it's possible...
 :smt102



BUMP


Caps make something up?  You mean like the initials are reversed on people arrested?  All Dave has to do is fly down and claim the body?  DIfferent theory every day?

Nnaaaawwwwwwwww. . . . .no way.

 ::MonkeyTongue:: ::MonkeyHaHa:: ::MonkeyTongue::

What part didn't he make up?


.
You know..I wanted to believe that CAPS had answers to Natalee's faith orchestrated by the elders/pimps that fateful night, and that Kermit had the "what became of her final resting place:..
Based on my current view..Caps was all bs....the C&G grp are all bs..Kermit/Freebirds are right on the money...persistence/louis/john/tim the diver/kyle are ALL American traitors...
The pimps/elders decided Natalee's fate..PREMEDITATED MURDER...may they all rot in HELL...
I HATE THEM ALL...


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #797 1/30/09 -
Post by: wreck on February 01, 2009, 03:48:12 AM

I find it very telling that they stayed for 4 months and the only human dive was the one done on the cage, which Silvetti & Trehan claim contained nothing.


I have not heard of any action by Beth or Dave (or Jug) to 'fund' the dives for the remaining 100+ 'viable' targets.

I also find that odd.

And I asked this before - but I'll ask again -- how EXACTLY did CAPS know where to dive to find the cage????

In other words -- who gave him the coordinates of the location?? Or was he swimming around in 90' of ocean water and stumbled upon it??

Inquiring minds want to know.


CapsLockWizard
"Another thing , I went to dive a week a go to the same location, and the Cage is still there. If the cage was evidance in a murder case, why is it still in the water."

http://scaredmonkeys.net/index.php?topic=4182.msg564838#msg564838

Of course, this is same post in which Caps said: "on the opening a business in Aruba... no way true. Need an Arubian Partner and the Business law for AVV or ofshore business registered in Aruba is not benefecial." 

And didn't I just see information and links posted in the last day or two that proved that to be untrue?  Is it possible he doesn't dive at all and was just making it up?  Of course, it's possible...
 :smt102



BUMP


Caps make something up?  You mean like the initials are reversed on people arrested?  All Dave has to do is fly down and claim the body?  DIfferent theory every day?

Nnaaaawwwwwwwww. . . . .no way.

 ::MonkeyTongue:: ::MonkeyHaHa:: ::MonkeyTongue::

What part didn't he make up?


.
You know..I wanted to believe that CAPS had answers to Natalee's faith orchestrated by the elders/pimps that fateful night, and that Kermit had the "what became of her final resting place:..
Based on my current view..Caps was all bs....the C&G grp are all bs..Kermit/Freebirds are right on the money...persistence/louis/john/tim the diver/kyle are ALL American traitors...
The pimps/elders decided Natalee's fate..PREMEDITATED MURDER...may they all rot in HELL...
I HATE THEM ALL...
I promised I would come back and "mop up" ------ no need, you did fine monkeys!!  All they have done is re-energized us!!!


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #797 1/30/09 -
Post by: Keepthefaith on February 01, 2009, 03:51:29 AM
Once before the same people made up lies about me trying to get somebody fired.  This is something else I have never done in my life and don't have the inclination nor energy.

And I think it was FRANK of all people.  I like FRANK and would never have even thought of doing such a thing!  Not even if I didn't like him which I do.  I have no idea and don't want to know or care even where he works.

They will just make up some lie they think will cause others not to like you and spread it about in their little hidey holes.

You know how that works.  But they do it because they don't like what a person posts or don't agree with the content of posts which is a despicable thing to do.

I much prefer to just state what I think and why and end of it.

Oh, and BTW, I did once try to discuss a difference of opinion with one of those and all I got was PM's filled with the F bomb and calling me obscenities.  So there is no chance for any rational exchange of ideas.



As i sit here and contemplate that the Holloway's have had to deal with the passing of their daughter and trying to sift throught the bullsh_t that is Aruba and they also have to deal with many who've crossed boundaries no normal person would cross.If you have information regarding anything Natalee Holloway it should go to the FBI,and or their attorney's.You should never contact the family.If you have.How unfeeling,uncaring,and downright rude you are.I have NO respect whatsoever for those that continue to perpetuate the distraction on this forum concerning the JUSTICE FOR NATALEE HOLLOWAY.....


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #797 1/30/09 -
Post by: Anna on February 01, 2009, 03:53:00 AM
I would do anything to help Beth, anything humanly possible.  I want justice for her for her child soooooo badly it hurts.

But it stops short of doing nonsensical things that don't really help at all and are just a burden to an already tortured family.  It is better to only offer my prayers and support than to do anything that would make matters worse.  Sometimes that is all we can do.

Doing things just to be doing them and to insert yourself into this for the drama or "glory" as Hotshot said today is just plain wrong.

And if people are going to lie, it might be a bit smarter not to lie about somebody who lives as close to me as Lala's does because we might just figure it out.  Alabama is a small place in population and everybody knows somebody who knows somebody, etc.

Right now my only hope is the tapes Greta has have enough to tie Paulus to the disposal and he brings van der Straten down with him.  Since the Persistence gave the contents of the trap totally to ALE, I guess that hope is lost forever.



Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #797 1/30/09 -
Post by: Keepthefaith on February 01, 2009, 03:53:06 AM
It defy's logic what these poster's are doing.These people are SICK,SICK,SICK. ::MonkeyNoNo::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #797 1/30/09 -
Post by: Anna on February 01, 2009, 03:59:40 AM
I promised I would come back and "mop up" ------ no need, you did fine monkeys!!  All they have done is re-energized us!!!


Well, you should have been here Wreck.  It was more of the same old same old so you really didn't miss anything.

But you are correct.  Boundaries have been crossed and I personally am now angry. 

Energized is one way to look at it in a positive light.

We will come out of this more united in our determination to have justice for Natalee.

It's about HER and not these drama queens who try to satisfy some need or other in themselves by their actions.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #797 1/30/09 -
Post by: Keepthefaith on February 01, 2009, 04:01:06 AM
GoodNight to all Monkey's...........

JUSTICE FOR NATALEE HOLLOWAY           JUSTICE FOR NATALEE HOLLOWAY
                             JUSTICE FOR NATALEE HOLLOWAY         
JUSTICE FOR NATALEE HOLLOWAY           JUSTICE FOR NATALEE HOLLOWAY
                             JUSTICE FOR NATALEE HOLLOWAY
JUSTICE FOR NATALEE HOLLOWAY           JUSTICE FOR NATALEE HOLLOWAY
                             JUSTICE FOR NATALEE HOLLOWAY


                           GOD BLESS BETH,DAVE,JUG,AND ROBIN


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #797 1/30/09 -
Post by: billb's daughter on February 01, 2009, 04:02:59 AM
I promised I would come back and "mop up" ------ no need, you did fine monkeys!!  All they have done is re-energized us!!!
[/quote]
wreck...If I had the means/authority...I would commission a spec ops unit to interrogate/get the truth..i'd start with paulass...anita...renho..jan vs/dennis jacob....particular take time with karen jansen..dumpig..richardson...make mos squeal like a piggy...witt..king....and for fun..urine...depak..satish...PM...rudy...
waterboarding would be my pleasure...not that I'm a violent person.....


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #797 1/30/09 -
Post by: texasmom on February 01, 2009, 04:04:10 AM
GoodNight to all Monkey's...........

JUSTICE FOR NATALEE HOLLOWAY           JUSTICE FOR NATALEE HOLLOWAY
                             JUSTICE FOR NATALEE HOLLOWAY         
JUSTICE FOR NATALEE HOLLOWAY           JUSTICE FOR NATALEE HOLLOWAY
                             JUSTICE FOR NATALEE HOLLOWAY
JUSTICE FOR NATALEE HOLLOWAY           JUSTICE FOR NATALEE HOLLOWAY
                             JUSTICE FOR NATALEE HOLLOWAY


                           GOD BLESS BETH,DAVE,JUG,AND ROBIN

Goodnight KTF!   ::MonkeyCool::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #797 1/30/09 -
Post by: Anna on February 01, 2009, 04:07:22 AM
I have become a movie addict since I received subscription to Netflix for Christmas.  My sleep is suffering greatly, lol.

So am calling it a night.  Saving Gone Baby Gone for tomorrow. 

Would like to discuss that article Klaas posted by Paul Roberts.

It said it was Part I so that would indicate there is more to come.  So far, I like what he has had to say.

G'nite, all!


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #797 1/30/09 -
Post by: texasmom on February 01, 2009, 04:11:05 AM


Goodnight Anna!   ::MonkeyCool::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #797 1/30/09 -
Post by: texasmom on February 01, 2009, 04:12:42 AM
(http://i21.photobucket.com/albums/b258/texasmom55/Natalee/Natalee_Grad00o9.jpg)

TRUTH & JUSTICE FOR NATALEE!!!!


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #797 1/30/09 -
Post by: texasmom on February 01, 2009, 04:13:29 AM



Goodnight everyone!   ::MonkeyCool::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #797 1/30/09 -
Post by: sharon on February 01, 2009, 07:26:09 AM
REMINDER - Whether we agree or disagree with LDSTLOU's opinion regarding Kyle and Kermit, LDSTLOU is spending her day today at the travel show in St. Louis reminding people that Aruba is not a safe destination  


Something HotShots and ******* have both participated in as well. 

I don't see this as some sort of license to attack other posters, however.



Anna  - I agree.  I just wanted to remind people in case they didn't know.  I feel she's being misguided.

Intersting onservation, klaas.

I would point out that the same assessment (substitute he for she) has been made about Joran Vandersloot?

 ::MonkeyNoNo:: ::MonkeyNoNo::







Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #797 1/30/09 -
Post by: sharon on February 01, 2009, 07:40:09 AM
These are the perpetrators in this case:

(http://i272.photobucket.com/albums/jj176/bastibro/Kalpoe/FFFFFFFFFFFF.jpg)

Caps, OE and even Kermit were/are just trying to get to the truth.
The problem is that some people having difficulties to stay humble and that they enjoy the fact that some people make them to important, unfortunately(and i exclude Kyle here) ::MonkeyWink::



1.Kermit-posted nothing but the truth backed up by the Freebirds,as well as Kyle!
2.Kyle-Potentially an accessory to obstruction of justice.Backed up by his own words,as well as actions.
3.CapsLockWizard-Has posted many false statements regarding this case!

And you call Kermit the fraud! ::MonkeyLaugh::

Kyle`s own words were ripped off their context by her. That`s my answer to you and to Janet.

sincerely, Bastian.

(http://i272.photobucket.com/albums/jj176/bastibro/Natalee/2fp29beth2.jpg)

I don't know you, so I'm not 'too' offended that you are insuating that I am a liar  ::MonkeyWink::


There is no other 'context' for Kyle's words.

There is no other 'context' for Kyle's words.

There is no other 'context' for Kyle's words.

There is no other 'context' for Kyle's words.

There is no other 'context' for Kyle's words.

There is no other 'context' for Kyle's words.





Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #797 1/30/09 -
Post by: Nut44x4 on February 01, 2009, 07:41:29 AM
(http://i25.photobucket.com/albums/c100/crazybabyborgs/MOD/modlock4.gif)


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #797 1/30/09 -
Post by: sharon on February 01, 2009, 07:50:08 AM
Goodnight (http://bestsmileys.com/peace/1.gif)


lol

That's the very first avi I used here, nut  ::MonkeyDance::



Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #797 1/30/09 -
Post by: San on February 01, 2009, 09:03:30 AM
How's your day Kermit?  Don't think anyone wants to talk face to face with you today.

Hotshot probably ran off to get her poop suit.


I ran off to go do CPR on a woman who is now dead.  Have some freakin manners will you.  Theatrics is not my style, if it were I'd be on here all day... Anna, sorry I didn't have time to answer you, I was a bit busy the last few hours...  But forget it now.  And if Lalas contacted Dave so be it, I also did just to set the record straight.  KMA also Hotping. 

I am sick and tired of hearing your "Theatrics".  I don't want to hear where you ran off to and who you had to do CPR on.  What you do for a living is your business not mine or SM's.  Does this mean you are doing your drive byes while you are working?  Do me a favor and stay off the freaking computer while you are working because obviously your mind isn't on the job because you're worried about making post to someone so you could bash them.

And for the record I knew you were going to come on about 10:30 last night but I was off by 45 minutes.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #797 1/30/09 -
Post by: San on February 01, 2009, 09:06:18 AM
Hotshot....do you know about HIPAA Laws...?  I think that first sentence about the patient should be deleted.  I am not sure but it seems that it would be a good idea never to mention specifics with patients in the work that you do.....Mere
Mere, I am an EMT, and yes I know my HIPAA Laws.  The fact that a name, birthdate, town or lisence wasnt given means I did not break the law.  Do you know them?
Truthseeker, Thanks is not easy... I knew the family personally.


Yes she does know them and her first concern is always the patient.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #797 1/30/09 -
Post by: San on February 01, 2009, 09:24:02 AM
Hotshot....do you know about HIPAA Laws...?  I think that first sentence about the patient should be deleted.  I am not sure but it seems that it would be a good idea never to mention specifics with patients in the work that you do.....Mere
Mere, I am an EMT, and yes I know my HIPAA Laws.  The fact that a name, birthdate, town or lisence wasnt given means I did not break the law.  Do you know them?

Truthseeker, Thanks is not easy... I knew the family personally.
Hotshot...I get that you had a rough time..knowing the family under the conditions is tough. My prayers go out to you and the family...
But please take a moment when you can....and recognize that it is about Justice for Natalee...not your drama...that brings us here to SM....
So...bring proof/backup to your attacks against Kermit/Freebirds and proof/backup supporting kyle..CAPS...or drop it (goes to my comment about circular BS).
I do recognize that you go to Aruba marketing events in the US to protest...but it is beyond my ability to process logically how on the one hand...you can do that; and on the other..attack the messenger (Kermit?Freebirds) when they are only EXPOSING kyle's OWN words....

They all asked where I went, so I told them.  It's not about my drama, just explaining where I went to.  I do go to the events yes, and I am not attacking Kermit for what she thinks happened.  I am atacking because she is not telling all.  Kyle went to them to share his adventure, and ask what he should do.  He went to them in confidence.  Not to be posted all over the internet, and ruin his chances for future jobs in his proffession.  His own words WERE taken out of context, and yes there was an FBI guy he was working with.  He has been taken off the case, and he was as corrupt as the Arubans.  As far as the family goes, I know Dave is hating what is going on also.  Its not just the attacks its the whole thing.  SM is not SM anymore.  its a circus with name calling and such.  We ALL are seeking justice, in differnet ways, and they know that.  They really do know that.  They knew what I was doing before I did it.  They know most of all we talk about.  For you certain people who dont respect me anymore is fine.  I did what I did with the OK of family.  I sent them all I knew, and all I thought was of good concern.  Dave didnt give anyone his number, he just unplugged the phone.  He still has cells, and other ways to talk with him, as HE told me.  I have talked with him and he is sick.  Cant you guys just get to a normal way of being the way you were just for the sake of the family, without bashing everyone who has a different view?

1. It's all about drama with you and where you could insert yourself.

2. You are constantly attacking.

3. So Kyle went to a bunch of internet posters to ask for advice rather than going to his own family or a lawyer.  How stupid is he.

4. So what you are saying is that not only is the Aruban ALE corrupt so is our FBI.

5. Yes we all are seeking justice and when it doesn't fit your way you attack.

6. So Dave didn't change his number like you said he only unplugged it  ::MonkeyConfused::  Did you finally get the hint.

7. We are our normal way.  You are the one bashing and causing all this trouble.


Bottom line you decided you were going to play hero and protect Kyle and CAPS.  When the some of us asked questions because of what Kermit posted it didn't fit your plan and that's when the bashing started.

Respect is earned.  You have not earned one ounce of respect.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #797 1/30/09 -
Post by: Buckeye on February 01, 2009, 09:55:58 AM
Hotshot posted:

You know, whats on the internet is for public use, we have all said that many times.  So, why is it a big deal that things are taken over to other places?   We are all doing the same thing, and that is investigating the disappearance of Natalee Holloway.  It's just that this group likes who they share with, and that group likes who they share with.  It seems to keep the bickering out of all of it, and thats how it should be.  I don't see you picking on the Goldmonkeys, or BFN, or any of the others out there.  Freebirds are here now, because there is no where else to go.  Either they were kicked outta the Freebirds, OR they have given up and want to take some glory.  Fine, they were good people till all of this.  Lots of respect has been lost due to all that has been said here. 


Please tell Kyle and Caps that their posts have been brought over.  They can openly be discussed.  We don't care how the posts got here or who was involved in the posting.

SM has always taken pride in linking or backing up the source for information.  The reason there is turmoil now, is because some are more interested in attacking who brought the information, not the information itself. SM has NEVER been supportive of that approach. I don't expect SM posters to back away from an attack especially when it is blatantly obvious ( a post to lstlou answered by someone else starting a sentence with "we") that a group has taken issue with SM.

"Hidey holes" and secret partnerships get breached, all the time.  Live with it.  If you want to post here, please try to discus the information and not who posted it.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #797 1/30/09 -
Post by: Hotshot on February 01, 2009, 10:08:01 AM

Thanks KTF, Hotping and billb.  I agree with your comments too.  

And Anna deserves an answer to her question.  I can say that I'd heard the lie before (among many) and it didn't come from Hotshot or Lala's.  I don't know if Lala's told the person that told me or not.  But I'm sure Hotshot does.  She brought it over here, she needs to answer the question.




Well, Lala's and I share the same FBI Offices and that is something I can easily verify one way or the other.

But something tells me that Lala's is not the source for that.  I have been shocked at some people before but I don't think she would lie that way.

I know others whom I think would.

All Hotshot has to do is type yes or no.  I doubt anybody is going to die if she does that.  Maybe some of the time devoted to annoying phone calls could be used to respond to her own viciousness.


NO


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #797 1/30/09 -
Post by: San on February 01, 2009, 10:24:40 AM

Thanks KTF, Hotping and billb.  I agree with your comments too.  

And Anna deserves an answer to her question.  I can say that I'd heard the lie before (among many) and it didn't come from Hotshot or Lala's.  I don't know if Lala's told the person that told me or not.  But I'm sure Hotshot does.  She brought it over here, she needs to answer the question.




Well, Lala's and I share the same FBI Offices and that is something I can easily verify one way or the other.

But something tells me that Lala's is not the source for that.  I have been shocked at some people before but I don't think she would lie that way.

I know others whom I think would.

All Hotshot has to do is type yes or no.  I doubt anybody is going to die if she does that.  Maybe some of the time devoted to annoying phone calls could be used to respond to her own viciousness.


NO

Just so everyone remembers Anna's question here it is:

Did Lala's tell you I reported her to the FBI or filed a complaint with them about her as you posted here that I did.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #797 1/30/09 -
Post by: Buckeye on February 01, 2009, 10:29:07 AM
For Anna:

I read article 2 and 3 of Paul Roberts (a paranormal?).  Not much there, but I did like his conclusion:

CONCLUSION:
With the many witnesses that claim to have seen or heard about the blonde phantom woman of the Aruba beaches, I do believe they are seeing something that may be paranormal. With the two EVPs that I received, there is a strong indication that there is paranormal activity. I gathered no positive proof that the EVPs are from Natalee Holloway, nor did I ever see a blonde phantom woman on the beaches of Aruba. Many people believe Joran spiked Natalee's drinks with drugs. Many people believe that Joran's father took Natalee on his boat and dumped her body in the ocean. One person I interviewed that calls herself Sasha, says he received this information from the circle of friends that were associated with Joran. My thoughts, when rumors are this strong, there appears there may be some type of foundation of truth and this matter should continue being investigated by the police. As long as Natalee's death is not confirmed, Aruba cannot truly be 'one happy island'. There must be a conclusion to this and justice must be served! Natalee will always be in the hearts of millions. She is an innocent girl that confronted evil and paid a terrible price. God bless Natalee.


http://www.sacramentopress.com/headline/2603/HPI_in_Aruba_In_Search_of_Natalee_Holloway_Part_3


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #797 1/30/09 -
Post by: Buckeye on February 01, 2009, 10:33:27 AM

Thanks KTF, Hotping and billb.  I agree with your comments too. 

And Anna deserves an answer to her question.  I can say that I'd heard the lie before (among many) and it didn't come from Hotshot or Lala's.  I don't know if Lala's told the person that told me or not.  But I'm sure Hotshot does.  She brought it over here, she needs to answer the question.




Well, Lala's and I share the same FBI Offices and that is something I can easily verify one way or the other.

But something tells me that Lala's is not the source for that.  I have been shocked at some people before but I don't think she would lie that way.

I know others whom I think would.

All Hotshot has to do is type yes or no.  I doubt anybody is going to die if she does that.  Maybe some of the time devoted to annoying phone calls could be used to respond to her own viciousness.


NO

Just so everyone remembers Anna's question here it is:

Did Lala's tell you I reported her to the FBI or filed a complaint with them about her as you posted here that I did.

San

I'm sorry.  Was this in reference to  this Hotshot post?

Anna lied to dave
 and lied about *******
 anna is not so nice either
 she attacked and threatened so many its unreal
 called the fbi on lala cause she talked about lorenzo..lol
 damn straight im defending him


http://scaredmonkeys.net/index.php?topic=4351.msg618883#msg618883

Just trying to keep things straight.   ::MonkeyNoNo::



Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #797 1/30/09 -
Post by: San on February 01, 2009, 10:54:19 AM

Thanks KTF, Hotping and billb.  I agree with your comments too. 

And Anna deserves an answer to her question.  I can say that I'd heard the lie before (among many) and it didn't come from Hotshot or Lala's.  I don't know if Lala's told the person that told me or not.  But I'm sure Hotshot does.  She brought it over here, she needs to answer the question.




Well, Lala's and I share the same FBI Offices and that is something I can easily verify one way or the other.

But something tells me that Lala's is not the source for that.  I have been shocked at some people before but I don't think she would lie that way.

I know others whom I think would.

All Hotshot has to do is type yes or no.  I doubt anybody is going to die if she does that.  Maybe some of the time devoted to annoying phone calls could be used to respond to her own viciousness.


NO

Just so everyone remembers Anna's question here it is:

Did Lala's tell you I reported her to the FBI or filed a complaint with them about her as you posted here that I did.

San

I'm sorry.  Was this in reference to  this Hotshot post?

Anna lied to dave
 and lied about *******
 anna is not so nice either
 she attacked and threatened so many its unreal
 called the fbi on lala cause she talked about lorenzo..lol
 damn straight im defending him


http://scaredmonkeys.net/index.php?topic=4351.msg618883#msg618883

Just trying to keep things straight.   ::MonkeyNoNo::



Buckeye there were so many things said.  I thought this was the post she was referring to regarding a Yes or No answer.

http://scaredmonkeys.net/index.php?topic=4460.msg654790#msg654790


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #797 1/30/09 -
Post by: Buckeye on February 01, 2009, 11:17:37 AM
Thanks San.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #797 1/30/09 -
Post by: Tamikosmom on February 01, 2009, 11:18:44 AM

They all asked where I went, so I told them.  It's not about my drama, just explaining where I went to.  I do go to the events yes, and I am not attacking Kermit for what she thinks happened.  I am atacking because she is not telling all.  Kyle went to them to share his adventure, and ask what he should do.  He went to them in confidence.  Not to be posted all over the internet, and ruin his chances for future jobs in his proffession.  His own words WERE taken out of context, and yes there was an FBI guy he was working with.  He has been taken off the case, and he was as corrupt as the Arubans.  As far as the family goes, I know Dave is hating what is going on also.  Its not just the attacks its the whole thing.  SM is not SM anymore.  its a circus with name calling and such.  We ALL are seeking justice, in differnet ways, and they know that.  They really do know that.  They knew what I was doing before I did it.  They know most of all we talk about.  For you certain people who dont respect me anymore is fine.  I did what I did with the OK of family.  I sent them all I knew, and all I thought was of good concern.  Dave didnt give anyone his number, he just unplugged the phone.  He still has cells, and other ways to talk with him, as HE told me.  I have talked with him and he is sick.  Cant you guys just get to a normal way of being the way you were just for the sake of the family, without bashing everyone who has a different view?

Hotshot

Do you not read.  Do you not comprehend.

Why are you not directing your anger at Kyle Kingman rather than the messenger?  It was Kyle Kingman who failed to report his observations regarding the events encompassing the recovery of the contents of the trap/cage to the FBI.

The Natalee's Freebirds are all about exposing the corrupt Aruban investigation.  Do you that that this group of dedicated researchers would have gone along with confidentiality agreement it they thought for one minute that Kyle Kingman was not going to to what he initially stated he was going to do ... share all with the FBI ... share all with Beth Holloway ... expose the finale' to the great Aruban cover up.

Somewhere along the way ... Kyle Kingman had a change of heart.  His own self-interest became what it was all about ... not exposing John Silvetti's betrayal to the family of Natalee Holloway.

Hotshot ... which words of jen ... Former Administrator of the Natalee's Freebirds' Site ... do you not understand.

Janet

++++++


klassend
Re: Natalee Case Discussion #787 12/24/08 -
« Reply #411 on: December 30, 2008, 06:53:44 PM »

Sent to me by Natalee's Freebirds:


Please feel free (if you'd like) to post this at your board.
 
During the journey of the Persistence to Aruba, Kyle reached out and emailed with us.  During that time, one of the questions posed to him was regarding protocol if/when Natalee's remains were found.
 
Kyle's response was that he was unsure, but felt that would be settled before the search began.
 
The cautions were given to him about the lack of integrity on the part of Aruba's law enforcement, prosecutor's office, and its judiciary.
 
Contact with Kyle continued throughout the duration of the search by the Persistence.
 
Once back home, Kyle asked us for our help.  He was very concerned about the activities that transpired during their search - specifically surrounding the find of the fishing cage and its contents.  Kyle wanted our help in presenting this information in a factual way, to then be given to Natalee's family. 
 
This was March 18, 2008.  At that time, Kyle assured us he had just recently sent the images from the Dec 30th and Jan 7th dives to the FBI, but had never received a response from them.
 
We later found that to be false.
 
Also at that time, Beth's brother saw the images Kyle had shared with us - but none of the detail he shared later.

We compiled the images Kyle presented us, along with his opinions and the facts surrounding the sequence of events regarding that fishing cage.  Kyle stated he would be getting in touch with Beth Holloway.
 
We later found out that never happened.

At this time, Kyle shared with us the broadcast networks he had approached in February, in an attempt to sell these images to the highest bidder.
 
This didn't concern us greatly at that time - as we were under the impression US law enforcement and Natalee's family had already been made aware of their find.
 
Approximately May 2008 Kyle began dodging questions for details (we had asked for names of Aruban police and divers to be included in our documentation of these events), hedging on moving forward with this, and then he completely disappeared from our board.
 
During that time, we learned Kyle had never contacted Beth, or Dave, or the FBI with this information.
 
We put our original plan into motion - that of presenting this information in a clear and concise manner, and we sent it to Beth Holloway.
 
Beth was disturbed, needed time to digest the information, and wanted to share it with someone she trusts.
 
When Tim Miller was returning to Aruba this past fall, Beth gave us permission to release this information publicly.
 
At that point, we gave it to John Kelly, Carmen Adams with the FBI, and got it ready for public consumption.
 
The next step was to publish this information at our blog.
 
One of our members felt we were betraying Kyle in doing so, contacted him, and he re-surfaced at our site with threats of litigation against us - stating this was his "intellectual property" and we could not use it.
 
That of course concerned us greatly - as none of us could afford to be sued.
 
He also stated at that time, Luis Shaefer had just recently sold the rights of the video of these images to a broadcast company for the purposes of a documentary.
 
We contacted legal counsel and were advised to keep our distance from any Persistence crew member, in the face of potential obstruction/accessory charges.
 
At this point, one of our members decided to brace for the possibility of civil litigation, resigned from our membership to protect it from same, and posted what he knows to be factual at SM.
 
Kyle did tell us human remains were found in that fish cage.
 
Kyle did tell us about John Silvetti's intent to open an office on the island of Aruba, to enable him ease in conducting business in South America, and Aruba.
 
Kyle also told us of John's absolute refusal to give that fish cage and its contents any credence - before even it was inspected on Jan 7th.
 
Kyle told us in no uncertain terms that Tim Miller and Dateline were abruptly removed from the Persistence on Dec 30, resulting in only Persistence crew being aboard between that date and the Jan 7 dive of the Arubans.
 
Nothing that was posted at SM by kermit was incorrect, out of context, or in any way false.
 
Regards,
 
Former Natalee's Freebirds Administrator

Natalee and her family deserve justice - and we will not let up until they have it!

http://scaredmonkeys.net/index.php?topic=4269.msg603349#msg603349




Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #797 1/30/09 -
Post by: Nut44x4 on February 01, 2009, 11:23:48 AM
I may not be around for the lock today. Depends on how much goes on in here ;) lol


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #797 1/30/09 -
Post by: always 1 on February 01, 2009, 11:25:11 AM
I for one, dont believe that was Natalee in the trap.  Boys killed Natalee, men disposed of her.  It does look like someone was in the trap, however.  It does look more like a cap than a skirt.  Paulus lived on the island, he would know that there was oil beneath the water, he would know that someday they would chart the ocean floor.  Why would you put Natalee in a solid object where she could always be found??? What if she had been discovered a week later, a month later.  I would excpect that was someone who got in the way of a drug deal.  Why didnt the things in the plastic bags look like the original things pictured in the cage???  Why was FBI not on the ship to recover the remains???  Or were they???  In my opinion, Natalee was put somewhere else, where she could never be recovered.  Mine shaft, cremation, etc.  What about the bag that Blonde depicts????  That so looks like Natalee.  Ok, I am going to Church, you all can pick this apart and I will come back later and read it.    love to the family A1.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #797 1/30/09 -
Post by: Tamikosmom on February 01, 2009, 11:26:53 AM
These are the perpetrators in this case:

(http://i272.photobucket.com/albums/jj176/bastibro/Kalpoe/FFFFFFFFFFFF.jpg)

Caps, OE and even Kermit were/are just trying to get to the truth.
The problem is that some people having difficulties to stay humble and that they enjoy the fact that some people make them to important, unfortunately(and i exclude Kyle here) ::MonkeyWink::



1.Kermit-posted nothing but the truth backed up by the Freebirds,as well as Kyle!
2.Kyle-Potentially an accessory to obstruction of justice.Backed up by his own words,as well as actions.
3.CapsLockWizard-Has posted many false statements regarding this case!

And you call Kermit the fraud! ::MonkeyLaugh::

Kyle`s own words were ripped off their context by her. That`s my answer to you and to Janet.

sincerely, Bastian.

(http://i272.photobucket.com/albums/jj176/bastibro/Natalee/2fp29beth2.jpg)

I don't know you, so I'm not 'too' offended that you are insuating that I am a liar  ::MonkeyWink::


There is no other 'context' for Kyle's words.

There is no other 'context' for Kyle's words.

There is no other 'context' for Kyle's words.

There is no other 'context' for Kyle's words.

There is no other 'context' for Kyle's words.

There is no other 'context' for Kyle's words.





Sharon ... you are right.

Taking out of context or not ... Kyle Kingman's words speak for themselves ... they can stand alone ... they tell a story of betrayal of Natalee Holloways family of an American name John Silvetti.

Janet


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #797 1/30/09 -
Post by: Tamikosmom on February 01, 2009, 11:37:58 AM
I for one, dont believe that was Natalee in the trap.  Boys killed Natalee, men disposed of her.  It does look like someone was in the trap, however.  It does look more like a cap than a skirt.  Paulus lived on the island, he would know that there was oil beneath the water, he would know that someday they would chart the ocean floor.  Why would you put Natalee in a solid object where she could always be found??? What if she had been discovered a week later, a month later.  I would excpect that was someone who got in the way of a drug deal.  Why didnt the things in the plastic bags look like the original things pictured in the cage???  Why was FBI not on the ship to recover the remains???  Or were they???  In my opinion, Natalee was put somewhere else, where she could never be recovered.  Mine shaft, cremation, etc.  What about the bag that Blonde depicts????  That so looks like Natalee.  Ok, I am going to Church, you all can pick this apart and I will come back later and read it.    love to the family A1.

A1 ... I trust Kyle Kingman's expertise in regards to ROV image analyzing  His qualifications are above reproach.  If Kyle claims that Natalee Holloway's remains could have been in that cage ... then I believe that Natalee Holloway's remains could have been in that cage until proven otherwise

Then there are his own words regarding his sincere concern regarding the recovery process ...

Janet

+++++++

KYLE KINGMAN - IN HIS OWN WORDS

Kyle:  John is not a believer in the trap. He took ALE's word as gospel that it wasn't case related, yet never studied the videos or bothered to inquire further. He had plans on doing business with Aruba and in S. America and he didn't want to hurt any feelings by talks hinting at lack of complete trust and friendship.

Kyle:  I took the proportions of the body form from the head, to shoulder, to a 90 degree angle which I believed to be the hem line of Natalee's skirt. I then took those proportions and matched them to the photo of Natalee with what she was last seen wearing. The proportions matched within an inch from head, to shoulder, to skirt line. Based on this comparison and with what we believed we saw in the Dec 29th video, Tim Miller contacted the family and told them the 99.9% comment. I told Tim not to do anything until we have forensic results back after the site is processed. Jan 7th we sampled the contents and in my opinion we found the skirt under the sand along with the other items The blue fabric was found right where the skirt is pictured. If it isn't her, it will forever haunt me as a major cosmic WTF.

Kyle:   John didn't want Tim Miller on board the Persistence because he said Tim wasn't necessary any more and was a liability.

Kyle:   He (Tim Miller) stepped off on or about the 1st of Jan to follow up on the false lead in Costa Rica IIRC.

Kyle:    The Persistence had no divers on the 7th. Tim Trahan was our diver on the 30th-Dec, but he was out of the country at the time. The Aruban divers were on the police boat, dove from their boat, and returned to their boat.
 
Kyle:  They were immediately whisked away by the Aruban police and not seen of again by us on the 7th.

Kyle:  I get done in the survey room backing up the ROV dive and head to the back deck to talk to the Polis divers and see what they sampled and see the Polis boat way in the distance heading away fast. John doesn't seem concerned at all, but I am very dissapointed, concerned, and burning inside because I have a feeling that I/we will never know what they took from the trap. That evening I talked to John asking when we plan on recovering the trap. Previously this was part of the talks and plan, but this time he doesn't seem concerned about ever looking into the trap further. After John verbally BASHED me about the trap for what I said to Tim Miller about the sand body-form and that I believed her skirt was under the sand, John pretty much committed himself to the belief the trap wasn't what we were after. This shocked me because it was exactly what we were looking for- a fish trap lost at sea with human remains.

Kyle:  I did not feel the same and we had a major difference in opinion. He [John Silvetti] was the one who never pressed ALE to be completely open with us with the trap evidence. I would have forced them to. However, John was the one paying my invoices so I was forced to sit back and hope for the best.

Kyle:   John definitely believed the Arubans at their every word.

Kyle: Remember after the Jan-7th dive which sampled the trap Richardson told John emphatically to "keep searching she's still out there in the deep ocean".

Kyle: John Silvetti told me today that he may be returning to Aruba very soon for a few days. (05/08/08)

Kyle: He's [John Silvetti] seriously making plans to open an Aruba office so he can conduct business easier in S. America and that would allow him to do that. (06/10/08)

++++++++

KYLE KINGMAN - IN HIS OWN WORDS

Professional Qualifications

 
Kyle Kingman
Senior Geophysical Project Manager at Alpine Ocean Seismic Survey Inc.
Greater New York City Area

 
Current
Senior Geophysical Operations Manager at Alpine Ocean Seismic Survey Inc.
 
Past
Manager at Kingman Geophysical Solutions
 
Education
Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey-New Brunswick

Industry
Oil & Energy
_______
 
Kyle Kingman’s Summary

Kyle Kingman’s Specialties:
 
Project Management, Sonar Acquisition, hydrographic survey, data processing, remote sensing data analysis.

http://www.linkedin.com/pub/b/65/464


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #797 1/30/09 -
Post by: Lifesong on February 01, 2009, 11:42:04 AM


I'm way back on page 29, trying to catch up.

Klaas, when you get a minute could you post the ole' monkey bus?  I've searched and searched and can't find it...have you ever looked at the intimidating number of pages of your posts?  Yikes!! :) 

 ::MonkeyHaHa::

Thank you in advance!


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #797 1/30/09 -
Post by: Tamikosmom on February 01, 2009, 11:43:19 AM
Well ... I am off for the day Monkeys.

I do believe I heard a collective sigh of relief from the CnG site?

 ::MonkeyHaHa::

Church this morning and ... then picking up daughter and family in their van from Vancouver International.

 ::cartwheel::

The gang has been gone two weeks on a Disneyworld vacation and ... that was 1 1/2 weeks too long in my opinion.

Later, Janet


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #797 1/30/09 -
Post by: Vicki on February 01, 2009, 11:44:55 AM
Im sitting here crying my eyes out..I know that the family must be sooo hurting for all the fighting and bickering...Poor Natalee up in heaven looking down at us...Please lets all try and get along and stick to getting JUSTICE for NATALEE and her family...Ids was at the travel show on her feet all day along with 9 others being Natalees voice...handing out brocheres and prayer cards telling Natalee story...I dont want to get in the middle of who is right and who is wrong, cause I know we all love Natalee...but please lets all just try and get along for the sake of the family..I admire everyone who is still fighting to get answers no matter how its done....Alot has happened in almost 4 years...but we are all still here trying to help..I just love you all and want answers as I know you all do to...anyway, the BOYCOTT TRAVEL SHOW was a HUGE success and pictures will be forth coming....got to run but PEACE to you all....


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #797 1/30/09 -
Post by: Vicki on February 01, 2009, 11:47:27 AM
PS Tamikosmom..Love to you and your family....


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #797 1/30/09 -
Post by: Edward on February 01, 2009, 11:49:19 AM
I for one, don't believe that was Natalee in the trap.  Boys killed Natalee, men disposed of her.  It does look like someone was in the trap, however.  It does look more like a cap than a skirt.  Paulus lived on the island, he would know that there was oil beneath the water, he would know that someday they would chart the ocean floor.  Why would you put Natalee in a solid object where she could always be found??? What if she had been discovered a week later, a month later.  I would expect that was someone who got in the way of a drug deal.  Why didn't the things in the plastic bags look like the original things pictured in the cage???  Why was FBI not on the ship to recover the remains???  Or were they???  In my opinion, Natalee was put somewhere else, where she could never be recovered.  Mine shaft, cremation, etc.  What about the bag that Blonde depicts????  That so looks like Natalee.  Ok, I am going to Church, you all can pick this apart and I will come back later and read it.    love to the family A1.

Mine shaft

I am am happy somebody is paying attention.. I hope you had the opportunity to read the pdf I posted last week. Where a Ohio state university group went to Aruba early on in this case and did a full geological study of the island clearly showing the mine shafts on Aruba and how far down they are and how much water is in them.. A perfect disposal site
 It is by far the most likely place where the body was put after it was retrieved from the landfill after Dave was kicked out of the landfill.
Thank-God for Common sense.. ::MonkeyWink::

There was something in the trap..but who knows what.. Not Our Natalee .. Waste of time looking for villain's in that story.
jmho 


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #797 1/30/09 -
Post by: texasmom on February 01, 2009, 11:49:44 AM
Well ... I am off for the day Monkeys.

I do believe I heard a collective sigh of relief from the CnG site?

 ::MonkeyHaHa::

Church this morning and ... then picking up daughter and family in their van from Vancouver International.

 ::cartwheel::

The gang has been gone two weeks on a Disneyworld vacation and ... that was 1 1/2 weeks too long in my opinion.

Later, Janet

Have a great day Janet!  I'm glad the family is finally coming home, I know you've missed them!  Thanks for all you do!

Hugs,
tm


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #797 1/30/09 -
Post by: Blue Moon on February 01, 2009, 11:52:22 AM
I for one am very interested to see pictures and hear the stories to be told about the show.  Thanks to Lou and Vickie for being a voice for Natalee and her family.

Off to Tennessee but will look forward to reading about the show when I return.

Have a good day.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #797 1/30/09 -
Post by: texasmom on February 01, 2009, 11:55:01 AM
I for one am very interested to see pictures and hear the stories to be told about the show.  Thanks to Lou and Vickie for being a voice for Natalee and her family.

Off to Tennessee but will look forward to reading about the show when I return.

Have a good day.

Drive safe, and have a good trip Blue Moon!   ::MonkeyCool::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #797 1/30/09 -
Post by: klaasend on February 01, 2009, 11:58:13 AM


I'm way back on page 29, trying to catch up.

Klaas, when you get a minute could you post the ole' monkey bus?  I've searched and searched and can't find it...have you ever looked at the intimidating number of pages of your posts?  Yikes!! :) 

 ::MonkeyHaHa::

Thank you in advance!


(http://i118.photobucket.com/albums/o100/klaasen3/Sub5/bbusfinal081105-1.jpg)


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #797 1/30/09 -
Post by: Edward on February 01, 2009, 12:02:39 PM
The bus is so cool.. ::MonkeyDance::
Beth was holding a quilt made for her by a BFN member in a book signing.. I am on the quilt and it made me feel good to see Beth holding it..
I hope you all put that in a frame and send it to her too.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #797 1/30/09 -
Post by: klaasend on February 01, 2009, 12:04:40 PM
The bus is so cool.. ::MonkeyDance::
Beth was holding a quilt made for her by a BFN member in a book signing.. I am on the quilt and it made me feel good to see Beth holding it..
I hope you all put that in a frame and send it to her too.

I must be having a photobucket problem.  Can you see the bus I posted above or do you see nothing?


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #797 1/30/09 -
Post by: Vicki on February 01, 2009, 12:14:12 PM
I see it Klaas...


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #797 1/30/09 -
Post by: Lifesong on February 01, 2009, 12:16:00 PM
The bus is so cool.. ::MonkeyDance::
Beth was holding a quilt made for her by a BFN member in a book signing.. I am on the quilt and it made me feel good to see Beth holding it..
I hope you all put that in a frame and send it to her too.

I must be having a photobucket problem.  Can you see the bus I posted above or do you see nothing?

I can see & thanks so much!

Do you happen to know approx. when the bus was finished / month/year approximation?  It's not terribly important, I'd just like to have it.

Thanks again!


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #797 1/30/09 -
Post by: Lifesong on February 01, 2009, 12:17:17 PM
Nevermind, Klaas!  I see it in the file name 8/11/05.

Much appreciated.



Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #797 1/30/09 -
Post by: 2NJSons_Mom on February 01, 2009, 12:17:25 PM
I can see it, Klaas.

Good morning, everyone.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #797 1/30/09 -
Post by: Lifesong on February 01, 2009, 12:20:01 PM

(http://i118.photobucket.com/albums/o100/klaasen3/Sub5/bbusfinal081105-1.jpg)


Heh heh heh! 

I see ShellBelle with Joe Scarborough, that brings back memories.



Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #797 1/30/09 -
Post by: Lifesong on February 01, 2009, 12:22:55 PM
I can see it, Klaas.

Good morning, everyone.

Good morning, 2NJ.

I'm going to trudge along back to page 30 now and try to get caught up...lots of interruptions today, so I know its going to take awhile.  Will see all you monkeys on the new thread!

 ::MonkeyCool::



Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #797 1/30/09 -
Post by: 2NJSons_Mom on February 01, 2009, 12:24:41 PM
Lifesong,

Seems not so long ago with the bus, ship, Christmas trees.....where did the time go?  Interesting 'The Way We Were' moment.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #797 1/30/09 -
Post by: texasmom on February 01, 2009, 12:25:34 PM
I can see it, Klaas.

Good morning, everyone.

Good morning, 2NJ.

I'm going to trudge along back to page 30 now and try to get caught up...lots of interruptions today, so I know its going to take awhile.  Will see all you monkeys on the new thread!

 ::MonkeyCool::



See ya later Lifesong!  I feel for ya!   ::MonkeyWink::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #797 1/30/09 -
Post by: 2NJSons_Mom on February 01, 2009, 12:27:18 PM
I can see it, Klaas.

Good morning, everyone.

Good morning, 2NJ.

I'm going to trudge along back to page 30 now and try to get caught up...lots of interruptions today, so I know its going to take awhile.  Will see all you monkeys on the new thread!

 ::MonkeyCool::



 ::MonkeyHaHa::  I realized it was afternoon here after I posted.  I guess I covered most of the zones here in the US. 


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #797 1/30/09 -
Post by: cubbeegirl on February 01, 2009, 12:28:46 PM


I'm way back on page 29, trying to catch up.

Klaas, when you get a minute could you post the ole' monkey bus?  I've searched and searched and can't find it...have you ever looked at the intimidating number of pages of your posts?  Yikes!! :) 

 ::MonkeyHaHa::

Thank you in advance!


(http://i118.photobucket.com/albums/o100/klaasen3/Sub5/bbusfinal081105-1.jpg)

WOW! Just came in here for my Sunday morning catch up and got a big blast from the past!
Thanks klaas!!!


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #797 1/30/09 -
Post by: bastibro on February 01, 2009, 12:28:54 PM
I can see it, Klaas.

Good morning, everyone.

Good morning, 2NJ.

I'm going to trudge along back to page 30 now and try to get caught up...lots of interruptions today, so I know its going to take awhile.  Will see all you monkeys on the new thread!

 ::MonkeyCool::



Good morning 2NJ, I wish everyone a beautiful day.
BTW That bus looks real cosy LOL


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #797 1/30/09 -
Post by: hotping on February 01, 2009, 12:43:35 PM
Good Morning/Afternoon Monkeys!

Justice will come We just don't know when...

http://www.digitaljournal.com/article/266285

Crime doesn’t pay these days with the use of DNA. After 34 years, justice comes to a killer and rapist, Jerome Barrett, 61 .

. The killer of college student, Sarah Des Prez, was found and now has been convicted and sentenced to life for killing her in 1975.

The grief of a family has been described as awful, whether a young child, like Caylee Anthony or JonBenet Ramsey or an adult daughter like Natalee Holloway is killed. The terrible grief of the Ramseys was increased by accusations and rumors that either the mother, Patsy Ramsey, or the father, John Ramsey, had killed their own daughter. DNA proved they didn’t. . Natalee’s mother Beth Holloway Twitty still doesn’t know what happened to her daughter who disappeared in Aruba and where there has been speculation that Natalee was killed. In the case of Caylee Anthony a trial is pending with the mother accused of killing her. What evidence will be used in this case is still relatively unknown.


Not knowing what happened and who the killer was of a child has been described by John Walsh, founder of the National Center for Missing and Exploited Children and host of America’s Most Wanted, as terrible. His own son Adam’s killer, Ottis Toole, was brought to justice in December of 2008 after 27 years. Now a family in Tennessee has some relief, by learning who killed the young Sarah and that the perpetrator is now being punished after decades of wondering.

DNA is often touted for helping free folks, but it’s used to convict as well. In this case it was the DNA match that did it in for Jerome Barrett. Investigators said he showed no emotion when he was arrested and none when the sentence was read.

Barrett was a convicted rapist who had been in prison from 1976 until 2002. He had been accused of three sexual assaults but only convicted for a rape. While in jail he talked with a fellow inmate about killing a young woman in 1975, unable to remember why. The inmate, Sheldon Anter, reported Barrett’s confession.

Another family may have some relief in July. Barrett will be going to trial for killing and raping 9-year-old Marcia Trimble, who was found strangled in a garage near her Green Hills home also in 1975. JonBenet’s killer has never been found. Natalee Holloway remains missing and what happened to her a mystery.

Sometimes real life has more drama than television shows, as the case of Barrett reveals.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #797 1/30/09 -
Post by: Edward on February 01, 2009, 12:53:03 PM
The bus is so cool.. ::MonkeyDance::
Beth was holding a quilt made for her by a BFN member in a book signing.. I am on the quilt and it made me feel good to see Beth holding it..
I hope you all put that in a frame and send it to her too.

I must be having a photobucket problem.  Can you see the bus I posted above or do you see nothing?

Sorry
I went to the shower.. Yes I had seen it.  ::MonkeyWink::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #797 1/30/09 -
Post by: klaasend on February 01, 2009, 01:09:01 PM
I posted part one yesterday.  Here are parts two and three:

Link to Part 1:
http://www.sacramentopress.com/headline/2602/HPI_in_Aruba_In_Search_of_Natalee_Holloway_Part_2#2601

Part 2

http://www.sacramentopress.com/headline/2601/HPI_in_Aruba_In_Search_of_Natalee_Holloway_Part_1#2602

HPI in Aruba: In Search of Natalee Holloway Part 2

by Paul Roberts, published on January 20, 2009 at 7:10PM

Vasilisa has her own ghost story from Jaimaca. When she was 12 years old, she saw a woman in white holding a handbag near a big tree. As she watched the woman, she vanished in front of Vasilisa's eyes. Here in Aruba, her friend was jogging and saw a man with no shirt, as he passed the man with no shirt, he vanished in front of his eyes. Vasilisa works at the Mambo Jambo and put on Conversations with a Serial Killer from Shannon McCabe's website and everyone at Mambo Jambo was watching Shannon and I talk about Richard Trenton Chase for Two Four Productions. Vasilisa had to check out my credentials and started reading some of my articles at Alien Seeker News. Vasilisa's desire is to meet celebrity psychic Nancy Bradley. I told her, I will hook her up when I returned back to the States.

The next person I interviewed was Fanny Rodriguez. Fanny is a proclaimed psychic and she says when she drives 60 mph, she can see ghosts walking along the road. She at times astral projects from her body. One night as she laid in bed with her boyfriend, she saw her boyfriend standing over her, but yet her boyfriend was still next to her in bed. Either we have a ghost that does a good impersonation of her boyfriend or her boyfriend astral projected himself and that is what Fanny saw.

I met Darierre del Roxario on the street and she attests that Natalee Holloway is actually seen walking along the beach, this is the blonde phantom woman of the beach.

My next victims, I mean interviewees were three women from Italy. I met the lovely Susy Serra and her two girlfriends, they are here from Italy. Instead of telling me ghost stories, these ladies wanted me to tell them ghost stories. So, I talked the night away about one encounter after another. All three women were fascinated about the paranormal.

After the three Italian women left, I went to another club, it was so jam packed, that people were dancing on the streets, outside the door of this establishment. Here I met a Swedish girl that has no interest in the paranormal, but had a strong interest in Salsa dancing. I showed her some quick moves and she was hooked. We danced in the street during a down pour of rain that lasted for 15 minutes. We were both soaked.

Looking at the time, I had to attempt to get EVPs of Natalee Holloway. The Swedish girl who wishes to remain anonymous tagged along with me via taxi to a location where Natalee may have been. Asking a series of questions, it appears I may have gotten one EVP of a woman.

Paul: Natalee are you here? EVP of young woman: Help me please.

More EVP attempts are made and nothing is found for this night. I close this story for now, as the Swedish girl is bringing me a long island iced tea, as she sips on an Arubian beer. Let's see what happens tomorrow.

Well, tomorrow is here. It's Thursday! I woke up before 10am! Yahoo! I didn't miss the breakfast buffet here at the hotel! After I finished eating, went down to the Havana Beach and laid out. This beach is a trip, it has big lizards walking around on the beach. Also, you might note, there are big green Iguanas that walk around Aruba parks. The parks in Aruba do not have squirrels, they have big green lizards. But, let's get back to the beach. When you go into the water, you have fish swimming around your legs. The water is crystal clear and warm! On the beach I met Patricia Howard from the Southern part of London. It was an enjoyable conversation with Patricia, since I have been to London and I told her all of the places I visited while in London.

It's nice to pass time with people that are worldly, you get a better perspective of life. Worldly people are always captivating. On this day, I was very successful in something I wanted to do since I have been out here. To travel over to Venezuela. But, I will tell you about that in a minute. As I walk the streets of Aruba, people have reggae music or salsa music blasting from their cars, from their homes, from their businesses. You can hear reggae artists such as the classic Bob Marley and the Wailers and the newer reggae artists such as D' Angel, Lady Saw, Barbee. On this day, would visit the Eet Cafe - The Paddock and Iguana Joes. I encountered a lovely lady named Leslie Kain from Cincinnati. Cincinnati, Ohio is just another place I have been to, so it was easy to talk with Leslie about her home town. But, what I didn't know about her home town is a place called Bobby Mackeys. In this old bar and restaurant she tells me that the cellar of this establishment is very haunted. She says objects constantly move around and many patrons have seen full body apparitions while frequenting this place. Okay Leslie, you have me convinced, if I ever get back to Cincinnati, I will definitely check this place out!

As I was sitting at the Burger King #14524 - Caya Betico Croes #81, Oranjestad, Aruba, I met Captain Crowley. I was choking down my double Whopper with cheese and large coke, that cost me a mere $7.60. This is better that the other prices I have been paying for meals. I'm starting to watch my budget now. I got into a conversation with Captain Crowley and he told me he has a vessel called the Smidgen parked off the docks. I told him how desperately I have been wanting to go over to Venezuela. Captain Crowley said he could oblige for a sum of $200.00. So, much for my budget...sigh. The only problem is that he will not be able to dock his boat in Venezuela, but he promised me that I could see the coastline and that I will be in Venezuela territorial waters. I can make the claim that I have been in the territory of Venezuela. I agreed and handed over $200.00 cash. This is a trip that would be well worth it. It's only a mere 15 miles to Venezuela and the reason why they have no ferry boats going over to Venezuela is because there is some bitterness between Venezuela and Aruba. The Venezuela president has been rubbing shoulders with the Russian president and both have been eyeing oil wells near and around Aruba. Aruba is afraid that Venezuela may take claim of their island. The 15 mile ride seemed to go on forever, but finally I was in territorial waters and could see the gorgeous coastline of Venezuela. One of the boat hands is from Venezuela, his name is Fredrico Perez. I asked Fredrico are there any cattle mutilations in Venezuela, evil gnomes or UFOs.

Fredrico in his own words says: Some people say that silver discs fly in and around the capitol of Venezuela. There have been cattle mutilations back in the late 80s. I don't know about gnomes, but it is said that there are little people living in the forests of Venezuela. Some of these little people have been seen near landed UFOs. I have a friend who says that he saw a little person on a high tree branch. As my friend looked at the little person, he could see that his skin seemed leathery, his color was sort of bluish and his eyes were red. My friend was very scared and ran from the tree.

I enjoyed my boat ride and the feel of the wind in my face was ecstatic. When I got off the boat, my hair was completely wind blown and I must have frightened many tourists with my wind blown appearance. Time to refresh myself back at the hotel. Goodbye Punto Fijo, Venezuela.

As I relax at my hotel bar sipping on an Arubian beer, I start a conversation with Lila Megens. Lila is from Venezuela and I easily place her into a conversation about ghosts and asked her if she ever had a paranormal experience. Lila tells me that when her sister was 7 years old, she complained about headaches. Then one day out of the clear blue, she passed away. Her mother was completely traumatized from this experience and would prepare a place on the table for her daughter, as if she was still alive. Every day her mother cried. Lila and her other sister had a vision that they were playing with their sister that passed away. The deceased sister stated to both living sisters, that she was still there, but she cannot be touched. She explains to both living sisters that she does not belong here, but to tell mother to please let her rest. Both visions were similar. When the mother heard of this, she finally calmed down and the visions stopped.

I ended this night by going back to the Mambo Jambo and listening to Madonna's song 'Holiday' and having a few laughs with the lady bartenders. On my way back to the hotel, I made some more EVP attempts at the beach and I was unsuccessful. Okay, it's time to sleep, tomorrow is Friday!

It's Friday! This week is going by fast. As I look out from my hotel through the palm trees that hold large coconuts, I see a multi-colored designed bus. These buses that travel throughout Aruba are referred to as Bar Hopping Buses. At night time, they carry party revelers throughout Aruba and they make stops at various nightclubs and bars. You don't see things like that in Sacramento. Yep! I am not in Kansas anymore.

Today I went on the Atlantis submarine tour. I have never been on a real submarine, but I did this time. I have been on a 1/2 submarine in Tahiti, but this is something I have never experienced. Besides seeing the spectacular coral reefs and an abundance of colorful sea life, you also get to see two shipwrecks. One of the shipwrecks is the Antilla. This was once a German U-boat supply ship. During World War II, Dutch Marines gave the ship 24 hours to surrender.

http://www.sacramentopress.com/headline/2602/HPI_in_Aruba_In_Search_of_Natalee_Holloway_Part_2#2603

HPI in Aruba: In Search of Natalee Holloway Part 3

by Paul Roberts, published on January 20, 2009 at 7:11PM

The Captain of the ship decided not to turn over his ship to the Dutch Marines, so he scuttled the ship. He safely had the crewmen go to the shore. He then heated up the boilers and opened the sea cocks. When the cold water hit the hot boilers, the ship exploded, ripping the ship in half. It sank in eight minutes. How exciting to see this history in the ocean. For more information, check out: www.atlantisadventures.com/aruba If you visit Aruba, the submarine tour is a must!

An Arubian that does not want to be identified tells me an Arubian ghost story. A man who would go to the beach by himself, would at times see a small boy in a t-shirt, that had no arms. The boy would stare at the man and walk towards the trees and vanish. The man thinking it was some boy that lived near the beach, thought nothing of it. Then one day, the boy with no arms appears again and approaches the man. The boy seemed to have a sinister look on his face. The man felt no threat from the little boy. As the boy got closer, he bit the man's leg viciously. The man had a stroke. The man screamed and people on the beach hearing the scream assisted the man. It was determined he had a stroke on the beach, but there was also a large bite mark on his leg.

Today spent most of the whole day at the Havana Beach Club, sipping pina coladas. Met another Columbian girl. Her name is Yuli Cacezes, she is an aspiring writer and I was giving her tips that may be beneficial for her future writing career.

On this night, went to another beach area for an EVP session. I asked about 20 or so questions. One questionable EVP is this one, that needs further analysis:

Paul: Natalee, how did you die? EVP of Woman: Don't know.

Well, today is Saturday. Time to lay out at the Havana Beach. I was walking over to the beach and they have artificially colored blue rocks and to my surprise there is a Chameleon, the Chameleon was a bright blue. Amazing! As I was in the water, I struck up a conversation with Pablia, another lady from Columbia. Now check this out. I don't speak any Spanish, sure...I know certain words and Pablia doesn't know how to speak English. But, with sign language and certain word recognition, I was able to gather this information. Pablia is from Columbia, she has 3 children, she loves the water. She is not fond of the Venezuela president and feels he may invade Aruba, because of the oil. She has a large family in Columbia, but a small family here in Aruba. She has been to Orlando, Florida and she understands I am from California. Now, that is mind blowing. Not being able to speak Spanish, but having a full on conversation and understanding what is being said. I amaze myself sometimes.

Enough of that, tonight went back to Mambo Jambo for more interviews. With 4 long island iced teas and 2 jello shots, I was still able to conduct interviews. The first interview tonight was a Columbian girl named Dora Zapata. She pointed the way to Cafe Bahia which was formerly known as Senor Frog. Yes! Senor Frog is the club where Natalee Holloway was last seen. After some Salsa dancing at Mambo Jambo, I will attempt to get some EVPs at Cafe Bahia. Tonight, I salsa danced with two ladies from Venezuela (Asdreina and Andrea). I really felt my salsa dancing sucked, but some Latino guys came over to tell me that I did a great job, especially when I started spinning them around and around and around. So, who knows. Perhaps I did good, perhaps I didn't. It is not easy to dance Salsa, especially if you are not familiar with the music. While I took a break from these ladies, I talked with Nolan Howe from Michigan. Nolan plans to join our HPI Michigan Branch Office. Nolan was completely fascinated with my stories and was quite knowledgeable about the paranormal. I was impressed.

After the nightclub ended, I went over to Cafe Bahia and took some pictures and tried to get some EVPs. Tonight I was unsuccessful in getting any EVPs. I made about 15 attempts at Cafe Bahia.

Special Note: People I interviewed claim that Natalee Holloway was last seen at the Senor Frog and not Carlos 'n Charlies like the newspapers reported. The 'don't know' EVP was obtained near the California Lighthouse.

Today is Sunday. I promised I would take it easy today, because I fly out on Monday. So, I did some EVP work at Pinchos Grill & Bar on the Pier. No success in obtaining EVPs. Then laid out at the Havana Beach Club, where I met two Columbian women - Jenny Castano and her girlfriend Angela Guitterez. They speak no English and I just know a few key words in Spanish and got into a great conversation with them, using a lot of sign language. Jenny fed me some Special K peaches and berries bars and in turn I bought them two pina coladas. Now I have committed myself to take them both to Mambo Jambo for dancing. As Jenny's girlfriend drove me back to my hotel from the beach, she played some Salsa music that she loves. I'm getting used to this Salsa music. It doesn't seem like I will be getting any rest tonight...sigh. It's not easy being a ghosthunter in an exotic land. No wonder they call Aruba - One Happy Island.

7pm and Jenny Castano & Angela Guitterez are at my door. We all hop in Angela's car and head downtown. They show me where Carlos 'n Charlies Restaurant and Bar is. They claim that Natalee Holloway was at this bar and it was the last place she was seen, not Senor Frog. But, Senor Frog is very close to Carlos 'n Charlies Restaurant and I can see how the Arubians could get that confused. Angela allowed me to drive her car on the streets of Aruba, that was a blast! On this night the three of us had Columbian dinners at Carlos Arango Dario Hincapie Jierras Colombianas - Schektstraat No 58. Wow! Columbian food is quite delicious and satisfied my pallet immensely! Afterwards we went to the Well Well Restaurant where Angela works as a bartender. We then finalized the night at the Wing Hung Restaurant and Bar (this is a Columbian bar), the prices are very good for drinks. The ladies had several drinks and shots and it cost a mere $20.00. Jenny taught me how to Columbian Salsa. My Salsa was top notch tonight and people at the bar were clapping. Ahhh...I still have it! What an exceptional evening and spent it looking at the billions of stars in the night sky with Jenny. No EVP work tonight, if you can catch my drift. I will miss Aruba. Tomorrow is the day I go home....double sigh.

Monday is here and I am jetting back home. Seated next to me is Kim and Andy Miller from Oakland. I love this couple, we had such a captivating conversation for most of the time heading to Oakland from Boston. Kim is very well traveled and we discussed the many countries we have visited. Kim had a great ghost story about the Mt. View Cemetery in Oakland. The very same cemetery where I had a scouting mission. Here is the story, that occurred in the 1800s. A wealthy doctor married a young gold digger women. He bought her a whopping diamond wedding ring. During their marriage, she became ill and died suddenly. The good doctor discovers after her demise that she had cheated on him. One night he heads out to the Mt. View Cemetery and digs up her fresh grave to get his ring back. As he pulls off her ring, she sits up from her coffin. The doctor has a heart attack on the spot and dies. It was discovered that his wife was accidently buried alive. Thank you Kim for this great story. Andy Miller, Kim's significant other has a great website at: www.burmesemountaindog.org - Check it out when you have a chance.

This concludes my investigation in Aruba. While I was in Aruba, I did some promoting of HPI and Ghost Girls. The 4 female bartenders of Mambo Jambo allowed me to place Ghost Girls business cards on all of the seats of the club and the DJ announced that Ghost Girls business cards were placed on the seats, because an American ghosthunter and ghostwriter is in Aruba. That was some great advertising by Mambo Jambo and I thank them for this!

FINDINGS:

I interviewed dozens of people on the streets of Aruba. Many who are not even mentioned in this article. Many people confirm that a blonde phantom woman does walk the beaches of Aruba. I cannot confirm that this blonde phantom woman is Natalee Holloway. During my EVP sessions, the two EVPs I received are from a woman, but she does not confirm she is Natalee Holloway, even though the 'don't know' EVP, I do ask a question directed to Natalee and received the EVP.

CONCLUSION:

With the many witnesses that claim to have seen or heard about the blonde phantom woman of the Aruba beaches, I do believe they are seeing something that may be paranormal. With the two EVPs that I received, there is a strong indication that there is paranormal activity. I gathered no positive proof that the EVPs are from Natalee Holloway, nor did I ever see a blonde phantom woman on the beaches of Aruba. Many people believe Joran spiked Natalee's drinks with drugs. Many people believe that Joran's father took Natalee on his boat and dumped her body in the ocean. One person I interviewed that calls herself Sasha, says he received this information from the circle of friends that were associated with Joran. My thoughts, when rumors are this strong, there appears there may be some type of foundation of truth and this matter should continue being investigated by the police. As long as Natalee's death is not confirmed, Aruba cannot truly be 'one happy island'. There must be a conclusion to this and justice must be served! Natalee will always be in the hearts of millions. She is an innocent girl that confronted evil and paid a terrible price. God bless Natalee.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #797 1/30/09 -
Post by: texasmom on February 01, 2009, 01:21:16 PM



Thanks Klaas!


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #797 1/30/09 -
Post by: nimrod on February 01, 2009, 01:56:58 PM
Im sitting here crying my eyes out..I know that the family must be sooo hurting for all the fighting and bickering...Poor Natalee up in heaven looking down at us...Please lets all try and get along and stick to getting JUSTICE for NATALEE and her family...Ids was at the travel show on her feet all day along with 9 others being Natalees voice...handing out brocheres and prayer cards telling Natalee story...I dont want to get in the middle of who is right and who is wrong, cause I know we all love Natalee...but please lets all just try and get along for the sake of the family..I admire everyone who is still fighting to get answers no matter how its done....Alot has happened in almost 4 years...but we are all still here trying to help..I just love you all and want answers as I know you all do to...anyway, the BOYCOTT TRAVEL SHOW was a HUGE success and pictures will be forth coming....got to run but PEACE to you all....


Vickie, thanks for all you do.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #797 1/30/09 -
Post by: texasmom on February 01, 2009, 02:01:09 PM
Every time I see this, I want to thank Ms. Maggie for her courage.

I know everyone has probably seen the story before, I just thought it was a great reminder.

http://getagripmonkey.blogspot.com/2005_10_16_archive.html

(http://4.bp.blogspot.com/_JWuHA8r2lnk/R7hbXvB_VZI/AAAAAAAAAD4/w48Rn8IzOSQ/s320/caso+natalee+holoway.1.jpg)  (http://3.bp.blogspot.com/_JWuHA8r2lnk/R7hbdfB_VaI/AAAAAAAAAEA/frQmuqKSoGE/s320/casonatalee+holoway2.jpg)
Cruise Ship tourist protests in front of Courthouse
DIARIO Aruba
10/20/2005

ORANJESTAD (AAN): An American tourist who arrived Wednesday to our island on board the cruise ship “Volendam” of the Holland America Line, came determined to hold a protest in front of the courthouse.

Dressed in a t-shirt that says in the front: “Give Natalee Justice” and in the back “No Body ≠ No Crime”, the tourist expressed her opinion about Natalee’s case in silence.

Read in our edition from today what motivated Mrs. Maggie to take this type of action.

[translated by Getagrip]
Posted by Getagrip at 10/20/2005 04:05:00 PM


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #797 1/30/09 -
Post by: Keepthefaith on February 01, 2009, 02:02:06 PM
Im sitting here crying my eyes out..I know that the family must be sooo hurting for all the fighting and bickering...Poor Natalee up in heaven looking down at us...Please lets all try and get along and stick to getting JUSTICE for NATALEE and her family...Ids was at the travel show on her feet all day along with 9 others being Natalees voice...handing out brocheres and prayer cards telling Natalee story...I dont want to get in the middle of who is right and who is wrong, cause I know we all love Natalee...but please lets all just try and get along for the sake of the family..I admire everyone who is still fighting to get answers no matter how its done....Alot has happened in almost 4 years...but we are all still here trying to help..I just love you all and want answers as I know you all do to...anyway, the BOYCOTT TRAVEL SHOW was a HUGE success and pictures will be forth coming....got to run but PEACE to you all....


Vickie, thanks for all you do.

Nimrod

1. Actually, I believe the Freebirds contacted Kyle first and it was about the time the search was over.
2. The last thing I heard was that Beth didn't want the Freebirds to release any negative comments about the Persistence.
3. Actually Kyle said he "thought" they were human remains. Afterall, he only had the same photos that we all were looking at, so it was Kyle's opinion only.
4. We have never heard Tim Miller's side of when and why he left the Persistence. I received a very nice thank you letter from Tim for my donation to the Persistence's search for Natalee a couple of weeks after Tim "abruptly" left.
5. I think Kermit's words are all out of context. It reminds me of the same liberal tactics that were used to remove a republican president from office.  lol


KEEPTHEFAITH ::MonkeyWink::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #797 1/30/09 -
Post by: Tamikosmom on February 01, 2009, 02:10:46 PM
Im sitting here crying my eyes out..I know that the family must be sooo hurting for all the fighting and bickering...Poor Natalee up in heaven looking down at us...Please lets all try and get along and stick to getting JUSTICE for NATALEE and her family...Ids was at the travel show on her feet all day along with 9 others being Natalees voice...handing out brocheres and prayer cards telling Natalee story...I dont want to get in the middle of who is right and who is wrong, cause I know we all love Natalee...but please lets all just try and get along for the sake of the family..I admire everyone who is still fighting to get answers no matter how its done....Alot has happened in almost 4 years...but we are all still here trying to help...  just love you all and want answers as I know you all do to...anyway, the BOYCOTT TRAVEL SHOW was a HUGE success and pictures will be forth coming....got to run but PEACE to you all....


 ::cartwheel::

BOYCOTT ARUBA!!!




Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #797 1/30/09 -
Post by: Keepthefaith on February 01, 2009, 02:13:46 PM
Im sitting here crying my eyes out..I know that the family must be sooo hurting for all the fighting and bickering...Poor Natalee up in heaven looking down at us...Please lets all try and get along and stick to getting JUSTICE for NATALEE and her family...Ids was at the travel show on her feet all day along with 9 others being Natalees voice...handing out brocheres and prayer cards telling Natalee story...I dont want to get in the middle of who is right and who is wrong, cause I know we all love Natalee...but please lets all just try and get along for the sake of the family..I admire everyone who is still fighting to get answers no matter how its done....Alot has happened in almost 4 years...but we are all still here trying to help..I just love you all and want answers as I know you all do to...anyway, the BOYCOTT TRAVEL SHOW was a HUGE success and pictures will be forth coming....got to run but PEACE to you all....

NONESUCHE

Interesting night, it's a shame hotshot won't stay and take the heat she and bastibro stirred up? Not surprising now is it?

I have a couple of things to say here and I don't say much often, so I hope some of you will indulge me. I'm not a true 'insider' as hotshot and ldstlou claim to be but I can tell you this much, the family is TIRED of watching what's happening on this thread. That I do know on good authority.

Also, this is for hotshot. I recall who began the first acting out against SM way back at the beginning of this and it was you and Ringo. Some of us foolishly let you plant half-truth's in our heads and/or make us doubt the intent of some who never deserved that. You have one outrageous audacity to state it's SM creating all of the issues now.

Some of us remember the history and I would think after four years of you inserting yourself as the super sleuth above all others to the degree that Dave won't even give you his phone number, that you could buy a clue !

I will repeat, the family is not happy to see all of these drive-by attacks and if you respect them, you will respect their feelings and the intent of this forum to support Natalee above all else.

KEEPTHEFAITH



Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #797 1/30/09 - 2/1/09
Post by: texasmom on February 01, 2009, 02:16:41 PM
Who's covering the costs?  Who was willing to absorb the costs if they're not successful; but will surely share in the proceeds if they are successful?


http://getagripmonkey.blogspot.com/2005_10_16_archive.html

Lawsuit Kalpoe against Skeeters too expensive
Amigoe.com
10/20/2005

ARUBA – “My client has limited means and cannot just institute a lawsuit in the United States”, said lawyer Rudi Oomen about the rumours that his client Deepak Kalpoe will take legal proceedings against Jamie Skeeters in the States. Skeeters is the man that recorded a conversation with Kalpoe and sold it to Dr. Phil’s TV-show.

Oomen indicated that if there are possibilities to bring charges against Skeeters without it costing too much money, they will definitely consider it. “I’m still looking for those possibilities.” Kalpoe would have said on the tape that all the three boys had sex with Holloway. Therefore, on the Internet-sites on the Holloway-case and in the American TV-shows, the tape is being considered as evident of guilt of Joran van der Sloot, Satish and Deepak Kalpoe. According to Oomen, Kalpoe had never said this. “Everybody can hear that tape was put together with cutting and pasting.”

The Public Prosecutor (OM) would like to get hold of the tape in order to investigate its authenticity. But in exchange for this, an OM agent has to appear in the TV-show of Dr. Phil. Oomen: “I have advised the OM to take the official course and submit a legal assistance request..” Oomen says that also his client wishes the tape to be investigated, because Kalpoe is positive that the tape was tempered with. Skeeters had posed as somebody that wants to help Kalpoe in the Internet-café where he works. There conversation was secretly taped and months later broadcasted in Dr. Phil’s TV-show.
Kalpoe wants some peace and quiet at this moment. Kalpoe could pick up his belongings, including his car today. He doesn’t understand why the OM had kept these for so long. It took Oomen to threat the OM with a lawsuit for them to finally release the car.
Posted by Getagrip at 10/20/2005 03:05:00 PM


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #797 1/30/09 - 2/1/09
Post by: Tamikosmom on February 01, 2009, 02:17:24 PM
I am just driving by.

We stopped home after the church service for a quick bite and ... will be taking off the Vancouver International shortly.

Have a good day Monkeys!!

Janet
11:15 AM PT


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #797 1/30/09 - 2/1/09
Post by: Keepthefaith on February 01, 2009, 02:19:08 PM
I am just driving by.

We stopped home after the church service for a quick bite and ... will be taking off the Vancouver International shortly.

Have a good day Monkeys!!

Janet
11:15 AM PT

Muffy,San.Can we pull out the little pick car for Janet? ::MonkeyHaHa::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #797 1/30/09 -
Post by: wreck on February 01, 2009, 02:19:41 PM
Im sitting here crying my eyes out..I know that the family must be sooo hurting for all the fighting and bickering...Poor Natalee up in heaven looking down at us...Please lets all try and get along and stick to getting JUSTICE for NATALEE and her family...Ids was at the travel show on her feet all day along with 9 others being Natalees voice...handing out brocheres and prayer cards telling Natalee story...I dont want to get in the middle of who is right and who is wrong, cause I know we all love Natalee...but please lets all just try and get along for the sake of the family..I admire everyone who is still fighting to get answers no matter how its done....Alot has happened in almost 4 years...but we are all still here trying to help..I just love you all and want answers as I know you all do to...anyway, the BOYCOTT TRAVEL SHOW was a HUGE success and pictures will be forth coming....got to run but PEACE to you all....

NONESUCHE

Interesting night, it's a shame hotshot won't stay and take the heat she and bastibro stirred up? Not surprising now is it?

I have a couple of things to say here and I don't say much often, so I hope some of you will indulge me. I'm not a true 'insider' as hotshot and ldstlou claim to be but I can tell you this much, the family is TIRED of watching what's happening on this thread. That I do know on good authority.

Also, this is for hotshot. I recall who began the first acting out against SM way back at the beginning of this and it was you and Ringo. Some of us foolishly let you plant half-truth's in our heads and/or make us doubt the intent of some who never deserved that. You have one outrageous audacity to state it's SM creating all of the issues now.

Some of us remember the history and I would think after four years of you inserting yourself as the super sleuth above all others to the degree that Dave won't even give you his phone number, that you could buy a clue !

I will repeat, the family is not happy to see all of these drive-by attacks and if you respect them, you will respect their feelings and the intent of this forum to support Natalee above all else.

KEEPTHEFAITH


Thank-you nonesuche (via KTF) 

AMEN!


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #797 1/30/09 - 2/1/09
Post by: klaasend on February 01, 2009, 02:21:44 PM
I am just driving by.

We stopped home after the church service for a quick bite and ... will be taking off the Vancouver International shortly.

Have a good day Monkeys!!

Janet
11:15 AM PT

Muffy,San.Can we pull out the little pick car for Janet? ::MonkeyHaHa::

(http://i118.photobucket.com/albums/o100/klaasen3/Sub5/MonkeyDriveBy.gif)


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #797 1/30/09 - 2/1/09
Post by: Magnolia on February 01, 2009, 02:23:32 PM
I am just driving by.

We stopped home after the church service for a quick bite and ... will be taking off the Vancouver International shortly.

Have a good day Monkeys!!

Janet
11:15 AM PT

Ugh! another drive-by.

Have a good day, Janet.   Bet you can't wait to kiss those babies.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #797 1/30/09 - 2/1/09
Post by: Keepthefaith on February 01, 2009, 02:24:00 PM
I am just driving by.

We stopped home after the church service for a quick bite and ... will be taking off the Vancouver International shortly.

Have a good day Monkeys!!

Janet
11:15 AM PT

Muffy,San.Can we pull out the little pick car for Janet? ::MonkeyHaHa::

(http://i118.photobucket.com/albums/o100/klaasen3/Sub5/MonkeyDriveBy.gif)

Look at Janet Go....... ::MonkeyDance:: ::MonkeyDance:: ::MonkeyDance::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #797 1/30/09 -
Post by: WhiskeyGirl on February 01, 2009, 02:25:18 PM
I remain firm in my belief that the truth starts and ends in Aruba.  Can't get much simpler than than.

All fingers still pointing at the can of worms opened in Aruba long before Natalee disappeared...

The can, the can opener, the worms, the bodily fluids...the attempts to at cleanup and coverup continue...

I believe the truth is still out there, in the watery graveyard surrounding Aruba.

Insist on the truth.

just my humble opinions




Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #797 1/30/09 - 2/1/09
Post by: MuffyBee on February 01, 2009, 02:25:18 PM
Have a great trip Janet!  (http://bestsmileys.com/waving/5.gif)  Hurry back!


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #797 1/30/09 - 2/1/09
Post by: texasmom on February 01, 2009, 02:30:21 PM
I am just driving by.

We stopped home after the church service for a quick bite and ... will be taking off the Vancouver International shortly.

Have a good day Monkeys!!

Janet
11:15 AM PT

Muffy,San.Can we pull out the little pick car for Janet? ::MonkeyHaHa::

(http://i118.photobucket.com/albums/o100/klaasen3/Sub5/MonkeyDriveBy.gif)

Look at Janet Go....... ::MonkeyDance:: ::MonkeyDance:: ::MonkeyDance::

I surely never thought I'd see Janet and drive by used in relation to each other here! 

Wonders never cease!   ::MonkeyHaHa::

Now Janet don't squeeze the breath out of those kids and grandkids...remember...gentle hugs...!

Have a wonderful day!   ::MonkeyDance::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #797 1/30/09 - 2/1/09
Post by: texasmom on February 01, 2009, 02:34:22 PM


Thanks for the reminders KTF!   ::MonkeyWink::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #797 1/30/09 -
Post by: nimrod on February 01, 2009, 02:36:20 PM
Im sitting here crying my eyes out..I know that the family must be sooo hurting for all the fighting and bickering...Poor Natalee up in heaven looking down at us...Please lets all try and get along and stick to getting JUSTICE for NATALEE and her family...Ids was at the travel show on her feet all day along with 9 others being Natalees voice...handing out brocheres and prayer cards telling Natalee story...I dont want to get in the middle of who is right and who is wrong, cause I know we all love Natalee...but please lets all just try and get along for the sake of the family..I admire everyone who is still fighting to get answers no matter how its done....Alot has happened in almost 4 years...but we are all still here trying to help..I just love you all and want answers as I know you all do to...anyway, the BOYCOTT TRAVEL SHOW was a HUGE success and pictures will be forth coming....got to run but PEACE to you all....


Vickie, thanks for all you do.

Nimrod

1. Actually, I believe the Freebirds contacted Kyle first and it was about the time the search was over.
2. The last thing I heard was that Beth didn't want the Freebirds to release any negative comments about the Persistence.
3. Actually Kyle said he "thought" they were human remains. Afterall, he only had the same photos that we all were looking at, so it was Kyle's opinion only.
4. We have never heard Tim Miller's side of when and why he left the Persistence. I received a very nice thank you letter from Tim for my donation to the Persistence's search for Natalee a couple of weeks after Tim "abruptly" left.
5. I think Kermit's words are all out of context. It reminds me of the same liberal tactics that were used to remove a republican president from office.  lol


KEEPTHEFAITH ::MonkeyWink::

KTF, just so you know, I am not a member of cng and it is not my intent to be a drive by. Everything I stated above was just my own personal opinion and I still stick to it.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #797 1/30/09 - 2/1/09
Post by: Tamikosmom on February 01, 2009, 02:41:54 PM
I am just driving by.

We stopped home after the church service for a quick bite and ... will be taking off the Vancouver International shortly.

Have a good day Monkeys!!

Janet
11:15 AM PT

Muffy,San.Can we pull out the little pick car for Janet? ::MonkeyHaHa::

(http://i118.photobucket.com/albums/o100/klaasen3/Sub5/MonkeyDriveBy.gif)

My blond wig!!!!  It flew off in the wind!!!

 ::MonkeyWaa::

Janet



Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #797 1/30/09 - 2/1/09
Post by: Lifesong on February 01, 2009, 02:42:10 PM

I'm up to page 39 and just wanted to get this in before the thread closes:


Go Anna!

 ::MonkeyCool::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #797 1/30/09 - 2/1/09
Post by: texasmom on February 01, 2009, 02:43:40 PM
(http://i21.photobucket.com/albums/b258/texasmom55/Natalee/Natalee_Holloway.jpg)

TRUTH & JUSTICE FOR NATALEE!!!!


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #797 1/30/09 - 2/1/09
Post by: texasmom on February 01, 2009, 02:44:35 PM
I am just driving by.

We stopped home after the church service for a quick bite and ... will be taking off the Vancouver International shortly.

Have a good day Monkeys!!

Janet
11:15 AM PT

Muffy,San.Can we pull out the little pick car for Janet? ::MonkeyHaHa::

(http://i118.photobucket.com/albums/o100/klaasen3/Sub5/MonkeyDriveBy.gif)

My blond wig!!!!  It flew off in the wind!!!

 ::MonkeyWaa::

Janet



 ::MonkeyHaHa::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #797 1/30/09 - 2/1/09
Post by: wreck on February 01, 2009, 02:50:17 PM
I am just driving by.

We stopped home after the church service for a quick bite and ... will be taking off the Vancouver International shortly.

Have a good day Monkeys!!

Janet
11:15 AM PT

Muffy,San.Can we pull out the little pick car for Janet? ::MonkeyHaHa::

(http://i118.photobucket.com/albums/o100/klaasen3/Sub5/MonkeyDriveBy.gif)

My blond wig!!!!  It flew off in the wind!!!

 ::MonkeyWaa::

Janet



 ::MonkeyHaHa::
The Grandkids probably wouldn't recognize her with her wig anyways!!  ::MonkeyCool::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #797 1/30/09 -
Post by: Keepthefaith on February 01, 2009, 02:51:00 PM
Im sitting here crying my eyes out..I know that the family must be sooo hurting for all the fighting and bickering...Poor Natalee up in heaven looking down at us...Please lets all try and get along and stick to getting JUSTICE for NATALEE and her family...Ids was at the travel show on her feet all day along with 9 others being Natalees voice...handing out brocheres and prayer cards telling Natalee story...I dont want to get in the middle of who is right and who is wrong, cause I know we all love Natalee...but please lets all just try and get along for the sake of the family..I admire everyone who is still fighting to get answers no matter how its done....Alot has happened in almost 4 years...but we are all still here trying to help..I just love you all and want answers as I know you all do to...anyway, the BOYCOTT TRAVEL SHOW was a HUGE success and pictures will be forth coming....got to run but PEACE to you all....


Vickie, thanks for all you do.

Nimrod

1. Actually, I believe the Freebirds contacted Kyle first and it was about the time the search was over.
2. The last thing I heard was that Beth didn't want the Freebirds to release any negative comments about the Persistence.
3. Actually Kyle said he "thought" they were human remains. Afterall, he only had the same photos that we all were looking at, so it was Kyle's opinion only.
4. We have never heard Tim Miller's side of when and why he left the Persistence. I received a very nice thank you letter from Tim for my donation to the Persistence's search for Natalee a couple of weeks after Tim "abruptly" left.
5. I think Kermit's words are all out of context. It reminds me of the same liberal tactics that were used to remove a republican president from office.  lol


KEEPTHEFAITH ::MonkeyWink::

KTF, just so you know, I am not a member of cng and it is not my intent to be a drive by. Everything I stated above was just my own personal opinion and I still stick to it.


JEN

Hello Monekys,

Thank you Klaas for approving my membership.

I am the former Natalee's Freebirds Administrator.

To answer ldstlou - NO, I am not disgruntled.  No, I am no longer a member at that forum.  I resigned today.

That is an outstanding group of people, with hearts of gold.  I admire and respect each and every one of them.

It was merely time for me to move on.  I felt that we had achieved all we could there over the past 2 1/2 years, and all of the Freebirds - former and current - will always be in my heart.

Kermit did the right thing by making this information public at Beth Holloway's request  (albeit 2 months after she asked us to do so thanks to the need to avoid litigation).

I just simply couldn't stand by any longer and watch the continued confusion perpetrated by two particular posters here.  Whether it's been unintentional or deliberate - it really needs to stop now.

Wingnut made an excellent point - and I feel it's one that's been largely overlooked - pressure needs to be applied to get the answers as to what happened to the human remains Aruba recovered from that fishing cage.

Monkeys - you all are stellar at banding together and getting action.

The FBI can only do so much - with their limited jurisdiction.  They can speak to and subpoena from the members of the Persistence their statements and video to ascertain what was found.

Then it becomes an international issue.  Our State Department is where the encouragement is needed - to put pressure on the Hague to get to the bottom of this.

But something must be done.  Natalee's family has been through enough, and that they (and Natalee) were treated so shabbily by the one resource they felt they could trust is utterly heart wrenching.

Thank you Monkeys for allowing me to be here - let's help Natalee's family get some justice!






Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #797 1/30/09 - 2/1/09
Post by: texasmom on February 01, 2009, 02:52:44 PM
I am just driving by.

We stopped home after the church service for a quick bite and ... will be taking off the Vancouver International shortly.

Have a good day Monkeys!!

Janet
11:15 AM PT

Muffy,San.Can we pull out the little pick car for Janet? ::MonkeyHaHa::

(http://i118.photobucket.com/albums/o100/klaasen3/Sub5/MonkeyDriveBy.gif)

My blond wig!!!!  It flew off in the wind!!!

 ::MonkeyWaa::

Janet



 ::MonkeyHaHa::
The Grandkids probably wouldn't recognize her with her wig anyways!!  ::MonkeyCool::

True, but have you ever seen a lady's hair right after the wig comes off?   ::MonkeyEek::  ::MonkeyShocked::

Hopefully with the wind and a little help from a comb, she won't scare the kids!   ::MonkeyHaHa::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #797 1/30/09 - 2/1/09
Post by: crazybabyborg on February 01, 2009, 02:56:49 PM
My 2 cents for getting us to page 50:

Yes, we used to have a Monkey Bus, and Klaas and all had a great time with it. It was good for everybody IMO. It's wonderful to see it again.

In the spirit of that comraderie, I'm going to post the link to the Valentine Avatar Thread. You should all have an avatar for Valentine's Day there. If not, just leave me a post, and I'll be glad to make you one. The posters on this thread are still cared about and loved. You've got my heart, for sure! Lifesong, Magnolia, Wreck, and Vicki come to mind with just the recent posts.

That spirit is still here, along with a lot of love for each other. We just have to have a little road rage for the drive bys....... ::MonkeyHaHa::

http://scaredmonkeys.net/index.php?topic=4293.msg599211#msg599211

Go get your avis, if you want one!   ::MonkeyWink::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #797 1/30/09 - 2/1/09
Post by: klaasend on February 01, 2009, 02:59:16 PM
I have the thread change - my turn  ::MonkeyHaHa::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #797 1/30/09 -
Post by: nimrod on February 01, 2009, 02:59:38 PM
Im sitting here crying my eyes out..I know that the family must be sooo hurting for all the fighting and bickering...Poor Natalee up in heaven looking down at us...Please lets all try and get along and stick to getting JUSTICE for NATALEE and her family...Ids was at the travel show on her feet all day along with 9 others being Natalees voice...handing out brocheres and prayer cards telling Natalee story...I dont want to get in the middle of who is right and who is wrong, cause I know we all love Natalee...but please lets all just try and get along for the sake of the family..I admire everyone who is still fighting to get answers no matter how its done....Alot has happened in almost 4 years...but we are all still here trying to help..I just love you all and want answers as I know you all do to...anyway, the BOYCOTT TRAVEL SHOW was a HUGE success and pictures will be forth coming....got to run but PEACE to you all....


Vickie, thanks for all you do.

Nimrod

1. Actually, I believe the Freebirds contacted Kyle first and it was about the time the search was over.
2. The last thing I heard was that Beth didn't want the Freebirds to release any negative comments about the Persistence.
3. Actually Kyle said he "thought" they were human remains. Afterall, he only had the same photos that we all were looking at, so it was Kyle's opinion only.
4. We have never heard Tim Miller's side of when and why he left the Persistence. I received a very nice thank you letter from Tim for my donation to the Persistence's search for Natalee a couple of weeks after Tim "abruptly" left.
5. I think Kermit's words are all out of context. It reminds me of the same liberal tactics that were used to remove a republican president from office.  lol


KEEPTHEFAITH ::MonkeyWink::

KTF, just so you know, I am not a member of cng and it is not my intent to be a drive by. Everything I stated above was just my own personal opinion and I still stick to it.


JEN

Hello Monekys,

Thank you Klaas for approving my membership.

I am the former Natalee's Freebirds Administrator.

To answer ldstlou - NO, I am not disgruntled.  No, I am no longer a member at that forum.  I resigned today.

That is an outstanding group of people, with hearts of gold.  I admire and respect each and every one of them.

It was merely time for me to move on.  I felt that we had achieved all we could there over the past 2 1/2 years, and all of the Freebirds - former and current - will always be in my heart.

Kermit did the right thing by making this information public at Beth Holloway's request  (albeit 2 months after she asked us to do so thanks to the need to avoid litigation).

I just simply couldn't stand by any longer and watch the continued confusion perpetrated by two particular posters here.  Whether it's been unintentional or deliberate - it really needs to stop now.

Wingnut made an excellent point - and I feel it's one that's been largely overlooked - pressure needs to be applied to get the answers as to what happened to the human remains Aruba recovered from that fishing cage.

Monkeys - you all are stellar at banding together and getting action.

The FBI can only do so much - with their limited jurisdiction.  They can speak to and subpoena from the members of the Persistence their statements and video to ascertain what was found.

Then it becomes an international issue.  Our State Department is where the encouragement is needed - to put pressure on the Hague to get to the bottom of this.

But something must be done.  Natalee's family has been through enough, and that they (and Natalee) were treated so shabbily by the one resource they felt they could trust is utterly heart wrenching.

Thank you Monkeys for allowing me to be here - let's help Natalee's family get some justice!






I don't understand. Are you trying to make a point? Are you saying there is no room for another opinion here?


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #797 1/30/09 - 2/1/09
Post by: Magnolia on February 01, 2009, 02:59:56 PM
I was going to cheat....like Robots used to do.
I went to the new thread and waited, but nothing happened. ::MonkeyWaa::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #797 1/30/09 - 2/1/09
Post by: San on February 01, 2009, 03:00:41 PM
I was going to cheat....like Robots used to do.
I went to the new thread and waited, but nothing happened. ::MonkeyWaa::

Try again  ::MonkeyHaHa::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #797 1/30/09 - 2/1/09
Post by: hotping on February 01, 2009, 03:01:11 PM
I was going to cheat....like Robots used to do.
I went to the new thread and waited, but nothing happened. ::MonkeyWaa::
  ::MonkeyHaHa::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #797 1/30/09 - 2/1/09
Post by: texasmom on February 01, 2009, 03:01:27 PM
I was going to cheat....like Robots used to do.
I went to the new thread and waited, but nothing happened. ::MonkeyWaa::
::MonkeyHaHa::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #797 1/30/09 - 2/1/09
Post by: crazybabyborg on February 01, 2009, 03:02:00 PM
I was going to cheat....like Robots used to do.
I went to the new thread and waited, but nothing happened. ::MonkeyWaa::

(http://i25.photobucket.com/albums/c100/crazybabyborgs/Valentine%20Avatar/Robots-dancing.gif)

 ::MonkeyTongue::


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #797 1/30/09 -
Post by: Keepthefaith on February 01, 2009, 03:02:02 PM
Im sitting here crying my eyes out..I know that the family must be sooo hurting for all the fighting and bickering...Poor Natalee up in heaven looking down at us...Please lets all try and get along and stick to getting JUSTICE for NATALEE and her family...Ids was at the travel show on her feet all day along with 9 others being Natalees voice...handing out brocheres and prayer cards telling Natalee story...I dont want to get in the middle of who is right and who is wrong, cause I know we all love Natalee...but please lets all just try and get along for the sake of the family..I admire everyone who is still fighting to get answers no matter how its done....Alot has happened in almost 4 years...but we are all still here trying to help..I just love you all and want answers as I know you all do to...anyway, the BOYCOTT TRAVEL SHOW was a HUGE success and pictures will be forth coming....got to run but PEACE to you all....


Vickie, thanks for all you do.

Nimrod

1. Actually, I believe the Freebirds contacted Kyle first and it was about the time the search was over.
2. The last thing I heard was that Beth didn't want the Freebirds to release any negative comments about the Persistence.
3. Actually Kyle said he "thought" they were human remains. Afterall, he only had the same photos that we all were looking at, so it was Kyle's opinion only.
4. We have never heard Tim Miller's side of when and why he left the Persistence. I received a very nice thank you letter from Tim for my donation to the Persistence's search for Natalee a couple of weeks after Tim "abruptly" left.
5. I think Kermit's words are all out of context. It reminds me of the same liberal tactics that were used to remove a republican president from office.  lol


KEEPTHEFAITH ::MonkeyWink::

KTF, just so you know, I am not a member of cng and it is not my intent to be a drive by. Everything I stated above was just my own personal opinion and I still stick to it.


JEN

Hello Monekys,

Thank you Klaas for approving my membership.

I am the former Natalee's Freebirds Administrator.

To answer ldstlou - NO, I am not disgruntled.  No, I am no longer a member at that forum.  I resigned today.

That is an outstanding group of people, with hearts of gold.  I admire and respect each and every one of them.

It was merely time for me to move on.  I felt that we had achieved all we could there over the past 2 1/2 years, and all of the Freebirds - former and current - will always be in my heart.

Kermit did the right thing by making this information public at Beth Holloway's request  (albeit 2 months after she asked us to do so thanks to the need to avoid litigation).

I just simply couldn't stand by any longer and watch the continued confusion perpetrated by two particular posters here.  Whether it's been unintentional or deliberate - it really needs to stop now.

Wingnut made an excellent point - and I feel it's one that's been largely overlooked - pressure needs to be applied to get the answers as to what happened to the human remains Aruba recovered from that fishing cage.

Monkeys - you all are stellar at banding together and getting action.

The FBI can only do so much - with their limited jurisdiction.  They can speak to and subpoena from the members of the Persistence their statements and video to ascertain what was found.

Then it becomes an international issue.  Our State Department is where the encouragement is needed - to put pressure on the Hague to get to the bottom of this.

But something must be done.  Natalee's family has been through enough, and that they (and Natalee) were treated so shabbily by the one resource they felt they could trust is utterly heart wrenching.

Thank you Monkeys for allowing me to be here - let's help Natalee's family get some justice!






I don't understand. Are you trying to make a point? Are you saying there is no room for another opinion here?

Either Beth gave the OK to release the information or she didn't.All i can do is trust what i've been told.I believe she was fully aware.Do you?Yes or No.


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #797 1/30/09 - 2/1/09
Post by: texasmom on February 01, 2009, 03:02:19 PM
(http://i21.photobucket.com/albums/b258/texasmom55/Natalee/Natalee_Holloway.jpg)

TRUTH & JUSTICE FOR NATALEE!!!!


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #797 1/30/09 -
Post by: wreck on February 01, 2009, 03:02:26 PM
Im sitting here crying my eyes out..I know that the family must be sooo hurting for all the fighting and bickering...Poor Natalee up in heaven looking down at us...Please lets all try and get along and stick to getting JUSTICE for NATALEE and her family...Ids was at the travel show on her feet all day along with 9 others being Natalees voice...handing out brocheres and prayer cards telling Natalee story...I dont want to get in the middle of who is right and who is wrong, cause I know we all love Natalee...but please lets all just try and get along for the sake of the family..I admire everyone who is still fighting to get answers no matter how its done....Alot has happened in almost 4 years...but we are all still here trying to help..I just love you all and want answers as I know you all do to...anyway, the BOYCOTT TRAVEL SHOW was a HUGE success and pictures will be forth coming....got to run but PEACE to you all....


Vickie, thanks for all you do.

Nimrod

1. Actually, I believe the Freebirds contacted Kyle first and it was about the time the search was over.
2. The last thing I heard was that Beth didn't want the Freebirds to release any negative comments about the Persistence.
3. Actually Kyle said he "thought" they were human remains. Afterall, he only had the same photos that we all were looking at, so it was Kyle's opinion only.
4. We have never heard Tim Miller's side of when and why he left the Persistence. I received a very nice thank you letter from Tim for my donation to the Persistence's search for Natalee a couple of weeks after Tim "abruptly" left.
5. I think Kermit's words are all out of context. It reminds me of the same liberal tactics that were used to remove a republican president from office.  lol


KEEPTHEFAITH ::MonkeyWink::

KTF, just so you know, I am not a member of cng and it is not my intent to be a drive by. Everything I stated above was just my own personal opinion and I still stick to it.


JEN

Hello Monekys,

Thank you Klaas for approving my membership.

I am the former Natalee's Freebirds Administrator.

To answer ldstlou - NO, I am not disgruntled.  No, I am no longer a member at that forum.  I resigned today.

That is an outstanding group of people, with hearts of gold.  I admire and respect each and every one of them.

It was merely time for me to move on.  I felt that we had achieved all we could there over the past 2 1/2 years, and all of the Freebirds - former and current - will always be in my heart.

Kermit did the right thing by making this information public at Beth Holloway's request  (albeit 2 months after she asked us to do so thanks to the need to avoid litigation).

I just simply couldn't stand by any longer and watch the continued confusion perpetrated by two particular posters here.  Whether it's been unintentional or deliberate - it really needs to stop now.

Wingnut made an excellent point - and I feel it's one that's been largely overlooked - pressure needs to be applied to get the answers as to what happened to the human remains Aruba recovered from that fishing cage.

Monkeys - you all are stellar at banding together and getting action.

The FBI can only do so much - with their limited jurisdiction.  They can speak to and subpoena from the members of the Persistence their statements and video to ascertain what was found.

Then it becomes an international issue.  Our State Department is where the encouragement is needed - to put pressure on the Hague to get to the bottom of this.

But something must be done.  Natalee's family has been through enough, and that they (and Natalee) were treated so shabbily by the one resource they felt they could trust is utterly heart wrenching.

Thank you Monkeys for allowing me to be here - let's help Natalee's family get some justice!






I don't understand. Are you trying to make a point? Are you saying there is no room for another opinion here?
Of course you can have your opinion -- that was just a little "rebuttle". (sorry to speak for KTF)


Title: Re: Natalee Case Discussion #797 1/30/09 - 2/1/09
Post by: klaasend on February 01, 2009, 03:02:59 PM
(http://i118.photobucket.com/albums/o100/klaasen3/Sub5/moderator%20pics/MODLOCK1.gif)

Please move to NCD# 798

http://scaredmonkeys.net/index.php?topic=4466.0