Scared Monkeys Discussion Forum

Missing, Exploited and True Crime => Lindsey Baum - McCleary, WA 6/26/09 => Topic started by: MuffyBee on July 26, 2009, 08:16:54 PM



Title: Lindsey Baum #3 7/28/09 - 8/26/09
Post by: MuffyBee on July 26, 2009, 08:16:54 PM
(http://**/content/articles/2009/06/28/local_news/doc4a4709024546f677630834.jpg)
LINDSEY BAUM
MCCLEARY, WA
MISSING SINCE JUNE 26, 2009


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3
Post by: klaasend on July 28, 2009, 11:03:07 PM
Sorry about the early move but at the rate the last thread was going, I'd be up all night waiting on page 100  ::MonkeyHaHa::

I'm hoping this new search today brings us closer to finding Lindsey.


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3
Post by: MuffyBee on July 28, 2009, 11:23:45 PM
Sorry about the early move but at the rate the last thread was going, I'd be up all night waiting on page 100  ::MonkeyHaHa::

I'm hoping this new search today brings us closer to finding Lindsey.



I've been checking this thread on and off since late this afternoon myself...

I hope tomorrow is the day Lindsey is found.


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3
Post by: Sister on July 28, 2009, 11:35:11 PM
"It could happen!" from Angels in the Outfield


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3
Post by: doubledecker on July 29, 2009, 12:45:37 AM
kim c...

on your last post over on the other thread...

about checking the emails, etc, yes I do that sometimes too but I just never did it with adam as I had something else I was doing about him, and so hmmm on those. 

I know he has an AIM account somewhere, don't know what it is, really did not look but he has one.  I think it imight be an old one that has not been used in awhile. 

I am wondering if he hooked up with someone who is homeless and went with them here and there.  I am guessing, but it seems possible to me considering what I know. if that is the case, homeless people can be here one day and gone in the next, or in an hour etc.  just get in the car and drive to wherever, then come back again, who knows. 

what gets me is all this stuff going on in Roy and ft lewis.  too much stuff going on. 

I still am wondering about the white car.  It seems there were several people seeing this white car (I think), can't be sure but so the local rumor mill has it.  just stuff I am hearing from locals.  I hear a lot of things but you can't tell if the people really know or if someone is mistaken, a lot of conflicting stories coming out of mccleary.  one person says this, another says no that is not right, etc.  so I bet the police are getting some really messed up info, and then I am hearing there are people who will not tell the police anything, so hmmmm... so it is like people know things there, but either the right info is not getting to the police, or the police are not listening to some things, or there are people who know things and will not talk to the police.  so what a mess.


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3
Post by: doubledecker on July 29, 2009, 12:56:00 AM
KimC wrote:

Yes, these emails are attached to the address in Battle Ground, Washington.  300 SW 7th Ave. #505  Battle Ground.



300 SW 7th Ave. #505  Battle Ground

BATTLE GROUND, WA
VANCOUVER, WA
GREELEY, CO  he has a CO ip also hmmm

Possible Relatives:

CATT, WALTER R
CATT, KATHRYN L (Age 56)
ONEEL, SHAWNA M (Age 32)
CATT, BRADLEY M (Age 31)
RIDDELL, CANDY M (Age 42)
CATT, DELORES M

Possible Roommates / Associates:

DAVIS, JACKIE DISTEFANO (Age 83)
PHERNETTON, DANACRAFT L (Age 54)
CROSS, DANNY MARVIN (Age 59)
RODGERS, MARGARET L (Age 90)
SWALLING, JULIETTE E (Age 94)
 

hmmm this is the household for that address, I see also connected to colorado.  one of the ip's of adam routes through colorado, I did not really follow it to see why or what it was, maybe I should. 


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3
Post by: doubledecker on July 29, 2009, 12:57:34 AM
KimC wrote:

Yes, these emails are attached to the address in Battle Ground, Washington.  300 SW 7th Ave. #505  Battle Ground.


_____________________________
*****************************

this part from DD

300 SW 7th Ave. #505  Battle Ground

BATTLE GROUND, WA
VANCOUVER, WA
GREELEY, CO  he has a CO ip also hmmm

Possible Relatives:

CATT, WALTER R
CATT, KATHRYN L (Age 56)
ONEEL, SHAWNA M (Age 32)
CATT, BRADLEY M (Age 31)
RIDDELL, CANDY M (Age 42)
CATT, DELORES M

Possible Roommates / Associates:

DAVIS, JACKIE DISTEFANO (Age 83)
PHERNETTON, DANACRAFT L (Age 54)
CROSS, DANNY MARVIN (Age 59)
RODGERS, MARGARET L (Age 90)
SWALLING, JULIETTE E (Age 94)
 

hmmm this is the household for that address, I see also connected to colorado.  one of the ip's of adam routes through colorado, I did not really follow it to see why or what it was, maybe I should. 

edited to show what part I wrote


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3
Post by: doubledecker on July 29, 2009, 12:58:24 AM
oh and just to clarify this info,
colorado is not where he was 2 states away


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3
Post by: doubledecker on July 29, 2009, 12:59:01 AM
and now I wonder if he has disappeared? hmmm

I wonder if he is in jail?


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3
Post by: doubledecker on July 29, 2009, 01:04:35 AM
Name: Dana Moore Phernetton
Birth Date: Oct 1955
Phone Number: xxxxxxx
Address: 18952 Wisconsin Dr, Chippewa Falls, Wisconsin 54729-0201 (1993)
[Rr 8 Pob 193, Chippewa Falls, Wisconsin 54729-0101 (1989)]

I can't get those addresses to come up. 

looks like she is in WI at one time, so was the sex offender arrested out of montesaro, he was wanted out of WI....


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3
Post by: doubledecker on July 29, 2009, 01:12:18 AM
hmmm same address same dob
Name: Danette L Phernetton
Birth Date: Oct 1955
Address: 18952 Wisconsin Dr, Chippewa Falls, Wisconsin 54729-0901 (1993)

same address & phone
Name: Mark A Phernetton
Birth Date: May 1960
Phone Number:xxxxxx
Address: 18952 Wisconsin Dr, Chippewa Falls, Wisconsin 54729-1001 (1993)
[Rr 8 Pob 193d, Chippewa Falls, Wisconsin 54729-0401 (1993)]
[316 Waterloo Rd, Marshall, Wisconsin 53559] 


Name: Mark Phernetton
Address: 18952 72Nd Ave 
City: Chippewa Falls 
State: Wisconsin 
Zip Code: 54729-7317
Phone Number: zzzzzzzz
Residence Years: 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 

not one of these addresses are coming up. hmmm are they real addresses?  they must be, look how many years mark lived there.  wonder why I can't get them to come up?

how would adam be tied to these poeople I wonder?





Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3
Post by: doubledecker on July 29, 2009, 01:15:43 AM
PHERNETTON, MARK A (Age 49)

Associated names:

 PHERNE, MARK ALLEN
 PHERNETTON,  M
 CHIPPEWA FALLS, WI
CHIPPEWA FLS, WI
WEBSTER, WI
MARSHALL, WI

Possible Relatives:

PHERNETTON, DANETTE L (Age 53)

Possible Roommates / Associates:

MOORE, SETH T (Age 28)
SPRAGUE, ERIN N (Age 31)

oh crap I was punching in washington instead of wisconsin duh, let me try them again
 


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3
Post by: doubledecker on July 29, 2009, 01:20:15 AM
other places showing up with the above addresses

frisco CO
pheonix az

I'm not connecting up anywhere with adam yet



Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3
Post by: doubledecker on July 29, 2009, 01:22:23 AM
Wisconsin Marriages, 1973-1997
about Mark Allen Phernetton
Name: Mark Allen Phernetton  
Estimated Birth Year: 1960 
Age: 27 
Gender: M (Male) 
County of Residence: Burnett
Spouse: Danette Lavonne Moore  
Spouse's Estimated Birth Year: 1956 
Spouse's Age: 31 
Spouse's Gender: F (Female) 
Spouse's County of Residence: Eau Claire 
Marriage Date: 16 May 1987  
Marriage County: Polk 
Certificate Number: 006999 
Microfilm Roll Number: 21 
 


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3
Post by: doubledecker on July 29, 2009, 01:24:59 AM
Minnesota Birth Index, 1935-2002
about Mark Allen Phernetton
Name: Mark Allen Phernetton  
Birth Date: 14 May 1960
Birth County: Hennepin 
Father: Harold Lloyd Phernetton
Mother: Rosemarie De Mars  
File Number: 1960-MN-001352 
 


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3
Post by: doubledecker on July 29, 2009, 01:25:48 AM
Minnesota Birth Index, 1935-2002
about Mark Allen Phernetton
Name: Mark Allen Phernetton  
Birth Date: 14 May 1960
Birth County: Hennepin 
Father: Harold Lloyd Phernetton
Mother: Rosemarie De Mars  
File Number: 1960-MN-001352


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3
Post by: doubledecker on July 29, 2009, 01:31:42 AM
mmm no ties to adam I can find yet, hmmm
how does he tie to these people? hmmm


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3
Post by: doubledecker on July 29, 2009, 01:43:42 AM
adam is tied to these through the same phone number

 YAKIMA, WA
KENNESAW, GA
COLUMBIA, MD
VIENNA, VA
CHATTANOOGA, TN
TAMPA, FL
CARRSVILLE, KY
BERRIEN SPRINGS, MI

Possible Relatives:

PATTERSON, GEOFFREY E (Age 44)
PATTERSON, GARY B (Age 71)



YAKIMA, WA
LIND, WA
PASCO, WA
GRANDVIEW, WA   

KENNESAW, GA
YAKIMA, WA
CHATTANOOGA, TN
COLUMBIA, MD
VIENNA, VA
READING, PA
SILVER SPRING, MD
TAMPA, FL
BERRIEN SPRINGS, MI
CARRSVILLE, KY

 Possible Relatives:

PATTERSON, ALICIA W (Age 44)
PATTERSON, GARY B (Age 71)
PATTERSON, RACHEL KATHRYN (Age 69)
 


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3
Post by: Kermit on July 29, 2009, 02:44:28 AM
When you go to the site that MamaMouse was referencing. You ONLY see this. I saw no man named Kermit. That frog photo is the sties logo. It does not state it is Kermit.

(http://img194.imageshack.us/img194/6526/frogsite.jpg)



NO link to Kermit's photos.  This link takes you to a photo that was uploaded and posted at SM.

It is not part of that WhiteHouse or alleged man standing there that is named Kermit as was implied.


http://img389.imageshack.us/i/shoeallcomparisonak2.jpg/?a=V&ci=0&rt=4

The reason I know that is because I do not have an image shack account. I do not live in that white house.



Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3
Post by: KarmaRoundUp on July 29, 2009, 07:47:50 AM
Good morning Monkeys

They may be searching again today.


Fresh eyes join search for missing girl.....

http://www.komonews.com/news/local/51941307.html





Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3
Post by: KimC on July 29, 2009, 09:02:32 AM
adam is tied to these through the same phone number

 YAKIMA, WA
KENNESAW, GA
COLUMBIA, MD
VIENNA, VA
CHATTANOOGA, TN
TAMPA, FL
CARRSVILLE, KY
BERRIEN SPRINGS, MI

Possible Relatives:

PATTERSON, GEOFFREY E (Age 44)
PATTERSON, GARY B (Age 71)



YAKIMA, WA
LIND, WA
PASCO, WA
GRANDVIEW, WA   

KENNESAW, GA
YAKIMA, WA
CHATTANOOGA, TN
COLUMBIA, MD
VIENNA, VA
READING, PA
SILVER SPRING, MD
TAMPA, FL
BERRIEN SPRINGS, MI
CARRSVILLE, KY

 Possible Relatives:

PATTERSON, ALICIA W (Age 44)
PATTERSON, GARY B (Age 71)
PATTERSON, RACHEL KATHRYN (Age 69)
 


Pasco, Washington?  Karl S. Goering, possibly?

I'm going to throw this out here for speculation.

What if Adam Lee Campbell did not create his own MS pages.  What if Adam Lee Campbell did not create this adamcampbell65@yahoo.com email address that is associated with this email address?  What if someone else, wanting to thwart attention away from himself, created all this as a diversion? This has been my theory all along.  Perhaps this is someone who Adam met in jail or someone who was not in jail but had knowledge or contact with him.  Perhaps through some sort of prison outreach?  We've talked about this before.  Elma?  What are some of the activities of the Evergreen Christian Community Church in McCleary? 

Perhaps, as you say, the people in McCleary are not saying what they know ?? Perhaps this is because the answer is right in front of their faces?   


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3
Post by: MuffyBee on July 29, 2009, 10:02:42 AM
Please say a prayer and light a candle for Lindsey, that she will be found.
http://www.gratefulness.org/candles/candles.cfm?l=eng&gi=FLB


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3
Post by: Tamikosmom on July 29, 2009, 10:07:21 AM
Good morning Monkeys

They may be searching again today.


Fresh eyes join search for missing girl.....

http://www.komonews.com/news/local/51941307.html


Thanks Karma.

One month too late.  IMO.

In the process of elimination ... homes and property within that two block stretch from home where Lindsey was witnessed by a neighbour should have been searched at the getgo.  Residents should of been considered persons of interest and brought in for questioning.

In the process of elimination ... the home and property of Melissa Baum should have been search at the getgo.  When you consider the revealed dynamics encompassing Lindsey's brother ... Josh Baum should have been considered a person of interest and brought in for questioning.

In the process of elimination ... the home and property of Wayne Watnee should have been searched at the getgo.  When you consider where this man resides in relation to the the Baum residence and ... his connection to both Linsey and Josh ... this man should have been considered a person of interest and brought in for questioning.

It is my prayer that behind the scenes the respective questionings and searches did take place and ... were not reported.

Janet

++++++

Fresh eyes join search for missing girl
Story Published: Jul 28, 2009 at 5:55 PM PDT
Story Updated: Jul 28, 2009 at 6:15 PM PDT

 
By Luke Duecy  Watch the story MCCLEARY, Wash. -- It's been more than a month since Lindsey Baum disappeared while walking home from a friend's house, but investigators are not giving up.

On Tuesday, detectives from Pierce County joined the search, hoping to turn up new leads or tips in the case.

They searched homes, trash cans and crawl spaces near where Lindsey was last seen, and cadaver-sniffing dogs were also brought in to comb the area

http://www.komonews.com/news/local/51941307.html


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3
Post by: Tamikosmom on July 29, 2009, 10:10:24 AM
Ockham's Razor

You must never fail to adopt the simplest idea as your working hypothesis. If necessity demands, you can dump it later when you have more data, but only because it is no longer the simplest idea" or "entities should not be multiplied beyond necessity


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3
Post by: no rose colored glasses on July 29, 2009, 10:11:49 AM
Ockham's Razor

You must never fail to adopt the simplest idea as your working hypothesis. If necessity demands, you can dump it later when you have more data, but only because it is no longer the simplest idea" or "entities should not be multiplied beyond necessity

  ::MonkeyCool::


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3
Post by: sunshine12 on July 29, 2009, 10:37:03 AM
Ockham's Razor

You must never fail to adopt the simplest idea as your working hypothesis. If necessity demands, you can dump it later when you have more data, but only because it is no longer the simplest idea" or "entities should not be multiplied beyond necessity


i agree, i really enjoy reading your posts and i really like when you remind us of the ockham's razor!  i will be very suprised if they don't find something within the mccleary town limits


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3
Post by: Fanny Mae on July 29, 2009, 10:52:22 AM
Ockham's Razor

You must never fail to adopt the simplest idea as your working hypothesis. If necessity demands, you can dump it later when you have more data, but only because it is no longer the simplest idea" or "entities should not be multiplied beyond necessity


You know I agree with you on this. The answer to this is not going to be complicated. The simplest questions have to be answered first, and then move out in concentric circles to a more far reaching investigation. This seems not to have been done, and much time has already been wasted with days of no searching or investigation.  ::MonkeyNoNo::


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3
Post by: Tamikosmom on July 29, 2009, 11:08:57 AM
Ockham's Razor

You must never fail to adopt the simplest idea as your working hypothesis. If necessity demands, you can dump it later when you have more data, but only because it is no longer the simplest idea" or "entities should not be multiplied beyond necessity


You know I agree with you on this. The answer to this is not going to be complicated. The simplest questions have to be answered first, and then move out in concentric circles to a more far reaching investigation. This seems not to have been done, and much time has already been wasted with days of no searching or investigation.  ::MonkeyNoNo::

I agree.

Is it incompetence or ...

 ::MonkeyNoNo::

Janet


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3
Post by: rebelgirl901 on July 29, 2009, 12:10:03 PM
Ockham's Razor

You must never fail to adopt the simplest idea as your working hypothesis. If necessity demands, you can dump it later when you have more data, but only because it is no longer the simplest idea" or "entities should not be multiplied beyond necessity


You know I agree with you on this. The answer to this is not going to be complicated. The simplest questions have to be answered first, and then move out in concentric circles to a more far reaching investigation. This seems not to have been done, and much time has already been wasted with days of no searching or investigation.  ::MonkeyNoNo::

I agree.

Is it incompetence or ...

 ::MonkeyNoNo::

Janet


Either these are the most inept l.e. in the state OR they already have an idea what happened to Lindsey and are not saying OR they are covering for someone.  Which is it? I don't know.

This is just crazy.  She did not vanish without a trace.  If the dogs did not pick up a scent, they need to get new dogs.  These dogs are trained for this kind of thing.  There has to be a scent.  They are not telling what they know.  IMO


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3
Post by: Northern Rose on July 29, 2009, 12:17:17 PM
Reader comments:

Misha2  ·  31 minutes ago

There is a little boy missing out in Boise,Idaho. His name is Robert Manwill. Does anyone out there believe that they might be connected? Robert went missing on Friday July 24,2009 and Lindsey went missing on June 26,2009 it was also a Friday.The authorities are checking along Interstate 84 and it runs all the way into Clark County,Washington.I hope and pray that both children will be found.

http://www.komonews.com/news/local/51941307.html


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3
Post by: no rose colored glasses on July 29, 2009, 12:26:39 PM
Reader comments:

Misha2  ·  31 minutes ago

There is a little boy missing out in Boise,Idaho. His name is Robert Manwill. Does anyone out there believe that they might be connected? Robert went missing on Friday July 24,2009 and Lindsey went missing on June 26,2009 it was also a Friday.The authorities are checking along Interstate 84 and it runs all the way into Clark County,Washington.I hope and pray that both children will be found.

http://www.komonews.com/news/local/51941307.html
I've been following the case of this little guy, and I personally don't think there is any connection.


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3
Post by: no rose colored glasses on July 29, 2009, 12:27:57 PM
Ockham's Razor

You must never fail to adopt the simplest idea as your working hypothesis. If necessity demands, you can dump it later when you have more data, but only because it is no longer the simplest idea" or "entities should not be multiplied beyond necessity


You know I agree with you on this. The answer to this is not going to be complicated. The simplest questions have to be answered first, and then move out in concentric circles to a more far reaching investigation. This seems not to have been done, and much time has already been wasted with days of no searching or investigation.  ::MonkeyNoNo::

I agree.

Is it incompetence or ...

 ::MonkeyNoNo::

Janet


Either these are the most inept l.e. in the state OR they already have an idea what happened to Lindsey and are not saying OR they are covering for someone.  Which is it? I don't know.

This is just crazy.  She did not vanish without a trace.  If the dogs did not pick up a scent, they need to get new dogs.  These dogs are trained for this kind of thing.  There has to be a scent.  They are not telling what they know.  IMO
I hope you are right, and LE is not telling what they know, otherwise I hate to say this, but it looks like a botched case right from the start.


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3
Post by: sherip on July 29, 2009, 12:44:04 PM
I do not know how to bring posts from previous threads in to this one so if someone could help I'd appreciate it.  There is a photo of the Northwest Life Center in Elma under the "Weirdos Connected to the Churches and Strange Going ons"  Page 3

The church is "White" and the reader board says "he came to set the captives free"  Could this have anything to do with Adam Campbells messages?  Also, the reason I was looking there was at one point there was discussion of a SO ex police officer that was living up by Hood Canal - this was talked about when George Woodard and Michael Feezer were being looked at - does anyone remember who that person was or where that would be in all of this information?


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3
Post by: Fanny Mae on July 29, 2009, 12:54:57 PM
I do not know how to bring posts from previous threads in to this one so if someone could help I'd appreciate it.  There is a photo of the Northwest Life Center in Elma under the "Weirdos Connected to the Churches and Strange Going ons"  Page 3

The church is "White" and the reader board says "he came to set the captives free"  Could this have anything to do with Adam Campbells messages?  Also, the reason I was looking there was at one point there was discussion of a SO ex police officer that was living up by Hood Canal - this was talked about when George Woodard and Michael Feezer were being looked at - does anyone remember who that person was or where that would be in all of this information?


Is this what you wanted?

(http://i715.photobucket.com/albums/ww157/Fannymae65/whitehousechurch.jpg)



Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3
Post by: Fanny Mae on July 29, 2009, 12:57:36 PM
When a "Cold Case" detective takes a look at one of his cases, he goes right back to the VERY BEGINNING. This certainly seems like a cold case as no real movement has been made.


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3
Post by: Fanny Mae on July 29, 2009, 12:58:56 PM
http://scaredmonkeys.net/index.php?topic=5683.40

This is the page that I got the picture I posted above.


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3
Post by: doubledecker on July 29, 2009, 01:09:56 PM
from the above article
On Tuesday, detectives from Pierce County joined the search, hoping to turn up new leads or tips in the case.

They searched homes, trash cans and crawl spaces near where Lindsey was last seen, and cadaver-sniffing dogs were also brought in to comb the area

______________________________________

why if the feds have been there before, would they need the pierce county LE to turn up new leads?  hmmm  sounds like to me that pierce couty might have already had some leads and now they are involved in this case.  why would you just pick out some other county to come over to dig up leads.  Wouldn't that be saying that Grays Harbor County can't do the job, or the feds did not do the job? 

I don't believe they brought them in just because they wanted someone else to come find leads.  I personally really have to wonder if there is some tie to this case in Pierce County and now they are part of the case. 

Also we see from the above article they did have cadaver dogs there, IF the article got it right?  you just never know about the news..


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3
Post by: doubledecker on July 29, 2009, 01:24:23 PM

snip

Pasco, Washington?  Karl S. Goering, possibly?

I'm going to throw this out here for speculation.

What if Adam Lee Campbell did not create his own MS pages.  What if Adam Lee Campbell did not create this adamcampbell65@yahoo.com email address that is associated with this email address?  What if someone else, wanting to thwart attention away from himself, created all this as a diversion? This has been my theory all along.  Perhaps this is someone who Adam met in jail or someone who was not in jail but had knowledge or contact with him.  Perhaps through some sort of prison outreach?  We've talked about this before.  Elma?  What are some of the activities of the Evergreen Christian Community Church in McCleary? 

Perhaps, as you say, the people in McCleary are not saying what they know ?? Perhaps this is because the answer is right in front of their faces?   

I believe it is adam who is using that email account.  I do believe he is the one who posted the posts to lindsey's guestbook.  I have other info that just about sums that up for sure.  Now he might be posting what someone else is telling him to post, that is possible yes, and I had wondered that as well.  But for certain, that is ADAM talking on that email and the guestbook.  I'm pretty positive of that. So much so I will say I am 100% positive that is adam on that email.  He might be posting what someone else tells him to post, but it is him for sure.  I know this because I have more info than those 2 posts on her guestbook.  Which I can't post the other info on here.

now adam was convicted in 1995. he is 31, he would have been approx. 17 at the time. I wonder how long he went to jail, or prison, or did he get probation?  I honestly believe if he has connections to someone else it is out of the homeless community or some kind of place which houses the homeless or sex offenders.  IF that was him connected to someone who has lindsey, we could very well be looking for some homeless sex offender, but this person might have never been caught, therefore, is not in the system for sex offenses. 

On the other hand what if they were paid to go pick her up from someone?  that's a possibility.  And that could very well be why pierce county is involved.  but that is just a bunch of "what if's" about pierce county involvement.  It's a very possible "theory", one I will not discount at all, and one I am really wondering about.  I would guess adam might be the kind of person who could get talked into doing something really stupid!  just my take on him.


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3
Post by: doubledecker on July 29, 2009, 01:25:11 PM
grrr on above post.  I do not know how to snip and quote and post. ugh I always get it in the wrong place


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3
Post by: doubledecker on July 29, 2009, 01:27:11 PM

snip

KIMC

Pasco, Washington?  Karl S. Goering, possibly?

I'm going to throw this out here for speculation.

What if Adam Lee Campbell did not create his own MS pages.  What if Adam Lee Campbell did not create this adamcampbell65@yahoo.com email address that is associated with this email address?  What if someone else, wanting to thwart attention away from himself, created all this as a diversion? This has been my theory all along.  Perhaps this is someone who Adam met in jail or someone who was not in jail but had knowledge or contact with him.  Perhaps through some sort of prison outreach?  We've talked about this before.  Elma?  What are some of the activities of the Evergreen Christian Community Church in McCleary? 

Perhaps, as you say, the people in McCleary are not saying what they know ?? Perhaps this is because the answer is right in front of their faces?   

DOUBLEDECKER

I believe it is adam who is using that email account.  I do believe he is the one who posted the posts to lindsey's guestbook.  I have other info that just about sums that up for sure.  Now he might be posting what someone else is telling him to post, that is possible yes, and I had wondered that as well.  But for certain, that is ADAM talking on that email and the guestbook.  I'm pretty positive of that. So much so I will say I am 100% positive that is adam on that email.  He might be posting what someone else tells him to post, but it is him for sure.  I know this because I have more info than those 2 posts on her guestbook.  Which I can't post the other info on here.

now adam was convicted in 1995. he is 31, he would have been approx. 17 at the time. I wonder how long he went to jail, or prison, or did he get probation?  I honestly believe if he has connections to someone else it is out of the homeless community or some kind of place which houses the homeless or sex offenders.  IF that was him connected to someone who has lindsey, we could very well be looking for some homeless sex offender, but this person might have never been caught, therefore, is not in the system for sex offenses. 

On the other hand what if they were paid to go pick her up from someone?  that's a possibility.  And that could very well be why pierce county is involved.  but that is just a bunch of "what if's" about pierce county involvement.  It's a very possible "theory", one I will not discount at all, and one I am really wondering about.  I would guess adam might be the kind of person who could get talked into doing something really stupid!  just my take on him.

gee I have me saying what kimc said, and her saying what I said, let me edit to add who said what.


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3
Post by: Artcolley on July 29, 2009, 01:28:04 PM
When you go to the site that MamaMouse was referencing. You ONLY see this. I saw no man named Kermit. That frog photo is the sties logo. It does not state it is Kermit.

(http://img194.imageshack.us/img194/6526/frogsite.jpg)



NO link to Kermit's photos.  This link takes you to a photo that was uploaded and posted at SM.

It is not part of that WhiteHouse or alleged man standing there that is named Kermit as was implied.


http://img389.imageshack.us/i/shoeallcomparisonak2.jpg/?a=V&ci=0&rt=4

The reason I know that is because I do not have an image shack account. I do not live in that white house.



Kermit

May I ask where you saw this from MamaMouse?
You DO know who MamaMouse is, don't you?

Shades of GM and banned ex-monkeys?

 ::MonkeyNoNo::


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3
Post by: no rose colored glasses on July 29, 2009, 02:04:39 PM
I'm confused who is MamaMouse?  ::MonkeyConfused::


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3
Post by: Haddie McFaddies Mom on July 29, 2009, 02:07:38 PM

[/quote]

Is this what you wanted?

(http://i715.photobucket.com/albums/ww157/Fannymae65/whitehousechurch.jpg)


[/quote]

You sure this wasn't hanging outside the Courthouse, because by the look of things, it's a revolving door up there on Repeats, SO's and the like  ~

( & with continuous budget cuts, it's not going to get any better ) ::MonkeyNoNo::

Try & have a good day Monkey's  ::MonkeyAngel::



Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3
Post by: Leroy on July 29, 2009, 02:10:20 PM
I'm confused who is MamaMouse?  ::MonkeyConfused::

Me too NoRose....i'm confused about the whole post actually...did someone really think Kermit lived in that house?   ::MonkeyEek::    ::MonkeyConfused:: 





Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3
Post by: no rose colored glasses on July 29, 2009, 02:11:02 PM
I'm confused who is MamaMouse?  ::MonkeyConfused::

Me too NoRose....i'm confused about the whole post actually...did someone really think Kermit lived in that house?   ::MonkeyEek::    ::MonkeyConfused:: 




  ::MonkeyConfused::  I don't know


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3
Post by: Fanny Mae on July 29, 2009, 02:17:27 PM
I'm confused who is MamaMouse?  ::MonkeyConfused::

Me too NoRose....i'm confused about the whole post actually...did someone really think Kermit lived in that house?   ::MonkeyEek::    ::MonkeyConfused:: 




  ::MonkeyConfused::  I don't know

I am not sure this is where this should be discussed. JMO


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3
Post by: Leroy on July 29, 2009, 02:24:17 PM


I am not sure this is where this should be discussed. JMO

I know Fanny - I'm not dwelling on it really....i was just confused by the post but dont think it has anything to do with Lindsey.

I am just patiently waiting for news on Lindsey....and praying that the news will be she has been found safe and alive.


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3
Post by: sherip on July 29, 2009, 02:27:23 PM


Is this what you wanted?

(http://i715.photobucket.com/albums/ww157/Fannymae65/whitehousechurch.jpg)


[/quote]

You sure this wasn't hanging outside the Courthouse, because by the look of things, it's a revolving door up there on Repeats, SO's and the like  ~

( & with continuous budget cuts, it's not going to get any better ) ::MonkeyNoNo::

Try & have a good day Monkey's  ::MonkeyAngel::


[/quote]
Yes it was thank you Haddie McFaddies mom!


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3
Post by: MuffyBee on July 29, 2009, 02:27:35 PM
THIS POST FROM KLAAS IN OTHER LINDSEY THREAD ABOUT THIS SUBJECT:

Kermit has nothing to do with Washington or the white house

You happened upon Kermit's image shack account is all

Drop the subject of Kermit now in the Lindsey threads, it has nothing to do with Lindsey







I can see that Kermit has posted since Klaas posted this.  And Kermit says she doesn't have an image shack account.  But the bottom line is:  Kermit has nothing to do with this Lindsey's case, so no reason for discussion here.


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3
Post by: AZSunny on July 29, 2009, 02:33:03 PM
Are there additional searches going on today?    I can't find anything on the news.


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3
Post by: Leroy on July 29, 2009, 02:34:25 PM
Interesting article - nothing new though

Search for missing girl continues, more publicity is needed

http://www.lakestevensjournal.com/editorial/article.exm/2009-07-28_search_for_missing_girl_continues__more_publicity_is_needed


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3
Post by: Artcolley on July 29, 2009, 02:38:54 PM
Muffy.  
Feel free to delete my post.
I saw that  post and responded.
Sorry, won't do THAT again, lol

Carry on


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3
Post by: MuffyBee on July 29, 2009, 02:43:12 PM
Muffy.  
Feel free to delete my post.
I saw that  post and responded.
Sorry, won't do THAT again, lol

Carry on

Art~  I'm sorry, I can't delete your post.  It's best left for Klaas. 


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3
Post by: MuffyBee on July 29, 2009, 02:47:57 PM
Let's all get back to finding Lindsey  ::MonkeyAngel::

(http://**/content/articles/2009/06/28/local_news/doc4a4709024546f677630834.jpg)


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3
Post by: Leroy on July 29, 2009, 02:49:56 PM
Are there additional searches going on today?    I can't find anything on the news.

AZSunny - I am not sure but I would hope so.  I cant find any news either   ::MonkeyWaa:: 


Hi Muffy!


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3
Post by: MuffyBee on July 29, 2009, 02:56:04 PM
Are there additional searches going on today?    I can't find anything on the news.

AZSunny - I am not sure but I would hope so.  I cant find any news either   ::MonkeyWaa:: 


Hi Muffy!

Good afternoon Leroy. 


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3
Post by: KimC on July 29, 2009, 03:08:41 PM

snip

KIMC

Pasco, Washington?  Karl S. Goering, possibly?

I'm going to throw this out here for speculation.

What if Adam Lee Campbell did not create his own MS pages.  What if Adam Lee Campbell did not create this adamcampbell65@yahoo.com email address that is associated with this email address?  What if someone else, wanting to thwart attention away from himself, created all this as a diversion? This has been my theory all along.  Perhaps this is someone who Adam met in jail or someone who was not in jail but had knowledge or contact with him.  Perhaps through some sort of prison outreach?  We've talked about this before.  Elma?  What are some of the activities of the Evergreen Christian Community Church in McCleary? 

Perhaps, as you say, the people in McCleary are not saying what they know ?? Perhaps this is because the answer is right in front of their faces?   

DOUBLEDECKER

I believe it is adam who is using that email account.  I do believe he is the one who posted the posts to lindsey's guestbook.  I have other info that just about sums that up for sure.  Now he might be posting what someone else is telling him to post, that is possible yes, and I had wondered that as well.  But for certain, that is ADAM talking on that email and the guestbook.  I'm pretty positive of that. So much so I will say I am 100% positive that is adam on that email.  He might be posting what someone else tells him to post, but it is him for sure.  I know this because I have more info than those 2 posts on her guestbook.  Which I can't post the other info on here.

now adam was convicted in 1995. he is 31, he would have been approx. 17 at the time. I wonder how long he went to jail, or prison, or did he get probation?  I honestly believe if he has connections to someone else it is out of the homeless community or some kind of place which houses the homeless or sex offenders.  IF that was him connected to someone who has lindsey, we could very well be looking for some homeless sex offender, but this person might have never been caught, therefore, is not in the system for sex offenses. 

On the other hand what if they were paid to go pick her up from someone?  that's a possibility.  And that could very well be why pierce county is involved.  but that is just a bunch of "what if's" about pierce county involvement.  It's a very possible "theory", one I will not discount at all, and one I am really wondering about.  I would guess adam might be the kind of person who could get talked into doing something really stupid!  just my take on him.

gee I have me saying what kimc said, and her saying what I said, let me edit to add who said what.

Okay, well if there's a way to mess this "quote" up again, I will be the one to do it.   :smt100

I am bringing this back since we got a little off track.  Yes, these are all possible theories, and I suppose we could chase them.  There were sure alot of SO's and others homeless in Yakima.  You pointed that out before.  Lot's of SO's there.  Is there a way to search "release dates" for the SO's in Washington? 

I do have a feeling that it's someone, as you say "anyone" who he made contact with in prison or on the streets of Yakima.  We just have to put that together.

The other thing I am going to ask again.....What are the activities of the Evergreen Christian Community Church/McCleary Campus?  On Pine? 

As I said before, if we spent all that time on the Elma church and their goings on, let's talk a little about the Evergreen in McCleary.  I am still wondering if one of the first reports of Lindsey didn't connect her with this church initially.  The report said the Evergreen Christian Center in McCleary.  And I think it's this one.  Prison outreach?  Possibly?  Anyone? 

Thanks in advance.


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3
Post by: Kermit on July 29, 2009, 03:10:10 PM

May I ask where you saw this from MamaMouse?
You DO know who MamaMouse is, don't you?

Shades of GM and banned ex-monkeys?

I meant the other mama that posted the photo.
Guess I had mamamouse on my mind for some odd reason.  ::MonkeyWink::


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3
Post by: doubledecker on July 29, 2009, 03:24:08 PM

snip

KIMC

Pasco, Washington?  Karl S. Goering, possibly?

I'm going to throw this out here for speculation.

What if Adam Lee Campbell did not create his own MS pages.  What if Adam Lee Campbell did not create this adamcampbell65@yahoo.com email address that is associated with this email address?  What if someone else, wanting to thwart attention away from himself, created all this as a diversion? This has been my theory all along.  Perhaps this is someone who Adam met in jail or someone who was not in jail but had knowledge or contact with him.  Perhaps through some sort of prison outreach?  We've talked about this before.  Elma?  What are some of the activities of the Evergreen Christian Community Church in McCleary? 

Perhaps, as you say, the people in McCleary are not saying what they know ?? Perhaps this is because the answer is right in front of their faces?   

DOUBLEDECKER

I believe it is adam who is using that email account.  I do believe he is the one who posted the posts to lindsey's guestbook.  I have other info that just about sums that up for sure.  Now he might be posting what someone else is telling him to post, that is possible yes, and I had wondered that as well.  But for certain, that is ADAM talking on that email and the guestbook.  I'm pretty positive of that. So much so I will say I am 100% positive that is adam on that email.  He might be posting what someone else tells him to post, but it is him for sure.  I know this because I have more info than those 2 posts on her guestbook.  Which I can't post the other info on here.

now adam was convicted in 1995. he is 31, he would have been approx. 17 at the time. I wonder how long he went to jail, or prison, or did he get probation?  I honestly believe if he has connections to someone else it is out of the homeless community or some kind of place which houses the homeless or sex offenders.  IF that was him connected to someone who has lindsey, we could very well be looking for some homeless sex offender, but this person might have never been caught, therefore, is not in the system for sex offenses. 

On the other hand what if they were paid to go pick her up from someone?  that's a possibility.  And that could very well be why pierce county is involved.  but that is just a bunch of "what if's" about pierce county involvement.  It's a very possible "theory", one I will not discount at all, and one I am really wondering about.  I would guess adam might be the kind of person who could get talked into doing something really stupid!  just my take on him.

gee I have me saying what kimc said, and her saying what I said, let me edit to add who said what.

Okay, well if there's a way to mess this "quote" up again, I will be the one to do it.   :smt100

I am bringing this back since we got a little off track.  Yes, these are all possible theories, and I suppose we could chase them.  There were sure alot of SO's and others homeless in Yakima.  You pointed that out before.  Lot's of SO's there.  Is there a way to search "release dates" for the SO's in Washington? 

I do have a feeling that it's someone, as you say "anyone" who he made contact with in prison or on the streets of Yakima.  We just have to put that together.

The other thing I am going to ask again.....What are the activities of the Evergreen Christian Community Church/McCleary Campus?  On Pine? 

As I said before, if we spent all that time on the Elma church and their goings on, let's talk a little about the Evergreen in McCleary.  I am still wondering if one of the first reports of Lindsey didn't connect her with this church initially.  The report said the Evergreen Christian Center in McCleary.  And I think it's this one.  Prison outreach?  Possibly?  Anyone? 

Thanks in advance.

well we are both messing this quote thing all up... Quote and snip lessons for us anyone LOL 

okay hopefully I post this one correctly.  I am not going to try to snip this one LOL

remember that adam also had a ROY, wa address.  on 6th street, I have the address somewhere.  on that street are several other sex offenders.  I would like to know what that street is like, are there a lot of homeless hanging out there, maybe a mission, motels, etc?  a bit park for homeless hangout, a food bank, halfway houses?  adam used this street as an address at one time.  this is right there at the Roy highway and ft lewis.  This is where the lady said she saw two guys with lindsey.  then she positively 100% id'd adam campbell as one of them.  as far as I know she is still sure of this in her own mind.  The police interviewed adam... he has a solid tight alibi the day lindsey disappeared, the day after and several days before and had been living two states away as of june 19th.  But.... where was he AFTER june 27th?  was he actually back in Roy(where he had an address) on the day the lady saw the two men with who she says is lindsey.  did he go there and then back out of state later?  It's possible for sure.  Did I ask, NO, am I going to, NO LOL, but can I wonder, yes LOL

so what if he hooked up with some homeless people from Roy and went out of state and then back to roy on the day the lady says she saw him.  What if adam had nothing to do with "taking' lindsey but when he sees all this stuff on the news, he posts on her guestbook trying to tell someone some info?  what if he does know something.  maybe he got to thinking he better tell?  maybe he didn't have a clue who she was at the time?  remember he is deaf maybe she tried to tell him and he could not understand her at the time.  maybe he thought she was the daughter of the guy?  heck who knows.  but for some reason he posted on her guestbook trying to give someone some info.  No telling what he told the police when the interviewed him.  hopefully he really did have some info and told them and it helped.  think about it, Pierce county is now in mccleary.  and Roy wa is in pierce county.


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3
Post by: doubledecker on July 29, 2009, 03:25:09 PM
haha, I am not quoting that message post again LOL, for some reason it keeps putting everything new up in the quote.  LOL


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3
Post by: KimC on July 29, 2009, 03:29:17 PM

snip

KIMC

Pasco, Washington?  Karl S. Goering, possibly?

I'm going to throw this out here for speculation.

What if Adam Lee Campbell did not create his own MS pages.  What if Adam Lee Campbell did not create this adamcampbell65@yahoo.com email address that is associated with this email address?  What if someone else, wanting to thwart attention away from himself, created all this as a diversion? This has been my theory all along.  Perhaps this is someone who Adam met in jail or someone who was not in jail but had knowledge or contact with him.  Perhaps through some sort of prison outreach?  We've talked about this before.  Elma?  What are some of the activities of the Evergreen Christian Community Church in McCleary? 

Perhaps, as you say, the people in McCleary are not saying what they know ?? Perhaps this is because the answer is right in front of their faces?   

DOUBLEDECKER

I believe it is adam who is using that email account.  I do believe he is the one who posted the posts to lindsey's guestbook.  I have other info that just about sums that up for sure.  Now he might be posting what someone else is telling him to post, that is possible yes, and I had wondered that as well.  But for certain, that is ADAM talking on that email and the guestbook.  I'm pretty positive of that. So much so I will say I am 100% positive that is adam on that email.  He might be posting what someone else tells him to post, but it is him for sure.  I know this because I have more info than those 2 posts on her guestbook.  Which I can't post the other info on here.

now adam was convicted in 1995. he is 31, he would have been approx. 17 at the time. I wonder how long he went to jail, or prison, or did he get probation?  I honestly believe if he has connections to someone else it is out of the homeless community or some kind of place which houses the homeless or sex offenders.  IF that was him connected to someone who has lindsey, we could very well be looking for some homeless sex offender, but this person might have never been caught, therefore, is not in the system for sex offenses. 

On the other hand what if they were paid to go pick her up from someone?  that's a possibility.  And that could very well be why pierce county is involved.  but that is just a bunch of "what if's" about pierce county involvement.  It's a very possible "theory", one I will not discount at all, and one I am really wondering about.  I would guess adam might be the kind of person who could get talked into doing something really stupid!  just my take on him.

gee I have me saying what kimc said, and her saying what I said, let me edit to add who said what.

Okay, well if there's a way to mess this "quote" up again, I will be the one to do it.   :smt100

I am bringing this back since we got a little off track.  Yes, these are all possible theories, and I suppose we could chase them.  There were sure alot of SO's and others homeless in Yakima.  You pointed that out before.  Lot's of SO's there.  Is there a way to search "release dates" for the SO's in Washington? 

I do have a feeling that it's someone, as you say "anyone" who he made contact with in prison or on the streets of Yakima.  We just have to put that together.

The other thing I am going to ask again.....What are the activities of the Evergreen Christian Community Church/McCleary Campus?  On Pine? 

As I said before, if we spent all that time on the Elma church and their goings on, let's talk a little about the Evergreen in McCleary.  I am still wondering if one of the first reports of Lindsey didn't connect her with this church initially.  The report said the Evergreen Christian Center in McCleary.  And I think it's this one.  Prison outreach?  Possibly?  Anyone? 

Thanks in advance.


So, maybe while he was in ROY?
Auburn (part), Bonney Lake, Buckley, Carbonado, DuPont, Eatonville, Edgewood, Enumclaw (part), Fife, Fircrest, Gig Harbor, Lakewood, Milton (part), Orting, Pacific (part), Puyallup, Roy, Ruston, South Prairie, Steilacoom, Sumner, Tacoma, University Place, and Wilkeson.


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3
Post by: doubledecker on July 29, 2009, 03:33:36 PM
I HAVE to find adam campbells birthdate. 

should be 1978 .. I thought I had it and now can't find it.  I really really really need his birthdate.  if I have that I can find some other info I really realy really need. ugh.


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3
Post by: KarmaRoundUp on July 29, 2009, 03:35:07 PM
This says they have a search center set up.


If you are interested in volunteering the center will be opening up early next week at 211 Simpson St. in McCleary. All volunteer searchers must be 18 or older with ID. Anyone younger or with kids are welcome to pass out and distribute flyers or ask at center if there is any other way to assist.

http://www.lindseybaum.com/donations
 



Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3
Post by: doubledecker on July 29, 2009, 03:38:57 PM
is this a key word
TROBULE
and what might that be

another thing he does is keeps SMILE LAUGH  CLEAR 

these are key words

do they mean anything?:  I don't know


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3
Post by: Lovinlife on July 29, 2009, 03:41:52 PM
is this a key word
TROBULE
and what might that be

another thing he does is keeps SMILE LAUGH  CLEAR 

these are key words

do they mean anything?:  I don't know
CLEAR=McCleary ???


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3
Post by: doubledecker on July 29, 2009, 03:44:39 PM
This says they have a search center set up.


If you are interested in volunteering the center will be opening up early next week at 211 Simpson St. in McCleary. All volunteer searchers must be 18 or older with ID. Anyone younger or with kids are welcome to pass out and distribute flyers or ask at center if there is any other way to assist.

http://www.lindseybaum.com/donations
 



that is the building they "pulled" and "decided" not to "get involved"


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3
Post by: doubledecker on July 29, 2009, 03:46:17 PM
is this a key word
TROBULE
and what might that be

another thing he does is keeps SMILE LAUGH  CLEAR 

these are key words

do they mean anything?:  I don't know
CLEAR=McCleary ???

see you see that too, and I also see all this SMILE  as maybe Smiley. 

I just wanted to see what someone else thought.

I am telling you he is coding stuff, but it's such a mess. 

maybe he is ONLY just talking like that.  I don't know.  LOL


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3
Post by: doubledecker on July 29, 2009, 03:46:54 PM
he will also say Clearly


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3
Post by: Leroy on July 29, 2009, 03:51:09 PM
I HAVE to find adam campbells birthdate. 

should be 1978 .. I thought I had it and now can't find it.  I really really really need his birthdate.  if I have that I can find some other info I really realy really need. ugh.

DD  - I found Adams DOB...it was in the last thread

         3922    M    i    Adam Campbell THOMPSON was born on 11 Jun 1978 in Tacoma, , Washington, USA.


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3
Post by: Lovinlife on July 29, 2009, 03:56:17 PM
is this a key word
TROBULE
and what might that be

another thing he does is keeps SMILE LAUGH  CLEAR 

these are key words

do they mean anything?:  I don't know
CLEAR=McCleary ???

see you see that too, and I also see all this SMILE  as maybe Smiley. 

I just wanted to see what someone else thought.

I am telling you he is coding stuff, but it's such a mess. 

maybe he is ONLY just talking like that.  I don't know.  LOL
I've been sparadically reading bits and pieces of this case, too hard to follow for me.  That just jumped straight out at me. I never even thought SMILE=Smiley!  I can only imagine what crap you're digging through. 

Where is Lindsey? :gaah:


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3
Post by: MuffyBee on July 29, 2009, 03:59:07 PM
http://www.ascdeaf.com/blog/?m=200608
<snip>
 An interpreter who is familiar with the concept of a “word salad’, for instance, would recognize a Deaf person’s incomprehensible string of words as a psychiatric symptom and be able to communicate this to the hearing professional. An interpreter with no prior exposure or knowledge of word salads, in contrast, might unintentionally try to “clean up” the Deaf person’s signing so that it makes sense to the hearing professional, unaware that an important psychiatric symptom is unconveyed in the process.
<snip>

Is Adam hearing impaired?  Or has a learning disability or communication problem?

Maybe his messages are a code, I don't know.  But I was also considering the above.


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3
Post by: doubledecker on July 29, 2009, 04:05:48 PM
I HAVE to find adam campbells birthdate. 

should be 1978 .. I thought I had it and now can't find it.  I really really really need his birthdate.  if I have that I can find some other info I really realy really need. ugh.

DD  - I found Adams DOB...it was in the last thread

         3922    M    i    Adam Campbell THOMPSON was born on 11 Jun 1978 in Tacoma, , Washington, USA.

that is not him leroy.  that is someone, someone found and had wondered if this was also adam campbell, but I don't think that is the same person.... it might be, but I just am thinking it isn't.  the thing is I have to be certain I have the right birthdate, or what I am trying to do will not work LOL   but thank you so much for trying to find that, you probably went to a lot of trouble searching for it ugh


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3
Post by: Leroy on July 29, 2009, 04:06:37 PM
http://www.ascdeaf.com/blog/?m=200608
<snip>
 An interpreter who is familiar with the concept of a “word salad’, for instance, would recognize a Deaf person’s incomprehensible string of words as a psychiatric symptom and be able to communicate this to the hearing professional. An interpreter with no prior exposure or knowledge of word salads, in contrast, might unintentionally try to “clean up” the Deaf person’s signing so that it makes sense to the hearing professional, unaware that an important psychiatric symptom is unconveyed in the process.
<snip>

Is Adam hearing impaired?  Or has a learning disability or communication problem?

Maybe his messages are a code, I don't know.  But I was also considering the above.

He is hearing impaired.  I cant decide if these messages are coded or not.


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3
Post by: doubledecker on July 29, 2009, 04:10:44 PM
http://www.ascdeaf.com/blog/?m=200608
<snip>
 An interpreter who is familiar with the concept of a “word salad’, for instance, would recognize a Deaf person’s incomprehensible string of words as a psychiatric symptom and be able to communicate this to the hearing professional. An interpreter with no prior exposure or knowledge of word salads, in contrast, might unintentionally try to “clean up” the Deaf person’s signing so that it makes sense to the hearing professional, unaware that an important psychiatric symptom is unconveyed in the process.
<snip>

Is Adam hearing impaired?  Or has a learning disability or communication problem?

Maybe his messages are a code, I don't know.  But I was also considering the above.

yes he is deaf.  and he does use an interpreter.  but we also have to remember, he posted on lindsey's guestbook saying he could help.  So he must at least THINK he has some information to help.  I asked someone at the grays harbor le if if it could turn out all gobbly gook if he were deaf, they said it could. 

see this is why I think it is a combination of his wording because he is deaf, and ALSO because he is trying to say something without saying it.  so there are two things going on here.  this is why it is so hard to figure out.  if it were ONLY coded, I think I could figure this out, but being we add to it that he is deaf and needs an interpreter, it really messes it all up.  Hopefully when the police communicated with him he told them what he knows.  he did not just go post on the lindsey guestbook just because he randomly found it and had nothing better to do... that is my thought


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3
Post by: canadianmonkey on July 29, 2009, 04:11:02 PM
http://www.ascdeaf.com/blog/?m=200608
<snip>
 An interpreter who is familiar with the concept of a “word salad’, for instance, would recognize a Deaf person’s incomprehensible string of words as a psychiatric symptom and be able to communicate this to the hearing professional. An interpreter with no prior exposure or knowledge of word salads, in contrast, might unintentionally try to “clean up” the Deaf person’s signing so that it makes sense to the hearing professional, unaware that an important psychiatric symptom is unconveyed in the process.
<snip>

Is Adam hearing impaired?  Or has a learning disability or communication problem?

Maybe his messages are a code, I don't know.  But I was also considering the above.

Yes MuffyBee.  On an earlier thread somewhere its listed on his SO page that he is hearing impaired.


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3
Post by: Leroy on July 29, 2009, 04:14:08 PM


that is not him leroy.  that is someone, someone found and had wondered if this was also adam campbell, but I don't think that is the same person.... it might be, but I just am thinking it isn't.  the thing is I have to be certain I have the right birthdate, or what I am trying to do will not work LOL   but thank you so much for trying to find that, you probably went to a lot of trouble searching for it ugh

no problem DD....i just want to your previous posts and should have read forward a bit.  Well that's one date in 1978 that we can rule out at least   ::MonkeyWink:: 

i will look some more


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3
Post by: mamacrazy30 on July 29, 2009, 04:15:19 PM
 if Lindsey has indeed been the Mcleary area the entire time, and if now they are really starting to search the area, would she still be there now?  who ever has had her Has had her for a month... ::MonkeyNoNo::


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3
Post by: doubledecker on July 29, 2009, 04:23:29 PM
adam is deaf and uses a phone relay interpreter. 


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3
Post by: A_News_Junkie_Monkey on July 29, 2009, 04:24:42 PM
DD - is this it?  Found this in last thread:
Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #2
Post by: JessStar on July 22, 2009, 12:23:19 PM
The following information was obtained from public records:

CAMPBELL, ADAM L
(DOB: 02/1978)
(Age: 31)


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3
Post by: rebelgirl901 on July 29, 2009, 04:27:56 PM
if Lindsey has indeed been the Mcleary area the entire time, and if now they are really starting to search the area, would she still be there now?  who ever has had her Has had her for a month... ::MonkeyNoNo::


Yes it is possible she has been in McCleary the whole time. I think that may be the reason some have not been very helpful in the searches or in providing information to L.E.  Somebody in that town knows what happened to Lindsey.  JMO


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3
Post by: doubledecker on July 29, 2009, 04:36:00 PM
DD - is this it?  Found this in last thread:
Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #2
Post by: JessStar on July 22, 2009, 12:23:19 PM
The following information was obtained from public records:

CAMPBELL, ADAM L
(DOB: 02/1978)
(Age: 31)


I bet that is it, did jessstar give an address with that, so I can be sure ... but she is usually "right on" with the dates connected to the addresses


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3
Post by: A_News_Junkie_Monkey on July 29, 2009, 04:42:47 PM
DD - is this it?  Found this in last thread:
Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #2
Post by: JessStar on July 22, 2009, 12:23:19 PM
The following information was obtained from public records:

CAMPBELL, ADAM L
(DOB: 02/1978)
(Age: 31)


I bet that is it, did jessstar give an address with that, so I can be sure ... but she is usually "right on" with the dates connected to the addresses

I bet she did, I just cut the DOB - let me go back and see!


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3
Post by: KimC on July 29, 2009, 04:47:34 PM
Okay DD, I am beginning this new thread.  I should've probably brought it over from Lindsey part 2, but I am going to throw a whole bunch of stuff out here. 

Let's start with Adam's address in Roy.  Let's assume he had a contact there.  I think he did.  I have a strong reason to believe that there's an association between Adam Campbell and this Karl Steven Goering.

This Karl Steven Goering character, an SO, operating under the radar in Kennewick right now. Non-Compliant.  A Karl S. Goering was a detective in Kennewick too, and I am suspecting that it was possibly his father.   I have a whole bunch of stuff on Karl S. Junior that I posted on Lindsey part 2.  Okay, now that Pierce is in McCleary, that brings us back to Roy, cause Roy is in that county.  Stay with me here, I Will get this out.  Just want to post some stats here again on Karl junior.   Address:  6102 Road 68, Kennewick, Wa.  I have the phone number.  Easy to find.  He married Theresa Ann Forzaglia on Dec 18, 2000.  Child support issues same year.  He's got MS page member #281491802.  Nothing there but a monkey playing a guitar (Is this a slam?)  Another MS member #364234353 with lots and lots of photos.  Born June 18, 1973.  Resembles Adam Lee Campbell, possibly.  Then he's got that fubar page too.  It's in the other thread.  Okay, this is background.

I work in reverse a lot of times.  So, I started in Roy and found that a Dwight Edward Goering used to live in Roy.  He lives in Moses Lake currently.  Address:  1025 Virginia St.  Moses Lake, Wa.  98837.  I have phone too but it's easy to find.  He's on MyLife (formerly Classmates.com I think).  Born September 4, 1962.  Wife Desiree lives at same address.  There's a Donna too, but I believe she lives elsewhere in Washington now. 

On MyLife, Dwight has three friends, one of whom is Theresa Goering in Kennewick, Karl S. Goering Jr's current wife. 

So, this may be Adam's connection from Roy in a round-about way.  I still need to do some snooping around in Roy. 

But, when all is said and done, I think we will find a string of suspects and a string of missing children.  Now, I haven't done this yet, but if we just CONSIDER the possibility that there's a connection here, perhaps the Code (such as it is) may make sense.  I don't know cause I haven't looked at it myself in while.  Do you have the whole message handy to post here again?

Anyway, just more stuff to consider.   :smt120


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3
Post by: A_News_Junkie_Monkey on July 29, 2009, 04:48:18 PM
DD - is this it?  Found this in last thread:
Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #2
Post by: JessStar on July 22, 2009, 12:23:19 PM
The following information was obtained from public records:

CAMPBELL, ADAM L
(DOB: 02/1978)
(Age: 31)


I bet that is it, did jessstar give an address with that, so I can be sure ... but she is usually "right on" with the dates connected to the addresses

I bet she did, I just cut the DOB - let me go back and see!

Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #2
Post by: JessStar on July 22, 2009, 12:23:19 PM
The following information was obtained from public records:

CAMPBELL, ADAM L
(DOB: 02/1978)
(Age: 31)

7104 314TH ST S
ROY, WA 98580-9712
PIERCE COUNTY
(03/2008-Current)   

708 W HOME AVE APT 4
SELAH, WA 98942-1007
YAKIMA COUNTY
(01/2009-01/2009)   

PO BOX 1563
YAKIMA, WA 98907-1563
YAKIMA COUNTY
(08/2005-04/2008)   

PO BOX 1209
YAKIMA, WA 98907-1209
YAKIMA COUNTY
(01/2008-01/2008)   

605 N 3RD ST APT 1
YAKIMA, WA 98901-2227
YAKIMA COUNTY
(07/2004-10/2005)   

807 S 14TH ST
YAKIMA, WA 98901-3345
YAKIMA COUNTY
(09/2002-06/2005)   

108 S 7TH AVE APT 3
YAKIMA, WA 98902-3374
YAKIMA COUNTY
(07/2002-09/2002)   

124 N 5TH AVE
PASCO, WA 99301-5512
FRANKLIN COUNTY
(04/2002-04/2002)
Social Services Facility   

505 EUCLID ST # 2
GRANDVIEW, WA 98930-1522
YAKIMA COUNTY
(12/2001-04/2002)   

720 N 15TH AVE APT 209
YAKIMA, WA 98902-1964
YAKIMA COUNTY
(10/2001-12/2001) 

211 S NACHES AVE APT 209
YAKIMA, WA 98901-4720
YAKIMA COUNTY
(07/2000-07/2000)   

109 E PHILLIPS RD BLDG E
LIND, WA 99341-9755
ADAMS COUNTY
(03/2000-03/2000)
 
 


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3
Post by: mamacrazy30 on July 29, 2009, 04:49:34 PM
if Lindsey has indeed been the Mcleary area the entire time, and if now they are really starting to search the area, would she still be there now?  who ever has had her Has had her for a month... ::MonkeyNoNo::


Yes it is possible she has been in McCleary the whole time. I think that may be the reason some have not been very helpful in the searches or in providing information to L.E.  Somebody in that town knows what happened to Lindsey.  JMO
so now that they know the heat is on, you think they would still have her in McCleary?


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3
Post by: KimC on July 29, 2009, 04:52:59 PM
Okay DD, I am beginning this new thread.  I should've probably brought it over from Lindsey part 2, but I am going to throw a whole bunch of stuff out here. 

Let's start with Adam's address in Roy.  Let's assume he had a contact there.  I think he did.  I have a strong reason to believe that there's an association between Adam Campbell and this Karl Steven Goering.

This Karl Steven Goering character, an SO, operating under the radar in Kennewick right now. Non-Compliant.  A Karl S. Goering was a detective in Kennewick too, and I am suspecting that it was possibly his father.   I have a whole bunch of stuff on Karl S. Junior that I posted on Lindsey part 2.  Okay, now that Pierce is in McCleary, that brings us back to Roy, cause Roy is in that county.  Stay with me here, I Will get this out.  Just want to post some stats here again on Karl junior.   Address:  6102 Road 68, Kennewick, WaThis should be Pasco Washington.  I have the phone number.  Easy to find.  He married Theresa Ann Forzaglia on Dec 18, 2000.  Child support issues same year.  He's got MS page member #281491802.  Nothing there but a monkey playing a guitar (Is this a slam?)  Another MS member #364234353 with lots and lots of photos.  Born June 18, 1973.  Resembles Adam Lee Campbell, possibly.  Then he's got that fubar page too.  It's in the other thread.  Okay, this is background.

I work in reverse a lot of times.  So, I started in Roy and found that a Dwight Edward Goering used to live in Roy.  He lives in Moses Lake currently.  Address:  1025 Virginia St.  Moses Lake, Wa.  98837.  I have phone too but it's easy to find.  He's on MyLife (formerly Classmates.com I think).  Born September 4, 1962.  Wife Desiree lives at same address.  There's a Donna too, but I believe she lives elsewhere in Washington now. 

On MyLife, Dwight has three friends, one of whom is Theresa Goering in Kennewick, Karl S. Goering Jr's current wife. 

So, this may be Adam's connection from Roy in a round-about way.  I still need to do some snooping around in Roy. 

But, when all is said and done, I think we will find a string of suspects and a string of missing children.  Now, I haven't done this yet, but if we just CONSIDER the possibility that there's a connection here, perhaps the Code (such as it is) may make sense.  I don't know cause I haven't looked at it myself in while.  Do you have the whole message handy to post here again?

Anyway, just more stuff to consider.   :smt120


I want to make a correction to my last post.  the current address for Karl Steven Goering Jr. is in Pasco, Washington.  Not Kennewick, just in case LE of some description in this area wants to pay this guy a visit.


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3
Post by: doubledecker on July 29, 2009, 05:01:13 PM
DD - is this it?  Found this in last thread:
Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #2
Post by: JessStar on July 22, 2009, 12:23:19 PM
The following information was obtained from public records:

CAMPBELL, ADAM L
(DOB: 02/1978)
(Age: 31)


I bet that is it, did jessstar give an address with that, so I can be sure ... but she is usually "right on" with the dates connected to the addresses

I bet she did, I just cut the DOB - let me go back and see!

Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #2
Post by: JessStar on July 22, 2009, 12:23:19 PM
The following information was obtained from public records:

CAMPBELL, ADAM L
(DOB: 02/1978)
(Age: 31)

7104 314TH ST S
ROY, WA 98580-9712
PIERCE COUNTY
(03/2008-Current)   

708 W HOME AVE APT 4
SELAH, WA 98942-1007
YAKIMA COUNTY
(01/2009-01/2009)   

PO BOX 1563
YAKIMA, WA 98907-1563
YAKIMA COUNTY
(08/2005-04/2008)   

PO BOX 1209
YAKIMA, WA 98907-1209
YAKIMA COUNTY
(01/2008-01/2008)   

605 N 3RD ST APT 1
YAKIMA, WA 98901-2227
YAKIMA COUNTY
(07/2004-10/2005)   

807 S 14TH ST
YAKIMA, WA 98901-3345
YAKIMA COUNTY
(09/2002-06/2005)   

108 S 7TH AVE APT 3
YAKIMA, WA 98902-3374
YAKIMA COUNTY
(07/2002-09/2002)   

124 N 5TH AVE
PASCO, WA 99301-5512
FRANKLIN COUNTY
(04/2002-04/2002)
Social Services Facility   

505 EUCLID ST # 2
GRANDVIEW, WA 98930-1522
YAKIMA COUNTY
(12/2001-04/2002)   

720 N 15TH AVE APT 209
YAKIMA, WA 98902-1964
YAKIMA COUNTY
(10/2001-12/2001) 

211 S NACHES AVE APT 209
YAKIMA, WA 98901-4720
YAKIMA COUNTY
(07/2000-07/2000)   

109 E PHILLIPS RD BLDG E
LIND, WA 99341-9755
ADAMS COUNTY
(03/2000-03/2000)
 
 

yes that is him, so feb 1978, gee wish they had the DAY, oh well maybe this will work LOL  I will try it . 


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3
Post by: JessStar on July 29, 2009, 05:03:38 PM
DD - is this it?  Found this in last thread:
Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #2
Post by: JessStar on July 22, 2009, 12:23:19 PM
The following information was obtained from public records:

CAMPBELL, ADAM L
(DOB: 02/1978)
(Age: 31)


I bet that is it, did jessstar give an address with that, so I can be sure ... but she is usually "right on" with the dates connected to the addresses

I bet she did, I just cut the DOB - let me go back and see!

Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #2
Post by: JessStar on July 22, 2009, 12:23:19 PM
The following information was obtained from public records:

CAMPBELL, ADAM L
(DOB: 02/1978)
(Age: 31)

7104 314TH ST S
ROY, WA 98580-9712
PIERCE COUNTY
(03/2008-Current)   

708 W HOME AVE APT 4
SELAH, WA 98942-1007
YAKIMA COUNTY
(01/2009-01/2009)   

PO BOX 1563
YAKIMA, WA 98907-1563
YAKIMA COUNTY
(08/2005-04/2008)   

PO BOX 1209
YAKIMA, WA 98907-1209
YAKIMA COUNTY
(01/2008-01/2008)   

605 N 3RD ST APT 1
YAKIMA, WA 98901-2227
YAKIMA COUNTY
(07/2004-10/2005)   

807 S 14TH ST
YAKIMA, WA 98901-3345
YAKIMA COUNTY
(09/2002-06/2005)   

108 S 7TH AVE APT 3
YAKIMA, WA 98902-3374
YAKIMA COUNTY
(07/2002-09/2002)   

124 N 5TH AVE
PASCO, WA 99301-5512
FRANKLIN COUNTY
(04/2002-04/2002)
Social Services Facility   

505 EUCLID ST # 2
GRANDVIEW, WA 98930-1522
YAKIMA COUNTY
(12/2001-04/2002)   

720 N 15TH AVE APT 209
YAKIMA, WA 98902-1964
YAKIMA COUNTY
(10/2001-12/2001) 

211 S NACHES AVE APT 209
YAKIMA, WA 98901-4720
YAKIMA COUNTY
(07/2000-07/2000)   

109 E PHILLIPS RD BLDG E
LIND, WA 99341-9755
ADAMS COUNTY
(03/2000-03/2000)
 
 

I'm pretty sure this is the right Adam Campbell.  He is hearing impaired.  And the 124 N. 5th Avenue, Pasco, WA address comes up as:

      SEWSCDHH Inc

            124 N 5th Ave

            Pasco                       WA     99301

            (509) 543-9644

            -Interpreter Services for Hearing Impaired Employees


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3
Post by: JessStar on July 29, 2009, 05:05:01 PM

 
 

I'm pretty sure this is the right Adam Campbell.  He is hearing impaired.  And the 124 N. 5th Avenue, Pasco, WA address comes up as:

      SEWSCDHH Inc

            124 N 5th Ave

            Pasco                       WA     99301

            (509) 543-9644

            -Interpreter Services for Hearing Impaired Employees


That's the Southeastern Washington Service Center of the Deaf and Hard of Hearing


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3
Post by: doubledecker on July 29, 2009, 05:05:31 PM
Okay DD, I am beginning this new thread.  I should've probably brought it over from Lindsey part 2, but I am going to throw a whole bunch of stuff out here. 

Let's start with Adam's address in Roy.  Let's assume he had a contact there.  I think he did.  I have a strong reason to believe that there's an association between Adam Campbell and this Karl Steven Goering.

This Karl Steven Goering character, an SO, operating under the radar in Kennewick right now. Non-Compliant.  A Karl S. Goering was a detective in Kennewick too, and I am suspecting that it was possibly his father.   I have a whole bunch of stuff on Karl S. Junior that I posted on Lindsey part 2.  Okay, now that Pierce is in McCleary, that brings us back to Roy, cause Roy is in that county.  Stay with me here, I Will get this out.  Just want to post some stats here again on Karl junior.   Address:  6102 Road 68, Kennewick, WaThis should be Pasco Washington.  I have the phone number.  Easy to find.  He married Theresa Ann Forzaglia on Dec 18, 2000.  Child support issues same year.  He's got MS page member #281491802.  Nothing there but a monkey playing a guitar (Is this a slam?)  Another MS member #364234353 with lots and lots of photos.  Born June 18, 1973.  Resembles Adam Lee Campbell, possibly.  Then he's got that fubar page too.  It's in the other thread.  Okay, this is background.

I work in reverse a lot of times.  So, I started in Roy and found that a Dwight Edward Goering used to live in Roy.  He lives in Moses Lake currently.  Address:  1025 Virginia St.  Moses Lake, Wa.  98837.  I have phone too but it's easy to find.  He's on MyLife (formerly Classmates.com I think).  Born September 4, 1962.  Wife Desiree lives at same address.  There's a Donna too, but I believe she lives elsewhere in Washington now. 

On MyLife, Dwight has three friends, one of whom is Theresa Goering in Kennewick, Karl S. Goering Jr's current wife. 

So, this may be Adam's connection from Roy in a round-about way.  I still need to do some snooping around in Roy. 

But, when all is said and done, I think we will find a string of suspects and a string of missing children.  Now, I haven't done this yet, but if we just CONSIDER the possibility that there's a connection here, perhaps the Code (such as it is) may make sense.  I don't know cause I haven't looked at it myself in while.  Do you have the whole message handy to post here again?

Anyway, just more stuff to consider.   :smt120


I want to make a correction to my last post.  the current address for Karl Steven Goering Jr. is in Pasco, Washington.  Not Kennewick, just in case LE of some description in this area wants to pay this guy a visit.

maybe we need to start an adam campbell thread on this board.  I have one over on mine but we need one here to discuss with everyone here, I can organize over there and link back to here as we go. 

I started a thread here
Adam Lee Campbell Message & Connections ?
http://scaredmonkeys.net/index.php?topic=5816.new#new


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3
Post by: JessStar on July 29, 2009, 05:05:49 PM
Now I did it, DD!   ::MonkeyLaugh::

SWSCDHH is the Southeastern Washington Service Center of the Deaf and Hard of Hearing


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3
Post by: doubledecker on July 29, 2009, 05:08:53 PM
DD - is this it?  Found this in last thread:
Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #2
Post by: JessStar on July 22, 2009, 12:23:19 PM
The following information was obtained from public records:

CAMPBELL, ADAM L
(DOB: 02/1978)
(Age: 31)


I bet that is it, did jessstar give an address with that, so I can be sure ... but she is usually "right on" with the dates connected to the addresses

I bet she did, I just cut the DOB - let me go back and see!

Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #2
Post by: JessStar on July 22, 2009, 12:23:19 PM
The following information was obtained from public records:

CAMPBELL, ADAM L
(DOB: 02/1978)
(Age: 31)

7104 314TH ST S
ROY, WA 98580-9712
PIERCE COUNTY
(03/2008-Current)   

708 W HOME AVE APT 4
SELAH, WA 98942-1007
YAKIMA COUNTY
(01/2009-01/2009)   

PO BOX 1563
YAKIMA, WA 98907-1563
YAKIMA COUNTY
(08/2005-04/2008)   

PO BOX 1209
YAKIMA, WA 98907-1209
YAKIMA COUNTY
(01/2008-01/2008)   

605 N 3RD ST APT 1
YAKIMA, WA 98901-2227
YAKIMA COUNTY
(07/2004-10/2005)   

807 S 14TH ST
YAKIMA, WA 98901-3345
YAKIMA COUNTY
(09/2002-06/2005)   

108 S 7TH AVE APT 3
YAKIMA, WA 98902-3374
YAKIMA COUNTY
(07/2002-09/2002)   

124 N 5TH AVE
PASCO, WA 99301-5512
FRANKLIN COUNTY
(04/2002-04/2002)
Social Services Facility   

505 EUCLID ST # 2
GRANDVIEW, WA 98930-1522
YAKIMA COUNTY
(12/2001-04/2002)   

720 N 15TH AVE APT 209
YAKIMA, WA 98902-1964
YAKIMA COUNTY
(10/2001-12/2001) 

211 S NACHES AVE APT 209
YAKIMA, WA 98901-4720
YAKIMA COUNTY
(07/2000-07/2000)   

109 E PHILLIPS RD BLDG E
LIND, WA 99341-9755
ADAMS COUNTY
(03/2000-03/2000)
 
 

I'm pretty sure this is the right Adam Campbell.  He is hearing impaired.  And the 124 N. 5th Avenue, Pasco, WA address comes up as:

      SEWSCDHH Inc

            124 N 5th Ave

            Pasco                       WA     99301

            (509) 543-9644

            -Interpreter Services for Hearing Impaired Employees


yes that would be him. 


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3
Post by: KimC on July 29, 2009, 05:10:59 PM
Okay DD, I am beginning this new thread.  I should've probably brought it over from Lindsey part 2, but I am going to throw a whole bunch of stuff out here. 

Let's start with Adam's address in Roy.  Let's assume he had a contact there.  I think he did.  I have a strong reason to believe that there's an association between Adam Campbell and this Karl Steven Goering.

This Karl Steven Goering character, an SO, operating under the radar in Kennewick right now. Non-Compliant.  A Karl S. Goering was a detective in Kennewick too, and I am suspecting that it was possibly his father.   I have a whole bunch of stuff on Karl S. Junior that I posted on Lindsey part 2.  Okay, now that Pierce is in McCleary, that brings us back to Roy, cause Roy is in that county.  Stay with me here, I Will get this out.  Just want to post some stats here again on Karl junior.   Address:  6102 Road 68, Kennewick, WaThis should be Pasco Washington.  I have the phone number.  Easy to find.  He married Theresa Ann Forzaglia on Dec 18, 2000.  Child support issues same year.  He's got MS page member #281491802.  Nothing there but a monkey playing a guitar (Is this a slam?)  Another MS member #364234353 with lots and lots of photos.  Born June 18, 1973.  Resembles Adam Lee Campbell, possibly.  Then he's got that fubar page too.  It's in the other thread.  Okay, this is background.

I work in reverse a lot of times.  So, I started in Roy and found that a Dwight Edward Goering used to live in Roy.  He lives in Moses Lake currently.  Address:  1025 Virginia St.  Moses Lake, Wa.  98837.  I have phone too but it's easy to find.  He's on MyLife (formerly Classmates.com I think).  Born September 4, 1962.  Wife Desiree lives at same address.  There's a Donna too, but I believe she lives elsewhere in Washington now. 

On MyLife, Dwight has three friends, one of whom is Theresa Goering in Kennewick, Karl S. Goering Jr's current wife. 

So, this may be Adam's connection from Roy in a round-about way.  I still need to do some snooping around in Roy. 

But, when all is said and done, I think we will find a string of suspects and a string of missing children.  Now, I haven't done this yet, but if we just CONSIDER the possibility that there's a connection here, perhaps the Code (such as it is) may make sense.  I don't know cause I haven't looked at it myself in while.  Do you have the whole message handy to post here again?

Anyway, just more stuff to consider.   :smt120


I want to make a correction to my last post.  the current address for Karl Steven Goering Jr. is in Pasco, Washington.  Not Kennewick, just in case LE of some description in this area wants to pay this guy a visit.

And here's all the information on Dwight Edward Goering and all the places he's lived. 

1      Dwight Goering
Dwight E Goering
Dwight Ed Goering
Dwight Edward Goering
Dwight E Georing
   46
   Address Available    Phone Available    Moses Lake, WA
Roy, WA
Graham, WA
Spanaway, WA
Tahuya, WA
Tacoma, WA
Eatonville, WA
Kennewick, WA
Grandview, WA
   Desiree Lynne Goering
Desiree L Goering
Dwight Edward Goering


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3
Post by: doubledecker on July 29, 2009, 05:15:34 PM
Now I did it, DD!   ::MonkeyLaugh::

SWSCDHH is the Southeastern Washington Service Center of the Deaf and Hard of Hearing

oh hmmmm, so he has that address to them connected to HIM?  is that what this is?  ::MonkeyDevil::


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3
Post by: A_News_Junkie_Monkey on July 29, 2009, 05:15:52 PM
Now I did it, DD!   ::MonkeyLaugh::

SWSCDHH is the Southeastern Washington Service Center of the Deaf and Hard of Hearing

When I have something to add, I get excited and often don't think about finding the [/quote] and making sure I click behind it !  For anyone new, when you hit reply find this it will always be the last words typed already - click behind it and hit enter twice then type.  But, we all get in the quote boxes no matter how long we have been here.

Jess - where did you find that info of yours I posted?   Can you get a day for his DOB?  Is there one listed on any of the myspace or other social networking sites?


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3
Post by: doubledecker on July 29, 2009, 05:46:46 PM

 


I'm pretty sure this is the right Adam Campbell.  He is hearing impaired.  And the 124 N. 5th Avenue, Pasco, WA address comes up as:

      SEWSCDHH Inc

            124 N 5th Ave

            Pasco                       WA     99301

            (509) 543-9644

            -Interpreter Services for Hearing Impaired Employees



so what does this really mean, why is this address attached to him though, because he uses it?  as a way to go through to talk to him? or does he work there?


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3
Post by: doubledecker on July 29, 2009, 05:48:13 PM
kim ----

do you have the actuall addresses for Karl Steven Goering

if not I will go get them, maybe they have the exact same address at some point? 

trying to go through all your stuff and get familiar with it etc


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3
Post by: doubledecker on July 29, 2009, 05:54:37 PM
okay I got most of my info up on the new thread

http://scaredmonkeys.net/index.php?topic=5816.new#new


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3
Post by: doubledecker on July 29, 2009, 06:03:51 PM
kimc...

agree there very well could be many missing children tied to all of this.  it might very well be this is what adam was trying to say. I don't know yet, I am still trying to make sense out of what he is saying.

he might know a heck of a lot more than we ever imagine


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3
Post by: doubledecker on July 29, 2009, 06:38:21 PM
Name: Karl Steven Goering
Address: 505 S Olyumpia Mr, Kennewick, Washington 99336-0101 (1993)


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3
Post by: doubledecker on July 29, 2009, 06:38:47 PM
Name: Karl S Goering
Address: 4729 W Clearwater, Kennewick, Washington 99336-0101 (1993


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3
Post by: doubledecker on July 29, 2009, 06:39:31 PM
Name: Karl S Goering
Birth Date: 1962
Address: 9622 Maple Ln, Kennewick, Washington 99336-0501 (1993)
[823 S Everett, Kennewick, Washington 99336-0101 (1993)] 


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3
Post by: doubledecker on July 29, 2009, 06:40:30 PM
so far I am not finding anything connecting to adam.  other than dwight has a Roy address. 
but that just means I haven't found anything, does not mean there isn't one.  still lookig


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3
Post by: KarmaRoundUp on July 29, 2009, 07:14:09 PM
Reward produces wave of new tips in Baum case
BY JACOB JONES - The Daily World
Wednesday, July 29, 2009 12:12 PM PDT


Searchers returned to the streets of McCleary under a brutal sun Tuesday to follow-up on new leads in the hunt for 11-year-old Lindsey Baum.

Grays Harbor Undersheriff Rick Scott said about 25 officers and searchers with dogs braved near-record high temperatures to re-canvas areas of town.

“We’re out here sweating our guts out,” Scott said late Tuesday.

A recent $6,000 reward for information in the missing girl’s case has produced a new wave of tips for investigators to check out, Scott said. Surrounding law enforcement agencies including the Aberdeen Police Department, and Pierce and Thurston sheriff’s offices sent officers to help perform follow-up searches and interviews.

“We decided we’d try to reach out a bit,” Scott said.

About six core investigators have been leading the effort to find Lindsey, who disappeared while walking a few short blocks home on June 26. The detectives have found no evidence explaining the 4-foot-9, brown-haired girl’s disappearance, but they continue sorting through thousands of tips.

“I don’t want information sitting,” Scott said, explaining extra officers are helping check out tips as soon as possible.

So far, detectives have not found any clues to send the investigation in a “new direction,” Scott said, but they continue to consider all possibilities.
 

 


Officers and volunteers knocked on doors throughout town Tuesday, asking new questions and trying to reach people missed in previous interviews, he said. Investigators still hope to find the one small piece of information that can move the case forward.

“We were just going around talking to people,” Scott said, adding, “everybody’s just kind of worn out from the heat.”

Two teams with cadaver search dogs also roamed the town seeking any new scents, he said, but the hot conditions limited the available scents and quickly wore out the dogs.

“The heat really is so stifling,” he said.

Scott said detectives and extra officers expect to follow up on new tips in town for at least the rest of the week.

He asked anyone with any potentially helpful information to call the tip line at 1-866-915-8299.

http://**/articles/2009/07/29/local_news/doc4a708a0adde28983338062.txt



Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3
Post by: KarmaRoundUp on July 29, 2009, 07:15:12 PM
 ::MonkeySlide::  Hahaha!NEW!Monkey Slide!  ::MonkeySlide::


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3
Post by: doubledecker on July 29, 2009, 07:20:50 PM
Reward produces wave of new tips in Baum case
BY JACOB JONES - The Daily World
Wednesday, July 29, 2009 12:12 PM PDT


Searchers returned to the streets of McCleary under a brutal sun Tuesday to follow-up on new leads in the hunt for 11-year-old Lindsey Baum.

Grays Harbor Undersheriff Rick Scott said about 25 officers and searchers with dogs braved near-record high temperatures to re-canvas areas of town.

“We’re out here sweating our guts out,” Scott said late Tuesday.

A recent $6,000 reward for information in the missing girl’s case has produced a new wave of tips for investigators to check out, Scott said. Surrounding law enforcement agencies including the Aberdeen Police Department, and Pierce and Thurston sheriff’s offices sent officers to help perform follow-up searches and interviews.

“We decided we’d try to reach out a bit,” Scott said.

About six core investigators have been leading the effort to find Lindsey, who disappeared while walking a few short blocks home on June 26. The detectives have found no evidence explaining the 4-foot-9, brown-haired girl’s disappearance, but they continue sorting through thousands of tips.

“I don’t want information sitting,” Scott said, explaining extra officers are helping check out tips as soon as possible.

So far, detectives have not found any clues to send the investigation in a “new direction,” Scott said, but they continue to consider all possibilities.
 

 


Officers and volunteers knocked on doors throughout town Tuesday, asking new questions and trying to reach people missed in previous interviews, he said. Investigators still hope to find the one small piece of information that can move the case forward.

“We were just going around talking to people,” Scott said, adding, “everybody’s just kind of worn out from the heat.”

Two teams with cadaver search dogs also roamed the town seeking any new scents, he said, but the hot conditions limited the available scents and quickly wore out the dogs.

“The heat really is so stifling,” he said.

Scott said detectives and extra officers expect to follow up on new tips in town for at least the rest of the week.

He asked anyone with any potentially helpful information to call the tip line at 1-866-915-8299.

http://**/articles/2009/07/29/local_news/doc4a708a0adde28983338062.txt



I am sorry but the more articles which try to explain what they are doing, the more ridiculous they sound.  It is just me or our their explanations just stupid


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3
Post by: Haddie McFaddies Mom on July 29, 2009, 07:25:45 PM
LovinLife ~ That's it!  That's the little guy and the exact question that's been nagging at my heart and mind and eats at me from the time I open my eyes in the morning, stays with me throughout the motions of the day, and until I close my eyes at night. 

Where is Lindsey? :gaah:

Where is Lindsey? :gaah:

Where is Lindsey? :gaah:

Thank You !  ::MonkeyAngel::

Where is Lindsey? :gaah:

xoxo


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3
Post by: Fanny Mae on July 29, 2009, 07:36:28 PM
Ok, so they were doing a search yesterday. Does anyone know if they are searching in McCleary again today? Does anyone know if KaraK's home has been thoroughly searched? I know that it was said that Melissa's home had been searched. Have they gone to either place with cadaver dogs? Does anyone know?


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3
Post by: mamacrazy30 on July 29, 2009, 07:37:02 PM
Reward produces wave of new tips in Baum case
BY JACOB JONES - The Daily World
Wednesday, July 29, 2009 12:12 PM PDT


Searchers returned to the streets of McCleary under a brutal sun Tuesday to follow-up on new leads in the hunt for 11-year-old Lindsey Baum.

Grays Harbor Undersheriff Rick Scott said about 25 officers and searchers with dogs braved near-record high temperatures to re-canvas areas of town.

“We’re out here sweating our guts out,” Scott said late Tuesday.

A recent $6,000 reward for information in the missing girl’s case has produced a new wave of tips for investigators to check out, Scott said. Surrounding law enforcement agencies including the Aberdeen Police Department, and Pierce and Thurston sheriff’s offices sent officers to help perform follow-up searches and interviews.

“We decided we’d try to reach out a bit,” Scott said.

About six core investigators have been leading the effort to find Lindsey, who disappeared while walking a few short blocks home on June 26. The detectives have found no evidence explaining the 4-foot-9, brown-haired girl’s disappearance, but they continue sorting through thousands of tips.

“I don’t want information sitting,” Scott said, explaining extra officers are helping check out tips as soon as possible.

So far, detectives have not found any clues to send the investigation in a “new direction,” Scott said, but they continue to consider all possibilities.
 

 


Officers and volunteers knocked on doors throughout town Tuesday, asking new questions and trying to reach people missed in previous interviews, he said. Investigators still hope to find the one small piece of information that can move the case forward.

“We were just going around talking to people,” Scott said, adding, “everybody’s just kind of worn out from the heat.”

Two teams with cadaver search dogs also roamed the town seeking any new scents, he said, but the hot conditions limited the available scents and quickly wore out the dogs.

“The heat really is so stifling,” he said.

Scott said detectives and extra officers expect to follow up on new tips in town for at least the rest of the week.

He asked anyone with any potentially helpful information to call the tip line at 1-866-915-8299.

http://**/articles/2009/07/29/local_news/doc4a708a0adde28983338062.txt



I am sorry but the more articles which try to explain what they are doing, the more ridiculous they sound.  It is just me or our their explanations just stupid
its not just you


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3
Post by: Fanny Mae on July 29, 2009, 07:41:05 PM


I am sorry but the more articles which try to explain what they are doing, the more ridiculous they sound.  It is just me or our their explanations just stupid

I don't think the heat was quite as stifling in June as it is now. JMO


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3
Post by: doubledecker on July 29, 2009, 07:42:52 PM


I am sorry but the more articles which try to explain what they are doing, the more ridiculous they sound.  It is just me or our their explanations just stupid

I don't think the heat was quite as stifling in June as it is now. JMO

well I think the heat would make cadaver scent more detectable, not less?


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3
Post by: doubledecker on July 29, 2009, 07:44:22 PM
and they brought in all these other agencies so tips were not just sitting around?  and when did they get all these tips, JUST NOW all at the same time?  and because of the $6000.00 reward?  and it came out when?  and all the tips come NOW? 

sounds crazy to me


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3
Post by: mamacrazy30 on July 29, 2009, 07:44:52 PM
if Lindsey has been in McCleary the entire time...and now that whoever has had her, has had a month with her,...if she is still in McCleary, and now whoever has had her knows that the police are going door to door.....is it far fetched to say that she may not be in McCleary now....like today or yesterday moved????


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3
Post by: mamacrazy30 on July 29, 2009, 07:46:46 PM
maybe this new search for Lindsey is really a call of get your azz out of dodge they're on to ya?


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3
Post by: doubledecker on July 29, 2009, 07:47:00 PM
maybe I just tear things apart too much LOL

but my personal opinion is they are doing something they are not saying and they are trying to say they are doing it for other reasons because they don't want people to know.  All that if fine, but at least make it believeable  ::MonkeyDevil::


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3
Post by: KimC on July 29, 2009, 07:48:27 PM
so far I am not finding anything connecting to adam.  other than dwight has a Roy address. 
but that just means I haven't found anything, does not mean there isn't one.  still lookig

Yes, still looking, too, and trying to connect the dots.  In looking at every Goering and family, I came across this interesting site.  Since Adam seems to be familiar with where to go for help, thought maybe he wandered in one of these offices of the state.  It's the 2007 State of Washington Department of Social and Health Services.  And this particular website is a complete listing of all their employees.  And alphabetical too.  There are three Goerings listed and I have looked at all of them.  Just haven't connected the dots yet.  But here's the website in case some interesting names pop out at you.  2007 Arg, out of date, but these are state jobs so you might have people working there for many, many years.

http://lbloom.net/dshs07.html (http://lbloom.net/dshs07.html)



Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3
Post by: mamacrazy30 on July 29, 2009, 07:52:09 PM
maybe I just tear things apart too much LOL

but my personal opinion is they are doing something they are not saying and they are trying to say they are doing it for other reasons because they don't want people to know.  All that if fine, but at least make it believeable  ::MonkeyDevil::
i feel ya  ::MonkeySlide:: ::MonkeyDevil::


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3
Post by: doubledecker on July 29, 2009, 07:53:09 PM
if Lindsey has been in McCleary the entire time...and now that whoever has had her, has had a month with her,...if she is still in McCleary, and now whoever has had her knows that the police are going door to door.....is it far fetched to say that she may not be in McCleary now....like today or yesterday moved????

I am wondering if they have a suspect etc, and are going around showing that person's photo to people to see if anyone saw this person around anywhere? ??



Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3
Post by: mamacrazy30 on July 29, 2009, 07:54:49 PM
here is a thought...what if they have found lindsey, or they know where she is, but it would compromise someone/something and so now they are searching to 'discover her' when in fact they knew what was up the entire time..... ::MonkeyEek::


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3
Post by: mamacrazy30 on July 29, 2009, 07:56:26 PM
if Lindsey has been in McCleary the entire time...and now that whoever has had her, has had a month with her,...if she is still in McCleary, and now whoever has had her knows that the police are going door to door.....is it far fetched to say that she may not be in McCleary now....like today or yesterday moved????

I am wondering if they have a suspect etc, and are going around showing that person's photo to people to see if anyone saw this person around anywhere? ??


maybe???  i don't know, all i know is that it is hot in McCleary wa this time of year.


















Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3
Post by: no rose colored glasses on July 29, 2009, 08:02:19 PM
and they brought in all these other agencies so tips were not just sitting around?  and when did they get all these tips, JUST NOW all at the same time?  and because of the $6000.00 reward?  and it came out when?  and all the tips come NOW? 

sounds crazy to me
Sounds crazy to me also, and besides $6,000 reward is really not that much.


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3
Post by: doubledecker on July 29, 2009, 08:22:46 PM
and they brought in all these other agencies so tips were not just sitting around?  and when did they get all these tips, JUST NOW all at the same time?  and because of the $6000.00 reward?  and it came out when?  and all the tips come NOW? 

sounds crazy to me
Sounds crazy to me also, and besides $6,000 reward is really not that much.

I forget what date the reward was offered, but it has been over a week ago, so they are saying everyone with tips waited a week after the reward to give their tips?  now that makes no sense, so this tells me it is not the reward that brought in the tips and they bring in all the agencies so the tips don't sit there(their reason for the different agencies)

well, sorry it has been a week they would have sit there then, so that makes now sense.  that reward is not what brought in tips.  get real.  so Everyone sees the reward and waits over a week to call all at once hahahahaha   so they have to hurry up and go get all these agencies to help.. sure


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3
Post by: JessStar on July 29, 2009, 08:30:25 PM
Sorry I haven't had a chance to answer those questions earlier. First, with regard to the address for AC, typically the report I retrieve only reports addresses that were used or reported as being a residence. That's not to say AC lived there-it just means he reported it at one point as being his residence. Second, unfortunately none of the reports how the DAY of birth, only the month and year.

 


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3
Post by: A_News_Junkie_Monkey on July 29, 2009, 08:38:38 PM
Sorry I haven't had a chance to answer those questions earlier. First, with regard to the address for AC, typically the report I retrieve only reports addresses that were used or reported as being a residence. That's not to say AC lived there-it just means he reported it at one point as being his residence. Second, unfortunately none of the reports how the DAY of birth, only the month and year.

 

Thanks Jess.  Is the report you use a paid type search or one you can share? 


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3
Post by: AZSunny on July 29, 2009, 08:50:44 PM
and they brought in all these other agencies so tips were not just sitting around?  and when did they get all these tips, JUST NOW all at the same time?  and because of the $6000.00 reward?  and it came out when?  and all the tips come NOW? 

sounds crazy to me

We were just going around talking to people,” Scott said, adding, “everybody’s just kind of worn out from the heat.”

Well, that don't cut it sheriff.     He sounds like a beverly hillbilly.



Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3
Post by: pink angel on July 29, 2009, 08:57:38 PM
To be fair about the heat. The WA area has been experiencing a heatwave the past few days with temps soaring over 100 degrees.

It's tough to be out in that kind of heat any length of time. I don't care if you are cops or dogs. Even in a bathing suit it would be hard.



Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3
Post by: JessStar on July 29, 2009, 08:58:34 PM
It's a paid service.  The info I posted is gleaned directly from the report.


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3
Post by: doubledecker on July 29, 2009, 09:06:56 PM
Sorry I haven't had a chance to answer those questions earlier. First, with regard to the address for AC, typically the report I retrieve only reports addresses that were used or reported as being a residence. That's not to say AC lived there-it just means he reported it at one point as being his residence. Second, unfortunately none of the reports how the DAY of birth, only the month and year.

 

thanks jessstar..

well I can't find the DAY either, oh well I guess the month and year will work. 

I am wondering on the interpreter thing if he gives that address and phone number to get ahold of him so if he calls there to get the message it will be on some machine which interprets for him.  or... he could have given that as an address and phone number to get ahold of him, so he can understand his messages?  I don't know

or he just said he lived there LOL 

maybe he works there? or did. 



Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3
Post by: doubledecker on July 29, 2009, 09:09:55 PM
To be fair about the heat. The WA area has been experiencing a heatwave the past few days with temps soaring over 100 degrees.

It's tough to be out in that kind of heat any length of time. I don't care if you are cops or dogs. Even in a bathing suit it would be hard.



I know the heat is awful for anyone to be in and I am a total dog lover and would never want to see a dog out in that heat... but that is not what I am saying. 

they said the heat was making the scent hard to detect the cadaver scent.  that can't be true.  heat helps detect cadaver scent.  that is the point I was laughing about.  but I guess I just pick apart everything too much,  I just thought that was a crazy statement. 

but I do full well agree, the heat would be awful to be out in.  I feel badly for the people out in it and the dogs, especially the dogs. 


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3
Post by: AZSunny on July 29, 2009, 09:12:34 PM
To be fair about the heat. The WA area has been experiencing a heatwave the past few days with temps soaring over 100 degrees.

It's tough to be out in that kind of heat any length of time. I don't care if you are cops or dogs. Even in a bathing suit it would be hard.



I live in Arizona, it was 111 yesterday, and 108 today. I understand being outside in the heat, but seattle has 45% humidlity on top of that!  I have 5 children in the Seattle area, and my brother. Only one has air conditioning.  Boy are they moaning!  I told them I was going to start charging them AZ state tax if their weather continued. 


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3
Post by: AZSunny on July 29, 2009, 09:16:03 PM
To be fair about the heat. The WA area has been experiencing a heatwave the past few days with temps soaring over 100 degrees.

It's tough to be out in that kind of heat any length of time. I don't care if you are cops or dogs. Even in a bathing suit it would be hard.



I know the heat is awful for anyone to be in and I am a total dog lover and would never want to see a dog out in that heat... but that is not what I am saying. 

they said the heat was making the scent hard to detect the cadaver scent.  that can't be true.  heat helps detect cadaver scent.  that is the point I was laughing about.  but I guess I just pick apart everything too much,  I just thought that was a crazy statement. 

but I do full well agree, the heat would be awful to be out in.  I feel badly for the people out in it and the dogs, especially the dogs. 

DD, just to insert an OT, I have 3 Bichons, and they go to the door to go out, I open the door and then just stare at me 'don't make me go out there!' One goes out, does his duty and jumps in the pool and before i can catch him has run throught the family room and kitchen and back to his crate, which is where he knows to go is he is wet.  too funny.


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3
Post by: doubledecker on July 29, 2009, 09:23:04 PM
hehe az sunny...

I know the routine exactly LOL  only mine don't get in a crate, they jump in the bed LOL


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3
Post by: mamacrazy30 on July 29, 2009, 09:24:11 PM
To be fair about the heat. The WA area has been experiencing a heatwave the past few days with temps soaring over 100 degrees.

It's tough to be out in that kind of heat any length of time. I don't care if you are cops or dogs. Even in a bathing suit it would be hard.



I know the heat is awful for anyone to be in and I am a total dog lover and would never want to see a dog out in that heat... but that is not what I am saying. 

they said the heat was making the scent hard to detect the cadaver scent.  that can't be true.  heat helps detect cadaver scent.  that is the point I was laughing about.  but I guess I just pick apart everything too much,  I just thought that was a crazy statement. 

but I do full well agree, the heat would be awful to be out in.  I feel badly for the people out in it and the dogs, especially the dogs. 
do you think they are sending the dogs out there needlessly...like a show of ???  sorry..i expect the worst...always


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3
Post by: JessStar on July 29, 2009, 09:28:43 PM
No, they have a reason to send them out. I'm sure of that.


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3
Post by: AZSunny on July 29, 2009, 09:31:32 PM
To be fair about the heat. The WA area has been experiencing a heatwave the past few days with temps soaring over 100 degrees.

It's tough to be out in that kind of heat any length of time. I don't care if you are cops or dogs. Even in a bathing suit it would be hard.



I know the heat is awful for anyone to be in and I am a total dog lover and would never want to see a dog out in that heat... but that is not what I am saying. 

they said the heat was making the scent hard to detect the cadaver scent.  that can't be true.  heat helps detect cadaver scent.  that is the point I was laughing about.  but I guess I just pick apart everything too much,  I just thought that was a crazy statement. 

but I do full well agree, the heat would be awful to be out in.  I feel badly for the people out in it and the dogs, especially the dogs. 
do you think they are sending the dogs out there needlessly...like a show of ???  sorry..i expect the worst...always

Why would you think that any dog handler  would agree to send their dogs out "needlessly" to search in over 100 degree weather?  They would not do it for show, I assure you.


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3
Post by: AZSunny on July 29, 2009, 09:37:33 PM
No, they have a reason to send them out. I'm sure of that.
::MonkeyRoll::


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3
Post by: doubledecker on July 29, 2009, 09:41:21 PM
oh I believe they have a very good reason to have them out there, I just think they are not saying the real reasons they are doing what they are doing or why those other offices are out there. 

I suspect they have a suspect and are trying to find witnesses who might have seen this person/persons in the area... just a guess of mine. 

they might even have the dogs tracking the perp and not lindsey.  to see if the perp was in the area if they have a suspect they can use the scent to track. 

I don't know, just possibilities. 

pierce county being in there really makes me wonder.


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3
Post by: AZSunny on July 29, 2009, 09:43:41 PM
oh I believe they have a very good reason to have them out there, I just think they are not saying the real reasons they are doing what they are doing or why those other offices are out there. 

I suspect they have a suspect and are trying to find witnesses who might have seen this person/persons in the area... just a guess of mine. 

they might even have the dogs tracking the perp and not lindsey.  to see if the perp was in the area if they have a suspect they can use the scent to track. 

I don't know, just possibilities. 

pierce county being in there really makes me wonder.

Didn't they also say Thurston County and I believe Aberdeen?


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3
Post by: doubledecker on July 29, 2009, 09:57:33 PM
oh I believe they have a very good reason to have them out there, I just think they are not saying the real reasons they are doing what they are doing or why those other offices are out there. 

I suspect they have a suspect and are trying to find witnesses who might have seen this person/persons in the area... just a guess of mine. 

they might even have the dogs tracking the perp and not lindsey.  to see if the perp was in the area if they have a suspect they can use the scent to track. 

I don't know, just possibilities. 

pierce county being in there really makes me wonder.

Didn't they also say Thurston County and I believe Aberdeen?

they said aberdeen I read, I forget if thurston, I was just zooming in on pierce. 

aberdeen and pierce caught my eye. 


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3
Post by: mamacrazy30 on July 29, 2009, 10:01:00 PM
To be fair about the heat. The WA area has been experiencing a heatwave the past few days with temps soaring over 100 degrees.

It's tough to be out in that kind of heat any length of time. I don't care if you are cops or dogs. Even in a bathing suit it would be hard.



I know the heat is awful for anyone to be in and I am a total dog lover and would never want to see a dog out in that heat... but that is not what I am saying. 

they said the heat was making the scent hard to detect the cadaver scent.  that can't be true.  heat helps detect cadaver scent.  that is the point I was laughing about.  but I guess I just pick apart everything too much,  I just thought that was a crazy statement. 

but I do full well agree, the heat would be awful to be out in.  I feel badly for the people out in it and the dogs, especially the dogs. 
do you think they are sending the dogs out there needlessly...like a show of ???  sorry..i expect the worst...always

Why would you think that any dog handler  would agree to send their dogs out "needlessly" to search in over 100 degree weather?  They would not do it for show, I assure you.
i don't own search and rescue dogs, but i don't know that if you do and le calls on you for help that you really have a choice....maybe a smarter monkey than i can answer....


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3
Post by: pink angel on July 29, 2009, 10:02:22 PM
oh I believe they have a very good reason to have them out there, I just think they are not saying the real reasons they are doing what they are doing or why those other offices are out there. 

I suspect they have a suspect and are trying to find witnesses who might have seen this person/persons in the area... just a guess of mine. 

they might even have the dogs tracking the perp and not lindsey.  to see if the perp was in the area if they have a suspect they can use the scent to track. 

I don't know, just possibilities. 

pierce county being in there really makes me wonder.

Didn't they also say Thurston County and I believe Aberdeen?



Several agencies, including the FBI, Crime Stoppers and the Pierce County Sheriff's Office, are assisting in the search.

http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,535201,00.html?test=latestnews



Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3
Post by: pink angel on July 29, 2009, 10:05:17 PM
oh I believe they have a very good reason to have them out there, I just think they are not saying the real reasons they are doing what they are doing or why those other offices are out there. 

I suspect they have a suspect and are trying to find witnesses who might have seen this person/persons in the area... just a guess of mine. 

they might even have the dogs tracking the perp and not lindsey.  to see if the perp was in the area if they have a suspect they can use the scent to track. 

I don't know, just possibilities. 

pierce county being in there really makes me wonder.

Didn't they also say Thurston County and I believe Aberdeen?



Several agencies, including the FBI, Crime Stoppers and the Pierce County Sheriff's Office, are assisting in the search.

http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,535201,00.html?test=latestnews




Grays Harbor County Undersheriff Richard Scott told Q13 FOX News that they recently received quite a few tips, so they checked them out on Tuesday with the help of several agencies including the FBI, Aberdeen Police, Crime Stoppers and Thurston, Mason and Pierce County Sheriff's Offices. Pierce County Search & Rescue dogs also helped in the search.


http://www.q13fox.com/news/kcpq-072809-mccleary,0,4668836.story

This is a girl with no means, no money, and no true opportunity to leave. We have nothing specifically that is pointing us in any direction that is going to allow us to rule out any scenario.... this may be a worst case scenario criminal investigation involving a predator or predatory behavior."


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3
Post by: mamacrazy30 on July 29, 2009, 10:10:56 PM
Quote
i don't own search and rescue dogs, but i don't know that if you do and le calls on you for help that you really have a choice....maybe a smarter monkey than i can answer....


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3
Post by: rebelgirl901 on July 29, 2009, 10:27:01 PM
if Lindsey has indeed been the Mcleary area the entire time, and if now they are really starting to search the area, would she still be there now?  who ever has had her Has had her for a month... ::MonkeyNoNo::


Yes it is possible she has been in McCleary the whole time. I think that may be the reason some have not been very helpful in the searches or in providing information to L.E.  Somebody in that town knows what happened to Lindsey.  JMO
so now that they know the heat is on, you think they would still have her in McCleary?

If they are really going door to door & have the search dogs out, then I think they believe she is still in McCleary.   I don't know what to think anymore, there is so much we aren't being told.  I do feel that someone in that town knows where Lindsey is or at least what happened to her. I want so much for them to find Lindsey alive & bring her home but, I just have a bad feeling in the pit of my stomach.  God please let me be wrong about this.


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3
Post by: mamacrazy30 on July 29, 2009, 10:35:36 PM
sorry ya'll the 'new' search sounds like a tip-off to me..maybe i'm jaded. ::MonkeyNoNo::


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3
Post by: JessStar on July 29, 2009, 10:38:17 PM
You're certainly entitled to feel that way mamacrazy. But just think about it for a second- that would be one heck of a big conspiracy if it were a "staged" search intended as a tip-off.


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3
Post by: klaasend on July 29, 2009, 10:40:10 PM
To be fair about the heat. The WA area has been experiencing a heatwave the past few days with temps soaring over 100 degrees.

It's tough to be out in that kind of heat any length of time. I don't care if you are cops or dogs. Even in a bathing suit it would be hard.



I know the heat is awful for anyone to be in and I am a total dog lover and would never want to see a dog out in that heat... but that is not what I am saying. 

they said the heat was making the scent hard to detect the cadaver scent.  that can't be true.  heat helps detect cadaver scent.  that is the point I was laughing about.  but I guess I just pick apart everything too much,  I just thought that was a crazy statement. 

but I do full well agree, the heat would be awful to be out in.  I feel badly for the people out in it and the dogs, especially the dogs. 
do you think they are sending the dogs out there needlessly...like a show of ???  sorry..i expect the worst...always

Why would you think that any dog handler  would agree to send their dogs out "needlessly" to search in over 100 degree weather?  They would not do it for show, I assure you.
i don't own search and rescue dogs, but i don't know that if you do and le calls on you for help that you really have a choice....maybe a smarter monkey than i can answer....

Mamacrazy - of course you have a choice.  I'm certain they have good reason to be out there in this heat. 


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3
Post by: rebelgirl901 on July 29, 2009, 10:41:49 PM


I am sorry but the more articles which try to explain what they are doing, the more ridiculous they sound.  It is just me or our their explanations just stupid

I don't think the heat was quite as stifling in June as it is now. JMO

well I think the heat would make cadaver scent more detectable, not less?

I agree.  I don't know what they are saying.  It doesn't make any sense.   ::MonkeyConfused::   Sorry to be so blunt but cadaver dogs pick up the scent of decomposition, which I'm sure we all know would be worse in the heat. I don't get what they are doing?


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3
Post by: mamacrazy30 on July 29, 2009, 10:53:33 PM
so why the 'big' search now..why now?  why have the basic searches not happened until now??  what is different NOW??  is it that people care? wonder?  i have all the respect in the world for le but why is it so different now than it was a month ago???  sorry to be blunt but if we took the stance that McCleary le took when Lindsey was first reported missing where would we be?  oh chit, and now ya'll will ride me on that...you have to understand...in the interest of ruling people out we have everyone as a suspect....i like to follow Janet..and i agree with most...but can some one tell me really...Who is not a suspect in this??


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3
Post by: mamacrazy30 on July 29, 2009, 10:55:52 PM
so why the 'big' search now..why now?  why have the basic searches not happened until now??  what is different NOW??  is it that people care? wonder?  i have all the respect in the world for le but why is it so different now than it was a month ago???  sorry to be blunt but if we took the stance that McCleary le took when Lindsey was first reported missing where would we be?  oh chit, and now ya'll will ride me on that...you have to understand...in the interest of ruling people out we have everyone as a suspect....i like to follow Janet..and i agree with most...but can some one tell me really...Who is not a suspect in this??
oh what a mess i hope ya'll get the jist ::MonkeyConfused::


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3
Post by: pink angel on July 29, 2009, 10:56:17 PM
I just think Officer Scott doesn't know a lot about searcher dogs, as was babbling. :)

I don't think he knows a lot about searching for missing children either, IMO. Thank goodness the FBI and other agencies are working on this.

Extreme heat or cold, will limit the amount of time the dog can work between rest breaks to as little as a few minutes. Both air temperature and ground temperature need to be considered. Remember the dog’s nose is working at ground level. Often the hottest parts of the day can be avoided; the dogs can work early in the morning, and in the late afternoon and evening.


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3
Post by: klaasend on July 29, 2009, 10:58:52 PM
so why the 'big' search now..why now?  why have the basic searches not happened until now??  what is different NOW??  is it that people care? wonder?  i have all the respect in the world for le but why is it so different now than it was a month ago???  sorry to be blunt but if we took the stance that McCleary le took when Lindsey was first reported missing where would we be?  oh chit, and now ya'll will ride me on that...you have to understand...in the interest of ruling people out we have everyone as a suspect....i like to follow Janet..and i agree with most...but can some one tell me really...Who is not a suspect in this??
oh what a mess i hope ya'll get the jist ::MonkeyConfused::

Mamacrazy - have you even been following this case?  This is not the first "real" search. 

This is the first article posted in the first thread of this case:

Small town baffled, alarmed at 10-year-old girl's disappearance

Story Updated: Jun 27, 2009 at 9:52 PM PDT
By Ray Lane and KOMO News Web Staff

MCCLEARY, Wash. - A wide-ranging search is under way for a 10-year-old girl who vanished Friday evening while walking home from a friend's house in this small town set amid forested hills west of Olympia. And now the entire town is worried.

Lindsey J. Baum was last seen at 9:15 p.m. Friday when she left her friend's home on Maple Street, where she had been visiting, said Dave Pimentel of the Grays Harbor County Sheriff's Office.

Lindsey was going to walk the four blocks to her home on Mommsen Road, which is roughly a 10-minute walk. But something happened in that short distance - Lindsey never arrived home.


 A volunteer goes door to door, passing out fliers about the missing girl.
"She hasn't been seen or heard from since," Pimentel said.

Her mother reported her missing at 10:50 p.m. And as the hours drag by with no sign of her, the girl's family fears she may have been taken by a stranger.

Search teams have been out looking for the girl, using bloodhounds. Sheriff's deputies, meanwhile, are calling people who live in the neighborhood and also are going door to door to see if anyone heard or saw anything.

Other searchers are combing the nearby woods on ATVs. Everyone is anxious for any sign of the missing girl.


Pimentel said Lindsey has never been a runaway. "We don't suspect that at this time," he said.

The girl's disappearance has shocked many residents of McCleary, population 1,550, where the biggest employer is a lumber mill that manufactures doors and people know their neighbors.

"We don't know what happened to her yet. All we know is she's missing, and we're taking every effort we can to try and locate her," he added.

Police say it appears Lindsey walked at least part of the way with home with friends, who didn't see anything unusual.

Melissa McCann, a family friend, said, "This is a small town. These things don't happen. And yet here they are. She comes from her friend's (house) a lot, so it doesn't make sense that she didn't show up at home. We're just baffled."

Pimentel said it's strange that nobody saw anything unusual.

"Such a small community like this - you can't do much in a town this size without everybody knowing about it," he said. "Everybody in town knows she's unaccounted for."

Lindsey's mother admits the 10-year old had been fighting with her brother in the moments before she was last seen, and that Lindsey is still upset about her parent's recent divorce.

But with every passing hour, there are mounting worries that the friendly girl who will talk with anybody is in serious trouble.

Lindsey was last seen wearing a gray hooded pullover sweatshirt, with blue jeans and black shoes. She stands about 4-feet-10-inches and weighs about 85 pounds.

Anyone with information is asked to call the Grays Harbor 911 Center at (800) 281-6944 or the McCleary Police Department at (360) 495-3107.

(http://media.komonews.com/images/090627_lindsey_baum_3.jpg)

http://www.komonews.com/news/49343017.html


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3
Post by: JessStar on July 29, 2009, 11:00:08 PM
Well, we all can be weary of local LE, but the FBI and members of CrimeStoppers, who are assisting in the search, certainly are not suspects.


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3
Post by: JessStar on July 29, 2009, 11:06:58 PM
Those are great observations about the dogs, pinkangel. It reminded me that heat also causes a scent to rise straight up, as opposed to more linearly, which can make detection more difficult for the very reason you state- the dog's noses are close to gound level.


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3
Post by: JessStar on July 29, 2009, 11:09:19 PM
Those are great observations about the dogs, pinkangel. It reminded me that heat also causes a scent to rise straight up, as opposed to more linearly, which can make detection more difficult for the very reason you state- the dog's noses are close to gound level.


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3
Post by: mamacrazy30 on July 29, 2009, 11:14:30 PM
I just think Officer Scott doesn't know a lot about searcher dogs, as was babbling. :)

I don't think he knows a lot about searching for missing children either, IMO. Thank goodness the FBI and other agencies are working on this.

Extreme heat or cold, will limit the amount of time the dog can work between rest breaks to as little as a few minutes. Both air temperature and ground temperature need to be considered. Remember the dog’s nose is working at ground level. Often the hottest parts of the day can be avoided; the dogs can work early in the morning, and in the late afternoon and evening.
on one hand i'm glad he doesn't know a lot about missing children..i wish most communities never have this issue...on the other....
(a little piece of me, my step-father (now) is LE in ks and i've seen his folder on profiling and looking for terrorist and what have you...it was a (i don't know what you call it ...learning credits???  )  Really?? 


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3
Post by: AZSunny on July 29, 2009, 11:29:31 PM
Those are great observations about the dogs, pinkangel. It reminded me that heat also causes a scent to rise straight up, as opposed to more linearly, which can make detection more difficult for the very reason you state- the dog's noses are close to gound level.


JessStar, I wonder how the humidity there, which i understand is at about 45% would impact this?


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3
Post by: Tamikosmom on July 29, 2009, 11:45:33 PM


This is the first article posted in the first thread of this case:

Small town baffled, alarmed at 10-year-old girl's disappearance

Story Updated: Jun 27, 2009 at 9:52 PM PDT
By Ray Lane and KOMO News Web Staff

MCCLEARY, Wash. - A wide-ranging search is under way for a 10-year-old girl who vanished Friday evening while walking home from a friend's house in this small town set amid forested hills west of Olympia. And now the entire town is worried.

Lindsey J. Baum was last seen at 9:15 p.m. Friday when she left her friend's home on Maple Street, where she had been visiting, said Dave Pimentel of the Grays Harbor County Sheriff's Office.

Lindsey was going to walk the four blocks to her home on Mommsen Road, which is roughly a 10-minute walk. But something happened in that short distance - Lindsey never arrived home.


 A volunteer goes door to door, passing out fliers about the missing girl.
"She hasn't been seen or heard from since," Pimentel said.

Her mother reported her missing at 10:50 p.m. And as the hours drag by with no sign of her, the girl's family fears she may have been taken by a stranger.

Search teams have been out looking for the girl, using bloodhounds. Sheriff's deputies, meanwhile, are calling people who live in the neighborhood and also are going door to door to see if anyone heard or saw anything.

Other searchers are combing the nearby woods on ATVs. Everyone is anxious for any sign of the missing girl.


Pimentel said Lindsey has never been a runaway. "We don't suspect that at this time," he said.

The girl's disappearance has shocked many residents of McCleary, population 1,550, where the biggest employer is a lumber mill that manufactures doors and people know their neighbors.

"We don't know what happened to her yet. All we know is she's missing, and we're taking every effort we can to try and locate her," he added.

Police say it appears Lindsey walked at least part of the way with home with friends, who didn't see anything unusual.

Melissa McCann, a family friend, said, "This is a small town. These things don't happen. And yet here they are. She comes from her friend's (house) a lot, so it doesn't make sense that she didn't show up at home. We're just baffled."

Pimentel said it's strange that nobody saw anything unusual.

"Such a small community like this - you can't do much in a town this size without everybody knowing about it," he said. "Everybody in town knows she's unaccounted for."

Lindsey's mother admits the 10-year old had been fighting with her brother in the moments before she was last seen, and that Lindsey is still upset about her parent's recent divorce.

But with every passing hour, there are mounting worries that the friendly girl who will talk with anybody is in serious trouble.

Lindsey was last seen wearing a gray hooded pullover sweatshirt, with blue jeans and black shoes. She stands about 4-feet-10-inches and weighs about 85 pounds.

Anyone with information is asked to call the Grays Harbor 911 Center at (800) 281-6944 or the McCleary Police Department at (360) 495-3107.

(http://media.komonews.com/images/090627_lindsey_baum_3.jpg)

http://www.komonews.com/news/49343017.html


THE TRACKING DOGS

Why was Lindsey's scent not picked up by these dogs.  Think about it ... the Maple Street route was taken by her both going to and coming from the Kampen/Williams residence.

Janet

++++++

KOMO News - June 28, 2009

A wide-ranging search was launched early Saturday in the town and the surrounding forests. The town was criss-crossed three times, but not a trace of Lindsey has been found. Even bloodhounds failed to pick up her scent.

http://www.komonews.com/news/local/49383897.html


The Daily World - July 2, 2009

Scott said authorities have run into several dead ends with almost no signs of the 4-foot-9, brown-haired girl, who was last spotted wearing a blue pullover shirt and blue jeans.

“I don’t know anything more than I knew Saturday afternoon,” he said, “but I’m not willing to admit that I know anything less.”

Scott said bloodhounds traced the route Lindsey took early on from the friend’s house to her own home, but didn’t find any scent. And in places where Lindsey once played — parks and by the creek — Lindsey’s scent has been vanishing.

The loss of scent could be a combination of factors — the heat on the sidewalk could have dissipated it for instance, he said.

http://**/articles/2009/07/02/local_news/doc4a4cf43c1b1dd881132403.txt


IN THE PROCESS OF ELIMINATION

One month too late!

In the process of elimination ... homes and property within that two block stretch from home where Lindsey was witnessed by a neighbour should have been searched at the getgo.  Residents should of been considered persons of interest and brought in for questioning ... not called by LE inquiring whether they saw anything.

In the process of elimination ... the home and property of Melissa Baum should have been search at the getgo.  When you consider the revealed dynamics encompassing Lindsey's brother ... Josh Baum should have been considered a person of interest and brought in for questioning.

In the process of elimination ... the home and property of Wayne Watnee should have been searched at the getgo.  When you consider where this man resides in relation to the the Baum residence and ... his connection to both Linsey and Josh ... this man should have been considered a person of interest and brought in for questioning.

Janet

++++++

Fresh eyes join search for missing girl
Story Published: Jul 28, 2009 at 5:55 PM PDT
Story Updated: Jul 28, 2009 at 6:15 PM PDT

 
By Luke Duecy  Watch the story MCCLEARY, Wash. -- It's been more than a month since Lindsey Baum disappeared while walking home from a friend's house, but investigators are not giving up.

On Tuesday, detectives from Pierce County joined the search, hoping to turn up new leads or tips in the case.

They searched homes, trash cans and crawl spaces near where Lindsey was last seen, and cadaver-sniffing dogs were also brought in to comb the area

http://www.komonews.com/news/local/51941307.html


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3
Post by: mamacrazy30 on July 29, 2009, 11:59:15 PM
ya know,,  i guess i haven't been following this as much as ya'll....you've been so much more into it and can give it more energy than i can....god bless momkeys..pray for Lindsey


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3
Post by: mamacrazy30 on July 30, 2009, 12:08:15 AM
so why the 'big' search now..why now?  why have the basic searches not happened until now??  what is different NOW??  is it that people care? wonder?  i have all the respect in the world for le but why is it so different now than it was a month ago???  sorry to be blunt but if we took the stance that McCleary le took when Lindsey was first reported missing where would we be?  oh chit, and now ya'll will ride me on that...you have to understand...in the interest of ruling people out we have everyone as a suspect....i like to follow Janet..and i agree with most...but can some one tell me really...Who is not a suspect in this??
oh what a mess i hope ya'll get the jist ::MonkeyConfused::

Mamacrazy - have you even been following this case?  This is not the first "real" search. 

This is the first article posted in the first thread of this case:

Small town baffled, alarmed at 10-year-old girl's disappearance

Story Updated: Jun 27, 2009 at 9:52 PM PDT
By Ray Lane and KOMO News Web Staff

MCCLEARY, Wash. - A wide-ranging search is under way for a 10-year-old girl who vanished Friday evening while walking home from a friend's house in this small town set amid forested hills west of Olympia. And now the entire town is worried.

Lindsey J. Baum was last seen at 9:15 p.m. Friday when she left her friend's home on Maple Street, where she had been visiting, said Dave Pimentel of the Grays Harbor County Sheriff's Office.

Lindsey was going to walk the four blocks to her home on Mommsen Road, which is roughly a 10-minute walk. But something happened in that short distance - Lindsey never arrived home.


 A volunteer goes door to door, passing out fliers about the missing girl.
"She hasn't been seen or heard from since," Pimentel said.

Her mother reported her missing at 10:50 p.m. And as the hours drag by with no sign of her, the girl's family fears she may have been taken by a stranger.

Search teams have been out looking for the girl, using bloodhounds. Sheriff's deputies, meanwhile, are calling people who live in the neighborhood and also are going door to door to see if anyone heard or saw anything.

Other searchers are combing the nearby woods on ATVs. Everyone is anxious for any sign of the missing girl.


Pimentel said Lindsey has never been a runaway. "We don't suspect that at this time," he said.

The girl's disappearance has shocked many residents of McCleary, population 1,550, where the biggest employer is a lumber mill that manufactures doors and people know their neighbors.

"We don't know what happened to her yet. All we know is she's missing, and we're taking every effort we can to try and locate her," he added.

Police say it appears Lindsey walked at least part of the way with home with friends, who didn't see anything unusual.

Melissa McCann, a family friend, said, "This is a small town. These things don't happen. And yet here they are. She comes from her friend's (house) a lot, so it doesn't make sense that she didn't show up at home. We're just baffled."

Pimentel said it's strange that nobody saw anything unusual.

"Such a small community like this - you can't do much in a town this size without everybody knowing about it," he said. "Everybody in town knows she's unaccounted for."

Lindsey's mother admits the 10-year old had been fighting with her brother in the moments before she was last seen, and that Lindsey is still upset about her parent's recent divorce.

But with every passing hour, there are mounting worries that the friendly girl who will talk with anybody is in serious trouble.

Lindsey was last seen wearing a gray hooded pullover sweatshirt, with blue jeans and black shoes. She stands about 4-feet-10-inches and weighs about 85 pounds.

Anyone with information is asked to call the Grays Harbor 911 Center at (800) 281-6944 or the McCleary Police Department at (360) 495-3107.

(http://media.komonews.com/images/090627_lindsey_baum_3.jpg)

http://www.komonews.com/news/49343017.html
i guess i haven't been following it AT all.


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3
Post by: Northern Rose on July 30, 2009, 01:05:49 AM
MCCLEARY, Wash. -- It's been more than a month since Lindsey Baum disappeared while walking home from a friend's house, but investigators are not giving up.

On Tuesday, detectives from Pierce County joined the search, hoping to turn up new leads or tips in the case.

They searched homes, trash cans and crawl spaces near where Lindsey was last seen, and cadaver-sniffing dogs were also brought in to comb the area.

Everywhere you look in this small town there's a photo of Lindsey -- posted in store windows, hanging on the side of a truck parked on Main Street.

Everyone knows her name and everyone wants her to come home.

Spending time here you get the feeling the the girl's disappearance has changed the town. Instead of trading the usual neighborhood gossip, it seems all anyone talks about is what might have happened to Lindsey.

Kevin Pratt lives in McCleary and says he's always keeping his eyes open and thinking of the missing girl.

"Every time I go out in these wooded areas, any time I'm out anywhere I'm looking for anything for anything out of the ordinary."

The investigation into Lindsey's disappearance, which has involved multiple local, state and federal law enforcement agencies, has turned up nothing.

http://www.komonews.com/news/local/51941307.html


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3
Post by: Northern Rose on July 30, 2009, 01:07:08 AM
Reader Comment:

catriley123 84p ·  12 hours ago

This is so sad. I imagine the law enforcement people share info with each other, right? I read the newspaper from my old hometown in California, and there was an attempted abduction of a girl around that age, by a man in a white cargo van with Washington plates. I think it was in Santa Maria. As I said, I'd imagine the authorities send out bulletins nationally, so they'd know about this. The Washington plates thing caught my attention.

I hope they find her soon.

http://www.komonews.com/news/local/51941307.html


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3
Post by: doubledecker on July 30, 2009, 01:15:21 AM
Reader Comment:

catriley123 84p ·  12 hours ago

This is so sad. I imagine the law enforcement people share info with each other, right? I read the newspaper from my old hometown in California, and there was an attempted abduction of a girl around that age, by a man in a white cargo van with Washington plates. I think it was in Santa Maria. As I said, I'd imagine the authorities send out bulletins nationally, so they'd know about this. The Washington plates thing caught my attention.

I hope they find her soon.

http://www.komonews.com/news/local/51941307.html


I hope they are paying attention to this, a VAN WITH WASHINGTON PLATES


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3
Post by: klaasend on July 30, 2009, 01:26:02 AM
Reader Comment:

catriley123 84p ·  12 hours ago

This is so sad. I imagine the law enforcement people share info with each other, right? I read the newspaper from my old hometown in California, and there was an attempted abduction of a girl around that age, by a man in a white cargo van with Washington plates. I think it was in Santa Maria. As I said, I'd imagine the authorities send out bulletins nationally, so they'd know about this. The Washington plates thing caught my attention.

I hope they find her soon.

http://www.komonews.com/news/local/51941307.html

http://www.keyt.com/home/ticker/51341337.html

Man Tries To Lure Young Girl Into VanOriginally printed at http://www.keyt.com/home/ticker/51341337.html

Orcutt, CA-- Residents are being told to keep a lookout for a man driving a white van with possibly Washington State license plates.

Santa Barbara Sheriff deputies received a report Monday afternoon, that a man driving a white van near Hartnett and Cane tried to lure an 11-year-old girl into his van.

The girl said, the man pulled up to her and asked her to help him find a lost dog. The girl told sheriff officials that when she ran to a nearby home to call for help.

Detectives say the suspect is in his 50's and was driving a white cargo van with two rear windows covered by curtains.

If you have any information on a possible suspect, you are urged to call the Santa Barbara Sheriff's Department.


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3
Post by: klaasend on July 30, 2009, 01:29:05 AM
It's about a 16hour drive:

(http://i118.photobucket.com/albums/o100/klaasen3/Sub7/CalifMcCleary.jpg)


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3
Post by: klaasend on July 30, 2009, 01:31:39 AM
http://www.ksby.com/Global/story.asp?S=10760272

(snipped)

"They were in a van with Washington plates and no side windows," said 12-year-old Cameron Carter.

12-year-old Skyler Stroop said, "They said he had like, gray hair, yeah. They said like, just to be aware."

Courtnee's close call is the talk of the neighborhood Tuesday.

Sheriff's deputies are looking for a white man in his mid-50s with salt and pepper hair. He is thought to be about 5 feet, 8 inches tall, weighing around 150 pounds. He was last seen driving a white cargo or minivan with Washington plates and no side windows, only a rear window with a curtain.

(snipped)


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3
Post by: JessStar on July 30, 2009, 07:43:26 AM
Regarding the little girl from California and the white van with the Washington plates, that's a pretty significant "coincidence." Has someone passed that on to the tip line?


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3
Post by: JessStar on July 30, 2009, 08:01:43 AM
Regarding the little girl from California and the white van with the Washington plates, that's a pretty significant "coincidence." Has someone passed that on to the tip line?

UPDATE:  I informed the tip line.  I just think that's too coincidental to ignore.  While it is some distance from McCleary, predators have traveled that far to meet who they thought were underage children in sting operations.


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3
Post by: Leroy on July 30, 2009, 08:33:15 AM
Police chase leads on missing McCleary girl
Updated: 07/30/09   1:42 am
 
Searchers returned to the streets of McCleary under a brutal sun Tuesday to follow up on new leads in the hunt for 11-year-old Lindsey Baum, according to The Daily World of Aberdeen.

About 25 officers and searchers with dogs braved near-record temperatures to re-canvass areas of town, Grays Harbor Undersheriff Rick Scott said.

A recent $6,000 reward for information in the missing girl’s case has produced a new wave of tips, Scott said. Surrounding law enforcement agencies including the Thurston County Sheriff’s Office and the Aberdeen Police Department sent officers to help perform follow-up searches and interviews.

About six core investigators have been leading the effort to find Lindsey, who disappeared while walking a few blocks home June 26. The detectives have found no evidence explaining the 4-foot-9, brown-haired girl’s disappearance, but they continue sorting through thousands of tips.

Officers and volunteers knocked on doors throughout town Tuesday, asking new questions and trying to reach people missed in previous interviews, Scott said.

Two teams with cadaver search dogs also roamed the town, he said, but the hot conditions limited the available scents and quickly wore out the dogs.


Scott said detectives and extra officers expect to follow up on new tips in town for at least the rest of the week. He asked anyone with any potentially helpful information to call 866-915-8299.

http://www.thenewstribune.com/news/northwest/story/827963.html


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3
Post by: Leroy on July 30, 2009, 08:35:43 AM
OOPS - sorry....the above article in is regards to Tuesday's search....its early and i thought today was Wednesday!  So I guess there was no search yesterday.


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3
Post by: KarmaRoundUp on July 30, 2009, 08:39:37 AM
Reader Comment:

catriley123 84p ·  12 hours ago

This is so sad. I imagine the law enforcement people share info with each other, right? I read the newspaper from my old hometown in California, and there was an attempted abduction of a girl around that age, by a man in a white cargo van with Washington plates. I think it was in Santa Maria. As I said, I'd imagine the authorities send out bulletins nationally, so they'd know about this. The Washington plates thing caught my attention.

I hope they find her soon.

http://www.komonews.com/news/local/51941307.html

http://www.keyt.com/home/ticker/51341337.html

Man Tries To Lure Young Girl Into VanOriginally printed at http://www.keyt.com/home/ticker/51341337.html

Orcutt, CA-- Residents are being told to keep a lookout for a man driving a white van with possibly Washington State license plates.

Santa Barbara Sheriff deputies received a report Monday afternoon, that a man driving a white van near Hartnett and Cane tried to lure an 11-year-old girl into his van.

The girl said, the man pulled up to her and asked her to help him find a lost dog. The girl told sheriff officials that when she ran to a nearby home to call for help.

Detectives say the suspect is in his 50's and was driving a white cargo van with two rear windows covered by curtains.

If you have any information on a possible suspect, you are urged to call the Santa Barbara Sheriff's Department.

Thanks Klaas
Interesting that the white van guy was also looking for help in finding his lost dog.I sure hope that McCleary LE has fully investigated the man looking for help in finding his lost dog 2 days before Lindsey disappeared.


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3
Post by: Tamikosmom on July 30, 2009, 10:13:48 AM
Police chase leads on missing McCleary girl
Updated: 07/30/09   1:42 am
 
Searchers returned to the streets of McCleary under a brutal sun Tuesday to follow up on new leads in the hunt for 11-year-old Lindsey Baum, according to The Daily World of Aberdeen.

About 25 officers and searchers with dogs braved near-record temperatures to re-canvass areas of town, Grays Harbor Undersheriff Rick Scott said.

A recent $6,000 reward for information in the missing girl’s case has produced a new wave of tips, Scott said. Surrounding law enforcement agencies including the Thurston County Sheriff’s Office and the Aberdeen Police Department sent officers to help perform follow-up searches and interviews.

About six core investigators have been leading the effort to find Lindsey, who disappeared while walking a few blocks home June 26. The detectives have found no evidence explaining the 4-foot-9, brown-haired girl’s disappearance, but they continue sorting through thousands of tips.

Officers and volunteers knocked on doors throughout town Tuesday, asking new questions and trying to reach people missed in previous interviews, Scott said.

Two teams with cadaver search dogs also roamed the town, he said, but the hot conditions limited the available scents and quickly wore out the dogs.


Scott said detectives and extra officers expect to follow up on new tips in town for at least the rest of the week. He asked anyone with any potentially helpful information to call 866-915-8299.

http://www.thenewstribune.com/news/northwest/story/827963.html


One month too late.

 ::MonkeyNoNo::


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3
Post by: AZSunny on July 30, 2009, 10:19:04 AM
Reader Comment:

catriley123 84p ·  12 hours ago

This is so sad. I imagine the law enforcement people share info with each other, right? I read the newspaper from my old hometown in California, and there was an attempted abduction of a girl around that age, by a man in a white cargo van with Washington plates. I think it was in Santa Maria. As I said, I'd imagine the authorities send out bulletins nationally, so they'd know about this. The Washington plates thing caught my attention.

I hope they find her soon.

http://www.komonews.com/news/local/51941307.html

http://www.keyt.com/home/ticker/51341337.html

Man Tries To Lure Young Girl Into VanOriginally printed at http://www.keyt.com/home/ticker/51341337.html

Orcutt, CA-- Residents are being told to keep a lookout for a man driving a white van with possibly Washington State license plates.

Santa Barbara Sheriff deputies received a report Monday afternoon, that a man driving a white van near Hartnett and Cane tried to lure an 11-year-old girl into his van.

The girl said, the man pulled up to her and asked her to help him find a lost dog.  The girl told sheriff officials that when she ran to a nearby home to call for help.

Detectives say the suspect is in his 50's and was driving a white cargo van with two rear windows covered by curtains.

If you have any information on a possible suspect, you are urged to call the Santa Barbara Sheriff's Department.



Wow,  didn't Lindsey's mother say that 2 days before her disappearance a man was looking for his lost dog? Didn't she go to the park to help search....HINKY METER ALERT!!


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3
Post by: AZSunny on July 30, 2009, 10:19:53 AM
Reader Comment:

catriley123 84p ·  12 hours ago

This is so sad. I imagine the law enforcement people share info with each other, right? I read the newspaper from my old hometown in California, and there was an attempted abduction of a girl around that age, by a man in a white cargo van with Washington plates. I think it was in Santa Maria. As I said, I'd imagine the authorities send out bulletins nationally, so they'd know about this. The Washington plates thing caught my attention.

I hope they find her soon.

http://www.komonews.com/news/local/51941307.html

http://www.keyt.com/home/ticker/51341337.html

Man Tries To Lure Young Girl Into VanOriginally printed at http://www.keyt.com/home/ticker/51341337.html

Orcutt, CA-- Residents are being told to keep a lookout for a man driving a white van with possibly Washington State license plates.

Santa Barbara Sheriff deputies received a report Monday afternoon, that a man driving a white van near Hartnett and Cane tried to lure an 11-year-old girl into his van.

The girl said, the man pulled up to her and asked her to help him find a lost dog. The girl told sheriff officials that when she ran to a nearby home to call for help.

Detectives say the suspect is in his 50's and was driving a white cargo van with two rear windows covered by curtains.

If you have any information on a possible suspect, you are urged to call the Santa Barbara Sheriff's Department.

Thanks Klaas
Interesting that the white van guy was also looking for help in finding his lost dog.I sure hope that McCleary LE has fully investigated the man looking for help in finding his lost dog 2 days before Lindsey disappeared.

WHOOPs, posted before I saw this...great minds. 


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3
Post by: AZSunny on July 30, 2009, 10:22:56 AM
I don't remember, but was the guy in McCleary  looking for his dog ,also driving a white van??   

If there is a connection here, Lindsey could be anywhere between McCleary and Santa Barbara.  How sad.

JessStar, thanks for reporting this!!


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3
Post by: JessStar on July 30, 2009, 10:37:32 AM
I don't remember, but was the guy in McCleary  looking for his dog ,also driving a white van??   

If there is a connection here, Lindsey could be anywhere between McCleary and Santa Barbara.  How sad.

JessStar, thanks for reporting this!!

Absolutely.  This threw up a GIGANTIC red flag when I read it.  There are just too many parallels to ignore it.


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3
Post by: no rose colored glasses on July 30, 2009, 10:41:15 AM
I don't remember, but was the guy in McCleary  looking for his dog ,also driving a white van??   

If there is a connection here, Lindsey could be anywhere between McCleary and Santa Barbara.  How sad.

JessStar, thanks for reporting this!!

Absolutely.  This threw up a GIGANTIC red flag when I read it.  There are just too many parallels to ignore it.
Exactly, and one just doesn't know, could mean nothing, could mean everything.


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3
Post by: Rob on July 30, 2009, 11:17:12 AM
I don't remember, but was the guy in McCleary  looking for his dog ,also driving a white van??   

If there is a connection here, Lindsey could be anywhere between McCleary and Santa Barbara.  How sad.

JessStar, thanks for reporting this!!

Absolutely.  This threw up a GIGANTIC red flag when I read it.  There are just too many parallels to ignore it.
Exactly, and one just doesn't know, could mean nothing, could mean everything.

this alleged offender fits my profile to a tee...

no offense to anyone digging thru the mountains of sex local sex offenders intended...

but this is more along the lines of what I believe is a hit and run abduction.... and occurred in Lindsey's case...

in town and gone or stopped in town and gone...


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3
Post by: KarmaRoundUp on July 30, 2009, 11:26:14 AM
Reader Comment:

catriley123 84p ·  12 hours ago

This is so sad. I imagine the law enforcement people share info with each other, right? I read the newspaper from my old hometown in California, and there was an attempted abduction of a girl around that age, by a man in a white cargo van with Washington plates. I think it was in Santa Maria. As I said, I'd imagine the authorities send out bulletins nationally, so they'd know about this. The Washington plates thing caught my attention.

I hope they find her soon.

http://www.komonews.com/news/local/51941307.html

http://www.keyt.com/home/ticker/51341337.html

Man Tries To Lure Young Girl Into VanOriginally printed at http://www.keyt.com/home/ticker/51341337.html

Orcutt, CA-- Residents are being told to keep a lookout for a man driving a white van with possibly Washington State license plates.

Santa Barbara Sheriff deputies received a report Monday afternoon, that a man driving a white van near Hartnett and Cane tried to lure an 11-year-old girl into his van.

The girl said, the man pulled up to her and asked her to help him find a lost dog. The girl told sheriff officials that when she ran to a nearby home to call for help.

Detectives say the suspect is in his 50's and was driving a white cargo van with two rear windows covered by curtains.

If you have any information on a possible suspect, you are urged to call the Santa Barbara Sheriff's Department.

Thanks Klaas
Interesting that the white van guy was also looking for help in finding his lost dog.I sure hope that McCleary LE has fully investigated the man looking for help in finding his lost dog 2 days before Lindsey disappeared.

WHOOPs, posted before I saw this...great minds. 
::MonkeyWink::


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3
Post by: KarmaRoundUp on July 30, 2009, 11:28:28 AM
I don't remember, but was the guy in McCleary  looking for his dog ,also driving a white van??   

If there is a connection here, Lindsey could be anywhere between McCleary and Santa Barbara.  How sad.

JessStar, thanks for reporting this!!
I don't remember if they said what the lost dog guy in McCleary was driving but Lindsey did ask her Mama if she could help hang up flyers and search for the dog.....I'll have to check the last few pages of this thread for that info.


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3
Post by: AZSunny on July 30, 2009, 11:31:35 AM
I don't remember, but was the guy in McCleary  looking for his dog ,also driving a white van??   

If there is a connection here, Lindsey could be anywhere between McCleary and Santa Barbara.  How sad.

JessStar, thanks for reporting this!!

Absolutely.  This threw up a GIGANTIC red flag when I read it.  There are just too many parallels to ignore it.
Exactly, and one just doesn't know, could mean nothing, could mean everything.

this alleged offender fits my profile to a tee...

no offense to anyone digging thru the mountains of sex local sex offenders intended...

but this is more along the lines of what I believe is a hit and run abduction.... and occurred in Lindsey's case...

in town and gone or stopped in town and gone...

You are possibly right Rob, we are covering all the bases, and there are some interesting "local" links within a 100 radius as well. 


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3
Post by: sunshine12 on July 30, 2009, 11:34:46 AM
i think there could be a connection here and i'm glad someone called the police or fbi about this... if this is the same person that took lindsey, it would make sense that maybe it was someone local to the area in mccleary or that part of washington state (b/c of the washington plates) and then he decided to flee the area and head south through california where he got the urge to try it again, sadly, if this is the connection we have been looking for, lindsey could be anywhere, but i'd be looking south of mccleary


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3
Post by: KarmaRoundUp on July 30, 2009, 11:36:42 AM
It is in thread # 2,page #75

Karma wrote:
Quote
From Yosande at WS(after listening to the talk radio show with Melissa):
Melissa stated:

two days before LIndsey went missing, a man was looking for a missing dog. It was legit, and he posted posters around town, but she used it as an opportunity to remind Lindsey of cautions.

MB said she showed Lindsey the SO website.

She wouldn't have gotten in a car with a stranger, she would have fought.

MB says someone knows something.

People know something.

She is concerned someone is covering for the perp.

MB said it was almost 11pm before it got dark that night.

She says her son is a wanderer.

LB was last seen at 9:20pm

She said Lindsey was aware of safety issues.

She said she told Lindsey to kick, fight, scream, if someone ever tried to abduct her.

She said Lindsey had slip on shoes on, and her shoes were not found.

Talking about a website called takeroot.org about adults who were abducted as children, and family members of abducted children.
http://www.takeroot.org/
http://websleuths.com/forums/showthread.php?t=86992&page=7


and
Karma wrote:
Quote
More from Yosande at WS re:radio show with Melissa:
Melissa stated:
MB said it was legit, but I hope LE checked him out anyway.

(I wonder if a local can give us more info on this person, or grab a poster of the dog.)stated by Yosande


Driving around asking kids if they saw his dog.

Lindsey and friends decided to go to the park to look for the dog.

Mom reminded her of being cautious.

Lindsey said, "Duh mom, I'm not stupid."
http://websleuths.com/forums/showthread.php?t=86992&page=7


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3
Post by: Rob on July 30, 2009, 11:41:25 AM


You are possibly right Rob, we are covering all the bases, and there are some interesting "local" links within a 100 radius as well. 

AZ, I'm aware of the offenders - and said in my initial post that Lindsey is not in the immediate area and with-in 120 miles. So I do appreciate everyone's efforts.

 ::MonkeyWink::

Good to see you!!!


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3
Post by: KarmaRoundUp on July 30, 2009, 11:43:15 AM
Someone at WS found these images of Lindsey on Melissa Baum's facebook.




Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3
Post by: Rob on July 30, 2009, 11:44:51 AM
It's about a 16hour drive:

(http://i118.photobucket.com/albums/o100/klaasen3/Sub7/CalifMcCleary.jpg)

I wonder if this person is heading into Mexico, and might have his license plate capture at the border??

Someone should call the border guards... juss sayin'


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3
Post by: JessStar on July 30, 2009, 12:00:40 PM
It's about a 16hour drive:

(http://i118.photobucket.com/albums/o100/klaasen3/Sub7/CalifMcCleary.jpg)

I wonder if this person is heading into Mexico, and might have his license plate capture at the border??

Someone should call the border guards... juss sayin'

VERY possible Rob.  But that darn incident was reported on July 21st, so if he was heading to Mexico, he's there already.   ::MonkeyWaa::


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3
Post by: JessStar on July 30, 2009, 12:04:28 PM
Someone at WS found these images of Lindsey on Melissa Baum's facebook.




Those look to be a few years old.   ::MonkeyWaa:: ::MonkeyNoNo::My heart aches when I see pictures like that.  She's such a cute girl. 


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3
Post by: doubledecker on July 30, 2009, 12:05:44 PM
Sheriff's deputies say they have contacted a man who fits the young girl's description and he does drive a white van.

But as of right now, they are not sure any crime has been committed.

http://www.ksby.com/Global/story.asp?S=10760272


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3
Post by: doubledecker on July 30, 2009, 12:08:26 PM
he was inside the gated community, so you would think he had some kind of connection to be in there?  maybe a landscaper/gardener or delivered something?  but you can say you are going in to deliver something and a lot of times the gatekeeper will let you in, or if you have ever been in there before they just wave you on through. 

weird he would pic a gated community to try this?


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3
Post by: Edward on July 30, 2009, 12:25:24 PM
We had 14 attempted abductions noted in the Amber Dubois case from San Diego to Los Angeles.. and this is the mysterious White Van that has been noted in 3 or those attempted abductions ?? The lic plate possibly being Washington..means just that..possibly.
They need real witness or again they need detectives at ALL gas stations reviewing video and ALL street intersection Video and ANY video surveillance along the freeways that may identify this van..
It could be relative to Lindsey.. It could be relative to Amber and look at the distance this perp travels !! from Washington to San Diego !

We need real efforts by LE and the F.B.I. as this is possibly a multi state crime..
 IF he took Amber from Escondido and headed to Washington she really could be anywhere along that path..
I hate letting my mind get out that far..


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3
Post by: sunshine12 on July 30, 2009, 12:27:18 PM
he was inside the gated community, so you would think he had some kind of connection to be in there?  maybe a landscaper/gardener or delivered something?  but you can say you are going in to deliver something and a lot of times the gatekeeper will let you in, or if you have ever been in there before they just wave you on through. 

weird he would pic a gated community to try this?

yea i dunno why he would be a gardener or something tho with washington plates


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3
Post by: Edward on July 30, 2009, 12:27:45 PM
Sheriff's deputies say they have contacted a man who fits the young girl's description and he does drive a white van.

But as of right now, they are not sure any crime has been committed.

http://www.ksby.com/Global/story.asp?S=10760272

Interesting... DNA test kit !!!


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3
Post by: Edward on July 30, 2009, 12:31:49 PM
Test his van for Amber TOO.


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3
Post by: doubledecker on July 30, 2009, 12:32:44 PM
We had 14 attempted abductions noted in the Amber Dubois case from San Diego to Los Angeles.. and this is the mysterious White Van that has been noted in 3 or those attempted abductions ?? The lic plate possibly being Washington..means just that..possibly.
They need real witness or again they need detectives at ALL gas stations reviewing video and ALL street intersection Video and ANY video surveillance along the freeways that may identify this van..
It could be relative to Lindsey.. It could be relative to Amber and look at the distance this perp travels !! from Washington to San Diego !

We need real efforts by LE and the F.B.I. as this is possibly a multi state crime..
 IF he took Amber from Escondido and headed to Washington she really could be anywhere along that path..
I hate letting my mind get out that far..

I agree with you Edward, my first thought on this was hmmm, amber dubois and the white van seen all over southern cali.  we also have to realize criminals will slap another set of plates on the vehicles, commit the crimes and then pull them off.  white vans, UGH... all over heck and back. 

but it makes sense to me that a perp would travel all over the place back and forth and around and around so as not to have evidence showing up all in one place.  these guys are mobile.  just pull your van to a campground, camp out a week, go another 500 miles and do it again, leave the victim 1000 miles away.  how you going to keep up with these people. 


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3
Post by: doubledecker on July 30, 2009, 12:40:22 PM
you know I just have to go ahead and say this. 

adam campbell said more than those two posts on lindsey's guestbook. 
and part of what he said was, as far as I can figure it out was:

man and woman hide in woods, at lake swimming, in a van, take stolen kids, etc. 
see this is what someone is doing.  does he suspect it?  does he KNOW about it?  but see he mentions the VAN too.  they are all over the dang place. 


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3
Post by: Edward on July 30, 2009, 12:44:46 PM
Hi DoubleDecker.. You have been doing some great research..
A Migrating worker from Mexico..
My dad lives in Oregon and owns a mobile home park along the coast and half of his renters are migrant workers from Mexico..
So I do think it is very likely that the occupant of this van could be just that.

Sheriff appear to have somebody and I will just cross my fingers and hope for the best..


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3
Post by: Rob on July 30, 2009, 12:52:31 PM
you know I just have to go ahead and say this. 

adam campbell said more than those two posts on lindsey's guestbook. 
and part of what he said was, as far as I can figure it out was:

man and woman hide in woods, at lake swimming, in a van, take stolen kids, etc. 
see this is what someone is doing.  does he suspect it?  does he KNOW about it?  but see he mentions the VAN too.  they are all over the dang place. 

my initial thoughts in Amber's case were / was a VAN was used - from either New Mexico or Arizona with those state license plates....... it's easy to add in Washington now... I initially thought of migrant workers in construction, food service (vegetable pickers) and possibly vineyard day labors...

Originally, I thought of Arizona, New Mexico and California -

maybe it's time to check Oregon for related cases...possibly a five state crime spree / enterprise.


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3
Post by: doubledecker on July 30, 2009, 12:53:42 PM
Hi DoubleDecker.. You have been doing some great research..
A Migrating worker from Mexico..
My dad lives in Oregon and owns a mobile home park along the coast and half of his renters are migrant workers from Mexico..
So I do think it is very likely that the occupant of this van could be just that.

Sheriff appear to have somebody and I will just cross my fingers and hope for the best..

I had asked a local up there about migrant workers in the area.  they do come in there I was told.  well a lot of times they will work on the tree planting and some of the other forest service contracts, I do know this.  And I was told yes, they do come in the area there.  And there are a LOT Of WHITE migrant workers as well.  And they do travel a circuit from wash, oregon, cali, az, florida, sometimes in idaho and montana as well.  that is the main circuit.  they are very mobile, switch cars like underwear, have vans, campers, travel trailers, motorhomes, all good places to conceal stolen kids.  There is a stolen child ring which has traveled this circuit for decades. 


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3
Post by: no rose colored glasses on July 30, 2009, 12:55:02 PM
you know I just have to go ahead and say this. 

adam campbell said more than those two posts on lindsey's guestbook. 
and part of what he said was, as far as I can figure it out was:

man and woman hide in woods, at lake swimming, in a van, take stolen kids, etc. 
see this is what someone is doing.  does he suspect it?  does he KNOW about it?  but see he mentions the VAN too.  they are all over the dang place. 
  ::MonkeyEek:: Very interesting, and he mentions VAN also, now I'm really thinking something is up with this. Does he say white van? And why is he saying this in a guestbook of a missing child, is really the big question I have.


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3
Post by: doubledecker on July 30, 2009, 12:58:30 PM
you know I just have to go ahead and say this. 

adam campbell said more than those two posts on lindsey's guestbook. 
and part of what he said was, as far as I can figure it out was:

man and woman hide in woods, at lake swimming, in a van, take stolen kids, etc. 
see this is what someone is doing.  does he suspect it?  does he KNOW about it?  but see he mentions the VAN too.  they are all over the dang place. 
  ::MonkeyEek:: Very interesting, and he mentions VAN also, now I'm really thinking something is up with this. Does he say white van? And why is he saying this in a guestbook of a missing child, is really the big question I have.

he did not say this part in the guestbook. this was elsewhere.  and all he said about a VAN was in the middle of a sentence  where he mentions VAN, nothing more was said about a van other than this part. 

I know but in the State Law very wrong Man or Woman if who has have "Sexual offender Level" after take stolen Boys & Girls" hide bring go somewhere home or lots many tree hide, motel hide, Van hide, Lake Swimming hide


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3
Post by: doubledecker on July 30, 2009, 01:02:56 PM
you know I just have to go ahead and say this. 

adam campbell said more than those two posts on lindsey's guestbook. 
and part of what he said was, as far as I can figure it out was:

man and woman hide in woods, at lake swimming, in a van, take stolen kids, etc. 
see this is what someone is doing.  does he suspect it?  does he KNOW about it?  but see he mentions the VAN too.  they are all over the dang place. 

my initial thoughts in Amber's case were / was a VAN was used - from either New Mexico or Arizona with those state license plates....... it's easy to add in Washington now... I initially thought of migrant workers in construction, food service (vegetable pickers) and possibly vineyard day labors...

Originally, I thought of Arizona, New Mexico and California -

maybe it's time to check Oregon for related cases...possibly a five state crime spree / enterprise.

Rob, some of this has being going on for decades that I know of.  It spans the states I just posted, it is a wide circuit they make.  I have looked at this forever.  its a real mess and it involves white migrant workers also.  they pick fruit, work the forests, and the cotton gins in AZ on the off time, then head to florida, back to cali, then oregon or wash or both, sometimes into idaho/montana for cherries, then back to AZ. start all over again.  they can be mobile, work if they want or don't want with no record of anything, change cars everywhere they go, etc.  its an other world.  you would have to see it to understand it.  it's a whole sub-culture. 


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3
Post by: doubledecker on July 30, 2009, 01:05:43 PM
oh I should add, they change their names as often as they change there vehicles.  so they are very hard to track.  if they do not want to be found, you won't find them.


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3
Post by: Rob on July 30, 2009, 01:06:09 PM
you know I just have to go ahead and say this. 

adam campbell said more than those two posts on lindsey's guestbook. 
and part of what he said was, as far as I can figure it out was:

man and woman hide in woods, at lake swimming, in a van, take stolen kids, etc. 
see this is what someone is doing.  does he suspect it?  does he KNOW about it?  but see he mentions the VAN too.  they are all over the dang place. 
  ::MonkeyEek:: Very interesting, and he mentions VAN also, now I'm really thinking something is up with this. Does he say white van? And why is he saying this in a guestbook of a missing child, is really the big question I have.

emboldened a portion of doubledecker's post..

interesting that Adam Campbell seems to know underlying info... and un-related to these particular cases, but in the Maddy McCann case - Robert Murat KNEW about the local pedo ring in Praia Da Luz - and told the police and was arrested... and his main associate and business partner - Sergei Malinka - was caught in the act of wiping out several 500 gig hard drives as the police kicked in his door...Malinka was a computer expert from Russia.

Now how do SO's or alleged SO's know these things unless they are peripherally connected - I don't believe in coincidences.


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3
Post by: doubledecker on July 30, 2009, 01:11:36 PM
you know I just have to go ahead and say this. 

adam campbell said more than those two posts on lindsey's guestbook. 
and part of what he said was, as far as I can figure it out was:

man and woman hide in woods, at lake swimming, in a van, take stolen kids, etc. 
see this is what someone is doing.  does he suspect it?  does he KNOW about it?  but see he mentions the VAN too.  they are all over the dang place. 
  ::MonkeyEek:: Very interesting, and he mentions VAN also, now I'm really thinking something is up with this. Does he say white van? And why is he saying this in a guestbook of a missing child, is really the big question I have.

emboldened a portion of doubledecker's post..

interesting that Adam Campbell seems to know underlying info... and un-related to these particular cases, but in the Maddy McCann case - Robert Murat KNEW about the local pedo ring in Praia Da Luz - and told the police and was arrested... and his main associate and business partner - Sergei Malinka - was caught in the act of wiping out several 500 gig hard drives as the police kicked in his door...Malinka was a computer expert from Russia.

Now how do SO's or alleged SO's know these things unless they are peripherally connected - I don't believe in coincidences.

and this is why I paid attention to adam the way I did.  people kept saying he was a Bot, but I knew right off he knew something because I have seen too much of this stuff.  Granted he is deaf and that made a lot of what he was saying come off weird to the point I could not tell how much was INFO CODED and how much he was having a problem relaying info because he is deaf.  but I finally figured it out for the most part, now I can understand him.  He knows what these people do.  and it is about more than lindsey.  It is what they do all over the place.  I honestly believe he was trying to help.  But it came out crazy, but I understand him NOW, but now he has disappeared UGH. 


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3
Post by: Rob on July 30, 2009, 01:13:30 PM
you know I just have to go ahead and say this. 

adam campbell said more than those two posts on lindsey's guestbook. 
and part of what he said was, as far as I can figure it out was:

man and woman hide in woods, at lake swimming, in a van, take stolen kids, etc. 
see this is what someone is doing.  does he suspect it?  does he KNOW about it?  but see he mentions the VAN too.  they are all over the dang place. 

my initial thoughts in Amber's case were / was a VAN was used - from either New Mexico or Arizona with those state license plates....... it's easy to add in Washington now... I initially thought of migrant workers in construction, food service (vegetable pickers) and possibly vineyard day labors...

Originally, I thought of Arizona, New Mexico and California -

maybe it's time to check Oregon for related cases...possibly a five state crime spree / enterprise.

Rob, some of this has being going on for decades that I know of.  It spans the states I just posted, it is a wide circuit they make.  I have looked at this forever.  its a real mess and it involves white migrant workers also.  they pick fruit, work the forests, and the cotton gins in AZ on the off time, then head to florida, back to cali, then oregon or wash or both, sometimes into idaho/montana for cherries, then back to AZ. start all over again.  they can be mobile, work if they want or don't want with no record of anything, change cars everywhere they go, etc.  its an other world.  you would have to see it to understand it.  it's a whole sub-culture. 

22% of all federal inmates are illegals..almost all are in CA, NM, Arizona, Nevada, Florida, Texas, Washington, Oregon, and New York. Of course some are in Colorado and Idaho and North and South Dakota.

they bring their bankrupt central American culture with them and all heck breaks loose...


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3
Post by: no rose colored glasses on July 30, 2009, 01:15:11 PM
you know I just have to go ahead and say this. 

adam campbell said more than those two posts on lindsey's guestbook. 
and part of what he said was, as far as I can figure it out was:

man and woman hide in woods, at lake swimming, in a van, take stolen kids, etc. 
see this is what someone is doing.  does he suspect it?  does he KNOW about it?  but see he mentions the VAN too.  they are all over the dang place. 
  ::MonkeyEek:: Very interesting, and he mentions VAN also, now I'm really thinking something is up with this. Does he say white van? And why is he saying this in a guestbook of a missing child, is really the big question I have.

he did not say this part in the guestbook. this was elsewhere.  and all he said about a VAN was in the middle of a sentence  where he mentions VAN, nothing more was said about a van other than this part. 

I know but in the State Law very wrong Man or Woman if who has have "Sexual offender Level" after take stolen Boys & Girls" hide bring go somewhere home or lots many tree hide, motel hide, Van hide, Lake Swimming hide
Thanks, but still very strange.


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3
Post by: Rob on July 30, 2009, 01:16:37 PM
and this is why I paid attention to adam the way I did.  people kept saying he was a Bot, but I knew right off he knew something because I have seen too much of this stuff.  Granted he is deaf and that made a lot of what he was saying come off weird to the point I could not tell how much was INFO CODED and how much he was having a problem relaying info because he is deaf.  but I finally figured it out for the most part, now I can understand him.  He knows what these people do.  and it is about more than lindsey.  It is what they do all over the place.  I honestly believe he was trying to help.  But it came out crazy, but I understand him NOW, but now he has disappeared UGH. 

Who was Adam Campbell in jail with and where? maybe someone was paroled that he is aware of...?? It's possible he gained knowledge while in jail of the inner workings of a traveling group..

Criminals, when bored, often speak to each other about their escapades and dastardly deeds.


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3
Post by: canadianmonkey on July 30, 2009, 01:18:39 PM
About the unmarked white van that is used in alot of attempts of kidnapping.  Part of my job is to clear shipments going into the states from Canadian.  3 years ago we had a plain white van.  We were stopped going across the border every time.  We were finally told that the truck inspectors were targeting ANY unmarked white van and it was recommended that we get some logo put on the truck.  Since we now have a logo on the truck we aren't stopped.  If this is happening in border states maybe more people can push their states to inforce the same kind of rule.  It's alot easier to identify a van if it has some sort of markings on it.  I know markings can be changed but it has to be easier then an unmarked white van.  Just a thought.


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3
Post by: A_News_Junkie_Monkey on July 30, 2009, 01:20:47 PM
and this is why I paid attention to adam the way I did.  people kept saying he was a Bot, but I knew right off he knew something because I have seen too much of this stuff.  Granted he is deaf and that made a lot of what he was saying come off weird to the point I could not tell how much was INFO CODED and how much he was having a problem relaying info because he is deaf.  but I finally figured it out for the most part, now I can understand him.  He knows what these people do.  and it is about more than lindsey.  It is what they do all over the place.  I honestly believe he was trying to help.  But it came out crazy, but I understand him NOW, but now he has disappeared UGH

Who was Adam Campbell in jail with and where? maybe someone was paroled that he is aware of...?? It's possible he gained knowledge while in jail of the inner workings of a traveling group..

Criminals, when bored, often speak to each other about their escapades and dastardly deeds.

Two things come to mind:
1.  He is involved and hiding ................ and two, more daunting
2.  He has valuable information on this case (or a ring) and he is being dealt with in a manner in which would silence him forever.  I sure hope LE finds him soon and determines which it is.

Or, in all fairness I guess there is a remote possibility he is just a nut, inserting himself in a case like John M. Karr - but I don't think so.


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3
Post by: sunshine12 on July 30, 2009, 01:32:30 PM
i think its highly possible that adam campbell is not involved at all in any of this, however is aware of the child ring going through the different states and wants to bring that information to light as a possibility of what happened to lindsey so that someone would investigate it


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3
Post by: doubledecker on July 30, 2009, 01:33:28 PM
and this is why I paid attention to adam the way I did.  people kept saying he was a Bot, but I knew right off he knew something because I have seen too much of this stuff.  Granted he is deaf and that made a lot of what he was saying come off weird to the point I could not tell how much was INFO CODED and how much he was having a problem relaying info because he is deaf.  but I finally figured it out for the most part, now I can understand him.  He knows what these people do.  and it is about more than lindsey.  It is what they do all over the place.  I honestly believe he was trying to help.  But it came out crazy, but I understand him NOW, but now he has disappeared UGH. 

Who was Adam Campbell in jail with and where? maybe someone was paroled that he is aware of...?? It's possible he gained knowledge while in jail of the inner workings of a traveling group..

Criminals, when bored, often speak to each other about their escapades and dastardly deeds.

adam is 31 yrs old, convicted in 1995 in washinton, he was approx 17 at the time.  so he might have got probation or sent to youth authority or who knows, or turned 18 during and in county jail.  if he did go to prison it would be in the state of WASH... and how long would he have stayed I don't know.  my guess he did not go to prison because of his age BACK THEN and spent little time if any. 

I believe he probably hooked up with the HOMELESS and this is where he has been in and about all this mess.  Because he is a registered sex offender he probably had contact with other homeless registered sex offenders.  My guess is he hooked up with some homeless sex offender along the line and might have seen or heard a lot.  If you are hooked up with one of them and they come back to your homeless camp with some child, you pretty much know the story of what is going on.  He also could have set in "group sessions" with other sex offenders and heard about it all.  He might have also been involved who knows.  I really am beginning to doubt he was involved other than maybe knowing about it because he is on the guestbook with his own name, his own old email addy and saying this stuff.  why in the heck would he do that.  My guess is he wanted to help, as crazy as that seems.  Or adam just does not fully understand what he is doing... obviously could be the main reason. 

I do know the dets interviewed him and he did not kidnap lindsey when she disappeared.  did he have contact with someone who did?  he might have.  Did he see someone with her after that, he certainly could have, was he one of the guys walking her down the road in Roy, it is very possible, did he decide to tell, he might have.  I don't know, I can't locate him.  ugh


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3
Post by: doubledecker on July 30, 2009, 01:39:52 PM
About the unmarked white van that is used in alot of attempts of kidnapping.  Part of my job is to clear shipments going into the states from Canadian.  3 years ago we had a plain white van.  We were stopped going across the border every time.  We were finally told that the truck inspectors were targeting ANY unmarked white van and it was recommended that we get some logo put on the truck.  Since we now have a logo on the truck we aren't stopped.  If this is happening in border states maybe more people can push their states to inforce the same kind of rule.  It's alot easier to identify a van if it has some sort of markings on it.  I know markings can be changed but it has to be easier then an unmarked white van.  Just a thought.

you figure this... a van is the easiest place to conceal someone tied up, etc.  AND at the same time if it is a WHITE VAN it is the least likely to ID in comparison with any other color.  white van describes a million vehicles... so that is probably why they use them. 


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3
Post by: doubledecker on July 30, 2009, 01:50:26 PM
i think its highly possible that adam campbell is not involved at all in any of this, however is aware of the child ring going through the different states and wants to bring that information to light as a possibility of what happened to lindsey so that someone would investigate it

I believe adam was trying to tell what he knows.  he was taking a lot of effort to make sure someone understood.  I hope someone really did pay attention to him and not just write it off.  I do hope he is sitting with the police and they are taking him seriously.  If not, I believe they lost a very valuable person who can possibly help them to understand what is going on.


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3
Post by: Tamikosmom on July 30, 2009, 02:02:13 PM
Considering the following ... why was a ten year old little girl ... with no means to defend herself ... put at risk by being allowed to walk the streets of McCleary without adult supervision.

Janet

++++++

mlachester 2 hours ago wrote:

I am close to her and I know a lot more than the media or law enforcement are saying right now. As for Scanner, sorry if you don't like the truth but I have never been one to keep the truth in and she should of been taken the first time she called 911 from my house asking for help instead of put in a police car and taken back to her abuser!"

http://www.king5.com/topstories/stor...omments_anchor


mlachester 1 day ago wrote:
Also people need to know Lindsey had told a friend a white car had been folling her and that another 11 year old girl was also talked to by someone a=in a white car the guy tryed to get her in by going as far as telling her she could drive the car. She ran and told her mom and yes the police knows this too.

http://www.king5.com/topstories/stor...omments_anchor


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3
Post by: JessStar on July 30, 2009, 02:16:29 PM
Considering the following ... why was a ten year old little girl ... with no means to defend herself ... put at risk by being allowed to walk the streets of McCleary without adult supervision.

Janet

++++++

mlachester 2 hours ago wrote:

I am close to her and I know a lot more than the media or law enforcement are saying right now. As for Scanner, sorry if you don't like the truth but I have never been one to keep the truth in and she should of been taken the first time she called 911 from my house asking for help instead of put in a police car and taken back to her abuser!"

http://www.king5.com/topstories/stor...omments_anchor


mlachester 1 day ago wrote:
Also people need to know Lindsey had told a friend a white car had been folling her and that another 11 year old girl was also talked to by someone a=in a white car the guy tryed to get her in by going as far as telling her she could drive the car. She ran and told her mom and yes the police knows this too.

http://www.king5.com/topstories/stor...omments_anchor


IIRC, this poster has been substantially discredited.


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3
Post by: JessStar on July 30, 2009, 02:17:38 PM
Considering the following ... why was a ten year old little girl ... with no means to defend herself ... put at risk by being allowed to walk the streets of McCleary without adult supervision.

Janet

++++++

mlachester 2 hours ago wrote:

I am close to her and I know a lot more than the media or law enforcement are saying right now. As for Scanner, sorry if you don't like the truth but I have never been one to keep the truth in and she should of been taken the first time she called 911 from my house asking for help instead of put in a police car and taken back to her abuser!"

http://www.king5.com/topstories/stor...omments_anchor


mlachester 1 day ago wrote:
Also people need to know Lindsey had told a friend a white car had been folling her and that another 11 year old girl was also talked to by someone a=in a white car the guy tryed to get her in by going as far as telling her she could drive the car. She ran and told her mom and yes the police knows this too.

http://www.king5.com/topstories/stor...omments_anchor


SELF EDIT:   IIRC, this poster (mlachester)has been substantially discredited.



Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3
Post by: Nut44x4 on July 30, 2009, 02:20:19 PM
KLAAS.....I am not stalking you  ::MonkeyDevil:: I am checking all the active threads, lmaoooo  ::MonkeySlide::


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3
Post by: Edward on July 30, 2009, 02:22:19 PM
Although I live in an AG area .. As the Monterey bay area of California is an AG area..
I do not see many White or European migrant workers today.
Most are from Mexico, central America, South America, Portugal and some others.
   
Although my next door neighbor has his father living with him who was in fact is a white migrant worker from the 40s-50's and very American. They came across years ago from North Dakota all the way to the west coast as migrant workers and even living in there car with the kids.. He is 70 years old now.. Listening to his story is really a "Grapes of Wrath story" which is about European and other immigrants as well as poor class Americans who were in fact white and did in fact do migrant work in the 20's -60's here in the Monterey bay area and a gentleman named Steinbeck who was grouchy old man and who was a writer, wrote some stories about them ..
I have talked with many people who knew Steinbeck.As many did.. who are all now in there 80's
We also have the Steinbeck center in Salinas Ca. if any of you want to know about him.. I have never been inside of it but I bet it is educational..

IF there is a sub culture of Caucasian Migrant farm workers today I have not come across any of them except for the Truck Drivers that haul the finished products shipped out of Coolers after the products are picked and boxed in the fields and taken to the coolers.
For the most part Mexican farm workers are Union workers today and NOT illegal alien workers although I do see some illegals who pick lettuce in Salinas and work in the flower growers hot houses..
Flower growers seem to employ many of them as the Union workers hate them and get really pissy if they are in there fields working.. The union workers actually get into fights with illegals here..
 The illegals are used to pick the cheapest of crops like lettuce and field prep... Not strawberries or Blackberries or high end crops like special grown items.. Union workers pick most of that, as it pays the most..
You always see more crime where the cheap crops are growing too.. Salinas has a high murder rate and they grow most of the lettuce and Watsonville has almost no murder and they grow most of the strawberries and other berries..Which pays the most to the Union pickers..
 When you see the buses show up to a field many times they have illegals in them.
The buses drive around Salinas in the morning and pick up field workers from street corners and pay them cash per day..
 Union workers get a check per week of work.

   


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3
Post by: doubledecker on July 30, 2009, 02:24:02 PM
about the white car in the area.  I have heard many different stories about a white car, from several different locals. 

we all know marylin's one. 

here is another this is coming from someone else.   
 the night she went missing, before she got to mommsen, before she crossed main (not sure exact location) she stopped at xxxxx and xxxxxxx house (i don't know them) she was asking to spend the night, they were having a slumber party.  a white car went by and she flipped out, went white, scared to death.  she asked to stay and they wouldn't let her.


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3
Post by: sherip on July 30, 2009, 02:26:36 PM
Okay DD, I am beginning this new thread.  I should've probably brought it over from Lindsey part 2, but I am going to throw a whole bunch of stuff out here. 

Let's start with Adam's address in Roy.  Let's assume he had a contact there.  I think he did.  I have a strong reason to believe that there's an association between Adam Campbell and this Karl Steven Goering.

This Karl Steven Goering character, an SO, operating under the radar in Kennewick right now. Non-Compliant.  A Karl S. Goering was a detective in Kennewick too, and I am suspecting that it was possibly his father.   I have a whole bunch of stuff on Karl S. Junior that I posted on Lindsey part 2.  Okay, now that Pierce is in McCleary, that brings us back to Roy, cause Roy is in that county.  Stay with me here, I Will get this out.  Just want to post some stats here again on Karl junior.   Address:  6102 Road 68, Kennewick, WaThis should be Pasco Washington.  I have the phone number.  Easy to find.  He married Theresa Ann Forzaglia on Dec 18, 2000.  Child support issues same year.  He's got MS page member #281491802.  Nothing there but a monkey playing a guitar (Is this a slam?)  Another MS member #364234353 with lots and lots of photos.  Born June 18, 1973.  Resembles Adam Lee Campbell, possibly.  Then he's got that fubar page too.  It's in the other thread.  Okay, this is background.

I work in reverse a lot of times.  So, I started in Roy and found that a Dwight Edward Goering used to live in Roy.  He lives in Moses Lake currently.  Address:  1025 Virginia St.  Moses Lake, Wa.  98837.  I have phone too but it's easy to find.  He's on MyLife (formerly Classmates.com I think).  Born September 4, 1962.  Wife Desiree lives at same address.  There's a Donna too, but I believe she lives elsewhere in Washington now. 

On MyLife, Dwight has three friends, one of whom is Theresa Goering in Kennewick, Karl S. Goering Jr's current wife. 

So, this may be Adam's connection from Roy in a round-about way.  I still need to do some snooping around in Roy. 

But, when all is said and done, I think we will find a string of suspects and a string of missing children.  Now, I haven't done this yet, but if we just CONSIDER the possibility that there's a connection here, perhaps the Code (such as it is) may make sense.  I don't know cause I haven't looked at it myself in while.  Do you have the whole message handy to post here again?

Anyway, just more stuff to consider.   :smt120


I want to make a correction to my last post.  the current address for Karl Steven Goering Jr. is in Pasco, Washington.  Not Kennewick, just in case LE of some description in this area wants to pay this guy a visit.

And here's all the information on Dwight Edward Goering and all the places he's lived. 

1      Dwight Goering
Dwight E Goering
Dwight Ed Goering
Dwight Edward Goering
Dwight E Georing
   46
   Address Available    Phone Available    Moses Lake, WA
Roy, WA
Graham, WA
Spanaway, WA
Tahuya, WA
Tacoma, WA
Eatonville, WA
Kennewick, WA
Grandview, WA
   Desiree Lynne Goering
Desiree L Goering
Dwight Edward Goering




Wayne Watne
PO Box 1794
Moses Lake, WA 98837
02/2006

Wayne Watne
4869 Viking Road NE
Moses Lake Wa, 98837-3743
Grant County


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3
Post by: doubledecker on July 30, 2009, 02:27:26 PM
and this is again a totally different person


xxxx was also followed by a white car until, she thinks, he could get a good look at her when she turned around.  she said she worked with the sketch artist on that car.


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3
Post by: doubledecker on July 30, 2009, 02:28:40 PM
and then someone else, totally different person said her daughter was followed by a white car


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3
Post by: no rose colored glasses on July 30, 2009, 02:30:07 PM
and then someone else, totally different person said her daughter was followed by a white car
Just so I'm clear, there were several people in town, saying about a white car?


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3
Post by: AZSunny on July 30, 2009, 02:33:59 PM
about the white car in the area.  I have heard many different stories about a white car, from several different locals. 

we all know marylin's one. 

here is another this is coming from someone else.   
 the night she went missing, before she got to mommsen, before she crossed main (not sure exact location) she stopped at xxxxx and xxxxxxx house (i don't know them) she was asking to spend the night, they were having a slumber party.  a white car went by and she flipped out, went white, scared to death.  she asked to stay and they wouldn't let her.

So this is another group of girls she wanted to spend the night with, before she asked about KK's daughter spendng the night.  I wonder if it were the girls she had been swimming with all day that have the house across the street from the Shell station?


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3
Post by: doubledecker on July 30, 2009, 02:37:37 PM
Although I live in an AG area .. As the Monterey bay area of California is an AG area..
I do not see many White or European migrant workers today.
Most are from Mexico, central America, South America, Portugal and some others.
   
Although my next door neighbor has his father living with him who was in fact is a white migrant worker from the 40s-50's and very American. They came across years ago from North Dakota all the way to the west coast as migrant workers and even living in there car with the kids.. He is 70 years old now.. Listening to his story is really a "Grapes of Wrath story" which is about European and other immigrants as well as poor class Americans who were in fact white and did in fact do migrant work in the 20's -60's here in the Monterey bay area and a gentleman named Steinbeck who was grouchy old man and who was a writer, wrote some stories about them ..
I have talked with many people who knew Steinbeck.As many did.. who are all now in there 80's
We also have the Steinbeck center in Salinas Ca. if any of you want to know about him.. I have never been inside of it but I bet it is educational..

IF there is a sub culture of Caucasian Migrant farm workers today I have not come across any of them except for the Truck Drivers that haul the finished products shipped out of Coolers after the products are picked and boxed in the fields and taken to the coolers.
For the most part Mexican farm workers are Union workers today and NOT illegal alien workers although I do see some illegals who pick lettuce in Salinas and work in the flower growers hot houses..
Flower growers seem to employ many of them as the Union workers hate them and get really pissy if they are in there fields working.. The union workers actually get into fights with illegals here..
 The illegals are used to pick the cheapest of crops like lettuce and field prep... Not strawberries or Blackberries or high end crops like special grown items.. Union workers pick most of that, as it pays the most..
You always see more crime where the cheap crops are growing too.. Salinas has a high murder rate and they grow most of the lettuce and Watsonville has almost no murder and they grow most of the strawberries and other berries..Which pays the most to the Union pickers..
 When you see the buses show up to a field many times they have illegals in them.
The buses drive around Salinas in the morning and pick up field workers from street corners and pay them cash per day..
 Union workers get a check per week of work.

   

these white groups usually stay in the orchard fruit.  the apples and cherries and pears then to florida to the oranges and grapefruit.  in between this group will go to az to the cotton gin.  they will do the cherries in cali, but for the most part they do not work in cali, just the early cherries in linden/by stockton. sometimes they end up in the strawberries in oregon, they don't end up in the other areas.  Its a "route" they have traveled for decades.

I know the police were told about this years ago, they did not do a dang thing about it, so... what does that tell you


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3
Post by: doubledecker on July 30, 2009, 02:39:04 PM
and then someone else, totally different person said her daughter was followed by a white car
Just so I'm clear, there were several people in town, saying about a white car?

yes these are all different people with different incidences.  Now these are locals saying this.  you know how the local rumor mill can spin. but this is what I have been told.  but with this many people saying it, you would think there really is a white car following people.


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3
Post by: JessStar on July 30, 2009, 02:39:54 PM
about the white car in the area.  I have heard many different stories about a white car, from several different locals. 

we all know marylin's one. 

here is another this is coming from someone else.   
 the night she went missing, before she got to mommsen, before she crossed main (not sure exact location) she stopped at xxxxx and xxxxxxx house (i don't know them) she was asking to spend the night, they were having a slumber party.  a white car went by and she flipped out, went white, scared to death.  she asked to stay and they wouldn't let her.

So this is another group of girls she wanted to spend the night with, before she asked about KK's daughter spendng the night.  I wonder if it were the girls she had been swimming with all day that have the house across the street from the Shell station?

Did this happen BEFORE or AFTER she left KK's house?  I'm a bit confused, because I thought the only time she was alone that day was when she left KK's house at 9:15.  This post suggests that she spoke with someone immediately before she went missing, which is news to me.  I haven't heard that before.



Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3
Post by: doubledecker on July 30, 2009, 02:42:06 PM
about the white car in the area.  I have heard many different stories about a white car, from several different locals. 

we all know marylin's one. 

here is another this is coming from someone else.   
 the night she went missing, before she got to mommsen, before she crossed main (not sure exact location) she stopped at xxxxx and xxxxxxx house (i don't know them) she was asking to spend the night, they were having a slumber party.  a white car went by and she flipped out, went white, scared to death.  she asked to stay and they wouldn't let her.

So this is another group of girls she wanted to spend the night with, before she asked about KK's daughter spendng the night.  I wonder if it were the girls she had been swimming with all day that have the house across the street from the Shell station?

now keep in mind this is the local rumor mill I call it.  I have no reason to believe the people are lying, but I have no way of knowing if they are telling the truth or mistaken or they heard it here or there or what, but here it the rumor mill info

it is someone on maple street.  I have the names but I am not going to post them.  one person said it was at their house, another said no it was not at their house but at someone elses house on that street.  but it was on maple street.  both said it was on maple, just at different people's houses. 


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3
Post by: Edward on July 30, 2009, 02:46:13 PM
DoubleDecker
That is very interesting as that is exactly what my next door neighbors father picked when he came to Watsonville "Apples" As Martinelli Apple cider is made here..
Farmers got paid far more for Berries and one by one over the years most of the Orchards were removed and made into Berry fields as Orchards crop is a one time a year crop..
So you are saying they are all still working and follow orchard crops.. 
Very interesting and educational and it makes sense why I do not see them here..
Thank You


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3
Post by: doubledecker on July 30, 2009, 02:46:48 PM
about the white car in the area.  I have heard many different stories about a white car, from several different locals. 

we all know marylin's one. 

here is another this is coming from someone else.   
 the night she went missing, before she got to mommsen, before she crossed main (not sure exact location) she stopped at xxxxx and xxxxxxx house (i don't know them) she was asking to spend the night, they were having a slumber party.  a white car went by and she flipped out, went white, scared to death.  she asked to stay and they wouldn't let her.

So this is another group of girls she wanted to spend the night with, before she asked about KK's daughter spendng the night.  I wonder if it were the girls she had been swimming with all day that have the house across the street from the Shell station?

Did this happen BEFORE or AFTER she left KK's house?  I'm a bit confused, because I thought the only time she was alone that day was when she left KK's house at 9:15.  This post suggests that she spoke with someone immediately before she went missing, which is news to me.  I haven't heard that before.



I have a lot of info that I stick in a file called the "local rumor mill".  I just leave the info there until something pops up that might have something to do with it.  I don't post this as FACT, I post it as these are things the locals say.  so it is just like if someone from mccleary came and posted here, we have no idea if what they say is true or not, we either believe them or we don't.  so I just stick this info in a file and try to figure out if it is true or not.  I don't see any reason people would make up the same lies. so that is all I can say about it. 

one person said this happened after she left kara's, I can't say what the other person said. 


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3
Post by: Tamikosmom on July 30, 2009, 02:50:41 PM
Considering the following ... why was a ten year old little girl ... with no means to defend herself ... put at risk by being allowed to walk the streets of McCleary without adult supervision.

Janet

++++++

mlachester 2 hours ago wrote:

I am close to her and I know a lot more than the media or law enforcement are saying right now. As for Scanner, sorry if you don't like the truth but I have never been one to keep the truth in and she should of been taken the first time she called 911 from my house asking for help instead of put in a police car and taken back to her abuser!"

http://www.king5.com/topstories/stor...omments_anchor


mlachester 1 day ago wrote:
Also people need to know Lindsey had told a friend a white car had been folling her and that another 11 year old girl was also talked to by someone a=in a white car the guy tryed to get her in by going as far as telling her she could drive the car. She ran and told her mom and yes the police knows this too.

http://www.king5.com/topstories/stor...omments_anchor


IIRC, this poster has been substantially discredited.


IIRC ... it was only Kara Kampen who discredited this poster who did not hide her identity when commenting.  When you consider that this poster who did not hide her identity revealed that 911 was called in regards to an incident ... I find her words very credible.  Somebody who does not hide her identity is not going to involve LE in fabrications ... a source that can be easily verify the truth the one way or another.

IMO

Janet

++++++

Residents of McCleary Speak Out

mlachester 1 day ago wrote:


To answer the questions everyone has asked, Yes I have talked to police and as far as things being unfounded its more of lazy work by cps and I don't know what the police were thinking. Since Lindsey has gone missing I have helped serch and put fliers up. I was called by the agents investigating and told them what I know. And this is no nick name everyone in McCleary knows who I am. Its no big secret she had came to my house to call 911 when her brother had done things to her. I hope lindsey is hiding and she finds a way to get to someone for help to tell them why. But as everyday gose by the fear gets worse.

http://www.king5.com/topstories/stories/NW_063009WAB-Mccleary-girl-search-LJ.1fc0b759.html?ocp=2#slcgm_comments_anchor


mlachester 2 hours ago wrote:

I am close to her and I know a lot more than the media or law enforcement are saying right now. … Sorry if you don't like the truth but I have never been one to keep the truth in and she should of been taken the first time she called 911 from my house asking for help instead of put in a police car and taken back to her abuser!"

http://www.king5.com/topstories/stor...omments_anchor


mamahead 13 hours ago wrote:
 
Lindsey has been afraid of her brother for a very long time. He has threatned her many times. Where is she? And why is the mother not crazy with sadness or emotion. Show us some tears. The friend that Lindsey was last with shows more emotion than the mother. And why was the brother begging for money for fireworks at his little sisters candlelight vigil?

http://www.king5.com/topstories/stories/NW_070609WAB-missing-mccleary-girl-SW.14c01624.html


KaraK
Re: Lindsey Baum, 10y missing from McCleary, WA 6/26/09
« Reply #1762 on: July 09, 2009, 12:42:02 AM
»

*** Does Lindsey's brother have a standing reputation in the community ??

Yes, not a real good one - with the kids at least. I have not met anyone who claims to be his friend.

http://scaredmonkeys.net/index.php?topic=5541.msg870856#msg870856

Kara Kampen – Mother of Lindsey’s friend Michaela


KaraK
Re: Lindsey Baum, 10y missing from McCleary, WA 6/26/09
« Reply #1602 on: July 08, 2009, 01:51:08 AM »


Lindsey's brother has a temper but to seriously hurt her I do not think so -  I've seen them fight and argue numerous times and know he gets mad for a minute and then he's over it. They both are a bit temperamental but he especially thinks highly of Lindsey and nothing in me since she's gone missing made me think he was any way involved. - Now that is just my gut feeling topped with the lack of any form of transportation.

http://scaredmonkeys.net/index.php?topic=5541.msg869280;topicseen#msg869280

Kara Kampen – Mother of Lindsey’s friend Michaela.


KaraK
Re: Lindsey Baum, 10y missing from McCleary, WA 6/26/09
« Reply #1809 on: July 09, 2009, 04:33:45 AM »


Josh had gotten into so many spats that honestly were in a large part things he did not start but because he was the oldest he was the one who got in trouble. I've set down kids I've never met before to have a talk with them because I heard that they were antagonizing him to see if he'd blow up.

http://scaredmonkeys.net/index.php?topic=5541.msg871164;topicseen#msg871164

Kara Kampen – Mother of Lindsey’s friend Michaela.


KaraK
Re: Lindsey Baum, 10y missing from McCleary, WA 6/26/09
« Reply #1795 on: July 09, 2009, 03:13:01 AM »


I am no Dr and I never dug but he does take medication for some condition - more mental than physical. He is not what kids would call "cool" and strikes you as being younger than he actually is if you talk to him. He came over a few times and we'd talk about something and he'd start jabbering about something completely off topic - when we were all out looking for Lindsey I was trying to talk to him about where we'd already looked and he just wanted to know if my son could come over the next day. So I guess you could say unfocused.

http://scaredmonkeys.net/index.php?topic=5541.msg871046;topicseen#msg871046

Kara Kampen – Mother of Lindsey’s friend Michaela


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3
Post by: doubledecker on July 30, 2009, 02:52:15 PM
DoubleDecker
That is very interesting as that is exactly what my next door neighbors father picked when he came to Watsonville "Apples" As Martinelli Apple cider is made here..
Farmers got paid far more for Berries and one by one over the years most of the Orchards were removed and made into Berry fields as Orchards crop is a one time a year crop..
So you are saying they are all still working and follow orchard crops.. 
Very interesting and educational and it makes sense why I do not see them here..
Thank You

a lot of the younger generation of these people have stopped the circuit but there are some still do.  And some have died now but others still do it.  it is a close knit group, they marry into one another's familes etc, heck some marry their own cousins.  STILL, not back in the 1800's when that was common.  the group is still very intact.  kids have grown up thinking they are really part of that family, but they aren't, they are stolen kids.  crazy. several years ago someone told it all, but nothing done about it.  it's amazing what goes on and no one cares.


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3
Post by: JessStar on July 30, 2009, 03:01:55 PM
about the white car in the area.  I have heard many different stories about a white car, from several different locals. 

we all know marylin's one. 

here is another this is coming from someone else.   
 the night she went missing, before she got to mommsen, before she crossed main (not sure exact location) she stopped at xxxxx and xxxxxxx house (i don't know them) she was asking to spend the night, they were having a slumber party.  a white car went by and she flipped out, went white, scared to death.  she asked to stay and they wouldn't let her.

So this is another group of girls she wanted to spend the night with, before she asked about KK's daughter spendng the night.  I wonder if it were the girls she had been swimming with all day that have the house across the street from the Shell station?

Did this happen BEFORE or AFTER she left KK's house?  I'm a bit confused, because I thought the only time she was alone that day was when she left KK's house at 9:15.  This post suggests that she spoke with someone immediately before she went missing, which is news to me.  I haven't heard that before.



I have a lot of info that I stick in a file called the "local rumor mill".  I just leave the info there until something pops up that might have something to do with it.  I don't post this as FACT, I post it as these are things the locals say.  so it is just like if someone from mccleary came and posted here, we have no idea if what they say is true or not, we either believe them or we don't.  so I just stick this info in a file and try to figure out if it is true or not.  I don't see any reason people would make up the same lies. so that is all I can say about it. 

one person said this happened after she left kara's, I can't say what the other person said.  

You don't need to...I think I have a pretty good idea.


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3
Post by: doubledecker on July 30, 2009, 03:02:49 PM
about the white car in the area.  I have heard many different stories about a white car, from several different locals. 

we all know marylin's one. 

here is another this is coming from someone else.   
 the night she went missing, before she got to mommsen, before she crossed main (not sure exact location) she stopped at xxxxx and xxxxxxx house (i don't know them) she was asking to spend the night, they were having a slumber party.  a white car went by and she flipped out, went white, scared to death.  she asked to stay and they wouldn't let her.

So this is another group of girls she wanted to spend the night with, before she asked about KK's daughter spendng the night.  I wonder if it were the girls she had been swimming with all day that have the house across the street from the Shell station?

Did this happen BEFORE or AFTER she left KK's house?  I'm a bit confused, because I thought the only time she was alone that day was when she left KK's house at 9:15.  This post suggests that she spoke with someone immediately before she went missing, which is news to me.  I haven't heard that before.



I have a lot of info that I stick in a file called the "local rumor mill".  I just leave the info there until something pops up that might have something to do with it.  I don't post this as FACT, I post it as these are things the locals say.  so it is just like if someone from mccleary came and posted here, we have no idea if what they say is true or not, we either believe them or we don't.  so I just stick this info in a file and try to figure out if it is true or not.  I don't see any reason people would make up the same lies. so that is all I can say about it. 

one person said this happened after she left kara's, I can't say what the other person said.  

You don't need to...I think I have a pretty good idea.
oKay Kool


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3
Post by: no rose colored glasses on July 30, 2009, 03:20:44 PM
and then someone else, totally different person said her daughter was followed by a white car
Just so I'm clear, there were several people in town, saying about a white car?

yes these are all different people with different incidences.  Now these are locals saying this.  you know how the local rumor mill can spin. but this is what I have been told.  but with this many people saying it, you would think there really is a white car following people.
Thank-you, yes this to me is very important info.


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3
Post by: sunshine12 on July 30, 2009, 03:33:23 PM
i believe that if lindsey's face turned white as a ghost after she saw the white car drive by and was told 'no' to another sleepover, she must have known this person or been afraid to tell someone that they were following her, maybe she thought she'd get in trouble? i dont know...im trying to wrap my mind around this case.

did these eye witnesses say it was a car or a truck?


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3
Post by: AZSunny on July 30, 2009, 03:35:07 PM
i believe that if lindsey's face turned white as a ghost after she saw the white car drive by and was told 'no' to another sleepover, she must have known this person or been afraid to tell someone that they were following her, maybe she thought she'd get in trouble? i dont know...im trying to wrap my mind around this case.

did these eye witnesses say it was a car or a truck?

or possibly a van.


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3
Post by: no rose colored glasses on July 30, 2009, 03:39:49 PM
i believe that if lindsey's face turned white as a ghost after she saw the white car drive by and was told 'no' to another sleepover, she must have known this person or been afraid to tell someone that they were following her, maybe she thought she'd get in trouble? i dont know...im trying to wrap my mind around this case.

did these eye witnesses say it was a car or a truck?

or possibly a van.
What I'm try to figure out, is if this little girl was so frightened by this white car, I wonder why she didn't say something to the parent at the second home she went to that night, or ask if someone would walk home with her. So now this is two different set of people that let a 10 year old walk home alone.


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3
Post by: doubledecker on July 30, 2009, 03:45:47 PM
i believe that if lindsey's face turned white as a ghost after she saw the white car drive by and was told 'no' to another sleepover, she must have known this person or been afraid to tell someone that they were following her, maybe she thought she'd get in trouble? i dont know...im trying to wrap my mind around this case.

did these eye witnesses say it was a car or a truck?

they all call it a white car



there is another rumor mill story about a  pickup; a sharp looking metallic tan color, late 80's model with an egg-shell colored canopy (as described);

pickup about 200 feet back on this little logging road type of thing, two women see the truck after they see a man in the bushes the day after lindsey is missing.  this is on 1st and deck, (1st called "old dusty").  they try to talk loud to get the man to come out, he gets quiet they can't figure out where he went, then they run into the truck parked right there, so they tell the police, police tells them to write it all down on a piece of paper he gives them, they want him to go look now so the man can't drive off, he doesn't. 

the guy was stocky guy in light brown, light brown shorts, light brown shirt, light brown baseball cap. about 5'8" or a little taller.

now these are just stories I here, for all I know they could be all mixed up

i need to go, I have to go run town errands ugh. bbl


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3
Post by: doubledecker on July 30, 2009, 03:47:30 PM
i believe that if lindsey's face turned white as a ghost after she saw the white car drive by and was told 'no' to another sleepover, she must have known this person or been afraid to tell someone that they were following her, maybe she thought she'd get in trouble? i dont know...im trying to wrap my mind around this case.

did these eye witnesses say it was a car or a truck?

or possibly a van.
What I'm try to figure out, is if this little girl was so frightened by this white car, I wonder why she didn't say something to the parent at the second home she went to that night, or ask if someone would walk home with her. So now this is two different set of people that let a 10 year old walk home alone.

they knew she was afraid, how else would they know she saw the car and flipped out turned white and was scared to death.  they sent her off anyway!!!!  whoever actually did it... according to someone


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3
Post by: doubledecker on July 30, 2009, 03:51:12 PM
so one more thing "I" am thinking here

maybe she really did start down maple, get scared and double back on 6th to get away from this car?  that would explain why the dog trailing at first ended up on 6th and stopped and it would have been the freshest scent so that would make it to where the maple trail would not count. 



Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3
Post by: doubledecker on July 30, 2009, 03:51:52 PM
ok I am going to be late for appt. if I don't get off of here. bbl


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3
Post by: no rose colored glasses on July 30, 2009, 04:16:54 PM
Why in the world would a 10 year old be wanting to find a place to spend the night. Was she afraid to go home? Was she in trouble at home? Was she not getting along at home, so she is out asking to spend the night. Something is not right with this.


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3
Post by: Rob on July 30, 2009, 04:39:14 PM
by this point, I would have to believe that all these rumor mill stories have been checked out. It's been a month.

I also believe the police when they say they don't have much to go on and no particular direction... although, they say someone local.

That's hard to believe as almost everyone in the town and the surrounding counties seems to have been cleared and there is no POI or focal point. There are only 1500 people in town and only so many would have access to Lindsey and a chance for a clear cut get-a-way.

As all the people in town are seemingly accounted for and none seem to be exhibiting a change in behavior or suddenly quitting a job, that would indicate that if Lindsey was taken by a townie - she's deceased and no one is tending to her care.

With child abductors, the child is killed with in 3 hours in about 75% of the cases... sorry to say so and my intend is not to be insensitive. Just stating the fact.

Also with child abduction, the abductor can not replace that abducted child very easily. So they sometime do tend to keep the child alive and Shawn Hornbeck is a prime example. Although Shawn was likely to be re-placed by Ben Ownsby but none the less, Shawn was kept alive for about 4-5 years.

In my humble opinion, it doesn't have the hallmarks of a local to me. With only so many people who would abduct and only so many likely suspects with access to THE abduction, it seems more than likely to me that this someone not from the area and that's the main reason why the case is still unsolved.

I know that there are those that think someone knows something and has kept that info confidential. For me, that's hard to believe at this point. Someone usually say something and there are more than enough people willing to speak to strangers on a message board. So, people are talking but the leads are not producing anything so far to date.

 


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3
Post by: Tamikosmom on July 30, 2009, 04:50:06 PM
Why in the world would a 10 year old be wanting to find a place to spend the night. Was she afraid to go home? Was she in trouble at home? Was she not getting along at home, so she is out asking to spend the night. Something is not right with this.

I am 62 years of age and ... I can remember collaborating with friends regarding spending the night at each others home ... regarding how were going to convince our parents.  Sleepovers were fun.

The only part of the scenario that bothers me is the adults who made choices for a ten year old that were not in her best interest.  There is no way I would send any ten year old away from my home to walk the streets defenceless against the dangers that lurk.

It did not concern Kara Kampen or Scott Williams who sent Lindsey on her way and it did not concern Melissa Baum as long as Lindsey met her ten o'clock curfrew.  For crying out loud ... my 11 year old grandson is in bed at 10:00 PM ... not walking the streets of town unsupervised.

Janet

++++

KARA KAMPEN

The Daily World - July 3, 2009


McCLEARY — Kara Kampen said she thought nothing of it when Lindsey Baum walked out of her house at about 9:15 p.m. last Friday.

http://**/articles/2009/07/03/local_news/doc4a4e415cdb51d302573546.txt


SCOTT WILLIAMS

KOMO News - June 28, 2009


Lindsey was going to walk the four blocks to her home on Mommsen Road, which is roughly a 10-minute walk. But something happened in that short distance - Lindsey never arrived home ...

The friend's father, Scott Williams, said he asked Lindsey to go home before it got too dark.

"She was here 10, 15 minutes, and then, you know, we said, 'You should probably get going before it gets dark,' and that was the last we heard of her," he said.

Witnesses say Lindsey seemed normal as she headed out around 9:15.

http://www.komonews.com/news/local/49383897.html


MELISSA BAUM

Where is Lindsey Baum? Police, FBI Search for 10-Year-Old
Girl's Mother Frantic After Lindsey Never Made it Home From a Friend's House
By SARAH NETTER
June 30, 2009


Baum said her children began squabbling over the use of Josh's bike on the way there and were stopped by a family friend who sent Josh home to end the argument. Lindsey continued on to her friend's house. When Lindsey's friend found out she couldn't stay the night, Lindsey headed for home around 9:30 p.m.

"When she wasn't home by 10, I started to get nervous," Baum said, adding that 10 p.m. is the curfew for her children.
 
http://abcnews.go.com/US/story?id=7966924&page=1


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3
Post by: Edward on July 30, 2009, 05:00:02 PM
You are so correct Rob on all of what you wrote..
 People do not want to hear the facts but they are the facts.. Stranger abductions.. 75% 3 hours, dead. The perp is driven by fear of getting caught and suffers from guilt and he murders the victim to take away both from his conscience..

Shawn and Ben situations is a rare events ... The family wants to hang on to that hope.
I would too. Anybody would.

 I myself will discount the white car until we hear an official report or a witness on news media telling everyone that she was going house to house looking for some place to sleep over and or she was afraid of a car and especially that part of her face turning white as a ghost..
It all sounds crazy.. It Prolly is..

We have neighbors of hers, they are here and posting, not one of them has made such a claim..
The only part I have read is that her brother has fits and that she was in fear of him..
Once I had seen his picture I have doubts about that also..

Although her acting older then what she is and being on the Internet with such claims is alarming... Still, I think this was a stranger abduction or somebody she knew as an acquaintance..
 I have doubts she would just get into a vehicle. But many of the abduction attempts near Escondido were near force or were by force and somebody could have just grabber Lindsey right off a street corner.
 It happens to adult women and I am sure it could happen to a child with ease and in seconds.






Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3
Post by: no rose colored glasses on July 30, 2009, 05:02:26 PM
I hear what you are saying, and slumber parties were fun. This seems more to me that Lindsey just didn't want to go home. After not being able to sleep at her friends house, it just seems odd she would go to another friend's house to sleep over. But what is even stranger is two sets of adults didn't even think to walk this child home  ::MonkeyNoNo::


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3
Post by: JessStar on July 30, 2009, 05:16:12 PM


With child abductors, the child is killed with in 3 hours in about 75% of the cases... sorry to say so and my intend is not to be insensitive. Just stating the fact.
 

This needs some clarification because in a vacuum, this statistic is misleading.  What the statistic says is that OF THOSE CHILDREN WHO ARE ABDUCTED AND MURDERED, 75% of them have been murdered within 3 hours. It doesn't say that 75% of children who are abducted are murdered within 3 hours.  On the contrary, according to the Department of Justice statistics, 60% of children who are abducted by strangers are found alive.

Now, all of these statistics need to be tempered by the motivation behind the abduction.  As the motivation becomes more sinister, the likelihood that the child will be murdered increases.



Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3
Post by: rebelgirl901 on July 30, 2009, 05:17:29 PM
about the white car in the area.  I have heard many different stories about a white car, from several different locals. 

we all know marylin's one. 

here is another this is coming from someone else.   
 the night she went missing, before she got to mommsen, before she crossed main (not sure exact location) she stopped at xxxxx and xxxxxxx house (i don't know them) she was asking to spend the night, they were having a slumber party.  a white car went by and she flipped out, went white, scared to death.  she asked to stay and they wouldn't let her.

This is very disturbing.  We hear from Lindsey's mom that she is terrified of the dark so you would think that since she was walking home 1/2 mile, 4 blocks, 6 blocks, whatever the distance and it was getting close to dark that she would be getting home as quickly as possible to avoid being out after dark.  Also, she has a 10 o'clock curfew and it's already after 9.  Why in this world is she at another persons house asking to spend the night?  Does she go all over town asking people if she can spend the night?  hmmmmm

Let's see...perhaps she leaves KK's house after being told she cannot spend the night, she's heading down maple toward her house and spots the white car that she has seen around town and she gets spooked, she turns around and heads back towards this other friends house to see if she can spend the night there and they tell her no.  Now she is alone again with this white car following her and nobody will let her stay over.  Poor girl, she must have been terrified.   Now this makes me angry.   They could see she was frightened but yet they turned her away to walk home all alone and it's nearly dark.  I myself have taken children home when I have learned they would be alone.  This is just heartbreaking.  This poor girl was scared and no one to help her.  I wonder if she ever mentioned to anyone that someone in a white car was following her?  Did she not think to ask someone to take her home?  This really bothers me.  If it had been me, I would have either let her stay or drove her home or at least walked home with her to make sure she was safe.  WOW!  I'm sorry but I just don't understand.  :smt089


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3
Post by: AZSunny on July 30, 2009, 05:19:33 PM
You are so correct Rob on all of what you wrote..
 People do not want to hear the facts but they are the facts.. Stranger abductions.. 75% 3 hours, dead. The perp is driven by fear of getting caught and suffers from guilt and he murders the victim to take away both from his conscience..

Shawn and Ben situations is a rare events ... The family wants to hang on to that hope.
I would too. Anybody would.

 I myself will discount the white car until we hear an official report or a witness on news media telling everyone that she was going house to house looking for some place to sleep over and or she was afraid of a car and especially that part of her face turning white as a ghost..
It all sounds crazy.. It Prolly is..

We have neighbors of hers, they are here and posting, not one of them has made such a claim..
The only part I have read is that her brother has fits and that she was in fear of him..
Once I had seen his picture I have doubts about that also..

Although her acting older then what she is and being on the Internet with such claims is alarming... Still, I think this was a stranger abduction or somebody she knew as an acquaintance..
 I have doubts she would just get into a vehicle. But many of the abduction attempts near Escondido were near force or were by force and somebody could have just grabber Lindsey right off a street corner.
 It happens to adult women and I am sure it could happen to a child with ease and in seconds.






One of my  concerns is she was on the internet, and had posted on myspace (at 10 years old!)  She posted on a 20 year old males myspace site, and he lived in McCleary. (it had tons of Mickey Mouse stuff on it, as I recall)  I think her website name on myspace was Defender.  Which struck me as an odd choice of names.  (I read that somewhere,  and I believe that is what I saw on myspace,so if I am wrong about the name, please tell me.)  I did see the posting on the 20 year olds myspace.  Nothing alarming just a posting.  Maybe I am not hip, but my 10 year old daugher does not have a myspace account, nor has she heard of such things.  She plays on a Webkins account that is protected, that is it.(and only with a parents approval)   Are things changing so much and I am not keeping up? 


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3
Post by: rebelgirl901 on July 30, 2009, 05:20:33 PM
Why in the world would a 10 year old be wanting to find a place to spend the night. Was she afraid to go home? Was she in trouble at home? Was she not getting along at home, so she is out asking to spend the night. Something is not right with this.

That's what I'm thinking now after reading that see stopped at another persons house and asked to spend the night.  It seems as though she did not want to go home.  That is sad.


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3
Post by: Rob on July 30, 2009, 05:22:03 PM


With child abductors, the child is killed with in 3 hours in about 75% of the cases... sorry to say so and my intend is not to be insensitive. Just stating the fact.
 

This needs some clarification because in a vacuum, this statistic is misleading.  What the statistic says is that OF THOSE CHILDREN WHO ARE ABDUCTED AND MURDERED, 75% of them have been murdered within 3 hours. It doesn't say that 75% of children who are abducted are murdered within 3 hours.  On the contrary, according to the Department of Justice statistics, 60% of children who are abducted by strangers are found alive.

Now, all of these statistics need to be tempered by the motivation behind the abduction.  As the motivation becomes more sinister, the likelihood that the child will be murdered increases.



credit chi-monkey - link in Amber's thread -

http://www.kidsearchnetwork.org/research-statistics.html

The Kidsearch Network believes that Immediate Response by an experienced search team is necessary. because, 1) there is typically over a two hour delay in making the initial missing child report (60%), and 2) the vast majority (74%) of the abducted children who are murdered are dead within three hours of the abduction. (Source: Attorney General of the State of Washington, who did a study of cases reported to law enforcement in 1997)

There are estimated to be about 100 cases per year in the US where a child is abducted and murdered. The victims of these cases are "average" children, leading normal lives, and living with normal families, typical low-risk victims. The vast majority of them are girls (76%), with the average age being slightly over 11 years of age. In 80% of cases, the initial contact between the victim and killer is within 1/4 mile of the victim's residence.

Over half (57%) of these child abduction murders are committed by a killer who is a stranger to the victim. Family involvement in this type of case is infrequent (9%). However, the relationship between the victim and the killer varies with the gender and age of the victim. The youngest females, 1-5 years old, tend to be killed by friends or acquaintances (64%), while the oldest females, 16-17 years old, tend to be killed by strangers (also 64%). The relationship between the killer and victim is different for the male victims. The youngest male victims (1-5 years old) are most likely to be killed by strangers (also 64%), as are the teenage males (13-15 years old, 60% and 16-17 years old, 58%).

The average age of killers of abducted children is around 27 years old. They are predominantly unmarried (85%) and half of them (51%) either live alone (17%) or with their parents (34%). Half of them are unemployed, and those that are employed work in unskilled or semi-skilled labor occupations. Therefore, the killers can generally be characterized as "social marginals."

Almost two-thirds of the killers (61%) had prior arrests for violent crimes, with slightly more than half of the killers' prior crimes (53%) committed against children. The most frequent prior crimes against children were rape (31% of killers) and other sexual assault (45% of killers). Sixty-seven percent of the child abduction murderers' prior crimes were similar in M.O. to the murder that was committed by the same killer.

Commonly, the killers are at the initial victim-killer contact site for a legitimate reason (66%). They either lived in the area (29%) or were engaging in some normal activity. Most of the victims of child abduction murder are victims of opportunity (57%). Only in 14 percent of cases did the killer choose his victim because of some physical characteristic of the victim. The primary motivation for the child abduction murder is sexual assault.

After the victim has been killed, 52 percent of the bodies are concealed to prevent discovery. In only 9% of cases is the body openly placed to insure its discovery.

A unique pattern of distance relationships exists in child abduction murders. The initial contact site is within 1/4 mile of the victim's last known location in 80% of cases. Conversely, the distance between the initial contact site and the murder site increases to distances greater than 1/4 mile (54%). The distance from the murder site to the body recovery site again decreases, to less than 200 feet in 72 percent of cases.

It was discovered that once the murder investigation has begun, the name of the killer is known to the police within the first week in 74% of cases.

While at times the media seems to "get in the way," in the end they are much more likely to have a positive effect on the investigation (31% of cases) than a negative one (6% of cases). In short, the media are more likely to bring witnesses forward than to aid the killer in his escape. The media had no effect at all in 63% of the investigations.

National Estimates of Missing Children (PDF)

Nonfamily Abducted Children: National Estimates and Characteristics (PDF)

Children Abducted by Family Members: National Estimates and Characteristics (PDF)

Runaway/Thrownaway Children: National Estimates and Characteristics (PDF)

Child Abuse and Neglect Statistics and Research

Statistical Data on Statuatory Rape (PDF)

Statistics on Teenagers/Juveniles as Victims (PDF)


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3
Post by: sunshine12 on July 30, 2009, 05:23:31 PM
this case is so frustrating, its so hard for me not to get carried away with all of the information that has been pulled up about adam campbell, and the local rumor mill and really stick with the facts of the case.

i will try to stick with with the ockham's razor (hopefully i spelled that right) theory.  i dont know if this would be beneficial but i am going to go back and read through the first threads and the timelines of the case and start brainstorming again from the FACTS we have (unfortunately they are few and far between)...

i think the FACTS in this case indicate a stranger/aquaintance abduction or unfortunately someone in law enforcement


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3
Post by: JessStar on July 30, 2009, 05:28:22 PM
Rob, you post made my point. It clearly says of those children who are murdered, 75 percent are murdered within 3 hours.


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3
Post by: Tamikosmom on July 30, 2009, 06:03:38 PM
Why in the world would a 10 year old be wanting to find a place to spend the night. Was she afraid to go home? Was she in trouble at home? Was she not getting along at home, so she is out asking to spend the night. Something is not right with this.

That's what I'm thinking now after reading that see stopped at another persons house and asked to spend the night.  It seems as though she did not want to go home.  That is sad.

Where is the info coming from that that Lindsey asked to spend the night at Michaela's home.  According to Michaela's mother the overnighter discussion occured between Lindsey and her daughter on the walk from the Baums.  In other words ... both girls were anticipating a sleepover.  Nothing out of the ordinary.  Nothing "sad".

Janet

+++++

KaraK
Re: Lindsey Baum, 10y missing from McCleary, WA 6/26/09
« Reply #1081 on: July 05, 2009, 04:00:50 AM »

According to my daughter the thought of anyone spending the night at my house was thought up on the way to my house. So, Lindsey's mom would have had reason to be worried when she did not show up by 10ish because she at that time was (to my knowledge) not aware the girls had asked me or were going to ask to spend the night at my house or that I'd said no.  I believe she was under the impression that both girls would be coming back to her house which would take them longer because Kayla has to bring along many outfits if she stays the night.

http://scaredmonkeys.net/index.php?topic=5541.msg864834#msg864834




Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3
Post by: AZSunny on July 30, 2009, 06:11:22 PM
Why in the world would a 10 year old be wanting to find a place to spend the night. Was she afraid to go home? Was she in trouble at home? Was she not getting along at home, so she is out asking to spend the night. Something is not right with this.

That's what I'm thinking now after reading that see stopped at another persons house and asked to spend the night.  It seems as though she did not want to go home.  That is sad.

Where is the info coming from that that Lindsey asked to spend the night at Michaela's home.  According to Michaela's mother the overnighter discussion occured between Lindsey and her daughter on the walk from the Baums.  In other words ... both girls were anticipating a sleepover.  Nothing out of the ordinary.  Nothing "sad".

Janet

+++++

KaraK
Re: Lindsey Baum, 10y missing from McCleary, WA 6/26/09
« Reply #1081 on: July 05, 2009, 04:00:50 AM »

According to my daughter the thought of anyone spending the night at my house was thought up on the way to my house. So, Lindsey's mom would have had reason to be worried when she did not show up by 10ish because she at that time was (to my knowledge) not aware the girls had asked me or were going to ask to spend the night at my house or that I'd said no.  I believe she was under the impression that both girls would be coming back to her house which would take them longer because Kayla has to bring along many outfits if she stays the night.

http://scaredmonkeys.net/index.php?topic=5541.msg864834#msg864834




I think they are talking about her stopping at another friends house asking to spend the night after she left Michaela's.  A request of a second friend. It is rumored she stopped there after leaving Michaels.   


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3
Post by: no rose colored glasses on July 30, 2009, 06:33:07 PM
As of now it is rumored that she stopped at another friend's house after leaving Michaela's house, and that she was scared. And if that is true, what a shame nobody walked her home. I guess what I'm wondering is if that happened was it dark when she left the second friend's house?


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3
Post by: JessStar on July 30, 2009, 06:39:13 PM
If this is true, and people knew she was scared, then shame on the people of McCleary to allow a scared child to walk home alone-especially if they knew or suspected the reason why she was scared. This poor child.


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3
Post by: no rose colored glasses on July 30, 2009, 06:45:30 PM
If this is true, and people knew she was scared, then shame on the people of McCleary to allow a scared child to walk home alone-especially if they knew or suspected the reason why she was scared. This poor child.
It is very hard for me to understand this, I would never have allowed one of my kids friends to walk home alone when they were little. If this is true, I would love to know what Lindsey said when she got to the second home. You would even think the parent might have called Lindsey's mother even to walk over and walk her home.


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3
Post by: JessStar on July 30, 2009, 07:00:54 PM
Exactly Rose. Totally foreign to me. I've taken my little girl's friends home on numerous occasions. Of course, so much is rumor, who knows what to believe.


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3
Post by: doubledecker on July 30, 2009, 07:43:45 PM
I'm back.   when I posted the "local rumor mill" info I was very careful to be sure to say "LOCAL RUMOR MILL" .  I think if someone came on the board to read and came in the middle of this they would start thinking this "IS" (fact) what happened.  I really try not to bring any "rumor mill" info to the board.  I have had and still do have a lot of "rumor mill" info and this is the first time I have shared any of it.  I don't like "rumor mill" info unless it starts to add up to other things in the case that it might substaniate.  I pe

rsonally do not want to start rumors. 

I think perhaps when we discuss the "rumor mill" info we might want to ALWAY add "rumor mill" info.  If we don't it will get a few pages down the line and others will read it and start saying it as fact.  ugh. 

but like it said, it is the same if someone from mccleary comes to the board and posts, it's still rumor really.  whether they post it on the board or they email it to me, it is all the same, so I thought perhaps I should share the "rumor mill" info.  Now I am not so sure. 
gee sorry and hope no one gets confused. 

perhaps I should have never said anything... ugh...



Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3
Post by: KarmaRoundUp on July 30, 2009, 07:50:41 PM
Police chase leads on missing McCleary girl

Searchers returned to the streets of McCleary under a brutal sun Tuesday to follow up on new leads in the hunt for 11-year-old Lindsey Baum, according to The Daily World of Aberdeen.

About 25 officers and searchers with dogs braved near-record temperatures to re-canvass areas of town, Grays Harbor Undersheriff Rick Scott said.

A recent $6,000 reward for information in the missing girl’s case has produced a new wave of tips, Scott said. Surrounding law enforcement agencies including the Thurston County Sheriff’s Office and the Aberdeen Police Department sent officers to help perform follow-up searches and interviews.

About six core investigators have been leading the effort to find Lindsey, who disappeared while walking a few blocks home June 26. The detectives have found no evidence explaining the 4-foot-9, brown-haired girl’s disappearance, but they continue sorting through thousands of tips.

Officers and volunteers knocked on doors throughout town Tuesday, asking new questions and trying to reach people missed in previous interviews, Scott said.

Two teams with cadaver search dogs also roamed the town, he said, but the hot conditions limited the available scents and quickly wore out the dogs.

Scott said detectives and extra officers expect to follow up on new tips in town for at least the rest of the week. He asked anyone with any potentially helpful information to call 866-915-8299.

http://www.thenewstribune.com/partners/theolympian/story/827963.html


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3
Post by: AZSunny on July 30, 2009, 08:03:36 PM
I'm back.   when I posted the "local rumor mill" info I was very careful to be sure to say "LOCAL RUMOR MILL" .  I think if someone came on the board to read and came in the middle of this they would start thinking this "IS" (fact) what happened.  I really try not to bring any "rumor mill" info to the board.  I have had and still do have a lot of "rumor mill" info and this is the first time I have shared any of it.  I don't like "rumor mill" info unless it starts to add up to other things in the case that it might substaniate.  I pe

rsonally do not want to start rumors. 

I think perhaps when we discuss the "rumor mill" info we might want to ALWAY add "rumor mill" info.  If we don't it will get a few pages down the line and others will read it and start saying it as fact.  ugh. 

but like it said, it is the same if someone from mccleary comes to the board and posts, it's still rumor really.  whether they post it on the board or they email it to me, it is all the same, so I thought perhaps I should share the "rumor mill" info.  Now I am not so sure. 
gee sorry and hope no one gets confused. 

perhaps I should have never said anything... ugh...


I personally would like to hear the rumors from the locals.  I do agree that we should tag if from 'rumor mill', but I would like to know what the talk around the town is.  You never know when there is a thread that links, or truth involved that ties in to something else.  I understand your position though.


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3
Post by: AZSunny on July 30, 2009, 08:05:47 PM
Police chase leads on missing McCleary girl

Searchers returned to the streets of McCleary under a brutal sun Tuesday to follow up on new leads in the hunt for 11-year-old Lindsey Baum, according to The Daily World of Aberdeen.

About 25 officers and searchers with dogs braved near-record temperatures to re-canvass areas of town, Grays Harbor Undersheriff Rick Scott said.

A recent $6,000 reward for information in the missing girl’s case has produced a new wave of tips, Scott said. Surrounding law enforcement agencies including the Thurston County Sheriff’s Office and the Aberdeen Police Department sent officers to help perform follow-up searches and interviews.

About six core investigators have been leading the effort to find Lindsey, who disappeared while walking a few blocks home June 26. The detectives have found no evidence explaining the 4-foot-9, brown-haired girl’s disappearance, but they continue sorting through thousands of tips.

Officers and volunteers knocked on doors throughout town Tuesday, asking new questions and trying to reach people missed in previous interviews, Scott said.

Two teams with cadaver search dogs also roamed the town, he said, but the hot conditions limited the available scents and quickly wore out the dogs.

Scott said detectives and extra officers expect to follow up on new tips in town for at least the rest of the week. He asked anyone with any potentially helpful information to call 866-915-8299.

http://www.thenewstribune.com/partners/theolympian/story/827963.html


Why no "new" news coming from them if they are still there?  Appears to be confirmation of cadaver search dogs. 


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3
Post by: Tamikosmom on July 30, 2009, 08:26:13 PM
As of now it is rumored that she stopped at another friend's house after leaving Michaela's house, and that she was scared. And if that is true, what a shame nobody walked her home. I guess what I'm wondering is if that happened was it dark when she left the second friend's house?

If this is true ... inquiring minds want to know was this was not revealed at the getgo.  I contend it would be consider obstruction of an investigation .

Something is not right.

If investigators knew that Lindsey was not last observed by a neighbour two blocks from her home on Maple and ... she had taken another route to a friend's home ...  this info should have been publicly released immediately.

Janet

++++++

Grays Harbor Undersheriff Rick Scott  

ABC News – June 30, 2009


Scott said witnesses were able to put Lindsey within a couple of blocks of her house just after 9:30 p.m. The last person reported to have seen her, he said, was a neighbor on her way to work.

http://abcnews.go.com/US/Story?id=7966924&page=2


Grays Harbor Undersheriff Rick Scott  

The Daily World - July 2, 2009


Scott said a second person came forward Tuesday with a confirmed sighting of Baum from Friday night in the same area along Maple Street near Fifth Street.

http://**/articles/2009/07/02/local_news/doc4a4cf43c1b1dd881132403





Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3
Post by: AZSunny on July 30, 2009, 08:43:34 PM
As of now it is rumored that she stopped at another friend's house after leaving Michaela's house, and that she was scared. And if that is true, what a shame nobody walked her home. I guess what I'm wondering is if that happened was it dark when she left the second friend's house?

If this is true ... inquiring minds want to know was this was not revealed at the getgo.  I contend it would be consider obstruction of an investigation .

Something is not right.

If investigators knew that Lindsey was not last observed by a neighbour two blocks from her home on Maple and ... she had taken another route to a friend's home ...  this info should have been publicly released immediately.

Janet

++++++

Grays Harbor Undersheriff Rick Scott  

ABC News – June 30, 2009


Scott said witnesses were able to put Lindsey within a couple of blocks of her house just after 9:30 p.m. The last person reported to have seen her, he said, was a neighbor on her way to work.

http://abcnews.go.com/US/Story?id=7966924&page=2


Grays Harbor Undersheriff Rick Scott  

The Daily World - July 2, 2009


Scott said a second person came forward Tuesday with a confirmed sighting of Baum from Friday night in the same area along Maple Street near Fifth Street.

http://**/articles/2009/07/02/local_news/doc4a4cf43c1b1dd881132403





Well, as DD said, it is just a rumor.  Even possible the "other friend" lived on Maple?? 


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3
Post by: mamacrazy30 on July 30, 2009, 11:42:37 PM
so one more thing "I" am thinking here

maybe she really did start down maple, get scared and double back on 6th to get away from this car?  that would explain why the dog trailing at first ended up on 6th and stopped and it would have been the freshest scent so that would make it to where the maple trail would not count. 


be careful..i posted that before when karak was on the board and got major backlash...my line of thought as well....she was trying to go back the entire time...to a safe place, or a place she thought was safe.


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3
Post by: mamacrazy30 on July 30, 2009, 11:52:28 PM
okay..gonna' break this down...we have no info on this...le is a mess and so is the press...sorry ya'll but all we have is broken info...karaK did help for a second but then vanished....is her info correct?  can we believe what she says?  i don't know?  most think i'm a crack-pot here but thats okay with me--i know my intent and its to help find Lindsey....what do we know for a FACT...
#1:  Lindsey never came home that night....

do we Know and i mean is it a FACT that the broken down bike got to the house?


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3
Post by: doubledecker on July 31, 2009, 12:02:16 AM
so one more thing "I" am thinking here

maybe she really did start down maple, get scared and double back on 6th to get away from this car?  that would explain why the dog trailing at first ended up on 6th and stopped and it would have been the freshest scent so that would make it to where the maple trail would not count. 


be careful..i posted that before when karak was on the board and got major backlash...my line of thought as well....she was trying to go back the entire time...to a safe place, or a place she thought was safe.

personally, I have always thought she doubled back down 6th.  I have always said that.  I really think someone was after her and she knew it and she was trying to get away from them


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3
Post by: mamacrazy30 on July 31, 2009, 12:49:19 AM
so one more thing "I" am thinking here

maybe she really did start down maple, get scared and double back on 6th to get away from this car?  that would explain why the dog trailing at first ended up on 6th and stopped and it would have been the freshest scent so that would make it to where the maple trail would not count. 


be careful..i posted that before when karak was on the board and got major backlash...my line of thought as well....she was trying to go back the entire time...to a safe place, or a place she thought was safe.

personally, I have always thought she doubled back down 6th.  I have always said that.  I really think someone was after her and she knew it and she was trying to get away from them
just a thought ....
who from???  stranger/know?


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3
Post by: A_News_Junkie_Monkey on July 31, 2009, 02:30:48 AM
Madibabe - I see you up there, many have been concerned about you.   Can you give us and update?


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3
Post by: madibabe on July 31, 2009, 02:59:52 AM
lol you little monkeys can see me?  ::MonkeyHaHa:: I just popped on to read any news about little Lindsey. I have been so busy but keeping my eyes mind and ears open for any new developments or clues.
 My daughter was at camp for three days when it was suddenly closed due to a flu like symptoms outbreak. So my baby is super sick. I cant believe that in a matter of a hour timespan 60 campers were sick diarrhea vomiting including counselors. Anyway just wanted to let you know I'm still here and not going anyplace. I email dd when I'm on the road and get a idea. I cant post from my phone for some reason. It jumps around too much when quoting. Sweet Dreams Scared Monkeys See you tomorrow.


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3
Post by: JessStar on July 31, 2009, 08:09:13 AM
Perhaps the reason why so many neighbors have been seemingly uncooperative or unwilling to come forward is their own GUILT  for having turned away a scared child that was in danger who has now turned up missing.  Perhaps they could have saved her had they put their grudges aside and understood that it was an innocent 10 year old CHILD that was standing in front of them.  How shameful.  If this is the case, those people chose poorly, and now they have to live with that for the remainder of their lives.  They won't get any sympathy from me.  I'll save my tears for Lindsey.




Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3
Post by: KarmaRoundUp on July 31, 2009, 09:08:33 AM
I posted this on the maps and photos thread but wanted to bring it here also as I didn't know Lindsey was chosen for this program.

This image was taken at the Shop With A Cop(link below),a program where 100 Cops pick a child and they go to a pancake breakfast then shopping for Christmas gifts with $100.00.
Looks like Lindsey was chosen.

http://shopwithacopgraysharbor.blogspot.com/search?updated-min=2008-01-01T00%3A00%3A00-08%3A00&updated-max=2009-01-01T00%3A00%3A00-08%3A00&max-results=7



Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3
Post by: A_News_Junkie_Monkey on July 31, 2009, 10:22:26 AM
lol you little monkeys can see me?  ::MonkeyHaHa:: I just popped on to read any news about little Lindsey. I have been so busy but keeping my eyes mind and ears open for any new developments or clues.
 My daughter was at camp for three days when it was suddenly closed due to a flu like symptoms outbreak. So my baby is super sick. I cant believe that in a matter of a hour timespan 60 campers were sick diarrhea vomiting including counselors. Anyway just wanted to let you know I'm still here and not going anyplace. I email dd when I'm on the road and get a idea. I cant post from my phone for some reason. It jumps around too much when quoting. Sweet Dreams Scared Monkeys See you tomorrow.

Good to hear from you, but take care of your baby - hope she feels better real soon.   


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3
Post by: no rose colored glasses on July 31, 2009, 10:30:49 AM
lol you little monkeys can see me?  ::MonkeyHaHa:: I just popped on to read any news about little Lindsey. I have been so busy but keeping my eyes mind and ears open for any new developments or clues.
 My daughter was at camp for three days when it was suddenly closed due to a flu like symptoms outbreak. So my baby is super sick. I cant believe that in a matter of a hour timespan 60 campers were sick diarrhea vomiting including counselors. Anyway just wanted to let you know I'm still here and not going anyplace. I email dd when I'm on the road and get a idea. I cant post from my phone for some reason. It jumps around too much when quoting. Sweet Dreams Scared Monkeys See you tomorrow.

Good to hear from you, but take care of your baby - hope she feels better real soon.   
I hope she feels better soon also, what a terrible experience for the kids at camp.


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3
Post by: rebelgirl901 on July 31, 2009, 11:19:48 AM
I'm back.   when I posted the "local rumor mill" info I was very careful to be sure to say "LOCAL RUMOR MILL" .  I think if someone came on the board to read and came in the middle of this they would start thinking this "IS" (fact) what happened.  I really try not to bring any "rumor mill" info to the board.  I have had and still do have a lot of "rumor mill" info and this is the first time I have shared any of it.  I don't like "rumor mill" info unless it starts to add up to other things in the case that it might substaniate.  I pe

rsonally do not want to start rumors. 

I think perhaps when we discuss the "rumor mill" info we might want to ALWAY add "rumor mill" info.  If we don't it will get a few pages down the line and others will read it and start saying it as fact.  ugh. 

but like it said, it is the same if someone from mccleary comes to the board and posts, it's still rumor really.  whether they post it on the board or they email it to me, it is all the same, so I thought perhaps I should share the "rumor mill" info.  Now I am not so sure. 
gee sorry and hope no one gets confused. 

perhaps I should have never said anything... ugh...



No that's okay d.d. I know it's rumor, so don't feel bad about posting what you hear, or receive regarding Lindsey.  Although rumor, there could be some hint of the truth in what you are hearing.  Like a lot of have been saying, somebody knows something.  As someone else posted, the reason why they haven't cooprated with l.e. is because they do feel guilty they didn't help Lindsey when they had the chance.  Regardless of how you feel about a family, when it comes to a child, you should never turn your back on them.  I don't understand.  But please don't stop posting any info you have (that you can post).   

Thanks for all your hard work, you have done some amazing research and I truly appreciate your efforts and your contributions to helping find Lindsey.


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3
Post by: Tamikosmom on July 31, 2009, 11:40:51 AM
Perhaps the reason why so many neighbors have been seemingly uncooperative or unwilling to come forward is their own GUILT  for having turned away a scared child that was in danger who has now turned up missing.  Perhaps they could have saved her had they put their grudges aside and understood that it was an innocent 10 year old CHILD that was standing in front of them.  How shameful.  If this is the case, those people chose poorly, and now they have to live with that for the remainder of their lives.  They won't get any sympathy from me.  I'll save my tears for Lindsey.




JessStar

Is there credible backup that reveals that residents of McCleary turned away a "scared" Lindsey who was in danger.

In my world ... that would never happen.  My neighbours, friends and family would embrace any child who had a need.

I suspect that many McCleary residents are aware of the underlying dynamics encompassing the Baum household and believe that Lindsey made it home within minutes of being observed by the neighbour who was on her way to work.

In the process of elimination ... I hope that the concerns of McCleary residents in regards to Lindsey's brother were not not disregarded by Undersheriff Rick Scott.  I hope the concerns of Mccleary residents were taken seriously and ... Josh Baum was not ruled out as a person of interest without investigation ... without questioning and ... without searching.

Janet

++++++++

Grays Harbor Undersheriff Rick Scott

The Olympian - June 30, 2009

Lindsey left her cell phone at home before leaving to play with friends Friday, said Grays Harbor Undersheriff Rick Scott. Lindsey’s older brother had left the Maple Street residence before his sister after the two had a dispute over the bike Lindsey had borrowed from him that day – a common occurrence between frequently squabbling siblings, Scott added.

http://www.theolympian.com/southsound/story/896613.html


Residents of McCleary Speak Out

mlachester 1 day ago wrote:


... Its no big secret she had came to my house to call 911 when her brother had done things to her.

http://www.king5.com/topstories/stories/NW_063009WAB-Mccleary-girl-search-LJ.1fc0b759.html?ocp=2#slcgm_comments_anchor


mlachester 2 hours ago wrote:

I am close to her and I know a lot more than the media or law enforcement are saying right now. … Sorry if you don't like the truth but I have never been one to keep the truth in and she should of been taken the first time she called 911 from my house asking for help instead of put in a police car and taken back to her abuser!"

http://www.king5.com/topstories/stor...omments_anchor


mamahead 13 hours ago wrote:
 
Lindsey has been afraid of her brother for a very long time.  He has threatned her many times. Where is she? And why is the mother not crazy with sadness or emotion. Show us some tears. The friend that Lindsey was last with shows more emotion than the mother. And why was the brother begging for money for fireworks at his little sisters candlelight vigil?

http://www.king5.com/topstories/stories/NW_070609WAB-missing-mccleary-girl-SW.14c01624.html


Lindsey Baum

Lindsey Baum:  Facebook Entry

TWILIGHT FREAK is happy that her brother is going to juvi tomorrow.Mood: happ at 14:10 17 Jun view more

Lindsey Baum is happy that her brother is going to juvie tomorrow.
Mood: Happ at 14:10 17 June

http://www.myspace.com/477760045


Melissa Baum

KING 5 News – July 2, 2009


If a stranger kidnapped 10-year-old Lindsey Baum, her mother says the girl would have put up a fight

“She has very long fingernails,” said Melissa Baum. “Her brother is proof enough of that.”

http://www.king5.com/topstories/stories/NW_070209WAB-mccleary-KS.67b0a9.html




Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3
Post by: Edward on July 31, 2009, 11:57:25 AM
I have been looking for some true statistics relative to stranger abductions but have not been able to find anything more then supposed professional opinions.. I do not trust most professionals.. There opinions make for good toilet paper most of the time.

When I look at news reports..
  I find that most all of children abducted by strangers, that the child is found murdered or not found at all most of the time.
  In news reports "which may only show a small percentage of cases" I find very few children found alive and happy.
So based on that I would consider 90 percent of stranger abductions that the victim is murdered..
Stranger abductions is a small percentage of abductions as parental abductions appear to be the most common in occurrence.


Anyone who can find true statistics by a government agency who tacks every incident please post a link as I would really like to read it for my own education.
Thank You.


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3
Post by: AZSunny on July 31, 2009, 12:04:43 PM
This post from Lindsey's Myspace account haunts me.  What was causing these feelings? 

TWILIGHT FREAKi've been getting a lot of nightmares latley and i have this bad feeling that something bads gonna happenat 6:48 AM May 29 Mood:scared 


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3
Post by: Edward on July 31, 2009, 12:07:05 PM
That was very insightful on her part..


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3
Post by: Tamikosmom on July 31, 2009, 12:14:06 PM
AZSunny


 ::MonkeyAngel::

Love, Janet

+++++

AZSunny
Re: Lindsey Baum #2
« Reply #634 on: July 20, 2009, 02:08:05 AM »


Janet,  dreading the 1st of August.  That is the day I lost my husband.  I am trying so hard to focus on other things, but it is like an elephant standing in front of me.  I miss him so much it physically hurts.

http://scaredmonkeys.net/index.php?topic=5627.msg882622#msg882622


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3
Post by: sherip on July 31, 2009, 12:14:39 PM
I posted this on the maps and photos thread but wanted to bring it here also as I didn't know Lindsey was chosen for this program.

This image was taken at the Shop With A Cop(link below),a program where 100 Cops pick a child and they go to a pancake breakfast then shopping for Christmas gifts with $100.00.
Looks like Lindsey was chosen.

http://shopwithacopgraysharbor.blogspot.com/search?updated-min=2008-01-01T00%3A00%3A00-08%3A00&updated-max=2009-01-01T00%3A00%3A00-08%3A00&max-results=7



So much has been speculated about LE and possibly one of them being involved - does anyone know WHO the police officer was that took Lindsey to "shop with a cop"

She would know and trust that person.


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3
Post by: Edward on July 31, 2009, 12:28:51 PM
Tamikosmom ..I am so sorry to her that.. God Bless you, may he give you some peace knowing that you loved your husband so much..


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3
Post by: MunkeyMunk on July 31, 2009, 12:33:02 PM
AZSunny


 ::MonkeyAngel::

Love, Janet

+++++

AZSunny
Re: Lindsey Baum #2
« Reply #634 on: July 20, 2009, 02:08:05 AM »


Janet,  dreading the 1st of August.  That is the day I lost my husband.  I am trying so hard to focus on other things, but it is like an elephant standing in front of me.  I miss him so much it physically hurts.

http://scaredmonkeys.net/index.php?topic=5627.msg882622#msg882622




BIG HUG for you AZSUNNY!!!  ::MonkeyAngel:: I feel for you my grandpa passed away Dec 30, 2008 we moved grandma into our house they were married 72 yrs. she cries everyday!!! ::MonkeyAngel::

May some cheery news of someone being found safe come this weekend!! ::MonkeyDance::
Prayers for Lindsey & her family


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3
Post by: Tamikosmom on July 31, 2009, 12:34:13 PM
Tamikosmom ..I am so sorry to her that.. God Bless you, may he give you some peace knowing that you loved your husband so much..

Edward

AZSunny lost her hubby one year ago.  She is hurting terribly.  My heart breaks for her.

Janet


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3
Post by: Lovinlife on July 31, 2009, 12:38:04 PM
White van reference- Credit to Edward


::MonkeyEek:: ::MonkeyEek:: ::MonkeyEek:: ::MonkeyEek::

Man Tries To Lure Young Girl Into Van


Orcutt, CA-- Residents are being told to keep a lookout for a man driving a white van with possibly Washington State license plates.

Santa Barbara Sheriff deputies received a report Monday afternoon, that a man driving a white van near Hartnett and Cane tried to lure an 11-year-old girl into his van.

The girl said, the man pulled up to her and asked her to help him find a lost dog. The girl told sheriff officials that when she ran to a nearby home to call for help.

Detectives say the suspect is in his 50's and was driving a white cargo van with two rear windows covered by curtains.

If you have any information on a possible suspect, you are urged to call the Santa Barbara Sheriff's Department.

http://www.keyt.com/news/local/51341337.html


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3
Post by: AZSunny on July 31, 2009, 12:38:42 PM
AZSunny


 ::MonkeyAngel::

Love, Janet

+++++

AZSunny
Re: Lindsey Baum #2
« Reply #634 on: July 20, 2009, 02:08:05 AM »


Janet,  dreading the 1st of August.  That is the day I lost my husband.  I am trying so hard to focus on other things, but it is like an elephant standing in front of me.  I miss him so much it physically hurts.

http://scaredmonkeys.net/index.php?topic=5627.msg882622#msg882622


Thanks Janet for thinking of me.   I hope with this day passing it will give me some healing.  It has been a long road.   

Hugs...


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3
Post by: Edward on July 31, 2009, 12:48:30 PM
Tamikosmom ..I am so sorry to her that.. God Bless you, may he give you some peace knowing that you loved your husband so much..

Edward

AZSunny lost her hubby one year ago.  She is hurting terribly.  My heart breaks for her.

Janet



I am so sorry to hear that I Pray God gives her some peace in her mind..
Life on earth is a temporary state of mind and true love lives forever.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=a5hRchodc2s&feature=related


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3
Post by: Northern Rose on July 31, 2009, 12:50:18 PM
I have been looking for some true statistics relative to stranger abductions but have not been able to find anything more then supposed professional opinions.. I do not trust most professionals.. There opinions make for good toilet paper most of the time.

When I look at news reports..
  I find that most all of children abducted by strangers, that the child is found murdered or not found at all most of the time.
  In news reports "which may only show a small percentage of cases" I find very few children found alive and happy.
So based on that I would consider 90 percent of stranger abductions that the victim is murdered..
Stranger abductions is a small percentage of abductions as parental abductions appear to be the most common in occurrence.


Anyone who can find true statistics by a government agency who tacks every incident please post a link as I would really like to read it for my own education.
Thank You.

Here are some 2002 stats from the DOJ.  Still looking for newer ones for you.

http://www.ncjrs.gov/pdffiles1/ojjdp/196467.pdf


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3
Post by: no rose colored glasses on July 31, 2009, 12:52:44 PM
AZSunny


 ::MonkeyAngel::

Love, Janet

+++++

AZSunny
Re: Lindsey Baum #2
« Reply #634 on: July 20, 2009, 02:08:05 AM »


Janet,  dreading the 1st of August.  That is the day I lost my husband.  I am trying so hard to focus on other things, but it is like an elephant standing in front of me.  I miss him so much it physically hurts.

http://scaredmonkeys.net/index.php?topic=5627.msg882622#msg882622

AZSunny, my thoughts and prayers are with you  ::MonkeyAngel::


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3
Post by: Northern Rose on July 31, 2009, 12:55:28 PM
I have been looking for some true statistics relative to stranger abductions but have not been able to find anything more then supposed professional opinions.. I do not trust most professionals.. There opinions make for good toilet paper most of the time.

When I look at news reports..
  I find that most all of children abducted by strangers, that the child is found murdered or not found at all most of the time.
  In news reports "which may only show a small percentage of cases" I find very few children found alive and happy.
So based on that I would consider 90 percent of stranger abductions that the victim is murdered..
Stranger abductions is a small percentage of abductions as parental abductions appear to be the most common in occurrence.


Anyone who can find true statistics by a government agency who tacks every incident please post a link as I would really like to read it for my own education.
Thank You.

Here are some 2002 stats from the DOJ.  Still looking for newer ones for you.

http://www.ncjrs.gov/pdffiles1/ojjdp/196467.pdf

http://www.usdoj.gov/oig/reports/FBI/a0908/chapter4.htm


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3
Post by: JessStar on July 31, 2009, 12:59:11 PM
I have been looking for some true statistics relative to stranger abductions but have not been able to find anything more then supposed professional opinions.. I do not trust most professionals.. There opinions make for good toilet paper most of the time.

When I look at news reports..
  I find that most all of children abducted by strangers, that the child is found murdered or not found at all most of the time.
  In news reports "which may only show a small percentage of cases" I find very few children found alive and happy.
So based on that I would consider 90 percent of stranger abductions that the victim is murdered..
Stranger abductions is a small percentage of abductions as parental abductions appear to be the most common in occurrence.


Anyone who can find true statistics by a government agency who tacks every incident please post a link as I would really like to read it for my own education.
Thank You.

I can probably help you with this, Edward.  But keep in mind that most cases aren't reported in the media.  Those that receive media attention are sensational for one reason or another.  So I'd be a very leary about using media reports as a basis for a statistical analysis. 

While I look up the information, consider this.  There are about 800,000 children in the United States that are reported missing each year.  Let's assume a very small percentage of those are stranger abductions--1%.  I think the number is more like 9%, but we'll use a very small percentage for purposes of this hypothetical.  1% translates to 8,000 children.  According to the United States Department of Justice and the National Center for Missing & Exploited Children, between 100 and 115 children are abducted and murdered each year.  That means that out of the total population of missing children, .000125, or .0125%, are abducted and murdered.  Using this analysis, it would not be accurate to conclude that 90% of children abducted by strangers result in death to the child.  If that were the case, we'd be seeing thousands of children being abducted and murdered each year--a figure that would translate to more than 22 children a day.  And while the abduction and murder of ONE child is too many, fortunately we are not seeing this happening to 22 children a day.


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3
Post by: Edward on July 31, 2009, 01:14:48 PM
Thank You both for that information.


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3
Post by: AZSunny on July 31, 2009, 01:15:04 PM
Tamikosmom ..I am so sorry to her that.. God Bless you, may he give you some peace knowing that you loved your husband so much..

Edward

AZSunny lost her hubby one year ago.  She is hurting terribly.  My heart breaks for her.

Janet



I am so sorry to hear that I Pray God gives her some peace in her mind..
Life on earth is a temporary state of mind and true love lives forever.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=a5hRchodc2s&feature=related


Edward thank you, that is a beautiful and meaningful song.   It touched my heart.


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3
Post by: Tamikosmom on July 31, 2009, 01:33:44 PM
AZSunny

The deep pain you must be experiencing today on the anniversary of the loss of you "soul" mate has brought me to my knees ... has brought me to a place where I realize that it is so important that I reassess my priorities in life.  I have a hubby that ... despite the normal ups and downs ... has blessed my life for 43 years.  He is my rock.  Yet ... for the most part ... I take this gift ... that should be treasured ... for granted.  It is so wrong.

Janet


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3
Post by: AZSunny on July 31, 2009, 01:56:10 PM
AZSunny

The deep pain you must be experiencing today on the anniversary of the loss of you "soul" mate has brought me to my knees ... has brought me to a place where I realize that it is so important that I reassess my priorities in life.  I have a hubby that ... despite the normal ups and downs ... has blessed my life for 43 years.  He is my rock.  Yet ... for the most part ... I take this gift ... that should be treasured ... for granted.  It is so wrong.

Janet


You are so right Janet, treasure every moment and store it in your memory.  It all can change in a hearbeat, and life is never the same.


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3
Post by: Tamikosmom on July 31, 2009, 02:03:41 PM
I feel for Josh Baum.  Many anger issues that follow children into adulthood are rooted in experiences akin to those that KaraK describes.

Nevertheless ... a little ten year girl is missing and ... all avenues in the course of the investigation must be persued.  Justice for Lindsey Baum dictates that no free passes are hand out based on circumstances.  Accountability is where it is at.

Janet

++++++


KaraK
Re: Lindsey Baum, 10y missing from McCleary, WA 6/26/09
« Reply #1809 on: July 09, 2009, 04:33:45 AM »


Josh had gotten into so many spats that honestly were in a large part things he did not start but because he was the oldest he was the one who got in trouble. I've set down kids I've never met before to have a talk with them because I heard that they were antagonizing him to see if he'd blow up.

http://scaredmonkeys.net/index.php?topic=5541.msg871164;topicseen#msg871164

Kara Kampen – Mother of Lindsey’s friend Michaela.


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3
Post by: A_News_Junkie_Monkey on July 31, 2009, 02:32:25 PM
AZSunny - I hope it is alright, I asked for prayers for you in these difficult times in the prayer thread.  Here is a link - http://scaredmonkeys.net/index.php?topic=21.new#new
HUGS and  ::MonkeyAngel:: monkey kisses! 


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3
Post by: JessStar on July 31, 2009, 02:55:50 PM
In 2002, the United States Department of Justice commissioned a study through NISMART (National Incidence Studies of Missing, Abducted, Runaway and Throwaway Children" called "Nonfamily Abducted Children: National Estimates and Characteristics."  I will post a copy of the actual study for anyone who wants it.  The study used the most comprehensive information available.  Importantly, it analyzed those abductions perpetarated by a stranger or slight acquaintance who transported the child 50 or more miles, detained the child overnight, held the child for ransom or with the intent to keep the child permanently, or killed the child (referred to in the study as a "Stereotypical Kidnapping).  One of the study's key findings was that in 40 percent of Stereotypical Kidnappings, the child was killed and, in another 4 percent, the child was not returned or located.  This child was returned physically injured in 32% of the cases, and returned alive in 57% of the cases.  The child was sexually assaulted 49 percent of the time.  Other motives included robbery or ransom.  During the study term, there were 115 such abductions.  46 of those children were murdered while 66 were returned alive.  The remainder were not returned or located.  More than one perpetrator was involved in a starting 48 percent of the cases.  86% of the perpetrators were male, while 7% were female.  (the remainder had no information).  The perpetrator is 20-29 years old in 36% of the cases; 13-19 years old in 21% of the cases, and 30-39 in 21% of the cases.  In 40% of the cases, the child was taken from the street, car or some other vehicle.  In 16% of the cases, the child was taken from his or her own home or yard.  The child was moved 50 miles or more in only 14% of the cases.  Most "stereotypical kidnapped" children are recovered within 24 hours (83%), with 10% lasting longer than 24 hours.

During the same time period, there were 58,200 "non-family" abductions that were not "sterotypical kidnappings."  Out of those, 99 percent were returned alive.

The study carried with it a 95% confidence interval.  What that means is that if the study was repeated 100 times, 95 of the replications would produce the same general results.



Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3
Post by: JessStar on July 31, 2009, 02:59:13 PM
AZ Sunny, my thoughts and prayers are with you.  Losing a loved one is always difficult.  Losing a soul mate is always tremendously difficult.  May God and Peace be With You.



Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3
Post by: JessStar on July 31, 2009, 03:01:43 PM
In 2002, the United States Department of Justice commissioned a study through NISMART (National Incidence Studies of Missing, Abducted, Runaway and Throwaway Children" called "Nonfamily Abducted Children: National Estimates and Characteristics."  I will post a copy of the actual study for anyone who wants it.  The study used the most comprehensive information available.  Importantly, it analyzed those abductions perpetarated by a stranger or slight acquaintance who transported the child 50 or more miles, detained the child overnight, held the child for ransom or with the intent to keep the child permanently, or killed the child (referred to in the study as a "Stereotypical Kidnapping).  One of the study's key findings was that in 40 percent of Stereotypical Kidnappings, the child was killed and, in another 4 percent, the child was not returned or located.  This child was returned physically injured in 32% of the cases, and returned alive in 57% of the cases.  The child was sexually assaulted 49 percent of the time.  Other motives included robbery or ransom.  During the study term, there were 115 such abductions.  46 of those children were murdered while 66 were returned alive.  The remainder were not returned or located.  More than one perpetrator was involved in a starting 48 percent of the cases.  86% of the perpetrators were male, while 7% were female.  (the remainder had no information).  The perpetrator is 20-29 years old in 36% of the cases; 13-19 years old in 21% of the cases, and 30-39 in 21% of the cases.  In 40% of the cases, the child was taken from the street, car or some other vehicle.  In 16% of the cases, the child was taken from his or her own home or yard.  The child was moved 50 miles or more in only 14% of the cases.  Most "stereotypical kidnapped" children are recovered within 24 hours (83%), with 10% lasting longer than 24 hours.

During the same time period, there were 58,200 "non-family" abductions that were not "sterotypical kidnappings."  Out of those, 99 percent were returned alive.

The study carried with it a 95% confidence interval.  What that means is that if the study was repeated 100 times, 95 of the replications would produce the same general results.



The Study can be found here:

http://www.missingkids.com/en_US/documents/nismart2_nonfamily.pdf


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3
Post by: Edward on July 31, 2009, 03:39:51 PM
I copy and pasted it ..Thank You very much for the research study and a good statistic I can use in the future.


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3
Post by: JessStar on July 31, 2009, 03:57:20 PM
I copy and pasted it ..Thank You very much for the research study and a good statistic I can use in the future.

No problem, Edward.  I find it emotionally trying to read those studies.  They always seem to be accompanied by an undertone that the "problem is not as bad as everyone thinks."  But to me, one murdered child is one too many.  If it were up to me, I'd be spending the One Billion Dollars on finding and saving missing children, not on Cash for Clunkers.  But to our Government, the problem of missing and exploited kids only deserves a $40 million a year allotment.  And I'm not kidding about that figure.  I don't joke about things like that--it makes me way way way too angry.





Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3
Post by: Tamikosmom on July 31, 2009, 04:34:21 PM
AZSunny

I miss ya on the Natalee Holloway forum.  I miss ya whether you are silently sitting in the rafter or you are contributing with your posts to the elusive cause of justice for this 18 year old American citizen or ... a measure of closure for her family.

 ::MonkeyWaa::

Janet


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3
Post by: KarmaRoundUp on July 31, 2009, 05:12:06 PM
Lindsey Baum Reward Increase



The Daily World

The reward for information leading to 11-year-old Lindsey Baum has been raised to $10,000 as investigators continue checking on new leads.

Lindsey’s mother Melissa Baum said donations have increased the reward previously offered by Crime Stoppers and the National Center for Missing and Exploited Children.

Grays Harbor Undersheriff Rick Scott said a team of investigators continue to catalog and check out new tips from when the reward was first offered. They are conducting follow-up interviews with the help of neighboring law enforcement agencies.

Lindsey disappeared on June 26 while walking a few blocks to her home in McCleary. Investigators have found no evidence explaining the 4-foot-9, brown-haired girl’s disappearance in the past month.

Melissa Baum said people can contribute to the Lindsey Baum Reward Fund at any Sterling Savings bank branch.

Anyone with information on Lindsey’s whereabouts or suspicious behavior that may be related to the case should call the tip line at 1-866-915-8299 or send an e-mail to soadmin@co.grays-harbor.wa.us.
 
http://**/articles/2009/07/31/local_news/doc4a733060c75f2234916382.txt


 



Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3
Post by: doubledecker on July 31, 2009, 05:34:16 PM
I am very glad to see the reward going up for Lindsey.  Hopefully, more people are telling something and they are following up on what the people are saying.


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3
Post by: doubledecker on July 31, 2009, 05:36:29 PM
does anyone have any idea what it costs to hire a sketch artist?  a good one? 


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3
Post by: Edward on July 31, 2009, 05:58:57 PM
I copy and pasted it ..Thank You very much for the research study and a good statistic I can use in the future.

No problem, Edward.  I find it emotionally trying to read those studies.  They always seem to be accompanied by an undertone that the "problem is not as bad as everyone thinks."  But to me, one murdered child is one too many.  If it were up to me, I'd be spending the One Billion Dollars on finding and saving missing children, not on Cash for Clunkers.  But to our Government, the problem of missing and exploited kids only deserves a $40 million a year allotment.  And I'm not kidding about that figure.  I don't joke about things like that--it makes me way way way too angry.





I know how you feel.. 4 years ago when we I got involved with the search for Natalee Holloway, I had only done searches physical searches for missing people before that and never done research on missing people nor seen the levels of bureaucracy ..
 Now more then 4 years later I am so frustrated with the professionals that I want the United States Government to appoint a citizen group with unlimited jurisdiction worldwide to do the research and the physical searches for missing people as we can't seem to trust THEM "So many agencies caught up in bureaucratic bull-crap and EGO, that I can't name them all" to do it properly.. I am so frustrated with the amount of unsolved cases on American soil.. We made better progress in a nation not our own with no rights to do so.. and we never let go of the suspects on that rock called Aruba and they are in fact the guilty party..
From the beginning of Amber alerts LE for the most part fails inside of the United States.. There is no common sense in any socialistic group.. You need common sense and the ability to act quickly in ALL of these cases to have any chance of catching the bad people early on.. Until the professionals start acting with urgency on ALL of these cases I am always going to be frustrated. Although it does not happen in all cases and if the criminal falls inside of the police station and confesses or LE finds the victim in the middle of the road they do solve cases and they never let us hear the end of it when that does happen.. True


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3
Post by: Tamikosmom on July 31, 2009, 06:05:30 PM
Think about it.  Considering the girls left the video store at 8:19 PM and ... then  went to the Baum residence prior to beginning their jouney to the Kampen residence with Josh ... there could only be about a 30 minute time span between the girls' parting with Josh following the argument and ... Lindsey's expected time home after leaving the Kampen residence.

Inquiring minds want to know what time did Josh Baum arrive home that evening.

In the process of elimination ... all avenues ... even difficult avenues ... must be explored.

Janet

++++++


KaraK
Re: Lindsey Baum, 10y missing from McCleary, WA 6/26/09
« Reply #1936 on: July 10, 2009, 07:07:48 PM »


The conversation was apparently quite short and consisted of little more then a "Josh you need to go home" Josh trying to explain what was going on and the girls asking the lady to tell Josh to go home again.
 
http://scaredmonkeys.net/index.php?topic=5541.msg873229#msg873229


The Daily World - July 3, 2009

Kampen said she has replayed that Friday evening in her head over and over. So has her daughter, Michaela, 10, who spent the day swimming with Lindsey. They walked together with Josh Baum, 13, to the Kampen house. But halfway there, Michaela said they teased Josh, getting under his skin ...

http://scaredmonkeys.net/index.php?topic=5541.msg863022


KaraK
Re: Lindsey Baum, 10y missing from McCleary, WA 6/26/09
« Reply #1809 on: July 09, 2009, 04:33:45 AM
»

Josh had gotten into so many spats that honestly were in a large part things he did not start but because he was the oldest he was the one who got in trouble. I've set down kids I've never met before to have a talk with them because I heard that they were antagonizing him to see if he'd blow up.

http://scaredmonkeys.net/index.php?topic=5541.msg871164;topicseen#msg871164


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3
Post by: no rose colored glasses on July 31, 2009, 06:19:08 PM
I would like to know what time Josh got home that evening as well. But since his own mother says he is a wanderer, she probably doesn't even know.


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3
Post by: Tamikosmom on July 31, 2009, 06:40:53 PM
I would like to know what time Josh got home that evening as well. But since his own mother says he is a wanderer, she probably doesn't even know.

I do not know if it was fear of the consequences or love for my parents that was the motivating factor but ... at 12 years of age if an adult were to instruct my brothers or I to go home ... we would be home licity split.

Janet


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3
Post by: no rose colored glasses on July 31, 2009, 06:54:19 PM
I would like to know what time Josh got home that evening as well. But since his own mother says he is a wanderer, she probably doesn't even know.

I do not know if it was fear of the consequences or love for my parents that was the motivating factor but ... at 12 years of age if an adult were to instruct my brothers or I to go home ... we would be home licity split.

Janet
Yes, I know I would have also, but then kids were not allowed to be disrespectful to their elders, not like some kids are today.


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3
Post by: doubledecker on July 31, 2009, 06:58:02 PM
okay I am going to try to understand this whole josh thing. 

did they police question him?  if so, do you think he could lie well enough all this time he would not convict himself if he were guilty? 

where would he hide a body or keep a person tied up/locked up or whatever?  out in the woods? in some old building?  etc. 

do you think the police just ignored him and never asked him anything? 

if he and lindsey were fighting and the lady on the street noticed and made josh go home, or at least told him to go home, then wouldn't someone else here them fighting again if they were fighting when lindsey was walking back home. 

did josh wait for lindsey along the way and they fought and he did something to her?  where would he have dragged her to? 

did she get home and he did something to her there?  again, would his mother hear them fighting? where would he drag her off to?  the dogs were at the house and searching the area around there, so wouldn't they have found her if josh did something to her at home and then dragged her out of the house to the woods around there? 

I am trying to understand how others think josh did this, hid her body, and no one finds her? the dogs have been all over town.  wouldn't they have found her scent?  if you think the weather messed up the scent, then okay, where is she?  in some house? under a house?  etc.  its been over a month, if there is a decomposing body in this heat in town, someone would know it by now.  how far could josh drag her out in the woods?  a mile?  1000 feet?  I would think they have searched at least 1000 feet all the way around the town?  I would hope they did.  did he sink her in water?  how would he weight her down? 

do you think he killed her then called someone to help him dispose of her? 

I am just trying to understand how you think josh is responsible and no one has figured that out by now.  I'm not saying he isn't able to do this, I do believe 12 year old kids can do this, but I would think if he did, they would know it by now or at least found her. 

do you think his mother helped him cover this up?  she had no car?  did she help him drag her off somewhere?  did they call someone else with a car to take her and get rid of her?  who would do that?  trust a kid not to tell it if he got caught? 

I have no problem trying to help figure out how josh could have done this etc, but I must not be looking at it the same way some others are


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3
Post by: sunshine12 on July 31, 2009, 07:15:10 PM
DD-excellent post.  i think that obviously there are some concerns with jb... but i agree with you that i can't seem to come up with any plausible scenario in which he could have been responsible for lb's disappearance.

the only thing i can think of that could be possible (yet extremely far fetched) is if he dug a deep hole in the woods somewhere and had this planned out, which i find almost impossible.

if he was involved, i dont see how he did this alone. if it was a plot w/friends i dont see how someone hasn't talked yet, or how the rumor mill hasnt started on that.

i originally thought maybe an older teen was responsible for this, but the more time that has passed, and the more i have read on the research everyone has been doing on people, the more i think this was an adult aquantince.


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3
Post by: Tamikosmom on July 31, 2009, 07:33:06 PM
DD

When all the underlying dynamic that has been revealed/alleged encompassing Josh Baum and ... then when you consider the argument that must of been so heated that it dictated  intervention by a neighbour ... logic dictates that Lindsey's brother should not be overlooked as a person of interest.  Hey ... maybe he has not been overlooked but ... the dots cannot be connected.  Think about the six searches conducted at the creek within days following Lindsey's disappearance.  Think about the recent search with the dogs.

I can only speculate on a possible scenerio and ... it involve a chance meeting between  Lindsey and a still angry Josh within two block from their home ... a chance meeting following Lindsey being observed at Fifteen and Maple by a neighbor driving to work.  Then somewhere off the beaten track ... things go out of hand. 

Consideing Melissa Baum passed a lie detector test ... I do not believe she has any first hand knowledge of wrongdoing.

I saw a photo of Josh Baum at the second vigil a few nights ago.  He is a good size.

Again ... I am not accusing but ... when what is known about Josh and Lindsey's relationship that appears to reach beyond normal sibling rivalry ... I believe that her brother should not be overlooked as a person of interest.

Janet




Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3
Post by: doubledecker on July 31, 2009, 07:34:57 PM
DD-excellent post.  i think that obviously there are some concerns with jb... but i agree with you that i can't seem to come up with any plausible scenario in which he could have been responsible for lb's disappearance.

the only thing i can think of that could be possible (yet extremely far fetched) is if he dug a deep hole in the woods somewhere and had this planned out, which i find almost impossible.

if he was involved, i dont see how he did this alone. if it was a plot w/friends i dont see how someone hasn't talked yet, or how the rumor mill hasnt started on that.

i originally thought maybe an older teen was responsible for this, but the more time that has passed, and the more i have read on the research everyone has been doing on people, the more i think this was an adult aquantince.

I'm more than willing to listen to the reasons and HOW he could have done this and they not find her, but I just can't figure out myself how come they have not found her if josh did this.  I can't figure out where he would have put her that they can't find her.  I know people can do things together and stay quiet. I am a firm believer in mulitple perps doing stuff together and no one every telling.  but who would have helped Josh.  that is the question.  I can't see how he could hide her by himself.

even if he had a place to hide her, he had to get her there.  if he dragged her on the ground the dogs would know.  if he got her in an empty house or building in town, wouldn't someone know it by now?  in this heat? 

does he have an older friend who drives who would help him?  who would that be.  does he know anyone THAT well who would do that?  where is the "friend" if there is one?  has he been known to hang out with anyone who is that good of friend of his? 

I just don't have any answers to help me with this.


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3
Post by: Tamikosmom on July 31, 2009, 07:38:37 PM
Again ... it would be interesting to know what time Josh Baum got home on the evening of June 26, 2009.  Did he go home as the neighbour who intervened in the argument had instructed?  If he was at home with Mom prior to Lindsey's leaving the Kampen resident between 9:15 PM and 9:30 PM then this wannabe detective's speculation will go in another direction.

Janet


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3
Post by: doubledecker on July 31, 2009, 07:42:39 PM
DD

When all the underlying dynamic that has been revealed/alleged encompassing Josh Baum and ... then when you consider the argument that must of been so heated that it dictated  intervention by a neighbour ... logic dictates that Lindsey's brother should not be overlooked as a person of interest.  Hey ... maybe he has not been overlooked but ... the dots cannot be connected.  Think about the six searches conducted at the creek within days following Lindsey's disappearance.  Think about the recent search with the dogs.

I can only speculate on a possible scenerio and ... it involve a chance meeting between  Lindsey and a still angry Josh within two block from their home ... a chance meeting following Lindsey being observed at Fifteen and Maple by a neighbor driving to work.  Then somewhere off the beaten track ... things go out of hand. 

Consideing Melissa Baum passed a lie detector test ... I do not believe she has any first hand knowledge of wrongdoing.

I saw a photo of Josh Baum at the second vigil a few nights ago.  He is a good size.

Again ... I am not accusing but ... when what is known about Josh and Lindsey's relationship that appears to reach beyond normal sibling rivalry ... I believe that her brother should not be overlooked as a person of interest.

Janet




oh I agree with you that he should not be overlooked at all.  and I believe he is big enough to do something to her either on purpose or accidently if they got into a physical altercation.  I have no problem believing any of those things.  My problem is where would he hide her?  how?  if he hid her someone where he could get her on foot, and if he really is responsible and did this, then she is close... and if she is that close, and he dragged her off somewhere, then they must not have looked very well AT ALL.  that is my problem with this theory... they can't find her where I think he would be able to put her.  either he would have to have help to get her out of there, or they didn't search that town at all.  "IF" he were to have done this. 

It's not even that I don't agree with you that he could have done this, he "could" have, but what did he do with her?  see what I mean?  do you have some ideas where he could have put her or gotten her there?  that is what I can't get past.  believe me, if I could make sense out of where he could have put her, I would be ragging about him just like everyone else.  well maybe not quite as bad, but I would certainly be over here by myself with some huge file of my own going through it. 

if you can tell me something where it seems believeable to me, or even half A$$ believeable to me where he could have hid her, I am more than ready to add him to my list.  the ONLY reason I personally can see that he did it and she is wherever he could have put her, is the police and search dogs are not looking at all.  because if josh dragged her somewhere they should have found her.


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3
Post by: doubledecker on July 31, 2009, 07:51:01 PM
Again ... it would be interesting to know what time Josh Baum got home on the evening of June 26, 2009.  Did he go home as the neighbour who intervened in the argument had instructed?  If he was at home with Mom prior to Lindsey's leaving the Kampen resident between 9:15 PM and 9:30 PM then this wannabe detective's speculation will go in another direction.

Janet


I would think the police would certainly ask josh when he got home, if for no other reason to see where he was and if he saw anyone out and about wherever he was at at the time she was walking home.  even if they never even consider he might be responsible, he was with her right before that and known to be out walking around or at least home so they should have asked him where he was and did he see anyone weird around etc. 

if they never talked to him at all, then boy would that be something


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3
Post by: klaasend on July 31, 2009, 07:51:27 PM
DON'T MISS DANA PRETZER TONIGHT AT 9PM ET:

(http://i118.photobucket.com/albums/o100/klaasen3/Sub7/Pretzer073109.jpg)


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3
Post by: doubledecker on July 31, 2009, 07:56:00 PM
also someone has been ringing in the ear of the police that josh has done things to lindsey, all the more reason they probably did talk to him...being that someone saw them fighting and told him to go home, and they police have talked to them, then all the more reason the police probably talked to him about it.  You would think the police have questioned him about the fight etc.  If they didn't then that would really supprise me.  And I find it hard to believe Josh is smarter than the police when it comes to being questioned.  some are though, but from what I am hearing of Josh, I am not sure he could hold a candle to the feds or det's questioning him.  seems he has been caught for the other things he has done, so does he really know how to commit crimes and get away with them, especially a murder and hiding a body. 

these are the things I can't figure out in order to think he did this.  Can a 12 year old do this and lie and not get caught?  yes... but still, hiding the body is the problem I have.


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3
Post by: Rob on July 31, 2009, 07:57:57 PM
I see no way - zero way that Josh could have done this for all the reasons doubledecker listed. In fact, I have considered all those reasons myself but thought that everyone saw it too and didn't want to waste so many keystrokes typing it out.

In fact, I don't see how any of the townies could have done this - atleast not the ones on Lindsey's way home. I also discount all rumors and stories posted by townies that have posted here and on other boards. I have been around long enough to know that townies post all kinds of ludicrous stories... they do it for a multitude of reasons... such as posterity, notoriety and to be a local hero... not to mention getting even with a family they don't like. Those that want to believe them or trust their words - that's up to you.

I'm gonna stick to my original hypothesis - someone off of rt 8 stopping for gas and saw a crime of opportunity. I may be wrong but after 4 + weeks, I don't see the police any closer to arresting someone local. As I said - I may be wrong, but to me this looks like a crime of opportunity where Lindsey was in the wrong place at the RIGHT time.

I would love to see this wrapped up yesterday, I really would. I don't wanna see any child missing, none at all. But I don't think we can make Josh anymore a suspect or POI than we can Watne. All of these people have been check multiple times. Now unless the police are playing some type of game, which I wholeheartedly disagree with, I just do not see how we can label anyone "interesting".

I believe, in my own opinion, that the case is still unsolved simply because the person who abducted Lindsey is not a known person from the community - I could be wrong, but you tell me how a small townie was not been found yet and responsible for this disappearance and the most important question is - where is Lindsey - dead or alive.


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3
Post by: sunshine12 on July 31, 2009, 08:00:47 PM


oh I agree with you that he should not be overlooked at all.  and I believe he is big enough to do something to her either on purpose or accidently if they got into a physical altercation.  I have no problem believing any of those things.  My problem is where would he hide her?  how?  if he hid her someone where he could get her on foot, and if he really is responsible and did this, then she is close... and if she is that close, and he dragged her off somewhere, then they must not have looked very well AT ALL.  that is my problem with this theory... they can't find her where I think he would be able to put her.  either he would have to have help to get her out of there, or they didn't search that town at all.  "IF" he were to have done this. 

It's not even that I don't agree with you that he could have done this, he "could" have, but what did he do with her?  see what I mean?  do you have some ideas where he could have put her or gotten her there?  that is what I can't get past.  believe me, if I could make sense out of where he could have put her, I would be ragging about him just like everyone else.  well maybe not quite as bad, but I would certainly be over here by myself with some huge file of my own going through it. 

if you can tell me something where it seems believeable to me, or even half A$$ believeable to me where he could have hid her, I am more than ready to add him to my list.  the ONLY reason I personally can see that he did it and she is wherever he could have put her, is the police and search dogs are not looking at all.  because if josh dragged her somewhere they should have found her.
[/quote]

i could not agree more.  it has been reported by karak that jb did not have many friends.  part of the reason that wayne watne was looked at so closely on this board was b/c of his connection with jb..it was made to seem from karak that this was his only friend.   i think if jb put her anywhere she def would have been found by now. yes its concerning b/c of the reports about jb and b/c of lindsey's own posts on myspace about him going to "juvi"... but i think all of these things with jb are just a coincidence and hopefully le went over all of this and ruled him out.


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3
Post by: sunshine12 on July 31, 2009, 08:05:33 PM
i'm sorry dd i totally messed up that last post. this was my response to ur last post

i could not agree more.  it has been reported by karak that jb did not have many friends.  part of the reason that wayne watne was looked at so closely on this board was b/c of his connection with jb..it was made to seem from karak that this was his only friend.   i think if jb put her anywhere she def would have been found by now. yes its concerning b/c of the reports about jb and b/c of lindsey's own posts on myspace about him going to "juvi"... but i think all of these things with jb are just a coincidence and hopefully le went over all of this and ruled him out.

rob-i enjoy reading your posts (even though this is such a gruesome subject)


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3
Post by: Tamikosmom on July 31, 2009, 08:08:28 PM
DD

I speculate if something happened to Lindsey at the hands of her brother ... it was completely unplanned.  I am not condoning but ... it could have been possibly provoked and ... he acted impulsively.  At twelve years old ... I believe this young man would have panicked and ... bolted.  In all probability ... no attempt or ... very little attempt at hiding his sister's body.

I believe IF the above scenario took place ... Lindsey will be found in an out-of-sight spot on one of the properties in that two block radius.

Sheriff Scott stated in the search the other day ... that they were calling on neighbours again and requestioning them as well as neighbours who had yet to be contacted.  It does not appear that those properties were search to any extent ... only rural areas.

Also ... when it is considered what a residence said about Josh's behavior at that first vigil in regards to attempting to solicit money for the purchase of fireworks and ... KaraK's words about Josh's behavior at a search effort regarding Josh's only interest was in arranging a playdate with her son ... it appears that he does not comprehend that seriousness of the situation.  A lack of conscience can account for the fact there is no remorse.

DD ... I am only speculating.  Lindsey Baum is missing and ... something happened to her. 

Janet



Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3
Post by: melisb on July 31, 2009, 08:10:50 PM
DD...I finally caught you on here!  Will you just satisfy MY curiosity?  Please check out KaraK's boyfriend/husband.  I'm just not satisified on their end.  Also, any friend could've been on their way to or from their house.  Please?


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3
Post by: doubledecker on July 31, 2009, 08:17:33 PM
I'm just going to brainstorm here, because by rambling and thinking of everything I can that is how I notice things I might otherwise miss.  so whatever I say here is not because I think it true or not; I am only brainstorming. 

does search the creek 6 times.  that is far away from where lindsey was walking.  how would josh get her to that creek down a street full of houses, you can't drag a dead body down a residential street that far... if she was alive and he had ahold of her she would be fighting and yelling. just like in front of the lady who told them to go home, someone would hear them by the time they got all the way to the creek. 

I see you think(or I think that is what you are saying) that she is a couple of blocks from her house.  if he waited for her on the west side of the highway, he can't drag her across there and not be seen by someone.  if he is on the east side of the highway waiting for her, there are houses there too, so where to drag her?  where is the easiest place to drag someone off the road without being seen.

could he have grabbed her off maple into an empty house?  I am sure by now they have searched those houses.  maybe not at first but they are back in there now, so it would really make me go hmmmmm the police are useless if they have not searched those empty buildings by now.  by now a decomposing body should aleart the neighbors and there be flies all over ....sorry, but the truth, so I don't think she would be dead in a house closeby.  is there any way she could be?  I don't know, what am I overlooking? 

who would have helped josh take her out of there?  did he have any friends?  older ones with cars?  can he or someone steal a car...possible... 12 year olds steal cars all the time.  was one reported stolen?  if so did the fingerprint it or test for lindsey being in it, did they find a stolen car he could have used?  we don't know. 

and here is one more question... and I am not saying who I believe at this point but... marylin says there was a 911 report and all this stuff josh has done.  kara says no there is not, yet you site both of them in helping you come to your conclusion josh might be the kind of person to do this.  well, one of them has to be telling the truth and one not... so which is it?  we don't know.  marylin is just another person in nthe "local rumor mill".  we have not seen proof of anything she said.  we can choose to believe her though.  there is no reason to not believe her, there is no reason to believe her, it is our own call.  same with kara, just because she is part of this mess, does not mean we know if she is telling the truth, therefore, she is another part of the "local rumor mill" ... we just don't know.  now do both tell the truth?  do both lie? do both tell the truth sometimes and not the other?  how do we pick and choose what is the truth they tell and what is not.  if we look at the times things don't match up with kara(and understandably a lot of it) then we might decide kara lies, or we might think she just got confused or thought differently than someone else... same with marylin.  but it is a fact these two do not agree with one another.  so how do we pick and choose who to believe, and which parts to believe.  do we believe one part and not the other.  or do we say well I think she lied about this or that, so I can't believe her at all?  so here is another huge problem, we are going by some of the things some of the people say and writing off the other parts.  or we point out some of the things they say are not true or don't match yet we believe the other parts they say.  so I personally consider them as part of the "local rumor mill".  now if I ask kara something and she tells me and I go find the doc or the proof, then I know she is telling me the truth... on the other hand I have not talked to marylin and I have not seen the proof of what she is saying.  we can choose to believe her if we like, and I do believe people at times because I choose to, but we can't know unless we see the reports.  I haven't seen one so I don't know if josh did those things to lindsey or not.  would marylin get on the net and lie about reporting something to the police?  who knows.. .would kara?  who knows.  if josh chased lindsey with shovels and knives, do we believe that?  because someone said so?  could be true.. might not be.  if someone came and said hey they are all cranksters tweaked out of their heads, do we believe that?  hey maybe they are, we don't know.  and maybe the person saying it is the one tweaked out.  so personally how do I know who to believe?  so I have to look for some proof of something or something that makes sense one way or the other.  hiding the body is my problem.  that is my real problem with josh.  if I could figure out how he could hide her body and they not find it with the dogs etc... or in a search of the area where he could have dragged a body... then I might see this more believeable that he did this.   


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3
Post by: love4ever on July 31, 2009, 08:18:42 PM
Hi...almost done with my studies, one more research paper and I am done!! YAY..

Took a break from it all to come here!...
~Love~


PHERNETTON, RICHARD ALLEN

Booked
7/20/2009 21:00    
Statute:
10.88.320 - Fugitive From Justice Other St
Offense:
SOFF - Sex Offense
Arrest Type:
PC
Charging Agency:
MPD-Montesano Police Department
Court:
SC2-GHC Superior Court 2
Cause No:
09-1-307-9
Released
7/31/2009 09:00    

Bail Amount:
No Bail
Disposition:
ROA-Released to Other Agency



Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3
Post by: no rose colored glasses on July 31, 2009, 08:20:08 PM
DD...I finally caught you on here!  Will you just satisfy MY curiosity?  Please check out KaraK's boyfriend/husband.  I'm just not satisified on their end.  Also, any friend could've been on their way to or from their house.  Please?
Interesting, and I'm glad you are asking her, thanks. There is something about Josh that bothers me very much, but you are right, if he did do something to his sister, LE would surely have found Lindsey by now, I do have a problem of where he would have put her. And I'm sure, at least I hope LE have spoken several times to Josh.


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3
Post by: love4ever on July 31, 2009, 08:20:17 PM
Cited for above post:

http://www.co.grays-harbor.wa.us/info/sheriff/JailRegisters/RegisterDetail.asp?SrchBookNo=173193


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3
Post by: love4ever on July 31, 2009, 08:24:42 PM
COLE, ERIC JOHN

Booked
7/10/2009 15:20    
Statute:
9A.44.130 - Fail To Reg Sex/Kidnap Offendr
Offense:
WARA - Warrant Arrest
Arrest Type:
WAR
Charging Agency:
GHCJ-Grays Harbor County Jail
Court:
DC1-Grays Harbor District Court 1
Cause No:
2002131
Released
7/31/2009 15:20
   
Bail Amount:
$5,000.00

Disposition:
TS-Time Served
               
http://www.co.grays-harbor.wa.us/info/sheriff/JailRegisters/RegisterDetail.asp?SrchBookNo=173026


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3
Post by: doubledecker on July 31, 2009, 08:25:34 PM
DD

I speculate if something happened to Lindsey at the hands of her brother ... it was completely unplanned.  I am not condoning but ... it could have been possibly provoked and ... he acted impulsively.  At twelve years old ... I believe this young man would have panicked and ... bolted.  In all probability ... no attempt or ... very little attempt at hiding his sister's body.

I believe IF the above scenario took place ... Lindsey will be found in an out-of-sight spot on one of the properties in that two block radius.

Sheriff Scott stated in the search the other day ... that they were calling on neighbours again and requestioning them as well as neighbours who had yet to be contacted.  It does not appear that those properties were search to any extent ... only rural areas.

Also ... when it is considered what a residence said about Josh's behavior at that first vigil in regards to attempting to solicit money for the purchase of fireworks and ... KaraK's words about Josh's behavior at a search effort regarding Josh's only interest was in arranging a playdate with her son ... it appears that he does not comprehend that seriousness of the situation.  A lack of conscience can account for the fact there is no remorse.

DD ... I am only speculating.  Lindsey Baum is missing and ... something happened to her. 

Janet



now if the police did not check well I could see josh could do something to her and she was left lying there, could have even been accidental in an arguement, a shove and hit her head or whatever... but if she is just left lying out there within 2 blocks why have they not found her is my question... that is the only thing that makes this not work for me.  a month of heat and no one notices a dead body within 2 blocks?  I don't understand how that can happen.  If you know how that can happen or have an idea that might work, I am more than willing to go hmmmm, hey maybe he did do it. 

I look at every possible scenario imagineable, everyone should know that by now.  gee I have dug up everything I can find on everyone, I don't care who they are, and all the while I have my own ideas over here in my head what I think might be... but I am more than willing to work on anything and everything because that is just how I am... I know my own opinion is only as good as every other opinion and at times my own is a lot less believeable haha.  so I really am trying to figure this one out so I can figure out where her body would be if josh did something to her, or where she would be if he locked her up somewhere. 


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3
Post by: Rob on July 31, 2009, 08:25:38 PM

rob-i enjoy reading your posts (even though this is such a gruesome subject)


sunshine12 thanks you for the kind words and deciphering my gibberish  ::MonkeyAngel:: I think, like Klaas, I'm a realist and look for would really could have happened and not what I want to pin on someone.

Trust me, there are certainly enough people around that we could all rail road, but that doesn't solve a case or bring closer for a family. And as far as I know - only one case has ever been solved on the net and that's not likely to happen too many moire times... but that doesn't mean that we should try.

As in Adji's case- I have always believed that was a local predator in the farmer's village. So close and the police missed it. In fact I think I know who did it.

As in Caylee's case - I always believed that Casey killed Caylee and the parents helped her along the way and should be charged with obstruction.

In Brooke Bennett's case I always believed it was the uncle and had her body within .1 of a mile of it's final locale.

In Madeleine McCann's case I always thought it was a predator and a seasoned predator at that. I never believed that Gerry and Kate committed a crime that was without a body while on holiday. I never wanted Gerry and Kate as my GP or a neighbor and certainly not a family member, but I never ever suspected them as the Portuguese police did.

I could list many other cases but that's not helping find Lindsey. And in her case - I'm not seeing a local as the culprit, I could be wrong and the goal is not to be right but to find a clue or commonality that helps find a child that is missing.


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3
Post by: Tamikosmom on July 31, 2009, 08:29:00 PM
DD

When I consider the Jessica Lunford case.  This precious little girl was found burird on a property a stone throw away from her home weeks following her disappearance.  In the meantime search efforts were being conducted far and wide.

In the process of elimination ... I consider Josh Baum a person of interest unless he was sitting at home with his Mom between 9:15 PM and 9:30 PM ... the time Lindsey left the Baum residence.  This is where he should have been if he had adhered to the instructions of the "friend of the family" who intervened in the bike argument between him and his sister.

Janet




Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3
Post by: doubledecker on July 31, 2009, 08:34:19 PM
DD...I finally caught you on here!  Will you just satisfy MY curiosity?  Please check out KaraK's boyfriend/husband.  I'm just not satisified on their end.  Also, any friend could've been on their way to or from their house.  Please?

to be truthful, kara and scott(her bf) were my very first people to look at along with kara's brother wesley and her sister in law michelle flostrom/sheedy.  because kara was on the board I did not put all that stuff out here LOL  but I was behind the scenes asking her straight up about anything I wondered about and if I found something I told her and asked her to explain it.  I did not overlook a one of them.  believe me, poor kara probably thought omg this woman thinks we did this.  but she stuck with me and answered me and even gave me more info that I doubt most people would.  hey I even asked her if she were involved in drugs and could someone be mad at her and thought because lindsey left her house it was one of her kids... I asked her everything.  I checked them out in AZ, all over washington etc.  I checked out her relatives.  I know about her bf and I asked her a lot of things.  I had wondered if lindsey ever really left that house or if she left and one of them caught up with her for whatever reason.  I just did not post all this stuff because she was on the board and I thought perhaps she would leave if I started posting that stuff on here, so I emailed it all to here and asked.  I didn't find anything bad on her bf or her.  doesn't mean I didn't miss something.  so what is my take on them.  truthfully.  I don't know, but nothing for me to go wow they did this.  you have no idea what I thought might have happened when this first started.  I really ragged kara.  I'm supprised she did not tell me off good.  LOL but she didn't.  had it been vise verse.. she would have got an earful from me LOL


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3
Post by: doubledecker on July 31, 2009, 08:35:13 PM
DD...I finally caught you on here!  Will you just satisfy MY curiosity?  Please check out KaraK's boyfriend/husband.  I'm just not satisified on their end.  Also, any friend could've been on their way to or from their house.  Please?

if you have some thoughts let me know, I will check...


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3
Post by: doubledecker on July 31, 2009, 08:40:43 PM
Hi...almost done with my studies, one more research paper and I am done!! YAY..

Took a break from it all to come here!...
~Love~


PHERNETTON, RICHARD ALLEN

Booked
7/20/2009 21:00    
Statute:
10.88.320 - Fugitive From Justice Other St
Offense:
SOFF - Sex Offense
Arrest Type:
PC
Charging Agency:
MPD-Montesano Police Department
Court:
SC2-GHC Superior Court 2
Cause No:
09-1-307-9
Released
7/31/2009 09:00    

Bail Amount:
No Bail
Disposition:
ROA-Released to Other Agency



well they probably transported him back to wisconsin where he abscounded from... or hmmmmmm 


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3
Post by: love4ever on July 31, 2009, 08:41:16 PM
DD, do we know who the family friend is that is said to have sent Josh home after Lindsey and him argue?


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3
Post by: melisb on July 31, 2009, 08:42:41 PM
I asked her lots of ?'s too and she did answer but I'm not there looking at her, not that I'm an expert at anything, it just would make some sense if Scott left home for a little while and caught up with Lindsey.  Just trying to make sense out of things that shouldn't have happened anyway.  Thank you so much DD for your swift reply.  I really appreciate it.


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3
Post by: love4ever on July 31, 2009, 08:43:43 PM
DD, do we know who the family friend is that is said to have sent Josh home after Lindsey and him argue?

after they saw Lindsey and him arguing****sorry-tired


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3
Post by: doubledecker on July 31, 2009, 08:45:26 PM
DD

When I consider the Jessica Lunford case.  This precious little girl was found burird on a property a stone throw away from her home weeks following her disappearance.  In the meantime search efforts were being conducted far and wide.

In the process of elimination ... I consider Josh Baum a person of interest unless he was sitting at home with his Mom between 9:15 PM and 9:30 PM ... the time Lindsey left the Baum residence.  This is where he should have been if he had adhered to the instructions of the "friend of the family" who intervened in the bike argument between him and his sister.

Janet




hmm very true about Jessica Lunford... she was right there.  I did not follow that case but did know a little about it... friend followed it extensively... so... how did they miss her?  could they miss lindsey the same way. 


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3
Post by: Tamikosmom on July 31, 2009, 08:47:28 PM
DD, do we know who the family friend is that is said to have sent Josh home after Lindsey and him argue?

Melissa Baum does not reveal the name of the "family friend" who intervened in the argument between Josh and Lindsey.

Janet

++++++

MELISSA BAUM

Where is Lindsey Baum? Police, FBI Search for 10-Year-Old
Girl's Mother Frantic After Lindsey Never Made it Home From a Friend's House
By SARAH NETTER
June 30, 2009

Baum said her children began squabbling over the use of Josh's bike on the way there and were stopped by a family friend who sent Josh home to end the argument. Lindsey continued on to her friend's house. When Lindsey's friend found out she couldn't stay the night, Lindsey headed for home around 9:30 p.m.

"When she wasn't home by 10, I started to get nervous," Baum said, adding that 10 p.m. is the curfew for her children.
 
http://abcnews.go.com/US/story?id=7966924&page=1


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3
Post by: doubledecker on July 31, 2009, 08:48:31 PM
DD, do we know who the family friend is that is said to have sent Josh home after Lindsey and him argue?

I THINK I might LOL  but I can't post that and i have only a first name.  so I have not been able to find them.  hard to find someone with only a first name. 


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3
Post by: love4ever on July 31, 2009, 08:51:34 PM
DD, do we know who the family friend is that is said to have sent Josh home after Lindsey and him argue?

I THINK I might LOL  but I can't post that and i have only a first name.  so I have not been able to find them.  hard to find someone with only a first name. 

Brat..lol


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3
Post by: doubledecker on July 31, 2009, 08:52:06 PM
I asked her lots of ?'s too and she did answer but I'm not there looking at her, not that I'm an expert at anything, it just would make some sense if Scott left home for a little while and caught up with Lindsey.  Just trying to make sense out of things that shouldn't have happened anyway.  Thank you so much DD for your swift reply.  I really appreciate it.


well that was one of my very first questions... did lindsey leave there house and one of them caught up with her for whatever reason? or someone from their house.  do I KNOW if that happened or not NO, there is no way for me to KNOW that.  someone even told me someone else lived at that house.  I tried to find this person, never found anything like that and I asked her too.  said she never heard of the person.  I can't find anything that says anyone else lived there.  did they?  who knows.  I can't find anything that says they did, other than the person saying it. 


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3
Post by: doubledecker on July 31, 2009, 08:54:42 PM
DD, do we know who the family friend is that is said to have sent Josh home after Lindsey and him argue?

I THINK I might LOL  but I can't post that and i have only a first name.  so I have not been able to find them.  hard to find someone with only a first name. 

I know, but if I say things I promise not to say how long do you think people will tell me anything LOL   I am true to my word when researching these cases, if someone tells me something and tells me for good reason not to tell it, I won't. 

Brat..lol


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3
Post by: no rose colored glasses on July 31, 2009, 08:54:50 PM
DD...I finally caught you on here!  Will you just satisfy MY curiosity?  Please check out KaraK's boyfriend/husband.  I'm just not satisified on their end.  Also, any friend could've been on their way to or from their house.  Please?

to be truthful, kara and scott(her bf) were my very first people to look at along with kara's brother wesley and her sister in law michelle flostrom/sheedy.  because kara was on the board I did not put all that stuff out here LOL  but I was behind the scenes asking her straight up about anything I wondered about and if I found something I told her and asked her to explain it.  I did not overlook a one of them.  believe me, poor kara probably thought omg this woman thinks we did this.  but she stuck with me and answered me and even gave me more info that I doubt most people would.  hey I even asked her if she were involved in drugs and could someone be mad at her and thought because lindsey left her house it was one of her kids... I asked her everything.  I checked them out in AZ, all over washington etc.  I checked out her relatives.  I know about her bf and I asked her a lot of things.  I had wondered if lindsey ever really left that house or if she left and one of them caught up with her for whatever reason.  I just did not post all this stuff because she was on the board and I thought perhaps she would leave if I started posting that stuff on here, so I emailed it all to here and asked.  I didn't find anything bad on her bf or her.  doesn't mean I didn't miss something.  so what is my take on them.  truthfully.  I don't know, but nothing for me to go wow they did this.  you have no idea what I thought might have happened when this first started.  I really ragged kara.  I'm supprised she did not tell me off good.  LOL but she didn't.  had it been vise verse.. she would have got an earful from me LOL
Thank-you, I certainly had my suspicions.


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3
Post by: doubledecker on July 31, 2009, 08:55:29 PM
DD, do we know who the family friend is that is said to have sent Josh home after Lindsey and him argue?

I THINK I might LOL  but I can't post that and i have only a first name.  so I have not been able to find them.  hard to find someone with only a first name. 



Brat..lol
fixing my own post, got inside the quote

I know, but if I say things I promise not to say how long do you think people will tell me anything LOL   I am true to my word when researching these cases, if someone tells me something and tells me for good reason not to tell it, I won't. 


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3
Post by: doubledecker on July 31, 2009, 08:56:18 PM
DD, do we know who the family friend is that is said to have sent Josh home after Lindsey and him argue?

I THINK I might LOL  but I can't post that and i have only a first name.  so I have not been able to find them.  hard to find someone with only a first name. 



Brat..lol
fixing my own post, got inside the quote

I know, but if I say things I promise not to say how long do you think people will tell me anything LOL   I am true to my word when researching these cases, if someone tells me something and tells me for good reason not to tell it, I won't. 


well crap DD posted the above part


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3
Post by: melisb on July 31, 2009, 08:56:57 PM
Exactly what I was thinking DD!  I still think they deserve another looksee!


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3
Post by: AZSunny on July 31, 2009, 08:58:06 PM
DD-excellent post.  i think that obviously there are some concerns with jb... but i agree with you that i can't seem to come up with any plausible scenario in which he could have been responsible for lb's disappearance.

the only thing i can think of that could be possible (yet extremely far fetched) is if he dug a deep hole in the woods somewhere and had this planned out, which i find almost impossible.

if he was involved, i dont see how he did this alone. if it was a plot w/friends i dont see how someone hasn't talked yet, or how the rumor mill hasnt started on that.

i originally thought maybe an older teen was responsible for this, but the more time that has passed, and the more i have read on the research everyone has been doing on people, the more i think this was an adult aquantince.

I'm more than willing to listen to the reasons and HOW he could have done this and they not find her, but I just can't figure out myself how come they have not found her if josh did this.  I can't figure out where he would have put her that they can't find her.  I know people can do things together and stay quiet. I am a firm believer in mulitple perps doing stuff together and no one every telling.  but who would have helped Josh.  that is the question.  I can't see how he could hide her by himself.

even if he had a place to hide her, he had to get her there.  if he dragged her on the ground the dogs would know.  if he got her in an empty house or building in town, wouldn't someone know it by now?  in this heat? 

does he have an older friend who drives who would help him?  who would that be.  does he know anyone THAT well who would do that?  where is the "friend" if there is one?  has he been known to hang out with anyone who is that good of friend of his? 

I just don't have any answers to help me with this.

Wayne Watne is an adult he knows and is a friend in the immediate area.   

I can't figure out however how he would do this on the walk, in daylight conditions.  He did have access to the wheel barrow he had used previously that was at the house across from the shell station.    I am still thinking this was an adult, or young adult involved.  I think that Josh must have some learning disabilites and emotional problems.  From what has been said, it appears he is ADD as well.


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3
Post by: AZSunny on July 31, 2009, 08:59:03 PM
Again ... it would be interesting to know what time Josh Baum got home on the evening of June 26, 2009.  Did he go home as the neighbour who intervened in the argument had instructed?  If he was at home with Mom prior to Lindsey's leaving the Kampen resident between 9:15 PM and 9:30 PM then this wannabe detective's speculation will go in another direction.

Janet


Do we know when the mother got home, or if she was home the entire time? 


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3
Post by: love4ever on July 31, 2009, 08:59:08 PM
DD, do we know who the family friend is that is said to have sent Josh home after Lindsey and him argue?

I THINK I might LOL  but I can't post that and i have only a first name.  so I have not been able to find them.  hard to find someone with only a first name. 



Brat..lol
fixing my own post, got inside the quote

I know, but if I say things I promise not to say how long do you think people will tell me anything LOL   I am true to my word when researching these cases, if someone tells me something and tells me for good reason not to tell it, I won't. 


well crap DD posted the above part

I understand..


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3
Post by: love4ever on July 31, 2009, 09:06:27 PM
lol..i did it too!


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3
Post by: cecilita on July 31, 2009, 09:11:05 PM
hello monkeys ::MonkeyDance::
the person sent josh home knew that lindsey will go back home alone.


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3
Post by: Tamikosmom on July 31, 2009, 09:11:35 PM
Again ... it would be interesting to know what time Josh Baum got home on the evening of June 26, 2009.  Did he go home as the neighbour who intervened in the argument had instructed?  If he was at home with Mom prior to Lindsey's leaving the Kampen resident between 9:15 PM and 9:30 PM then this wannabe detective's speculation will go in another direction.

Janet


Do we know when the mother got home, or if she was home the entire time? 

 ::MonkeyShocked::

AZSunny ... according to Sheriff Scott ... Melissa Baum passed a polygraph.  I would assume this would rule Lindsey's mom out as committing wrongdoing or having knowledge of wrongdoing.

Janet

+++++


Grays Harbor County Undersheriff Rick Scott

KOMO News – July 2, 2009

The missing girl's mother, who wanted avoid becoming the center of the investigation, voluntarily took a polygraph test. The father of the girl's best friend, Scott Williams, also volunteered to take the test.

"At their requests polygraphs were given to them. They passed those polygraphs. We're comfortable with the information they've shared with us and comfortable with the timeline they've explained," said Grays Harbor County Undersheriff Rick Scott.

http://www.komonews.com/news/49651607.html




Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3
Post by: love4ever on July 31, 2009, 09:12:26 PM
DD, with all the names listed in Grays harbor county jail for So's failing to register, rape and molestation...and have arresting dates after Lindsey went missing..when researching do you keep that open as an option?


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3
Post by: Tamikosmom on July 31, 2009, 09:12:47 PM
I asked her lots of ?'s too and she did answer but I'm not there looking at her, not that I'm an expert at anything, it just would make some sense if Scott left home for a little while and caught up with Lindsey.  Just trying to make sense out of things that shouldn't have happened anyway.  Thank you so much DD for your swift reply.  I really appreciate it.


Scott Williams voluntarily took a polygraph and passed accounting to Sheriff Scott.

Janet

++++++++

Grays Harbor County Undersheriff Rick Scott

KOMO News – July 2, 2009

The missing girl's mother, who wanted avoid becoming the center of the investigation, voluntarily took a polygraph test. The father of the girl's best friend, Scott Williams, also volunteered to take the test.

"At their requests polygraphs were given to them. They passed those polygraphs. We're comfortable with the information they've shared with us and comfortable with the timeline they've explained," said Grays Harbor County Undersheriff Rick Scott.

http://www.komonews.com/news/49651607.html


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3
Post by: no rose colored glasses on July 31, 2009, 09:14:36 PM
hello monkeys ::MonkeyDance::
the person sent josh home knew that lindsey will go back home alone.
Hi Cecilita, now that's interesting, I sure wish we knew who this person was, I think it was a woman.


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3
Post by: doubledecker on July 31, 2009, 09:15:25 PM
Exactly what I was thinking DD!  I still think they deserve another looksee!

must be some reason you think that LOL  did you find something ?


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3
Post by: cecilita on July 31, 2009, 09:17:56 PM
hello monkeys ::MonkeyDance::
the person sent josh home knew that Lindsey will go back home alone.
Hi Cecilita, now that's interesting, I sure wish we knew who this person was, I think it was a woman.
Hi rose,
I am reading about Lindsay brother and what I read I think that he molested his sister? if that is true was easy for him to go home stay for awhile there and then see Lindsey on her way back to home and take her to somewhere else and dosthing to her. If she has been molested by him I believe that he had a lot of control on her and she will do whatever he wants only for fear


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3
Post by: doubledecker on July 31, 2009, 09:19:58 PM
DD, with all the names listed in Grays harbor county jail for So's failing to register, rape and molestation...and have arresting dates after Lindsey went missing..when researching do you keep that open as an option?

yes.  but I haven't kept up with all of them, but everytime someone mentions one, I look as much as I have time to look.  it takes me a long time to go through all possible connections because I have to use several data bases and keep going back and forth, not like I have the good ones the feds have LOL  so it takes forever to go through all this stuff on one person, but I try to do as many as I can.  then if I find something interesting I look more.


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3
Post by: love4ever on July 31, 2009, 09:24:50 PM
DD, with all the names listed in Grays harbor county jail for So's failing to register, rape and molestation...and have arresting dates after Lindsey went missing..when researching do you keep that open as an option?

yes.  but I haven't kept up with all of them, but everytime someone mentions one, I look as much as I have time to look.  it takes me a long time to go through all possible connections because I have to use several data bases and keep going back and forth, not like I have the good ones the feds have LOL  so it takes forever to go through all this stuff on one person, but I try to do as many as I can.  then if I find something interesting I look more.

There are so many DD, even one on immigration hold who was arrested for rape of a child on July 6th 2009...


HERMENEJILDO-PACHECO, MARTIN

Statute:
9A.44.073 - Rape of a Child 1

http://www.co.grays-harbor.wa.us/info/sheriff/JailRegisters/RegisterDetail.asp?SrchBookNo=172993


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3
Post by: no rose colored glasses on July 31, 2009, 09:27:13 PM
hello monkeys ::MonkeyDance::
the person sent josh home knew that Lindsey will go back home alone.
Hi Cecilita, now that's interesting, I sure wish we knew who this person was, I think it was a woman.
Hi rose,
I am reading about Lindsay brother and what I read I think that he molested his sister? if that is true was easy for him to go home stay for awhile there and then see Lindsey on her way back to home and take her to somewhere else and dosthing to her. If she has been molested by him I believe that he had a lot of control on her and she will do whatever he wants only for fear
I haven't read that, there are some rumors that he was rather mean to her, but don't know if that is true.  ::MonkeyEek::


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3
Post by: love4ever on July 31, 2009, 09:57:41 PM
CORONADO, MICHAEL JOSEPH

http://www.co.grays-harbor.wa.us/info/sheriff/JailRegisters/RegisterDetail.asp?SrchBookNo=173242
   
DEITRICK, BRANDON SCOTT

http://www.co.grays-harbor.wa.us/info/sheriff/JailRegisters/RegisterDetail.asp?SrchBookNo=173288

HUFF, BRANDY MARIE

http://www.co.grays-harbor.wa.us/info/sheriff/JailRegisters/RegisterDetail.asp?SrchBookNo=173377

LUDINGTON, DEREK ROBERT

http://www.co.grays-harbor.wa.us/info/sheriff/JailRegisters/RegisterDetail.asp?SrchBookNo=173234

Here's some some DD..I have to finish my studies....


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3
Post by: love4ever on July 31, 2009, 10:09:11 PM
Pierce County

Today

Booking Date / Time: 
07/31/2009 16:23

WITEK, ADAM WILLIAM

Resist arrest
Fail to register S/O

http://www.co.pierce.wa.us/cfapps/linx/calendar/GetBooking.cfm?booking_id=2009212043


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3
Post by: love4ever on July 31, 2009, 10:15:44 PM
LOUGH, RYAN ANTHONY     
Booking Date / Time:    07/31/2009 15:12

CHILD RAPE 1


http://www.co.pierce.wa.us/cfapps/linx/calendar/GetBooking.cfm?booking_id=2009212034


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3
Post by: doubledecker on July 31, 2009, 10:19:53 PM
thanks love4ever, I will put them in the list and check to see if they connect to anything.


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3
Post by: sunshine12 on July 31, 2009, 10:19:59 PM
hello monkeys ::MonkeyDance::
the person sent josh home knew that Lindsey will go back home alone.
Hi Cecilita, now that's interesting, I sure wish we knew who this person was, I think it was a woman.
Hi rose,
I am reading about Lindsay brother and what I read I think that he molested his sister? if that is true was easy for him to go home stay for awhile there and then see Lindsey on her way back to home and take her to somewhere else and dosthing to her. If she has been molested by him I believe that he had a lot of control on her and she will do whatever he wants only for fear


no, i believe what was said is that a child setting fires can be a sign of sexual abuse however that is just in general, not specific about jb.


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3
Post by: love4ever on July 31, 2009, 10:24:34 PM
GOMM, ARRON C     

Arrest Date
02/28/2009 01:34

Out on temporary release

GOMM, ARRON C     

TAKING MOTOR VEHICLE WITHOUT PERMISSION 2ND

FAILING TO REGISTER AS A SEX OFFENDER


http://www.co.pierce.wa.us/cfapps/linx/calendar/GetBooking.cfm?booking_id=2009059012


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3
Post by: love4ever on July 31, 2009, 10:28:29 PM
COOMBS, JERRY GERALD     

Booking Date / Time:
   07/31/2009 08:31

FAILING TO REGISTER AS A SEX OFFENDER

HOLD FOR MISC. STATE AGENCY


http://www.co.pierce.wa.us/cfapps/linx/calendar/GetBooking.cfm?booking_id=2009212016


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3
Post by: love4ever on July 31, 2009, 10:31:21 PM
thanks love4ever, I will put them in the list and check to see if they connect to anything.


You are welcome, always DD, there everywhere for godsakes ::MonkeyNoNo::


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3
Post by: Tamikosmom on July 31, 2009, 10:32:11 PM
Did Josh Baum go straight home following the argument he had with his sister as instructed by the "family friend" or ... was there an encounter Lindsey in in the short distance between the neighbours observation and their home?

Was Josh still harboring resentment toward his sister in regards to the dispute over the bike that had taken place 30 minutes prior?

Janet

+++++++


KaraK
Re: Lindsey Baum, 10y missing from McCleary, WA 6/26/09
« Reply #1936 on: July 10, 2009, 07:07:48 PM »


The conversation was apparently quite short and consisted of little more then a "Josh you need to go home" Josh trying to explain what was going on and the girls asking the lady to tell Josh to go home again.
 
http://scaredmonkeys.net/index.php?topic=5541.msg873229#msg873229


The Daily World - July 3, 2009

Kampen said she has replayed that Friday evening in her head over and over. So has her daughter, Michaela, 10, who spent the day swimming with Lindsey. They walked together with Josh Baum, 13, to the Kampen house. But halfway there, Michaela said they teased Josh, getting under his skin ...

http://scaredmonkeys.net/index.php?topic=5541.msg863022


KaraK
Re: Lindsey Baum, 10y missing from McCleary, WA 6/26/09
« Reply #1809 on: July 09, 2009, 04:33:45 AM »


Josh had gotten into so many spats that honestly were in a large part things he did not start but because he was the oldest he was the one who got in trouble. I've set down kids I've never met before to have a talk with them because I heard that they were antagonizing him to see if he'd blow up.

http://scaredmonkeys.net/index.php?topic=5541.msg871164;topicseen#msg871164




Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3
Post by: Tamikosmom on July 31, 2009, 10:34:46 PM
I feel for Josh Baum ... my heart breaks.  Many anger issues that follow children into adulthood are rooted in experiences akin to those that KaraK describes.

Nevertheless ... a little ten year girl is missing and ... all avenues in the course of the investigation must be persued.  Justice for Lindsey Baum dictates that no free passes are handed out based on circumstances.

Janet

++++++


KaraK
Re: Lindsey Baum, 10y missing from McCleary, WA 6/26/09
« Reply #1809 on: July 09, 2009, 04:33:45 AM »


Josh had gotten into so many spats that honestly were in a large part things he did not start but because he was the oldest he was the one who got in trouble. I've set down kids I've never met before to have a talk with them because I heard that they were antagonizing him to see if he'd blow up.

http://scaredmonkeys.net/index.php?topic=5541.msg871164;topicseen#msg871164

Kara Kampen – Mother of Lindsey’s friend Michaela.


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3
Post by: A_News_Junkie_Monkey on July 31, 2009, 10:35:40 PM
CORONADO, MICHAEL JOSEPH

http://www.co.grays-harbor.wa.us/info/sheriff/JailRegisters/RegisterDetail.asp?SrchBookNo=173242
   
DEITRICK, BRANDON SCOTT

http://www.co.grays-harbor.wa.us/info/sheriff/JailRegisters/RegisterDetail.asp?SrchBookNo=173288

HUFF, BRANDY MARIE

http://www.co.grays-harbor.wa.us/info/sheriff/JailRegisters/RegisterDetail.asp?SrchBookNo=173377

LUDINGTON, DEREK ROBERT

http://www.co.grays-harbor.wa.us/info/sheriff/JailRegisters/RegisterDetail.asp?SrchBookNo=173234

Here's some some DD..I have to finish my studies....

Love4Ever:
The one I highlighted comes up:
 INDALECIO-PEREZ, PAUBLO     
Book# 173377
ID:     85425         
Male,  Age: 33


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3
Post by: love4ever on July 31, 2009, 10:37:52 PM
BITZ, ANDREW MATHUE

Booking Date / Time:  07/31/2009 08:32

CHILD MOLESTATION 1ST

HOLD FOR MISC. STATE AGENCY


http://www.co.pierce.wa.us/cfapps/linx/calendar/GetBooking.cfm?booking_id=2009212017

BERNAL, WILLIAM TROY

Booking Date / Time:     07/31/2009 10:28

FAILING TO REGISTER AS A SEX OFFENDER

http://www.co.pierce.wa.us/cfapps/linx/calendar/GetBooking.cfm?booking_id=2009212020



You know what DD? It makes me happy that these arrests were all done in one day...It shows that the LE are trying...



Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3
Post by: Tamikosmom on July 31, 2009, 10:38:28 PM

In the process of elimination ... I hope that the concerns of McCleary residents in regards to Lindsey's brother were not not disregarded by Undersheriff Rick Scott.  I hope the concerns of MccCeary residents were taken seriously and ... Josh Baum was not ruled out as a person of interest without investigation ... without questioning and ... without searching.

Janet

++++++++

Grays Harbor Undersheriff Rick Scott

The Olympian - June 30, 2009

Lindsey left her cell phone at home before leaving to play with friends Friday, said Grays Harbor Undersheriff Rick Scott. Lindsey’s older brother had left the Maple Street residence before his sister after the two had a dispute over the bike Lindsey had borrowed from him that day – a common occurrence between frequently squabbling siblings, Scott added.

http://www.theolympian.com/southsound/story/896613.html


Residents of McCleary Speak Out

mlachester 1 day ago wrote:


... Its no big secret she had came to my house to call 911 when her brother had done things to her.

http://www.king5.com/topstories/stories/NW_063009WAB-Mccleary-girl-search-LJ.1fc0b759.html?ocp=2#slcgm_comments_anchor


mlachester 2 hours ago wrote:

I am close to her and I know a lot more than the media or law enforcement are saying right now. … Sorry if you don't like the truth but I have never been one to keep the truth in and she should of been taken the first time she called 911 from my house asking for help instead of put in a police car and taken back to her abuser!"

http://www.king5.com/topstories/stor...omments_anchor


mamahead 13 hours ago wrote:
 
Lindsey has been afraid of her brother for a very long time.  He has threatned her many times. Where is she? And why is the mother not crazy with sadness or emotion. Show us some tears. The friend that Lindsey was last with shows more emotion than the mother. And why was the brother begging for money for fireworks at his little sisters candlelight vigil?

http://www.king5.com/topstories/stories/NW_070609WAB-missing-mccleary-girl-SW.14c01624.html


Lindsey Baum

Lindsey Baum:  Facebook Entry

TWILIGHT FREAK is happy that her brother is going to juvi tomorrow.Mood: happ at 14:10 17 Jun view more

Lindsey Baum is happy that her brother is going to juvie tomorrow.
Mood: Happ at 14:10 17 June

http://www.myspace.com/477760045


Melissa Baum

KING 5 News – July 2, 2009


If a stranger kidnapped 10-year-old Lindsey Baum, her mother says the girl would have put up a fight

“She has very long fingernails,” said Melissa Baum. “Her brother is proof enough of that.”

http://www.king5.com/topstories/stories/NW_070209WAB-mccleary-KS.67b0a9.html



Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3
Post by: A_News_Junkie_Monkey on July 31, 2009, 10:38:38 PM
CORONADO, MICHAEL JOSEPH

http://www.co.grays-harbor.wa.us/info/sheriff/JailRegisters/RegisterDetail.asp?SrchBookNo=173242
   
DEITRICK, BRANDON SCOTT

http://www.co.grays-harbor.wa.us/info/sheriff/JailRegisters/RegisterDetail.asp?SrchBookNo=173288

HUFF, BRANDY MARIE

http://www.co.grays-harbor.wa.us/info/sheriff/JailRegisters/RegisterDetail.asp?SrchBookNo=173377

LUDINGTON, DEREK ROBERT

http://www.co.grays-harbor.wa.us/info/sheriff/JailRegisters/RegisterDetail.asp?SrchBookNo=173234

Here's some some DD..I have to finish my studies....

Love4Ever:
The one I highlighted comes up:
 INDALECIO-PEREZ, PAUBLO     
Book# 173377
ID:     85425         
Male,  Age: 33


Well, that didn't work out to well!   It was this originally: 
HUFF, BRANDY MARIE

http://www.co.grays-harbor.wa.us/info/sheriff/JailRegisters/RegisterDetail.asp?SrchBookNo=173377

but I am not getting Brandy Huff.


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3
Post by: love4ever on July 31, 2009, 10:39:35 PM
CORONADO, MICHAEL JOSEPH

http://www.co.grays-harbor.wa.us/info/sheriff/JailRegisters/RegisterDetail.asp?SrchBookNo=173242
   
DEITRICK, BRANDON SCOTT

http://www.co.grays-harbor.wa.us/info/sheriff/JailRegisters/RegisterDetail.asp?SrchBookNo=173288

HUFF, BRANDY MARIE

http://www.co.grays-harbor.wa.us/info/sheriff/JailRegisters/RegisterDetail.asp?SrchBookNo=173377

LUDINGTON, DEREK ROBERT

http://www.co.grays-harbor.wa.us/info/sheriff/JailRegisters/RegisterDetail.asp?SrchBookNo=173234

Here's some some DD..I have to finish my studies....

Love4Ever:
The one I highlighted comes up:
 INDALECIO-PEREZ, PAUBLO     
Book# 173377
ID:     85425         
Male,  Age: 33




Sorry about that...here is the correct link for DEITRICK, BRANDON SCOTT...

http://www.co.grays-harbor.wa.us/info/sheriff/JailRegisters/RegisterDetail.asp?SrchBookNo=171161


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3
Post by: love4ever on July 31, 2009, 10:40:04 PM
LOL..I have too many windows open


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3
Post by: A_News_Junkie_Monkey on July 31, 2009, 10:42:02 PM
LOL..I have too many windows open

His was right - it was the female - Brandy that came up a male!


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3
Post by: love4ever on July 31, 2009, 10:44:13 PM
omg, I got it wrong again!!


DEITRICK, BRANDON SCOTT

Fail To Reg Sex/Kidnap Offendr


http://www.co.grays-harbor.wa.us/info/sheriff/JailRegisters/RegisterDetail.asp?SrchBookNo=173288


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3
Post by: A_News_Junkie_Monkey on July 31, 2009, 10:44:56 PM
CORONADO, MICHAEL JOSEPH

http://www.co.grays-harbor.wa.us/info/sheriff/JailRegisters/RegisterDetail.asp?SrchBookNo=173242
   
DEITRICK, BRANDON SCOTT

http://www.co.grays-harbor.wa.us/info/sheriff/JailRegisters/RegisterDetail.asp?SrchBookNo=173288

HUFF, BRANDY MARIE

http://www.co.grays-harbor.wa.us/info/sheriff/JailRegisters/RegisterDetail.asp?SrchBookNo=173377

LUDINGTON, DEREK ROBERT

http://www.co.grays-harbor.wa.us/info/sheriff/JailRegisters/RegisterDetail.asp?SrchBookNo=173234

Here's some some DD..I have to finish my studies....

Love4Ever:
The one I highlighted comes up:
 INDALECIO-PEREZ, PAUBLO     
Book# 173377
ID:     85425         
Male,  Age: 33




Sorry about that...here is the correct link for DEITRICK, BRANDON SCOTT...

http://www.co.grays-harbor.wa.us/info/sheriff/JailRegisters/RegisterDetail.asp?SrchBookNo=171161

The one originally above is correct for:  DEITRICK, BRANDON SCOTT.

The new link you just gave is for:  DEITRICK, DARRON KEITH

--------------- I hate having multiple windows open - esp when the names are almost the same!


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3
Post by: love4ever on July 31, 2009, 10:45:20 PM
HUFF, BRANDY MARIE

Fail To Reg Sex/Kidnap Offendr


http://www.co.grays-harbor.wa.us/info/sheriff/JailRegisters/RegisterDetail.asp?SrchBookNo=172944


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3
Post by: love4ever on July 31, 2009, 10:47:59 PM
Thank you for the correction
A_News_Junkie_Monkey
~Love~

I need to finish my research paper...I will be back later!! ::MonkeyAngel::


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3
Post by: A_News_Junkie_Monkey on July 31, 2009, 10:48:41 PM
HUFF, BRANDY MARIE

Fail To Reg Sex/Kidnap Offendr


http://www.co.grays-harbor.wa.us/info/sheriff/JailRegisters/RegisterDetail.asp?SrchBookNo=172944

So many kidnapper and SO combo offenders in this area.   Her charges orginally:   Fail To Reg Sex/Kidnap Offendr
Gads.................


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3
Post by: A_News_Junkie_Monkey on July 31, 2009, 10:49:36 PM
Thank you for the correction
A_News_Junkie_Monkey
~Love~

I need to finish my research paper...I will be back later!! ::MonkeyAngel::

Hurry back and can I read your research paper - I love brain candy! LOL
Have a great night/


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3
Post by: love4ever on July 31, 2009, 10:50:08 PM
HUFF, BRANDY MARIE

Fail To Reg Sex/Kidnap Offendr


http://www.co.grays-harbor.wa.us/info/sheriff/JailRegisters/RegisterDetail.asp?SrchBookNo=172944

So many kidnapper and SO combo offenders in this area.   Her charges orginally:   Fail To Reg Sex/Kidnap Offendr
Gads.................

Yea scary!! ::MonkeyEek::


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3
Post by: Tamikosmom on July 31, 2009, 10:51:56 PM
The following two posts indicate that Josh Baum in unconcerned over the disappearance of his sister.  If there is lack of caring ... the same mindset could reveal a lack of remorse for lies and actions.

Janet

++++++

mamahead 13 hours ago wrote:
 
Lindsey has been afraid of her brother for a very long time.  He has threatned her many times.  Where is she? And why is the mother not crazy with sadness or emotion. Show us some tears. The friend that Lindsey was last with shows more emotion than the mother. And why was the brother begging for money for fireworks at his little sisters candlelight vigil?

http://www.king5.com/topstories/stories/NW_070609WAB-missing-mccleary-girl-SW.14c01624.html


KaraK
Re: Lindsey Baum, 10y missing from McCleary, WA 6/26/09
« Reply #1795 on: July 09, 2009, 03:13:01 AM »


I am no Dr and I never dug but he does take medication for some condition - more mental than physical. He is not what kids would call "cool" and strikes you as being younger than he actually is if you talk to him. He came over a few times and we'd talk about something and he'd start jabbering about something completely off topic - when we were all out looking for Lindsey I was trying to talk to him about where we'd already looked and he just wanted to know if my son could come over the next day. So I guess you could say unfocused.

http://scaredmonkeys.net/index.php?topic=5541.msg871046;topicseen#msg871046

Kara Kampen – Mother of Lindsey’s friend Michaela




Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3
Post by: love4ever on July 31, 2009, 10:53:58 PM
Thank you for the correction
A_News_Junkie_Monkey
~Love~

I need to finish my research paper...I will be back later!! ::MonkeyAngel::

Hurry back and can I read your research paper - I love brain candy! LOL
Have a great night/

I have about 50 research papers...I have done them anywhere from infant neglect to; does God exist....lol...which one would you like?...I also just finished a 10 page research paper on Morality ::MonkeyConfused::


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3
Post by: love4ever on July 31, 2009, 10:56:22 PM
The following two posts indicate that Josh Baum in unconcerned over the disappearance of his sister.  If there is lack of caring ... the same mindset could reveal a lack of remorse for lies and actions.

Janet

++++++

mamahead 13 hours ago wrote:
 
Lindsey has been afraid of her brother for a very long time.  He has threatned her many times.  Where is she? And why is the mother not crazy with sadness or emotion. Show us some tears. The friend that Lindsey was last with shows more emotion than the mother. And why was the brother begging for money for fireworks at his little sisters candlelight vigil?

http://www.king5.com/topstories/stories/NW_070609WAB-missing-mccleary-girl-SW.14c01624.html


KaraK
Re: Lindsey Baum, 10y missing from McCleary, WA 6/26/09
« Reply #1795 on: July 09, 2009, 03:13:01 AM »


I am no Dr and I never dug but he does take medication for some condition - more mental than physical. He is not what kids would call "cool" and strikes you as being younger than he actually is if you talk to him. He came over a few times and we'd talk about something and he'd start jabbering about something completely off topic - when we were all out looking for Lindsey I was trying to talk to him about where we'd already looked and he just wanted to know if my son could come over the next day. So I guess you could say unfocused.

http://scaredmonkeys.net/index.php?topic=5541.msg871046;topicseen#msg871046

Kara Kampen – Mother of Lindsey’s friend Michaela



It would be better if we knew Josh's middle name...

I willbe back I need to study..~Love~


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3
Post by: sunshine12 on July 31, 2009, 11:01:23 PM
The following two posts indicate that Josh Baum in unconcerned over the disappearance of his sister.  If there is lack of caring ... the same mindset could reveal a lack of remorse for lies and actions.

Janet

++++++

mamahead 13 hours ago wrote:
 
Lindsey has been afraid of her brother for a very long time.  He has threatned her many times.  Where is she? And why is the mother not crazy with sadness or emotion. Show us some tears. The friend that Lindsey was last with shows more emotion than the mother. And why was the brother begging for money for fireworks at his little sisters candlelight vigil?

http://www.king5.com/topstories/stories/NW_070609WAB-missing-mccleary-girl-SW.14c01624.html


KaraK
Re: Lindsey Baum, 10y missing from McCleary, WA 6/26/09
« Reply #1795 on: July 09, 2009, 03:13:01 AM »


I am no Dr and I never dug but he does take medication for some condition - more mental than physical. He is not what kids would call "cool" and strikes you as being younger than he actually is if you talk to him. He came over a few times and we'd talk about something and he'd start jabbering about something completely off topic - when we were all out looking for Lindsey I was trying to talk to him about where we'd already looked and he just wanted to know if my son could come over the next day. So I guess you could say unfocused.

http://scaredmonkeys.net/index.php?topic=5541.msg871046;topicseen#msg871046

Kara Kampen – Mother of Lindsey’s friend Michaela




if we take these 2 witness reports seriously then we are agreeing with the "local rumor mill"..it may be true, it may not be..i have to believe that the police have thoroughly talked to jb

the same questions remain...where would he have hidden her body? i would think the dogs would have tracked it.  i just don't know how practical it is that jb is involved.

in this day in age i just want to say that many children are medicated for "mental health/behavioral problems" that prob shouldn't be..so its very easy for one to put this label on  a child when really they are only going through a difficult time in their life (like the divorce of their parents for example)..  everyone also copes with things in different ways, so who's to say how jb should cope with the fact that his sister is missing?

i just really cant see him being involved


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3
Post by: Tamikosmom on July 31, 2009, 11:17:17 PM
sunshine12

Do you believe that Josh Baum should be given a free pass ... he should be disregarded as a person of interest by investigators in the process of elimination or ... should his actions and whereabouts after he was sent home by the family friend following the dispute with Lindsey and Michaela be investigated?

Janet


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3
Post by: Tamikosmom on July 31, 2009, 11:49:58 PM
Could the truth encompassing the implication that Josh Baum had was involved in any way with the Juvenile Detention System be confirmed or denied by any of our Monkey researchers.  If so ... what was the offence.  It could be that Josh's age may imply that info is not public record.

Thank

Janet

++++++++++

LINDSEY BAUM - IN HER OWN WORDS

Lindsey Baum:  Facebook Entry


TWILIGHT FREAK is happy that her brother is going to juvi tomorrow.Mood: happ at 14:10 17 Jun view more

Lindsey Baum is happy that her brother is going to juvie tomorrow.
Mood: Happ at 14:10 17 June

http://www.myspace.com/477760045


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3
Post by: JessStar on August 01, 2009, 12:01:57 AM
I know I'll probably catch some flak for this, but I personally think that chasing Josh would be a waste of precious, limited law enforcement resources. It's been quite some time since Lindsey went missing. I'm sure he's been vetted enough. There is no way on God's green earth that a 12 year old boy can pull off something like this-it's been way too quiet way too long. Remember, he's 12. No matter how hard we want to equate his state of mind with someone who is older, he has the mind, and therefore the mental capacity, of a 12 year old. He would have broken by now. There's no way he could stand up to the pressure. Just my opinion. Fire away...


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3
Post by: AZSunny on August 01, 2009, 12:12:17 AM
Could the truth encompassing the implication that Josh Baum had was involved in any way with the Juvenile Detention System be confirmed or denied by any of our Monkey researchers.  If so ... what was the offence.  It could be that Josh's age may imply that info is not public record.

Thank

Janet

++++++++++

LINDSEY BAUM - IN HER OWN WORDS

Lindsey Baum:  Facebook Entry


TWILIGHT FREAK is happy that her brother is going to juvi tomorrow.Mood: happ at 14:10 17 Jun view more

Lindsey Baum is happy that her brother is going to juvie tomorrow.
Mood: Happ at 14:10 17 June

http://www.myspace.com/477760045


Janet,  there was a link provided earlier, perhaps last week in the threads.  There was a juvenile hearing he attended, and he plead guilty.  Because he is a juvi, what the charge was for we do not know, but it stated a felony.  There was discussion that it was arson related.   

I really do not think he is involved in her disappearance, if he acted alone.  I do not think he could have assisted an adult and still be home for his 10PM curfew. I am pretty sure he was on the radar screen early on, and investigated pretty throughly.  JMO


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3
Post by: JessStar on August 01, 2009, 12:13:13 AM
As a quick follow-up to my last post, and hopefully to lend some credibility to it, I have cross examined children before. It was the most difficult thing I've ever done in my legal career-for no reason other than the fact that I was staring in the eyes of a child. Not fun. But I can tell you from experience, that it doesn't take much to know when a child is lying or hiding something. I don't care how seasoned he or she is. As Judge Judy would say, adults (especially those trained at it) are still smarter, more clever and astute than a child on his or her best day.


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3
Post by: AZSunny on August 01, 2009, 12:14:32 AM
I know I'll probably catch some flak for this, but I personally think that chasing Josh would be a waste of precious, limited law enforcement resources. It's been quite some time since Lindsey went missing. I'm sure he's been vetted enough. There is no way on God's green earth that a 12 year old boy can pull off something like this-it's been way too quiet way too long. Remember, he's 12. No matter how hard we want to equate his state of mind with someone who is older, he has the mind, and therefore the mental capacity, of a 12 year old. He would have broken by now. There's no way he could stand up to the pressure. Just my opinion. Fire away...

I agree Jess, but I would disagree that he has the mental capacity of a normal 12 year old.  There appears to be some emotional/mental issues at play that make his reasoning far younger than his years.


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3
Post by: Tamikosmom on August 01, 2009, 12:17:21 AM
No fire JessStar.

We will just have to respectfully agree to disagree.

1.  I believe that all residents in that two block strench should considered persons of interest and properties should be search.

2.  I believe that the argument between Josh and his sister that warranted intervention less than one hour prior to Lindsey being observed at 5th and Maple dictates that Josh should be considered a person of interest.

3.  Considering Wayne Watnee's connection to both Lindsey and Josh and ... the location of his residence in relation to the Baum residence dictates that this man should be considered a person of interest.

Janet

+++++++

Ockham's Razor

You must never fail to adopt the simplest idea as your working hypothesis. If necessity demands, you can dump it later when you have more data, but only because it is no longer the simplest idea" or "entities should not be multiplied beyond necessity



Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3
Post by: JessStar on August 01, 2009, 12:19:54 AM
You're right AZ. I should have said that his mental capacity can be no older than a 12 year old.


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3
Post by: JessStar on August 01, 2009, 12:23:24 AM
Personally, under OK-Razor, I'd "dump" the idea that Josh pulled this off because, based on current data, having him as the perp is no longer the simplest idea. The mere passage of time without finding Lindsey or without Josh breaking really lead me there.


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3
Post by: Tamikosmom on August 01, 2009, 12:51:28 AM
Could the truth encompassing the implication that Josh Baum had was involved in any way with the Juvenile Detention System be confirmed or denied by any of our Monkey researchers.  If so ... what was the offence.  It could be that Josh's age may imply that info is not public record.

Thank

Janet

++++++++++

LINDSEY BAUM - IN HER OWN WORDS

Lindsey Baum:  Facebook Entry


TWILIGHT FREAK is happy that her brother is going to juvi tomorrow.Mood: happ at 14:10 17 Jun view more

Lindsey Baum is happy that her brother is going to juvie tomorrow.
Mood: Happ at 14:10 17 June

http://www.myspace.com/477760045


Janet,  there was a link provided earlier, perhaps last week in the threads.  There was a juvenile hearing he attended, and he plead guilty.  Because he is a juvi, what the charge was for we do not know, but it stated a felony.  There was discussion that it was arson related.   

I really do not think he is involved in her disappearance, if he acted alone.  I do not think he could have assisted an adult and still be home for his 10PM curfew. I am pretty sure he was on the radar screen early on, and investigated pretty throughly.  JMO

Thanks AZSunny.

I obviously missed this revelation.   I would sure appreciate if a Monkey could provide me with the related link.

So we have no idea what the unrevealed felony charge was that Josh Baum pled guilty to but … it is speculated/rumored that the felony was arson related.  Some have made a choice to give this speculation/rumor credibility and … that is OK..

However … I speculate that the felony was related to the comments of mlachester.  Think about it.  This woman did not hide her identity.  She involved 911 and local LE in the scenario encompassing Lindsey and implicating Josh.  Why would mlachester lie while obviously aware that 911 and LE sources could easily refute her words if fabricated.

Janet

+++++

mlachester 1 day ago wrote:

... Its no big secret she had came to my house to call 911 when her brother had done things to her.

http://www.king5.com/topstories/stories/NW_063009WAB-Mccleary-girl-search-LJ.1fc0b759.html?ocp=2#slcgm_comments_anchor


mlachester 2 hours ago wrote:

I am close to her and I know a lot more than the media or law enforcement are saying right now. … Sorry if you don't like the truth but I have never been one to keep the truth in and she should of been taken the first time she called 911 from my house asking for help instead of put in a police car and taken back to her abuser!"

http://www.king5.com/topstories/stor...omments_anchor



.



Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3
Post by: Tamikosmom on August 01, 2009, 12:57:40 AM
Why was Lindsey so pleased at the prospects of her brother being taken away from the home.  My four grandchildren all have issues with one another ... typical sibling rivalry but ... if there was a threat that one was to be taken away ... the other three would be devastated.

Janet

++++++++

LINDSEY BAUM - IN HER OWN WORDS

Lindsey Baum:  Facebook Entry


TWILIGHT FREAK is happy that her brother is going to juvi tomorrow.Mood: happ at 14:10 17 Jun view more

Lindsey Baum is happy that her brother is going to juvie tomorrow.
Mood: Happ at 14:10 17 June

http://www.myspace.com/477760045


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3
Post by: Tamikosmom on August 01, 2009, 01:05:05 AM
Whatever the truth encompassing the disappearance of Lindsey Baum ... I pray that there will be a conclusion soon.

 ::MonkeyAngel::

Good Night Monkeys!  Good Night Zookeepers!

Janet


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3
Post by: doubledecker on August 01, 2009, 01:06:27 AM
Personally, under OK-Razor, I'd "dump" the idea that Josh pulled this off because, based on current data, having him as the perp is no longer the simplest idea. The mere passage of time without finding Lindsey or without Josh breaking really lead me there.

these are the very two things that don't work for me also.  I tried to have an open mind to see how it could be he did this, but because of these two things I just can't see how he did.  my personal opinion.  and like I said, if someone can explain these two things away I will reconsider my opinion.


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3
Post by: JessStar on August 01, 2009, 01:12:08 AM
Let's make a deal. If someone can get mlachester to provide the date(s) and approximate time(s)  of the alleged 911 call(s) and, perhaps the phone number from which the call was initiated, I will submit a request for the tapes. They're typically public record.


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3
Post by: JessStar on August 01, 2009, 01:36:13 AM
Good Night everyone. And Good Night Lindsey. We're all here for you, hoping to help bring you home safe and sound. You're in our thoughts and prayers.


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3
Post by: A_News_Junkie_Monkey on August 01, 2009, 01:42:04 AM
Thank you for the correction
A_News_Junkie_Monkey
~Love~

I need to finish my research paper...I will be back later!! ::MonkeyAngel::

Hurry back and can I read your research paper - I love brain candy! LOL
Have a great night/

I have about 50 research papers...I have done them anywhere from infant neglect to; does God exist....lol...which one would you like?...I also just finished a 10 page research paper on Morality ::MonkeyConfused::

Sorry for the OT (promise I won't do it again) but  ....... ALL OF THEM!   


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3
Post by: Nut44x4 on August 01, 2009, 07:16:07 AM
does anyone have any idea what it costs to hire a sketch artist?  a good one? 

I looked it up .....  ::MonkeyCool::
$15-50 an hour plus mileage

http://wiki.answers.com/Q/How_much_does_a_police_sketch_artist_make_a_year


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3
Post by: Nut44x4 on August 01, 2009, 07:21:39 AM
This is probably old news........

GRAYS HARBOR COUNTY: Reward increases in missing girl case
THE OLYMPIAN | • Published August 01, 2009

The reward for information leading to 11-year-old Lindsey Baum has been raised to $10,000 as investigators continue checking on new leads, according to The Daily World of Aberdeen.

Lindsey’s mother, Melissa, said donations have contributed to the increase in the reward previously offered by Crime Stoppers and the National Center for Missing and Exploited Children.

Lindsey disappeared June 26 while walking a few blocks to her home in McCleary.

Anyone with information about her whereabouts is asked to call 866-915-8299 or send an e-mail to soadmin@co.grays-harbor.wa.us.

http://www.theolympian.com/southsound/story/927389.html


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3
Post by: Tamikosmom on August 01, 2009, 11:19:01 AM
Police chase leads on missing McCleary girl
Updated: 07/30/09   1:42 am
 
Searchers returned to the streets of McCleary under a brutal sun Tuesday to follow up on new leads in the hunt for 11-year-old Lindsey Baum, according to The Daily World of Aberdeen.

About 25 officers and searchers with dogs braved near-record temperatures to re-canvass areas of town, Grays Harbor Undersheriff Rick Scott said.

A recent $6,000 reward for information in the missing girl’s case has produced a new wave of tips, Scott said. Surrounding law enforcement agencies including the Thurston County Sheriff’s Office and the Aberdeen Police Department sent officers to help perform follow-up searches and interviews.

About six core investigators have been leading the effort to find Lindsey, who disappeared while walking a few blocks home June 26. The detectives have found no evidence explaining the 4-foot-9, brown-haired girl’s disappearance, but they continue sorting through thousands of tips.

Officers and volunteers knocked on doors throughout town Tuesday, asking new questions and trying to reach people missed in previous interviews, Scott said.

Two teams with cadaver search dogs also roamed the town, he said, but the hot conditions limited the available scents and quickly wore out the dogs.


Scott said detectives and extra officers expect to follow up on new tips in town for at least the rest of the week. He asked anyone with any potentially helpful information to call 866-915-8299.

http://www.thenewstribune.com/news/northwest/story/827963.html


One month too late.

 ::MonkeyNoNo::


BUMPED


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3
Post by: doubledecker on August 01, 2009, 11:37:15 AM
Let's make a deal. If someone can get mlachester to provide the date(s) and approximate time(s)  of the alleged 911 call(s) and, perhaps the phone number from which the call was initiated, I will submit a request for the tapes. They're typically public record.

I have already asked someone to ask her about the reports.  hopefully, she will tell them that info. I update and ask specifically for that info. 


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3
Post by: KarmaRoundUp on August 01, 2009, 11:39:09 AM
Again ... it would be interesting to know what time Josh Baum got home on the evening of June 26, 2009.  Did he go home as the neighbour who intervened in the argument had instructed?  If he was at home with Mom prior to Lindsey's leaving the Kampen resident between 9:15 PM and 9:30 PM then this wannabe detective's speculation will go in another direction.

Janet


Do we know when the mother got home, or if she was home the entire time? 

 ::MonkeyShocked::

AZSunny ... according to Sheriff Scott ... Melissa Baum passed a polygraph.  I would assume this would rule Lindsey's mom out as committing wrongdoing or having knowledge of wrongdoing.

Janet

+++++


Grays Harbor County Undersheriff Rick Scott

KOMO News – July 2, 2009

The missing girl's mother, who wanted avoid becoming the center of the investigation, voluntarily took a polygraph test. The father of the girl's best friend, Scott Williams, also volunteered to take the test.

"At their requests polygraphs were given to them. They passed those polygraphs. We're comfortable with the information they've shared with us and comfortable with the timeline they've explained," said Grays Harbor County Undersheriff Rick Scott.

http://www.komonews.com/news/49651607.html



Speaking of taking polygraphs,does anyone know who the guy is that is with Melissa Baum when she took her poly?


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3
Post by: doubledecker on August 01, 2009, 11:39:53 AM
does anyone have any idea what it costs to hire a sketch artist?  a good one? 

I looked it up .....  ::MonkeyCool::
$15-50 an hour plus mileage

http://wiki.answers.com/Q/How_much_does_a_police_sketch_artist_make_a_year


thank you very much.  now I need a list of ones in pierce county.  I'll try to find them still but if someone can help find them, would greatly appreciate help.



Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3
Post by: doubledecker on August 01, 2009, 11:42:20 AM
Again ... it would be interesting to know what time Josh Baum got home on the evening of June 26, 2009.  Did he go home as the neighbour who intervened in the argument had instructed?  If he was at home with Mom prior to Lindsey's leaving the Kampen resident between 9:15 PM and 9:30 PM then this wannabe detective's speculation will go in another direction.

Janet


Do we know when the mother got home, or if she was home the entire time? 

 ::MonkeyShocked::

AZSunny ... according to Sheriff Scott ... Melissa Baum passed a polygraph.  I would assume this would rule Lindsey's mom out as committing wrongdoing or having knowledge of wrongdoing.

Janet

+++++


Grays Harbor County Undersheriff Rick Scott

KOMO News – July 2, 2009

The missing girl's mother, who wanted avoid becoming the center of the investigation, voluntarily took a polygraph test. The father of the girl's best friend, Scott Williams, also volunteered to take the test.

"At their requests polygraphs were given to them. They passed those polygraphs. We're comfortable with the information they've shared with us and comfortable with the timeline they've explained," said Grays Harbor County Undersheriff Rick Scott.

http://www.komonews.com/news/49651607.html



Speaking of taking polygraphs,does anyone know who the guy is that is with Melissa Baum when she took her poly?

hhhhmmmm, what guy?  I missed the guy I guess?  you mean scott williams? or some other guy?  scott is kk's bf


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3
Post by: KarmaRoundUp on August 01, 2009, 11:44:26 AM
Does anyone this the guy in this guy(touching the Lindsey poster)looks like the guy below?Could they be the same guy?(guy on the left in the group pic)





Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3
Post by: KarmaRoundUp on August 01, 2009, 11:47:32 AM
hello monkeys ::MonkeyDance::
the person sent josh home knew that lindsey will go back home alone.
Hi Cecilita, now that's interesting, I sure wish we knew who this person was, I think it was a woman.
I don't think this person who sent Josh home could have known what the plans were for staying the night.Originally Lindsey wanted Kayla to stay at her house that night then the girls changed their minds and wanted Lindsey to stay at Kayla's because the next night they wanted Kayla to stay at Lindsey's.      ::MonkeyConfused::


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3
Post by: KarmaRoundUp on August 01, 2009, 11:54:44 AM
Or does the guy in the Lindsey poster pic look like this guy?Could they be the same guy?(man on the right in 1st pic,tall man with hat + brown coat in 2nd pic)






Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3
Post by: doubledecker on August 01, 2009, 12:14:42 PM
Or does the guy in the Lindsey poster pic look like this guy?Could they be the same guy?(man on the right in 1st pic,tall man with hat + brown coat in 2nd pic)






my personally opinion on this guy is, the arms are too hairy and his ears too big??? 


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3
Post by: doubledecker on August 01, 2009, 12:20:41 PM
Does anyone this the guy in this guy(touching the Lindsey poster)looks like the guy below?Could they be the same guy?(guy on the left in the group pic)





(http://i708.photobucket.com/albums/ww90/doubledeck/lindsey%20baum%20case/baumposterguy1.jpg)(http://i708.photobucket.com/albums/ww90/doubledeck/lindsey%20baum%20case/baumwatnefriend1.jpg)


hmmm, don't know


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3
Post by: MuffyBee on August 01, 2009, 12:32:47 PM
The guy above has higher check bones and a longer chin then the guy in the lower pic IMO


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3
Post by: MuffyBee on August 01, 2009, 12:33:50 PM
Notice too, the difference in the ears.  Again, jmo


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3
Post by: KarmaRoundUp on August 01, 2009, 12:42:51 PM
Again ... it would be interesting to know what time Josh Baum got home on the evening of June 26, 2009.  Did he go home as the neighbour who intervened in the argument had instructed?  If he was at home with Mom prior to Lindsey's leaving the Kampen resident between 9:15 PM and 9:30 PM then this wannabe detective's speculation will go in another direction.

Janet


Do we know when the mother got home, or if she was home the entire time? 

 ::MonkeyShocked::

AZSunny ... according to Sheriff Scott ... Melissa Baum passed a polygraph.  I would assume this would rule Lindsey's mom out as committing wrongdoing or having knowledge of wrongdoing.

Janet

+++++


Grays Harbor County Undersheriff Rick Scott

KOMO News – July 2, 2009

The missing girl's mother, who wanted avoid becoming the center of the investigation, voluntarily took a polygraph test. The father of the girl's best friend, Scott Williams, also volunteered to take the test.

"At their requests polygraphs were given to them. They passed those polygraphs. We're comfortable with the information they've shared with us and comfortable with the timeline they've explained," said Grays Harbor County Undersheriff Rick Scott.

http://www.komonews.com/news/49651607.html



Speaking of taking polygraphs,does anyone know who the guy is that is with Melissa Baum when she took her poly?

hhhhmmmm, what guy?  I missed the guy I guess?  you mean scott williams? or some other guy?  scott is kk's bf
The guy with Melissa was pictured in the video of Melissa going into the police station for her poly.He was right with her and it wasn't her ex hubby or Scott Williams.He is kinda tall and med/slim built,maybe about the same age as Melissa.I'll try to find a image of him.


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3
Post by: KarmaRoundUp on August 01, 2009, 12:47:59 PM
The guy above has higher check bones and a longer chin then the guy in the lower pic IMO
Yes,I see that with the close up shot(thank you DD!)
Also,nose looks bigger in the tall pic.


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3
Post by: Heidismom on August 01, 2009, 12:57:50 PM
Janet,
This is the first time I have posted, don't know if I am doing it right.
 But regarding Josh, he had a problem at school this spring, in which the classroom was evacuated, this is public knowledge, told to me by a reliable classmate.  Maybe this had something to do with his juvi thing, I don't know. If the court appearance was due to his mistreating his sister,  I wouldn't think he would be trusted to be the one that was supposed to walk her home. 


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3
Post by: KarmaRoundUp on August 01, 2009, 01:07:09 PM
OLYMPIA -- The sheriffs of Grays Harbor and Thurston Counties say they'll ask Washington senators Patty Murray, Maria Cantwell, and any House Representatives who will listen to fight for federal COPS money.

The two counties were among 22 Washington counties that applied for federal help to hire deputies. Although many Washington cities got money, the 22 counties got nothing.

Grays Harbor County Sheriff Mike Whelan said he was optimistic he would receive federal stimulus money. Lumber is not exactly the hottest commodity around, the county has budget problems, and they thought for sure their 13.9% unemployment would get them the money.

"When you take a look at the criteria they used, Grays Harbor County was scored out at 97 percent," Whelan said.

Now 97 percent will get you an A+ in college, but on the federal report card, it gets you zero dollars.

Whelan worries about the cost of the unexpected -- for instance the cost of the search for Lindsey Baum, the 11-year-old girl who disappeared while walking home from a friend's home.

Add that to the prospect of more budget cuts, and the lack of federal money could mean troubles ahead.

"When you lay off deputies the crime rate goes up," Whelan said.

Ironically, a higher crime rate might be what they need to the money. Thurston County Sheriff Dan Kimball showed off a plaque he got from an insurance company congratulating him for a low crime rate. But Thurston County failed to qualify for the money because of a low crime rate.

"One of the things we hear is 'your crime rate is not high enough,' " Kimball said. "And it does seem like a kick in the rear end when they say your crime rate's not high enough, therefore we are not going to help you keep that crime rate from going up."

Kimball says he understands crime may be a big problem in bigger cities. But he says the feds need to understand the needs of counties to keep more rural areas safe and if more money comes available in 2010, the counties need a share of the pie.
http://www.komonews.com/news/52227642.html


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3
Post by: no rose colored glasses on August 01, 2009, 01:07:26 PM
Janet,
This is the first time I have posted, don't know if I am doing it right.
 But regarding Josh, he had a problem at school this spring, in which the classroom was evacuated, this is public knowledge, told to me by a reliable classmate.  Maybe this had something to do with his juvi thing, I don't know. If the court appearance was due to his mistreating his sister,  I wouldn't think he would be trusted to be the one that was supposed to walk her home. 
WELCOME, that is very interesting, wonder what he did that a classroom was evacuated  ::MonkeyEek::


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3
Post by: KarmaRoundUp on August 01, 2009, 01:09:57 PM
Janet,
This is the first time I have posted, don't know if I am doing it right.
 But regarding Josh, he had a problem at school this spring, in which the classroom was evacuated, this is public knowledge, told to me by a reliable classmate.  Maybe this had something to do with his juvi thing, I don't know. If the court appearance was due to his mistreating his sister,  I wouldn't think he would be trusted to be the one that was supposed to walk her home. 
Welcome to SM's HeidisMom
Thank you for the info.I'm thinking the classroom had to be evacuated because of fire right?


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3
Post by: AZSunny on August 01, 2009, 01:14:40 PM
Janet,
This is the first time I have posted, don't know if I am doing it right.
 But regarding Josh, he had a problem at school this spring, in which the classroom was evacuated, this is public knowledge, told to me by a reliable classmate.  Maybe this had something to do with his juvi thing, I don't know. If the court appearance was due to his mistreating his sister,  I wouldn't think he would be trusted to be the one that was supposed to walk her home. 

Thanks Heidismom for the information, and WELCOME!!  You posted perfectly!


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3
Post by: Tamikosmom on August 01, 2009, 01:15:35 PM
Janet,
This is the first time I have posted, don't know if I am doing it right.
 But regarding Josh, he had a problem at school this spring, in which the classroom was evacuated, this is public knowledge, told to me by a reliable classmate.  Maybe this had something to do with his juvi thing, I don't know. If the court appearance was due to his mistreating his sister,  I wouldn't think he would be trusted to be the one that was supposed to walk her home. 

The point is ... we are all speculating.  Nobody knows for certain what was the felony that Josh Baum pleaded guilty to.  Nevertheless ... it does appear that this young man has his share of issues.

To tell the truth ... my focus in the disappearance of Lindsey Baum ... a focus that dictates that all avenues that lead back to this little girl on that walk home along Maple should be investigated.

Heidismom ... Welcome to Scared Monkeys.  I hope you continue posting.  This is a great site.  Lots of topics.

Janet



Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3
Post by: doubledecker on August 01, 2009, 01:22:55 PM
I don't want to clutter up the thread or board with more of my "craziness" so I'll just post a link.  For any of you who believe in dreams or other spiritual or psychic info. 

http://truecrime.forums-free.com/asas-the-koran-backpack-description-t265.html


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3
Post by: no rose colored glasses on August 01, 2009, 01:29:52 PM
I don't want to clutter up the thread or board with more of my "craziness" so I'll just post a link.  For any of you who believe in dreams or other spiritual or psychic info. 

http://truecrime.forums-free.com/asas-the-koran-backpack-description-t265.html
  ::MonkeyEek::  That is very interesting, and yes I believe in dreams, spiritual and psychic info, I'm open to all kinds of things. I will then sort through what makes sense and what doesn't.


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3
Post by: KarmaRoundUp on August 01, 2009, 01:31:02 PM
DD,I'm sorry,I can't find the video that shows Melissa walking into the police station to take her poly....with that guy walking with her.It sure seemed he was with her specifically though and I wondered who he was.


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3
Post by: doubledecker on August 01, 2009, 01:32:54 PM
I don't want to clutter up the thread or board with more of my "craziness" so I'll just post a link.  For any of you who believe in dreams or other spiritual or psychic info. 

http://truecrime.forums-free.com/asas-the-koran-backpack-description-t265.html
  ::MonkeyEek::  That is very interesting, and yes I believe in dreams, spiritual and psychic info, I'm open to all kinds of things. I will then sort through what makes sense and what doesn't.

I normally would not say anything on here, but maybe one of the locals might recognize the guy or the old piece of building.  Other than that I don't wish to discuss this stuff on here, but I will discuss it on the links there.  Out of respect of this board, so no one thinks the board has gone bonkers LOL


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3
Post by: doubledecker on August 01, 2009, 01:34:48 PM
DD,I'm sorry,I can't find the video that shows Melissa walking into the police station to take her poly....with that guy walking with her.It sure seemed he was with her specifically though and I wondered who he was.

let me look in my stuff, I try to save all the articles and video links. 

I did get behind is saving them in this case though, but the ones I do have anyone is welcome to use them etc they are here
http://truecrime.forums-free.com/lindsey-baum-news-articles-media-f45.html

the ones with the little white thing in front are the videos, the others are all articles.


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3
Post by: no rose colored glasses on August 01, 2009, 01:35:23 PM
I don't want to clutter up the thread or board with more of my "craziness" so I'll just post a link.  For any of you who believe in dreams or other spiritual or psychic info. 

http://truecrime.forums-free.com/asas-the-koran-backpack-description-t265.html
  ::MonkeyEek::  That is very interesting, and yes I believe in dreams, spiritual and psychic info, I'm open to all kinds of things. I will then sort through what makes sense and what doesn't.

I normally would not say anything on here, but maybe one of the locals might recognize the guy or the old piece of building.  Other than that I don't wish to discuss this stuff on here, but I will discuss it on the links there.  Out of respect of this board, so no one thinks the board has gone bonkers LOL
That's a good idea, but at the same time I would doubt if anyone would think the board has gone bonkers  ::MonkeyEek::  Very interesting forum that you have linked, thanks.


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3
Post by: Heidismom on August 01, 2009, 01:40:47 PM
Janet,
This is the first time I have posted, don't know if I am doing it right.
 But regarding Josh, he had a problem at school this spring, in which the classroom was evacuated, this is public knowledge, told to me by a reliable classmate.  Maybe this had something to do with his juvi thing, I don't know. If the court appearance was due to his mistreating his sister,  I wouldn't think he would be trusted to be the one that was supposed to walk her home. 
Welcome to SM's HeidisMom
Thank you for the info.I'm thinking the classroom had to be evacuated because of fire right?


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3
Post by: AZSunny on August 01, 2009, 01:40:51 PM
I don't want to clutter up the thread or board with more of my "craziness" so I'll just post a link.  For any of you who believe in dreams or other spiritual or psychic info. 

http://truecrime.forums-free.com/asas-the-koran-backpack-description-t265.html

Very interesting. 

When I was in my mid 20's I had a very vivid dream regarding my grandparents home burning down. I lived in Washington State and they were in Florida.   They owned a boarding house. The dream  was so real I called them to see if they were OK. They laughed and said they were fine, but thanks for being concerned.  I asked them to check everything, because the dream was very real and very vivid. 

10 days later my Aunt called me, and their home had been totally destroyed in a fire.  They got out safely, thankfully, but my family told me not to tell them about any more dreams.  LOL


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3
Post by: Heidismom on August 01, 2009, 01:45:22 PM
Fire was not mentioned to me by his classmate.   (I don't know how reply to a specific post)


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3
Post by: AZSunny on August 01, 2009, 01:48:46 PM
Fire was not mentioned to me by his classmate.   (I don't know how reply to a specific post)
[/b][/color]

Heidi, you can hit the quote button to the right of the post.  the quote will appear in your reply box.  Scroll all the way down past the  comments to the last quote marks (as highlighted above) add a space and then post your comments. 


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3
Post by: AZSunny on August 01, 2009, 01:49:48 PM
well the quote box didn't highlight...but it says [/quote] we will see if this works.


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3
Post by: AZSunny on August 01, 2009, 01:54:17 PM
DD...for what it is worth...


Acronym Definition
ASAS All Source Analysis System
ASAS Australian Special Air Service
ASAS American Society of Animal Science
ASAS American Society of Animal Science (Savoy, IL)
ASAS Airborne Separation Assurance System
ASAS All Saints Anglican School (Gold Coast, Australia)
ASAS Advanced Solid Axial Stage
ASAS Advanced Solid-state Array Spectrometer
ASAS Actor/Scriptor Animation System
ASAS American Society of Abdominal Surgeons
ASAS Another Side, Another Story (video game Kingdom Hearts)
ASAS Academic Standards and Assessment System
ASAS Alberta Secure Access Service (Canada)
ASAS Aerodynamic Stability Augmentation System
ASAS Addiction & Substance Abuse Specialists
ASAS Association of Southeast Asian Students
ASAS Airborne Student Accountability System
ASAS Argininosuccinic Acid Synthase Deficiency
ASAS Aviation Safety Analysis Subsystem
ASAS Automated Single Audio System (SA-2112/USQ)
ASAS Atkins Stress Analysis System


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3
Post by: doubledecker on August 01, 2009, 01:55:05 PM
I don't want to clutter up the thread or board with more of my "craziness" so I'll just post a link.  For any of you who believe in dreams or other spiritual or psychic info. 

http://truecrime.forums-free.com/asas-the-koran-backpack-description-t265.html
  ::MonkeyEek::  That is very interesting, and yes I believe in dreams, spiritual and psychic info, I'm open to all kinds of things. I will then sort through what makes sense and what doesn't.

I normally would not say anything on here, but maybe one of the locals might recognize the guy or the old piece of building.  Other than that I don't wish to discuss this stuff on here, but I will discuss it on the links there.  Out of respect of this board, so no one thinks the board has gone bonkers LOL
That's a good idea, but at the same time I would doubt if anyone would think the board has gone bonkers  ::MonkeyEek::  Very interesting forum that you have linked, thanks.

that is MY research board, that is where I get things in categories so I can find it LOL
I'm skye over there.  feel free to use anything there, over here.  I don't mind


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3
Post by: KarmaRoundUp on August 01, 2009, 02:03:03 PM
Found it finally
Melissa walking into the police station,right at the 1:26 mark.I don't know how to get the image off of the video.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5GTulbXxRCk




Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3
Post by: no rose colored glasses on August 01, 2009, 02:09:35 PM
Thanks DD.


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3
Post by: AZSunny on August 01, 2009, 02:14:21 PM
Found it finally
Melissa walking into the police station,right at the 1:26 mark.I don't know how to get the image off of the video.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5GTulbXxRCk




Karma,  he resembles Lindsey's father to me.


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3
Post by: doubledecker on August 01, 2009, 02:14:40 PM
Found it finally
Melissa walking into the police station,right at the 1:26 mark.I don't know how to get the image off of the video.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5GTulbXxRCk




not too great of photo but here he is

(http://i708.photobucket.com/albums/ww90/doubledeck/lindsey%20baum%20case/baummomnguy1.jpg)


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3
Post by: doubledecker on August 01, 2009, 02:19:54 PM
Lindsey's Father

(http://i708.photobucket.com/albums/ww90/doubledeck/lindsey%20baum%20case/baum-dad-1.jpg)


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3
Post by: Tamikosmom on August 01, 2009, 02:39:12 PM
Maybe the LE are attempting to connect the dots in regards to "what info is known" in the latest search.

Janet

+++++++

Expert: Missing girl likely went with someone she knew
09:58 PM PDT on Wednesday, July 1, 2009


A national expert helping in the search for 10-year-old Lindsey Baum says someone Lindsey knew might be responsible for her disappearance. Baum vanished while walking home from a friend’s house Friday around 9 p.m.

"Based on the information I have, it’s someone she possibly knows or is in the area, not outside the area," said Henry Schmidt, with the National Center for Missing and Exploited Children.

Schmidt, a retired sheriff from Wyoming, arrived in McCleary to assist with the search Sunday.

http://www.nwcn.com/statenews/washington/stories/NW_070109WAB-mccleary-KS.260ea8b9.html


Police chase leads on missing McCleary girl
Updated: 07/30/09


Officers and volunteers knocked on doors throughout town Tuesday, asking new questions and trying to reach people missed in previous interviews, Scott said.
 
Two teams with cadaver search dogs also roamed the town, he said, but the hot conditions limited the available scents and quickly wore out the dogs.

http://www.thenewstribune.com/news/northwest/story/827963.html



Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3
Post by: doubledecker on August 01, 2009, 02:39:36 PM
you can see lindsey's dad's sunglasses here

(http://i708.photobucket.com/albums/ww90/doubledeck/lindsey%20baum%20case/baum-dadglasses1.jpg)

is this guy wearing the same sunglasses?

(http://i708.photobucket.com/albums/ww90/doubledeck/lindsey%20baum%20case/baum-mom-guy4.jpg)





Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3
Post by: doubledecker on August 01, 2009, 02:42:16 PM
more of the guy with lindsey's mom

(http://i708.photobucket.com/albums/ww90/doubledeck/lindsey%20baum%20case/baum-mom-guy-3.jpg)

(http://i708.photobucket.com/albums/ww90/doubledeck/lindsey%20baum%20case/baum-mom-guy5.jpg)

(http://i708.photobucket.com/albums/ww90/doubledeck/lindsey%20baum%20case/baum-mom-guy2.jpg)





Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3
Post by: Tamikosmom on August 01, 2009, 02:58:32 PM
Found it finally
Melissa walking into the police station,right at the 1:26 mark.I don't know how to get the image off of the video.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5GTulbXxRCk


Karma,  he resembles Lindsey's father to me.

AZSunny ... I do not think it is Lindsey's father who accompanied Melissa Baum to the polygraph..

When the following two articles are taken into consideration ... Scott Baum did not arrive in McCleary until July 4th or 5th.  Sheriff Scott claimed on July 2nd that Melissa Barum had taken a polygraph.

Janet

++++++++++

KOMO News – July 2, 2009

The missing girl's mother, who wanted avoid becoming the center of the investigation, voluntarily took a polygraph test. The father of the girl's best friend, Scott Williams, also volunteered to take the test.

"At their requests polygraphs were given to them. They passed those polygraphs. We're comfortable with the information they've shared with us and comfortable with the timeline they've explained," said Grays Harbor County Undersheriff Rick Scott.

http://www.komonews.com/news/49651607.html


KOMO News – Monday, July 6, 2009

Baum, who lives in Tennessee, arrived in McCleary over the weekend with his heart in a knot. The father said he had to get clearance from his military superiors before making the trip.

Baum hadn't seen his daughter, Lindsey Baum, in a year. He and her mother divorced three years ago. He stayed in Tennessee and his ex-wife moved to Washington with their daughter.

http://www.komonews.com/news/local/50075052.html




 




Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3
Post by: AZSunny on August 01, 2009, 03:04:14 PM
Found it finally
Melissa walking into the police station,right at the 1:26 mark.I don't know how to get the image off of the video.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5GTulbXxRCk


Karma,  he resembles Lindsey's father to me.

AZSunny ... I do not think it is Lindsey's father who accompanied Melissa Baum to the polygraph..

When the following two articles are taken into consideration ... Scott Baum did not arrive in McCleary until July 4th or 5th.  Sheriff Scott claimed on July 2nd that Melissa Barum had taken a polygraph.

Janet

++++++++++

KOMO News – July 2, 2009

The missing girl's mother, who wanted avoid becoming the center of the investigation, voluntarily took a polygraph test. The father of the girl's best friend, Scott Williams, also volunteered to take the test.

"At their requests polygraphs were given to them. They passed those polygraphs. We're comfortable with the information they've shared with us and comfortable with the timeline they've explained," said Grays Harbor County Undersheriff Rick Scott.

http://www.komonews.com/news/49651607.html


KOMO News – Monday, July 6, 2009

Baum, who lives in Tennessee, arrived in McCleary over the weekend with his heart in a knot. The father said he had to get clearance from his military superiors before making the trip.

Baum hadn't seen his daughter, Lindsey Baum, in a year. He and her mother divorced three years ago. He stayed in Tennessee and his ex-wife moved to Washington with their daughter.

http://www.komonews.com/news/local/50075052.html




 




Good catch on the dates.  Perhaps the video was taken another day.  The video is shown on TV on July 8th.  Two days after he arrived.   That is 6 days after the polygraph if it were taken on the 1st or 2nd.  I do think that is her father.  I think they were just going to talk to the police. 


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3
Post by: Tracygirl on August 01, 2009, 03:06:09 PM
Hello everyone,
I am so far behind I will never catch up. From these last posts I can gather Lindsey has not been found yet  ::MonkeyWaa::
I will try to figure out the happenings but but if someone cares to give a quick update, it would be appreciated.

BTW, FIL's burial went well. We got back into town a day or so ago.


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3
Post by: Tamikosmom on August 01, 2009, 03:08:10 PM


Good catch on the dates.  Perhaps the video was taken another day.  The video is shown on TV on July 8th.  Two days after he arrived.   That is 6 days after the polygraph if it were taken on the 1st or 2nd.  I do think that is her father.  I think they were just going to talk to the police.

[/quote]

Thank makes sense.

AZSunny ... thinking of you and your family.

 ::MonkeyAngel::

Janet


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3
Post by: Tamikosmom on August 01, 2009, 03:11:36 PM

Good catch on the dates.  Perhaps the video was taken another day.  The video is shown on TV on July 8th.  Two days after he arrived.   That is 6 days after the polygraph if it were taken on the 1st or 2nd.  I do think that is her father.  I think they were just going to talk to the police. 

That makes sense.

AZSunny ... thinking of you and your family.

 ::MonkeyAngel::

Janet


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3
Post by: KarmaRoundUp on August 01, 2009, 03:17:09 PM
Found it finally
Melissa walking into the police station,right at the 1:26 mark.I don't know how to get the image off of the video.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5GTulbXxRCk




Karma,  he resembles Lindsey's father to me.
Kinda but Scott has more grey in his face hair and head hair and Scott's face is rounder and he looks stockier to me.


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3
Post by: KarmaRoundUp on August 01, 2009, 03:18:58 PM
Found it finally
Melissa walking into the police station,right at the 1:26 mark.I don't know how to get the image off of the video.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5GTulbXxRCk




not too great of photo but here he is

(http://i708.photobucket.com/albums/ww90/doubledeck/lindsey%20baum%20case/baummomnguy1.jpg)
Thanks DD!
So what do you think?Ever see him before?Are they really walking in together?     ::MonkeyConfused::


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3
Post by: KarmaRoundUp on August 01, 2009, 03:23:39 PM
more of the guy with lindsey's mom

(http://i708.photobucket.com/albums/ww90/doubledeck/lindsey%20baum%20case/baum-mom-guy-3.jpg)

(http://i708.photobucket.com/albums/ww90/doubledeck/lindsey%20baum%20case/baum-mom-guy5.jpg)

(http://i708.photobucket.com/albums/ww90/doubledeck/lindsey%20baum%20case/baum-mom-guy2.jpg)




That doesn't look like Scott to me.This guy is not wearing sunglasses and I think Scott didn't get into town until after Melissa took her poly.


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3
Post by: KarmaRoundUp on August 01, 2009, 03:24:53 PM
Found it finally
Melissa walking into the police station,right at the 1:26 mark.I don't know how to get the image off of the video.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5GTulbXxRCk


Karma,  he resembles Lindsey's father to me.

AZSunny ... I do not think it is Lindsey's father who accompanied Melissa Baum to the polygraph..

When the following two articles are taken into consideration ... Scott Baum did not arrive in McCleary until July 4th or 5th.  Sheriff Scott claimed on July 2nd that Melissa Barum had taken a polygraph.

Janet

++++++++++

KOMO News – July 2, 2009

The missing girl's mother, who wanted avoid becoming the center of the investigation, voluntarily took a polygraph test. The father of the girl's best friend, Scott Williams, also volunteered to take the test.

"At their requests polygraphs were given to them. They passed those polygraphs. We're comfortable with the information they've shared with us and comfortable with the timeline they've explained," said Grays Harbor County Undersheriff Rick Scott.

http://www.komonews.com/news/49651607.html


KOMO News – Monday, July 6, 2009

Baum, who lives in Tennessee, arrived in McCleary over the weekend with his heart in a knot. The father said he had to get clearance from his military superiors before making the trip.

Baum hadn't seen his daughter, Lindsey Baum, in a year. He and her mother divorced three years ago. He stayed in Tennessee and his ex-wife moved to Washington with their daughter.

http://www.komonews.com/news/local/50075052.html




 



Thank you Janet
I should have read ahead before replying.     ::MonkeyWink::


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3
Post by: KarmaRoundUp on August 01, 2009, 03:31:20 PM
Thank you DD for the images.


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3
Post by: MuffyBee on August 01, 2009, 03:44:38 PM
Thank you DD for the images.

Ditto.  Thanks for the images, DD.

Hello Tams  :2waver:


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3
Post by: doubledecker on August 01, 2009, 04:29:36 PM
did anyone here follow the kylie ellis case?  if so ONE QUICK question please... do you believe she committed suicide,

and one quick statement

she was found less that 8 miles from the ft lewis area where they lady said she saw lindsey with Adam Campbell and another man. 

I did not follow the case, know nothing about it, but intend on researching it to see if any connections, however, just wanted opinion of anyone who followed the case to see if anyone thinks she really committed suicide or not. 

thanks


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3
Post by: MuffyBee on August 01, 2009, 04:35:26 PM
did anyone here follow the kylie ellis case?  if so ONE QUICK question please... do you believe she committed suicide,

and one quick statement

she was found less that 8 miles from the ft lewis area where they lady said she saw lindsey with Adam Campbell and another man. 

I did not follow the case, know nothing about it, but intend on researching it to see if any connections, however, just wanted opinion of anyone who followed the case to see if anyone thinks she really committed suicide or not. 

thanks

This is what I found here at SM:

http://scaredmonkeys.net/index.php?topic=4583.msg830214#msg830214

We don't have a thread for her, but here is comment.


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3
Post by: concernedmommyinwa on August 01, 2009, 04:39:44 PM
did anyone here follow the kylie ellis case?  if so ONE QUICK question please... do you believe she committed suicide,

and one quick statement

she was found less that 8 miles from the ft lewis area where they lady said she saw lindsey with Adam Campbell and another man. 

I did not follow the case, know nothing about it, but intend on researching it to see if any connections, however, just wanted opinion of anyone who followed the case to see if anyone thinks she really committed suicide or not. 

thanks

DD, I knew Kylie. She was a handful, had been driving her parents nuts with the crap she was doing, but nobody thought she was suicidal. She was a dramatic girl, full of emotion, but full of life. Her father doesn't think even the police think it was suicide.


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3
Post by: doubledecker on August 01, 2009, 05:44:31 PM
did anyone here follow the kylie ellis case?  if so ONE QUICK question please... do you believe she committed suicide,

and one quick statement

she was found less that 8 miles from the ft lewis area where they lady said she saw lindsey with Adam Campbell and another man. 

I did not follow the case, know nothing about it, but intend on researching it to see if any connections, however, just wanted opinion of anyone who followed the case to see if anyone thinks she really committed suicide or not. 

thanks

DD, I knew Kylie. She was a handful, had been driving her parents nuts with the crap she was doing, but nobody thought she was suicidal. She was a dramatic girl, full of emotion, but full of life. Her father doesn't think even the police think it was suicide.

thank you very much.  I am very glad to hear this about no one thinking she committed suicide.  I am going to research her case as though it were an unsolved murder. 


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3
Post by: Tamikosmom on August 01, 2009, 07:36:39 PM
The flushing of the water and treatment systems could have masked the initial strench of body decomposition body.  However ... after over a month ... would there still be a decomposition order?

What if Lindsey's remains were not disposed of but ... are out of sight ... maybe covered with debris or foilage.  Maybe her remains are lying not far from where she was last observed two blocks from home by a family friend who was driving to work.  Maybe a thorough search with the dogs should be conducted by authorities on ALL properties in that two block stretch.

Remember Jessica Lundsford.  This little girl's remains were found on property within a stone throw from her home ... from the bed she was abducted from. 

Janet

+++++++

McCleary Water / Wastewater manages both the water system from the wells into homes and businesses and the sewer system that takes wastewater to the treatment plant.

WATER SYSTEM FLUSHING

June 22nd through July 2nd


The City crew will be flushing the water system using various fire hydrants around town, click on the link below to read the entire Public Notice and what to do in your area when the flushing takes place.

Hydrant flushing notice 

Wastewater Treatment

Water System

http://www.cityofmccleary.com/index.asp?Type=B_BASIC&SEC={CAF3B3FA-696A-4B0F-B441-C68ADF931009}


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3
Post by: Tamikosmom on August 01, 2009, 07:47:33 PM
MuffyBee

decomposition order? s/b decomposition odor?

Thanks

I hope you are having a good day.

It is dinner time for me.

Janet
4:40 PM PT



Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3
Post by: Heidismom on August 01, 2009, 08:42:20 PM
The flushing of the water and treatment systems could have masked the initial strench of body decomposition body.  However ... after over a month ... would there still be a decomposition order?

What if Lindsey's remains were not disposed of but ... are out of sight ... maybe covered with debris or foilage.  Maybe her remains are lying not far from where she was last observed two blocks from home by a family friend who was driving to work.  Maybe a thorough search with the dogs should be conducted by authorities on ALL properties in that two block stretch.

Remember Jessica Lundsford.  This little girl's remains were found on property within a stone throw from her home ... from the bed she was abducted from. 

Janet

+++++++

McCleary Water / Wastewater manages both the water system from the wells into homes and businesses and the sewer system that takes wastewater to the treatment plant.

WATER SYSTEM FLUSHING

June 22nd through July 2nd


The City crew will be flushing the water system using various fire hydrants around town, click on the link below to read the entire Public Notice and what to do in your area when the flushing takes place.

Hydrant flushing notice 

Wastewater Treatment

Water System

http://www.cityofmccleary.com/index.asp?Type=B_BASIC&SEC={CAF3B3FA-696A-4B0F-B441-C68ADF931009}

While I don't know which houses were searched, I do know that yards were searched several blocks away.  Ours was searched, along with all our neighbors.  Day after day the dogs were on our street, mainly to gain access to another area.  The dogs appeared well trained to my uneducated eye, nose to the ground most of the time,  Concentrating on their business.  There were two large schnauzers, bloodhounds, german sheherds &  last was a golden retriever.


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3
Post by: Tamikosmom on August 01, 2009, 08:49:46 PM
The flushing of the water and treatment systems could have masked the initial strench of body decomposition body.  However ... after over a month ... would there still be a decomposition order?

What if Lindsey's remains were not disposed of but ... are out of sight ... maybe covered with debris or foilage.  Maybe her remains are lying not far from where she was last observed two blocks from home by a family friend who was driving to work.  Maybe a thorough search with the dogs should be conducted by authorities on ALL properties in that two block stretch.

Remember Jessica Lundsford.  This little girl's remains were found on property within a stone throw from her home ... from the bed she was abducted from. 

Janet

+++++++

McCleary Water / Wastewater manages both the water system from the wells into homes and businesses and the sewer system that takes wastewater to the treatment plant.

WATER SYSTEM FLUSHING

June 22nd through July 2nd


The City crew will be flushing the water system using various fire hydrants around town, click on the link below to read the entire Public Notice and what to do in your area when the flushing takes place.

Hydrant flushing notice 

Wastewater Treatment

Water System

http://www.cityofmccleary.com/index.asp?Type=B_BASIC&SEC={CAF3B3FA-696A-4B0F-B441-C68ADF931009}

While I don't know which houses were searched, I do know that yards were searched several blocks away.  Ours was searched, along with all our neighbors.  Day after day the dogs were on our street, mainly to gain access to another area.  The dogs appeared well trained to my uneducated eye, nose to the ground most of the time,  Concentrating on their business.  There were two large schnauzers, bloodhounds, german sheherds &  last was a golden retriever.


Thank you Heidismom.

Do you have any idea if the properties along Maple between 15th and the Baum residence were thoroughly searched.  According to authorities some of the residents had yet to be contacted up to a couple of days ago in regards to questioning.  I wonder if properties can be searched without homeowners' permission.

Janet


+++++

(http://i708.photobucket.com/albums/ww90/doubledeck/lindsey%20baum%20case/baumwatnemap1.jpg)

credit: doubledecker


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3
Post by: no rose colored glasses on August 01, 2009, 08:55:36 PM
Thanks for that info Heidismom.


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3
Post by: Heidismom on August 01, 2009, 09:04:31 PM
The flushing of the water and treatment systems could have masked the initial strench of body decomposition body.  However ... after over a month ... would there still be a decomposition order?

What if Lindsey's remains were not disposed of but ... are out of sight ... maybe covered with debris or foilage.  Maybe her remains are lying not far from where she was last observed two blocks from home by a family friend who was driving to work.  Maybe a thorough search with the dogs should be conducted by authorities on ALL properties in that two block stretch.

Remember Jessica Lundsford.  This little girl's remains were found on property within a stone throw from her home ... from the bed she was abducted from. 

Janet

+++++++

McCleary Water / Wastewater manages both the water system from the wells into homes and businesses and the sewer system that takes wastewater to the treatment plant.

WATER SYSTEM FLUSHING

June 22nd through July 2nd


The City crew will be flushing the water system using various fire hydrants around town, click on the link below to read the entire Public Notice and what to do in your area when the flushing takes place.

Hydrant flushing notice 

Wastewater Treatment

Water System

http://www.cityofmccleary.com/index.asp?Type=B_BASIC&SEC={CAF3B3FA-696A-4B0F-B441-C68ADF931009}

While I don't know which houses were searched, I do know that yards were searched several blocks away.  Ours was searched, along with all our neighbors.  Day after day the dogs were on our street, mainly to gain access to another area.  The dogs appeared well trained to my uneducated eye, nose to the ground most of the time,  Concentrating on their business.  There were two large schnauzers, bloodhounds, german sheherds &  last was a golden retriever.


Thank you Heidismom.

Do you have any idea if the properties along Maple between 15th and the Baum residence were thoroughly searched.  According to authorities some of the residents had yet to be contacted up to a couple of days ago in regards to questioning.  I wonder if properties can be searched without homeowners' permission.

Janet


+++++

(http://i708.photobucket.com/albums/ww90/doubledeck/lindsey%20baum%20case/baumwatnemap1.jpg)

credit: doubledecker
[/quote  I don't know about on Maple, I do know that although they told us they didn't search without permission, I saw search dogs in two yards where the owners were not home.


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3
Post by: no rose colored glasses on August 01, 2009, 09:14:58 PM
Heidismom  how are the people in town acting? Is activity somewhat back to normal, or are people being cautious and looking at certain people in town and being suspicious? Are the children out and about or with parents out with them? Being from a small town originally, I know how gossip must be, kind of hard not to.


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3
Post by: Tamikosmom on August 01, 2009, 09:47:47 PM
The flushing of the water and treatment systems could have masked the initial strench of body decomposition body.  However ... after over a month ... would there still be a decomposition order?

What if Lindsey's remains were not disposed of but ... are out of sight ... maybe covered with debris or foilage.  Maybe her remains are lying not far from where she was last observed two blocks from home by a family friend who was driving to work.  Maybe a thorough search with the dogs should be conducted by authorities on ALL properties in that two block stretch.

Remember Jessica Lundsford.  This little girl's remains were found on property within a stone throw from her home ... from the bed she was abducted from. 

Janet

+++++++

McCleary Water / Wastewater manages both the water system from the wells into homes and businesses and the sewer system that takes wastewater to the treatment plant.

WATER SYSTEM FLUSHING

June 22nd through July 2nd


The City crew will be flushing the water system using various fire hydrants around town, click on the link below to read the entire Public Notice and what to do in your area when the flushing takes place.

Hydrant flushing notice 

Wastewater Treatment

Water System

http://www.cityofmccleary.com/index.asp?Type=B_BASIC&SEC={CAF3B3FA-696A-4B0F-B441-C68ADF931009}

While I don't know which houses were searched, I do know that yards were searched several blocks away.  Ours was searched, along with all our neighbors.  Day after day the dogs were on our street, mainly to gain access to another area.  The dogs appeared well trained to my uneducated eye, nose to the ground most of the time,  Concentrating on their business.  There were two large schnauzers, bloodhounds, german sheherds &  last was a golden retriever.


Thank you Heidismom.

Do you have any idea if the properties along Maple between 15th and the Baum residence were thoroughly searched.  According to authorities some of the residents had yet to be contacted up to a couple of days ago in regards to questioning.  I wonder if properties can be searched without homeowners' permission.

Janet


+++++

(http://i708.photobucket.com/albums/ww90/doubledeck/lindsey%20baum%20case/baumwatnemap1.jpg)


credit: doubledecker
[/quote  I don't know about on Maple, I do know that although they told us they didn't search without permission, I saw search dogs in two yards where the owners were not home.


Thank you Heidismom.

I have email the FBI agent ... Ronald Twersky ... regarding my suspicions encompassing these properties.  I receeived a very nice form response.  Probably the same response sent to all who email regarding the case.  I was hoping for direct answers.

 ::MonkeyWaa::

Janet




Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3
Post by: mamacrazy30 on August 01, 2009, 11:33:23 PM
Fire was not mentioned to me by his classmate.   (I don't know how reply to a specific post)
sorry if it has been asked before but do you know what happened?


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3
Post by: Fanny Mae on August 01, 2009, 11:46:02 PM
In my view, searching the yards, and not inside the houses is an incomplete search. Do most houses there in McCleary have basements? Until they are throughly searched, along with the crawlspaces underneath, and in the attic areas, they have not done a thorough search job.

 Bodies have been sealed in containers, wrapped in blankets and stuffed in trunks for years without neighbors being suspicious. Deep freezers are the same. Bodies have been buried in unfinished basements. Think John Wayne Gacy. There were even police inside his home and didn't realize there were multiple bodies buried down there. But I believe a cadaver dog would have picked up on it.

Are the neighbors that live on the streets where Lindsay was know to be been unwilling for the LE to search their homes, or have the LE made no efforts to do so? 


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3
Post by: mamacrazy30 on August 01, 2009, 11:50:00 PM
In my view, searching the yards, and not inside the houses is an incomplete search. Do most houses there in McCleary have basements? Until they are throughly searched, along with the crawlspaces underneath, and in the attic areas, they have not done a thorough search job.

 Bodies have been sealed in containers, wrapped in blankets and stuffed in trunks for years without neighbors being suspicious. Deep freezers are the same. Bodies have been buried in unfinished basements. Think John Wayne Gacy. There were even police inside his home and didn't realize there were multiple bodies buried down there. But I believe a cadaver dog would have picked up on it.

Are the neighbors that live on the streets where Lindsay was know to be been unwilling for the LE to search their homes, or have the LE made no efforts to do so? 
miss Mae i'm afraid its the latter.... ::MonkeyNoNo::


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3
Post by: pink angel on August 02, 2009, 12:53:57 AM
Janet,
This is the first time I have posted, don't know if I am doing it right.
 But regarding Josh, he had a problem at school this spring, in which the classroom was evacuated, this is public knowledge, told to me by a reliable classmate.  Maybe this had something to do with his juvi thing, I don't know. If the court appearance was due to his mistreating his sister,  I wouldn't think he would be trusted to be the one that was supposed to walk her home. 
Wanna bet he pulled the fire alarm?
My brother did that in grade school and got arrested for it. They don't take that likely.

My brother had to go to court and got a year of court supervision and had to attend some type of class. I forget.


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3
Post by: Sister on August 02, 2009, 01:06:50 AM
Pink, I remember that happening at my school too!  The guys got into some big trouble, followed by an assembly where the fire marshall spoke.
But I suppose there are some who live in more pefect worlds, have more perfect children, more perfect grandchildren, more perfect neighbors, etc.  But the imperfect world in which I live is where I am planted and therefore where I bloom.
Justice of Lindsey!
P.S.  Good to see you.  Have been busy moving my sister's furniture, etc.  Am exhausted so just lurking for a while.


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3
Post by: pink angel on August 02, 2009, 01:08:01 AM
Janet,
This is the first time I have posted, don't know if I am doing it right.
 But regarding Josh, he had a problem at school this spring, in which the classroom was evacuated, this is public knowledge, told to me by a reliable classmate.  Maybe this had something to do with his juvi thing, I don't know. If the court appearance was due to his mistreating his sister,  I wouldn't think he would be trusted to be the one that was supposed to walk her home. 
Wanna bet he pulled the fire alarm?
My brother did that in grade school and got arrested for it. They don't take that likely.

My brother had to go to court and got a year of court supervision and had to attend some type of class. I forget.

I just called my mom and she said he was charged with a 3rd degree felony and also got a 500 dollar fine.

He would have been charged with a 2nd or 1st degree if anyone would have got hurt evacuating or a firefighter would have got hurt responding to the alarm.



Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3
Post by: pink angel on August 02, 2009, 01:15:10 AM
Pink, I remember that happening at my school too!  The guys got into some big trouble, followed by an assembly where the fire marshall spoke.
But I suppose there are some who live in more pefect worlds, have more perfect children, more perfect grandchildren, more perfect neighbors, etc.  But the imperfect world in which I live is where I am planted and therefore where I bloom.
Justice of Lindsey!
P.S.  Good to see you.  Have been busy moving my sister's furniture, etc.  Am exhausted so just lurking for a while.


Good to see you too hon. I am exhausted myself, not moving even my butt though.  ::MonkeyHaHa::

I have been busy since with the little man missing from Idaho, Robert Manwill. Such a tragedy in the making that one.  ::MonkeyNoNo::


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3
Post by: KarmaRoundUp on August 02, 2009, 09:59:30 AM
Janet,
This is the first time I have posted, don't know if I am doing it right.
 But regarding Josh, he had a problem at school this spring, in which the classroom was evacuated, this is public knowledge, told to me by a reliable classmate.  Maybe this had something to do with his juvi thing, I don't know. If the court appearance was due to his mistreating his sister,  I wouldn't think he would be trusted to be the one that was supposed to walk her home. 
Wanna bet he pulled the fire alarm?
My brother did that in grade school and got arrested for it. They don't take that likely.

My brother had to go to court and got a year of court supervision and had to attend some type of class. I forget.
But then wouldn't the whole school be evacuated instead of just one class room?


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3
Post by: no rose colored glasses on August 02, 2009, 10:30:28 AM
Janet,
This is the first time I have posted, don't know if I am doing it right.
 But regarding Josh, he had a problem at school this spring, in which the classroom was evacuated, this is public knowledge, told to me by a reliable classmate.  Maybe this had something to do with his juvi thing, I don't know. If the court appearance was due to his mistreating his sister,  I wouldn't think he would be trusted to be the one that was supposed to walk her home. 
Wanna bet he pulled the fire alarm?
My brother did that in grade school and got arrested for it. They don't take that likely.

My brother had to go to court and got a year of court supervision and had to attend some type of class. I forget.
But then wouldn't the whole school be evacuated instead of just one class room?
That's true, and I didn't realize the punishment for pulling a fire alarm at school would be that strict.


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3
Post by: Tamikosmom on August 02, 2009, 12:22:34 PM
If the fire alarm was pulled … the bell would have started ringing and … the entire school would have been evacuated.

An elementary student setting off a fire alarm would result in a reprimand by school officials and fire authorities but … somehow I do not believe there would legal consequences UNLESS it had happened before.

I contend the class evacuation incident was unrelated to the felony charges that resulted in a guilty plea by Josh.

Think about.  KaraK was uninformed regarding aspects encompassing Josh and the Juvenile Detention System.  Could it be that she was also unaware of the underlying dynamic encompassing the 911 call and the ride home from mlachester’s residence in a police car?

I cannot get past mlacheste claims.  If  I were to obstruct justice by fabricating a story encompassing an incident … I would not involve the small police force of McCleary in that fabrication.  Logic would dictate that my words could be easily disputed.

When all is said and done … this young man certainly had issues that reached beyond the average 12 year old.  This makes me both sad and suspicious.

Monkeys ... felony charges again a 12 year old boy is serious stuff.  How many 12 year olds do you know personally who have been charged with a felony.  I am 62 years of age and ... I do not know one.

Janet

+++++


KaraK
Re: Lindsey Baum, 10y missing from McCleary, WA 6/26/09
« Reply #1240 on: July 05, 2009, 10:56:04 PM »


I don't know if he ever actually went to juvie.  All I know for sure is he gets picked on a lot (my kids have participated verbally and been in trouble for this as well) by kids trying to get a reaction - spitting, name calling etc. - To my knowledge that is where most of his trouble has been with little fights amongst kids and complaints from them or their parents.

http://scaredmonkeys.net/index.php?topic=5541.msg865744#msg865744


mlachester 1 day ago wrote:

... Its no big secret she had came to my house to call 911 when her brother had done things to her.

http://www.king5.com/topstories/stories/NW_063009WAB-Mccleary-girl-search-LJ.1fc0b759.html?ocp=2#slcgm_comments_anchor


mlachester 2 hours ago wrote:

I am close to her and I know a lot more than the media or law enforcement are saying right now. … Sorry if you don't like the truth but I have never been one to keep the truth in and she should of been taken the first time she called 911 from my house asking for help instead of put in a police car and taken back to her abuser!"

http://www.king5.com/topstories/stor...omments_anchor


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3
Post by: pink angel on August 02, 2009, 12:52:53 PM
If the fire alarm was pulled … the bell would have started ringing and … the entire school would have been evacuated.

An elementary student setting off a fire alarm would result in a reprimand by school officials and fire authorities but … somehow I do not believe there would legal consequences UNLESS it had happened before.

I contend the class evacuation incident was unrelated to the felony charges that resulted in a guilty plea by Josh.

Think about.  KaraK was uninformed regarding aspects encompassing Josh and the Juvenile Detention System.  Could it be that she was also unaware of the underlying dynamic encompassing the 911 call and the ride home from mlachester’s residence in a police car?

I cannot get past mlacheste claims.  If  I were to obstruct justice by fabricating a story encompassing an incident … I would not involve the small police force of McCleary in that fabrication.  Logic would dictate that my words could be easily disputed.

When all is said and done … this young man certainly had issues that reached beyond the average 12 year old.  This makes me both sad and suspicious.

Monkeys ... felony charges again a 12 year old boy is serious stuff.  How many 12 year olds do you know personally who have been charged with a felony.  I am 62 years of age and ... I do not know one.

Janet

+++++


KaraK
Re: Lindsey Baum, 10y missing from McCleary, WA 6/26/09
« Reply #1240 on: July 05, 2009, 10:56:04 PM »


I don't know if he ever actually went to juvie.  All I know for sure is he gets picked on a lot (my kids have participated verbally and been in trouble for this as well) by kids trying to get a reaction - spitting, name calling etc. - To my knowledge that is where most of his trouble has been with little fights amongst kids and complaints from them or their parents.

http://scaredmonkeys.net/index.php?topic=5541.msg865744#msg865744


mlachester 1 day ago wrote:

... Its no big secret she had came to my house to call 911 when her brother had done things to her.

http://www.king5.com/topstories/stories/NW_063009WAB-Mccleary-girl-search-LJ.1fc0b759.html?ocp=2#slcgm_comments_anchor


mlachester 2 hours ago wrote:

I am close to her and I know a lot more than the media or law enforcement are saying right now. … Sorry if you don't like the truth but I have never been one to keep the truth in and she should of been taken the first time she called 911 from my house asking for help instead of put in a police car and taken back to her abuser!"

http://www.king5.com/topstories/stor...omments_anchor


So you are saying I am lying? Okay.
I know my brother was charged with a 3rd degree felony. My brother had never been in any trouble before.



Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3
Post by: KarmaRoundUp on August 02, 2009, 01:03:26 PM
"I Will Find My Daughter"





Power lines hang low over the narrow, gravel-lined stretch of asphalt in McCleary called Maple Street.

Cars roll past rows of small houses. Sprinklers spin in the front yards. Shrubs and street lights stand on either side of the road.

From the front step of her nearby home, Melissa Baum can almost see its intersection with Fifth Street where her 11-year-old daughter took her last known steps into oblivion.

“I feel like she’s right under my nose and I can’t find her,” she said.

Baum sat on her front step earlier this week, staring eastward toward Maple Street with the faint plinking of wind chimes behind her. She lit a cigarette.

“It’s really frustrating,” she said.

The family dog, Cadence, curled up on the concrete at her feet. Signs of support hung in the windows. Empty Diet Coke cans and fountain drinks sat stacked beside her chair after hours of waiting and watching the end of the road.

“It was all a fluke that whole night,” Baum explained quietly. “It’s like everything fell into place. The one time she left the house without her cell phone. The one time she started walking home alone.”
more at link

http://**/articles/2009/08/02/local_news/doc4a75285b085b5140001671.txt




Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3
Post by: Sister on August 02, 2009, 01:14:54 PM
Pink, of course you are not lying.  There are just some that know everything about everything.  I am trying to learn to just ignore them and their ignorance.  Course, as has been noted on here numerous times, there are some that want to make the number of their posts go up, so they quote and quote old stuff and bump and bump stuff.  Let it go my friend.  It aint' worth it.  The Mods are very patient, but eventually they always take care of it, which is why I like this board so much.  Blessings.


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3
Post by: no rose colored glasses on August 02, 2009, 01:21:07 PM
Pink, I don't think you are lying at all, I'm just surprised at such a punishment for doing that, things sure have changed since I was young, you would have gotten into trouble, but nothing like that.


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3
Post by: doubledecker on August 02, 2009, 01:28:59 PM
"I Will Find My Daughter"





Power lines hang low over the narrow, gravel-lined stretch of asphalt in McCleary called Maple Street.

Cars roll past rows of small houses. Sprinklers spin in the front yards. Shrubs and street lights stand on either side of the road.

From the front step of her nearby home, Melissa Baum can almost see its intersection with Fifth Street where her 11-year-old daughter took her last known steps into oblivion.

“I feel like she’s right under my nose and I can’t find her,” she said.

Baum sat on her front step earlier this week, staring eastward toward Maple Street with the faint plinking of wind chimes behind her. She lit a cigarette.

“It’s really frustrating,” she said.

The family dog, Cadence, curled up on the concrete at her feet. Signs of support hung in the windows. Empty Diet Coke cans and fountain drinks sat stacked beside her chair after hours of waiting and watching the end of the road.

“It was all a fluke that whole night,” Baum explained quietly. “It’s like everything fell into place. The one time she left the house without her cell phone. The one time she started walking home alone.”
more at link

http://**/articles/2009/08/02/local_news/doc4a75285b085b5140001671.txt



MB had thought her daughter was far away, now she thinks lindsey is right there under her nose.  Also now it is saying her last steps were near 5th street.  What happened to the other sighting up close to 3rd? 

so something changed?  What do they know NOW that we don't. 

I always felt lindsey did not get to 5th and turned around back to 6th. 

Is this news report in error, or has the info changed now and MB has been told something new that has not come out in public. 

of course we can really believe news reports 100%, but it seems, if this is true, MB does not think the same things as she did at first, and lindsey disappeared around 5th and did not get any farther up maple.  ???


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3
Post by: no rose colored glasses on August 02, 2009, 01:32:17 PM
DD, I have no idea  ::MonkeyConfused::  Unless LE does have something and they told her mother, otherwise why else would you change your thoughts? This is reminding me more and more of Satsuma Florida and Haleigh's case, I just don't know what to believe or what not to believe.


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3
Post by: doubledecker on August 02, 2009, 01:34:47 PM
just to let you know, I know a LOT Of kids 12 (and under) who have been charged with felonies.  They commit crimes all the time.  And I knew of some who did this back when I was that age also.  The cali napa state hospital was full of them, and there were some in CYA.  Junvenile had kids that young when I was that age, and CYA had a few that young as well. 

KIDS commit felonies all the time.  More and more of them are committing felonies at younger ages now, but kids did it back then too.  I saw it all the time. 


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3
Post by: no rose colored glasses on August 02, 2009, 01:45:02 PM
just to let you know, I know a LOT Of kids 12 (and under) who have been charged with felonies.  They commit crimes all the time.  And I knew of some who did this back when I was that age also.  The cali napa state hospital was full of them, and there were some in CYA.  Junvenile had kids that young when I was that age, and CYA had a few that young as well. 

KIDS commit felonies all the time.  More and more of them are committing felonies at younger ages now, but kids did it back then too.  I saw it all the time. 
I have no doubt about that, I never knew of any kids charged with felonies when I was growing up at all. I will say that growing up where I did in the Midwest, we sure were sheltered, when I left home at 18 and went to Long Beach CA, I swear that I was on a different planet. I grew up in Catholic schools and if someone would have pulled a fire alarm, yes, there would have been punishment, but I think it would have been between the school and parents.


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3
Post by: Rob on August 02, 2009, 02:25:52 PM
Well, where to start?

Most of you monks and monkettes that know me from the beginning here know I was quite the hell raiser when I was a kid. I never denied that. I threw snowballs at cop cars, lit firecrackers in places I certainly shouldn't have, threw lemon-heads at mass transit buses...  and did a host of other stuff that wasn't considered the best of ideas. In the group of troublemakers I grew up with, one went on to become a high-school bathroom bomber and caused hundreds of thousands of dollars in damage, one when on a killing spree where 8 people died, 7 initially and one years later from his injuries. The fire alarm in our junior and senior highschool was pulled at least once a week and I went to the most prestigious school district in my state. Not every hell raiser goes on to a life of crime, but it's not a good start.

As for Josh, he's just a kid. Surely not having his dad around has certainly hurt his overall chances and not made life easier. His dad seems like a nice guy and is in the military. I'm not sure why anyone thinks he could be involved in anything nefarious at this late date. He has been checked and rechecked and tripled checked. I'm pretty sure he does the normal trouble making stuff all other - or - most other 12 years olds do. They are kids and they often don't think through their actions. If he pulled a fire alarm, and I don't know if he did or didn't, but how does an incident like that possibly escalate to disappearing his sister so well that in four weeks he hasn't cracked and no one has found Lindsey. He's a 12 year old.

I'm starting to think that some of the obsessions placed on Josh and Watne are completely unfounded and I'm trying to figure out what posters here know that the police don't? Please don't take my words as personal criticism, because they are not.  I'm honestly asking, like Jess and DD did... someone show me how he is involved and I will re-evaluate my thoughts on the case.

When someone says that - she has long fingernails and her brother can vouch for that (paraphrased) - I think that is simply a statement that he and his sister have had disagreements. I know my sister and I certainly had many many over the years - brothers and sisters often do. It's the nature of being a brother and a sister. I see nothing in that statement that allows me to draw any conclusions that Lindsey scratched Josh and that's the EVIDENCE that we all need to start an indictment.

A 12 year old would crack and cry that he has harmed his sister. In fact, I'm certain that he would. Maybe he does have some developmental issues. I feel sorry for him and he needs to get some help before he has life long problems. Childish mischief is just that - childish. It doesn't allow me to conclude that he is the next Charles Manson based on just a possible fire alarm.

His mother seems to care about him and Lindsey very much and she's just a mom trying to make her way in life with the odds stacked against her. If you didn't think they were stacked against her before, well they sure are now. Josh's mom is doing the best she can. Let's remember that she is a person with feelings too, and her kids were happy and healthy before this horrible tragic event hit them all.

These people deserve sympathy, not ridicule from forum posters.

Off my soap box...



Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3
Post by: doubledecker on August 02, 2009, 02:29:07 PM
just to let you know, I know a LOT Of kids 12 (and under) who have been charged with felonies.  They commit crimes all the time.  And I knew of some who did this back when I was that age also.  The cali napa state hospital was full of them, and there were some in CYA.  Junvenile had kids that young when I was that age, and CYA had a few that young as well. 

KIDS commit felonies all the time.  More and more of them are committing felonies at younger ages now, but kids did it back then too.  I saw it all the time. 
I have no doubt about that, I never knew of any kids charged with felonies when I was growing up at all. I will say that growing up where I did in the Midwest, we sure were sheltered, when I left home at 18 and went to Long Beach CA, I swear that I was on a different planet. I grew up in Catholic schools and if someone would have pulled a fire alarm, yes, there would have been punishment, but I think it would have been between the school and parents.

well I pulled the fire alarm a couple of time ugh , yes, I was a wild kid.  I did not get caught. I was in like 2nd grade ugh.  in jr high the fire alarm went off at least once a week, sometimes more.  people get suspended for a few days is all.  We had a lot of fights and bad ones too, broken noses, legs, people beat up pretty bad.  Still people did not get in too much trouble. It was an every day occurence to have fights at school.  If you got in a fight with a teacher or the principal you got arrested and charged with assault. there were some of those too.  There were gang fighting almost every day, riots, etc.  And I did not even live in the bad section of town.  I don't really know what the problem was, but there certainly was one.  But all this aside, I don't know anyone who got mad and killed their sister.


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3
Post by: doubledecker on August 02, 2009, 02:35:29 PM
hehe rob, just read your post, did we come from the same place hahahah

and mind you I grew up when fighting in a gang was with knives and chains; long before gangs were really all over.  It was a rarity to be in one.  but there were some young kids in them even then, but still no one killed their family members.  Josh is mild to the kids I knew. 


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3
Post by: KarmaRoundUp on August 02, 2009, 02:49:48 PM
"I Will Find My Daughter"





Power lines hang low over the narrow, gravel-lined stretch of asphalt in McCleary called Maple Street.

Cars roll past rows of small houses. Sprinklers spin in the front yards. Shrubs and street lights stand on either side of the road.

From the front step of her nearby home, Melissa Baum can almost see its intersection with Fifth Street where her 11-year-old daughter took her last known steps into oblivion.

“I feel like she’s right under my nose and I can’t find her,” she said.

Baum sat on her front step earlier this week, staring eastward toward Maple Street with the faint plinking of wind chimes behind her. She lit a cigarette.

“It’s really frustrating,” she said.

The family dog, Cadence, curled up on the concrete at her feet. Signs of support hung in the windows. Empty Diet Coke cans and fountain drinks sat stacked beside her chair after hours of waiting and watching the end of the road.

“It was all a fluke that whole night,” Baum explained quietly. “It’s like everything fell into place. The one time she left the house without her cell phone. The one time she started walking home alone.”
more at link

http://**/articles/2009/08/02/local_news/doc4a75285b085b5140001671.txt



MB had thought her daughter was far away, now she thinks lindsey is right there under her nose.  Also now it is saying her last steps were near 5th street.  What happened to the other sighting up close to 3rd? 

so something changed?  What do they know NOW that we don't. 

I always felt lindsey did not get to 5th and turned around back to 6th. 

Is this news report in error, or has the info changed now and MB has been told something new that has not come out in public. 

of course we can really believe news reports 100%, but it seems, if this is true, MB does not think the same things as she did at first, and lindsey disappeared around 5th and did not get any farther up maple.  ???
DD,I truly don't know but I feel so heartbroken for Melissa.....she is probably devasted and will be until she gets Lindsey back or they find out what happened to her.No one on this beautiful earth just disappears like that.She must be somewhere,dead or alive.
Where she was last seen was probably just mixed up and exaggerated by the reporter from The Daily World.
Just like media and LE kept saying it was only a 4 block walk home and we could look at all of the maps and see for ourselves it is at least 6 blocks long.
I dunno,I am so dispirited today.   ::MonkeyWaa::


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3
Post by: no rose colored glasses on August 02, 2009, 02:50:56 PM
hehe rob, just read your post, did we come from the same place hahahah

and mind you I grew up when fighting in a gang was with knives and chains; long before gangs were really all over.  It was a rarity to be in one.  but there were some young kids in them even then, but still no one killed their family members.  Josh is mild to the kids I knew. 
I have a cousin that did some of the things Rob mentioned, maybe you are my cousin  ::MonkeyDevil::  I think maybe the kids I went to school with were too afraid of the nuns to do anything like that, seriously I know I was  ::MonkeyEek:: I must have had a really tame childhood, because nobody ever pulled a fire alarm or anything like that, but I can see how tempting that might be for some kids, wanting to know what would all happen if you pull the alarm.


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3
Post by: Rob on August 02, 2009, 02:56:15 PM
hehe rob, just read your post, did we come from the same place hahahah

and mind you I grew up when fighting in a gang was with knives and chains; long before gangs were really all over.  It was a rarity to be in one.  but there were some young kids in them even then, but still no one killed their family members.  Josh is mild to the kids I knew. 

you know DD, there is a big difference between a kid like Josh and the van der Sloot spawns. Josh is just a little bot without a dad and trying to make some friend and maybe he just doesn't fit in with the in crowds and he has things he likes to do. He grew up somewhere else and moved somewhere new. It takes time to find some new friends. We have all been there. Parents get transferred and move and the kids go too.

the van der Sloot kids have a litany of pre-determined fate enabling hard years ahead. And here you have parents that just don't give a darn. Every kid in that family has had brushes with the law and one has disappear a tourist. And the parent keep on keepin-on. No change in their parenting and the results are the same.

With Josh and Lindsey, at least Melissa cares and tries her best to raise her kids. And by the way, all kids will be walking alone at some point. It's unfair to blame anything like walking alone on her. She lives in a neighbor full of kids and the kids all go to each other's homes. It's unrealistic to think that a child will stay home and not go to a friends house to go swimming because the mother or father is not there to walk them back and forth. Parent work to support their kids - they are not always around to hold their hands and cross the street with them.


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3
Post by: KarmaRoundUp on August 02, 2009, 02:59:15 PM
I also want to state that we are all here just giving opinions and WE are not charging or convicting anyone with anything.I'm open minded and believe all opinions should be welcomed,even if it's about Wayne Watne or Josh(who has a felony record).
I don't think anyone here should have the right to put down others here because of their opinions.


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3
Post by: doubledecker on August 02, 2009, 03:27:17 PM
I also want to state that we are all here just giving opinions and WE are not charging or convicting anyone with anything.I'm open minded and believe all opinions should be welcomed,even if it's about Wayne Watne or Josh(who has a felony record).
I don't think anyone here should have the right to put down others here because of their opinions.

I like to look at every possible theory.  I like to find the reasons why and why not.  I like to try to base what "I" think on something I can show some proof of, but I always have my opinions of "just because I think so", as well. 

I think we all use a lot of our own personal experiences and what "we know" throughout our "own life".  Because we come from all walks of life, we get many different opinions based upon our "own experiences".  What seems extreme to one person might not even register with another.  I can get pretty biased on what I think because of this.  So this is why I try to look at everyone elses theories as well, because the person we are looking for might be more like someone else than they are like me.  So I usually keep my true opinions to myself LOL  And when I don't, you can see why LOL 

but I like to believe I know what criminals think LOL, and this really does bias me.  I try not to let that hinder my research though, because someone else might be right, and I might be very wrong. 

But I still ask a lot of questions so I can try to understand why people think what they do.  It is not even that I am debating, I rarely am; I'm just trying to understand why someone else might think something that I just can't see how it is possible.


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3
Post by: Tamikosmom on August 02, 2009, 03:37:16 PM
If the fire alarm was pulled … the bell would have started ringing and … the entire school would have been evacuated.

An elementary student setting off a fire alarm would result in a reprimand by school officials and fire authorities but … somehow I do not believe there would legal consequences UNLESS it had happened before.

I contend the class evacuation incident was unrelated to the felony charges that resulted in a guilty plea by Josh.

Think about.  KaraK was uninformed regarding aspects encompassing Josh and the Juvenile Detention System.  Could it be that she was also unaware of the underlying dynamic encompassing the 911 call and the ride home from mlachester’s residence in a police car?

I cannot get past mlacheste claims.  If  I were to obstruct justice by fabricating a story encompassing an incident … I would not involve the small police force of McCleary in that fabrication.  Logic would dictate that my words could be easily disputed.

When all is said and done … this young man certainly had issues that reached beyond the average 12 year old.  This makes me both sad and suspicious.

Monkeys ... felony charges again a 12 year old boy is serious stuff.  How many 12 year olds do you know personally who have been charged with a felony.  I am 62 years of age and ... I do not know one.

Janet

+++++


KaraK
Re: Lindsey Baum, 10y missing from McCleary, WA 6/26/09
« Reply #1240 on: July 05, 2009, 10:56:04 PM »


I don't know if he ever actually went to juvie.  All I know for sure is he gets picked on a lot (my kids have participated verbally and been in trouble for this as well) by kids trying to get a reaction - spitting, name calling etc. - To my knowledge that is where most of his trouble has been with little fights amongst kids and complaints from them or their parents.

http://scaredmonkeys.net/index.php?topic=5541.msg865744#msg865744


mlachester 1 day ago wrote:

... Its no big secret she had came to my house to call 911 when her brother had done things to her.

http://www.king5.com/topstories/stories/NW_063009WAB-Mccleary-girl-search-LJ.1fc0b759.html?ocp=2#slcgm_comments_anchor


mlachester 2 hours ago wrote:

I am close to her and I know a lot more than the media or law enforcement are saying right now. … Sorry if you don't like the truth but I have never been one to keep the truth in and she should of been taken the first time she called 911 from my house asking for help instead of put in a police car and taken back to her abuser!"

http://www.king5.com/topstories/stor...omments_anchor


So you are saying I am lying? Okay.
I know my brother was charged with a 3rd degree felony. My brother had never been in any trouble before.



Pink Angel

I think in your heart you comprehend what I am attempting to convey.

I am just stating that I have not known anybody 12 years of age and under who has been charged with a felony.

Janet


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3
Post by: KarmaRoundUp on August 02, 2009, 03:41:21 PM
I agree with your last post DD.


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3
Post by: pink angel on August 02, 2009, 03:52:12 PM
Rob,

So nice to see you! :)

I agree with posts 100 percent. Well said.


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3
Post by: Tracygirl on August 02, 2009, 03:57:37 PM
Good posts Rob and DD. Are there any leading suspects? 


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3
Post by: JessStar on August 02, 2009, 03:58:08 PM
Rob, excellent post.   You hit the nail on head with Josh. 

As an aside, I caught this from the article from The Daily World:

Baum said she and her 12-year-old son, Josh, will sit down at night to watch a movie and feel overwhelmed by Lindsey’s absence.

During the first two weeks, she almost never left home for fear she would miss a phone call. She now tries to stay busy throughout the day by posting fliers, often replacing old black-and-white versions with color posters. She talks to investigators and tries to make sure Josh has things to keep his mind occupied.

“He’s having a difficult time,” Baum said. “He’s angry. He misses his sister a lot. He’s wanting to go out and find whoever has her."

Now, I suppose we can surmise that MB is covering for him.  But how unlikely is that. . .  JMO


http://**/articles/2009/08/02/local_news/doc4a75285b085b5140001671.txt


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3
Post by: Tamikosmom on August 02, 2009, 03:59:45 PM
Are the following contradictary quotes words of a distraught mother who does not have a clue or ... do those words imply some kind of knowledge in regards to her precious daughter?

Janet

+++++++


MELISSA BAUM - THEN

FOX News – July 1, 2009-08-02


Melissa Baum said she thinks her little girl Lindsey, who vanished Friday night, was snatched and is no longer in their hometown.

"I don’t think she’s in McCleary. I don’t," Baum told The Daily World of Aberdeen, Wash. "Why would they keep her in McCleary? Whoever took her went on the freeway. There are three ways to get out of McCleary and all three ways there are freeways within five or 10 minutes."

http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,5296...latestnews


MELISSA BAUM - NOW

Daily World – August 2, 2009-08-02


From the front step of her nearby home, Melissa Baum can almost see its intersection with Fifth Street where her 11-year-old daughter took her last known steps into oblivion.

“I feel like she’s right under my nose and I can’t find her,” she said.

http://**/articles/2009/08/02/local_news/doc4a75285b085b5140001671.txt


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3
Post by: doubledecker on August 02, 2009, 04:23:56 PM
Good posts Rob and DD. Are there any leading suspects? 

I tracygirl, glad to see you.  There are some threads we started for different people.  Seems as always, there are so many possibles and everyone has different opinions who is the most suspect. 

As for the police, I truly believe they THINK something, but they are not saying.  I have changed my mind a few times about what I thought since the beginning, only because I dig up more stuff and someone else starts not looking so suspicious and some other person pops on the scene and I find something which makes me think they are more suspicious. 

there are so many sex offenders in the area, of course they are always suspect.  And you know how the family and close friends always manage to get on the radar at the beginning of every case.  Then there were some local Satanists who got on my radar.  Then the church person hanging out with Josh got on people's radar.  Of course there comes a time you suspect the cops when they can't find anyone to arrest LOL 

so, yes there are a lot of people who are suspect.  I've zero'd in on a few of my own, as has everyone on the board, but can we all narrow it down and say wow at someone.. not yet.  LOL 

you might as well read the threads and jump in here with your own opinion.  Maybe you will see something we missed.  I hope so LOL


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3
Post by: doubledecker on August 02, 2009, 04:28:44 PM
Are the following contradictary quotes words of a distraught mother who does not have a clue or ... do those words imply some kind of knowledge in regards to her precious daughter?

Janet

+++++++


MELISSA BAUM - THEN

FOX News – July 1, 2009-08-02


Melissa Baum said she thinks her little girl Lindsey, who vanished Friday night, was snatched and is no longer in their hometown.

"I don’t think she’s in McCleary. I don’t," Baum told The Daily World of Aberdeen, Wash. "Why would they keep her in McCleary? Whoever took her went on the freeway. There are three ways to get out of McCleary and all three ways there are freeways within five or 10 minutes."

http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,5296...latestnews


MELISSA BAUM - NOW

Daily World – August 2, 2009-08-02


From the front step of her nearby home, Melissa Baum can almost see its intersection with Fifth Street where her 11-year-old daughter took her last known steps into oblivion.

“I feel like she’s right under my nose and I can’t find her,” she said.

http://**/articles/2009/08/02/local_news/doc4a75285b085b5140001671.txt


I believe Melissa Baum would be much like the rest of us, we start out with one thought at the beginning and as we find out more that is going on, we can change out mind about what we initially thought.  She has to know a lot more now than she did in the beginning.  I know a lot more now and I am not even living there, nor do I have the police telling me things they are probably telling her.  So my guess is, the more she hears the more she might change her mind. 


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3
Post by: doubledecker on August 02, 2009, 04:37:48 PM
okay I found out a couple of things. 

one -
The man seen walking into the PD with Melissa Baum, is her younger brother. He's been "cleared" and came to escort her through the waves of media that was there at that time. 



Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3
Post by: Rob on August 02, 2009, 04:37:53 PM
Thanks Traceygirl, Jess and Pink Angel.

++++

As far as I know there are no suspects. I have not seen anything that leads anyone where. Maybe I'm wrong and missed something, but there is nothing in the public domain that leads me to think they (the police) have a theory (other than abducted) or POI under the radar.

Here would be a list of possibilities...just some thoughts.

1. Sex offender, with multiple crimes under his belt - never been caught.
2. Repeat sex offender - previously incarcerated. Registered SO.
3. Sex offender committing his first crime. And unknown to police.
4. Unknown perp, and crime not committed for sexual assault.
5. Completely unknown perp such as Melissa Huckaby.

Just some ideas ...


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3
Post by: doubledecker on August 02, 2009, 04:39:43 PM
I also just got this info

 Josh - Lindsey's brother has Aspergers and ADHD and he has NEVER been to juvie over anything related to his sister or school at all


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3
Post by: pink angel on August 02, 2009, 04:54:36 PM
I also just got this info

 Josh - Lindsey's brother has Aspergers and ADHD and he has NEVER been to juvie over anything related to his sister or school at all

Exactly. I don't doubt he was in trouble but I think "juvie" was talked about or threatened by someone as possible punishment and Lindsey in her 10 year old mind thought it was a real possibility at the next days court date or she wished it would happen.



Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3
Post by: Tamikosmom on August 02, 2009, 04:55:04 PM
Are the following contradictary quotes words of a distraught mother who does not have a clue or ... do those words imply some kind of knowledge in regards to her precious daughter?

Janet

+++++++


MELISSA BAUM - THEN

FOX News – July 1, 2009-08-02


Melissa Baum said she thinks her little girl Lindsey, who vanished Friday night, was snatched and is no longer in their hometown.

"I don’t think she’s in McCleary. I don’t," Baum told The Daily World of Aberdeen, Wash. "Why would they keep her in McCleary? Whoever took her went on the freeway. There are three ways to get out of McCleary and all three ways there are freeways within five or 10 minutes."

http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,5296...latestnews


MELISSA BAUM - NOW

Daily World – August 2, 2009-08-02


From the front step of her nearby home, Melissa Baum can almost see its intersection with Fifth Street where her 11-year-old daughter took her last known steps into oblivion.

“I feel like she’s right under my nose and I can’t find her,” she said.

http://**/articles/2009/08/02/local_news/doc4a75285b085b5140001671.txt


I believe Melissa Baum would be much like the rest of us, we start out with one thought at the beginning and as we find out more that is going on, we can change out mind about what we initially thought.  She has to know a lot more now than she did in the beginning.  I know a lot more now and I am not even living there, nor do I have the police telling me things they are probably telling her.  So my guess is, the more she hears the more she might change her mind. 

DD

What do think Melissa Baum could have learned since July 1, 2009 that would change her thoughts concerning the whereabouts of her daughte?  To go from "out of the area" to "right under my nose" is quite a flip flop.

At this point in time ... I will give Melissa the benefit of my doubts that in her disperation ... she does not know what to think.

Janet



Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3
Post by: Tamikosmom on August 02, 2009, 04:59:25 PM
I also just got this info

 Josh - Lindsey's brother has Aspergers and ADHD and he has NEVER been to juvie over anything related to his sister or school at all

dd

Are you say that you know for sure that John Baum never pleaded guilty to a felony in Juvenile Court or ... are you implying the charges were unrelated to Lindsey or school.

Janet


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3
Post by: Tamikosmom on August 02, 2009, 05:00:17 PM
Above post.

John s/b Josh

Thanks

Janet


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3
Post by: Tracygirl on August 02, 2009, 05:01:46 PM
I also just got this info

 Josh - Lindsey's brother has Aspergers and ADHD and he has NEVER been to juvie over anything related to his sister or school at all

Yep, knew it! If you live with a person with autism, you can call it at least 2000 miles away over a computer.



Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3
Post by: Tracygirl on August 02, 2009, 05:07:41 PM
Has Kara's brother ever been looked at? Can't recall his name right now, he was on my radar in the beginning because of the myspace connection. It seemed to me Lindsey was displaying some of the introspective thoughts as he was. Also, the ex sister in law, michelle. Anything on them?


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3
Post by: Tamikosmom on August 02, 2009, 05:07:50 PM
I also just got this info

 Josh - Lindsey's brother has Aspergers and ADHD and he has NEVER been to juvie over anything related to his sister or school at all

Exactly. I don't doubt he was in trouble but I think "juvie" was talked about or threatened by someone as possible punishment and Lindsey in her 10 year old mind thought it was a real possibility at the next days court date or she wished it would happen.



Pink Angel

Think about it.  What were the underlying dynamics in the sibling relationship that would cause Lindsey to articulate happiness at the prospect of her brother being removed from the home?  In my world ... this mindset goes way beyond sibling rivalry.

Janet

+++++++


LINDSEY BAUM - IN HER OWN WORDS

Lindsey Baum:  Facebook Entry

TWILIGHT FREAK is happy that her brother is going to juvi tomorrow.Mood: happ at 14:10 17 Jun view more

Lindsey Baum is happy that her brother is going to juvie tomorrow.
Mood: Happ at 14:10 17 June

http://www.myspace.com/477760045






Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3
Post by: doubledecker on August 02, 2009, 05:12:14 PM
Are the following contradictary quotes words of a distraught mother who does not have a clue or ... do those words imply some kind of knowledge in regards to her precious daughter?

Janet

+++++++


MELISSA BAUM - THEN

FOX News – July 1, 2009-08-02


Melissa Baum said she thinks her little girl Lindsey, who vanished Friday night, was snatched and is no longer in their hometown.

"I don’t think she’s in McCleary. I don’t," Baum told The Daily World of Aberdeen, Wash. "Why would they keep her in McCleary? Whoever took her went on the freeway. There are three ways to get out of McCleary and all three ways there are freeways within five or 10 minutes."

http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,5296...latestnews


MELISSA BAUM - NOW

Daily World – August 2, 2009-08-02


From the front step of her nearby home, Melissa Baum can almost see its intersection with Fifth Street where her 11-year-old daughter took her last known steps into oblivion.

“I feel like she’s right under my nose and I can’t find her,” she said.

http://**/articles/2009/08/02/local_news/doc4a75285b085b5140001671.txt


I believe Melissa Baum would be much like the rest of us, we start out with one thought at the beginning and as we find out more that is going on, we can change out mind about what we initially thought.  She has to know a lot more now than she did in the beginning.  I know a lot more now and I am not even living there, nor do I have the police telling me things they are probably telling her.  So my guess is, the more she hears the more she might change her mind. 

DD

What do think Melissa Baum could have learned since July 1, 2009 that would change her thoughts concerning the whereabouts of her daughte?  To go from "out of the area" to "right under my nose" is quite a flip flop.

At this point in time ... I will give Melissa the benefit of my doubts that in her disperation ... she does not know what to think.

Janet



I have no idea.  it's also possible "right under my nose" means something that she thinks to be where she is, as in right where she thinks or has thought about, rather than a physical location. 


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3
Post by: doubledecker on August 02, 2009, 05:18:18 PM
I also just got this info

 Josh - Lindsey's brother has Aspergers and ADHD and he has NEVER been to juvie over anything related to his sister or school at all

dd

Are you say that you know for sure that John Baum never pleaded guilty to a felony in Juvenile Court or ... are you implying the charges were unrelated to Lindsey or school.

Janet


I am not implying anything. what I just said was word for word exactly what I was told.  To tell you the truth I don't have the time to really think about all this because personally I am onto something else that has nothing whatsoever to do with Josh.  But if I can post something I have been told to help others, then I post it. 

I personally am not going to sit here and research josh baum.  I have to work on something else right now that I personally feel is something I need to do to help with something about this case. It involves something totally different, so sorry, I just don't have the time to discuss Josh Baum.  I personally believe he had nothing whatsoever to do with lindsey's disappearance and I am looking at something which I believe might very well have something to do with her and so I have to concentrate on that right now. 



Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3
Post by: Fanny Mae on August 02, 2009, 05:20:01 PM
PLEASE GO TO THE PRAYER REQUEST THREAD AND LEAVE A POST FOR NORTHERN ROSE.

http://scaredmonkeys.net/index.php?topic=21.new#new


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3
Post by: doubledecker on August 02, 2009, 05:27:17 PM
I am going to go out on a limb here.  I will say this then I don't have time for the josh baum theory. 

I have asked for the info jessstar needs to look up the public record for josh.  Someone was going to ask for that info yesterday.  that would settle all of this.  I have not heard back from that person yet, but as soon as I do I will know whether or not that person is willing to give us the info so jessstar can look for that record.  I explained that this would end all this back and forth yes there was a 911 report and no there was not.  At this point I am not choosing sides as to who to believe, although I feel if a person can settle this they should so we can get on to whatever it is we are doing.

if this person can prove this report exists, then we will know.  If they choose not to help prove this, then why should I believe anything they say?  we have a couple of people who obviously had some kind of disagreement along the line somewhere and one says this and the other says that.  I can't say oh I believe one because they say so.  if one of them can PROVE they are the one telling the truth and that the other is lying, they the one who has the means to PROVE it should.  So if they choose not to do so, I am not believing them. 

if they are so outspoken with the truth, then they should give up that info.  If not, then I guess they are really that concerned about the truth, rather all they want to do is bash lindsey's family.  that is my personal opinion.

actually to tell you the truth I need off of here for a bit because I am getting aggrivated at this whole josh baum thing. 

if anyone needs me, you can find me at my profile. 



Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3
Post by: Rob on August 02, 2009, 05:30:24 PM
I also just got this info

 Josh - Lindsey's brother has Aspergers and ADHD and he has NEVER been to juvie over anything related to his sister or school at all

dd

Are you say that you know for sure that John Baum never pleaded guilty to a felony in Juvenile Court or ... are you implying the charges were unrelated to Lindsey or school.

Janet


I am not implying anything. what I just said was word for word exactly what I was told.  To tell you the truth I don't have the time to really think about all this because personally I am onto something else that has nothing whatsoever to do with Josh.  But if I can post something I have been told to help others, then I post it. 

I personally am not going to sit here and research josh baum.  I have to work on something else right now that I personally feel is something I need to do to help with something about this case. It involves something totally different, so sorry, I just don't have the time to discuss Josh Baum.  I personally believe he had nothing whatsoever to do with lindsey's disappearance and I am looking at something which I believe might very well have something to do with her and so I have to concentrate on that right now. 



I'll be interested to see what it is, when you can share.


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3
Post by: pink angel on August 02, 2009, 05:35:15 PM
I also just got this info

 Josh - Lindsey's brother has Aspergers and ADHD and he has NEVER been to juvie over anything related to his sister or school at all

Exactly. I don't doubt he was in trouble but I think "juvie" was talked about or threatened by someone as possible punishment and Lindsey in her 10 year old mind thought it was a real possibility at the next days court date or she wished it would happen.



Pink Angel

Think about it.  What were the underlying dynamics in the sibling relationship that would cause Lindsey to articulate happiness at the prospect of her brother being removed from the home?  In my world ... this mindset goes way beyond sibling rivalry.

Janet

+++++++


LINDSEY BAUM - IN HER OWN WORDS

Lindsey Baum:  Facebook Entry

TWILIGHT FREAK is happy that her brother is going to juvi tomorrow.Mood: happ at 14:10 17 Jun view more

Lindsey Baum is happy that her brother is going to juvie tomorrow.
Mood: Happ at 14:10 17 June

http://www.myspace.com/477760045






Most of the time my older brother and me got along but we had our days when we were young where we fought like cats and dogs. It doesn't mean we didn't love each other, because we did and we would have done anything for each other.


When we fought though...my poor parents were referees in our ongoing quest for supremacy over each other. I loved pushing his buttons and he loved pushing mine.

I remember tattling on him all the time just to try and get him in trouble. He would do the same to me. Me being the girl and being smaller, he got in trouble way more than I did. I used to relish him getting in trouble.

I used to write in my diary about how happy I was that John got grounded today because of such and such. I wish he would just run away from home. Often, I wasn't so tame in what I write. I didn't really want anything bad to happen to him deep down but I was 10. Kids say and do mean things to each other.

I see Lindsey's myspace words being no more than writing in a diary. She could have had a fight or a disagreement that day with her brother, was thinking of the court case that was happening that next day and wrote in her diary "I am happy that my brother is going to juvie tomorrow."



That's my opinion.



Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3
Post by: Lovinlife on August 02, 2009, 05:41:43 PM
I'm going to ask a stupid question, because I'm confused and you all probably know and can answer in a flash. 

Re: Lindsey's last confirmed sighting

Is the last confirmed sighting of Lindsey on Maple & Fifth Street?

TIA, Lovinlife


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3
Post by: KarmaRoundUp on August 02, 2009, 05:42:54 PM
okay I found out a couple of things. 

one -
The man seen walking into the PD with Melissa Baum, is her younger brother. He's been "cleared" and came to escort her through the waves of media that was there at that time. 


Thanks DD
I just wondered who he was,wasn't persecuting anyone.:)


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3
Post by: Tamikosmom on August 02, 2009, 05:59:26 PM
Thank you pink angel.

I stand by my position.

In the course of the investigation ... in the process of elimination ...

1.  I believe that all resident from 15th on Maple to the Baum residence should be considered persons of interest and questioned as well as the respective properties throughly searched.

2.  Considering the heated argument between Josh and Lindsey that dictated intervention  combined with other revealed dynamics encompassing the sibling relationship ... I believe Josh should be considered a person of interest.   

3.  Considering Wayne Watness connection to both Josh and Lindsey and ... the relation between his residence and the Baum residence ... I believe that this man should be a person of interest.

Janet

+++++++++++++++++

Expert: Missing girl likely went with someone she knew
09:58 PM PDT on Wednesday, July 1, 2009


A national expert helping in the search for 10-year-old Lindsey Baum says someone Lindsey knew might be responsible for her disappearance. Baum vanished while walking home from a friend’s house Friday around 9 p.m.

"Based on the information I have, it’s someone she possibly knows or is in the area, not outside the area," said Henry Schmidt, with the National Center for Missing and Exploited Children.
 
Schmidt, a retired sheriff from Wyoming, arrived in McCleary to assist with the search Sunday.

http://www.nwcn.com/statenews/washington/stories/NW_070109WAB-mccleary-KS.260ea8b9.html






Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3
Post by: Tracygirl on August 02, 2009, 06:02:02 PM
Janet not to be disrespectful or anything, but do you have siblings you grew up with?  Most people with siblings will tell you there are times you fight, it is natural. I take Lindseys words as being more teasing then anything else.

I was reading on the Adam Cambell thread. Interesting....



Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3
Post by: Tamikosmom on August 02, 2009, 06:06:39 PM
I'm going to ask a stupid question, because I'm confused and you all probably know and can answer in a flash. 

Re: Lindsey's last confirmed sighting

Is the last confirmed sighting of Lindsey on Maple & Fifth Street?

TIA, Lovinlife


Grays Harbor Undersheriff Rick Scott  

ABC News – June 30, 2009


Scott said witnesses were able to put Lindsey within a couple of blocks of her house just after 9:30 p.m. The last person reported to have seen her, he said, was a neighbor on her way to work.

http://abcnews.go.com/US/Story?id=7966924&page=2


Grays Harbor Undersheriff Rick Scott  

The Daily World - July 2, 2009


Scott said a second person came forward Tuesday with a confirmed sighting of Baum from Friday night in the same area along Maple Street near Fifth Street.

http://**/articles/2009/07/02/local_news/doc4a4cf43c1b1dd881132403




Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3
Post by: Rob on August 02, 2009, 06:08:11 PM
Thank you pink angel.

I stand by my position.

In the course of the investigation ... in the process of elimination ...

1.  I believe that all resident from 15th on Maple to the Baum residence should be considered persons of interest and questioned as well as the respective properties throughly searched.

2.  Considering the heated argument between Josh and Lindsey that dictated intervention  combined with other revealed dynamics encompassing the sibling relationship ... I believe Josh should be considered a person of interest.   

3.  Considering Wayne Watness connection to both Josh and Lindsey and ... the relation between his residence and the Baum residence ... I believe that this man should be a person of interest.

Janet

+++++++++++++++++

Expert: Missing girl likely went with someone she knew
09:58 PM PDT on Wednesday, July 1, 2009


A national expert helping in the search for 10-year-old Lindsey Baum says someone Lindsey knew might be responsible for her disappearance. Baum vanished while walking home from a friend’s house Friday around 9 p.m.

"Based on the information I have, it’s someone she possibly knows or is in the area, not outside the area," said Henry Schmidt, with the National Center for Missing and Exploited Children.
 
Schmidt, a retired sheriff from Wyoming, arrived in McCleary to assist with the search Sunday.

http://www.nwcn.com/statenews/washington/stories/NW_070109WAB-mccleary-KS.260ea8b9.html

Quote
1.  I believe that all resident from 15th on Maple to the Baum residence should be considered persons of interest and questioned as well as the respective properties throughly searched.

Janet, you know that the Constitution and the Bill of Rights prevent undue search and seizure. The residence MAY voluntarily submit, but no one can force anything on anyone without a search warrant signed by a judge based on compelling evidence.

Quote
2.  Considering the heated argument between Josh and Lindsey that dictated intervention  combined with other revealed dynamics encompassing the sibling relationship ... I believe Josh should be considered a person of interest.   

most here have brothers and sisters and did have fights and disagreements with them. I'm sure what constitutes a 'heated argument' between a 10 year old and a 12 year old? Certainly wouldn't rise to the level of never speaking again. These are a 10 year old and a 12 year old. I'm sure they loved each other. And Melissa is on the record saying that she is observing Josh's pain. 

Quote
3.  Considering Wayne Watness connection to both Josh and Lindsey and ... the relation between his residence and the Baum residence ... I believe that this man should be a person of interest.

I realize that there have been some high profile cases involving church members, but that alone should not skew our view of the majority of people involved in the church or give us a reason to look at them for that reason alone. In order to be a POI, there needs to be a real reason such as he was the last person seen with the missing person. Simply living in the neighborhood is not enough.

BTW - glad you are having a great summer and going to D-Land with the family and kids  ::MonkeyWink:: You'll have a great time!!


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3
Post by: Lovinlife on August 02, 2009, 06:11:11 PM
Thanks Janet.   ::MonkeyAngel::


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3
Post by: JessStar on August 02, 2009, 06:17:36 PM
I'm on mobile so I can't quote, but regarding MB's alleged inconsistent statements, I don't see them as inconsistent. I think she was speaking metaphorically, like words being stuck on the tip of your tongue. She was speaking about how she feels, not about where her daughter might be physically located. She feels like her daughter is standing right in front of her,yet she can't see her. It's symbolic of her frustration and pain over this.  I don't know if I am articulating this right because I've had a stressful day today-I hope I'm making sense.


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3
Post by: Sister on August 02, 2009, 06:19:31 PM
Tracygirl, Rob, Pink, DD, and others,
Ditto!!
Think about it!!!!! hmmmm a totally new concept!


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3
Post by: Tamikosmom on August 02, 2009, 06:20:39 PM
Janet not to be disrespectful or anything, but do you have siblings you grew up with?  Most people with siblings will tell you there are times you fight, it is natural. I take Lindseys words as being more teasing then anything else.

I was reading on the Adam Cambell thread. Interesting....



I have two younger brothers ... my daughter has four children between the ages of 6 and 11.  Tracygirl ... I know all about sibling rivalry but ... what has been revealed about the dynamics in Lindsey and Josh's relationship goes way beyond what I would consider typical.

IMO

Janet

++++++


mlachester 1 day ago wrote:

... And this is no nick name everyone in McCleary knows who I am. Its no big secret she had came to my house to call 911 when her brother had done things to her.

http://www.king5.com/topstories/stories/NW_063009WAB-Mccleary-girl-search-LJ.1fc0b759.html?ocp=2#slcgm_comments_anchor


mlachester 2 hours ago wrote:

I am close to her and I know a lot more than the media or law enforcement are saying right now. … Sorry if you don't like the truth but I have never been one to keep the truth in and she should of been taken the first time she called 911 from my house asking for help instead of put in a police car and taken back to her abuser!"

http://www.king5.com/topstories/stor...omments_anchor


mamahead 13 hours ago wrote:
 
Lindsey has been afraid of her brother for a very long time. He has threatned her many times. Where is she? And why is the mother not crazy with sadness or emotion. Show us some tears. The friend that Lindsey was last with shows more emotion than the mother. And why was the brother begging for money for fireworks at his little sisters candlelight vigil?

http://www.king5.com/topstories/stories/NW_070609WAB-missing-mccleary-girl-SW.14c01624.html


LINDSEY BAUM - IN HER OWN WORDS

Lindsey Baum:  Facebook Entry


TWILIGHT FREAK is happy that her brother is going to juvi tomorrow.Mood: happ at 14:10 17 Jun view more

Lindsey Baum is happy that her brother is going to juvie tomorrow.
Mood: Happ at 14:10 17 June

http://www.myspace.com/477760045





Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3
Post by: Tamikosmom on August 02, 2009, 06:26:54 PM
Rob ... in the process of elimination ... I cannot comprehend why ANYBODY would not cooperate with authorities in regards to questioning and searching of property when it is considered a little girl is missing.

If I lived in McCleary and ... the authorities arrived at my door and requested to search my residence and property.  I would step aside and ... instruct them to go for it!

I do not believe for a second if those residence and properties between 5th on Maple and the Baum residence have not been search ... it is because residents would not give permission.

Janet


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3
Post by: Tamikosmom on August 02, 2009, 06:27:47 PM
I am done!


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3
Post by: Sister on August 02, 2009, 06:31:10 PM
Janet, do you know which people refused to cooperate? what is your source? and not merely someone who obviously has a grudge against MB.


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3
Post by: Tracygirl on August 02, 2009, 06:33:33 PM
Janet,
Please explain your theory.


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3
Post by: Tracygirl on August 02, 2009, 06:35:16 PM
Tracygirl, Rob, Pink, DD, and others,
Ditto!!
Think about it!!!!! hmmmm a totally new concept!

This is me right now  :2brickwall: :gaah: :smt073


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3
Post by: KarmaRoundUp on August 02, 2009, 06:36:39 PM
Tracygirl, Rob, Pink, DD, and others,
Ditto!!
Think about it!!!!! hmmmm a totally new concept!
I find this insulting,I'm done too.


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3
Post by: Tracygirl on August 02, 2009, 06:43:24 PM
I am done!

Janet I think we are all reading what you are writing and not connecting the dots as you have. If you have a theory on HOW then please post it. Is this just a gut feeling or do you have more then a few postings from people we do not know the motives or if they are even the same person or two different people. I read their postings and found it suspect if they are involved to be honest. 


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3
Post by: klaasend on August 02, 2009, 06:44:10 PM
What the heck is going on here?


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3
Post by: Tamikosmom on August 02, 2009, 06:48:36 PM
Janet, do you know which people refused to cooperate? what is your source? and not merely someone who obviously has a grudge against MB.

I do not have a clue.  I would assume if approached cooperation would be where it was at if  there was nothing to hide.

I would hope ... in the course of the investigation ... that Maple Stree residents in that two block stretch, respective properties, Josh Baum and Wayne Watnee have been investigated and ruled out ... not disregarded.

However ... when it was revealed that other day that authorities were retracing their steps in the investigation and questioning residents who could not be contacted when Lindsey went missing ... it leads me to believe that their respective properties has yet to be searched.

Janet

++++++++


Police chase leads on missing McCleary girl
Updated: 07/30/09

 
Officers and volunteers knocked on doors throughout town Tuesday, asking new questions and trying to reach people missed in previous interviews, Scott said.

Two teams with cadaver search dogs also roamed the town, he said, but the hot conditions limited the available scents and quickly wore out the dogs.

http://www.thenewstribune.com/news/northwest/story/827963.html


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3
Post by: Tracygirl on August 02, 2009, 06:50:37 PM
Tracygirl, Rob, Pink, DD, and others,
Ditto!!
Think about it!!!!! hmmmm a totally new concept!
I find this insulting,I'm done too.

OMG this is childish. Come on everyone, stop it. If there is a reason to see Josh as a suspect, then please post more then a couple of quotes from posters we know nothing about in the respect of motives and also a fight he had with his sister.
Convince us of how he could have done this and gotten away with it for this long?


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3
Post by: KarmaRoundUp on August 02, 2009, 06:54:13 PM
Tracygirl, Rob, Pink, DD, and others,
Ditto!!
Think about it!!!!! hmmmm a totally new concept!
I find this insulting,I'm done too.

OMG this is childish. Come on everyone, stop it. If there is a reason to see Josh as a suspect, then please post more then a couple of quotes from posters we know nothing about in the respect of motives and also a fight he had with his sister.
Convince us of how he could have done this and gotten away with it for this long?
I really don't feel like explaining my opinions right now,maybe I'm just not grasping Sister's"think about it!!!!!!hmmmmm a totally new concept!!!!"
I guess I must be stupid?Dunno,I'll be reading and trying to learn all I can though.


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3
Post by: Lovinlife on August 02, 2009, 06:57:24 PM
OMG this is childish. Come on everyone, stop it. If there is a reason to see Josh as a suspect, then please post more then a couple of quotes from posters we know nothing about in the respect of motives and also a fight he had with his sister.
Convince us of how he could have done this and gotten away with it for this long?
I think it goes beyond JB. Some posters have been condescending to others for unfounded reasons. JMO

I agree, let's get back to finding Lindsey Baum.


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3
Post by: klaasend on August 02, 2009, 07:00:55 PM
Thank you pink angel.

I stand by my position.

In the course of the investigation ... in the process of elimination ...

1.  I believe that all resident from 15th on Maple to the Baum residence should be considered persons of interest and questioned as well as the respective properties throughly searched.

2.  Considering the heated argument between Josh and Lindsey that dictated intervention  combined with other revealed dynamics encompassing the sibling relationship ... I believe Josh should be considered a person of interest.   

3.  Considering Wayne Watness connection to both Josh and Lindsey and ... the relation between his residence and the Baum residence ... I believe that this man should be a person of interest.

Janet

+++++++++++++++++

Expert: Missing girl likely went with someone she knew
09:58 PM PDT on Wednesday, July 1, 2009


A national expert helping in the search for 10-year-old Lindsey Baum says someone Lindsey knew might be responsible for her disappearance. Baum vanished while walking home from a friend’s house Friday around 9 p.m.

"Based on the information I have, it’s someone she possibly knows or is in the area, not outside the area," said Henry Schmidt, with the National Center for Missing and Exploited Children.
 
Schmidt, a retired sheriff from Wyoming, arrived in McCleary to assist with the search Sunday.

http://www.nwcn.com/statenews/washington/stories/NW_070109WAB-mccleary-KS.260ea8b9.html






I don't see any problem with Janet's post above but I'm not reading more into it than what's there.  She's just saying that logically the people mentioned above should be considered persons on interest until proven otherwise.  She's not accusing anyone just saying what to her would be the logical place to start.

Personally, I think everyone from the time Lindsey left her house (with her brother) to the time she went missing, everyone inbetween should be persons of interest UNTIL PROVEN OTHERWISE.

Tensions run high in these missing persons cases and especially when the person has not been found. 


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3
Post by: Tracygirl on August 02, 2009, 07:03:25 PM
Lets assume those who love Lindsey are checking on this thread everyday hoping we all come up with some theory which leads them to Lindsey...When I first found Scared Monkeys I was searching for little Sandra Cantu and wanted to learn from you all where to look next. I wanted your opinions but I also wanted to know theories based on facts.   



Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3
Post by: Fanny Mae on August 02, 2009, 07:09:08 PM
In my view, searching the yards, and not inside the houses is an incomplete search. Do most houses there in McCleary have basements? Until they are throughly searched, along with the crawlspaces underneath, and in the attic areas, they have not done a thorough search job.

 Bodies have been sealed in containers, wrapped in blankets and stuffed in trunks for years without neighbors being suspicious. Deep freezers are the same. Bodies have been buried in unfinished basements. Think John Wayne Gacy. There were even police inside his home and didn't realize there were multiple bodies buried down there. But I believe a cadaver dog would have picked up on it.

Are the neighbors that live on the streets where Lindsay was know to be been unwilling for the LE to search their homes, or have the LE made no efforts to do so? 

BUMPED

I am bumping my own post from a day or two ago. I don't think this was ever addressed but this was my thought then, and still is my thought. I do not think it is very far from what Janet is trying to say.


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3
Post by: Fanny Mae on August 02, 2009, 07:13:32 PM
O/T JANET, ISLAND left you a post on the Billings thread. I hope you read it.   ::MonkeyAngel::


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3
Post by: no rose colored glasses on August 02, 2009, 07:15:18 PM
But to me the big question is why are some of the people not being that cooperative, and also I noticed that the towns people are not that willing to help, and even hardly come out to the vigil, the vigil did not have that many people. Why? Do they not like the family, or do they have something to hide, something they maybe doing inside their homes?


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3
Post by: Tracygirl on August 02, 2009, 07:17:07 PM
I am not sure how we would find out how has cooperated and who has not. What are the laws on police searching homes without a search warrant in the state of Washington? Do they just go in and see only what is on the surface or are they allowed to move things around? Can they bring dogs in or just do a visual sweep of the area?



Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3
Post by: Tamikosmom on August 02, 2009, 07:21:04 PM
DD

I speculate IF something happened to Lindsey at the hands of her brother ... it was completely unplanned.  I am not condoning but ... it could have been possibly provoked and ... he acted impulsively.  At twelve years old ... I believe this young man would have panicked and ... bolted.  In all probability ... no attempt or ... very little attempt at hiding his sister's body.  Maybe Lindsey was covered with debris or foilage.

I believe IF the above scenario took place ... Lindsey will be found in an out-of-sight spot on one of the properties in that two block radius.

Sheriff Scott stated in the search the other day ... that they were calling on neighbours again and requestioning them as well as neighbours who had yet to be contacted.  It does not appear that those properties were search to any extent ... only rural areas.

Also ... when it is considered what a resident said about Josh's behavior at that first vigil in regards to attempting to solicit money for the purchase of fireworks and ... KaraK's words about Josh's behavior at a search effort regarding Josh's only interest was in arranging a playdate with her son ... it appears that he does not comprehend that seriousness of the situation.  A lack of conscience can account for the fact there is no remorse.

DD ... I am only speculating.  Lindsey Baum is missing and ... something happened to her. 

Janet


BUMPED


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3
Post by: Tamikosmom on August 02, 2009, 07:22:11 PM
The flushing of the water and treatment systems could have masked the initial strench of body decomposition body.  However ... after over a month ... would there still be a decomposition order?

What if Lindsey's remains were not disposed of but ... are out of sight ... maybe covered with debris or foilage.  Maybe her remains are lying not far from where she was last observed two blocks from home by a family friend who was driving to work.  Maybe a thorough search with the dogs should be conducted by authorities on ALL properties in that two block stretch.

Remember Jessica Lundsford.  This little girl's remains were found on property within a stone throw from her home ... from the bed she was abducted from. 

Janet

+++++++

McCleary Water / Wastewater manages both the water system from the wells into homes and businesses and the sewer system that takes wastewater to the treatment plant.

WATER SYSTEM FLUSHING

June 22nd through July 2nd


The City crew will be flushing the water system using various fire hydrants around town, click on the link below to read the entire Public Notice and what to do in your area when the flushing takes place.

Hydrant flushing notice 

Wastewater Treatment

Water System

http://www.cityofmccleary.com/index.asp?Type=B_BASIC&SEC={CAF3B3FA-696A-4B0F-B441-C68ADF931009}


BUMPED


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3
Post by: Tamikosmom on August 02, 2009, 07:23:04 PM
DD

When all the underlying dynamic that has been revealed/alleged encompassing Josh Baum and ... then when you consider the argument that must of been so heated that it dictated  intervention by a neighbour ... logic dictates that Lindsey's brother should not be overlooked as a person of interest.  Hey ... maybe he has not been overlooked but ... the dots cannot be connected.  Think about the six searches conducted at the creek within days following Lindsey's disappearance.  Think about the recent search with the dogs.

I can only speculate on a possible scenerio and ... it involve a chance meeting between  Lindsey and a still angry Josh within two block from their home ... a chance meeting following Lindsey being observed at FiftH and Maple by a neighbor driving to work.  Then somewhere a short distance off the beaten track ... things go out of hand.   

Consideing Melissa Baum passed a lie detector test ... I do not believe she has any first hand knowledge of wrongdoing.

I saw a photo of Josh Baum at the second vigil a few nights ago.  He is a good size.

Again ... I am not accusing but ... when what is known about Josh and Lindsey's relationship that appears to reach beyond normal sibling rivalry ... I believe that her brother should not be overlooked as a person of interest.

Janet



BUMPED


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3
Post by: Tamikosmom on August 02, 2009, 07:24:50 PM
O/T JANET, ISLAND left you a post on the Billings thread. I hope you read it.   ::MonkeyAngel::


Thanks Fanny Mae

 ::MonkeyAngel::

Janet


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3
Post by: Fanny Mae on August 02, 2009, 07:27:53 PM
I am not sure how we would find out how has cooperated and who has not. What are the laws on police searching homes without a search warrant in the state of Washington? Do they just go in and see only what is on the surface or are they allowed to move things around? Can they bring dogs in or just do a visual sweep of the area?



I just keep thinking over and over about Jessica Lunsford. She was buried alive just yards from her own home several days after she came up missing. There seems to be no lessons learned in this case, even though it was thousands of miles from McCleary. If only they had gone inside with the search dogs. If only when they talked to the people at the door and they refused to let them come in they had gotten a search warrant to search. If only....There is no reason for someone to refuse to let the LE search unless they have something to hide. I think that refusal in any state would probably be a show cause for a search warrant. JMO


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3
Post by: Tamikosmom on August 02, 2009, 07:30:38 PM
Again ... it would be interesting to know what time Josh Baum got home on the evening of June 26, 2009.  Did he go home as the neighbour who intervened in the argument had instructed?  If he was at home with Mom prior to Lindsey's leaving the Kampen resident between 9:15 PM and 9:30 PM then this wannabe detective's speculation will go in another direction.

Janet


BUMPED


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3
Post by: MuffyBee on August 02, 2009, 07:31:56 PM
For what it's worth:  I just got off the phone with a special weapons and tactics law enforcement officer with 15 years experience and he trains others in his field.   He said one of the first things that would be done in an investigation in a missing person's case like Lindsey's would be to rule out those closest to the victim.  They would be looked at first and looked at closely.  That makes sense to me. 


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3
Post by: Sister on August 02, 2009, 07:38:11 PM
Island, sorry for the confusion.  I was quoting someone else's repeated statement and I should have actually quoted them.  I enjoy your posts.  Again, sorry for the confusion.


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3
Post by: MuffyBee on August 02, 2009, 07:39:50 PM
(http://bestsmileys.com/hugging/3.gif)


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3
Post by: Tracygirl on August 02, 2009, 07:40:48 PM
Muffybee that is what I would think.

Janet unless you can call the mom not sure if you can find out the detail what you are looking for in order to look at some other place.

Why do you believe the brother has not been ruled out? has there been a statement from LE stating they do not want too look at Josh? I am just trying to follow your thinking is all, not trying to be argumentative.


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3
Post by: Fanny Mae on August 02, 2009, 07:41:48 PM
For what it's worth:  I just got off the phone with a special weapons and tactics law enforcement officer with 15 years experience and he trains others in his field.   He said one of the first things that would be done in an investigation in a missing person's case like Lindsey's would be to rule out those closest to the victim.  They would be looked at first and looked at closely.  That makes sense to me. 

It makes sense to me too. But it appears that the most rudimentary things have not been done in Lindsay's case, as evidenced by the search by cadaver dogs in open areas and knocking on doors talking to people they have not been able to contact before over a month later. This ain't exactly a huge city. It's a little town in the middle of a forest, and way too laid back to have a child missing in their midst. JMO


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3
Post by: Tracygirl on August 02, 2009, 07:47:51 PM
Sorry about this.....If she is dead and was placed in a crawl space wouldn't there be a smell? I had a cat die under a house and my god you could smell it down the street.


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3
Post by: MuffyBee on August 02, 2009, 07:48:29 PM
For what it's worth:  I just got off the phone with a special weapons and tactics law enforcement officer with 15 years experience and he trains others in his field.   He said one of the first things that would be done in an investigation in a missing person's case like Lindsey's would be to rule out those closest to the victim.  They would be looked at first and looked at closely.  That makes sense to me. 

It makes sense to me too. But it appears that the most rudimentary things have not been done in Lindsay's case, as evidenced by the search by cadaver dogs in open areas and knocking on doors talking to people they have not been able to contact before over a month later. This ain't exactly a huge city. It's a little town in the middle of a forest, and way too laid back to have a child missing in their midst. JMO

I can see what you mean Fanny Mae.  In my area, we would have to have dogs and such brought in too, because we wouldn't have those kinds of resources here.  My area doesn't even have a city police department.  We have one deputy sheriff for every approx. 88 miles. And I know so many towns don't have highly trained personnel or budgets.  They would have to ask for help.  I hope Lindsey is able to be found. 


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3
Post by: Fanny Mae on August 02, 2009, 07:49:10 PM
Sorry about this.....If she is dead and was placed in a crawl space wouldn't there be a smell? I had a cat die under a house and my god you could smell it down the street.

Did anyone ever complain about the smell of MULTIPLE bodies buried in the crawl space of John Wayne Gayce's house in Chicago?


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3
Post by: no rose colored glasses on August 02, 2009, 07:55:39 PM
Sorry about this.....If she is dead and was placed in a crawl space wouldn't there be a smell? I had a cat die under a house and my god you could smell it down the street.

Did anyone ever complain about the smell of MULTIPLE bodies buried in the crawl space of John Wayne Gayce's house in Chicago?
Not that I was ever aware of, and I have read a bit about him. But remember even if there was a smell they were flushing the water system, and had said there would be a smell while they were doing that.


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3
Post by: Tracygirl on August 02, 2009, 07:56:51 PM
I don't know about that, did anyone complain about an odd smell?  I would assume most times if the body is just placed somewhere and there is access to air the smell would rise.


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3
Post by: Fanny Mae on August 02, 2009, 07:57:32 PM
For what it's worth:  I just got off the phone with a special weapons and tactics law enforcement officer with 15 years experience and he trains others in his field.   He said one of the first things that would be done in an investigation in a missing person's case like Lindsey's would be to rule out those closest to the victim.  They would be looked at first and looked at closely.  That makes sense to me. 

It makes sense to me too. But it appears that the most rudimentary things have not been done in Lindsay's case, as evidenced by the search by cadaver dogs in open areas and knocking on doors talking to people they have not been able to contact before over a month later. This ain't exactly a huge city. It's a little town in the middle of a forest, and way too laid back to have a child missing in their midst. JMO

I can see what you mean Fanny Mae.  In my area, we would have to have dogs and such brought in too, because we wouldn't have those kinds of resources here.  My area doesn't even have a city police department.  We have one deputy sheriff for every approx. 88 miles. And I know so many towns don't have highly trained personnel or budgets.  They would have to ask for help.  I hope Lindsey is able to be found. 

My point being, if they had asked for help, there were resources available, IF ONLY THE PD HAD ASKED, from the state and other large areas such as King County. As I understand it, the King Country search teams were not even there until just recently. The FBI has only provided a Assistant Special Agent who only responds to posters with form letter e-mails. I doubt if he is even in the area now. I am not sure, but I am guessing there is a huge district the FBI covers, anyway. If the local LE doesn't ask for help, none just come on their own.

I am thinking that maybe the Federal Attorney in the area should look into the handling of this case. It has been half-hearted at best. JMO


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3
Post by: Tracygirl on August 02, 2009, 08:00:57 PM
Sorry about this.....If she is dead and was placed in a crawl space wouldn't there be a smell? I had a cat die under a house and my god you could smell it down the street.

Did anyone ever complain about the smell of MULTIPLE bodies buried in the crawl space of John Wayne Gayce's house in Chicago?
Not that I was ever aware of, and I have read a bit about him. But remember even if there was a smell they were flushing the water system, and had said there would be a smell while they were doing that.
When did they flush the water system? The smell of a decaying body doesn't takes that long. (sorry about writing this..) I think it is within 24 to 48 hours when decomposing gets to this point.


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3
Post by: Fanny Mae on August 02, 2009, 08:01:51 PM
I don't know about that, did anyone complain about an odd smell?  I would assume most times if the body is just placed somewhere and there is access to air the smell would rise.

No, they did not. Read it and weep. He got away with it for years. Police had even been inside his house before.

http://www.crimemagazine.com/boykillergacy.htm



Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3
Post by: JessStar on August 02, 2009, 08:02:53 PM
Flushing the sewer system would have had no effect on the cadaver dogs. Human decomposition has a very unique, identifiable odor the dogs are trained to detect.

In my mind, the question of whether LE properly investigated things early on and whether JB is somehow involved in his sister's disappearance are two entirely different questions. To me, it still boils down to the two questions I posed earlier.


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3
Post by: no rose colored glasses on August 02, 2009, 08:03:17 PM
I don't know about that, did anyone complain about an odd smell?  I would assume most times if the body is just placed somewhere and there is access to air the smell would rise.
Klaas had posted that the city was flushing the water system, between this date and that date, sorry I can't remember exact dates, but it feel in the time that Lindsey was reported missing. And that there would be a smell. So if someone smelled something, they might have thought it was from that.


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3
Post by: no rose colored glasses on August 02, 2009, 08:04:34 PM
Flushing the sewer system would have had no effect on the cadaver dogs. Human decomposition has a very unique, identifiable odor the dogs are trained to detect.

In my mind, the question of whether LE properly investigated things early on and whether JB is somehow involved in his sister's disappearance are two entirely different questions. To me, it still boils down to the two questions I posed earlier.
I agree, what I was commenting on is if a resident smelled something they might have thought it was the sewer system, and not a decomposing body, just a thought.


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3
Post by: Fanny Mae on August 02, 2009, 08:05:33 PM
The flushing of the water and treatment systems could have masked the initial strench of body decomposition body.  However ... after over a month ... would there still be a decomposition order?

What if Lindsey's remains were not disposed of but ... are out of sight ... maybe covered with debris or foilage.  Maybe her remains are lying not far from where she was last observed two blocks from home by a family friend who was driving to work.  Maybe a thorough search with the dogs should be conducted by authorities on ALL properties in that two block stretch.

Remember Jessica Lundsford.  This little girl's remains were found on property within a stone throw from her home ... from the bed she was abducted from. 

Janet

+++++++

McCleary Water / Wastewater manages both the water system from the wells into homes and businesses and the sewer system that takes wastewater to the treatment plant.

WATER SYSTEM FLUSHING

June 22nd through July 2nd


The City crew will be flushing the water system using various fire hydrants around town, click on the link below to read the entire Public Notice and what to do in your area when the flushing takes place.

Hydrant flushing notice 

Wastewater Treatment

Water System

http://www.cityofmccleary.com/index.asp?Type=B_BASIC&SEC={CAF3B3FA-696A-4B0F-B441-C68ADF931009}


BUMPED

TracyGirl, I will bump this again. KLAAS posted this first a couple of weeks or so ago.


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3
Post by: Fanny Mae on August 02, 2009, 08:07:43 PM
Flushing the sewer system would have had no effect on the cadaver dogs. Human decomposition has a very unique, identifiable odor the dogs are trained to detect.

In my mind, the question of whether LE properly investigated things early on and whether JB is somehow involved in his sister's disappearance are two entirely different questions. To me, it still boils down to the two questions I posed earlier.

Do you know if CADAVER dogs were brought in when Lindsay first came up missing? I know there were search dogs, but were they Cadaver dogs?


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3
Post by: Rob on August 02, 2009, 08:09:00 PM
For what it's worth:  I just got off the phone with a special weapons and tactics law enforcement officer with 15 years experience and he trains others in his field.   He said one of the first things that would be done in an investigation in a missing person's case like Lindsey's would be to rule out those closest to the victim.  They would be looked at first and looked at closely.  That makes sense to me. 

thank you Muffy!!

In other words, as posted before, those closest to Lindsey have been ruled out, have taken polygraphs conducted by qualified individuals in their respect fields and the focus has shifts for those law enforcement officers.

As a side note, I have noticed that no family member has been asked to take a second or third poly as requested in Haleighs case. Law Enforcement is currently satisfied that NO family member is involved.

thanks again Muffy!


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3
Post by: Tracygirl on August 02, 2009, 08:09:29 PM
I recall reading about the case now. I wonder though since there were people activily looking for Lindsey, if that would make a difference in being able to spot a smell?

I don't recall if there are any farms around the McCleary area with animals? I was told the smell of a farm can cover a smell of a decaying body.


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3
Post by: Rob on August 02, 2009, 08:11:07 PM
For what it's worth:  I just got off the phone with a special weapons and tactics law enforcement officer with 15 years experience and he trains others in his field.   He said one of the first things that would be done in an investigation in a missing person's case like Lindsey's would be to rule out those closest to the victim.  They would be looked at first and looked at closely.  That makes sense to me. 

It makes sense to me too. But it appears that the most rudimentary things have not been done in Lindsay's case, as evidenced by the search by cadaver dogs in open areas and knocking on doors talking to people they have not been able to contact before over a month later. This ain't exactly a huge city. It's a little town in the middle of a forest, and way too laid back to have a child missing in their midst. JMO


quite common to re-examine the areas over again as bodies have been moved to previously searched areas. It's happened more than we can count.


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3
Post by: Sister on August 02, 2009, 08:11:41 PM
Sorry about this.....If she is dead and was placed in a crawl space wouldn't there be a smell? I had a cat die under a house and my god you could smell it down the street.

Did anyone ever complain about the smell of MULTIPLE bodies buried in the crawl space of John Wayne Gayce's house in Chicago?

http://www.trutv.com/library/crime/serial_killers/notorious/gacy/8b.html

some neighbors smelled a bad ordor -- but he was famous for giving parties, including bbqs -- police crawled under the house and thought the smell was sewage, etc.


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3
Post by: Tamikosmom on August 02, 2009, 08:11:51 PM
Muffybee that is what I would think.

Janet unless you can call the mom not sure if you can find out the detail what you are looking for in order to look at some other place.

Why do you believe the brother has not been ruled out? has there been a statement from LE stating they do not want too look at Josh? I am just trying to follow your thinking is all, not trying to be argumentative.

Tracygirl

The following statement by Sheriff Scott within four days of Lindsey's disappearance implies he considers the argument between Lindsey and Josh ... the argument that warranted intervention ... as insignificant.  I may have agree to a point if it were not for all the combined allegations that encompass the dynamics of Josh and Lindsey's relationship.

When all is said and done ... I do not know to what extent Josh Baum has been investigated any more than the potential "persons of interest" that DD and others are researching.  We are all armchair detectives working with what is out there ... not just pulling speculations out of thin air.  However ... much more info is required if the dots are going to be connected.

The truth will be revealed!  In the meantime "respectfully" agreeing to disagree with each other when there is a difference of opinion is where it is at.

Janet

++++++

Grays Harbor Undersheriff Rick Scott

The Olympian - June 30, 2009


Lindsey left her cell phone at home before leaving to play with friends Friday, said Grays Harbor Undersheriff Rick Scott. Lindsey’s older brother had left the Maple Street residence before his sister after the two had a dispute over the bike Lindsey had borrowed from him that day – a common occurrence between frequently squabbling siblings, Scott added.

http://www.theolympian.com/southsound/story/896613.html


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3
Post by: JessStar on August 02, 2009, 08:14:16 PM
I'm not sure when cadaver dogs were first brought in. But they were brought in. They would be capable of detecting decomp as long as it was present, which is for months after decomp begins. They can even detect decomp under water.


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3
Post by: Sister on August 02, 2009, 08:15:40 PM
Island, sorry for the confusion.  I was quoting someone else's repeated statement and I should have actually quoted them.  I enjoy your posts.  Again, sorry for the confusion.

Gracious, I meant to say KarmaR, sorry for the confusion.  Time for bed!
 :smt015


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3
Post by: Fanny Mae on August 02, 2009, 08:16:41 PM
For what it's worth:  I just got off the phone with a special weapons and tactics law enforcement officer with 15 years experience and he trains others in his field.   He said one of the first things that would be done in an investigation in a missing person's case like Lindsey's would be to rule out those closest to the victim.  They would be looked at first and looked at closely.  That makes sense to me. 

It makes sense to me too. But it appears that the most rudimentary things have not been done in Lindsay's case, as evidenced by the search by cadaver dogs in open areas and knocking on doors talking to people they have not been able to contact before over a month later. This ain't exactly a huge city. It's a little town in the middle of a forest, and way too laid back to have a child missing in their midst. JMO


quite common to re-examine the areas over again as bodies have been moved to previously searched areas. It's happened more than we can count.

Why did they wait a month to go back and talk to people they had not been able to contact when Lindsay came up missing?? And, have they checked the INSIDE of the houses along Lindsay's route home? Do we know that?


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3
Post by: Fanny Mae on August 02, 2009, 08:18:07 PM
I'm not sure when cadaver dogs were first brought in. But they were brought in. They would be capable of detecting decomp as long as it was present, which is for months after decomp begins. They can even detect decomp under water.

I can tell you that the first I heard of Cadaver dogs was last week, and they were looking in open fields, from the reports I have heard.


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3
Post by: Tracygirl on August 02, 2009, 08:20:28 PM
Janet I will agree to disagree but I do believe I was asking for more information on your theory, not necessarily disagreeing with you.

Here is a site that tells about decomposition. It is disgusting to read and there are pics of little piglets.  so be warned

http://www.7oaks.org/site/hcaverycomputerlab/file/Grade%207%20Science/Stages_of_DecompositionPiglet.pdf


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3
Post by: Fanny Mae on August 02, 2009, 08:24:24 PM
Janet I will agree to disagree but I do believe I was asking for more information on your theory, not necessarily disagreeing with you.

Here is a site that tells about decomposition. It is disgusting to read and there are pics of little piglets.  so be warned

http://www.7oaks.org/site/hcaverycomputerlab/file/Grade%207%20Science/Stages_of_DecompositionPiglet.pdf

TracyGirl, bodies are not alway lying out in the open. There are many ways to conceal them. I bumped a post of mine earlier. It comes not only from reading, but also from previous experience.


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3
Post by: A_News_Junkie_Monkey on August 02, 2009, 08:24:52 PM
For what it's worth:  I just got off the phone with a special weapons and tactics law enforcement officer with 15 years experience and he trains others in his field.   He said one of the first things that would be done in an investigation in a missing person's case like Lindsey's would be to rule out those closest to the victim.  They would be looked at first and looked at closely.  That makes sense to me. 

Can I add, I see a bunch of posters wanting every home searched, but the 4th amendment to the US Constitution prevents that while guarding citizens rights to and guards against unreasonable searches and seizures.  They can't just enter all the homes without just cause.


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3
Post by: Tamikosmom on August 02, 2009, 08:27:30 PM
Janet I will agree to disagree but I do believe I was asking for more information on your theory, not necessarily disagreeing with you.

Here is a site that tells about decomposition. It is disgusting to read and there are pics of little piglets.  so be warned

http://www.7oaks.org/site/hcaverycomputerlab/file/Grade%207%20Science/Stages_of_DecompositionPiglet.pdf

Tracygirl

I bumped three posts in the past couple of pages of this thread that explain what I believe may have happened as it pertains to Josh Baum.

You theories would be appreciated.

Janet


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3
Post by: no rose colored glasses on August 02, 2009, 08:30:12 PM
For what it's worth:  I just got off the phone with a special weapons and tactics law enforcement officer with 15 years experience and he trains others in his field.   He said one of the first things that would be done in an investigation in a missing person's case like Lindsey's would be to rule out those closest to the victim.  They would be looked at first and looked at closely.  That makes sense to me. 

Can I add, I see a bunch of posters wanting every home searched, but the 4th amendment to the US Constitution prevents that while guarding citizens rights to and guards against unreasonable searches and seizures.  They can't just enter all the homes without just cause.
Very, very true, I think also that even though a child is missing some people may be worried that LE might stumble onto somethings in their home which are questionable at best, and are afraid to allow LE into their home.


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3
Post by: Tamikosmom on August 02, 2009, 08:30:30 PM
Tracygirl, Rob, Pink, DD, and others,
Ditto!!
Think about it!!!!! hmmmm a totally new concept!

 ::MonkeyShocked::


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3
Post by: JessStar on August 02, 2009, 08:32:47 PM
Can I ask why we are discussing the decomp issue?  Is there a suggestion that JB was possibly capable of concealing a body in such a manner that it would be undetectable? Such as the way Gacy or Dahmer did?


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3
Post by: mamacrazy30 on August 02, 2009, 08:36:24 PM
i thank goodness everyday that there are folks (such as Scared Monkeys) that care about these situations.  These Children..the reason that we are here...  To figure out what is right and wrong..to help those in need, and to promote justice to victims...Everyone here has a voice and every voice needs to be heard....we are here for Lindsey...may every crook or craney be searched...that is what needs to be done...
please can we quit fighting..we are here for Lindsey...that is the focus...and that is why everyone is so heated...many have opinions and that is GOOD... We are here for Lindsey and that is.  We will all have different ideas and that is ok!  until we have some real info that is all we have. ::MonkeyAngel::


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3
Post by: no rose colored glasses on August 02, 2009, 08:37:03 PM
Can I ask why we are discussing the decomp issue?  Is there a suggestion that JB was possibly capable of concealing a body in such a manner that it would be undetectable? Such as the way Gacy or Dahmer did?
I can't speak for anyone else, I was just talking about the sewer system being flushed and about the odor that would be caused by that.


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3
Post by: Fanny Mae on August 02, 2009, 08:37:55 PM
For what it's worth:  I just got off the phone with a special weapons and tactics law enforcement officer with 15 years experience and he trains others in his field.   He said one of the first things that would be done in an investigation in a missing person's case like Lindsey's would be to rule out those closest to the victim.  They would be looked at first and looked at closely.  That makes sense to me. 

Can I add, I see a bunch of posters wanting every home searched, but the 4th amendment to the US Constitution prevents that while guarding citizens rights to and guards against unreasonable searches and seizures.  They can't just enter all the homes without just cause.

Well shoot. Let's just quit looking for Lindsay. Let's go back to looking up every SO from McCleary to Timbuctu!

You start at where the missing child was LAST SEEN, and you work out in circles. The inner circle HAS NOT been thoroughly searched yet IMO. It is only common sense. Refusing to let the LE look inside would raise red flags in almost every state and jurisdiction, and would cause most LE to take a closer look at why not. I have seen no evidence that the LE has even done that at all. This is just my opinion.


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3
Post by: no rose colored glasses on August 02, 2009, 08:40:10 PM
IMO I think valuable time was lost, thinking perhaps she was a runaway.


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3
Post by: JessStar on August 02, 2009, 08:44:25 PM
Fannie Mae- you have identified the issue that is at the heart of the 4th amendment's protection against unreasonable searches and seizures. Our Supreme Court has held that refusal to allow a search cannot be used alone as evidence to support a search warrant. There must be something more- something that raises the probability that a search will uncover evidence of a crime. I agree- it can raise a red flag. But fortunately or unfortunately, that's the law.


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3
Post by: pdh3 on August 02, 2009, 08:44:28 PM
Sorry about this.....If she is dead and was placed in a crawl space wouldn't there be a smell? I had a cat die under a house and my god you could smell it down the street.

Did anyone ever complain about the smell of MULTIPLE bodies buried in the crawl space of John Wayne Gayce's house in Chicago?

http://www.trutv.com/library/crime/serial_killers/notorious/gacy/8b.html

some neighbors smelled a bad ordor -- but he was famous for giving parties, including bbqs -- police crawled under the house and thought the smell was sewage, etc.





At one time during his dark days as a serial killer, Gacy was married. His wife and her child or children ( can't remember if the woman had more than one child) complained about the bad smell in the house. People did notice the smell, but he was able to explain it away. Apparently, no one ever thought about the possibility of bodies buried underneath the house until later.  He used lime to try and control the odor, but with that many burial sites, it was not enough to cover up the smell of decomposition.

In this informed day and age, I'd hope that people would be more suspicious of a terrible, persistent odor, and missing youngsters, than they were in John Wayne Gacy's time.....


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3
Post by: Fanny Mae on August 02, 2009, 08:45:00 PM
Can I ask why we are discussing the decomp issue?  Is there a suggestion that JB was possibly capable of concealing a body in such a manner that it would be undetectable? Such as the way Gacy or Dahmer did?

I am not necessarily hung up on JB. But I am saying there are ways to conceal a body and I do not think it has been thoroughly investigated. I have questions in my mind if the cadaver dogs last week were even taken to the retention pond for the water system spill-off, much less the other obvious places.

By this time the townspeople should be in an uproar over Lindsay being still missing. Why are they not??


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3
Post by: MuffyBee on August 02, 2009, 08:46:26 PM
http://www.komonews.com/news/49343017.html
Small town baffled, alarmed at 10-year-old girl's disappearance
Story Published: Jun 27, 2009 at 12:16 PM PDT
Story Updated: Jun 27, 2009 at 9:52 PM PDT
By Ray Lane and KOMO News Web Staff
MCCLEARY, Wash. - A wide-ranging search is under way for a 10-year-old girl who vanished Friday evening while walking home from a friend's house in this small town set amid forested hills west of Olympia. And now the entire town is worried.
Lindsey J. Baum was last seen at 9:15 p.m. Friday when she left her friend's home on Maple Street, where she had been visiting, said Dave Pimentel of the Grays Harbor County Sheriff's Office.

Lindsey was going to walk the four blocks to her home on Mommsen Road, which is roughly a 10-minute walk. But something happened in that short distance - Lindsey never arrived home.
"She hasn't been seen or heard from since," Pimentel said.
Her mother reported her missing at 10:50 p.m. And as the hours drag by with no sign of her, the girl's family fears she may have been taken by a stranger.

Search teams have been out looking for the girl, using bloodhounds. Sheriff's deputies, meanwhile, are calling people who live in the neighborhood and also are going door to door to see if anyone heard or saw anything.

Other searchers are combing the nearby woods on ATVs. Everyone is anxious for any sign of the missing girl.


Pimentel said Lindsey has never been a runaway. "We don't suspect that at this time," he said.

The girl's disappearance has shocked many residents of McCleary, population 1,550, where the biggest employer is a lumber mill that manufactures doors and people know their neighbors.

"We don't know what happened to her yet. All we know is she's missing, and we're taking every effort we can to try and locate her," he added.

Police say it appears Lindsey walked at least part of the way with home with friends, who didn't see anything unusual.

Melissa McCann, a family friend, said, "This is a small town. These things don't happen. And yet here they are. She comes from her friend's (house) a lot, so it doesn't make sense that she didn't show up at home. We're just baffled."

Pimentel said it's strange that nobody saw anything unusual.

"Such a small community like this - you can't do much in a town this size without everybody knowing about it," he said. "Everybody in town knows she's unaccounted for."

Lindsey's mother admits the 10-year old had been fighting with her brother in the moments before she was last seen, and that Lindsey is still upset about her parent's recent divorce.

But with every passing hour, there are mounting worries that the friendly girl who will talk with anybody is in serious trouble.

Lindsey was last seen wearing a gray hooded pullover sweatshirt, with blue jeans and black shoes. She stands about 4-feet-10-inches and weighs about 85 pounds.
**************************
I hope Lindsey is found soon. 


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3
Post by: crazybabyborg on August 02, 2009, 08:49:47 PM
IMO I think valuable time was lost, thinking perhaps she was a runaway.

That's my understanding too, NRCG.

I realize that unwarrented searches are illegal, and I certainly agree with the rights we have in protecting ourselves from that sort of invasion. Having said that, if police came to my door asking to take a look inside because there was a child missing, I'd fling the door wide open and say "excuse the mess, is there anything I can do to help?"

It might be interesting to see who reacted differently and why! Just sayin'........


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3
Post by: no rose colored glasses on August 02, 2009, 08:49:52 PM
Can I ask why we are discussing the decomp issue?  Is there a suggestion that JB was possibly capable of concealing a body in such a manner that it would be undetectable? Such as the way Gacy or Dahmer did?

I am not necessarily hung up on JB. But I am saying there are ways to conceal a body and I do not think it has been thoroughly investigated. I have questions in my mind if the cadaver dogs last week were even taken to the retention pond for the water system spill-off, much less the other obvious places.

By this time the townspeople should be in an uproar over Lindsay being still missing. Why are they not??
That is the question I would like to have answered. Either they don't care, they don't like Lindsey's family, they don't want their lives turned upside down with interference of LE. I don't know but it must be some good reason. I have asked on several occassions about how the towns people are acting over this, are their lives going on as before, are they suspicious of each other, and I have not read a reply, so I don't know.


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3
Post by: MuffyBee on August 02, 2009, 08:50:33 PM
http://scaredmonkeys.net/index.php?topic=5541.msg855570#msg855570

This is the very first post in Lindey's  thread started by Pink Angel.  Sometimes it is a good idea to go back from the start and read over things.  JMHO


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3
Post by: no rose colored glasses on August 02, 2009, 08:51:18 PM
IMO I think valuable time was lost, thinking perhaps she was a runaway.

That's my understanding too, NRCG.

I realize that unwarrented searches are illegal, and I certainly agree with the rights we have in protecting ourselves from that sort of invasion. Having said that, if police came to my door asking to take a look inside because there was a child missing, I'd fling the door wide open and say "excuse the mess, is there anything I can do to help?"

It might be interesting to see who reacted differently and why! Just sayin'........
I would do the same thing, but a lot of people are paranoid and especially paranoid about LE looking around inside their homes.


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3
Post by: Fanny Mae on August 02, 2009, 08:56:13 PM
Fannie Mae- you have identified the issue that is at the heart of the 4th amendment's protection against unreasonable searches and seizures. Our Supreme Court has held that refusal to allow a search cannot be used alone as evidence to support a search warrant. There must be something more- something that raises the probability that a search will uncover evidence of a crime. I agree- it can raise a red flag. But fortunately or unfortunately, that's the law.

I am aware of the 4th amendment issues, well aware. When a small child is missing in a small town, everyone is generally co-operative. We have seen this over and over. Even in Boise, where Robert Manwell is missing, they were able to get a search warrant on a "show cause" because as I read it he "knew the family" and his car had been reported stolen and returned. Not much to go on, but even he was co-operative.

Now back to Lindsay. Usually police will advise the residents they are looking for Lindsay and not for any illegal drugs or porn on their computer and they will comply. It happens every day. So why is it there are so many people in McCleary that have made themselves unavailible and uncooperative? And why hasn't the LE pushed??

Is there a vigil tonight for Lindsay? How many people are there?


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3
Post by: mamacrazy30 on August 02, 2009, 09:00:19 PM
IMO I think valuable time was lost, thinking perhaps she was a runaway.

That's my understanding too, NRCG.

I realize that unwarrented searches are illegal, and I certainly agree with the rights we have in protecting ourselves from that sort of invasion. Having said that, if police came to my door asking to take a look inside because there was a child missing, I'd fling the door wide open and say "excuse the mess, is there anything I can do to help?"

It might be interesting to see who reacted differently and why! Just sayin'........
::MonkeyCheer2:: :hockey: :cheers: :smt038 :2notworthy:


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3
Post by: Tamikosmom on August 02, 2009, 09:01:30 PM
Rob ... in the process of elimination ... I cannot comprehend why ANYBODY would not cooperate with authorities in regards to questioning and searching of property when it is considered a little girl is missing.

If I lived in McCleary and ... the authorities arrived at my door and requested to search my residence and property.  I would step aside and ... instruct them to go for it!

I do not believe for a second if those residence and properties between 5th on Maple and the Baum residence have not been search ... it is because residents would not give permission.

Janet

BUMPED


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3
Post by: rebelgirl901 on August 02, 2009, 09:03:03 PM
Rob ... in the process of elimination ... I cannot comprehend why ANYBODY would not cooperate with authorities in regards to questioning and searching of property when it is considered a little girl is missing.

If I lived in McCleary and ... the authorities arrived at my door and requested to search my residence and property.  I would step aside and ... instruct them to go for it!

I do not believe for a second if those residence and properties between 5th on Maple and the Baum residence have not been search ... it is because residents would not give permission.

Janet

It does happen, I know from experience.  For whatever reason sometimes people do not want their property searched.  We had a case here where a private plane crashed into a man's field and he would not give permission to l.e. to go on his property.  They had to get all the paperwork just to locate the missing plane and recover the pilot & his passengers. Very sad that someone would not cooperate with l.e. or search & rescue when it involved others lives.  I know it wasn't a little girl missing but the same holds true, some people just don't care. 

I don't know IF anyone refused to let l.e. search their property in Lindsey's case, I'm just saying it does happen.

My kids fight a lot and sometimes they say mean things to each other but I know that they love each other and are the first one's to stand up for the other one and protect them if necessary.  It's just kids and they know how to get on each others nerves and push buttons. 

Have a lovely evening.


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3
Post by: Fanny Mae on August 02, 2009, 09:03:08 PM
http://scaredmonkeys.net/index.php?topic=5541.msg855570#msg855570

This is the very first post in Lindey's  thread started by Pink Angel.  Sometimes it is a good idea to go back from the start and read over things.  JMHO

I have read here from the beginning. The truth is, I never from the beginning thought she was a runaway.  I just haven't posted much here, and as thing have gotten tense, maybe I shouldn't be posting now. It is frustrating to see the thread go so far afield when not even the basic things have been done, IMO.


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3
Post by: no rose colored glasses on August 02, 2009, 09:03:59 PM
Fannie Mae- you have identified the issue that is at the heart of the 4th amendment's protection against unreasonable searches and seizures. Our Supreme Court has held that refusal to allow a search cannot be used alone as evidence to support a search warrant. There must be something more- something that raises the probability that a search will uncover evidence of a crime. I agree- it can raise a red flag. But fortunately or unfortunately, that's the law.

I am aware of the 4th amendment issues, well aware. When a small child is missing in a small town, everyone is generally co-operative. We have seen this over and over. Even in Boise, where Robert Manwell is missing, they were able to get a search warrant on a "show cause" because as I read it he "knew the family" and his car had been reported stolen and returned. Not much to go on, but even he was co-operative.

Now back to Lindsay. Usually police will advise the residents they are looking for Lindsay and not for any illegal drugs or porn on their computer and they will comply. It happens every day. So why is it there are so many people in McCleary that have made themselves unavailible and uncooperative? And why hasn't the LE pushed??

Is there a vigil tonight for Lindsay? How many people are there?
It sure seems to me that not a lot of towns people are interested like they are in other cases, such as Robert and Sandra and Nevaeh. It just seems so, maybe if you live there it doesn't, but being from the outside looking in, that's the way it looks to me.


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3
Post by: no rose colored glasses on August 02, 2009, 09:05:02 PM
http://scaredmonkeys.net/index.php?topic=5541.msg855570#msg855570

This is the very first post in Lindey's  thread started by Pink Angel.  Sometimes it is a good idea to go back from the start and read over things.  JMHO

I have read here from the beginning. The truth is, I never from the beginning thought she was a runaway.  I just haven't posted much here, and as thing have gotten tense, maybe I shouldn't be posting now. It is frustrating to see the thread go so far afield when not even the basic things have been done, IMO.
I never thought she was a runaway either, that just made no sense to me at all.


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3
Post by: JessStar on August 02, 2009, 09:05:15 PM
In the Idaho case, they were able to secure a warrant because a search dog hit on the neighbor's suburban.  Anyway, I agree with you on the searches- I'd like to know who did and didn't consent. However, keep in mind that the 4th amendment is there to protect citizens from unreasonable, but also unscrupulous government- such as those that would plant evidence. It happens. Google the name "fred zane." Zane was head of west virginia's crime lab. For 12 years he falsified dna reports to obtain convictions.  Add to that the apparent community distrust, and the thought by some that someone from law enforcement may even be involved in lindsey's disappearance, and you get a pretty reasoable reason why some residents may be reluctant to open their doors to unbridled searches. Indeed, you might be opening the door to the perp him/her self.


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3
Post by: MuffyBee on August 02, 2009, 09:08:00 PM
http://scaredmonkeys.net/index.php?topic=5541.msg855570#msg855570

This is the very first post in Lindey's  thread started by Pink Angel.  Sometimes it is a good idea to go back from the start and read over things.  JMHO

I have read here from the beginning. The truth is, I never from the beginning thought she was a runaway.  I just haven't posted much here, and as thing have gotten tense, maybe I shouldn't be posting now. It is frustrating to see the thread go so far afield when not even the basic things have been done, IMO.

Fanny, I can tell from your posts you are really feeling the pain of Lindsey's disappearance.  I posted the first post by pink angel, because it does say they had blood hounds out and they were putting fliers out and they were going door to door.  But I don't know just how really, really well they searched, because I wasn't there.  I know it's frustrating.  I would open my door to let le search, or my car to look for a child.  But some don't or won't without a warrant and for that it must be probable cause, which you know.  When you said why aren't LE "pushing" well, we know LE can't push too much or they get in a lot of trouble, because citizens have rights that are protected under the law, which we both know.  And it's hard when there is a child missing.  I hope Lindsey can be found.   ::MonkeyAngel::


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3
Post by: AZSunny on August 02, 2009, 09:10:41 PM
Can I ask why we are discussing the decomp issue?  Is there a suggestion that JB was possibly capable of concealing a body in such a manner that it would be undetectable? Such as the way Gacy or Dahmer did?

I am not necessarily hung up on JB. But I am saying there are ways to conceal a body and I do not think it has been thoroughly investigated. I have questions in my mind if the cadaver dogs last week were even taken to the retention pond for the water system spill-off, much less the other obvious places.

By this time the townspeople should be in an uproar over Lindsay being still missing. Why are they not??

JessStar...a voice of reason!  There is in MY mind no way that JB was possibly capable of committing a murder and then concealing a body to this extent.  His mind does not reason that throughly!!

If you still want to research it, and find something we have may missed, go for it.  However, let's not let it be to the determint of all other good viable research that is going forward.    I am not sure what people are imagining as to the bad water smell.  It is an unpleasant order, but it is not permating the neighborhood.  We have frequent water flushes here when they open a new pipe, and it smells like sulfer when you hold a glass of water up to your nose, but the neighborhood certainly doesn't smell like that.  JMO 



Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3
Post by: Kat_Gram on August 02, 2009, 09:13:14 PM
I fell the same way about the searches going door to door.
There is a very small area between where she was last seen and her house.
I don't know why if LE came to the house doors and asked if they could look around the yard, crawl spaces etc specifically for her and had dogs with them, that a reasonable person would refuse.  We have different laws here in Canada and they do need probable cause to conduct a full blown search, but if they were just looking for Lindsey and found say drugs or stolen goods by happenstance, could any resulting charges be laid ?


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3
Post by: mamacrazy30 on August 02, 2009, 09:14:55 PM
Fannie Mae- you have identified the issue that is at the heart of the 4th amendment's protection against unreasonable searches and seizures. Our Supreme Court has held that refusal to allow a search cannot be used alone as evidence to support a search warrant. There must be something more- something that raises the probability that a search will uncover evidence of a crime. I agree- it can raise a red flag. But fortunately or unfortunately, that's the law.

I am aware of the 4th amendment issues, well aware. When a small child is missing in a small town, everyone is generally co-operative. We have seen this over and over. Even in Boise, where Robert Manwell is missing, they were able to get a search warrant on a "show cause" because as I read it he "knew the family" and his car had been reported stolen and returned. Not much to go on, but even he was co-operative.

Now back to Lindsay. Usually police will advise the residents they are looking for Lindsay and not for any illegal drugs or porn on their computer and they will comply. It happens every day. So why is it there are so many people in McCleary that have made themselves unavailible and uncooperative? And why hasn't the LE pushed??

Is there a vigil tonight for Lindsay? How many people are there?
It sure seems to me that not a lot of towns people are interested like they are in other cases, such as Robert and Sandra and Nevaeh. It just seems so, maybe if you live there it doesn't, but being from the outside looking in, that's the way it looks to me.
i feel ya'll there...it seems as though they just want it to go away...not that they don't care (who knows maybe they don't)  or maybe its just to big for them (town-folk, LE) to imagine??  at this point???  questions are all i have ::MonkeyConfused::


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3
Post by: JessStar on August 02, 2009, 09:16:12 PM
The answer to your question KatGram is yes. If you consent to a search, and they find evidence that a crime has been committed, you're as good as charged.


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3
Post by: Fanny Mae on August 02, 2009, 09:18:01 PM
http://scaredmonkeys.net/index.php?topic=5541.msg855570#msg855570

This is the very first post in Lindey's  thread started by Pink Angel.  Sometimes it is a good idea to go back from the start and read over things.  JMHO

I have read here from the beginning. The truth is, I never from the beginning thought she was a runaway.  I just haven't posted much here, and as thing have gotten tense, maybe I shouldn't be posting now. It is frustrating to see the thread go so far afield when not even the basic things have been done, IMO.

Fanny, I can tell from your posts you are really feeling the pain of Lindsey's disappearance.  I posted the first post by pink angel, because it does say they had blood hounds out and they were putting fliers out and they were going door to door.  But I don't know just how really, really well they searched, because I wasn't there.  I know it's frustrating.  I would open my door to let le search, or my car to look for a child.  But some don't or won't without a warrant and for that it must be probable cause, which you know.  When you said why aren't LE "pushing" well, we know LE can't push too much or they get in a lot of trouble, because citizens have rights that are protected under the law, which we both know.  And it's hard when there is a child missing.  I hope Lindsey can be found.   ::MonkeyAngel::

Actually, I am feeling the pain of the LE in the McCleary PD and the Grays County Sheriff's Office having not done their jobs. I do know of what I speak. The hot light of suspicion would be on anyone not cooperating, and this is not happening in this case.

Oh well, the townsfolk were able to carry on with their 4th of July celebration and parade, even though there was a child missing within a stone's throw of their celebration, and within days of their fine celebration. The mayor and commissioners were waving from their perches on their convertible cars, and life goes on in McCleary. Where's Lindsay, and who cares anyway? Therein lays my pain.


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3
Post by: JessStar on August 02, 2009, 09:19:52 PM
I gotta go. Good Nite fellow monkeys. God Bless You Lindsey- may tomorrow bring us good news, and bring you back safely to your family. We all care- which is why we spend time here-and sometimes get overly emotional.


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3
Post by: no rose colored glasses on August 02, 2009, 09:21:33 PM
I gotta go. Good Nite fellow monkeys. God Bless You Lindsey- may tomorrow bring us good news, and bring you back safely to your family. We all care- which is why we spend time here-and sometimes get overly emotional.
Have a good night  ::MonkeyAngel::


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3
Post by: MuffyBee on August 02, 2009, 09:23:56 PM
I gotta go. Good Nite fellow monkeys. God Bless You Lindsey- may tomorrow bring us good news, and bring you back safely to your family. We all care- which is why we spend time here-and sometimes get overly emotional.

Good night.


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3
Post by: A_News_Junkie_Monkey on August 02, 2009, 10:16:07 PM
Fannie Mae- you have identified the issue that is at the heart of the 4th amendment's protection against unreasonable searches and seizures. Our Supreme Court has held that refusal to allow a search cannot be used alone as evidence to support a search warrant. There must be something more- something that raises the probability that a search will uncover evidence of a crime. I agree- it can raise a red flag. But fortunately or unfortunately, that's the law.

Exactly - and refusing alone is not probable cause.  Fanny, I am not saying if it was my neighborhood I wouldn't let LE in my home - I would in a heartbeat.  I understand from an emotional point of view wanting everyone to be compliant, but LE can't demand entry and some might not be aware of the law.


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3
Post by: Nut44x4 on August 02, 2009, 10:17:54 PM
For what it's worth:  I just got off the phone with a special weapons and tactics law enforcement officer with 15 years experience and he trains others in his field.   He said one of the first things that would be done in an investigation in a missing person's case like Lindsey's would be to rule out those closest to the victim.  They would be looked at first and looked at closely.  That makes sense to me. 

Yep...that is a given!


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3
Post by: Fanny Mae on August 02, 2009, 10:28:02 PM
Fannie Mae- you have identified the issue that is at the heart of the 4th amendment's protection against unreasonable searches and seizures. Our Supreme Court has held that refusal to allow a search cannot be used alone as evidence to support a search warrant. There must be something more- something that raises the probability that a search will uncover evidence of a crime. I agree- it can raise a red flag. But fortunately or unfortunately, that's the law.

Exactly - and refusing alone is not probable cause.  Fanny, I am not saying if it was my neighborhood I wouldn't let LE in my home - I would in a heartbeat.  I understand from an emotional point of view wanting everyone to be compliant, but LE can't demand entry and some might not be aware of the law.

I see no evidence that the McCleary PD or the Grays County Sheriff's office ever even made the effort. Does it look like to you that they did?


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3
Post by: Kat_Gram on August 02, 2009, 10:28:07 PM
The answer to your question KatGram is yes. If you consent to a search, and they find evidence that a crime has been committed, you're as good as charged.
ty JessStar


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3
Post by: Fanny Mae on August 02, 2009, 10:35:54 PM
The answer to your question KatGram is yes. If you consent to a search, and they find evidence that a crime has been committed, you're as good as charged.
ty JessStar

Except if the agreement is made before that they look they will only look for evidence of Lindsay, it can be done.


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3
Post by: Fanny Mae on August 02, 2009, 10:46:48 PM
The answer to your question KatGram is yes. If you consent to a search, and they find evidence that a crime has been committed, you're as good as charged.
ty JessStar

Except if the agreement is made before that they look they will only look for evidence of Lindsay, it can be done.

To clarify, oftentimes in these kinds of searches, they will take along a DA, or City Attorney, that will assure the residents that nothing else will be held against them if they will allow a search. A person can call their own attorney to be present if this is the case. It happens every day.

I know the lawyer type can tell you otherwise, and quote the exact law and bible and verse. In a practical matter, things happen everyday that just go on and never get even brought to the surface. That is the matter of fact with LE, especially when a child that the LE really wants to find. Maybe they just don't want to find her. It appears that way to me for many reasons. JMO


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3
Post by: Tamikosmom on August 02, 2009, 10:47:11 PM
Fannie Mae- you have identified the issue that is at the heart of the 4th amendment's protection against unreasonable searches and seizures. Our Supreme Court has held that refusal to allow a search cannot be used alone as evidence to support a search warrant. There must be something more- something that raises the probability that a search will uncover evidence of a crime. I agree- it can raise a red flag. But fortunately or unfortunately, that's the law.

Exactly - and refusing alone is not probable cause.  Fanny, I am not saying if it was my neighborhood I wouldn't let LE in my home - I would in a heartbeat.  I understand from an emotional point of view wanting everyone to be compliant, but LE can't demand entry and some might not be aware of the law.

I see no evidence that the McCleary PD or the Grays County Sheriff's office ever even made the effort. Does it look like to you that they did?

I agree. 

 ::MonkeyNoNo::

Hopefully ... there is stuff going onbehind the scenes.

Good Night Fanny Mae!  Good Night Monkeys!

Janet
7:45 PM PT


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3
Post by: A_News_Junkie_Monkey on August 02, 2009, 10:48:19 PM
Fannie Mae- you have identified the issue that is at the heart of the 4th amendment's protection against unreasonable searches and seizures. Our Supreme Court has held that refusal to allow a search cannot be used alone as evidence to support a search warrant. There must be something more- something that raises the probability that a search will uncover evidence of a crime. I agree- it can raise a red flag. But fortunately or unfortunately, that's the law.

Exactly - and refusing alone is not probable cause.  Fanny, I am not saying if it was my neighborhood I wouldn't let LE in my home - I would in a heartbeat.  I understand from an emotional point of view wanting everyone to be compliant, but LE can't demand entry and some might not be aware of the law.

I see no evidence that the McCleary PD or the Grays County Sheriff's office ever even made the effort. Does it look like to you that they did?

Just that they went door to door asking and did the same again last week according to news reports.  I am 3000 miles away, so I can only go on the news reports.  I know they only have three officers and 6 cop cars on their force.  I have seen things brought forward that have my hinky meter wondering if LE or someone close to them is involved or involved after the fact, but otherwise - I know only what I have read, no first hand knowledge.  I know someone who has spoken to them and they have said they felt their information was taken serious and with due respect. 
Unfortunately, NG and Gretta are not there on the ground - then we might have more news footage showing if the streets are bare, being searched or what.  I know it is hard to feel so deeply that more can and should be done - I am not trying to aggravate you, but the law is the law.  People smoke pot - and they are more worried about getting hauled in for their stash than a child.  There are reasons other than guilt for people to refuse a search.  Do I personally, morally agree that there is anything more important than the safety of child - hell no.  But, I will try my best not to let my frustration with the case from keeping me from getting into spats with fellow monkeys who really just want what I want - Lindsay found and brought home. 
In the end this and all we do is not about being right - it is about the children.  Good night, fellow monkeys.


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3
Post by: Fanny Mae on August 02, 2009, 10:49:12 PM
And to clarify on the Boise case, the dog hit on the Suburban in the DRIVEWAY on Mr. Wallis' property, AFTER the search warrant was issued. IIRC


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3
Post by: A_News_Junkie_Monkey on August 02, 2009, 10:50:58 PM
The answer to your question KatGram is yes. If you consent to a search, and they find evidence that a crime has been committed, you're as good as charged.
ty JessStar

Except if the agreement is made before that they look they will only look for evidence of Lindsay, it can be done.

To clarify, oftentimes in these kinds of searches, they will take along a DA, or City Attorney, that will assure the residents that nothing else will be held against them if they will allow a search. A person can call their own attorney to be present if this is the case. It happens every day.

I know the lawyer type can tell you otherwise, and quote the exact law and bible and verse. In a practical matter, things happen everyday that just go on and never get even brought to the surface. That is the matter of fact with LE, especially when a child that the LE really wants to find. Maybe they just don't want to find her. It appears that way to me for many reasons. JMO

I have never heard of the DA or SA or a city attorney going door to door offering immunity to search for one crime only.  Can you link me to some cases of this? 


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3
Post by: Fanny Mae on August 02, 2009, 10:55:16 PM
Fannie Mae- you have identified the issue that is at the heart of the 4th amendment's protection against unreasonable searches and seizures. Our Supreme Court has held that refusal to allow a search cannot be used alone as evidence to support a search warrant. There must be something more- something that raises the probability that a search will uncover evidence of a crime. I agree- it can raise a red flag. But fortunately or unfortunately, that's the law.

Exactly - and refusing alone is not probable cause.  Fanny, I am not saying if it was my neighborhood I wouldn't let LE in my home - I would in a heartbeat.  I understand from an emotional point of view wanting everyone to be compliant, but LE can't demand entry and some might not be aware of the law.

I see no evidence that the McCleary PD or the Grays County Sheriff's office ever even made the effort. Does it look like to you that they did?

Just that they went door to door asking and did the same again last week according to news reports.  I am 3000 miles away, so I can only go on the news reports.  I know they only have three officers and 6 cop cars on their force.  I have seen things brought forward that have my hinky meter wondering if LE or someone close to them is involved or involved after the fact, but otherwise - I know only what I have read, no first hand knowledge.  I know someone who has spoken to them and they have said they felt their information was taken serious and with due respect. 
Unfortunately, NG and Gretta are not there on the ground - then we might have more news footage showing if the streets are bare, being searched or what.  I know it is hard to feel so deeply that more can and should be done - I am not trying to aggravate you, but the law is the law.  People smoke pot - and they are more worried about getting hauled in for their stash than a child.  There are reasons other than guilt for people to refuse a search.  Do I personally, morally agree that there is anything more important than the safety of child - hell no.  But, I will try my best not to let my frustration with the case from keeping me from getting into spats with fellow monkeys who really just want what I want - Lindsay found and brought home. 
In the end this and all we do is not about being right - it is about the children.  Good night, fellow monkeys.

I did not think I was getting into "spats with fellow monkeys." I thought I was stating my opinion as I see it. You know me and who I am.  I am not trying to be right. I am trying to figure out why Lindsay is not home in her bed right now. I just don't feel that the basics have been done here, and I feel that life is going on like Lindsay was never there.

Do I care?? You bet. Am I trying to make enemies, NO! I just think the investigation of her being missing and probably dead has gone far afield, and wonder why the right questions have not been demanded from the right people.


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3
Post by: Fanny Mae on August 02, 2009, 10:58:14 PM
The answer to your question KatGram is yes. If you consent to a search, and they find evidence that a crime has been committed, you're as good as charged.
ty JessStar

Except if the agreement is made before that they look they will only look for evidence of Lindsay, it can be done.

To clarify, oftentimes in these kinds of searches, they will take along a DA, or City Attorney, that will assure the residents that nothing else will be held against them if they will allow a search. A person can call their own attorney to be present if this is the case. It happens every day.

I know the lawyer type can tell you otherwise, and quote the exact law and bible and verse. In a practical matter, things happen everyday that just go on and never get even brought to the surface. That is the matter of fact with LE, especially when a child that the LE really wants to find. Maybe they just don't want to find her. It appears that way to me for many reasons. JMO

I have never heard of the DA or SA or a city attorney going door to door offering immunity to search for one crime only.  Can you link me to some cases of this? 

I can tell you that I have personal knowledge of the DA and his assistant going out on criminal cases when they needed certain info and assisting in the investigation with certain agreements being made in advance. If I gave you a link, I would have to kill you.  ::MonkeyDevil2::


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3
Post by: Tamikosmom on August 02, 2009, 11:05:00 PM
Fannie Mae- you have identified the issue that is at the heart of the 4th amendment's protection against unreasonable searches and seizures. Our Supreme Court has held that refusal to allow a search cannot be used alone as evidence to support a search warrant. There must be something more- something that raises the probability that a search will uncover evidence of a crime. I agree- it can raise a red flag. But fortunately or unfortunately, that's the law.

Exactly - and refusing alone is not probable cause.  Fanny, I am not saying if it was my neighborhood I wouldn't let LE in my home - I would in a heartbeat.  I understand from an emotional point of view wanting everyone to be compliant, but LE can't demand entry and some might not be aware of the law.

I see no evidence that the McCleary PD or the Grays County Sheriff's office ever even made the effort. Does it look like to you that they did?

Just that they went door to door asking and did the same again last week according to news reports.  I am 3000 miles away, so I can only go on the news reports.  I know they only have three officers and 6 cop cars on their force.  I have seen things brought forward that have my hinky meter wondering if LE or someone close to them is involved or involved after the fact, but otherwise - I know only what I have read, no first hand knowledge.  I know someone who has spoken to them and they have said they felt their information was taken serious and with due respect. 
Unfortunately, NG and Gretta are not there on the ground - then we might have more news footage showing if the streets are bare, being searched or what.  I know it is hard to feel so deeply that more can and should be done - I am not trying to aggravate you, but the law is the law.  People smoke pot - and they are more worried about getting hauled in for their stash than a child.  There are reasons other than guilt for people to refuse a search.  Do I personally, morally agree that there is anything more important than the safety of child - hell no.  But, I will try my best not to let my frustration with the case from keeping me from getting into spats with fellow monkeys who really just want what I want - Lindsay found and brought home. 
In the end this and all we do is not about being right - it is about the children.  Good night, fellow monkeys.

I did not think I was getting into "spats with fellow monkeys." I thought I was stating my opinion as I see it. You know me and who I am.  I am not trying to be right. I am trying to figure out why Lindsay is not home in her bed right now. I just don't feel that the basics have been done here, and I feel that life is going on like Lindsay was never there.

Do I care?? You bet. Am I trying to make enemies, NO! I just think the investigation of her being missing and probably dead has gone far afield, and wonder why the right questions have not been demanded from the right people.

 ::MonkeyDance::


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3
Post by: Rob on August 02, 2009, 11:53:51 PM
Rob ... in the process of elimination ... I cannot comprehend why ANYBODY would not cooperate with authorities in regards to questioning and searching of property when it is considered a little girl is missing.

If I lived in McCleary and ... the authorities arrived at my door and requested to search my residence and property.  I would step aside and ... instruct them to go for it!

I do not believe for a second if those residence and properties between 5th on Maple and the Baum residence have not been search ... it is because residents would not give permission.

Janet
BUMPED

Janet, I don't ignore your posts. It's just that we have known each other on three boards for so long that I think you probably know that I am a Constitutionalist, (and where I stand on a blanket wide search), as are you. I know that you are Canadian and live your own personal life as if you had these same rights and guarantees. It's part of God's plan for man and woman to be free and those rights are guaranteed by God, not a government. These right are universal and not unique to only America.

I want Lindsey found, just as everyone else does. And just as you may not comprehend why anyone may or may not have a valid or invalid reason for opening their doors - I understand... you're not a criminal. There are many others that are not involved with Lindsey's disappearance, but maybe have a pot farm in the basement or betting slips all over the living room from a bookmaking operation.

All that said, we can't go kicking in doors - that's Germany 1934, Poland 1939, Czechoslovakia 1939-40... we don't allow that and live with-in the Framework. The question is - where is the balance? When a child is missing there needs to be some understanding that a pot farmer is not going to face charges if he cooperates, same for the bookmaker. The LE asked for cooperation and have received a fair amount, but not a total amount, given the article stating that the have went back and talked to people missed the first time through.

I would love to see all the residences open their doors and from what I have read many have and allowed their property to be searched.

BTW - when we don't live with-in the Framework - Japanese interment camps are a possibility under the guise of a common good. I'm sure you understand what I am saying.



Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3
Post by: Tamikosmom on August 03, 2009, 12:00:15 AM
Tamikosmom, doubledecker, Treehouse, Rob, KaraK and 8 Guests are viewing this topic.


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3
Post by: Tamikosmom on August 03, 2009, 12:06:50 AM
Rob

I never implied that any constitutional rights should be violated.  I just wanted to know if an attempt was made by LE to get permission from each resident in that two block stretch to search homes and property.  I believe that maybe Lindsey had an encounter on that stretch ... not necessarily a homeowner and ... her body is lying on one of these properties out of sight ... maybe covered with debris or foilage.

Janet



Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3
Post by: Rob on August 03, 2009, 12:12:48 AM
Rob

I never implied that any constitutional rights should be violated.  I just wanted to know if an attempt was made by LE to get permission from each resident in that two block stretch to search homes and property.  I believe that maybe Lindsey had an encounter on that stretch ... not necessarily a homeowner and ... her body is lying on one of these properties out of sight ... maybe covered with debris or foilage.

Janet



highly doubtful her body is lying around one of these homes. The dogs would have pulled a handler directly to it. A dog leading a handler to a property is probably cause for a search... as in a drug bust where drugs are concealed with in a vehicle.

That's different then a body being concealed in a home or in a freezer. A dog would probably have a hard time smelling a cadaver in a freezer in a basement - and likewise hidden in a house unless the windows were open or you had a very very good dog. However, a cadaver dog can smell decaying flesh for quite some distance - and - it's a considerable factor that even hidden in a house - a body could be detected by a dog in the vicinity.


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3
Post by: Treehouse on August 03, 2009, 12:13:53 AM
Tamikosmom, doubledecker, Treehouse, Rob, KaraK and 8 Guests are viewing this topic.

Treehouse, Rob, Gizzie, Tamikosmom, doubledecker and 7 Guests are viewing this topic.

Hello all.

I confess to being a binge monkey these days. Work prevents me from following daily, so when I get a stretch of time, I go back and read for hours. Seldom do I catch up enough to comment.

Today is the first that I've read about Lindsey. She is now in my thoughts and prayers.

And now, it is time to turn my thoughts to work again.

Have a good evening.


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3
Post by: A_News_Junkie_Monkey on August 03, 2009, 12:14:19 AM
Tamikosmom, doubledecker, Treehouse, Rob, KaraK and 8 Guests are viewing this topic.


What is the point?  Am I missing something?  Or is this a hi?

On the issue of folks refusing to allow a search, it is not always illegal activity that causes people to say no.  Sometime they are worried their house is so dirty that CPS will be called in - to determine the fitness of the home.  Sometimes they have 14 cats and don't want the city telling them how many cats are too many.  Some just don't want to get involved.  I am not saying that is right, but it is what it is - it is their right by law. 
Is there reason to believe that the newspapers in that area are reporting door to door and going back to ask ones who were missed if they can look for the child - is there reason to believe they are reporting this in error on purpose?


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3
Post by: Tamikosmom on August 03, 2009, 12:15:51 AM
Rob

I never implied that any constitutional rights should be violated.  I just wanted to know if an attempt was made by LE to get permission from each resident in that two block stretch to search homes and property.  I believe that maybe Lindsey had an encounter on that stretch ... not necessarily a homeowner and ... her body is lying on one of these properties out of sight ... maybe covered with debris or foilage.

Janet



highly doubtful her body is lying around one of these homes. The dogs would have pulled a handler directly to it. A dog leading a handler to a property is probably cause for a search... as in a drug bust where drugs are concealed with in a vehicle.

That's different then a body being concealed in a home or in a freezer. A dog would probably have a hard time smelling a cadaver in a freezer in a basement - and likewise hidden in a house unless the windows were open or you had a very very good dog. However, a cadaver dog can smell decaying flesh for quite some distance - and - it's a considerable factor that even hidden in a house - a body could be detected by a dog in the vicinity.

Rob

That is what I want to know.  Has those properties been searched by LE ... by dogs.

Janet


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3
Post by: Tamikosmom on August 03, 2009, 12:21:06 AM
Think about precious little Jessica Lunsford.  Stuffed alive in a plastic bag ... buried less than 2 feet from the surface ... a stone throw from her home ... from the bedroom where she was abducted.  She was not recovered for weeks and ... it was suspicion that brought LE back to that trailer.  The first time LE was there ... it was determined she was still alive in a back room.  No search was done at that time.

Janet


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3
Post by: Fanny Mae on August 03, 2009, 12:23:27 AM
I see KaraK is in the rafters watching, so I am wondering if she can answer any of our questions? I do not see the point of pointing out who each of the posters are so I will not. I have just been reading along and know that some think I am wrong for my stance on the McCleary PD and the Grays County Sheriff's office. I wonder if Karak can answer my questions.


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3
Post by: Tamikosmom on August 03, 2009, 12:23:31 AM
DD

I speculate IF something happened to Lindsey at the hands of her brother ... it was completely unplanned.  I am not condoning but ... it could have been possibly provoked and ... he acted impulsively.  At twelve years old ... I believe this young man would have panicked and ... bolted.  In all probability ... no attempt or ... very little attempt at hiding his sister's body.  Maybe Lindsey was covered with debris or foilage.

I believe IF the above scenario took place ... Lindsey will be found in an out-of-sight spot on one of the properties in that two block radius.

Sheriff Scott stated in the search the other day ... that they were calling on neighbours again and requestioning them as well as neighbours who had yet to be contacted.  It does not appear that those properties were search to any extent ... only rural areas.

Also ... when it is considered what a resident said about Josh's behavior at that first vigil in regards to attempting to solicit money for the purchase of fireworks and ... KaraK's words about Josh's behavior at a search effort regarding Josh's only interest was in arranging a playdate with her son ... it appears that he does not comprehend that seriousness of the situation.  A lack of conscience can account for the fact there is no remorse.

DD ... I am only speculating.  Lindsey Baum is missing and ... something happened to her. 

Janet


BUMPED


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3
Post by: Tamikosmom on August 03, 2009, 12:24:18 AM
The flushing of the water and treatment systems could have masked the initial strench of body decomposition body.  However ... after over a month ... would there still be a decomposition order?

What if Lindsey's remains were not disposed of but ... are out of sight ... maybe covered with debris or foilage.  Maybe her remains are lying not far from where she was last observed two blocks from home by a family friend who was driving to work.  Maybe a thorough search with the dogs should be conducted by authorities on ALL properties in that two block stretch.

Remember Jessica Lundsford.  This little girl's remains were found on property within a stone throw from her home ... from the bed she was abducted from. 

Janet

+++++++

McCleary Water / Wastewater manages both the water system from the wells into homes and businesses and the sewer system that takes wastewater to the treatment plant.

WATER SYSTEM FLUSHING

June 22nd through July 2nd


The City crew will be flushing the water system using various fire hydrants around town, click on the link below to read the entire Public Notice and what to do in your area when the flushing takes place.

Hydrant flushing notice 

Wastewater Treatment

Water System

http://www.cityofmccleary.com/index.asp?Type=B_BASIC&SEC={CAF3B3FA-696A-4B0F-B441-C68ADF931009}


BUMPED


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3
Post by: Tamikosmom on August 03, 2009, 12:24:50 AM
DD

When all the underlying dynamic that has been revealed/alleged encompassing Josh Baum and ... then when you consider the argument that must of been so heated that it dictated  intervention by a neighbour ... logic dictates that Lindsey's brother should not be overlooked as a person of interest.  Hey ... maybe he has not been overlooked but ... the dots cannot be connected.  Think about the six searches conducted at the creek within days following Lindsey's disappearance.  Think about the recent search with the dogs.

I can only speculate on a possible scenerio and ... it involve a chance meeting between  Lindsey and a still angry Josh within two block from their home ... a chance meeting following Lindsey being observed at FiftH and Maple by a neighbor driving to work.  Then somewhere a short distance off the beaten track ... things go out of hand.   

Consideing Melissa Baum passed a lie detector test ... I do not believe she has any first hand knowledge of wrongdoing.

I saw a photo of Josh Baum at the second vigil a few nights ago.  He is a good size.

Again ... I am not accusing but ... when what is known about Josh and Lindsey's relationship that appears to reach beyond normal sibling rivalry ... I believe that her brother should not be overlooked as a person of interest.

Janet



BUMPED


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3
Post by: Tamikosmom on August 03, 2009, 12:25:17 AM
Again ... it would be interesting to know what time Josh Baum got home on the evening of June 26, 2009.  Did he go home as the neighbour who intervened in the argument had instructed?  If he was at home with Mom prior to Lindsey's leaving the Kampen resident between 9:15 PM and 9:30 PM then this wannabe detective's speculation will go in another direction.

Janet


BUMPED


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3
Post by: Tamikosmom on August 03, 2009, 12:27:44 AM
Kara

what time did Josh Baum arrive home on the evening that his sister went missing.

Thanks

Janet


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3
Post by: pink angel on August 03, 2009, 12:45:15 AM
Janet,

KaraK may be lurking and reading but she has made a personal decision not to post on any more forums regarding Lindsey. So sadly, I doubt your question(s) will be answered unless another local can answer them or someone can get Sheriff Scott on the line.    ::MonkeyWink::


http://www.gratefulness.org/candles/candles.cfm?l=eng&gi=FLB

Lighting a candle and saying a prayer for Lindsey. May she found soon. It's been FAR too long.

 ::MonkeyAngel::


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3
Post by: Tamikosmom on August 03, 2009, 12:48:04 AM
Thank you pink angel.

Good Night All.

Janet
9:50 PM PT


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3
Post by: Fanny Mae on August 03, 2009, 12:49:08 AM
ANJ, do you only see thing in black or white, and think there are no shades of grey? The law says one thing, but do you not think there is ever a case of a little fudging either way? I feel that you must study law, and know how it is written. I respect that. But in reality, there really are some shades of grey.

I am offended when someone makes a blanket statement and then leaves and goes off to another thread or just logs off. I am not speaking of you in this case, ANJ. Like I said before, you know me and knows who I am and why I feel the way I do. Basicially, I am a constitutionalist too. But I am a realist, and know that the constitution is streched way out of shape frequently. Sometimes for the good, sometimes for the worst. Lately it seems, it has really been way for the worst.

It still does not change the fact the the LE have not done their homework in Lindsay being missing for this long. And I really want to know why not.


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3
Post by: Fanny Mae on August 03, 2009, 12:56:44 AM
As usual, when I post here, posters just leave until I log off, and my questions are not answered. I think they are questions that are at the center of Lindsay being gone this long. I will leave you all alone to post in peace and I will read along and lurk, as it seems I have nothing to offer, or at least nothing that most feel is important or worth hearing.

I have lit a candle for Lindsay and I will continue to do so daily. I hope she is found soon, and this nightmare in McCleary can be over. I pray to God it is soon. We are all really on the same side. We just want Lindsay found.   ::MonkeyAngel::


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3
Post by: KaraK on August 03, 2009, 01:19:46 AM
I see KaraK is in the rafters watching, so I am wondering if she can answer any of our questions? I do not see the point of pointing out who each of the posters are so I will not. I have just been reading along and know that some think I am wrong for my stance on the McCleary PD and the Grays County Sheriff's office. I wonder if Karak can answer my questions.


I would be happy to answer some questions if I can - I don't get on much we have a lot going on or at least are trying to get a lot of things going on and done but if you wouldn't mind quoting or reposting your questions I will try to check back and answer as many as I can...



Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3
Post by: Fanny Mae on August 03, 2009, 01:29:24 AM
I see KaraK is in the rafters watching, so I am wondering if she can answer any of our questions? I do not see the point of pointing out who each of the posters are so I will not. I have just been reading along and know that some think I am wrong for my stance on the McCleary PD and the Grays County Sheriff's office. I wonder if Karak can answer my questions.


I would be happy to answer some questions if I can - I don't get on much we have a lot going on or at least are trying to get a lot of things going on and done but if you wouldn't mind quoting or reposting your questions I will try to check back and answer as many as I can...



I would like to know if as a local, you feel that everything possible has been done by the McCleary PD and the Grays Country Sheriff's Office?

I would also like to know if you feel that this latest search with cadaver dogs covered the area that REALLY needed to be searched, and that people along Lindsay's route were be cooperative?

Do you know if the King County Cadaver dogs were taken to the pond/spill over where the water system drains, and were they taken out in boats?

Have you seen any presence of FBI or State type officials in town?

Do you feel that LE of any kind are doing all they can to find Lindsay?

Have you heard of people in the search area refusing to let LE search their property, and what has the LE reaction been to that?

What do you think really happened to Lindsay that night?

I know it is a lot of questions, and I have never posted when you have been here. I only have the best intentions for Lindsay and want her found one way or the other.


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3
Post by: Tracygirl on August 03, 2009, 02:32:49 AM
Tamikosmom
I have not set on a specific theory, there are too many directions this case can go in and since I am not privy to the details that is known by LE, I cannot come out and say someone did this or should be a person of interest. In my opinion it takes more then a comment, a hunch or even a theory but logic and facts. As internet posters who are not on the ground talking to people, searching, conducting questioning, I don't know if we can truly ever know. However if you want to know what my hunch is, I think it is someone who is known to the area, maybe not specifically the neighborhood. I think Lindsey knew this person or has seen this person and was no longer a stranger to her. It is someone who is between  20-45 and maybe is known to act a little younger then what his age may tell. I think it is a sexually motivated crime and this person has gotten away with molestation before and has now moved on to killing. I think the kylie case may have a link to this one. Sadly, I do not believe she is alive and we will find her in water or in the forest areas someday. 

I think it is important to keep in mind Josh has a disability which if you knew about autism it makes it even more unlikely he could do this and not break. Obviously you believe otherwise, that is ok, we don't have to agree. Probably neither one of us is right and it will be someone or something we hadn't even thought of or knew of




Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3
Post by: pink angel on August 03, 2009, 02:47:08 AM
I see KaraK is in the rafters watching, so I am wondering if she can answer any of our questions? I do not see the point of pointing out who each of the posters are so I will not. I have just been reading along and know that some think I am wrong for my stance on the McCleary PD and the Grays County Sheriff's office. I wonder if Karak can answer my questions.


I would be happy to answer some questions if I can - I don't get on much we have a lot going on or at least are trying to get a lot of things going on and done but if you wouldn't mind quoting or reposting your questions I will try to check back and answer as many as I can...



I spoke to soon. Nice to see you KaraK. Thank you for answering some questions. It's most appreciated. I know you have been busy. Any luck with getting a search center set up and has Melissa contacted TES yet to help search for Lindsey?


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3
Post by: pink angel on August 03, 2009, 02:50:58 AM
I see KaraK is in the rafters watching, so I am wondering if she can answer any of our questions? I do not see the point of pointing out who each of the posters are so I will not. I have just been reading along and know that some think I am wrong for my stance on the McCleary PD and the Grays County Sheriff's office. I wonder if Karak can answer my questions.


I would be happy to answer some questions if I can - I don't get on much we have a lot going on or at least are trying to get a lot of things going on and done but if you wouldn't mind quoting or reposting your questions I will try to check back and answer as many as I can...



I spoke to soon. Nice to see you KaraK. Thank you for answering some questions. It's most appreciated. I know you have been busy. Any luck with getting a search center set up and has Melissa contacted TES yet to help search for Lindsey?

I am sorry Janet, for speaking for KaraK and KaraK, I am sorry for speaking for you. You did say earlier though you were not going to be posting anymore. I was just repeating what I believed to be true.

It's nice to see you and thank you in advance for all that you are doing for Lindsey. If we monkeys can help in anyway, don't hesitate to ask.


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3
Post by: A_News_Junkie_Monkey on August 03, 2009, 03:49:50 AM
ANJ, do you only see thing in black or white, and think there are no shades of grey? The law says one thing, but do you not think there is ever a case of a little fudging either way? I feel that you must study law, and know how it is written. I respect that. But in reality, there really are some shades of grey.

I am offended when someone makes a blanket statement and then leaves and goes off to another thread or just logs off. I am not speaking of you in this case, ANJ. Like I said before, you know me and knows who I am and why I feel the way I do. Basicially, I am a constitutionalist too. But I am a realist, and know that the constitution is streched way out of shape frequently. Sometimes for the good, sometimes for the worst. Lately it seems, it has really been way for the worst.

It still does not change the fact the the LE have not done their homework in Lindsay being missing for this long. And I really want to know why not.

Fanny- orginally, I was not going to reply to this comment, but I have changed my mind. 
Am I black and white - in part, yes.  But I am so much more than just black and white.  You imply I know you -- I know you from this board and a few emails we have exchanged but I have never met you or spoke with via phone - so no, I don't know you and you don't know me if you think I can be summed up as black and white.
Back to am I black and white - as I said, yes in part.  I am also open minded - I will look in the box, outside the box, under the box and 3000 miles away from the box.  I am intuitive - and that is certainly not black and white.  Yes, I love law, medicine, psychology and an array of topics.  I could go on, but I will spare the board. 
However, it is the black and white in dealing with an investigation that keeps a case from being a mistrial or a not guilty when a guilty verdict was in order.  I want LE to do all searches by the books, because that will insure justice for Lindsay.  It is those times when they 'fudge' and enter into the grey when justice is compromised most, IMHO.
I think you might want to look in the mirror about being black and white - when I simply tried to bring the constitutional issue up as many were upset that doors haven't been broken down in the search - you responded to me this way: 
I wrote:  Can I add, I see a bunch of posters wanting every home searched, but the 4th amendment to the US Constitution prevents that while guarding citizens rights to and guards against unreasonable searches and seizures.  They can't just enter all the homes without just cause.
You replied: Well shoot. Let's just quit looking for Lindsay. Let's go back to looking up every SO from McCleary to Timbuctu!
I also saw where you took part of my post out of context -
You said:  I did not think I was getting into "spats with fellow monkeys."  http://scaredmonkeys.net/index.php?topic=5790.620
I was not referring to you personally or anyone.  I was referring to the tone that was on the board today.  Monkeys against monkeys because of differing theories.  I have been reading all the different points of view - seeing many entertain lots out of their comfort or black and white zone and asking questions to try to see the other point of view.  On some of it, I see I bunch of bumped posts I have already read - but nothing new or overwhelmingly convincing - but I remain open to all the theories being tossed out.  What I do hate to see is tension getting in the way of respectful discussion of the case.  On that, I am black and white - I like when we all work together. 
More than I intended to post - and my email is in my profile so you or anyone who wants to discuss this more with me can send me a note, but lets get back to the news on Lindsay.


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3
Post by: KaraK on August 03, 2009, 04:33:53 AM


Pink Angel: No worries - I did say I wouldn't be posting because things are busy and I've just not had the time - not to mention that sometimes it is just a bit too difficult to read some opinions and some theories that people have....
 
As for TES MB did contact them and we are getting some information to them as we speak to see if they are willing to come out and help. Ultimately I think that may end up being up to LE. I am not sure though. If they come out then that is all that we will need to get the center active. We are also waiting to see if LRCF or someone through KKF is able to come out as well and get the ball rolling on some searches. Keep your fingers crossed for us that something works out in this area as well...

Fanny Mae:
I have a bit of trouble answering a few of these questions for several reasons but I’ll explain why that is then give you my “opinion” for whatever it is worth. Reason I have trouble with these questions is because there is a lot that we don’t know that has and continues to be done so our opinions are really just based on a partial side of a story but also on emotion as well (does that make sense?)…. We don't get to see first hand a lot of what takes place in Lindsey's search and because nothing has panned out we have No new news outside of what we had 2 weeks ago.

I as well as Lindsey’s family wish that there were still regular and large search parties being sent out daily - which we are trying to make happen- because no matter who reads this we’ve never been shy about the fact that we think searches ended WAY too early on- I also wish that every home had been actually searched in all of McCleary but I know even though this is a small town that this is far easier said then done. You read about little Robert Manwill from Boise and you hear about a 1,000 searchers scouring around looking for clues and that’s not the reality of it here – we are definitely not equipped with numbers like a lot of places are. - Outside of that I think I am really biased because Lindsey's not home yet so until she is there will always be that feeling that more could be being done...

I know that this is top priority for GHCS (though they are not the only agency involved) and that there is a TON of hard work and hours being put into and dedicated to nothing but finding Lindsey and finding out what happened to her as well as following leads etc but for good reason LE can't disclose everything that they are doing nor everything that they have done and because that is unfortunately something that is truly needed in cases like this - it leaves room for doubt to creep into your mind. I wish that they had more money and larger departments that could be dedicated to Lindsey but most of the men and women that they now have working on Lindsey’s case both MB and I believe are truly invested in finding her and would go to great lengths to bring her home..

I’ve not heard more then rumor of anyone denying access to their home when asked to search anywhere in town – I pray that they did not encounter that type of a response because regardless of “rights” there is a child missing and a reaction such as that is bound to at least temporarily redirect suspicion – which can waste valuable time that we don’t have to spare.

I will tell you that is not something that we would ever be informed officially about though because as you can guess there are many people who would take “searching” the property into their own hands. You pray that someone would leak that information for that reason alone but that’s just not how it works – or at least not yet.

Cadaver Dogs – They had cadaver dogs out early on just days after Lindsey went missing as well and at that time and the most recent searches they were taken to several varying locations. Where exactly searches were preformed we don’t know, not all locations were disclosed. I am personally not even aware of where the pond/spill over is located. If you know though please pass it along – if it is accessible we will make sure that it gets searched one way or another if it has not yet. Most water and wooded areas we have been told have at some point been searched though by both dogs and/or man.

What I know did not happen: She did NOT run away – she was not harmed by her mother or her brother – she was not harmed by anyone in my family

What I don’t think happened: I don’t think some lone random person happened to be driving through town at that exact moment in time that Lindsey was walking and was able to snatch her up without her making a sound or anyone seeing anything – I do believe that this is a possibility though…

What I think happened: I wish I knew exactly what happened but the 2 theories that I have are 1) someone she was familiar with and did not feel uncomfortable around (or someone who was at least familiar with her) happened to be driving by or outside their home when she was walking by and lured her in either using a pet, the offer of a ride or promise of something fun … or 2) Someone who does not necessarily live in town but is familiar with it had been watching her and bided their time waiting for the right opportunity for her to be alone

I agree with MB when she says that it feels like Lindsey is right under our noses and we can’t find her – that is exactly what it feels like and it is one of the most gut wrenching feelings you could ever imagine– at the end of the day it makes you want to shake people for “just going on with life” and start busting down doors all over McCleary and surrounding cities and pay attention to peoples “rights” later after Lindsey is found. Things don’t work that way, I know, but there are many a day when we wish that they did –


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3
Post by: love4ever on August 03, 2009, 06:30:50 AM
Thank you so much for your post Kara, and please forgive us for the theories and speculations of those who are innocent. I live afar from you and yet feel the pain and grief in my own distant location. I first started here with the Sandra Cantu case and found myself becoming emotional at times, and here in Lindseys case, in which I also found myself getting frustrated because of the want and need too find her. That is what all of us monkey's go through here, there is no one to blame for having feelings of loss over a child, our own or of someone elses, or the immense feelings of frustrations because we can not figure things out. I do believe that is what has happened here at our SM site yesterday and early this morning. I do not believe for one moment that anyone here disgusts in the other. I believe we are feeling the tension of the days gone by in which we can not find Lindsey.
Furthermore, having you post what you did Kara, gives a sense of relief and comfort to us in a way that we feel connected to Lindsey. It is also comforting in the way you feel with us in all that has been posted. Thank you for understanding most of all.
For me and others afar, I think in distance, it seems harder because we can not be right there to help, or volunteer in a physical way in the search for Lindsey. However we have the SM sites in which each one of us has our own special unique ability in research, and thought, to provide in the search for Lindsey. We have a lot of people here with great intuitive insight into cases such as Lindsey, but somehow, someway the perp finds a way to  get by with their immoral acts. Eventually they will be found.

With that, I just want to extend my blessings to the family and the friends of the family of Lindsey. We are here to help as much as we can, and by Gods Grace lets pray and hope for the return of Lindsey, and soon!

~Love4ever~


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3
Post by: Sister on August 03, 2009, 08:00:45 AM
I couldn't have said it better Love.  We all want Lindsey to be brought home safe.


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3
Post by: Leroy on August 03, 2009, 09:01:11 AM
I couldn't have said it better Love.  We all want Lindsey to be brought home safe.

I 2nd that!! 


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3
Post by: JessStar on August 03, 2009, 09:52:41 AM
Good morning everyone. I hope today is the day Lindsey is found. KaraK- thank you for the info.  I wish I could be on the ground with you- but I live over 3000 miles away from you. With that distance, I can only be there with you in spirit. But I'm there because I care.

I hope I didn't offend anyone with my posts last night. I think it was Fanny Mae that commented about someone offending her. I just try to offer my legal insight into difficult questions-being a lawyer for 15 years, that's my "area of expertise.". I'll NEVER cut and run- I'll offer my legal pespective to anyone who wants to hear it.


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3
Post by: pink angel on August 03, 2009, 10:19:16 AM
I couldn't have said it better Love.  We all want Lindsey to be brought home safe.

I 2nd that!! 
3rd or 4th that. ::winks at Jess::


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3
Post by: no rose colored glasses on August 03, 2009, 10:31:38 AM
I suppose with every case I ever followed the police did somethings in investigating where I or someone thought they were not doing the best investigating. But being that this is a small town and they hardly have any police, they probably did the best they could in the beginning, I don't know. And KaraK thanks for the info, and I also believe Lindsey knew the person.


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3
Post by: Tamikosmom on August 03, 2009, 10:31:42 AM


Pink Angel: No worries - I did say I wouldn't be posting because things are busy and I've just not had the time - not to mention that sometimes it is just a bit too difficult to read some opinions and some theories that people have....
 
As for TES MB did contact them and we are getting some information to them as we speak to see if they are willing to come out and help. Ultimately I think that may end up being up to LE. I am not sure though. If they come out then that is all that we will need to get the center active. We are also waiting to see if LRCF or someone through KKF is able to come out as well and get the ball rolling on some searches. Keep your fingers crossed for us that something works out in this area as well...


Fanny Mae:
I have a bit of trouble answering a few of these questions for several reasons but I’ll explain why that is then give you my “opinion” for whatever it is worth. Reason I have trouble with these questions is because there is a lot that we don’t know that has and continues to be done so our opinions are really just based on a partial side of a story but also on emotion as well (does that make sense?)…. We don't get to see first hand a lot of what takes place in Lindsey's search and because nothing has panned out we have No new news outside of what we had 2 weeks ago.

I as well as Lindsey’s family wish that there were still regular and large search parties being sent out daily - which we are trying to make happen- because no matter who reads this we’ve never been shy about the fact that we think searches ended WAY too early on- I also wish that every home had been actually searched in all of McCleary but I know even though this is a small town that this is far easier said then done. You read about little Robert Manwill from Boise and you hear about a 1,000 searchers scouring around looking for clues and that’s not the reality of it here – we are definitely not equipped with numbers like a lot of places are. - Outside of that I think I am really biased because Lindsey's not home yet so until she is there will always be that feeling that more could be being done...

I know that this is top priority for GHCS (though they are not the only agency involved) and that there is a TON of hard work and hours being put into and dedicated to nothing but finding Lindsey and finding out what happened to her as well as following leads etc but for good reason LE can't disclose everything that they are doing nor everything that they have done and because that is unfortunately something that is truly needed in cases like this - it leaves room for doubt to creep into your mind. I wish that they had more money and larger departments that could be dedicated to Lindsey but most of the men and women that they now have working on Lindsey’s case both MB and I believe are truly invested in finding her and would go to great lengths to bring her home..

I’ve not heard more then rumor of anyone denying access to their home when asked to search anywhere in town – I pray that they did not encounter that type of a response because regardless of “rights” there is a child missing and a reaction such as that is bound to at least temporarily redirect suspicion – which can waste valuable time that we don’t have to spare.

I will tell you that is not something that we would ever be informed officially about though because as you can guess there are many people who would take “searching” the property into their own hands. You pray that someone would leak that information for that reason alone but that’s just not how it works – or at least not yet.

Cadaver Dogs – They had cadaver dogs out early on just days after Lindsey went missing as well and at that time and the most recent searches they were taken to several varying locations. Where exactly searches were preformed we don’t know, not all locations were disclosed. I am personally not even aware of where the pond/spill over is located. If you know though please pass it along – if it is accessible we will make sure that it gets searched one way or another if it has not yet. Most water and wooded areas we have been told have at some point been searched though by both dogs and/or man.

What I know did not happen: She did NOT run away – she was not harmed by her mother or her brother – she was not harmed by anyone in my family

What I don’t think happened: I don’t think some lone random person happened to be driving through town at that exact moment in time that Lindsey was walking and was able to snatch her up without her making a sound or anyone seeing anything – I do believe that this is a possibility though…

What I think happened: I wish I knew exactly what happened but the 2 theories that I have are 1) someone she was familiar with and did not feel uncomfortable around (or someone who was at least familiar with her) happened to be driving by or outside their home when she was walking by and lured her in either using a pet, the offer of a ride or promise of something fun … or 2) Someone who does not necessarily live in town but is familiar with it had been watching her and bided their time waiting for the right opportunity for her to be alone

I agree with MB when she says that it feels like Lindsey is right under our noses and we can’t find her – that is exactly what it feels like and it is one of the most gut wrenching feelings you could ever imagine– at the end of the day it makes you want to shake people for “just going on with life” and start busting down doors all over McCleary and surrounding cities and pay attention to peoples “rights” later after Lindsey is found. Things don’t work that way, I know, but there are many a day when we wish that they did –

Thanks Kara.

I would have appreciated if you had answered my question directly ... "What time did Josh Baum arrive home on the evening his sister disappeared?"

Janet

+++++++

1.  KAMPEN/WILLIAMS

Considering Scott Williams passed a polygraph and ... there was a confirmed sighting of Lindsey at Fifth on Maple at 9:30 PM which would coinside with the approximate time she left your home (9:15 PM - 9:30 PM) ... this would elminate you and Scott as persons of interest.


2.  MELISSA BAUM

Considering Melissa Baum pass a polygraph ... this would eliminate her as a person of interest that had anything to do with Lindsey's disappearance or direct knowledge at that point in time.


3.  JOSH BAUM

Considering your words ... I would assume that Josh Baum was home with his Mom at 9:30 PM ... the time of the last confirmed sighting of Lindsey.  In other words ... he went home as per the instructions of the family friend who intervened in the argument.  There was no possibility of chance encounter with Lindsey in that two block stretch between Fifth on Maple and home.  Am I correct with that assumption?




 


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3
Post by: Tamikosmom on August 03, 2009, 10:40:20 AM
I see KaraK is in the rafters watching, so I am wondering if she can answer any of our questions? I do not see the point of pointing out who each of the posters are so I will not. I have just been reading along and know that some think I am wrong for my stance on the McCleary PD and the Grays County Sheriff's office. I wonder if Karak can answer my questions.


I would be happy to answer some questions if I can - I don't get on much we have a lot going on or at least are trying to get a lot of things going on and done but if you wouldn't mind quoting or reposting your questions I will try to check back and answer as many as I can...



I spoke to soon. Nice to see you KaraK. Thank you for answering some questions. It's most appreciated. I know you have been busy. Any luck with getting a search center set up and has Melissa contacted TES yet to help search for Lindsey?

I am sorry Janet, for speaking for KaraK and KaraK, I am sorry for speaking for you. You did say earlier though you were not going to be posting anymore. I was just repeating what I believed to be true.

It's nice to see you and thank you in advance for all that you are doing for Lindsey. If we monkeys can help in anyway, don't hesitate to ask.


"I am done"?

Pink Angel ... I have posted those words a hundred time ... maybe more ... in the past four years on the Natalee Holloway forum.  Then I make myself a cuppa tea and ... keep posting.

I hope not too many Monkeys on the Lindsey Baum forum got too excited.

 ::MonkeyHaHa::

Pink Angel ... we do not have to be on the same page in our speculations.  None of us know the answers.  The important think is that a missing 10 year old little girl remains our foucs.

Good Morning All.

Janet
7:40 AM PT


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3
Post by: crazybabyborg on August 03, 2009, 10:41:48 AM
I suppose with every case I ever followed the police did somethings in investigating where I or someone thought they were not doing the best investigating. But being that this is a small town and they hardly have any police, they probably did the best they could in the beginning, I don't know. And KaraK thanks for the info, and I also believe Lindsey knew the person.

Good Morning Monkeys!

I too wanted to add my hopes that Lindsey be found. Thanks for the information KaraK.


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3
Post by: no rose colored glasses on August 03, 2009, 10:43:42 AM
I'm going to ask these questions again, and hopefully someone local will answer. What is going on in the town now? Is it back to normal? Are neighbors suspicious of each other? Are kids out and about playing? What is the general thoughts about what happened to Lindsey?


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3
Post by: pink angel on August 03, 2009, 10:51:58 AM
I see KaraK is in the rafters watching, so I am wondering if she can answer any of our questions? I do not see the point of pointing out who each of the posters are so I will not. I have just been reading along and know that some think I am wrong for my stance on the McCleary PD and the Grays County Sheriff's office. I wonder if Karak can answer my questions.


I would be happy to answer some questions if I can - I don't get on much we have a lot going on or at least are trying to get a lot of things going on and done but if you wouldn't mind quoting or reposting your questions I will try to check back and answer as many as I can...



I spoke to soon. Nice to see you KaraK. Thank you for answering some questions. It's most appreciated. I know you have been busy. Any luck with getting a search center set up and has Melissa contacted TES yet to help search for Lindsey?

I am sorry Janet, for speaking for KaraK and KaraK, I am sorry for speaking for you. You did say earlier though you were not going to be posting anymore. I was just repeating what I believed to be true.

It's nice to see you and thank you in advance for all that you are doing for Lindsey. If we monkeys can help in anyway, don't hesitate to ask.


"I am done"?

Pink Angel ... I have posted those words a hundred time ... maybe more ... in the past four years on the Natalee Holloway forum.  Then I make myself a cuppa tea and ... keep posting.

I hope not too many Monkeys on the Lindsey Baum forum got too excited.

 ::MonkeyHaHa::

Pink Angel ... we do not have to be on the same page in our speculations.  None of us know the answers.  The important think is that a missing 10 year old little girl remains our foucs.

Good Morning All.

Janet
7:40 AM PT

I wasn't talking about you saying you were not posting anymore, I was talking about KaraK, in the above posts.

She had said earlier that she was concerned about what the kids were reading and she was busy setting up a search center and wouldn't be posting on anymore blogs. I answered for her, when you asked her a question. I shouldn't have done that. That is why I said I was sorry.

To you for speaking for Kara and to Kara for speaking for her.



Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3
Post by: pink angel on August 03, 2009, 10:53:24 AM
p.s. Good morning all. :)


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3
Post by: no rose colored glasses on August 03, 2009, 10:54:01 AM
p.s. Good morning all. :)
Good Morning  ::MonkeyCool::


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3
Post by: Leroy on August 03, 2009, 11:01:44 AM
p.s. Good morning all. :)

Good Morning Pink!  (do you ever sleep....lol)


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3
Post by: pink angel on August 03, 2009, 11:04:45 AM
p.s. Good morning all. :)

Good Morning Pink!  (do you ever sleep....lol)

I try. As of late, not so much.


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3
Post by: Tamikosmom on August 03, 2009, 11:10:38 AM
THE TRACKING DOGS

Why was Lindsey's scent not picked up by these dogs shortly following her disappearance.  Think about it ... the Maple Street route was taken by Lindsey both going to and coming from the Kampen/Williams residence.

Something is not right.

 ::MonkeyNoNo::

Janet

++++++


KOMO News - June 28, 2009

A wide-ranging search was launched early Saturday in the town and the surrounding forests. The town was criss-crossed three times, but not a trace of Lindsey has been found. Even bloodhounds failed to pick up her scent.

http://www.komonews.com/news/local/49383897.html


The Daily World - July 2, 2009

Scott said authorities have run into several dead ends with almost no signs of the 4-foot-9, brown-haired girl, who was last spotted wearing a blue pullover shirt and blue jeans.

“I don’t know anything more than I knew Saturday afternoon,” he said, “but I’m not willing to admit that I know anything less.”

Scott said bloodhounds traced the route Lindsey took early on from the friend’s house to her own home, but didn’t find any scent. And in places where Lindsey once played — parks and by the creek — Lindsey’s scent has been vanishing.

The loss of scent could be a combination of factors — the heat on the sidewalk could have dissipated it for instance, he said.

http://**/articles/2009/07/02/local_news/doc4a4cf43c1b1dd881132403.txt


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3
Post by: Leroy on August 03, 2009, 11:18:45 AM
Janet - I have wondered that from the beginning....You would think the dogs would have picked up her scent somewhere beyond Kara's yard...


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3
Post by: AZSunny on August 03, 2009, 11:23:30 AM
THE TRACKING DOGS

Why was Lindsey's scent not picked up by these dogs shortly following her disappearance.  Think about it ... the Maple Street route was taken by Lindsey both going to and coming from the Kampen/Williams residence.

Something is not right.

 ::MonkeyNoNo::

Janet

++++++



Janet,  the explanation is the sustained heat and it  the scents rising from the sidewalk and dissapating. If this is not the case, what are you suggesting?  Please don't start on the JB connection again. It is simply not a viable action in my estimation.  I think we need to look somewhere else.  Where do you suggest?


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3
Post by: Tamikosmom on August 03, 2009, 11:30:25 AM
THE TRACKING DOGS

Why was Lindsey's scent not picked up by these dogs shortly following her disappearance.  Think about it ... the Maple Street route was taken by Lindsey both going to and coming from the Kampen/Williams residence.

Something is not right.

 ::MonkeyNoNo::

Janet

++++++



Janet,  the explanation is the sustained heat and it  the scents rising from the sidewalk and dissapating. If this is not the case, what are you suggesting?  Please don't start on the JB connection again. It is simply not a viable action in my estimation.  I think we need to look somewhere else.  Where do you suggest?

AZSunny ... considering it is a known fact that Lindsey was on Maple on foot in her journey to the Kampen and ... she was at the Shell station ... I was questioning the capability of the dogs.

Janet   


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3
Post by: Tamikosmom on August 03, 2009, 11:31:08 AM
Janet - I have wondered that from the beginning....You would think the dogs would have picked up her scent somewhere beyond Kara's yard...

BINGO!!


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3
Post by: klaasend on August 03, 2009, 11:37:59 AM
Just my own personal opinion but I don't think the "children" or the parents of missing persons belong posting or reading these message boards, especially not the children. 

I also don't believe we should censure our posts thinking they may be. 


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3
Post by: Fanny Mae on August 03, 2009, 11:47:39 AM
Good Morning.  ::MonkeyAngel::

I wanted to come back on and thank KaraK for coming back to answer some of my questions will I was gone. I appreciate you going to the trouble to do that for me, a total stranger to you on this thread as we have never posted together.

To ANJ, forgive me for having implied you knew me. I thought I had told you quite a bit about my background, and you would understand I was not talking off the top of my head. I will not ever claim that you know the slightest thing about me again. The spatting comment was made in a post to me, so I took it that way.

It was not you JESSTAR that I was talking about when I said it offended me for someone to make a blanket statement and immediately log off. Sorry, if you thought I meant you.

I am still suprised that in McCleary, being a little town, where ususally a town of this size everyone knows everything about everybody, that nobody really knows nothing, and nothing about what the police are really doing. And why it is so hard to get a simple building for willing private searcers to come in and at least try to look for Lindsay. It is mindboggling.

I too only hope for the return of Lindsay, and pray it will not drag out into months and years of agony for her friends and family. I will light a candle everyday as I have usually done, and may from time to time read along. I am sorry that I upset the applecart for posting my thoughts here.   ::MonkeyCool::


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3
Post by: Heidismom on August 03, 2009, 11:48:07 AM
Fanny Mae,
McCleary did not have a 4th of July celebration/parade.  Need to have your facts straight.  And you can't know the attitude & sadness of a town unless you are here.


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3
Post by: Tamikosmom on August 03, 2009, 11:54:25 AM
Fanny Mae,
McCleary did not have a 4th of July celebration/parade.  Need to have your facts straight.  And you can't know the attitude & sadness of a town unless you are here.

Heidismom

Do you have a personal connection to the Baum family?

Thank you

Janet


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3
Post by: no rose colored glasses on August 03, 2009, 12:01:36 PM
Fanny Mae,
McCleary did not have a 4th of July celebration/parade.  Need to have your facts straight.  And you can't know the attitude & sadness of a town unless you are here.
Could you answer my questions, please. How are the towns people acting, is it like life goes on, or are people suspicious of each other? Are kids out and about and playing like before? What is the general thought of people about what happened to Lindsey?


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3
Post by: Heidismom on August 03, 2009, 12:07:26 PM
Fanny Mae,
McCleary did not have a 4th of July celebration/parade.  Need to have your facts straight.  And you can't know the attitude & sadness of a town unless you are here.

Heidismom

Do you have a personal connection to the Baum family?

Thank you

Janet
No, I don't, just great compassion for them for what they are going through.  I also feel so badly for Josh as he faces his teen & adult years with challenges that are not anyone's fault.


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3
Post by: Tracygirl on August 03, 2009, 12:09:01 PM
Just my own personal opinion but I don't think the "children" or the parents of missing persons belong posting or reading these message boards, especially not the children. 

I also don't believe we should censure our posts thinking they may be. 

Good morning everyone,
Klaas I am not sure if you are directing this to my post when I commented on what if the family or loved ones read our postings. I was referring to the arguing and loss of focus on trying to help. I would think should be able to discuss and debate without losing our composure.
Kara thanks for posting back to us, I appreciate your comments and observations.
 
I am going to add my 2 cents... A town does go back to normal. It doesn't say anything else other  then life goes on, no matter how horrible it can be,  we have to get back to what we know as normal in order to survive. I am sure as it was in Tracy, as it is in Boise, in Escondido and the many other cities and towns, McCleary is heartbroken they have not been able to locate Lindsey and want nothing more then to have her home.


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3
Post by: pink angel on August 03, 2009, 12:10:10 PM
THE TRACKING DOGS

Why was Lindsey's scent not picked up by these dogs shortly following her disappearance.  Think about it ... the Maple Street route was taken by Lindsey both going to and coming from the Kampen/Williams residence.

Something is not right.

 ::MonkeyNoNo::

Janet

++++++



Janet,  the explanation is the sustained heat and it  the scents rising from the sidewalk and dissapating. If this is not the case, what are you suggesting?  Please don't start on the JB connection again. It is simply not a viable action in my estimation.  I think we need to look somewhere else.  Where do you suggest?

AZSunny ... considering it is a known fact that Lindsey was on Maple on foot in her journey to the Kampen and ... she was at the Shell station ... I was questioning the capability of the dogs.

Janet   

http://www.cityofboise.org/Departments/Police/Multimedia/DepartmentVideos/BloodhoundDemoVNR.wmv

Janet,
Here is a video of a bloodhound used in the search for Robert Manwill. It's a demonstration on how they work. The handler even says that is harder to track on asphalt because it doesn't hold scent the way grass and bushes do. 


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3
Post by: Tamikosmom on August 03, 2009, 12:18:05 PM
Fanny Mae,
McCleary did not have a 4th of July celebration/parade.  Need to have your facts straight.  And you can't know the attitude & sadness of a town unless you are here.

Heidismom

Do you have a personal connection to the Baum family?

Thank you

Janet
No, I don't, just great compassion for them for what they are going through.  I also feel so badly for Josh as he faces his teen & adult years with challenges that are not anyone's fault.

What has been revealed in regards to the various troubling issues encompassing Josh Baum ... I too feel for this young man.  Nevertheless ... considering the heated argument just prior to his sister's disappearance ... the heated argument that dictated intervention by a family friend ... Josh Baum must be considered a person of interest until eliminated by LE.  In the name of justice for Lindsey Baum ... no person of interest should be given a free pass.

Heidismom ... thank you for responding.

Janet


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3
Post by: Tamikosmom on August 03, 2009, 12:20:40 PM
THE TRACKING DOGS

Why was Lindsey's scent not picked up by these dogs shortly following her disappearance.  Think about it ... the Maple Street route was taken by Lindsey both going to and coming from the Kampen/Williams residence.

Something is not right.

 ::MonkeyNoNo::

Janet

++++++



Janet,  the explanation is the sustained heat and it  the scents rising from the sidewalk and dissapating. If this is not the case, what are you suggesting?  Please don't start on the JB connection again. It is simply not a viable action in my estimation.  I think we need to look somewhere else.  Where do you suggest?

AZSunny ... considering it is a known fact that Lindsey was on Maple on foot in her journey to the Kampen and ... she was at the Shell station ... I was questioning the capability of the dogs.

Janet   

http://www.cityofboise.org/Departments/Police/Multimedia/DepartmentVideos/BloodhoundDemoVNR.wmv

Janet,
Here is a video of a bloodhound used in the search for Robert Manwill. It's a demonstration on how they work. The handler even says that is harder to track on asphalt because it doesn't hold scent the way grass and bushes do. 


Thank you pink angel

I just thought that somewhere along that Maple Street route ... some where in the Shell Station ... a scent would be detected.

Janet


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3
Post by: no rose colored glasses on August 03, 2009, 12:24:11 PM
Am I too assume that life has moved on in McCleary?  ::MonkeyEek::


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3
Post by: AZSunny on August 03, 2009, 12:26:19 PM
THE TRACKING DOGS

Why was Lindsey's scent not picked up by these dogs shortly following her disappearance.  Think about it ... the Maple Street route was taken by Lindsey both going to and coming from the Kampen/Williams residence.

Something is not right.

 ::MonkeyNoNo::

Janet

++++++



Janet,  the explanation is the sustained heat and it  the scents rising from the sidewalk and dissapating. If this is not the case, what are you suggesting?  Please don't start on the JB connection again. It is simply not a viable action in my estimation.  I think we need to look somewhere else.  Where do you suggest?

AZSunny ... considering it is a known fact that Lindsey was on Maple on foot in her journey to the Kampen and ... she was at the Shell station ... I was questioning the capability of the dogs.

Janet   

http://www.cityofboise.org/Departments/Police/Multimedia/DepartmentVideos/BloodhoundDemoVNR.wmv

Janet,
Here is a video of a bloodhound used in the search for Robert Manwill. It's a demonstration on how they work. The handler even says that is harder to track on asphalt because it doesn't hold scent the way grass and bushes do. 


Fascinating video.  Thanks Pink Angel.     It just occured to me, that there are not sidewalks in the area. I don't know why this took me so long to realize.I was visualizing her on a sidewalk walking home.   Lindsey would be walking on the street, asphalt most probably.  Heavy traffic wasn't an apparent concern, so she would not have been walking on the side of the road, in the dirt and gravel.


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3
Post by: pink angel on August 03, 2009, 12:29:48 PM
There have been several cases I can think of where people have gone missing and dogs don't pick up a scent or unable to track the person. (depending on the whether they are scent dogs or air tracking dogs)

I would think there would be a scent picked up too and the fact that there was not, is sad for Lindsey.

Dogs are just a tool though and like humans are fallible. They are only as good as the scent available, the conditions, the scent objects they are given, their training and their handler.




Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3
Post by: pink angel on August 03, 2009, 12:32:32 PM
There have been several cases I can think of where people have gone missing and dogs don't pick up a scent or unable to track the person. (depending on the whether they are scent dogs or air tracking dogs)

I would think there would be a scent picked up too and the fact that there was not, is sad for Lindsey.

Dogs are just a tool though and like humans are fallible. They are only as good as the scent available, the conditions, the scent objects they are given, their training and their handler.




and even then, they do make errors.

I too found the video fascinating, AZ. You are welcome.


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3
Post by: Fanny Mae on August 03, 2009, 12:38:02 PM
Fanny Mae,
McCleary did not have a 4th of July celebration/parade.  Need to have your facts straight.  And you can't know the attitude & sadness of a town unless you are here.

My apologies, it was the BEAR FESTIVAL pictures and parade I was refering to, held the second week in July.

http://www.cityofmccleary.com/index.asp?Type=B_BASIC&SEC={16587989-AB3D-40DE-AD14-52F45942F4A2}


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3
Post by: Kat_Gram on August 03, 2009, 12:42:30 PM
Her scent would stop if she got into a car.


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3
Post by: Tracygirl on August 03, 2009, 12:43:11 PM
Am I too assume that life has moved on in McCleary?  ::MonkeyEek::

I don't think it is unreasonable to assume life goes on. Although, in my opinion it doesn't mean the town has forgotten.


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3
Post by: no rose colored glasses on August 03, 2009, 12:45:25 PM
Am I too assume that life has moved on in McCleary?  ::MonkeyEek::

I don't think it is unreasonable to assume life goes on. Although, in my opinion it doesn't mean the town has forgotten.

All I'm trying to get an answer to is how are the people in town reacting to what happend to Lindsey? Are they being more cautious, are they suspicious of their neighbors, what is the talk in town like about this?


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3
Post by: Fanny Mae on August 03, 2009, 12:46:25 PM
Am I too assume that life has moved on in McCleary?  ::MonkeyEek::

I don't think it is unreasonable to assume life goes on. Although, in my opinion it doesn't mean the town has forgotten.


In your experience in Tracy when Sandra Cantu came up missing, was it that way too?


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3
Post by: Tracygirl on August 03, 2009, 12:47:00 PM
Fanny Mae,
McCleary did not have a 4th of July celebration/parade.  Need to have your facts straight.  And you can't know the attitude & sadness of a town unless you are here.

My apologies, it was the BEAR FESTIVAL pictures and parade I was refering to, held the second week in July.

http://www.cityofmccleary.com/index.asp?Type=B_BASIC&SEC={16587989-AB3D-40DE-AD14-52F45942F4A2}

That was the festival or gathering they put out posters and such? At least it was used to spread the word to as many people as possible about Lindsey.

In tracy after Kyle had escaped from the house of terror it was around the holiday season, it felt weird to be at our towns parade, to go to the tree lighting


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3
Post by: Tracygirl on August 03, 2009, 12:48:35 PM
Am I too assume that life has moved on in McCleary?  ::MonkeyEek::

I don't think it is unreasonable to assume life goes on. Although, in my opinion it doesn't mean the town has forgotten.


In your experience in Tracy when Sandra Cantu came up missing, was it that way too?

Yep!


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3
Post by: Fanny Mae on August 03, 2009, 02:09:13 PM
Am I too assume that life has moved on in McCleary?  ::MonkeyEek::

I don't think it is unreasonable to assume life goes on. Although, in my opinion it doesn't mean the town has forgotten.


In your experience in Tracy when Sandra Cantu came up missing, was it that way too?

Yep!

 ::MonkeyEek:: ::MonkeyNoNo:: ::MonkeyWaa::


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3
Post by: JessStar on August 03, 2009, 02:28:42 PM
Fanny Mae, I recently had the same reaction as you are having to what tracygirl is saying. But it was in connection with Nevaeh-a little girl that (probably because of her tender age), really brought me to my knees. I'm a big hockey fan. I remember watching some of the stanley cup finals (the Detroit Redwings were playing), and watching all the Detroit fans cheering in their seats thinking "How could they!  A little girl is missing from your community, and you are watching hockey and cheering!"  That was my state of mind. But I had to realize that yes, life must go on. Nevaeh would want it that way, I'm sure. That doesn't mean for one second that I have forgotten about her. She is still in my thoughts and prayers, much like Sandra Cantu is.


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3
Post by: JessStar on August 03, 2009, 02:38:56 PM
And I should add, much like all the children-Lindsey included. Once I become personally invested, its hard for me to walk away. And impossible for me to forget.


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3
Post by: no rose colored glasses on August 03, 2009, 02:42:36 PM
And I should add, much like all the children-Lindsey included. Once I become personally invested, its hard for me to walk away. And impossible for me to forget.
I am the same way.


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3
Post by: chi-monkey on August 03, 2009, 02:44:11 PM
Fanny Mae,
McCleary did not have a 4th of July celebration/parade.  Need to have your facts straight.  And you can't know the attitude & sadness of a town unless you are here.

Heidismom

Do you have a personal connection to the Baum family?

Thank you

Janet
No, I don't, just great compassion for them for what they are going through.  I also feel so badly for Josh as he faces his teen & adult years with challenges that are not anyone's fault.

What has been revealed in regards to the various troubling issues encompassing Josh Baum ... I too feel for this young man.  Nevertheless ... considering the heated argument just prior to his sister's disappearance ... the heated argument that dictated intervention by a family friend ... Josh Baum must be considered a person of interest until eliminated by LE.  In the name of justice for Lindsey Baum ... no person of interest should be given a free pass.

Heidismom ... thank you for responding.

Janet

Janet, I strongly agree with you on this.  If we cannot consider or discuss Josh, the only one fighting with Lindsey that last day, then we have no reason to be here.  The reasons given for not looking at him are not compelling to me.    A moment of uncontrolled rage and a little help with cleanup is all it would have required for Josh to be involved.   Feeling sorry for Josh is not the point here; finding Lindsey is.   

Chi-M



Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3
Post by: Fanny Mae on August 03, 2009, 02:52:08 PM
Fanny Mae, I recently had the same reaction as you are having to what tracygirl is saying. But it was in connection with Nevaeh-a little girl that (probably because of her tender age), really brought me to my knees. I'm a big hockey fan. I remember watching some of the stanley cup finals (the Detroit Redwings were playing), and watching all the Detroit fans cheering in their seats thinking "How could they!  A little girl is missing from your community, and you are watching hockey and cheering!"  That was my state of mind. But I had to realize that yes, life must go on. Nevaeh would want it that way, I'm sure. That doesn't mean for one second that I have forgotten about her. She is still in my thoughts and prayers, much like Sandra Cantu is.

I appreciate you noticing my distress over this. Monroe Mi is not in Detroit, but is a small community between Toledo and Detroit. Tracy, Ca is not the biggest place in the world either. but I remember the outpouring and the news and television ongoing reports. And the interviews going on with citizens who were beside themselves with worry. And the huge outporings of attendence for their vigils and memorials in both places. Yes, I guess life goes on, but the loss of a child in the area is still the topmost concern until they are found.

I have seen nothing like that in McCleary, Wa. I realize it is an out of the way place, probably someplace that most of us have never been to or lived in. It is just unfathomable to me that so many people in such a small place know nothing, and would just to prefer it to be that way. If the LE and the people in such a situation make it uncomfortable for media and outsiders to be there, they will leave. A simple fact. And it seems to be deliberately so.

As far as my remarks for the Bear Festival going on so close to the time of Lindsay being missing, now we are hearing how the city and the LE are underfunded, and the Grays County Sheriff's Office is thinking of cuts. I guess it looks to me like priotities of a missing child vesus disappointing this year's Bear Festival participants were measured, and guess who won? Ok, flyers were handed out to a few more people than those that live right in town. How did that work out for them? It sounds like a case of "Come to town, Leave your money, and then leave and leave us alone."


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3
Post by: Tamikosmom on August 03, 2009, 02:58:31 PM
Fanny Mae,
McCleary did not have a 4th of July celebration/parade.  Need to have your facts straight.  And you can't know the attitude & sadness of a town unless you are here.

Heidismom

Do you have a personal connection to the Baum family?

Thank you

Janet
No, I don't, just great compassion for them for what they are going through.  I also feel so badly for Josh as he faces his teen & adult years with challenges that are not anyone's fault.

What has been revealed in regards to the various troubling issues encompassing Josh Baum ... I too feel for this young man.  Nevertheless ... considering the heated argument just prior to his sister's disappearance ... the heated argument that dictated intervention by a family friend ... Josh Baum must be considered a person of interest until eliminated by LE.  In the name of justice for Lindsey Baum ... no person of interest should be given a free pass.

Heidismom ... thank you for responding.

Janet

Janet, I strongly agree with you on this.  If we cannot consider or discuss Josh, the only one fighting with Lindsey that last day, then we have no reason to be here.  The reasons given for not looking at him are not compelling to me.    A moment of uncontrolled rage and a little help with cleanup is all it would have required for Josh to be involved.   Feeling sorry for Josh is not the point here; finding Lindsey is.   

Chi-M



Thank you chi-Monkey.

Sometimes I feel I am in a twilight zone.

Janet


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3
Post by: chi-monkey on August 03, 2009, 03:12:54 PM
Private wells and septic tanks pose a danger to children.  Many old towns have private wells, most unused but sometimes not permanently sealed.  Septic tanks often have openings large enough for a small child to fall in, or otherwise.   Ditto underground water cisterns. 

Reading the McCleary City information I see that the city services supply water and sewer to most residents, but some in outlying areas of town use private wells and tanks.   Also, that gas station may have abandoned its old leaky underground storage tanks, but left them in place. 

So far I have not found local maps showing this detail.  Just worrying.

Chi-M


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3
Post by: Fanny Mae on August 03, 2009, 03:17:45 PM
Private wells and septic tanks pose a danger to children.  Many old towns have private wells, most unused but sometimes not permanently sealed.  Septic tanks often have openings large enough for a small child to fall in, or otherwise.   Ditto underground water cisterns. 

Reading the McCleary City information I see that the city services supply water and sewer to most residents, but some in outlying areas of town use private wells and tanks.   Also, that gas station may have abandoned its old leaky underground storage tanks, but left them in place. 

So far I have not found local maps showing this detail.  Just worrying.

Chi-M

You have just brought up concerns that I posted much earlier in the thread, and the only answers that were ever forthcoming were "I don't know", to nothing. I am glad you brought it up again.


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3
Post by: AZSunny on August 03, 2009, 03:24:17 PM
Fanny Mae,
McCleary did not have a 4th of July celebration/parade.  Need to have your facts straight.  And you can't know the attitude & sadness of a town unless you are here.

Heidismom

Do you have a personal connection to the Baum family?

Thank you

Janet
No, I don't, just great compassion for them for what they are going through.  I also feel so badly for Josh as he faces his teen & adult years with challenges that are not anyone's fault.

What has been revealed in regards to the various troubling issues encompassing Josh Baum ... I too feel for this young man.  Nevertheless ... considering the heated argument just prior to his sister's disappearance ... the heated argument that dictated intervention by a family friend ... Josh Baum must be considered a person of interest until eliminated by LE.  In the name of justice for Lindsey Baum ... no person of interest should be given a free pass.

Heidismom ... thank you for responding.

Janet

Janet, I strongly agree with you on this.  If we cannot consider or discuss Josh, the only one fighting with Lindsey that last day, then we have no reason to be here.  The reasons given for not looking at him are not compelling to me.    A moment of uncontrolled rage and a little help with cleanup is all it would have required for Josh to be involved.   Feeling sorry for Josh is not the point here; finding Lindsey is.   

Chi-M



Chi, I don't think anyone said we were not considering Josh or that it couldn't be discussed, or that investigations on his background are not important. It doesn't mean that we can't focus on other issues, and not dedicate the whole thread to one suspect.  When page after page is covered on one issue, we lose focus on all the other suspects and circumstances. 

 Do I personally think Josh was involved, NO...I don't think he is mentally capable or focused enough to have done this by himself. Maybe the focus should be who may have helped him?  Not his mother as she has taken a poly and passed.  Perhaps there should be a separate thread just to discuss Josh.  Would that keep everyone happy??


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3
Post by: JessStar on August 03, 2009, 03:27:15 PM
Fanny Mae, I recently had the same reaction as you are having to what tracygirl is saying. But it was in connection with Nevaeh-a little girl that (probably because of her tender age), really brought me to my knees. I'm a big hockey fan. I remember watching some of the stanley cup finals (the Detroit Redwings were playing), and watching all the Detroit fans cheering in their seats thinking "How could they!  A little girl is missing from your community, and you are watching hockey and cheering!"  That was my state of mind. But I had to realize that yes, life must go on. Nevaeh would want it that way, I'm sure. That doesn't mean for one second that I have forgotten about her. She is still in my thoughts and prayers, much like Sandra Cantu is.

I appreciate you noticing my distress over this. Monroe Mi is not in Detroit, but is a small community between Toledo and Detroit. Tracy, Ca is not the biggest place in the world either. but I remember the outpouring and the news and television ongoing reports. And the interviews going on with citizens who were beside themselves with worry. And the huge outporings of attendence for their vigils and memorials in both places. Yes, I guess life goes on, but the loss of a child in the area is still the topmost concern until they are found.

I have seen nothing like that in McCleary, Wa. I realize it is an out of the way place, probably someplace that most of us have never been to or lived in. It is just unfathomable to me that so many people in such a small place know nothing, and would just to prefer it to be that way. If the LE and the people in such a situation make it uncomfortable for media and outsiders to be there, they will leave. A simple fact. And it seems to be deliberately so.

As far as my remarks for the Bear Festival going on so close to the time of Lindsay being missing, now we are hearing how the city and the LE are underfunded, and the Grays County Sheriff's Office is thinking of cuts. I guess it looks to me like priotities of a missing child vesus disappointing this year's Bear Festival participants were measured, and guess who won? Ok, flyers were handed out to a few more people than those that live right in town. How did that work out for them? It sounds like a case of "Come to town, Leave your money, and then leave and leave us alone."

Wow, did you say a mouthful.  So true.  I have to admit, I find the town's reaction unusual as well-at least from what I can gather from reading media reports and forums such as this.  I'm not there, so I don't know what happens on a day-to-day basis.  I also don't know the town dynamics.  To even begin to understand the town's perceived reaction, you have to understand its people.

For example, how is the relationship between citizens and law enforcement?  Are they suspicious of one another?  Do they trust one another?  Do they respect one another?  Are most residents long-time residents?  Or is a good percentage of the population transient?  What do the people do for a living?  Who is the major employer?  For those who've lived there any appreciable amount of time, why have they stayed?  What is the relationship among the citizenry?  Are there cliques?   Are there "gossip chains?"  And if so, do they focus on any particular person or perceived class of persons?  What is the citizen's view of the media?  What is the average education level?  What is the median age group?  What is the town's principal source of revenue?  What do the citizens do for fun, entertainment, or attraction?

The problem is we judge people through our own eyes.  I already know that if something like this ever happened close to my home, I'd be a basket case, even if the child wasn't mine.  I'd devote whatever time and resources I could toward finding him/her.  I can't imagine it any other way--that's just me--when it comes to children, no cost is too great.  So I automatically think others should react the same way.  To think that KaraK and others couldn't find someone to donate a small space for a "command center" was unbelievable to me, and perhaps symbolic of how financially distressed the area is.  Or perhaps there's a bigger issue of which all of us--except perhaps for the locals--can understand.

This is, of course, all just my opinion, and I certainly mean no disrespect to the citizens of McCleary.  They are going through a very stressful time right now.  The bottom line is that an 11 year old girl remains missing.  And that, alone, is heartbreaking to most people.




Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3
Post by: AZSunny on August 03, 2009, 03:28:06 PM
Private wells and septic tanks pose a danger to children.  Many old towns have private wells, most unused but sometimes not permanently sealed.  Septic tanks often have openings large enough for a small child to fall in, or otherwise.   Ditto underground water cisterns. 

Reading the McCleary City information I see that the city services supply water and sewer to most residents, but some in outlying areas of town use private wells and tanks.   Also, that gas station may have abandoned its old leaky underground storage tanks, but left them in place. 

So far I have not found local maps showing this detail.  Just worrying.

Chi-M

I wonder if a call to the city services water department could assist with this information?  They were helpful in providing information previously about the draining of the water. 


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3
Post by: no rose colored glasses on August 03, 2009, 03:43:51 PM
Private wells and septic tanks pose a danger to children.  Many old towns have private wells, most unused but sometimes not permanently sealed.  Septic tanks often have openings large enough for a small child to fall in, or otherwise.   Ditto underground water cisterns. 

Reading the McCleary City information I see that the city services supply water and sewer to most residents, but some in outlying areas of town use private wells and tanks.   Also, that gas station may have abandoned its old leaky underground storage tanks, but left them in place. 

So far I have not found local maps showing this detail.  Just worrying.

Chi-M

You have just brought up concerns that I posted much earlier in the thread, and the only answers that were ever forthcoming were "I don't know", to nothing. I am glad you brought it up again.
And also I'm going to bring up again, the smell, the smell while they were flushing the sewer system. To me that is a big deal, and could mask the smell of decomp.


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3
Post by: chi-monkey on August 03, 2009, 03:47:40 PM
Private wells and septic tanks pose a danger to children.  Many old towns have private wells, most unused but sometimes not permanently sealed.  Septic tanks often have openings large enough for a small child to fall in, or otherwise.   Ditto underground water cisterns. 

Reading the McCleary City information I see that the city services supply water and sewer to most residents, but some in outlying areas of town use private wells and tanks.   Also, that gas station may have abandoned its old leaky underground storage tanks, but left them in place. 

So far I have not found local maps showing this detail.  Just worrying.

Chi-M

You have just brought up concerns that I posted much earlier in the thread, and the only answers that were ever forthcoming were "I don't know", to nothing. I am glad you brought it up again.

At this point I know more about the sewage and drainage system in McCleary than any stranger should. LOL 

Interesting points I read were that the door company waste is held there before dumping into the city system part way to the treatment plant.   That the sewer system before its latest improvement project was so poor that some residents had broken through pipes or their basement floors to the sewer lines to dump drainage in directly.   Manhole covers are to weigh at least 120#.  (Way to heavy for a child to lift.)

I think there should be maps in the city or county offices showing water and drainage.  There are only 5 places in town where drainage can be seen from above ground, but a company doing their plans for the last upgrade ran cameras through the entire system.  Wish they could do that again.   

 Interesting point with the cameras, they found enormous flow from unknown and previously unmeasured source coming into the city system.   It was the door company which had hooked in with city workers help, but been forgotten.  Anyway,  I have no answers about this.   Let's keep looking.

Chi-M

         



Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3
Post by: no rose colored glasses on August 03, 2009, 03:49:43 PM
JessStar I see you have many questions about the town, I have asked over and over some of your questions, but I still don't know the answers. I'm frustrated, I know from growing up in a small town, people must be talking like crazy over this, I would just like to know what some of the people are thinking about Lindsey missing, my biggest question is are the kids out and about like before Lindsey went missing? There certainly seems to not be as big of concern like in some cases we have followed, maybe I'm wrong. Is LE telling parents to keep an eye on your kids, we have a kidnapper running around, are they warning the public?


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3
Post by: no rose colored glasses on August 03, 2009, 03:51:06 PM
Thanks chi-monkey   ::MonkeyCool::


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3
Post by: Lovinlife on August 03, 2009, 04:02:44 PM
I believe the county engineer's office should have the sewer and storm drain plans.  ICBW.


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3
Post by: Lovinlife on August 03, 2009, 04:15:17 PM
http://www.ecy.wa.gov/programs/wq/permits/permit_pdfs/mccleary/mccleary_fs.pdf

Maybe this will help someone  ::MonkeyConfused::


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3
Post by: JessStar on August 03, 2009, 04:16:59 PM
Here's a little information that gives us some idea of the demographics of McCleary:

According to the United States Census Bureau, the city has a total area of 1.8 square miles (4.7 km˛), of which, 1.8 square miles (4.7 km˛) of it is land and 0.55% is water.

As of the census[1] of 2000, there were 1,454 people, 555 households, and 376 families residing in the city.
The population density was 800.2 people per square mile (308.5/km˛).
There were 583 housing units at an average density of 320.9/sq mi (123.7/km˛).
The racial makeup of the city was 94.36% White, 0.21% African American, 0.89% Native American, 0.28% Asian, 0.76% from other races, and 3.51% from two or more races. Hispanic or Latino of any race were 2.20% of the population.

There were 555 households out of which 32.1% had children under the age of 18 living with them, 50.3% were married couples living together, 13.7% had a female householder with no husband present, and 32.1% were non-families.

27.2% of all households were made up of individuals and 13.2% had someone living alone who was 65 years of age or older.
The average household size was 2.48 and the average family size was 3.00.

In the city the population was spread out with 25.0% under the age of 18, 7.7% from 18 to 24, 27.0% from 25 to 44, 21.5% from 45 to 64, and 18.8% who were 65 years of age or older.

The median age was 38 years.

For every 100 females there were 91.1 males. For every 100 females age 18 and over, there were 87.0 males.

The median income for a household in the city was $30,769, and the median income for a family was $36,534. Males had a median income of $33,421 versus $25,417 for females. The per capita income for the city was $14,249. About 12.2% of families and 17.8% of the population were below the poverty line, including 22.9% of those under age 18 and 24.5% of those age 65 or over.


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3
Post by: JessStar on August 03, 2009, 04:21:58 PM
A little additional information comparing McCleary to Washington generally:

Estimated median household income in 2007:
McCleary:   $38,193
Washington:   $55,591


Estimated per capita income in 2007:
McCleary:   $17,580
Washington:   $29,027


Estimated median house or condo value in 2007:
McCleary:   $138,604
Washington:   $300,800


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3
Post by: atlanta_mom on August 03, 2009, 04:25:46 PM
Strange - today when I signed on there is only 1 guest.  A couple of weeks ago, there were 18 or 19 all the time.  What does this mean? 


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3
Post by: JessStar on August 03, 2009, 04:26:18 PM
This answers some of our questions and helps us get a feel for this seemingly quaint little town:

http://ftp.techline.com/infocus/mccleary.htm


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3
Post by: Fanny Mae on August 03, 2009, 04:26:26 PM
The storm drain system, sewer system, and water system would be one thing. The knowledge about abandoned water wells, septic tanks, and cisterns would probably only be documented in the memory of a long time WILLING McCleary resident. IMO


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3
Post by: Lovinlife on August 03, 2009, 04:27:57 PM
Strange - today when I signed on there is only 1 guest.  A couple of weeks ago, there were 18 or 19 all the time.  What does this mean? 
Guests are non-members who are here to read, or in some cases (like me sometimes) members who have not logged in (I forget ::MonkeyDevil:: )


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3
Post by: no rose colored glasses on August 03, 2009, 04:28:50 PM
This answers some of our questions and helps us get a feel for this seemingly quaint little town:

http://ftp.techline.com/infocus/mccleary.htm
Thanks JessStar


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3
Post by: Lovinlife on August 03, 2009, 04:31:55 PM
The storm drain system, sewer system, and water system would be one thing. The knowledge about abandoned water wells, septic tanks, and cisterns would probably only be documented in the memory of a long time WILLING McCleary resident. IMO
Good idea Fanny.  Some interesting reading here:


http://mcclearychamber.org/history.html
Although Simpson Logging Company improved the utilities prior to selling them to the Town, the need for adequate fire protection and a new sewer system soon became apparent. In 1952, a complete two-stage sewage treatment plant together with new water mains and a storage tank were constructed at a cost of $500,000.

So any home constructed before 1952 would have a well & a septic?  I'm a city girl, I'm not sure how that works.


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3
Post by: Fanny Mae on August 03, 2009, 04:36:46 PM
Strange - today when I signed on there is only 1 guest.  A couple of weeks ago, there were 18 or 19 all the time.  What does this mean? 

Maybe they don't like the company here posting.  ::MonkeyDevil::


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3
Post by: atlanta_mom on August 03, 2009, 04:41:03 PM
The storm drain system, sewer system, and water system would be one thing. The knowledge about abandoned water wells, septic tanks, and cisterns would probably only be documented in the memory of a long time WILLING McCleary resident. IMO
Good idea Fanny.  Some interesting reading here:


http://mcclearychamber.org/history.html
Although Simpson Logging Company improved the utilities prior to selling them to the Town, the need for adequate fire protection and a new sewer system soon became apparent. In 1952, a complete two-stage sewage treatment plant together with new water mains and a storage tank were constructed at a cost of $500,000.

So any home constructed before 1952 would have a well & a septic?  I'm a city girl, I'm not sure how that works.

Unfortunately, I know all about wells and sewer systems.  We have both.  3 months after we bought our house we started noticing a strange wet spot in the front yard.  We asked the previous owners if they knew anything about it.  He said it was a natural spring.  We later found out it was the septic lines that he "the previous owner" had pumped out every 3 months before they sold the house.  It cost us $10,000 to replace (it never passed county code either and we had to completely replace) ::MonkeyNoNo::


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3
Post by: atlanta_mom on August 03, 2009, 04:43:20 PM
I meant septic system ::MonkeyEek:: Sooooorry......


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3
Post by: JessStar on August 03, 2009, 04:44:24 PM
The storm drain system, sewer system, and water system would be one thing. The knowledge about abandoned water wells, septic tanks, and cisterns would probably only be documented in the memory of a long time WILLING McCleary resident. IMO
Good idea Fanny.  Some interesting reading here:


http://mcclearychamber.org/history.html
Although Simpson Logging Company improved the utilities prior to selling them to the Town, the need for adequate fire protection and a new sewer system soon became apparent. In 1952, a complete two-stage sewage treatment plant together with new water mains and a storage tank were constructed at a cost of $500,000.

So any home constructed before 1952 would have a well & a septic?  I'm a city girl, I'm not sure how that works.

If McCleary is like other places, updating to city water/sewage would have been required.  I'll leave that up to the locals to answer for sure, but this comes from the site I referenced above:

The water and sewer departments are up to date, and again very reasonable. Although the utilities are town owned, some of the outlying areas  are serviced for electricity by Grays Harbor PUD and have privately-owned water wells and septic tanks.



Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3
Post by: Fanny Mae on August 03, 2009, 04:44:49 PM
The storm drain system, sewer system, and water system would be one thing. The knowledge about abandoned water wells, septic tanks, and cisterns would probably only be documented in the memory of a long time WILLING McCleary resident. IMO
Good idea Fanny.  Some interesting reading here:


http://mcclearychamber.org/history.html
Although Simpson Logging Company improved the utilities prior to selling them to the Town, the need for adequate fire protection and a new sewer system soon became apparent. In 1952, a complete two-stage sewage treatment plant together with new water mains and a storage tank were constructed at a cost of $500,000.

So any home constructed before 1952 would have a well & a septic?  I'm a city girl, I'm not sure how that works.

I was a city girl too. But I do know that when my mama and daddy bought a house in the early '60 that was further out, it had a well and a septic tank. A few years later, the city came through and laid water and sewer pipes and offered the residents a cheaper rate if they hooked on at the time of construction. Most did, although my daddy kept the well going for irrigation of his garden, as long as the water pipes to the city service were seperate from the well water. The septic tanks were still there in every yard, and were sometimes filled with cement or fill. Some were not. Over the years, the grass grew over the opening, and unless you knew beforehand it was there, you would have never know it. It was that way in most yards in the neighborhood.

It would be that kind of information from someone living in the area at the time to be able to tell if this was so in McCleary. I doubt seriously if it would be in any public records.


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3
Post by: atlanta_mom on August 03, 2009, 04:52:36 PM
Most people don't take out the septic tanks because of the expense to do so.  I wanted our septic tank moved because it was so close to the front door.  Needless to say, I couldn't afford it so it is still there.  Also, the county codes keep most people from making decisions for themselves.  You have to have the county approve every step.


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3
Post by: atlanta_mom on August 03, 2009, 04:56:43 PM
Unfortunately, I have heard of a couple of cases where children have been found in a septic tank.  Most tanks are hard to get into though, so It always seem suspicious to me.


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3
Post by: Lovinlife on August 03, 2009, 04:58:53 PM
I think we scared everyone away with our sewer talk.  Fanny, I think you maybe on to something here.  If I understand correctly, just because you have city sewer & water does not necessarily mean you don't have an abandoned well & septic tank on your property.  Hmmmm. 


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3
Post by: JessStar on August 03, 2009, 05:10:16 PM
I'd surmise that very few people removed their septic systems. However, if the conversion took place over 50 years ago, the chances that they would still be accessible are probably slim. I'd be more concerned about abandoned wells. They're probably all over the place. JMO


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3
Post by: atlanta_mom on August 03, 2009, 05:11:49 PM
Do you think Lindsey may have fallen into an abandoned well or septic tank?  Abandoned wells have always scared me.  We had a property beside ours when I was a child that had a couple of abandoned wells.  The property had, at one time, been a little park that had performances and parties.  It had long ago been abandoned and the only evidence of the wells were metal sheets that covered it.  I was always afraid that one of our dogs would fall in.  They often went over there to play in the creek.  Alot of abandoned wells are not even covered adequately.


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3
Post by: A_News_Junkie_Monkey on August 03, 2009, 05:17:56 PM
Most people don't take out the septic tanks because of the expense to do so.  I wanted our septic tank moved because it was so close to the front door.  Needless to say, I couldn't afford it so it is still there.  Also, the county codes keep most people from making decisions for themselves.  You have to have the county approve every step.

I had a house where everything was on septic and when we got public utilities it was the homeowners responsibility and was strictly enforced that the tanks had to be filled with pea gravel and sealed.  Wonder if the regulations are that strict there? 

BTW - ChiMonkey - interesting post - you have been busy on this. 

Atlanta mom - I have noticed that on big news days the amount of guest goes up in a linear fashion to logged in monkeys.  When news is slow, few guests and often they are us - just not logged in yet!

Lets hope news comes soon about Lindsay.





Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3
Post by: Fanny Mae on August 03, 2009, 05:26:27 PM
Do you think Lindsey may have fallen into an abandoned well or septic tank?  Abandoned wells have always scared me.  We had a property beside ours when I was a child that had a couple of abandoned wells.  The property had, at one time, been a little park that had performances and parties.  It had long ago been abandoned and the only evidence of the wells were metal sheets that covered it.  I was always afraid that one of our dogs would fall in.  They often went over there to play in the creek.  Alot of abandoned wells are not even covered adequately.

I don't really think Lindsay "fell" into an abandoned well or septic tank because of the time she came up missing. It was getting dark and she was on her way home on the sidewalks and streets. But I certainly do think she could have been place there by someone in the area that knows of such things. JMO


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3
Post by: atlanta_mom on August 03, 2009, 05:29:17 PM
Sorry off the subject,
they found a body of juvenile boy close to where the little 8 yr old went missing. ::MonkeyWaa:: ::MonkeyWaa::


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3
Post by: Tamikosmom on August 03, 2009, 05:31:26 PM
What led LE to focus in and conduct "six" searches of Mullin Creek within four days of Lindsey Baum disappearance.

Is the location of this Creek search anywhere near that two block stretch between 5th on Maple and the Baum residence?

Thank you.

Janet

++++++

Search ramps up for McCleary girl
10:19 PM PDT on Tuesday, June 30, 2009


After four days, searchers say they're trying to remain optimistic. Today Grays Harbor County called in the State Patrol's plane for help.

More dogs were called out to look in the neighborhood where Lindsey was last seen walking home from a friend's house Friday night.

Every option is still on the table for police, who say Lindsey could have been injured, lost, kidnapped or just ran away.

"We have not found evidence, we have not found circumstances, witnesses or information that speaks specifically as to what happened to Lindsey," said Scott.

Instead of kids playing in Jim Mullin's creek, search dogs were back on his property. It's the sixth time his place has been searched.

http://www.king5.com/topstories/stories/NW_063009WAB-Mccleary-girl-search-LJ.1fc0b759.html



Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3
Post by: JessStar on August 03, 2009, 05:35:34 PM
I just heard that sad news atlanta mom. Apparently a young boy wearing a blue shirt was pulled from a canal near the rental home and suburban that was searched. While they haven't confirmed yet, it doesn't sound good. Police canceled the press cponference.


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3
Post by: Fanny Mae on August 03, 2009, 05:45:47 PM
O/T Robert Manwell breaking news.

http://scaredmonkeys.net/index.php?topic=5793.new#new


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3
Post by: JessStar on August 03, 2009, 06:42:03 PM
OT- I don't know where to put this, but our site was quoted on FoxNews this evening by Brett Baier (spelling?). He read a quote someone wrote about "Sara Palin Derangement Syndrome."



Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3
Post by: no rose colored glasses on August 03, 2009, 06:49:29 PM
OT- I don't know where to put this, but our site was quoted on FoxNews this evening by Brett Baier (spelling?). He read a quote someone wrote about "Sara Palin Derangement Syndrome."


  ::MonkeyCool::  Go to the blog on the front page, about three or four stories down.


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3
Post by: A_News_Junkie_Monkey on August 03, 2009, 06:49:52 PM
OT- I don't know where to put this, but our site was quoted on FoxNews this evening by Brett Baier (spelling?). He read a quote someone wrote about "Sara Palin Derangement Syndrome."



I show his show repeating at 4am EST on Fox,  I will record it, but maybe someone can record it for a you tube video so we can all see it!   (That is beyond my current skill set!)


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3
Post by: MuffyBee on August 03, 2009, 06:51:51 PM
OT- I don't know where to put this, but our site was quoted on FoxNews this evening by Brett Baier (spelling?). He read a quote someone wrote about "Sara Palin Derangement Syndrome."



JessStar, if it's OT, you might want to put it in musings, and we can take it from there.   ::MonkeyWink::  Thanks for bringing it. 


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3
Post by: MuffyBee on August 03, 2009, 06:52:53 PM
OT- I don't know where to put this, but our site was quoted on FoxNews this evening by Brett Baier (spelling?). He read a quote someone wrote about "Sara Palin Derangement Syndrome."


  ::MonkeyCool::  Go to the blog on the front page, about three or four stories down.

Thanks no rose  ::MonkeyCool::


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3
Post by: JessStar on August 03, 2009, 06:55:51 PM
Will do- thanks MuffyBee. You learn something new every day!


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3
Post by: Tracygirl on August 03, 2009, 07:20:17 PM
Fanny Mae, I recently had the same reaction as you are having to what tracygirl is saying. But it was in connection with Nevaeh-a little girl that (probably because of her tender age), really brought me to my knees. I'm a big hockey fan. I remember watching some of the stanley cup finals (the Detroit Redwings were playing), and watching all the Detroit fans cheering in their seats thinking "How could they!  A little girl is missing from your community, and you are watching hockey and cheering!"  That was my state of mind. But I had to realize that yes, life must go on. Nevaeh would want it that way, I'm sure. That doesn't mean for one second that I have forgotten about her. She is still in my thoughts and prayers, much like Sandra Cantu is.

I appreciate you noticing my distress over this. Monroe Mi is not in Detroit, but is a small community between Toledo and Detroit. Tracy, Ca is not the biggest place in the world either. but I remember the outpouring and the news and television ongoing reports. And the interviews going on with citizens who were beside themselves with worry. And the huge outporings of attendence for their vigils and memorials in both places. Yes, I guess life goes on, but the loss of a child in the area is still the topmost concern until they are found.

I have seen nothing like that in McCleary, Wa. I realize it is an out of the way place, probably someplace that most of us have never been to or lived in. It is just unfathomable to me that so many people in such a small place know nothing, and would just to prefer it to be that way. If the LE and the people in such a situation make it uncomfortable for media and outsiders to be there, they will leave. A simple fact. And it seems to be deliberately so.

As far as my remarks for the Bear Festival going on so close to the time of Lindsay being missing, now we are hearing how the city and the LE are underfunded, and the Grays County Sheriff's Office is thinking of cuts. I guess it looks to me like priotities of a missing child vesus disappointing this year's Bear Festival participants were measured, and guess who won? Ok, flyers were handed out to a few more people than those that live right in town. How did that work out for them? It sounds like a case of "Come to town, Leave your money, and then leave and leave us alone."

Fanny I know it is difficult. When the sandra cantu search was happening, sure there was what seemed like a lot of seachers but less then 3% of the people were actually active in the search. Tracy has a population of about 80,000 people believe it or not and it was said about 2000 people volunteered and not all were from Tracy. While she was missing it was a topic of conversation sure, but most people just went on with their daily lives. Kids played outside, sometimes by themselves, I saw young girl walking alone down the street believe it or not. There were baseball games, little league was starting up the season...I don't think no town ever just stops, I wish it would but that is not realistic I suppose. 
The memorial was visited by many people around that direct area which is heavily hispanic and catholic. Sandra was missing for what was it, 8-10 days before she was found? Lindsey has been lost now for so much longer. No matter how we wish everyone would stop and just look under ever stone, in every water way, in every single place, it just doesn't happen. I don't think it is because people don't care, it is because they can't handle the emotions of it all. As humans we need to protect ourselves so we survive. Sadly it is because of this I believe people just move on.
I find it frustrating to not be able to be there in McCleary. I was actually considering going there believe it or not but then we lost my fil and I had to use my time for that. I want to walk down the path she is said to have taken, speak to the people she knew, just watch and see what I can find...
I hope and pray LE can find this little girl soon, I pray she is alive and can be re-united again with her family. After reading about the body found in Idaho, poor little Robert, I have a son who is 9  ::MonkeyWaa::


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3
Post by: Tamikosmom on August 03, 2009, 07:22:32 PM
OT- I don't know where to put this, but our site was quoted on FoxNews this evening by Brett Baier (spelling?). He read a quote someone wrote about "Sara Palin Derangement Syndrome."



DIVORCE … NOT!!! Sarah & Todd Palin Divorce Rumors … Just More Lies from the Moonbat LEFT
http://scaredmonkeys.com/2009/08/01/divorce-not-sarah-todd-palin-divorce-rumors-just-more-lies-from-the-moonbat-left/


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3
Post by: Fanny Mae on August 03, 2009, 08:44:35 PM
Snipped from the statement that was made in the past few minutes from Deputy Sheriff Jim Kerns, Ada Country Sheriff's office in reference to the body found that could be 8 yr old Robert Manwell's in a canal near Kuna, Idaho.

“A missing child is every family’s nightmare, and a nightmare for an entire community," Kerns said.

My question is, where is the same passion in McCleary, Wa?



Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3
Post by: Heidismom on August 03, 2009, 10:00:48 PM
Snipped from the statement that was made in the past few minutes from Deputy Sheriff Jim Kerns, Ada Country Sheriff's office in reference to the body found that could be 8 yr old Robert Manwell's in a canal near Kuna, Idaho.

“A missing child is every family’s nightmare, and a nightmare for an entire community," Kerns said.

My question is, where is the same passion in McCleary, Wa?


Excuse Me???   We are not exactly Boise, or Kuna, either!


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3
Post by: AZSunny on August 03, 2009, 10:16:32 PM
Snipped from the statement that was made in the past few minutes from Deputy Sheriff Jim Kerns, Ada Country Sheriff's office in reference to the body found that could be 8 yr old Robert Manwell's in a canal near Kuna, Idaho.

“A missing child is every family’s nightmare, and a nightmare for an entire community," Kerns said.

My question is, where is the same passion in McCleary, Wa?


Excuse Me???   We are not exactly Boise, or Kuna, either!

Heidi, I agree.  I think it is ludicurious that anyone would think there isn't the passion and concern for finding Lindsey. That is just a small number of posters opinion.  It is just a smaller, less vocal community with a lot less police support and a lot less recourses.  Don't let that type of posts concern you.  I think the biggest problem you are facing is the lack of press coverage to keep Lindsey in the news. I am shocked that the KOMO's and the KING TV of the Seattle world aren't providing more coverage to keep the news current.  Keep up the good fight! 


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3
Post by: AZSunny on August 03, 2009, 10:19:21 PM
Snipped from the statement that was made in the past few minutes from Deputy Sheriff Jim Kerns, Ada Country Sheriff's office in reference to the body found that could be 8 yr old Robert Manwell's in a canal near Kuna, Idaho.

“A missing child is every family’s nightmare, and a nightmare for an entire community," Kerns said.

My question is, where is the same passion in McCleary, Wa?


Excuse Me???   We are not exactly Boise, or Kuna, either!

Heidi, I agree.  I think it is ludicrous that anyone would think there isn't the passion and concern for finding Lindsey. That is just a small number of posters opinion.  It is just a smaller, less vocal community with a lot less police support and a lot less resource's Don't let that type of posts concern you.  I think the biggest problem you are facing is the lack of press coverage to keep Lindsey in the news. I am shocked that the KOMO's and the KING TV of the Seattle world aren't providing more coverage to keep the news current.  Keep up the good fight! 

SELF EDIT---sorry-


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3
Post by: AZSunny on August 03, 2009, 10:21:07 PM
Snipped from the statement that was made in the past few minutes from Deputy Sheriff Jim Kerns, Ada Country Sheriff's office in reference to the body found that could be 8 yr old Robert Manwell's in a canal near Kuna, Idaho.

“A missing child is every family’s nightmare, and a nightmare for an entire community," Kerns said.

My question is, where is the same passion in McCleary, Wa?



Is that a question, or a statement.  Looks like a judgemental statement to me.


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3
Post by: Heidismom on August 03, 2009, 10:41:13 PM
Snipped from the statement that was made in the past few minutes from Deputy Sheriff Jim Kerns, Ada Country Sheriff's office in reference to the body found that could be 8 yr old Robert Manwell's in a canal near Kuna, Idaho.

“A missing child is every family’s nightmare, and a nightmare for an entire community," Kerns said.

My question is, where is the same passion in McCleary, Wa?


Excuse Me???   We are not exactly Boise, or Kuna, either!

Heidi, I agree.  I think it is ludicurious that anyone would think there isn't the passion and concern for finding Lindsey. That is just a small number of posters opinion.  It is just a smaller, less vocal community with a lot less police support and a lot less recourses.  Don't let that type of posts concern you.  I think the biggest problem you are facing is the lack of press coverage to keep Lindsey in the news. I am shocked that the KOMO's and the KING TV of the Seattle world aren't providing more coverage to keep the news current.  Keep up the good fight! 
Thank You.  The Olympia paper was very lax in its coverage, & we are only 20 miles away. It was several days before they even mentioned Lindsey. The vigils could be advertised more. I personally knew nothing about the last one til the day after.  A friend told me the vigil was very briefly mentioned on one newscast, and I saw a large poster on the corner across from the park, but many of us do not go by there routinely

For whoever asked about the changes in town, no, I don't see children out playing or riding bikes nearly as much.  We were already considered overprotective, now the poor kids are barely out of sight.


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3
Post by: AZSunny on August 03, 2009, 10:49:52 PM
Snipped from the statement that was made in the past few minutes from Deputy Sheriff Jim Kerns, Ada Country Sheriff's office in reference to the body found that could be 8 yr old Robert Manwell's in a canal near Kuna, Idaho.

“A missing child is every family’s nightmare, and a nightmare for an entire community," Kerns said.

My question is, where is the same passion in McCleary, Wa?


Excuse Me???   We are not exactly Boise, or Kuna, either!

Heidi, I agree.  I think it is ludicurious that anyone would think there isn't the passion and concern for finding Lindsey. That is just a small number of posters opinion.  It is just a smaller, less vocal community with a lot less police support and a lot less recourses.  Don't let that type of posts concern you.  I think the biggest problem you are facing is the lack of press coverage to keep Lindsey in the news. I am shocked that the KOMO's and the KING TV of the Seattle world aren't providing more coverage to keep the news current.  Keep up the good fight! 
Thank You.  The Olympia paper was very lax in its coverage, & we are only 20 miles away. It was several days before they even mentioned Lindsey. The vigils could be advertised more. I personally knew nothing about the last one til the day after.  A friend told me the vigil was very briefly mentioned on one newscast, and I saw a large poster on the corner across from the park, but many of us do not go by there routinely

For whoever asked about the changes in town, no, I don't see children out playing or riding bikes nearly as much.  We were already considered overprotective, now the poor kids are barely out of sight.

I would be overprotective too!  I have 3 granddaughters that live in Maple Valley, and I am emailing their parents constantly to be watchful!   

Why would the Olympia paper not be banner headling this when she went missing? 

How sad that the kids can't enjoy the freedom anymore of feeling safe in a small community.  Are you seeing officers in the area continuing the search efforts?  Most of us are all from such larger cities, that it is hard to imagine life in a very small town.  The dynamics must be very different. 


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3
Post by: Sister on August 03, 2009, 11:05:15 PM
Heidismom, do you know if they did find a location for the "information" center.  (I can't remember the name of the group seeking it.  Maybe some other monkey can recall).  I just remember that it was reported they were having a difficult time finding a place.  I too live in a very small community and the resources for something of this magnitude . . . well, there just aren't any.  I am sure the community is concerned, compassionate, and troubled.  Just because it's not reported in the news, doesn't make it not true.  In fact, many threads back, there was an article about why this case is not getting the coverage it rightly deserves.  I pray every morning and every night for Lindsey's safe return and for the safety of everyone in this community.  It must be an absolutely frightening time.  Blessings to all of you and thank you for posting.


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3
Post by: Heidismom on August 03, 2009, 11:24:15 PM
Heidismom, do you know if they did find a location for the "information" center.  (I can't remember the name of the group seeking it.  Maybe some other monkey can recall).  I just remember that it was reported they were having a difficult time finding a place.  I too live in a very small community and the resources for something of this magnitude . . . well, there just aren't any.  I am sure the community is concerned, compassionate, and troubled.  Just because it's not reported in the news, doesn't make it not true.  In fact, many threads back, there was an article about why this case is not getting the coverage it rightly deserves.  I pray every morning and every night for Lindsey's safe return and for the safety of everyone in this community.  It must be an absolutely frightening time.  Blessings to all of you and thank you for posting.

I see a Gray's Harbor Sheriff car at the police  station from time to time,  haven't really seen them searching from my location lately, not even on those days they brought the cadaver dogs in. 
I don't know anything about the center, If they get it going, I will check it out, & see what I can do.

Goodnight


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3
Post by: JessStar on August 04, 2009, 08:40:47 AM
You know, the unfortunate fact is that the media is all about sensationalism.  And they have the power of the pulpit.  Until something sensational happens, they don't care.  They don't care about keeping the story alive.  They don't care that just a 20-30 second spot on the nightly news can help keep the memory, the energy, the wherewithal to find this little girl, alive and burning strong.  So the story "disappears."  But you can bet your sweet rear that the minute something breaks, it will be all over the news like flies on doo doo.  And then they'll act like they care--they'll act like they've cared all along.  And it's complete bull.  If they cared, they'd take 20 or 30 seconds away from the "Michael Jackson" debacle and devote it to finding Lindsey.  Is that too much to ask?

Main stream and cable media condemns tabloid news reporting but, the fact is, they're no different.  It's like that Don Henley song "Dirty Laundry."  Until there's a "sensational" story, there is no story.  Plain and simple.  So it's up to us "common" people to get the story out and keep it alive. And that's a feat in and of itself.

Ok, I'll get off my soap box now.  But I'm feeling the frustration that a lot of people are feeling.  I can't see how a 10 year old girl can just disappear without a trace.  And to think that the effort to find her is being limited by the almighty dollar is simply sinful.  It's times like this I wish I had the money of Oprah Winfrey or Bill Gates.  Who needs billions to live on anyway?

Sorry, I rant and rave.  Oh, and Good Morning everyone.  I'm hoping and praying that today is the day Lindsey comes home.  And that Nevaeh's murderer is arrested.  And that Melissa Huckaby is indicted.  And that Haleigh Cummings comes home.  And that Robert Manwill is given justice.  The list goes on . . .



Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3
Post by: Sister on August 04, 2009, 09:07:37 AM
Jess, good morning.  I totally agree with you -- rant on!
Lindsey is wanted at home!


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3
Post by: Lovinlife on August 04, 2009, 09:52:54 AM
(http://www.king5.com/localnews/stories/D_IMAGE.1223cc986ef.93.88.fa.d0.6d5d40.jpg)

Lindsey Baum-Still Missing

Where are you Lindsey?


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3
Post by: A_News_Junkie_Monkey on August 04, 2009, 10:30:21 AM
You know, the unfortunate fact is that the media is all about sensationalism.  And they have the power of the pulpit.  Until something sensational happens, they don't care.  They don't care about keeping the story alive.  They don't care that just a 20-30 second spot on the nightly news can help keep the memory, the energy, the wherewithal to find this little girl, alive and burning strong.  So the story "disappears."  But you can bet your sweet rear that the minute something breaks, it will be all over the news like flies on doo doo.  And then they'll act like they care--they'll act like they've cared all along.  And it's complete bull.  If they cared, they'd take 20 or 30 seconds away from the "Michael Jackson" debacle and devote it to finding Lindsey.  Is that too much to ask?

Main stream and cable media condemns tabloid news reporting but, the fact is, they're no different.  It's like that Don Henley song "Dirty Laundry."  Until there's a "sensational" story, there is no story.  Plain and simple.  So it's up to us "common" people to get the story out and keep it alive. And that's a feat in and of itself.

Ok, I'll get off my soap box now.  But I'm feeling the frustration that a lot of people are feeling.  I can't see how a 10 year old girl can just disappear without a trace.  And to think that the effort to find her is being limited by the almighty dollar is simply sinful.  It's times like this I wish I had the money of Oprah Winfrey or Bill Gates.  Who needs billions to live on anyway?

Sorry, I rant and rave.  Oh, and Good Morning everyone.  I'm hoping and praying that today is the day Lindsey comes home.  And that Nevaeh's murderer is arrested.  And that Melissa Huckaby is indicted.  And that Haleigh Cummings comes home.  And that Robert Manwill is given justice.  The list goes on . . .



I totally agree!   I am so sick of MJ for 45 min to an hour on JVM and NG I could puke!  So............
WHO WANTS TO START A LETTER CAMPAIGN?     Lets all write to JVM, NG, Gretta and other shows and tell them we want investigative reporting back.  I am going to ask them all if they will email me when they get off the MJ train and back to important news - especially information about all these missing children.  Anyone else in?  Thank you JessStar for inspiring me!


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3 7/28/09 -
Post by: no rose colored glasses on August 04, 2009, 10:44:09 AM
blownaway 
Registered User   Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: McCleary
Posts: 6 
 
Crazy....I just went to town and saw JB and his Mom. He was riding his new bike (looked like a new one) listening to his IPOD or something. I noticed him riding toward the intersection in his own little world. I slowed way down in case he decided to fly out onto Mommson or something, Mom was sitting on the front lawn in a chair....It must be hard waiting for a child to come home not knowing if she will EVER even return...

There was also a very strange lady asking about the case at Gordons Grocery, the cashier was tweaked by her also. I wish I saw where the lady went..It was almost like she was probing to see if the cops had told them any secrets about the case there at the grocery store. The cashier did say that LE wanted them to look out for strange people but she said "it would be easier to look for normal people,there are less of them..".
(I just read this on WS, thought it was interesting)


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3 7/28/09 -
Post by: A_News_Junkie_Monkey on August 04, 2009, 10:50:05 AM
 ::MonkeyCheer2::     All the media links!     ::MonkeyCheer2::

Part 1:  A-N    http://my.barackobama.com/page/community/post/psdunc/gGB8bS

Part 2:  M-Z    http://my.barackobama.com/page/community/post/psdunc/gGB8HG

I am hoping most of these are still up to date!  I might have to keep this or maybe a mod can copy it and paste it as a resource for future? 
Leave it to the political campaigns to have this! LOL


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3 7/28/09 -
Post by: A_News_Junkie_Monkey on August 04, 2009, 10:53:16 AM
blownaway 
Registered User   Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: McCleary
Posts: 6 
 
Crazy....I just went to town and saw JB and his Mom. He was riding his new bike (looked like a new one) listening to his IPOD or something. I noticed him riding toward the intersection in his own little world. I slowed way down in case he decided to fly out onto Mommson or something, Mom was sitting on the front lawn in a chair....It must be hard waiting for a child to come home not knowing if she will EVER even return...

There was also a very strange lady asking about the case at Gordons Grocery, the cashier was tweaked by her also. I wish I saw where the lady went..It was almost like she was probing to see if the cops had told them any secrets about the case there at the grocery store. The cashier did say that LE wanted them to look out for strange people but she said "it would be easier to look for normal people,there are less of them..".
(I just read this on WS, thought it was interesting)

Thanks No Rose - that is interesting.  I can't help but wonder if the lady asking at the grocery is one of us or a ws person!   Come us, fess up who was at Gordons Grocery asking questions! LOL


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3 7/28/09 -
Post by: no rose colored glasses on August 04, 2009, 10:59:51 AM
blownaway 
Registered User   Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: McCleary
Posts: 6 
 
Crazy....I just went to town and saw JB and his Mom. He was riding his new bike (looked like a new one) listening to his IPOD or something. I noticed him riding toward the intersection in his own little world. I slowed way down in case he decided to fly out onto Mommson or something, Mom was sitting on the front lawn in a chair....It must be hard waiting for a child to come home not knowing if she will EVER even return...

There was also a very strange lady asking about the case at Gordons Grocery, the cashier was tweaked by her also. I wish I saw where the lady went..It was almost like she was probing to see if the cops had told them any secrets about the case there at the grocery store. The cashier did say that LE wanted them to look out for strange people but she said "it would be easier to look for normal people,there are less of them..".
(I just read this on WS, thought it was interesting)

Thanks No Rose - that is interesting.  I can't help but wonder if the lady asking at the grocery is one of us or a ws person!   Come us, fess up who was at Gordons Grocery asking questions! LOL
I didn't even give that a thought  ::MonkeyConfused:: I must need more coffee.


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3 7/28/09 -
Post by: klaasend on August 04, 2009, 11:10:16 AM
ANJ - I've created a thread in this forum for Media Contacts so your lists don't get lost.  Thanks!


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3 7/28/09 -
Post by: A_News_Junkie_Monkey on August 04, 2009, 11:22:52 AM
ANJ - I've created a thread in this forum for Media Contacts so your lists don't get lost.  Thanks!

Thank you - I copied and pasted the full lists too, as that site looks very inactive and if it get taken down this list looks very comprehensive! 


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3 7/28/09 -
Post by: Edward on August 04, 2009, 11:33:49 AM
blownaway 
Registered User   Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: McCleary
Posts: 6 
 
Crazy....I just went to town and saw JB and his Mom. He was riding his new bike (looked like a new one) listening to his IPOD or something. I noticed him riding toward the intersection in his own little world. I slowed way down in case he decided to fly out onto Mommson or something, Mom was sitting on the front lawn in a chair....It must be hard waiting for a child to come home not knowing if she will EVER even return...

There was also a very strange lady asking about the case at Gordons Grocery, the cashier was tweaked by her also. I wish I saw where the lady went..It was almost like she was probing to see if the cops had told them any secrets about the case there at the grocery store. The cashier did say that LE wanted them to look out for strange people but she said "it would be easier to look for normal people,there are less of them..".
(I just read this on WS, thought it was interesting)

Thanks No Rose - that is interesting.  I can't help but wonder if the lady asking at the grocery is one of us or a ws person!   Come us, fess up who was at Gordons Grocery asking questions! LOL

Many showed up to Aruba..
No doubt one of us showed up to Gordons grocery in McCleary Washington.

Sounds like a private investigator..  ::MonkeyWink::


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3 7/28/09 -
Post by: no rose colored glasses on August 04, 2009, 04:35:36 PM
So sad to see no progress  ::MonkeyNoNo::


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3 7/28/09 -
Post by: no rose colored glasses on August 04, 2009, 09:14:36 PM
Where is everybody? And where is Lindsey?  ::MonkeyNoNo::


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3 7/28/09 -
Post by: Leroy on August 04, 2009, 09:24:08 PM
Where is everybody? And where is Lindsey?  ::MonkeyNoNo::

My thoughts exactly NoRose  ::MonkeyNoNo:: 


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3 7/28/09 -
Post by: no rose colored glasses on August 04, 2009, 09:28:27 PM
Where is everybody? And where is Lindsey?  ::MonkeyNoNo::

My thoughts exactly NoRose  ::MonkeyNoNo:: 
I'm getting worried, and sure hope LE is working hard behind the scenes.


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3 7/28/09 -
Post by: MuffyBee on August 04, 2009, 09:34:56 PM
Where is everybody? And where is Lindsey?  ::MonkeyNoNo::

My thoughts exactly NoRose  ::MonkeyNoNo:: 
I'm getting worried, and sure hope LE is working hard behind the scenes.

You're right.  She's been missing since 6/26/09.   It's  been too long.  Time to bring Lindsey home.

 ::MonkeyAngel::

Please say a prayer and light a candle for Lindsey, that she will be found.
http://www.gratefulness.org/candles/candles.cfm?l=eng&gi=FLB



Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3 7/28/09 -
Post by: JessStar on August 04, 2009, 10:17:05 PM
I wish something would break in this case soon. It's just so darn frustrating when you know someone is out there that knows it all, but doesn't have the conscience or the courage to come forward. If all of these cases have anything in common, it's that all the perps are total cowards that have to prey on the young and defenseless because the perps are too worthless and weak to do otherwise. Total cowards- each and every one of them. What a waste of a carbon foot print.

Things might be quiet today, but that doesn't mean we've forgotten. I pray for these kids every night. I advocate for them every day. They keep me up at night.


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3 7/28/09 -
Post by: AZSunny on August 04, 2009, 10:46:06 PM
Where is DD??? What are you working on that you are so quiet here?? 


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3 7/28/09 -
Post by: mamacrazy30 on August 04, 2009, 11:08:46 PM
Where is DD??? What are you working on that you are so quiet here?? 
its easy to find DD if you look


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3 7/28/09 -
Post by: AZSunny on August 05, 2009, 12:22:56 AM
Where is DD??? What are you working on that you are so quiet here?? 
its easy to find DD if you look

As usual, I have no idea what you are talking about.


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3 7/28/09 -
Post by: Tracygirl on August 05, 2009, 01:00:52 AM
I think I read DD was going to spend some time researching. Maybe she will come back and share with us what she finds. I hope so, she has been a great source of logic, insight and pure instinct on many of these cases. I have learned so much from her. 


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3 7/28/09 -
Post by: A_News_Junkie_Monkey on August 05, 2009, 09:16:13 AM
Where is DD??? What are you working on that you are so quiet here?? 
its easy to find DD if you look

As usual, I have no idea what you are talking about.

AZSunny - I think she has been busy arranging her files on her site.  Trying to get all the missing kids possibly connected and other cases she has a passion for together.  Here is the link:  http://truecrime.forums-free.com
Hope that helps - and I sure hope we have new information on this case soon.


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3 7/28/09 -
Post by: no rose colored glasses on August 05, 2009, 09:33:55 AM
I sure hope we have no information on this case soon also.


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3 7/28/09 -
Post by: AZSunny on August 05, 2009, 12:59:24 PM
Where is DD??? What are you working on that you are so quiet here?? 
its easy to find DD if you look

As usual, I have no idea what you are talking about.

AZSunny - I think she has been busy arranging her files on her site.  Trying to get all the missing kids possibly connected and other cases she has a passion for together.  Here is the link:  http://truecrime.forums-free.com
Hope that helps - and I sure hope we have new information on this case soon.

Thanks ANJ and Tracygirl..I was concerned because I know she was frustrated a few days ago.   We need a break here, I wish more locals would post and share info, or gossip or anything they are hearing or seeing.  It would give us a string to hold on to.  This no news is so frustrating. 


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3 7/28/09 -
Post by: AZSunny on August 05, 2009, 01:02:40 PM
I sure hope we have no information on this case soon also.


I think you meant "new"...correct??  ::MonkeyHaHa::


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3 7/28/09 -
Post by: JessStar on August 05, 2009, 01:10:07 PM
I can't believe how quiet this case has been. It is so frustrating. Does anyone know if they've ever set up the command center?


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3 7/28/09 -
Post by: no rose colored glasses on August 05, 2009, 02:06:44 PM
I sure hope we have no information on this case soon also.


I think you meant "new"...correct??  ::MonkeyHaHa::

  ::MonkeyDevil2::  I'll blame lack of coffee and frustration on that one. I usually read before I post, but I guess not this time.


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3 7/28/09 -
Post by: no rose colored glasses on August 05, 2009, 02:07:17 PM
I can't believe how quiet this case has been. It is so frustrating. Does anyone know if they've ever set up the command center?

I have no idea, haven't heard anything  ::MonkeyNoNo::


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3 7/28/09 -
Post by: sunshine12 on August 05, 2009, 02:41:04 PM
this case is so frustrating because i feel like on this board we have seriously ran through almost every possible scenario from the most obvious to the more confusing ones. without anything from the police or any more definitive facts i fear that this case could go cold. i really  really really hope and pray that LE has information and leads they arent telling the public but i just don't know anymore...

im praying lindsey will be found soon the silence is depressing and frustrating


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3 7/28/09 -
Post by: no rose colored glasses on August 05, 2009, 02:45:39 PM
this case is so frustrating because i feel like on this board we have seriously ran through almost every possible scenario from the most obvious to the more confusing ones. without anything from the police or any more definitive facts i fear that this case could go cold. i really  really really hope and pray that LE has information and leads they arent telling the public but i just don't know anymore...

im praying lindsey will be found soon the silence is depressing and frustrating
I think so also, I don't know what other scenario one could come up with.


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3 7/28/09 -
Post by: A_News_Junkie_Monkey on August 05, 2009, 02:55:57 PM
Where is DD??? What are you working on that you are so quiet here?? 
its easy to find DD if you look

As usual, I have no idea what you are talking about.

AZSunny - I think she has been busy arranging her files on her site.  Trying to get all the missing kids possibly connected and other cases she has a passion for together.  Here is the link:  http://truecrime.forums-free.com
Hope that helps - and I sure hope we have new information on this case soon.

Thanks ANJ and Tracygirl..I was concerned because I know she was frustrated a few days ago.   We need a break here, I wish more locals would post and share info, or gossip or anything they are hearing or seeing.  It would give us a string to hold on to.  This no news is so frustrating. 

I sensed many getting fustrated a few days ago.  I got more frustrated at our emotions as posters (collectively) getting in the way of respectfully disagreeing.   It never helps when it gets personal.  Seems the thread has cooled in part due to that (IMHO) and in large part due to lack of news.


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3 7/28/09 -
Post by: no rose colored glasses on August 05, 2009, 03:48:49 PM
I agree with you  ::MonkeyNoNo::  I wish we would have some idea what LE is doing right now, if they have any leads or if they just have no idea what happened.


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3 7/28/09 -
Post by: KarmaRoundUp on August 05, 2009, 06:25:31 PM
http://findlindseybaum.com/1852.html

They have produced a new Ebook on Prevention & Education for parents to help keep their children safer.

NEW FREE PREVENTION AND EDUCATION EBOOK FOR PARENTS AND CHILDREN: A Missing Child is Everyone's Child




Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3 7/28/09 -
Post by: Edward on August 05, 2009, 07:24:24 PM
This case is very dependant on 2 things..
Witness and Survalliance video.
If they have No Witness to her walking..Then the last one to see her is it..
If they have no checked every single video survalliance cam within 100 miles of travel "approximate 2 hours out in every direction" then shame on LE.. Because who ever took her had to travel and had to stop for fuel..

Plus LE is now dependant on Santa Barbra Sherriff to interview a fellow who made an attempted abduction in Southern California with a white van that had Washington plates..

IF the Santa Barbra Sherriff can not prove anything on the white van then they are back to square one.

It was too late at night when Lindsey walked home....
Not that many cars are our driving around at that time in a small town..
Somebody had to have seen the culprits car.. OR it was one of the people who live in the neighborhood.

jmho


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3 7/28/09 -
Post by: Edward on August 05, 2009, 07:25:46 PM
Forgot to hit the spell checker again..Sorry in between telephone calls.. lol


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3 7/28/09 -
Post by: no rose colored glasses on August 05, 2009, 07:26:15 PM
I think it was one of the people in the neighborhood.


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3 7/28/09 -
Post by: Edward on August 05, 2009, 07:28:22 PM
Most likely they have interviewed the culprit.. Proving it is him/her is another thing.


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3 7/28/09 -
Post by: Sister on August 05, 2009, 07:30:55 PM
No rose, I agree with you.  I think it is someone who lives there or was staying there (ie, like visiting).  As Edward pointed out, it would only take a hour or two to be so far away.  I wish I knew about the command center too.  I know they were having a difficult finding a place to sit it up.  That too is a puzzlement.


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3 7/28/09 -
Post by: pink angel on August 05, 2009, 11:56:49 PM
No rose, I agree with you.  I think it is someone who lives there or was staying there (ie, like visiting).  As Edward pointed out, it would only take a hour or two to be so far away.  I wish I knew about the command center too.  I know they were having a difficult finding a place to sit it up.  That too is a puzzlement.

They should just put up tables and run the command center from the front lawn. They ran it from tables outside in a K-mart parking lot for Nevaeh. Something has to be done for Lindsey.

It makes me sad all these children, months going by and still no closer to them being found. What a nightmare for any family to through. I can't imagine.



Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3 7/28/09 -
Post by: Scandi on August 06, 2009, 02:07:19 AM
Hi Everyone,  We all know it is the little things in a case that can make a huge difference in the solving of it.  And we need to discover what in the world happened to Lindsey so she can be brought home where she belongs.

I have a thought based on something I read here and want to PM someone.  I have never needed to do this here and don't see a PM opportunity listed.

It would be directed to a poster who is very familiar with all the posts written by those in the know here.  I see some gray areas in what a poster has written and think it might be valuable in learning about the true circumstances that night when Lindsey fell off the face of the earth. 

xox 


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3 7/28/09 -
Post by: pink angel on August 06, 2009, 04:49:45 AM
scandi you can email klaas and ask her pass along your email information to whichever poster you want to contact.

her email is klaas (at) scaredmonkeys.com


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3 7/28/09 -
Post by: Lovinlife on August 06, 2009, 09:57:56 AM
(http://tbn2.google.com/images?q=tbn:6ofytYSDPAWhtM:http://www.co.grays-harbor.wa.us/info/sheriff/Special/Images/BaumLindsey4.jpg)

Lindsey Baum-Still Missing

Where are you Lindsey?


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3 7/28/09 -
Post by: no rose colored glasses on August 06, 2009, 10:12:52 AM
(http://tbn2.google.com/images?q=tbn:6ofytYSDPAWhtM:http://www.co.grays-harbor.wa.us/info/sheriff/Special/Images/BaumLindsey4.jpg)

Lindsey Baum-Still Missing

Where are you Lindsey?
Yes, where are you, I just think someone saw something, maybe they are afraid, I don't know.


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3 7/28/09 -
Post by: Lovinlife on August 06, 2009, 10:26:25 AM
NRCG ~ I pray that the silence from the sheriff's office & media indicate that behind the scenes work is being done.  I think of Tori Stafford's parents holding daily pressers & even though it was extremely difficult on the family, it kept Tori's case from growing cold.  Someone in or around that little town in WA knows something.  I hope their conscience eats them alive until they have to talk.


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3 7/28/09 -
Post by: no rose colored glasses on August 06, 2009, 10:27:59 AM
NRCG ~ I pray that the silence from the sheriff's office & media indicate that behind the scenes work is being done.  I think of Tori Stafford's parents holding daily pressers & even though it was extremely difficult on the family, it kept Tori's case from growing cold.  Someone in or around that little town in WA knows something.  I hope their conscience eats them alive until they have to talk.
I agree, something is and has been off with this case from the start, at least for me. Lindsey didn't vanish into thin air, though I will admit some of these cases it certainly seems like that  ::MonkeyConfused::


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3 7/28/09 -
Post by: A_News_Junkie_Monkey on August 06, 2009, 10:50:32 AM
Hi Everyone,  We all know it is the little things in a case that can make a huge difference in the solving of it.  And we need to discover what in the world happened to Lindsey so she can be brought home where she belongs.

I have a thought based on something I read here and want to PM someone.  I have never needed to do this here and don't see a PM opportunity listed.

It would be directed to a poster who is very familiar with all the posts written by those in the know here.  I see some gray areas in what a poster has written and think it might be valuable in learning about the true circumstances that night when Lindsey fell off the face of the earth. 

xox 

I take it you can't share here?  If you find that you can, please post it as it might spark something else to go on!  If you can't, I do understand. 


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3 7/28/09 -
Post by: KarmaRoundUp on August 06, 2009, 12:09:21 PM
Good morning Monkeys

In this video at the 51 second mark is a house,kinda light blue'ish/white'ish.The front yard(or backyard)looks filled with junk.Does anyone think this house is the same as the pool house that Lindsey went swimming at the day she disappeared?

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gYTGVBb9TPI&feature=fvw



Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3 7/28/09 -
Post by: no rose colored glasses on August 06, 2009, 12:53:20 PM
Good morning Monkeys

In this video at the 51 second mark is a house,kinda light blue'ish/white'ish.The front yard(or backyard)looks filled with junk.Does anyone think this house is the same as the pool house that Lindsey went swimming at the day she disappeared?

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gYTGVBb9TPI&feature=fvw


I think it is, I remember when I saw the pictures of the house and pool, I thought it looked like a junkyard.


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3 7/28/09 -
Post by: JessStar on August 06, 2009, 01:09:42 PM
I've been thinking about this case over the last few days. Here are my thoughs- I throw them out there for consideration. Perhaps LE knows the who, when and where, but does not know the "what." They won't know the "what" until Lindsey is found.  Without knowing the "what," they can't make a solid arrest because there's no evidence that a crime has been committed "by the who." In fact, the evidence trail may be so weak that, until Lindsey is found, the connection to the "who" can't be made.


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3 7/28/09 -
Post by: no rose colored glasses on August 06, 2009, 01:14:02 PM
I've been thinking about this case over the last few days. Here are my thoughs- I throw them out there for consideration. Perhaps LE knows the who, when and where, but does not know the "what." They won't know the "what" until Lindsey is found.  Without knowing the "what," they can't make a solid arrest because there's no evidence that a crime has been committed "by the who." In fact, the evidence trail may be so weak that, until Lindsey is found, the connection to the "who" can't be made.
That could very well be, thanks.


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3 7/28/09 -
Post by: canadianmonkey on August 06, 2009, 01:38:30 PM
NRCG ~ I pray that the silence from the sheriff's office & media indicate that behind the scenes work is being done.  I think of Tori Stafford's parents holding daily pressers & even though it was extremely difficult on the family, it kept Tori's case from growing cold.  Someone in or around that little town in WA knows something.  I hope their conscience eats them alive until they have to talk.

I've been thinking the same thing.  Why isn't someone holding a presser everyday?  Even if only one newspaper shows up.  At least it would keep Lindsey's name out in the public.  Victoria's Mom was dragged over the coals for her pressers everyday but noone forgot about Victoria and her name kept spreading over the internet and countries.  The article about Lindsey's Mom sitting in a lawn chair just looking down the street plays in my mind over and over.  It makes me so sad as a Mom.  Someone needs to do SOMETHING!  It's incredibly frustrating.


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3 7/28/09 -
Post by: Edward on August 06, 2009, 01:42:07 PM
I've been thinking about this case over the last few days. Here are my thoughs- I throw them out there for consideration. Perhaps LE knows the who, when and where, but does not know the "what." They won't know the "what" until Lindsey is found.  Without knowing the "what," they can't make a solid arrest because there's no evidence that a crime has been committed "by the who." In fact, the evidence trail may be so weak that, until Lindsey is found, the connection to the "who" can't be made.

Exactley..

Many, many, cases are like that.. A friend of mine who is a cold case detective for our sheriff department did solve a case that was 20 something years old last year.. they had everything you mentioned.. The Culprit actually called him and had him come to his home in Idaho, where the culprit put the cards on the table and confessed. Everything fell into place and LE knew it was him the whole time but they had no body..


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3 7/28/09 -
Post by: JessStar on August 06, 2009, 02:34:08 PM
I'd also note that in over 75% of these cases, the perp is known to law enforcement within 1 week of locating the victim. 


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3 7/28/09 -
Post by: Heidismom on August 06, 2009, 04:13:16 PM
Good morning Monkeys

In this video at the 51 second mark is a house,kinda light blue'ish/white'ish.The front yard(or backyard)looks filled with junk.Does anyone think this house is the same as the pool house that Lindsey went swimming at the day she disappeared?

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gYTGVBb9TPI&feature=fvw


I think it is, I remember when I saw the pictures of the house and pool, I thought it looked like a junkyard.

I think it is a house on Maple, across the street from KK  and maybe East one house.


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3 7/28/09 -
Post by: no rose colored glasses on August 06, 2009, 04:18:40 PM
Good morning Monkeys

In this video at the 51 second mark is a house,kinda light blue'ish/white'ish.The front yard(or backyard)looks filled with junk.Does anyone think this house is the same as the pool house that Lindsey went swimming at the day she disappeared?

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gYTGVBb9TPI&feature=fvw


I think it is, I remember when I saw the pictures of the house and pool, I thought it looked like a junkyard.

I think it is a house on Maple, across the street from KK  and maybe East one house.
Thanks


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3 7/28/09 -
Post by: no rose colored glasses on August 06, 2009, 04:57:50 PM
Hi Everyone,  We all know it is the little things in a case that can make a huge difference in the solving of it.  And we need to discover what in the world happened to Lindsey so she can be brought home where she belongs.

I have a thought based on something I read here and want to PM someone.  I have never needed to do this here and don't see a PM opportunity listed.

It would be directed to a poster who is very familiar with all the posts written by those in the know here.  I see some gray areas in what a poster has written and think it might be valuable in learning about the true circumstances that night when Lindsey fell off the face of the earth. 

xox 
I may be wrong, but if you are the same Scandi as the Scandi on WS, I'm finding it all very interesting, thanks. If you are not, I apologize.


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3 7/28/09 -
Post by: KarmaRoundUp on August 06, 2009, 05:00:31 PM
Good morning Monkeys

In this video at the 51 second mark is a house,kinda light blue'ish/white'ish.The front yard(or backyard)looks filled with junk.Does anyone think this house is the same as the pool house that Lindsey went swimming at the day she disappeared?

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gYTGVBb9TPI&feature=fvw


I think it is, I remember when I saw the pictures of the house and pool, I thought it looked like a junkyard.
EEeekkk,something happened to my post,grrrrr

I thought the 2 houses looked the same but in the pool house pics the house doesn't look blue?Or blue'ish with dark blue trim.
The pool house is on 3rd street aka main street.


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3 7/28/09 -
Post by: KarmaRoundUp on August 06, 2009, 05:01:50 PM
Good morning Monkeys

In this video at the 51 second mark is a house,kinda light blue'ish/white'ish.The front yard(or backyard)looks filled with junk.Does anyone think this house is the same as the pool house that Lindsey went swimming at the day she disappeared?

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gYTGVBb9TPI&feature=fvw


I think it is, I remember when I saw the pictures of the house and pool, I thought it looked like a junkyard.

I think it is a house on Maple, across the street from KK  and maybe East one house.
Hi HeidisMom
The house in the video is on Maple right?


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3 7/28/09 -
Post by: KarmaRoundUp on August 06, 2009, 05:05:45 PM
Let me try this again.
House with pool where Lindsey and friends played the day Lindsey went missing.This house is on 3rd street aka main street.



Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3 7/28/09 -
Post by: KarmaRoundUp on August 06, 2009, 05:07:58 PM
I wonder who lives in the pool house on 3rd street?


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3 7/28/09 -
Post by: no rose colored glasses on August 06, 2009, 05:10:05 PM
I wonder who lives in the pool house on 3rd street?
I wonder also, and the pool house appears to have somekind of shingles.


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3 7/28/09 -
Post by: KarmaRoundUp on August 06, 2009, 05:12:35 PM
I wonder who lives in the pool house on 3rd street?
I wonder also, and the pool house appears to have somekind of shingles.
Yes,now they look like 2 different houses to me.HeidisMom said the video house in on Maple I believe.


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3 7/28/09 -
Post by: Heidismom on August 06, 2009, 05:27:20 PM
Good morning Monkeys

In this video at the 51 second mark is a house,kinda light blue'ish/white'ish.The front yard(or backyard)looks filled with junk.Does anyone think this house is the same as the pool house that Lindsey went swimming at the day she disappeared?

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gYTGVBb9TPI&feature=fvw


I think it is, I remember when I saw the pictures of the house and pool, I thought it looked like a junkyard.

I think it is a house on Maple, across the street from KK  and maybe East one house.
Hi HeidisMom
The house in the video is on Maple right?


The house in the video is on the corner of Maple & 5th.  The white with blue trim side faces 5th, & the side that faces Maple is kind of gray old asbestos looking shingles.  And Yes, that is a skull in the pile of stuff, it is some kind of decoration or making a statement?  I don't know the people, they are older people.


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3 7/28/09 -
Post by: no rose colored glasses on August 06, 2009, 05:31:02 PM
Thanks, I don't see any skull, but I see an owl statue.


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3 7/28/09 -
Post by: KarmaRoundUp on August 06, 2009, 05:38:51 PM
Good morning Monkeys

In this video at the 51 second mark is a house,kinda light blue'ish/white'ish.The front yard(or backyard)looks filled with junk.Does anyone think this house is the same as the pool house that Lindsey went swimming at the day she disappeared?

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gYTGVBb9TPI&feature=fvw


I think it is, I remember when I saw the pictures of the house and pool, I thought it looked like a junkyard.

I think it is a house on Maple, across the street from KK  and maybe East one house.
Hi HeidisMom
The house in the video is on Maple right?


The house in the video is on the corner of Maple & 5th.  The white with blue trim side faces 5th, & the side that faces Maple is kind of gray old asbestos looking shingles.  And Yes, that is a skull in the pile of stuff, it is some kind of decoration or making a statement?  I don't know the people, they are older people.
Yikes,I didn't see the skull or the owl statue.Thanks for the info HeidisMom.So Lindsey would have/could have walked right by this house.    ::MonkeyEek::


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3 7/28/09 -
Post by: KarmaRoundUp on August 06, 2009, 05:45:11 PM
Let me try this again.
House with pool where Lindsey and friends played the day Lindsey went missing.This house is on 3rd street aka main street.


HeidisMom,you don't have to answer,I'll fully understand.
Do you know the people that live in this pool house?


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3 7/28/09 -
Post by: Heidismom on August 06, 2009, 05:50:10 PM
Good morning Monkeys

In this video at the 51 second mark is a house,kinda light blue'ish/white'ish.The front yard(or backyard)looks filled with junk.Does anyone think this house is the same as the pool house that Lindsey went swimming at the day she disappeared?

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gYTGVBb9TPI&feature=fvw


I think it is, I remember when I saw the pictures of the house and pool, I thought it looked like a junkyard.

I think it is a house on Maple, across the street from KK  and maybe East one house.
Hi HeidisMom
The house in the video is on Maple right?


The house in the video is on the corner of Maple & 5th.  The white with blue trim side faces 5th, & the side that faces Maple is kind of gray old asbestos looking shingles.  And Yes, that is a skull in the pile of stuff, it is some kind of decoration or making a statement?  I don't know the people, they are older people.
Yikes,I didn't see the skull or the owl statue.Thanks for the info HeidisMom.So Lindsey would have/could have walked right by this house.    ::MonkeyEek::


Yes, she would have walked right by it if she headed directly home.  The skull is in the red tripod, you will have to back the video up, then you can see just a little white next to a fiber plant pot that is hanging on the trpod.  The white is a skull.  Could be left over Halloween decor, I think that is when I first noticed it.
Change of subject, just saw a McCleary police officer knocking on a door on 3rd.  He had an official looking paper in his hand.  He was by himself, so couldn't have been too serious.  Always makes one wonder, now, tho.


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3 7/28/09 -
Post by: KarmaRoundUp on August 06, 2009, 06:04:43 PM
Good morning Monkeys

In this video at the 51 second mark is a house,kinda light blue'ish/white'ish.The front yard(or backyard)looks filled with junk.Does anyone think this house is the same as the pool house that Lindsey went swimming at the day she disappeared?

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gYTGVBb9TPI&feature=fvw


I think it is, I remember when I saw the pictures of the house and pool, I thought it looked like a junkyard.

I think it is a house on Maple, across the street from KK  and maybe East one house.
Hi HeidisMom
The house in the video is on Maple right?


The house in the video is on the corner of Maple & 5th.  The white with blue trim side faces 5th, & the side that faces Maple is kind of gray old asbestos looking shingles.  And Yes, that is a skull in the pile of stuff, it is some kind of decoration or making a statement?  I don't know the people, they are older people.
Yikes,I didn't see the skull or the owl statue.Thanks for the info HeidisMom.So Lindsey would have/could have walked right by this house.    ::MonkeyEek::


Yes, she would have walked right by it if she headed directly home.  The skull is in the red tripod, you will have to back the video up, then you can see just a little white next to a fiber plant pot that is hanging on the trpod.  The white is a skull.  Could be left over Halloween decor, I think that is when I first noticed it.
Change of subject, just saw a McCleary police officer knocking on a door on 3rd.  He had an official looking paper in his hand.  He was by himself, so couldn't have been too serious.  Always makes one wonder, now, tho.
Looks kinda like a shrine of junk in that yard lol
Do you happen to know if KaraK is getting the search center set up yet?


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3 7/28/09 -
Post by: KarmaRoundUp on August 06, 2009, 06:08:56 PM
HeidisMom wrote:


Quote
Yes, she would have walked right by it if she headed directly home.  The skull is in the red tripod, you will have to back the video up, then you can see just a little white next to a fiber plant pot that is hanging on the trpod.  The white is a skull.  Could be left over Halloween decor, I think that is when I first noticed it.
Change of subject, just saw a McCleary police officer knocking on a door on 3rd.  He had an official looking paper in his hand.  He was by himself, so couldn't have been too serious.  Always makes one wonder, now, tho.
I had to snip that long quote stack.
I wanted to tell you also how bad I feel for the people in that small town.
It has to be scary(especially those with kids)to wonder what happened to Lindsey,where can she be?Is she dead or alive?I feel the worse for her Mama Melissa.


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3 7/28/09 -
Post by: Heidismom on August 06, 2009, 06:19:03 PM
HeidisMom wrote:


Quote
Yes, she would have walked right by it if she headed directly home.  The skull is in the red tripod, you will have to back the video up, then you can see just a little white next to a fiber plant pot that is hanging on the trpod.  The white is a skull.  Could be left over Halloween decor, I think that is when I first noticed it.
Change of subject, just saw a McCleary police officer knocking on a door on 3rd.  He had an official looking paper in his hand.  He was by himself, so couldn't have been too serious.  Always makes one wonder, now, tho.
I had to snip that long quote stack.
I wanted to tell you also how bad I feel for the people in that small town.
It has to be scary(especially those with kids)to wonder what happened to Lindsey,where can she be?Is she dead or alive?I feel the worse for her Mama Melissa.

I don't know about the search center.  I will be watching for it.
Yes, I hate the feeling I have when I see something that makes me question someone in my mind.  I'm trying not to get paranoid about it.  I have to remind my self, it is only one person, & at the most two, not everyone that looks a little questionable.


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3 7/28/09 -
Post by: KarmaRoundUp on August 06, 2009, 07:23:04 PM
HeidisMom wrote:


Quote
Yes, she would have walked right by it if she headed directly home.  The skull is in the red tripod, you will have to back the video up, then you can see just a little white next to a fiber plant pot that is hanging on the trpod.  The white is a skull.  Could be left over Halloween decor, I think that is when I first noticed it.
Change of subject, just saw a McCleary police officer knocking on a door on 3rd.  He had an official looking paper in his hand.  He was by himself, so couldn't have been too serious.  Always makes one wonder, now, tho.
I had to snip that long quote stack.
I wanted to tell you also how bad I feel for the people in that small town.
It has to be scary(especially those with kids)to wonder what happened to Lindsey,where can she be?Is she dead or alive?I feel the worse for her Mama Melissa.

I don't know about the search center.  I will be watching for it.
Yes, I hate the feeling I have when I see something that makes me question someone in my mind.  I'm trying not to get paranoid about it.  I have to remind my self, it is only one person, & at the most two, not everyone that looks a little questionable.
I hear you,it would be really hard to not get paranoid in that situation.


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3 7/28/09 -
Post by: AZSunny on August 06, 2009, 08:44:46 PM
Heidi, I thought the blue and white pool house was where the girls swam all day.  Did you say an older couple lived there?  I assumed it was someone with children Lindsey's age. 


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3 7/28/09 -
Post by: Heidismom on August 06, 2009, 08:57:23 PM
Heidi, I thought the blue and white pool house was where the girls swam all day.  Did you say an older couple lived there?  I assumed it was someone with children Lindsey's age. 


I would have to look at the pics again to see exactly what color the pool house is.  I think part of it is gray, & maybe part is unpainted.  It is on Main st.  The house someone saw on youtube & asked about today, is on 5th & Maple, it is gray, with one section whitish with blue trim.  It is the one with the older people, I don't know who lives in the pool house.  Pictures of both houses were on this thread today.


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3 7/28/09 -
Post by: AZSunny on August 06, 2009, 10:10:44 PM
Heidi, I thought the blue and white pool house was where the girls swam all day.  Did you say an older couple lived there?  I assumed it was someone with children Lindsey's age. 


I would have to look at the pics again to see exactly what color the pool house is.  I think part of it is gray, & maybe part is unpainted.  It is on Main st.  The house someone saw on youtube & asked about today, is on 5th & Maple, it is gray, with one section whitish with blue trim.  It is the one with the older people, I don't know who lives in the pool house.  Pictures of both houses were on this thread today.

OK,  sorry I was confused.  I know the pool house had a lot of junk out in front, and the house on the video did too.  I thought they were the same house. 


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3 7/28/09 -
Post by: KarmaRoundUp on August 07, 2009, 08:22:02 AM
Good morning Monkeys
I'm bringing these images over from Mike at WS.
Mike took these pictures from the air of McCleary.They are the best images I have seen so far and I'm trying to check them out to see where the streets are and other locations.I did find the Shell gas station.If any locals can help point out other landmarks or streets that would be great!


Originally Posted by mikeb 
I have been following Lindsey's story from the beginning and have read some of the posts in this forum(there's a lot). I had a theory about what happened but it wasn't really based on anything solid. I live about an hours drive away and have been wanting to help somehow. Last Tuesday I flew over McCleary and shot some photos I hope you will find useful. There are some of McCleary and of the road between McCleary and Porter. My original theory posited that since it was a Friday night someone was on their way to the Indian casino and their route would take them through McCleary.

Anyway the picture are posted at
http://www.vp-photo.com/mccleary.htm

 http://www.vp-photo.com/mccleary.htm

 If you click on the thumbnail it will open a larger version in another window.

Mike

http://websleuths.com/forums/showthread.php?t=87157&page=18

http://www.vp-photo.com/mccleary.htm




Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3 7/28/09 -
Post by: Leroy on August 07, 2009, 09:10:33 AM
Thanks for bringing those pictures over Karma.  And Good Morning!


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3 7/28/09 -
Post by: no rose colored glasses on August 07, 2009, 09:45:34 AM
Thanks for bringing those pictures over Karma.  And Good Morning!
Good Morning, thanks, great pictures  ::MonkeyCool::


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3 7/28/09 -
Post by: KarmaRoundUp on August 07, 2009, 10:16:06 AM
You're very welcome Leroy and NoRose
Have a great day,I'll be back later when I have more time to really look at these images.If anyone posts on DD's site,can you make sure she see's these images?Also,can you post on DD's site by not registering,by being a guest?I have some things DD may be interested in.


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3 7/28/09 -
Post by: A_News_Junkie_Monkey on August 07, 2009, 10:18:02 AM
You're very welcome Leroy and NoRose
Have a great day,I'll be back later when I have more time to really look at these images.If anyone posts on DD's site,can you make sure she see's these images?Also,can you post on DD's site by not registering,by being a guest?I have some things DD may be interested in.


Karma,
Not sure about posting as guest - but I will tell her.  I think she still reads here, but I am not positive.  My email is in profile so if you want me to send her anything - just email me. 


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3 7/28/09 -
Post by: A_News_Junkie_Monkey on August 07, 2009, 10:28:36 AM
Karma - sent her the link. 

Sure hope we get some news on Lindsay case soon.  I am so sick of hearing about MJ - Lindsay is so much more important. 


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3 7/28/09 -
Post by: sunshine12 on August 07, 2009, 12:04:08 PM
dd- we miss you in here

the lack of press releases in this case is very frustrating.  i just wish we had more information to go on.  i believe lindsey is close by and the person that did this is still roaming around the community.  she said she was scared on her myspace page and had that feeling that something bad was gonna happen to her.  i think there was someone in town that really freaked her out and that was following her. maybe this person even planned the whole thing out and was waiting for the perfect opportunity to snatch her.  looking at the terrain from the pictures recently posted, i can see that it could be difficult for her to be found.  i think whoever took her unfortunately killed her and dug a hole in the woods within 10 miles of mccleary. i hope and pray that i am wrong, but this is my gut feeling.


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3 7/28/09 -
Post by: Lovinlife on August 07, 2009, 12:25:32 PM
I agree on all points Sunshine12, especially that we miss DoubleDecker!

Those aerial photos were excellent.  Gives you a real sense of the diverse landscape outlying McCleary that needs to be searched, IMO. 



Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3 7/28/09 -
Post by: Lovinlife on August 07, 2009, 01:25:13 PM
One other thing I noticed from the photos, JMO of course, is that McCleary is a town not of great wealth.  It sure would be nice if they could get the reward money up to $25K+.  People might start talkin'.


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3 7/28/09 -
Post by: JessStar on August 07, 2009, 02:02:02 PM
What's the reward at now?


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3 7/28/09 -
Post by: Lovinlife on August 07, 2009, 02:08:58 PM
What's the reward at now?
I believe it is $10,000. I could be wrong, I thought it was still at $6000.00 when I posted that.  ^^^^^^


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3 7/28/09 -
Post by: pink angel on August 07, 2009, 03:24:02 PM
dd- we miss you in here

the lack of press releases in this case is very frustrating.  i just wish we had more information to go on.  i believe lindsey is close by and the person that did this is still roaming around the community.  she said she was scared on her myspace page and had that feeling that something bad was gonna happen to her.  i think there was someone in town that really freaked her out and that was following her. maybe this person even planned the whole thing out and was waiting for the perfect opportunity to snatch her.  looking at the terrain from the pictures recently posted, i can see that it could be difficult for her to be found.  i think whoever took her unfortunately killed her and dug a hole in the woods within 10 miles of mccleary. i hope and pray that i am wrong, but this is my gut feeling.

Sadly, after time most missing people cases media coverage slows down or stops completely and will only pick it back up if there is a break in the case. They need a "story" to cover.
Lindsey's family and friends have to be proactive to keep her name in the media. Lindsey's family/friends have to hold vigils, hold fundraising events, agree to do interviews, they have to become Lindsey's advocate to keep her name and picture in the news, they need to create that "story" that the newspapers and TV stations will want to cover.
Here are some ideas in case KaraK is reading here still.

    *  Organize students who will distribute posters and flyers.
    * Appearances on radio or television talk shows by parents (radio can be done in-studio by telephone, live or taped.)
    * Radio stations all across the state can be asked to play your child’s favorite song or a song selected by parents, e.g., “Somewhere Out There” from “An American Tale” and have the song dedicated to the child.
    * Hold a rally at the child’s school with music and prayers.
    * Organize a benefit dance and/or auction.
    * Contact area sports teams to include photos and story in their programs and possibly have a P.A. announcement made at games.
    * Produce buttons or T-shirts with your child’s name.
    * Dedication of a garden or a tree to the child.
    * Hold a candlelight vigil indoors or outdoors.
    * Bowling tournaments, marathons, etc. dedicated to your child.
    * Contact banks or local businesses to dedicate a Christmas tree/lights to the child.
    * Contact radio stations offering to do a telephone interview to remind people to keep watching and looking for the child.
    * Have classmates do a letter writing campaign, writing to friends and families across the country telling about the missing child.
    * Organize a human chain linking communities school to school, house to church, etc. Radio stations can help organize the crowd. Ask sports celebrities to participate.
    * Public Service Announcements and appeals for help on radio and television.
    * Mass release of helium filled balloons imprinted with child’s name, or with information about the missing child inside.


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3 7/28/09 -
Post by: pink angel on August 07, 2009, 03:26:38 PM
http://scaredmonkeys.net/index.php?topic=5851.0

klaas has posted a list of media contacts here.


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3 7/28/09 -
Post by: Rob on August 07, 2009, 03:48:26 PM
I've been thinking of Lindsey and how sad the whole thing really is. I haven't forgotten her. I have thought of all the things that everyone here has also considered. I agree that all scenarios have been explored. I don't think anything or any one thing has been over looked here. Everyone has pretty much had their thoughts posted and explanations examined.

And of course people don't just vanish or dematerialize. It doesn't happen. I think it's safe to rule out a bigfoot abduction as there has only been one person that ever claimed he was abducted by a bigfoot. That a funny story unto itself and better suited for the musing thread I suppose.

In thinking of what could have happened to Lindsey, I am quite sure this is an abduction. In fact, I am 110% sure. But what type of abduction? Someone from the net? I don't think so and her computer records have been carefully examined - after all it's been more than a month and adequate time to examine all technical forensic data. I think this is not the avenue LE is searching. And as I posted the other day - I think the LE is telling the truth - they don't know what happened. Sorry to say - they are stymied. What could the LE gain by playing a game with information? none that I can see and a little girl is missing. Games are better used on terrorists to gain info, not round up a phantom church cult when a little girl needs to be found.

I believe this is a stranger abduction and a crime of opportunity. Maybe I'm wrong, and unlike other posters - I don't think she is nearby at all. I sure hope I'm wrong. This type of abduction would be the most difficult to solve and I think this has many of the hallmarks.

In thinking about what happened - MAYBE NO ONE SAW ANYTHING. I know I know - how could that happen? We have one person saying she saw her walking to a point and that was it. Dogs pick her scent up to an area and that was that. A creek area was search 6 times and nothing. I don't think anyone saw anything and as hard as that is to believe - I think that's what happened. Stranger things have happened and children have even been abducted out of their own rooms while the parents have been in the same house on the same floor. It happens. And sometimes no one sees anything.

I guess it's always easier for us as internet posters to say - someone knows something and is holding that info. Maybe that's not the case here and no one knows anything. I know that an extremely bitter pill to swallow, but how do you explain what happened here over the last 6 weeks? I have no explanation other than  - no one saw anything.

Maybe this white mystery van with the Washington plates was used. A van would block three lines of sight. And if someone used a van - there is a good chance that there is an accomplice that does the snatching and grabbing with the side doors as the other person drives. This eliminates the need to really stop and draw attention. There is a reason those vans are called serial killer vans. And abduction like this could take seconds. That's all it would take - 5 seconds and gone.

Anyway - I have not forgotten about Lindsey and wonder where she is and hope there is a big break in the case soon. I hope her family receieves the strength they need to make it through the days ahead as the wait for her to return...

Prayers for Lindsey.   


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3 7/28/09 -
Post by: JessStar on August 07, 2009, 04:08:24 PM
You know, Rob, I was originally of the thought that Lindsey was abducted by someone she knew or that she was familiar with.  This originally had all the hallmarks of an "acquaintance" abduction.  But as more and more time passes without Lindsey being found, I am beginning to sway from that belief.  It is becoming more and more likely that this was a stranger abduction, and a crime of opportunity.  So I'm saddened to say, I think you are right.  And if that's the case, it will be a long time before Lindsey is found, and even a longer time that this case is solved.   ::MonkeyWaa::


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3 7/28/09 -
Post by: sunshine12 on August 07, 2009, 04:24:57 PM
You know, Rob, I was originally of the thought that Lindsey was abducted by someone she knew or that she was familiar with.  This originally had all the hallmarks of an "acquaintance" abduction.  But as more and more time passes without Lindsey being found, I am beginning to sway from that belief.  It is becoming more and more likely that this was a stranger abduction, and a crime of opportunity.  So I'm saddened to say, I think you are right.  And if that's the case, it will be a long time before Lindsey is found, and even a longer time that this case is solved.   ::MonkeyWaa::

jessStar-i couldn't agree more. i have admired all of your hardwork in the nevaeh forum as well.

i think rob hit the nail on the head with his post.


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3 7/28/09 -
Post by: JessStar on August 07, 2009, 04:37:30 PM
You know, Rob, I was originally of the thought that Lindsey was abducted by someone she knew or that she was familiar with.  This originally had all the hallmarks of an "acquaintance" abduction.  But as more and more time passes without Lindsey being found, I am beginning to sway from that belief.  It is becoming more and more likely that this was a stranger abduction, and a crime of opportunity.  So I'm saddened to say, I think you are right.  And if that's the case, it will be a long time before Lindsey is found, and even a longer time that this case is solved.   ::MonkeyWaa::

jessStar-i couldn't agree more. i have admired all of your hardwork in the nevaeh forum as well.

i think rob hit the nail on the head with his post.

Thank you Sunshine.  The truth is, I wish there was more I could do.  I go to sleep at night thinking about these kids and they pop into my head the moment I wake up.  This is especially true with Neveah because of her tender years and the circumstances surrounding how she likely died.  It eats me inside.  And it eats me inside knowing that someone out there has all the answers but no conscience.  Yes, I have my own inventory of cases that I handle as part of my "real" job, and you'd think that after 15 years, I'd be somewhat sensitized to this.  But I'm not.  And nothing I have or had (thankfully) remotely compares to Nevaeh's case. I'm afraid that my heart has been forever broken, and that my mind will not be at rest until the devil him/herself is arrested, charged and convicted.

God Bless all these little children that have been dealt the worst hand of cards imagineable in a game they never chose to play.






Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3 7/28/09 -
Post by: JessStar on August 07, 2009, 08:32:35 PM
A question for the locals: how well publicized is the reward?  Would fliers help?


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3 7/28/09 -
Post by: KarmaRoundUp on August 07, 2009, 08:56:21 PM
You're very welcome Leroy and NoRose
Have a great day,I'll be back later when I have more time to really look at these images.If anyone posts on DD's site,can you make sure she see's these images?Also,can you post on DD's site by not registering,by being a guest?I have some things DD may be interested in.


Karma,
Not sure about posting as guest - but I will tell her.  I think she still reads here, but I am not positive.  My email is in profile so if you want me to send her anything - just email me. 
Okey dokey NewsJunkie
I'll email you tomorrow,thank you.


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3 7/28/09 -
Post by: A_News_Junkie_Monkey on August 07, 2009, 09:51:31 PM
A question for the locals: how well publicized is the reward?  Would fliers help?

JessStar - don't you just wish we could hop on a plane, go look - set up a center and get someone local as motivated as monkeys are?  It breaks my heart, but it seems as if nobody local is willing to give up their time to spearhead this.  If I were only closer.   ::MonkeyWaa::


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3 7/28/09 -
Post by: doubledecker on August 07, 2009, 11:24:20 PM
A question for the locals: how well publicized is the reward?  Would fliers help?

I have a phone number those calls were made from for the report, I have the time PERIOD but no actual date.  I can't post the phone number on here.


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3 7/28/09 -
Post by: doubledecker on August 07, 2009, 11:26:08 PM
supposedly 3-4 calls were made and one to cps and said she does not know if a report was made or not


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3 7/28/09 -
Post by: JessStar on August 08, 2009, 04:40:11 AM
Yes, ANJ, I wish I could. I need someone to answer my fliers question!


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3 7/28/09 -
Post by: no rose colored glasses on August 08, 2009, 10:06:21 AM
supposedly 3-4 calls were made and one to cps and said she does not know if a report was made or not
::MonkeyConfused::  cps, child protective services? What kind of report?


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3 7/28/09 -
Post by: Tamikosmom on August 08, 2009, 10:23:57 AM
supposedly 3-4 calls were made and one to cps and said she does not know if a report was made or not
::MonkeyConfused::  cps, child protective services? What kind of report?

It would appear that there is some credibility to mlachester's words ... words that imply that Josh Baum should be considered a person of interest in the process of elimination in the investigation into the disappearance of his sister.

Janet

+++++++

mlachester 1 day ago wrote:

To answer the questions everyone has asked, Yes I have talked to police and as far as things being unfounded its more of lazy work by cps and I don't know what the police were thinking. Since Lindsey has gone missing I have helped serch and put fliers up. I was called by the agents investigating and told them what I know. And this is no nick name everyone in McCleary knows who I am. Its no big secret she had came to my house to call 911 when her brother had done things to her. I hope lindsey is hiding and she finds a way to get to someone for help to tell them why. But as everyday gose by the fear gets worse.

http://www.king5.com/topstories/stories/NW_063009WAB-Mccleary-girl-search-LJ.1fc0b759.html?ocp=2#slcgm_comments_anchor


mlachester 2 hours ago wrote:

I am close to her and I know a lot more than the media or law enforcement are saying right now. … Sorry if you don't like the truth but I have never been one to keep the truth in and she should of been taken the first time she called 911 from my house asking for help instead of put in a police car and taken back to her abuser!"

http://www.king5.com/topstories/stor...omments_anchor






Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3
Post by: Tamikosmom on August 08, 2009, 10:25:06 AM
I am going to go out on a limb here.  I will say this then I don't have time for the josh baum theory. 

I have asked for the info jessstar needs to look up the public record for josh.  Someone was going to ask for that info yesterday.  that would settle all of this.  I have not heard back from that person yet, but as soon as I do I will know whether or not that person is willing to give us the info so jessstar can look for that record.  I explained that this would end all this back and forth yes there was a 911 report and no there was not.  At this point I am not choosing sides as to who to believe, although I feel if a person can settle this they should so we can get on to whatever it is we are doing.

if this person can prove this report exists, then we will know.  If they choose not to help prove this, then why should I believe anything they say?  we have a couple of people who obviously had some kind of disagreement along the line somewhere and one says this and the other says that.  I can't say oh I believe one because they say so.  if one of them can PROVE they are the one telling the truth and that the other is lying, they the one who has the means to PROVE it should.  So if they choose not to do so, I am not believing them. 

if they are so outspoken with the truth, then they should give up that info.  If not, then I guess they are really that concerned about the truth, rather all they want to do is bash lindsey's family.  that is my personal opinion.

actually to tell you the truth I need off of here for a bit because I am getting aggrivated at this whole josh baum thing. 

if anyone needs me, you can find me at my profile. 



BUMPED


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3 7/28/09 -
Post by: A_News_Junkie_Monkey on August 08, 2009, 10:36:06 AM
supposedly 3-4 calls were made and one to cps and said she does not know if a report was made or not
::MonkeyConfused::  cps, child protective services? What kind of report?

It would appear that there is some credibility to mlachester's words ... words that imply that Josh Baum should be considered a person of interest in the process of elimination in the investigation into the disappearance of his sister.

Janet

+++++++

mlachester 1 day ago wrote:

To answer the questions everyone has asked, Yes I have talked to police and as far as things being unfounded its more of lazy work by cps and I don't know what the police were thinking. Since Lindsey has gone missing I have helped serch and put fliers up. I was called by the agents investigating and told them what I know. And this is no nick name everyone in McCleary knows who I am. Its no big secret she had came to my house to call 911 when her brother had done things to her. I hope lindsey is hiding and she finds a way to get to someone for help to tell them why. But as everyday gose by the fear gets worse.

http://www.king5.com/topstories/stories/NW_063009WAB-Mccleary-girl-search-LJ.1fc0b759.html?ocp=2#slcgm_comments_anchor


mlachester 2 hours ago wrote:

I am close to her and I know a lot more than the media or law enforcement are saying right now. … Sorry if you don't like the truth but I have never been one to keep the truth in and she should of been taken the first time she called 911 from my house asking for help instead of put in a police car and taken back to her abuser!"

http://www.king5.com/topstories/stor...omments_anchor






Janet - the first quote is from a month ago.
The second link is now broken, fyi.


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3 7/28/09 -
Post by: Tamikosmom on August 08, 2009, 10:44:27 AM
DD ... I respectfully disagree.

It is my understanding that PROOF in the form of records when it involves a minor within CPS ... within any branch of the system ... is not forthcoming.

I am not saying that mlachester is the bearer of the truth.  However ... when it is considered that she indentifies herself in her comments and she involves CPS, 911 and the small police force of McCleary in the alleged incident that involves Lindsey ... I will not disregard her words.

Janet

 



Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3 7/28/09 -
Post by: no rose colored glasses on August 08, 2009, 10:49:55 AM
Okay, now I am caught up with the cps remark, I forgot about that, so are there records of this happening?


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3 7/28/09 -
Post by: Tamikosmom on August 08, 2009, 10:51:15 AM

Janet - the first quote is from a month ago.
The second link is now broken, fyi.

Quotes from a month ago are not regarded?

 ::MonkeyConfused::

Janet



Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3 7/28/09 -
Post by: no rose colored glasses on August 08, 2009, 11:00:00 AM
If there are reports of somekind with cps or LE I think that is important.  ::MonkeyEek::  On the other hand it might have nothing what so ever to do with Lindsey's disappearance, just that it is very interesting.


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3 7/28/09 -
Post by: A_News_Junkie_Monkey on August 08, 2009, 11:00:30 AM

Janet - the first quote is from a month ago.
The second link is now broken, fyi.

Quotes from a month ago are not regarded?

 ::MonkeyConfused::

Janet

LOL - no just saying it says: mlachester 1 day ago wrote:   and it was actually a month ago.  At first, I was like is she talking again - wait - she already said this.  So since the second link was broken I thought I would point that out too.




Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3 7/28/09 -
Post by: Tamikosmom on August 08, 2009, 11:00:37 AM
I have a phone number those calls were made from for the report, I have the time PERIOD but no actual date.  I can't post the phone number on here.

 ::MonkeyShocked::


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3 7/28/09 -
Post by: Tamikosmom on August 08, 2009, 11:03:33 AM

Janet - the first quote is from a month ago.
The second link is now broken, fyi.

Quotes from a month ago are not regarded?

 ::MonkeyConfused::

Janet

LOL - no just saying it says: mlachester 1 day ago wrote:   and it was actually a month ago.  At first, I was like is she talking again - wait - she already said this.  So since the second link was broken I thought I would point that out too.



 ::MonkeyHaHa::

Thanks.  I can understand the confusion.

Janet


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3 7/28/09 -
Post by: no rose colored glasses on August 08, 2009, 11:04:10 AM
I have a phone number those calls were made from for the report, I have the time PERIOD but no actual date.  I can't post the phone number on here.

 ::MonkeyShocked::
WOW that is interesting.


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3 7/28/09 -
Post by: Tamikosmom on August 08, 2009, 11:07:30 AM
supposedly 3-4 calls were made and one to cps and said she does not know if a report was made or not

BUMPED


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3 7/28/09 -
Post by: Tamikosmom on August 08, 2009, 11:15:45 AM
Thanks for the info DD.

Janet


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3 7/28/09 -
Post by: JessStar on August 08, 2009, 11:26:29 AM
I have a phone number those calls were made from for the report, I have the time PERIOD but no actual date.  I can't post the phone number on here.

 ::MonkeyShocked::
WOW that is interesting.

As soon as DD emails me this information, I will be following up and will request the records.  I probably cannot get the CPS records (assuming they even exist), but I should be able to get the 911 records.


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3 7/28/09 -
Post by: doubledecker on August 08, 2009, 11:44:27 AM
let me add to this info, as I believe people take all of this however they choose to further what they think, when actually, I have heard a LOT LOT more having to do with this but because it has NOTHING at all to do with Josh Baum and might be something that would sway people into thinking things they should not (because I can't post ALL of what this is about), then I think I should at least say what I personally think about all of this. 

I believe there is some on-going feud(if you will) between ML(marilyn Lachester) and MB(Melissa Baum).  supposedly marilyn has called the police on Melissa Baum 3-4 times and has called cps on her once.  This happened in the summer of 2008 as far as I am told.  Mind you I had someone who knows marilyn ask her specific questions and these are the answers I am getting(I intend to talk with Marilyn herself, to be certain this is actually what she said, however, I already believe the person who asked for me, but just to be able to say it is from the horses mouth, I intend to veryify all of this through Marilyn).... in the meantime I am sharing what I can from the person who asked her for me. 

I asked for the phone number the 911 call was called from and the date, so jessstar could try to find the report.  what I was told as an answer to these questions was:

911 was called in the summer of 2008.  Marilyn called 3-4 times to the police.  She called cps once on Melissa Baum.  This had nothing to do with Josh Baum.  Marilyn says she does not know if a report was made or not.  She called them and she does not know what they did concerning making a report, but she "assumes" there is an incident report because she called them.  So there very well might not be a report at all. 

Evidently, nothing happened about all of these calls because lindsey was still living at home with her mother.  So whatever it was which marilyn called about did not seem important enough to the police to do anything about it. 

Now I do know a couple of things marilyn called about, but I am not going to post that, she can post it somewhere if she chooses to do so, which it seems as though she has no qualms about posting about Melissa or Josh.

If marilyn is telling the truth about what she felt was wrong enough that she needed to call the police and cps, then the question is, was it really happening?  Well, evidently the police did not think it anything that warranted lindsey being taken out of the home or for her mother to be
 in trouble etc;  so here is what you have to decided to believe.  Was there really anything that bad going on.  Did the police do their job in looking at the accusations by marilyn?  Was marilyn just mad at MB and josh and was calling about things that were not true or blown out of proportion?  Was lindsey telling marilyn things and marilyn thought they were worse than they were? 

see we don't KNOW, all I know is what marilyn is saying and that she does not know if there is a police report and also that the police did nothing about anything.  so what does that tell us?  It tells us either the police did not do their job and neither did cps, or... there is nothing bad going on to warrant any action by the police or cps. 

I also have info from another source other than marilyn about one of these incidents where there is a report.  And it had nothing at all to do with josh baum, and it was nothing that anyone got in trouble for nor did it warrant taking lindsey out of the home etc.  And from the extent of what I have been told actually happened, it was something that probably 80% or 90% of people would have done under the circumstances, IF the circumstances are such that I have been told.  However, am I told the truth?  I believe I was, as the police did not think this was out of line to do and no actionns were taken about it. 

Now why is marilyn saying all these horrible things were going on, I don't know.  She probably believes they were.  Obviously the police do not believe they were, or both the police and cps just did not care.  who really knows. 

as for the white car incident, supposedly marilyn is saying this happened a week before lindsey disappeared, however, marilyn HEARD about it, she did not KNOW about it.  Marilyn was not even living in McCleary at this time, she still does not live in McCleary.  She does have a lot of friends there and she does HEAR things. 

Now this is something I have no idea what this is about, but love4ever has dug up a court record for ML for assault in the summer of 2008.  I have no idea what this is about, but we can see that ML also assaults people.  So who do we believe here? 

I really don't know.  I do know what the report is about, and it has absolutely NOTHING AT ALL to do with josh baum.   


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3 7/28/09 -
Post by: Tamikosmom on August 08, 2009, 11:45:20 AM
I have a phone number those calls were made from for the report, I have the time PERIOD but no actual date.  I can't post the phone number on here.

 ::MonkeyShocked::
WOW that is interesting.

As soon as DD emails me this information, I will be following up and will request the records.  I probably cannot get the CPS records (assuming they even exist), but I should be able to get the 911 records.


Thanks JessStar

Is DD in contact with mlachester?

Janet


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3 7/28/09 -
Post by: doubledecker on August 08, 2009, 11:45:53 AM
I have a phone number those calls were made from for the report, I have the time PERIOD but no actual date.  I can't post the phone number on here.

 ::MonkeyShocked::
WOW that is interesting.

As soon as DD emails me this information, I will be following up and will request the records.  I probably cannot get the CPS records (assuming they even exist), but I should be able to get the 911 records.


do I have your email already? if so I will go through my email to get it, if not can you have klaas send it to me

thanks


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3 7/28/09 -
Post by: doubledecker on August 08, 2009, 11:52:46 AM
I have a phone number those calls were made from for the report, I have the time PERIOD but no actual date.  I can't post the phone number on here.

 ::MonkeyShocked::
WOW that is interesting.

As soon as DD emails me this information, I will be following up and will request the records.  I probably cannot get the CPS records (assuming they even exist), but I should be able to get the 911 records.


Thanks JessStar

Is DD in contact with mlachester?

Janet

I am in contact with a good friend of marilyn's family and this person ask Marilyn specifically the questions I asked her to ask.  Marilyn also told her that I can talk with her(marilyn) personally and I intend on getting ahold of Marilyn herself TODAY.  This was Marilyn's suggestion as I am told through the family friend.  I did not wish to bother marilyn but because I have been invited by her to talk with her, I will.


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3 7/28/09 -
Post by: no rose colored glasses on August 08, 2009, 11:54:12 AM
I have a phone number those calls were made from for the report, I have the time PERIOD but no actual date.  I can't post the phone number on here.

 ::MonkeyShocked::
WOW that is interesting.

As soon as DD emails me this information, I will be following up and will request the records.  I probably cannot get the CPS records (assuming they even exist), but I should be able to get the 911 records.

Thank-you


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3 7/28/09 -
Post by: no rose colored glasses on August 08, 2009, 11:58:21 AM
Thank-you very much DD.  ::MonkeyCool::


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3 7/28/09 -
Post by: Tamikosmom on August 08, 2009, 12:13:40 PM
let me add to this info, as I believe people take all of this however they choose to further what they think, when actually, I have heard a LOT LOT more having to do with this but because it has NOTHING at all to do with Josh Baum and might be something that would sway people into thinking things they should not (because I can't post ALL of what this is about), then I think I should at least say what I personally think about all of this. 

I believe there is some on-going feud(if you will) between ML(marilyn Lachester) and MB(Melissa Baum).  supposedly marilyn has called the police on Melissa Baum 3-4 times and has called cps on her once.  This happened in the summer of 2008 as far as I am told.  Mind you I had someone who knows marilyn ask her specific questions and these are the answers I am getting(I intend to talk with Marilyn herself, to be certain this is actually what she said, however, I already believe the person who asked for me, but just to be able to say it is from the horses mouth, I intend to veryify all of this through Marilyn).... in the meantime I am sharing what I can from the person who asked her for me. 

I asked for the phone number the 911 call was called from and the date, so jessstar could try to find the report.  what I was told as an answer to these questions was:

911 was called in the summer of 2008.  Marilyn called 3-4 times to the police.  She called cps once on Melissa Baum.  This had nothing to do with Josh Baum.  Marilyn says she does not know if a report was made or not.  She called them and she does not know what they did concerning making a report, but she "assumes" there is an incident report because she called them.  So there very well might not be a report at all. 

Evidently, nothing happened about all of these calls because lindsey was still living at home with her mother.  So whatever it was which marilyn called about did not seem important enough to the police to do anything about it. 

Now I do know a couple of things marilyn called about, but I am not going to post that, she can post it somewhere if she chooses to do so, which it seems as though she has no qualms about posting about Melissa or Josh.

If marilyn is telling the truth about what she felt was wrong enough that she needed to call the police and cps, then the question is, was it really happening?  Well, evidently the police did not think it anything that warranted lindsey being taken out of the home or for her mother to be
 in trouble etc;  so here is what you have to decided to believe.  Was there really anything that bad going on.  Did the police do their job in looking at the accusations by marilyn?  Was marilyn just mad at MB and josh and was calling about things that were not true or blown out of proportion?  Was lindsey telling marilyn things and marilyn thought they were worse than they were? 

see we don't KNOW, all I know is what marilyn is saying and that she does not know if there is a police report and also that the police did nothing about anything.  so what does that tell us?  It tells us either the police did not do their job and neither did cps, or... there is nothing bad going on to warrant any action by the police or cps. 

I also have info from another source other than marilyn about one of these incidents where there is a report.  And it had nothing at all to do with josh baum, and it was nothing that anyone got in trouble for nor did it warrant taking lindsey out of the home etc.  And from the extent of what I have been told actually happened, it was something that probably 80% or 90% of people would have done under the circumstances, IF the circumstances are such that I have been told.  However, am I told the truth?  I believe I was, as the police did not think this was out of line to do and no actionns were taken about it. 

Now why is marilyn saying all these horrible things were going on, I don't know.  She probably believes they were.  Obviously the police do not believe they were, or both the police and cps just did not care.  who really knows. 

as for the white car incident, supposedly marilyn is saying this happened a week before lindsey disappeared, however, marilyn HEARD about it, she did not KNOW about it.  Marilyn was not even living in McCleary at this time, she still does not live in McCleary.  She does have a lot of friends there and she does HEAR things. 

Now this is something I have no idea what this is about, but love4ever has dug up a court record for ML for assault in the summer of 2008.  I have no idea what this is about, but we can see that ML also assaults people.  So who do we believe here? 

I really don't know.  I do know what the report is about, and it has absolutely NOTHING AT ALL to do with josh baum.   



Thanks DD.

The info you have received reflects exactly the words of KaraK's posts at SM and mlachester comments at KOMO.  I am in the process of compiling backup to my contention.

KaraK:  The strained relationship between between mlachester and Melissa.

mlachester:  Frustration in regard to CPS and LE not taking 911 call  concerning Lindsey's allegations again Josh seriously.

Janet


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3 7/28/09 -
Post by: doubledecker on August 08, 2009, 12:30:50 PM
let me add to this info, as I believe people take all of this however they choose to further what they think, when actually, I have heard a LOT LOT more having to do with this but because it has NOTHING at all to do with Josh Baum and might be something that would sway people into thinking things they should not (because I can't post ALL of what this is about), then I think I should at least say what I personally think about all of this. 

I believe there is some on-going feud(if you will) between ML(marilyn Lachester) and MB(Melissa Baum).  supposedly marilyn has called the police on Melissa Baum 3-4 times and has called cps on her once.  This happened in the summer of 2008 as far as I am told.  Mind you I had someone who knows marilyn ask her specific questions and these are the answers I am getting(I intend to talk with Marilyn herself, to be certain this is actually what she said, however, I already believe the person who asked for me, but just to be able to say it is from the horses mouth, I intend to veryify all of this through Marilyn).... in the meantime I am sharing what I can from the person who asked her for me. 

I asked for the phone number the 911 call was called from and the date, so jessstar could try to find the report.  what I was told as an answer to these questions was:

911 was called in the summer of 2008.  Marilyn called 3-4 times to the police.  She called cps once on Melissa Baum.  This had nothing to do with Josh Baum.  Marilyn says she does not know if a report was made or not.  She called them and she does not know what they did concerning making a report, but she "assumes" there is an incident report because she called them.  So there very well might not be a report at all. 

Evidently, nothing happened about all of these calls because lindsey was still living at home with her mother.  So whatever it was which marilyn called about did not seem important enough to the police to do anything about it. 

Now I do know a couple of things marilyn called about, but I am not going to post that, she can post it somewhere if she chooses to do so, which it seems as though she has no qualms about posting about Melissa or Josh.

If marilyn is telling the truth about what she felt was wrong enough that she needed to call the police and cps, then the question is, was it really happening?  Well, evidently the police did not think it anything that warranted lindsey being taken out of the home or for her mother to be
 in trouble etc;  so here is what you have to decided to believe.  Was there really anything that bad going on.  Did the police do their job in looking at the accusations by marilyn?  Was marilyn just mad at MB and josh and was calling about things that were not true or blown out of proportion?  Was lindsey telling marilyn things and marilyn thought they were worse than they were? 

see we don't KNOW, all I know is what marilyn is saying and that she does not know if there is a police report and also that the police did nothing about anything.  so what does that tell us?  It tells us either the police did not do their job and neither did cps, or... there is nothing bad going on to warrant any action by the police or cps. 

I also have info from another source other than marilyn about one of these incidents where there is a report.  And it had nothing at all to do with josh baum, and it was nothing that anyone got in trouble for nor did it warrant taking lindsey out of the home etc.  And from the extent of what I have been told actually happened, it was something that probably 80% or 90% of people would have done under the circumstances, IF the circumstances are such that I have been told.  However, am I told the truth?  I believe I was, as the police did not think this was out of line to do and no actionns were taken about it. 

Now why is marilyn saying all these horrible things were going on, I don't know.  She probably believes they were.  Obviously the police do not believe they were, or both the police and cps just did not care.  who really knows. 

as for the white car incident, supposedly marilyn is saying this happened a week before lindsey disappeared, however, marilyn HEARD about it, she did not KNOW about it.  Marilyn was not even living in McCleary at this time, she still does not live in McCleary.  She does have a lot of friends there and she does HEAR things. 

Now this is something I have no idea what this is about, but love4ever has dug up a court record for ML for assault in the summer of 2008.  I have no idea what this is about, but we can see that ML also assaults people.  So who do we believe here? 

I really don't know.  I do know what the report is about, and it has absolutely NOTHING AT ALL to do with josh baum.   



Thanks DD.

The info you have received reflects exactly the words of KaraK's posts at SM and mlachester comments at KOMO.  I am in the process of compiling backup to my contention.

KaraK:  The strained relationship between between mlachester and Melissa.

mlachester:  Frustration in regard to CPS and LE not taking 911 call  concerning Lindsey's allegations again Josh seriously.

Janet


these allegations were NOT against JOSH.  The report has absoluetly NOTHING to do with JOSH.  other than the one REPORT which someone told me about(not ML, as she does not know if there is a report or not) we don't know if there are any reports or not, but hopefully, with the phone number jessstar can find out.  The ONE report that someone states they do know exists is NOT about JOSH AT ALL. 

these calls were about a lot of things.  Please don't try to lump these calls onto JOSH.  It's not about that at all.


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3 7/28/09 -
Post by: Rob on August 08, 2009, 12:44:11 PM
<< snipped >>
as for the white car incident, supposedly marilyn is saying this happened a week before lindsey disappeared, however, marilyn HEARD about it, she did not KNOW about it.  Marilyn was not even living in McCleary at this time, she still does not live in McCleary.  She does have a lot of friends there and she does HEAR things.

<< snipped a bit more >>

and there you have it. Thanks DD... reminds me of a old kooky woman that lived in my neighborhood that peeked windows and walked the streets as if someone appointed her the neighborhood neb-nose. Lord only knows ALL the trouble she created.


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3 7/28/09 -
Post by: Tamikosmom on August 08, 2009, 12:47:57 PM
let me add to this info, as I believe people take all of this however they choose to further what they think, when actually, I have heard a LOT LOT more having to do with this but because it has NOTHING at all to do with Josh Baum and might be something that would sway people into thinking things they should not (because I can't post ALL of what this is about), then I think I should at least say what I personally think about all of this. 

I believe there is some on-going feud(if you will) between ML(marilyn Lachester) and MB(Melissa Baum).  supposedly marilyn has called the police on Melissa Baum 3-4 times and has called cps on her once.  This happened in the summer of 2008 as far as I am told.  Mind you I had someone who knows marilyn ask her specific questions and these are the answers I am getting(I intend to talk with Marilyn herself, to be certain this is actually what she said, however, I already believe the person who asked for me, but just to be able to say it is from the horses mouth, I intend to veryify all of this through Marilyn).... in the meantime I am sharing what I can from the person who asked her for me. 

I asked for the phone number the 911 call was called from and the date, so jessstar could try to find the report.  what I was told as an answer to these questions was:

911 was called in the summer of 2008.  Marilyn called 3-4 times to the police.  She called cps once on Melissa Baum.  This had nothing to do with Josh Baum.  Marilyn says she does not know if a report was made or not.  She called them and she does not know what they did concerning making a report, but she "assumes" there is an incident report because she called them.  So there very well might not be a report at all. 

Evidently, nothing happened about all of these calls because lindsey was still living at home with her mother.  So whatever it was which marilyn called about did not seem important enough to the police to do anything about it. 

Now I do know a couple of things marilyn called about, but I am not going to post that, she can post it somewhere if she chooses to do so, which it seems as though she has no qualms about posting about Melissa or Josh.

If marilyn is telling the truth about what she felt was wrong enough that she needed to call the police and cps, then the question is, was it really happening?  Well, evidently the police did not think it anything that warranted lindsey being taken out of the home or for her mother to be  in trouble etc;  so here is what you have to decided to believe.  Was there really anything that bad going on.  Did the police do their job in looking at the accusations by marilyn?  Was marilyn just mad at MB and josh and was calling about things that were not true or blown out of proportion?  Was lindsey telling marilyn things and marilyn thought they were worse than they were?

see we don't KNOW, all I know is what marilyn is saying and that she does not know if there is a police report and also that the police did nothing about anything.  so what does that tell us?  It tells us either the police did not do their job and neither did cps, or... there is nothing bad going on to warrant any action by the police or cps. 

I also have info from another source other than marilyn about one of these incidents where there is a report.  And it had nothing at all to do with josh baum, and it was nothing that anyone got in trouble for nor did it warrant taking lindsey out of the home etc.  And from the extent of what I have been told actually happened, it was something that probably 80% or 90% of people would have done under the circumstances, IF the circumstances are such that I have been told.  However, am I told the truth?  I believe I was, as the police did not think this was out of line to do and no actionns were taken about it. 

Now why is marilyn saying all these horrible things were going on, I don't know.  She probably believes they were.  Obviously the police do not believe they were, or both the police and cps just did not care.  who really knows. 

as for the white car incident, supposedly marilyn is saying this happened a week before lindsey disappeared, however, marilyn HEARD about it, she did not KNOW about it.  Marilyn was not even living in McCleary at this time, she still does not live in McCleary.  She does have a lot of friends there and she does HEAR things. 

Now this is something I have no idea what this is about, but love4ever has dug up a court record for ML for assault in the summer of 2008.  I have no idea what this is about, but we can see that ML also assaults people.  So who do we believe here? 

I really don't know.  I do know what the report is about, and it has absolutely NOTHING AT ALL to do with josh baum.   


DD

What if Lindsey is telling the truth regarding her brother's abuse?  What if mlachester is revealing exactly how the incident unfolded?

Janet



Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3 7/28/09 -
Post by: Tamikosmom on August 08, 2009, 12:56:29 PM
<< snipped >>
as for the white car incident, supposedly marilyn is saying this happened a week before lindsey disappeared, however, marilyn HEARD about it, she did not KNOW about it.  Marilyn was not even living in McCleary at this time, she still does not live in McCleary.  She does have a lot of friends there and she does HEAR things.

<< snipped a bit more >>

and there you have it. Thanks DD... reminds me of a old kooky woman that lived in my neighborhood that peeked windows and walked the streets as if someone appointed her the neighborhood neb-nose. Lord only knows ALL the trouble she created.

Rob

Could it be that mlachester was just being honest about the second hand information regarding the white vehicle?  After all ... she does claim that Lindsey's mother and LE are aware of the incident.

The incident involving Lindsey coming to mlachester home and sharing in regards to the abuse is not second hand.  The claim that 911 was called and LE picked up Lindsey and took her home was not second hand.  Rob ... DD's recent posts imply that there may be some truth to this first hand claim by mlachester.

Janet

++++++

mlachester:

To answer the questions everyone has asked, Yes I have talked to police and as far as things being unfounded its more of lazy work by cps and I don't know what the police were thinking. Since Lindsey has gone missing I have helped serch and put fliers up. I was called by the agents investigating and told them what I know. And this is no nick name everyone in McCleary knows who I am. Its no big secret she had came to my house to call 911 when her brother had done things to her. I hope lindsey is hiding and she finds a way to get to someone for help to tell them why. But as everyday gose by the fear gets worse.

http://www.king5.com/topstories/stories/NW_063009WAB-Mccleary-girl-search-LJ.1fc0b759.html?ocp=2#slcgm_comments_anchor


mlachester:
I am close to her and I know a lot more than the media or law enforcement are saying right now. As for Scanner, sorry if you don't like the truth but I have never been one to keep the truth in and she should of been taken the first time she called 911 from my house asking for help instead of put in a police car and taken back to her abuser!"

http://www.king5.com/topstories/stor...omments_anchor


mlachester:
Also people need to know Lindsey had told a friend a white car had been folling her and that another 11 year old girl was also talked to by someone a=in a white car the guy tryed to get her in by going as far as telling her she could drive the car. She ran and told her mom and yes the police knows this too.

http://www.king5.com/topstories/stor...omments_anchor





Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3 7/28/09 -
Post by: doubledecker on August 08, 2009, 01:05:59 PM
<< snipped >>
as for the white car incident, supposedly marilyn is saying this happened a week before lindsey disappeared, however, marilyn HEARD about it, she did not KNOW about it.  Marilyn was not even living in McCleary at this time, she still does not live in McCleary.  She does have a lot of friends there and she does HEAR things.

<< snipped a bit more >>

 

and there you have it. Thanks DD... reminds me of a old kooky woman that lived in my neighborhood that peeked windows and walked the streets as if someone appointed her the neighborhood neb-nose. Lord only knows ALL the trouble she created.


in the beginning she said there was a report, there was paperwork etc, now she does not know if the police wrote a report.  now someone else knows there was a report but had nothing to do with josh baum.  and both the police and cps thought enough about any of this to do anything. 

at first marilyn knew there was a white car, that lindsey told her about it, NOW she has heard about this, and it happened at the time marilyn was not living in Mccleary, so how would lindsey tell her about this car if marily was not living in mccleary, was lindsey over in another town talking to marilyn?  see, the stories change, the more you dig the more they change.  at this point I don't know how to believe, but everytime the story changes I am less likely to believe the person. 

In all fairness it is not only marilyn's story which changes, it is a bunch of people.  makes you wonder what the heck is wrong with these people.  grrrr.  all these lies send us on wild goose chases when we could be staying on tract.  is this the agenda of some to these people, so send us on wild goose chases to get us away from the truth;  sometimes I wonder. 

this is why I need to talk with marilyn herself to make sure someone is not misunderstanding what she is saying... however, I don't believe for one second the person relaying the information to me is misunderstanding, but I have to be sure.


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3 7/28/09 -
Post by: love4ever on August 08, 2009, 01:09:15 PM
Just for the record, I find discrepencies in Mlachester claims of innocence...

 Sunday, July 05, 2009
   
Lindsey
Ok so lets clear up the BS. I have been reading some crap online that people have to say. For one under a pic of me and my husband it say he has stood by me threw it all! Someone wanted to know if it was bad stuff. Well When married as long as we have been there are all kinds of bumps in the road. But what i an talking about was when I was injured and could not work. I became upset with myself and felt usless. But he pulled me threw that as I recovred. He supported me while I went back to school and learned a new skill. Now lets talk about my court record! I had to go to court because my dogs were barking and one day one got out. Oh My goodness I had to pay a 50 dollar fine because my dog got out and was running. If anyone wants too know something. Here I am ask. I am the most upfront person there is. Send me an e-mail on here. I don't get on here everyday but I do enough I will get back to you in a day or so. As far as the abuse Lindsey went threw the MPD knows the FBI also knows. They have the reports I help Lindsey file. But people lets face it she never went anywhere without he Cell. Did she have it at her friends house she left the night she dissapered? Because its at her home now "well maybe in evidence". Let all get back to the real picture here. Let keep praying nothing did happen to her at home and pray she will make back safe and alive. Just as of this moring when the FBI was at my house I made a comment about the 911 calls and the call to CPS. They replied with I am sure we have all those records.  So they know what is going on. And for all you on scared monkeys pulling up my step son law record and names of people you think may be my realitives that should have nothing to do with finding lindsey. And yes I have a son around her age who is her friend. But he is none of your concern that also will not help find lindsey. And yes he talked to the FBI also. People need to leave him alone he's a child. http://www.missingkids.com/missingkids/servlet/PubCaseSearchServlet?act=viewChildDetail&LanguageCountry=en_US&searchLang=en_US&caseLang=en_US&orgPrefix=NCMC&caseNum=1125977&seqNum=1

http://blogs.myspace.com/index.cfm?fuseaction=blog.view&friendId=47138410&blogId=498637401

Versus...

BURNS, MARILYN AUDREY MARIE

Female, Age: 31
ID:10721
Book-No

Statute:
9A.36.041 - Assault 4
165354

Offense:
DOMV - Domestic Violence

Arrest Type:
CIT
Booked

Charging Agency:
MCPD-McCleary Police Department
6/28/2008 04:15

Court:
MCMU-McCleary Municipal
Released

Bail Amount:
No Bail
6/30/2008 18:00
Disposition:
PRD-Released on Personal Recog

http://www.co.grays-harbor.wa.us/info/sheriff/JailRegisters/InmateDetail.asp?SrchNameNo=10721

In refrence to the charge above...


RCW 9A.36.041
Assault in the fourth degree.


(1) A person is guilty of assault in the fourth degree if, under circumstances not amounting to assault in the first, second, or third degree, or custodial assault, he or she assaults another.

(2) Assault in the fourth degree is a gross misdemeanor.

[1987 c 188 § 2; 1986 c 257 § 7.]



This bothers me! If she is the one writing in her blog and declaring her only court appearance was that in regards to her dog, then this is a lie! Even if she finds embarrasment for such a record, it does not qualify as stating the truth of her innocence when such a case (Lindseys), it just makes it worse as being a person of interest!!


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3 7/28/09 -
Post by: pink angel on August 08, 2009, 01:10:12 PM
<< snipped >>
as for the white car incident, supposedly marilyn is saying this happened a week before lindsey disappeared, however, marilyn HEARD about it, she did not KNOW about it.  Marilyn was not even living in McCleary at this time, she still does not live in McCleary.  She does have a lot of friends there and she does HEAR things.

<< snipped a bit more >>

and there you have it. Thanks DD... reminds me of a old kooky woman that lived in my neighborhood that peeked windows and walked the streets as if someone appointed her the neighborhood neb-nose. Lord only knows ALL the trouble she created.

I agree Rob, sounds like a game of telephone tag. The story changes each time "it's heard".


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3 7/28/09 -
Post by: AZSunny on August 08, 2009, 01:10:41 PM
<< snipped >>
as for the white car incident, supposedly marilyn is saying this happened a week before lindsey disappeared, however, marilyn HEARD about it, she did not KNOW about it.  Marilyn was not even living in McCleary at this time, she still does not live in McCleary.  She does have a lot of friends there and she does HEAR things.

<< snipped a bit more >>

and there you have it. Thanks DD... reminds me of a old kooky woman that lived in my neighborhood that peeked windows and walked the streets as if someone appointed her the neighborhood neb-nose. Lord only knows ALL the trouble she created.

Rob

Could it be that mlachester was just being honest about the second hand information regarding the white vehicle?  After all ... she does claim that Lindsey's mother and LE are aware of the incident.

The incident involving Lindsey coming to mlachester home and sharing in regards to the abuse is not second hand.  The claim that 911 was called and LE picked up Lindsey and took her home was not second hand.  Rob ... DD's recent posts imply that there may be some truth to this first hand claim by mlachester.

Janet

++++++

mlachester:

To answer the questions everyone has asked, Yes I have talked to police and as far as things being unfounded its more of lazy work by cps and I don't know what the police were thinking. Since Lindsey has gone missing I have helped serch and put fliers up. I was called by the agents investigating and told them what I know. And this is no nick name everyone in McCleary knows who I am. Its no big secret she had came to my house to call 911 when her brother had done things to her. I hope lindsey is hiding and she finds a way to get to someone for help to tell them why. But as everyday gose by the fear gets worse.

http://www.king5.com/topstories/stories/NW_063009WAB-Mccleary-girl-search-LJ.1fc0b759.html?ocp=2#slcgm_comments_anchor


mlachester:
I am close to her and I know a lot more than the media or law enforcement are saying right now. As for Scanner, sorry if you don't like the truth but I have never been one to keep the truth in and she should of been taken the first time she called 911 from my house asking for help instead of put in a police car and taken back to her abuser!"

http://www.king5.com/topstories/stor...omments_anchor


mlachester:
Also people need to know Lindsey had told a friend a white car had been folling her and that another 11 year old girl was also talked to by someone a=in a white car the guy tryed to get her in by going as far as telling her she could drive the car. She ran and told her mom and yes the police knows this too.

http://www.king5.com/topstories/stor...omments_anchor





Janet, If Marilyn doesn't even live in McCleary, "and only hears things"  how was Lindsey able to go to her house and call 911?  Makes no sense.   I am with DD.  This isn't about Josh at all.


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3 7/28/09 -
Post by: Tamikosmom on August 08, 2009, 01:12:05 PM
DD'S SOURCE - MLACHESTER'S FRIEND


Is DD in contact with mlachester?

Janet

I am in contact with a good friend of marilyn's family and this person ask Marilyn specifically the questions I asked her to ask.  Marilyn also told her that I can talk with her(marilyn) personally and I intend on getting ahold of Marilyn herself TODAY.  This was Marilyn's suggestion as I am told through the family friend.  I did not wish to bother marilyn but because I have been invited by her to talk with her, I will.


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3 7/28/09 -
Post by: doubledecker on August 08, 2009, 01:19:43 PM
let me add to this info, as I believe people take all of this however they choose to further what they think, when actually, I have heard a LOT LOT more having to do with this but because it has NOTHING at all to do with Josh Baum and might be something that would sway people into thinking things they should not (because I can't post ALL of what this is about), then I think I should at least say what I personally think about all of this. 

I believe there is some on-going feud(if you will) between ML(marilyn Lachester) and MB(Melissa Baum).  supposedly marilyn has called the police on Melissa Baum 3-4 times and has called cps on her once.  This happened in the summer of 2008 as far as I am told.  Mind you I had someone who knows marilyn ask her specific questions and these are the answers I am getting(I intend to talk with Marilyn herself, to be certain this is actually what she said, however, I already believe the person who asked for me, but just to be able to say it is from the horses mouth, I intend to veryify all of this through Marilyn).... in the meantime I am sharing what I can from the person who asked her for me. 

I asked for the phone number the 911 call was called from and the date, so jessstar could try to find the report.  what I was told as an answer to these questions was:

911 was called in the summer of 2008.  Marilyn called 3-4 times to the police.  She called cps once on Melissa Baum.  This had nothing to do with Josh Baum.  Marilyn says she does not know if a report was made or not.  She called them and she does not know what they did concerning making a report, but she "assumes" there is an incident report because she called them.  So there very well might not be a report at all. 

Evidently, nothing happened about all of these calls because lindsey was still living at home with her mother.  So whatever it was which marilyn called about did not seem important enough to the police to do anything about it. 

Now I do know a couple of things marilyn called about, but I am not going to post that, she can post it somewhere if she chooses to do so, which it seems as though she has no qualms about posting about Melissa or Josh.

If marilyn is telling the truth about what she felt was wrong enough that she needed to call the police and cps, then the question is, was it really happening?  Well, evidently the police did not think it anything that warranted lindsey being taken out of the home or for her mother to be  in trouble etc;  so here is what you have to decided to believe.  Was there really anything that bad going on.  Did the police do their job in looking at the accusations by marilyn?  Was marilyn just mad at MB and josh and was calling about things that were not true or blown out of proportion?  Was lindsey telling marilyn things and marilyn thought they were worse than they were?

see we don't KNOW, all I know is what marilyn is saying and that she does not know if there is a police report and also that the police did nothing about anything.  so what does that tell us?  It tells us either the police did not do their job and neither did cps, or... there is nothing bad going on to warrant any action by the police or cps. 

I also have info from another source other than marilyn about one of these incidents where there is a report.  And it had nothing at all to do with josh baum, and it was nothing that anyone got in trouble for nor did it warrant taking lindsey out of the home etc.  And from the extent of what I have been told actually happened, it was something that probably 80% or 90% of people would have done under the circumstances, IF the circumstances are such that I have been told.  However, am I told the truth?  I believe I was, as the police did not think this was out of line to do and no actionns were taken about it. 

Now why is marilyn saying all these horrible things were going on, I don't know.  She probably believes they were.  Obviously the police do not believe they were, or both the police and cps just did not care.  who really knows. 

as for the white car incident, supposedly marilyn is saying this happened a week before lindsey disappeared, however, marilyn HEARD about it, she did not KNOW about it.  Marilyn was not even living in McCleary at this time, she still does not live in McCleary.  She does have a lot of friends there and she does HEAR things. 

Now this is something I have no idea what this is about, but love4ever has dug up a court record for ML for assault in the summer of 2008.  I have no idea what this is about, but we can see that ML also assaults people.  So who do we believe here? 

I really don't know.  I do know what the report is about, and it has absolutely NOTHING AT ALL to do with josh baum.   


DD

What if Lindsey is telling the truth regarding her brother's abuse?  What if mlachester is revealing exactly how the incident unfolded?

Janet



there is always a possibility it is true, we can never say it can't be because it is always possible it is.  I have seen police and cps overlook a lot of things with other people when they should have taken the kids out of the home, but rather made the kids stay in the abuse, stuff a lot worse than this.  so I am not going to say it can't be true; it can be.  So this is why they police look at josh and lindsey's mother as POSSIBLY being responsible for lindsey's disappearance.  The feds came into this case.  I am sure they looked at josh, especially, with marilyn harping all of this stuff in the cops' ears.  And she did harp about it to them, so we know they were aware of this.  So the feds and the police on lindsey missing person case did check out josh.  They did check out things about where he was and where he goes etc.  (not saying how I know this, and it might not be true, but the person saying it would NEVER lie about THAT, believe me they want josh to be the guilty one, and even they say the police checked out josh etc)... so I have to believe if the feds were on the case and if they checked out josh, then they did not find anything.  OR... they did and they are on it, but can't figure it out....which I have a hard time believing the feds can't figure out josh baum.  but if he is involved, be assured the police have not overlooked him. and i would think if they really suspected josh they would have interrogated the heck out of him and he would not have held up under the feds. 

but for your peace of mind, the police did check out josh... so as you keep saying about a free pass, he did NOT get one.  he was looked at. 

I do believe the police are looking at people.  they went two states away to talk with adam campbell, they went to pierce county to talk to the lady and to look at ft lewis.  I know this straight from the horses mouth, the detective.  they asked me for information, so they were interested in looking at things.  they are not ignoring people.  they took the time to talk with me on the phone, they emailed me more than once.  they are looking.  they are not just sitting there twiddling their thumbs.  so if josh is involved they will keep looking.  they really are not being lax on this.  I honestly believe they know something and they are trying to figure out where she is before they go saying anything about it.  They have to know people are lying.  I know people are lying, so how much more would they know it.  they have tons of info and databases I don't have access to, boy if I did, I could figure out a lot more, but with what little I do have and what few contacts I have, I KNOW people are lying.  and they have told me a ton of lies. 

but as for josh, it is still my personal opinion he is not responsible for lindsey missing.  And I do believe 100% the police did look at him and would have known by now if he did this.

you have every right to your own opinion about josh doing this, but I believe for me to keep trying to look at josh is for me to be sent on another wild goose chase.   


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3 7/28/09 -
Post by: JessStar on August 08, 2009, 01:19:58 PM
I have a phone number those calls were made from for the report, I have the time PERIOD but no actual date.  I can't post the phone number on here.

 ::MonkeyShocked::
WOW that is interesting.

As soon as DD emails me this information, I will be following up and will request the records.  I probably cannot get the CPS records (assuming they even exist), but I should be able to get the 911 records.


do I have your email already? if so I will go through my email to get it, if not can you have klaas send it to me

thanks

DD-  yes you have it.  In fact, I sent you an email yesterday.  If you didn't get it, let me know.  Thank you.



Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3 7/28/09 -
Post by: love4ever on August 08, 2009, 01:22:34 PM
Just for the record..

 Festus III Lachester - Marilyn Burns - Grays Harbor Marriage Records 

http://www.digitalarchives.wa.gov/ViewRecord.aspx?RID=99A9AB36C2FE346FA5A9FE89A03EDEC7


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3 7/28/09 -
Post by: Tamikosmom on August 08, 2009, 01:22:42 PM

in the beginning she said there was a report, there was paperwork etc, now she does not know if the police wrote a report.  now someone else knows there was a report but had nothing to do with josh baum.  and both the police and cps thought enough about any of this to do anything. 

at first marilyn knew there was a white car, that lindsey told her about it, NOW she has heard about this, and it happened at the time marilyn was not living in Mccleary, so how would lindsey tell her about this car if marily was not living in mccleary, was lindsey over in another town talking to marilyn?  see, the stories change, the more you dig the more they change.  at this point I don't know how to believe, but everytime the story changes I am less likely to believe the person. 

In all fairness it is not only marilyn's story which changes, it is a bunch of people.  makes you wonder what the heck is wrong with these people.  grrrr.  all these lies send us on wild goose chases when we could be staying on tract.  is this the agenda of some to these people, so send us on wild goose chases to get us away from the truth;  sometimes I wonder. 

this is why I need to talk with marilyn herself to make sure someone is not misunderstanding what she is saying... however, I don't believe for one second the person relaying the information to me is misunderstanding, but I have to be sure.

I believe that the implication mlachester's words in the KOMO comments are very clear.  So ... either she is lying or she is telling the truth.  Until proven to that she is lying ... I will continue to give her the benefit of the doubt.  The alleged incident with Lindsey which involved 911 and the small McCleary police force ... reinforces my ongoing belief that mlachester is being truthful.

DD ... I concede ... I could be wrong and ... you could be right in your words in a preceding post that mlachester could be just a troublemaker.  You and KaraK are one.  She holds no weight in this woman's words.

Janet 


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3 7/28/09 -
Post by: doubledecker on August 08, 2009, 01:25:41 PM
Just for the record, I find discrepencies in Mlachester claims of innocence...

 Sunday, July 05, 2009
   
Lindsey
Ok so lets clear up the BS. I have been reading some crap online that people have to say. For one under a pic of me and my husband it say he has stood by me threw it all! Someone wanted to know if it was bad stuff. Well When married as long as we have been there are all kinds of bumps in the road. But what i an talking about was when I was injured and could not work. I became upset with myself and felt usless. But he pulled me threw that as I recovred. He supported me while I went back to school and learned a new skill. Now lets talk about my court record! I had to go to court because my dogs were barking and one day one got out. Oh My goodness I had to pay a 50 dollar fine because my dog got out and was running. If anyone wants too know something. Here I am ask. I am the most upfront person there is. Send me an e-mail on here. I don't get on here everyday but I do enough I will get back to you in a day or so. As far as the abuse Lindsey went threw the MPD knows the FBI also knows. They have the reports I help Lindsey file. But people lets face it she never went anywhere without he Cell. Did she have it at her friends house she left the night she dissapered? Because its at her home now "well maybe in evidence". Let all get back to the real picture here. Let keep praying nothing did happen to her at home and pray she will make back safe and alive. Just as of this moring when the FBI was at my house I made a comment about the 911 calls and the call to CPS. They replied with I am sure we have all those records.  So they know what is going on. And for all you on scared monkeys pulling up my step son law record and names of people you think may be my realitives that should have nothing to do with finding lindsey. And yes I have a son around her age who is her friend. But he is none of your concern that also will not help find lindsey. And yes he talked to the FBI also. People need to leave him alone he's a child. http://www.missingkids.com/missingkids/servlet/PubCaseSearchServlet?act=viewChildDetail&LanguageCountry=en_US&searchLang=en_US&caseLang=en_US&orgPrefix=NCMC&caseNum=1125977&seqNum=1

http://blogs.myspace.com/index.cfm?fuseaction=blog.view&friendId=47138410&blogId=498637401

Versus...

BURNS, MARILYN AUDREY MARIE

Female, Age: 31
ID:10721
Book-No

Statute:
9A.36.041 - Assault 4
165354

Offense:
DOMV - Domestic Violence

Arrest Type:
CIT
Booked

Charging Agency:
MCPD-McCleary Police Department
6/28/2008 04:15

Court:
MCMU-McCleary Municipal
Released

Bail Amount:
No Bail
6/30/2008 18:00
Disposition:
PRD-Released on Personal Recog

http://www.co.grays-harbor.wa.us/info/sheriff/JailRegisters/InmateDetail.asp?SrchNameNo=10721

In refrence to the charge above...


RCW 9A.36.041
Assault in the fourth degree.


(1) A person is guilty of assault in the fourth degree if, under circumstances not amounting to assault in the first, second, or third degree, or custodial assault, he or she assaults another.

(2) Assault in the fourth degree is a gross misdemeanor.

[1987 c 188 § 2; 1986 c 257 § 7.]



This bothers me! If she is the one writing in her blog and declaring her only court appearance was that in regards to her dog, then this is a lie! Even if she finds embarrasment for such a record, it does not qualify as stating the truth of her innocence when such a case (Lindseys), it just makes it worse as being a person of interest!!


and right there she states she HAS THE REPORTS SHE HELPED LINDSEY FILE...

NOW she is saying she does not know if there are any reports or not, that she called but she does not know what they did. 


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3 7/28/09 -
Post by: JessStar on August 08, 2009, 01:27:57 PM

in the beginning she said there was a report, there was paperwork etc, now she does not know if the police wrote a report.  now someone else knows there was a report but had nothing to do with josh baum.  and both the police and cps thought enough about any of this to do anything. 

at first marilyn knew there was a white car, that lindsey told her about it, NOW she has heard about this, and it happened at the time marilyn was not living in Mccleary, so how would lindsey tell her about this car if marily was not living in mccleary, was lindsey over in another town talking to marilyn?  see, the stories change, the more you dig the more they change.  at this point I don't know how to believe, but everytime the story changes I am less likely to believe the person. 

In all fairness it is not only marilyn's story which changes, it is a bunch of people.  makes you wonder what the heck is wrong with these people.  grrrr.  all these lies send us on wild goose chases when we could be staying on tract.  is this the agenda of some to these people, so send us on wild goose chases to get us away from the truth;  sometimes I wonder. 

this is why I need to talk with marilyn herself to make sure someone is not misunderstanding what she is saying... however, I don't believe for one second the person relaying the information to me is misunderstanding, but I have to be sure.

I believe that the implication mlachester's words in the KOMO comments are very clear.  So ... either she is lying or she is telling the truth.  Until proven to that she is lying ... I will continue to give her the benefit of the doubt.  The alleged incident with Lindsey which involved 911 and the small McCleary police force ... reinforces my ongoing belief that mlachester is being truthful.

DD ... I concede ... I could be wrong and ... you could be right in your words in a preceding post that mlachester could be just a troublemaker.  You and KaraK are one.  She holds no weight in this woman's words.

Janet 

For the record, there's a RECORD of every 911 call ever made.  I'm not looking for a formal police report.  All 911 calls are recorded.  So if she made 911 calls, there will be records of them.  I'm just hoping the time period is detailed enough.  The less detailed, the longer it takes to get the information.  If she could narrow it down even to the month it would be great.



Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3 7/28/09 -
Post by: doubledecker on August 08, 2009, 01:28:50 PM
<< snipped >>
as for the white car incident, supposedly marilyn is saying this happened a week before lindsey disappeared, however, marilyn HEARD about it, she did not KNOW about it.  Marilyn was not even living in McCleary at this time, she still does not live in McCleary.  She does have a lot of friends there and she does HEAR things.

<< snipped a bit more >>

and there you have it. Thanks DD... reminds me of a old kooky woman that lived in my neighborhood that peeked windows and walked the streets as if someone appointed her the neighborhood neb-nose. Lord only knows ALL the trouble she created.

Rob

Could it be that mlachester was just being honest about the second hand information regarding the white vehicle?  After all ... she does claim that Lindsey's mother and LE are aware of the incident.

The incident involving Lindsey coming to mlachester home and sharing in regards to the abuse is not second hand.  The claim that 911 was called and LE picked up Lindsey and took her home was not second hand.  Rob ... DD's recent posts imply that there may be some truth to this first hand claim by mlachester.

Janet

++++++

mlachester:

To answer the questions everyone has asked, Yes I have talked to police and as far as things being unfounded its more of lazy work by cps and I don't know what the police were thinking. Since Lindsey has gone missing I have helped serch and put fliers up. I was called by the agents investigating and told them what I know. And this is no nick name everyone in McCleary knows who I am. Its no big secret she had came to my house to call 911 when her brother had done things to her. I hope lindsey is hiding and she finds a way to get to someone for help to tell them why. But as everyday gose by the fear gets worse.

http://www.king5.com/topstories/stories/NW_063009WAB-Mccleary-girl-search-LJ.1fc0b759.html?ocp=2#slcgm_comments_anchor


mlachester:
I am close to her and I know a lot more than the media or law enforcement are saying right now. As for Scanner, sorry if you don't like the truth but I have never been one to keep the truth in and she should of been taken the first time she called 911 from my house asking for help instead of put in a police car and taken back to her abuser!"

http://www.king5.com/topstories/stor...omments_anchor


mlachester:
Also people need to know Lindsey had told a friend a white car had been folling her and that another 11 year old girl was also talked to by someone a=in a white car the guy tryed to get her in by going as far as telling her she could drive the car. She ran and told her mom and yes the police knows this too.

http://www.king5.com/topstories/stor...omments_anchor





Janet, If Marilyn doesn't even live in McCleary, "and only hears things"  how was Lindsey able to go to her house and call 911?  Makes no sense.   I am with DD.  This isn't about Josh at all.

marilyn HAD lived in mccleary at pine and 1st street, but she moved.  I know why she moved, but I am not posting that, but it has nothing at all to do with anything in this case or lindsey or people etc, AS SO I AM TOLD(but who knows LOL).  it was a financial decision I am told so she moved to another town.   I am not sure exactly when this happened but being her house is for sale and being there are some records regarding that house, (if someone digs, I haven't dug it up, no time, but it should be there), then it should give an approx date she left that house.

but she has not lived in mccleary for awhile now.


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3 7/28/09 -
Post by: Rob on August 08, 2009, 01:29:38 PM
Quote
Well When married as long as we have been there are all kinds of bumps in the road

such as?

Quote
As far as the abuse Lindsey went threw the MPD knows the FBI also knows.

again - such as?

Quote
They have the reports I help Lindsey file

maybe they were there to see what marilyn's real story is and if she is conjuring up tales - juss sayin'

Quote
But people lets face it she never went anywhere without he Cell

apparently she DID - it was at home the night she was abducted - marliyn is wrong here for sure.

Quote
Did she have it at her friends house she left the night she dissapered?

apparently NO is the answer. It's part of the official record.

Quote
Let all get back to the real picture here

marilyn WASN'T there and didn't witness anything and doesn't live in McCleary. So what is the REAL picture?

Quote
Just as of this moring when the FBI was at my house I made a comment about the 911 calls and the call to CPS.

probably after reading some of these accusations she made on message boards - just sayin'...

Quote
And for all you on scared monkeys pulling up my step son law record and names of people you think may be my realitives that should have nothing to do with finding lindsey

no marilyn, but it does often show your own personal character... and any motive you may have.

Quote
And yes I have a son around her age who is her friend. But he is none of your concern that also will not help find lindsey

why mention it then?

Quote
BURNS, MARILYN AUDREY MARIE

Female, Age: 31
ID:10721
Book-No

Statute:
9A.36.041 - Assault 4
165354

Offense:
DOMV - Domestic Violence

Arrest Type:
CIT
Booked

Charging Agency:
MCPD-McCleary Police Department
6/28/2008 04:15
Court:
MCMU-McCleary Municipal
Released

Bail Amount:
No Bail
6/30/2008 18:00
Disposition:
PRD-Released on Personal Recog

doesn't look like a dog running loose - just sayin!



Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3 7/28/09 -
Post by: Rob on August 08, 2009, 01:33:04 PM
<< snipped >>
as for the white car incident, supposedly marilyn is saying this happened a week before lindsey disappeared, however, marilyn HEARD about it, she did not KNOW about it.  Marilyn was not even living in McCleary at this time, she still does not live in McCleary.  She does have a lot of friends there and she does HEAR things.

<< snipped a bit more >>

and there you have it. Thanks DD... reminds me of a old kooky woman that lived in my neighborhood that peeked windows and walked the streets as if someone appointed her the neighborhood neb-nose. Lord only knows ALL the trouble she created.

I agree Rob, sounds like a game of telephone tag. The story changes each time "it's heard".

Hi pink angel - I agree - at most it's hersay - at worst it's an outright lie intended to hurt someone and screw an investigation into a missing child.


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3 7/28/09 -
Post by: Tamikosmom on August 08, 2009, 01:33:12 PM
let me add to this info, as I believe people take all of this however they choose to further what they think, when actually, I have heard a LOT LOT more having to do with this but because it has NOTHING at all to do with Josh Baum and might be something that would sway people into thinking things they should not (because I can't post ALL of what this is about), then I think I should at least say what I personally think about all of this. 

I believe there is some on-going feud(if you will) between ML(marilyn Lachester) and MB(Melissa Baum).  supposedly marilyn has called the police on Melissa Baum 3-4 times and has called cps on her once.  This happened in the summer of 2008 as far as I am told.  Mind you I had someone who knows marilyn ask her specific questions and these are the answers I am getting(I intend to talk with Marilyn herself, to be certain this is actually what she said, however, I already believe the person who asked for me, but just to be able to say it is from the horses mouth, I intend to veryify all of this through Marilyn).... in the meantime I am sharing what I can from the person who asked her for me. 

I asked for the phone number the 911 call was called from and the date, so jessstar could try to find the report.  what I was told as an answer to these questions was:

911 was called in the summer of 2008.  Marilyn called 3-4 times to the police.  She called cps once on Melissa Baum.  This had nothing to do with Josh Baum.  Marilyn says she does not know if a report was made or not.  She called them and she does not know what they did concerning making a report, but she "assumes" there is an incident report because she called them.  So there very well might not be a report at all. 

Evidently, nothing happened about all of these calls because lindsey was still living at home with her mother.  So whatever it was which marilyn called about did not seem important enough to the police to do anything about it. 

Now I do know a couple of things marilyn called about, but I am not going to post that, she can post it somewhere if she chooses to do so, which it seems as though she has no qualms about posting about Melissa or Josh.

If marilyn is telling the truth about what she felt was wrong enough that she needed to call the police and cps, then the question is, was it really happening?  Well, evidently the police did not think it anything that warranted lindsey being taken out of the home or for her mother to be  in trouble etc;  so here is what you have to decided to believe.  Was there really anything that bad going on.  Did the police do their job in looking at the accusations by marilyn?  Was marilyn just mad at MB and josh and was calling about things that were not true or blown out of proportion?  Was lindsey telling marilyn things and marilyn thought they were worse than they were?

see we don't KNOW, all I know is what marilyn is saying and that she does not know if there is a police report and also that the police did nothing about anything.  so what does that tell us?  It tells us either the police did not do their job and neither did cps, or... there is nothing bad going on to warrant any action by the police or cps. 

I also have info from another source other than marilyn about one of these incidents where there is a report.  And it had nothing at all to do with josh baum, and it was nothing that anyone got in trouble for nor did it warrant taking lindsey out of the home etc.  And from the extent of what I have been told actually happened, it was something that probably 80% or 90% of people would have done under the circumstances, IF the circumstances are such that I have been told.  However, am I told the truth?  I believe I was, as the police did not think this was out of line to do and no actionns were taken about it. 

Now why is marilyn saying all these horrible things were going on, I don't know.  She probably believes they were.  Obviously the police do not believe they were, or both the police and cps just did not care.  who really knows. 

as for the white car incident, supposedly marilyn is saying this happened a week before lindsey disappeared, however, marilyn HEARD about it, she did not KNOW about it.  Marilyn was not even living in McCleary at this time, she still does not live in McCleary.  She does have a lot of friends there and she does HEAR things. 

Now this is something I have no idea what this is about, but love4ever has dug up a court record for ML for assault in the summer of 2008.  I have no idea what this is about, but we can see that ML also assaults people.  So who do we believe here? 

I really don't know.  I do know what the report is about, and it has absolutely NOTHING AT ALL to do with josh baum.   


DD

What if Lindsey is telling the truth regarding her brother's abuse?  What if mlachester is revealing exactly how the incident unfolded?

Janet



<snipped>

... but for your peace of mind, the police did check out josh... so as you keep saying about a free pass, he did NOT get one.  he was looked at.

<snipped> 


 ::MonkeyShocked::

Link please.

DD ... I have not read one quote from Kara, Melissa or Sheriff Scott that Josh Baum was considered a person of interest in the process of elimination in the investigation and ...  was interrogated accordingly.

One quote in regards to a police interrogation or ... one quote that reveals that Josh Baum went home per the family friend's instructions ... one quote that reveals that this young man was with his Mom when his sister left the Kampen/Williams residence ... will shut this wannabe detective up in regards to Josh Baum.

KaraK would not answer me directly in regards to whether Josh Baum went straight home as instructed following the argument with his sister.

Janet



Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3 7/28/09 -
Post by: doubledecker on August 08, 2009, 01:37:09 PM
jessstar ...

I did not get any email from you yesterday but I did get one just now from you, and will answer here in a sec, so be  watching your email.  I have to go outside for a minute first.


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3 7/28/09 -
Post by: Tamikosmom on August 08, 2009, 01:37:10 PM

in the beginning she said there was a report, there was paperwork etc, now she does not know if the police wrote a report.  now someone else knows there was a report but had nothing to do with josh baum.  and both the police and cps thought enough about any of this to do anything. 

at first marilyn knew there was a white car, that lindsey told her about it, NOW she has heard about this, and it happened at the time marilyn was not living in Mccleary, so how would lindsey tell her about this car if marily was not living in mccleary, was lindsey over in another town talking to marilyn?  see, the stories change, the more you dig the more they change.  at this point I don't know how to believe, but everytime the story changes I am less likely to believe the person. 

In all fairness it is not only marilyn's story which changes, it is a bunch of people.  makes you wonder what the heck is wrong with these people.  grrrr.  all these lies send us on wild goose chases when we could be staying on tract.  is this the agenda of some to these people, so send us on wild goose chases to get us away from the truth;  sometimes I wonder. 

this is why I need to talk with marilyn herself to make sure someone is not misunderstanding what she is saying... however, I don't believe for one second the person relaying the information to me is misunderstanding, but I have to be sure.

I believe that the implication mlachester's words in the KOMO comments are very clear.  So ... either she is lying or she is telling the truth.  Until proven to that she is lying ... I will continue to give her the benefit of the doubt.  The alleged incident with Lindsey which involved 911 and the small McCleary police force ... reinforces my ongoing belief that mlachester is being truthful.

DD ... I concede ... I could be wrong and ... you could be right in your words in a preceding post that mlachester could be just a troublemaker.  You and KaraK are one.  She holds no weight in this woman's words.

Janet 

For the record, there's a RECORD of every 911 call ever made.  I'm not looking for a formal police report.  All 911 calls are recorded.  So if she made 911 calls, there will be records of them.  I'm just hoping the time period is detailed enough.  The less detailed, the longer it takes to get the information.  If she could narrow it down even to the month it would be great.



I though all 911 calls were public record but ... I was not sure.

Thank you Jess.

Janet


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3 7/28/09 -
Post by: Tamikosmom on August 08, 2009, 01:44:02 PM
Quote
Well When married as long as we have been there are all kinds of bumps in the road

such as?

Quote
As far as the abuse Lindsey went threw the MPD knows the FBI also knows.

again - such as?

Quote
They have the reports I help Lindsey file

maybe they were there to see what marilyn's real story is and if she is conjuring up tales - juss sayin'

Quote
But people lets face it she never went anywhere without he Cell

apparently she DID - it was at home the night she was abducted - marliyn is wrong here for sure.

Quote
Did she have it at her friends house she left the night she dissapered?

apparently NO is the answer. It's part of the official record.

Quote
Let all get back to the real picture here

marilyn WASN'T there and didn't witness anything and doesn't live in McCleary. So what is the REAL picture?

Quote
Just as of this moring when the FBI was at my house I made a comment about the 911 calls and the call to CPS.

probably after reading some of these accusations she made on message boards - just sayin'...

Quote
And for all you on scared monkeys pulling up my step son law record and names of people you think may be my realitives that should have nothing to do with finding lindsey

no marilyn, but it does often show your own personal character... and any motive you may have.

Quote
And yes I have a son around her age who is her friend. But he is none of your concern that also will not help find lindsey

why mention it then?

Quote
BURNS, MARILYN AUDREY MARIE

Female, Age: 31
ID:10721
Book-No

Statute:
9A.36.041 - Assault 4
165354

Offense:
DOMV - Domestic Violence

Arrest Type:
CIT
Booked

Charging Agency:
MCPD-McCleary Police Department
6/28/2008 04:15
Court:
MCMU-McCleary Municipal
Released

Bail Amount:
No Bail
6/30/2008 18:00
Disposition:
PRD-Released on Personal Recog

doesn't look like a dog running loose - just sayin!



Rob

Melissa Baum stated that Lindsey never went anywhere without her cell.  However ... this fateful evening her cell was left at home charging.

It appears that there is an effort to discredit mlachester's words prior to any proof that she is fabricating.

Let's wait and see.  The truth will be revealed.

I am off.

Janet



Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3 7/28/09 -
Post by: no rose colored glasses on August 08, 2009, 01:44:50 PM
love4ever before I go back to the previous page just wanted to say thanks to you also for the info. Why are people's statements changing. One other thing about the dog, could it have been Lindsey's mom who called about the dog that got loose? That could sure start a feud  ::MonkeyEek:: I've seen that happen in my own neighborhood  ::MonkeyNoNo::


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3 7/28/09 -
Post by: doubledecker on August 08, 2009, 01:52:08 PM
let me add to this info, as I believe people take all of this however they choose to further what they think, when actually, I have heard a LOT LOT more having to do with this but because it has NOTHING at all to do with Josh Baum and might be something that would sway people into thinking things they should not (because I can't post ALL of what this is about), then I think I should at least say what I personally think about all of this. 

I believe there is some on-going feud(if you will) between ML(marilyn Lachester) and MB(Melissa Baum).  supposedly marilyn has called the police on Melissa Baum 3-4 times and has called cps on her once.  This happened in the summer of 2008 as far as I am told.  Mind you I had someone who knows marilyn ask her specific questions and these are the answers I am getting(I intend to talk with Marilyn herself, to be certain this is actually what she said, however, I already believe the person who asked for me, but just to be able to say it is from the horses mouth, I intend to veryify all of this through Marilyn).... in the meantime I am sharing what I can from the person who asked her for me. 

I asked for the phone number the 911 call was called from and the date, so jessstar could try to find the report.  what I was told as an answer to these questions was:

911 was called in the summer of 2008.  Marilyn called 3-4 times to the police.  She called cps once on Melissa Baum.  This had nothing to do with Josh Baum.  Marilyn says she does not know if a report was made or not.  She called them and she does not know what they did concerning making a report, but she "assumes" there is an incident report because she called them.  So there very well might not be a report at all. 

Evidently, nothing happened about all of these calls because lindsey was still living at home with her mother.  So whatever it was which marilyn called about did not seem important enough to the police to do anything about it. 

Now I do know a couple of things marilyn called about, but I am not going to post that, she can post it somewhere if she chooses to do so, which it seems as though she has no qualms about posting about Melissa or Josh.

If marilyn is telling the truth about what she felt was wrong enough that she needed to call the police and cps, then the question is, was it really happening?  Well, evidently the police did not think it anything that warranted lindsey being taken out of the home or for her mother to be  in trouble etc;  so here is what you have to decided to believe.  Was there really anything that bad going on.  Did the police do their job in looking at the accusations by marilyn?  Was marilyn just mad at MB and josh and was calling about things that were not true or blown out of proportion?  Was lindsey telling marilyn things and marilyn thought they were worse than they were?

see we don't KNOW, all I know is what marilyn is saying and that she does not know if there is a police report and also that the police did nothing about anything.  so what does that tell us?  It tells us either the police did not do their job and neither did cps, or... there is nothing bad going on to warrant any action by the police or cps. 

I also have info from another source other than marilyn about one of these incidents where there is a report.  And it had nothing at all to do with josh baum, and it was nothing that anyone got in trouble for nor did it warrant taking lindsey out of the home etc.  And from the extent of what I have been told actually happened, it was something that probably 80% or 90% of people would have done under the circumstances, IF the circumstances are such that I have been told.  However, am I told the truth?  I believe I was, as the police did not think this was out of line to do and no actionns were taken about it. 

Now why is marilyn saying all these horrible things were going on, I don't know.  She probably believes they were.  Obviously the police do not believe they were, or both the police and cps just did not care.  who really knows. 

as for the white car incident, supposedly marilyn is saying this happened a week before lindsey disappeared, however, marilyn HEARD about it, she did not KNOW about it.  Marilyn was not even living in McCleary at this time, she still does not live in McCleary.  She does have a lot of friends there and she does HEAR things. 

Now this is something I have no idea what this is about, but love4ever has dug up a court record for ML for assault in the summer of 2008.  I have no idea what this is about, but we can see that ML also assaults people.  So who do we believe here? 

I really don't know.  I do know what the report is about, and it has absolutely NOTHING AT ALL to do with josh baum.   


DD

What if Lindsey is telling the truth regarding her brother's abuse?  What if mlachester is revealing exactly how the incident unfolded?

Janet



<snipped>

... but for your peace of mind, the police did check out josh... so as you keep saying about a free pass, he did NOT get one.  he was looked at.

<snipped> 


 ::MonkeyShocked::

Link please.

DD ... I have not read one quote from Kara, Melissa or Sheriff Scott that Josh Baum was considered a person of interest in the process of elimination in the investigation and ...  was interrogated accordingly.

One quote in regards to a police interrogation or ... one quote that reveals that Josh Baum went home per the family friend's instructions ... one quote that reveals that this young man was with his Mom when his sister left the Kampen/Williams residence ... will shut this wannabe detective up in regards to Josh Baum.

KaraK would not answer me directly in regards to whether Josh Baum went straight home as instructed following the argument with his sister.

Janet



I have no link, and if you need links for everything I state, then you can disregard 90% of what I say, because I am talking to people outright, they are not posting this stuff.  just like I don't have a link for what the detective told me either.  Neither does lachester have links, but her own posts prove she has lied.  At least my posts don't prove I am lying LOL...

but if you want to believe ML, then believe this, the cops checked out josh, and just so you will know... that info came from ML... so if you want to believe her, believe that too, you can't pick and choose which parts of her stories you wish to believe.  either believe her or don't.  she is the one who states the police checked out josh baum and the places he hangs out.  now I do believe that part because I don't believe she would like about anything that makes josh look guilty, as she is saying she believes melissa and josh had something to do with lindsey's disappearance. 

you can believe what you like, as anyone else can believe what they like.  If you need links from me to believe me, then just skip over my posts.  I post everything to document when there are records, when I give my own opinion I state it is just that ... opinion... when I say something from the "local rumor mill" I state that also. 

ML is part of that local rumor mill.  and believe me she is a HUGE part of that local rumor mill.  but she is not the only part of the local rumor mill, however, she knows a lot of the ones who are, and all this stuff is going around and around and around, and several people are outright lying.  so are they also lying to the police? 

again ML states someone else was living at kara's.  that is something else no one knows about.  oh you have to hear this story!  LOL  but kara has never even heard of anyone with this person's name.  so who is lying here?  ml or kara.  if ml told the police this person was living at kara's and was there the night lindsey disappeared, don't you think the police would go ask kara about this person.  especially when they got a broken rib at kara's house that night ACCORDING TO MARILYN???

see what I am saying, I hear a lot more than what I say,  one of these people are lying their butts off.  it will all come out in the wash.  the police are not going to say these things to the public, there are no articles about all this stuff, there are no links.  but they are still going on nonetheless.  And one of these two are lying their butts off.  but if there was another person at kara's that night, who might I add marily states actually lived at kara's, and if they ended up with a broken rib that night trying to crawl through the window etc, AS MARILYN STATES, then the police should know about that.  funny though, kara never ever even heard of this person, let alone that they lived with her and was crawling through her window and ended up with a broken rib. 

now see what is going on behind the scenes?  no wonder people in mccleary won't help search for lindsey, heck they probably think kara, melissa, or josh killed her and so why help them look for her. 

I'll tell you what, if marilyn is causing all this crap she needs her butt kicked.  on the other hand if she is telling the truth, (which we can prove some of it is lies), then they better go find the guy who lived at kara's house with the broken rib.  in fact I will just email that over to them today.  they can put an end to all this crap. 


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3 7/28/09 -
Post by: Rob on August 08, 2009, 01:55:07 PM
I have to wonder if Marilyn's son was interviewed - after-all she admits he is a friend and what were his whereabouts for this evening in question. 


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3 7/28/09 -
Post by: no rose colored glasses on August 08, 2009, 01:57:35 PM
DD you said  now see what is going on behind the scenes?  no wonder people in mccleary won't help search for lindsey, heck they probably think kara, melissa, or josh killed her and so why help them look for her. 
This is what I think is going on, for whatever reasons, people don't like this family or so it seems. Do you think the dog getting out and Marilyn's fine that she had to pay started a feud?


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3 7/28/09 -
Post by: love4ever on August 08, 2009, 02:19:37 PM
love4ever before I go back to the previous page just wanted to say thanks to you also for the info. Why are people's statements changing. One other thing about the dog, could it have been Lindsey's mom who called about the dog that got loose? That could sure start a feud  ::MonkeyEek:: I've seen that happen in my own neighborhood  ::MonkeyNoNo::

You are welcome, in any instance where a matter of life or death is concerned, all feuds should ethically be dismissed by all persons involved. This should be an innate behavior amongst the individuals who truly care for the missing person. An immoral act of selfishness because one (Mlachester) wishes to be holier than thou.

The two personas, MBaum & MLachester look as if MBaum is mostly intimidated by Mlachester who is consistantly pointing the finger@ MBaum. They both have children who have been in trouble with the law. The thing is, the families environments, in which these children belong are profoundly different.

My own opinion of course, I see MLachester as a lady who has a dissonance issue in which she disregards her own behavior, and her childrens, yet is cleary quick to make claim of someone elses.

My own opinion, MBaum seems to regress her feelings when she is demeaned by another, maybe a self esteem issue, maybe not. It just seems as if she is intimidated by MLachester.

I could go on and on, but the importance is of Lindsey and MLachester shows no signs of compassion in the efforts to find Lindsey, she seems to be more in a vindictive mode of operation in which her focus is directed to MBaum and Josh, again an intimidation tactic.

~Love~


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3 7/28/09 -
Post by: no rose colored glasses on August 08, 2009, 02:24:34 PM
love4ever before I go back to the previous page just wanted to say thanks to you also for the info. Why are people's statements changing. One other thing about the dog, could it have been Lindsey's mom who called about the dog that got loose? That could sure start a feud  ::MonkeyEek:: I've seen that happen in my own neighborhood  ::MonkeyNoNo::

You are welcome, in any instance where a matter of life or death is concerned, all feuds should ethically be dismissed by all persons involved. This should be an innate behavior amongst the individuals who truly care for the missing person. An immoral act of selfishness because one (Mlachester) wishes to be holier than thou.

The two personas, MBaum & MLachester look as if MBaum is mostly intimidated by Mlachester who is consistantly pointing the finger@ MBaum. They both have children who have been in trouble with the law. The thing is, the families environments, in which these children belong are profoundly different.

My own opinion of course, I see MLachester as a lady who has a dissonance issue in which she disregards her own behavior, and her childrens, yet is cleary quick to make claim of someone elses.

My own opinion, MBaum seems to regress her feelings when she is demeaned by another, maybe a self esteem issue, maybe not. It just seems as if she is intimidated by MLachester.

I could go on and on, but the importance is of Lindsey and MLachester shows no signs of compassion in the efforts to find Lindsey, she seems to be more in a vindictive mode of operation in which her focus is directed to MBaum and Josh, again an intimidation tactic.

~Love~
It sure sounds that way. I'm really wondering the true reason why MLachester dislikes Melissa and Josh so. Something happened that's for sure, maybe MBaum looked at her the wrong way one day, who knows, could be something as lame as that.


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3 7/28/09 -
Post by: love4ever on August 08, 2009, 02:38:38 PM
love4ever before I go back to the previous page just wanted to say thanks to you also for the info. Why are people's statements changing. One other thing about the dog, could it have been Lindsey's mom who called about the dog that got loose? That could sure start a feud  ::MonkeyEek:: I've seen that happen in my own neighborhood  ::MonkeyNoNo::

You are welcome, in any instance where a matter of life or death is concerned, all feuds should ethically be dismissed by all persons involved. This should be an innate behavior amongst the individuals who truly care for the missing person. An immoral act of selfishness because one (Mlachester) wishes to be holier than thou.

The two personas, MBaum & MLachester look as if MBaum is mostly intimidated by Mlachester who is consistantly pointing the finger@ MBaum. They both have children who have been in trouble with the law. The thing is, the families environments, in which these children belong are profoundly different.

My own opinion of course, I see MLachester as a lady who has a dissonance issue in which she disregards her own behavior, and her childrens, yet is cleary quick to make claim of someone elses.

My own opinion, MBaum seems to regress her feelings when she is demeaned by another, maybe a self esteem issue, maybe not. It just seems as if she is intimidated by MLachester.

I could go on and on, but the importance is of Lindsey and MLachester shows no signs of compassion in the efforts to find Lindsey, she seems to be more in a vindictive mode of operation in which her focus is directed to MBaum and Josh, again an intimidation tactic.

~Love~
It sure sounds that way. I'm really wondering the true reason why MLachester dislikes Melissa and Josh so. Something happened that's for sure, maybe MBaum looked at her the wrong way one day, who knows, could be something as lame as that.

Ever since I have been able to understand this type of behavior, it has disgusted me. We have someone who uses their power of intimidation by the culture in which they come from, and then we have a person who is trying to make it in everyday life struggles.

If something did happen between these two families it seems to be that one is consistent in intimidation, because one plays on the weakness of another. This type of personality is empowered by the thought of continuous harassment towards a person to make themselves feel good. Again, an act of dissonance of their own families behavior.


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3 7/28/09 -
Post by: doubledecker on August 08, 2009, 02:44:44 PM
DD you said  now see what is going on behind the scenes?  no wonder people in mccleary won't help search for lindsey, heck they probably think kara, melissa, or josh killed her and so why help them look for her. 
This is what I think is going on, for whatever reasons, people don't like this family or so it seems. Do you think the dog getting out and Marilyn's fine that she had to pay started a feud?

I really don't know anything whatsoever about the dog other than the post by ML.  I don't know what caused the feuding other than Kara said it was over josh and ML's son getting into it.  I don't know one thing about these two things other that what everyone has read from kara or Ml's posts. 

what I do know, is marilyn obviously thinks lindsey was abused, or she keeps saying she was and that she was trying to help her.  one of the things ml said, passed on to me from her friend I have not posted as if it is not true it really throws people off on another wild goose chase but if it true, and no authorities acted upon it you really have to wonder why.  either police and cps should be investigated for not doing something or marilyn is lying or she really believes what she is saying and she's nuts.  and because of all these allegations again melissa and josh, to the point she is trying to tell people they were doing horrible physical abuse to lindsey to the point is showed up on her, then you have to wonder if the whole town is hearing this.  if the town believes melissa and josh or kara is responsible, because of all these rumors/lies etc,(IF that is what they are) then I can see why no one will help kara or melissa look for lindsey, who is going to help the very people they believe did this?  no one.  and if you have a well known resident telling everyone this stuff, what are they to believe?  just like people on the board believe marilyn and start looking at melissa and josh. 

I don't know what the real problem here is but I know at least some of it is lies, you can compare the statements and it proves there are lies... so which are lies and which aren't?  and this is going on day after day after day. 

so we have an 11 yr old girl missing and because of all the crap no one is looking for her, that is what I really think.  because people do not like kara or melissa or josh, and because of all the BS going on through a tiny little gossipy town, people will not help.  that really sucks.  it pisses me off to no end.  it has also led me on a ton of wild goose chases when I could have been researching the things I was working on to begin with, rather than stopping to go follow another bunch of lying bs. 

I'm mad!  I'm mad because lindsey is still out there somewhere and people in that town are full of crap.  grrr, I have to go, I;m getting out of hand, and I don't like getting like that, but these lying people are on my last nerve.  they better hope the heck they are really telling the truth, because at some point I am going to blow up about this.  grrr.


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3 7/28/09 -
Post by: doubledecker on August 08, 2009, 02:45:22 PM
jessstar, you have email with phone number and etc.


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3 7/28/09 -
Post by: love4ever on August 08, 2009, 02:48:05 PM
Another thing, if one continuously coerced and played on Lindseys feelings, this is morally wrong in concerns with a child's intellectual maturity, or any reason for that matter. Furthermore, if one uses a child to retaliate against someone they dislike, I find literal disgust in this sort of behavior.

This is my own emphasis, just something that asses from the limited information I have read. I do not know of the matter between these two families, personally. The situation between these two families could be the exact opposite of that in which I have pondered.

~Love~



Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3 7/28/09 -
Post by: no rose colored glasses on August 08, 2009, 02:53:03 PM
so we have an 11 yr old girl missing and because of all the crap no one is looking for her, that is what I really think.  because people do not like kara or melissa or josh, and because of all the BS going on through a tiny little gossipy town, people will not help.       (Sad part is I know all about this kind of behavior, all too well what can happen in a tiny gossipy town. This is all very frustrating, and of course little Lindsey is the one suffering from this behavior. I have no idea from reading all of this who is telling the truth, but I'm sure LE has checked if there was any abuse inside Lindsey's home. One thing I can see is for whatever reason, gossip or whatever the Baum family doesn't seem to be well liked and perhaps Kara's family also, maybe because they are outsiders?)


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3 7/28/09 -
Post by: no rose colored glasses on August 08, 2009, 02:54:31 PM
Another thing, if one continuously coerced and played on Lindseys feelings, this is morally wrong in concerns with a child's intellectual maturity, or any reason for that matter. Furthermore, if one uses a child to retaliate against someone they dislike, I find literal disgust in this sort of behavior.

This is my own emphasis, just something that asses from the limited information I have read. I do not know of the matter between these two families, personally. The situation between these two families could be the exact opposite of that in which I have pondered.

~Love~


She could have been playing on Lindsey's feelings, even giving her things that perhaps her mom couldn't afford.


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3 7/28/09 -
Post by: love4ever on August 08, 2009, 03:01:07 PM
Another thing, if one continuously coerced and played on Lindseys feelings, this is morally wrong in concerns with a child's intellectual maturity, or any reason for that matter. Furthermore, if one uses a child to retaliate against someone they dislike, I find literal disgust in this sort of behavior.

This is my own emphasis, just something that asses from the limited information I have read. I do not know of the matter between these two families, personally. The situation between these two families could be the exact opposite of that in which I have pondered.

~Love~


She could have been playing on Lindsey's feelings, even giving her things that perhaps her mom couldn't afford.

She also could have played on Lindseys feelings to use against Lindseys mother, this would be a very manipulative behavior by a person unto a child.

However, I believe we should listen to children if they choose to confide in us, but coercing a child to say things in extremely different.


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3 7/28/09 -
Post by: love4ever on August 08, 2009, 03:04:10 PM
Anyways, back to the quest of finding precious Lindsey Baum...


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3 7/28/09 -
Post by: doubledecker on August 08, 2009, 03:06:58 PM
so we have an 11 yr old girl missing and because of all the crap no one is looking for her, that is what I really think.  because people do not like kara or melissa or josh, and because of all the BS going on through a tiny little gossipy town, people will not help.       (Sad part is I know all about this kind of behavior, all too well what can happen in a tiny gossipy town. This is all very frustrating, and of course little Lindsey is the one suffering from this behavior. I have no idea from reading all of this who is telling the truth, but I'm sure LE has checked if there was any abuse inside Lindsey's home. One thing I can see is for whatever reason, gossip or whatever the Baum family doesn't seem to be well liked and perhaps Kara's family also, maybe because they are outsiders?)

I know what tiny little towns are like as well, I have lived in several and lived in them for many years.  it's like this.  someone moves in and crap starts if you get on one of the long time locals bad side.  you don't even have to do anything, all you need is one loudmouth local who can't stand to see someone have or do something they can't etc, and it starts.  The long time local gossips crap throughout the whole town, are believed or even if not believed the other locals jump on the bully wagon and the new person gets heck from there on out.  it's like the little clique at school who goes around bullying all the newer or weaker kids.  kara has lived there 6 months, melissa 2 yrs.  like marilyn states, she (marilyn) is well known, everyone knows who she is.  no one really knows kara and her family.  they probably don't know anything about melissa baum or josh other than josh got into it with marilyns son and he does not get along with other kids, so here comes the locals and does not like these two newer families.  so the crap starts.  and now there is something huge to rag the families about, oh they must have killed their daughter/sister, don't help them they did it, so no one helps. 

you really can't believe how the locals are treating these two families over this. 
I have heard(from people inside the case) what the locals are doing and how they are acting and treating kara and melissa etc.  it's bs... these people better realize that someone out there has lindsey and they could have their kid next.  people won't say anything against certain people, I've already been told that too.  no one will get their loved one of friends in trouble they say.  wow!  so not only point fingers at people just because you don't like them, but also don't say anything about others just because you are related or know them.  then you have all the druggies who refuse to tell the police what they know as well.  Yes, I have been told that also. 

so mccleary is full of people who need to wake up... who cares who they like etc, lindsey is a child who needs to be found and no one should get away with doing something to a child.  IF for some reason melissa baum or josh is involved, then people who really do know something need to tell the police and the police need to go check.  I am sure they have.  but all this saying blah blah blah and then when someone goes to check it out the stories keep changing, what the heck is that about?  the stories, if they are true, should not be changing.  no wonder some people say the police are rude to them, I can see why.  they were not rude to me at all, they were exceptionally nice.  I expected them to be rude, I didn't even want to contact them at all, but I could not get anyone else to because they did not have the info I had etc, and it was confusing unless you understood how it all took place, so I did it.  and all these people with all their stories need to tell the police or shut the heck up.  grrr, and if they wish to tell me anythig more, they better quit lying because at this point I don't believe them


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3 7/28/09 -
Post by: love4ever on August 08, 2009, 03:13:39 PM
Ditto, DD :smt060 :smt060


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3 7/28/09 -
Post by: doubledecker on August 08, 2009, 03:17:56 PM
I'm going.  you know where to find me if you need me or whatever, at this point I don't need to be here.  I'm blowing a fuse and I don't need to do this.  sorry for the ranting, but I am so tired of all these dang lies.  we spend a lot of time and effort trying to help, not that we can most of the time, but every once in awhile one of us do come across something that will help.  I know I am not the only one who spends hours and hours, and waking up in the middle of the night trying to think of something that might help lead somewhere.  going through all these docs and paying for pay sites, etc.  We do this why?  because we care about the missing person.  We don't get paid, in fact if people are like me it takes away from the hours we might get money for ourselves... we do this because we care, no other reason. 

and then to have people come and tell you lies and send you on wild goose chases for whatever reason, pisses me off to no end.  it wastes our time that we could be possibly finding something that might actually help someone.  now I will go back and see what I was working on when all these people started lying to me; what was it that they wanted me to stop looking at?  hmmm.... might be interesting to find out...

see all of you later, I need to get back to something I am working on.  again sorry to get so grrr.  I only came here to give jessstar the phone number and ended up getting mad because of this whole marilyn pointing fingers crap again. 


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3 7/28/09 -
Post by: no rose colored glasses on August 08, 2009, 03:30:49 PM
DD  ::MonkeyAngel::  I for one don't blame you at all for being angry, and want to thank-you again for what you are doing. The behavior coming from this town is very upsetting, I have asked and asked and don't get an answer. Are the towns people pointing fingers at one another or basically is it finger pointing just at Kara, Josh and Melissa? Are the townspeople watching their kids better, are they being more cautious, or are they letting them unsupervised because the fingers are being pointed at Kara, Josh and Melissa. And are LE telling the people in town to watch your children closer because we have a kidnapper out there?


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3 7/28/09 -
Post by: no rose colored glasses on August 08, 2009, 03:32:05 PM
One question, is this Marilyn rich, or much better off then most of the folks in town?


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3 7/28/09 -
Post by: love4ever on August 08, 2009, 03:41:02 PM
One question, is this Marilyn rich, or much better off then most of the folks in town?

File No.: 7427.20505 Grantors: Northwest Trustee Services, Inc. National City Bank Grantee: Festus Lachester III and Marilyn A. Lachester, husband and wife Tax Parcel ID No.: 060501101500 Abbreviated Legal: Lt 15 Blk 11 McCleary Notice of Trustee's Sale Pursuant to the Revised Code of Washington 61.24, et seq. I[/color]. On December 19, 2008, at 10:00 a.m. inside the main lobby of the Grays Harbor County Courthouse, 102 West Broadway in the City of Montesano, State of Washington, the undersigned Trustee (subject to any conditions imposed by the Trustee) will sell at public auction to the highest and best bidder, payable at time of sale, the following described real property "Property", situated in the County(ies) of Grays Harbor, State of Washington: Lot 15, Block 11, Plat of McCleary, as per Plat recorded in Volume 4 of Plats, Page 10, Records of Grays Harbor County; Situate in the County of Grays Harbor, State of Washington. Commonly known as: 343 South 1st Street McCleary, WA 98557 which is subject to that certain Deed of Trust dated 11/09/04, recorded on 11/18/04, under Auditor's File No. 2004-11180061, records of Grays Harbor County, Washington, from Festus Lachester III and Marilyn A. Lachester, husband and wife, as Grantor, to Pacific Title Co., as Trustee, to secure an obligation "Obligation" in favor of First Franklin Financial Corporation, as Beneficiary, the beneficial interest in which was assigned by First Franklin Financial Corporation to National City Home Loan Services Inc. nka National City Bank, under an Assignment/Successive Assignments recorded under Auditor's File No. 2006-11030071. *The Tax Parcel ID number and Abbreviated Legal Description are provided solely to comply with the recording statutes and are not intended to supplement, amend or supersede the Property's full legal description provided herein. II. No action commenced by the Beneficiary of the Deed of Trust is now pending to seek satisfaction of the Obligation in any Court by reason of the Grantor's or Borrower's default on the Obligation. III. The Beneficiary alleges default of the Deed of Trust for failure to pay the following amounts now in arrears and/or other defaults: Amount due to reinstate by 09/18/2008 Monthly Payments $9,301.37 Late Charges $361.27 Lender's Fees & Costs $5,191.88 Total Arrearage $14,854.52 Trustee's Expenses (Itemization) Trustee's Fee $450.00 Total Costs $450.00 Total Amount Due: $15,304.52 Other known defaults as follows: IV. The sum owing on the Obligation is: Principal Balance of $63,602.65, together with interest as provided in the note or other instrument evidencing the Obligation from 08/01/07, and such other costs and fees as are due under the Obligation, and as are provided by statute. V. The Property will be sold to satisfy the expense of sale and the Obligation as provided by statute. The sale will be made without representation or warranty, express or implied regarding title, possession, encumbrances or condition of the Property on December 19, 2008. The default(s) referred to in paragraph III, together with any subsequent payments, late charges, advances costs and fees thereafter due, must be cured by 12/08/08 (11 days before the sale date), to cause a discontinuance of the sale. The sale will be discontinued and terminated if at any time before the close of the Trustee's business on 12/08/08 (11 days before the sale date), the default(s) as set forth in paragraph III, together with any subsequent payments, late charges, advances, costs and fees thereafter due, is/are cured and the Trustee's fees and costs are paid. The sale may be terminated any time after 12/08/08 (11 days before the sale date), and before the sale by the Borrower, Grantor, any Guarantor or the holder of any recorded junior lien or encumbrance paying the entire balance of principal and interest secured by the Deed of Trust, plus costs, fees, and advances, if any made pursuant to the terms of the obligation and/or Deed of Trust. VI. A written notice of default was transmitted by the Beneficiary or Trustee to the Borrower and Grantor at the following address(es): NAME AND ADDRESS Festus Lachester III 343 South 1st Street McCleary, WA 98557 Marilyn A. Lachester 343 South 1st Street McCleary, WA 98557Festus Lachester III 904 West Simpson #6 McCleary, WA 98557 Marilyn A. Lachester 904 West Simpson #6 McCleary, WA 98557 ***by both first class and either certified mail, return receipt requested on 01/29/08, proof of which is in the possession of the Trustee; and on 01/30/08 Grantor and Borrower were personally served with said written notice of default or the written notice of default was posted on a conspicuous place on the real property described in paragraph I above, and the Trustee has possession of proof of such service or posting. VII. The Trustee, whose name and address are set forth below, will provide in writing to anyone requesting it a statement of all foreclosure costs and trustee's fees due at any time prior to the sale. VIII. The effect of the sale will be to deprive the Grantor and all those who hold by, through or under the Grantor of all their right, title and interest in the Property. IX. Anyone having any objection to the sale on any grounds whatsoever will be afforded an opportunity to be heard as to those objections if they bring a lawsuit to restrain the sale pursuant to RCW 61.24.130. Failure to bring such a lawsuit may result in a waiver of any proper grounds for invalidating the Trustee's sale. X. NOTICE TO OCCUPANTS OR TENANTS - The purchaser at the Trustee's Sale is entitled to possession of the property on the 20th day following the sale, as against the Grantor under the Deed of Trust (the owner) and anyone having an interest junior to the deed of trust, including occupants and tenants. After the 20th day following the sale the purchaser has the right to evict occupants and tenants by summary proceedings under the unlawful detainer act, Chapter 59.12 RCW. The trustee's rules of auction may be accessed at http://www.northwesttrustee.com and are incorporated by this reference. You may also access sale status at http://www.northwesttrustee.com and http://www.USA-Foreclosure.com. EFFECTIVE: 09/18/2008 Northwest Trustee Services, Inc., Trustee Authorized Signature P.O. BOX 997 Bellevue, WA 98009-0997 Contact: Heather L. Smith (425) 586-1900. (TS# 7427.20505) 1002.83891-FEI
11/20, 12/11; 2t

http://**/archives/20nov08/legals1.html


I wouldn't think so...but never know


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3 7/28/09 -
Post by: love4ever on August 08, 2009, 03:47:12 PM
Have a nice day ~Love~


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3 7/28/09 -
Post by: no rose colored glasses on August 08, 2009, 04:18:04 PM
Have a nice day ~Love~
Thank-you, and you have a nice day also.


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3 7/28/09 -
Post by: love4ever on August 08, 2009, 05:20:49 PM
This address gets me...904 West Simpson #6 McCleary, WA 98557...since I have no sense of geographical direction would this be going up the hill on 6th from Maple st?

And when did the lachester's live at this address?


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3 7/28/09 -
Post by: sunshine12 on August 08, 2009, 06:34:42 PM
just wanted to say that there's no way we'll ever have confirmation of a cps report being made. it's possible mlachester called but if the allegations she made did not meet the requirements of hte child protective services law, a caseworker may not have repsponded to the home.  there is still a record of the call at the agency b/c they have to keep records of all of the calls, however we won't get that information unless it were to come out in a trial of somesort..even then we might not ever know.


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3 7/28/09 -
Post by: Tamikosmom on August 08, 2009, 06:38:12 PM
Think about it.

There was a confirmed sighting of Lindsey at 5th on Maple at 9:30 PM just two blocks from the Baum residence.  This would coincide with Kara Kampen and Scott Williams' time frame in regards to when Lindsey left their residence.

Considering Melissa Baum and Scott Williams passed a polygraph ... it can be assumed that neither participated in an action that resulted the disappearances of Lindsey or ... at that time possessed any knowledge encompassing what happened.

The above would imply that something happened to Lindsey in that two block stretched.

Inquiring minds want to know.  Did Josh Baum returned home as instructed following the argument with his sister?  Was he home with Mom between 9:15 PM and 9:30 PM?

Janet

++++++

KOMO News – July 2, 2009

The missing girl's mother, who wanted avoid becoming the center of the investigation, voluntarily took a polygraph test. The father of the girl's best friend, Scott Williams, also volunteered to take the test.

"At their requests polygraphs were given to them. They passed those polygraphs. We're comfortable with the information they've shared with us and comfortable with the timeline they've explained," said Grays Harbor County Undersheriff Rick Scott.

http://www.komonews.com/news/49651607.html


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3 7/28/09 -
Post by: Tracygirl on August 08, 2009, 06:52:14 PM
This address gets me...904 West Simpson #6 McCleary, WA 98557...since I have no sense of geographical direction would this be going up the hill on 6th from Maple st?

And when did the lachester's live at this address?

Do we know if the home that was forclosed has been re-sold or sits vacant?



Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3 7/28/09 -
Post by: Tamikosmom on August 08, 2009, 06:55:20 PM
DD'S SOURCE - MLACHESTER'S FRIEND


Is DD in contact with mlachester?

Janet

I am in contact with a good friend of marilyn's family and this person ask Marilyn specifically the questions I asked her to ask.  Marilyn also told her that I can talk with her(marilyn) personally and I intend on getting ahold of Marilyn herself TODAY.  This was Marilyn's suggestion as I am told through the family friend.  I did not wish to bother marilyn but because I have been invited by her to talk with her, I will.

BUMPED


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3 7/28/09 -
Post by: Tamikosmom on August 08, 2009, 07:02:54 PM
Think about it.

There was a confirmed sighting of Lindsey at 5th on Maple at 9:30 PM just two blocks from the Baum residence.  This would coincide with Kara Kampen and Scott Williams' time frame in regards to when Lindsey left their residence.

Considering Melissa Baum and Scott Williams passed a polygraph ... it can be assumed that neither participated in an action that resulted the disappearances of Lindsey or ... at that time possessed any knowledge encompassing what happened.

The above would imply that something happened to Lindsey in that two block stretched.

Inquiring minds want to know.  Did Josh Baum returned home as instructed following the argument with his sister?  Was he home with Mom between 9:15 PM and 9:30 PM?

Janet

++++++

KOMO News – July 2, 2009

The missing girl's mother, who wanted avoid becoming the center of the investigation, voluntarily took a polygraph test. The father of the girl's best friend, Scott Williams, also volunteered to take the test.

"At their requests polygraphs were given to them. They passed those polygraphs. We're comfortable with the information they've shared with us and comfortable with the timeline they've explained," said Grays Harbor County Undersheriff Rick Scott.

http://www.komonews.com/news/49651607.html


If my above two questions involving Lindsey's brother are answered ... Melissa Baum, Scott Willaims and Josh Baum ... in the process of elimination ... can all be eliminated as persons of interest.

Simple.

Janet


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3 7/28/09 -
Post by: no rose colored glasses on August 08, 2009, 07:21:06 PM
I'm interested if there was another person at Kara's house or not  ::MonkeyEek::


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3 7/28/09 -
Post by: Tamikosmom on August 08, 2009, 07:32:01 PM
I'm interested if there was another person at Kara's house or not  ::MonkeyEek::



Quote from: sunshine12 on July 05, 2009, 06:42:50 PM

i also am curious as to who exactly was in the kampen home the night that lindsey disappeared?


KaraK
Re: Lindsey Baum, 10y missing from McCleary, WA 6/26/09
« Reply #1163 on: July 05, 2009, 06:52:39 PM »


My house - Myself, Scott and my 4 kids.

http://scaredmonkeys.net/index.php?topic=5541.msg865334;topicseen#msg865334





Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3 7/28/09 -
Post by: A_News_Junkie_Monkey on August 08, 2009, 07:33:01 PM
------------------> SNIP

KOMO News – July 2, 2009

The missing girl's mother, who wanted avoid becoming the center of the investigation, voluntarily took a polygraph test. The father of the girl's best friend, Scott Williams, also volunteered to take the test.

"At their requests polygraphs were given to them. They passed those polygraphs. We're comfortable with the information they've shared with us and comfortable with the timeline they've explained," said Grays Harbor County Undersheriff Rick Scott.

http://www.komonews.com/news/49651607.html

Playing devil's advocate or just thinking outside the box.............
http://www.fas.org/sgp/othergov/polygraph/ota/validity.html
How skilled is the LE force of 3 in McCleary?  Just asking.......

Plus, I sure wish I had seen a mother's pain from M. 
I can't help but be haunted and left wondering despite reports about even the mom.  I question her, the adults (esp those involved in rumor mill crap that is hurting efforts) and basically everyone else before Josh or any child.  IMHO a child could not have done this and got by with it this long unless one of the aforementioned was involved. 
Don't throw stones at me for thinking outside the box - only bananas! LOL


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3 7/28/09 -
Post by: love4ever on August 08, 2009, 07:33:12 PM
Think about it.

There was a confirmed sighting of Lindsey at 5th on Maple at 9:30 PM just two blocks from the Baum residence.  This would coincide with Kara Kampen and Scott Williams' time frame in regards to when Lindsey left their residence.

Considering Melissa Baum and Scott Williams passed a polygraph ... it can be assumed that neither participated in an action that resulted the disappearances of Lindsey or ... at that time possessed any knowledge encompassing what happened.

The above would imply that something happened to Lindsey in that two block stretched.

Inquiring minds want to know.  Did Josh Baum returned home as instructed following the argument with his sister?  Was he home with Mom between 9:15 PM and 9:30 PM?

Janet

++++++

KOMO News – July 2, 2009

The missing girl's mother, who wanted avoid becoming the center of the investigation, voluntarily took a polygraph test. The father of the girl's best friend, Scott Williams, also volunteered to take the test.

"At their requests polygraphs were given to them. They passed those polygraphs. We're comfortable with the information they've shared with us and comfortable with the timeline they've explained," said Grays Harbor County Undersheriff Rick Scott.

http://www.komonews.com/news/49651607.html


If my above two questions involving Lindsey's brother are answered ... Melissa Baum, Scott Willaims and Josh Baum ... in the process of elimination ... can all be eliminated as persons of interest.

Simple.

Janet



Is this information available to the public?

If so maybe you can contact them and ask if Josh was home..This is a question that needs to be asked of them because their is no talk of it in the media.  


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3 7/28/09 -
Post by: love4ever on August 08, 2009, 07:35:31 PM
or at least i haven't seen any, a just reason for not being able to research


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3 7/28/09 -
Post by: sunshine12 on August 08, 2009, 07:38:04 PM
I'm interested if there was another person at Kara's house or not  ::MonkeyEek::

so am i... i thought i read somewhere when lindsey first went missing that there was but i need to go find that information...

my thing is...would this be the type of question asked during a polygraph test?

either way, i agree that either mlachester or karak are lying and whoever it is it's a sin.


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3 7/28/09 -
Post by: AZSunny on August 08, 2009, 07:43:41 PM
Think about it.

There was a confirmed sighting of Lindsey at 5th on Maple at 9:30 PM just two blocks from the Baum residence.  This would coincide with Kara Kampen and Scott Williams' time frame in regards to when Lindsey left their residence.

Considering Melissa Baum and Scott Williams passed a polygraph ... it can be assumed that neither participated in an action that resulted the disappearances of Lindsey or ... at that time possessed any knowledge encompassing what happened.

The above would imply that something happened to Lindsey in that two block stretched.

Inquiring minds want to know.  Did Josh Baum returned home as instructed following the argument with his sister?  Was he home with Mom between 9:15 PM and 9:30 PM?

Janet

++++++

KOMO News – July 2, 2009

The missing girl's mother, who wanted avoid becoming the center of the investigation, voluntarily took a polygraph test. The father of the girl's best friend, Scott Williams, also volunteered to take the test.

"At their requests polygraphs were given to them. They passed those polygraphs. We're comfortable with the information they've shared with us and comfortable with the timeline they've explained," said Grays Harbor County Undersheriff Rick Scott.

http://www.komonews.com/news/49651607.html


If my above two questions involving Lindsey's brother are answered ... Melissa Baum, Scott Willaims and Josh Baum ... in the process of elimination ... can all be eliminated as persons of interest.

Simple.

Janet


Janet,  I don't know who, beyond the police themselves can provide this information to you.  Why don't you contact them with your question? Or send them an email?  Clearly we are not going to be able to provide a link to you that will answer these questions for you. I am afraid that you are so convinced that this is what happened, that you may be  overlooking more obvious evidence that may lead in a totally different direction, or worse causing someone else to do so. 


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3 7/28/09 -
Post by: Sister on August 08, 2009, 07:47:34 PM
Think about it.


Is there a particular reason you frequently tell us to "think about it"?  That is exactly what all of us have been doing - we do think about it.  Just curious.


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3 7/28/09 -
Post by: love4ever on August 08, 2009, 07:55:57 PM
Think about it.


Is there a particular reason you frequently tell us to "think about it"?  That is exactly what all of us have been doing - we do think about it.  Just curious.


I think about a hundreds ways to research and work with what I can, if i can not find information on a person or location that is relevant, I move on to a place in research in which I can help. It drives me crazy, but when I get to a place in research where I can go no further, I move on. Everyday, I hope there is something new to guide us into further research, but mostly everyday i wish Lindsey would come home.


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3 7/28/09 -
Post by: Tamikosmom on August 08, 2009, 07:57:47 PM
------------------> SNIP

KOMO News – July 2, 2009

The missing girl's mother, who wanted avoid becoming the center of the investigation, voluntarily took a polygraph test. The father of the girl's best friend, Scott Williams, also volunteered to take the test.

"At their requests polygraphs were given to them. They passed those polygraphs. We're comfortable with the information they've shared with us and comfortable with the timeline they've explained," said Grays Harbor County Undersheriff Rick Scott.

http://www.komonews.com/news/49651607.html

Playing devil's advocate or just thinking outside the box.............
http://www.fas.org/sgp/othergov/polygraph/ota/validity.html
How skilled is the LE force of 3 in McCleary?  Just asking.......

Plus, I sure wish I had seen a mother's pain from M. 
I can't help but be haunted and left wondering despite reports about even the mom.  I question her, the adults (esp those involved in rumor mill crap that is hurting efforts) and basically everyone else before Josh or any child.  IMHO a child could not have done this and got by with it this long unless one of the aforementioned was involved. 
Don't throw stones at me for thinking outside the box - only bananas! LOL


A_News_Junkie_Monkey

No banana throwing form me.  NOBODY knows what happened to Lindsey Baum.  We are all speculating with what little information is know.  DD has created threads in her focus on Wayne Watnee as well as sex offenders in the area.  No banana throwing from Monkeys.  However ... Tamikosmom has been hit several times by those bananas in her speculations on Josh Baum ... the young man who had a heated argument with his sister only minutes prior to her disappearance ... a heated argument that required intervention

 ::MonkeyWaa::

That's OK.  I give those bruised bananas to my neighbour who makes delicious banana bread and ... my hubby is the happy recipient of at least one loaf.  You see ... his wife spend too much time on the computer and ... bought cookies is where it is at.

   ::MonkeyNoNo::

Janet

++++++

A RUMOUR OR THE TRUTH?


mamahead:
 
Lindsey has been afraid of her brother for a very long time. He has threatned her many times. Where is she? And why is the mother not crazy with sadness or emotion. Show us some tears. The friend that Lindsey was last with shows more emotion than the mother. And why was the brother begging for money for fireworks at his little sisters candlelight vigil?

http://www.king5.com/topstories/stories/NW_070609WAB-missing-mccleary-girl-SW.14c01624.html


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3 7/28/09 -
Post by: love4ever on August 08, 2009, 07:59:15 PM
ooops..lol

I think about a hundreds ways to research and work with what I can, if i can not find information on a person or location that is relevant, I move on to a place in research in which I can help. It drives me crazy, but when I get to a place in research where I can go no further, I move on. Everyday, I hope there is something new to guide us into further research, but mostly everyday i wish Lindsey would come home.


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3 7/28/09 -
Post by: A_News_Junkie_Monkey on August 08, 2009, 08:01:08 PM
Think about it.


Is there a particular reason you frequently tell us to "think about it"?  That is exactly what all of us have been doing - we do think about it.  Just curious.


I think about a hundreds ways to research and work with what I can, if i can not find information on a person or location that is relevant, I move on to a place in research in which I can help. It drives me crazy, but when I get to a place in research where I can go no further, I move on. Everyday, I hope there is something new to guide us into further research, but mostly everyday i wish Lindsey would come home.
I think on it in multiple ways at the same time - even when my heart knows truth as in Caylee case.  I dream on it.  I sleep (sometimes) on it.  I blog on it.  I try to keep an open objective mind till the ruling is made and sometimes then, I still think on it. 
Some things are last in my thoughts and a child being involved in her disappearance right now, is last in my thoughts. 
Here is hoping we know soon.


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3 7/28/09 -
Post by: Tamikosmom on August 08, 2009, 08:02:41 PM
Think about it.



Is there a particular reason you frequently tell us to "think about it"?  That is exactly what all of us have been doing - we do think about it.  Just curious.

No particular reason.  Only my articulation of emphasis.

It is the point of my posts that I desire others to comprehend and responds to.  My articulation ... my spelling ... my grammer ... are a non-issue.

Janet


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3 7/28/09 -
Post by: A_News_Junkie_Monkey on August 08, 2009, 08:03:47 PM
Think about it.
     <------------ inserting quote where I think it is missing!

Is there a particular reason you frequently tell us to "think about it"?  That is exactly what all of us have been doing - we do think about it.  Just curious.


I think about a hundreds ways to research and work with what I can, if i can not find information on a person or location that is relevant, I move on to a place in research in which I can help. It drives me crazy, but when I get to a place in research where I can go no further, I move on. Everyday, I hope there is something new to guide us into further research, but mostly everyday i wish Lindsey would come home. <----------love4ever
I think on it in multiple ways at the same time - even when my heart knows truth as in Caylee case.  I dream on it.  I sleep (sometimes) on it.  I blog on it.  I try to keep an open objective mind till the ruling is made and sometimes then, I still think on it. 
Some things are last in my thoughts and a child being involved in her disappearance right now, is last in my thoughts. 
Here is hoping we know soon. <------------- ANJM


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3 7/28/09 -
Post by: sunshine12 on August 08, 2009, 08:04:36 PM
I'm interested if there was another person at Kara's house or not  ::MonkeyEek::



Quote from: sunshine12 on July 05, 2009, 06:42:50 PM

i also am curious as to who exactly was in the kampen home the night that lindsey disappeared?


KaraK
Re: Lindsey Baum, 10y missing from McCleary, WA 6/26/09
« Reply #1163 on: July 05, 2009, 06:52:39 PM »


My house - Myself, Scott and my 4 kids.

http://scaredmonkeys.net/index.php?topic=5541.msg865334;topicseen#msg865334





right, but who knows, according to mlachester this is not true. so we don't know who's telling the truth


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3 7/28/09 -
Post by: Sister on August 08, 2009, 08:07:51 PM
Janet
++++++
A RUMOUR OR THE TRUTH?

mamahead:
 
Lindsey has been afraid of her brother for a very long time. He has threatned her many times. Where is she? And why is the mother not crazy with sadness or emotion. Show us some tears. The friend that Lindsey was last with shows more emotion than the mother. And why was the brother begging for money for fireworks at his little sisters candlelight vigil?

http://www.king5.com/topstories/stories/NW_070609WAB-missing-mccleary-girl-SW.14c01624.html


I really don't understand -- the issue of the "begging" for money has been discussed and at least most monkeys came to agree that was not what he was doing.   The issue of Lindsey's mom's emotions have been discussed, the relationship between Lindsey and her brother has been discussed.  It's your right to post it, I know, but truly, why is this here?  I truly do not understand all the bumping and snipping . . . I am not throwing any bananas.  I like to eat them for myself.  Time for a nap.  This is making me . . .
 :2brickwall:


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3 7/28/09 -
Post by: no rose colored glasses on August 08, 2009, 08:12:13 PM
I'm interested if there was another person at Kara's house or not  ::MonkeyEek::

so am i... i thought i read somewhere when lindsey first went missing that there was but i need to go find that information...

my thing is...would this be the type of question asked during a polygraph test?

either way, i agree that either mlachester or karak are lying and whoever it is it's a sin.
I agree, and I think it is relevant if someone else was in that home that night.


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3 7/28/09 -
Post by: sunshine12 on August 08, 2009, 08:17:18 PM
i have to trust that le has accounted for jb's whereabouts as well as the mother's whereabouts. how could they not have? if they didn't im sure the fbi did, they are not incompetent.  there's no way jb was involved in this.


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3 7/28/09 -
Post by: Tracygirl on August 08, 2009, 08:19:34 PM
Some are saying to "think about it" I say, "ask yourself why?" Why are the fingers pointing? What purpose does it serve to not want a search to happen? What purpose does it serve to lie and mislead?  Why? Why? Why??? IS Lindsey right "under their noses?"


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3 7/28/09 -
Post by: Tamikosmom on August 08, 2009, 08:20:40 PM
Think about it.

There was a confirmed sighting of Lindsey at 5th on Maple at 9:30 PM just two blocks from the Baum residence.  This would coincide with Kara Kampen and Scott Williams' time frame in regards to when Lindsey left their residence.

Considering Melissa Baum and Scott Williams passed a polygraph ... it can be assumed that neither participated in an action that resulted the disappearances of Lindsey or ... at that time possessed any knowledge encompassing what happened.

The above would imply that something happened to Lindsey in that two block stretched.

Inquiring minds want to know.  Did Josh Baum returned home as instructed following the argument with his sister?  Was he home with Mom between 9:15 PM and 9:30 PM?

Janet

++++++

KOMO News – July 2, 2009

The missing girl's mother, who wanted avoid becoming the center of the investigation, voluntarily took a polygraph test. The father of the girl's best friend, Scott Williams, also volunteered to take the test.

"At their requests polygraphs were given to them. They passed those polygraphs. We're comfortable with the information they've shared with us and comfortable with the timeline they've explained," said Grays Harbor County Undersheriff Rick Scott.

http://www.komonews.com/news/49651607.html


If my above two questions involving Lindsey's brother are answered ... Melissa Baum, Scott Willaims and Josh Baum ... in the process of elimination ... can all be eliminated as persons of interest.

Simple.

Janet


Janet,  I don't know who, beyond the police themselves can provide this information to you.  Why don't you contact them with your question? Or send them an email?  Clearly we are not going to be able to provide a link to you that will answer these questions for you. I am afraid that you are so convinced that this is what happened, that you may be  overlooking more obvious evidence that may lead in a totally different direction, or worse causing someone else to do so. 

 ::MonkeyShocked::

AZSunny ... each Monkey on this forum is free to pursue the avenue of speculation that they wish.

I do not believe that a stranger/a sex offender had anything to do with Lindsey Baum's disappearance.  However ... I have read page after page of research by Monkeys who lean in this direction.  I sincerely attempt to comprehend why it is believed that a stranger abduction is a possibility.  However ... when all is said and done ... I fail to grasp.  Nevertheless ... considering the truth remains elusive ... who am I to say that this avenue of speculative is distracting others from the truth.

Janet

++++++

Expert: Missing girl likely went with someone she knew
09:58 PM PDT on Wednesday, July 1, 2009


A national expert helping in the search for 10-year-old Lindsey Baum says someone Lindsey knew might be responsible for her disappearance. Baum vanished while walking home from a friend’s house Friday around 9 p.m.

"Based on the information I have, it’s someone she possibly knows or is in the area, not outside the area," said Henry Schmidt, with the National Center for Missing and Exploited Children.

Schmidt, a retired sheriff from Wyoming, arrived in McCleary to assist with the search Sunday.  

http://www.nwcn.com/statenews/washington/stories/NW_070109WAB-mccleary-KS.260ea8b9.html 


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3 7/28/09 -
Post by: love4ever on August 08, 2009, 08:21:07 PM
Think about it.
     <------------ inserting quote where I think it is missing!

Is there a particular reason you frequently tell us to "think about it"?  That is exactly what all of us have been doing - we do think about it.  Just curious.


I think about a hundreds ways to research and work with what I can, if i can not find information on a person or location that is relevant, I move on to a place in research in which I can help. It drives me crazy, but when I get to a place in research where I can go no further, I move on. Everyday, I hope there is something new to guide us into further research, but mostly everyday i wish Lindsey would come home. <----------love4ever
I think on it in multiple ways at the same time - even when my heart knows truth as in Caylee case.  I dream on it.  I sleep (sometimes) on it.  I blog on it.  I try to keep an open objective mind till the ruling is made and sometimes then, I still think on it. 
Some things are last in my thoughts and a child being involved in her disappearance right now, is last in my thoughts. 
Here is hoping we know soon. <------------- ANJM

Why Thank you.LOL


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3 7/28/09 -
Post by: sunshine12 on August 08, 2009, 08:21:55 PM
I've been thinking of Lindsey and how sad the whole thing really is. I haven't forgotten her. I have thought of all the things that everyone here has also considered. I agree that all scenarios have been explored. I don't think anything or any one thing has been over looked here. Everyone has pretty much had their thoughts posted and explanations examined.

And of course people don't just vanish or dematerialize. It doesn't happen. I think it's safe to rule out a bigfoot abduction as there has only been one person that ever claimed he was abducted by a bigfoot. That a funny story unto itself and better suited for the musing thread I suppose.

In thinking of what could have happened to Lindsey, I am quite sure this is an abduction. In fact, I am 110% sure. But what type of abduction? Someone from the net? I don't think so and her computer records have been carefully examined - after all it's been more than a month and adequate time to examine all technical forensic data. I think this is not the avenue LE is searching. And as I posted the other day - I think the LE is telling the truth - they don't know what happened. Sorry to say - they are stymied. What could the LE gain by playing a game with information? none that I can see and a little girl is missing. Games are better used on terrorists to gain info, not round up a phantom church cult when a little girl needs to be found.

I believe this is a stranger abduction and a crime of opportunity. Maybe I'm wrong, and unlike other posters - I don't think she is nearby at all. I sure hope I'm wrong. This type of abduction would be the most difficult to solve and I think this has many of the hallmarks.

In thinking about what happened - MAYBE NO ONE SAW ANYTHING. I know I know - how could that happen? We have one person saying she saw her walking to a point and that was it. Dogs pick her scent up to an area and that was that. A creek area was search 6 times and nothing. I don't think anyone saw anything and as hard as that is to believe - I think that's what happened. Stranger things have happened and children have even been abducted out of their own rooms while the parents have been in the same house on the same floor. It happens. And sometimes no one sees anything.

I guess it's always easier for us as internet posters to say - someone knows something and is holding that info. Maybe that's not the case here and no one knows anything. I know that an extremely bitter pill to swallow, but how do you explain what happened here over the last 6 weeks? I have no explanation other than  - no one saw anything.

Maybe this white mystery van with the Washington plates was used. A van would block three lines of sight. And if someone used a van - there is a good chance that there is an accomplice that does the snatching and grabbing with the side doors as the other person drives. This eliminates the need to really stop and draw attention. There is a reason those vans are called serial killer vans. And abduction like this could take seconds. That's all it would take - 5 seconds and gone.

Anyway - I have not forgotten about Lindsey and wonder where she is and hope there is a big break in the case soon. I hope her family receieves the strength they need to make it through the days ahead as the wait for her to return...

Prayers for Lindsey.   

BUMP BUMP BUMP


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3 7/28/09 -
Post by: no rose colored glasses on August 08, 2009, 08:23:46 PM
Some are saying to "think about it" I say, "ask yourself why?" Why are the fingers pointing? What purpose does it serve to not want a search to happen? What purpose does it serve to lie and mislead?  Why? Why? Why??? IS Lindsey right "under their noses?"
I have no idea, why the people are behaving this way, unless they just have their minds made up on it and they are not going to budge and help.  ::MonkeyConfused:: With Robert in Idaho, I'm sure most of the people that helped search and just helped period with questioning, had some idea that perhaps the boyfriend or mom did something to Robert, but they still helped.


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3 7/28/09 -
Post by: Tracygirl on August 08, 2009, 08:27:04 PM
It could be someone Lindsey has known who has her, for whatever reason. Anything from protecting her (or they say) to hurting her. If this is true, I hope they let her come home and end this. The important thing is she comes home.


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3 7/28/09 -
Post by: Sister on August 08, 2009, 08:29:44 PM
excellent point No Rose.


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3 7/28/09 -
Post by: Sister on August 08, 2009, 08:31:44 PM
It could be someone Lindsey has known who has her, for whatever reason. Anything from protecting her (or they say) to hurting her. If this is true, I hope they let her come home and end this. The important thing is she comes home.

Tracygirl, of this I am 100% confident, there is not a monkey here that doesn't want her to come home.  We may disagree, but I believe we agree on Lindsey coming home!!


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3 7/28/09 -
Post by: no rose colored glasses on August 08, 2009, 08:35:12 PM
excellent point No Rose.
Thank-you, and I was thinking of other cases as well, and there is no way the town I grew up in would do this either and it is small like McCleary, it makes no sense to be acting this way about a child, I don't care if you don't like the mom or brother, this little girl did nothing, and needs help  ::MonkeyConfused::


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3 7/28/09 -
Post by: Tracygirl on August 08, 2009, 08:35:28 PM
Yes, we all want for Lindsey to be found, there is no denying that for a second! Where could she be? Who could have her? Has everyone been considered and cleared? Have all of the "why's" been asked and answered?


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3 7/28/09 -
Post by: Sister on August 08, 2009, 08:37:33 PM
sunshine, thanks for bump on the head and -- the humor I needed that!
 :smt075


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3 7/28/09 -
Post by: doubledecker on August 08, 2009, 08:39:00 PM
I'm interested if there was another person at Kara's house or not  ::MonkeyEek::



Quote from: sunshine12 on July 05, 2009, 06:42:50 PM

i also am curious as to who exactly was in the kampen home the night that lindsey disappeared?


KaraK
Re: Lindsey Baum, 10y missing from McCleary, WA 6/26/09
« Reply #1163 on: July 05, 2009, 06:52:39 PM »


My house - Myself, Scott and my 4 kids.

http://scaredmonkeys.net/index.php?topic=5541.msg865334;topicseen#msg865334





right, but who knows, according to mlachester this is not true. so we don't know who's telling the truth

hi sunshine, gee I missed this part I guess.  did ML say someone else was at kara's.  I totally missed that was out here publically.  Where was that at do you remember?  because if you show me where it is , I will share something.


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3 7/28/09 -
Post by: Leroy on August 08, 2009, 08:45:04 PM
I'm interested if there was another person at Kara's house or not  ::MonkeyEek::



Quote from: sunshine12 on July 05, 2009, 06:42:50 PM

i also am curious as to who exactly was in the kampen home the night that lindsey disappeared?


KaraK
Re: Lindsey Baum, 10y missing from McCleary, WA 6/26/09
« Reply #1163 on: July 05, 2009, 06:52:39 PM »


My house - Myself, Scott and my 4 kids.

http://scaredmonkeys.net/index.php?topic=5541.msg865334;topicseen#msg865334





right, but who knows, according to mlachester this is not true. so we don't know who's telling the truth

hi sunshine, gee I missed this part I guess.  did ML say someone else was at kara's.  I totally missed that was out here publically.  Where was that at do you remember?  because if you show me where it is , I will share something.

I am not Sunshine but the only time I've heard this is when you mentioned it in this post (a few pages back)....that may be what she is referring to..

Re: Lindsey Baum #3 7/28/09 -
« Reply #903 on: Today at 12:52:08 PM »


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3 7/28/09 -
Post by: Tamikosmom on August 08, 2009, 08:45:54 PM


I have no link, and if you need links for everything I state, then you can disregard 90% of what I say, because I am talking to people outright, they are not posting this stuff.  just like I don't have a link for what the detective told me either.  Neither does lachester have links, but her own posts prove she has lied.  At least my posts don't prove I am lying LOL...

but if you want to believe ML, then believe this, the cops checked out josh, and just so you will know... that info came from ML... so if you want to believe her, believe that too, you can't pick and choose which parts of her stories you wish to believe.  either believe her or don't.  she is the one who states the police checked out josh baum and the places he hangs out.  now I do believe that part because I don't believe she would like about anything that makes josh look guilty, as she is saying she believes melissa and josh had something to do with lindsey's disappearance. 

you can believe what you like, as anyone else can believe what they like.  If you need links from me to believe me, then just skip over my posts.  I post everything to document when there are records, when I give my own opinion I state it is just that ... opinion... when I say something from the "local rumor mill" I state that also. 

ML is part of that local rumor mill.  and believe me she is a HUGE part of that local rumor mill.  but she is not the only part of the local rumor mill, however, she knows a lot of the ones who are, and all this stuff is going around and around and around, and several people are outright lying.  so are they also lying to the police? 

again ML states someone else was living at kara's.  that is something else no one knows about.  oh you have to hear this story!  LOL  but kara has never even heard of anyone with this person's name.  so who is lying here?  ml or kara.  if ml told the police this person was living at kara's and was there the night lindsey disappeared, don't you think the police would go ask kara about this person.  especially when they got a broken rib at kara's house that night ACCORDING TO MARILYN???

see what I am saying, I hear a lot more than what I say,  one of these people are lying their butts off.  it will all come out in the wash.  the police are not going to say these things to the public, there are no articles about all this stuff, there are no links.  but they are still going on nonetheless.  And one of these two are lying their butts off.  but if there was another person at kara's that night, who might I add marily states actually lived at kara's, and if they ended up with a broken rib that night trying to crawl through the window etc, AS MARILYN STATES, then the police should know about that.  funny though, kara never ever even heard of this person, let alone that they lived with her and was crawling through her window and ended up with a broken rib. 

now see what is going on behind the scenes?  no wonder people in mccleary won't help search for lindsey, heck they probably think kara, melissa, or josh killed her and so why help them look for her. 

I'll tell you what, if marilyn is causing all this crap she needs her butt kicked.  on the other hand if she is telling the truth, (which we can prove some of it is lies), then they better go find the guy who lived at kara's house with the broken rib.  in fact I will just email that over to them today.  they can put an end to all this crap. 

BUMPED


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3 7/28/09 -
Post by: Tracygirl on August 08, 2009, 08:48:26 PM
Some are saying to "think about it" I say, "ask yourself why?" Why are the fingers pointing? What purpose does it serve to not want a search to happen? What purpose does it serve to lie and mislead?  Why? Why? Why??? IS Lindsey right "under their noses?"
I have no idea, why the people are behaving this way, unless they just have their minds made up on it and they are not going to budge and help.  ::MonkeyConfused:: With Robert in Idaho, I'm sure most of the people that helped search and just helped period with questioning, had some idea that perhaps the boyfriend or mom did something to Robert, but they still helped.
So this is my question, if the town believes the mom and brother has something to do with this, why not look for the body? What is making them not look? That to me is very strange and is against basic human nature I would think.
in a previous posting I talked about Tracy looking for Sandra, we would have looked high and low regardless if we believed her family was involved, maybe even more so because we would have felt worse she could have died at the hands of her own mother or sibling, my god! But to not want to search? That I dont understand and makes me ask the question...Why? 


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3 7/28/09 -
Post by: Leroy on August 08, 2009, 08:49:53 PM
Thanks Janet.  When I try to cut several stacks I usually end up creating a big mess  ::MonkeyHaHa::


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3 7/28/09 -
Post by: sunshine12 on August 08, 2009, 08:50:12 PM
let me add to this info, as I believe people take all of this however they choose to further what they think, when actually, I have heard a LOT LOT more having to do with this but because it has NOTHING at all to do with Josh Baum and might be something that would sway people into thinking things they should not (because I can't post ALL of what this is about), then I think I should at least say what I personally think about all of this. 

I believe there is some on-going feud(if you will) between ML(marilyn Lachester) and MB(Melissa Baum).  supposedly marilyn has called the police on Melissa Baum 3-4 times and has called cps on her once.  This happened in the summer of 2008 as far as I am told.  Mind you I had someone who knows marilyn ask her specific questions and these are the answers I am getting(I intend to talk with Marilyn herself, to be certain this is actually what she said, however, I already believe the person who asked for me, but just to be able to say it is from the horses mouth, I intend to veryify all of this through Marilyn).... in the meantime I am sharing what I can from the person who asked her for me. 

I asked for the phone number the 911 call was called from and the date, so jessstar could try to find the report.  what I was told as an answer to these questions was:

911 was called in the summer of 2008.  Marilyn called 3-4 times to the police.  She called cps once on Melissa Baum.  This had nothing to do with Josh Baum.  Marilyn says she does not know if a report was made or not.  She called them and she does not know what they did concerning making a report, but she "assumes" there is an incident report because she called them.  So there very well might not be a report at all. 

Evidently, nothing happened about all of these calls because lindsey was still living at home with her mother.  So whatever it was which marilyn called about did not seem important enough to the police to do anything about it. 

Now I do know a couple of things marilyn called about, but I am not going to post that, she can post it somewhere if she chooses to do so, which it seems as though she has no qualms about posting about Melissa or Josh.

If marilyn is telling the truth about what she felt was wrong enough that she needed to call the police and cps, then the question is, was it really happening?  Well, evidently the police did not think it anything that warranted lindsey being taken out of the home or for her mother to be  in trouble etc;  so here is what you have to decided to believe.  Was there really anything that bad going on.  Did the police do their job in looking at the accusations by marilyn?  Was marilyn just mad at MB and josh and was calling about things that were not true or blown out of proportion?  Was lindsey telling marilyn things and marilyn thought they were worse than they were?

see we don't KNOW, all I know is what marilyn is saying and that she does not know if there is a police report and also that the police did nothing about anything.  so what does that tell us?  It tells us either the police did not do their job and neither did cps, or... there is nothing bad going on to warrant any action by the police or cps. 

I also have info from another source other than marilyn about one of these incidents where there is a report.  And it had nothing at all to do with josh baum, and it was nothing that anyone got in trouble for nor did it warrant taking lindsey out of the home etc.  And from the extent of what I have been told actually happened, it was something that probably 80% or 90% of people would have done under the circumstances, IF the circumstances are such that I have been told.  However, am I told the truth?  I believe I was, as the police did not think this was out of line to do and no actionns were taken about it. 

Now why is marilyn saying all these horrible things were going on, I don't know.  She probably believes they were.  Obviously the police do not believe they were, or both the police and cps just did not care.  who really knows. 

as for the white car incident, supposedly marilyn is saying this happened a week before lindsey disappeared, however, marilyn HEARD about it, she did not KNOW about it.  Marilyn was not even living in McCleary at this time, she still does not live in McCleary.  She does have a lot of friends there and she does HEAR things. 

Now this is something I have no idea what this is about, but love4ever has dug up a court record for ML for assault in the summer of 2008.  I have no idea what this is about, but we can see that ML also assaults people.  So who do we believe here? 

I really don't know.  I do know what the report is about, and it has absolutely NOTHING AT ALL to do with josh baum.   


DD

What if Lindsey is telling the truth regarding her brother's abuse?  What if mlachester is revealing exactly how the incident unfolded?

Janet



<snipped>

... but for your peace of mind, the police did check out josh... so as you keep saying about a free pass, he did NOT get one.  he was looked at.

<snipped> 


 ::MonkeyShocked::

Link please.

DD ... I have not read one quote from Kara, Melissa or Sheriff Scott that Josh Baum was considered a person of interest in the process of elimination in the investigation and ...  was interrogated accordingly.

One quote in regards to a police interrogation or ... one quote that reveals that Josh Baum went home per the family friend's instructions ... one quote that reveals that this young man was with his Mom when his sister left the Kampen/Williams residence ... will shut this wannabe detective up in regards to Josh Baum.

KaraK would not answer me directly in regards to whether Josh Baum went straight home as instructed following the argument with his sister.

Janet



I have no link, and if you need links for everything I state, then you can disregard 90% of what I say, because I am talking to people outright, they are not posting this stuff.  just like I don't have a link for what the detective told me either.  Neither does lachester have links, but her own posts prove she has lied.  At least my posts don't prove I am lying LOL...

but if you want to believe ML, then believe this, the cops checked out josh, and just so you will know... that info came from ML... so if you want to believe her, believe that too, you can't pick and choose which parts of her stories you wish to believe.  either believe her or don't.  she is the one who states the police checked out josh baum and the places he hangs out.  now I do believe that part because I don't believe she would like about anything that makes josh look guilty, as she is saying she believes melissa and josh had something to do with lindsey's disappearance. 

you can believe what you like, as anyone else can believe what they like.  If you need links from me to believe me, then just skip over my posts.  I post everything to document when there are records, when I give my own opinion I state it is just that ... opinion... when I say something from the "local rumor mill" I state that also. 

ML is part of that local rumor mill.  and believe me she is a HUGE part of that local rumor mill.  but she is not the only part of the local rumor mill, however, she knows a lot of the ones who are, and all this stuff is going around and around and around, and several people are outright lying.  so are they also lying to the police? 

again ML states someone else was living at kara's.  that is something else no one knows about.  oh you have to hear this story!  LOL  but kara has never even heard of anyone with this person's name.  so who is lying here?  ml or kara.  if ml told the police this person was living at kara's and was there the night lindsey disappeared, don't you think the police would go ask kara about this person.  especially when they got a broken rib at kara's house that night ACCORDING TO MARILYN???
see what I am saying, I hear a lot more than what I say,  one of these people are lying their butts off.  it will all come out in the wash.  the police are not going to say these things to the public, there are no articles about all this stuff, there are no links.  but they are still going on nonetheless.  And one of these two are lying their butts off.  but if there was another person at kara's that night, who might I add marily states actually lived at kara's, and if they ended up with a broken rib that night trying to crawl through the window etc, AS MARILYN STATES, then the police should know about that.  funny though, kara never ever even heard of this person, let alone that they lived with her and was crawling through her window and ended up with a broken rib. 

now see what is going on behind the scenes?  no wonder people in mccleary won't help search for lindsey, heck they probably think kara, melissa, or josh killed her and so why help them look for her. 

I'll tell you what, if marilyn is causing all this crap she needs her butt kicked.  on the other hand if she is telling the truth, (which we can prove some of it is lies), then they better go find the guy who lived at kara's house with the broken rib.  in fact I will just email that over to them today.  they can put an end to all this crap. 


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3 7/28/09 -
Post by: sunshine12 on August 08, 2009, 08:52:28 PM
ahh...sorry dd, i forgot to add this part to the past post that i copied from you where i bolded the part about mlachester saying someone else was in the home...

anyway what i was going to add to that was that i remember in the very beginning of the investigation reading somewhere that there was someone other than karak, her old man, and her kids in the home...i am going to go search for that now. i dont know why i remember this so clearly maybe i am nuts or something but i really have remembered that from day one... im going to try to find the info now. i will be back soon!


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3 7/28/09 -
Post by: Tamikosmom on August 08, 2009, 08:52:37 PM
Thanks Janet.  When I try to cut several stacks I usually end up creating a big mess  ::MonkeyHaHa::

I often mess up in my attempt to cut stacks also.  However ... MuffyBee comes to my rescue ... often without asking.

Leroy ... I hope you are have a good Saturday.

Janet


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3 7/28/09 -
Post by: A_News_Junkie_Monkey on August 08, 2009, 09:08:00 PM
Yes, we all want for Lindsey to be found, there is no denying that for a second! Where could she be? Who could have her? Has everyone been considered and cleared? Have all of the "why's" been asked and answered?

Not yet or we would have found her.   ::MonkeyNoNo::


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3 7/28/09 -
Post by: sunshine12 on August 08, 2009, 09:08:01 PM
janet-

i am just wondering how you think jb could have abducted his sister and where she is now if he did do something to her?

i am also wondering if you have a theory which involved mb that you would be willing to share with us?


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3 7/28/09 -
Post by: doubledecker on August 08, 2009, 09:08:46 PM
omg laugh, sunshine, yah I guess I did blurt that out didn't I. LOL

get me mad and people I am liable to blurt out anything !!!!! ::MonkeyDevil::

okay gee hmmm

yes I was told marylin's friend was living at kara's house.  And now I am told he broke his rib crawling through kara's window to get in. this is suppose to be the night lindsey went missing. 

So I had heard before quite awhile ago that marilyn's friend lived there was a roommate of kara's.  I told kara about this and kara says she never even heard of a guy with this first name.  of course kara knew I could find the guy living there, so why would she lie to me.  So I just went on to other things.  Now just a few days ago, I think yesterday in fact I am told this guy was there that night and crawled through the window and broke his rib. 

now you posters think about this.  ONE of them is lying... either ML is lying about the guy living there, about breaking his rib there crawling through the window that night....or... kara is lying saying she never heard of the guy.  so which is it.  the guy works right there in mccleary, he is marylin's friend, he exists, I looked him up. 

now why would either kara or marilyn lie about this?  well ONE of them is out and out lying.  so who is it? 

another thing, the reason I spent all that time looking at the satanists in that church and who sacrifice young girls on a mountain is this very info was coming from the same people who is telling me all this other stuff.  So if you think I just pulled that stuff out of my hat, or my A$$ haha, I didn't.  I was told these things.  I was told about the sex offender after I found adam campbell... btw I was emailing back and forth with adam the whole time.  I did not just make up these theories, I was researching things that were either told to me by locals or I found in documents etc, or in adam's case I was talking to the guy while others were calling him a bot.  I was in contact with the det's about adam while people were still calling him a bot. 

believe me I am not making any of these things up.  I don't waste my time making up craziness and then posting about it.  I don't have time to do that.  I am in contact with several locals.  I am told things, so I look at them. 

I am also being lied to by some of these people.  it is obvious to me they are lying.  why is the question.  and I believe it is their lies which are hindering finding lindsey and that pisses me off to no end.  It is also maddening when someone sends me on a wild goose chase for whatever reason and takes me off of something that is legit, because they are insisting they know something only for me to figure out down the line they are lying their butts off.  I'm REALLY trying to help here.  I don't have time to waste posting on a board for entertainment or for the sake of arguing etc.  There is always some other missing person someone needs help with and while people are lying and sending me on wild goose chases some other missing person is sitting on the backburner while I fool around with liars. 

I can see why the police get so frustrated and get rude to liars and idiots.  it is all a huge waste of time when they could be investigating REAL leads.  now I don't know why these people are lying but they are.  And if I were the police I would find out why someone feels the need to tell so many lies... maybe they already have been looking, maybe they are watching them now just waiting for the person to really mess up so they can arrest them or follow them to where lindsey is, I don't know, but they see these lies, believe me, if I see them, they see them.  and if they don't see them they can ask me and I will tell them.  but they see them I am sure, they don't need me telling them.  they watch the net, they talk to people, they hear things, they see the discrepancies, they know who is lying and who is not.  they are going to catch who is doing this, and I will be one person who will be glad they caught you.


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3 7/28/09 -
Post by: doubledecker on August 08, 2009, 09:10:47 PM
ahh...sorry dd, i forgot to add this part to the past post that i copied from you where i bolded the part about mlachester saying someone else was in the home...

anyway what i was going to add to that was that i remember in the very beginning of the investigation reading somewhere that there was someone other than karak, her old man, and her kids in the home...i am going to go search for that now. i dont know why i remember this so clearly maybe i am nuts or something but i really have remembered that from day one... im going to try to find the info now. i will be back soon!

thank you very much sunshine, I don't doubt you at all.. I 100000% believe you saw that somewhere, it is just that I missed that, and I would really like to know who said that and where that originated from the public.  I know where what I know originated from, I just want to know where the other originated from and where this all started.  thanks, I hope you can find that.


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3 7/28/09 -
Post by: Sister on August 08, 2009, 09:16:59 PM
dd, I'm dense, why would he crawl through a window?  Was he hiding from . . . who?  Poor fella, did he have to go to the hospital I wonder?


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3 7/28/09 -
Post by: Tracygirl on August 08, 2009, 09:27:31 PM
So I suppose the obvious question would be, is this other person listed at Kara's address? Seems easy enough to find out. Also, did this person get looked at for a broken rib at a hospital? A broken rib is very painful and can hurt to breath I would think someone would go to a doctor? I wonder if there is a record of that and if he had anything else wrong with him?

I don't know who is lying but who ever it is, that is not a good one.


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3 7/28/09 -
Post by: Tracygirl on August 08, 2009, 09:30:47 PM
dd, I'm dense, why would he crawl through a window?  Was he hiding from . . . who?  Poor fella, did he have to go to the hospital I wonder?

Maybe he lost his key? lol, your right, why go through the window? If he lived there I would assume he was allowed to go through the front door.


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3 7/28/09 -
Post by: Sister on August 08, 2009, 09:31:54 PM
Sunshine, this is #1165 on Thread #! -- I don't know if it helps.

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Quote from: sunshine12 on July 05, 2009, 02:42:50 PM
http://freelancersstartingplace.blogspot.com/2009/06/missing-10-year-old-girl-in-mccleary-wa.html

i dont know if i am allowed to post this in here, but i know that kara does blog for a living or something along those lines and was wondering if she got paid to write the above blog. just curious.

i also am curious as to who exactly was in the kampen home the night that lindsey disappeared?

another question...could it be possible for lindsey to have spoke by phone w/someone that she planned to meet up with, maybe an older boy or something and then met him on the way home maybe he drives, picked her up on her route home and things went horribly wrong? 


No I didn't get paid to write the above blog. I did that merely to try and get her pic and name out. I am not sure if there is a way to check it but I am only an infrequent blogger. I've also written 2 other articles that went up for no upfront and display only and I will most likely put up more articles if there is any new updates, leads or most likely even if nothing is found.

My house - Myself, Scott and my 4 kids.

Police have had her cell phone since the first day and my phone was charging at the time in the kitchen where she never went. Not sure if they checked her house phone or not - we don't have a regular house phone though here.


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3 7/28/09 -
Post by: no rose colored glasses on August 08, 2009, 09:32:00 PM
dd, I'm dense, why would he crawl through a window?  Was he hiding from . . . who?  Poor fella, did he have to go to the hospital I wonder?
I wondered that also, and this guy exists, and someone is lying. I know who I believe is lying and have felt it for awhile.


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3 7/28/09 -
Post by: doubledecker on August 08, 2009, 09:34:07 PM
dd, I'm dense, why would he crawl through a window?  Was he hiding from . . . who?  Poor fella, did he have to go to the hospital I wonder?

sister I have not even bothered to ask.  I guess he lost his keys I think they said, let me get the wording.

how about this, I just copy the email here,

_______________________________

this is to me from a friend of marilyns

first off she does suspect josh and his mom, because she thinks his mom lets him do anything and all the abuse she witnessed.  also she says the place she heard the dogs last picked up a scent (which she acknowledges is hearsay) is the same street she lived on at pine and 1st, and she's kinda haunted by that, she says lindsey would always run to her.  the phone number she made those 911 calls, which she says were at least 3 or 4, was xxxxxxxx, and it was around summer of last year, something like that.  she doesn't know if cops made a report or what they did exactly, but says they would have had to do an incident report or something, and one time she called CPS on melissa baum when lindsey came over with welts from her calfs to her back.  she was horrified and i think a couple others saw this at her house.  the other incidents with Josh were chasing her with knife, shovel, choking, and at least one other attack against another individual (and here i forgot to write it down, i think it was a female but can't recall if it was an adult or child, but marilyn made the call).  she says he was very violent and went to Juvi many times!  hmm.  anyway, i don't think she's lying, that's a whole lot to be lying about, haha.  she didn't hesitate or anything, she says Sgt. xxxxxxxx contacted her the very next day after lindsey disappeared and she asked him right off, have you checked the river and other places josh hangs out, and he said xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx  she's also curious about the white car, she says she was already moved when that report was made involving lindsey so she doesn't know too much else about it, but just that there's a lot of roads going in and out mccleary.  thinks kara is an attention whore.  i'll do this in 2 parts, there's more...

she doesn't know a xxxxxxx.  She says that street, Maple, is pretty short and there are very few houses on it, like 1 house w/little kids and possibly 1 house w/ older kids and maybe another house, not very residential.  She hasn't been there in a while but doesn't think she has friends there, and as far as she's heard she didn't stop anywhere, that she headed straight home.  Also, she knows for a fact xxxxxxxx was there that night although she doesn't know if he still lives there.  She happens to know because he's a friend, his name is xxxxxxx, he works at xxxxxxxxxxx and that night he either lost his keys or left them at work or the bar (he goes there a lot) and had to crawl through his window at Kara's and fell and broke his rib.  yeah, crazy.  other than that she doesn't know who all was there.  but she's definately lying about not knowing a xxxxxxx, lol.  shit, i forgot to ask her about the gosh dang witness.  and if xxxxx had a car, sheesh.  she said she don't know if melissa was lying about her car, she did see her driving it when she was there, but i heard that her key was broke or missing, something like that.  who knows on that one.  i believe it was kara who said that, about the car key. oh, the white car report w/lindsey occured within one week of her disappearance, and that's about all she knows about it.  anything i didn't answer she said i don't know.  alsoi she said you can write her xxxxxxxx, and i'll get a link to you, but i have to run xxxxxxxxxx, i'll look for the article online too, but after reading it again i really don't think there is anything new much.  weird how she says i will find my daughter, as she's selling off her stuff.  well that;s what i heard anyway, i guess it could be a rumour, i'm sure she is strapped for cash though.  god, don't know what to think about her,  very sad any which way i suppose.  xxxxxxxxxx this is just stuff about where she had to go and do stuff for family etc xxxxxxxxxx marilyn's not even convinced josh has asbergers.  it's a very subtle thing i can tell you, fine line between asbergers and asshole.  gotta run for a bit.

__________________________

end...



this is me posting now(DD)
now lets see how much of this turns out true... or how much of it already provides discrepancies for things already stated by the same person. 

if you compare this to things I have already been told and have read said, there are so many lies

 


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3 7/28/09 -
Post by: doubledecker on August 08, 2009, 09:36:44 PM
So I suppose the obvious question would be, is this other person listed at Kara's address? Seems easy enough to find out. Also, did this person get looked at for a broken rib at a hospital? A broken rib is very painful and can hurt to breath I would think someone would go to a doctor? I wonder if there is a record of that and if he had anything else wrong with him?

I don't know who is lying but who ever it is, that is not a good one.

well it is pretty simple.. either he lived there and broke his rib or he didn't.  kara says she never heard of anybody with that name, and marilyn insists he lived there and is marilyn's friend. 

can't be both ways... let the cops figure it out who is lying...


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3 7/28/09 -
Post by: Tamikosmom on August 08, 2009, 09:38:44 PM
janet-

i am just wondering how you think jb could have abducted his sister and where she is now if he did do something to her?

i am also wondering if you have a theory which involved mb that you would be willing to share with us?

sunshine

Considering Melissa Baum passed a polygraphy ... I DO NOT have a theory that involves Melissa in the initial disappearance of her daughter or ... having any initial knowledge.

However when I consider Melissa's flip flop in regards to her initial speculation that her daughter was no longer in the McCleary area ... I somehow believe that she is now in possession of specific knowledge that is contradictory and ... may have been involved in a coverup to protect Josh.

Again ... this is all speculation based on the following quotes.

Janet

++++++++


MELISSA BAUM - THEN

FOX News – July 1, 2009-08-02


Melissa Baum said she thinks her little girl Lindsey, who vanished Friday night, was snatched and is no longer in their hometown.

"I don’t think she’s in McCleary. I don’t," Baum told The Daily World of Aberdeen, Wash. "Why would they keep her in McCleary? Whoever took her went on the freeway. There are three ways to get out of McCleary and all three ways there are freeways within five or 10 minutes."

http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,5296...latestnews


MELISSA BAUM - NOW

Daily World – August 2, 2009-08-02


From the front step of her nearby home, Melissa Baum can almost see its intersection with Fifth Street where her 11-year-old daughter took her last known steps into oblivion.

“I feel like she’s right under my nose and I can’t find her,” she said.

http://**/articles/2009/08/02/local_news/doc4a75285b085b5140001671.txt



Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3 7/28/09 -
Post by: Tamikosmom on August 08, 2009, 09:56:17 PM
janet-

i am just wondering how you think jb could have abducted his sister and where she is now if he did do something to her?

i am also wondering if you have a theory which involved mb that you would be willing to share with us?

IN THE PROCESS OF ELIMINATION

JOSH BAUM


I speculate IF something happened to Lindsey at the hands of her brother ... there was a chance meeting within that two block stretch between the confirmed sighting of Lindsey and the Baum residence.  I contend that whatever happened was completely unplanned.  I am not condoning but ... the attack could could have been provoked from Josh's perspective and ... he acted impulsively.  At twelve years old ... I believe this young man would have panicked and ... bolted after the fact.  In all probability ... no attempt or ... very little attempt at hiding his sister's body.  Maybe Lindsey was covered with debris or foilage.

I believe IF the above scenario took place ... Lindsey will be found in an out-of-sight spot on one of the properties in that two block stretch or ... maybe the creek area that was searched six times.  Maybe a witness had placed Josh in the area of the creek.

Sheriff Scott stated in regards to the search the other day ... that they were calling on neighbours again and requestioning them as well as neighbours who had yet to be contacted.  It does not appear that those properties in that two block stretch were search to any extent ... only rural areas.

I am only speculating.  Lindsey Baum is missing and ... something happened to her.

Janet


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3 7/28/09 -
Post by: no rose colored glasses on August 08, 2009, 09:57:57 PM
So I suppose the obvious question would be, is this other person listed at Kara's address? Seems easy enough to find out. Also, did this person get looked at for a broken rib at a hospital? A broken rib is very painful and can hurt to breath I would think someone would go to a doctor? I wonder if there is a record of that and if he had anything else wrong with him?

I don't know who is lying but who ever it is, that is not a good one.

well it is pretty simple.. either he lived there and broke his rib or he didn't.  kara says she never heard of anybody with that name, and marilyn insists he lived there and is marilyn's friend. 

can't be both ways... let the cops figure it out who is lying...
Wow, well you are right about the fact that this mystery man would have had to get some medical attention for his rib and I would sure hope LE would be all over this mystery man and where he lived or where he once lived. Have you heard that LE has been keeping a close eye on Kara, just wondered I have read that from a local on WS? Again don't know if true or rumor.


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3 7/28/09 -
Post by: sunshine12 on August 08, 2009, 09:58:39 PM
dd-i am actively trying to find where i read that there were other people in karak's home that night besides her old man and her 4 kids... my boyfriend keeps asking him why i keep telling to "be quiet every 5 minutes" because i honestly remember reading this in the very very beginning of this case, and for some reason it stuck with me, this is driving me crazy right nwo that i cant remember. i could be wrong, or confusing things, and if so i apologize but i am generally pretty good about remembering things...i will continue to try to find where i read the info about the people in Karak's home that night, and am also looking up show transcripts in case i heard it somwhere...i just wanted to post an update that i am still looking so that everyone didn't think i forgot and fell asleep. thanks again for all your hard work... if any monkeys also might remember hearing something like this and are available tonite could you also help me look? thanks!

and by the way, for other people that were asking, broken ribs can't really be fixed they have to heal on their own. i'm sure being prescribed pain meds might help but that's about the extent of the treatment for a broken rib

also, if mlachester is lying about this person who broke their rib allegedly climbing into karak's house where this person was allegedly staying, then mlachester has some serious issues.


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3 7/28/09 -
Post by: A_News_Junkie_Monkey on August 08, 2009, 10:03:47 PM
snip from email dd posted:
the other incidents with Josh were chasing her with knife, shovel, choking,

I just saw a poster on ws posted a link where this was mentioned on King5 site.


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3 7/28/09 -
Post by: doubledecker on August 08, 2009, 10:13:59 PM
So I suppose the obvious question would be, is this other person listed at Kara's address? Seems easy enough to find out. Also, did this person get looked at for a broken rib at a hospital? A broken rib is very painful and can hurt to breath I would think someone would go to a doctor? I wonder if there is a record of that and if he had anything else wrong with him?

I don't know who is lying but who ever it is, that is not a good one.

well it is pretty simple.. either he lived there and broke his rib or he didn't.  kara says she never heard of anybody with that name, and marilyn insists he lived there and is marilyn's friend. 

can't be both ways... let the cops figure it out who is lying...
Wow, well you are right about the fact that this mystery man would have had to get some medical attention for his rib and I would sure hope LE would be all over this mystery man and where he lived or where he once lived. Have you heard that LE has been keeping a close eye on Kara, just wondered I have read that from a local on WS? Again don't know if true or rumor.

I haven't heard anything at all about the police "keeping an eye" on kara.  hmm I would like to know what local is saying that.  interesting...

but.... I don't believe they are "keeping an eye" on kara... I say this because I know kara was doing something that kept her in the public eye, and they asked her not to do that, and if they were trying to keep an eye on her they would not have wanted her to stop what she was doing.  so that makes no sense to me at all that they would be keeping an eye on kara.  I would like to know what makes that poster think that...


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3 7/28/09 -
Post by: no rose colored glasses on August 08, 2009, 10:15:00 PM
snip from email dd posted:
the other incidents with Josh were chasing her with knife, shovel, choking,

I just saw a poster on ws posted a link where this was mentioned on King5 site.
If this Marilyn is making this stuff up she really is in need of a good doctor, if she isn't making this up well.... I don't like where my mind is going. No matter what I've all been reading and I have read all the posts, I believe that Lindsey knew the person, that is the only thing that has stayed the same for me, though I have flip flopped on different scenarios.


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3 7/28/09 -
Post by: doubledecker on August 08, 2009, 10:15:59 PM
snip from email dd posted:
the other incidents with Josh were chasing her with knife, shovel, choking,

I just saw a poster on ws posted a link where this was mentioned on King5 site.

yes I had read this where marilyn had posted this also a long time ago when she first got online.


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3 7/28/09 -
Post by: no rose colored glasses on August 08, 2009, 10:16:42 PM
It was a poster on WS, I can't remember which one, and I had no idea if this was true or not, so thanks for answering that for me.


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3 7/28/09 -
Post by: doubledecker on August 08, 2009, 10:19:26 PM
snip from email dd posted:
the other incidents with Josh were chasing her with knife, shovel, choking,

I just saw a poster on ws posted a link where this was mentioned on King5 site.
If this Marilyn is making this stuff up she really is in need of a good doctor, if she isn't making this up well.... I don't like where my mind is going. No matter what I've all been reading and I have read all the posts, I believe that Lindsey knew the person, that is the only thing that has stayed the same for me, though I have flip flopped on different scenarios.

well I don't KNOW who is lying about the guy at kara's, but I do know that marilyn has lied about some things that we have proved on this board today, so some of what she says is lies, whether all of it is who knows.  but once a person starts lying to me or lying where I can see they say two different things about something, then I have a hard time knowing just what I can believe they are saying, especially, when the person they are lying about says the opposite. 

all I know it, one of them is lying, and these are pretty bad lies.  so it's out here, so I will let the police decide who is lying. 


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3 7/28/09 -
Post by: sunshine12 on August 08, 2009, 10:21:00 PM
just a comment about mlachesters beliefs about what happened.

it seems to me she might have 2 theories at work (which many people do have, including myself)...

she either a) thinks josh or the mother did something and mom is covering it up

or b) thinks this person allegedly living at karak's house who broke a rib climbing through the basement window did something...

what i want to know is...

were mlachester and karak living in mcleary around the same time? i know mlachester recently moved and karak moved in 6 months ago.. if mlachester isn't telling the truth about this person living in karak's home then why make it up?  it seems like a pretty crazy thing to make up but then again, i've seen crazier. 

i also think its interesting that mlachester did not post this message on a public forum, as she did the other messages she wrote. not sure what this means and i will speculate on that later as i think it could mean several things.

another point i wanted to make about the bruises and welt marks on lindsey:  if mlachester called cps about this incident and reported that there were physical injuries on the child, then CPS would legally have to respond to the call and see the child within 24 hours of the report, investigate, photograph the injuries, and assess the safety of the child in the home..(at least thats what we have to do where i live and i used to work for CPS and had to do this many times). if the report was unfounded, and cps decided that the injuries did not meet the child protective services law definition of "serious physical injury" then the report would be shredded in a year and expunged (this might vary by state but its pretty standard)...unfortunatly, i can tell u that unless a welt mark is pretty bad its usually unfounded (another reason why i left my old job..dont even get me started).


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3 7/28/09 -
Post by: Tracygirl on August 08, 2009, 10:21:52 PM
Snipped from DD's email exchange.

>>>it's a very subtle thing i can tell you, fine line between asbergers and asshole.  gotta run for a bit.<<<<

Sorry can't help myself.....What an ignorant comment this is.


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3 7/28/09 -
Post by: love4ever on August 08, 2009, 10:26:08 PM
snip from email dd posted:
the other incidents with Josh were chasing her with knife, shovel, choking,

I just saw a poster on ws posted a link where this was mentioned on King5 site.
If this Marilyn is making this stuff up she really is in need of a good doctor, if she isn't making this up well.... I don't like where my mind is going. No matter what I've all been reading and I have read all the posts, I believe that Lindsey knew the person, that is the only thing that has stayed the same for me, though I have flip flopped on different scenarios.

I feel it is better just to keep an opened mind, it helps relieve the tension, and flip flopping is good (LOL) It means you are objective no rose colored glasses. This is also good because if you find no other way to go in research on a specific theory you can go on to another. Hence, returning back to a previous theory if needed. I find this way you are embedded with misc information which leads you to a place in which you cover a vast area of information bounded to the case.


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3 7/28/09 -
Post by: no rose colored glasses on August 08, 2009, 10:27:15 PM
Snipped from DD's email exchange.

>>>it's a very subtle thing i can tell you, fine line between asbergers and asshole.  gotta run for a bit.<<<<

Sorry can't help myself.....What an ignorant comment this is.

I thought so also, very inconsiderate comment to make  ::MonkeyNoNo::  And Sunshine thanks for that info.


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3 7/28/09 -
Post by: no rose colored glasses on August 08, 2009, 10:29:13 PM
snip from email dd posted:
the other incidents with Josh were chasing her with knife, shovel, choking,

I just saw a poster on ws posted a link where this was mentioned on King5 site.
If this Marilyn is making this stuff up she really is in need of a good doctor, if she isn't making this up well.... I don't like where my mind is going. No matter what I've all been reading and I have read all the posts, I believe that Lindsey knew the person, that is the only thing that has stayed the same for me, though I have flip flopped on different scenarios.

I feel it is better just to keep an opened mind, it helps relieve the tension, and flip flopping is good (LOL) It means you are objective no rose colored glasses. This is also good because if you find no other way to go in research on a specific theory you can go on to another. Hence, returning back to a previous theory if needed. I find this way you are embedded with misc information which leads you to a place in which you cover a vast area of information bounded to the case.
And I also have this nagging feeling pretty much from the beginning, which I try to shake off but it just doesn't want to go away  ::MonkeyEek::


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3 7/28/09 -
Post by: doubledecker on August 08, 2009, 10:30:32 PM
just a comment about mlachesters beliefs about what happened.

it seems to me she might have 2 theories at work (which many people do have, including myself)...

she either a) thinks josh or the mother did something and mom is covering it up

or b) thinks this person allegedly living at karak's house who broke a rib climbing through the basement window did something...

what i want to know is...

were mlachester and karak living in mcleary around the same time? i know mlachester recently moved and karak moved in 6 months ago.. if mlachester isn't telling the truth about this person living in karak's home then why make it up?  it seems like a pretty crazy thing to make up but then again, i've seen crazier. 

i also think its interesting that mlachester did not post this message on a public forum, as she did the other messages she wrote. not sure what this means and i will speculate on that later as i think it could mean several things.

another point i wanted to make about the bruises and welt marks on lindsey:  if mlachester called cps about this incident and reported that there were physical injuries on the child, then CPS would legally have to respond to the call and see the child within 24 hours of the report, investigate, photograph the injuries, and assess the safety of the child in the home..(at least thats what we have to do where i live and i used to work for CPS and had to do this many times). if the report was unfounded, and cps decided that the injuries did not meet the child protective services law definition of "serious physical injury" then the report would be shredded in a year and expunged (this might vary by state but its pretty standard)...unfortunatly, i can tell u that unless a welt mark is pretty bad its usually unfounded (another reason why i left my old job..dont even get me started).

from a previous email I received about this guy living at kara's before I got a name, only a first name, I was told this was a friend of marilyn's and she didn't think he could have anything to do with lindsey missing.  this is probably why she never mentioned it on a board, she is friends with the guy.  so see, she leaves out things about her friends. 


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3 7/28/09 -
Post by: doubledecker on August 08, 2009, 10:31:38 PM
Snipped from DD's email exchange.

>>>it's a very subtle thing i can tell you, fine line between asbergers and asshole.  gotta run for a bit.<<<<

Sorry can't help myself.....What an ignorant comment this is.


yes I saw that, and I know because you really do know about asbergers that you would clear this up.


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3 7/28/09 -
Post by: Tamikosmom on August 08, 2009, 10:31:46 PM
Could it be that the Kampen/Williams residence has a rental accommodation separate from the main house.

Janet

+++++++

Quote from: sunshine12 on July 05, 2009, 06:42:50 PM

i also am curious as to who exactly was in the kampen home the night that lindsey disappeared?


KaraK
Re: Lindsey Baum, 10y missing from McCleary, WA 6/26/09
« Reply #1163 on: July 05, 2009, 06:52:39 PM »


My house - Myself, Scott and my 4 kids.

http://scaredmonkeys.net/index.php?topic=5541.msg865334;topicseen#msg865334


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3 7/28/09 -
Post by: love4ever on August 08, 2009, 10:32:22 PM
Name/AKAs       
LACHESTER, FESTUS (Age 28)


City, State         
LACEY, WA      
   
http://www.veromi.net/Summary.asp?fn=Festus&mn=&ln=lachester&dobmm=&dobdd=&doby=&city=lacey&state=WA&age=&vw=&Search=&Input=

Isn't that where Melissa baum use to live?


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3 7/28/09 -
Post by: no rose colored glasses on August 08, 2009, 10:34:50 PM
Could it be that the Kampen/Williams residence has a rental accommodation separate from the main house.

Janet

+++++++

Quote from: sunshine12 on July 05, 2009, 06:42:50 PM

i also am curious as to who exactly was in the kampen home the night that lindsey disappeared?


KaraK
Re: Lindsey Baum, 10y missing from McCleary, WA 6/26/09
« Reply #1163 on: July 05, 2009, 06:52:39 PM »


My house - Myself, Scott and my 4 kids.

http://scaredmonkeys.net/index.php?topic=5541.msg865334;topicseen#msg865334
Interesting, because I though to myself what an odd way to phrase that.


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3 7/28/09 -
Post by: doubledecker on August 08, 2009, 10:36:49 PM
Could it be that the Kampen/Williams residence has a rental accommodation separate from the main house.

Janet

+++++++

Quote from: sunshine12 on July 05, 2009, 06:42:50 PM

i also am curious as to who exactly was in the kampen home the night that lindsey disappeared?


KaraK
Re: Lindsey Baum, 10y missing from McCleary, WA 6/26/09
« Reply #1163 on: July 05, 2009, 06:52:39 PM »


My house - Myself, Scott and my 4 kids.

http://scaredmonkeys.net/index.php?topic=5541.msg865334;topicseen#msg865334

I am told in a previous email that he is a  "roommate" of kara.  that sounds like same house to me.


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3 7/28/09 -
Post by: Tracygirl on August 08, 2009, 10:38:18 PM
What is her address, we can google maps the home and see if there is another resident or if it is a duplex or something.


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3 7/28/09 -
Post by: Tracygirl on August 08, 2009, 10:41:16 PM
Snipped from DD's email exchange.

>>>it's a very subtle thing i can tell you, fine line between asbergers and asshole.  gotta run for a bit.<<<<

Sorry can't help myself.....What an ignorant comment this is.


yes I saw that, and I know because you really do know about asbergers that you would clear this up.
Not sure if one can clear up a statement such as this. I would think most people know  enough to figure out that was just a jab at this boy.


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3 7/28/09 -
Post by: Tamikosmom on August 08, 2009, 10:47:28 PM
Could it be that the Kampen/Williams residence has a rental accommodation separate from the main house.

Janet

+++++++

Quote from: sunshine12 on July 05, 2009, 06:42:50 PM

i also am curious as to who exactly was in the kampen home the night that lindsey disappeared?


KaraK
Re: Lindsey Baum, 10y missing from McCleary, WA 6/26/09
« Reply #1163 on: July 05, 2009, 06:52:39 PM »


My house - Myself, Scott and my 4 kids.

http://scaredmonkeys.net/index.php?topic=5541.msg865334;topicseen#msg865334

I am told in a previous email that he is a  "roommate" of kara.  that sounds like same house to me.

If Kara Kampen, Scott Williams and four kids were in the house why would a roommate feel the need to crawl through a window because of a lost key.  Would ringing the door bell not suffice.  I contend that crawling through a window would cause a greater disturbance.

However ... a separate residence would make crawling through a window a logical solution.

It could be that Kara did not want to reveal illegal renting accommodations on the single family zoning property.

Janet


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3 7/28/09 -
Post by: sunshine12 on August 08, 2009, 10:47:45 PM
did the search dogs pick up lindsey's scent leaving or entering karak's home?


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3 7/28/09 -
Post by: love4ever on August 08, 2009, 10:54:02 PM
I wonder how long MBaum has known KaraK?


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3 7/28/09 -
Post by: sunshine12 on August 08, 2009, 10:54:07 PM
Could it be that the Kampen/Williams residence has a rental accommodation separate from the main house.

Janet

+++++++

Quote from: sunshine12 on July 05, 2009, 06:42:50 PM

i also am curious as to who exactly was in the kampen home the night that lindsey disappeared?


KaraK
Re: Lindsey Baum, 10y missing from McCleary, WA 6/26/09
« Reply #1163 on: July 05, 2009, 06:52:39 PM »


My house - Myself, Scott and my 4 kids.

http://scaredmonkeys.net/index.php?topic=5541.msg865334;topicseen#msg865334

I am told in a previous email that he is a  "roommate" of kara.  that sounds like same house to me.

If Kara Kampen, Scott Williams and four kids were in the house why would a roommate feel the need to crawl through a window because of a lost key.  Would ringing the door bell not suffice.  I contend that crawling through a window would cause a greater disturbance.

However ... a separate residence would make crawling through a window a logical solution.

It could be that Kara did not want to reveal illegal renting accommodations on the single family zoning property.

Janet

if the kampen's have a basement, i could see someone crawling through the window..back in my younger days i crawled through my basement window while sneaking into and out of the house late at night. maybe, if they had a basement, this person lived in the basement. crawling into  a basement window would also make it much easier to break a rib, b/c i almost broke mine a few times... (not somethin i'm proud of but hey, we were all teenagers once)... again, this is alll assuming mlachester is tellin the truth so who knows


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3 7/28/09 -
Post by: sunshine12 on August 08, 2009, 10:55:01 PM
I wonder how long MBaum has known KaraK?

i believe since karak moved to mccleary in jan 09


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3 7/28/09 -
Post by: love4ever on August 08, 2009, 11:04:02 PM
I wonder how long MBaum has known KaraK?

i believe since karak moved to mccleary in jan 09

That's sad, I can not see how Karak can say that lindsey was her daughters best friend, and just for her immediate involvement via the net in my eyes was almost selfish because from her "mom who writes page" it is evident she wants attention and she could a made it big with this story. I am sorry, I am being mean right now...Is there anyone that truly genuinely cares about this child..Lindsey?

I wonder how long MBaum has known MLachester, did MBaum have anyone who truly cared about her?



Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3 7/28/09 -
Post by: love4ever on August 08, 2009, 11:06:34 PM
Did Karak and MLachester know eachother before McCleary, or did MBaum know of MLachester from Lacey?


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3 7/28/09 -
Post by: Tamikosmom on August 08, 2009, 11:08:44 PM
Could it be that the Kampen/Williams residence has a rental accommodation separate from the main house.

Janet

+++++++

Quote from: sunshine12 on July 05, 2009, 06:42:50 PM

i also am curious as to who exactly was in the kampen home the night that lindsey disappeared?


KaraK
Re: Lindsey Baum, 10y missing from McCleary, WA 6/26/09
« Reply #1163 on: July 05, 2009, 06:52:39 PM »


My house - Myself, Scott and my 4 kids.

http://scaredmonkeys.net/index.php?topic=5541.msg865334;topicseen#msg865334

I am told in a previous email that he is a  "roommate" of kara.  that sounds like same house to me.

If Kara Kampen, Scott Williams and four kids were in the house why would a roommate feel the need to crawl through a window because of a lost key.  Would ringing the door bell not suffice.  I contend that crawling through a window would cause a greater disturbance.

However ... a separate residence would make crawling through a window a logical solution.

It could be that Kara did not want to reveal illegal renting accommodations on the single family zoning property.

Janet

if the kampen's have a basement, i could see someone crawling through the window..back in my younger days i crawled through my basement window while sneaking into and out of the house late at night. maybe, if they had a basement, this person lived in the basement. crawling into  a basement window would also make it much easier to break a rib, b/c i almost broke mine a few times... (not somethin i'm proud of but hey, we were all teenagers once)... again, this is alll assuming mlachester is tellin the truth so who knows


BINGO!

However ... a basement suite could be considered a separate residence and ... Kara may not have considered the tenant as a member of her household.

Years ago we rented out a basement suite in our home.  As far as we were concerned there were two separate households under one roof.

Could it be that both Marilyn and Kara were telling the truth from their own perspectives?

Janet



Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3 7/28/09 -
Post by: doubledecker on August 08, 2009, 11:14:51 PM
no, because kara told me she never ever heard of any guy by that first name when all I had was a first name. 


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3 7/28/09 -
Post by: Tamikosmom on August 08, 2009, 11:23:18 PM
no, because kara told me she never ever heard of any guy by that first name when all I had was a first name. 

DD

Did this dialogue take place on the SM forum?

Could it be that a Kara Kampen and Scott Williams were renting an illegal suite and ... an attempt was made to conceal?

I cannot comprehend why a resident of the household would be climbing through a window unless he resided in separate accomodations.

Janet



Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3 7/28/09 -
Post by: doubledecker on August 08, 2009, 11:23:23 PM
an email to me about what marilyn told her friend
this email is in early july


 marilyn told me about roger, she knows them all well, and is good friends with roger i guess, but i don't know anything else.  she definately said that's her roommate, kara hasn't said one thing like that, i would think if he had recently moved or something marilyn would know (she knows a lot of people)  most people here do, have lived here all their lives etc.


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3 7/28/09 -
Post by: Tamikosmom on August 08, 2009, 11:25:13 PM
Good Night Monkeys!!  Good Night Zookeepers!!
Janet
8:25 PM PT


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3 7/28/09 -
Post by: doubledecker on August 08, 2009, 11:26:22 PM
no, because kara told me she never ever heard of any guy by that first name when all I had was a first name. 

DD

Did this dialogue take place on the SM forum?

Could it be that a Kara Kampen and Scott Williams were renting an illegal suite and ... an attempt was made to conceal?

I cannot comprehend why a resident of the household would be climbing through a window unless he resided in separate accomodations.

Janet



no this was not on sm.  I have been in contact with kara for some time. 

none of this makes sense.  either marilyn is lying of kara is.  you don't have someone living in a basement IF YOU EVEN HAVE A BASEMENT, and not know their name.  marilyn says she knows them all.  she calls him kara's roommate. 


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3 7/28/09 -
Post by: A_News_Junkie_Monkey on August 08, 2009, 11:33:57 PM
Snipped from DD's email exchange.

>>>it's a very subtle thing i can tell you, fine line between asbergers and asshole.  gotta run for a bit.<<<<

Sorry can't help myself.....What an ignorant comment this is.


yes I saw that, and I know because you really do know about asbergers that you would clear this up.
Not sure if one can clear up a statement such as this. I would think most people know  enough to figure out that was just a jab at this boy.


Or ignorance - my guess as she didn't know how to spell it.  http://www.aspergers.com/


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3 7/28/09 -
Post by: Tracygirl on August 08, 2009, 11:36:18 PM
What if "Roger" uses another name


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3 7/28/09 -
Post by: sunshine12 on August 08, 2009, 11:46:55 PM
Janet-

i have always believed karak is hiding something. whether thats a secret person living in her basement or something else, i'm not sure. i think what she could be hiding is something that she may not think of as a huge deal to the case but something that might hold the key to what could have happened..i'm glad someone else agrees with me about the possible basement idea. i am still trying to find something about who all was living in her home but i am driving myself crazy and can't find it. i'm beginning to think i'm nuts..lol..

i don't care that karak reads and posts on here. i find it strange. she can reply to this if she wants. i won't be suprised if she doesn't since  i publicly stated i think she might be hiding something.. but if she does, i ask that she specifically address what her relationship with mlachester is because at this point, myself and many other posters are confused.

i would also like to ask karak if she could specifically respond to the following questions:

1) did the dogs trace lindsey's scent to or from karak's house?
2) does she have a basement in her home? if so who is living there, or is it just a family room or a regular basement?
3) what type of work does her old man Scott do?
4) do the police have records of her cell phone log the night lb went missing?
5) what is her connection to mlachester?
6) why did the police not want her to be setting up whatever she was doing in relation to lindsey's disappearance?
7) any strange or suspicious neighbors that live near you?
8) how old are your children (not asking for names, just ages)
9) was there anyone in arizona you know that rubbed you the wrong way? or took a bigger interest in you or your children than they should have?



my boyfriend has this to add to my post (i just read my post outloud to him and i think he thinks im nuts):  why would this mlachester lady not call the police and report this alleged person with a broken rib living in the home of karak if she was so concerned with the welfare of lindsey?


ugh i am so confused right now i hope i didnt confuse other people i just figure we should all put whatever we are thinking out there


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3 7/28/09 -
Post by: doubledecker on August 08, 2009, 11:48:17 PM
What if "Roger" uses another name

well first marilyn says she knows them all well.  the guy is always at the bar, the people at the bar must know him by the same name marilyn knows him.  he works at a very public local place there. 

and if he was using another name around kara, I still asked her who was there and she told me her and scott and the 4 kids.  no one else, and she would have mentioned the roommate if there was one under another name,  or she is lying one.  but kara had told me so much stuff and offered info that she never had to tell me, not at all, I just can't see her denying having a roommate.  what would be the point.  why not say, yes we have a roommate, so what.  there is nothing at all wrong with having a roommate. 

so if she really has a roommate named roger then why say you don't and never heard of the guy ...

again, the police are going to have to figure this one out.


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3 7/28/09 -
Post by: doubledecker on August 08, 2009, 11:55:25 PM
Janet-

i have always believed karak is hiding something. whether thats a secret person living in her basement or something else, i'm not sure. i think what she could be hiding is something that she may not think of as a huge deal to the case but something that might hold the key to what could have happened..i'm glad someone else agrees with me about the possible basement idea. i am still trying to find something about who all was living in her home but i am driving myself crazy and can't find it. i'm beginning to think i'm nuts..lol..

i don't care that karak reads and posts on here. i find it strange. she can reply to this if she wants. i won't be suprised if she doesn't since  i publicly stated i think she might be hiding something.. but if she does, i ask that she specifically address what her relationship with mlachester is because at this point, myself and many other posters are confused.

i would also like to ask karak if she could specifically respond to the following questions:

1) did the dogs trace lindsey's scent to or from karak's house?
2) does she have a basement in her home? if so who is living there, or is it just a family room or a regular basement?
3) what type of work does her old man Scott do?
4) do the police have records of her cell phone log the night lb went missing?
5) what is her connection to mlachester?
6) why did the police not want her to be setting up whatever she was doing in relation to lindsey's disappearance?
7) any strange or suspicious neighbors that live near you?
8) how old are your children (not asking for names, just ages)
9) was there anyone in arizona you know that rubbed you the wrong way? or took a bigger interest in you or your children than they should have?



my boyfriend has this to add to my post (i just read my post outloud to him and i think he thinks im nuts):  why would this mlachester lady not call the police and report this alleged person with a broken rib living in the home of karak if she was so concerned with the welfare of lindsey?


ugh i am so confused right now i hope i didnt confuse other people i just figure we should all put whatever we are thinking out there


I agree sunshine, we all need to say what we think, maybe something will register with one of us and we go oh hmmmm, now that makes sense. 

I think though I might have given the wrong impression after I read one of your questions to kara, this one
6) why did the police not want her to be setting up whatever she was doing in relation to lindsey's disappearance?

it was not setting up anything it was her beinng in the public saying things...ugh I better just say it because this is going to get out of hand if I don't.  they did not want her posting on here.  ugh.  so see if they were trying to keep an eye on her like that poster said, they would not have told her to get off the net posting, they would have said nothing and monitored everything she said.  so I don't personally believe they were "keeping an eye" on her.


it is so hard for me to try to convey why I think the things I do and not say things I have been asked not to say.  so this is why sometimes what I do say comes off wrong or it seems like my opinions are not based on anything, it is because I can't post everything I know ugh.  if I could, this would all be so much more simple for people to understand why I say and believe what I do.


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3 7/28/09 -
Post by: doubledecker on August 09, 2009, 12:01:30 AM
sunshine, let me respond to your boyfriend's question

my boyfriend has this to add to my post (i just read my post outloud to him and i think he thinks im nuts):  why would this mlachester lady not call the police and report this alleged person with a broken rib living in the home of karak if she was so concerned with the welfare of lindsey?


because this guy is marilyn's friend.  it seems there are a LOT of people in mccleary who will not say anything against their friends or relatives.  this is something I have been told.  also that the people on drugs will not report info to the police. 


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3 7/28/09 -
Post by: Tracygirl on August 09, 2009, 12:27:15 AM
sunshine, let me respond to your boyfriend's question

my boyfriend has this to add to my post (i just read my post outloud to him and i think he thinks im nuts):  why would this mlachester lady not call the police and report this alleged person with a broken rib living in the home of karak if she was so concerned with the welfare of lindsey?


because this guy is marilyn's friend.  it seems there are a LOT of people in mccleary who will not say anything against their friends or relatives.  this is something I have been told.  also that the people on drugs will not report info to the police. 

What is the point of bringing him up in the first place if he is a friend of hers. Either way it can make a person go "hmmm, maybe he is responsible". Honestly, it is not doing the guy any favors. So why would she say he broke a rib climbing through this window at Kara's home, the place he rents? Is she trying to explain an injury he had and at the same time try to connect him to kara, just in case?
DD you do you have Kara's contact information, can you write to her and just ask? She seems like she is always willing to clear up this stuff. 



Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3 7/28/09 -
Post by: sunshine12 on August 09, 2009, 12:36:51 AM
dd-i am going to believe your sources on this case and i trust your information.  i strongly believe that the information you have regarding karak and mlachester is much more in depth than what we could verify on this forum..

yes, i find some things karak has said as odd, and i could easily see how someone could believe what mlachester says (heck, i believe bits and pieces of it..which could be stupid but oh well, i dont know what else to say at this point).. i know i feel myself going back and forth on what i think..

however; in this case, i personally choose to believe your opinion on this.  i believe you have heard both sides of the mlachester/karak situation and i know at the end of the day you have lindsey's best interest's at heart, which is all that matters i choose to believe your research, sources, hard work, and dedication to this case

we will never know why mlachester says what she says, we will never know why karak took to the web right away and started writing on forums and definitely set some poeple's "hinky meters" off... we will prob never know the true depths of the dynamic between melissa baum, kara kampen, and marilyn lachester... all we know, is that at this point, lindsey is still not home.

thank you for all your hard work dd.... i hope we get answers soon.. lindsey is fortunate to have such a kind soul such as yourself on her side.


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3 7/28/09 -
Post by: love4ever on August 09, 2009, 12:47:38 AM
dd-i am going to believe your sources on this case and i trust your information.  i strongly believe that the information you have regarding karak and mlachester is much more in depth than what we could verify on this forum..

yes, i find some things karak has said as odd, and i could easily see how someone could believe what mlachester says (heck, i believe bits and pieces of it..which could be stupid but oh well, i dont know what else to say at this point).. i know i feel myself going back and forth on what i think..

however; in this case, i personally choose to believe your opinion on this.  i believe you have heard both sides of the mlachester/karak situation and i know at the end of the day you have lindsey's best interest's at heart, which is all that matters i choose to believe your research, sources, hard work, and dedication to this case

we will never know why mlachester says what she says, we will never know why karak took to the web right away and started writing on forums and definitely set some poeple's "hinky meters" off... we will prob never know the true depths of the dynamic between melissa baum, kara kampen, and marilyn lachester... all we know, is that at this point, lindsey is still not home.

thank you for all your hard work dd.... i hope we get answers soon.. lindsey is fortunate to have such a kind soul such as yourself on her side.


You are so very sweet to recognize DD for her personal concern for Lindsey. It is very apparent the way DD selfishly extends herself in this situation. I do wish for DD to be careful in her ventures of conversations with these people. As you, I thank DD as well, and you are correct sunshine about the depth involved, DD is to be appreciated. Just to note..you also have have a kind soul sunshine ::MonkeyAngel::


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3 7/28/09 -
Post by: love4ever on August 09, 2009, 12:49:03 AM
THAT WAS SO SO SO SWEET SUNSHINE!!!!


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3 7/28/09 -
Post by: love4ever on August 09, 2009, 12:50:44 AM
dang I wish i could change the so in my post..grrrrrrrrrrrr


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3 7/28/09 -
Post by: sunshine12 on August 09, 2009, 12:52:52 AM
sunshine, let me respond to your boyfriend's question

my boyfriend has this to add to my post (i just read my post outloud to him and i think he thinks im nuts):  why would this mlachester lady not call the police and report this alleged person with a broken rib living in the home of karak if she was so concerned with the welfare of lindsey?


because this guy is marilyn's friend.  it seems there are a LOT of people in mccleary who will not say anything against their friends or relatives.  this is something I have been told.  also that the people on drugs will not report info to the police. 

What is the point of bringing him up in the first place if he is a friend of hers. Either way it can make a person go "hmmm, maybe he is responsible". Honestly, it is not doing the guy any favors. So why would she say he broke a rib climbing through this window at Kara's home, the place he rents? Is she trying to explain an injury he had and at the same time try to connect him to kara, just in case?
DD you do you have Kara's contact information, can you write to her and just ask? She seems like she is always willing to clear up this stuff. 



this is a good point..i believe there could be 3 possible answers to this depending on what you personally believe...

1) mlacheter is accurate in stating that this man lives in the home of karak and has heard that he broke his rib and is trying to offer it up as some kind of evidence. 
2) mlacheser should be put on a psychiatric hold in the hospital because of her poor perception of reality, and pathologic lies
3) the truth lies somewhere between (i know this could be seen as an easy answer but in the disappearance of lindsey it could be true)


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3 7/28/09 -
Post by: love4ever on August 09, 2009, 12:54:23 AM
I am off to bed...sweet dremas


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3 7/28/09 -
Post by: doubledecker on August 09, 2009, 01:32:25 AM
thanks sunshine, I really am not sure what I really think about this whole case.  and you are right, we might never know the extent of all of this.  I just realized something and I think I need to post something on here.  no one will understand me, but someone will, and that someone needs to get ahold of me. 

look there was a huge bank robbery back in the 1800's and a lot of people got shot up, boy was that their mistake going into a place like that, of course we all know that was none other than jesse james and the younger brothers and of course the few no one really remembers or knows who they REALLY were.  they went by the wrong name LOL  so if you grew up then you know I know, and if not well.... then just write me off as strange. 

but come on now, I see it here this way,  sometimes you just don't recognize who is who until you see their signature, then you go wow, okay, I get it. 

so lets talk. 


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3 7/28/09 -
Post by: doubledecker on August 09, 2009, 01:34:27 AM
tomorrows a nice day to fly a kite.  not too windy but a nice breeze. 


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3 7/28/09 -
Post by: pink angel on August 09, 2009, 02:58:01 AM
If this guy lived at KaraK's house and she knows that and doesn't tell police, shame on her.

I don't care if she is "friends" with him. It could be important to the investigation.

I think she is full of BS myself. She obviously has a beef with Lindsey's mom and Josh and will say anything possible to discredit them.

When it comes to a missing child or a crime and you have information or personal knowledge regarding a family or family issues, that may be useful to helping find her or may be useful in regards to the investigation, you go to police with your information, you don't go posting in on a comment section of a newspaper or you don't post it on a forum.

The police have said that Melissa Baum has passed a lie detector and they said they ruled all family members out as suspects. They rarely do this publicly. They rarely talk about if people pass lie detector tests and they rarely clear family members publicly.  They look at family first thing and they look at them HARD. FBI was involved at this time too.

This to me tells me that Melissa or Josh had no involvement in Lindsey becoming a missing person.   jmo


Quote
Police have ruled out all family members as suspects.
http://www.king5.com/localnews/stories/NW_063009WAB-Mccleary-girl-search-LJ.1fc0b759.html









Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3 7/28/09 -
Post by: pink angel on August 09, 2009, 03:01:16 AM
The she I am referring to above is "mL". just to make it clear. :)


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3 7/28/09 -
Post by: no rose colored glasses on August 09, 2009, 10:04:07 AM
dd-i am going to believe your sources on this case and i trust your information.  i strongly believe that the information you have regarding karak and mlachester is much more in depth than what we could verify on this forum..

yes, i find some things karak has said as odd, and i could easily see how someone could believe what mlachester says (heck, i believe bits and pieces of it..which could be stupid but oh well, i dont know what else to say at this point).. i know i feel myself going back and forth on what i think..

however; in this case, i personally choose to believe your opinion on this.  i believe you have heard both sides of the mlachester/karak situation and i know at the end of the day you have lindsey's best interest's at heart, which is all that matters i choose to believe your research, sources, hard work, and dedication to this case

we will never know why mlachester says what she says, we will never know why karak took to the web right away and started writing on forums and definitely set some poeple's "hinky meters" off... we will prob never know the true depths of the dynamic between melissa baum, kara kampen, and marilyn lachester... all we know, is that at this point, lindsey is still not home.

thank you for all your hard work dd.... i hope we get answers soon.. lindsey is fortunate to have such a kind soul such as yourself on her side.


You are so very sweet to recognize DD for her personal concern for Lindsey. It is very apparent the way DD selfishly extends herself in this situation. I do wish for DD to be careful in her ventures of conversations with these people. As you, I thank DD as well, and you are correct sunshine about the depth involved, DD is to be appreciated. Just to note..you also have have a kind soul sunshine ::MonkeyAngel::

I couldn't agree more, but I will add I want to thank-you as well.  ::MonkeyCool::  Sunshine, I also have concerns and questions about Kara, and you summed it up nicely in your post.


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3 7/28/09 -
Post by: KarmaRoundUp on August 09, 2009, 10:13:40 AM
so we have an 11 yr old girl missing and because of all the crap no one is looking for her, that is what I really think.  because people do not like kara or melissa or josh, and because of all the BS going on through a tiny little gossipy town, people will not help.       (Sad part is I know all about this kind of behavior, all too well what can happen in a tiny gossipy town. This is all very frustrating, and of course little Lindsey is the one suffering from this behavior. I have no idea from reading all of this who is telling the truth, but I'm sure LE has checked if there was any abuse inside Lindsey's home. One thing I can see is for whatever reason, gossip or whatever the Baum family doesn't seem to be well liked and perhaps Kara's family also, maybe because they are outsiders?)

I know what tiny little towns are like as well, I have lived in several and lived in them for many years.  it's like this.  someone moves in and crap starts if you get on one of the long time locals bad side.  you don't even have to do anything, all you need is one loudmouth local who can't stand to see someone have or do something they can't etc, and it starts.  The long time local gossips crap throughout the whole town, are believed or even if not believed the other locals jump on the bully wagon and the new person gets heck from there on out.  it's like the little clique at school who goes around bullying all the newer or weaker kids.  kara has lived there 6 months, melissa 2 yrs.  like marilyn states, she (marilyn) is well known, everyone knows who she is.  no one really knows kara and her family.  they probably don't know anything about melissa baum or josh other than josh got into it with marilyns son and he does not get along with other kids, so here comes the locals and does not like these two newer families.  so the crap starts.  and now there is something huge to rag the families about, oh they must have killed their daughter/sister, don't help them they did it, so no one helps. 

you really can't believe how the locals are treating these two families over this. 
I have heard(from people inside the case) what the locals are doing and how they are acting and treating kara and melissa etc.  it's bs... these people better realize that someone out there has lindsey and they could have their kid next.  people won't say anything against certain people, I've already been told that too.  no one will get their loved one of friends in trouble they say.  wow!  so not only point fingers at people just because you don't like them, but also don't say anything about others just because you are related or know them.  then you have all the druggies who refuse to tell the police what they know as well.  Yes, I have been told that also. 

so mccleary is full of people who need to wake up... who cares who they like etc, lindsey is a child who needs to be found and no one should get away with doing something to a child.  IF for some reason melissa baum or josh is involved, then people who really do know something need to tell the police and the police need to go check.  I am sure they have.  but all this saying blah blah blah and then when someone goes to check it out the stories keep changing, what the heck is that about?  the stories, if they are true, should not be changing.  no wonder some people say the police are rude to them, I can see why.  they were not rude to me at all, they were exceptionally nice.  I expected them to be rude, I didn't even want to contact them at all, but I could not get anyone else to because they did not have the info I had etc, and it was confusing unless you understood how it all took place, so I did it.  and all these people with all their stories need to tell the police or shut the heck up.  grrr, and if they wish to tell me anythig more, they better quit lying because at this point I don't believe them
I would think that if Josh or Melissa was involved in any way with Lindsey's disappearance,that would have come out in Melissa's polygraph.I'm sure she was asked about Josh and about abuse and the LE seem satisfied with her answers.Same with Scott Williams polygraph.Don't you all think LE asked about others in the house and other questions that would give them the truth or lies?LE also seem satisfied with Scott's poly.
After reading what DD posted above about the town,I am believing that Lindsey was taken by a SO who has friends or relatives in McCleary and the town is just not speaking this info to LE.
I hope everyone in town is investigated for these ties to SO's who more than likely live elsewhere.
After viewing MikeB's images from WS,the forests and areas are so vast that if someone did murder Lindsey,she may never be found.
:*(


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3 7/28/09 -
Post by: KarmaRoundUp on August 09, 2009, 10:17:10 AM
DD  ::MonkeyAngel::  I for one don't blame you at all for being angry, and want to thank-you again for what you are doing. The behavior coming from this town is very upsetting, I have asked and asked and don't get an answer. Are the towns people pointing fingers at one another or basically is it finger pointing just at Kara, Josh and Melissa? Are the townspeople watching their kids better, are they being more cautious, or are they letting them unsupervised because the fingers are being pointed at Kara, Josh and Melissa. And are LE telling the people in town to watch your children closer because we have a kidnapper out there?
Let's just hope that no one working within LE is related to the gossipers or involved in the town gossip trails themselves.   ::MonkeyNoNo::


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3 7/28/09 -
Post by: KarmaRoundUp on August 09, 2009, 10:18:15 AM
One question, is this Marilyn rich, or much better off then most of the folks in town?
NoRose,from the pics I saw posted on her MS,she is far from rich or better off then most.


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3 7/28/09 -
Post by: no rose colored glasses on August 09, 2009, 10:19:38 AM
Karma, I know those pics he took, well..... so many places  ::MonkeyNoNo::  I just don't know what to think with all of this now, I'm going to go on not trusting certain individuals, no not Melissa and Josh. I will say for awhile that I thought Josh had something to do with this, but after reading I realize by now LE would know and I also don't feel that a 12 year old could hide a body and not break by now. But what do I know?


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3 7/28/09 -
Post by: no rose colored glasses on August 09, 2009, 10:21:31 AM
One question, is this Marilyn rich, or much better off then most of the folks in town?
NoRose,from the pics I saw posted on her MS,she is far from rich or better off then most.
Thank-you, I just wondered because she seems to know a lot of people there, so I wondered if she was involved with many activities in the area, or if she is just nosey, sticking her nose everywhere?


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3 7/28/09 -
Post by: no rose colored glasses on August 09, 2009, 10:22:18 AM
DD  ::MonkeyAngel::  I for one don't blame you at all for being angry, and want to thank-you again for what you are doing. The behavior coming from this town is very upsetting, I have asked and asked and don't get an answer. Are the towns people pointing fingers at one another or basically is it finger pointing just at Kara, Josh and Melissa? Are the townspeople watching their kids better, are they being more cautious, or are they letting them unsupervised because the fingers are being pointed at Kara, Josh and Melissa. And are LE telling the people in town to watch your children closer because we have a kidnapper out there?
Let's just hope that no one working within LE is related to the gossipers or involved in the town gossip trails themselves.   ::MonkeyNoNo::
Yes, but being that this is a small town.....


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3 7/28/09 -
Post by: sherip on August 09, 2009, 10:23:16 AM
Could it be that the Kampen/Williams residence has a rental accommodation separate from the main house.

Janet

+++++++

Quote from: sunshine12 on July 05, 2009, 06:42:50 PM

i also am curious as to who exactly was in the kampen home the night that lindsey disappeared?


KaraK
Re: Lindsey Baum, 10y missing from McCleary, WA 6/26/09
« Reply #1163 on: July 05, 2009, 06:52:39 PM »


My house - Myself, Scott and my 4 kids.

http://scaredmonkeys.net/index.php?topic=5541.msg865334;topicseen#msg865334

I am told in a previous email that he is a  "roommate" of kara.  that sounds like same house to me.

If Kara Kampen, Scott Williams and four kids were in the house why would a roommate feel the need to crawl through a window because of a lost key.  Would ringing the door bell not suffice.  I contend that crawling through a window would cause a greater disturbance.

However ... a separate residence would make crawling through a window a logical solution.

It could be that Kara did not want to reveal illegal renting accommodations on the single family zoning property.

Janet

if the kampen's have a basement, i could see someone crawling through the window..back in my younger days i crawled through my basement window while sneaking into and out of the house late at night. maybe, if they had a basement, this person lived in the basement. crawling into  a basement window would also make it much easier to break a rib, b/c i almost broke mine a few times... (not somethin i'm proud of but hey, we were all teenagers once)... again, this is alll assuming mlachester is tellin the truth so who knows


I would think that there would be no way a person would be sneaking in or out of that resience late on the night Lindsey disappeared.  Everyone was up all night looking for her, police were at the home searching and in the neighborhood asking questions.  It would not have gone unnoticed.  It just does not make sense other than ML trying to create trouble.


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3 7/28/09 -
Post by: doubledecker on August 09, 2009, 10:43:54 AM
Good morning all;

hopefully, today I am in a better mindset.  I was blowing fuses all day yesterday and this morning I think I have my brain untwisted ugh.

I just get so tired of researching things when I find out someone on one side says this or that, then someone else says the opposite, then someone decides, oh NOW they think something else, and then you catch people in obvious lies; and it is those lies that causes me to spend days and weeks and nights with no sleep, trying to work on this stuff.  ugh. 

not only am I stressed from no sleep, but I have went down a path that had nothing to do with anything when I could have been working on something else.  And it's not only me who is going down the wrong path wasting all my time, but others help and they to are wasting their time.  ugh. 

so yes, there are days I just have no more patience and I go off!!!

so with a little sleep last night, and a fresh start this morning, maybe I can get in gear and sort through this stuff and figure out which way to go today. 

some input would be greatly appreciated as to where we go now.


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3 7/28/09 -
Post by: KarmaRoundUp on August 09, 2009, 10:50:43 AM
------------------> SNIP

KOMO News – July 2, 2009

The missing girl's mother, who wanted avoid becoming the center of the investigation, voluntarily took a polygraph test. The father of the girl's best friend, Scott Williams, also volunteered to take the test.

"At their requests polygraphs were given to them. They passed those polygraphs. We're comfortable with the information they've shared with us and comfortable with the timeline they've explained," said Grays Harbor County Undersheriff Rick Scott.

http://www.komonews.com/news/49651607.html

Playing devil's advocate or just thinking outside the box.............
http://www.fas.org/sgp/othergov/polygraph/ota/validity.html
How skilled is the LE force of 3 in McCleary?  Just asking.......

Plus, I sure wish I had seen a mother's pain from M. 
I can't help but be haunted and left wondering despite reports about even the mom.  I question her, the adults (esp those involved in rumor mill crap that is hurting efforts) and basically everyone else before Josh or any child.  IMHO a child could not have done this and got by with it this long unless one of the aforementioned was involved. 
Don't throw stones at me for thinking outside the box - only bananas! LOL

Yikes,after reading that link there goes my theory of Melissa and Scott being cleared by polys.


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3 7/28/09 -
Post by: no rose colored glasses on August 09, 2009, 10:57:30 AM
------------------> SNIP

KOMO News – July 2, 2009

The missing girl's mother, who wanted avoid becoming the center of the investigation, voluntarily took a polygraph test. The father of the girl's best friend, Scott Williams, also volunteered to take the test.

"At their requests polygraphs were given to them. They passed those polygraphs. We're comfortable with the information they've shared with us and comfortable with the timeline they've explained," said Grays Harbor County Undersheriff Rick Scott.

http://www.komonews.com/news/49651607.html

Playing devil's advocate or just thinking outside the box.............
http://www.fas.org/sgp/othergov/polygraph/ota/validity.html
How skilled is the LE force of 3 in McCleary?  Just asking.......

Plus, I sure wish I had seen a mother's pain from M. 
I can't help but be haunted and left wondering despite reports about even the mom.  I question her, the adults (esp those involved in rumor mill crap that is hurting efforts) and basically everyone else before Josh or any child.  IMHO a child could not have done this and got by with it this long unless one of the aforementioned was involved. 
Don't throw stones at me for thinking outside the box - only bananas! LOL

Yikes,after reading that link there goes my theory of Melissa and Scott being cleared by polys.
Good question, I guess that I was under the assumption the FBI gave the polys?  I don't know what to say about Melissa's reactions to things, some people just don't express very well while other are overly expressive  ::MonkeyConfused::


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3 7/28/09 -
Post by: Tamikosmom on August 09, 2009, 11:03:52 AM

I would think that there would be no way a person would be sneaking in or out of that resience late on the night Lindsey disappeared.  Everyone was up all night looking for her, police were at the home searching and in the neighborhood asking questions.  It would not have gone unnoticed.  It just does not make sense other than ML trying to create trouble.

sherip

Could all the activity have been taking place somewhere along Maple Street in an attempt to locate Lindsey at the time the Kampen/Williams tenant arrive home and found himself locked out of his separate accommodations (basement suite)?  Could this be the reason why the "break-in" went unnoticed.

Considering mlachester's details encompassing the window scenario ... I am a believer in her account.  In my opinion ... logic implies that this woman would be fabricating stories ... stories that could be so easily refuted by official sources.

On the other hand ... I do not believe that Kara was lying regarding who was present in her home when Lindsey embarked on her Maple Street journey.  Obviously ... this tenant was not home between 9:15 PM and 9:30 PM.

Janet

++++++

Quote from: sunshine12 on July 05, 2009, 06:42:50 PM

i also am curious as to who exactly was in the kampen home the night that lindsey disappeared?


KaraK
Re: Lindsey Baum, 10y missing from McCleary, WA 6/26/09
« Reply #1163 on: July 05, 2009, 06:52:39 PM »


My house - Myself, Scott and my 4 kids.

http://scaredmonkeys.net/index.php?topic=5541.msg865334;topicseen#msg865334




Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3 7/28/09 -
Post by: Tamikosmom on August 09, 2009, 11:10:46 AM
------------------> SNIP

KOMO News – July 2, 2009

The missing girl's mother, who wanted avoid becoming the center of the investigation, voluntarily took a polygraph test. The father of the girl's best friend, Scott Williams, also volunteered to take the test.

"At their requests polygraphs were given to them. They passed those polygraphs. We're comfortable with the information they've shared with us and comfortable with the timeline they've explained," said Grays Harbor County Undersheriff Rick Scott.

http://www.komonews.com/news/49651607.html

Playing devil's advocate or just thinking outside the box.............
http://www.fas.org/sgp/othergov/polygraph/ota/validity.html
How skilled is the LE force of 3 in McCleary?  Just asking.......

Plus, I sure wish I had seen a mother's pain from M. 
I can't help but be haunted and left wondering despite reports about even the mom.  I question her, the adults (esp those involved in rumor mill crap that is hurting efforts) and basically everyone else before Josh or any child.  IMHO a child could not have done this and got by with it this long unless one of the aforementioned was involved. 
Don't throw stones at me for thinking outside the box - only bananas! LOL

Yikes,after reading that link there goes my theory of Kar and Scott being cleared by polys.

Hi Karma

It must be remembered that there was a confirmed sighting shortly after 9:30 PM of Lindsey on Maple at 5th ... two blocks from her home.  This would coincide with the 9:15PM - 9:30 PM timeframe given by Kara and Scott as to when Lindsey left their home walking along Maple.

Janet


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3 7/28/09 -
Post by: A_News_Junkie_Monkey on August 09, 2009, 11:13:45 AM
------------------> SNIP

KOMO News – July 2, 2009

The missing girl's mother, who wanted avoid becoming the center of the investigation, voluntarily took a polygraph test. The father of the girl's best friend, Scott Williams, also volunteered to take the test.

"At their requests polygraphs were given to them. They passed those polygraphs. We're comfortable with the information they've shared with us and comfortable with the timeline they've explained," said Grays Harbor County Undersheriff Rick Scott.

http://www.komonews.com/news/49651607.html

Playing devil's advocate or just thinking outside the box.............
http://www.fas.org/sgp/othergov/polygraph/ota/validity.html
How skilled is the LE force of 3 in McCleary?  Just asking.......

Plus, I sure wish I had seen a mother's pain from M. 
I can't help but be haunted and left wondering despite reports about even the mom.  I question her, the adults (esp those involved in rumor mill crap that is hurting efforts) and basically everyone else before Josh or any child.  IMHO a child could not have done this and got by with it this long unless one of the aforementioned was involved. 
Don't throw stones at me for thinking outside the box - only bananas! LOL

Yikes,after reading that link there goes my theory of Melissa and Scott being cleared by polys.

My gut just never like the void - hollowness - lack of emotion from the mother.  When I get to this point, where the brain is not finding any answers I usually try to go back to my initial intuition.  Of course, my brain jumps in gives support to that starting over place.  In doing so - I have to wonder the skill level of the examiners and also the mental health of the mother (prior) to Lindsay going missing.  I wish I knew the mental health of the mother as that might give insight into the disturbing feelings I get about her from those initial videos.  JMHO of course.
btw - thanks for reading what I posted!


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3 7/28/09 -
Post by: no rose colored glasses on August 09, 2009, 11:25:40 AM
I understand what you are saying A_News_Junkie_Monkey, and believe me I'm bothered as well. Something is way off on all of this, just can't pin point it  ::MonkeyConfused::


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3 7/28/09 -
Post by: Tamikosmom on August 09, 2009, 11:31:31 AM
McCleary LE ticked Melissa Baum off as a suspect very early on in the investigation ... prior to her passing a polygraph.  Why?  Would it not make sense ... in the process of elimination ... to consider Lindsey's mother as a person of interest.

Either this LE detatchment is incompetent or ... was on to something very early on.

Janet

+++++++


Search intensifies for missing 10-year old Washington girl
KING
Published: July 1, 2009


The missing-girl’s mother said she volunteered to take a polygraph late Tuesday, wanting to clear herself - although police tell us she is not a suspect.

“I don’t want people saying oh maybe the mom got mad at her and stashed her and now saying she ran away, I don’t want anything like that. I want everyone to know my daughter is missing,” said Melissa Baum, the missing-girl’s mother.

http://www2.counton2.com/cbd/news/national/article/search_intensifies_for_missing_10-year_old_washington_girl/40240/


Expert: Missing girl likely went with someone she knew
09:58 PM PDT on Wednesday, July 1, 2009


A national expert helping in the search for 10-year-old Lindsey Baum says someone Lindsey knew might be responsible for her disappearance. Baum vanished while walking home from a friend’s house Friday around 9 p.m.

"Based on the information I have, it’s someone she possibly knows or is in the area, not outside the area," said Henry Schmidt, with the National Center for Missing and Exploited Children.

Schmidt, a retired sheriff from Wyoming, arrived in McCleary to assist with the search Sunday.

http://www.nwcn.com/statenews/washington/stories/NW_070109WAB-mccleary-KS.260ea8b9.html 




Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3 7/28/09 -
Post by: no rose colored glasses on August 09, 2009, 11:33:40 AM
I really wonder if Lindsey was getting abused at home, I'm not pointing fingers, just would really like to have that answered.


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3 7/28/09 -
Post by: A_News_Junkie_Monkey on August 09, 2009, 11:50:31 AM
I understand what you are saying A_News_Junkie_Monkey, and believe me I'm bothered as well. Something is way off on all of this, just can't pin point it  ::MonkeyConfused::
It is things like this that make my brain go off.......... http://books.google.com/books?id=6UbgUrh3StAC&pg=PA168&lpg=PA168&dq=mental+illness+%2B+polygraph&source=bl&ots=9hXP0hUSFx&sig=RdYiLInVnVmh6_z2vGaFQw7acs4&hl=en&ei=nex-Ssr6I56ntgediYTgAQ&sa=X&oi=book_result&ct=result&resnum=2#v=onepage&q=mental%20illness%20%2B%20polygraph&f=false
And the research out there - experts for and against polygraphs goes on and on and thus, why they are not admissible in court. Thus, I usually take them with a grain of salt or as a potential tool, but not gospel.


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3 7/28/09 -
Post by: A_News_Junkie_Monkey on August 09, 2009, 11:52:13 AM
I really wonder if Lindsey was getting abused at home, I'm not pointing fingers, just would really like to have that answered.

That makes two of us!  And, if the abuser or caregiver of Lindsay "felt" it was abuse.  So many variables............. grrrrrrrr


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3 7/28/09 -
Post by: A_News_Junkie_Monkey on August 09, 2009, 11:56:00 AM
OT - PINK ANGEL - can you see my post to you here:  http://scaredmonkeys.net/index.php?topic=5851.0   I am trying to keep a good list of media links but can't see some of yours. 


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3 7/28/09 -
Post by: KarmaRoundUp on August 09, 2009, 12:01:17 PM
Could it be that the Kampen/Williams residence has a rental accommodation separate from the main house.

Janet

+++++++

Quote from: sunshine12 on July 05, 2009, 06:42:50 PM

i also am curious as to who exactly was in the kampen home the night that lindsey disappeared?


KaraK
Re: Lindsey Baum, 10y missing from McCleary, WA 6/26/09
« Reply #1163 on: July 05, 2009, 06:52:39 PM »


My house - Myself, Scott and my 4 kids.

http://scaredmonkeys.net/index.php?topic=5541.msg865334;topicseen#msg865334

I am told in a previous email that he is a  "roommate" of kara.  that sounds like same house to me.

If Kara Kampen, Scott Williams and four kids were in the house why would a roommate feel the need to crawl through a window because of a lost key.  Would ringing the door bell not suffice.  I contend that crawling through a window would cause a greater disturbance.

However ... a separate residence would make crawling through a window a logical solution.

It could be that Kara did not want to reveal illegal renting accommodations on the single family zoning property.

Janet
KaraK's house looks like a single house and I didn't think it had a basement.Let me see if I have a pic of it.
No,no pic but it was shown on on a few of the media interviews.Looks more like a fabricated house with no basement.


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3 7/28/09 -
Post by: no rose colored glasses on August 09, 2009, 12:24:43 PM
I understand what you are saying A_News_Junkie_Monkey, and believe me I'm bothered as well. Something is way off on all of this, just can't pin point it  ::MonkeyConfused::
It is things like this that make my brain go off.......... http://books.google.com/books?id=6UbgUrh3StAC&pg=PA168&lpg=PA168&dq=mental+illness+%2B+polygraph&source=bl&ots=9hXP0hUSFx&sig=RdYiLInVnVmh6_z2vGaFQw7acs4&hl=en&ei=nex-Ssr6I56ntgediYTgAQ&sa=X&oi=book_result&ct=result&resnum=2#v=onepage&q=mental%20illness%20%2B%20polygraph&f=false
And the research out there - experts for and against polygraphs goes on and on and thus, why they are not admissible in court. Thus, I usually take them with a grain of salt or as a potential tool, but not gospel.
Thanks, and I agree.


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3 7/28/09 -
Post by: no rose colored glasses on August 09, 2009, 12:25:44 PM
Thanks Karma  ::MonkeyCool::


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3 7/28/09 -
Post by: KarmaRoundUp on August 09, 2009, 12:26:14 PM
Scott Williams is a truck driver.I don't know who he works for or what his schedule is,long haul/short haul.I believe he was on someones MS page as a friend but I forget who.


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3 7/28/09 -
Post by: no rose colored glasses on August 09, 2009, 12:28:44 PM
Scott Williams is a truck driver.I don't know who he works for or what his schedule is,long haul/short haul.I believe he was on someones MS page as a friend but I forget who.
Thanks  ::MonkeyCool:: 


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3 7/28/09 -
Post by: Tamikosmom on August 09, 2009, 12:52:49 PM

Karma

Could it be that the Kampen/Williams residence has a rental accommodation somewhere in the house ... somewhere on the property ... separate from the main household.

However ... if there was a boarder in the home ... It could be the following words of Kara are referring to those who were home at the time of Lindsey's departure from the residence between at 9:15 PM and 9:30 PM.  When the boarder returned home later that evening without keys ... Kara and family were not home.  They were out searching for a little girl who had not arrived home.  Thus the "break-in".

Just speculation that gives credibility to both mlachester's words and Kara's words.

Janet

+++++++

Quote from: sunshine12 on July 05, 2009, 06:42:50 PM

i also am curious as to who exactly was in the kampen home the night that lindsey disappeared?


KaraK
Re: Lindsey Baum, 10y missing from McCleary, WA 6/26/09
« Reply #1163 on: July 05, 2009, 06:52:39 PM »


My house - Myself, Scott and my 4 kids.

http://scaredmonkeys.net/index.php?topic=5541.msg865334;topicseen#msg865334


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3 7/28/09 -
Post by: no rose colored glasses on August 09, 2009, 01:01:42 PM
My house - Myself, Scott and my 4 kids.
Weird way of wording that, but maybe that is how she phrases things?


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3 7/28/09 -
Post by: doubledecker on August 09, 2009, 01:04:17 PM
for what it is worth. 

Kara says she never heard of anyone named roger, yes that is his name roger, according to ML...roger is the friend of ML... ML says roger was kara's roommate and that she knows them.

kara say she has never met ML, that she(kara) moved to mccleary about the time Marilyn moved off.  Kara knows no one named roger, and had no roommate. 

so here we are again ML vs. Kara. 

I guess the police will sort it out. 

I have roger's name he is a person, he has addresses all over washington. 

Marilyn also says he is a sweet guy and would never do anything like that. 


so hmmm, if someone is your friend and a sweet guy, why say something like oh he is kara's roommate and was there that night and broke his rib crawling through the window because he lost his keys and goes to the bar all the time.

what the heck does this have to do with anything... AND  IF   it is an out and out lie, then what REALLY is the point at all?   ::MonkeyConfused::

does someone want to get the word out there why roger has a broken rib?  or what? 



Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3 7/28/09 -
Post by: KarmaRoundUp on August 09, 2009, 01:09:42 PM
Karma, I know those pics he took, well..... so many places  ::MonkeyNoNo::  I just don't know what to think with all of this now, I'm going to go on not trusting certain individuals, no not Melissa and Josh. I will say for awhile that I thought Josh had something to do with this, but after reading I realize by now LE would know and I also don't feel that a 12 year old could hide a body and not break by now. But what do I know?
I agree,while it would be possible for Josh to be involved,with his ADHD or whatever,that could cause him not to break down but if he is involved......he had to have help from a older teen or older person.I agree the LE would have to already know this and they must have investigated it.
I just think for now I'm moving on from Melissa and Josh being involved....at least for today.


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3 7/28/09 -
Post by: mamacrazy30 on August 09, 2009, 01:13:07 PM
hurt my hand and can't really type so bear with me.  i am going to take the stance that they kk&ml are both lying about something.  i found it odd in the beginning how fast kk hopped on the board and started talking.  considering her house was the last place lindsey was scene.  one would assume that you would be considered part of the investagation.  i don't know if the police would want you talking about it over the internet.  it sounds as if the whole town is full of lies and its just trying to figure out why and what about...so now i back to watching twin peeks.


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3 7/28/09 -
Post by: no rose colored glasses on August 09, 2009, 01:24:31 PM
for what it is worth. 

Kara says she never heard of anyone named roger, yes that is his name roger, according to ML...roger is the friend of ML... ML says roger was kara's roommate and that she knows them.

kara say she has never met ML, that she(kara) moved to mccleary about the time Marilyn moved off.  Kara knows no one named roger, and had no roommate. 

so here we are again ML vs. Kara. 

I guess the police will sort it out. 

I have roger's name he is a person, he has addresses all over washington. 

Marilyn also says he is a sweet guy and would never do anything like that. 


so hmmm, if someone is your friend and a sweet guy, why say something like oh he is kara's roommate and was there that night and broke his rib crawling through the window because he lost his keys and goes to the bar all the time.

what the heck does this have to do with anything... AND  IF   it is an out and out lie, then what REALLY is the point at all?   ::MonkeyConfused::

does someone want to get the word out there why roger has a broken rib?  or what? 


Now  ::MonkeyEek:: that could be it, someone wants to get the word out about Roger's broken rib. I didn't look at it that way.


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3 7/28/09 -
Post by: no rose colored glasses on August 09, 2009, 01:26:30 PM
hurt my hand and can't really type so bear with me.  i am going to take the stance that they kk&ml are both lying about something.  i found it odd in the beginning how fast kk hopped on the board and started talking.  considering her house was the last place lindsey was scene.  one would assume that you would be considered part of the investagation.  i don't know if the police would want you talking about it over the internet.  it sounds as if the whole town is full of lies and its just trying to figure out why and what about...so now i back to watching twin peeks.
Your thoughts are my thoughts, for me that would not have been what I would have done, jump onto a forum.


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3 7/28/09 -
Post by: sunshine12 on August 09, 2009, 01:27:42 PM
i guess maybe the best thing for us all to do is to start from the beginning again with the facts....i think everyone in here is doing a good job of keeping our minds open about different theories and ideas.  it's ok for us all to change our mind everyday as to what we think could have happened to lindsey, being able to keep an open mind and explore different ideas is a gift :)

lindsey was afraid of something, as evidenced by her myspace page where she wrote that she thought something bad was going to happen... i guess the next logical question would be "is this just a coincidence that she wrote this and then went missing?" if it's not just a coincidence then i think that would point to someone she knows being involved in her disapperance, or it could be her talking about the living environment in her home (maybe she was being abused, however in the eyes of the law there's a difference between discipline and abuse, and yes parents can hit their kids as long as they dont leave marks or cause serious pain or impairment of functioning-not sayin i agree with it, but its the law). 

i could also see this case being similar to the jessica lunsford case. with a so visiting or staying with a relative temporarily in the area.

there was also the law enforcement theory, and let's not forget adam campbell



Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3 7/28/09 -
Post by: mamacrazy30 on August 09, 2009, 01:31:17 PM
hurt my hand and can't really type so bear with me.  i am going to take the stance that they kk&ml are both lying about something.  i found it odd in the beginning how fast kk hopped on the board and started talking.  considering her house was the last place lindsey was scene.  one would assume that you would be considered part of the investagation.  i don't know if the police would want you talking about it over the internet.  it sounds as if the whole town is full of lies and its just trying to figure out why and what about...so now i back to watching twin peeks.
Your thoughts are my thoughts, for me that would not have been what I would have done, jump onto a forum.
i found it odd and it actually made me look at her harder.  now maybe that could be the case to take attention off someone else and put it on her or it could have been her way of saying..hey, i couldn't have been involved here i am talking about it.  either way its hinkey. ::MonkeyConfused::


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3 7/28/09 -
Post by: mamacrazy30 on August 09, 2009, 01:32:01 PM
i guess maybe the best thing for us all to do is to start from the beginning again with the facts....i think everyone in here is doing a good job of keeping our minds open about different theories and ideas.  it's ok for us all to change our mind everyday as to what we think could have happened to lindsey, being able to keep an open mind and explore different ideas is a gift :)

lindsey was afraid of something, as evidenced by her myspace page where she wrote that she thought something bad was going to happen... i guess the next logical question would be "is this just a coincidence that she wrote this and then went missing?" if it's not just a coincidence then i think that would point to someone she knows being involved in her disapperance, or it could be her talking about the living environment in her home (maybe she was being abused, however in the eyes of the law there's a difference between discipline and abuse, and yes parents can hit their kids as long as they dont leave marks or cause serious pain or impairment of functioning-not sayin i agree with it, but its the law). 

i could also see this case being similar to the jessica lunsford case. with a so visiting or staying with a relative temporarily in the area.

there was also the law enforcement theory, and let's not forget adam campbell


thehehehe...i said that a while back and go my monkey spanked. ::MonkeyKiss::


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3 7/28/09 -
Post by: no rose colored glasses on August 09, 2009, 01:35:28 PM
i guess maybe the best thing for us all to do is to start from the beginning again with the facts....i think everyone in here is doing a good job of keeping our minds open about different theories and ideas.  it's ok for us all to change our mind everyday as to what we think could have happened to lindsey, being able to keep an open mind and explore different ideas is a gift :)

lindsey was afraid of something, as evidenced by her myspace page where she wrote that she thought something bad was going to happen... i guess the next logical question would be "is this just a coincidence that she wrote this and then went missing?" if it's not just a coincidence then i think that would point to someone she knows being involved in her disapperance, or it could be her talking about the living environment in her home (maybe she was being abused, however in the eyes of the law there's a difference between discipline and abuse, and yes parents can hit their kids as long as they dont leave marks or cause serious pain or impairment of functioning-not sayin i agree with it, but its the law). 

i could also see this case being similar to the jessica lunsford case. with a so visiting or staying with a relative temporarily in the area.

there was also the law enforcement theory, and let's not forget adam campbell


That is very upsetting to me that Lindsey was afraid something bad was going to happen, at first I thought maybe an active imagination maybe from reading or watching somekind of scary book or movie. Then I thought maybe someone in the town was making her scared, then when I read what Marilyn wrote I thought her brother. But what if it was her mom? Maybe her mom lost her temper and she was scared of that and getting into trouble? All I know is that when I first started reading about Lindsey something came over me and I was very frightened, I have never had that happen before following anyother case.


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3 7/28/09 -
Post by: sunshine12 on August 09, 2009, 01:36:26 PM
hurt my hand and can't really type so bear with me.  i am going to take the stance that they kk&ml are both lying about something.  i found it odd in the beginning how fast kk hopped on the board and started talking.  considering her house was the last place lindsey was scene.  one would assume that you would be considered part of the investagation.  i don't know if the police would want you talking about it over the internet.  it sounds as if the whole town is full of lies and its just trying to figure out why and what about...so now i back to watching twin peeks.

i hope your hand feels better :)

i think you are right about kk & ml both lying about something.  it was very strange how quickly kk got on this board. it was almost like she knew we would be dissecting her apart and so she wanted to control the information out there so she figured maybe if she joined on this board it would help protect her and her family from any really deep sleuthing on them. she was asked to stop posting on here by law enforcement. 


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3 7/28/09 -
Post by: no rose colored glasses on August 09, 2009, 01:36:51 PM
hurt my hand and can't really type so bear with me.  i am going to take the stance that they kk&ml are both lying about something.  i found it odd in the beginning how fast kk hopped on the board and started talking.  considering her house was the last place lindsey was scene.  one would assume that you would be considered part of the investagation.  i don't know if the police would want you talking about it over the internet.  it sounds as if the whole town is full of lies and its just trying to figure out why and what about...so now i back to watching twin peeks.
Your thoughts are my thoughts, for me that would not have been what I would have done, jump onto a forum.
i found it odd and it actually made me look at her harder.  now maybe that could be the case to take attention off someone else and put it on her or it could have been her way of saying..hey, i couldn't have been involved here i am talking about it.  either way its hinkey. ::MonkeyConfused::
Yes and I'm uncomfortable about that.


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3 7/28/09 -
Post by: no rose colored glasses on August 09, 2009, 01:38:41 PM
hurt my hand and can't really type so bear with me.  i am going to take the stance that they kk&ml are both lying about something.  i found it odd in the beginning how fast kk hopped on the board and started talking.  considering her house was the last place lindsey was scene.  one would assume that you would be considered part of the investagation.  i don't know if the police would want you talking about it over the internet.  it sounds as if the whole town is full of lies and its just trying to figure out why and what about...so now i back to watching twin peeks.

i hope your hand feels better :)

i think you are right about kk & ml both lying about something.  it was very strange how quickly kk got on this board. it was almost like she knew we would be dissecting her apart and so she wanted to control the information out there so she figured maybe if she joined on this board it would help protect her and her family from any really deep sleuthing on them. she was asked to stop posting on here by law enforcement. 
Since I don't know a lot about LE, would this be unusual for them to tell someone not to post on a forum?


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3 7/28/09 -
Post by: mamacrazy30 on August 09, 2009, 01:44:24 PM
i really don't know if the myspace post had anything to do with it.  i first i was really hung up on it but she also posted it in the middle of the night.  she was a young girl who loved stephen king (i did as well at her age) on the computer in the middle of the night.  who knows what else she was looking at on the internet.  she was interested in the supernatural as well--the whole 'witching hour' remark and what have you.  heck i could really go all out on a limb and say that the entire town is part of the occult and they all had a hand in lindsey's disappearance.  sometimes i actually can believe it but as of now we have no proof, the reporting was crud from the beginning and its crazy that in a town so small know one seems to have any clue as to what is going on. jmo


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3 7/28/09 -
Post by: no rose colored glasses on August 09, 2009, 01:47:07 PM
i really don't know if the myspace post had anything to do with it.  i first i was really hung up on it but she also posted it in the middle of the night.  she was a young girl who loved stephen king (i did as well at her age) on the computer in the middle of the night.  who knows what else she was looking at on the internet.  she was interested in the supernatural as well--the whole 'witching hour' remark and what have you.  heck i could really go all out on a limb and say that the entire town is part of the occult and they all had a hand in lindsey's disappearance.  sometimes i actually can believe it but as of now we have no proof, the reporting was crud from the beginning and its crazy that in a town so small know one seems to have any clue as to what is going on. jmo
Or they do and they are keeping their mouths shut for selfish reasons.


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3 7/28/09 -
Post by: mamacrazy30 on August 09, 2009, 01:51:03 PM
hurt my hand and can't really type so bear with me.  i am going to take the stance that they kk&ml are both lying about something.  i found it odd in the beginning how fast kk hopped on the board and started talking.  considering her house was the last place lindsey was scene.  one would assume that you would be considered part of the investagation.  i don't know if the police would want you talking about it over the internet.  it sounds as if the whole town is full of lies and its just trying to figure out why and what about...so now i back to watching twin peeks.

i hope your hand feels better :)

i think you are right about kk & ml both lying about something.  it was very strange how quickly kk got on this board. it was almost like she knew we would be dissecting her apart and so she wanted to control the information out there so she figured maybe if she joined on this board it would help protect her and her family from any really deep sleuthing on them. she was asked to stop posting on here by law enforcement. 
Since I don't know a lot about LE, would this be unusual for them to tell someone not to post on a forum?
i don't think so..as it is still an active investagation she should have only given info to them imo and not the whole darn internet...what if they had mentioned something to her that only people close to the case should know and while getting worked up she blabed it to us.  what if the person really involved was reading and go a ah ha moment and did whatever.  i just don't think it was very wise.


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3 7/28/09 -
Post by: KarmaRoundUp on August 09, 2009, 01:54:38 PM
One question, is this Marilyn rich, or much better off then most of the folks in town?
NoRose,from the pics I saw posted on her MS,she is far from rich or better off then most.
Thank-you, I just wondered because she seems to know a lot of people there, so I wondered if she was involved with many activities in the area, or if she is just nosey, sticking her nose everywhere?
I'm not sure but someone at WS said they saw pics of her and her kids at a rainy Easter egg hunt at one of the churches there but I saw those pics and didn't notice her there.I have no idea how involved she is in the town of McCleary but I do know if my house looked as dirty and cluttered as her house looked I sure wouldn't be putting those pics up on MS.LOL...petty I know.
From her MS most of the adults(her and her hubby included)looked kinda rough to me.
http://www.myspace.com/batchessqua

pics here:

http://viewmorepics.myspace.com/index.cfm?fuseaction=user.viewAlbums&friendID=47138410



Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3 7/28/09 -
Post by: Sister on August 09, 2009, 01:57:33 PM
No rose, it is not unusual for LE to ask people not to talk on forums, because unfortunately they can be a source of rumors and/or information that may aid an abductor.
What difference would it make to anyone if KK was renting a room to someone?  KK says she doesn't even know this person, but not only does ML say she knows him, is friends, but what a sweet person he is and his broken rib wouldn't have anything to do with Lindsey being missing.  Why even mention the rib or him either?
ML seems to know so much now, but she doesn't even live in town anymore. How is that?  Why are we taking her comments at face value, but folks tore KK up one side and then down the other from what time the sun went down, to letting Lindsey walk home alone, etc etc etc?
Who benefits the most from lying?  Well, that depends on your motive.  If you're out for revenge or to cause trouble, if you want to stir the pot, if you want people to look one way instead of another, then that's a motive.
If you want people to think better of imperfect individuals (and ain't we all) involved, including the children, that is a motive for lying.
To say MB hasn't shown enough emotion may be an accurate observation, but I also remember Susan Smith and all her tears which were all an act, false accusations, etc.
To bring Lindsey home, which liar (if they both are) has hindered, caused more harm, etc.  To me, the answer is clear.  But, what do I know?  I live 3,000 miles away.  But I believe some have put their trust in the wrong place and will have to eat their "I told you so banana" -- yet, that could be me.


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3 7/28/09 -
Post by: KarmaRoundUp on August 09, 2009, 02:02:47 PM
------------------> SNIP

KOMO News – July 2, 2009

The missing girl's mother, who wanted avoid becoming the center of the investigation, voluntarily took a polygraph test. The father of the girl's best friend, Scott Williams, also volunteered to take the test.

"At their requests polygraphs were given to them. They passed those polygraphs. We're comfortable with the information they've shared with us and comfortable with the timeline they've explained," said Grays Harbor County Undersheriff Rick Scott.

http://www.komonews.com/news/49651607.html

Playing devil's advocate or just thinking outside the box.............
http://www.fas.org/sgp/othergov/polygraph/ota/validity.html
How skilled is the LE force of 3 in McCleary?  Just asking.......

Plus, I sure wish I had seen a mother's pain from M. 
I can't help but be haunted and left wondering despite reports about even the mom.  I question her, the adults (esp those involved in rumor mill crap that is hurting efforts) and basically everyone else before Josh or any child.  IMHO a child could not have done this and got by with it this long unless one of the aforementioned was involved. 
Don't throw stones at me for thinking outside the box - only bananas! LOL

Yikes,after reading that link there goes my theory of Kar and Scott being cleared by polys.

Hi Karma

It must be remembered that there was a confirmed sighting shortly after 9:30 PM of Lindsey on Maple at 5th ... two blocks from her home.  This would coincide with the 9:15PM - 9:30 PM timeframe given by Kara and Scott as to when Lindsey left their home walking along Maple.

Janet
::MonkeyConfused::  Hi Janet
Now I'm wondering if these 2 witnesses that claim they saw Lindsey on Maple.....have been investigated and polygraphed.I swear this is all so complicated.


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3 7/28/09 -
Post by: mamacrazy30 on August 09, 2009, 02:02:59 PM
iirc the median income for the town is around $30,000 if not less.  iirc the white house that caused me so much trouble was selling for around $50,000..so what exactly would 'well off' in that town be?  and although i agree her and hubs look a little rough they pretty much look like everyone else in the town from the pictures i've seen.


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3 7/28/09 -
Post by: KarmaRoundUp on August 09, 2009, 02:04:57 PM
------------------> SNIP

KOMO News – July 2, 2009

The missing girl's mother, who wanted avoid becoming the center of the investigation, voluntarily took a polygraph test. The father of the girl's best friend, Scott Williams, also volunteered to take the test.

"At their requests polygraphs were given to them. They passed those polygraphs. We're comfortable with the information they've shared with us and comfortable with the timeline they've explained," said Grays Harbor County Undersheriff Rick Scott.

http://www.komonews.com/news/49651607.html

Playing devil's advocate or just thinking outside the box.............
http://www.fas.org/sgp/othergov/polygraph/ota/validity.html
How skilled is the LE force of 3 in McCleary?  Just asking.......

Plus, I sure wish I had seen a mother's pain from M. 
I can't help but be haunted and left wondering despite reports about even the mom.  I question her, the adults (esp those involved in rumor mill crap that is hurting efforts) and basically everyone else before Josh or any child.  IMHO a child could not have done this and got by with it this long unless one of the aforementioned was involved. 
Don't throw stones at me for thinking outside the box - only bananas! LOL

Yikes,after reading that link there goes my theory of Melissa and Scott being cleared by polys.

My gut just never like the void - hollowness - lack of emotion from the mother.  When I get to this point, where the brain is not finding any answers I usually try to go back to my initial intuition.  Of course, my brain jumps in gives support to that starting over place.  In doing so - I have to wonder the skill level of the examiners and also the mental health of the mother (prior) to Lindsay going missing.  I wish I knew the mental health of the mother as that might give insight into the disturbing feelings I get about her from those initial videos.  JMHO of course.
btw - thanks for reading what I posted!
I always read what you post NewsJunkie    ::MonkeyWink::
I guess poly's are just like search dogs....it's all in the training and how they are able to extract useful info.....or not.


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3 7/28/09 -
Post by: KarmaRoundUp on August 09, 2009, 02:06:44 PM
I really wonder if Lindsey was getting abused at home, I'm not pointing fingers, just would really like to have that answered.
I would like to know that for sure and much more.


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3 7/28/09 -
Post by: KarmaRoundUp on August 09, 2009, 02:08:11 PM
I understand what you are saying A_News_Junkie_Monkey, and believe me I'm bothered as well. Something is way off on all of this, just can't pin point it  ::MonkeyConfused::
It is things like this that make my brain go off.......... http://books.google.com/books?id=6UbgUrh3StAC&pg=PA168&lpg=PA168&dq=mental+illness+%2B+polygraph&source=bl&ots=9hXP0hUSFx&sig=RdYiLInVnVmh6_z2vGaFQw7acs4&hl=en&ei=nex-Ssr6I56ntgediYTgAQ&sa=X&oi=book_result&ct=result&resnum=2#v=onepage&q=mental%20illness%20%2B%20polygraph&f=false
And the research out there - experts for and against polygraphs goes on and on and thus, why they are not admissible in court. Thus, I usually take them with a grain of salt or as a potential tool, but not gospel.
I agree,poly's are only meant to be an investigative tool and I'm guessing the better trained the poly giver is,the better info that comes out.


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3 7/28/09 -
Post by: KarmaRoundUp on August 09, 2009, 02:09:40 PM
Thanks Karma  ::MonkeyCool::
You're welcome NoRose.    ::MonkeyCool::


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3 7/28/09 -
Post by: Tracygirl on August 09, 2009, 02:11:58 PM
The camera's are not following the mother around 24/7. People are different and everyone shows emotions differently. Sandra's mom couldn't produce words she was so emotional, Tori's mom didn't share more then 10 tears with the public. Both moms are innocent....

No one feels Marilyn L is lying and hampering the progress of the investigation? Interesting.....


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3 7/28/09 -
Post by: KarmaRoundUp on August 09, 2009, 02:12:06 PM

Karma

Could it be that the Kampen/Williams residence has a rental accommodation somewhere in the house ... somewhere on the property ... separate from the main household.

However ... if there was a boarder in the home ... It could be the following words of Kara are referring to those who were home at the time of Lindsey's departure from the residence between at 9:15 PM and 9:30 PM.  When the boarder returned home later that evening without keys ... Kara and family were not home.  They were out searching for a little girl who had not arrived home.  Thus the "break-in".

Just speculation that gives credibility to both mlachester's words and Kara's words.

Janet

+++++++

Quote from: sunshine12 on July 05, 2009, 06:42:50 PM

i also am curious as to who exactly was in the kampen home the night that lindsey disappeared?


KaraK
Re: Lindsey Baum, 10y missing from McCleary, WA 6/26/09
« Reply #1163 on: July 05, 2009, 06:52:39 PM »


My house - Myself, Scott and my 4 kids.

http://scaredmonkeys.net/index.php?topic=5541.msg865334;topicseen#msg865334

That is possible.They could have an extra room that they rented out....or there could be a finished basement to the house that was rented out to bring extra monies into the household.


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3 7/28/09 -
Post by: KarmaRoundUp on August 09, 2009, 02:14:50 PM
My house - Myself, Scott and my 4 kids.
Weird way of wording that, but maybe that is how she phrases things?
This may be taken out of context,I think KaraK was answering a string of questions and she just directly answered the question of who was in her home.Let me go see.....


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3 7/28/09 -
Post by: mamacrazy30 on August 09, 2009, 02:17:38 PM
The camera's are not following the mother around 24/7. People are different and everyone shows emotions differently. Sandra's mom couldn't produce words she was so emotional, Tori's mom didn't share more then 10 tears with the public. Both moms are innocent....

No one feels Marilyn L is lying and hampering the progress of the investigation? Interesting.....
i think she could be but i this point i think they (the entire town) could be lying.  i have twisted my brain around this so many times going through every one is a suspect.  heck, at one time i was wondering if it wasn't an abduction, maybe some drunk ran over her and tossed her body in the back of their rig, and dumped it somewhere.


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3 7/28/09 -
Post by: KarmaRoundUp on August 09, 2009, 02:17:54 PM
My house - Myself, Scott and my 4 kids.
Weird way of wording that, but maybe that is how she phrases things?
Quote
Quote from: sunshine12 on July 05, 2009, 03:42:50 PM
http://freelancersstartingplace.blogspot.com/2009/06/missing-10-year-old-girl-in-mccleary-wa.html

i dont know if i am allowed to post this in here, but i know that kara does blog for a living or something along those lines and was wondering if she got paid to write the above blog. just curious.

i also am curious as to who exactly was in the kampen home the night that lindsey disappeared?

another question...could it be possible for lindsey to have spoke by phone w/someone that she planned to meet up with, maybe an older boy or something and then met him on the way home maybe he drives, picked her up on her route home and things went horribly wrong?

Quote
KaraK wrote:
No I didn't get paid to write the above blog. I did that merely to try and get her pic and name out. I am not sure if there is a way to check it but I am only an infrequent blogger. I've also written 2 other articles that went up for no upfront and display only and I will most likely put up more articles if there is any new updates, leads or most likely even if nothing is found.

My house - Myself, Scott and my 4 kids.

Police have had her cell phone since the first day and my phone was charging at the time in the kitchen where she never went. Not sure if they checked her house phone or not - we don't have a regular house phone though here.


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3 7/28/09 -
Post by: sunshine12 on August 09, 2009, 02:22:00 PM
No rose, it is not unusual for LE to ask people not to talk on forums, because unfortunately they can be a source of rumors and/or information that may aid an abductor.
What difference would it make to anyone if KK was renting a room to someone?  KK says she doesn't even know this person, but not only does ML say she knows him, is friends, but what a sweet person he is and his broken rib wouldn't have anything to do with Lindsey being missing.  Why even mention the rib or him either?
ML seems to know so much now, but she doesn't even live in town anymore. How is that?  Why are we taking her comments at face value, but folks tore KK up one side and then down the other from what time the sun went down, to letting Lindsey walk home alone, etc etc etc?
Who benefits the most from lying?  Well, that depends on your motive.  If you're out for revenge or to cause trouble, if you want to stir the pot, if you want people to look one way instead of another, then that's a motive.
If you want people to think better of imperfect individuals (and ain't we all) involved, including the children, that is a motive for lying.
To say MB hasn't shown enough emotion may be an accurate observation, but I also remember Susan Smith and all her tears which were all an act, false accusations, etc.
To bring Lindsey home, which liar (if they both are) has hindered, caused more harm, etc.  To me, the answer is clear.  But, what do I know?  I live 3,000 miles away.  But I believe some have put their trust in the wrong place and will have to eat their "I told you so banana" -- yet, that could be me.

i dont think its about who is right and who is wrong. this is about finding lindsey.  if information is put on a forum about someone else living in karak's house of course people are gonna ask questions about it.   


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3 7/28/09 -
Post by: Tracygirl on August 09, 2009, 02:27:05 PM
Asking questions and putting trust are two different things.


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3 7/28/09 -
Post by: Sister on August 09, 2009, 02:28:45 PM
Karma, I think KaraK is telling the truth about who lives in her house.  The only one who says otherwise is ML and she's not even living in town.  It makes no sense that KK would lie about something like that as it would be easy enough for LE or others to know if that was or wasn't the truth.


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3 7/28/09 -
Post by: sunshine12 on August 09, 2009, 02:35:43 PM
Asking questions and putting trust are two different things.

yes and i'm personally putting my trust into the theory that mlachester has lied about certain things and is stirring the pot, possibly making her lies fit the scenario that she believes happened to lindsey baum, or to divert attention onto the people she feels should have protected lindsey that night by walking her home (the Kampens).

as for her report to cps, we will never be able to verify this unless it comes out in trial.

i believe we have a poster here working on getting the 911 records to verify if she called 911 for lindsey from her home before.


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3 7/28/09 -
Post by: love4ever on August 09, 2009, 02:36:36 PM
This address gets me...904 West Simpson #6 McCleary, WA 98557...since I have no sense of geographical direction would this be going up the hill on 6th from Maple st?

And when did the lachester's live at this address?


Festus Lachester III 904 West Simpson #6 McCleary, WA 98557 Marilyn A. Lachester 904 West Simpson #6 McCleary, WA 98557


I would still like to know when they lived here?


http://**/archives/20nov08/legals1.html


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3 7/28/09 -
Post by: mamacrazy30 on August 09, 2009, 02:38:04 PM
Asking questions and putting trust are two different things.

yes and i'm personally putting my trust into the theory that mlachester has lied about certain things and is stirring the pot, possibly making her lies fit the scenario that she believes happened to lindsey baum, or to divert attention onto the people she feels should have protected lindsey that night by walking her home (the Kampens).

as for her report to cps, we will never be able to verify this unless it comes out in trial.

i believe we have a poster here working on getting the 911 records to verify if she called 911 for lindsey from her home before.
that would be great (if someone could get the 911 records)  it would really help to clear some of this up


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3 7/28/09 -
Post by: mamacrazy30 on August 09, 2009, 02:41:14 PM
does anybody remember who the person who saw lindsey walking ( while they were either going to work or coming home can't remember witch, but y'all know who i'm talking about.  does anyone remember a name?


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3 7/28/09 -
Post by: Tracygirl on August 09, 2009, 02:42:55 PM
Asking questions and putting trust are two different things.

yes and i'm personally putting my trust into the theory that mlachester has lied about certain things and is stirring the pot, possibly making her lies fit the scenario that she believes happened to lindsey baum, or to divert attention onto the people she feels should have protected lindsey that night by walking her home (the Kampens).
as for her report to cps, we will never be able to verify this unless it comes out in trial.

i believe we have a poster here working on getting the 911 records to verify if she called 911 for lindsey from her home before.

 ::MonkeyWink::
Yes I agree with you...Why is she doing this?









Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3 7/28/09 -
Post by: KarmaRoundUp on August 09, 2009, 02:44:22 PM
Karma, I think KaraK is telling the truth about who lives in her house.  The only one who says otherwise is ML and she's not even living in town.  It makes no sense that KK would lie about something like that as it would be easy enough for LE or others to know if that was or wasn't the truth.
Sister,I'm at the point now where I believe maybe half of what everyone says.I do believe that Melissa is being truthful,I don't believe she has lied about Lindsey's disappearance.I believe Melissa is hurting but still I don't know some answers pertaining to Melissa....like was she dating someone/s?Could that person have anything to do with this case?Maybe an ex?
I am full of questions for everyone but I don't think Melissa is hiding anything.I think it's a possibility that Melissa may know someone but not know that this person is involved.KWIM?
I also think this case is much bigger than just McCleary.Melissa grew up in Lacey,Melissa and sometimes Lindsey worked in Elma.

In a perfect world everyone who ever had any contact with Lindsey(teachers,coaches,Mom's boyfriends,customers from the dollar store in Elma,pastors,preachers,doctors,nurses,police,friends,friends families,friends of friends,every SO and their families/friends on and on)
would ALL be investigated.


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3 7/28/09 -
Post by: no rose colored glasses on August 09, 2009, 02:44:55 PM
One question, is this Marilyn rich, or much better off then most of the folks in town?
NoRose,from the pics I saw posted on her MS,she is far from rich or better off then most.
Thank-you, I just wondered because she seems to know a lot of people there, so I wondered if she was involved with many activities in the area, or if she is just nosey, sticking her nose everywhere?
I'm not sure but someone at WS said they saw pics of her and her kids at a rainy Easter egg hunt at one of the churches there but I saw those pics and didn't notice her there.I have no idea how involved she is in the town of McCleary but I do know if my house looked as dirty and cluttered as her house looked I sure wouldn't be putting those pics up on MS.LOL...petty I know.
From her MS most of the adults(her and her hubby included)looked kinda rough to me.
http://www.myspace.com/batchessqua

pics here:

http://viewmorepics.myspace.com/index.cfm?fuseaction=user.viewAlbums&friendID=47138410


I agree with you, and I also will say and this is my opinion but I can see a little craziness in her eyes  ::MonkeyEek::


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3 7/28/09 -
Post by: KarmaRoundUp on August 09, 2009, 02:46:56 PM
This address gets me...904 West Simpson #6 McCleary, WA 98557...since I have no sense of geographical direction would this be going up the hill on 6th from Maple st?

And when did the lachester's live at this address?


Festus Lachester III 904 West Simpson #6 McCleary, WA 98557 Marilyn A. Lachester 904 West Simpson #6 McCleary, WA 98557


I would still like to know when they lived here?


http://**/archives/20nov08/legals1.html
When I read all of that I got the impression they lived there while their house was being forclosed last year.


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3 7/28/09 -
Post by: no rose colored glasses on August 09, 2009, 02:47:59 PM
No rose, it is not unusual for LE to ask people not to talk on forums, because unfortunately they can be a source of rumors and/or information that may aid an abductor.
What difference would it make to anyone if KK was renting a room to someone?  KK says she doesn't even know this person, but not only does ML say she knows him, is friends, but what a sweet person he is and his broken rib wouldn't have anything to do with Lindsey being missing.  Why even mention the rib or him either?
ML seems to know so much now, but she doesn't even live in town anymore. How is that?  Why are we taking her comments at face value, but folks tore KK up one side and then down the other from what time the sun went down, to letting Lindsey walk home alone, etc etc etc?
Who benefits the most from lying?  Well, that depends on your motive.  If you're out for revenge or to cause trouble, if you want to stir the pot, if you want people to look one way instead of another, then that's a motive.
If you want people to think better of imperfect individuals (and ain't we all) involved, including the children, that is a motive for lying.
To say MB hasn't shown enough emotion may be an accurate observation, but I also remember Susan Smith and all her tears which were all an act, false accusations, etc.
To bring Lindsey home, which liar (if they both are) has hindered, caused more harm, etc.  To me, the answer is clear.  But, what do I know?  I live 3,000 miles away.  But I believe some have put their trust in the wrong place and will have to eat their "I told you so banana" -- yet, that could be me.
Thanks, I think it would be best for a person like Kara who was one of the last people to see Lindsey not to be on a forum, she could say stuff that isn't appropriate. I don't know who is lying or why they are lying, it just seems so petty and stupid too me.


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3 7/28/09 -
Post by: mamacrazy30 on August 09, 2009, 02:48:34 PM
does anybody remember who the person who saw lindsey walking ( while they were either going to work or coming home can't remember witch, but y'all know who i'm talking about.  does anyone remember a name?
was it ml?


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3 7/28/09 -
Post by: KarmaRoundUp on August 09, 2009, 02:50:56 PM
One question, is this Marilyn rich, or much better off then most of the folks in town?
NoRose,from the pics I saw posted on her MS,she is far from rich or better off then most.
Thank-you, I just wondered because she seems to know a lot of people there, so I wondered if she was involved with many activities in the area, or if she is just nosey, sticking her nose everywhere?
I'm not sure but someone at WS said they saw pics of her and her kids at a rainy Easter egg hunt at one of the churches there but I saw those pics and didn't notice her there.I have no idea how involved she is in the town of McCleary but I do know if my house looked as dirty and cluttered as her house looked I sure wouldn't be putting those pics up on MS.LOL...petty I know.
From her MS most of the adults(her and her hubby included)looked kinda rough to me.
http://www.myspace.com/batchessqua

pics here:

http://viewmorepics.myspace.com/index.cfm?fuseaction=user.viewAlbums&friendID=47138410


I agree with you, and I also will say and this is my opinion but I can see a little craziness in her eyes  ::MonkeyEek::
I agree


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3 7/28/09 -
Post by: no rose colored glasses on August 09, 2009, 02:51:48 PM
The camera's are not following the mother around 24/7. People are different and everyone shows emotions differently. Sandra's mom couldn't produce words she was so emotional, Tori's mom didn't share more then 10 tears with the public. Both moms are innocent....

No one feels Marilyn L is lying and hampering the progress of the investigation? Interesting.....
I said before, we don't know Melissa and maybe that is how she reacts to horrible situations. I think there are lies from Marilyn and Kara but that's me. What lies and why I really don't know, but I guess someone is lying for sure about this guy Roger  ::MonkeyConfused::


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3 7/28/09 -
Post by: love4ever on August 09, 2009, 02:53:49 PM
904 West Simpson #6 McCleary, WA 98557

(http://img185.imageshack.us/img185/7165/image1s.jpg) (http://img185.imageshack.us/i/image1s.jpg/)


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3 7/28/09 -
Post by: love4ever on August 09, 2009, 02:54:59 PM
ooops..LOL


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3 7/28/09 -
Post by: sunshine12 on August 09, 2009, 02:55:47 PM
Asking questions and putting trust are two different things.

yes and i'm personally putting my trust into the theory that mlachester has lied about certain things and is stirring the pot, possibly making her lies fit the scenario that she believes happened to lindsey baum, or to divert attention onto the people she feels should have protected lindsey that night by walking her home (the Kampens).
as for her report to cps, we will never be able to verify this unless it comes out in trial.

i believe we have a poster here working on getting the 911 records to verify if she called 911 for lindsey from her home before.

 ::MonkeyWink::
Yes I agree with you...Why is she doing this?









ahhh tracygirl, great question,i think part of the reason people do at least look into the claims she makes is because "why would someone want to do this or want to say these things if they arent true?"  i do believe that mlachester and lindsey's mother have some back history between them and i do believe mlachester thinks lindsey was being abused in the house. i dont doubt that she did call cps.   as to why she's doing this...maybe in her brain she think its in lindsey's best interest, who knows, i think we might need a psychologist to answer the question as to why she's doing this  ::MonkeyNoNo::


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3 7/28/09 -
Post by: doubledecker on August 09, 2009, 02:55:59 PM
i really don't know if the myspace post had anything to do with it.  i first i was really hung up on it but she also posted it in the middle of the night.  she was a young girl who loved stephen king (i did as well at her age) on the computer in the middle of the night.  who knows what else she was looking at on the internet.  she was interested in the supernatural as well--the whole 'witching hour' remark and what have you.  heck i could really go all out on a limb and say that the entire town is part of the occult and they all had a hand in lindsey's disappearance.  sometimes i actually can believe it but as of now we have no proof, the reporting was crud from the beginning and its crazy that in a town so small know one seems to have any clue as to what is going on. jmo
Or they do and they are keeping their mouths shut for selfish reasons.

I believe there are people who know things and they are not going to say.  They certainly are not going to tell the police.  if I were the cops I would plant someone down in that bar, undercover and just listen to the drunks and tweakers.  seriously, that is exactly what I would do.  get one of those tweakers on a dope charge and make a deal with them to go listen in that bar.  you would be supprised what they would hear.


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3 7/28/09 -
Post by: KarmaRoundUp on August 09, 2009, 02:59:05 PM
does anybody remember who the person who saw lindsey walking ( while they were either going to work or coming home can't remember witch, but y'all know who i'm talking about.  does anyone remember a name?
was it ml?
MamaC,as far as I know they never stated the name for any witnesses.I'm still confused on the witnesses to tell you the truth.

Witness 1~broke up the fight with Josh and Lindsey and sent Josh home.Also so Lindsey walking on Maple.Said to be a friend of the family.
Did LE say witness #1 was the one who saw Lindsey on the way to her job,she worked for another county?

Witness 2~came forth the tuesday after Lindsey went missing(on a friday)and said she saw Lindsey walking on Maple also.

Later,Melissa said one of these witnesses she knew very well and she works with her.Does anyone know which witness Melissa knows and works with?
So does Melissa work for another County because I thought she worked at the Elma dollar store that her friend Melissa McCann runs?


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3 7/28/09 -
Post by: KarmaRoundUp on August 09, 2009, 03:02:28 PM
904 West Simpson #6 McCleary, WA 98557

(http://img185.imageshack.us/img185/7165/image1s.jpg) (http://img185.imageshack.us/i/image1s.jpg/)
I tried to post this earlier but I don't remember seeing it posted?Anyway.....
This is section 8 mobile homes but I don't think they are there any more.


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3 7/28/09 -
Post by: mamacrazy30 on August 09, 2009, 03:04:46 PM
i really don't know if the myspace post had anything to do with it.  i first i was really hung up on it but she also posted it in the middle of the night.  she was a young girl who loved stephen king (i did as well at her age) on the computer in the middle of the night.  who knows what else she was looking at on the internet.  she was interested in the supernatural as well--the whole 'witching hour' remark and what have you.  heck i could really go all out on a limb and say that the entire town is part of the occult and they all had a hand in lindsey's disappearance.  sometimes i actually can believe it but as of now we have no proof, the reporting was crud from the beginning and its crazy that in a town so small know one seems to have any clue as to what is going on. jmo
Or they do and they are keeping their mouths shut for selfish reasons.

I believe there are people who know things and they are not going to say.  They certainly are not going to tell the police.  if I were the cops I would plant someone down in that bar, undercover and just listen to the drunks and tweakers.  seriously, that is exactly what I would do.  get one of those tweakers on a dope charge and make a deal with them to go listen in that bar.  you would be supprised what they would hear.
well if i go by my own theory (that i don't post or y'all would really think i'm off my rocker) lindsey was fairly new to the town and because everyone knows everyone a new comer form out of state would be good choice and considering her family had no close ties around.  really who does lindseys mom have to comfort her other than kk and she hasn't lived there very long either.


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3 7/28/09 -
Post by: no rose colored glasses on August 09, 2009, 03:07:00 PM
does anybody remember who the person who saw lindsey walking ( while they were either going to work or coming home can't remember witch, but y'all know who i'm talking about.  does anyone remember a name?
was it ml?
I don't believe a name was ever given.


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3 7/28/09 -
Post by: pink angel on August 09, 2009, 03:08:30 PM
Asking questions and putting trust are two different things.

yes and i'm personally putting my trust into the theory that mlachester has lied about certain things and is stirring the pot, possibly making her lies fit the scenario that she believes happened to lindsey baum, or to divert attention onto the people she feels should have protected lindsey that night by walking her home (the Kampens).
as for her report to cps, we will never be able to verify this unless it comes out in trial.

i believe we have a poster here working on getting the 911 records to verify if she called 911 for lindsey from her home before.

 ::MonkeyWink::
Yes I agree with you...Why is she doing this?









You'd be surprised how many people "insert" themselves into missing person cases, just to get attention. Positive, negative matters not. They just want attention.

If your posting in a comment section of a newspaper RATHER than calling LE immediately and reporting what you know, you are clearly seeking attention.

She obviously has a bone with Melissa and Josh. Her son has gotten into with Josh. She could be making up all this crap about Lindsey running to her for "help". Just to make Melissa look like a bad mom and Josh look like an abusive brother.

jmo


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3 7/28/09 -
Post by: mamacrazy30 on August 09, 2009, 03:09:40 PM
does anybody remember who the person who saw lindsey walking ( while they were either going to work or coming home can't remember witch, but y'all know who i'm talking about.  does anyone remember a name?
was it ml?
MamaC,as far as I know they never stated the name for any witnesses.I'm still confused on the witnesses to tell you the truth.

Witness 1~broke up the fight with Josh and Lindsey and sent Josh home.Also so Lindsey walking on Maple.Said to be a friend of the family.
Did LE say witness #1 was the one who saw Lindsey on the way to her job,she worked for another county?

Witness 2~came forth the tuesday after Lindsey went missing(on a friday)and said she saw Lindsey walking on Maple also.

Later,Melissa said one of these witnesses she knew very well and she works with her.Does anyone know which witness Melissa knows and works with?
So does Melissa work for another County because I thought she worked at the Elma dollar store that her friend Melissa McCann runs?

do to the bad reporting i wonder if witness 1 and 2 are the same person?  i'm getting confusseled because i thought that at one time i read that ml was the person that broke up the fight?  i don't know where i'm getting that from but?  or maybe it was her call le when lindsey came over?   ::MonkeyConfused::


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3 7/28/09 -
Post by: KarmaRoundUp on August 09, 2009, 03:10:23 PM
There is also the Evergreen apartments at 907 W Simpson RD.



Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3 7/28/09 -
Post by: pink angel on August 09, 2009, 03:11:40 PM
does anybody remember who the person who saw lindsey walking ( while they were either going to work or coming home can't remember witch, but y'all know who i'm talking about.  does anyone remember a name?
was it ml?
No. Neither of the persons (there was 2) were named.


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3 7/28/09 -
Post by: mamacrazy30 on August 09, 2009, 03:15:31 PM
does anybody remember who the person who saw lindsey walking ( while they were either going to work or coming home can't remember witch, but y'all know who i'm talking about.  does anyone remember a name?
was it ml?
No. Neither of the persons (there was 2) were named.
i wonder why not?  and i wonder if ????  have they talked to anyone it town?  i just wonder about the witnesses  ::MonkeyConfused::


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3 7/28/09 -
Post by: KarmaRoundUp on August 09, 2009, 03:19:26 PM
does anybody remember who the person who saw lindsey walking ( while they were either going to work or coming home can't remember witch, but y'all know who i'm talking about.  does anyone remember a name?
was it ml?
MamaC,as far as I know they never stated the name for any witnesses.I'm still confused on the witnesses to tell you the truth.

Witness 1~broke up the fight with Josh and Lindsey and sent Josh home.Also so Lindsey walking on Maple.Said to be a friend of the family.
Did LE say witness #1 was the one who saw Lindsey on the way to her job,she worked for another county?

Witness 2~came forth the tuesday after Lindsey went missing(on a friday)and said she saw Lindsey walking on Maple also.

Later,Melissa said one of these witnesses she knew very well and she works with her.Does anyone know which witness Melissa knows and works with?
So does Melissa work for another County because I thought she worked at the Elma dollar store that her friend Melissa McCann runs?

do to the bad reporting i wonder if witness 1 and 2 are the same person?  i'm getting confusseled because i thought that at one time i read that ml was the person that broke up the fight?  i don't know where i'm getting that from but?  or maybe it was her call le when lindsey came over?   ::MonkeyConfused::
One of the witnesses being MLaChester I think that was just a rumor floating around.


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3 7/28/09 -
Post by: pink angel on August 09, 2009, 03:22:43 PM
does anybody remember who the person who saw lindsey walking ( while they were either going to work or coming home can't remember witch, but y'all know who i'm talking about.  does anyone remember a name?
was it ml?
No. Neither of the persons (there was 2) were named.
i wonder why not?  and i wonder if ????  have they talked to anyone it town?  i just wonder about the witnesses  ::MonkeyConfused::

I don't know. Perhaps LE asked that their names not be mentioned publicly. Perhaps they (the witnesses) asked LE not to identify them,, so they wouldn't be hounded by media or have their lives picked apart on the internet.

I don't know.


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3 7/28/09 -
Post by: mamacrazy30 on August 09, 2009, 03:23:24 PM
does anybody remember who the person who saw lindsey walking ( while they were either going to work or coming home can't remember witch, but y'all know who i'm talking about.  does anyone remember a name?
was it ml?
MamaC,as far as I know they never stated the name for any witnesses.I'm still confused on the witnesses to tell you the truth.

Witness 1~broke up the fight with Josh and Lindsey and sent Josh home.Also so Lindsey walking on Maple.Said to be a friend of the family.
Did LE say witness #1 was the one who saw Lindsey on the way to her job,she worked for another county?

Witness 2~came forth the tuesday after Lindsey went missing(on a friday)and said she saw Lindsey walking on Maple also.

Later,Melissa said one of these witnesses she knew very well and she works with her.Does anyone know which witness Melissa knows and works with?
So does Melissa work for another County because I thought she worked at the Elma dollar store that her friend Melissa McCann runs?

do to the bad reporting i wonder if witness 1 and 2 are the same person?  i'm getting confusseled because i thought that at one time i read that ml was the person that broke up the fight?  i don't know where i'm getting that from but?  or maybe it was her call le when lindsey came over?   ::MonkeyConfused::
One of the witnesses being MLaChester I think that was just a rumor floating around.
thanks karma, i was giving myself a headache  ::MonkeyAngel::


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3 7/28/09 -
Post by: mamacrazy30 on August 09, 2009, 03:26:11 PM
does anybody remember who the person who saw lindsey walking ( while they were either going to work or coming home can't remember witch, but y'all know who i'm talking about.  does anyone remember a name?
was it ml?
No. Neither of the persons (there was 2) were named.
i wonder why not?  and i wonder if ????  have they talked to anyone it town?  i just wonder about the witnesses  ::MonkeyConfused::

I don't know. Perhaps LE asked that their names not be mentioned publicly. Perhaps they (the witnesses) asked LE not to identify them,, so they wouldn't be hounded by media or have their lives picked apart on the internet.

I don't know.
i just find it odd that one one side you have kk talking and on the other you have ml talking but the last 2 to see her i'm assuming #1 before she got to kk's house and then #2 after she left have stayed mum the entire time


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3 7/28/09 -
Post by: KarmaRoundUp on August 09, 2009, 03:26:43 PM
does anybody remember who the person who saw lindsey walking ( while they were either going to work or coming home can't remember witch, but y'all know who i'm talking about.  does anyone remember a name?
was it ml?
MamaC,as far as I know they never stated the name for any witnesses.I'm still confused on the witnesses to tell you the truth.

Witness 1~broke up the fight with Josh and Lindsey and sent Josh home.Also so Lindsey walking on Maple.Said to be a friend of the family.
Did LE say witness #1 was the one who saw Lindsey on the way to her job,she worked for another county?

Witness 2~came forth the tuesday after Lindsey went missing(on a friday)and said she saw Lindsey walking on Maple also.

Later,Melissa said one of these witnesses she knew very well and she works with her.Does anyone know which witness Melissa knows and works with?
So does Melissa work for another County because I thought she worked at the Elma dollar store that her friend Melissa McCann runs?

do to the bad reporting i wonder if witness 1 and 2 are the same person?  i'm getting confusseled because i thought that at one time i read that ml was the person that broke up the fight?  i don't know where i'm getting that from but?  or maybe it was her call le when lindsey came over?   ::MonkeyConfused::
One of the witnesses being MLaChester I think that was just a rumor floating around.
thanks karma, i was giving myself a headache  ::MonkeyAngel::
You're welcome MamaC
My headache starts as soon as I start thinking about this case.


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3 7/28/09 -
Post by: love4ever on August 09, 2009, 03:27:40 PM
i really don't know if the myspace post had anything to do with it.  i first i was really hung up on it but she also posted it in the middle of the night.  she was a young girl who loved stephen king (i did as well at her age) on the computer in the middle of the night.  who knows what else she was looking at on the internet.  she was interested in the supernatural as well--the whole 'witching hour' remark and what have you.  heck i could really go all out on a limb and say that the entire town is part of the occult and they all had a hand in lindsey's disappearance.  sometimes i actually can believe it but as of now we have no proof, the reporting was crud from the beginning and its crazy that in a town so small know one seems to have any clue as to what is going on. jmo
Or they do and they are keeping their mouths shut for selfish reasons.

I believe there are people who know things and they are not going to say.  They certainly are not going to tell the police.  if I were the cops I would plant someone down in that bar, undercover and just listen to the drunks and tweakers.  seriously, that is exactly what I would do.  get one of those tweakers on a dope charge and make a deal with them to go listen in that bar.  you would be supprised what they would hear.
well if i go by my own theory (that i don't post or y'all would really think i'm off my rocker) lindsey was fairly new to the town and because everyone knows everyone a new comer form out of state would be good choice and considering her family had no close ties around.  really who does lindseys mom have to comfort her other than kk and she hasn't lived there very long either.

Yea it's sick, the morality of people... :bigdown:


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3 7/28/09 -
Post by: love4ever on August 09, 2009, 03:32:34 PM
Thank you for the pics and info KarmaRoundUp ::MonkeyAngel::


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3 7/28/09 -
Post by: love4ever on August 09, 2009, 03:37:34 PM
Maybe MLachester coerced and manipulated Lindseys feelings so much that Lindsey confided in her for whatever. Maybe Lindsey didn't want to go home and somehow made a secret phone call to MLachester @KK's house and called her. Maybe they met somewhere going up the hill on 6th so no one would see? Who knows jus saying, have all phone records been checked, of all said people?  MLachesters would need to be checked as well for all claims she made public against the family.


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3 7/28/09 -
Post by: love4ever on August 09, 2009, 03:38:26 PM
This is sad, I hope Lindsey is alive!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3 7/28/09 -
Post by: KarmaRoundUp on August 09, 2009, 03:39:21 PM
I looked up the stats on KaraK's house and it appears there is not a basement.

http://www.zillow.com/homedetails/home-info/55056997_zpid/



Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3 7/28/09 -
Post by: love4ever on August 09, 2009, 03:39:40 PM
Maybe KK played both sides of the fence with MB and ML


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3 7/28/09 -
Post by: A_News_Junkie_Monkey on August 09, 2009, 03:40:25 PM
DD - does Roger have a criminal history?  Does he have to register?  Do we know?


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3 7/28/09 -
Post by: mamacrazy30 on August 09, 2009, 03:40:45 PM
Maybe MLachester coerced and manipulated Lindseys feelings so much that Lindsey confided in her for whatever. Maybe Lindsey didn't want to go home and somehow made a secret phone call to MLachester @KK's house and called her. Maybe they met somewhere going up the hill on 6th so no one would see? Who knows jus saying, have all phone records been checked, of all said people?  MLachesters would need to be checked as well for all claims she made public against the family.
i agree considering how vocal she has been.


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3 7/28/09 -
Post by: love4ever on August 09, 2009, 03:41:00 PM
Maybe KK played both sides of the fence with MB and ML

Remember she likes the attention


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3 7/28/09 -
Post by: love4ever on August 09, 2009, 03:41:33 PM
DD - does Roger have a criminal history?  Does he have to register?  Do we know?

That would be nice to know since we do not his last name..LOL


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3 7/28/09 -
Post by: KarmaRoundUp on August 09, 2009, 03:42:02 PM
does anybody remember who the person who saw lindsey walking ( while they were either going to work or coming home can't remember witch, but y'all know who i'm talking about.  does anyone remember a name?
was it ml?
No. Neither of the persons (there was 2) were named.
i wonder why not?  and i wonder if ????  have they talked to anyone it town?  i just wonder about the witnesses  ::MonkeyConfused::

I don't know. Perhaps LE asked that their names not be mentioned publicly. Perhaps they (the witnesses) asked LE not to identify them,, so they wouldn't be hounded by media or have their lives picked apart on the internet.

I don't know.
i just find it odd that one one side you have kk talking and on the other you have ml talking but the last 2 to see her i'm assuming #1 before she got to kk's house and then #2 after she left have stayed mum the entire time
Actually witness #1 saw Lindsey before(broke up fight,sent Josh home)and after Lindsey left KaraK's house(saw Lindsey on her way to work in in/for another county)


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3 7/28/09 -
Post by: love4ever on August 09, 2009, 03:42:42 PM
I think Aunt Flo is coming to visit... Rawrrrrrrrrrrrr..LOL


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3 7/28/09 -
Post by: A_News_Junkie_Monkey on August 09, 2009, 03:49:50 PM
i guess maybe the best thing for us all to do is to start from the beginning again with the facts....i think everyone in here is doing a good job of keeping our minds open about different theories and ideas.  it's ok for us all to change our mind everyday as to what we think could have happened to lindsey, being able to keep an open mind and explore different ideas is a gift :)

lindsey was afraid of something, as evidenced by her myspace page where she wrote that she thought something bad was going to happen... i guess the next logical question would be "is this just a coincidence that she wrote this and then went missing?" if it's not just a coincidence then i think that would point to someone she knows being involved in her disapperance, or it could be her talking about the living environment in her home (maybe she was being abused, however in the eyes of the law there's a difference between discipline and abuse, and yes parents can hit their kids as long as they dont leave marks or cause serious pain or impairment of functioning-not sayin i agree with it, but its the law). 

i could also see this case being similar to the jessica lunsford case. with a so visiting or staying with a relative temporarily in the area.

there was also the law enforcement theory, and let's not forget adam campbell


That is very upsetting to me that Lindsey was afraid something bad was going to happen, at first I thought maybe an active imagination maybe from reading or watching somekind of scary book or movie. Then I thought maybe someone in the town was making her scared, then when I read what Marilyn wrote I thought her brother. But what if it was her mom? Maybe her mom lost her temper and she was scared of that and getting into trouble? All I know is that when I first started reading about Lindsey something came over me and I was very frightened, I have never had that happen before following anyother case.

No Rose - I had the same horrible feeling when I heard about this case.  The one that I still can't follow on an intense or semi intense level is Sandra Cantu.  While I get a feeling of darkness in this case, it is for me no where near the visceral reaction I have when I try to get to far into Sandra's case. 


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3 7/28/09 -
Post by: love4ever on August 09, 2009, 03:52:42 PM
I am too upset about this today, so I am off...Hopefully some sunshine will shed light on this all.
I wish all of you a beautiful day, and Lindsey come home!


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3 7/28/09 -
Post by: KarmaRoundUp on August 09, 2009, 03:54:23 PM
This is a very good link from WS that has a lot of images from JVK.JVK also explains the locations of the images very well.


http://www.websleuths.com/forums/showthread.php?t=86066



Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3 7/28/09 -
Post by: KarmaRoundUp on August 09, 2009, 03:55:16 PM
Thank you for the pics and info KarmaRoundUp ::MonkeyAngel::
You're very welcome Love4Ever.


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3 7/28/09 -
Post by: KarmaRoundUp on August 09, 2009, 03:57:26 PM
KaraK's house.





Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3 7/28/09 -
Post by: KarmaRoundUp on August 09, 2009, 03:58:27 PM
KaraK's house.




dang,forgot the pic lol




Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3 7/28/09 -
Post by: no rose colored glasses on August 09, 2009, 04:00:48 PM
Thanks, that house isn't big enough for a roomate  ::MonkeyEek::


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3 7/28/09 -
Post by: doubledecker on August 09, 2009, 04:03:56 PM
does anybody remember who the person who saw lindsey walking ( while they were either going to work or coming home can't remember witch, but y'all know who i'm talking about.  does anyone remember a name?
was it ml?

I know who it is, the name is not public and no one has ever mentioned this name anywhere that I know of.   


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3 7/28/09 -
Post by: atlanta_mom on August 09, 2009, 04:23:05 PM
just curious, why does it really matter if she had a roomate or not?  I know It would mean she (or someone) is lying- i get that.  But does it really matter when it comes to Lindsey?  Is this guy a thug?


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3 7/28/09 -
Post by: doubledecker on August 09, 2009, 04:24:33 PM
DD - does Roger have a criminal history?  Does he have to register?  Do we know?

I have not found one, but I have not had time to look much either, I just got his last name a couple of days ago.  he does work in mccleary(I am told) at a public place where lots of people would go all the time.  Lots of different people, open to the general public.  He also is said to hang out at the bar all the time.  I am sure a lot of people know him.  today I will get on this and look for criminal records.  one of the problems is the person who spelled his last name, spelled it the way it SOUNDED and I found him under a different spelling of the last name, but I am pretty sure it is him, but I have to make sure it is him, then look all over the place. 



Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3 7/28/09 -
Post by: sunshine12 on August 09, 2009, 04:28:11 PM
Thanks, that house isn't big enough for a roomate  ::MonkeyEek::

it also doesn't look like it has a basement.


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3 7/28/09 -
Post by: sunshine12 on August 09, 2009, 04:29:27 PM
DD - does Roger have a criminal history?  Does he have to register?  Do we know?

I have not found one, but I have not had time to look much either, I just got his last name a couple of days ago.  he does work in mccleary(I am told) at a public place where lots of people would go all the time.  Lots of different people, open to the general public.  He also is said to hang out at the bar all the time.  I am sure a lot of people know him.  today I will get on this and look for criminal records.  one of the problems is the person who spelled his last name, spelled it the way it SOUNDED and I found him under a different spelling of the last name, but I am pretty sure it is him, but I have to make sure it is him, then look all over the place. 



does he work at the grocery store?


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3 7/28/09 -
Post by: no rose colored glasses on August 09, 2009, 04:29:31 PM
just curious, why does it really matter if she had a roomate or not?  I know It would mean she (or someone) is lying- i get that.  But does it really matter when it comes to Lindsey?  Is this guy a thug?
That's what I wonder if this guy has a record or something.


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3 7/28/09 -
Post by: Tracygirl on August 09, 2009, 04:30:12 PM
This is a very good link from WS that has a lot of images from JVK.JVK also explains the locations of the images very well.


http://www.websleuths.com/forums/showthread.php?t=86066



Thank you for posting this link, I looked through the pics, interesting stuff and a few interesting comments too. I had not seen the pic of Kara standing with her daughter and son on the day they were selling cupcakes. I stared at that pic and I do not see anything other then a person who is trying to find a missing girl. You can see the strain on her face and I can feel the despiration.  Her motives, in my opinion, show care for Lindsey. I wish I was closer because I would be helping her and the mom. I think they need the help, doesn't sound as though they are getting any. Shameful, just shameful.



Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3 7/28/09 -
Post by: no rose colored glasses on August 09, 2009, 04:36:02 PM
(I was just looking at the pics that were posted by JVK on WS, excellent pictures. One of the little stories that JVK told I found to be interesting.)       


Right after snapping this photo i was approached by 'Mark the (apparent) local drunk. He was quite intoxicated & slurry.

He asked what i was doing and i told him.

He was a bit 'chatty' and slurred out a few things.

Mark portrayed 'Peter' (iirc) (the owner or worker of the Jewelry shop ^, on Maple) as not having a 'great opinion of Lindsey &/or the Baum family. "~That girl was up to 'things'" (Lindsey)

Mark also didn't have such a great opinion. Mark mentioned being aware Lindsey was on the internet. He generally & repeatedly came off disliking Lindsey &/or the family.

Mark added one other thing. Mark said he believes 'Eric' (who lives (according to Marks pointing) in the North-Eastern part of town) 'probably did it' (as in abducting Lindsey) Mark said Eric had conversed with him (@ an unknown time) about 'young girls.

The conversation was strange.. but you couldn't expect much else. At one point he stopped talking almost like he'd just realized he's telling all this to a stranger & briefly thought twice.

If nothing else i'd suggest an interview with persons from this ^ Jewelry shop.


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3 7/28/09 -
Post by: Tracygirl on August 09, 2009, 04:37:14 PM
just curious, why does it really matter if she had a roomate or not?  I know It would mean she (or someone) is lying- i get that.  But does it really matter when it comes to Lindsey?  Is this guy a thug?
That's what I wonder if this guy has a record or something.

I think we must be missing a local rumor or something. Is there local talk about this man having a hand in this?


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3 7/28/09 -
Post by: no rose colored glasses on August 09, 2009, 04:37:43 PM
just curious, why does it really matter if she had a roomate or not?  I know It would mean she (or someone) is lying- i get that.  But does it really matter when it comes to Lindsey?  Is this guy a thug?
That's what I wonder if this guy has a record or something.
I'm sorry DD, I see that you posted about this. I was wondering if you have heard about any of these characters that I just posted from JVK from WS, interesting.


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3 7/28/09 -
Post by: Tamikosmom on August 09, 2009, 04:41:49 PM
There is also the Evergreen apartments at 907 W Simpson RD.



Thanks Karma

Do you know where Jim Mullins Creek is located ... the Creek that was searched six times?

Thanks

Janet


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3 7/28/09 -
Post by: KarmaRoundUp on August 09, 2009, 04:44:24 PM
Thanks, that house isn't big enough for a roomate  ::MonkeyEek::
That's for sure,not with 6 people living there already.


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3 7/28/09 -
Post by: no rose colored glasses on August 09, 2009, 04:47:06 PM
Thanks, that house isn't big enough for a roomate  ::MonkeyEek::
That's for sure,not with 6 people living there already.
Those pictures were very good, really gives you a feel of everything in town.


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3 7/28/09 -
Post by: KarmaRoundUp on August 09, 2009, 04:49:32 PM
This is a very good link from WS that has a lot of images from JVK.JVK also explains the locations of the images very well.


http://www.websleuths.com/forums/showthread.php?t=86066



Thank you for posting this link, I looked through the pics, interesting stuff and a few interesting comments too. I had not seen the pic of Kara standing with her daughter and son on the day they were selling cupcakes. I stared at that pic and I do not see anything other then a person who is trying to find a missing girl. You can see the strain on her face and I can feel the despiration.  Her motives, in my opinion, show care for Lindsey. I wish I was closer because I would be helping her and the mom. I think they need the help, doesn't sound as though they are getting any. Shameful, just shameful.


I agree,until it is proven I will have to believe at least some of what KaraK posted......but I never believe all of what anyone says.Trust issues?Yep,you bet.      ::MonkeyWink::


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3 7/28/09 -
Post by: A_News_Junkie_Monkey on August 09, 2009, 04:50:35 PM
DD - does Roger have a criminal history?  Does he have to register?  Do we know?

That would be nice to know since we do not his last name..LOL

I might have misunderstood - but I think DD has his last name, so if she has it - I am sure she knows this.  Hope she can tell us. 


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3 7/28/09 -
Post by: KarmaRoundUp on August 09, 2009, 04:52:39 PM
(I was just looking at the pics that were posted by JVK on WS, excellent pictures. One of the little stories that JVK told I found to be interesting.)       


Right after snapping this photo i was approached by 'Mark the (apparent) local drunk. He was quite intoxicated & slurry.

He asked what i was doing and i told him.

He was a bit 'chatty' and slurred out a few things.

Mark portrayed 'Peter' (iirc) (the owner or worker of the Jewelry shop ^, on Maple) as not having a 'great opinion of Lindsey &/or the Baum family. "~That girl was up to 'things'" (Lindsey)

Mark also didn't have such a great opinion. Mark mentioned being aware Lindsey was on the internet. He generally & repeatedly came off disliking Lindsey &/or the family.

Mark added one other thing. Mark said he believes 'Eric' (who lives (according to Marks pointing) in the North-Eastern part of town) 'probably did it' (as in abducting Lindsey) Mark said Eric had conversed with him (@ an unknown time) about 'young girls.

The conversation was strange.. but you couldn't expect much else. At one point he stopped talking almost like he'd just realized he's telling all this to a stranger & briefly thought twice.

If nothing else i'd suggest an interview with persons from this ^ Jewelry shop.

I remember when JVK posted that story and I think(ICBW)that he said this Eric owns the house Melissa and the kids live in.I tried to find out who owns the house but I'm not good at that at all.


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3 7/28/09 -
Post by: A_News_Junkie_Monkey on August 09, 2009, 04:53:31 PM
This is a very good link from WS that has a lot of images from JVK.JVK also explains the locations of the images very well.


http://www.websleuths.com/forums/showthread.php?t=86066



I saw this, so I found JVK's  Photobucket account -  http://s242.photobucket.com/albums/ff92/BGL78/

TONS of pic's of McCleary - be sure to expand albums on left after you pick one.  Tons of sub albums.


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3 7/28/09 -
Post by: KarmaRoundUp on August 09, 2009, 04:59:39 PM
There is also the Evergreen apartments at 907 W Simpson RD.



Thanks Karma

Do you know where Jim Mullins Creek is located ... the Creek that was searched six times?

Thanks

Janet
That's a big one that me and others were looking for and I think I did find it but it's not called Jim Mullins creek....let me go check.

OK,I have written down:
Sands Creek
and
Mill Creek Ravine

I haven't investigated these yet and don't know where they are.


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3 7/28/09 -
Post by: doubledecker on August 09, 2009, 05:00:11 PM
just curious, why does it really matter if she had a roomate or not?  I know It would mean she (or someone) is lying- i get that.  But does it really matter when it comes to Lindsey?  Is this guy a thug?
That's what I wonder if this guy has a record or something.
I'm sorry DD, I see that you posted about this. I was wondering if you have heard about any of these characters that I just posted from JVK from WS, interesting.

no have not heard about any of them, but I will try to find out. 


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3 7/28/09 -
Post by: A_News_Junkie_Monkey on August 09, 2009, 05:00:43 PM
DD - does Roger have a criminal history?  Does he have to register?  Do we know?

That would be nice to know since we do not his last name..LOL

I might have misunderstood - but I think DD has his last name, so if she has it - I am sure she knows this.  Hope she can tell us. 

When will I learn to finish reading before posting! ?  LOL


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3 7/28/09 -
Post by: KarmaRoundUp on August 09, 2009, 05:02:58 PM
This is a very good link from WS that has a lot of images from JVK.JVK also explains the locations of the images very well.


http://www.websleuths.com/forums/showthread.php?t=86066



I saw this, so I found JVK's  Photobucket account -  http://s242.photobucket.com/albums/ff92/BGL78/

TONS of pic's of McCleary - be sure to expand albums on left after you pick one.  Tons of sub albums.
Thanks NewsJunkie
Lot's more pictures.....I haven't looked at these in a while.


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3 7/28/09 -
Post by: A_News_Junkie_Monkey on August 09, 2009, 05:03:10 PM
(I was just looking at the pics that were posted by JVK on WS, excellent pictures. One of the little stories that JVK told I found to be interesting.)       


Right after snapping this photo i was approached by 'Mark the (apparent) local drunk. He was quite intoxicated & slurry.

He asked what i was doing and i told him.

He was a bit 'chatty' and slurred out a few things.

Mark portrayed 'Peter' (iirc) (the owner or worker of the Jewelry shop ^, on Maple) as not having a 'great opinion of Lindsey &/or the Baum family. "~That girl was up to 'things'" (Lindsey)

Mark also didn't have such a great opinion. Mark mentioned being aware Lindsey was on the internet. He generally & repeatedly came off disliking Lindsey &/or the family.

Mark added one other thing. Mark said he believes 'Eric' (who lives (according to Marks pointing) in the North-Eastern part of town) 'probably did it' (as in abducting Lindsey) Mark said Eric had conversed with him (@ an unknown time) about 'young girls.

The conversation was strange.. but you couldn't expect much else. At one point he stopped talking almost like he'd just realized he's telling all this to a stranger & briefly thought twice.

If nothing else i'd suggest an interview with persons from this ^ Jewelry shop.


NOROSE - that one got to me too when I read it the other night.  Makes you wonder so many things!


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3 7/28/09 -
Post by: doubledecker on August 09, 2009, 05:05:38 PM
There is also the Evergreen apartments at 907 W Simpson RD.



Thanks Karma

Do you know where Jim Mullins Creek is located ... the Creek that was searched six times?

Thanks

Janet
That's a big one that me and others were looking for and I think I did find it but it's not called Jim Mullins creek....let me go check.

OK,I have written down:
Sands Creek
and
Mill Creek Ravine

I haven't investigated these yet and don't know where they are.


locals told me that jim mullin's creek is the creek behind simpsons plant,  it is actually wildcat creek, and the local kids call it "tweakers" creek.   it is the north end of 6th back behind simpsons mill/door plant, you have to go through the mill/plant to get back in there, it is overgrown to the max and you take these overgrown trails alongside the creek before you can get back in there.

I posted a map someone on here with it marked and I described it all. 


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3 7/28/09 -
Post by: Tamikosmom on August 09, 2009, 05:07:03 PM

I am in contact with a good friend of marilyn's family and this person ask Marilyn specifically the questions I asked her to ask.  Marilyn also told her that I can talk with her(marilyn) personally and I intend on getting ahold of Marilyn herself TODAY.  This was Marilyn's suggestion as I am told through the family friend.  I did not wish to bother marilyn but because I have been invited by her to talk with her, I will.


DD

Were you afforded the opportunity to talk with mlachester?  Did you have a list of a zillion Monkeys questions ready?

 ::MonkeyHaHa::

Janet


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3 7/28/09 -
Post by: Tamikosmom on August 09, 2009, 05:13:52 PM
There is also the Evergreen apartments at 907 W Simpson RD.



Thanks Karma

Do you know where Jim Mullins Creek is located ... the Creek that was searched six times?

Thanks

Janet
That's a big one that me and others were looking for and I think I did find it but it's not called Jim Mullins creek....let me go check.

OK,I have written down:
Sands Creek
and
Mill Creek Ravine

I haven't investigated these yet and don't know where they are.


locals told me that jim mullin's creek is the creek behind simpsons plant,  it is actually wildcat creek, and the local kids call it "tweakers" creek.   it is the north end of 6th back behind simpsons mill/door plant, you have to go through the mill/plant to get back in there, it is overgrown to the max and you take these overgrown trails alongside the creek before you can get back in there.

I posted a map someone on here with it marked and I described it all. 

Thank you DD.  I will look for the map.  In my speculating ... I was wondering if the creek was located a short distance from the two block stretch between 5th and the Baum residence.

Janet

 


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3 7/28/09 -
Post by: mamacrazy30 on August 09, 2009, 05:20:11 PM
does anybody remember who the person who saw lindsey walking ( while they were either going to work or coming home can't remember witch, but y'all know who i'm talking about.  does anyone remember a name?
was it ml?
No. Neither of the persons (there was 2) were named.
i wonder why not?  and i wonder if ????  have they talked to anyone it town?  i just wonder about the witnesses  ::MonkeyConfused::

I don't know. Perhaps LE asked that their names not be mentioned publicly. Perhaps they (the witnesses) asked LE not to identify them,, so they wouldn't be hounded by media or have their lives picked apart on the internet.

I don't know.
i just find it odd that one one side you have kk talking and on the other you have ml talking but the last 2 to see her i'm assuming #1 before she got to kk's house and then #2 after she left have stayed mum the entire time
Actually witness #1 saw Lindsey before(broke up fight,sent Josh home)and after Lindsey left KaraK's house(saw Lindsey on her way to work in in/for another county)
so witness #1 and witness #2 ARE the same person?


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3 7/28/09 -
Post by: pink angel on August 09, 2009, 05:24:26 PM
does anybody remember who the person who saw lindsey walking ( while they were either going to work or coming home can't remember witch, but y'all know who i'm talking about.  does anyone remember a name?
was it ml?
No. Neither of the persons (there was 2) were named.
i wonder why not?  and i wonder if ????  have they talked to anyone it town?  i just wonder about the witnesses  ::MonkeyConfused::

I don't know. Perhaps LE asked that their names not be mentioned publicly. Perhaps they (the witnesses) asked LE not to identify them,, so they wouldn't be hounded by media or have their lives picked apart on the internet.

I don't know.
i just find it odd that one one side you have kk talking and on the other you have ml talking but the last 2 to see her i'm assuming #1 before she got to kk's house and then #2 after she left have stayed mum the entire time
Actually witness #1 saw Lindsey before(broke up fight,sent Josh home)and after Lindsey left KaraK's house(saw Lindsey on her way to work in in/for another county)
so witness #1 and witness #2 ARE the same person?

No, witness #1 saw her twice. Going to KaraK's house and on her return home.
Witness #2 came forward at a later date and only saw her once.


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3 7/28/09 -
Post by: Tamikosmom on August 09, 2009, 05:25:38 PM
There were two witness who observed Lindsey Baum in her journey along Maple on her way home on the evening of June 26, 2009.

Janet

++++++

THE WITNESSES

Grays Harbor Undersheriff Rick Scott

ABC News – June 30, 2009


Scott said witnesses were able to put Lindsey within a couple of blocks of her house just after 9:30 p.m. The last person reported to have seen her, he said, was a neighbor on her way to work.

http://abcnews.go.com/US/Story?id=7966924&page=2


Grays Harbor Undersheriff Rick Scott

The Daily World - July 2, 2009


Scott said a second person came forward Tuesday with a confirmed sighting of Baum from Friday night in the same area along Maple Street near Fifth Street.

http://**/articles/2009/07/02/local_news/doc4a4cf43c1b1dd881132403


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3 7/28/09 -
Post by: mamacrazy30 on August 09, 2009, 05:32:51 PM
does anybody remember who the person who saw lindsey walking ( while they were either going to work or coming home can't remember witch, but y'all know who i'm talking about.  does anyone remember a name?
was it ml?
No. Neither of the persons (there was 2) were named.
i wonder why not?  and i wonder if ????  have they talked to anyone it town?  i just wonder about the witnesses  ::MonkeyConfused::

I don't know. Perhaps LE asked that their names not be mentioned publicly. Perhaps they (the witnesses) asked LE not to identify them,, so they wouldn't be hounded by media or have their lives picked apart on the internet.

I don't know.
i just find it odd that one one side you have kk talking and on the other you have ml talking but the last 2 to see her i'm assuming #1 before she got to kk's house and then #2 after she left have stayed mum the entire time
Actually witness #1 saw Lindsey before(broke up fight,sent Josh home)and after Lindsey left KaraK's house(saw Lindsey on her way to work in in/for another county)
so witness #1 and witness #2 ARE the same person?

No, witness #1 saw her twice. Going to KaraK's house and on her return home.
Witness #2 came forward at a later date and only saw her once.
thanks pink my head was about to explode on that one ::MonkeyJnBox::


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3 7/28/09 -
Post by: mamacrazy30 on August 09, 2009, 05:35:21 PM
pink, do you remember how long before witness #2 spoke up..like a couple of days later or like a week later?  i just wonder if #2 should be discounted or not.


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3 7/28/09 -
Post by: KarmaRoundUp on August 09, 2009, 05:36:09 PM
There is also the Evergreen apartments at 907 W Simpson RD.



Thanks Karma

Do you know where Jim Mullins Creek is located ... the Creek that was searched six times?

Thanks

Janet
That's a big one that me and others were looking for and I think I did find it but it's not called Jim Mullins creek....let me go check.

OK,I have written down:
Sands Creek
and
Mill Creek Ravine

I haven't investigated these yet and don't know where they are.


locals told me that jim mullin's creek is the creek behind simpsons plant,  it is actually wildcat creek, and the local kids call it "tweakers" creek.   it is the north end of 6th back behind simpsons mill/door plant, you have to go through the mill/plant to get back in there, it is overgrown to the max and you take these overgrown trails alongside the creek before you can get back in there.

I posted a map someone on here with it marked and I described it all. 
Thanks DD,now I'm wondering why kids would even want to go back there.


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3 7/28/09 -
Post by: doubledecker on August 09, 2009, 05:37:51 PM
There is also the Evergreen apartments at 907 W Simpson RD.



the jim mullin creek info and map are over here
http://truecrime.forums-free.com/jim-mullin-creek-t132.html


anything you wish to find go here
http://truecrime.forums-free.com/

then scroll to the case you wish info on
in this instance it would be the lindsey baum case
so scroll until you find the lindsey baum case
click and it takes you here
http://truecrime.forums-free.com/lindsey-baum-10-yr-old-mccleary-wa-june-26-2009-f24.html

once you are on a specific case you will see many categories, each category has its own section and they are all titled, such as  news articles, who is who, documents, photos, locations, maps etc.
choose the one you want and click on it
in this instance you would choose LOCATIONS
which takes you here
http://truecrime.forums-free.com/lindsey-baum-case-locations-f51.html

normally you would find an INDEX thread at the top but I have not had time to index all this stuff yet, so in the locations area you are at by now, you scroll to find the info you want, in this case scroll down to jim mullin creek.  all of the info and map for jim mullin creek will be in that thread. 

you can do this for anything you are looking for. 

to get an idea of how the indexes work, you can go to the WHO IS WHO section, and click on it, and when it opens here
http://truecrime.forums-free.com/who-is-who-f43.html
 you wil see a who is who index at the top of the page, you click that
http://truecrime.forums-free.com/who-is-who-f43.html

and everything will be listed alphabetically with all the names or in more than one place, one for the name, one in categories they fit, such as sex offenders or whatever. 

but I don't have the indexes finished yet, and there is a ton more info I have to add, but there is still quite a bit over there already.

anyone can go over there and see the info without registering.  it just makes it easier to find things.  hopefully, I can work on it more and get it finished, I just never have time. ugh






Thanks Karma

Do you know where Jim Mullins Creek is located ... the Creek that was searched six times?

Thanks

Janet
That's a big one that me and others were looking for and I think I did find it but it's not called Jim Mullins creek....let me go check.

OK,I have written down:
Sands Creek
and
Mill Creek Ravine

I haven't investigated these yet and don't know where they are.


locals told me that jim mullin's creek is the creek behind simpsons plant,  it is actually wildcat creek, and the local kids call it "tweakers" creek.   it is the north end of 6th back behind simpsons mill/door plant, you have to go through the mill/plant to get back in there, it is overgrown to the max and you take these overgrown trails alongside the creek before you can get back in there.

I posted a map someone on here with it marked and I described it all. 

Thank you DD.  I will look for the map.  In my speculating ... I was wondering if the creek was located a short distance from the two block stretch between 5th and the Baum residence.

Janet

 


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3 7/28/09 -
Post by: mamacrazy30 on August 09, 2009, 05:40:59 PM
pink, do you remember how long before witness #2 spoke up..like a couple of days later or like a week later?  i just wonder if #2 should be discounted or not.
the only reason i say this its because it would be so easy days after the fact (when everyone knows she's missing and where she was last seen and what she was wearing) for some person who wants a little attention to say 'oh yeah, i saw her too that night she was going yada, and wearing yada.


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3 7/28/09 -
Post by: no rose colored glasses on August 09, 2009, 05:44:07 PM
pink, do you remember how long before witness #2 spoke up..like a couple of days later or like a week later?  i just wonder if #2 should be discounted or not.
the only reason i say this its because it would be so easy days after the fact (when everyone knows she's missing and where she was last seen and what she was wearing) for some person who wants a little attention to say 'oh yeah, i saw her too that night she was going yada, and wearing yada.
And I'm sure that happens in a lot of cases.


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3 7/28/09 -
Post by: mamacrazy30 on August 09, 2009, 05:44:35 PM
DD   does everybody know its 'tweakers creek' and if so ~sigh, here it comes again~ why would ww take anybody fishing there.  he's all about ecology and if he knows the area, and its history so to say, so why would he go fishing there much less with a child given the fact that its a meth hangout?


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3 7/28/09 -
Post by: Tamikosmom on August 09, 2009, 05:49:15 PM
Could it be the McCleary Law Enforcement is focusing attention away from Melissa and Josh as suspects in an attempt to shield the "powers that be" who disregarded Marilyn's attempt to get protection for Lindsey from both her Mother and brother?

No throwing bananas please.  Neighbour who makes delicious loaves with my brused and over-riped bananas has taken off this morning with hubby for a week's vacation.

 ::MonkeyHaHa::

Janet

++++++++

ACCORDING TO MLACHESTER:

Rob
Re: Lindsey Baum #3 7/28/09 -
« Reply #896 on: August 08, 2009, 04:29:38 PM »


Quote
As far as the abuse Lindsey went threw the MPD knows the FBI also knows.

Quote
They have the reports I help Lindsey file

Quote
Just as of this moring when the FBI was at my house I made a comment about the 911 calls and the call to CPS.

http://scaredmonkeys.net/index.php?action=post;quote=904672;topic=5790.880;num_replies=1162;sesc=28414912316d49a494791fe51542bb71


doubledecker
Re: Lindsey Baum #3 7/28/09 -
« Reply #976 on: Today at 12:34:07 AM »


this is to me from a friend of marilyns

... one time she called CPS on melissa baum when lindsey came over with welts from her calfs to her back.  she was horrified and i think a couple others saw this at her house.  the other incidents with Josh were chasing her with knife, shovel, choking, and at least one other attack against another individual (and here i forgot to write it down, i think it was a female but can't recall if it was an adult or child, but marilyn made the call).  she says he was very violent and went to Juvi many times!  hmm.  anyway, i don't think she's lying, that's a whole lot to be lying about, haha

http://scaredmonkeys.net/index.php?topic=5790.msg904974#msg904974


mlachester:
To answer the questions everyone has asked, Yes I have talked to police and as far as things being unfounded its more of lazy work by cps and I don't know what the police were thinking. Since Lindsey has gone missing I have helped serch and put fliers up. I was called by the agents investigating and told them what I know. And this is no nick name everyone in McCleary knows who I am. Its no big secret she had came to my house to call 911 when her brother had done things to her. I hope lindsey is hiding and she finds a way to get to someone for help to tell them why. But as everyday gose by the fear gets worse.

http://www.king5.com/topstories/stories/NW_063009WAB-Mccleary-girl-search-LJ.1fc0b759.html?ocp=2#slcgm_comments_anchor


mlachester:
I am close to her and I know a lot more than the media or law enforcement are saying right now. As for Scanner, sorry if you don't like the truth but I have never been one to keep the truth in and she should of been taken the first time she called 911 from my house asking for help instead of put in a police car and taken back to her abuser!"

http://www.king5.com/topstories/stor...omments_anchor





Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3 7/28/09 -
Post by: mamacrazy30 on August 09, 2009, 05:51:45 PM
drugs must be rampant in the small town of McCleary if kids are calling places things like tweakers creek (and were talking 9-14 year old kids and i'm sure they know exactly what they're talking about).  McCleary has a population of less then 2000 people and 3 LE officers......local drunk says jewelry store owner dosen't like lindsey.  jewelry=money median income in town about $30,000...drugs=money.  i really do believe that more than one person is involved in this.


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3 7/28/09 -
Post by: Sister on August 09, 2009, 05:55:29 PM
That LE would "shield" in order to cover their own butts . . . can't say it has never happened, but I haven't read a shred to indicate this might even be true, except of course from ML.  And we know this is a fact because ML said it?
Yeah, right!
Now, I think this is the truth:
mlachester:
I am close to her and I know a lot more than the media or law enforcement


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3 7/28/09 -
Post by: mamacrazy30 on August 09, 2009, 05:58:21 PM
That LE would "shield" in order to cover their own butts . . . can't say it has never happened, but I haven't read a shred to indicate this might even be true, except of course from ML.  And we know this is a fact because ML said it?
Yeah, right!
Now, I think this is the truth:
mlachester:
I am close to her and I know a lot more than the media or law enforcement

do you think she might be hiding her or do you think it might be on the more sinister side?


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3 7/28/09 -
Post by: KarmaRoundUp on August 09, 2009, 06:01:09 PM
does anybody remember who the person who saw lindsey walking ( while they were either going to work or coming home can't remember witch, but y'all know who i'm talking about.  does anyone remember a name?
was it ml?
No. Neither of the persons (there was 2) were named.
i wonder why not?  and i wonder if ????  have they talked to anyone it town?  i just wonder about the witnesses  ::MonkeyConfused::

I don't know. Perhaps LE asked that their names not be mentioned publicly. Perhaps they (the witnesses) asked LE not to identify them,, so they wouldn't be hounded by media or have their lives picked apart on the internet.

I don't know.
i just find it odd that one one side you have kk talking and on the other you have ml talking but the last 2 to see her i'm assuming #1 before she got to kk's house and then #2 after she left have stayed mum the entire time
Actually witness #1 saw Lindsey before(broke up fight,sent Josh home)and after Lindsey left KaraK's house(saw Lindsey on her way to work in in/for another county)
so witness #1 and witness #2 ARE the same person?
I don't think so.
Witness #1 is the 1st one to come forward,said she is a good friend of the Baum family,she broke up the fight with Lindsey and Josh,sent Josh home.Then she also saw Lindsey while she was on her way to work(when Lindsey was walking home on Maple)LE said she works in another county and saw Lindsey again on her way to work.

Witness #2 came forward the tuesday after Lindsey went missing,said she saw Lindsey walking toward home on Maple.

The witness that Melissa stated she knows and works with her......I don't know which witness this is,#1 or #2.


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3 7/28/09 -
Post by: mamacrazy30 on August 09, 2009, 06:03:18 PM
does anybody remember who the person who saw lindsey walking ( while they were either going to work or coming home can't remember witch, but y'all know who i'm talking about.  does anyone remember a name?
was it ml?
No. Neither of the persons (there was 2) were named.
i wonder why not?  and i wonder if ????  have they talked to anyone it town?  i just wonder about the witnesses  ::MonkeyConfused::

I don't know. Perhaps LE asked that their names not be mentioned publicly. Perhaps they (the witnesses) asked LE not to identify them,, so they wouldn't be hounded by media or have their lives picked apart on the internet.

I don't know.
i just find it odd that one one side you have kk talking and on the other you have ml talking but the last 2 to see her i'm assuming #1 before she got to kk's house and then #2 after she left have stayed mum the entire time
Actually witness #1 saw Lindsey before(broke up fight,sent Josh home)and after Lindsey left KaraK's house(saw Lindsey on her way to work in in/for another county)
so witness #1 and witness #2 ARE the same person?
I don't think so.
Witness #1 is the 1st one to come forward,said she is a good friend of the Baum family,she broke up the fight with Lindsey and Josh,sent Josh home.Then she also saw Lindsey while she was on her way to work(when Lindsey was walking home on Maple)LE said she works in another county and saw Lindsey again on her way to work.

Witness #2 came forward the tuesday after Lindsey went missing,said she saw Lindsey walking toward home on Maple.

The witness that Melissa stated she knows and works with her......I don't know which witness this is,#1 or #2.
thanks karma, pink cleared it up for me ::MonkeyAngel::


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3 7/28/09 -
Post by: Sister on August 09, 2009, 06:05:14 PM
That LE would "shield" in order to cover their own butts . . . can't say it has never happened, but I haven't read a shred to indicate this might even be true, except of course from ML.  And we know this is a fact because ML said it?
Yeah, right!
Now, I think this is the truth:
mlachester:
I am close to her and I know a lot more than the media or law enforcement

do you think she might be hiding her or do you think it might be on the more sinister side?

I can only say IMO mlachester is on the sinister side -- anyone else check her background?


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3 7/28/09 -
Post by: mamacrazy30 on August 09, 2009, 06:07:56 PM
That LE would "shield" in order to cover their own butts . . . can't say it has never happened, but I haven't read a shred to indicate this might even be true, except of course from ML.  And we know this is a fact because ML said it?
Yeah, right!
Now, I think this is the truth:
mlachester:
I am close to her and I know a lot more than the media or law enforcement

do you think she might be hiding her or do you think it might be on the more sinister side?

I can only say IMO mlachester is on the sinister side -- anyone else check her background?
i haven't.  whats up with her?


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3 7/28/09 -
Post by: KarmaRoundUp on August 09, 2009, 06:10:03 PM
DD wrote:

Quote
the jim mullin creek info and map are over here
http://truecrime.forums-free.com/jim-mullin-creek-t132.html


anything you wish to find go here
http://truecrime.forums-free.com/

then scroll to the case you wish info on
in this instance it would be the lindsey baum case
so scroll until you find the lindsey baum case
click and it takes you here
http://truecrime.forums-free.com/lindsey-baum-10-yr-old-mccleary-wa-june-26-2009-f24.html

once you are on a specific case you will see many categories, each category has its own section and they are all titled, such as  news articles, who is who, documents, photos, locations, maps etc.
choose the one you want and click on it
in this instance you would choose LOCATIONS
which takes you here
http://truecrime.forums-free.com/lindsey-baum-case-locations-f51.html

normally you would find an INDEX thread at the top but I have not had time to index all this stuff yet, so in the locations area you are at by now, you scroll to find the info you want, in this case scroll down to jim mullin creek.  all of the info and map for jim mullin creek will be in that thread.

you can do this for anything you are looking for.

to get an idea of how the indexes work, you can go to the WHO IS WHO section, and click on it, and when it opens here
http://truecrime.forums-free.com/who-is-who-f43.html
 you wil see a who is who index at the top of the page, you click that
http://truecrime.forums-free.com/who-is-who-f43.html

and everything will be listed alphabetically with all the names or in more than one place, one for the name, one in categories they fit, such as sex offenders or whatever.

but I don't have the indexes finished yet, and there is a ton more info I have to add, but there is still quite a bit over there already.

anyone can go over there and see the info without registering.  it just makes it easier to find things.  hopefully, I can work on it more and get it finished, I just never have time. ugh



Thank you DD!


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3 7/28/09 -
Post by: Sister on August 09, 2009, 06:17:49 PM
That LE would "shield" in order to cover their own butts . . . can't say it has never happened, but I haven't read a shred to indicate this might even be true, except of course from ML.  And we know this is a fact because ML said it?
Yeah, right!
Now, I think this is the truth:
mlachester:
I am close to her and I know a lot more than the media or law enforcement


do you think she might be hiding her or do you think it might be on the more sinister side?

I can only say IMO mlachester is on the sinister side -- anyone else check her background?
i haven't.  whats up with her?

go check it out and tell me what you think it all means.  Like to get your read on it.


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3 7/28/09 -
Post by: doubledecker on August 09, 2009, 06:19:30 PM
DD   does everybody know its 'tweakers creek' and if so ~sigh, here it comes again~ why would ww take anybody fishing there.  he's all about ecology and if he knows the area, and its history so to say, so why would he go fishing there much less with a child given the fact that its a meth hangout?

oh I must have missed that info, I never knew where ww took josh fishing, just that he took him fishing... did not know where. 

I just know the kids call it tweakers creek, (so I am told)  not sure who all knows who hangs out there. 


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3 7/28/09 -
Post by: sunshine12 on August 09, 2009, 06:22:06 PM
is Roger A Marlin the roger mlachester was talkin about allegedly living in karak's house.. the reason i'm wondering is because he is listed as a witness to the wedding of mlachester and feestus lachester

http://truecrime.forums-free.com/marilyn-lachester-nee-burns-festus-lachester-iii-t676.html


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3 7/28/09 -
Post by: doubledecker on August 09, 2009, 06:24:11 PM
is Roger A Marlin the roger mlachester was talkin about allegedly living in karak's house.. the reason i'm wondering is because he is listed as a witness to the wedding of mlachester and feestus lachester

http://truecrime.forums-free.com/marilyn-lachester-nee-burns-festus-lachester-iii-t676.html

no that is not the same person.


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3 7/28/09 -
Post by: mamacrazy30 on August 09, 2009, 06:26:54 PM
DD   does everybody know its 'tweakers creek' and if so ~sigh, here it comes again~ why would ww take anybody fishing there.  he's all about ecology and if he knows the area, and its history so to say, so why would he go fishing there much less with a child given the fact that its a meth hangout?

oh I must have missed that info, I never knew where ww took josh fishing, just that he took him fishing... did not know where. 

I just know the kids call it tweakers creek, (so I am told)  not sure who all knows who hangs out there. 
i don't know if he did? ::MonkeyConfused:: i could be getting it wrong and thinking that that is where the kids all hung out?  and if thats they case why in the heck kids be hanging out at a place like tweakers creek? ::MonkeyEek::


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3 7/28/09 -
Post by: pink angel on August 09, 2009, 06:30:20 PM
That LE would "shield" in order to cover their own butts . . . can't say it has never happened, but I haven't read a shred to indicate this might even be true, except of course from ML.  And we know this is a fact because ML said it?
Yeah, right!
Now, I think this is the truth:
mlachester:
I am close to her and I know a lot more than the media or law enforcement

do you think she might be hiding her or do you think it might be on the more sinister side?

I can only say IMO mlachester is on the sinister side -- anyone else check her background?


I agree Sister. I don't give credibility to anything she has said.


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3 7/28/09 -
Post by: mamacrazy30 on August 09, 2009, 06:31:05 PM
That LE would "shield" in order to cover their own butts . . . can't say it has never happened, but I haven't read a shred to indicate this might even be true, except of course from ML.  And we know this is a fact because ML said it?
Yeah, right!
Now, I think this is the truth:
mlachester:
I am close to her and I know a lot more than the media or law enforcement


do you think she might be hiding her or do you think it might be on the more sinister side?

I can only say IMO mlachester is on the sinister side -- anyone else check her background?
i haven't.  whats up with her?

go check it out and tell me what you think it all means.  Like to get your read on it.
anger issues, debt, 'used to do drugs'--who answers like that~probably someone who uses drugs imo.  i'm still trying to figure out how she became a lab tech (or that could be used in another context as well as her being a phlobmist (SP?) (some one who uses needles) and she went two what 4 or five different hs and under 'did you graduate' its all n/a.


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3 7/28/09 -
Post by: Sister on August 09, 2009, 06:31:32 PM
DD   does everybody know its 'tweakers creek' and if so ~sigh, here it comes again~ why would ww take anybody fishing there.  he's all about ecology and if he knows the area, and its history so to say, so why would he go fishing there much less with a child given the fact that its a meth hangout?

oh I must have missed that info, I never knew where ww took josh fishing, just that he took him fishing... did not know where. 

I just know the kids call it tweakers creek, (so I am told)  not sure who all knows who hangs out there. 
i don't know if he did? ::MonkeyConfused:: i could be getting it wrong and thinking that that is where the kids all hung out?  and if thats they case why in the heck kids be hanging out at a place like tweakers creek? ::MonkeyEek::

This is a quote from KaraK back in July: "Josh does not have any regular friends that I am aware of but I will ask around but I know Wayne Watne tries to help out there by taking him fishing and there may be other adults and such that have stepped in to provide friendship as well. Most of the time that I see Josh he is hanging out with Lindsey and my 10 and 11 yr old. I really wanted to add just so you know that Josh has been to my home several times with Lindsey or coming over to see if the kids were here playing and I've personally never had an issue with him and he was always very polite and respectful."


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3 7/28/09 -
Post by: Sister on August 09, 2009, 06:32:49 PM
Self-edit -- never does say where they went fishing that I know of.


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3 7/28/09 -
Post by: mamacrazy30 on August 09, 2009, 06:35:02 PM
Self-edit -- never does say where they went fishing that I know of.
it doesn't~ i'm confusing myself again ::MonkeyConfused::


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3 7/28/09 -
Post by: Tamikosmom on August 09, 2009, 06:38:30 PM
DD   does everybody know its 'tweakers creek' and if so ~sigh, here it comes again~ why would ww take anybody fishing there.  he's all about ecology and if he knows the area, and its history so to say, so why would he go fishing there much less with a child given the fact that its a meth hangout?

oh I must have missed that info, I never knew where ww took josh fishing, just that he took him fishing... did not know where. 

I just know the kids call it tweakers creek, (so I am told)  not sure who all knows who hangs out there. 


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3 7/28/09 -
Post by: mamacrazy30 on August 09, 2009, 06:43:38 PM
i'm still try to work out my feelings as ww-just a really nice guy or ww-just a really creepy guy.


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3 7/28/09 -
Post by: Tamikosmom on August 09, 2009, 06:50:48 PM
WAYNE WATNE

I am not accusing Wayne Watne of being a participant in the disappearance of Lindsey Baum but … considering the location of his residence in relation to the Baum residence ... considering the route taken by Lindsey when walking home the night she went missing … considering the time of the witness sighting on Fifth and Maple and ... considering Wayne Watne’s connection to both Josh and Lindsey ... is it possible there was an encounter with Lindsey at approximately 9:30 PM on the evening of June 26, 2009?  Has Wayne Watne been ruled out as a person of interest?

++++++++


Wayne Watne - Residential Address

400 S 3RD ST
MCCLEARY, WA 98557-9658
GRAYS HARBOR COUNTY
(05/2008-05/2008)

Credit: doubledecker

 
The Daily World – July 1, 2009

Lindsey was in Girl Scouts. She went to church at the Evergreen Christian Center in McCleary, an offshoot of a larger church in west Olympia.

http://**/articles/2009/07/01/local_news/doc4a4ba94721f78989072462.txt


The Daily World – July 1, 2009

Wayne Watne of Evergreen Christian Community in Olympia and two other local ministers said prayers for Lindsey’s return. Watne took speakers from the assembled crowd. Friends of the family stepped up, taking turns expressing their hope and their pain.

http://**/articles/2009/07/01/local_news/doc4a4baa38c6082474655699


KaraK
Re: Lindsey Baum, 10y missing from McCleary, WA 6/26/09
« Reply #1245 on: July 05, 2009, 11:23:14 PM »


Josh does not have any regular friends that I am aware of but I will ask around but I know Wayne Watne tries to help out there by taking him fishing and there may be other adults and such that have stepped in to provide friendship as well. Most of the time that I see Josh he is hanging out with Lindsey and my 10 and 11 yr old.

http://scaredmonkeys.net/index.php?topic=5541.msg865772#msg865772
 
Kara Kampen – Mother of Lindsey’s friend Michaela


Examiner - July 1, 2009

Lindsey’s Girl Scout troop leader, Becky Spalding said, “I had to tell her to be quiet because she was laughing all the time. It’s very unbelievable. You see this on the news, but you never know anyone who it’s happened to.”

Wayne Watne, a member of the Evergreen Christian Community Church and representative of Harvest Vision Ministries said prayers for Lindsey’s return.

http://www.examiner.com/x-1168-Crime-Examiner~y2009m7d1-Emotional-vigil-held-for-missing-Washington-girl-Lindsey-Baum

FBI: Stranger not likely behind girl's disappearance
Story Published: Jul 1, 2009 at 7:35 PM PDT
Story Updated: Jul 2, 2009 at 1:09 PM PDT


Experts with the National Center for Missing and Exploited Children say if the girl was abducted, it most likely wasn't by a stranger who was hiding in the bushes.

"From what knowledge we have and the information that I have that it's someone that she possibly knows, somebody that is in the area," said Henry Schmidt with the organization.

The FBI now wants neighbors to think about anyone who may have been in the area Friday night. They also want to hear about anyone suddenly engaging in strange behavior, such as not showing up for work, selling their car for no reason or changing their appearance.

"We're certainly not looking for a witch hunt or anything of that sort, but the bottom line is we have a missing girl. And so anyone who is in this area is going to be someone we want to talk to," said Ron Twersky, FBI assistant special agent in charge.

http://www.komonews.com/news/49651607.html


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3 7/28/09 -
Post by: no rose colored glasses on August 09, 2009, 06:53:03 PM
That LE would "shield" in order to cover their own butts . . . can't say it has never happened, but I haven't read a shred to indicate this might even be true, except of course from ML.  And we know this is a fact because ML said it?
Yeah, right!
Now, I think this is the truth:
mlachester:
I am close to her and I know a lot more than the media or law enforcement


do you think she might be hiding her or do you think it might be on the more sinister side?

I can only say IMO mlachester is on the sinister side -- anyone else check her background?
i haven't.  whats up with her?

go check it out and tell me what you think it all means.  Like to get your read on it.
anger issues, debt, 'used to do drugs'--who answers like that~probably someone who uses drugs imo.  i'm still trying to figure out how she became a lab tech (or that could be used in another context as well as her being a phlobmist (SP?) (some one who uses needles) and she went two what 4 or five different hs and under 'did you graduate' its all n/a.
I must have missed this, where did you read that about Marilyn?  ::MonkeyConfused::


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3 7/28/09 -
Post by: Sister on August 09, 2009, 06:57:34 PM
Mama, there is a thread here on Wayne Watne that dd started -- should give you some background.  Interesting read.


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3 7/28/09 -
Post by: Tamikosmom on August 09, 2009, 06:57:34 PM
is Roger A Marlin the roger mlachester was talkin about allegedly living in karak's house.. the reason i'm wondering is because he is listed as a witness to the wedding of mlachester and feestus lachester

http://truecrime.forums-free.com/marilyn-lachester-nee-burns-festus-lachester-iii-t676.html

 ::MonkeyShocked::


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3 7/28/09 -
Post by: Sister on August 09, 2009, 06:58:31 PM
is Roger A Marlin the roger mlachester was talkin about allegedly living in karak's house.. the reason i'm wondering is because he is listed as a witness to the wedding of mlachester and feestus lachester

http://truecrime.forums-free.com/marilyn-lachester-nee-burns-festus-lachester-iii-t676.html

no that is not the same person.


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3 7/28/09 -
Post by: Tamikosmom on August 09, 2009, 06:59:46 PM
i'm still try to work out my feelings as ww-just a really nice guy or ww-just a really creepy guy.

Wayne Watne - Missionary At Lindsey's Church; Took Josh Fishing Etc

http://scaredmonkeys.net/index.php?topic=5614.0


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3 7/28/09 -
Post by: mamacrazy30 on August 09, 2009, 07:18:41 PM
Mama, there is a thread here on Wayne Watne that dd started -- should give you some background.  Interesting read.
i've read it, its just well, imho i find him creepy but if i wasn't so jaded i could say he was trying to befriend a little boy who was from a broken home, new in town, had issues and not many friends. 


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3 7/28/09 -
Post by: melisb on August 09, 2009, 07:19:35 PM
Crawling out of my corner to offer some very off the wall hypothetical situations...Maybe (ALL IMO!!!) WW is a closet tweaker and equal opportunity (girls and boys) SO.  Tweakers have voracious sexual appetites and will grab at anything for their own pleasure at that very moment.  Maybe some of Joshs' problems are past and present sexual abuse.  God forbid, but I feel something awful has happened or happening to him now that tortures him and drives him to act in such criminal behavior.  Maybe LB was scared by something on her way home and WW swooped in to 'rescue' her.  He had enough time and know how to stash her away for later.  In a perfect world I would like to think WW sent her to a safe house.  Don't knock Mlachester just yet, some of the people that have been on the other side of the tracks and have been around the block a few times have lived harder, faster and have more street knowledge than we do.  What if the guy staying at KaraK's house that she didn't volunteer info on liked LB and followed her and grabbed her?  Something STILL bothers me about her (KaraK)!!!!  LB knew him and would've gotten in the car with him for a ride home possibly.  IDK but this little girl needs a saving grace.  Someone please help her!  Bring in the State Police if their police force isn't strong enough.  Slinking back into my corner now......   


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3 7/28/09 -
Post by: mamacrazy30 on August 09, 2009, 07:20:08 PM
That LE would "shield" in order to cover their own butts . . . can't say it has never happened, but I haven't read a shred to indicate this might even be true, except of course from ML.  And we know this is a fact because ML said it?
Yeah, right!
Now, I think this is the truth:
mlachester:
I am close to her and I know a lot more than the media or law enforcement


do you think she might be hiding her or do you think it might be on the more sinister side?

I can only say IMO mlachester is on the sinister side -- anyone else check her background?
i haven't.  whats up with her?

go check it out and tell me what you think it all means.  Like to get your read on it.
anger issues, debt, 'used to do drugs'--who answers like that~probably someone who uses drugs imo.  i'm still trying to figure out how she became a lab tech (or that could be used in another context as well as her being a phlobmist (SP?) (some one who uses needles) and she went two what 4 or five different hs and under 'did you graduate' its all n/a.
I must have missed this, where did you read that about Marilyn?  ::MonkeyConfused::
go to DD's avi and click on her little globe.


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3 7/28/09 -
Post by: mamacrazy30 on August 09, 2009, 07:26:44 PM
Crawling out of my corner to offer some very off the wall hypothetical situations...Maybe (ALL IMO!!!) WW is a closet tweaker and equal opportunity (girls and boys) SO.  Tweakers have voracious sexual appetites and will grab at anything for their own pleasure at that very moment.  Maybe some of Joshs' problems are past and present sexual abuse.  God forbid, but I feel something awful has happened or happening to him now that tortures him and drives him to act in such criminal behavior.  Maybe LB was scared by something on her way home and WW swooped in to 'rescue' her.  He had enough time and know how to stash her away for later.  In a perfect world I would like to think WW sent her to a safe house.  Don't knock Mlachester just yet, some of the people that have been on the other side of the tracks and have been around the block a few times have lived harder, faster and have more street knowledge than we do.  What if the guy staying at KaraK's house that she didn't volunteer info on liked LB and followed her and grabbed her?  Something STILL bothers me about her (KaraK)!!!!  LB knew him and would've gotten in the car with him for a ride home possibly.  IDK but this little girl needs a saving grace.  Someone please help her!  Bring in the State Police if their police force isn't strong enough.  Slinking back into my corner now......   
any of that could be true.  the town is infested with drugs and almost a safe-haven for SO's.  it wouldn't shock me if everyone in the town knew of some dirty little tid-bit about each other.  i just don't see McCleary as the wholesome all the kids play in the streets and hang out with each other all the time town.  and if the kids are all running around the town all the time, well, maybe that has something to do with what their parents are doing at home.


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3 7/28/09 -
Post by: Sister on August 09, 2009, 07:39:44 PM
Crawling out of my corner to offer some very off the wall hypothetical situations...Maybe (ALL IMO!!!) WW is a closet tweaker and equal opportunity (girls and boys) SO.  Tweakers have voracious sexual appetites and will grab at anything for their own pleasure at that very moment.  Maybe some of Joshs' problems are past and present sexual abuse.  God forbid, but I feel something awful has happened or happening to him now that tortures him and drives him to act in such criminal behavior.  Maybe LB was scared by something on her way home and WW swooped in to 'rescue' her.  He had enough time and know how to stash her away for later.  In a perfect world I would like to think WW sent her to a safe house.  Don't knock Mlachester just yet, some of the people that have been on the other side of the tracks and have been around the block a few times have lived harder, faster and have more street knowledge than we do.  What if the guy staying at KaraK's house that she didn't volunteer info on liked LB and followed her and grabbed her?  Something STILL bothers me about her (KaraK)!!!!  LB knew him and would've gotten in the car with him for a ride home possibly.  IDK but this little girl needs a saving grace.  Someone please help her!  Bring in the State Police if their police force isn't strong enough.  Slinking back into my corner now......   
any of that could be true.  the town is infested with drugs and almost a safe-haven for SO's.  it wouldn't shock me if everyone in the town knew of some dirty little tid-bit about each other.  i just don't see McCleary as the wholesome all the kids play in the streets and hang out with each other all the time town.  and if the kids are all running around the town all the time, well, maybe that has something to do with what their parents are doing at home.

Mama, the town is infested with drugs . . . did I miss that source?  there has been suggestions that some residents do drugs (and in which town would that not be true?), but I hadn't seen anything to indicate an infestation nor it being a safe-haven for SOs.  Link me up there Mama :>)


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3 7/28/09 -
Post by: melisb on August 09, 2009, 07:41:30 PM
You are right Mama.  Don't get me wrong, I have no knowledge of drug use by any person in town but who does let their kids run free at that time of night?  I don't care what percentage of light is left, it's nearly bedtime for lots of kids at her age.  Parents that don't want to be bothered by their children get to run around unsupervised.  What was KaraK, her BF, other roomie doing that was so important that they couldn't help her get home?  Some folks just need to be shook till they come to their senses.  Look forward to see all the brainstorming here.  You go DD!!!  Check this so called roomie out please.  You've run down everything else I have asked of you and it is so appreciated.  Your a gem just like all the other Monkey's here.  If I don't post again for a while please have great evening and a Blessed Day tomorrow!  God Bless Lindsey, Caylee, Haliegh, Tracy, Jennifer, Adji, Sandra, Robert...oh my heart is so heavy with pain and sorrow, it cries for them all and too many to list but just as important as the ones already listed.


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3 7/28/09 -
Post by: mamacrazy30 on August 09, 2009, 07:44:01 PM
no links jmo..you have young kids calling a place 'tweakers creek' and for some reason we keep finding so after so in and around the area.  i'm not saying all the residents of McCleary are drug users but for such a small town there seems to be a big under current of seedy behavior.


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3 7/28/09 -
Post by: doubledecker on August 09, 2009, 07:48:12 PM
WAYNE WATNE

I am not accusing Wayne Watne of being a participant in the disappearance of Lindsey Baum but … considering the location of his residence in relation to the Baum residence ... considering the route taken by Lindsey when walking home the night she went missing … considering the time of the witness sighting on Fifth and Maple and ... considering Wayne Watne’s connection to both Josh and Lindsey ... is it possible there was an encounter with Lindsey at approximately 9:30 PM on the evening of June 26, 2009?  Has Wayne Watne been ruled out as a person of interest?

++++++++


Wayne Watne - Residential Address

400 S 3RD ST
MCCLEARY, WA 98557-9658
GRAYS HARBOR COUNTY
(05/2008-05/2008)

Credit: doubledecker

 
The Daily World – July 1, 2009

Lindsey was in Girl Scouts. She went to church at the Evergreen Christian Center in McCleary, an offshoot of a larger church in west Olympia.

http://**/articles/2009/07/01/local_news/doc4a4ba94721f78989072462.txt


The Daily World – July 1, 2009

Wayne Watne of Evergreen Christian Community in Olympia and two other local ministers said prayers for Lindsey’s return. Watne took speakers from the assembled crowd. Friends of the family stepped up, taking turns expressing their hope and their pain.

http://**/articles/2009/07/01/local_news/doc4a4baa38c6082474655699


KaraK
Re: Lindsey Baum, 10y missing from McCleary, WA 6/26/09
« Reply #1245 on: July 05, 2009, 11:23:14 PM »


Josh does not have any regular friends that I am aware of but I will ask around but I know Wayne Watne tries to help out there by taking him fishing and there may be other adults and such that have stepped in to provide friendship as well. Most of the time that I see Josh he is hanging out with Lindsey and my 10 and 11 yr old.

http://scaredmonkeys.net/index.php?topic=5541.msg865772#msg865772
 
Kara Kampen – Mother of Lindsey’s friend Michaela


Examiner - July 1, 2009

Lindsey’s Girl Scout troop leader, Becky Spalding said, “I had to tell her to be quiet because she was laughing all the time. It’s very unbelievable. You see this on the news, but you never know anyone who it’s happened to.”

Wayne Watne, a member of the Evergreen Christian Community Church and representative of Harvest Vision Ministries said prayers for Lindsey’s return.

http://www.examiner.com/x-1168-Crime-Examiner~y2009m7d1-Emotional-vigil-held-for-missing-Washington-girl-Lindsey-Baum

FBI: Stranger not likely behind girl's disappearance
Story Published: Jul 1, 2009 at 7:35 PM PDT
Story Updated: Jul 2, 2009 at 1:09 PM PDT


Experts with the National Center for Missing and Exploited Children say if the girl was abducted, it most likely wasn't by a stranger who was hiding in the bushes.

"From what knowledge we have and the information that I have that it's someone that she possibly knows, somebody that is in the area," said Henry Schmidt with the organization.

The FBI now wants neighbors to think about anyone who may have been in the area Friday night. They also want to hear about anyone suddenly engaging in strange behavior, such as not showing up for work, selling their car for no reason or changing their appearance.

"We're certainly not looking for a witch hunt or anything of that sort, but the bottom line is we have a missing girl. And so anyone who is in this area is going to be someone we want to talk to," said Ron Twersky, FBI assistant special agent in charge.

http://www.komonews.com/news/49651607.html


I was TOLD(whatever that is worth LOL) ww has a rock solid alibi.


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3 7/28/09 -
Post by: sunshine12 on August 09, 2009, 07:50:08 PM
Crawling out of my corner to offer some very off the wall hypothetical situations...Maybe (ALL IMO!!!) WW is a closet tweaker and equal opportunity (girls and boys) SO.  Tweakers have voracious sexual appetites and will grab at anything for their own pleasure at that very moment.  Maybe some of Joshs' problems are past and present sexual abuse.  God forbid, but I feel something awful has happened or happening to him now that tortures him and drives him to act in such criminal behavior.  Maybe LB was scared by something on her way home and WW swooped in to 'rescue' her.  He had enough time and know how to stash her away for later.  In a perfect world I would like to think WW sent her to a safe house.  Don't knock Mlachester just yet, some of the people that have been on the other side of the tracks and have been around the block a few times have lived harder, faster and have more street knowledge than we do.  What if the guy staying at KaraK's house that she didn't volunteer info on liked LB and followed her and grabbed her?  Something STILL bothers me about her (KaraK)!!!!  LB knew him and would've gotten in the car with him for a ride home possibly.  IDK but this little girl needs a saving grace.  Someone please help her!  Bring in the State Police if their police force isn't strong enough.  Slinking back into my corner now......   

this could all very well be possible


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3 7/28/09 -
Post by: doubledecker on August 09, 2009, 07:50:37 PM
is Roger A Marlin the roger mlachester was talkin about allegedly living in karak's house.. the reason i'm wondering is because he is listed as a witness to the wedding of mlachester and feestus lachester

http://truecrime.forums-free.com/marilyn-lachester-nee-burns-festus-lachester-iii-t676.html

 ::MonkeyShocked::

this is NOT the same roger.  roger(who marilyn talked about w/broken rib has never been mentioned anywhere that I know of.


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3 7/28/09 -
Post by: no rose colored glasses on August 09, 2009, 07:55:52 PM
Crawling out of my corner to offer some very off the wall hypothetical situations...Maybe (ALL IMO!!!) WW is a closet tweaker and equal opportunity (girls and boys) SO.  Tweakers have voracious sexual appetites and will grab at anything for their own pleasure at that very moment.  Maybe some of Joshs' problems are past and present sexual abuse.  God forbid, but I feel something awful has happened or happening to him now that tortures him and drives him to act in such criminal behavior.  Maybe LB was scared by something on her way home and WW swooped in to 'rescue' her.  He had enough time and know how to stash her away for later.  In a perfect world I would like to think WW sent her to a safe house.  Don't knock Mlachester just yet, some of the people that have been on the other side of the tracks and have been around the block a few times have lived harder, faster and have more street knowledge than we do.  What if the guy staying at KaraK's house that she didn't volunteer info on liked LB and followed her and grabbed her?  Something STILL bothers me about her (KaraK)!!!!  LB knew him and would've gotten in the car with him for a ride home possibly.  IDK but this little girl needs a saving grace.  Someone please help her!  Bring in the State Police if their police force isn't strong enough.  Slinking back into my corner now......   
Please don't slink back in the corner, very interesting and I have some nagging thoughts about Kara, just can't explain exactly.


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3 7/28/09 -
Post by: doubledecker on August 09, 2009, 07:59:06 PM
You are right Mama.  Don't get me wrong, I have no knowledge of drug use by any person in town but who does let their kids run free at that time of night?  I don't care what percentage of light is left, it's nearly bedtime for lots of kids at her age.  Parents that don't want to be bothered by their children get to run around unsupervised.  What was KaraK, her BF, other roomie doing that was so important that they couldn't help her get home?  Some folks just need to be shook till they come to their senses.  Look forward to see all the brainstorming here.  You go DD!!!  Check this so called roomie out please.  You've run down everything else I have asked of you and it is so appreciated.  Your a gem just like all the other Monkey's here.  If I don't post again for a while please have great evening and a Blessed Day tomorrow!  God Bless Lindsey, Caylee, Haliegh, Tracy, Jennifer, Adji, Sandra, Robert...oh my heart is so heavy with pain and sorrow, it cries for them all and too many to list but just as important as the ones already listed.

I have enough info to find out exactly who this guy is and will find out who he knows and I will find out who is lying about this guy for sure.  I have his name, his work, his background, where he hangs out.  now to find out who he connects to, and I am sure someone will be checking up on this guy to see if he really did crawl through kara's window and got a broken rib.  to tell you the truth I do not believe he did, but as always, even if I think one way, I will look to see if I am wrong.


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3 7/28/09 -
Post by: Tamikosmom on August 09, 2009, 07:59:08 PM
WAYNE WATNE

I am not accusing Wayne Watne of being a participant in the disappearance of Lindsey Baum but … considering the location of his residence in relation to the Baum residence ... considering the route taken by Lindsey when walking home the night she went missing … considering the time of the witness sighting on Fifth and Maple and ... considering Wayne Watne’s connection to both Josh and Lindsey ... is it possible there was an encounter with Lindsey at approximately 9:30 PM on the evening of June 26, 2009?  Has Wayne Watne been ruled out as a person of interest?

++++++++


Wayne Watne - Residential Address

400 S 3RD ST
MCCLEARY, WA 98557-9658
GRAYS HARBOR COUNTY
(05/2008-05/2008)

Credit: doubledecker

 
The Daily World – July 1, 2009

Lindsey was in Girl Scouts. She went to church at the Evergreen Christian Center in McCleary, an offshoot of a larger church in west Olympia.

http://**/articles/2009/07/01/local_news/doc4a4ba94721f78989072462.txt


The Daily World – July 1, 2009

Wayne Watne of Evergreen Christian Community in Olympia and two other local ministers said prayers for Lindsey’s return. Watne took speakers from the assembled crowd. Friends of the family stepped up, taking turns expressing their hope and their pain.

http://**/articles/2009/07/01/local_news/doc4a4baa38c6082474655699


KaraK
Re: Lindsey Baum, 10y missing from McCleary, WA 6/26/09
« Reply #1245 on: July 05, 2009, 11:23:14 PM »


Josh does not have any regular friends that I am aware of but I will ask around but I know Wayne Watne tries to help out there by taking him fishing and there may be other adults and such that have stepped in to provide friendship as well. Most of the time that I see Josh he is hanging out with Lindsey and my 10 and 11 yr old.

http://scaredmonkeys.net/index.php?topic=5541.msg865772#msg865772
 
Kara Kampen – Mother of Lindsey’s friend Michaela


Examiner - July 1, 2009

Lindsey’s Girl Scout troop leader, Becky Spalding said, “I had to tell her to be quiet because she was laughing all the time. It’s very unbelievable. You see this on the news, but you never know anyone who it’s happened to.”

Wayne Watne, a member of the Evergreen Christian Community Church and representative of Harvest Vision Ministries said prayers for Lindsey’s return.

http://www.examiner.com/x-1168-Crime-Examiner~y2009m7d1-Emotional-vigil-held-for-missing-Washington-girl-Lindsey-Baum

FBI: Stranger not likely behind girl's disappearance
Story Published: Jul 1, 2009 at 7:35 PM PDT
Story Updated: Jul 2, 2009 at 1:09 PM PDT


Experts with the National Center for Missing and Exploited Children say if the girl was abducted, it most likely wasn't by a stranger who was hiding in the bushes.

"From what knowledge we have and the information that I have that it's someone that she possibly knows, somebody that is in the area," said Henry Schmidt with the organization.

The FBI now wants neighbors to think about anyone who may have been in the area Friday night. They also want to hear about anyone suddenly engaging in strange behavior, such as not showing up for work, selling their car for no reason or changing their appearance.

"We're certainly not looking for a witch hunt or anything of that sort, but the bottom line is we have a missing girl. And so anyone who is in this area is going to be someone we want to talk to," said Ron Twersky, FBI assistant special agent in charge.

http://www.komonews.com/news/49651607.html


I was TOLD(whatever that is worth LOL) ww has a rock solid alibi.

Thanks DD.

If Wayne Watne has been eliminated as a person of interest in the Lindsey Baum investigation ...in all probability ... this guy was on a spirtual mission to make a positive difference in the life of Josh Baum.

Janet

 


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3 7/28/09 -
Post by: mamacrazy30 on August 09, 2009, 07:59:55 PM
WAYNE WATNE

I am not accusing Wayne Watne of being a participant in the disappearance of Lindsey Baum but … considering the location of his residence in relation to the Baum residence ... considering the route taken by Lindsey when walking home the night she went missing … considering the time of the witness sighting on Fifth and Maple and ... considering Wayne Watne’s connection to both Josh and Lindsey ... is it possible there was an encounter with Lindsey at approximately 9:30 PM on the evening of June 26, 2009?  Has Wayne Watne been ruled out as a person of interest?

++++++++


Wayne Watne - Residential Address

400 S 3RD ST
MCCLEARY, WA 98557-9658
GRAYS HARBOR COUNTY
(05/2008-05/2008)

Credit: doubledecker

 
The Daily World – July 1, 2009

Lindsey was in Girl Scouts. She went to church at the Evergreen Christian Center in McCleary, an offshoot of a larger church in west Olympia.

http://**/articles/2009/07/01/local_news/doc4a4ba94721f78989072462.txt


The Daily World – July 1, 2009

Wayne Watne of Evergreen Christian Community in Olympia and two other local ministers said prayers for Lindsey’s return. Watne took speakers from the assembled crowd. Friends of the family stepped up, taking turns expressing their hope and their pain.

http://**/articles/2009/07/01/local_news/doc4a4baa38c6082474655699


KaraK
Re: Lindsey Baum, 10y missing from McCleary, WA 6/26/09
« Reply #1245 on: July 05, 2009, 11:23:14 PM »


Josh does not have any regular friends that I am aware of but I will ask around but I know Wayne Watne tries to help out there by taking him fishing and there may be other adults and such that have stepped in to provide friendship as well. Most of the time that I see Josh he is hanging out with Lindsey and my 10 and 11 yr old.

http://scaredmonkeys.net/index.php?topic=5541.msg865772#msg865772
 
Kara Kampen – Mother of Lindsey’s friend Michaela


Examiner - July 1, 2009

Lindsey’s Girl Scout troop leader, Becky Spalding said, “I had to tell her to be quiet because she was laughing all the time. It’s very unbelievable. You see this on the news, but you never know anyone who it’s happened to.”

Wayne Watne, a member of the Evergreen Christian Community Church and representative of Harvest Vision Ministries said prayers for Lindsey’s return.

http://www.examiner.com/x-1168-Crime-Examiner~y2009m7d1-Emotional-vigil-held-for-missing-Washington-girl-Lindsey-Baum

FBI: Stranger not likely behind girl's disappearance
Story Published: Jul 1, 2009 at 7:35 PM PDT
Story Updated: Jul 2, 2009 at 1:09 PM PDT


Experts with the National Center for Missing and Exploited Children say if the girl was abducted, it most likely wasn't by a stranger who was hiding in the bushes.

"From what knowledge we have and the information that I have that it's someone that she possibly knows, somebody that is in the area," said Henry Schmidt with the organization.

The FBI now wants neighbors to think about anyone who may have been in the area Friday night. They also want to hear about anyone suddenly engaging in strange behavior, such as not showing up for work, selling their car for no reason or changing their appearance.

"We're certainly not looking for a witch hunt or anything of that sort, but the bottom line is we have a missing girl. And so anyone who is in this area is going to be someone we want to talk to," said Ron Twersky, FBI assistant special agent in charge.

http://www.komonews.com/news/49651607.html


I was TOLD(whatever that is worth LOL) ww has a rock solid alibi.
he very well could on the flip side he could have a rock solid alibi for that point in time.  heck, i think the whole town is in on it, or at least the majority.  and yes i am a paranoid person!


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3 7/28/09 -
Post by: Tamikosmom on August 09, 2009, 08:01:21 PM
is Roger A Marlin the roger mlachester was talkin about allegedly living in karak's house.. the reason i'm wondering is because he is listed as a witness to the wedding of mlachester and feestus lachester

http://truecrime.forums-free.com/marilyn-lachester-nee-burns-festus-lachester-iii-t676.html

 ::MonkeyShocked::

this is NOT the same roger.  roger(who marilyn talked about w/broken rib has never been mentioned anywhere that I know of.

GOTTCHA!!!

 ::MonkeyHaHa::

Janet


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3 7/28/09 -
Post by: doubledecker on August 09, 2009, 08:03:07 PM
WAYNE WATNE

I am not accusing Wayne Watne of being a participant in the disappearance of Lindsey Baum but … considering the location of his residence in relation to the Baum residence ... considering the route taken by Lindsey when walking home the night she went missing … considering the time of the witness sighting on Fifth and Maple and ... considering Wayne Watne’s connection to both Josh and Lindsey ... is it possible there was an encounter with Lindsey at approximately 9:30 PM on the evening of June 26, 2009?  Has Wayne Watne been ruled out as a person of interest?

++++++++


Wayne Watne - Residential Address

400 S 3RD ST
MCCLEARY, WA 98557-9658
GRAYS HARBOR COUNTY
(05/2008-05/2008)

Credit: doubledecker

 
The Daily World – July 1, 2009

Lindsey was in Girl Scouts. She went to church at the Evergreen Christian Center in McCleary, an offshoot of a larger church in west Olympia.

http://**/articles/2009/07/01/local_news/doc4a4ba94721f78989072462.txt


The Daily World – July 1, 2009

Wayne Watne of Evergreen Christian Community in Olympia and two other local ministers said prayers for Lindsey’s return. Watne took speakers from the assembled crowd. Friends of the family stepped up, taking turns expressing their hope and their pain.

http://**/articles/2009/07/01/local_news/doc4a4baa38c6082474655699


KaraK
Re: Lindsey Baum, 10y missing from McCleary, WA 6/26/09
« Reply #1245 on: July 05, 2009, 11:23:14 PM »


Josh does not have any regular friends that I am aware of but I will ask around but I know Wayne Watne tries to help out there by taking him fishing and there may be other adults and such that have stepped in to provide friendship as well. Most of the time that I see Josh he is hanging out with Lindsey and my 10 and 11 yr old.

http://scaredmonkeys.net/index.php?topic=5541.msg865772#msg865772
 
Kara Kampen – Mother of Lindsey’s friend Michaela


Examiner - July 1, 2009

Lindsey’s Girl Scout troop leader, Becky Spalding said, “I had to tell her to be quiet because she was laughing all the time. It’s very unbelievable. You see this on the news, but you never know anyone who it’s happened to.”

Wayne Watne, a member of the Evergreen Christian Community Church and representative of Harvest Vision Ministries said prayers for Lindsey’s return.

http://www.examiner.com/x-1168-Crime-Examiner~y2009m7d1-Emotional-vigil-held-for-missing-Washington-girl-Lindsey-Baum

FBI: Stranger not likely behind girl's disappearance
Story Published: Jul 1, 2009 at 7:35 PM PDT
Story Updated: Jul 2, 2009 at 1:09 PM PDT


Experts with the National Center for Missing and Exploited Children say if the girl was abducted, it most likely wasn't by a stranger who was hiding in the bushes.

"From what knowledge we have and the information that I have that it's someone that she possibly knows, somebody that is in the area," said Henry Schmidt with the organization.

The FBI now wants neighbors to think about anyone who may have been in the area Friday night. They also want to hear about anyone suddenly engaging in strange behavior, such as not showing up for work, selling their car for no reason or changing their appearance.

"We're certainly not looking for a witch hunt or anything of that sort, but the bottom line is we have a missing girl. And so anyone who is in this area is going to be someone we want to talk to," said Ron Twersky, FBI assistant special agent in charge.

http://www.komonews.com/news/49651607.html


I was TOLD(whatever that is worth LOL) ww has a rock solid alibi.

Thanks DD.

If Wayne Watne has been eliminated as a person of interest in the Lindsey Baum investigation ...in all probability ... this guy was on a spirtual mission to make a positive difference in the life of Josh Baum.

Janet

 

well just because I was TOLD WW HAS A ROCK SOLID ALIBI, does not mean it is true, but it MOST LIKELY is true.


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3 7/28/09 -
Post by: mamacrazy30 on August 09, 2009, 08:03:44 PM
You are right Mama.  Don't get me wrong, I have no knowledge of drug use by any person in town but who does let their kids run free at that time of night?  I don't care what percentage of light is left, it's nearly bedtime for lots of kids at her age.  Parents that don't want to be bothered by their children get to run around unsupervised.  What was KaraK, her BF, other roomie doing that was so important that they couldn't help her get home?  Some folks just need to be shook till they come to their senses.  Look forward to see all the brainstorming here.  You go DD!!!  Check this so called roomie out please.  You've run down everything else I have asked of you and it is so appreciated.  Your a gem just like all the other Monkey's here.  If I don't post again for a while please have great evening and a Blessed Day tomorrow!  God Bless Lindsey, Caylee, Haliegh, Tracy, Jennifer, Adji, Sandra, Robert...oh my heart is so heavy with pain and sorrow, it cries for them all and too many to list but just as important as the ones already listed.

I have enough info to find out exactly who this guy is and will find out who he knows and I will find out who is lying about this guy for sure.  I have his name, his work, his background, where he hangs out.  now to find out who he connects to, and I am sure someone will be checking up on this guy to see if he really did crawl through kara's window and got a broken rib.  to tell you the truth I do not believe he did, but as always, even if I think one way, I will look to see if I am wrong.
i this point do we know there really is a rodger..if he does exists and ml was on such good terms with him why wasn't he staying at her house?  at this point i am so flustered i could think anything and none of it good.


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3 7/28/09 -
Post by: no rose colored glasses on August 09, 2009, 08:08:56 PM
I know I've seen this question asked several times, but I don't recall an answer, does Melissa have a boyfriend?


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3 7/28/09 -
Post by: KarmaRoundUp on August 09, 2009, 08:14:20 PM
You are right Mama.  Don't get me wrong, I have no knowledge of drug use by any person in town but who does let their kids run free at that time of night?  I don't care what percentage of light is left, it's nearly bedtime for lots of kids at her age.  Parents that don't want to be bothered by their children get to run around unsupervised.  What was KaraK, her BF, other roomie doing that was so important that they couldn't help her get home?  Some folks just need to be shook till they come to their senses.  Look forward to see all the brainstorming here.  You go DD!!!  Check this so called roomie out please.  You've run down everything else I have asked of you and it is so appreciated.  Your a gem just like all the other Monkey's here.  If I don't post again for a while please have great evening and a Blessed Day tomorrow!  God Bless Lindsey, Caylee, Haliegh, Tracy, Jennifer, Adji, Sandra, Robert...oh my heart is so heavy with pain and sorrow, it cries for them all and too many to list but just as important as the ones already listed.

I have enough info to find out exactly who this guy is and will find out who he knows and I will find out who is lying about this guy for sure.  I have his name, his work, his background, where he hangs out.  now to find out who he connects to, and I am sure someone will be checking up on this guy to see if he really did crawl through kara's window and got a broken rib.  to tell you the truth I do not believe he did, but as always, even if I think one way, I will look to see if I am wrong.
IF it was supposed to be a basement window he climbed thru it wasn't KaraK's house because she has no basement.And if this supposedly happened while Kara,Melissa and Scott were looking for Lindsey,wasn't Kara's kids at home?Or did she pile them all in the truck/car/van?


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3 7/28/09 -
Post by: atlanta_mom on August 09, 2009, 08:15:34 PM
WW may be an honest, trustworthy person who only wants to help.  Unfortunately in this day and age, I don't think most men would isolate a young boy and take him somewhere- fishing or what not.  I, myself, would not let my son go off with someone that isn't blood related (and even then I would think twice about it).  Alot of the SO hide behind a boy scout badge, a church or school.  But, then again, I might just be jaded.


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3 7/28/09 -
Post by: doubledecker on August 09, 2009, 08:19:56 PM
You are right Mama.  Don't get me wrong, I have no knowledge of drug use by any person in town but who does let their kids run free at that time of night?  I don't care what percentage of light is left, it's nearly bedtime for lots of kids at her age.  Parents that don't want to be bothered by their children get to run around unsupervised.  What was KaraK, her BF, other roomie doing that was so important that they couldn't help her get home?  Some folks just need to be shook till they come to their senses.  Look forward to see all the brainstorming here.  You go DD!!!  Check this so called roomie out please.  You've run down everything else I have asked of you and it is so appreciated.  Your a gem just like all the other Monkey's here.  If I don't post again for a while please have great evening and a Blessed Day tomorrow!  God Bless Lindsey, Caylee, Haliegh, Tracy, Jennifer, Adji, Sandra, Robert...oh my heart is so heavy with pain and sorrow, it cries for them all and too many to list but just as important as the ones already listed.

I have enough info to find out exactly who this guy is and will find out who he knows and I will find out who is lying about this guy for sure.  I have his name, his work, his background, where he hangs out.  now to find out who he connects to, and I am sure someone will be checking up on this guy to see if he really did crawl through kara's window and got a broken rib.  to tell you the truth I do not believe he did, but as always, even if I think one way, I will look to see if I am wrong.
i this point do we know there really is a rodger..if he does exists and ml was on such good terms with him why wasn't he staying at her house?  at this point i am so flustered i could think anything and none of it good.

well I have roger's name(who it is supposed to be) and from there I have dug up stuff, and so I know he exists, just was he ever at kara's or does marilyn really know this guy who knows ... I'll find out


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3 7/28/09 -
Post by: doubledecker on August 09, 2009, 08:23:13 PM
You are right Mama.  Don't get me wrong, I have no knowledge of drug use by any person in town but who does let their kids run free at that time of night?  I don't care what percentage of light is left, it's nearly bedtime for lots of kids at her age.  Parents that don't want to be bothered by their children get to run around unsupervised.  What was KaraK, her BF, other roomie doing that was so important that they couldn't help her get home?  Some folks just need to be shook till they come to their senses.  Look forward to see all the brainstorming here.  You go DD!!!  Check this so called roomie out please.  You've run down everything else I have asked of you and it is so appreciated.  Your a gem just like all the other Monkey's here.  If I don't post again for a while please have great evening and a Blessed Day tomorrow!  God Bless Lindsey, Caylee, Haliegh, Tracy, Jennifer, Adji, Sandra, Robert...oh my heart is so heavy with pain and sorrow, it cries for them all and too many to list but just as important as the ones already listed.

I have enough info to find out exactly who this guy is and will find out who he knows and I will find out who is lying about this guy for sure.  I have his name, his work, his background, where he hangs out.  now to find out who he connects to, and I am sure someone will be checking up on this guy to see if he really did crawl through kara's window and got a broken rib.  to tell you the truth I do not believe he did, but as always, even if I think one way, I will look to see if I am wrong.
IF it was supposed to be a basement window he climbed thru it wasn't KaraK's house because she has no basement.And if this supposedly happened while Kara,Melissa and Scott were looking for Lindsey,wasn't Kara's kids at home?Or did she pile them all in the truck/car/van?

there was no mention of a basement window, just a window, the basement part was from tomikasmom wondering if it were a basement window. 

no mention at all of basement from ME


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3 7/28/09 -
Post by: Tamikosmom on August 09, 2009, 08:26:15 PM
WW may be an honest, trustworthy person who only wants to help.  Unfortunately in this day and age, I don't think most men would isolate a young boy and take him somewhere- fishing or what not.  I, myself, would not let my son go off with someone that isn't blood related (and even then I would think twice about it).  Alot of the SO hide behind a boy scout badge, a church or school.  But, then again, I might just be jaded.

I believe the majority of youth leaders have honorable intentions but ... nowadays parents are so skeptical and ... should be.  Parents have been entrusted with a God-given responsibility to protect their children from anticipated dangers.

Also ... organizations go out of their way to protect themselves.  Our church requires criminal backgrounds each year of all teachers/leaders who come in contact with children and young people.  Teachers/leaders are not allowed to touch/embrace children/young people except to put one arm around the shoulder.  Two representatives of the church must be represented on all church organized activities outside of the church setting.  The list goes on and one ...

Janet


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3 7/28/09 -
Post by: KarmaRoundUp on August 09, 2009, 08:26:33 PM
You are right Mama.  Don't get me wrong, I have no knowledge of drug use by any person in town but who does let their kids run free at that time of night?  I don't care what percentage of light is left, it's nearly bedtime for lots of kids at her age.  Parents that don't want to be bothered by their children get to run around unsupervised.  What was KaraK, her BF, other roomie doing that was so important that they couldn't help her get home?  Some folks just need to be shook till they come to their senses.  Look forward to see all the brainstorming here.  You go DD!!!  Check this so called roomie out please.  You've run down everything else I have asked of you and it is so appreciated.  Your a gem just like all the other Monkey's here.  If I don't post again for a while please have great evening and a Blessed Day tomorrow!  God Bless Lindsey, Caylee, Haliegh, Tracy, Jennifer, Adji, Sandra, Robert...oh my heart is so heavy with pain and sorrow, it cries for them all and too many to list but just as important as the ones already listed.

I have enough info to find out exactly who this guy is and will find out who he knows and I will find out who is lying about this guy for sure.  I have his name, his work, his background, where he hangs out.  now to find out who he connects to, and I am sure someone will be checking up on this guy to see if he really did crawl through kara's window and got a broken rib.  to tell you the truth I do not believe he did, but as always, even if I think one way, I will look to see if I am wrong.
IF it was supposed to be a basement window he climbed thru it wasn't KaraK's house because she has no basement.And if this supposedly happened while Kara,Melissa and Scott were looking for Lindsey,wasn't Kara's kids at home?Or did she pile them all in the truck/car/van?

there was no mention of a basement window, just a window, the basement part was from tomikasmom wondering if it were a basement window. 

no mention at all of basement from ME
Thanks DD
So no basement window.Was this supposed to have happened the night Lindsey went missing?


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3 7/28/09 -
Post by: shortcake on August 09, 2009, 08:30:01 PM
 ::MonkeyRoll:: Friday night would have been entertainment night(Karaoke) I believe at local bar.  Anyone sitting outside on bench smoking would have a clear view of Maple Street just one block away.  I hope this was investigated for anyone seeing something out of the norm.  Also was there a patrolman on duty that night?  I believe there usually is someone on duty on the weekends and LB's route home would put her within 1/2 block of police station.  No one heard or seen anything is difficult to believe.  If someone has information about this guy with broken rib could have some connection with case should report it to local LE.  Let them determine if it is worthy or not.  Not to do so would be criminal.  Any information could rule someone in or out and help in the investigation.  I believe they have someone or persons of interest, but don't have enough for an arrest. IMO 


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3 7/28/09 -
Post by: mamacrazy30 on August 09, 2009, 08:32:34 PM
You are right Mama.  Don't get me wrong, I have no knowledge of drug use by any person in town but who does let their kids run free at that time of night?  I don't care what percentage of light is left, it's nearly bedtime for lots of kids at her age.  Parents that don't want to be bothered by their children get to run around unsupervised.  What was KaraK, her BF, other roomie doing that was so important that they couldn't help her get home?  Some folks just need to be shook till they come to their senses.  Look forward to see all the brainstorming here.  You go DD!!!  Check this so called roomie out please.  You've run down everything else I have asked of you and it is so appreciated.  Your a gem just like all the other Monkey's here.  If I don't post again for a while please have great evening and a Blessed Day tomorrow!  God Bless Lindsey, Caylee, Haliegh, Tracy, Jennifer, Adji, Sandra, Robert...oh my heart is so heavy with pain and sorrow, it cries for them all and too many to list but just as important as the ones already listed.

I have enough info to find out exactly who this guy is and will find out who he knows and I will find out who is lying about this guy for sure.  I have his name, his work, his background, where he hangs out.  now to find out who he connects to, and I am sure someone will be checking up on this guy to see if he really did crawl through kara's window and got a broken rib.  to tell you the truth I do not believe he did, but as always, even if I think one way, I will look to see if I am wrong.
i this point do we know there really is a rodger..if he does exists and ml was on such good terms with him why wasn't he staying at her house?  at this point i am so flustered i could think anything and none of it good.

well I have roger's name(who it is supposed to be) and from there I have dug up stuff, and so I know he exists, just was he ever at kara's or does marilyn really know this guy who knows ... I'll find out
well if he really did break his rib i don't think he would get any medical attention for it.  there is nothing they could really do and imo if this guy is getting into peoples houses via the window (it this has even really happened?) he doesn't strike me as the type to go to the hospital. jmo


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3 7/28/09 -
Post by: Tamikosmom on August 09, 2009, 08:33:12 PM

there was no mention of a basement window, just a window, the basement part was from tomikasmom wondering if it were a basement window. 

no mention at all of basement from ME

DD ... it was just speculation in regards to a tenant who was locked out of his accommodations and ... was forced to "break in".

Janet

+++++++

Could it be that the Kampen/Williams residence has a rental accommodation separate from the main house.

Janet

+++++++

Quote from: sunshine12 on July 05, 2009, 06:42:50 PM

i also am curious as to who exactly was in the kampen home the night that lindsey disappeared?


KaraK
Re: Lindsey Baum, 10y missing from McCleary, WA 6/26/09
« Reply #1163 on: July 05, 2009, 06:52:39 PM »


My house - Myself, Scott and my 4 kids.

http://scaredmonkeys.net/index.php?topic=5541.msg865334;topicseen#msg865334

I am told in a previous email that he is a  "roommate" of kara.  that sounds like same house to me.

If Kara Kampen, Scott Williams and four kids were in the house why would a roommate feel the need to crawl through a window because of a lost key.  Would ringing the door bell not suffice.  I contend that crawling through a window would cause a greater disturbance.

However ... a separate residence would make crawling through a window a logical solution.

It could be that Kara did not want to reveal illegal renting accommodations on the single family zoning property.

Janet

if the kampen's have a basement, i could see someone crawling through the window..back in my younger days i crawled through my basement window while sneaking into and out of the house late at night. maybe, if they had a basement, this person lived in the basement. crawling into  a basement window would also make it much easier to break a rib, b/c i almost broke mine a few times... (not somethin i'm proud of but hey, we were all teenagers once)... again, this is alll assuming mlachester is tellin the truth so who knows


BINGO!

However ... a basement suite could be considered a separate residence and ... Kara may not have considered the tenant as a member of her household.

Years ago we rented out a basement suite in our home.  As far as we were concerned there were two separate households under one roof.

Could it be that both Marilyn and Kara were telling the truth from their own perspectives?

Janet




Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3 7/28/09 -
Post by: no rose colored glasses on August 09, 2009, 08:37:10 PM
::MonkeyRoll:: Friday night would have been entertainment night(Karaoke) I believe at local bar.  Anyone sitting outside on bench smoking would have a clear view of Maple Street just one block away.  I hope this was investigated for anyone seeing something out of the norm.  Also was there a patrolman on duty that night?  I believe there usually is someone on duty on the weekends and LB's route home would put her within 1/2 block of police station.  No one heard or seen anything is difficult to believe.  If someone has information about this guy with broken rib could have some connection with case should report it to local LE.  Let them determine if it is worthy or not.  Not to do so would be criminal.  Any information could rule someone in or out and help in the investigation.  I believe they have someone or persons of interest, but don't have enough for an arrest. IMO 
Very interesting, thanks and WELCOME  ::MonkeyCool::


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3 7/28/09 -
Post by: Sister on August 09, 2009, 08:39:12 PM
Welcome Shortcake!  :smt039 :smt039 :smt039 :smt039 :smt039 :smt039 :smt039
I am sure when DD has all the information, as usual, she will forward it to the authorities.


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3 7/28/09 -
Post by: sunshine12 on August 09, 2009, 08:40:06 PM
::MonkeyRoll:: Friday night would have been entertainment night(Karaoke) I believe at local bar.  Anyone sitting outside on bench smoking would have a clear view of Maple Street just one block away.  I hope this was investigated for anyone seeing something out of the norm.  Also was there a patrolman on duty that night?  I believe there usually is someone on duty on the weekends and LB's route home would put her within 1/2 block of police station.  No one heard or seen anything is difficult to believe.  If someone has information about this guy with broken rib could have some connection with case should report it to local LE.  Let them determine if it is worthy or not.  Not to do so would be criminal.  Any information could rule someone in or out and help in the investigation.  I believe they have someone or persons of interest, but don't have enough for an arrest. IMO 
Very interesting, thanks and WELCOME  ::MonkeyCool::

that is very interesting. i wonder if there was surveillance outside of the bar..i know some bars have them...

also, not to like get too caught up in this roger person, but i believe i read he was a heavy drinker


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3 7/28/09 -
Post by: atlanta_mom on August 09, 2009, 08:41:19 PM
WW may be an honest, trustworthy person who only wants to help.  Unfortunately in this day and age, I don't think most men would isolate a young boy and take him somewhere- fishing or what not.  I, myself, would not let my son go off with someone that isn't blood related (and even then I would think twice about it).  Alot of the SO hide behind a boy scout badge, a church or school.  But, then again, I might just be jaded.

I believe the majority of youth leaders have honorable intentions but ... nowadays parents are so skeptical and ... should be.  Parents have been entrusted with a God-given responsibility to protect their children from anticipated dangers.

Also ... organizations go out of their way to protect themselves.  Our church requires criminal backgrounds each year of all teachers/leaders who come in contact with children and young people.  Teachers/leaders are not allowed to touch/embrace children/young people except to put one arm around the shoulder.  Two representatives of the church must be represented on all church organized activities outside of the church setting.  The list goes on and one ...

Janet

Yup, very dangerous place for kids these days.  --Second thought, It is a dangerous place for everybody ::MonkeyNoNo::


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3 7/28/09 -
Post by: A_News_Junkie_Monkey on August 09, 2009, 09:04:09 PM
::MonkeyRoll:: Friday night would have been entertainment night(Karaoke) I believe at local bar.  Anyone sitting outside on bench smoking would have a clear view of Maple Street just one block away.  I hope this was investigated for anyone seeing something out of the norm.  Also was there a patrolman on duty that night?  I believe there usually is someone on duty on the weekends and LB's route home would put her within 1/2 block of police station.  No one heard or seen anything is difficult to believe.  If someone has information about this guy with broken rib could have some connection with case should report it to local LE.  Let them determine if it is worthy or not.  Not to do so would be criminal.  Any information could rule someone in or out and help in the investigation.  I believe they have someone or persons of interest, but don't have enough for an arrest. IMO 

Shortcake - Welcome, first off. 
I take it you are a local - if so, please tell us so we can ask your opinions and questions on the town.
Monkeys are good about reporting things we dig up.  I would be from DD's posts that she has already put Roger on LE radar.
Again, welcome!


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3 7/28/09 -
Post by: Tamikosmom on August 09, 2009, 09:13:47 PM
MonkeyRoll:: Friday night would have been entertainment night(Karaoke) I believe at local bar.  Anyone sitting outside on bench smoking would have a clear view of Maple Street just one block away.  I hope this was investigated for anyone seeing something out of the norm.  Also was there a patrolman on duty that night?  I believe there usually is someone on duty on the weekends and LB's route home would put her within 1/2 block of police station.  No one heard or seen anything is difficult to believe.  If someone has information about this guy with broken rib could have some connection with case should report it to local LE.  Let them determine if it is worthy or not.  Not to do so would be criminal.  Any information could rule someone in or out and help in the investigation.  I believe they have someone or persons of interest, but don't have enough for an arrest. IMO 

I sure hope so.

Shortcake ... what makes you or others think believe there is somebody under suspicion but the dots cannot yet be connected?

Also ... has it been revealed whether Josh Baum was at home with Mom when Lindsey allegedly left the Kampen/Williams residence at approximately 9:15/9:30 PM.

Thanks

WELCOME TO THE CAGE!

Janet


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3 7/28/09 -
Post by: doubledecker on August 09, 2009, 09:15:33 PM
where is the library for mccleary?


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3 7/28/09 -
Post by: doubledecker on August 09, 2009, 09:16:45 PM
You are right Mama.  Don't get me wrong, I have no knowledge of drug use by any person in town but who does let their kids run free at that time of night?  I don't care what percentage of light is left, it's nearly bedtime for lots of kids at her age.  Parents that don't want to be bothered by their children get to run around unsupervised.  What was KaraK, her BF, other roomie doing that was so important that they couldn't help her get home?  Some folks just need to be shook till they come to their senses.  Look forward to see all the brainstorming here.  You go DD!!!  Check this so called roomie out please.  You've run down everything else I have asked of you and it is so appreciated.  Your a gem just like all the other Monkey's here.  If I don't post again for a while please have great evening and a Blessed Day tomorrow!  God Bless Lindsey, Caylee, Haliegh, Tracy, Jennifer, Adji, Sandra, Robert...oh my heart is so heavy with pain and sorrow, it cries for them all and too many to list but just as important as the ones already listed.

I have enough info to find out exactly who this guy is and will find out who he knows and I will find out who is lying about this guy for sure.  I have his name, his work, his background, where he hangs out.  now to find out who he connects to, and I am sure someone will be checking up on this guy to see if he really did crawl through kara's window and got a broken rib.  to tell you the truth I do not believe he did, but as always, even if I think one way, I will look to see if I am wrong.
IF it was supposed to be a basement window he climbed thru it wasn't KaraK's house because she has no basement.And if this supposedly happened while Kara,Melissa and Scott were looking for Lindsey,wasn't Kara's kids at home?Or did she pile them all in the truck/car/van?

there was no mention of a basement window, just a window, the basement part was from tomikasmom wondering if it were a basement window. 

no mention at all of basement from ME
Thanks DD
So no basement window.Was this supposed to have happened the night Lindsey went missing?

yes, she said the night lindsey went missing


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3 7/28/09 -
Post by: doubledecker on August 09, 2009, 09:18:51 PM
::MonkeyRoll:: Friday night would have been entertainment night(Karaoke) I believe at local bar.  Anyone sitting outside on bench smoking would have a clear view of Maple Street just one block away.  I hope this was investigated for anyone seeing something out of the norm.  Also was there a patrolman on duty that night?  I believe there usually is someone on duty on the weekends and LB's route home would put her within 1/2 block of police station.  No one heard or seen anything is difficult to believe.  If someone has information about this guy with broken rib could have some connection with case should report it to local LE.  Let them determine if it is worthy or not.  Not to do so would be criminal.  Any information could rule someone in or out and help in the investigation.  I believe they have someone or persons of interest, but don't have enough for an arrest. IMO 


I hope you are not calling me a criminal


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3 7/28/09 -
Post by: doubledecker on August 09, 2009, 09:20:24 PM

there was no mention of a basement window, just a window, the basement part was from tomikasmom wondering if it were a basement window. 

no mention at all of basement from ME

DD ... it was just speculation in regards to a tenant who was locked out of his accommodations and ... was forced to "break in".

Janet

+++++++

Could it be that the Kampen/Williams residence has a rental accommodation separate from the main house.

Janet

+++++++

Quote from: sunshine12 on July 05, 2009, 06:42:50 PM

i also am curious as to who exactly was in the kampen home the night that lindsey disappeared?


KaraK
Re: Lindsey Baum, 10y missing from McCleary, WA 6/26/09
« Reply #1163 on: July 05, 2009, 06:52:39 PM »


My house - Myself, Scott and my 4 kids.

http://scaredmonkeys.net/index.php?topic=5541.msg865334;topicseen#msg865334

I am told in a previous email that he is a  "roommate" of kara.  that sounds like same house to me.

If Kara Kampen, Scott Williams and four kids were in the house why would a roommate feel the need to crawl through a window because of a lost key.  Would ringing the door bell not suffice.  I contend that crawling through a window would cause a greater disturbance.

However ... a separate residence would make crawling through a window a logical solution.

It could be that Kara did not want to reveal illegal renting accommodations on the single family zoning property.

Janet

if the kampen's have a basement, i could see someone crawling through the window..back in my younger days i crawled through my basement window while sneaking into and out of the house late at night. maybe, if they had a basement, this person lived in the basement. crawling into  a basement window would also make it much easier to break a rib, b/c i almost broke mine a few times... (not somethin i'm proud of but hey, we were all teenagers once)... again, this is alll assuming mlachester is tellin the truth so who knows


BINGO!

However ... a basement suite could be considered a separate residence and ... Kara may not have considered the tenant as a member of her household.

Years ago we rented out a basement suite in our home.  As far as we were concerned there were two separate households under one roof.

Could it be that both Marilyn and Kara were telling the truth from their own perspectives?

Janet



yes I know, this is what I said, that you were just "wondering"  ::MonkeyCool::


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3 7/28/09 -
Post by: love4ever on August 09, 2009, 09:20:24 PM
where is the library for mccleary?


Timberland Regional Library District - McCleary Timberland Library
address    121 South 4th Street
McCleary, Washington 98557

http://www.localdatabase.com/business/26590490/Timberland_Regional_Library_District_-_McCleary_Timberland_Library.html

http://www.cityofmccleary.com/index.asp?Type=B_LIST&SEC={08A77A55-420B-4CA1-B8A7-592C5AF2CFF9}


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3 7/28/09 -
Post by: doubledecker on August 09, 2009, 09:21:06 PM
::MonkeyRoll:: Friday night would have been entertainment night(Karaoke) I believe at local bar.  Anyone sitting outside on bench smoking would have a clear view of Maple Street just one block away.  I hope this was investigated for anyone seeing something out of the norm.  Also was there a patrolman on duty that night?  I believe there usually is someone on duty on the weekends and LB's route home would put her within 1/2 block of police station.  No one heard or seen anything is difficult to believe.  If someone has information about this guy with broken rib could have some connection with case should report it to local LE.  Let them determine if it is worthy or not.  Not to do so would be criminal.  Any information could rule someone in or out and help in the investigation.  I believe they have someone or persons of interest, but don't have enough for an arrest. IMO 

btw can you sit outside the bar and see tag's house?


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3 7/28/09 -
Post by: doubledecker on August 09, 2009, 09:25:49 PM
where is the library for mccleary?


Timberland Regional Library District - McCleary Timberland Library
address    121 South 4th Street
McCleary, Washington 98557

http://www.localdatabase.com/business/26590490/Timberland_Regional_Library_District_-_McCleary_Timberland_Library.html

http://www.cityofmccleary.com/index.asp?Type=B_LIST&SEC={08A77A55-420B-4CA1-B8A7-592C5AF2CFF9}

thanks, wanting to find out if people from elma come to the mccleary library?  or does elma have their own?  will go read the links


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3 7/28/09 -
Post by: love4ever on August 09, 2009, 09:30:39 PM
where is the library for mccleary?


Timberland Regional Library District - McCleary Timberland Library
address    121 South 4th Street
McCleary, Washington 98557

http://www.localdatabase.com/business/26590490/Timberland_Regional_Library_District_-_McCleary_Timberland_Library.html

http://www.cityofmccleary.com/index.asp?Type=B_LIST&SEC={08A77A55-420B-4CA1-B8A7-592C5AF2CFF9}

thanks, wanting to find out if people from elma come to the mccleary library?  or does elma have their own?  will go read the links


You're welcome


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3 7/28/09 -
Post by: love4ever on August 09, 2009, 09:44:40 PM
this is from 2005

Overview of Drug and Alcohol Trafficking and Abuse in McCleary, Washington

http://www.drugalcoholrehab.net/washington/McCleary.html


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3 7/28/09 -
Post by: mamacrazy30 on August 09, 2009, 09:46:02 PM
this is from 2005

Overview of Drug and Alcohol Trafficking and Abuse in McCleary, Washington

http://www.drugalcoholrehab.net/washington/McCleary.html

thanks love


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3 7/28/09 -
Post by: love4ever on August 09, 2009, 09:48:15 PM
this is from 2005

Overview of Drug and Alcohol Trafficking and Abuse in McCleary, Washington

http://www.drugalcoholrehab.net/washington/McCleary.html

thanks love


welcome, and if you put your mouse on the ladies blue shirt there will a pop up so you can x her out if u want..lol


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3 7/28/09 -
Post by: mamacrazy30 on August 09, 2009, 09:53:19 PM
this is from 2005

Overview of Drug and Alcohol Trafficking and Abuse in McCleary, Washington

http://www.drugalcoholrehab.net/washington/McCleary.html

thanks love



welcome, and if you put your mouse on the ladies blue shirt there will a pop up so you can x her out if u want..lol
thehehe yeah, i figured that out pretty quick ::MonkeyHaHa::
i hate those things ::MonkeyJnBox::


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3 7/28/09 -
Post by: mamacrazy30 on August 09, 2009, 09:56:52 PM
this is my off the cuff jmo paranoid opinion.  i wonder if 'rodger' has something to do with drugs?


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3 7/28/09 -
Post by: love4ever on August 09, 2009, 10:01:32 PM
The date I saw was 2005, and the site the info is posted on I can not say if the info is true. I am trying to look for reliable sites.


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3 7/28/09 -
Post by: love4ever on August 09, 2009, 10:02:54 PM
this is my off the cuff jmo paranoid opinion.  i wonder if 'rodger' has something to do with drugs?

LOL...is it being paranoid or having a one track mind? ::MonkeyHaHa::


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3 7/28/09 -
Post by: doubledecker on August 09, 2009, 10:02:59 PM
this is my off the cuff jmo paranoid opinion.  i wonder if 'rodger' has something to do with drugs?

hmmm glad you posted that... will tell you this much the guy is a cook... just clicked on that when you said that... hahah,   what kind of cook is he?  heck now you are getting me to thinking, and that can become a problem when I think LOL


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3 7/28/09 -
Post by: mamacrazy30 on August 09, 2009, 10:18:00 PM
this is my off the cuff jmo paranoid opinion.  i wonder if 'rodger' has something to do with drugs?

hmmm glad you posted that... will tell you this much the guy is a cook... just clicked on that when you said that... hahah,   what kind of cook is he?  heck now you are getting me to thinking, and that can become a problem when I think LOL
maybe he is a 'cook' and ml is 'lab tech' and a phbo??? oh what ever you call it...the 'needle' people...you know where i'm going with this


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3 7/28/09 -
Post by: mamacrazy30 on August 09, 2009, 10:20:12 PM
this is my off the cuff jmo paranoid opinion.  i wonder if 'rodger' has something to do with drugs?

LOL...is it being paranoid or having a one track mind? ::MonkeyHaHa::
probably some of both. ::MonkeyDevil2::


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3 7/28/09 -
Post by: doubledecker on August 09, 2009, 10:26:54 PM
this is my off the cuff jmo paranoid opinion.  i wonder if 'rodger' has something to do with drugs?

hmmm glad you posted that... will tell you this much the guy is a cook... just clicked on that when you said that... hahah,   what kind of cook is he?  heck now you are getting me to thinking, and that can become a problem when I think LOL
maybe he is a 'cook' and ml is 'lab tech' and a phbo??? oh what ever you call it...the 'needle' people...you know where i'm going with this
yes I know where you are at LOL   more than going there, you are there already.  that's what I mean what kind of a cook is he, oh I'm being weird now, I did to straighten up LOL

for real though he is a cook at a restuarant there in mccleary, so I am told. 



Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3 7/28/09 -
Post by: mamacrazy30 on August 09, 2009, 10:31:33 PM
well, i leave that alone for a while as well lol.  poor rodger, he could just be some random restaurant guy with a broken rib. ::MonkeyDevil2::


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3 7/28/09 -
Post by: love4ever on August 09, 2009, 10:32:02 PM
this is my off the cuff jmo paranoid opinion.  i wonder if 'rodger' has something to do with drugs?

LOL...is it being paranoid or having a one track mind? ::MonkeyHaHa::
probably some of both. ::MonkeyDevil2::

At least your honest..LOL ::MonkeyCool::


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3 7/28/09 -
Post by: love4ever on August 09, 2009, 10:34:24 PM
well, i leave that alone for a while as well lol.  poor rodger, he could just be some random restaurant guy with a broken rib. ::MonkeyDevil2::

I am beginning to think your screename here fits ya..LOL...and i am saying that in a fun but serious way...Please do not take me in the wrong way ::MonkeyDevil::


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3 7/28/09 -
Post by: love4ever on August 09, 2009, 10:36:16 PM
DD,  ::MonkeyKiss::..lol


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3 7/28/09 -
Post by: mamacrazy30 on August 09, 2009, 10:36:51 PM
well, i leave that alone for a while as well lol.  poor rodger, he could just be some random restaurant guy with a broken rib. ::MonkeyDevil2::

I am beginning to think your screename here fits ya..LOL...and i am saying that in a fun but serious way...Please do not take me in the wrong way ::MonkeyDevil::
::MonkeyWink:: ::MonkeyDevil:: ::MonkeyDevil:: ::MonkeyDevil::


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3 7/28/09 -
Post by: love4ever on August 09, 2009, 10:37:33 PM
I feel silly tonight, are we allowed?  ::MonkeyCheer2::

I need to research!!!!!!!!!!!!!


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3 7/28/09 -
Post by: mamacrazy30 on August 09, 2009, 10:40:39 PM
i read this earlier today and it almost seems fitting here sometimes
Quote
http://www.dreamindemon.com/2009/08/09/where-have-all-the-satanists-gone/


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3 7/28/09 -
Post by: mamacrazy30 on August 09, 2009, 10:42:04 PM
i read this earlier today and it almost seems fitting here sometimes
Quote
http://www.dreamindemon.com/2009/08/09/where-have-all-the-satanists-gone/
caution it has dirty words.


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3 7/28/09 -
Post by: love4ever on August 09, 2009, 10:45:29 PM
i read this earlier today and it almost seems fitting here sometimes
Quote
http://www.dreamindemon.com/2009/08/09/where-have-all-the-satanists-gone/

It does, especially when we speak of Smiley...Grrrrr




Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3 7/28/09 -
Post by: doubledecker on August 09, 2009, 10:46:52 PM
hmmm I was really wondering if you can see tag's from the bar, if you are reading can you let me know


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3 7/28/09 -
Post by: love4ever on August 09, 2009, 10:49:02 PM
However, we are not like that site...


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3 7/28/09 -
Post by: mamacrazy30 on August 09, 2009, 10:50:03 PM
However, we are not like that site...
no.  thats where the dirty word caution came in.  but it is a crime site as well...just different.


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3 7/28/09 -
Post by: love4ever on August 09, 2009, 10:52:42 PM
However, we are not like that site...
no.  thats where the dirty word caution came in.  but it is a crime site as well...just different.

akire
10:08 am on July 29th, 2009

How is it possible that people get locked up longer on drug charges than child molesters and rapists do!? These laws need serious change.

http://www.dreamindemon.com/2009/07/28/jeffrey-smiley-likes-to-take-pictures/


I would like to know the same thing..


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3 7/28/09 -
Post by: Scandi on August 09, 2009, 10:53:54 PM
Howdy Melisb,  I read a few pages back where you said WW is an equal opportunity SO.  Did you mean he is a SO or that he just has a huge and varied sexual appetite?  Ta

Also on the RUMOR about the guy who drinks and crawled into Lindsey's window, breaking his rib, can anyone point me to where this first came to light?  On the night she disappeared she wasn't home but for a little bit to take a shower and change clothes from swimming.  Also she wasn't alone as MK was with her, right?  The night before that MK had spent the night with Lindsey so don't know if that would work either.  I sure hope LE spent some quality investigative time with MK ;}


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3 7/28/09 -
Post by: doubledecker on August 09, 2009, 10:59:50 PM
Howdy Melisb,  I read a few pages back where you said WW is an equal opportunity SO.  Did you mean he is a SO or that he just has a huge and varied sexual appetite?  Ta

Also on the RUMOR about the guy who drinks and crawled into Lindsey's window, breaking his rib, can anyone point me to where this first came to light?  On the night she disappeared she wasn't home but for a little bit to take a shower and change clothes from swimming.  Also she wasn't alone as MK was with her, right?  The night before that MK had spent the night with Lindsey so don't know if that would work either.  I sure hope LE spent some quality investigative time with MK ;}


this orginated from marilyn lachester.  After being told about it I had someone ask her about it again.  this time was given his full name, where he worked, that he is suppose to be kara's roommate, that he crawled in the window the night lindsey went missing and broke his rib, that he is always at the bar.  all of this is marilyn's answers to my questions about him, as marilyn had said before kara had a roommate named roger, but kara said she doesn't even know anyone by the name of roger, so I had someone go back and ask marilyn again. 


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3 7/28/09 -
Post by: mamacrazy30 on August 09, 2009, 11:09:41 PM
completely off the wall but dosen't kk hubs drive a semi? 


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3 7/28/09 -
Post by: mamacrazy30 on August 09, 2009, 11:11:03 PM
completely off the wall but dosen't kk hubs drive a semi? 
i remember her saying he is the only one in the house that drives, but for some reason i thought he drove for a living.


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3 7/28/09 -
Post by: Sister on August 09, 2009, 11:19:56 PM
dd, o/t have a question on the Cantu thread of Blink's.
Thanks, night all.


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3 7/28/09 -
Post by: doubledecker on August 09, 2009, 11:21:22 PM
dd, o/t have a question on the Cantu thread of Blink's.
Thanks, night all.
''

okkay going to see


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3 7/28/09 -
Post by: doubledecker on August 09, 2009, 11:27:03 PM
dd, o/t have a question on the Cantu thread of Blink's.
Thanks, night all.

hmmm can't figure out where you mean


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3 7/28/09 -
Post by: Tamikosmom on August 09, 2009, 11:42:33 PM
Howdy Melisb,  I read a few pages back where you said WW is an equal opportunity SO.  Did you mean he is a SO or that he just has a huge and varied sexual appetite?  Ta

Also on the RUMOR about the guy who drinks and crawled into Lindsey's window, breaking his rib, can anyone point me to where this first came to light?  On the night she disappeared she wasn't home but for a little bit to take a shower and change clothes from swimming.  Also she wasn't alone as MK was with her, right?  The night before that MK had spent the night with Lindsey so don't know if that would work either.  I sure hope LE spent some quality investigative time with MK ;}


this orginated from marilyn lachester.  After being told about it I had someone ask her about it again.  this time was given his full name, where he worked, that he is suppose to be kara's roommate, that he crawled in the window the night lindsey went missing and broke his rib, that he is always at the bar.  all of this is marilyn's answers to my questions about him, as marilyn had said before kara had a roommate named roger, but kara said she doesn't even know anyone by the name of roger, so I had someone go back and ask marilyn again. 

... I tend to believe mlachester.  She goes into too much detail to be lying.  Also ... her words regarding CPS, 911 and McCleary LE reflect her words in her comments to KOMO.  mlachester does not attempt to hide her identity when making these allegations.

Maybe Kara's denial of a tenant has everything to do with breaking the single family bylaws/zoning in her area or ... maybe something to do with the IRA.

Janet


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3 7/28/09 -
Post by: Tamikosmom on August 09, 2009, 11:55:56 PM
Good Night Monkeys!  Good Night Zookeepers!

Janet
8:55 PM PT


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3 7/28/09 -
Post by: love4ever on August 10, 2009, 12:03:05 AM
Howdy Melisb,  I read a few pages back where you said WW is an equal opportunity SO.  Did you mean he is a SO or that he just has a huge and varied sexual appetite?  Ta

Also on the RUMOR about the guy who drinks and crawled into Lindsey's window, breaking his rib, can anyone point me to where this first came to light?  On the night she disappeared she wasn't home but for a little bit to take a shower and change clothes from swimming.  Also she wasn't alone as MK was with her, right?  The night before that MK had spent the night with Lindsey so don't know if that would work either.  I sure hope LE spent some quality investigative time with MK ;}


this orginated from marilyn lachester.  After being told about it I had someone ask her about it again.  this time was given his full name, where he worked, that he is suppose to be kara's roommate, that he crawled in the window the night lindsey went missing and broke his rib, that he is always at the bar.  all of this is marilyn's answers to my questions about him, as marilyn had said before kara had a roommate named roger, but kara said she doesn't even know anyone by the name of roger, so I had someone go back and ask marilyn again. 

... I tend to believe mlachester.  She goes into too much detail to be lying.  Also ... her words regarding CPS, 911 and McCleary LE reflect her words in her comments to KOMO.  mlachester does not attempt to hide her identity when making these allegations.

Maybe Kara's denial of a tenant has everything to do with breaking the single family bylaws/zoning in her area or ... maybe something to do with the IRA.

Janet

I find it hard to believe her...

Just for the record, I find discrepencies in Mlachester claims of innocence...

 Sunday, July 05, 2009
   
Lindsey
Ok so lets clear up the BS. I have been reading some crap online that people have to say. For one under a pic of me and my husband it say he has stood by me threw it all! Someone wanted to know if it was bad stuff. Well When married as long as we have been there are all kinds of bumps in the road. But what i an talking about was when I was injured and could not work. I became upset with myself and felt usless. But he pulled me threw that as I recovred. He supported me while I went back to school and learned a new skill. Now lets talk about my court record! I had to go to court because my dogs were barking and one day one got out. Oh My goodness I had to pay a 50 dollar fine because my dog got out and was running. If anyone wants too know something. Here I am ask. I am the most upfront person there is. Send me an e-mail on here. I don't get on here everyday but I do enough I will get back to you in a day or so. As far as the abuse Lindsey went threw the MPD knows the FBI also knows. They have the reports I help Lindsey file. But people lets face it she never went anywhere without he Cell. Did she have it at her friends house she left the night she dissapered? Because its at her home now "well maybe in evidence". Let all get back to the real picture here. Let keep praying nothing did happen to her at home and pray she will make back safe and alive. Just as of this moring when the FBI was at my house I made a comment about the 911 calls and the call to CPS. They replied with I am sure we have all those records.  So they know what is going on. And for all you on scared monkeys pulling up my step son law record and names of people you think may be my realitives that should have nothing to do with finding lindsey. And yes I have a son around her age who is her friend. But he is none of your concern that also will not help find lindsey. And yes he talked to the FBI also. People need to leave him alone he's a child. http://www.missingkids.com/missingkids/servlet/PubCaseSearchServlet?act=viewChildDetail&LanguageCountry=en_US&searchLang=en_US&caseLang=en_US&orgPrefix=NCMC&caseNum=1125977&seqNum=1

http://blogs.myspace.com/index.cfm?fuseaction=blog.view&friendId=47138410&blogId=498637401

Versus...

BURNS, MARILYN AUDREY MARIE

Female, Age: 31
ID:10721
Book-No

Statute:
9A.36.041 - Assault 4
165354

Offense:
DOMV - Domestic Violence

Arrest Type:
CIT
Booked

Charging Agency:
MCPD-McCleary Police Department
6/28/2008 04:15

Court:
MCMU-McCleary Municipal
Released

Bail Amount:
No Bail
6/30/2008 18:00
Disposition:
PRD-Released on Personal Recog

http://www.co.grays-harbor.wa.us/info/sheriff/JailRegisters/InmateDetail.asp?SrchNameNo=10721

In refrence to the charge above...


RCW 9A.36.041
Assault in the fourth degree.


(1) A person is guilty of assault in the fourth degree if, under circumstances not amounting to assault in the first, second, or third degree, or custodial assault, he or she assaults another.

(2) Assault in the fourth degree is a gross misdemeanor.

[1987 c 188 § 2; 1986 c 257 § 7.]



This bothers me! If she is the one writing in her blog and declaring her only court appearance was that in regards to her dog, then this is a lie! Even if she finds embarrasment for such a record, it does not qualify as stating the truth of her innocence when such a case (Lindseys), it just makes it worse as being a person of interest!!



Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3 7/28/09 -
Post by: love4ever on August 10, 2009, 12:10:00 AM
Maybe she tells the truth and lies


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3 7/28/09 -
Post by: Tracygirl on August 10, 2009, 12:36:58 AM
You can have a roommate, it is not illegal to have a roommate. Zoning laws refer to landlords spliting a house such as a multiple family or a duplex or building an apartment without permission. Shared rent is not income so you don't have to declare it.


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3 7/28/09 -
Post by: shortcake on August 10, 2009, 04:20:34 AM
hmmm I was really wondering if you can see tag's from the bar, if you are reading can you let me know
What do you mean by tag's? I am not familiar with this.  I do know you look directly up 4th street from the front of the bar which is located on W. Simpson Ave.  Maple Street runs parallel to W Simpson Ave.  Mike's across the street from Gordon's recently closed.  I am familiar with the area and have spent a few weeks trying to catch up with past posts.  Sounds like Marilyn has some information, but I don't know if all of it is good.   ::MonkeyConfused::  I do know of a Roger that had a broken rib.  Could it be the same one?  Sounds like it.  I have no information about him so enough said.  Shortcake   


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3 7/28/09 -
Post by: JessStar on August 10, 2009, 08:09:44 AM
Howdy Melisb,  I read a few pages back where you said WW is an equal opportunity SO.  Did you mean he is a SO or that he just has a huge and varied sexual appetite?  Ta

Also on the RUMOR about the guy who drinks and crawled into Lindsey's window, breaking his rib, can anyone point me to where this first came to light?  On the night she disappeared she wasn't home but for a little bit to take a shower and change clothes from swimming.  Also she wasn't alone as MK was with her, right?  The night before that MK had spent the night with Lindsey so don't know if that would work either.  I sure hope LE spent some quality investigative time with MK ;}


this orginated from marilyn lachester.  After being told about it I had someone ask her about it again.  this time was given his full name, where he worked, that he is suppose to be kara's roommate, that he crawled in the window the night lindsey went missing and broke his rib, that he is always at the bar.  all of this is marilyn's answers to my questions about him, as marilyn had said before kara had a roommate named roger, but kara said she doesn't even know anyone by the name of roger, so I had someone go back and ask marilyn again. 

Scandi-- quick correction here--the information suggests the guy crawled into a window of KK's home  (not Lindsey's window) because he was KK's "roomate" and had forgotten or misplaced his keys. 


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3 7/28/09 -
Post by: melisb on August 10, 2009, 08:31:14 AM
Mornin' Monkeys!!!  To those asking me to clarify what I said earlier I am going to try.  Everything was IMO and purely hypothetical.  Someone said WW took JB fishing and someone mentioned Tweakers Pond or Lake and I came up with what if WW is an equal opportunity SO (both sexes).  What if he was a closet tweaker and some of us know what Meth does to a sexual appetite, he would try anything in his path.  You could insert anyones name here to my what ifs.  What if LB was scared on her way home and WW picked her up?  What if the roomie of KK followed LB and picked her up?  Scandi, I guess my answer would be both if true.  Please, no nanners, I was just throwing things out there and I am sure no of it will stick! lol It's early and I think I forgot to answer another Monkey's question.  I do apologize. 


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3 7/28/09 -
Post by: no rose colored glasses on August 10, 2009, 09:47:29 AM
hmmm I was really wondering if you can see tag's from the bar, if you are reading can you let me know
What do you mean by tag's? I am not familiar with this.  I do know you look directly up 4th street from the front of the bar which is located on W. Simpson Ave.  Maple Street runs parallel to W Simpson Ave.  Mike's across the street from Gordon's recently closed.  I am familiar with the area and have spent a few weeks trying to catch up with past posts.  Sounds like Marilyn has some information, but I don't know if all of it is good.   ::MonkeyConfused::  I do know of a Roger that had a broken rib.  Could it be the same one?  Sounds like it.  I have no information about him so enough said.  Shortcake   
Interesting, I was wondering what this tag's means also.  ::MonkeyConfused::


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3 7/28/09 -
Post by: Sister on August 10, 2009, 09:50:53 AM
Janet, your words: "She goes into too much detail to be lying."  You're joking with us, right?  Casey Anthony . . . does that ring a bell?  I'm happy that in your world, folks who go into detail are telling the truth.  KK has not tried to not identify herself either.  You want to believe ML that's fine, but there are some of us that don't.  As for me, bumping and snipping all sorts of articles from over a month ago won't change my mind (because you do realize, I'm sure that some of those articles cannot be opened now as they are archived by the newspapers).  As far KK getting in trouble with zoning or IRA (I guess you meant IRS), think about it, you know this factually because . . . you know the zoning laws in McCleary and the provisions in the IRS code?  Yeah, I know, it's your opinion and you are entitled to it in the "process of elimination" etc etc.
I disagree with you and that is my right, just as it is your right to have your opinion.


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3 7/28/09 -
Post by: Lovinlife on August 10, 2009, 10:05:12 AM
Not to speak for anyone here but "tags" to me meant License Plates?  ICBW, Lovinlife


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3 7/28/09 -
Post by: no rose colored glasses on August 10, 2009, 10:10:09 AM
Not to speak for anyone here but "tags" to me meant License Plates?  ICBW, Lovinlife
Thanks, I really feel dumb now  ::MonkeyConfused::


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3 7/28/09 -
Post by: Lovinlife on August 10, 2009, 10:14:13 AM
Not to speak for anyone here but "tags" to me meant License Plates?  ICBW, Lovinlife
Thanks, I really feel dumb now  ::MonkeyConfused::
Don't feel dumb NRCG, I don't even know if that's what doubledecker was saying!?!? ::MonkeyWink::


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3 7/28/09 -
Post by: no rose colored glasses on August 10, 2009, 10:17:56 AM
Not to speak for anyone here but "tags" to me meant License Plates?  ICBW, Lovinlife
Thanks, I really feel dumb now  ::MonkeyConfused::
Don't feel dumb NRCG, I don't even know if that's what doubledecker was saying!?!? ::MonkeyWink::
I was thinking it was somekind of bar, or a person's last name, but that sure makes sense what you said.


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3 7/28/09 -
Post by: Leroy on August 10, 2009, 10:22:42 AM
::MonkeyRoll:: Friday night would have been entertainment night(Karaoke) I believe at local bar.  Anyone sitting outside on bench smoking would have a clear view of Maple Street just one block away.  I hope this was investigated for anyone seeing something out of the norm.  Also was there a patrolman on duty that night?  I believe there usually is someone on duty on the weekends and LB's route home would put her within 1/2 block of police station.  No one heard or seen anything is difficult to believe.  If someone has information about this guy with broken rib could have some connection with case should report it to local LE.  Let them determine if it is worthy or not.  Not to do so would be criminal.  Any information could rule someone in or out and help in the investigation.  I believe they have someone or persons of interest, but don't have enough for an arrest. IMO 

btw can you sit outside the bar and see tag's house?

BUMP

**I think DD was referring to a person when she says "tags".


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3 7/28/09 -
Post by: Lovinlife on August 10, 2009, 10:33:13 AM
Good Point Leroy.  Sorry to just throw that out there without seeing original post.  TY & disregard my input.


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3 7/28/09 -
Post by: Leroy on August 10, 2009, 10:35:54 AM
Good Point Leroy.  Sorry to just throw that out there without seeing original post.  TY & disregard my input.

Hiya Lovin!  No problem - I was confused too so I went back to see what she was talking about.  But "tags" for a car would have made sense...that's what I think of when I hear that.

I'm not sure who "tag" is though  ::MonkeyConfused:: 


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3 7/28/09 -
Post by: no rose colored glasses on August 10, 2009, 10:35:56 AM
Good Point Leroy.  Sorry to just throw that out there without seeing original post.  TY & disregard my input.
  ::MonkeyConfused::  Now the question is who is this tags person.


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3 7/28/09 -
Post by: Sister on August 10, 2009, 10:48:23 AM
Lovin, I enjoy reading your posts.  I missed the word "house" myself.  Thanks Leroy!
 :2thinky:


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3 7/28/09 -
Post by: doubledecker on August 10, 2009, 10:49:36 AM
hmmm I was really wondering if you can see tag's from the bar, if you are reading can you let me know
What do you mean by tag's? I am not familiar with this.  I do know you look directly up 4th street from the front of the bar which is located on W. Simpson Ave.  Maple Street runs parallel to W Simpson Ave.  Mike's across the street from Gordon's recently closed.  I am familiar with the area and have spent a few weeks trying to catch up with past posts.  Sounds like Marilyn has some information, but I don't know if all of it is good.   ::MonkeyConfused::  I do know of a Roger that had a broken rib.  Could it be the same one?  Sounds like it.  I have no information about him so enough said.  Shortcake   

Tag is a person.  Guess you don't know who they are.  Sorry.  Figured if you were from there you would know them.  And you mentioned the bar and people sitting out there and he goes there. 

anyway, oh we know who roger is.  Interesting that you know who he is also and that he has a broken rib.  You must know marilyn quite well. ::MonkeyWink::


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3 7/28/09 -
Post by: Tamikosmom on August 10, 2009, 10:56:57 AM
hmmm I was really wondering if you can see tag's from the bar, if you are reading can you let me know
What do you mean by tag's? I am not familiar with this.  I do know you look directly up 4th street from the front of the bar which is located on W. Simpson Ave.  Maple Street runs parallel to W Simpson Ave.  Mike's across the street from Gordon's recently closed.  I am familiar with the area and have spent a few weeks trying to catch up with past posts.  Sounds like Marilyn has some information, but I don't know if all of it is good.   ::MonkeyConfused::  I do know of a Roger that had a broken rib.  Could it be the same one?  Sounds like it.  I have no information about him so enough said.  Shortcake   

Thank you for that confirmation shortcake.

Janet


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3 7/28/09 -
Post by: doubledecker on August 10, 2009, 10:57:33 AM
To All...

if you just give us the rest of the day to get this together, we will tell you who roger is.  We want it all laid out and very clear so there is no way to misinterpret any of this. 

and there surely has NOT been enough said about "roger". 


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3 7/28/09 -
Post by: no rose colored glasses on August 10, 2009, 10:58:15 AM
 And thanks for confirming that tags is a person  ::MonkeyCool::


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3 7/28/09 -
Post by: no rose colored glasses on August 10, 2009, 10:58:56 AM
To All...

if you just give us the rest of the day to get this together, we will tell you who roger is.  We want it all laid out and very clear so there is no way to misinterpret any of this. 

and there surely has NOT been enough said about "roger". 
  ::MonkeyCool:: Thanks waiting patiently


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3 7/28/09 -
Post by: doubledecker on August 10, 2009, 11:03:10 AM
hmmm I was really wondering if you can see tag's from the bar, if you are reading can you let me know
What do you mean by tag's? I am not familiar with this.  I do know you look directly up 4th street from the front of the bar which is located on W. Simpson Ave.  Maple Street runs parallel to W Simpson Ave.  Mike's across the street from Gordon's recently closed.  I am familiar with the area and have spent a few weeks trying to catch up with past posts.  Sounds like Marilyn has some information, but I don't know if all of it is good.   ::MonkeyConfused::  I do know of a Roger that had a broken rib.  Could it be the same one?  Sounds like it.  I have no information about him so enough said.  Shortcake   

Thank you for that confirmation shortcake.

Janet

yes thank you very much shortcake for that info.  I am so glad you are "confirming" there is a "roger" with a broken rib. 

I was talking about tag and libby...ring a bell... good friends of marilyn's? 
where lindsey was that day?   

I use to have some favorite games when I was little. 

mother may I
simple simon
red light green light

I'm older now, and though I don't really involve myself in playing games much now a days, but when invited to play, best believe, I know the rules and I am very good at winning. 


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3 7/28/09 -
Post by: sunshine12 on August 10, 2009, 11:10:57 AM
do tag and libby live at the home where the pool is that lindsey was swimming in on the day she disappeared?

shortcake-i was wonderin how you would know roger with the broken rib but not know tags?

could you tell us how roger broke his rib? or at least how he claims he broke it?


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3 7/28/09 -
Post by: Tamikosmom on August 10, 2009, 11:31:47 AM
Janet, your words: "She goes into too much detail to be lying."  You're joking with us, right?  Casey Anthony . . . does that ring a bell?  I'm happy that in your world, folks who go into detail are telling the truth.  KK has not tried to not identify herself either.  You want to believe ML that's fine, but there are some of us that don't.  As for me, bumping and snipping all sorts of articles from over a month ago won't change my mind (because you do realize, I'm sure that some of those articles cannot be opened now as they are archived by the newspapers).  As far KK getting in trouble with zoning or IRA (I guess you meant IRS), think about it, you know this factually because . . . you know the zoning laws in McCleary and the provisions in the IRS code?  Yeah, I know, it's your opinion and you are entitled to it in the "process of elimination" etc etc.
I disagree with you and that is my right, just as it is your right to have your opinion.


Sister ... you are so condescending to me in your responses.  Respectfully agreeing to disagree or just scrolling passed my posts will suffice.

Again ... until the truth is revealed ...  I am speculating ... with what backup that is out there ... in my posts when I attempt to give both mlachester and KaraK the benefit of the doubt that their respective motives are honorable in their attempts to inform.

In my opinion ... unliked Casey Anthony ... mlachester has no self-serving motive to embellish lies  ... to obstruct the investigation.  A little girl known to her is missing and ... an attempt to shed some light on what possiblly could have happened and ... who may have been involved ... is where it is at.

In my opinion ... unliked Casey Anthony ... KaraK has no known motive to lie ... to obstruct the investigation.  A confirmed sighting of Lindsey at shorly after 9:30 PM on Maple and 5th ... two blocks from her home ... affirms the 9:15/9:30 PM timeframe provided to authorities by Kara Kampen and Scott Williams that Lindsey left their residence.  Scott Williams has passed a polygraph.

Janet

+++++++


Could it be the McCleary Law Enforcement is focusing attention away from Melissa and Josh as suspects in an attempt to shield the "powers that be" who disregarded Marilyn's attempt to get protection for Lindsey from both her Mother and brother?

No throwing bananas please.  Neighbour who makes delicious loaves with my brused and over-riped bananas has taken off this morning with hubby for a week's vacation.

 ::MonkeyHaHa::

Janet

++++++++

ACCORDING TO MLACHESTER:

Rob
Re: Lindsey Baum #3 7/28/09 -
« Reply #896 on: August 08, 2009, 04:29:38 PM »


Quote
As far as the abuse Lindsey went threw the MPD knows the FBI also knows.

Quote
They have the reports I help Lindsey file

Quote
Just as of this moring when the FBI was at my house I made a comment about the 911 calls and the call to CPS.

http://scaredmonkeys.net/index.php?action=post;quote=904672;topic=5790.880;num_replies=1162;sesc=28414912316d49a494791fe51542bb71


doubledecker
Re: Lindsey Baum #3 7/28/09 -
« Reply #976 on: Today at 12:34:07 AM »


this is to me from a friend of marilyns

... one time she called CPS on melissa baum when lindsey came over with welts from her calfs to her back.  she was horrified and i think a couple others saw this at her house.  the other incidents with Josh were chasing her with knife, shovel, choking, and at least one other attack against another individual (and here i forgot to write it down, i think it was a female but can't recall if it was an adult or child, but marilyn made the call).  she says he was very violent and went to Juvi many times!  hmm.  anyway, i don't think she's lying, that's a whole lot to be lying about, haha

http://scaredmonkeys.net/index.php?topic=5790.msg904974#msg904974


mlachester:
To answer the questions everyone has asked, Yes I have talked to police and as far as things being unfounded its more of lazy work by cps and I don't know what the police were thinking. Since Lindsey has gone missing I have helped serch and put fliers up. I was called by the agents investigating and told them what I know. And this is no nick name everyone in McCleary knows who I am. Its no big secret she had came to my house to call 911 when her brother had done things to her. I hope lindsey is hiding and she finds a way to get to someone for help to tell them why. But as everyday gose by the fear gets worse.

http://www.king5.com/topstories/stories/NW_063009WAB-Mccleary-girl-search-LJ.1fc0b759.html?ocp=2#slcgm_comments_anchor


mlachester:
I am close to her and I know a lot more than the media or law enforcement are saying right now. As for Scanner, sorry if you don't like the truth but I have never been one to keep the truth in and she should of been taken the first time she called 911 from my house asking for help instead of put in a police car and taken back to her abuser!"

http://www.king5.com/topstories/stor...omments_anchor



Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3 7/28/09 -
Post by: Leroy on August 10, 2009, 11:33:49 AM
To All...

if you just give us the rest of the day to get this together, we will tell you who roger is.  We want it all laid out and very clear so there is no way to misinterpret any of this. 

and there surely has NOT been enough said about "roger". 
  ::MonkeyCool:: Thanks waiting patiently

Scooch over, me too  ::MonkeyCool::


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3 7/28/09 -
Post by: sunshine12 on August 10, 2009, 11:52:18 AM
tamiko's mom-i enjoy reading your posts. and appreciate that you back up what you have to say with previous posts or quotes from le.  this is something that i need to get better at doing!  ::MonkeyHaHa::

i too am stuck wondering what mlachester's reason for lying and asserting herself into the investigation would be.  if she is just playing games i am utterly disgusted

i guess im just anxiously awaiting info on this roger person. 


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3 7/28/09 -
Post by: Tamikosmom on August 10, 2009, 11:53:05 AM
Janet, your words: "She goes into too much detail to be lying."  You're joking with us, right?  Casey Anthony . . . does that ring a bell?  I'm happy that in your world, folks who go into detail are telling the truth.  KK has not tried to not identify herself either.  You want to believe ML that's fine, but there are some of us that don't.  As for me, bumping and snipping all sorts of articles from over a month ago won't change my mind (because you do realize, I'm sure that some of those articles cannot be opened now as they are archived by the newspapers).  As far KK getting in trouble with zoning or IRA (I guess you meant IRS), think about it, you know this factually because . . . you know the zoning laws in McCleary and the provisions in the IRS code?  Yeah, I know, it's your opinion and you are entitled to it in the "process of elimination" etc etc.
I disagree with you and that is my right, just as it is your right to have your opinion.


I am aware in my single family zoning neighbourhood that rental of suites ... boarders are illegal unless special consideration is approved by the township.  However ...n other neighbourhoods within the township ... registered rental suites ... boarders ... are legal but ... all monies exchanged must be declared on income tax forums.

Considering that "Roger" was not in the Kampen/Williams residence when Lindsey was there ... maybe KaraK felt that it was not necessary to reveal to DD ... to the forum ... that there was a renter/boarder living under her roof.  I am not justifying ... just saying.

IMO

Janet


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3 7/28/09 -
Post by: doubledecker on August 10, 2009, 11:55:55 AM
In the process of elimination:

let see, melissa, josh, kara, scott, etc.

how about in the process of elimination we add ML to that list
after all lindsey always ran there ML says.
ML was not living in mccleary for some time, yet she states lindsey told her this or that, well how did lindsey tell her this and that if she is not in the same town?
ML comes out of nowhere to point at melissa and josh, says she has a report to prove it.
When I ask for evidence of that report, then the story changes to she does not know if a report was made or not.
Lindsey was at Tag & Libbys that day(more to this whole story coming) and these are Marilyn's good friends. 
First I am told a local said lindsey stopped at tag and libby's on the way home and asked to spend the night.  then marilyn says NO, not at tag and libby's at Kara's. 
Then marilyn says that lindsey does not know anyone else on that street and lindsey headed straight home, well marilyn knows full well Lindsey knows Tag and Libby. But for some reason she doesn't want anyone to know that?  why?
And how does marilyn know Lindsey did or did not stop anywhere else, or who lindsey might know for that matter when she has not even lived in the town for some time.  Is she monitoring where lindsey goes and who she knows? 

how is it that someone who knows marilyn so well keeps seeing kara's daughter at the library when they don't live in that town.  According to Kara lindsey was with kara's daughter nearly everyday, so was lindsey at the library a lot also?  did the person who is marilyn's friend see lindsey at the library all those time she also saw kara's daughter there?  why are you at a library in another town, especially, when you are saying you never go anywhere? 

Why does everything a local says about what they saw or know, change after Marilyn finds out what they said? 

and "roger", oh yes, "Roger"  is that roger rabbit pulled out of the magician's hat.. wow, someone who can make people appear out of nowhere, hmmm, can they make someone disappear out of nowhere also?  magician which they are? 

come now, let's stop talking falsely now, the hour is getting late. 
from my good old friend JIMI   hendrix that is.


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3 7/28/09 -
Post by: Tamikosmom on August 10, 2009, 11:57:06 AM
tamiko's mom-i enjoy reading your posts. and appreciate that you back up what you have to say with previous posts or quotes from le.  this is something that i need to get better at doing!  ::MonkeyHaHa::

i too am stuck wondering what mlachester's reason for lying and asserting herself into the investigation would be.  if she is just playing games i am utterly disgusted

i guess im just anxiously awaiting info on this roger person. 

 ::MonkeyAngel::


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3 7/28/09 -
Post by: no rose colored glasses on August 10, 2009, 12:04:10 PM
tamiko's mom-i enjoy reading your posts. and appreciate that you back up what you have to say with previous posts or quotes from le.  this is something that i need to get better at doing!  ::MonkeyHaHa::

i too am stuck wondering what mlachester's reason for lying and asserting herself into the investigation would be.  if she is just playing games i am utterly disgusted

i guess im just anxiously awaiting info on this roger person. 
There must be a nagging reason why you believe what you do. I have nagging feelings about different aspects also and it is hard to shake, because if you are like me, I always go back, gut feelings, if you will.  ::MonkeyCool::


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3 7/28/09 -
Post by: no rose colored glasses on August 10, 2009, 12:06:42 PM
Thanks DD, is Tag and Libby the house where Lindsey swam that day?


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3 7/28/09 -
Post by: doubledecker on August 10, 2009, 12:12:34 PM
Janet, your words: "She goes into too much detail to be lying."  You're joking with us, right?  Casey Anthony . . . does that ring a bell?  I'm happy that in your world, folks who go into detail are telling the truth.  KK has not tried to not identify herself either.  You want to believe ML that's fine, but there are some of us that don't.  As for me, bumping and snipping all sorts of articles from over a month ago won't change my mind (because you do realize, I'm sure that some of those articles cannot be opened now as they are archived by the newspapers).  As far KK getting in trouble with zoning or IRA (I guess you meant IRS), think about it, you know this factually because . . . you know the zoning laws in McCleary and the provisions in the IRS code?  Yeah, I know, it's your opinion and you are entitled to it in the "process of elimination" etc etc.
I disagree with you and that is my right, just as it is your right to have your opinion.


I am aware in my single family zoning neighbourhood that rental of suites ... boarders are illegal unless special consideration is approved by the township.  However ...n other neighbourhoods within the township ... registered rental suites ... boarders ... are legal but ... all monies exchanged must be declared on income tax forums.

Considering that "Roger" was not in the Kampen/Williams residence when Lindsey was there ... maybe KaraK felt that it was not necessary to reveal to DD ... to the forum ... that there was a renter/boarder living under her roof.  I am not justifying ... just saying.

IMO

Janet

I need to try to clear up why a couple of us here get so impatient over all of this.  and tomikasmom, it is not you personally at all, and it is very wonderful that you cite everything you base you theory or specualtion on, and believe me, if you had a different speculation or even if it was not based upon Marilyn's statements, we certainly would be applauding you every step of the way and we would most likely be agreeing with you it is very possible.  However, there are a couple of us who know who is lying.  We can prove it.  We WILL prove it.  So when we see people getting duped by these lies we try to offer some form of debate why; but being there is so much we cannot say, it is all going right over everyone's head.  Then in your speculation you take what marilyn says to politely debate the issue, because you believe marilyn. 

the thing is a few of us here have been digging behind the scenes and we have dug up a tremendous amount of info even going states away to get this info.  We KNOW she is lying.  We WILL prove she is lying and just what a bonkers woman she is, devious also.  In the meantime we read how much you believe her and base your decisions upon her lies, that we just blow a fuse... NOT at YOU, but at the lies you are quoting.  so sometimes I try not to say anything, and at other times I just like am OMG I can't believe this... yet we can't say much, and what little we do say, it obviously not convincing poeople this woman is a huge liar and making all this stuff up.  And now we have someone coming to the board "confirming" marilyn's lies, and YOU are using this poster as "confirmation" that marilyn is telling the truth...

this is all going to come out in the wash, VERY SOON.. TODAY OR TOMORROW at the latest.  We just want to be certain we organize all the info in a manner which is easy to understand so NO ONE will be confused or misinterpret the info, so people will see what a liar marilyn is and that there has to be some reason she is doing this. 

so in the meantime, tomikasmom, we few who know these things, do get a little out of whack and get a "TONE" to our posts, because we are over here furious at this whole situation, because we most certainly do believe it is hindering finding Lindsey, it is affecting the whole search for her, the concern which should be there and the towns people are instead blaming melissa and josh and kara, whispering, pointing fingers, being rude, yanking the search center out from under them, snubbing them, oh you name it, it has been done to melissa and kara. No one in that town will help search because of the lies going around and they originate from Marilyn lachester. 

It is bad enough the whole town believes this lying, manipulative woman, but then we come to the board and see her lies are spread all over the net and here and people are believing her, and in the process people here are also blaming melissa, josh and kara for lindsey's disappearance.

so please forgive us if a few of us sometimes answer in a "tone" that is inappropriate.  Believe me, in any other instance we would not be getting aggrivated like we are over this, and we all believe everyone should have their own opinion and right to speculate anything and everything about any case.  We are not ones to promote censoring of any idea etc... But in this particular case, when speculation and theories are based upon the KNOWN(we know it) lies of some conniving devious woman, we crinch, and it is showing in our responses to your posts...

each of us do not mean to do this, really we don't.  we are trying to keep our mouths shut while at the same time biting at the bit to get the truth out here. 

so please bare with us, and forgive our seemingly inappropriate attitudes to your speculative posts.


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3 7/28/09 -
Post by: doubledecker on August 10, 2009, 12:20:09 PM
Thanks DD, is Tag and Libby the house where Lindsey swam that day?

I'm trying to ignore that question.   ::MonkeyWink::


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3 7/28/09 -
Post by: Sister on August 10, 2009, 12:32:33 PM
dd, I apologize, this has taken up valuable time and I need to get back to researching and keep my lips glued.


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3 7/28/09 -
Post by: Tamikosmom on August 10, 2009, 12:33:58 PM
DD

My speculations are just that ... speculations.  UNTIL ... the truth is revealed this wannabe detective will stand by her speculations and backup.

DD ... considering your words that it is rumored that Wayne Watnee has a "solid alibi" for the time that Lindsey Baum went missing ... until revealed otherwise .... I will no longer consider him a person of interest ... for now.

Considering mlachester's support base in McCleary ... considering her relationship with Lindsey ... considering the involvment of CPS, 911 and the small McCleary police force in alleged incidences ...  until revealed otherwise ... I will not regard her a person of interest.

DD ... I look forward to your revelation encompassing mlachester and Roger but ... until then ....

 ::MonkeyDevil2::

Janet

 


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3 7/28/09 -
Post by: no rose colored glasses on August 10, 2009, 12:34:20 PM
Thanks DD, is Tag and Libby the house where Lindsey swam that day?

I'm trying to ignore that question.   ::MonkeyWink::
Okay, and thanks for the long post you made, I do believe I made a comment yesterday that I saw craziness in Marilyn's eyes, I guess that I wasn't far off  ::MonkeyEek::


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3 7/28/09 -
Post by: doubledecker on August 10, 2009, 12:53:04 PM
I for one, and maybe only one of a few, am sticking up for melissa baum and kara.  In the beginning I looked at kara to the point of probably knowing what color her undies are LOL  I mean I dug and dug and basically accused her of anything and everything.  What I did through email and asked her is horrendous, but I had my thoughts on her because lindsey left that house and there was no dog scent and she got nowhere etc.  I really thought at first someone from that house chased lindsey down and grabbed her and took her somewhere.  I had thought something awful had happened inside that house and lindsey ran out.  that was my first thought on this case... so I dug, and dug, and dug, I asked so many questions to locals.  And because kara doesn't know anyone there they all ragged on her and melissa... turns out these people are marilyn's friends and once I figured that out, I just acted like yah I believe you, tell me more.  oh they told me more alright, and every time they told me more the stories changed, always oh well marilyn says this or that, it was like this not that, well people who tell lies can't keep them straight.  and this last one about roger, if it was not so pathetic, it is hilarious. 

but it is all these lies and these friends of hers etc that has really hindered the search for lindsey, and that just p.... es.. me off to no end... I don't care if they don't like melissa or kara, heck why don't they just thump one another if that is the case, but to sway people into believing the very people who are trying the hardest to search for lindsey are the ones who are involved in her disappearance, that is off the charts.  and I notice these "caring" liars are not out there looking for this girl, why not?  do they know where she is?  and do they want no searching?  you just have to wonder.

but really what I wanted to say, if you are reading here melissa baum, or kara, I want you to know, we are backing you all the way, and we are going to figure out what the heck is really going on here.  and by any means we possibly have, we ARE going to help you.  I am sick of this. 


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3 7/28/09 -
Post by: no rose colored glasses on August 10, 2009, 12:58:45 PM
There is one thing to dislike someone, but it is an entirely different situation to be doing what Marilyn apparently is doing and poisoning the towns people, but why? What kind of hold could this woman possibly have on some of the towns people, she doesn't even live there now?


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3 7/28/09 -
Post by: Tamikosmom on August 10, 2009, 01:05:31 PM
KARA KAMPEN ... SCOTT WILLIAMS ... MELISSA BAUM

DD

Considering the timing of the confirmed sighting of Lindsey as well as Scott Williams' passing of a polygraph ... I believe that Kara Kampen and Scott Williams had no knowledge as to the circumstances pertaining to why Lindsey failing to arrive home on the evening of June 26, 2009 after leaving their residence.

Considering Melissa Baum's passing of the polygraph ... I believe that Lindsey's mother had no initial knowledge pertaining to the circumstances encompassing why her daughter failed to arrive home on the evening of June 26, 2009.

Janet



Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3 7/28/09 -
Post by: doubledecker on August 10, 2009, 01:14:04 PM
KARA KAMPEN ... SCOTT WILLIAMS ... MELISSA BAUM

DD

Considering the timing of the confirmed sighting of Lindsey as well as Scott Williams' passing of a polygraph ... I believe that Kara Kampen and Scott Williams had no knowledge as to the circumstances pertaining to why Lindsey failing to arrive home on the evening of June 26, 2009 after leaving their residence.

Considering Melissa Baum's passing of the polygraph ... I believe that Lindsey's mother had no initial knowledge pertaining to the circumstances encompassing why her daughter failed to arrive home on the evening of June 26, 2009.

Janet



too bad the people in that town don't come to that conclusion. 



instead they say "its best we don't get involved"  yes, exact words when they pulled the search center... I know I might catch heck over that statement out here, but it is true. 

see what is happening... people won't "get involved"  why?  what are they afraid of?  who is influencing that kind of decision?  stop and think about how anyone could just decide out of the blue "better not get involved"  INVOLVED IN "WHAT"?  just what is there to get "involved" in? or NOT get "involved" in?  Invovled in trying to help search or find out what happened to her?  is this what it is?  no one wants to get involved in doing something to find out the truth?  well, why would no one want to bet "involved" in that? 

well, I can just about guess why... it will land someone in prison, that is why.  Then whoever is involved in Lindsey's being gone is going to be mad... you know how that goes, "retaliation"... from whom?  well, just open your eyes people... if you look hard enough it all over, it might not be written on the wall, but it is sure as heck "written". 

Do I realize what I am getting into here.  You bet I do... this whole thing could end but that is not up to me sad to say, it is up to someone who KNOWS.


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3 7/28/09 -
Post by: Tracygirl on August 10, 2009, 01:17:21 PM
Melissa Baum if you are reading this. I would like you to know, from one mother to another, I feel for you and offer to you my full support. I too have a son with autism and I know what that is like, especially if you are dealing with IGNORANCE.
I am an advocate for disabled children and adults, I would like to offer myself to you if you need any guidence or help with services for your son. I know how hard it is to get services in a small town. You can contact me by getting my email from Klaas or by contacting DD through her forum. If you would like to just talk, I am willing to listen. My heart and full support goes out to you.

Kara from the beginning I could see you had good intentions. Thank you for taking all that you have and for caring about Lindsey.

Marilyn you need to start telling the truth...NOW.


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3 7/28/09 -
Post by: doubledecker on August 10, 2009, 01:18:18 PM
and you know what they say

he who rats first gets immunity...

and you know how that goes

there is always some weak .... who rats you out. 

so think about that, who wants immunity and who wants to go to some shu for the rest of your life or worse. 

someone weakster amongst you is going to rat you out, so time has come today, and that's all folks.


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3 7/28/09 -
Post by: Sister on August 10, 2009, 01:41:17 PM
dd, that's it . . . dag, the immunity card.  You're so right, first one out of the box will get it.  Now that's an incentive.


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3 7/28/09 -
Post by: Tamikosmom on August 10, 2009, 01:57:33 PM
There is one thing to dislike someone, but it is an entirely different situation to be doing what Marilyn apparently is doing and poisoning the towns people, but why? What kind of hold could this woman possibly have on some of the towns people, she doesn't even live there now?

no rose colored glasses

What proof is there that mlachester is not revealing the truth regarding what she knows encompassing the dynamics of the Lindsey's relationship with her mother and brother.

I cannot comprehend why this woman's words are being discredited.  Please fill me in.

 ::MonkeyNoNo::

Janet


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3 7/28/09 -
Post by: no rose colored glasses on August 10, 2009, 02:16:48 PM
There is one thing to dislike someone, but it is an entirely different situation to be doing what Marilyn apparently is doing and poisoning the towns people, but why? What kind of hold could this woman possibly have on some of the towns people, she doesn't even live there now?

no rose colored glasses

What proof is there that mlachester is not revealing the truth regarding what she knows encompassing the dynamics of the Lindsey's relationship with her mother and brother.

I cannot comprehend why this woman's words are being discredited.  Please fill me in.

 ::MonkeyNoNo::

Janet

I don't know Janet, I'm going by what the people who are investigating like DD and sister and the others, I will wait to see what will be posted later. I don't have any proof of anything, just coming to conclusions from reading, I have some gut feelings about one person that I can't shake, and I'm confused. What bothers me is the word retaliation, once someone gets that mindset, they will not talk.


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3 7/28/09 -
Post by: no rose colored glasses on August 10, 2009, 02:26:12 PM
There is one question that is nagging at me. After Lindsey left Kara's home, am I understanding she went to another house to ask if she could sleep over there? Now, why, did she just not want to go home?


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3 7/28/09 -
Post by: Sister on August 10, 2009, 02:33:38 PM
I for one, and maybe only one of a few, am sticking up for melissa baum and kara.  In the beginning I looked at kara to the point of probably knowing what color her undies are LOL  I mean I dug and dug and basically accused her of anything and everything.  What I did through email and asked her is horrendous, but I had my thoughts on her because lindsey left that house and there was no dog scent and she got nowhere etc.  I really thought at first someone from that house chased lindsey down and grabbed her and took her somewhere.  I had thought something awful had happened inside that house and lindsey ran out.  that was my first thought on this case... so I dug, and dug, and dug, I asked so many questions to locals.  And because kara doesn't know anyone there they all ragged on her and melissa... turns out these people are marilyn's friends and once I figured that out, I just acted like yah I believe you, tell me more.  oh they told me more alright, and every time they told me more the stories changed, always oh well marilyn says this or that, it was like this not that, well people who tell lies can't keep them straight.  and this last one about roger, if it was not so pathetic, it is hilarious. 

but it is all these lies and these friends of hers etc that has really hindered the search for lindsey, and that just p.... es.. me off to no end... I don't care if they don't like melissa or kara, heck why don't they just thump one another if that is the case, but to sway people into believing the very people who are trying the hardest to search for lindsey are the ones who are involved in her disappearance, that is off the charts.  and I notice these "caring" liars are not out there looking for this girl, why not?  do they know where she is?  and do they want no searching?  you just have to wonder.

but really what I wanted to say, if you are reading here melissa baum, or kara, I want you to know, we are backing you all the way, and we are going to figure out what the heck is really going on here.  and by any means we possibly have, we ARE going to help you.  I am sick of this. 

 ::MonkeyAngel::


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3 7/28/09 -
Post by: love4ever on August 10, 2009, 02:44:16 PM
DD

My speculations are just that ... speculations.  UNTIL ... the truth is revealed this wannabe detective will stand by her speculations and backup.

DD ... considering your words that it is rumored that Wayne Watnee has a "solid alibi" for the time that Lindsey Baum went missing ... until revealed otherwise .... I will no longer consider him a person of interest ... for now.

Considering mlachester's support base in McCleary ... considering her relationship with Lindsey ... considering the involvment of CPS, 911 and the small McCleary police force in alleged incidences ...  until revealed otherwise ... I will not regard her a person of interest.

DD ... I look forward to your revelation encompassing mlachester and Roger but ... until then ....

 ::MonkeyDevil2::

Janet

 

The thing about all this and that is for one, when you research and you find things that are official documents or not, it is then you get a feel for ones personality, as we see here. We are not professionals. Another thing is it is often times it is useful and intellectual to be objective to anothers research or possibility. The last thing is how can one make speculations about only what they have read in the media and research done by others, if one is so persistent in making speculations, then where is their own hours of research that they have found; that hasn't been posted by the media or other research sources? It would be great if the ones who focus on others research show us some of their own work that would be prove otherwise. I know that some of us spend hours and hours and dedication to these children and all involved. Research likes to further it's  progression and when they can not conclude on an area of research, they move on. However, they never forget the area of research in which they could not connect, but hope to find a missing link along the way, that will.


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3 7/28/09 -
Post by: love4ever on August 10, 2009, 02:53:10 PM
 I do not believe in perfection in anyones home or of anothers , but I do believe that  manipulation or coercing of a child is ethically and immorally wrong., especially when done so because one vindictive parent wants to spite the other, and uses a child to do so. How sad is that?


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3 7/28/09 -
Post by: Tamikosmom on August 10, 2009, 02:59:07 PM
There is one question that is nagging at me. After Lindsey left Kara's home, am I understanding she went to another house to ask if she could sleep over there? Now, why, did she just not want to go home?

According to LE ... Lindsey disappeared following the confirmed sighting shortly after 9:30 PM  at Maple and 5th .... within minutes of leaving Kara Kampen's residence between 9:15 PM and 9:30 PM ... within minutes of her home..

On August 2, 2005 ... there does not appear to be any official revelation to the contrary.

Janet

+++++++

MELISSA BAUM

Daily World – August 2, 2009-08-02


From the front step of her nearby home, Melissa Baum can almost see its intersection with Fifth Street where her 11-year-old daughter took her last known steps into oblivion.

“I feel like she’s right under my nose and I can’t find her,” she said.

http://**/articles/2009/08/02/local_news/doc4a75285b085b5140001671.txt






Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3 7/28/09 -
Post by: Tamikosmom on August 10, 2009, 03:14:01 PM
I do not believe in perfection in anyones home or of anothers , but I do believe that  manipulation or coercing of a child is ethically and immorally wrong., especially when done so because one vindictive parent wants to spite the other, and uses a child to do so. How sad is that?


I agree 100% if that is what happened in regards to mlachester.

However ... until there is any backup to the contrary ... I will stand by my contention that this woman has revealed the truth concerning her personal, first-hand  knowledge of the dynamics encompassing Lindsey's relationship with her mother and brother.  After all ... 911, CPS and the small McCleary LE were all a part of her allegations.  I contend that mlachester ... out of frustration ... is speaking out now and revealing what LE and CPS failed to take seriously at the time and ... could have possibly prevented whatever happened to Lindsey in the two block stretch following the confirmed sighting..

After DD reveals what she has been privy to behind the scenes ... my present position on the mlachester issue may change.  My speculations are based on what is now known.

Janet

 


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3 7/28/09 -
Post by: Sister on August 10, 2009, 03:32:18 PM
other than from ML, is there another factual source that LE and CPS failed to do their jobs? And I am not being condescending . . . what factual source, like a report file, 911 tapes are in the public domain, file number, case number, case worker or source other than speculation.  This sure would help in the research.  I'm simply not finding it in any research.  In fact, what I am finding is not looking good for ML, but I won't put it out until it can be substantiated by one more factual source.


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3 7/28/09 -
Post by: no rose colored glasses on August 10, 2009, 03:34:32 PM
other than from ML, is there another factual source that LE and CPS failed to do their jobs? And I am not being condescending . . . what factual source, like a report file, 911 tapes are in the public domain, file number, case number, case worker or source other than speculation.  This sure would help in the research.  I'm simply not finding it in any research.  In fact, what I am finding is not looking good for ML, but I won't put it out until it can be substantiated by one more factual source.
I can't wait to read all of this, because I also was believing Marilyn until I really looked into her eyes and saw craziness, nothing scientific just an observation.


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3 7/28/09 -
Post by: Tamikosmom on August 10, 2009, 03:53:07 PM
other than from ML, is there another factual source that LE and CPS failed to do their jobs? And I am not being condescending . . . what factual source, like a report file, 911 tapes are in the public domain, file number, case number, case worker or source other than speculation.  This sure would help in the research.  I'm simply not finding it in any research.  In fact, what I am finding is not looking good for ML, but I won't put it out until it can be substantiated by one more factual source.
I can't wait to read all of this, because I also was believing Marilyn until I really looked into her eyes and saw craziness, nothing scientific just an observation.

no rose colored glasses

I would love to look into Marilyn's eyes.  Would you or another Monkey please provide a link.

Thank you.

Janet


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3 7/28/09 -
Post by: sherip on August 10, 2009, 03:53:41 PM
I do not believe in perfection in anyones home or of anothers , but I do believe that  manipulation or coercing of a child is ethically and immorally wrong., especially when done so because one vindictive parent wants to spite the other, and uses a child to do so. How sad is that?


I agree 100% if that is what happened in regards to mlachester.

However ... until there is any backup to the contrary ... I will stand by my contention that this woman has revealed the truth concerning her personal, first-hand  knowledge of the dynamics encompassing Lindsey's relationship with her mother and brother.  After all ... 911, CPS and the small McCleary LE were all a part of her allegations.  I contend that mlachester ... out of frustration ... is speaking out now and revealing what LE and CPS failed to take seriously at the time and ... could have possibly prevented whatever happened to Lindsey in the two block stretch following the confirmed sighting..

After DD reveals what she has been privy to behind the scenes ... my present position on the mlachester issue may change.  My speculations are based on what is now known.

Janet

 
I have been searching thru previous posts with no luck trying to find where MLachaster wrote a piece talking about Lindsey and how she had tried to help her basically defending herself- does anyone know here that information can be found.  For some reason I thought she (ML) said that "she" was the one that sent Josh home after the fight between Lindsey and Josh - that she (ML) was at a friends house, and then on her way to work at the retirement home a little later she also was one of the 2 witnesses that saw Lindsey walking home from KaraK house.  I may be wrong but does anyone else remember that?   If that is true don't you think that she would have at least stopped the car and briefly talked to Lindsey, given the fact the she had less than an hour earlier "saved" Lindsey from her brother and at least ask her if she was OK?  If it was ML who sent Josh home then she is ultimately the person responsible for Lindsey being alone that night.  Her mother at that point thought she was with her brother.


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3 7/28/09 -
Post by: no rose colored glasses on August 10, 2009, 03:58:20 PM
other than from ML, is there another factual source that LE and CPS failed to do their jobs? And I am not being condescending . . . what factual source, like a report file, 911 tapes are in the public domain, file number, case number, case worker or source other than speculation.  This sure would help in the research.  I'm simply not finding it in any research.  In fact, what I am finding is not looking good for ML, but I won't put it out until it can be substantiated by one more factual source.
I can't wait to read all of this, because I also was believing Marilyn until I really looked into her eyes and saw craziness, nothing scientific just an observation.

no rose colored glasses

I would love to look into Marilyn's eyes.  Would you or another Monkey please provide a link.

Thank you.

Janet
It was her myspace page, I don't recall what page that it was on, I'm sure someone here has it.


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3 7/28/09 -
Post by: Tamikosmom on August 10, 2009, 04:08:05 PM
other than from ML, is there another factual source that LE and CPS failed to do their jobs? And I am not being condescending . . . what factual source, like a report file, 911 tapes are in the public domain, file number, case number, case worker or source other than speculation.  This sure would help in the research.  I'm simply not finding it in any research.  In fact, what I am finding is not looking good for ML, but I won't put it out until it can be substantiated by one more factual source.

So far no research has been revealed on the forum that mlachester's words are fabrications.  Until then I will consider mlachester as a person who has in the past had Lindsey's best interest at heart in regards to alleged abuse at the hands of her mother and brother and ... mlachester is presently speaking out in anger and frustration revealing a system that failed to protect a missing 10 year old little girl.

I would love to believe that Lindsey Baum had one advocate in her world that attempted to intervene on her behalf.  If DD's research reveals that mlachester was not that advocate ... then so be it.  I will concede.

Janet

++++++

Could it be the McCleary Law Enforcement is focusing attention away from Melissa and Josh as suspects in an attempt to shield the "powers that be" who disregarded Marilyn's attempt to get protection for Lindsey from both her Mother and brother?

No throwing bananas please.  Neighbour who makes delicious loaves with my brused and over-riped bananas has taken off this morning with hubby for a week's vacation.

 ::MonkeyHaHa::

Janet

++++++++

ACCORDING TO MLACHESTER:

Rob
Re: Lindsey Baum #3 7/28/09 -
« Reply #896 on: August 08, 2009, 04:29:38 PM »


Quote
As far as the abuse Lindsey went threw the MPD knows the FBI also knows.

Quote
They have the reports I help Lindsey file

Quote
Just as of this moring when the FBI was at my house I made a comment about the 911 calls and the call to CPS.

http://scaredmonkeys.net/index.php?action=post;quote=904672;topic=5790.880;num_replies=1162;sesc=28414912316d49a494791fe51542bb71


doubledecker
Re: Lindsey Baum #3 7/28/09 -
« Reply #976 on: Today at 12:34:07 AM »


this is to me from a friend of marilyns

... one time she called CPS on melissa baum when lindsey came over with welts from her calfs to her back.  she was horrified and i think a couple others saw this at her house.  the other incidents with Josh were chasing her with knife, shovel, choking, and at least one other attack against another individual (and here i forgot to write it down, i think it was a female but can't recall if it was an adult or child, but marilyn made the call).  she says he was very violent and went to Juvi many times!  hmm.  anyway, i don't think she's lying, that's a whole lot to be lying about, haha

http://scaredmonkeys.net/index.php?topic=5790.msg904974#msg904974


mlachester:
To answer the questions everyone has asked, Yes I have talked to police and as far as things being unfounded its more of lazy work by cps and I don't know what the police were thinking. Since Lindsey has gone missing I have helped serch and put fliers up. I was called by the agents investigating and told them what I know. And this is no nick name everyone in McCleary knows who I am. Its no big secret she had came to my house to call 911 when her brother had done things to her. I hope lindsey is hiding and she finds a way to get to someone for help to tell them why. But as everyday gose by the fear gets worse.

http://www.king5.com/topstories/stories/NW_063009WAB-Mccleary-girl-search-LJ.1fc0b759.html?ocp=2#slcgm_comments_anchor


mlachester:
I am close to her and I know a lot more than the media or law enforcement are saying right now. As for Scanner, sorry if you don't like the truth but I have never been one to keep the truth in and she should of been taken the first time she called 911 from my house asking for help instead of put in a police car and taken back to her abuser!"

http://www.king5.com/topstories/stor...omments_anchor




Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3 7/28/09 -
Post by: Sister on August 10, 2009, 04:20:53 PM
Janet, I'm sorry if my question was misleading.  I wanted to know if you have a factual source other than ML?  I have read and re-read what others have put on the forum, I am merely asking if you have another factual source other than ML that LE and CPS have been negligent?  The research I do is based on facts and that is why I ask in this manner.  I've read the opinions, etc., and as interesting as they are, to "prove" something, there needs to be facts to be checked for accuracy.  But, hey, I know I'm preaching to the choir
 ::MonkeyCool::


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3 7/28/09 -
Post by: Tamikosmom on August 10, 2009, 04:23:33 PM
sherip

If Melissa Baum was under the impression that Lindsey would be walking home with Josh ... that impression must have been erased the minute Josh walked into the house after being instructed to return home by the  "family friend" or ... did Josh not go straight home as instructed.  If not ... where was this young man between 9:15 PM and 9:30 PM following his sister's departure from Kara Kampen's residence.

Considering the strained relationship between Marilyn and Melissa ... I do not believe Marilyn was the person who instructed Josh to return home following the argument with his sister.  After all ... Melissa refers to this person as a "family friend".

Janet

++++++

ABC News - June 30, 2009

Baum said she last saw her daughter when Lindsey, along with her 12-year-old brother, Josh, headed out to Lindsey's friend's house in hopes she could get permission to spend the night at the Baum's house.

Baum said her children began squabbling over the use of Josh's bike on the way there and were stopped by a family friend who sent Josh home to end the argument. Lindsey continued on to her friend's house.

http://abcnews.go.com/US/story?id=7966924&page=1


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3 7/28/09 -
Post by: Tamikosmom on August 10, 2009, 04:33:51 PM
Janet, I'm sorry if my question was misleading.  I wanted to know if you have a factual source other than ML?  I have read and re-read what others have put on the forum, I am merely asking if you have another factual source other than ML that LE and CPS have been negligent?  The research I do is based on facts and that is why I ask in this manner.  I've read the opinions, etc., and as interesting as they are, to "prove" something, there needs to be facts to be checked for accuracy.  But, hey, I know I'm preaching to the choir
 ::MonkeyCool::

Nope.  No inside information.  No skills to research public records.

 ::MonkeyHaHa::

Sister ... media sources is where it is at to a large extent.

Consider Mlachester did not attempt to hide her identity when commenting on the KOMO website and ... she involved 911, CPS as well as the small McCleary Police Department in her allegations ... I am giving her the benefit of the doubt that she is one person who did attempt to be an advocate for Lindsey Baum.

I could be wrong in my speculations regarding this woman and ... I am anticipating DD's revelation ... revelations that will contradics all the hope that I am at present embracing.

Until then ...

Janet.


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3 7/28/09 -
Post by: no rose colored glasses on August 10, 2009, 04:34:04 PM
Well if Josh did go straight home, which I have no idea, you would think that Melissa would be wondering if Lindsey was going to walk home alone or spend the night. She could have made a phone call to Kara to find out.


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3 7/28/09 -
Post by: sherip on August 10, 2009, 04:46:16 PM
Well if Josh did go straight home, which I have no idea, you would think that Melissa would be wondering if Lindsey was going to walk home alone or spend the night. She could have made a phone call to Kara to find out.


sherip

If Melissa Baum was under the impression that Lindsey would be walking home with Josh ... that impression must have been erased the minute Josh walked into the house after being instructed to return home by the  "family friend" or ... did Josh not go straight home as instructed.  If not ... where was this young man between 9:15 PM and 9:30 PM following his sister's departure from Kara Kampen's residence.

Considering the strained relationship between Marilyn and Melissa ... I do not believe Marilyn was the person who instructed Josh to return home following the argument with his sister.  After all ... Melissa refers to this person as a "family friend".

Janet

++++++

ABC News - June 30, 2009

Baum said she last saw her daughter when Lindsey, along with her 12-year-old brother, Josh, headed out to Lindsey's friend's house in hopes she could get permission to spend the night at the Baum's house.

Baum said her children began squabbling over the use of Josh's bike on the way there and were stopped by a family friend who sent Josh home to end the argument. Lindsey continued on to her friend's house.

http://abcnews.go.com/US/story?id=7966924&page=1


*******************************************************************************


Thank you  Janet - I just found what I was looking for under KerraK postsand I was wrong about MLachester being person who saw Lindsey and sent Josh home.


(I dont know if I brought that forward correctly or not - Sorry if it is not correct format.)


Quote


I do not think this is MLaChester,I think Kara said it was or that this witness was heading to work at the BeeHive.
Maybe Kara can clear that up for us.
I have to go now but will watch the other videos tomorrow.
Have a good night you all.


Kera K says:
No that was not MLaChester who saw them. It was someone else. As for working at the Beehive - I am part of that confusion apparently the witness was also the one who broke up the fight but she does not work at the BeeHive.

The BeeHive thing I got confused with something someone else had said - so I apologize for that because that was not correct.




Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3 7/28/09 -
Post by: Sister on August 10, 2009, 04:48:37 PM
Janet, I'm sorry if my question was misleading.  I wanted to know if you have a factual source other than ML?  I have read and re-read what others have put on the forum, I am merely asking if you have another factual source other than ML that LE and CPS have been negligent?  The research I do is based on facts and that is why I ask in this manner.  I've read the opinions, etc., and as interesting as they are, to "prove" something, there needs to be facts to be checked for accuracy.  But, hey, I know I'm preaching to the choir
 ::MonkeyCool::
Nope.  No inside information.  No skills to research public records.
 ::MonkeyHaHa::
Sister ... media sources is where it is at to a large extent.
Consider Mlachester did not attempt to hide her identity when commenting on the KOMO website and ... she involved 911, CPS as well as the small McCleary Police Department in her allegations ... I am giving her the benefit of the doubt that she is one person who did attempt to be an advocate for Lindsey Baum.
I could be wrong in my speculations regarding this woman and ... I am anticipating DD's revelation ... revelations that will contradics all the hope that I am at present embracing.
Until then ...
Janet.

I understand, but I can't find any media sources that are calling LE and CPS negligent.  Anyway . . . some issues of domestic violence (not in relation to the Baums or the KK family) have been uncovered and even a photo of a boy (not Josh by the way) with what looks like a black eye or at least a bad cut over the eye.  That's why I was asking about factual sources -- don't want to put it out unless it can be substantiated.


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3 7/28/09 -
Post by: pink angel on August 10, 2009, 04:52:14 PM
Regarding ML. There is nothing that she has said, that can be proven. It's all rumor. Where is her facts? Where is her proof?

I think she is full of BS myself. She obviously has a beef with Lindsey's mom and Josh and will say anything possible to discredit them. This alone is her self-serving motive, PAYBACK. Her son has been in fights with Josh. Wanna bet she also thought MB was the one who called animal control on her regarding her dogs? I think she's a vindictive crazy neighbor is all.

When it comes to a missing child or a crime and you have information or personal knowledge regarding a family or family issues, that may be useful to helping find her or may be useful in regards to the investigation, you go to police with your information, you don't go posting in on a comment section of a newspaper or you don't post it on a forum.

The police have said that Melissa Baum has passed a lie detector and they said they ruled all family members out as suspects. They rarely do this publicly. They rarely talk about if people pass lie detector tests and they rarely clear family members publicly.  They look at family first thing and they look at them HARD. FBI was involved at this time too.

When asked "are family members suspect". Police usually always answer "EVERYONE IS A SUSPECT". They rarely RULE OUT family members to the public. They did that here. To me that says they are confident that Melissa or Josh had no involvement in Lindsey becoming a missing person.   jmo


Quote
Police have ruled out all family members as suspects.
http://www.king5.com/localnews/stories/NW_063009WAB-Mccleary-girl-search-LJ.1fc0b759.html








Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3 7/28/09 -
Post by: sherip on August 10, 2009, 04:53:20 PM
Well if Josh did go straight home, which I have no idea, you would think that Melissa would be wondering if Lindsey was going to walk home alone or spend the night. She could have made a phone call to Kara to find out.

I thought that too.  I can't help but wonder who Josh may have talked to on his way home - especially if he was upset. According to Kara K - WW was only real friend that Josh had.  I dont' think that Josh had anything to do with Lindsey being gone directly but if he talked to anyone or anyone witnessed the arguement it would not be too far of a reach to think that there was a pretty good chance that Lindsey would be returning that direction for the bike in a very short time.



Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3 7/28/09 -
Post by: A_News_Junkie_Monkey on August 10, 2009, 05:01:48 PM
Pink - do we know if FBI did the polygraphs?  If they did, then I am good with that!

BTW - when you get a chance, look in the media links at a post I left you.  I keep missing you.


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3 7/28/09 -
Post by: sunshine12 on August 10, 2009, 05:10:36 PM
There is one question that is nagging at me. After Lindsey left Kara's home, am I understanding she went to another house to ask if she could sleep over there? Now, why, did she just not want to go home?

she allegedly went to another home according to someone, who that person is i dont know, but i wouldn't be suprised if it came from mlachester.  so we don't know if it's true or reliable information.

if in fact she did stop at someone's house and ask if she could sleep over maybe she didn't want to go home because of the fight her and josh had? i dont know

i am just patiently waiting to hear about the tangled web mlachester has created so that we can all move on and continue to search for lindsey.


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3 7/28/09 -
Post by: no rose colored glasses on August 10, 2009, 05:12:16 PM
There is one question that is nagging at me. After Lindsey left Kara's home, am I understanding she went to another house to ask if she could sleep over there? Now, why, did she just not want to go home?

she allegedly went to another home according to someone, who that person is i dont know, but i wouldn't be suprised if it came from mlachester.  so we don't know if it's true or reliable information.

if in fact she did stop at someone's house and ask if she could sleep over maybe she didn't want to go home because of the fight her and josh had? i dont know

i am just patiently waiting to hear about the tangled web mlachester has created so that we can all move on and continue to search for lindsey.
I'm waiting also, maybe we will find out if it is true or not about Lindsey going to another house to ask to sleep over.


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3 7/28/09 -
Post by: no rose colored glasses on August 10, 2009, 05:29:57 PM
I'm not too happy about what I'm seeing at WS, talking dirt on us here, but I guess they have the option to do so  ::MonkeyMad::


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3 7/28/09 -
Post by: Tamikosmom on August 10, 2009, 05:32:07 PM
Regarding ML. There is nothing that she has said, that can be proven. It's all rumor. Where is her facts? Where is her proof?

I think she is full of BS myself. She obviously has a beef with Lindsey's mom and Josh and will say anything possible to discredit them. This alone is her self-serving motive, PAYBACK. Her son has been in fights with Josh. Wanna bet she also thought MB was the one who called animal control on her regarding her dogs? I think she's a vindictive crazy neighbor is all.

When it comes to a missing child or a crime and you have information or personal knowledge regarding a family or family issues, that may be useful to helping find her or may be useful in regards to the investigation, you go to police with your information, you don't go posting in on a comment section of a newspaper or you don't post it on a forum.

The police have said that Melissa Baum has passed a lie detector and they said they ruled all family members out as suspects. They rarely do this publicly. They rarely talk about if people pass lie detector tests and they rarely clear family members publicly.  They look at family first thing and they look at them HARD. FBI was involved at this time too.

When asked "are family members suspect". Police usually always answer "EVERYONE IS A SUSPECT". They rarely RULE OUT family members to the public. They did that here. To me that says they are confident that Melissa or Josh had no involvement in Lindsey becoming a missing person.   jmo


Quote
Police have ruled out all family members as suspects.
http://www.king5.com/localnews/stories/NW_063009WAB-Mccleary-girl-search-LJ.1fc0b759.html


pink angel

I cannot find where ALL family members have been ruled out as suspects in the link you provided.

In the following article Melissa Baum and Scott Williams appear to be ruled out as persons of interest.

Janet

+++++++


KOMO News – July 2, 2009

The missing girl's mother, who wanted avoid becoming the center of the investigation, voluntarily took a polygraph test. The father of the girl's best friend, Scott Williams, also volunteered to take the test.

"At their requests polygraphs were given to them. They passed those polygraphs. We're comfortable with the information they've shared with us and comfortable with the timeline they've explained," said Grays Harbor County Undersheriff Rick Scott.

http://www.komonews.com/news/49651607.html


KING 5 News - June 30, 2009

Baum says she volunteered to take a polygraph late today. She wanted to clear herself, although police tell us she is not a suspect.

"I don't want people saying oh maybe the mom got mad at her and stashed her and now saying she ran away, I don't want anything like that," says Baum. "I want everyone to know my daughter is missing."

http://www.king5.com/localnews/stories/NW_063009WAB-Mccleary-girl-search-LJ.1fc0b759.html
 








Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3 7/28/09 -
Post by: sunshine12 on August 10, 2009, 05:37:06 PM
I'm not too happy about what I'm seeing at WS, talking dirt on us here, but I guess they have the option to do so  ::MonkeyMad::

omg i know! i noticed that too but didn't know if we were allowed to say anything about it. it made me so mad. but whatever, i think we are generating a lot more leads and important aspects about the case over here and i enjoy being able to express my opinion and do research. i feel like over there my freedom of speech would be stifled. i'm thankful to be among this group of posters here at scared monkeys.


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3 7/28/09 -
Post by: no rose colored glasses on August 10, 2009, 05:40:41 PM
I'm not too happy about what I'm seeing at WS, talking dirt on us here, but I guess they have the option to do so  ::MonkeyMad::

omg i know! i noticed that too but didn't know if we were allowed to say anything about it. it made me so mad. but whatever, i think we are generating a lot more leads and important aspects about the case over here and i enjoy being able to express my opinion and do research. i feel like over there my freedom of speech would be stifled. i'm thankful to be among this group of posters here at scared monkeys.
It would be, I'm a member but I stopped after a couple months.


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3 7/28/09 -
Post by: doubledecker on August 10, 2009, 05:52:53 PM
I'm not too happy about what I'm seeing at WS, talking dirt on us here, but I guess they have the option to do so  ::MonkeyMad::

interesting, can you link me?


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3 7/28/09 -
Post by: no rose colored glasses on August 10, 2009, 06:06:00 PM
I'm not too happy about what I'm seeing at WS, talking dirt on us here, but I guess they have the option to do so  ::MonkeyMad::

interesting, can you link me?
  http://websleuths.com/forums/showthread.php?t=87157           the last two to three pages in this thread.


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3 7/28/09 -
Post by: Tamikosmom on August 10, 2009, 06:23:24 PM
DID JOSH GO HOME AS INSTRUCTED?


Quote from: Northern Rose on July 08, 2009, 03:51:16 PM

Bike was left behind Shell, fight took place on Maple where neighbour sent Josh away.

Where did he go from there? 
Who picked up the bike as it was left at the Shell?
Did he go straight home and was anyone there?
Was he home at 9:15 - 9:30?


KaraK
Re: Lindsey Baum, 10y missing from McCleary, WA 6/26/09
« Reply #1653 on: July 08, 2009, 08:48:14 PM »


1) I can't answer the first one because I was told he went home but was not there myself.
2) The bike stayed at the Shell station. It was not picked up until 2 to 3 days after.
3) Josh's mom was home but again for the same reason as 1 I can not factually say he went straight home.
4) ?



Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3 7/28/09 -
Post by: Madre on August 10, 2009, 06:26:28 PM
Maybe the local over at WS that seems to be so skeptical about our DD needs to spend her time actually DOING SOMETHING to help find Lindsay (i.e. searches, helping to secure a command center locally, etc.) instead of reading here at SM.  I know many of us that live in other areas of the country would jump at it if we were local.  Secondly, if that poster can't understand someone talking to a stranger vs. Law Enforcement or their neighbors, then they don't know much about psychology (...those in that town talking to DD may not want exposure to LE for their own pathetic reasons).   ::MonkeyNoNo::

Keep up the great effort DD and other monkeys!!  Prayers for Lindsay.


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3 7/28/09 -
Post by: no rose colored glasses on August 10, 2009, 06:28:05 PM
Maybe the local over at WS that seems to be so skeptical about our DD needs to spend her time actually DOING SOMETHING to help find Lindsay (i.e. searches, helping to secure a command center locally, etc.) instead of reading here at SM.  I know many of us that live in other areas of the country would jump at it if we were local.  Secondly, if that poster can't understand someone talking to a stranger vs. Law Enforcement or their neighbors, then they don't know much about psychology (...those in that town talking to DD may not want exposure to LE for their own pathetic reasons).   ::MonkeyNoNo::

Keep up the great effort DD and other monkeys!!  Prayers for Lindsay.
They are just jealous, and it won't be the last time. I appreciate all the hard work DD and everyone is doing.


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3 7/28/09 -
Post by: Leroy on August 10, 2009, 06:31:31 PM
Maybe the local over at WS that seems to be so skeptical about our DD needs to spend her time actually DOING SOMETHING to help find Lindsay (i.e. searches, helping to secure a command center locally, etc.) instead of reading here at SM.  I know many of us that live in other areas of the country would jump at it if we were local.  Secondly, if that poster can't understand someone talking to a stranger vs. Law Enforcement or their neighbors, then they don't know much about psychology (...those in that town talking to DD may not want exposure to LE for their own pathetic reasons).   ::MonkeyNoNo::

Keep up the great effort DD and other monkeys!!  Prayers for Lindsay.

Well said!!


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3 7/28/09 -
Post by: doubledecker on August 10, 2009, 06:44:03 PM
obiviously the local upstanding people having coffee etc are not going to hear all the things about the drug world etc.  It is very understandable. 

how do I get the info out of them?  LOL  that's my secret but I get it. 

maybe I just have the right "connects". 

sad to say these people are not going to talk to the normal people who would point them out in a minute. And they are not going to run to the police and tell either.  my contact's trust me.  that's the difference. they don't trust the normal joe blow citizen. 

it's all okay, I'm use to it. 

but if they would rather not know what is really going on in their town, I can always quit saying anything I find out ::MonkeyWink::


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3 7/28/09 -
Post by: no rose colored glasses on August 10, 2009, 06:46:11 PM
obiviously the local upstanding people having coffee etc are not going to hear all the things about the drug world etc.  It is very understandable. 

how do I get the info out of them?  LOL  that's my secret but I get it. 

maybe I just have the right "connects". 

sad to say these people are not going to talk to the normal people who would point them out in a minute. And they are not going to run to the police and tell either.  my contact's trust me.  that's the difference. they don't trust the normal joe blow citizen. 

it's all okay, I'm use to it. 

but if they would rather not know what is really going on in their town, I can always quit saying anything I find out ::MonkeyWink::
Don't you dare  ::MonkeyCool::  Like I said they are jealous, seen it before.


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3 7/28/09 -
Post by: Tamikosmom on August 10, 2009, 07:02:00 PM
Friday night would have been entertainment night(Karaoke) I believe at local bar.  Anyone sitting outside on bench smoking would have a clear view of Maple Street just one block away.  I hope this was investigated for anyone seeing something out of the norm.  Also was there a patrolman on duty that night?  I believe there usually is someone on duty on the weekends and LB's route home would put her within 1/2 block of police station.  No one heard or seen anything is difficult to believe.  If someone has information about this guy with broken rib could have some connection with case should report it to local LE.  Let them determine if it is worthy or not.  Not to do so would be criminal.  Any information could rule someone in or out and help in the investigation.  I believe they have someone or persons of interest, but don't have enough for an arrest. IMO 

Could this be the reason that there have been no press releases from the McCleary LE.  Stuff is going on behind the scenes in an attempt to connect the dots so that justice will prevail for Lindsey Baum.

Could this be the reason that there appears to be little interest from the residents of McCleary in regards to a further search?

Has Melissa Baum spoken to any media source since August 2nd?

Janet

+++++


MELISSA BAUM - THEN

FOX News – July 1, 2009

Melissa Baum said she thinks her little girl Lindsey, who vanished Friday night, was snatched and is no longer in their hometown.

"I don’t think she’s in McCleary. I don’t," Baum told The Daily World of Aberdeen, Wash. "Why would they keep her in McCleary? Whoever took her went on the freeway. There are three ways to get out of McCleary and all three ways there are freeways within five or 10 minutes."

http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,5296...latestnews


MELISSA BAUM - NOW

Daily World – August 2, 2009

From the front step of her nearby home, Melissa Baum can almost see its intersection with Fifth Street where her 11-year-old daughter took her last known steps into oblivion.

“I feel like she’s right under my nose and I can’t find her,” she said.

http://**/articles/2009/08/02/local_news/doc4a75285b085b5140001671.txt


 


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3 7/28/09 -
Post by: klaasend on August 10, 2009, 07:09:13 PM
obiviously the local upstanding people having coffee etc are not going to hear all the things about the drug world etc.  It is very understandable. 

how do I get the info out of them?  LOL  that's my secret but I get it. 

maybe I just have the right "connects". 

sad to say these people are not going to talk to the normal people who would point them out in a minute. And they are not going to run to the police and tell either.  my contact's trust me.  that's the difference. they don't trust the normal joe blow citizen. 

it's all okay, I'm use to it. 

but if they would rather not know what is really going on in their town, I can always quit saying anything I find out ::MonkeyWink::

Don't quit DD  ::MonkeyCool::


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3 7/28/09 -
Post by: Tamikosmom on August 10, 2009, 07:12:06 PM
hmmm I was really wondering if you can see tag's from the bar, if you are reading can you let me know
What do you mean by tag's? I am not familiar with this.  I do know you look directly up 4th street from the front of the bar which is located on W. Simpson Ave.  Maple Street runs parallel to W Simpson Ave.  Mike's across the street from Gordon's recently closed.  I am familiar with the area and have spent a few weeks trying to catch up with past posts.  Sounds like Marilyn has some information, but I don't know if all of it is good.   ::MonkeyConfused::  I do know of a Roger that had a broken rib.  Could it be the same one?  Sounds like it.  I have no information about him so enough said.  Shortcake   

Thank you for that confirmation shortcake.

Janet

DD'S SOURCE - MLACHESTER'S FRIEND


... how about this, I just copy the email here,

this is to me from a friend of marilyns

... Also, she (mlachester) knows for a fact xxxxxxxx was there that night although she doesn't know if he still lives there.  She happens to know because he's a friend, his name is xxxxxxx, he works at xxxxxxxxxxx and that night he either lost his keys or left them at work or the bar (he goes there a lot) and had to crawl through his window at Kara's and fell and broke his rib.


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3 7/28/09 -
Post by: sunshine12 on August 10, 2009, 07:20:01 PM
Friday night would have been entertainment night(Karaoke) I believe at local bar.  Anyone sitting outside on bench smoking would have a clear view of Maple Street just one block away.  I hope this was investigated for anyone seeing something out of the norm.  Also was there a patrolman on duty that night?  I believe there usually is someone on duty on the weekends and LB's route home would put her within 1/2 block of police station.  No one heard or seen anything is difficult to believe.  If someone has information about this guy with broken rib could have some connection with case should report it to local LE.  Let them determine if it is worthy or not.  Not to do so would be criminal.  Any information could rule someone in or out and help in the investigation.  I believe they have someone or persons of interest, but don't have enough for an arrest. IMO 

Could this be the reason that there have been no press releases from the McCleary LE.  Stuff is going on behind the scenes in an attempt to connect the dots so that justice will prevail for Lindsey Baum.

Could this be the reason that there appears to be little interest from the residents of McCleary in regards to a further search?

Has Melissa Baum spoken to any media source since August 2nd?

Janet

+++++


MELISSA BAUM - THEN

FOX News – July 1, 2009

Melissa Baum said she thinks her little girl Lindsey, who vanished Friday night, was snatched and is no longer in their hometown.

"I don’t think she’s in McCleary. I don’t," Baum told The Daily World of Aberdeen, Wash. "Why would they keep her in McCleary? Whoever took her went on the freeway. There are three ways to get out of McCleary and all three ways there are freeways within five or 10 minutes."

http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,5296...latestnews


MELISSA BAUM - NOW

Daily World – August 2, 2009

From the front step of her nearby home, Melissa Baum can almost see its intersection with Fifth Street where her 11-year-old daughter took her last known steps into oblivion.

“I feel like she’s right under my nose and I can’t find her,” she said.

http://**/articles/2009/08/02/local_news/doc4a75285b085b5140001671.txt


 

tamiko's mom...the part that you bolded in red by the poster shortcake i am not sure of but i do wonder about because of the lack of press conferences/etc.. i have a strange feeling that the poster named shortcake is either mlachester, or one of mlachesters good friends so i guess i'm just taking everything with a grain of salt


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3 7/28/09 -
Post by: KarmaRoundUp on August 10, 2009, 07:24:41 PM
do tag and libby live at the home where the pool is that lindsey was swimming in on the day she disappeared?

shortcake-i was wonderin how you would know roger with the broken rib but not know tags?

could you tell us how roger broke his rib? or at least how he claims he broke it?
Pool house is or was Libby's house.




Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3 7/28/09 -
Post by: no rose colored glasses on August 10, 2009, 07:26:25 PM
Thanks so the pool house is Libby's house, so did Lindsey go there after Kara's house to see if she could sleep over, or is that something Marilyn is making up?


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3 7/28/09 -
Post by: shortcake on August 10, 2009, 07:26:38 PM
hmmm I was really wondering if you can see tag's from the bar, if you are reading can you let me know
What do you mean by tag's? I am not familiar with this.  I do know you look directly up 4th street from the front of the bar which is located on W. Simpson Ave.  Maple Street runs parallel to W Simpson Ave.  Mike's across the street from Gordon's recently closed.  I am familiar with the area and have spent a few weeks trying to catch up with past posts.  Sounds like Marilyn has some information, but I don't know if all of it is good.   ::MonkeyConfused::  I do know of a Roger that had a broken rib.  Could it be the same one?  Sounds like it.  I have no information about him so enough said.  Shortcake   

Tag is a person.  Guess you don't know who they are.  Sorry.  Figured if you were from there you would know them.  And you mentioned the bar and people sitting out there and he goes there. 

anyway, oh we know who roger is.  Interesting that you know who he is also and that he has a broken rib.  You must know marilyn quite well. ::MonkeyWink::

Thanks for clearing up tag's.  I do not know them.  I am familiar with the area, but I am not a local.  I am familiar with a Roger who broke a rib, but no knowledge of how or exactly where it happened.  I just know it was not too long ago.  I do not know where he lives, but I do not believe he drives.  I think he may be red herring.  I do not know a Marilyn.  If someone local is feeding her information about the case, she needs to get them to report it.  Let the LE filter through it.  One thing I noticed is after Lindsey's disappearence, locals became standoffish and made me feel not welcome being an outsider.  I think this is normal after such a incident.  I also don't believe locals had any fear of being out late.  After all this is a small town and nothing ever happens there.  Now I notice mothers holding on to thier kids walking down the street.  That town has changed.   ::MonkeyWaa::


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3 7/28/09 -
Post by: no rose colored glasses on August 10, 2009, 07:28:46 PM
shortcake, you answered some of my questions about what it is like there now. I wondered how the people were acting, if they are suspicious of each other.


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3 7/28/09 -
Post by: Tamikosmom on August 10, 2009, 07:35:44 PM
Friday night would have been entertainment night(Karaoke) I believe at local bar.  Anyone sitting outside on bench smoking would have a clear view of Maple Street just one block away.  I hope this was investigated for anyone seeing something out of the norm.  Also was there a patrolman on duty that night?  I believe there usually is someone on duty on the weekends and LB's route home would put her within 1/2 block of police station.  No one heard or seen anything is difficult to believe.  If someone has information about this guy with broken rib could have some connection with case should report it to local LE.  Let them determine if it is worthy or not.  Not to do so would be criminal.  Any information could rule someone in or out and help in the investigation.  I believe they have someone or persons of interest, but don't have enough for an arrest. IMO 

Could this be the reason that there have been no press releases from the McCleary LE.  Stuff is going on behind the scenes in an attempt to connect the dots so that justice will prevail for Lindsey Baum.

Could this be the reason that there appears to be little interest from the residents of McCleary in regards to a further search?

Has Melissa Baum spoken to any media source since August 2nd?

Janet

+++++


MELISSA BAUM - THEN

FOX News – July 1, 2009

Melissa Baum said she thinks her little girl Lindsey, who vanished Friday night, was snatched and is no longer in their hometown.

"I don’t think she’s in McCleary. I don’t," Baum told The Daily World of Aberdeen, Wash. "Why would they keep her in McCleary? Whoever took her went on the freeway. There are three ways to get out of McCleary and all three ways there are freeways within five or 10 minutes."

http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,5296...latestnews


MELISSA BAUM - NOW

Daily World – August 2, 2009

From the front step of her nearby home, Melissa Baum can almost see its intersection with Fifth Street where her 11-year-old daughter took her last known steps into oblivion.

“I feel like she’s right under my nose and I can’t find her,” she said.

http://**/articles/2009/08/02/local_news/doc4a75285b085b5140001671.txt


 

tamiko's mom...the part that you bolded in red by the poster shortcake i am not sure of but i do wonder about because of the lack of press conferences/etc.. i have a strange feeling that the poster named shortcake is either mlachester, or one of mlachesters good friends so i guess i'm just taking everything with a grain of salt

sunshine

Considering I am ... for now ....  giving mlachester the benefit of the doubt that justice for Lindsey Baum is her underlying motivation for speaking out concerning what she knows encompassing the Baum family dynamics ... it would not bother me if shortcake was mlachester or a friend of mlachester.

Until DD or another researcher reveals otherwise ...   I have no foundation that would warrant turning on the messenger.

Janet


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3 7/28/09 -
Post by: sunshine12 on August 10, 2009, 07:39:18 PM
hmmm I was really wondering if you can see tag's from the bar, if you are reading can you let me know
What do you mean by tag's? I am not familiar with this.  I do know you look directly up 4th street from the front of the bar which is located on W. Simpson Ave.  Maple Street runs parallel to W Simpson Ave.  Mike's across the street from Gordon's recently closed.  I am familiar with the area and have spent a few weeks trying to catch up with past posts.  Sounds like Marilyn has some information, but I don't know if all of it is good.   ::MonkeyConfused::  I do know of a Roger that had a broken rib.  Could it be the same one?  Sounds like it.  I have no information about him so enough said.  Shortcake   

Tag is a person.  Guess you don't know who they are.  Sorry.  Figured if you were from there you would know them.  And you mentioned the bar and people sitting out there and he goes there. 

anyway, oh we know who roger is.  Interesting that you know who he is also and that he has a broken rib.  You must know marilyn quite well. ::MonkeyWink::

Thanks for clearing up tag's.  I do not know them.  I am familiar with the area, but I am not a local.  I am familiar with a Roger who broke a rib, but no knowledge of how or exactly where it happened.  I just know it was not too long ago.  I do not know where he lives, but I do not believe he drives.  I think he may be red herring.  I do not know a Marilyn.  If someone local is feeding her information about the case, she needs to get them to report it.  Let the LE filter through it.  One thing I noticed is after Lindsey's disappearence, locals became standoffish and made me feel not welcome being an outsider.  I think this is normal after such a incident.  I also don't believe locals had any fear of being out late.  After all this is a small town and nothing ever happens there.  Now I notice mothers holding on to thier kids walking down the street.  That town has changed.   ::MonkeyWaa::

shortcake- if someone who doesnt even live in the town, as you have stated you do not live in mccleary, knows that this roger person broke a rib, how do you know this? where did you hear this from? i am just wondering... have you been in town a lot since her disappearance to know that the locals have become standoffish,  how are you so familiar with the area?  have you been there a lot recently that you would notice the mothers holding on to their kids walking down the street?


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3 7/28/09 -
Post by: sunshine12 on August 10, 2009, 07:40:42 PM
Janet-

just wanted to respond to ur last post. i understand ur point. i guess we are both still anxiously awaiting the truth behind mlachester!


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3 7/28/09 -
Post by: KarmaRoundUp on August 10, 2009, 07:47:49 PM
I'm not too happy about what I'm seeing at WS, talking dirt on us here, but I guess they have the option to do so  ::MonkeyMad::
I saw that too and decided I would not be bringing any more info over from them and they can just go on taking info from here and not giving us credit.
OOOOH,loving these new monkeys!
   ::MonkeyTease:: ::MonkeyMad:: ::MonkeyTease::


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3 7/28/09 -
Post by: sunshine12 on August 10, 2009, 07:53:30 PM
I'm not too happy about what I'm seeing at WS, talking dirt on us here, but I guess they have the option to do so  ::MonkeyMad::
I saw that too and decided I would not be bringing any more info over from them and they can just go on taking info from here and not giving us credit.
OOOOH,loving these new monkeys!
   ::MonkeyTease:: ::MonkeyMad:: ::MonkeyTease::

i could not agree more. the goal is to bring lindsey home, not to stifle freedom of speech and censor people when they might start to go down a road that could make some posters feel uncomfortable. 

saying prayers that lindsey is found soon ::MonkeyAngel::


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3 7/28/09 -
Post by: KarmaRoundUp on August 10, 2009, 08:00:51 PM
Thanks so the pool house is Libby's house, so did Lindsey go there after Kara's house to see if she could sleep over, or is that something Marilyn is making up?
I don't know if that's the same Libby but it makes sense to me it is.It's the pool house(just cleaned up some)and I can't remember where I got that pic or why I labeled it like I did.I think it must have been important for me to label it such at the time.

A while back when KaraK was posting,she mentioned some girls that didn't get along with Lindsey,they had a falling out or some skaubble.I think KaraK said that they had recently made up and that's whose house they were swimming at that day.I'll have to re read KaraK's posts to get the exact wording but my power went out last night(on the hottest friggen day/night this year!)and just recently came back on so I'm exhausted,so I'll look for the exact post tomorrow if you all don't find it.

I have always had my suspicions about this newly made up group of Lindsey's friends and that pool house.


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3 7/28/09 -
Post by: KarmaRoundUp on August 10, 2009, 08:04:41 PM
Thanks so the pool house is Libby's house, so did Lindsey go there after Kara's house to see if she could sleep over, or is that something Marilyn is making up?
Dang it,Sorry NoRose,forgot to answer your questions.
I am thinking that Lindsey did not want to go home that night because of the fight with Josh and I am believing that she did stop at someone's house to see if she could stay the night.Could be the pool house where she stopped.

Also,IF Lindsey stopped at someone's house to see if she could stay the night,why would this person not report that sighting to LE?
I'll tell you why.They have things they are hiding from LE.


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3 7/28/09 -
Post by: no rose colored glasses on August 10, 2009, 08:04:42 PM
Thanks so the pool house is Libby's house, so did Lindsey go there after Kara's house to see if she could sleep over, or is that something Marilyn is making up?
I don't know if that's the same Libby but it makes sense to me it is.It's the pool house(just cleaned up some)and I can't remember where I got that pic or why I labeled it like I did.I think it must have been important for me to label it such at the time.

A while back when KaraK was posting,she mentioned some girls that didn't get along with Lindsey,they had a falling out or some skaubble.I think KaraK said that they had recently made up and that's whose house they were swimming at that day.I'll have to re read KaraK's posts to get the exact wording but my power went out last night(on the hottest friggen day/night this year!)and just recently came back on so I'm exhausted,so I'll look for the exact post tomorrow if you all don't find it.

I have always had my suspicions about this newly made up group of Lindsey's friends and that pool house.
You take care  ::MonkeyAngel::  I would like to know if these girls are the same age, and if Marilyn is lying about Lindsey stopping at another house after Kara's house.


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3 7/28/09 -
Post by: no rose colored glasses on August 10, 2009, 08:06:38 PM
Thanks so the pool house is Libby's house, so did Lindsey go there after Kara's house to see if she could sleep over, or is that something Marilyn is making up?
Dang it,Sorry NoRose,forgot to answer your questions.
I am thinking that Lindsey did not want to go home that night because of the fight with Josh and I am believing that she did stop at someone's house to see if she could stay the night.Could be the pool house where she stopped.

Also,IF Lindsey stopped at someone's house to see if she could stay the night,why would this person not report that sighting to LE?
I'll tell you why.They have things they are hiding from LE.
The people in this house sure could have something to hide. But that fight with Josh seemed like it was a normal brother and sister fight, so I can't understand why she maybe didn't want to go home?


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3 7/28/09 -
Post by: no rose colored glasses on August 10, 2009, 08:09:05 PM
I'm not too happy about what I'm seeing at WS, talking dirt on us here, but I guess they have the option to do so  ::MonkeyMad::
I saw that too and decided I would not be bringing any more info over from them and they can just go on taking info from here and not giving us credit.
OOOOH,loving these new monkeys!
   ::MonkeyTease:: ::MonkeyMad:: ::MonkeyTease::

i could not agree more. the goal is to bring lindsey home, not to stifle freedom of speech and censor people when they might start to go down a road that could make some posters feel uncomfortable. 

saying prayers that lindsey is found soon ::MonkeyAngel::
Maybe they think or want people to think that everything is great in the town, I don't know what that was all about, except that they are mad that they don't have people over there that does such good research.


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3 7/28/09 -
Post by: KarmaRoundUp on August 10, 2009, 08:10:51 PM
I'm not too happy about what I'm seeing at WS, talking dirt on us here, but I guess they have the option to do so  ::MonkeyMad::
I saw that too and decided I would not be bringing any more info over from them and they can just go on taking info from here and not giving us credit.
OOOOH,loving these new monkeys!
   ::MonkeyTease:: ::MonkeyMad:: ::MonkeyTease::

i could not agree more. the goal is to bring lindsey home, not to stifle freedom of speech and censor people when they might start to go down a road that could make some posters feel uncomfortable. 

saying prayers that lindsey is found soon ::MonkeyAngel::
I agree,shoot it gets too confusing with everyone just using initials....mb,jb,ml,ww,lb,kk,mk,sw....on and on.
But that's them and we know who is the best.   ::MonkeyWink::
I pray for Lindsey every day.


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3 7/28/09 -
Post by: KarmaRoundUp on August 10, 2009, 08:14:57 PM
Thanks so the pool house is Libby's house, so did Lindsey go there after Kara's house to see if she could sleep over, or is that something Marilyn is making up?
I don't know if that's the same Libby but it makes sense to me it is.It's the pool house(just cleaned up some)and I can't remember where I got that pic or why I labeled it like I did.I think it must have been important for me to label it such at the time.

A while back when KaraK was posting,she mentioned some girls that didn't get along with Lindsey,they had a falling out or some skaubble.I think KaraK said that they had recently made up and that's whose house they were swimming at that day.I'll have to re read KaraK's posts to get the exact wording but my power went out last night(on the hottest friggen day/night this year!)and just recently came back on so I'm exhausted,so I'll look for the exact post tomorrow if you all don't find it.

I have always had my suspicions about this newly made up group of Lindsey's friends and that pool house.
You take care  ::MonkeyAngel::  I would like to know if these girls are the same age, and if Marilyn is lying about Lindsey stopping at another house after Kara's house.
Thanks NoRose
Marilyn is either lying about that or Lindsey really did stop and ask to spend the night.IF Marilyn is not lying then I wonder why she would do something like this to get her friends in trouble?


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3 7/28/09 -
Post by: KarmaRoundUp on August 10, 2009, 08:18:32 PM
Thanks so the pool house is Libby's house, so did Lindsey go there after Kara's house to see if she could sleep over, or is that something Marilyn is making up?
I don't know if that's the same Libby but it makes sense to me it is.It's the pool house(just cleaned up some)and I can't remember where I got that pic or why I labeled it like I did.I think it must have been important for me to label it such at the time.

A while back when KaraK was posting,she mentioned some girls that didn't get along with Lindsey,they had a falling out or some skaubble.I think KaraK said that they had recently made up and that's whose house they were swimming at that day.I'll have to re read KaraK's posts to get the exact wording but my power went out last night(on the hottest friggen day/night this year!)and just recently came back on so I'm exhausted,so I'll look for the exact post tomorrow if you all don't find it.

I have always had my suspicions about this newly made up group of Lindsey's friends and that pool house.
You take care  ::MonkeyAngel::  I would like to know if these girls are the same age, and if Marilyn is lying about Lindsey stopping at another house after Kara's house.
Acck,I did it again.IIRC KaraK said something about these girls(at pool house)maybe were a couple of years older than Lindsey?Or that the girls had older siblings....now it's gonna bug me so I'll go look now at KaraK's posts.


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3 7/28/09 -
Post by: Tamikosmom on August 10, 2009, 08:19:34 PM
Thanks so the pool house is Libby's house, so did Lindsey go there after Kara's house to see if she could sleep over, or is that something Marilyn is making up?
I don't know if that's the same Libby but it makes sense to me it is.It's the pool house(just cleaned up some)and I can't remember where I got that pic or why I labeled it like I did.I think it must have been important for me to label it such at the time.

A while back when KaraK was posting,she mentioned some girls that didn't get along with Lindsey,they had a falling out or some skaubble.I think KaraK said that they had recently made up and that's whose house they were swimming at that day.I'll have to re read KaraK's posts to get the exact wording but my power went out last night(on the hottest friggen day/night this year!)and just recently came back on so I'm exhausted,so I'll look for the exact post tomorrow if you all don't find it.

I have always had my suspicions about this newly made up group of Lindsey's friends and that pool house.
You take care  ::MonkeyAngel::  I would like to know if these girls are the same age, and if Marilyn is lying about Lindsey stopping at another house after Kara's house.

no rose colored glasses

Who states that mlachester was the source of story that Lindsey made a stop at another friend's home after leaving Kara Kampen's residence.

Thanks

Janet


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3 7/28/09 -
Post by: no rose colored glasses on August 10, 2009, 08:21:50 PM
I'm pretty sure I read that on here, if I'm wrong sorry. But I thought it was Marilyn who suggested that Lindsey stopped at another house that night.


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3 7/28/09 -
Post by: KarmaRoundUp on August 10, 2009, 08:23:37 PM
Thanks so the pool house is Libby's house, so did Lindsey go there after Kara's house to see if she could sleep over, or is that something Marilyn is making up?
Dang it,Sorry NoRose,forgot to answer your questions.
I am thinking that Lindsey did not want to go home that night because of the fight with Josh and I am believing that she did stop at someone's house to see if she could stay the night.Could be the pool house where she stopped.

Also,IF Lindsey stopped at someone's house to see if she could stay the night,why would this person not report that sighting to LE?
I'll tell you why.They have things they are hiding from LE.
The people in this house sure could have something to hide. But that fight with Josh seemed like it was a normal brother and sister fight, so I can't understand why she maybe didn't want to go home?
The fight probably looks normal to us but to a little girl(who may have felt threatened by her older and much bigger brother)it may have been scary.I used to be scared to death of my older brother but he was a bully.I don't know if Josh is/was.She might have felt extra scared because of the way her and Kayla teased Josh on the way to Kayla's house(safty in numbers).


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3 7/28/09 -
Post by: sunshine12 on August 10, 2009, 08:26:20 PM
janet-

i dont think it's been specifically stated that mlachester is the source who stated that lb stopped at another home on the way back to her house the night she disappeared, but i think if we look back at the previous posts, someone informed dd that lindsey did stop at another home on her way back to her house and asked to sleep over...

now this is only me speculating, and we will have to wait until we hear from dd again about everything involving mlachester, but it does make sense that it was one of mlachesters friends giving this information. again, until we are briefed again by dd about all of this, those of us that don't have this inside information are going to have to speculate.

(p.s- i really need to learn how to snip quotes so that people know what im talkin about when im responding to people, i just didnt want a really long quote stack)


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3 7/28/09 -
Post by: Leroy on August 10, 2009, 08:26:40 PM
Karma - does this help....

 Re: Lindsey Baum, 10y missing from McCleary, WA 6/26/09
« Reply #1493 on: July 06, 2009, 10:35:15 PM » 

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Quote from: Tracygirl on July 06, 2009, 10:32:54 PM
I don't have myspace but is there an account setting?

Kara how old are the girls that were picking on Lindsey?


They were 4th and 5th graders so between 9 and 11 years old.

Re: Lindsey Baum, 10y missing from McCleary, WA 6/26/09
« Reply #1499 on: July 06, 2009, 10:51:30 PM » 

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Quote from: Tracygirl on July 06, 2009, 10:38:40 PM
I believe you said they had made friends with her again, is that correct? If so, do you feel it was genuine? Do any of the girls go to the same church?


Yeah, they had just recently become friends again. It was part of that crowd where she had been swimming the day of and prior to her going missing.

I am not aware of which ones go to church I know Lindsey did not regularly attend though.

http://scaredmonkeys.net/index.php?topic=5541.msg867738#msg867738



Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3 7/28/09 -
Post by: no rose colored glasses on August 10, 2009, 08:26:46 PM
Thanks so the pool house is Libby's house, so did Lindsey go there after Kara's house to see if she could sleep over, or is that something Marilyn is making up?
Dang it,Sorry NoRose,forgot to answer your questions.
I am thinking that Lindsey did not want to go home that night because of the fight with Josh and I am believing that she did stop at someone's house to see if she could stay the night.Could be the pool house where she stopped.

Also,IF Lindsey stopped at someone's house to see if she could stay the night,why would this person not report that sighting to LE?
I'll tell you why.They have things they are hiding from LE.
The people in this house sure could have something to hide. But that fight with Josh seemed like it was a normal brother and sister fight, so I can't understand why she maybe didn't want to go home?
The fight probably looks normal to us but to a little girl(who may have felt threatened by her older and much bigger brother)it may have been scary.I used to be scared to death of my older brother but he was a bully.I don't know if Josh is/was.She might have felt extra scared because of the way her and Kayla teased Josh on the way to Kayla's house(safty in numbers).
That could be, it could have been a worse fight then we are being told, I don't have any siblings so I was just assuming it was just a normal spat.  ::MonkeyConfused::


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3 7/28/09 -
Post by: Tamikosmom on August 10, 2009, 08:26:57 PM
KARA KAMPEN - SWIMMING

KaraK
Re: Lindsey Baum, 10y missing from McCleary, WA 6/26/09
« Reply #1578 on: July 07, 2009, 10:37:19 PM »


I'm going to try and catch up I know that I missed some questions but there will be a delay - we have to meet friends at the park who will be releasing some B-day balloons for Lindsey.

The girls were swimming at the same home both days. At the time the girls were there it was 2 to 3 other girls (9 to 12), Lindsey, my daughter and the mother of one of the other girls (the mother to the child whose house they were at). - Hope that makes sense.

As for the argument: according to my daughter right now: it started at Shell station (this is where they left the bike) then they continued walking til they were on Maple (I know this was confused earlier possibly because I didn't understand what Kayla was saying) they were several houses down from mine when the family friend (who apparently was visiting a another friend on this street) told Josh to go home.    - Does that make sense? If not I'll try to make it clearer but I got to run but will come back and try to catch up on any ?'s.

http://scaredmonkeys.net/index.php?topic=5541.msg868953#msg868953


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3 7/28/09 -
Post by: no rose colored glasses on August 10, 2009, 08:27:53 PM
Thanks Leroy, so they were all around the same age group.


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3 7/28/09 -
Post by: Leroy on August 10, 2009, 08:30:49 PM
Thanks Leroy, so they were all around the same age group.

Your welcome.  I hope its not too confusing...I dont know how to bring up posts from a locked thread.

And as you can see, Janet is much better at making then easier to read than I   ::MonkeyHaHa:: 

Thanks Janet!


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3 7/28/09 -
Post by: shortcake on August 10, 2009, 08:32:22 PM
hmmm I was really wondering if you can see tag's from the bar, if you are reading can you let me know
What do you mean by tag's? I am not familiar with this.  I do know you look directly up 4th street from the front of the bar which is located on W. Simpson Ave.  Maple Street runs parallel to W Simpson Ave.  Mike's across the street from Gordon's recently closed.  I am familiar with the area and have spent a few weeks trying to catch up with past posts.  Sounds like Marilyn has some information, but I don't know if all of it is good.   ::MonkeyConfused::  I do know of a Roger that had a broken rib.  Could it be the same one?  Sounds like it.  I have no information about him so enough said.  Shortcake   

Tag is a person.  Guess you don't know who they are.  Sorry.  Figured if you were from there you would know them.  And you mentioned the bar and people sitting out there and he goes there. 

anyway, oh we know who roger is.  Interesting that you know who he is also and that he has a broken rib.  You must know marilyn quite well. ::MonkeyWink::

Thanks for clearing up tag's.  I do not know them.  I am familiar with the area, but I am not a local.  I am familiar with a Roger who broke a rib, but no knowledge of how or exactly where it happened.  I just know it was not too long ago.  I do not know where he lives, but I do not believe he drives.  I think he may be red herring.  I do not know a Marilyn.  If someone local is feeding her information about the case, she needs to get them to report it.  Let the LE filter through it.  One thing I noticed is after Lindsey's disappearence, locals became standoffish and made me feel not welcome being an outsider.  I think this is normal after such a incident.  I also don't believe locals had any fear of being out late.  After all this is a small town and nothing ever happens there.  Now I notice mothers holding on to thier kids walking down the street.  That town has changed.   ::MonkeyWaa::

shortcake- if someone who doesnt even live in the town, as you have stated you do not live in mccleary, knows that this roger person broke a rib, how do you know this? where did you hear this from? i am just wondering... have you been in town a lot since her disappearance to know that the locals have become standoffish,  how are you so familiar with the area?  have you been there a lot recently that you would notice the mothers holding on to their kids walking down the street?

I was there one day when a Roger walked in the local bar and I heard someone mention it.  I don't even remember exactly when it was.  I don know if this is the same person mentioned here.  I have been in town a few times before and after, Bear Festiful and all. It was not a happy occasion.  I don't want to share with you everything about me, I don't want to be shunned more.  I feel like you are examining me and don't know why.  I want Lindsey found like everyone else.  I drove through there recently and of course some things I notice, maybe it is just me.  I don't know why I decided to post, but I have a connection with the area. The first time I drove through the town after Lindsey's dissapearance, they were handing out flyers.  I almost broke down in tears.  I is so sad. ::MonkeyMad::


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3 7/28/09 -
Post by: KarmaRoundUp on August 10, 2009, 08:33:44 PM
Karma - does this help....

 Re: Lindsey Baum, 10y missing from McCleary, WA 6/26/09
« Reply #1493 on: July 06, 2009, 10:35:15 PM » 

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Quote from: Tracygirl on July 06, 2009, 10:32:54 PM
I don't have myspace but is there an account setting?

Kara how old are the girls that were picking on Lindsey?


They were 4th and 5th graders so between 9 and 11 years old.

Re: Lindsey Baum, 10y missing from McCleary, WA 6/26/09
« Reply #1499 on: July 06, 2009, 10:51:30 PM » 

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Quote from: Tracygirl on July 06, 2009, 10:38:40 PM
I believe you said they had made friends with her again, is that correct? If so, do you feel it was genuine? Do any of the girls go to the same church?


Yeah, they had just recently become friends again. It was part of that crowd where she had been swimming the day of and prior to her going missing.

I am not aware of which ones go to church I know Lindsey did not regularly attend though.

http://scaredmonkeys.net/index.php?topic=5541.msg867738#msg867738


Whoa Leroy!You are a life saver.Thank you,that's the posts.There should be a couple of more....saying something about older siblings?I'm not sure though.


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3 7/28/09 -
Post by: no rose colored glasses on August 10, 2009, 08:35:42 PM
I appreciate your info shortcake  ::MonkeyEek::


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3 7/28/09 -
Post by: doubledecker on August 10, 2009, 08:36:21 PM
let me clear this up. 

yes it is tag and libby's house lindsey was swimming at the day she went missing and the day before she went missing.  Tag and libby have daughters and a niece.  the niece is the reason lindsey was missing school because of problems with the niece.  the day before lindsey and the niece were friends again so lindsey was over there the day before and the day she went missing. 

libby is the one who works at the bee hive place down the street. 

___________________

now here is the local rumor mill stories...

at first someone stated that lindsey had stopped by tag and libby's on the way home and a white car drove by and lindsey turned white and was scared to death and asked to spend the night and tag and libby told her no...

Then after this local talked with marilyn the story changed.. marilyn said she was good friends with tag and libby and they would never do that, and that is what happened at Kara's house, not at tag and libby's house.  Marilyn now says that lindsey headed straight for home and stopped nowhere and that lindsey does not know anyone on that street. 

this is an out and out lie from marilyn.  Not only does she say this happened at karas not libby's she says lindsey did not know anyone on that street.  she's a liar. she knows full well lindsey knows tag and libby, and she also has no idea if lindsey walked straight home without stopping or not....or... does she know?  how would she know, she has not lived in that town for months.  How does she know who lindsey knows or where she goes?  is she in contact with her after she moved to another town? 

I have to be honest, I am getting tired of trying to explain this stuff to have people snip pieces out and make it say something I did not post and use it to prove the exact opposite of what I say... and I don't have the time to come and correct it everytime somone does this.  and I see it being done over and over and over... and it is confusing people. 

so I don't know how to keep this straight when people keep doing this. 

marilyn is the one who changed the story and put this off on kara.  another local says she stopped at tag and libby's house and asked to spend the night.  I don't know if she did or not, but someone might want to go find out. 

every time there is any info come and then someone runs it past marilyn, the story changes.  that is all I know.  if marilyn would get her butt out here and explain this stuff instead of posting crap on some comment on the news article then run off and manipulate other people to keep her lies going, maybe someone might get to the bottom of this mess.  but see it's lies...

there are people in mccleary and elma who know things, but they are not going to say, and when they do, it changes after marilyn hears about it. 

so... the people who live there better realize they have an underground element they obviously are not seeing.  but if they don't wish to know that be it from me to keep telling them.  I'm tired of saying this stuff over and over only to have my words twisted to say the opposite.  and I am not going to keep correcting it everytime someone does it. 



and I really would like to know who this roger is with the broken rib who shortcake knows about.  I find that REALLY interesting.  Because we know who roger is, but I don't think anyone else knows who he is.  In fact I KNOW no one else knows who he is... the only other person who could know who roger is, is marilyn or someone she has told.  that is a FACT.  so until I figure out how shortcake knows about roger with the broken rib, I am not saying who it is.  ...LOL





Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3 7/28/09 -
Post by: Leroy on August 10, 2009, 08:41:58 PM
DD - the other day you mentioned you were going to call Marilyn...just wondering if you have talked to her personally?


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3 7/28/09 -
Post by: KarmaRoundUp on August 10, 2009, 08:42:21 PM
Thanks so the pool house is Libby's house, so did Lindsey go there after Kara's house to see if she could sleep over, or is that something Marilyn is making up?
Dang it,Sorry NoRose,forgot to answer your questions.
I am thinking that Lindsey did not want to go home that night because of the fight with Josh and I am believing that she did stop at someone's house to see if she could stay the night.Could be the pool house where she stopped.

Also,IF Lindsey stopped at someone's house to see if she could stay the night,why would this person not report that sighting to LE?
I'll tell you why.They have things they are hiding from LE.
The people in this house sure could have something to hide. But that fight with Josh seemed like it was a normal brother and sister fight, so I can't understand why she maybe didn't want to go home?
The fight probably looks normal to us but to a little girl(who may have felt threatened by her older and much bigger brother)it may have been scary.I used to be scared to death of my older brother but he was a bully.I don't know if Josh is/was.She might have felt extra scared because of the way her and Kayla teased Josh on the way to Kayla's house(safty in numbers).
That could be, it could have been a worse fight then we are being told, I don't have any siblings so I was just assuming it was just a normal spat.  ::MonkeyConfused::
I'm thinking it was just a normal spat but may have been scarier than usual for Lindsey.Lindsey and Kayla could have really been dogging Josh out and maybe Lindsey thought Josh would pay her back when she came home and maybe she thought she was in big trouble with her Mama.On one of the media interviews someone,either Kara or Melissa said"just come home Lindsey,you're not in trouble".


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3 7/28/09 -
Post by: pink angel on August 10, 2009, 08:42:36 PM
Regarding ML. There is nothing that she has said, that can be proven. It's all rumor. Where is her facts? Where is her proof?

I think she is full of BS myself. She obviously has a beef with Lindsey's mom and Josh and will say anything possible to discredit them. This alone is her self-serving motive, PAYBACK. Her son has been in fights with Josh. Wanna bet she also thought MB was the one who called animal control on her regarding her dogs? I think she's a vindictive crazy neighbor is all.

When it comes to a missing child or a crime and you have information or personal knowledge regarding a family or family issues, that may be useful to helping find her or may be useful in regards to the investigation, you go to police with your information, you don't go posting in on a comment section of a newspaper or you don't post it on a forum.

The police have said that Melissa Baum has passed a lie detector and they said they ruled all family members out as suspects. They rarely do this publicly. They rarely talk about if people pass lie detector tests and they rarely clear family members publicly.  They look at family first thing and they look at them HARD. FBI was involved at this time too.

When asked "are family members suspect". Police usually always answer "EVERYONE IS A SUSPECT". They rarely RULE OUT family members to the public. They did that here. To me that says they are confident that Melissa or Josh had no involvement in Lindsey becoming a missing person.   jmo


Quote
Police have ruled out all family members as suspects.
http://www.king5.com/localnews/stories/NW_063009WAB-Mccleary-girl-search-LJ.1fc0b759.html


pink angel

I cannot find where ALL family members have been ruled out as suspects in the link you provided.

In the following article Melissa Baum and Scott Williams appear to be ruled out as persons of interest.

Janet

+++++++


KOMO News – July 2, 2009

The missing girl's mother, who wanted avoid becoming the center of the investigation, voluntarily took a polygraph test. The father of the girl's best friend, Scott Williams, also volunteered to take the test.

"At their requests polygraphs were given to them. They passed those polygraphs. We're comfortable with the information they've shared with us and comfortable with the timeline they've explained," said Grays Harbor County Undersheriff Rick Scott.

http://www.komonews.com/news/49651607.html


KING 5 News - June 30, 2009

Baum says she volunteered to take a polygraph late today. She wanted to clear herself, although police tell us she is not a suspect.

"I don't want people saying oh maybe the mom got mad at her and stashed her and now saying she ran away, I don't want anything like that," says Baum. "I want everyone to know my daughter is missing."

http://www.king5.com/localnews/stories/NW_063009WAB-Mccleary-girl-search-LJ.1fc0b759.html
 








That article was updated. It's not there but it's also in this article:
Police have ruled out all family members as suspects.

http://www.king5.com/topstories/stories/NW_062909WAB-Mccleary-girl-missing-LJ.1a971644.html


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3 7/28/09 -
Post by: no rose colored glasses on August 10, 2009, 08:42:45 PM
Thank-you DD, is it fair to say that Marilyn has somekind of hold on some of the towns people that they aren't willing to talk? Maybe she threatens people?


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3 7/28/09 -
Post by: KarmaRoundUp on August 10, 2009, 08:45:21 PM
KARA KAMPEN - SWIMMING

KaraK
Re: Lindsey Baum, 10y missing from McCleary, WA 6/26/09
« Reply #1578 on: July 07, 2009, 10:37:19 PM »


I'm going to try and catch up I know that I missed some questions but there will be a delay - we have to meet friends at the park who will be releasing some B-day balloons for Lindsey.

The girls were swimming at the same home both days. At the time the girls were there it was 2 to 3 other girls (9 to 12), Lindsey, my daughter and the mother of one of the other girls (the mother to the child whose house they were at). - Hope that makes sense.

As for the argument: according to my daughter right now: it started at Shell station (this is where they left the bike) then they continued walking til they were on Maple (I know this was confused earlier possibly because I didn't understand what Kayla was saying) they were several houses down from mine when the family friend (who apparently was visiting a another friend on this street) told Josh to go home.    - Does that make sense? If not I'll try to make it clearer but I got to run but will come back and try to catch up on any ?'s.

http://scaredmonkeys.net/index.php?topic=5541.msg868953#msg868953
Thank you Janet!
I completely missed that they swan there 2 days.


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3 7/28/09 -
Post by: doubledecker on August 10, 2009, 08:45:45 PM
well now I have read shortcakes post about roger

saying she was sitting in a local bar and roger came in and she overheard about his broken rib. 

hmmm..

which bar was this at?  what did roger look like?


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3 7/28/09 -
Post by: doubledecker on August 10, 2009, 08:47:03 PM
Thank-you DD, is it fair to say that Marilyn has somekind of hold on some of the towns people that they aren't willing to talk? Maybe she threatens people?
'

I don't know but she assaulted someone last summmer... court docs prove that.


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3 7/28/09 -
Post by: doubledecker on August 10, 2009, 08:50:04 PM
DD - the other day you mentioned you were going to call Marilyn...just wondering if you have talked to her personally?

I was going to get an addy for her she was giving someone to give me, but I ended up telling them she was a huge liar LOL so after that I haven't heard from the person again... or at least I haven't heard from them through email.  LOL


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3 7/28/09 -
Post by: love4ever on August 10, 2009, 08:51:37 PM
Thank-you DD, is it fair to say that Marilyn has somekind of hold on some of the towns people that they aren't willing to talk? Maybe she threatens people?
'

I don't know but she assaulted someone last summmer... court docs prove that.

Ummm DD, what happened to your research site??..I need it..lol


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3 7/28/09 -
Post by: doubledecker on August 10, 2009, 08:52:25 PM
is it just me, or is the wind blowing? 


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3 7/28/09 -
Post by: no rose colored glasses on August 10, 2009, 08:52:53 PM
Thank-you DD, is it fair to say that Marilyn has somekind of hold on some of the towns people that they aren't willing to talk? Maybe she threatens people?
'

I don't know but she assaulted someone last summmer... court docs prove that.
My observations she looks like a bully and more.


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3 7/28/09 -
Post by: doubledecker on August 10, 2009, 08:53:51 PM
Thank-you DD, is it fair to say that Marilyn has somekind of hold on some of the towns people that they aren't willing to talk? Maybe she threatens people?
'

I don't know but she assaulted someone last summmer... court docs prove that.

Ummm DD, what happened to your research site??..I need it..lol

its in maintenance mode at the moment so I can fix some settings and I am having a hard time figuring it out... but it will be back up in a few.  don't worry, it will be back up LOL   I'm not THAT aggrivated ... YET   ::MonkeyCool::


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3 7/28/09 -
Post by: doubledecker on August 10, 2009, 08:55:25 PM
its up love, I will fix it later. 


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3 7/28/09 -
Post by: KarmaRoundUp on August 10, 2009, 08:55:58 PM
Good night you all,have a good one.
DD,I hope all of our talk about the pool house is not what is causing your aggravation.
We need a monkey in the pool icon.


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3 7/28/09 -
Post by: doubledecker on August 10, 2009, 08:57:29 PM
1 Lachester, Marilyn
Defendant Grays Harbor Dist #2 Y5-2-1884 10-21-2005
2 Lachester, Marilyn
Defendant G H Co Superior 09-2-00229-7 02-19-2009
3 Lachester, Marilyn A
Defendant Grays Harbor Dist #2 Y6-2-0254 02-22-2006
4 Lachester, Marilyn A
Defendant Grays Harbor Dist #2 Y6-2-0281 02-24-2006
5 Lachester, Marilyn A
Defendant G H Co Superior 08-2-00961-7 07-21-2008
6 Lachester, Marilyn A
Judgment Debtor G H Co Superior 08-9-20647-7 07-21-2008
7 Lachester, Marilyn Audrey
Defendant Mccleary Municipal I00012272 02-07-2007
8 Lachester, Marilyn Audrey
Defendant Mccleary Municipal C00001844 06-04-2007
9 Lachester, Marilyn Audrey
Defendant Mccleary Municipal C00002001 06-30-2008
10 Lachester, Marilyn Audrey
Respondent Grays Harbor Dist #2 Y7-2-2563 11-20-2007


Lachester, Festus
Defendant Grays Harbor Dist #2 Y6-2-0281 02-24-2006
2 Lachester, Festus
Defendant Clallam County #2 6872089 02-08-1992
3 Lachester, Festus
Defendant Grays Harbor Dist #2 Y5-2-1885 10-21-2005
4 Lachester, Festus
Defendant Grays Harbor Dist #2 Y7-2-1445 07-02-2007
5 Lachester, Festus Iv
Defendant Mccleary Municipal C00001743 02-13-2006
6 Lachester, Festus Iv
Defendant Mccleary Municipal C00001773 04-13-2006
7 Lachester, Festus Iv
Defendant Mccleary Municipal I00012577 04-13-2006
8 Lachester, Festus Iv
Defendant Cosmopolis Municipal I00082698 02-07-2006
9 Lachester, Festus Iv
Defendant Kitsap District Y33499329 03-10-2003
10 Lachester, Festus Iii
Defendant Grays Harbor Dist #1 Y0-1-0057 01-06-2000
11 Lachester, Festus Iii
Defendant G H Co Superior 09-2-00229-7 02-19-2009
12 Lachester, Festus Iv
Defendant Mccleary Municipal C00002018 11-10-2008
13 Lachester, Festus Iv
Defendant Mccleary Municipal I00013072 11-10-2008
14 Lachester, Festus Iv
Defendant Kitsap Superior 01-2-02553-0 09-07-2001
15 Lachester, Festus Iv
Judgment Debtor Kitsap Superior 01-9-03317-1 09-14-2001
16 Lachester, Festus Iv
Judgment Debtor G H Co Superior 99-9-00709-5 04-27-1999
17 Lachester, Festus T
Defendant Kitsap District Y2-004097 10-16-2002



Superior Court Case Summary


Court: G H Co Superior
Case Number: 09-2-00229-7

Sub Docket Date Docket Code Docket Description Misc Info
6 02-13-2009 AFSR
DEF0001 Affidavit/dclr/cert Of Service
Lachester, Festus Iii
02-13-2009 AFP Affidavit Of Posting
- 02-19-2009 $FFR Filing Fee Received 45.00
- 02-19-2009 CICS Case Information Cover Sheet
1 02-19-2009 CMP Complaint
2 02-19-2009 SM Summons
3 02-19-2009 MTAF Motion And Affidavit/declaration
4 02-19-2009 ORWRST
JDG0002 Order For Writ Of Restitution
Judge David Edwards
5 02-19-2009 $WRRI Writ Of Restitution Issued 20.00


Superior Court Case Summary


Court: Kitsap Superior
Case Number: 01-9-03317-1

Sub Docket Date Docket Code Docket Description Misc Info
09-14-2001 JD
Judgment & Order For Writ In Favor Of Lance
Aubry Against Festus Lachester Iv
Principal
Plus Daily Rent Of $15.00 From 10-01-2001
Until Date Of Vacate
Attorney Fees
Costs
Interest @ 12% Per Annum



Superior Court Case Summary


Court: G H Co Superior
Case Number: 99-9-00709-5

Sub Docket Date Docket Code Docket Description Misc Info
04-27-1999 JDODS Jdgmnt & Ord Deferring Sntnc/adjud
04-27-1999 $CA Costs Assessed 5.00
04-27-1999 $PACV Penalty Assessed - Crime Victims 100.00


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3 7/28/09 -
Post by: Tamikosmom on August 10, 2009, 08:57:31 PM
Thank you pink angel.

I never realized that family members had been ruled out as suspects.

Janet

+++++++

KING 5 News – June 29, 2009

Lindsey's father lives in Tennessee. He's been in touch with police and is not considered a suspect.

Police have ruled out all family members as suspects.

http://www.king5.com/topstories/stories/NW_062909WAB-Mccleary-girl-missing-LJ.1a971644.html


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3 7/28/09 -
Post by: doubledecker on August 10, 2009, 08:57:56 PM
you want to believe these people are credible... go ahead


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3 7/28/09 -
Post by: doubledecker on August 10, 2009, 08:58:37 PM
what was it she said,  she had only been to court for her dog being lose...

wow, are these all dog lose cases? 


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3 7/28/09 -
Post by: love4ever on August 10, 2009, 08:59:14 PM
its up love, I will fix it later. 


Thank you!!!!!!!!!!!


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3 7/28/09 -
Post by: love4ever on August 10, 2009, 09:01:22 PM
you want to believe these people are credible... go ahead


too Bad we coan't list the Marilyn Burns court docs, dangit ::MonkeyTease::


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3 7/28/09 -
Post by: no rose colored glasses on August 10, 2009, 09:01:45 PM
you want to believe these people are credible... go ahead
After what you just posted and I saw all the trouble they have had with the law, I sure don't see them as credible. The only thing I'm trying to figure out is why Marilyn is inserting herself in this when she doesn't even live in the town anymore except to cause trouble, and she isn't mentally right.


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3 7/28/09 -
Post by: doubledecker on August 10, 2009, 09:02:06 PM
Good night you all,have a good one.
DD,I hope all of our talk about the pool house is not what is causing your aggravation.
We need a monkey in the pool icon.

no, not at all... sorry I made you feel that way... what aggrivates me is when I post something marilyn LIED about and say she lied, and someone will snip the LIED part off and post it as if I said marilyn said it and it is true. 


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3 7/28/09 -
Post by: doubledecker on August 10, 2009, 09:03:47 PM
you want to believe these people are credible... go ahead


too Bad we coan't list the Marilyn Burns court docs, dangit ::MonkeyTease::

oh that is only one county there... what about fresno in cali...


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3 7/28/09 -
Post by: no rose colored glasses on August 10, 2009, 09:04:38 PM
what was it she said,  she had only been to court for her dog being lose...

wow, are these all dog lose cases? 
She has one wild dog if that is the case  ::MonkeyRoll::


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3 7/28/09 -
Post by: Tamikosmom on August 10, 2009, 09:05:05 PM
KARA KAMPEN - SWIMMING

KaraK
Re: Lindsey Baum, 10y missing from McCleary, WA 6/26/09
« Reply #1578 on: July 07, 2009, 10:37:19 PM »


I'm going to try and catch up I know that I missed some questions but there will be a delay - we have to meet friends at the park who will be releasing some B-day balloons for Lindsey.

The girls were swimming at the same home both days. At the time the girls were there it was 2 to 3 other girls (9 to 12), Lindsey, my daughter and the mother of one of the other girls (the mother to the child whose house they were at). - Hope that makes sense.

As for the argument: according to my daughter right now: it started at Shell station (this is where they left the bike) then they continued walking til they were on Maple (I know this was confused earlier possibly because I didn't understand what Kayla was saying) they were several houses down from mine when the family friend (who apparently was visiting a another friend on this street) told Josh to go home.    - Does that make sense? If not I'll try to make it clearer but I got to run but will come back and try to catch up on any ?'s.

http://scaredmonkeys.net/index.php?topic=5541.msg868953#msg868953
Thank you Janet!
I completely missed that they swan there 2 days.


You are welcome Grandma Karma..

I heard through the Monkey grapevine.

 ::MonkeyJnBox::

CONGRATULATIONS!!.

Janet


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3 7/28/09 -
Post by: doubledecker on August 10, 2009, 09:06:18 PM
you want to believe these people are credible... go ahead
After what you just posted and I saw all the trouble they have had with the law, I sure don't see them as credible. The only thing I'm trying to figure out is why Marilyn is inserting herself in this when she doesn't even live in the town anymore except to cause trouble, and she isn't mentally right.

this is the whole point... the WHY???   and the other point is, she is causing people to not help search for lindsey.  the search center was actually pulled... why?   because  "it is better not to get involved"  What does that tell you.   why would someone feel that they should not let them use the building because "it is better not to get involved" 

why would anyone even make that statement about searching for a missing child


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3 7/28/09 -
Post by: no rose colored glasses on August 10, 2009, 09:06:36 PM
you want to believe these people are credible... go ahead


too Bad we coan't list the Marilyn Burns court docs, dangit ::MonkeyTease::

oh that is only one county there... what about fresno in cali...
Oh great, I don't even want to say my impression of the lovely couple, it certainly wouldn't be too kind  ::MonkeyRoll::  Let's just say I would be afraid to cross either one of them.


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3 7/28/09 -
Post by: no rose colored glasses on August 10, 2009, 09:08:57 PM
you want to believe these people are credible... go ahead
After what you just posted and I saw all the trouble they have had with the law, I sure don't see them as credible. The only thing I'm trying to figure out is why Marilyn is inserting herself in this when she doesn't even live in the town anymore except to cause trouble, and she isn't mentally right.

this is the whole point... the WHY???   and the other point is, she is causing people to not help search for lindsey.  the search center was actually pulled... why?   because  "it is better not to get involved"  What does that tell you.   why would someone feel that they should not let them use the building because "it is better not to get involved" 

why would anyone even make that statement about searching for a missing child
Million dollar question, but I'm sure it will all come out, problem is when, and what happened to this child?


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3 7/28/09 -
Post by: love4ever on August 10, 2009, 09:10:16 PM
you want to believe these people are credible... go ahead


too Bad we coan't list the Marilyn Burns court docs, dangit ::MonkeyTease::

oh that is only one county there... what about fresno in cali...
Oh great, I don't even want to say my impression of the lovely couple, it certainly wouldn't be too kind  ::MonkeyRoll::  Let's just say I would be afraid to cross either one of them.

Let's hope they didn't make MBaum feel that way as a SINGLE MOTHER, and for the sake of LINDSEY


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3 7/28/09 -
Post by: sunshine12 on August 10, 2009, 09:10:17 PM
shortcake-if you have any credible information on this roger character please post it or email klaas or dd.



Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3 7/28/09 -
Post by: love4ever on August 10, 2009, 09:12:19 PM
shortcake-if you have any credible information on this roger character please post it or email klaas or dd.



I am sure since Mlachester is so credible ::MonkeyMad::, shewould have already told the LE or FbI about this name ROGER, wouldn't ya think?


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3 7/28/09 -
Post by: shortcake on August 10, 2009, 09:14:04 PM
well now I have read shortcakes post about roger

saying she was sitting in a local bar and roger came in and she overheard about his broken rib. 

hmmm..

which bar was this at?  what did roger look like?

There is really only one bar in this town.  Do you know what he looks like?  Do you have a picture?  I believe from your posts this the same one you are looking at.  Let me say it again.  I think it may be a runnung down a rabbit trail that will lead to nowhere.  Like I said, if someone has any information that is valid, then it should be reported to the police, but not just rumor.  Can you get Marilyn to fess up who she is talking to?  I do not know this Marilyn.  Next time I travel down there I will try and see this tag's place.  It does not look familiar. 


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3 7/28/09 -
Post by: no rose colored glasses on August 10, 2009, 09:14:41 PM
you want to believe these people are credible... go ahead


too Bad we coan't list the Marilyn Burns court docs, dangit ::MonkeyTease::

oh that is only one county there... what about fresno in cali...
Oh great, I don't even want to say my impression of the lovely couple, it certainly wouldn't be too kind  ::MonkeyRoll::  Let's just say I would be afraid to cross either one of them.

Let's hope they didn't make MBaum feel that way as a SINGLE MOTHER, and for the sake of LINDSEY
I hope they didn't, but......


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3 7/28/09 -
Post by: Leroy on August 10, 2009, 09:14:44 PM
other than from ML, is there another factual source that LE and CPS failed to do their jobs? And I am not being condescending . . . what factual source, like a report file, 911 tapes are in the public domain, file number, case number, case worker or source other than speculation.  This sure would help in the research.  I'm simply not finding it in any research.  In fact, what I am finding is not looking good for ML, but I won't put it out until it can be substantiated by one more factual source.
I can't wait to read all of this, because I also was believing Marilyn until I really looked into her eyes and saw craziness, nothing scientific just an observation.

no rose colored glasses

I would love to look into Marilyn's eyes.  Would you or another Monkey please provide a link.

Thank you.

Janet

Janet - there are pics of her on her Myspace page...let me go find the link for ya.


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3 7/28/09 -
Post by: sunshine12 on August 10, 2009, 09:16:10 PM
shortcake-if you have any credible information on this roger character please post it or email klaas or dd.



I am sure since Mlachester is so credible ::MonkeyMad::, shewould have already told the LE or FbI about this name ROGER, wouldn't ya think?

i would hope so! i would also hope that if shortcake has first hand knowledge of roger she would also call and inform the le or fbi that this person has a physical injury, which could be of importance in a missing child case


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3 7/28/09 -
Post by: doubledecker on August 10, 2009, 09:17:23 PM
you want to believe these people are credible... go ahead


too Bad we coan't list the Marilyn Burns court docs, dangit ::MonkeyTease::

oh that is only one county there... what about fresno in cali...
Oh great, I don't even want to say my impression of the lovely couple, it certainly wouldn't be too kind  ::MonkeyRoll::  Let's just say I would be afraid to cross either one of them.

oh they look mild compared to some of their friends


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3 7/28/09 -
Post by: love4ever on August 10, 2009, 09:17:44 PM
hmmm I was really wondering if you can see tag's from the bar, if you are reading can you let me know
What do you mean by tag's? I am not familiar with this.  I do know you look directly up 4th street from the front of the bar which is located on W. Simpson Ave.  Maple Street runs parallel to W Simpson Ave.  Mike's across the street from Gordon's recently closed.  I am familiar with the area and have spent a few weeks trying to catch up with past posts.  Sounds like Marilyn has some information, but I don't know if all of it is good. 
 ::MonkeyConfused::  I do know of a Roger that had a broken rib.  Could it be the same one?  Sounds like it.  I have no information about him so enough said.  Shortcake   

Tag is a person.  Guess you don't know who they are.  Sorry.  Figured if you were from there you would know them.  And you mentioned the bar and people sitting out there and he goes there. 

anyway, oh we know who roger is.  Interesting that you know who he is also and that he has a broken rib.  You must know marilyn quite well. ::MonkeyWink::

Thanks for clearing up tag's.  I do not know them.  I am familiar with the area, but I am not a local.  I am familiar with a Roger who broke a rib, but no knowledge of how or exactly where it happened.  I just know it was not too long ago.  I do not know where he lives, but I do not believe he drives.  I think he may be red herring.  I do not know a Marilyn.  If someone local is feeding her information about the case, she needs to get them to report it.  Let the LE filter through it.  One thing I noticed is after Lindsey's disappearence, locals became standoffish and made me feel not welcome being an outsider.  I think this is normal after such a incident.  I also don't believe locals had any fear of being out late.  After all this is a small town and nothing ever happens there.  Now I notice mothers holding on to thier kids walking down the street.  That town has changed.   ::MonkeyWaa::

shortcake- if someone who doesnt even live in the town, as you have stated you do not live in mccleary, knows that this roger person broke a rib, how do you know this? where did you hear this from? i am just wondering... have you been in town a lot since her disappearance to know that the locals have become standoffish,  how are you so familiar with the area?  have you been there a lot recently that you would notice the mothers holding on to their kids walking down the street?

I was there one day when a Roger walked in the local bar and I heard someone mention it.  I don't even remember exactly when it was.  I don know if this is the same person mentioned here.  I have been in town a few times before and after, Bear Festiful and all. It was not a happy occasion.  I don't want to share with you everything about me, I don't want to be shunned more.  I feel like you are examining me and don't know why.  I want Lindsey found like everyone else.  I drove through there recently and of course some things I notice, maybe it is just me.  I don't know why I decided to post, but I have a connection with the area. The first time I drove through the town after Lindsey's dissapearance, they were handing out flyers.  I almost broke down in tears.  I is so sad. ::MonkeyMad::


Maybe since you were there and you heard his name and about his rib, you should call and tell?


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3 7/28/09 -
Post by: no rose colored glasses on August 10, 2009, 09:18:27 PM
you want to believe these people are credible... go ahead


too Bad we coan't list the Marilyn Burns court docs, dangit ::MonkeyTease::

oh that is only one county there... what about fresno in cali...
Oh great, I don't even want to say my impression of the lovely couple, it certainly wouldn't be too kind  ::MonkeyRoll::  Let's just say I would be afraid to cross either one of them.

oh they look mild compared to some of their friends

Can just imagine.


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3 7/28/09 -
Post by: doubledecker on August 10, 2009, 09:19:04 PM
well now I have read shortcakes post about roger

saying she was sitting in a local bar and roger came in and she overheard about his broken rib. 

hmmm..

which bar was this at?  what did roger look like?

There is really only one bar in this town.  Do you know what he looks like?  Do you have a picture?  I believe from your posts this the same one you are looking at.  Let me say it again.  I think it may be a runnung down a rabbit trail that will lead to nowhere.  Like I said, if someone has any information that is valid, then it should be reported to the police, but not just rumor.  Can you get Marilyn to fess up who she is talking to?  I do not know this Marilyn.  Next time I travel down there I will try and see this tag's place.  It does not look familiar. 


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3 7/28/09 -
Post by: love4ever on August 10, 2009, 09:20:07 PM
shortcake-if you have any credible information on this roger character please post it or email klaas or dd.



I am sure since Mlachester is so credible ::MonkeyMad::, shewould have already told the LE or FbI about this name ROGER, wouldn't ya think?

i would hope so! i would also hope that if shortcake has first hand knowledge of roger she would also call and inform the le or fbi that this person has a physical injury, which could be of importance in a missing child case

DITTO


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3 7/28/09 -
Post by: Tamikosmom on August 10, 2009, 09:20:19 PM
“I will find my daughter”
BY JACOB JONES - The Daily World
Sunday, August 2, 2009 1:14 AM PDT


Power lines hang low over the narrow, gravel-lined stretch of asphalt in McCleary called Maple Street.

Cars roll past rows of small houses. Sprinklers spin in the front yards. Shrubs and street lights stand on either side of the road.

From the front step of her nearby home, Melissa Baum can almost see its intersection with Fifth Street where her 11-year-old daughter took her last known steps into oblivion.

“I feel like she’s right under my nose and I can’t find her,” she said.

Baum sat on her front step earlier this week, staring eastward toward Maple Street with the faint plinking of wind chimes behind her. She lit a cigarette.

“It’s really frustrating,” she said.

The family dog, Cadence, curled up on the concrete at her feet. Signs of support hung in the windows. Empty Diet Coke cans and fountain drinks sat stacked beside her chair after hours of waiting and watching the end of the road.

“It was all a fluke that whole night,” Baum explained quietly. “It’s like everything fell into place. The one time she left the house without her cell phone. The one time she started walking home alone.”
 
A prayer candle with an image of the Virgin Mary rested among the cups and cigarette butts.

“That wasn’t a usual night,” she said. “It was a very unusual night and very unusual circumstances.”

DISAPPEARANCE

Lindsey Baum, an outgoing 4-foot-9 Girl Scout with shoulder-length brown hair, started walking home from her friend’s house shortly after 9 p.m. on June 26. She was 10 years old, just 11 days shy of her birthday.

Lindsey set out alone after an argument with her brother. Her cell phone battery had died earlier in the day and she left it behind. She wore a light-blue, hooded pullover shirt and blue jeans. The sun still burned low on the horizon as she started the short walk home.

A couple neighbors spotted her approaching 5th Street, but she never made it to her front door.

In the first frantic days of searching, hundreds of detectives, volunteers, search dogs, reporters and neighbors descended upon the rural crossroads. Thousands of new footprints scattered Lindsey’s last known steps.

They flooded the streets of the small East County town of about 1,500. They knocked on doors. They stomped through bushes and flew search planes over the nearby woods. Their dogs hunted for Lindsey’s scent. Television news vans transmitted her picture to screens across the country.

For weeks, volunteers in orange vests passed out fliers with Lindsey’s photo. Officers from nearby law enforcement agencies came into town to help. Neighbors held candlelight vigils in the city’s park to comfort each other and hold off despair.

Cable news programs, Nancy Grace from CNN and other shows, picked up on the mystery. Lindsey’s father flew in from Tennessee to help investigators. Lindsey’s photo turned up on bulletin boards from Ocean Shores to Olympia.

 For all of the hoping and searching, investigators could not find any evidence explaining what happened to Lindsey.

Local detectives and Federal Bureau of Investigation agents eventually moved from leading search teams through bushes to establishing a “war room” in Montesano for a long-term search. They assigned a task force of core detectives to the case full-time and worked through weekends and holidays.

Grays Harbor Undersheriff Rick Scott said at times he forced investigators to go home as their determination to find Lindsey battled with their mounting frustration.

“They’ve put in a solid month on this case,” he said recently, “and they’re working as hard as they were when we first started.”

But as the weeks have stretched, many of the search teams went home, taking their planes, dogs and orange vests. Lindsey’s 11th birthday passed without word of her fate. Lindsey’s father returned to Tennessee. McCleary businesses who changed their reader boards to signs of support have changed them back to the daily specials.

The shadow of the unknown remains, filling the streets like the droning hum of the Simpson mill.

“It’s affected all of us,” Baum said. “It’s affected the whole community.”

With one hand reaching down to pet Cadence, she scanned the empty afternoon streets. Lindsey’s disappearance has shaken the small town. She said the groups of playing children vanished with her daughter.

“The streets are quiet,” she said, “almost deserted now compared to what they were a month ago.”

INVESTIGATION

Grays Harbor Sheriff’s Detective Polly Davin now spends most of her time about 16 miles away in a small Montesano office, filled with files, in-boxes and phones. A couple computers hum on the desktop.

The office has served as the “war room” for the investigation since the Sheriff Office’s mobile command center pulled out of McCleary.

“It’s not anything special,” she said, “but it does the job.”

Davin shares the office with a handful of sheriff’s detectives and FBI agents still dedicated to the case full-time. Other investigators come and go as necessary.

“This is my world,” she said. “I am assigned exclusively to this case.”

In the past five weeks, the investigators have questioned hundreds of people, collected thousands of tips and built a computer database of information that they hope will point them to Lindsey.

Short summary paragraphs of every tip are catalogued in 5-inch-thick binders. Davin said they just started their fifth binder.

“You get so much information on a daily basis,” she said.

Undersheriff Scott said the investigation has produced an abundance of clues, but almost no evidence. Thousands of tips have been called or sent in, but they lead in a thousand different directions, few any more likely than the others.

Investigators considered all possibilities from lost to run-away to abducted at first. As the days passed, they quickly began to fear Lindsey had been taken. They worked longer hours and re-canvased areas of town.

“You can’t work, eat and sleep one situation like this and not become obsessed about it,” Scott said.

Sheriff Mike Whelan agreed that the detectives have given everything they can to the investigation.

“Our detectives are going out there and talking to the family over and over again,” he said. “They do this so much that they get an idea of what this child is like. ... It’s almost like they knew the child even though they have never seen her before.”

Whelan said he has authorized long hours of overtime and extra resources for the case despite the department’s current budget issues.

“I don’t know what it’s cost us,” he said. “It’s cost us an awful lot, but we’re going to spend whatever it takes.”

Scott said it has been difficult to balance staff levels dedicated to the case while making sure other everyday crimes and previous cases are not neglected. He said no other cases will be ignored, but they will have to be prioritized.

“There isn’t a single detective on this case that was sitting around with nothing to do,” he said. “They all had big case loads, so we’ve had to dole that out.”

Scott said the detectives now practice a “routine” of collecting and prioritizing new tips and assigning investigators to check them out daily. The methodical approach is meant to single out valuable information, but it often ends in false leads and little reward at first.

“Every time you think you’re onto something that’s going to be viable, you hit a brick wall,” he said. “It fizzles out. Then you have to regroup and take the next task you’ve been assigned, the next tip and hope that it’s the one. And you have to go at it with the same energy.”

Davin said she is responsible for coordinating incoming information and helping sort through the daily assignments. She feels encouraged by the support from other law enforcement agencies and the investigative experience many have brought to the case.

The core investigators — Davin, Keith Peterson and Ed McGowan — have a good balance of temperaments and perspectives. They will often sit over meals and try to sort through different aspects of the case as a group.

“We talk,” she said. “We sit as a team and we talk.”

Having worked more than 10 days straight at the beginning of the search, Davin said the case has definitely taken a toll on some of the detectives. They are trying to make sure each other get enough time off so they can recharge and come back with fresh insights.

“It’s probably hard to focus at home,” she admitted.

The lost leads and dead-ends also weigh on the investigators, she said, but they know one small piece of information could turn things around quickly.

“We haven’t given up,” she said.

Despite the setbacks, Scott said the case remains the office’s highest priority. Investigators will do whatever is necessary to bring Lindsey back to her family.

“The hell that we’re going to can’t compare to theirs.”

WAITING

Melissa Baum said the anxiety hits her at night when the air quiets and she runs out of tasks to keep herself distracted.

“I cry myself to sleep begging and praying for the Lord to lead me to my daughter,” she said. “Every night I lay down with the hope that it will be tonight that they come pounding on my door at 3 a.m. and hand her to me, but every night it gets harder and harder.”

She sleeps with a copy of “Harry Potter and the Chamber of Secrets” next to her on the nightstand. The book hasn’t moved since Lindsey disappeared.

“Lindsey and I were sort of taking turns reading aloud to each other,” she said. “I haven’t touched the book. It’s still on my nightstand. I haven’t touched it.”

Baum said she and her 12-year-old son, Josh, will sit down at night to watch a movie and feel overwhelmed by Lindsey’s absence.

During the first two weeks, she almost never left home for fear she would miss a phone call. She now tries to stay busy throughout the day by posting fliers, often replacing old black-and-white versions with color posters. She talks to investigators and tries to make sure Josh has things to keep his mind occupied.

“He’s having a difficult time,” Baum said. “He’s angry. He misses his sister a lot. He’s wanting to go out and find whoever has her.”

When Baum runs out of things to do, sometimes she just gets in the car, which is plastered with fliers, and drives.

“I’ll just drive around for hours,” she said, “just drive around, hoping something will pull me toward her.”

Baum said the community support has been great. Her friends and family have collected donations to help her pay bills until she can return to work. But she says she still can’t focus on anything else.

She struggles with wondering how the investigation is going. She calls daily for updates on the case.

“I’m just at that point where I’m having a really difficult time sitting back and trusting them to do it,” she said. “I have tried really hard from the beginning to just stay out of their way.

“It’s getting hard.”

Baum said the worst part is knowing somebody holds the answer. Somebody, if they wanted to, could bring her daughter home at any moment.

“I can’t believe that nobody knows anything,” she said. “They just need to come forward. They need to re-evaluate their morality and put my little girl first.”

She said she knows Lindsey is alive and soon somebody will have the courage to lead investigators to her. She asked anyone with information to call the tip line at 1-866-915-8299.

“I just want her back,” she said. “You can stay anonymous, even calling a tip in. You don’t have to give your name or anything.”

After five weeks, yellow police tape still hangs over Lindsey’s door. Hand-written signs of support still hang in the windows of the house. Log trucks still slowly roll past Maple Street.

“She’s an 11-year-old little girl with her whole life ahead of her,” Baum said. “I will find her because I won’t stop. I’ll never stop. I will find my daughter.”

She lit a second cigarette and glanced eastward.

http://**/articles/2009/08/02/local_news/doc4a75285b085b5140001671.txt


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3 7/28/09 -
Post by: doubledecker on August 10, 2009, 09:20:39 PM
shortcake-if you have any credible information on this roger character please post it or email klaas or dd.



I am sure since Mlachester is so credible ::MonkeyMad::, shewould have already told the LE or FbI about this name ROGER, wouldn't ya think?

hmmm now that is a really good question... LOL


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3 7/28/09 -
Post by: doubledecker on August 10, 2009, 09:22:41 PM
well now I have read shortcakes post about roger

saying she was sitting in a local bar and roger came in and she overheard about his broken rib. 

hmmm..

which bar was this at?  what did roger look like?

There is really only one bar in this town.  Do you know what he looks like?  Do you have a picture?  I believe from your posts this the same one you are looking at.  Let me say it again.  I think it may be a runnung down a rabbit trail that will lead to nowhere.  Like I said, if someone has any information that is valid, then it should be reported to the police, but not just rumor.  Can you get Marilyn to fess up who she is talking to?  I do not know this Marilyn.  Next time I travel down there I will try and see this tag's place.  It does not look familiar. 

yes I know what he looks like, I have a photo of him. 


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3 7/28/09 -
Post by: Tamikosmom on August 10, 2009, 09:23:40 PM
other than from ML, is there another factual source that LE and CPS failed to do their jobs? And I am not being condescending . . . what factual source, like a report file, 911 tapes are in the public domain, file number, case number, case worker or source other than speculation.  This sure would help in the research.  I'm simply not finding it in any research.  In fact, what I am finding is not looking good for ML, but I won't put it out until it can be substantiated by one more factual source.
I can't wait to read all of this, because I also was believing Marilyn until I really looked into her eyes and saw craziness, nothing scientific just an observation.

no rose colored glasses

I would love to look into Marilyn's eyes.  Would you or another Monkey please provide a link.

Thank you.

Janet

Janet - there are pics of her on her Myspace page...let me go find the link for ya.

Thanks Leroy.

Janet


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3 7/28/09 -
Post by: doubledecker on August 10, 2009, 09:23:59 PM
shortcake-if you have any credible information on this roger character please post it or email klaas or dd.



I am sure since Mlachester is so credible ::MonkeyMad::, shewould have already told the LE or FbI about this name ROGER, wouldn't ya think?

i would hope so! i would also hope that if shortcake has first hand knowledge of roger she would also call and inform the le or fbi that this person has a physical injury, which could be of importance in a missing child case

good idea, since she actually saw him in the bar... she can id him for them.


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3 7/28/09 -
Post by: love4ever on August 10, 2009, 09:29:06 PM






I was there one day when a Roger walked in the local bar and I heard someone mention it.  I don't even remember exactly when it was.  I don know if this is the same person mentioned here.  I have been in town a few times before and after, Bear Festiful and all. It was not a happy occasion.  I don't want to share with you everything about me, I don't want to be shunned more.  I feel like you are examining me and don't know why.  I want Lindsey found like everyone else.  I drove through there recently and of course some things I notice, maybe it is just me.  I don't know why I decided to post, but I have a connection with the area. The first time I drove through the town after Lindsey's dissapearance, they were handing out flyers.  I almost broke down in tears.  I is so sad. ::MonkeyMad::


Maybe after this post she realized that maybe she needed to go to LE or FBI with here information, because she signed off of here


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3 7/28/09 -
Post by: no rose colored glasses on August 10, 2009, 09:29:13 PM
Do you think that Roger knows something about Lindsey, has some knowledge of what happened to her?


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3 7/28/09 -
Post by: doubledecker on August 10, 2009, 09:30:29 PM
wow, I get ragged to call the police but she wont and she actually saw the guy and heard about his rib 1st hand.  so why is she not telling?  hmmmm


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3 7/28/09 -
Post by: sunshine12 on August 10, 2009, 09:30:36 PM
what im wondering is if this roger person warrants any further investigation


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3 7/28/09 -
Post by: doubledecker on August 10, 2009, 09:31:21 PM
Do you think that Roger knows something about Lindsey, has some knowledge of what happened to her?

absolutely NOT


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3 7/28/09 -
Post by: doubledecker on August 10, 2009, 09:32:07 PM
what im wondering is if this roger person warrants any further investigation

absolutely NOT


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3 7/28/09 -
Post by: no rose colored glasses on August 10, 2009, 09:32:14 PM
wow, I get ragged to call the police but she wont and she actually saw the guy and heard about his rib 1st hand.  so why is she not telling?  hmmmm
Is she afraid of him and retaliation?


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3 7/28/09 -
Post by: no rose colored glasses on August 10, 2009, 09:33:29 PM
Do you think that Roger knows something about Lindsey, has some knowledge of what happened to her?

absolutely NOT
Thank-you 


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3 7/28/09 -
Post by: Sister on August 10, 2009, 09:33:48 PM
The article Janet posted seems to clearly outline how hard LE are working, doesn't sound too negligent to me.  What say you Janet, is the media the credible source to debunk ML and/or some of the court docs DD posted proving ML is a liar?
Prayers for Lindsey to come home!


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3 7/28/09 -
Post by: Leroy on August 10, 2009, 09:34:51 PM

Janet - there are pics of her on her Myspace page...let me go find the link for ya.

Here is Marilyns myspace

http://www.myspace.com/batchessqua


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3 7/28/09 -
Post by: sunshine12 on August 10, 2009, 09:34:55 PM
wow, I get ragged to call the police but she wont and she actually saw the guy and heard about his rib 1st hand.  so why is she not telling?  hmmmm
Is she afraid of him and retaliation?

maybe her initials are ML or she's friends with ML...either way, she feels as though we are "examining her and doesn't know why..."


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3 7/28/09 -
Post by: love4ever on August 10, 2009, 09:36:01 PM
Do you think that Roger knows something about Lindsey, has some knowledge of what happened to her?

You know the thing in researching all the people that are surrounded by Lindsey, we can not make claim that anyone knows what happened to Lindsey, what we can do is research these people Lindsey was surrounded by and see whose behavior/background would need to be further researched. Does that kinda make sense no rose colored glasses? I find some of the personalities researched to be very susceptible to criminal mischief/behaviors.


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3 7/28/09 -
Post by: sunshine12 on August 10, 2009, 09:36:57 PM
i am personally horrified that someone sent our kind-hearted posters on a wild goose chase about a man with a broken rib that may not even exist.


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3 7/28/09 -
Post by: doubledecker on August 10, 2009, 09:38:00 PM
you see it's a lie of marilyns  ... another huge lie... she says this guy lived with kara.  that he broke his rib crawling in her window that night because he lost his keys, and he goes to the bar all the time. and he is a cook at round house cafe. 

funny shortcake comes and confirms roger is in the bar with a broken rib.  wow she saw him and heard about his rib...

well after we chased this roger all over the place, we find out he is all made up.  another total lie by marilyn.  we find him alright... her oldest son's father who lives in fresno calif.

see what I mean.. .these are the people who have a trash campaign against kara and melissa and josh... so if people want to believe this crazy a$$ woman who is making up all this crap, oh well. 

she's a huge liar... the question is why.. why put this off on kara or melissa or josh.. why make up all these stories, why have other people who give info change their stories..

now you see why I get so annoyed about marilyn is credible etc.  its because we sit over here knowing it is all BS 

and this BS is hindering the search for lindsey.  and that is what makes me so mad.  I don't care if people want to be crazy, drink, do drugs, run amuck, whatever the heck they want to do , who cares, but when you do stuff to hinder finding a missing kid, that is when I get pissed off


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3 7/28/09 -
Post by: love4ever on August 10, 2009, 09:38:10 PM
Do you think that Roger knows something about Lindsey, has some knowledge of what happened to her?

You know the thing in researching all the people that are surrounded by Lindsey, we can not make claim that anyone knows what happened to Lindsey, what we can do is research these people Lindsey was surrounded by and see whose behavior/background would need to be further researched. Does that kinda make sense no rose colored glasses? I find some of the personalities researched to be very susceptible to criminal mischief/behaviors.


That is where I focus in research, if i keep digging and finding, I am not stopping, especially when the personality is evident through court docs, and public media claims that seem to be hypocritical at times, and are noted as lies when a researcher finds different in offical docs.


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3 7/28/09 -
Post by: no rose colored glasses on August 10, 2009, 09:39:37 PM
Do you think that Roger knows something about Lindsey, has some knowledge of what happened to her?

You know the thing in researching all the people that are surrounded by Lindsey, we can not make claim that anyone knows what happened to Lindsey, what we can do is research these people Lindsey was surrounded by and see whose behavior/background would need to be further researched. Does that kinda make sense no rose colored glasses? I find some of the personalities researched to be very susceptible to criminal mischief/behaviors.
Thanks, I understand.


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3 7/28/09 -
Post by: Tamikosmom on August 10, 2009, 09:42:14 PM

Janet - there are pics of her on her Myspace page...let me go find the link for ya.

Here is Marilyns myspace

http://www.myspace.com/batchessqua

Thanks Leroy.

Janet


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3 7/28/09 -
Post by: no rose colored glasses on August 10, 2009, 09:42:41 PM
you see it's a lie of marilyns  ... another huge lie... she says this guy lived with kara.  that he broke his rib crawling in her window that night because he lost his keys, and he goes to the bar all the time. and he is a cook at round house cafe. 

funny shortcake comes and confirms roger is in the bar with a broken rib.  wow she saw him and heard about his rib...

well after we chased this roger all over the place, we find out he is all made up.  another total lie by marilyn.  we find him alright... her oldest son's father who lives in fresno calif.

see what I mean.. .these are the people who have a trash campaign against kara and melissa and josh... so if people want to believe this crazy a$$ woman who is making up all this crap, oh well. 

she's a huge liar... the question is why.. why put this off on kara or melissa or josh.. why make up all these stories, why have other people who give info change their stories..

now you see why I get so annoyed about marilyn is credible etc.  its because we sit over here knowing it is all BS 

and this BS is hindering the search for lindsey.  and that is what makes me so mad.  I don't care if people want to be crazy, drink, do drugs, run amuck, whatever the heck they want to do , who cares, but when you do stuff to hinder finding a missing kid, that is when I get pissed off
Wow, very unbalanced people who do things like that, I don't even know what to say  ::MonkeyNoNo::


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3 7/28/09 -
Post by: no rose colored glasses on August 10, 2009, 09:43:14 PM
i am personally horrified that someone sent our kind-hearted posters on a wild goose chase about a man with a broken rib that may not even exist.
  ::MonkeyShocked::


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3 7/28/09 -
Post by: love4ever on August 10, 2009, 09:43:38 PM
Do you think that Roger knows something about Lindsey, has some knowledge of what happened to her?

You know the thing in researching all the people that are surrounded by Lindsey, we can not make claim that anyone knows what happened to Lindsey, what we can do is research these people Lindsey was surrounded by and see whose behavior/background would need to be further researched. Does that kinda make sense no rose colored glasses? I find some of the personalities researched to be very susceptible to criminal mischief/behaviors.
Thanks, I understand.

You are welcome, and lets say that is my emphasis on how I research, I kind of wander back and forth in my research, ask DD..LOL..But I do hope that some of the info I find is helpful, DD is better at putting things into perspective than I.  ::MonkeyAngel::


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3 7/28/09 -
Post by: no rose colored glasses on August 10, 2009, 09:45:39 PM
Do you think that Roger knows something about Lindsey, has some knowledge of what happened to her?

You know the thing in researching all the people that are surrounded by Lindsey, we can not make claim that anyone knows what happened to Lindsey, what we can do is research these people Lindsey was surrounded by and see whose behavior/background would need to be further researched. Does that kinda make sense no rose colored glasses? I find some of the personalities researched to be very susceptible to criminal mischief/behaviors.
Thanks, I understand.

You are welcome, and lets say that is my emphasis on how I research, I kind of wander back and forth in my research, ask DD..LOL..But I do hope that some of the info I find is helpful, DD is better at putting things into perspective than I.  ::MonkeyAngel::
Very helpful, actually I'm getting some different thoughts on the disappearance of Lindsey, and I'm not sure what to think about, what I'm thinking about right now  ::MonkeyConfused::


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3 7/28/09 -
Post by: love4ever on August 10, 2009, 09:47:44 PM
Ever heard that quote, there is no "I" in the word TEAM?...I believe in this, but everything has a critic of some sorts, Movies, Research, books and on and on...


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3 7/28/09 -
Post by: doubledecker on August 10, 2009, 09:50:37 PM
Do you think that Roger knows something about Lindsey, has some knowledge of what happened to her?

You know the thing in researching all the people that are surrounded by Lindsey, we can not make claim that anyone knows what happened to Lindsey, what we can do is research these people Lindsey was surrounded by and see whose behavior/background would need to be further researched. Does that kinda make sense no rose colored glasses? I find some of the personalities researched to be very susceptible to criminal mischief/behaviors.
Thanks, I understand.

You are welcome, and lets say that is my emphasis on how I research, I kind of wander back and forth in my research, ask DD..LOL..But I do hope that some of the info I find is helpful, DD is better at putting things into perspective than I.  ::MonkeyAngel::

well you are the one that matched the photos that got us to the truth of this rabbit in a hat magician roger... just appears out of nowhere.  like I said, something is just now right with someone making up all these lies trying to put the focus on other people.  it's one thing to think someone might be guilty, but to make up lies to try to make others think so, is crazy...

and then you get people in the community believing this crap... to the point they whisper and point and tell their kids melissa killed her daughter, what the heck. 



Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3 7/28/09 -
Post by: no rose colored glasses on August 10, 2009, 09:55:24 PM
Do you think that Roger knows something about Lindsey, has some knowledge of what happened to her?

You know the thing in researching all the people that are surrounded by Lindsey, we can not make claim that anyone knows what happened to Lindsey, what we can do is research these people Lindsey was surrounded by and see whose behavior/background would need to be further researched. Does that kinda make sense no rose colored glasses? I find some of the personalities researched to be very susceptible to criminal mischief/behaviors.
Thanks, I understand.

You are welcome, and lets say that is my emphasis on how I research, I kind of wander back and forth in my research, ask DD..LOL..But I do hope that some of the info I find is helpful, DD is better at putting things into perspective than I.  ::MonkeyAngel::

well you are the one that matched the photos that got us to the truth of this rabbit in a hat magician roger... just appears out of nowhere.  like I said, something is just now right with someone making up all these lies trying to put the focus on other people.  it's one thing to think someone might be guilty, but to make up lies to try to make others think so, is crazy...

and then you get people in the community believing this crap... to the point they whisper and point and tell their kids melissa killed her daughter, what the heck. 


This is insane, would I be close with my thinking that Marilyn has a vendeta against Melissa and will stop at nothing to get at her?


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3 7/28/09 -
Post by: A_News_Junkie_Monkey on August 10, 2009, 09:56:58 PM
OT - and so sorry, but important.  DD - see your email please.


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3 7/28/09 -
Post by: doubledecker on August 10, 2009, 09:58:26 PM
OT - and so sorry, but important.  DD - see your email please.

hmmm don't see an email, you mean pm?


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3 7/28/09 -
Post by: doubledecker on August 10, 2009, 10:03:53 PM
got it taken care of, thanks so much junkie


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3 7/28/09 -
Post by: Sister on August 10, 2009, 10:04:26 PM
no rose, sad to say, our courts are filled every day with people trying to get "even" or who have tried to get even or revenge and they don't care who they hurt.  It is appalling to say the least.  Taking responsibility for our own actions, not using excuses but admitting when wrong, knowing there are consequences for actions and words, having a strong ethic of respecting other people, their homes, their children, etc. are sadly taking a back seat.  I see it every day even in the small community where I live.  It truly breaks my heart.


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3 7/28/09 -
Post by: no rose colored glasses on August 10, 2009, 10:06:34 PM
no rose, sad to say, our courts are filled every day with people trying to get "even" or who have tried to get even or revenge and they don't care who they hurt.  It is appalling to say the least.  Taking responsibility for our own actions, not using excuses but admitting when wrong, knowing there are consequences for actions and words, having a strong ethic of respecting other people, their homes, their children, etc. are sadly taking a back seat.  I see it every day even in the small community where I live.  It truly breaks my heart.
It's horrible, and time consuming when time could be much better spent.


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3 7/28/09 -
Post by: doubledecker on August 10, 2009, 10:13:01 PM
there is an element in mccleary/elma that does not want lindsey found.  And I believe there is someone there who has info and won't say.  Of if they try to say, someone comes along and shuts them up.  And in the meantime others are sending people on wild goose chases when they get to close.  But what they do not understand, is this kind of behavior makes you start looking at them


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3 7/28/09 -
Post by: sunshine12 on August 10, 2009, 10:13:14 PM
i guess our friend shortcake has signed off for the night...


okay guys, time to get back to the business of finding lindsey...

does anyone know if ml's whereabouts have been verified for the night lindsey went missing/


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3 7/28/09 -
Post by: Tamikosmom on August 10, 2009, 10:14:54 PM
Think about it.  Only comments submitted to the KOMO website and ... snippets of posts submited to other sites brought over to the SM forum by Rob ... can be directly attributed to mlachester.

There is nothing in mlachester's own words regarding "Roger" being a "roommate" of Kara Kampen.  There is nothing in mlachester's own words regarding Roger climbing in a window and breaking his ribs in the process.

It is my sincere hope that Monkeys are not bashing the messenger who is attempting to reveal the dynamics encompassing the Baum family ... dynamics that branches of LE refused to acknowledge.

 ::MonkeyNoNo::

Janet

+++++++

ACCORDING TO MLACHESTER:

Rob
Re: Lindsey Baum #3 7/28/09 -
« Reply #896 on: August 08, 2009, 04:29:38 PM »


Quote
As far as the abuse Lindsey went threw the MPD knows the FBI also knows.

Quote
They have the reports I help Lindsey file

Quote
Just as of this moring when the FBI was at my house I made a comment about the 911 calls and the call to CPS.

http://scaredmonkeys.net/index.php?action=post;quote=904672;topic=5790.880;num_replies=1162;sesc=28414912316d49a494791fe51542bb71


mlachester:
To answer the questions everyone has asked, Yes I have talked to police and as far as things being unfounded its more of lazy work by cps and I don't know what the police were thinking. Since Lindsey has gone missing I have helped serch and put fliers up. I was called by the agents investigating and told them what I know. And this is no nick name everyone in McCleary knows who I am. Its no big secret she had came to my house to call 911 when her brother had done things to her. I hope lindsey is hiding and she finds a way to get to someone for help to tell them why. But as everyday gose by the fear gets worse.

http://www.king5.com/topstories/stories/NW_063009WAB-Mccleary-girl-search-LJ.1fc0b759.html?ocp=2#slcgm_comments_anchor


mlachester:
I am close to her and I know a lot more than the media or law enforcement are saying right now. As for Scanner, sorry if you don't like the truth but I have never been one to keep the truth in and she should of been taken the first time she called 911 from my house asking for help instead of put in a police car and taken back to her abuser!"

http://www.king5.com/topstories/stor...omments_anchor



Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3 7/28/09 -
Post by: doubledecker on August 10, 2009, 10:15:52 PM
i guess our friend shortcake has signed off for the night...


okay guys, time to get back to the business of finding lindsey...

does anyone know if ml's whereabouts have been verified for the night lindsey went missing/

I personally have no idea. 


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3 7/28/09 -
Post by: doubledecker on August 10, 2009, 10:19:39 PM
Think about it.  Only comments submitted to the KOMO website and ... snippets of posts submited to other sites brought over to the SM forum by Rob ... can be directly attributed to mlachester.

There is nothing in mlachester's own words regarding "Roger" being a "roommate" of Kara Kampen.  There is nothing in mlachester's own words regarding Roger climbing in a window and breaking his ribs in the process.

It is my sincere hope that Monkeys are not bashing the messenger who is attempting to reveal the dynamics encompassing the Baum family ... dynamics that branches of LE refused to acknowledge.

 ::MonkeyNoNo::

Janet

+++++++

ACCORDING TO MLACHESTER:

Rob
Re: Lindsey Baum #3 7/28/09 -
« Reply #896 on: August 08, 2009, 04:29:38 PM »


Quote
As far as the abuse Lindsey went threw the MPD knows the FBI also knows.

Quote
They have the reports I help Lindsey file

Quote
Just as of this moring when the FBI was at my house I made a comment about the 911 calls and the call to CPS.

http://scaredmonkeys.net/index.php?action=post;quote=904672;topic=5790.880;num_replies=1162;sesc=28414912316d49a494791fe51542bb71


mlachester:
To answer the questions everyone has asked, Yes I have talked to police and as far as things being unfounded its more of lazy work by cps and I don't know what the police were thinking. Since Lindsey has gone missing I have helped serch and put fliers up. I was called by the agents investigating and told them what I know. And this is no nick name everyone in McCleary knows who I am. Its no big secret she had came to my house to call 911 when her brother had done things to her. I hope lindsey is hiding and she finds a way to get to someone for help to tell them why. But as everyday gose by the fear gets worse.

http://www.king5.com/topstories/stories/NW_063009WAB-Mccleary-girl-search-LJ.1fc0b759.html?ocp=2#slcgm_comments_anchor


mlachester:
I am close to her and I know a lot more than the media or law enforcement are saying right now. As for Scanner, sorry if you don't like the truth but I have never been one to keep the truth in and she should of been taken the first time she called 911 from my house asking for help instead of put in a police car and taken back to her abuser!"

http://www.king5.com/topstories/stor...omments_anchor




I'll be elsewhere,  ::MonkeyTease::


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3 7/28/09 -
Post by: Lovinlife on August 10, 2009, 10:20:38 PM
i guess our friend shortcake has signed off for the night...


okay guys, time to get back to the business of finding lindsey...

does anyone know if ml's whereabouts have been verified for the night lindsey went missing/

I personally have no idea. 
What were you guys intently working on before this mystery "Roger" was thrown at your feet.  Maybe it was a distraction.


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3 7/28/09 -
Post by: Sister on August 10, 2009, 10:22:16 PM
omg -- I can't believe it -- yes, I can
:smt091

o/t dd, do you like stewed tomatoes?  Have a great recipe.


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3 7/28/09 -
Post by: Tamikosmom on August 10, 2009, 10:28:22 PM
Think about it.  Only comments submitted to the KOMO website and ... snippets of posts submited to other sites brought over to the SM forum by Rob ... can be directly attributed to mlachester.

There is nothing in mlachester's own words regarding "Roger" being a "roommate" of Kara Kampen.  There is nothing in mlachester's own words regarding Roger climbing in a window and breaking his ribs in the process.

It is my sincere hope that Monkeys are not bashing the messenger who is attempting to reveal the dynamics encompassing the Baum family ... dynamics that branches of LE refused to acknowledge.

 ::MonkeyNoNo::

Janet

+++++++

ACCORDING TO MLACHESTER:

Rob
Re: Lindsey Baum #3 7/28/09 -
« Reply #896 on: August 08, 2009, 04:29:38 PM »


Quote
As far as the abuse Lindsey went threw the MPD knows the FBI also knows.

Quote
They have the reports I help Lindsey file

Quote
Just as of this moring when the FBI was at my house I made a comment about the 911 calls and the call to CPS.

http://scaredmonkeys.net/index.php?action=post;quote=904672;topic=5790.880;num_replies=1162;sesc=28414912316d49a494791fe51542bb71


mlachester:
To answer the questions everyone has asked, Yes I have talked to police and as far as things being unfounded its more of lazy work by cps and I don't know what the police were thinking. Since Lindsey has gone missing I have helped serch and put fliers up. I was called by the agents investigating and told them what I know. And this is no nick name everyone in McCleary knows who I am. Its no big secret she had came to my house to call 911 when her brother had done things to her. I hope lindsey is hiding and she finds a way to get to someone for help to tell them why. But as everyday gose by the fear gets worse.

http://www.king5.com/topstories/stories/NW_063009WAB-Mccleary-girl-search-LJ.1fc0b759.html?ocp=2#slcgm_comments_anchor


mlachester:
I am close to her and I know a lot more than the media or law enforcement are saying right now. As for Scanner, sorry if you don't like the truth but I have never been one to keep the truth in and she should of been taken the first time she called 911 from my house asking for help instead of put in a police car and taken back to her abuser!"

http://www.king5.com/topstories/stor...omments_anchor




I'll be elsewhere,  ::MonkeyTease::

 ::MonkeyBike::


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3 7/28/09 -
Post by: Lovinlife on August 10, 2009, 10:30:14 PM
Don't take this the wrong way, sometimes I feel like you guys are speaking in a different language. I try to read this thread every day and I know there are some things you are working on that can't be posted here.  I assume some of you work together outside of this sight and that is great but I am totally lost here.  Will it get better or should I just give it up? ::MonkeyConfused::



Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3 7/28/09 -
Post by: Tamikosmom on August 10, 2009, 10:30:34 PM
My post was only meant for food for thought.

Good Night Monkeys!  Good Night Zookeepers!

Janet


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3 7/28/09 -
Post by: Sister on August 10, 2009, 10:31:46 PM
I appreciate the hard work that is being done here to help find Lindsey and bring her home.  Opinions are one thing, but facts are another.  I started to point out the lies again, but I don't think there is any need.
Prayers for Melissa Baum, Josh Baum, and their extended family and friends.  We will never, never quit.  We are working to bring Lindsey home.


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3 7/28/09 -
Post by: Sister on August 10, 2009, 10:35:42 PM
Think about it.  Only comments submitted to the KOMO website and ... snippets of posts submited to other sites brought over to the SM forum by Rob ... can be directly attributed to mlachester.

There is nothing in mlachester's own words regarding "Roger" being a "roommate" of Kara Kampen.  There is nothing in mlachester's own words regarding Roger climbing in a window and breaking his ribs in the process.

It is my sincere hope that Monkeys are not bashing the messenger who is attempting to reveal the dynamics encompassing the Baum family ... dynamics that branches of LE refused to acknowledge.
 ::MonkeyNoNo::
Janet
+++++++
ACCORDING TO MLACHESTER:
Rob
Re: Lindsey Baum #3 7/28/09 -
« Reply #896 on: August 08, 2009, 04:29:38 PM »

Quote
As far as the abuse Lindsey went threw the MPD knows the FBI also knows.
Quote
They have the reports I help Lindsey file
Quote
Just as of this moring when the FBI was at my house I made a comment about the 911 calls and the call to CPS.
http://scaredmonkeys.net/index.php?action=post;quote=904672;topic=5790.880;num_replies=1162;sesc=28414912316d49a494791fe51542bb71
mlachester:
To answer the questions everyone has asked, Yes I have talked to police and as far as things being unfounded its more of lazy work by cps and I don't know what the police were thinking. Since Lindsey has gone missing I have helped serch and put fliers up. I was called by the agents investigating and told them what I know. And this is no nick name everyone in McCleary knows who I am. Its no big secret she had came to my house to call 911 when her brother had done things to her. I hope lindsey is hiding and she finds a way to get to someone for help to tell them why. But as everyday gose by the fear gets worse.
http://www.king5.com/topstories/stories/NW_063009WAB-Mccleary-girl-search-LJ.1fc0b759.html?ocp=2#slcgm_comments_anchor
mlachester:
I am close to her and I know a lot more than the media or law enforcement are saying right now. As for Scanner, sorry if you don't like the truth but I have never been one to keep the truth in and she should of been taken the first time she called 911 from my house asking for help instead of put in a police car and taken back to her abuser!"
http://www.king5.com/topstories/stor...omments_anchor
I'll be elsewhere,  ::MonkeyTease::

 ::MonkeyBike::

You're welcome Janet, very welcome.


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3 7/28/09 -
Post by: Leroy on August 10, 2009, 10:37:16 PM
Don't take this the wrong way, sometimes I feel like you guys are speaking in a different language. I try to read this thread every day and I know there are some things you are working on that can't be posted here.  I assume some of you work together outside of this sight and that is great but I am totally lost here.  Will it get better or should I just give it up? ::MonkeyConfused::



Lovin - there are so many players and unanswered questions in this case that it can get very confusing.  Don't give up!!


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3 7/28/09 -
Post by: Sister on August 10, 2009, 10:38:45 PM
Don't take this the wrong way, sometimes I feel like you guys are speaking in a different language. I try to read this thread every day and I know there are some things you are working on that can't be posted here.  I assume some of you work together outside of this sight and that is great but I am totally lost here.  Will it get better or should I just give it up? ::MonkeyConfused::


Lovin, don't give up.  Some of the readers on this thread talk in code and sometimes some of the statements are meant to get them to speak up.  Sometimes it works and sometimes it doesn't.
As for me, the great debate of who was lying is over.  Now back to the research.


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3 7/28/09 -
Post by: Sister on August 10, 2009, 10:51:37 PM
My post was only meant for food for thought.
Good Night Monkeys!  Good Night Zookeepers!
Janet

Food for thought?  Think about it.  How insensitive is that with the monkey tricycle.  There are some monkeys here that are working their butts off to find facts and truth.  This is not a joke!  This is not cute either.  I will take your advice and completely ignore your posts.  Thank you so much for the suggestion.


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3 7/28/09 -
Post by: love4ever on August 10, 2009, 11:02:07 PM
Do you think that Roger knows something about Lindsey, has some knowledge of what happened to her?

You know the thing in researching all the people that are surrounded by Lindsey, we can not make claim that anyone knows what happened to Lindsey, what we can do is research these people Lindsey was surrounded by and see whose behavior/background would need to be further researched. Does that kinda make sense no rose colored glasses? I find some of the personalities researched to be very susceptible to criminal mischief/behaviors.
Thanks, I understand.

You are welcome, and lets say that is my emphasis on how I research, I kind of wander back and forth in my research, ask DD..LOL..But I do hope that some of the info I find is helpful, DD is better at putting things into perspective than I.  ::MonkeyAngel::

well you are the one that matched the photos that got us to the truth of this rabbit in a hat magician roger... just appears out of nowhere.  like I said, something is just now right with someone making up all these lies trying to put the focus on other people.  it's one thing to think someone might be guilty, but to make up lies to try to make others think so, is crazy...

and then you get people in the community believing this crap... to the point they whisper and point and tell their kids melissa killed her daughter, what the heck. 




We all research together, and thank you DD for acknowledgment, but I compliment, appreciate and respect the work you do, and your honesty. I work alot off of your leads. This is why I believe, and have ever since I was researching the Cantu case with you. If you present a lead, I will research like heck for hours, if I have time. Right now I have 2 weeks until fall semester starts, so I am dedicated to helping and not dismissing your leads. That is how I found what I did. You put the leads out there and I go for it. So thank you.. ::MonkeyDevil2::


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3 7/28/09 -
Post by: Tamikosmom on August 10, 2009, 11:05:08 PM
Sister ... I used the new tricycle icon as a way of signing off.  Not a joke.

Do you not think that I also have not put my heart and sole into my postings on this forum.  Is my avenue of research not considered worthy just because it does not conform to yours.  Until answers pertaining to the truth are forthcoming ... all avenues must be explored.  We are not all going to be on the same road in our journey to finding the answers but that is OK.  Respect and consideration is where it is at in regards to each of our perspectives.
   
Janet



Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3 7/28/09 -
Post by: love4ever on August 10, 2009, 11:05:23 PM
omg -- I can't believe it -- yes, I can
:smt091

o/t dd, do you like stewed tomatoes?  Have a great recipe.

Sister, I liked stewed tomatoes, but please don't pour them on my head!!!...Oh my (Gosh) <---   ::MonkeyRoll:: I am so childish... ::MonkeyCheer2::


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3 7/28/09 -
Post by: mamacrazy30 on August 10, 2009, 11:07:42 PM
holy crap a moley i'm at pg 68 trying to catch up...don't tell me now the suspense is too much.


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3 7/28/09 -
Post by: love4ever on August 10, 2009, 11:17:12 PM
Sister ... I used the new tricycle icon as a way of signing off.  Not a joke.

Do you not think that I also have not put my heart and sole into my postings on this forum.  Is my avenue of research not considered worthy just because it does not conform to yours.  Until answers pertaining to the truth are forthcoming ... all avenues must be explored.  We are not all going to be on the same road in our journey to finding the answers but that is OK.  Respect and consideration is where it is at in regards to each of our perspectives.
   
Janet



I find more of what you do is called critiquing, which is done with movies, books etc..it's done everywhere, so you are not wrong), but thing is, we never see our work being credited even if it is official docs, this is bothersome really. However, you are right in concerns with each individual. Everyone has a right to their own opinion, spec, theories or whatever it may be, but I never see the official docs being posted over and over when they are the actual truth. Furthermore, people can say whatever they want to and from the media, so taking their statements and breaking them down in comparison and contrast we can see alot of lies and discrepancies. That is simple in reasoning that I find disbelief in ones persona.


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3 7/28/09 -
Post by: mamacrazy30 on August 10, 2009, 11:22:35 PM
k, so i'm caught up....ml is lying..is it drugs? is it something more sinister or is it just very petty leading into lindsey's disappearance.   she knows something...(of course she does or she wouldn't s often state she knows things.  so now its time to figure out what things she knows.   if we disregard all we've listened to before we might really have a lead.  (yea i know that sounds off but it sounds better than things are gettin' good.)


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3 7/28/09 -
Post by: love4ever on August 10, 2009, 11:26:59 PM
I appreciate DD's work, and because i am more of a researcher than food for thought in speculations and theories, I work with DD. I work hard for her because I have found truth in her leads by my own research. There are times in our research that we can not find anything so we move on to what there IS to work with.  Another thing that is important to make note of is DD's dedication in both the Sandra Cantu's case and Lindseys. To disregard her work in a negative way, to me, is degrading.  This is not a game, it is not who is right or wrong, it is the hope and faith in finding leads that will bring Lindsey home.


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3 7/28/09 -
Post by: Sister on August 10, 2009, 11:30:26 PM
I appreciate DD's work, and because i am more of a researcher than food for thought in speculations and theories, I work with DD. I work hard for her because I have found truth in her leads by my own research. There are times in our research that we can not find anything so we move on to what there IS to work with.  Another thing that is important to make note of is DD's dedication in both the Sandra Cantu's case and Lindseys. To disregard her work in a negative way, to me, is degrading.  This is not a game, it is not who is right or wrong, it is the hope and faith in finding leads that will bring Lindsey home.

Well said, thank you.


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3 7/28/09 -
Post by: love4ever on August 10, 2009, 11:38:55 PM
I appreciate DD's work, and because i am more of a researcher than food for thought in speculations and theories, I work with DD. I work hard for her because I have found truth in her leads by my own research. There are times in our research that we can not find anything so we move on to what there IS to work with.  Another thing that is important to make note of is DD's dedication in both the Sandra Cantu's case and Lindseys. To disregard her work in a negative way, to me, is degrading.  This is not a game, it is not who is right or wrong, it is the hope and faith in finding leads that will bring Lindsey home.

Well said, thank you.

You are welcome Sister..


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3 7/28/09 -
Post by: pink angel on August 10, 2009, 11:41:14 PM
LE and FBI have talked to ML.

I know they have because I first reported her comments, back when she started spouting off on King5.com, she's also admitted they have talked to her. I am sure they found out real quick that she was BS'ing and a troublemaker.

jmo


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3 7/28/09 -
Post by: AZSunny on August 11, 2009, 12:08:59 AM
I appreciate DD's work, and because i am more of a researcher than food for thought in speculations and theories, I work with DD. I work hard for her because I have found truth in her leads by my own research. There are times in our research that we can not find anything so we move on to what there IS to work with.  Another thing that is important to make note of is DD's dedication in both the Sandra Cantu's case and Lindseys. To disregard her work in a negative way, to me, is degrading.  This is not a game, it is not who is right or wrong, it is the hope and faith in finding leads that will bring Lindsey home.
:smt041 :smt038 :smt038 :smt038 :smt041


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3 7/28/09 -
Post by: Tracygirl on August 11, 2009, 12:27:44 AM
Sister I like my tomatoes steamed, thank you.

Well said Love, this is about finding a little girl. If ML words are correct, get out and find the truth and find this girl. Posting comments made in a news section of a site is nothing. It is not varified, it is not valid, they are radom comments..  where is the proof it is correct and accurate and if you pull up another article I am going to  ::MonkeyMad::You want to know where Josh was, stop sitting there and posting about it, find out where he was and post that information! Am I being mean? Am I being rude? Fine, so be it so are you.
Many are trying to find out why ML would lie and if it can hopefully lead us to Lindsey. To be honest with you, I don't care if a drunk man dressed as a clown rode a bike and kidnapped lindsey and she is now working the snake bar at the circus and the person who discovers this is on scared monkeys, or that other site!!!! I want to find this girl and find her now!!!!

Lindsey little girl I know you are scared and want to come home. We are trying to find you..we are trying to find you. I don't NOT want this to be another Sandra, or Neveah, or Tori, I want this girl found alive and well.  ::MonkeyMad::



Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3 7/28/09 -
Post by: no rose colored glasses on August 11, 2009, 09:37:21 AM
I appreciate DD's work, and because i am more of a researcher than food for thought in speculations and theories, I work with DD. I work hard for her because I have found truth in her leads by my own research. There are times in our research that we can not find anything so we move on to what there IS to work with.  Another thing that is important to make note of is DD's dedication in both the Sandra Cantu's case and Lindseys. To disregard her work in a negative way, to me, is degrading.  This is not a game, it is not who is right or wrong, it is the hope and faith in finding leads that will bring Lindsey home.
I appreciate all your work and research, actually I'm looking at this case a little differently right now, I've been thinking about this all since I read all the posts yesterday, thanks for all of your hard work. ::MonkeyCool::


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3 7/28/09 -
Post by: doubledecker on August 11, 2009, 10:00:08 AM
good morning peeps!!!!

New Day!!!  clear mind, rested up and ready to go at it again. 

I must say this case can really drive a person up a wall.  We are all getting some short fuses here, and when the fuse gets to the very last piece and someone lights it up, there is no time to put it out and the bomb goes off. 

but as long as there are no casualties we can get back up and go again. 

these cases can bring out the worst in me, and I really really try not to get that way, so ... please know if I EVER DO BLOW UP on here, it's just because my patience is really thin these days with all these lies and it's nothing personal to anyone, it is just I have a short fuse to begin with, and I am doing my best not to explode.

I hope people know that I research EVERYTHING... how else are you going to figure out who did this or where she is.  you just have to keep looking everywhere, you can't just look at who you know is close to her, you have to look at everyone else also, as many times it is someone you never heard of.  It is not that we are just pulling names out of our hat, we hear these names. 

I have a "way" I CAN talk to people I do not know, I can do this, so I do it.  people wonder why in the world would anyone who never heard of me talk to me about things going on under the surface in some town like this.  I "just can".  that is all.  I can't tell you how or why, but I can.  It might seem impossible to some people, but ... oh well, I don't know what to tell you, I just know how to do this.  I'm certainly not just makinng this stuff up... that should be obvious by now, I get info and names and know who is who etc, where they live etc, down to the their drug of preference, you think I can just make that up ?  LOL 

so sorry if some people don't understand the way I do things, but it gets the info and that is all that matters.



 ::MonkeyAngel::


now regrouping and back to work. 


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3 7/28/09 -
Post by: KarmaRoundUp on August 11, 2009, 10:03:56 AM
KARA KAMPEN - SWIMMING

KaraK
Re: Lindsey Baum, 10y missing from McCleary, WA 6/26/09
« Reply #1578 on: July 07, 2009, 10:37:19 PM »


I'm going to try and catch up I know that I missed some questions but there will be a delay - we have to meet friends at the park who will be releasing some B-day balloons for Lindsey.

The girls were swimming at the same home both days. At the time the girls were there it was 2 to 3 other girls (9 to 12), Lindsey, my daughter and the mother of one of the other girls (the mother to the child whose house they were at). - Hope that makes sense.

As for the argument: according to my daughter right now: it started at Shell station (this is where they left the bike) then they continued walking til they were on Maple (I know this was confused earlier possibly because I didn't understand what Kayla was saying) they were several houses down from mine when the family friend (who apparently was visiting a another friend on this street) told Josh to go home.    - Does that make sense? If not I'll try to make it clearer but I got to run but will come back and try to catch up on any ?'s.

http://scaredmonkeys.net/index.php?topic=5541.msg868953#msg868953
Thank you Janet!
I completely missed that they swan there 2 days.


You are welcome Grandma Karma..

I heard through the Monkey grapevine.

 ::MonkeyJnBox::

CONGRATULATIONS!!.

Janet

Thank you Janet
::::still beaming::::


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3 7/28/09 -
Post by: no rose colored glasses on August 11, 2009, 10:07:18 AM
I have a "way" I CAN talk to people I do not know, I can do this, so I do it.     And I believe you, some people just have a knack when talking to people, and I'm glad you do.   ::MonkeyCool:: They feel comfortable and trusting when you talk to people.


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3 7/28/09 -
Post by: no rose colored glasses on August 11, 2009, 10:07:53 AM
Karma  ::MonkeyAngel::


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3 7/28/09 -
Post by: doubledecker on August 11, 2009, 10:18:05 AM
btw ... yesterday I was going to explain a little more about this "roger", but I got so mad I had to get off the board before I said a lot of things I shouldn't say. 

so I kind of left people hanging. 

what happened was I was given a name of roger.  I quickly saw that the name was misspelled, it was spelled the way it sounded, not the way it was spelled, so I took the phonics of the spelling I had and guessed the real spelling.  so we had a real name.  So we went looking for that person.  We found one in washington, but nothing about him was matching what this person should be...

so we had some photos and were looking to figure out who these people were.  Well, love4ever somehow ran into a photo of someone else who ended up on some page that had nothing to do with anyone... but they matched for sure.  we had a last name and these to pages, so we have to go through a ton of people to figure out what the connection was.  Then we realize we were in some extended family and sure enough these people were all tied together, so we had to read and read and go back to the genealogy route to figure out how these people all connected, but it worked and these people were immediate family.  And wow, there was roger.  how funny... someone make up a lie and use the name of some relative states away.  But you know a lot of people choose aliases of friends or relatives, just change the first name or use the middle name instead, and this is exactly what someone did.  so roger is a twisted up name made out of a relative states away who they thought no one would ever figure out. 

so roger does not exist there, we knew that about the time shortcake shows up to confirm roger is in the bar with a broken rib.  talk about a  ::MonkeyShocked::  Now what are the chances of that... so if we got a little weird on the board about that time when this personn insists they are confirming roger and on my butt I better quit posting about him and just tell the police, I was over here thinking, this is unreal. 

so you see, sometimes I will not seem to make sense on the board.  And sometimes it does seem like I am speaking another language, and sometimes I really am speaking another language, but these people understand that language... and this is one of the reasons they talk to me.  they understand me. 

so I have my own way of doing things, sorry people do not understand it, but that is just the way I am. If I get annoying just tell me and I will go, that is not a problem for me at all.  I come here to share for a reason.  A VERY GOOD reason, otherwise I probably would just go my way.  but for lindsey's sake I do post here.  you might not understand that either... but that is okay. 

I do have all the docs and photos etc to prove everything about this roger and who marilyn liar stuff, but to do so I would have to post a lot of photos of kids and their names, and I don't want to involve innocent kids in this mess, so I am not going to do that, but it is through kids that we were able to trace all of this stuff.  So sorry, I am not going to do that.  Otherwise I would put all the docs and photos out here, but you would never understand the connections unless I exposed the kids, and no one should want that.  so you either have to believe me or not. 


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3 7/28/09 -
Post by: no rose colored glasses on August 11, 2009, 10:32:59 AM
I believe you.


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3 7/28/09 -
Post by: no rose colored glasses on August 11, 2009, 10:47:03 AM
so roger does not exist there, we knew that about the time shortcake shows up to confirm roger is in the bar with a broken rib.        I wonder who this person is, and what game is being played, and why is a game being played?  ::MonkeyConfused::


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3 7/28/09 -
Post by: doubledecker on August 11, 2009, 10:50:24 AM
so roger does not exist there, we knew that about the time shortcake shows up to confirm roger is in the bar with a broken rib.        I wonder who this person is, and what game is being played, and why is a game being played?  ::MonkeyConfused::

someone trying to "confirm" marilyn's lies?  don't know.


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3 7/28/09 -
Post by: no rose colored glasses on August 11, 2009, 10:53:23 AM
so roger does not exist there, we knew that about the time shortcake shows up to confirm roger is in the bar with a broken rib.        I wonder who this person is, and what game is being played, and why is a game being played?  ::MonkeyConfused::

someone trying to "confirm" marilyn's lies?  don't know.
It would be nice instead of wasting time, they took this time and help find Lindsey  ::MonkeyConfused::


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3 7/28/09 -
Post by: doubledecker on August 11, 2009, 11:16:34 AM
see I never contacted any of these people... THEY contaced ME, way back... so they were funneling info to me all this time.. but see, much of the info was coming from marilyn and that info was lies.  Other info were names of people who I then find other people to talk with, well stories were not matching up.  So I go back and have someone ask marilyn again, and always her version changes and always makes it point to kara rather than the poeople other people are pointing at, every single time whatever info I had from others, when I go have someone ask marilyn, the story changed, always trying to send us to kara or melissa or josh...but the stories I hear from others don't point at kara or melissa or josh at all, they point to other places... so then I find out that the other places being pointed at are friends of marilyn, so she quickly tells the same stories basically but points them to kara's house or to melissa or josh rather than the real people these stories are connected to.. so all this time I know someone is lying.  It's very easy to see who is lying and who is not. 

but in the meantime we have all these lies all over mccleary and elma, all pointing at kara, melissa and josh.  and these lies are running rampant all over both those towns to the point people are sitting in the bars etc, keeping these lies going, until it is all over the place and no one will help melissa or kara to get anything going. 

sure there might be some upstanding people who know nothing about this, who are trying to help, but like they say, they have lives, they have jobs, they have families to support etc, life goes on, they can't be out there helping search or helping to organize searches etc, or doing whatever.  But on the other hand, the local drunks, druggies etc, can sit around all day long, point fingers, keep the lies going etc, and have everyone who could be out there helping, sit and point fingers at kara and melissa instead.  Believe me, this is affecting people from helping to search for lindsey etc. 

Then you have the local druggies etc, criminal element who do know something but they are not about to tell it to the cops, and they don't want anyone to know what they are saying.  In that lifestyle you just can't be saying anything.  so they are hush hush about anything they saw or hear, especially, when you have someone in that world changing the stories and causing people to say wow, we don't want involved in this mess. 

you have to understand that people in that lifestyle won't tell anything if they think it will cause them to get a jacket.  they just can't afford to live there with that kind of tag on them.  I understand that.  But they will tell someone who won't expose them.  "IF" they trust them.  but then you have to realize you are dealing with cranksters who imagine half of this stuff, so you have to get the names, the basics and then go make some sense out of it.  you can't just take everything they say as fact and go pass it on to the police because if you did that you would be ringing into the cops' ears 24/7 some meth induced BS.  LOL 

so its hard to sort out, but with names of who was where when, who knows who, some lifestyle background info, who is related to whom, etc, and a little work, you can figure this stuff out.

so the "games" in this mess are more of out and out lies to get misinformation out there and to get it "confirmed" when someone starts debunking it.  They want lies out here, not the truth... why is the question.  might be vendictiveness, revenge, etc... on the other hand might be to point away from the truth they don't want anyone to know. 

when digging through all this stuff in the past couple of days, some names pop of with direct connections, names I have been given before this, and tells me a lot about who is hanging out with whom and what they are "invovled" in.  not that I care what they are "involved" in, I don't, but it tells me what kind of environment this is, what they people's attitudes are about all of this, etc. 

and there are some connections to lindsey in all of this mess.  some direct connections.  she new some people she probably should not have.  There are some not so good places she was around.  People might seem okay or maybe she just made friends at school and ended up in these houses through her friends/kids, but they are houses no kids should be hanging out in.  Just because they draw the dark element there, someone in and out who might have a very dark side, yet even their close friends don't even know "how" dark.  It's there though, I see it.  Lindsey could have come into contact with some real whackjobs through some of these people.  It's no one's fault, it is just a fact that weirdos lurk among anyone, but when you get into these types of enviroments, even if there is a whacko and someone suspects them, no one tells.  that is the problem, it is the long learned code of silence.  Your "dog" turns out to be a whacko, and you won't tell anyone.  just the way it is.   


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3 7/28/09 -
Post by: doubledecker on August 11, 2009, 11:23:32 AM
so roger does not exist there, we knew that about the time shortcake shows up to confirm roger is in the bar with a broken rib.        I wonder who this person is, and what game is being played, and why is a game being played?  ::MonkeyConfused::

someone trying to "confirm" marilyn's lies?  don't know.
It would be nice instead of wasting time, they took this time and help find Lindsey  ::MonkeyConfused::

see this is another "clue"... if you care so much about this girl, why are you not looking?  who cares what you think of her mother or brother or kara?  you still look, don't you?  or is there a reason you don't look?  or a reason you sway others not to look?  why would you do that?  why aren't you out there trying to help get things set up if you like lindsey so much?  why are you hindering the truth?  why are you swaying others not to help kara and her mother set this stuff up so someone will get organized and look for her?  do you want her not found or what? 

let me tell you, and I would love for this to be the truth, although the chances are slim, but there are people in this world who would hide lindsey out.  And she was around these kinds of people.  I so hope maybe, just maybe she is among them alive and hidden.  It's POSSIBLE, very unlikely, but possible.  But NOW, everything is such a dang mess, who is going to want to admit they did this? even if for what they thought was a good reason in their own twisted up thoughts.  how are they going to get out of this mess now?  they are going to jail most likely.  Is this what is going on?  I don't have a clue, but I will say, there are people there she was around, who would do this.  and there are others who would know it and think "it is better not to get involved".  you tell on these kinds of people and you are going to have hell to pay if you have to still live there.  and you might have hell to pay if you moved 1000 miles away.  we aren't dealing with some little housemouses here.  We got some very hard core people tied up here.  Do they worry ME?  no, because I know how to deal with people like this. 

so if I get crazy weird on the board, that is why


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3 7/28/09 -
Post by: doubledecker on August 11, 2009, 11:44:35 AM
and we still have adam campbell out there....disappeared.... that bothers me.  seems everyone just poofs... madibabe is disappeared.... she should email me, let me know if she is okay. 

we still have this "white car" mess... so many people with the white car story, but the stories are so messed up, and coming from the same group of people.  how does the white car target ONLY this group and no one else?  that in itself is a bit strange, you have to wonder if someone did not make that all up as well.  The story certainly keeps changing that is for sure. 

one thing I do know, adam is gone, he should have been arrested for non-compliance, he wasn't, of if he was the jail was told not to tell anyone he was there.  so where is he?  but the thing about him is... the next day after they talked with adam the police and feds along with pierce county popped right back up in mccleary full force with the dogs and going house to house again... did that have anything to do with adam?  I don't know, but the "timing" sure is a "coincidence".  police said oh the reward caused new tips, but this was a couple of weeks after the reward, and they also stated they enlisted the other help because they did not want to sit on tips, well they had been sitting for 2 weeks after the reward, so hmmm, that makes no sense... so you just have to wonder if adam campbell really did know something. 

adam campbell is an SO, charged when he was around 17 yrs old, he then spent a couple of years in the mental facility, kept petitioning the court to get out but they kept denying him, but he finally got out.  after that he picked up a couple of petty things, a restraining order and a bunch of non- compliances etc... but for the most part he did not seem to re-offend... don't think I am sticking up for an SO here, I'm not, but adam is a different breed of SO... I do believe he was homeless and around a lot of things... I do believe he really was trying to give some info on lindsey's guestbook; was it real info or was it something he had congered up in his mind?  who knows... but where is he? 

then you have the lady who swears she saw adam with lindsey on the roy freeway, but no one will listen to her.  I offered to help get a sketch artist to her, no one is taking me up on that offer... why?  I even got the name to call for the sketch artist... no one answers, why?  do the police not need a sketch so they did not get one because they already know who that was?  or what?  if they believe it is not adam, well then aren't they concerned that two men were dragging a young girl down the highway and out into the woods?  something is not right?  they must know who these people were... so why would no one else want the sketch artist?  hey I am willing to make sure they get one.  no one seems to want to do that... why?

must already know who the people are?  I guess... and all the people involved in that are not poof.  why? 

something is not right in dodge.



Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3 7/28/09 -
Post by: doubledecker on August 11, 2009, 11:50:35 AM
I just wonder when the day will come when I get "the phone call" that tells me to get off the net and shut up.  I expect it any day now, but until then, I will keep putting my thoughts out here. 

this is all just so mind-boggling.  but little by little, precept upon precept, we dig.  we uncover, we sort, we put it through the wash, until we can actually see what we are looking at.  some of this stuff is so buried beneath the garbage dump, it's a mess.

someone needs a backhoe and a dumptruck.  better yet a real att.truck


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3 7/28/09 -
Post by: doubledecker on August 11, 2009, 11:52:08 AM
they say if the shoe fits wear it.... but I say where the shu is, it fits.


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3 7/28/09 -
Post by: doubledecker on August 11, 2009, 11:53:22 AM
it's another nice day to fly a kite, not too windy but just a nice breeze..  ::MonkeyCool::


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3 7/28/09 -
Post by: no rose colored glasses on August 11, 2009, 12:16:13 PM
DD, I just finished reading all your posts on this page  ::MonkeyEek::  I don't know what to say, digesting everything, like I said I have sort of changed my perception of what happened. This is going to sound stupid, but after looking at Marilyn's myspace, the pic of her and her husband, my very first thought was they reminded me of gang bangers. One of the other pics of her and those eyes, I've seen those eyes before, my sister in law, crazy as can be. But there is crazy where it is harmless crazy, and crazy where it sure isn't harmless  ::MonkeyEek::


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3 7/28/09 -
Post by: no rose colored glasses on August 11, 2009, 12:32:00 PM
So my thoughts for the day are, I believe someone saw Lindsey, whether she got into a car, or went into someone's home, and the person who saw is not talking, for their reasons. I have no doubt in my mind that Lindsey was going to different people's houses to play with friends and there was a bad element hanging around.


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3 7/28/09 -
Post by: no rose colored glasses on August 11, 2009, 12:41:22 PM
Wyks, I see you up there, I've been so worried about you  ::MonkeyAngel::


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3 7/28/09 -
Post by: Lovinlife on August 11, 2009, 01:08:57 PM
Thank you Doubledecker for explaining it all so that I can understand.  I didn't mean to offend, I was just reaching out for help in understanding and now I do so thank you for your time and effort.  Have a great day kite flying  ::MonkeyWink::


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3 7/28/09 -
Post by: doubledecker on August 11, 2009, 01:11:23 PM
there are goodhearted "crazy" people and there are very dark "crazy" people.  sometimes the good hearted crazy people get something in their head for whatever reason and decided to jump in and take up the cause, whatever they feel that cause is... might be a good cause, might be a bad cause, might just be a "crazy" cause...might be a drunk or drug induced "cause".  Everything is fine until the police and feds jump into the mix and then what... person decides crap, what a mess I am in.  Is their belief in their cause so great they are willing to go to prison over it?  Usually not.  they care, but they don't care enough to spend years in prison, probably don't even care enought to rish an arrest... then what? 

now depending on who these people know, a person might seek the help of friends to get out of this mess.  The thought of going to prison can cause people to do some weird stuff they might not otherwise be doing, but left in a situation where the choice is go to prison or whatever, the whatever might seem to them a better choice.  In a situation like this "theory", someone outside looking in needs to come up with some alternative option to offer them. 

then you have the possibility a lot of people really do know what is going on here but they are not going to say.   so maybe it is time to offer those people an option.  They don't like going to jail either.  Heck who does, no one.  so some little petty nobody who has some info most likely will choose to tell the info rather than go to jail.  I say make a drug sweep through those two towns and they are liable to get some info. 


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3 7/28/09 -
Post by: doubledecker on August 11, 2009, 01:13:24 PM
Thank you Doubledecker for explaining it all so that I can understand.  I didn't mean to offend, I was just reaching out for help in understanding and now I do so thank you for your time and effort.  Have a great day kite flying  ::MonkeyWink::

I don't get offended at all.. it is very understandable that there are many times no one understands me.  sometimes a few things are even meant to be that way... when I have to get a message out there and I can't say what I mean, it does kind of get a little hard to understand. 

feel free to ask me any time to explain.  either I will, or I will give you a good reason why I can't


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3 7/28/09 -
Post by: no rose colored glasses on August 11, 2009, 01:16:41 PM
there are goodhearted "crazy" people and there are very dark "crazy" people.  sometimes the good hearted crazy people get something in their head for whatever reason and decided to jump in and take up the cause, whatever they feel that cause is... might be a good cause, might be a bad cause, might just be a "crazy" cause...might be a drunk or drug induced "cause".  Everything is fine until the police and feds jump into the mix and then what... person decides crap, what a mess I am in.  Is their belief in their cause so great they are willing to go to prison over it?  Usually not.  they care, but they don't care enough to spend years in prison, probably don't even care enought to rish an arrest... then what? 

now depending on who these people know, a person might seek the help of friends to get out of this mess.  The thought of going to prison can cause people to do some weird stuff they might not otherwise be doing, but left in a situation where the choice is go to prison or whatever, the whatever might seem to them a better choice.  In a situation like this "theory", someone outside looking in needs to come up with some alternative option to offer them. 

then you have the possibility a lot of people really do know what is going on here but they are not going to say.   so maybe it is time to offer those people an option.  They don't like going to jail either.  Heck who does, no one.  so some little petty nobody who has some info most likely will choose to tell the info rather than go to jail.  I say make a drug sweep through those two towns and they are liable to get some info. 
Interesting....


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3 7/28/09 -
Post by: rebelgirl901 on August 11, 2009, 03:03:08 PM
[[/quote]
see this is another "clue"... if you care so much about this girl, why are you not looking?  who cares what you think of her mother or brother or kara?  you still look, don't you?  or is there a reason you don't look?  or a reason you sway others not to look?  why would you do that?  why aren't you out there trying to help get things set up if you like lindsey so much?  why are you hindering the truth?  why are you swaying others not to help kara and her mother set this stuff up so someone will get organized and look for her?  do you want her not found or what? 

let me tell you, and I would love for this to be the truth, although the chances are slim, but there are people in this world who would hide lindsey out.  And she was around these kinds of people.  I so hope maybe, just maybe she is among them alive and hidden.  It's POSSIBLE, very unlikely, but possible.  But NOW, everything is such a dang mess, who is going to want to admit they did this? even if for what they thought was a good reason in their own twisted up thoughts.  how are they going to get out of this mess now?  they are going to jail most likely.  Is this what is going on?  I don't have a clue, but I will say, there are people there she was around, who would do this.  and there are others who would know it and think "it is better not to get involved".  you tell on these kinds of people and you are going to have hell to pay if you have to still live there.  and you might have hell to pay if you moved 1000 miles away.  we aren't dealing with some little housemouses here.  We got some very hard core people tied up here.  Do they worry ME?  no, because I know how to deal with people like this. 

so if I get crazy weird on the board, that is why
[/quote]

Could it be that they know where Lindsey is & what happened to her and they are trying to divert attention from the person/persons responsible?  This ML sounds like a real nutcase and I think she knows something and is covering for someone and that's why she is telling all these lies and making up things to confuse those that may be getting close to the truth.  JMHO

There are some strange things happening in that town. 


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3 7/28/09 -
Post by: Sister on August 11, 2009, 04:16:11 PM
[
see this is another "clue"... if you care so much about this girl, why are you not looking?  who cares what you think of her mother or brother or kara?  you still look, don't you?  or is there a reason you don't look?  or a reason you sway others not to look?  why would you do that?  why aren't you out there trying to help get things set up if you like lindsey so much?  why are you hindering the truth?  why are you swaying others not to help kara and her mother set this stuff up so someone will get organized and look for her?  do you want her not found or what? 

let me tell you, and I would love for this to be the truth, although the chances are slim, but there are people in this world who would hide lindsey out.  And she was around these kinds of people.  I so hope maybe, just maybe she is among them alive and hidden.  It's POSSIBLE, very unlikely, but possible.  But NOW, everything is such a dang mess, who is going to want to admit they did this? even if for what they thought was a good reason in their own twisted up thoughts.  how are they going to get out of this mess now?  they are going to jail most likely.  Is this what is going on?  I don't have a clue, but I will say, there are people there she was around, who would do this.  and there are others who would know it and think "it is better not to get involved".  you tell on these kinds of people and you are going to have hell to pay if you have to still live there.  and you might have hell to pay if you moved 1000 miles away.  we aren't dealing with some little housemouses here.  We got some very hard core people tied up here.  Do they worry ME?  no, because I know how to deal with people like this. 

so if I get crazy weird on the board, that is why
[/quote]

Could it be that they know where Lindsey is & what happened to her and they are trying to divert attention from the person/persons responsible?  This ML sounds like a real nutcase and I think she knows something and is covering for someone and that's why she is telling all these lies and making up things to confuse those that may be getting close to the truth.  JMHO

There are some strange things happening in that town. 
[/quote]

rebelgirl, I think you are absolutely right.  If you and a crowd are watching a blazing fire to the left, you miss what is happening to the right or behind you.  Diverted attention.  There has been a lot of that in this case, which continues to beg the question why.  Usually it is because I don't want you looking at me, so I almost compel you to look elsewhere.  Thus, the Roger Rabbitt hunt.


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3 7/28/09 -
Post by: sherip on August 11, 2009, 04:16:40 PM
you see it's a lie of marilyns  ... another huge lie... she says this guy lived with kara.  that he broke his rib crawling in her window that night because he lost his keys, and he goes to the bar all the time. and he is a cook at round house cafe. 

funny shortcake comes and confirms roger is in the bar with a broken rib.  wow she saw him and heard about his rib...

well after we chased this roger all over the place, we find out he is all made up.  another total lie by marilyn.  we find him alright... her oldest son's father who lives in fresno calif.

see what I mean.. .these are the people who have a trash campaign against kara and melissa and josh... so if people want to believe this crazy a$$ woman who is making up all this crap, oh well. 

she's a huge liar... the question is why.. why put this off on kara or melissa or josh.. why make up all these stories, why have other people who give info change their stories..

now you see why I get so annoyed about marilyn is credible etc.  its because we sit over here knowing it is all BS 

and this BS is hindering the search for lindsey.  and that is what makes me so mad.  I don't care if people want to be crazy, drink, do drugs, run amuck, whatever the heck they want to do , who cares, but when you do stuff to hinder finding a missing kid, that is when I get pissed off

This may be a little far fetched but does anyone know where ML was on the night Lindsey disappeared? Or do you know where she is living at the current time?  I have no problem snooping around and taking some pictures of her home if it is still in this general area, just let me know where to find her.  I saw a tagged photo on ML myspace of a friend of hers - from Port Haddlock which is fairly close to Forks, WA. (Back to that Forks thing again) Is it possible that ML could have taken Lindsey and stashed her somewhere as a get back at MB or JB over some past problem - maybe an issue with her dog?  Maybe things got out of hand with all of the police and FBI involvement and she is afraid to return Lindsey. She really is feeling like a "melissa huckaby" to me right now with all of her stories about shovel's and knives and Roger with a broken rib sneaking into Kara's house.  Wow - what a strange person.


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3 7/28/09 -
Post by: no rose colored glasses on August 11, 2009, 04:16:45 PM
[
see this is another "clue"... if you care so much about this girl, why are you not looking?  who cares what you think of her mother or brother or kara?  you still look, don't you?  or is there a reason you don't look?  or a reason you sway others not to look?  why would you do that?  why aren't you out there trying to help get things set up if you like lindsey so much?  why are you hindering the truth?  why are you swaying others not to help kara and her mother set this stuff up so someone will get organized and look for her?  do you want her not found or what? 

let me tell you, and I would love for this to be the truth, although the chances are slim, but there are people in this world who would hide lindsey out.  And she was around these kinds of people.  I so hope maybe, just maybe she is among them alive and hidden.  It's POSSIBLE, very unlikely, but possible.  But NOW, everything is such a dang mess, who is going to want to admit they did this? even if for what they thought was a good reason in their own twisted up thoughts.  how are they going to get out of this mess now?  they are going to jail most likely.  Is this what is going on?  I don't have a clue, but I will say, there are people there she was around, who would do this.  and there are others who would know it and think "it is better not to get involved".  you tell on these kinds of people and you are going to have hell to pay if you have to still live there.  and you might have hell to pay if you moved 1000 miles away.  we aren't dealing with some little housemouses here.  We got some very hard core people tied up here.  Do they worry ME?  no, because I know how to deal with people like this. 

so if I get crazy weird on the board, that is why
[/quote]

Could it be that they know where Lindsey is & what happened to her and they are trying to divert attention from the person/persons responsible?  This ML sounds like a real nutcase and I think she knows something and is covering for someone and that's why she is telling all these lies and making up things to confuse those that may be getting close to the truth.  JMHO

There are some strange things happening in that town. 
[/quote]That's what I'm beginning to think.


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3 7/28/09 -
Post by: no rose colored glasses on August 11, 2009, 04:22:47 PM
sherip  I was wondering also where Marilyn was that night  ::MonkeyEek::


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3 7/28/09 -
Post by: sherip on August 11, 2009, 04:38:55 PM
sherip  I was wondering also where Marilyn was that night  ::MonkeyEek::

It appears that Lindsey would have trusted her - she most likely would have went with her without any fuss. Something is really wrong with her.....


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3 7/28/09 -
Post by: no rose colored glasses on August 11, 2009, 04:41:51 PM
sherip  I was wondering also where Marilyn was that night  ::MonkeyEek::

It appears that Lindsey would have trusted her - she most likely would have went with her without any fuss. Something is really wrong with her.....
I totally agree  ::MonkeyEek::


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3 7/28/09 -
Post by: sherip on August 11, 2009, 04:59:03 PM
sherip  I was wondering also where Marilyn was that night  ::MonkeyEek::

It appears that Lindsey would have trusted her - she most likely would have went with her without any fuss. Something is really wrong with her.....
I totally agree  ::MonkeyEek::

You know I actually hope with all my heart that we are right - that ML is crazy and has Lindsey stashed unharmed somewhere.
The other scenerios are just to sad to think about.  My heart goes out to Lindseys family and friends - every moment that she is gone has got to be a living hell for them, their lives will never be the same no matter what the outcome of this is.

The innocence is gone forever now for all of her little friends in McCleary, who were just hanging out and having a good time during their school break - like kids are supposed to do during the summer.



Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3 7/28/09 -
Post by: KarmaRoundUp on August 11, 2009, 05:12:36 PM
Good God!
I was trying to read all of those silly and distracting motions baez and lyin filed.They state they need to have the fraud case judged after the death penalty case because it's a well known fact that attys need anywhere from 500 hours to 1000 hours to prepare for the death penalty case.
So how long has lyin been on the case?
There are approx. 480 hours per month(working on case 8 hours a day,5 days a week).Death penalty brought back in April.....so we'll not even count April.4 months x 480 hours=1,920 hours and that's for baez and team and lyin and her crew combined.
So what's the big deal baez?You still have at least 5 months to go with 480 hours per month and you have already used about 1,920 hours working on this death penalty case!Idiot!
And you might get distracted with the fraud case?Sure that's the only reason you don't want the fraud case before the death penalty case?LOL
I swear someone has to stand up one of these day and just WHAUMP baez upside his head.

     ::MonkeyGavel:: ::MonkeyMad:: ::MonkeyGavel::


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3 7/28/09 -
Post by: KarmaRoundUp on August 11, 2009, 05:15:19 PM
Good God!
I was trying to read all of those silly and distracting motions baez and lyin filed.They state they need to have the fraud case judged after the death penalty case because it's a well known fact that attys need anywhere from 500 hours to 1000 hours to prepare for the death penalty case.
So how long has lyin been on the case?
There are approx. 480 hours per month(working on case 8 hours a day,5 days a week).Death penalty brought back in April.....so we'll not even count April.4 months x 480 hours=1,920 hours and that's for baez and team and lyin and her crew combined.
So what's the big deal baez?You still have at least 5 months to go with 480 hours per month and you have already used about 1,920 hours working on this death penalty case!Idiot!
And you might get distracted with the fraud case?Sure that's the only reason you don't want the fraud case before the death penalty case?LOL
I swear someone has to stand up one of these day and just WHAUMP baez upside his head.

     ::MonkeyGavel:: ::MonkeyMad:: ::MonkeyGavel::
YIKES!
Sorry
::::::erase,erase,erase:::::::


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3 7/28/09 -
Post by: no rose colored glasses on August 11, 2009, 05:20:26 PM
 Karma  ::MonkeyDevil::  I think I just read that in Caylee's thread.


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3 7/28/09 -
Post by: KarmaRoundUp on August 11, 2009, 05:26:55 PM
Karma  ::MonkeyDevil::  I think I just read that in Caylee's thread.
LOL....I posted it here first.   :smt103 :smt120 :oops: :oops:


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3 7/28/09 -
Post by: no rose colored glasses on August 11, 2009, 05:28:09 PM
Karma  ::MonkeyDevil::  I think I just read that in Caylee's thread.
LOL....I posted it here first.   :smt103 :smt120 :oops: :oops:
  ::MonkeyCool::


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3 7/28/09 -
Post by: Leroy on August 11, 2009, 05:38:34 PM
Karma  ::MonkeyDevil::  I think I just read that in Caylee's thread.

Me too NoRose...  I thought I was really losing it this time   ::MonkeyHaHa:: 


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3 7/28/09 -
Post by: KarmaRoundUp on August 11, 2009, 05:41:29 PM
Karma  ::MonkeyDevil::  I think I just read that in Caylee's thread.

Me too NoRose...  I thought I was really losing it this time   ::MonkeyHaHa:: 
::MonkeyLaugh::


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3 7/28/09 -
Post by: Wyks on August 11, 2009, 05:57:20 PM
Wyks, I see you up there, I've been so worried about you  ::MonkeyAngel::

Hi NRCG!!  I've missed you and my other monkey friends!!  Been reading this from the beginning thread and it's taken me daysssssssss to get thru all the posts!  Am glad to be almost caught up with y'all.   ::MonkeyWink:: 

Soooooo good to see so many familiar 'faces', and happy to be back online.   ::MonkeyDance::  I've missed everyone so much. 



Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3 7/28/09 -
Post by: Sister on August 11, 2009, 06:10:19 PM
sherip  I was wondering also where Marilyn was that night  ::MonkeyEek::

It appears that Lindsey would have trusted her - she most likely would have went with her without any fuss. Something is really wrong with her.....
I totally agree  ::MonkeyEek::

You know I actually hope with all my heart that we are right - that ML is crazy and has Lindsey stashed unharmed somewhere.
The other scenerios are just to sad to think about.  My heart goes out to Lindseys family and friends - every moment that she is gone has got to be a living hell for them, their lives will never be the same no matter what the outcome of this is.

The innocence is gone forever now for all of her little friends in McCleary, who were just hanging out and having a good time during their school break - like kids are supposed to do during the summer.


Sherip, I agree.  It is sad the innocence is gone.
Wyks, we've missed you on the Cantu thread too.  Most have been busy here trying to get this precious young lady home again.


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3 7/28/09 -
Post by: Wyks on August 11, 2009, 06:12:06 PM
Good God!
I was trying to read all of those silly and distracting motions baez and lyin filed.They state they need to have the fraud case judged after the death penalty case because it's a well known fact that attys need anywhere from 500 hours to 1000 hours to prepare for the death penalty case.
So how long has lyin been on the case?
There are approx. 480 hours per month(working on case 8 hours a day,5 days a week).Death penalty brought back in April.....so we'll not even count April.4 months x 480 hours=1,920 hours and that's for baez and team and lyin and her crew combined.
So what's the big deal baez?You still have at least 5 months to go with 480 hours per month and you have already used about 1,920 hours working on this death penalty case!Idiot!
And you might get distracted with the fraud case?Sure that's the only reason you don't want the fraud case before the death penalty case?LOL
I swear someone has to stand up one of these day and just WHAUMP baez upside his head.

     ::MonkeyGavel:: ::MonkeyMad:: ::MonkeyGavel::



(http://i439.photobucket.com/albums/qq117/Wyks_/Caylee/judgespanks.gif)


 ::MonkeyHaHa::   ::MonkeyCool::



Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3 7/28/09 -
Post by: no rose colored glasses on August 11, 2009, 06:14:17 PM
Wyks, I see you up there, I've been so worried about you  ::MonkeyAngel::

Hi NRCG!!  I've missed you and my other monkey friends!!  Been reading this from the beginning thread and it's taken me daysssssssss to get thru all the posts!  Am glad to be almost caught up with y'all.   ::MonkeyWink:: 

Soooooo good to see so many familiar 'faces', and happy to be back online.   ::MonkeyDance::  I've missed everyone so much. 


We have missed you also  ::MonkeyAngel::  This is something, poor Lindsey.


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3 7/28/09 -
Post by: Wyks on August 11, 2009, 06:19:48 PM
sherip  I was wondering also where Marilyn was that night  ::MonkeyEek::

It appears that Lindsey would have trusted her - she most likely would have went with her without any fuss. Something is really wrong with her.....
I totally agree  ::MonkeyEek::

You know I actually hope with all my heart that we are right - that ML is crazy and has Lindsey stashed unharmed somewhere.
The other scenerios are just to sad to think about.  My heart goes out to Lindseys family and friends - every moment that she is gone has got to be a living hell for them, their lives will never be the same no matter what the outcome of this is.

The innocence is gone forever now for all of her little friends in McCleary, who were just hanging out and having a good time during their school break - like kids are supposed to do during the summer.


Sherip, I agree.  It is sad the innocence is gone.
Wyks, we've missed you on the Cantu thread too.  Most have been busy here trying to get this precious young lady home again.

I also was wondering where ML was that night, during those hours. 

~~~

And thanks Sister, I've missed being in the Cantu thread.  It's where I'm headed next, to get caught up.  Then Haleigh's thread.  And then... gosh, so many threads, so little time in the day...   ::MonkeyWink:: 



Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3 7/28/09 -
Post by: JessStar on August 11, 2009, 06:26:42 PM
Wyks, I see you up there, I've been so worried about you  ::MonkeyAngel::

Hi NRCG!!  I've missed you and my other monkey friends!!  Been reading this from the beginning thread and it's taken me daysssssssss to get thru all the posts!  Am glad to be almost caught up with y'all.   ::MonkeyWink:: 

Soooooo good to see so many familiar 'faces', and happy to be back online.   ::MonkeyDance::  I've missed everyone so much. 



Wyks!!!!! Welcome Back!  I've missed you and your great insights.  Glad to have you back--I was wondering where you've been hidin'!

 ::MonkeyCheer3:: ::MonkeyCheer4::


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3 7/28/09 -
Post by: KarmaRoundUp on August 11, 2009, 06:33:33 PM
Good God!
I was trying to read all of those silly and distracting motions baez and lyin filed.They state they need to have the fraud case judged after the death penalty case because it's a well known fact that attys need anywhere from 500 hours to 1000 hours to prepare for the death penalty case.
So how long has lyin been on the case?
There are approx. 480 hours per month(working on case 8 hours a day,5 days a week).Death penalty brought back in April.....so we'll not even count April.4 months x 480 hours=1,920 hours and that's for baez and team and lyin and her crew combined.
So what's the big deal baez?You still have at least 5 months to go with 480 hours per month and you have already used about 1,920 hours working on this death penalty case!Idiot!
And you might get distracted with the fraud case?Sure that's the only reason you don't want the fraud case before the death penalty case?LOL
I swear someone has to stand up one of these day and just WHAUMP baez upside his head.

     ::MonkeyGavel:: ::MonkeyMad:: ::MonkeyGavel::



(http://i439.photobucket.com/albums/qq117/Wyks_/Caylee/judgespanks.gif)


 ::MonkeyHaHa::   ::MonkeyCool::


YEAH!Just like that lol
Good to see you Wyks.


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3 7/28/09 -
Post by: Wyks on August 11, 2009, 06:35:13 PM
Wyks, I see you up there, I've been so worried about you  ::MonkeyAngel::

Hi NRCG!!  I've missed you and my other monkey friends!!  Been reading this from the beginning thread and it's taken me daysssssssss to get thru all the posts!  Am glad to be almost caught up with y'all.   ::MonkeyWink:: 

Soooooo good to see so many familiar 'faces', and happy to be back online.   ::MonkeyDance::  I've missed everyone so much. 


We have missed you also  ::MonkeyAngel::  This is something, poor Lindsey.

Awww thanks NRCG, you are so sweet!   ::MonkeyAngel::

And yes, poor Lindsey.  One would think that our small towns in the US would be safe for kids, but sadly it seems even that isn't so true anymore.  Sigh. 

While catching up on Lindsey's threads, I saw a video of her mother, saying that this was "the first time" Lindsey went out without her phone, and "the first time" she went out alone. 

I was kind of surprised to hear her say that Lindsey hadn't been out alone before.  That's not the impression I have of Lindsey.  Seems to me that both Lindsey and Josh have been pretty much free to come and go as they please, with curfew at 10p. 

Am thinking back to my sons, who even at eighteen had 10p for their curfew.  And I just have to wonder.... what was Lindsey's mom thinking??? 

Sigh...  ::MonkeyNoNo::


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3 7/28/09 -
Post by: no rose colored glasses on August 11, 2009, 06:39:01 PM
I don't believe that was the first time Lindsey was out alone, maybe without her phone, but not by herself.


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3 7/28/09 -
Post by: Wyks on August 11, 2009, 06:45:54 PM
Wyks, I see you up there, I've been so worried about you  ::MonkeyAngel::

Hi NRCG!!  I've missed you and my other monkey friends!!  Been reading this from the beginning thread and it's taken me daysssssssss to get thru all the posts!  Am glad to be almost caught up with y'all.   ::MonkeyWink:: 

Soooooo good to see so many familiar 'faces', and happy to be back online.   ::MonkeyDance::  I've missed everyone so much. 



Wyks!!!!! Welcome Back!  I've missed you and your great insights.  Glad to have you back--I was wondering where you've been hidin'!

 ::MonkeyCheer3:: ::MonkeyCheer4::

Thanks JessStar!!  Been hidin' offline, cuz my dinosaur of a computer bit the dust.   ::MonkeyWaa::  Am now using my son's old computer, which is just a bit younger dinosaur than my old one.  lol.  Was hoping he'd give me his new computer, but alas and alack, that's not gonna happen anytime soon.  hehe   ::MonkeyWink:: 

Glad to see you in here, sharing your wisdom.  Many smart monkeys teaming up on this case, which is a good thing!!   Am itching to jump right in! 



Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3 7/28/09 -
Post by: doubledecker on August 11, 2009, 06:51:56 PM
I want to clear this up for this board and for everyone who comes here from other boards to read etc.  I see all over the net how this is totally out of hand, people are misunderstanding what I have said etc.  One of the main reasons for this misunderstanding is because there are people who either do not read all the posts I make(which is understandable, who wants to go back 10 threads and catch up) so they get the bits and pieces in the recent posts they read.   OR they read tomikasmom's posts where she is constanting taking what I post out of context, snipping it to prove her point, then lists ME as the SOURCE, after she has it totally backwards. 

Everything I have posted that I was told from a local who was talking to MARILYN LACHESTER, was not posted by me as truth, in fact most of it I new to be LIES< and I posted it in the context that it was LIES BY ML... I never posted that stuff to be the truth or the source to substantiate what MARILYN said.  I was proving her a LIAR and showing the extent she goes to to LIE>  yes, tomikasmom keeps taking this stuff, snipping it, listing ME as the SOURCE of it after she butchers it to fit her purpose, and I am totally too through with this crap... now people read that and think I am the one saying this stuff as if it were true.  Tomikasmom knows what she is doing when she does this and time and time again I have to come back and try to explain this and I am tired.   

SO FOR THE RECORD... anything I posted concerning what MARILYN LACHESTER was saying, I POSTED TO PROVE THE EXTENT OF HER LYING.  I NEVER POSTED THAT TO BE USED AS FACT AND CERTAINLY NOT TO BE USED AS A SOURCE FROM ME. 

I've bit my tongue so many times over this on here and have had to leave the board so many times and also not explain things so many times because of this because I was getting soooooo mad I knew I was going to become not a very nice person. 

so... I have posted this to tomikasmom, and I have to get off of here and if you read her posts, I its all BS, I am not the SOURCE of any of that BS she is quoting, and I am through coming here and reading her BS crap posts and trying to undo the misinformation she is putting out there. 

I dont have time for this crap, so if you don't see me here.  this is why.  Nice posting with all you other posters, I did really enjoy all the discussion and brainstorming etc.  But I can no longer deal with this crap at all.  I will be posting elsewhere where I can explain myself and no one comes along and snips and twists what I say and then quotes me as the source of their crap. 



I have posted this to tomikasmom...

I really would appreciate if you quit taking what I post out of context and using it as a source to try to prove what you think.  You have done that time and time again.

all the things I posted with regard to what I was TOLD were LIES FROM MARILYN LACHESTER.  I have always posted them as LIES... yet you take them out of context time and time again and use them as "your proof" and then you quote ME as the SOURCE of that info. 

Please quit doing that. 

Everything MARILYN has said or the info I have gotten that she said is a LIE.  I have stated that any time I have posted what she said, so if you are going to keep quoting that stuff don't be snipping it to look like I said that.


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3 7/28/09 -
Post by: Wyks on August 11, 2009, 06:53:49 PM
Good God!
I was trying to read all of those silly and distracting motions baez and lyin filed.They state they need to have the fraud case judged after the death penalty case because it's a well known fact that attys need anywhere from 500 hours to 1000 hours to prepare for the death penalty case.
So how long has lyin been on the case?
There are approx. 480 hours per month(working on case 8 hours a day,5 days a week).Death penalty brought back in April.....so we'll not even count April.4 months x 480 hours=1,920 hours and that's for baez and team and lyin and her crew combined.
So what's the big deal baez?You still have at least 5 months to go with 480 hours per month and you have already used about 1,920 hours working on this death penalty case!Idiot!
And you might get distracted with the fraud case?Sure that's the only reason you don't want the fraud case before the death penalty case?LOL
I swear someone has to stand up one of these day and just WHAUMP baez upside his head.

     ::MonkeyGavel:: ::MonkeyMad:: ::MonkeyGavel::



(http://i439.photobucket.com/albums/qq117/Wyks_/Caylee/judgespanks.gif)


 ::MonkeyHaHa::   ::MonkeyCool::


YEAH!Just like that lol
Good to see you Wyks.

Good to see you too Karma!  And yeah, lol, that pic actually was from way back in the Caylee threads, sent in by a monkey in response to something else from none other than Baez.  I see he is still being true to form. 

Sure do wish Washington had Florida's 'Sunshine Law'.  We'd likely get to know more about what LE knows in Lindsey's case.  Surely they know more than they are letting on. 


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3 7/28/09 -
Post by: Wyks on August 11, 2009, 06:55:53 PM
I don't believe that was the first time Lindsey was out alone, maybe without her phone, but not by herself.

Oh I agree!  Seems that Lindsey pretty much ran all over town, given what some folks there have said. 


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3 7/28/09 -
Post by: Tamikosmom on August 11, 2009, 07:11:23 PM
KARA KAMPEN - SWIMMING

KaraK
Re: Lindsey Baum, 10y missing from McCleary, WA 6/26/09
« Reply #1578 on: July 07, 2009, 10:37:19 PM »


I'm going to try and catch up I know that I missed some questions but there will be a delay - we have to meet friends at the park who will be releasing some B-day balloons for Lindsey.

The girls were swimming at the same home both days. At the time the girls were there it was 2 to 3 other girls (9 to 12), Lindsey, my daughter and the mother of one of the other girls (the mother to the child whose house they were at). - Hope that makes sense.

As for the argument: according to my daughter right now: it started at Shell station (this is where they left the bike) then they continued walking til they were on Maple (I know this was confused earlier possibly because I didn't understand what Kayla was saying) they were several houses down from mine when the family friend (who apparently was visiting a another friend on this street) told Josh to go home.    - Does that make sense? If not I'll try to make it clearer but I got to run but will come back and try to catch up on any ?'s.

http://scaredmonkeys.net/index.php?topic=5541.msg868953#msg868953
Thank you Janet!
I completely missed that they swan there 2 days.


You are welcome Grandma Karma..

I heard through the Monkey grapevine.

 ::MonkeyJnBox::

CONGRATULATIONS!!.

Janet

Thank you Janet
::::still beaming::::

Karma ... I am so happy for you!

 ::MonkeyCheer2::

I was going to say that it does not get any better but ... it does.  Enjoy ... seize the moments ...  hold them in your heart.  That precious little granddaugher you have been blessed with will grow so quickly and ... every stage will be a miracle.

God Bless

Janet


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3 7/28/09 -
Post by: Wyks on August 11, 2009, 07:19:37 PM
I did my catchup reading in this case, and while there were some jaw-dropping things found out, was happy to see so many monkeys catching things left and right.  Nearly all that I was wondering about was asked by someone and answers discovered.  Good job everyone! 

One thing I noticed in the discussions about Lindsey's myspace messages, is that she seems to have been posting quite a bit from her phone.  Many of the myspace messages that were posted here, from Lindsey, said "mobile" in the message.  And doesn't "mobile" mean those were posted from her phone?   At the time, IIRC, those who knew Lindsey weren't mentioning that she posted from her phone, and I wondered if either of the mother's were aware of that.   

Lindsey posting from her phone was mentioned in here a few times.   Some monkeys were wondering how the heck Lindsey had time to post on myspace, given what seems to be an awfully lot of things she was doing and places she had gone, the day she disappeared.  Am thinking that if Lindsey indeed was posting to myspace from her phone, there's the answer.  She could have been posting easily, while doing this and that and going here and there.  Could be why she had to charge her phone that evening and went out, forgetting it.  I dunno.  Just some thoughts. 

I think it was said that LE has Lindsey's phone.  Has it ever been reported by LE if her phone and phone records were cleared? 

I just have to wonder how much myspace and/or Lindsey's phone may have to do with her disappearance. 

Sigh..  It's sooooo sad!!!   ::MonkeyNoNo::   ::MonkeyWaa::



Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3 7/28/09 -
Post by: Wyks on August 11, 2009, 07:25:31 PM
DD -

I hope you don't go!  Am hoping that you'll stay in here and continue with your research!  You have an amazing gift, and seems to me that this case needs your help.  I do understand your frustrations, and am hoping that you can just take a break if you need one, and come back ready to roll. 


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3 7/28/09 -
Post by: KarmaRoundUp on August 11, 2009, 07:25:54 PM
Good God!
I was trying to read all of those silly and distracting motions baez and lyin filed.They state they need to have the fraud case judged after the death penalty case because it's a well known fact that attys need anywhere from 500 hours to 1000 hours to prepare for the death penalty case.
So how long has lyin been on the case?
There are approx. 480 hours per month(working on case 8 hours a day,5 days a week).Death penalty brought back in April.....so we'll not even count April.4 months x 480 hours=1,920 hours and that's for baez and team and lyin and her crew combined.
So what's the big deal baez?You still have at least 5 months to go with 480 hours per month and you have already used about 1,920 hours working on this death penalty case!Idiot!
And you might get distracted with the fraud case?Sure that's the only reason you don't want the fraud case before the death penalty case?LOL
I swear someone has to stand up one of these day and just WHAUMP baez upside his head.

     ::MonkeyGavel:: ::MonkeyMad:: ::MonkeyGavel::



(http://i439.photobucket.com/albums/qq117/Wyks_/Caylee/judgespanks.gif)


 ::MonkeyHaHa::   ::MonkeyCool::


YEAH!Just like that lol
Good to see you Wyks.

Good to see you too Karma!  And yeah, lol, that pic actually was from way back in the Caylee threads, sent in by a monkey in response to something else from none other than Baez.  I see he is still being true to form. 

Sure do wish Washington had Florida's 'Sunshine Law'.  We'd likely get to know more about what LE knows in Lindsey's case.  Surely they know more than they are letting on. 

I'm hoping they have more than what it seems they have.I'm trying my best not to get all pessimistic but it is looking like LE doesn't have any more than they had the day Lindsey disappeared.We haven't even had a media update in days and days.
I'm still praying for Lindsey.


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3 7/28/09 -
Post by: KarmaRoundUp on August 11, 2009, 07:27:50 PM
KARA KAMPEN - SWIMMING

KaraK
Re: Lindsey Baum, 10y missing from McCleary, WA 6/26/09
« Reply #1578 on: July 07, 2009, 10:37:19 PM »


I'm going to try and catch up I know that I missed some questions but there will be a delay - we have to meet friends at the park who will be releasing some B-day balloons for Lindsey.

The girls were swimming at the same home both days. At the time the girls were there it was 2 to 3 other girls (9 to 12), Lindsey, my daughter and the mother of one of the other girls (the mother to the child whose house they were at). - Hope that makes sense.

As for the argument: according to my daughter right now: it started at Shell station (this is where they left the bike) then they continued walking til they were on Maple (I know this was confused earlier possibly because I didn't understand what Kayla was saying) they were several houses down from mine when the family friend (who apparently was visiting a another friend on this street) told Josh to go home.    - Does that make sense? If not I'll try to make it clearer but I got to run but will come back and try to catch up on any ?'s.

http://scaredmonkeys.net/index.php?topic=5541.msg868953#msg868953
Thank you Janet!
I completely missed that they swan there 2 days.


You are welcome Grandma Karma..

I heard through the Monkey grapevine.

 ::MonkeyJnBox::

CONGRATULATIONS!!.

Janet

Thank you Janet
::::still beaming::::

Karma ... I am so happy for you!

 ::MonkeyCheer2::

I was going to say that it does not get any better but ... it does.  Enjoy ... seize the moments ...  hold them in your heart.  That precious little granddaugher you have been blessed with will grow so quickly and ... every stage will be a miracle.

God Bless

Janet

Thank you Janet.Evie is my 4th grand daughter and they do sprout up like weeds lol    ::MonkeyJnBox::


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3 7/28/09 -
Post by: KarmaRoundUp on August 11, 2009, 07:31:04 PM
I did my catchup reading in this case, and while there were some jaw-dropping things found out, was happy to see so many monkeys catching things left and right.  Nearly all that I was wondering about was asked by someone and answers discovered.  Good job everyone! 

One thing I noticed in the discussions about Lindsey's myspace messages, is that she seems to have been posting quite a bit from her phone.  Many of the myspace messages that were posted here, from Lindsey, said "mobile" in the message.  And doesn't "mobile" mean those were posted from her phone?   At the time, IIRC, those who knew Lindsey weren't mentioning that she posted from her phone, and I wondered if either of the mother's were aware of that.   

Lindsey posting from her phone was mentioned in here a few times.   Some monkeys were wondering how the heck Lindsey had time to post on myspace, given what seems to be an awfully lot of things she was doing and places she had gone, the day she disappeared.  Am thinking that if Lindsey indeed was posting to myspace from her phone, there's the answer.  She could have been posting easily, while doing this and that and going here and there.  Could be why she had to charge her phone that evening and went out, forgetting it.  I dunno.  Just some thoughts. 

I think it was said that LE has Lindsey's phone.  Has it ever been reported by LE if her phone and phone records were cleared? 

I just have to wonder how much myspace and/or Lindsey's phone may have to do with her disappearance. 

Sigh..  It's sooooo sad!!!   ::MonkeyNoNo::   ::MonkeyWaa::


Wyks,from KaraK's posts(Lindsey's friend's Mama)she said neither girl had internet access from their phones.I also thought those messages looked like from her phone.


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3 7/28/09 -
Post by: klaasend on August 11, 2009, 07:36:31 PM
I want DD and Tamikosmom to work it out.  Janet, I trust your research but I also trust what DD is saying.  I can't make everyone agree or get along.


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3 7/28/09 -
Post by: sunshine12 on August 11, 2009, 07:38:15 PM
DD -

I hope you don't go!  Am hoping that you'll stay in here and continue with your research!  You have an amazing gift, and seems to me that this case needs your help.  I do understand your frustrations, and am hoping that you can just take a break if you need one, and come back ready to roll. 


yes dd please dont go. lindsey needs you and the research you do has generated good thoughts in a lot of us. please don't let one person get you down. maybe this could be reported to a moderator?


i really think mlachester should be questioned about her wherabouts the night lb went missing...i'd also like to dig deeper into the people who are friends w/mlachester that live in the home lb was swimming in the day she went missing.  this is just all so strange to me. i wish i knew where to begin. it's sad knowing what a sick world we live in


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3 7/28/09 -
Post by: Leroy on August 11, 2009, 07:39:36 PM
I want DD and Tamikosmom to work it out.  Janet, I trust your research but I also trust what DD is saying.  I can't make everyone agree or get along.

I want them to as well.  I respect both of them so much...each in their individual way of putting things in perspective. 



Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3 7/28/09 -
Post by: no rose colored glasses on August 11, 2009, 07:41:46 PM
DD -

I hope you don't go!  Am hoping that you'll stay in here and continue with your research!  You have an amazing gift, and seems to me that this case needs your help.  I do understand your frustrations, and am hoping that you can just take a break if you need one, and come back ready to roll. 

I agree, please don't go we appreciate all that you are doing.  ::MonkeyCool::


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3 7/28/09 -
Post by: no rose colored glasses on August 11, 2009, 07:43:38 PM
DD -

I hope you don't go!  Am hoping that you'll stay in here and continue with your research!  You have an amazing gift, and seems to me that this case needs your help.  I do understand your frustrations, and am hoping that you can just take a break if you need one, and come back ready to roll. 


yes dd please dont go. lindsey needs you and the research you do has generated good thoughts in a lot of us. please don't let one person get you down. maybe this could be reported to a moderator?


i really think mlachester should be questioned about her wherabouts the night lb went missing...i'd also like to dig deeper into the people who are friends w/mlachester that live in the home lb was swimming in the day she went missing.  this is just all so strange to me. i wish i knew where to begin. it's sad knowing what a sick world we live in
I would like to know this also, all very weird.


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3 7/28/09 -
Post by: Wyks on August 11, 2009, 08:00:31 PM
    
Re: Lindsey Baum, 10y missing from McCleary, WA 6/26/09
« Reply #491 on: July 01, 2009, 09:07:32 PM »
   
Quote from: Sister on July 01, 2009, 08:40:04 PM
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/GraysHarborOccultists/

DD, I read this site much earlier today and maybe my memory is foggy, but there was a comment about going into the forest and not enough people are some such thing.  I hate it when I don't save stuff.

Re: [GraysHarborOccultists] Re: HERBS AND THINGS


Dear Ada,

 As far as I know the campout at Twin Harbors State Park on the weekend of the 18th-20

is going to be on the beach side #291 site. Pagans from Aberdeen and surrounding area,

only going to be a fmaybe 10 there. If interested check with Anita/Hedamoon..to reserve a place or you can just drop by for the day...very informal,no rits scheduled..Would love to see you again...Hope all is well in your world and looking forward to checking out your shop.gylan


SEES WITHIN

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

I found the above post at http://scaredmonkeys.net/index.php?topic=5541.msg861010#msg861010 (http://scaredmonkeys.net/index.php?topic=5541.msg861010#msg861010)  in Lindsey's 1st thread.  It's about a group that's in the area that was found, and I do think it bears some looking into.  There was some discussion about this, but I think a comment made in the above info was overlooked, and I want to bring your attention back to it. 

In this yahoo group, it appears that members (pagans or ?) are talking about a campout that was to be held at Twin Harbors State Park, (the weekend before Lindsey disappeared).   The person who originally wrote this message mentions above that the campout was to be "very informal,no rits scheduled...."

This totally jumped out at me, and I wonder... do any of you realize what this is saying????   ::MonkeyEek::   ::MonkeyShocked::

------>>>>   "rits" is short form for rituals   <<<<---------

The person is telling the other that no rituals were scheduled for the campout that weekend.  Which makes me wonder..........  Where and when are their rituals scheduled?   

For those who know me, who have read my posts in other cases, esp the Cantu thread, you'll remember that I do have personal knowledge of these kind of rituals.   And have plenty of info in my website on ritual abuse. 

What brought me to Lindsey's case, is that she is a young missing girl.... in western Washington....  not too far away from where I was born and raised, and experienced ritual abuse for 5 years.. in southwestern Washington. 

These folks (young and old) who go missing 'without a trace'.. in this area....    There IS a reason.  There ARE occultists/satanists alive and well, IN THAT AREA, who take adults and kids right off the street.  Gone... without a trace.  And the purpose is for their rituals.  I know this.  I've been there, experienced that. 

IMO, along with the other possibilities in Lindsey's case, groups such as the one found above bear looking into. 


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3 7/28/09 -
Post by: Tamikosmom on August 11, 2009, 08:01:11 PM
I want DD and Tamikosmom to work it out.  Janet, I trust your research but I also trust what DD is saying.  I can't make everyone agree or get along.

Klaas.

DD and I are not on the same page.  Hey ... I am not on the same page as the majority of Monkeys on this thread who side with DD in regards to many of the issues encompassing the Lindsey Baum case.  Story of my life (LOL).  We are on different path in search of answers regarding the disappearance of this little girl and ... that is OK with me.

I am taking AZSunny's advise and ... I am posting on the THEORIES AND TIMELINES thread another thread so as not to be a distraction on the main thread.

Janet

++++++


Fanny Mae,
McCleary did not have a 4th of July celebration/parade.  Need to have your facts straight.  And you can't know the attitude & sadness of a town unless you are here.

Heidismom

Do you have a personal connection to the Baum family?

Thank you

Janet
No, I don't, just great compassion for them for what they are going through.  I also feel so badly for Josh as he faces his teen & adult years with challenges that are not anyone's fault.

What has been revealed in regards to the various troubling issues encompassing Josh Baum ... I too feel for this young man.  Nevertheless ... considering the heated argument just prior to his sister's disappearance ... the heated argument that dictated intervention by a family friend ... Josh Baum must be considered a person of interest until eliminated by LE.  In the name of justice for Lindsey Baum ... no person of interest should be given a free pass.

Heidismom ... thank you for responding.

Janet

Janet, I strongly agree with you on this.  If we cannot consider or discuss Josh, the only one fighting with Lindsey that last day, then we have no reason to be here.  The reasons given for not looking at him are not compelling to me.    A moment of uncontrolled rage and a little help with cleanup is all it would have required for Josh to be involved.   Feeling sorry for Josh is not the point here; finding Lindsey is.   

Chi-M



Chi, I don't think anyone said we were not considering Josh or that it couldn't be discussed, or that investigations on his background are not important. It doesn't mean that we can't focus on other issues, and not dedicate the whole thread to one suspect.  When page after page is covered on one issue, we lose focus on all the other suspects and circumstances. 

 Do I personally think Josh was involved, NO...I don't think he is mentally capable or focused enough to have done this by himself. Maybe the focus should be who may have helped him?  Not his mother as she has taken a poly and passed.  Perhaps there should be a separate thread just to discuss Josh.  Would that keep everyone happy??



Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3 7/28/09 -
Post by: rebelgirl901 on August 11, 2009, 08:01:25 PM
DD -

I hope you don't go!  Am hoping that you'll stay in here and continue with your research!  You have an amazing gift, and seems to me that this case needs your help.  I do understand your frustrations, and am hoping that you can just take a break if you need one, and come back ready to roll. 


DD I agree...Please don't go...I really enjoy your research & respect what you are doing.  I believe what you are saying and I think MOST of us know that ML is a liar and can't be trusted.  I understand your frustration about your comments/posts being taken out of context but PLEASE don't leave.  You have so much valuable information concerning this case, things that others don't have. We all want Lindsey to come home, that's why we are here, for Lindsey. 

Please at least think about it before you make your final decision.

Thanks for everything you do, it is much appreciated.


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3 7/28/09 -
Post by: Sister on August 11, 2009, 08:03:05 PM
I want DD and Tamikosmom to work it out.  Janet, I trust your research but I also trust what DD is saying.  I can't make everyone agree or get along.

Klaas, I appreciate your patience and insight.  I have been working with DD for some time now and I can assure you her thoughts come from her research and the work of a trusted team that checks and double checks our work.  Muffy has at the bottom of her name about having a right to your opinion, but not a right to the facts.  The facts are the facts.  For a researcher to have their hard work intentionally twisted is more than disheartening and discouraging.  It becomes a lie.  Then to be misquoted over and over after having asked not to be, well, that's when the tempers flare, particularly when it is perceived to be done willfully to merely cause a rise or to be cute.  To give researchers the admonition to "think about it" when hours, days, and weeks are being spent thinking, pondering and praying when it is the same thing over and over is an insult.  What makes this worse, having to spend time saying "I didn't say that" or "you are misquoting me" again and again, takes away precious time from bring these victims home or having justice prevail.
It is just my opinion, but if DD doesn't want a particular person to quote her work because it is taken out of context, I think that should be respected.  But again, you have the insight which is honored.
Thank you for letting me sound off.
Sister


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3 7/28/09 -
Post by: no rose colored glasses on August 11, 2009, 08:09:49 PM
That is very, very interesting Wyks  ::MonkeyEek::


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3 7/28/09 -
Post by: Tamikosmom on August 11, 2009, 08:10:37 PM
I want DD and Tamikosmom to work it out.  Janet, I trust your research but I also trust what DD is saying.  I can't make everyone agree or get along.

Klaas, I appreciate your patience and insight.  I have been working with DD for some time now and I can assure you her thoughts come from her research and the work of a trusted team that checks and double checks our work.  Muffy has at the bottom of her name about having a right to your opinion, but not a right to the facts.  The facts are the facts.  For a researcher to have their hard work intentionally twisted is more than disheartening and discouraging.  It becomes a lie.  Then to be misquoted over and over after having asked not to be, well, that's when the tempers flare, particularly when it is perceived to be done willfully to merely cause a rise or to be cute.  To give researchers the admonition to "think about it" when hours, days, and weeks are being spent thinking, pondering and praying when it is the same thing over and over is an insult.  What makes this worse, having to spend time saying "I didn't say that" or "you are misquoting me" again and again, takes away precious time from bring these victims home or having justice prevail.
It is just my opinion, but if DD doesn't want a particular person to quote her work because it is taken out of context, I think that should be respected.  But again, you have the insight which is honored.
Thank you for letting me sound off.
Sister


Sister

Please link to one post of DD's that I have taken out of context.  Please back up your  allegations of "intentionally twisting".  I link every quote I post to the source to avoid any misunderstanding.

Janet



Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3 7/28/09 -
Post by: Sister on August 11, 2009, 08:18:25 PM
   
Re: Lindsey Baum, 10y missing from McCleary, WA 6/26/09
« Reply #491 on: July 01, 2009, 09:07:32 PM »
   
Quote from: Sister on July 01, 2009, 08:40:04 PM
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/GraysHarborOccultists/

DD, I read this site much earlier today and maybe my memory is foggy, but there was a comment about going into the forest and not enough people are some such thing.  I hate it when I don't save stuff.

Re: [GraysHarborOccultists] Re: HERBS AND THINGS


Dear Ada,

 As far as I know the campout at Twin Harbors State Park on the weekend of the 18th-20

is going to be on the beach side #291 site. Pagans from Aberdeen and surrounding area,

only going to be a fmaybe 10 there. If interested check with Anita/Hedamoon..to reserve a place or you can just drop by for the day...very informal,no rits scheduled..Would love to see you again...Hope all is well in your world and looking forward to checking out your shop.gylan


SEES WITHIN

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

I found the above post at http://scaredmonkeys.net/index.php?topic=5541.msg861010#msg861010 (http://scaredmonkeys.net/index.php?topic=5541.msg861010#msg861010)  in Lindsey's 1st thread.  It's about a group that's in the area that was found, and I do think it bears some looking into.  There was some discussion about this, but I think a comment made in the above info was overlooked, and I want to bring your attention back to it. 

In this yahoo group, it appears that members (pagans or ?) are talking about a campout that was to be held at Twin Harbors State Park, (the weekend before Lindsey disappeared).   The person who originally wrote this message mentions above that the campout was to be "very informal,no rits scheduled...."

This totally jumped out at me, and I wonder... do any of you realize what this is saying????   ::MonkeyEek::   ::MonkeyShocked::

------>>>>   "rits" is short form for rituals   <<<<---------

The person is telling the other that no rituals were scheduled for the campout that weekend.  Which makes me wonder..........  Where and when are their rituals scheduled?   

For those who know me, who have read my posts in other cases, esp the Cantu thread, you'll remember that I do have personal knowledge of these kind of rituals.   And have plenty of info in my website on ritual abuse. 

What brought me to Lindsey's case, is that she is a young missing girl.... in western Washington....  not too far away from where I was born and raised, and experienced ritual abuse for 5 years.. in southwestern Washington. 

These folks (young and old) who go missing 'without a trace'.. in this area....    There IS a reason.  There ARE occultists/satanists alive and well, IN THAT AREA, who take adults and kids right off the street.  Gone... without a trace.  And the purpose is for their rituals.  I know this.  I've been there, experienced that. 

IMO, along with the other possibilities in Lindsey's case, groups such as the one found above bear looking into. 


Wyks, there is another thread here about Weird Things, etc.  I know you've been reading for hours, but that might help.  Looking forward to your questions.


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3 7/28/09 -
Post by: trimmonthelake on August 11, 2009, 08:28:18 PM
Karma  ::MonkeyDevil::  I think I just read that in Caylee's thread.

Me too NoRose...  I thought I was really losing it this time   ::MonkeyHaHa:: 

I was panicking.   ::MonkeyHaHa::


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3 7/28/09 -
Post by: no rose colored glasses on August 11, 2009, 08:29:39 PM
Karma  ::MonkeyDevil::  I think I just read that in Caylee's thread.

Me too NoRose...  I thought I was really losing it this time   ::MonkeyHaHa:: 

I was panicking.   ::MonkeyHaHa::
I was afraid I was really confused  ::MonkeyEek::  ::MonkeyDevil::


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3 7/28/09 -
Post by: Wyks on August 11, 2009, 08:32:12 PM
I'm hoping they have more than what it seems they have.I'm trying my best not to get all pessimistic but it is looking like LE doesn't have any more than they had the day Lindsey disappeared.We haven't even had a media update in days and days.
I'm still praying for Lindsey.

Am praying for her too, Karma.  It IS frustrating when it seems that LE has nothing, and the media reports slow down to a crawl.  Seems as tho the case is being allowed to go cold.  It's times like this that we have to hope there are things going on in the background that LE is just keeping close to the vest, not talking about.  The waiting is so very hard.  I surely don't want the case jeopardized by LE telling what they've got, if they've got some info, and yet.... when it seems they have nothing, I just want to scream!  Especially when from our angle it seems so much "could be" worked on, yet we have no clue if it has been or not.  Sigh.



Wyks,from KaraK's posts(Lindsey's friend's Mama)she said neither girl had internet access from their phones.I also thought those messages looked like from her phone.

Thanks for letting me know, Karma!  If neither of the girls were posting from a phone, then am wondering why the myspace messages would say 'mobile' on them?  Wish I knew more about how myspace works and what some things mean.   


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3 7/28/09 -
Post by: Wyks on August 11, 2009, 08:36:19 PM

Wyks, there is another thread here about Weird Things, etc.  I know you've been reading for hours, but that might help.  Looking forward to your questions.

Thanks Sister, I'll check it out.   ::MonkeyWink:: 


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3 7/28/09 -
Post by: Wyks on August 11, 2009, 08:38:09 PM
That is very, very interesting Wyks  ::MonkeyEek::

Yep, and I hope that LE is on top of it.  Sadly tho..  ::MonkeyNoNo::  I doubt it. 



Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3 7/28/09 -
Post by: JessStar on August 11, 2009, 09:45:48 PM
O/T:  I know this is off topic, but since this Cage has been generating a lot of activity lately, I wanted to let y'all know that the Melissa Huckaby's has been called to court on Monday, August 17th at 1:00.  Prosecution filed a motion to move the Sept. date up--LOOKS LIKE WE GOT AN INDICTMENT MONKEYS! 

Check out Sandra's Cage for the articles.  YES YES YES!

JUSTICE FOR SANDRA!      ::MonkeyCheer4::


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3 7/28/09 -
Post by: no rose colored glasses on August 11, 2009, 09:52:47 PM
O/T:  I know this is off topic, but since this Cage has been generating a lot of activity lately, I wanted to let y'all know that the Melissa Huckaby's has been called to court on Monday, August 17th at 1:00.  Prosecution filed a motion to move the Sept. date up--LOOKS LIKE WE GOT AN INDICTMENT MONKEYS! 

Check out Sandra's Cage for the articles.  YES YES YES!

JUSTICE FOR SANDRA!      ::MonkeyCheer4::
Great news  ::MonkeyCheer3::


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3 7/28/09 -
Post by: Sister on August 11, 2009, 09:57:56 PM
o/t - Northern Rose, I have a question posted in the Cantu thread (Blink's thread).


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3 7/28/09 -
Post by: melisb on August 12, 2009, 07:37:33 AM
Hi Wyks!  Most don't know me and I rarely post but in answer to your MySpace question, LB may not have had mobile access through HER phone but if it says mobile it is.  She is probably using a phone belonging to someone with mobile web access.  I know of no other way to do this.  You might want to bring that to LE's attention as it seems to be a Mayberry type set up.  Pardon that, I know they are trying but as I understand it they only have a team of three.  I hope that was just somebody yuking it up.  DD please don't go, we count on your expertise in tracking things down for some of us computer illiterate (speaking only for myself).  You present different options backed by fact and that is appreciated and needed when rumors are running rampant.  I know we all have been guilty of passing on rumors accidentally when stated by a respected poster or speculation by media.  It is not malicious or intended and usually cleared up quickly.  Sometimes we forget that a high percentage of posts are in our opinion and to be thought provoking and to bounce ideas of each other.  Let's all be respectful and remember we are here only for Lindsey and to help her come home!  Ok, that is all my brain can muster up this morning and I'm rambling so off I go back in the corner, lurking, waiting to hear from all the beautiful, intelligent Monkey minds!  Have a wonderful day and think before anyone does anything in haste!


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3 7/28/09 -
Post by: no rose colored glasses on August 12, 2009, 09:37:21 AM
melisb  agreed   ::MonkeyCool::


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3 7/28/09 -
Post by: KarmaRoundUp on August 12, 2009, 11:55:07 AM
Good afternoon you all.


http://www.theolympian.com/377/story/936545.html?storylink=omni_popular

Multiple sex offenders released in Thurston and Mason counties

 ::MonkeyMad::




Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3 7/28/09 -
Post by: no rose colored glasses on August 12, 2009, 12:03:57 PM
Good afternoon you all.


http://www.theolympian.com/377/story/936545.html?storylink=omni_popular

Multiple sex offenders released in Thurston and Mason counties

 ::MonkeyMad::



Awful  ::MonkeyNoNo::  I just don't know what to think about this case anymore, I have several different scenarios, and I just don't know  ::MonkeyConfused::


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3 7/28/09 -
Post by: no rose colored glasses on August 12, 2009, 01:28:49 PM
I sure wish we would get some info, any info, I'm afraid LE doesn't have anything.


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3 7/28/09 -
Post by: KarmaRoundUp on August 12, 2009, 01:50:46 PM
I sure wish we would get some info, any info, I'm afraid LE doesn't have anything.
I sure hope they have more than what we have.   ::MonkeyWaa::


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3 7/28/09 -
Post by: Tamikosmom on August 12, 2009, 02:39:29 PM
Does any Monkeys know if it illegal for the police interrogate a minor?

Janet


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3 7/28/09 -
Post by: KarmaRoundUp on August 12, 2009, 02:46:52 PM
Does any Monkeys know if it illegal for the police interrogate a minor?

Janet
I don't know about interrogating a minor but I would think they could question them if needed.


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3 7/28/09 -
Post by: Tamikosmom on August 12, 2009, 02:56:16 PM
Does any Monkeys know if it illegal for the police interrogate a minor?

Janet
I don't know about interrogating a minor but I would think they could question them if needed.

Thanks Karma

There are legal eagles on the forum who may be able to shed some light on this issue.

It dawned on me that even with parental permission the questioning of a minor who may unknowingly be implicating himself/herself in a crime may be in someway infringing on his/her rights.  Therefore ... anything revealed by that minor may not be used in against him/her.

Janet



Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3 7/28/09 -
Post by: Tamikosmom on August 12, 2009, 03:14:49 PM
Good afternoon you all.


http://www.theolympian.com/377/story/936545.html?storylink=omni_popular

Multiple sex offenders released in Thurston and Mason counties

 ::MonkeyMad::




Karma ... when will the rights of our precious children to be protected from these preying  monsters be given priority.

::MonkeyMad::

Janet

 


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3 7/28/09 -
Post by: no rose colored glasses on August 12, 2009, 03:28:14 PM
A parent or guardian has to be in the room with anykind of questioning of a minor.


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3 7/28/09 -
Post by: Sister on August 12, 2009, 03:31:52 PM
I sure wish we would get some info, any info, I'm afraid LE doesn't have anything.
I sure hope they have more than what we have.   ::MonkeyWaa::

Karma and No Rose -- I think they have more than they are revealing.  Unlike Florida with its Sunshine Laws, this waiting patiently can become nerve racking.  I do, however, believe they have more, a lot more.  I don't think they are as incompetent as some have asserted, I think they are keeping things close to the chest.  JMHO  And I do know for a fact that some of the info obtained here from research has been shared with them.  I only wish there was more public support in the community to bring Linesey home.


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3 7/28/09 -
Post by: KarmaRoundUp on August 12, 2009, 03:42:05 PM
Good afternoon you all.


http://www.theolympian.com/377/story/936545.html?storylink=omni_popular

Multiple sex offenders released in Thurston and Mason counties

 ::MonkeyMad::




Karma ... when will the rights of our precious children to be protected from these preying  monsters be given priority.

::MonkeyMad::

Janet

 
I don't know but I have a feeling it will be when they kill all the monsters on our earth.


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3 7/28/09 -
Post by: no rose colored glasses on August 12, 2009, 03:45:44 PM
I sure wish we would get some info, any info, I'm afraid LE doesn't have anything.
I sure hope they have more than what we have.   ::MonkeyWaa::

Karma and No Rose -- I think they have more than they are revealing.  Unlike Florida with its Sunshine Laws, this waiting patiently can become nerve racking.  I do, however, believe they have more, a lot more.  I don't think they are as incompetent as some have asserted, I think they are keeping things close to the chest.  JMHO  And I do know for a fact that some of the info obtained here from research has been shared with them.  I only wish there was more public support in the community to bring Linesey home.
Thanks for that info. I sure wish also there was more public support  ::MonkeyNoNo::


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3 7/28/09 -
Post by: KarmaRoundUp on August 12, 2009, 03:50:51 PM
I sure wish we would get some info, any info, I'm afraid LE doesn't have anything.
I sure hope they have more than what we have.   ::MonkeyWaa::

Karma and No Rose -- I think they have more than they are revealing.  Unlike Florida with its Sunshine Laws, this waiting patiently can become nerve racking.  I do, however, believe they have more, a lot more.  I don't think they are as incompetent as some have asserted, I think they are keeping things close to the chest.  JMHO  And I do know for a fact that some of the info obtained here from research has been shared with them.  I only wish there was more public support in the community to bring Linesey home.
I hope you are right.I'm not saying the LE are incompetent,I'm just not sure they have much to go on.I wonder if Melissa and KaraK know they have to try their hardest to keep Lindsey's name and face out there?They did have some woman from a search center place there in McCleary and I wonder what happened to her?Blonde lady,was at the last vigil.They should be holding vigils every week.


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3 7/28/09 -
Post by: no rose colored glasses on August 12, 2009, 03:55:44 PM
Since they can't find a spot for a search center, maybe Melissa could out of her home?


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3 7/28/09 -
Post by: KarmaRoundUp on August 12, 2009, 03:56:33 PM
I "found"a new image of Lindsey today,I wonder if we can get Brandi to make this into a nice tag.



                         ::MonkeyHeart:: ::MonkeyHeart:: ::MonkeyHeart::



Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3 7/28/09 -
Post by: KarmaRoundUp on August 12, 2009, 03:59:03 PM
Since they can't find a spot for a search center, maybe Melissa could out of her home?
I agree,ah heck.....do it out of anyone's home or parking lot or trailor or something.It's been so dang long.


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3 7/28/09 -
Post by: no rose colored glasses on August 12, 2009, 04:00:58 PM
Since they can't find a spot for a search center, maybe Melissa could out of her home?
I agree,ah heck.....do it out of anyone's home or parking lot or trailor or something.It's been so dang long.
That is such a cute pic of Lindsey, I just can't get over how she looks like one of the little girls in my neighborhood  ::MonkeyEek:: There is no reason why, unless there is some law, that she couldn't run a search center out of her home.


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3 7/28/09 -
Post by: KarmaRoundUp on August 12, 2009, 04:04:10 PM
Since they can't find a spot for a search center, maybe Melissa could out of her home?
I agree,ah heck.....do it out of anyone's home or parking lot or trailor or something.It's been so dang long.
That is such a cute pic of Lindsey, I just can't get over how she looks like one of the little girls in my neighborhood  ::MonkeyEek:: There is no reason why, unless there is some law, that she couldn't run a search center out of her home.
She looks like a sweet little girl.There may be regulations or something but at "**"some of the locals there have been saying they see no missing fliers of Lindsey in the nearby towns.
If I lived close to them I would help them,print out fliers and take them to other towns.SO's like to move around a lot.


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3 7/28/09 -
Post by: Sister on August 12, 2009, 04:25:52 PM
I sure wish we would get some info, any info, I'm afraid LE doesn't have anything.
I sure hope they have more than what we have.   ::MonkeyWaa::

Karma and No Rose -- I think they have more than they are revealing.  Unlike Florida with its Sunshine Laws, this waiting patiently can become nerve racking.  I do, however, believe they have more, a lot more.  I don't think they are as incompetent as some have asserted, I think they are keeping things close to the chest.  JMHO  And I do know for a fact that some of the info obtained here from research has been shared with them.  I only wish there was more public support in the community to bring Linesey home.
I hope you are right.I'm not saying the LE are incompetent,I'm just not sure they have much to go on.I wonder if Melissa and KaraK know they have to try their hardest to keep Lindsey's name and face out there?They did have some woman from a search center place there in McCleary and I wonder what happened to her?Blonde lady,was at the last vigil.They should be holding vigils every week.

Karma, they had been provided a space with phone lines, etc. but it was taken back.  I don't think the Baums have the resouces to do posters, etc.  And it needs to be organized, etc.  It really is a pity, but, as we all know and are so sensitive to, a little girl's safe return can depend upon it.  Because of limited resources, I heard members of LE are volunteering their time and they do have a space about 10 miles away.


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3 7/28/09 -
Post by: Tamikosmom on August 12, 2009, 04:27:00 PM
I "found"a new image of Lindsey today,I wonder if we can get Brandi to make this into a nice tag.



                         ::MonkeyHeart:: ::MonkeyHeart:: ::MonkeyHeart::


Lindsey really is a sweetheart.  Melissa Baum was so blessed.

Karma ... thank you for sharing.

Janet


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3 7/28/09 -
Post by: Wyks on August 12, 2009, 04:27:48 PM
Hi Wyks!  Most don't know me and I rarely post but in answer to your MySpace question, LB may not have had mobile access through HER phone but if it says mobile it is.  She is probably using a phone belonging to someone with mobile web access.  I know of no other way to do this.  You might want to bring that to LE's attention as it seems to be a Mayberry type set up.  Pardon that, I know they are trying but as I understand it they only have a team of three.  I hope that was just somebody yuking it up.  DD please don't go, we count on your expertise in tracking things down for some of us computer illiterate (speaking only for myself).  You present different options backed by fact and that is appreciated and needed when rumors are running rampant.  I know we all have been guilty of passing on rumors accidentally when stated by a respected poster or speculation by media.  It is not malicious or intended and usually cleared up quickly.  Sometimes we forget that a high percentage of posts are in our opinion and to be thought provoking and to bounce ideas of each other.  Let's all be respectful and remember we are here only for Lindsey and to help her come home!  Ok, that is all my brain can muster up this morning and I'm rambling so off I go back in the corner, lurking, waiting to hear from all the beautiful, intelligent Monkey minds!  Have a wonderful day and think before anyone does anything in haste!

Thanks melisb, I'll give LE there a call, just in case they haven't noticed it.   ::MonkeyCool::



Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3 7/28/09 -
Post by: sherip on August 12, 2009, 04:36:47 PM
I "found"a new image of Lindsey today,I wonder if we can get Brandi to make this into a nice tag.



                         ::MonkeyHeart:: ::MonkeyHeart:: ::MonkeyHeart::



I really like that photo of Lindsey, she looks so happy.  Is this photo ok for anyone to use for printing purposes?  I emailed the lindsey baum center today to ask if they would like a couple of really long plastic banners printed to hang from the overpass at the McCleary exit out on on the highway (I am waiting for a response) - I am hoping this is something that would appeal to them and that it is something that would be allowed by the State DOT or the Grays Harbor Co. Highway Dept.  I had to drive from Olympia to Aberdeen today and it occurred to me driving thru there that there is nothing visible alerting people who may not even know she is missing.

I also drove thru McCleary just to look and did not see any type of center or signs about Lindsey there either.  How heartbreaking for Melissa Baum, she must feel so helpless and alone right now, I cannot even imagine her pain over this.

I have a family member that has a banner business and I am willing to purchase a couple of them if they can be used and  I would like to put this photo of Lindsey on it if you dont mind.  Please let me know.  I sure wish I would have thought of this earlier.

Thanks


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3 7/28/09 -
Post by: no rose colored glasses on August 12, 2009, 04:40:52 PM
I "found"a new image of Lindsey today,I wonder if we can get Brandi to make this into a nice tag.



                         ::MonkeyHeart:: ::MonkeyHeart:: ::MonkeyHeart::



I really like that photo of Lindsey, she looks so happy.  Is this photo ok for anyone to use for printing purposes?  I emailed the lindsey baum center today to ask if they would like a couple of really long plastic banners printed to hang from the overpass at the McCleary exit out on on the highway (I am waiting for a response) - I am hoping this is something that would appeal to them and that it is something that would be allowed by the State DOT or the Grays Harbor Co. Highway Dept.  I had to drive from Olympia to Aberdeen today and it occurred to me driving thru there that there is nothing visible alerting people who may not even know she is missing.

I also drove thru McCleary just to look and did not see any type of center or signs about Lindsey there either.  How heartbreaking for Melissa Baum, she must feel so helpless and alone right now, I cannot even imagine her pain over this.

I have a family member that has a banner business and I am willing to purchase a couple of them if they can be used and  I would like to put this photo of Lindsey on it if you dont mind.  Please let me know.  I sure wish I would have thought of this earlier.

Thanks
That's wonderful  ::MonkeyAngel::  No signs of Lindsey anywhere  ::MonkeyNoNo::


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3 7/28/09 -
Post by: JessStar on August 12, 2009, 04:55:33 PM
Does any Monkeys know if it illegal for the police interrogate a minor?

Janet

This is a very complex question because of the use of the term "interrogate."  That has a very specific meaning.  Let me answer your question this way.  Full Custodial Interrogation of a minor outside of the juvenile justice system is generally impermissible.  However, the police are certainly allowed to question a minor whom they believe may have committed a crime.  And if the child makes an admission against interest (i.e., a confession), it's just as binding as if an adult made it.  In other words, police may delay turning a juvenile over to juvenile authorities or to his/her family in order to ask the child some questions, but they cannot use delay or prolonged exploratory questioning to enhance the compulsion inherent in in-custody interrogations.  Of course, Miranda applies if the interrogation is custodial.

Does that answer your question?


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3 7/28/09 -
Post by: JessStar on August 12, 2009, 04:58:39 PM
I "found"a new image of Lindsey today,I wonder if we can get Brandi to make this into a nice tag.



                         ::MonkeyHeart:: ::MonkeyHeart:: ::MonkeyHeart::



What a cute picture of Lindsey.  I pray she's okay.  I hate this. . . .


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3 7/28/09 -
Post by: JessStar on August 12, 2009, 05:06:53 PM
I sure wish we would get some info, any info, I'm afraid LE doesn't have anything.
I sure hope they have more than what we have.   ::MonkeyWaa::

Karma and No Rose -- I think they have more than they are revealing.  Unlike Florida with its Sunshine Laws, this waiting patiently can become nerve racking.  I do, however, believe they have more, a lot more.  I don't think they are as incompetent as some have asserted, I think they are keeping things close to the chest.  JMHO  And I do know for a fact that some of the info obtained here from research has been shared with them.  I only wish there was more public support in the community to bring Linesey home.
I hope you are right.I'm not saying the LE are incompetent,I'm just not sure they have much to go on.I wonder if Melissa and KaraK know they have to try their hardest to keep Lindsey's name and face out there?They did have some woman from a search center place there in McCleary and I wonder what happened to her?Blonde lady,was at the last vigil.They should be holding vigils every week.

Karma, they had been provided a space with phone lines, etc. but it was taken back.  I don't think the Baums have the resouces to do posters, etc.  And it needs to be organized, etc.  It really is a pity, but, as we all know and are so sensitive to, a little girl's safe return can depend upon it.  Because of limited resources, I heard members of LE are volunteering their time and they do have a space about 10 miles away.

I've been thinking a lot about how we can help.  The problem is, I still haven't come up with a plan.  This is a town of 1500.  Posters aren't going to do much unless they extend out to the outlying areas.  Everyone already knows about the case in McCleary.  The word needs to travel beyond McCleary.  But where?  And how do we accomplish that when we have a town full of people that don't want to help?  One thing that may be quick, easy and cheap is to find out if there are any public access channels on the local cable networks.  You know, the channels that announce upcoming community events and such, and see if they're running Lindsey's photo and reward message.  They may even be willing to donate space.  That will reach into many diverse households, and anyone that channel surfs (which most people do) will come across it eventually.





Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3 7/28/09 -
Post by: JessStar on August 12, 2009, 05:13:10 PM
Does any Monkeys know if it illegal for the police interrogate a minor?

Janet

This is a very complex question because of the use of the term "interrogate."  That has a very specific meaning.  Let me answer your question this way.  Full Custodial Interrogation of a minor outside of the juvenile justice system is generally impermissible.  However, the police are certainly allowed to question a minor whom they believe may have committed a crime.  And if the child makes an admission against interest (i.e., a confession), it's just as binding as if an adult made it.  In other words, police may delay turning a juvenile over to juvenile authorities or to his/her family in order to ask the child some questions, but they cannot use delay or prolonged exploratory questioning to enhance the compulsion inherent in in-custody interrogations.  Of course, Miranda applies if the interrogation is custodial.

Does that answer your question?


You know what, let me add something to my own post!  To be admissible as substantive evidence  a juvenile's confession must be preceded by advice of constitutional rights and a warning of the possible consequences of any admission, including the possibility that the child may be tried as an adult.  Once the child has been properly admonished with regard to all of the above, the police may interrogate the child, provided the child knowingly and voluntarily waives his rights.
Whether there is such a waiver depends on a number of factors such as the age, intelligence and experience of the juvenile. Whether a proper warning is given and whether there is an intelligent waiver is a factual matter for the court to decide in each case.


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3 7/28/09 -
Post by: Wyks on August 12, 2009, 05:13:16 PM
Does any Monkeys know if it illegal for the police interrogate a minor?

Janet

In most places it seems to be illegal, yes.  Supposedly, police need permission from the parent/guardian of a minor before that minor can be questioned/interrogated by the police, and that is supposedly to be done in the presence of the parent/guardian. 

Yep all that sounds real good.  Uh hmmm. 

Because in the real world, some police DO question/interrogate minors without their parent/guardian's permission and presence.  I know that because it happened to my family. 

Two of my three sons and their friends got themselves into some major trouble with the police sev. years ago.  The police came charging into our home, my sons and their friends were there, some were minors, some weren't. 

While I was trying to find out from one officer what the heck was going on, what had happened, why were they there..... several of the other officers had split my sons and their friends up, taking each of them in opposite directions around our house.  My mind was working overtime trying to figure out which of my son's friends were minors and where in my yard the officer had taken each one.  Had to zoom around to each and say "uh no way, NO questioning this kid until/unless you call the parent".  At the same time, making sure the police hadn't gotten to my own sons yet without me being right there.  It was utter madness!! 

One officer told me that the parent/guardian didn't need to be involved *unless* they actually needed to take that minor in for questioning.  That 'this type' of questioning was fine.  Still and all, those kids were each being raked over the coals for what they knew.  "This type" of questioning was still interrogation, IMO. 

The officers allowed most of the kids to leave, arresting two of my sons, and three of their friends.  The parents of those three kids were not notified of anything until AFTER the police had questioned them at length, handcuffed them, put in the back of the patrol cars and taken them to the station.  The officers had my phone, I couldn't make a call to those parents myself.  All I could do was to stand by and watch this all unfold, wondering what the heck happened to the supposed rights of a parent/guardian to be present and permission given FIRST. 

My middle son, (who as it turns out was not involved), was 18 at the time, and has a cognitive disability.  I know that police *can be* very tricky during questioning, and this son is very literal in his thinking.  The only thing that the police that day listened to me on is that they HAD to be careful in their questioning of him, that I would be standing right there, and I'd sue their asses if they made one step out of line with him, considering the fact that he has this disability.  (I was beyond pissed off by that point)  hehe...  To their credit, the officers did question him carefully.  To my middle son's credit, he knew nothing, he wasn't involved. 

I later asked an attorney why the police had been allowed to question the minors in the way they had, with no permission from the minors parent/guardian.  And could those parents press charges, complain, whatever.  The attorney said nope, it really wouldn't matter that much to the judge. 

A long drawn-out reply to your question, sorry.  My point is this:  it seems to me that there are rules made to be broken, at the discretion of the officers.  Maybe I'm a bit jaded.  But I've seen it happen, and it seemed to me that the last thing on the mind of the officers was to contact any parent. 

IMO, along with everything else we need to be teaching our kids to not answer any questions until their parent has been contacted and is standing there in person.   JMO.     



Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3 7/28/09 -
Post by: Tamikosmom on August 12, 2009, 05:18:45 PM
Does any Monkeys know if it illegal for the police interrogate a minor?

Janet

This is a very complex question because of the use of the term "interrogate."  That has a very specific meaning.  Let me answer your question this way.  Full Custodial Interrogation of a minor outside of the juvenile justice system is generally impermissible.  However, the police are certainly allowed to question a minor whom they believe may have committed a crime.  And if the child makes an admission against interest (i.e., a confession), it's just as binding as if an adult made it.  In other words, police may delay turning a juvenile over to juvenile authorities or to his/her family in order to ask the child some questions, but they cannot use delay or prolonged exploratory questioning to enhance the compulsion inherent in in-custody interrogations.  Of course, Miranda applies if the interrogation is custodial.

Does that answer your question?


No entirely.

JessStar ... I will be the devil's advocate.

When it is considered that a child may not fully comprehend the legal ramifications encompassing a confession during a police interrogation/questioning in the course of an investigation ... something does not seem right.

Would a child not be required under the law to have legal representation appointed if questioned/interrogated when it is considered that during the course of that questioning/interrogation his/her words may implicate him/her in a crime.

JessStar ... thank you for your response.

Janet


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3 7/28/09 -
Post by: KarmaRoundUp on August 12, 2009, 05:21:05 PM
I sure wish we would get some info, any info, I'm afraid LE doesn't have anything.
I sure hope they have more than what we have.   ::MonkeyWaa::

Karma and No Rose -- I think they have more than they are revealing.  Unlike Florida with its Sunshine Laws, this waiting patiently can become nerve racking.  I do, however, believe they have more, a lot more.  I don't think they are as incompetent as some have asserted, I think they are keeping things close to the chest.  JMHO  And I do know for a fact that some of the info obtained here from research has been shared with them.  I only wish there was more public support in the community to bring Linesey home.
I hope you are right.I'm not saying the LE are incompetent,I'm just not sure they have much to go on.I wonder if Melissa and KaraK know they have to try their hardest to keep Lindsey's name and face out there?They did have some woman from a search center place there in McCleary and I wonder what happened to her?Blonde lady,was at the last vigil.They should be holding vigils every week.

Karma, they had been provided a space with phone lines, etc. but it was taken back.  I don't think the Baums have the resouces to do posters, etc.  And it needs to be organized, etc.  It really is a pity, but, as we all know and are so sensitive to, a little girl's safe return can depend upon it.  Because of limited resources, I heard members of LE are volunteering their time and they do have a space about 10 miles away.
Yes,I heard about the place they had then lost.Wasn't there a lady in town just for this reason....to help them set up a search center?Last I heard they were trying to set one up in another town near McCleary.I just can't believe that there is not a building(UAW/VFW hall,Community Center hall,Churches?)there in McCleary that they can use.


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3 7/28/09 -
Post by: pink angel on August 12, 2009, 05:21:22 PM
(http://i31.tinypic.com/rif1gw.jpg)


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3 7/28/09 -
Post by: KarmaRoundUp on August 12, 2009, 05:22:18 PM
I "found"a new image of Lindsey today,I wonder if we can get Brandi to make this into a nice tag.



                         ::MonkeyHeart:: ::MonkeyHeart:: ::MonkeyHeart::


Lindsey really is a sweetheart.  Melissa Baum was so blessed.

Karma ... thank you for sharing.

Janet
You're welcome Janet.


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3 7/28/09 -
Post by: Tamikosmom on August 12, 2009, 05:23:35 PM
JessStar

I believe that most attorneys would advise their client ... child or adult ... not to reveal anything during questioning/interrogation that may implicate them wrongdoing.

Do I have that right or ... have I watched one too many LA Law episodes.

 ::MonkeyHaHa::

Janet


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3 7/28/09 -
Post by: pink angel on August 12, 2009, 05:27:45 PM
What about a magnetic or cling missing poster? One that will cling to semi-trucks? Ask the post office, UPS trucks, short and long term trucking companies in the area, to put the cling up on the back of their vehicle? Kind of like a mobile mini-billboard.


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3 7/28/09 -
Post by: no rose colored glasses on August 12, 2009, 05:27:59 PM
Great pic Pink  ::MonkeyAngel::


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3 7/28/09 -
Post by: pink angel on August 12, 2009, 05:30:08 PM
Great pic Pink  ::MonkeyAngel::

Thanks to Karma for posting that new picture of Lindsey. She's such a beautiful child. My heart breaks for her mom.


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3 7/28/09 -
Post by: KarmaRoundUp on August 12, 2009, 05:30:48 PM
I "found"a new image of Lindsey today,I wonder if we can get Brandi to make this into a nice tag.



                         ::MonkeyHeart:: ::MonkeyHeart:: ::MonkeyHeart::



I really like that photo of Lindsey, she looks so happy.  Is this photo ok for anyone to use for printing purposes?  I emailed the lindsey baum center today to ask if they would like a couple of really long plastic banners printed to hang from the overpass at the McCleary exit out on on the highway (I am waiting for a response) - I am hoping this is something that would appeal to them and that it is something that would be allowed by the State DOT or the Grays Harbor Co. Highway Dept.  I had to drive from Olympia to Aberdeen today and it occurred to me driving thru there that there is nothing visible alerting people who may not even know she is missing.

I also drove thru McCleary just to look and did not see any type of center or signs about Lindsey there either.  How heartbreaking for Melissa Baum, she must feel so helpless and alone right now, I cannot even imagine her pain over this.

I have a family member that has a banner business and I am willing to purchase a couple of them if they can be used and  I would like to put this photo of Lindsey on it if you dont mind.  Please let me know.  I sure wish I would have thought of this earlier.

Thanks
That would be great Sherip!!
It's not my image,it was found on yet another MS page of KaraK's daughter so I would imagine anyone could use it?
Thank you so much for stepping up to the plate for Lindsey.


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3 7/28/09 -
Post by: KarmaRoundUp on August 12, 2009, 05:38:55 PM
(http://i31.tinypic.com/rif1gw.jpg)
Thank you Pink
 ::MonkeyAngel::


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3 7/28/09 -
Post by: no rose colored glasses on August 12, 2009, 05:39:32 PM
I saw that on WS about Kara's daughter having another myspace page, along with some other nonsense that I was reading  ::MonkeyMad::


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3 7/28/09 -
Post by: KarmaRoundUp on August 12, 2009, 05:41:20 PM
What about a magnetic or cling missing poster? One that will cling to semi-trucks? Ask the post office, UPS trucks, short and long term trucking companies in the area, to put the cling up on the back of their vehicle? Kind of like a mobile mini-billboard.
That's another great idea.Scott Williams is a truck driver,maybe he could ask his company?


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3 7/28/09 -
Post by: KarmaRoundUp on August 12, 2009, 05:46:00 PM
I saw that on WS about Kara's daughter having another myspace page, along with some other nonsense that I was reading  ::MonkeyMad::
Yeah,I skipped right over a few of the"We are THE best of the internet"posts     ::MonkeyDevil2::

KaraK's daughter had a total of 6-7 MS pages.All of them stated her age different but at least 4 of them were made on or near the same day so she may have forgotten her pw or something then made another.
Her Fistey(what kinda name is that?)is now set at private but not a couple of the new ones.


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3 7/28/09 -
Post by: KarmaRoundUp on August 12, 2009, 05:46:53 PM
Great pic Pink  ::MonkeyAngel::

Thanks to Karma for posting that new picture of Lindsey. She's such a beautiful child. My heart breaks for her mom.
You're welcome Pink.


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3 7/28/09 -
Post by: Leroy on August 12, 2009, 05:47:38 PM
What about a magnetic or cling missing poster? One that will cling to semi-trucks? Ask the post office, UPS trucks, short and long term trucking companies in the area, to put the cling up on the back of their vehicle? Kind of like a mobile mini-billboard.

also for the truckers, if you print & deliver fliers to them, some carriers will put them as *stuffers* in the drivers payroll checks. 


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3 7/28/09 -
Post by: Leroy on August 12, 2009, 05:52:09 PM
What about a magnetic or cling missing poster? One that will cling to semi-trucks? Ask the post office, UPS trucks, short and long term trucking companies in the area, to put the cling up on the back of their vehicle? Kind of like a mobile mini-billboard.

Actually, I have a database at work that has just about every trucking company in the US in it...local and long haul carriers.  I can do a search for those that are in the area...and for some of them I may have contact info of who to speak with.


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3 7/28/09 -
Post by: JessStar on August 12, 2009, 05:55:25 PM
JessStar

I believe that most attorneys would advise their client ... child or adult ... not to reveal anything during questioning/interrogation that may implicate them wrongdoing.

Do I have that right or ... have I watched one too many LA Law episodes.

 ::MonkeyHaHa::

Janet

I think most attorneys would be present during interrogation and control it to make sure his/her client's interests are protected.  Most GOOD attorneys would not leave it up to their client to determine what may or may not implicate them in wrongdoing. 


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3 7/28/09 -
Post by: Lovinlife on August 12, 2009, 05:56:19 PM
What about a magnetic or cling missing poster? One that will cling to semi-trucks? Ask the post office, UPS trucks, short and long term trucking companies in the area, to put the cling up on the back of their vehicle? Kind of like a mobile mini-billboard.

Actually, I have a database at work that has just about every trucking company in the US in it...local and long haul carriers.  I can do a search for those that are in the area...and for some of them I may have contact info of who to speak with.
Bless you Leroy  ::MonkeyAngel::


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3 7/28/09 -
Post by: sherip on August 12, 2009, 05:57:52 PM
I sure wish we would get some info, any info, I'm afraid LE doesn't have anything.
I sure hope they have more than what we have.   ::MonkeyWaa::

Karma and No Rose -- I think they have more than they are revealing.  Unlike Florida with its Sunshine Laws, this waiting patiently can become nerve racking.  I do, however, believe they have more, a lot more.  I don't think they are as incompetent as some have asserted, I think they are keeping things close to the chest.  JMHO  And I do know for a fact that some of the info obtained here from research has been shared with them.  I only wish there was more public support in the community to bring Linesey home.
I hope you are right.I'm not saying the LE are incompetent,I'm just not sure they have much to go on.I wonder if Melissa and KaraK know they have to try their hardest to keep Lindsey's name and face out there?They did have some woman from a search center place there in McCleary and I wonder what happened to her?Blonde lady,was at the last vigil.They should be holding vigils every week.

Karma, they had been provided a space with phone lines, etc. but it was taken back.  I don't think the Baums have the resouces to do posters, etc.  And it needs to be organized, etc.  It really is a pity, but, as we all know and are so sensitive to, a little girl's safe return can depend upon it.  Because of limited resources, I heard members of LE are volunteering their time and they do have a space about 10 miles away.

I've been thinking a lot about how we can help.  The problem is, I still haven't come up with a plan.  This is a town of 1500.  Posters aren't going to do much unless they extend out to the outlying areas.  Everyone already knows about the case in McCleary.  The word needs to travel beyond McCleary.  But where?  And how do we accomplish that when we have a town full of people that don't want to help?  One thing that may be quick, easy and cheap is to find out if there are any public access channels on the local cable networks.  You know, the channels that announce upcoming community events and such, and see if they're running Lindsey's photo and reward message.  They may even be willing to donate space.  That will reach into many diverse households, and anyone that channel surfs (which most people do) will come across it eventually.





JessStar are you local?  I am very serious about helping get her face into the spotlight.  I also have some access to resources for printing color flyers.  I e-mailed the LindseyBaum.com with my contact info today so I can talk to someone there about printing a couple of banners to hang along the Highway - If I dont hear from them by tomorrow I will try to call Melissa Baum, I imagine she can be located thru directory assistance.

 



Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3 7/28/09 -
Post by: KarmaRoundUp on August 12, 2009, 05:58:02 PM
What about a magnetic or cling missing poster? One that will cling to semi-trucks? Ask the post office, UPS trucks, short and long term trucking companies in the area, to put the cling up on the back of their vehicle? Kind of like a mobile mini-billboard.

Actually, I have a database at work that has just about every trucking company in the US in it...local and long haul carriers.  I can do a search for those that are in the area...and for some of them I may have contact info of who to speak with.
Great job Leroy!


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3 7/28/09 -
Post by: sherip on August 12, 2009, 06:00:35 PM
(http://i31.tinypic.com/rif1gw.jpg)
That is beautiful pink angel.


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3 7/28/09 -
Post by: sherip on August 12, 2009, 06:05:59 PM
What about a magnetic or cling missing poster? One that will cling to semi-trucks? Ask the post office, UPS trucks, short and long term trucking companies in the area, to put the cling up on the back of their vehicle? Kind of like a mobile mini-billboard.

Actually, I have a database at work that has just about every trucking company in the US in it...local and long haul carriers.  I can do a search for those that are in the area...and for some of them I may have contact info of who to speak with.
Great job Leroy!

Can I post a website here that shows what they offer?  Not sure about the rules here, but in addition to banners this company also makes the magnetic/cling posters for vehicles you are talking about and I think that is a great idea because driving to Aberdeen today there were lots and lots of log trucks.  I asked for a price quote on both.


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3 7/28/09 -
Post by: KarmaRoundUp on August 12, 2009, 06:08:24 PM
What about a magnetic or cling missing poster? One that will cling to semi-trucks? Ask the post office, UPS trucks, short and long term trucking companies in the area, to put the cling up on the back of their vehicle? Kind of like a mobile mini-billboard.

Actually, I have a database at work that has just about every trucking company in the US in it...local and long haul carriers.  I can do a search for those that are in the area...and for some of them I may have contact info of who to speak with.
Great job Leroy!

Can I post a website here that shows what they offer?  Not sure about the rules here, but in addition to banners this company also makes the magnetic/cling posters for vehicles you are talking about and I think that is a great idea because driving to Aberdeen today there were lots and lots of log trucks.  I asked for a price quote on both.
I think you can post a link here.The more help the better it is for Lindsey.


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3 7/28/09 -
Post by: JessStar on August 12, 2009, 06:09:20 PM
Does any Monkeys know if it illegal for the police interrogate a minor?

Janet

This is a very complex question because of the use of the term "interrogate."  That has a very specific meaning.  Let me answer your question this way.  Full Custodial Interrogation of a minor outside of the juvenile justice system is generally impermissible.  However, the police are certainly allowed to question a minor whom they believe may have committed a crime.  And if the child makes an admission against interest (i.e., a confession), it's just as binding as if an adult made it.  In other words, police may delay turning a juvenile over to juvenile authorities or to his/her family in order to ask the child some questions, but they cannot use delay or prolonged exploratory questioning to enhance the compulsion inherent in in-custody interrogations.  Of course, Miranda applies if the interrogation is custodial.

Does that answer your question?


No entirely.

JessStar ... I will be the devil's advocate.

When it is considered that a child may not fully comprehend the legal ramifications encompassing a confession during a police interrogation/questioning in the course of an investigation ... something does not seem right.

Would a child not be required under the law to have legal representation appointed if questioned/interrogated when it is considered that during the course of that questioning/interrogation his/her words may implicate him/her in a crime.

JessStar ... thank you for your response.

Janet

Janet, as a former boss once told me when I just started practicing law, "If I wanted a devil's advocate, I would have hired the devil!"  LOL  Anyway, I anticipated that question, and I think answered it in my second post.  It's a question of fact for the Court.  What that means is it becomes a risk/benefit analysis for the interrogator.  Say, for example, a police officer walks into a fast food restaurant full of 13-18 year old kids on a Friday night.  He says, "Alright kids, I know there's a keg party tonight, where is it?"  At that point, the police officer smells alcohol on the 13 year old's breath and asks, "Have you been drinking?"  And the kid says, "Yes."  Admissible, confession, no doubt about it.

Now, let's change the facts.  Say the police officer says, "Kid, have you been drinking?"  And the kid says, "No."  And the policeman says, "I'm taking you down to the station."  By the time he gets the kid to the police station, his car wreaks from the smell of alcohol.  As he's transporting the kid into the police station, he notices something--the 13 year old boy is mentally disabled and has the mental capacity of a 6 year old.  So he says, "Look kid, you're never going to see your mom again unless you tell me the truth."  And the kid says, "Ok, yes, I was drinking.  And not only that, I robbed the bank last night and stabbed the teller"  Not admissible, no confession, no doubt about it.

I say this not to poke fun, but to stress that there can be no bright line rule because kids can be perfectly capable of understanding the ramifications of his/her acts.  The law already presumes that kids below a certain age are incapable of committing a crime.  So we're not talking about kids generally in the birth to 8 or 9 or 10 year old age (or older in some states).  Those kids are already protected--it doesn't matter if they confess or not, the law presumes they can't commit a crime, so the juvenile justice system deals with them.  We're talking about that class of kids where the mind starts to develop to the point that they are perfectly capable of understanding.  So the law strikes a balance--if the child is able to understand based on the factors I outlined in my previous post, we're good to go.  If he/she isn't, well then there's a problem with the admissibility of the evidence.

I hope that makes sense.  By the way, the law I discussed in my previous posts is the law in the State of Washington.  Other states may be different.


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3 7/28/09 -
Post by: Leroy on August 12, 2009, 06:10:14 PM
What about a magnetic or cling missing poster? One that will cling to semi-trucks? Ask the post office, UPS trucks, short and long term trucking companies in the area, to put the cling up on the back of their vehicle? Kind of like a mobile mini-billboard.

Actually, I have a database at work that has just about every trucking company in the US in it...local and long haul carriers.  I can do a search for those that are in the area...and for some of them I may have contact info of who to speak with.
Great job Leroy!

Can I post a website here that shows what they offer?  Not sure about the rules here, but in addition to banners this company also makes the magnetic/cling posters for vehicles you are talking about and I think that is a great idea because driving to Aberdeen today there were lots and lots of log trucks.  I asked for a price quote on both.

I think it is okay for you to post the website.


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3 7/28/09 -
Post by: no rose colored glasses on August 12, 2009, 06:10:30 PM
I saw that on WS about Kara's daughter having another myspace page, along with some other nonsense that I was reading  ::MonkeyMad::
Yeah,I skipped right over a few of the"We are THE best of the internet"posts     ::MonkeyDevil2::

KaraK's daughter had a total of 6-7 MS pages.All of them stated her age different but at least 4 of them were made on or near the same day so she may have forgotten her pw or something then made another.
Her Fistey(what kinda name is that?)is now set at private but not a couple of the new ones.

Maddening isn't it?  ::MonkeyMad::  I guess nobody learned anykind of lesson.


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3 7/28/09 -
Post by: no rose colored glasses on August 12, 2009, 06:11:25 PM
What about a magnetic or cling missing poster? One that will cling to semi-trucks? Ask the post office, UPS trucks, short and long term trucking companies in the area, to put the cling up on the back of their vehicle? Kind of like a mobile mini-billboard.

Actually, I have a database at work that has just about every trucking company in the US in it...local and long haul carriers.  I can do a search for those that are in the area...and for some of them I may have contact info of who to speak with.
That's a great idea  ::MonkeyCool::


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3 7/28/09 -
Post by: sherip on August 12, 2009, 06:12:01 PM
What about a magnetic or cling missing poster? One that will cling to semi-trucks? Ask the post office, UPS trucks, short and long term trucking companies in the area, to put the cling up on the back of their vehicle? Kind of like a mobile mini-billboard.

Actually, I have a database at work that has just about every trucking company in the US in it...local and long haul carriers.  I can do a search for those that are in the area...and for some of them I may have contact info of who to speak with.
Great job Leroy!

Can I post a website here that shows what they offer?  Not sure about the rules here, but in addition to banners this company also makes the magnetic/cling posters for vehicles you are talking about and I think that is a great idea because driving to Aberdeen today there were lots and lots of log trucks.  I asked for a price quote on both.
I think you can post a link here.The more help the better it is for Lindsey.

http://www.extremevinylsigns.com

It shows some samples of what can be printed.


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3 7/28/09 -
Post by: JessStar on August 12, 2009, 06:14:11 PM
I sure wish we would get some info, any info, I'm afraid LE doesn't have anything.
I sure hope they have more than what we have.   ::MonkeyWaa::

Karma and No Rose -- I think they have more than they are revealing.  Unlike Florida with its Sunshine Laws, this waiting patiently can become nerve racking.  I do, however, believe they have more, a lot more.  I don't think they are as incompetent as some have asserted, I think they are keeping things close to the chest.  JMHO  And I do know for a fact that some of the info obtained here from research has been shared with them.  I only wish there was more public support in the community to bring Linesey home.
I hope you are right.I'm not saying the LE are incompetent,I'm just not sure they have much to go on.I wonder if Melissa and KaraK know they have to try their hardest to keep Lindsey's name and face out there?They did have some woman from a search center place there in McCleary and I wonder what happened to her?Blonde lady,was at the last vigil.They should be holding vigils every week.

Karma, they had been provided a space with phone lines, etc. but it was taken back.  I don't think the Baums have the resouces to do posters, etc.  And it needs to be organized, etc.  It really is a pity, but, as we all know and are so sensitive to, a little girl's safe return can depend upon it.  Because of limited resources, I heard members of LE are volunteering their time and they do have a space about 10 miles away.

I've been thinking a lot about how we can help.  The problem is, I still haven't come up with a plan.  This is a town of 1500.  Posters aren't going to do much unless they extend out to the outlying areas.  Everyone already knows about the case in McCleary.  The word needs to travel beyond McCleary.  But where?  And how do we accomplish that when we have a town full of people that don't want to help?  One thing that may be quick, easy and cheap is to find out if there are any public access channels on the local cable networks.  You know, the channels that announce upcoming community events and such, and see if they're running Lindsey's photo and reward message.  They may even be willing to donate space.  That will reach into many diverse households, and anyone that channel surfs (which most people do) will come across it eventually.





JessStar are you local?  I am very serious about helping get her face into the spotlight.  I also have some access to resources for printing color flyers.  I e-mailed the LindseyBaum.com with my contact info today so I can talk to someone there about printing a couple of banners to hang along the Highway - If I dont hear from them by tomorrow I will try to call Melissa Baum, I imagine she can be located thru directory assistance.

 



Unfortunately, no, I am not.  I live over 3000 miles away.   :-(   Why, what do you have in mind?


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3 7/28/09 -
Post by: pink angel on August 12, 2009, 06:23:13 PM
What about a magnetic or cling missing poster? One that will cling to semi-trucks? Ask the post office, UPS trucks, short and long term trucking companies in the area, to put the cling up on the back of their vehicle? Kind of like a mobile mini-billboard.
That's another great idea.Scott Williams is a truck driver,maybe he could ask his company?
What about a magnetic or cling missing poster? One that will cling to semi-trucks? Ask the post office, UPS trucks, short and long term trucking companies in the area, to put the cling up on the back of their vehicle? Kind of like a mobile mini-billboard.

Actually, I have a database at work that has just about every trucking company in the US in it...local and long haul carriers.  I can do a search for those that are in the area...and for some of them I may have contact info of who to speak with.
Great job Leroy!

Can I post a website here that shows what they offer?  Not sure about the rules here, but in addition to banners this company also makes the magnetic/cling posters for vehicles you are talking about and I think that is a great idea because driving to Aberdeen today there were lots and lots of log trucks.  I asked for a price quote on both.
Good idea. Maybe they can give us a price break seeing how it's for a missing girl.

Thanks to both of you.

11x14 or 16x20 are both sizes that would work and are standard on window/vinyl clings. Make sure you tell them it will include a photograph.



Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3 7/28/09 -
Post by: pink angel on August 12, 2009, 06:25:45 PM
(http://i26.tinypic.com/5pg4ub.gif)


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3 7/28/09 -
Post by: Sister on August 12, 2009, 06:35:32 PM
(http://i26.tinypic.com/5pg4ub.gif)

Pink, that is beautiful!! Wow!  Makes me work harder.


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3 7/28/09 -
Post by: no rose colored glasses on August 12, 2009, 06:37:37 PM
Another beautiful picture  ::MonkeyAngel::


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3 7/28/09 -
Post by: sherip on August 12, 2009, 06:41:32 PM
I sure wish we would get some info, any info, I'm afraid LE doesn't have anything.
I sure hope they have more than what we have.   ::MonkeyWaa::
 



Karma and No Rose -- I think they have more than they are revealing.  Unlike Florida with its Sunshine Laws, this waiting patiently can become nerve racking.  I do, however, believe they have more, a lot more.  I don't think they are as incompetent as some have asserted, I think they are keeping things close to the chest.  JMHO  And I do know for a fact that some of the info obtained here from research has been shared with them.  I only wish there was more public support in the community to bring Linesey home.
I hope you are right.I'm not saying the LE are incompetent,I'm just not sure they have much to go on.I wonder if Melissa and KaraK know they have to try their hardest to keep Lindsey's name and face out there?They did have some woman from a search center place there in McCleary and I wonder what happened to her?Blonde lady,was at the last vigil.They should be holding vigils every week.

Karma, they had been provided a space with phone lines, etc. but it was taken back.  I don't think the Baums have the resouces to do posters, etc.  And it needs to be organized, etc.  It really is a pity, but, as we all know and are so sensitive to, a little girl's safe return can depend upon it.  Because of limited resources, I heard members of LE are volunteering their time and they do have a space about 10 miles away.

I've been thinking a lot about how we can help.  The problem is, I still haven't come up with a plan.  This is a town of 1500.  Posters aren't going to do much unless they extend out to the outlying areas.  Everyone already knows about the case in McCleary.  The word needs to travel beyond McCleary.  But where?  And how do we accomplish that when we have a town full of people that don't want to help?  One thing that may be quick, easy and cheap is to find out if there are any public access channels on the local cable networks.  You know, the channels that announce upcoming community events and such, and see if they're running Lindsey's photo and reward message.  They may even be willing to donate space.  That will reach into many diverse households, and anyone that channel surfs (which most people do) will come across it eventually.





JessStar are you local?  I am very serious about helping get her face into the spotlight.  I also have some access to resources for printing color flyers.  I e-mailed the LindseyBaum.com with my contact info today so I can talk to someone there about printing a couple of banners to hang along the Highway - If I dont hear from them by tomorrow I will try to call Melissa Baum, I imagine she can be located thru directory assistance.

 



Unfortunately, no, I am not.  I live over 3000 miles away.   :-(   Why, what do you have in mind?


We'll since you are that far away legal advice will work! :)

I just contacted someone from the Tacoma News Tribune that I know to see if it is possible for an ad to be placed giving information where people could by a door cling or vinyl sign's with Lindsey's information on it (maybe trucking company's like some have suggested).  If I got the vinyl sign company to agree to take orders that they would ship directly to people who placed orders - is there any problem with this?  Since they would be buying directly from a manufacturer then a non-profit would not have to be set up correct?  Do you see any problem with this idea? 

People here on this site can also forward information to whoever they think would help by purchasing these things and placing them on there vehicles so we can all work on trying to get her face out there and the media interested.

Thoughts?


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3 7/28/09 -
Post by: mamacrazy30 on August 12, 2009, 06:49:52 PM
(http://i26.tinypic.com/5pg4ub.gif)
oh pink. we have not forgotten her.  i think about her every day ::MonkeyNoNo::


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3 7/28/09 -
Post by: KarmaRoundUp on August 12, 2009, 07:41:54 PM
I saw that on WS about Kara's daughter having another myspace page, along with some other nonsense that I was reading  ::MonkeyMad::
Yeah,I skipped right over a few of the"We are THE best of the internet"posts     ::MonkeyDevil2::

KaraK's daughter had a total of 6-7 MS pages.All of them stated her age different but at least 4 of them were made on or near the same day so she may have forgotten her pw or something then made another.
Her Fistey(what kinda name is that?)is now set at private but not a couple of the new ones.

Maddening isn't it?  ::MonkeyMad::  I guess nobody learned anykind of lesson.
Seems that way right?I think the kids make these MS's at their aunts(Floodstrom?)house and access them there also.


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3 7/28/09 -
Post by: KarmaRoundUp on August 12, 2009, 07:43:58 PM
What about a magnetic or cling missing poster? One that will cling to semi-trucks? Ask the post office, UPS trucks, short and long term trucking companies in the area, to put the cling up on the back of their vehicle? Kind of like a mobile mini-billboard.

Actually, I have a database at work that has just about every trucking company in the US in it...local and long haul carriers.  I can do a search for those that are in the area...and for some of them I may have contact info of who to speak with.
Great job Leroy!

Can I post a website here that shows what they offer?  Not sure about the rules here, but in addition to banners this company also makes the magnetic/cling posters for vehicles you are talking about and I think that is a great idea because driving to Aberdeen today there were lots and lots of log trucks.  I asked for a price quote on both.
I think you can post a link here.The more help the better it is for Lindsey.

http://www.extremevinylsigns.com

It shows some samples of what can be printed.
Thank you Sherip.


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3 7/28/09 -
Post by: mamacrazy30 on August 12, 2009, 07:44:13 PM
I saw that on WS about Kara's daughter having another myspace page, along with some other nonsense that I was reading  ::MonkeyMad::
Yeah,I skipped right over a few of the"We are THE best of the internet"posts     ::MonkeyDevil2::

KaraK's daughter had a total of 6-7 MS pages.All of them stated her age different but at least 4 of them were made on or near the same day so she may have forgotten her pw or something then made another.
Her Fistey(what kinda name is that?)is now set at private but not a couple of the new ones.

Maddening isn't it?  ::MonkeyMad::  I guess nobody learned anykind of lesson.
Seems that way right?I think the kids make these MS's at their aunts(Floodstrom?)house and access them there also.
::MonkeyMad:: ::MonkeyNoNo::


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3 7/28/09 -
Post by: KarmaRoundUp on August 12, 2009, 07:45:32 PM
(http://i26.tinypic.com/5pg4ub.gif)
Beautiful Pink!


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3 7/28/09 -
Post by: JessStar on August 12, 2009, 07:48:05 PM
Sherip, I don't see any problem on your end as long as sales tax is paid. The manufacturer will need to determine if it could sell directly to buyers as the mfg would be responsible for collecting and remitting the tax.

Hope that helps.


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3 7/28/09 -
Post by: KarmaRoundUp on August 12, 2009, 07:48:45 PM
Have a good night you all,I'm trying to get off this puter earlier to prep myself for"back to work"mode.

Praying for you Lindsey.

 ::MonkeyAngel::


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3 7/28/09 -
Post by: JessStar on August 12, 2009, 07:54:06 PM
Good nite Karma. Praying for Lindsey for sure.


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3 7/28/09 -
Post by: no rose colored glasses on August 12, 2009, 07:55:00 PM
Have a good night you all,I'm trying to get off this puter earlier to prep myself for"back to work"mode.

Praying for you Lindsey.

 ::MonkeyAngel::
Have a good evening  ::MonkeyAngel::


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3 7/28/09 -
Post by: no rose colored glasses on August 12, 2009, 08:16:57 PM
http://www.king5.com/localnews/stories/NW_081209WAB-lindsey-baum-mom-KS.d38b630d.html


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3 7/28/09 -
Post by: AZSunny on August 12, 2009, 09:09:01 PM
http://www.king5.com/localnews/stories/NW_081209WAB-lindsey-baum-mom-KS.d38b630d.html

I hope she brings flyers!  It should get some media coverage nationally. 


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3 7/28/09 -
Post by: Tamikosmom on August 12, 2009, 10:05:59 PM
http://www.king5.com/localnews/stories/NW_081209WAB-lindsey-baum-mom-KS.d38b630d.html

Where is Josh Baum?

Janet


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3 7/28/09 -
Post by: mamacrazy30 on August 12, 2009, 10:22:23 PM
Where is Lindsey Baum????   ::MonkeyConfused:: ::MonkeyAngel::


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3 7/28/09 -
Post by: pink angel on August 13, 2009, 12:04:32 AM
(http://i29.tinypic.com/25avt.jpg)

How about bumper stickers? They are pretty low cost and could be handed out to truckers and mailed to people out of the area.


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3 7/28/09 -
Post by: A_News_Junkie_Monkey on August 13, 2009, 01:44:17 AM
Sherip, I don't see any problem on your end as long as sales tax is paid. The manufacturer will need to determine if it could sell directly to buyers as the mfg would be responsible for collecting and remitting the tax.

Hope that helps.

Sherip - If you want to be really super safe on the use of the photo - I think her mom is who you need permission from.  The pic could have been posted without a permission to the myspace.  I think whomever took the photo owns the rights, but I would think if her mom said it is fine to use you would be good to go. 

And you have thought of city ordinances and all that.  Don't forget the utility companies the banner would hang on.  Say if you nailed it to a telephone pole - contact them first.
BRAVO on this idea!


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3 7/28/09 -
Post by: Scandi on August 13, 2009, 03:23:25 AM
Hi RoseColoredGlasses,

I've been doing some follow up on 'Al'/Allen who was an employee of the Straddleline ORV Park in McCleary and was 'let go' suddenly {without notice to the other employees} about the 11th or so of July.  He was doing the caretaker duties in the ORV Park because at the time the regular Caretaker position was vacant.  It was also said his computer at the Park was taken by police. 

I came upon a post you wrote here on the 16th:  "Me too, now if I understand this right this man has a daughter who is friends with Lindsey. They are using a name of this person, but I'm not sure if it is the correct person, so that is why I didn't want to say his name, also because they put up an arrest on him, I think for some kind of domestic disturbance".


Putting everything together I have learned so far I'd like to learn more about him.  Call it a gut feeling if you will.  There just seem to be too many things that seem to line up about this man. Even to where I think he fits with some things WS's Astro Thread has mentioned on Lindsey's case.  And all we know right now is his first name and that there was a disciplinary hearing called involving him at the request of Grays Harbor County I believe, the organization who is in charge of the ORV Park.

I'd like to see what more you can find out so we can zone in on him in a discreet way.  Maybe his daughter has a MS account and I know nothing about those.  Hopefully someone here can sleuth the disciplinary hearing.

Thanks Rose , and also anyone who might be able to shed some light here.  It's now going on 7 long and intense weeks, trying to find Lindsey.  She needs to be brought home.  xox


PS:  I'll keep up with the posts, reading in the morning and after work to see if you learn anything more. 




Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3 7/28/09 -
Post by: no rose colored glasses on August 13, 2009, 09:47:26 AM
Scandi, yes I too believe there is more to this man, all of a sudden the topic of Allen was dropped, so I just assumed perhaps there was nothing relevant to this case. There are some good researchers on here, I am not one of them  ::MonkeyConfused::, I'm hoping to hear more about him. And how well his daughter knew Lindsey.


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3 7/28/09 -
Post by: KarmaRoundUp on August 13, 2009, 09:51:17 AM
(http://i29.tinypic.com/25avt.jpg)

How about bumper stickers? They are pretty low cost and could be handed out to truckers and mailed to people out of the area.
Fantastic idea!


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3 7/28/09 -
Post by: no rose colored glasses on August 13, 2009, 09:55:37 AM
That is a great idea  ::MonkeyAngel::


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3 7/28/09 -
Post by: KarmaRoundUp on August 13, 2009, 10:03:33 AM
http://www.king5.com/localnews/stories/NW_081209WAB-lindsey-baum-mom-KS.d38b630d.html
The article above won't let me copy but Melissa Baum is going to NY for this program below.A poster somewhere is saying Michelle Bart is affiliated with this program but I haven't found any links connecting her to this program....yet.

Free Music Concerts at 'AMBER Ready Back-to-School Weekend at ABC Studios' Live in Times Square, NY
Newswire Services July 30, 2009Grammy Nominee Trey Songz, Bad Boy's Day 26, Doug E. Fresh, Toby Love & More, Professional Athletes, Celebrity Guests, Virtual Strolling Entertainment, Food & Prizes

August 15-16, 2009, noon - 9 p.m.

ROCKAWAY, N.J. -- This fall, 50 million of America's children will return to school. By summer, 1 million of them will be classified as missing or abducted. In an effort to reduce the number of missing and abducted children, and to quickly recover those that are classified as such, AMBER Ready, Inc. and the AMBER Ready Foundation will launch the nation's first wireless child protection service and community predator program at the AMBER Ready Back To School Safety Weekend at ABC Studios, live in Times Square, August 14-16, 2009.
More info at link:

http://www.californiachronicle.com/articles/view/112380

Here is the Amber Ready Back To School Safety website.

http://www.amberready.com/

Info from above site:

AMBER Ready NewsWire

AMBER Ready

Back-to-School Safety Weekend
at ABC Studios,

Times Square, New York, NY
August 14th, 15th, 16th


For VIP Access Click Here





Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3 7/28/09 -
Post by: Tamikosmom on August 13, 2009, 10:16:05 AM

http://www.king5.com/localnews/stories/NW_081209WAB-lindsey-baum-mom-KS.d38b630d.html
The article above won't let me copy but Melissa Baum is going to NY for this program below.A poster somewhere is saying Michelle Bart is affiliated with this program but I haven't found any links connecting her to this program....yet.

<snipped>


Karma ... please remind me.  Who is Michelle Bart?

Thanks

Janet

+++++++

Missing McCleary girl's mom heading to NY
06:20 PM PDT on Wednesday, August 12, 2009
By DREW MIKKELSEN / KING 5 News


McCLEARY, Wash. - The mother of a girl missing since June is going to New York City to raise awareness about missing children.

Melissa Baum will be part of the “Amber Ready Back to School Safety Weekend” starting Friday in Times Square. Amber Ready is a company that produces DNA and fingerprint kits for children.

Baum’s 10-year-old daughter Lindsey vanished June 26. Lindsey was last seen walking home from a friend’s house. Police have not found her or anyone who knows what happened to her.

“I know she’s alive,” said Melissa Baum, who refuses to give up hope her daughter will be found safe.

Melissa Baum just bought school supplies for Lindsey. She’s supposed to start school as a sixth grader later this summer

A $10,000 reward is being offered to anyone who helps police locate Lindsey.

The reward started as a $6,000 offer, but an anonymous donor raised it to $10,000.

“There are people out there that really do care,” said Melissa Baum.

http://www.king5.com/localnews/stories/NW_081209WAB-lindsey-baum-mom-KS.d38b630d.html


 


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3 7/28/09 -
Post by: no rose colored glasses on August 13, 2009, 10:25:16 AM
Michelle Bart was a spokeswoman for the Anthonys for awhile she is connected to some missing people groups, I can't think off hand the names, she is trouble.


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3 7/28/09 -
Post by: Leroy on August 13, 2009, 10:28:56 AM
Michelle Bart was a spokeswoman for the Anthonys for awhile she is connected to some missing people groups, I can't think off hand the names, she is trouble.

I believe this is one of her organizations

http://www.helpingheroes.com/


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3 7/28/09 -
Post by: no rose colored glasses on August 13, 2009, 10:30:16 AM
Michelle Bart was a spokeswoman for the Anthonys for awhile she is connected to some missing people groups, I can't think off hand the names, she is trouble.

I believe this is one of her organizations

http://www.helpingheroes.com/

Thanks Leroy  ::MonkeyCool::


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3 7/28/09 -
Post by: A_News_Junkie_Monkey on August 13, 2009, 10:34:01 AM
http://www.king5.com/localnews/stories/NW_081209WAB-lindsey-baum-mom-KS.d38b630d.html
The article above won't let me copy but Melissa Baum is going to NY for this program below.A poster somewhere is saying Michelle Bart is affiliated with this program but I haven't found any links connecting her to this program....yet.

Free Music Concerts at 'AMBER Ready Back-to-School Weekend at ABC Studios' Live in Times Square, NY
Newswire Services July 30, 2009Grammy Nominee Trey Songz, Bad Boy's Day 26, Doug E. Fresh, Toby Love & More, Professional Athletes, Celebrity Guests, Virtual Strolling Entertainment, Food & Prizes

August 15-16, 2009, noon - 9 p.m.

ROCKAWAY, N.J. -- This fall, 50 million of America's children will return to school. By summer, 1 million of them will be classified as missing or abducted. In an effort to reduce the number of missing and abducted children, and to quickly recover those that are classified as such, AMBER Ready, Inc. and the AMBER Ready Foundation will launch the nation's first wireless child protection service and community predator program at the AMBER Ready Back To School Safety Weekend at ABC Studios, live in Times Square, August 14-16, 2009.
More info at link:

http://www.californiachronicle.com/articles/view/112380

Here is the Amber Ready Back To School Safety website.

http://www.amberready.com/

Info from above site:

AMBER Ready NewsWire

AMBER Ready

Back-to-School Safety Weekend
at ABC Studios,

Times Square, New York, NY
August 14th, 15th, 16th


For VIP Access Click Here


My hinky meter is up as it is listed on left under community events.  http://nationalvigilforhope.org/?page_id=2
I know they have at least one gig similiar to the Amber Ready.  Wonder how long Amber Ready has been around........


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3 7/28/09 -
Post by: A_News_Junkie_Monkey on August 13, 2009, 10:37:25 AM
http://www.king5.com/localnews/stories/NW_081209WAB-lindsey-baum-mom-KS.d38b630d.html
The article above won't let me copy but Melissa Baum is going to NY for this program below.A poster somewhere is saying Michelle Bart is affiliated with this program but I haven't found any links connecting her to this program....yet.

Free Music Concerts at 'AMBER Ready Back-to-School Weekend at ABC Studios' Live in Times Square, NY
Newswire Services July 30, 2009Grammy Nominee Trey Songz, Bad Boy's Day 26, Doug E. Fresh, Toby Love & More, Professional Athletes, Celebrity Guests, Virtual Strolling Entertainment, Food & Prizes

August 15-16, 2009, noon - 9 p.m.

ROCKAWAY, N.J. -- This fall, 50 million of America's children will return to school. By summer, 1 million of them will be classified as missing or abducted. In an effort to reduce the number of missing and abducted children, and to quickly recover those that are classified as such, AMBER Ready, Inc. and the AMBER Ready Foundation will launch the nation's first wireless child protection service and community predator program at the AMBER Ready Back To School Safety Weekend at ABC Studios, live in Times Square, August 14-16, 2009.
More info at link:

http://www.californiachronicle.com/articles/view/112380

Here is the Amber Ready Back To School Safety website.

http://www.amberready.com/

Info from above site:

AMBER Ready NewsWire

AMBER Ready

Back-to-School Safety Weekend
at ABC Studios,

Times Square, New York, NY
August 14th, 15th, 16th


For VIP Access Click Here


My hinky meter is up as it is listed on left under community events.  http://nationalvigilforhope.org/?page_id=2
I know they have at least one gig similiar to the Amber Ready.  Wonder how long Amber Ready has been around........

I think this is the one someone determined by registered names search as MBart  http://instantamber.com/     no info on when it was formed or Board of directors that I can find on a drive by.


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3 7/28/09 -
Post by: no rose colored glasses on August 13, 2009, 10:37:39 AM
My hinky meter is going off as well, I do hope that Melissa isn't being taken advantage of  ::MonkeyMad::


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3 7/28/09 -
Post by: A_News_Junkie_Monkey on August 13, 2009, 10:39:58 AM
My hinky meter is going off as well, I do hope that Melissa isn't being taken advantage of  ::MonkeyMad::

An you know, predators move in and pick victims who are the most desperate.  Kinda like pedophiles do with picking their victims.

Given nobody in that stinkin town will help her - this does worry me till determined who is behind it.


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3 7/28/09 -
Post by: Leroy on August 13, 2009, 10:41:46 AM


I think this is the one someone determined by registered names search as MBart  http://instantamber.com/     no info on when it was formed or Board of directors that I can find on a drive by.

http://instantamber.com/about/

was it formed in 2007???


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3 7/28/09 -
Post by: A_News_Junkie_Monkey on August 13, 2009, 10:43:23 AM
My hinky meter is going off as well, I do hope that Melissa isn't being taken advantage of  ::MonkeyMad::

As you know, predators move in and pick victims who are the most desperate.  Kinda like pedophiles do with picking their victims.

Given nobody in that stinkin town will help her - this does worry me till determined who is behind it.

Edit to fix typo.

Adding - if anyone has a paid service for business see what you can find on AMBER READY AND INSTANT AMBER.  And if you can search by name Michelle Bart.  Please and Thank you!!


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3 7/28/09 -
Post by: JessStar on August 13, 2009, 10:45:06 AM
Maybe I'm being overly-antagonistic, but perhaps someone local should remind King5 and other media outlets that the "missing mccleary girl" has a name- it's Lindsey Baum and she's only 11 years old. Her name should be reported in headlines at every opportunity. She shouldn't be referred to generically.


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3 7/28/09 -
Post by: A_News_Junkie_Monkey on August 13, 2009, 10:45:15 AM


I think this is the one someone determined by registered names search as MBart  http://instantamber.com/     no info on when it was formed or Board of directors that I can find on a drive by.

http://instantamber.com/about/

was it formed in 2007???

I have sick puppy so can't go searching today - but seems they just registered two or three new companies in the last two weeks.  We talked about it in the Caylee thread. 


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3 7/28/09 -
Post by: Tamikosmom on August 13, 2009, 10:48:42 AM
Michelle Bart was a spokeswoman for the Anthonys for awhile she is connected to some missing people groups, I can't think off hand the names, she is trouble.

I believe this is one of her organizations

http://www.helpingheroes.com/


Thank you no rose colored glasses and Leroy.

I remember now.  Did Michelle Bart have any connection to Kidfinders?

I have learned the hard way that some directors of organizations/charities/trust funds are more about raising monies to line their own pockets.  Donors must take personal responsibility to investigate prior to responding with their hearts.  Financial statements that give a full accounting should be available to potential donors upon request.

Janet



Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3 7/28/09 -
Post by: no rose colored glasses on August 13, 2009, 10:50:51 AM
Kidfinders was run by the Milsteads, but I'm not sure if Michelle Bart was part of that, I really don't think so though.


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3 7/28/09 -
Post by: AZSunny on August 13, 2009, 10:59:19 AM
Is Michelle Bart the woman from Arizona?     By the way, this is being broadcast live from the ABC studios, so they must of done some investigation of this person, i would hope.  Is it being broadcast tomorrow?


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3 7/28/09 -
Post by: pink angel on August 13, 2009, 11:14:50 AM
Amber Ready is NOT a charity or organization. It's selling safety ID kits. It's one of the many organizations running off of parents fears.

The AMBER Ready Program is the fastest means of enabling law enforcement agencies to aid in the recovery of your child should they ever become missing. Your children’s Wireless Phone Profiles can be locked into your wireless phone with descriptive data and photos. The program provides parents with the following child recovery and safety tools:

    * The Wireless Phone Profile Program (Details)
    * Profile Backup for Replacement Phones (Details)
    * 24-Hour Alert & Police Support (Details)
    * DNA and Child Fingerprinting Kit (Details)
    * Emergency Car Charger for Existing Wireless Phone* (Details)
    * Child Safety DVD with Emergency Instructions & Tips* (Details)
    * Child Internet Safety Web Browser (Details)
    * Backpack Tags and Door Stickers (Details)
    * 1000 Free Missing Child Posters (If Your Child is Missing)

Subscribers that elect to receive the Free Sponsorship Rebate Program will also receive a Free or Discounted Camera and Picture Messaging Phone of their choice with their contract renewal or new wireless account activation. (Details)

50 bucks for 2 year membership.


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3 7/28/09 -
Post by: A_News_Junkie_Monkey on August 13, 2009, 11:21:04 AM
Amber Ready is NOT a charity or organization. It's selling safety ID kits. It's one of the many organizations running off of parents fears.

The AMBER Ready Program is the fastest means of enabling law enforcement agencies to aid in the recovery of your child should they ever become missing. Your children’s Wireless Phone Profiles can be locked into your wireless phone with descriptive data and photos. The program provides parents with the following child recovery and safety tools:

    * The Wireless Phone Profile Program (Details)
    * Profile Backup for Replacement Phones (Details)
    * 24-Hour Alert & Police Support (Details)
    * DNA and Child Fingerprinting Kit (Details)
    * Emergency Car Charger for Existing Wireless Phone* (Details)
    * Child Safety DVD with Emergency Instructions & Tips* (Details)
    * Child Internet Safety Web Browser (Details)
    * Backpack Tags and Door Stickers (Details)
    * 1000 Free Missing Child Posters (If Your Child is Missing)

Subscribers that elect to receive the Free Sponsorship Rebate Program will also receive a Free or Discounted Camera and Picture Messaging Phone of their choice with their contract renewal or new wireless account activation. (Details)

50 bucks for 2 year membership.

You know - My personal opinion, but i wouldn't give an internet company information on my child, complete with address, photo, etc.  Who is to say an employee won't abduct your child? 
You can go to local police station in most cities and have your child fingerprinted and do all this yourself.  If you are a good parent you don't need to bet against yourself for a phone and fliers, etc.   If you child goes missing, God forbid - I think companies and communities would help you get this and more.  And a monkey will probably have a website, myspace and facebook up within the hour!


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3 7/28/09 -
Post by: pink angel on August 13, 2009, 11:29:18 AM
Amber Ready is NOT a charity or organization. It's selling safety ID kits. It's one of the many organizations running off of parents fears.

The AMBER Ready Program is the fastest means of enabling law enforcement agencies to aid in the recovery of your child should they ever become missing. Your children’s Wireless Phone Profiles can be locked into your wireless phone with descriptive data and photos. The program provides parents with the following child recovery and safety tools:

    * The Wireless Phone Profile Program (Details)
    * Profile Backup for Replacement Phones (Details)
    * 24-Hour Alert & Police Support (Details)
    * DNA and Child Fingerprinting Kit (Details)
    * Emergency Car Charger for Existing Wireless Phone* (Details)
    * Child Safety DVD with Emergency Instructions & Tips* (Details)
    * Child Internet Safety Web Browser (Details)
    * Backpack Tags and Door Stickers (Details)
    * 1000 Free Missing Child Posters (If Your Child is Missing)

Subscribers that elect to receive the Free Sponsorship Rebate Program will also receive a Free or Discounted Camera and Picture Messaging Phone of their choice with their contract renewal or new wireless account activation. (Details)

50 bucks for 2 year membership.

You know - My personal opinion, but i wouldn't give an internet company information on my child, complete with address, photo, etc.  Who is to say an employee won't abduct your child? 
You can go to local police station in most cities and have your child fingerprinted and do all this yourself.  If you are a good parent you don't need to bet against yourself for a phone and fliers, etc.   If you child goes missing, God forbid - I think companies and communities would help you get this and more.  And a monkey will probably have a website, myspace and facebook up within the hour!

edit correction: It's a BUSINESS. Not an organization.

I agree with you AZ. Most communities offer Safety ID programs for free. Most police stations offer them too.

You get a nice container or tub with a lid. Shoebox size.
All you need to do yourself is take some sterile swabs. Swab your kids cheek with a couple of them. Stick it into a plastic container. (not a baggie) Take a clip of their hair and store it. Always keep a current photograph. (at least every couple months for older kids, every month for younger) Have the police take a fingerprint card.  Stick everything in the tub and keep it updated. Mark it on the calender.


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3 7/28/09 -
Post by: Sister on August 13, 2009, 11:31:02 AM
Amber Ready is NOT a charity or organization. It's selling safety ID kits. It's one of the many organizations running off of parents fears.

The AMBER Ready Program is the fastest means of enabling law enforcement agencies to aid in the recovery of your child should they ever become missing. Your children’s Wireless Phone Profiles can be locked into your wireless phone with descriptive data and photos. The program provides parents with the following child recovery and safety tools:

    * The Wireless Phone Profile Program (Details)
    * Profile Backup for Replacement Phones (Details)
    * 24-Hour Alert & Police Support (Details)
    * DNA and Child Fingerprinting Kit (Details)
    * Emergency Car Charger for Existing Wireless Phone* (Details)
    * Child Safety DVD with Emergency Instructions & Tips* (Details)
    * Child Internet Safety Web Browser (Details)
    * Backpack Tags and Door Stickers (Details)
    * 1000 Free Missing Child Posters (If Your Child is Missing)

Subscribers that elect to receive the Free Sponsorship Rebate Program will also receive a Free or Discounted Camera and Picture Messaging Phone of their choice with their contract renewal or new wireless account activation. (Details)

50 bucks for 2 year membership.

You know - My personal opinion, but i wouldn't give an internet company information on my child, complete with address, photo, etc.  Who is to say an employee won't abduct your child? 
You can go to local police station in most cities and have your child fingerprinted and do all this yourself.  If you are a good parent you don't need to bet against yourself for a phone and fliers, etc.   If you child goes missing, God forbid - I think companies and communities would help you get this and more.  And a monkey will probably have a website, myspace and facebook up within the hour!

Bart does nothing for free -- she is connected to Milstead through the Anthonys.  And yes, even in country communities, the local sheriff's dept and local State Police have programs for free identification.  They prey on the fears -- Melissa Baum is very vunerable right now.  Prayers for her, Josh, and the family.


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3 7/28/09 -
Post by: Tamikosmom on August 13, 2009, 11:50:44 AM
I am no doubt that Melissa Baum is being used by Michelle Bart to further Bart's personal  agenda ... but I somehow believe that Melissa Baum also is going to benefit financially from this ABC special.  Think about George and Cindy Anthony and ... their network interviews.

I hope I am wrong.

Janet


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3 7/28/09 -
Post by: no rose colored glasses on August 13, 2009, 12:04:29 PM
My girls are in their twenties, but I remember when they were little there was like a little carnival that the police were putting on and my kids got fingerprinted then, it was free.


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3 7/28/09 -
Post by: Sister on August 13, 2009, 12:19:11 PM
My girls are in their twenties, but I remember when they were little there was like a little carnival that the police were putting on and my kids got fingerprinted then, it was free.

No Rose, absolutely -- it's a win, win situation.  Helps parents, helps kids, helps LE.  And yes, it's free.  Unfortunately in today's society, it's a must have.  We have a program going on in our area now to get more children ID and the info given to parents for safe keeping.  Being pro-active is always good!


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3 7/28/09 -
Post by: no rose colored glasses on August 13, 2009, 12:21:19 PM
My girls are in their twenties, but I remember when they were little there was like a little carnival that the police were putting on and my kids got fingerprinted then, it was free.

No Rose, absolutely -- it's a win, win situation.  Helps parents, helps kids, helps LE.  And yes, it's free.  Unfortunately in today's society, it's a must have.  We have a program going on in our area now to get more children ID and the info given to parents for safe keeping.  Being pro-active is always good!
I agree, and I just hope that people aren't taking advantage of Melissa, but at least Lindsey's name will be out there, so that is good.


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3 7/28/09 -
Post by: love4ever on August 13, 2009, 01:16:13 PM
I am no doubt that Melissa Baum is being used by Michelle Bart to further Bart's personal  agenda ... but I somehow believe that Melissa Baum also is going to benefit financially from this ABC special.  Think about George and Cindy Anthony and ... their network interviews.

I hope I am wrong.

Janet


Are u serious?


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3 7/28/09 -
Post by: Sister on August 13, 2009, 01:18:44 PM
Love, don't go there
 ::MonkeyBike::
 :smt021


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3 7/28/09 -
Post by: love4ever on August 13, 2009, 01:22:40 PM
Love, don't go there
 ::MonkeyBike::
 :smt021


I can't help it... ::MonkeyTease:::...but I will listen  ::MonkeyBike::..lol


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3 7/28/09 -
Post by: Leroy on August 13, 2009, 01:35:02 PM
Okay, I'm stealing Muffy's line for a minute...

"Everyone is entitled to his own opinion, but not his own facts." ~ Daniel Patrick Moynihan


There are several of us that are *jaded* because of Cindy & George Anthonys' actions, so I can understand how some monkeys feel about MB and the ABC special.

Not that I agree, but I certainly understand.



Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3 7/28/09 -
Post by: Sister on August 13, 2009, 01:41:40 PM
Leroy, I agree about being jaded because of the Ants.  However, their actions in public have assuredly been different the Melissa's, but you're right, we're blessed to live in a free country.


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3 7/28/09 -
Post by: Leroy on August 13, 2009, 01:45:13 PM
Leroy, I agree about being jaded because of the Ants.  However, their actions in public have assuredly been different the Melissa's, but you're right, we're blessed to live in a free country.

I agree Sister   ::MonkeyWink:: 


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3 7/28/09 -
Post by: Tamikosmom on August 13, 2009, 01:56:45 PM
Okay, I'm stealing Muffy's line for a minute...

"Everyone is entitled to his own opinion, but not his own facts." ~ Daniel Patrick Moynihan


There are several of us that are *jaded* because of Cindy & George Anthonys' actions, so I can understand how some monkeys feel about MB and the ABC special.

Not that I agree, but I certainly understand.



Leroy ... you are one class act.  You know how to respectfully disagree with another's opinion.  Thank you.

I was taught a lesson by my parents and ... I passed this lesson on to my now grown children ... "It is not what you say ... it is how you say it" that will determine the response.

I am getting so sick as well as discouraged of being bashed by a few on this forum for not blindly giving Josh and Melissa Baum a free pass in regards to their actions and motives.

Until the truth is known what happened to Lindsy Baum ...

Janet

 




Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3 7/28/09 -
Post by: Scandi on August 13, 2009, 02:06:17 PM
Thanks No Rose for your reply and I'm hoping we can learn more about this man.  xox


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3 7/28/09 -
Post by: Tamikosmom on August 13, 2009, 02:15:54 PM
Thanks No Rose for your reply and I'm hoping we can learn more about this man.  xox

I agree Scandi.  There is a little girl missing and ... ALL avenues of speculation must be persued.

I would appreciate being informed of the reasons behind research on Allen other than he was let go from his position within two weeks of Lindsey's disappearance.  Why was he singled out for speculation as a possible person of interest?  Is he a sex offender?  Did he have a past connection with Lindsey?  Did he have a connection with Lindsey on the day she disappeared?

Thanks

Janet


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3 7/28/09 -
Post by: Sister on August 13, 2009, 02:17:04 PM
Leroy, I agree about being jaded because of the Ants.  However, their actions in public have assuredly been different the Melissa's, but you're right, we're blessed to live in a free country.

I agree Sister   ::MonkeyWink:: 

bumped


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3 7/28/09 -
Post by: KarmaRoundUp on August 13, 2009, 02:18:02 PM

http://www.king5.com/localnews/stories/NW_081209WAB-lindsey-baum-mom-KS.d38b630d.html
The article above won't let me copy but Melissa Baum is going to NY for this program below.A poster somewhere is saying Michelle Bart is affiliated with this program but I haven't found any links connecting her to this program....yet.

<snipped>


Karma ... please remind me.  Who is Michelle Bart?

Thanks

Janet

+++++++

Missing McCleary girl's mom heading to NY
06:20 PM PDT on Wednesday, August 12, 2009
By DREW MIKKELSEN / KING 5 News


McCLEARY, Wash. - The mother of a girl missing since June is going to New York City to raise awareness about missing children.

Melissa Baum will be part of the “Amber Ready Back to School Safety Weekend” starting Friday in Times Square. Amber Ready is a company that produces DNA and fingerprint kits for children.

Baum’s 10-year-old daughter Lindsey vanished June 26. Lindsey was last seen walking home from a friend’s house. Police have not found her or anyone who knows what happened to her.

“I know she’s alive,” said Melissa Baum, who refuses to give up hope her daughter will be found safe.

Melissa Baum just bought school supplies for Lindsey. She’s supposed to start school as a sixth grader later this summer

A $10,000 reward is being offered to anyone who helps police locate Lindsey.

The reward started as a $6,000 offer, but an anonymous donor raised it to $10,000.

“There are people out there that really do care,” said Melissa Baum.

http://www.king5.com/localnews/stories/NW_081209WAB-lindsey-baum-mom-KS.d38b630d.html


 
Sorry it took me so long to reply,I got busy and left my puter.

Michelle Bart was the anthony's spokes person for a while.I think she is connected to the Never Lose Hope Foundation.Anyway,to me she is a people user who inserts herself into missing children cases....all for a profit.


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3 7/28/09 -
Post by: love4ever on August 13, 2009, 02:18:45 PM
Okay, I'm stealing Muffy's line for a minute...

"Everyone is entitled to his own opinion, but not his own facts." ~ Daniel Patrick Moynihan


There are several of us that are *jaded* because of Cindy & George Anthonys' actions, so I can understand how some monkeys feel about MB and the ABC special.

Not that I agree, but I certainly understand.




ok sweet Leroy



Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3 7/28/09 -
Post by: Tamikosmom on August 13, 2009, 02:21:02 PM

http://www.king5.com/localnews/stories/NW_081209WAB-lindsey-baum-mom-KS.d38b630d.html
The article above won't let me copy but Melissa Baum is going to NY for this program below.A poster somewhere is saying Michelle Bart is affiliated with this program but I haven't found any links connecting her to this program....yet.

<snipped>


Karma ... please remind me.  Who is Michelle Bart?

Thanks

Janet

+++++++

Missing McCleary girl's mom heading to NY
06:20 PM PDT on Wednesday, August 12, 2009
By DREW MIKKELSEN / KING 5 News


McCLEARY, Wash. - The mother of a girl missing since June is going to New York City to raise awareness about missing children.

Melissa Baum will be part of the “Amber Ready Back to School Safety Weekend” starting Friday in Times Square. Amber Ready is a company that produces DNA and fingerprint kits for children.

Baum’s 10-year-old daughter Lindsey vanished June 26. Lindsey was last seen walking home from a friend’s house. Police have not found her or anyone who knows what happened to her.

“I know she’s alive,” said Melissa Baum, who refuses to give up hope her daughter will be found safe.

Melissa Baum just bought school supplies for Lindsey. She’s supposed to start school as a sixth grader later this summer

A $10,000 reward is being offered to anyone who helps police locate Lindsey.

The reward started as a $6,000 offer, but an anonymous donor raised it to $10,000.

“There are people out there that really do care,” said Melissa Baum.

http://www.king5.com/localnews/stories/NW_081209WAB-lindsey-baum-mom-KS.d38b630d.html


 
Sorry it took me so long to reply,I got busy and left my puter.

Michelle Bart was the anthony's spokes person for a while.I think she is connected to the Never Lose Hope Foundation.Anyway,to me she is a people user who inserts herself into missing children cases....all for a profit.

Thanks Karma.

Janet


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3 7/28/09 -
Post by: love4ever on August 13, 2009, 02:22:20 PM
Leroy, I agree about being jaded because of the Ants.  However, their actions in public have assuredly been different the Melissa's, but you're right, we're blessed to live in a free country.


and that is all we have, the persona's of people via the net, not in the physical, and if we have no incline/intuition about how to profile ones personality we will only be left in wonder...


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3 7/28/09 -
Post by: KarmaRoundUp on August 13, 2009, 02:23:56 PM
My hinky meter is going off as well, I do hope that Melissa isn't being taken advantage of  ::MonkeyMad::
Remember Michelle Bart had Melissa on that talk radio show a while back?

I really don't care where Melissa gets media attention for missing Lindsey.....get it where ever you can but I hope Melissa(or someone who knows her)will not get taken advantage of by someone like Michelle Bart.


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3 7/28/09 -
Post by: Leroy on August 13, 2009, 02:25:25 PM
Okay, I'm stealing Muffy's line for a minute...

"Everyone is entitled to his own opinion, but not his own facts." ~ Daniel Patrick Moynihan


There are several of us that are *jaded* because of Cindy & George Anthonys' actions, so I can understand how some monkeys feel about MB and the ABC special.

Not that I agree, but I certainly understand.



Leroy ... you are one class act.  You know how to respectfully disagree with another's opinion.  Thank you.

I was taught a lesson by my parents and ... I passed this lesson on to my now grown children ... "It is not what you say ... it is how you say it" that will determine the response.

I am getting so sick as well as discouraged of being bashed by a few on this forum for not blindly giving Josh and Melissa Baum a free pass in regards to their actions and motives.

Until the truth is known what happened to Lindsy Baum ...

Janet



Well thank you Janet...my mom taught me along those same lines   ::MonkeyAngel:: 

I wish we had some news on this case...I think the lack of news has everyones emotions running high. 


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3 7/28/09 -
Post by: no rose colored glasses on August 13, 2009, 02:27:19 PM
Thanks No Rose for your reply and I'm hoping we can learn more about this man.  xox

I agree Scandi.  There is a little girl missing and ... ALL avenues of speculation must be persued.

I would appreciate being informed of the reasons behind research on Allen other than he was let go from his position within two weeks of Lindsey's disappearance.  Why was he singled out for speculation as a possible person of interest?  Is he a sex offender?  Did he have a past connection with Lindsey?  Did he have a connection with Lindsey on the day she disappeared?

Thanks

Janet
I don't know anything about this guy besides what we discussed earlier, and then we stopped discussing him so I don't know if he was ever investigated in the disappearance or what exactly all happened with this man.


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3 7/28/09 -
Post by: no rose colored glasses on August 13, 2009, 02:28:48 PM
My hinky meter is going off as well, I do hope that Melissa isn't being taken advantage of  ::MonkeyMad::
Remember Michelle Bart had Melissa on that talk radio show a while back?

I really don't care where Melissa gets media attention for missing Lindsey.....get it where ever you can but I hope Melissa(or someone who knows her)will not get taken advantage of by someone like Michelle Bart.
This old mind is going  ::MonkeyConfused:: I forgot about that, thanks.


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3 7/28/09 -
Post by: Sister on August 13, 2009, 02:29:05 PM
My hinky meter is going off as well, I do hope that Melissa isn't being taken advantage of  ::MonkeyMad::
Remember Michelle Bart had Melissa on that talk radio show a while back?

I really don't care where Melissa gets media attention for missing Lindsey.....get it where ever you can but I hope Melissa(or someone who knows her)will not get taken advantage of by someone like Michelle Bart.

KarmaR, I agree, the attention needs to come.  I hope Melissa doesn't get taken advantage of either . . .


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3 7/28/09 -
Post by: love4ever on August 13, 2009, 02:29:12 PM
Okay, I'm stealing Muffy's line for a minute...

"Everyone is entitled to his own opinion, but not his own facts." ~ Daniel Patrick Moynihan


There are several of us that are *jaded* because of Cindy & George Anthonys' actions, so I can understand how some monkeys feel about MB and the ABC special.

Not that I agree, but I certainly understand.



Leroy ... you are one class act.  You know how to respectfully disagree with another's opinion.  Thank you.

I was taught a lesson by my parents and ... I passed this lesson on to my now grown children ... "It is not what you say ... it is how you say it" that will determine the response.

I am getting so sick as well as discouraged of being bashed by a few on this forum for not blindly giving Josh and Melissa Baum a free pass in regards to their actions and motives.

Until the truth is known what happened to Lindsy Baum ...

Janet

 



Something you are very good at...


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3 7/28/09 -
Post by: KarmaRoundUp on August 13, 2009, 02:29:20 PM
http://www.king5.com/localnews/stories/NW_081209WAB-lindsey-baum-mom-KS.d38b630d.html
The article above won't let me copy but Melissa Baum is going to NY for this program below.A poster somewhere is saying Michelle Bart is affiliated with this program but I haven't found any links connecting her to this program....yet.

Free Music Concerts at 'AMBER Ready Back-to-School Weekend at ABC Studios' Live in Times Square, NY
Newswire Services July 30, 2009Grammy Nominee Trey Songz, Bad Boy's Day 26, Doug E. Fresh, Toby Love & More, Professional Athletes, Celebrity Guests, Virtual Strolling Entertainment, Food & Prizes

August 15-16, 2009, noon - 9 p.m.

ROCKAWAY, N.J. -- This fall, 50 million of America's children will return to school. By summer, 1 million of them will be classified as missing or abducted. In an effort to reduce the number of missing and abducted children, and to quickly recover those that are classified as such, AMBER Ready, Inc. and the AMBER Ready Foundation will launch the nation's first wireless child protection service and community predator program at the AMBER Ready Back To School Safety Weekend at ABC Studios, live in Times Square, August 14-16, 2009.
More info at link:

http://www.californiachronicle.com/articles/view/112380

Here is the Amber Ready Back To School Safety website.

http://www.amberready.com/

Info from above site:

AMBER Ready NewsWire

AMBER Ready

Back-to-School Safety Weekend
at ABC Studios,

Times Square, New York, NY
August 14th, 15th, 16th


For VIP Access Click Here


My hinky meter is up as it is listed on left under community events.  http://nationalvigilforhope.org/?page_id=2
I know they have at least one gig similiar to the Amber Ready.  Wonder how long Amber Ready has been around........
Stupido Michelle Bart.

Michelle Bart, owner of Helping Heroes Productions, who once had a voice for missing toddler Caylee Anthony and her grandparents, started the National Vigil For Hope while searching for Caylee in 2008.  Bart has always been aware of the importance of bringing home missing children, but the search for Caylee Marie Anthony was a wake up call.  Despite the nature or circumstance of how a child [or person] goes missing, one thing should never be questioned: the person must be found and brought home and most importantly, NO ONE should ever give up HOPE.



Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3 7/28/09 -
Post by: Tamikosmom on August 13, 2009, 02:29:45 PM

Okay, I'm stealing Muffy's line for a minute...

"Everyone is entitled to his own opinion, but not his own facts." ~ Daniel Patrick Moynihan


There are several of us that are *jaded* because of Cindy & George Anthonys' actions, so I can understand how some monkeys feel about MB and the ABC special.

Not that I agree, but I certainly understand.



Leroy ... you are one class act.  You know how to respectfully disagree with another's opinion.  Thank you.

I was taught a lesson by my parents and ... I passed this lesson on to my now grown children ... "It is not what you say ... it is how you say it" that will determine the response.

I am getting so sick as well as discouraged of being bashed by a few on this forum for not blindly giving Josh and Melissa Baum a free pass in regards to their actions and motives.

Until the truth is known what happened to Lindsy Baum ...

Janet



Well thank you Janet...my mom taught me along those same lines   ::MonkeyAngel:: 

I wish we had some news on this case...I think the lack of news has everyones emotions running high. 


I agree.

 ::MonkeyWaa::

Janet


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3 7/28/09 -
Post by: Leroy on August 13, 2009, 02:30:54 PM
Okay, I'm stealing Muffy's line for a minute...

"Everyone is entitled to his own opinion, but not his own facts." ~ Daniel Patrick Moynihan


There are several of us that are *jaded* because of Cindy & George Anthonys' actions, so I can understand how some monkeys feel about MB and the ABC special.

Not that I agree, but I certainly understand.




ok sweet Leroy



not sure what you mean by that   


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3 7/28/09 -
Post by: love4ever on August 13, 2009, 02:32:33 PM
Okay, I'm stealing Muffy's line for a minute...

"Everyone is entitled to his own opinion, but not his own facts." ~ Daniel Patrick Moynihan


There are several of us that are *jaded* because of Cindy & George Anthonys' actions, so I can understand how some monkeys feel about MB and the ABC special.

Not that I agree, but I certainly understand.




ok sweet Leroy



not sure what you mean by that   


I meant thank you for putting things into perspective, I am off of here, I need to research now


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3 7/28/09 -
Post by: KarmaRoundUp on August 13, 2009, 02:33:39 PM
Maybe I'm being overly-antagonistic, but perhaps someone local should remind King5 and other media outlets that the "missing mccleary girl" has a name- it's Lindsey Baum and she's only 11 years old. Her name should be reported in headlines at every opportunity. She shouldn't be referred to generically.
ITA Jess

I borrowed these links to local media from....somewhere.
 

http://seattletimes.nwsource.com/fla...contactus.html

http://www.heraldnet.com/section/contact

http://www.thenewstribune.com/aboutus/newsroom/staff/

http://**/newspap..._us/directory/

http://www.king5.com/contact/

http://www.kirotv.com/contact/index.html

http://www.komonews.com/about/contact

http://www.q13fox.com/about/


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3 7/28/09 -
Post by: Tamikosmom on August 13, 2009, 02:34:15 PM
Thanks No Rose for your reply and I'm hoping we can learn more about this man.  xox

I agree Scandi.  There is a little girl missing and ... ALL avenues of speculation must be persued.

I would appreciate being informed of the reasons behind research on Allen other than he was let go from his position within two weeks of Lindsey's disappearance.  Why was he singled out for speculation as a possible person of interest?  Is he a sex offender?  Did he have a past connection with Lindsey?  Did he have a connection with Lindsey on the day she disappeared?

Thanks

Janet
I don't know anything about this guy besides what we discussed earlier, and then we stopped discussing him so I don't know if he was ever investigated in the disappearance or what exactly all happened with this man.

I will use the SM trusty search engine and attempt to find the previous dialogue.

Thank you.

Janet


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3 7/28/09 -
Post by: no rose colored glasses on August 13, 2009, 02:36:29 PM
 Thank-you  ::MonkeyCool::


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3 7/28/09 -
Post by: Sister on August 13, 2009, 02:37:44 PM
http://www.king5.com/localnews/stories/NW_081209WAB-lindsey-baum-mom-KS.d38b630d.html
The article above won't let me copy but Melissa Baum is going to NY for this program below.A poster somewhere is saying Michelle Bart is affiliated with this program but I haven't found any links connecting her to this program....yet.

Free Music Concerts at 'AMBER Ready Back-to-School Weekend at ABC Studios' Live in Times Square, NY
Newswire Services July 30, 2009Grammy Nominee Trey Songz, Bad Boy's Day 26, Doug E. Fresh, Toby Love & More, Professional Athletes, Celebrity Guests, Virtual Strolling Entertainment, Food & Prizes

August 15-16, 2009, noon - 9 p.m.

ROCKAWAY, N.J. -- This fall, 50 million of America's children will return to school. By summer, 1 million of them will be classified as missing or abducted. In an effort to reduce the number of missing and abducted children, and to quickly recover those that are classified as such, AMBER Ready, Inc. and the AMBER Ready Foundation will launch the nation's first wireless child protection service and community predator program at the AMBER Ready Back To School Safety Weekend at ABC Studios, live in Times Square, August 14-16, 2009.
More info at link:

http://www.californiachronicle.com/articles/view/112380

Here is the Amber Ready Back To School Safety website.

http://www.amberready.com/

Info from above site:

AMBER Ready NewsWire

AMBER Ready

Back-to-School Safety Weekend
at ABC Studios,

Times Square, New York, NY
August 14th, 15th, 16th


For VIP Access Click Here


My hinky meter is up as it is listed on left under community events.  http://nationalvigilforhope.org/?page_id=2
I know they have at least one gig similiar to the Amber Ready.  Wonder how long Amber Ready has been around........
Stupido Michelle Bart.

Michelle Bart, owner of Helping Heroes Productions, who once had a voice for missing toddler Caylee Anthony and her grandparents, started the National Vigil For Hope while searching for Caylee in 2008.  Bart has always been aware of the importance of bringing home missing children, but the search for Caylee Marie Anthony was a wake up call.  Despite the nature or circumstance of how a child [or person] goes missing, one thing should never be questioned: the person must be found and brought home and most importantly, NO ONE should ever give up HOPE.


Karma, o/t IIRC Bart is back helping the Ants.


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3 7/28/09 -
Post by: Sister on August 13, 2009, 02:40:44 PM
Okay, I'm stealing Muffy's line for a minute...

"Everyone is entitled to his own opinion, but not his own facts." ~ Daniel Patrick Moynihan

There are several of us that are *jaded* because of Cindy & George Anthonys' actions, so I can understand how some monkeys feel about MB and the ABC special.

Not that I agree, but I certainly understand.


ok sweet Leroy


not sure what you mean by that   

"Blessed are the peacemakers . . ."  that's you Leroy and it is a fine quality!


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3 7/28/09 -
Post by: KarmaRoundUp on August 13, 2009, 02:41:41 PM

http://www.king5.com/localnews/stories/NW_081209WAB-lindsey-baum-mom-KS.d38b630d.html
The article above won't let me copy but Melissa Baum is going to NY for this program below.A poster somewhere is saying Michelle Bart is affiliated with this program but I haven't found any links connecting her to this program....yet.

<snipped>


Karma ... please remind me.  Who is Michelle Bart?

Thanks

Janet

+++++++

Missing McCleary girl's mom heading to NY
06:20 PM PDT on Wednesday, August 12, 2009
By DREW MIKKELSEN / KING 5 News


McCLEARY, Wash. - The mother of a girl missing since June is going to New York City to raise awareness about missing children.

Melissa Baum will be part of the “Amber Ready Back to School Safety Weekend” starting Friday in Times Square. Amber Ready is a company that produces DNA and fingerprint kits for children.

Baum’s 10-year-old daughter Lindsey vanished June 26. Lindsey was last seen walking home from a friend’s house. Police have not found her or anyone who knows what happened to her.

“I know she’s alive,” said Melissa Baum, who refuses to give up hope her daughter will be found safe.

Melissa Baum just bought school supplies for Lindsey. She’s supposed to start school as a sixth grader later this summer

A $10,000 reward is being offered to anyone who helps police locate Lindsey.

The reward started as a $6,000 offer, but an anonymous donor raised it to $10,000.

“There are people out there that really do care,” said Melissa Baum.

http://www.king5.com/localnews/stories/NW_081209WAB-lindsey-baum-mom-KS.d38b630d.html


 
Sorry it took me so long to reply,I got busy and left my puter.

Michelle Bart was the anthony's spokes person for a while.I think she is connected to the Never Lose Hope Foundation.Anyway,to me she is a people user who inserts herself into missing children cases....all for a profit.

Thanks Karma.

Janet

You're welcome hunny bunny    ::MonkeyWink::


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3 7/28/09 -
Post by: KarmaRoundUp on August 13, 2009, 02:47:07 PM
My hinky meter is going off as well, I do hope that Melissa isn't being taken advantage of  ::MonkeyMad::
Remember Michelle Bart had Melissa on that talk radio show a while back?

I really don't care where Melissa gets media attention for missing Lindsey.....get it where ever you can but I hope Melissa(or someone who knows her)will not get taken advantage of by someone like Michelle Bart.
This old mind is going  ::MonkeyConfused:: I forgot about that, thanks.
You're welcome NoRose.
I think Michelle Bart was a stand in host for that show.Anyway,it doesn't matter.....as long as Melissa gets some kind of media attention out there for Lindsey.I sure hope someone close to Melissa is aware of Michelle Bart,I would hate to see Melissa get taken advantage of.I really feel for Melissa and her family,this is so heartbreaking.


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3 7/28/09 -
Post by: Tamikosmom on August 13, 2009, 02:53:24 PM
MICHELLE BART - ANTHONY'S SPOKESPERSON

It appears that Michelle Bart ceased being the spokesperson for the Anthony's following the discovery of Caylee Marie's remains.

Janet

++++++


Bart Out As Family Spokeswoman
Sunday, December 14, 2008 11:43:24 PM


ORLANDO -- Orange County sheriff's officials said the evidence is mounting that the skeletal remains of a small child found Thursday may belong to Caylee Anthony.

Investigators were out Sunday for the fourth day of searching a wooded area near the Anthony home where the remains were first found, hoping to discover more clues to determine if they are the missing 3-year-old.

Get Up-To-The-Minute Updates On The Remans Discovery

Michelle Bart announced she will no longer be the Anthony's spokeswoman.  Bart said she was giving up the position because of medical reasons. Bart made the announcement Sunday night at Eastside Baptist Church.  It's the same church where family members and supporters normally held weekly candlelight vigils for Caylee Anthony.  However, this week's vigil was cancelled.

George and Cindy Anthony's new attorney Bradley Conway will now be the family's primary spokesman.

On Saturday, Bart said the family is suspicious of the circumstances leading to the findings.

"It's been searched dry, it's been searched wet, it's been searched in between. It's been searched over by Tim Miller [of Texas EquuSearch] twice, who we hold in high regards with his professional organization," Bart told News 13.

The FBI is looking at DNA from the remains, but the Orange County medical examiner said it could be a week before conclusive results are released.

Sheriff Kevin Beary told the defense team for Casey Anthony, the missing girl's mother who has been charged with her murder, the size of the bones and hair color of the remains match Caylee

http://www.cfnews13.com/News/Local/2008/12/14/is_it_caylee_anthonys_suspicious.htm


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3 7/28/09 -
Post by: KarmaRoundUp on August 13, 2009, 02:54:11 PM
Thanks No Rose for your reply and I'm hoping we can learn more about this man.  xox

I agree Scandi.  There is a little girl missing and ... ALL avenues of speculation must be persued.

I would appreciate being informed of the reasons behind research on Allen other than he was let go from his position within two weeks of Lindsey's disappearance.  Why was he singled out for speculation as a possible person of interest?  Is he a sex offender?  Did he have a past connection with Lindsey?  Did he have a connection with Lindsey on the day she disappeared?

Thanks

Janet
I don't know anything about this guy besides what we discussed earlier, and then we stopped discussing him so I don't know if he was ever investigated in the disappearance or what exactly all happened with this man.

I will use the SM trusty search engine and attempt to find the previous dialogue.

Thank you.

Janet
Janet,the rumor/gossip going around about this Allen guy was he is a older guy who worked at the campgrounds,he was fired and his computer taken all in one day at the park/campground.His fellow employees didn't even know what was going on.He is rumored to have a daughter that knows and was friends with Lindsey.Someone at another web site knew someone who worked in this park/campground and this is the info they were posting.Now I haven't read anything else about this guy.No one really knew his full name(that I know of)so we were all just guessing if he was on a SO list somewhere.I think that's all I remember.


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3 7/28/09 -
Post by: KarmaRoundUp on August 13, 2009, 02:57:43 PM
http://www.king5.com/localnews/stories/NW_081209WAB-lindsey-baum-mom-KS.d38b630d.html
The article above won't let me copy but Melissa Baum is going to NY for this program below.A poster somewhere is saying Michelle Bart is affiliated with this program but I haven't found any links connecting her to this program....yet.

Free Music Concerts at 'AMBER Ready Back-to-School Weekend at ABC Studios' Live in Times Square, NY
Newswire Services July 30, 2009Grammy Nominee Trey Songz, Bad Boy's Day 26, Doug E. Fresh, Toby Love & More, Professional Athletes, Celebrity Guests, Virtual Strolling Entertainment, Food & Prizes

August 15-16, 2009, noon - 9 p.m.

ROCKAWAY, N.J. -- This fall, 50 million of America's children will return to school. By summer, 1 million of them will be classified as missing or abducted. In an effort to reduce the number of missing and abducted children, and to quickly recover those that are classified as such, AMBER Ready, Inc. and the AMBER Ready Foundation will launch the nation's first wireless child protection service and community predator program at the AMBER Ready Back To School Safety Weekend at ABC Studios, live in Times Square, August 14-16, 2009.
More info at link:

http://www.californiachronicle.com/articles/view/112380

Here is the Amber Ready Back To School Safety website.

http://www.amberready.com/

Info from above site:

AMBER Ready NewsWire

AMBER Ready

Back-to-School Safety Weekend
at ABC Studios,

Times Square, New York, NY
August 14th, 15th, 16th


For VIP Access Click Here


My hinky meter is up as it is listed on left under community events.  http://nationalvigilforhope.org/?page_id=2
I know they have at least one gig similiar to the Amber Ready.  Wonder how long Amber Ready has been around........
Stupido Michelle Bart.

Michelle Bart, owner of Helping Heroes Productions, who once had a voice for missing toddler Caylee Anthony and her grandparents, started the National Vigil For Hope while searching for Caylee in 2008.  Bart has always been aware of the importance of bringing home missing children, but the search for Caylee Marie Anthony was a wake up call.  Despite the nature or circumstance of how a child [or person] goes missing, one thing should never be questioned: the person must be found and brought home and most importantly, NO ONE should ever give up HOPE.


Karma, o/t IIRC Bart is back helping the Ants.
Thanks for the info Sister
The anthonys and Michelle Bart deserve eachother IMO
I wonder if the anthonys and nokidfinders will be in NY too?After all ABC(the anthonys beloved media station)is sponsoring this upcoming event.


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3 7/28/09 -
Post by: Leroy on August 13, 2009, 02:58:31 PM


"Blessed are the peacemakers . . ."  that's you Leroy and it is a fine quality!

Thanks Sister...i was afraid that post came out wrong.  I really do value everyone's opinions, thoughts and theories and I am just really frustrated that some answers to some simple questions would clear up alot of things for us Monkeys.

 ::MonkeyAngel:: 


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3 7/28/09 -
Post by: Tamikosmom on August 13, 2009, 02:59:05 PM
MICHELLE BART - KIDFINDER'S SPOKESPERSON

Renewed Effort Begins To Find Caylee Alive
POSTED: 6:35 am EST November 17, 2008
UPDATED: 5:06 pm EST November 17, 2008


Meanwhile, the Kid Finders Network is working hard to find Caylee.

George and Cindy Anthony spent the weekend at the group's headquarters on Goldenrod Road handing out flyers and other information about their granddaughter.

They also worked to get the word out about other missing children from the area.

"George and Cindy Anthony are so driven to bring home every child. There is no handbook to teach you what to do in this situation when faced with this kind of devastation to a family, and they have been wonderful," Kid Finders Network spokeswoman Michelle Bart said.

The Kid Finders Network has set up a location to spread the word about missing children along Goldenrod Road near state Road 50. They'll be there Thursday through Tuesday between 10 a.m. and 4 p.m. until the end of December.

http://www.wesh.com/news/17996076/detail.html



Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3 7/28/09 -
Post by: KarmaRoundUp on August 13, 2009, 03:03:13 PM
MICHELLE BART - ANTHONY'S SPOKESPERSON

It appears that Michelle Bart ceased being the spokesperson for the Anthony's following the discovery of Caylee Marie's remains.

Janet

++++++


Bart Out As Family Spokeswoman
Sunday, December 14, 2008 11:43:24 PM


ORLANDO -- Orange County sheriff's officials said the evidence is mounting that the skeletal remains of a small child found Thursday may belong to Caylee Anthony.

Investigators were out Sunday for the fourth day of searching a wooded area near the Anthony home where the remains were first found, hoping to discover more clues to determine if they are the missing 3-year-old.

Get Up-To-The-Minute Updates On The Remans Discovery

Michelle Bart announced she will no longer be the Anthony's spokeswoman.  Bart said she was giving up the position because of medical reasons. Bart made the announcement Sunday night at Eastside Baptist Church.  It's the same church where family members and supporters normally held weekly candlelight vigils for Caylee Anthony.  However, this week's vigil was cancelled.

George and Cindy Anthony's new attorney Bradley Conway will now be the family's primary spokesman.

On Saturday, Bart said the family is suspicious of the circumstances leading to the findings.

"It's been searched dry, it's been searched wet, it's been searched in between. It's been searched over by Tim Miller [of Texas EquuSearch] twice, who we hold in high regards with his professional organization," Bart told News 13.


The FBI is looking at DNA from the remains, but the Orange County medical examiner said it could be a week before conclusive results are released.

Sheriff Kevin Beary told the defense team for Casey Anthony, the missing girl's mother who has been charged with her murder, the size of the bones and hair color of the remains match Caylee

http://www.cfnews13.com/News/Local/2008/12/14/is_it_caylee_anthonys_suspicious.htm

Thanks Janet
See what we mean?Michelle stepped out from the anthonys but still has to dog out anyone who was really searching for sweet Caylee.
Michelle Bart=Ghetto witch


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3 7/28/09 -
Post by: Sister on August 13, 2009, 03:08:09 PM
MICHELLE BART - ANTHONY'S SPOKESPERSON

It appears that Michelle Bart ceased being the spokesperson for the Anthony's following the discovery of Caylee Marie's remains.

Janet

++++++


Bart Out As Family Spokeswoman
Sunday, December 14, 2008 11:43:24 PM


ORLANDO -- Orange County sheriff's officials said the evidence is mounting that the skeletal remains of a small child found Thursday may belong to Caylee Anthony.

Investigators were out Sunday for the fourth day of searching a wooded area near the Anthony home where the remains were first found, hoping to discover more clues to determine if they are the missing 3-year-old.

Get Up-To-The-Minute Updates On The Remans Discovery

Michelle Bart announced she will no longer be the Anthony's spokeswoman.  Bart said she was giving up the position because of medical reasons. Bart made the announcement Sunday night at Eastside Baptist Church.  It's the same church where family members and supporters normally held weekly candlelight vigils for Caylee Anthony.  However, this week's vigil was cancelled.

George and Cindy Anthony's new attorney Bradley Conway will now be the family's primary spokesman.

On Saturday, Bart said the family is suspicious of the circumstances leading to the findings.

"It's been searched dry, it's been searched wet, it's been searched in between. It's been searched over by Tim Miller [of Texas EquuSearch] twice, who we hold in high regards with his professional organization," Bart told News 13.


The FBI is looking at DNA from the remains, but the Orange County medical examiner said it could be a week before conclusive results are released.

Sheriff Kevin Beary told the defense team for Casey Anthony, the missing girl's mother who has been charged with her murder, the size of the bones and hair color of the remains match Caylee

http://www.cfnews13.com/News/Local/2008/12/14/is_it_caylee_anthonys_suspicious.htm

Thanks Janet
See what we mean?Michelle stepped out from the anthonys but still has to dog out anyone who was really searching for sweet Caylee.
Michelle Bart=Ghetto witch

Contrary to the posted news articles, she IS involved with the Ants still.  She just took a different approach, business wise.  That's all I'm saying.  Anyway, Melissa needs our help in bringing Lindsey home.


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3 7/28/09 -
Post by: Tamikosmom on August 13, 2009, 03:35:39 PM
Considering Michelle Bart ... whose motives we all agree are suspect ... has taken Melissa Baum under her wing for the New York ABC special ... I contend this relationship is not a non-issue ... it should be monitored closely.

Janet


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3 7/28/09 -
Post by: pink angel on August 13, 2009, 04:06:52 PM
Amber Ready is NOT a charity or organization. It's selling safety ID kits. It's one of the many organizations running off of parents fears.

The AMBER Ready Program is the fastest means of enabling law enforcement agencies to aid in the recovery of your child should they ever become missing. Your children’s Wireless Phone Profiles can be locked into your wireless phone with descriptive data and photos. The program provides parents with the following child recovery and safety tools:

    * The Wireless Phone Profile Program (Details)
    * Profile Backup for Replacement Phones (Details)
    * 24-Hour Alert & Police Support (Details)
    * DNA and Child Fingerprinting Kit (Details)
    * Emergency Car Charger for Existing Wireless Phone* (Details)
    * Child Safety DVD with Emergency Instructions & Tips* (Details)
    * Child Internet Safety Web Browser (Details)
    * Backpack Tags and Door Stickers (Details)
    * 1000 Free Missing Child Posters (If Your Child is Missing)

Subscribers that elect to receive the Free Sponsorship Rebate Program will also receive a Free or Discounted Camera and Picture Messaging Phone of their choice with their contract renewal or new wireless account activation. (Details)

50 bucks for 2 year membership.

You know - My personal opinion, but i wouldn't give an internet company information on my child, complete with address, photo, etc.  Who is to say an employee won't abduct your child? 
You can go to local police station in most cities and have your child fingerprinted and do all this yourself.  If you are a good parent you don't need to bet against yourself for a phone and fliers, etc.   If you child goes missing, God forbid - I think companies and communities would help you get this and more.  And a monkey will probably have a website, myspace and facebook up within the hour!

Bart does nothing for free -- she is connected to Milstead through the Anthonys.  And yes, even in country communities, the local sheriff's dept and local State Police have programs for free identification.  They prey on the fears -- Melissa Baum is very vunerable right now.  Prayers for her, Josh, and the family.

She has been hired as paid spokesperson by Amber's family. They are suppose to be on JVM issues tonight.

Michelle Bart Case Study: Amber Dubois, BringAmberHome.com - watch HLN's "Issues" with Jane Velez-Mitchell Thursday night and America's Most Wanted this Saturday to learn more about the case.


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3 7/28/09 -
Post by: pink angel on August 13, 2009, 04:14:03 PM
oops meant to add she is also spokesperson for missing Benjamin Kaiser-Griffin.


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3 7/28/09 -
Post by: KarmaRoundUp on August 13, 2009, 04:32:55 PM
oops meant to add she is also spokesperson for missing Benjamin Kaiser-Griffin.
Thank you Pink.She sure does get around.


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3 7/28/09 -
Post by: A_News_Junkie_Monkey on August 13, 2009, 05:30:48 PM
MICHELLE BART - ANTHONY'S SPOKESPERSON

It appears that Michelle Bart ceased being the spokesperson for the Anthony's following the discovery of Caylee Marie's remains.

Janet

++++++


Bart Out As Family Spokeswoman
Sunday, December 14, 2008 11:43:24 PM


ORLANDO -- Orange County sheriff's officials said the evidence is mounting that the skeletal remains of a small child found Thursday may belong to Caylee Anthony.

Investigators were out Sunday for the fourth day of searching a wooded area near the Anthony home where the remains were first found, hoping to discover more clues to determine if they are the missing 3-year-old.

Get Up-To-The-Minute Updates On The Remans Discovery

Michelle Bart announced she will no longer be the Anthony's spokeswoman.  Bart said she was giving up the position because of medical reasons. Bart made the announcement Sunday night at Eastside Baptist Church.  It's the same church where family members and supporters normally held weekly candlelight vigils for Caylee Anthony.  However, this week's vigil was cancelled.

George and Cindy Anthony's new attorney Bradley Conway will now be the family's primary spokesman.

On Saturday, Bart said the family is suspicious of the circumstances leading to the findings.

"It's been searched dry, it's been searched wet, it's been searched in between. It's been searched over by Tim Miller [of Texas EquuSearch] twice, who we hold in high regards with his professional organization," Bart told News 13.


The FBI is looking at DNA from the remains, but the Orange County medical examiner said it could be a week before conclusive results are released.

Sheriff Kevin Beary told the defense team for Casey Anthony, the missing girl's mother who has been charged with her murder, the size of the bones and hair color of the remains match Caylee

http://www.cfnews13.com/News/Local/2008/12/14/is_it_caylee_anthonys_suspicious.htm

Thanks Janet
See what we mean?Michelle stepped out from the anthonys but still has to dog out anyone who was really searching for sweet Caylee.
Michelle Bart=Ghetto witch

Contrary to the posted news articles, she IS involved with the Ants still.  She just took a different approach, business wise.  That's all I'm saying.  Anyway, Melissa needs our help in bringing Lindsey home.

Agree.  Sounded that way to me on the blog radio show.


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3 7/28/09 -
Post by: sunshine12 on August 13, 2009, 05:43:57 PM
Hi all-

i have been so busy at work i feel like i haven't been keeping up with this thread like i should be..

where is lindsey? ugh i wish i knew the answer to that question


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3 7/28/09 -
Post by: Tamikosmom on August 13, 2009, 06:21:55 PM
Okay, I'm stealing Muffy's line for a minute...

"Everyone is entitled to his own opinion, but not his own facts." ~ Daniel Patrick Moynihan


There are several of us that are *jaded* because of Cindy & George Anthonys' actions, so I can understand how some monkeys feel about MB and the ABC special.

Not that I agree, but I certainly understand.



Leroy ... you are one class act.  You know how to respectfully disagree with another's opinion.  Thank you.

I was taught a lesson by my parents and ... I passed this lesson on to my now grown children ... "It is not what you say ... it is how you say it" that will determine the response.

I am getting so sick as well as discouraged of being bashed by a few on this forum for not blindly giving Josh and Melissa Baum a free pass in regards to their actions and motives.

Until the truth is known what happened to Lindsy Baum ...

Janet

 


Something you are very good at...

love4ever

I do believe I detect something called sarcasm.

Please link to one of my post that reveal disrespect to a poster who is not on the same page as me in regards to an issue..

I sincerely attempt to stop and consider my words on the forums and ... in my life.  In otherwords dialogue is where it is at.  However ... I concede there are times I fail in that attempt and ... if I have been disrespectful ... I apologize.

Janet
   


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3 7/28/09 -
Post by: Tamikosmom on August 13, 2009, 06:23:41 PM
I have no doubt that Melissa Baum is being used by Michelle Bart to further Bart's personal  agenda ... but I somehow believe that Melissa Baum also is going to benefit financially from this ABC special.  Think about George and Cindy Anthony and ... their network interviews.

I hope I am wrong.

Janet


Are u serious?

BUMPED


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3 7/28/09 -
Post by: Tamikosmom on August 13, 2009, 06:28:40 PM
Hi Grandma Karma ... I see ya in the rafters.

Papa and I are off to Disneyland tomorrow for about a week with two grandkids (6/8).

Grandparenting rocks!

 ::MonkeyCheer2::

I will say "hi" to Mickey and Minnie from all the Monkeys in the cage.

Janet


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3 7/28/09 -
Post by: KarmaRoundUp on August 13, 2009, 06:29:55 PM
Hi all-

i have been so busy at work i feel like i haven't been keeping up with this thread like i should be..

where is lindsey? ugh i wish i knew the answer to that question
Hi Sunshine


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3 7/28/09 -
Post by: no rose colored glasses on August 13, 2009, 06:31:59 PM
Have a good time at Disneyland Janet  ::MonkeyCool::


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3 7/28/09 -
Post by: KarmaRoundUp on August 13, 2009, 06:33:40 PM
Hi Grandma Karma ... I see ya in the rafters.

Papa and I are off to Disneyland tomorrow for about a week with two grandkids (6/8).

Grandparenting rocks!

 ::MonkeyCheer2::

I will say "hi" to Mickey and Minnie from all the Monkeys in the cage.

Janet
Hi Gramma Janet
Wow,that sounds like a fun and relaxing time for sure!
Make sure you wear those grand kids out so you all can sleep at night lol
Wish I was planning a vaca instead of a back to work.   ::MonkeyKiss::


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3 7/28/09 -
Post by: sunshine12 on August 13, 2009, 08:13:55 PM
janet-

i enjoy your posts. i think that people having differences of opinion can be a good thing. you are entitled to your opinions and i appreciate how you have taken the information we have been given from police (which is not much) and add it to your posts.  i wish we had more information to go on in this case.  i appreciate that you seem to be applying the ockham's razor theory and the information we have been given by police to form your opinions. you have very good points that i hope have been thoroughly looked at by police and continue to be explored.

i hope you have a safe trip to disneyland and enjoy the time with your grandkids!


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3 7/28/09 -
Post by: sunshine12 on August 13, 2009, 08:22:46 PM
i think that mlachester is a mixed bag of the truth and lies.  i know many people believe the theory that "once a liar always a liar" and if someone is lying about one thing then they must be lying about everything...but i dont know in this case.  either this woman is completely delusional (which is possible) or she's so mad and upset about lb missing, and is so certain that the mother or brother had something to do w/it because of insider knowledge she has on the family dynamic (possibly things lb has told her) that she's trying to make them look bad to the public.


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3 7/28/09 -
Post by: KarmaRoundUp on August 13, 2009, 08:41:36 PM
Have a good night you all.
Janet,have a fun and safe trip with the GKids and your hubby.
 ::MonkeyAngel::


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3 7/28/09 -
Post by: love4ever on August 13, 2009, 08:54:59 PM
I have no doubt that Melissa Baum is being used by Michelle Bart to further Bart's personal  agenda ... but I somehow believe that Melissa Baum also is going to benefit financially from this ABC special.  Think about George and Cindy Anthony and ... their network interviews.

I hope I am wrong.

Janet


Are u serious?

BUMPED

This will be my last post here, I will be researching with DD, it was nice working with some of you...Take care of you and yours, always


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3 7/28/09 -
Post by: mamacrazy30 on August 13, 2009, 08:55:59 PM
i think that mlachester is a mixed bag of the truth and lies.  i know many people believe the theory that "once a liar always a liar" and if someone is lying about one thing then they must be lying about everything...but i dont know in this case.  either this woman is completely delusional (which is possible) or she's so mad and upset about lb missing, and is so certain that the mother or brother had something to do w/it because of insider knowledge she has on the family dynamic (possibly things lb has told her) that she's trying to make them look bad to the public.
oh sunshine...i don't know...????  when i was 9 we moved from a fairly large city to a town with the population of 410.  i never fit in EVER...it didn't matter what i did...i wasn't from there and so there fori would never fit in...granted McCleary is slightly larger, but i'm afraid even at this day and age they have the same mind set...i'm thousands of miles away as i believe most of us here, yet we seem to care for her more than the town.   ::MonkeyConfused:: ::MonkeyNoNo::
one would assume in a town that small they (the towns people) would be up in arms, keeping their children at home etc..i mean holey comley they have a kidnapper in their mist...right?
something is rotten in the town of McCleary.


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3 7/28/09 -
Post by: mamacrazy30 on August 13, 2009, 08:57:12 PM
Have a good night you all.
Janet,have a fun and safe trip with the GKids and your hubby.
 ::MonkeyAngel::
sweet dreams Karma. ::MonkeyAngel::


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3 7/28/09 -
Post by: no rose colored glasses on August 13, 2009, 08:57:28 PM
I have no doubt that Melissa Baum is being used by Michelle Bart to further Bart's personal  agenda ... but I somehow believe that Melissa Baum also is going to benefit financially from this ABC special.  Think about George and Cindy Anthony and ... their network interviews.

I hope I am wrong.

Janet


Are u serious?

BUMPED

This will be my last post here, I will be researching with DD, it was nice working with some of you...Take care of you and yours, always
I'm sorry to hear that, but I understand, I sure would like for both of you to post, I enjoy your posts very much.  ::MonkeyCool::


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3 7/28/09 -
Post by: no rose colored glasses on August 13, 2009, 08:58:24 PM
i think that mlachester is a mixed bag of the truth and lies.  i know many people believe the theory that "once a liar always a liar" and if someone is lying about one thing then they must be lying about everything...but i dont know in this case.  either this woman is completely delusional (which is possible) or she's so mad and upset about lb missing, and is so certain that the mother or brother had something to do w/it because of insider knowledge she has on the family dynamic (possibly things lb has told her) that she's trying to make them look bad to the public.
oh sunshine...i don't know...????  when i was 9 we moved from a fairly large city to a town with the population of 410.  i never fit in EVER...it didn't matter what i did...i wasn't from there and so there fori would never fit in...granted McCleary is slightly larger, but i'm afraid even at this day and age they have the same mind set...i'm thousands of miles away as i believe most of us here, yet we seem to care for her more than the town.   ::MonkeyConfused:: ::MonkeyNoNo::
one would assume in a town that small they (the towns people) would be up in arms, keeping their children at home etc..i mean holey comley they have a kidnapper in their mist...right?
something is rotten in the town of McCleary.
Doesn't seem to make much sense does it?  ::MonkeyConfused::


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3 7/28/09 -
Post by: no rose colored glasses on August 14, 2009, 01:45:21 PM
Lindsey  ::MonkeyAngel::


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3 7/28/09 -
Post by: Haddie McFaddies Mom on August 14, 2009, 02:10:01 PM
Hi NRCG, All ~  This recent post addresses the Search Center for Lindsey and briefly touches on what the deal was with the space they thought they had lined up.  There are several posts that continue from this one, and are informative as to the efforts being taken TRYING to get this Center up and running.  Also talks about coordinating large group search efforts.

The info. definitely sounds legit and needs to be passed along, so thought I'd do my share ;)

Hello all,
I am a registered volunteer for the Laura Recovery Center and have been working with Melissa from the first week Lindsey went missing,
We did have a buidling in town to set up a recovery center the owner was excited at first and was going to donate it to us at no cost except the cost of insurance, elect, phones ect. I drove from Portland Oregon 3 days in a row to meet the owner to pick up the keys, the last day I was there he didn't show up I called him no answer so I called from Melissa's phone what do you know he answered! He said he was out of the loop on it and handed the phone to his girlfriend, she said after they talked about it they changed their minds and we could not use the building. I can't say their names but I can tell you it was the empty office space by the 5 cent store where the subway is on the main street.
(snipped)

http://boards.insessiontrials.com/showthread.php?t=355444&page=30 (http://boards.insessiontrials.com/showthread.php?t=355444&page=30)


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3 7/28/09 -
Post by: sherip on August 14, 2009, 02:24:24 PM
Sherip, I don't see any problem on your end as long as sales tax is paid. The manufacturer will need to determine if it could sell directly to buyers as the mfg would be responsible for collecting and remitting the tax.

Hope that helps.

It does help - Thanks

I got an email back late last night from the LindseyBaum.com center that said Melissa Baum is in New York right now attending something for missing children and that my offer would be passed on to her when she returns.

Extreme Vinyal Signs is not currently up and running so I have been looking for another resource to print banners. 


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3 7/28/09 -
Post by: canadianmonkey on August 14, 2009, 02:25:54 PM
Hi NRCG, All ~  This recent post addresses the Search Center for Lindsey and briefly touches on what the deal was with the space they thought they had lined up.  There are several posts that continue from this one, and are informative as to the efforts being taken TRYING to get this Center up and running.  Also talks about coordinating large group search efforts.

The info. definitely sounds legit and needs to be passed along, so thought I'd do my share ;)

Hello all,
I am a registered volunteer for the Laura Recovery Center and have been working with Melissa from the first week Lindsey went missing,
We did have a buidling in town to set up a recovery center the owner was excited at first and was going to donate it to us at no cost except the cost of insurance, elect, phones ect. I drove from Portland Oregon 3 days in a row to meet the owner to pick up the keys, the last day I was there he didn't show up I called him no answer so I called from Melissa's phone what do you know he answered! He said he was out of the loop on it and handed the phone to his girlfriend, she said after they talked about it they changed their minds and we could not use the building. I can't say their names but I can tell you it was the empty office space by the 5 cent store where the subway is on the main street.
(snipped)

http://boards.insessiontrials.com/showthread.php?t=355444&page=30 (http://boards.insessiontrials.com/showthread.php?t=355444&page=30)

I don't get it.  Who is threatening these people?  Why else would they change their minds after talking about it for days.  They were just about to pick up the keys....


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3 7/28/09 -
Post by: no rose colored glasses on August 14, 2009, 02:25:54 PM
Hi NRCG, All ~  This recent post addresses the Search Center for Lindsey and briefly touches on what the deal was with the space they thought they had lined up.  There are several posts that continue from this one, and are informative as to the efforts being taken TRYING to get this Center up and running.  Also talks about coordinating large group search efforts.

The info. definitely sounds legit and needs to be passed along, so thought I'd do my share ;)

Hello all,
I am a registered volunteer for the Laura Recovery Center and have been working with Melissa from the first week Lindsey went missing,
We did have a buidling in town to set up a recovery center the owner was excited at first and was going to donate it to us at no cost except the cost of insurance, elect, phones ect. I drove from Portland Oregon 3 days in a row to meet the owner to pick up the keys, the last day I was there he didn't show up I called him no answer so I called from Melissa's phone what do you know he answered! He said he was out of the loop on it and handed the phone to his girlfriend, she said after they talked about it they changed their minds and we could not use the building. I can't say their names but I can tell you it was the empty office space by the 5 cent store where the subway is on the main street.
(snipped)

http://boards.insessiontrials.com/showthread.php?t=355444&page=30 (http://boards.insessiontrials.com/showthread.php?t=355444&page=30)
Thank-you for that  ::MonkeyCool::  I have a question, what happened over on insessions that Lindsey's thread is no longer? Was there some bad fighting or something? I went to look yesterday and it was there but said never to any posts  ::MonkeyConfused::


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3 7/28/09 -
Post by: sherip on August 14, 2009, 02:35:08 PM
Sherip, I don't see any problem on your end as long as sales tax is paid. The manufacturer will need to determine if it could sell directly to buyers as the mfg would be responsible for collecting and remitting the tax.

Hope that helps.

Sherip - If you want to be really super safe on the use of the photo - I think her mom is who you need permission from.  The pic could have been posted without a permission to the myspace.  I think whomever took the photo owns the rights, but I would think if her mom said it is fine to use you would be good to go. 

And you have thought of city ordinances and all that.  Don't forget the utility companies the banner would hang on.  Say if you nailed it to a telephone pole - contact them first.
BRAVO on this idea!

Thank you for that input - I won't do anything without her mom's approval because I wouldnt want to create any additional heartache for anyone.  My thought was not to have them on utility lines but hanging from the on/off ramp overpass that you use to get into the City of McCleary off of the Hiway. When I say hanging it would be along the cement sides of the overpass if that makes sense.  A car would drive under it while traveling on the Highway so approaching McCleary in both directions they could read it.


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3 7/28/09 -
Post by: sherip on August 14, 2009, 02:49:31 PM
Hi NRCG, All ~  This recent post addresses the Search Center for Lindsey and briefly touches on what the deal was with the space they thought they had lined up.  There are several posts that continue from this one, and are informative as to the efforts being taken TRYING to get this Center up and running.  Also talks about coordinating large group search efforts.

The info. definitely sounds legit and needs to be passed along, so thought I'd do my share ;)

Hello all,
I am a registered volunteer for the Laura Recovery Center and have been working with Melissa from the first week Lindsey went missing,
We did have a buidling in town to set up a recovery center the owner was excited at first and was going to donate it to us at no cost except the cost of insurance, elect, phones ect. I drove from Portland Oregon 3 days in a row to meet the owner to pick up the keys, the last day I was there he didn't show up I called him no answer so I called from Melissa's phone what do you know he answered! He said he was out of the loop on it and handed the phone to his girlfriend, she said after they talked about it they changed their minds and we could not use the building. I can't say their names but I can tell you it was the empty office space by the 5 cent store where the subway is on the main street.
(snipped)

http://boards.insessiontrials.com/showthread.php?t=355444&page=30 (http://boards.insessiontrials.com/showthread.php?t=355444&page=30)
Thank-you for that  ::MonkeyCool::  I have a question, what happened over on insessions that Lindsey's thread is no longer? Was there some bad fighting or something? I went to look yesterday and it was there but said never to any posts  ::MonkeyConfused::

You have to go into the Amber Alerts/Missing People section and then you will find it again and it is being posted on.  I was confused by it at first too.


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3 7/28/09 -
Post by: no rose colored glasses on August 14, 2009, 03:28:17 PM
Hi NRCG, All ~  This recent post addresses the Search Center for Lindsey and briefly touches on what the deal was with the space they thought they had lined up.  There are several posts that continue from this one, and are informative as to the efforts being taken TRYING to get this Center up and running.  Also talks about coordinating large group search efforts.

The info. definitely sounds legit and needs to be passed along, so thought I'd do my share ;)

Hello all,
I am a registered volunteer for the Laura Recovery Center and have been working with Melissa from the first week Lindsey went missing,
We did have a buidling in town to set up a recovery center the owner was excited at first and was going to donate it to us at no cost except the cost of insurance, elect, phones ect. I drove from Portland Oregon 3 days in a row to meet the owner to pick up the keys, the last day I was there he didn't show up I called him no answer so I called from Melissa's phone what do you know he answered! He said he was out of the loop on it and handed the phone to his girlfriend, she said after they talked about it they changed their minds and we could not use the building. I can't say their names but I can tell you it was the empty office space by the 5 cent store where the subway is on the main street.
(snipped)

http://boards.insessiontrials.com/showthread.php?t=355444&page=30 (http://boards.insessiontrials.com/showthread.php?t=355444&page=30)
Thank-you for that  ::MonkeyCool::  I have a question, what happened over on insessions that Lindsey's thread is no longer? Was there some bad fighting or something? I went to look yesterday and it was there but said never to any posts  ::MonkeyConfused::
I see  what happened with Lindsey's thread on Insessions, they put it back on the amber alert and missing persons thread  ::MonkeyConfused::


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3 7/28/09 -
Post by: no rose colored glasses on August 14, 2009, 03:29:00 PM
Thank-you sherip, I just noticed that  ::MonkeyConfused::


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3 7/28/09 -
Post by: Edward on August 14, 2009, 03:40:55 PM
She is in New York with Amber's mom..
Mark K. has himself a following of missing children's moms to go around and talk ..
I do not know if they are paid or how expenses are covered but it all helps Mark K in the end.
mo.


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3 7/28/09 -
Post by: KarmaRoundUp on August 14, 2009, 03:50:48 PM
OnAMission also posted this at IS:

We may have a Church sorry I didn't say that. We will be up that way around the 26th of this month to hopefully get things moving. We are going to need volunteers lots of them. We depend on donations to help with the cost of running the center when we checked into donations for even water we were turned down by the store across the street where the building was going to be saying they could not afford it.
Oh the owner of the building changed his mind because his girlfriend didn't want to just donate a building.


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3 7/28/09 -
Post by: JessStar on August 14, 2009, 04:00:38 PM
OnAMission also posted this at IS:

We may have a Church sorry I didn't say that. We will be up that way around the 26th of this month to hopefully get things moving. We are going to need volunteers lots of them. We depend on donations to help with the cost of running the center when we checked into donations for even water we were turned down by the store across the street where the building was going to be saying they could not afford it.
Oh the owner of the building changed his mind because his girlfriend didn't want to just donate a building.

Who are the people that are going to be "running" this center?  Do we know anything about them?  Are they trustworthy?


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3 7/28/09 -
Post by: shortcake on August 14, 2009, 04:24:35 PM
OnAMission also posted this at IS:

We may have a Church sorry I didn't say that. We will be up that way around the 26th of this month to hopefully get things moving. We are going to need volunteers lots of them. We depend on donations to help with the cost of running the center when we checked into donations for even water we were turned down by the store across the street where the building was going to be saying they could not afford it.
Oh the owner of the building changed his mind because his girlfriend didn't want to just donate a building.

Who are the people that are going to be "running" this center?  Do we know anything about them?  Are they trustworthy?

There seems to be two buildings that would be ideal locations for a command center.  One is the VFW Hall at the downtown junction next to Beerbower Park.  The other is the McCleary Community Center located at 726 West Simpson Ave.  Both within a few blocks of the center of the town.  Why not one of these?  Does this town not care?  If you Google McCleary Community Center you will get pic's and all the information about renting the facility.  Why doesn't someone step up and donate one of these places for looking for this lost girl.  Something sure does not smell right.   


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3 7/28/09 -
Post by: KarmaRoundUp on August 14, 2009, 04:42:06 PM
OnAMission also posted this at IS:

We may have a Church sorry I didn't say that. We will be up that way around the 26th of this month to hopefully get things moving. We are going to need volunteers lots of them. We depend on donations to help with the cost of running the center when we checked into donations for even water we were turned down by the store across the street where the building was going to be saying they could not afford it.
Oh the owner of the building changed his mind because his girlfriend didn't want to just donate a building.

Who are the people that are going to be "running" this center?  Do we know anything about them?  Are they trustworthy?

From what I can tell it's the Laura Recovery Center and I know nothing about them.It seems to be some kinds foundation.

http://www.lrcf.org/


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3 7/28/09 -
Post by: Lovinlife on August 14, 2009, 04:51:46 PM
OnAMission also posted this at IS:

We may have a Church sorry I didn't say that. We will be up that way around the 26th of this month to hopefully get things moving. We are going to need volunteers lots of them. We depend on donations to help with the cost of running the center when we checked into donations for even water we were turned down by the store across the street where the building was going to be saying they could not afford it.
Oh the owner of the building changed his mind because his girlfriend didn't want to just donate a building.

Who are the people that are going to be "running" this center?  Do we know anything about them?  Are they trustworthy?

From what I can tell it's the Laura Recovery Center and I know nothing about them.It seems to be some kinds foundation.

http://www.lrcf.org/

Sorry to butt in...I believe that Laura Recovery Center is affiliated with KlaasKids Foundation.  They help organize community searches.  They have worked with Amber Dubois Family.  I believe that they are a nonprofit out of Texas IIRC.


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3 7/28/09 -
Post by: Gizzie on August 14, 2009, 04:52:49 PM
OnAMission also posted this at IS:

We may have a Church sorry I didn't say that. We will be up that way around the 26th of this month to hopefully get things moving. We are going to need volunteers lots of them. We depend on donations to help with the cost of running the center when we checked into donations for even water we were turned down by the store across the street where the building was going to be saying they could not afford it.
Oh the owner of the building changed his mind because his girlfriend didn't want to just donate a building
.

 ::MonkeyNoNo::  ::MonkeyNoNo::



Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3 7/28/09 -
Post by: KarmaRoundUp on August 14, 2009, 05:01:40 PM
OnAMission also posted this at IS:

We may have a Church sorry I didn't say that. We will be up that way around the 26th of this month to hopefully get things moving. We are going to need volunteers lots of them. We depend on donations to help with the cost of running the center when we checked into donations for even water we were turned down by the store across the street where the building was going to be saying they could not afford it.
Oh the owner of the building changed his mind because his girlfriend didn't want to just donate a building.

Who are the people that are going to be "running" this center?  Do we know anything about them?  Are they trustworthy?

From what I can tell it's the Laura Recovery Center and I know nothing about them.It seems to be some kinds foundation.

http://www.lrcf.org/

Sorry to butt in...I believe that Laura Recovery Center is affiliated with KlaasKids Foundation.  They help organize community searches.  They have worked with Amber Dubois Family.  I believe that they are a nonprofit out of Texas IIRC.
Thank you for the info Lovin
They are affiliated with KlaasKids and KK's seems pretty big to me.....they shouldn't now be having a hard time setting up some private searches and maybe a search center.....so I wonder why nothing seems to be urgent?


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3 7/28/09 -
Post by: KarmaRoundUp on August 14, 2009, 05:22:43 PM
I don't know if this video from 8/12/09 has been posted yet,it's about Melissa going to NY.


http://www.king5.com/video/featured-index.html?nvid=388641



Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3 7/28/09 -
Post by: JessStar on August 14, 2009, 06:05:03 PM
That's my thought too, Karma. I'd like to know for sure if they are involved, so if a local can confirm that, and perhaps post a contact name, that might be helpful. ;-)



Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3 7/28/09 -
Post by: no rose colored glasses on August 14, 2009, 06:55:23 PM
I don't know if this video from 8/12/09 has been posted yet,it's about Melissa going to NY.


http://www.king5.com/video/featured-index.html?nvid=388641


Thanks  ::MonkeyCool::


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3 7/28/09 -
Post by: KarmaRoundUp on August 14, 2009, 07:03:02 PM
That's my thought too, Karma. I'd like to know for sure if they are involved, so if a local can confirm that, and perhaps post a contact name, that might be helpful. ;-)


Kara and Melissa did have a blonde lady at the last vigil,said she was from the Laura Recovery Center but I didn't catch her name.Yes,maybe a local knows her name?


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3 7/28/09 -
Post by: KarmaRoundUp on August 14, 2009, 07:04:37 PM
I don't know if this video from 8/12/09 has been posted yet,it's about Melissa going to NY.


http://www.king5.com/video/featured-index.html?nvid=388641


Thanks  ::MonkeyCool::
You're welcome NoRose
Can you tell I am desperate for news?
:::::sighs:::::
Have a good night you all.

Praying for Lindsey
 ::MonkeyAngel::


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3 7/28/09 -
Post by: AZSunny on August 14, 2009, 08:55:26 PM
I think we are all craving some information.  I am so sad that we lost our researchers.  Hopefully they will come back to post some updates. 


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3 7/28/09 -
Post by: no rose colored glasses on August 14, 2009, 08:55:56 PM
I don't know if this video from 8/12/09 has been posted yet,it's about Melissa going to NY.


http://www.king5.com/video/featured-index.html?nvid=388641


Thanks  ::MonkeyCool::
You're welcome NoRose
Can you tell I am desperate for news?
:::::sighs:::::
Have a good night you all.

Praying for Lindsey
 ::MonkeyAngel::
Have a good night, I'm desperate for news also.  ::MonkeyNoNo::


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3 7/28/09 -
Post by: no rose colored glasses on August 14, 2009, 08:56:17 PM
I think we are all craving some information.  I am so sad that we lost our researchers.  Hopefully they will come back to post some updates. 
I do too.


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3 7/28/09 -
Post by: klaasend on August 14, 2009, 08:59:25 PM
(http://i118.photobucket.com/albums/o100/klaasen3/Sub7/pretzer081409.jpg)

Show starts in about 2 minutes.  Click on the link below:

http://scaredmonkeysradio.com/radio.m3u


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3 7/28/09 -
Post by: Sister on August 14, 2009, 10:30:28 PM
FYI - the relative of the other girl who said she also thought something bad was going to happen, is a friend of someone in marilyn's immediate family. These kids are all tied together.



Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3 7/28/09 -
Post by: Deenie on August 14, 2009, 11:55:00 PM
 ::MonkeyAngel::

Sorry I feel as I am a Monkey Missing In " Lindsey Action" I have not been within Lindsey's cage for a while now. I do check daily the news if any thing is reported on her.
I do as if I were checking my own mail - I saw on the news that Mom is going to New York.

I read on one news site many " indifferent responses" of Melissa going to New York.
I am no judge nor jury of anyone..
My Prayers are for Lindsey to be Found

 ::MonkeySkate::   ( I think Lindsey would like the Skate Monkey) 

 :smt049


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3 7/28/09 -
Post by: mamacrazy30 on August 15, 2009, 12:10:22 AM
FYI - the relative of the other girl who said she also thought something bad was going to happen, is a friend of someone in marilyn's immediate family. These kids are all tied together.


such as what???  you know where i stand and i want to here more ::MonkeyAngel::


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3 7/28/09 -
Post by: Sister on August 15, 2009, 12:22:07 AM
FYI - the relative of the other girl who said she also thought something bad was going to happen, is a friend of someone in marilyn's immediate family. These kids are all tied together.

such as what???  you know where i stand and i want to here more ::MonkeyAngel::

Mama, that's the big question. What did these girls think was the "bad" thing about to happen.  It was on both their myspace pages.  I really don't know.


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3 7/28/09 -
Post by: KarmaRoundUp on August 15, 2009, 08:04:52 AM
Good too early in the morning Monkeys

I borrowed this article,written by the same forum/blog that KaraK writes for.(We are credited on the last page)

http://www.associatedcontent.com/article/1948216/lindsey_baum_and_the_intersection_of.html?cat=2


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3 7/28/09 -
Post by: KarmaRoundUp on August 15, 2009, 08:06:04 AM
FYI - the relative of the other girl who said she also thought something bad was going to happen, is a friend of someone in marilyn's immediate family. These kids are all tied together.

such as what???  you know where i stand and i want to here more ::MonkeyAngel::

Mama, that's the big question. What did these girls think was the "bad" thing about to happen.  It was on both their myspace pages.  I really don't know.
Sister,who is the other kid who also thought something bad is going to happen?If you don't mind me asking.


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3 7/28/09 -
Post by: KarmaRoundUp on August 15, 2009, 08:10:21 AM
A woman who says she works for the Laura Recovery Center(I have no way of proving she works for them)has a MySpace page up about missing kids and she is featuring Lindsey.


http://www.myspace.com/missingchildren7304



Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3 7/28/09 -
Post by: no rose colored glasses on August 15, 2009, 09:46:57 AM
FYI - the relative of the other girl who said she also thought something bad was going to happen, is a friend of someone in marilyn's immediate family. These kids are all tied together.

such as what???  you know where i stand and i want to here more ::MonkeyAngel::

Mama, that's the big question. What did these girls think was the "bad" thing about to happen.  It was on both their myspace pages.  I really don't know.
Sister,who is the other kid who also thought something bad is going to happen?If you don't mind me asking.
  ::MonkeyEek::  This is very interesting, how very strange, why were these young girls thinking this way?


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3 7/28/09 -
Post by: Sister on August 15, 2009, 11:00:40 AM
FYI - the relative of the other girl who said she also thought something bad was going to happen, is a friend of someone in marilyn's immediate family. These kids are all tied together.

such as what???  you know where i stand and i want to here more ::MonkeyAngel::

Mama, that's the big question. What did these girls think was the "bad" thing about to happen.  It was on both their myspace pages.  I really don't know.
Sister,who is the other kid who also thought something bad is going to happen?If you don't mind me asking.
  ::MonkeyEek::  This is very interesting, how very strange, why were these young girls thinking this way?

NoRose, I have no idea.  KaraR, Lindsey joins Myspace on a new myspace account Twilight Freak and posts at 4:04am in the morning on May 29 that she is happy. By 5:48 in the morning on May 29th her mood is scared and she says she is having nightmares and feels something bad is going to happen.  Additionally, one of her friends on her account is saying something similar.


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3 7/28/09 -
Post by: no rose colored glasses on August 15, 2009, 11:10:30 AM
Thanks, very odd and puzzling  ::MonkeyConfused::


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3 7/28/09 -
Post by: AZSunny on August 15, 2009, 11:14:01 AM
Good too early in the morning Monkeys

I borrowed this article,written by the same forum/blog that KaraK writes for.(We are credited on the last page)

http://www.associatedcontent.com/article/1948216/lindsey_baum_and_the_intersection_of.html?cat=2


Excellent article, very well written. 


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3 7/28/09 -
Post by: A_News_Junkie_Monkey on August 15, 2009, 11:18:09 AM
   Lindsey baby girl, WHERE ARE YOU? 


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3 7/28/09 -
Post by: AZSunny on August 15, 2009, 11:21:55 AM
I am amazed they keep saying 4 short blocks.  When I look at the photos, it seems more like 8 blocks to me.  It appears to be quite a distance.  1/2 mile or more. Is there a pictue of the block and houses where she was last seen? (or presumably last seen)


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3 7/28/09 -
Post by: AZSunny on August 15, 2009, 11:22:49 AM
A woman who says she works for the Laura Recovery Center(I have no way of proving she works for them)has a MySpace page up about missing kids and she is featuring Lindsey.


http://www.myspace.com/missingchildren7304



What a beautiful child.  This is so sad.


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3 7/28/09 -
Post by: no rose colored glasses on August 15, 2009, 12:00:04 PM
I am amazed they keep saying 4 short blocks.  When I look at the photos, it seems more like 8 blocks to me.  It appears to be quite a distance.  1/2 mile or more. Is there a pictue of the block and houses where she was last seen? (or presumably last seen)
It doesn't seem like a short walk to me either.


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3 7/28/09 -
Post by: Sister on August 15, 2009, 01:04:32 PM
Good too early in the morning Monkeys

I borrowed this article,written by the same forum/blog that KaraK writes for.(We are credited on the last page)

http://www.associatedcontent.com/article/1948216/lindsey_baum_and_the_intersection_of.html?cat=2


Thank you for posting this -- there is no doubt a chill effect, but from whence it comes ---


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3 7/28/09 -
Post by: Heidismom on August 15, 2009, 02:06:52 PM
I am amazed they keep saying 4 short blocks.  When I look at the photos, it seems more like 8 blocks to me.  It appears to be quite a distance.  1/2 mile or more. Is there a pictue of the block and houses where she was last seen? (or presumably last seen)
It doesn't seem like a short walk to me either.



I agree on the distance, the first news reports all said 4 blocks, but if Kara lives at the house where they have the picture of her & Kayla, it is quite a bit further than that.The house they are standing in front of in the picture  is the second house from the sewer treatment plant.
I identified a house several days ago on here as being across the street from Kara, from counting the four blocks, but that is not right if she lives clear at the end of Maple.


Do I make any sense?
Kara, where do you live?/ lol


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3 7/28/09 -
Post by: AZSunny on August 15, 2009, 02:09:57 PM
I am amazed they keep saying 4 short blocks.  When I look at the photos, it seems more like 8 blocks to me.  It appears to be quite a distance.  1/2 mile or more. Is there a pictue of the block and houses where she was last seen? (or presumably last seen)
It doesn't seem like a short walk to me either.



I agree on the distance, the first news reports all said 4 blocks, but if Kara lives at the house where they have the picture of her & Kayla, it is quite a bit further than that.The house they are standing in front of in the picture  is the second house from the sewer treatment plant.
I identified a house several days ago on here as being across the street from Kara, from counting the four blocks, but that is not right if she lives clear at the end of Maple.


Do I make any sense?
Kara, where do you live?/ lol

Hi Heidi,  I am in Arizona, but I have family in Washington.   Yes, I understand what you are saying, I think! LOL


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3 7/28/09 -
Post by: AZSunny on August 15, 2009, 02:28:15 PM
I am amazed they keep saying 4 short blocks.  When I look at the photos, it seems more like 8 blocks to me.  It appears to be quite a distance.  1/2 mile or more. Is there a pictue of the block and houses where she was last seen? (or presumably last seen)
It doesn't seem like a short walk to me either.



I agree on the distance, the first news reports all said 4 blocks, but if Kara lives at the house where they have the picture of her & Kayla, it is quite a bit further than that.The house they are standing in front of in the picture  is the second house from the sewer treatment plant.
I identified a house several days ago on here as being across the street from Kara, from counting the four blocks, but that is not right if she lives clear at the end of Maple.


Do I make any sense?
Kara, where do you live?/ lol

Hi Heidi,  I am in Arizona, but I have family in Washington.   Yes, I understand what you are saying, I think! LOL

Whoops,  just realized you were talking to Karma, not me. 


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3 7/28/09 -
Post by: NCSunny on August 15, 2009, 02:55:11 PM
FYI - the relative of the other girl who said she also thought something bad was going to happen, is a friend of someone in marilyn's immediate family. These kids are all tied together.

such as what???  you know where i stand and i want to here more ::MonkeyAngel::

Mama, that's the big question. What did these girls think was the "bad" thing about to happen.  It was on both their myspace pages.  I really don't know.
Sister,who is the other kid who also thought something bad is going to happen?If you don't mind me asking.

I'm not Sister, but I recall a friend of either LB or MK writing on her MySpace page almost exactly what LB had written about thinking or feeling something 'bad' was going to happen.

She was the one who took all the pics of herself sticking out her chest & most of the pics were taken in the bathroom. (If you saw them, this may help you remember her.)

Sorry, I don't recall her name, and now that all the MySpace pages have gone private, I doubt we can find her.


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3 7/28/09 -
Post by: KarmaRoundUp on August 15, 2009, 03:21:22 PM
FYI - the relative of the other girl who said she also thought something bad was going to happen, is a friend of someone in marilyn's immediate family. These kids are all tied together.

such as what???  you know where i stand and i want to here more ::MonkeyAngel::

Mama, that's the big question. What did these girls think was the "bad" thing about to happen.  It was on both their myspace pages.  I really don't know.
Sister,who is the other kid who also thought something bad is going to happen?If you don't mind me asking.

I'm not Sister, but I recall a friend of either LB or MK writing on her MySpace page almost exactly what LB had written about thinking or feeling something 'bad' was going to happen.

She was the one who took all the pics of herself sticking out her chest & most of the pics were taken in the bathroom. (If you saw them, this may help you remember her.)

Sorry, I don't recall her name, and now that all the MySpace pages have gone private, I doubt we can find her.
Thanks NCSunny
I do remember that girl's MS....vaguely.


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3 7/28/09 -
Post by: KarmaRoundUp on August 15, 2009, 03:22:42 PM
Good too early in the morning Monkeys

I borrowed this article,written by the same forum/blog that KaraK writes for.(We are credited on the last page)

http://www.associatedcontent.com/article/1948216/lindsey_baum_and_the_intersection_of.html?cat=2


Thank you for posting this -- there is no doubt a chill effect, but from whence it comes ---
Sister,I'm tired and not understanding what you mean?


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3 7/28/09 -
Post by: KarmaRoundUp on August 15, 2009, 03:28:50 PM
I am amazed they keep saying 4 short blocks.  When I look at the photos, it seems more like 8 blocks to me.  It appears to be quite a distance.  1/2 mile or more. Is there a pictue of the block and houses where she was last seen? (or presumably last seen)
AZSunny,yes,it was longer than 4 blocks going by the map below.Looks like almost 6 blocks from where she was last seen.KaraK lives between 6th and 7th streets.




Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3 7/28/09 -
Post by: Sister on August 15, 2009, 05:25:28 PM
Good too early in the morning Monkeys

I borrowed this article,written by the same forum/blog that KaraK writes for.(We are credited on the last page)

http://www.associatedcontent.com/article/1948216/lindsey_baum_and_the_intersection_of.html?cat=2


Thank you for posting this -- there is no doubt a chill effect, but from whence it comes ---
Sister,I'm tired and not understanding what you mean?

from the article you posted:
". . . Thinking back on my own preteen experience with a predator who stalked me and my friend Annemarie when we were just a little older than Lindsey Baum, I fear the effect the negative speculation might have on Lindsey Baum's friends' willingness to break the informal code that causes kids to keep secrets from adults . . . can't help but wonder if the thoughtless negative commentary being publicly tossed around might chill the helpful instincts of Lindsey's friends and others who might have a shred of information that could help uncover what happened to Lindsey Baum."

sorry, I wasn't clearer.  Powerful article!



Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3 7/28/09 -
Post by: Sister on August 15, 2009, 05:28:10 PM
FYI - the relative of the other girl who said she also thought something bad was going to happen, is a friend of someone in marilyn's immediate family. These kids are all tied together.

such as what???  you know where i stand and i want to here more ::MonkeyAngel::

Mama, that's the big question. What did these girls think was the "bad" thing about to happen.  It was on both their myspace pages.  I really don't know.
Sister,who is the other kid who also thought something bad is going to happen?If you don't mind me asking.

I'm not Sister, but I recall a friend of either LB or MK writing on her MySpace page almost exactly what LB had written about thinking or feeling something 'bad' was going to happen.

She was the one who took all the pics of herself sticking out her chest & most of the pics were taken in the bathroom. (If you saw them, this may help you remember her.)

Sorry, I don't recall her name, and now that all the MySpace pages have gone private, I doubt we can find her.

Just my hope, if you do figure out her name, she is just a child, please don't post it.  That's just me.


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3 7/28/09 -
Post by: KarmaRoundUp on August 15, 2009, 07:16:35 PM
Good too early in the morning Monkeys

I borrowed this article,written by the same forum/blog that KaraK writes for.(We are credited on the last page)

http://www.associatedcontent.com/article/1948216/lindsey_baum_and_the_intersection_of.html?cat=2


Thank you for posting this -- there is no doubt a chill effect, but from whence it comes ---
Sister,I'm tired and not understanding what you mean?

from the article you posted:
". . . Thinking back on my own preteen experience with a predator who stalked me and my friend Annemarie when we were just a little older than Lindsey Baum, I fear the effect the negative speculation might have on Lindsey Baum's friends' willingness to break the informal code that causes kids to keep secrets from adults . . . can't help but wonder if the thoughtless negative commentary being publicly tossed around might chill the helpful instincts of Lindsey's friends and others who might have a shred of information that could help uncover what happened to Lindsey Baum."

sorry, I wasn't clearer.  Powerful article!


Ahh,I get it now,thanks Sister.I hope it's not keeping any of the kids quiet about anything that may have happened.......


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3 7/28/09 -
Post by: Sister on August 15, 2009, 07:41:09 PM
KarmaR, I think it can/does have the effect.  The article you posted is so direct in that regard and kids now days read more on the net than from a book.  I'm just concerned the kids won't speak up about anything, no matter how insignificant it may seem.


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3 7/28/09 -
Post by: KarmaRoundUp on August 15, 2009, 07:59:46 PM
I was over in the first Lindsey thread re reading some stuff and I ran across this list that DD put together.The people who live on Maple ST.,Lindsey's route home.These people all live at the BeeHive retirement apartments at 401 Maple.I am still thinking that a relative(who is a predator)was visiting someone at the apartments and ran into Lindsey.BeeHive would be between 4th and 5th streets on Maple.
Interesting that there is a couple with last name of Campbell(last name of SS)  living there.I wonder if DD ever investigated the relationship between them to see if they are related?


Quote
DD posted:

•Beehive Assisted Living Community
401 W Maple St
McCleary, WA 98557-9638
(xxx) xxx-xxxx Edit -No phone numbers please
Company: Beehive Assisted Living Community



 •Art Bergman
401 W Maple St, Apt 32
McCleary, WA 98557-9639
(xxx) xxx-xxxx Edit-No phone numbers please



 •Edna Birindelli
401 W Maple St
McCleary, WA 98557-9638
(xxx) xxx-xxxxEdit-No phone numbers please


 •Arlin Burbidge
401 W Maple St
McCleary, WA 98557-9638
(xxx) xxx-xxxx Edit-No phone numbers please
Household: Norma Burbidge


 •Norma Burbidge
401 W Maple St
McCleary, WA 98557-9638
(xxx) xxx-xxxx Edit-No phone numbers please
Household: Arlin Burbidge



 •Oscar K Burkard
401 W Maple St, Apt 63
McCleary, WA 98557-9640
(xxx) xxx-xxxxEdit-No phone numbers please


 •Alberta D Campbell
401 W Maple St, Apt 128
McCleary, WA 98557-9642
Household: Thomas Campbell

 •Thomas Campbell
401 W Maple St, Apt 128
McCleary, WA 98557-9642
Household: Alberta D Campbell


 •Carl Challstedt
401 W Maple St
McCleary, WA 98557-9638
(xxx) xxx-xxxxEdit-No phone numbers please


Phyllis Derline
401 W Maple St, Apt 68
McCleary, WA 98557-9640
(xxx) xxx-xxxx Edit-No phone numbers please


 •R Hamshar
401 W Maple St, Apt V3A
McCleary, WA 98557-9640
(xxx) xxx-xxxx Edit-No phone numbers please


 •Leslie Hyman
401 W Maple St
McCleary, WA 98557-9638
(xxx) xxx-xxxx Edit-No phone numbers please
Household: Ruby E Hyman


 •Ruby E Hyman
401 W Maple St
McCleary, WA 98557-9638
(xxx) xxx-xxxx Edit- No phone numbers please
Household: Leslie Hyman

 •Evelyn Juroshek
401 W Maple St
McCleary, WA 98557-9638
(xxx) xxx-xxxx Edit - No phone numbers please


 •N E Lattin
401 W Maple St, Apt 115
McCleary, WA 98557-9641
(xxx) xxx-xxxx Edit - No phone numbers please


 •Frances Louthen
401 W Maple St
McCleary, WA 98557-9638
(xxx) xxx-xxxx Edit- No phone numbers please


 •Cassy Mikulski
401 W Maple St
McCleary, WA 98557-9638
(xxx) xxx-xxxx Edit- No phone numbers please
Household: M Mikulski


 •M Mikulski
401 W Maple St
McCleary, WA 98557-9638
(xxx) xxx-xxxx Edit- No phone numbers please
Household: Cassy Mikulski

 •Tracie Peterson
401 W Maple St, Apt 69
McCleary, WA 98557-9640
(xxx) xxx-xxxx Edit-No phone numbers please


Webb B Peterson
401 W Maple St, Apt 69
McCleary, WA 98557-9640
(xxx) xxx-xxxx  Edit-No phone numbers please
Household: Tracie Peterson


 •Mildred Scheelke
401 W Maple St
McCleary, WA 98557-9638
(xxx) xxx-xxxx Edit-No phone numbers please
Household: Jim H Scheelke


 •Marion Smith
401 W Maple St
McCleary, WA 98557-9638
(xxx) xxx-xxxx Edit-No phone number please
Household: Susan Smith


 •Susan Smith
401 W Maple St
McCleary, WA 98557-9638
(xxx) xxx-xxxx Edit- No phone numbers please
Household: Marion Smith


 •Maxine Snyder
401 W Maple St
McCleary, WA 98557-9638
(xxx) xxx-xxxx Edit-No phone numbers please
Household: Richard Snyder


 •Richard Snyder
401 W Maple St
McCleary, WA 98557-9638
(xxx) xxx-xxxx Edit-No phone numbers please
Household: Maxine Snyder


 •Jim H Stevens
401 W Maple St
McCleary, WA 98557-9638

Household: Mildred Stevens


 •Francis Watters
401 W Maple St
McCleary, WA 98557-9638

Household: Larry Watters


 •Larry Watters
401 W Maple St
McCleary, WA 98557-9638

Household: Francis Watters


 •John F Wuthrich
401 W Maple St, Apt 67
McCleary, WA 98557-9640




Lois Wuthrich
401 W Maple St, Apt 67
McCleary, WA 98557-9640

Household: John F Wuthrich


 •Twyla H Bogar
401 W Maple St
McCleary, WA 98557-9638


 •Jane Brisco
401 W Maple St
McCleary, WA 98557-9638



 •D C Butterfield
401 W Maple St
McCleary, WA 98557-9638



 •Dale D Dorning
401 W Maple St
McCleary, WA 98557-9638




 •Helen M Fagan
401 W Maple St, Apt 62
McCleary, WA 98557-9640



 •Steve Fahrenwald
401 W Maple St
McCleary, WA 98557-9638




 •Marjorie Farrar
401 W Maple St, Apt 65
McCleary, WA 98557-9640


Diana Foster
401 W Maple St
McCleary, WA 98557-9638
Job title: Branch Manager
Company: Beehive Management Group


 •Shirley C Graves
401 W Maple St, Apt 133
McCleary, WA 98557-9642


Vivian Gross
401 W Maple St
McCleary, WA 98557-9638

Household: Carol Murphy



 •Nellie Harrison
401 W Maple St
McCleary, WA 98557-9638



 •Doris Hoffelt
401 W Maple St, Apt 126
McCleary, WA 98557-9642



 •Bill Hoffman
401 W Maple St, Apt 66
McCleary, WA 98557-9640



 •Richard Isaacson
401 W Maple St
McCleary, WA 98557-9638



 •Zepha Jenks
401 W Maple St, Apt 108
McCleary, WA 98557-9641


 •Marie King
401 W Maple St
McCleary, WA 98557-9638



 •Walter Kratcha
401 W Maple St
McCleary, WA 98557-9638



 •Kenneth J Lindstrom
401 W Maple St, Apt 122
McCleary, WA 98557-9641


 •T Lines
401 W Maple St
McCleary, WA 98557-9638



Barbara J Mcbride
401 W Maple St, Apt 132
McCleary, WA 98557-9642




 •Carol Murphy
401 W Maple St
McCleary, WA 98557-9638

Household: Vivian Gross
 


 •Patricia N Nelson
401 W Maple St, Apt 73
McCleary, WA 98557-9640
 


 •Margaret Rygh
401 W Maple St, Apt 61
McCleary, WA 98557-9640


 •Dora Seaman
401 W Maple St
McCleary, WA 98557-9638

 


 •Jack D Sharp
401 W Maple St
McCleary, WA 98557-9638



 •Janet Simms
401 W Maple St
McCleary, WA 98557-9638



Danny Tate
401 W Maple St
McCleary, WA 98557-9638
Household: Jack Tate, Waneeta Tate, Lyle J Tate

Jack Tate
401 W Maple St
McCleary, WA 98557-9638
Household: Danny Tate, Waneeta Tate, Lyle J Tate


Lyle J Tate
401 W Maple St
McCleary, WA 98557-9638
Household: Jack Tate, Danny Tate, Waneeta Tate


Waneeta Tate
401 W Maple St
McCleary, WA 98557-9638
Household: Jack Tate, Danny Tate, Lyle J Tate


W Toyra
401 W Maple St
McCleary, WA 98557-9638


 •Gordon Whitcomb
401 W Maple St, Apt 61
McCleary, WA 98557-9640



 •Ginger Williamson
401 W Maple St
McCleary, WA 98557-9638



 •Constance Woolsey
401 W Maple St
McCleary, WA 98557-9638

 



Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3 7/28/09 -
Post by: KarmaRoundUp on August 15, 2009, 08:03:27 PM
KarmaR, I think it can/does have the effect.  The article you posted is so direct in that regard and kids now days read more on the net than from a book.  I'm just concerned the kids won't speak up about anything, no matter how insignificant it may seem.
That's a dang shame,I would hope her closest friends would speak up.They may not feel comfortable talking to LE but surely they would talk to Melissa.


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3 7/28/09 -
Post by: Heidismom on August 15, 2009, 08:45:14 PM
I was over in the first Lindsey thread re reading some stuff and I ran across this list that DD put together.The people who live on Maple ST.,Lindsey's route home.These people all live at the BeeHive retirement apartments at 401 Maple.I am still thinking that a relative(who is a predator)was visiting someone at the apartments and ran into Lindsey.BeeHive would be between 4th and 5th streets on Maple.
Interesting that there is a couple with last name of Campbell(last name of SS)  living there.I wonder if DD ever investigated the relationship between them to see if they are related?


Quote
DD posted:

•Beehive Assisted Living Community
401 W Maple St
McCleary, WA 98557-9638
(xxx) xxx-xxxx Edit -No phone numbers please
Company: Beehive Assisted Living Community



 •Art Bergman
401 W Maple St, Apt 32
McCleary, WA 98557-9639
(xxx) xxx-xxxx Edit-No phone numbers please



 •Edna Birindelli
401 W Maple St
McCleary, WA 98557-9638
(xxx) xxx-xxxxEdit-No phone numbers please


 •Arlin Burbidge
401 W Maple St
McCleary, WA 98557-9638
(xxx) xxx-xxxx Edit-No phone numbers please
Household: Norma Burbidge


 •Norma Burbidge
401 W Maple St
McCleary, WA 98557-9638
(xxx) xxx-xxxx Edit-No phone numbers please
Household: Arlin Burbidge



 •Oscar K Burkard
401 W Maple St, Apt 63
McCleary, WA 98557-9640
(xxx) xxx-xxxxEdit-No phone numbers please


 •Alberta D Campbell
401 W Maple St, Apt 128
McCleary, WA 98557-9642
Household: Thomas Campbell

 •Thomas Campbell
401 W Maple St, Apt 128
McCleary, WA 98557-9642
Household: Alberta D Campbell


 •Carl Challstedt
401 W Maple St
McCleary, WA 98557-9638
(xxx) xxx-xxxxEdit-No phone numbers please


Phyllis Derline
401 W Maple St, Apt 68
McCleary, WA 98557-9640
(xxx) xxx-xxxx Edit-No phone numbers please


 •R Hamshar
401 W Maple St, Apt V3A
McCleary, WA 98557-9640
(xxx) xxx-xxxx Edit-No phone numbers please


 •Leslie Hyman
401 W Maple St
McCleary, WA 98557-9638
(xxx) xxx-xxxx Edit-No phone numbers please
Household: Ruby E Hyman


 •Ruby E Hyman
401 W Maple St
McCleary, WA 98557-9638
(xxx) xxx-xxxx Edit- No phone numbers please
Household: Leslie Hyman

 •Evelyn Juroshek
401 W Maple St
McCleary, WA 98557-9638
(xxx) xxx-xxxx Edit - No phone numbers please


 •N E Lattin
401 W Maple St, Apt 115
McCleary, WA 98557-9641
(xxx) xxx-xxxx Edit - No phone numbers please


 •Frances Louthen
401 W Maple St
McCleary, WA 98557-9638
(xxx) xxx-xxxx Edit- No phone numbers please


 •Cassy Mikulski
401 W Maple St
McCleary, WA 98557-9638
(xxx) xxx-xxxx Edit- No phone numbers please
Household: M Mikulski


 •M Mikulski
401 W Maple St
McCleary, WA 98557-9638
(xxx) xxx-xxxx Edit- No phone numbers please
Household: Cassy Mikulski

 •Tracie Peterson
401 W Maple St, Apt 69
McCleary, WA 98557-9640
(xxx) xxx-xxxx Edit-No phone numbers please


Webb B Peterson
401 W Maple St, Apt 69
McCleary, WA 98557-9640
(xxx) xxx-xxxx  Edit-No phone numbers please
Household: Tracie Peterson


 •Mildred Scheelke
401 W Maple St
McCleary, WA 98557-9638
(xxx) xxx-xxxx Edit-No phone numbers please
Household: Jim H Scheelke


 •Marion Smith
401 W Maple St
McCleary, WA 98557-9638
(xxx) xxx-xxxx Edit-No phone number please
Household: Susan Smith


 •Susan Smith
401 W Maple St
McCleary, WA 98557-9638
(xxx) xxx-xxxx Edit- No phone numbers please
Household: Marion Smith


 •Maxine Snyder
401 W Maple St
McCleary, WA 98557-9638
(xxx) xxx-xxxx Edit-No phone numbers please
Household: Richard Snyder


 •Richard Snyder
401 W Maple St
McCleary, WA 98557-9638
(xxx) xxx-xxxx Edit-No phone numbers please
Household: Maxine Snyder


 •Jim H Stevens
401 W Maple St
McCleary, WA 98557-9638

Household: Mildred Stevens


 •Francis Watters
401 W Maple St
McCleary, WA 98557-9638

Household: Larry Watters


 •Larry Watters
401 W Maple St
McCleary, WA 98557-9638

Household: Francis Watters


 •John F Wuthrich
401 W Maple St, Apt 67
McCleary, WA 98557-9640




Lois Wuthrich
401 W Maple St, Apt 67
McCleary, WA 98557-9640

Household: John F Wuthrich


 •Twyla H Bogar
401 W Maple St
McCleary, WA 98557-9638


 •Jane Brisco
401 W Maple St
McCleary, WA 98557-9638



 •D C Butterfield
401 W Maple St
McCleary, WA 98557-9638



 •Dale D Dorning
401 W Maple St
McCleary, WA 98557-9638




 •Helen M Fagan
401 W Maple St, Apt 62
McCleary, WA 98557-9640



 •Steve Fahrenwald
401 W Maple St
McCleary, WA 98557-9638




 •Marjorie Farrar
401 W Maple St, Apt 65
McCleary, WA 98557-9640


Diana Foster
401 W Maple St
McCleary, WA 98557-9638
Job title: Branch Manager
Company: Beehive Management Group


 •Shirley C Graves
401 W Maple St, Apt 133
McCleary, WA 98557-9642


Vivian Gross
401 W Maple St
McCleary, WA 98557-9638

Household: Carol Murphy



 •Nellie Harrison
401 W Maple St
McCleary, WA 98557-9638



 •Doris Hoffelt
401 W Maple St, Apt 126
McCleary, WA 98557-9642



 •Bill Hoffman
401 W Maple St, Apt 66
McCleary, WA 98557-9640



 •Richard Isaacson
401 W Maple St
McCleary, WA 98557-9638



 •Zepha Jenks
401 W Maple St, Apt 108
McCleary, WA 98557-9641


 •Marie King
401 W Maple St
McCleary, WA 98557-9638



 •Walter Kratcha
401 W Maple St
McCleary, WA 98557-9638



 •Kenneth J Lindstrom
401 W Maple St, Apt 122
McCleary, WA 98557-9641


 •T Lines
401 W Maple St
McCleary, WA 98557-9638



Barbara J Mcbride
401 W Maple St, Apt 132
McCleary, WA 98557-9642




 •Carol Murphy
401 W Maple St
McCleary, WA 98557-9638

Household: Vivian Gross
 


 •Patricia N Nelson
401 W Maple St, Apt 73
McCleary, WA 98557-9640
 


 •Margaret Rygh
401 W Maple St, Apt 61
McCleary, WA 98557-9640


 •Dora Seaman
401 W Maple St
McCleary, WA 98557-9638

 


 •Jack D Sharp
401 W Maple St
McCleary, WA 98557-9638



 •Janet Simms
401 W Maple St
McCleary, WA 98557-9638



Danny Tate
401 W Maple St
McCleary, WA 98557-9638
Household: Jack Tate, Waneeta Tate, Lyle J Tate

Jack Tate
401 W Maple St
McCleary, WA 98557-9638
Household: Danny Tate, Waneeta Tate, Lyle J Tate


Lyle J Tate
401 W Maple St
McCleary, WA 98557-9638
Household: Jack Tate, Danny Tate, Waneeta Tate


Waneeta Tate
401 W Maple St
McCleary, WA 98557-9638
Household: Jack Tate, Danny Tate, Lyle J Tate


W Toyra
401 W Maple St
McCleary, WA 98557-9638


 •Gordon Whitcomb
401 W Maple St, Apt 61
McCleary, WA 98557-9640



 •Ginger Williamson
401 W Maple St
McCleary, WA 98557-9638



 •Constance Woolsey
401 W Maple St
McCleary, WA 98557-9638

 

  The Beehive is between 6th & 7th  Doubt that info is important tho.  Your theory is a distinct possibility, I used to work there, & some family members that visited were quite "interesting"


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3 7/28/09 -
Post by: Sister on August 15, 2009, 09:01:56 PM
KarmaR, I think it can/does have the effect.  The article you posted is so direct in that regard and kids now days read more on the net than from a book.  I'm just concerned the kids won't speak up about anything, no matter how insignificant it may seem.
That's a dang shame,I would hope her closest friends would speak up.They may not feel comfortable talking to LE but surely they would talk to Melissa.

KarmaR, I hear what you're saying, but even in the article you posted, the girls hadn't even told their parents and there were no other kids involved.  Unfortunately, kids don't often "rat" on other kids and they assuredly will not "rat" on their friends' family members, even when their personal friends are involved.  I guess that's why pure speculation bothers me in cases where there is still the possibility of a child being found alive.  If the kids talked to Melissa, they know she would go to LE so there is no way they would do that.  It's sad, the chilling effect is real.


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3 7/28/09 -
Post by: Sister on August 15, 2009, 09:22:18 PM
I was over in the first Lindsey thread re reading some stuff and I ran across this list that DD put together.The people who live on Maple ST.,Lindsey's route home.These people all live at the BeeHive retirement apartments at 401 Maple.I am still thinking that a relative(who is a predator)was visiting someone at the apartments and ran into Lindsey.BeeHive would be between 4th and 5th streets on Maple.
Interesting that there is a couple with last name of Campbell(last name of SS)  living there.I wonder if DD ever investigated the relationship between them to see if they are related?


ote]DD posted:

•Beehive Assisted Living Community
401 W Maple St
McCleary, WA 98557-9638
(xxx) xxx-xxxx Edit -No phone numbers please
Company: Beehive Assisted Living Community
  The Beehive is between 6th & 7th  Doubt that info is important tho.  Your theory is a distinct possibility, I used to work there, & some family members that visited were quite "interesting"
[/quote]

I believe they were looked at for a connection -- but the theory is something to consider, yet would be difficult at best try and research.


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3 7/28/09 -
Post by: NCSunny on August 15, 2009, 09:22:33 PM
Just my hope, if you do figure out her name, she is just a child, please don't post it.  That's just me.

Oh, I wouldn't, I would post only the link to the MySpace page.  ::MonkeyWink::


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3 7/28/09 -
Post by: Sister on August 15, 2009, 09:23:44 PM
sorry, messed up the quotes.
tired.
 :smt015


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3 7/28/09 -
Post by: shortcake on August 16, 2009, 07:15:35 AM
An older guy matching the age of Richard Allen Phernetton that was arrested 7/20 in Montesanto was let go by the Strattleline ORV Park around the time of the search.  I don't know if it is the same person, but there can't be too many let go around that time.  I also heard he had his computer and car confiscated.  I hope someone digs a little more into this.  Also, where is karak?  She has over 125 posts from 6/28 to 7/17 and only 2 since.  She had a lot of information and may even know something about this Allen guy.  Now she seems to be very silent.  Does she know something she does not want to share?


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3 7/28/09 -
Post by: Sister on August 16, 2009, 07:41:28 AM
Good morning, I have been told that KaraK has been asked not participate in the speculative blogs as many rumors get started this way (check out some of the articles on Christine Sheddy on another thread and you'll see what they are talking about, I think).  It can cause hindrance in the investigation.  But, I don't want to speak for her, as it is my understanding it was a request and not a "don't."
Have a blessed Sunday everyone.


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3 7/28/09 -
Post by: KarmaRoundUp on August 16, 2009, 10:06:45 AM
Good morning Monkeys

JVK from WS posted more McCleary images.


Quote
JVK wrote:
I was in/out of McCleary today.

Took *some* pictures in/out of town, some while driving.

Primarily I ventured east & north/east of this point here w/a GPS on foot through 'forest areas.

http://tinyurl.com/pok2za
Map of the bolded above:

Quote
http://maps.google.com/maps?f=q&source=s_q&hl=en&geocode=&q=county+line+rd+mccleary+wa&sll=47.073395,-123.257203&sspn=0.007088,0.013797&ie=UTF8&ll=47.083566,-123.260293&spn=0.007086,0.013797&t=h&z=16&iwloc=A



Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3 7/28/09 -
Post by: no rose colored glasses on August 16, 2009, 10:10:19 AM
Thanks he does take great pictures, really lets you get a feel for the area.  And thanks Sister for the info on KaraK.  ::MonkeyAngel::


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3 7/28/09 -
Post by: KarmaRoundUp on August 16, 2009, 10:11:20 AM
Good morning Monkeys

JVK from WS posted more McCleary images.


Quote
JVK wrote:
I was in/out of McCleary today.

Took *some* pictures in/out of town, some while driving.

Primarily I ventured east & north/east of this point here w/a GPS on foot through 'forest areas.

http://tinyurl.com/pok2za
Map of the bolded above:

Quote
http://maps.google.com/maps?f=q&source=s_q&hl=en&geocode=&q=county+line+rd+mccleary+wa&sll=47.073395,-123.257203&sspn=0.007088,0.013797&ie=UTF8&ll=47.083566,-123.260293&spn=0.007086,0.013797&t=h&z=16&iwloc=A


Sorry I forgot the link:

http://websleuths.com/forums/showthread.php?t=87157&page=29


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3 7/28/09 -
Post by: KarmaRoundUp on August 16, 2009, 10:17:39 AM
Quote
HeidisMom wrote:

The Beehive is between 6th & 7th  Doubt that info is important tho.  Your theory is a distinct possibility, I used to work there, & some family members that visited were quite "interesting"
Hi HeidisMom
But KaraK lives in the 600 block between 6th and 7th and the BeeHive addy is 401 Maple so I assumed it was located in the 400 block between 4th and 5th?


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3 7/28/09 -
Post by: KarmaRoundUp on August 16, 2009, 10:24:11 AM
KarmaR, I think it can/does have the effect.  The article you posted is so direct in that regard and kids now days read more on the net than from a book.  I'm just concerned the kids won't speak up about anything, no matter how insignificant it may seem.
That's a dang shame,I would hope her closest friends would speak up.They may not feel comfortable talking to LE but surely they would talk to Melissa.

KarmaR, I hear what you're saying, but even in the article you posted, the girls hadn't even told their parents and there were no other kids involved.  Unfortunately, kids don't often "rat" on other kids and they assuredly will not "rat" on their friends' family members, even when their personal friends are involved.  I guess that's why pure speculation bothers me in cases where there is still the possibility of a child being found alive.  If the kids talked to Melissa, they know she would go to LE so there is no way they would do that.  It's sad, the chilling effect is real.
That is very sad.


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3 7/28/09 -
Post by: KarmaRoundUp on August 16, 2009, 10:29:28 AM
An older guy matching the age of Richard Allen Phernetton that was arrested 7/20 in Montesanto was let go by the Strattleline ORV Park around the time of the search.  I don't know if it is the same person, but there can't be too many let go around that time.  I also heard he had his computer and car confiscated.  I hope someone digs a little more into this.  Also, where is karak?  She has over 125 posts from 6/28 to 7/17 and only 2 since.  She had a lot of information and may even know something about this Allen guy.  Now she seems to be very silent.  Does she know something she does not want to share?
Thank you for that info ShortCake.
This could be the same guy as a poster on WS(I think Scandi)called the park and the person she talked to who told her about this guy getting fired,had a last name that she couldn't remember,not a common last name.She did say his name was Allen something IIRC.


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3 7/28/09 -
Post by: KarmaRoundUp on August 16, 2009, 10:32:21 AM
Thanks he does take great pictures, really lets you get a feel for the area.  And thanks Sister for the info on KaraK.  ::MonkeyAngel::
You're welcome
I found it fascinating all of those beer cans out in the middle of no where.


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3 7/28/09 -
Post by: KarmaRoundUp on August 16, 2009, 10:36:17 AM
An older guy matching the age of Richard Allen Phernetton that was arrested 7/20 in Montesanto was let go by the Strattleline ORV Park around the time of the search.  I don't know if it is the same person, but there can't be too many let go around that time.  I also heard he had his computer and car confiscated.  I hope someone digs a little more into this.  Also, where is karak?  She has over 125 posts from 6/28 to 7/17 and only 2 since.  She had a lot of information and may even know something about this Allen guy.  Now she seems to be very silent.  Does she know something she does not want to share?
http://www.co.grays-harbor.wa.us/info/sheriff/JailRegisters/InmateDetail.asp?SrchNameNo=85120



Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3 7/28/09 -
Post by: KarmaRoundUp on August 16, 2009, 11:07:36 AM
An older guy matching the age of Richard Allen Phernetton that was arrested 7/20 in Montesanto was let go by the Strattleline ORV Park around the time of the search.  I don't know if it is the same person, but there can't be too many let go around that time.  I also heard he had his computer and car confiscated.  I hope someone digs a little more into this.  Also, where is karak?  She has over 125 posts from 6/28 to 7/17 and only 2 since.  She had a lot of information and may even know something about this Allen guy.  Now she seems to be very silent.  Does she know something she does not want to share?
We had posters here researching this guy named above(look in the beginning of this thread,7/27/28/09 and in thread #2,7/20/21/09)
Here is something Love4Ever posted....so this guy is a SO I'm just not sure where all the research led to.

Quote
Love4Ever wrote:
PHERNETTON, RICHARD ALLEN
Booked
7/20/2009 21:00   
Statute:
10.88.320 - Fugitive From Justice Other St
Offense:
SOFF - Sex Offense
Arrest Type:
PC
Charging Agency:
MPD-Montesano Police Department
Court:
SC2-GHC Superior Court 2
Cause No:
09-1-307-9
Released
7/31/2009 09:00   
Bail Amount:
No Bail
Disposition:
ROA-Released to Other Agency



Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3 7/28/09 -
Post by: Heidismom on August 16, 2009, 11:31:29 AM
Quote
HeidisMom wrote:

The Beehive is between 6th & 7th  Doubt that info is important tho.  Your theory is a distinct possibility, I used to work there, & some family members that visited were quite "interesting"
Hi HeidisMom
But KaraK lives in the 600 block between 6th and 7th and the BeeHive addy is 401 Maple so I assumed it was located in the 400 block between 4th and 5th?


I don't know where they start their numbers here, the Beehive is definitely between 6th & 7th, the Beehive sign is on the corner of 6th & Maple.  Fir is the other street encompassing the Beehive.

If Karak  lives in the peachy colored house she & her daughter are standing in front of in the picture, that house is between 7th & 8th, (if there was an 8th there)  actually the street ends with big cyclone  fence gates  for the sewer treatment plant.  The map shown yesterday is a little dated, 8th does not meet with Maple.  Also , on the map, it shows a big field at 6th & Fir.  That has been developed, & has 4 new houses on it, 2 on 6th st, & 2 on 5th.  The ditch (or creek) is still there, & kids still played there,  but it is quite a  narrow strip now.


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3 7/28/09 -
Post by: KarmaRoundUp on August 16, 2009, 02:09:32 PM
Thanks for the location info on the Beehive and KaraK's house.I now have to rethink about those locations as it seems I was off on the number streets.

While looking for info on the BeeHive,I ran across this below and I don't know if it's just me but this gives me a weird feeling.......This group does a mediation workshop at the BeeHive for elderly folks.Does anyone know if DD or other researchers looked into this group?


http://www.plummountain.org/?cat=3

McCleary connection:

http://www.plummountain.org/?p=125




Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3 7/28/09 -
Post by: Heidismom on August 16, 2009, 04:11:42 PM
Thanks for the location info on the Beehive and KaraK's house.I now have to rethink about those locations as it seems I was off on the number streets.

While looking for info on the BeeHive,I ran across this below and I don't know if it's just me but this gives me a weird feeling.......This group does a mediation workshop at the BeeHive for elderly folks.Does anyone know if DD or other researchers looked into this group?


http://www.plummountain.org/?cat=3

McCleary connection:

http://www.plummountain.org/?p=125





I am surprised.  The Beehive, as far as I know, is owned-operated by LDS.  I had not heard of this Plum Mountain group at all, although I knew other denominations came in  & held services on Sundays, but more mainstream religions.  How did you ever find that? 


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3 7/28/09 -
Post by: KarmaRoundUp on August 16, 2009, 05:09:29 PM
Thanks for the location info on the Beehive and KaraK's house.I now have to rethink about those locations as it seems I was off on the number streets.

While looking for info on the BeeHive,I ran across this below and I don't know if it's just me but this gives me a weird feeling.......This group does a mediation workshop at the BeeHive for elderly folks.Does anyone know if DD or other researchers looked into this group?


http://www.plummountain.org/?cat=3

McCleary connection:

http://www.plummountain.org/?p=125





I am surprised.  The Beehive, as far as I know, is owned-operated by LDS.  I had not heard of this Plum Mountain group at all, although I knew other denominations came in  & held services on Sundays, but more mainstream religions.  How did you ever find that? 
I was googling BeeHive and that link popped up in the list lol
I'm not a very good researcher but sometimes I get lucky.
The Plum Mountain group seem to be Catholic but they also follow some kinda ceremony having to do with the full moon.OK,not full moon but new moon.



Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3 7/28/09 -
Post by: Heidismom on August 16, 2009, 05:16:47 PM
Thanks for the location info on the Beehive and KaraK's house.I now have to rethink about those locations as it seems I was off on the number streets.

While looking for info on the BeeHive,I ran across this below and I don't know if it's just me but this gives me a weird feeling.......This group does a mediation workshop at the BeeHive for elderly folks.Does anyone know if DD or other researchers looked into this group?


http://www.plummountain.org/?cat=3

McCleary connection:

http://www.plummountain.org/?p=125





I am surprised.  The Beehive, as far as I know, is owned-operated by LDS.  I had not heard of this Plum Mountain group at all, although I knew other denominations came in  & held services on Sundays, but more mainstream religions.  How did you ever find that? 
I was googling BeeHive and that link popped up in the list lol
I'm not a very good researcher but sometimes I get lucky.
The Plum Mountain group seem to be Catholic but they also follow some kinda ceremony having to do with the full moon.OK,not full moon but new moon.


  Something Buddhist or maybe a mix.

  Just to clarify, the Beehive is not owned by the Mormon Church, but by Mormon members


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3 7/28/09 -
Post by: KarmaRoundUp on August 16, 2009, 05:17:20 PM
The Plum Mountain schedule for May 2009
Interesting,I wonder what they do at the Grays Harbor county jail?
This group was also in Mexico the beginning of June.Was that when Wayne Watne was there?Could Wayne be connected with this group.....The Plum group seem to be Buddhist.....maybe?

« May2009
Sun    Mon    Tue    Wed    Thu    Fri    Sat
    
1
   
2
Community Meditation Class
   
3
Kobai @ GH Co. Jail
   
4
   
5
   
6
7
   
8
Full Moon Kobai @ Thurston Reentry
   
9
Community Meditation Class
   
10
   
11
   
12
   
13
14
   
15
   
16
Community Meditation Class
   
17
   
18
Kobai @ Alzheimer's Workshop
   
19
   
20
Kobai @ La Sallian retreat
21
Kobai @ La Sallian retreat
   
22
Kobai @ La Sallian retreatNew Moon
   
23
Kobai @ La Sallian retreatCommunity Meditation Class
   
24
Kobai @ La Sallian retreat
   
25
Kobai @ La Sallian retreat
   
26
   
27
28
   
29
BKobai on Coffee-Talk Radio
   
30
Kobai in MexicoCommunity Meditation Class
   


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3 7/28/09 -
Post by: Heidismom on August 16, 2009, 05:31:40 PM
The Plum Mountain schedule for May 2009
Interesting,I wonder what they do at the Grays Harbor county jail?
This group was also in Mexico the beginning of June.Was that when Wayne Watne was there?Could Wayne be connected with this group.....The Plum group seem to be Buddhist.....maybe?

« May2009
Sun    Mon    Tue    Wed    Thu    Fri    Sat
    
1
   
2
Community Meditation Class
   
3
Kobai @ GH Co. Jail
   
4
   
5
   
6
7
   
8
Full Moon Kobai @ Thurston Reentry
   
9
Community Meditation Class
   
10
   
11
   
12
   
13
14
   
15
   
16
Community Meditation Class
   
17
   
18
Kobai @ Alzheimer's Workshop
   
19
   
20
Kobai @ La Sallian retreat
21
Kobai @ La Sallian retreat
   
22
Kobai @ La Sallian retreatNew Moon
   
23
Kobai @ La Sallian retreatCommunity Meditation Class
   
24
Kobai @ La Sallian retreat
   
25
Kobai @ La Sallian retreat
   
26
   
27
28
   
29
BKobai on Coffee-Talk Radio
   
30
Kobai in MexicoCommunity Meditation Class
   

I don't think watne would be involved in this group, since  he is with the Assembly of God, they aren't very compatible.  IF he is with Assembly of God. 

I know someone at the jail I can ask what the Plum group is there for.


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3 7/28/09 -
Post by: Heidismom on August 16, 2009, 05:44:49 PM
Nope my source from the jail didn't know what about the Plum Mountain Group.  Maybe doing a 12 step program for drinking or something.


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3 7/28/09 -
Post by: KarmaRoundUp on August 16, 2009, 05:55:19 PM
Nope my source from the jail didn't know what about the Plum Mountain Group.  Maybe doing a 12 step program for drinking or something.
From the Plum group website,they have Buddhist leaders in jails/prison that they help train so the leaders can train Buddhism in the jails.Increases their followings.
I don't know......very different group for sure.


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3 7/28/09 -
Post by: KarmaRoundUp on August 16, 2009, 06:02:33 PM
Yes,they do a 12 step program for the jails.I think the part of the group that does this is called Dharma.

http://www.plummountain.org/?cat=4



Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3 7/28/09 -
Post by: Sister on August 16, 2009, 06:51:56 PM
I'm still curious about the youth group that was meeting and then had their meetings cancelled.  Are they having them now?  Possibly these kids know something.  Just wondering as they seem a little older than Lindsey and her friends.


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3 7/28/09 -
Post by: Sister on August 16, 2009, 06:54:41 PM
An older guy matching the age of Richard Allen Phernetton that was arrested 7/20 in Montesanto was let go by the Strattleline ORV Park around the time of the search.  I don't know if it is the same person, but there can't be too many let go around that time.  I also heard he had his computer and car confiscated.  I hope someone digs a little more into this.  Also, where is karak?  She has over 125 posts from 6/28 to 7/17 and only 2 since.  She had a lot of information and may even know something about this Allen guy.  Now she seems to be very silent.  Does she know something she does not want to share?

Shortcake, do you know anymore about this Allen from the ORV Park.  What kind of car did he have, do you know if they ever said.  What he a friend to these kids?


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3 7/28/09 -
Post by: mamacrazy30 on August 16, 2009, 07:31:38 PM
jmo i would rule out the Buddhist. ::MonkeyAngel::
Quote
http://www.aboutbuddha.org/


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3 7/28/09 -
Post by: mamacrazy30 on August 16, 2009, 07:41:38 PM
jmo i would rule out the Buddhist. ::MonkeyAngel::
Quote
http://www.aboutbuddha.org/
not the 12 steppers...the Buddhist. ::MonkeyAngel::


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3 7/28/09 -
Post by: Kona Kare on August 16, 2009, 08:40:41 PM
 Have any of the locals commented on the Masons under the Sheriiffs instructions comming to Mc Cleary to hold the childrens finger printing event? 
Was there a good turn out even with such short notice? 


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3 7/28/09 -
Post by: Heidismom on August 16, 2009, 08:45:21 PM
Have any of the locals commented on the Masons under the Sheriiffs instructions comming to Mc Cleary to hold the childrens finger printing event? 
Was there a good turn out even with such short notice? 

I didn't hear about it.


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3 7/28/09 -
Post by: klaasend on August 16, 2009, 09:13:53 PM
Have any of the locals commented on the Masons under the Sheriiffs instructions comming to Mc Cleary to hold the childrens finger printing event? 
Was there a good turn out even with such short notice? 

No, hadn't heard about that.  It's a good idea though!

Welcome to SM!


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3 7/28/09 -
Post by: Scandi on August 17, 2009, 01:20:22 AM
An older guy matching the age of Richard Allen Phernetton that was arrested 7/20 in Montesanto was let go by the Strattleline ORV Park around the time of the search.  I don't know if it is the same person, but there can't be too many let go around that time.  I also heard he had his computer and car confiscated.  I hope someone digs a little more into this.  Also, where is karak?  She has over 125 posts from 6/28 to 7/17 and only 2 since.  She had a lot of information and may even know something about this Allen guy.  Now she seems to be very silent.  Does she know something she does not want to share?

Hi Shortcake and Everyone,  I wish we knew more about this RAP and so am wondering if you have a link or can tell us where you learned he was arrested and worked at the ORV Park.  I think that might be true, but now am thinking as well that since he has been released from Montesano LE to another agency, they didn't see a connection with him taking Lindsey.

It just seems if they had any inkling of his involvement with Lindsey they would have kept him locally due to an open investigation.  Now he could be incarcerated in a Fed holding cell in Wa State and not yet sent back to Mi or WI {?, getting old here and read too fast!  ;}  I guess we could check his name to see if he is back there yet.  xox


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3 7/28/09 -
Post by: shortcake on August 17, 2009, 03:26:46 AM
An older guy matching the age of Richard Allen Phernetton that was arrested 7/20 in Montesanto was let go by the Strattleline ORV Park around the time of the search.  I don't know if it is the same person, but there can't be too many let go around that time.  I also heard he had his computer and car confiscated.  I hope someone digs a little more into this.  Also, where is karak?  She has over 125 posts from 6/28 to 7/17 and only 2 since.  She had a lot of information and may even know something about this Allen guy.  Now she seems to be very silent.  Does she know something she does not want to share?
    Shortcake, do you know anymore about this Allen from the ORV Park.  What kind of car did he have, do you know if they ever said.  What he a friend to these kids?
Hi, I heard a guy about 75 was let go from the ORV Park because they did not want to be linked to any investigation. Also heard this person has an alibi for 9:30 that Friday.  The LE searched him pretty throughly.  I am not sure this is the same one arrested, but on an earlier post someone thought it was, but discarded him when they found out his age.  I have to agree, but  I still have a bad feeling about this guy.  No, I have not heard what kind of car he has or if he knows either of the kids.  The "Allen" came from someone who called the park.  I guess I should just drop it. Sorry I can't add any more.


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3 7/28/09 -
Post by: shortcake on August 17, 2009, 03:43:12 AM
An older guy matching the age of Richard Allen Phernetton that was arrested 7/20 in Montesanto was let go by the Strattleline ORV Park around the time of the search.  I don't know if it is the same person, but there can't be too many let go around that time.  I also heard he had his computer and car confiscated.  I hope someone digs a little more into this.  Also, where is karak?  She has over 125 posts from 6/28 to 7/17 and only 2 since.  She had a lot of information and may even know something about this Allen guy.  Now she seems to be very silent.  Does she know something she does not want to share?

Hi Shortcake and Everyone,  I wish we knew more about this RAP and so am wondering if you have a link or can tell us where you learned he was arrested and worked at the ORV Park.  I think that might be true, but now am thinking as well that since he has been released from Montesano LE to another agency, they didn't see a connection with him taking Lindsey.

It just seems if they had any inkling of his involvement with Lindsey they would have kept him locally due to an open investigation.  Now he could be incarcerated in a Fed holding cell in Wa State and not yet sent back to Mi or WI {?, getting old here and read too fast!  ;}  I guess we could check his name to see if he is back there yet.  xox
Hi, I agree this guy seems not to be involved with the case or the LE would have held him.  Just don't feel good about this "Allen" person.  Probably has no connection to the case.  Just hope we find her soon and seems like Lindsey is not getting the attention she needs, especially in McCleary.  Sorry McCleary, but shame on you, if you can't even donate your Community Center or someplace for a central location to help find Lindsey.  I'll get off my box now.


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3 7/28/09 -
Post by: KarmaRoundUp on August 17, 2009, 07:07:42 AM
I'm still curious about the youth group that was meeting and then had their meetings cancelled.  Are they having them now?  Possibly these kids know something.  Just wondering as they seem a little older than Lindsey and her friends.
Yikes,I don't recall a youth group meeting?


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3 7/28/09 -
Post by: KarmaRoundUp on August 17, 2009, 07:17:29 AM
Have any of the locals commented on the Masons under the Sheriiffs instructions comming to Mc Cleary to hold the childrens finger printing event? 
Was there a good turn out even with such short notice? 
Welcome to scaredmonkeys Kona Kare.
They were discussing this a bit at WS yesterday and a couple of posters(I don't know if they are locals)said they didn't even know they were doing the fingerprinting when they did it.I'll get the links for you.
From JVK at WS,he/she has some pics taken of the fingerprinting event.JVK says this whole event was put on by the EverGreen Christian Center.

http://s242.photobucket.com/albums/ff92/BGL78/?newest=1

WS link:http://websleuths.com/forums/showthread.php?t=87157&page=29



Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3 7/28/09 -
Post by: Kona Kare on August 17, 2009, 11:26:11 AM
    ::MonkeyKiss::  Thanks, Glad to post with all of you!  Yes the unexpected Chip program carried out by the Mason"s was a cool thing for the kids in McCleary who are still anxious about Lindsey's abduction.  Usually these programs are planned and promoted in advance to secure a good turn out.  I find it curious and interesting that this was an unannouced event put on by these sweet people.  This is a free finger printing service provided by our state and Law Enforcemnet (sheriff's) back this program.   ::MonkeyCool::  never too late!  The pictures are interesting that were provided along with the chip program pics.  Why was this area chosen for pics and where is this?  I'm not understanding why a particular area is photographed verses the million others ares in and around McCleary?  Saturday in McCleary was a busy day focused on Lindsey.  LE must be frustrated at all the loose ends they have turned over.  I hope the Sheriff's dept. sends a spokesperson free of charge  to hold a town meeting about the dangers of internet social groups.  Adults connected to this case can blog about how great it is to be a stay at home mom to get their "warm fuzzies" (very self promoting riding on the wings of a missing child)  Feeling like Robin Williams, "Good Morning McCleary ", time to open up those sleepy eyes!     ::MonkeyRoll::


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3 7/28/09 -
Post by: no rose colored glasses on August 17, 2009, 12:52:36 PM
Kona Kare  WELCOME  ::MonkeyCool:: Great post, and you brought up some very good questions.


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3 7/28/09 -
Post by: Scandi on August 17, 2009, 02:57:35 PM
An older guy matching the age of Richard Allen Phernetton that was arrested 7/20 in Montesanto was let go by the Strattleline ORV Park around the time of the search.  I don't know if it is the same person, but there can't be too many let go around that time.  I also heard he had his computer and car confiscated.  I hope someone digs a little more into this.  Also, where is karak?  She has over 125 posts from 6/28 to 7/17 and only 2 since.  She had a lot of information and may even know something about this Allen guy.  Now she seems to be very silent.  Does she know something she does not want to share?

Hi Shortcake and Everyone,  I wish we knew more about this RAP and so am wondering if you have a link or can tell us where you learned he was arrested and worked at the ORV Park.  I think that might be true, but now am thinking as well that since he has been released from Montesano LE to another agency, they didn't see a connection with him taking Lindsey.

It just seems if they had any inkling of his involvement with Lindsey they would have kept him locally due to an open investigation.  Now he could be incarcerated in a Fed holding cell in Wa State and not yet sent back to Mi or WI {?, getting old here and read too fast!  ;}  I guess we could check his name to see if he is back there yet.  xox
Hi, I agree this guy seems not to be involved with the case or the LE would have held him.  Just don't feel good about this "Allen" person.  Probably has no connection to the case.  Just hope we find her soon and seems like Lindsey is not getting the attention she needs, especially in McCleary.  Sorry McCleary, but shame on you, if you can't even donate your Community Center or someplace for a central location to help find Lindsey.  I'll get off my box now.

Hi Shortcake and thanks for the response.  I was hoping you could say how you learned he worked at the ORV Park, but at this point it probably doesn't matter. 

The rumor was he had a daughter Lindsey's age and they knew each other.  That is one point that interested me as a sleuther.  It would be nice to have a yea or nay to that although I realize Shortcake that didn't come from you.

I do find it interesting that Richard A P has not been listed as CAPTURED on the Washburn County 'Most Wanted' list.  Close to a month has passed since his arrest.  And since his warrant was put out in 2001 you'd think they would be oh so thankful to let the public in WI know he was now incarcerated.

If anyone knows how to check out if he is now in custody back in WI that would be neat.


Shortcake, there must be a reason a space has not been given for a search center for Lindsey in McCleary.  I don't think it is because the community doesn't care.  It could be a regional thing as I don't think I've seen that done in the Pacific Northwest.  Also LE might not a separate office if they want all direction in the case to come from one place.  That would be the search and investigation office they have set up now in Montesano.  I read in an article they have 3 full time officers staffing it.  xoxox


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3 7/28/09 -
Post by: Edward on August 17, 2009, 04:36:42 PM
Hi Scandi..

Good questions and good thoughts..

Scandi is one of my favorite W/S elite seasoned sleuth's..   :smt023


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3 7/28/09 -
Post by: Scandi on August 17, 2009, 08:19:47 PM
Hi Scandi..

Good questions and good thoughts..

Scandi is one of my favorite W/S elite seasoned sleuth's..   :smt023

Why than you kindly Edward for such a nice compliment. 
 ::MonkeyKiss::  I have always enjoyed your posts as well.

I just called the Shell Lake WI police dept and the officer answering was Johnny on the spot with an answer for me about RAP.  He said yes he is there and has bonded out of jail.  I also asked the officer if that meant they were not looking at him re the disappearance of Lindsey Baum in McCleary Wa.  He said he has heard nothing about this man being linked to her case.

Onward and upward we go IMO in looking at other possibilities    (http://img103.exs.cx/img103/2150/d8jdetective2.gif)   xox


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3 7/28/09 -
Post by: no rose colored glasses on August 17, 2009, 08:22:27 PM
Thanks Scandi  ::MonkeyCool::


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3 7/28/09 -
Post by: Sister on August 17, 2009, 09:00:21 PM
I'm still curious about the youth group that was meeting and then had their meetings cancelled.  Are they having them now?  Possibly these kids know something.  Just wondering as they seem a little older than Lindsey and her friends.
Yikes,I don't recall a youth group meeting?

snipped from July:
they THINK the services they have stopped are:
Saturday night
Sunday Night
Wednesday Night
AND THE YOUTH GROUP which was on FRIDAY nights


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3 7/28/09 -
Post by: Scandi on August 17, 2009, 10:03:26 PM
Thanks Scandi  ::MonkeyCool::

Denada Dah'ling!

Do you think LE would need a specific reason to search the surrounding logging roads in the area?  There must be people in the area that know those roads like the back of their hand, and that is what it would take.  I don't think the perp would drive too far into a forest.  I wonder how often people use these roads?  I know there are brush pickers, and don't know if they still are logging in the area much anymore.

There was an oriental lady back in the 80's I believe whose body was found along a logging road on the outskirts of Montesano.  It is unsolved, although many think the hubby could have been the perp.  ???  I'm going to look that case up and see how long it was from her going missing till she was discovered.   xox


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3 7/28/09 -
Post by: Scandi on August 18, 2009, 01:25:13 AM
Here is a link to a thread about 'Elma Woods ~ Jane Doe' from WS.  The detective from Grays Harbor County who investigated her case is a member at WS and gives excellent descriptions of the area and these logging roads.  Note post #15.

She was found outside Elma, not Montesano, on Oct 24th, 1988.  They estimate she died between 1982 and 1987.  That means she was dead in the woods for at least a year and up to 5 years before she was found by a mushroom picker.

http://www.websleuths.com/forums/showthread.php?t=44275&highlight=jane+elma (http://www.websleuths.com/forums/showthread.php?t=44275&highlight=jane+elma)

xox



Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3 7/28/09 -
Post by: KarmaRoundUp on August 18, 2009, 06:04:40 AM
I'm still curious about the youth group that was meeting and then had their meetings cancelled.  Are they having them now?  Possibly these kids know something.  Just wondering as they seem a little older than Lindsey and her friends.
Yikes,I don't recall a youth group meeting?

snipped from July:
they THINK the services they have stopped are:
Saturday night
Sunday Night
Wednesday Night
AND THE YOUTH GROUP which was on FRIDAY nights

Thank you Sister
Was this group meeting in McCleary or Elma?


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3 7/28/09 -
Post by: Sister on August 18, 2009, 07:50:11 AM
I'm still curious about the youth group that was meeting and then had their meetings cancelled.  Are they having them now?  Possibly these kids know something.  Just wondering as they seem a little older than Lindsey and her friends.
Yikes,I don't recall a youth group meeting?

snipped from July:
they THINK the services they have stopped are:
Saturday night
Sunday Night
Wednesday Night
AND THE YOUTH GROUP which was on FRIDAY nights

Thank you Sister
Was this group meeting in McCleary or Elma?

You're welcome and good morning.
Northwest Life Center
215 N. 3rd street
Elma, Wa   
There is quite a bit of information about this church in the Weird & Strange thread.  I haven't heard if the pastor Roundtree has come back from Missouri yet.


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3 7/28/09 -
Post by: no rose colored glasses on August 18, 2009, 09:48:52 AM
Here is a link to a thread about 'Elma Woods ~ Jane Doe' from WS.  The detective from Grays Harbor County who investigated her case is a member at WS and gives excellent descriptions of the area and these logging roads.  Note post #15.

She was found outside Elma, not Montesano, on Oct 24th, 1988.  They estimate she died between 1982 and 1987.  That means she was dead in the woods for at least a year and up to 5 years before she was found by a mushroom picker.

http://www.websleuths.com/forums/showthread.php?t=44275&highlight=jane+elma (http://www.websleuths.com/forums/showthread.php?t=44275&highlight=jane+elma)

xox


Thanks, very interesting.


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3 7/28/09 -
Post by: sherip on August 18, 2009, 01:37:34 PM
Thanks Scandi  ::MonkeyCool::

Denada Dah'ling!

Do you think LE would need a specific reason to search the surrounding logging roads in the area?  There must be people in the area that know those roads like the back of their hand, and that is what it would take.  I don't think the perp would drive too far into a forest.  I wonder how often people use these roads?  I know there are brush pickers, and don't know if they still are logging in the area much anymore.

There was an oriental lady back in the 80's I believe whose body was found along a logging road on the outskirts of Montesano.  It is unsolved, although many think the hubby could have been the perp.  ???  I'm going to look that case up and see how long it was from her going missing till she was discovered.   xox

There are hundreds and hundreds of miles of forrest service and logging roads in this area.  Capitol Forest alone is 91,650 acres  (166 miles of single track and 575 miles of road)  And the you move into the thousands of miles of the Olympic National Forest.  I think it is almost by accident when the remains of a person are found in these areas.  Someone posted some areial shots of the area awhile back which I will try to find and bring forward  - that will sort of give you a visual of what searchers are dealing with.





 


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3 7/28/09 -
Post by: Scandi on August 18, 2009, 03:23:28 PM
 ::MonkeyCheer4::  What a HELLO cute little Monkey, and thanks Sherip.  There is a local poster who has a niggling thought she could be off a logging road between McCleary and Shelton.  I just don't know if LE would search these old roads without some specific reason in following up a lead.  It would be a real time burner.

I do know there will be some open areas off those roads, as Chantrelle's grow on a specific slope that lies in a specific direction and there is some sunlight that is needed for them to grow.  The spot has to meet every requirement or they don't grow there.  Those woods are a great spot to pick these mushrooms at the right time of year.

See ya tonight!


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3 7/28/09 -
Post by: sherip on August 18, 2009, 04:53:48 PM
::MonkeyCheer4::  What a HELLO cute little Monkey, and thanks Sherip.  There is a local poster who has a niggling thought she could be off a logging road between McCleary and Shelton.  I just don't know if LE would search these old roads without some specific reason in following up a lead.  It would be a real time burner.

I do know there will be some open areas off those roads, as Chantrelle's grow on a specific slope that lies in a specific direction and there is some sunlight that is needed for them to grow.  The spot has to meet every requirement or they don't grow there.  Those woods are a great spot to pick these mushrooms at the right time of year.

See ya tonight!


Do you know why that person would not search themselves if they know the area?  I am close enough to give it a shot if you have some specifics on where to go.....I just really, really hope that it is bad information, finding something would be horrible -  You can get my email information from klaas to contact me directly if you would like.  (I have picked chantrelle's before so I do know what type of area you are talking about.)


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3 7/28/09 -
Post by: Edward on August 18, 2009, 05:34:06 PM
I hope it is good information and I hope you find her..

If you are not experienced in searching here is a thought for you to walk with..

1. Do Not touch anything..and Take somebody along with you, but do not bring dogs as they may trample on evidence.

2. Before you see anything you may smell something, you will know.. stop and call police.

3. If you walk up on the situation without odors, back out on your own foot steps and show officers where you yourself stepped so as to protect evidence. This may prove valuable later in court


It is obvious by now that something is not right.. Be ready and willing to bring closure to this family. 

jmho


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3 7/28/09 -
Post by: KarmaRoundUp on August 18, 2009, 05:42:28 PM
I'm still curious about the youth group that was meeting and then had their meetings cancelled.  Are they having them now?  Possibly these kids know something.  Just wondering as they seem a little older than Lindsey and her friends.
Yikes,I don't recall a youth group meeting?

snipped from July:
they THINK the services they have stopped are:
Saturday night
Sunday Night
Wednesday Night
AND THE YOUTH GROUP which was on FRIDAY nights

Thank you Sister
Was this group meeting in McCleary or Elma?

You're welcome and good morning.
Northwest Life Center
215 N. 3rd street
Elma, Wa   
There is quite a bit of information about this church in the Weird & Strange thread.  I haven't heard if the pastor Roundtree has come back from Missouri yet.
Thanks Sister.I remember that church now.I wonder if pastor Roundtree is connected to the Round...something restaurant in McCleary......


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3 7/28/09 -
Post by: Sister on August 18, 2009, 10:05:51 PM
I'm still curious about the youth group that was meeting and then had their meetings cancelled.  Are they having them now?  Possibly these kids know something.  Just wondering as they seem a little older than Lindsey and her friends.
Yikes,I don't recall a youth group meeting?

snipped from July:
they THINK the services they have stopped are:
Saturday night
Sunday Night
Wednesday Night
AND THE YOUTH GROUP which was on FRIDAY nights

Thank you Sister
Was this group meeting in McCleary or Elma?

You're welcome and good morning.
Northwest Life Center
215 N. 3rd street
Elma, Wa   
There is quite a bit of information about this church in the Weird & Strange thread.  I haven't heard if the pastor Roundtree has come back from Missouri yet.
Thanks Sister.I remember that church now.I wonder if pastor Roundtree is connected to the Round...something restaurant in McCleary......

KarmaR, I don't think so.  It is:
Rounders
202 W Simpson Ave
McCleary, WA 98557

restuarant


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3 7/28/09 -
Post by: mamacrazy30 on August 18, 2009, 10:20:18 PM
please just read it ::MonkeyAngel::
Quote
http://forensicastrology.blogspot.com/2009/07/lindsey-baum.html
::MonkeyAngel::


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3 7/28/09 -
Post by: Sister on August 18, 2009, 10:43:07 PM
please just read it ::MonkeyAngel::
Quote
http://forensicastrology.blogspot.com/2009/07/lindsey-baum.html
::MonkeyAngel::
Mamacrazy, a very interesting read.


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3 7/28/09 -
Post by: Haddie McFaddies Mom on August 18, 2009, 11:13:37 PM
please just read it ::MonkeyAngel::
Quote
http://forensicastrology.blogspot.com/2009/07/lindsey-baum.html
::MonkeyAngel::

Hi mamacrazy ~ Thanks for that.  I forgot I had seen that a week or so ago.  There are also these that you may find interesting: (they are both in regards to Lindsey)

http://psychicsunitetofindmissingchildren.blogspot.com/2009/08/lindsey-baum-comments.html (http://psychicsunitetofindmissingchildren.blogspot.com/2009/08/lindsey-baum-comments.html)

http://psychicsunitetofindmissingchildren.blogspot.com/search?updated-max=2009-08-09T16%3A18%3A00-04%3A00&max-results=7 (http://psychicsunitetofindmissingchildren.blogspot.com/search?updated-max=2009-08-09T16%3A18%3A00-04%3A00&max-results=7)



Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3 7/28/09 -
Post by: mamacrazy30 on August 18, 2009, 11:52:26 PM
sister and haddie's mom i just thank you both for reading it.  sometimes when things don't make sense they can...i believe in a situation like this we have to think outside the box and i really mean OUTSIDE!  i don't think many of us can get inside the head of a child molester and if we can then we have a leg up....sometimes it takes what could be considered 'crazy thoughts' to lead to the brain-storm that will take us on maybe a 'crazy path'.  but..it's been so long that Lindsy has been missing, with no trace (that we know of anyway).  i am open to anything that might bring Lindsey home ::MonkeyAngel::


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3 7/28/09 -
Post by: Sister on August 19, 2009, 12:05:54 AM
Mamacrazy, I agree, it's all about bring Lindsey home.
I have no knowledge of astrology, but articles such as the one you posted are very interesting to read.  It did not seem to be written by some whacko, so you're right, thinking outside of the box is good.


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3 7/28/09 -
Post by: Haddie McFaddies Mom on August 19, 2009, 12:10:29 AM
I couldn't agree with you more mamacrazy.   ::MonkeyAngel::
And sadly, it's about all we've got at this point

Keeping the drive alive for you Lindsey Baby Girl ~  ::MonkeyAngel::


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3 7/28/09 -
Post by: mamacrazy30 on August 19, 2009, 12:11:41 AM
whatever it takes to bring Lindsey home ::MonkeyAngel:: ::MonkeyAngel:: ::MonkeyAngel::


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3 7/28/09 -
Post by: mamacrazy30 on August 19, 2009, 12:15:54 AM
Quote
I can see an image. I’m seeing it as if I’m looking up at it from a wooded area and the image keeps changing… a tower? A satellite? And then something that sound like Seattle. Those swirly things may be spinning or vibrating??

 are there Washington monkeys that know if windmills are in the area??


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3 7/28/09 -
Post by: mamacrazy30 on August 19, 2009, 12:20:23 AM
Monkeys.. i have to call it a night......
babycrazy's first day of school is tomorrow.. ::MonkeyWaa::
have to sleep to get her off to a good day...bbl ::MonkeyAngel:: ::MonkeyAngel:: ::MonkeyAngel:: ::MonkeyAngel:: ::MonkeyAngel::


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3 7/28/09 -
Post by: Scandi on August 19, 2009, 12:53:19 AM
whatever it takes to bring Lindsey home ::MonkeyAngel:: ::MonkeyAngel:: ::MonkeyAngel::

Hi Mamacrazy,  And that will be the truth which IMO will set Lindsey free from wherever she is so she can come back home to her family and friends.

There are two basic things I have learned in sleuthing crimes over the last several years.  First, these crimes get solved by continually re-examining the scene of the crime.  Here that would be where she was last seen IMO.  Second, changing statements always draw up  BIG RED FLAGS.

The two last people to see Lindsey besides the perp were the two witnesses who told LE they saw her walking on Maple between 6th and 7th.  We don't know who they are.  But we do know the person who watched her start on her walk and followed her with her eyes to 6th when trees began to hide Lindsey.  That was her friend MK, a minor, who has been traumatized since her friend disappeared.

I don't know what protocol is here is discussing a member who was also one of the last to see Lindsey, which is the place we can start disecting what we have been told. 

Once a person has started to change statements I can't see how it can be excused.  It is similar, but not the same, as Misty in Haleigh's case, where she changed her stories so often LE now feels she is the key to unraveling the case.  I feel the same about MK's mom.  If it is not appropriate to discuss here Klaas, I understand.  But I think it is a way to find out more about what really happened.

I do think it is very odd that MK would stand and watch Lindsey start her walk home, to the point of a little over a block walk.  Why would that be necessary.  It is just an odd point I don't understand.  xox
                 


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3 7/28/09 -
Post by: Jademoff on August 19, 2009, 01:09:00 AM
Quote
I can see an image. I’m seeing it as if I’m looking up at it from a wooded area and the image keeps changing… a tower? A satellite? And then something that sound like Seattle. Those swirly things may be spinning or vibrating??

 are there Washington monkeys that know if windmills are in the area??

Satsop Washington (about 10 minutes away from McCleary) has a Nuclear Power Plant site that has never been used. Here is a website on it. Notice the description to the surrounding area is similar to what was seen in the image.

http://ludb.clui.org/ex/i/WA3288/

He is a top view picture of it

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Satsop_Development_Park_07780.JPG


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3 7/28/09 -
Post by: Lovinlife on August 19, 2009, 01:27:20 AM
Thanks Jademoff and Welcome to Scared Monkeys!!! WE are glad that YOU are here!!! 
::MonkeyCheer4:: ::MonkeyCheer4:: ::MonkeyCheer4::


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3 7/28/09 -
Post by: Jademoff on August 19, 2009, 02:52:59 AM
Thank you for the welcome.

As I have mentioned, I am a local to here, and used to work at Gordon's Select Market for 5 years. I'm familiar with faces and some locations and I'll help out with as much as I can.

McCleary gets a lot of people traveling through in the summertime. It's one of the gateway towns that the people from the big cities have to go through in order to get to the beach. They also come to the area to go camping, fishing, to the ORV park, and to the casinos. But seeing as she didn't even make it to the road that the Shell station is on, I just don't see a traveler through just picking her up, but someone familiar with the area.

I'm kind of wondering about this 'These swirly things that may be spinning or vibrating'. There is a Laundromat that is on Simpson Ave, about a block away from 6th street. It's in the same shopping mall at the Video store and the Subway.


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3 7/28/09 -
Post by: Sister on August 19, 2009, 08:11:46 AM
whatever it takes to bring Lindsey home ::MonkeyAngel:: ::MonkeyAngel:: ::MonkeyAngel::

Hi Mamacrazy,  And that will be the truth which IMO will set Lindsey free from wherever she is so she can come back home to her family and friends.

There are two basic things I have learned in sleuthing crimes over the last several years.  First, these crimes get solved by continually re-examining the scene of the crime.  Here that would be where she was last seen IMO.  Second, changing statements always draw up  BIG RED FLAGS.

The two last people to see Lindsey besides the perp were the two witnesses who told LE they saw her walking on Maple between 6th and 7th.  We don't know who they are.  But we do know the person who watched her start on her walk and followed her with her eyes to 6th when trees began to hide Lindsey.  That was her friend MK, a minor, who has been traumatized since her friend disappeared.

I don't know what protocol is here is discussing a member who was also one of the last to see Lindsey, which is the place we can start disecting what we have been told. 

Once a person has started to change statements I can't see how it can be excused.  It is similar, but not the same, as Misty in Haleigh's case, where she changed her stories so often LE now feels she is the key to unraveling the case.  I feel the same about MK's mom.  If it is not appropriate to discuss here Klaas, I understand.  But I think it is a way to find out more about what really happened.

I do think it is very odd that MK would stand and watch Lindsey start her walk home, to the point of a little over a block walk.  Why would that be necessary.  It is just an odd point I don't understand.  xox
                 

Scandi, I understand what you are saying, however, the last people to see her were the witnesses around 6th street.  I don't know if it has ever been figured out who they are.  Also, the dogs (both LEs and the private Is) did track her scent to an area on 6th street and then poof! how does someone poof?  the only answer I come up with is she got into a vehicle.  So my questions are who are these witnesses and what, if anything, has been done to figure out about the alleged white car following different kids around.


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3 7/28/09 -
Post by: no rose colored glasses on August 19, 2009, 09:48:26 AM
whatever it takes to bring Lindsey home ::MonkeyAngel:: ::MonkeyAngel:: ::MonkeyAngel::

Hi Mamacrazy,  And that will be the truth which IMO will set Lindsey free from wherever she is so she can come back home to her family and friends.

There are two basic things I have learned in sleuthing crimes over the last several years.  First, these crimes get solved by continually re-examining the scene of the crime.  Here that would be where she was last seen IMO.  Second, changing statements always draw up  BIG RED FLAGS.

The two last people to see Lindsey besides the perp were the two witnesses who told LE they saw her walking on Maple between 6th and 7th.  We don't know who they are.  But we do know the person who watched her start on her walk and followed her with her eyes to 6th when trees began to hide Lindsey.  That was her friend MK, a minor, who has been traumatized since her friend disappeared.

I don't know what protocol is here is discussing a member who was also one of the last to see Lindsey, which is the place we can start disecting what we have been told. 

Once a person has started to change statements I can't see how it can be excused.  It is similar, but not the same, as Misty in Haleigh's case, where she changed her stories so often LE now feels she is the key to unraveling the case.  I feel the same about MK's mom.  If it is not appropriate to discuss here Klaas, I understand.  But I think it is a way to find out more about what really happened.

I do think it is very odd that MK would stand and watch Lindsey start her walk home, to the point of a little over a block walk.  Why would that be necessary.  It is just an odd point I don't understand.  xox
                 
I couldn't agree more, what was the point of watching her walk to the point of a little over a block? Makes no sense to me.


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3 7/28/09 -
Post by: no rose colored glasses on August 19, 2009, 09:49:39 AM
Thanks Jademoff and Welcome to Scared Monkeys!!! WE are glad that YOU are here!!! 
::MonkeyCheer4:: ::MonkeyCheer4:: ::MonkeyCheer4::
That goes for me also  ::MonkeyCool::


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3 7/28/09 -
Post by: Haddie McFaddies Mom on August 19, 2009, 12:38:29 PM
Monkeys.. i have to call it a night......
babycrazy's first day of school is tomorrow.. ::MonkeyWaa::
have to sleep to get her off to a good day...bbl ::MonkeyAngel:: ::MonkeyAngel:: ::MonkeyAngel:: ::MonkeyAngel:: ::MonkeyAngel::

"babycrazy's first day of school is tomorrow"

 ::MonkeyHaHa:: 
Thanks mamacrazy . . . Tickled my funnybone just when I needed it and remembering Haddie's first day of school  ::MonkeyAngel::
~


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3 7/28/09 -
Post by: Jademoff on August 19, 2009, 12:50:33 PM
Quote
I can see an image. I’m seeing it as if I’m looking up at it from a wooded area and the image keeps changing… a tower? A satellite? And then something that sound like Seattle. Those swirly things may be spinning or vibrating??

 are there Washington monkeys that know if windmills are in the area??

A water tower even. The one in Elma is located up at the top of Strawberry Hill in the middle of some woods too. Wonder if the areas have been checked.


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3 7/28/09 -
Post by: MonkeyinSC on August 19, 2009, 01:14:28 PM
Quote
I can see an image. I’m seeing it as if I’m looking up at it from a wooded area and the image keeps changing… a tower? A satellite? And then something that sound like Seattle. Those swirly things may be spinning or vibrating??

 are there Washington monkeys that know if windmills are in the area??

A water tower even. The one in Elma is located up at the top of Strawberry Hill in the middle of some woods too. Wonder if the areas have been checked.

I found an old post from Scandi... 7/27/09 in LB thread #2, post #1645:
"I also asked about the Water Tower in McCleary in the SE section of town.  He basically said if anything had been done to breech the water tower they would have known about it as the water pressure would change.  He said they know it was not breeched as nothing has shown up on the guages"(D-OH...sorry, still learning here...I'm not sure how to quote an old post inside of a new post....)


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3 7/28/09 -
Post by: A_News_Junkie_Monkey on August 19, 2009, 01:17:08 PM
SCANDI - I asked Skye (know as Double decker here, or DD about the logging lead and she wrote this below and this is the only way I have to contact you.)

OT for SCANDI
but I do have someone info for scandi from someone who said they could answer some questions being asked, can you tell her. someone wants to pass some info to her, I guess about something they saw her asking.

ps they just got ahold of me today to tell me they wanted to pass some info to scandi

Her website addy is:  http://truecrime.forums-free.com/    or you can send me an email ( my addy is in profile and I can get a message to her that way.)

Sorry again for the OT monkeys - lets get some answers for Lindsey! 



Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3 7/28/09 -
Post by: no rose colored glasses on August 19, 2009, 01:20:01 PM
SCANDI - I asked Skye (know as Double decker here, or DD about the logging lead and she wrote this below and this is the only way I have to contact you.)

OT for SCANDI
but I do have someone info for scandi from someone who said they could answer some questions being asked, can you tell her. someone wants to pass some info to her, I guess about something they saw her asking.

ps they just got ahold of me today to tell me they wanted to pass some info to scandi

Her website addy is:  http://truecrime.forums-free.com/    or you can send me an email ( my addy is in profile and I can get a message to her that way.)

Sorry again for the OT monkeys - lets get some answers for Lindsey! 


Very interesting, please let's get some answers for Lindsey  ::MonkeyAngel::


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3 7/28/09 -
Post by: crazybabyborg on August 19, 2009, 01:30:43 PM
SCANDI - I asked Skye (know as Double decker here, or DD about the logging lead and she wrote this below and this is the only way I have to contact you.)

OT for SCANDI
but I do have someone info for scandi from someone who said they could answer some questions being asked, can you tell her. someone wants to pass some info to her, I guess about something they saw her asking.

ps they just got ahold of me today to tell me they wanted to pass some info to scandi

Her website addy is:  http://truecrime.forums-free.com/    or you can send me an email ( my addy is in profile and I can get a message to her that way.)

Sorry again for the OT monkeys - lets get some answers for Lindsey! 


Very interesting, please let's get some answers for Lindsey  ::MonkeyAngel::

Hi Monkeys!

I keep hoping something will break in this case. Yes, I keep praying for answers that will lead to Lindsey! 


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3 7/28/09 -
Post by: Edward on August 19, 2009, 01:34:04 PM

Sabrina Rasmussen was 11 Tacoma Washington.. May 31 2000

Normally, her mom would have given her a ride to school. But the family car had been stolen days earlier, so Rasmussen set out to walk the six blocks from her home to Gault Middle School in Tacoma.

She started walking with a friend, but when the friend took a shortcut, Rasmussen was left alone.

That's when her abductor swooped in. Rasmussen sprinted from the man who jumped out of the pickup, but with her black-and-pink backpack weighing down her 4-foot-3 frame, she could hear the sound of his jingling keys growing louder. She screamed and he gagged her with his hand.

Police say Adhahn pushed Rasmussen against the truck's gray interior.

About 8 a.m., the two arrived at the Fort Lewis woods. He told her he wouldn't kill her.

"I was like, 'OK, whatever,'" Rasmussen recalled thinking. "Just hurry up. Do it. Get it over with."

When her attacker finished, she heard a lighter spark his cigarette. She asked if he was going to set her on fire. As his truck started, she pleaded for him not to run her over, though Rasmussen was sure he would.

Then he drove away.

"It was silent," she said. "That was it."



Then he found his nexyt victim....

A 12-year-old Tacoma girl named Zina Linnik had been abducted from behind her home during a July 4 neighborhood fireworks display.
The culprit "Adhahn" had guided detectives to the body.


Sabrina Rasmussen
"That could have been me at 11 years old," Rasmussen said in an interview at her mother's Tacoma-area home. "I'm pretty lucky to be alive today."
She identified him as her attacker..


http://www.seattlepi.com/local/326224_sabrina03.html







Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3 7/28/09 -
Post by: Edward on August 19, 2009, 01:37:08 PM
She cried as she told Avriett how Joseph Edward Duncan III shot her brother in the stomach at a campsite, then shot him again in the head and burned the body.
“He’s killed way a lot more people that you don’t even know about,” Shasta told the officer. “He killed Dylan.”

The testimony came on the second day of the sentencing hearing for Duncan, 45, who faces either life in prison or death. The convicted pedophile from Tacoma, Washington, pleaded guilty in December to 10 federal charges related to the kidnapping of Shasta and Dylan.

http://ac360.blogs.cnn.com/2008/08/15/abducted-girl-describes-brothers-murder/


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3 7/28/09 -
Post by: mvdswaluw on August 19, 2009, 01:46:28 PM
Hello, I'm new here. Just got my account approved yesterday. I've been the Lindsey-threads for a few weeks now.

Today I've found these words from Kara on her myspace account. http://blogs.myspace.com/index.cfm?fuseaction=blog.ListAll&friendId=224168248 (http://blogs.myspace.com/index.cfm?fuseaction=blog.ListAll&friendId=224168248).
I've read that a lot of you have unanswered questions. This seems an option to get some answers...

I've also had a short email conversation with klaasend that I would like to share in case local LE reads these pages.
Quote
For now I'm just interested in the Lindsey Baum case. Don't know why, but it's on my mind 24/7. Maybe because she looks a bit like my three year old daughter.

The day I subscribe, or tried to, I wanted to post something. Beeing a radio planner for the public safety communications network, I easily spot antenna's (even from above). I know that from so called CDR's (call detailed records), it is possible to see what handheld has been close to a particular base station (even if no call was made). The parking lot between Lindsey's home and the gas station draws my attention. If I would have to walk the route Lindsey should have, I would take the shortest route and would walk trough the gas station and straight trough the parking lot. With the view blocked by trees and bushes in any direction except east, this parking lot seems a perfect place to quickly pull someone into a car and drive of. The gas station seems to have some antennas in a pole right behind the station. So if someone with a handheld has taken Lindsey from the area surrounding the gas station, and was carrying a cellphone he probably was registered at that basestation. As base stations have a limited service area, he would have registered to an other base station as he would travel out of town with Lindsey.

So all cellphones registered at the site that gives coverage to the parking lot, that have moved from there around the time Lindsey went missing, might belong to who took her... Just ask telephone operators to look into this and pass any findings to LE.

Looking at JVK's pictures of the Shell station. I see I've made a mistake. The pole behind the Shell station has transformers in it and no antennas. However the theory is still valid.

Milan.


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3 7/28/09 -
Post by: Haddie McFaddies Mom on August 19, 2009, 01:49:06 PM
Quote
I can see an image. I’m seeing it as if I’m looking up at it from a wooded area and the image keeps changing… a tower? A satellite? And then something that sound like Seattle. Those swirly things may be spinning or vibrating??

 are there Washington monkeys that know if windmills are in the area??

A water tower even. The one in Elma is located up at the top of Strawberry Hill in the middle of some woods too. Wonder if the areas have been checked.

I found an old post from Scandi... 7/27/09 in LB thread #2, post #1645:
"I also asked about the Water Tower in McCleary in the SE section of town.  He basically said if anything had been done to breech the water tower they would have known about it as the water pressure would change.  He said they know it was not breeched as nothing has shown up on the guages"(D-OH...sorry, still learning here...I'm not sure how to quote an old post inside of a new post....)

Nice job MonkeyinSC ~ and welcome!  I was going to post that I recalled Scandi being all over this, but you were right on it ~
 :smt006


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3 7/28/09 -
Post by: Edward on August 19, 2009, 01:54:31 PM
Child preditors sometimes keep there victims alive..

If Lindsey is not a threat he may have kept her alive.. and she would be under his control unless somebody spots her, possibly living in some out of the way enviorment in the wilderness.


With prosecutors expected to file charges soon against a nomadic homeless couple in the disappearance of Elizabeth Smart, her family waged a concerted effort today to portray her as having been incapable of escape during months of wandering streets and canyons almost within sight of her home.

Responding to increasingly direct questions about what happened to Elizabeth, now 15, after she was taken at knifepoint from her bed on June 5, relatives attending a church service this morning took pains to explain that, while they had not pressed Elizabeth for details, they were certain she had been left brainwashed by the man she knew as Emmanuel.

''She had no ability to control her life,'' Charles Smart, her paternal grandfather and a retired heart surgeon, told the congregation at a packed Mormon church near the Smart home. ''She was completely controlled by Emmanuel.''




You just do not know if she is alive or not..

Even though these cases exist of victims being alive .. It is rare and most of the time the victim has been murdered.

 


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3 7/28/09 -
Post by: Haddie McFaddies Mom on August 19, 2009, 01:54:47 PM
Hello, I'm new here. Just got my account approved yesterday. I've been the Lindsey-threads for a few weeks now.

Today I've found these words from Kara on her myspace account. http://blogs.myspace.com/index.cfm?fuseaction=blog.ListAll&friendId=224168248 (http://blogs.myspace.com/index.cfm?fuseaction=blog.ListAll&friendId=224168248).
I've read that a lot of you have unanswered questions. This seems an option to get some answers...

I've also had a short email conversation with klaasend that I would like to share in case local LE reads these pages.
Quote
For now I'm just interested in the Lindsey Baum case. Don't know why, but it's on my mind 24/7. Maybe because she looks a bit like my three year old daughter.

The day I subscribe, or tried to, I wanted to post something. Beeing a radio planner for the public safety communications network, I easily spot antenna's (even from above). I know that from so called CDR's (call detailed records), it is possible to see what handheld has been close to a particular base station (even if no call was made). The parking lot between Lindsey's home and the gas station draws my attention. If I would have to walk the route Lindsey should have, I would take the shortest route and would walk trough the gas station and straight trough the parking lot. With the view blocked by trees and bushes in any direction except east, this parking lot seems a perfect place to quickly pull someone into a car and drive of. The gas station seems to have some antennas in a pole right behind the station. So if someone with a handheld has taken Lindsey from the area surrounding the gas station, and was carrying a cellphone he probably was registered at that basestation. As base stations have a limited service area, he would have registered to an other base station as he would travel out of town with Lindsey.

So all cellphones registered at the site that gives coverage to the parking lot, that have moved from there around the time Lindsey went missing, might belong to who took her... Just ask telephone operators to look into this and pass any findings to LE.

Looking at JVK's pictures of the Shell station. I see I've made a mistake. The pole behind the Shell station has transformers in it and no antennas. However the theory is still valid.

Milan.

Great first post Milan! Very interesting.
 Waving hello & welcome to you too!  :smt006


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3 7/28/09 -
Post by: Edward on August 19, 2009, 02:01:38 PM
If somebody suggested that she was put into a water tower.. That would not happen as the water test samples would show it. water companies have to test water all the time..

Septic tanks on the other hand have been used many times over the years..
In a wilderness environment her body would be placed within a hundred yards of a road, like a logging road that is rarely traveled.. Someplace where the culprit could feel safe in parking.
If the ground is soft she could be buried or something put on top of the body like rocks or even tree debris.
.


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3 7/28/09 -
Post by: Edward on August 19, 2009, 03:12:02 PM
I had posted a few months ago an article of a little girl who was abducted and raped and the culprit buried her.. unknowing to him she was alive and unburied herself and stepped out and some others came across her and of course the culprit was arrested..
It happened in northern California or Oregon and or possible Washington no more then 6 months ago..

I can't find that article..

But it would show further Mindset, behavior and habit of culprits that abduct children.



Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3 7/28/09 -
Post by: MonkeyinSC on August 19, 2009, 04:13:27 PM
Quote
I can see an image. I’m seeing it as if I’m looking up at it from a wooded area and the image keeps changing… a tower? A satellite? And then something that sound like Seattle. Those swirly things may be spinning or vibrating??

 are there Washington monkeys that know if windmills are in the area??

A water tower even. The one in Elma is located up at the top of Strawberry Hill in the middle of some woods too. Wonder if the areas have been checked.

I found an old post from Scandi... 7/27/09 in LB thread #2, post #1645:
"I also asked about the Water Tower in McCleary in the SE section of town.  He basically said if anything had been done to breech the water tower they would have known about it as the water pressure would change.  He said they know it was not breeched as nothing has shown up on the guages"(D-OH...sorry, still learning here...I'm not sure how to quote an old post inside of a new post....)

Nice job MonkeyinSC ~ and welcome!  I was going to post that I recalled Scandi being all over this, but you were right on it ~
 :smt006

Thank you for the welcome..!  and... awww shucks  :oops:. Trying not to post too quickly in fear of making a fool of myself in front of all you Expert Monkey Sleuths !


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3 7/28/09 -
Post by: JessStar on August 19, 2009, 04:19:58 PM
I had posted a few months ago an article of a little girl who was abducted and raped and the culprit buried her.. unknowing to him she was alive and unburied herself and stepped out and some others came across her and of course the culprit was arrested..
It happened in northern California or Oregon and or possible Washington no more then 6 months ago..

I can't find that article..

But it would show further Mindset, behavior and habit of culprits that abduct children.



Edward, that was one of the most heartbreaking stories I ever heard.  As I recall, they caught the guy that did it.  The little girl was found by mining men who were scouting a mine.  She was found shivering in the bushes.  They spotted her when they saw the bushes shaking.  If I recall correctly, the perp's car was in the area, and that's how they caught him.  I believe her story is in the Missing/Found Safe forum, or perhaps the Crimes Against Children Forum.  But I know it's here, because I think I'm the one that started the thread.  :-)



Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3 7/28/09 -
Post by: JessStar on August 19, 2009, 04:23:13 PM
I had posted a few months ago an article of a little girl who was abducted and raped and the culprit buried her.. unknowing to him she was alive and unburied herself and stepped out and some others came across her and of course the culprit was arrested..
It happened in northern California or Oregon and or possible Washington no more then 6 months ago..

I can't find that article..

But it would show further Mindset, behavior and habit of culprits that abduct children.



Edward, that was one of the most heartbreaking stories I ever heard.  As I recall, they caught the guy that did it.  The little girl was found by mining men who were scouting a mine.  She was found shivering in the bushes.  They spotted her when they saw the bushes shaking.  If I recall correctly, the perp's car was in the area, and that's how they caught him.  I believe her story is in the Missing/Found Safe forum, or perhaps the Crimes Against Children Forum.  But I know it's here, because I think I'm the one that started the thread.  :-)



Here it is:  http://scaredmonkeys.net/index.php?topic=5095.0

This poor little girl was only 3 years old.          ::MonkeyNoNo::


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3 7/28/09 -
Post by: JessStar on August 19, 2009, 05:06:48 PM
I think people are tired of this crap, and tired of slaps on the wrists.  This makes how many similar stories of late?

KTXL
Suspected Predator Beaten
FOX40 News

25-year old Christopher Guzman was booked into the Sacramento County Jail after allegedly using a social networking site to lure a 14-year-old girl to Garcia Bend Park.

Police say despite telling the young girls family not to get involved, they went to the park to meet Guzman.

Guzman's lawyer Eric Hintz said, "This group, whoever they are took it upon themselves and there was many of them, to drag my client out of the car and beat him badly. They had knives, they had crescent wrenches, they had mace."

The family detained Guzman until police arrived and took him into custody. His bail is set at 200-thousand dollars.

Sgt. Norm Leong of the Sacramento Police Department said, "we never recommend that people take the law into their own hands for this exact reason. Someone could have gotten hurt including the victims."

Guzman's lawyer said he didn't know the young girl's age and has no prior criminal history. He said, "I want to see law enforcement get involved and properly evaluate what, if any, crime has occurred."

Police said they are still interviewing the family involved in the assault to see if there will be any charges filed. Guzman will be in court Wednesday afternoon for his arraignment.

Copyright © 2009, KTXL-TV

http://www.fox40.com/news/headlines/ktxl-tv-suspectedpredatorbeaten,0,3133665.story


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3 7/28/09 -
Post by: Edward on August 19, 2009, 05:39:51 PM
Had the family invited me I would have joined them.. 
She is 14 and he is.. 25 years old 
They are hero's in my book.

The south or the border population has a thing with very young girls.. and young girls like to tease for attention..


Here is a case of an 11 year old girl who leaves a note and takes off with a mexican national..
then an amber alert was issued ..

http://missingexploited.com/2009/01/25/amber-alert-11-year-old-iridian-julissa-rodriguez-missing-in-tyler-tx-since-12409-with-23-year-old-enrique-vasquez-update-found-safe/

then at some point she calls home from mexico and is brought home..
http://www.ksla.com/Global/story.asp?S=9766794


The male has never been found..

It is Machismo behavior.. They Desire young girls.. For various reasons..


If Lindsey was teasing on the internet, one of these idiots could have showd up for her..


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3 7/28/09 -
Post by: Edward on August 19, 2009, 05:52:17 PM
Thanks for posting the link and the article on the 3 year old girl in Yreka..

Here is some updated info on that case..

http://www.dreamindemon.com/2009/03/04/kody-kaplon-helped-himself/

http://www.theweeklyvice.com/2009/03/kody-kaplon-california-man-jailed-after.html


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3 7/28/09 -
Post by: KarmaRoundUp on August 19, 2009, 05:55:47 PM
I'm still curious about the youth group that was meeting and then had their meetings cancelled.  Are they having them now?  Possibly these kids know something.  Just wondering as they seem a little older than Lindsey and her friends.
Yikes,I don't recall a youth group meeting?

snipped from July:
they THINK the services they have stopped are:
Saturday night
Sunday Night
Wednesday Night
AND THE YOUTH GROUP which was on FRIDAY nights

Thank you Sister
Was this group meeting in McCleary or Elma?

You're welcome and good morning.
Northwest Life Center
215 N. 3rd street
Elma, Wa   
There is quite a bit of information about this church in the Weird & Strange thread.  I haven't heard if the pastor Roundtree has come back from Missouri yet.
Thanks Sister.I remember that church now.I wonder if pastor Roundtree is connected to the Round...something restaurant in McCleary......

KarmaR, I don't think so.  It is:
Rounders
202 W Simpson Ave
McCleary, WA 98557

restuarant
Ahh,thanks again.


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3 7/28/09 -
Post by: Scandi on August 19, 2009, 06:11:17 PM
Thanks for posting the link and the article on the 3 year old girl in Yreka..

Here is some updated info on that case..

http://www.dreamindemon.com/2009/03/04/kody-kaplon-helped-himself/

http://www.theweeklyvice.com/2009/03/kody-kaplon-california-man-jailed-after.html


Thanks for that Edward as I had looked for updates and not found any.

Thanks for the message  News Junkie and Haddie.  I am out the door back to work right now but am anxious to see what can be learned to hopefully put the puzzle pieces in place as to what happened to Lindsey.  See you tonight!  xox


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3 7/28/09 -
Post by: MuffyBee on August 19, 2009, 06:15:15 PM
(http://i25.photobucket.com/albums/c100/crazybabyborgs/MOD/modlock5.gif)


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3 7/28/09 -
Post by: mamacrazy30 on August 19, 2009, 09:53:23 PM
(http://i25.photobucket.com/albums/c100/crazybabyborgs/MOD/modlock5.gif)
oh miss Muffy...i wouldn't stay up to wait for it if i were you.... ::MonkeyAngel::


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3 7/28/09 -
Post by: MuffyBee on August 19, 2009, 10:19:27 PM
  I don't think we'll need to stay up for this one, mamacrazy   ::MonkeyWink::


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3 7/28/09 -
Post by: Jademoff on August 20, 2009, 12:01:42 AM
If somebody suggested that she was put into a water tower.. That would not happen as the water test samples would show it. water companies have to test water all the time..

Septic tanks on the other hand have been used many times over the years..
In a wilderness environment her body would be placed within a hundred yards of a road, like a logging road that is rarely traveled.. Someplace where the culprit could feel safe in parking.
If the ground is soft she could be buried or something put on top of the body like rocks or even tree debris.
.

No, I was just focusing on the image the person saw, and coming up with ideas to what the sattelite/towers could be. I'm not even sure where the water tower in McCleary is. I do know that a lot of people who live on the outskirts of town have wells to supply their water.


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3 7/28/09 -
Post by: Tamikosmom on August 20, 2009, 10:56:41 PM
I am amazed they keep saying 4 short blocks.  When I look at the photos, it seems more like 8 blocks to me.  It appears to be quite a distance.  1/2 mile or more. Is there a pictue of the block and houses where she was last seen? (or presumably last seen)

Latest Map: Credit to jvk over yonder:

(http://img377.imageshack.us/img377/3284/newmap04.png)



Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3 7/28/09 -
Post by: Lovinlife on August 20, 2009, 11:27:09 PM
(http://ts1.images.live.com/images/thumbnail.aspx?q=1157213979024&id=f017b0e1b09d6efed80bcc49b5829b9a&url=http%3a%2f%2fwww.findlindseybaum.com%2fmediac%2f450_0%2fmedia%2fLindsey%2420Baum%24202.jpg)

Lindsey Baum ~ Still Missing






I hope you had a nice vacation, Janet!


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3 7/28/09 -
Post by: Tamikosmom on August 20, 2009, 11:28:15 PM
There was a confirmed sighting of Lindsey at 5th and Maple on the evening of June 26, 2009.  Why would Lindsey have backtracked and taken the 6th Street route?

Janet

++++++++


KaraK
Re: Lindsey Baum, 10y missing from McCleary, WA 6/26/09
« Reply #992 on: July 04, 2009, 09:13:38 PM »


When Lindsey left my house she headed down maple street - my daughter watched her until the neighbors trees got in the way that would have been before she hit the corner of 7th and Maple.

http://scaredmonkeys.net/index.php?topic=5541.msg864342;topicseen


ABC News – June 30, 2009

Scott said witnesses were able to put Lindsey within a couple of blocks of her house just after 9:30 p.m. The last person reported to have seen her, he said, was a neighbor on her way to work.

http://abcnews.go.com/US/Story?id=7966924&page=2


The Daily World - July 2, 2009

Scott said a second person came forward Tuesday with a confirmed sighting of Baum from Friday night in the same area along Maple Street near Fifth Street.

http://**/articles/2009/07/02/local_news/doc4a4cf43c1b1dd881132403




Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3 7/28/09 -
Post by: mvdswaluw on August 21, 2009, 02:37:03 AM
If somebody suggested that she was put into a water tower.. That would not happen as the water test samples would show it. water companies have to test water all the time..

Septic tanks on the other hand have been used many times over the years..
In a wilderness environment her body would be placed within a hundred yards of a road, like a logging road that is rarely traveled.. Someplace where the culprit could feel safe in parking.
If the ground is soft she could be buried or something put on top of the body like rocks or even tree debris.
.

No, I was just focusing on the image the person saw, and coming up with ideas to what the sattelite/towers could be. I'm not even sure where the water tower in McCleary is. I do know that a lot of people who live on the outskirts of town have wells to supply their water.

I've also read this. http://psychicsunitetofindmissingchildren.blogspot.com/search?updated-max=2009-08-09T16%3A18%3A00-04%3A00&max-results=7 (http://psychicsunitetofindmissingchildren.blogspot.com/search?updated-max=2009-08-09T16%3A18%3A00-04%3A00&max-results=7)

My attention gets drawn towards Shelton. There is a harbor there, and there is a hotel at Satsop Ave (satellite ?). The next road parallel is Seatlle Ave.
http://maps.google.nl/maps?f=q&source=s_q&hl=nl&q=hotel&sll=47.205473,-123.108201&sspn=0.011444,0.03577&ie=UTF8&radius=0.84&ev=p&ei=RTuOSpvtOZ6EOIOp_bgB&cd=3&usq=hotel&geocode=FYA90AIdxpmp-A&cid=2936993140261271245&li=lmd&t=h&z=16&iwloc=A (http://maps.google.nl/maps?f=q&source=s_q&hl=nl&q=hotel&sll=47.205473,-123.108201&sspn=0.011444,0.03577&ie=UTF8&radius=0.84&ev=p&ei=RTuOSpvtOZ6EOIOp_bgB&cd=3&usq=hotel&geocode=FYA90AIdxpmp-A&cid=2936993140261271245&li=lmd&t=h&z=16&iwloc=A). There is also Super 8 hotel in Shelton.

And the hotel sign described also seems to be there... http://flickr.com/photos/mytravelphotos/3033023461/ (http://flickr.com/photos/mytravelphotos/3033023461/)

 "Wooded area that keeps changing" could point to the mill in the harbor. The tower described could easily be one of the buidlings of the Simpson lumber mill.
http://4.bp.blogspot.com/_ccWJg29QyRw/Sn8rlpJoQdI/AAAAAAAAALg/HGnuZEGyqTM/s1600-h/Lindsey+1.jpg (http://4.bp.blogspot.com/_ccWJg29QyRw/Sn8rlpJoQdI/AAAAAAAAALg/HGnuZEGyqTM/s1600-h/Lindsey+1.jpg)
http://www.panoramio.com/photo/19427302 (http://www.panoramio.com/photo/19427302)

This is only what i've found in 15mins of google maps and google pictures. Pershaps locals can see even more things in common. 


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3 7/28/09 -
Post by: JessStar on August 21, 2009, 08:31:44 AM
I am amazed they keep saying 4 short blocks.  When I look at the photos, it seems more like 8 blocks to me.  It appears to be quite a distance.  1/2 mile or more. Is there a pictue of the block and houses where she was last seen? (or presumably last seen)

Latest Map: Credit to jvk over yonder:

(http://img377.imageshack.us/img377/3284/newmap04.png)


According to Google Maps, that walk is .58 miles. 

Still no sign of Lindsey.  :-( 


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3 7/28/09 -
Post by: Haddie McFaddies Mom on August 21, 2009, 08:42:47 AM
There was a confirmed sighting of Lindsey at 5th and Maple on the evening of June 26, 2009.  Why would Lindsey have backtracked and taken the 6th Street route?

Janet

++++++++


KaraK
Re: Lindsey Baum, 10y missing from McCleary, WA 6/26/09
« Reply #992 on: July 04, 2009, 09:13:38 PM »


When Lindsey left my house she headed down maple street - my daughter watched her until the neighbors trees got in the way that would have been before she hit the corner of 7th and Maple.

http://scaredmonkeys.net/index.php?topic=5541.msg864342;topicseen


ABC News – June 30, 2009

Scott said witnesses were able to put Lindsey within a couple of blocks of her house just after 9:30 p.m. The last person reported to have seen her, he said, was a neighbor on her way to work.

http://abcnews.go.com/US/Story?id=7966924&page=2


The Daily World - July 2, 2009

Scott said a second person came forward Tuesday with a confirmed sighting of Baum from Friday night in the same area along Maple Street near Fifth Street.

http://**/articles/2009/07/02/local_news/doc4a4cf43c1b1dd881132403




I guess if we're going to quote KK regarding her statements about Lindsey's route, we should go all the way back to her first and original statements that were made prior to the one shown here on July 4, 2009 -

on: July 01, 2009, 01:25:22 PM
"For some of the other posters regarding the camera's and Lindsey's route: From a possible witness on the night that Lindsey disappeared she did not take her regular route home. If that is true she would not have had to come through an area where she would have been picked up on those camera's. Instead she would have been headed up 6th street hill into a strictly residential area where there are no businesses which would be consistent with the original trail said to have been picked up by the dogs."

and on:July 01, 2009, 01:58:16 PM
"- The path that Lindsey is said to have taken home that night is not normal - as far as when she is leaving my home and heading to hers but it is a street that she is familiar with and has a friend who lives on that street. So there is a good chance that she was bored and possibly was going to ask to stay the night elsewhere or just felt like walking."


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3 7/28/09 -
Post by: Tamikosmom on August 21, 2009, 10:49:04 AM

Maddie McFaddies Mom

The confirmed sighting of Lindsey on 5th Street was two block further along the Maple Street route from where Michaela Kampen's last sighting of Lindsey on 7th Street.  According to the map ... this would imply that Lindsey would have had to backtrack along Maple Street if she made the decision or was forced to take the 6th Street route when she was just a short distance from her home.

I tend to believe that this little girl made it as far as the Shell Station and ... then something bad happened.  I could be wrong.

Janet


++++++++

THE BIKE

ABC News - June 30, 2009

Baum said she last saw her daughter when Lindsey, along with her 12-year-old brother, Josh, headed out to Lindsey's friend's house in hopes she could get permission to spend the night at the Baum's house.  Baum said her children began squabbling over the use of Josh's bike on the way there and were stopped by a family friend who sent Josh home to end the argument. Lindsey continued on to her friend's house.
 
http://abcnews.go.com/US/story?id=7966924&page=1
 

KARA KAMPEN - IN HER OWN WORDS
 
Kara Kampen:
  The conversation was apparently quite short and consisted of little more then a "Josh you need to go home" Josh trying to explain what was going on and the girls asking the lady to tell Josh to go home again.   

Kara Kampen:  Josh had gotten into so many spats that honestly were in a large part things he did not start but because he was the oldest he was the one who got in trouble. I've set down kids I've never met before to have a talk with them because I heard that they were antagonizing him to see if he'd blow up.

 
The Daily World - July 3, 2009

Kampen said she has replayed that Friday evening in her head over and over. So has her daughter, Michaela, 10, who spent the day swimming with Lindsey. They walked together with Josh Baum, 13, to the Kampen house. But halfway there, Michaela said they teased Josh, getting under his skin ...

http://**/articles/2009/07/03/local_news/doc4a4e415cdb51d302573546.txt




DID JOSH GO HOME AS INSTRUCTED?


Quote from: Northern Rose on July 08, 2009, 03:51:16 PM

Bike was left behind Shell, fight took place on Maple where neighbour sent Josh away.

Where did he go from there? 
Who picked up the bike as it was left at the Shell?
Did he go straight home and was anyone there?
Was he home at 9:15 - 9:30?


KaraK
Re: Lindsey Baum, 10y missing from McCleary, WA 6/26/09
« Reply #1653 on: July 08, 2009, 08:48:14 PM »


1) I can't answer the first one because I was told he went home but was not there myself.
2) The bike stayed at the Shell station. It was not picked up until 2 to 3 days after.
3) Josh's mom was home but again for the same reason as 1 I can not factually say he went straight home.
4) ?



Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3 7/28/09 -
Post by: Tamikosmom on August 21, 2009, 12:37:03 PM
THE SHELL STATION

Was there an employee at the Shell Station between 9:15 PM and 10:00 PM on the evening of Lindsey's disappearance?

Thank you.

Janet


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3 7/28/09 -
Post by: Tamikosmom on August 21, 2009, 01:02:30 PM
Why was Lindsey Baum not concerned that BOTH Josh and Lindsey were not home by the curfew time of 10:00 PM ... only Lindsey?

Could it be that Josh Baum DID conform to the family friend's instructions and ... returned home immediately following the argument he had with his sister?

When the argument is considered why is the topic of Josh Baum a non-issue in the media ... press releases ... forums ....?

Janet

+++++++

Quote from: Tamikosmom on July 05, 2009, 04:03:25 AM

What time did Melissa contact you with her concern that the girls had not returned home?

KaraK
Re: Lindsey Baum, 10y missing from McCleary, WA 6/26/09
« Reply #1085 on: July 05, 2009, 05:39:45 AM »

I believe it was 10:25 when I got the call. I am not sure if she tried previous to that because my battery was drained and charging and I have a majorly cheap phone that works only when it wants to.

http://scaredmonkeys.net/index.php?topic=5541.msg864836;topicseen#msg864836


ABC News - June 30, 2009

Baum said her children began squabbling over the use of Josh's bike on the way there and were stopped by a family friend who sent Josh home to end the argument. Lindsey continued on to her friend's house. When Lindsey's friend found out she couldn't stay the night, Lindsey headed for home around 9:30 p.m.

"When she wasn't home by 10, I started to get nervous," Baum said, adding that 10 p.m. is the curfew for her children.

http://abcnews.go.com/US/story?id=7966924&page=1




Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3 7/28/09 -
Post by: Tamikosmom on August 21, 2009, 01:07:53 PM
Self Edit

Why was Lindsey Baum ... s/b Why was Melissa Baum ...



Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3 7/28/09 -
Post by: Lovinlife on August 21, 2009, 01:24:29 PM
Desparate search for missing girl, Lindsey Baum
McCleary, WA. Lindsey Baum was walking home from a friend's house in the small town of McCleary, Washington on June 26, 2009 when she disappeared. “It's like she literally vanished,” said Melissa Baum, Lindsey's mother.
 
Despite extensive, well coordinated searches by law enforcement, Lindsey is still missing. Lindsey's mother has called on two national non-profit organizations, the KlaasKIDS Foundation and Laura Recovery Center (LRC), to organize a community volunteer search.
 
Brad Dennis, Director of Search Operations for the KlaasKIDS Foundation said they will be holding a community meeting at 7pm Thursday, August 27, 2009 at the McCleary Community Center.  Community members are encouraged to attend and learn about the two organizations and plans for the weekend search. The McCleary Community Center is located at 726 W. Simpson Ave, McCleary, Washington 98577.
 
Individuals who would like to participate in the search for Lindsey should check in at the McCleary Community Center between the hours of 9 am and 4:30 pm on Friday, August 28th. Volunteers must be 18 years of age or older and bring photo identification. “Dress appropriately for the weather, wear long pants and sturdy, covered toe shoes. We need people who can do foot searches as well as individuals who are willing to work in the search center explained Dennis.  Volunteers are not required to attend the community meeting. In addition, we are looking for donations of bottled water, office supplies and the use of a copier.”
 
For more information about the search or information on how you can donate supplies, volunteers can call the LRC toll free number 866-898-5723.
 
The KlaasKIDS Foundation is a non-profit 501(c)(3) organization determined to stop crimes against children and assists families of missing children. Please visit www.klaaskids.org for more information.

http://www.sequimgazette.com/gazettetop/articleDetail.exm/Index/article/2009-08-21_Desparate_search_for_missing_girl__Lindsey_Baum/


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3 7/28/09 -
Post by: Tamikosmom on August 21, 2009, 01:30:07 PM
I am amazed they keep saying 4 short blocks.  When I look at the photos, it seems more like 8 blocks to me.  It appears to be quite a distance.  1/2 mile or more. Is there a pictue of the block and houses where she was last seen? (or presumably last seen)

Latest Map: Credit to jvk over yonder:

(http://img377.imageshack.us/img377/3284/newmap04.png)


According to Google Maps, that walk is .58 miles. 

Still no sign of Lindsey.  :-( 

 ::MonkeyNoNo::

Thanks JessStar.

Janet


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3 7/28/09 -
Post by: Tamikosmom on August 21, 2009, 01:45:23 PM
Desparate search for missing girl, Lindsey Baum
McCleary, WA. Lindsey Baum was walking home from a friend's house in the small town of McCleary, Washington on June 26, 2009 when she disappeared. “It's like she literally vanished,” said Melissa Baum, Lindsey's mother.
 
Despite extensive, well coordinated searches by law enforcement, Lindsey is still missing. Lindsey's mother has called on two national non-profit organizations, the KlaasKIDS Foundation and Laura Recovery Center (LRC), to organize a community volunteer search.
 
Brad Dennis, Director of Search Operations for the KlaasKIDS Foundation said they will be holding a community meeting at 7pm Thursday, August 27, 2009 at the McCleary Community Center.  Community members are encouraged to attend and learn about the two organizations and plans for the weekend search. The McCleary Community Center is located at 726 W. Simpson Ave, McCleary, Washington 98577.
 
Individuals who would like to participate in the search for Lindsey should check in at the McCleary Community Center between the hours of 9 am and 4:30 pm on Friday, August 28th. Volunteers must be 18 years of age or older and bring photo identification. “Dress appropriately for the weather, wear long pants and sturdy, covered toe shoes. We need people who can do foot searches as well as individuals who are willing to work in the search center explained Dennis.  Volunteers are not required to attend the community meeting. In addition, we are looking for donations of bottled water, office supplies and the use of a copier.”
 
For more information about the search or information on how you can donate supplies, volunteers can call the LRC toll free number 866-898-5723.
 
The KlaasKIDS Foundation is a non-profit 501(c)(3) organization determined to stop crimes against children and assists families of missing children. Please visit www.klaaskids.org for more information.

http://www.sequimgazette.com/gazettetop/articleDetail.exm/Index/article/2009-08-21_Desparate_search_for_missing_girl__Lindsey_Baum/

Thanks Lovinlife

This is such good news.

Melissa Baum must be thankful.

Janet

+++++++

The Daily World - August 2, 2009

From the front step of her nearby home, Melissa Baum can almost see its intersection with Fifth Street where her 11-year-old daughter took her last known steps into oblivion.

“I feel like she’s right under my nose and I can’t find her,” she said.

p://**/articles/2009/08/02/local_news/doc4a75285b085b5140001671.txt



Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3 7/28/09 -
Post by: no rose colored glasses on August 21, 2009, 02:31:56 PM
So happy to hear there will be a search, thanks Lovin  ::MonkeyAngel::


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3 7/28/09 -
Post by: Tamikosmom on August 21, 2009, 05:58:39 PM

 ::MonkeyMad::

Victims' Advocates Say Kids at Risk After Massachusetts Ruling on Sex Offenders
Friday, August 21, 2009


A Massachusetts court ruling that sex offenders convicted before 2006 cannot automatically be forced to wear a GPS monitoring device has put every child in the state in danger, a victims' rights group says.

In the 4-3 ruling on Tuesday, the Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court ruled that retroactively forcing sex offenders convicted more than three years ago to wear the tracking devices violates state and federal constitutions.

Debbie Savoia, vice president of Community Voices, a victims' rights group, said the ruling is a "slap in the face" to every sex crime victim in the state and a threat to public safety.

"I'm very angry," she told FOXNews.com. "It's all about the criminal's rights. What about the victims?"

Savoia saw the effects of the state's highest court's ruling Wednesday when she attended a hearing for Ralph Goodwin, who was convicted in 1990 of kidnapping and raping a 7-year-old boy. Goodwin was released on probation earlier this year after the state determined he was no longer dangerous.

Superior Court Judge Kathe Tuttman was asked by prosecutors to require Goodwin to wear a GPS device on his ankle while he lives in Lowell, and Tuttman said she was "legally prohibited" from forcing him to wear the tracking device.

"He's an extremely dangerous man, and the fact that he's not being monitored 24/7 is an issue," Savoia said. "I feel like every kid in Massachusetts is in danger. His crime was absolutely horrible.

"I've spoken to the [boy's] mother, and the pain in that woman is horrific and the fear is he'll do it to another child, and he probably will."

Middlesex District Attorney Gerald Leone Jr., who sought GPS monitoring for Goodwin, was also disappointed by Tuttman's decision.

"GPS monitoring of convicted sex offenders is an important, preventative tool to monitor the whereabouts of defendants who have preyed on victims and demonstrated a likelihood of reoffending," Leone said in a statement. "[Wednesday's] decision does not alter our opinion that it remains within the court's discretion to impose GPS monitoring for this class of criminal offenders, nor will it deter us from continuing to argue for this monitoring for other sexual offenders in the interest of public safety."

Coria Holland, spokeswoman for Probation Commissioner John O'Brien, said "every sex offender case" is currently being reviewed as a result of the court ruling.

Massachusetts currently monitors 82 sex offenders with GPS devices. An additional 221 sex offenders in the state are wanted for violating conditions of their parole. In 2006, the state passed the GPS provision as part of several changes to its Sex Offender Registry Law. Among the changes: homeless sex offenders must register every 45 days, rather than every 90 days, and the most egregious sex offenders are prohibited from living in nursing homes.

Jeannine Mercure, Goodwin's attorney, could not be reached for comment on Thursday. She had objected to the GPS request, arguing that Goodwin receives psychiatric counseling and is visited by a nurse daily to ensure he takes required medications.

Goodwin's neighbors in Lowell told FOXNews.com they were "shocked" by the court's decision.

"If I had children, you bet it would concern me," said one woman who asked not to be identified.

"What this guy did, he's got a serious problem and that doesn't just go away. We have lots of kids in this development."

http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,541580,00.html




Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3 7/28/09 -
Post by: mamacrazy30 on August 21, 2009, 09:59:06 PM
Desparate search for missing girl, Lindsey Baum
McCleary, WA. Lindsey Baum was walking home from a friend's house in the small town of McCleary, Washington on June 26, 2009 when she disappeared. “It's like she literally vanished,” said Melissa Baum, Lindsey's mother.
 
Despite extensive, well coordinated searches by law enforcement, Lindsey is still missing. Lindsey's mother has called on two national non-profit organizations, the KlaasKIDS Foundation and Laura Recovery Center (LRC), to organize a community volunteer search.
 
Brad Dennis, Director of Search Operations for the KlaasKIDS Foundation said they will be holding a community meeting at 7pm Thursday, August 27, 2009 at the McCleary Community Center.  Community members are encouraged to attend and learn about the two organizations and plans for the weekend search. The McCleary Community Center is located at 726 W. Simpson Ave, McCleary, Washington 98577.
 
Individuals who would like to participate in the search for Lindsey should check in at the McCleary Community Center between the hours of 9 am and 4:30 pm on Friday, August 28th. Volunteers must be 18 years of age or older and bring photo identification. “Dress appropriately for the weather, wear long pants and sturdy, covered toe shoes. We need people who can do foot searches as well as individuals who are willing to work in the search center explained Dennis.  Volunteers are not required to attend the community meeting. In addition, we are looking for donations of bottled water, office supplies and the use of a copier.”
 
For more information about the search or information on how you can donate supplies, volunteers can call the LRC toll free number 866-898-5723.
 
The KlaasKIDS Foundation is a non-profit 501(c)(3) organization determined to stop crimes against children and assists families of missing children. Please visit www.klaaskids.org for more information.

http://www.sequimgazette.com/gazettetop/articleDetail.exm/Index/article/2009-08-21_Desparate_search_for_missing_girl__Lindsey_Baum/
thank you.  its about time!


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3 7/28/09 -
Post by: Lovinlife on August 22, 2009, 02:38:24 PM
Now lets see the people of McCleary and surrounding areas step up and go help the search instead of trying to hinder it. ::MonkeyMad::


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3 7/28/09 -
Post by: no rose colored glasses on August 22, 2009, 03:11:26 PM
Now lets see the people of McCleary and surrounding areas step up and go help the search instead of trying to hinder it. ::MonkeyMad::
Lets hope so.


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3 7/28/09 -
Post by: Tamikosmom on August 22, 2009, 06:41:40 PM
The Olympian
Published: 08/22/09  12:00 am   |   Updated: 08/22/09   7:00 am


The KlaasKids Foundation is organizing a search in McCleary for Lindsey Baum, who has been missing for two months.

Lindsey, 11, last was seen in McCleary after 9 p.m. June 26, after she left a friend’s home on Maple Street by herself to walk about a half-mile to her home on Mommsen Road.

Despite a massive search, police have been unable to find Lindsey or say definitively whether she was abducted.

KlaasKids Foundation representatives will hold a community meeting at 7 p.m. Thursday in McCleary at the McCleary Community Center.

The McCleary Community Center is at 726 W. Simpson Ave.

KlaasKids spokeswoman Tricia Griffith said the search will start at 9 a.m. Friday. People who want to help should check in at the McCleary Community Center between 9 a.m. and 4:30 p.m. that day. Volunteers must be 18 or older and must bring photo identification.

Volunteers are advised to dress appropriately for the weather, wear long pants and wear sturdy, closed-toe shoes.

The KlaasKids Foundation was established by Marc Klaas in 1994 to stop crimes against children after the kidnapping and murder of his 12-year-old daughter, Polly Hannah Klaas. She was taken from her home in Petaluma, Calif.

http://www.thenewstribune.com/partners/theolympian/story/853223.html



Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3 7/28/09 -
Post by: Jademoff on August 22, 2009, 09:00:50 PM
The Olympian
Published: 08/22/09  12:00 am   |   Updated: 08/22/09   7:00 am


The KlaasKids Foundation is organizing a search in McCleary for Lindsey Baum, who has been missing for two months.

Lindsey, 11, last was seen in McCleary after 9 p.m. June 26, after she left a friend’s home on Maple Street by herself to walk about a half-mile to her home on Mommsen Road.

Despite a massive search, police have been unable to find Lindsey or say definitively whether she was abducted.

KlaasKids Foundation representatives will hold a community meeting at 7 p.m. Thursday in McCleary at the McCleary Community Center.

The McCleary Community Center is at 726 W. Simpson Ave.

KlaasKids spokeswoman Tricia Griffith said the search will start at 9 a.m. Friday. People who want to help should check in at the McCleary Community Center between 9 a.m. and 4:30 p.m. that day. Volunteers must be 18 or older and must bring photo identification.

Volunteers are advised to dress appropriately for the weather, wear long pants and wear sturdy, closed-toe shoes.

The KlaasKids Foundation was established by Marc Klaas in 1994 to stop crimes against children after the kidnapping and murder of his 12-year-old daughter, Polly Hannah Klaas. She was taken from her home in Petaluma, Calif.

http://www.thenewstribune.com/partners/theolympian/story/853223.html



Thank goodness! I just read that too and was going to post it up myself! Thanks for the updates


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3 7/28/09 -
Post by: mamacrazy30 on August 23, 2009, 02:28:54 PM
Quote
Despite a massive search, police have been unable to find Lindsey or say definitively whether she was abducted.

grrrrr ::MonkeyMad::

(not at you Janet)


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3 7/28/09 -
Post by: no rose colored glasses on August 23, 2009, 03:49:15 PM
Quote
Despite a massive search, police have been unable to find Lindsey or say definitively whether she was abducted.

grrrrr ::MonkeyMad::

(not at you Janet)
If she wasn't abducted, what are they thinking, she ran away?


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3 7/28/09 -
Post by: mamacrazy30 on August 23, 2009, 03:53:15 PM
Quote
Despite a massive search, police have been unable to find Lindsey or say definitively whether she was abducted.

grrrrr ::MonkeyMad::

(not at you Janet)
If she wasn't abducted, what are they thinking, she ran away?
maybe another Robert???  i honestly don't know, and i hate to say this but i wonder if they are thinking at all.   ::MonkeyMad::

where is Lindsey???? ::MonkeyAngel::


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3 7/28/09 -
Post by: Tamikosmom on August 23, 2009, 04:02:28 PM
Quote
Despite a massive search, police have been unable to find Lindsey or say definitively whether she was abducted.

grrrrr ::MonkeyMad::

(not at you Janet)
If she wasn't abducted, what are they thinking, she ran away?

Maybe the speculation is that Lindsey Baum had a chance meeting with her killer  between 5th on Maple ... the last confirmed sighting of the little girl and ... her home?  Could it be that Lindsey's remains will be located in that area covered by debris or foilage?

I do not know.  Just speculating.

Hopefully ... in the process of elimination ... the search next Friday will concentrate on those properties as well as the Shell station.

Janet 


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3 7/28/09 -
Post by: mamacrazy30 on August 23, 2009, 04:12:50 PM
Quote
Despite a massive search, police have been unable to find Lindsey or say definitively whether she was abducted.

grrrrr ::MonkeyMad::

(not at you Janet)
If she wasn't abducted, what are they thinking, she ran away?

Maybe the speculation is that Lindsey Baum had a chance meeting with her killer  between 5th on Maple ... the last confirmed sighting of the little girl and ... her home?  Could it be that Lindsey's remains will be located in that area covered by debris or foilage?

I do not know.  Just speculating.

Hopefully ... in the process of elimination ... the search next Friday will concentrate on those properties as well as the Shell station.

Janet 
i don't know.  there are many things wrong with the whole thing and ??? ::MonkeyConfused::

Lindsey just needs to be brought home ::MonkeyAngel:: ::MonkeyWaa::


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3 7/28/09 -
Post by: Tamikosmom on August 23, 2009, 04:22:18 PM
THE SHELL STATION - THE BIKE

Following the confirmed sighting on 15th and Maple … did Lindsey Baum stop at the Shell Station on her way home to see if her bike had been retrived by her brother following the argument.  Could there have been a chance meeting with Josh?  Were station employees there?

When you consider the argument between Lindsey and Josh ... I cannot comprehend why authorities did not consider the bike as possible evidence.  According to Kara Kampen ... the bike remained at the Shell station for two or three days.  I wonder who picked up the bike ... authorities or ... Josh or Melissa Baum.

Janet

+++++


Quote from: Northern Rose on July 08, 2009, 03:51:16 PM

Bike was left behind Shell, fight took place on Maple where neighbour sent Josh away.

Where did he go from there? 
Who picked up the bike as it was left at the Shell?
Did he go straight home and was anyone there?
Was he home at 9:15 - 9:30?


KaraK
Re: Lindsey Baum, 10y missing from McCleary, WA 6/26/09
« Reply #1653 on: July 08, 2009, 08:48:14 PM »


1) I can't answer the first one because I was told he went home but was not there myself.
2) The bike stayed at the Shell station. It was not picked up until 2 to 3 days after.
3) Josh's mom was home but again for the same reason as 1 I can not factually say he went straight home.
4) ?


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3 7/28/09 -
Post by: no rose colored glasses on August 23, 2009, 04:24:47 PM
Quote
Despite a massive search, police have been unable to find Lindsey or say definitively whether she was abducted.

grrrrr ::MonkeyMad::

(not at you Janet)
If she wasn't abducted, what are they thinking, she ran away?

Maybe the speculation is that Lindsey Baum had a chance meeting with her killer  between 5th on Maple ... the last confirmed sighting of the little girl and ... her home?  Could it be that Lindsey's remains will be located in that area covered by debris or foilage?

I do not know.  Just speculating.

Hopefully ... in the process of elimination ... the search next Friday will concentrate on those properties as well as the Shell station.

Janet 
I don't either, this entire case is so frustrating, and I sure hope they get a lot of searchers. Again, something is just off with all of this  ::MonkeyConfused::  Hope you had a good vacation with your grandchildren at Disneyland.  ::MonkeyCool::


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3 7/28/09 -
Post by: Tamikosmom on August 23, 2009, 04:28:24 PM
Quote
Despite a massive search, police have been unable to find Lindsey or say definitively whether she was abducted.

grrrrr ::MonkeyMad::

(not at you Janet)
If she wasn't abducted, what are they thinking, she ran away?


Expert: Missing girl likely went with someone she knew
09:58 PM PDT on Wednesday, July 1, 2009


A national expert helping in the search for 10-year-old Lindsey Baum says someone Lindsey knew might be responsible for her disappearance. Baum vanished while walking home from a friend’s house Friday around 9 p.m.

""Based on the information I have, it’s someone she possibly knows or is in the area, not outside the area," said Henry Schmidt, with the National Center for Missing and Exploited Children..

Schmidt, a retired sheriff from Wyoming, arrived in McCleary to assist with the search Sunday.

http://www.nwcn.com/statenews/washington/stories/NW_070109WAB-mccleary-KS.260ea8b9.html


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3 7/28/09 -
Post by: Tamikosmom on August 23, 2009, 04:32:34 PM
Quote
Despite a massive search, police have been unable to find Lindsey or say definitively whether she was abducted.

grrrrr ::MonkeyMad::

(not at you Janet)
If she wasn't abducted, what are they thinking, she ran away?

Maybe the speculation is that Lindsey Baum had a chance meeting with her killer  between 5th on Maple ... the last confirmed sighting of the little girl and ... her home?  Could it be that Lindsey's remains will be located in that area covered by debris or foilage?

I do not know.  Just speculating.

Hopefully ... in the process of elimination ... the search next Friday will concentrate on those properties as well as the Shell station.

Janet 
I don't either, this entire case is so frustrating, and I sure hope they get a lot of searchers. Again, something is just off with all of this  ::MonkeyConfused::  Hope you had a good vacation with your grandchildren at Disneyland.  ::MonkeyCool::

We all have a great time at the Magic Kingdom and lots of memories were created.  However ... it was also good to get home.  I must be getting old.

 ::MonkeyHaHa::

Janet


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3 7/28/09 -
Post by: no rose colored glasses on August 23, 2009, 04:34:58 PM
I always like getting home too  ::MonkeyCool:: 


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3 7/28/09 -
Post by: mamacrazy30 on August 23, 2009, 04:44:54 PM
Quote
Despite a massive search, police have been unable to find Lindsey or say definitively whether she was abducted.

grrrrr ::MonkeyMad::

(not at you Janet)
If she wasn't abducted, what are they thinking, she ran away?


Expert: Missing girl likely went with someone she knew
09:58 PM PDT on Wednesday, July 1, 2009


A national expert helping in the search for 10-year-old Lindsey Baum says someone Lindsey knew might be responsible for her disappearance. Baum vanished while walking home from a friend’s house Friday around 9 p.m.

""Based on the information I have, it’s someone she possibly knows or is in the area, not outside the area," said Henry Schmidt, with the National Center for Missing and Exploited Children..

Schmidt, a retired sheriff from Wyoming, arrived in McCleary to assist with the search Sunday.

http://www.nwcn.com/statenews/washington/stories/NW_070109WAB-mccleary-KS.260ea8b9.html
so are they saying she left on her own will?  even if she did that is not her choice to make and very irresponsible of whomever 'helped' her.  and even if she did know the person that doesn't mean they didn't do anything bad to her.  even if she got in a car with someone she knew she is still missing.  i'm not venting at you (Janet)  i just really don't understand.
1) she left on her own (she didn't do it by herself she's 11)
2) she left with someone in a car (did know them) they are still kidnappers
3) she left with someone in a car (didn't know them) they are kidnappers

so she's hiding in someones house?  her body is hidden in someones house? 

i don't understand ::MonkeyWaa::


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3 7/28/09 -
Post by: KarmaRoundUp on August 23, 2009, 06:37:42 PM
Welcome back Janet
Happy to hear you had a good time.
 ::MonkeyCheer3::


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3 7/28/09 -
Post by: KarmaRoundUp on August 23, 2009, 06:40:00 PM
Quote
Despite a massive search, police have been unable to find Lindsey or say definitively whether she was abducted.

grrrrr ::MonkeyMad::

(not at you Janet)
If she wasn't abducted, what are they thinking, she ran away?


Expert: Missing girl likely went with someone she knew
09:58 PM PDT on Wednesday, July 1, 2009


A national expert helping in the search for 10-year-old Lindsey Baum says someone Lindsey knew might be responsible for her disappearance. Baum vanished while walking home from a friend’s house Friday around 9 p.m.

""Based on the information I have, it’s someone she possibly knows or is in the area, not outside the area," said Henry Schmidt, with the National Center for Missing and Exploited Children..

Schmidt, a retired sheriff from Wyoming, arrived in McCleary to assist with the search Sunday.

http://www.nwcn.com/statenews/washington/stories/NW_070109WAB-mccleary-KS.260ea8b9.html
so are they saying she left on her own will?  even if she did that is not her choice to make and very irresponsible of whomever 'helped' her.  and even if she did know the person that doesn't mean they didn't do anything bad to her.  even if she got in a car with someone she knew she is still missing.  i'm not venting at you (Janet)  i just really don't understand.
1) she left on her own (she didn't do it by herself she's 11)
2) she left with someone in a car (did know them) they are still kidnappers
3) she left with someone in a car (didn't know them) they are kidnappers

so she's hiding in someones house?  her body is hidden in someones house? 

i don't understand ::MonkeyWaa::
MamaC,I think they are just guessing at what could have happened as they don't know what happened at this time.They will now be searching for Lindsey's body.     ::MonkeyWaa::


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3 7/28/09 -
Post by: Tamikosmom on August 23, 2009, 06:56:51 PM
Welcome back Janet
Happy to hear you had a good time.
 ::MonkeyCheer3::

Thanks Karma.

  ::MonkeyAngel::

It really is "a small world after all".  I met up with a former co-worker in line for one of the rides ... a former co-worker I have not spoken to in almost a year.  Procrastination is a very bad thing.  Anyways ... she returned from her California/Oregon Coast trip on Friday and ... we met for lunch yesterday and ... caught up on the events in our lives over the past year.  Her life has been so much more exciting than mine.

 ::MonkeyWaa::

I may break that cycle and bungie jump along with my nephew when I take a trip over to Vancouver Island next week.

 ::MonkeyShocked::

Then again I may not.

 ::MonkeyHaHa::

I hope Monkeys all had a good day.

Janet


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3 7/28/09 -
Post by: Tamikosmom on August 23, 2009, 07:00:44 PM
My prayers will be upholding the search effort next Friday.  If God deems that the timing is right ... answers will be forthcoming regarding the disappearance of this precious little girl.

Janet
 


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3 7/28/09 -
Post by: KarmaRoundUp on August 23, 2009, 07:04:55 PM
Welcome back Janet
Happy to hear you had a good time.
 ::MonkeyCheer3::

Thanks Karma.

  ::MonkeyAngel::

It really is "a small world after all".  I met up with a former co-worker in line for one of the rides ... a former co-worker I have not spoken to in almost a year.  Procrastination is a very bad thing.  Anyways ... she returned from her California/Oregon Coast trip on Friday and ... we met for lunch yesterday and ... caught up on the events in our lives over the past year.  Her life has been so much more exciting than mine.

 ::MonkeyWaa::

I may break that cycle and bungie jump along with my nephew when I take a trip over to Vancouver Island next week.

 ::MonkeyShocked::

Then again I may not.

 ::MonkeyHaHa::

I hope Monkeys all had a good day.

Janet
lol...yikes on the bungie jumping.    ::cartwheel::


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3 7/28/09 -
Post by: KarmaRoundUp on August 23, 2009, 07:06:08 PM
My prayers will be upholding the search effort next Friday.  If God deems that the timing is right ... answers will be forthcoming regarding the disappearance of this precious little girl.

Janet
 
Amen
I'm praying and hoping for a huge turnout of people looking for Lindsey and I'm praying they find her.
 ::MonkeyAngel::


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3 7/28/09 -
Post by: mamacrazy30 on August 23, 2009, 07:55:27 PM
My prayers will be upholding the search effort next Friday.  If God deems that the timing is right ... answers will be forthcoming regarding the disappearance of this precious little girl.

Janet
 
Amen
I'm praying and hoping for a huge turnout of people looking for Lindsey and I'm praying they find her.
 ::MonkeyAngel::
::MonkeyAngel::


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3 7/28/09 -
Post by: Sister on August 23, 2009, 08:29:34 PM
My prayers will be upholding the search effort next Friday.  If God deems that the timing is right ... answers will be forthcoming regarding the disappearance of this precious little girl.
Janet

I have chosen to skip over your comments as we are not in agreement on most things.  But this statement is ludicrous . . . because what you are saying is that for all the missing children, missing adults, unsolved murders, unsolved rapes and other crimes, etc.(the hundreds found on this board alone) -- the reason the answers are not forthcoming is because the timing isn't right.  What kind of God is that?
Never mind, please don't answer me at all. 
Just wanted others reading to know that is not the God I know, love, and serve.


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3 7/28/09 -
Post by: Tamikosmom on August 23, 2009, 08:35:32 PM

Maddie McFaddies Mom

The confirmed sighting of Lindsey on 5th Street was two block further along the Maple Street route from where Michaela Kampen's last sighting of Lindsey on 7th Street.  According to the map ... this would imply that Lindsey would have had to backtrack along Maple Street if she made the decision or was forced to take the 6th Street route when she was just a short distance from her home.

I tend to believe that this little girl made it as far as the Shell Station and ... then something bad happened.  I could be wrong.

Janet


++++++++

THE BIKE

ABC News - June 30, 2009

Baum said she last saw her daughter when Lindsey, along with her 12-year-old brother, Josh, headed out to Lindsey's friend's house in hopes she could get permission to spend the night at the Baum's house.  Baum said her children began squabbling over the use of Josh's bike on the way there and were stopped by a family friend who sent Josh home to end the argument. Lindsey continued on to her friend's house.
 
http://abcnews.go.com/US/story?id=7966924&page=1
 

KARA KAMPEN - IN HER OWN WORDS
 
Kara Kampen:
  The conversation was apparently quite short and consisted of little more then a "Josh you need to go home" Josh trying to explain what was going on and the girls asking the lady to tell Josh to go home again.   

Kara Kampen:  Josh had gotten into so many spats that honestly were in a large part things he did not start but because he was the oldest he was the one who got in trouble. I've set down kids I've never met before to have a talk with them because I heard that they were antagonizing him to see if he'd blow up.

 
The Daily World - July 3, 2009

Kampen said she has replayed that Friday evening in her head over and over. So has her daughter, Michaela, 10, who spent the day swimming with Lindsey. They walked together with Josh Baum, 13, to the Kampen house. But halfway there, Michaela said they teased Josh, getting under his skin ...

http://**/articles/2009/07/03/local_news/doc4a4e415cdb51d302573546.txt




DID JOSH GO HOME AS INSTRUCTED?


Quote from: Northern Rose on July 08, 2009, 03:51:16 PM

Bike was left behind Shell, fight took place on Maple where neighbour sent Josh away.

Where did he go from there? 
Who picked up the bike as it was left at the Shell?
Did he go straight home and was anyone there?
Was he home at 9:15 - 9:30?


KaraK
Re: Lindsey Baum, 10y missing from McCleary, WA 6/26/09
« Reply #1653 on: July 08, 2009, 08:48:14 PM »


1) I can't answer the first one because I was told he went home but was not there myself.
2) The bike stayed at the Shell station. It was not picked up until 2 to 3 days after.
3) Josh's mom was home but again for the same reason as 1 I can not factually say he went straight home.
4) ?


Also ... Undersheriff Rick Scott was quoted in the media as claiming that tracking dogs never picked up Lindsey Baum's scent.

Janet

+++++


KOMO News - June 28, 2009

A wide-ranging search was launched early Saturday in the town and the surrounding forests. The town was criss-crossed three times, but not a trace of Lindsey has been found. Even bloodhounds failed to pick up her scent.

http://www.komonews.com/news/local/49383897.html


The Daily World - July 2, 2009

Scott said authorities have run into several dead ends with almost no signs of the 4-foot-9, brown-haired girl, who was last spotted wearing a blue pullover shirt and blue jeans.

“I don’t know anything more than I knew Saturday afternoon,” he said, “but I’m not willing to admit that I know anything less.”

Scott said bloodhounds traced the route Lindsey took early on from the friend’s house to her own home, but didn’t find any scent. And in places where Lindsey once played — parks and by the creek — Lindsey’s scent has been vanishing.

The loss of scent could be a combination of factors — the heat on the sidewalk could have dissipated it for instance, he said.

http://**/articles/2009/07/02/local_news/doc4a4cf43c1b1dd881132403.txt


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3 7/28/09 -
Post by: mamacrazy30 on August 23, 2009, 08:53:28 PM
My prayers will be upholding the search effort next Friday.  If God deems that the timing is right ... answers will be forthcoming regarding the disappearance of this precious little girl.
Janet

I have chosen to skip over your comments as we are not in agreement on most things.  But this statement is ludicrous . . . because what you are saying is that for all the missing children, missing adults, unsolved murders, unsolved rapes and other crimes, etc.(the hundreds found on this board alone) -- the reason the answers are not forthcoming is because the timing isn't right.  What kind of God is that?
Never mind, please don't answer me at all. 
Just wanted others reading to know that is not the God I know, love, and serve.
sister....
iirc it was an adm. or mod. that coined the phrase that the missing will be found/get justice on Gods time, not ours.  please.... ::MonkeyAngel::


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3 7/28/09 -
Post by: Tamikosmom on August 23, 2009, 10:11:43 PM
[
If next Friday's search for this precious little girl ... a search which I will uphold in prayer ... does not reveal the answers my heart desires ... I will be disappointed.  However ... when all is said and done I will stand on the promise of my Heavenly Father ... that answers will be forthcoming in His perfect timing.  Something akin to a relationship that a young child has with his Earthly father ... a relationship built on love ... a relationship built on faith ... a relationship built on trust.

Janet

+++++++


Isaiah 40:31 NKJV
But those who wait on the LORD
Shall renew their strength;
They shall mount up with wings like eagles,
They shall run and not be weary,
They shall walk and not faint.

Galatians 6:9
Let us not become weary in doing good, for at the proper time we will reap a harvest if we do not give up.

Isaiah 55:8-9
My thoughts are not your thoughts, nor are your ways My ways,' says the Lord.
'For as the heavens are higher than the earth, so are My ways higher than your ways,
And My thoughts than your thoughts.

Philippians 4:6-7
Do not be anxious about anything, but in everything, by prayer and petition, with thanksgiving, present your requests to God. And the peace of God, which passes all understanding, will guard your hearts and your minds in Christ Jesus.

Romans 8:28
And we know that in all things God works for the good of those who love him, who have been called according to his purpose





Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3 7/28/09 -
Post by: Sister on August 23, 2009, 10:12:16 PM
My prayers will be upholding the search effort next Friday.  If God deems that the timing is right ... answers will be forthcoming regarding the disappearance of this precious little girl.
Janet

I have chosen to skip over your comments as we are not in agreement on most things.  But this statement is ludicrous . . . because what you are saying is that for all the missing children, missing adults, unsolved murders, unsolved rapes and other crimes, etc.(the hundreds found on this board alone) -- the reason the answers are not forthcoming is because the timing isn't right.  What kind of God is that?
Never mind, please don't answer me at all. 
Just wanted others reading to know that is not the God I know, love, and serve.
sister....
iirc it was an adm. or mod. that coined the phrase that the missing will be found/get justice on Gods time, not ours.  please.... ::MonkeyAngel::

All prayers are needed to bring Lindsey home.  My apologies to all.


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3 7/28/09 -
Post by: JessStar on August 23, 2009, 10:29:45 PM
I spoke with the woman from Laura Recovery Center on Friday. She's afraid that people in the area are "starting to forget."  Donations are slow coming in, as are volunteer sign ups. Please, if you are from the McCleary area, do everything you can to publicize this search and mobilize people. I live over 3000 miles away, so I can only do what's feasible from that distance.
;-)

Prayers for Lindsey, may the Lord shine His light on you little girl.



Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3 7/28/09 -
Post by: Tamikosmom on August 23, 2009, 10:48:22 PM
I spoke with the woman from Laura Recovery Center on Friday. She's afraid that people in the area are "starting to forget."  Donations are slow coming in, as are volunteer sign ups. Please, if you are from the McCleary area, do everything you can to publicize this search and mobilize people. I live over 3000 miles away, so I can only do what's feasible from that distance.
;-)

Prayers for Lindsey, may the Lord shine His light on you little girl.



Thank you JessStar.

 ::MonkeyAngel::

Janet


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3 7/28/09 -
Post by: crazybabyborg on August 23, 2009, 11:42:55 PM
I spoke with the woman from Laura Recovery Center on Friday. She's afraid that people in the area are "starting to forget."  Donations are slow coming in, as are volunteer sign ups. Please, if you are from the McCleary area, do everything you can to publicize this search and mobilize people. I live over 3000 miles away, so I can only do what's feasible from that distance.
;-)

Prayers for Lindsey, may the Lord shine His light on you little girl.



It looks like we need a miracle here. My prayers join you all in hopes that Lindsey will be found. 


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3 7/28/09 -
Post by: KarmaRoundUp on August 24, 2009, 06:35:48 PM
New: Lindsey Baum blog

Letter to Lindsey from Mommy     ::MonkeyWaa:: ::MonkeyWaa::


http://findlindseybaum.blogspot.com/search?updated-min=2009-01-01T00%3A00%3A00-08%3A00&updated-max=2010-01-01T00%3A00%3A00-08%3A00&max-results=8



Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3 7/28/09 -
Post by: no rose colored glasses on August 24, 2009, 06:39:41 PM
New: Lindsey Baum blog

Letter to Lindsey from Mommy     ::MonkeyWaa:: ::MonkeyWaa::


http://findlindseybaum.blogspot.com/search?updated-min=2009-01-01T00%3A00%3A00-08%3A00&updated-max=2010-01-01T00%3A00%3A00-08%3A00&max-results=8


How sad, it just seems like this is cold, hopefully something will happen soon. She just couldn't have disappeared into thin air so close to her home. I still believe someone saw something.


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3 7/28/09 -
Post by: KarmaRoundUp on August 24, 2009, 07:03:16 PM
New: Lindsey Baum blog

Letter to Lindsey from Mommy     ::MonkeyWaa:: ::MonkeyWaa::


http://findlindseybaum.blogspot.com/search?updated-min=2009-01-01T00%3A00%3A00-08%3A00&updated-max=2010-01-01T00%3A00%3A00-08%3A00&max-results=8


How sad, it just seems like this is cold, hopefully something will happen soon. She just couldn't have disappeared into thin air so close to her home. I still believe someone saw something.
I agree and I'm hoping and praying that something/anything comes out of this coming weekends search.


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3 7/28/09 -
Post by: mamacrazy30 on August 25, 2009, 10:37:37 PM
still thinking about you Lindsey and wonder where you are ::MonkeyAngel::


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3 7/28/09 -
Post by: KarmaRoundUp on August 26, 2009, 09:57:13 AM
MikeB from WS took a lot more great images from his fly overs of McCleary.
MikeB put the images on Flickr and asks that anyone viewing his images please:
Click on small image then click on the map link and images will show up on the map.MikeB asks that anyone having time to please look very closely at the images with water for anything(or a body)that could have gotten snagged on something in the waters.


http://www.flickr.com/photos/7814456@N08/sets/72157622145620046/




Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3 7/28/09 -
Post by: KarmaRoundUp on August 26, 2009, 10:10:15 AM
New~Lindsey Baum~Missing Child  MySpace

Has quite a few new pictures of Lindsey


http://profile.myspace.com/493197730

http://viewmorepics.myspace.com/index.cfm?fuseaction=user.viewAlbums&friendID=493197730



Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3 7/28/09 -
Post by: Tamikosmom on August 26, 2009, 02:07:07 PM
I cannot comprehend why LE is not prepared to underwrite the costs associated with office space and related office supplies in regards to the upcoming search for Lindsey Baum.

A little girl is missing and ... the silence from LE does not make sense!

IMO

Janet

+++++


National group organizing effort for Lindsey Baum
Friday, August 21, 2009 12:12 PM PDT

The Daily World


National missing child assistance organizations plan to host a community meeting and coordinate new search efforts next week for 11-year-old Lindsey Baum, who disappeared from McCleary in late June.

The KlaasKIDS Foundation and the Laura Recovery Center plan to hold a community meeting at 7 p.m. Aug. 27, at the McCleary Community Center on Simpson Avenue to launch the new effort.

Weekend search

The meeting will address resources available through the organizations and plans for a new search of the McCleary area over the weekend.

A KlaasKIDS news release said all search volunteers must be at least 18 years old with photo identification. Volunteers for the weekend search should dress for the weather, including long pants and sturdy shoes.

Baum disappeared on June 26 while walking a short distance home from her friend’s house late in the evening. The 4-foot-9, brown-haired girl was wearing a light blue hooded shirt and jeans at the time.

Despite a massive search from multiple law enforcement agencies, investigators have found no evidence explaining her disappearance.

The organizations stated they hope local businesses or families can donate bottled water, office supplies or copying facilities. For information on making donations, call the Laura Recovery Center at 1-866-898-5723.

Law enforcement officials are asking anyone who might have any information about the whereabouts of Lindsey Baum to come forward with tips. Tips can be made by phone at 1-866-915-8299 or via e-mail at soadmin@co.grays-harbor.wa.us.

http://**/article...f965630864.txt


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3 7/28/09 -
Post by: no rose colored glasses on August 26, 2009, 02:18:27 PM
Thanks Karma  ::MonkeyCool::


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3 7/28/09 -
Post by: Nut44x4 on August 26, 2009, 04:17:32 PM
(http://i25.photobucket.com/albums/c100/crazybabyborgs/MOD/modlock5.gif)
BUMP


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3 7/28/09 -
Post by: sherip on August 26, 2009, 04:19:04 PM
Another one missing...........................


Aberdeen Police are seeking help in tracking down a woman reported missing Monday afternoon, according to the Associated Press and KXRO-AM, and www.kxro.com.

Connie Jean Forbis (also known as Connie Jean Kelly) was last seen at 9:30 a.m. Monday heading towards the Aberdeen Library from her home on the 1500 block on Aberdeen Avenue.

According to the report, Forbis is described as a 39-year-old white female, 5 foot 3 inches, with a stocky build, long dark blond hair, blue eyes and was last seen wearing a blue cap, denim coat and blue jeans.

Anyone with information is asked to call Aberdeen Detectives Bret Ellis or Art Laur at 360 533 3180 or the Aberdeen Tip Line at 360 538-4450.







Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3 7/28/09 -
Post by: Lovinlife on August 26, 2009, 05:43:17 PM
(http://www.king5.com/images/slideshow/lindseybaum/images/baum1.JPG)

Lindsey Baum ~ Still Missing

Where are you, Lindsey?!


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3 7/28/09 -
Post by: KarmaRoundUp on August 26, 2009, 06:04:54 PM
Another one missing...........................


Aberdeen Police are seeking help in tracking down a woman reported missing Monday afternoon, according to the Associated Press and KXRO-AM, and www.kxro.com.

Connie Jean Forbis (also known as Connie Jean Kelly) was last seen at 9:30 a.m. Monday heading towards the Aberdeen Library from her home on the 1500 block on Aberdeen Avenue.

According to the report, Forbis is described as a 39-year-old white female, 5 foot 3 inches, with a stocky build, long dark blond hair, blue eyes and was last seen wearing a blue cap, denim coat and blue jeans.

Anyone with information is asked to call Aberdeen Detectives Bret Ellis or Art Laur at 360 533 3180 or the Aberdeen Tip Line at 360 538-4450.






Hmmmmm,Aberdeen is real cloase to McCleary right?I also read where the Aberdeen Fair left town 2 weeks early because of weather and vendors commitment elsewhere.Fairs and Carnivals and such bring quite a few people with them from all over.


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3 7/28/09 -
Post by: KarmaRoundUp on August 26, 2009, 06:06:51 PM
New Lindsey images





Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3 7/28/09 -
Post by: KarmaRoundUp on August 26, 2009, 06:13:20 PM
Younger Lindsey





Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3 7/28/09 -
Post by: KarmaRoundUp on August 26, 2009, 06:14:28 PM
Lindsey and Daddy



Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3 7/28/09 -
Post by: KarmaRoundUp on August 26, 2009, 06:15:36 PM
Lindsey and bear



Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3 7/28/09 -
Post by: KarmaRoundUp on August 26, 2009, 06:16:50 PM
Lindsey dressup




Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3 7/28/09 -
Post by: KarmaRoundUp on August 26, 2009, 06:18:08 PM
Little Lindsey




Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3 7/28/09 -
Post by: KarmaRoundUp on August 26, 2009, 06:20:22 PM
Sleeping Lindsey(I'm trying to help and get us to a new thread.I think it would be great if we got to a new thread by friday morning,in time for the new search effort for sweet Lindsey)



Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3 7/28/09 -
Post by: KarmaRoundUp on August 26, 2009, 06:23:23 PM
Beautiful........





Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3 7/28/09 -
Post by: KarmaRoundUp on August 26, 2009, 06:25:00 PM
Playful Lindsey





Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3 7/28/09 -
Post by: KarmaRoundUp on August 26, 2009, 06:26:25 PM
Love this one.....



 ::MonkeyAngel::



Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3 7/28/09 -
Post by: Nut44x4 on August 26, 2009, 06:40:35 PM
me2 I put it on the first page of next thread#4


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3 7/28/09 -
Post by: Nut44x4 on August 26, 2009, 06:45:11 PM
if we ever get there lol


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3 7/28/09 -
Post by: KarmaRoundUp on August 26, 2009, 06:48:52 PM
if we ever get there lol
LOL....I was just thinking that.


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3 7/28/09 -
Post by: KarmaRoundUp on August 26, 2009, 06:57:37 PM
Search Center Underway for Missing 11 yr old Lindsey Baum
 
Desperate search for missing girl, Lindsey Baum

McCleary, WA. Lindsey Baum was walking home from a friend's house in the small town of McCleary, Washington on June 26, 2009 when she disappeared. “It's like she literally vanished,” said Melissa Baum, Lindsey's mother. Despite extensive, well coordinated searches by law enforcement, Lindsey is still missing. Lindsey's mother has called on two national non-profit organizations, the KlaasKIDS Foundation and Laura Recovery Center (LRC), to organize a community volunteer search.

Brad Dennis, Director of Search Operations for the KlaasKIDS Foundation said they will be holding a community meeting at 7pm Thursday, August 27, 2009 at the McCleary Community Center. Community members are encouraged to attend and learn about the two organizations and plans for the weekend search. The McCleary Community Center is located at 726 W. Simpson Ave, McCleary, Washington 98577.

Continue Reading the Press Release

They are holding a community meeting Thursday~8/27/09 7PM
Searches will be Friday,Saturday and Sunday so far.I sure hope our locals here at SM's attend the searches or help out at the search center.They also need donations of water and food.
 
http://findlindseybaum.blogspot.com/2009/08/search-center-underway-for-missing-11.html





Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3 7/28/09 -
Post by: KarmaRoundUp on August 26, 2009, 06:59:28 PM
Light A Candle For Lindsey Baum
 
Below you will find a link that will allow you to light a virtual candle for Missing 11 year old Lindsey Baum. Please take a moment to light one and book mark the page as each candle only stays lit for 48hrs. You can take a moment when lighting a candle to reflect on what lighting your candle means to you or push forth your thoughts for a quick and safe return home.

Thank you each and everyone for the support for both Lindsey Baum and her family.

Light A Candle Here
http://findlindseybaum.blogspot.com/2009/08/light-candle-for-lindsey-baum.html


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3 7/28/09 -
Post by: KarmaRoundUp on August 26, 2009, 07:01:04 PM
Lindsey Baum Video and Song
 
Lindsey Baum Missing 10 Yr Old


http://findlindseybaum.blogspot.com/2009/08/lindsey-baum-video-and-song.html



Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3 7/28/09 -
Post by: KarmaRoundUp on August 26, 2009, 07:11:55 PM
the Laura Recovery Center based out of Texas will be heading into McCleary, WA and taking steps to get a search center up and running. This type of
Lindsey Baum Search Center Sets Up in McCleary
Neighborhood: Community Center
McCleary, WA 98557
United States of America service is not new to the Laura Recovery Center so it is no surprise that the plans have already been made and the start up details worked out.

The building has been chosen and so the new search center location will be The McCleary Community Center located just on the outskirts of downtown at 726 West Simpson Avenue. The search center will take a few days to get set up, most likely, since they need to get an idea of how many volunteers they will be able to pull in for weekend searches and to get everything organized and ready to go. In the mean time they will be holding a public meeting (see below) and looking for individuals willing and able to donate some of their time to help search as well as individuals who can offer help inside the search center.

Volunteers - If you are interested in volunteering please stop in at the Community Center between 9am and 4:30pm Friday August 28th or you call LRC toll free at 1-866-898-5723 or visit the site FindLindseyBaum.com and submit a contact form with the subject line "volunteer" and your contact information and you will be notified when searches are scheduled to start. If you have already emailed in previously during the original attempt to secure a search center building then you can expect an email in the next week, if you do not get it please resend your email including name and contact information: phone number and/or email. Volunteers must be at least 18 years old and have a photo I.D. Searches will start that Friday!!
http://www.associatedcontent.com/article/2093773/lindsey_baum_search_center_sets_up.html?cat=8



Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3 7/28/09 -
Post by: KarmaRoundUp on August 26, 2009, 07:15:09 PM
Patriotic Lindsey  :)   
 ::MonkeyKiss::



Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3 7/28/09 -
Post by: MuffyBee on August 26, 2009, 07:17:30 PM
Great pictures of Lindsey.  Thank you all   ::MonkeyAngel::


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3 7/28/09 -
Post by: KarmaRoundUp on August 26, 2009, 07:20:17 PM
Lindsey with Brother




Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3 7/28/09 -
Post by: KarmaRoundUp on August 26, 2009, 07:21:37 PM
Great pictures of Lindsey.  Thank you all   ::MonkeyAngel::
Thank you for letting me post them all :)
Should I also put them on the photo link?I did put a link to them on there.


Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3 7/28/09 -
Post by: KarmaRoundUp on August 26, 2009, 07:22:56 PM
Look at those sweet cheeks!

 ::MonkeyAngel::




Title: Re: Lindsey Baum #3 7/28/09 - 8/26/09
Post by: Nut44x4 on August 26, 2009, 07:42:14 PM
(http://i34.photobucket.com/albums/d118/Sanddrops/Scared%20Monkeys/LOCKED2.gif)

# 4

http://scaredmonkeys.net/index.php?topic=5810.0

I AM LOCKING THIS EARLY...... so peeps don't have to wait all night for it to happen.