Scared Monkeys Discussion Forum

Natalee Holloway => LCD Archive => Topic started by: klaasend on November 27, 2006, 12:01:10 PM



Title: Lively Case Discussion #549 11/27 - 11/28/2006
Post by: klaasend on November 27, 2006, 12:01:10 PM
You all know the rules

(http://i37.photobucket.com/albums/e82/klaasend2/InHonorofNatalee.jpg)


Title: Lively Case Discussion #549 11/27 - 11/28/2006
Post by: Tylergal on November 27, 2006, 01:22:10 PM
Cbb, I responded and it accepted, but is not there, that I think I would have loved your mom based on what you wrote.  Corker?  Smart lady, that corker.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #549 11/27 - 11/28/2006
Post by: klaasend on November 27, 2006, 01:22:12 PM
Working on a project at the moment, so if I don't respond right away that's why  :wink:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #549 11/27 - 11/28/2006
Post by: crazybabyborg on November 27, 2006, 01:44:33 PM
Quote from: "Tylergal"
Cbb, I responded and it accepted, but is not there, that I think I would have loved your mom based on what you wrote.  Corker?  Smart lady, that corker.


Thx, Tyler. She was Queen of the "One Line Wisdom Givers". I've come to realize she kept it short and sweet so I'd remember what she said!  :lol:

I'll always remember as a seven year old trying to explain why I had gotten my Easter dress muddy and torn; "But Mom, it's only natural to be in a hurry to find what the Easter Bunny hid for me, and not change clothes first!" Her reply? " Young Lady, Nature is what we were put here to rise above!"

Boy, did that one ring in my ears in a LOT of circumstances as I grew up!


Title: Lively Case Discussion #549 11/27 - 11/28/2006
Post by: Tylergal on November 27, 2006, 01:46:55 PM
Your mother sounds so wise, CBB.  My grandmother was a lot like that.  Some of her best were related to premarital sex but I will not post them here as I tend to be going off on a tangent this morning.  I think I would have loved your mother.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #549 11/27 - 11/28/2006
Post by: Tylergal on November 27, 2006, 01:47:50 PM
Can we bring the post of the wife being questioned in the assault to this page or can we post it on the Anna & Mrs. Marples' thread.  This is quite interesting.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #549 11/27 - 11/28/2006
Post by: klaasend on November 27, 2006, 01:48:34 PM
This just posted on the SM front page by Michael, another poster from the Netherlands that watched the show:

I’m also from The Netherlands and saw the show last night.
Some people here are wondering why the Dutch weren’t posting earlier on this site. I think most Dutch people thought the same I did before I saw the show of Peter R. de Vries. Thousands of girls are missing every year and now some American rich girl with connections is missing in Aruba and the whole US are coming down on the Island and those arrogant Americans try to take over the investigation their way. So I think a lot of the Dutch took automatically the side of the van der Sloots.
In The Netherlands it was not a big news item as it was in the US, so a lot of details which were shown last night in the Peter R. de Vries show were new for most of us.

After seeing the show last night I can’t make any other conclusion then that Joran has something to do with the disappearance of Natalee. I’m not convinced that he killed her because I think that the theory of an overdoses drank and drugs is also a good possibility.

It seems to me that Paul has a part in it also by helping his son to bury Natalee and making up the first story that all three of the boys told the first time. In this story were a lot of small particular details that only a person that has experience with this type of investigations or cases can come up with.

Peter R. de Vries is a investigator with a good reputation in The Netherlands. He helped to solve many cases witch the police couldn’t solve. So it’s a good thing that he picked up this case and maybe last night show woke up The Dutch government in The Hague.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #549 11/27 - 11/28/2006
Post by: klaasend on November 27, 2006, 01:50:51 PM
From another Dutch poster, Michael Vos - posted on the front page of SM:

Helly everyone,

From the start, I was very upset by the way the investigation in the Holloway-case was done. After the airing of the show last night in the Netherlands, two leading newspapers (Telegraaf and Algemeen Dagblad) have published articles that are critical on the whole investigation. A lot of upset reactions are given too on the papers’ websites:

Telegraaf article: http://www.telegraaf.nl/binnenland/54297081/_Onderzoek_zaak_Holloway_gefrustreerd_.html

AD article:
http://www.ad.nl/binnenland/article847686.ece

On this website, it’s easy to copy paste dutch and translate into english:
http://babelfish.altavista.com/

make sure to select English to Dutch and then press translate…

I want to state that there is a large group of people that does not trust the government, police and judicial system on Aruba. I feel that after the airing of Peter R de Vries yesterday, the whole case may be resolved soon. De Vries has a really good reputation in solving ‘cold’ cases and bringing murderers to justice.

The part in which Joran was confronted was very interesting.

I hope this documentary is shown in the US too (subtitled), because it will show you that the Dutch want this case resolved too and are on the side of the Holloway family.

Michael Vos
Leiden - Netherlands


Title: Lively Case Discussion #549 11/27 - 11/28/2006
Post by: Sue on November 27, 2006, 01:56:45 PM
WOOOOOOOOOOOOO HOOOOOOOOOOO
Natalee is making dutch Newspaper


Title: Lively Case Discussion #549 11/27 - 11/28/2006
Post by: San on November 27, 2006, 01:59:44 PM
Quote from: "Tylergal"
Can we bring the post of the wife being questioned in the assault to this page or can we post it on the Anna & Mrs. Marples' thread.  This is quite interesting.


ORANJESTAD – Glenda Oduber, wife of Prime Minister Nelson Oduber (MEP) is called to witness in the matter of the reporting against Minister Ramon Lee.  The national detective is currently investigating a reporting on sexual offence against the minister of Labour, Sport, and Culture.  Oduber’s wife is interrogated because before the reporting, the supposed victim had telephoned her about what happened.   “Hundreds of people call here every day with all sorts of storeys.  We cannot check everything whether they are true or not.  That would mean that we are in court every day or called to witness”, was the premier’s comment on the witness call.  

Oduber says that they received the call to witness via fax around 16:30 on Thursday.  Several newspapers reported this the next day already, which is very strange.  “Only we and the Public prosecutor are supposed to know about the call”, said Oduber.  His opinion is that all the parties have to be careful and reserved about the case.  “It’s a very sensitive matter and I regret the way everything is now in the media.  I also regret the fact that I had to hear the woman cry again telling her story on several radio stations today (Friday, editor).”  

He therefore hopes that the OM will soon have a definite answer on the legal actions and on what had happened exactly.  It’s not right for the government and definitely not for his wife.  He does not understand why his wife was called by the National detectives.  “This is a small community and everybody has stories.  Since I receive a lot of calls, my wife has become kind of a secretary at home.  She hears so many things, but she cannot determine what is true and what is not.  Why didn’t the woman go straight to the police instead of calling my house?  Only somebody that has seen what happened or that knows the details can be considered a witness.  And that’s not my wife.”


Title: Lively Case Discussion #549 11/27 - 11/28/2006
Post by: klaasend on November 27, 2006, 02:22:21 PM
According to the De Vries show, the go between person for the photoshopped photo of Joran was KEES.  This was posted on the JoranVDS Blot back on January 27, 2006:

(http://i14.photobucket.com/albums/a306/klaasend/JVDSblog012606.jpg)


Title: Lively Case Discussion #549 11/27 - 11/28/2006
Post by: msmarple on November 27, 2006, 02:25:21 PM
Quote from: "Tylergal"
Can we bring the post of the wife being questioned in the assault to this page or can we post it on the Anna & Mrs. Marples' thread.  This is quite interesting.


Tyler, Klaas - The case itself is on page 10 of the M&C thread. It would be easiest if Klaas could just edit this tidbit in.

I have some thoughts about what we know of the show yesterday, but also some questions - that I hope a full translation will answer.

Meanwhile, it is awesome that it has generated interest in The Netherlands. As many of us have said, only an outside force is going to crack that Aruba-Dutch wall, and I hope this is the beginning.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #549 11/27 - 11/28/2006
Post by: Tylergal on November 27, 2006, 02:29:06 PM
Quote from: "msmarple"
Quote from: "Tylergal"
Can we bring the post of the wife being questioned in the assault to this page or can we post it on the Anna & Mrs. Marples' thread.  This is quite interesting.


Tyler, Klaas - The case itself is on page 10 of the M&C thread. It would be easiest if Klaas could just edit this tidbit in.

I have some thoughts about what we know of the show yesterday, but also some questions - that I hope a full translation will answer.

Meanwhile, it is awesome that it has generated interest in The Netherlands. As many of us have said, only an outside force is going to crack that Aruba-Dutch wall, and I hope this is the beginning.


Thanx bunches, Ms. Marples and Klaas.  I think that would be great.

I agree this is much needed despite the fact there is nothing here new to us except the photo-shopped picture of the Delicious Sporter with Natalee.  

It makes me wonder regards the "theft" in Joran's apartment if his roommate is undercover while Joran thinks this is his best bud.   :wink:   One never knows where plants reside.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #549 11/27 - 11/28/2006
Post by: Tylergal on November 27, 2006, 02:31:22 PM
Thanks, San, for bringing that over.  This is a strange place, this Aruba.  I wonder what the Dutch really think about this place after all the recent events and reading from a free press, a blog that is free to state beliefs and some myths, and yet stick closely to the truth as we can not knowing anymore than we do and especially not knowing who all the players are.  Karen Janssen never redeemed herself and still does not to this day.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #549 11/27 - 11/28/2006
Post by: Tylergal on November 27, 2006, 02:33:18 PM
Time to do a little work while I listen to the press coverage of Alabama's turn-about in coaches, hang some Christmas ornaments and try to at least get the bows on the wreaths so DH can hang them.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #549 11/27 - 11/28/2006
Post by: klaasend on November 27, 2006, 02:40:11 PM
Quote from: "msmarple"
Quote from: "Tylergal"
Can we bring the post of the wife being questioned in the assault to this page or can we post it on the Anna & Mrs. Marples' thread.  This is quite interesting.


Tyler, Klaas - The case itself is on page 10 of the M&C thread. It would be easiest if Klaas could just edit this tidbit in.

I have some thoughts about what we know of the show yesterday, but also some questions - that I hope a full translation will answer.

Meanwhile, it is awesome that it has generated interest in The Netherlands. As many of us have said, only an outside force is going to crack that Aruba-Dutch wall, and I hope this is the beginning.


Done :wink:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #549 11/27 - 11/28/2006
Post by: Ono on November 27, 2006, 02:40:58 PM
Quote from: "Tylergal"
Time to do a little work while I listen to the press coverage of Alabama's turn-about in coaches, hang some Christmas ornaments and try to at least get the bows on the wreaths so DH can hang them.


Tyler, just tune in to Finebaum now....he just pre-empted Rush Limbaugh by 30 minutes and began his show early he is so gleeful. He's breathless.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #549 11/27 - 11/28/2006
Post by: igsigs on November 27, 2006, 02:53:30 PM
FOB and Daniel

Photochopped

Danny Boy sure has FOB up in arms over his mysterious interpretation of Joran's photoshop efforts. Sure has peaked my interest. Here is my non-conclusive and sure-to-be-wrong read on what he is trying to say...

He knows more about this picture than De Vries. He believes this because surely De Vries would have noted on the program this paticular piece of info if he had known about it. Part of Joran's motivation here was to create the false impression that he knew Natalee before her Aruba trip. Yet because of his knowledge of the history of the original photo and his personal expertise in the related technical field re photo/vids...Daniel believes there was/is something more sinister afoot.

I find Daniel credible here. He is a Sloot defender but not at the expense of justice. And De Vries/Joran have stumbled into an area of interest to Daniel so he decided to speak out. He has offerred to speak to Anita because he believes Joran is lying to her. He also is debating whether or not to inform the police or De Vries. He thinks this whole episode reflects very badly on Joran. Should be interesting...


Title: Lively Case Discussion #549 11/27 - 11/28/2006
Post by: klaasend on November 27, 2006, 03:05:15 PM
Quote from: "igsigs"
FOB and Daniel

Photochopped

Danny Boy sure has FOB up in arms over his mysterious interpretation of Joran's photoshop efforts. Sure has peaked my interest. Here is my non-conclusive and sure-to-be-wrong read on what he is trying to say...

He knows more about this picture than De Vries. He believes this because surely De Vries would have noted on the program this paticular piece of info if he had known about it. Part of Joran's motivation here was to create the false impression that he knew Natalee before her Aruba trip. Yet because of his knowledge of the history of the original photo and his personal expertise in the related technical field re photo/vids...Daniel believes there was/is something more sinister afoot.

I find Daniel credible here. He is a Sloot defender but not at the expense of justice. And De Vries/Joran have stumbled into an area of interest to Daniel so he decided to speak out. He has offerred to speak to Anita because he believes Joran is lying to her. He also is debating whether or not to inform the police or De Vries. He thinks this whole episode reflects very badly on Joran. Should be interesting...

Igsigs - I agree and I'd love to know how Daniel knows so much.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #549 11/27 - 11/28/2006
Post by: nonesuche on November 27, 2006, 03:08:07 PM
privately I think Daniel has always wanted the truth of this, I also trust if he has information of value to the LE that he will address that appropriately.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #549 11/27 - 11/28/2006
Post by: Sue on November 27, 2006, 03:12:16 PM
Todays Greta WIRE

Hi,
Are you aware of the broadcast of famous Dutch crime reporter Peter R. de Vries yesterday, about the Holloway-case? It seems like the local Aruban authorities did frustrate the investigation up to the point, where the detectives were NOT allowed to search the house of the van der Sloots. They did search the small detached house where Joran lived, but they never searched the house of his father.
Isn't it likely that the body of Natalee Holloway could be found, for example, under the floor of this house? No authorities in Aruba were ever allowed to do a forensic investigation there.
I think it's worth watching the Peter R de Vries broadcast, it sheds whole new light on the Aruban investigation and the strange role Dutch magistrates (personal friends of Mr. van der Sloot) played in it.
My guess is Natalee's body can be found in the house of Joran's parents, the only place in Aruba nobody ever took a closer look at, or were prevented from doing so.
Cliff Cremer
Amsterdam
P.S. Did you also know that Joran van der Sloot paid somebody to make a fake photo of him with Natalee?
http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,232082,00.html


Title: Lively Case Discussion #549 11/27 - 11/28/2006
Post by: Anna on November 27, 2006, 03:13:10 PM
Hi, Igs,
Just doing a drive by but inform the police of what I wonder?  I don't remember Daniel as being prone to drama and if he says he knows something I think he just might know something.   :shock:

Could he have spoken to the person who did the shopping and knows what Joran ordered, the look he was going for?

Please post if he offers more information for I am particularly interested in his take on this.  It is the shocking expose, not Bouti claiming Natalee did cocaine or whatever.  Lazlo obviously missed that show where Dompig did nothing except blather on about that.  Dompig also discussed digging up Natalee's remains and moving them like some ghoul that left my jaw on the floor.  Never heard such in my life as that man going on about that as though this is normal behavior.

CryBabyBorg,

Please continue to post and don't worry about what you may or may not have missed.  We go over everything fifty times at least if you will recall and if you are missing some detail, I am sure monkeys will add it for you, etc.

Unfortunately, information is so slow in coming in this investigation that you likely have not missed a thing!  We just review and rehash the old stuff over and over because it is all we have.   :(


And I am surprised to see some of the Dutch posters doing an about-face because of this deVries.  No, I am not really because this is what I thought it would take for them to see the light.  It has to come from one of their own for them to believe it.  :?  But at least a few have now admitted how guilty Joran does appear at long last.  Some seemed to really believe it was some sort of personal vendetta against the Sporter instead of wanting to know the truth.  I don't care who did it as long as justice is obtained by whatever means.  I do thank deVries for that and for featuring this on his program.

And he left it just right for future programs to be added as well.  Many areas he can yet cover.  I hope that he will do so and am delighted two big Dutch newspapers are carrying the story of his show.

.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #549 11/27 - 11/28/2006
Post by: igsigs on November 27, 2006, 03:15:26 PM
Quote from: "klaasend"
Igsigs - I agree and I'd love to know how Daniel knows so much.

Did you see where Daniel made note of his involvement in the civil case? It's all so odd. Daniel is not one to brag or mislead...or to make something out of nothing, IMO. It sounds like he is very upset at Joran for deceiving his parents. He said if he tells the police then it will have *real consequences for real people*.  I cannot imagine what this is all about.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #549 11/27 - 11/28/2006
Post by: Anna on November 27, 2006, 03:17:33 PM
Sue,
I wonder what Greta is "inclined to believe" about that photoshopped bonkers photo Joran had cooked up.  Does anyone know if Greta speaks/reads Dutch?  That is likely her husband's last name but I was just wondering if she speaks Dutch and could watch deVries.

She needs pointers in how to cover an investigation.   :wink:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #549 11/27 - 11/28/2006
Post by: Anna on November 27, 2006, 03:19:27 PM
Quote from: "igsigs"
Quote from: "klaasend"
Igsigs - I agree and I'd love to know how Daniel knows so much.

Did you see where Daniel made note of his involvement in the civil case? It's all so odd. Daniel is not one to brag or mislead...or to make something out of nothing, IMO. It sounds like he is very upset at Joran for deceiving his parents. He said if he tells the police then it will have *real consequences for real people*.  I cannot imagine what this is all about.


 :shock:  :shock:  :shock:

We would love for that to happen!  Sounds sort of threatening.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #549 11/27 - 11/28/2006
Post by: nonesuche on November 27, 2006, 03:19:51 PM
Quote from: "igsigs"
Quote from: "klaasend"
Igsigs - I agree and I'd love to know how Daniel knows so much.

Did you see where Daniel made note of his involvement in the civil case? It's all so odd. Daniel is not one to brag or mislead...or to make something out of nothing, IMO. It sounds like he is very upset at Joran for deceiving his parents. He said if he tells the police then it will have *real consequences for real people*.  I cannot imagine what this is all about.


igsigs-

Daniel is posting these things at FOB? TIA


Title: Lively Case Discussion #549 11/27 - 11/28/2006
Post by: Sue on November 27, 2006, 03:20:45 PM
Quote from: "Anna"
Sue,
I wonder what Greta is "inclined to believe" about that photoshopped bonkers photo Joran had cooked up.  Does anyone know if Greta speaks/reads Dutch?  That is likely her husband's last name but I was just wondering if she speaks Dutch and could watch deVries.

She needs pointers in how to cover an investigation.   :wink:


I dont believe Greta speaks dutch, Im pretty sure alot of reports she had , had to be translated for Fox.. The guy that wrote the email should
have sent the pictures also


Title: Lively Case Discussion #549 11/27 - 11/28/2006
Post by: nonesuche on November 27, 2006, 03:20:50 PM
Quote from: "Anna"
Sue,
I wonder what Greta is "inclined to believe" about that photoshopped bonkers photo Joran had cooked up.  Does anyone know if Greta speaks/reads Dutch?  That is likely her husband's last name but I was just wondering if she speaks Dutch and could watch deVries.

She needs pointers in how to cover an investigation.   :wink:


I am worse than you about Greta, I regret that Joran didn't trouble to make a photoshopped photo of he and Greta, with her swooning over him for posterity  :roll:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #549 11/27 - 11/28/2006
Post by: klaasend on November 27, 2006, 03:20:52 PM
Quote from: "igsigs"
Quote from: "klaasend"
Igsigs - I agree and I'd love to know how Daniel knows so much.

Did you see where Daniel made note of his involvement in the civil case? It's all so odd. Daniel is not one to brag or mislead...or to make something out of nothing, IMO. It sounds like he is very upset at Joran for deceiving his parents. He said if he tells the police then it will have *real consequences for real people*.  I cannot imagine what this is all about.

Yes I did see that.  Very interresting!


Title: Lively Case Discussion #549 11/27 - 11/28/2006
Post by: Frijole on November 27, 2006, 03:22:45 PM
Quote from: "klaasend"
Quote from: "igsigs"
Quote from: "klaasend"
Igsigs - I agree and I'd love to know how Daniel knows so much.

Did you see where Daniel made note of his involvement in the civil case? It's all so odd. Daniel is not one to brag or mislead...or to make something out of nothing, IMO. It sounds like he is very upset at Joran for deceiving his parents. He said if he tells the police then it will have *real consequences for real people*.  I cannot imagine what this is all about.

Yes I did see that.  Very interresting!


I went over to FOB to check it out... didn't see it... was this recently? Was it at FOB?  I can only read so much at those other sites before I have to leave and run to the bathroom to vomit.   :lol:   Thanks!


Title: Lively Case Discussion #549 11/27 - 11/28/2006
Post by: igsigs on November 27, 2006, 03:24:35 PM
Will do Anna. FOB is hard to wade through nowadays, though. It's just JR, his mom and 20 SandraKs all in need of smelling salts at the mere mention of De Vries.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #549 11/27 - 11/28/2006
Post by: Sue on November 27, 2006, 03:24:51 PM
Granny Toad refered to the photo as a trophy photo
Joran is a twisted soul, HIs parents created a monster and they need
to step up and shut him down before his next victim


Title: Lively Case Discussion #549 11/27 - 11/28/2006
Post by: Anna on November 27, 2006, 03:25:24 PM
Quote from: "Sue"
[
I dont believe Greta speaks dutch, Im pretty sure alot of reports she had , had to be translated for Fox.. The guy that wrote the email should
have sent the pictures also



I wondered if they had to be translated for her or for the general public but think you are likely correct that she does not speak Dutch.

I wonder if she has seen the finished product shown yesterday yet?  For sure she needs to!  

Yes it would be hilarious if Joran made one or two featuring Greta as well, lol.   :D  :D  :D


Title: Lively Case Discussion #549 11/27 - 11/28/2006
Post by: klaasend on November 27, 2006, 03:27:05 PM
Quote from: "Frijole"
Quote from: "klaasend"
Quote from: "igsigs"
Quote from: "klaasend"
Igsigs - I agree and I'd love to know how Daniel knows so much.

Did you see where Daniel made note of his involvement in the civil case? It's all so odd. Daniel is not one to brag or mislead...or to make something out of nothing, IMO. It sounds like he is very upset at Joran for deceiving his parents. He said if he tells the police then it will have *real consequences for real people*.  I cannot imagine what this is all about.

Yes I did see that.  Very interresting!


I went over to FOB to check it out... didn't see it... was this recently? Was it at FOB?  I can only read so much at those other sites before I have to leave and run to the bathroom to vomit.   :lol:   Thanks!


It was last night and this morning/today in the De Vries thread I think starting on page 20 today.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #549 11/27 - 11/28/2006
Post by: Frijole on November 27, 2006, 03:28:11 PM
Quote from: "igsigs"
Will do Anna. FOB is hard to wade through nowadays, though. It's just JR, his mom and 20 SandraKs all in need of smelling salts at the mere mention of De Vries.
:lol:  :lol:  :lol:  :lol:  :lol:  :lol:  :lol:  :lol:  :lol:  :lol:  :lol:  :lol:  :lol:  :lol:  :lol:  :lol:

Love it!


Title: Lively Case Discussion #549 11/27 - 11/28/2006
Post by: Frijole on November 27, 2006, 03:28:54 PM
Thanks Klaas!


Title: Lively Case Discussion #549 11/27 - 11/28/2006
Post by: Anna on November 27, 2006, 03:31:36 PM
I am bathing dogs while the weather is perfect and also I am working in the yard to pick up limbs that blow down from the big trees when there is wind so the dogs do not run into them on the ground.  Can stick in their eyes, always remove downed limbs around dogs, especially small ones.

I try to read at FOB but that forum is so strange, like it starts in the middle of the screen.  And today I just haven't had time.  The weather here is just gorgeous and must take advantage of if while it is here.

I am depending on observant monkeys to gather the news and information and return to the cage with it all.

It must be highly entertaining to watch them try to pretend that this sick photo Joran had is normal.  :D
.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #549 11/27 - 11/28/2006
Post by: Sue on November 27, 2006, 03:32:12 PM
This is so much to soak in..My head is spinning..
Where do we go from here? How do we get the answer the family
so desperately needs? Will De Vries keep covering this case?
or will he drop the ball? The interest of many are peaked including
many from Holland.. What will it take to crack someone?
Does anyone think that the Kalpoes will be realeased on the 30th?
Does anyone know what the family thinks of all of this?


Title: Lively Case Discussion #549 11/27 - 11/28/2006
Post by: klaasend on November 27, 2006, 03:36:26 PM
Quote from: "Sue"
This is so much to soak in..My head is spinning..
Where do we go from here? How do we get the answer the family
so desperately needs? Will De Vries keep covering this case?
or will he drop the ball? The interest of many are peaked including
many from Holland.. What will it take to crack someone?
Does anyone think that the Kalpoes will be realeased on the 30th?
Does anyone know what the family thinks of all of this?

It sounds as though De Vries plans at least one follow-up program.  The reactions from the Dutch have been that they agree Joran is guilty and there are problems with the Prosecutors office and investigation.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #549 11/27 - 11/28/2006
Post by: Sue on November 27, 2006, 03:41:53 PM
Quote from: "klaasend"
Quote from: "Sue"
This is so much to soak in..My head is spinning..
Where do we go from here? How do we get the answer the family
so desperately needs? Will De Vries keep covering this case?
or will he drop the ball? The interest of many are peaked including
many from Holland.. What will it take to crack someone?
Does anyone think that the Kalpoes will be realeased on the 30th?
Does anyone know what the family thinks of all of this?

It sounds as though De Vries plans at least one follow-up program.  The reactions from the Dutch have been that they agree Joran is guilty and there are problems with the Prosecutors office and investigation.


Well I will add that to my prayer list.. At this point it is critical they DO NOT
drop the ball, the interest is there and people are listening now and will listen more if more information is available.. It makes me happy that there are wonderful people in Holland that fully understand the families dismay with this investigation and how everything from day on was mishandled..


Title: Lively Case Discussion #549 11/27 - 11/28/2006
Post by: sharon on November 27, 2006, 03:46:08 PM
Quote from: "klaasend"
as though De Vries plans at least one follow-up program.  The reactions from the Dutch have been that they agree Joran is guilty and there are problems with the Prosecutors office and investigation.


I agree klaas!

I went to the comments sections of the 2 Dutch papers that the front page poster provided -- and let babelfish do it's magic.

There are a few 'trolls', which is to be expected, but the vast majority are overwhelming in agreement that Joran is guilty, his father played a huge role, and the Dutch on the island are to blame for the coverup.

.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #549 11/27 - 11/28/2006
Post by: Sue on November 27, 2006, 03:50:36 PM

I really want to be a FLY on the wall of the investigators
in Holland that have taken over the case.. I really wonder
what they are thinking and what exactly they are doing
if anything


Title: Lively Case Discussion #549 11/27 - 11/28/2006
Post by: A's Fever on November 27, 2006, 03:50:45 PM
Quote from: "klaasend"
Quote from: "igsigs"
Quote from: "klaasend"
Igsigs - I agree and I'd love to know how Daniel knows so much.

Did you see where Daniel made note of his involvement in the civil case? It's all so odd. Daniel is not one to brag or mislead...or to make something out of nothing, IMO. It sounds like he is very upset at Joran for deceiving his parents. He said if he tells the police then it will have *real consequences for real people*.  I cannot imagine what this is all about.

Yes I did see that.  Very interresting!


But why the reluctance to go to the police?  If there are consequences, then can we assume that people deserve the consequences?  This has gone on an agonizingly long time for the family.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #549 11/27 - 11/28/2006
Post by: Dihannah1 on November 27, 2006, 04:02:10 PM
A's Fever,  Would you trust going to the police in Aruba?  Look how they've botched and lost everything up until now.  I wouldn't trust them.  However, who DO they go to?  There has to be somebody trustworthy to go to.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #549 11/27 - 11/28/2006
Post by: Dihannah1 on November 27, 2006, 04:02:48 PM
A's Fever,  Would you trust going to the police in Aruba?  Look how they've botched and lost everything up until now.  I wouldn't trust them.  However, who DO they go to?  There has to be somebody trustworthy to go to.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #549 11/27 - 11/28/2006
Post by: A's Fever on November 27, 2006, 04:04:41 PM
Quote from: "Dihannah1"
A's Fever,  Would you trust going to the police in Aruba?  Look how they've botched and lost everything up until now.  I wouldn't trust them.  However, who DO they go to?  There has to be somebody trustworthy to go to.


I was thinking that Daniel is Dutch not Aruban and that he would go to the Dutch police.  But yes, definitely not ALE!


Title: Lively Case Discussion #549 11/27 - 11/28/2006
Post by: cubbeegirl on November 27, 2006, 04:04:42 PM
Quote from: "Dihannah1"
A's Fever,  Would you trust going to the police in Aruba?  Look how they've botched and lost everything up until now.  I wouldn't trust them.  However, who DO they go to?  There has to be somebody trustworthy to go to.



... one would certainlly hope that there would be someone trustworthy.....


Title: Lively Case Discussion #549 11/27 - 11/28/2006
Post by: Dihannah1 on November 27, 2006, 04:04:50 PM
:oops:  sorry for dupe. post....


Title: Lively Case Discussion #549 11/27 - 11/28/2006
Post by: A's Fever on November 27, 2006, 04:05:47 PM
Quote from: "cubbeegirl"
Quote from: "Dihannah1"
A's Fever,  Would you trust going to the police in Aruba?  Look how they've botched and lost everything up until now.  I wouldn't trust them.  However, who DO they go to?  There has to be somebody trustworthy to go to.



... one would certainlly hope that there would be someone trustworthy.....



The family comes to mind also, and the FBI.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #549 11/27 - 11/28/2006
Post by: Dihannah1 on November 27, 2006, 04:06:23 PM
Quote from: "A's Fever"
Quote from: "Dihannah1"
A's Fever,  Would you trust going to the police in Aruba?  Look how they've botched and lost everything up until now.  I wouldn't trust them.  However, who DO they go to?  There has to be somebody trustworthy to go to.


I was thinking that Daniel is Dutch not Aruban and that he would go to the Dutch police.  But yes, definitely not ALE!


True, good point.  I wasn't thinking about Dutch one's.....


Title: Lively Case Discussion #549 11/27 - 11/28/2006
Post by: klaasend on November 27, 2006, 04:08:03 PM
Posted on the front page of SM by Amsterdamned:

Dagboek van maandag 27 november
“Joran van der Sloot is ziek”. Uiteindelijk is deze uitspraak van een van zijn beste vrienden de kern van de hele uitzending van gisteravond, van Peter de Vries, over de zaak Natalee Holloway. Ik vind het overtuigend. Ik dacht eerst ook dat een normale jongen van zeventien die je aan strenge politieverhoren onderwerpt, wel door zal slaan. Maar Joran is niet zo normaal. Ik had destijds ook al wat twijfels bij die rare website van hem, maar dat hij en zijn vader zo doortrapt zouden zijn als ze nu werden afgeschilderd kon ik toen nog niet bevroeden. Wel vreemd dat al die Amerikaanse verslaggevers niks zinnigs boven water wisten te krijgen, hoe professioneel zijn die Amerikaanse journalisten eigenlijk? Of hebben ze hier alleen hun sensatiepoot voor laten uitrukken?

Ik ben ook erg benieuwd wat Revu-collega Zvetzana, die bezig is met een boek over de affaire, van de uitzending vindt. Zij heeft veel contact gehad met de familie Van der Sloot. Ik heb haar inmiddels even gebeld en uiteraard heeft ze met veel interesse gekeken, maar ze mag er niks over zeggen, van de uitgever. Off the record hebben we nog wel wat gebabbeld, dat blijft uiteraard onder de pet. Haar boek komt in april uit. Foto rechts: de gemanipuleerde foto die Joran van zichzelf en Natalee liet maken en waaruit zou moeten blijken dat hij bij Natalee thuis is geweest.

This comment was published today on:http://misdaadjournalist.web-log.nl/

One of the best crime journalist of the netherlands.

He also announced that there will be soon a book published (by zvetzana) about The Holloway case.

TRANSLATED ROUGHLY THROUGH BABEL FISH:
day book of Monday 27 November "Joran of of the ditch are sick". Eventually this pronouncement of of its best friends the core of the complete retransmission of yesterday evening is, of peter freeze, concerning the case Natalee Holloway. I find it persuading. I thought firstly also that a normal boy of seventeen who you submit to strict politieverhoren will beat, however, by. But Joran are not this way normal. I had then also all what doubts at that strange Internet site of him, but that he and its father this way cunning would be such as them were now depicted could I then not yet suspect. However, strange that all could those American report donors get nothing sensible above water, how professional are those American journalists actual? Or them to only their sensation leg have let turn out for this? I have been also a lot aroused curiosity what Revu-collega find Zvetzana, which is busy with a book concerning the affair, of the retransmission. She has had much contact with the family of of the ditch. I have meanwhile just as rung its and of course them with much interest have looked at, but she can say nothing, of the editor. Off the record we have still what chattered, which remains of course under the cap. Its book is produced in April. Photograph Right: the manipulated photograph which let make Joran of itself and Natalee and from which appear would have that he has been at Natalee at home. This comment were published today on:http://misdaadjournalist.web-log.nl/ One or the best crime journalist or the netherlands. He also announced that there will be soon a book published (by zvetzana) about The Holloway case.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #549 11/27 - 11/28/2006
Post by: dkpen on November 27, 2006, 04:15:48 PM
Hi everyone!

Trying to catch up. Been buzzing around today. Beautiful beautiful glorious day here in sunny Florida.  :P  I love living in Florida.  :P


De Vries I think shed some light on the case last night. He let the Dutch understand better about the investigation, or lack there of, and the corruption/cover-ups within the ALE, Officials and the families involved. (ie Joran, Paulus and friends.)

I am not so sure what will become of it since De Vries show aired, concidering how corrupt Aruba is. I don't think they will budge. Not unless some BIG brother mafia says so. Those in Aruba don't do anything unless orders handed down to them. And I wouldn't be surprised if Chavez or those in that neighborhood aren't well connected or involved in helping with the cover-ups. JMO


Title: Lively Case Discussion #549 11/27 - 11/28/2006
Post by: Sue on November 27, 2006, 04:28:46 PM
So If I am reading that right about that amsterdam poster
is He/she saying that Jorans book will have the photo in it ??
tell me im reading wrong


Title: Lively Case Discussion #549 11/27 - 11/28/2006
Post by: cubbeegirl on November 27, 2006, 04:32:12 PM
Quote from: "Sue"
So If I am reading that right about that amsterdam poster
is He/she saying that Jorans book will have the photo in it ??
tell me im reading wrong



I think you are reading it right....


Title: Lively Case Discussion #549 11/27 - 11/28/2006
Post by: dkpen on November 27, 2006, 04:32:58 PM
I truly believe Joran to be a lethal predator. Especially after seeing the picture of Joran and Natalee photo shopped.  

What person in their right mind would do this(photoshop) who is a suspect in a murder case? I mean, come on. The boy has major issues. And I would hope and pray his family would put Joran into therapy to help him before he gets way out of controll and strikes out again. Papa Sloot may not be able to help him out the next time around. How ever the count is by now. I truly believe it's not the first time and it won't be the last. Once they get a taste of killing or death involved it only escalates and starts a sequence of events that will cause a second, third, ect.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #549 11/27 - 11/28/2006
Post by: dkpen on November 27, 2006, 04:45:38 PM
You know with this picture of Joran and Natalee is disturbing to me. I can't get it out of my head. ugh!

Taking or making of souviners from or of the victim(s) is evidence of fantasy at work.  Joran has major issues.

GET THE BOY HELP NOW ANITA! Please, before another girl falls victim to your ill-begotten son.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #549 11/27 - 11/28/2006
Post by: San on November 27, 2006, 04:46:20 PM
Quote from: "dkpen"
I truly believe Joran to be a lethal predator. Especially after seeing the picture of Joran and Natalee photo shopped.  

What person in their right mind would do this(photoshop) who is a suspect in a murder case? I mean, come on. The boy has major issues. And I would hope and pray his family would put Joran into therapy to help him before he gets way out of controll and strikes out again. Papa Sloot may not be able to help him out the next time around. How ever the count is by now. I truly believe it's not the first time and it won't be the last. Once they get a taste of killing or death involved it only escalates and starts a sequence of events that will cause a second, third, ect.


I agree that Joran is a lethal predator.  Joran was in therapy and it did not help him.  Paulus is just as twisted as his son.  I believe a lot of what Joran has learned came from his father.  I agree that Joran will try and strike again and hopefully someone is watching him closely.  I also feel that Paulus believes in his own mind that Joran will not do this again.  One of Paulus' comments in an interview he did was that "Joran has changed".  I take it as him saying oh Joran has learned his lesson and he won't do it again so don't worry.  That is a sick mentality to think like that.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #549 11/27 - 11/28/2006
Post by: igsigs on November 27, 2006, 04:49:42 PM
From Robin on BFN

We have no knowledge of any drug use and am sad that it is even an issue.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #549 11/27 - 11/28/2006
Post by: Sue on November 27, 2006, 04:52:36 PM
Quote from: "dkpen"
You know with this picture of Joran and Natalee is disturbing to me. I can't get it out of my head. ugh!

Taking or making of souviners from or of the victim(s) is evidence of fantasy at work.  Joran has major issues.

GET THE BOY HELP NOW ANITA! Please, before another girl falls victim to your ill-begotten son.



she cant help her boy... she cant help herself


Title: Lively Case Discussion #549 11/27 - 11/28/2006
Post by: Sue on November 27, 2006, 04:54:59 PM


Paul and Anita are complete failures of parents..
they cant save there son as they created the monster he is


Title: Lively Case Discussion #549 11/27 - 11/28/2006
Post by: AZLady on November 27, 2006, 04:55:10 PM
Hi Monkeys.  Just taking a break now from grading argumentative essays (ugh) and checking in.  Lots of talk and interest now in what will happen next.  The ball is in the Dutch investigator's court now.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #549 11/27 - 11/28/2006
Post by: San on November 27, 2006, 04:58:09 PM
With the De Vries show last night it seems to have taken a lot of attention off the Kalpoes.  I think we all agree that Joran is the murderer but the Kalpoes are also guilty of Kidnapping and Rape.  So when the judge rules in favor of the Kalpoes I am going to be pissed off.  Are they trying to soften that blow by bringing all this attention on Joran.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #549 11/27 - 11/28/2006
Post by: San on November 27, 2006, 04:59:43 PM
Quote from: "Sue"


Paul and Anita are complete failures of parents..
they cant save there son as they created the monster he is

I couldn't agree more.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #549 11/27 - 11/28/2006
Post by: sharon on November 27, 2006, 05:03:26 PM
Quote from: "dkpen"
Hi everyone!

Trying to catch up. Been buzzing around today. Beautiful beautiful glorious day here in sunny Florida.  :P  I love living in Florida.  :P



 :D

Where are you dkpen??

It's been drizzling and raining all day here in Miami.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #549 11/27 - 11/28/2006
Post by: dkpen on November 27, 2006, 05:08:15 PM
Quote from: "sharon"
Quote from: "dkpen"
Hi everyone!

Trying to catch up. Been buzzing around today. Beautiful beautiful glorious day here in sunny Florida.  :P  I love living in Florida.  :P



 :D

Where are you dkpen??

It's been drizzling and raining all day here in Miami.


Pensacola, Florida area.  We had a lot of rain last week with a LOT of heavy wind. Then it turned cold a few days down in it's mid to high 30s. The last two days has been soooo beautiful. Back in its 70s.  :D


Title: Lively Case Discussion #549 11/27 - 11/28/2006
Post by: igsigs on November 27, 2006, 05:09:12 PM
Quote from: "San"
With the De Vries show last night it seems to have taken a lot of attention off the Kalpoes.  I think we all agree that Joran is the murderer but the Kalpoes are also guilty of Kidnapping and Rape.  So when the judge rules in favor of the Kalpoes I am going to be pissed off.  Are they trying to soften that blow by bringing all this attention on Joran.

I betcha Witt, Smid and Co. are very aware of De Vries' accusations. They are cornered. Joran and the Ks are still telling different stories. If they release the K's this week from suspect status then they are admittting that Joran's story is BS. And it makes any past or future ruling in favor of Joran look corrupt.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #549 11/27 - 11/28/2006
Post by: robots on November 27, 2006, 05:13:18 PM
monsters like joran do things like the picture thing because they THINK they are UNTOUCHABLE


so did CAPONE  8)


didnt capone die in PRISON


Title: Lively Case Discussion #549 11/27 - 11/28/2006
Post by: dkpen on November 27, 2006, 05:17:25 PM
I don't think the Kalpoes are directly involved in Natalees demise but indirectly involved by association, after the fact. Oh they may of been involved in the act of rape, but not her death.

I believe Deepak knows a LOT more than he is telling. Satish knows something but I don't think he knows everything. Hince why Deepak wants to keep his younger brother out of it.

Joran is directly involved with Natalees demise and directly involved with her disappearance. Same goes with Paulus. He is directly involved with her disappearance.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #549 11/27 - 11/28/2006
Post by: blah on November 27, 2006, 05:19:17 PM
Quote from: "dkpen"
I don't think the Kalpoes are directly involved in Natalees demise but indirectly involved by association, after the fact. Oh they may of been involved in the act of rape, but not her death.

I believe Deepak knows a LOT more than he is telling. Satish knows something but I don't think he knows everything. Hince why Deepak wants to keep his younger brother out of it.

Joran is directly involved with Natalees demise and directly involved with her disappearance. Same goes with Paulus. He is directly involved with her disappearance.


i agree


Title: Lively Case Discussion #549 11/27 - 11/28/2006
Post by: robots on November 27, 2006, 05:24:59 PM
normal people do not PHOTO SHOP or superimpose themselves with a friend or family member UNLESS the person is the PREIDENT of the UNITED STATES or a MOVIE STAR that you can do for a couple of bucks  at PARKS

i think at amusement parks you can do it

OTHER than that

NAME one other person in the WORLD that would do what JORANSTEIN
did


SICK BASTARD  :evil:  :evil:  :evil:  :evil:

PAULUS is not only a failed JUDGE but also a FAILED PARENT


Title: Lively Case Discussion #549 11/27 - 11/28/2006
Post by: San on November 27, 2006, 05:25:39 PM
Quote from: "robots"
monsters like joran do things like the picture thing because they THINK they are UNTOUCHABLE


so did CAPONE  8)


didnt capone die in PRISON


While at Alcatraz, he exhibited signs of syphilitic dementia. Capone spent the rest of his felony sentence in the hospital. On January 6, 1939, his prison term expired and he was transferred to Terminal Island, a Federal Correctional Institution in California, to serve his one-year misdemeanor sentence. He was finally released on November 16, 1939, but still had to pay fines and court costs of $37,617.51.

After his release, Capone spent a short time in the hospital. He returned to his home in Palm Island where the rest of his life was relaxed and quiet. His mind and body continued to deteriorate so that he could no longer run the outfit. On January 21, 1947, he had an apoplectic stoke that was probably unrelated to his syphilis. He regained consciousness and began to improve until pneumonia set in on January 24. He died the next day from cardiac arrest. Capone was first buried in Mount Olivet Cemetery in Chicago's far South Side between the graves of his father, Gabriele, and brother, Frank, but in March of 1950 the remains of all three were moved to Mount Carmel Cemetery on the far West Side.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #549 11/27 - 11/28/2006
Post by: the big hammer on November 27, 2006, 05:26:19 PM
Antonio Carlo

The conscience-plagued sloot attorney seems to have had second thoughts about his role in covering up a murder, and his own culpability, if his deviant and psychologically-tortured client happens to harm another girl.

The exchange descibed by De Vreis between Jannsen and Carlo, where Carlo evidently approached Jannsen w/ relevant information about the case, and indicates he is aware that jvds bears criminal responsibility for Natalee's disappearance (murder, rape, etc).  

This is strange indeed.  And borders on legal malpractice which could void any judgement against jvds in the future.  And what does Jannsen do?  She attempts to broker further info and Carlo says she'll have to find the "evidence" herself.  And where do we end up?

Nowhere.  Right where we were.

De Vreis attempts to interview Carlo re: these strange events, and Antonio does what all Dutch Arubans do best: he deflects and then runs away.

IMO, the De Vreis show accomplished much in terms of informing and educating Dutch audiences about the events surrounding the murder of Natalee.

I think one of the things accomplished also was the destruction of Karin Jannsen's career.  She deserves it, and verily so, for her base and incompetent handling of this case, and by leading the false arrests of the security guards.

De Vreis should get this incompetent and dangerous woman ( who actually had the temerity and gall to write in a letter to the US Dept of Justice inquiring whether Beth Holloway Twitty was directly related to Adolph Hitler ) on his show next for a detailed interview.  

Her record in this case should be broadcast, as warning to people everywhere who want or need to know the state of jurisprudence in the place formerly known as Aruba.

.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #549 11/27 - 11/28/2006
Post by: San on November 27, 2006, 05:29:15 PM
Quote from: "dkpen"
I don't think the Kalpoes are directly involved in Natalees demise but indirectly involved by association, after the fact. Oh they may of been involved in the act of rape, but not her death.

I believe Deepak knows a LOT more than he is telling. Satish knows something but I don't think he knows everything. Hince why Deepak wants to keep his younger brother out of it.

Joran is directly involved with Natalees demise and directly involved with her disappearance. Same goes with Paulus. He is directly involved with her disappearance.

What stands out in my mind is when Beth asked Deepak "Did you help her Deepak".  He stood there motionless.  Deepak and Satish were present when Natalee was severely harmed.  Satish would have never asked his brother how is the girl.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #549 11/27 - 11/28/2006
Post by: dkpen on November 27, 2006, 05:29:39 PM
Fantasy's Integral Role

"The serial killer, much like the chronic gambler and problem drinker, is addicted to the use fantasy."

Addiction's purpose is that of a coping devise. It becomes the method by which the addice can "manage and magically control multiple forms of anxiety".

Addiction is a progressive disease.

"Simply put, it gets worse."

The similarities between sexual addiction, for example, and gambling addiction, and alcoholism, are greater than one would expect.  :?


Title: Lively Case Discussion #549 11/27 - 11/28/2006
Post by: robots on November 27, 2006, 05:30:04 PM
JANNSEN is in BED with PAULUS





i know i know i know


after you read the above statement please feel free to take a LONG HOT SHOWER to get rid of the GROSS feeling while your imagination goes HAY WIRE  :twisted:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #549 11/27 - 11/28/2006
Post by: robots on November 27, 2006, 05:30:54 PM
Quote from: "San"
Quote from: "dkpen"
I don't think the Kalpoes are directly involved in Natalees demise but indirectly involved by association, after the fact. Oh they may of been involved in the act of rape, but not her death.

I believe Deepak knows a LOT more than he is telling. Satish knows something but I don't think he knows everything. Hince why Deepak wants to keep his younger brother out of it.

Joran is directly involved with Natalees demise and directly involved with her disappearance. Same goes with Paulus. He is directly involved with her disappearance.

What stands out in my mind is when Beth asked Deepak "Did you help her Deepak".  He stood there motionless.  Deepak and Satish were present when Natalee was severely harmed.  Satish would have never asked his brother how is the girl.



JACKPOT !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!


Title: Lively Case Discussion #549 11/27 - 11/28/2006
Post by: robots on November 27, 2006, 05:31:49 PM
Quote from: "San"
Quote from: "robots"
monsters like joran do things like the picture thing because they THINK they are UNTOUCHABLE


so did CAPONE  8)


didnt capone die in PRISON


While at Alcatraz, he exhibited signs of syphilitic dementia. Capone spent the rest of his felony sentence in the hospital. On January 6, 1939, his prison term expired and he was transferred to Terminal Island, a Federal Correctional Institution in California, to serve his one-year misdemeanor sentence. He was finally released on November 16, 1939, but still had to pay fines and court costs of $37,617.51.

After his release, Capone spent a short time in the hospital. He returned to his home in Palm Island where the rest of his life was relaxed and quiet. His mind and body continued to deteriorate so that he could no longer run the outfit. On January 21, 1947, he had an apoplectic stoke that was probably unrelated to his syphilis. He regained consciousness and began to improve until pneumonia set in on January 24. He died the next day from cardiac arrest. Capone was first buried in Mount Olivet Cemetery in Chicago's far South Side between the graves of his father, Gabriele, and brother, Frank, but in March of 1950 the remains of all three were moved to Mount Carmel Cemetery on the far West Side.


thanks  :D


Title: Lively Case Discussion #549 11/27 - 11/28/2006
Post by: robots on November 27, 2006, 05:38:12 PM
"I don't know where she is buried"




said by JORAN VAN DER SLOOT



wrong answer idiot :evil:


he is saying she was BURIED and he doesnt want to tell the police or anyone else where he buried her


hmmmmmmmmm...ADMISSION in my BOOK that he knows she was dead and she was buried


LOCK THESE PEOPLE UP


Title: Lively Case Discussion #549 11/27 - 11/28/2006
Post by: robots on November 27, 2006, 05:39:22 PM
"I don't know where she is buried"


Title: Lively Case Discussion #549 11/27 - 11/28/2006
Post by: memphis on November 27, 2006, 05:41:52 PM
Quote from: "klaasend"
According to the De Vries show, the go between person for the photoshopped photo of Joran was KEES.  This was posted on the JoranVDS Blot back on January 27, 2006:

(http://i14.photobucket.com/albums/a306/klaasend/JVDSblog012606.jpg)


Klaas you really are amazing!!
I can't believe that you remembered Kees in this little exchange.
Wow! Good job!

Now when did those party pictures first show up on RU?


Title: Lively Case Discussion #549 11/27 - 11/28/2006
Post by: dkpen on November 27, 2006, 05:43:47 PM
I wonder if Joran has ever had a Psychopaths PCL-R test. hmmm Would be interesting to know if he has and what the scores were, if indeed he has.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #549 11/27 - 11/28/2006
Post by: robots on November 27, 2006, 05:44:42 PM
i hate em all


Title: Lively Case Discussion #549 11/27 - 11/28/2006
Post by: Sue on November 27, 2006, 05:45:10 PM
Quote from: "robots"
i hate em all


I hate them all also


Title: Lively Case Discussion #549 11/27 - 11/28/2006
Post by: the big hammer on November 27, 2006, 05:46:27 PM
Dutchlady on Trophy-Taking

From Scared Monkeys September 21, 2005:

Yes. In the case of where suspects, or persons who display a perchant for internet profiles that include deviant behaviour, and show sexual connotations as in Joran and one male in some male voyeur behaviour as 'wanted' pose, this supports the minds of relaying activities of such a nature.

Now on tv last night was a Major in real life who castigated on camera a family who's son was drinking openly in the holiday camp as not acceptable behaviour. This was filmed in England. It showed the Major as camp manager not allowing and subjecting father and family to the wrongs of illegal drinking as under age. Contrast this filmed documentary with what is known of Joran as under 17 and the values placed by the parents as European values.

In going further this Major would be of the same mind as me and others that what is shown on published material is a portrayal of persons wrapped in clingfilm, garrotted or intoxicated and in some humiliating pose. In contrast Joran to gay persons asked is 'inviting his body' as lure, so is that the message he is getting to any person who views the photographs? If not what other reason for the person who took and staged the photoshoot, and the actors themselves who have 'played' in these parts. I do think that in human behaviours and the reports that simple sex as normal behaviour of juveniles is not what has been happening on Aruba. It seems that the game is as known to other sectioned communities a trophy and they do take trophies.

If one takes a girl who is selected and informs on the internet of the 'prize' as an assumption of choice, for they may have had others in the frame, then this one was the most easy. She would have been led to one, and not known this was 'three strange guys' who's car she got into. In fact Deepak is calling himself one of those 'strange guys'. This is the actor phase coming out as it is dissociation that he was the one driving and in control of the whole situation. The driver has a lot of power. Hence. the place said to be the command centre all along had to be a private, controlled premises where they were safe. That means no interference.

The tools if we look at cognitive states in the tickle sites are camera, internet, car, and Van Der Sloot home. The issue reminds me of the death of Princess Diana where the desired photographs of her death in the car were fed to media brokered over the internet. In my mind has always been did someone make a headline that morning, but that is sidetracking. The point is that in making pictures for whatever reason this does not stop in persons traits as a signature. I think Deepak is the camera man on the tickle sites and is the uploader of images because of the technology he has and had at his disposal. That is why in statements as 'through away' words he has used past tense and the term 'goodie two shoes'. I would in this case be looking for shoes as a word of two and shoes. It strikes a cord and in coming into visual sensory memory banks he has used a phrase to evade saying the words he does not want to say.

If there is a disc of images it will most likely have been posted as cd. But as Deepak was online I am surmising the importance was the processing of digital camera images as it does not make sense in what is past behaviour. Now in addictive traits that are AOD's as exhibited consider also the 'salient wanting' of entrapment. In having a subserviant, compliant object that is human the mind engages on control. We all know of the experiment where senior officers were made both jailer and imprisoned. In less than five minutes the play acting turned sinister and even mild none 'wanting' brains fed on neurochemical charges and sparked off a frenzy in the others in that control group.

In rounding up, the sex with a prone person captured with no method of escape and the actions on that person are a time warp and have to be captured to relive the experience. If in a real scenario this behaviour had been part of sensation seeking in AOD and other addictive performances then the group who viewed what went on would seek to record this as a premeditated act of 'high jinks' in contrast to criminal acts. This is status empowerment same as graffiti is unlawful in the lower classes but not in public school vandalism as same crime. One is covered by money and power, the other is generalization of inner city poor and societal norms.

I hope this gives some real examples of what is really factual in behaviours that person exhibit as themselves as 'norms'. I therefore think the fbi should look in the safety boxes of persons of interest for such hardcopies just in case.
[/b]

.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #549 11/27 - 11/28/2006
Post by: 2NJSons_Mom on November 27, 2006, 05:47:14 PM
Quote from: "dkpen"
Fantasy's Integral Role

"The serial killer, much like the chronic gambler and problem drinker, is addicted to the use fantasy."

Addiction's purpose is that of a coping devise. It becomes the method by which the addice can "manage and magically control multiple forms of anxiety".

Addiction is a progressive disease.

"Simply put, it gets worse."

The similarities between sexual addiction, for example, and gambling addiction, and alcoholism, are greater than one would expect.  :?


We were told by a friend long ago that his addiction to gambling was fueled by alchohol.  When he went through therapy, he had to deal with both and must now, refrain from both to stay clean.   They are all linked.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #549 11/27 - 11/28/2006
Post by: memphis on November 27, 2006, 05:53:19 PM
Quote from: "AZLady"
Hi Monkeys.  Just taking a break now from grading argumentative essays (ugh) and checking in.  Lots of talk and interest now in what will happen next.  The ball is in the Dutch investigator's court now.


 :shock: Are you an English teacher?!

If so, no wonder your posts are so communicative.  :wink:   Also, how very sweet of you to not act as the grammar police.  :lol:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #549 11/27 - 11/28/2006
Post by: AZLady on November 27, 2006, 05:59:36 PM
Memphis, yes, I'm an English teacher.     I've been found out!   :lol:  No, I would never grammar police anyone as they would have every right to scrutinize me in return.  I do think what Hammer has posted is significant.  In rereading Dutch Lady's post, I wonder if all this publicity has deprived Joran of his cherished token(s) from the crime.  Perhaps Daddy has made sure they either do not exist or are not in Joran's possession.  If true, Joran may have created his own token by superimposing his image into the picture of Natalee.  It seems the images he chose are very telling and might remind him of that fateful night.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #549 11/27 - 11/28/2006
Post by: AZLady on November 27, 2006, 06:01:45 PM
Any word yet on whether the transcript of de Vries' show has been posted?  I can't wait to read it.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #549 11/27 - 11/28/2006
Post by: AZLady on November 27, 2006, 06:06:00 PM
Just musing here... we all know Joran displays psychopathic behavior and most of us agree that he is a lunatic murderer with possible addictions to gambling, alcohol, and pornography.  Nice picture, eh?  I'm wondering what effects the pressure of de Vries show and the Dutch investigation are having on him.  He's not been particularly successful in school, if he's even in school anymore, and he's not working that we know.  For an unstable person, this sounds like a tremendous amount of pressure.  I hope the Sloots are monitoring their other sons closely and not leaving them alone with Joran--very dangerous.  He's going to break soon.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #549 11/27 - 11/28/2006
Post by: Buckeye on November 27, 2006, 06:07:38 PM
None posted that, at the time of the original picture posting, a university ID was required by facebook.  Yes, wang +, posted the picts, but maybe Joran (the university student) got them and then cleaned his computer.  Daniel might know this.

Friends of my brother, in Amsterdam, emailed me their take (and they knew nothing about the case), that their impression is that the DA, parents, etc, are covering for Joran because they went to his house for more cocaine, she overdosed, it was too late for the hospital....so they don't want to ruin Joran's life because it won't bring Natalee back.  I, of course, brought them up to speed.....but I'm concerned that others might have that impression.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #549 11/27 - 11/28/2006
Post by: klaasend on November 27, 2006, 06:11:25 PM
Quote from: "AZLady"
Any word yet on whether the transcript of de Vries' show has been posted?  I can't wait to read it.


In our De Vries thread I've posted a translation of part of the first 1/2 that was posted on another site (FOB).  Mostly just background stuff we already knew.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #549 11/27 - 11/28/2006
Post by: LilPuma on November 27, 2006, 06:23:21 PM
Quote from: "San"
Quote from: "dkpen"
I don't think the Kalpoes are directly involved in Natalees demise but indirectly involved by association, after the fact. Oh they may of been involved in the act of rape, but not her death.

I believe Deepak knows a LOT more than he is telling. Satish knows something but I don't think he knows everything. Hince why Deepak wants to keep his younger brother out of it.

Joran is directly involved with Natalees demise and directly involved with her disappearance. Same goes with Paulus. He is directly involved with her disappearance.

What stands out in my mind is when Beth asked Deepak "Did you help her Deepak".  He stood there motionless.  Deepak and Satish were present when Natalee was severely harmed.  Satish would have never asked his brother how is the girl.


I think Beth said Deepak just looked at the ground when she asked that.  As for Satish asking how the girl was doing, even if he didn't ask that question of Deepak Monday, putting it in the statement tells us the Kalpoes knew Natalee was in trouble the night before.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #549 11/27 - 11/28/2006
Post by: memphis on November 27, 2006, 06:29:55 PM
Quote from: "AZLady"
Memphis, yes, I'm an English teacher.     I've been found out!   :lol:  No, I would never grammar police anyone as they would have every right to scrutinize me in return.  I do think what Hammer has posted is significant.  In rereading Dutch Lady's post, I wonder if all this publicity has deprived Joran of his cherished token(s) from the crime.  Perhaps Daddy has made sure they either do not exist or are not in Joran's possession.  If true, Joran may have created his own token by superimposing his image into the picture of Natalee.  It seems the images he chose are very telling and might remind him of that fateful night.


Remember I told you I enjoyed reading your posts.  :wink:  You seem to convey exactly what you intended.

Yes, Hammer posted some good stuff. I've been trying to wade through that last Dutch Lady post. It's not exactly an easy read.  :D  

Does anyone know Dutch Lady's background? Was it psychologoy?


Title: Lively Case Discussion #549 11/27 - 11/28/2006
Post by: LilPuma on November 27, 2006, 06:31:52 PM
Quote from: "nonesuche"

I am worse than you about Greta, I regret that Joran didn't trouble to make a photoshopped photo of he and Greta, with her swooning over him for posterity  :roll:


 :lol:  :lol:  :lol:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #549 11/27 - 11/28/2006
Post by: LilPuma on November 27, 2006, 06:35:13 PM
Klaas?  Don't know if I missed an earlier post on this, but do we have numbers for access to this site from Aruba during and after the De Vries show?


Title: Lively Case Discussion #549 11/27 - 11/28/2006
Post by: dkpen on November 27, 2006, 06:38:51 PM
I think the whole lost of Aruba has ASPD.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #549 11/27 - 11/28/2006
Post by: Shizaru on November 27, 2006, 06:39:34 PM
From the tscript in DeVries thread:  

 
Quote

The night before her disappearance Natalee started drinking alcohol at 10 am in the morning and had to be carried back to her hotel room at night by her roommates/friends.


Lee's statement was that Natalee was "escorted" back to her room by one person.  Not carried by a group of people.  Why did the program feel the need to exaggerate here?


Title: Lively Case Discussion #549 11/27 - 11/28/2006
Post by: klaasend on November 27, 2006, 06:39:54 PM
Quote from: "LilPuma"
Klaas?  Don't know if I missed an earlier post on this, but do we have numbers for access to this site from Aruba during and after the De Vries show?

No, I was too busy to look.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #549 11/27 - 11/28/2006
Post by: klaasend on November 27, 2006, 06:41:15 PM
Quote from: "Shizaru"
From the tscript in DeVries thread:  

 
Quote

The night before her disappearance Natalee started drinking alcohol at 10 am in the morning and had to be carried back to her hotel room at night by her roommates/friends.


Lee's statement was that Natalee was "escorted" back to her room by one person.  Not carried by a group of people.  Why did the program feel the need to exaggerate here?


Shizaru - don't forget this is being translated from Dutch to English.  I think it's just something in the translation.  I wouldn't make that much of it.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #549 11/27 - 11/28/2006
Post by: Tylergal on November 27, 2006, 06:43:06 PM
Quote from: "the big hammer"
Antonio Carlo

The conscience-plagued sloot attorney seems to have had second thoughts about his role in covering up a murder, and his own culpability, if his deviant and psychologically-tortured client happens to harm another girl.

The exchange descibed by De Vreis between Jannsen and Carlo, where Carlo evidently approached Jannsen w/ relevant information about the case, and indicates he is aware that jvds bears criminal responsibility for Natalee's disappearance (murder, rape, etc).  

This is strange indeed.  And borders on legal malpractice which could void any judgement against jvds in the future.  And what does Jannsen do?  She attempts to broker further info and Carlo says she'll have to find the "evidence" herself.  And where do we end up?

Nowhere.  Right where we were.

De Vreis attempts to interview Carlo re: these strange events, and Antonio does what all Dutch Arubans do best: he deflects and then runs away.

IMO, the De Vreis show accomplished much in terms of informing and educating Dutch audiences about the events surrounding the murder of Natalee.

I think one of the things accomplished also was the destruction of Karin Jannsen's career.  She deserves it, and verily so, for her base and incompetent handling of this case, and by leading the false arrests of the security guards.

De Vreis should get this incompetent and dangerous woman ( who actually had the temerity and gall to write in a letter to the US Dept of Justice inquiring whether Beth Holloway Twitty was directly related to Adolph Hitler ) on his show next for a detailed interview.  

Her record in this case should be broadcast, as warning to people everywhere who want or need to know the state of jurisprudence in the place formerly known as Aruba.

.


I am beginning to believe now that she, not the package itself, is the poison from the Hague.  I do know that she was there contorting her body in order to pat herself on the back when she was supposedly taking evidence to the Hague.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #549 11/27 - 11/28/2006
Post by: shadow on November 27, 2006, 06:44:19 PM
Quote from: "the big hammer"
Antonio Carlo

The conscience-plagued sloot attorney seems to have had second thoughts about his role in covering up a murder, and his own culpability, if his deviant and psychologically-tortured client happens to harm another girl.

The exchange descibed by De Vreis between Jannsen and Carlo, where Carlo evidently approached Jannsen w/ relevant information about the case, and indicates he is aware that jvds bears criminal responsibility for Natalee's disappearance (murder, rape, etc).  

This is strange indeed.  And borders on legal malpractice which could void any judgement against jvds in the future.  And what does Jannsen do?  She attempts to broker further info and Carlo says she'll have to find the "evidence" herself.  And where do we end up?

Nowhere.  Right where we were.

De Vreis attempts to interview Carlo re: these strange events, and Antonio does what all Dutch Arubans do best: he deflects and then runs away.

IMO, the De Vreis show accomplished much in terms of informing and educating Dutch audiences about the events surrounding the murder of Natalee.

I think one of the things accomplished also was the destruction of Karin Jannsen's career.  She deserves it, and verily so, for her base and incompetent handling of this case, and by leading the false arrests of the security guards.

De Vreis should get this incompetent and dangerous woman ( who actually had the temerity and gall to write in a letter to the US Dept of Justice inquiring whether Beth Holloway Twitty was directly related to Adolph Hitler ) on his show next for a detailed interview.  

Her record in this case should be broadcast, as warning to people everywhere who want or need to know the state of jurisprudence in the place formerly known as Aruba.

.


I agree 100%. and as far as . . .
Dutchlady on Trophy-Taking
From Scared Monkeys September 21, 2005:
IMO the video or images were taken and shared, but not shared via the internet, but via portable hard drive. I still feel there is a connection to Miami. Can anyone confirm that Paulus traveled to Miami shortly after the disapearance of Natalee? Maybe he is the Miami connection . . . anyone know if he traveled to Miami frequently?

I also have a supicsion regarding Satish and D not wanting him involved.

Evening Monkeys! :)


Title: Lively Case Discussion #549 11/27 - 11/28/2006
Post by: shadow on November 27, 2006, 06:47:05 PM
Quote from: "klaasend"
Quote from: "AZLady"
Any word yet on whether the transcript of de Vries' show has been posted?  I can't wait to read it.


In our De Vries thread I've posted a translation of part of the first 1/2 that was posted on another site (FOB).  Mostly just background stuff we already knew.


Thank you Klass! :)


Title: Lively Case Discussion #549 11/27 - 11/28/2006
Post by: yapperz1 on November 27, 2006, 06:48:24 PM
Evening Monkeys

There was a post in early July by someone who had just returned from Aruba. This person claims they saw Paulus at the airport in Aruba as they were leaving the island.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #549 11/27 - 11/28/2006
Post by: Shizaru on November 27, 2006, 06:50:10 PM
Quote from: "klaasend"
Quote from: "Shizaru"
From the tscript in DeVries thread:  

 
Quote

The night before her disappearance Natalee started drinking alcohol at 10 am in the morning and had to be carried back to her hotel room at night by her roommates/friends.


Lee's statement was that Natalee was "escorted" back to her room by one person.  Not carried by a group of people.  Why did the program feel the need to exaggerate here?


Shizaru - don't forget this is being translated from Dutch to English.  I think it's just something in the translation.  I wouldn't make that much of it.


Maybe, let's see how Ramm translates it.    

Of course the big question re: the DeVries program is why the ****  is it that they couldn't give Natalee's family any advance warning about the allegations they were going to make against Natalee (and as of last night weren't responding to inquires from Natalee's family about those allegations), but they could give that information out to an Internet poster over the phone?


Title: Lively Case Discussion #549 11/27 - 11/28/2006
Post by: memphis on November 27, 2006, 06:53:11 PM
Quote from: "Shizaru"
From the tscript in DeVries thread:  

 
Quote

The night before her disappearance Natalee started drinking alcohol at 10 am in the morning and had to be carried back to her hotel room at night by her roommates/friends.


Lee's statement was that Natalee was "escorted" back to her room by one person.  Not carried by a group of people.  Why did the program feel the need to exaggerate here?


Shizaru, I saw a post where Ramm at BFN (I think) later corrected the "carried" part to "escorted".


Title: Lively Case Discussion #549 11/27 - 11/28/2006
Post by: LilPuma on November 27, 2006, 06:55:53 PM
Quote from: "Sue"
Quote from: "dkpen"
You know with this picture of Joran and Natalee is disturbing to me. I can't get it out of my head. ugh!

Taking or making of souviners from or of the victim(s) is evidence of fantasy at work.  Joran has major issues.

GET THE BOY HELP NOW ANITA! Please, before another girl falls victim to your ill-begotten son.



she cant help her boy... she cant help herself


I've often wondered about Anita:  
A.  Is she covering for Joran and Paulus, knowing full well what they do, what kind of men they really are?  

B.  Does she "know" but not really know, and is in denial?  

C.  Is she truly clueless, believing her men are innocent of all charges?


Title: Lively Case Discussion #549 11/27 - 11/28/2006
Post by: dkpen on November 27, 2006, 07:00:39 PM
Quote from: "LilPuma"
Quote from: "Sue"
Quote from: "dkpen"
You know with this picture of Joran and Natalee is disturbing to me. I can't get it out of my head. ugh!

Taking or making of souviners from or of the victim(s) is evidence of fantasy at work.  Joran has major issues.

GET THE BOY HELP NOW ANITA! Please, before another girl falls victim to your ill-begotten son.



she cant help her boy... she cant help herself


I've often wondered about Anita:  
A.  Is she covering for Joran and Paulus, knowing full well what they do, what kind of men they really are?  

B.  Does she "know" but not really know, and is in denial?  

C.  Is she truly clueless, believing her men are innocent of all charges?


B.  Does she "know" but not really know, and is in denial?  

I have to agree with B.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #549 11/27 - 11/28/2006
Post by: memphis on November 27, 2006, 07:00:44 PM
Quote from: "memphis"
Quote from: "Shizaru"
From the tscript in DeVries thread:  

 
Quote

The night before her disappearance Natalee started drinking alcohol at 10 am in the morning and had to be carried back to her hotel room at night by her roommates/friends.


Lee's statement was that Natalee was "escorted" back to her room by one person.  Not carried by a group of people.  Why did the program feel the need to exaggerate here?


Shizaru, I saw a post where Ramm at BFN (I think) later corrected the "carried" part to "escorted".


I'm trying to find it...


Title: Lively Case Discussion #549 11/27 - 11/28/2006
Post by: Tylergal on November 27, 2006, 07:03:31 PM
Quote from: "LilPuma"
Quote from: "Sue"
Quote from: "dkpen"
You know with this picture of Joran and Natalee is disturbing to me. I can't get it out of my head. ugh!

Taking or making of souviners from or of the victim(s) is evidence of fantasy at work.  Joran has major issues.

GET THE BOY HELP NOW ANITA! Please, before another girl falls victim to your ill-begotten son.



she cant help her boy... she cant help herself


I've often wondered about Anita:  
A.  Is she covering for Joran and Paulus, knowing full well what they do, what kind of men they really are?  

B.  Does she "know" but not really know, and is in denial?  

C.  Is she truly clueless, believing her men are innocent of all charges?


Enabler who was called back from Holland to help coordinate stories, enabler of the first degree.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #549 11/27 - 11/28/2006
Post by: Tylergal on November 27, 2006, 07:05:30 PM
Anita knows all and makes the stories as she can be objective.  She is the one who has given them the stories to tell.  Why else would she call on Freddy to help her?  Because she knows Joran will not tell her the truth and she wanted Paulus and Joran out of the room so she could hear everything; thus, she could help them coordinate the stories.  If Joran is the spawn of Satan, what does that make Anita?


Title: Lively Case Discussion #549 11/27 - 11/28/2006
Post by: LilPuma on November 27, 2006, 07:10:25 PM
Quote from: "Sue"

I really want to be a FLY on the wall of the investigators
in Holland that have taken over the case.. I really wonder
what they are thinking and what exactly they are doing
if anything


DeVries timing on this was perfect.  Hopefully, if anyone wanted to just stamp it Cold Case and forgetaboutit, this show will have given them some info and motivation not to do so.  (Now that I know we have an English teacher, I changed "not to" to "not to do so."  That's better, right?)   :wink:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #549 11/27 - 11/28/2006
Post by: klaasend on November 27, 2006, 07:11:01 PM
Here is a portion of the De Vries show made available by Daniel at FOB - you should be able to just click on the image and it will play:

(http://i37.photobucket.com/albums/e82/klaasend2/th_devries-joran.jpg) (http://s37.photobucket.com/albums/e82/klaasend2/?action=view&current=devries-joran.flv)


Title: Thanks
Post by: IBE on November 27, 2006, 07:16:47 PM
Thanks Hammer for bringing Dutchlady back in.

It's too bad we couldn't raise the $$ for her, for she wished to go to Aruba to solve the case. Has anyone heard from her or about what she is doing now?

I remember following her, Anna, Aruba girl and many others who are still dedicated on this post. I followed them from Rheil World (sp) very early on and also in some travel site.

We must never give up until Natalee has come home in all sense of the word.

Keep up the Good Works, Monkeys! through thick and thin.

IBE


Title: Lively Case Discussion #549 11/27 - 11/28/2006
Post by: LilPuma on November 27, 2006, 07:17:25 PM
Quote from: "Tylergal"
Anita knows all and makes the stories as she can be objective.  She is the one who has given them the stories to tell.  Why else would she call on Freddy to help her?  Because she knows Joran will not tell her the truth and she wanted Paulus and Joran out of the room so she could hear everything; thus, she could help them coordinate the stories.  If Joran is the spawn of Satan, what does that make Anita?


I think Anita's in denial.  She knows what her boys are up to but can't deal with it.  Now she has Beth to blame, so life is better.   :shock: I haven't read the translation yet but did Jacobs really call Joran the Devil?    :lol:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #549 11/27 - 11/28/2006
Post by: memphis on November 27, 2006, 07:18:15 PM
Klaas, the screen capture of Joran's and Kee's exchange is amazing.

Anyone, do you know when those pictures of Natalee and her friends were first posted at RU?

I'm reading Daniel's posts over at FOB.  :shock:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #549 11/27 - 11/28/2006
Post by: Buckeye on November 27, 2006, 07:18:55 PM
Klaas

Looks like you'll have to change the peeping through the blinds picture to the peeping through the curtains.. :lol:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #549 11/27 - 11/28/2006
Post by: klaasend on November 27, 2006, 07:21:33 PM
Quote from: "Buckeye"
Klaas

Looks like you'll have to change the peeping through the blinds picture to the peeping through the curtains.. :lol:


 :lol:  :lol: That's the first thing I thought of when I saw that too!!  :lol:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #549 11/27 - 11/28/2006
Post by: klaasend on November 27, 2006, 07:23:09 PM
Quote from: "memphis"
Klaas, the screen capture of Joran's and Kee's exchange is amazing.

Anyone, do you know when those pictures of Natalee and her friends were first posted at RU?

I'm reading Daniel's posts over at FOB.  :shock:

Others may remember better than I but I believe it was around the same time,  January 2006.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #549 11/27 - 11/28/2006
Post by: memphis on November 27, 2006, 07:23:14 PM
The following is from FOB....

Posted: Mon Nov 27th, 2006 08:56 am  
 
MoonShadows wrote:
de Vries implied Joran tried to "create false evidence" of a previous relationship with Natalee with the picture.  It seems that's what Daniel is implying as well.  


Daniel wrote: I don't think it was intended as evidence of anything in particular.

De Vries does not know why that photoshop job was done, or he would have used that information in his show.

Note that the original photo of Natalee and her girlfriend was not in wide circulation on the net yet when Joran had it photoshopped on Jan 25/26 of this year. Only a very small circle of trusted people had it.


I'm trying to get my mind around the implications here.  :shock:


Title: Earrings
Post by: IBE on November 27, 2006, 07:24:09 PM
On of the Monkeys mentioned that the earrings on Natalee we missing in Joran's photoshopped picture.

Would this have any psychological implications or wasn't there an earring supposedly shown to the mom?

Memory is vague. Help please?

I seem to remember a discussion of the earrings was important early on.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #549 11/27 - 11/28/2006
Post by: klaasend on November 27, 2006, 07:24:44 PM
Quote from: "memphis"
The following is from FOB....

Posted: Mon Nov 27th, 2006 08:56 am  
 
MoonShadows wrote:
de Vries implied Joran tried to "create false evidence" of a previous relationship with Natalee with the picture.  It seems that's what Daniel is implying as well.  


Daniel wrote: I don't think it was intended as evidence of anything in particular.

De Vries does not know why that photoshop job was done, or he would have used that information in his show.

Note that the original photo of Natalee and her girlfriend was not in wide circulation on the net yet when Joran had it photoshopped on Jan 25/26 of this year. Only a very small circle of trusted people had it.


I'm trying to get my mind around the implications here.  :shock:

If I remember correctly, it was Stinkeypete that posted those photos from the MB kids facebook accounts.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #549 11/27 - 11/28/2006
Post by: Buckeye on November 27, 2006, 07:25:57 PM
Since we know Joran had some type of therapy....I am sure that Anita was well informed of his disorder.  It doesn't take a rocket scientist to figure it out.  The FBI, Dutch behaviorists and even Dompig nailed it.  Yes, Anita knew before all the rest.  She may have ignored it or assisted in covering his bad behavior....but she wasn't ignorant.  IMO


Title: CD's
Post by: IBE on November 27, 2006, 07:28:12 PM
In regard to the discussion about hard drives and dissimination of information...

Remember Anna's comments about the lack of info from the hard drive company that "looked" at Joran's hard drive?

Also a CD is much quicker to disminate info... can be mailed or hand given, thus no "digital trail" per se.

Too bad none of the police checked the hard disk drives at the Internet Cafe or conveniently "forgot" to check???


Title: Lively Case Discussion #549 11/27 - 11/28/2006
Post by: Ono on November 27, 2006, 07:37:44 PM
Quote from: "San"
Quote from: "robots"
monsters like joran do things like the picture thing because they THINK they are UNTOUCHABLE


so did CAPONE  8)


didnt capone die in PRISON


While at Alcatraz, he exhibited signs of syphilitic dementia. Capone spent the rest of his felony sentence in the hospital. On January 6, 1939, his prison term expired and he was transferred to Terminal Island, a Federal Correctional Institution in California, to serve his one-year misdemeanor sentence. He was finally released on November 16, 1939, but still had to pay fines and court costs of $37,617.51.

After his release, Capone spent a short time in the hospital. He returned to his home in Palm Island where the rest of his life was relaxed and quiet. His mind and body continued to deteriorate so that he could no longer run the outfit. On January 21, 1947, he had an apoplectic stoke that was probably unrelated to his syphilis. He regained consciousness and began to improve until pneumonia set in on January 24. He died the next day from cardiac arrest. Capone was first buried in Mount Olivet Cemetery in Chicago's far South Side between the graves of his father, Gabriele, and brother, Frank, but in March of 1950 the remains of all three were moved to Mount Carmel Cemetery on the far West Side.


But they "got" Capone on tax evasion and that is why he was imprisioned....not because of all of his dastardly deeds.  I have always wondered why Joran, etc. was not charged and surely could have been convicted with kidnapping.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #549 11/27 - 11/28/2006
Post by: memphis on November 27, 2006, 07:39:27 PM
This is a screen capture from the show....

(http://i35.photobucket.com/albums/d155/memphi/devries-nat-4.jpg)


and this is a translation by HannieC....


The first picture has to be used. And the guy in the second, third, fourth, or fifth has to be placed in the first picture ( You can choose which one is the easiest to use) The best would be if this one would be pasted onto that girl ( so that that girl who`s standing on the left in the first pic is not seen anymore, if that isn`t really possible, than you have to put this guy just over her)
If that looks believable, and they buy it,than i will make sure you`ll get €200,-- from Kees.
If it isn`t possible, than we can let this guy make a picture that he fits in excactly,
but we don`t have a lot of time.

Thanks,.....( looks like---> and if you have any questions), you can call Kees, or mail me back


Title: Lively Case Discussion #549 11/27 - 11/28/2006
Post by: Tylergal on November 27, 2006, 07:40:25 PM
Quote from: "memphis"
The following is from FOB....

Posted: Mon Nov 27th, 2006 08:56 am  
 
MoonShadows wrote:
de Vries implied Joran tried to "create false evidence" of a previous relationship with Natalee with the picture.  It seems that's what Daniel is implying as well.  


Daniel wrote: I don't think it was intended as evidence of anything in particular.

De Vries does not know why that photoshop job was done, or he would have used that information in his show.

Note that the original photo of Natalee and her girlfriend was not in wide circulation on the net yet when Joran had it photoshopped on Jan 25/26 of this year. Only a very small circle of trusted people had it.


I'm trying to get my mind around the implications here.  :shock:


the small circle of friends could be those at RU who illegally obtained the photo via the face books, and it was pretty early in January, if memory serves.  I would be willing to bet Nonesuche has the dates on that.  Is someone implying that Joran got these pictures or they were obtained from Joran from others?  It is likely that someone who illegally obtained these photographs "relayed" them to Joran.


Title: Re: Earrings
Post by: Tylergal on November 27, 2006, 07:41:44 PM
Quote from: "IBE"
On of the Monkeys mentioned that the earrings on Natalee we missing in Joran's photoshopped picture.

Would this have any psychological implications or wasn't there an earring supposedly shown to the mom?

Memory is vague. Help please?

I seem to remember a discussion of the earrings was important early on.


If that is the case, I would say he either took the earrings as a souvenir or that during a confrontation they were ripped from her ears.  Speaking of stealing the gold from your dead mother's teeth. . .


Title: Lively Case Discussion #549 11/27 - 11/28/2006
Post by: Ono on November 27, 2006, 07:42:49 PM
Quote from: "the big hammer"
Antonio Carlo

The conscience-plagued sloot attorney seems to have had second thoughts about his role in covering up a murder, and his own culpability, if his deviant and psychologically-tortured client happens to harm another girl.

The exchange descibed by De Vreis between Jannsen and Carlo, where Carlo evidently approached Jannsen w/ relevant information about the case, and indicates he is aware that jvds bears criminal responsibility for Natalee's disappearance (murder, rape, etc).  

This is strange indeed.  And borders on legal malpractice which could void any judgement against jvds in the future.  And what does Jannsen do?  She attempts to broker further info and Carlo says she'll have to find the "evidence" herself.  And where do we end up?

Nowhere.  Right where we were.

De Vreis attempts to interview Carlo re: these strange events, and Antonio does what all Dutch Arubans do best: he deflects and then runs away.

IMO, the De Vreis show accomplished much in terms of informing and educating Dutch audiences about the events surrounding the murder of Natalee.

I think one of the things accomplished also was the destruction of Karin Jannsen's career.  She deserves it, and verily so, for her base and incompetent handling of this case, and by leading the false arrests of the security guards.

De Vreis should get this incompetent and dangerous woman ( who actually had the temerity and gall to write in a letter to the US Dept of Justice inquiring whether Beth Holloway Twitty was directly related to Adolph Hitler ) on his show next for a detailed interview.  

Her record in this case should be broadcast, as warning to people everywhere who want or need to know the state of jurisprudence in the place formerly known as Aruba.

.


Hammer: So very well stated (as always) ...I agree.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #549 11/27 - 11/28/2006
Post by: Tylergal on November 27, 2006, 07:43:58 PM
Quote from: "Buckeye"
Since we know Joran had some type of therapy....I am sure that Anita was well informed of his disorder.  It doesn't take a rocket scientist to figure it out.  The FBI, Dutch behaviorists and even Dompig nailed it.  Yes, Anita knew before all the rest.  She may have ignored it or assisted in covering his bad behavior....but she wasn't ignorant.  IMO


I absolutely agree.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #549 11/27 - 11/28/2006
Post by: Ono on November 27, 2006, 07:49:39 PM
Quote from: "robots"
JANNSEN is in BED with PAULUS





i know i know i know


after you read the above statement please feel free to take a LONG HOT SHOWER to get rid of the GROSS feeling while your imagination goes HAY WIRE  :twisted:


Well...I've always wondered if that was actually & literally true. And have also wondered if they were deeply and heavily involved in a passionate lover's tryst the night that Natalee was harmed.  I've wondered that, as well as wondering, if indeed, Paulus was also one of those sexually attacking a helpless Natalee at his home. It's a toss up.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #549 11/27 - 11/28/2006
Post by: memphis on November 27, 2006, 07:50:03 PM
Daniel thinks Joran sent the email and copied himself.

Where is everyone?


Title: Lively Case Discussion #549 11/27 - 11/28/2006
Post by: San on November 27, 2006, 07:52:23 PM
Quote from: "LilPuma"
Quote from: "Sue"
Quote from: "dkpen"
You know with this picture of Joran and Natalee is disturbing to me. I can't get it out of my head. ugh!

Taking or making of souviners from or of the victim(s) is evidence of fantasy at work.  Joran has major issues.

GET THE BOY HELP NOW ANITA! Please, before another girl falls victim to your ill-begotten son.



she cant help her boy... she cant help herself


I've often wondered about Anita:  
A.  Is she covering for Joran and Paulus, knowing full well what they do, what kind of men they really are?  

B.  Does she "know" but not really know, and is in denial?  

C.  Is she truly clueless, believing her men are innocent of all charges?

Anita knows exactly what they are and knows the whole story.  Those tears we saw are only because they got caught.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #549 11/27 - 11/28/2006
Post by: robots on November 27, 2006, 07:53:18 PM
Quote from: "Ono"
Quote from: "robots"
JANNSEN is in BED with PAULUS





i know i know i know


after you read the above statement please feel free to take a LONG HOT SHOWER to get rid of the GROSS feeling while your imagination goes HAY WIRE  :twisted:


Well...I've always wondered if that was actually & literally true. And have also wondered if they were deeply and heavily involved in a passionate lover's tryst the night that Natalee was harmed.  I've wondered that, as well as wondering, if indeed, Paulus was also one of those sexually attacking a helpless Natalee at his home. It's a toss up.




yep


Title: Lively Case Discussion #549 11/27 - 11/28/2006
Post by: robots on November 27, 2006, 07:54:03 PM
Quote from: "memphis"
Daniel thinks Joran sent the email and copied himself.

Where is everyone?



hmmmmmmmmmmmm


Title: Lively Case Discussion #549 11/27 - 11/28/2006
Post by: memphis on November 27, 2006, 07:56:54 PM
Did Joran hack into the MySpace account himself and get the pics?

(email is hackers_rule@hotmaill.com)

I'm really not sure what this means, but I think it is big.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #549 11/27 - 11/28/2006
Post by: klaasend on November 27, 2006, 07:57:05 PM
Posted/translated by Tjeerd at FOB:

http://misdaadjournalist.web-log.nl/

(http://misdaadjournalist.web-log.nl/misdaadjournalist/images/joransbs1375_2.jpg)
(http://misdaadjournalist.web-log.nl/misdaadjournalist/images/nataleedevries1.jpg)

Dagboek van maandag 27 november (Diary of Monday 27 November)


 "Joran van der Sloot is ziek". ("Joran vd Sloot  is ill") Uiteindelijk is deze uitspraak van een van zijn beste vrienden de kern van de hele uitzending van gisteravond, van Peter de Vries, over de zaak Natalee Holloway. (Eventually this is a statement of one of Joran's best friends the core of the whole programme of yesterday, of PdV, about the case Natalee Holloway) Ik vind het overtuigend. ( I find it convincing) Ik dacht eerst ook dat een normale jongen van zeventien die je aan strenge politieverhoren onderwerpt, wel door zal slaan (First I also  thought .a normal boy of seventeen who is confronted to heavy police interviews will squeal)  Maar Joran is niet zo normaal. (But Joran is not so normal)Ik had destijds ook al wat twijfels bij die rare website van hem, maar dat hij en zijn vader zo doortrapt zouden zijn als ze nu werden afgeschilderd kon ik toen nog niet bevroeden (I had then some doubts about his strange website of his, but that he and his father would be so wicked as they are now depicted I could not have predicted). Wel vreemd dat al die Amerikaanse verslaggevers niks zinnigs boven water wisten te krijgen, hoe professioneel zijn die Amerikaanse journalisten eigenlijk? Of hebben ze hier alleen hun sensatiepoot voor laten uitrukken? (Quite strange all these American journalists could find nothing useful really, how professional are these American journalists? Or have they only sent their sensation section? )

Ik ben ook erg benieuwd wat Revu-collega Zvetzana, die bezig is met een boek over de affaire, van de uitzending vindt. ( I am very anxious what Revu collegae Zvetzana who writes a book on this affair thinks of the programme)Zij heeft veel contact gehad met de familie Van der Sloot. (She has had much contact with the family Van der Sloot) Ik heb haar inmiddels even gebeld en uiteraard heeft ze met veel interesse gekeken, maar ze mag er niks over zeggen, van de uitgever.(I have phoned her today and she watched it with much interest but she is not supposed to say anything because of the publisher) Off the record hebben we nog wel wat gebabbeld, dat blijft uiteraard onder de pet.(Off the reccord we have chatted a bit but I will say nothing ) Haar boek komt in april uit (Her book will appear in April). Foto rechts: de gemanipuleerde foto die Joran van zichzelf en Natalee liet maken en waaruit zou moeten blijken dat hij bij Natalee thuis is geweest. (Photo right: the manipulated picture which Joran had made of himself and Natalee and which had to appear as if he had been at Natalee's place)

Comment by Tjeerd:

What is this all about? This man is supposed to be an crime expert?? This is  pathetic!!! I think De Vries tries to change public opinion indeed....

Tomorrow I will mail this Korterink what this is all about....


Title: Lively Case Discussion #549 11/27 - 11/28/2006
Post by: Buckeye on November 27, 2006, 08:04:09 PM
Can the Netherlands encumber the money Joran might get from a book until the case goes to trial??


Title: Lively Case Discussion #549 11/27 - 11/28/2006
Post by: klaasend on November 27, 2006, 08:04:11 PM
Posted on the front page of SM by Maarten:

Joran is living in a student house in Zevenaar, near to Arnhem, The Netherlands. He don’t speak to the press, has to hide something in my opinion.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #549 11/27 - 11/28/2006
Post by: lexie on November 27, 2006, 08:15:50 PM
I have been thinking about this photoshopped pic.  What could have been the possible reason for paying so much to have a picture of himself at Natleee's house?  And the timing of it.....  The only thing I can think of is that he was possibly going to turn it over to the publisher of his book.... an effort to clear himself?  How could such an obvious forgery be taken seriously by anyone??  

Any other ideas about why he would want such a picture?


Title: Lively Case Discussion #549 11/27 - 11/28/2006
Post by: Kat_Gram on November 27, 2006, 08:17:26 PM
Quote from: "Buckeye"
Can the Netherlands encumber the money Joran might get from a book until the case goes to trial??

I don't know what their laws are. When it was announced that he was going to write a book, the family , I hope would work thru JQK.
Using images of Natalee, would that be legal ?


Title: Pict request
Post by: IBE on November 27, 2006, 08:20:33 PM
Klaas,

Again, thank you for all of your hard work and dedication!

Would you please provide the link to the photoshopped = cropped pict of Joran in the Twitty's home?

I'd like to see if it has earrings or not.

TYIA

IBE


Title: Lively Case Discussion #549 11/27 - 11/28/2006
Post by: robots on November 27, 2006, 08:21:38 PM
he would tell his NON INFORMED friends he knew natalee from years ago

they were old pals

he would never hurt her


"see, i even have pictures when i visited her house a couple years ago"


stupid friends would believe the DELICIOUS JORAN  8)


Title: Lively Case Discussion #549 11/27 - 11/28/2006
Post by: Carnut on November 27, 2006, 08:23:47 PM
Quote from: "San"
Quote from: "LilPuma"
Quote from: "Sue"
Quote from: "dkpen"
You know with this picture of Joran and Natalee is disturbing to me. I can't get it out of my head. ugh!

Taking or making of souviners from or of the victim(s) is evidence of fantasy at work.  Joran has major issues.

GET THE BOY HELP NOW ANITA! Please, before another girl falls victim to your ill-begotten son.



she cant help her boy... she cant help herself


I've often wondered about Anita:  
A.  Is she covering for Joran and Paulus, knowing full well what they do, what kind of men they really are?  

B.  Does she "know" but not really know, and is in denial?  

C.  Is she truly clueless, believing her men are innocent of all charges?

Anita knows exactly what they are and knows the whole story.  Those tears we saw are only because they got caught.


Heh, heh, Anita isn't just covering for her 'boys', she's running the whole show.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #549 11/27 - 11/28/2006
Post by: Ono on November 27, 2006, 08:24:25 PM
Quote from: "LilPuma"
Quote from: "Sue"
Quote from: "dkpen"
You know with this picture of Joran and Natalee is disturbing to me. I can't get it out of my head. ugh!

Taking or making of souviners from or of the victim(s) is evidence of fantasy at work.  Joran has major issues.

GET THE BOY HELP NOW ANITA! Please, before another girl falls victim to your ill-begotten son.



she cant help her boy... she cant help herself


I've often wondered about Anita:  
A.  Is she covering for Joran and Paulus, knowing full well what they do, what kind of men they really are?  

B.  Does she "know" but not really know, and is in denial?  

C.  Is she truly clueless, believing her men are innocent of all charges?


So far, IMO:
A.   Yes, probably. Desiring to spare HERSELF further hurt.
B.   She knows..and by now, realizes that the son is as devious as the father, and Joran's adult games are far worse than Joran's childhood trespasses which she always had to deal with, as far as other parents' complaints. It's serious stuff now.
C.   She's not clueless, but has tried for years to spare herself further hurt, so she has chosen to ignore Joran's warped personality. Paulus was most likely told that he was now in charge of Joran. Joran probably exhibited his anti-social behavior at a very wee age.  Is that why they moved all the way to Aruba when he was small ????


Title: Lively Case Discussion #549 11/27 - 11/28/2006
Post by: Carnut on November 27, 2006, 08:26:47 PM
Quote from: "lexie"
I have been thinking about this photoshopped pic.  What could have been the possible reason for paying so much to have a picture of himself at Natleee's house?  And the timing of it.....  The only thing I can think of is that he was possibly going to turn it over to the publisher of his book.... an effort to clear himself?  How could such an obvious forgery be taken seriously by anyone??  

Any other ideas about why he would want such a picture?


Looks like you nailed it, it appears the sporter is doing an OJ 'if I did it' book.


Title: Re: Pict request
Post by: klaasend on November 27, 2006, 08:28:43 PM
Quote from: "IBE"
Klaas,

Again, thank you for all of your hard work and dedication!

Would you please provide the link to the photoshopped = cropped pict of Joran in the Twitty's home?

I'd like to see if it has earrings or not.

TYIA

IBE


(http://i14.photobucket.com/albums/a306/klaasend/devries-nat-2-2.jpg)

Original

(http://i14.photobucket.com/albums/a306/klaasend/nat3.jpg)


Title: Lively Case Discussion #549 11/27 - 11/28/2006
Post by: Buckeye on November 27, 2006, 08:32:42 PM
The earring is gone.......... :shock:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #549 11/27 - 11/28/2006
Post by: klaasend on November 27, 2006, 08:33:09 PM
A repost by NYCHIC of an old SM front page post:
here is another one of those cryptic posts:

—————
Uhm up until now there hasn’t been any more person detained.Maybe that was a news mixup.Today Mr Lejuez (not sure who he is representing)adressed a local radio with some other facts.Or potential facts may I say.
Supposedly Joran van der Sloot was crying in his cell where he is held. And he started talking to Jones(one of the security Guards who is also still held).He said that he thinks that the Kalpoe bro’s might be up to something.HE added that it seemed as if they are trying to make it seem like he killed Ms Holloway.So he decided to “confess”.He said that the Kalpoe brothers dropped him off FIRST.At the goobyes he exchanged email information with Ms Holloway and then he got out of the car.Came monday , they decided to tell the police that all 3 of them dropped Ms NAtalee , and invented the entire 2 security guard story.
My question: WHAT THE HELL IS THIS ? Now you want to “confess” again? And without telling a reason WHY the 3 of you had decided to come up with a story?
You’re all guilty..this is guilty behavior.
But the biggest rumor is this; Joran did get out of the car with Ms Natalee(at the lighthouse/arashi beach)… Accidentaly she stumbled at the beach..She fell on rocks where she hit her head pretty hard.And since then passed out.THey dropped her off a far distance from the Holiday Inn.BUt as guilty as they felt came back a few minutes later to check on her.She was still in the same position as when she was dropped off.Then they discovered she still had no pulse and supposed she turned ice cold and purple.SO they all panicked , took her back in the car , and started to plan what to do. That is how much i know of this ‘rumor’. This is sooo sickening.These guys SHOULD be pressured MUCH harder ..Make them soob so hard they can’t even think straight ,so they confess to this. I believe the rumor.This is a shame , as for I am born and raised on this lovely island. And it makes me sick ! This is unfair , no matter how drunk this girl was.It’s utter and completely wrong. May god rest Natalee’s soul..

Posted by: AuA82 at June 13, 2005 04:44 PM


Title: Lively Case Discussion #549 11/27 - 11/28/2006
Post by: Ono on November 27, 2006, 08:36:14 PM
Quote from: "klaasend"
Here is a portion of the De Vries show made available by Daniel at FOB - you should be able to just click on the image and it will play:

(http://i37.photobucket.com/albums/e82/klaasend2/th_devries-joran.jpg) (http://s37.photobucket.com/albums/e82/klaasend2/?action=view&current=devries-joran.flv)


 :shock: Wow...that was the first I saw of the photo-shopped picture of him wearing a white T-shirt pretending to be standing with Natalee. :shock:  Have only so far seen the blue shirt fake photo from last night. Thanks for this video...Joran, your game is up....you will forever be haunted & hunted..  (deVries is so adorable.)


Title: Re: Earrings
Post by: Kat_Gram on November 27, 2006, 08:37:36 PM
Quote from: "IBE"
On of the Monkeys mentioned that the earrings on Natalee we missing in Joran's photoshopped picture.

Would this have any psychological implications or wasn't there an earring supposedly shown to the mom?

Memory is vague. Help please?

I seem to remember a discussion of the earrings was important early on.

I just watched the little clip and the earrings are there in the shopped photo. There is another picture with J and Natalee together as if they are like on a date.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #549 11/27 - 11/28/2006
Post by: klaasend on November 27, 2006, 08:38:02 PM
Quote from: "Buckeye"
The earring is gone.......... :shock:

I think it's still there - hold on, doing a new screen shot that I'll enhance.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #549 11/27 - 11/28/2006
Post by: San on November 27, 2006, 08:39:12 PM
Quote from: "robots"
he would tell his NON INFORMED friends he knew natalee from years ago

they were old pals

he would never hurt her


"see, i even have pictures when i visited her house a couple years ago"


stupid friends would believe the DELICIOUS JORAN  8)

You know this could very well be what he was doing.  They didn't know much about the case in the Netherlands.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #549 11/27 - 11/28/2006
Post by: Kat_Gram on November 27, 2006, 08:40:27 PM
Quote from: "Buckeye"
The earring is gone.......... :shock:

In the video which is a better quality, they are there.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #549 11/27 - 11/28/2006
Post by: Carnut on November 27, 2006, 08:40:43 PM
Quote from: "klaasend"
A repost by NYCHIC of an old SM front page post:
here is another one of those cryptic posts:

—————
Uhm up until now there hasn’t been any more person detained.Maybe that was a news mixup.Today Mr Lejuez (not sure who he is representing)adressed a local radio with some other facts.Or potential facts may I say.
Supposedly Joran van der Sloot was crying in his cell where he is held. And he started talking to Jones(one of the security Guards who is also still held).He said that he thinks that the Kalpoe bro’s might be up to something.HE added that it seemed as if they are trying to make it seem like he killed Ms Holloway.So he decided to “confess”.He said that the Kalpoe brothers dropped him off FIRST.At the goobyes he exchanged email information with Ms Holloway and then he got out of the car.Came monday , they decided to tell the police that all 3 of them dropped Ms NAtalee , and invented the entire 2 security guard story.
My question: WHAT THE HELL IS THIS ? Now you want to “confess” again? And without telling a reason WHY the 3 of you had decided to come up with a story?
You’re all guilty..this is guilty behavior.
But the biggest rumor is this; Joran did get out of the car with Ms Natalee(at the lighthouse/arashi beach)… Accidentaly she stumbled at the beach..She fell on rocks where she hit her head pretty hard.And since then passed out.THey dropped her off a far distance from the Holiday Inn.BUt as guilty as they felt came back a few minutes later to check on her.She was still in the same position as when she was dropped off.Then they discovered she still had no pulse and supposed she turned ice cold and purple.SO they all panicked , took her back in the car , and started to plan what to do. That is how much i know of this ‘rumor’. This is sooo sickening.These guys SHOULD be pressured MUCH harder ..Make them soob so hard they can’t even think straight ,so they confess to this. I believe the rumor.This is a shame , as for I am born and raised on this lovely island. And it makes me sick ! This is unfair , no matter how drunk this girl was.It’s utter and completely wrong. May god rest Natalee’s soul..

Posted by: AuA82 at June 13, 2005 04:44 PM


Heh, heh, believe the 'Biggest Rumor' part, all except the fell and hit head
and the trip to the lighthouse.


Title: Oh my gosh it's gone
Post by: IBE on November 27, 2006, 08:41:43 PM
Oh my gosh, it is gone!

Wow..

Thanks Klaas. One more favor please? My HD crashed and I had thought I had back up most of the stuff... can't find my monkey avatar? Any other way of recoving it... aka you with the giant database? Did you have to add an addition to the house for the databases???

We appreciate your effort though.

Thanks,

IBE

OK Monkeys, what does the photoshopped picture mean with the missing earring???

Hammer, can you contact Dutchlady???

TIA


Title: Lively Case Discussion #549 11/27 - 11/28/2006
Post by: Buckeye on November 27, 2006, 08:42:46 PM
Quote from: "Kat_Gram"
Quote from: "Buckeye"
The earring is gone.......... :shock:

In the video which is a better quality, they are there.


Thanks..I was scared...does that sound like robots.. :lol:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #549 11/27 - 11/28/2006
Post by: BTgirl on November 27, 2006, 08:43:11 PM
Quote from: "klaasend"
A repost by NYCHIC of an old SM front page post:
here is another one of those cryptic posts:

—————
Uhm up until now there hasn’t been any more person detained.Maybe that was a news mixup.Today Mr Lejuez (not sure who he is representing)adressed a local radio with some other facts.Or potential facts may I say.
Supposedly Joran van der Sloot was crying in his cell where he is held. And he started talking to Jones(one of the security Guards who is also still held).He said that he thinks that the Kalpoe bro’s might be up to something.HE added that it seemed as if they are trying to make it seem like he killed Ms Holloway.So he decided to “confess”.He said that the Kalpoe brothers dropped him off FIRST.At the goobyes he exchanged email information with Ms Holloway and then he got out of the car.Came monday , they decided to tell the police that all 3 of them dropped Ms NAtalee , and invented the entire 2 security guard story.
My question: WHAT THE HELL IS THIS ? Now you want to “confess” again? And without telling a reason WHY the 3 of you had decided to come up with a story?
You’re all guilty..this is guilty behavior.
But the biggest rumor is this; Joran did get out of the car with Ms Natalee(at the lighthouse/arashi beach)… Accidentaly she stumbled at the beach..She fell on rocks where she hit her head pretty hard.And since then passed out.THey dropped her off a far distance from the Holiday Inn.BUt as guilty as they felt came back a few minutes later to check on her.She was still in the same position as when she was dropped off.Then they discovered she still had no pulse and supposed she turned ice cold and purple.SO they all panicked , took her back in the car , and started to plan what to do. That is how much i know of this ‘rumor’. This is sooo sickening.These guys SHOULD be pressured MUCH harder ..Make them soob so hard they can’t even think straight ,so they confess to this. I believe the rumor.This is a shame , as for I am born and raised on this lovely island. And it makes me sick ! This is unfair , no matter how drunk this girl was.It’s utter and completely wrong. May god rest Natalee’s soul..

Posted by: AuA82 at June 13, 2005 04:44 PM


You know, I can believe there is some truth to this rumor. I had not previously read this post, but the rumor goes along to some extent with what I had speculated might have happened. Of course, it wouldn't be the entire truth of what happened (not buying the accidental injury), but there are some aspects of the story that I can buy.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #549 11/27 - 11/28/2006
Post by: Ono on November 27, 2006, 08:45:09 PM
Quote from: "San"
Quote from: "LilPuma"
Quote from: "Sue"
Quote from: "dkpen"
You know with this picture of Joran and Natalee is disturbing to me. I can't get it out of my head. ugh!

Taking or making of souviners from or of the victim(s) is evidence of fantasy at work.  Joran has major issues.

GET THE BOY HELP NOW ANITA! Please, before another girl falls victim to your ill-begotten son.



she cant help her boy... she cant help herself


I've often wondered about Anita:  
A.  Is she covering for Joran and Paulus, knowing full well what they do, what kind of men they really are?  

B.  Does she "know" but not really know, and is in denial?  

C.  Is she truly clueless, believing her men are innocent of all charges?

Anita knows exactly what they are and knows the whole story.  Those tears we saw are only because they got caught.


Yes....her pseudo-perfect life is over. Those tears are for herself. The entire world now knows what a terror her delicious Joran really is. Bad seed.


Title: Opps
Post by: IBE on November 27, 2006, 08:45:12 PM
Thanks Kat_Gram,

I was writing the post as you were posting.

So the earring is there in the video but not the still picture? Am confused.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #549 11/27 - 11/28/2006
Post by: klaasend on November 27, 2006, 08:48:43 PM
Red just got off the phone with Beth - Beth and Peter de Vries will be on Greta tonight!!  10pm Eastern


Title: Lively Case Discussion #549 11/27 - 11/28/2006
Post by: Carnut on November 27, 2006, 08:50:03 PM
Quote from: "klaasend"
Red just got off the phone with Beth - Beth and Peter de Vries will be on Greta tonight!!  10pm Eastern


Think any of the crow feathers will be showing around the edges of Greta's mouth?


Title: Lively Case Discussion #549 11/27 - 11/28/2006
Post by: robots on November 27, 2006, 08:50:58 PM
Quote from: "Buckeye"
Quote from: "Kat_Gram"
Quote from: "Buckeye"
The earring is gone.......... :shock:

In the video which is a better quality, they are there.


Thanks..I was scared...does that sound like robots.. :lol:


thats was good ...hehehehehehehehe

but you need to go like this

skeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeered  :twisted:


Title: More Van der Sloot Lies
Post by: carpe noctem on November 27, 2006, 08:51:11 PM
I was going back reading the case documents over the past few days...

I dug up the following Deepak ALE Statement of 6/29/2005

I would like to hear other people's opinions on it.

------------------


Deepak interview with police
6/29/2005

On your question what Joran's mom meant by telling us that we should stay away from the "Marriot Hotel", I can say the following. With this she meant that the police was monitoring that area and that we were already in trouble. So avoid the area and that it was best to head home.

---------------

I find it very strange that Anita singled out the Marriott as a  'HOT ZONE'
and for the boys to stay away due of cop presence. Had Joran already come up with LIE CHANGE #2 by this time?

Something about it doesn't sound riight to me.

Anita is already saying the boys are in trouble.  TROUBLE FOR
WHAT? Leaving Natalee at the beach. That is certainly no crime
if it hapened just the way DILBERT said it did.

How can she reconcile that? The Sporter is innocent
and his poop smells like friggin rose petals... but stay away
from the Marriott because you're in trouble?

SHE'S ALREADY SAYING they are in trouble.

Had the DROP AT MARRIOTT  been introduced at this time?

I don't think it was... I'll have to dig around in the file
archives to go over it again. I'd love to hear anbody's
thoughts on this. -J4N-


Title: Re: Opps
Post by: Kat_Gram on November 27, 2006, 08:51:12 PM
Quote from: "IBE"
Thanks Kat_Gram,

I was writing the post as you were posting.

So the earring is there in the video but not the still picture? Am confused.

It is there, watch the video. There are two shopped pic in the video right at the beginning. The stills just aren't clear, that's all.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #549 11/27 - 11/28/2006
Post by: robots on November 27, 2006, 08:52:00 PM
Quote from: "Carnut"
Quote from: "klaasend"
Red just got off the phone with Beth - Beth and Peter de Vries will be on Greta tonight!!  10pm Eastern


Think any of the crow feathers will be showing around the edges of Greta's mouth?



i hate the killers


greta just makes me want to puke with the

"im inclined to beleive him BULL CRAP"
 8)


Title: Re: More Van der Sloot Lies
Post by: Carnut on November 27, 2006, 08:52:53 PM
Quote from: "carpe noctem"
I was going back reading the case documents over the past few days...

I dug up the following Deepak ALE Statement of 6/29/2005

I would like to hear other people's opinions on it.

------------------


Deepak interview with police
6/29/2005

On your question what Joran's mom meant by telling us that we should stay away from the "Marriot Hotel", I can say the following. With this she meant that the police was monitoring that area and that we were already in trouble. So avoid the area and that it was best to head home.

---------------

I find it very strange that Anita singled out the Marriott as a  'HOT ZONE'
and for the boys to stay away due of cop presence. Had Joran already come up with LIE CHANGE #2 by this time?

Something about it doesn't sound riight to me.

Anita is already saying the boys are in trouble.  TROUBLE FOR
WHAT? Leaving Natalee at the beach. That is certainly no crime
if it hapened just the way DILBERT said it did.

How can she reconcile that? The Sporter is innocent
and his poop smells like friggin rose petals... but stay away
from the Marriott because you're in trouble?

SHE'S ALREADY SAYING they are in trouble.

Had the DROP AT MARRIOTT  been introduced at this time?

I don't think it was... I'll have to dig around in the file
archives to go over it again. I'd love to hear anbody's
thoughts on this. -J4N-


Yeah, the drop of the body in the Marriott's freezer.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #549 11/27 - 11/28/2006
Post by: San on November 27, 2006, 08:52:54 PM
Quote from: "klaasend"
Red just got off the phone with Beth - Beth and Peter de Vries will be on Greta tonight!!  10pm Eastern

Thanks klaas.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #549 11/27 - 11/28/2006
Post by: Kat_Gram on November 27, 2006, 08:54:07 PM
Quote from: "Carnut"
Quote from: "klaasend"
Red just got off the phone with Beth - Beth and Peter de Vries will be on Greta tonight!!  10pm Eastern


Think any of the crow feathers will be showing around the edges of Greta's mouth?

I will break my rule. Although I don't get FOX, so let me know, please. Pretty please guys..

The things that were taken from Joran's place.. they could be " valuable "
in a sense. Wonder if anyone is trying to sell them back to Joran ?


Title: Lively Case Discussion #549 11/27 - 11/28/2006
Post by: Ono on November 27, 2006, 08:54:38 PM
Quote from: "klaasend"
Red just got off the phone with Beth - Beth and Peter de Vries will be on Greta tonight!!  10pm Eastern


 :D  Hot damn !  Thanks for the heads up!


Title: Lively Case Discussion #549 11/27 - 11/28/2006
Post by: memphis on November 27, 2006, 08:57:30 PM
Quote from: "klaasend"
Red just got off the phone with Beth - Beth and Peter de Vries will be on Greta tonight!!  10pm Eastern


This is really wonderful news.
Can ya'll feel the momentum building?  :D  I think things are gonna happen.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #549 11/27 - 11/28/2006
Post by: Buckeye on November 27, 2006, 08:58:01 PM
Quote from: "klaasend"
Red just got off the phone with Beth - Beth and Peter de Vries will be on Greta tonight!!  10pm Eastern


 :D  :D  :D


Title: Lively Case Discussion #549 11/27 - 11/28/2006
Post by: IndyDan on November 27, 2006, 08:59:00 PM
I hope they address the cocaine part.
The cocaine reference in the evidence file is DumPigs last desparate attempt to bring closer to the case. He got dumped on after the Dutch destroyed and covered-up all the obvious evidence, then Dumpig was the stooge put in charge to 'make the case'.  I'm sure the Jacobs, VanDerSludges (both) got a giggle watching poor DumPig trying to bring closer to the case.  His last desparate stab was to bring closure in what is so common in Aruba -- the drug connection.
The coke reference is nothing more than more planted evidence by the ALE.
Natalee was an honor roll student with a full ride scholarship to a major University majoring in Medicine. Active in church, school and community projects.
No history of drugs, yet they'd have us believe that on the few short days the perfect child was on Aruba, she was openly snorting coke lines and offering her friends drugs.
Please, this is right out of the DumPig file trying to blame the victim knowing he can't over trump the Dutch that hold sway on the island.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #549 11/27 - 11/28/2006
Post by: robots on November 27, 2006, 08:59:16 PM
thanks RED

thanks Klass  :lol:  :lol:  :lol:  8)  8)  8)


Title: Lively Case Discussion #549 11/27 - 11/28/2006
Post by: memphis on November 27, 2006, 08:59:35 PM
Quote from: "San"
Quote from: "robots"
he would tell his NON INFORMED friends he knew natalee from years ago

they were old pals

he would never hurt her


"see, i even have pictures when i visited her house a couple years ago"


stupid friends would believe the DELICIOUS JORAN  8)

You know this could very well be what he was doing.  They didn't know much about the case in the Netherlands.


I wonder why he was in such a hurry.

The first picture has to be used. And the guy in the second, third, fourth, or fifth has to be placed in the first picture ( You can choose which one is the easiest to use) The best would be if this one would be pasted onto that girl ( so that that girl who`s standing on the left in the first pic is not seen anymore, if that isn`t really possible, than you have to put this guy just over her)
If that looks believable, and they buy it,than i will make sure you`ll get €200,-- from Kees.
If it isn`t possible, than we can let this guy make a picture that he fits in excactly,
but we don`t have a lot of time.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #549 11/27 - 11/28/2006
Post by: robots on November 27, 2006, 09:00:49 PM
i dont care if natalee was doing drugs or not doing drugs

it doesnt change a thing to me


not a SINGLE THING changes


just another LOAD from the people from EVIL ISLAND  8)


Title: Lively Case Discussion #549 11/27 - 11/28/2006
Post by: Kat_Gram on November 27, 2006, 09:01:59 PM
Interesting that Anita would know of the monitoring isn't it.
.
The little brother was having a play date at the Marriott with the Zeola kid. Paulus had said that he left the casino at the Holiday Inn becasue the youngest kid was being dropped off in Montanja. So, he makes the Zeola's drive all the way to Montanja when he could have gone to the Marriott himself and picked the kid up on the way home ?
.
Joran was home because there was some porn playing. Some alibi.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #549 11/27 - 11/28/2006
Post by: robots on November 27, 2006, 09:02:26 PM
I wonder why he was in such a hurry.

The first picture has to be used. And the guy in the second, third, fourth, or fifth has to be placed in the first picture ( You can choose which one is the easiest to use) The best would be if this one would be pasted onto that girl ( so that that girl who`s standing on the left in the first pic is not seen anymore, if that isn`t really possible, than you have to put this guy just over her)
If that looks believable, and they buy it,than i will make sure you`ll get €200,-- from Kees.
If it isn`t possible, than we can let this guy make a picture that he fits in excactly,
but we don`t have a lot of time.



hmmmmmmmmmmmmmm


Title: Lively Case Discussion #549 11/27 - 11/28/2006
Post by: klaasend on November 27, 2006, 09:03:06 PM
Posted by Crioyo on the front page of SM:

Saw the whole show sunday…Pretty good..even if it was just a summary of what we already knew. It’s the first decent attempt to put it all on mainstream tv. The last time opsporing verzocht did it, they made it look as if joran & co were just witnesses rather than suspects. This time around it was good.

I didn’t know though that Joran had paid someone 200euro’s to photoshop pics of him and natalee to pretend as if they already knew eachother. They showed the email and the account hakers_rule@

and when peter asked paulus on the phone, paulus also said the ‘’we have more information but will bring it out when the time is right, that is when she is found or in such a case'’ speech. same thing joran said on 60 minutes was it?

etc etc…pretty good show and there seems to be a part 2 this week according to me…

will keep an eye out.


Title: Re: More Van der Sloot Lies
Post by: Ono on November 27, 2006, 09:03:30 PM
Quote from: "carpe noctem"
I was going back reading the case documents over the past few days...

I dug up the following Deepak ALE Statement of 6/29/2005

I would like to hear other people's opinions on it.

------------------


Deepak interview with police
6/29/2005

On your question what Joran's mom meant by telling us that we should stay away from the "Marriot Hotel", I can say the following. With this she meant that the police was monitoring that area and that we were already in trouble. So avoid the area and that it was best to head home.

---------------

I find it very strange that Anita singled out the Marriott as a  'HOT ZONE'
and for the boys to stay away due of cop presence. Had Joran already come up with LIE CHANGE #2 by this time?

Something about it doesn't sound riight to me.

Anita is already saying the boys are in trouble.  TROUBLE FOR
WHAT? Leaving Natalee at the beach. That is certainly no crime
if it hapened just the way DILBERT said it did.

How can she reconcile that? The Sporter is innocent
and his poop smells like friggin rose petals... but stay away
from the Marriott because you're in trouble?

SHE'S ALREADY SAYING they are in trouble.

Had the DROP AT MARRIOTT  been introduced at this time?

I don't think it was... I'll have to dig around in the file
archives to go over it again. I'd love to hear anbody's
thoughts on this. -J4N-


Carpe: My honest take when I first read that awhile back, was that hadn't Joran already gotten in trouble with (at that time) the Gen. Mgr's. daughter? Most likely, his reputation was big time trouble by then and he had been warned to stay off property and I bet his parents had been warned also to keep Joran off property. That girl had been a fellow student at the International School.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #549 11/27 - 11/28/2006
Post by: robots on November 27, 2006, 09:03:51 PM
Quote from: "Kat_Gram"
Interesting that Anita would know of the monitoring isn't it.
.
The little brother was having a play date at the Marriott with the Zeola kid. Paulus had said that he left the casino at the Holiday Inn becasue the youngest kid was being dropped off in Montanja. So, he makes the Zeola's drive all the way to Montanja when he could have gone to the Marriott himself and picked the kid up on the way home ?
.
Joran was home because there was some porn playing. Some alibi.


YES, the porn playing is a GREAT ALIBI


NOT
NOT
NOT
NOT
NOT

see, i think EVIL ISLAND also known as TOILET  thinks people are STUPID


Title: Lively Case Discussion #549 11/27 - 11/28/2006
Post by: memphis on November 27, 2006, 09:04:46 PM
Does anyone else feel disgusted with Fox and Greta? They want the story once De vries is successful; however, when we were begging and pleading for some newsperson to investigate (Greta,Geraldo), there was silence.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #549 11/27 - 11/28/2006
Post by: memphis on November 27, 2006, 09:06:34 PM
Quote from: "IndyDan"
I hope they address the cocaine part.
The cocaine reference in the evidence file is DumPigs last desparate attempt to bring closer to the case. He got dumped on after the Dutch destroyed and covered-up all the obvious evidence, then Dumpig was the stooge put in charge to 'make the case'.  I'm sure the Jacobs, VanDerSludges (both) got a giggle watching poor DumPig trying to bring closer to the case.  His last desparate stab was to bring closure in what is so common in Aruba -- the drug connection.
The coke reference is nothing more than more planted evidence by the ALE.
Natalee was an honor roll student with a full ride scholarship to a major University majoring in Medicine. Active in church, school and community projects.
No history of drugs, yet they'd have us believe that on the few short days the perfect child was on Aruba, she was openly snorting coke lines and offering her friends drugs.
Please, this is right out of the DumPig file trying to blame the victim knowing he can't over trump the Dutch that hold sway on the island.


I think you pretty much nailed it.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #549 11/27 - 11/28/2006
Post by: robots on November 27, 2006, 09:07:04 PM
"we have more information but will bring it out when the time is right"

per DOCTOR EVIL



thats wwhat we call the OLD SWITCHAROO


stalling for time

LOADSVILLE

dont know what to say



 :twisted:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #549 11/27 - 11/28/2006
Post by: IBE on November 27, 2006, 09:11:50 PM
Kat_Gram

Sorry to be so far behind.

What is the full name of the "Zeola kid"? Thanks.

IBE


Title: Lively Case Discussion #549 11/27 - 11/28/2006
Post by: IBE on November 27, 2006, 09:12:07 PM
Kat_Gram

Sorry to be so far behind.

What is the full name of the "Zeola kid"? Thanks.

IBE


Title: Lively Case Discussion #549 11/27 - 11/28/2006
Post by: nonesuche on November 27, 2006, 09:13:25 PM
For those asking about the date of the photo appearing on RU, it appeared at the latest, the first week of January of this year. It was taken from a private photo album of one of the MB girls on the trip from Facebook, NOT MySpace. I have sent all of the info to Klaas along with screenshots of the properties for the actual folder and files as well. So please know I am not attempting to advance any measure of false information. At that time Facebook was NOT international and also only allowed US university students to register.

I am still searching out more supportive evidence but the FIRST place that photo emerged was on RU, during the period StinkyPete and WangChung were heralding how "the answers lie in MB". There are a series of photos in that album from that party, Klaas has them all now as well.

I'll be back later, must run it's been just a very busy day......but wanted to respond as quickly as I could to tyler's questions.

As for Greta, here's what I hope she looks like tonight (http://i86.photobucket.com/albums/k101/daisysistah/GIFS/smilies/word/eggedsmiley.gif)


Title: Lively Case Discussion #549 11/27 - 11/28/2006
Post by: Ono on November 27, 2006, 09:13:37 PM
Quote from: "memphis"
Does anyone else feel disgusted with Fox and Greta? They want the story once De vries is successful; however, when we were begging and pleading for some newsperson to investigate (Greta,Geraldo), there was silence.


Well, I love FOX, as that is all we watch here, and I can forgive Greta as long as she keeps Natalee's story out there. Sooner or later, Greta will have to realize that she was snookered. Timing is everything and if it takes Greta's participation, so be it. One thing is certain: There is no such thing as a perfect crime and the sooner Greta realizes that, the wiser she will be.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #549 11/27 - 11/28/2006
Post by: Kat_Gram on November 27, 2006, 09:14:58 PM
I do think that we are overreating on the cocaine part of the program.
Pretty sure it came from Dompid via Boeti Naar. Or GVC.
There were several blonde girls in Aruba at the time. One was spotted in the gas station Not Natalee. One was in the jewelry store, Not Natalee.  
There was also one at the front desk at the HI, again, Not Natalee.
Julia though she had seen her, turned out, another Not Natalee.
So, Devries used what he had from the police files, but who is to say that the girl was Natalee.
I did go to some Dutch comment sites that were from the FP and I could not measure the reaction, but the word cocaine did not come up on the translation.  
The big issue to me is Ben King being in the apartment when the seacrh was conducted.
Janssin asking for a search of the whole property, DeWitt limiting it to only Joran's residence. Did KJ even have a come back ? Like, possessions that were in Joran's apartment could be anywhere on the property ? Or did it not enter her mind that bedding, mattress tops, etc could be moved from one room to another ? Then, when the Sloots went to stay at the King's, stuff went there. Most likely, it did not come back.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #549 11/27 - 11/28/2006
Post by: IndyDan on November 27, 2006, 09:16:13 PM
My opinion and mine only. There was no lighthouse visit , no beach walk. Joran VanderSloot and the Kalpoes, rolled into CnCs 30 minutes before closing time to target a tourist girl for their date-rape scheme.
Like animals in the wild, they picked out their victim, they snapped the trap and Natalee never knew what hit her.
No lighthouse, no beach, straight to VanDerSloot household to video tape the rape of an innocent American tourist girl.  
Their previous victims probably woke up on the beach, wondering what happened and scrambling to make their flight home.
What's sad and sick about this little scam is that everyone on Aruba knew it went on and turned a blind eye.  
Innocent fun for the sporting PIMPS, no one ever figured one of their victims would die. They didn't know how to deal with a death.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #549 11/27 - 11/28/2006
Post by: memphis on November 27, 2006, 09:19:31 PM
Quote from: "nonesuche"
For those asking about the date of the photo appearing on RU, it appeared at the latest, the first week of January of this year. It was taken from a private photo album of one of the MB girls on the trip from Facebook, NOT MySpace. I have sent all of the info to Klaas along with screenshots of the properties for the actual folder and files as well. So please know I am not attempting to advance any measure of false information. At that time Facebook was NOT international and also only allowed US university students to register.

I am still searching out more supportive evidence but the FIRST place that photo emerged was on RU, during the period StinkyPete and WangChung were heralding how "the answers lie in MB". There are a series of photos in that album from that party, Klaas has them all now as well.

I'll be back later, must run it's been just a very busy day......but wanted to respond as quickly as I could to tyler's questions.

As for Greta, here's what I hope she looks like tonight (http://i86.photobucket.com/albums/k101/daisysistah/GIFS/smilies/word/eggedsmiley.gif)


Thank you Nonesuche!
I was asking many of the questions. I think this is significant.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #549 11/27 - 11/28/2006
Post by: memphis on November 27, 2006, 09:21:11 PM
Quote from: "Kat_Gram"
I do think that we are overreating on the cocaine part of the program.
Pretty sure it came from Dompid via Boeti Naar. Or GVC.
There were several blonde girls in Aruba at the time. One was spotted in the gas station Not Natalee. One was in the jewelry store, Not Natalee.  
There was also one at the front desk at the HI, again, Not Natalee.
Julia though she had seen her, turned out, another Not Natalee.
So, Devries used what he had from the police files, but who is to say that the girl was Natalee.
I did go to some Dutch comment sites that were from the FP and I could not measure the reaction, but the word cocaine did not come up on the translation.  
The big issue to me is Ben King being in the apartment when the seacrh was conducted.
Janssin asking for a search of the whole property, DeWitt limiting it to only Joran's residence. Did KJ even have a come back ? Like, possessions that were in Joran's apartment could be anywhere on the property ? Or did it not enter her mind that bedding, mattress tops, etc could be moved from one room to another ? Then, when the Sloots went to stay at the King's, stuff went there. Most likely, it did not come back.


good points


Title: Lively Case Discussion #549 11/27 - 11/28/2006
Post by: tcumom on November 27, 2006, 09:22:08 PM
Quote from: "Buckeye"
Quote from: "klaasend"
Red just got off the phone with Beth - Beth and Peter de Vries will be on Greta tonight!!  10pm Eastern


 :D  :D  :D

We need an all-call monkey alert system!  8)  

I'll be tuned in and ready to go~haven't listened to Greta in ages.....just hope she'll keep quiet and let them speak .... wishful thinking. :?


Title: Lively Case Discussion #549 11/27 - 11/28/2006
Post by: Kat_Gram on November 27, 2006, 09:22:12 PM
Quote from: "IBE"
Kat_Gram

Sorry to be so far behind.

What is the full name of the "Zeola kid"? Thanks.

IBE

I do not know if it was ever mentioned. There is/was  a Zeola who is the manager of the Mariott.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #549 11/27 - 11/28/2006
Post by: klaasend on November 27, 2006, 09:23:14 PM
NEW FRONT PAGE POST:

So Why Does an Innocent Man Pay for a Fauxtograph of Joran Van der Sloot with Natalee Holloway?


http://www.scaredmonkeys.com/2006/11/27/so-why-does-an-innocent-man-pay-for-a-fauxtograph-of-joran-van-der-sloot-with-natalee-holloway/


Title: Lively Case Discussion #549 11/27 - 11/28/2006
Post by: Kat_Gram on November 27, 2006, 09:24:55 PM
Do you think Greta will be happy that Peter thinks her boyfriend is guilty ?


Title: Lively Case Discussion #549 11/27 - 11/28/2006
Post by: Red on November 27, 2006, 09:26:01 PM
Quote from: "Carnut"
Quote from: "klaasend"
Red just got off the phone with Beth - Beth and Peter de Vries will be on Greta tonight!!  10pm Eastern


Think any of the crow feathers will be showing around the edges of Greta's mouth?


SM asks Greta ... On the Record Greta ... Are you still inclined to believe him?

What you say now Greta?


Title: Lively Case Discussion #549 11/27 - 11/28/2006
Post by: robots on November 27, 2006, 09:27:09 PM
Quote from: "Red"
Quote from: "Carnut"
Quote from: "klaasend"
Red just got off the phone with Beth - Beth and Peter de Vries will be on Greta tonight!!  10pm Eastern


Think any of the crow feathers will be showing around the edges of Greta's mouth?


SM asks Greta ... On the Record Greta ... Are you still inclined to believe him?

What you say now Greta?


ROBOTS says

GRETA tries spinning the COMMENT


 :evil:  :evil:  :evil:  :evil:


Title: Re: More Van der Sloot Lies
Post by: carpe noctem on November 27, 2006, 09:27:52 PM
Quote from: "Carnut"
Quote from: "carpe noctem"
I was going back reading the case documents over the past few days...

I dug up the following Deepak ALE Statement of 6/29/2005

I would like to hear other people's opinions on it.

------------------


Deepak interview with police
6/29/2005

On your question what Joran's mom meant by telling us that we should stay away from the "Marriot Hotel", I can say the following. With this she meant that the police was monitoring that area and that we were already in trouble. So avoid the area and that it was best to head home.

---------------

I find it very strange that Anita singled out the Marriott as a  'HOT ZONE'
and for the boys to stay away due of cop presence. Had Joran already come up with LIE CHANGE #2 by this time?

Something about it doesn't sound riight to me.

Anita is already saying the boys are in trouble.  TROUBLE FOR
WHAT? Leaving Natalee at the beach. That is certainly no crime
if it hapened just the way DILBERT said it did.

How can she reconcile that? The Sporter is innocent
and his poop smells like friggin rose petals... but stay away
from the Marriott because you're in trouble?

SHE'S ALREADY SAYING they are in trouble.

Had the DROP AT MARRIOTT  been introduced at this time?

I don't think it was... I'll have to dig around in the file
archives to go over it again. I'd love to hear anbody's
thoughts on this. -J4N-


Yeah, the drop of the body in the Marriott's freezer.



hi there, carnut...

I didn't see a smiley face or an eye roll...

are you serious?

.... that could explain a lot.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #549 11/27 - 11/28/2006
Post by: robots on November 27, 2006, 09:27:56 PM
<--------------not impressed with GRETA at all


Title: Lively Case Discussion #549 11/27 - 11/28/2006
Post by: klaasend on November 27, 2006, 09:28:16 PM
Greta will say "I never said he was innocent, just said I was inclined to believe him after interviewing him"


Title: Lively Case Discussion #549 11/27 - 11/28/2006
Post by: IndyDan on November 27, 2006, 09:28:33 PM
Does anyone else feel disgusted with Fox and Greta? They want the story once De vries is successful; however, when we were begging and pleading for some newsperson to investigate (Greta,Geraldo), there was silence.
_________________
Memphis - I hate FOX and Greta is media slut. Once she said "I'm inclined to believe him"  I turned her off.  Not to mention how she all but gave Taco Joe the blowjarb in every interview. Even Jossy complained that he never got the last word, she always let Taco get last say.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #549 11/27 - 11/28/2006
Post by: memphis on November 27, 2006, 09:28:59 PM
Quote from: "Red"
Quote from: "Carnut"
Quote from: "klaasend"
Red just got off the phone with Beth - Beth and Peter de Vries will be on Greta tonight!!  10pm Eastern


Think any of the crow feathers will be showing around the edges of Greta's mouth?


SM asks Greta ... On the Record Greta ... Are you still inclined to believe him?

What you say now Greta?


Yeah, and where have you been Greta?   :evil:

Great front page Red!


Title: Lively Case Discussion #549 11/27 - 11/28/2006
Post by: robots on November 27, 2006, 09:29:22 PM
Quote from: "klaasend"
Greta will say "I never said he was innocent, just said I was inclined to believe him after interviewing him"


yep !!!!!!!!!

in robotic world we call it spinning
 8)


Title: Lively Case Discussion #549 11/27 - 11/28/2006
Post by: robots on November 27, 2006, 09:30:14 PM
Quote from: "IndyDan"
Does anyone else feel disgusted with Fox and Greta? They want the story once De vries is successful; however, when we were begging and pleading for some newsperson to investigate (Greta,Geraldo), there was silence.
_________________
Memphis - I hate FOX and Greta is media slut. Once she said "I'm inclined to believe him"  I turned her off.  Not to mention how she all but gave Taco Joe the blowjarb in every interview. Even Jossy complained that he never got the last word, she always let Taco get last say.



she makes me puke

 :P


Title: Lively Case Discussion #549 11/27 - 11/28/2006
Post by: carpe noctem on November 27, 2006, 09:31:01 PM
(http://i76.photobucket.com/albums/j32/carpehumor/dealtACECALLINGcard-1.png)

JUSTICE FOR  NATALEE


Title: Lively Case Discussion #549 11/27 - 11/28/2006
Post by: Lala'sMom on November 27, 2006, 09:31:55 PM
Evening monkeys...I see Greta has recovered from her "i tend to believe him" induced coma to once again go for the ratings... :roll:


Title: Re: More Van der Sloot Lies
Post by: Carnut on November 27, 2006, 09:34:30 PM
Quote from: "carpe noctem"
Quote from: "Carnut"

Yeah, the drop of the body in the Marriott's freezer.



hi there, carnut...

I didn't see a smiley face or an eye roll...

are you serious?

.... that could explain a lot.


Well, yes I am semi serious. Seems reasonable if one has a dead body on their hands, one might be looking for someplace to store it temporarily until one can dispose of it.

If for some reason Anita is cautioning against going near there, that might be to keep the cops from having any reason to go near there.

Seems if PVDS was QA/QC guy for a hospital he might have had access to food facilities of most all the hotels in the area for inspections or investigations.

Dunno, just musings on my part.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #549 11/27 - 11/28/2006
Post by: carpe noctem on November 27, 2006, 09:35:24 PM
10-4

Dan,

She lost me after that last Joran interview. A few weeks later...
she could have been following up on the Natalee tragedy...

instead she used some of her airtime to focus on REAL IMPORTANT
MATTERS.

It was af fluff piece on LEWIS THE CRIMINAL CAT. (pun intended)


Title: Lively Case Discussion #549 11/27 - 11/28/2006
Post by: memphis on November 27, 2006, 09:36:14 PM
Quote from: "IndyDan"
Does anyone else feel disgusted with Fox and Greta? They want the story once De vries is successful; however, when we were begging and pleading for some newsperson to investigate (Greta,Geraldo), there was silence.
_________________
Memphis - I hate FOX and Greta is media slut. Once she said "I'm inclined to believe him"  I turned her off.  Not to mention how she all but gave Taco Joe the blowjarb in every interview. Even Jossy complained that he never got the last word, she always let Taco get last say.


Yeah, I've thought about her and Taco. She has to kiss up because she needs him for other stuff. I suspect that's partly the reason for "I tend to believe him".  

Thanks for "seeing" me. I've been feeling a bit invisible the last couple of days.  :wink:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #549 11/27 - 11/28/2006
Post by: klaasend on November 27, 2006, 09:36:57 PM
SLOOT HIDING  :wink:

(http://i37.photobucket.com/albums/e82/klaasend2/SlootHiding.jpg)


Title: Re: More Van der Sloot Lies
Post by: carpe noctem on November 27, 2006, 09:37:26 PM
Quote from: "Carnut"
Quote from: "carpe noctem"
Quote from: "Carnut"

Yeah, the drop of the body in the Marriott's freezer.



hi there, carnut...

I didn't see a smiley face or an eye roll...

are you serious?

.... that could explain a lot.


Well, yes I am semi serious. Seems reasonable if one has a dead body on their hands, one might be looking for someplace to store it temporarily until one can dispose of it.

If for some reason Anita is cautioning against going near there, that might be to keep the cops from having any reason to go near there.

Seems if PVDS was QA/QC guy for a hospital he might have had access to food facilities of most all the hotels in the area for inspections or investigations.

Dunno, just musings on my part.


Wow, I find those musings very interesting.

The MARRIOTT, is that owned by Posner or related in any way
to Posner?


Title: Lively Case Discussion #549 11/27 - 11/28/2006
Post by: memphis on November 27, 2006, 09:37:37 PM
Hi Lalas!


Title: Lively Case Discussion #549 11/27 - 11/28/2006
Post by: Atlmetroguy on November 27, 2006, 09:37:49 PM
Good Evening Monkeys....looks like a ducked in on a banner night...should be interesting!!!

I've been distracted by the UA coaching drama all day...lol.....


Title: Lively Case Discussion #549 11/27 - 11/28/2006
Post by: Ono on November 27, 2006, 09:38:18 PM
Quote from: "klaasend"
Greta will say "I never said he was innocent, just said I was inclined to believe him after interviewing him"


Absolutely....that will be what she says at some point in time. All very matter of factly and in a sterile manner.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #549 11/27 - 11/28/2006
Post by: memphis on November 27, 2006, 09:39:24 PM
Quote from: "klaasend"
SLOOT HIDING  :wink:

(http://i37.photobucket.com/albums/e82/klaasend2/SlootHiding.jpg)



 :D That is some video, isn't it?


Title: Lively Case Discussion #549 11/27 - 11/28/2006
Post by: Kat_Gram on November 27, 2006, 09:40:18 PM
I've been inclined to not watch Greta. She makes me gag.  I do not get Fox and all it would take is a phone call to get it, no $$, but  don't even go to her stinkng Greta wire thing. or Fox web site.

Why would Anita think they were looking at the Mariott that early on ?
The SG were the ones they were looking at. Why the Mariott that early ?
And who told Anita that ? Jan Van Der's wife ?


Title: Lively Case Discussion #549 11/27 - 11/28/2006
Post by: Lala'sMom on November 27, 2006, 09:40:42 PM
Quote from: "memphis"
Hi Lalas!


Memphis!! How are you?


Title: Lively Case Discussion #549 11/27 - 11/28/2006
Post by: Ono on November 27, 2006, 09:41:33 PM
Quote from: "Atlmetroguy"
Good Evening Monkeys....looks like a ducked in on a banner night...should be interesting!!!

I've been distracted by the UA coaching drama all day...lol.....


Say it won't be that old maid in britches, Spurrier.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #549 11/27 - 11/28/2006
Post by: BTgirl on November 27, 2006, 09:41:44 PM
Quote from: "Atlmetroguy"
Good Evening Monkeys....looks like a ducked in on a banner night...should be interesting!!!

I've been distracted by the UA coaching drama all day...lol.....


Waving to Metro. (http://the-jurybox.com/TJB/Smileys/default/wavey.gif)


Title: Lively Case Discussion #549 11/27 - 11/28/2006
Post by: Atlmetroguy on November 27, 2006, 09:43:03 PM
Quote from: "Ono"
Quote from: "Atlmetroguy"
Good Evening Monkeys....looks like a ducked in on a banner night...should be interesting!!!

I've been distracted by the UA coaching drama all day...lol.....


Say it won't be that old maid in britches, Spurrier.

****************************
No doubt...lol...after all the rumours I read today I'll volunteer for the job!!! Should be interesting....


Title: Lively Case Discussion #549 11/27 - 11/28/2006
Post by: Lala'sMom on November 27, 2006, 09:43:17 PM
BT
Hi there, missed you.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #549 11/27 - 11/28/2006
Post by: justinsmama on November 27, 2006, 09:43:41 PM
Quote from: "Ono"
Quote from: "klaasend"
Red just got off the phone with Beth - Beth and Peter de Vries will be on Greta tonight!!  10pm Eastern


 :D  Hot damn !  Thanks for the heads up!


Whoohoo! What Ono said!


Title: Lively Case Discussion #549 11/27 - 11/28/2006
Post by: Atlmetroguy on November 27, 2006, 09:43:44 PM
Quote from: "BTgirl"
Quote from: "Atlmetroguy"
Good Evening Monkeys....looks like a ducked in on a banner night...should be interesting!!!

I've been distracted by the UA coaching drama all day...lol.....


Waving to Metro. (http://the-jurybox.com/TJB/Smileys/default/wavey.gif)

*****************************
Heya BT...how'sthe Choo Choo?


Title: Lively Case Discussion #549 11/27 - 11/28/2006
Post by: Ono on November 27, 2006, 09:44:19 PM
Quote from: "memphis"
Quote from: "IndyDan"
Does anyone else feel disgusted with Fox and Greta? They want the story once De vries is successful; however, when we were begging and pleading for some newsperson to investigate (Greta,Geraldo), there was silence.
_________________
Memphis - I hate FOX and Greta is media slut. Once she said "I'm inclined to believe him"  I turned her off.  Not to mention how she all but gave Taco Joe the blowjarb in every interview. Even Jossy complained that he never got the last word, she always let Taco get last say.


Yeah, I've thought about her and Taco. She has to kiss up because she needs him for other stuff. I suspect that's partly the reason for "I tend to believe him".  

Thanks for "seeing" me. I've been feeling a bit invisible the last couple of days.  :wink:


Greta kissed up to Geragos all during the Scott Peterson trial, to the point where it was downright embarrassing.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #549 11/27 - 11/28/2006
Post by: Ono on November 27, 2006, 09:45:03 PM
Quote from: "justinsmama"
Quote from: "Ono"
Quote from: "klaasend"
Red just got off the phone with Beth - Beth and Peter de Vries will be on Greta tonight!!  10pm Eastern


 :D  Hot damn !  Thanks for the heads up!


Whoohoo! What Ono said!


Six more minutes! :D


Title: Lively Case Discussion #549 11/27 - 11/28/2006
Post by: Atlmetroguy on November 27, 2006, 09:46:03 PM
Quote from: "Ono"
Quote from: "justinsmama"
Quote from: "Ono"
Quote from: "klaasend"
Red just got off the phone with Beth - Beth and Peter de Vries will be on Greta tonight!!  10pm Eastern


 :D  Hot damn !  Thanks for the heads up!


Whoohoo! What Ono said!


Six more minutes! :D

*********************************
heh...heh...good thing I installed a new wireless router and charged the laptop battery!!!


Title: Re: More Van der Sloot Lies
Post by: justinsmama on November 27, 2006, 09:46:24 PM
Quote from: "Carnut"
Quote from: "carpe noctem"
Quote from: "Carnut"

Yeah, the drop of the body in the Marriott's freezer.



hi there, carnut...

I didn't see a smiley face or an eye roll...

are you serious?

.... that could explain a lot.


Well, yes I am semi serious. Seems reasonable if one has a dead body on their hands, one might be looking for someplace to store it temporarily until one can dispose of it.

If for some reason Anita is cautioning against going near there, that might be to keep the cops from having any reason to go near there.

Seems if PVDS was QA/QC guy for a hospital he might have had access to food facilities of most all the hotels in the area for inspections or investigations.

Dunno, just musings on my part.


She may also have been referring to staying away from the Marriott in their story about that night/morning.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #549 11/27 - 11/28/2006
Post by: Elaine on November 27, 2006, 09:46:30 PM
Quote from: "memphis"
Quote from: "klaasend"
SLOOT HIDING  :wink:

(http://i37.photobucket.com/albums/e82/klaasend2/SlootHiding.jpg)



 :D That is some video, isn't it?
Yes it sure is! I loved it! :D Hello Monkeys!


Title: Lively Case Discussion #549 11/27 - 11/28/2006
Post by: carpe noctem on November 27, 2006, 09:46:34 PM
In another ALE Statement from Deecrack

He says "Joran was making an excuse that he and Natalee went outside
and he left the girl on the beach."

When D said OUTSIDE, it really jumped off the page for me. In order
to go OUTSIDE, you must be FIRST, ON THE INSIDE.

From what Deepak said, it sounds like they were definitely IN THE MARRIOTT first. HMMMMM???????

-J4N


Title: Lively Case Discussion #549 11/27 - 11/28/2006
Post by: bleachedblack on November 27, 2006, 09:46:35 PM
Evening Monks, seems like you all have had a busy day in the cage. I'm reading to catch up. So deVries on Greta tonight, that sounds interesting. I get the feeling that in an interview situation he is going to be even more candid. Going to watch.......


Title: Lively Case Discussion #549 11/27 - 11/28/2006
Post by: memphis on November 27, 2006, 09:46:38 PM
Quote from: "Lala'sMom"
Quote from: "memphis"
Hi Lalas!


Memphis!! How are you?


I'm doing well!  :D

There is lots of excitement in the air! Do ya feel it?

I do want to discuss something with you later - been looking for you.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #549 11/27 - 11/28/2006
Post by: Carnut on November 27, 2006, 09:46:40 PM
Quote from: "Ono"
Quote from: "justinsmama"
Quote from: "Ono"
Quote from: "klaasend"
Red just got off the phone with Beth - Beth and Peter de Vries will be on Greta tonight!!  10pm Eastern


 :D  Hot damn !  Thanks for the heads up!


Whoohoo! What Ono said!


Six more minutes! :D


Heh, heh, better hope it's not the last six minutes of her show.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #549 11/27 - 11/28/2006
Post by: BTgirl on November 27, 2006, 09:47:03 PM
Quote from: "Lala'sMom"
BT
Hi there, missed you.


Howdy, Lalas.

I'm taking a little break from the sock monkeys.  :lol:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #549 11/27 - 11/28/2006
Post by: Ono on November 27, 2006, 09:47:13 PM
Quote from: "Atlmetroguy"
Quote from: "Ono"
Quote from: "Atlmetroguy"
Good Evening Monkeys....looks like a ducked in on a banner night...should be interesting!!!

I've been distracted by the UA coaching drama all day...lol.....


Say it won't be that old maid in britches, Spurrier.

****************************
No doubt...lol...after all the rumours I read today I'll volunteer for the job!!! Should be interesting....


You'll get my vote!  I honestly don't think it will be Spurrier, do you?


Title: Lively Case Discussion #549 11/27 - 11/28/2006
Post by: justinsmama on November 27, 2006, 09:47:35 PM
Yup, metro, good thing ya did!


Title: Lively Case Discussion #549 11/27 - 11/28/2006
Post by: carpe noctem on November 27, 2006, 09:48:12 PM
PEEK-A-BOO

STREET


SPORTER!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

 :lol:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #549 11/27 - 11/28/2006
Post by: Angiex911dsptchr on November 27, 2006, 09:48:48 PM
Evening monkey folks..
Question real quick.. Im behind.. who is this KEES person??
TY!!


Title: Lively Case Discussion #549 11/27 - 11/28/2006
Post by: Ono on November 27, 2006, 09:48:52 PM
Quote from: "bleachedblack"
Evening Monks, seems like you all have had a busy day in the cage. I'm reading to catch up. So deVries on Greta tonight, that sounds interesting. I get the feeling that in an interview situation he is going to be even more candid. Going to watch.......


I hope we get to SEE him...he is a hottie. 8)


Title: Lively Case Discussion #549 11/27 - 11/28/2006
Post by: klaasend on November 27, 2006, 09:49:23 PM
Going to the other room to watch Greta, brb.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #549 11/27 - 11/28/2006
Post by: Atlmetroguy on November 27, 2006, 09:49:40 PM
Quote from: "Ono"
Quote from: "Atlmetroguy"
Quote from: "Ono"
Quote from: "Atlmetroguy"
Good Evening Monkeys....looks like a ducked in on a banner night...should be interesting!!!

I've been distracted by the UA coaching drama all day...lol.....


Say it won't be that old maid in britches, Spurrier.

****************************
No doubt...lol...after all the rumours I read today I'll volunteer for the job!!! Should be interesting....


You'll get my vote!  I honestly don't think it will be Spurrier, do you?

*********************************
Not a chance IMO but then again look how Fran bolted in the face of the sanctions...at the end of the day it's all about the $$$$$$


Title: Lively Case Discussion #549 11/27 - 11/28/2006
Post by: Ono on November 27, 2006, 09:50:34 PM
Quote from: "carpe noctem"
PEEK-A-BOO

STREET


SPORTER!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

 :lol:


 :lol: Carpe...you have such great wit. I always enjoy every one of your front page posts. You are a sharp cookie.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #549 11/27 - 11/28/2006
Post by: memphis on November 27, 2006, 09:50:36 PM
Quote from: "Ono"
Greta kissed up to Geragos all during the Scott Peterson trial, to the point where it was downright embarrassing.


I think it's her MO.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #549 11/27 - 11/28/2006
Post by: Lala'sMom on November 27, 2006, 09:50:51 PM
Sure Memphis...I am going to watch Greta and then I will be right back to dance. :wink:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #549 11/27 - 11/28/2006
Post by: Ono on November 27, 2006, 09:52:08 PM
Quote from: "memphis"
Quote from: "Ono"
Greta kissed up to Geragos all during the Scott Peterson trial, to the point where it was downright embarrassing.


I think it's her MO.


I agree..Gotta go watch now..


Title: Lively Case Discussion #549 11/27 - 11/28/2006
Post by: memphis on November 27, 2006, 09:52:24 PM
Quote from: "bleachedblack"
Evening Monks, seems like you all have had a busy day in the cage. I'm reading to catch up. So deVries on Greta tonight, that sounds interesting. I get the feeling that in an interview situation he is going to be even more candid. Going to watch.......


Hi bleachedblack, you beautiful Gilda monkey you.  :D

Hi Elaine!  :D


Title: Lively Case Discussion #549 11/27 - 11/28/2006
Post by: Atlmetroguy on November 27, 2006, 09:52:36 PM
Watching Greta....just freaking amazing how she/they act like this is new information.....


Title: Lively Case Discussion #549 11/27 - 11/28/2006
Post by: Angiex911dsptchr on November 27, 2006, 09:52:36 PM
Evening monkey folks..
Question real quick.. Im behind.. who is this KEES person??
TY!!


Title: Lively Case Discussion #549 11/27 - 11/28/2006
Post by: crazybabyborg on November 27, 2006, 09:52:56 PM
Anyone notice that Joran's shirt when he is handcuffed going in the car is the same as in the fake photo?


Title: Lively Case Discussion #549 11/27 - 11/28/2006
Post by: carpe noctem on November 27, 2006, 09:53:18 PM
Quote from: "Kat_Gram"
I've been inclined to not watch Greta. She makes me gag.  I do not get Fox and all it would take is a phone call to get it, no $$, but  don't even go to her stinkng Greta wire thing. or Fox web site.

Why would Anita think they were looking at the Mariott that early on ?
The SG were the ones they were looking at. Why the Mariott that early ?
And who told Anita that ? Jan Van Der's wife ?



Hiya Kat,

Do we have any idea what color uniforms the Marriott SG Staff wears?

More specifically, do they wear all black & carry walkie-talkies.

 :?:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #549 11/27 - 11/28/2006
Post by: San on November 27, 2006, 09:53:23 PM
Apparently De Vries said Carlo was in a panic when De Vries told him what he knew.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #549 11/27 - 11/28/2006
Post by: Angiex911dsptchr on November 27, 2006, 09:53:39 PM
Quote from: "Atlmetroguy"
Watching Greta....just freaking amazing how she/they act like this is new information.....


 Hi Metro.. nice to see you.
KJ sure sounds liek shes involved bigtime huh?
I have it on on the other room.
Unreal.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #549 11/27 - 11/28/2006
Post by: Ono on November 27, 2006, 09:54:22 PM
Quote from: "Atlmetroguy"
Quote from: "Ono"
Quote from: "Atlmetroguy"
Quote from: "Ono"
Quote from: "Atlmetroguy"
Good Evening Monkeys....looks like a ducked in on a banner night...should be interesting!!!

I've been distracted by the UA coaching drama all day...lol.....


Say it won't be that old maid in britches, Spurrier.

****************************
No doubt...lol...after all the rumours I read today I'll volunteer for the job!!! Should be interesting....


You'll get my vote!  I honestly don't think it will be Spurrier, do you?

*********************************
Not a chance IMO but then again look how Fran bolted in the face of the sanctions...at the end of the day it's all about the $$$$$$


Finebaum said it was supposedly because he didn't get things that were promised to him, but that was no excuse for the way Fran betrayed the trust of the players.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #549 11/27 - 11/28/2006
Post by: Atlmetroguy on November 27, 2006, 09:54:45 PM
Quote from: "Angiex911dsptchr"
Quote from: "Atlmetroguy"
Watching Greta....just freaking amazing how she/they act like this is new information.....


 Hi Metro.. nice to see you.
KJ sure sounds liek shes involved bigtime huh?
I have it on on the other room.
Unreal.

**************
Hey Ange...good to see you too!! I have always thought KJ was neck (among other body parts) deep in this whole deal.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #549 11/27 - 11/28/2006
Post by: BTgirl on November 27, 2006, 09:55:09 PM
Quote from: "Angiex911dsptchr"
Evening monkey folks..
Question real quick.. Im behind.. who is this KEES person??
TY!!



Hi Angie. Hope you get an answer cause I was wondering about KEES myself.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #549 11/27 - 11/28/2006
Post by: carpe noctem on November 27, 2006, 09:55:46 PM
Quote from: "Ono"
Quote from: "carpe noctem"
PEEK-A-BOO

STREET


SPORTER!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

 :lol:


 :lol: Carpe...you have such great wit. I always enjoy every one of your front page posts. You are a sharp cookie.



 :wink:

Hi Ono,

Thank you very much for the nice compliment!


Title: Lively Case Discussion #549 11/27 - 11/28/2006
Post by: memphis on November 27, 2006, 09:56:07 PM
Quote from: "Angiex911dsptchr"
Evening monkey folks..
Question real quick.. Im behind.. who is this KEES person??
TY!!


Hi Angie. Check page one of this thread, or Red's latest front page post.
His name comes from an email coorespondence of Joran's.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #549 11/27 - 11/28/2006
Post by: Atlmetroguy on November 27, 2006, 09:56:14 PM
Quote from: "Ono"
Quote from: "Atlmetroguy"
Quote from: "Ono"
Quote from: "Atlmetroguy"
Quote from: "Ono"
Quote from: "Atlmetroguy"
Good Evening Monkeys....looks like a ducked in on a banner night...should be interesting!!!

I've been distracted by the UA coaching drama all day...lol.....


Say it won't be that old maid in britches, Spurrier.

****************************
No doubt...lol...after all the rumours I read today I'll volunteer for the job!!! Should be interesting....


You'll get my vote!  I honestly don't think it will be Spurrier, do you?

*********************************
Not a chance IMO but then again look how Fran bolted in the face of the sanctions...at the end of the day it's all about the $$$$$$


Finebaum said it was supposedly because he didn't get things that were promised to him, but that was no excuse for the way Fran betrayed the trust of the players.

******************
eh...Finebaum is an idiot...not saying there's not some truth to that but I have to take everything out of Finebaum's mouth with a grain of salt.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #549 11/27 - 11/28/2006
Post by: Angiex911dsptchr on November 27, 2006, 09:56:23 PM
Quote from: "Atlmetroguy"
Quote from: "Angiex911dsptchr"
Quote from: "Atlmetroguy"
Watching Greta....just freaking amazing how she/they act like this is new information.....


 Hi Metro.. nice to see you.
KJ sure sounds liek shes involved bigtime huh?
I have it on on the other room.
Unreal.

**************
Hey Ange...good to see you too!! I have always thought KJ was neck (among other body parts) deep in this whole deal.


  :) Metro..!!


Title: Lively Case Discussion #549 11/27 - 11/28/2006
Post by: Angiex911dsptchr on November 27, 2006, 09:57:02 PM
Quote from: "BTgirl"
Quote from: "Angiex911dsptchr"
Evening monkey folks..
Question real quick.. Im behind.. who is this KEES person??
TY!!



Hi Angie. Hope you get an answer cause I was wondering about KEES myself.


  Howdy BT.. I know iys here somewhere. LOL


Title: Lively Case Discussion #549 11/27 - 11/28/2006
Post by: Angiex911dsptchr on November 27, 2006, 09:57:35 PM
Quote from: "memphis"
Quote from: "Angiex911dsptchr"
Evening monkey folks..
Question real quick.. Im behind.. who is this KEES person??
TY!!


Hi Angie. Check page one of this thread, or Red's latest front page post.
His name comes from an email coorespondence of Joran's.


  Thanks Sweety!!!!  :)


Title: Lively Case Discussion #549 11/27 - 11/28/2006
Post by: Carnut on November 27, 2006, 09:59:50 PM
WAY TO GO BETH!!!!


Title: Lively Case Discussion #549 11/27 - 11/28/2006
Post by: Elaine on November 27, 2006, 10:01:38 PM
Quote from: "Carnut"
WAY TO GO BETH!!!!
:D  :D  :D


Title: Lively Case Discussion #549 11/27 - 11/28/2006
Post by: nonesuche on November 27, 2006, 10:01:40 PM
woohoo  obstruction of justice, go Beth is right !!!!!!!

she certainly gave Red/Tom/Klaas their props too !


Title: Lively Case Discussion #549 11/27 - 11/28/2006
Post by: igsigs on November 27, 2006, 10:02:02 PM
Greta should be embarrassed.

De Vries accomplished more in a few weeks than she did in 18 months.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #549 11/27 - 11/28/2006
Post by: memphis on November 27, 2006, 10:02:12 PM
Quote from: "Angiex911dsptchr"
Quote from: "memphis"
Quote from: "Angiex911dsptchr"
Evening monkey folks..
Question real quick.. Im behind.. who is this KEES person??
TY!!


Hi Angie. Check page one of this thread, or Red's latest front page post.
His name comes from an email coorespondence of Joran's.


  Thanks Sweety!!!!  :)


More specifically, Klaas posted a screen shoot of the emails posted at JoranBlogSpot.

You are very welcome!


Title: Lively Case Discussion #549 11/27 - 11/28/2006
Post by: Carnut on November 27, 2006, 10:02:25 PM
If nothing else DeVries is at least gonna make JVDS the Dutch OJ.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #549 11/27 - 11/28/2006
Post by: Atlmetroguy on November 27, 2006, 10:02:51 PM
Quote from: "nonesuche"
woohoo  obstruction of justice, go Beth is right !!!!!!!

she certainly gave Red/Tom/Klaas their props too !

************************
Heya....yeah she did!!!


RTR!!


Title: Lively Case Discussion #549 11/27 - 11/28/2006
Post by: nonesuche on November 27, 2006, 10:03:21 PM
Quote from: "igsigs"
Greta should be embarrassed.

De Vries accomplished more in a few weeks than she did in 18 months.


to coin her own phrase, Greta has been immensely cruel  :roll:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #549 11/27 - 11/28/2006
Post by: Jacqueline on November 27, 2006, 10:03:44 PM
The search was strange, the search warrant was made by jansen to search the whole address...but the police were on the spot, another high ranking official reduced the search warrant just to jorans space. This was very strange....They had a belief that something happened to natalle that something may have happened to natalee in the garden...

Corruption??

well, corruption is, what I think is, its' a small island and everyone knows eachother..when the police arrived at the vds home, a close friend is somebody who works for the justice dept.   that was strange....a good friend of the family....police gets the impressiotn, that everyone knows each other and is helping each other. that is not good for an investigation.

greta:  do you , are you satisfied that kJ has doen everything?

No, i'm not, the justice dpt. could have done a lot more, and I still think it is not too late.  They did not do things they should have done, and it's a pity.

What I figured out is natalle never made it to the beach. they don't believe the story anymore....

No no , they are all focused on the three, there is no doubt about that...

Joran's lawyer spoke to the prosecutor....

Beth:  Well the report clearly shows alll of our frustrations, and carlo had a meeting with KJ, it's just, we have known this all along...

I think there are people who are protecting and deraling this investigation. they are the ones who have info as to what happened...

Have you heard from KJ?

No, zero, greta, nothing from her.

No, we hear nothing from anyone from aruba...

For peter to pick this up, otherwise we would not even now find the persons involved in derailing the investigation.

Police never think she made it to the beach.

beth:  Ya know, there were 4 diff versions of how joran told how he got home from the beach..devries picked up on this...

G: where do you go from here beth?  

B:  I think the first person to start with is the personnel who work in the justice dept. who are responsible for deraling the investigation. to talk to them would be a great start.

G; how are you all getting thru this?

b:  still no answers, but we have been able to pull alot of pstive things out of this. trying to turn our tragedy into good so it does not happen to other people. We are readily able to accept any help from the Netherlands.

I don't know but it does give us vindication, this show that we have been fighting this undercurrent.  Jvds is still the primary suspect....It feels good to know that the people who were fighting us all along the way..

Ya know, greta it is very cruel to, to not be forthright with the family and to share with us the news...they were hampering our efforts every step of the way.  I wish they would have the decency to just tell us...

G: beth thank you...


Title: Lively Case Discussion #549 11/27 - 11/28/2006
Post by: Elaine on November 27, 2006, 10:03:59 PM
Can you say COVERUP


Title: Lively Case Discussion #549 11/27 - 11/28/2006
Post by: Carnut on November 27, 2006, 10:04:10 PM
Heh, heh, Greta's summation actually made me change the channel.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #549 11/27 - 11/28/2006
Post by: memphis on November 27, 2006, 10:04:25 PM
Quote from: "igsigs"
Greta should be embarrassed.

De Vries accomplished more in a few weeks than she did in 18 months.


Thank you!!   :roll:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #549 11/27 - 11/28/2006
Post by: robots on November 27, 2006, 10:05:25 PM
BETH ROCKS

Monkeys ROCK


Greta is a BAG OF ROCKS  8)


Title: Lively Case Discussion #549 11/27 - 11/28/2006
Post by: nonesuche on November 27, 2006, 10:05:31 PM
Did you notice how Greta used her dismissive tone to say "I hope someone helps you" at the end? Not perhaps we can help you more now, or perhaps we weren't as effective as we might have been.......nada from the ice queen Greta.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #549 11/27 - 11/28/2006
Post by: Carnut on November 27, 2006, 10:06:08 PM
Does appear that Greta was just shown what 'real' investigative reporting is all about.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #549 11/27 - 11/28/2006
Post by: klaasend on November 27, 2006, 10:06:25 PM
Jacqueline - THANKS!

I'm glad the drug issue wasn't even brought up because it's a NON ISSUE.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #549 11/27 - 11/28/2006
Post by: robots on November 27, 2006, 10:06:48 PM
Quote from: "Carnut"
Does appear that Greta was just shown what 'real' investigative reporting is all about.


yep


GRETA THE RATINGS HOG


Title: Lively Case Discussion #549 11/27 - 11/28/2006
Post by: Lala'sMom on November 27, 2006, 10:06:55 PM
Wow!  I am impressed once again at Beth's graciousness.  I can't say I would be as nice.  So is KJ a Dirty Hand?


Title: Lively Case Discussion #549 11/27 - 11/28/2006
Post by: BTgirl on November 27, 2006, 10:07:09 PM
Quote from: "memphis"
Quote from: "igsigs"
Greta should be embarrassed.

De Vries accomplished more in a few weeks than she did in 18 months.


Thank you!!   :roll:


I thought Greta's face and hair looked kind of plain and bland tonight. Wait - maybe it was just indigestion from eating that tough old crow.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #549 11/27 - 11/28/2006
Post by: Atlmetroguy on November 27, 2006, 10:07:41 PM
Quote from: "Carnut"
Does appear that Greta was just shown what 'real' investigative reporting is all about.

*******************
However...Greta is not an investigative reporter...just another media talking head who probably should stayed with the practice of law.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #549 11/27 - 11/28/2006
Post by: Jacqueline on November 27, 2006, 10:08:10 PM
Quote from: klaasend
Jacqueline - THANKS!  :wink:

]


Title: Lively Case Discussion #549 11/27 - 11/28/2006
Post by: Carnut on November 27, 2006, 10:09:09 PM
Quote from: "Atlmetroguy"
Quote from: "Carnut"
Does appear that Greta was just shown what 'real' investigative reporting is all about.

*******************
However...Greta is not an investigative reporter...just another media talking head who probably should stayed with the practice of law.


One might hope this would galvanize someone like Geraldo to get involved and try to really get it solved.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #549 11/27 - 11/28/2006
Post by: carpe noctem on November 27, 2006, 10:09:20 PM
BRAND NEW FROM "WIZCO"

The ANITA VAN DER SLOOT Designer Bra!

(http://i76.photobucket.com/albums/j32/carpehumor/anitasBRAhasitsownPOWERGRID.jpg)


Here another happy customer:

"I bought one last month, and it really lights up my life!" -- Debby Boone


Order now, operators are not standing by.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #549 11/27 - 11/28/2006
Post by: robots on November 27, 2006, 10:09:32 PM
to understand why joran thinks they way he does and does the things he does.

once must try to think like a wack job

its skerrrrrrrrrrrrrryy

but i will try it


give me a few minutes  8)


Title: Lively Case Discussion #549 11/27 - 11/28/2006
Post by: Jacqueline on November 27, 2006, 10:10:25 PM
Quote from: "Carnut"
Quote from: "Atlmetroguy"
Quote from: "Carnut"
Does appear that Greta was just shown what 'real' investigative reporting is all about.

*******************
However...Greta is not an investigative reporter...just another media talking head who probably should stayed with the practice of law.


One might hope this would galvanize someone like Geraldo to get involved and try to really get it solved.


I'm hoping that Aruba will feel more pressure from Devries and the netherland investigative reporters.

We've already seen how they treat Americans.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #549 11/27 - 11/28/2006
Post by: robots on November 27, 2006, 10:10:29 PM
Quote from: "carpe noctem"
BRAND NEW FROM "WIZCO"

The ANITA VAN DER SLOOT Designer Bra!

(http://i76.photobucket.com/albums/j32/carpehumor/anitasBRAhasitsownPOWERGRID.jpg)


Here another happy customer:

"I bought one last month, and it really lights up my life!" -- Debby Boone


Order now, operators are not standing by.



OH MY !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! :shock:  :shock:  :shock:  :shock:

fallen down and cant get up

 8)  :lol:  :lol:  :lol:  :lol:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #549 11/27 - 11/28/2006
Post by: Atlmetroguy on November 27, 2006, 10:11:06 PM
Quote from: "Carnut"
Quote from: "Atlmetroguy"
Quote from: "Carnut"
Does appear that Greta was just shown what 'real' investigative reporting is all about.

*******************
However...Greta is not an investigative reporter...just another media talking head who probably should stayed with the practice of law.


One might hope this would galvanize someone like Geraldo to get involved and try to really get it solved.

************************
I would agree but it would have to be somebody with much more credibility. Now having said that it's hard to imagine anybody in the media having credibility.....maybe Sean Hannity but that's all that comes to mind.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #549 11/27 - 11/28/2006
Post by: Elaine on November 27, 2006, 10:11:11 PM
Quote from: "carpe noctem"
BRAND NEW FROM "WIZCO"

The ANITA VAN DER SLOOT Designer Bra!

(http://i76.photobucket.com/albums/j32/carpehumor/anitasBRAhasitsownPOWERGRID.jpg)


Here another happy customer:

"I bought one last month, and it really lights up my life!" -- Debby Boone


Order now, operators are not standing by.
ROFL !!!!! :lol:  :lol:  :lol:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #549 11/27 - 11/28/2006
Post by: Red on November 27, 2006, 10:11:28 PM
I would just like to say thank you to Klaas for all the hard work she put forth on the statements.

Way to go ... Time well spent.

Klaas rocks  :wink:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #549 11/27 - 11/28/2006
Post by: robots on November 27, 2006, 10:11:50 PM
Quote from: "Red"
I would just like to say thank you to Klaas for all the hard work she put forth on the statements.

Way to go ... Time well spent.

Klaas rocks  :wink:


yes he does





 8)


Title: Lively Case Discussion #549 11/27 - 11/28/2006
Post by: Atlmetroguy on November 27, 2006, 10:13:12 PM
Quote from: "Red"
I would just like to say thank you to Klaas for all the hard work she put forth on the statements.

Way to go ... Time well spent.

Klaas rocks  :wink:

************************************
Absolutely!!! And thanks the the whole SM crew and all the Monkey's tireless efforts day after day night after night!!!!!!!!!!!!!


Title: Lively Case Discussion #549 11/27 - 11/28/2006
Post by: WidgetTheMidget on November 27, 2006, 10:13:12 PM
Quote from: Jacqueline
Quote from: "klaasend"
Jacqueline - THANKS!  :wink:

]


Thanks Jacquie .............

 8)


Title: Lively Case Discussion #549 11/27 - 11/28/2006
Post by: Angiex911dsptchr on November 27, 2006, 10:13:33 PM
Quote from: "nonesuche"
Did you notice how Greta used her dismissive tone to say "I hope someone helps you" at the end? Not perhaps we can help you more now, or perhaps we weren't as effective as we might have been.......nada from the ice queen Greta.


 I agree sistah.. cold hearted she seemed . pfffffffffffft


Title: Lively Case Discussion #549 11/27 - 11/28/2006
Post by: BTgirl on November 27, 2006, 10:13:36 PM
Quote from: "robots"
Quote from: "Red"
I would just like to say thank you to Klaas for all the hard work she put forth on the statements.

Way to go ... Time well spent.

Klaas rocks  :wink:


yes he does

 8)


And his yellow bow just adds that finishing touch!  :wink:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #549 11/27 - 11/28/2006
Post by: klaasend on November 27, 2006, 10:13:53 PM
Thanks Red!  My pleasure, anything to help get resolution in this case.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #549 11/27 - 11/28/2006
Post by: robots on November 27, 2006, 10:14:16 PM
Quote from: "BTgirl"
Quote from: "robots"
Quote from: "Red"
I would just like to say thank you to Klaas for all the hard work she put forth on the statements.

Way to go ... Time well spent.

Klaas rocks  :wink:


yes he does

 8)


And his yellow bow just adds that finishing touch!  :wink:



ROFL


Title: Lively Case Discussion #549 11/27 - 11/28/2006
Post by: klaasend on November 27, 2006, 10:14:29 PM
BT :lol:  :lol:  :lol:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #549 11/27 - 11/28/2006
Post by: nonesuche on November 27, 2006, 10:14:36 PM
Quote from: "Red"
I would just like to say thank you to Klaas for all the hard work she put forth on the statements.

Way to go ... Time well spent.

Klaas rocks  :wink:


I like to do it in caps  :lol:

KLAAS ROCKS !!!!!!!!!!!!!!


Title: Lively Case Discussion #549 11/27 - 11/28/2006
Post by: Kat_Gram on November 27, 2006, 10:14:43 PM
Quote from: "Red"
I would just like to say thank you to Klaas for all the hard work she put forth on the statements.

Way to go ... Time well spent.

Klaas rocks  :wink:

yep


Title: Lively Case Discussion #549 11/27 - 11/28/2006
Post by: Carnut on November 27, 2006, 10:14:54 PM
Quote from: "Red"
I would just like to say thank you to Klaas for all the hard work she put forth on the statements.

Way to go ... Time well spent.

Klaas rocks  :wink:


You did notice Beth's mention of SM didn't you?


Title: Lively Case Discussion #549 11/27 - 11/28/2006
Post by: memphis on November 27, 2006, 10:14:54 PM
Quote from: "Lala'sMom"
Wow!  I am impressed once again at Beth's graciousness.  I can't say I would be as nice.  So is KJ a Dirty Hand?


I think she is a dirty hand.  :wink:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #549 11/27 - 11/28/2006
Post by: GabbyG on November 27, 2006, 10:15:00 PM
Quote from: "LilPuma"
Quote from: "Sue"
Quote from: "dkpen"
You know with this picture of Joran and Natalee is disturbing to me. I can't get it out of my head. ugh!

Taking or making of souviners from or of the victim(s) is evidence of fantasy at work.  Joran has major issues.

GET THE BOY HELP NOW ANITA! Please, before another girl falls victim to your ill-begotten son.



she cant help her boy... she cant help herself


I've often wondered about Anita:  
A.  Is she covering for Joran and Paulus, knowing full well what they do, what kind of men they really are?  

B.  Does she "know" but not really know, and is in denial?  

C.  Is she truly clueless, believing her men are innocent of all charges?


Evening Monkeys   :D  Hey Lil Puma...I started to go with B, but as I was typing out my response I realized that I actually think she may be aware, I dont see how she couldn't be after all this time. I am sure she has shed many tears while talking to joran and also to paulus, asking questions, watching their faces, listening to the tone of their voices as they answered. Also I dont see how joran or paulus could keep her from hearing things they said to each other now and then, even if they tried to. She would hear some things, thus she would almost have to know the truth even if she wont allow it to settle in her heart. I have to go with A, I think she does know, but perhaps wants to be in denial because she loves them.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #549 11/27 - 11/28/2006
Post by: Angiex911dsptchr on November 27, 2006, 10:15:34 PM
ROFL  Carpe!!!!!!!!!!!!!!


Title: Lively Case Discussion #549 11/27 - 11/28/2006
Post by: robots on November 27, 2006, 10:16:11 PM
anita knows


Title: Lively Case Discussion #549 11/27 - 11/28/2006
Post by: Lala'sMom on November 27, 2006, 10:16:25 PM
Quote from: "memphis"
Quote from: "Lala'sMom"
Wow!  I am impressed once again at Beth's graciousness.  I can't say I would be as nice.  So is KJ a Dirty Hand?


I think she is a dirty hand.  :wink:


Me too.  :wink:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #549 11/27 - 11/28/2006
Post by: carpe noctem on November 27, 2006, 10:16:58 PM
I second, or third, or fourth that!!!

Klass kicks a lot of 'Boeti' ...and keeps
the wheels moving
with good traction.


a big THANK YOU


Title: Lively Case Discussion #549 11/27 - 11/28/2006
Post by: Red on November 27, 2006, 10:17:07 PM
Just to let you all know, in the past month or so there was an specific IP from Holland on SM reading away and printing pages.

Takes a while to read statements, or so I am told. ;)


Title: Lively Case Discussion #549 11/27 - 11/28/2006
Post by: Jacqueline on November 27, 2006, 10:17:35 PM
Quote from: WidgetTheMidget
Quote from: "Jacqueline"
Quote from: "klaasend"
Jacqueline - THANKS!  :wink:

]


Thanks Jacquie .............

 8)

Hey Widge.... :lol:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #549 11/27 - 11/28/2006
Post by: Carnut on November 27, 2006, 10:17:44 PM
Quote from: "robots"
anita knows


Heck, anita is in charge, even if JVDS and KJ have a thing going on.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #549 11/27 - 11/28/2006
Post by: Kat_Gram on November 27, 2006, 10:17:52 PM
Was SM mentioned on Gerta Gag Me Show ?
Did DeVries mention SM ?
At this point, the American MSM is out of it.
The follow up has to be via the Dutch.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #549 11/27 - 11/28/2006
Post by: Carnut on November 27, 2006, 10:18:15 PM
Ooops, that's PVDS and KJ have a thing going on.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #549 11/27 - 11/28/2006
Post by: robots on November 27, 2006, 10:18:17 PM
Quote from: "Carnut"
Quote from: "robots"
anita knows


Heck, anita is in charge, even if JVDS and KJ have a thing going on.


yep


Title: Lively Case Discussion #549 11/27 - 11/28/2006
Post by: Carnut on November 27, 2006, 10:18:50 PM
Quote from: "Kat_Gram"
Was SM mentioned on Gerta Gag Me Show ?
Did DeVries mention SM ?
At this point, the American MSM is out of it.
The follow up has to be via the Dutch.


Beth said it.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #549 11/27 - 11/28/2006
Post by: WidgetTheMidget on November 27, 2006, 10:20:20 PM
Quote from: Jacqueline
Quote from: "WidgetTheMidget"
Quote from: "Jacqueline"
Quote from: "klaasend"
Jacqueline - THANKS!  :wink:

]


Thanks Jacquie .............

 8)

Hey Widge.... :lol:


What Happened To Our New York Football Giants Yesterday ...........

 :cry:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #549 11/27 - 11/28/2006
Post by: Kat_Gram on November 27, 2006, 10:21:32 PM
Hello Widgie ! !  !


Title: Lively Case Discussion #549 11/27 - 11/28/2006
Post by: the big hammer on November 27, 2006, 10:21:53 PM
Obstruction of Justice

Beth is correct -- both "right" and "correct."

j2k and Paulus are vulnerable to mumerous ancillary charges:

Obstruction (All 4 of them)

Perjury (k2 false witness statements)

Conspiracy to Commit Perjury (k2 witness/suspect and jvds suspect statements)

Contempt of Court (k2 false witness statements)

Where is the prosecution for these obvious crimes -- OBVIOUS CRIMES.
What kind of Public Prosecutor lets criminals walk the streets when OBVIOUS CRIMES have been committed?  What kind of Government permits this?

Who interprets and enforces the law on Aruba?

Anyone with a local connection and a few ben franklins in their pocket?  This is a disgrace...and it's all starting to bubble up...

.  
.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #549 11/27 - 11/28/2006
Post by: Jacqueline on November 27, 2006, 10:22:02 PM
Quote from: WidgetTheMidget
Quote from: "Jacqueline"
Quote from: "WidgetTheMidget"
Quote from: "Jacqueline"
Quote from: "klaasend"
Jacqueline - THANKS!  :wink:

]


Thanks Jacquie .............

 8)

Hey Widge.... :lol:


What Happened To Our New York Football Giants Yesterday ...........

 :cry:


We melted.

Closed door team meeting only held today.
We have to beat Dallas Sunday...


Title: Lively Case Discussion #549 11/27 - 11/28/2006
Post by: Atlmetroguy on November 27, 2006, 10:22:17 PM
Quote from: WidgetTheMidget
Quote from: "Jacqueline"
Quote from: "WidgetTheMidget"
Quote from: "Jacqueline"
Quote from: "klaasend"
Jacqueline - THANKS!  :wink:

]


Thanks Jacquie .............

 8)

Hey Widge.... :lol:


What Happened To Our New York Football Giants Yesterday ...........

 :cry:

*************************************
It would appear the Wunderkind Manning fell compltely apart...I did not watch the game just saw some highlights on ESPN.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #549 11/27 - 11/28/2006
Post by: WidgetTheMidget on November 27, 2006, 10:22:33 PM
Quote from: "Kat_Gram"
Hello Widgie ! !  !


Hi Kat ...........

Hope Things Are Well With You .............

 8)


Title: Lively Case Discussion #549 11/27 - 11/28/2006
Post by: bleachedblack on November 27, 2006, 10:23:29 PM
Quote from: "memphis"
Quote from: "bleachedblack"
Evening Monks, seems like you all have had a busy day in the cage. I'm reading to catch up. So deVries on Greta tonight, that sounds interesting. I get the feeling that in an interview situation he is going to be even more candid. Going to watch.......


Hi bleachedblack, you beautiful Gilda monkey you.  :D

Hi Elaine!  :D


Hi Memphis hope everyone is well tonight. I just watched Beth and the Devries interview on Greta, some of the things DV mentioned sent me searching for an old post.........this was posted at SM JUNE 29, 2005. It  gives me chills today to read this posters impressions from that date.

++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++

PostPosted: Wed Jun 29, 2005 5:44 pm    Post subject: mines     Add User to Ignore List Reply with quote
I see something that is sending me some image. I have got today a long channel with a grid over, might be a well, and some sign of a bank like that shown on this image as an overhang, I am as near as can be from that image shown and would say as only seeing one check it out. I see from photo red shape and cannot have seen this before.

I have a view very long distance of a shape like a lighthouse so wonder if this wave like bank overhang is near the ruin or seen as low elevation from the gold mines as I would not know.Please check out if there is a well there, that is important, or cover as grid over some old mine, asp. God loves all his children who are pure in heart.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #549 11/27 - 11/28/2006
Post by: WidgetTheMidget on November 27, 2006, 10:24:32 PM
Quote from: Atlmetroguy
Quote from: "WidgetTheMidget"
Quote from: "Jacqueline"
Quote from: "WidgetTheMidget"
Quote from: "Jacqueline"
Quote from: "klaasend"
Jacqueline - THANKS!  :wink:

]


Thanks Jacquie .............

 8)

Hey Widge.... :lol:


What Happened To Our New York Football Giants Yesterday ...........

 :cry:

*************************************
It would appear the Wunderkind Manning fell compltely apart...I did not watch the game just saw some highlights on ESPN.


Not Mannings Fault .......

Plaxico & The Rookie End Made It Happen .........


Title: Lively Case Discussion #549 11/27 - 11/28/2006
Post by: WidgetTheMidget on November 27, 2006, 10:26:38 PM
Quote from: "memphis"
Quote from: "Lala'sMom"
Wow!  I am impressed once again at Beth's graciousness.  I can't say I would be as nice.  So is KJ a Dirty Hand?


I think she is a dirty hand.  :wink:


HI Memphis ...........

I Said It From Day 1 .................

KJ Is A Grand POS ...........

 8)


Title: Lively Case Discussion #549 11/27 - 11/28/2006
Post by: Atlmetroguy on November 27, 2006, 10:27:07 PM
Quote from: WidgetTheMidget
Quote from: "Atlmetroguy"
Quote from: "WidgetTheMidget"
Quote from: "Jacqueline"
Quote from: "WidgetTheMidget"
Quote from: "Jacqueline"
Quote from: "klaasend"
Jacqueline - THANKS!  :wink:

]


Thanks Jacquie .............

 8)

Hey Widge.... :lol:


What Happened To Our New York Football Giants Yesterday ...........

 :cry:

*************************************
It would appear the Wunderkind Manning fell compltely apart...I did not watch the game just saw some highlights on ESPN.


Not Mannings Fault .......

Plaxico & The Rookie End Made It Happen .........

***********************************
Thanks Widget...I was only seeing brief glimpses between conference calls today and did not get the whole scoop.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #549 11/27 - 11/28/2006
Post by: Kat_Gram on November 27, 2006, 10:27:29 PM
Quote from: "WidgetTheMidget"
Quote from: "Kat_Gram"
Hello Widgie ! !  !


Hi Kat ...........

Hope Things Are Well With You .............

 8)

They are. the past few days have been busy with this. Alot of things have come out and I hope that there is some follow up in the ass kicking that Aruba deserves from Holland. But there has to be some charges laid.
hey, how's the track ?


Title: Lively Case Discussion #549 11/27 - 11/28/2006
Post by: Jacqueline on November 27, 2006, 10:27:39 PM
Quote from: "WidgetTheMidget"
Quote from: "memphis"
Quote from: "Lala'sMom"
Wow!  I am impressed once again at Beth's graciousness.  I can't say I would be as nice.  So is KJ a Dirty Hand?


I think she is a dirty hand.  :wink:


HI Memphis ...........

I Said It From Day 1 .................

KJ Is A Grand POS ...........

 8)


Yes, you sure did.  You pegged it.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #549 11/27 - 11/28/2006
Post by: WidgetTheMidget on November 27, 2006, 10:28:24 PM
Quote from: "Kat_Gram"
Quote from: "WidgetTheMidget"
Quote from: "Kat_Gram"
Hello Widgie ! !  !


Hi Kat ...........

Hope Things Are Well With You .............

 8)

They are. the past few days have been busy with this. Alot of things have come out and I hope that there is some follow up in the ass kicking that Aruba deserves from Holland. But there has to be some charges laid.
hey, how's the track ?


THe Weather Is Clear & The Track Is Fast ...............

 8)


Title: Lively Case Discussion #549 11/27 - 11/28/2006
Post by: klaasend on November 27, 2006, 10:29:15 PM
Just posted on the front page of SM by Windy City: :lol:  :lol:

Nice plug from Beth on Greta!! Maybe next time VDS gives an idiot interview he’ll plug FOB and Refs!


Title: Lively Case Discussion #549 11/27 - 11/28/2006
Post by: bleachedblack on November 27, 2006, 10:29:50 PM
Quote from: "klaasend"
Just posted no the front page of SM by Windy City: :lol:  :lol:

Nice plug from Beth on Greta!! Maybe next time VDS gives an idiot interview he’ll plug FOB and Refs!


Bravo Bravo loud and clear :!:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #549 11/27 - 11/28/2006
Post by: WidgetTheMidget on November 27, 2006, 10:30:39 PM
Quote from: "Jacqueline"
Quote from: "WidgetTheMidget"
Quote from: "memphis"
Quote from: "Lala'sMom"
Wow!  I am impressed once again at Beth's graciousness.  I can't say I would be as nice.  So is KJ a Dirty Hand?


I think she is a dirty hand.  :wink:


HI Memphis ...........

I Said It From Day 1 .................

KJ Is A Grand POS ...........

 8)


Yes, you sure did.  You pegged it.


Now You Have To Wonder What Exactly Did She Present To The Judge

Last Year That Sprung The Sporter ..........

 8)


Title: Lively Case Discussion #549 11/27 - 11/28/2006
Post by: memphis on November 27, 2006, 10:32:31 PM
Quote from: "WidgetTheMidget"
Quote from: "memphis"
Quote from: "Lala'sMom"
Wow!  I am impressed once again at Beth's graciousness.  I can't say I would be as nice.  So is KJ a Dirty Hand?


I think she is a dirty hand.  :wink:


HI Memphis ...........

I Said It From Day 1 .................

KJ Is A Grand POS ...........

 8)


and you bees right, Midget!

Where have you been? Monks have been asking about you. Have your ears been burning?


Title: Lively Case Discussion #549 11/27 - 11/28/2006
Post by: WidgetTheMidget on November 27, 2006, 10:34:47 PM
Quote from: "memphis"
Quote from: "WidgetTheMidget"
Quote from: "memphis"
Quote from: "Lala'sMom"
Wow!  I am impressed once again at Beth's graciousness.  I can't say I would be as nice.  So is KJ a Dirty Hand?


I think she is a dirty hand.  :wink:


HI Memphis ...........

I Said It From Day 1 .................

KJ Is A Grand POS ...........

 8)


and you bees right, Midget!

Where have you been? Monks have been asking about you. Have your ears been burning?


Been Reading Here When I Have Time ...........

Harvesting A Bumper Crop This Year .......

So Thats The Ringing In My Ears I Have Been Having ..........

 8)


Title: Lively Case Discussion #549 11/27 - 11/28/2006
Post by: WidgetTheMidget on November 27, 2006, 10:36:50 PM
Quote from: "Jacqueline"
Quote from: "WidgetTheMidget"
Quote from: "memphis"
Quote from: "Lala'sMom"
Wow!  I am impressed once again at Beth's graciousness.  I can't say I would be as nice.  So is KJ a Dirty Hand?


I think she is a dirty hand.  :wink:


HI Memphis ...........

I Said It From Day 1 .................

KJ Is A Grand POS ...........

 8)


Yes, you sure did.  You pegged it.


Jacquie Thanks For The Cards ...........

I Have To Open Them Tonight .......

Been Tooooo Busy Lately .........

 :lol:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #549 11/27 - 11/28/2006
Post by: klaasend on November 27, 2006, 10:41:06 PM
So let's hope the rumor that De Vries is going to do a follow-up show soon is true!


Title: Lively Case Discussion #549 11/27 - 11/28/2006
Post by: Atlmetroguy on November 27, 2006, 10:41:17 PM
Good Night All...pleasant dreams to you all....

metro....out


Title: Lively Case Discussion #549 11/27 - 11/28/2006
Post by: Lala'sMom on November 27, 2006, 10:41:28 PM
Memphis
What is your question? I am back and ready to dance. :wink:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #549 11/27 - 11/28/2006
Post by: carpe noctem on November 27, 2006, 10:41:34 PM
hi there...

Does Posner own the MARRIOTT at Palm Beach?

Does anyone know?


Title: Lively Case Discussion #549 11/27 - 11/28/2006
Post by: klaasend on November 27, 2006, 10:41:53 PM
Quote from: "Atlmetroguy"
Good Night All...pleasant dreams to you all....

metro....out

Nite Metro!  Good to see you!


Title: Lively Case Discussion #549 11/27 - 11/28/2006
Post by: Jacqueline on November 27, 2006, 10:42:10 PM
Quote from: "WidgetTheMidget"
Quote from: "Jacqueline"
Quote from: "WidgetTheMidget"
Quote from: "memphis"
Quote from: "Lala'sMom"
Wow!  I am impressed once again at Beth's graciousness.  I can't say I would be as nice.  So is KJ a Dirty Hand?


I think she is a dirty hand.  :wink:


HI Memphis ...........

I Said It From Day 1 .................

KJ Is A Grand POS ...........

 8)


Yes, you sure did.  You pegged it.


Jacquie Thanks For The Cards ...........

I Have To Open Them Tonight .......

Been Tooooo Busy Lately .........

 :lol:


Oh WIdge you are welcome man.
Open them whenever you get some free moments... :lol:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #549 11/27 - 11/28/2006
Post by: klaasend on November 27, 2006, 10:42:44 PM
Quote from: "carpe noctem"
hi there...

Does Posner own the MARRIOTT at Palm Beach?

Does anyone know?

No, Posner does not own the Marriott or any hotel.  He owns the Excelsior Casino in the Holiday Inn.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #549 11/27 - 11/28/2006
Post by: Angiex911dsptchr on November 27, 2006, 10:43:00 PM
Hi Widget!!  Nice to see you!!
Hope you are all doing well!! How are the girls  :)


Title: Lively Case Discussion #549 11/27 - 11/28/2006
Post by: klaasend on November 27, 2006, 10:46:36 PM
Note to Medleyrelay!  

You have got to be kidding..you really think we believe the JoranBlog was created by Joran???   :lol:  :lol:  :lol:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #549 11/27 - 11/28/2006
Post by: Angiex911dsptchr on November 27, 2006, 10:48:19 PM
Quote from: "klaasend"
Note to Medleyrelay!  

You have got to be kidding..you really think we believe the JoranBlog was created by Joran???   :lol:  :lol:  :lol:


:rollingeyes:   Is she serious Klaas?


Title: Lively Case Discussion #549 11/27 - 11/28/2006
Post by: klaasend on November 27, 2006, 10:48:39 PM
(http://i37.photobucket.com/albums/e82/klaasend2/bingo2-1.gif)


Title: Lively Case Discussion #549 11/27 - 11/28/2006
Post by: oldfart on November 27, 2006, 10:49:06 PM
Hey Monkeys,

Long time so see..  :oops:  :(
Hope everone is fine.

I was looking at Tv's at Best Buy   when I saw Beth on Fox News with Gag me a Ratings Spoon  :shock:  :shock:

Only caught bit & pieces but did I hear Beth say something about New Names that hindered the investigation and they are part of the Judical system???
Who >>>> please :!:

Just Wondering and thanks in advance  :)

OldF


Title: Lively Case Discussion #549 11/27 - 11/28/2006
Post by: snoopy on November 27, 2006, 10:49:10 PM
Hi Everybody!!  :D

I'm sooooo proud of ya'll that have worked so hard in seeking justice for Natalee.  I don't have much to contribute, but I am here as much as I can be for Natalee.

Throw Karin Jansen under the bus!!!!!! She makes me so sick.  I swear there is not a mean, vindictive bone in my body, but I hope she is financially, professionally, and emotionally ruined.  I truly hope this ruins her.

K.  Back to the corner.  

P.S.  I miss ya'll.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #549 11/27 - 11/28/2006
Post by: klaasend on November 27, 2006, 10:49:18 PM
Angie - yes she is.  Pretty pathetic huh?


Title: Lively Case Discussion #549 11/27 - 11/28/2006
Post by: Lala'sMom on November 27, 2006, 10:50:21 PM
Snoopy!!!!  Come back and speak to me....please....
 :lol:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #549 11/27 - 11/28/2006
Post by: WidgetTheMidget on November 27, 2006, 10:50:26 PM
Quote from: "Angiex911dsptchr"
Hi Widget!!  Nice to see you!!
Hope you are all doing well!! How are the girls  :)


Hi Angie .........

Good To See You Also .......

Hope All Is Well With You ...........

Things Going Great Here & The Girls Are Looking Forward To Summer Vacation ......... Our Summer Starts In December ..........

 8)


Title: Lively Case Discussion #549 11/27 - 11/28/2006
Post by: klaasend on November 27, 2006, 10:50:35 PM
Quote from: "oldfart"
Hey Monkeys,

Long time so see..  :oops:  :(
Hope everone is fine.

I was looking at Tv's at Best Buy   when I saw Beth on Fox News with Gag me a Ratings Spoon  :shock:  :shock:

Only caught bit & pieces but did I hear Beth say something about New Names that hindered the investigation and they are part of the Judical system???
Who >>>> please :!:

Just Wondering and thanks in advance  :)

OldF

Mostly Antonio Carlo - Joran's attorney and Karen Janssen.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #549 11/27 - 11/28/2006
Post by: Angiex911dsptchr on November 27, 2006, 10:51:13 PM
Quote from: "klaasend"
Angie - yes she is.  Pretty pathetic huh?


  Yes.. VERY!!


Title: Lively Case Discussion #549 11/27 - 11/28/2006
Post by: Angiex911dsptchr on November 27, 2006, 10:51:58 PM
Quote from: "Lala'sMom"
Snoopy!!!!  Come back and speak to me....please....
 :lol:


 sniff sniff.. you dont wub ME anymore?  LOL  I been trying to hug Nemo for you :)  :)  ROFL


Title: Lively Case Discussion #549 11/27 - 11/28/2006
Post by: Angiex911dsptchr on November 27, 2006, 10:52:57 PM
Quote from: "WidgetTheMidget"
Quote from: "Angiex911dsptchr"
Hi Widget!!  Nice to see you!!
Hope you are all doing well!! How are the girls  :)


Hi Angie .........

Good To See You Also .......

Hope All Is Well With You ...........

Things Going Great Here & The Girls Are Looking Forward To Summer Vacation ......... Our Summer Starts In December ..........

 8)


 Doing well here to Widgey.
GLAD to hear the girls are doing good and looking forward to their vacation!! God love'em!!


Title: Lively Case Discussion #549 11/27 - 11/28/2006
Post by: snoopy on November 27, 2006, 10:53:12 PM
Quote from: "Lala'sMom"
Snoopy!!!!  Come back and speak to me....please....
 :lol:


I'm here Lala's. Hope you are well.   Don't have a lot of time lately.  Got back from our cruise which was wonderful.  Came home to a destroyed laptop..........but thankfully Dell is going to replace it.  And taking care of my sister.  Hospice is coming in this week, but I want to help her, and spend time with her as much as I can.  Praying to get through Christmas.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #549 11/27 - 11/28/2006
Post by: oldfart on November 27, 2006, 10:53:22 PM
Quote from: "klaasend"
Quote from: "oldfart"
Hey Monkeys,

Long time so see..  :oops:  :(
Hope everone is fine.

I was looking at Tv's at Best Buy   when I saw Beth on Fox News with Gag me a Ratings Spoon  :shock:  :shock:

Only caught bit & pieces but did I hear Beth say something about New Names that hindered the investigation and they are part of the Judical system???
Who >>>> please :!:

Just Wondering and thanks in advance  :)

OldF

Mostly Antonio Carlo - Joran's attorney and Karen Janssen.


Klaasend
thanks...
I heard them mention someone at the Sloots when the warrant was served... could not make out the name but it did not sound familiar??


Title: Lively Case Discussion #549 11/27 - 11/28/2006
Post by: snoopy on November 27, 2006, 10:54:14 PM
Quote from: "Angiex911dsptchr"
Quote from: "Lala'sMom"
Snoopy!!!!  Come back and speak to me....please....
 :lol:


 sniff sniff.. you dont wub ME anymore?  LOL  I been trying to hug Nemo for you :)  :)  ROFL


Everybody wubs you Angie.  You silly monkey! :D


Title: Lively Case Discussion #549 11/27 - 11/28/2006
Post by: igsigs on November 27, 2006, 10:56:03 PM
Quote from: "klaasend"
Just posted on the front page of SM by Windy City: :lol:  :lol:

Nice plug from Beth on Greta!! Maybe next time VDS gives an idiot interview he’ll plug FOB and Refs!

Windy posts at REFS! :lol:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #549 11/27 - 11/28/2006
Post by: casa on November 27, 2006, 10:56:15 PM
Just running through to say hi and keep up the good work.  I read as much as I can but with two teaching jobs and my oldest daughter getting married I have been WAY too busy! Looking forward to Christmas vacation!


Title: Lively Case Discussion #549 11/27 - 11/28/2006
Post by: Kat_Gram on November 27, 2006, 10:56:52 PM
This " Book " of Joran's, it is still a go ? What he going to put in it ?
I just hope that the momentum from Devries continues.
I used to have faith in KJ, but it did not last more than a month.
Their court things are not open to the media so we don't know what she put forth, but it became obvious that she wasn't on the side of any kind of laws we are familiar with. I don't even know if they have the things in place like we do for freedom of information. Here, as a member of the public, I can go to our Court of Queen's bench and listen to tapes if I wanted to, or pay to get a transcipt.  
...  
Glad to see Metro & Widgie here  !  
..
There was a case in Belgium, the Marc Dutroux case. The public outrage in Belgium was so high that it was re investigated.
Hope for the same thing here in this case.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #549 11/27 - 11/28/2006
Post by: memphis on November 27, 2006, 10:57:17 PM
Quote from: "Lala'sMom"
Memphis
What is your question? I am back and ready to dance. :wink:


Sorry, was answering business emails.  :roll:

Are you still here?


Title: Lively Case Discussion #549 11/27 - 11/28/2006
Post by: Angiex911dsptchr on November 27, 2006, 10:57:27 PM
Quote from: "snoopy"
Quote from: "Angiex911dsptchr"
Quote from: "Lala'sMom"
Snoopy!!!!  Come back and speak to me....please....
 :lol:


 sniff sniff.. you dont wub ME anymore?  LOL  I been trying to hug Nemo for you :)  :)  ROFL


Everybody wubs you Angie.  You silly monkey! :D


 SNOOP DAWG~!!!!!!!  (hugs)  miss yah chicky!!  :)
What a great show huh?


Title: Lively Case Discussion #549 11/27 - 11/28/2006
Post by: Angiex911dsptchr on November 27, 2006, 10:58:52 PM
Quote from: "casa"
Just running through to say hi and keep up the good work.  I read as much as I can but with two teaching jobs and my oldest daughter getting married I have been WAY too busy! Looking forward to Christmas vacation!


 God Bless you Casa!!and Congrats!! Lots of work a wedding is!
Glad my daughters is over and 3 months later still in love bigtime.. LOL


Title: Lively Case Discussion #549 11/27 - 11/28/2006
Post by: snoopy on November 27, 2006, 10:59:17 PM
Quote from: "Angiex911dsptchr"
Quote from: "snoopy"
Quote from: "Angiex911dsptchr"
Quote from: "Lala'sMom"
Snoopy!!!!  Come back and speak to me....please....
 :lol:


 sniff sniff.. you dont wub ME anymore?  LOL  I been trying to hug Nemo for you :)  :)  ROFL


Everybody wubs you Angie.  You silly monkey! :D


 SNOOP DAWG~!!!!!!!  (hugs)  miss yah chicky!!  :)
What a great show huh?


It sure was!!  I was so happy for the heads up from Red.  I had just taken baby boys puuter away from him to get my monkey fix when Red posted that.  It gives me a little hope that Justice will be served.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #549 11/27 - 11/28/2006
Post by: Lala'sMom on November 27, 2006, 11:00:09 PM
Quote from: "memphis"
Quote from: "Lala'sMom"
Memphis
What is your question? I am back and ready to dance. :wink:


Sorry, was answering business emails.  :roll:

Are you still here?


Yes.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #549 11/27 - 11/28/2006
Post by: WidgetTheMidget on November 27, 2006, 11:00:45 PM
Quote from: "snoopy"
Quote from: "Angiex911dsptchr"
Quote from: "snoopy"
Quote from: "Angiex911dsptchr"
Quote from: "Lala'sMom"
Snoopy!!!!  Come back and speak to me....please....
 :lol:


 sniff sniff.. you dont wub ME anymore?  LOL  I been trying to hug Nemo for you :)  :)  ROFL


Everybody wubs you Angie.  You silly monkey! :D


 SNOOP DAWG~!!!!!!!  (hugs)  miss yah chicky!!  :)
What a great show huh?


It sure was!!  I was so happy for the heads up from Red.  I had just taken baby boys puuter away from him to get my monkey fix when Red posted that.  It gives me a little hope that Justice will be served.


Hi Snoop ..........

Good To See Ya ...........

 8)


Title: Lively Case Discussion #549 11/27 - 11/28/2006
Post by: Kat_Gram on November 27, 2006, 11:00:52 PM
Quote from: "oldfart"
Quote from: "klaasend"
Quote from: "oldfart"
Hey Monkeys,

Long time so see..  :oops:  :(
Hope everone is fine.

I was looking at Tv's at Best Buy   when I saw Beth on Fox News with Gag me a Ratings Spoon  :shock:  :shock:

Only caught bit & pieces but did I hear Beth say something about New Names that hindered the investigation and they are part of the Judical system???
Who >>>> please :!:

Just Wondering and thanks in advance  :)

OldF

Mostly Antonio Carlo - Joran's attorney and Karen Janssen.


Klaasend
thanks...
I heard them mention someone at the Sloots when the warrant was served... could not make out the name but it did not sound familiar??

Ben King, the director of the KIA prison was present in the apartment of Joran when the police did the warrant. Judge DeWitt limited it to just the living quarters of Joran.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #549 11/27 - 11/28/2006
Post by: Lala'sMom on November 27, 2006, 11:01:19 PM
Snoopy
{{{{{{{{{{{{{{HUGS}}}}}}}}}}}}}}

You know you can email me if you need to talk.  :wink:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #549 11/27 - 11/28/2006
Post by: oldfart on November 27, 2006, 11:02:49 PM
I'm out of the LOOP but still have to ask..

Has there been anything related to Natalee's case in any of the ARUBAN media outlets?  Anything at all???
And
When the heck was K.J. going to retire / resign?

TIA


Title: Lively Case Discussion #549 11/27 - 11/28/2006
Post by: Lala'sMom on November 27, 2006, 11:03:14 PM
Angie
You know I love ya!  I saw you hugging Nemo this weekend...thanks a bunch.

BTW  Nemo's mom!!! Here's calling you out, girl.  Let me know how you are.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #549 11/27 - 11/28/2006
Post by: snoopy on November 27, 2006, 11:03:44 PM
It's good to see you too Widget.  It's good to see all of you.  I can't believe another Thanksgiving has passed.  This time last year we were planning cookbooks, Rob's great Turkey stories..........and we're still here.  We must see this through.

As Peaches says........I'd like to slap some people silly.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #549 11/27 - 11/28/2006
Post by: klaasend on November 27, 2006, 11:05:01 PM
Quote from: "oldfart"
I'm out of the LOOP but still have to ask..

Has there been anything related to Natalee's case in any of the ARUBAN media outlets?  Anything at all???
And
When the heck was K.J. going to retire / resign?

TIA


Nope but there will probably be something tomorrow about the De Vries show.

Not sure about KJ, they lie alot in Aruba so it's hard to tell when she's leaving.  :wink:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #549 11/27 - 11/28/2006
Post by: oldfart on November 27, 2006, 11:05:12 PM
Quote from: "Kat_Gram"
Quote from: "oldfart"
Quote from: "klaasend"
Quote from: "oldfart"

<<snip>>

OldF

Mostly Antonio Carlo - Joran's attorney and Karen Janssen.


Klaasend
thanks...
I heard them mention someone at the Sloots when the warrant was served... could not make out the name but it did not sound familiar??

Ben King, the director of the KIA prison was present in the apartment of Joran when the police did the warrant. Judge DeWitt limited it to just the living quarters of Joran.

Kat_Gram
As I said I did not hear everything but I thought they were saying the person that opened the door at the Sloots  ...limited the search to only Joran's apt. ???


Title: Lively Case Discussion #549 11/27 - 11/28/2006
Post by: Angiex911dsptchr on November 27, 2006, 11:05:29 PM
Snoopy  I have a good feeling Justice WILL be served!! :)
Lalas  ROFL  :)
OldFart  KJ prob has a depend on right now... bet alot fo them are chittin their pants BIGTIME!


Title: Lively Case Discussion #549 11/27 - 11/28/2006
Post by: snoopy on November 27, 2006, 11:05:37 PM
Quote from: "Lala'sMom"
Snoopy
{{{{{{{{{{{{{{HUGS}}}}}}}}}}}}}}

You know you can email me if you need to talk.  :wink:


{{{{{HUGS}}}}}} back atcha girlfriend.  I'll email ya in the next coupl;e of days.  I only have 200 sumpin to return!  :lol:  :lol:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #549 11/27 - 11/28/2006
Post by: snoopy on November 27, 2006, 11:07:33 PM
Quote from: "Angiex911dsptchr"
Snoopy  I have a good feeling Justice WILL be served!! :)
Lalas  ROFL  :)
OldFart  KJ prob has a depend on right now... bet alot fo them are chittin their pants BIGTIME!


I think so too.   What's that ya'll say.......sumbeach?  She better get a whole lotta them depends.  She gonna need em.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #549 11/27 - 11/28/2006
Post by: Kat_Gram on November 27, 2006, 11:09:06 PM
And OFart, Joran got a couple of photos of Natalee's New Years Eve Party 2004 photoshopped with himself in it. !
From what we have so far from Devries, it appears as if he has found conflicts of interest between some of the major players in the investigation. Ben King worked for the PG of Aruba, Therese Fernadez Croes and is a good buddy of Paulus. He ( Ben ) is very high up in the food chain in the Aruba Justice Ministry. Looks as if , to me, as if the investigation was hindered by the higher ups who were friends of Paulus.
There is more, but we haven't had the full transcripts from the Devries show.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #549 11/27 - 11/28/2006
Post by: Ono on November 27, 2006, 11:10:38 PM
Quote from: "nonesuche"
Did you notice how Greta used her dismissive tone to say "I hope someone helps you" at the end? Not perhaps we can help you more now, or perhaps we weren't as effective as we might have been.......nada from the ice queen Greta.


Yes..Greta was cold as a cucumber. It's pretty obvious to her now that Joran made an ass out of her.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #549 11/27 - 11/28/2006
Post by: Angiex911dsptchr on November 27, 2006, 11:11:33 PM
Quote from: "snoopy"
Quote from: "Angiex911dsptchr"
Snoopy  I have a good feeling Justice WILL be served!! :)
Lalas  ROFL  :)
OldFart  KJ prob has a depend on right now... bet alot fo them are chittin their pants BIGTIME!


I think so too.   What's that ya'll say.......sumbeach?  She better get a whole lotta them depends.  She gonna need em.


  :) :) Snoop Dawg!


Title: Lively Case Discussion #549 11/27 - 11/28/2006
Post by: crazybabyborg on November 27, 2006, 11:12:31 PM
Hi! Wouldn't you think that after all this time when Nat's case was silenced on MSM, that I could manage to watch the show uninterrupted by a phone call??? I'll catch it in the repeat, but appreciate the comments here so I can follow along!

I decorated my avatar for Christmas, (put back on the gold shiny dress and gave Marilyn a big shiny red ornament) and now I can't get it to load. I've been debugged and left all nekky!!! :shock:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #549 11/27 - 11/28/2006
Post by: Ono on November 27, 2006, 11:12:41 PM
Quote from: "BTgirl"
Quote from: "memphis"
Quote from: "igsigs"
Greta should be embarrassed.

De Vries accomplished more in a few weeks than she did in 18 months.


Thank you!!   :roll:


I thought Greta's face and hair looked kind of plain and bland tonight. Wait - maybe it was just indigestion from eating that tough old crow.


And there has been a time when Greta hasn't looked plain and bland ??? :lol:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #549 11/27 - 11/28/2006
Post by: cubbeegirl on November 27, 2006, 11:13:04 PM
Quote from: "Ono"
Quote from: "nonesuche"
Did you notice how Greta used her dismissive tone to say "I hope someone helps you" at the end? Not perhaps we can help you more now, or perhaps we weren't as effective as we might have been.......nada from the ice queen Greta.


Yes..Greta was cold as a cucumber. It's pretty obvious to her now that Joran made an ass out of her.



Yup.... in front of the whole world ....


Title: Lively Case Discussion #549 11/27 - 11/28/2006
Post by: Ono on November 27, 2006, 11:15:57 PM
Quote from: "Carnut"
Quote from: "Red"
I would just like to say thank you to Klaas for all the hard work she put forth on the statements.

Way to go ... Time well spent.

Klaas rocks  :wink:


You did notice Beth's mention of SM didn't you?


Yes! It was great!


Title: King
Post by: IBE on November 27, 2006, 11:16:08 PM
And it was King who changed his name after the Mathews case?

Where human rights were proofed to be violated and I think, evidence was changed or lost. I believe that Paulus van der Sloot also worked on that case with King.

Also, wasn't it King withwhom the Sloots stayed while Joran was in prison? using the excuse of staying away from the media at their home and the cementing of the pool area?

Correct me if I am wrong. Thanks

IBE


Title: Lively Case Discussion #549 11/27 - 11/28/2006
Post by: crazybabyborg on November 27, 2006, 11:16:19 PM
Forgive the fluff, but since the interview for me was a "visual" only, I must say that Beth LOOKED great! Knowing what she has been through, I am encouraged and comforted once again by her remarkable strength and hope and pray she is doing as well as possible.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #549 11/27 - 11/28/2006
Post by: snoopy on November 27, 2006, 11:16:30 PM
I noticed that nothing was said about Jan Van der Straaten in all this.  I wonder where he plays into all of this madness?


Title: Lively Case Discussion #549 11/27 - 11/28/2006
Post by: klaasend on November 27, 2006, 11:17:02 PM
Quote from: "crazybabyborg"
Hi! Wouldn't you think that after all this time when Nat's case was silenced on MSM, that I could manage to watch the show uninterrupted by a phone call??? I'll catch it in the repeat, but appreciate the comments here so I can follow along!

I decorated my avatar for Christmas, (put back on the gold shiny dress and gave Marilyn a big shiny red ornament) and now I can't get it to load. I've been debugged and left all nekky!!! :shock:


You need to remember, only from photobucket and in the THIRD option in your profile for avatars.  Use the url from photobucket without the IMG tags.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #549 11/27 - 11/28/2006
Post by: oldfart on November 27, 2006, 11:17:53 PM
Well Monkeys ... Need to go :(

I hope to get my mindset where I can post more often and be ON Topic :shock:
anyway... Monkeys.. Take care & keep the faith  

SeeeYaaByeeeeeeeee all

OldF


Title: Lively Case Discussion #549 11/27 - 11/28/2006
Post by: Lala'sMom on November 27, 2006, 11:18:43 PM
Well, all us monkeys tried to tell Greta Joran was just yanking her chain...but did she listen?  Noooooooooo. I bet she was miffed about the "he wasn't at the beach" story.  After all she was assured by the delicious sporter that he lost his shoes there.  That Satish came back to puck him up and then went back later to get his shoes...  I hope Greta has something for that upset stomach of hers tonight...I bet crow doesn't taste very good.  :wink:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #549 11/27 - 11/28/2006
Post by: snoopy on November 27, 2006, 11:18:51 PM
Quote from: "Ono"
Quote from: "Carnut"
Quote from: "Red"
I would just like to say thank you to Klaas for all the hard work she put forth on the statements.

Way to go ... Time well spent.

Klaas rocks  :wink:


You did notice Beth's mention of SM didn't you?


Yes! It was great!


When Beth said that I was so proud of ya'll.

Where would we be without Klaas?  You're wonderful, lady.  Really.

And thank you so much Red and Tom.

Ya'll are the best!!!


Title: Re: King
Post by: snoopy on November 27, 2006, 11:19:53 PM
Quote from: "IBE"
And it was King who changed his name after the Mathews case?

Where human rights were proofed to be violated and I think, evidence was changed or lost. I believe that Paulus van der Sloot also worked on that case with King.

Also, wasn't it King withwhom the Sloots stayed while Joran was in prison? using the excuse of staying away from the media at their home and the cementing of the pool area?

Correct me if I am wrong. Thanks

IBE


Ding Ding Ding Ding.   I believe you are correct Ibe! :D


Title: Lively Case Discussion #549 11/27 - 11/28/2006
Post by: crazybabyborg on November 27, 2006, 11:20:33 PM
Quote from: "klaasend"
Quote from: "crazybabyborg"
Hi! Wouldn't you think that after all this time when Nat's case was silenced on MSM, that I could manage to watch the show uninterrupted by a phone call??? I'll catch it in the repeat, but appreciate the comments here so I can follow along!

I decorated my avatar for Christmas, (put back on the gold shiny dress and gave Marilyn a big shiny red ornament) and now I can't get it to load. I've been debugged and left all nekky!!! :shock:


You need to remember, only from photobucket and in the THIRD option in your profile for avatars.  Use the url from photobucket without the IMG tags.


OH, KLAAS, YOU ROCK!!! Thanky, sir! :wink:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #549 11/27 - 11/28/2006
Post by: cubbeegirl on November 27, 2006, 11:20:57 PM
Quote from: "snoopy"
Quote from: "Ono"
Quote from: "Carnut"
Quote from: "Red"
I would just like to say thank you to Klaas for all the hard work she put forth on the statements.

Way to go ... Time well spent.

Klaas rocks  :wink:


You did notice Beth's mention of SM didn't you?


Yes! It was great!


When Beth said that I was so proud of ya'll.

Where would we be without Klaas?  You're wonderful, lady.  Really.

And thank you so much Red and Tom.

Ya'll are the best!!!



ummm Snoop, you didn't know that klaas was a male?  :wink:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #549 11/27 - 11/28/2006
Post by: snoopy on November 27, 2006, 11:21:02 PM
Quote from: "oldfart"
Well Monkeys ... Need to go :(

I hope to get my mindset where I can post more often and be ON Topic :shock:
anyway... Monkeys.. Take care & keep the faith  

SeeeYaaByeeeeeeeee all

OldF


It's good to see you man.  Good night.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #549 11/27 - 11/28/2006
Post by: snoopy on November 27, 2006, 11:23:15 PM
Quote from: "cubbeegirl"
Quote from: "snoopy"
Quote from: "Ono"
Quote from: "Carnut"
Quote from: "Red"
I would just like to say thank you to Klaas for all the hard work she put forth on the statements.

Way to go ... Time well spent.

Klaas rocks  :wink:


You did notice Beth's mention of SM didn't you?


Yes! It was great!


When Beth said that I was so proud of ya'll.

Where would we be without Klaas?  You're wonderful, lady.  Really.

And thank you so much Red and Tom.

Ya'll are the best!!!



ummm Snoop, you didn't know that klaas was a male?  :wink:



 :shock:  :shock:  :shock:  WTH???? you ain't serious, right?

Are you messin with me????? :lol:

 8)

Rock On!!  8)


Title: Lively Case Discussion #549 11/27 - 11/28/2006
Post by: klaasend on November 27, 2006, 11:25:04 PM
(http://i37.photobucket.com/albums/e82/klaasend2/JoranRun2.gif)


Title: Lively Case Discussion #549 11/27 - 11/28/2006
Post by: snoopy on November 27, 2006, 11:26:11 PM
Quote from: "klaasend"
(http://i37.photobucket.com/albums/e82/klaasend2/JoranRun2.gif)


 :lol:  :lol:  :lol:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #549 11/27 - 11/28/2006
Post by: klaasend on November 27, 2006, 11:26:46 PM
Thanks everyone!

Yes, I am a girl..not a guy  :lol:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #549 11/27 - 11/28/2006
Post by: memphis on November 27, 2006, 11:26:56 PM
Quote from: "snoopy"
I noticed that nothing was said about Jan Van der Straaten in all this.  I wonder where he plays into all of this madness?


 :shock: Could Shango have been wrong?  :shock:   :lol:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #549 11/27 - 11/28/2006
Post by: San on November 27, 2006, 11:27:09 PM
PART I

A Little from Greta – 11/27/06

Peter De Vries

Greta:  Tonight a Natalee Holloway bombshell.  Did Joran Van Der Sloot a prime suspect actually play a big part in Natalee’s disappearance and did his lawyer know about it?  A Dutch TV show claims to have expose some never before seen or hear information.  Earlier we spoke to Peter De Vries a crime reporter in Holland who conducted the investigation for the show.

Greta:  What do you think is the single biggest thing that surprised you about this investigation?

Peter:  Well one of the biggest thing we found out that Joran’s lawyer Mr. Antonio Carlo paid a secret visit to the head prosecutor Karin Janssen because he wanted to clear his conscience that’s what he said.  And this is strange because according to the Dutch Law and rules it is highly unusual for lawyers and public prosecutors to meet during an investigation, it’s not done.  But Mr. Carlo insisted to have a talk with Head Prosecutor and then well she says OK come along to my office and we will have a talk and when he went there they had that talk and then he said well I want you to know that my client Joran Van der Sloot played a major part in the disappearance of Natalee Holloway.  And then he stated that it was of course up to the police to get the full proof of this.  But that’s what he said and later months later the Head Prosecutor wrote him a letter and asked lawyer to give more details about what he had said and then the lawyer got scared at moment because he was thinking he supposed that it was a top secret meeting in the past and now it was suddenly on paper so he wrote back and said no I think you must have misunderstood me and he denied everything.

Greta:  When was this meeting between Joran Van der Sloot’s lawyer and the prosecutor?  Now Natalee of course disappeared at the end of May 2005.  When in relationship of the disappearance.

Peter:  Oh it was very short after his arrest so in June 2005.

Greta:  Did you confront Joran Van der Sloot’s lawyer about this and say did this happen?

Peter:  Yeah I went to his office when I was at Aruba and with a candid camera with me and then he admitted that he had a meeting the with Head Prosecutor and that they wrote letters to each other and he was very confused, he was in panic when I told him what I knew and I also wrote a letter to the Head Prosecutor and she also admits that there was a meeting and that there is now disagree about what had happened then.

Greta:  Do you know Peter is there some rule that prevents Karin Janssen the prosecutor from talking to the public or at least revealing some information sort of get some mystery out of the investigation?

Peter:  In Holland it is absolutely not done for a lawyer to talk to a prosecutor during an investigation, it is not allowed.

Greta:  What about a search of the Van der Sloot property.  Was that ever done and was it including sort of the cabana area where Joran lives.

Peter:  Well the search in the home address of the family Van der Sloot is very strange because the search warrant was made by Head Prosecutor Karin Janssen and contained an allowance to search the whole address Mon 19.  But when the police was on the spot another high ranking employee of the Justice Office it was Mr. Bob Witt reduced the search warrant to only the room of Joran and that’s very strange.  The police was extremely frustrated about this because they had some clues that something might have happened to Natalee elsewhere in the garden or in the house of the parents because Joran admits that he has been with Natalee and Deepak and Satish at the home of his parents.

Greta:  You know many Americans when they think of this investigation they think corruption.  In your investigative journalism did you find any evidence to support the suspicion that there is corruption within the investigation whether it be at the police level or the government level or any level at all.

Peter:  Well corruption is a very heavy word I think.  What I think is that it’s a small island everybody knows each other that’s the problem.  When the police arrived that the Van der Sloot’s home for the search to their surprise the door was not open father or mother Van der Sloot but a close friend of them.  The close friend is somebody who works at the justice department at Aruba so that’s strange.  The police was amazed what is he doing here and then he told them yeah I’m a very good friend of the family and I want to support them in these hard times.  So you get the impression that everybody is knowing each other is helping each other and well that’s not good for a fair investigation I think.

Greta:  Peter I’ve been very hard or aggressive in my words towards Karin Janssen the prosecutor and maybe in part she can’t talk as you noted earlier because of the rules there.  From your investigation are you satisfied she has done everything she should and should have been done to try and solve this disappearance?

Peter:  No I’m not.  I think the Justice Department could have done a lot more and I think it’s still not too late to solve this crime and they make mistakes they didn’t do things they should have done and that’s a pity.

Greta:  Did your investigation establish with any level of certainty whether Natalee even made it to the beach that night.

Peter:  No what I figured out that the police is thinking at this moment that Natalee hadn’t been on the beach that night at all and that somewhere else something might have happened but not on the beach.  They don’t believe the story anymore.

Greta:  Do they still focus simply on Joran, Satish and Deepak or are they still keeping the possibility open that there is some other explanation somebody else got to Natalee.

Peter:  No No the police are still focused on Joran Van der Sloot and Deepak and Satish there is no doubt about that.

Joining us Live from Alabama is Natalee’s mother Beth Holloway Twitty:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #549 11/27 - 11/28/2006
Post by: crazybabyborg on November 27, 2006, 11:27:30 PM
OMG!!!  That's the academy award of them all, Klaas!!!!

Give her/him the oscar!!  (http://i25.photobucket.com/albums/c100/crazybabyborgs/a_hail.gif)


Title: Lively Case Discussion #549 11/27 - 11/28/2006
Post by: memphis on November 27, 2006, 11:27:31 PM
Quote from: "snoopy"
I noticed that nothing was said about Jan Van der Straaten in all this.  I wonder where he plays into all of this madness?


 :shock: Could Shango have been wrong?  :shock:   :lol:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #549 11/27 - 11/28/2006
Post by: Ono on November 27, 2006, 11:27:38 PM
Quote from: "cubbeegirl"
Quote from: "Ono"
Quote from: "nonesuche"
Did you notice how Greta used her dismissive tone to say "I hope someone helps you" at the end? Not perhaps we can help you more now, or perhaps we weren't as effective as we might have been.......nada from the ice queen Greta.


Yes..Greta was cold as a cucumber. It's pretty obvious to her now that Joran made an ass out of her.



Yup.... in front of the whole world ....


Greta looked really pissed, I thought.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #549 11/27 - 11/28/2006
Post by: snoopy on November 27, 2006, 11:28:00 PM
Quote from: "klaasend"
Thanks everyone!

Yes, I am a girl..not a guy  :lol:


Well I knew that silly.  I knew they were messin with me!!!!  :lol:  :lol:

Geez I'm tired.  :shock:  :roll:  :lol:  :wink:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #549 11/27 - 11/28/2006
Post by: snoopy on November 27, 2006, 11:29:25 PM
Quote from: "memphis"
Quote from: "snoopy"
I noticed that nothing was said about Jan Van der Straaten in all this.  I wonder where he plays into all of this madness?


 :shock: Could Shango have been wrong?  :shock:   :lol:


Say it ain't so!! :lol:  :lol:


Title: Re: King
Post by: Kat_Gram on November 27, 2006, 11:29:35 PM
Quote from: "IBE"
And it was King who changed his name after the Mathews case?

Where human rights were proofed to be violated and I think, evidence was changed or lost. I believe that Paulus van der Sloot also worked on that case with King.

Also, wasn't it King withwhom the Sloots stayed while Joran was in prison? using the excuse of staying away from the media at their home and the cementing of the pool area?

Correct me if I am wrong. Thanks

IBE

You are 100 % correct. His name used to be Ben Voking.
He was on leave when this happened, but neverless, still employed by the Ministry. Therese Fernandez Croes " was not happy " with him.
I need to wait for whole translation, but right now, it appears as if the investigation was being directed by the suspects family friends. IMO right now.
But then, we all knew that something stank like Gouda cheese left in the sun tooooooooooooooooo  long . All the court decisions, the search warrants, the going to court and the fact the Sloot property cannot be searched again were all weighted in the Sloots favor.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #549 11/27 - 11/28/2006
Post by: snoopy on November 27, 2006, 11:29:57 PM
Quote from: "Ono"
Quote from: "cubbeegirl"
Quote from: "Ono"
Quote from: "nonesuche"
Did you notice how Greta used her dismissive tone to say "I hope someone helps you" at the end? Not perhaps we can help you more now, or perhaps we weren't as effective as we might have been.......nada from the ice queen Greta.


Yes..Greta was cold as a cucumber. It's pretty obvious to her now that Joran made an ass out of her.



Yup.... in front of the whole world ....


Greta looked really pissed, I thought.


Yea and stupid ain't pretty.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #549 11/27 - 11/28/2006
Post by: Ono on November 27, 2006, 11:30:53 PM
Quote from: "klaasend"
(http://i37.photobucket.com/albums/e82/klaasend2/JoranRun2.gif)


 :lol:  :lol:  :lol: I just love this!


Title: Lively Case Discussion #549 11/27 - 11/28/2006
Post by: klaasend on November 27, 2006, 11:31:40 PM
Thanks San!


Title: Lively Case Discussion #549 11/27 - 11/28/2006
Post by: snoopy on November 27, 2006, 11:32:26 PM
Quote from: "klaasend"
Thanks San!


Yep.. Thank you San.  :D


Title: Lively Case Discussion #549 11/27 - 11/28/2006
Post by: bleachedblack on November 27, 2006, 11:32:39 PM
Klaas I love the tanks added to the back-ground!

Little OT trivia(?) Was checking out todays Diario., the obituaries to be exact.
Out of the 5 recent deaths listed, 3 have the last name Croes!


Title: Lively Case Discussion #549 11/27 - 11/28/2006
Post by: hummingbird7525 on November 27, 2006, 11:32:50 PM
:lol: Hi to all of you Monkeys:
You all should be so proud of yourselves. Each and every one of you! I've been reading and reading for 18 months, I've listened to all of you and your thoughts of what might have happened to Natalee. I must say that you all blow me away at how right on the money you have been.  I can't go to those other sites, cuz I get to angry, but I have read some at BFN, I didn't connect there.  You all are truly amazing people.  Red, Tom, Mrs. and KLAAS, YOU REALLY DO ROCK! Hope it doesnt sound selfish on my part, but thanks for giving me a place to go  to EVERYDAY to help myself heal because of my heartbreak for Natalee and her family.  As I watched Beth tonight, with tears streaming down my face, in awe of her strength.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #549 11/27 - 11/28/2006
Post by: snoopy on November 27, 2006, 11:34:17 PM
Quote from: "hummingbird7525"
:lol: Hi to all of you Monkeys:
You all should be so proud of yourselves. Each and every one of you! I've been reading and reading for 18 months, I've listened to all of you and your thoughts of what might have happened to Natalee. I must say that you all blow me away at how right on the money you have been.  I can't go to those other sites, cuz I get to angry, but I have read some at BFN, I didn't connect there.  You all are truly amazing people.  Red, Tom, Mrs. and KLAAS, YOU REALLY DO ROCK! Hope it doesnt sound selfish on my part, but thanks for giving me a place to go  to EVERYDAY to help myself heal because of my heartbreak for Natalee and her family.  As I watched Beth tonight, with tears streaming down my face, in awe of her strength.


Well said hummingbird.  My sentiments exactly. :wink:


Title: Shango
Post by: IBE on November 27, 2006, 11:36:15 PM
Did Shango say Dirty Hand or Hands?

Seems as if serveral need some Dial soap in Aruba and I hope not in Holland; but isn't the judicial and enforcement areas overseen by them?


Title: Lively Case Discussion #549 11/27 - 11/28/2006
Post by: crazybabyborg on November 27, 2006, 11:36:22 PM
OK................once and for all I'm going to settle the "Klaas gender controversy". Forgive me, Klaas, but just this once I'm posting this pic from your private album. It's time for a full view for all to see. It leaves no doubt...........

(http://i25.photobucket.com/albums/c100/crazybabyborgs/sexymonkey.jpg)

 :lol:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #549 11/27 - 11/28/2006
Post by: klaasend on November 27, 2006, 11:37:26 PM
CBB  :lol:  :lol:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #549 11/27 - 11/28/2006
Post by: Lala'sMom on November 27, 2006, 11:39:46 PM
Quote from: "snoopy"
Quote from: "memphis"
Quote from: "snoopy"
I noticed that nothing was said about Jan Van der Straaten in all this.  I wonder where he plays into all of this madness?


 :shock: Could Shango have been wrong?  :shock:   :lol:


Say it ain't so!! :lol:  :lol:


If you remember Shango never said it was van der Straaten.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #549 11/27 - 11/28/2006
Post by: Ono on November 27, 2006, 11:40:23 PM
Quote from: "snoopy"
Quote from: "klaasend"
Thanks San!


Yep.. Thank you San.  :D


Me too San. I missed a little of the beginning and am glad you took notes.


Title: Hanes
Post by: IBE on November 27, 2006, 11:42:15 PM
Is she wearing Hayes? too with the high heels? :lol:  :lol:

Great pict!

Don't mess with Klass!


Title: Lively Case Discussion #549 11/27 - 11/28/2006
Post by: Ono on November 27, 2006, 11:42:22 PM
Quote from: "hummingbird7525"
:lol: Hi to all of you Monkeys:
You all should be so proud of yourselves. Each and every one of you! I've been reading and reading for 18 months, I've listened to all of you and your thoughts of what might have happened to Natalee. I must say that you all blow me away at how right on the money you have been.  I can't go to those other sites, cuz I get to angry, but I have read some at BFN, I didn't connect there.  You all are truly amazing people.  Red, Tom, Mrs. and KLAAS, YOU REALLY DO ROCK! Hope it doesnt sound selfish on my part, but thanks for giving me a place to go  to EVERYDAY to help myself heal because of my heartbreak for Natalee and her family.  As I watched Beth tonight, with tears streaming down my face, in awe of her strength.


Hi Hummingbird.  :D


Title: Lively Case Discussion #549 11/27 - 11/28/2006
Post by: snoopy on November 27, 2006, 11:42:23 PM
Quote from: "crazybabyborg"
OK................once and for all I'm going to settle the "Klaas gender controversy". Forgive me, Klaas, but just this once I'm posting this pic from your private album. It's time for a full view for all to see. It leaves no doubt...........

(http://i25.photobucket.com/albums/c100/crazybabyborgs/sexymonkey.jpg)

 :lol:


Holy Crap!!!  :lol:  
 I'll never look at Klaas the same way again.  Oh my!!  :lol:  :lol:  :lol:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #549 11/27 - 11/28/2006
Post by: Lala'sMom on November 27, 2006, 11:42:32 PM
Quote from: "crazybabyborg"
OK................once and for all I'm going to settle the "Klaas gender controversy". Forgive me, Klaas, but just this once I'm posting this pic from your private album. It's time for a full view for all to see. It leaves no doubt...........

(http://i25.photobucket.com/albums/c100/crazybabyborgs/sexymonkey.jpg)

 :lol:


No wonder you are so popular at college.  :wink:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #549 11/27 - 11/28/2006
Post by: Carnut on November 27, 2006, 11:43:25 PM
Quote from: "Lala'sMom"
Quote from: "snoopy"
Quote from: "memphis"
Quote from: "snoopy"
I noticed that nothing was said about Jan Van der Straaten in all this.  I wonder where he plays into all of this madness?


 :shock: Could Shango have been wrong?  :shock:   :lol:


Say it ain't so!! :lol:  :lol:


If you remember Shango never said it was van der Straaten.


Kinda because shango never really said much of anything.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #549 11/27 - 11/28/2006
Post by: cubbeegirl on November 27, 2006, 11:43:51 PM
Quote from: "hummingbird7525"
:lol: Hi to all of you Monkeys:
You all should be so proud of yourselves. Each and every one of you! I've been reading and reading for 18 months, I've listened to all of you and your thoughts of what might have happened to Natalee. I must say that you all blow me away at how right on the money you have been.  I can't go to those other sites, cuz I get to angry, but I have read some at BFN, I didn't connect there.  You all are truly amazing people.  Red, Tom, Mrs. and KLAAS, YOU REALLY DO ROCK! Hope it doesnt sound selfish on my part, but thanks for giving me a place to go  to EVERYDAY to help myself heal because of my heartbreak for Natalee and her family.  As I watched Beth tonight, with tears streaming down my face, in awe of her strength.



Hi Hummingbird... you are right , klaas really does rock....


Title: Lively Case Discussion #549 11/27 - 11/28/2006
Post by: Ono on November 27, 2006, 11:45:16 PM
Quote from: "snoopy"
Quote from: "crazybabyborg"
OK................once and for all I'm going to settle the "Klaas gender controversy". Forgive me, Klaas, but just this once I'm posting this pic from your private album. It's time for a full view for all to see. It leaves no doubt...........

(http://i25.photobucket.com/albums/c100/crazybabyborgs/sexymonkey.jpg)

 :lol:


Holy Crap!!!  :lol:  
 I'll never look at Klaas the same way again.  Oh my!!  :lol:  :lol:  :lol:


BAWAHAHAHA! Lets don't ever look at her ! :lol:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #549 11/27 - 11/28/2006
Post by: snoopy on November 27, 2006, 11:46:23 PM
Quote from: "Lala'sMom"
Quote from: "snoopy"
Quote from: "memphis"
Quote from: "snoopy"
I noticed that nothing was said about Jan Van der Straaten in all this.  I wonder where he plays into all of this madness?


 :shock: Could Shango have been wrong?  :shock:   :lol:


Say it ain't so!! :lol:  :lol:


If you remember Shango never said it was van der Straaten.


I know Lala's.  You know I'm a Shango believer.   :wink:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #549 11/27 - 11/28/2006
Post by: Angiex911dsptchr on November 27, 2006, 11:47:08 PM
Oh heck.. who used to use that AVI here??   grrrrrrrrr..
Rooscrew?   I always laughed at it!


Title: Lively Case Discussion #549 11/27 - 11/28/2006
Post by: snoopy on November 27, 2006, 11:47:39 PM
Quote from: "Ono"
Quote from: "snoopy"
Quote from: "crazybabyborg"
OK................once and for all I'm going to settle the "Klaas gender controversy". Forgive me, Klaas, but just this once I'm posting this pic from your private album. It's time for a full view for all to see. It leaves no doubt...........

(http://i25.photobucket.com/albums/c100/crazybabyborgs/sexymonkey.jpg)

 :lol:


Holy Crap!!!  :lol:  
 I'll never look at Klaas the same way again.  Oh my!!  :lol:  :lol:  :lol:


BAWAHAHAHA! Lets don't ever look at her ! :lol:


You got that right!!! eeeewwweeee.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #549 11/27 - 11/28/2006
Post by: cubbeegirl on November 27, 2006, 11:48:02 PM
Quote from: "Angiex911dsptchr"
Oh heck.. who used to use that AVI here??   grrrrrrrrr..
Rooscrew?   I always laughed at it!



I remember it from way back when angie.... LOL


Title: Lively Case Discussion #549 11/27 - 11/28/2006
Post by: klaasend on November 27, 2006, 11:48:13 PM
Quote from: "Angiex911dsptchr"
Oh heck.. who used to use that AVI here??   grrrrrrrrr..
Rooscrew?   I always laughed at it!

Yep, that's who it was!


Title: Lively Case Discussion #549 11/27 - 11/28/2006
Post by: Angiex911dsptchr on November 27, 2006, 11:50:04 PM
Quote from: "klaasend"
Quote from: "Angiex911dsptchr"
Oh heck.. who used to use that AVI here??   grrrrrrrrr..
Rooscrew?   I always laughed at it!

Yep, that's who it was!


  Hi Cubbe sweety!!!!!
LOL Klaas..  I thougt so. but wasnt 100% sure.  :)
You be a sexy  SHIM Klaas!!  ROFL


Title: Lively Case Discussion #549 11/27 - 11/28/2006
Post by: snoopy on November 27, 2006, 11:50:05 PM
Lala's.......put KJ into the mix with Dirtyhand.  I don't have my notes and such handy, but that might just fit.  Never considered her.  hhhmmmm. :wink:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #549 11/27 - 11/28/2006
Post by: Lala'sMom on November 27, 2006, 11:51:35 PM
Memphis
Are you doubting Shango now? :lol:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #549 11/27 - 11/28/2006
Post by: cubbeegirl on November 27, 2006, 11:51:47 PM
Quote from: "Angiex911dsptchr"
Quote from: "klaasend"
Quote from: "Angiex911dsptchr"
Oh heck.. who used to use that AVI here??   grrrrrrrrr..
Rooscrew?   I always laughed at it!

Yep, that's who it was!


  Hi Cubbe sweety!!!!!
LOL Klaas..  I thougt so. but wasnt 100% sure.  :)
You be a sexy  SHIM Klaas!!  ROFL



Hey chicky!


Title: Lively Case Discussion #549 11/27 - 11/28/2006
Post by: Lala'sMom on November 27, 2006, 11:52:12 PM
Quote from: "snoopy"
Lala's.......put KJ into the mix with Dirtyhand.  I don't have my notes and such handy, but that might just fit.  Never considered her.  hhhmmmm. :wink:


BRB I think you might like this...


Title: Lively Case Discussion #549 11/27 - 11/28/2006
Post by: snoopy on November 27, 2006, 11:52:35 PM
Quote from: "Lala'sMom"
Quote from: "snoopy"
Lala's.......put KJ into the mix with Dirtyhand.  I don't have my notes and such handy, but that might just fit.  Never considered her.  hhhmmmm. :wink:


BRB I think you might like this...


K


Title: Lively Case Discussion #549 11/27 - 11/28/2006
Post by: Angiex911dsptchr on November 27, 2006, 11:53:51 PM
Quote from: "snoopy"
Lala's.......put KJ into the mix with Dirtyhand.  I don't have my notes and such handy, but that might just fit.  Never considered her.  hhhmmmm. :wink:


 Me either Lalas and Snoop Dawg..  I always thought it was a male!


Title: KJ
Post by: IBE on November 27, 2006, 11:54:28 PM
While I am not always a K J fan... doesn't she work on the information that the ALE gives her? And if so, how could she work with left-out, or misinformation or no info from ALA?

Then there's probably a big pressure from the Dutch Clan, IMO


Title: Lively Case Discussion #549 11/27 - 11/28/2006
Post by: hummingbird7525 on November 27, 2006, 11:54:39 PM
Quote from: "Ono"
Quote from: "hummingbird7525"
:lol: Hi to all of you Monkeys:
You all should be so proud of yourselves. Each and every one of you! I've been reading and reading for 18 months, I've listened to all of you and your thoughts of what might have happened to Natalee. I must say that you all blow me away at how right on the money you have been.  I can't go to those other sites, cuz I get to angry, but I have read some at BFN, I didn't connect there.  You all are truly amazing people.  Red, Tom, Mrs. and KLAAS, YOU REALLY DO ROCK! Hope it doesnt sound selfish on my part, but thanks for giving me a place to go  to EVERYDAY to help myself heal because of my heartbreak for Natalee and her family.  As I watched Beth tonight, with tears streaming down my face, in awe of her strength.


Hi Hummingbird.  :D


Hi Ono,
You all are so happy and up tonight and well you should be.  I can't seem to stop bawling.  Oh well, I've had these kinda nights before. It will pass.


Title: Re: KJ
Post by: klaasend on November 27, 2006, 11:56:12 PM
Quote from: "IBE"
While I am not always a K J fan... doesn't she work on the information that the ALE gives her? And if so, how could she work with left-out, or misinformation or no info from ALA?

Then there's probably a big pressure from the Dutch Clan, IMO

ALE actually report to her in a case.  I think it's more likely that KJ left out information when she submitted it to the judges.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #549 11/27 - 11/28/2006
Post by: snoopy on November 27, 2006, 11:56:57 PM
Quote from: "hummingbird7525"
Quote from: "Ono"
Quote from: "hummingbird7525"
:lol: Hi to all of you Monkeys:
You all should be so proud of yourselves. Each and every one of you! I've been reading and reading for 18 months, I've listened to all of you and your thoughts of what might have happened to Natalee. I must say that you all blow me away at how right on the money you have been.  I can't go to those other sites, cuz I get to angry, but I have read some at BFN, I didn't connect there.  You all are truly amazing people.  Red, Tom, Mrs. and KLAAS, YOU REALLY DO ROCK! Hope it doesnt sound selfish on my part, but thanks for giving me a place to go  to EVERYDAY to help myself heal because of my heartbreak for Natalee and her family.  As I watched Beth tonight, with tears streaming down my face, in awe of her strength.


Hi Hummingbird.  :D


Hi Ono,
You all are so happy and up tonight and well you should be.  I can't seem to stop bawling.  Oh well, I've had these kinda nights before. It will pass.


Everything will be ok hummingbird.  We just gotta stay the course.  We're here for Natalee, but we're also here for each other too, buddy.   :wink:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #549 11/27 - 11/28/2006
Post by: crazybabyborg on November 27, 2006, 11:57:32 PM
I keep looking for encouraging things around this case, and even though I hope that something sticks to JK2 soon, I do believe that there are enough people with enough knowledge outside of Slootville, that the truth will eventually surface. Someone said that at least Joran is fast becoming the "Aruban OJ" and I agree with that. I also think that this cage has set the standard for truth in the blatant absence of formal justice. You all have done an amazing job, and Klaas, the record is here for anyone who wishes to view it. Thank you!


Title: Lively Case Discussion #549 11/27 - 11/28/2006
Post by: cubbeegirl on November 27, 2006, 11:59:15 PM
Quote from: "snoopy"
Quote from: "hummingbird7525"
Quote from: "Ono"
Quote from: "hummingbird7525"
:lol: Hi to all of you Monkeys:
You all should be so proud of yourselves. Each and every one of you! I've been reading and reading for 18 months, I've listened to all of you and your thoughts of what might have happened to Natalee. I must say that you all blow me away at how right on the money you have been.  I can't go to those other sites, cuz I get to angry, but I have read some at BFN, I didn't connect there.  You all are truly amazing people.  Red, Tom, Mrs. and KLAAS, YOU REALLY DO ROCK! Hope it doesnt sound selfish on my part, but thanks for giving me a place to go  to EVERYDAY to help myself heal because of my heartbreak for Natalee and her family.  As I watched Beth tonight, with tears streaming down my face, in awe of her strength.


Hi Hummingbird.  :D


Hi Ono,
You all are so happy and up tonight and well you should be.  I can't seem to stop bawling.  Oh well, I've had these kinda nights before. It will pass.


Everything will be ok hummingbird.  We just gotta stay the course.  We're here for Natalee, but we're also here for each other too, buddy.   :wink:



Thats right hummingbird, and now what we have known for a very long time now is going to be known by many,many others. Hopefully this will turn the tide in favor of Justice for Natalee....


Title: Lively Case Discussion #549 11/27 - 11/28/2006
Post by: Lala'sMom on November 27, 2006, 11:59:26 PM
Shango Says: June 27th, 2005 at 10:09 pm
Young Babylonians and Shivas do not build sand castles
DirtyHand knows this
Children of the Elders play in the maze,
but DirtyHand is afraid to rave


Let's put KJ in the mix here...Dirty Hand is most often referred to as a "he".  But this time Shango doesn't say that.  Anyway, the real key here is what all of us monkeys already knew....they were never at the beach.  If Shango knew this on June 27, then how many others did as well and how did they know this?  What is IT that makes them know that Natalee was not on the beach with Joran?  He lost his shoes there...he told Greta he did...Deepak brought two dogs there...Joran said so....even the K2 say they left Joran and Natalee there....so how does Shango know that never happened?


Title: Re: KJ
Post by: snoopy on November 28, 2006, 12:00:05 AM
Quote from: "IBE"
While I am not always a K J fan... doesn't she work on the information that the ALE gives her? And if so, how could she work with left-out, or misinformation or no info from ALA?

Then there's probably a big pressure from the Dutch Clan, IMO


Well sumpin sure the heck is wrong now ain't it?  Dirty cop, dirty judge, dirty prosecutor, dirty hand, Dirtyhand, dirtyhands......heck the're all dirty.  Somebody's gotta step up to the plate and do the right thing.  It's time to man-up.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #549 11/27 - 11/28/2006
Post by: klaasend on November 28, 2006, 12:00:30 AM
Note to JR Dutch Attorney at FOB

In case you weren't aware, when we refer to JR we are talking about Julia Renfro, not you.  Actually, we don't give you a second thought



(http://i37.photobucket.com/albums/e82/klaasend2/JuliaWitch-1.gif)


Title: Lively Case Discussion #549 11/27 - 11/28/2006
Post by: crazybabyborg on November 28, 2006, 12:03:26 AM
I keep running into references of "two dogs" and that is something that must have developed while I was away. This is from a statement by Joran? Why would Deepak bring two dogs to the beach? In his car???!!! From all I've heard about Deepak's attitude twd's his car, I doubt that. Anybody feel like straightening me out?


Title: Lively Case Discussion #549 11/27 - 11/28/2006
Post by: bleachedblack on November 28, 2006, 12:05:09 AM
Quote from: "Lala'sMom"
Shango Says: June 27th, 2005 at 10:09 pm
Young Babylonians and Shivas do not build sand castles
DirtyHand knows this
Children of the Elders play in the maze,
but DirtyHand is afraid to rave


Let's put KJ in the mix here...Dirty Hand is most often referred to as a "he".  But this time Shango doesn't say that.  Anyway, the real key here is what all of us monkeys already knew....they were never at the beach.  If Shango knew this on June 27, then how many others did as well and how did they know this?  What is IT that makes them know that Natalee was not on the beach with Joran?  He lost his shoes there...he told Greta he did...Deepak brought two dogs there...Joran said so....even the K2 say they left Joran and Natalee there....so how does Shango know that never happened?


Lala's do you remember when dutchlady used to post here? I remember this one post of hers that was like a psych. profile of JVDS in which she was certain that Natalee was taken to the beach?


Title: Lively Case Discussion #549 11/27 - 11/28/2006
Post by: snoopy on November 28, 2006, 12:05:33 AM
Quote from: "Lala'sMom"
Shango Says: June 27th, 2005 at 10:09 pm
Young Babylonians and Shivas do not build sand castles
DirtyHand knows this
Children of the Elders play in the maze,
but DirtyHand is afraid to rave


Let's put KJ in the mix here...Dirty Hand is most often referred to as a "he".  But this time Shango doesn't say that.  Anyway, the real key here is what all of us monkeys already knew....they were never at the beach.  If Shango knew this on June 27, then how many others did as well and how did they know this?  What is IT that makes them know that Natalee was not on the beach with Joran?  He lost his shoes there...he told Greta he did...Deepak brought two dogs there...Joran said so....even the K2 say they left Joran and Natalee there....so how does Shango know that never happened?


Inside knowledge would be my guess.  Or Shango knew the previous pattern of Joran.  I think many people knew the pimps routine with girls, and turned a blind eye.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #549 11/27 - 11/28/2006
Post by: memphis on November 28, 2006, 12:07:00 AM
but...but...Lalas??

Shango Says: June 27th, 2005 at 8:06 pm
Babalu opened a window looking into Babylon on his 12:31 A.M. post

Babalú Says: June 27th, 2005 at 12:30 am
Concerned: No, I guess he is head of some local official corps. He is the guy that knows everything and that has been in the house of Babylonians NOT seeking pleasure for himself, so Shango says. So maybe he went to search for Natalee and he is the chief of Polis.


 :?:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #549 11/27 - 11/28/2006
Post by: hummingbird7525 on November 28, 2006, 12:08:01 AM
Thanks for the kind words I am feeling better.  I'm gonna go to bed thinking that Mr Peter just got everyones attention, got them interested. Now with more investagating, his next show will dig and little deeper.  Hopefully he'll turn loose of some higher up names and get this really moving. night all. :wink:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #549 11/27 - 11/28/2006
Post by: snoopy on November 28, 2006, 12:09:16 AM
Quote from: "hummingbird7525"
Thanks for the kind words I am feeling better.  I'm gonna go to bed thinking that Mr Peter just got everyones attention, got them interested. Now with more investagating, his next show will dig and little deeper.  Hopefully he'll turn loose of some higher up names and get this really moving. night all. :wink:


Good Night hummingbird.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #549 11/27 - 11/28/2006
Post by: Lala'sMom on November 28, 2006, 12:10:28 AM
Quote from: "memphis"
but...but...Lalas??

Shango Says: June 27th, 2005 at 8:06 pm
Babalu opened a window looking into Babylon on his 12:31 A.M. post

Babalú Says: June 27th, 2005 at 12:30 am
Concerned: No, I guess he is head of some local official corps. He is the guy that knows everything and that has been in the house of Babylonians NOT seeking pleasure for himself, so Shango says. So maybe he went to search for Natalee and he is the chief of Polis.


 :?:


The question you have to ask is...which Shango was this?  Shango 1 or Shango 2?


Title: Lively Case Discussion #549 11/27 - 11/28/2006
Post by: crazybabyborg on November 28, 2006, 12:11:02 AM
The last place that JK2 felt a need to place themselves with Natalee and offer an explanation for was Joran's house. They covered the possibility that the car was seen there by that lame story of going by the house, parking, but not going in. I don't think Natalee ever left there with full consciousness and maybe died there. I believe strongly that what happened to her began at that property. Actually the drugging began at C&Cs.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #549 11/27 - 11/28/2006
Post by: bleachedblack on November 28, 2006, 12:13:30 AM
Quote from: "bleachedblack"
Quote from: "Lala'sMom"
Shango Says: June 27th, 2005 at 10:09 pm
Young Babylonians and Shivas do not build sand castles
DirtyHand knows this
Children of the Elders play in the maze,
but DirtyHand is afraid to rave


Let's put KJ in the mix here...Dirty Hand is most often referred to as a "he".  But this time Shango doesn't say that.  Anyway, the real key here is what all of us monkeys already knew....they were never at the beach.  If Shango knew this on June 27, then how many others did as well and how did they know this?  What is IT that makes them know that Natalee was not on the beach with Joran?  He lost his shoes there...he told Greta he did...Deepak brought two dogs there...Joran said so....even the K2 say they left Joran and Natalee there....so how does Shango know that never happened?


Lala's do you remember when dutchlady used to post here? I remember this one post of hers that was like a psych. profile of JVDS in which she was certain that Natalee was taken to the beach?


Sorry I meant to write Natalee was NOT taken to the beach.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #549 11/27 - 11/28/2006
Post by: memphis on November 28, 2006, 12:14:37 AM
Quote from: "bleachedblack"
Quote from: "Lala'sMom"
Shango Says: June 27th, 2005 at 10:09 pm
Young Babylonians and Shivas do not build sand castles
DirtyHand knows this
Children of the Elders play in the maze,
but DirtyHand is afraid to rave


Let's put KJ in the mix here...Dirty Hand is most often referred to as a "he".  But this time Shango doesn't say that.  Anyway, the real key here is what all of us monkeys already knew....they were never at the beach.  If Shango knew this on June 27, then how many others did as well and how did they know this?  What is IT that makes them know that Natalee was not on the beach with Joran?  He lost his shoes there...he told Greta he did...Deepak brought two dogs there...Joran said so....even the K2 say they left Joran and Natalee there....so how does Shango know that never happened?


Lala's do you remember when dutchlady used to post here? I remember this one post of hers that was like a psych. profile of JVDS in which she was certain that Natalee was taken to the beach?


Didn't hammer post that earlier today? I think I read it.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #549 11/27 - 11/28/2006
Post by: bleachedblack on November 28, 2006, 12:17:02 AM
Memphis wrote;
Quote
Didn't hammer post that earlier today? I think I read it.

Did he? afraid I didn't see it.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #549 11/27 - 11/28/2006
Post by: snoopy on November 28, 2006, 12:17:06 AM
Well I gotta go to bed ya'll.  Been good to be with ya for a while.

Dutchlady was fascinating.  Very very bright.  Had to read her stuff multiple times to get it.

Shango1 and Shango2?  We'll have to catch up, Lala's.

Good night.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #549 11/27 - 11/28/2006
Post by: Lala'sMom on November 28, 2006, 12:17:09 AM
Quote from: "memphis"
but...but...Lalas??

Shango Says: June 27th, 2005 at 8:06 pm
Babalu opened a window looking into Babylon on his 12:31 A.M. post

Babalú Says: June 27th, 2005 at 12:30 am
Concerned: No, I guess he is head of some local official corps. He is the guy that knows everything and that has been in the house of Babylonians NOT seeking pleasure for himself, so Shango says. So maybe he went to search for Natalee and he is the chief of Polis.


 :?:


So where does Shango say that dirty hand is the police chief...I mean just come out and say that?  He doesn't, we just assume that to be that case...remember there are others that think it is Rudy Croes and even some that think it is somebody else.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #549 11/27 - 11/28/2006
Post by: memphis on November 28, 2006, 12:17:33 AM
Quote from: "Lala'sMom"
Quote from: "memphis"
but...but...Lalas??

Shango Says: June 27th, 2005 at 8:06 pm
Babalu opened a window looking into Babylon on his 12:31 A.M. post

Babalú Says: June 27th, 2005 at 12:30 am
Concerned: No, I guess he is head of some local official corps. He is the guy that knows everything and that has been in the house of Babylonians NOT seeking pleasure for himself, so Shango says. So maybe he went to search for Natalee and he is the chief of Polis.


 :?:


The question you have to ask is...which Shango was this?  Shango 1 or Shango 2?


ahhh...ding ding diing  :idea:

Ok, I say Shango 2 (I have a specific one in mind) because he's the one I've wanted to discuss with you.   :lol:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #549 11/27 - 11/28/2006
Post by: Angiex911dsptchr on November 28, 2006, 12:18:58 AM
Quote from: "snoopy"
Well I gotta go to bed ya'll.  Been good to be with ya for a while.

Dutchlady was fascinating.  Very very bright.  Had to read her stuff multiple times to get it.

Shango1 and Shango2?  We'll have to catch up, Lala's.

Good night.


  Have a great night Snoop Dawg!!  :)


Title: Lively Case Discussion #549 11/27 - 11/28/2006
Post by: memphis on November 28, 2006, 12:19:00 AM
Quote from: "bleachedblack"
Memphis wrote;
Quote
Didn't hammer post that earlier today? I think I read it.

Did he? afraid I didn't see it.


Let me look for it and see if it is the same one you're talking about. It was the first time I had read DutchLady and it WAS NOT an easy read.  :lol:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #549 11/27 - 11/28/2006
Post by: Tylergal on November 28, 2006, 12:19:24 AM
Quote from: "GabbyG"
Quote from: "LilPuma"
Quote from: "Sue"
Quote from: "dkpen"
You know with this picture of Joran and Natalee is disturbing to me. I can't get it out of my head. ugh!

Taking or making of souviners from or of the victim(s) is evidence of fantasy at work.  Joran has major issues.

GET THE BOY HELP NOW ANITA! Please, before another girl falls victim to your ill-begotten son.



she cant help her boy... she cant help herself


I've often wondered about Anita:  
A.  Is she covering for Joran and Paulus, knowing full well what they do, what kind of men they really are?  

B.  Does she "know" but not really know, and is in denial?  

C.  Is she truly clueless, believing her men are innocent of all charges?


Evening Monkeys   :D  Hey Lil Puma...I started to go with B, but as I was typing out my response I realized that I actually think she may be aware, I dont see how she couldn't be after all this time. I am sure she has shed many tears while talking to joran and also to paulus, asking questions, watching their faces, listening to the tone of their voices as they answered. Also I dont see how joran or paulus could keep her from hearing things they said to each other now and then, even if they tried to. She would hear some things, thus she would almost have to know the truth even if she wont allow it to settle in her heart. I have to go with A, I think she does know, but perhaps wants to be in denial because she loves them.


Hear things?  She knows everything.  If Natalee was still alive when she returned from the NL, she might have been the one to dispose of her.  Speaking of ice queens, Greta does not hold a candle to Anita.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #549 11/27 - 11/28/2006
Post by: klaasend on November 28, 2006, 12:19:52 AM
Shower time, brb


Title: Lively Case Discussion #549 11/27 - 11/28/2006
Post by: cubbeegirl on November 28, 2006, 12:20:49 AM
Quote from: "memphis"
Quote from: "bleachedblack"
Memphis wrote;
Quote
Didn't hammer post that earlier today? I think I read it.

Did he? afraid I didn't see it.


Let me look for it and see if it is the same one you're talking about. It was the first time I had read DutchLady and it WAS NOT an easy read.  :lol:



Her posts never were an easy read, I always had to read them a couple of times, I liked reading her posts, just had to read them a couple of times to get the whole thing....


Title: Lively Case Discussion #549 11/27 - 11/28/2006
Post by: bleachedblack on November 28, 2006, 12:21:40 AM
This is the highlight of the one I am talking about. She posted it on 8/3 '05.

+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++

If a person who takes someone has a home he takes that person to be isolated for his intentions. In all the cases of abductions of persons at nightclubs and at open places there is a foreplay of games as bait.
It also makes sense as sex is not an off- on switch with two in tow, it is a game set out before hand with more than one.
It is also the case that the beach was a later alibi as was the lighthouse one, as distancing from the home of Joran who had unlimited access. No kids shits on the beach if he has a bog at home. To graphic, then listen to kids of that age in school. No man or boy of over 16 would think of peeing in a gutter or laying in a tourism place as an alternative to his own drink parlour and bog. Yes, the words come as easily as other predators I have listened too, and what they do is tell a good story in their mind and regurtitate it. It takes a snake to catch a snake. The snake is not Joran, yes he has in my opinion lashed out at Natalee for some reason, but the duality of this is the repetition and stage management so that has to be a more older adult. He is procuring for someone else and simple bragging because he joins in on the action as a forensic cue from his own photos on the web.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #549 11/27 - 11/28/2006
Post by: cubbeegirl on November 28, 2006, 12:24:06 AM
Quote from: "crazybabyborg"
The last place that JK2 felt a need to place themselves with Natalee and offer an explanation for was Joran's house. They covered the possibility that the car was seen there by that lame story of going by the house, parking, but not going in. I don't think Natalee ever left there with full consciousness and maybe died there. I believe strongly that what happened to her began at that property. Actually the drugging began at C&Cs.


I agree CBB. That whole, going to the house, but not going in story never did sound one bit believable to me....And I also feel that the "something bad" happened at that house....


Title: Lively Case Discussion #549 11/27 - 11/28/2006
Post by: Lala'sMom on November 28, 2006, 12:24:18 AM
Well, the beach story is tied into the K2 saying that they left Joran and Natalee there and also because Joran places himself there.  The only thing is that in one of the statements a reference is made about driving by Joran's place.  It is obvious that his place is involved, because why?   They want everyone to think they were on the beach.  Something bad happened...in the car or in his apartment.  She died on these jerks and giving no regard to Natalee at all...they just left her to die or maybe aided in her demise.   There is always some inking of truth in everything they say...if the beach was involved at all it was because Deepak had to pee again.  Maybe she jumped out of the car and ran and that is how they connect the beach in all this... it's convoluted at best.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #549 11/27 - 11/28/2006
Post by: justinsmama on November 28, 2006, 12:25:45 AM
Monkeys~ For the first time in well over a year, I have real hope that Beth, Dave and all of Nat's loved ones may have closure. This warms my heart and lifts my spirit. How good it must feel for Nat's people! After all the the battles that have been lost, and while the "war" is not yet over, we finally have won a significant battle. I am so proud to be a small part of this wonderful community that we have here. We have stood by the family in the search for the truth, and provided some comfort to them (and each other).  God bless each and every one of us who have championed for our beautiful Naltalee.

Oh, and...

JORAN.SCARED!


Title: Lively Case Discussion #549 11/27 - 11/28/2006
Post by: bleachedblack on November 28, 2006, 12:25:47 AM
Quote from: "cubbeegirl"
Quote from: "memphis"
Quote from: "bleachedblack"
Memphis wrote;
Quote
Didn't hammer post that earlier today? I think I read it.

Did he? afraid I didn't see it.


Let me look for it and see if it is the same one you're talking about. It was the first time I had read DutchLady and it WAS NOT an easy read.  :lol:



Her posts never were an easy read, I always had to read them a couple of times, I liked reading her posts, just had to read them a couple of times to get the whole thing....


I totally agree, loved all her posts. Still like to look back and compare some posts now ring more true than at the time they were written.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #549 11/27 - 11/28/2006
Post by: memphis on November 28, 2006, 12:26:12 AM
Lalas, isn't Shango telling Babalu that he got it?

I need to study more for this quiz!   :lol:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #549 11/27 - 11/28/2006
Post by: cubbeegirl on November 28, 2006, 12:28:36 AM
Quote from: "bleachedblack"
Quote from: "cubbeegirl"
Quote from: "memphis"
Quote from: "bleachedblack"
Memphis wrote;
Quote
Didn't hammer post that earlier today? I think I read it.

Did he? afraid I didn't see it.


Let me look for it and see if it is the same one you're talking about. It was the first time I had read DutchLady and it WAS NOT an easy read.  :lol:



Her posts never were an easy read, I always had to read them a couple of times, I liked reading her posts, just had to read them a couple of times to get the whole thing....


I totally agree, loved all her posts. Still like to look back and compare some posts now ring more true than at the time they were written.


Agreed... If memory serves me some were not so kind towards DutchLady's posts....


Title: Re: King
Post by: Tylergal on November 28, 2006, 12:30:17 AM
Quote from: "IBE"
And it was King who changed his name after the Mathews case?

Where human rights were proofed to be violated and I think, evidence was changed or lost. I believe that Paulus van der Sloot also worked on that case with King.

Also, wasn't it King withwhom the Sloots stayed while Joran was in prison? using the excuse of staying away from the media at their home and the cementing of the pool area?

Correct me if I am wrong. Thanks

IBE


Yes, the Sloots stayed at Ben King's while Joran was in prison and there was suspicion that Joran was coming home at nights with Ben King and spending nights there instead of in Kia.  Also, Paulus is the one who helped Ben (Voc)King during the episode that involved Matthews, for which the United Nations (not that I love that organization) and Amnesty International as well as other organizations were scrutinizing Ben Voc(King) and possibly PVDS for their illegal and inhumane actions.  

One of the posters at RWV lived on the same street as Ben VocKing and verified that the Sloots were staying there.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #549 11/27 - 11/28/2006
Post by: Angiex911dsptchr on November 28, 2006, 12:30:25 AM
Greta repeat on in 20 minutes if anoyne misssed it on FOX
the interview with Peter Devries.. and Beth!!


Title: Lively Case Discussion #549 11/27 - 11/28/2006
Post by: nonesuche on November 28, 2006, 12:32:43 AM
bleachedandblack- Thanks for remembering DLady for she did give us some early insights that were undervalued by some, I wish we still had her with us.

Tyler - thank you for your note on the ice queen Anita, I'm right there with you, she's simply willing to stop at nothing to protect her male turf.

Lala's and Memphis - you two make me smile tonight  :D tango twins  :lol:

(http://i86.photobucket.com/albums/k101/daisysistah/GIFS/smilies/word/matchboxsmile.gif) keep the light burning bright folks, after a sleepless night last night I have to get some zzzz's


Title: Lively Case Discussion #549 11/27 - 11/28/2006
Post by: memphis on November 28, 2006, 12:33:51 AM
Quote from: "bleachedblack"
This is the highlight of the one I am talking about. She posted it on 8/3 '05.

+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++

If a person who takes someone has a home he takes that person to be isolated for his intentions. In all the cases of abductions of persons at nightclubs and at open places there is a foreplay of games as bait.
It also makes sense as sex is not an off- on switch with two in tow, it is a game set out before hand with more than one.
It is also the case that the beach was a later alibi as was the lighthouse one, as distancing from the home of Joran who had unlimited access. No kids shits on the beach if he has a bog at home. To graphic, then listen to kids of that age in school. No man or boy of over 16 would think of peeing in a gutter or laying in a tourism place as an alternative to his own drink parlour and bog. Yes, the words come as easily as other predators I have listened too, and what they do is tell a good story in their mind and regurtitate it. It takes a snake to catch a snake. The snake is not Joran, yes he has in my opinion lashed out at Natalee for some reason, but the duality of this is the repetition and stage management so that has to be a more older adult. He is procuring for someone else and simple bragging because he joins in on the action as a forensic cue from his own photos on the web.


This is not the same one that Hammer posted.
Very interesting. Is she saying that Joran procured Natalee for someone else?


Title: Lively Case Discussion #549 11/27 - 11/28/2006
Post by: bleachedblack on November 28, 2006, 12:34:40 AM
cubbeegirl wrote;
Quote

Agreed... If memory serves me some were not so kind towards DutchLady's posts....


I know I am not sure why. She did maybe make a few posts that were alittle far out, but i thought she was great, but more than that , I felt she had a unique insight into the human psyche.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #549 11/27 - 11/28/2006
Post by: mishy on November 28, 2006, 12:35:51 AM
Good evening monkeys! Just a late night drive by before I pour myself into bed...Is Greta interviewing P DeVries? Do I need to tape her show? I had taken her off my tivo...

Hope all is well with everyone!! :lol:  :lol:  :lol:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #549 11/27 - 11/28/2006
Post by: cubbeegirl on November 28, 2006, 12:36:24 AM
Quote from: "bleachedblack"
cubbeegirl wrote;
Quote

Agreed... If memory serves me some were not so kind towards DutchLady's posts....


I know I am not sure why. She did maybe make a few posts that were alittle far out, but i thought she was great, but more than that , I felt she had a unique insight into the human psyche.



Me too...


Title: Lively Case Discussion #549 11/27 - 11/28/2006
Post by: Carnut on November 28, 2006, 12:36:25 AM
Gotta say one thing for Greta, she did bring on DeVries and Beth right after the Dutch show and pretty much asked alot of the right questions.

Obviously her heart wasn't in it, but she did do the show, it was the right thing to do.

And now there's a lot of Dutch folks beginning to see the light.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #549 11/27 - 11/28/2006
Post by: Anna on November 28, 2006, 12:37:28 AM
Quote from: "klaasend"
Quote from: "carpe noctem"
hi there...

Does Posner own the MARRIOTT at Palm Beach?

Does anyone know?

No, Posner does not own the Marriott or any hotel.  He owns the Excelsior Casino in the Holiday Inn.



Klaas,
Am behind reading to catch up but doesn't Posner own the fairly new Bickell Bay Resort?  I thought that he built that and owned it.  Apparently it is not as nice as some of the other resorts as is only two star.

.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #549 11/27 - 11/28/2006
Post by: Lala'sMom on November 28, 2006, 12:37:51 AM
Quote from: "memphis"
Lalas, isn't Shango telling Babalu that he got it?

I need to study more for this quiz!   :lol:


Well, sort of, but with Shango you can't always believe what you read.  He may have been saying that was one of the dirty hands. Shango says there are many.  If van der Straaten was the one and only, then Shango was indeed wrong...we know that already and it has yet to bring down the corruption...so my guess is that we don't have dirty hand yet.  If Dirty Hand knows all and sees all and if tells all everything begins to tumble...we have long suspected and said that van der Straaten was Dirty Hand.  Has it changed anything?  Not yet, maybe we don't know who it is yet.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #549 11/27 - 11/28/2006
Post by: crazybabyborg on November 28, 2006, 12:38:34 AM
Quote from: "Angiex911dsptchr"
Greta repeat on in 20 minutes if anoyne misssed it on FOX
the interview with Peter Devries.. and Beth!!


I did, and thx!  :D


Title: Lively Case Discussion #549 11/27 - 11/28/2006
Post by: bleachedblack on November 28, 2006, 12:38:52 AM
Quote from: "memphis"
Quote from: "bleachedblack"
This is the highlight of the one I am talking about. She posted it on 8/3 '05.

+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++

If a person who takes someone has a home he takes that person to be isolated for his intentions. In all the cases of abductions of persons at nightclubs and at open places there is a foreplay of games as bait.
It also makes sense as sex is not an off- on switch with two in tow, it is a game set out before hand with more than one.
It is also the case that the beach was a later alibi as was the lighthouse one, as distancing from the home of Joran who had unlimited access. No kids shits on the beach if he has a bog at home. To graphic, then listen to kids of that age in school. No man or boy of over 16 would think of peeing in a gutter or laying in a tourism place as an alternative to his own drink parlour and bog. Yes, the words come as easily as other predators I have listened too, and what they do is tell a good story in their mind and regurtitate it. It takes a snake to catch a snake. The snake is not Joran, yes he has in my opinion lashed out at Natalee for some reason, but the duality of this is the repetition and stage management so that has to be a more older adult. He is procuring for someone else and simple bragging because he joins in on the action as a forensic cue from his own photos on the web.


This is not the same one that Hammer posted.
Very interesting. Is she saying that Joran procured Natalee for someone else?


Yes in that post, along with the fact that any boy/man over the age of 16(?)
that has a place of his own (Joran 's apartment) to take a girl, so that they can be alone --in this case for jorans devious persuits-would certainly go there, not to a beach or other public place where they could possibly be discovered......only she worded like this--" No man or boy of over 16 would think of peeing in a gutter or laying in a tourism place as an alternative to his own drink parlour and bog. "


Title: Lively Case Discussion #549 11/27 - 11/28/2006
Post by: klaasend on November 28, 2006, 12:39:18 AM
Quote from: "Anna"
Quote from: "klaasend"
Quote from: "carpe noctem"
hi there...

Does Posner own the MARRIOTT at Palm Beach?

Does anyone know?

No, Posner does not own the Marriott or any hotel.  He owns the Excelsior Casino in the Holiday Inn.



Klaas,
Am behind reading to catch up but doesn't Posner own the fairly new Bickell Bay Resort?  I thought that he built that and owned it.  Apparently it is not as nice as some of the other resorts as is only two star.

.


oops, I forgot about Brickell Bay..yes, I think he does.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #549 11/27 - 11/28/2006
Post by: Tylergal on November 28, 2006, 12:39:32 AM
Quote from: "Lala'sMom"
Quote from: "snoopy"
Quote from: "memphis"
Quote from: "snoopy"
I noticed that nothing was said about Jan Van der Straaten in all this.  I wonder where he plays into all of this madness?


 :shock: Could Shango have been wrong?  :shock:   :lol:


Say it ain't so!! :lol:  :lol:


If you remember Shango never said it was van der Straaten.


I never read that either, but I did read the part where he indicated that "Drax scored..." and I thought that was in reference to JVDStraaten, but I have always, always, always, always have felt that Rudy Croes is Dirty Hand, but Shango mentioned dirty hand and Dirtyhand, if I make no mistake.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #549 11/27 - 11/28/2006
Post by: memphis on November 28, 2006, 12:40:21 AM
Quote from: "bleachedblack"
cubbeegirl wrote;
Quote

Agreed... If memory serves me some were not so kind towards DutchLady's posts....


I know I am not sure why. She did maybe make a few posts that were alittle far out, but i thought she was great, but more than that , I felt she had a unique insight into the human psyche.


bb, did you save all of her posts? Does anyone know DL's background? Psychology?

Nite None! Sleep well.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #549 11/27 - 11/28/2006
Post by: justinsmama on November 28, 2006, 12:41:52 AM
Of course something bad went down at the Sloot compound, and not in Joran's quarters. Why else keep the search out of the main house?


Title: Lively Case Discussion #549 11/27 - 11/28/2006
Post by: Lala'sMom on November 28, 2006, 12:42:42 AM
Quote from: "Carnut"
Gotta say one thing for Greta, she did bring on DeVries and Beth right after the Dutch show and pretty much asked alot of the right questions.

Obviously her heart wasn't in it, but she did do the show, it was the right thing to do.

And now there's a lot of Dutch folks beginning to see the light.


Yes, and I also think that is about all we will hear from Greta about this.  She is not going to take this on again unless she can win this time.  As far as I can see she is still aligned with the wrong people.  Certainly not enthusiastic at all tonight. Beth was very distant to her also...good for her.  Fool me once...but not again.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #549 11/27 - 11/28/2006
Post by: bleachedblack on November 28, 2006, 12:43:54 AM
Quote from: "memphis"
Quote from: "bleachedblack"
cubbeegirl wrote;
Quote

Agreed... If memory serves me some were not so kind towards DutchLady's posts....


I know I am not sure why. She did maybe make a few posts that were alittle far out, but i thought she was great, but more than that , I felt she had a unique insight into the human psyche.


bb, did you save all of her posts? Does anyone know DL's background? Psychology?

Nite None! Sleep well.


No I did not save them all. One time she did post a really interesting resume, I'll see if I can find it.....


Title: Lively Case Discussion #549 11/27 - 11/28/2006
Post by: Angiex911dsptchr on November 28, 2006, 12:44:41 AM
Quote from: "mishy"
Good evening monkeys! Just a late night drive by before I pour myself into bed...Is Greta interviewing P DeVries? Do I need to tape her show? I had taken her off my tivo...

Hope all is well with everyone!! :lol:  :lol:  :lol:


 Hey Mishy~!!! It wil be on again in approx 7 minutes on FOX.
 If you miss it.. SAN  and Jackie  transrribed it somewhere on this thread. Its at the VERY beginning of Gretas show. :)  
  Greta seemed.. coldhearted  IMO.. but Devries was good and Beth was awesome!!!!!!!!


Title: Lively Case Discussion #549 11/27 - 11/28/2006
Post by: Angiex911dsptchr on November 28, 2006, 12:45:41 AM
Quote from: "crazybabyborg"
Quote from: "Angiex911dsptchr"
Greta repeat on in 20 minutes if anoyne misssed it on FOX
the interview with Peter Devries.. and Beth!!


I did, and thx!  :D


  HI CBB~!!  Great to see you!!  :)


Title: Lively Case Discussion #549 11/27 - 11/28/2006
Post by: cubbeegirl on November 28, 2006, 12:45:48 AM
Quote from: "Angiex911dsptchr"
Quote from: "mishy"
Good evening monkeys! Just a late night drive by before I pour myself into bed...Is Greta interviewing P DeVries? Do I need to tape her show? I had taken her off my tivo...

Hope all is well with everyone!! :lol:  :lol:  :lol:


 Hey Mishy~!!! It wil be on again in approx 7 minutes on FOX.
 If you miss it.. SAN  and Jackie  transrribed it somewhere on this thread. Its at the VERY beginning of Gretas show. :)  
  Greta seemed.. coldhearted  IMO.. but Devries was good and Beth was awesome!!!!!!!!



I think Greta needs to get some emails regarding her demeanor tonight...


Title: Lively Case Discussion #549 11/27 - 11/28/2006
Post by: Angiex911dsptchr on November 28, 2006, 12:46:40 AM
Quote from: "justinsmama"
Of course something bad went down at the Sloot compound, and not in Joran's quarters. Why else keep the search out of the main house?

 

 I agree 10000000% Justins! and IMO poppa Sloot was there too..


Title: Lively Case Discussion #549 11/27 - 11/28/2006
Post by: Lala'sMom on November 28, 2006, 12:47:38 AM
Shango Says:June 26th, 2005 at 10:48 pm
Coverups begin with elders and the founders of the houses of Babylon
Not the minions
DirtyHand knows this


Even Shango knew there was corruption before many of us realized the extent.  If you notice, Simian never says that the ALE is involved in a cover up...ever. No bad words for the police from Simian, but Shango seems to delight in telling this tale.  Two very different points of view, yet they almost came to the same conclusion...makes you go HHMMMMM!
 

Hugs to Nemo. :wink:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #549 11/27 - 11/28/2006
Post by: cubbeegirl on November 28, 2006, 12:47:52 AM
Quote from: "Angiex911dsptchr"
Quote from: "justinsmama"
Of course something bad went down at the Sloot compound, and not in Joran's quarters. Why else keep the search out of the main house?

 

 I agree 10000000% Justins! and IMO poppa Sloot was there too..



Yep.... that pig! :twisted:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #549 11/27 - 11/28/2006
Post by: Angiex911dsptchr on November 28, 2006, 12:48:14 AM
Quote from: "cubbeegirl"
Quote from: "Angiex911dsptchr"
Quote from: "mishy"
Good evening monkeys! Just a late night drive by before I pour myself into bed...Is Greta interviewing P DeVries? Do I need to tape her show? I had taken her off my tivo...

Hope all is well with everyone!! :lol:  :lol:  :lol:


 Hey Mishy~!!! It wil be on again in approx 7 minutes on FOX.
 If you miss it.. SAN  and Jackie  transrribed it somewhere on this thread. Its at the VERY beginning of Gretas show. :)  
  Greta seemed.. coldhearted  IMO.. but Devries was good and Beth was awesome!!!!!!!!



I think Greta needs to get some emails regarding her demeanor tonight...


 God Love Beth for being as strong as she is..  some of Grtas remarks she made Im afraid I would have told her to go straight to hell.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #549 11/27 - 11/28/2006
Post by: Tylergal on November 28, 2006, 12:49:06 AM
Quote from: "cubbeegirl"
Quote from: "crazybabyborg"
The last place that JK2 felt a need to place themselves with Natalee and offer an explanation for was Joran's house. They covered the possibility that the car was seen there by that lame story of going by the house, parking, but not going in. I don't think Natalee ever left there with full consciousness and maybe died there. I believe strongly that what happened to her began at that property. Actually the drugging began at C&Cs.


I agree CBB. That whole, going to the house, but not going in story never did sound one bit believable to me....And I also feel that the "something bad" happened at that house....


He had to admit that they went to his house, because the car was seen.  Remember?  He was never going to admit it, but he had to insert it in there in some way, and that was how he handled the part of the lie he was caught in.  "We went by but did not go in."

If you recall, Arubagirl had mentioned it on the word-wide-web that they were seen going to Montanja, headed toward Joran house.  Who says that perhaps a neighbor did not see Deepaks' car there?  But what I suspect is Deepak dropped them off and went back to clean his car.  Something bad happened to Natalee at the hands of Paulus vanderSloot under the procurement of Joran and Deepak was summoned for some reason.  Satish knew about it and thus asked how the girl was.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #549 11/27 - 11/28/2006
Post by: Lala'sMom on November 28, 2006, 12:49:20 AM
Memphis
Email me your thoughts on Shango...


Title: Lively Case Discussion #549 11/27 - 11/28/2006
Post by: Tylergal on November 28, 2006, 12:49:58 AM
Quote from: "Lala'sMom"
Well, the beach story is tied into the K2 saying that they left Joran and Natalee there and also because Joran places himself there.  The only thing is that in one of the statements a reference is made about driving by Joran's place.  It is obvious that his place is involved, because why?   They want everyone to think they were on the beach.  Something bad happened...in the car or in his apartment.  She died on these jerks and giving no regard to Natalee at all...they just left her to die or maybe aided in her demise.   There is always some inking of truth in everything they say...if the beach was involved at all it was because Deepak had to pee again.  Maybe she jumped out of the car and ran and that is how they connect the beach in all this... it's convoluted at best.


They buried her temporarily near the fishermen's huts :shock:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #549 11/27 - 11/28/2006
Post by: Angiex911dsptchr on November 28, 2006, 12:50:26 AM
Greta repeat on  right NOW!


Title: Lively Case Discussion #549 11/27 - 11/28/2006
Post by: cubbeegirl on November 28, 2006, 12:50:45 AM
Quote from: "Tylergal"
Quote from: "cubbeegirl"
Quote from: "crazybabyborg"
The last place that JK2 felt a need to place themselves with Natalee and offer an explanation for was Joran's house. They covered the possibility that the car was seen there by that lame story of going by the house, parking, but not going in. I don't think Natalee ever left there with full consciousness and maybe died there. I believe strongly that what happened to her began at that property. Actually the drugging began at C&Cs.


I agree CBB. That whole, going to the house, but not going in story never did sound one bit believable to me....And I also feel that the "something bad" happened at that house....


He had to admit that they went to his house, because the car was seen.  Remember?  He was never going to admit it, but he had to insert it in there in some way, and that was how he handled the part of the lie he was caught in.  "We went by but did not go in."

If you recall, Arubagirl had mentioned it on the word-wide-web that they were seen going to Montanja, headed toward Joran house.  Who says that perhaps a neighbor did not see Deepaks' car there?  But what I suspect is Deepak dropped them off and went back to clean his car.  Something bad happened to Natalee at the hands of Paulus vanderSloot under the procurement of Joran and Deepak was summoned for some reason.  Satish knew about it and thus asked how the girl was.



Sounds about right Tyler...
Going to go watch Greta again in my warm bed...
Night monkeys...


Title: Lively Case Discussion #549 11/27 - 11/28/2006
Post by: Angiex911dsptchr on November 28, 2006, 12:51:55 AM
Night Cubbee,,


Title: Lively Case Discussion #549 11/27 - 11/28/2006
Post by: Tylergal on November 28, 2006, 12:52:13 AM
Quote from: "cubbeegirl"
Quote from: "bleachedblack"
Quote from: "cubbeegirl"
Quote from: "memphis"
Quote from: "bleachedblack"
Memphis wrote;
Quote
Didn't hammer post that earlier today? I think I read it.

Did he? afraid I didn't see it.


Let me look for it and see if it is the same one you're talking about. It was the first time I had read DutchLady and it WAS NOT an easy read.  :lol:



Her posts never were an easy read, I always had to read them a couple of times, I liked reading her posts, just had to read them a couple of times to get the whole thing....


I totally agree, loved all her posts. Still like to look back and compare some posts now ring more true than at the time they were written.


Agreed... If memory serves me some were not so kind towards DutchLady's posts....


I thought everyone was pretty nice to Dutch Lady.  She never posted much on the Lively.  She posted in other areas.  She was a difficult read, at best but interesting to say the least and always insightful.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #549 11/27 - 11/28/2006
Post by: memphis on November 28, 2006, 12:54:24 AM
Quote from: "Lala'sMom"
Shango Says:June 26th, 2005 at 10:48 pm
Coverups begin with elders and the founders of the houses of Babylon
Not the minions
DirtyHand knows this


Even Shango knew there was corruption before many of us realized the extent.  If you notice, Simian never says that the ALE is involved in a cover up...ever. No bad words for the police from Simian, but Shango seems to delight in telling this tale.  Two very different points of view, yet they almost came to the same conclusion...makes you go HHMMMMM!
 

Hugs to Nemo. :wink:


Would you say that Shango holds the Dutch on the island responsible?


Title: Lively Case Discussion #549 11/27 - 11/28/2006
Post by: crazybabyborg on November 28, 2006, 12:54:50 AM
Joran ADMITS he was at his parent's home with Natalee???


Title: Lively Case Discussion #549 11/27 - 11/28/2006
Post by: Lala'sMom on November 28, 2006, 12:55:49 AM
Shango certainly doesn't have nice things to say about them.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #549 11/27 - 11/28/2006
Post by: crazybabyborg on November 28, 2006, 12:56:20 AM
Did the Justice Dept. "DeWitt" have the authority to narrow the search on the Sloot property?


Title: Lively Case Discussion #549 11/27 - 11/28/2006
Post by: crazybabyborg on November 28, 2006, 12:57:35 AM
Well at best, KJ is an idiot.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #549 11/27 - 11/28/2006
Post by: Angiex911dsptchr on November 28, 2006, 12:58:21 AM
Quote from: "crazybabyborg"
Well at best, KJ is an idiot.



 AMEN to that CBB,,


Title: Lively Case Discussion #549 11/27 - 11/28/2006
Post by: memphis on November 28, 2006, 01:00:19 AM
Quote from: "Lala'sMom"
Memphis
Email me your thoughts on Shango...


Oh, ok. I just saw this post.

Just let me say here ...

Shango Says: June 27th, 2005 at 9:48 pm
Babalu knew who dirty hand was at half past 12

Shango repeats this over and over. To me he is s
Saying that when Babalu said it was the chief of polis he had it right.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #549 11/27 - 11/28/2006
Post by: justinsmama on November 28, 2006, 01:02:40 AM
Quote from: "Angiex911dsptchr"
Quote from: "justinsmama"
Of course something bad went down at the Sloot compound, and not in Joran's quarters. Why else keep the search out of the main house?

 

 I agree 10000000% Justins! and IMO poppa Sloot was there too..


Yup. Where else would he have been?

I want a ciggie so bad! Not trying to quit, just give my lungs a rest and the chance to get over a hacking cough (asthmatic bronchitis). I've been wearing a patch. But I surely do want the sensation of drawing in smoke.  :oops:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #549 11/27 - 11/28/2006
Post by: Tylergal on November 28, 2006, 01:02:45 AM
good to see so many monkeys here tonight . . . . natalee's most vocal and visible supporters save for beth, who has put up with greta when most would have told her to go to hell.  beth certainly loved natalee to the point of turning the other cheek.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #549 11/27 - 11/28/2006
Post by: bleachedblack on November 28, 2006, 01:03:30 AM
Tylergal wrote;
Quote
I thought everyone was pretty nice to Dutch Lady. She never posted much on the Lively. She posted in other areas. She was a difficult read, at best but interesting to say the least and always insightful.


She really did take alot of bashing at times......sometimes I think she would sound so absolutely positive of what she was "seeing" that people took it wrong and thought of her as a psychic, which I think was not the case. She may have been in part, or at least a person with "special gifts", but I know she is a criminologist and gains insight into who may have perpetrated a particular crime by doing some type of triangulation of the suspects movements around the time a crime was commited.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #549 11/27 - 11/28/2006
Post by: San on November 28, 2006, 01:05:57 AM
PART II

A Little from Greta - 11/27/06

Joining us Live from Alabama is Natalee’s mother Beth Holloway Twitty:

Greta:  Nice to see you Beth.

Beth:  Hi Greta;

Greta:  Beth let’s start first with the thought what Peter De Vries the Dutch Investigative Reporter has to say about Joran’s lawyer what do you think about that.

Beth:  Well I mean the report clearly shows the frustrations that we have been dealing with for the past 18 months Greta and the meeting that Antonio Carlo had with Karin Janssen you know it just gives us that affirmation that we’ve known this all along that there was collusion involved with all of the personnel there.

Greta:  Peter says and I suppose if there is any sort of light at the end of the tunnel is that he doesn’t it’s too late to solve this and to find out what happened to Natalee.  Do you think it’s too late or you still have fire in your belly to find out what happened and believe it can be?

Beth:  Well I think now we have the names and faces of people who were obstructing justice, who were derailing and investigation, who were protecting suspects.  So now it’s time to depose these individuals and they need to get Bob Witt and these are the personal who were working in the Justice Department and they are the ones who have evidently they have information as to what happened or they would not have be outlining and planning the execution of the derailment of the investigation.

Greta:  And you named names that apparently if one could see the entire or even understand Dutch the entire Dutch television show raised some names and asked some questions about difficulties you were having in the prosecutions office.

Greta:  Karin Janssen the prosecutor!!!  Have you heard from her?  Has she asked you for any information?  Has she given you any sign whatsoever that she’s working this case.

Beth:  No zero Greta.  Absolutely zero.  Nothing!!!

Greta:  Do you hear anything at all from anyone in Aruba?

Beth:  No not anything and you know were just so fortunate we were able to make that move in Amsterdam and for Peter De Vries to pick up on Scaredmonkeys.com and delve into the statements because otherwise we would not even now finally find out the persons who were involved like I said in derailing the investigation.

Greta:  Peter said when I talked to him he said that the police think that Natalee never made it to the beach that night.  What do you think about that?  I mean that had been sort of the working police theory that she had been down at the beach with them.

Beth:  Well you know there were four different versions of how Joran told the police of how he got home from the beach that night so I think we were really suspicious of that early on.  I think that was one of the red flags that Mr. De Vries picked up on is you don’t have four different versions of how you had gotten home from the beach that night.

Greta:  So where do you go from here I mean what do you do?  Beth you’ve spent an awful lot of time down there, you know there has not been any information whatsoever not even a little information there has been no information what are you going to do?

Beth:  I think the first person that they need to start with are these personnel that work in Aruban justice department that are responsible for the derailing of the investigation.  There is where they need to go to; you know I mean it is clear they have knowledge of why they were doing this so I think that would be a great start.

Greta:  You know the viewers have been through this investigation with you up and down for the last 18 months.  I haven’t seen you lately but I know many of them are immensely curious of how you and Jug and how Dave and Robin are doing.  How are you getting through this period?  Going back into the holidays and still no answers.

Beth:  Well still no answers but you know Greta we’ve really been able to pull a lot of positive things out this and we have some things going on with the Safe Travels Foundation and you know we just hope that we are just trying to turn our tragedy into something that’s positive for others persons and really that’s where we spend most of our time now and also when things permit or come about just as this involvement for the Netherlands we will just readily accept that and just try and work with anyone that we can.

Greta:  Do you really think I mean I know you expect I know you would like but maybe I’m more optimistic than some of the rest of us but do you think that this latest television show in Holland is in any way going to inspire anyone to reach deeper and investigate harder and get you information.

Beth: You know I don’t know but I know one thing it sure does give vindication to know that all along we felt we have been fighting this undercurrent from certain personnel in Aruba and we didn’t have names we didn’t have faces but now we do and we know it’s real and we know that Joran Van der Sloot is still the primary suspect.  And I know that’s not getting answers and not getting Natalee’s perpetrators behind bars where he should be but you know it sure feels good after 18 months to know the persons that were fighting us all along the way.

Greta:  You know I thought it was immensely cruel the fact that they don’t give you any information that even the prosecutor can’t think of some way to stay in touch with you I thought that they could do something.  I thought that’s the cruel nature of this on top of losing a child.

Beth:  You know exactly Greta it is very cruel to not be forthright with the family and to share with us the personnel that were working right within the Justice Department that were hampering our efforts all along the way every step we took they were six ahead of us covering.  So it’s just she could have had the decency to tell us.  You know every step we made was just futile.

Greta:  Beth thank you and perhaps this latest television show will inspire somebody to do something for you and your family.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #549 11/27 - 11/28/2006
Post by: Angiex911dsptchr on November 28, 2006, 01:06:01 AM
Quote from: "justinsmama"
Quote from: "Angiex911dsptchr"
Quote from: "justinsmama"
Of course something bad went down at the Sloot compound, and not in Joran's quarters. Why else keep the search out of the main house?

 

 I agree 10000000% Justins! and IMO poppa Sloot was there too..


Yup. Where else would he have been?

I want a ciggie so bad! Not trying to quit, just give my lungs a rest and the chance to get over a hacking cough (asthmatic bronchitis). I've been wearing a patch. But I surely do want the sensation of drawing in smoke.  :oops:


  OH  Justins.. you poor gal.   I used to get that twice a year.
 Bronchtis messed my voice up :(
Do you have Albuterol Inhaler? Antibitoics?  Hope you went to the dr!!!!!!!!!!!!   I know its hell to want a ciggy..  I will smoke one for yah k?
 I was so damn sick. I didnt smoke for a few months.. should have quit for good. :(


Title: Lively Case Discussion #549 11/27 - 11/28/2006
Post by: memphis on November 28, 2006, 01:06:10 AM
Do you all ever wonder what happened to posters such as DutchLady?

I mean, there were people who were very involved. You would think that they would peek in every once in a while, wouldn't ya?


Another person I've been pondering is Bailey of Bailey and Alyse. Why has she not ever piped up? You know she is aware of who she was with last summer. She could certainly shine some light on some of the events of that night. She removed some of the pictures that we have seen. She also edited her Aruba pics in the middle of November, but none of the others were edited.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #549 11/27 - 11/28/2006
Post by: justinsmama on November 28, 2006, 01:07:33 AM
Quote from: "Tylergal"
good to see so many monkeys here tonight . . . . natalee's most vocal and visible supporters save for beth, who has put up with greta when most would have told her to go to hell.  beth certainly loved natalee to the point of turning the other cheek.


Yes, she and Dave both. I have no doubt that Nat was the remarkable person that they both describe. With parents such as they, it is no wonder.

Past my bedtime and already overslept this (Monday) morning. Better be off. The boss won't like 2 consecutive days of my snoozing.   :wink:

I love you monkeys!


Title: Lively Case Discussion #549 11/27 - 11/28/2006
Post by: cubbeegirl on November 28, 2006, 01:07:47 AM
Quote from: "bleachedblack"
Tylergal wrote;
Quote
I thought everyone was pretty nice to Dutch Lady. She never posted much on the Lively. She posted in other areas. She was a difficult read, at best but interesting to say the least and always insightful.


She really did take alot of bashing at times......sometimes I think she would sound so absolutely positive of what she was "seeing" that people took it wrong and thought of her as a psychic, which I think was not the case. She may have been in part, or at least a person with "special gifts", but I know she is a criminologist and gains insight into who may have perpetrated a particular crime by doing some type of triangulation of the suspects movements around the time a crime was commited.



Yes, she did tak a lot of bashing at times. And I think you hit the nail on the head as to why. I wish she were still here....

Night again....


Title: Lively Case Discussion #549 11/27 - 11/28/2006
Post by: crazybabyborg on November 28, 2006, 01:07:56 AM
How stupid is KJ to WRITE a formal letter to Joran's atty! Half of all cases  are solved by winking and nodding to cut to the chase. J's atty went to KJ during a time that looked like there was no way Joran could get out of it, but by the time she followed up in WRITING, it looked less sure of that. So, she CHOOSES to expose his actions. How lame! He "helps" her privately and tells her she'll have to gather the evidence for what he is telling her, and she can't figure out that she needs to maintain that confidence and USE it to further her case when it stalls! Oh no, she documents the effort! I'd love to have KJ on the opposing side......


Title: Lively Case Discussion #549 11/27 - 11/28/2006
Post by: Angiex911dsptchr on November 28, 2006, 01:08:03 AM
Quote from: "Tylergal"
good to see so many monkeys here tonight . . . . natalee's most vocal and visible supporters save for beth, who has put up with greta when most would have told her to go to hell.  beth certainly loved natalee to the point of turning the other cheek.


  Hey Tyler~!!  I agree!!


Title: Lively Case Discussion #549 11/27 - 11/28/2006
Post by: justinsmama on November 28, 2006, 01:10:48 AM
Angie~ Yes, have the inhaler. No antibiotic, as the original catalyst for the bronchitis was a viral infection (very nasty clod). At least I have the sense to lay off smoking for a bit. I'd like to be able to quit, but I dunno how realistic that is at this time (heart's not in it). Thanx for the ciggie, chicky!


Title: Lively Case Discussion #549 11/27 - 11/28/2006
Post by: A's Fever on November 28, 2006, 01:11:21 AM
Quote from: "justinsmama"
Quote from: "Angiex911dsptchr"
Quote from: "justinsmama"
Of course something bad went down at the Sloot compound, and not in Joran's quarters. Why else keep the search out of the main house?

 

 I agree 10000000% Justins! and IMO poppa Sloot was there too..


Yup. Where else would he have been?

I want a ciggie so bad! Not trying to quit, just give my lungs a rest and the chance to get over a hacking cough (asthmatic bronchitis). I've been wearing a patch. But I surely do want the sensation of drawing in smoke.  :oops:


Hang in there!  Try substituting a new habit: cup of hot herbal tea; warm bath, etc.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #549 11/27 - 11/28/2006
Post by: bleachedblack on November 28, 2006, 01:11:53 AM
Night cubbeegirl .


Title: Lively Case Discussion #549 11/27 - 11/28/2006
Post by: cubbeegirl on November 28, 2006, 01:13:38 AM
Quote from: "justinsmama"
Angie~ Yes, have the inhaler. No antibiotic, as the original catalyst for the bronchitis was a viral infection (very nasty clod). At least I have the sense to lay off smoking for a bit. I'd like to be able to quit, but I dunno how realistic that is at this time (heart's not in it). Thanx for the ciggie, chicky!



One more thing before I turn off the lights, Justins, I am smoking my last ciggy of the day for you, so now you shall have two.... :wink:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #549 11/27 - 11/28/2006
Post by: Angiex911dsptchr on November 28, 2006, 01:13:48 AM
Quote from: "justinsmama"
Angie~ Yes, have the inhaler. No antibiotic, as the original catalyst for the bronchitis was a viral infection (very nasty clod). At least I have the sense to lay off smoking for a bit. I'd like to be able to quit, but I dunno how realistic that is at this time (heart's not in it). Thanx for the ciggie, chicky!


  I carry an inhaler in my purse all the time :)  Glad you arnt smokin.. I know how you feel hon.. I wanted to so bad when I was sick.. and tryed to.. and.. I hacked so bad I heaved. That did it for me.. couldnt inhale anyhow, couldnt breath. and I truly do hate huggin the toilet!


Title: Lively Case Discussion #549 11/27 - 11/28/2006
Post by: bleachedblack on November 28, 2006, 01:14:51 AM
Memphis wrote;
Quote
Do you all ever wonder what happened to posters such as DutchLady?

I mean, there were people who were very involved. You would think that they would peek in every once in a while, wouldn't ya?


Maybe they do peek in? I too wish she would come back and post.....


Title: Lively Case Discussion #549 11/27 - 11/28/2006
Post by: Angiex911dsptchr on November 28, 2006, 01:16:25 AM
Quote from: "bleachedblack"
Night cubbeegirl .


  BB  Love your Gilda Monkey  ROFL~!!
 She was my absolute FAV on SNL!! Good ol days with her and Bill Murry. jane Curtain etc..  :)


Title: Lively Case Discussion #549 11/27 - 11/28/2006
Post by: crazybabyborg on November 28, 2006, 01:19:46 AM
I've got to get my bed cleared off of work junk and take a shower. Have a good night!


Title: Lively Case Discussion #549 11/27 - 11/28/2006
Post by: bleachedblack on November 28, 2006, 01:19:49 AM
Quote from: "Angiex911dsptchr"
Quote from: "bleachedblack"
Night cubbeegirl .


  BB  Love your Gilda Monkey  ROFL~!!
 She was my absolute FAV on SNL!! Good ol days with her and Bill Murry. jane Curtain etc..  :)


Thank-you........ :oops:  

 :lol:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Mj4hhHVY3co


Title: Lively Case Discussion #549 11/27 - 11/28/2006
Post by: Carnut on November 28, 2006, 01:20:31 AM
Quote from: "crazybabyborg"
How stupid is KJ to WRITE a formal letter to Joran's atty! Half of all cases  are solved by winking and nodding to cut to the chase. J's atty went to KJ during a time that looked like there was no way Joran could get out of it, but by the time she followed up in WRITING, it looked less sure of that. So, she CHOOSES to expose his actions. How lame! He "helps" her privately and tells her she'll have to gather the evidence for what he is telling her, and she can't figure out that she needs to maintain that confidence and USE it to further her case when it stalls! Oh no, she documents the effort! I'd love to have KJ on the opposing side......


Kinda shows KJ was part of the coverup and wanted to let Carlo know he better shut the f--k up.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #549 11/27 - 11/28/2006
Post by: Carnut on November 28, 2006, 01:21:24 AM
Quote from: "A's Fever"
Quote from: "justinsmama"
Quote from: "Angiex911dsptchr"
Quote from: "justinsmama"
Of course something bad went down at the Sloot compound, and not in Joran's quarters. Why else keep the search out of the main house?

 

 I agree 10000000% Justins! and IMO poppa Sloot was there too..


Yup. Where else would he have been?

I want a ciggie so bad! Not trying to quit, just give my lungs a rest and the chance to get over a hacking cough (asthmatic bronchitis). I've been wearing a patch. But I surely do want the sensation of drawing in smoke.  :oops:
sex?

Hang in there!  Try substituting a new habit: cup of hot herbal tea; warm bath, etc.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #549 11/27 - 11/28/2006
Post by: Angiex911dsptchr on November 28, 2006, 01:21:37 AM
Quote from: "bleachedblack"
Quote from: "Angiex911dsptchr"
Quote from: "bleachedblack"
Night cubbeegirl .


  BB  Love your Gilda Monkey  ROFL~!!
 She was my absolute FAV on SNL!! Good ol days with her and Bill Murry. jane Curtain etc..  :)


Thank-you........ :oops:  

 :lol:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Mj4hhHVY3co


  ROFL~!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
 OMG  .. I used to laugh so hard at her. and when she used to do the hating the hair on a peice of soap!!!  She was fantastic!!  :)


Title: Lively Case Discussion #549 11/27 - 11/28/2006
Post by: Carnut on November 28, 2006, 01:21:55 AM
Quote from: "A's Fever"
Quote from: "justinsmama"
Quote from: "Angiex911dsptchr"
Quote from: "justinsmama"
Of course something bad went down at the Sloot compound, and not in Joran's quarters. Why else keep the search out of the main house?

 

 I agree 10000000% Justins! and IMO poppa Sloot was there too..


Yup. Where else would he have been?

I want a ciggie so bad! Not trying to quit, just give my lungs a rest and the chance to get over a hacking cough (asthmatic bronchitis). I've been wearing a patch. But I surely do want the sensation of drawing in smoke.  :oops:


Hang in there!  Try substituting a new habit: cup of hot herbal tea; warm bath, etc.
sex?

Ooops again.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #549 11/27 - 11/28/2006
Post by: Angiex911dsptchr on November 28, 2006, 01:22:15 AM
Carnut  LMAO!


Title: Lively Case Discussion #549 11/27 - 11/28/2006
Post by: Angiex911dsptchr on November 28, 2006, 01:24:12 AM
Well my turn for the pillow!!   Didnt realize how late it is.. and has to get up for work tomorrow. Great to see you all~!!!!!!!!!

 HUGGING NEMO FOR LALAS!!  HUGS TO CP.. :) :)


Title: Lively Case Discussion #549 11/27 - 11/28/2006
Post by: bleachedblack on November 28, 2006, 01:25:03 AM
Quote from: "Angiex911dsptchr"
Quote from: "bleachedblack"
Quote from: "Angiex911dsptchr"
Quote from: "bleachedblack"
Night cubbeegirl .


  BB  Love your Gilda Monkey  ROFL~!!
 She was my absolute FAV on SNL!! Good ol days with her and Bill Murry. jane Curtain etc..  :)


Thank-you........ :oops:  

 :lol:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Mj4hhHVY3co


  ROFL~!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
 OMG  .. I used to laugh so hard at her. and when she used to do the hating the hair on a peice of soap!!!  She was fantastic!!  :)


She was a hoot! I hate that the person that recorded that clip for youtube cut off the punch line though.....bad.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #549 11/27 - 11/28/2006
Post by: Angiex911dsptchr on November 28, 2006, 01:25:39 AM
Quote from: "bleachedblack"
Quote from: "Angiex911dsptchr"
Quote from: "bleachedblack"
Quote from: "Angiex911dsptchr"
Quote from: "bleachedblack"
Night cubbeegirl .


  BB  Love your Gilda Monkey  ROFL~!!
 She was my absolute FAV on SNL!! Good ol days with her and Bill Murry. jane Curtain etc..  :)


Thank-you........ :oops:  

 :lol:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Mj4hhHVY3co


  ROFL~!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
 OMG  .. I used to laugh so hard at her. and when she used to do the hating the hair on a peice of soap!!!  She was fantastic!!  :)


She was a hoot! I hate that the person that recorded that clip for youtube cut off the punch line though.....bad.

  Its always somthin.  :wink:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #549 11/27 - 11/28/2006
Post by: bleachedblack on November 28, 2006, 01:26:09 AM
Quote from: "Angiex911dsptchr"
Well my turn for the pillow!!   Didnt realize how late it is.. and has to get up for work tomorrow. Great to see you all~!!!!!!!!!

 HUGGING NEMO FOR LALAS!!  HUGS TO CP.. :) :)


Night Angie, I'm out for the night too......


Title: Lively Case Discussion #549 11/27 - 11/28/2006
Post by: A's Fever on November 28, 2006, 01:38:09 AM
Quote from: "Carnut"
Quote from: "A's Fever"
Quote from: "justinsmama"
Quote from: "Angiex911dsptchr"
Quote from: "justinsmama"
Of course something bad went down at the Sloot compound, and not in Joran's quarters. Why else keep the search out of the main house?

 

 I agree 10000000% Justins! and IMO poppa Sloot was there too..


Yup. Where else would he have been?

I want a ciggie so bad! Not trying to quit, just give my lungs a rest and the chance to get over a hacking cough (asthmatic bronchitis). I've been wearing a patch. But I surely do want the sensation of drawing in smoke.  :oops:


Hang in there!  Try substituting a new habit: cup of hot herbal tea; warm bath, etc.
sex?

Ooops again.


Where is that dang edit button when you need it?  :?


Title: Lively Case Discussion #549 11/27 - 11/28/2006
Post by: Anna on November 28, 2006, 01:38:25 AM
Beth: I think the first person that they need to start with are these personnel that work in Aruban justice department that are responsible for the derailing of the investigation. There is where they need to go to; you know I mean it is clear they have knowledge of why they were doing this so I think that would be a great start.


Yes, they have to have some idea of what happened in order to know what to block.  In the case of Bob Witt, it was the search of the Sloot property.  If he didn't know what happened, why would he bother to block this?

Not very smart.   :roll: And why have Ben Vocking open the door if they had nothing to hide?  I am sure he watched every move and kept ALE away from any forensic evidence that could have been present.

This last one is one of the most blatant conflicts of interest ever!  A member of the prosecution team on hand to protect the suspects in a search??

We may not understand their system but we do know a load of BS when we see it and this has to be one of the biggest loads ever shoveled.

.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #549 11/27 - 11/28/2006
Post by: crazybabyborg on November 28, 2006, 01:50:08 AM
Quote from: "Carnut"
Quote from: "crazybabyborg"
How stupid is KJ to WRITE a formal letter to Joran's atty! Half of all cases  are solved by winking and nodding to cut to the chase. J's atty went to KJ during a time that looked like there was no way Joran could get out of it, but by the time she followed up in WRITING, it looked less sure of that. So, she CHOOSES to expose his actions. How lame! He "helps" her privately and tells her she'll have to gather the evidence for what he is telling her, and she can't figure out that she needs to maintain that confidence and USE it to further her case when it stalls! Oh no, she documents the effort! I'd love to have KJ on the opposing side......


Kinda shows KJ was part of the coverup and wanted to let Carlo know he better shut the f--k up.


You got that right! Well said.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #549 11/27 - 11/28/2006
Post by: Anna on November 28, 2006, 01:50:26 AM
Quote from: "Carnut"
Quote from: "crazybabyborg"
How stupid is KJ to WRITE a formal letter to Joran's atty! Half of all cases  are solved by winking and nodding to cut to the chase. J's atty went to KJ during a time that looked like there was no way Joran could get out of it, but by the time she followed up in WRITING, it looked less sure of that. So, she CHOOSES to expose his actions. How lame! He "helps" her privately and tells her she'll have to gather the evidence for what he is telling her, and she can't figure out that she needs to maintain that confidence and USE it to further her case when it stalls! Oh no, she documents the effort! I'd love to have KJ on the opposing side......


Kinda shows KJ was part of the coverup and wanted to let Carlo know he better shut the f--k up.




Nothing like burning your source to shut him up, is there?  How very strange this relationship is with Paulus working for this man's firm and his admitting to KJ that Joran is the most guilty of parties involved.  Add to that then KJ blabs that he said this.

Would like to be the proverbial fly on the wall around that office with paulus knowing this man said Joran was largely responsible.   :roll:


Over time I have come to the conclusion that not only is KJ working to prevent presecution, she is not very bright about it.  Remember this is the woman who wrote to our Dept of Justice and asked if Beth was related to Hitler.  Is Aruba where the Dutch send not only the fugly people but the dingbats as well???

Think about that!

.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #549 11/27 - 11/28/2006
Post by: crazybabyborg on November 28, 2006, 01:53:18 AM
Quote from: "Anna"
Beth: I think the first person that they need to start with are these personnel that work in Aruban justice department that are responsible for the derailing of the investigation. There is where they need to go to; you know I mean it is clear they have knowledge of why they were doing this so I think that would be a great start.


Yes, they have to have some idea of what happened in order to know what to block.  In the case of Bob Witt, it was the search of the Sloot property.  If he didn't know what happened, why would he bother to block this?

Not very smart.   :roll: And why have Ben Vocking open the door if they had nothing to hide?  I am sure he watched every move and kept ALE away from any forensic evidence that could have been present.

This last one is one of the most blatant conflicts of interest ever!  A member of the prosecution team on hand to protect the suspects in a search??

We may not understand their system but we do know a load of BS when we see it and this has to be one of the biggest loads ever shoveled.

.


I'm trying to figure out if he had the authority to narrow the search. I realize that with or without it, he did dictate that the search was restricted, but was he supposed to have that authority? Anybody?


Title: Lively Case Discussion #549 11/27 - 11/28/2006
Post by: crazybabyborg on November 28, 2006, 01:55:05 AM
Quote from: "Anna"
Quote from: "Carnut"
Quote from: "crazybabyborg"
How stupid is KJ to WRITE a formal letter to Joran's atty! Half of all cases  are solved by winking and nodding to cut to the chase. J's atty went to KJ during a time that looked like there was no way Joran could get out of it, but by the time she followed up in WRITING, it looked less sure of that. So, she CHOOSES to expose his actions. How lame! He "helps" her privately and tells her she'll have to gather the evidence for what he is telling her, and she can't figure out that she needs to maintain that confidence and USE it to further her case when it stalls! Oh no, she documents the effort! I'd love to have KJ on the opposing side......


Kinda shows KJ was part of the coverup and wanted to let Carlo know he better shut the f--k up.




Nothing like burning your source to shut him up, is there?  How very strange this relationship is with Paulus working for this man's firm and his admitting to KJ that Joran is the most guilty of parties involved.  Add to that then KJ blabs that he said this.

Would like to be the proverbial fly on the wall around that office with paulus knowing this man said Joran was largely responsible.   :roll:


Over time I have come to the conclusion that not only is KJ working to prevent presecution, she is not very bright about it.  Remember this is the woman who wrote to our Dept of Justice and asked if Beth was related to Hitler.  Is Aruba where the Dutch send not only the fugly people but the dingbats as well???

Think about that!

.


Yeah, I'm convinced it's not a dye job.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #549 11/27 - 11/28/2006
Post by: Carnut on November 28, 2006, 01:55:24 AM
Quote from: "Anna"
Quote from: "Carnut"

Kinda shows KJ was part of the coverup and wanted to let Carlo know he better shut the f--k up.


Nothing like burning your source to shut him up, is there?  How very strange this relationship is with Paulus working for this man's firm and his admitting to KJ that Joran is the most guilty of parties involved.  Add to that then KJ blabs that he said this.

Would like to be the proverbial fly on the wall around that office with paulus knowing this man said Joran was largely responsible.   :roll:


Over time I have come to the conclusion that not only is KJ working to prevent presecution, she is not very bright about it.  Remember this is the woman who wrote to our Dept of Justice and asked if Beth was related to Hitler.  Is Aruba where the Dutch send not only the fugly people but the dingbats as well???

Think about that!

.


Think I've said this before, I'm pretty sure that Antonio was ordered to hire PVDS so PVDS could keep Antonio undercontrol.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #549 11/27 - 11/28/2006
Post by: Anna on November 28, 2006, 01:56:54 AM
CBB,
He was the judge on that ruling so I guess he did have that capacity.  I don't know how their system works.  If the judge can only OK or deny a search but not modify it in this manner, he would be overstepping.

And to refuse a search outright would be too obvious.  So that is a point of law that we should check.

But allowing a search of only Joran's room is just totally lame.  And wew timed it in real time and it only lasted between three and four hours.  Not even a very good search of Joran's apartment.

.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #549 11/27 - 11/28/2006
Post by: Carnut on November 28, 2006, 01:57:09 AM
Quote from: "crazybabyborg"
Quote from: "Anna"
Beth: I think the first person that they need to start with are these personnel that work in Aruban justice department that are responsible for the derailing of the investigation. There is where they need to go to; you know I mean it is clear they have knowledge of why they were doing this so I think that would be a great start.


Yes, they have to have some idea of what happened in order to know what to block.  In the case of Bob Witt, it was the search of the Sloot property.  If he didn't know what happened, why would he bother to block this?

Not very smart.   :roll: And why have Ben Vocking open the door if they had nothing to hide?  I am sure he watched every move and kept ALE away from any forensic evidence that could have been present.

This last one is one of the most blatant conflicts of interest ever!  A member of the prosecution team on hand to protect the suspects in a search??

We may not understand their system but we do know a load of BS when we see it and this has to be one of the biggest loads ever shoveled.

.


I'm trying to figure out if he had the authority to narrow the search. I realize that with or without it, he did dictate that the search was restricted, but was he supposed to have that authority? Anybody?


Think DeVries is showing that the Dutch on the island can do pretty much what they want on the island since the Dutch own the Justice System, they were all covering for their own.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #549 11/27 - 11/28/2006
Post by: Carnut on November 28, 2006, 01:59:17 AM
No matter how much folks want to say it, aruban born ain't full Dutch.

A passport does not a full Dutch make.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #549 11/27 - 11/28/2006
Post by: Anna on November 28, 2006, 02:00:49 AM
Quote from: "crazybabyborg"
[
Yeah, I'm convinced it's not a dye job.


 :D  :D  :D

And I have heard she loves to play some card game, her big passion in life.   :roll: We have heard some of the most incredibly stupid things said by public officials in Aruba as any place on earth!

Case in point, KJ telling Greta to move so she wouldn't hurt her with her car.  Telling Jug if he didn't shut up, she would stop investigating at all.

They don't seem to mind going on the record looking very foolish.

.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #549 11/27 - 11/28/2006
Post by: crazybabyborg on November 28, 2006, 02:02:29 AM
Thx for the response Anna and Carnut. I have assumed that they showed up with permission/warrent to search the entire property, and wondered if it had been obtained with notice and contribution by both prosecutor and defense representation. And if that were the case, I questioned how it could legally be altered without due process.

I know that process could have been ignored, but I think it would be worth knowing.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #549 11/27 - 11/28/2006
Post by: Anna on November 28, 2006, 02:03:12 AM
Quote from: "Carnut"
[.


Think I've said this before, I'm pretty sure that Antonio was ordered to hire PVDS so PVDS could keep Antonio undercontrol.[/quote]


His contacting the prosecution and saying his client was largely responsible has to be some sort of ethics breach.  I would guess this is how they coerced him into hiring Paulus.  But if he hired Paulus, it was not supposed to be told that he was colluding with prosecution?

If deVries does nothing else, he has the rats involved turning on each other in a most unpleasant way!  Good for him!

.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #549 11/27 - 11/28/2006
Post by: crazybabyborg on November 28, 2006, 02:05:32 AM
Speaking of Jug, Anna, has anyone heard anything from or about him? I know it's Beth's personal business and I won't dwell on it, but I hope he and Beth are leaning on each other through this.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #549 11/27 - 11/28/2006
Post by: Anna on November 28, 2006, 02:06:07 AM
CBB,
I don't know it for a fact but have always thought the search warrant altered when before the judge and not on the actual scene of the search.  They knew when they went there, they could only search Joran's little room but were further surprised when Ben Vocking opened the door even to that.

Guess it would sort of take the spirit out of a search.  And they went to all that trouble to put on those silly little bunny suits to impress us!

.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #549 11/27 - 11/28/2006
Post by: Carnut on November 28, 2006, 02:07:48 AM
Quote from: "Anna"
CBB,
I don't know it for a fact but have always thought the search warrant altered when before the judge and not on the actual scene of the search.  They knew when they went there, they could only search Joran's little room but were further surprised when Ben Vocking opened the door even to that.

Guess it would sort of take the spirit out of a search.  And they went to all that trouble to put on those silly little bunny suits to impress us!

.


Heh, heh, yep.

And yes DeVries appears to be what we've all been wishing for for a long time now.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #549 11/27 - 11/28/2006
Post by: Anna on November 28, 2006, 02:08:46 AM
Haven't heard anything from Jug in a long time.  I have always thought he made such a big target he got tired of the bashing and removed himself.  But as far as I know, they are still a couple with their marriage intact much to the disappointment of some who had hopes for it being otherwise.

I always liked Jug and his enthusiasm.

.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #549 11/27 - 11/28/2006
Post by: crazybabyborg on November 28, 2006, 02:11:10 AM
Quote from: "Anna"
CBB,
I don't know it for a fact but have always thought the search warrant altered when before the judge and not on the actual scene of the search.  They knew when they went there, they could only search Joran's little room but were further surprised when Ben Vocking opened the door even to that.

Guess it would sort of take the spirit out of a search.  And they went to all that trouble to put on those silly little bunny suits to impress us!

.


This is San's transcript from the show tonight and it gave the impression that the alteration happened on the spot..................

Peter: Well the search in the home address of the family Van der Sloot is very strange because the search warrant was made by Head Prosecutor Karin Janssen and contained an allowance to search the whole address Mon 19. But when the police was on the spot another high ranking employee of the Justice Office it was Mr. Bob Witt reduced the search warrant to only the room of Joran and that’s very strange. The police was extremely frustrated about this because they had some clues that something might have happened to Natalee elsewhere in the garden or in the house of the parents because Joran admits that he has been with Natalee and Deepak and Satish at the home of his parents.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #549 11/27 - 11/28/2006
Post by: Anna on November 28, 2006, 02:11:54 AM
Next step, I wish deVries would go to Judge Bob Witt and ask him pointblank what was he thinking limiting the search to one room of the house when even the laundry is in the other part of the house, etc.

That would be a start but did KJ pursue this search warrant.  At one late point Dompig called the search warrant on their wish list.  What was done to make this a reality?

I'd guess nothing.  Then you have to ask why.  And it does start to all fall down like a house of cards.

.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #549 11/27 - 11/28/2006
Post by: Tylergal on November 28, 2006, 02:12:21 AM
Quote from: "Carnut"
Quote from: "crazybabyborg"
How stupid is KJ to WRITE a formal letter to Joran's atty! Half of all cases  are solved by winking and nodding to cut to the chase. J's atty went to KJ during a time that looked like there was no way Joran could get out of it, but by the time she followed up in WRITING, it looked less sure of that. So, she CHOOSES to expose his actions. How lame! He "helps" her privately and tells her she'll have to gather the evidence for what he is telling her, and she can't figure out that she needs to maintain that confidence and USE it to further her case when it stalls! Oh no, she documents the effort! I'd love to have KJ on the opposing side......


Kinda shows KJ was part of the coverup and wanted to let Carlo know he better shut the f--k up.


Yep.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #549 11/27 - 11/28/2006
Post by: Tylergal on November 28, 2006, 02:15:05 AM
Quote from: "Anna"
Beth: I think the first person that they need to start with are these personnel that work in Aruban justice department that are responsible for the derailing of the investigation. There is where they need to go to; you know I mean it is clear they have knowledge of why they were doing this so I think that would be a great start.


Yes, they have to have some idea of what happened in order to know what to block.  In the case of Bob Witt, it was the search of the Sloot property.  If he didn't know what happened, why would he bother to block this?

Not very smart.   :roll: And why have Ben Vocking open the door if they had nothing to hide?  I am sure he watched every move and kept ALE away from any forensic evidence that could have been present.

This last one is one of the most blatant conflicts of interest ever!  A member of the prosecution team on hand to protect the suspects in a search??

We may not understand their system but we do know a load of BS when we see it and this has to be one of the biggest loads ever shoveled.

.


Absolutely, Anna, and that is what it is and what Arleen and all of them were:  a pile of BS.  Liars and liars who cover for their criminal friends, little covert operations and it appears they all had something to hide, or else why would they cover for Paulus?  Because he was and had covered for them.  It's just one wild and criminal island.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #549 11/27 - 11/28/2006
Post by: crazybabyborg on November 28, 2006, 02:15:18 AM
I was "glitched" when DeVries said that Jaran admitted he had been with Nat at his parent's house. I didn't know that, but if true, you can bet that Natalee was taken in that house and he was covering for any forensic evidence that might be found there, IMO.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #549 11/27 - 11/28/2006
Post by: Anna on November 28, 2006, 02:16:29 AM
Quote from: "crazybabyborg"
Quote from: "Anna"
CBB,
I don't know it for a fact but have always thought the search warrant altered when before the judge and not on the actual scene of the search.  They knew when they went there, they could only search Joran's little room but were further surprised when Ben Vocking opened the door even to that.

Guess it would sort of take the spirit out of a search.  And they went to all that trouble to put on those silly little bunny suits to impress us!

.


This is San's transcript from the show tonight and it gave the impression that the alteration happened on the spot..................

Peter: Well the search in the home address of the family Van der Sloot is very strange because the search warrant was made by Head Prosecutor Karin Janssen and contained an allowance to search the whole address Mon 19. But when the police was on the spot another high ranking employee of the Justice Office it was Mr. Bob Witt reduced the search warrant to only the room of Joran and that’s very strange. The police was extremely frustrated about this because they had some clues that something might have happened to Natalee elsewhere in the garden or in the house of the parents because Joran admits that he has been with Natalee and Deepak and Satish at the home of his parents.



That definitely says when the police were on the spot!!!  :shock:  :shock:  :shock:

OK, get this--at the time we heard rumor that he, the judge Bob Witt, was physically staying with the Sloots in their home!  Like a guest I suppose while he worked on the island, etc.  And that because this was his normal accommodation when there, he knew the sleeping arrangements, etc. of the younger Sloots.

It was also said that he speculated that it would be highly improper to search the main house since he was staying there.  

This needs to be sent to deVries as rumor of the time for his investigation as well.  It does make sense and would explain what he the judge was doing at the property to be searched in the first place.

Surely not???  But it does add up.

.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #549 11/27 - 11/28/2006
Post by: crazybabyborg on November 28, 2006, 02:17:36 AM
Quote from: "crazybabyborg"
I was "glitched" when DeVries said that Jaran admitted he had been with Nat at his parent's house. I didn't know that, but if true, you can bet that Natalee was taken in that house and he was covering for any forensic evidence that might be found there, IMO.


Self edit: OR that furniture, beds, etc. were moved into the house from Joran's apt.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #549 11/27 - 11/28/2006
Post by: Sue on November 28, 2006, 02:20:28 AM
Quote from: "Anna"
Quote from: "Carnut"
[.


Think I've said this before, I'm pretty sure that Antonio was ordered to hire PVDS so PVDS could keep Antonio undercontrol.



His contacting the prosecution and saying his client was largely responsible has to be some sort of ethics breach.  I would guess this is how they coerced him into hiring Paulus.  But if he hired Paulus, it was not supposed to be told that he was colluding with prosecution?

If deVries does nothing else, he has the rats involved turning on each other in a most unpleasant way!  Good for him!

.[/quote]


they are such snakes down there Karin will come out in a day or so and say none of that never happen


Title: Lively Case Discussion #549 11/27 - 11/28/2006
Post by: Anna on November 28, 2006, 02:20:34 AM
And I can see how a judge in training would be sucking up to the real judges.  Offering to let them stay at his home would be a way to do that.
This does need to be checked as well as if a judge can just change the search warrant on the spot like that and if Witt was even the one who signed the first one.

 :shock:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #549 11/27 - 11/28/2006
Post by: crazybabyborg on November 28, 2006, 02:20:35 AM
Quote from: "Anna"
Quote from: "crazybabyborg"
Quote from: "Anna"
CBB,
I don't know it for a fact but have always thought the search warrant altered when before the judge and not on the actual scene of the search.  They knew when they went there, they could only search Joran's little room but were further surprised when Ben Vocking opened the door even to that.

Guess it would sort of take the spirit out of a search.  And they went to all that trouble to put on those silly little bunny suits to impress us!

.


This is San's transcript from the show tonight and it gave the impression that the alteration happened on the spot..................

Peter: Well the search in the home address of the family Van der Sloot is very strange because the search warrant was made by Head Prosecutor Karin Janssen and contained an allowance to search the whole address Mon 19. But when the police was on the spot another high ranking employee of the Justice Office it was Mr. Bob Witt reduced the search warrant to only the room of Joran and that’s very strange. The police was extremely frustrated about this because they had some clues that something might have happened to Natalee elsewhere in the garden or in the house of the parents because Joran admits that he has been with Natalee and Deepak and Satish at the home of his parents.



That definitely says when the police were on the spot!!!  :shock:  :shock:  :shock:

OK, get this--at the time we heard rumor that he, the judge Bob Witt, was physically staying with the Sloots in their home!  Like a guest I suppose while he worked on the island, etc.  And that because this was his normal accommodation when there, he knew the sleeping arrangements, etc. of the younger Sloots.

It was also said that he speculated that it would be highly improper to search the main house since he was staying there.  

This needs to be sent to deVries as rumor of the time for his investigation as well.  It does make sense and would explain what he the judge was doing at the property to be searched in the first place.

Surely not???  But it does add up.

.


I totally agree, Anna.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #549 11/27 - 11/28/2006
Post by: Anna on November 28, 2006, 02:23:06 AM
Witt may have even thought if he blocked the search from the main house, it would not become as known that he was staying there.  IF in fact he was.

That was just a rumor and not being there to see with our own eyes, we have no way to know if a true one or not.

.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #549 11/27 - 11/28/2006
Post by: Anna on November 28, 2006, 02:25:56 AM
Quote from: "Sue"
[

they are such snakes down there Karin will come out in a day or so and say none of that never happen


Sue,
I don't doubt that for one minute.  The only difference is this time, she will be contradicting deVries who has a huge following among the Dutch.  Not just Beth or Greta or monkeys but one of their own who is more popular and better known that most of the Dutch who deal in this kind of thing.

They can't wiggle away from deVries the way that they have the family.  I think this is something KJ may not have considered yet but she will before this is over, I do hope and pray.

.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #549 11/27 - 11/28/2006
Post by: crazybabyborg on November 28, 2006, 02:26:32 AM
Quote from: "Anna"
Witt may have even thought if he blocked the search from the main house, it would not become as known that he was staying there.  IF in fact he was.

That was just a rumor and not being there to see with our own eyes, we have no way to know if a true one or not.

.


Now we are wondering the same thing. I have wondered if he wasn't there specifically to block the full search, under a guise of "friend of the family" there to lend support. Although I feel sure he was indeed a friend, I keep remembering Anita's habit of calling "friends" in high places. I'll never forget that Paulus simply refused to be "taken" into custody and was allowed to drive himself!


Title: Lively Case Discussion #549 11/27 - 11/28/2006
Post by: Carnut on November 28, 2006, 02:27:25 AM
Quote from: "Anna"
Witt may have even thought if he blocked the search from the main house, it would not become as known that he was staying there.  IF in fact he was.

That was just a rumor and not being there to see with our own eyes, we have no way to know if a true one or not.

.


Well, there sure were a bunch of aruban posters wailing that the entire sloot dump was searched thoroughly.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #549 11/27 - 11/28/2006
Post by: crazybabyborg on November 28, 2006, 02:28:44 AM
Quote from: "Carnut"
Quote from: "Anna"
Witt may have even thought if he blocked the search from the main house, it would not become as known that he was staying there.  IF in fact he was.

That was just a rumor and not being there to see with our own eyes, we have no way to know if a true one or not.

.


Well, there sure were a bunch of aruban posters wailing that the entire sloot dump was searched thoroughly.


I remember that. It's kinda nice when points of facts are settled, isn't it?


Title: Lively Case Discussion #549 11/27 - 11/28/2006
Post by: Anna on November 28, 2006, 02:31:17 AM
Do we know if Witt signed the original search warrant?  Or was he just on hand to modify it?

On at least one occasion when asked why they didn't search the Sloot property KJ said because Paulus wouldn't let us.  She actually said that.

Ben Vocking is for sure a friend of the family, also present despite being a member of prosecution team.  He took vacation time and openly said he owed Paulus for his support during the Alex Matthews affair.

How can this not be seen as corruption?  Well, I will email the deVries website tomorrow and share the RUMOR about Witt staying with the Sloots and maybe someone can check that out.

Hope so!


Title: Lively Case Discussion #549 11/27 - 11/28/2006
Post by: Sue on November 28, 2006, 02:31:48 AM
so has there been any post from witch renfro
or medlwitch


Title: Lively Case Discussion #549 11/27 - 11/28/2006
Post by: crazybabyborg on November 28, 2006, 02:33:31 AM
Who signed the original warrant is a question I'd like to know too. But even if it was Witt, it was altered without due process of any kind.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #549 11/27 - 11/28/2006
Post by: Anna on November 28, 2006, 02:34:41 AM
Quote from: "Carnut"
Quote from: "Anna"
Witt may have even thought if he blocked the search from the main house, it would not become as known that he was staying there.  IF in fact he was.

That was just a rumor and not being there to see with our own eyes, we have no way to know if a true one or not.

.


Well, there sure were a bunch of aruban posters wailing that the entire sloot dump was searched thoroughly.


And one of the RU posters claims to be in direct contact with Anita who swears the entire compound searched and even the flowers dug up.  What flowers?  They never had flowers before.

And scubajab used to claim Joran's apartment was "tossed" three times.  I don't think so at all.  Besides, only Arubans would toss an apartment when they are supposed to be preserving a crime scene.

.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #549 11/27 - 11/28/2006
Post by: crazybabyborg on November 28, 2006, 02:36:11 AM
I know Beth would be loath to do it, but I cannot believe that she would fail to win a civil suit against named legal authorities who handled this case even if the case were brought in Aruba.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #549 11/27 - 11/28/2006
Post by: Anna on November 28, 2006, 02:36:37 AM
Quote from: "crazybabyborg"
Who signed the original warrant is a question I'd like to know too. But even if it was Witt, it was altered without due process of any kind.


Right,
KJ should have been given the opportunity to respond, ask that the original area be upheld, etc.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #549 11/27 - 11/28/2006
Post by: crazybabyborg on November 28, 2006, 02:38:13 AM
Quote from: "Anna"
Quote from: "crazybabyborg"
Who signed the original warrant is a question I'd like to know too. But even if it was Witt, it was altered without due process of any kind.


Right,
KJ should have been given the opportunity to respond, ask that the original area be upheld, etc.


Exactly. You go girl!  :wink:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #549 11/27 - 11/28/2006
Post by: Anna on November 28, 2006, 02:38:53 AM
Quote from: "Sue"
so has there been any post from witch renfro
or medlwitch


I haven't been there to look but Klaas usually keeps an eye on them.  I thought the article about the American tourist dancing in Amigoe was sort of a preemptive strike of sorts.  And they are saying the shocking thing is not the photoshopped photo but that Natalee was using cocaine and it is in the police files as though that makes it a fact.

I am sure she will come up with something outrageous soon.

 :D


Title: Lively Case Discussion #549 11/27 - 11/28/2006
Post by: Anna on November 28, 2006, 02:40:15 AM
Quote from: "crazybabyborg"
Who signed the original warrant is a question I'd like to know too. But even if it was Witt, it was altered without due process of any kind.


Another little difference in their system--I am not sure if we can even get access to public records like this.  Maybe deVries can.

I am hoping he is already onto this irregularity, too.

.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #549 11/27 - 11/28/2006
Post by: Sue on November 28, 2006, 02:41:47 AM
Quote from: "Anna"
Quote from: "Sue"
so has there been any post from witch renfro
or medlwitch


I haven't been there to look but Klaas usually keeps an eye on them.  I thought the article about the American tourist dancing in Amigoe was sort of a preemptive strike of sorts.  And they are saying the shocking thing is not the photoshopped photo but that Natalee was using cocaine and it is in the police files as though that makes it a fact.

I am sure she will come up with something outrageous soon.

 :D


they are both witches and it kills me the thing they come up with


Title: Lively Case Discussion #549 11/27 - 11/28/2006
Post by: Anna on November 28, 2006, 02:42:30 AM
Quote from: "crazybabyborg"
I know Beth would be loath to do it, but I cannot believe that she would fail to win a civil suit against named legal authorities who handled this case even if the case were brought in Aruba.


How about a Class Action Law Suit on behalf of all the tourists who went to Aruba under the impression their crime rate was very low when in fact the murder rate is higher than in the U.S.?  THey had some expert speaking to travel agents who claimed Aruba has one murder in the last twenty years.  This is why msMarple and I have made the Murder and Crime thread.

False advertising, lies and more lies.

.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #549 11/27 - 11/28/2006
Post by: Anna on November 28, 2006, 02:44:43 AM
Quote from: "crazybabyborg"
I know Beth would be loath to do it, but I cannot believe that she would fail to win a civil suit against named legal authorities who handled this case even if the case were brought in Aruba.


And there is an instance of a $19 million judgment against the government of Aruba for a trial in THIS country, too, and over a race track they promised to build then didn't.

So this government can freeze assets in this country, too.

Isn't that a nice thing to know!

I am feeling hopeful again for the first time in ages!!

/


Title: Lively Case Discussion #549 11/27 - 11/28/2006
Post by: crazybabyborg on November 28, 2006, 02:46:39 AM
Quote from: "Anna"
Quote from: "crazybabyborg"
Who signed the original warrant is a question I'd like to know too. But even if it was Witt, it was altered without due process of any kind.


Another little difference in their system--I am not sure if we can even get access to public records like this.  Maybe deVries can.

I am hoping he is already onto this irregularity, too.

.


I believe that "who signed the original warrant" is something that can be answered within the cage, but not by this monkey. We should be able to determine the "due process" question generically without it being specific to this case. What we already know is that a search warrant was required and that it specifically named the entire area to be searched. We just have to find out by what method that legally could be altered. I do not believe their system would require a legal warrant and then allow it's terms to be arbitrarily abandoned without due procedure.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #549 11/27 - 11/28/2006
Post by: Anna on November 28, 2006, 02:47:11 AM
We had better all head to bed but it is exciting to think that there may at least be exposure of those blocking the investigation as Beth said tonight.  And more than ever, I am thankful for our own justice system for while not perfect, something like this at least would never fly!!

.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #549 11/27 - 11/28/2006
Post by: Kat_Gram on November 28, 2006, 02:49:55 AM
here is a link where there are topics, very basis, but it is good for the dates.
http://crime.about.com/od/current/a/natalee_2.htm


Title: Lively Case Discussion #549 11/27 - 11/28/2006
Post by: crazybabyborg on November 28, 2006, 02:50:09 AM
Good advice again, Anna and I'm going to follow it! Night all!


Title: Lively Case Discussion #549 11/27 - 11/28/2006
Post by: Anna on November 28, 2006, 02:56:36 AM
Quote from: "Kat_Gram"
here is a link where there are topics, very basis, but it is good for the dates.
http://crime.about.com/od/current/a/natalee_2.htm


I clicked on the one about searching the teens home and it says only his apartment as well.

Also about taking two vehicles belonging to the Sloots.  That was an odd move considering Joran claims he can't drive and is too young to have a license.  I wonder if they had a reason to do that or if they were just doing it to look official.

Sometimes I think I think about all this in my sleep for will wake up with a different take on something than I went to bed with.  Guess that is what they mean by sleeping on something.

(http://i15.photobucket.com/albums/a360/AnnaBlueSkies/Greetings/thi51111571_3141.gif)


Title: Poker game
Post by: IBE on November 28, 2006, 03:03:59 AM
Anna and all Good Monkeys,

Keep going on the Good Works!

Remember the rumor that the "elders" were in the Sloot house that night for a poker game? Maybe they were there "when something bad happened" and this is the reason for such a big amount of curruption and coverup?

Just thoughts IMO

IBE


Title: Lively Case Discussion #549 11/27 - 11/28/2006
Post by: IBE on November 28, 2006, 03:06:19 AM
Sorry, the bold face was supposed to be on your names, not the whole thing!  Off to bed. Good night!


Title: PS
Post by: IBE on November 28, 2006, 03:09:49 AM
PS

When looking for Dutchlady's posts, don't forget to check in the "Code Talkers" tread, if anyone has saved it. I hope so; it was a wild ride with Shango's code.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #549 11/27 - 11/28/2006
Post by: crazybabyborg on November 28, 2006, 03:13:42 AM
Just peeking back in for a second to offer any morning monkies a big smooch from Marilyn if they can definitively answer who signed the search warrant that Witt narrowed................ TIA! OK, I'm "peeking back out" now. Night!
(http://i25.photobucket.com/albums/c100/crazybabyborgs/peek5.gif)


Title: Lively Case Discussion #549 11/27 - 11/28/2006
Post by: Leslie on November 28, 2006, 06:46:10 AM
Diario
http://www.diarioaruba.com/
Amigoe
http://www.amigoe.com/english/
BonDia
http://www.cspnv.com/
Solo di Pueblo
http://www.solodipueblo.com/
AweMainta
http://www.awemainta.com/
Aruba Today
http://www.arubatoday.com/
Translator:
http://papiamentu.donamaro.nl


Title: Lively Case Discussion #549 11/27 - 11/28/2006
Post by: San on November 28, 2006, 07:19:19 AM
Quote from: "Carnut"

Think I've said this before, I'm pretty sure that Antonio was ordered to hire PVDS so PVDS could keep Antonio undercontrol.

Bingo Carnut.  In my opinion this is exactly why he was hired.  This is why Paulus was forced to be sworn in as a Lawyer.  I think a lot of us found it strange why he would hire Paulus and now we have our questioned answered.  Karin Janssen informed Paulus of what Antonio Carlo did and told Paulus to watch his back.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #549 11/27 - 11/28/2006
Post by: justinsmama on November 28, 2006, 07:39:13 AM
Quote from: "San"
Quote from: "Carnut"

Think I've said this before, I'm pretty sure that Antonio was ordered to hire PVDS so PVDS could keep Antonio undercontrol.

Bingo Carnut.  In my opinion this is exactly why he was hired.  This is why Paulus was forced to be sworn in as a Lawyer.  I think a lot of us found it strange why he would hire Paulus and now we have our questioned answered.  Karin Janssen informed Paulus of what Antonio Carlo did and told Paulus to watch his back.

OMG. It goes deep with this scum.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #549 11/27 - 11/28/2006
Post by: bleachedblack on November 28, 2006, 08:05:09 AM
Quote from: "crazybabyborg"
Just peeking back in for a second to offer any morning monkies a big smooch from Marilyn if they can definitively answer who signed the search warrant that Witt narrowed................ TIA! OK, I'm "peeking back out" now. Night!
(http://i25.photobucket.com/albums/c100/crazybabyborgs/peek5.gif)


Morning CBB and all Monks........stopping by to say hi, and see if any new news has been posted.......although last nights greta interview with Mr. DeVries was the most encouragement felt  in some time....... :)


Title: Lively Case Discussion #549 11/27 - 11/28/2006
Post by: bleachedblack on November 28, 2006, 08:15:34 AM
Browsing the net, found this post from Dan July 3, 2005..........a reminder to me of just how much was known to have happened at the time, but was brushed under the rug to put it mildly.

+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++

I was and still am a bit leary of this report on corruption in the Dutch justice system in Aruba: some facts appear to be incorrect. For instance, Paul(us) v d Sloot is not a "high-ranking official."

    The habitual impartiality has been demonstrated in the past with several cases, one case in particular stands out. The case of Alexander Mathew against a Dutch government official, Ben Vocking whom now goes by the name of Ben King .

    In this particular case documents disappeared, forensic reports were over looked and witnesses were denied, these documents were in the favor of Alexander Mathew. Paul van der Sloot is a high ranking official in the judicial system and is close friends with Ben King, whom now works at the prosecution office. King was reportedly seen visiting Paul van der Sloot at his home when the Arubian police were performing a search of the van der Sloot residence. Mathew's entire case was tampered with.

    King said that his friend Paul van der Sloot helped him in the Mathew case. How many cases has and will Paul van der Sloot help cover up?

However, I do find it curious that an official so close to the PM would 1) change his name and 2) exercise such poor judgement in the Natalee Holloway case that it now appears he has taken a vacation and, from all appearances, will continue to be of assistance or support to the Van der Sloot's in some way.

An article I found in Dutch - scroll down to fifth article - looked curious, so I asked Begga from Hasibokos to translate.

Translation: The Public Ministry (Aruban prosecutor's office) affirmed that Ben King, head of the support division of the Attorney General, was present at the house of the Van der Sloot family when it was being searched Thursday last week.

Spokesperson Marianne Croes, of the prosecutor's office: “King was and is on holiday. He was indeed not present on behalf of the PM (during the search of the van der Sloot estate)” The spokesperson doesn’t want to comment on the various observations that find it strange that a member of the PM was present at the house of the suspects family while the search took place.

Sources within the PM affirm however that the PM as a whole is not happy at all with the actions of Ben King, because this may raise doubts with regard to the impartiality of the ministry. .

King himself says that he and his family have been good friends with the Van der Sloots for some years now. Paul van der Sloot also worked for the PM in the past. King: “A few years ago, when I was working at KIA (local prison), I was maltreated by a prisoner and went through a rough period during which the Van der Sloot family provided us with fantastic support. We want to do the same for them now. But I realize naturally that I cannot stand at both sides on the line.”

And because of this King took some time off from his job to be able to support his friends. King: “It is a small island where conclusions are drawn very fast.” Both Public Ministry and I realize that we have to remain cool-headed. At the same time I have my rights as private-citizen and I want to support my friends in this difficult period.” Ben King was formerly named Vocking, he changed his name a few months ago and his name is now officially King.

http://tinyurl.com/yl6lk3


Title: Re: Poker game
Post by: lili on November 28, 2006, 08:21:08 AM
Quote from: "IBE"
Anna and all Good Monkeys,

Keep going on the Good Works!

Remember the rumor that the "elders" were in the Sloot house that night for a poker game? Maybe they were there "when something bad happened" and this is the reason for such a big amount of curruption and coverup?

Just thoughts IMO

IBE


Actually completely agree with you.  I believe that Witt was there as well.


Title: Re: King
Post by: San on November 28, 2006, 08:32:16 AM
Quote from: "Tylergal"
Quote from: "IBE"
And it was King who changed his name after the Mathews case?

Where human rights were proofed to be violated and I think, evidence was changed or lost. I believe that Paulus van der Sloot also worked on that case with King.

Also, wasn't it King withwhom the Sloots stayed while Joran was in prison? using the excuse of staying away from the media at their home and the cementing of the pool area?

Correct me if I am wrong. Thanks

IBE


Yes, the Sloots stayed at Ben King's while Joran was in prison and there was suspicion that Joran was coming home at nights with Ben King and spending nights there instead of in Kia.  Also, Paulus is the one who helped Ben (Voc)King during the episode that involved Matthews, for which the United Nations (not that I love that organization) and Amnesty International as well as other organizations were scrutinizing Ben Voc(King) and possibly PVDS for their illegal and inhumane actions.  

One of the posters at RWV lived on the same street as Ben VocKing and verified that the Sloots were staying there.

This is why I believe Paulus is capable of murder along with Joran.  I always said that Paulus could have made the decision not to help a severely injured Natalee.  He makes me sick.

Also, De Vries said last night that the police wanted to search areas of the Van der Sloot property and they were not allowed.  Apparently one of the areas was the garden.  In Paulus' statement he said he was working in his garden.  What was Paulus hiding in the garden.  Could it have been Natalee's clothes, shoes or even Natalee depending who was helping him that day.  Or could it have been Joran's K-Swiss sneakers.  Either way they did not want those search dogs around the property.  Is the garden the Plain View we are talking about.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #549 11/27 - 11/28/2006
Post by: klaasend on November 28, 2006, 08:34:57 AM
Posted by MF at FOB:


As we all know de Vries in his program talked about a leak of information in which he said that in the beginning of the case, Mr Carlo contacted Karen Jansen and asked to meet since he had information for her. They met after hours at Karen's Office (secret ?) where he told her that he has information and needed to get it off his chest. That Joran has had an active role in the disappearance of Natalee Holloway but he cannot proof it, that it is up to her to do that. De Vries' words.

Later in the case, Janssen send him a letter in which she referred their conversation and Carlo replied that it was not what he told her.

Today Carlo, denied ever saying that to Janssen, that in anyway accused Joran or said something about Joran's having a role in Natalee's disappearance. He acknowledged their meeting, but had to do with internal proceedings and also acknowledged communication afterwards.

He said that de Vries' claims are unfounded and also recorded in his office without any authorization as we can see that he had a hidden camera and he reminded that on November 30, 2006 he will be in court to ask the legal investigation be stopped against his client.


GOODMORNING ALL!  Reminder I'm just lurking this morning prior to class. :wink:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #549 11/27 - 11/28/2006
Post by: Peaches on November 28, 2006, 08:37:56 AM
Quote from: "bleachedblack"
Tylergal wrote;
Quote
I thought everyone was pretty nice to Dutch Lady. She never posted much on the Lively. She posted in other areas. She was a difficult read, at best but interesting to say the least and always insightful.


She really did take alot of bashing at times......sometimes I think she would sound so absolutely positive of what she was "seeing" that people took it wrong and thought of her as a psychic, which I think was not the case. She may have been in part, or at least a person with "special gifts", but I know she is a criminologist and gains insight into who may have perpetrated a particular crime by doing some type of triangulation of the suspects movements around the time a crime was commited.


Good morning.  I was always fascinated by Dutchlady's posts.  I think many times she was right on top of it.  I wish she would pop back in and share her current thoughts on the case.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #549 11/27 - 11/28/2006
Post by: igsigs on November 28, 2006, 08:41:51 AM
Quote from: "klaasend"
Today Carlo, denied ever saying that to Janssen, that in anyway accused Joran or said something about Joran's having a role in Natalee's disappearance. He acknowledged their meeting, but had to do with internal proceedings.

Internal proceedings? lol


Title: Lively Case Discussion #549 11/27 - 11/28/2006
Post by: jill on November 28, 2006, 08:48:51 AM
Quote from: "Red"
I would just like to say thank you to Klaas for all the hard work she put forth on the statements.

Way to go ... Time well spent.

Klaas rocks  :wink:


All of you rock!

I came here today after not visiting for awhile - FOX this morning made mention of "new info" in the case and had a snippet from DeVries.

KUDOS to each and every one of you for sticking by Natalee and her family.  If anyone is able to find the truth, it will be you guys.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #549 11/27 - 11/28/2006
Post by: Peaches on November 28, 2006, 08:51:08 AM
Quote from: "Angiex911dsptchr"
Quote from: "bleachedblack"
Night cubbeegirl .


  BB  Love your Gilda Monkey  ROFL~!!
 She was my absolute FAV on SNL!! Good ol days with her and Bill Murry. jane Curtain etc..  :)


Gilda was always my favorite as well.  I remember a special she did where she sang "Let's Talk Dirty To The Animals".  It was hysterical.  

I read her book about her fight with ovarian cancer.  She started Gilda's Club to provide support for other ovarian cancer sufferers.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #549 11/27 - 11/28/2006
Post by: San on November 28, 2006, 08:51:44 AM
I would like to know how does a judge visiting the home of two of the suspects have the power to overturn a search warrant.  Was this Judge Witt the one who originally approved the search warrant?  He was not on official duty when he was at the Sloots.  It wasn't like the police knocked on the door and said by the way Judge can you change the wording in the search warrant before we start.  He abused his power for a murderer.  He should be investigated and brought up on charges.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #549 11/27 - 11/28/2006
Post by: bleachedblack on November 28, 2006, 08:53:57 AM
Quote from: "klaasend"
Posted by MF at FOB:


As we all know de Vries in his program talked about a leak of information in which he said that in the beginning of the case, Mr Carlo contacted Karen Jansen and asked to meet since he had information for her. They met after hours at Karen's Office (secret ?) where he told her that he has information and needed to get it off his chest. That Joran has had an active role in the disappearance of Natalee Holloway but he cannot proof it, that it is up to her to do that. De Vries' words.

Later in the case, Janssen send him a letter in which she referred their conversation and Carlo replied that it was not what he told her.

Today Carlo, denied ever saying that to Janssen, that in anyway accused Joran or said something about Joran's having a role in Natalee's disappearance. He acknowledged their meeting, but had to do with internal proceedings and also acknowledged communication afterwards.

He said that de Vries' claims are unfounded and also recorded in his office without any authorization as we can see that he had a hidden camera and he reminded that on November 30, 2006 he will be in court to ask the legal investigation be stopped against his client.


GOODMORNING ALL!  Reminder I'm just lurking this morning prior to class. :wink:


That is an interesting post, thanks for bringing  it over Klaas. This is an interesting excerpt of an interview in which Tim Miller also speaks about a source that seemed very certain that JVDS was guilty.

+++++++++++++++++++++++++++

MILLER: I've spent a lot of time with the Police Commissioner van der Straaten, and he told me that he has got enough stuff without a body for prosecution. Our deal is to bring Natalee home. That family needs that body. They need to be able to say goodbye and start their healing process.

Natalee is not alive. I'm sorry. And somebody knows. And now we're starting to get angry our own self. We're searchers over here on their island, but now I'm getting angry.

http://tinyurl.com/yd96ay


Title: Lively Case Discussion #549 11/27 - 11/28/2006
Post by: bleachedblack on November 28, 2006, 08:58:49 AM
Quote from: "San"
I would like to know how does a judge visiting the home of two of the suspects have the power to overturn a search warrant.  Was this Judge Witt the one who originally approved the search warrant?  He was not on official duty when he was at the Sloots.  It wasn't like the police knocked on the door and said by the way Judge can you change the wording in the search warrant before we start.  He abused his power for a murderer.  He should be investigated and brought up on charges.


I have been searching old articles/interviews for mention of the fact that DeWitt is the one who actually overturned the search warrant. Is this a true fact San ? ....just wondering as I have read KJ was present went the "walk-through" of the Sloot residence was done and then it says 2 officers with suitcases walked through the house and confiscated 2 bags of unknown home contents....later to be learned by Anita that these items included her camera, computer, etc.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #549 11/27 - 11/28/2006
Post by: cubbeegirl on November 28, 2006, 09:01:30 AM
Quote from: "San"
I would like to know how does a judge visiting the home of two of the suspects have the power to overturn a search warrant.  Was this Judge Witt the one who originally approved the search warrant?  He was not on official duty when he was at the Sloots.  It wasn't like the police knocked on the door and said by the way Judge can you change the wording in the search warrant before we start.  He abused his power for a murderer.  He should be investigated and brought up on charges.



Absolutely!


Title: Lively Case Discussion #549 11/27 - 11/28/2006
Post by: San on November 28, 2006, 09:04:28 AM
There is something coming up on Fox on the case.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #549 11/27 - 11/28/2006
Post by: cubbeegirl on November 28, 2006, 09:05:35 AM
Fox news to be discussing it in a few minutes.....FINALLY the rest of the world will know what we have known for quite some time! I am hopeful once more...


Title: Lively Case Discussion #549 11/27 - 11/28/2006
Post by: bleachedblack on November 28, 2006, 09:06:26 AM
Quote from: "Peaches"
Quote from: "Angiex911dsptchr"
Quote from: "bleachedblack"
Night cubbeegirl .


  BB  Love your Gilda Monkey  ROFL~!!
 She was my absolute FAV on SNL!! Good ol days with her and Bill Murry. jane Curtain etc..  :)


Gilda was always my favorite as well.  I remember a special she did where she sang "Let's Talk Dirty To The Animals".  It was hysterical.  

I read her book about her fight with ovarian cancer.  She started Gilda's Club to provide support for other ovarian cancer sufferers.


Thanks Peaches, I have always thought she was a comic genious youtube has an hilarious Gilda parody of a Jorache  jeans commercial, but she calls hers Jewess Jeans, you should check-it-out, I didn't want to link least some take offense to it, but she is a real hoot!


Title: Lively Case Discussion #549 11/27 - 11/28/2006
Post by: SunFreak2 on November 28, 2006, 09:10:25 AM
Quote from: "Anna"

OK, get this--at the time we heard rumor that he, the judge Bob Witt, was physically staying with the Sloots in their home!  Like a guest I suppose while he worked on the island, etc.  And that because this was his normal accommodation when there, he knew the sleeping arrangements, etc. of the younger Sloots.

It was also said that he speculated that it would be highly improper to search the main house since he was staying there.  

This needs to be sent to deVries as rumor of the time for his investigation as well.  It does make sense and would explain what he the judge was doing at the property to be searched in the first place.

Surely not???  But it does add up.

.


It was Rick Smid, not Bob Witt that was rumored to be Paulus's house guest & buddy.  Smid is the one who freed Joran in September.

Now Witt was the one who ordered J2K to be sent to KIA, and also allowed Joran's Mom, but not his Dad to visit Joran.  He also extended the detention of J2K.
Judge Witt (http://i67.photobucket.com/albums/h291/SunFreak2/JudgeWitt.jpg)


Title: Lively Case Discussion #549 11/27 - 11/28/2006
Post by: San on November 28, 2006, 09:10:34 AM
Quote from: "bleachedblack"
Quote from: "San"
I would like to know how does a judge visiting the home of two of the suspects have the power to overturn a search warrant.  Was this Judge Witt the one who originally approved the search warrant?  He was not on official duty when he was at the Sloots.  It wasn't like the police knocked on the door and said by the way Judge can you change the wording in the search warrant before we start.  He abused his power for a murderer.  He should be investigated and brought up on charges.


I have been searching old articles/interviews for mention of the fact that DeWitt is the one who actually overturned the search warrant. Is this a true fact San ? ....just wondering as I have read KJ was present went the "walk-through" of the Sloot residence was done and then it says 2 officers with suitcases walked through the house and confiscated 2 bags of unknown home contents....later to be learned by Anita that these items included her camera, computer, etc.


Bleached this is what De Vries said last night.

Peter:  Well the search in the home address of the family Van der Sloot is very strange because the search warrant was made by Head Prosecutor Karin Janssen and contained an allowance to search the whole address Mon 19.  But when the police was on the spot another high ranking employee of the Justice Office it was Mr. Bob Witt reduced the search warrant to only the room of Joran and that’s very strange. The police was extremely frustrated about this because they had some clues that something might have happened to Natalee elsewhere in the garden or in the house of the parents because Joran admits that he has been with Natalee and Deepak and Satish at the home of his parents.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #549 11/27 - 11/28/2006
Post by: klaasend on November 28, 2006, 09:10:42 AM
Posted by Tjeerd at FOB:

The tape of the show concerning the cocaine goes as follows:

(Commenter) Joran and Natalee were attracted to each other. There was no or hardly no obstacle to go to his appartment.

Witnesses say Natalee was drinking very great amounts of alcohol. Two witnesses say she carried drugs with her (a shot of a PV shown  reads: (..) Natalee asked me if I would like to sniff some cocaine)


Which means, it did NOT come from the MB kids but from some other "witness", most likely bought and paid for by the VDS family or Renfro.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #549 11/27 - 11/28/2006
Post by: Kimmy53 on November 28, 2006, 09:12:41 AM
Good Morning Monkeys!  Good to see each of you this morning. - Working and lurking as usual.  Going back to read and catch up.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #549 11/27 - 11/28/2006
Post by: bleachedblack on November 28, 2006, 09:18:22 AM
San wrote;
Quote
Peter: Well the search in the home address of the family Van der Sloot is very strange because the search warrant was made by Head Prosecutor Karin Janssen and contained an allowance to search the whole address Mon 19. But when the police was on the spot another high ranking employee of the Justice Office it was Mr. Bob Witt reduced the search warrant to only the room of Joran and that’s very strange.  The police was extremely frustrated about this because they had some clues that something might have happened to Natalee elsewhere in the garden or in the house of the parents because Joran admits that he has been with Natalee and Deepak and Satish at the home of his parents.


Hmmmmmm thanks San what now strikes me funny about that scenario though , and it may be minor, but aren't search warrants issued only by a judge?....or is that just in the US? .....prosecutor don't issue search warrants simply because that  alone would be a conflict of interest? So did DeWitt possibly limit his own search warrant?


Title: Lively Case Discussion #549 11/27 - 11/28/2006
Post by: San on November 28, 2006, 09:21:18 AM
Quote from: "klaasend"
Posted by Tjeerd at FOB:

The tape of the show concerning the cocaine goes as follows:

(Commenter) Joran and Natalee were attracted to each other. There was no or hardly no obstacle to go to his appartment.

Witnesses say Natalee was drinking very great amounts of alcohol. Two witnesses say she carried drugs with her (a shot of a PV shown  reads: (..) Natalee asked me if I would like to sniff some cocaine)


Which means, it did NOT come from the MB kids but from some other "witness", most likely bought and paid for by the VDS family or Renfro.

And De Vries couldn't see through this.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #549 11/27 - 11/28/2006
Post by: bleachedblack on November 28, 2006, 09:23:28 AM
Sorry meant to write Witt.......it's still early for me   :oops:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #549 11/27 - 11/28/2006
Post by: Anna on November 28, 2006, 09:28:04 AM
Quote from: "SunFreak2"
Quote from: "Anna"

OK, get this--at the time we heard rumor that he, the judge Bob Witt, was physically staying with the Sloots in their home!  Like a guest I suppose while he worked on the island, etc.  And that because this was his normal accommodation when there, he knew the sleeping arrangements, etc. of the younger Sloots.

It was also said that he speculated that it would be highly improper to search the main house since he was staying there.  

This needs to be sent to deVries as rumor of the time for his investigation as well.  It does make sense and would explain what he the judge was doing at the property to be searched in the first place.

Surely not???  But it does add up.

.


It was Rick Smid, not Bob Witt that was rumored to be Paulus's house guest & buddy.  Smid is the one who freed Joran in September.

Now Witt was the one who ordered J2K to be sent to KIA, and also allowed Joran's Mom, but not his Dad to visit Joran.  He also extended the detention of J2K.
Judge Witt (http://i67.photobucket.com/albums/h291/SunFreak2/JudgeWitt.jpg)


Well, I guess that would depend on which rumor you were hearing, wouldn't it? What I was told in the beginning was that whichever judge was in Aruba from Curacao was usually offered quarters at the Sloot resident.

DeVries is saying it was Witt who just happened to be present and on the spot and change the stipulations of the search warrant, not Smid.

We have no way of knowing if this is true but it is something that perhaps the deVries team could research as they would have ways and means we do not have.

IBE,

Yes, there was talk of judicial poker games, sometimes at the Sloots.  Not sure if on the night in question but I do recall hearing that one as well very early.

My, we were a rumored lot, especially those first 3-4 weeks.  But oddly enough, my basic theory hasn't changed in all this time.

.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #549 11/27 - 11/28/2006
Post by: Anna on November 28, 2006, 09:32:27 AM
Quote from: "bleachedblack"
San wrote;
Quote
Peter: Well the search in the home address of the family Van der Sloot is very strange because the search warrant was made by Head Prosecutor Karin Janssen and contained an allowance to search the whole address Mon 19. But when the police was on the spot another high ranking employee of the Justice Office it was Mr. Bob Witt reduced the search warrant to only the room of Joran and that’s very strange.  The police was extremely frustrated about this because they had some clues that something might have happened to Natalee elsewhere in the garden or in the house of the parents because Joran admits that he has been with Natalee and Deepak and Satish at the home of his parents.


Hmmmmmm thanks San what now strikes me funny about that scenario though , and it may be minor, but aren't search warrants issued only by a judge?....or is that just in the US? .....prosecutor don't issue search warrants simply because that  alone would be a conflict of interest? So did DeWitt possibly limit his own search warrant?



Goodmorning, BB,

Did you see our posts from last night??  We want to know who signed that first search warrant.  CBB is even offering smoochies to whomever can find who signed the original search warrant for the Sloot residence.

That is exactly the question.  Did Witt have the authority to do this on the spot as is claimed he did.  I would think not even if it was he who signed the original as it denies KJ the right of formal protest and to protest his action.

I don't remember her participating in the search at the Sloots.  Certainly she was not there at 6:30 a.m., arms akimbo as for the search and arrest of the security guards, not visibly at any rate as she was for their arrest.  Very odd considering she already knew the J2Kwere lying about the HI drop off.

.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #549 11/27 - 11/28/2006
Post by: bleachedblack on November 28, 2006, 09:33:35 AM
Quote from: "SunFreak2"
Quote from: "Anna"

OK, get this--at the time we heard rumor that he, the judge Bob Witt, was physically staying with the Sloots in their home!  Like a guest I suppose while he worked on the island, etc.  And that because this was his normal accommodation when there, he knew the sleeping arrangements, etc. of the younger Sloots.

It was also said that he speculated that it would be highly improper to search the main house since he was staying there.  

This needs to be sent to deVries as rumor of the time for his investigation as well.  It does make sense and would explain what he the judge was doing at the property to be searched in the first place.

Surely not???  But it does add up.

.


It was Rick Smid, not Bob Witt that was rumored to be Paulus's house guest & buddy.  Smid is the one who freed Joran in September.

Now Witt was the one who ordered J2K to be sent to KIA, and also allowed Joran's Mom, but not his Dad to visit Joran.  He also extended the detention of J2K.
Judge Witt (http://i67.photobucket.com/albums/h291/SunFreak2/JudgeWitt.jpg)


Hmmmmmmm, thanks Sunfreak2 I see I was totally confused about the name then. Reading to many sources ......see why I am confuse about who was at the house when the search was conducted.......this source (which is by no means gospel ) says that Ben King was reportedly at the house when searched. So were King and Smid there ya think?

I think this was written by Alexander Mathew, so the source certainly has an axe to grind.....

++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++

. King was reportedly seen visiting Paul van der Sloot at his home when the Arubian police were performing a search of the van der Sloot residence.

http://tinyurl.com/y5w64o


Title: Lively Case Discussion #549 11/27 - 11/28/2006
Post by: SunFreak2 on November 28, 2006, 09:37:23 AM
Here is all the info I was able to gather on the Judges involved in this case and who did what each step of the way.  A lot of times in the news articles, they never mentioned the judges name.

I suspect it was either Judge Witt or Judge van der Brink who signed the original search warrant.  The search at the Slots was on  6-15-05.


JUDGES -

Rick Smid  – Reportedly a friend of PVDS who stayed at VDS home.  Judge who released J2K in September 2005.  Dutch judge in Curacao.  As a public prosecutor in the NL, participated in the Carribean Financial Task Force as expert on money laundering.


Dick van den Brink  - Curacao criminal judge, Judge of Instruction, 6-12-05 who extended custody of J2K.  Released Johns & Jones(?)


Luis de Lannoy  - President of the Common Court of Appeals of Justice of the Netherlands Antilles and Aruba.


Judge J.S. Kuiperdal  – JOI with Jones & Johns, extended custody


Bob Witt  – Dutch Judge ruled on 6-17-05 that Paulus van der  Sloot cannot visit Prime Suspect J. Sloot in jail, but that Joran’s Mother may do so (and she did on 6-18). Extended J2K  custody on 6-17-05, and OK’d the transfer to KIA.
(http://i67.photobucket.com/albums/h291/SunFreak2/JudgeWitt.jpg)


Title: Lively Case Discussion #549 11/27 - 11/28/2006
Post by: Anna on November 28, 2006, 09:38:13 AM
Quote from: "klaasend"
Posted by Tjeerd at FOB:

The tape of the show concerning the cocaine goes as follows:

(Commenter) Joran and Natalee were attracted to each other. There was no or hardly no obstacle to go to his appartment.

Witnesses say Natalee was drinking very great amounts of alcohol. Two witnesses say she carried drugs with her (a shot of a PV shown  reads: (..) Natalee asked me if I would like to sniff some cocaine)


Which means, it did NOT come from the MB kids but from some other "witness", most likely bought and paid for by the VDS family or Renfro.



Klaas,
So there are no PV's of statements from the MB kids meaning this had to come from a "witness" in Aruba?

Now I wonder which little PIMP said that.  I really want to know and want it pinned down as to credibility.  Maybe it was Bouti after all, lol!  No, I doubt him but I further doubt that Natalee was that chummy with anyone locally.  Both her parents have questioned the other MB kids extensively and in the three short days she was there, 83 hours including sleeping time, I have not encountered any accounts of her spending any time with locals but just the opposite.  Both accounts by her parents say she stayed exclusively with her group.

Who could this be who claims otherwise??

.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #549 11/27 - 11/28/2006
Post by: bleachedblack on November 28, 2006, 09:38:20 AM
Anna wrote;
Quote
Did you see our posts from last night?? We want to know who signed that first search warrant. CBB is even offering smoochies to whomever can find who signed the original search warrant for the Sloot residence.

That is exactly the question. Did Witt have the authority to do this on the spot as is claimed he did. I would think not even if it was he who signed the original as it denies KJ the right of formal protest and to protest his action.

I don't remember her participating in the search at the Sloots. Certainly she was not there at 6:30 a.m., arms akimbo as for the search and arrest of the security guards, not visibly at any rate as she was for their arrest. Very odd considering she already knew the J2Kwere lying about the HI drop off.


Thanks Anna I will see what I can dig up about the signing of the search warrant. I will also double check, but I believe 2 separate sources I have read this am stated KJ was at the house at the time of the search??


Title: Lively Case Discussion #549 11/27 - 11/28/2006
Post by: Altruist on November 28, 2006, 09:43:04 AM
Wouldn't doubt if the last OFFICIAL task of Janssen is to ensure the PVDS & JVDS would not be held accountable along with their co-conspirator's by discrediting the Defense Attorney Carlos by implying that the Attorney/Client Priviledge had been violated.  

Corruption aplenty.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #549 11/27 - 11/28/2006
Post by: bleachedblack on November 28, 2006, 09:46:09 AM
I guess my sources leave something to be desired?  :shock:

+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
Officers on the scene would not comment, and police spokesman Edwin Comemencia said he had no information.

At about 3:30 p.m. EDT, half a dozen investigators left the scene. A short time later, several other investigators, carried out several paper bags and loaded them into the back of a small white hatchback and drove off.

About 15 minutes later, a police minivan arrived, along with six or seven new investigators and a police dog. This new team spoke with a prosecutor outside the home, then went in.

http://tinyurl.com/tdffw



Janssen, who went into the house with investigators Wednesday, declined to discuss the case, but said the father was not under investigation. Paul van der Sloot is a judge-in-training, serving a three-year term that allows him to hear a limited number of cases.

http://tinyurl.com/wjzbo


Title: Lively Case Discussion #549 11/27 - 11/28/2006
Post by: msmarple on November 28, 2006, 09:46:21 AM
A couple of articles in today's Diario (Local):

 
Quote
segun programa di Peter R de Vries, ABOGADO DI JORAN A BISA FISCAL CU JORAN TABATA TIN ROL GRANDI DEN DESAPARICION DI NATALEE HOLLOWAY
ORANJESTAD(AAN): Husticia di Aruba a yuda stroba investigacion den e caso di desaparicion di Natalee Holloway. Esaki tabata conclusion di e programa “Peter R de Vries, Misdaadverslaggever”, cu a pasa na television Hulandes Diadomingo anochi.

Peter de Vries algun tempo pasa tabata na Aruba, na unda el a pasa tambe na DIARIO pa haya algun informacion, pa yuda cu e investigacion cu e tabata conduci relaciona cu e caso di desaparicion di e hoben Mericano. Den su programa Diadomingo el a papia tocante di e problema cu lo a surgi entre Procurador General y fiscal Karen Jansen.

 
Quote
segun abogado Carlo, INFORMACION DI PETER DE VRIES TA INCORECTO, INFUNDA Y TENDENSIOSOORANJESTAD(AAN): Mirando cu den e programa “Peter R. de Vries, Misdaadverslaggever” a wordo bisa cu abogado Anthoni Carlo, kende ta abogado di Joran van der Sloot, lo a tuma contacto cu fiscal Karen Janssen pa bise cu Joran tin un rol grandi den desaparicion di Natalee Holloway, DIARIO a tuma contacto cu e abogado pa e duna su banda di e medaya.

E abogado a splica cu Peter de Vries y demas hende di su programa a bin na su oficina y a cuminza papia cune tocante di e caso y nan a cuminza filma sin su autorizacion. Carlo a splica DIARIO cu ora cu de Vries a puntre tocante di e echo cu e lo a bisa fiscal cu su cliente sa mas di e desaparicion, el a nenga esaki rotundamente.


I tried the translator, but can never make much sense out of the result it produces. I *think* that the first one simply talks about de Vries contacting Diario for information. I *think* the second one is a denial by Carlo.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #549 11/27 - 11/28/2006
Post by: bleachedblack on November 28, 2006, 09:50:26 AM
Quote from: "Altruist"
Wouldn't doubt if the last OFFICIAL task of Janssen is to ensure the PVDS & JVDS would not be held accountable along with their co-conspirator's by discrediting the Defense Attorney Carlos by implying that the Attorney/Client Priviledge had been violated.  

Corruption aplenty.


Is KJ related to  Myrna Jansen, Managing Director for the Aruba Tourism Authority? Would you know? If this is the case, then that  is yet another dimension into the conflict -of-interest aspect.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #549 11/27 - 11/28/2006
Post by: Lala'sMom on November 28, 2006, 09:53:29 AM
Quote from: "klaasend"
Posted by Tjeerd at FOB:

The tape of the show concerning the cocaine goes as follows:

(Commenter) Joran and Natalee were attracted to each other. There was no or hardly no obstacle to go to his appartment.

Witnesses say Natalee was drinking very great amounts of alcohol. Two witnesses say she carried drugs with her (a shot of a PV shown  reads: (..) Natalee asked me if I would like to sniff some cocaine)


Which means, it did NOT come from the MB kids but from some other "witness", most likely bought and paid for by the VDS family or Renfro.



So where is this PV?  I want to read it for myself.  This isn't in any of the statements that we have.  I hope someone in the family or elsewhere can get their hands on this statement and let us look at it.  I want to know who said Natalee was using cocaine.  I want to know now!


Title: Lively Case Discussion #549 11/27 - 11/28/2006
Post by: klaasend on November 28, 2006, 09:54:30 AM
Quote from: "Lala'sMom"
Quote from: "klaasend"
Posted by Tjeerd at FOB:

The tape of the show concerning the cocaine goes as follows:

(Commenter) Joran and Natalee were attracted to each other. There was no or hardly no obstacle to go to his appartment.

Witnesses say Natalee was drinking very great amounts of alcohol. Two witnesses say she carried drugs with her (a shot of a PV shown  reads: (..) Natalee asked me if I would like to sniff some cocaine)


Which means, it did NOT come from the MB kids but from some other "witness", most likely bought and paid for by the VDS family or Renfro.



So where is this PV?  I want to read it for myself.  This isn't in any of the statements that we have.  I hope someone in the family or elsewhere can get their hands on this statement and let us look at it.  I want to know who said Natalee was using cocaine.  I want to know now!


Lala's - it was not in any of the PV's we received


Title: Lively Case Discussion #549 11/27 - 11/28/2006
Post by: Altruist on November 28, 2006, 09:54:55 AM
I have no idea BleachedBlack,  in the beginning I had faith in Janssen but that is long ago & now believe that she is a disgrace to the legal profession.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #549 11/27 - 11/28/2006
Post by: Anna on November 28, 2006, 09:55:28 AM
Quote from: "bleachedblack"
[Thanks Anna I will see what I can dig up about the signing of the search warrant. I will also double check, but I believe 2 separate sources I have read this am stated KJ was at the house at the time of the search??


Well, then she probably was there.  Just not mugging for the cameras as she and van der Straaten did at the security guards.

There were several including those in the cute bunny suits as though those are necessary  :roll: but it made for great theater.

Also the FBI was kept outside the fence.  I do recall that part about the FBI being made to observe from outside the compound fence.

.One was observed with q tips taking swabs from on the ground and I believe around the mailbox.  Very odd photos came out of that search.

.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #549 11/27 - 11/28/2006
Post by: BTgirl on November 28, 2006, 10:15:05 AM
Quote from: "klaasend"
Lala's - it was not in any of the PV's we received


Hi monkeys.

Ummm....what's a PV?  :oops:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #549 11/27 - 11/28/2006
Post by: Lala'sMom on November 28, 2006, 10:15:17 AM
Klaas
I know that, I was being sarcastic.  On the other hand, if there is a photo of this PV, then someone has it besides the ALE, right? :wink:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #549 11/27 - 11/28/2006
Post by: crazybabyborg on November 28, 2006, 10:17:23 AM
Morning!
If KJ was at the house, she's got bigger problems than being blonde. She's part of the corruption. Last night, DeVries said,
Peter: Well the search in the home address of the family Van der Sloot is very strange because the search warrant was made by Head Prosecutor Karin Janssen and contained an allowance to search the whole address Mon 19. But when the police was on the spot another high ranking employee of the Justice Office it was Mr. Bob Witt reduced the search warrant to only the room of Joran and that’s very strange. The police was extremely frustrated about this because they had some clues that something might have happened to Natalee elsewhere in the garden or in the house of the parents because Joran admits that he has been with Natalee and Deepak and Satish at the home of his parents.
I believe the reference to the warrant being made by KJ was probably meant as KJ requested the warrant with specific inclusions and was  granted by a judge the warrant as she wrote it. If that decision was summarily altered by her superior "on the scene" and she didn't kick her way to the news media crowded around the entrance, she is culpable. Worse case scernario is she helped coordinate the obstruction and did indeed help orchestrate Paulus's "lawyer" status to watch Carlos.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #549 11/27 - 11/28/2006
Post by: carpe noctem on November 28, 2006, 10:22:10 AM
Quote from: "klaasend"
Note to JR Dutch Attorney at FOB

In case you weren't aware, when we refer to JR we are talking about Julia Renfro, not you.  Actually, we don't give you a second thought



(http://i37.photobucket.com/albums/e82/klaasend2/JuliaWitch-1.gif)


Hubba Hubba Ding Ding!!! Da Renfrrrrro

She's a hottie. (nottie)

I wonder if  that broom can fly straight through...

Or does she have to switch brooms in Atlanta. :lol:

J4N everybody!


Title: Lively Case Discussion #549 11/27 - 11/28/2006
Post by: Anna on November 28, 2006, 10:32:19 AM
Quote from: "bleachedblack"
I guess my sources leave something to be desired?  :shock:

+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
Officers on the scene would not comment, and police spokesman Edwin Comemencia said he had no information.

At about 3:30 p.m. EDT, half a dozen investigators left the scene. A short time later, several other investigators, carried out several paper bags and loaded them into the back of a small white hatchback and drove off.

About 15 minutes later, a police minivan arrived, along with six or seven new investigators and a police dog. This new team spoke with a prosecutor outside the home, then went in.

http://tinyurl.com/tdffw



Janssen, who went into the house with investigators Wednesday, declined to discuss the case, but said the father was not under investigation. Paul van der Sloot is a judge-in-training, serving a three-year term that allows him to hear a limited number of cases.

http://tinyurl.com/wjzbo


No, pls see my previous post.  She was evidently present for the search.  I wonder what they mean went inside the house.  The main house or Joran's apartment.  Inside for a drink with her friends the Sloots or why was she going inside the house?

If there is anything unprofessional to do, they will manage to do it every time.  :?

.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #549 11/27 - 11/28/2006
Post by: San on November 28, 2006, 10:36:20 AM
Quote from: "Anna"
Quote from: "bleachedblack"
[Thanks Anna I will see what I can dig up about the signing of the search warrant. I will also double check, but I believe 2 separate sources I have read this am stated KJ was at the house at the time of the search??


Well, then she probably was there.  Just not mugging for the cameras as she and van der Straaten did at the security guards.

There were several including those in the cute bunny suits as though those are necessary  :roll: but it made for great theater.

Also the FBI was kept outside the fence.  I do recall that part about the FBI being made to observe from outside the compound fence.

.One was observed with q tips taking swabs from on the ground and I believe around the mailbox.  Very odd photos came out of that search.

.


Arubans search Dutch boy's home
Police detain Joran van der Sloot, 2 others; no one charged in case

By Peter Prengaman
Associated Press Writer


NOORD, Aruba — Aruban police Wednesday searched the home of a high-ranking Dutch judicial official whose son was with a Mountain Brook honors student the night she disappeared, carrying out plastic garbage bags full of items and towing away two vehicles.

Earlier, the official, Paul van der Sloot, asked a judge for permission to see his 17-year-old son, Joran, who remains in police custody with two other young men in the May 30 disappearance of Natalee Holloway, 18.

Lawyers for the three — Joran van der Sloot and brothers Deepak Kalpoe, 21, and Satish Kalpoe, 18 — also asked a judge to see the evidence against their clients.

Holloway was celebrating her graduation from Mountain Brook High School with 124 other students and seven chaperones when she vanished during the early hours of May 30. Her U.S. passport and packed bags were found in her room.

Numerous searches by authorities, volunteer islanders and tourists have led nowhere. No one has been charged in the case.

On Tuesday, FBI agents and officers from the Miami-Dade police department used German Shepherds to search a beachside mangrove swamp next to the Marriott Hotel after a former detainee in the case said the three young men may have lied to police about where they took Holloway. The area, known as Malmok beach, is a popular nighttime spot for lovers.

The three initially said they took Holloway to a beach on the northern part of the island but dropped her off at her Holiday Inn, where they claim she was approached by a security guard.

Wednesday's search of the van der Sloot home lasted about four hours. Two white-uniformed investigators from Holland carried suitcases into the one-story, yellow-beige home, which includes an attached apartment where the young man lives. They later returned the suitcases to their white, unmarked car.

Investigators also emerged from the house carrying two white plastic garbage bags full of unidentified items. A German Shepherd also sniffed around the property outside the capital, Oranjestad.

Towed vehicles

Authorities towed a blue sport utility vehicle and a red Jeep away from the house, which is surrounded by a low stone wall and fronted by an expanse of trees and cacti.

"The search is part of the investigation," said Mariaine Croes, a spokeswoman for Attorney General Caren Janssen.

Croes said both cars belonged to the family, but she did not say why they were taken away.

Janssen, who also went into the house, declined to comment as investigators wrapped up their search at about 4 p.m. Six police officers guarded the entrance to the property.

"We are just looking for evidence at the house but have nothing yet," police spokesman Edwin Comemencia said during the search.

Earlier, Paul van der Sloot filed a motion for permission to see his son, Comemencia said, while Ruud Oomen, the lawyer representing Deepak Kalpoe, said he filed a motion to force the prosecution to hand over "all the evidence against my client."

The three young men also were in court.

The Dutch youth's lawyer, Antonio Carlo, and Janssen refused to comment as they left the courthouse.

Croes would only say that four court proceedings took place in connection with the case Wednesday.

http://www.decaturdaily.com/decaturdaily/news/050616/dutch.shtml


Title: Lively Case Discussion #549 11/27 - 11/28/2006
Post by: Anna on November 28, 2006, 10:39:34 AM
Quote from: "Altruist"
Wouldn't doubt if the last OFFICIAL task of Janssen is to ensure the PVDS & JVDS would not be held accountable along with their co-conspirator's by discrediting the Defense Attorney Carlos by implying that the Attorney/Client Priviledge had been violated.  

Corruption aplenty.



 :shock:  :shock:  :shock:

I certainly hope that is not where that information is going.  Makes me ill to think about it but anything is possible.  Like van der Straaten, I think she will not leave until Paulus and Joran are all squared away and then she will not stay one minute longer to be held accountable for anything.

It's not as though she could be fired, either, since she is retiring already.

But if she was physically present for the search, why on earth would she just allow it to be of Joran's apartment only if she was holding in hand a search warrant for the entire compound?  The cops, who answer to her, could remove from the premises anybody blocking this search, including Paulus himself.  Or the judge who was strangely present.

That's why search warrants are executed by members of LE.  So why were those obstructing the search not removed and the search conducted as per warrant?


Title: Lively Case Discussion #549 11/27 - 11/28/2006
Post by: BTgirl on November 28, 2006, 10:40:08 AM
Quote from: "carpe noctem"
Quote from: "klaasend"
Note to JR Dutch Attorney at FOB

In case you weren't aware, when we refer to JR we are talking about Julia Renfro, not you.  Actually, we don't give you a second thought



(http://i37.photobucket.com/albums/e82/klaasend2/JuliaWitch-1.gif)


Hubba Hubba Ding Ding!!! Da Renfrrrrro

She's a hottie. (nottie)

I wonder if  that broom can fly straight through...

Or does she have to switch brooms in Atlanta. :lol:

J4N everybody!


Well, that's what we say around here - if you went to hell you'd have to go through Atlanta to get there.  :lol:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #549 11/27 - 11/28/2006
Post by: BTgirl on November 28, 2006, 10:41:21 AM
Quote from: "Lala'sMom"
Klaas
I know that, I was being sarcastic.  On the other hand, if there is a photo of this PV, then someone has it besides the ALE, right? :wink:


Hi Lala's. What's a PV? I feel really stupid.  :oops:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #549 11/27 - 11/28/2006
Post by: Anna on November 28, 2006, 10:53:22 AM
Quote from: "crazybabyborg"
Morning!
If KJ was at the house, she's got bigger problems than being blonde. She's part of the corruption. Last night, DeVries said,
Peter: Well the search in the home address of the family Van der Sloot is very strange because the search warrant was made by Head Prosecutor Karin Janssen and contained an allowance to search the whole address Mon 19. But when the police was on the spot another high ranking employee of the Justice Office it was Mr. Bob Witt reduced the search warrant to only the room of Joran and that’s very strange. The police was extremely frustrated about this because they had some clues that something might have happened to Natalee elsewhere in the garden or in the house of the parents because Joran admits that he has been with Natalee and Deepak and Satish at the home of his parents.
I believe the reference to the warrant being made by KJ was probably meant as KJ requested the warrant with specific inclusions and was  granted by a judge the warrant as she wrote it. If that decision was summarily altered by her superior "on the scene" and she didn't kick her way to the news media crowded around the entrance, she is culpable. Worse case scenario is she helped coordinate the obstruction and did indeed help orchestrate Paulus's "lawyer" status to watch Carlos.



Sickening, isn't it?  I don't believe she ever intended to prosecute.  And if "hard evidence" is all that is acceptable in court in Aruba, why did they refuse to take any from the suspects for ten days?  Going for wire taps instead when they and certainly KJ knew these are not admissible in court or if they are, they evidently count for nothing.

They could have taken forensics just because the three were the last seen with Natalee, no other reason required.  But not only did they not do that, they gave them ten days to change out the interior of the car and clean up anything, etc. and then only searched Joran's apartment.

The sleeping quarters for the younger brothers would be in the middle sized building, not the "main house" building anyway.  Lock the doors and the younger brothers probably couldn't get into the main house even if they were awakened.  I doubt they bothered Joran much as a matter of routine.

Oh, and they were wearing HazMat suits and the dog present was a drug sniffing dog as Aruba had no cadaver dogs.  Guess they don't need them since their cadavers tend to lie out in the open on beaches and in garbage dumps, etc.

To find something, you have to be looking.  Think Art Collie used to have a signature like that.
 :(
.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #549 11/27 - 11/28/2006
Post by: Anna on November 28, 2006, 10:56:32 AM
Quote from: "BTgirl"
Quote from: "Lala'sMom"
Klaas
I know that, I was being sarcastic.  On the other hand, if there is a photo of this PV, then someone has it besides the ALE, right? :wink:


Hi Lala's. What's a PV? I feel really stupid.  :oops:


"PROCES VERBAAL" or an "official statement" taken by ALE and entered into the record.   :wink:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #549 11/27 - 11/28/2006
Post by: San on November 28, 2006, 10:59:19 AM
Quote from: "Anna"
Quote from: "BTgirl"
Quote from: "Lala'sMom"
Klaas
I know that, I was being sarcastic.  On the other hand, if there is a photo of this PV, then someone has it besides the ALE, right? :wink:


Hi Lala's. What's a PV? I feel really stupid.  :oops:


"PROCES VERBAAL" or an "official statement" taken by ALE and entered into the record.   :wink:

Thank you Anna I was wonder what PV meant also.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #549 11/27 - 11/28/2006
Post by: BTgirl on November 28, 2006, 10:59:29 AM
Quote from: "Anna"
Quote from: "BTgirl"
Quote from: "Lala'sMom"
Klaas
I know that, I was being sarcastic.  On the other hand, if there is a photo of this PV, then someone has it besides the ALE, right? :wink:


Hi Lala's. What's a PV? I feel really stupid.  :oops:


"PROCES VERBAAL" or an "official statement" taken by ALE and entered into the record.   :wink:


Phew! Thanks Anna! I'm here at work trying to get ready for a big meeting I'm having tonight and talking to the monkeys while stuff prints. That was driving me crazy, and I couldn't concentrate on what I was supposed to be doing.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #549 11/27 - 11/28/2006
Post by: crazybabyborg on November 28, 2006, 11:02:16 AM
Quote from: "BTgirl"
Quote from: "Anna"
Quote from: "BTgirl"
Quote from: "Lala'sMom"
Klaas
I know that, I was being sarcastic.  On the other hand, if there is a photo of this PV, then someone has it besides the ALE, right? :wink:


Hi Lala's. What's a PV? I feel really stupid.  :oops:


"PROCES VERBAAL" or an "official statement" taken by ALE and entered into the record.   :wink:


Phew! Thanks Anna! I'm here at work trying to get ready for a big meeting I'm having tonight and talking to the monkeys while stuff prints. That was driving me crazy, and I couldn't concentrate on what I was supposed to be doing.


Me three, Me three! I didn't have a clue...........THANKS!!


Title: Lively Case Discussion #549 11/27 - 11/28/2006
Post by: Anna on November 28, 2006, 11:12:24 AM
The PV's are the statements Klaasend very diligently translated and posted for us using several sources for her translations.  Now we learn from Red that "someone" in The Netherlands has been reading and printing them.   8)

Thank you, Klaas, for doing this.  I know it was a pain at the time but it might have been the very thing that attracted the attention of the deVries crew and enabled this latest coverage of Natalee's disappearance.  You just never know what something will lead to.

.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #549 11/27 - 11/28/2006
Post by: BTgirl on November 28, 2006, 11:14:06 AM
Quote from: "Anna"
The PV's are the statements Klaasend very diligently translated and posted for us using several sources for her translations.  Now we learn from Red that "someone" in The Netherlands has been reading and printing them.   8)

Thank you, Klaas, for doing this.  I know it was a pain at the time but it might have been the very thing that attracted the attention of the deVries crew and enabled this latest coverage of Natalee's disappearance.  You just never know what something will lead to.

.


Thank you, Anna, for saying that so well. Klaas does an amazing amount of work for Natalee's cause.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #549 11/27 - 11/28/2006
Post by: Lala'sMom on November 28, 2006, 11:19:10 AM
PV=process verbal... that was real clear wasn't it...sorry I should have been more clear on that topic. OOOPS!


Title: Lively Case Discussion #549 11/27 - 11/28/2006
Post by: Anna on November 28, 2006, 11:19:59 AM
Now I have a headache and am just plain angry.  If Janssen was present for that search, had a warrant for the entire compound in hand, why didn't she just order the cops to remove Witt or Paulus or King or anybody interfering with carrying out the warrant?  Now why is she telling about Carlos saying Joran was guilty?  Nothing good can come of that that I can see.  Is this some desperate bid to have the entire case thrown out of court now that deVries might uncover some of their tricks?

Why do monkeys think Joran had that sick photo made?  Wassup with that?  And to pay such a price for it, too.  It wasn't just a casual joke on his part to have that kind of investment in it.

Have to go work but this is just maddening.  I don't know how on earth Beth and Dave have kept their wits about them dealing with this.  I just cannot imagine knowing all this and that they are refusing to investigate, etc. and having to deal with them anyway because they are the only ones involved.   :evil:

I am trying to recall if we heard anything else about Paulus and the judges at the beginning.  One thing was that he played golf in Curacao with them.  Does anyone recall anything else?

I will be working and lurking. . . . . .



.


.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #549 11/27 - 11/28/2006
Post by: crazybabyborg on November 28, 2006, 11:20:43 AM
The other thing in the same DeVries statement that caught me was Joran's admission that Natalee had been at his parent's home:

Peter: Well the search in the home address of the family Van der Sloot is very strange because the search warrant was made by Head Prosecutor Karin Janssen and contained an allowance to search the whole address Mon 19. But when the police was on the spot another high ranking employee of the Justice Office it was Mr. Bob Witt reduced the search warrant to only the room of Joran and that’s very strange. The police was extremely frustrated about this because they had some clues that something might have happened to Natalee elsewhere in the garden or in the house of the parents because Joran admits that he has been with Natalee and Deepak and Satish at the home of his parents.

That was news to me, but you can bet he had a reason for admitting it and later denying it. My guess is that it was his effort to cover any "tell-tell" forensic evidence in the house.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #549 11/27 - 11/28/2006
Post by: Shizaru on November 28, 2006, 11:28:51 AM
Quote from: "klaasend"
Posted by Tjeerd at FOB:

The tape of the show concerning the cocaine goes as follows:

(Commenter) Joran and Natalee were attracted to each other. There was no or hardly no obstacle to go to his appartment.

Witnesses say Natalee was drinking very great amounts of alcohol. Two witnesses say she carried drugs with her (a shot of a PV shown  reads: (..) Natalee asked me if I would like to sniff some cocaine)


Which means, it did NOT come from the MB kids but from some other "witness", most likely bought and paid for by the VDS family or Renfro.


Theoretically possible it could be a statement taken from one of the MB kids interviewed in January, and later translated into Dutch. But more likely is from someone in Aruba.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #549 11/27 - 11/28/2006
Post by: Nut44x4 on November 28, 2006, 11:44:40 AM
The question is...will anyone in control make the appropriate arrests or take the appropriate measures to insure that they are taken. Hello......we have all been trying to get the right answer for so long and if we have it...who is in control of it and will THIS EVER GET TO TRIAL of the perps......if not, than this is for not.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #549 11/27 - 11/28/2006
Post by: sharon on November 28, 2006, 11:46:37 AM
Quote from: "Shizaru"
Quote from: "klaasend"
Posted by Tjeerd at FOB:

The tape of the show concerning the cocaine goes as follows:

(Commenter) Joran and Natalee were attracted to each other. There was no or hardly no obstacle to go to his appartment.

Witnesses say Natalee was drinking very great amounts of alcohol. Two witnesses say she carried drugs with her (a shot of a PV shown  reads: (..) Natalee asked me if I would like to sniff some cocaine)


Which means, it did NOT come from the MB kids but from some other "witness", most likely bought and paid for by the VDS family or Renfro.



Theoretically possible it could be a statement taken from one of the MB kids interviewed in January, and later translated into Dutch. But more likely is from someone in Aruba.



Viet Vet made an interesting FP post the other day.

He reminded us that Natalee didn't even have that kind of money with her on the trip to be able to buy cocaine.

(Unless in Aruba the 'all inclusive' in Aruba means more than we thought.)

Again -- it doesn't matter to me if it were true. But it appears to be just more SLANDER coming from the craggy rock.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #549 11/27 - 11/28/2006
Post by: memphis on November 28, 2006, 11:54:41 AM
Morning monkeys! Just peeking in and I see everyone is still hard at work.

With all this focus on JVS and the Dutch, I think it might be a good time for someone to approach Deepak with a great deal. He might feel a little safer right now.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #549 11/27 - 11/28/2006
Post by: the big hammer on November 28, 2006, 12:02:47 PM
At The Sloot House ?

I recall statements indicating same and would welcome any confirmation/corroboration:

1.  ALE issued information to public seeking any witnesses who may have seen kalpoe outside of the sloot house between 1:30 - 1:40 AM on May 30, 2005.  I think this was in mid-August, 2005.  No follow up report was ever issued as to results, as I recall.

2.  I recall Joran indicating in one of his on-camera interviews that they "drove past" OR "briefly stopped" in front of his house in Noord after leaving C&C and enroute to lighthouse.

***************************************************

As most know, Beth early on repeatedly expressed her belief that Natalee had been at the house of sloot, at some point during her abduction.  She provided no "tangible" proof to support this belief, relying instead on intuition and sensate perception.

This perception may well have been buttressed, as Beth explained later, by the ambient and environmental sounds in the area immediately proximate to sloot home, sound she heard after she had been to the location.  She based this on the background noise associated with that voice mail message, the one they played for Charles Croes when they arrived immediately on the island.  She said that one of the background sounds she heard is the screeching on the neighbors pet monkey, Mica, kept in an outside cage/enclosure.

I do agree that all of the boys' stories (light house, beach, Holiday Inn) have been designed to pull the primary crime scene out of the frame...

.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #549 11/27 - 11/28/2006
Post by: Jacqueline on November 28, 2006, 12:11:53 PM
Quote from: "Anna"
Now I have a headache and am just plain angry.  If Janssen was present for that search, had a warrant for the entire compound in hand, why didn't she just order the cops to remove Witt or Paulus or King or anybody interfering with carrying out the warrant?  Now why is she telling about Carlos saying Joran was guilty?  Nothing good can come of that that I can see.  Is this some desperate bid to have the entire case thrown out of court now that deVries might uncover some of their tricks?

Why do monkeys think Joran had that sick photo made?  Wassup with that?  And to pay such a price for it, too.  It wasn't just a casual joke on his part to have that kind of investment in it.

.


I think it's his way of HA HA HA ....

Same as when OJ goes golfing, and is out and about..

They both know they got away with murder...

Too late to convict OJ....

Is there still hope with Joran?


Title: Lively Case Discussion #549 11/27 - 11/28/2006
Post by: blah on November 28, 2006, 12:14:27 PM
Quote from: "Buckeye"
The earring is gone.......... :shock:


maybe he is telling us he kept her earrings for a souvenier


Title: Re: More Van der Sloot Lies
Post by: blah on November 28, 2006, 12:23:19 PM
Quote from: "carpe noctem"
I was going back reading the case documents over the past few days...

I dug up the following Deepak ALE Statement of 6/29/2005

I would like to hear other people's opinions on it.

------------------


Deepak interview with police
6/29/2005

On your question what Joran's mom meant by telling us that we should stay away from the "Marriot Hotel", I can say the following. With this she meant that the police was monitoring that area and that we were already in trouble. So avoid the area and that it was best to head home.

---------------

I find it very strange that Anita singled out the Marriott as a  'HOT ZONE'
and for the boys to stay away due of cop presence. Had Joran already come up with LIE CHANGE #2 by this time?

Something about it doesn't sound riight to me.

Anita is already saying the boys are in trouble.  TROUBLE FOR
WHAT? Leaving Natalee at the beach. That is certainly no crime
if it hapened just the way DILBERT said it did.

How can she reconcile that? The Sporter is innocent
and his poop smells like friggin rose petals... but stay away
from the Marriott because you're in trouble?

SHE'S ALREADY SAYING they are in trouble.

Had the DROP AT MARRIOTT  been introduced at this time?

I don't think it was... I'll have to dig around in the file
archives to go over it again. I'd love to hear anbody's
thoughts on this. -J4N-


didnt Deepak have a key to the basement of the Marriot ?


Title: Re: More Van der Sloot Lies
Post by: blah on November 28, 2006, 12:24:52 PM
Quote from: "carpe noctem"
I was going back reading the case documents over the past few days...

I dug up the following Deepak ALE Statement of 6/29/2005

I would like to hear other people's opinions on it.

------------------


Deepak interview with police
6/29/2005

On your question what Joran's mom meant by telling us that we should stay away from the "Marriot Hotel", I can say the following. With this she meant that the police was monitoring that area and that we were already in trouble. So avoid the area and that it was best to head home.

---------------

I find it very strange that Anita singled out the Marriott as a  'HOT ZONE'
and for the boys to stay away due of cop presence. Had Joran already come up with LIE CHANGE #2 by this time?

Something about it doesn't sound riight to me.

Anita is already saying the boys are in trouble.  TROUBLE FOR
WHAT? Leaving Natalee at the beach. That is certainly no crime
if it hapened just the way DILBERT said it did.

How can she reconcile that? The Sporter is innocent
and his poop smells like friggin rose petals... but stay away
from the Marriott because you're in trouble?

SHE'S ALREADY SAYING they are in trouble.

Had the DROP AT MARRIOTT  been introduced at this time?

I don't think it was... I'll have to dig around in the file
archives to go over it again. I'd love to hear anbody's
thoughts on this. -J4N-



she told them to stay away from they because thats where the body was and she didnt want them to be seen anywhere near it??


Title: Lively Case Discussion #549 11/27 - 11/28/2006
Post by: Tylergal on November 28, 2006, 12:25:42 PM
Quote from: "Carnut"
Quote from: "Anna"
Witt may have even thought if he blocked the search from the main house, it would not become as known that he was staying there.  IF in fact he was.

That was just a rumor and not being there to see with our own eyes, we have no way to know if a true one or not.

.


Well, there sure were a bunch of aruban posters wailing that the entire sloot dump was searched thoroughly.


Oh, yes Miss Idaho and her band of merry churchgoers, and (but much to the chagrin of most posters here at the time), that was the reason I felt it necessary to out them and their amoral leader.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #549 11/27 - 11/28/2006
Post by: blah on November 28, 2006, 12:28:21 PM
Quote from: "klaasend"
Posted by Crioyo on the front page of SM:

Saw the whole show sunday…Pretty good..even if it was just a summary of what we already knew. It’s the first decent attempt to put it all on mainstream tv. The last time opsporing verzocht did it, they made it look as if joran & co were just witnesses rather than suspects. This time around it was good.

I didn’t know though that Joran had paid someone 200euro’s to photoshop pics of him and natalee to pretend as if they already knew eachother. They showed the email and the account hakers_rule@

and when peter asked paulus on the phone, paulus also said the ‘’we have more information but will bring it out when the time is right, that is when she is found or in such a case'’ speech. same thing joran said on 60 minutes was it?
etc etc…pretty good show and there seems to be a part 2 this week according to me…

will keep an eye out.



sounds like he is setting up the Kalpoes if the body is found, but will not make them go down for it unless she is found.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #549 11/27 - 11/28/2006
Post by: San on November 28, 2006, 12:31:33 PM
Quote from: "Anna"
Now I have a headache and am just plain angry.  If Janssen was present for that search, had a warrant for the entire compound in hand, why didn't she just order the cops to remove Witt or Paulus or King or anybody interfering with carrying out the warrant?  Now why is she telling about Carlos saying Joran was guilty?  Nothing good can come of that that I can see.  Is this some desperate bid to have the entire case thrown out of court now that deVries might uncover some of their tricks?

Why do monkeys think Joran had that sick photo made?  Wassup with that?  And to pay such a price for it, too.  It wasn't just a casual joke on his part to have that kind of investment in it.

Have to go work but this is just maddening.  I don't know how on earth Beth and Dave have kept their wits about them dealing with this.  I just cannot imagine knowing all this and that they are refusing to investigate, etc. and having to deal with them anyway because they are the only ones involved.   :evil:

I am trying to recall if we heard anything else about Paulus and the judges at the beginning.  One thing was that he played golf in Curacao with them.  Does anyone recall anything else?

I will be working and lurking. . . . . .

I agree Anna.  We have heard so many times Karin Janssen was in charge of the investigation.  She called the shots.

In the words of Art Wood "This was a professional coverup".  Who better than Karin Janssen to lead the charge.


Title: Re: King
Post by: Tylergal on November 28, 2006, 12:32:47 PM
Quote from: "San"
Quote from: "Tylergal"
Quote from: "IBE"
And it was King who changed his name after the Mathews case?

Where human rights were proofed to be violated and I think, evidence was changed or lost. I believe that Paulus van der Sloot also worked on that case with King.

Also, wasn't it King withwhom the Sloots stayed while Joran was in prison? using the excuse of staying away from the media at their home and the cementing of the pool area?

Correct me if I am wrong. Thanks

IBE


Yes, the Sloots stayed at Ben King's while Joran was in prison and there was suspicion that Joran was coming home at nights with Ben King and spending nights there instead of in Kia.  Also, Paulus is the one who helped Ben (Voc)King during the episode that involved Matthews, for which the United Nations (not that I love that organization) and Amnesty International as well as other organizations were scrutinizing Ben Voc(King) and possibly PVDS for their illegal and inhumane actions.  

One of the posters at RWV lived on the same street as Ben VocKing and verified that the Sloots were staying there.

This is why I believe Paulus is capable of murder along with Joran.  I always said that Paulus could have made the decision not to help a severely injured Natalee.  He makes me sick.

Also, De Vries said last night that the police wanted to search areas of the Van der Sloot property and they were not allowed.  Apparently one of the areas was the garden.  In Paulus' statement he said he was working in his garden.  What was Paulus hiding in the garden.  Could it have been Natalee's clothes, shoes or even Natalee depending who was helping him that day.  Or could it have been Joran's K-Swiss sneakers.  Either way they did not want those search dogs around the property.  Is the garden the Plain View we are talking about.


San, that "sweating" out in the garden when Beth & Greta "dropped by" has always made me believe that he was burying Natalee or some of her belongings when Beth dropped by.  He was too sweaty and very disturbed and that phone call seemed too important and why would he answer a phone call when he had a guest in the home unless it was very important.  I don't answer my phone when I have guests as my voice mail can pick it up.  Not unless I am expecting a very important phone call do I bother to answer it.  

His garden!  What garden?  If Natalee is buried there, there is now something beautiful in that "garden."  It's not any wonder he was sweating.  I think I know what he was doing.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #549 11/27 - 11/28/2006
Post by: nonesuche on November 28, 2006, 12:35:29 PM
I agree blah......Paulus has demonstrated throughout he will only do what he is forced to do, typical defense attorney mentality and total lack of conscience. When if ever, has Paulus shown one ounce of compassion or ethics for the loss of Natalee? not ever !

Tyler-

Isn't it remarkable to go back and re-visit some of the protestations made on the lively about how genuine Aruba's LE and Janssen were? In reviewing when RU posted that photo originally, I had to search back through files and screenshots of whole pages of posts I have saved to CD now........just downright amazing the trail of outright lies.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #549 11/27 - 11/28/2006
Post by: Tylergal on November 28, 2006, 12:35:40 PM
Quote from: "San"
I would like to know how does a judge visiting the home of two of the suspects have the power to overturn a search warrant.  Was this Judge Witt the one who originally approved the search warrant?  He was not on official duty when he was at the Sloots.  It wasn't like the police knocked on the door and said by the way Judge can you change the wording in the search warrant before we start.  He abused his power for a murderer.  He should be investigated and brought up on charges.


This judge sounds like some of the ones appointed during the 1990s that are letting rapists and pedophiles go here in our country.  Shakespeare was right about killing all the lawyers.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #549 11/27 - 11/28/2006
Post by: San on November 28, 2006, 12:37:21 PM
Quote from: "crazybabyborg"
The other thing in the same DeVries statement that caught me was Joran's admission that Natalee had been at his parent's home:

Peter: Well the search in the home address of the family Van der Sloot is very strange because the search warrant was made by Head Prosecutor Karin Janssen and contained an allowance to search the whole address Mon 19. But when the police was on the spot another high ranking employee of the Justice Office it was Mr. Bob Witt reduced the search warrant to only the room of Joran and that’s very strange. The police was extremely frustrated about this because they had some clues that something might have happened to Natalee elsewhere in the garden or in the house of the parents because Joran admits that he has been with Natalee and Deepak and Satish at the home of his parents.

That was news to me, but you can bet he had a reason for admitting it and later denying it. My guess is that it was his effort to cover any "tell-tell" forensic evidence in the house.

I heard this a year ago when Beth was on one of the shows and she stated this on a show that Joran tooked Natalee to his home and raped her.  I call it rape but the technical term from Aruba is sexual assualt.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #549 11/27 - 11/28/2006
Post by: memphis on November 28, 2006, 12:40:57 PM
Quote from: "nonesuche"
I agree blah......Paulus has demonstrated throughout he will only do what he is forced to do, typical defense attorney mentality and total lack of conscience. When if ever, has Paulus shown one ounce of compassion or ethics for the loss of Natalee? not ever !

Tyler-

Isn't it remarkable to go back and re-visit some of the protestations made on the lively about how genuine Aruba's LE and Janssen were? In reviewing when RU posted that photo originally, I had to search back through files and screenshots of whole pages of posts I have saved to CD now........just downright amazing the trail of outright lies.


None, Thank you for looking up the date of the photo posting. So, do you think that Joran got it from RU or from an RU poster?
I'm just trying to figure out what has Daniel so concerned about that photo.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #549 11/27 - 11/28/2006
Post by: blah on November 28, 2006, 12:42:56 PM
Quote from: "the big hammer"
Obstruction of Justice

Beth is correct -- both "right" and "correct."

j2k and Paulus are vulnerable to mumerous ancillary charges:

Obstruction (All 4 of them)

Perjury (k2 false witness statements)

Conspiracy to Commit Perjury (k2 witness/suspect and jvds suspect statements)

Contempt of Court (k2 false witness statements)

Where is the prosecution for these obvious crimes -- OBVIOUS CRIMES.
What kind of Public Prosecutor lets criminals walk the streets when OBVIOUS CRIMES have been committed?  What kind of Government permits this?

Who interprets and enforces the law on Aruba?

Anyone with a local connection and a few ben franklins in their pocket?  This is a disgrace...and it's all starting to bubble up...

.  
.


its the same place that allows suspects to change their statements on the fly while they also edit the statement of the missing girls mother, all to fit with the suspects lies.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #549 11/27 - 11/28/2006
Post by: Tylergal on November 28, 2006, 12:44:04 PM
Quote from: "klaasend"
Posted by Tjeerd at FOB:

The tape of the show concerning the cocaine goes as follows:

(Commenter) Joran and Natalee were attracted to each other. There was no or hardly no obstacle to go to his appartment.

Witnesses say Natalee was drinking very great amounts of alcohol. Two witnesses say she carried drugs with her (a shot of a PV shown  reads: (..) Natalee asked me if I would like to sniff some cocaine)


Which means, it did NOT come from the MB kids but from some other "witness", most likely bought and paid for by the VDS family or Renfro.


Chemaley connections with Miss Idaho and the transparent Anita keep surfacing.  Oh, Boeti, Boeti, Boeti.  Was Julia Renfro chasing that Van Loon guy so she could pay him to say all these things when she told us he was pursueing her.  See, that's another lie so many chose to believe here that I always knew was probably the reversal of the truth.  Take what BonDia told you and turn it 180 degrees and somewhere therein was the truth.  She and her church sisters, the little jealous handmaidens were enough to make me want to give them a vacation to aruba, One way.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #549 11/27 - 11/28/2006
Post by: Tylergal on November 28, 2006, 12:48:11 PM
Quote from: "SunFreak2"
Here is all the info I was able to gather on the Judges involved in this case and who did what each step of the way.  A lot of times in the news articles, they never mentioned the judges name.

I suspect it was either Judge Witt or Judge van der Brink who signed the original search warrant.  The search at the Slots was on  6-15-05.


JUDGES -

Rick Smid  – Reportedly a friend of PVDS who stayed at VDS home.  Judge who released J2K in September 2005.  Dutch judge in Curacao.  As a public prosecutor in the NL, participated in the Carribean Financial Task Force as expert on money laundering.


Dick van den Brink  - Curacao criminal judge, Judge of Instruction, 6-12-05 who extended custody of J2K.  Released Johns & Jones(?)


Luis de Lannoy  - President of the Common Court of Appeals of Justice of the Netherlands Antilles and Aruba.


Judge J.S. Kuiperdal  – JOI with Jones & Johns, extended custody


Bob Witt  – Dutch Judge ruled on 6-17-05 that Paulus van der  Sloot cannot visit Prime Suspect J. Sloot in jail, but that Joran’s Mother may do so (and she did on 6-18). Extended J2K  custody on 6-17-05, and OK’d the transfer to KIA.
(http://i67.photobucket.com/albums/h291/SunFreak2/JudgeWitt.jpg)


Ah, the transparency of the visits.  Anita relaying messages to her delicious sporter from her sweat-laden "judge" husband.  

Then the idea became big and bold and if we could just get someone in Arkansas (some dimwit) to relay messages and letters (someone whose brain is smaller than Steve Croes' brain), we could pretend Natalee was still alive and sending letters to Paulus begging for forgiveness, and now who would that be that we could use to be our medley relayer?  Ah, we will let Julia Renfro find someone for us.  She will do it.  She definitely has interests in seeing this ended.  Otherwise, we will turn her in if we fall.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #549 11/27 - 11/28/2006
Post by: nonesuche on November 28, 2006, 12:53:35 PM
Quote from: "memphis"


None, Thank you for looking up the date of the photo posting. So, do you think that Joran got it from RU or from an RU poster?
I'm just trying to figure out what has Daniel so concerned about that photo.


Memphis, I suspect that he did for I don't think that SM posted that photo until much later, if ever? I can't find it was ever posted at FOB either. I do know having an original digital file makes the process of photoshopping much more realistic too, the way facebook albums work is you simply download from that album. So the only way to obtain that photo in the best digital format was within facebook for I do not believe that MB student would have ever sent that photo to anyone related to Joran willingly.

I'm hopeful if Daniel has uncovered information of value that he will put that info in the hands of the proper authorities or even De Vries.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #549 11/27 - 11/28/2006
Post by: Tylergal on November 28, 2006, 12:55:36 PM
Quote from: "crazybabyborg"
The other thing in the same DeVries statement that caught me was Joran's admission that Natalee had been at his parent's home:

Peter: Well the search in the home address of the family Van der Sloot is very strange because the search warrant was made by Head Prosecutor Karin Janssen and contained an allowance to search the whole address Mon 19. But when the police was on the spot another high ranking employee of the Justice Office it was Mr. Bob Witt reduced the search warrant to only the room of Joran and that’s very strange. The police was extremely frustrated about this because they had some clues that something might have happened to Natalee elsewhere in the garden or in the house of the parents because Joran admits that he has been with Natalee and Deepak and Satish at the home of his parents.

That was news to me, but you can bet he had a reason for admitting it and later denying it. My guess is that it was his effort to cover any "tell-tell" forensic evidence in the house.


Absolutely and the fact that he was seen there by neighbors who went to ALE.  Don't tell me that all neighbors are blind. :wink:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #549 11/27 - 11/28/2006
Post by: nonesuche on November 28, 2006, 12:57:26 PM
Am I reading this all correctly now, that the mention of the cocaine reference was from one person having said Natalee asked if they would like a snort of cocaine? Has this been verified yet? If so, please let me know.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #549 11/27 - 11/28/2006
Post by: memphis on November 28, 2006, 12:58:33 PM
None, did you read any of what Daniel was posting?

I believe Daniel thinks that Joran having that photo is not good for the defense. That's putting it lightly.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #549 11/27 - 11/28/2006
Post by: San on November 28, 2006, 01:00:39 PM
Fox will be talking about what De Vries said on Greta after commercial.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #549 11/27 - 11/28/2006
Post by: memphis on November 28, 2006, 01:02:18 PM
Daniel's positngs about that picture are driving me crazy.  :lol:

I wish some smart mind would look at it. I really believe the implications are huge. I have Photoshop, but don't have enough skills or technical knowledge to understand where Daniel is coming from.

He seems to be very logical and is taking lots of flack for his postings.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #549 11/27 - 11/28/2006
Post by: San on November 28, 2006, 01:04:34 PM
Quote from: "memphis"
Daniel's positngs about that picture are driving me crazy.  :lol:

I wish some smart mind would look at it. I really believe the implications are huge. I have Photoshop, but don't have enough skills or technical knowledge to understand where Daniel is coming from.

He seems to be very logical and is taking lots of flack for his postings.

OK I'll take a look right now :lol:  :roll:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #549 11/27 - 11/28/2006
Post by: memphis on November 28, 2006, 01:05:24 PM
Quote from: "San"
Quote from: "memphis"
Daniel's positngs about that picture are driving me crazy.  :lol:

I wish some smart mind would look at it. I really believe the implications are huge. I have Photoshop, but don't have enough skills or technical knowledge to understand where Daniel is coming from.

He seems to be very logical and is taking lots of flack for his postings.

OK I'll take a look right now :lol:  :roll:


Great!  :wink:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #549 11/27 - 11/28/2006
Post by: San on November 28, 2006, 01:06:22 PM
Quote from: "nonesuche"
Am I reading this all correctly now, that the mention of the cocaine reference was from one person having said Natalee asked if they would like a snort of cocaine? Has this been verified yet? If so, please let me know.

How can they verify something that isn't true.  Those idiots in Aruba are still trying to smear her name.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #549 11/27 - 11/28/2006
Post by: nonesuche on November 28, 2006, 01:07:41 PM
Memphis-

I have been reviewing his postings also, we don't have the original file De Vries does either, so as much as we'd like to review this in detail without what De Vries has - I fear we cannot.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #549 11/27 - 11/28/2006
Post by: nonesuche on November 28, 2006, 01:08:27 PM
Quote from: "San"
Quote from: "nonesuche"
Am I reading this all correctly now, that the mention of the cocaine reference was from one person having said Natalee asked if they would like a snort of cocaine? Has this been verified yet? If so, please let me know.

How can they verify something that isn't true.  Those idiots in Aruba are still trying to smear her name.


I guess I was hoping a translation of De Vries show could give us greater validation, I'm sorry for I may have asked a stupid question.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #549 11/27 - 11/28/2006
Post by: Anna on November 28, 2006, 01:09:51 PM
Quote from: "nonesuche"
Quote from: "memphis"


None, Thank you for looking up the date of the photo posting. So, do you think that Joran got it from RU or from an RU poster?
I'm just trying to figure out what has Daniel so concerned about that photo.


Memphis, I suspect that he did for I don't think that SM posted that photo until much later, if ever? I can't find it was ever posted at FOB either. I do know having an original digital file makes the process of photoshopping much more realistic too, the way facebook albums work is you simply download from that album. So the only way to obtain that photo in the best digital format was within facebook for I do not believe that MB student would have ever sent that photo to anyone related to Joran willingly.

I'm hopeful if Daniel has uncovered information of value that he will put that info in the hands of the proper authorities or even De Vries.



None,
Supposedly, there is a poster from MB who supplies RU with all the photos, etc. inside information about MB and the high school, etc.  I want to say his name was Bill but am not sure about that and can't remember the name under which he posted but he is the one who has given them the bulk of their MB photos.  Even the one of the MB kids supposedly at spring break which really could have been anything at all.

.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #549 11/27 - 11/28/2006
Post by: nonesuche on November 28, 2006, 01:11:45 PM
well I hope Bill or whoever he is, gets tangled up in this as well.....!


Title: Lively Case Discussion #549 11/27 - 11/28/2006
Post by: memphis on November 28, 2006, 01:12:08 PM
Quote from: "nonesuche"
Memphis-

I have been reviewing his postings also, we don't have the original file De Vries does either, so as much as we'd like to review this in detail without what De Vries has - I fear we cannot.


To clarify, I don't think the photoshopping part is the big deal. I think that Daniel's logic has lead him to his conclusion. What did he see/realize, etc.? That's what I'm wondering.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #549 11/27 - 11/28/2006
Post by: shadow on November 28, 2006, 01:12:22 PM
Quote from: "memphis"
Daniel's positngs about that picture are driving me crazy.  :lol:

I wish some smart mind would look at it. I really believe the implications are huge. I have Photoshop, but don't have enough skills or technical knowledge to understand where Daniel is coming from.

He seems to be very logical and is taking lots of flack for his postings.


Afternoon Monkeys!
Memphis: Where are Daniel's posts regarding the photo?? I'd like t see them.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #549 11/27 - 11/28/2006
Post by: nonesuche on November 28, 2006, 01:13:08 PM
Quote from: "memphis"
Quote from: "nonesuche"
Memphis-

I have been reviewing his postings also, we don't have the original file De Vries does either, so as much as we'd like to review this in detail without what De Vries has - I fear we cannot.


To clarify, I don't think the photoshopping part is the big deal. I think that Daniel's logic has lead him to his conclusion. What did he see/realize, etc.? That's what I'm wondering.


I know Memphis, I don't have any answers but I'm intrigued just as you are.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #549 11/27 - 11/28/2006
Post by: San on November 28, 2006, 01:15:22 PM
Joe Tacopina is on Fox.  He said De Vries is a materialist and capitalist and is tryinbg to make money.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #549 11/27 - 11/28/2006
Post by: crazybabyborg on November 28, 2006, 01:15:41 PM
TACKY ALERT! ON FOX NOW


Title: Lively Case Discussion #549 11/27 - 11/28/2006
Post by: memphis on November 28, 2006, 01:15:46 PM
Quote from: "nonesuche"
Quote from: "memphis"
Quote from: "nonesuche"
Memphis-

I have been reviewing his postings also, we don't have the original file De Vries does either, so as much as we'd like to review this in detail without what De Vries has - I fear we cannot.


To clarify, I don't think the photoshopping part is the big deal. I think that Daniel's logic has lead him to his conclusion. What did he see/realize, etc.? That's what I'm wondering.


I know Memphis, I don't have any answers but I'm intrigued just as you are.


Thanks! Just glad to know someone else is paying attention.  :lol:

Shadow, he posts at FOB. Let me get more info. I'm not very good at this.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #549 11/27 - 11/28/2006
Post by: shadow on November 28, 2006, 01:17:26 PM
Quote from: "memphis"
Quote from: "nonesuche"
Quote from: "memphis"
Quote from: "nonesuche"
Memphis-

I have been reviewing his postings also, we don't have the original file De Vries does either, so as much as we'd like to review this in detail without what De Vries has - I fear we cannot.


To clarify, I don't think the photoshopping part is the big deal. I think that Daniel's logic has lead him to his conclusion. What did he see/realize, etc.? That's what I'm wondering.


I know Memphis, I don't have any answers but I'm intrigued just as you are.


Thanks! Just glad to know someone else is paying attention.  :lol:

Shadow, he posts at FOB. Let me get more info. I'm not very good at this.


Thanks Memphis . . . me either! :)


Title: Lively Case Discussion #549 11/27 - 11/28/2006
Post by: nonesuche on November 28, 2006, 01:17:49 PM
San put these on Joe (http://i86.photobucket.com/albums/k101/daisysistah/GIFS/smilies/pinkhandcuffsf.gif)

 :lol:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #549 11/27 - 11/28/2006
Post by: crazybabyborg on November 28, 2006, 01:17:58 PM
Search Warrant:
Tacky: Court asked that Joran's room be searched and it was


Well, so much for the rumours that the whole place was searched. Even Tacky didn't assert that it was.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #549 11/27 - 11/28/2006
Post by: San on November 28, 2006, 01:18:17 PM
Joe Tacopina is rambling on and on.

JOE TACOPINA IS A POS.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #549 11/27 - 11/28/2006
Post by: crazybabyborg on November 28, 2006, 01:19:05 PM
Quote from: "San"
Joe Tacopina is rambling on and on.

JOE TACOPINA IS A POS.


That just won't flush!


Title: Lively Case Discussion #549 11/27 - 11/28/2006
Post by: memphis on November 28, 2006, 01:20:07 PM
Shadow ~

-FOB
-Natalee Holloway
-The Peter de Vries show reports
-Daniel starts posting around page 10


Title: Lively Case Discussion #549 11/27 - 11/28/2006
Post by: nonesuche on November 28, 2006, 01:20:26 PM
well now at least we know Joe T is still on the payroll, but who is paying him?


Title: Lively Case Discussion #549 11/27 - 11/28/2006
Post by: Red on November 28, 2006, 01:20:32 PM
So Joe Taco goes to Rome, Italy and the Pope heads off to Turkey ...

Hey Joe ... think its a sign, if you are looking for absolution for your involvement in the case, doesn't sound like the Pontiff wants to hear it.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #549 11/27 - 11/28/2006
Post by: memphis on November 28, 2006, 01:21:43 PM
Ahhh....we haven't heard from Taco in awhile. I thought he was off the case.

Bet he got a desperate phone call from Aruba yesterday.  :lol:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #549 11/27 - 11/28/2006
Post by: crazybabyborg on November 28, 2006, 01:21:59 PM
Quote from: "Red"
So Joe Taco goes to Rome, Italy and the Pope heads off to Turkey ...

Hey Joe ... think its a sign, if you are looking for absolution for your involvement in the case, doesn't sound like the Pontiff wants to hear it.


GOOD ONE!  :lol:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #549 11/27 - 11/28/2006
Post by: memphis on November 28, 2006, 01:23:00 PM
Shadow, do you need more?


Title: Lively Case Discussion #549 11/27 - 11/28/2006
Post by: shadow on November 28, 2006, 01:23:10 PM
Quote from: "San"
Joe Tacopina is on Fox.  He said De Vries is a materialist and capitalist and is tryinbg to make money.


Would that not be the exact definition of Joe Taco??? Funny . . . sounds so much like "I know you are but what am I" IMO. (really sad) Tell your client to start treading cause the water is rising!


Title: Lively Case Discussion #549 11/27 - 11/28/2006
Post by: Red on November 28, 2006, 01:23:14 PM
Quote from: "crazybabyborg"
Search Warrant:
Tacky: Court asked that Joran's room be searched and it was


Well, so much for the rumours that the whole place was searched. Even Tacky didn't assert that it was.


Funny, I can remember him saying that the entire VDS premise was searched.

Guess that was just a convenient story at the time.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #549 11/27 - 11/28/2006
Post by: Tylergal on November 28, 2006, 01:24:24 PM
Quote from: "sharon"
Quote from: "Shizaru"
Quote from: "klaasend"
Posted by Tjeerd at FOB:

The tape of the show concerning the cocaine goes as follows:

(Commenter) Joran and Natalee were attracted to each other. There was no or hardly no obstacle to go to his appartment.

Witnesses say Natalee was drinking very great amounts of alcohol. Two witnesses say she carried drugs with her (a shot of a PV shown  reads: (..) Natalee asked me if I would like to sniff some cocaine)


Which means, it did NOT come from the MB kids but from some other "witness", most likely bought and paid for by the VDS family or Renfro.



Theoretically possible it could be a statement taken from one of the MB kids interviewed in January, and later translated into Dutch. But more likely is from someone in Aruba.



Viet Vet made an interesting FP post the other day.

He reminded us that Natalee didn't even have that kind of money with her on the trip to be able to buy cocaine.

(Unless in Aruba the 'all inclusive' in Aruba means more than we thought.)

Again -- it doesn't matter to me if it were true. But it appears to be just more SLANDER coming from the craggy rock.


Viet Vet is a very, very trustworthy source.  I would say perhaps Boeti or Van Loon made these PVs.  Who bought the boat and was this person using that purchase as a catalyst to get false testimony from an unreliable witness (at best).


Title: Lively Case Discussion #549 11/27 - 11/28/2006
Post by: Peaches on November 28, 2006, 01:24:40 PM
Quote from: "San"
Joe Tacopina is on Fox.  He said De Vries is a materialist and capitalist and is tryinbg to make money.


And I say it takes one to know one.


Title: Re: More Van der Sloot Lies
Post by: Tylergal on November 28, 2006, 01:26:01 PM
Quote from: "blah"
Quote from: "carpe noctem"
I was going back reading the case documents over the past few days...

I dug up the following Deepak ALE Statement of 6/29/2005

I would like to hear other people's opinions on it.

------------------


Deepak interview with police
6/29/2005

On your question what Joran's mom meant by telling us that we should stay away from the "Marriot Hotel", I can say the following. With this she meant that the police was monitoring that area and that we were already in trouble. So avoid the area and that it was best to head home.

---------------

I find it very strange that Anita singled out the Marriott as a  'HOT ZONE'
and for the boys to stay away due of cop presence. Had Joran already come up with LIE CHANGE #2 by this time?

Something about it doesn't sound riight to me.

Anita is already saying the boys are in trouble.  TROUBLE FOR
WHAT? Leaving Natalee at the beach. That is certainly no crime
if it hapened just the way DILBERT said it did.

How can she reconcile that? The Sporter is innocent
and his poop smells like friggin rose petals... but stay away
from the Marriott because you're in trouble?

SHE'S ALREADY SAYING they are in trouble.

Had the DROP AT MARRIOTT  been introduced at this time?

I don't think it was... I'll have to dig around in the file
archives to go over it again. I'd love to hear anbody's
thoughts on this. -J4N-


didnt Deepak have a key to the basement of the Marriot ?


I always wondered why Nadira was fired.  I do not think it had anything to do with padding guest checks.  There is more to her being fired and Steve Croes being fired than has met the witness statements.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #549 11/27 - 11/28/2006
Post by: Tylergal on November 28, 2006, 01:27:50 PM
Quote from: "nonesuche"
I agree blah......Paulus has demonstrated throughout he will only do what he is forced to do, typical defense attorney mentality and total lack of conscience. When if ever, has Paulus shown one ounce of compassion or ethics for the loss of Natalee? not ever !

Tyler-

Isn't it remarkable to go back and re-visit some of the protestations made on the lively about how genuine Aruba's LE and Janssen were? In reviewing when RU posted that photo originally, I had to search back through files and screenshots of whole pages of posts I have saved to CD now........just downright amazing the trail of outright lies.


I am so glad that you kept that.  Hooray for you!  I knew you were organized and did not let a fly get by you.  Yes, these refugees were Anita's and Julia's merry band of evil doers.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #549 11/27 - 11/28/2006
Post by: Red on November 28, 2006, 01:27:55 PM
Quote from: "shadow"
Quote from: "San"
Joe Tacopina is on Fox.  He said De Vries is a materialist and capitalist and is tryinbg to make money.


Would that not be the exact definition of Joe Taco??? Funny . . . sounds so much like "I know you are but what am I" IMO. (really sad) Tell your client to start treading cause the water is rising!


Materialist & a capitalist coming from a NYC lawyer that charges $500 an hr ... now that is priceless.

Because we all know Joe T said he was doing this case pro-bono in the beginning and ah, eh, um ... never did.

Joe T ... the benevolent  :wink:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #549 11/27 - 11/28/2006
Post by: shadow on November 28, 2006, 01:28:05 PM
Quote from: "memphis"
Shadow, do you need more?


Thanks Memphis! I should be able to find them with this info . . .  but may have to wait until I am home if I can't access the site from here. I haven't tried yet but am about to.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #549 11/27 - 11/28/2006
Post by: msmarple on November 28, 2006, 01:30:26 PM
Quick, can someone direct me, or give me, the post last week - I think it was something JR was up to - re. how badly Americans behave on Aruba?

Thanks.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #549 11/27 - 11/28/2006
Post by: Tylergal on November 28, 2006, 01:31:39 PM
Quote from: "San"
Joe Tacopina is on Fox.  He said De Vries is a materialist and capitalist and is tryinbg to make money.


Oh, that media/criminal whore should know.  He has become a multimillionaire based on his vocal support of criminals.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #549 11/27 - 11/28/2006
Post by: shadow on November 28, 2006, 01:33:09 PM
Quote from: "Red"
Quote from: "shadow"
Quote from: "San"
Joe Tacopina is on Fox.  He said De Vries is a materialist and capitalist and is tryinbg to make money.


Would that not be the exact definition of Joe Taco??? Funny . . . sounds so much like "I know you are but what am I" IMO. (really sad) Tell your client to start treading cause the water is rising!


Materialist & a capitalist coming from a NYC lawyer that charges $500 an hr ... now that is priceless.

Because we all know Joe T said he was doing this case pro-bono in the beginning and ah, eh, um ... never did.

Joe T ... the benevolent  :wink:


Exactly!  :lol:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #549 11/27 - 11/28/2006
Post by: Tylergal on November 28, 2006, 01:33:15 PM
Quote from: "nonesuche"
well now at least we know Joe T is still on the payroll, but who is paying him?


Check the connections of any newspaper that might have a conflict of interest here and oppose Jossy.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #549 11/27 - 11/28/2006
Post by: 2NJSons_Mom on November 28, 2006, 01:36:48 PM
Quote from: "msmarple"
Quick, can someone direct me, or give me, the post last week - I think it was something JR was up to - re. how badly Americans behave on Aruba?

Thanks.


I think you are referring to the article Leslie posted, with pictures at CnC...it's on this page, but I'm not sure if it was fully transcribed...that is if it's the one you are looking for:

http://www.scaredmonkeys.net/viewtopic.php?t=566&postdays=0&postorder=asc&highlight=mericano&start=640


Title: Lively Case Discussion #549 11/27 - 11/28/2006
Post by: Tylergal on November 28, 2006, 01:36:50 PM
What about a bridal magazine that might employ young men and women.  Who owns that magazine, and was this magazine a front for something else.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #549 11/27 - 11/28/2006
Post by: msmarple on November 28, 2006, 01:41:21 PM
2NJSons_Mom - Thanks, that was exactly what I needed.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #549 11/27 - 11/28/2006
Post by: Peaches on November 28, 2006, 01:43:10 PM
Well, for some real fun in the afternoon, you have to read thru the FOB posting about "big trouble, follow the monkeys".  

Talk about some folks having their knickers in a twist!    And poor Daniel trying to be the voice of reason and sanity.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #549 11/27 - 11/28/2006
Post by: Red on November 28, 2006, 01:47:50 PM
I wonder if Joe Tacopina would think that it was ok just to check one room in the house of Daryl Littlejohn in the Imette St. Guillen murder?

What say you Joe?

Think you would allow such a search? Think you wouldn't be crying on every cable show that "this is an outrage"?

Of course you would and you would be correct.

Too bad you are so slanted for only that who pays you rather than looking at a bigger picture.

Who has ever heard of a missing persons or murder case where a search warrant does not allow the property and all out buildings?

Like in the case of murdered Teresa Halback ... search warrant for the entire property of the salvage yard. If it was not, valuable evidence would have never have been found or admissible.

Funny how Joe says the entire island of Aruba was searched and every sand ... yet not the VDS residence ...

That does not smell too much. Joe you best do a couple hundred thousand rosaries and hail Mary's while in Rome as well and hope lightening does not strike.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #549 11/27 - 11/28/2006
Post by: Ono on November 28, 2006, 01:50:18 PM
Quote from: "klaasend"
Posted by Tjeerd at FOB:

The tape of the show concerning the cocaine goes as follows:

(Commenter) Joran and Natalee were attracted to each other. There was no or hardly no obstacle to go to his appartment.

Witnesses say Natalee was drinking very great amounts of alcohol. Two witnesses say she carried drugs with her (a shot of a PV shown  reads: (..) Natalee asked me if I would like to sniff some cocaine)


Which means, it did NOT come from the MB kids but from some other "witness", most likely bought and paid for by the VDS family or Renfro.


No doubt. And it's such a pile of doo doo I can smell it all the way through my computer;  And also, isn't true that ONLY our own FBI have taken statements from our MB kids???? ALE HAS NOT TAKEN STATEMENTS FROM THE MOUNTAIN BROOK STUDENTS.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #549 11/27 - 11/28/2006
Post by: Ono on November 28, 2006, 01:52:33 PM
Quote from: "Ono"
Quote from: "klaasend"
Posted by Tjeerd at FOB:

The tape of the show concerning the cocaine goes as follows:

(Commenter) Joran and Natalee were attracted to each other. There was no or hardly no obstacle to go to his appartment.

Witnesses say Natalee was drinking very great amounts of alcohol. Two witnesses say she carried drugs with her (a shot of a PV shown  reads: (..) Natalee asked me if I would like to sniff some cocaine)


Which means, it did NOT come from the MB kids but from some other "witness", most likely bought and paid for by the VDS family or Renfro.


No doubt. And it's such a pile of doo doo I can smell it all the way through my computer;  And also, isn't true that ONLY our own FBI have taken statements from our MB kids???? ALE HAS NOT TAKEN STATEMENTS FROM THE MOUNTAIN BROOK STUDENTS.


Or did they when they traveled to the states?? And only with our FBI present???  Trying to remember here..


Title: Lively Case Discussion #549 11/27 - 11/28/2006
Post by: nonesuche on November 28, 2006, 01:56:30 PM
The ALE came to Birmingham, they also traveled to Tuscaloosa, and took statements from the MB kids with an FBI representative present.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #549 11/27 - 11/28/2006
Post by: carpe noctem on November 28, 2006, 01:57:35 PM
Quote from: "San"
Joe Tacopina is on Fox.  He said De Vries is a materialist and capitalist and is tryinbg to make money.


"A Fox Smells His Own Hole First, Joseph."

Joey Pacotina - THE FLATULENT!

I wish that garden
weasel would go curl up
somewhere...

 and bite the
proverbial BIG 1.

LOSER.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #549 11/27 - 11/28/2006
Post by: Ono on November 28, 2006, 02:02:13 PM
Quote from: "carpe noctem"
Quote from: "klaasend"
Note to JR Dutch Attorney at FOB

In case you weren't aware, when we refer to JR we are talking about Julia Renfro, not you.  Actually, we don't give you a second thought



(http://i37.photobucket.com/albums/e82/klaasend2/JuliaWitch-1.gif)


Hubba Hubba Ding Ding!!! Da Renfrrrrro

She's a hottie. (nottie)

I wonder if  that broom can fly straight through...

Or does she have to switch brooms in Atlanta. :lol:

J4N everybody!


 :lol:  :lol:  :lol:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #549 11/27 - 11/28/2006
Post by: the big hammer on November 28, 2006, 02:08:41 PM
L'l Joey & Fauxtography

The esquire doesn't address the point.

Why?

For sure, one of his conditions for appearing is to not have to respond to questions concerning his client's paying a photoshop expert $250 - $300 to digitally re-create pictures which show him (joran) and Natalee together.

If you're L'il Joey, you don't want to start talking about this subject -- No Way!

And that's because this represents the actions of a sociopath.  

American audiences do not have be reminded of this with concrete evidence of same.  Not to mention how it makes the goon child appear obsessed and tortured, increasing perceptual likelihood that his client is a sadistic rapist and murderer.

Let's not talk about this  -- right, Joey?

.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #549 11/27 - 11/28/2006
Post by: Tylergal on November 28, 2006, 02:09:35 PM
Quote from: "Anna"
Quote from: "nonesuche"
Quote from: "memphis"


None, Thank you for looking up the date of the photo posting. So, do you think that Joran got it from RU or from an RU poster?
I'm just trying to figure out what has Daniel so concerned about that photo.


Memphis, I suspect that he did for I don't think that SM posted that photo until much later, if ever? I can't find it was ever posted at FOB either. I do know having an original digital file makes the process of photoshopping much more realistic too, the way facebook albums work is you simply download from that album. So the only way to obtain that photo in the best digital format was within facebook for I do not believe that MB student would have ever sent that photo to anyone related to Joran willingly.

I'm hopeful if Daniel has uncovered information of value that he will put that info in the hands of the proper authorities or even De Vries.



None,
Supposedly, there is a poster from MB who supplies RU with all the photos, etc. inside information about MB and the high school, etc.  I want to say his name was Bill but am not sure about that and can't remember the name under which he posted but he is the one who has given them the bulk of their MB photos.  Even the one of the MB kids supposedly at spring break which really could have been anything at all.

.


Anna, is that the gay hairdresser who pretended to befriend some of the MB people and took things from their homes related to the case?  Trying to remember.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #549 11/27 - 11/28/2006
Post by: bleachedblack on November 28, 2006, 02:10:28 PM
Quote from: "SunFreak2"
Here is all the info I was able to gather on the Judges involved in this case and who did what each step of the way.  A lot of times in the news articles, they never mentioned the judges name.

I suspect it was either Judge Witt or Judge van der Brink who signed the original search warrant.  The search at the Slots was on  6-15-05.


JUDGES -

Rick Smid  – Reportedly a friend of PVDS who stayed at VDS home.  Judge who released J2K in September 2005.  Dutch judge in Curacao.  As a public prosecutor in the NL, participated in the Carribean Financial Task Force as expert on money laundering.


Dick van den Brink  - Curacao criminal judge, Judge of Instruction, 6-12-05 who extended custody of J2K.  Released Johns & Jones(?)


Luis de Lannoy  - President of the Common Court of Appeals of Justice of the Netherlands Antilles and Aruba.


Judge J.S. Kuiperdal  – JOI with Jones & Johns, extended custody


Bob Witt  – Dutch Judge ruled on 6-17-05 that Paulus van der  Sloot cannot visit Prime Suspect J. Sloot in jail, but that Joran’s Mother may do so (and she did on 6-18). Extended J2K  custody on 6-17-05, and OK’d the transfer to KIA.
(http://i67.photobucket.com/albums/h291/SunFreak2/JudgeWitt.jpg)


Sunfreak2 thanks for the info this has helped me keep my Witt's and Smid's straight.

 :wink:


Title: Re: King
Post by: Ono on November 28, 2006, 02:15:42 PM
Quote from: "Tylergal"
Quote from: "San"
Quote from: "Tylergal"
Quote from: "IBE"
And it was King who changed his name after the Mathews case?

Where human rights were proofed to be violated and I think, evidence was changed or lost. I believe that Paulus van der Sloot also worked on that case with King.

Also, wasn't it King withwhom the Sloots stayed while Joran was in prison? using the excuse of staying away from the media at their home and the cementing of the pool area?

Correct me if I am wrong. Thanks

IBE


Yes, the Sloots stayed at Ben King's while Joran was in prison and there was suspicion that Joran was coming home at nights with Ben King and spending nights there instead of in Kia.  Also, Paulus is the one who helped Ben (Voc)King during the episode that involved Matthews, for which the United Nations (not that I love that organization) and Amnesty International as well as other organizations were scrutinizing Ben Voc(King) and possibly PVDS for their illegal and inhumane actions.  

One of the posters at RWV lived on the same street as Ben VocKing and verified that the Sloots were staying there.

This is why I believe Paulus is capable of murder along with Joran.  I always said that Paulus could have made the decision not to help a severely injured Natalee.  He makes me sick.

Also, De Vries said last night that the police wanted to search areas of the Van der Sloot property and they were not allowed.  Apparently one of the areas was the garden.  In Paulus' statement he said he was working in his garden.  What was Paulus hiding in the garden.  Could it have been Natalee's clothes, shoes or even Natalee depending who was helping him that day.  Or could it have been Joran's K-Swiss sneakers.  Either way they did not want those search dogs around the property.  Is the garden the Plain View we are talking about.


San, that "sweating" out in the garden when Beth & Greta "dropped by" has always made me believe that he was burying Natalee or some of her belongings when Beth dropped by.  He was too sweaty and very disturbed and that phone call seemed too important and why would he answer a phone call when he had a guest in the home unless it was very important.  I don't answer my phone when I have guests as my voice mail can pick it up.  Not unless I am expecting a very important phone call do I bother to answer it.  

His garden!  What garden?  If Natalee is buried there, there is now something beautiful in that "garden."  It's not any wonder he was sweating.  I think I know what he was doing.


And don't forget, Beth & Greta caught him hiding inside some bushes up close to his home and it took a long time to coax him out. He must have been double-checking, etc. ???


Title: Lively Case Discussion #549 11/27 - 11/28/2006
Post by: Ono on November 28, 2006, 02:19:09 PM
Quote from: "San"
Joe Tacopina is on Fox.  He said De Vries is a materialist and capitalist and is tryinbg to make money.


Oh brother.. :roll: Him again ?? deVries is hitting some nerves!  :D


Title: Lively Case Discussion #549 11/27 - 11/28/2006
Post by: WidgetTheMidget on November 28, 2006, 02:19:23 PM
Quote from: "crazybabyborg"
OK................once and for all I'm going to settle the "Klaas gender controversy". Forgive me, Klaas, but just this once I'm posting this pic from your private album. It's time for a full view for all to see. It leaves no doubt...........

(http://i25.photobucket.com/albums/c100/crazybabyborgs/sexymonkey.jpg)

 :lol:


Hey Klaas ...........

Watcha Doin Tonight ..............

 8)


Title: Lively Case Discussion #549 11/27 - 11/28/2006
Post by: WidgetTheMidget on November 28, 2006, 02:21:17 PM
ITS TOTALLY A DUTCH THING ..............................

 :roll:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #549 11/27 - 11/28/2006
Post by: bleachedblack on November 28, 2006, 02:21:35 PM
Quote from: "crazybabyborg"
Morning!
If KJ was at the house, she's got bigger problems than being blonde. She's part of the corruption. Last night, DeVries said,
Peter: Well the search in the home address of the family Van der Sloot is very strange because the search warrant was made by Head Prosecutor Karin Janssen and contained an allowance to search the whole address Mon 19. But when the police was on the spot another high ranking employee of the Justice Office it was Mr. Bob Witt reduced the search warrant to only the room of Joran and that’s very strange. The police was extremely frustrated about this because they had some clues that something might have happened to Natalee elsewhere in the garden or in the house of the parents because Joran admits that he has been with Natalee and Deepak and Satish at the home of his parents.
I believe the reference to the warrant being made by KJ was probably meant as KJ requested the warrant with specific inclusions and was  granted by a judge the warrant as she wrote it. If that decision was summarily altered by her superior "on the scene" and she didn't kick her way to the news media crowded around the entrance, she is culpable. Worse case scernario is she helped coordinate the obstruction and did indeed help orchestrate Paulus's "lawyer" status to watch Carlos.


+++++++++++++++++++++++++++

CBB when I read your reasoning on what might have happened at the scene and time the Sloot house was searched....with KJ likely there and likely with a search warrant.....and then to have had it over-ridden by a Judge on the scene, possibly a different judge? and she didn't or couldn't do anything about it?  Wonder if it was after this that she took the 2 week powder to the Netherlands? Did she go back carrying evidence as a guise.....but instead saying "They're not playing fair down there!"


Title: Lively Case Discussion #549 11/27 - 11/28/2006
Post by: Tylergal on November 28, 2006, 02:22:56 PM
Paulus finally came out of the bushes, and I think there was a reason he invited Beth & Greta in.  He did not want them lurking outside, lest they find freshly dug dirt or plants.  One would be smart to check and see where the garden is the greenest.  There might be some clues there.  Ever notice how we go to old cemetaries to look for old garden roses that are still alive and doing well, despite the lack of care.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #549 11/27 - 11/28/2006
Post by: Ono on November 28, 2006, 02:23:28 PM
Quote from: "Tylergal"
What about a bridal magazine that might employ young men and women.  Who owns that magazine, and was this magazine a front for something else.


That entire island is a front for something else.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #549 11/27 - 11/28/2006
Post by: Ono on November 28, 2006, 02:25:38 PM
Quote from: "nonesuche"
The ALE came to Birmingham, they also traveled to Tuscaloosa, and took statements from the MB kids with an FBI representative present.


Thanks..


Title: Lively Case Discussion #549 11/27 - 11/28/2006
Post by: WidgetTheMidget on November 28, 2006, 02:29:09 PM
PEOPLE THAT SHOULD BE JACK BAUERED ...........

JORAN HIJO DE PUTA

PAULUS CHINGA SU MADRE

ANITA LA GRAN PUTA DE ARUBA

KJ FISCAL DE MI CULO

AND ALL THE REST OF THE DUTCH IN THE WORLD ..........

 :roll:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #549 11/27 - 11/28/2006
Post by: WidgetTheMidget on November 28, 2006, 02:32:32 PM
GOOD DAY TO ALL MY MONKEY FRIENDS & MONKEY ENEMIES .........

THE WEATHER IS RAINING & THE TRACK IS SLOPPY ..............

 8)


Title: Lively Case Discussion #549 11/27 - 11/28/2006
Post by: nonesuche on November 28, 2006, 02:33:23 PM
Hi Widget  :D  great to see you !!!!!!!!

Klaas will be flattered I'm sure  :wink:

Hey I remembered a piece on the press page at Joe T's website, be sure to read the one of him as "King of Westport" back in Westport Magazine in 2002?

And he dares to call De Vries a capitalist? YIKES, hope he's not near any lightning anytime soon  :lol:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #549 11/27 - 11/28/2006
Post by: Ono on November 28, 2006, 02:35:19 PM
Quote from: "Tylergal"
Paulus finally came out of the bushes, and I think there was a reason he invited Beth & Greta in.  He did not want them lurking outside, lest they find freshly dug dirt or plants.  One would be smart to check and see where the garden is the greenest.  There might be some clues there.  Ever notice how we go to old cemetaries to look for old garden roses that are still alive and doing well, despite the lack of care.


Yes...he was frantically adament when he finally made his way out from those bushes and down to the gate, to shoo away those filming FOX TV cameras. I think those see-all TV cameras compelled him to ask Beth & Greta inside. He was caught with his pants down...(not literally).


Title: Lively Case Discussion #549 11/27 - 11/28/2006
Post by: nonesuche on November 28, 2006, 02:35:42 PM
Oops, memory didn't serve me well, it's "King of the Courtroom"

http://www.tacopinalaw.com/press.html

Joe T on the red carpet (http://i86.photobucket.com/albums/k101/daisysistah/GIFS/smilies/oscars.gif)

 :lol:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #549 11/27 - 11/28/2006
Post by: bleachedblack on November 28, 2006, 02:36:50 PM
Quote from: "WidgetTheMidget"
Quote from: "crazybabyborg"
OK................once and for all I'm going to settle the "Klaas gender controversy". Forgive me, Klaas, but just this once I'm posting this pic from your private album. It's time for a full view for all to see. It leaves no doubt...........

(http://i25.photobucket.com/albums/c100/crazybabyborgs/sexymonkey.jpg)

 :lol:


Hey Klaas ...........

Watcha Doin Tonight ..............

 8)


Klaas is that you? vavavooooom  what a Wooooman
I think......


Title: Lively Case Discussion #549 11/27 - 11/28/2006
Post by: Tylergal on November 28, 2006, 02:38:26 PM
Quote from: "Ono"
Quote from: "Tylergal"
Paulus finally came out of the bushes, and I think there was a reason he invited Beth & Greta in.  He did not want them lurking outside, lest they find freshly dug dirt or plants.  One would be smart to check and see where the garden is the greenest.  There might be some clues there.  Ever notice how we go to old cemetaries to look for old garden roses that are still alive and doing well, despite the lack of care.


Yes...he was frantically adament when he finally made his way out from those bushes and down to the gate, to shoo away those filming FOX TV cameras. I think those see-all TV cameras compelled him to ask Beth & Greta inside. He was caught with his pants down...(not literally).


Yes, there was definitely a method to his madness and it was not to be hospitable to "seeing eyes" of Greta & Beth, quite the contrary, to keep them close to his seeing eyes, so they would not be snooping around with their cameramen.  I wonder if any of Beth's camera personnel ever found anything and she would not allow it be made public.  Seems possible because they went back repeatedly to see the monkey and feed it.  She might be afraid of trespassing charges or fear of the VDS family being found out for what they are.  She has some political contacts, herself, that are downright scary.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #549 11/27 - 11/28/2006
Post by: Ono on November 28, 2006, 02:38:43 PM
Quote from: "bleachedblack"
Quote from: "WidgetTheMidget"
Quote from: "crazybabyborg"
OK................once and for all I'm going to settle the "Klaas gender controversy". Forgive me, Klaas, but just this once I'm posting this pic from your private album. It's time for a full view for all to see. It leaves no doubt...........

(http://i25.photobucket.com/albums/c100/crazybabyborgs/sexymonkey.jpg)

 :lol:


Hey Klaas ...........

Watcha Doin Tonight ..............

 8)


Klaas is that you? vavavooooom  what a Wooooman
I think......


 :lol: You two make a lovely couple.  :lol:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #549 11/27 - 11/28/2006
Post by: Ono on November 28, 2006, 02:44:43 PM
Quote from: "Tylergal"
Quote from: "Ono"
Quote from: "Tylergal"
Paulus finally came out of the bushes, and I think there was a reason he invited Beth & Greta in.  He did not want them lurking outside, lest they find freshly dug dirt or plants.  One would be smart to check and see where the garden is the greenest.  There might be some clues there.  Ever notice how we go to old cemetaries to look for old garden roses that are still alive and doing well, despite the lack of care.


Yes...he was frantically adament when he finally made his way out from those bushes and down to the gate, to shoo away those filming FOX TV cameras. I think those see-all TV cameras compelled him to ask Beth & Greta inside. He was caught with his pants down...(not literally).


Yes, there was definitely a method to his madness and it was not to be hospitable to "seeing eyes" of Greta & Beth, quite the contrary, to keep them close to his seeing eyes, so they would not be snooping around with their cameramen.  I wonder if any of Beth's camera personnel ever found anything and she would not allow it be made public.  Seems possible because they went back repeatedly to see the monkey and feed it.  She might be afraid of trespassing charges or fear of the VDS family being found out for what they are.  She has some political contacts, herself, that are downright scary.


I have no doubt that there is plenty Beth hasn't wisely made public yet; Yes, those pointed trips of Beth & Greta back to visit and feed Mica meant more than just supplying bananas to a neglected & lonely monkey....


Title: Lively Case Discussion #549 11/27 - 11/28/2006
Post by: Appeals on November 28, 2006, 02:47:46 PM
Quote from: Anna
Now I have a headache and am just plain angry.  If Janssen was present for that search, had a warrant for the entire compound in hand, why didn't she just order the cops to remove Witt or Paulus or King or anybody interfering with carrying out the warrant?  Now why is she telling about Carlos saying Joran was guilty?  Nothing good can come of that that I can see.  Is this some desperate bid to have the entire case thrown out of court now that deVries might uncover some of their tricks?

Why do monkeys think Joran had that sick photo made?  Wassup with that?  And to pay such a price for it, too.  It wasn't just a casual joke on his part to have that kind of investment in it.

Have to go work but this is just maddening.  I don't know how on earth Beth and Dave have kept their wits about them dealing with this.  I just cannot imagine knowing all this and that they are refusing to investigate, etc. and having to deal with them anyway because they are the only ones involved.   :evil:

I am trying to recall if we heard anything else about Paulus and the judges at the beginning.  One thing was that he played golf in Curacao with them.  Does anyone recall anything else?

I will be working and lurking. . . . . .

Quote


Okay, Anna has brought me out of hiding.  Hi everybody, nice to be able to drop in this morning.  Earning an income has taken me away for quite a while (sigh).

Some thoughts on questions posed by Anna and others in the last day or so:

1.  Could Carlos' visit to KJ have been an intentional play to breach the attorney client relationship so as to give a basis to defend his client? (Remember:  KJ is the one that fouled up the DNA test evidence in such a manner it could be thrown out)

2.  I think the "sick photo" was Joran's attempt to provide a possible book jacket.  Remember:  He was shopping around the idea of a book deal, per Nancy Grace, Feb 23, 2006.  The "deadline" mentioned in the email could have had to do with publishers he was talking to wanting him to provide some type of evidence for some ridiculous theory he was floating to them, such as he had known Natalee before she came to Aruba.  Or he could have just liked his dominant placement in relation to her).

3.  Carlos was removed as JVDS' attorney on 6/17/05.  Joran had been arrested on 6/9/05.  Carlos's meeting with KJ was shortly after JVDS was arrested according to DeVries.  KJ was in the position to engineer Carlos' removal as attorney using the "excuse" of his having tried to talk with the SG about the case.  I'm still trying to figure out how this fits together.

Okay, fading into background again, but before I do, must say to KLAAS, RED, and ALL YOU MONKEYS that keep hammering away at this...Awesome Job!  


Title: Lively Case Discussion #549 11/27 - 11/28/2006
Post by: robots on November 28, 2006, 03:10:26 PM
Quote from: "Ono"
Quote from: "San"
Joe Tacopina is on Fox.  He said De Vries is a materialist and capitalist and is tryinbg to make money.


Oh brother.. :roll: Him again ?? deVries is hitting some nerves!  :D




taco is a JACKASS 8)


Title: Lively Case Discussion #549 11/27 - 11/28/2006
Post by: Tylergal on November 28, 2006, 03:11:30 PM
I noticed on Gretawire, (I went there for the first time in months today), there were not many e-mails regards the Natalee Holloway case and her special guest, Mr. DeVries.  I suppose I should have sent her one myself.  I want someone who has more patience than I to write her and tell her the reason she got so little e-mail regarding the case was not due to a lack of interest in the case but a lack of interest in her program since she chose darkness over light when she chose to believe the sporter with whom it appeared she was having a little interaction with on TV. Hmmm.  Makes ne wonder what her fellow Scientologists thought of the ittle "body talk" between her and the delicious sporter.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #549 11/27 - 11/28/2006
Post by: thirdstrike on November 28, 2006, 03:25:23 PM
Hey everyone!!  Hope all is well...

I've been gone a LONG time, so forgive my lack of info.  Is there coverage on the case with Greta soon?


Title: Lively Case Discussion #549 11/27 - 11/28/2006
Post by: nonesuche on November 28, 2006, 03:37:11 PM
Hi Third-

Greta had Beth and De Vries on by phone last night, I think Jacq and San both posted a transcript on the lively?

Anna-
I don't think that photo came from Dale, I've done some emailing today with some who know him, he never had access internally to Facebook. I also find it very interesting that pausebreak at RU posted on Sunday exactly which home that photo was taken in? Moving ahead with more digging on this now.....


Title: Lively Case Discussion #549 11/27 - 11/28/2006
Post by: MuffyBee on November 28, 2006, 03:37:49 PM
Quote from: "thirdstrike"
Hey everyone!!  Hope all is well...

I've been gone a LONG time, so forgive my lack of info.  Is there coverage on the case with Greta soon?


Hello Third.  Yes, you have been gone a LONG time...Not sure about the coverage on the case with Greta.  I had subscribed to Gretawire, but have since unsubscribed.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #549 11/27 - 11/28/2006
Post by: Shizaru on November 28, 2006, 03:38:18 PM
The crime scene was NOT the VDS home.  That is highly inconsistent with the evidence (text messages, polis car tape) and logic (2K have no motive to lie about dropoff point, ect).  IMO.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #549 11/27 - 11/28/2006
Post by: MuffyBee on November 28, 2006, 03:39:59 PM
Quote from: "Shizaru"
The crime scene was NOT the VDS home.  That is highly inconsistent with the evidence (text messages, polis car tape) and logic (2K have no motive to lie about dropoff point, ect).  IMO.


If you think the crime scene wasn't the VDS home, do you think possibly there was evidence hidden there and that was why search of home not allowed?  Or was it not allowed to be searched to throw things off?


Title: Lively Case Discussion #549 11/27 - 11/28/2006
Post by: Tylergal on November 28, 2006, 03:41:31 PM
Quote from: "Shizaru"
The crime scene was NOT the VDS home.  That is highly inconsistent with the evidence (text messages, polis car tape) and logic (2K have no motive to lie about dropoff point, ect).  IMO.


Shizaru, even our FBI on Fox admitted these text messages and so forth were red herrings they used to keep the dog off the trail and FBI believed they were all sitting within 2 feet of one another while messaging back and forth.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #549 11/27 - 11/28/2006
Post by: Shizaru on November 28, 2006, 03:44:21 PM
Quote from: "MuffyBee"
Quote from: "Shizaru"
The crime scene was NOT the VDS home.  That is highly inconsistent with the evidence (text messages, polis car tape) and logic (2K have no motive to lie about dropoff point, ect).  IMO.


If you think the crime scene wasn't the VDS home, do you think possibly there was evidence hidden there and that was why search of home not allowed?  Or was it not allowed to be searched to throw things off?


I think PVDS didn't know for sure what happened and where, or what evidence might be found on his property, and just wasn't taking any chances.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #549 11/27 - 11/28/2006
Post by: Tylergal on November 28, 2006, 04:04:38 PM
Quote from: "Shizaru"
Quote from: "MuffyBee"
Quote from: "Shizaru"
The crime scene was NOT the VDS home.  That is highly inconsistent with the evidence (text messages, polis car tape) and logic (2K have no motive to lie about dropoff point, ect).  IMO.


If you think the crime scene wasn't the VDS home, do you think possibly there was evidence hidden there and that was why search of home not allowed?  Or was it not allowed to be searched to throw things off?


I think PVDS didn't know for sure what happened and where, or what evidence might be found on his property, and just wasn't taking any chances.


He would be wise to check with Anita first, before getting all flustered.  He and Anita both know but I think at this point, she has handled everything and has not told him where everything is in case he and/or the sporter have to pass a lie detector test, if ony for show, there will be no chance for them to fail it, the same reason she wanted to talk to Freddy in private.  What Paulus did not hear, he could not attest to on a lie detector test or otherwise, and it made the game plan easier for Anita to carry it out because she was not under the scrutiny of that silly old raising your hand and swearing or giving testimony or lie detectors, or giving testimony.

So much easier for Anita to be the catalyst with the refugees and Taco.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #549 11/27 - 11/28/2006
Post by: San on November 28, 2006, 04:08:00 PM
From Fox News the LIVE DESK w/Martha MacCallum:

Almost a year and a half since Natalee Hollow disappeared in Aruba but now there is a possible break in this case.  A Dutch TV show is claiming now that the Aruban Lawyer for the prime suspect Joran Van der Sloot met with the prosecutor in this case to talk about Joran guilt.  Can this be used against Joran Van der Sloot at this point?

From Aruba on the phone is Peter De Vries who is the Dutch Crime reporter who broke this story.  Peter good to have you with us today.

Peter:  Yeah hello Martha well I’m not at Aruba I am in Holland.

Martha:  Well alright well good to have you from Holland and thank you for very much for being with us.  Let me ask you a question and I’ve gone through some of what you said already but explain to our viewer exactly what you understand Joran’s lawyer told to Karin Janssen the prosecutor.

Peter:  What I found out is that the lawyer of Joran Mr. Carlo made an appointment with Head Prosecutor Karin Janssen and he said he wanted to talk with her and then she said well now I can’t do that that’s highly unusual, we can’t talk during an investigation.  But then he said I have to talk to you please and she admitted and she say OK you can come to my office and then the two had a talk and Mr. Carlo said yeah I have to clear my conscience I can tell you that my client Joran has played a major role in the disappearance of Natalee Holloway and I want you to know that and of course it’s up to you to deliver the full proof for that but I can tell you that he is playing a major role in this.

Matha:  And your reporting says that happened in June just a month after she disappeared is that correct?

Peter:  Yeah it was shortly after the arrest of Joran.

Martha:  Alright tell me what you think he meant by played a major part?  Was there any elaboration on that because I know you confronted him about this meeting?

Peter:  Yeah what I know is at least Karin Janssen the Head Prosecutor understood this that he has killed on the disappearance of Natalle that he has something to do with it.  So there is no misunderstanding about that because when they didn’t manage to solve this case Karen Janssen also wrote Mr. Carlo a letter a couple of months later and then she said can we please have a new talk about this?  Can you give some more details?  Then Mr. Carlo got scared because he thought that’s what he understood it was a secret meeting secret talk but when the Head Prosecutor was writing it down in a letter it was no longer a secret.

Martha:  Right that made him nervous to think about putting this down on paper.  Peter De Vries thank you so much.

On the phone from Alabama Beth Holloway Twitty:

Martha:  Beth welcome to you.

Beth:  Hi.

Martha:  Tell me what you think about this?

Beth:  Well I tell you I think Peter De Vries is just absolutely amazing.  I always thought someone from the Netherlands could help solve this and he has just been able to get in there and to get this confirmation that we’ve known all along that there were persons that were responsible for obstruction of justice and protecting the suspects and derailing the investigation.  He has given us that affirmation.

Martha:  You know of course lawyers for the other side and we’re going to talk to Joe Tacopina in a moment.  But they are going to say there is no evidence to support this and that the fact that he wouldn’t go back a write all this information down and document it discredits what he is saying.  What do you think about that Beth?

Beth:  Well I think they will always have to look at there were two personnel involved from the Aruban Justice Department and that is why we don’t have any evidence and that’s what Joran’s attorney will have to be reminded of.  It’s because of Bob Witt and Ben King stopped the search warrants.  It was made to initially search the entire area of Mon. 19 the garden, the buildings and everything but on the spot high ranking employee of the Justice Office Bob Witt reduced the search warrant to only the room of Joran so that’s why we don’t have any evidence because of involvement of the obstruction from the Aruban Justice Department personnel.

Matha:  Beth what do you think about the fact that he panicked.  He says that this lawyer panicked when he went and said to him you know this is the information I have.  What does that say to you about corruption we’ve heard so much about corruption in this situation.

Beth:  Well I think it just speaks (inaudible) highly that there was a lot of collusion involved and whether that’s you know from conflict of interest I mean it might be a another way of putting it, a milder form of corruption.  But you know certainly there were many red flags that were going on as far as collusion from the personnel within the Aruban Justice Department with the father and Antonio Carlo and we can’t deny that.  Now we have names and faces of these persons.

Martha:  Alright.  Beth just quickly very quickly in 5 seconds or10 seconds can you tell me you’ve often said that there is information that you have that you can’t put out there.  Did you know any of this?  Did you know about this conversation between this lawyer can you substantiate that and prosecutor.

Beth:  You know we always knew like I said we would take one step forward but then we knew there were persons in front moving but you know we could not get any vindication or affirmation that this was actually any of these persons were that were actually doing this and so now like I said we have these faces we knew this was going on this undercurrent to the investigation but we just couldn’t get the names and faces and now we finally have them.

Joe Tacopina from Rome Italy:

Martha:  What do you make of these revelations from this reporter in the Netherlands?

Joe:  What I make of it Martha is another individual trying to cash in on this tragedy this guy is a materialist, he’s a capitalist; he is someone is making money off of a false story.  I spoke to Antonio Carlo the former lawyer for Joran; he made no such statement to the prosecutor and let me tell you this I’ve looked through every single document in this case.  Every police report every prosecutors note there is no such document in this case.  Every police report every prosecutors note there is no such document that supports any such claim and when you couple that with the fact that this individual didn’t even have the wherewithal to document these very important conversations Martha at the time they were going on and didn’t report that to law enforcement I mean it shows you his true motive.  He’s trying to make his splash he is trying to get himself all over the news which is what people have done repeatedly in this case.  This is another one of these tragic instances in the Holloway/Van der Sloot investigation which you have people coming up with false stories.  You’ve heard about this Dr. Phil tape that turned out to be a doctored tape where Deepak Kalpoe was supposedly confessing.  Beth Holloway did the same thing with that she got on the air and said finally we knew there was a confession.  That turned out to be false.  You heard about false confessions while they were in jail that they all admitted to the crime, turned out to be false.  It’s just another instance where it’s just an act of desperation on Ms. Holloway’s part and we understand her desire to get this case resolved but I think if she did what Greta Van Susteren’s doing and the prosecutors for all that matter taking a broader look at this case.  Looking at other areas other leads they’ve looked at Joran Van der Sloot up and down he is not involved in Natalee’s disappearance.  The prosecutors have all but dropped their case against him.  The lawsuit that Ms. Holloway filed against our client was dismissed in New York courts.

Martha:  Right there were no grounds for it in New York according to that judge.  Just to go back for one minute to the Joran Van der Sloot household.  You know this question of how much an area they could search.  According to this reporter Mr. De Vries he says the search warrant would have allowed them to search the entire property but when they got there they were told by a Justice Department official who answered the door that they would only be allowed to search Joran’s house what do you know about that?  Joran’s room excuse me.

Joe:  Right well Joran’s room is separate quarters and that the judge specifically ordered that his living quarters be searched.  So I’m sorry if people are upset that the police have to comply with the courts orders but that’s what they were asked to do that’s what the court gave them permission to do and that’s what they did they turned his room his apartment upside down.  As far as being in the house I mean look they’ve had at it with the Van der Sloots.  They’ve had Joran in jail for three months they’ve had Mr. Van der Sloot in jail for many days, weeks and there is nothing that came out of this they did a search.  I mean they’ve turned Aruba upside down every grain of sand has been moved so let’s not pretend that they missed you know the evidence.  They’ve missed the body of Natalee in the Van der Sloot household.  Many people have been in and out of that household in the last year and a half.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #549 11/27 - 11/28/2006
Post by: Tylergal on November 28, 2006, 04:11:34 PM
Hey, San, thank you so much for tihs transcript.  I really needed to go back over it although I had heard it, because I wanted to scrutinize the Joe TacoToast statements (urrhhh, lies).  Yep.

What is a medley relay?  Is it four players who pass off to one another, as in if I send you a letter in New York, San, and you send it to Washington, D.C. and that sender mails it to Arkansas, and that person sends it to Aruba, is that like a medley relay?


Title: Lively Case Discussion #549 11/27 - 11/28/2006
Post by: klaasend on November 28, 2006, 04:13:51 PM
{snipped}

Joe: What I make of it Martha is another individual trying to cash in on this tragedy this guy is a materialist, he’s a capitalist; he is someone is making money off of a false story. I spoke to Antonio Carlo the former lawyer for Joran; he made no such statement to the prosecutor and let me tell you this I’ve looked through every single document in this case

hmmm....former?


Title: Lively Case Discussion #549 11/27 - 11/28/2006
Post by: Tylergal on November 28, 2006, 04:19:45 PM
I'll bet he did get in touch with Antonio or Antonio with him.  I bet their lines were hotter than $2 pistol.  Trapped in their own lies.  Makes someone like a taco stay up night trying to cover the tails of those who tell the tales.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #549 11/27 - 11/28/2006
Post by: igsigs on November 28, 2006, 04:21:04 PM
Quote from: "klaasend"
{snipped}

Joe: What I make of it Martha is another individual trying to cash in on this tragedy this guy is a materialist, he’s a capitalist; he is someone is making money off of a false story. I spoke to Antonio Carlo the former lawyer for Joran; he made no such statement to the prosecutor and let me tell you this I’ve looked through every single document in this case

hmmm....former?

That MF post you brought over this morning indicated that Carlo is still his lawyer. Taco is a dumbass, IMO.

SAN- thanks for trans!


Title: Lively Case Discussion #549 11/27 - 11/28/2006
Post by: Tylergal on November 28, 2006, 04:21:26 PM
Anytime we start getting close to outing them, the Refugees go wild.  Find out who it is they are "dissing" the worst and you will know who is closest to the truth.  They abhor anyone close to the truth.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #549 11/27 - 11/28/2006
Post by: truthseeker2 on November 28, 2006, 04:21:29 PM
Quote from: "Shizaru"
The crime scene was NOT the VDS home.  That is highly inconsistent with the evidence (text messages, polis car tape) and logic (2K have no motive to lie about dropoff point, ect).  IMO.


I guess if you buy into the text messages, or even if you consider the text messages as 'for real" I don't think they rule out the scene of the crime as being the VDS property.  The test messages could have been sent during the "first attempt to dispose of the body" as a cover.  

One thing I remember from the polis car tape was Deepak saying to Joran something about "your own father".  Earlier upthread there was a brief discussion about Joran procuring for someone else.  Could have been PVDS??  

If you followed any of the Shango/Simian, "Simian Says: June 26th, 2005 at 10:24 pm
The boy is no Ajax. He is too afraid of the consequences. He doesn’t want to be made a cafone.
The third act needs to be played and the cowboys will be heroes.
This is all a “lugubrious game" to them. They were all at the party and all of them are turning their heads.
One of them needs to be pinched. "

Look up "lugubrious game " and you will find this is a painting by Dali, one of sexual perversion and castration.  You can also find opinons of Dali's subconscious motives for this painting, some of which may just apply to PVDS as well.

Joran himself put them all at or outside his home when he did the interview with Greta.  Why?  He said they never got out of the car. Why?  Because he knew they may have been seen there, or at least the car was seen there?  Maybe ole Paulus was having his own little party while Mama Sloot was away.  With a few friends over, too.

If Paulus was the man seen at the blackjack table that night with the MB students and Joran, could it be possible that he selected Natalee for himself and Joran paid the K2's to drive him out to get her?  Weren't there some rumors about ATM's in the early morning hours?  The K2's may have already been paid drivers earlier, but more money would be needed for grave digging.

I think the possibility of the VDS home being the crime scene is as good as any.  But....who really knows?


Title: Lively Case Discussion #549 11/27 - 11/28/2006
Post by: thirdstrike on November 28, 2006, 04:24:56 PM
Yeah, based on hearing this, I'd bet the farm (wait, a farm in Los Angeles??  My bad...) that there was such a notification made by Joran's "former" attorney.  But, Taco's just doing what he's being paid to do...and, that's being slimy!

As for this special...again, I've been away for a while.  Have we here in the US been able to see that De Vries special anywhere (internet, TV, or otherwise)?


Title: Lively Case Discussion #549 11/27 - 11/28/2006
Post by: thirdstrike on November 28, 2006, 04:27:31 PM
Quote from: "Shizaru"
The crime scene was NOT the VDS home.  That is highly inconsistent with the evidence (text messages, polis car tape) and logic (2K have no motive to lie about dropoff point, ect).  IMO.


I've always believed this to be the case.  I still think the crime scene was located along that beach somewhere...as what started out as rape turned to "accidental" murder.  But, there's been so many inconsistencies, who knows at this point... :roll:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #549 11/27 - 11/28/2006
Post by: IndyDan on November 28, 2006, 04:36:28 PM
I'm glad we got that cocaine issue out of the way, I knew there was no way in hell Natalee ever touched coke.  Obviously just more trashing of the victim by the coverup team and DeVries took the bait.  I was wondering, since I've never seen a translated transcript of the show, did DeVries ever go into what a classy young lady Natalee was and all her accomplishments?


Title: Lively Case Discussion #549 11/27 - 11/28/2006
Post by: IndyDan on November 28, 2006, 04:39:53 PM
And another topic I'd love to see DeVries touch on is how these animals made Beth apologize publicly to under the threat of stopping the investigation.  A total lack of professionalism I think the Dutch audience should hear about.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #549 11/27 - 11/28/2006
Post by: Tylergal on November 28, 2006, 04:42:22 PM
Quote from: "IndyDan"
And another topic I'd love to see DeVries touch on is how these animals made Beth apologize publicly to under the threat of stopping the investigation.  A total lack of professionalism I think the Dutch audience should hear about.


Not only as you say, lacking class, but illegal in any free world, but I forgot.  This is third-world Aruba, where the government and its own mobsters rule.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #549 11/27 - 11/28/2006
Post by: AnnieMW1 on November 28, 2006, 04:43:31 PM
Quote from: "San"
Joe Tacopina is on Fox.  He said De Vries is a materialist and capitalist and is tryinbg to make money.


Did he explain the e-mail trail surrounding the photos?  This guy is almost as bad as the Arubans!  :twisted:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #549 11/27 - 11/28/2006
Post by: Tylergal on November 28, 2006, 04:44:18 PM
Just read that a federal judge as declared American paper money unfair to blind.  We are headed down that slippery slope.  I am one who does not have good eyesight secondary to only having vision in one eye but I would NEVER demand a whole country change its traditional lifestyle for an inconvenience.  I do know this is just another ploy of some of Bubba's judges to take us down a slippery slope.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #549 11/27 - 11/28/2006
Post by: robots on November 28, 2006, 04:44:39 PM
Quote from: "AnnieMW1"
Quote from: "San"
Joe Tacopina is on Fox.  He said De Vries is a materialist and capitalist and is tryinbg to make money.


Did he explain the e-mail trail surrounding the photos?  This guy is almost as bad as the Arubans!  :twisted:



is it possible for JOE T to sue himself for being such a JACKASS  :twisted:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #549 11/27 - 11/28/2006
Post by: 2NJSons_Mom on November 28, 2006, 04:57:01 PM
Quote from: "WidgetTheMidget"
PEOPLE THAT SHOULD BE JACK BAUERED ...........

JORAN HIJO DE PUTA

PAULUS CHINGA SU MADRE

ANITA LA GRAN PUTA DE ARUBA

KJ FISCAL DE MI CULO

AND ALL THE REST OF THE DUTCH IN THE WORLD ..........

 :roll:


 :lol:  :lol: The Italian I do know, which is obviously not the finest, helped me to decipher this.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #549 11/27 - 11/28/2006
Post by: blah on November 28, 2006, 05:01:44 PM
Quote from: "klaasend"
{snipped}

Joe: What I make of it Martha is another individual trying to cash in on this tragedy this guy is a materialist, he’s a capitalist; he is someone is making money off of a false story. I spoke to Antonio Carlo the former lawyer for Joran; he made no such statement to the prosecutor and let me tell you this I’ve looked through every single document in this case

hmmm....former?


i think he is repersenting either Deepak or Satish or both now. (for quite some time)

or am I wrong?


Title: Lively Case Discussion #549 11/27 - 11/28/2006
Post by: Mere on November 28, 2006, 05:01:56 PM
Good afternoon friends....recovering from food poisoning....have read pages and pages of your thoughts, and I am proud to be part of the group.

Looks like deVries has opened a can of worms and has done a good job in a short time.  I hope that we will be able to see his program....with subtitles.... :D  

The photoshopped pictures of Joran are such an insult.  His parents are taking a big chance letting him travel out of Aruba and without direct supervision.  On the other hand, he just may do himself in with his big, grandiose mouth that cannot stay shut.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #549 11/27 - 11/28/2006
Post by: A's Fever on November 28, 2006, 05:02:33 PM
Quote from: "Tylergal"
I noticed on Gretawire, (I went there for the first time in months today), there were not many e-mails regards the Natalee Holloway case and her special guest, Mr. DeVries.  I suppose I should have sent her one myself.  I want someone who has more patience than I to write her and tell her the reason she got so little e-mail regarding the case was not due to a lack of interest in the case but a lack of interest in her program since she chose darkness over light when she chose to believe the sporter with whom it appeared she was having a little interaction with on TV. Hmmm.  Makes ne wonder what her fellow Scientologists thought of the ittle "body talk" between her and the delicious sporter.


Did they flirt, Tyler??  Ugh!


Title: Lively Case Discussion #549 11/27 - 11/28/2006
Post by: nonesuche on November 28, 2006, 05:02:33 PM
San - Thank you so much for the transcript today ! You and Jacq also for the ones last night, thank you!

truthseeker2-

Interesting points you make, thank you for your post. Some of us are inclined to believe Paulus was more involved and I am glad to have your insight particularly with the Shango reference.

I am sure Lala's will appreciate that one too !


Title: Lively Case Discussion #549 11/27 - 11/28/2006
Post by: nonesuche on November 28, 2006, 05:04:55 PM
MeMere- I''m so sorry - food poisoning? POOR YOU !!!!! I hope you feel much better soon.

I seem to have a plumbling leak that just sprung, so will have to run for now. Keep up the great work monkeys !

oh Klaas, this is for you a monkey on the head  :lol:

(http://i86.photobucket.com/albums/k101/daisysistah/GIFS/smilies/memymonky.gif)


Title: Lively Case Discussion #549 11/27 - 11/28/2006
Post by: klaasend on November 28, 2006, 05:10:09 PM
Quote from: "blah"
Quote from: "klaasend"
{snipped}

Joe: What I make of it Martha is another individual trying to cash in on this tragedy this guy is a materialist, he’s a capitalist; he is someone is making money off of a false story. I spoke to Antonio Carlo the former lawyer for Joran; he made no such statement to the prosecutor and let me tell you this I’ve looked through every single document in this case

hmmm....former?


i think he is repersenting either Deepak or Satish or both now. (for quite some time)

or am I wrong?


You could be right, just not sure.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #549 11/27 - 11/28/2006
Post by: klaasend on November 28, 2006, 05:11:32 PM
Quote from: "MeMere"
Good afternoon friends....recovering from food poisoning....have read pages and pages of your thoughts, and I am proud to be part of the group.

Looks like deVries has opened a can of worms and has done a good job in a short time.  I hope that we will be able to see his program....with subtitles.... :D  

The photoshopped pictures of Joran are such an insult.  His parents are taking a big chance letting him travel out of Aruba and without direct supervision.  On the other hand, he just may do himself in with his big, grandiose mouth that cannot stay shut.


Food poisoning!!  Poor thing!  Hope you are almost over it now!


Title: Lively Case Discussion #549 11/27 - 11/28/2006
Post by: klaasend on November 28, 2006, 05:12:23 PM
Just posted by Michael (Netherlands) on the front page of SM:

Peter de Vries is on the late night show Jensen in The Netherlands now airing and Beth is live on the phone in the show also. Peter thinks that the case can be resolved.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #549 11/27 - 11/28/2006
Post by: blah on November 28, 2006, 05:12:30 PM
Quote from: "klaasend"
Quote from: "blah"
Quote from: "klaasend"
{snipped}

Joe: What I make of it Martha is another individual trying to cash in on this tragedy this guy is a materialist, he’s a capitalist; he is someone is making money off of a false story. I spoke to Antonio Carlo the former lawyer for Joran; he made no such statement to the prosecutor and let me tell you this I’ve looked through every single document in this case

hmmm....former?


i think he is repersenting either Deepak or Satish or both now. (for quite some time)

or am I wrong?


You could be right, just not sure.


I thought I heard or read that way back when there was a bunch of talk about if joran really had 9 lawyers or whatever but i'm not 100% positive


Title: Lively Case Discussion #549 11/27 - 11/28/2006
Post by: blah on November 28, 2006, 05:13:56 PM
Quote from: "klaasend"
Just posted by Michael (Netherlands) on the front page of SM:

Peter de Vries is on the late night show Jensen in The Netherlands now airing and Beth is live on the phone in the show also. Peter thinks that the case can be resolved.


the case could be solved in less than an hour if they let the FBI interview the killers


Title: Lively Case Discussion #549 11/27 - 11/28/2006
Post by: A's Fever on November 28, 2006, 05:14:47 PM
Quote from: "blah"
Quote from: "klaasend"
Just posted by Michael (Netherlands) on the front page of SM:

Peter de Vries is on the late night show Jensen in The Netherlands now airing and Beth is live on the phone in the show also. Peter thinks that the case can be resolved.


the case could be solved in less than an hour if they let the FBI interview the killers


You nailed it, blah!


Title: Lively Case Discussion #549 11/27 - 11/28/2006
Post by: blah on November 28, 2006, 05:14:58 PM
Quote from: "blah"
Quote from: "klaasend"
Just posted by Michael (Netherlands) on the front page of SM:

Peter de Vries is on the late night show Jensen in The Netherlands now airing and Beth is live on the phone in the show also. Peter thinks that the case can be resolved.


the case could be solved in less than an hour if they let the FBI interview the killers


speaking of which, this is something that Devries really should drive home - the fact that the FBI was never really allowed to be a part of the case


Title: Lively Case Discussion #549 11/27 - 11/28/2006
Post by: blah on November 28, 2006, 05:17:30 PM
i missed Beth on Greta last night, what did she say about scared monkeys ?


Title: Lively Case Discussion #549 11/27 - 11/28/2006
Post by: igsigs on November 28, 2006, 05:18:25 PM
Q: IS KARIN JANSSEN A CRIMINAL?

Exhibit A from De Vries.
"Mr. Carlo said yeah I have to clear my conscience I can tell you that my client Joran has played a major role in the disappearance of Natalee Holloway and I want you to know that."

Exhibit B from De Vries.
Janssen response to De Vries per MF. "Janssen just answered some of the questions she was asked in writing by e-mail. She defended the program Opsporings Verzocht were the focus were not on Joran or the Kalpoe brothers but gave a broader look so it might trigger other information that had nothing to do with the suspects. She said she was personally involved and oversaw the production of the program. In the program there was no emphasis put on the size of the shoe or the shoe itself and how he got home and this is what Karin wanted. And she defended her decision. She wanted that the investigation to be as broad as possible and not focused on Joran and his friends."

A: YES![/color]


Title: Lively Case Discussion #549 11/27 - 11/28/2006
Post by: blah on November 28, 2006, 05:21:06 PM
Quote from: "igsigs"
Q: IS KARIN JANSSEN A CRIMINAL?

Exhibit A from De Vries.
"Mr. Carlo said yeah I have to clear my conscience I can tell you that my client Joran has played a major role in the disappearance of Natalee Holloway and I want you to know that."

Exhibit B from De Vries.
Janssen response to De Vries per MF. "Janssen just answered some of the questions she was asked in writing by e-mail. She defended the program Opsporings Verzocht were the focus were not on Joran or the Kalpoe brothers but gave a broader look so it might trigger other information that had nothing to do with the suspects. She said she was personally involved and oversaw the production of the program. In the program there was no emphasis put on the size of the shoe or the shoe itself and how he got home and this is what Karin wanted. And she defended her decision. She wanted that the investigation to be as broad as possible and not focused on Joran and his friends."

A: YES![/color]


So i think we can assume that it was HER idea to use someone who looked, talked, and acting NOTHING like Joran to portray him.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #549 11/27 - 11/28/2006
Post by: Bobo2 on November 28, 2006, 05:21:24 PM
Quote from: "blah"
i missed Beth on Greta last night, what did she say about scared monkeys ?



Beth: No not anything and you know were just so fortunate we were able to make that move in Amsterdam and for Peter De Vries to pick up on Scaredmonkeys.com and delve into the statements because otherwise we would not even now finally find out the persons who were involved like I said in derailing the investigation.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #549 11/27 - 11/28/2006
Post by: blah on November 28, 2006, 05:25:55 PM
Quote from: "Bobo2"
Quote from: "blah"
i missed Beth on Greta last night, what did she say about scared monkeys ?



Beth: No not anything and you know were just so fortunate we were able to make that move in Amsterdam and for Peter De Vries to pick up on Scaredmonkeys.com and delve into the statements because otherwise we would not even now finally find out the persons who were involved like I said in derailing the investigation.


allright!!!  Thanks Bobo2 !!!!


Title: Lively Case Discussion #549 11/27 - 11/28/2006
Post by: blah on November 28, 2006, 05:32:32 PM
when I first saw the photo Joran had made for him I really didnt think a whole lot of it other than it was a stupid thing to do and in very bad tatse.

The more I think about it, the more bizaare i think it is.  What kind of sicko does something like that?  He and his little pimp wanna-bes probably laugh about it and think it is funny.  What purpose could it serve other than to entertain themselves in some sort of sick twisted way?  If Joran was innocent, he would come unglued at the person who made that picture, but he actually PAID someone to make it??  And paid good money too!!  He gets some sort of joy at looking at that picture when it should be tearing his heart out instead.  This kid is pure evil.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #549 11/27 - 11/28/2006
Post by: blah on November 28, 2006, 05:36:49 PM
do we have any psychologists that have an opinion as to why Joran would have that picture made like that?  Has there ever been any other criminals that have done something like this?  Surley there has never been anyone falsely accused who has done something like this, has there?

I want some professional opinions bout this (interested in non-professionsl too though!)


Title: Lively Case Discussion #549 11/27 - 11/28/2006
Post by: San on November 28, 2006, 05:40:08 PM
Quote from: "blah"
do we have any psychologists that have an opinion as to why Joran would have that picture made like that?  Has there ever been any other criminals that have done something like this?  Surley there has never been anyone falsely accused who has done something like this, has there?

I want some professional opinions bout this (interested in non-professionsl too though!)

I'm not a psychologist but I did sleep at a Holiday Inn last night :lol:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #549 11/27 - 11/28/2006
Post by: blah on November 28, 2006, 05:44:19 PM
Quote from: "San"
Quote from: "blah"
do we have any psychologists that have an opinion as to why Joran would have that picture made like that?  Has there ever been any other criminals that have done something like this?  Surley there has never been anyone falsely accused who has done something like this, has there?

I want some professional opinions bout this (interested in non-professionsl too though!)

I'm not a psychologist but I did sleep at a Holiday Inn last night :lol:


do you have any idea why he would have paid someone to make that picture?


Title: Lively Case Discussion #549 11/27 - 11/28/2006
Post by: San on November 28, 2006, 05:45:40 PM
Quote from: "blah"
Quote from: "San"
Quote from: "blah"
do we have any psychologists that have an opinion as to why Joran would have that picture made like that?  Has there ever been any other criminals that have done something like this?  Surley there has never been anyone falsely accused who has done something like this, has there?

I want some professional opinions bout this (interested in non-professionsl too though!)

I'm not a psychologist but I did sleep at a Holiday Inn last night :lol:


do you have any idea why he would have paid someone to make that picture?

I liked Robots reasoning last night.  He wanted to show it to people in the Netherlands saying that he and Natalee had a previous relationship and that he would have never harmed her.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #549 11/27 - 11/28/2006
Post by: AnnieMW1 on November 28, 2006, 05:46:16 PM
I wonder why DeVries is saying at this juncture that he thinks the case can be solved.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #549 11/27 - 11/28/2006
Post by: San on November 28, 2006, 05:50:43 PM
Quote from: "AnnieMW1"
I wonder why DeVries is saying at this juncture that he thinks the case can be solved.

I wonder who he talked to.  I wonder what he has in his possession.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #549 11/27 - 11/28/2006
Post by: blah on November 28, 2006, 05:51:24 PM
Quote from: "AnnieMW1"
I wonder why DeVries is saying at this juncture that he thinks the case can be solved.


I think its like Beth said - start going after the people who helped with the cover-up but didnt actually participate in the crime against Natalee.  Put pressure on these folks and they will sing like birds.  People like Ben vocKING, Judge De Wit, JOHN CARLO, Karen Jansen.  Go after those that are involved in the cover-up and see if they are really willing to take the fall for these punks.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #549 11/27 - 11/28/2006
Post by: Sue on November 28, 2006, 05:55:00 PM
Quote from: "klaasend"
Just posted by Michael (Netherlands) on the front page of SM:

Peter de Vries is on the late night show Jensen in The Netherlands now airing and Beth is live on the phone in the show also. Peter thinks that the case can be resolved.


Is that same show Beth was on before over there??


Title: Lively Case Discussion #549 11/27 - 11/28/2006
Post by: klaasend on November 28, 2006, 05:57:55 PM
Found the perfect xmas gift for Renfro:
 :lol:  :lol:

(http://www.catalogfavorites.com/images/V29437B.jpg)


Title: Lively Case Discussion #549 11/27 - 11/28/2006
Post by: Anna on November 28, 2006, 05:58:31 PM
Quote from: "Tylergal"
Quote from: "Shizaru"
The crime scene was NOT the VDS home.  That is highly inconsistent with the evidence (text messages, polis car tape) and logic (2K have no motive to lie about dropoff point, ect).  IMO.


Shizaru, even our FBI on Fox admitted these text messages and so forth were red herrings they used to keep the dog off the trail and FBI believed they were all sitting within 2 feet of one another while messaging back and forth.


Shiz,
The disclaimer on the computer report that we saw makes that whole thing laughable.  It says something like and I paprphrase:  A bunch of stuff was deleted so we don't have any of that.

And now it seems Joran did have a lap top all along after all, the one he had professionally scrubbed for some odd reason.

If in the Sloot residence, they could have used the landline instead of the cells and not have records of calls even.  We have only Deepak's word for what Joran said anyway.  That hardly constitutes proof of anything.

No, there is no evidence they were at the beach, unless they were invisible.

.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #549 11/27 - 11/28/2006
Post by: klaasend on November 28, 2006, 06:00:52 PM
Quote from: "Sue"
Quote from: "klaasend"
Just posted by Michael (Netherlands) on the front page of SM:

Peter de Vries is on the late night show Jensen in The Netherlands now airing and Beth is live on the phone in the show also. Peter thinks that the case can be resolved.


Is that same show Beth was on before over there??

Yes


Title: Lively Case Discussion #549 11/27 - 11/28/2006
Post by: bleachedblack on November 28, 2006, 06:01:01 PM
Quote from: "Shizaru"
The crime scene was NOT the VDS home.  That is highly inconsistent with the evidence (text messages, polis car tape) and logic (2K have no motive to lie about dropoff point, ect).  IMO.


Shizaru I am not sure how you can say this with such decisiveness.
When Jorans lies were flying fast and furious and he admitted stopping at his house but said she didn't get out of the car they exchanged emails or some nonesence.......this sounds likely a partial truth consistent with being fabricated to cover for the fact someone might have seen the K's car drop him (and Natalee) off there.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #549 11/27 - 11/28/2006
Post by: AZLady on November 28, 2006, 06:01:32 PM
The picture might be Joran's attempt to create a trophy.  I think Daddy and Mommy took all of Joran's trophies away from him, not trusting that someone else might get a hold of them.  As we've read, psychopathic killers keep trophies of their conquests and looking at these trophies is how they relive and re-experience the event.  It's a very strong psychological compulsion.  I believe Joran is obsessed with Natalee.  He may make up other explanations, but I think the root of the thing is to re-create for himself a trophy that helps him relive the experience.  This trophy picture is an unusual pose and expression for Natalee, and his picture in the photo is unsmiling and back to Natalee, rather superior to her.  Joran is a very sick individual and we are seeing one aspect of that sickness in this photo.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #549 11/27 - 11/28/2006
Post by: blah on November 28, 2006, 06:06:50 PM
Quote from: "AZLady"
The picture might be Joran's attempt to create a trophy.  I think Daddy and Mommy took all of Joran's trophies away from him, not trusting that someone else might get a hold of them.  As we've read, psychopathic killers keep trophies of their conquests and looking at these trophies is how they relive and re-experience the event.  It's a very strong psychological compulsion.  I believe Joran is obsessed with Natalee.  He may make up other explanations, but I think the root of the thing is to re-create for himself a trophy that helps him relive the experience.  This trophy picture is an unusual pose and expression for Natalee, and his picture in the photo is unsmiling and back to Natalee, rather superior to her.  Joran is a very sick individual and we are seeing one aspect of that sickness in this photo.


this is what i am thinking also


Title: Lively Case Discussion #549 11/27 - 11/28/2006
Post by: robots on November 28, 2006, 06:08:06 PM
Quote from: "San"
Quote from: "blah"
Quote from: "San"
Quote from: "blah"
do we have any psychologists that have an opinion as to why Joran would have that picture made like that?  Has there ever been any other criminals that have done something like this?  Surley there has never been anyone falsely accused who has done something like this, has there?

I want some professional opinions bout this (interested in non-professionsl too though!)

I'm not a psychologist but I did sleep at a Holiday Inn last night :lol:


do you have any idea why he would have paid someone to make that picture?

I liked Robots reasoning last night.  He wanted to show it to people in the Netherlands saying that he and Natalee had a previous relationship and that he would have never harmed her.


i liked robots theory too
 8)


we know there are a lot of people that HAVE NOT FOLLOWED the case
as much as others

JORAN could lie to people that HAVE NOT followed the case and they would say

"oh yea, i saw joran in a picture with Natalee from a couple years ago"

"he would never hurt her"


Title: Lively Case Discussion #549 11/27 - 11/28/2006
Post by: shadow on November 28, 2006, 06:09:09 PM
Quote from: "AZLady"
The picture might be Joran's attempt to create a trophy.  I think Daddy and Mommy took all of Joran's trophies away from him, not trusting that someone else might get a hold of them.  As we've read, psychopathic killers keep trophies of their conquests and looking at these trophies is how they relive and re-experience the event.  It's a very strong psychological compulsion.  I believe Joran is obsessed with Natalee.  He may make up other explanations, but I think the root of the thing is to re-create for himself a trophy that helps him relive the experience.  This trophy picture is an unusual pose and expression for Natalee, and his picture in the photo is unsmiling and back to Natalee, rather superior to her.  Joran is a very sick individual and we are seeing one aspect of that sickness in this photo.


I agree with you 100%

Evening Monkeys!

Truthseeker: Good post . . . IMO there was a party at the Sloot house and it was for Daddy and his cronies. Wonder if King, Schmid and Croes were there too?


Title: Lively Case Discussion #549 11/27 - 11/28/2006
Post by: Buckeye on November 28, 2006, 06:09:47 PM
San and Jacq

Thanks for transcripts.

blah

The earring is there.  The pict posted just didn't show it. I never heard that Carlo was representing K2 (just Ooman and Kock...but maybe it's the same firm??)

All

Did MF's post say that Carlo said Joran was having a hearing the 30th??  Thought it was just K2.

Does anyone else remember the early post about Natalee falling by the pool after trying to get over the Sloot gate??  I have always thought that that was the reason for the "talk by the pool" by PVDS.

If Carlo is not Joran's lawyer...can he be sworn in???


Title: Lively Case Discussion #549 11/27 - 11/28/2006
Post by: Anna on November 28, 2006, 06:10:03 PM
Quote from: "Tylergal"
Hey, San, thank you so much for tihs transcript.  I really needed to go back over it although I had heard it, because I wanted to scrutinize the Joe TacoToast statements (urrhhh, lies).  Yep.

What is a medley relay?  Is it four players who pass off to one another, as in if I send you a letter in New York, San, and you send it to Washington, D.C. and that sender mails it to Arkansas, and that person sends it to Aruba, is that like a medley relay?


Sounds like a Medley Relay to me, Tyler.

.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #549 11/27 - 11/28/2006
Post by: robots on November 28, 2006, 06:10:13 PM
KARIN is a KRIMINAL  8)


Title: Lively Case Discussion #549 11/27 - 11/28/2006
Post by: AZLady on November 28, 2006, 06:10:15 PM
Doesn't this seem like the logic of a sick individual:  I know her, therefore, I would not hurt her.  Even if this is Joran's motivation, it is not logical thinking.  Many, many violent crimes are committed by spouses or significant others.  The fact that a prior relationship existed makes him even more of a suspect, in most cases, rather than less.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #549 11/27 - 11/28/2006
Post by: Buckeye on November 28, 2006, 06:12:13 PM
One more thought....maybe Joran was going to claim to have spent this New Years with Natalee...never thinking we would see the photo.....that would be worth $200.  :shock:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #549 11/27 - 11/28/2006
Post by: robots on November 28, 2006, 06:12:22 PM
its like a PEDOPHILE who takes pictures of HIMSELF helping out a
CUB SCOUT CAMP


 :shock:  :shock:  :shock:  :shock:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #549 11/27 - 11/28/2006
Post by: sharon on November 28, 2006, 06:12:29 PM
Quote from: "blah"
when I first saw the photo Joran had made for him I really didnt think a whole lot of it other than it was a stupid thing to do and in very bad tatse.

The more I think about it, the more bizaare i think it is.  What kind of sicko does something like that?  He and his little pimp wanna-bes probably laugh about it and think it is funny.  What purpose could it serve other than to entertain themselves in some sort of sick twisted way?  If Joran was innocent, he would come unglued at the person who made that picture, but he actually PAID someone to make it??  And paid good money too!!  He gets some sort of joy at looking at that picture when it should be tearing his heart out instead.  This kid is pure evil.


When I first saw it -- it reminded me of the 'preppy murderer' who killed the girl in NY many years ago. Rough sex, he said. She was strangulated.

He made a little video for friends where he laughs as he chokes a doll.

I think that helped to convict him.

Keep it up Joran :twisted:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #549 11/27 - 11/28/2006
Post by: robots on November 28, 2006, 06:18:30 PM
JORAN is trying to persuade OTHERS that he knew Natalee

"SEE,SEE, SEE everyone i knew her, we were friends"


GAG ME WITH A FORK


Title: Lively Case Discussion #549 11/27 - 11/28/2006
Post by: klaasend on November 28, 2006, 06:18:37 PM
I believe Beth and De Vries will be on another show tonight, not sure if it will be Fox.  I'll let you know when I find out.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #549 11/27 - 11/28/2006
Post by: memphis on November 28, 2006, 06:19:33 PM
Quote from: "blah"
Quote from: "igsigs"
Q: IS KARIN JANSSEN A CRIMINAL?

Exhibit A from De Vries.
"Mr. Carlo said yeah I have to clear my conscience I can tell you that my client Joran has played a major role in the disappearance of Natalee Holloway and I want you to know that."

Exhibit B from De Vries.
Janssen response to De Vries per MF. "Janssen just answered some of the questions she was asked in writing by e-mail. She defended the program Opsporings Verzocht were the focus were not on Joran or the Kalpoe brothers but gave a broader look so it might trigger other information that had nothing to do with the suspects. She said she was personally involved and oversaw the production of the program. In the program there was no emphasis put on the size of the shoe or the shoe itself and how he got home and this is what Karin wanted. And she defended her decision. She wanted that the investigation to be as broad as possible and not focused on Joran and his friends."

A: YES![/color]


So i think we can assume that it was HER idea to use someone who looked, talked, and acting NOTHING like Joran to portray him.


I guess this means that we have to question everything KJ did. What about all the people she had arrested? Were they all distractions?  :shock:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #549 11/27 - 11/28/2006
Post by: shadow on November 28, 2006, 06:19:58 PM
Quote from: "klaasend"
I believe Beth and De Vries will be on another show tonight, not sure if it will be Fox.  I'll let you know when I find out.


Thank you Klass! YOU ROCK :!:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #549 11/27 - 11/28/2006
Post by: robots on November 28, 2006, 06:20:02 PM
Quote from: "klaasend"
I believe Beth and De Vries will be on another show tonight, not sure if it will be Fox.  I'll let you know when I find out.



GRETA is a LOAD

lets hope it aint that show  8)


Title: Lively Case Discussion #549 11/27 - 11/28/2006
Post by: MisGivings on November 28, 2006, 06:21:30 PM
Quote from: "klaasend"
Just posted by Michael (Netherlands) on the front page of SM:

Peter de Vries is on the late night show Jensen in The Netherlands now airing and Beth is live on the phone in the show also. Peter thinks that the case can be resolved.



So, does anyone know what the wicked witch of Aruba has to say about all this???


Title: Lively Case Discussion #549 11/27 - 11/28/2006
Post by: robots on November 28, 2006, 06:21:31 PM
Quote from: "memphis"
Quote from: "blah"
Quote from: "igsigs"
Q: IS KARIN JANSSEN A CRIMINAL?

Exhibit A from De Vries.
"Mr. Carlo said yeah I have to clear my conscience I can tell you that my client Joran has played a major role in the disappearance of Natalee Holloway and I want you to know that."

Exhibit B from De Vries.
Janssen response to De Vries per MF. "Janssen just answered some of the questions she was asked in writing by e-mail. She defended the program Opsporings Verzocht were the focus were not on Joran or the Kalpoe brothers but gave a broader look so it might trigger other information that had nothing to do with the suspects. She said she was personally involved and oversaw the production of the program. In the program there was no emphasis put on the size of the shoe or the shoe itself and how he got home and this is what Karin wanted. And she defended her decision. She wanted that the investigation to be as broad as possible and not focused on Joran and his friends."

A: YES![/color]


So i think we can assume that it was HER idea to use someone who looked, talked, and acting NOTHING like Joran to portray him.


I guess this means that we have to question everything KJ did. What about all the people she had arrested? Were they all distractions?  :shock:


YES


DECOYS


throwing the scent off the SWEAT MASTERS  8)


Title: Lively Case Discussion #549 11/27 - 11/28/2006
Post by: San on November 28, 2006, 06:22:40 PM
Quote from: "klaasend"
I believe Beth and De Vries will be on another show tonight, not sure if it will be Fox.  I'll let you know when I find out.

Another one :shock:   Let me go oil my fingers :lol:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #549 11/27 - 11/28/2006
Post by: San on November 28, 2006, 06:23:18 PM
I wonder if Joe Tacopina was in Rome for Tom Cruise's wedding :lol:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #549 11/27 - 11/28/2006
Post by: Anna on November 28, 2006, 06:23:52 PM
Quote from: "San"
Joe Tacopina is on Fox.  He said De Vries is a materialist and capitalist and is trying to make money.


I am so relieved and happy that there is still at least one capitalist in The Netherlands.  Was afraid they were ALL socialists now.  This is tremendous news and very good to hear.  Capitalism is our own form of economy, the strongest and greatest in the world, Joe T.  So what is his philosophy that runs so counter to this?

Seems to pretend to have altruistic motives when in fact passing the Love Bowls at RU to collect fees from among the posters there as though AHATA and the rest are not paying him enough.

.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #549 11/27 - 11/28/2006
Post by: Buckeye on November 28, 2006, 06:24:06 PM
from nuntukamen (now banned) on FOB

Posted: Tue Nov 28th, 2006 04:45 pm   Quote     Reply  
 
here is some very pertinent and firsthand information for all the readers here...

cocaine use by Natalee in this case is meaningless, and here is why:  you do not OD on cocaine by snorting what would be huge individual amounts like an entire gram or two, you OD by INGESTING it, such as a dealer might do fearing an arrest, although if you snorted n entire ounce you would die, but it  would an hour of non-stop snorting to do it;

 you do not get a higher (and/or more risky) cocaine buzz by drinking when you do it: cocaine can accelerate a drinking binge and therefore a drunkeness (this effect is minimal), but drinking with cocaine does not cause death by and of itself

SNORTING cocaine's effects have been compared by such research periodicals as The Scientific American to eating a bag of potato chips and taking a couple of NoDoz on an empty stomach..you want more chips and you are artificially more alert

her drinking was continual, but not out of whack from partying students all over the world until given several Ron Rico 151 SHOTS, which is three times the equivalent of a normal drink, and a favorite tool of the predatory lounge lizard

smoking coke, by the way, is a whole other ballgame from snorting, and i believe the Pimps smoked it, as snorting would be too tame for them--smoking coke can produce extreme sexual aggression, ESPECIALLY WHEN MIXED WITH ALCOHOL

***Deepak admits to participating in gang rapes of American tourist girls where Joran or Freddy procure the victim
***Satish admits putting in a porno flick as the car leaves downtown that Natalee is upset by

these statements were made to police early in the case...this is not a great mystery---i doubt if Natalee had coke, but this accusation, by Pimps, not her fellow students, opens the thought that what if Joran made his money as the cocaine connection within the casinos for tourists on the island, and that is why there was prior FBI electronic investigation occuring on the island?...Paulus and higher ups are likely part of this moneymaking scheme and explains why Joran was there underage, why they allowed him there knowing his age, and how the predatory schemes with the pimps unfolded into a common activity

we have seen gangs like these boys proliferate here in the United States with traveling groups of young men moving town to town selling magazines or carpet cleaner...in the 70s-90s it was prominent regarding "consensual" gang rapes (there is no such thing, despite the rapist's claims)...and before that it was biker gangs providing consensual gang rapes for the media

if these boys aren't guilty there is no need for all the lies they have spoken that have been proven...and if somehow they are totally innocent they still have characters and thinking processes that are a mere notch above a spider's


Title: Lively Case Discussion #549 11/27 - 11/28/2006
Post by: Sue on November 28, 2006, 06:25:06 PM
Quote from: "Buckeye"
One more thought....maybe Joran was going to claim to have spent this New Years with Natalee...never thinking we would see the photo.....that would be worth $200.  :shock:


Never thinking the State Dept woudl know if he was here or not because of visa what a idiot he is


Title: Lively Case Discussion #549 11/27 - 11/28/2006
Post by: robots on November 28, 2006, 06:28:05 PM
the only other thing i can think that JORAN the KILLER could be doing with the photo is TRYING to show by manipulating the date of the picture


in other words,, he could be saying the picture was taken a week after
she was reported missing


see, she was alive, we were at a party and she was there
blah blah blah !!!!!!!

"see i even have a picture of her at the party"

its stupid BUT so is he

and by the way

I HATE HIM


Title: Lively Case Discussion #549 11/27 - 11/28/2006
Post by: Anna on November 28, 2006, 06:30:17 PM
Or pretend it was Natalee at a party in The Netherlands or somewhere in Europe?   :roll:

His intelligence is off the chart, remember, the bottom of the chart that would be.

.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #549 11/27 - 11/28/2006
Post by: robots on November 28, 2006, 06:30:47 PM
Quote from: "Anna"
Or pretend it was Natalee at a party in The Netherlands or somewhere in Europe?   :roll:

His intelligence is off the chart, remember, the bottom of the chart that would be.

.


hehehehe

yes, MORON is his middle name  8)  :twisted:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #549 11/27 - 11/28/2006
Post by: Tylergal on November 28, 2006, 06:31:05 PM
Quote from: "blah"
do we have any psychologists that have an opinion as to why Joran would have that picture made like that?  Has there ever been any other criminals that have done something like this?  Surley there has never been anyone falsely accused who has done something like this, has there?

I want some professional opinions bout this (interested in non-professionsl too though!)


Blah, I am not a professional but I googled for answers and found that it is not uncommon for criminals to pose with their deceased or to insert themselves into photographs with them.  It is their souvenir, like a "notch on the belt."


Title: Lively Case Discussion #549 11/27 - 11/28/2006
Post by: Tylergal on November 28, 2006, 06:32:20 PM
Quote from: "blah"
Quote from: "AnnieMW1"
I wonder why DeVries is saying at this juncture that he thinks the case can be solved.


I think its like Beth said - start going after the people who helped with the cover-up but didnt actually participate in the crime against Natalee.  Put pressure on these folks and they will sing like birds.  People like Ben vocKING, Judge De Wit, JOHN CARLO, Karen Jansen.  Go after those that are involved in the cover-up and see if they are really willing to take the fall for these punks.


Not sure VocKing can sing without incriminating himself in some other activities.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #549 11/27 - 11/28/2006
Post by: MisGivings on November 28, 2006, 06:33:09 PM
Quote from: "Buckeye"
One more thought....maybe Joran was going to claim to have spent this New Years with Natalee...never thinking we would see the photo.....that would be worth $200.  :shock:



I am still waiting for Klass to photoshop the photo so it has Natalee either picking at his ears or eyes with her right hand.

Seriously though, folks, don't you just feel like something is about to come to a head here?
When I saw the little bit of tape with Joran hiding behind the door while DeVries asked him questions, I found myself saying, "damn, he did it, that little shit has played the whole island for a fool."
Maybe it is time to bring in the Cowboys to trample that fragile house of cards.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #549 11/27 - 11/28/2006
Post by: memphis on November 28, 2006, 06:33:54 PM
{SNIP}

Joe: What I make of it Martha is another individual trying to cash in on this tragedy this guy is a materialist, he’s a capitalist; he is someone is making money off of a false story. I spoke to Antonio Carlo the former lawyer for Joran; he made no such statement to the prosecutor and let me tell you this I’ve looked through every single document in this case. Every police report every prosecutors note there is no such document in this case. Every police report every prosecutors note there is no such document that supports any such claim and when you couple that with the fact that this individual didn’t even have the wherewithal to document these very important conversations Martha at the time they were going on and didn’t report that to law enforcement I mean it shows you his true motive. He’s trying to make his splash he is trying to get himself all over the news which is what people have done repeatedly in this case.
.....

What does this mean? If he is talking about De Vries, De Vries wasn't there at the time it was going on. Me thinks Joe didn't pay attention during his brief.  :lol:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #549 11/27 - 11/28/2006
Post by: Tylergal on November 28, 2006, 06:34:42 PM
Quote from: "shadow"
Quote from: "AZLady"
The picture might be Joran's attempt to create a trophy.  I think Daddy and Mommy took all of Joran's trophies away from him, not trusting that someone else might get a hold of them.  As we've read, psychopathic killers keep trophies of their conquests and looking at these trophies is how they relive and re-experience the event.  It's a very strong psychological compulsion.  I believe Joran is obsessed with Natalee.  He may make up other explanations, but I think the root of the thing is to re-create for himself a trophy that helps him relive the experience.  This trophy picture is an unusual pose and expression for Natalee, and his picture in the photo is unsmiling and back to Natalee, rather superior to her.  Joran is a very sick individual and we are seeing one aspect of that sickness in this photo.


I agree with you 100%

Evening Monkeys!

Truthseeker: Good post . . . IMO there was a party at the Sloot house and it was for Daddy and his cronies. Wonder if King, Schmid and Croes were there too?


The elders . . . . .the lamb became a goat. (Is that a scapegoat for the elders?)


Title: Lively Case Discussion #549 11/27 - 11/28/2006
Post by: Tylergal on November 28, 2006, 06:36:44 PM
Quote from: "memphis"
Quote from: "blah"
Quote from: "igsigs"
Q: IS KARIN JANSSEN A CRIMINAL?

Exhibit A from De Vries.
"Mr. Carlo said yeah I have to clear my conscience I can tell you that my client Joran has played a major role in the disappearance of Natalee Holloway and I want you to know that."

Exhibit B from De Vries.
Janssen response to De Vries per MF. "Janssen just answered some of the questions she was asked in writing by e-mail. She defended the program Opsporings Verzocht were the focus were not on Joran or the Kalpoe brothers but gave a broader look so it might trigger other information that had nothing to do with the suspects. She said she was personally involved and oversaw the production of the program. In the program there was no emphasis put on the size of the shoe or the shoe itself and how he got home and this is what Karin wanted. And she defended her decision. She wanted that the investigation to be as broad as possible and not focused on Joran and his friends."

A: YES![/color]


So i think we can assume that it was HER idea to use someone who looked, talked, and acting NOTHING like Joran to portray him.


I guess this means that we have to question everything KJ did. What about all the people she had arrested? Were they all distractions?  :shock:


Of course, that big blond cowgirl went in pistols blazing to arrest Johns & Jones, and curled up like a sick kitten when confronted by Paulus & Witt.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #549 11/27 - 11/28/2006
Post by: Tylergal on November 28, 2006, 06:37:40 PM
Quote from: "San"
Quote from: "klaasend"
I believe Beth and De Vries will be on another show tonight, not sure if it will be Fox.  I'll let you know when I find out.

Another one :shock:   Let me go oil my fingers :lol:


I love you, San, and you know you are one of our bestest monkeys.  Hugs to you again and again.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #549 11/27 - 11/28/2006
Post by: Tylergal on November 28, 2006, 06:38:08 PM
Quote from: "San"
I wonder if Joe Tacopina was in Rome for Tom Cruise's wedding :lol:


Surprised Greta was not there.  Is that not one of her Scientology brothers? :lol:  :lol:  :lol:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #549 11/27 - 11/28/2006
Post by: shadow on November 28, 2006, 06:38:20 PM
Quote from: "Tylergal"
Quote from: "shadow"
Quote from: "AZLady"
The picture might be Joran's attempt to create a trophy.  I think Daddy and Mommy took all of Joran's trophies away from him, not trusting that someone else might get a hold of them.  As we've read, psychopathic killers keep trophies of their conquests and looking at these trophies is how they relive and re-experience the event.  It's a very strong psychological compulsion.  I believe Joran is obsessed with Natalee.  He may make up other explanations, but I think the root of the thing is to re-create for himself a trophy that helps him relive the experience.  This trophy picture is an unusual pose and expression for Natalee, and his picture in the photo is unsmiling and back to Natalee, rather superior to her.  Joran is a very sick individual and we are seeing one aspect of that sickness in this photo.


I agree with you 100%

Evening Monkeys!

Truthseeker: Good post . . . IMO there was a party at the Sloot house and it was for Daddy and his cronies. Wonder if King, Schmid and Croes were there too?


The elders . . . . .the lamb became a goat. (Is that a scapegoat for the elders?)


Good interpretation Tylergirl . . .


Title: Lively Case Discussion #549 11/27 - 11/28/2006
Post by: memphis on November 28, 2006, 06:40:29 PM
Quote from: "Tylergal"
Of course, that big blond cowgirl went in pistols blazing to arrest Johns & Jones, and curled up like a sick kitten when confronted by Paulus & Witt.


Right, but I was thinking of Guido, the skinny kid, etc.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #549 11/27 - 11/28/2006
Post by: Buckeye on November 28, 2006, 06:41:20 PM
Part 2 of transcript from mtrules FOB

Other statements
 
Some months later Joran told Nova (Dutch Television) that Satish picked him up on the beach.
Another story Joran told the police was that he called Deepak, who then came with two dogs and raped and murdered Natalee. According to Joran he buried her at the Fisherman’s Huts. Deepak told the police the opposite, he said Joran didn’t kill Natalee but only raped her. When the police asked him for more information he simply replied with: ‘you’ll have to ask Joran, he’s a sick person’.
 
Joran’s shoes
 
When De Vries first heard about the story of the lost shoes of Joran he could imagine Joran didn’t find his shoes back. However, now that De Vries walked on the beach where Joran supposedly lost his shoes he thought it was really unlikely because the beach was so narrow and so close to the Fisherman’s Huts (were Joran was picked up later that night without his shoes). De Vries expressed Joran could pick up his shoes very easily within a minute.
 
But then where are Joran’s shoes now?
 
The Aruban police doesn’t believe Joran lost his shoes on the beach. Instead, they think Joran lost his shoes on purpose, not because there are traces of blood on them (which is suggested in the media) but because there would be an imprint of his shoes on Natalee. Without his shoes there wouldn’t be any evidence of the fact that the footprint on Natalee is his. When questioned Joran told the police he had shoe-size 14. However, when the police measured his feet he turned out to have size 10.
 
Other scenario
 
The Aruban police think Joran and Natalee didn’t go to the beach at all. Instead they think they went to Joran’s house. One reason why they focus on this scenario is because in one statement Joran told police that they were at his house at 1.40 am. However, they didn’t got out of the car but continued driving almost immediately. There is one more reason why the police think this scenario is more likely: a group of fisherman’s were fishing all night long near the fisherman’s huts but hadn’t seen anyone there.
 
Violent
 
Peter R. de Vries expresses the fact that Joran had been treated by a psychologist for violent behaviour against his brother. A friend of Joran also said Joran threw a wanderer in the water during carnival.
 
Incident
 
Joran told police Natalee asked him if he wanted to use some cocaine. Also came to light that Natalee used a lot of alcohol during her stay on Aruba. The night before her disappearance Natalee started drinking at 10 am and had to be carried back to her room by her roommates/friends that night. De Vries thinks it’s possible that the death of Natalee could’ve been an incident.  According to him Natalee could’ve succumbed under the influence of drugs and/or too much alcohol.
 
The Van der Sloot home
 
In this part of the program de Vries went to the house where Joran’s parents still live. Because no one is home he will try again later.
 
[Commercial break]
 
The Kalpoe home
 
In this part of the program de Vries went to the house where Deepak and Satish live. Deepak came to the door and told de Vries he doesn’t want to talk to him and that he has to go to his lawyer.
 
Deepak’s lawyer
 
Deepak’s lawyer tells de Vries that Joran first accuses Deepak of the disappearance of Natalee and then (when it’s proven that this isn’t the case) he accuses Deepak’s brother Satish. He did the same thing with the story about who picked him up on the beach at the night of Natalee’s disappearance. He also thinks Joran didn’t leave his shoes on the beach but lost them on purpose. He strengthens his arguments by adding that Joran was a very good actor in court where he cried several times followed by some very convincing moments.
 
Paul van der Sloot’s role
 
Peter says Joran could be innocent, otherwise he would’ve succumbed under pressure of the interrogations. However, the Aruban police think differently. They think Joran is a liar and got a lot of help from his dad: Paul van der Sloot. According to the program Joran’s dad could get a lot of investigation results because he worked at the tribunal at the time. He then passed on the information to Joran. This couldn’t be stopped because Joran was still underage and could be visited every day.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #549 11/27 - 11/28/2006
Post by: Anna on November 28, 2006, 06:43:12 PM
Quote from: "memphis"
Quote from: "Tylergal"
Of course, that big blond cowgirl went in pistols blazing to arrest Johns & Jones, and curled up like a sick kitten when confronted by Paulus & Witt.


Right, but I was thinking of Guido, the skinny kid, etc.



They arrest Guido and SandraK swears Natalee had sex on the beach with him on Friday night before she disappeared on Sunday.  Red herrings and an attempt to pretend Natalee was some how involved with all those young men while on her "week long" three days in Aruba.

Connecting her to ANY other male is good as it dilutes the fact that it was Joran and only Joran all along.

.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #549 11/27 - 11/28/2006
Post by: shadow on November 28, 2006, 06:43:28 PM
memphis
I had a chance to look at the postings by Daniel at FOB. The only thing I can gather iis that he knows why the photoshop photo was created and exists, but whether or not he knows based on facts, I have no idea. What was your take, did you get more from what he was saying?  Did I miss something?


Title: Lively Case Discussion #549 11/27 - 11/28/2006
Post by: bleachedblack on November 28, 2006, 06:44:59 PM
I think the photo was possibly to commemorate his involvement (for lack of a better word) with Natalee.  These guys, these PIMPS are used to posting pics and displaying EVERYTHING, from DK and Joran riding in a car
with 2 porn video's playing while someone(it appears ) took the pic from the backseat, to pics of Sanders and Joran dancing with a semiconscous girl between them,  to photos showing "axeman" the guy crouched in the field wearing gloves and holding an axe(remember that one?).  These guys are used to "commemorating"  every event......and if that event didn't exist , Joran created it. I am sure if there were a pic of Natalee in undress, and in some pic that could have been manipulated into a more "X" rated version of the 2 , then we might have seen a pic pf that instead. JMO


Title: Lively Case Discussion #549 11/27 - 11/28/2006
Post by: sharon on November 28, 2006, 06:45:05 PM
igsigs

Thanks! Interesting comment.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #549 11/27 - 11/28/2006
Post by: igsigs on November 28, 2006, 06:45:32 PM
Joran is the cocaine source?  Pffft...


Title: Lively Case Discussion #549 11/27 - 11/28/2006
Post by: Sue on November 28, 2006, 06:45:40 PM
Quote from: "memphis"
{SNIP}

Joe: What I make of it Martha is another individual trying to cash in on this tragedy this guy is a materialist, he’s a capitalist; he is someone is making money off of a false story. I spoke to Antonio Carlo the former lawyer for Joran; he made no such statement to the prosecutor and let me tell you this I’ve looked through every single document in this case. Every police report every prosecutors note there is no such document in this case. Every police report every prosecutors note there is no such document that supports any such claim and when you couple that with the fact that this individual didn’t even have the wherewithal to document these very important conversations Martha at the time they were going on and didn’t report that to law enforcement I mean it shows you his true motive. He’s trying to make his splash he is trying to get himself all over the news which is what people have done repeatedly in this case.
.....

What does this mean? If he is talking about De Vries, De Vries wasn't there at the time it was going on. Me thinks Joe didn't pay attention during his brief.  :lol:


Excuse me Im a bit fired up BUT... If the family and the FBI hasnt seen these FILES  how in the holy hell has Joe Piece of shit seen everything???????????


Title: Lively Case Discussion #549 11/27 - 11/28/2006
Post by: klaasend on November 28, 2006, 06:45:44 PM
Buckeye - thanks for bringing that over here.  I've added it to the De Vries show thread as well.  :wink:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #549 11/27 - 11/28/2006
Post by: memphis on November 28, 2006, 06:46:15 PM
{SNIP}

It’s just another instance where it’s just an act of desperation on Ms. Holloway’s part and we understand her desire to get this case resolved but I think if she did what Greta Van Susteren’s doing and the prosecutors for all that matter taking a broader look at this case. Looking at other areas other leads they’ve looked at Joran Van der Sloot up and down he is not involved in Natalee’s disappearance. The prosecutors have all but dropped their case against him. The lawsuit that Ms. Holloway filed against our client was dismissed in New York courts.

...

The bolded part explains why Greta tended to beleive Joran. What Joe thinks is much more important to her than what Beth thinks. Impartial??

Oh, and I am enraged that he so flipantly tries to discredit Beth. However, that must mean that Beth's appearance's are having an impact on American viewers. Joe is trying hard to counter that.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #549 11/27 - 11/28/2006
Post by: Buckeye on November 28, 2006, 06:48:46 PM
Quote from: "klaasend"
Buckeye - thanks for bringing that over here.  I've added it to the De Vries show thread as well.  :wink:


Got your back...you need to rest up...who knows what is around the corner. :wink:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #549 11/27 - 11/28/2006
Post by: San on November 28, 2006, 06:49:04 PM
Quote from: "Tylergal"
Quote from: "San"
I wonder if Joe Tacopina was in Rome for Tom Cruise's wedding :lol:


Surprised Greta was not there.  Is that not one of her Scientology brothers? :lol:  :lol:  :lol:

Even Tom gets on Greta's nerves :lol:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #549 11/27 - 11/28/2006
Post by: Anna on November 28, 2006, 06:49:17 PM
Quote from: "igsigs"
Joran is the cocaine source?  Pffft...



And deVries believed that?

Two posters have now stated, one of whom was Gunslinger last night, that one can not OD on cocaine by snorting it.  Does not combine with alcohol either.  So presence or absence of cocaine not likely to have contributed to her death but we knew that her death was not from her own doing anyway.

.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #549 11/27 - 11/28/2006
Post by: Anna on November 28, 2006, 06:52:22 PM
The WHOLE WORLD needs to see that photoshopped photo Joran had made.

It needs big coverage and should be on every MSM around.  ANyone send it to Drudge?  It's worth a try but THAT would do it.

.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #549 11/27 - 11/28/2006
Post by: shadow on November 28, 2006, 06:52:49 PM
Quote from: "bleachedblack"
I think the photo was possibly to commemorate his involvement (for lack of a better word) with Natalee.  These guys, these PIMPS are used to posting pics and displaying EVERYTHING, from DK and Joran riding in a car
with 2 porn video's playing while someone(it appears ) took the pic from the backseat, to pics of Sanders and Joran dancing with a semiconscous girl between them,  to photos showing "axeman" the guy crouched in the field wearing gloves and holding an axe(remember that one?).  These guys are used to "commemorating"  every event......and if that event didn't exist , Joran created it. I am sure if there were a pic of Natalee in undress, and in some pic that could have been manipulated into a more "X" rated version of the 2 , then we might have seen a pic pf that instead. JMO


I agree . . . IMO there was a video or some other kind of souvenir. It had to be destroyed, removed and all knowledge of it denied . . . he lost his real souvenir and had to procure another one. He is so sick!

BTW I love your avatar hair-do . . . gotta love the look. :)


Title: Lively Case Discussion #549 11/27 - 11/28/2006
Post by: igsigs on November 28, 2006, 06:54:36 PM
So...

Joran is violent..
Under treatment for mistreating brother...
Anita says Joran kicked his brothers...

Yet de Vries says the shoes are missing NOT because of blood but because of an IMPRINT ON NATALEE? WTF kind of line is that to draw?


Title: Lively Case Discussion #549 11/27 - 11/28/2006
Post by: memphis on November 28, 2006, 06:56:27 PM
Quote from: "memphis"
{SNIP}

It’s just another instance where it’s just an act of desperation on Ms. Holloway’s part and we understand her desire to get this case resolved but I think if she did what Greta Van Susteren’s doing and the prosecutors for all that matter taking a broader look at this case. Looking at other areas other leads they’ve looked at Joran Van der Sloot up and down he is not involved in Natalee’s disappearance. The prosecutors have all but dropped their case against him. The lawsuit that Ms. Holloway filed against our client was dismissed in New York courts.

...

The bolded part explains why Greta tended to beleive Joran. What Joe thinks is much more important to her than what Beth thinks. Impartial??

Oh, and I am enraged that he so flipantly tries to discredit Beth. However, that must mean that Beth's appearance's are having an impact on American viewers. Joe is trying hard to counter that.


Let me make that clearer. Joe and Greta are in bed together sotaspeak, and Joe is a scumbag!  :evil:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #549 11/27 - 11/28/2006
Post by: robots on November 28, 2006, 06:57:45 PM
Quote from: "memphis"
Quote from: "memphis"
{SNIP}

It’s just another instance where it’s just an act of desperation on Ms. Holloway’s part and we understand her desire to get this case resolved but I think if she did what Greta Van Susteren’s doing and the prosecutors for all that matter taking a broader look at this case. Looking at other areas other leads they’ve looked at Joran Van der Sloot up and down he is not involved in Natalee’s disappearance. The prosecutors have all but dropped their case against him. The lawsuit that Ms. Holloway filed against our client was dismissed in New York courts.

...

The bolded part explains why Greta tended to beleive Joran. What Joe thinks is much more important to her than what Beth thinks. Impartial??

Oh, and I am enraged that he so flipantly tries to discredit Beth. However, that must mean that Beth's appearance's are having an impact on American viewers. Joe is trying hard to counter that.


Let me make that clearer. Joe and Greta are in bed together sotaspeak, and Joe is a scumbag!  :evil:



JACKPOT


Title: Lively Case Discussion #549 11/27 - 11/28/2006
Post by: shadow on November 28, 2006, 06:58:39 PM
Quote from: "Sue"
Quote from: "memphis"
{SNIP}

Joe: What I make of it Martha is another individual trying to cash in on this tragedy this guy is a materialist, he’s a capitalist; he is someone is making money off of a false story. I spoke to Antonio Carlo the former lawyer for Joran; he made no such statement to the prosecutor and let me tell you this I’ve looked through every single document in this case. Every police report every prosecutors note there is no such document in this case. Every police report every prosecutors note there is no such document that supports any such claim and when you couple that with the fact that this individual didn’t even have the wherewithal to document these very important conversations Martha at the time they were going on and didn’t report that to law enforcement I mean it shows you his true motive. He’s trying to make his splash he is trying to get himself all over the news which is what people have done repeatedly in this case.
.....

What does this mean? If he is talking about De Vries, De Vries wasn't there at the time it was going on. Me thinks Joe didn't pay attention during his brief.  :lol:


Excuse me Im a bit fired up BUT... If the family and the FBI hasnt seen these FILES  how in the holy hell has Joe Piece of shit seen everything???????????


There was some mention on FOB discussion I re-read today from after the DeVries program and one of the things someone, and I can't quote because I don't remember and it was my first time to read there, but it was stated that important documents (my interpretation was related to the case) were stolen during the break-in at Joran's apt. Anyone else know anything about this . . . and WTF! Why would he have access to any of those documents, let alone copies of them. Got to be BS . . .


Title: Lively Case Discussion #549 11/27 - 11/28/2006
Post by: memphis on November 28, 2006, 06:59:23 PM
Thank you very much San for transcribing that!   :D


Title: Lively Case Discussion #549 11/27 - 11/28/2006
Post by: Buckeye on November 28, 2006, 07:02:00 PM
Quote from: "igsigs"
So...

Joran is violent..
Under treatment for mistreating brother...
Anita says Joran kicked his brothers...

Yet de Vries says the shoes are missing NOT because of blood but because of an IMPRINT ON NATALEE? WTF kind of line is that to draw?


Hmmmm and Guido's charge of "heavy battery".  Would like to see that statement...


Title: Lively Case Discussion #549 11/27 - 11/28/2006
Post by: igsigs on November 28, 2006, 07:02:51 PM
Quote from: "igsigs"
So...

Joran is violent..
Under treatment for mistreating brother...
Anita says Joran kicked his brothers...

Yet de Vries says the shoes are missing NOT because of blood but because of an IMPRINT ON NATALEE? WTF kind of line is that to draw?

ETA: ALE is saying that...not de Vries. One consistent theme throughout the investigation is that it was an accident. Not violence. I am not buying it.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #549 11/27 - 11/28/2006
Post by: AZLady on November 28, 2006, 07:03:16 PM
Quote from: "Buckeye"
One more thought....maybe Joran was going to claim to have spent this New Years with Natalee...never thinking we would see the photo.....that would be worth $200.  :shock:


Now, this could also be the thought process of a deranged psychopath like Joran.  Who knows what paths his mind has wandered.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #549 11/27 - 11/28/2006
Post by: bleachedblack on November 28, 2006, 07:04:49 PM
Quote from: "Anna"
Quote from: "igsigs"
Joran is the cocaine source?  Pffft...



And deVries believed that?

Two posters have now stated, one of whom was Gunslinger last night, that one can not OD on cocaine by snorting it.  Does not combine with alcohol either.  So presence or absence of cocaine not likely to have contributed to her death but we knew that her death was not from her own doing anyway.

.


I am not sure Gunslinger is totally correct. I am also not certain of the pharmacological vs physiological effects of the 2 substances but often people using cocaine can tolerate a higher alcohol intake before exhibiting signs and symptoms that intake.

I am also not so sure how important this knowledge of this cocaine use is.
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++

Added Danger:  Cocaethylene

Researchers have found that the human liver combines cocaine and alcohol and manufactures a third substance, cocaethylene, that intensifies cocaine's euphoric effects.  The mixture of cocaine and alcohol is the most common two-drug combination that results in drug-related death

http://www.focusas.com/Cocaine.html


Title: Lively Case Discussion #549 11/27 - 11/28/2006
Post by: truthseeker2 on November 28, 2006, 07:06:27 PM
Quote from: "Tylergal"
Quote from: "shadow"
Quote from: "AZLady"
The picture might be Joran's attempt to create a trophy.  I think Daddy and Mommy took all of Joran's trophies away from him, not trusting that someone else might get a hold of them.  As we've read, psychopathic killers keep trophies of their conquests and looking at these trophies is how they relive and re-experience the event.  It's a very strong psychological compulsion.  I believe Joran is obsessed with Natalee.  He may make up other explanations, but I think the root of the thing is to re-create for himself a trophy that helps him relive the experience.  This trophy picture is an unusual pose and expression for Natalee, and his picture in the photo is unsmiling and back to Natalee, rather superior to her.  Joran is a very sick individual and we are seeing one aspect of that sickness in this photo.


I agree with you 100%

Evening Monkeys!

Truthseeker: Good post . . . IMO there was a party at the Sloot house and it was for Daddy and his cronies. Wonder if King, Schmid and Croes were there too?


The elders . . . . .the lamb became a goat. (Is that a scapegoat for the elders?)


Or...a bleating goat...Joran talked.  Then recanted.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #549 11/27 - 11/28/2006
Post by: klaasend on November 28, 2006, 07:06:42 PM
San noticed something very interresting while watching and transcribing today's foxnews show with Beth, De Vries and Joe T.  They showed a segment of when Joran was released from detention and he was at his home.

Edited to add you can watch the video now here:  http://tinyurl.com/yamnrl


See the guy with the white t-shirt standing way in the background?

(http://i37.photobucket.com/albums/e82/klaasend2/j3.jpg)

Here is a closer look:

(http://i37.photobucket.com/albums/e82/klaasend2/j4.jpg)
Is it possible?  Could it be the same person?  Lorenzo?
 :shock:
(http://i37.photobucket.com/albums/e82/klaasend2/lorenzonew3.jpg)


Title: Lively Case Discussion #549 11/27 - 11/28/2006
Post by: Buckeye on November 28, 2006, 07:07:55 PM
from medley/jan on refugees

Claims an email from Greta today, in response to her asking for time for Carlo, etc..Greta welcomes feedback from the Sloots and has not gotten a return call from Carlo. She restates that she has told Beth and the public that she believes Joran and likes him.  

Don't know if it's true, but just so we know what's posted.  I really can't read there much...they post no info, just alot of MEAN.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #549 11/27 - 11/28/2006
Post by: memphis on November 28, 2006, 07:08:26 PM
Quote from: "bleachedblack"
I think the photo was possibly to commemorate his involvement (for lack of a better word) with Natalee.  These guys, these PIMPS are used to posting pics and displaying EVERYTHING, from DK and Joran riding in a car
with 2 porn video's playing while someone(it appears ) took the pic from the backseat, to pics of Sanders and Joran dancing with a semiconscous girl between them,  to photos showing "axeman" the guy crouched in the field wearing gloves and holding an axe(remember that one?).  These guys are used to "commemorating"  every event......and if that event didn't exist , Joran created it. I am sure if there were a pic of Natalee in undress, and in some pic that could have been manipulated into a more "X" rated version of the 2 , then we might have seen a pic pf that instead. JMO


Very good correlation! You're right, they do document and display everything.

IIRC, I think that picture of the guy with the axe was an album cover of some musician.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #549 11/27 - 11/28/2006
Post by: bleachedblack on November 28, 2006, 07:08:30 PM
Quote from: "shadow"
Quote from: "bleachedblack"
I think the photo was possibly to commemorate his involvement (for lack of a better word) with Natalee.  These guys, these PIMPS are used to posting pics and displaying EVERYTHING, from DK and Joran riding in a car
with 2 porn video's playing while someone(it appears ) took the pic from the backseat, to pics of Sanders and Joran dancing with a semiconscous girl between them,  to photos showing "axeman" the guy crouched in the field wearing gloves and holding an axe(remember that one?).  These guys are used to "commemorating"  every event......and if that event didn't exist , Joran created it. I am sure if there were a pic of Natalee in undress, and in some pic that could have been manipulated into a more "X" rated version of the 2 , then we might have seen a pic pf that instead. JMO


I agree . . . IMO there was a video or some other kind of souvenir. It had to be destroyed, removed and all knowledge of it denied . . . he lost his real souvenir and had to procure another one. He is so sick!

BTW I love your avatar hair-do . . . gotta love the look. :)


I totally agree that a video was made....the part i don't agree is that I think it still exists somewhere.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #549 11/27 - 11/28/2006
Post by: mishy on November 28, 2006, 07:09:23 PM
Quote from: "Anna"
Quote from: "igsigs"
Joran is the cocaine source?  Pffft...



And deVries believed that?

Two posters have now stated, one of whom was Gunslinger last night, that one can not OD on cocaine by snorting it.  Does not combine with alcohol either.  So presence or absence of cocaine not likely to have contributed to her death but we knew that her death was not from her own doing anyway.

.


Anna, this looks good on paper, but I rather think it is just wishful thinking. I do believe that you can OD on cocaine by snorting it...


Title: Lively Case Discussion #549 11/27 - 11/28/2006
Post by: Anna on November 28, 2006, 07:09:35 PM
Quote from: "shadow"
Quote from: "Sue"
Quote from: "memphis"
{SNIP}

Joe: What I make of it Martha is another individual trying to cash in on this tragedy this guy is a materialist, he’s a capitalist; he is someone is making money off of a false story. I spoke to Antonio Carlo the former lawyer for Joran; he made no such statement to the prosecutor and let me tell you this I’ve looked through every single document in this case. Every police report every prosecutors note there is no such document in this case. Every police report every prosecutors note there is no such document that supports any such claim and when you couple that with the fact that this individual didn’t even have the wherewithal to document these very important conversations Martha at the time they were going on and didn’t report that to law enforcement I mean it shows you his true motive. He’s trying to make his splash he is trying to get himself all over the news which is what people have done repeatedly in this case.
.....

What does this mean? If he is talking about De Vries, De Vries wasn't there at the time it was going on. Me thinks Joe didn't pay attention during his brief.  :lol:


Excuse me Im a bit fired up BUT... If the family and the FBI hasnt seen these FILES  how in the holy hell has Joe Piece of shit seen everything???????????


There was some mention on FOB discussion I re-read today from after the DeVries program and one of the things someone, and I can't quote because I don't remember and it was my first time to read there, but it was stated that important documents (my interpretation was related to the case) were stolen during the break-in at Joran's apt. Anyone else know anything about this . . . and WTF! Why would he have access to any of those documents, let alone copies of them. Got to be BS . . .



Somewhere, maybe in his interview to his big fan Greta Joran said he spent hours daily going over the files of the investigation.  Yes, he has them.  That is how he and Paulus have come up with what I have always called his designer lies, ones made to fit something or other they find in the files.

They have all of them.  Paulus could get them from his boss for one thing.  We even had Julia/Bon Dia claiming to have seen the ENTIRE dossier posting here.

Everyone has them except the family of the victim who must be kept out at all costs.

. :evil:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #549 11/27 - 11/28/2006
Post by: AZLady on November 28, 2006, 07:11:12 PM
Don't know if you can OD on cocaine by snorting it or not, but I do know a guy here killed his wife by forcing a fairly large amount of cocaine down her throat.  She had a heart attack on the bathroom floor and died.  Nasty, huh?


Title: Lively Case Discussion #549 11/27 - 11/28/2006
Post by: MuffyBee on November 28, 2006, 07:11:32 PM
Bleachedblack-I  too think there is a good chance a video was made.  And if it was made, I don't think it would be destroyed.  Even though it would be risky to keep it, I think the lure of having something like that would be too great to destroy it.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #549 11/27 - 11/28/2006
Post by: memphis on November 28, 2006, 07:12:10 PM
Quote from: "shadow"
Quote from: "bleachedblack"
I think the photo was possibly to commemorate his involvement (for lack of a better word) with Natalee.  These guys, these PIMPS are used to posting pics and displaying EVERYTHING, from DK and Joran riding in a car
with 2 porn video's playing while someone(it appears ) took the pic from the backseat, to pics of Sanders and Joran dancing with a semiconscous girl between them,  to photos showing "axeman" the guy crouched in the field wearing gloves and holding an axe(remember that one?).  These guys are used to "commemorating"  every event......and if that event didn't exist , Joran created it. I am sure if there were a pic of Natalee in undress, and in some pic that could have been manipulated into a more "X" rated version of the 2 , then we might have seen a pic pf that instead. JMO


I agree . . . IMO there was a video or some other kind of souvenir. It had to be destroyed, removed and all knowledge of it denied . . . he lost his real souvenir and had to procure another one. He is so sick!

BTW I love your avatar hair-do . . . gotta love the look. :)


I think this is significant. They do what they've always done.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #549 11/27 - 11/28/2006
Post by: bleachedblack on November 28, 2006, 07:12:25 PM
Quote from: "memphis"
Quote from: "bleachedblack"
I think the photo was possibly to commemorate his involvement (for lack of a better word) with Natalee.  These guys, these PIMPS are used to posting pics and displaying EVERYTHING, from DK and Joran riding in a car
with 2 porn video's playing while someone(it appears ) took the pic from the backseat, to pics of Sanders and Joran dancing with a semiconscous girl between them,  to photos showing "axeman" the guy crouched in the field wearing gloves and holding an axe(remember that one?).  These guys are used to "commemorating"  every event......and if that event didn't exist , Joran created it. I am sure if there were a pic of Natalee in undress, and in some pic that could have been manipulated into a more "X" rated version of the 2 , then we might have seen a pic pf that instead. JMO


Very good correlation! You're right, they do document and display everything.

IIRC, I think that picture of the guy with the axe was an album cover of some musician.


When I recall any of the pics turning out to be band members i seem to recall it in reference to pics of LVR? I can't recall at the moment....but the band guy had long dreads .........it will come back to me ......but you'll probably all be sleeping.  :lol:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #549 11/27 - 11/28/2006
Post by: Anna on November 28, 2006, 07:12:42 PM
Quote from: "mishy"
Quote from: "Anna"
Quote from: "igsigs"
Joran is the cocaine source?  Pffft...



And deVries believed that?

Two posters have now stated, one of whom was Gunslinger last night, that one can not OD on cocaine by snorting it.  Does not combine with alcohol either.  So presence or absence of cocaine not likely to have contributed to her death but we knew that her death was not from her own doing anyway.

.


Anna, this looks good on paper, but I rather think it is just wishful thinking. I do believe that you can OD on cocaine by snorting it...


I don't know Mishy.  One said you have to ingest it or smoke it, etc. That it would take an hour of solid snorting to take in enough to OD.  

I don't really know one way or the other but they both said it so perhaps it is not an easy thing to do?

.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #549 11/27 - 11/28/2006
Post by: Buckeye on November 28, 2006, 07:13:20 PM
Klaas and San

See the guy with the white t-shirt standing way in the background?

 :shock:  :shock:  :shock:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #549 11/27 - 11/28/2006
Post by: MuffyBee on November 28, 2006, 07:14:54 PM
This source says you can overdose from snorting cocaine:
http://www.camh.net/About_Addiction_Mental_Health/Drug_and_Addiction_Information/about_cocaine.html


Title: Lively Case Discussion #549 11/27 - 11/28/2006
Post by: San on November 28, 2006, 07:15:50 PM
Quote from: "Buckeye"
Klaas and San

See the guy with the white t-shirt standing way in the background?

 :shock:  :shock:  :shock:

Yes that's who we were referring to.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #549 11/27 - 11/28/2006
Post by: Anna on November 28, 2006, 07:16:17 PM
Quote from: "bleachedblack"
[I totally agree that a video was made....the part i don't agree is that I think it still exists somewhere.



I tend to think it still exists too BB despite probable instructions to destroy all copies.  One of them would secretly hold on to their copy.  Just the sort of thing that bunch would do.  Deepak would be my first guess as to who might have retained a copy since he had tremendous access to hard drives and copying equipment, etc.

.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #549 11/27 - 11/28/2006
Post by: shadow on November 28, 2006, 07:16:43 PM
Quote from: "bleachedblack"
Quote from: "shadow"
Quote from: "bleachedblack"
I think the photo was possibly to commemorate his involvement (for lack of a better word) with Natalee.  These guys, these PIMPS are used to posting pics and displaying EVERYTHING, from DK and Joran riding in a car
with 2 porn video's playing while someone(it appears ) took the pic from the backseat, to pics of Sanders and Joran dancing with a semiconscous girl between them,  to photos showing "axeman" the guy crouched in the field wearing gloves and holding an axe(remember that one?).  These guys are used to "commemorating"  every event......and if that event didn't exist , Joran created it. I am sure if there were a pic of Natalee in undress, and in some pic that could have been manipulated into a more "X" rated version of the 2 , then we might have seen a pic pf that instead. JMO


I agree . . . IMO there was a video or some other kind of souvenir. It had to be destroyed, removed and all knowledge of it denied . . . he lost his real souvenir and had to procure another one. He is so sick!

BTW I love your avatar hair-do . . . gotta love the look. :)


I totally agree that a video was made....the part i don't agree is that I think it still exists somewhere.


I actually believe/think it is possible that it still exists somewhere, but Joran no longer had access to it.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #549 11/27 - 11/28/2006
Post by: bleachedblack on November 28, 2006, 07:17:41 PM
Quote from: "MuffyBee"
Bleachedblack-I  too think there is a good chance a video was made.  And if it was made, I don't think it would be destroyed.  Even though it would be risky to keep it, I think the lure of having something like that would be too great to destroy it.


I absolutely agree! When I listen to any of Jorans interviews and he sounds as if he blames Natalee for what happened! I am sure he feels entitled to the video. He probably hasn't  had it in his possesion for a good long time and he is starting to miss the rush it gives him.....hence the Pic....the best he can do under the circumstances......


Title: Lively Case Discussion #549 11/27 - 11/28/2006
Post by: mishy on November 28, 2006, 07:18:10 PM
Quote from: "MuffyBee"
Bleachedblack-I  too think there is a good chance a video was made.  And if it was made, I don't think it would be destroyed.  Even though it would be risky to keep it, I think the lure of having something like that would be too great to destroy it.


Hi Muffy Bee....So good to see you!! And all the monkeys! I've been outta pocket for awhile...enjoying reading everybody's comments  :lol:  :lol:

I, too, wonder about a video...


Title: Lively Case Discussion #549 11/27 - 11/28/2006
Post by: LilPuma on November 28, 2006, 07:18:56 PM
News Alert:  Joe Tacopina and Julie Renfroe and the only two people not trying to exploit this tragedy.  They are not capitalists like everyone else.  They know the facts of the case better than anyone, including the prosecutor.  Unlike the prosecutor, Joe Tacopina has read each and every document in this case and is not a capitalist profiting from this tragedy.  He and he alone knows what the search warrant said.  Anyone telling you anything else is a liar.  Joran van der Sloot and his family have suffered immeasurably and there's no proof any of them ever in their lives did anything wrong.  Beth Twitty, pour soul whose angst we understand, is at the bottom of this and it's based on nothing.  NOTHING I tell ya!  They've overturned every grain of sand on that island and found NOTHING.  Nothing, I tell ya!  He's just a scared 17 year old whose life has been ruined by Beth and a bunch of Monkeys.   :roll:  :roll:  :roll:

Now Joe, go meet with your Milan partners to talk about your Sicilian clients.  Byeeeeeeeeee   Before ya go, Joe, does AHATA have to write another check or are you on retainer?  
 :wink:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #549 11/27 - 11/28/2006
Post by: shadow on November 28, 2006, 07:19:06 PM
Quote from: "Anna"
Quote from: "shadow"
Quote from: "Sue"
Quote from: "memphis"
{SNIP}

Joe: What I make of it Martha is another individual trying to cash in on this tragedy this guy is a materialist, he’s a capitalist; he is someone is making money off of a false story. I spoke to Antonio Carlo the former lawyer for Joran; he made no such statement to the prosecutor and let me tell you this I’ve looked through every single document in this case. Every police report every prosecutors note there is no such document in this case. Every police report every prosecutors note there is no such document that supports any such claim and when you couple that with the fact that this individual didn’t even have the wherewithal to document these very important conversations Martha at the time they were going on and didn’t report that to law enforcement I mean it shows you his true motive. He’s trying to make his splash he is trying to get himself all over the news which is what people have done repeatedly in this case.
.....

What does this mean? If he is talking about De Vries, De Vries wasn't there at the time it was going on. Me thinks Joe didn't pay attention during his brief.  :lol:


Excuse me Im a bit fired up BUT... If the family and the FBI hasnt seen these FILES  how in the holy hell has Joe Piece of shit seen everything???????????


There was some mention on FOB discussion I re-read today from after the DeVries program and one of the things someone, and I can't quote because I don't remember and it was my first time to read there, but it was stated that important documents (my interpretation was related to the case) were stolen during the break-in at Joran's apt. Anyone else know anything about this . . . and WTF! Why would he have access to any of those documents, let alone copies of them. Got to be BS . . .



Somewhere, maybe in his interview to his big fan Greta Joran said he spent hours daily going over the files of the investigation.  Yes, he has them.  That is how he and Paulus have come up with what I have always called his designer lies, ones made to fit something or other they find in the files.

They have all of them.  Paulus could get them from his boss for one thing.  We even had Julia/Bon Dia claiming to have seen the ENTIRE dossier posting here.

Everyone has them except the family of the victim who must be kept out at all costs.

. :evil:


That makes me sick . . .  :twisted:  :twisted:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #549 11/27 - 11/28/2006
Post by: Kat_Gram on November 28, 2006, 07:19:08 PM
Joe: What I make of it Martha is another individual trying to cash in on this tragedy this guy is a materialist, he’s a capitalist; he is someone is making money off of a false story.
Can only Joe make money ?
Plus, Devries is employed by the Network, don't they usually have contracts ? So, exactly how would he make more money than what he gets paid ? Joe is the one who gets paid per appearance. Or per lies.
And what was pious Joe wearing / An Armani suit ? Did Joe take a vow of perpetual poverty ?
That Joe is just a POS who is FOS.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #549 11/27 - 11/28/2006
Post by: AZLady on November 28, 2006, 07:19:26 PM
I agree.  I do think a copy of the video exists, but Joran does not have access to it.  Thus, his desire to create a new trophy.  Perhaps his weird mind thought that would also be a great book cover for his book. Hey, he doesn't think the way we do, that's for sure.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #549 11/27 - 11/28/2006
Post by: mishy on November 28, 2006, 07:20:03 PM
Quote from: "Anna"
Quote from: "mishy"
Quote from: "Anna"
Quote from: "igsigs"
Joran is the cocaine source?  Pffft...



And deVries believed that?

Two posters have now stated, one of whom was Gunslinger last night, that one can not OD on cocaine by snorting it.  Does not combine with alcohol either.  So presence or absence of cocaine not likely to have contributed to her death but we knew that her death was not from her own doing anyway.

.


Anna, this looks good on paper, but I rather think it is just wishful thinking. I do believe that you can OD on cocaine by snorting it...


I don't know Mishy.  One said you have to ingest it or smoke it, etc. That it would take an hour of solid snorting to take in enough to OD.  

I don't really know one way or the other but they both said it so perhaps it is not an easy thing to do?

.


Well, I think most combinations of drugs and alcohol can cause an overdose, especially if there were other things mixed with it, say, like GHB?


Title: Lively Case Discussion #549 11/27 - 11/28/2006
Post by: Sue on November 28, 2006, 07:20:37 PM
Quote from: "Buckeye"
from medley/jan on refugees

Claims an email from Greta today, in response to her asking for time for Carlo, etc..Greta welcomes feedback from the Sloots and has not gotten a return call from Carlo. She restates that she has told Beth and the public that she believes Joran and likes him.  

Don't know if it's true, but just so we know what's posted.  I really can't read there much...they post no info, just alot of MEAN.


If you read Greta wire you would know that she is Full of crap
Greta rarely remarks and if she does VERY brief


Title: Lively Case Discussion #549 11/27 - 11/28/2006
Post by: klaasend on November 28, 2006, 07:21:09 PM
(http://i37.photobucket.com/albums/e82/klaasend2/threadlock.jpg)


Title: Lively Case Discussion #549 11/27 - 11/28/2006
Post by: bleachedblack on November 28, 2006, 07:21:11 PM
Quote from: "San"
Quote from: "Buckeye"
Klaas and San

See the guy with the white t-shirt standing way in the background?

 :shock:  :shock:  :shock:

Yes that's who we were referring to.


Sorry San what pic are we lookin' at? I must have dozed off. :wink:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #549 11/27 - 11/28/2006
Post by: Buckeye on November 28, 2006, 07:21:33 PM
Quote from: "Sue"
Quote from: "Buckeye"
from medley/jan on refugees

Claims an email from Greta today, in response to her asking for time for Carlo, etc..Greta welcomes feedback from the Sloots and has not gotten a return call from Carlo. She restates that she has told Beth and the public that she believes Joran and likes him.  

Don't know if it's true, but just so we know what's posted.  I really can't read there much...they post no info, just alot of MEAN.


If you read Greta wire you would know that she is Full of crap
Greta rarely remarks and if she does VERY brief


Supposedly...it was a personal e mail.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #549 11/27 - 11/28/2006
Post by: shadow on November 28, 2006, 07:22:04 PM
Quote from: "bleachedblack"
Quote from: "MuffyBee"
Bleachedblack-I  too think there is a good chance a video was made.  And if it was made, I don't think it would be destroyed.  Even though it would be risky to keep it, I think the lure of having something like that would be too great to destroy it.


I absolutely agree! When I listen to any of Jorans interviews and he sounds as if he blames Natalee for what happened! I am sure he feels entitled to the video. He probably hasn't  had it in his possesion for a good long time and he is starting to miss the rush it gives him.....hence the Pic....the best he can do under the circumstances......


Yep . . . exactly. Sick and twisted and so his character. IMO of course.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #549 11/27 - 11/28/2006
Post by: MuffyBee on November 28, 2006, 07:22:47 PM
Hey there Mishy!  Great to see you.

I think some of these evil nutcases like to keep little keepsakes from their victims.  So many times I have read in articles that something from the victim or the crime scene was kept by rapists, murderers and such.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #549 11/27 - 11/28/2006
Post by: Sue on November 28, 2006, 07:22:51 PM
Quote from: "Buckeye"
Quote from: "Sue"
Quote from: "Buckeye"
from medley/jan on refugees

Claims an email from Greta today, in response to her asking for time for Carlo, etc..Greta welcomes feedback from the Sloots and has not gotten a return call from Carlo. She restates that she has told Beth and the public that she believes Joran and likes him.  

Don't know if it's true, but just so we know what's posted.  I really can't read there much...they post no info, just alot of MEAN.


If you read Greta wire you would know that she is Full of crap
Greta rarely remarks and if she does VERY brief


Supposedly...it was a personal e mail.


Well she has responded to me several times on this case in emails and it was very brief never more then 2 or 3 words.. she gets thousands of emails a day


Title: Lively Case Discussion #549 11/27 - 11/28/2006
Post by: mishy on November 28, 2006, 07:24:55 PM
Quote from: "MuffyBee"
This source says you can overdose from snorting cocaine:
http://www.camh.net/About_Addiction_Mental_Health/Drug_and_Addiction_Information/about_cocaine.html


A narcotics agent once told me that cocaine has a reverse tolerance...that you could snort $100 worth in one sitting one day and two d ays later, snort half that amount and die...Plus, the coke down there is probably in a much purer form than you could get most places in the states...or it could be laced with something deadly...


Title: Lively Case Discussion #549 11/27 - 11/28/2006
Post by: LilPuma on November 28, 2006, 07:25:06 PM
Quote from: "shadow"
Somewhere, maybe in his interview to his big fan Greta Joran said he spent hours daily going over the files of the investigation.  Yes, he has them.  That is how he and Paulus have come up with what I have always called his designer lies, ones made to fit something or other they find in the files.

They have all of them.  Paulus could get them from his boss for one thing.  We even had Julia/Bon Dia claiming to have seen the ENTIRE dossier posting here.

Everyone has them except the family of the victim who must be kept out at all costs.

. :evil:


That makes me sick . . .  :twisted:  :twisted:[/quote]

That's also probably why his stories changed over time.  More information would be given to Papasloot and he would tweak his lies.  He even made slight changes to his story in the short time between the airing of Prime Time and Greta's interview and those changes seem to relate to comments on message boards about what he said on Prime Time.   :roll:  But let's not forget that this is just a bunch of capitalists exploiting this poor tortured soul by the name of Joran van der Sloot, ruining his life over NOTHING, NOTHING!   :roll:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #549 11/27 - 11/28/2006
Post by: Florida on November 28, 2006, 07:25:19 PM
Quote from: "bleachedblack"
Quote from: "memphis"
Quote from: "bleachedblack"
I think the photo was possibly to commemorate his involvement (for lack of a better word) with Natalee.  These guys, these PIMPS are used to posting pics and displaying EVERYTHING, from DK and Joran riding in a car
with 2 porn video's playing while someone(it appears ) took the pic from the backseat, to pics of Sanders and Joran dancing with a semiconscous girl between them,  to photos showing "axeman" the guy crouched in the field wearing gloves and holding an axe(remember that one?).  These guys are used to "commemorating"  every event......and if that event didn't exist , Joran created it. I am sure if there were a pic of Natalee in undress, and in some pic that could have been manipulated into a more "X" rated version of the 2 , then we might have seen a pic pf that instead. JMO


Very good correlation! You're right, they do document and display everything.

IIRC, I think that picture of the guy with the axe was an album cover of some musician.


When I recall any of the pics turning out to be band members i seem to recall it in reference to pics of LVR? I can't recall at the moment....but the band guy had long dreads .........it will come back to me ......but you'll probably all be sleeping.  :lol:


Corey Taylor? (Slipknot)


Title: Lively Case Discussion #549 11/27 - 11/28/2006
Post by: MuffyBee on November 28, 2006, 07:26:52 PM
How would you know the strength of the coke you are getting?  And how do you know with what and how much it's been stepped on?  Also take into account each individuals reaction to drugs, which can greatly vary...


Title: Lively Case Discussion #549 11/27 - 11/28/2006
Post by: bleachedblack on November 28, 2006, 07:31:01 PM
Florida wrote;
Quote

Corey Taylor? (Slipknot)


I think you are right about that. I still can't remember what it was we were saying though. LOL  but at least you got the name.  I am so bad at keeping stuff but I wish I had saved the pic of the guy in the field with the axe. It was wierd, and very early before things started to disappear from tickle.com


Title: Lively Case Discussion #549 11/27 - 11/28/2006
Post by: San on November 28, 2006, 07:31:20 PM
Quote from: "bleachedblack"
Quote from: "San"
Quote from: "Buckeye"
Klaas and San

See the guy with the white t-shirt standing way in the background?

 :shock:  :shock:  :shock:

Yes that's who we were referring to.


Sorry San what pic are we lookin' at? I must have dozed off. :wink:

Bottom of page 43.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #549 11/27 - 11/28/2006
Post by: klaasend on November 28, 2006, 07:32:02 PM
Need to go pick up a pizza, brb - try not to get to page 50 before I get back, OK  :lol:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #549 11/27 - 11/28/2006
Post by: yapperz1 on November 28, 2006, 07:32:28 PM
Evening Monkeys

Wasn't Alex the guy in the pic with the axe?

I don't think the guy in white tshirt is Lorenzo


Title: Lively Case Discussion #549 11/27 - 11/28/2006
Post by: mishy on November 28, 2006, 07:34:04 PM
Quote from: "MuffyBee"
How would you know the strength of the coke you are getting?  And how do you know with what and how much it's been stepped on?  Also take into account each individuals reaction to drugs, which can greatly vary...


I think if you know your coke, you can tell if it's good, or pure by just sticking your finger in it and tasting it. And of course, by using it. I think experts can tell what it's been cut with by smell and taste also. But in South America, you can bet your bottom dollar that it is purer than anything you can get in Alabama or California, for that matter!

And yes, people have different brain chemistries that would influence the way they react to certain drugs as well as alcohol. That's why some are addicts and some are not...

Take sinus meds or benadryl, for example. It knocks most people out, but it wires others.

Take something for ADHD like ritalin...if you are a hyper person, it will slow you down, if you are not a hyper person, it'll have you bouncing against the walls...


Title: Lively Case Discussion #549 11/27 - 11/28/2006
Post by: bleachedblack on November 28, 2006, 07:35:06 PM
Quote from: "MuffyBee"
How would you know the strength of the coke you are getting?  And how do you know with what and how much it's been stepped on?  Also take into account each individuals reaction to drugs, which can greatly vary...


I have heard that the drugs that come to aruba in general are pretty potent, more so than by the time they reach say the US.  They start out more pure along the way get diluted....not always, when it doesn't get diluted and a drug shows up in uncut form is when overdoses occur.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #549 11/27 - 11/28/2006
Post by: nonesuche on November 28, 2006, 07:35:14 PM
Good to see you Muffy, good point too regarding the cocaine. The advent of crack has changed how cocaine is produced in terms of it's strength plus what they cut it with as well, which has caused many more deaths from cocaine than in earlier years - it's much more dangerous now.

I see FOB has had a field day over the cocaine mention in the PV, has any of that been clarified since I left earlier today? Meds is naive to think that a reporter like Greta isn't going to work her, since she opened her email blathering how she's friends with Anita? Of course Greta is going to be solicitious toward her.

Have any of you been watching SandraK's latest at FOB? I do think she's truly lost it finally, completely around the bend or is drinking heavily  :roll: she has viet vet in her swingers culture now as well ?  :roll:  :roll:  :roll: Someone must be hitting a nerve in them they are tossing tantrums right and left.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #549 11/27 - 11/28/2006
Post by: mishy on November 28, 2006, 07:35:26 PM
Quote from: "yapperz1"
Evening Monkeys

Wasn't Alex the guy in the pic with the axe?

I don't think the guy in white tshirt is Lorenzo


Hey Yapz, love your avatar...Great to see ya!

That guy in the white shirt looks pretty young, although he is really blurry...


Title: Lively Case Discussion #549 11/27 - 11/28/2006
Post by: Anna on November 28, 2006, 07:35:40 PM
Quote from: "mishy"
[
Well, I think most combinations of drugs and alcohol can cause an overdose, especially if there were other things mixed with it, say, like GHB?


This is what it says about OD by snorting:

In medical literature, there is a difference between a fatal and a lethal dose. A fatal dose causes death in 100% of the cases. A lethal dose causes death in 50% of the cases.

Some doctors estimate that 1.2 grams of cocaine, when used orally, and 750-800 milligrams, when used intravenously or by inhaling, is fatal. It is unknown how much cocaine is fatal when sniffed. (Source: Cocaine Vraagbaak, Federatie van Instellingen voor Alcohol en Drugs, 1986). A user sniffs 0.1-0.2 grams of cocaine, i.e., 2-4 lines a night.

The average lethal dose of intravenous use of cocaine is about 500 milligrams. That doesn't mean, however that a smaller dose is safe. An estimated lethal dose when sniffing cocaine is unknown. These doses are estimates.
--------

So it is possible and with unknown quantity.  

.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #549 11/27 - 11/28/2006
Post by: MuffyBee on November 28, 2006, 07:37:03 PM
That makes sense, BB.  Aruba would be closer to the source of drugs, and therefore possibly more pure, before they continue on the journey.  And then of course, I am wondering what effect it has when you may have had alcohol, had your drink spiked and who knows what else.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #549 11/27 - 11/28/2006
Post by: mishy on November 28, 2006, 07:37:19 PM
Quote from: "bleachedblack"
Quote from: "MuffyBee"
How would you know the strength of the coke you are getting?  And how do you know with what and how much it's been stepped on?  Also take into account each individuals reaction to drugs, which can greatly vary...


I have heard that the drugs that come to aruba in general are pretty potent, more so than by the time they reach say the US.  They start out more pure along the way get diluted....not always, when it doesn't get diluted and a drug shows up in uncut form is when overdoses occur.


Absolutely. And of course, drugs get stepped on not only to dilute them and prevent overdoses, but more often because the dealers are greedy and want to stretch it out as much as they can, thus making as much money as they possibly can...


Title: Lively Case Discussion #549 11/27 - 11/28/2006
Post by: mishy on November 28, 2006, 07:39:40 PM
Quote from: "nonesuche"
Good to see you Muffy, good point too regarding the cocaine. The advent of crack has changed how cocaine is produced in terms of it's strength plus what they cut it with as well, which has caused many more deaths from cocaine than in earlier years - it's much more dangerous now.

I see FOB has had a field day over the cocaine mention in the PV, has any of that been clarified since I left earlier today? Meds is naive to think that a reporter like Greta isn't going to work her, since she opened her email blathering how she's friends with Anita? Of course Greta is going to be solicitious toward her.

Have any of you been watching SandraK's latest at FOB? I do think she's truly lost it finally, completely around the bend or is drinking heavily  :roll: she has viet vet in her swingers culture now as well ?  :roll:  :roll:  :roll: Someone must be hitting a nerve in them they are tossing tantrums right and left.


Hello my nonesuche,

I haven't seen what's up with SK on FOB...can't stomach those sites, even  if I were able to gleen some useful information from it.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #549 11/27 - 11/28/2006
Post by: Anna on November 28, 2006, 07:40:15 PM
.
Natalee still didn't have enough money to buy cocaine.  Oh, that's right!  She was seen getting $10,000 from her ATM card, too.  She didn't have one of those either.

.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #549 11/27 - 11/28/2006
Post by: mishy on November 28, 2006, 07:42:31 PM
Quote from: "Anna"
.
Natalee still didn't have enough money to buy cocaine.  Oh, that's right!  She was seen getting $10,000 from her ATM card, too.  She didn't have one of those either.

.


Unless one of her friends saw her snorting cocaine, I think it's all just another bunch of crap...Have the monkeys discounted the date rape drug possibility?


Title: Lively Case Discussion #549 11/27 - 11/28/2006
Post by: nonesuche on November 28, 2006, 07:43:11 PM
Hi Mishy-

Well she's calling out Leslie and Klaas and all monkeys, it's a conspiracy again  :lol: but she's hauling out the tired refrain of sexual abuse against Natalee as well as the anorexia bit. I have to wonder if De Vries hasn't struck such a nerve with that group, they are grasping at every straw they can find and it is amusing to watch them hurl and hurl all the old tired refrains.

Med's fingers must be bleeding from robo-posting between FOB and RU  :lol:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #549 11/27 - 11/28/2006
Post by: Kat_Gram on November 28, 2006, 07:46:13 PM
Quote from: "Anna"
Quote from: "mishy"
[
Well, I think most combinations of drugs and alcohol can cause an overdose, especially if there were other things mixed with it, say, like GHB?


This is what it says about OD by snorting:

In medical literature, there is a difference between a fatal and a lethal dose. A fatal dose causes death in 100% of the cases. A lethal dose causes death in 50% of the cases.

Some doctors estimate that 1.2 grams of cocaine, when used orally, and 750-800 milligrams, when used intravenously or by inhaling, is fatal. It is unknown how much cocaine is fatal when sniffed. (Source: Cocaine Vraagbaak, Federatie van Instellingen voor Alcohol en Drugs, 1986). A user sniffs 0.1-0.2 grams of cocaine, i.e., 2-4 lines a night.

The average lethal dose of intravenous use of cocaine is about 500 milligrams. That doesn't mean, however that a smaller dose is safe. An estimated lethal dose when sniffing cocaine is unknown. These doses are estimates.
--------

So it is possible and with unknown quantity.  

.

So, a person would have to snort a sugar bowl full in one evening full to die from this ? If she was up dancing, when did all this take place ? And where ? And sez WHO ?


Title: Lively Case Discussion #549 11/27 - 11/28/2006
Post by: bleachedblack on November 28, 2006, 07:46:28 PM
Quote from: "nonesuche"
Hi Mishy-

Well she's calling out Leslie and Klaas and all monkeys, it's a conspiracy again  :lol: but she's hauling out the tired refrain of sexual abuse against Natalee as well as the anorexia bit. I have to wonder if De Vries hasn't struck such a nerve with that group, they are grasping at every straw they can find and it is amusing to watch them hurl and hurl all the old tired refrains.

Med's fingers must be bleeding from robo-posting between FOB and RU  :lol:


 :lol:   :lol:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #549 11/27 - 11/28/2006
Post by: Anna on November 28, 2006, 07:46:28 PM
Slipknot, famous for masks.  There was a photo of just a mask on a table and also one of somebody wearing one of the mask being lifted up by two other people.

(http://i15.photobucket.com/albums/a360/AnnaBlueSkies/Holloway/254zssg_th.jpg)


Title: Lively Case Discussion #549 11/27 - 11/28/2006
Post by: bleachedblack on November 28, 2006, 07:47:40 PM
Quote from: "Anna"
Slipknot, famous for masks.  There was a photo of just a mask on a table and also one of somebody wearing one of the mask being lifted up by two other people.

(http://i15.photobucket.com/albums/a360/AnnaBlueSkies/Holloway/254zssg_th.jpg)


Noooooooo, that guy dosen't ring a bell.  :shock:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #549 11/27 - 11/28/2006
Post by: SunFreak2 on November 28, 2006, 07:48:21 PM
Quote from: "LilPuma"


Now Joe, go meet with your Milan partners to talk about your Sicilian clients.  Byeeeeeeeeee   Before ya go, Joe, does AHATA have to write another check or are you on retainer?  
 :wink:


The Grease Factory is back in the picture again?  What can he do now? Try to sue De Vries?


Title: Lively Case Discussion #549 11/27 - 11/28/2006
Post by: Mere on November 28, 2006, 07:49:22 PM
Some sites I goggled for "cocaine overdose and death":

http://web4health.info/en/answers/add-cocaine-overdose.htm

http://www.recovery.org.uk/druginfo/index.html

http://www.drug-overdose.com/cocaine.htm

Still sick...so off to bed....be back later.... :)


Title: Lively Case Discussion #549 11/27 - 11/28/2006
Post by: bleachedblack on November 28, 2006, 07:53:22 PM
Was it just a rumor that Paulus had googled drugs alcohol on his computer?


Title: Lively Case Discussion #549 11/27 - 11/28/2006
Post by: memphis on November 28, 2006, 07:53:56 PM
Quote from: "bleachedblack"
Florida wrote;
Quote

Corey Taylor? (Slipknot)


I think you are right about that. I still can't remember what it was we were saying though. LOL  but at least you got the name.  I am so bad at keeping stuff but I wish I had saved the pic of the guy in the field with the axe. It was wierd, and very early before things started to disappear from tickle.com


I think I was thinking of Corey Taylor, but I think Yapperz is correct. She says guy with axe is Alex.

Dreadlocks guy that was often thought to be Lorenzo was Peter or Pieter something.  :?:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #549 11/27 - 11/28/2006
Post by: Buckeye on November 28, 2006, 07:54:00 PM
Posted today (#217 in Peter De Vries thread) on SM FP

#

Very, very well said Pearl. I was there on June 10th and 11th. They lied to us about everything, Julia Renfro told us the body was found and came to us crying that up until then she did not believe they really killed her. Julia believed the body had been found and had me call to confirm. I called the number she gave and they said yes, the body has been found. One hour later, we were told it was a rumor. Very strange.,,, The coverup went big time. I think it goes to the very top, Oduber knows what happened.

Comment by viet vet | November 28, 2006, 10:54 am


Title: Lively Case Discussion #549 11/27 - 11/28/2006
Post by: Anna on November 28, 2006, 07:54:13 PM
Quote from: "Kat_Gram"
[
.

So, a person would have to snort a sugar bowl full in one evening full to die from this ? If she was up dancing, when did all this take place ? And where ? And sez WHO ?[/quote]

I think a person can always be allergic to any substance but I just don't think this is what happened to her.  And think Joran is the source for this, not any of her friends.

.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #549 11/27 - 11/28/2006
Post by: Anna on November 28, 2006, 07:56:12 PM
Quote from: "bleachedblack"
Quote from: "Anna"
Slipknot, famous for masks.  There was a photo of just a mask on a table and also one of somebody wearing one of the mask being lifted up by two other people.

(http://i15.photobucket.com/albums/a360/AnnaBlueSkies/Holloway/254zssg_th.jpg)


Noooooooo, that guy dosen't ring a bell.  :shock:


He was on some of the early Zorpia sites, lol.

You may be thinking of the more civilized looking Brandon?  Long sort of blondish dread locks?


Title: Lively Case Discussion #549 11/27 - 11/28/2006
Post by: nonesuche on November 28, 2006, 07:56:44 PM
Quote from: "Buckeye"
Posted today (#217 in Peter De Vries thread) on SM FP

#

Very, very well said Pearl. I was there on June 10th and 11th. They lied to us about everything, Julia Renfro told us the body was found and came to us crying that up until then she did not believe they really killed her. Julia believed the body had been found and had me call to confirm. I called the number she gave and they said yes, the body has been found. One hour later, we were told it was a rumor. Very strange.,,, The coverup went big time. I think it goes to the very top, Oduber knows what happened.

Comment by viet vet | November 28, 2006, 10:54 am


which totally explains the meltdown at FOB of histrionics today IMO.......how does renfro live with knowing she played such an important part in denying these parents a decent burial for their daughter???


Title: Lively Case Discussion #549 11/27 - 11/28/2006
Post by: mishy on November 28, 2006, 07:58:19 PM
Quote from: "nonesuche"
Hi Mishy-

Well she's calling out Leslie and Klaas and all monkeys, it's a conspiracy again  :lol: but she's hauling out the tired refrain of sexual abuse against Natalee as well as the anorexia bit. I have to wonder if De Vries hasn't struck such a nerve with that group, they are grasping at every straw they can find and it is amusing to watch them hurl and hurl all the old tired refrains.

Med's fingers must be bleeding from robo-posting between FOB and RU  :lol:


 :lol:  :lol:  :lol:  :lol:

I can't imagine anyone thinking or buying that BS...Natalee...anorexic? Gimme a break!! Anyone who would believe that is certifiable, IMHO...


Title: Lively Case Discussion #549 11/27 - 11/28/2006
Post by: bleachedblack on November 28, 2006, 07:59:26 PM
memphis wrote;
Quote
I think I was thinking of Corey Taylor, but I think Yapperz is correct. She says guy with axe is Alex.


Yup Alex was the axeman's name, and he had posted the pic on his tickle site. Anyway, glad that's outa-the-way.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #549 11/27 - 11/28/2006
Post by: Shizaru on November 28, 2006, 07:59:27 PM
Joran is not the source, that was a transcribing mistake.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #549 11/27 - 11/28/2006
Post by: nonesuche on November 28, 2006, 08:00:41 PM
Hey I have an idea, we could start a new thread of Renfro lies and deceit, call it Bondia Bingo !!!!!!


Title: Lively Case Discussion #549 11/27 - 11/28/2006
Post by: Buckeye on November 28, 2006, 08:01:09 PM
Anna and bleachblack

The dred guy was Brandon P (something).  Klaas knows the full name.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #549 11/27 - 11/28/2006
Post by: yapperz1 on November 28, 2006, 08:02:00 PM
Quote from: "nonesuche"
Hey I have an idea, we could start a new thread of Renfro lies and deceit, call it Bondia Bingo !!!!!!



ROFLMAO  :!:  :!:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #549 11/27 - 11/28/2006
Post by: Kat_Gram on November 28, 2006, 08:02:07 PM
Quote from: "memphis"
Quote from: "bleachedblack"
Florida wrote;
Quote

Corey Taylor? (Slipknot)


I think you are right about that. I still can't remember what it was we were saying though. LOL  but at least you got the name.  I am so bad at keeping stuff but I wish I had saved the pic of the guy in the field with the axe. It was wierd, and very early before things started to disappear from tickle.com


I think I was thinking of Corey Taylor, but I think Yapperz is correct. She says guy with axe is Alex.

Dreadlocks guy that was often thought to be Lorenzo was Peter or Pieter something.  :?:

That guys name was Brandon Piet oh poop, same last name as one of the SG lawyers.
No Slipknot either.
Anyone have the Ebay thingie Leslie did ? I can check somehting out.
I did find a kingofdingaling, but no longer registered and was from Texas. No one in Germany or anywhere using joran.sloot@gmail.com either on Ebay .


Title: Lively Case Discussion #549 11/27 - 11/28/2006
Post by: Frijole on November 28, 2006, 08:03:23 PM
Quote from: "nonesuche"
Hey I have an idea, we could start a new thread of Renfro lies and deceit, call it Bondia Bingo !!!!!!


Or Bondia BS!?   :wink:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #549 11/27 - 11/28/2006
Post by: Buckeye on November 28, 2006, 08:03:27 PM
Quote from: "Shizaru"
Joran is not the source, that was a transcribing mistake.


Thanks Shizaru...I hung around for mtrules to clarify with dugo and HannieC...but I was tired of lurking...and started locking up.  We should probably post in the transcript area.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #549 11/27 - 11/28/2006
Post by: mishy on November 28, 2006, 08:03:48 PM
Quote from: "nonesuche"
Hey I have an idea, we could start a new thread of Renfro lies and deceit, call it Bondia Bingo !!!!!!


 :lol:  :lol:  :lol:  :lol:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #549 11/27 - 11/28/2006
Post by: Buckeye on November 28, 2006, 08:04:16 PM
Quote from: "Frijole"
Quote from: "nonesuche"
Hey I have an idea, we could start a new thread of Renfro lies and deceit, call it Bondia Bingo !!!!!!


Or Bondia BS!?   :wink:


Now...that one I'll play...bingo is getting old...


Title: Lively Case Discussion #549 11/27 - 11/28/2006
Post by: bleachedblack on November 28, 2006, 08:04:55 PM
:P   :P   :P
 http://tinyurl.com/ycpo9y


She insisted the reasons behind the guards' arrest had nothing to do with race.

"Locally there was never even a mention or a breath of concern that this was a racial issue nor a status issue," Renfro said.

As for Ann John's comments, they came from a mother grasping for an answer, Renfro said.

"What she's saying is there has to be a reason because she knows her son was not there," Renfro said.

"You just have to come up with something, because there really, really is no differentiation between the blacks and the whites here and the browns. ... Nobody gets preference in that regard."

Renfro said police arrested the black guards "because the three boys pointed their fingers at these two security guards, and they couldn't leave that out of the loop. There was no reason to believe the boys were lying."


Title: Lively Case Discussion #549 11/27 - 11/28/2006
Post by: klaasend on November 28, 2006, 08:06:55 PM
Quote from: "yapperz1"
Evening Monkeys

Wasn't Alex the guy in the pic with the axe?

I don't think the guy in white tshirt is Lorenzo

Alex

(http://i37.photobucket.com/albums/e82/klaasend2/alexxaxe1.jpg)


Title: Lively Case Discussion #549 11/27 - 11/28/2006
Post by: bleachedblack on November 28, 2006, 08:07:26 PM
Kat_Gram wrote;
Quote
That guys name was Brandon Piet oh poop, same last name as one of the SG lawyers.
No Slipknot either.


Pieterz or something like that .....


Title: Lively Case Discussion #549 11/27 - 11/28/2006
Post by: Florida on November 28, 2006, 08:07:33 PM
Who are these friends of Joran? And, where are they? Paintball?

(http://i20.photobucket.com/albums/b223/NYSusan/alexxaxe1-2.jpg)
Guy with the ax

(http://i20.photobucket.com/albums/b223/NYSusan/Alex-bottomright-Isaxguytopmiddl-2.jpg)
Could Ax guy be on bottom/right or top/middle...He's wearing a "Slipknot" shirt.

(http://i20.photobucket.com/albums/b223/NYSusan/Alex4-3.jpg)
Joran's friend Alex

(http://i20.photobucket.com/albums/b223/NYSusan/joran_at_cnccopy_processed1-2.jpg)
Is this Alex with Joran in C&C's?

(Remember the Barcadera seaport sighting...Car with blonde girl in bushes...
Guy with an ax... :? )


Title: Lively Case Discussion #549 11/27 - 11/28/2006
Post by: justinsmama on November 28, 2006, 08:07:36 PM
Quote from: "mishy"
Quote from: "Anna"
.
Natalee still didn't have enough money to buy cocaine.  Oh, that's right!  She was seen getting $10,000 from her ATM card, too.  She didn't have one of those either.

.


Unless one of her friends saw her snorting cocaine, I think it's all just another bunch of crap...Have the monkeys discounted the date rape drug possibility?


This monkey has not.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #549 11/27 - 11/28/2006
Post by: memphis on November 28, 2006, 08:08:42 PM
Quote from: "shadow"
memphis
I had a chance to look at the postings by Daniel at FOB. The only thing I can gather iis that he knows why the photoshop photo was created and exists, but whether or not he knows based on facts, I have no idea. What was your take, did you get more from what he was saying?  Did I miss something?


I agree - not based on facts, but he seems to be a logical person and not one to just post trash.

Just wondering if anyone had any ideas as to how he could come that conclusion and feel so sure about it. Maybe I'm just futilely trying to read his mind. I'll try to forget about it. He did say it wasn't a case-breaker.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #549 11/27 - 11/28/2006
Post by: klaasend on November 28, 2006, 08:08:58 PM
Quote from: "bleachedblack"
Was it just a rumor that Paulus had googled drugs alcohol on his computer?

No it's in the computer records statements.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #549 11/27 - 11/28/2006
Post by: bleachedblack on November 28, 2006, 08:09:44 PM
Quote from: "klaasend"
Quote from: "yapperz1"
Evening Monkeys

Wasn't Alex the guy in the pic with the axe?

I don't think the guy in white tshirt is Lorenzo

Alex

(http://i37.photobucket.com/albums/e82/klaasend2/alexxaxe1.jpg)


 Thanks Klaas now my mind can rest..... :lol:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #549 11/27 - 11/28/2006
Post by: San on November 28, 2006, 08:09:49 PM
Bill O'Reilly will be having something on NH after commercial.  Greta will be on.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #549 11/27 - 11/28/2006
Post by: memphis on November 28, 2006, 08:10:32 PM
Quote from: "bleachedblack"
memphis wrote;
Quote
I think I was thinking of Corey Taylor, but I think Yapperz is correct. She says guy with axe is Alex.


Yup Alex was the axeman's name, and he had posted the pic on his tickle site. Anyway, glad that's outa-the-way.


Sorry  :oops:   :wink:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #549 11/27 - 11/28/2006
Post by: klaasend on November 28, 2006, 08:11:01 PM
Quote from: "San"
Bill O'Reilly will be having something on NH after commercial.  Greta will be on.


Thanks San!!


Title: Lively Case Discussion #549 11/27 - 11/28/2006
Post by: justinsmama on November 28, 2006, 08:11:03 PM
Quote from: "nonesuche"
Hey I have an idea, we could start a new thread of Renfro lies and deceit, call it Bondia Bingo !!!!!!


LOL!


Title: Lively Case Discussion #549 11/27 - 11/28/2006
Post by: Ono on November 28, 2006, 08:12:19 PM
Quote from: "klaasend"
{snipped}

Joe: What I make of it Martha is another individual trying to cash in on this tragedy this guy is a materialist, he’s a capitalist; he is someone is making money off of a false story. I spoke to Antonio Carlo the former lawyer for Joran; he made no such statement to the prosecutor and let me tell you this I’ve looked through every single document in this case

hmmm....former?


 :shock: Wow! Good catch;  Also, what the hell is wrong with being a capitalist, Joey ???????????????????????????????????????????? You associate that with being a huckster? So Joey must be a socialist ? Evidently, de Vries has hit paydirt with daring to broadcast the truth and the wounded are screaming! Go de Vries! Let's have more of this!


Title: Lively Case Discussion #549 11/27 - 11/28/2006
Post by: SunFreak2 on November 28, 2006, 08:13:02 PM
Quote from: "Kat_Gram"

So, a person would have to snort a sugar bowl full in one evening full to die from this ? If she was up dancing, when did all this take place ? And where ? And sez WHO ?


I sincerely doubt that many people could afford a sugar bowl full of cocaine!!

Do you remember Len Bias, basketball player drafted for the NBA, died of an overdose of cocaine in 1986.  The hospital found traces of cocine in his urine.  The cocaine had sped up his heart that he died of a cardiac arrythmia.

Like it has been said before, it depends on the strength of the cocaine.  Most dealers cut the coke before they sell it.  Each successive dealer cuts the coke again.  That close to Columbia, I would think the coke would be relatively uncut - more pure.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #549 11/27 - 11/28/2006
Post by: bleachedblack on November 28, 2006, 08:14:01 PM
Quote from: "Florida"
Who are these friends of Joran? And, where are they? Paintball?

(http://i20.photobucket.com/albums/b223/NYSusan/alexxaxe1-2.jpg)
Guy with the ax

(http://i20.photobucket.com/albums/b223/NYSusan/Alex-bottomright-Isaxguytopmiddl-2.jpg)
Could Ax guy be on bottom/right or top/middle...He's wearing a "Slipknot" shirt.

(http://i20.photobucket.com/albums/b223/NYSusan/Alex4-3.jpg)
Joran's friend Alex

(http://i20.photobucket.com/albums/b223/NYSusan/joran_at_cnccopy_processed1-2.jpg)
Is this Alex with Joran in C&C's?

Axeman alex was one of the mutual friends on the tickle.com sites as I recall common between many of the pimps. Can't t tell if that is him in C+C's with Joran but I recall speculation about that pic as both he and Joran appeared to be wearing the same shirt, sporting same haircut ....were they up to one of their evil PIMP games?

(Remember the Barcadera seaport sighting...Car with blonde girl in bushes...
Guy with an ax... :? )


Title: Lively Case Discussion #549 11/27 - 11/28/2006
Post by: Ono on November 28, 2006, 08:14:01 PM
Quote from: "blah"
i missed Beth on Greta last night, what did she say about scared monkeys ?


She said she had a crush on Blah. 8)


Title: Lively Case Discussion #549 11/27 - 11/28/2006
Post by: nonesuche on November 28, 2006, 08:16:05 PM
Did ya'll just hear Greta?  :evil:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #549 11/27 - 11/28/2006
Post by: Shizaru on November 28, 2006, 08:16:50 PM
Quote from: "nonesuche"
Did ya'll just hear Greta?  :evil:


What did she say?


Title: Lively Case Discussion #549 11/27 - 11/28/2006
Post by: Kat_Gram on November 28, 2006, 08:17:24 PM
Quote from: "Ono"
Quote from: "blah"
i missed Beth on Greta last night, what did she say about scared monkeys ?


She said she had a crush on Blah. 8)

And Greta said that she likes Joran because she never had that kind of attention from any teenage boys before. They will marry soon.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #549 11/27 - 11/28/2006
Post by: klaasend on November 28, 2006, 08:17:46 PM
Quote from: "Shizaru"
Quote from: "nonesuche"
Did ya'll just hear Greta?  :evil:


What did she say?

She doesn't believe that Antonio Carlo would go the KJ with a guilty concience.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #549 11/27 - 11/28/2006
Post by: nonesuche on November 28, 2006, 08:18:51 PM
Quote from: "Shizaru"
Quote from: "nonesuche"
Did ya'll just hear Greta?  :evil:


What did she say?


someone correct me if I'm wrong in my read on this for I am not a greta fan......but she appeared to discount De Vries' contention regarding the Antonio Carlo event with Janssen? Of course her doubt stems from the fact she was unable to secure any time herself with Carlo?

If I'm correct on my read I do hope De Vries hears of this?


Title: Lively Case Discussion #549 11/27 - 11/28/2006
Post by: justinsmama on November 28, 2006, 08:19:06 PM
Quote from: "klaasend"
Quote from: "Shizaru"
Quote from: "nonesuche"
Did ya'll just hear Greta?  :evil:


What did she say?

She doesn't believe that Antonio Carlo would go the KJ with a guilty concience.


LOL! Well, we know how well Greta's judgement is, now don't we? Ya know what? I'm done with her.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #549 11/27 - 11/28/2006
Post by: nonesuche on November 28, 2006, 08:19:25 PM
Quote from: "Kat_Gram"
Quote from: "Ono"
Quote from: "blah"
i missed Beth on Greta last night, what did she say about scared monkeys ?


She said she had a crush on Blah. 8)

And Greta said that she likes Joran because she never had that kind of attention from any teenage boys before. They will marry soon.


 :lol:  :lol:  post of the day  :lol:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #549 11/27 - 11/28/2006
Post by: bleachedblack on November 28, 2006, 08:21:27 PM
Quote from: "nonesuche"
Quote from: "Shizaru"
Quote from: "nonesuche"
Did ya'll just hear Greta?  :evil:


What did she say?


someone correct me if I'm wrong in my read on this for I am not a greta fan......but she appeared to discount De Vries' contention regarding the Antonio Carlo event with Janssen? Of course her doubt stems from the fact she was unable to secure any time herself with Carlo?

If I'm correct on my read I do hope De Vries hears of this?


HAH, well that is an accurate truth meter......she couldn't get the interview-oops it's a lie.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #549 11/27 - 11/28/2006
Post by: SunFreak2 on November 28, 2006, 08:21:40 PM
Quote from: "bleachedblack"
memphis wrote;
Quote
I think I was thinking of Corey Taylor, but I think Yapperz is correct. She says guy with axe is Alex.


Yup Alex was the axeman's name, and he had posted the pic on his tickle site. Anyway, glad that's outa-the-way.


ALEXXX:
http://connect.tickle.com/profile/index.html?id=t3gxKBNNO4GSv-_8


Title: Lively Case Discussion #549 11/27 - 11/28/2006
Post by: IndyDan on November 28, 2006, 08:21:50 PM
You all are so good at reading and disecting down to the truth it's unbelievable.  I truly struggle to keep up.
A couple of things I'd like to comment on, it's becoming more and more obvious to me that KJ is well anchored in the coverup.  I always thought all along she was a little frustrated with the choker she was wearing but I'm convinced she is one of the key players in suppressing and hiding evidence.
The fact that she's totally ignored the family all this time speaks volumes.
Secondly, Joe Taco is laughable, he's such a media hound that thinks he's so above everyone he doesn't see that the large majority are laughing at his ignorance.  
Finally, I can't help but wonder why DeVries didn't interview Beth, I'm sure she could have provided him with enough information for a series.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #549 11/27 - 11/28/2006
Post by: San on November 28, 2006, 08:22:46 PM
Quote from: "Shizaru"
Quote from: "nonesuche"
Did ya'll just hear Greta?  :evil:


What did she say?

She doesn't think Joran was on the beach with Natalee.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #549 11/27 - 11/28/2006
Post by: memphis on November 28, 2006, 08:23:27 PM
I've got Greta pinned.
She is always going to side with Joe T.
She has too much at stake.
He is always on her show.
She depends on him.
They're in bed together.
Same reason she tends to believe Joran.

IMO


Title: Lively Case Discussion #549 11/27 - 11/28/2006
Post by: Kat_Gram on November 28, 2006, 08:24:30 PM
I am done with Gag-Me_Greta. And Fox. Even their stinkin web site.
I would watch a trial of Joran or any of them.
We all come from different backgrounds. Tyler said that Shakespeare
said let's kill all the lawyers.  
I did not know that. I thought it was a song by MoJo Nixon.
He did it at something I was at and everyone cheered.If you don't know who MoJo is, forget it. He is lewd, rude and crude .


Title: Lively Case Discussion #549 11/27 - 11/28/2006
Post by: Ono on November 28, 2006, 08:24:42 PM
Quote from: "truthseeker2"
Quote from: "Shizaru"
The crime scene was NOT the VDS home.  That is highly inconsistent with the evidence (text messages, polis car tape) and logic (2K have no motive to lie about dropoff point, ect).  IMO.


I guess if you buy into the text messages, or even if you consider the text messages as 'for real" I don't think they rule out the scene of the crime as being the VDS property.  The test messages could have been sent during the "first attempt to dispose of the body" as a cover.  

One thing I remember from the polis car tape was Deepak saying to Joran something about "your own father".  Earlier upthread there was a brief discussion about Joran procuring for someone else.  Could have been PVDS??  

If you followed any of the Shango/Simian, "Simian Says: June 26th, 2005 at 10:24 pm
The boy is no Ajax. He is too afraid of the consequences. He doesn’t want to be made a cafone.
The third act needs to be played and the cowboys will be heroes.
This is all a “lugubrious game" to them. They were all at the party and all of them are turning their heads.
One of them needs to be pinched. "

Look up "lugubrious game " and you will find this is a painting by Dali, one of sexual perversion and castration.  You can also find opinons of Dali's subconscious motives for this painting, some of which may just apply to PVDS as well.

Joran himself put them all at or outside his home when he did the interview with Greta.  Why?  He said they never got out of the car. Why?  Because he knew they may have been seen there, or at least the car was seen there?  Maybe ole Paulus was having his own little party while Mama Sloot was away.  With a few friends over, too.

If Paulus was the man seen at the blackjack table that night with the MB students and Joran, could it be possible that he selected Natalee for himself and Joran paid the K2's to drive him out to get her?  Weren't there some rumors about ATM's in the early morning hours?  The K2's may have already been paid drivers earlier, but more money would be needed for grave digging.

I think the possibility of the VDS home being the crime scene is as good as any.  But....who really knows?


IMO, yes, yes, and yes....I also agree with your hypothetical scenario/theory. Joran was the scout, the Kalperms the transportation, and well....you know the rest, when the cat's away, the mice/mouse will play.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #549 11/27 - 11/28/2006
Post by: justinsmama on November 28, 2006, 08:25:32 PM
BTW, I had NO ciggies today. Did not wear a patch, but used 4 pieces of 4 mg. nicotine gum. I'm not saying that I am quitting. I'm kind of taking it in little bits of time. Ran into a friend today. Asked him to smell my hair and tell me what was not there. He said "Grey?" LOL! Told him the grey was def still there, and that one cannot smell that color!


Title: Lively Case Discussion #549 11/27 - 11/28/2006
Post by: robots on November 28, 2006, 08:27:16 PM
GRETA SUCKS


Title: Lively Case Discussion #549 11/27 - 11/28/2006
Post by: robots on November 28, 2006, 08:28:04 PM
Quote from: "justinsmama"
BTW, I had NO ciggies today. Did not wear a patch, but used 4 pieces of 4 mg. nicotine gum. I'm not saying that I am quitting. I'm kind of taking it in little bits of time. Ran into a friend today. Asked him to smell my hair and tell me what was not there. He said "Grey?" LOL! Told him the grey was def still there, and that one cannot smell that color!


stopped smoking 2 years ago

been miserable ever since

<-CRANKY ROBOTS

i hate DOCTOR EVIL


Title: Lively Case Discussion #549 11/27 - 11/28/2006
Post by: San on November 28, 2006, 08:28:07 PM
Quote from: "robots"
GRETA SUCKS

First one to page 50 wins a prize.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #549 11/27 - 11/28/2006
Post by: robots on November 28, 2006, 08:29:10 PM
GREAT doesnt answer email with paragraphs

medley smedlely is a liar

is she related to the LIE FACTORY ????? :twisted:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #549 11/27 - 11/28/2006
Post by: nonesuche on November 28, 2006, 08:29:20 PM
IndyDan- Good read on Janssen for I do think you are correct, she chafed at times but she wore the party collar........her reward will come with the Hague when all of this dies down.

Memphis-
Joe T has been auditioning for his own gig with FOX for some time now, I do think that is his master plan but he has one serious problem, BOR seems to despise him. Good luck Joe T, BOT owns the ratings power with the execs at FOX  :wink: Greta remains the back-seat....

Justins-
Good for you, I can't wait to see your tree  :D


Title: Lively Case Discussion #549 11/27 - 11/28/2006
Post by: memphis on November 28, 2006, 08:29:56 PM
Who was the monkey that went to the hearing in New York?

They described to us the dynamics of what was going on.

Greta was there, JQK and Joe T.

This person described Greta as waving down Joe T. and motioning for him to come sit by her.

I'm not saying literally, but figuratively they are in bed together!


Title: Lively Case Discussion #549 11/27 - 11/28/2006
Post by: klaasend on November 28, 2006, 08:30:23 PM
(http://i37.photobucket.com/albums/e82/klaasend2/bingo2-1.gif)
(http://i37.photobucket.com/albums/e82/klaasend2/SlootHiding.jpg)


Title: Lively Case Discussion #549 11/27 - 11/28/2006
Post by: bleachedblack on November 28, 2006, 08:30:30 PM
Quote from: "SunFreak2"
Quote from: "bleachedblack"
memphis wrote;
Quote
I think I was thinking of Corey Taylor, but I think Yapperz is correct. She says guy with axe is Alex.


Yup Alex was the axeman's name, and he had posted the pic on his tickle site. Anyway, glad that's outa-the-way.


ALEXXX:
http://connect.tickle.com/profile/index.html?id=t3gxKBNNO4GSv-_8


OMG you are toooo good.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #549 11/27 - 11/28/2006
Post by: memphis on November 28, 2006, 08:32:20 PM
Hi IndyDan!

Good to see you. I agree with your assessment of KJ.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #549 11/27 - 11/28/2006
Post by: nonesuche on November 28, 2006, 08:32:54 PM
Klaas  :lol:  :lol:  :lol:  BINGO !!!!!!!!!!!!


Title: Lively Case Discussion #549 11/27 - 11/28/2006
Post by: justinsmama on November 28, 2006, 08:33:13 PM
JORAN.SKEERED!


Title: Lively Case Discussion #549 11/27 - 11/28/2006
Post by: Buckeye on November 28, 2006, 08:33:22 PM
San

Love your Xmas colors...for a brief time....you looked like me....



Did I win??


Title: Lively Case Discussion #549 11/27 - 11/28/2006
Post by: Carnut on November 28, 2006, 08:33:27 PM
Think Greta may be digging herself a bit of a hole.

Pretty sure DeVries says he has tape of Antonio admitting the consience meeting with KJ.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #549 11/27 - 11/28/2006
Post by: Kat_Gram on November 28, 2006, 08:33:32 PM
Well, I still smoke.
Went to hang my long coat up and hung it near some girls coat who came up to me and said " Could you please hang you coat up away from the rest of our coats, you smoke "
She was very polite and so was I.
..
I wanted to say somehting like this to her :
NEXT TIME YOU HAVE A BRONCHIAL INFECTION, COULD YOU PLEASE HACK UP A LUNG IN THE PRIVACY OF YOU OWN HOME ?
.
AND DON'T COME BACK HERE UNTIL AFTER YOU HAVE A DOCTORS
CERTIFICATE SAYING YOU ARE NOT CONTAGIOUS.
.
SHE CAME TO WORK AND SPREAD HER INFECTION TO AT LEAST FOUR OTHER WOMEN. ONE OF WHOM IS PREGGERS.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #549 11/27 - 11/28/2006
Post by: Buckeye on November 28, 2006, 08:34:21 PM
Klaas

Where is the animated curtain??


Title: Lively Case Discussion #549 11/27 - 11/28/2006
Post by: San on November 28, 2006, 08:34:22 PM
Quote from: "klaasend"
(http://i37.photobucket.com/albums/e82/klaasend2/bingo2-1.gif)
(http://i37.photobucket.com/albums/e82/klaasend2/SlootHiding.jpg)

JUMP


Title: Lively Case Discussion #549 11/27 - 11/28/2006
Post by: Carnut on November 28, 2006, 08:34:43 PM
Heck, for that matter apparently there exists a letter from KJ about the conversation. How does Greta answer that?


Title: Lively Case Discussion #549 11/27 - 11/28/2006
Post by: Kat_Gram on November 28, 2006, 08:34:48 PM
THAT WAS MY RANT OF THE DAY. I HUNG ON TO THAT ONE FOR HOURS.
WOW, DOES THAT FEEL GOOOOD


Title: Lively Case Discussion #549 11/27 - 11/28/2006
Post by: bleachedblack on November 28, 2006, 08:34:59 PM
Quote from: "Carnut"
Think Greta may be digging herself a bit of a hole.

Pretty sure DeVries says he has tape of Antonio admitting the consience meeting with KJ.


Now that would be good!!!!


Title: Lively Case Discussion #549 11/27 - 11/28/2006
Post by: nonesuche on November 28, 2006, 08:35:00 PM
Quote from: "Carnut"
Think Greta may be digging herself a bit of a hole.

Pretty sure DeVries says he has tape of Antonio admitting the consience meeting with KJ.


Car did De Vries say he had a tape? If so, I hope he goes after Greta calling him a liar on MSM and quickly !


Title: Lively Case Discussion #549 11/27 - 11/28/2006
Post by: WidgetTheMidget on November 28, 2006, 08:35:07 PM
Quote from: "Shizaru"
Quote from: "nonesuche"
Did ya'll just hear Greta?  :evil:


What did she say?


Thats She's On VanDer Sloots Payroll ................

 :roll:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #549 11/27 - 11/28/2006
Post by: klaasend on November 28, 2006, 08:35:16 PM
Quote from: "Buckeye"
Klaas

Where is the animated curtain??


Need to work on that  :wink:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #549 11/27 - 11/28/2006
Post by: San on November 28, 2006, 08:35:38 PM
Quote from: "Buckeye"
San

Love your Xmas colors...for a brief time....you looked like me....



Did I win??

Not yet.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #549 11/27 - 11/28/2006
Post by: memphis on November 28, 2006, 08:35:43 PM
Quote from: "bleachedblack"
Quote from: "SunFreak2"
Quote from: "bleachedblack"
memphis wrote;
Quote
I think I was thinking of Corey Taylor, but I think Yapperz is correct. She says guy with axe is Alex.


Yup Alex was the axeman's name, and he had posted the pic on his tickle site. Anyway, glad that's outa-the-way.


ALEXXX:
http://connect.tickle.com/profile/index.html?id=t3gxKBNNO4GSv-_8


OMG you are toooo good.


She is! How are you feeling SunFreak?


Title: Lively Case Discussion #549 11/27 - 11/28/2006
Post by: Carnut on November 28, 2006, 08:35:48 PM
It does appear that Joe T. is continuing to give lawyers a bad rep.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #549 11/27 - 11/28/2006
Post by: Kat_Gram on November 28, 2006, 08:35:53 PM
Quote from: "San"
Quote from: "klaasend"
(http://i37.photobucket.com/albums/e82/klaasend2/bingo2-1.gif)
(http://i37.photobucket.com/albums/e82/klaasend2/SlootHiding.jpg)

JUMP

IT ISN'T HIGH ENOUGH.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #549 11/27 - 11/28/2006
Post by: klaasend on November 28, 2006, 08:36:06 PM
(http://i37.photobucket.com/albums/e82/klaasend2/nowlocked.jpg)

Please move to LCD# 550

http://www.scaredmonkeys.net/viewtopic.php?t=593