Scared Monkeys Discussion Forum

Natalee Holloway => LCD Archive => Topic started by: klaasend on December 03, 2006, 10:06:08 AM



Title: Lively Case Discussion #553 12/3 - 12/4/2006
Post by: klaasend on December 03, 2006, 10:06:08 AM
You all know the rules

(http://i37.photobucket.com/albums/e82/klaasend2/InHonorofNatalee.jpg)


Title: Lively Case Discussion #553 12/3 - 12/4/2006
Post by: Kat_Gram on December 03, 2006, 11:12:46 AM
I edited this to make it cleaarer as to who asked and what the answer was. Now Ramm is not a lawyer, but he does know more than me in general terms about their laws.
Rammstein

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Questions from Kat, my answers are in red

How often are they granted this status ? Seldom
.
Do you see it as being a feasible method in this case ?

Highly unlikely, wouldn't know who would be a right candidate for it
.
I was thinking that the Kalpoes could be presented with this opportunity.
.
 I think as the case stands now that they are not possible candidates for becoming crown-witnesses
.
Let's face it, there is a lack of blood evidence or any other evidence in this case and the system in Aruba can't pick one of JVDS statements of the many conflicting stories he has told and decide, well, we'll go with this one because the rest of them are all lies.
.
 any statement has to be backed up by evidence, that is indeed the problem
At some point they have to go with what they have and if making an offer of lesser charges against the Kalpoes is a solution, is it possible ?
.
they will only go to trial if they have enough for a conviction. They will not make offers, our system does not allow that
.
They do this in Canada. Sometines it backfires and they find that they have made a deal with the devil

.
in order to get a conviction. making deals is almost impossible to backfire due to the immense restrictive nature of the law on crown-witnesses


Title: Lively Case Discussion #553 12/3 - 12/4/2006
Post by: Kat_Gram on December 03, 2006, 11:23:55 AM
I just needed to be first.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #553 12/3 - 12/4/2006
Post by: Florida on December 03, 2006, 11:26:33 AM
As Geraldo said: MALIGNANT INACTION......


Title: Lively Case Discussion #553 12/3 - 12/4/2006
Post by: 2NJSons_Mom on December 03, 2006, 11:27:48 AM
Will check back in a bit.  Have some things to get done.   8)


Title: Lively Case Discussion #553 12/3 - 12/4/2006
Post by: klaasend on December 03, 2006, 11:32:26 AM
The Nancy Grace skit on SNL is not available to view even though it looks like it is.  Maybe later today?

What "Nancy Grace" says at the end of that skit is something like this:

Now...I'm going to play my favorite game...."Where in the world is Joran van der Sloot"

That was all there was to it.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #553 12/3 - 12/4/2006
Post by: justinsmama on December 03, 2006, 11:37:21 AM
Quote from: "klaasend"
The Nancy Grace skit on SNL is not available to view even though it looks like it is.  Maybe later today?

What "Nancy Grace" says at the end of that skit is something like this:

Now...I'm going to play my favorite game...."Where in the world is Joran van der Sloot"

That was all there was to it.


Which is GOOD! SNL is (I think) up on issues. For them to bring the case into one of their routines is GOOD! Hope they do more (Joran's many lies?)!


Title: Lively Case Discussion #553 12/3 - 12/4/2006
Post by: mishy on December 03, 2006, 11:42:16 AM
Great idea, Justins!

Sorry you were sick, Memere, and glad you're feeling better now  :lol:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #553 12/3 - 12/4/2006
Post by: Lala'sMom on December 03, 2006, 11:43:26 AM
Good Morning Monkeys...the Christmas decorations are just lovely in the cage.  Just wondering...when we change cages does Klaas have to redecorate each time? :shock:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #553 12/3 - 12/4/2006
Post by: San on December 03, 2006, 11:51:48 AM
Quote from: "klaasend"
The Nancy Grace skit on SNL is not available to view even though it looks like it is.  Maybe later today?

What "Nancy Grace" says at the end of that skit is something like this:

Now...I'm going to play my favorite game...."Where in the world is Joran van der Sloot"

That was all there was to it.

 :lol: Thanks Klaas.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #553 12/3 - 12/4/2006
Post by: Lala'sMom on December 03, 2006, 11:53:17 AM
Since I seem to be talking to myself...just want all our monkeys that could be affected by the weather in the Midwest and other places to know we are thinking about them...I was wondering about our Snoop Dog and the others that live in those states affected.  Anyone know?  Help me out here, if I have numbers for any of them I will call and check on them.  What about Misgivings?  Would she be affected?


Title: Lively Case Discussion #553 12/3 - 12/4/2006
Post by: Mere on December 03, 2006, 12:01:08 PM
Quote from: "Lala'sMom"
Since I seem to be talking to myself...just want all our monkeys that could be affected by the weather in the Midwest and other places to know we are thinking about them...I was wondering about our Snoop Dog and the others that live in those states affected.  Anyone know?  Help me out here, if I have numbers for any of them I will call and check on them.  What about Misgivings?  Would she be affected?


Hi Lala's....don't know about Snoopy, but my St. Louis relative lost electricity and walked a mile to a coffee shop yesterday morning.... :D
think she said she had about three inches of ice on the ground....yuck....


Title: Lively Case Discussion #553 12/3 - 12/4/2006
Post by: Kat_Gram on December 03, 2006, 12:16:10 PM
MaMere Glad you are feeling better.
Here in the Frozen North we get plenty of bad weather sytems, never like it or get used to it.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #553 12/3 - 12/4/2006
Post by: Lala'sMom on December 03, 2006, 12:17:15 PM
Hey MeMere!  You look so lovely in your Santa hat...can you see under that big thing? :roll:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #553 12/3 - 12/4/2006
Post by: Mere on December 03, 2006, 12:23:21 PM
Quote from: "Lala'sMom"
Hey MeMere!  You look so lovely in your Santa hat...can you see under that big thing? :roll:


I'm sort of laid back today....looking out under that lovely hat....feel sort of sneaky....like no one really sees me.....have spent a lot of time trying to search Ruth Dijkhoff....there is nothing there so far....only an obit and quotes from BFN and SM.....though I think PVDS using a recently deceased person as an alibi is significant.... :?


Title: Lively Case Discussion #553 12/3 - 12/4/2006
Post by: Mere on December 03, 2006, 12:24:51 PM
Quote from: "Kat_Gram"
MaMere Glad you are feeling better.
Here in the Frozen North we get plenty of bad weather sytems, never like it or get used to it.


Hi Kat....I am as far North as I have ever been.....only vacations bring me any further....and that is in the summer....!


Title: Lively Case Discussion #553 12/3 - 12/4/2006
Post by: Lala'sMom on December 03, 2006, 12:25:09 PM
Well, you know what Shango says...One witness is no witness..although that isn't what he is saying here...it just seems to fit at the moment.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #553 12/3 - 12/4/2006
Post by: Mere on December 03, 2006, 12:29:22 PM
Quote from: "Lala'sMom"
Well, you know what Shango says...One witness is no witness..although that isn't what he is saying here...it just seems to fit at the moment.


You know...someone talked about the bank cameras recently...I do wonder how long a bank would keep their tapes....does anyone know...?
I would think there is cause to keep them to document the movement of money by each employee.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #553 12/3 - 12/4/2006
Post by: Kat_Gram on December 03, 2006, 12:29:23 PM
If Jossy has this tape with Dompig why didn't he share it with deVries ?
I haven't read the whole transcript as it isn't availbale, but doesn't that change some assumptions that were made in the program ?


Title: Lively Case Discussion #553 12/3 - 12/4/2006
Post by: nonesuche on December 03, 2006, 12:29:56 PM
Hi Everyone-

Just checking in before tunneling into the cookie dough, have a big order due tomorrow, and a website to finally get the bugs out of!

MeMere, I'm glad you are feeling better  :D Thanks for your email Lala's and I'll try to work on your request but unsure what kind of image would represent what you want? :?

Kat  - thanks for ramm's answers and your questions, all important to know. I still think there may be a smoking gun here, I also think we need to be patient like Dana begged us too yesterday. I'm gonna try to be.

Klaas the cage looks so festive, I'd put on a Santa hat but just gotta keep my butterfly, know you understand  :D

Everyone have a great day, me and da flour and da sugar gonna wrestle now  :lol:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #553 12/3 - 12/4/2006
Post by: Lala'sMom on December 03, 2006, 12:30:56 PM
Quote from: "Kat_Gram"
If Jossy has this tape with Dompig why didn't he share it with deVries ?
I haven't read the whole transcript as it isn't availbale, but doesn't that change some assumptions that were made in the program ?


Help me here...what exactly is on this tape?  I kept trying to find the discussion and must have missed it.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #553 12/3 - 12/4/2006
Post by: Lala'sMom on December 03, 2006, 12:32:01 PM
Quote from: "MeMere"
Quote from: "Lala'sMom"
Well, you know what Shango says...One witness is no witness..although that isn't what he is saying here...it just seems to fit at the moment.


You know...someone talked about the bank cameras recently...I do wonder how long a bank would keep their tapes....does anyone know...?
I would think there is cause to keep them to document the movement of money by each employee.


In the U.S. maybe, but on Aurba you can get pretty much anything done for a box of corn flakes. :roll:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #553 12/3 - 12/4/2006
Post by: Mere on December 03, 2006, 12:32:40 PM
Quote from: "nonesuche"
Hi Everyone-

Just checking in before tunneling into the cookie dough, have a big order due tomorrow, and a website to finally get the bugs out of!

MeMere, I'm glad you are feeling better  :D Thanks for your email Lala's and I'll try to work on your request but unsure what kind of image would represent what you want? :?

Kat  - thanks for ramm's answers and your questions, all important to know. I still think there may be a smoking gun here, I also think we need to be patient like Dana begged us too yesterday. I'm gonna try to be.

Klaas the cage looks so festive, I'd put on a Santa hat but just gotta keep my butterfly, know you understand  :D

Everyone have a great day, me and da flour and da sugar gonna wrestle now  :lol:


None....do you have a cookie shooter....?


Title: Lively Case Discussion #553 12/3 - 12/4/2006
Post by: Kat_Gram on December 03, 2006, 12:36:31 PM
Well, Ramm is not a lawyer. Just a Dutch citizen. But, he does study these things with this case. I would just hate to see no charges brought forward becasue of the mess the Dutch and Arubans made of this.
We have all discussed the errors, it would fill a whole thread.
Do you remember the beginning ? The first week or ten days of the events as they unfolded in real time ? It was obvious then.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #553 12/3 - 12/4/2006
Post by: Lala'sMom on December 03, 2006, 12:36:54 PM
Nonesy
Email coming your way...don't get lost in all that dough...I don't have a dough extractor handy.   :lol:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #553 12/3 - 12/4/2006
Post by: Kat_Gram on December 03, 2006, 12:39:11 PM
Jossy said he had a tape where Gerald Dompig says they have ?? evidence that all three had sex with Natalee... rape. Correct me, Memory.It is on Dana's interview with Jossy from Friday. Ppl have known about this, but it is the first I have heard of it.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #553 12/3 - 12/4/2006
Post by: Kat_Gram on December 03, 2006, 12:40:15 PM
Quote from: "Lala'sMom"
Nonesy
Email coming your way...don't get lost in all that dough...I don't have a dough extractor handy.   :lol:

A dough extractor ? Could I use that on my bum ?


Title: Lively Case Discussion #553 12/3 - 12/4/2006
Post by: klaasend on December 03, 2006, 12:41:38 PM
Need to run out for a bit, be back later!


Title: Lively Case Discussion #553 12/3 - 12/4/2006
Post by: LilPuma on December 03, 2006, 12:48:09 PM
Morning Monkeys!  
I have a Christmas kitty picture, but I don't know how to size it and code it for an avatar.  I also don't know how to not lose my waving kitty avatar.  I need help from computer literate monkeys!  


(http://i91.photobucket.com/albums/k304/LilPuma04/christmaskitty.jpg)


Title: Lively Case Discussion #553 12/3 - 12/4/2006
Post by: Mere on December 03, 2006, 12:52:16 PM
Quote from: "LilPuma"
Morning Monkeys!  
I have a Christmas kitty picture, but I don't know how to size it and code it for an avatar.  I also don't know how to not lose my waving kitty avatar.  I need help from computer literate monkeys!  


(http://i91.photobucket.com/albums/k304/LilPuma04/christmaskitty.jpg)


Just don't want you to think that no one hears you....but I did not graduate in computer stuff....although I do have my avatars saved....I do it before I change them.....Klaas will be back..... :D


Title: Lively Case Discussion #553 12/3 - 12/4/2006
Post by: Lala'sMom on December 03, 2006, 01:01:18 PM
Puma
Do you have a photobucket account?


Title: Lively Case Discussion #553 12/3 - 12/4/2006
Post by: LilPuma on December 03, 2006, 01:01:35 PM
Thanks, MeMere.  I saw that Klaas was going out, but I know we have some cyber-smart monkeys here.  

I'm glad to hear that Joran was mentioned on SNL!  He's becoming a household word in the U.S.   :lol:   With the Jensen and DeVries coverage, it could be that justice will be served even though the "system" thus far has failed.  

For those who missed it, Kimberly is going to have something on the case tonight on The Lineup, although probably just what we've already heard.  The promo mentioned Carlo's alleged comments to Janssen.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #553 12/3 - 12/4/2006
Post by: San on December 03, 2006, 01:01:35 PM
Quote from: "LilPuma"
Morning Monkeys!  
I have a Christmas kitty picture, but I don't know how to size it and code it for an avatar.  I also don't know how to not lose my waving kitty avatar.  I need help from computer literate monkeys!  


(http://i91.photobucket.com/albums/k304/LilPuma04/christmaskitty.jpg)

Try copying this link in the third line of your profile that says:

Link to off-site Avatar:

http://i34.photobucket.com/albums/d118/Sanddrops/LilPuma-christmaskitty.jpg


Title: Lively Case Discussion #553 12/3 - 12/4/2006
Post by: LilPuma on December 03, 2006, 01:02:21 PM
Quote from: "Lala'sMom"
Puma
Do you have a photobucket account?


Yes.  The pic is on photobucket.  That's how I copied it here.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #553 12/3 - 12/4/2006
Post by: San on December 03, 2006, 01:04:25 PM
Quote from: "LilPuma"
Thanks, MeMere.  I saw that Klaas was going out, but I know we have some cyber-smart monkeys here.  

I'm glad to hear that Joran was mentioned on SNL!  He's becoming a household word in the U.S.   :lol:   With the Jensen and DeVries coverage, it could be that justice will be served even though the "system" thus far has failed.  

For those who missed it, Kimberly is going to have something on the case tonight on The Lineup, although probably just what we've already heard.  The promo mentioned Carlo's alleged comments to Janssen.

Hopefully she will have someone on discussing Antonio Carlo's comments to KJ but also the tape like Jossy Mansur or Beth.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #553 12/3 - 12/4/2006
Post by: MsVada on December 03, 2006, 01:04:45 PM
lil puma

that christmas kitty is adorable.
 he looks like my big fat orange kitty.  If you haven't seen him,  There's a pic under our pets in the lounge :)


Title: Lively Case Discussion #553 12/3 - 12/4/2006
Post by: San on December 03, 2006, 01:07:19 PM
Quote from: "LilPuma"
Quote from: "Lala'sMom"
Puma
Do you have a photobucket account?


Yes.  The pic is on photobucket.  That's how I copied it here.

If you have Photobucket already just copy your URL link into the third option in your profile.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #553 12/3 - 12/4/2006
Post by: LilPuma on December 03, 2006, 01:07:55 PM
Quote from: "Ms.DarthVada"
lil puma

that christmas kitty is adorable.
 he looks like my big fat orange kitty.  If you haven't seen him,  There's a pic under our pets in the lounge :)


Thanks, San and Lala's; it seems to have worked.  Mrs. DarthVada, I'll take a look!  My real cat is happy nappy right now.   :)


Title: Lively Case Discussion #553 12/3 - 12/4/2006
Post by: Lala'sMom on December 03, 2006, 01:12:30 PM
Quote from: "LilPuma"
Quote from: "Lala'sMom"
Puma
Do you have a photobucket account?


Yes.  The pic is on photobucket.  That's how I copied it here.


Oh this is easy then...go into photobucket and choose that last line there under the photo that has the [IMG tags, brackets and all and just copy it and then paste it into your profile in the area at the bottom that says "link to off site avatar"  it may take you a few times but we will wait while you test it. just make sure you include the IMG tags with the brackets.

Try it, I will help you.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #553 12/3 - 12/4/2006
Post by: nonesuche on December 03, 2006, 01:12:57 PM
Quote from: "Kat_Gram"
Quote from: "Lala'sMom"
Nonesy
Email coming your way...don't get lost in all that dough...I don't have a dough extractor handy.   :lol:

A dough extractor ? Could I use that on my bum ?


oh Kat that made me BUST  :lol:  :lol:  :lol:  :lol:

by late tonight I will look like a walking doughbaby for sure, it makes such a mess ! (http://i86.photobucket.com/albums/k101/daisysistah/GIFS/smilies/girl/girl_haha.gif)

MeMere- these are all large cookies and I have to do it the old-fashioned way, cookiepress won't work but hey, it's what I get the bigger price for da custom cookies ! (http://i86.photobucket.com/albums/k101/daisysistah/GIFS/smilies/girl/viannen_10.gif)

I'll check my email Lala's !

I just put up a letter to santa from barbie, I'd swear she wears a tiara  :shock:  :lol:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #553 12/3 - 12/4/2006
Post by: Lala'sMom on December 03, 2006, 01:13:23 PM
Never mind...you sly kitty!!! :cry:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #553 12/3 - 12/4/2006
Post by: crazybabyborg on December 03, 2006, 01:18:32 PM
Hi Monkeys!

Just checking in for a minute.....got Christmas stuff to do.

I may have been dreaming, but did I hear on Fox last night that Joran's former atty was caught on tape saying he thought his client was involved with the disappearance of Nat?


Title: Lively Case Discussion #553 12/3 - 12/4/2006
Post by: LilPuma on December 03, 2006, 01:19:52 PM
Just took a peak at expatica.com to see if there was mention of DeVries.  I hoped there'd be some discussion by non-Dutch living there.  Didn't see anything about Holloway, but apparently their cracking down on some things:  
Amsterdam orders prostitution windows shut
30 November 2006

AMSTERDAM — A large amount of the window prostitution in Amsterdam's red light district will be shut down as the city council gets tougher on criminal activities.

Amsterdam City Council said investigations had revealed about one-third of the prostitution sector is allegedly involved in money laundering.

About 100 of the 350 prostitution windows in the Dutch capital's red-light district will be forced to close by the end of the year.

The operators of the sex windows can still appeal, however, against the city council's decision to withdraw their permits. A total of 33 permits were revoked.
 
Amsterdam introduced a new law in 2003 which made it possible to investigate the operational management in the sex industry.

The new law was designed to prevent authorities unintentionally supporting criminal activities by issuing permits and subsidies.

It is the first time that the city council has used the new regulations. Amsterdam now intends to investigate the rest of the city's sex industry, including its brothels.

Hotels, cafés and restaurants will also be investigated.

I wonder if any of this will rub off on Aruba investigating criminal activities behind the walls of legitimate businesses.  There was also mention of 3 Italian mafia members being arrested, an abandoned baby being inundated with gifts and cocaine found in the toilets in the Dutch parliament.  No so different from the US.   :lol:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #553 12/3 - 12/4/2006
Post by: crazybabyborg on December 03, 2006, 01:19:58 PM
Quote from: "Kat_Gram"
Quote from: "Lala'sMom"
Nonesy
Email coming your way...don't get lost in all that dough...I don't have a dough extractor handy.   :lol:

A dough extractor ? Could I use that on my bum ?


 :lol:  :lol:  Oh, I'll gladly pay full retail for one!!!


Title: Lively Case Discussion #553 12/3 - 12/4/2006
Post by: LilPuma on December 03, 2006, 01:22:26 PM
Quote from: "Lala'sMom"
Never mind...you sly kitty!!! :cry:


Hopefully, Klaas won't feel like we don't need her.   :shock:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #553 12/3 - 12/4/2006
Post by: San on December 03, 2006, 01:28:52 PM
Quote from: "crazybabyborg"
Hi Monkeys!

Just checking in for a minute.....got Christmas stuff to do.

I may have been dreaming, but did I hear on Fox last night that Joran's former atty was caught on tape saying he thought his client was involved with the disappearance of Nat?

De Vries said that Carlo had a meeting with Karin Janssen and he told her that he thought Joran had a major role in the disappearance of Natalee.  He also told her it was up to her to find the evidence.  De Vries went to Antonio Carlo's office with a hidden camera and Antonio Carlo was very nervous discussing the matter.  Carlo then denies that he went to KJ.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #553 12/3 - 12/4/2006
Post by: San on December 03, 2006, 01:32:28 PM
Now that I am thinking about it more Antonio Carlo seems to think there is evidence that can be found.  He is giving her a hint that something can be found and she has to investigate it and she is just ignoring what he is saying.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #553 12/3 - 12/4/2006
Post by: memphis on December 03, 2006, 01:37:55 PM
Quote from: "San"
Now that I am thinking about it more Antonio Carlo seems to think there is evidence that can be found.  He is giving her a hint that something can be found and she has to investigate it and she is just ignoring what he is saying.


Right San. That's how I see it. Not only is she "ignoring" it, but puts it in writing. She has to know the conversation wasn't something to put in writing.

Then, Carlo's office hires Paulus????


Title: Lively Case Discussion #553 12/3 - 12/4/2006
Post by: memphis on December 03, 2006, 01:38:33 PM
I really want to hear more about that.

Something is up.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #553 12/3 - 12/4/2006
Post by: LilPuma on December 03, 2006, 01:41:37 PM
Quote from: "memphis"
Quote from: "San"
Now that I am thinking about it more Antonio Carlo seems to think there is evidence that can be found.  He is giving her a hint that something can be found and she has to investigate it and she is just ignoring what he is saying.


Right San. That's how I see it. Not only is she "ignoring" it, but puts it in writing. She has to know the conversation wasn't something to put in writing.
Then, Carlo's office hires Paulus????


Makes me think she wanted to get something on Carlo rather than Joran.   :x


Title: Lively Case Discussion #553 12/3 - 12/4/2006
Post by: Lala'sMom on December 03, 2006, 01:46:36 PM
Quote from: "LilPuma"
Quote from: "Lala'sMom"
Never mind...you sly kitty!!! :cry:


Hopefully, Klaas won't feel like we don't need her.   :shock:


Never!  Who do you think taught me?  The Wise One herself. :wink:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #553 12/3 - 12/4/2006
Post by: Lala'sMom on December 03, 2006, 01:48:01 PM
Quote from: "memphis"
I really want to hear more about that.

Something is up.


Hi Memphis! Just doing some housecleaning and visiting with the monkeys today...hope you are well.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #553 12/3 - 12/4/2006
Post by: Katysmom on December 03, 2006, 01:49:51 PM
Quote from: "MeMere"
Quote from: "Lala'sMom"
Well, you know what Shango says...One witness is no witness..although that isn't what he is saying here...it just seems to fit at the moment.


You know...someone talked about the bank cameras recently...I do wonder how long a bank would keep their tapes....does anyone know...?
I would think there is cause to keep them to document the movement of money by each employee.


Sorry if this has already been answered; I just got here and am trying to catch up.  I live in a small town and I know our banks only keep their tapes for 24 hours.  I would assume it's different depending on the bank.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #553 12/3 - 12/4/2006
Post by: memphis on December 03, 2006, 01:52:11 PM
Quote from: "Lala'sMom"
Quote from: "memphis"
I really want to hear more about that.

Something is up.


Hi Memphis! Just doing some housecleaning and visiting with the monkeys today...hope you are well.


Hi Lalas! I should be getting other things done.  :?

I've been thinking too much lately. I need to run some stuff past you.  :wink:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #553 12/3 - 12/4/2006
Post by: Mere on December 03, 2006, 01:52:50 PM
Quote from: "Katysmom"
Quote from: "MeMere"
Quote from: "Lala'sMom"
Well, you know what Shango says...One witness is no witness..although that isn't what he is saying here...it just seems to fit at the moment.


You know...someone talked about the bank cameras recently...I do wonder how long a bank would keep their tapes....does anyone know...?
I would think there is cause to keep them to document the movement of money by each employee.


Sorry if this has already been answered; I just got here and am trying to catch up.  I live in a small town and I know our banks only keep their tapes for 24 hours.  I would assume it's different depending on the bank.


Thank you....I tried to find this on line but no luck....so I will ask one of our tellers tomorrow...though our banks are also in a small town... :)


Title: Lively Case Discussion #553 12/3 - 12/4/2006
Post by: Mere on December 03, 2006, 01:54:00 PM
memphis...can you email me....I do not seem to have your address....thanks..... :)


Title: Lively Case Discussion #553 12/3 - 12/4/2006
Post by: Lala'sMom on December 03, 2006, 01:54:26 PM
Memphis
Let's dance.  :wink:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #553 12/3 - 12/4/2006
Post by: memphis on December 03, 2006, 01:56:07 PM
Quote from: "MeMere"
memphis...can you email me....I do not seem to have your address....thanks..... :)


You like to do the tango?  :shock:

How safe is it to post an email addy?


Title: Lively Case Discussion #553 12/3 - 12/4/2006
Post by: Mere on December 03, 2006, 01:57:07 PM
Quote from: "memphis"
Quote from: "MeMere"
memphis...can you email me....I do not seem to have your address....thanks..... :)


You like to do the tango?  :shock:

How safe is it to post an email addy?


DON'T post an addy.....I will check with someone else if that is okay...


Title: Lively Case Discussion #553 12/3 - 12/4/2006
Post by: memphis on December 03, 2006, 01:59:32 PM
Quote from: "Lala'sMom"
Memphis
Let's dance.  :wink:


That thread we have in "documents" isn't the complete "collection". I just realized that. Do you know how to access Shango/Simian with all of the other posts?

.....

Also, do you think that Dirty Hand and DirtyHand might be the same and just a matter of not remembering how he typed it? There seems to be a difference b/t upper case and lower case, but I'm not sure about the other.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #553 12/3 - 12/4/2006
Post by: Tylergal on December 03, 2006, 01:59:47 PM
Totally OT, but where is Mrs. Red and what about Jacquie?  I need to know something about a movie poster.  I want a movie poster that is made of wood or that I can put onto wood that says, "it's a wonderful life" to place on my black wicker swing on my porch and put lights, garlands and red bows around it.  Need movie buff help.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #553 12/3 - 12/4/2006
Post by: klaasend on December 03, 2006, 01:59:50 PM
Nonesuche - been playing with your butterfly and can't get different colors, but was able to add this star: :wink:

(http://i37.photobucket.com/albums/e82/klaasend2/nonesuchexmasstar.gif)

http://i37.photobucket.com/albums/e82/klaasend2/nonesuchexmasstar.gif


Title: Lively Case Discussion #553 12/3 - 12/4/2006
Post by: Kat_Gram on December 03, 2006, 02:01:10 PM
I can't see them having it now. Unless then do they archive it out instead fo overwrite.
The shopping centre where I live keeps for 7 days, then overwrites are done.
In Aruba, there was a statement by Dompig, that, by the time Joran said he walked home, the street cams had been overwritten. So, it could not be proved or disproved. Probably the same with any activity around the Marriott.  
..
At the time, you would think that the street cams around the HI would have been checked. Maybe they were. It is just another thing that those
" investigators " did not seem to think about too much. They just let the lying suspects show them what their focus should be... the guards.
..
The first night that the HT were there, and I got this from Deepak's statements, Beth told Joran that the cameras at the Hi did not show Natalee being dropped off. These were the front desk cameras.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #553 12/3 - 12/4/2006
Post by: memphis on December 03, 2006, 02:01:28 PM
MeMere, I have a new memphis monkey yahoo email. Still not safe?


Title: Lively Case Discussion #553 12/3 - 12/4/2006
Post by: klaasend on December 03, 2006, 02:02:47 PM
Quote from: "Tylergal"
Totally OT, but where is Mrs. Red and what about Jacquie?  I need to know something about a movie poster.  I want a movie poster that is made of wood or that I can put onto wood that says, "it's a wonderful life" to place on my black wicker swing on my porch and put lights, garlands and red bows around it.  Need movie buff help.


You can get a poster from www.allposters.com but you will probably have to mount it on wood yourself.  They have several to choose from, this is my favorite:


(http://imagecache2.allposters.com/images/34/003_ITSAWONDSA.jpg)


Title: Lively Case Discussion #553 12/3 - 12/4/2006
Post by: Lala'sMom on December 03, 2006, 02:03:16 PM
Quote from: "MeMere"
Quote from: "memphis"
Quote from: "MeMere"
memphis...can you email me....I do not seem to have your address....thanks..... :)


You like to do the tango?  :shock:

How safe is it to post an email addy?


DON'T post an addy.....I will check with someone else if that is okay...


I have both of yours addys can I help be the go between?  That way no one else can see them.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #553 12/3 - 12/4/2006
Post by: Lala'sMom on December 03, 2006, 02:04:48 PM
Quote from: "memphis"
Quote from: "Lala'sMom"
Memphis
Let's dance.  :wink:


That thread we have in "documents" isn't the complete "collection". I just realized that. Do you know how to access Shango/Simian with all of the other posts?

.....

Also, do you think that Dirty Hand and DirtyHand might be the same and just a matter of not remembering how he typed it? There seems to be a difference b/t upper case and lower case, but I'm not sure about the other.


I think I can help you, give me a while and I will try to post the others.  Can I just add it to that thread,  Klaas?


Title: Lively Case Discussion #553 12/3 - 12/4/2006
Post by: Mere on December 03, 2006, 02:05:04 PM
Quote from: "memphis"
MeMere, I have a new memphis monkey yahoo email. Still not safe?


No...it's okay.....will make contact later...and thanks.... :)


Title: Lively Case Discussion #553 12/3 - 12/4/2006
Post by: San on December 03, 2006, 02:05:13 PM
Quote from: "memphis"
I really want to hear more about that.

Something is up.

I agree that something is up.

Karin Janssen went to the court hearing the other day so she can extend the investigation long enough so she can get out of town.  Now when this new prosecutor comes in he will be working with what she basically left in the files for him (which is nothing).  How will he know if there is evidence missing when he wasn't on the case from the beginning.  He will try and prosecute and he will come to court with a big blank.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #553 12/3 - 12/4/2006
Post by: Katysmom on December 03, 2006, 02:09:43 PM
HELP!!!!  I was trying to follow the directions given earlier for an avatar and really messed up!!   Can someone delete that huge pic for Me????  I've been trying off and on for months and just can't do it.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #553 12/3 - 12/4/2006
Post by: Kat_Gram on December 03, 2006, 02:10:14 PM
Is Karin leaving the prosecutors office in Aruba to go back to Holland where her substantive position was ? My understanding was she was in Aruba on a two or three year term and after that, you go back to where you came from. She is way too young to be retiring from working.
And, think she will Christmas on Aruba ? Probably do another week and then go back home.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #553 12/3 - 12/4/2006
Post by: Sue on December 03, 2006, 02:10:20 PM
Quote from: "Tylergal"
Totally OT, but where is Mrs. Red and what about Jacquie?  I need to know something about a movie poster.  I want a movie poster that is made of wood or that I can put onto wood that says, "it's a wonderful life" to place on my black wicker swing on my porch and put lights, garlands and red bows around it.  Need movie buff help.



If this doesnt link right to it
type in It's a wonderful like in search on this link

http://www.allposters.com/


Title: Lively Case Discussion #553 12/3 - 12/4/2006
Post by: Mere on December 03, 2006, 02:11:21 PM
Klaas...help needed.....see above..... :)


Title: Lively Case Discussion #553 12/3 - 12/4/2006
Post by: Kat_Gram on December 03, 2006, 02:11:25 PM
OMG what a precious girl ! !


Title: Lively Case Discussion #553 12/3 - 12/4/2006
Post by: crazybabyborg on December 03, 2006, 02:11:30 PM
Quote from: "San"
Quote from: "crazybabyborg"
Hi Monkeys!

Just checking in for a minute.....got Christmas stuff to do.

I may have been dreaming, but did I hear on Fox last night that Joran's former atty was caught on tape saying he thought his client was involved with the disappearance of Nat?

De Vries said that Carlo had a meeting with Karin Janssen and he told her that he thought Joran had a major role in the disappearance of Natalee.  He also told her it was up to her to find the evidence.  De Vries went to Antonio Carlo's office with a hidden camera and Antonio Carlo was very nervous discussing the matter.  Carlo then denies that he went to KJ.


San, you do a great summary! It was really late last night, and when I heard the "teaser" for a show tonight, I thought it was a newly made tape where he recently admitted that he thought Joran was involved. Thank you San!

What a wonderful idea Tyler!!!! I love it! THAT'S creative Christmas-ing!

Klaas............Ever thought about starting an online tutorial for Photoshop? I'll be your first enrollee!


Title: Lively Case Discussion #553 12/3 - 12/4/2006
Post by: Lala'sMom on December 03, 2006, 02:11:30 PM
Memphis
Which posts are you referring to...the later ones?  Or are you wanting all the other posters' comments that go with Simian and Shango?


Title: Lively Case Discussion #553 12/3 - 12/4/2006
Post by: nonesuche on December 03, 2006, 02:11:36 PM
Klaas !!!! THANK YOU I LOVE MY STAR !!!!!!!! (http://i86.photobucket.com/albums/k101/daisysistah/GIFS/smilies/girl/girl_in_love.gif)

Hey San  :D  hey CBB  :D

okay I have 20 cookies done and in the oven, off with that rolling pin I go again !!  :lol:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #553 12/3 - 12/4/2006
Post by: crazybabyborg on December 03, 2006, 02:14:18 PM
Quote from: "nonesuche"
Klaas !!!! THANK YOU I LOVE MY STAR !!!!!!!! (http://i86.photobucket.com/albums/k101/daisysistah/GIFS/smilies/girl/girl_in_love.gif)

Hey San  :D  hey CBB  :D

okay I have 20 cookies done and in the oven, off with that rolling pin I go again !!  :lol:


I Love that star too!

None, you da COOOOKIE Monster!  :wink:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #553 12/3 - 12/4/2006
Post by: Lala'sMom on December 03, 2006, 02:14:39 PM
CBB quote: Klaas............Ever thought about starting an online tutorial for Photoshop? I'll be your first enrollee!


Me too!  I am raising my hand teacher, please.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #553 12/3 - 12/4/2006
Post by: Katysmom on December 03, 2006, 02:16:30 PM
I went back in to my profile and found how to delete the huge pic.  Now, does anyone know how to make it small enough to be a avatar?  I've tried resizeing it and it turns out distorted.  Maybe naked is better in some cases!


Title: Lively Case Discussion #553 12/3 - 12/4/2006
Post by: San on December 03, 2006, 02:16:47 PM
Quote from: "nonesuche"
Klaas !!!! THANK YOU I LOVE MY STAR !!!!!!!! (http://i86.photobucket.com/albums/k101/daisysistah/GIFS/smilies/girl/girl_in_love.gif)

Hey San  :D  hey CBB  :D

okay I have 20 cookies done and in the oven, off with that rolling pin I go again !!  :lol:

Hi None :D .


Title: Lively Case Discussion #553 12/3 - 12/4/2006
Post by: crazybabyborg on December 03, 2006, 02:17:33 PM
Quote from: "Lala'sMom"
CBB quote: Klaas............Ever thought about starting an online tutorial for Photoshop? I'll be your first enrollee!


Me too!  I am raising my hand teacher, please.


Lala's and I won't even cheat off each others papers, and we'll always ask for a hall pass when we need to potty, won't we Lala's!?


Title: Lively Case Discussion #553 12/3 - 12/4/2006
Post by: klaasend on December 03, 2006, 02:17:55 PM
Quote from: "Katysmom"
HELP!!!!  I was trying to follow the directions given earlier for an avatar and really messed up!!   Can someone delete that huge pic for Me????  I've been trying off and on for months and just can't do it.


Katysmom - The picture needs to be the right size first, then it needs to be in a photobucket site.  If you want, you can email me the picture you want to use and I'll size it for you.

smklaasend@hotmail.com

Then, once you have your picture resized and in photobucket, you copy the link without the IMG tags and paste it in the THIRD option in your profile for avatars.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #553 12/3 - 12/4/2006
Post by: San on December 03, 2006, 02:19:38 PM
Quote from: "Katysmom"
I went back in to my profile and found how to delete the huge pic.  Now, does anyone know how to make it small enough to be a avatar?  I've tried resizeing it and it turns out distorted.  Maybe naked is better in some cases!


(http://i34.photobucket.com/albums/d118/Sanddrops/KatyysmomXmasEve2005MomKairi.jpg)


Title: Lively Case Discussion #553 12/3 - 12/4/2006
Post by: crazybabyborg on December 03, 2006, 02:20:45 PM
Quote from: "Katysmom"
I went back in to my profile and found how to delete the huge pic.  Now, does anyone know how to make it small enough to be a avatar?  I've tried resizeing it and it turns out distorted.  Maybe naked is better in some cases!


That I can do! .................Go to photobucket, my album, browse and upload the picture from your documents. When it's uploaded, select edit. Then select resize and choose the option for avatar.
Copy the url from the resized pic, and paste it in the third box in your profile.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #553 12/3 - 12/4/2006
Post by: San on December 03, 2006, 02:20:52 PM
Quote from: "San"
Quote from: "Katysmom"
I went back in to my profile and found how to delete the huge pic.  Now, does anyone know how to make it small enough to be a avatar?  I've tried resizeing it and it turns out distorted.  Maybe naked is better in some cases!


(http://i34.photobucket.com/albums/d118/Sanddrops/KatyysmomXmasEve2005MomKairi.jpg)

Oops sorry I see that Klaas is resizing it.  Please delete.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #553 12/3 - 12/4/2006
Post by: memphis on December 03, 2006, 02:22:31 PM
Quote from: "Lala'sMom"
Memphis
Which posts are you referring to...the later ones?  Or are you wanting all the other posters' comments that go with Simian and Shango?


Do you have them??

I don't want you to post all of that. Do I need them?  I thought I could access them throught the FP, but the archives only go back a year.

I also found the posts on BFN, and they were very easy to read. All of the Shano saids were removed.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #553 12/3 - 12/4/2006
Post by: Lala'sMom on December 03, 2006, 02:23:36 PM
Gosh!  We are such a funny bunch of monkeys today...I can always count on you guys to make me smile...{{{{{{{{{{{HUGS}}}}}}}}}}}


Title: Lively Case Discussion #553 12/3 - 12/4/2006
Post by: Tylergal on December 03, 2006, 02:23:48 PM
Thanks Klaas and Sue.  Klaas, I liked that one better that you had but the one I could get on wood that will be here by Christmas is not as pretty, so I ordered two.  I got the one that is on wood that just states It's a wonderful Life and I got the one you liked.  The board one is by K. Klaasen.

Thank you so much.  Monkeys know everything!


Title: Lively Case Discussion #553 12/3 - 12/4/2006
Post by: Katysmom on December 03, 2006, 02:25:23 PM
Quote from: "klaasend"
Quote from: "Katysmom"
HELP!!!!  I was trying to follow the directions given earlier for an avatar and really messed up!!   Can someone delete that huge pic for Me????  I've been trying off and on for months and just can't do it.


Katysmom - The picture needs to be the right size first, then it needs to be in a photobucket site.  If you want, you can email me the picture you want to use and I'll size it for you.

smklaasend@hotmail.com

Then, once you have your picture resized and in photobucket, you copy the link without the IMG tags and paste it in the THIRD option in your profile for avatars.


Thank you, Klaas.  The pic is on it's way to you.  You are a genius.  Someone give this woman a bonus!!! :D


Title: Lively Case Discussion #553 12/3 - 12/4/2006
Post by: crazybabyborg on December 03, 2006, 02:25:58 PM
KLAAS! Will you please, please answer just one Photoshop question for me? Maybe one a day for a life sentence, huh?

I can't do anything but lasso an image and move it to another, and then "background erase" until the unwanted edges are gone. That's so tedious! I know there has to be a way to only select the part you want to move to another image, right? Particularly when the image has that grey and white checkerboard as a background, or when the background is just a solid color. Can you "Tip of the day" me? I'm pressing "1" for English.  :lol:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #553 12/3 - 12/4/2006
Post by: Katysmom on December 03, 2006, 02:27:34 PM
Quote from: "San"
Quote from: "San"
Quote from: "Katysmom"
I went back in to my profile and found how to delete the huge pic.  Now, does anyone know how to make it small enough to be a avatar?  I've tried resizeing it and it turns out distorted.  Maybe naked is better in some cases!


(http://i34.photobucket.com/albums/d118/Sanddrops/KatyysmomXmasEve2005MomKairi.jpg)

Oops sorry I see that Klaas is resizing it.  Please delete.


Thank you Sans!  I know how busy Klaas is, and I have been putting off asking for her help, so this is really appreciated.  All the monkeys here are great; no one could ask for better friends!


Title: Lively Case Discussion #553 12/3 - 12/4/2006
Post by: klaasend on December 03, 2006, 02:27:45 PM
Quote from: "San"
Quote from: "San"
Quote from: "Katysmom"
I went back in to my profile and found how to delete the huge pic.  Now, does anyone know how to make it small enough to be a avatar?  I've tried resizeing it and it turns out distorted.  Maybe naked is better in some cases!


(http://i34.photobucket.com/albums/d118/Sanddrops/KatyysmomXmasEve2005MomKairi.jpg)

Oops sorry I see that Klaas is resizing it.  Please delete.


I just emailed her the link to your resized photo with instructions  :wink:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #553 12/3 - 12/4/2006
Post by: Sue on December 03, 2006, 02:28:29 PM
Quote from: "Tylergal"
Thanks Klaas and Sue.  Klaas, I liked that one better that you had but the one I could get on wood that will be here by Christmas is not as pretty, so I ordered two.  I got the one that is on wood that just states It's a wonderful Life and I got the one you liked.  The board one is by K. Klaasen.

Thank you so much.  Monkeys know everything!


Yw , I hope your project turns out..  :D


Title: Lively Case Discussion #553 12/3 - 12/4/2006
Post by: Lala'sMom on December 03, 2006, 02:28:46 PM
Memphis
I know who does.  Give me a minute.  At one time this person has all the FP stuff with Shango, let me see if I can them.  I will send them email.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #553 12/3 - 12/4/2006
Post by: Katysmom on December 03, 2006, 02:29:59 PM
test


Title: Lively Case Discussion #553 12/3 - 12/4/2006
Post by: klaasend on December 03, 2006, 02:30:04 PM
Quote from: "crazybabyborg"
KLAAS! Will you please, please answer just one Photoshop question for me? Maybe one a day for a life sentence, huh?

I can't do anything but lasso an image and move it to another, and then "background erase" until the unwanted edges are gone. That's so tedious! I know there has to be a way to only select the part you want to move to another image, right? Particularly when the image has that grey and white checkerboard as a background, or when the background is just a solid color. Can you "Tip of the day" me? I'm pressing "1" for English.  :lol:


Honestly, I'm still learning as well and I normally do it just like you do.  Sometimes, like in the case of Nonesuche's star, when it's a simple design that you simply want no background for, you can use the MAGIC WAND then erasing what you don't want is easier.

I really don't know many tricks.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #553 12/3 - 12/4/2006
Post by: crazybabyborg on December 03, 2006, 02:30:22 PM
Quote from: "Sue"
Quote from: "Tylergal"
Thanks Klaas and Sue.  Klaas, I liked that one better that you had but the one I could get on wood that will be here by Christmas is not as pretty, so I ordered two.  I got the one that is on wood that just states It's a wonderful Life and I got the one you liked.  The board one is by K. Klaasen.

Thank you so much.  Monkeys know everything!


Yw , I hope your project turns out..  :D


OMG, Sue, you need to be steering Santa's sleigh with those ears flying in the wind! That's the cutest pic I've ever seen !


Title: Lively Case Discussion #553 12/3 - 12/4/2006
Post by: Katysmom on December 03, 2006, 02:31:17 PM
Thank you soooooo much, San and Klaas!!!!!!!!!!  Do either of you do house cleaning, remodeling, laundry, grocery shopping??? :wink:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #553 12/3 - 12/4/2006
Post by: klaasend on December 03, 2006, 02:31:19 PM
Quote from: "crazybabyborg"
KLAAS! Will you please, please answer just one Photoshop question for me? Maybe one a day for a life sentence, huh?

I can't do anything but lasso an image and move it to another, and then "background erase" until the unwanted edges are gone. That's so tedious! I know there has to be a way to only select the part you want to move to another image, right? Particularly when the image has that grey and white checkerboard as a background, or when the background is just a solid color. Can you "Tip of the day" me? I'm pressing "1" for English.  :lol:


One other thing.  If you have already lasso'd the part you want you can simply copy and paste it.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #553 12/3 - 12/4/2006
Post by: klaasend on December 03, 2006, 02:31:48 PM
Quote from: "Katysmom"
Thank you soooooo much, San and Klaas!!!!!!!!!!  Do either of you do house cleaning, remodeling, laundry, grocery shopping??? :wink:


No, do you?  l :lol:  :lol:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #553 12/3 - 12/4/2006
Post by: Sue on December 03, 2006, 02:31:58 PM
Quote from: "crazybabyborg"
Quote from: "Sue"
Quote from: "Tylergal"
Thanks Klaas and Sue.  Klaas, I liked that one better that you had but the one I could get on wood that will be here by Christmas is not as pretty, so I ordered two.  I got the one that is on wood that just states It's a wonderful Life and I got the one you liked.  The board one is by K. Klaasen.

Thank you so much.  Monkeys know everything!


Yw , I hope your project turns out..  :D


OMG, Sue, you need to be steering Santa's sleigh with those ears flying in the wind! That's the cutest pic I've ever seen !


Well I dont have a sleigh to fly, so I guess I will stick to driving :) ty


Title: Lively Case Discussion #553 12/3 - 12/4/2006
Post by: memphis on December 03, 2006, 02:32:33 PM
Quote from: "Lala'sMom"
CBB quote: Klaas............Ever thought about starting an online tutorial for Photoshop? I'll be your first enrollee!


Me too!  I am raising my hand teacher, please.


LOL...I want Klaas and some others to hold internet sleuthing classes.  :D


Title: Lively Case Discussion #553 12/3 - 12/4/2006
Post by: Lala'sMom on December 03, 2006, 02:33:27 PM
Quote from: "Tylergal"
Thanks Klaas and Sue.  Klaas, I liked that one better that you had but the one I could get on wood that will be here by Christmas is not as pretty, so I ordered two.  I got the one that is on wood that just states It's a wonderful Life and I got the one you liked.  The board one is by K. Klaasen.

Thank you so much.  Monkeys know everything!



I want to see photos when it is finished.  Do we have a thread for Christmas in Monkey Land?   :roll:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #553 12/3 - 12/4/2006
Post by: Katysmom on December 03, 2006, 02:35:23 PM
Quote from: "klaasend"
Quote from: "Katysmom"
Thank you soooooo much, San and Klaas!!!!!!!!!!  Do either of you do house cleaning, remodeling, laundry, grocery shopping??? :wink:


No, do you?  l :lol:  :lol:


Only when absolutely neccessary! :lol:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #553 12/3 - 12/4/2006
Post by: klaasend on December 03, 2006, 02:36:23 PM
Quote from: "Katysmom"
Quote from: "klaasend"
Quote from: "Katysmom"
Thank you soooooo much, San and Klaas!!!!!!!!!!  Do either of you do house cleaning, remodeling, laundry, grocery shopping??? :wink:


No, do you?  l :lol:  :lol:


Only when absolutely neccessary! :lol:


Me too!   :lol:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #553 12/3 - 12/4/2006
Post by: crazybabyborg on December 03, 2006, 02:38:05 PM
Quote from: "klaasend"
Quote from: "crazybabyborg"
KLAAS! Will you please, please answer just one Photoshop question for me? Maybe one a day for a life sentence, huh?

I can't do anything but lasso an image and move it to another, and then "background erase" until the unwanted edges are gone. That's so tedious! I know there has to be a way to only select the part you want to move to another image, right? Particularly when the image has that grey and white checkerboard as a background, or when the background is just a solid color. Can you "Tip of the day" me? I'm pressing "1" for English.  :lol:


Honestly, I'm still learning as well and I normally do it just like you do.  Sometimes, like in the case of Nonesuche's star, when it's a simple design that you simply want no background for, you can use the MAGIC WAND then erasing what you don't want is easier.

I really don't know many tricks.


There's a smartass at work that selects one of the "mask" options that makes the "dancing ants" go around selected colors and then it moves cleanly; no edges. I'm sure there are steps I'm not relaying here, 'cause I can't do it. He's sooooo condesending that I hate to ask him anything, but the "help" options on Photoshop are over my head.
Klaas, can you help justins with her avatar? I tried but it was a pretty dismal effort........there's a candy cane in it that showed up pretty well, but I'm sure she would be better pleased if you did it. If it would be easier to take what I did and fix it, I'll post it for you, but you might find it easier to just start over. I tried, Justins!


Title: Lively Case Discussion #553 12/3 - 12/4/2006
Post by: crazybabyborg on December 03, 2006, 02:40:43 PM
(http://i25.photobucket.com/albums/c100/crazybabyborgs/Christmassleigh.jpg)


Klaas is gonna ban me from the cage................


Title: Lively Case Discussion #553 12/3 - 12/4/2006
Post by: memphis on December 03, 2006, 02:41:10 PM
MeMere - Thank you very much for that.

Lalas - I sent you 2 emails from my new addy. Let me know if you didn't get them.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #553 12/3 - 12/4/2006
Post by: crazybabyborg on December 03, 2006, 02:41:41 PM
Quote from: "crazybabyborg"
(http://i25.photobucket.com/albums/c100/crazybabyborgs/Christmassleigh.jpg)


Klaas is gonna ban me from the cage................


Sue???????? Now, wouldn't a little doggie be cute?


Title: Lively Case Discussion #553 12/3 - 12/4/2006
Post by: memphis on December 03, 2006, 02:42:56 PM
CBB you've got a great eye! I loved the package idea for MrsR. that you came up with too.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #553 12/3 - 12/4/2006
Post by: Sue on December 03, 2006, 02:43:13 PM
Quote from: "crazybabyborg"
Quote from: "crazybabyborg"
(http://i25.photobucket.com/albums/c100/crazybabyborgs/Christmassleigh.jpg)


Klaas is gonna ban me from the cage................


Sue???????? Now, wouldn't a little doggie be cute?


Yeah can we put Klaas to work on that  :wink:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #553 12/3 - 12/4/2006
Post by: crazybabyborg on December 03, 2006, 02:44:17 PM
Quote from: "memphis"
CBB you've got a great eye! I loved the package idea for MrsR. that you came up with too.


Well thx, memphis. Yeah, I'm good for creating work for Klaas!  :wink:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #553 12/3 - 12/4/2006
Post by: crazybabyborg on December 03, 2006, 02:46:44 PM
Sue, if Klaas is busy, I'll try, but me thinks you'll be happier if Klaas does it. Give it a minute or two, my money's on her to come through!


Title: Lively Case Discussion #553 12/3 - 12/4/2006
Post by: San on December 03, 2006, 02:51:20 PM
Quote from: "klaasend"
Quote from: "Katysmom"
Quote from: "klaasend"
Quote from: "Katysmom"
Thank you soooooo much, San and Klaas!!!!!!!!!!  Do either of you do house cleaning, remodeling, laundry, grocery shopping??? :wink:


No, do you?  l :lol:  :lol:


Only when absolutely neccessary! :lol:


Me too!   :lol:

Me three :lol:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #553 12/3 - 12/4/2006
Post by: crazybabyborg on December 03, 2006, 02:55:33 PM
Are we humming the "Jeoardy" ditty?

Do, Do Do Do, Do Do Doo, Do Do Do Do,DO, di dooty dooty..............


Title: Lively Case Discussion #553 12/3 - 12/4/2006
Post by: crazybabyborg on December 03, 2006, 02:57:18 PM
Quote from: "crazybabyborg"
Are we humming the "Jeoardy" ditty?

Do, Do Do Do, Do Do Doo, Do Do Do Do,DO, di dooty dooty..............


Jeoardy?  :shock:

Try Jeopardy! ( That may not be spelled right, either )


Title: Lively Case Discussion #553 12/3 - 12/4/2006
Post by: crazybabyborg on December 03, 2006, 03:02:13 PM
Sue, I'll get started, and assume, Klaas is working on Justins. ( God forbid she should be doing something in her own life!  :shock: ). But I'll keep checking back, and I'd bet you'll have it before I'm through. I'm NOT a quickie!  :lol:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #553 12/3 - 12/4/2006
Post by: Sue on December 03, 2006, 03:04:29 PM
Quote from: "crazybabyborg"
Sue, I'll get started, and assume, Klaas is working on Justins. ( God forbid she should be doing something in her own life!  :shock: ). But I'll keep checking back, and I'd bet you'll have it before I'm through. I'm NOT a quickie!  :lol:


thanks :lol:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #553 12/3 - 12/4/2006
Post by: klaasend on December 03, 2006, 03:05:25 PM
Quote from: "Sue"
Quote from: "crazybabyborg"
Quote from: "crazybabyborg"
(http://i25.photobucket.com/albums/c100/crazybabyborgs/Christmassleigh.jpg)


Klaas is gonna ban me from the cage................


Sue???????? Now, wouldn't a little doggie be cute?


Yeah can we put Klaas to work on that  :wink:


I'm on it!  In the mean time here's what I did with Justins

(http://i37.photobucket.com/albums/e82/klaasend2/justinsmom2006xmas.gif)

http://i37.photobucket.com/albums/e82/klaasend2/justinsmom2006xmas.gif


Title: Lively Case Discussion #553 12/3 - 12/4/2006
Post by: crazybabyborg on December 03, 2006, 03:12:41 PM
AHA!!!!!

SOOOOOOOOOOO Much Better!!!!

Klaas, YOU ROCK!


Title: Lively Case Discussion #553 12/3 - 12/4/2006
Post by: Lala'sMom on December 03, 2006, 03:17:58 PM
It's beginning to look a lot like Christmas....in the monkey cage.  :wink:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #553 12/3 - 12/4/2006
Post by: Anna on December 03, 2006, 03:22:12 PM
Quote from: "Kat_Gram"
Is Karin leaving the prosecutors office in Aruba to go back to Holland where her substantive position was ? My understanding was she was in Aruba on a two or three year term and after that, you go back to where you came from. She is way too young to be retiring from working.
And, think she will Christmas on Aruba ? Probably do another week and then go back home.


(http://i15.photobucket.com/albums/a360/AnnaBlueSkies/Greetings/thsunday.jpg)
Good Afternoon, Monkeys,

KatGram,
Do we know how old she is?  It's hard to tell as they seem to wrinkle up fast in that sun but I would guess mid to late fifties?

Anyone know?

I am reading backwards so it will make all my posts appear out of no where as usual.

 :D


Title: Lively Case Discussion #553 12/3 - 12/4/2006
Post by: klaasend on December 03, 2006, 03:23:28 PM
Sue  :lol:

(http://i37.photobucket.com/albums/e82/klaasend2/SueXmas.gif)

http://i37.photobucket.com/albums/e82/klaasend2/SueXmas.gif


Title: Lively Case Discussion #553 12/3 - 12/4/2006
Post by: Sue on December 03, 2006, 03:26:23 PM
test


Title: Lively Case Discussion #553 12/3 - 12/4/2006
Post by: Sue on December 03, 2006, 03:26:59 PM
WOOOOOOOOOOO HOOOOOOOOOOOOO

thank You Klaas that is great  :lol:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #553 12/3 - 12/4/2006
Post by: crazybabyborg on December 03, 2006, 03:30:07 PM
Klaas....you are so good!

Whew.........


Title: Lively Case Discussion #553 12/3 - 12/4/2006
Post by: Anna on December 03, 2006, 03:30:45 PM
Quote from: "San"
Quote from: "memphis"
I really want to hear more about that.

Something is up.

I agree that something is up.

Karin Janssen went to the court hearing the other day so she can extend the investigation long enough so she can get out of town.  Now when this new prosecutor comes in he will be working with what she basically left in the files for him (which is nothing).  How will he know if there is evidence missing when he wasn't on the case from the beginning.  He will try and prosecute and he will come to court with a big blank.



San,
This has been in the back of my mind since we figured out that this is nothing but a cover up.  What if the only reason for going to court is to exonerate Joran.  I mean stage kangaroo court so that the Sloots can then say he was found INNOCENT in a court of law the way they say now that he is innocent because no one collected any evidence??

That to me would be worse than having him walk the earth under a cloud of suspicion the rest of his life.  But to go to court and be found as they will say, Innocent in stead of just not guilty would be hard to take!!


(http://i15.photobucket.com/albums/a360/AnnaBlueSkies/Greetings/Holidays%20and%20BD/ththmiscellaneous11135250347.gif)


Title: Lively Case Discussion #553 12/3 - 12/4/2006
Post by: klaasend on December 03, 2006, 03:34:50 PM
OK - back to the case.

We need to find out how RUTH DIJKHOFF died and if it's the same Ruth Dijkhoff that Paulus spoke with at the bank.


http://www.mementomori.net/05148.html


Title: Lively Case Discussion #553 12/3 - 12/4/2006
Post by: Kat_Gram on December 03, 2006, 03:45:56 PM
Based on the little we saw of KJ I am going to guess 45 or a little more.
It is hard for me to figure out how old some women are. Depends on how much care has been taking place over the years.. diet exercise, that kind of thing.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #553 12/3 - 12/4/2006
Post by: Anna on December 03, 2006, 03:46:21 PM
Quote from: "Kat_Gram"
If Jossy has this tape with Dompig why didn't he share it with deVries ?
I haven't read the whole transcript as it isn't availbale, but doesn't that change some assumptions that were made in the program ?



Yeah!  We heard DeVries was in the newspaper offices so much some thought that was going to be his only source.  Maybe Jossy was out of town all that time?

But still, I wish he had shared.  Maybe he wants to scoop for himself being a journalist and owner of a paper himself??


(http://i15.photobucket.com/albums/a360/AnnaBlueSkies/Greetings/Holidays%20and%20BD/thholiday_events_71.gif)


Title: Lively Case Discussion #553 12/3 - 12/4/2006
Post by: Kat_Gram on December 03, 2006, 03:49:54 PM
Where are the written obits in Aruba ? This woman passed in June 18, 2005.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #553 12/3 - 12/4/2006
Post by: klaasend on December 03, 2006, 03:50:46 PM
De Vries has shows coming up every Sunday.  His show tonight doesn't look like it has anything to do with the NH case.  Maybe his shows on 12/10 or 12/17 will though?


Title: Lively Case Discussion #553 12/3 - 12/4/2006
Post by: klaasend on December 03, 2006, 03:51:57 PM
Quote from: "Kat_Gram"
Where are the written obits in Aruba ? This woman passed in June 18, 2005.

Written obits are in the various newspapers but I've been searching and haven't been able to pull up any of the obit archives for June 2005.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #553 12/3 - 12/4/2006
Post by: cubbeegirl on December 03, 2006, 03:53:58 PM
Quote from: "klaasend"
Quote from: "Kat_Gram"
Where are the written obits in Aruba ? This woman passed in June 18, 2005.

Written obits are in the various newspapers but I've been searching and haven't been able to pull up any of the obit archives for June 2005.



Maybe they disapppeared as so many things seem to do in this case... :roll:
Klaas, this womans untimely death is really disturbing to say the least...


Title: Lively Case Discussion #553 12/3 - 12/4/2006
Post by: Anna on December 03, 2006, 03:54:38 PM
Quote from: "klaasend"
OK - back to the case.

We need to find out how RUTH DIJKHOFF died and if it's the same Ruth Dijkhoff that Paulus spoke with at the bank.


http://www.mementomori.net/05148.html



No one would be callous enough to use a person for an alibi just because they died, would they?  Or to enhance their reputation for playing cards as Joran did exploiting the fact he knew Natalee would not be back to contradict him.

Paulus prolly read the obits daily to see who he could work into his storyline.  Sorry, I know pure speculation but I can believe he would think this way based on his and Joran's actions with regard to those who cannot tell their side of things.


(http://i15.photobucket.com/albums/a360/AnnaBlueSkies/Greetings/Holidays%20and%20BD/thA_lightstring_20023.gif)(http://i15.photobucket.com/albums/a360/AnnaBlueSkies/Greetings/Holidays%20and%20BD/thA_lightstring_20023.gif)(http://i15.photobucket.com/albums/a360/AnnaBlueSkies/Greetings/Holidays%20and%20BD/thA_lightstring_20023.gif)


Title: Lively Case Discussion #553 12/3 - 12/4/2006
Post by: Lala'sMom on December 03, 2006, 03:55:12 PM
Quote from: "Sue"
test



I am so very jealous!!  You get to ride with Santa.  I just get to make the list. :roll:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #553 12/3 - 12/4/2006
Post by: Anna on December 03, 2006, 04:00:21 PM
But the woman died BEFORE Paulus said he talked to her, right?  No mention of even going to the bank in first statement then in the later one he not only went once but twice?

I can't think of much of any reason he is involving her other than she is dead and cannot contradict the fact he wasn't even there.

OTOH, it would take on a far more sinister meaning if he deposited say exactly $50 US, wouldn't it?

 :roll:

But I think this is just Paulus being opportunistic and using her because he read her obit and knows she works at the bank.  Would be joke on him if she was ill and not working there that day, too.

(http://i15.photobucket.com/albums/a360/AnnaBlueSkies/Greetings/Holidays%20and%20BD/th3ianm__0223435533331616161718171.gif)


Title: Lively Case Discussion #553 12/3 - 12/4/2006
Post by: cubbeegirl on December 03, 2006, 04:07:02 PM
Quote from: "Anna"
But the woman died BEFORE Paulus said he talked to her, right?  No mention of even going to the bank in first statement then in the later one he not only went once but twice?

I can't think of much of any reason he is involving her other than she is dead and cannot contradict the fact he wasn't even there.

OTOH, it would take on a far more sinister meaning if he deposited say exactly $50 US, wouldn't it?

 :roll:

But I think this is just Paulus being opportunistic and using her because he read her obit and knows she works at the bank.  Would be joke on him if she was ill and not working there that day, too.

(http://i15.photobucket.com/albums/a360/AnnaBlueSkies/Greetings/Holidays%20and%20BD/th3ianm__0223435533331616161718171.gif)


It still disturbs me Anna....its creepy...


Title: Lively Case Discussion #553 12/3 - 12/4/2006
Post by: Anna on December 03, 2006, 04:09:45 PM
Have to go take care of things but will be back tonight.  If there is any coverage of these latest developments, please post.  I wonder if Nancy Grace and the rest were sent copies of the photoshopped pictures of Joran and Natalee.  They would still have to have permission to use them I suppose?

The cage is just beautiful and so festive!!  Klaas, CBB and all look stunning!

Be back tonight. . . . . . .

(http://i15.photobucket.com/albums/a360/AnnaBlueSkies/Greetings/Holidays%20and%20BD/thdivers6.gif)(http://i15.photobucket.com/albums/a360/AnnaBlueSkies/Greetings/Holidays%20and%20BD/thdivers6.gif)(http://i15.photobucket.com/albums/a360/AnnaBlueSkies/Greetings/Holidays%20and%20BD/thdivers6.gif)(http://i15.photobucket.com/albums/a360/AnnaBlueSkies/Greetings/Holidays%20and%20BD/thdivers6.gif)


Title: Lively Case Discussion #553 12/3 - 12/4/2006
Post by: snoopy on December 03, 2006, 04:16:55 PM
Quote from: "Lala'sMom"
Since I seem to be talking to myself...just want all our monkeys that could be affected by the weather in the Midwest and other places to know we are thinking about them...I was wondering about our Snoop Dog and the others that live in those states affected.  Anyone know?  Help me out here, if I have numbers for any of them I will call and check on them.  What about Misgivings?  Would she be affected?


Hi everybody!!   :D  :D

I'm fine.  Thanks for asking.  Had about 3 inches of ice.  We never lost our electricity, but many of my family members did.  All are doing fine.

My hubby was stranded at Lake of the Ozarks with my nephews.  Got 3 inches of ice then 12-15 inches of snow.  Ya'll these are Florida boys.  They were freakin out!!  :lol:  :lol:   Hubby made it home last night about 8pm, and the boys made it to St. Louis near Lambert airport around the same time.  Boys are headed back to Florida right now.  They had just bought a house at the lake.  This was their first trip to their "new" house.  They had to steal wood from the neighbors house.  Geez I hope they left a note.

Um.........they said they will be back in the spring, and will never listen to my weather report again!!   :lol:  :lol:  :lol:   I will never live this down.

Rock On!!

 8)


Title: Lively Case Discussion #553 12/3 - 12/4/2006
Post by: Anna on December 03, 2006, 04:17:09 PM
Quote from: "cubbeegirl"
[It still disturbs me Anna....its creepy...



It is.  And like the death of some of the others, Pitbull, Renee the refinery worker, etc. all seem sort of clustered around Natalee's disappearance.

And all those young people dying.  I suspect HIV/AIDS is a factor in some of those but still, the death/suicide rate must be very high.

Off to chores and some outside where it is freezing cold. . . brrr!!  I keep stalling but its not going to get any warmer today.  Shock going from mid 70's to 20 degrees tonight in 2 or 3 days.  Remember to leave water dripping those in the frozen tundra of the South!  Some of our water pipes are very shallow under the soil here.   :roll:


(http://i15.photobucket.com/albums/a360/AnnaBlueSkies/Greetings/Holidays%20and%20BD/thgift08.gif)


Title: Lively Case Discussion #553 12/3 - 12/4/2006
Post by: Mere on December 03, 2006, 04:19:05 PM
Quote from: "klaasend"
OK - back to the case.

We need to find out how RUTH DIJKHOFF died and if it's the same Ruth Dijkhoff that Paulus spoke with at the bank.


http://www.mementomori.net/05148.html


I swear I can find out about the sugar content of dog food....but I cannot find a thing about Ruth Dijkhoff....only the obit.....anyone else...?


Title: Lively Case Discussion #553 12/3 - 12/4/2006
Post by: Anna on December 03, 2006, 04:19:44 PM
Hey, Snoopy!!

(http://i15.photobucket.com/albums/a360/AnnaBlueSkies/Greetings/Holidays%20and%20BD/th11.gif)


 :D  :D  :D


Title: Lively Case Discussion #553 12/3 - 12/4/2006
Post by: San on December 03, 2006, 04:26:19 PM
Quote from: "Anna"
Quote from: "klaasend"
OK - back to the case.

We need to find out how RUTH DIJKHOFF died and if it's the same Ruth Dijkhoff that Paulus spoke with at the bank.


http://www.mementomori.net/05148.html



No one would be callous enough to use a person for an alibi just because they died, would they?  Or to enhance their reputation for playing cards as Joran did exploiting the fact he knew Natalee would not be back to contradict him.

Paulus prolly read the obits daily to see who he could work into his storyline.  Sorry, I know pure speculation but I can believe he would think this way based on his and Joran's actions with regard to those who cannot tell their side of things.


(http://i15.photobucket.com/albums/a360/AnnaBlueSkies/Greetings/Holidays%20and%20BD/thA_lightstring_20023.gif)(http://i15.photobucket.com/albums/a360/AnnaBlueSkies/Greetings/Holidays%20and%20BD/thA_lightstring_20023.gif)(http://i15.photobucket.com/albums/a360/AnnaBlueSkies/Greetings/Holidays%20and%20BD/thA_lightstring_20023.gif)

I thought of this also.  Why the need for Paulus to mention who he visited in the bank.  For a man that doesn't have a good memory he sure did remember her name.

Imagine if she wasn't even at work that day :shock:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #553 12/3 - 12/4/2006
Post by: klaasend on December 03, 2006, 04:26:44 PM
QUESTION:  If you saw this girl in Aruba, might you confuse her with Natalee?  This girl has several of the same/usual friends....Renzo, Aline, Alexx, Maikel, Quincy, Gabe Leo.

To me she looks at first glance somewhat like Natalee:


http://connect.tickle.com/profile/index.html?id=l8hCdDvPLjpvcYs4

(http://i37.photobucket.com/albums/e82/klaasend2/Marabel.jpg)


Title: Lively Case Discussion #553 12/3 - 12/4/2006
Post by: cubbeegirl on December 03, 2006, 04:29:22 PM
Quote from: "klaasend"
QUESTION:  If you saw this girl in Aruba, might you confuse her with Natalee?  This girl has several of the same/usual friends....Renzo, Aline, Alexx, Maikel, Quincy, Gabe Leo.

To me she looks at first glance somewhat like Natalee:


http://connect.tickle.com/profile/index.html?id=l8hCdDvPLjpvcYs4

(http://i37.photobucket.com/albums/e82/klaasend2/Marabel.jpg)



She does to me too klaas ....AND you know as well as I do that she could look either more so or less so in person...


Title: Lively Case Discussion #553 12/3 - 12/4/2006
Post by: San on December 03, 2006, 04:29:28 PM
Quote from: "klaasend"
QUESTION:  If you saw this girl in Aruba, might you confuse her with Natalee?  This girl has several of the same/usual friends....Renzo, Aline, Alexx, Maikel, Quincy, Gabe Leo.

To me she looks at first glance somewhat like Natalee:


http://connect.tickle.com/profile/index.html?id=l8hCdDvPLjpvcYs4

(http://i37.photobucket.com/albums/e82/klaasend2/Marabel.jpg)

I agree Klaas she does look like her at first glance.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #553 12/3 - 12/4/2006
Post by: klaasend on December 03, 2006, 04:33:39 PM
My point of posting that photo is, we don't know who claims to have seen Natalee doing coke.  We don't know if it's a bogus witness or someone who really thinks they saw Natalee.  The thing is, this girl could be mistaken for Natalee, IMO.  Not saying this girl would do drugs, just trying to make a point.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #553 12/3 - 12/4/2006
Post by: klaasend on December 03, 2006, 04:36:34 PM
(http://static.flickr.com/26/41543108_572e933c60.jpg)


Title: Lively Case Discussion #553 12/3 - 12/4/2006
Post by: cubbeegirl on December 03, 2006, 04:42:53 PM
Quote from: "klaasend"
My point of posting that photo is, we don't know who claims to have seen Natalee doing coke.  We don't know if it's a bogus witness or someone who really thinks they saw Natalee.  The thing is, this girl could be mistaken for Natalee, IMO.  Not saying this girl would do drugs, just trying to make a point.



I totally agree...


Title: Lively Case Discussion #553 12/3 - 12/4/2006
Post by: Kat_Gram on December 03, 2006, 04:43:00 PM
I think that there were several NOT Natalees spotted.
Would want to see the entire PV as to where, when and who this girl in the PV was with.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #553 12/3 - 12/4/2006
Post by: Leslie on December 03, 2006, 04:52:38 PM
The same day Ruth Dijkhoff died..."June 18 (2005)– Rene Van Heyningen found partially beheaded in a cemetery"


Title: Lively Case Discussion #553 12/3 - 12/4/2006
Post by: klaasend on December 03, 2006, 04:55:47 PM
Quote from: "Leslie"
The same day Ruth Dijkhoff died..."June 18 (2005)– Rene Van Heyningen found partially beheaded in a cemetery"


Busy day in Aruba huh?


Title: Lively Case Discussion #553 12/3 - 12/4/2006
Post by: Sue on December 03, 2006, 05:04:54 PM
Quote from: "klaasend"
QUESTION:  If you saw this girl in Aruba, might you confuse her with Natalee?  This girl has several of the same/usual friends....Renzo, Aline, Alexx, Maikel, Quincy, Gabe Leo.

To me she looks at first glance somewhat like Natalee:


http://connect.tickle.com/profile/index.html?id=l8hCdDvPLjpvcYs4

(http://i37.photobucket.com/albums/e82/klaasend2/Marabel.jpg)



Stange thing about this is you keep clicking on her pictures and her friends list changes .. She has Natalee's Site on her friends list Just found it


Title: Lively Case Discussion #553 12/3 - 12/4/2006
Post by: robots on December 03, 2006, 05:07:57 PM
bigger in the chest area


Title: Lively Case Discussion #553 12/3 - 12/4/2006
Post by: BTgirl on December 03, 2006, 05:12:56 PM
Quote from: "robots"
bigger in the chest area


Robots is definitely a guy.  :lol:  :P


Title: Lively Case Discussion #553 12/3 - 12/4/2006
Post by: 2NJSons_Mom on December 03, 2006, 05:13:48 PM
Sleezeball Marten also shows up with a story about her, referencing others.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #553 12/3 - 12/4/2006
Post by: robots on December 03, 2006, 05:15:17 PM
Quote from: "BTgirl"
Quote from: "robots"
bigger in the chest area


Robots is definitely a guy.  :lol:  :P


LOL  :oops:  :oops:  :oops:  :oops:

well, i tried to say it in a nice way and yet i can see the similarities
but there is difference and im not saying another word about it
so i will be safe......i hope  :D


Title: Lively Case Discussion #553 12/3 - 12/4/2006
Post by: BTgirl on December 03, 2006, 05:21:06 PM
Quote from: "robots"
Quote from: "BTgirl"
Quote from: "robots"
bigger in the chest area


Robots is definitely a guy.  :lol:  :P


LOL  :oops:  :oops:  :oops:  :oops:

well, i tried to say it in a nice way and yet i can see the similarities
but there is difference and im not saying another word about it
so i will be safe......i hope  :D


You said it in a nice way.  :wink:
It's just that I was noticing shade of hair, shape of eyes, etc., and hadn't even looked at the chest area.  :lol:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #553 12/3 - 12/4/2006
Post by: Lala'sMom on December 03, 2006, 05:26:34 PM
Quote from: "Leslie"
The same day Ruth Dijkhoff died..."June 18 (2005)– Rene Van Heyningen found partially beheaded in a cemetery"


 :shock:  :shock: Can you say twilight zone?  I hear the music in the background. :shock:  :shock:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #553 12/3 - 12/4/2006
Post by: Mere on December 03, 2006, 05:27:00 PM
Leslie....if you are there....can we look at what happened around the 18th of June...in one of your morning papers....which might tell us something about Ruth Dijkhoff and her death...perhaps it was an accident....?
Still a good choice for Paul to use on his trip to bank....


Title: Lively Case Discussion #553 12/3 - 12/4/2006
Post by: Lala'sMom on December 03, 2006, 05:27:40 PM
Quote from: "robots"
bigger in the chest area



Robots!  :wink:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #553 12/3 - 12/4/2006
Post by: robots on December 03, 2006, 05:28:44 PM
Quote from: "BTgirl"
Quote from: "robots"
Quote from: "BTgirl"
Quote from: "robots"
bigger in the chest area


Robots is definitely a guy.  :lol:  :P


LOL  :oops:  :oops:  :oops:  :oops:

well, i tried to say it in a nice way and yet i can see the similarities
but there is difference and im not saying another word about it
so i will be safe......i hope  :D


You said it in a nice way.  :wink:
It's just that I was noticing shade of hair, shape of eyes, etc., and hadn't even looked at the chest area.  :lol:



 :wink:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #553 12/3 - 12/4/2006
Post by: Lala'sMom on December 03, 2006, 05:29:34 PM
Hey Snoopster! Glad you are okay...been thinking about you.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #553 12/3 - 12/4/2006
Post by: Lala'sMom on December 03, 2006, 05:32:50 PM
I have a question...don't I always?  

Is Jossy in Aruba or in Florida?  Do we know?  I can't get Dana's show to play for me, please if someone would just give me a short synopsis of what Jossy said I would really appreciate it. TIA


Title: Lively Case Discussion #553 12/3 - 12/4/2006
Post by: Leslie on December 03, 2006, 05:32:54 PM
Quote from: "MeMere"
Leslie....if you are there....can we look at what happened around the 18th of June...in one of your morning papers....which might tell us something about Ruth Dijkhoff and her death...perhaps it was an accident....?
Still a good choice for Paul to use on his trip to bank....

I have tried accessing the archives of all the Aruban newspapers and ... no luck.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #553 12/3 - 12/4/2006
Post by: Mere on December 03, 2006, 05:36:58 PM
Quote from: "Leslie"
Quote from: "MeMere"
Leslie....if you are there....can we look at what happened around the 18th of June...in one of your morning papers....which might tell us something about Ruth Dijkhoff and her death...perhaps it was an accident....?
Still a good choice for Paul to use on his trip to bank....

I have tried accessing the archives of all the Aruban newspapers and ... no luck.


Thanks Leslie.....same here....thought you might know something about those archives..... :?


Title: Lively Case Discussion #553 12/3 - 12/4/2006
Post by: robots on December 03, 2006, 05:39:05 PM
Quote from: "Lala'sMom"
Quote from: "robots"
bigger in the chest area



Robots!  :wink:




 :oops:  :oops:  :oops:  :oops:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #553 12/3 - 12/4/2006
Post by: klaasend on December 03, 2006, 05:39:12 PM
Kat_Gram -  :lol:

(http://i37.photobucket.com/albums/e82/klaasend2/Kat_Gram_Xmas2.gif)

http://i37.photobucket.com/albums/e82/klaasend2/Kat_Gram_Xmas2.gif


Title: Lively Case Discussion #553 12/3 - 12/4/2006
Post by: klaasend on December 03, 2006, 05:51:28 PM
Robots  :lol:  :lol:  :lol:

(http://i37.photobucket.com/albums/e82/klaasend2/robotsxmas.gif)

http://i37.photobucket.com/albums/e82/klaasend2/robotsxmas.gif


Title: Lively Case Discussion #553 12/3 - 12/4/2006
Post by: Shell on December 03, 2006, 05:54:30 PM
Quote from: "robots"
Quote from: "Lala'sMom"
Quote from: "robots"
bigger in the chest area



Robots!  :wink:




 :oops:  :oops:  :oops:  :oops:


hehe, hey you all. I have been lurking, popping in to say hello.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #553 12/3 - 12/4/2006
Post by: BTgirl on December 03, 2006, 05:58:30 PM
Quote from: "Shell"
Quote from: "robots"
Quote from: "Lala'sMom"
Quote from: "robots"
bigger in the chest area



Robots!  :wink:




 :oops:  :oops:  :oops:  :oops:


hehe, hey you all. I have been lurking, popping in to say hello.


Hi Shell. Good to see you.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #553 12/3 - 12/4/2006
Post by: BTgirl on December 03, 2006, 05:59:34 PM
Quote from: "Lala'sMom"
I have a question...don't I always?  

Is Jossy in Aruba or in Florida?  Do we know?  I can't get Dana's show to play for me, please if someone would just give me a short synopsis of what Jossy said I would really appreciate it. TIA


Lala's

I can't give you a synopsis oof the show, but the last I heard Jossy was in Aruba.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #553 12/3 - 12/4/2006
Post by: klaasend on December 03, 2006, 06:03:52 PM
Hi Shell!  Great to see you!


Title: Lively Case Discussion #553 12/3 - 12/4/2006
Post by: Lala'sMom on December 03, 2006, 06:04:19 PM
Thanks BT.  I see you are in your holiday finest.  When did Jossy return from Florida?  I miss everything. Does he have family in Florida?


Title: Lively Case Discussion #553 12/3 - 12/4/2006
Post by: BTgirl on December 03, 2006, 06:07:41 PM
Quote from: "Lala'sMom"
Thanks BT.  I see you are in your holiday finest.  When did Jossy return from Florida?  I miss everything. Does he have family in Florida?


Well, Lala's, you know I'm old and forgetful. I'll try to remember what I was told, but someone else here may have more accurate knowledge. The best I can remember, he does have family in Florida, but can only stay there for a certain length of time each year due to visa requirements. I'm thinking he has been back in Aruba for the last month or two.

If anyone knows this is wrong, please feel free to give Lala's the right information.  :D


Title: Lively Case Discussion #553 12/3 - 12/4/2006
Post by: Lala'sMom on December 03, 2006, 06:08:05 PM
Hello Shell, so good to see you.  We have missed you.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #553 12/3 - 12/4/2006
Post by: Katysmom on December 03, 2006, 06:08:18 PM
Quote from: "2NJSons_Mom"
Sleezeball Marten also shows up with a story about her, referencing others.


That man is one sick puppy


Title: Lively Case Discussion #553 12/3 - 12/4/2006
Post by: Tylergal on December 03, 2006, 06:13:10 PM
Quote from: "Anna"
Quote from: "klaasend"
OK - back to the case.

We need to find out how RUTH DIJKHOFF died and if it's the same Ruth Dijkhoff that Paulus spoke with at the bank.


http://www.mementomori.net/05148.html



No one would be callous enough to use a person for an alibi just because they died, would they?  Or to enhance their reputation for playing cards as Joran did exploiting the fact he knew Natalee would not be back to contradict him.

Paulus prolly read the obits daily to see who he could work into his storyline.  Sorry, I know pure speculation but I can believe he would think this way based on his and Joran's actions with regard to those who cannot tell their side of things.


(http://i15.photobucket.com/albums/a360/AnnaBlueSkies/Greetings/Holidays%20and%20BD/thA_lightstring_20023.gif)(http://i15.photobucket.com/albums/a360/AnnaBlueSkies/Greetings/Holidays%20and%20BD/thA_lightstring_20023.gif)(http://i15.photobucket.com/albums/a360/AnnaBlueSkies/Greetings/Holidays%20and%20BD/thA_lightstring_20023.gif)


do you think she committed suicide? :shock:  :shock:  :shock:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #553 12/3 - 12/4/2006
Post by: Tylergal on December 03, 2006, 06:17:23 PM
Quote from: "klaasend"
My point of posting that photo is, we don't know who claims to have seen Natalee doing coke.  We don't know if it's a bogus witness or someone who really thinks they saw Natalee.  The thing is, this girl could be mistaken for Natalee, IMO.  Not saying this girl would do drugs, just trying to make a point.


She could be make to look like she was Natalee shopping in a jeweler or using her ATM or offering someone coke, especially if a key reporter who is good with photography, and knows how to photoshop a little and lie a lot had anything to do with it.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #553 12/3 - 12/4/2006
Post by: Tylergal on December 03, 2006, 06:18:33 PM
Quote from: "Leslie"
The same day Ruth Dijkhoff died..."June 18 (2005)– Rene Van Heyningen found partially beheaded in a cemetery"


That was exactly what I thought.  Anyone here read Beach House?  The murder is committed somewhere between 5/29 and 5/30 by the fixer who takes care of anyone who is "against" the powers that be.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #553 12/3 - 12/4/2006
Post by: mishy on December 03, 2006, 06:22:18 PM
Monkeys, let me say that everyone looks so nice in their Christmas attire!! It's so festive in the cage...it's really helping me get in the spirit.

CBB, you're doing a great job with the Photoshop work...and so is Klaas, as usual. She did wonders for my look  :lol:

Hey Snoopy! Glad you are OK~~


Title: Lively Case Discussion #553 12/3 - 12/4/2006
Post by: klaasend on December 03, 2006, 06:25:48 PM
Quote from: "Tylergal"
Quote from: "klaasend"
My point of posting that photo is, we don't know who claims to have seen Natalee doing coke.  We don't know if it's a bogus witness or someone who really thinks they saw Natalee.  The thing is, this girl could be mistaken for Natalee, IMO.  Not saying this girl would do drugs, just trying to make a point.


She could be make to look like she was Natalee shopping in a jeweler or using her ATM or offering someone coke, especially if a key reporter who is good with photography, and knows how to photoshop a little and lie a lot had anything to do with it.

Exactly  :wink:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #553 12/3 - 12/4/2006
Post by: memphis on December 03, 2006, 06:29:01 PM
Forgive me for being a little off the current topic....just working on a theory....

I believe I saw Florida post modeling pictures of Guido (which I had seen) and GVC. Is it common knowledge amongst monkeys that GVC modeled also? Does anyone know if it was the same agency?

Tell me if this has already been beat to death and i will shut up.  :)


Title: Lively Case Discussion #553 12/3 - 12/4/2006
Post by: Dana on December 03, 2006, 06:30:42 PM
Quote from: "Lala'sMom"
Hello Shell, so good to see you.  We have missed you.


Is it just the replay you have trouble with, or cant you listen live either ?
What player are you using.
Tom has it set up now so you can just play the file right from the web page as an option, or just download it.
For those that missed the show I will re air it tonight at 9pm et on
www.scaredmonkeys.com/radio


Title: Lively Case Discussion #553 12/3 - 12/4/2006
Post by: Lala'sMom on December 03, 2006, 06:31:02 PM
Quote from: "memphis"
Forgive me for being a little off the current topic....just working on a theory....

I believe I saw Florida post modeling pictures of Guido (which I had seen) and GVC. Is it common knowledge amongst monkeys that GVC modeled also? Does anyone know if it was the same agency?

Tell me if this has already been beat to death and i will shut up.  :)



 Good question...I don't know the answer though.  Bet Klaas does. :wink:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #553 12/3 - 12/4/2006
Post by: klaasend on December 03, 2006, 06:31:20 PM
Quote from: "memphis"
Forgive me for being a little off the current topic....just working on a theory....

I believe I saw Florida post modeling pictures of Guido (which I had seen) and GVC. Is it common knowledge amongst monkeys that GVC modeled also? Does anyone know if it was the same agency?

Tell me if this has already been beat to death and i will shut up.  :)

Those weren't modeling photos of GVC, but photos he posted at his Hi5 site.  That's not to say that he hasn't modeled, I just don't believe that's where those photos came from.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #553 12/3 - 12/4/2006
Post by: Lala'sMom on December 03, 2006, 06:33:54 PM
Quote from: "Dana"
Quote from: "Lala'sMom"
Hello Shell, so good to see you.  We have missed you.


Is it just the replay you have trouble with, or cant you listen live either ?
What player are you using.
Tom has it set up now so you can just play the file right from the web page as an option, or just download it.
For those that missed the show I will re air it tonight at 9pm et on
www.scaredmonkeys.com/radio


I can usually listen live, but I was gone last night so I tried the replay without success.  Thanks for the info.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #553 12/3 - 12/4/2006
Post by: memphis on December 03, 2006, 06:36:29 PM
Quote from: "klaasend"
Quote from: "memphis"
Forgive me for being a little off the current topic....just working on a theory....

I believe I saw Florida post modeling pictures of Guido (which I had seen) and GVC. Is it common knowledge amongst monkeys that GVC modeled also? Does anyone know if it was the same agency?

Tell me if this has already been beat to death and i will shut up.  :)

Those weren't modeling photos of GVC, but photos he posted at his Hi5 site.  That's not to say that he hasn't modeled, I just don't believe that's where those photos came from.


This was just one very small picture and it didn't look like the others I've seen with the tourist girs, etc. I got the impression it was an official modeling picture. I will try and find it or ask Florida.

Thanks Klaas!


Title: Lively Case Discussion #553 12/3 - 12/4/2006
Post by: memphis on December 03, 2006, 06:37:58 PM
Quote from: "Dana"
Quote from: "Lala'sMom"
Hello Shell, so good to see you.  We have missed you.


Is it just the replay you have trouble with, or cant you listen live either ?
What player are you using.
Tom has it set up now so you can just play the file right from the web page as an option, or just download it.
For those that missed the show I will re air it tonight at 9pm et on
www.scaredmonkeys.com/radio


Dana, I can listen to the archives, but have lots of troublel listening live. The player that comes up is Itunes.  :?  I don't know how to change it and use another player.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #553 12/3 - 12/4/2006
Post by: Dana on December 03, 2006, 06:40:35 PM
Quote from: "memphis"
Quote from: "Dana"
Quote from: "Lala'sMom"
Hello Shell, so good to see you.  We have missed you.


Is it just the replay you have trouble with, or cant you listen live either ?
What player are you using.
Tom has it set up now so you can just play the file right from the web page as an option, or just download it.
For those that missed the show I will re air it tonight at 9pm et on
www.scaredmonkeys.com/radio


Dana, I can listen to the archives, but have lots of troublel listening live. The player that comes up is Itunes.  :?  I don't know how to change it and use another player.


The best player for live is winamp.
A free player can be downloaded at www.winamp.com
You must a setting in your i tunes that makes it the default player.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #553 12/3 - 12/4/2006
Post by: memphis on December 03, 2006, 06:42:08 PM
Yes, but I have looked everywhere for that little button. I think that Itunes planned it that way.  :wink:

I'll download WinAmp and mark it as the default player.

Thanks so much!  :lol:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #553 12/3 - 12/4/2006
Post by: klaasend on December 03, 2006, 06:42:38 PM
Quote from: "memphis"
Quote from: "klaasend"
Quote from: "memphis"
Forgive me for being a little off the current topic....just working on a theory....

I believe I saw Florida post modeling pictures of Guido (which I had seen) and GVC. Is it common knowledge amongst monkeys that GVC modeled also? Does anyone know if it was the same agency?

Tell me if this has already been beat to death and i will shut up.  :)

Those weren't modeling photos of GVC, but photos he posted at his Hi5 site.  That's not to say that he hasn't modeled, I just don't believe that's where those photos came from.


This was just one very small picture and it didn't look like the others I've seen with the tourist girs, etc. I got the impression it was an official modeling picture. I will try and find it or ask Florida.

Thanks Klaas!


I think this is the one you are referring to and Florida did call it GVC modeling, but I don't think it really is.  We know Guido was a model and had his photo at a modeling site, as far as I know this photo of GVC came off of his tickle or Hi5 site.

(http://i20.photobucket.com/albums/b223/NYSusan/gvcmodel.jpg)


Title: Lively Case Discussion #553 12/3 - 12/4/2006
Post by: memphis on December 03, 2006, 06:44:55 PM
Klaas, That's it! Thank you!

I feel better. It looks like a modeling pic and I was thinking the two may know each other.  :wink:


Thanks again!


Title: Lively Case Discussion #553 12/3 - 12/4/2006
Post by: 2NJSons_Mom on December 03, 2006, 06:55:42 PM
Quote from: "Tylergal"
Quote from: "Leslie"
The same day Ruth Dijkhoff died..."June 18 (2005)– Rene Van Heyningen found partially beheaded in a cemetery"


That was exactly what I thought.  Anyone here read Beach House?  The murder is committed somewhere between 5/29 and 5/30 by the fixer who takes care of anyone who is "against" the powers that be.


I've been looking around on this.  

6/18/05 was a Saturday, and also the day following Steve Croes arrest.  

6/23/05 (Thursday) was the date PVDS was arrested & said he talked to Ruth Dijkhoff at the bank...it doesn't say, however, that she, in fact, worked there, but I did find something inconclusive that could mean she had been a bank employee at another bank, prior.  R. Dijkhoff is a contact listed on a 2001 Registration form on this site:

http://www.visitaruba.com/facts/general/musea/iaca/registration.html

If the deceased Ruth Dijkhoff-Holtmann is the same person he reference, I, too, am coming up with nothing more.  If she is the same person, it's eery, like many other things, that she'd was dead 3 weeks later.  

As Anna and others said, if she'd been an employee at CMB, and was not in on that date, that would be something.  If she was just another customer, it wouldn't mean much, at all, especially now.  Just my thoughts at the moment.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #553 12/3 - 12/4/2006
Post by: klaasend on December 03, 2006, 06:56:51 PM
THE LINEUP - Fox News - 10pm Eastern

12/3/2006

Did a lawyer for one of the suspects in the Natalee Holloway case pay a visit to the lead prosecutor to "clear his conscience"?  We have the scoop.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #553 12/3 - 12/4/2006
Post by: Shell on December 03, 2006, 06:58:55 PM
I sure wish my memory was better on this, or that I had saved the link..sigh...but I was reading the other day about a modeling agency that was really a front for porn. Unsuspecting young ladies (girls actually), asked to pose in provacative poses. The method sounded a lot like a Freddy setup. Did anyone else see this story, I think it was on msn news? Or did I dream it...lol


Title: Lively Case Discussion #553 12/3 - 12/4/2006
Post by: Dana on December 03, 2006, 06:59:38 PM
Quote from: "klaasend"
THE LINEUP - Fox News - 10pm Eastern

12/3/2006

Did a lawyer for one of the suspects in the Natalee Holloway case pay a visit to the lead prosecutor to "clear his conscience"?  We have the scoop.


scoop or poop :-)

cant help but ask with some of these shows . :-)


Title: Lively Case Discussion #553 12/3 - 12/4/2006
Post by: klaasend on December 03, 2006, 07:00:59 PM
Quote from: "2NJSons_Mom"
Quote from: "Tylergal"
Quote from: "Leslie"
The same day Ruth Dijkhoff died..."June 18 (2005)– Rene Van Heyningen found partially beheaded in a cemetery"


That was exactly what I thought.  Anyone here read Beach House?  The murder is committed somewhere between 5/29 and 5/30 by the fixer who takes care of anyone who is "against" the powers that be.


I've been looking around on this.  

6/18/05 was a Saturday, and also the day following Steve Croes arrest.  

6/23/05 (Thursday) was the date PVDS was arrested & said he talked to Ruth Dijkhoff at the bank...it doesn't say, however, that she, in fact, worked there, but I did find something inconclusive that could mean she had been a bank employee at another bank, prior.  R. Dijkhoff is a contact listed on a 2001 Registration form on this site:

http://www.visitaruba.com/facts/general/musea/iaca/registration.html

If the deceased Ruth Dijkhoff-Holtmann is the same person he reference, I, too, am coming up with nothing more.  If she is the same person, it's eery, like many other things, that she'd was dead 3 weeks later.  

As Anna and others said, if she'd been an employee at CMB, and was not in on that date, that would be something.  If she was just another customer, it wouldn't mean much, at all, especially now.  Just my thoughts at the moment.


That's this guy which could have been her husband...don't know:

(http://www.cmbnv.com/pics/CMB_DIJKHOFF.jpg)
R.M. Dijkhoff
Assistant Managing Director


http://www.cmbnv.com/management.php


Title: Lively Case Discussion #553 12/3 - 12/4/2006
Post by: San on December 03, 2006, 07:04:11 PM
Quote from: "2NJSons_Mom"
Quote from: "Tylergal"
Quote from: "Leslie"
The same day Ruth Dijkhoff died..."June 18 (2005)– Rene Van Heyningen found partially beheaded in a cemetery"


That was exactly what I thought.  Anyone here read Beach House?  The murder is committed somewhere between 5/29 and 5/30 by the fixer who takes care of anyone who is "against" the powers that be.


I've been looking around on this.  

6/18/05 was a Saturday, and also the day following Steve Croes arrest.  

6/23/05 (Thursday) was the date PVDS was arrested & said he talked to Ruth Dijkhoff at the bank...it doesn't say, however, that she, in fact, worked there, but I did find something inconclusive that could mean she had been a bank employee at another bank, prior.  R. Dijkhoff is a contact listed on a 2001 Registration form on this site:

http://www.visitaruba.com/facts/general/musea/iaca/registration.html

If the deceased Ruth Dijkhoff-Holtmann is the same person he reference, I, too, am coming up with nothing more.  If she is the same person, it's eery, like many other things, that she'd was dead 3 weeks later.  

As Anna and others said, if she'd been an employee at CMB, and was not in on that date, that would be something.  If she was just another customer, it wouldn't mean much, at all, especially now.  Just my thoughts at the moment.

You might be right 2NJsons.  Paulus is using her as his alibi for seeing him at the bank.  He might in fact have a deposit slip that he deposited money that day but it doesn't mean he is the one who made the deposit.  Paulus makes it a point in saying he went to the bank twice that day and the first time the line was long so he went back later on.  That could be pure BS on his part because he was still at home cleaning the crime scene.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #553 12/3 - 12/4/2006
Post by: memphis on December 03, 2006, 07:10:45 PM
Quote from: "Shell"
I sure wish my memory was better on this, or that I had saved the link..sigh...but I was reading the other day about a modeling agency that was really a front for porn. Unsuspecting young ladies (girls actually), asked to pose in provacative poses. The method sounded a lot like a Freddy setup. Did anyone else see this story, I think it was on msn news? Or did I dream it...lol


In Aruba?

Glenda?

just kidding...


Title: Lively Case Discussion #553 12/3 - 12/4/2006
Post by: Kat_Gram on December 03, 2006, 07:12:02 PM
Quote from: "klaasend"
Kat_Gram -  :lol:

(http://i37.photobucket.com/albums/e82/klaasend2/Kat_Gram_Xmas2.gif)

http://i37.photobucket.com/albums/e82/klaasend2/Kat_Gram_Xmas2.gif

I wubs it .


Title: Lively Case Discussion #553 12/3 - 12/4/2006
Post by: 2NJSons_Mom on December 03, 2006, 07:12:46 PM
Yeah, San.  If you are going to pick a reliable witness, it helps if he/she passes on 6 days before you give your statement.   :wink:

Klaas, I hadn't looked at the CMB site in a while.  Figures there'd be a R. Dijkhoff there, too.    :lol:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #553 12/3 - 12/4/2006
Post by: klaasend on December 03, 2006, 07:13:13 PM
Kat_Gram - I may play around with yours some more  :wink:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #553 12/3 - 12/4/2006
Post by: Tylergal on December 03, 2006, 07:16:05 PM
Quote from: "2NJSons_Mom"
Quote from: "Tylergal"
Quote from: "Leslie"
The same day Ruth Dijkhoff died..."June 18 (2005)– Rene Van Heyningen found partially beheaded in a cemetery"


That was exactly what I thought.  Anyone here read Beach House?  The murder is committed somewhere between 5/29 and 5/30 by the fixer who takes care of anyone who is "against" the powers that be.


I've been looking around on this.  

6/18/05 was a Saturday, and also the day following Steve Croes arrest.  

6/23/05 (Thursday) was the date PVDS was arrested & said he talked to Ruth Dijkhoff at the bank...it doesn't say, however, that she, in fact, worked there, but I did find something inconclusive that could mean she had been a bank employee at another bank, prior.  R. Dijkhoff is a contact listed on a 2001 Registration form on this site:

http://www.visitaruba.com/facts/general/musea/iaca/registration.html

If the deceased Ruth Dijkhoff-Holtmann is the same person he reference, I, too, am coming up with nothing more.  If she is the same person, it's eery, like many other things, that she'd was dead 3 weeks later.  

As Anna and others said, if she'd been an employee at CMB, and was not in on that date, that would be something.  If she was just another customer, it wouldn't mean much, at all, especially now.  Just my thoughts at the moment.


I remember that Friday afternoon that we were all here and the initials for SGC and LVR came up as two suspects (but in retrospect I think it might have been guido van rijn).  The next day we heard about the man who was beheaded.  I believe it was Arubagirl who was telling us the names associated with the initials.  The ever-misleading Wonderwoman was giving out wrong information on that date. :roll:  SandraK was quick to proclaim Steve Croes as "my baby."


Title: Lively Case Discussion #553 12/3 - 12/4/2006
Post by: 2NJSons_Mom on December 03, 2006, 07:17:48 PM
Come to think of it, I couldn't tell you who I saw or talked to at the bank or grocery store two weeks ago, let alone remember how much I deposited, withdrew or bought.  If I needed to, I'd be in deep doodoo.  Nothing like pulling it out of your ear... :lol:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #553 12/3 - 12/4/2006
Post by: 2NJSons_Mom on December 03, 2006, 07:20:51 PM
Tyler, you probably have a better memory for dates, but I do remember the posts, as I was here, but lurking during that time.  IIRC, I held out registering until sometime mid-July '05.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #553 12/3 - 12/4/2006
Post by: Tylergal on December 03, 2006, 07:24:31 PM
the reason those dates stand out for me was because it was the friday following the infamous confession and we were getting ready to go to seaside.  I thought about Natalee all the way down there.  Several MBs own places at Seaside and I was thinking how sad, that Natalee must have been down there with her friends before and now she was dead in some faraway place, far from Seaside.  Just one of those significant times ---


Title: Lively Case Discussion #553 12/3 - 12/4/2006
Post by: cubbeegirl on December 03, 2006, 07:25:31 PM
Good evening monkeyfaces.... Just checking to make sure I am here...
My little thingy in my task bar says I have no connectivity... :roll:

Tyler I remember those posts as well...


Title: Lively Case Discussion #553 12/3 - 12/4/2006
Post by: cubbeegirl on December 03, 2006, 07:27:36 PM
Quote from: "Tylergal"
the reason those dates stand out for me was because it was the friday following the infamous confession and we were getting ready to go to seaside.  I thought about Natalee all the way down there.  Several MBs own places at Seaside and I was thinking how sad, that Natalee must have been down there with her friends before and now she was dead in some faraway place, far from Seaside.  Just one of those significant times ---



I think you are correct about the timing, as it seems I had just returned from a trip to Houston and I know that the news of the "confession" was on the news very late the night before I left ....I was up late packing as usual.... :roll:  :wink:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #553 12/3 - 12/4/2006
Post by: 2NJSons_Mom on December 03, 2006, 07:28:48 PM
Quote from: "Tylergal"
the reason those dates stand out for me was because it was the friday following the infamous confession and we were getting ready to go to seaside.  I thought about Natalee all the way down there.  Several MBs own places at Seaside and I was thinking how sad, that Natalee must have been down there with her friends before and now she was dead in some faraway place, far from Seaside.  Just one of those significant times ---


I remember your trips....so true, we remember things better when something significant was happening at the time.   Ah, yes, the infamous confession that wasn't.  People & things in the case disappear better than Houdini would have imagined.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #553 12/3 - 12/4/2006
Post by: Kat_Gram on December 03, 2006, 07:33:06 PM
Ty for the Homer.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #553 12/3 - 12/4/2006
Post by: cubbeegirl on December 03, 2006, 07:33:52 PM
Quote from: "2NJSons_Mom"
Quote from: "Tylergal"
the reason those dates stand out for me was because it was the friday following the infamous confession and we were getting ready to go to seaside.  I thought about Natalee all the way down there.  Several MBs own places at Seaside and I was thinking how sad, that Natalee must have been down there with her friends before and now she was dead in some faraway place, far from Seaside.  Just one of those significant times ---


I remember your trips....so true, we remember things better when something significant was happening at the time.   Ah, yes, the infamous confession that wasn't.  People & things in the case disappear better than Houdini would have imagined.



yep...


Title: Lively Case Discussion #553 12/3 - 12/4/2006
Post by: Kat_Gram on December 03, 2006, 07:34:55 PM
Quote from: "Kat_Gram"
Ty for the Homer.

Hey, where did he go ? I put him in my Phorobucket and then what ?
Go to profile and is it image or url ?


Title: Lively Case Discussion #553 12/3 - 12/4/2006
Post by: Florida on December 03, 2006, 07:34:59 PM
Quote from: "memphis"
Forgive me for being a little off the current topic....just working on a theory....

I believe I saw Florida post modeling pictures of Guido (which I had seen) and GVC. Is it common knowledge amongst monkeys that GVC modeled also? Does anyone know if it was the same agency?

Tell me if this has already been beat to death and i will shut up.  :)


Klaas is right...the GVC "modeling" pic with makeup & lip gloss came from his Hi5 website...Guido was modeling in the NL....I assume they knew each other in Aruba thru tennis...Maybe they know Hiram also.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #553 12/3 - 12/4/2006
Post by: 2NJSons_Mom on December 03, 2006, 07:36:12 PM
Quote from: "Kat_Gram"
Quote from: "Kat_Gram"
Ty for the Homer.

Hey, where did he go ? I put him in my Phorobucket and then what ?
Go to profile and is it image or url ?


URL in the 3rd option.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #553 12/3 - 12/4/2006
Post by: Florida on December 03, 2006, 07:36:53 PM
Quote from: "memphis"
Quote from: "Shell"
I sure wish my memory was better on this, or that I had saved the link..sigh...but I was reading the other day about a modeling agency that was really a front for porn. Unsuspecting young ladies (girls actually), asked to pose in provacative poses. The method sounded a lot like a Freddy setup. Did anyone else see this story, I think it was on msn news? Or did I dream it...lol


In Aruba?

Glenda?

just kidding...


Sounds like a "Mr. Pink" modeling/porn site to me.....


Title: I am wiped out! Dead ends, missing archives and ARRRR!
Post by: Leslie on December 03, 2006, 07:42:32 PM
I think Paul's banking story was a complete fabrication and the only way he could explain his absence from work and his presence in the area of his home.  There were no gambling profits to deposit by Joran's own admission.  How did Ruth Dijkhoff's name get drawn into it?  The polis must have asked PVDS if anyone could verify his new fangled story.  Maybe Ruth was employed at that bank branch and Paul knew this from prior visits or, his maid, Rita was a relative of Ruth's and mentioned this to Paul.  Maybe Ruth was nowhere near the bank that day but Paul would certainly have known that she had died by the time he made up his story.
I am sure that when someone dies in Aruba - everybody knows within hours or they read it in the newspapers.  That's about the nicest theory I have. The darker version is that she was murdered because she and Paul did see each other on May 30 and not at the bank.  It is so hard to pin down an accurate series of events when we don't know half of the evidence and most of the suspect's are complete liars.  It is so frustrating.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #553 12/3 - 12/4/2006
Post by: AZLady on December 03, 2006, 07:44:03 PM
Hi Monkeys. It's beginning to look a lot like Christmas...   :lol:   I wonder if Kimberly Guilefoil (or however you spell her name) will have anything new tonight or just repeat what we already know.  Any MSM talk about Natalee is good, keeping the case in the news, whatever it takes.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #553 12/3 - 12/4/2006
Post by: Florida on December 03, 2006, 07:44:16 PM
Paulus van der Sloot's June 23 statement:

To your question if I tell you all the things I did on that
Monday the 30th of May 2005, I can state the following. I went to work.
The exact time I cannot remember but I think it was approximately
08.00 hours. I can also remember that around 10.00 hours I went
to the C.M.B. bank. There were long cues at the bank so I left without
having made any transaction and went back to work.

I left my workplace at approximately 15.00 hours. I arrived at the bank at approximately 15.30. I had gone to the C.M.B. bank that is situated in Noord.

   To your question whether I went to the bank without stopping
or going anywhere else, I can state the following. I at least cannot
 remember having been anywhere else. I think I went directly to the bank.
At the bank I talked to Ruth DIJKHOFF. At the bank I deposited the
money that Joran said that he had won in the “Free Tournament in
the Holiday Inn” on the 29th of May 2005. It was approximately
500 Aruban guilders. Joran had given me 100 guilders because he
had taken over my place in the tournament.

Why is Paulus so insistent on depositing this money?


Title: Lively Case Discussion #553 12/3 - 12/4/2006
Post by: Kat_Gram on December 03, 2006, 07:44:55 PM
I think I have to fix something ! !
But it is a happy, smiling kat .


Title: Lively Case Discussion #553 12/3 - 12/4/2006
Post by: Shizaru on December 03, 2006, 07:46:03 PM
mail klaasend


Title: Lively Case Discussion #553 12/3 - 12/4/2006
Post by: AZLady on December 03, 2006, 07:46:45 PM
This is a bit OT, but has anyone else downloaded that annoying IE 7?  It doesn't have a refresh button on the toolbar now, so I have to right-click and get the pop up menu to refresh my screen and see if there are new posts.  Very annoying...


Title: Lively Case Discussion #553 12/3 - 12/4/2006
Post by: SunFreak2 on December 03, 2006, 07:47:56 PM
Hello all you beautiful monkeys!  It's good to be posting here again.

Very interesting info about Ruth Ditjitkof dying the day before Rene Heyningen.  Very suspicious - how many people have been killed to keep their yaps shut?

Ruth, Rene, Pitbull, Robert Benson?

Now back to my bed for me!


Title: Lively Case Discussion #553 12/3 - 12/4/2006
Post by: Florida on December 03, 2006, 07:48:32 PM
Leslie:  From my friend in Aruba about Ruth Dijkhoff...

It would be difficult to find out.. Since I do not know her, it is not something I could ask around the reason of her death.. If on the announcement it says that a donation box will be at the funeral on behalf of Koningin Willemina Fonds or Edmond Harms foundation it is cause she had cancer... If someone was murdered I would have known it.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #553 12/3 - 12/4/2006
Post by: Leslie on December 03, 2006, 07:59:38 PM
Thank you Florida!  Finally I get a hit googling with that info.  So, if she had cancer could she have been well enough to be at the bank on May 30, 2005?


Title: Lively Case Discussion #553 12/3 - 12/4/2006
Post by: Kat_Gram on December 03, 2006, 08:01:48 PM
I can't find it now, but as for lying, the more little details in the PV's, the more chance they are lying about stuff. The details are there to convince you they are telling the truth. Like in Deepak's when he goes into great detail about what how loud the radio is.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #553 12/3 - 12/4/2006
Post by: Tylergal on December 03, 2006, 08:05:20 PM
Quote from: "AZLady"
This is a bit OT, but has anyone else downloaded that annoying IE 7?  It doesn't have a refresh button on the toolbar now, so I have to right-click and get the pop up menu to refresh my screen and see if there are new posts.  Very annoying...

I turned off my automatic upgrade and was told by #1 son not to do it.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #553 12/3 - 12/4/2006
Post by: Katysmom on December 03, 2006, 08:06:54 PM
Quote from: "Kat_Gram"
I can't find it now, but as for lying, the more little details in the PV's, the more chance they are lying about stuff. The details are there to convince you they are telling the truth. Like in Deepak's when he goes into great detail about what how loud the radio is.


Remember when he talked about how loud the radio was, he also mentioned that he had a splitting headache?  How many people crank the volume up on the radio when their head is pounding?  Not me.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #553 12/3 - 12/4/2006
Post by: klaasend on December 03, 2006, 08:07:09 PM
Quote from: "Florida"
Leslie:  From my friend in Aruba about Ruth Dijkhoff...

It would be difficult to find out.. Since I do not know her, it is not something I could ask around the reason of her death.. If on the announcement it says that a donation box will be at the funeral on behalf of Koningin Willemina Fonds or Edmond Harms foundation it is cause she had cancer... If someone was murdered I would have known it.


Florida - could you please clarify before this goes any further.  Is the reference to cancer an example, having nothing to do with Ruth Dijkhoff?  TIA


Title: Lively Case Discussion #553 12/3 - 12/4/2006
Post by: klaasend on December 03, 2006, 08:08:40 PM
The "refresh" on IE7 is right next to the web address bar up at the very top.  To the right of the web url.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #553 12/3 - 12/4/2006
Post by: Florida on December 03, 2006, 08:08:52 PM
Quote from: "klaasend"
Quote from: "Florida"
Leslie:  From my friend in Aruba about Ruth Dijkhoff...

It would be difficult to find out.. Since I do not know her, it is not something I could ask around the reason of her death.. If on the announcement it says that a donation box will be at the funeral on behalf of Koningin Willemina Fonds or Edmond Harms foundation it is cause she had cancer... If someone was murdered I would have known it.


Florida - could you please clarify before this goes any further.  Is the reference to cancer an example, having nothing to do with Ruth Dijkhoff?  TIA


Glad you asked...Yes, she's using it as an example of where you could get more info....


Title: Lively Case Discussion #553 12/3 - 12/4/2006
Post by: klaasend on December 03, 2006, 08:10:25 PM
Quote from: "Florida"
Quote from: "klaasend"
Quote from: "Florida"
Leslie:  From my friend in Aruba about Ruth Dijkhoff...

It would be difficult to find out.. Since I do not know her, it is not something I could ask around the reason of her death.. If on the announcement it says that a donation box will be at the funeral on behalf of Koningin Willemina Fonds or Edmond Harms foundation it is cause she had cancer... If someone was murdered I would have known it.


Florida - could you please clarify before this goes any further.  Is the reference to cancer an example, having nothing to do with Ruth Dijkhoff?  TIA


Glad you asked...Yes, she's using it as an example of where you could get more info....


Thanks, that's what I thought.  So your friend doesn't know and really has no way to easily find out.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #553 12/3 - 12/4/2006
Post by: Florida on December 03, 2006, 08:11:53 PM
Exactly....


Title: Lively Case Discussion #553 12/3 - 12/4/2006
Post by: justinsmama on December 03, 2006, 08:28:20 PM
Quote from: "Kat_Gram"
Quote from: "Lala'sMom"
Nonesy
Email coming your way...don't get lost in all that dough...I don't have a dough extractor handy.   :lol:

A dough extractor ? Could I use that on my bum ?


Seeing as how I just spent the last hour unclogging the toilet (no, not Aruba), I figure I am now an expert at suctioning out items. I'll be on hand to extricate nonesy, if need be. Any other takers?


Title: Lively Case Discussion #553 12/3 - 12/4/2006
Post by: Florida on December 03, 2006, 08:29:05 PM
Maybe...Hopefully, she can find out where the deceased
Ruth Dijkhoff-Holtman worked...


Title: Lively Case Discussion #553 12/3 - 12/4/2006
Post by: Tylergal on December 03, 2006, 08:50:04 PM
I tried to research at those websites on the cancer fund, but was unable to find a list of benefactor/donor/recipients, etc.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #553 12/3 - 12/4/2006
Post by: Dana on December 03, 2006, 08:53:26 PM
For those of you that have had problems downloading or playing Fridays show, I am re airing it now on the scared maonkeys radio stream.

Dana


Title: Lively Case Discussion #553 12/3 - 12/4/2006
Post by: 2NJSons_Mom on December 03, 2006, 08:53:35 PM
Quote from: "Florida"
Paulus van der Sloot's June 23 statement:

To your question if I tell you all the things I did on that
Monday the 30th of May 2005, I can state the following. I went to work.
The exact time I cannot remember but I think it was approximately
08.00 hours. I can also remember that around 10.00 hours I went
to the C.M.B. bank. There were long cues at the bank so I left without
having made any transaction and went back to work.

I left my workplace at approximately 15.00 hours. I arrived at the bank at approximately 15.30. I had gone to the C.M.B. bank that is situated in Noord.

   To your question whether I went to the bank without stopping
or going anywhere else, I can state the following. I at least cannot
 remember having been anywhere else. I think I went directly to the bank.
At the bank I talked to Ruth DIJKHOFF. At the bank I deposited the
money that Joran said that he had won in the “Free Tournament in
the Holiday Inn” on the 29th of May 2005. It was approximately
500 Aruban guilders. Joran had given me 100 guilders because he
had taken over my place in the tournament.

Why is Paulus so insistent on depositing this money?


This is the grey area...if it was a free tournament, which could be no $ exchanged, but I may be inexperienced in gambling sessions.  If Joran has stated that he played until he lost and then went to the BlackJack tables, then, where did this 100 florins come from?  Maybe I am just not with the program.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #553 12/3 - 12/4/2006
Post by: klaasend on December 03, 2006, 08:54:18 PM
Quote from: "Dana"
For those of you that have had problems downloading or playing Fridays show, I am re airing it now on the scared maonkeys radio stream.

Dana

Thanks Dana!


Title: Lively Case Discussion #553 12/3 - 12/4/2006
Post by: 2NJSons_Mom on December 03, 2006, 08:54:30 PM
Oops...said florins but I guess it should have been guilders...


Title: Lively Case Discussion #553 12/3 - 12/4/2006
Post by: Florida on December 03, 2006, 08:55:52 PM
Not sure...but, it seems Leslie may have found something....

Thank you Florida! Finally I get a hit googling with that info. So, if she had cancer could she have been well enough to be at the bank on May 30, 2005?

All we need to know is where Ruth Dijkhoff-Holtman worked.....


Title: Lively Case Discussion #553 12/3 - 12/4/2006
Post by: IndyDan on December 03, 2006, 09:02:29 PM
The VanDerSloots with assistance from the Kalpoes are responsible for the disappearance and death of Natalee Holloway. Only idiots believe otherwise.
Solve the COVERUP and the VanDerSloots, along with all the young Dutch boy sporters go down.
Its become solving the coverup thats taken center stage, solve the coverup and you solve the crime.
Uncovering the Coverup will take down more than just the raping-murdering VanDerSloot family. It will take them all down.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #553 12/3 - 12/4/2006
Post by: Kat_Gram on December 03, 2006, 09:02:46 PM
I have Dana on. Listen to Jossy again.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #553 12/3 - 12/4/2006
Post by: Anna on December 03, 2006, 09:04:34 PM
Quote from: "Dana"
For those of you that have had problems downloading or playing Fridays show, I am re airing it now on the scared maonkeys radio stream.

Dana



Good Evening, Monkeys,

This might be a good time for those with problems accessing Dana's program to work on them while it is a repeat.

Just a thought.. . . . . .


(http://i15.photobucket.com/albums/a360/AnnaBlueSkies/Greetings/Holidays%20and%20BD/thCopy_of_house.gif)


Title: Lively Case Discussion #553 12/3 - 12/4/2006
Post by: IndyDan on December 03, 2006, 09:12:29 PM
Quote from: "klaasend"
Quote from: "Tylergal"
Quote from: "klaasend"
My point of posting that photo is, we don't know who claims to have seen Natalee doing coke.  We don't know if it's a bogus witness or someone who really thinks they saw Natalee.  The thing is, this girl could be mistaken for Natalee, IMO.  Not saying this girl would do drugs, just trying to make a point.


She could be make to look like she was Natalee shopping in a jeweler or using her ATM or offering someone coke, especially if a key reporter who is good with photography, and knows how to photoshop a little and lie a lot had anything to do with it.

Exactly  :wink:


NO WAY in hell Natalee Hollaway did cocaine, no way no how. If anyone can prove this I'll do one of those Samurai knife in the gut belly opening suicides on National TV.  Natalee never saw much less touched coke. This is just smear shit planted by the coverup team.  
I hate these people who want these murderers to go free. What kind of animals are they?


Title: Lively Case Discussion #553 12/3 - 12/4/2006
Post by: crazybabyborg on December 03, 2006, 09:19:02 PM
Hola Monkeys!

I've got to go back-read, but wanted to say HI!


Title: Lively Case Discussion #553 12/3 - 12/4/2006
Post by: Florida on December 03, 2006, 09:19:56 PM
Quote from: "2NJSons_Mom"


This is the grey area...if it was a free tournament, which could be no $ exchanged, but I may be inexperienced in gambling sessions.  If Joran has stated that he played until he lost and then went to the BlackJack tables, then, where did this 100 florins come from?  Maybe I am just not with the program.


This IS the grey area...How Joran lost at the Free Tournament & won at the blackjack tables...Where Guido MAY mave been dealing.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #553 12/3 - 12/4/2006
Post by: Katysmom on December 03, 2006, 09:21:44 PM
Quote from: "Florida"
Quote from: "2NJSons_Mom"


This is the grey area...if it was a free tournament, which could be no $ exchanged, but I may be inexperienced in gambling sessions.  If Joran has stated that he played until he lost and then went to the BlackJack tables, then, where did this 100 florins come from?  Maybe I am just not with the program.


This IS the grey area...How Joran lost at the Free Tournament & won at the blackjack tables...Where Guido MAY mave been dealing.


Was there even a free tournament?  I've been to a few casinos in my life and never recall them haveing free tournaments.  They are in the business of makeing money, and there's no money to be made useing fake money.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #553 12/3 - 12/4/2006
Post by: justinsmama on December 03, 2006, 09:25:29 PM
Where is this pic of supposedly Natalee?


Title: Lively Case Discussion #553 12/3 - 12/4/2006
Post by: Kat_Gram on December 03, 2006, 09:25:40 PM
Jossy just confirmed that it was the first search. Where Ben Vocking was there. Admissions that all three had sex with Natalee as she was goin in and out of it.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #553 12/3 - 12/4/2006
Post by: Florida on December 03, 2006, 09:32:16 PM
"In and out of consciousness"
Symptoms of GHB...
I know, unfortunately.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #553 12/3 - 12/4/2006
Post by: justinsmama on December 03, 2006, 09:32:56 PM
Quote from: "Kat_Gram"
Jossy just confirmed that it was the first search. Where Ben Vocking was there. Admissions that all three had sex with Natalee as she was goin in and out of it.


I knew it. That was reported very early. It is also when I knew (instinctively) that she had not been a willing participant.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #553 12/3 - 12/4/2006
Post by: crazybabyborg on December 03, 2006, 09:35:51 PM
Justins.................did you see the avatar Klaas fixed for you? It's MUCH improved from mine.!


Title: Lively Case Discussion #553 12/3 - 12/4/2006
Post by: klaasend on December 03, 2006, 09:36:12 PM
Thanks to Daniel at FOB, here is part of the De Vries show that talks about Natalee drinking and cocaine. I haven't watched it yet myself.  Will try to get my own screen captures of the document.

Click on the photo to play the video:



(http://i37.photobucket.com/albums/e82/klaasend2/th_drugsdrinks.jpg) (http://s37.photobucket.com/albums/e82/klaasend2/?action=view&current=drugsdrinks.flv)


Title: Lively Case Discussion #553 12/3 - 12/4/2006
Post by: klaasend on December 03, 2006, 09:37:30 PM
(http://i37.photobucket.com/albums/e82/klaasend2/justinsmom2006xmas.gif)


http://i37.photobucket.com/albums/e82/klaasend2/justinsmom2006xmas.gif


Title: Lively Case Discussion #553 12/3 - 12/4/2006
Post by: Florida on December 03, 2006, 09:39:40 PM
Quote from: "Florida"
"In and out of consciousness"
Symptoms of GHB...
I know, unfortunately.


IT CAN'T BE REAL....

You think you are dreaming the whole thing.....


Title: Lively Case Discussion #553 12/3 - 12/4/2006
Post by: crazybabyborg on December 03, 2006, 09:39:53 PM
The link to DeVries show says that Natalee became very intoxicated and had to be escorted back to her room. When are they saying this happened?


Title: Lively Case Discussion #553 12/3 - 12/4/2006
Post by: crazybabyborg on December 03, 2006, 09:42:37 PM
I distinctly recall the MB girls being interviewed and saying that Natalee drank. I also distinctly recall they said she was NEVER out of control or severely intoxicated.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #553 12/3 - 12/4/2006
Post by: Anna on December 03, 2006, 09:44:03 PM
Quote from: "IndyDan"
[
NO WAY in hell Natalee Hollaway did cocaine, no way no how. If anyone can prove this I'll do one of those Samurai knife in the gut belly opening suicides on National TV.  Natalee never saw much less touched coke. This is just smear shit planted by the coverup team.  
I hate these people who want these murderers to go free. What kind of animals are they?



Exactly, Indy,

I have been flamed for saying this, too, but like you, I just don't see it.  And NOT because I don't think drug addictions cross socio-economic boundaries and that anyone can end up addicted or in a crack house, etc. but she was only missing a few hours, for crying out loud!

I just don't think The first minute she was out of sight of the group she headed for a cocaine dealer or checked into a crackhouse.  I doubt if she or most of that little group would know cocaine if they tripped over it.  One of my kids has been in Birmingham in school for eight years and says he has never seen cocaine.  Ecstasy, crystal meth, uppers, downers for studying but not powder form cocaine but plenty of booze.  Lots of the med school kids are real health freaks and just don't do much of that stuff.

She did not have any history of use of cocaine and I do NOT believe the statement deVries is quoting is from one of them.  Some are just making that claim because it is ambiguous.  He might well have considered the source and I do think it is JORAN who said she offered him a line of coke.

BS!!  Yeah, some kids in the ultra conservative Deep South have drug problems and their parents smack them in rehab before they know what hit them especially in places like MB.  And yes, they would know all about it for it is like living in a fish bowl sometimes.  Also schools do drug tests on kids who are in extra curricular activities for insurance purposes, etc.  Everyone would know and yet all say she had nothing to do with drugs.

I need to hear if from some non Aruban and someone other than JORAN the LIAR to believe this for one minute.

Sorry to those who like this idea but I know too many kids this age and just about like these and they are not into cocaine.  Alcohol remains their drug of choice even much more so than their parents from the 60's.  That would be my age group and I have no problem saying somebody does drugs if they do.  Overachiever kids can't do them and keep up with the demands of school these days.

,


Title: Lively Case Discussion #553 12/3 - 12/4/2006
Post by: Anna on December 03, 2006, 09:49:57 PM
Quote from: "justinsmama"
Quote from: "Kat_Gram"
Jossy just confirmed that it was the first search. Where Ben Vocking was there. Admissions that all three had sex with Natalee as she was goin in and out of it.


I knew it. That was reported very early. It is also when I knew (instinctively) that she had not been a willing participant.



It was originally reported in AMDigital in writing that all three claimed to have had sex with her.  Later all that disappeared and now we have the PV's saying no such thing.   :shock: So I wonder which is was.  Did they suspects change their story after consulting with their lawyers or what?

.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #553 12/3 - 12/4/2006
Post by: crazybabyborg on December 03, 2006, 09:50:01 PM
Quote from: "Anna"
Quote from: "IndyDan"
[
NO WAY in hell Natalee Hollaway did cocaine, no way no how. If anyone can prove this I'll do one of those Samurai knife in the gut belly opening suicides on National TV.  Natalee never saw much less touched coke. This is just smear shit planted by the coverup team.  
I hate these people who want these murderers to go free. What kind of animals are they?



Exactly, Indy,

I have been flamed for saying this, too, but like you, I just don't see it.  And NOT because I don't think drug addictions cross socio-economic boundaries and that anyone can end up addicted or in a crack house, etc. but she was only missing a few hours, for crying out loud!

I just don't think The first minute she was out of sight of the group she headed for a cocaine dealer or checked into a crackhouse.  I doubt if she or most of that little group would know cocaine if they tripped over it.  One of my kids has been in Birmingham in school for eight years and says he has never seen cocaine.  Ecstasy, crystal meth, uppers, downers for studying but not powder form cocaine but plenty of booze.  Lots of the med school kids are real health freaks and just don't do much of that stuff.

She did not have any history of use of cocaine and I do NOT believe the statement deVries is quoting is from one of them.  Some are just making that claim because it is ambiguous.  He might well have considered the source and I do think it is JORAN who said she offered him a line of coke.

BS!!  Yeah, some kids in the ultra conservative Deep South have drug problems and their parents smack them in rehab before they know what hit them especially in places like MB.  And yes, they would know all about it for it is like living in a fish bowl sometimes.  Also schools do drug tests on kids who are in extra curricular activities for insurance purposes, etc.  Everyone would know and yet all say she had nothing to do with drugs.

I need to hear if from some non Aruban and someone other than JORAN the LIAR to believe this for one minute.

Sorry to those who like this idea but I know too many kids this age and just about like these and they are not into cocaine.  Alcohol remains their drug of choice even much more so than their parents from the 60's.  That would be my age group and I have no problem saying somebody does drugs if they do.  Overachiever kids can't do them and keep up with the demands of school these days.

,


ABSOLUTELY!!! You do not have the grades to get a scholorship to the University of Alabama with intentions of pre-med and use cocaine for recreation. The well organized Natalee that packed her things to be prepared for her return trip, instead of having her things strewn all over everywhere like 3/4 of the teenagers I know, did not suddenly decide to turn herself into a junkie/druggie. AND she certainly did not seperate herself from the group for the FIRST time in 3 days to pursue that dream!


Title: Lively Case Discussion #553 12/3 - 12/4/2006
Post by: Anna on December 03, 2006, 09:52:43 PM
Jossy said VIDEO tape of Gerald Dompig saying they have enough for an eight year conviction on sexual assault.

None will be glad to hear of that.

 :wink:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #553 12/3 - 12/4/2006
Post by: San on December 03, 2006, 09:53:24 PM
KJ wrote a fax to De Vries saying that this meeting took place.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #553 12/3 - 12/4/2006
Post by: San on December 03, 2006, 09:54:46 PM
De Vries said he doesn't think that Joe Tacopina knows what happened.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #553 12/3 - 12/4/2006
Post by: Angiex911dsptchr on December 03, 2006, 09:54:55 PM
Quote from: "San"
KJ wrote a fax to De Vries saying that this meeting took place.


  :) listening to it SAN~!!!


Title: Lively Case Discussion #553 12/3 - 12/4/2006
Post by: igsigs on December 03, 2006, 09:55:30 PM
FOX

De Vries says "there is no doubt that Carlo said that Joran was involved in Natalee's disappearance. Not even a 1% doubt."


Title: Lively Case Discussion #553 12/3 - 12/4/2006
Post by: Kat_Gram on December 03, 2006, 09:56:26 PM
The intoxicted part came from an FBI 302. It was the Saturday night before her disapperance. Kevin Whatley escorted her to the room. I just took it as meaning he helped her back.
There is nothing in the 302's about ANY drug use whatsoever.
Deepak denied that he did any kind of drugs with her and that he did not see her use any narcotics.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #553 12/3 - 12/4/2006
Post by: San on December 03, 2006, 09:57:56 PM
Jossy said it has been definately been confirmed that they molested the girl while she was going in and out of consciousness.

Jossy has a tape and he has many copies of it.  He usually makes tapes of people he doesn't trust.  If it is not rape, they strangled her and they did a lot of things to her.  He told Jossy many other things.  He said he will present it to the prosecutor when the case goes to court.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #553 12/3 - 12/4/2006
Post by: Lala'sMom on December 03, 2006, 09:58:12 PM
Thanks to all the wonderful monkeys with updates and such.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #553 12/3 - 12/4/2006
Post by: Anna on December 03, 2006, 09:58:22 PM
Quote from: "San"
De Vries said he doesn't think that Joe Tacopina knows what happened.


We have all heard him get his facts scrambled plenty of times.  Yes, I doubt that Antonio Carlo told Joey T about his.  In fact, I would bet Carlo is very surprised that KJ told about it at all.  I would imagine he is highly embarrassed and somewhat mortified that she did.

Joey T will say anything.  Compare and contrast the search done for his client in NYC to that at the Sloots.  His loyalty is for sale to the highest bidder only.  He will say and do anything for a $.  I think there is a word for people like that.

.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #553 12/3 - 12/4/2006
Post by: Katysmom on December 03, 2006, 09:59:26 PM
Quote from: "San"
De Vries said he doesn't think that Joe Tacopina knows what happened.


Does JoeT really think his client told HIM the truth?  I know JoeT has no morals, but in all the legal offices I've worked in, if the defendants lawyer knows for a fact his client is guilty, the only thing he can do is argue for a light sentence; he can't argue for a not guilty verdict.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #553 12/3 - 12/4/2006
Post by: robots on December 03, 2006, 09:59:51 PM
Quote from: "igsigs"
FOX

De Vries says "there is no doubt that Carlo said that Joran was involved in Natalee's disappearance. Not even a 1% doubt."


PAULUS IS A JACKASS  8)


Title: Lively Case Discussion #553 12/3 - 12/4/2006
Post by: Lala'sMom on December 03, 2006, 10:00:32 PM
Quote from: "San"
Jossy said it has been definately been confirmed that they molested the girl while she was going in and out of consciousness.

Jossy has a tape and he has many copies of it.  He usually makes tapes of people he doesn't trust.  If it is not rape, they strangled her and they did a lot of things to her.  He told Jossy many other things.  He said he will present it to the prosecutor when the case goes to court.


Any mention of any others besides JK2 being involved?


Title: Lively Case Discussion #553 12/3 - 12/4/2006
Post by: San on December 03, 2006, 10:00:39 PM
Beth said the only area that was searched were Joran's apartment.  The gounds and others areas were not searched.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #553 12/3 - 12/4/2006
Post by: Jacqueline on December 03, 2006, 10:00:40 PM
Devries:

He admitted there had been a meeting...He did not want to tell us much about it, but we found out there wasa secret meeting with janesen that is highly unusual...that is very strange...also the head pros  admitted that the meeting took place.

in the meetings mr carlo said he had to clear his conscience and that joran played a major part in her disappearance of natalee. he then stated that it was up to police and justice to get the full proof of this.

the pros wrote him a letter and asked for more details and he got scared. This had been a secret meeting and when jk put this on paper he got scared and then wrote her a letter to deny it.

Officials contacted me, and there is really no doubt not for one percent that he said it...

Joe does not know what happened i think, i have a recording with a candid camera that shows the opposite of what he is saying. he is not informed.

Jossy:

the former police said he confirmed that they admitted to the police that they had molested the girl when she was going in and out. I spoke with Dompig and I videotaped it because we do that we people we do not trust.

many people doubt anything i say then once i show the proof everyone becomes silent. i have a transcript and a tape...
I can read a portion, for example when i asked him about the case he said we cannot go because we don 't have a body...look they did alot of things to her.....they themselves said she passed out and they did things to her so she could not defend herself, and that is at least 8 years. he also said you are not talking about joran alone cause the kalpoe bros were present in the car.  

He confirmed that these boys admitted it to the police they molested her. I have not given the tape to anyone yet because there are so many things that happen here, people you can't trust. I will present the tape when they take it to court.

Beth:  so many things have happened in the last 7 days, we hav known all along ....it's just this is affirmation that these things happened with a coverup, this was not our imagination..

two things that were significant...the meeting with kj, and the search warrant....from his show there were people in the justice dept. who blocked alot of that search...devries has this info, this has been part of what he uncovered.

the only room they were allowed to search was jorans apt, not the rest of the grounds...

I think what devries said, with one of joran's first responses was that they took her to his residence....we have four different versions of how he made the one trip home...

coming up:

stunning accusations may land the attorneys in hot water...


Title: Lively Case Discussion #553 12/3 - 12/4/2006
Post by: Angiex911dsptchr on December 03, 2006, 10:01:01 PM
Quote from: "robots"
Quote from: "igsigs"
FOX

De Vries says "there is no doubt that Carlo said that Joran was involved in Natalee's disappearance. Not even a 1% doubt."


PAULUS IS A JACKASS  8)



:)


Title: Lively Case Discussion #553 12/3 - 12/4/2006
Post by: crazybabyborg on December 03, 2006, 10:01:17 PM
FOX: I hope she's right...............and that the water's boiling!!!!


Title: Lively Case Discussion #553 12/3 - 12/4/2006
Post by: igsigs on December 03, 2006, 10:02:14 PM
For De Vries to be that sure his source must be Janssen, IMO.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #553 12/3 - 12/4/2006
Post by: Katysmom on December 03, 2006, 10:02:21 PM
Quote from: "Katysmom"
Quote from: "San"
De Vries said he doesn't think that Joe Tacopina knows what happened.


Does JoeT really think his client told HIM the truth?  I know JoeT has no morals, but in all the legal offices I've worked in, if the defendants lawyer knows for a fact his client is guilty, the only thing he can do is argue for a light sentence; he can't argue for a not guilty verdict.


as a follow-up:  I know many attorneys' who will say the first time they meet with the defendant "if you are guilty, don't tell me"


Title: Lively Case Discussion #553 12/3 - 12/4/2006
Post by: Anna on December 03, 2006, 10:03:21 PM
Quote from: "San"
Jossy said it has been definately been confirmed that they molested the girl while she was going in and out of consciousness.

Jossy has a tape and he has many copies of it.  He usually makes tapes of people he doesn't trust.  If it is not rape, they strangled her and they did a lot of things to her.  He told Jossy many other things.  He said he will present it to the prosecutor when the case goes to court.



 :shock:  :shock:  :shock:

Whoa!  I missed some of this before.  Did what things to her???  :evil: Where are the statements about THAT!!???!!

.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #553 12/3 - 12/4/2006
Post by: klaasend on December 03, 2006, 10:03:58 PM
oops - I just turned the Lineup on now.  Thanks to all for the updates.

Here are a couple of new screen shots.
 

(http://i37.photobucket.com/albums/e82/klaasend2/Cpv5.jpg)

(http://i37.photobucket.com/albums/e82/klaasend2/Cpv4.jpg)

The initials to the left look to me as R.P.B.F. ....maybe?


Title: Lively Case Discussion #553 12/3 - 12/4/2006
Post by: San on December 03, 2006, 10:07:25 PM
Beth said when she thinks back now about the meetings with Karin Janssen and how she treated them just proves they were right and they were never going to do anything with this case.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #553 12/3 - 12/4/2006
Post by: Jacqueline on December 03, 2006, 10:08:34 PM
12/3/06
The Line UP

will the claims made by carlo turn the case around??

Lisa :  Its a big break, the problem as a pros is what can we do with this. whatever happened to natalle happened in the past, not a future crime, i don't know what they can do now.

Brian:   I don't think this testimony will ever see a courtroom. none of this testimony will ever be heard unless joran waives the right to it....

Kim: this does raise issues, that the case was not handled right. people maybe did not follow leads...

Beth, so many things have transpired  , the pros did not communicate with the family like she should have. it is their responsiblity and when i think how kj treated us.....at least this gives us affirmation that we were right and they never had any intention on really pursuing these suspects.

Lisa: even if youdon't think the evidence will get to the courtroom, but kj still should have told the family...i'm not sure why theydid not divulge this info to the familyl you are suppose to be on the same side here.

Brian:  Just like beth said, this investigation is ameture hour, but certainlyu if I am carlo, i am thinking what he should be thinking of what to be doing after his career is over....his career as an attorney will be over in an amount of minutes.

coming up:  Joe M case.....


Title: Lively Case Discussion #553 12/3 - 12/4/2006
Post by: robots on December 03, 2006, 10:09:47 PM
i told you

Tsunami was coming !!!!

 8)


Title: Lively Case Discussion #553 12/3 - 12/4/2006
Post by: crazybabyborg on December 03, 2006, 10:11:12 PM
I missed the first part of Kimberly..............didn't realize it was on. It repeats at 1:00am Eastern.

Beth has an extremely good, slam dunk case against prosecuter's office and others, if she chose to pursue it, IMO. Could she file that in Holland instead of Aruba, by any chance?


Title: Lively Case Discussion #553 12/3 - 12/4/2006
Post by: klaasend on December 03, 2006, 10:11:52 PM
Thanks Jacqueline!!


Title: Lively Case Discussion #553 12/3 - 12/4/2006
Post by: Kat_Gram on December 03, 2006, 10:13:25 PM
Pretty sure the first initial is an R.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #553 12/3 - 12/4/2006
Post by: Anna on December 03, 2006, 10:14:36 PM
Quote from: "igsigs"
For De Vries to be that sure his source must be Janssen, IMO.


Hi, Igs,

I thought San just posted that kj sent him a fax about this so I assume he has it in writing from her that it happened or at least her letter to Carlo asking for more information.

To me, this is a little bit scary as I am afraid she is acting in collusion with Carol to get a mistrial or total dismissal of charges for Joran because of his having inadequate counsel.

It was tried in this area with the attorney for Judith Neeley saying he fell in love with her and so she had inadequate counsel because he was no longer objective, something like that.  So it is a last ditch attorney trick sometimes.

.(http://i15.photobucket.com/albums/a360/AnnaBlueSkies/Greetings/Holidays%20and%20BD/thtag-felinatal-happy2.gif)


Title: Lively Case Discussion #553 12/3 - 12/4/2006
Post by: Florida on December 03, 2006, 10:15:49 PM
Quote from: "Florida"
Quote from: "Florida"
"In and out of consciousness"
Symptoms of GHB...
I know, unfortunately.


IT CAN'T BE REAL....

You think you are dreaming the whole thing.....


You can't prove if it was a dream or reality[/b].....


Title: Lively Case Discussion #553 12/3 - 12/4/2006
Post by: justinsmama on December 03, 2006, 10:16:26 PM
Quote from: "klaasend"
(http://i37.photobucket.com/albums/e82/klaasend2/justinsmom2006xmas.gif)


http://i37.photobucket.com/albums/e82/klaasend2/justinsmom2006xmas.gif


Thanx, Klaas! LOL! Poor CBB tried, bless her!


Title: Lively Case Discussion #553 12/3 - 12/4/2006
Post by: Jacqueline on December 03, 2006, 10:17:58 PM
12/3/06
Kimberly

The Line UP

Joe is sitting in jail...

Feds say he has pocketed over 3 mill in taxes.

Charges include money laundering, and he will not be released from jail because he is a flight risk. They say he has threatned to burn down his ex wifes home...

Beth: Joe has been great for us with our ordeal, joe has helped out us, and others.  As far as what we experienced he has always been there for us, and has been commited and been terrific and I hate that this is happening.  He has been a great friend to us, he never NOT answered his cell phone, he was always encouraging when we were depressed.

I just hate that this is happening, it's a tragedy, and I am standing by him.

Lisa: the crime is called felon in possesion, he is not allowed to have a gun, they had a warrant, the gun was on his night stand. this is a pretty good case for the feds, but i think the good things he has done will help him out in sentencing a bit...but he will do time because he should not have a gun.

Brian:  he is in trouble, there can be no plea bargaining here, it is a mandatory 60 month sentence.....The statute was made a couple of years ago to have a handgun.

Coming up:  The poisoning of the Russian Spy.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #553 12/3 - 12/4/2006
Post by: Anna on December 03, 2006, 10:18:49 PM
.
P.R.S.F.?

.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #553 12/3 - 12/4/2006
Post by: klaasend on December 03, 2006, 10:19:39 PM
Quote from: "Anna"
.
P.R.S.F.?

.

Maybe?


Title: Lively Case Discussion #553 12/3 - 12/4/2006
Post by: crazybabyborg on December 03, 2006, 10:21:48 PM
Tacky Alert.............


Title: Lively Case Discussion #553 12/3 - 12/4/2006
Post by: Angiex911dsptchr on December 03, 2006, 10:22:16 PM
Oh Brother Tacopino on


Title: Lively Case Discussion #553 12/3 - 12/4/2006
Post by: crazybabyborg on December 03, 2006, 10:22:32 PM
Jossy is senile???? :twisted:  :twisted:  :twisted:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #553 12/3 - 12/4/2006
Post by: igsigs on December 03, 2006, 10:23:25 PM
Emergency call-in by TACO!

Desperation...


Title: Lively Case Discussion #553 12/3 - 12/4/2006
Post by: robots on December 03, 2006, 10:23:56 PM
NEWSFLASH    NEWSFLASH  

  ---------------NEWS ALERT ------------------



it is being reported  that JORAN, the LIE FACTORY
the GAMBLING ADDICT, the DRUNKARD, and the all-around EVIL PERSON

has been seen attempting to ride his DORK-BIKE with Deepak and Satish
in HOT PERSUIT.

this has been Robots reporting  



 :twisted:  :twisted:  :twisted:  :twisted:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #553 12/3 - 12/4/2006
Post by: Angiex911dsptchr on December 03, 2006, 10:24:17 PM
Quote from: "crazybabyborg"
Jossy is senile???? :twisted:  :twisted:  :twisted:


 Sounds like Tacopino got crap in his pants.. Guess he will once this video comes out..  he got diarea of the mouth.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #553 12/3 - 12/4/2006
Post by: mishy on December 03, 2006, 10:24:54 PM
Quote from: "Jacqueline"
12/3/06
Kimberly

The Line UP

Joe is sitting in jail...

Feds say he has pocketed over 3 mill in taxes.

Charges include money laundering, and he will not be released from jail because he is a flight risk. They say he has threatned to burn down his ex wifes home...

Beth: Joe has been great for us with our ordeal, joe has helped out us, and others.  As far as what we experienced he has always been there for us, and has been commited and been terrific and I hate that this is happening.  He has been a great friend to us, he never NOT answered his cell phone, he was always encouraging when we were depressed.

I just hate that this is happening, it's a tragedy, and I am standing by him.

Lisa: the crime is called felon in possesion, he is not allowed to have a gun, they had a warrant, the gun was on his night stand. this is a pretty good case for the feds, but i think the good things he has done will help him out in sentencing a bit...but he will do time because he should not have a gun.

Brian:  he is in trouble, there can be no plea bargaining here, it is a mandatory 60 month sentence.....The statute was made a couple of years ago to have a handgun.

Coming up:  The poisoning of the Russian Spy.


I so hate to hear this about Joe M. Thing is, for a man with all the money he has, what's 3 mil?


Title: Lively Case Discussion #553 12/3 - 12/4/2006
Post by: Angiex911dsptchr on December 03, 2006, 10:25:06 PM
Quote from: "igsigs"
Emergency call-in by TACO!

Desperation...


 Hell he may have a coronary on  air  ROFL  Damn hes excited


Title: Lively Case Discussion #553 12/3 - 12/4/2006
Post by: crazybabyborg on December 03, 2006, 10:25:14 PM
Quote from: "Angiex911dsptchr"
Quote from: "crazybabyborg"
Jossy is senile???? :twisted:  :twisted:  :twisted:


 Sounds like Tacopino got crap in his pants.. Guess he will once this video comes out..  he got diarea of the mouth.


All the more reason for Tacky to sit down.....HARD!  :wink:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #553 12/3 - 12/4/2006
Post by: Anna on December 03, 2006, 10:25:15 PM
Probably Bouti's real name.  I wonder if anyone told deVries that Bouti lives in the bushes and sits on a lawn chair there spying on the HI guests like a pervert all the time??  DeVries would have no way of knowing this person has fried their brain so totally already much like Joran is on the way to doing himself.


If it is Bouti, someone should tell devries and also that it is Dompig's brotherinlaw who will basically say anything like Joey T for a fix the way JoeT will for a $.

.(http://i15.photobucket.com/albums/a360/AnnaBlueSkies/Greetings/Holidays%20and%20BD/thk035.gif)(http://i15.photobucket.com/albums/a360/AnnaBlueSkies/Greetings/Holidays%20and%20BD/thk035.gif)(http://i15.photobucket.com/albums/a360/AnnaBlueSkies/Greetings/Holidays%20and%20BD/thk035.gif)(http://i15.photobucket.com/albums/a360/AnnaBlueSkies/Greetings/Holidays%20and%20BD/thk035.gif)(http://i15.photobucket.com/albums/a360/AnnaBlueSkies/Greetings/Holidays%20and%20BD/thk035.gif)

.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #553 12/3 - 12/4/2006
Post by: Jacqueline on December 03, 2006, 10:25:18 PM
Joe t just called in..
I have not been watching a breaking develpment, i have been watching nonsense, all false facts.

I don't worry about Jossy...

Carlo said NOTHING that remotely resembles what devries is saying he said.  He still reps joran, he was just in court with jk on thrsday..

Let us not assume this is fact and that he will lose his law practice.

(JOE SOUNDS MAD LOL)

These are all falsw allegations, like the one made by beth made that joran is a sexual predator..

Lets stop talking about all these false facts.

THEY CAN"T solve the case, jossy is a bafoon....
he is the one who led the police in aruba have led him on more wild goose chases...the last i heard about dompig is he got fired for going on national tv and he does not believe that joran has done it.

JOE IS screaming now....he is really acting like a jerk...


Title: Lively Case Discussion #553 12/3 - 12/4/2006
Post by: Dana on December 03, 2006, 10:25:39 PM
Quote from: "Angiex911dsptchr"
Quote from: "crazybabyborg"
Jossy is senile???? :twisted:  :twisted:  :twisted:


 Sounds like Tacopino got crap in his pants.. Guess he will once this video comes out..  he got diarea of the mouth.


I missed it does Joe T now know about the Jossy tape ?


Title: Lively Case Discussion #553 12/3 - 12/4/2006
Post by: Angiex911dsptchr on December 03, 2006, 10:26:52 PM
Quote from: "crazybabyborg"
Quote from: "Angiex911dsptchr"
Quote from: "crazybabyborg"
Jossy is senile???? :twisted:  :twisted:  :twisted:


 Sounds like Tacopino got crap in his pants.. Guess he will once this video comes out..  he got diarea of the mouth.


All the more reason for Tacky to sit down.....HARD!  :wink:


 ROFL CBB!!! :)


Title: Lively Case Discussion #553 12/3 - 12/4/2006
Post by: klaasend on December 03, 2006, 10:27:13 PM
Wow, real professional Joe T (NOT)


Title: Lively Case Discussion #553 12/3 - 12/4/2006
Post by: mishy on December 03, 2006, 10:27:14 PM
Quote from: "Angiex911dsptchr"
Quote from: "crazybabyborg"
Jossy is senile???? :twisted:  :twisted:  :twisted:


 Sounds like Tacopino got crap in his pants.. Guess he will once this video comes out..  he got diarea of the mouth.


Grasping at which straw he's going to stick up his nose and snort with next...


Title: Lively Case Discussion #553 12/3 - 12/4/2006
Post by: Jacqueline on December 03, 2006, 10:27:15 PM
OMG did you guys hear how pannnicky and pissed joe was?  If all this is nonsense than why did he get his panties in a bunch??? :shock:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #553 12/3 - 12/4/2006
Post by: robots on December 03, 2006, 10:27:26 PM
JOSSY is a ROCK !

JOE T. is a CROCK !


JOR T needs to lay off the CRACK PIPE

it is affecting his BRAIN  8)


Title: Lively Case Discussion #553 12/3 - 12/4/2006
Post by: Angiex911dsptchr on December 03, 2006, 10:27:43 PM
Quote from: "Dana"
Quote from: "Angiex911dsptchr"
Quote from: "crazybabyborg"
Jossy is senile???? :twisted:  :twisted:  :twisted:


 Sounds like Tacopino got crap in his pants.. Guess he will once this video comes out..  he got diarea of the mouth.


I missed it does Joe T now know about the Jossy tape ?


  Dana he called into FOX.. the man was dang near screaming in the phone.  Of course hes saying its all BS!


Title: Lively Case Discussion #553 12/3 - 12/4/2006
Post by: igsigs on December 03, 2006, 10:28:26 PM
Quote from: "Angiex911dsptchr"
Quote from: "igsigs"
Emergency call-in by TACO!

Desperation...


 Hell he may have a coronary on  air  ROFL  Damn hes excited

Ang i was gonna say that TACO sounded like he was soiling himself on-air...but you beat me to it re: crap.  lol


Title: Lively Case Discussion #553 12/3 - 12/4/2006
Post by: robots on December 03, 2006, 10:28:31 PM
Attention JOE T.

take a deep BREATH and let the Smoke out  :lol:  :lol:  :lol:  :lol:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #553 12/3 - 12/4/2006
Post by: Angiex911dsptchr on December 03, 2006, 10:28:57 PM
Quote from: "Jacqueline"
OMG did you guys hear how pannnicky and pissed joe was?  If all this is nonsense than why did he get his panties in a bunch??? :shock:


 My thoughts exactly Jackie..  !


Title: Lively Case Discussion #553 12/3 - 12/4/2006
Post by: Dana on December 03, 2006, 10:29:11 PM
Quote from: "Angiex911dsptchr"
Quote from: "Dana"
Quote from: "Angiex911dsptchr"
Quote from: "crazybabyborg"
Jossy is senile???? :twisted:  :twisted:  :twisted:


 Sounds like Tacopino got crap in his pants.. Guess he will once this video comes out..  he got diarea of the mouth.


I missed it does Joe T now know about the Jossy tape ?


  Dana he called into FOX.. the man was dang near screaming in the phone.  Of course hes saying its all BS!


well if its BS he better not stand infront of the fan it will hit very soon.
:-)


Title: Lively Case Discussion #553 12/3 - 12/4/2006
Post by: Jacqueline on December 03, 2006, 10:29:37 PM
Quote from: "Angiex911dsptchr"
Quote from: "Dana"
Quote from: "Angiex911dsptchr"
Quote from: "crazybabyborg"
Jossy is senile???? :twisted:  :twisted:  :twisted:


 Sounds like Tacopino got crap in his pants.. Guess he will once this video comes out..  he got diarea of the mouth.


I missed it does Joe T now know about the Jossy tape ?


  Dana he called into FOX.. the man was dang near screaming in the phone.  Of course hes saying its all BS!


By the end of the conversation he was hitting those high notes...

Very unprofessional and he reeked of desperation.....


Title: Lively Case Discussion #553 12/3 - 12/4/2006
Post by: Angiex911dsptchr on December 03, 2006, 10:29:40 PM
Quote from: "igsigs"
Quote from: "Angiex911dsptchr"
Quote from: "igsigs"
Emergency call-in by TACO!

Desperation...


 Hell he may have a coronary on  air  ROFL  Damn hes excited

Ang i was gonna say that TACO sounded like he was soiling himself on-air...but you beat me to it re: crap.  lol


  :( Igs!!  Great minds hon!!  LOL


Title: Lively Case Discussion #553 12/3 - 12/4/2006
Post by: Anna on December 03, 2006, 10:30:04 PM
.

Joe T has a high, shrill voice when he is excited and upset like this.  Reminds me of how Arlene used to yell, too, but never Beth.  Imagine if Beth carried on like Joey T just did what would be said about her?

He gets higher pitched and more shrill the bigger his lie I think, lol!  Sounded hysterical and like a little girl about to start crying!!  Disgraceful.

. :roll:


(http://i15.photobucket.com/albums/a360/AnnaBlueSkies/Greetings/Holidays%20and%20BD/thdekerstman.gif)


Title: Lively Case Discussion #553 12/3 - 12/4/2006
Post by: Angiex911dsptchr on December 03, 2006, 10:30:33 PM
Quote from: "Dana"
Quote from: "Angiex911dsptchr"
Quote from: "Dana"
Quote from: "Angiex911dsptchr"
Quote from: "crazybabyborg"
Jossy is senile???? :twisted:  :twisted:  :twisted:


 Sounds like Tacopino got crap in his pants.. Guess he will once this video comes out..  he got diarea of the mouth.


I missed it does Joe T now know about the Jossy tape ?


  Dana he called into FOX.. the man was dang near screaming in the phone.  Of course hes saying its all BS!


well if its BS he better not stand infront of the fan it will hit very soon.
:-)


  ROFL~!! :wink:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #553 12/3 - 12/4/2006
Post by: crazybabyborg on December 03, 2006, 10:30:52 PM
Quote from: "Angiex911dsptchr"
Quote from: "Dana"
Quote from: "Angiex911dsptchr"
Quote from: "crazybabyborg"
Jossy is senile???? :twisted:  :twisted:  :twisted:


 Sounds like Tacopino got crap in his pants.. Guess he will once this video comes out..  he got diarea of the mouth.


I missed it does Joe T now know about the Jossy tape ?


  Dana he called into FOX.. the man was dang near screaming in the phone.  Of course hes saying its all BS!


Dana............if you can catch the rerun, it's worth the effort. Voice went up in decibels and a full octive. Don't most men do that as a grip around the jewels tighten???  :wink:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #553 12/3 - 12/4/2006
Post by: robots on December 03, 2006, 10:31:43 PM
if you add JOE T. and PAULUS and JORAN together

what do you get ?












 8) 3 losers


Title: Lively Case Discussion #553 12/3 - 12/4/2006
Post by: Jacqueline on December 03, 2006, 10:31:57 PM
Quote from: "Anna"
.

Joe T has a high, shrill voice when he is excited and upset like this.  Reminds me of how Arlene used to yell, too, but never Beth.  Imagine if Beth carried on like Joey T just did what would be said about her?

He gets higher pitched and more shrill the bigger his lie I think, lol!  Sounded hysterical and like a little girl about to start crying!!  Disgraceful.

. :roll:

Yes, just like a little girl...wah wah wah....


(http://i15.photobucket.com/albums/a360/AnnaBlueSkies/Greetings/Holidays%20and%20BD/thdekerstman.gif)


Title: Lively Case Discussion #553 12/3 - 12/4/2006
Post by: crazybabyborg on December 03, 2006, 10:32:11 PM
Anna.............I love the candle line! You're just a wealth of Christmas!


Title: Lively Case Discussion #553 12/3 - 12/4/2006
Post by: Katysmom on December 03, 2006, 10:32:26 PM
Quote from: "Angiex911dsptchr"
Quote from: "Jacqueline"
OMG did you guys hear how pannnicky and pissed joe was?  If all this is nonsense than why did he get his panties in a bunch??? :shock:


 My thoughts exactly Jackie..  !


Age old saying:  Me thinks he douth protest too much!


Title: Lively Case Discussion #553 12/3 - 12/4/2006
Post by: Dana on December 03, 2006, 10:32:55 PM
Quote from: "Jacqueline"
Quote from: "Anna"
.

Joe T has a high, shrill voice when he is excited and upset like this.  Reminds me of how Arlene used to yell, too, but never Beth.  Imagine if Beth carried on like Joey T just did what would be said about her?

He gets higher pitched and more shrill the bigger his lie I think, lol!  Sounded hysterical and like a little girl about to start crying!!  Disgraceful.

. :roll:

Yes, just like a little girl...wah wah wah....

But what was he saying ?
Whtats all BS ?



(http://i15.photobucket.com/albums/a360/AnnaBlueSkies/Greetings/Holidays%20and%20BD/thdekerstman.gif)


Title: Lively Case Discussion #553 12/3 - 12/4/2006
Post by: robots on December 03, 2006, 10:33:09 PM
save yourself JOE !!

go to church !!  pray for forgiveness

get away from the DARKSIDE  8)


Title: Lively Case Discussion #553 12/3 - 12/4/2006
Post by: crazybabyborg on December 03, 2006, 10:33:48 PM
Quote from: "robots"
if you add JOE T. and PAULUS and JORAN together

what do you get ?














 8) 3 losers


Reason to pull on the hip boots and find a shovel?


Title: Lively Case Discussion #553 12/3 - 12/4/2006
Post by: Jacqueline on December 03, 2006, 10:34:00 PM
Remember those commercials..

Is it live, or is it memorex???

I think a couple of my glasses shattered after Tapioca's Tirade!


Title: Lively Case Discussion #553 12/3 - 12/4/2006
Post by: Angiex911dsptchr on December 03, 2006, 10:34:17 PM
Quote from: "Katysmom"
Quote from: "Angiex911dsptchr"
Quote from: "Jacqueline"
OMG did you guys hear how pannnicky and pissed joe was?  If all this is nonsense than why did he get his panties in a bunch??? :shock:


 My thoughts exactly Jackie..  !


Age old saying:  Me thinks he douth protest too much!


 The man is probably changins his panties as we type. maybe Joran has an extra pair of Tommy Hillfiggers he can give him!  :twisted:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #553 12/3 - 12/4/2006
Post by: cubbeegirl on December 03, 2006, 10:34:35 PM
Well... Joe Taco certainly showed his azz with that phone call.....


Title: Lively Case Discussion #553 12/3 - 12/4/2006
Post by: Katysmom on December 03, 2006, 10:35:27 PM
Quote from: "cubbeegirl"
Well... Joe Taco certainly showed his azz with that phone call.....


He just proved to the world what a jerk he is.  No way would I want this man representing me in a court of law!!!


Title: Lively Case Discussion #553 12/3 - 12/4/2006
Post by: Anna on December 03, 2006, 10:35:32 PM
Quote from: "Dana"
Quote from: "Angiex911dsptchr"
Quote from: "crazybabyborg"
Jossy is senile???? :twisted:  :twisted:  :twisted:


 Sounds like Tacopino got crap in his pants.. Guess he will once this video comes out..  he got diarea of the mouth.


I missed it does Joe T now know about the Jossy tape ?


Yes but he said in a high shrill voice that Jossy is a buffoon and the last he heard Dompig was fired for going on TV and saying he didn't think Joran did it!  Lie on top of lie.

But he sounded just awful like high and shrill but with an undertone of whine in it more like he was going to cry than punch somebody, if you know what I mean.  Was VERY ENTERTAINING!!  :D  :D  :D

.(http://i15.photobucket.com/albums/a360/AnnaBlueSkies/Greetings/Holidays%20and%20BD/thmerryxmass.jpg)


Title: Lively Case Discussion #553 12/3 - 12/4/2006
Post by: Jacqueline on December 03, 2006, 10:35:43 PM
Quote from: "Angiex911dsptchr"
Quote from: "Katysmom"
Quote from: "Angiex911dsptchr"
Quote from: "Jacqueline"
OMG did you guys hear how pannnicky and pissed joe was?  If all this is nonsense than why did he get his panties in a bunch??? :shock:


 My thoughts exactly Jackie..  !


Age old saying:  Me thinks he douth protest too much!


 The man is probably changins his panties as we type. maybe Joran has an extra pair of Tommy Hillfiggers he can give him!  :twisted:


More like it something from Victorias Secret!~ :wink:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #553 12/3 - 12/4/2006
Post by: Lala'sMom on December 03, 2006, 10:36:33 PM
Quote from: "crazybabyborg"
Jossy is senile???? :twisted:  :twisted:  :twisted:



Did he really say that??? :shock:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #553 12/3 - 12/4/2006
Post by: Dana on December 03, 2006, 10:36:34 PM
Quote from: "Anna"
Quote from: "Dana"
Quote from: "Angiex911dsptchr"
Quote from: "crazybabyborg"
Jossy is senile???? :twisted:  :twisted:  :twisted:


 Sounds like Tacopino got crap in his pants.. Guess he will once this video comes out..  he got diarea of the mouth.


I missed it does Joe T now know about the Jossy tape ?


Yes but he said in a high shrill voice that Jossy is a buffoon and the last he heard Dompig was fired for going on TV and saying he didn't think Joran did it!  Lie on top of lie.

But he sounded just awful like high and shrill but with an undertone of whine in it more like he was going to cry than punch somebody, if you know what I mean.  Was VERY ENTERTAINING!!  :D  :D  :D

.(http://i15.photobucket.com/albums/a360/AnnaBlueSkies/Greetings/Holidays%20and%20BD/thmerryxmass.jpg)


Jossy is a buffoon because he is saying he has a tape?


Title: Lively Case Discussion #553 12/3 - 12/4/2006
Post by: crazybabyborg on December 03, 2006, 10:36:55 PM
Tacky said that Carlo and KJ were just in court dropping the charges against Joran and that Carlo did not meet with her in a secret meeting and never said he suspected Joran of anything. He said that Beth lied on the civil suit affidavit, citing a witness had information that the witness denied. He said Jossy had led ALE on a bunch of wild goose chases and that he was senile and a baffoon. Let me think, Anna, what else..........


Title: Lively Case Discussion #553 12/3 - 12/4/2006
Post by: Angiex911dsptchr on December 03, 2006, 10:37:39 PM
Quote from: "Jacqueline"
Quote from: "Angiex911dsptchr"
Quote from: "Katysmom"
Quote from: "Angiex911dsptchr"
Quote from: "Jacqueline"
OMG did you guys hear how pannnicky and pissed joe was?  If all this is nonsense than why did he get his panties in a bunch??? :shock:


 My thoughts exactly Jackie..  !


Age old saying:  Me thinks he douth protest too much!


 The man is probably changins his panties as we type. maybe Joran has an extra pair of Tommy Hillfiggers he can give him!  :twisted:


More like it something from Victorias Secret!~ :wink:


  ROFL  Sistah!!  I choked !!!  :) :) :) :)


Title: Lively Case Discussion #553 12/3 - 12/4/2006
Post by: Dana on December 03, 2006, 10:37:43 PM
Quote from: "crazybabyborg"
Tacky said that Carlo and KJ were just in court dropping the charges against Joran and that Carlo did not meet with her in a secret meeting and never said he suspected Joran of anything. He said that Beth lied on the civil suit affidavit, citing a witness had information that the witness denied. He said Jossy had led ALE on a bunch of wild goose chases and that he was senile and a baffoon. Let me think, Anna, what else..........


ahh ok so he never mentioned the tape?


Title: Lively Case Discussion #553 12/3 - 12/4/2006
Post by: Jacqueline on December 03, 2006, 10:38:04 PM
Joe implied that jossy was a bafoon because he does not present true facts...he spins things and sent the aruba police on more wild goosechases and that he hindered the investigation.

I did not hear him call him senile, but I could have missed it with my typing....


Title: Lively Case Discussion #553 12/3 - 12/4/2006
Post by: Angiex911dsptchr on December 03, 2006, 10:38:29 PM
Quote from: "Lala'sMom"
Quote from: "crazybabyborg"
Jossy is senile???? :twisted:  :twisted:  :twisted:



Did he really say that??? :shock:


 YEP  Lalas  I heard it with my own wittle ears too!


Title: Lively Case Discussion #553 12/3 - 12/4/2006
Post by: crazybabyborg on December 03, 2006, 10:39:18 PM
Tacky went on to ridicule Jossy for saying he would present the prosecutor with the evidence before the trial. He said, yeah right, why not now?


Title: Lively Case Discussion #553 12/3 - 12/4/2006
Post by: Jacqueline on December 03, 2006, 10:39:43 PM
Quote from: "Dana"
Quote from: "crazybabyborg"
Tacky said that Carlo and KJ were just in court dropping the charges against Joran and that Carlo did not meet with her in a secret meeting and never said he suspected Joran of anything. He said that Beth lied on the civil suit affidavit, citing a witness had information that the witness denied. He said Jossy had led ALE on a bunch of wild goose chases and that he was senile and a baffoon. Let me think, Anna, what else..........


ahh ok so he never mentioned the tape?


Joe mentioned the tape....

But then he went off saying something about sure...like the Dr Phil tapes were legit....don't quote me word for word....but I can assure you joe knows that jossy has the tape.  He just did not seem to give it much validity.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #553 12/3 - 12/4/2006
Post by: crazybabyborg on December 03, 2006, 10:40:13 PM
Quote from: "Jacqueline"
Joe implied that jossy was a bafoon because he does not present true facts...he spins things and sent the aruba police on more wild goosechases and that he hindered the investigation.

I did not hear him call him senile, but I could have missed it with my typing....


His rant was elevated when he said it, but he did say it.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #553 12/3 - 12/4/2006
Post by: cubbeegirl on December 03, 2006, 10:40:17 PM
Quote from: "Dana"
Quote from: "crazybabyborg"
Tacky said that Carlo and KJ were just in court dropping the charges against Joran and that Carlo did not meet with her in a secret meeting and never said he suspected Joran of anything. He said that Beth lied on the civil suit affidavit, citing a witness had information that the witness denied. He said Jossy had led ALE on a bunch of wild goose chases and that he was senile and a baffoon. Let me think, Anna, what else..........


ahh ok so he never mentioned the tape?



Gosh he was screeching on and on I am having a hard time remembering what all he did say, but I think maybe he said that if Jossy has the tape then why doesn't he turn it in?
Correct me if I have that wrong someone...


Title: Lively Case Discussion #553 12/3 - 12/4/2006
Post by: Anna on December 03, 2006, 10:40:34 PM
.
Yes, JoeyT was TRYING to make it sound as though he knew about the tape Jossy had but he didn't actually say he did, only that Jossy is a buffoon.  And then he went on to say that about Dompig being fired because he doesn't believe Joran was involved at all, etc.

He says all of it lies, unfounded and unsubstantiated, etc. about Carlos too.

Says he is still Joran's attorney.  Jacqueline did a transcript in real time that is very good on what Joey T actually said,  was hard to understand him he was so upset and whiney sounding.

.(http://i15.photobucket.com/albums/a360/AnnaBlueSkies/Greetings/Holidays%20and%20BD/thkerstmis910.gif)


Title: Lively Case Discussion #553 12/3 - 12/4/2006
Post by: LilPuma on December 03, 2006, 10:40:46 PM
Quote from: "robots"
save yourself JOE !!

go to church !!  pray for forgiveness

get away from the DARKSIDE  8)


He's repeating things said by the Darkside for over a year.  I'm not sure there's evidence of his claims.  Count I:  Jossy has zero credibility.  We can prove that false.  Count II:  Carlo didn't say that; De Vries is making it up. I'd guess that at the very least DeVries has evidence that KJ made this claim, true or not.  Count III:  Every one is lying but him and his client.  Well, that's an easy one to disprove.  

Yet Kimberly took his side in the final analysis.  :::sigh:::  Sounds like the Fox Girls have a thing for the greasy lug.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #553 12/3 - 12/4/2006
Post by: MisGivings on December 03, 2006, 10:41:04 PM
Quote from: "Lala'sMom"
Since I seem to be talking to myself...just want all our monkeys that could be affected by the weather in the Midwest and other places to know we are thinking about them...I was wondering about our Snoop Dog and the others that live in those states affected.  Anyone know?  Help me out here, if I have numbers for any of them I will call and check on them.  What about Misgivings?  Would she be affected?


************************************************************

Hi, dear, I am OK, just suffering through a nasty head cold. The furnace was out for the wind storm, but it is fixed now. We had terrible wind Friday. Half of the roof's shingles are scattered through my back yard.
My brother and his family flew back from Germany in it and had a 3 and one half hour delay in the Newark, NJ airport.
I had to take cone off my little Peanut's head or go search for her in another county. The wind was just awful.
Thanks for thinking of me, hun, I really do appreciate it...
Now who wants to adopt me for Christmas/\?????


Title: Lively Case Discussion #553 12/3 - 12/4/2006
Post by: Florida on December 03, 2006, 10:41:41 PM
On BFN..... MIP6 is Mark Purcell    
SandraK is SandraK

Who is REALITY?


Title: Lively Case Discussion #553 12/3 - 12/4/2006
Post by: igsigs on December 03, 2006, 10:41:51 PM
Dana...about the tape...

Jossy said he has a videoed interview with Dompig saying the J2K admitted doing this and that...

Joe T. responded by bashing Jossy and Dompig's credibility. Did not address the tape directly.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #553 12/3 - 12/4/2006
Post by: Jacqueline on December 03, 2006, 10:42:15 PM
I have to say that phone call was damn entertaining.

What a tool.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #553 12/3 - 12/4/2006
Post by: LilPuma on December 03, 2006, 10:44:07 PM
Quote from: "crazybabyborg"
Tacky went on to ridicule Jossy for saying he would present the prosecutor with the evidence before the trial. He said, yeah right, why not now?


Jossy answered that question - things in this case have a tendency to get lost or manipulated.   :wink:  If ever there was a capitalist buffoon, it's Joe and his Fox Girl Fan Club.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #553 12/3 - 12/4/2006
Post by: Anna on December 03, 2006, 10:44:24 PM
I defer to what other monkeys heard as I can't listen with my jaw on the floor, lol!  His tone was too distracting, I really don't know what the heck he said as I have never heard him like that and was too taken aback by his emotionality.

.

(http://i15.photobucket.com/albums/a360/AnnaBlueSkies/Greetings/Holidays%20and%20BD/thT2GoYorkieSantaHHolidays-vi.gif)


Title: Lively Case Discussion #553 12/3 - 12/4/2006
Post by: cubbeegirl on December 03, 2006, 10:45:43 PM
Quote from: "Anna"
I defer to what other monkeys heard as I can't listen with my jaw on the floor, lol!  His tone was too distracting, I really don't know what the heck he said as I have never heard him like that and was too taken aback by his emotionality.

.

(http://i15.photobucket.com/albums/a360/AnnaBlueSkies/Greetings/Holidays%20and%20BD/thT2GoYorkieSantaHHolidays-vi.gif)




Yes, he was VERY emotional to say the least....


Title: Lively Case Discussion #553 12/3 - 12/4/2006
Post by: Jacqueline on December 03, 2006, 10:46:07 PM
Quote from: "LilPuma"
Quote from: "crazybabyborg"
Tacky went on to ridicule Jossy for saying he would present the prosecutor with the evidence before the trial. He said, yeah right, why not now?


Jossy answered that question - things in this case have a tendency to get lost or manipulated.   :wink:  If ever there was a capitalist buffoon, it's Joe and his Fox Girl Fan Club.


Jossy also mentioned that he tapes converations, etc when he has reason to doubt and not trust the person...

I would like to see Jossy and Joe in the studio together...


Title: Lively Case Discussion #553 12/3 - 12/4/2006
Post by: Lala'sMom on December 03, 2006, 10:46:19 PM
Did someone say that Carlo and JK were in court getting the charges against Joran dropped?  Is that right?  Are they going to let the sporter go free...OOOOH!  I hope he knows how to look over his shoulder...forever!


Title: Lively Case Discussion #553 12/3 - 12/4/2006
Post by: klaasend on December 03, 2006, 10:47:12 PM
Wonder how much A.H.A.T.A is paying Joe?  :lol:

(http://i37.photobucket.com/albums/e82/klaasend2/diaperJOE.jpg)


Title: Lively Case Discussion #553 12/3 - 12/4/2006
Post by: cubbeegirl on December 03, 2006, 10:47:49 PM
Quote from: "klaasend"
Wonder how much A.H.A.T.A is paying Joe?  :lol:

(http://i37.photobucket.com/albums/e82/klaasend2/diaperJOE.jpg)




 :lol:  :lol:  :lol:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #553 12/3 - 12/4/2006
Post by: Dana on December 03, 2006, 10:48:00 PM
Quote from: "Jacqueline"
Quote from: "Dana"
Quote from: "crazybabyborg"
Tacky said that Carlo and KJ were just in court dropping the charges against Joran and that Carlo did not meet with her in a secret meeting and never said he suspected Joran of anything. He said that Beth lied on the civil suit affidavit, citing a witness had information that the witness denied. He said Jossy had led ALE on a bunch of wild goose chases and that he was senile and a baffoon. Let me think, Anna, what else..........


ahh ok so he never mentioned the tape?


Joe mentioned the tape....

But then he went off saying something about sure...like the Dr Phil tapes were legit....don't quote me word for word....but I can assure you joe knows that jossy has the tape.  He just did not seem to give it much validity.



well we will see now wont we.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #553 12/3 - 12/4/2006
Post by: Angiex911dsptchr on December 03, 2006, 10:48:07 PM
Quote from: "klaasend"
Wonder how much A.H.A.T.A is paying Joe?  :lol:

(http://i37.photobucket.com/albums/e82/klaasend2/diaperJOE.jpg)


  ROFLMAO!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!


Title: Lively Case Discussion #553 12/3 - 12/4/2006
Post by: LilPuma on December 03, 2006, 10:48:20 PM
Question for the Monkey Brain Trust:  

Is there a correlation between Joe Mammana's recent problems and the case against J2K heating up?  Think.  Ponder.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #553 12/3 - 12/4/2006
Post by: Jacqueline on December 03, 2006, 10:48:28 PM
Quote from: "Lala'sMom"
Did someone say that Carlo and JK were in court getting the charges against Joran dropped?  Is that right?  Are they going to let the sporter go free...OOOOH!  I hope he knows how to look over his shoulder...forever!


I think what he meant was, they were both in court together on Thursday, but not "together"  meaning they both were there.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #553 12/3 - 12/4/2006
Post by: klaasend on December 03, 2006, 10:48:38 PM
Quote from: "Florida"
On BFN..... MIP6 is Mark Purcell    
SandraK is SandraK

Who is REALITY?

If I answer that I'll be banned, lol  :lol:  :lol:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #553 12/3 - 12/4/2006
Post by: igsigs on December 03, 2006, 10:48:54 PM
Quote from: "Lala'sMom"
Did someone say that Carlo and JK were in court getting the charges against Joran dropped?  Is that right?  Are they going to let the sporter go free...OOOOH!  I hope he knows how to look over his shoulder...forever!

Taco was hyperventilating when he said that Lala's. I think Joran will remain a suspect.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #553 12/3 - 12/4/2006
Post by: memphis on December 03, 2006, 10:49:46 PM
Quote from: "Lala'sMom"
Did someone say that Carlo and JK were in court getting the charges against Joran dropped?  Is that right?  Are they going to let the sporter go free...OOOOH!  I hope he knows how to look over his shoulder...forever!


wonder if that slipped out in his hysteria?  :shock:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #553 12/3 - 12/4/2006
Post by: Jacqueline on December 03, 2006, 10:50:11 PM
Quote from: "LilPuma"
Question for the Monkey Brain Trust:  

Is there a correlation between Joe Mammana's recent problems and the case against J2K heating up?  Think.  Ponder.


I absolutely think they are targeting J Mama because of this.
Yes I do.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #553 12/3 - 12/4/2006
Post by: Dana on December 03, 2006, 10:50:34 PM
Quote from: "LilPuma"
Question for the Monkey Brain Trust:  

Is there a correlation between Joe Mammana's recent problems and the case against J2K heating up?  Think.  Ponder.


no its not related in my opinion


Title: Lively Case Discussion #553 12/3 - 12/4/2006
Post by: robots on December 03, 2006, 10:50:52 PM
Quote from: "klaasend"
Wonder how much A.H.A.T.A is paying Joe?  :lol:

(http://i37.photobucket.com/albums/e82/klaasend2/diaperJOE.jpg)


rofl


Title: Lively Case Discussion #553 12/3 - 12/4/2006
Post by: MisGivings on December 03, 2006, 10:50:59 PM
Quote from: "San"
Now that I am thinking about it more Antonio Carlo seems to think there is evidence that can be found.  He is giving her a hint that something can be found and she has to investigate it and she is just ignoring what he is saying.


Actually, I think he is saying just the opposite. He is telling Jansen that she will have to find evidence if she wants to convict his client. He knows who all was involved in covering up for Joran after he killed Natalee, and therefore knows they did a damn good job of making sure there wasn't any evidence.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #553 12/3 - 12/4/2006
Post by: Angiex911dsptchr on December 03, 2006, 10:50:59 PM
Quote from: "klaasend"
Quote from: "Florida"
On BFN..... MIP6 is Mark Purcell    
SandraK is SandraK

Who is REALITY?

If I answer that I'll be banned, lol  :lol:  :lol:


 :twisted:   ROFL !


Title: Lively Case Discussion #553 12/3 - 12/4/2006
Post by: Lala'sMom on December 03, 2006, 10:51:01 PM
Quote from: "klaasend"
Wonder how much A.H.A.T.A is paying Joe?  :lol:

(http://i37.photobucket.com/albums/e82/klaasend2/diaperJOE.jpg)


OMG!!    Now, I will have nightmares.  :roll:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #553 12/3 - 12/4/2006
Post by: LilPuma on December 03, 2006, 10:51:10 PM
Quote from: "Jacqueline"
Joe implied that jossy was a bafoon because he does not present true facts...he spins things and sent the aruba police on more wild goosechases and that he hindered the investigation.

I did not hear him call him senile, but I could have missed it with my typing....


Jossy hindered the investigation?  Is this a clear case of projection by a third party or what?  He's blaming others for what his clients have done.    :idea: Oh, that's what someone is paying him for  :!:  Do we know yet who is paying him?


Title: Lively Case Discussion #553 12/3 - 12/4/2006
Post by: Shizaru on December 03, 2006, 10:51:18 PM
Klaasend can you zoom in on the name on the new screenshots


Title: Lively Case Discussion #553 12/3 - 12/4/2006
Post by: Angiex911dsptchr on December 03, 2006, 10:52:40 PM
Passing Lalas MUFFS!!  :wink:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #553 12/3 - 12/4/2006
Post by: LilPuma on December 03, 2006, 10:53:46 PM
Quote from: "Anna"
I defer to what other monkeys heard as I can't listen with my jaw on the floor, lol!  His tone was too distracting, I really don't know what the heck he said as I have never heard him like that and was too taken aback by his emotionality.

.


Arlene went through the same phase, you may recall.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #553 12/3 - 12/4/2006
Post by: Anna on December 03, 2006, 10:54:00 PM
Quote from: "LilPuma"
Question for the Monkey Brain Trust:  

Is there a correlation between Joe Mammana's recent problems and the case against J2K heating up?  Think.  Ponder.



Remember Joe T had his detractors when he asked the City of Philadelphia I think it was to join the boycott?  And the detective who Paulus I think it was hired, Ruzzio of the dirty tricks if from there, isn't he?

Yeah, I wonder if he has stirred up a few enemies closer to home than he might have expected just from supporting this family.  Some may well have large financial interests in Aruba and be really mad at Joe for becoming involved.

Sure makes ya wonder!

(http://i15.photobucket.com/albums/a360/AnnaBlueSkies/Greetings/Holidays%20and%20BD/thAnimation22222.gif)


Title: Lively Case Discussion #553 12/3 - 12/4/2006
Post by: Lala'sMom on December 03, 2006, 10:54:17 PM
Hi Misgivings, I am glad you are ok.  Was worried about you and our other monkeys in this terribly cold weather.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #553 12/3 - 12/4/2006
Post by: crazybabyborg on December 03, 2006, 10:54:46 PM
Quote from: "Dana"
Quote from: "Jacqueline"
Quote from: "Dana"
Quote from: "crazybabyborg"
Tacky said that Carlo and KJ were just in court dropping the charges against Joran and that Carlo did not meet with her in a secret meeting and never said he suspected Joran of anything. He said that Beth lied on the civil suit affidavit, citing a witness had information that the witness denied. He said Jossy had led ALE on a bunch of wild goose chases and that he was senile and a baffoon. Let me think, Anna, what else..........


ahh ok so he never mentioned the tape?


Joe mentioned the tape....

But then he went off saying something about sure...like the Dr Phil tapes were legit....don't quote me word for word....but I can assure you joe knows that jossy has the tape.  He just did not seem to give it much validity.



well we will see now wont we.


OK, Dana.............we could use a little good news in this season of giving!  :wink:  :lol:

I must say, Beth is always a class act, and tonight she was especially so. Tacky's rant just elevated her.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #553 12/3 - 12/4/2006
Post by: Lala'sMom on December 03, 2006, 10:54:51 PM
Quote from: "Angiex911dsptchr"
Passing Lalas MUFFS!!  :wink:


I think I need two pair tonight. LOL


Title: Lively Case Discussion #553 12/3 - 12/4/2006
Post by: Dana on December 03, 2006, 10:55:35 PM
Quote from: "Anna"
Quote from: "LilPuma"
Question for the Monkey Brain Trust:  

Is there a correlation between Joe Mammana's recent problems and the case against J2K heating up?  Think.  Ponder.



Remember Joe T had his detractors when he asked the City of Philadelphia I think it was to join the boycott?  And the detective who Paulus I think it was hired, Ruzzio of the dirty tricks if from there, isn't he?

Yeah, I wonder if he has stirred up a few enemies closer to home than he might have expected just from supporting this family.  Some may well have large financial interests in Aruba and be really mad at Joe for becoming involved.

Sure makes ya wonder!

(http://i15.photobucket.com/albums/a360/AnnaBlueSkies/Greetings/Holidays%20and%20BD/thAnimation22222.gif)


no, my bet is the central ohio crime stoppers problem is the fuel for this fire at Joe M.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #553 12/3 - 12/4/2006
Post by: Angiex911dsptchr on December 03, 2006, 10:55:54 PM
Quote from: "Lala'sMom"
Quote from: "Angiex911dsptchr"
Passing Lalas MUFFS!!  :wink:


I think I need two pair tonight. LOL


  ROFL~!!  :wink:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #553 12/3 - 12/4/2006
Post by: Lala'sMom on December 03, 2006, 10:57:24 PM
If KJ doesn't want to introduce any new evidence, then how could Jossy possibly do it?  He isn't or won't be involved in the case should it ever go to trial.  If they let the perps go, do we then get to hear that tape?  Do we then get to hear everything Jossy knows?


Title: Lively Case Discussion #553 12/3 - 12/4/2006
Post by: Katysmom on December 03, 2006, 10:58:05 PM
Quote from: "robots"
Quote from: "klaasend"
Wonder how much A.H.A.T.A is paying Joe?  :lol:

(http://i37.photobucket.com/albums/e82/klaasend2/diaperJOE.jpg)


rofl


Sure hope that bonnet is soaking up some of the grease in his hair!  This is definately a wall-hanger!!


Title: Lively Case Discussion #553 12/3 - 12/4/2006
Post by: Jacqueline on December 03, 2006, 10:58:20 PM
(http://i23.photobucket.com/albums/b387/jacqueline111/Man-Crying_200.jpg)

Lies, I tell you...they're all lying.........


Title: Lively Case Discussion #553 12/3 - 12/4/2006
Post by: LilPuma on December 03, 2006, 10:58:30 PM
Quote from: "Katysmom"
Quote from: "cubbeegirl"
Well... Joe Taco certainly showed his azz with that phone call.....


He just proved to the world what a jerk he is.  No way would I want this man representing me in a court of law!!!


I remember his comments on the Christy Brinkley divorce - he is representing the 19 year old woman who was having an affair with Christy's husband - His poor young innocent client is being dragged into this unjustly.  Just like Joran.  The attitude was totally the same.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #553 12/3 - 12/4/2006
Post by: justinsmama on December 03, 2006, 10:58:36 PM
Too bad there was no vid of Taco. I'd bet the farm that he was spewing spittle as he lost it.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #553 12/3 - 12/4/2006
Post by: crazybabyborg on December 03, 2006, 10:58:37 PM
I want Beth to file an obstruction of justice suit. It may not bring the perps down but they will wear the banner of OJ more snugly as a result!


Title: Lively Case Discussion #553 12/3 - 12/4/2006
Post by: Dana on December 03, 2006, 10:59:37 PM
Quote from: "crazybabyborg"
I want Beth to file an obstruction of justice suit. It may not bring the perps down but they will wear the banner of OJ more snugly as a result!


where is john q kelley during all of this ?


Title: Lively Case Discussion #553 12/3 - 12/4/2006
Post by: Anna on December 03, 2006, 11:00:09 PM
.
Tyler knows much more about the detective Paulus hired Ruzzio.  He used to work for Posner I believe but she knows more details on that than I do.  He is famous for dirty tricks or used to be in his heyday.

But if there is a way to get Joe M in trouble with the feds, I would certainly think he is capable or some of his cohorts.  All it takes are a few anonymous tips I would think.  At least to start them looking and if they started back when Joe M was asking the city to boycott, about now would have given them plenty of time.

Was someone on city counsel who opposed Mammana getting involved and said it was shameful to boycott.

Some of you Pennsylvania monkeys should remember all that.

(http://i15.photobucket.com/albums/a360/AnnaBlueSkies/Greetings/Holidays%20and%20BD/thimg56.gif)


Title: Lively Case Discussion #553 12/3 - 12/4/2006
Post by: crazybabyborg on December 03, 2006, 11:00:18 PM
Quote from: "Lala'sMom"
If KJ doesn't want to introduce any new evidence, then how could Jossy possibly do it?  He isn't or won't be involved in the case should it ever go to trial.  If they let the perps go, do we then get to hear that tape?  Do we then get to hear everything Jossy knows?


I want her to introduce DeVries as a witness and then sit down and shut up.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #553 12/3 - 12/4/2006
Post by: Jacqueline on December 03, 2006, 11:00:54 PM
Quote from: "Dana"
Quote from: "crazybabyborg"
I want Beth to file an obstruction of justice suit. It may not bring the perps down but they will wear the banner of OJ more snugly as a result!


where is john q kelley during all of this ?


Yes, that is a good question.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #553 12/3 - 12/4/2006
Post by: klaasend on December 03, 2006, 11:00:56 PM
Quote from: "Shizaru"
Klaasend can you zoom in on the name on the new screenshots


I only did the one that is the clearest.  Still can't read the name but the initials can almost be read.

(http://i37.photobucket.com/albums/e82/klaasend2/cpv6.jpg)


Title: Lively Case Discussion #553 12/3 - 12/4/2006
Post by: Angiex911dsptchr on December 03, 2006, 11:01:32 PM
Quote from: "Dana"
Quote from: "crazybabyborg"
I want Beth to file an obstruction of justice suit. It may not bring the perps down but they will wear the banner of OJ more snugly as a result!


where is john q kelley during all of this ?


 Good question!!!


Title: Lively Case Discussion #553 12/3 - 12/4/2006
Post by: LilPuma on December 03, 2006, 11:01:44 PM
Quote from: "crazybabyborg"
I want Beth to file an obstruction of justice suit. It may not bring the perps down but they will wear the banner of OJ more snugly as a result!


Interesting that Ruben, Arlene and Stephen all liked the OJ analogy.  Sounds as though they believe Joran is guilty but he's going to walk.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #553 12/3 - 12/4/2006
Post by: Dana on December 03, 2006, 11:01:54 PM
Quote from: "Jacqueline"
Quote from: "Dana"
Quote from: "crazybabyborg"
I want Beth to file an obstruction of justice suit. It may not bring the perps down but they will wear the banner of OJ more snugly as a result!


where is john q kelley during all of this ?


Yes, that is a good question.


these dopey fox news shows bring on beth to fend for herself against these high priced ny lawyers, john q should be there with her.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #553 12/3 - 12/4/2006
Post by: crazybabyborg on December 03, 2006, 11:02:18 PM
Quote from: "Dana"
Quote from: "crazybabyborg"
I want Beth to file an obstruction of justice suit. It may not bring the perps down but they will wear the banner of OJ more snugly as a result!


where is john q kelley during all of this ?


MOST excellent question!

Oh, I could be an eternal optimist and remind everyone that he was deathly quiet before slapping Joran with a summons, so maybe something's in the works, but somebody would call me Pollyanna.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #553 12/3 - 12/4/2006
Post by: Katysmom on December 03, 2006, 11:03:25 PM
Quote from: "Dana"
Quote from: "Jacqueline"
Quote from: "Dana"
Quote from: "crazybabyborg"
I want Beth to file an obstruction of justice suit. It may not bring the perps down but they will wear the banner of OJ more snugly as a result!


where is john q kelley during all of this ?


Yes, that is a good question.


these dopey fox news shows bring on beth to fend for herself against these high priced ny lawyers, john q should be there with her.


I can see JohnQ now, sitting there with a smile and shaking his head in disbelief.  JQ has a lot more class than Greasy Taco Joe


Title: Lively Case Discussion #553 12/3 - 12/4/2006
Post by: klaasend on December 03, 2006, 11:03:42 PM
Quote from: "Dana"
Quote from: "crazybabyborg"
I want Beth to file an obstruction of justice suit. It may not bring the perps down but they will wear the banner of OJ more snugly as a result!


where is john q kelley during all of this ?

Good question.  What I'm wondering is why Joe T is involved at all.  He was hired to represent the Sloots for the civil case, he has nothing to do with the criminal case as he has no authority to represent them in an Aruban court.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #553 12/3 - 12/4/2006
Post by: justinsmama on December 03, 2006, 11:04:29 PM
Quote from: "klaasend"
Quote from: "Dana"
Quote from: "crazybabyborg"
I want Beth to file an obstruction of justice suit. It may not bring the perps down but they will wear the banner of OJ more snugly as a result!


where is john q kelley during all of this ?

Good question.  What I'm wondering is why Joe T is involved at all.  He was hired to represent the Sloots for the civil case, he has nothing to do with the criminal case as he has no authority to represent them in an Aruban court.


He's a PR guy for them, that's all. And not a good one at all.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #553 12/3 - 12/4/2006
Post by: robots on December 03, 2006, 11:04:31 PM
Quote from: "klaasend"
Quote from: "Dana"
Quote from: "crazybabyborg"
I want Beth to file an obstruction of justice suit. It may not bring the perps down but they will wear the banner of OJ more snugly as a result!


where is john q kelley during all of this ?

Good question.  What I'm wondering is why Joe T is involved at all.  He was hired to represent the Sloots for the civil case, he has nothing to do with the criminal case as he has no authority to represent them in an Aruban court.


maybe he and JORAN are having a "relationship" ?


 :?  :?  :?  :?




 :twisted:  :twisted:  :twisted:  :twisted:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #553 12/3 - 12/4/2006
Post by: Katysmom on December 03, 2006, 11:04:34 PM
Quote from: "klaasend"
Quote from: "Dana"
Quote from: "crazybabyborg"
I want Beth to file an obstruction of justice suit. It may not bring the perps down but they will wear the banner of OJ more snugly as a result!


where is john q kelley during all of this ?

Good question.  What I'm wondering is why Joe T is involved at all.  He was hired to represent the Sloots for the civil case, he has nothing to do with the criminal case as he has no authority to represent them in an Aruban court.


Because he THINKS he's important???


Title: Lively Case Discussion #553 12/3 - 12/4/2006
Post by: LilPuma on December 03, 2006, 11:06:21 PM
Quote from: "Dana"
Jossy is a buffoon because he is saying he has a tape?


Don't be silly, Dana!  Jossy is a buffoon because he wants this case solved and Joe knows his client will be convicted if that happens.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #553 12/3 - 12/4/2006
Post by: Jacqueline on December 03, 2006, 11:06:28 PM
I find it very encouraging that Joey blew a gasket over this...

Such a strong reaction from just nonsense?


Eh Eh.....


Title: Lively Case Discussion #553 12/3 - 12/4/2006
Post by: Anna on December 03, 2006, 11:06:53 PM
Quote from: "Dana"
[no, my bet is the central ohio crime stoppers problem is the fuel for this fire at Joe M.


You may be right.  But there would seem to have to be some reason they would just suddenly go after Joe M on all fronts, etc.  Not likely just out of the blue, etc.  Guess if he threatened to burn down his wife's house, that didn't help his case any, either.  :roll:

I just hope that he is vindicated on all charges.  Three million in taxes is a huge amount.  I wonder if they mean taxes on three million instead of that amount as the tax because that would be some income!

/(http://i15.photobucket.com/albums/a360/AnnaBlueSkies/Greetings/Holidays%20and%20BD/thsanta_c_with_puppies__so_cute.jpg)


Title: Lively Case Discussion #553 12/3 - 12/4/2006
Post by: Tylergal on December 03, 2006, 11:08:55 PM
Quote from: "justinsmama"
Quote from: "Kat_Gram"
Quote from: "Lala'sMom"
Nonesy
Email coming your way...don't get lost in all that dough...I don't have a dough extractor handy.   :lol:

A dough extractor ? Could I use that on my bum ?


Seeing as how I just spent the last hour unclogging the toilet (no, not Aruba), I figure I am now an expert at suctioning out items. I'll be on hand to extricate nonesy, if need be. Any other takers?


Get yourself a Toto toilet. :lol:  :lol:  :lol:  Less clogs!


Title: Lively Case Discussion #553 12/3 - 12/4/2006
Post by: Dana on December 03, 2006, 11:09:30 PM
Quote from: "Anna"
Quote from: "Dana"
[no, my bet is the central ohio crime stoppers problem is the fuel for this fire at Joe M.


You may be right.  But there would seem to have to be some reason they would just suddenly go after Joe M on all fronts, etc.  Not likely just out of the blue, etc.  Guess if he threatened to burn down his wife's house, that didn't help his case any, either.  :roll:

I just hope that he is vindicated on all charges.  Three million in taxes is a huge amount.  I wonder if they mean taxes on three million instead of that amount as the tax because that would be some income!

/(http://i15.photobucket.com/albums/a360/AnnaBlueSkies/Greetings/Holidays%20and%20BD/thsanta_c_with_puppies__so_cute.jpg)


irs could go after many corperations im sure, my concern is the gun charge, if true Joe M should have known better.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #553 12/3 - 12/4/2006
Post by: Angiex911dsptchr on December 03, 2006, 11:09:37 PM
Quote from: "Jacqueline"
I find it very encouraging that Joey blew a gasket over this...

Such a strong reaction from just nonsense?


Eh Eh.....

 

I agree Jackie! He could have just watched it.. laughed to himself in the comfort of his own home.. But freaking out on air the way he did  ROFL
Hes shakin in his shoes. Id bet on it!!


Title: Lively Case Discussion #553 12/3 - 12/4/2006
Post by: Tylergal on December 03, 2006, 11:10:10 PM
Quote from: "2NJSons_Mom"
Quote from: "Florida"
Paulus van der Sloot's June 23 statement:

To your question if I tell you all the things I did on that
Monday the 30th of May 2005, I can state the following. I went to work.
The exact time I cannot remember but I think it was approximately
08.00 hours. I can also remember that around 10.00 hours I went
to the C.M.B. bank. There were long cues at the bank so I left without
having made any transaction and went back to work.

I left my workplace at approximately 15.00 hours. I arrived at the bank at approximately 15.30. I had gone to the C.M.B. bank that is situated in Noord.

   To your question whether I went to the bank without stopping
or going anywhere else, I can state the following. I at least cannot
 remember having been anywhere else. I think I went directly to the bank.
At the bank I talked to Ruth DIJKHOFF. At the bank I deposited the
money that Joran said that he had won in the “Free Tournament in
the Holiday Inn” on the 29th of May 2005. It was approximately
500 Aruban guilders. Joran had given me 100 guilders because he
had taken over my place in the tournament.

Why is Paulus so insistent on depositing this money?


This is the grey area...if it was a free tournament, which could be no $ exchanged, but I may be inexperienced in gambling sessions.  If Joran has stated that he played until he lost and then went to the BlackJack tables, then, where did this 100 florins come from?  Maybe I am just not with the program.


The lovely Arleen has told us repeatedly that we do not understand their system. :lol:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #553 12/3 - 12/4/2006
Post by: Jacqueline on December 03, 2006, 11:10:30 PM
Feds: Avenger paid no taxes on $3.2MEVASION SAID TO DATE BACK TO 2000; MAMMANA ALSO HIT WITH GUN CHARGES
By BOB WARNER
warnerb@phillynews.com 215-854-5885
JOE MAMMANA, the flashy businessman who made headlines offering hefty rewards in high-profile crime cases, has pocketed at least $3.2 million from various business ventures over the past six years, without paying federal taxes since 2000, federal prosecutors charged yesterday.


^ For Anna... :lol:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #553 12/3 - 12/4/2006
Post by: Lala'sMom on December 03, 2006, 11:13:14 PM
Jossy is way smarter than the rest.  He knows what he is doing.  To quote Robots...."BET THE FARM"


Title: Lively Case Discussion #553 12/3 - 12/4/2006
Post by: LilPuma on December 03, 2006, 11:13:34 PM
Quote from: "Dana"
irs could go after many corperations im sure, my concern is the gun charge, if true Joe M should have known better.


Depends on how the corporations are set up whether they can go after corporate money for his personal debts.  It's possible they can't.  As for the gun, how did they find the gun?  I didn't hear that part.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #553 12/3 - 12/4/2006
Post by: memphis on December 03, 2006, 11:14:30 PM
Quote from: "Anna"
.
Tyler knows much more about the detective Paulus hired Ruzzio.  He used to work for Posner I believe but she knows more details on that than I do.  He is famous for dirty tricks or used to be in his heyday.   :shock:

But if there is a way to get Joe M in trouble with the feds, I would certainly think he is capable or some of his cohorts.  All it takes are a few anonymous tips I would think.  At least to start them looking and if they started back when Joe M was asking the city to boycott, about now would have given them plenty of time.

Was someone on city counsel who opposed Mammana getting involved and said it was shameful to boycott.

Some of you Pennsylvania monkeys should remember all that.

(http://i15.photobucket.com/albums/a360/AnnaBlueSkies/Greetings/Holidays%20and%20BD/thimg56.gif)


Title: Lively Case Discussion #553 12/3 - 12/4/2006
Post by: robots on December 03, 2006, 11:14:37 PM
Quote from: "Lala'sMom"
Jossy is way smarter than the rest.  He knows what he is doing.  To quote Robots...."BET THE FARM"



 :twisted:  8)
yep


Title: Lively Case Discussion #553 12/3 - 12/4/2006
Post by: Jacqueline on December 03, 2006, 11:15:07 PM
They had a search warrant for his house (why, I don't know) but in searching they found a gun on his nightstand.

If he is being investigated for tax too, maybe they were there in conjunction with that...


Title: Lively Case Discussion #553 12/3 - 12/4/2006
Post by: Anna on December 03, 2006, 11:15:12 PM
Quote from: "robots"
[
maybe he and JORAN are having a "relationship" ?


 :?  :?  :?  :?




 :twisted:  :twisted:  :twisted:  :twisted:



Jossy said the relationship between Joran and Guido was more than just friendship and made it perfectly clear what he meant, too.  Certainly not just best buds forever kind of thingy.

And remember Joran saying Deepak had never had a girlfriend.  Looks like some pretty maladjusted kids if one considers all that sort of thing maladjustment.  At the least, conflicted kids.  Hows all that porn working out for you Sloots?  Still think it a good and enlightened thing to expose to young kids?


(http://i15.photobucket.com/albums/a360/AnnaBlueSkies/Greetings/Holidays%20and%20BD/thkbg.jpg)


Title: Lively Case Discussion #553 12/3 - 12/4/2006
Post by: 2NJSons_Mom on December 03, 2006, 11:15:21 PM
Quote from: "LilPuma"
Quote from: "Dana"
irs could go after many corperations im sure, my concern is the gun charge, if true Joe M should have known better.


Depends on how the corporations are set up whether they can go after corporate money for his personal debts.  It's possible they can't.  As for the gun, how did they find the gun?  I didn't hear that part.


Search of his home...warrant, I believe.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #553 12/3 - 12/4/2006
Post by: Dana on December 03, 2006, 11:15:49 PM
Quote from: "LilPuma"
Quote from: "Dana"
irs could go after many corperations im sure, my concern is the gun charge, if true Joe M should have known better.


Depends on how the corporations are set up whether they can go after corporate money for his personal debts.  It's possible they can't.  As for the gun, how did they find the gun?  I didn't hear that part.


his lawyer who was on my show friday said the gun was in the night stand in the bedroom, apparently registered to Joe's dad. But regardless X cons can be nowhere near any guns.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #553 12/3 - 12/4/2006
Post by: LilPuma on December 03, 2006, 11:17:38 PM
Quote from: "2NJSons_Mom"
Quote from: "LilPuma"
Quote from: "Dana"
irs could go after many corperations im sure, my concern is the gun charge, if true Joe M should have known better.


Depends on how the corporations are set up whether they can go after corporate money for his personal debts.  It's possible they can't.  As for the gun, how did they find the gun?  I didn't hear that part.


Search of his home...warrant, I believe.


They were searching his home for tax records?


Title: Lively Case Discussion #553 12/3 - 12/4/2006
Post by: igsigs on December 03, 2006, 11:17:40 PM
Quote from: "Anna"

Remember Joe T had his detractors when he asked the City of Philadelphia I think it was to join the boycott?  And the detective who Paulus I think it was hired, Ruzzio of the dirty tricks if from there, isn't he?

Les Levine = Joe T. dirty trickster

Rizzo = Philly politician with Aruban investments.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #553 12/3 - 12/4/2006
Post by: 2NJSons_Mom on December 03, 2006, 11:17:46 PM
Quote from: "Jacqueline"
They had a search warrant for his house (why, I don't know) but in searching they found a gun on his nightstand.

If he is being investigated for tax too, maybe they were there in conjunction with that...


Dana may know better, but this is what I was thinking...something lead them to his home...not sure if $/tax was first or if gun possession was...seems likely that the tax thing lead to the the home...jmo.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #553 12/3 - 12/4/2006
Post by: robots on December 03, 2006, 11:18:13 PM
Quote from: "Anna"
Quote from: "robots"
[
maybe he and JORAN are having a "relationship" ?


 :?  :?  :?  :?




 :twisted:  :twisted:  :twisted:  :twisted:



Jossy said the relationship between Joran and Guido was more than just friendship and made it perfectly clear what he meant, too.  Certainly not just best buds forever kind of thingy.

And remember Joran saying Deepak had never had a girlfriend.  Looks like some pretty maladjusted kids if one considers all that sort of thing maladjustment.  At the least, conflicted kids.  Hows all that porn working out for you Sloots?  Still think it a good and enlightened thing to expose to young kids?


(http://i15.photobucket.com/albums/a360/AnnaBlueSkies/Greetings/Holidays%20and%20BD/thkbg.jpg)



sickies


Title: Lively Case Discussion #553 12/3 - 12/4/2006
Post by: memphis on December 03, 2006, 11:18:24 PM
Quote from: "klaasend"
Quote from: "Dana"
Quote from: "crazybabyborg"
I want Beth to file an obstruction of justice suit. It may not bring the perps down but they will wear the banner of OJ more snugly as a result!


where is john q kelley during all of this ?

Good question.  What I'm wondering is why Joe T is involved at all.  He was hired to represent the Sloots for the civil case, he has nothing to do with the criminal case as he has no authority to represent them in an Aruban court.


Yep, but most viewers will never ask or know that.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #553 12/3 - 12/4/2006
Post by: Jacqueline on December 03, 2006, 11:20:36 PM
I think here lies the answer:

Feds: Pa. philanthropist skipped taxes

THE ASSOCIATED PRESS

PHILADELPHIA -- Federal prosecutors contend a businessman known for pledging money to help track down criminals has pocketed $3.2 million of income over the past several years while not paying federal taxes since 2000.

Court papers allege Joe Mammana diverted millions from his Yardley egg farm into his personal checking account and four other business accounts to avoid income taxes.

Mammana has been "lining his pockets and accumulating luxury cars and a luxury house with the proceeds of his business, all while refusing to report this illicit income to the IRS," the U.S. Attorney's Office said in court papers Friday.

The court filing requested Mammana be kept in custody while awaiting trial on recent gun charges. U.S. Magistrate L. Felipe Restrepo granted the request, denying bail because he said Mammana was a flight risk.

Mammana was arrested on Thursday, the day after authorities found a loaded handgun in his home during a search for evidence of possible mail and wire fraud, according to an arrest warrant.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #553 12/3 - 12/4/2006
Post by: Anna on December 03, 2006, 11:21:47 PM
Quote from: "Dana"
[irs could go after many corperations im sure, my concern is the gun charge, if true Joe M should have known better.


G. Gordon Liddy says he can't have a gun because of being a convicted felon but that Mrs. Liddy has quite an extensive collection.  I hope Joe's father lives under the same roof.  Depending on local gun laws, that might be his only way to beat that one.

You are right, they will likely make him pay the taxes but he might avoid jail on that but not the gun.  Was registered to his father.

.(http://i15.photobucket.com/albums/a360/AnnaBlueSkies/Greetings/Holidays%20and%20BD/th2593_animado-1.gif)


Title: Lively Case Discussion #553 12/3 - 12/4/2006
Post by: memphis on December 03, 2006, 11:22:01 PM
Quote from: "Jacqueline"
I find it very encouraging that Joey blew a gasket over this...

Such a strong reaction from just nonsense?


Eh Eh.....


(http://bestsmileys.com/lol/4.gif)


Title: Lively Case Discussion #553 12/3 - 12/4/2006
Post by: crazybabyborg on December 03, 2006, 11:23:10 PM
(http://i25.photobucket.com/albums/c100/crazybabyborgs/paper.jpg)

I don't even know what it is I'm trying to see, but is this any better?


Title: Lively Case Discussion #553 12/3 - 12/4/2006
Post by: Jacqueline on December 03, 2006, 11:23:19 PM
Quote from: "Anna"
Quote from: "Dana"
[irs could go after many corperations im sure, my concern is the gun charge, if true Joe M should have known better.


G. Gordon Liddy says he can't have a gun because of being a convicted felon but that Mrs. Liddy has quite an extensive collection.  I hope Joe's father lives under the same roof.  Depending on local gun laws, that might be his only way to beat that one.

You are right, they will likely make him pay the taxes but he might avoid jail on that but not the gun.  Was registered to his father.

.(http://i15.photobucket.com/albums/a360/AnnaBlueSkies/Greetings/Holidays%20and%20BD/th2593_animado-1.gif)


Mandatory 60 month sentence on the gun charge. No plea bargaining. the loaded gun was registered back in 1979 under his dads name. I am not even sure if his dad is still even alive.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #553 12/3 - 12/4/2006
Post by: Jacqueline on December 03, 2006, 11:24:06 PM
Quote from: "memphis"
Quote from: "Jacqueline"
I find it very encouraging that Joey blew a gasket over this...

Such a strong reaction from just nonsense?


Eh Eh.....


(http://bestsmileys.com/lol/4.gif)


LOL :wink:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #553 12/3 - 12/4/2006
Post by: klaasend on December 03, 2006, 11:24:11 PM
Anna and Msmarple - I'll add the the Crime thread:

Posted today (12/3/2006) by Grande at T4N:


Grande wrote:
I don't know if this has been published yet or not, but I am told there was a 16 year old boy was killed last night outside of Carlos & Charlies amounting to the 2nd murder in 10 days.

Here is what I was told;

"Last night there was another killing infront of C&C. A 16 year old boy was killed. From what I heard, there was a fight outside of C&C and the kid was not even involved in the fight. He was at the wrong place at the wrong time. There was no shooting. So, I guess, he was hit and punched and he died. C&C gets very very very busy on weekends. So, a lot of people dont bother going in. They just stand outside the bar, hangout, drink and do drugs and then start fights....Well, that's exactly what happened last night and a young boy lost his life. Well, this is the 2nd murder in 10 days on the one happy island..."


and a follow-up:

Here are a couple other details I have heard...

The alleged suspect was recently released from jail

Was an employee of Tony Romas as of yesterday

Turned himself in today and has apparently taken his own life.

I have no idea how this will be reported and cannot confirm the validity at this point. I am fairly certain on all three accounts. Sorry to be the bearer of bad news regardless of the origin.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #553 12/3 - 12/4/2006
Post by: Katysmom on December 03, 2006, 11:24:21 PM
Quote from: "Anna"
Quote from: "Dana"
[irs could go after many corperations im sure, my concern is the gun charge, if true Joe M should have known better.


G. Gordon Liddy says he can't have a gun because of being a convicted felon but that Mrs. Liddy has quite an extensive collection.  I hope Joe's father lives under the same roof.  Depending on local gun laws, that might be his only way to beat that one.

You are right, they will likely make him pay the taxes but he might avoid jail on that but not the gun.  Was registered to his father.

.(http://i15.photobucket.com/albums/a360/AnnaBlueSkies/Greetings/Holidays%20and%20BD/th2593_animado-1.gif)



I think his father is deceased


Title: Lively Case Discussion #553 12/3 - 12/4/2006
Post by: Dana on December 03, 2006, 11:24:54 PM
Quote from: "Jacqueline"
Quote from: "Anna"
Quote from: "Dana"
[irs could go after many corperations im sure, my concern is the gun charge, if true Joe M should have known better.


G. Gordon Liddy says he can't have a gun because of being a convicted felon but that Mrs. Liddy has quite an extensive collection.  I hope Joe's father lives under the same roof.  Depending on local gun laws, that might be his only way to beat that one.

You are right, they will likely make him pay the taxes but he might avoid jail on that but not the gun.  Was registered to his father.

.(http://i15.photobucket.com/albums/a360/AnnaBlueSkies/Greetings/Holidays%20and%20BD/th2593_animado-1.gif)


Mandatory 60 month sentence on the gun charge. No plea bargaining. the loaded gun was registered back in 1979 under his dads name. I am not even sure if his dad is still even alive.


yup unless he can beat the charge he is going to do some jail time :-(


Title: Lively Case Discussion #553 12/3 - 12/4/2006
Post by: Tylergal on December 03, 2006, 11:25:03 PM
Quote from: "Anna"
Probably Bouti's real name.  I wonder if anyone told deVries that Bouti lives in the bushes and sits on a lawn chair there spying on the HI guests like a pervert all the time??  DeVries would have no way of knowing this person has fried their brain so totally already much like Joran is on the way to doing himself.


If it is Bouti, someone should tell devries and also that it is Dompig's brotherinlaw who will basically say anything like Joey T for a fix the way JoeT will for a $.

.(http://i15.photobucket.com/albums/a360/AnnaBlueSkies/Greetings/Holidays%20and%20BD/thk035.gif)(http://i15.photobucket.com/albums/a360/AnnaBlueSkies/Greetings/Holidays%20and%20BD/thk035.gif)(http://i15.photobucket.com/albums/a360/AnnaBlueSkies/Greetings/Holidays%20and%20BD/thk035.gif)(http://i15.photobucket.com/albums/a360/AnnaBlueSkies/Greetings/Holidays%20and%20BD/thk035.gif)(http://i15.photobucket.com/albums/a360/AnnaBlueSkies/Greetings/Holidays%20and%20BD/thk035.gif)

.


It makes you wonder how that lounge-looking lizard, Tacopino can sleep at night, knowing bad things happen to good people but hell is being heated up for slugs like himself and the VDS family and it never cools down, just gets hotter and hotter.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #553 12/3 - 12/4/2006
Post by: Anna on December 03, 2006, 11:25:40 PM
Thank you Jacquie!

Mail and wire fraud.  Those postal inspectors strike again.  Wish they would go after Paulus for writing that bogus letter he claimed was from Natalee.

So it is tax on that amount and not that amount in taxes.  Well, obviously he had a lot of expenses, lol!  

And he is physically in the slammer even as we speak.   :evil: No bail seems rather harsh considering his roots in the community and his egg business and all that.



(http://i15.photobucket.com/albums/a360/AnnaBlueSkies/Greetings/Holidays%20and%20BD/thchristmas55.gif)


Title: Lively Case Discussion #553 12/3 - 12/4/2006
Post by: crazybabyborg on December 03, 2006, 11:25:43 PM
I was typing rather than listening closely, but wasn't there some follow up discussion about a felon having a gun, up until a few years ago, wasn't illegal?


Title: Lively Case Discussion #553 12/3 - 12/4/2006
Post by: Jacqueline on December 03, 2006, 11:27:02 PM
Quote from: "Tylergal"
Quote from: "Anna"
Probably Bouti's real name.  I wonder if anyone told deVries that Bouti lives in the bushes and sits on a lawn chair there spying on the HI guests like a pervert all the time??  DeVries would have no way of knowing this person has fried their brain so totally already much like Joran is on the way to doing himself.


If it is Bouti, someone should tell devries and also that it is Dompig's brotherinlaw who will basically say anything like Joey T for a fix the way JoeT will for a $.

.(http://i15.photobucket.com/albums/a360/AnnaBlueSkies/Greetings/Holidays%20and%20BD/thk035.gif)(http://i15.photobucket.com/albums/a360/AnnaBlueSkies/Greetings/Holidays%20and%20BD/thk035.gif)(http://i15.photobucket.com/albums/a360/AnnaBlueSkies/Greetings/Holidays%20and%20BD/thk035.gif)(http://i15.photobucket.com/albums/a360/AnnaBlueSkies/Greetings/Holidays%20and%20BD/thk035.gif)(http://i15.photobucket.com/albums/a360/AnnaBlueSkies/Greetings/Holidays%20and%20BD/thk035.gif)

.


It makes you wonder how that lounge-looking lizard, Tacopino can sleep at night, knowing bad things happen to good people but hell is being heated up for slugs like himself and the VDS family and it never cools down, just gets hotter and hotter.


Insomnia only hits people who have a conscience!
He prolly sleeps like a baby... :wink:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #553 12/3 - 12/4/2006
Post by: Katysmom on December 03, 2006, 11:27:33 PM
Quote from: "klaasend"
Anna and Msmarple - I'll add the the Crime thread:

Posted today (12/3/2006) by Grande at T4N:


Grande wrote:
I don't know if this has been published yet or not, but I am told there was a 16 year old boy was killed last night outside of Carlos & Charlies amounting to the 2nd murder in 10 days.

Here is what I was told;

"Last night there was another killing infront of C&C. A 16 year old boy was killed. From what I heard, there was a fight outside of C&C and the kid was not even involved in the fight. He was at the wrong place at the wrong time. There was no shooting. So, I guess, he was hit and punched and he died. C&C gets very very very busy on weekends. So, a lot of people dont bother going in. They just stand outside the bar, hangout, drink and do drugs and then start fights....Well, that's exactly what happened last night and a young boy lost his life. Well, this is the 2nd murder in 10 days on the one happy island..."


and a follow-up:

Here are a couple other details I have heard...

The alleged suspect was recently released from jail

Was an employee of Tony Romas as of yesterday

Turned himself in today and has apparently taken his own life.

I have no idea how this will be reported and cannot confirm the validity at this point. I am fairly certain on all three accounts. Sorry to be the bearer of bad news regardless of the origin.


Suicide is a lot cheaper for Aruba than a trial.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #553 12/3 - 12/4/2006
Post by: Jacqueline on December 03, 2006, 11:28:19 PM
Quote from: "Anna"
Thank you Jacquie!

Mail and wire fraud.  Those postal inspectors strike again.  Wish they would go after Paulus for writing that bogus letter he claimed was from Natalee.

So it is tax on that amount and not that amount in taxes.  Well, obviously he had a lot of expenses, lol!  

And he is physically in the slammer even as we speak.   :evil: No bail seems rather harsh considering his roots in the community and his egg business and all that.


They are keeping him in cause he is considered a flight risk....


(http://i15.photobucket.com/albums/a360/AnnaBlueSkies/Greetings/Holidays%20and%20BD/thchristmas55.gif)


Title: Lively Case Discussion #553 12/3 - 12/4/2006
Post by: Carnut on December 03, 2006, 11:29:56 PM
Quote from: "Katysmom"
Quote from: "klaasend"
Anna and Msmarple - I'll add the the Crime thread:

Posted today (12/3/2006) by Grande at T4N:


Grande wrote:
I don't know if this has been published yet or not, but I am told there was a 16 year old boy was killed last night outside of Carlos & Charlies amounting to the 2nd murder in 10 days.

Here is what I was told;

"Last night there was another killing infront of C&C. A 16 year old boy was killed. From what I heard, there was a fight outside of C&C and the kid was not even involved in the fight. He was at the wrong place at the wrong time. There was no shooting. So, I guess, he was hit and punched and he died. C&C gets very very very busy on weekends. So, a lot of people dont bother going in. They just stand outside the bar, hangout, drink and do drugs and then start fights....Well, that's exactly what happened last night and a young boy lost his life. Well, this is the 2nd murder in 10 days on the one happy island..."


and a follow-up:

Here are a couple other details I have heard...

The alleged suspect was recently released from jail

Was an employee of Tony Romas as of yesterday

Turned himself in today and has apparently taken his own life.

I have no idea how this will be reported and cannot confirm the validity at this point. I am fairly certain on all three accounts. Sorry to be the bearer of bad news regardless of the origin.


Suicide is a lot cheaper for Aruba than a trial.


Heh, heh, yeah, they seem to use it alot.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #553 12/3 - 12/4/2006
Post by: San on December 03, 2006, 11:30:07 PM
From The LineUp with Kimberly Guilfoyle – 12-03-06

First part with Peter De Vries and Jossy Mansur.

Peter De Vries – By Phone

Kimberly:  Dutch Crime Reporter Peter De Vries conducted the investigation.  I asked him about his conversation with Van der Sloot’s first attorney Antonio Carlo.  Listen to this.

Peter:  Well we paid Carlo a visit in his office and we recorded that with candid camera and at first he tried to deny that there had been a meeting with head prosecutor but after a while he realized what we knew and then he got very uncomfortable and admitted that there had been a meeting and that was with the head prosecutor and panicked and he was very uncomfortable with this.

Kimberly:  Now how did Antonio Carlo describe why he met Karin Janssen?

Peter:  Well he didn’t want to tell us very much about it but what we found out that there was a secret meeting and that’s highly unusually because head prosecutor is not allowed to have talks during an investigation with the lawyer or attorney so that’s very strange and also Karin Janssen the head prosecutor wrote us a fax in which she admitted that a meeting took place so it’s impossible to deny that there was a meeting.

Kimberly:  And what was divulged during these meetings.

Peter:  Well in the meeting Mr. Carlo said that he had to clear his conscience and that Joran Van der Sloot played a major part in the disappearance of Natalee Holloway.  No doubt at all that he said that.

Kimberly:  Did he go into any other details in terms of what that means played a major part in the disappearance of Natalee Holloway?

Peter:  Well he then stated to the head prosecutor that it was up to the police and the justice to get the full proof of this but that he wanted to clear his conscience and that yeah they had to do the work.

Kimberly:  And how many letters were exchanged back and forth between them and what information was in those letters?

Peter:  Well the head prosecutor wrote him a letter and she asked for more details and then Mr. Carlo got scared because his tip was certainly on paper and he didn’t expect that because it was a secret meeting and when Karin Janssen put it on paper he realized it was no longer a secret so then he wrote a letter back and denied he had said something like that.

Kimberly:  Now have any of the Aruban or Dutch Officials contacted you about this important information?

Peter:  Yeah they contact me I have several sources in this case and there is really no doubt not for one percent that he said that.

Kimberly:  And what do the investigators make of this?

Peter:  Now they make of this of course that Joran Van der Sloot is responsible for the disappearance of Natalee.

Kimberly:  Wow.  Now you know of course Joran’s current attorney Joe Tacopina said that this is making up facts your fabricating facts there was no such meeting.

Peter:  No then (Peter started laughing) he doesn’t know what happened I think and I have recording with our candid camera which shows the opposite of what he is saying so I don’t think he’s very well informed.

Kimberly:  Alright well Peter thank you so much in joining me tonight and talking about these new developments.

Peter:  OK welcome.

Jossy Mansur by phone:

Kimberly:  I got to ask you what did the former police chief say to you about Joran Van der Sloot and the Kalpoe brother’s involvement in Natalee’s disappearance.

Jossy:  He definitely confirmed that they admitted to the police that they had molested the girl while she was going in and out of consciousness but among other things that he said.

Kimberly:  And how long was this conversation and who specifically did you speak to.

Jossy:  I spoke to Gerald Dompig the conversation took place in my office for about an hour and I have it all on video tape.

Kimberly:  Any why did you video tape it Jossy?

Jossy:  Because as the Diario we usually do that with people we don’t trust to begin with. To have a documented proof of whatever we are going to publish in the future.

Kimberly:  Alright well there are many people who doubt that you have this tape and want to know in fact is contained in this video tape?  Do you have a transcript of this?

Jossy:  You know many people doubt many things I say but after I publish the truth everybody becomes quiet.  They go into a profound silence.  But we have the proof I have the tape the video tape, we have various copies of it made.

Kimberly:  OK and you claim to have a transcript in fact that links the boys to Natalee’s disappearance.  Do you have that for us that you can read a portion of that?

Jossy:  I can read a portion for you for example when I asked him about the case he said well you know we cannot go because we don’t have a body but you have a model crime and on the basis of their own declarations, I’m quoting him at the bottom now and then he said look if it’s not rape they fingered her, they did a lot of things to her according to their own declarations and he we have an article in our penal code that provides an eight year sentence for that.  If you do that to a girl who is not conscious they themselves said that she passed out on (inaudible) phases in the car.  That means if you do that to a person who cannot defend herself it’s eight years.  He told me this (inaudible) I’m quoting from the tape.

Kimberly:  And what else did he tell you?

Jossy:  He told me many other things.  For example you are not talking about Joran alone because while the other guy was driving the car they were making out with the girl in the back.

Kimberly:  And when you say they who was he referring to did he specify the Kalpoe brothers?

Jossy:  He said the Kalpoe brothers with Joran yes.

Kimberly:  Did you ask him why he didn’t do anything with this information and why a case wasn’t presented by the prosecutor?

Jossy:  No because I thought they would proceed on the basis of a model crime because he confirmed that these three suspects admitted this to the police.

Kimberly:  Jossy have you presented this tape to the new police chief or the prosecutor’s office.  Who else has the information?

Jossy:  The tape I only have the tape, I haven’t given it to anyone because so many things have happened in this case and so many mistrusts of who you can trust and who you cannot trust so I will present it to the prosecution when this case goes to court.

Kimberly:  Jossy Mansur thank you for being on with me tonight.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #553 12/3 - 12/4/2006
Post by: cubbeegirl on December 03, 2006, 11:30:19 PM
Quote from: "klaasend"
Anna and Msmarple - I'll add the the Crime thread:

Posted today (12/3/2006) by Grande at T4N:


Grande wrote:
I don't know if this has been published yet or not, but I am told there was a 16 year old boy was killed last night outside of Carlos & Charlies amounting to the 2nd murder in 10 days.

Here is what I was told;

"Last night there was another killing infront of C&C. A 16 year old boy was killed. From what I heard, there was a fight outside of C&C and the kid was not even involved in the fight. He was at the wrong place at the wrong time. There was no shooting. So, I guess, he was hit and punched and he died. C&C gets very very very busy on weekends. So, a lot of people dont bother going in. They just stand outside the bar, hangout, drink and do drugs and then start fights....Well, that's exactly what happened last night and a young boy lost his life. Well, this is the 2nd murder in 10 days on the one happy island..."


and a follow-up:

Here are a couple other details I have heard...

The alleged suspect was recently released from jail

Was an employee of Tony Romas as of yesterday

Turned himself in today and has apparently taken his own life.

I have no idea how this will be reported and cannot confirm the validity at this point. I am fairly certain on all three accounts. Sorry to be the bearer of bad news regardless of the origin.




Another suicide?


Title: Lively Case Discussion #553 12/3 - 12/4/2006
Post by: vms on December 03, 2006, 11:30:26 PM
Frank Rizzo's most recent Aruba visit:

http://www.arubatoday.com/newspaper/November/AT-29-11-06.pdf
Page 1

http://www.arubatoday.com/newspaper/November/AT-28-11-06.pdf
Page 1


Title: Lively Case Discussion #553 12/3 - 12/4/2006
Post by: Jacqueline on December 03, 2006, 11:30:26 PM
I would just like to add a personal comment, real quick.

Tonight on the forum seems like old times to me.

Ideas flying, no drama and lots of great posts.

I just wanted to thank all of you here tonight for being you.

You guys are great. :lol:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #553 12/3 - 12/4/2006
Post by: klaasend on December 03, 2006, 11:31:33 PM
Thank you Jacqueline and San for the transcripts!


Title: Lively Case Discussion #553 12/3 - 12/4/2006
Post by: Anna on December 03, 2006, 11:32:09 PM
.
If Joe M is still on probation, that could be revoked and he could be required to server the balance of his sentence on the gun possession.

Don't have any idea which would be longer, that or the sixty months Jacquie said.  

Gun laws still vary by state, I do know that.  Alabama has very lenient laws on them compared even to Georgia right next door.  For example, I can legally own a stun gun.   :D Now there's a scary thought, isn't it?

(http://i15.photobucket.com/albums/a360/AnnaBlueSkies/Greetings/Holidays%20and%20BD/thBBBB.jpg)


Title: Lively Case Discussion #553 12/3 - 12/4/2006
Post by: Tylergal on December 03, 2006, 11:32:18 PM
Quote from: "Florida"
On BFN..... MIP6 is Mark Purcell    
SandraK is SandraK

Who is REALITY?


There's no reality there at all, none whatsoever, all just repeating the Joe Taco-pee-no line.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #553 12/3 - 12/4/2006
Post by: cubbeegirl on December 03, 2006, 11:32:30 PM
Quote from: "Jacqueline"
I would just like to add a personal comment, real quick.

Tonight on the forum seems like old times to me.

Ideas flying, no drama and lots of great posts.

I just wanted to thank all of you here tonight for being you.

You guys are great. :lol:



Love ya Jacq   :D


Title: Lively Case Discussion #553 12/3 - 12/4/2006
Post by: Tylergal on December 03, 2006, 11:33:58 PM
Quote from: "Anna"
I defer to what other monkeys heard as I can't listen with my jaw on the floor, lol!  His tone was too distracting, I really don't know what the heck he said as I have never heard him like that and was too taken aback by his emotionality.

.

(http://i15.photobucket.com/albums/a360/AnnaBlueSkies/Greetings/Holidays%20and%20BD/thT2GoYorkieSantaHHolidays-vi.gif)


Makes you wonder if Joe has to deliver on this before he gets the dough and he sees the yeast is not rising for him.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #553 12/3 - 12/4/2006
Post by: crazybabyborg on December 03, 2006, 11:34:08 PM
Jacq.............your transcripts are so very helpful; THANKS!  :wink:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #553 12/3 - 12/4/2006
Post by: Dana on December 03, 2006, 11:34:26 PM
Quote from: "San"
From The LineUp with Kimberly Guilfoyle – 12-03-06

First part with Peter De Vries and Jossy Mansur.

Peter De Vries – By Phone

Kimberly:  Dutch Crime Reporter Peter De Vries conducted the investigation.  I asked him about his conversation with Van der Sloot’s first attorney Antonio Carlo.  Listen to this.

Peter:  Well we paid Carlo a visit in his office and we recorded that with candid camera and at first he tried to deny that there had been a meeting with head prosecutor but after a while he realized what we knew and then he got very uncomfortable and admitted that there had been a meeting and that was with the head prosecutor and panicked and he was very uncomfortable with this.

Kimberly:  Now how did Antonio Carlo describe why he met Karin Janssen?

Peter:  Well he didn’t want to tell us very much about it but what we found out that there was a secret meeting and that’s highly unusually because head prosecutor is not allowed to have talks during an investigation with the lawyer or attorney so that’s very strange and also Karin Janssen the head prosecutor wrote us a fax in which she admitted that a meeting took place so it’s impossible to deny that there was a meeting.

Kimberly:  And what was divulged during these meetings.

Peter:  Well in the meeting Mr. Carlo said that he had to clear his conscience and that Joran Van der Sloot played a major part in the disappearance of Natalee Holloway.  No doubt at all that he said that.

Kimberly:  Did he go into any other details in terms of what that means played a major part in the disappearance of Natalee Holloway?

Peter:  Well he then stated to the head prosecutor that it was up to the police and the justice to get the full proof of this but that he wanted to clear his conscience and that yeah they had to do the work.

Kimberly:  And how many letters were exchanged back and forth between them and what information was in those letters?

Peter:  Well the head prosecutor wrote him a letter and she asked for more details and then Mr. Carlo got scared because his tip was certainly on paper and he didn’t expect that because it was a secret meeting and when Karin Janssen put it on paper he realized it was no longer a secret so then he wrote a letter back and denied he had said something like that.

Kimberly:  Now have any of the Aruban or Dutch Officials contacted you about this important information?

Peter:  Yeah they contact me I have several sources in this case and there is really no doubt not for one percent that he said that.

Kimberly:  And what do the investigators make of this?

Peter:  Now they make of this of course that Joran Van der Sloot is responsible for the disappearance of Natalee.

Kimberly:  Wow.  Now you know of course Joran’s current attorney Joe Tacopina said that this is making up facts your fabricating facts there was no such meeting.

Peter:  No then (Peter started laughing) he doesn’t know what happened I think and I have recording with our candid camera which shows the opposite of what he is saying so I don’t think he’s very well informed.

Kimberly:  Alright well Peter thank you so much in joining me tonight and talking about these new developments.

Peter:  OK welcome.

Jossy Mansur by phone:

Kimberly:  I got to ask you what did the former police chief say to you about Joran Van der Sloot and the Kalpoe brother’s involvement in Natalee’s disappearance.

Jossy:  He definitely confirmed that they admitted to the police that they had molested the girl while she was going in and out of consciousness but among other things that he said.

Kimberly:  And how long was this conversation and who specifically did you speak to.

Jossy:  I spoke to Gerald Dompig the conversation took place in my office for about an hour and I have it all on video tape.

Kimberly:  Any why did you video tape it Jossy?

Jossy:  Because as the Diario we usually do that with people we don’t trust to begin with. To have a documented proof of whatever we are going to publish in the future.

Kimberly:  Alright well there are many people who doubt that you have this tape and want to know in fact is contained in this video tape?  Do you have a transcript of this?

Jossy:  You know many people doubt many things I say but after I publish the truth everybody becomes quiet.  They go into a profound silence.  But we have the proof I have the tape the video tape, we have various copies of it made.

Kimberly:  OK and you claim to have a transcript in fact that links the boys to Natalee’s disappearance.  Do you have that for us that you can read a portion of that?

Jossy:  I can read a portion for you for example when I asked him about the case he said well you know we cannot go because we don’t have a body but you have a model crime and on the basis of their own declarations, I’m quoting him at the bottom now and then he said look if it’s not rape they fingered her, they did a lot of things to her according to their own declarations and he we have an article in our penal code that provides an eight year sentence for that.  If you do that to a girl who is not conscious they themselves said that she passed out on (inaudible) phases in the car.  That means if you do that to a person who cannot defend herself it’s eight years.  He told me this (inaudible) I’m quoting from the tape.

Kimberly:  And what else did he tell you?

Jossy:  He told me many other things.  For example you are not talking about Joran alone because while the other guy was driving the car they were making out with the girl in the back.

Kimberly:  And when you say they who was he referring to did he specify the Kalpoe brothers?

Jossy:  He said the Kalpoe brothers with Joran yes.

Kimberly:  Did you ask him why he didn’t do anything with this information and why a case wasn’t presented by the prosecutor?

Jossy:  No because I thought they would proceed on the basis of a model crime because he confirmed that these three suspects admitted this to the police.

Kimberly:  Jossy have you presented this tape to the new police chief or the prosecutor’s office.  Who else has the information?

Jossy:  The tape I only have the tape, I haven’t given it to anyone because so many things have happened in this case and so many mistrusts of who you can trust and who you cannot trust so I will present it to the prosecution when this case goes to court.

Kimberly:  Jossy Mansur thank you for being on with me tonight.


good job jossY


Title: Lively Case Discussion #553 12/3 - 12/4/2006
Post by: Tylergal on December 03, 2006, 11:34:47 PM
Quote from: "LilPuma"
Question for the Monkey Brain Trust:  

Is there a correlation between Joe Mammana's recent problems and the case against J2K heating up?  Think.  Ponder.
ABSODAMNLUTELY.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #553 12/3 - 12/4/2006
Post by: San on December 03, 2006, 11:34:51 PM
Quote from: "San"
Jossy said it has been definately been confirmed that they molested the girl while she was going in and out of consciousness.

Jossy has a tape and he has many copies of it.  He usually makes tapes of people he doesn't trust.  If it is not rape, they strangled her and they did a lot of things to her.  He told Jossy many other things.  He said he will present it to the prosecutor when the case goes to court.


Correction after listening to this again I realized I heard the wrong word.  SORRY ABOUT THAT FOLKS.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #553 12/3 - 12/4/2006
Post by: crazybabyborg on December 03, 2006, 11:35:50 PM
Did you notice that Beth didn't ask Jossy to turn the tape over to anyone (KJ)? I think she's most comfortable with it being in Jossy's hands.

I worry about Jossy's safety sometimes.............


Title: Lively Case Discussion #553 12/3 - 12/4/2006
Post by: Jacqueline on December 03, 2006, 11:35:54 PM
Quote from: "crazybabyborg"
Jacq.............your transcripts are so very helpful; THANKS!  :wink:


I wish I could do more for this case.

Just a small contribution compared to what so many others (Klaas) have done and continue to do.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #553 12/3 - 12/4/2006
Post by: Jacqueline on December 03, 2006, 11:36:40 PM
Quote from: "cubbeegirl"
Quote from: "Jacqueline"
I would just like to add a personal comment, real quick.

Tonight on the forum seems like old times to me.

Ideas flying, no drama and lots of great posts.

I just wanted to thank all of you here tonight for being you.

You guys are great. :lol:



Love ya Jacq   :D


Back at ya :wink:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #553 12/3 - 12/4/2006
Post by: Angiex911dsptchr on December 03, 2006, 11:37:06 PM
Ty San and Jackie~!!!!!!!!!  :)

Oh gee SAN.. one damn typo and you are gonna apologize  ROFL
Imagine if I typed it :shock:   :wink:  to my piezon! :)


Title: Lively Case Discussion #553 12/3 - 12/4/2006
Post by: Hotshot on December 03, 2006, 11:38:17 PM
Quote
Suicide is a lot cheaper for Aruba than a trial.
And then he will burn himself and bury himself too....  So where does Jamie work these days... :lol:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #553 12/3 - 12/4/2006
Post by: Angiex911dsptchr on December 03, 2006, 11:38:20 PM
Quote from: "Jacqueline"
I would just like to add a personal comment, real quick.

Tonight on the forum seems like old times to me.

Ideas flying, no drama and lots of great posts.

I just wanted to thank all of you here tonight for being you.

You guys are great. :lol:


 :)  it does Jackie.. cept for a few missing one. :(  (posters I mean..lol)


Title: Lively Case Discussion #553 12/3 - 12/4/2006
Post by: Jacqueline on December 03, 2006, 11:38:51 PM
Quote from: "Angiex911dsptchr"
Ty San and Jackie~!!!!!!!!!  :)

Oh gee SAN.. one damn typo and you are gonna apologize  ROFL
Imagine if I typed it :shock:   :wink:  to my piezon! :)



 :lol:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #553 12/3 - 12/4/2006
Post by: Katysmom on December 03, 2006, 11:39:08 PM
Good night monkeys.  The repeat of the Lineup will be on in a few minutes and I am going to snuggle up on the couch to watch it.  Have a good one and remember to say a prayer for Natalee tonight.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #553 12/3 - 12/4/2006
Post by: crazybabyborg on December 03, 2006, 11:39:36 PM
Why would anyone on Aruba commit suicide because they were facing a trial? They don't convict the guilty!


Title: Lively Case Discussion #553 12/3 - 12/4/2006
Post by: Tylergal on December 03, 2006, 11:40:01 PM
Quote from: "Dana"
Quote from: "Jacqueline"
Quote from: "Dana"
Quote from: "crazybabyborg"
I want Beth to file an obstruction of justice suit. It may not bring the perps down but they will wear the banner of OJ more snugly as a result!


where is john q kelley during all of this ?


Yes, that is a good question.


these dopey fox news shows bring on beth to fend for herself against these high priced ny lawyers, john q should be there with her.


Unless it is to let the public see how Beth has had to fight almost single-handedly and work for any support she got the good old American way, by busting her buns, while Joe screams, yells and gets his peanut gallery at the wacko sites to do more hollering for him while he is out chasing more ambulances.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #553 12/3 - 12/4/2006
Post by: crazybabyborg on December 03, 2006, 11:40:29 PM
Quote from: "Katysmom"
Good night monkeys.  The repeat of the Lineup will be on in a few minutes and I am going to snuggle up on the couch to watch it.  Have a good one and remember to say a prayer for Natalee tonight.


Night Katysmom! Snuggle warm!


Title: Lively Case Discussion #553 12/3 - 12/4/2006
Post by: Jacqueline on December 03, 2006, 11:40:37 PM
Quote from: "Angiex911dsptchr"
Quote from: "Jacqueline"
I would just like to add a personal comment, real quick.

Tonight on the forum seems like old times to me.

Ideas flying, no drama and lots of great posts.

I just wanted to thank all of you here tonight for being you.

You guys are great. :lol:


 :)  it does Jackie.. cept for a few missing one. :(  (posters I mean..lol)


Yes, I know. :cry:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #553 12/3 - 12/4/2006
Post by: LilPuma on December 03, 2006, 11:40:48 PM
Jossy has a tape of Dompig saying the boys admitted to raping Natalee.  JoeT keeps mentioning the Skeeters tapes.  I've always thought it odd that no capitalistic attorney - Aruban or US - took this case on contingency.  After all, if it's as bogus as JoeT and Arlene claim with verification of that by one of the most highly respected forensic organizations on planet Earth, it would be a slam dunk law suit.  So why has no one sued Skeeters and Dr. Phil?  I'll tell you why.  Because the tapes were legit and Deepak's statements were not misrepresented on Dr. Phil's show.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #553 12/3 - 12/4/2006
Post by: robots on December 03, 2006, 11:42:34 PM
Quote from: "LilPuma"
Jossy has a tape of Dompig saying the boys admitted to raping Natalee.  JoeT keeps mentioning the Skeeters tapes.  I've always thought it odd that no capitalistic attorney - Aruban or US - took this case on contingency.  After all, if it's as bogus as JoeT and Arlene claim with verification of that by one of the most highly respected forensic organizations on planet Earth, it would be a slam dunk law suit.  So why has no one sued Skeeters and Dr. Phil?  I'll tell you why.  Because the tapes were legit and Deepak's statements were not misrepresented on Dr. Phil's show.



BINGO  8)


Title: Lively Case Discussion #553 12/3 - 12/4/2006
Post by: 2NJSons_Mom on December 03, 2006, 11:42:57 PM
Quote from: "Jacqueline"
I would just like to add a personal comment, real quick.

Tonight on the forum seems like old times to me.

Ideas flying, no drama and lots of great posts.

I just wanted to thank all of you here tonight for being you.

You guys are great. :lol:


It is good.

Jacq & San, thanks for the transcripts.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #553 12/3 - 12/4/2006
Post by: crazybabyborg on December 03, 2006, 11:43:11 PM
Quote from: "Tylergal"
Quote from: "Dana"
Quote from: "Jacqueline"
Quote from: "Dana"
Quote from: "crazybabyborg"
I want Beth to file an obstruction of justice suit. It may not bring the perps down but they will wear the banner of OJ more snugly as a result!


where is john q kelley during all of this ?


Yes, that is a good question.


these dopey fox news shows bring on beth to fend for herself against these high priced ny lawyers, john q should be there with her.


Unless it is to let the public see how Beth has had to fight almost single-handedly and work for any support she got the good old American way, by busting her buns, while Joe screams, yells and gets his peanut gallery at the wacko sites to do more hollering for him while he is out chasing more ambulances.


Exactly, Tyler. She handles herself with truth and dignity and composure. She's a different species than Tacky: far more evolved! Hey! You know those caveman commercials? I nominate Tacky to carry the next club!


Title: Lively Case Discussion #553 12/3 - 12/4/2006
Post by: LilPuma on December 03, 2006, 11:43:45 PM
Quote from: "cubbeegirl"
Quote from: "klaasend"
Anna and Msmarple - I'll add the the Crime thread:

Posted today (12/3/2006) by Grande at T4N:


Grande wrote:
I don't know if this has been published yet or not, but I am told there was a 16 year old boy was killed last night outside of Carlos & Charlies amounting to the 2nd murder in 10 days.

Here is what I was told;

"Last night there was another killing infront of C&C. A 16 year old boy was killed. From what I heard, there was a fight outside of C&C and the kid was not even involved in the fight. He was at the wrong place at the wrong time. There was no shooting. So, I guess, he was hit and punched and he died. C&C gets very very very busy on weekends. So, a lot of people dont bother going in. They just stand outside the bar, hangout, drink and do drugs and then start fights....Well, that's exactly what happened last night and a young boy lost his life. Well, this is the 2nd murder in 10 days on the one happy island..."


and a follow-up:

Here are a couple other details I have heard...

The alleged suspect was recently released from jail

Was an employee of Tony Romas as of yesterday

Turned himself in today and has apparently taken his own life.

I have no idea how this will be reported and cannot confirm the validity at this point. I am fairly certain on all three accounts. Sorry to be the bearer of bad news regardless of the origin.




Another suicide?


The suspect was local if he worked at Tony Romas, but what about the boy who got hit and died?  Was he a local or tourist?


Title: Lively Case Discussion #553 12/3 - 12/4/2006
Post by: Angiex911dsptchr on December 03, 2006, 11:44:41 PM
Klaas.. you  have mail  :)


Title: Lively Case Discussion #553 12/3 - 12/4/2006
Post by: Tylergal on December 03, 2006, 11:45:57 PM
Quote from: "igsigs"
Quote from: "Anna"

Remember Joe T had his detractors when he asked the City of Philadelphia I think it was to join the boycott?  And the detective who Paulus I think it was hired, Ruzzio of the dirty tricks if from there, isn't he?

Les Levine = Joe T. dirty trickster

Rizzo = Philly politician with Aruban investments.


Rizzo from Chicago is the detective that I understood was "hired for" the Sloots and not by them, and also related to frank Rizzo of Philadelphia, who retired to Aruba with a lot of money to invest that he had gotten from questionable sources, and I believe he still resides there, possibly avoiding taxes.

Just google eddie Rizzo, detective from Chicago.  I once had a whole file on him but deleted it all.  He is a sleeze bag associated with some high-profile, low-moral people.  He used to be on Fox in the morning arguing for the Sloots (not on Fox & Friends but some other programs) and that was before I learned he had been "hired for" the sloots.  So there must be a whole lot of worry to hire this guy; he usually works for people like senators, presidents (who want to dig up dirt on old girlfriends).


Title: Lively Case Discussion #553 12/3 - 12/4/2006
Post by: San on December 03, 2006, 11:47:04 PM
Quote from: "klaasend"
Wonder how much A.H.A.T.A is paying Joe?  :lol:

(http://i37.photobucket.com/albums/e82/klaasend2/diaperJOE.jpg)


 :lol:  :lol:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #553 12/3 - 12/4/2006
Post by: Tylergal on December 03, 2006, 11:47:09 PM
Quote from: "2NJSons_Mom"
Quote from: "Jacqueline"
They had a search warrant for his house (why, I don't know) but in searching they found a gun on his nightstand.

If he is being investigated for tax too, maybe they were there in conjunction with that...


Dana may know better, but this is what I was thinking...something lead them to his home...not sure if $/tax was first or if gun possession was...seems likely that the tax thing lead to the the home...jmo.


deja vous, Dillinger?


Title: Lively Case Discussion #553 12/3 - 12/4/2006
Post by: Carnut on December 03, 2006, 11:48:05 PM
Quote from: "Tylergal"
Quote from: "Anna"
I defer to what other monkeys heard as I can't listen with my jaw on the floor, lol!  His tone was too distracting, I really don't know what the heck he said as I have never heard him like that and was too taken aback by his emotionality.

.

(http://i15.photobucket.com/albums/a360/AnnaBlueSkies/Greetings/Holidays%20and%20BD/thT2GoYorkieSantaHHolidays-vi.gif)


Makes you wonder if Joe has to deliver on this before he gets the dough and he sees the yeast is not rising for him.


Yeah, kind of a reverse reward thing, JVDS gets cleared before getting paid.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #553 12/3 - 12/4/2006
Post by: LilPuma on December 03, 2006, 11:48:21 PM
Quote from: "Dana"

these dopey fox news shows bring on beth to fend for herself against these high priced ny lawyers, john q should be there with her.


I agree, Dana.  Hearing people like Drew Kessy, Dave Holloway, Tim Miller on your show, and seeing Beth on TV, I remember a quote that's always stuck with me (although I can't remember who said it):  

Courage doesn't always shout.  
Sometimes it's a quiet voice at the end of the day that says "I'll try again tomorrow."  


Title: Lively Case Discussion #553 12/3 - 12/4/2006
Post by: bleachedblack on December 03, 2006, 11:48:55 PM
Quote from: "Hotshot"
Quote
Suicide is a lot cheaper for Aruba than a trial.
And then he will burn himself and bury himself too....  So where does Jamie work these days... :lol:


Reading through , saw your question.....can say that as of July he was a busboy at Tony Romas.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #553 12/3 - 12/4/2006
Post by: Tylergal on December 03, 2006, 11:49:24 PM
Quote from: "klaasend"
Anna and Msmarple - I'll add the the Crime thread:

Posted today (12/3/2006) by Grande at T4N:


Grande wrote:
I don't know if this has been published yet or not, but I am told there was a 16 year old boy was killed last night outside of Carlos & Charlies amounting to the 2nd murder in 10 days.

Here is what I was told;

"Last night there was another killing infront of C&C. A 16 year old boy was killed. From what I heard, there was a fight outside of C&C and the kid was not even involved in the fight. He was at the wrong place at the wrong time. There was no shooting. So, I guess, he was hit and punched and he died. C&C gets very very very busy on weekends. So, a lot of people dont bother going in. They just stand outside the bar, hangout, drink and do drugs and then start fights....Well, that's exactly what happened last night and a young boy lost his life. Well, this is the 2nd murder in 10 days on the one happy island..."


and a follow-up:

Here are a couple other details I have heard...

The alleged suspect was recently released from jail

Was an employee of Tony Romas as of yesterday

Turned himself in today and has apparently taken his own life.

I have no idea how this will be reported and cannot confirm the validity at this point. I am fairly certain on all three accounts. Sorry to be the bearer of bad news regardless of the origin.


Uh oh, another arubicide.  Makes you wonder what the real truth is.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #553 12/3 - 12/4/2006
Post by: cubbeegirl on December 03, 2006, 11:50:40 PM
Well monkeyfaces, I am going to call it a night myself, actually I was headed in that direction right before Joe Taco went on his rant and then I couldn't think about going to sleep. I knew the cage would be hopping!
Catch y'all tomorrow.....


Title: Lively Case Discussion #553 12/3 - 12/4/2006
Post by: Tylergal on December 03, 2006, 11:51:31 PM
Quote from: "San"
From The LineUp with Kimberly Guilfoyle – 12-03-06

First part with Peter De Vries and Jossy Mansur.

Peter De Vries – By Phone

Kimberly:  Dutch Crime Reporter Peter De Vries conducted the investigation.  I asked him about his conversation with Van der Sloot’s first attorney Antonio Carlo.  Listen to this.

Peter:  Well we paid Carlo a visit in his office and we recorded that with candid camera and at first he tried to deny that there had been a meeting with head prosecutor but after a while he realized what we knew and then he got very uncomfortable and admitted that there had been a meeting and that was with the head prosecutor and panicked and he was very uncomfortable with this.

Kimberly:  Now how did Antonio Carlo describe why he met Karin Janssen?

Peter:  Well he didn’t want to tell us very much about it but what we found out that there was a secret meeting and that’s highly unusually because head prosecutor is not allowed to have talks during an investigation with the lawyer or attorney so that’s very strange and also Karin Janssen the head prosecutor wrote us a fax in which she admitted that a meeting took place so it’s impossible to deny that there was a meeting.

Kimberly:  And what was divulged during these meetings.

Peter:  Well in the meeting Mr. Carlo said that he had to clear his conscience and that Joran Van der Sloot played a major part in the disappearance of Natalee Holloway.  No doubt at all that he said that.

Kimberly:  Did he go into any other details in terms of what that means played a major part in the disappearance of Natalee Holloway?

Peter:  Well he then stated to the head prosecutor that it was up to the police and the justice to get the full proof of this but that he wanted to clear his conscience and that yeah they had to do the work.

Kimberly:  And how many letters were exchanged back and forth between them and what information was in those letters?

Peter:  Well the head prosecutor wrote him a letter and she asked for more details and then Mr. Carlo got scared because his tip was certainly on paper and he didn’t expect that because it was a secret meeting and when Karin Janssen put it on paper he realized it was no longer a secret so then he wrote a letter back and denied he had said something like that.

Kimberly:  Now have any of the Aruban or Dutch Officials contacted you about this important information?

Peter:  Yeah they contact me I have several sources in this case and there is really no doubt not for one percent that he said that.

Kimberly:  And what do the investigators make of this?

Peter:  Now they make of this of course that Joran Van der Sloot is responsible for the disappearance of Natalee.

Kimberly:  Wow.  Now you know of course Joran’s current attorney Joe Tacopina said that this is making up facts your fabricating facts there was no such meeting.

Peter:  No then (Peter started laughing) he doesn’t know what happened I think and I have recording with our candid camera which shows the opposite of what he is saying so I don’t think he’s very well informed.

Kimberly:  Alright well Peter thank you so much in joining me tonight and talking about these new developments.

Peter:  OK welcome.

Jossy Mansur by phone:

Kimberly:  I got to ask you what did the former police chief say to you about Joran Van der Sloot and the Kalpoe brother’s involvement in Natalee’s disappearance.

Jossy:  He definitely confirmed that they admitted to the police that they had molested the girl while she was going in and out of consciousness but among other things that he said.

Kimberly:  And how long was this conversation and who specifically did you speak to.

Jossy:  I spoke to Gerald Dompig the conversation took place in my office for about an hour and I have it all on video tape.

Kimberly:  Any why did you video tape it Jossy?

Jossy:  Because as the Diario we usually do that with people we don’t trust to begin with. To have a documented proof of whatever we are going to publish in the future.

Kimberly:  Alright well there are many people who doubt that you have this tape and want to know in fact is contained in this video tape?  Do you have a transcript of this?

Jossy:  You know many people doubt many things I say but after I publish the truth everybody becomes quiet.  They go into a profound silence.  But we have the proof I have the tape the video tape, we have various copies of it made.

Kimberly:  OK and you claim to have a transcript in fact that links the boys to Natalee’s disappearance.  Do you have that for us that you can read a portion of that?

Jossy:  I can read a portion for you for example when I asked him about the case he said well you know we cannot go because we don’t have a body but you have a model crime and on the basis of their own declarations, I’m quoting him at the bottom now and then he said look if it’s not rape they fingered her, they did a lot of things to her according to their own declarations and he we have an article in our penal code that provides an eight year sentence for that.  If you do that to a girl who is not conscious they themselves said that she passed out on (inaudible) phases in the car.  That means if you do that to a person who cannot defend herself it’s eight years.  He told me this (inaudible) I’m quoting from the tape.

Kimberly:  And what else did he tell you?

Jossy:  He told me many other things.  For example you are not talking about Joran alone because while the other guy was driving the car they were making out with the girl in the back.

Kimberly:  And when you say they who was he referring to did he specify the Kalpoe brothers?

Jossy:  He said the Kalpoe brothers with Joran yes.

Kimberly:  Did you ask him why he didn’t do anything with this information and why a case wasn’t presented by the prosecutor?

Jossy:  No because I thought they would proceed on the basis of a model crime because he confirmed that these three suspects admitted this to the police.

Kimberly:  Jossy have you presented this tape to the new police chief or the prosecutor’s office.  Who else has the information?

Jossy:  The tape I only have the tape, I haven’t given it to anyone because so many things have happened in this case and so many mistrusts of who you can trust and who you cannot trust so I will present it to the prosecution when this case goes to court.

Kimberly:  Jossy Mansur thank you for being on with me tonight.


Thank you so much, Sweetie, and thank you too, Jacquie.  You two are so sweet to do this.  We love you both a whole lot.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #553 12/3 - 12/4/2006
Post by: LilPuma on December 03, 2006, 11:52:22 PM
Quote from: "Katysmom"
Good night monkeys.  The repeat of the Lineup will be on in a few minutes and I am going to snuggle up on the couch to watch it.  Have a good one and remember to say a prayer for Natalee tonight.


Night Katysmom!  Sleep well.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #553 12/3 - 12/4/2006
Post by: Tylergal on December 03, 2006, 11:52:34 PM
Quote from: "cubbeegirl"
Quote from: "Jacqueline"
I would just like to add a personal comment, real quick.

Tonight on the forum seems like old times to me.

Ideas flying, no drama and lots of great posts.

I just wanted to thank all of you here tonight for being you.

You guys are great. :lol:



Love ya Jacq   :D


Hugs to you, Jacq.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #553 12/3 - 12/4/2006
Post by: vms on December 03, 2006, 11:52:57 PM
Quote from: "Tylergal"
Quote from: "igsigs"
Quote from: "Anna"

Remember Joe T had his detractors when he asked the City of Philadelphia I think it was to join the boycott?  And the detective who Paulus I think it was hired, Ruzzio of the dirty tricks if from there, isn't he?

Les Levine = Joe T. dirty trickster

Rizzo = Philly politician with Aruban investments.


Rizzo from Chicago is the detective that I understood was "hired for" the Sloots and not by them, and also related to frank Rizzo of Philadelphia, who retired to Aruba with a lot of money to invest that he had gotten from questionable sources, and I believe he still resides there, possibly avoiding taxes.

Just google eddie Rizzo, detective from Chicago.  I once had a whole file on him but deleted it all.  He is a sleeze bag associated with some high-profile, low-moral people.  He used to be on Fox in the morning arguing for the Sloots (not on Fox & Friends but some other programs) and that was before I learned he had been "hired for" the sloots.  So there must be a whole lot of worry to hire this guy; he usually works for people like senators, presidents (who want to dig up dirt on old girlfriends).


Ernie Rizzo died in October.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #553 12/3 - 12/4/2006
Post by: 2NJSons_Mom on December 03, 2006, 11:53:04 PM
Quote from: "Tylergal"
Quote from: "2NJSons_Mom"
Quote from: "Jacqueline"
They had a search warrant for his house (why, I don't know) but in searching they found a gun on his nightstand.

If he is being investigated for tax too, maybe they were there in conjunction with that...


Dana may know better, but this is what I was thinking...something lead them to his home...not sure if $/tax was first or if gun possession was...seems likely that the tax thing lead to the the home...jmo.


deja vous, Dillinger?


You're ahead of me, here, Tyler.  Glad I wasn't around for Dillinger......


Title: Lively Case Discussion #553 12/3 - 12/4/2006
Post by: Anna on December 03, 2006, 11:53:15 PM
Check out the article that VMS just posted at

http://www.arubatoday.com/newspaper/November/AT-28-11-06.pdf

Frank Ruzzio with his new wife, Councilman at large in Aruba, having celebration at the Bucaneer Restaurant, photo by Angela, police force friends in attendance, the whole gangs there!!  


 :shock:

I thought he was out of this but guess with that kind of investments, he is really mad at Joe M for his part in the boycott and causing time shares, etc, to decline so in value!!


.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #553 12/3 - 12/4/2006
Post by: Carnut on December 03, 2006, 11:53:26 PM
Quote from: "Tylergal"
Quote from: "igsigs"
Quote from: "Anna"

Remember Joe T had his detractors when he asked the City of Philadelphia I think it was to join the boycott?  And the detective who Paulus I think it was hired, Ruzzio of the dirty tricks if from there, isn't he?

Les Levine = Joe T. dirty trickster

Rizzo = Philly politician with Aruban investments.


Rizzo from Chicago is the detective that I understood was "hired for" the Sloots and not by them, and also related to frank Rizzo of Philadelphia, who retired to Aruba with a lot of money to invest that he had gotten from questionable sources, and I believe he still resides there, possibly avoiding taxes.

Just google eddie Rizzo, detective from Chicago.  I once had a whole file on him but deleted it all.  He is a sleeze bag associated with some high-profile, low-moral people.  He used to be on Fox in the morning arguing for the Sloots (not on Fox & Friends but some other programs) and that was before I learned he had been "hired for" the sloots.  So there must be a whole lot of worry to hire this guy; he usually works for people like senators, presidents (who want to dig up dirt on old girlfriends).


Isn't that just another example that there is a whole lot of money coming from somewhere to pay all these folks to keep anyone from getting convicted in this case?


Title: Lively Case Discussion #553 12/3 - 12/4/2006
Post by: LilPuma on December 03, 2006, 11:53:47 PM
Quote from: "Tylergal"
Uh oh, another arubicide.  Makes you wonder what the real truth is.


Arubicide.  I like it.  Sad, but true.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #553 12/3 - 12/4/2006
Post by: Tylergal on December 03, 2006, 11:54:53 PM
Quote from: "Angiex911dsptchr"
Ty San and Jackie~!!!!!!!!!  :)

Oh gee SAN.. one damn typo and you are gonna apologize  ROFL
Imagine if I typed it :shock:   :wink:  to my piezon! :)


Oh, Angie.  When you have done the transcript, you did not make any errors.  You did not make errors with your recipes.  You just really get focused when you know it is important, (we all do that)!


Title: Lively Case Discussion #553 12/3 - 12/4/2006
Post by: LilPuma on December 03, 2006, 11:55:03 PM
Quote from: "Carnut"
Isn't that just another example that there is a whole lot of money coming from somewhere to pay all these folks to keep anyone from getting convicted in this case?


The old addage Follow the Money is so true in this case.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #553 12/3 - 12/4/2006
Post by: Carnut on December 03, 2006, 11:55:35 PM
Quote from: "LilPuma"
Quote from: "Tylergal"
Uh oh, another arubicide.  Makes you wonder what the real truth is.


Arubicide.  I like it.  Sad, but true.


It appears I've just added another new word to my vocabulary.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #553 12/3 - 12/4/2006
Post by: Tylergal on December 03, 2006, 11:55:41 PM
Quote from: "Katysmom"
Good night monkeys.  The repeat of the Lineup will be on in a few minutes and I am going to snuggle up on the couch to watch it.  Have a good one and remember to say a prayer for Natalee tonight.


Goodnight, Katysmom.  Snuggle in and stay warm.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #553 12/3 - 12/4/2006
Post by: Anna on December 03, 2006, 11:57:27 PM
Quote from: "vms"
[Ernie Rizzo died in October.


I was thinking it was Frank and so he wouldn't be bothering Joe M but Ernie, is that one the nasty detective?  Ernie and not Eddie?

Frank is certainly alive and well and well invested in Aruba it seems.

(http://i15.photobucket.com/albums/a360/AnnaBlueSkies/Greetings/Holidays%20and%20BD/thSanta-10-june.gif)


Title: Lively Case Discussion #553 12/3 - 12/4/2006
Post by: San on December 03, 2006, 11:58:19 PM
Quote from: "Tylergal"
Quote from: "igsigs"
Quote from: "Anna"

Remember Joe T had his detractors when he asked the City of Philadelphia I think it was to join the boycott?  And the detective who Paulus I think it was hired, Ruzzio of the dirty tricks if from there, isn't he?

Les Levine = Joe T. dirty trickster

Rizzo = Philly politician with Aruban investments.


Rizzo from Chicago is the detective that I understood was "hired for" the Sloots and not by them, and also related to frank Rizzo of Philadelphia, who retired to Aruba with a lot of money to invest that he had gotten from questionable sources, and I believe he still resides there, possibly avoiding taxes.

Just google eddie Rizzo, detective from Chicago.  I once had a whole file on him but deleted it all.  He is a sleeze bag associated with some high-profile, low-moral people.  He used to be on Fox in the morning arguing for the Sloots (not on Fox & Friends but some other programs) and that was before I learned he had been "hired for" the sloots.  So there must be a whole lot of worry to hire this guy; he usually works for people like senators, presidents (who want to dig up dirt on old girlfriends).

I thought this guy recently died.  I think it might have been the same condition that John Ritter died from.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #553 12/3 - 12/4/2006
Post by: bleachedblack on December 03, 2006, 11:58:33 PM
Quote from: "Anna"
Check out the article that VMS just posted at

http://www.arubatoday.com/newspaper/November/AT-28-11-06.pdf

Frank Ruzzio with his new wife, Councilman at large in Aruba, having celebration at the Bucaneer Restaurant, photo by Angela, police force friends in attendance, the whole gangs there!!  


 :shock:

I thought he was out of this but guess with that kind of investments, he is really mad at Joe M for his part in the boycott and causing time shares, etc, to decline so in value!!


.


Sorry for this OT but didn't want it to go un-noticed but at the very bottom of the page of the link you posted to read about Rizzo is a pic of Rafael Correa presidential candidate in Equador ....let me just say HE GETS MY VOTE  :!:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #553 12/3 - 12/4/2006
Post by: Dana on December 03, 2006, 11:59:17 PM
Quote from: "Tylergal"
Quote from: "Angiex911dsptchr"
Ty San and Jackie~!!!!!!!!!  :)

Oh gee SAN.. one damn typo and you are gonna apologize  ROFL
Imagine if I typed it :shock:   :wink:  to my piezon! :)


Oh, Angie.  When you have done the transcript, you did not make any errors.  You did not make errors with your recipes.  You just really get focused when you know it is important, (we all do that)!



well folks im sure it will be a very interesting week ahead, lets hope for some positive news for the good guys :-)


Title: Lively Case Discussion #553 12/3 - 12/4/2006
Post by: 2NJSons_Mom on December 03, 2006, 11:59:28 PM
Goodnight, all & y'all.   :lol:  :wink:

See ya tomorrow, sometime.  God Bless.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #553 12/3 - 12/4/2006
Post by: Tylergal on December 03, 2006, 11:59:35 PM
Quote from: "vms"
Quote from: "Tylergal"
Quote from: "igsigs"
Quote from: "Anna"

Remember Joe T had his detractors when he asked the City of Philadelphia I think it was to join the boycott?  And the detective who Paulus I think it was hired, Ruzzio of the dirty tricks if from there, isn't he?

Les Levine = Joe T. dirty trickster

Rizzo = Philly politician with Aruban investments.


Rizzo from Chicago is the detective that I understood was "hired for" the Sloots and not by them, and also related to frank Rizzo of Philadelphia, who retired to Aruba with a lot of money to invest that he had gotten from questionable sources, and I believe he still resides there, possibly avoiding taxes.

Just google eddie Rizzo, detective from Chicago.  I once had a whole file on him but deleted it all.  He is a sleeze bag associated with some high-profile, low-moral people.  He used to be on Fox in the morning arguing for the Sloots (not on Fox & Friends but some other programs) and that was before I learned he had been "hired for" the sloots.  So there must be a whole lot of worry to hire this guy; he usually works for people like senators, presidents (who want to dig up dirt on old girlfriends).


Ernie Rizzo died in October.


That's it, Ernie.  He was always called "fast Eddie" and worked for a lot of  :twisted:  people.  What happened to him?  Did he really die or commit suicide in Aruba?


Title: Lively Case Discussion #553 12/3 - 12/4/2006
Post by: Anna on December 04, 2006, 12:01:05 AM
.
Anone still up when the Fox report replays, listen and see if you can hear any more or tell any more of what Joe T is saying after his voice reaches that pitch only dogs can usually hear.

I will try, too.


(http://i15.photobucket.com/albums/a360/AnnaBlueSkies/Greetings/Holidays%20and%20BD/thATTB10.gif)


Title: Lively Case Discussion #553 12/3 - 12/4/2006
Post by: Tylergal on December 04, 2006, 12:03:03 AM
Rizzo was working with or associated with Tony Pellicano and any of you who have followed politics and/or Hollywood know about Tony Pellicano.  I bet these Arkansas Monkeys could tell you what happened to Miss Arkansas via Pellicano.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #553 12/3 - 12/4/2006
Post by: klaasend on December 04, 2006, 12:04:24 AM
Quote from: "Dana"
Quote from: "Tylergal"
Quote from: "Angiex911dsptchr"
Ty San and Jackie~!!!!!!!!!  :)

Oh gee SAN.. one damn typo and you are gonna apologize  ROFL
Imagine if I typed it :shock:   :wink:  to my piezon! :)


Oh, Angie.  When you have done the transcript, you did not make any errors.  You did not make errors with your recipes.  You just really get focused when you know it is important, (we all do that)!



well folks im sure it will be a very interesting week ahead, lets hope for some positive news for the good guys :-)

Dana - it's about time for the good guys to get a break don't you think?

I was surprised at the Lineup tonight.  I really didn't think she'd do much on the case, maybe a snippet about the Carlo thing.  Was great to see Beth in the studio, De Vries and Jossy on the phone.  Not so great to hear that loser of an attorney Joe T.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #553 12/3 - 12/4/2006
Post by: Tylergal on December 04, 2006, 12:06:22 AM
http://sinhablar.com/


Title: Lively Case Discussion #553 12/3 - 12/4/2006
Post by: San on December 04, 2006, 12:08:05 AM
Quote from: "klaasend"
Quote from: "Dana"

well folks im sure it will be a very interesting week ahead, lets hope for some positive news for the good guys :-)

Dana - it's about time for the good guys to get a break don't you think?

I was surprised at the Lineup tonight.  I really didn't think she'd do much on the case, maybe a snippet about the Carlo thing.  Was great to see Beth in the studio, De Vries and Jossy on the phone.  Not so great to hear that loser of an attorney Joe T.

I think Kimberly Guilfoyle did a great job tonight.  She asked good questions and when they were answering her you could see the serious look on her face.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #553 12/3 - 12/4/2006
Post by: klaasend on December 04, 2006, 12:08:32 AM
Quote from: "Anna"
.
Anone still up when the Fox report replays, listen and see if you can hear any more or tell any more of what Joe T is saying after his voice reaches that pitch only dogs can usually hear.

I will try, too.


(http://i15.photobucket.com/albums/a360/AnnaBlueSkies/Greetings/Holidays%20and%20BD/thATTB10.gif)


 :lol:  :lol:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #553 12/3 - 12/4/2006
Post by: klaasend on December 04, 2006, 12:09:23 AM
Quote from: "San"
Quote from: "klaasend"
Quote from: "Dana"

well folks im sure it will be a very interesting week ahead, lets hope for some positive news for the good guys :-)

Dana - it's about time for the good guys to get a break don't you think?

I was surprised at the Lineup tonight.  I really didn't think she'd do much on the case, maybe a snippet about the Carlo thing.  Was great to see Beth in the studio, De Vries and Jossy on the phone.  Not so great to hear that loser of an attorney Joe T.

I think Kimberly Guilfoyle did a great job tonight.  She asked good questions and when they were answering her you could see the serious look on her face.


Me too San.  Quite frankly, I think she was shocked at Joe's behaviour.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #553 12/3 - 12/4/2006
Post by: LilPuma on December 04, 2006, 12:11:17 AM
Quote from: "klaasend"

Me too San.  Quite frankly, I think she was shocked at Joe's behaviour.


She did take his side against Jossy though.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #553 12/3 - 12/4/2006
Post by: Angiex911dsptchr on December 04, 2006, 12:12:00 AM
Quote from: "Tylergal"
Quote from: "Angiex911dsptchr"
Ty San and Jackie~!!!!!!!!!  :)

Oh gee SAN.. one damn typo and you are gonna apologize  ROFL
Imagine if I typed it :shock:   :wink:  to my piezon! :)


Oh, Angie.  When you have done the transcript, you did not make any errors.  You did not make errors with your recipes.  You just really get focused when you know it is important, (we all do that)!


  LOL~!!  TY Tyler.. you are far too kind!
May not have typod with recipes.. but left an ingrediant out of one of them.. LMAO  :shock:  (but posted what it was long long ago :wink:
Hope you are feeling well!!  That goes to all of our other monkey folks that are ill.. Peaches.. Sunfreak.. Mere.. etc   Keeping Mrs Reds father in my prayers along with you all.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #553 12/3 - 12/4/2006
Post by: Tylergal on December 04, 2006, 12:12:35 AM
Quote from: "LilPuma"
Quote from: "klaasend"

Me too San.  Quite frankly, I think she was shocked at Joe's behaviour.


She did take his side against Jossy though.


Don't ever forget she is still beholden to that gang from Court TV.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #553 12/3 - 12/4/2006
Post by: klaasend on December 04, 2006, 12:13:20 AM
Quote from: "LilPuma"
Quote from: "klaasend"

Me too San.  Quite frankly, I think she was shocked at Joe's behaviour.


She did take his side against Jossy though.

I didn't think so.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #553 12/3 - 12/4/2006
Post by: Angiex911dsptchr on December 04, 2006, 12:13:22 AM
Quote from: "Dana"
Quote from: "Tylergal"
Quote from: "Angiex911dsptchr"
Ty San and Jackie~!!!!!!!!!  :)

Oh gee SAN.. one damn typo and you are gonna apologize  ROFL
Imagine if I typed it :shock:   :wink:  to my piezon! :)


Oh, Angie.  When you have done the transcript, you did not make any errors.  You did not make errors with your recipes.  You just really get focused when you know it is important, (we all do that)!



well folks im sure it will be a very interesting week ahead, lets hope for some positive news for the good guys :-)


Amen to that  Dana~!!!!!!!!


Title: Lively Case Discussion #553 12/3 - 12/4/2006
Post by: Sue on December 04, 2006, 12:13:26 AM


I will be watching at 10 Pm my time  I try to catch what i can
Im so excited i cant wait to hear him crap himself


Title: Lively Case Discussion #553 12/3 - 12/4/2006
Post by: Tylergal on December 04, 2006, 12:13:37 AM
Yes, I agree with you, Angie,and I am more than concerned about our Georgia Peach.

Wonder if None has gotten her cookies all done yet?


Title: Lively Case Discussion #553 12/3 - 12/4/2006
Post by: crazybabyborg on December 04, 2006, 12:14:37 AM
San, thank you for the transcript! I wasn't here for the beginning and it's a tremendous job and much appreciated!


Title: Lively Case Discussion #553 12/3 - 12/4/2006
Post by: Tylergal on December 04, 2006, 12:14:50 AM
FOR DANA

(http://bestsmileys.com/hat/1.gif)


Title: Lively Case Discussion #553 12/3 - 12/4/2006
Post by: LilPuma on December 04, 2006, 12:17:41 AM
For Jossy and Peter:  

(http://i91.photobucket.com/albums/k304/LilPuma04/cowboysmiley.gif)


Title: Lively Case Discussion #553 12/3 - 12/4/2006
Post by: Angiex911dsptchr on December 04, 2006, 12:18:50 AM
Quote from: "Tylergal"
Yes, I agree with you, Angie,and I am more than concerned about our Georgia Peach.

Wonder if None has gotten her cookies all done yet?


 I havnt heard from my sistah all evening.. she emailed me this morning and said she may not be online much coming up due to her baking.
has a big order she needs to get done for tomorrow  God love'er.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #553 12/3 - 12/4/2006
Post by: Sue on December 04, 2006, 12:18:54 AM

I bet Peter would have gotten a kick out that show


Title: Lively Case Discussion #553 12/3 - 12/4/2006
Post by: LilPuma on December 04, 2006, 12:20:15 AM
What's the name of Guido's attorney in The Netherlands?  I can't even find the who's who thread.   :?


Title: Lively Case Discussion #553 12/3 - 12/4/2006
Post by: San on December 04, 2006, 12:21:16 AM
Quote from: "LilPuma"
What's the name of Guido's attorney in The Netherlands?  I can't even find the who's who thread.   :?

I think his last name is Sponge.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #553 12/3 - 12/4/2006
Post by: klaasend on December 04, 2006, 12:26:03 AM
CBB - could you do me a favor and replace your signature line with this one I made a little smaller?  The current size blows the margin a bit every time you post.  TIA

(http://i37.photobucket.com/albums/e82/klaasend2/cbbsigline.gif)

http://i37.photobucket.com/albums/e82/klaasend2/cbbsigline.gif

You can use it X2 like you have your current one  :wink:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #553 12/3 - 12/4/2006
Post by: crazymom on December 04, 2006, 12:35:25 AM
Hey Monkeys!! Busy weekend here preparing for Christmas.  I have posted a new article concerning Missouri DSS not being allowed to protect the children, only make recommendations.  


Any new news regarding the Natalee case since Friday?  I am going to try and catch up now!


Title: Lively Case Discussion #553 12/3 - 12/4/2006
Post by: Angiex911dsptchr on December 04, 2006, 12:39:30 AM
Quote from: "crazymom"
Hey Monkeys!! Busy weekend here preparing for Christmas.  I have posted a new article concerning Missouri DSS not being allowed to protect the children, only make recommendations.  


Any new news regarding the Natalee case since Friday?  I am going to try and catch up now!


 HI Crazy~!! :)

Go back a few pages.. San and Jackie posted transcripts of tonights Line Up on FOX~!!!!  :)    It was a god show. Beth was on.. and then Joe T called in and had a hissy fit.. it was amusing as hell.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #553 12/3 - 12/4/2006
Post by: crazybabyborg on December 04, 2006, 12:43:24 AM
Quote from: "klaasend"
CBB - could you do me a favor and replace your signature line with this one I made a little smaller?  The current size blows the margin a bit every time you post.  TIA

(http://i37.photobucket.com/albums/e82/klaasend2/cbbsigline.gif)

http://i37.photobucket.com/albums/e82/klaasend2/cbbsigline.gif

You can use it X2 like you have your current one  :wink:


I just got back on here and will do it right now...sorry!!!


Title: Lively Case Discussion #553 12/3 - 12/4/2006
Post by: crazybabyborg on December 04, 2006, 12:46:57 AM
All better? Thanks Klaas, sorry for the delay! I was making tea and getting comfy to watch the Line Up repeat.  :oops:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #553 12/3 - 12/4/2006
Post by: LilPuma on December 04, 2006, 12:47:49 AM
Quote from: "San"
Quote from: "LilPuma"
What's the name of Guido's attorney in The Netherlands?  I can't even find the who's who thread.   :?

I think his last name is Sponge.


Thanks.  It's Gerard Spong.  I did a quick google to see what popped up in terms of cases and clients.  I wanted to see if there are any overlaps or coincidences or oddities.   Other than a couple of arsonists, everything else is Holloway!  Maybe tomorrow I'll be able to google past page 4.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #553 12/3 - 12/4/2006
Post by: LilPuma on December 04, 2006, 12:49:45 AM
Quote from: "crazybabyborg"
All better? Thanks Klaas, sorry for the delay! I was making tea and getting comfy to watch the Line Up repeat.  :oops:


I'm with you, crazybaby!  Night Monkeys.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #553 12/3 - 12/4/2006
Post by: klaasend on December 04, 2006, 12:49:47 AM
I just deleted my silly incorrect post in case anyone is wondering.  I was having a blonde moment  :wink:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #553 12/3 - 12/4/2006
Post by: klaasend on December 04, 2006, 12:50:46 AM
Nite Lilpuma!


Title: Lively Case Discussion #553 12/3 - 12/4/2006
Post by: Angiex911dsptchr on December 04, 2006, 12:52:01 AM
Quote from: "klaasend"
I just deleted my silly incorrect post in case anyone is wondering.  I was having a blonde moment  :wink:


  ROFL which post?  (mail back at yah :) )


Title: Lively Case Discussion #553 12/3 - 12/4/2006
Post by: crazybabyborg on December 04, 2006, 12:56:41 AM
Jossy: I'm quoting him ( Dompig) verbatum........


Title: Lively Case Discussion #553 12/3 - 12/4/2006
Post by: crazymom on December 04, 2006, 01:00:21 AM
Quote from: "Angiex911dsptchr"

 HI Crazy~!! :)

Go back a few pages.. San and Jackie posted transcripts of tonights Line Up on FOX~!!!!  :)    It was a god show. Beth was on.. and then Joe T called in and had a hissy fit.. it was amusing as hell.


Thanks Angie,
I went back and read the transcript (thanks you great monkeys) but I was unable to find the part where Taco called in.  Can you tell me what page, please!!!


Title: Lively Case Discussion #553 12/3 - 12/4/2006
Post by: crazybabyborg on December 04, 2006, 01:02:33 AM
If the beach trip never happened, then it pinpoints a little closer exactly when and what Paulus knew. Somebody, please refresh my memory? When was it that Paulus was supposed to be picking Joran up?


Title: Lively Case Discussion #553 12/3 - 12/4/2006
Post by: Sue on December 04, 2006, 01:03:13 AM


It was interesting to see the video of Carlos shifting around in his seat
But Yeah Joe that meeting never took place    HA laugh is on you Joe


Title: Lively Case Discussion #553 12/3 - 12/4/2006
Post by: Angiex911dsptchr on December 04, 2006, 01:05:56 AM
Quote from: "crazymom"
Quote from: "Angiex911dsptchr"

 HI Crazy~!! :)

Go back a few pages.. San and Jackie posted transcripts of tonights Line Up on FOX~!!!!  :)    It was a god show. Beth was on.. and then Joe T called in and had a hissy fit.. it was amusing as hell.


Thanks Angie,
I went back and read the transcript (thanks you great monkeys) but I was unable to find the part where Taco called in.  Can you tell me what page, please!!!


 Heli posted this on RU.. I skipped over the rest of it since you read what San and Jackie had posted..

Kim:

Joran's US attorney has joined us on the telephone, welcome Joe


Joe

I've been watching a bunch of fiction and fantasy on your show, misstatements. I don't pay any attention to Jossy, he's made this a joke, he's fabricated false evidence, he's someone who is on the verge of being senile. He has zero credibility.

Let's get back to what you 're talking about, Antonio Carlo didn't say anything to the prosecutor that remotely resembles that Joran had any involvemnt in Natalee's disappearance. Carlo said nothing of the sort, he represents Joran. He was in court last thursday with Karin discussing the closing of this case once and for all. Karin is not bringing this to any court. Antonio never said any such thing and him losing his law license is just preposterous.

People misstate truth and fact, starting with Dr Phil's doctored tape,the false confessions from the jail, including the false affidavit submitted by Beth Twitty in the New York civil case saying Joran was a sexual predator. The person gave her affidavit that it was totally false, she never said that.

So when we start talking about evidence, let's not talk about fantasy like I've heard tonight.

Kim

I did ask Jossy why he hasn't come with that tape, he's going to produce it when the case goes to trial, he will turn it over only then

Joe:

Before the case goes to trial? This guy is a buffoon, he's fabricated witnesses like thejogger, the pipe man, he's lead the police on more wild goose chases

There's no evidence to support anything, when they get Joran to court, which will never happen, then we'll have an intelligent conversation

Kim:

Well okay Joe, I just think whoever did this should be put away and punished.


  CRAZY.. it was Joes voice. he was pissed.. very high pitched at the end like he got kicked in the.. BOYS!  lol  :wink:  could hardly undertand what he was saying!


Title: Lively Case Discussion #553 12/3 - 12/4/2006
Post by: justinsmama on December 04, 2006, 01:16:26 AM
Quote from: "San"
Quote from: "San"
Jossy said it has been definately been confirmed that they molested the girl while she was going in and out of consciousness.

Jossy has a tape and he has many copies of it.  He usually makes tapes of people he doesn't trust.  If it is not rape, they strangled her and they did a lot of things to her.  He told Jossy many other things.  He said he will present it to the prosecutor when the case goes to court.


Correction after listening to this again I realized I heard the wrong word.  SORRY ABOUT THAT FOLKS.


Well, there ya go. Broken whatchmacallit in the neck was the chit that would be found.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #553 12/3 - 12/4/2006
Post by: crazymom on December 04, 2006, 01:24:15 AM
Leave it to Joe to make an a$$ of himself. LOL.  I hope in the future he has to eat every squeaky word he has ever said!!!


Title: Lively Case Discussion #553 12/3 - 12/4/2006
Post by: Sue on December 04, 2006, 01:29:09 AM

this is all fiction and fantasy according to Joe
He claims jossy is a bafoon and senile and lead teh police on a wild
goose chase.. he said beth lied in document in the civil suit about joran being  a sexual predator and that there witness told Joe basically that nothing happen with joran.. He again says he has been in contact with carlos several times and this meeting never took place and in fact
Carlos and Karin were in court together to have joran released as a suspect ...


Title: Lively Case Discussion #553 12/3 - 12/4/2006
Post by: Carnut on December 04, 2006, 01:29:13 AM
Quote from: "justinsmama"
Quote from: "San"
Quote from: "San"
Jossy said it has been definately been confirmed that they molested the girl while she was going in and out of consciousness.

Jossy has a tape and he has many copies of it.  He usually makes tapes of people he doesn't trust.  If it is not rape, they strangled her and they did a lot of things to her.  He told Jossy many other things.  He said he will present it to the prosecutor when the case goes to court.


Correction after listening to this again I realized I heard the wrong word.  SORRY ABOUT THAT FOLKS.


Well, there ya go. Broken whatchmacallit in the neck was the chit that would be found.


Sorry, I think ya had it right the first time.

Comes right out of the statements given.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #553 12/3 - 12/4/2006
Post by: Angiex911dsptchr on December 04, 2006, 01:29:32 AM
Quote from: "Sue"


It was interesting to see the video of Carlos shifting around in his seat
But Yeah Joe that meeting never took place    HA laugh is on you Joe


 :)

 Like your avi Sue!!


Title: Lively Case Discussion #553 12/3 - 12/4/2006
Post by: Dana on December 04, 2006, 01:30:23 AM
Quote from: "crazymom"
Leave it to Joe to make an a$$ of himself. LOL.  I hope in the future he has to eat every squeaky word he has ever said!!!



well there was one buffoon on the lineup tonight and it wasnt jossy, it was puberty boy !!
lol


Title: Lively Case Discussion #553 12/3 - 12/4/2006
Post by: Carnut on December 04, 2006, 01:31:00 AM
Quote from: "Sue"

this is all fiction and fantasy according to Joe
He claims jossy is a bafoon and senile and lead teh police on a wild
goose chase.. he said beth lied in document in the civil suit about joran being  a sexual predator and that there witness told Joe basically that nothing happen with joran.. He again says he has been in contact with carlos several times and this meeting never took place and in fact
Carlos and Karin were in court together to have joran released as a suspect ...


Well they were in court on the 30th to do that, but KJ was supposedly asking for 3 more months to investigate.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #553 12/3 - 12/4/2006
Post by: Sue on December 04, 2006, 01:31:07 AM


Well I think it is time Jossy put this tape on National Tv


Title: Lively Case Discussion #553 12/3 - 12/4/2006
Post by: Angiex911dsptchr on December 04, 2006, 01:32:01 AM
Quote from: "Dana"
Quote from: "crazymom"
Leave it to Joe to make an a$$ of himself. LOL.  I hope in the future he has to eat every squeaky word he has ever said!!!



well there was one buffoon on the lineup tonight and it wasnt jossy, it was puberty boy !!
lol


  ROFL~!  :) :) :)


Title: Lively Case Discussion #553 12/3 - 12/4/2006
Post by: Sue on December 04, 2006, 01:32:22 AM
Quote from: "Carnut"
Quote from: "Sue"

this is all fiction and fantasy according to Joe
He claims jossy is a bafoon and senile and lead teh police on a wild
goose chase.. he said beth lied in document in the civil suit about joran being  a sexual predator and that there witness told Joe basically that nothing happen with joran.. He again says he has been in contact with carlos several times and this meeting never took place and in fact
Carlos and Karin were in court together to have joran released as a suspect ...


Well they were in court on the 30th to do that, but KJ was supposedly asking for 3 more months to investigate.


Well if you listen to teh way Joe tells it .. It was carlos and karin in court togther to get joran released... Joe doesnt even mention karin asking for 3 more months


Title: Lively Case Discussion #553 12/3 - 12/4/2006
Post by: Tylergal on December 04, 2006, 01:32:31 AM
Yes, old crazy Joe said Jossy was "bordering on senile, " and later called him a "baffoon," said that Dompig was fired because he went on American TV and said that he did not believe that J2K killed Natalee, that she killed herself, took drugs, etc., etc., and he was getting loud, so Kimberly just kind of thanked him anyway.  I think he must have been drunk.  I don't think any sober person would get on TV and act like that, not even tag-team wrestlers.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #553 12/3 - 12/4/2006
Post by: LilPuma on December 04, 2006, 01:34:09 AM
Just watched the replay of The Lineup and want to make a few points.  

1.  JoeT said, as posted in the transcript above, that Carlo was in court with KJ to discuss the closing of this case ONCE AND FOR ALL.  

2.  Why oh why would Jossy Mansur be expected to give the Prosecutor a tape of the police investigator's statements about the case?  Wouldn't the prosecutor be in a position to know what the police investigator knows or has?  It's just absurd; yet Kimberly and JoeT made a fuss over it.  

3.  Doctored Dr. Phil tapes.  As I posted earlier, if that's the case, someone would have filed suit.  No brainer.  

Fiction and fantasies.  The new title of the thread for Joran's statements.  What a capitalist buffoon you are, JoeT.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #553 12/3 - 12/4/2006
Post by: Carnut on December 04, 2006, 01:35:22 AM
Quote from: "Sue"
Quote from: "Carnut"
Quote from: "Sue"

this is all fiction and fantasy according to Joe
He claims jossy is a bafoon and senile and lead teh police on a wild
goose chase.. he said beth lied in document in the civil suit about joran being  a sexual predator and that there witness told Joe basically that nothing happen with joran.. He again says he has been in contact with carlos several times and this meeting never took place and in fact
Carlos and Karin were in court together to have joran released as a suspect ...


Well they were in court on the 30th to do that, but KJ was supposedly asking for 3 more months to investigate.


Well if you listen to teh way Joe tells it .. It was carlos and karin in court togther to get joran released... Joe doesnt even mention karin asking for 3 more months


Heh, heh, isn't that the way mouthpieces are paid to talk?


Title: Lively Case Discussion #553 12/3 - 12/4/2006
Post by: Tylergal on December 04, 2006, 01:35:50 AM
Oh, yes, and he said the documents that Beth submitted in New York were lies, the reason the case was thrown out.  Now we all know who the liar is here, it's Joe.  That was not the reason the case was thrown out.  After rewatching this, I think I know why John Q Kelly let Beth go on by herself.  He was baiting old Crazy Joe.  I would say Beth has grounds for a law suit right there when he accuses her on TV of submitting false documents to a court.  Since he is now "Joran's attorney for all times, everywhere," I would think Beth would not only be able to sue Joe but Aruba, KJ, etc., as well.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #553 12/3 - 12/4/2006
Post by: LilPuma on December 04, 2006, 01:36:22 AM
Quote from: "Tylergal"
Yes, old crazy Joe said Jossy was "bordering on senile, " and later called him a "baffoon," said that Dompig was fired because he went on American TV and said that he did not believe that J2K killed Natalee, that she killed herself, took drugs, etc., etc., and he was getting loud, so Kimberly just kind of thanked him anyway.  I think he must have been drunk.  I don't think any sober person would get on TV and act like that, not even tag-team wrestlers.


If he's still in Italy, it's about 6 hours later, so he might have been in his Power Rangers jammies and angry that he had to get up to listen to people tell the world that his client is guilty.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #553 12/3 - 12/4/2006
Post by: Angiex911dsptchr on December 04, 2006, 01:37:55 AM
Quote from: "LilPuma"
Just watched the replay of The Lineup and want to make a few points.  

1.  JoeT said, as posted in the transcript above, that Carlo was in court with KJ to discuss the closing of this case ONCE AND FOR ALL.  

2.  Why oh why would Jossy Mansur be expected to give the Prosecutor a tape of the police investigator's statements about the case?  Wouldn't the prosecutor be in a position to know what the police investigator knows or has?  It's just absurd; yet Kimberly and JoeT made a fuss over it.  

3.  Doctored Dr. Phil tapes.  As I posted earlier, if that's the case, someone would have filed suit.  No brainer.  

Fiction and fantasies.  The new title of the thread for Joran's statements.  What a capitalist buffoon you are, JoeT.


 Makes me wonder if Joran confessed to Carlo and Carlo told KJ?


Title: Lively Case Discussion #553 12/3 - 12/4/2006
Post by: Angiex911dsptchr on December 04, 2006, 01:39:57 AM
Quote from: "LilPuma"
Quote from: "Tylergal"
Yes, old crazy Joe said Jossy was "bordering on senile, " and later called him a "baffoon," said that Dompig was fired because he went on American TV and said that he did not believe that J2K killed Natalee, that she killed herself, took drugs, etc., etc., and he was getting loud, so Kimberly just kind of thanked him anyway.  I think he must have been drunk.  I don't think any sober person would get on TV and act like that, not even tag-team wrestlers.


If he's still in Italy, it's about 6 hours later, so he might have been in his Power Rangers jammies and angry that he had to get up to listen to people tell the world that his client is guilty.


  Power ranger jamnies? ROFL  too funny Puma!! maybe he wears underoos too!!   :wink:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #553 12/3 - 12/4/2006
Post by: Sue on December 04, 2006, 01:42:22 AM
Quote from: "Carnut"
Quote from: "Sue"
Quote from: "Carnut"
Quote from: "Sue"

this is all fiction and fantasy according to Joe
He claims jossy is a bafoon and senile and lead teh police on a wild
goose chase.. he said beth lied in document in the civil suit about joran being  a sexual predator and that there witness told Joe basically that nothing happen with joran.. He again says he has been in contact with carlos several times and this meeting never took place and in fact
Carlos and Karin were in court together to have joran released as a suspect ...


Well they were in court on the 30th to do that, but KJ was supposedly asking for 3 more months to investigate.


Well if you listen to teh way Joe tells it .. It was carlos and karin in court togther to get joran released... Joe doesnt even mention karin asking for 3 more months


Heh, heh, isn't that the way mouthpieces are paid to talk?


who's mouth piece is he ??? is he still on Sloot payroll


Title: Lively Case Discussion #553 12/3 - 12/4/2006
Post by: LilPuma on December 04, 2006, 01:44:05 AM
Quote from: "Tylergal"
Oh, yes, and he said the documents that Beth submitted in New York were lies, the reason the case was thrown out.  Now we all know who the liar is here, it's Joe.  That was not the reason the case was thrown out.  After rewatching this, I think I know why John Q Kelly let Beth go on by herself.  He was baiting old Crazy Joe.  I would say Beth has grounds for a law suit right there when he accuses her on TV of submitting false documents to a court.  Since he is now "Joran's attorney for all times, everywhere," I would think Beth would not only be able to sue Joe but Aruba, KJ, etc., as well.


I think both Jossy and Beth could sue JoeT.  I hope they do.  Maybe Dr. Phil and Skeeters could sue him and Aruba also.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #553 12/3 - 12/4/2006
Post by: crazybabyborg on December 04, 2006, 01:44:34 AM
I wouldn't think that Joran confessed to Carlo. I would think that Paulus discussed strategy with Carlo thinking he had a comrade's confidence and knowing he couldn't divulge what was said.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #553 12/3 - 12/4/2006
Post by: LilPuma on December 04, 2006, 01:46:34 AM
Quote from: "Angiex911dsptchr"
Quote from: "LilPuma"
Just watched the replay of The Lineup and want to make a few points.  

1.  JoeT said, as posted in the transcript above, that Carlo was in court with KJ to discuss the closing of this case ONCE AND FOR ALL.  

2.  Why oh why would Jossy Mansur be expected to give the Prosecutor a tape of the police investigator's statements about the case?  Wouldn't the prosecutor be in a position to know what the police investigator knows or has?  It's just absurd; yet Kimberly and JoeT made a fuss over it.  

3.  Doctored Dr. Phil tapes.  As I posted earlier, if that's the case, someone would have filed suit.  No brainer.  

Fiction and fantasies.  The new title of the thread for Joran's statements.  What a capitalist buffoon you are, JoeT.


 Makes me wonder if Joran confessed to Carlo and Carlo told KJ?


So who orchestrated the retraction of the story about a confession?  Was this confession presented to the Judge?


Title: Lively Case Discussion #553 12/3 - 12/4/2006
Post by: Angiex911dsptchr on December 04, 2006, 01:46:50 AM
Quote from: "crazybabyborg"
I wouldn't think that Joran confessed to Carlo. I would think that Paulus discussed strategy with Carlo thinking he had a comrade's confidence and knowing he couldn't divulge what was said.


  Makes sense CBB  ..


Title: Lively Case Discussion #553 12/3 - 12/4/2006
Post by: crazybabyborg on December 04, 2006, 01:47:54 AM
Early on, Joran was scared enough to do what Daddy said, and Carlo's comments may very well have been concluded by discussions of how to handle some of the early comments to police that ended up with "no record". I would bet the farm that there was an early strategy for how to handle it if the body were found as well


Title: Lively Case Discussion #553 12/3 - 12/4/2006
Post by: Carnut on December 04, 2006, 01:48:05 AM
Quote from: "Sue"
Quote from: "Carnut"
Quote from: "Sue"
Quote from: "Carnut"
Quote from: "Sue"

this is all fiction and fantasy according to Joe
He claims jossy is a bafoon and senile and lead teh police on a wild
goose chase.. he said beth lied in document in the civil suit about joran being  a sexual predator and that there witness told Joe basically that nothing happen with joran.. He again says he has been in contact with carlos several times and this meeting never took place and in fact
Carlos and Karin were in court together to have joran released as a suspect ...


Well they were in court on the 30th to do that, but KJ was supposedly asking for 3 more months to investigate.


Well if you listen to teh way Joe tells it .. It was carlos and karin in court togther to get joran released... Joe doesnt even mention karin asking for 3 more months


Heh, heh, isn't that the way mouthpieces are paid to talk?


who's mouth piece is he ??? is he still on Sloot payroll


Not sure if he was ever on the Sloot payroll, he obviously is on someone's big bucks payroll in aruba.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #553 12/3 - 12/4/2006
Post by: Anna on December 04, 2006, 01:48:25 AM
Evidently Crazy Joe just called in without being asked to.  Nothing was said about his being on the program until suddenly there he was screaming in the phone, like it was not planned or anticipated??

He has nothing to do with Aruba, only NY so why is he so hysterical about all this?  Oh, for one thing, he promied the sloots to make people stop saying "bad things" (read the truth) about his delinquent client.  Guess he hates it when he is powerless to do that.  

He can't control what people say or what people think or what people know and he might as well get over it.

 :roll:
(http://i15.photobucket.com/albums/a360/AnnaBlueSkies/Greetings/Holidays%20and%20BD/4d66teq_th.gif)(http://i15.photobucket.com/albums/a360/AnnaBlueSkies/Greetings/Holidays%20and%20BD/4d66teq_th.gif)(http://i15.photobucket.com/albums/a360/AnnaBlueSkies/Greetings/Holidays%20and%20BD/4d66teq_th.gif)(http://i15.photobucket.com/albums/a360/AnnaBlueSkies/Greetings/Holidays%20and%20BD/4d66teq_th.gif)


Title: Lively Case Discussion #553 12/3 - 12/4/2006
Post by: Angiex911dsptchr on December 04, 2006, 01:49:47 AM
Quote from: "LilPuma"
Quote from: "Angiex911dsptchr"
Quote from: "LilPuma"
Just watched the replay of The Lineup and want to make a few points.  

1.  JoeT said, as posted in the transcript above, that Carlo was in court with KJ to discuss the closing of this case ONCE AND FOR ALL.  

2.  Why oh why would Jossy Mansur be expected to give the Prosecutor a tape of the police investigator's statements about the case?  Wouldn't the prosecutor be in a position to know what the police investigator knows or has?  It's just absurd; yet Kimberly and JoeT made a fuss over it.  

3.  Doctored Dr. Phil tapes.  As I posted earlier, if that's the case, someone would have filed suit.  No brainer.  

Fiction and fantasies.  The new title of the thread for Joran's statements.  What a capitalist buffoon you are, JoeT.


 Makes me wonder if Joran confessed to Carlo and Carlo told KJ?


So who orchestrated the retraction of the story about a confession?  Was this confession presented to the Judge?


OMG its been so dang long.. IIRC it was  Rudy Croes who said there was a confession back on June 11th 2005.. it was announced on FOX.. then BOOM.. nothing.. no retraction. Thats been something thats always pissed me off til this day. :(


Title: Lively Case Discussion #553 12/3 - 12/4/2006
Post by: crazybabyborg on December 04, 2006, 01:50:04 AM
Quote from: "LilPuma"
Quote from: "Angiex911dsptchr"
Quote from: "LilPuma"
Just watched the replay of The Lineup and want to make a few points.  

1.  JoeT said, as posted in the transcript above, that Carlo was in court with KJ to discuss the closing of this case ONCE AND FOR ALL.  

2.  Why oh why would Jossy Mansur be expected to give the Prosecutor a tape of the police investigator's statements about the case?  Wouldn't the prosecutor be in a position to know what the police investigator knows or has?  It's just absurd; yet Kimberly and JoeT made a fuss over it.  

3.  Doctored Dr. Phil tapes.  As I posted earlier, if that's the case, someone would have filed suit.  No brainer.  

Fiction and fantasies.  The new title of the thread for Joran's statements.  What a capitalist buffoon you are, JoeT.


 Makes me wonder if Joran confessed to Carlo and Carlo told KJ?


So who orchestrated the retraction of the story about a confession?  Was this confession presented to the Judge?


Now, that's a good question! I would say we are better qualified to answer that than before we knew who was able to interfere with a search warrant.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #553 12/3 - 12/4/2006
Post by: Angiex911dsptchr on December 04, 2006, 01:53:09 AM
oops sorry Puma..  I think I misunderstood your ?


Title: Lively Case Discussion #553 12/3 - 12/4/2006
Post by: Anna on December 04, 2006, 01:53:16 AM
Quote from: "Sue"
[
Well if you listen to teh way Joe tells it .. It was carlos and karin in court togther to get joran released... Joe doesnt even mention karin asking for 3 more months



Yes, he did as though KJ wants Joran released as badly as he does.  Well, maybe she does, after all.   :evil: She sure hasn't done much to bring him to trial but doesn't he realize that even if released, Joran can just be brought right back in if any evidence has excaped destruction.

If early on it was Paulus talking to Carlo, that part might not be confidential, not sure if relatives of the client are included in the attorney client confidence privilege, etc.  Maybe they are allowed to tell what relatives say.

.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #553 12/3 - 12/4/2006
Post by: LilPuma on December 04, 2006, 01:55:09 AM
Quote from: "Anna"
Evidently Crazy Joe just called in without being asked to.  Nothing was said about his being on the program until suddenly there he was screaming in the phone, like it was not planned or anticipated??

He has nothing to do with Aruba, only NY so why is he so hysterical about all this?  Oh, for one thing, he promied the sloots to make people stop saying "bad things" (read the truth) about his delinquent client.  Guess he hates it when he is powerless to do that.  

He can't control what people say or what people think or what people know and he might as well get over it.

 :roll:


I think I posted earlier that it was always my opinion that the meeting with JoeT was planned before the van der Sloots got to NY and were served.  I think he was hired to quash the statements being made about Joran and Paulus by discrediting them and threatening to sue people.  Apparently he is still working on that.  The reason I suspect that C&C and the Excelsior are putting up money is obvious - if Joran is found guilty, they are both culpable since Joran should NOT have been in their establishments and if he hadn't been, Natalee would be alive.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #553 12/3 - 12/4/2006
Post by: Anna on December 04, 2006, 01:57:39 AM
Carnut,
Please pay special attention to Jossy's description of Joran and Guido's relationship and how it was more than just friendship.  What do you think he means by all that he said about this?  

At least Guido thinks it was something special evidently from the statement he has given in this regard.  Jossy says it is in the record.

.

(http://i15.photobucket.com/albums/a360/AnnaBlueSkies/Greetings/Holidays%20and%20BD/thmerryxmass.jpg)


Title: Lively Case Discussion #553 12/3 - 12/4/2006
Post by: LilPuma on December 04, 2006, 02:01:58 AM
Quote from: "Angiex911dsptchr"
oops sorry Puma..  I think I misunderstood your ?


Not really.  It's all about the events of the same weekend.  Van der Straaten is removed from the case, Dompig and Croes announce the confession and the suspects leading them to the remains, and then Monday morning van der Straaten is back on the case and statements about confessions and bodies are gone.  If that's correct, then I think we have our answer.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #553 12/3 - 12/4/2006
Post by: Carnut on December 04, 2006, 02:03:01 AM
Quote from: "Anna"
Carnut,
Please pay special attention to Jossy's description of Joran and Guido's relationship and how it was more than just friendship.  What do you think he means by all that he said about this?  

At least Guido thinks it was something special evidently from the statement he has given in this regard.  Jossy says it is in the record.

.

(http://i15.photobucket.com/albums/a360/AnnaBlueSkies/Greetings/Holidays%20and%20BD/thmerryxmass.jpg)


I still stand my interpretation of the 'relationship' rumor.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #553 12/3 - 12/4/2006
Post by: crazybabyborg on December 04, 2006, 02:03:06 AM
Guys, I'm getting up early, so I had best turn in. Have a wonderful night!


Title: Lively Case Discussion #553 12/3 - 12/4/2006
Post by: LilPuma on December 04, 2006, 02:04:51 AM
Quote from: "crazybabyborg"
Guys, I'm getting up early, so I had best turn in. Have a wonderful night!


Looking at cbb's post with her smaller sig line pic, I better go to bed too.  I'm seeing double!   :shock:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #553 12/3 - 12/4/2006
Post by: Angiex911dsptchr on December 04, 2006, 02:08:37 AM
Quote from: "Carnut"
Quote from: "Anna"
Carnut,
Please pay special attention to Jossy's description of Joran and Guido's relationship and how it was more than just friendship.  What do you think he means by all that he said about this?  

At least Guido thinks it was something special evidently from the statement he has given in this regard.  Jossy says it is in the record.

.

(http://i15.photobucket.com/albums/a360/AnnaBlueSkies/Greetings/Holidays%20and%20BD/thmerryxmass.jpg)


I still stand my interpretation of the 'relationship' rumor.


 Carnut?   you think they are or arnt .. ummm. lovers?


Title: Lively Case Discussion #553 12/3 - 12/4/2006
Post by: Carnut on December 04, 2006, 02:09:38 AM
Again, I think there's alot of misunderstanding here about what is said down there.

I think it's pretty clear that Jossy telling what Dompig said about they have a case because the boys did kidnap and do something sexual with Nat, then he goes on to say because the boys were driving and in the car while things were being done to Nat.

It's just a simple repeat of what we've read in the statements.

It's just that folks in aruba seem to say things enough differently with regard to tense, gender, and descriptives that they come out different here with our interpretations.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #553 12/3 - 12/4/2006
Post by: Carnut on December 04, 2006, 02:10:34 AM
Quote from: "Angiex911dsptchr"
Quote from: "Carnut"
Quote from: "Anna"
Carnut,
Please pay special attention to Jossy's description of Joran and Guido's relationship and how it was more than just friendship.  What do you think he means by all that he said about this?  

At least Guido thinks it was something special evidently from the statement he has given in this regard.  Jossy says it is in the record.

.

(http://i15.photobucket.com/albums/a360/AnnaBlueSkies/Greetings/Holidays%20and%20BD/thmerryxmass.jpg)


I still stand my interpretation of the 'relationship' rumor.


 Carnut?   you think they are or arnt .. ummm. lovers?


No, I don't think that JVDS and Guido have ever had a Romantic Relationship.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #553 12/3 - 12/4/2006
Post by: Angiex911dsptchr on December 04, 2006, 02:11:44 AM
Night Puma and CBB  
 Oh crap.. before I forget and lose my hugging job Lalas gave me..
(http://i12.photobucket.com/albums/a206/Angiex911dsptchr/nemo.gif)  and to CP as well!!  :)


Title: Lively Case Discussion #553 12/3 - 12/4/2006
Post by: Carnut on December 04, 2006, 02:13:25 AM
I guess part of my reason to try to explain things the way I do is just my KISS, but also because, especially now because of the DeVries show, I don't want all the new Dutch types to come here and see everyone discussing things that are almost as off the wall as some of the things from RWV and RU.

Course it's really none of my business, but I just have a thing for reasonable credibility.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #553 12/3 - 12/4/2006
Post by: Angiex911dsptchr on December 04, 2006, 02:17:11 AM
Carnut.. I know of others  who feel the same as you do..
Do you think this is just a ruse? and using this for an excuse that they wouldnt go near a female?   See IMO I think Guido looks like hes a bit light in the loafers,. I know looks dont mean chit.. and I think about what None says about Dutchladys findings about the gay thingy  with Joran?
 I guess I am curious as to why you feel they arnt in a realtioinship together?


Title: Lively Case Discussion #553 12/3 - 12/4/2006
Post by: Anna on December 04, 2006, 02:23:37 AM
.
I seriously doubt that it was very romantic either but more sexual in nature.  Even Joran supporters are calling it just harmless sexual experimentation and don't deny it.  Yes, we might not understand a particular statement well but I do think Jossy would.

And Joe T did not list that among his litany of complaints either.
Maybe Guido will become jealous of being replaced by that little curly headed guy and spill the beans.

(http://i15.photobucket.com/albums/a360/AnnaBlueSkies/Greetings/Holidays%20and%20BD/thcreobear17fixed.jpg)
.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #553 12/3 - 12/4/2006
Post by: Angiex911dsptchr on December 04, 2006, 02:25:23 AM
Quote from: "Anna"
.
I seriously doubt that it was very romantic either but more sexual in nature.  Even Joran supporters are calling it just harmless sexual experimentation and don't deny it.  Yes, we might not understand a particular statement well but I do think Jossy would.

And Joe T did not list that among his litany of complaints either.
Maybe Guido will become jealous of being replaced by that little curly headed guy and spill the beans.

(http://i15.photobucket.com/albums/a360/AnnaBlueSkies/Greetings/Holidays%20and%20BD/thcreobear17fixed.jpg)
.


 :)  LOL


Title: Lively Case Discussion #553 12/3 - 12/4/2006
Post by: MisGivings on December 04, 2006, 02:25:48 AM
Quote from: "Jacqueline"
I have to say that phone call was damn entertaining.

What a tool.


************************************************************
OK, maybe I am just stupid, but what phone call are you talking about? I didn't hear one when watching the segment on The Lineup about the case, so when was it and what show was it on???


Title: Lively Case Discussion #553 12/3 - 12/4/2006
Post by: Carnut on December 04, 2006, 02:26:51 AM
Quote from: "Angiex911dsptchr"
Carnut.. I know of others  who feel the same as you do..
Do you think this is just a ruse? and using this for an excuse that they wouldnt go near a female?   See IMO I think Guido looks like hes a bit light in the loafers,. I know looks dont mean chit.. and I think about what None says about Dutchladys findings about the gay thingy  with Joran?
 I guess I am curious as to why you feel they arnt in a realtioinship together?


Well, I really don't know anymore about the 'facts' than you do, I just have my interpretation of what's been posted.

The original posts about the Guido statement and Jossy's answer on a question about that statement just don't lead me to interpret the responses as saying there was anything gay going on.

I still maintain it's a difference understanding what the word 'relationship' means and how it may have been intended by Guido or how it was recorded by the ALE. Again there's a couple of different languages involved and translations and probably some slang or colloquialisms in the way as well.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #553 12/3 - 12/4/2006
Post by: Carnut on December 04, 2006, 02:27:51 AM
Quote from: "Anna"
.
I seriously doubt that it was very romantic either but more sexual in nature.  Even Joran supporters are calling it just harmless sexual experimentation and don't deny it.  Yes, we might not understand a particular statement well but I do think Jossy would.

And Joe T did not list that among his litany of complaints either.
Maybe Guido will become jealous of being replaced by that little curly headed guy and spill the beans.

(http://i15.photobucket.com/albums/a360/AnnaBlueSkies/Greetings/Holidays%20and%20BD/thcreobear17fixed.jpg)
.


Heh, heh, I think we have problems understanding Jossy's version of aruban english.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #553 12/3 - 12/4/2006
Post by: justinsmama on December 04, 2006, 02:28:19 AM
Quote from: "MisGivings"
Quote from: "Jacqueline"
I have to say that phone call was damn entertaining.

What a tool.


************************************************************
OK, maybe I am just stupid, but what phone call are you talking about? I didn't hear one when watching the segment on The Lineup about the case, so when was it and what show was it on???


Joe T. called in on the Guiford (?) show and had a hissy fit over what Jossy revealed. It was fun! LOL!


Title: Lively Case Discussion #553 12/3 - 12/4/2006
Post by: Sue on December 04, 2006, 02:31:18 AM
Joe T made a complete ASS of himself
He would have held better credibility if he kept himself together
but he lost it


Title: Lively Case Discussion #553 12/3 - 12/4/2006
Post by: MisGivings on December 04, 2006, 02:31:49 AM
Quote from: "justinsmama"
Quote from: "MisGivings"
Quote from: "Jacqueline"
I have to say that phone call was damn entertaining.

What a tool.


************************************************************
OK, maybe I am just stupid, but what phone call are you talking about? I didn't hear one when watching the segment on The Lineup about the case, so when was it and what show was it on???


Joe T. called in on the Guiford (?) show and had a hissy fit over what Jossy revealed. It was fun! LOL!


************************************************************
OK, I watched the rerun of it and did not hear this. Was it cut out?


Title: Lively Case Discussion #553 12/3 - 12/4/2006
Post by: Carnut on December 04, 2006, 02:32:51 AM
Quote from: "MisGivings"
Quote from: "justinsmama"
Quote from: "MisGivings"
Quote from: "Jacqueline"
I have to say that phone call was damn entertaining.

What a tool.


************************************************************
OK, maybe I am just stupid, but what phone call are you talking about? I didn't hear one when watching the segment on The Lineup about the case, so when was it and what show was it on???


Joe T. called in on the Guiford (?) show and had a hissy fit over what Jossy revealed. It was fun! LOL!


************************************************************
OK, I watched the rerun of it and did not hear this. Was it cut out?


Was there any phone call from Joe T.?


Title: Lively Case Discussion #553 12/3 - 12/4/2006
Post by: Angiex911dsptchr on December 04, 2006, 02:33:07 AM
Quote from: "Carnut"
Quote from: "Angiex911dsptchr"
Carnut.. I know of others  who feel the same as you do..
Do you think this is just a ruse? and using this for an excuse that they wouldnt go near a female?   See IMO I think Guido looks like hes a bit light in the loafers,. I know looks dont mean chit.. and I think about what None says about Dutchladys findings about the gay thingy  with Joran?
 I guess I am curious as to why you feel they arnt in a realtioinship together?


Well, I really don't know anymore about the 'facts' than you do, I just have my interpretation of what's been posted.

The original posts about the Guido statement and Jossy's answer on a question about that statement just don't lead me to interpret the responses as saying there was anything gay going on.

I still maintain it's a difference understanding what the word 'relationship' means and how it may have been intended by Guido or how it was recorded by the ALE. Again there's a couple of different languages involved and translations and probably some slang or colloquialisms in the way as well.


 TY .. appreciate your opinion. I do have to agree with you about how the word realtionship can be used.. (not meaning about the case.)


Title: Lively Case Discussion #553 12/3 - 12/4/2006
Post by: Anna on December 04, 2006, 02:33:58 AM
Misgivings,

No, it was after the commercial when she was talking about the spy poisoning.  Apparently, it was unexpected and a surprise.

.

(http://i15.photobucket.com/albums/a360/AnnaBlueSkies/Greetings/Holidays%20and%20BD/thGBREADHS.gif)


Title: Lively Case Discussion #553 12/3 - 12/4/2006
Post by: Anna on December 04, 2006, 02:36:23 AM
Klaas,
I posted a lot of Christmas Icons today.  If you can use any of them or any part of them, feel free to take them just as I did from others, lol.

Might help like wreath around somebody or something.


.(http://i15.photobucket.com/albums/a360/AnnaBlueSkies/Greetings/Holidays%20and%20BD/thwreath05.gif)


Title: Lively Case Discussion #553 12/3 - 12/4/2006
Post by: MisGivings on December 04, 2006, 02:38:24 AM
Quote from: "Anna"
Misgivings,

No, it was after the commercial when she was talking about the spy poisoning.  Apparently, it was unexpected and a surprise.

D'oh, I wasn't in the room for that segment...grrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrr

.

(http://i15.photobucket.com/albums/a360/AnnaBlueSkies/Greetings/Holidays%20and%20BD/thGBREADHS.gif)


Title: Lively Case Discussion #553 12/3 - 12/4/2006
Post by: Angiex911dsptchr on December 04, 2006, 02:49:34 AM
HI Misgivings ! How you be? Hows your weather there?  We had a tornado friday afternoon in my county  :shock:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #553 12/3 - 12/4/2006
Post by: Angiex911dsptchr on December 04, 2006, 03:03:34 AM
Morning Carpe  :)    and nighters for me.. I gots a bad case of cant fall asleep tonight.  Grrrrrrrrrrrr  My nerves are shot me thinks :(


Title: Lively Case Discussion #553 12/3 - 12/4/2006
Post by: carpe noctem on December 04, 2006, 03:05:24 AM
Hi Angie!!!

 :lol:

(http://i76.photobucket.com/albums/j32/carpehumor/JoranfagJpeg.jpg)


Title: Lively Case Discussion #553 12/3 - 12/4/2006
Post by: Angiex911dsptchr on December 04, 2006, 03:06:52 AM
Quote from: "carpe noctem"
Hi Angie!!!

 :lol:

(http://i76.photobucket.com/albums/j32/carpehumor/JoranfagJpeg.jpg)


  ROFLMAO!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!  Love your pics Carpe :) :) :)
Guess Im still wide awake  yet..


Title: Lively Case Discussion #553 12/3 - 12/4/2006
Post by: carpe noctem on December 04, 2006, 03:10:18 AM
any thoughts about WHISKEY JOE and his hysterical rant on THE LINE UP?


Title: Lively Case Discussion #553 12/3 - 12/4/2006
Post by: carpe noctem on December 04, 2006, 03:17:47 AM
(http://i76.photobucket.com/albums/j32/carpehumor/JoranGretajpeg.jpg)

(http://i76.photobucket.com/albums/j32/carpehumor/TALKINBOUT.png)


Title: Lively Case Discussion #553 12/3 - 12/4/2006
Post by: Angiex911dsptchr on December 04, 2006, 03:17:56 AM
Quote from: "carpe noctem"
any thoughts about WHISKEY JOE and his hysterical rant on THE LINE UP?


 IMO he was NOT professional whatsoever.. sounded like his nads were squished in a vicegrip.. for his tone of voice was a bit high :)  IMO.. if he wasnt worried.. he wouldnt have called.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #553 12/3 - 12/4/2006
Post by: Angiex911dsptchr on December 04, 2006, 03:19:37 AM
LMFAO .................


Title: Lively Case Discussion #553 12/3 - 12/4/2006
Post by: carpe noctem on December 04, 2006, 03:22:59 AM
Quote from: "Angiex911dsptchr"
Quote from: "carpe noctem"
any thoughts about WHISKEY JOE and his hysterical rant on THE LINE UP?


 IMO he was NOT professional whatsoever.. sounded like his nads were squished in a vicegrip.. for his tone of voice was a bit high :)  IMO.. if he wasnt worried.. he wouldnt have called.



PRECISELY.

Unprofessional sums it up!

LMAO at the nads comment.

Joe is a disgrace to himself.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #553 12/3 - 12/4/2006
Post by: Anna on December 04, 2006, 03:24:48 AM
Well, Carnut,
Girls don't die from orgasms but people do have homosexual or bisexual realtionships all the time.  I also don't want the Dutch to think I am above smearing their man Joran just as they try to do Natalee constantly.  Dutch don't have any problem with homosexuality and do recognize same sex marriage and all the rest.

I just don't put much of anything as beneath these young thugs and also don't have any interest in protecting Joran's reputation.

But perhaps we will learn more of this sordid affair later as I don't think we have heard the last about Giudo.


Goodnight all!



(http://i15.photobucket.com/albums/a360/AnnaBlueSkies/Greetings/Holidays%20and%20BD/ththxmasb3ar1135419231.gif)


Title: Lively Case Discussion #553 12/3 - 12/4/2006
Post by: carpe noctem on December 04, 2006, 03:26:30 AM
goodnight Anna!


Zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz


Title: Lively Case Discussion #553 12/3 - 12/4/2006
Post by: Angiex911dsptchr on December 04, 2006, 03:27:24 AM
Night Anna~!  Maybe you can catch some Zzzzzzzzzz's for me.
Dunno wth is wrong with me tonight.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #553 12/3 - 12/4/2006
Post by: Angiex911dsptchr on December 04, 2006, 03:28:19 AM
Quote from: "carpe noctem"
Quote from: "Angiex911dsptchr"
Quote from: "carpe noctem"
any thoughts about WHISKEY JOE and his hysterical rant on THE LINE UP?


 IMO he was NOT professional whatsoever.. sounded like his nads were squished in a vicegrip.. for his tone of voice was a bit high :)  IMO.. if he wasnt worried.. he wouldnt have called.



PRECISELY.

Unprofessional sums it up!

LMAO at the nads comment.

Joe is a disgrace to himself.


  :)


Title: Lively Case Discussion #553 12/3 - 12/4/2006
Post by: nonesuche on December 04, 2006, 05:00:57 AM
Well I see carnut has played contrarian again on Guido, some things never change  :lol: Carnut do you know any gay or bisexual men? They don't wear a sign, nor does most of the free world think it's something to be ashamed of, but on Aruba it has a stigma. Boys don't stop to mention or attach a term to a relationship beyond friendship, unless something sexual is afoot with one another  :roll: you conveniently forget his attorney Spong also stated on record Guido is homosexual !

Joe T did indeed call Jossy a "bafoon" and "senile", I Tivo'd it and played it again three separate times. I also cannot remember any defense attorney for OJ or Michael Jackson screaming at a FOX correspondent, much less a host of a show. I can just imagine what BOR will think of that tacky and unprofessional display. That temper tantrum of Joe T's will cost him, you don't attack the hand that feeds you with publicity as he did tonight.

Couldn't happen to a nicer goon..........


Title: Lively Case Discussion #553 12/3 - 12/4/2006
Post by: robots on December 04, 2006, 06:16:36 AM
Quote from: "Anna"
Evidently Crazy Joe just called in without being asked to.  Nothing was said about his being on the program until suddenly there he was screaming in the phone, like it was not planned or anticipated??

He has nothing to do with Aruba, only NY so why is he so hysterical about all this?  Oh, for one thing, he promied the sloots to make people stop saying "bad things" (read the truth) about his delinquent client.  Guess he hates it when he is powerless to do that.  

He can't control what people say or what people think or what people know and he might as well get over it.

 :roll:
(http://i15.photobucket.com/albums/a360/AnnaBlueSkies/Greetings/Holidays%20and%20BD/4d66teq_th.gif)(http://i15.photobucket.com/albums/a360/AnnaBlueSkies/Greetings/Holidays%20and%20BD/4d66teq_th.gif)(http://i15.photobucket.com/albums/a360/AnnaBlueSkies/Greetings/Holidays%20and%20BD/4d66teq_th.gif)(http://i15.photobucket.com/albums/a360/AnnaBlueSkies/Greetings/Holidays%20and%20BD/4d66teq_th.gif)



i wish JOE T. would try to sue someone



i would laugh my _ _ _ off

 :twisted:  :twisted:  :twisted:  :twisted:
wahhhhhhhhhhwahhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhh  whahhhhhhhhh  wahhhhhh


"STOP saying bad things about the SLOOOOOOOTER family Right now"

"my name is JOE T. and i want you to STOP"  

WAHHHHHHHHHHHHH WAHHHHHHHHHHHHHHH WAHHHHHHHH :twisted:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #553 12/3 - 12/4/2006
Post by: blah on December 04, 2006, 06:16:39 AM
Quote from: "nonesuche"
Well I see carnut has played contrarian again on Guido, some things never change  :lol: Carnut do you know any gay or bisexual men? They don't wear a sign, nor does most of the free world think it's something to be ashamed of, but on Aruba it has a stigma. Boys don't stop to mention or attach a term to a relationship beyond friendship, unless something sexual is afoot with one another  :roll: you conveniently forget his attorney Spong also stated on record Guido is homosexual !

Joe T did indeed call Jossy a "bafoon" and "senile", I Tivo'd it and played it again three separate times. I also cannot remember any defense attorney for OJ or Michael Jackson screaming at a FOX correspondent, much less a host of a show. I can just imagine what BOR will think of that tacky and unprofessional display. That temper tantrum of Joe T's will cost him, you don't attack the hand that feeds you with publicity as he did tonight.

Couldn't happen to a nicer goon..........



(http://i57.photobucket.com/albums/g213/woodchuck123/new/nonesuch.jpg)


Title: Lively Case Discussion #553 12/3 - 12/4/2006
Post by: blah on December 04, 2006, 06:37:36 AM
WOW, sounds like I missed the big Taco meltdown last night, is there a video clip I can watch anywhere?


This is great, Jorans lawyer having a meltdown on network TV, this is a VERY good sign !!!


Title: Lively Case Discussion #553 12/3 - 12/4/2006
Post by: justinsmama on December 04, 2006, 07:33:29 AM
Quote from: "blah"
WOW, sounds like I missed the big Taco meltdown last night, is there a video clip I can watch anywhere?


This is great, Jorans lawyer having a meltdown on network TV, this is a VERY good sign !!!


Blah~ I did not see it myself. The monkeys provided such a vivid description that it was as good as having viewed it! Oh, Joe T., you hystrionic idiot! :twisted:  :twisted:  :twisted:  :twisted:  :twisted:  :twisted:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #553 12/3 - 12/4/2006
Post by: justinsmama on December 04, 2006, 07:34:32 AM
That display of his was even crazier than Tom Cruise's! LMAO!


Title: Lively Case Discussion #553 12/3 - 12/4/2006
Post by: justinsmama on December 04, 2006, 07:35:44 AM
Quote from: "justinsmama"
That display of his was even crazier than Tom Cruise's! LMAO!


Or Michael Richards'!

Tacopina's done~ stick a fork in him!


Title: Lively Case Discussion #553 12/3 - 12/4/2006
Post by: San on December 04, 2006, 07:35:59 AM
Quote from: "Angiex911dsptchr"
Quote from: "crazymom"
Quote from: "Angiex911dsptchr"

 HI Crazy~!! :)

Go back a few pages.. San and Jackie posted transcripts of tonights Line Up on FOX~!!!!  :)    It was a god show. Beth was on.. and then Joe T called in and had a hissy fit.. it was amusing as hell.


Thanks Angie,
I went back and read the transcript (thanks you great monkeys) but I was unable to find the part where Taco called in.  Can you tell me what page, please!!!


Heli posted this on RU.. I skipped over the rest of it since you read what San and Jackie had posted..

Kim:

Joran's US attorney has joined us on the telephone, welcome Joe


Joe

I've been watching a bunch of fiction and fantasy on your show, misstatements. I don't pay any attention to Jossy, he's made this a joke, he's fabricated false evidence, he's someone who is on the verge of being senile. He has zero credibility.

Let's get back to what you 're talking about, Antonio Carlo didn't say anything to the prosecutor that remotely resembles that Joran had any involvemnt in Natalee's disappearance. Carlo said nothing of the sort, he represents Joran. He was in court last thursday with Karin discussing the closing of this case once and for all. Karin is not bringing this to any court. Antonio never said any such thing and him losing his law license is just preposterous.

{EDITED}



How can Antonio Carlo be in court when he was removed from the case for speaking to the other suspects.  Did I miss something along the way.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #553 12/3 - 12/4/2006
Post by: sharon on December 04, 2006, 07:38:39 AM
Thanks so much San & Jacquie!

I'll be traveling for work again this week, but for the first time in a very long time I feel optimistic that Justice for Natalee is FINALLY on it's way.

(I hope there is a link posted for the show, though. It sounds like half the fun was watching Tapioca Joe implode  :lol: )

Justice for Natalee
Peace for her family and loved ones


Title: Lively Case Discussion #553 12/3 - 12/4/2006
Post by: carpe noctem on December 04, 2006, 07:46:41 AM
yes, joe really sounded like a hysterical goon last night. i mean, even more so than usual!!!!!!!  :roll:

what a loser.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #553 12/3 - 12/4/2006
Post by: carpe noctem on December 04, 2006, 07:48:48 AM
Angie 911 said "Unprofessional"

I agree, fully with that.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #553 12/3 - 12/4/2006
Post by: robots on December 04, 2006, 07:49:42 AM
JOE TACOPINA blew a gasket  8)


Title: Lively Case Discussion #553 12/3 - 12/4/2006
Post by: bleachedblack on December 04, 2006, 07:51:58 AM
Morning Monkeys, I missed the phone call also. But sounds like it was a glimpse of  Joe T. unplugged  :lol:  Any other info come out?


Title: Lively Case Discussion #553 12/3 - 12/4/2006
Post by: bleachedblack on December 04, 2006, 07:56:32 AM
Joe T.'s phone call coutesy youtube.com....

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rkVOWEclEl8


Title: Lively Case Discussion #553 12/3 - 12/4/2006
Post by: justinsmama on December 04, 2006, 07:58:48 AM
Quote from: "bleachedblack"
Joe T.'s phone call coutesy youtube.com....

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rkVOWEclEl8


Bleached~ You ROCK!


Title: Lively Case Discussion #553 12/3 - 12/4/2006
Post by: carpe noctem on December 04, 2006, 08:07:40 AM
Thanks Bleached!

Here is something I picked up...


A death at Carlos & Charlies??? Any Papiamento
speakers?

 :?:  :?:  :?:

(http://i98.photobucket.com/albums/l266/californialighthousepics1/dec42006.png)


Title: Lively Case Discussion #553 12/3 - 12/4/2006
Post by: Leslie on December 04, 2006, 08:13:10 AM
Diario
http://www.diarioaruba.com/
Amigoe
http://www.amigoe.com/english/
BonDia
http://www.cspnv.com/
Solo di Pueblo
http://www.solodipueblo.com/
AweMainta
http://www.awemainta.com/
Aruba Today
http://www.arubatoday.com/
Translator:
http://papiamentu.donamaro.nl


Title: Lively Case Discussion #553 12/3 - 12/4/2006
Post by: bleachedblack on December 04, 2006, 08:17:56 AM
Quote from: "carpe noctem"
Thanks Bleached!

Here is something I picked up...


A death at Carlos & Charlies??? Any Papiamento
speakers?

 :?:  :?:  :?:

(http://i98.photobucket.com/albums/l266/californialighthousepics1/dec42006.png)


Carpe I think we heard last night that there was a young boy shot and killed outside C+C's , don't remember if it is known what night it was.
I am sure someone here has the facts better than I.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #553 12/3 - 12/4/2006
Post by: MsVada on December 04, 2006, 08:19:40 AM
OMG, Joe T,  you have some poor phone skills!  :roll:

 He got himself wound up enough at the end of that tape that his dogs were barking!


Title: Lively Case Discussion #553 12/3 - 12/4/2006
Post by: bleachedblack on December 04, 2006, 08:21:33 AM
I guess he wasn't that young...it says 27. I think what was said is that there was a fight amongst people hanging around outside C+C's and a fight broke out. The article does seem to say he was killed by a fatal bullet wound.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #553 12/3 - 12/4/2006
Post by: carpe noctem on December 04, 2006, 08:36:52 AM
:lol:  Ms. Darth Vada --- I didn't pick that up the first time around on
                                     watching it on the network version -
                                     but I sure did catch on the
                                     YOU TUBE Replay.


Thanks, BB.


Any idea what this is?

DIARIO - Today

-------------

Documentonan policial ta mustra; ABOGADO DI JORAN VAN DER SLOOT a PIDI JORAN ‘CASI NA YORAMENTO’ PA BISA E BERDAD

ORANJESTAD (AAN) --- Recientemente un reportero investigativo na Hulanda a sacodi un rato e caso di Natalee Halloway ora cu den su programa special na television nan a bin saca afor, cu supuestamente abogado di Van Der Sloot a papia cu Fiscal Mayor Janssen y duna e fiscal indicacion cu Joran van der Sloot lo sa mucho mas di e caso di Natalee.

E programa aki a causa furor na Hulanda, Antiyas, Merca y tambe na Aruba pasobra ningun hende tabata na altura di e supuesto conversacion cu e abogado di Van der Sloot lo tabata tin na un forma no formal cu e fiscal mayor, pa asina duna e fiscal indicacion cu Joran lo tabata sa mucho mas di loke e tabata declara na autoridadnan.


-------


Title: Lively Case Discussion #553 12/3 - 12/4/2006
Post by: sharon on December 04, 2006, 08:45:23 AM
Quote from: "bleachedblack"
Joe T.'s phone call coutesy youtube.com....

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rkVOWEclEl8


Thanks BB!

Those last 20 seconds of JoeT are PRICELESS  :lol:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #553 12/3 - 12/4/2006
Post by: Peaches on December 04, 2006, 08:50:26 AM
Quote from: "Ms.DarthVada"
OMG, Joe T,  you have some poor phone skills!  :roll:

 He got himself wound up enough at the end of that tape that his dogs were barking!


To me, nothing screams GUILTY like your attorney calling in to a TV show to throw a big tantrum.  Between the name-calling and the hysteria, yeah, I can see where your client's just been maligned by the big bad media......NOT.

I don't see TACO suing Dr. Phil or anybody else.  Hmmmm, no grounds?  Frivolous lawsuit?


Title: Lively Case Discussion #553 12/3 - 12/4/2006
Post by: robots on December 04, 2006, 08:55:21 AM
JOE skkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkeeeeeeeerrrrrred his DOGS

 :lol:  :lol:  :lol:  :lol:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #553 12/3 - 12/4/2006
Post by: Peaches on December 04, 2006, 09:02:28 AM
Quote from: "robots"
JOE skkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkeeeeeeeerrrrrred his DOGS

 :lol:  :lol:  :lol:  :lol:


I hope the barking dogs didn't scare his poor children!


Title: Lively Case Discussion #553 12/3 - 12/4/2006
Post by: BTgirl on December 04, 2006, 09:07:27 AM
Quote from: "Peaches"
Quote from: "robots"
JOE skkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkeeeeeeeerrrrrred his DOGS

 :lol:  :lol:  :lol:  :lol:


I hope the barking dogs didn't scare his poor children!


O/T

Hi Peaches. Are you feeling better today?


Title: Lively Case Discussion #553 12/3 - 12/4/2006
Post by: Peaches on December 04, 2006, 09:27:31 AM
BT, it's Monday morning.  I feel as good as anyone does on a Monday morning.  Seriously, the bone pain has backed off a little and I can feel bad at the office as easy as I can at home.  

I missed the Taco Joe extravaganza last nite.  I think my Lunesta heard him coming...............Thank goodness for YouTube!  Now I can listen to his tantrum anytime I want!


Title: Lively Case Discussion #553 12/3 - 12/4/2006
Post by: BTgirl on December 04, 2006, 09:41:33 AM
Quote from: "Peaches"
BT, it's Monday morning.  I feel as good as anyone does on a Monday morning.  Seriously, the bone pain has backed off a little and I can feel bad at the office as easy as I can at home.  

I missed the Taco Joe extravaganza last nite.  I think my Lunesta heard him coming...............Thank goodness for YouTube!  Now I can listen to his tantrum anytime I want!


I'm glad the bone pain is a bit better, and I heard that about feeling bad at the office! I wimped out this morning, though. I've got a tummy bug this morning and stayed home.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #553 12/3 - 12/4/2006
Post by: Peaches on December 04, 2006, 09:54:57 AM
Quote from: "BTgirl"
Quote from: "Peaches"
BT, it's Monday morning.  I feel as good as anyone does on a Monday morning.  Seriously, the bone pain has backed off a little and I can feel bad at the office as easy as I can at home.  

I missed the Taco Joe extravaganza last nite.  I think my Lunesta heard him coming...............Thank goodness for YouTube!  Now I can listen to his tantrum anytime I want!


I'm glad the bone pain is a bit better, and I heard that about feeling bad at the office! I wimped out this morning, though. I've got a tummy bug this morning and stayed home.


I did that last Friday.  I didn't feel good at all and neither did my DD so we both stayed home.  The best part of the day was knowing my baby (who will be 16 this Thursday) was upstairs asleep safe in her own bed.

Sorry to hear about the tummy bug.  Remember, lots of fluids, preferably water or juice.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #553 12/3 - 12/4/2006
Post by: SunnyinTX on December 04, 2006, 09:59:53 AM
Good Morning Monks.

I have been away for a while and missed y'all....I caught the show last night....Taco is an idiot!!  I am going to go and read and try to get caught up....I hope everyone is well....and I hope this is the break that is needed to bring JUSTICE FOR NATALEE


Title: Lively Case Discussion #553 12/3 - 12/4/2006
Post by: Florida on December 04, 2006, 10:04:44 AM
About Joe T.:

"Methinks...Thou doth protest too much."


Title: Lively Case Discussion #553 12/3 - 12/4/2006
Post by: Peaches on December 04, 2006, 10:05:15 AM
Quote from: "SunnyinTX"
Good Morning Monks.

I have been away for a while and missed y'all....I caught the show last night....Taco is an idiot!!  I am going to go and read and try to get caught up....I hope everyone is well....and I hope this is the break that is needed to bring JUSTICE FOR NATALEE


Do not miss the YOU TUBE of Joe T losing it!  It'll make your day!


Title: Lively Case Discussion #553 12/3 - 12/4/2006
Post by: MsVada on December 04, 2006, 10:11:36 AM
Peaches

So glad to hear your pain is a bit less today... There is nothing worse than bone pain!  We had surgeons tell us that in Boston a few years back when we were going down there with our son for treatments.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #553 12/3 - 12/4/2006
Post by: 2NJSons_Mom on December 04, 2006, 10:12:39 AM
Quote from: "bleachedblack"
Joe T.'s phone call coutesy youtube.com....

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rkVOWEclEl8


Thanks for this, bleachedblack.  I missed the show and was too tired to stay up for the replay.  Much appreciated.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #553 12/3 - 12/4/2006
Post by: Nut44x4 on December 04, 2006, 10:29:14 AM
Quote from: "nonesuche"
Klaas !!!! THANK YOU I LOVE MY STAR !!!!!!!! (http://i86.photobucket.com/albums/k101/daisysistah/GIFS/smilies/girl/girl_in_love.gif)

Hey San  :D  hey CBB  :D

okay I have 20 cookies done and in the oven, off with that rolling pin I go again !!  :lol:



Just love your smiley Santa sleigh thingy going on there...I copied it and put it on my Desktop 4 the Holiday, lol. Please send cookies to Bangor, Maine...lol.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #553 12/3 - 12/4/2006
Post by: crazybabyborg on December 04, 2006, 10:31:54 AM
Quote from: "nonesuche"
Well I see carnut has played contrarian again on Guido, some things never change  :lol: Carnut do you know any gay or bisexual men? They don't wear a sign, nor does most of the free world think it's something to be ashamed of, but on Aruba it has a stigma. Boys don't stop to mention or attach a term to a relationship beyond friendship, unless something sexual is afoot with one another  :roll: you conveniently forget his attorney Spong also stated on record Guido is homosexual !

Joe T did indeed call Jossy a "bafoon" and "senile", I Tivo'd it and played it again three separate times. I also cannot remember any defense attorney for OJ or Michael Jackson screaming at a FOX correspondent, much less a host of a show. I can just imagine what BOR will think of that tacky and unprofessional display. That temper tantrum of Joe T's will cost him, you don't attack the hand that feeds you with publicity as he did tonight.

Couldn't happen to a nicer goon..........


Yeah and even though he didn't scream at news reporters, look how THAT turned out!

(http://i25.photobucket.com/albums/c100/crazybabyborgs/Johnny_Cochran_headstone.jpg)


Title: Lively Case Discussion #553 12/3 - 12/4/2006
Post by: Nut44x4 on December 04, 2006, 10:32:22 AM
Quote from: "Anna"
Well, Carnut,
Girls don't die from orgasms but people do have homosexual or bisexual realtionships all the time.  I also don't want the Dutch to think I am above smearing their man Joran just as they try to do Natalee constantly.  Dutch don't have any problem with homosexuality and do recognize same sex marriage and all the rest.

I just don't put much of anything as beneath these young thugs and also don't have any interest in protecting Joran's reputation.

But perhaps we will learn more of this sordid affair later as I don't think we have heard the last about Giudo.


Goodnight all!



(http://i15.photobucket.com/albums/a360/AnnaBlueSkies/Greetings/Holidays%20and%20BD/ththxmasb3ar1135419231.gif)




Lmao @ dying from an orgasm....what a way to go...sorry, lol. I can't help myself.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #553 12/3 - 12/4/2006
Post by: Jacqueline on December 04, 2006, 10:33:59 AM
Good morning Monkeys...

Thanks to Bleached for the You Tube, I heard it last night but would love to hear it again...

Peaches and BT hope you are both feeling better..

2NJ, not only did Rutgers lose but oh my Giants... :oops:

Last night I was doing a little research on Joey T, and did not know that he was a Pros attorney at one time but did not find it fulfilling.  He had been accepted at West Point Military but ended up going somewhere else.  It was a pretty interesting article on him from a Skidmore news letter that was written in 2003.  If anyone is interested I'll post it...


Title: Lively Case Discussion #553 12/3 - 12/4/2006
Post by: Mere on December 04, 2006, 10:35:58 AM
Good morning friends.... :)

I think JT was such a nut last night because he was not cuddled and cradled by KG as he usually is on Fox....she wanted the truth....he can't tell the truth.....


Title: Lively Case Discussion #553 12/3 - 12/4/2006
Post by: Jacqueline on December 04, 2006, 10:38:24 AM
Quote from: "MeMere"
Good morning friends.... :)

I think JT was such a nut last night because he was not cuddled and cradled by KG as he usually is on Fox....she wanted the truth....he can't tell the truth.....


The fact that he called in on a Sunday evening while he was probably relaxing at home with his family shows that he was pretty upset at what was being presented.  I have heard  him say before there are alot of lies out there, false facts, but he was really in a tizzy...

Something struck a nerve with him, big time.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #553 12/3 - 12/4/2006
Post by: LilPuma on December 04, 2006, 10:41:09 AM
Quote from: "SunnyinTX"
Good Morning Monks.

I have been away for a while and missed y'all....I caught the show last night....Taco is an idiot!!  I am going to go and read and try to get caught up....I hope everyone is well....and I hope this is the break that is needed to bring JUSTICE FOR NATALEE


I thought that Jossy and Peter did a much better job of making their points in a classy and professional manner than did Joe Tacopina.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #553 12/3 - 12/4/2006
Post by: San on December 04, 2006, 10:41:27 AM
Quote from: "bleachedblack"
Joe T.'s phone call coutesy youtube.com....

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rkVOWEclEl8

Thanks bleached I missed this part of the show last night.  Robots is right Joe sure blew a gasket.  His voice went to high that his dog started barking at the end :lol:  :lol: .


Title: Lively Case Discussion #553 12/3 - 12/4/2006
Post by: klaasend on December 04, 2006, 10:42:15 AM
http://www.diario-aruba.com/2006/12/4/

Documentonan policial ta mustra; ABOGADO DI JORAN VAN DER SLOOT a PIDI JORAN ‘CASI NA YORAMENTO’ PA BISA E BERDAD

ORANJESTAD (AAN) --- Recientemente un reportero investigativo na Hulanda a sacodi un rato e caso di Natalee Halloway ora cu den su programa special na television nan a bin saca afor, cu supuestamente abogado di Van Der Sloot a papia cu Fiscal Mayor Janssen y duna e fiscal indicacion cu Joran van der Sloot lo sa mucho mas di e caso di Natalee.

E programa aki a causa furor na Hulanda, Antiyas, Merca y tambe na Aruba pasobra ningun hende tabata na altura di e supuesto conversacion cu e abogado di Van der Sloot lo tabata tin na un forma no formal cu e fiscal mayor, pa asina duna e fiscal indicacion cu Joran lo tabata sa mucho mas di loke e tabata declara na autoridadnan.

Abogado di Van Der Sloot na Aruba, señor Carlo a nenga rotundamente cu e lo tabata tin un conversacion no oficial cu fiscal mayor Janssen y cu e a declara cu su cliente lo tabata sa mas di loke e tabata bisa polisnan.

Awe e team investigativo di DIARIO ta publica algun parti di documentonan cu a worde haya den e investigacion riba desaparicion di Natalee Halloway y cada ken por lesa pa nan mes awe loke un funcionario policial hulandes a pone riba papel relaciona cu interogacion cu su persona a haci cu Joran van der Sloot.

‘E sospechoso (aki ;Joran van der Sloot) a bisa, manera cu mi ( ‘Mi’ ta e funcionario policial hulandes) a tende, cu el (Joran van der Sloot) a puntra su mama pa tuma contacto telefonico cu e testigo Zedan Arambatzis, pa saca afor kico el a declara na polis’.

‘E sospechoso a conta cu su abogado Carlo, na un forma di den confianza, tambe a tende e storia di e testigo Zedan Arambatzis y cu e abogado a pidi Joran van der Sloot e dia siguiente na un forma ‘casi na yoramento’ pa e bay bisa e berdad’.

‘E sospechoso a conta cu abogado Carlo a informe (esta informa Joran van der Sloot) cu e testigo Zedan Arambatzis a declara encuanto Fishermanshut’. ‘Van der Sloot a declara cu a base di e informacion aki, el a dicidi di bisa e berdad, esta cu el a laga Natalee atras na Fishermanshut’.

Analisando loke tin poni riba papel di documentonan di interogacion haci door di entre otro polisnan special di Hulanda cu a bin te Aruba pa yuda soluciona e caso di desaparicion di Natalee Halloway, cualkier investigador lo haci e siguiente preguntanan y tambe remarkenan; (1) Di con Joran van der Sloot a pidi su mama pa yama Zedan Arambatzis pa puntra e testigo aki kico el a declara na polis?
(2) Kico Zedan a declara na e mama di Joran van der Sloot?
(3) E mama di Joran van der Sloot a worde interoga basa riba e informacionnan aki cu polis mes a pone riba papel?
(4) Riba ki dia Joran a pidi su mama pa bay averigua declaracion haci door di Zedan Arambatzis y ki dia e mama a yama e testigo aki y kico e testigo aki a declara na e mama di Joran y kende na su turno a informa su yiu di kico e testigo a declara?
(5) Di con e abogado ta bay puntra e sospechoso Joran, cual ta su cliente, na un forma ‘casi na yoramento’ pa e bisa e berdad?
(6) Na cua berdad ta worde referi aki?
(7) E supuesto berdad cu Joran mes ta bisa despues, cu el a laga Natalee atras na Fishermanshut?
(8) Si esey ta e berdad anto no tabata tin nada dje malo ey of dje impactante cu e abogado supuestamente lo mester a pidi Joran van der Sloot ‘casi na yoramento’ pa bisa e berdad?!
(9) Encuanto cu e abogado a tende e storia di e testigo Zedan na un forma di ‘den confianza’ ta habri caminda pa puntra; na unda el a tende e storia aki den confianza y for di ken y ken mas tabata sa di e supuesto storia aki y con bin un abogado a tende esaki ‘den confianza’ siendo cu Joran ta su cliente y cuanto informacion mas estilo ‘den confianza’ a keda scondi y cu te awe henter pueblo di Aruba ta paga e prijs miyonario pa loke pueblo no tin ni arte ni parti den dje ?
Esakinan ta djis algun observacion den e caso mas controversial cu husticia na Aruba y Reino Hulandes a yega di conoce, pero cu poco poco e berdad ta saliendo na claridad di dia.

Keda pendiente pa e dianan cu ta bin pasobra tin hopi y hopi mas pa sali y ta hopi pregunta mester bay haya contesta pasobra no por ta asina cu tin preto riba blanco poni, cu por lo menos dos persona a declara na polis kico a pasa cu Natalee unda cu Joran su nomber ta keda bin pa dilanti como e persona cu lo sa kico a pasa cu Natalee of a hunga un rol grandi den henter e caso, anto keto bay autoridadnan hudicial no por presenta un caso penal den corte.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #553 12/3 - 12/4/2006
Post by: San on December 04, 2006, 10:44:46 AM
Last week on a news show Joe Tocopina said Antonio Carlo was Joran's former attorney now he is saying his attorney.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #553 12/3 - 12/4/2006
Post by: Hotshot on December 04, 2006, 10:44:56 AM
testing avatar


Title: Lively Case Discussion #553 12/3 - 12/4/2006
Post by: klaasend on December 04, 2006, 10:48:34 AM
From another site.  According to the Diario article today, Freddy Arambatzis also claims in a statement that Carlo was almost crying saying Joran needs to tell the truth.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #553 12/3 - 12/4/2006
Post by: San on December 04, 2006, 10:48:43 AM
Quote from: "Anna"
Misgivings,

No, it was after the commercial when she was talking about the spy poisoning.  Apparently, it was unexpected and a surprise.
.

(http://i15.photobucket.com/albums/a360/AnnaBlueSkies/Greetings/Holidays%20and%20BD/thGBREADHS.gif)

Oh now I understand how I missed him being on.  I had turned my tape off after Beth was finished and started to transcribe the first part.  When I posted it I realized I missed Joe T.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #553 12/3 - 12/4/2006
Post by: Peaches on December 04, 2006, 10:49:24 AM
Jacqueline, I'd be interested to read the article on TacoJoe.  

Thank you.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #553 12/3 - 12/4/2006
Post by: 2NJSons_Mom on December 04, 2006, 10:49:45 AM
Quote from: "San"
Last week on a news show Joe Tocopina said Antonio Carlo was Joran's former attorney now he is saying his attorney.


Yes, I picked up on that, too, San.  (I still can't get past the fact that PVDS is supposedly employed by Carlo, as well.  What next?  JVDS an intern for Joe T?)


Title: Lively Case Discussion #553 12/3 - 12/4/2006
Post by: 2NJSons_Mom on December 04, 2006, 10:53:07 AM
Quote from: "klaasend"
From another site.  According to the Diario article today, Freddy Arambatzis also claims in a statement that Carlo was almost crying saying Joran needs to tell the truth.


So, was Carlo Freddy's attorney from the beginning?  Just wondering how else Freddy could make this claim and how it could be witnessed otherwise.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #553 12/3 - 12/4/2006
Post by: San on December 04, 2006, 10:54:49 AM
Quote from: "Jacqueline"
Quote from: "MeMere"
Good morning friends.... :)

I think JT was such a nut last night because he was not cuddled and cradled by KG as he usually is on Fox....she wanted the truth....he can't tell the truth.....


The fact that he called in on a Sunday evening while he was probably relaxing at home with his family shows that he was pretty upset at what was being presented.  I have heard  him say before there are alot of lies out there, false facts, but he was really in a tizzy...

Something struck a nerve with him, big time.

That something is called the TRUTH. It usually strikes a nerve in all criminals.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #553 12/3 - 12/4/2006
Post by: SunnyinTX on December 04, 2006, 10:55:11 AM
Quote from: "LilPuma"


I thought that Jossy and Peter did a much better job of making their points in a classy and professional manner than did Joe Tacopina.


Taco Joe sounded like he was shocked and he couldn't think straight...so he accused and rambled IMO.

does anyone know if Beth and Dave have heard this tape that Josie has??  Sorry if this has been discussed I am far, far behind


Title: Lively Case Discussion #553 12/3 - 12/4/2006
Post by: NM on December 04, 2006, 10:57:16 AM
Quote from: "LilPuma"
Question for the Monkey Brain Trust:  

Is there a correlation between Joe Mammana's recent problems and the case against J2K heating up?  Think.  Ponder.


I'm pages behind.

Hey Lilpuma,
I think there has to be a correlation. Also, Joe did "call out" posner.
I was really happy to hear Beth is standing up for him.
I don't buy these charges against Joe.

Hey Monkeys.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #553 12/3 - 12/4/2006
Post by: San on December 04, 2006, 10:58:20 AM
Quote from: "LilPuma"
Quote from: "SunnyinTX"
Good Morning Monks.

I have been away for a while and missed y'all....I caught the show last night....Taco is an idiot!!  I am going to go and read and try to get caught up....I hope everyone is well....and I hope this is the break that is needed to bring JUSTICE FOR NATALEE


I thought that Jossy and Peter did a much better job of making their points in a classy and professional manner than did Joe Tacopina.

Of course they did.  That's the difference between class and no class.

When Peter De Vries responded to the question about Joe. T. he politely said Mr. Tocopina.   Joe T. acted as if he was in a school yard fight and was calling Peter all kinds of names.   What an embarrassment.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #553 12/3 - 12/4/2006
Post by: justinsmama on December 04, 2006, 10:59:33 AM
Sunny, yes, he did make several accusations, many (perhaps all) which were FALSE. Oh, how I fervently wish Jossy, Beth, and even Dompig would sue him for defamation!


Title: Lively Case Discussion #553 12/3 - 12/4/2006
Post by: justinsmama on December 04, 2006, 11:00:27 AM
Justin's school let out at 10 am. No heat. It was 12 degrees outside this morning.  :?


Title: Lively Case Discussion #553 12/3 - 12/4/2006
Post by: San on December 04, 2006, 11:00:50 AM
According to these statements we have confirmation that Joran was in fact driving the Kalpoe car.  Another lie he told on Greta.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #553 12/3 - 12/4/2006
Post by: klaasend on December 04, 2006, 11:01:06 AM
From what I understand, Jossy will be printing more each day in Diario.  

Seems very quiet this morning at FOB and RU, lol  :lol:  :lol:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #553 12/3 - 12/4/2006
Post by: San on December 04, 2006, 11:02:42 AM
I just remember something.  Joe Tacopina said that Gerald Dompig was fired because he went on TV saying Natalee died of an overdose.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #553 12/3 - 12/4/2006
Post by: San on December 04, 2006, 11:03:36 AM
Quote from: "klaasend"
From what I understand, Jossy will be printing more each day in Diario.  

Seems very quiet this morning at FOB and RU, lol  :lol:  :lol:

That's great news.

Joe T. better get some more gaskets :lol:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #553 12/3 - 12/4/2006
Post by: Jacqueline on December 04, 2006, 11:04:41 AM
Quote from: "Peaches"
Jacqueline, I'd be interested to read the article on TacoJoe.  

Thank you.


http://www.skidmore.edu/scope/winter2003/features/powerplays.html

Here you go...From 2003 on Joe Taco.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #553 12/3 - 12/4/2006
Post by: Mere on December 04, 2006, 11:06:02 AM
I think JT's diarrheal episode started after he heard the show refer to Peter's candid camera and Jossy's video tape.....this is rock solid information that you can't just scream away....you might argue the contents someday....but you can't say that they don't exist....!


Title: Lively Case Discussion #553 12/3 - 12/4/2006
Post by: Mere on December 04, 2006, 11:07:18 AM
Sorry....that would be diarrhea of the mouth..... :D


Title: Lively Case Discussion #553 12/3 - 12/4/2006
Post by: NM on December 04, 2006, 11:08:32 AM
Quote from: "Anna"
Quote from: "LilPuma"
Question for the Monkey Brain Trust:  

Is there a correlation between Joe Mammana's recent problems and the case against J2K heating up?  Think.  Ponder.



Remember Joe T had his detractors when he asked the City of Philadelphia I think it was to join the boycott?  And the detective who Paulus I think it was hired, Ruzzio of the dirty tricks if from there, isn't he?

Yeah, I wonder if he has stirred up a few enemies closer to home than he might have expected just from supporting this family.  Some may well have large financial interests in Aruba and be really mad at Joe for becoming involved.

Sure makes ya wonder!

(http://i15.photobucket.com/albums/a360/AnnaBlueSkies/Greetings/Holidays%20and%20BD/thAnimation22222.gif)

Hey Anna,
pvds' detective Rizzo is not the same Rizzo (Frank aka Franny) who is a city concileman in Phila and who's father was mayor in phila.  
Frank Rizzo of phila was and probably is very against the boycott, here are some posts from Bondia:
http://www.scaredmonkeys.net/viewtopic.php?t=3217&postdays=0&postorder=asc&start=440

Rizzo is a Distinguished Guest of Aruba, owns property and loves the island and it's people. I don't think he has to be corupt or paid to love Aruba???

http://www.scaredmonkeys.net/viewtopic.php?t=3217&postdays=0&postorder=asc&start=400

I've never spoke to Ernie Rizzo, I have spoke to Frank Rizzo and I called Posner to see what his take on Mammana's comments were?


Also John Pauly worked and still lives in the phila area.
I believe Joe M has made some enimees here in his home town.

And I will be looking over my should now that I posted this.
The phila Rizzos are very scary. IMO.

One more thing for some reason dompig came to phila (late 2005?)to consult w/ the phila police. another scary group IMO.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #553 12/3 - 12/4/2006
Post by: San on December 04, 2006, 11:08:37 AM
Quote from: "MeMere"
I think JT's diarrheal episode started after he heard the show refer to Peter's candid camera and Jossy's video tape.....this is rock solid information that you can't just scream away....you might argue the contents someday....but you can't say that they don't exist....!

I agree.  Joe T. made fun of Peter De Vries the other day when this news first broke.  Peter showed a little piece of the video last night.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #553 12/3 - 12/4/2006
Post by: Mere on December 04, 2006, 11:09:24 AM
Klaas...I tried the translator on the Dario article and came up with almost nothing....will we be able to pull some information from this...?


Title: Lively Case Discussion #553 12/3 - 12/4/2006
Post by: klaasend on December 04, 2006, 11:10:25 AM
Quote from: "MeMere"
Klaas...I tried the translator on the Dario article and came up with almost nothing....will we be able to pull some information from this...?


I'm sure we'll get some translations later today.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #553 12/3 - 12/4/2006
Post by: Peaches on December 04, 2006, 11:15:59 AM
Quote from: "MeMere"
Sorry....that would be diarrhea of the mouth..... :D


I believe it comes with a side effect:  constipation of the brain.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #553 12/3 - 12/4/2006
Post by: memphis on December 04, 2006, 11:23:14 AM
BB ~ Thanks for the uTube link. I don't have cable, so could only go by monkey's description.

Just a note (not important) ~ I think the dogs barking belonged to Akita77, the person who taped it and put in on uTube.

Hotshot ~ you look adorable!!  :D

BB needs some Christmas attire.  :wink:

I'm just peeking in. Must, must stay away today. Must stay away, must stay away... It's hard but I gotta get stuff done.  :lol:  See ya'll later.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #553 12/3 - 12/4/2006
Post by: SunnyinTX on December 04, 2006, 11:26:17 AM
Quote from: "justinsmama"
Sunny, yes, he did make several accusations, many (perhaps all) which were FALSE. Oh, how I fervently wish Jossy, Beth, and even Dompig would sue him for defamation!


Why is TacoJoe even sticking his nose in it?  He was the lawyer for the US suit only!   He must need some business or exposure!!


Title: Lively Case Discussion #553 12/3 - 12/4/2006
Post by: SunnyinTX on December 04, 2006, 11:28:10 AM
Quote from: "justinsmama"
Justin's school let out at 10 am. No heat. It was 12 degrees outside this morning.  :?


Ouch ...that gives me the shivers just reading it...stay warm!!


Title: Lively Case Discussion #553 12/3 - 12/4/2006
Post by: SunnyinTX on December 04, 2006, 11:29:04 AM
Quote from: "San"
I just remember something.  Joe Tacopina said that Gerald Dompig was fired because he went on TV saying Natalee died of an overdose.


I heard that too and sinceI am not up on the happenings wondered about it


Title: Lively Case Discussion #553 12/3 - 12/4/2006
Post by: Peaches on December 04, 2006, 11:32:29 AM
Quote from: "SunnyinTX"
Quote from: "justinsmama"
Sunny, yes, he did make several accusations, many (perhaps all) which were FALSE. Oh, how I fervently wish Jossy, Beth, and even Dompig would sue him for defamation!


Why is TacoJoe even sticking his nose in it?  He was the lawyer for the US suit only!   He must need some business or exposure!!


Or maybe one of his biggest fans at FOB called him to give him a chance to whine at Kimberly.......

Thanks for the article, Jac.  It's  interesting.  I still don't like him.  I don't like his attitude.  Never have.  Didn't like him the first time I saw him on TV.  Like him even less now.  Nobody likes a whiner.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #553 12/3 - 12/4/2006
Post by: Jacqueline on December 04, 2006, 11:37:31 AM
Quote from: "Peaches"
Quote from: "SunnyinTX"
Quote from: "justinsmama"
Sunny, yes, he did make several accusations, many (perhaps all) which were FALSE. Oh, how I fervently wish Jossy, Beth, and even Dompig would sue him for defamation!


Why is TacoJoe even sticking his nose in it?  He was the lawyer for the US suit only!   He must need some business or exposure!!


Or maybe one of his biggest fans at FOB called him to give him a chance to whine at Kimberly.......

Thanks for the article, Jac.  It's  interesting.  I still don't like him.  I don't like his attitude.  Never have.  Didn't like him the first time I saw him on TV.  Like him even less now.  Nobody likes a whiner.


I don't like em either.. :lol:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #553 12/3 - 12/4/2006
Post by: San on December 04, 2006, 11:42:28 AM
What I would like to know is how Tacopina would know first hand that Gerald Dompig was fired.  He is admitting right there that the ALE and government are keeping him informed on what is going on with the coverup.

Can you hear it now "OK Joe we took care of the Dompig issue what do you want us to do next". :roll:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #553 12/3 - 12/4/2006
Post by: SunnyinTX on December 04, 2006, 11:42:39 AM
Quote from: "Jacqueline"
Quote from: "Peaches"


Or maybe one of his biggest fans at FOB called him to give him a chance to whine at Kimberly.......

Thanks for the article, Jac.  It's  interesting.  I still don't like him.  I don't like his attitude.  Never have.  Didn't like him the first time I saw him on TV.  Like him even less now.  Nobody likes a whiner.


I don't like em either.. :lol:


LOL...me three...he acts as slimy as looks


Title: Lively Case Discussion #553 12/3 - 12/4/2006
Post by: Peaches on December 04, 2006, 11:45:26 AM
Quote from: "San"
What I would like to know is how Tacopina would know first hand that Gerald Dompig was fired.  He is admitting right there that the ALE and government are keeping him informed on what is going on with the coverup.

Can you hear it now "OK Joe we took care of the Dompig issue what do you want us to do next". :roll:


I can't imagine that Taco Joe has so ingratiated himself with Aruba that they are now telling him all their secrets.   Dompig's work status is hardly Taco's business.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #553 12/3 - 12/4/2006
Post by: San on December 04, 2006, 11:50:00 AM
Quote from: "Peaches"
Quote from: "San"
What I would like to know is how Tacopina would know first hand that Gerald Dompig was fired.  He is admitting right there that the ALE and government are keeping him informed on what is going on with the coverup.

Can you hear it now "OK Joe we took care of the Dompig issue what do you want us to do next". :roll:


I can't imagine that Taco Joe has so ingratiated himself with Aruba that they are now telling him all their secrets.   Dompig's work status is hardly Taco's business.

I agree Peaches but this was the first time that I heard that Gerald Dompig was fired.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #553 12/3 - 12/4/2006
Post by: blah on December 04, 2006, 11:54:27 AM
Quote from: "bleachedblack"
Joe T.'s phone call coutesy youtube.com....

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rkVOWEclEl8


bleachedblack - thanks, that was AWESOME.  TOTAL MELTDOWN BY THE GOONS PAID LIAR !!!!


Title: Lively Case Discussion #553 12/3 - 12/4/2006
Post by: justinsmama on December 04, 2006, 11:56:07 AM
Quote from: "blah"
Quote from: "bleachedblack"
Joe T.'s phone call coutesy youtube.com....

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rkVOWEclEl8


bleachedblack - thanks, that was AWESOME.  TOTAL MELTDOWN BY THE GOONS PAID LIAR !!!!


JT is a jackass.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #553 12/3 - 12/4/2006
Post by: the big hammer on December 04, 2006, 11:56:52 AM
Li'l Joey Was a Little Shrill

san writes: "I just remember something. Joe Tacopina said that Gerald Dompig was fired because he went on TV saying Natalee died of an overdose."

That's what I thought, too.  Maybe Dompig was tossed because he couldn't "SELL" this false claim, as Baden came in right on top of this with a medically sound declaration stating that a drug OD death takes hours, making audiences fear something really macabre had transpired, inciting even more revulsion for Aruban leadership.  

Tacopina's performance last nite was strange.  His name-calling and puffery came across as down-right juvenile.  Far from a "professional" performance.

san did a great transcript last nite of the interview Kimberly held w/ Beth and DeVries --

Does anybody have a transcript of the later call in by Tacopina?  I think this one is worth saving: we have the Carlo mixup (is he joran's attorney or not) and the reason for Dompig's firing.  Or maybe Taco just lied throughout (again).

.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #553 12/3 - 12/4/2006
Post by: blah on December 04, 2006, 11:58:37 AM
Quote from: "bleachedblack"
Joe T.'s phone call coutesy youtube.com....

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rkVOWEclEl8


I added Joe's meltdown link to my sig line, hope you dont mind, it is just too priceless !!!!!


Title: Lively Case Discussion #553 12/3 - 12/4/2006
Post by: Peaches on December 04, 2006, 11:58:59 AM
Quote from: "San"
Quote from: "Peaches"
Quote from: "San"
What I would like to know is how Tacopina would know first hand that Gerald Dompig was fired.  He is admitting right there that the ALE and government are keeping him informed on what is going on with the coverup.

Can you hear it now "OK Joe we took care of the Dompig issue what do you want us to do next". :roll:


I can't imagine that Taco Joe has so ingratiated himself with Aruba that they are now telling him all their secrets.   Dompig's work status is hardly Taco's business.

I agree Peaches but this was the first time that I heard that Gerald Dompig was fired.


I thought he just found his calling and headed off to medical school.   :roll:  :roll:  :roll:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #553 12/3 - 12/4/2006
Post by: Jacqueline on December 04, 2006, 12:02:32 PM
Quote from: Peaches
Quote from: San
Quote from: Peaches
Quote from: "San"
What I would like to know is how Tacopina would know first hand that Gerald
I thought he just found his calling and headed off to medical school.   :roll:  :roll:  :roll:


LOL..Dr. Dompig.....tha's scary... :lol:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #553 12/3 - 12/4/2006
Post by: blah on December 04, 2006, 12:03:08 PM
Quote from: "klaasend"
From another site.  According to the Diario article today, Freddy Arambatzis also claims in a statement that Carlo was almost crying saying Joran needs to tell the truth.



Sounds to me like any good cop would be able to make Carlo crack and spill the beans.  Dont they have laws that lwyers cannot LIE for their clients?  Maybe they need to threaten some action against Carlo to get him to spill it !!


Title: Lively Case Discussion #553 12/3 - 12/4/2006
Post by: klaasend on December 04, 2006, 12:04:11 PM
Quote from: "the big hammer"
Li'l Joey Was a Little Shrill

san writes: "I just remember something. Joe Tacopina said that Gerald Dompig was fired because he went on TV saying Natalee died of an overdose."

That's what I thought, too.  Maybe Dompig was tossed because he couldn't "SELL" this false claim, as Baden came in right on top of this with a medically sound declaration stating that a drug OD death takes hours, making audiences fear something really macabre had transpired, inciting even more revulsion for Aruban leadership.  

Tacopina's performance last nite was strange.  His name-calling and puffery came across as down-right juvenile.  Far from a "professional" performance.

san did a great transcript last nite of the interview Kimberly held w/ Beth and DeVries --

Does anybody have a transcript of the later call in by Tacopina?  I think this one is worth saving: we have the Carlo mixup (is he joran's attorney or not) and the reason for Dompig's firing.  Or maybe Taco just lied throughout (again).

.


Here is that part of the Lineup as transcribed by Heli at Refugees.  Since they worship Joe T they may have been able to transcribe without laughing  :wink:

Kim:

Joran's US attorney has joined us on the telephone, welcome Joe


Kim:

Joran's US attorney has joined us on the telephone, welcome Joe


Joe

I've been watching a bunch of fiction and fantasy on your show, misstatements. I don't pay any attention to Jossy Mansur, he's an individual whose made this a joke, he's fabricated false evidence, he's been cited by the aruban court for fabricating false evidence he's someone who is on the verge of being senile. So I'm not worried about Jossy Mansur, he's got zero credibility in anyone's book. The prosecution has cited him for fabricating evidence.

Let's get back to what you 're talking about as if it were fact Kimberley, which it's not fact, Antonio Carlo, Joran's aruban attorney didn't say anything to the prosecutor that remotely resembles talking about Joran's involvement in Natalee's disappearance. I've spoken to Antonio in the last several days, he said nothing of the sort, he obviously believes in Joran, he represents him in Aruba, as a matter of fact he was in court last thursday on the 30th of November with Karin discussing the closing of this case once and for all. Karin is not bringing this allegation to any court. Antonio never said any such thing so let's not assume it's fact and him losing his law license when he never said anything.

People misstate truth and fact, starting out with that Dr Phil tape that was doctored, starting out with the false confessions that everyone heard were made from the jail by Joran and the Kalpoe brothers that proved to be false, including the false affidavit submitted by Beth Holloway in her lawsuit against Joran in New York by someone who claimed that Joran was a sexual predator. We had an affidavit from that person who said they never said such a thing and that the affidavit submitted before the Court was false ....

So when we start talking about evidence in this case, let's talk about evidence let's not talk about fantasy like I've heard tonight.

Kim

I did ask Jossy why he hasn't come with that tape or the transcript he claims he has of it, why he hasn't given it to the authorities. He said he's going to give it when the case goes to trial, then he will turn it over to the prosecutor's office

Joe:

(inaudible) before the case goes to trial? If he has any real evidence This guy is a buffoon, he's been saying there's a witness from the ..., he's the one who said there was a jogger, he's the one who said there was a gardener, he's lead the police in Aruba on more wild goose chases than any ..

Kim:

Joe, what about Chief Dompig then?

Joe:

I don't know what to make of Chief Dompig, the last thing I heard about Chief Dompig was he got fired because he went on national tv in the United States and said he doesn't believe Joran or the Kalpoe brothers ... are killers and that he believes that Natalee overdosed and killed herself based on excessive narcotics consumption, and then he got fire.

Kim:

There's no evidence to support that whatsoever.

Joe:

Well there's no evidence to support anything else Kimberley you just talk about it as if it were fact. When they get some evidence against Joran, which will never happen because he had nothing to do with her ... then we'll have an intelligent conversation.

Kim:

Alright, well I think everyone wants this case to be solved and whoever is responsible to be put away and punished as they should be for it so I'm all for any information coming forward to see that that happens.
Kim:

Well okay Joe, I just think whoever did this should be put away and punished.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #553 12/3 - 12/4/2006
Post by: klaasend on December 04, 2006, 12:07:14 PM
GLENDA, MF and SCUBAJAP have been noticably silient the last couple days.....wonder why?  :wink:  :lol:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #553 12/3 - 12/4/2006
Post by: justinsmama on December 04, 2006, 12:08:33 PM
Quote from: "klaasend"
GLENDA, MF and SCUBAJAP have been noticably silient the last couple days.....wonder why?  :wink:  :lol:


Convening at the pool side for next lie?


Title: Lively Case Discussion #553 12/3 - 12/4/2006
Post by: klaasend on December 04, 2006, 12:09:44 PM
NEW FRONT PAGE POST:

Watch Joe Tacopina Lose his Mind on Fox … “The Line Up” Discussing Natalee Holloway case


http://www.scaredmonkeys.com/2006/12/04/watch-joe-tacopina-lose-his-mind-on-fox-the-line-up-discussing-natalee-holloway-case/


Title: Lively Case Discussion #553 12/3 - 12/4/2006
Post by: Katysmom on December 04, 2006, 12:10:42 PM
Quote from: "San"
Quote from: "LilPuma"
What's the name of Guido's attorney in The Netherlands?  I can't even find the who's who thread.   :?

I think his last name is Sponge.



Sponge?  What a perfect name for an attorney!


Title: Lively Case Discussion #553 12/3 - 12/4/2006
Post by: blah on December 04, 2006, 12:13:25 PM
Quote from: "klaasend"


<CLIP>

[Joe:

Well there's no evidence to support anything else Kimberley you just talk about it as if it were fact. When they get some evidence against Joran, which will never happen because he had nothing to do with her ... then we'll have an intelligent conversation.

Kim:

Alright, well I think everyone wants this case to be solved and whoever is responsible to be put away and punished as they should be for it so I'm all for any information coming forward to see that that happens.
Kim:

Well okay Joe, I just think whoever did this should be put away and


punished.


klaas, good job.  Looks like Joe admitted that he will never be able to have in intelligent conversation.

That is Signature Line material right there !!


 :lol:  :lol:  :lol:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #553 12/3 - 12/4/2006
Post by: Katysmom on December 04, 2006, 12:17:29 PM
Quote from: "LilPuma"

I think I posted earlier that it was always my opinion that the meeting with JoeT was planned before the van der Sloots got to NY and were served.  I think he was hired to quash the statements being made about Joran and Paulus by discrediting them and threatening to sue people.  Apparently he is still working on that.  The reason I suspect that C&C and the Excelsior are putting up money is obvious - if Joran is found guilty, they are both culpable since Joran should NOT have been in their establishments and if he hadn't been, Natalee would be alive.


LiLPuma:  In the U.S. the establishments would be culpable, but are they in Aruba?  We've seen how Aruba laws work.  I think the higher ups would protect the casinos, afterall, they have a very important part in the money laundering on that little happy island.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #553 12/3 - 12/4/2006
Post by: Katysmom on December 04, 2006, 12:18:36 PM
Quote from: "Hotshot"
testing avatar


How Cute!!  I want a monkey!!!


Title: Lively Case Discussion #553 12/3 - 12/4/2006
Post by: 2NJSons_Mom on December 04, 2006, 12:23:22 PM
Looks like the Bucuti Cam isn't Zooming very well.   :lol:

http://www.bucuticam.com/bucutizoom.html


Title: Lively Case Discussion #553 12/3 - 12/4/2006
Post by: Katysmom on December 04, 2006, 12:24:58 PM
Quote from: "Jacqueline"
Quote from: "Peaches"
Jacqueline, I'd be interested to read the article on TacoJoe.  

Thank you.


http://www.skidmore.edu/scope/winter2003/features/powerplays.html

Here you go...From 2003 on Joe Taco.


 But Tacopina soon realized that he didn’t share his fellow prosecutors’ satisfaction in the work. “When some of the prosecutors won a big case, they would go back to the office and have a party. But to me it wasn’t about that, about winning. It was just sad. First somebody got killed, and now a second life is ruined because he’s going away forever; it would only confirm the tragedy. I never got any joy out of that.”

He was upset because the defendant's life was ruined?? :shock:   I stopped reading the article right there.  That statement alone told me all I need to know about this greasy, scumbag, whiney, lowlife, a** kissing, Joran lover, ohhhhhhh, you know what I mean.[/b]


Title: Lively Case Discussion #553 12/3 - 12/4/2006
Post by: Katysmom on December 04, 2006, 12:26:45 PM
Quote from: "2NJSons_Mom"
Looks like the Bucuti Cam isn't Zooming very well.   :lol:

http://www.bucuticam.com/bucutizoom.html


Wow, that beach is crowed!  (with trees!)


Title: Lively Case Discussion #553 12/3 - 12/4/2006
Post by: the big hammer on December 04, 2006, 12:33:40 PM
Klaas --

Thanks for that transcript --

Tacopina's assertions are mixed up and convoluted.  He dredged up past disagreements re: available evidence/affadavits, etc that only people who are really informed about the case would know.  His generaliztions also missed the mark ("...everybody knows that jossy..., etc..."), and this made him appear to be personally insulting Jossy ( and Beth, too, whom he essentially called a liar ) and he offered nothing to back up his claims.

He came off as argumentative, accusatory, and insulting.  Especially when the show is viewed in entirety: he calls AFTER the Natalee piece appears and ends and host Kimberley has moved to completely different subject.  Tacopina's delivery therefore appears and feels out of context, and unrelated, which adds to the hostile perception he delivers.

Tacopina's on-air performances are deteriorating in quality and credibility.

He was awful last nite and Fox host Kimberley really rubbed his nose in it at the end " we call just want those responsible locked up and punished ..."  

It was obvious who she was referring to...

.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #553 12/3 - 12/4/2006
Post by: Peaches on December 04, 2006, 12:34:15 PM
Thanks for the recap, Klaas.  It's just not as amusing when you can't hear him ranting, his voice getting louder and higher.   The YouTube version is more fun.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #553 12/3 - 12/4/2006
Post by: SunnyinTX on December 04, 2006, 12:35:17 PM
Quote from: "klaasend"
GLENDA, MF and SCUBAJAP have been noticably silient the last couple days.....wonder why?  :wink:  :lol:


I have been trying to catch up on emails and one told me that Glenda/julia had been banned from RU....but has now been allowed to return....if this true it's more than funny!  LOL....anyone know anything about this?


Title: Lively Case Discussion #553 12/3 - 12/4/2006
Post by: klaasend on December 04, 2006, 12:41:00 PM
Quote from: "SunnyinTX"
Quote from: "klaasend"
GLENDA, MF and SCUBAJAP have been noticably silient the last couple days.....wonder why?  :wink:  :lol:


I have been trying to catch up on emails and one told me that Glenda/julia had been banned from RU....but has now been allowed to return....if this true it's more than funny!  LOL....anyone know anything about this?

Yes, I heard the same thing a few weeks ago.  Glenda has been posting at FOB.  MF sometimes posts at RU but mostly at FOB, same with Scubajap.  The three are rarely seen at RU but only at FOB.  

For the past couple days all three have been VERY quiet  :wink:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #553 12/3 - 12/4/2006
Post by: klaasend on December 04, 2006, 12:42:52 PM
Posted by Airgame12 on the front page of SM:

From my lawyer friends, once they stopped laughing at Taco.

He displays the manner of a attorney that knows that he has been duped by his client and that he is in danger of his case crashing down around him. The outburst’s are both part anger because of being duped and knowing that people are laughing at him, and also to try to confuse whom ever might be paying attention. But as we always say, and Chuch Noll said it first in 1976……..Talk is cheap…..empty barrels make the most noise.

Conclusion……Taco is a empty 55 gallon drum!

 :lol:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #553 12/3 - 12/4/2006
Post by: SunnyinTX on December 04, 2006, 12:44:20 PM
Quote from: "klaasend"
Quote from: "SunnyinTX"


I have been trying to catch up on emails and one told me that Glenda/julia had been banned from RU....but has now been allowed to return....if this true it's more than funny!  LOL....anyone know anything about this?

Yes, I heard the same thing a few weeks ago.  Glenda has been posting at FOB.  MF sometimes posts at RU but mostly at FOB, same with Scubajap.  The three are rarely seen at RU but only at FOB.  

For the past couple days all three have been VERY quiet  :wink:


thanks Klass...hearing that almost makes my day!   Very quient huh!  Bet they are wishing they could find a hole to climb into...but most of them must be filled with other degenerates! I also was told you posted a great picture of renfro....the back end of an animal? :D   I'd
 LOVE to see it~  LOL


Title: Lively Case Discussion #553 12/3 - 12/4/2006
Post by: Tylergal on December 04, 2006, 01:12:24 PM
Quote from: "Anna"
Evidently Crazy Joe just called in without being asked to.  Nothing was said about his being on the program until suddenly there he was screaming in the phone, like it was not planned or anticipated??

He has nothing to do with Aruba, only NY so why is he so hysterical about all this?  Oh, for one thing, he promied the sloots to make people stop saying "bad things" (read the truth) about his delinquent client.  Guess he hates it when he is powerless to do that.  

He can't control what people say or what people think or what people know and he might as well get over it.

 :roll:
(http://i15.photobucket.com/albums/a360/AnnaBlueSkies/Greetings/Holidays%20and%20BD/4d66teq_th.gif)(http://i15.photobucket.com/albums/a360/AnnaBlueSkies/Greetings/Holidays%20and%20BD/4d66teq_th.gif)(http://i15.photobucket.com/albums/a360/AnnaBlueSkies/Greetings/Holidays%20and%20BD/4d66teq_th.gif)(http://i15.photobucket.com/albums/a360/AnnaBlueSkies/Greetings/Holidays%20and%20BD/4d66teq_th.gif)


I want to disagree that he called out of whole cloth.  I think it had to be a set-up as a network would refuse his call.  Incidentally this is a program that is prerecorded so it would have had to be a set up between him and the hostess in collusion with the network to have him on.  These programs are not live and do not request call in so obviously someone wanted him on as a rebuttal, probably Kimberly, perhaps JQK who wanted the world to see who the real baffoon really is.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #553 12/3 - 12/4/2006
Post by: Katysmom on December 04, 2006, 01:13:08 PM
my mailbox was just flooded with all this stuff about Natalee.  I haven't opened any of them.  Does anyone know what this is about.  I do know I haven't subscribed to any newsletter.

Susie Que   jerry&MURRAY Alert  Mon Dec 04, 2006 9k
    hardyandtiny   Re: Natalee Holloway Investigation - Edition 2 - Jerry and Murray's Newsletter  Sun Dec 03, 2006 34k
    Debbie   Re: (no subject)  Sun Dec 03, 2006 18k
    murray live   (no subject)  Sun Dec 03, 2006 6k
    murray live   Re: unsubscribe - Dana  Sun Dec 03, 2006 5k
    murray live   Re: unsubscribe - Pam Williams  Sun Dec 03, 2006 7k
    murray live   IMPORTANT: To Debbie and Ian / Team BFN  Sun Dec 03, 2006 6k
    murray live   To Ian - Jerry and Murray Alert  Sun Dec 03, 2006 5k
    murray live   Ian Lies - Jerry and Murray ALERT  Sun Dec 03, 2006 8k
    murray live   Re: Natalee Holloway Investigation - Edition 2 - Jerry and Murray's Newsletter  Sun Dec 03, 2006 20k
    murray live   Natalee Holloway Investigation - Edition 2 - Jerry and Murray's Newsletter  Sun Dec 03, 2006 7k
    murray live   Thankyou for subscribing to Jerry & Murray's Newsletter  Sun Dec 03, 2006 5k


Title: Lively Case Discussion #553 12/3 - 12/4/2006
Post by: Tylergal on December 04, 2006, 01:14:35 PM
Quote from: "Angiex911dsptchr"
Quote from: "LilPuma"
Quote from: "Angiex911dsptchr"
Quote from: "LilPuma"
Just watched the replay of The Lineup and want to make a few points.  

1.  JoeT said, as posted in the transcript above, that Carlo was in court with KJ to discuss the closing of this case ONCE AND FOR ALL.  

2.  Why oh why would Jossy Mansur be expected to give the Prosecutor a tape of the police investigator's statements about the case?  Wouldn't the prosecutor be in a position to know what the police investigator knows or has?  It's just absurd; yet Kimberly and JoeT made a fuss over it.  

3.  Doctored Dr. Phil tapes.  As I posted earlier, if that's the case, someone would have filed suit.  No brainer.  

Fiction and fantasies.  The new title of the thread for Joran's statements.  What a capitalist buffoon you are, JoeT.


 Makes me wonder if Joran confessed to Carlo and Carlo told KJ?


So who orchestrated the retraction of the story about a confession?  Was this confession presented to the Judge?


OMG its been so dang long.. IIRC it was  Rudy Croes who said there was a confession back on June 11th 2005.. it was announced on FOX.. then BOOM.. nothing.. no retraction. Thats been something thats always pissed me off til this day. :(


I think Dompig is the one who addressed the confession and a "brother" of Rudy Croes, via Rudy Croes made the announcement to AP.  Then it was retracted.  One big liar after another liar, lying for their lying liars with all their big lies.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #553 12/3 - 12/4/2006
Post by: Tylergal on December 04, 2006, 01:15:42 PM
Quote from: "LilPuma"
Quote from: "Anna"
Evidently Crazy Joe just called in without being asked to.  Nothing was said about his being on the program until suddenly there he was screaming in the phone, like it was not planned or anticipated??

He has nothing to do with Aruba, only NY so why is he so hysterical about all this?  Oh, for one thing, he promied the sloots to make people stop saying "bad things" (read the truth) about his delinquent client.  Guess he hates it when he is powerless to do that.  

He can't control what people say or what people think or what people know and he might as well get over it.

 :roll:


I think I posted earlier that it was always my opinion that the meeting with JoeT was planned before the van der Sloots got to NY and were served.  I think he was hired to quash the statements being made about Joran and Paulus by discrediting them and threatening to sue people.  Apparently he is still working on that.  The reason I suspect that C&C and the Excelsior are putting up money is obvious - if Joran is found guilty, they are both culpable since Joran should NOT have been in their establishments and if he hadn't been, Natalee would be alive.


I agree.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #553 12/3 - 12/4/2006
Post by: MisGivings on December 04, 2006, 01:18:15 PM
Quote from: "klaasend"
GLENDA, MF and SCUBAJAP have been noticably silient the last couple days.....wonder why?  :wink:  :lol:



I don't know, but I did manage to find a childhood picture of SandraKrazy with her Mother;
(http://i33.photobucket.com/albums/d83/misgivings/Iknewtherewasabook.jpg?t=1165256870)


Title: Lively Case Discussion #553 12/3 - 12/4/2006
Post by: Tylergal on December 04, 2006, 01:19:25 PM
Quote from: "Angiex911dsptchr"
Carnut.. I know of others  who feel the same as you do..
Do you think this is just a ruse? and using this for an excuse that they wouldnt go near a female?   See IMO I think Guido looks like hes a bit light in the loafers,. I know looks dont mean chit.. and I think about what None says about Dutchladys findings about the gay thingy  with Joran?
 I guess I am curious as to why you feel they arnt in a realtioinship together?


When I purused porn and gay sights that one of our respected Aruban posters frequented, by following the ISP, I found a big group hug for Joran at the European gay sites.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #553 12/3 - 12/4/2006
Post by: Ono on December 04, 2006, 01:22:01 PM
Quote from: "Tylergal"
Oh, yes, and he said the documents that Beth submitted in New York were lies, the reason the case was thrown out.  Now we all know who the liar is here, it's Joe.  That was not the reason the case was thrown out.  After rewatching this, I think I know why John Q Kelly let Beth go on by herself.  He was baiting old Crazy Joe.  I would say Beth has grounds for a law suit right there when he accuses her on TV of submitting false documents to a court.  Since he is now "Joran's attorney for all times, everywhere," I would think Beth would not only be able to sue Joe but Aruba, KJ, etc., as well.


I would think so too, Tyler. :D  Things are getting juicey and very interesting!
Many thanks to all who transcribed...I missed 3/4 of the show.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #553 12/3 - 12/4/2006
Post by: Tylergal on December 04, 2006, 01:22:21 PM
Quote from: "Angiex911dsptchr"
Quote from: "carpe noctem"
Hi Angie!!!

 :lol:

(http://i76.photobucket.com/albums/j32/carpehumor/JoranfagJpeg.jpg)


  ROFLMAO!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!  Love your pics Carpe :) :) :)
Guess Im still wide awake  yet..


Carpe, thanks for sharing this once again.  After seeing this in close-up today, I have decided that Joran's lazy eye is more like "crazy eye."  He really looks like some kind of crazed person with that "frightening lazy eye."  Scary, to say the least.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #553 12/3 - 12/4/2006
Post by: MisGivings on December 04, 2006, 01:23:15 PM
Quote from: MisGivings
Quote from: "klaasend"
GLENDA, MF and SCUBAJAP have been noticably silient the last couple days.....wonder why?  :wink:  :lol:



I don't know, but I did manage to find a childhood picture of SandraKrazy with her Mother;
(http://s33.photobucket.com/albums/d83/misgivings/th_Iknewtherewasabook22.jpg)


Title: Lively Case Discussion #553 12/3 - 12/4/2006
Post by: Tylergal on December 04, 2006, 01:27:06 PM
Quote from: "carpe noctem"
Thanks Bleached!

Here is something I picked up...


A death at Carlos & Charlies??? Any Papiamento
speakers?

 :?:  :?:  :?:

(http://i98.photobucket.com/albums/l266/californialighthousepics1/dec42006.png)


Hmmm, that looks like someone that might know something and got in the way of the lies from Aruba.  Then the "supposed" (accused) perpetrator kills himself.  I think not.  This is Lee Harvey Oswald and Jack Ruby all over again!  Someone silenced this kid and the guy who was the perpetrator (set up from the get go).  This just screams ARUBAN JUSTICE.  No warm bodies, no truth.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #553 12/3 - 12/4/2006
Post by: Ono on December 04, 2006, 01:31:29 PM
Quote from: "carpe noctem"
any thoughts about WHISKEY JOE and his hysterical rant on THE LINE UP?


He had just realized that he was onboard the Titanic. :lol:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #553 12/3 - 12/4/2006
Post by: Tylergal on December 04, 2006, 01:34:36 PM
Quote from: "Peaches"
Quote from: "robots"
JOE skkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkeeeeeeeerrrrrred his DOGS

 :lol:  :lol:  :lol:  :lol:


I hope the barking dogs didn't scare his poor children!


To me, this sounds like dogs that are scared of their master, who probably pitches fits like this with his wife and children and the dogs are voicing their disapproval.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #553 12/3 - 12/4/2006
Post by: Tylergal on December 04, 2006, 01:35:59 PM
Quote from: "Peaches"
BT, it's Monday morning.  I feel as good as anyone does on a Monday morning.  Seriously, the bone pain has backed off a little and I can feel bad at the office as easy as I can at home.  

I missed the Taco Joe extravaganza last nite.  I think my Lunesta heard him coming...............Thank goodness for YouTube!  Now I can listen to his tantrum anytime I want!


Take care of yourself, Peaches.  I am glad to know you feel like going to work but do take care.  Hugs to you.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #553 12/3 - 12/4/2006
Post by: Tylergal on December 04, 2006, 01:37:06 PM
Quote from: "SunnyinTX"
Good Morning Monks.

I have been away for a while and missed y'all....I caught the show last night....Taco is an idiot!!  I am going to go and read and try to get caught up....I hope everyone is well....and I hope this is the break that is needed to bring JUSTICE FOR NATALEE


Good to have you back.  I am hoping you are feeling much, much better.  Hugs to you, Sunny.  We have missed our monkeys.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #553 12/3 - 12/4/2006
Post by: Tylergal on December 04, 2006, 01:39:30 PM
Quote from: "Nut44x4"
Quote from: "Anna"
Well, Carnut,
Girls don't die from orgasms but people do have homosexual or bisexual realtionships all the time.  I also don't want the Dutch to think I am above smearing their man Joran just as they try to do Natalee constantly.  Dutch don't have any problem with homosexuality and do recognize same sex marriage and all the rest.

I just don't put much of anything as beneath these young thugs and also don't have any interest in protecting Joran's reputation.

But perhaps we will learn more of this sordid affair later as I don't think we have heard the last about Giudo.


Goodnight all!



(http://i15.photobucket.com/albums/a360/AnnaBlueSkies/Greetings/Holidays%20and%20BD/ththxmasb3ar1135419231.gif)




Lmao @ dying from an orgasm....what a way to go...sorry, lol. I can't help myself.


Although it might sound funny, to have seen that proposed as a hypothetical back in July 2005 was not very funny.  In fact, it was maddening that the idiots Harry Tho and Dan Riehl proposed that as an excuse for Joran killing Natalee.  Just like Robots, I hate all of them.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #553 12/3 - 12/4/2006
Post by: Tylergal on December 04, 2006, 01:41:40 PM
Quote from: "klaasend"
From another site.  According to the Diario article today, Freddy Arambatzis also claims in a statement that Carlo was almost crying saying Joran needs to tell the truth.


Great find, Klaas.  But what else do I expect from you. :lol:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #553 12/3 - 12/4/2006
Post by: Peaches on December 04, 2006, 01:42:19 PM
Quote from: "Tylergal"
Quote from: "Peaches"
BT, it's Monday morning.  I feel as good as anyone does on a Monday morning.  Seriously, the bone pain has backed off a little and I can feel bad at the office as easy as I can at home.  

I missed the Taco Joe extravaganza last nite.  I think my Lunesta heard him coming...............Thank goodness for YouTube!  Now I can listen to his tantrum anytime I want!


Take care of yourself, Peaches.  I am glad to know you feel like going to work but do take care.  Hugs to you.


It's not that I feel like going to the office.  They just don't pay me if I don't show up!  Some days I feel better than others just like everyone else.  You doing okay over there?  Your lovely rose avatar is still my background here at work.  Such a pretty sight any day of the week!


Title: Lively Case Discussion #553 12/3 - 12/4/2006
Post by: Tylergal on December 04, 2006, 01:46:18 PM
Quote from: "San"
According to these statements we have confirmation that Joran was in fact driving the Kalpoe car.  Another lie he told on Greta.


I was told earlier in the case that Joran was driving the Deepak car and have always been told there was no proof but someone from Aruba did tell me that, the person who I do not know who was, but kept sending my DH e-mail outlining things about the case and the involvement of employees of the HI.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #553 12/3 - 12/4/2006
Post by: Ono on December 04, 2006, 01:51:21 PM
Quote from: "San"
What I would like to know is how Tacopina would know first hand that Gerald Dompig was fired.  He is admitting right there that the ALE and government are keeping him informed on what is going on with the coverup.

Can you hear it now "OK Joe we took care of the Dompig issue what do you want us to do next". :roll:


Yes, that's interesting about the "firing" part, as remember, when Dompig was relieved of his duties, it was presented as a career move of sorts for him, but we all figured Dompig's 'ye olde career move' was really because we all had just seen him all over FOX, etc. stating  that  "Joran & K2 were guilty as hell" ?? :lol:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #553 12/3 - 12/4/2006
Post by: Ono on December 04, 2006, 01:54:35 PM
Quote from: "klaasend"
GLENDA, MF and SCUBAJAP have been noticably silient the last couple days.....wonder why?  :wink:  :lol:


They're out Christmas shopping ?????????? :lol:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #553 12/3 - 12/4/2006
Post by: Tylergal on December 04, 2006, 02:06:50 PM
Quote from: "Peaches"
Quote from: "San"
What I would like to know is how Tacopina would know first hand that Gerald Dompig was fired.  He is admitting right there that the ALE and government are keeping him informed on what is going on with the coverup.

Can you hear it now "OK Joe we took care of the Dompig issue what do you want us to do next". :roll:


I can't imagine that Taco Joe has so ingratiated himself with Aruba that they are now telling him all their secrets.   Dompig's work status is hardly Taco's business.


Johnny Cochran was a big Arubanese fan.  It is my understanding that he and Oprah owned a lot of property there together.  That's from someone who once was involved with commercial real estate there, and who said that Cochran was viewed as a hero on one sleazy island.  Perhaps, Taco is trying to match Cochran.  Maybe he will, just maybe he will --- I am thinking daisies and push-ups.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #553 12/3 - 12/4/2006
Post by: Tylergal on December 04, 2006, 02:09:43 PM
Quote from: "Peaches"
Quote from: "San"
Quote from: "Peaches"
Quote from: "San"
What I would like to know is how Tacopina would know first hand that Gerald Dompig was fired.  He is admitting right there that the ALE and government are keeping him informed on what is going on with the coverup.

Can you hear it now "OK Joe we took care of the Dompig issue what do you want us to do next". :roll:


I can't imagine that Taco Joe has so ingratiated himself with Aruba that they are now telling him all their secrets.   Dompig's work status is hardly Taco's business.

I agree Peaches but this was the first time that I heard that Gerald Dompig was fired.


I thought he just found his calling and headed off to medical school.   :roll:  :roll:  :roll:


Perhaps it was just a suggestion that he take a con-ed course at medical school, from Dr. Baden, because he obviously does not know enough regards the medical field to be making these statements (lies) on public TV.  I would imagine Dr. Baden saying, "you need to go to medical school" while rolling his eyes and Dompig taking that to be the gospel and went out and applied.  Wonder if he could even get accepted to med school in Mexico?


Title: Lively Case Discussion #553 12/3 - 12/4/2006
Post by: Tylergal on December 04, 2006, 02:10:38 PM
Quote from: "blah"
Quote from: "klaasend"
From another site.  According to the Diario article today, Freddy Arambatzis also claims in a statement that Carlo was almost crying saying Joran needs to tell the truth.



Sounds to me like any good cop would be able to make Carlo crack and spill the beans.  Dont they have laws that lwyers cannot LIE for their clients?  Maybe they need to threaten some action against Carlo to get him to spill it !!


Laws in Aruba?   :lol:  :lol:  :lol:  I thought would die.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #553 12/3 - 12/4/2006
Post by: Tylergal on December 04, 2006, 02:11:58 PM
Quote from: "klaasend"
GLENDA, MF and SCUBAJAP have been noticably silient the last couple days.....wonder why?  :wink:  :lol:


Maybe they have not gotten the high sign from Joe or Paulus to proceed. :wink:  :wink:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #553 12/3 - 12/4/2006
Post by: Sue on December 04, 2006, 02:14:55 PM
Quote from: "Katysmom"
my mailbox was just flooded with all this stuff about Natalee.  I haven't opened any of them.  Does anyone know what this is about.  I do know I haven't subscribed to any newsletter.

Susie Que   jerry&MURRAY Alert  Mon Dec 04, 2006 9k
    hardyandtiny   Re: Natalee Holloway Investigation - Edition 2 - Jerry and Murray's Newsletter  Sun Dec 03, 2006 34k
    Debbie   Re: (no subject)  Sun Dec 03, 2006 18k
    murray live   (no subject)  Sun Dec 03, 2006 6k
    murray live   Re: unsubscribe - Dana  Sun Dec 03, 2006 5k
    murray live   Re: unsubscribe - Pam Williams  Sun Dec 03, 2006 7k
    murray live   IMPORTANT: To Debbie and Ian / Team BFN  Sun Dec 03, 2006 6k
    murray live   To Ian - Jerry and Murray Alert  Sun Dec 03, 2006 5k
    murray live   Ian Lies - Jerry and Murray ALERT  Sun Dec 03, 2006 8k
    murray live   Re: Natalee Holloway Investigation - Edition 2 - Jerry and Murray's Newsletter  Sun Dec 03, 2006 20k
    murray live   Natalee Holloway Investigation - Edition 2 - Jerry and Murray's Newsletter  Sun Dec 03, 2006 7k
    murray live   Thankyou for subscribing to Jerry & Murray's Newsletter  Sun Dec 03, 2006 5k


THIS GUY WAS A TOTAL NUT CASE FROM BFN CHAT  and i mean a NUTTER


Title: Lively Case Discussion #553 12/3 - 12/4/2006
Post by: Tylergal on December 04, 2006, 02:20:11 PM
Okay, I am talking to myself so I will go put out some more Christmas decorations, order some more gifts and check back later.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #553 12/3 - 12/4/2006
Post by: Katysmom on December 04, 2006, 02:20:56 PM
Quote from: "Sue"
Quote from: "Katysmom"
my mailbox was just flooded with all this stuff about Natalee.  I haven't opened any of them.  Does anyone know what this is about.  I do know I haven't subscribed to any newsletter.

Susie Que   jerry&MURRAY Alert  Mon Dec 04, 2006 9k
    hardyandtiny   Re: Natalee Holloway Investigation - Edition 2 - Jerry and Murray's Newsletter  Sun Dec 03, 2006 34k
    Debbie   Re: (no subject)  Sun Dec 03, 2006 18k
    murray live   (no subject)  Sun Dec 03, 2006 6k
    murray live   Re: unsubscribe - Dana  Sun Dec 03, 2006 5k
    murray live   Re: unsubscribe - Pam Williams  Sun Dec 03, 2006 7k
    murray live   IMPORTANT: To Debbie and Ian / Team BFN  Sun Dec 03, 2006 6k
    murray live   To Ian - Jerry and Murray Alert  Sun Dec 03, 2006 5k
    murray live   Ian Lies - Jerry and Murray ALERT  Sun Dec 03, 2006 8k
    murray live   Re: Natalee Holloway Investigation - Edition 2 - Jerry and Murray's Newsletter  Sun Dec 03, 2006 20k
    murray live   Natalee Holloway Investigation - Edition 2 - Jerry and Murray's Newsletter  Sun Dec 03, 2006 7k
    murray live   Thankyou for subscribing to Jerry & Murray's Newsletter  Sun Dec 03, 2006 5k


THIS GUY WAS A TOTAL NUT CASE FROM BFN CHAT  and i mean a NUTTER


Oh Yeah!  I opened one and he told me if I sent him my bank account info and ss# he would send me a million dollars!!  Do I look that stupid?? :shock:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #553 12/3 - 12/4/2006
Post by: Jacqueline on December 04, 2006, 02:30:55 PM
Quote from: "Tylergal"
Quote from: "Angiex911dsptchr"
Quote from: "carpe noctem"
Hi Angie!!!

 :lol:

(http://i76.photobucket.com/albums/j32/carpehumor/JoranfagJpeg.jpg)


  ROFLMAO!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!  Love your pics Carpe :) :) :)
Guess Im still wide awake  yet..


Carpe, thanks for sharing this once again.  After seeing this in close-up today, I have decided that Joran's lazy eye is more like "crazy eye."  He really looks like some kind of crazed person with that "frightening lazy eye."  Scary, to say the least.


I hate this picture more every time I see it..

Look at that crazed look...

He's crazed.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #553 12/3 - 12/4/2006
Post by: San on December 04, 2006, 02:49:58 PM
Quote from: "Jacqueline"
Quote from: "Tylergal"
Quote from: "Angiex911dsptchr"
Quote from: "carpe noctem"
Hi Angie!!!

 :lol:

(http://i76.photobucket.com/albums/j32/carpehumor/JoranfagJpeg.jpg)


  ROFLMAO!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!  Love your pics Carpe :) :) :)
Guess Im still wide awake  yet..


Carpe, thanks for sharing this once again.  After seeing this in close-up today, I have decided that Joran's lazy eye is more like "crazy eye."  He really looks like some kind of crazed person with that "frightening lazy eye."  Scary, to say the least.


I hate this picture more every time I see it..

Look at that crazed look...

He's crazed.

 :lol: I hate this picture also.  He is nuts.  I hate to even think of what he did to Natalee.  Anyone who hangs out with him is not in their right mind.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #553 12/3 - 12/4/2006
Post by: Dana on December 04, 2006, 02:50:14 PM
Quote from: "Katysmom"
my mailbox was just flooded with all this stuff about Natalee.  I haven't opened any of them.  Does anyone know what this is about.  I do know I haven't subscribed to any newsletter.

Susie Que   jerry&MURRAY Alert  Mon Dec 04, 2006 9k
    hardyandtiny   Re: Natalee Holloway Investigation - Edition 2 - Jerry and Murray's Newsletter  Sun Dec 03, 2006 34k
    Debbie   Re: (no subject)  Sun Dec 03, 2006 18k
    murray live   (no subject)  Sun Dec 03, 2006 6k
    murray live   Re: unsubscribe - Dana  Sun Dec 03, 2006 5k
    murray live   Re: unsubscribe - Pam Williams  Sun Dec 03, 2006 7k
    murray live   IMPORTANT: To Debbie and Ian / Team BFN  Sun Dec 03, 2006 6k
    murray live   To Ian - Jerry and Murray Alert  Sun Dec 03, 2006 5k
    murray live   Ian Lies - Jerry and Murray ALERT  Sun Dec 03, 2006 8k
    murray live   Re: Natalee Holloway Investigation - Edition 2 - Jerry and Murray's Newsletter  Sun Dec 03, 2006 20k
    murray live   Natalee Holloway Investigation - Edition 2 - Jerry and Murray's Newsletter  Sun Dec 03, 2006 7k
    murray live   Thankyou for subscribing to Jerry & Murray's Newsletter  Sun Dec 03, 2006 5k


yes mine too, ive been having a hell of a time trying to block it.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #553 12/3 - 12/4/2006
Post by: robots on December 04, 2006, 02:54:26 PM
i think the only one in the world that finds joran delicious is
JOE TACOPINHEAD


mmmm..mmmmmmmmm


YUCK

JOE IS GROSS

JORAN is GROSS

PAULUS is GROSS


3 greasy PIGS


ohhhhhhhhhhh..NOooooooooooooooooooooooooo



please dont sue me JOE...please DONT  :twisted:  :twisted:  :twisted:  :twisted:

you are a HACK


here is my impersonation of JOE



"WAHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHH"



 :twisted:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #553 12/3 - 12/4/2006
Post by: Katysmom on December 04, 2006, 02:55:10 PM
Quote from: "Dana"
Quote from: "Katysmom"
my mailbox was just flooded with all this stuff about Natalee.  I haven't opened any of them.  Does anyone know what this is about.  I do know I haven't subscribed to any newsletter.

Susie Que   jerry&MURRAY Alert  Mon Dec 04, 2006 9k
    hardyandtiny   Re: Natalee Holloway Investigation - Edition 2 - Jerry and Murray's Newsletter  Sun Dec 03, 2006 34k
    Debbie   Re: (no subject)  Sun Dec 03, 2006 18k
    murray live   (no subject)  Sun Dec 03, 2006 6k
    murray live   Re: unsubscribe - Dana  Sun Dec 03, 2006 5k
    murray live   Re: unsubscribe - Pam Williams  Sun Dec 03, 2006 7k
    murray live   IMPORTANT: To Debbie and Ian / Team BFN  Sun Dec 03, 2006 6k
    murray live   To Ian - Jerry and Murray Alert  Sun Dec 03, 2006 5k
    murray live   Ian Lies - Jerry and Murray ALERT  Sun Dec 03, 2006 8k
    murray live   Re: Natalee Holloway Investigation - Edition 2 - Jerry and Murray's Newsletter  Sun Dec 03, 2006 20k
    murray live   Natalee Holloway Investigation - Edition 2 - Jerry and Murray's Newsletter  Sun Dec 03, 2006 7k
    murray live   Thankyou for subscribing to Jerry & Murray's Newsletter  Sun Dec 03, 2006 5k


yes mine too, ive been having a hell of a time trying to block it.


I had to ban Susie Q, too.  If you have a yahoo account, check the boxes next to the email and hit the 'spam' button.  I get tons of spam sent to my yahoo addresses and absolutely zero in my excite.com address


Title: Lively Case Discussion #553 12/3 - 12/4/2006
Post by: Sue on December 04, 2006, 02:58:47 PM
Quote from: "Dana"
Quote from: "Katysmom"
my mailbox was just flooded with all this stuff about Natalee.  I haven't opened any of them.  Does anyone know what this is about.  I do know I haven't subscribed to any newsletter.

Susie Que   jerry&MURRAY Alert  Mon Dec 04, 2006 9k
    hardyandtiny   Re: Natalee Holloway Investigation - Edition 2 - Jerry and Murray's Newsletter  Sun Dec 03, 2006 34k
    Debbie   Re: (no subject)  Sun Dec 03, 2006 18k
    murray live   (no subject)  Sun Dec 03, 2006 6k
    murray live   Re: unsubscribe - Dana  Sun Dec 03, 2006 5k
    murray live   Re: unsubscribe - Pam Williams  Sun Dec 03, 2006 7k
    murray live   IMPORTANT: To Debbie and Ian / Team BFN  Sun Dec 03, 2006 6k
    murray live   To Ian - Jerry and Murray Alert  Sun Dec 03, 2006 5k
    murray live   Ian Lies - Jerry and Murray ALERT  Sun Dec 03, 2006 8k
    murray live   Re: Natalee Holloway Investigation - Edition 2 - Jerry and Murray's Newsletter  Sun Dec 03, 2006 20k
    murray live   Natalee Holloway Investigation - Edition 2 - Jerry and Murray's Newsletter  Sun Dec 03, 2006 7k
    murray live   Thankyou for subscribing to Jerry & Murray's Newsletter  Sun Dec 03, 2006 5k


yes mine too, ive been having a hell of a time trying to block it.


Dana,
Jerry was a TOTAL nut case from BFN.. he use to come to the chat room and was banned for his strange behavior some at BFN think that he also a poster that goes by the name Scars claiming he saw the murder through Natalee's eyes.. HE IS JUST twisted


Title: Lively Case Discussion #553 12/3 - 12/4/2006
Post by: Jacqueline on December 04, 2006, 02:59:25 PM
Quote from: "robots"
i think the only one in the world that finds joran delicious is
JOE TACOPINHEAD


mmmm..mmmmmmmmm


YUCK

JOE IS GROSS

JORAN is GROSS

PAULUS is GROSS


3 greasy PIGS


ohhhhhhhhhhh..NOooooooooooooooooooooooooo



please dont sue me JOE...please DONT  :twisted:  :twisted:  :twisted:  :twisted:

you are a HACK


here is my impersonation of JOE



"WAHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHH"



 :twisted:


My imitation sounds like this:





(forgot to mention only dogs can hear whines that high!  :wink: )


Title: Lively Case Discussion #553 12/3 - 12/4/2006
Post by: SunnyinTX on December 04, 2006, 03:07:02 PM
Quote from: "Tylergal"


Johnny Cochran was a big Arubanese fan.  It is my understanding that he and Oprah owned a lot of property there together.  That's from someone who once was involved with commercial real estate there, and who said that Cochran was viewed as a hero on one sleazy island.  Perhaps, Taco is trying to match Cochran.  Maybe he will, just maybe he will --- I am thinking daisies and push-ups.


Hi Tyler...I had heard the same about cochran and Oprah but didnt know if it was merely gossip!  Glad to learn you heard it as well. I also heard that because of Oprah's financial stake in the island she wouldn't have anymore shows about Natalee or anything derogatory about aruba and since there's nothing GOOD to say about aruba...ya don't hear nuttin'  about aruba on  Oprah :shock:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #553 12/3 - 12/4/2006
Post by: SunnyinTX on December 04, 2006, 03:08:07 PM
Quote from: "Tylergal"
Quote from: "blah"



Sounds to me like any good cop would be able to make Carlo crack and spill the beans.  Dont they have laws that lwyers cannot LIE for their clients?  Maybe they need to threaten some action against Carlo to get him to spill it !!


Laws in Aruba?   :lol:  :lol:  :lol:  I thought would die.


Isn't that an oxymoron?? :wink:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #553 12/3 - 12/4/2006
Post by: SunnyinTX on December 04, 2006, 03:09:21 PM
Quote from: "Tylergal"
Okay, I am talking to myself so I will go put out some more Christmas decorations, order some more gifts and check back later.


hi Tyler...I thought I had chased everyone away...so I went and had lunch!!


Title: Lively Case Discussion #553 12/3 - 12/4/2006
Post by: Dana on December 04, 2006, 03:09:38 PM
Quote from: "Sue"
Quote from: "Dana"
Quote from: "Katysmom"
my mailbox was just flooded with all this stuff about Natalee.  I haven't opened any of them.  Does anyone know what this is about.  I do know I haven't subscribed to any newsletter.

Susie Que   jerry&MURRAY Alert  Mon Dec 04, 2006 9k
    hardyandtiny   Re: Natalee Holloway Investigation - Edition 2 - Jerry and Murray's Newsletter  Sun Dec 03, 2006 34k
    Debbie   Re: (no subject)  Sun Dec 03, 2006 18k
    murray live   (no subject)  Sun Dec 03, 2006 6k
    murray live   Re: unsubscribe - Dana  Sun Dec 03, 2006 5k
    murray live   Re: unsubscribe - Pam Williams  Sun Dec 03, 2006 7k
    murray live   IMPORTANT: To Debbie and Ian / Team BFN  Sun Dec 03, 2006 6k
    murray live   To Ian - Jerry and Murray Alert  Sun Dec 03, 2006 5k
    murray live   Ian Lies - Jerry and Murray ALERT  Sun Dec 03, 2006 8k
    murray live   Re: Natalee Holloway Investigation - Edition 2 - Jerry and Murray's Newsletter  Sun Dec 03, 2006 20k
    murray live   Natalee Holloway Investigation - Edition 2 - Jerry and Murray's Newsletter  Sun Dec 03, 2006 7k
    murray live   Thankyou for subscribing to Jerry & Murray's Newsletter  Sun Dec 03, 2006 5k


yes mine too, ive been having a hell of a time trying to block it.


Dana,
Jerry was a TOTAL nut case from BFN.. he use to come to the chat room and was banned for his strange behavior some at BFN think that he also a poster that goes by the name Scars claiming he saw the murder through Natalee's eyes.. HE IS JUST twisted



oh ok, but how the hell did he get all of our email addresses.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #553 12/3 - 12/4/2006
Post by: Sue on December 04, 2006, 03:11:56 PM
Quote from: "Dana"
Quote from: "Sue"
Quote from: "Dana"
Quote from: "Katysmom"
my mailbox was just flooded with all this stuff about Natalee.  I haven't opened any of them.  Does anyone know what this is about.  I do know I haven't subscribed to any newsletter.

Susie Que   jerry&MURRAY Alert  Mon Dec 04, 2006 9k
    hardyandtiny   Re: Natalee Holloway Investigation - Edition 2 - Jerry and Murray's Newsletter  Sun Dec 03, 2006 34k
    Debbie   Re: (no subject)  Sun Dec 03, 2006 18k
    murray live   (no subject)  Sun Dec 03, 2006 6k
    murray live   Re: unsubscribe - Dana  Sun Dec 03, 2006 5k
    murray live   Re: unsubscribe - Pam Williams  Sun Dec 03, 2006 7k
    murray live   IMPORTANT: To Debbie and Ian / Team BFN  Sun Dec 03, 2006 6k
    murray live   To Ian - Jerry and Murray Alert  Sun Dec 03, 2006 5k
    murray live   Ian Lies - Jerry and Murray ALERT  Sun Dec 03, 2006 8k
    murray live   Re: Natalee Holloway Investigation - Edition 2 - Jerry and Murray's Newsletter  Sun Dec 03, 2006 20k
    murray live   Natalee Holloway Investigation - Edition 2 - Jerry and Murray's Newsletter  Sun Dec 03, 2006 7k
    murray live   Thankyou for subscribing to Jerry & Murray's Newsletter  Sun Dec 03, 2006 5k


yes mine too, ive been having a hell of a time trying to block it.


Dana,
Jerry was a TOTAL nut case from BFN.. he use to come to the chat room and was banned for his strange behavior some at BFN think that he also a poster that goes by the name Scars claiming he saw the murder through Natalee's eyes.. HE IS JUST twisted



oh ok, but how the hell did he get all of our email addresses.


your web site maybe


Title: Lively Case Discussion #553 12/3 - 12/4/2006
Post by: SunnyinTX on December 04, 2006, 03:12:21 PM
Quote from: "Jacqueline"




He's crazed.


I second that...and he is going to get more and more dangerous. He feels he has pulled off the perfect crime...well when you have police and judges covering and lying for you....but e is going to do it again.....if he isn't  tried for at least RAPE...he will kill again


Title: Lively Case Discussion #553 12/3 - 12/4/2006
Post by: Katysmom on December 04, 2006, 03:12:32 PM
Quote from: "Dana"
Quote from: "Sue"
Quote from: "Dana"
Quote from: "Katysmom"
my mailbox was just flooded with all this stuff about Natalee.  I haven't opened any of them.  Does anyone know what this is about.  I do know I haven't subscribed to any newsletter.

Susie Que   jerry&MURRAY Alert  Mon Dec 04, 2006 9k
    hardyandtiny   Re: Natalee Holloway Investigation - Edition 2 - Jerry and Murray's Newsletter  Sun Dec 03, 2006 34k
    Debbie   Re: (no subject)  Sun Dec 03, 2006 18k
    murray live   (no subject)  Sun Dec 03, 2006 6k
    murray live   Re: unsubscribe - Dana  Sun Dec 03, 2006 5k
    murray live   Re: unsubscribe - Pam Williams  Sun Dec 03, 2006 7k
    murray live   IMPORTANT: To Debbie and Ian / Team BFN  Sun Dec 03, 2006 6k
    murray live   To Ian - Jerry and Murray Alert  Sun Dec 03, 2006 5k
    murray live   Ian Lies - Jerry and Murray ALERT  Sun Dec 03, 2006 8k
    murray live   Re: Natalee Holloway Investigation - Edition 2 - Jerry and Murray's Newsletter  Sun Dec 03, 2006 20k
    murray live   Natalee Holloway Investigation - Edition 2 - Jerry and Murray's Newsletter  Sun Dec 03, 2006 7k
    murray live   Thankyou for subscribing to Jerry & Murray's Newsletter  Sun Dec 03, 2006 5k


yes mine too, ive been having a hell of a time trying to block it.


Dana,
Jerry was a TOTAL nut case from BFN.. he use to come to the chat room and was banned for his strange behavior some at BFN think that he also a poster that goes by the name Scars claiming he saw the murder through Natalee's eyes.. HE IS JUST twisted


oh ok, but how the hell did he get all of our email addresses.


Debbie at BFN started a thread on these emails.  He went in to everyone's profile and copied their addresses.  I immediately went in and changed my email address to private.  Are you registered at BFN?  Maybe he's making the rounds to all the Natalee forums.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #553 12/3 - 12/4/2006
Post by: SunnyinTX on December 04, 2006, 03:13:26 PM
Quote from: "robots"
i think the only one in the world that finds joran delicious is
JOE TACOPINHEAD


mmmm..mmmmmmmmm


YUCK

JOE IS GROSS

JORAN is GROSS

PAULUS is GROSS


3 greasy PIGS


ohhhhhhhhhhh..NOooooooooooooooooooooooooo



please dont sue me JOE...please DONT  :twisted:  :twisted:  :twisted:  :twisted:

you are a HACK
here is my impersonation of JOE

"WAHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHH"

 :twisted:


Robots thanks for making me laugh out loud!  LOL


Title: Lively Case Discussion #553 12/3 - 12/4/2006
Post by: Dana on December 04, 2006, 03:13:37 PM
Quote from: "Katysmom"
Quote from: "Dana"
Quote from: "Sue"
Quote from: "Dana"
Quote from: "Katysmom"
my mailbox was just flooded with all this stuff about Natalee.  I haven't opened any of them.  Does anyone know what this is about.  I do know I haven't subscribed to any newsletter.

Susie Que   jerry&MURRAY Alert  Mon Dec 04, 2006 9k
    hardyandtiny   Re: Natalee Holloway Investigation - Edition 2 - Jerry and Murray's Newsletter  Sun Dec 03, 2006 34k
    Debbie   Re: (no subject)  Sun Dec 03, 2006 18k
    murray live   (no subject)  Sun Dec 03, 2006 6k
    murray live   Re: unsubscribe - Dana  Sun Dec 03, 2006 5k
    murray live   Re: unsubscribe - Pam Williams  Sun Dec 03, 2006 7k
    murray live   IMPORTANT: To Debbie and Ian / Team BFN  Sun Dec 03, 2006 6k
    murray live   To Ian - Jerry and Murray Alert  Sun Dec 03, 2006 5k
    murray live   Ian Lies - Jerry and Murray ALERT  Sun Dec 03, 2006 8k
    murray live   Re: Natalee Holloway Investigation - Edition 2 - Jerry and Murray's Newsletter  Sun Dec 03, 2006 20k
    murray live   Natalee Holloway Investigation - Edition 2 - Jerry and Murray's Newsletter  Sun Dec 03, 2006 7k
    murray live   Thankyou for subscribing to Jerry & Murray's Newsletter  Sun Dec 03, 2006 5k


yes mine too, ive been having a hell of a time trying to block it.


Dana,
Jerry was a TOTAL nut case from BFN.. he use to come to the chat room and was banned for his strange behavior some at BFN think that he also a poster that goes by the name Scars claiming he saw the murder through Natalee's eyes.. HE IS JUST twisted


oh ok, but how the hell did he get all of our email addresses.


Debbie at BFN started a thread on these emails.  He went in to everyone's profile and copied their addresses.  I immediately went in and changed my email address to private.  Are you registered at BFN?  Maybe he's making the rounds to all the Natalee forums.


ok i wondered about that
thanks for the information


Title: Lively Case Discussion #553 12/3 - 12/4/2006
Post by: klaasend on December 04, 2006, 03:14:29 PM
DANA - At Blogs for Natalee in your profile you have the option to set your email to private, yours is not private at BFN.  Mine is private at BFN and I have not received any of the wierd emails.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #553 12/3 - 12/4/2006
Post by: Tylergal on December 04, 2006, 03:17:39 PM
Quote from: "SunnyinTX"
Quote from: "Tylergal"


Johnny Cochran was a big Arubanese fan.  It is my understanding that he and Oprah owned a lot of property there together.  That's from someone who once was involved with commercial real estate there, and who said that Cochran was viewed as a hero on one sleazy island.  Perhaps, Taco is trying to match Cochran.  Maybe he will, just maybe he will --- I am thinking daisies and push-ups.


Hi Tyler...I had heard the same about cochran and Oprah but didnt know if it was merely gossip!  Glad to learn you heard it as well. I also heard that because of Oprah's financial stake in the island she wouldn't have anymore shows about Natalee or anything derogatory about aruba and since there's nothing GOOD to say about aruba...ya don't hear nuttin'  about aruba on  Oprah :shock:


Yep, dear old two-faced capitalist Oprah, who has not a bone in her body that is not yearning for money.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #553 12/3 - 12/4/2006
Post by: Tylergal on December 04, 2006, 03:18:27 PM
Quote from: "Sue"
Quote from: "Dana"
Quote from: "Sue"
Quote from: "Dana"
Quote from: "Katysmom"
my mailbox was just flooded with all this stuff about Natalee.  I haven't opened any of them.  Does anyone know what this is about.  I do know I haven't subscribed to any newsletter.

Susie Que   jerry&MURRAY Alert  Mon Dec 04, 2006 9k
    hardyandtiny   Re: Natalee Holloway Investigation - Edition 2 - Jerry and Murray's Newsletter  Sun Dec 03, 2006 34k
    Debbie   Re: (no subject)  Sun Dec 03, 2006 18k
    murray live   (no subject)  Sun Dec 03, 2006 6k
    murray live   Re: unsubscribe - Dana  Sun Dec 03, 2006 5k
    murray live   Re: unsubscribe - Pam Williams  Sun Dec 03, 2006 7k
    murray live   IMPORTANT: To Debbie and Ian / Team BFN  Sun Dec 03, 2006 6k
    murray live   To Ian - Jerry and Murray Alert  Sun Dec 03, 2006 5k
    murray live   Ian Lies - Jerry and Murray ALERT  Sun Dec 03, 2006 8k
    murray live   Re: Natalee Holloway Investigation - Edition 2 - Jerry and Murray's Newsletter  Sun Dec 03, 2006 20k

    murray live   Natalee Holloway Investigation - Edition 2 - Jerry and Murray's Newsletter  Sun Dec 03, 2006 7k
    murray live   Thankyou for subscribing to Jerry & Murray's Newsletter  Sun Dec 03, 2006 5k


yes mine too, ive been having a hell of a time trying to block it.


Dana,
Jerry was a TOTAL nut case from BFN.. he use to come to the chat room and was banned for his strange behavior some at BFN think that he also a poster that goes by the name Scars claiming he saw the murder through Natalee's eyes.. HE IS JUST twisted



oh ok, but how the hell did he get all of our email addresses.


your web site maybe


Nope, I don't have a website.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #553 12/3 - 12/4/2006
Post by: Tylergal on December 04, 2006, 03:19:48 PM
Quote from: "Katysmom"
Quote from: "Dana"
Quote from: "Sue"
Quote from: "Dana"
Quote from: "Katysmom"
my mailbox was just flooded with all this stuff about Natalee.  I haven't opened any of them.  Does anyone know what this is about.  I do know I haven't subscribed to any newsletter.

Susie Que   jerry&MURRAY Alert  Mon Dec 04, 2006 9k
    hardyandtiny   Re: Natalee Holloway Investigation - Edition 2 - Jerry and Murray's Newsletter  Sun Dec 03, 2006 34k
    Debbie   Re: (no subject)  Sun Dec 03, 2006 18k
    murray live   (no subject)  Sun Dec 03, 2006 6k
    murray live   Re: unsubscribe - Dana  Sun Dec 03, 2006 5k
    murray live   Re: unsubscribe - Pam Williams  Sun Dec 03, 2006 7k
    murray live   IMPORTANT: To Debbie and Ian / Team BFN  Sun Dec 03, 2006 6k
    murray live   To Ian - Jerry and Murray Alert  Sun Dec 03, 2006 5k
    murray live   Ian Lies - Jerry and Murray ALERT  Sun Dec 03, 2006 8k
    murray live   Re: Natalee Holloway Investigation - Edition 2 - Jerry and Murray's Newsletter  Sun Dec 03, 2006 20k
    murray live   Natalee Holloway Investigation - Edition 2 - Jerry and Murray's Newsletter  Sun Dec 03, 2006 7k
    murray live   Thankyou for subscribing to Jerry & Murray's Newsletter  Sun Dec 03, 2006 5k


yes mine too, ive been having a hell of a time trying to block it.


Dana,
Jerry was a TOTAL nut case from BFN.. he use to come to the chat room and was banned for his strange behavior some at BFN think that he also a poster that goes by the name Scars claiming he saw the murder through Natalee's eyes.. HE IS JUST twisted


oh ok, but how the hell did he get all of our email addresses.


Debbie at BFN started a thread on these emails.  He went in to everyone's profile and copied their addresses.  I immediately went in and changed my email address to private.  Are you registered at BFN?  Maybe he's making the rounds to all the Natalee forums.


I am a little skeptical of that information, not from you, however.  But my address has been gotten from that site more than once.  I really do not trust some of the hierarchy at BFN, sad to say.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #553 12/3 - 12/4/2006
Post by: robots on December 04, 2006, 03:32:23 PM
Quote from: "SunnyinTX"
Quote from: "robots"
i think the only one in the world that finds joran delicious is
JOE TACOPINHEAD


mmmm..mmmmmmmmm


YUCK

JOE IS GROSS

JORAN is GROSS

PAULUS is GROSS


3 greasy PIGS


ohhhhhhhhhhh..NOooooooooooooooooooooooooo



please dont sue me JOE...please DONT  :twisted:  :twisted:  :twisted:  :twisted:

you are a HACK
here is my impersonation of JOE

"WAHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHH"

 :twisted:


Robots thanks for making me laugh out loud!  LOL



 :D  :D  :D  :D  8)


Title: Lively Case Discussion #553 12/3 - 12/4/2006
Post by: Katysmom on December 04, 2006, 03:32:29 PM
Quote from: "Tylergal"
Quote from: "Katysmom"
Quote from: "Dana"
Quote from: "Sue"
Quote from: "Dana"
Quote from: "Katysmom"
my mailbox was just flooded with all this stuff about Natalee.  I haven't opened any of them.  Does anyone know what this is about.  I do know I haven't subscribed to any newsletter.

Susie Que   jerry&MURRAY Alert  Mon Dec 04, 2006 9k
    hardyandtiny   Re: Natalee Holloway Investigation - Edition 2 - Jerry and Murray's Newsletter  Sun Dec 03, 2006 34k
    Debbie   Re: (no subject)  Sun Dec 03, 2006 18k
    murray live   (no subject)  Sun Dec 03, 2006 6k
    murray live   Re: unsubscribe - Dana  Sun Dec 03, 2006 5k
    murray live   Re: unsubscribe - Pam Williams  Sun Dec 03, 2006 7k
    murray live   IMPORTANT: To Debbie and Ian / Team BFN  Sun Dec 03, 2006 6k
    murray live   To Ian - Jerry and Murray Alert  Sun Dec 03, 2006 5k
    murray live   Ian Lies - Jerry and Murray ALERT  Sun Dec 03, 2006 8k
    murray live   Re: Natalee Holloway Investigation - Edition 2 - Jerry and Murray's Newsletter  Sun Dec 03, 2006 20k
    murray live   Natalee Holloway Investigation - Edition 2 - Jerry and Murray's Newsletter  Sun Dec 03, 2006 7k
    murray live   Thankyou for subscribing to Jerry & Murray's Newsletter  Sun Dec 03, 2006 5k


yes mine too, ive been having a hell of a time trying to block it.


Dana,
Jerry was a TOTAL nut case from BFN.. he use to come to the chat room and was banned for his strange behavior some at BFN think that he also a poster that goes by the name Scars claiming he saw the murder through Natalee's eyes.. HE IS JUST twisted


oh ok, but how the hell did he get all of our email addresses.


Debbie at BFN started a thread on these emails.  He went in to everyone's profile and copied their addresses.  I immediately went in and changed my email address to private.  Are you registered at BFN?  Maybe he's making the rounds to all the Natalee forums.


I am a little skeptical of that information, not from you, however.  But my address has been gotten from that site more than once.  I really do not trust some of the hierarchy at BFN, sad to say.


Doesn't BFN orginate from Aruba?  I think I heard that many months ago and that is when I stopped going there.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #553 12/3 - 12/4/2006
Post by: Katysmom on December 04, 2006, 03:48:36 PM
Quote from: "Dana"
Nope, I don't have a website.


You should have a web site!!!


Title: Lively Case Discussion #553 12/3 - 12/4/2006
Post by: bleachedblack on December 04, 2006, 04:01:01 PM
Quote from: "klaasend"
DANA - At Blogs for Natalee in your profile you have the option to set your email to private, yours is not private at BFN.  Mine is private at BFN and I have not received any of the wierd emails.


Mine is private and I didn't get any either......guess that's the answer. I see he is back starting threads and posting there.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #553 12/3 - 12/4/2006
Post by: LilPuma on December 04, 2006, 04:01:38 PM
Quote from: "robots"
YUCK

JOE IS GROSS

JORAN is GROSS

PAULUS is GROSS


3 greasy PIGS


ohhhhhhhhhhh..NOooooooooooooooooooooooooo



please dont sue me JOE...please DONT  :twisted:  :twisted:  :twisted:  :twisted:

you are a HACK
here is my impersonation of JOE



Tacopina v. Robots

Attorney for JT:  Joe, tell the jury what Mr. Robots said about you.  

JT:  He called me a pinhead on the Scared Monkeys message board.  

Attorney for JT:  Now, Joe, did this have far reaching repercussions in your personal and professional life?  

JT:  Yes.  

Attorney for JT:  Tell us about that Joe.  

JT:  I cried and cried and cried and whined and my clients hated me and my wife thought I was a wimp.  

Judge:  Case dismissed.  Mr. Tacopina, you will pay all court costs and attorneys fees for Mr. Robots.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #553 12/3 - 12/4/2006
Post by: LilPuma on December 04, 2006, 04:09:47 PM
Quote from: "Tylergal"

I want to disagree that he called out of whole cloth.  I think it had to be a set-up as a network would refuse his call.  Incidentally this is a program that is prerecorded so it would have had to be a set up between him and the hostess in collusion with the network to have him on.  These programs are not live and do not request call in so obviously someone wanted him on as a rebuttal, probably Kimberly, perhaps JQK who wanted the world to see who the real baffoon really is.


Some of the Fox shows are live, Tylergal.  At least that's what it says on my screen during the show.  I do think The Lineup is one of them.  I think Greta is also live.  Now I don't get the "Live" thing on the O'Reilly show.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #553 12/3 - 12/4/2006
Post by: robots on December 04, 2006, 04:10:33 PM
Quote from: "LilPuma"
Quote from: "robots"
YUCK

JOE IS GROSS

JORAN is GROSS

PAULUS is GROSS


3 greasy PIGS


ohhhhhhhhhhh..NOooooooooooooooooooooooooo



please dont sue me JOE...please DONT  :twisted:  :twisted:  :twisted:  :twisted:

you are a HACK
here is my impersonation of JOE



Tacopina v. Robots

Attorney for JT:  Joe, tell the jury what Mr. Robots said about you.  

JT:  He called me a pinhead on the Scared Monkeys message board.  

Attorney for JT:  Now, Joe, did this have far reaching repercussions in your personal and professional life?  

JT:  Yes.  

Attorney for JT:  Tell us about that Joe.  

JT:  I cried and cried and cried and whined and my clients hated me and my wife thought I was a wimp.  

Judge:  Case dismissed.  Mr. Tacopina, you will pay all court costs and attorneys fees for Mr. Robots.


puma rocks  8)


Title: Lively Case Discussion #553 12/3 - 12/4/2006
Post by: LilPuma on December 04, 2006, 04:12:38 PM
Quote from: "blah"
Quote from: "klaasend"
From another site.  According to the Diario article today, Freddy Arambatzis also claims in a statement that Carlo was almost crying saying Joran needs to tell the truth.



Sounds to me like any good cop would be able to make Carlo crack and spill the beans.  Dont they have laws that lwyers cannot LIE for their clients?  Maybe they need to threaten some action against Carlo to get him to spill it !!


I'm feeling now like I don't want to be too hard on Mr. Carlo.  He's part of the Aruban justice system and he wants the truth to come out.  Sounds like he's an endangered species to me.  Like the turtles.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #553 12/3 - 12/4/2006
Post by: Dana on December 04, 2006, 04:18:39 PM
Quote from: "Katysmom"
Quote from: "Dana"
Nope, I don't have a website.


You should have a web site!!!


actually i never wrote that

my/our web site is
www.scaredmonkeys.com/radio


Title: Lively Case Discussion #553 12/3 - 12/4/2006
Post by: robots on December 04, 2006, 04:19:58 PM
everyone should at least one website

i have about 20  8)



 :twisted:  :twisted:  :twisted:  :twisted:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #553 12/3 - 12/4/2006
Post by: LilPuma on December 04, 2006, 04:21:29 PM
Quote from: "San"
What I would like to know is how Tacopina would know first hand that Gerald Dompig was fired.  He is admitting right there that the ALE and government are keeping him informed on what is going on with the coverup.

Can you hear it now "OK Joe we took care of the Dompig issue what do you want us to do next". :roll:


ALE and the Aruban government are not likely keeping JoeT informed of anything.  He has trashed ALE publicly so many times.  That doesn't mean that someone from Aruba isn't telling him things.  Unfortunately, we've seen firsthand how credible information out of Aruba can be.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #553 12/3 - 12/4/2006
Post by: robots on December 04, 2006, 04:29:04 PM
joe t.
is in SPIN MODE

he knows his CLIENT is guilty as sin and the ONLY THING he can do now is try and save face and his way is even more disgusting that i thought possible. it is now or never for SLICK JOE...
guess what JOE ??  YOU LOSE !!  YOURE A LOSEEEEEEEEEER


he will do a FLIP TURN very soon, you watch !
once the evidence starts coming out... he will say "i was just doing my job"

WELL,,, SCREW OFF joe, you JERK OFF !!

trashing the victims and the family is not your job, JERK OFF !!

he is so ugly because of the way he
has treated the victims most people will find him repugnant for the rest of their lives.


JOE, go to church, say a prayer, apologize for your JERK OFF behavior
to Natalee's family

DO SOMETHING other than trashing the VICTIM

GEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEESHHHHHHHH



youre on the LIST of

I HATE EM ALL


CONGRATULATIONS  JOE

you have linked yourself with paulus and JORAN and K2

way to go !!!!


Title: Lively Case Discussion #553 12/3 - 12/4/2006
Post by: Tylergal on December 04, 2006, 04:29:06 PM
Quote from: "LilPuma"
Quote from: "Tylergal"

I want to disagree that he called out of whole cloth.  I think it had to be a set-up as a network would refuse his call.  Incidentally this is a program that is prerecorded so it would have had to be a set up between him and the hostess in collusion with the network to have him on.  These programs are not live and do not request call in so obviously someone wanted him on as a rebuttal, probably Kimberly, perhaps JQK who wanted the world to see who the real baffoon really is.


Some of the Fox shows are live, Tylergal.  At least that's what it says on my screen during the show.  I do think The Lineup is one of them.  I think Greta is also live.  Now I don't get the "Live" thing on the O'Reilly show.


Yea, they were live when they were live.  They are not live when they are shown to us.  It only means this is the freshest episode we got here.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #553 12/3 - 12/4/2006
Post by: Tylergal on December 04, 2006, 04:30:23 PM
Quote from: "bleachedblack"
Quote from: "klaasend"
DANA - At Blogs for Natalee in your profile you have the option to set your email to private, yours is not private at BFN.  Mine is private at BFN and I have not received any of the wierd emails.


Mine is private and I didn't get any either......guess that's the answer. I see he is back starting threads and posting there.


Well, mine was private until "they" decided to make it public.  I did not do that.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #553 12/3 - 12/4/2006
Post by: robots on December 04, 2006, 04:30:53 PM
was that a RANT ????

 :twisted:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #553 12/3 - 12/4/2006
Post by: Sue on December 04, 2006, 04:30:57 PM

I DO NOT for one minute believe that Joe T had every piece of information
in Karins Files has he has claimed on national TV..
He is so full of Poop his eyes are brown, Oh thats right they are brown
that explains everything


Title: Lively Case Discussion #553 12/3 - 12/4/2006
Post by: Tylergal on December 04, 2006, 04:31:15 PM
Quote from: "robots"
everyone should at least one website

i have about 20  8)



 :twisted:  :twisted:  :twisted:  :twisted:


Twenty?  Dayum.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #553 12/3 - 12/4/2006
Post by: robots on December 04, 2006, 04:31:45 PM
does anyone have a picture of JORAN missing his front teeth ??

cause i think thats what youre gonna see pretty soon


i can sense it  8)


Title: Lively Case Discussion #553 12/3 - 12/4/2006
Post by: San on December 04, 2006, 04:31:57 PM
Quote from: "LilPuma"
Quote from: "San"
What I would like to know is how Tacopina would know first hand that Gerald Dompig was fired.  He is admitting right there that the ALE and government are keeping him informed on what is going on with the coverup.

Can you hear it now "OK Joe we took care of the Dompig issue what do you want us to do next". :roll:


ALE and the Aruban government are not likely keeping JoeT informed of anything.  He has trashed ALE publicly so many times.  That doesn't mean that someone from Aruba isn't telling him things.  Unfortunately, we've seen firsthand how credible information out of Aruba can be.

When Aruba comes out and tries to explain what happened to Natalee by saying she overdosed I guess we have Joe Tacopina to thank for setting us straight on National TV by saying she didn't.  They goes that story Aruba.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #553 12/3 - 12/4/2006
Post by: robots on December 04, 2006, 04:32:08 PM
Quote from: "Tylergal"
Quote from: "robots"
everyone should at least one website

i have about 20  8)



 :twisted:  :twisted:  :twisted:  :twisted:


Twenty?  Dayum.


maybe 23  8)


Title: Lively Case Discussion #553 12/3 - 12/4/2006
Post by: robots on December 04, 2006, 04:32:35 PM
Quote from: "San"
Quote from: "LilPuma"
Quote from: "San"
What I would like to know is how Tacopina would know first hand that Gerald Dompig was fired.  He is admitting right there that the ALE and government are keeping him informed on what is going on with the coverup.

Can you hear it now "OK Joe we took care of the Dompig issue what do you want us to do next". :roll:


ALE and the Aruban government are not likely keeping JoeT informed of anything.  He has trashed ALE publicly so many times.  That doesn't mean that someone from Aruba isn't telling him things.  Unfortunately, we've seen firsthand how credible information out of Aruba can be.

When Aruba comes out and tries to explain what happened to Natalee by saying she overdosed I guess we have Joe Tacopina to thank for setting us straight on National TV by saying she didn't.  They goes that story Aruba.


thanks a lot JOE !!! :lol:  :lol:  :lol:  :lol:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #553 12/3 - 12/4/2006
Post by: Tylergal on December 04, 2006, 04:33:22 PM
Quote from: "robots"
Quote from: "Tylergal"
Quote from: "robots"
everyone should at least one website

i have about 20  8)



 :twisted:  :twisted:  :twisted:  :twisted:


Twenty?  Dayum.


maybe 23  8)


You really are a robot (automaton).


Title: Lively Case Discussion #553 12/3 - 12/4/2006
Post by: robots on December 04, 2006, 04:33:45 PM
Quote from: "Tylergal"
Quote from: "robots"
Quote from: "Tylergal"
Quote from: "robots"
everyone should at least one website

i have about 20  8)



 :twisted:  :twisted:  :twisted:  :twisted:


Twenty?  Dayum.


maybe 23  8)


You really are a robot (automaton).


bones like IRON and BLOOD like mercury  8)


Title: Lively Case Discussion #553 12/3 - 12/4/2006
Post by: Katysmom on December 04, 2006, 04:35:21 PM
Quote from: "LilPuma"
Quote from: "San"
What I would like to know is how Tacopina would know first hand that Gerald Dompig was fired.  He is admitting right there that the ALE and government are keeping him informed on what is going on with the coverup.

Can you hear it now "OK Joe we took care of the Dompig issue what do you want us to do next". :roll:


ALE and the Aruban government are not likely keeping JoeT informed of anything.  He has trashed ALE publicly so many times.  That doesn't mean that someone from Aruba isn't telling him things.  Unfortunately, we've seen firsthand how credible information out of Aruba can be.
[/b]

My guess would be Julia[/b]


Title: Lively Case Discussion #553 12/3 - 12/4/2006
Post by: Carnut on December 04, 2006, 04:36:53 PM
Quote from: "nonesuche"
Well I see carnut has played contrarian again on Guido, some things never change  :lol: Carnut do you know any gay or bisexual men? They don't wear a sign, nor does most of the free world think it's something to be ashamed of, but on Aruba it has a stigma. Boys don't stop to mention or attach a term to a relationship beyond friendship, unless something sexual is afoot with one another  :roll: you conveniently forget his attorney Spong also stated on record Guido is homosexual !


Huh? Where have I stated that I didn't believe that Guido was gay?


Title: Lively Case Discussion #553 12/3 - 12/4/2006
Post by: San on December 04, 2006, 04:40:57 PM
This reminds me of how Joe Tacopina sounded last night :lol:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tQFSNPDSPqg


Title: Lively Case Discussion #553 12/3 - 12/4/2006
Post by: Carnut on December 04, 2006, 04:41:16 PM
Quote from: "Katysmom"

I am a little skeptical of that information, not from you, however.  But my address has been gotten from that site more than once.  I really do not trust some of the hierarchy at BFN, sad to say.


Doesn't BFN orginate from Aruba?  I think I heard that many months ago and that is when I stopped going there.[/quote]

No, BFN dosen't originate from aruba.

BFN does allow a wider variety of posters than here.

BFN is actually complimentary to SM.

As for email address harvesting, just remember nothing on the internet is secure.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #553 12/3 - 12/4/2006
Post by: klaasend on December 04, 2006, 05:35:34 PM
This was posted on the front page of SM saying it was brought over from BFN.  I don't know who translated it or the accuracy of the translations.  I'm assuming this is from todays article about the case in Diario:

NOTE:  THIS IS AN OLD EDITORIAL ORIGINALLY PUBLISHED IN DIARIO MARCH 20, 2006

DIARIO Editorial:

An element called Tacopina

Last night, the attorney who is representing Joran in the US found it appropriate to explain, in a lowly way, that I am prejudiced against Joran because his father was in the team who handed over a few members of my family to the US.

There’s another element who does not know how to read Papiamento and has no notion what I have said about Joran. I have said on various occasions that I don’t know whether he is guilty or innocent! Furthermore, I don’t have any sort of prejudice against Joran or his father! I had no ide! that Paul could have been in any commission which judged who is part of my family. That’s news to me!

Joe Tacopina, with his witchy style of bring things forward, forcing a conclusion which doesn’t exist, wants to defend a habitual, chronic liar, who has a confirmed history of violence.

Joran was known in his school as a kid who bullied younger kids; he was described by a teacher as a habitual liar; he was caught with his hands in the lockers of other kids; he was under treatment for his inability to control his anger and the violent part of his character; he was gambling for money in a casino, at an age where it is prohibited to set foot in a casino, and a few times accompanied by his father!

Into what sort of ‘saint’ does Tacopina want to turn Joran? He doesn’t know that Joran lied that Deepak came to pick him up at the beach, and when Deepak stood up and said that it’s not true, he then changed to saying it was Satish. When Satish also stood up and said that it wasn’t true, he left the question hanging, and it will be good of Tacopina, in his great wisdom, to explain to us how Joran arrived at his house in the morning hours, with or without shoes!

Another point which Tacopina, in his febrile attempt to defend his client, does not take into account is the following: how Deepak could have come to pick up Joran at the beach, if Joran declared to 4 Police officers on the 13 of June 2005 that Deepak was with him at the beach, that Deepak went back towards the girl, where he had left her sleeping on the sand, and that he believes that Deepak raped and then killed the girl? Tacopina can be a good attorney, but in this case he is far from home!

And how does Tacopina explain the fact that Joran told Police that they had sex with Natalee when she was coming in and out of consciousness, and then on television he said that because he did not have a prophylactic he didn’t have sex with her! Who does Tacopina take us for?

For idiots? A 17-year-old kid with only one thing on his mind, is going to miss such an opportunity because he has no protection? And Tacopina believes Joran when he told Greta that he NEVER had sexual relations with a girl without using a condom? Come now, Mister Tacopina, give us at least a little more consideration and stop insulting our intelligence!

Tacopina also forgets, perhaps voluntarily?. That his client admitted to Police that they took Natalee to his apartment from Carlos and Charlies! How could he be at his apartment with Natalee and at the same time on the beach with her? It would be good for Tacopina to explain to us the mathematics of the timeline, because in our mathematics, you cannot be in two different places at the same time!

On one hand, I enjoyed Tacopina, because he made me laugh with his ridiculous statements. If in reality he is an attorney interested in the truth, he would not be planting so many lies which could even compete with those of his client.

Finally (for now) how does Tacopina explain the concrete fact that his client was the last one who was with Natalee at the time that she disappeared and suddenly, he doesn’t know what happened to her?

Was there magic involved? Tacopina believes that Yomanda, Negro Felipe or Maria Lionza could have been involved? Because it is impossible that Joran doesn’t know what happened to Natalee if he was the last person who was with Natalee in his apartment, or on the beach, like he has admitted on so many occasions!

The types of expressions out of Tacopina do not seem those of a serious person, and even less of those of an attorney who believes in the truth.

It could be his duty to defend his client, whether he believes he is guilty or innocent, but let it be done in a professional way, acknowledging Joran’s multiple lies, and not trying to reduce them to only two, like he tried to do last night! If he wants, I can explain how many lies and changing stories Joran offered Police. We are very well aware of everything!


Title: Lively Case Discussion #553 12/3 - 12/4/2006
Post by: Tylergal on December 04, 2006, 05:42:13 PM
Quote from: "klaasend"
This was posted on the front page of SM saying it was brought over from BFN.  I don't know who translated it or the accuracy of the translations.  I'm assuming this is from todays article about the case in Diario:

DIARIO Editorial:

An element called Tacopina

Last night, the attorney who is representing Joran in the US found it appropriate to explain, in a lowly way, that I am prejudiced against Joran because his father was in the team who handed over a few members of my family to the US.

There’s another element who does not know how to read Papiamento and has no notion what I have said about Joran. I have said on various occasions that I don’t know whether he is guilty or innocent! Furthermore, I don’t have any sort of prejudice against Joran or his father! I had no ide! that Paul could have been in any commission which judged who is part of my family. That’s news to me!

Joe Tacopina, with his witchy style of bring things forward, forcing a conclusion which doesn’t exist, wants to defend a habitual, chronic liar, who has a confirmed history of violence.

Joran was known in his school as a kid who bullied younger kids; he was described by a teacher as a habitual liar; he was caught with his hands in the lockers of other kids; he was under treatment for his inability to control his anger and the violent part of his character; he was gambling for money in a casino, at an age where it is prohibited to set foot in a casino, and a few times accompanied by his father!

Into what sort of ‘saint’ does Tacopina want to turn Joran? He doesn’t know that Joran lied that Deepak came to pick him up at the beach, and when Deepak stood up and said that it’s not true, he then changed to saying it was Satish. When Satish also stood up and said that it wasn’t true, he left the question hanging, and it will be good of Tacopina, in his great wisdom, to explain to us how Joran arrived at his house in the morning hours, with or without shoes!

Another point which Tacopina, in his febrile attempt to defend his client, does not take into account is the following: how Deepak could have come to pick up Joran at the beach, if Joran declared to 4 Police officers on the 13 of June 2005 that Deepak was with him at the beach, that Deepak went back towards the girl, where he had left her sleeping on the sand, and that he believes that Deepak raped and then killed the girl? Tacopina can be a good attorney, but in this case he is far from home!

And how does Tacopina explain the fact that Joran told Police that they had sex with Natalee when she was coming in and out of consciousness, and then on television he said that because he did not have a prophylactic he didn’t have sex with her! Who does Tacopina take us for?

For idiots? A 17-year-old kid with only one thing on his mind, is going to miss such an opportunity because he has no protection? And Tacopina believes Joran when he told Greta that he NEVER had sexual relations with a girl without using a condom? Come now, Mister Tacopina, give us at least a little more consideration and stop insulting our intelligence!

Tacopina also forgets, perhaps voluntarily?. That his client admitted to Police that they took Natalee to his apartment from Carlos and Charlies! How could he be at his apartment with Natalee and at the same time on the beach with her? It would be good for Tacopina to explain to us the mathematics of the timeline, because in our mathematics, you cannot be in two different places at the same time!

On one hand, I enjoyed Tacopina, because he made me laugh with his ridiculous statements. If in reality he is an attorney interested in the truth, he would not be planting so many lies which could even compete with those of his client.

Finally (for now) how does Tacopina explain the concrete fact that his client was the last one who was with Natalee at the time that she disappeared and suddenly, he doesn’t know what happened to her?

Was there magic involved? Tacopina believes that Yomanda, Negro Felipe or Maria Lionza could have been involved? Because it is impossible that Joran doesn’t know what happened to Natalee if he was the last person who was with Natalee in his apartment, or on the beach, like he has admitted on so many occasions!

The types of expressions out of Tacopina do not seem those of a serious person, and even less of those of an attorney who believes in the truth.

It could be his duty to defend his client, whether he believes he is guilty or innocent, but let it be done in a professional way, acknowledging Joran’s multiple lies, and not trying to reduce them to only two, like he tried to do last night! If he wants, I can explain how many lies and changing stories Joran offered Police. We are very well aware of everything!


LOL.  I loved the part about competing with his client for "Lies."


Title: Lively Case Discussion #553 12/3 - 12/4/2006
Post by: San on December 04, 2006, 05:50:41 PM
Quote from: "robots"
does anyone have a picture of JORAN missing his front teeth ??

cause i think thats what youre gonna see pretty soon


i can sense it  8)

I'm not klaas so this is the best I can do :lol:
(http://i34.photobucket.com/albums/d118/Sanddrops/Joran6.jpg)


Title: Lively Case Discussion #553 12/3 - 12/4/2006
Post by: klaasend on December 04, 2006, 05:52:23 PM
Quote from: "robots"
does anyone have a picture of JORAN missing his front teeth ??

cause i think thats what youre gonna see pretty soon


i can sense it  8)


(http://i37.photobucket.com/albums/e82/klaasend2/JOranTeeth.jpg)


Title: Lively Case Discussion #553 12/3 - 12/4/2006
Post by: robots on December 04, 2006, 05:52:45 PM
Quote from: "San"
Quote from: "robots"
does anyone have a picture of JORAN missing his front teeth ??

cause i think thats what youre gonna see pretty soon


i can sense it  8)

I'm not klaas so this is the best I can do :lol:
(http://i34.photobucket.com/albums/d118/Sanddrops/Joran6.jpg)



thank you
thats good but can you knock out a few more  8)  :twisted:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #553 12/3 - 12/4/2006
Post by: robots on December 04, 2006, 05:53:44 PM
Quote from: "klaasend"
Quote from: "robots"
does anyone have a picture of JORAN missing his front teeth ??

cause i think thats what youre gonna see pretty soon


i can sense it  8)


(http://i37.photobucket.com/albums/e82/klaasend2/JOranTeeth.jpg)


thanks

maybe knock out another couple


we will be getting a PREVIEW of whats to come
 8)


Title: Lively Case Discussion #553 12/3 - 12/4/2006
Post by: klaasend on December 04, 2006, 06:05:08 PM
NEW FRONT PAGE POST - TRANSLATION OF TODAYS DIARIO ARTICLE:

Diario … Joran van der Sloot’s lawyer, Carlo, asked Joran “almost in tears” to tell the truth


http://www.scaredmonkeys.com/2006/12/04/diario-joran-van-der-sloots-lawyer-carlo-asked-joran-almost-in-tears-to-tell-the-truth/

Note:  This is not the same thing I posted on the previous page


Title: Lively Case Discussion #553 12/3 - 12/4/2006
Post by: Buckeye on December 04, 2006, 06:08:16 PM
Quote from: "klaasend"
NEW FRONT PAGE POST - TRANSLATION OF TODAYS DIARIO ARTICLE:

Diario … Joran van der Sloot’s lawyer, Carlo, asked Joran “almost in tears” to tell the truth


http://www.scaredmonkeys.com/2006/12/04/diario-joran-van-der-sloots-lawyer-carlo-asked-joran-almost-in-tears-to-tell-the-truth/

Note:  This is not the same thing I posted on the previous page


I think the previous one was an old one.  I remember hearing parts (or reading parts) already.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #553 12/3 - 12/4/2006
Post by: robots on December 04, 2006, 06:19:26 PM
so, was JORAN in tears or was the lawyer in tears after joran told what happened ? :oops:  :oops:  :oops:  :oops:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #553 12/3 - 12/4/2006
Post by: klaasend on December 04, 2006, 06:19:32 PM
NOTE:  The Diario editorial I posted a couple pages back, that someone posted on the front page of SM, saying it was from BFN is old, it was actually from March 20, 2006 and was translated by Getagrip.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #553 12/3 - 12/4/2006
Post by: igsigs on December 04, 2006, 06:23:08 PM
Quote from: "klaasend"
Diario … Joran van der Sloot’s lawyer, Carlo, asked Joran “almost in tears” to tell the truth

Thanks RED. Timely translation. I noticed trans requests on "other" sites were met with resistance. I now see why.

Anyone who fails to see all these Sloot machinations as anything other than a desperate and criminal attempt to thwart justice is living in a dream world.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #553 12/3 - 12/4/2006
Post by: robots on December 04, 2006, 06:24:22 PM
so, joran is the one in tears


Title: Lively Case Discussion #553 12/3 - 12/4/2006
Post by: robots on December 04, 2006, 06:27:23 PM
but but but but........errrrrrrrrr.....ummmmmmmmmmmm

if he is so INNOCENT  as "JOE the LOAD of BULLCRAP" says

why is joran crying talking to his lawyer


that would be stupid and idiotic to be crying if you did nothing wrong


Title: Lively Case Discussion #553 12/3 - 12/4/2006
Post by: igsigs on December 04, 2006, 06:29:20 PM
Quote from: "robots"
so, joran is the one in tears

and Carlo...

and TACO...

maybe Paulus...although his liquid excretions defy definition. IMO.  8)


Title: Lively Case Discussion #553 12/3 - 12/4/2006
Post by: robots on December 04, 2006, 06:31:30 PM
Quote from: "igsigs"
Quote from: "robots"
so, joran is the one in tears

and Carlo...

and TACO...

maybe Paulus...although his liquid excretions defy definition. IMO.  8)



ROFLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLLL 8)


Title: Lively Case Discussion #553 12/3 - 12/4/2006
Post by: klaasend on December 04, 2006, 06:37:14 PM
O/T

3 Members of Missing Family Found Alive
Dec 4, 6:40 PM (ET)


GRANTS PASS, Ore. (AP) - Three members of a San Francisco family missing for more than a week were found alive Monday in a remote area or southern Oregon, police said. A search continued for the father.

Investigators said a helicopter spotted 30-year-old Kati Kim waving an umbrella about 1:45 p.m. They also said they found daughters Penelope, 4, and Sabine, 7 months.

They were airlifted to a hospital in Grants Pass. There was no immediate word on their condition.

Rescuers continued to look for Kati Kim's husband, 35-year-old James Kim. He had left on foot two days ago to seek help, police said.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #553 12/3 - 12/4/2006
Post by: igsigs on December 04, 2006, 06:44:34 PM
Good one by Daniel at FOB. In response to the massive misinformation campaign going on at FOB to assist the Sloots by discrediting De Vries...

"Seeing how much this has been happening lately, I guess some people feel there's something to be gained by misrepresenting De Vries to the readers here. Personally, i think people only hurt their cause when they feel the need to tell lies"


Title: Lively Case Discussion #553 12/3 - 12/4/2006
Post by: Tylergal on December 04, 2006, 06:44:57 PM
Quote from: "klaasend"
O/T

3 Members of Missing Family Found Alive
Dec 4, 6:40 PM (ET)


GRANTS PASS, Ore. (AP) - Three members of a San Francisco family missing for more than a week were found alive Monday in a remote area or southern Oregon, police said. A search continued for the father.

Investigators said a helicopter spotted 30-year-old Kati Kim waving an umbrella about 1:45 p.m. They also said they found daughters Penelope, 4, and Sabine, 7 months.

They were airlifted to a hospital in Grants Pass. There was no immediate word on their condition.

Rescuers continued to look for Kati Kim's husband, 35-year-old James Kim. He had left on foot two days ago to seek help, police said.


That's too bad.  I wondered what had happened to them.  I heard this on TV (I think). It seems like they went missing around Thanksgiving on their way to visit friends, is this right?


Title: Lively Case Discussion #553 12/3 - 12/4/2006
Post by: Tylergal on December 04, 2006, 06:46:37 PM
Quote from: "Tylergal"
Quote from: "klaasend"
O/T

3 Members of Missing Family Found Alive
Dec 4, 6:40 PM (ET)


GRANTS PASS, Ore. (AP) - Three members of a San Francisco family missing for more than a week were found alive Monday in a remote area or southern Oregon, police said. A search continued for the father.

Investigators said a helicopter spotted 30-year-old Kati Kim waving an umbrella about 1:45 p.m. They also said they found daughters Penelope, 4, and Sabine, 7 months.

They were airlifted to a hospital in Grants Pass. There was no immediate word on their condition.

Rescuers continued to look for Kati Kim's husband, 35-year-old James Kim. He had left on foot two days ago to seek help, police said.


That's too bad.  I wondered what had happened to them.  I heard this on TV (I think). It seems like they went missing around Thanksgiving on their way to visit friends, is this right?


Wait - I said that wrong. :)  I meant it is too bad they have not yet found the father.  I fear for him if they have not found him in a remote area.  He could have been lost and died, or he could have met with foul play.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #553 12/3 - 12/4/2006
Post by: robots on December 04, 2006, 06:59:27 PM
NEWS FLASH


JOE TACOPINA proposes marriage to JORAN



JORAN says his heart is for GUIDO




JOE TACOPINA will continue to fight for JORAN'S BELT....er ahh umm

i mean his love



heheheehheeheeeeeeeeeeeeeee



MAN oh MAN

i hate them all

 8)


Title: Lively Case Discussion #553 12/3 - 12/4/2006
Post by: San on December 04, 2006, 06:59:55 PM
From the Front Page article.

    “The suspect (Joran van der Sloot) said, as I (”I” is the Dutch officer) heard, that he (van der Sloot) asked his mother to contact by phone his witness Zedan Arambatzis, to find out what he told the police”.[/list]
    So Joran was the one who told Anita to contact Freddy.  Freddy was involved with Joran and the Kalpoes know that Freddy is involved and that's why they said Freddy needs to tell the truth.

    Freddy was the one who thought of the lie about the Fisherman's huts and Joran ran with it.  Joran needed to know what Freddy said so his story would be close.

    Through the whole case Joran seems to be worried about his father and Freddy.


    Title: Lively Case Discussion #553 12/3 - 12/4/2006
    Post by: Buckeye on December 04, 2006, 07:00:21 PM
    Going through ols stuff and I think I have a copy of the AM digital announcement about the boys.  Originally a pdf link on RW (I think). Links no longer work.

    Authorities
                    decided to comb the
                    above mentioned area
                    after interrogating
                    the three young men
                    that were last seen
                    with Natalee. The
                    three young men
                    declared that the took
                    Natalee to that area,
                    had s*x with her, and
                    then dropped her at the
                    Holiday Inn Resort.
    The
                    security cameras
                    of the resort
                    however do not
                    show her entering
                    the hotel at any
                    time that evening.
                    As a result of this
                    the three witnesses
                    who saw her last
                    now become
                    suspects.
                    then dropped her at the
                    security cameras
                    of the resort
                    however do not
                    show her entering
                    the hotel at any
                    time that evening.
                    As a result of this
                    the three witnesses
                    who saw her last
                    now become
                    suspects.


    Title: Lively Case Discussion #553 12/3 - 12/4/2006
    Post by: robots on December 04, 2006, 07:00:45 PM
    Quote from: "San"
    From the Front Page article.

      “The suspect (Joran van der Sloot) said, as I (”I” is the Dutch officer) heard, that he (van der Sloot) asked his mother to contact by phone his witness Zedan Arambatzis, to find out what he told the police”.[/list]
      So Joran was the one who told Anita to contact Freddy.  Freddy was involved with Joran and the Kalpoes know that Freddy is involved and that's why they said Freddy needs to tell the truth.

      Freddy was the one who thought of the lie about the Fisherman's huts and Joran ran with it.  Joran needed to know what Freddy said so his story would be close.

      Through the whole case Joran seems to be worried about his father and Freddy.




      JAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAACKPOT


      Title: Lively Case Discussion #553 12/3 - 12/4/2006
      Post by: Buckeye on December 04, 2006, 07:03:01 PM
      Quote from: "San"
      From the Front Page article.

        “The suspect (Joran van der Sloot) said, as I (”I” is the Dutch officer) heard, that he (van der Sloot) asked his mother to contact by phone his witness Zedan Arambatzis, to find out what he told the police”.[/list]
        So Joran was the one who told Anita to contact Freddy.  Freddy was involved with Joran and the Kalpoes know that Freddy is involved and that's why they said Freddy needs to tell the truth.

        Freddy was the one who thought of the lie about the Fisherman's huts and Joran ran with it.  Joran needed to know what Freddy said so his story would be close.

        Through the whole case Joran seems to be worried about his father and Freddy.


        Boy, do I agree with this.  Maybe the three boys and the shovel were freddy, joran and guido....or Pau;us....unless he was the driver...


        Title: Lively Case Discussion #553 12/3 - 12/4/2006
        Post by: Buckeye on December 04, 2006, 07:09:34 PM
        AM digital was June 4th.  The boys said that and that is why they became suspects.


        Title: Lively Case Discussion #553 12/3 - 12/4/2006
        Post by: Ono on December 04, 2006, 07:13:46 PM
        Quote from: "San"
        From the Front Page article.

          “The suspect (Joran van der Sloot) said, as I (”I” is the Dutch officer) heard, that he (van der Sloot) asked his mother to contact by phone his witness Zedan Arambatzis, to find out what he told the police”.[/list]
          So Joran was the one who told Anita to contact Freddy.  Freddy was involved with Joran and the Kalpoes know that Freddy is involved and that's why they said Freddy needs to tell the truth.

          Freddy was the one who thought of the lie about the Fisherman's huts and Joran ran with it.  Joran needed to know what Freddy said so his story would be close.

          Through the whole case Joran seems to be worried about his father and Freddy.


          Curious that we haven't heard if Anita was questioned at some point in time and gave any statements...you would certainly think that would have been done as she is up tp her eyeballs in after-after-the-fact!


          Title: Lively Case Discussion #553 12/3 - 12/4/2006
          Post by: Tylergal on December 04, 2006, 07:16:17 PM
          Quote from: "Ono"
          Quote from: "San"
          From the Front Page article.

            “The suspect (Joran van der Sloot) said, as I (”I” is the Dutch officer) heard, that he (van der Sloot) asked his mother to contact by phone his witness Zedan Arambatzis, to find out what he told the police”.[/list]
            So Joran was the one who told Anita to contact Freddy.  Freddy was involved with Joran and the Kalpoes know that Freddy is involved and that's why they said Freddy needs to tell the truth.

            Freddy was the one who thought of the lie about the Fisherman's huts and Joran ran with it.  Joran needed to know what Freddy said so his story would be close.

            Through the whole case Joran seems to be worried about his father and Freddy.


            Curious that we haven't heard if Anita was questioned at some point in time and gave any statements...you would certainly think that would have been done as she is up tp her eyeballs in after-after-the-fact!


            Anita, the fixer, the controlling medium.


            Title: Lively Case Discussion #553 12/3 - 12/4/2006
            Post by: sandy leiva on December 04, 2006, 07:23:42 PM
            Quote from: klaasend
            http://www.diario-aruba.com/2006/12/4/


            good day monkey friends- will attempt to translate for you.

            Documentonan policial ta mustra; ABOGADO DI JORAN VAN DER SLOOT a PIDI JORAN ‘CASI NA YORAMENTO’ PA BISA E BERDAD

            Political document shows; Joran van dersloots lawyer begs joran , practicall crying out for Joran to tell the truth.

            ORANJESTAD (AAN) --- Recientemente un reportero investigativo na Hulanda a sacodi un rato e caso di Natalee Halloway ora cu den su programa special na television nan a bin saca afor, cu supuestamente abogado di Van Der Sloot a papia cu Fiscal Mayor Janssen y duna e fiscal indicacion cu Joran van der Sloot lo sa mucho mas di e caso di Natalee.
               
            Oranjestad(AAN)  recently a investigative reporter from Holland let the rat out of the bag on the case of Natalee HOlloway on his hour long special television program.  Apparently He found out that Van der sloots lawyer spoke with Karin Jansen and said that Joran Vander sloot knows much more than he is telling about the Natalee Holloway case.


            E programa aki a causa furor na Hulanda, Antiyas, Merca y tambe na Aruba pasobra ningun hende tabata na altura di e supuesto conversacion cu e abogado di Van der Sloot lo tabata tin na un forma no formal cu e fiscal mayor, pa asina duna e fiscal indicacion cu Joran lo tabata sa mucho mas di loke e tabata declara na autoridadnan.

            The viewing of the program here has casued an uproar(furor) in Holland The Antilles America and also in aruba.  The furor itself over the fact that Vander sloots lawyer in an informal discusion with Jansen stated that Vandersloot knows more than what he has declared to the authoritys,

            Abogado di Van Der Sloot na Aruba, señor Carlo a nenga rotundamente cu e lo tabata tin un conversacion no oficial cu fiscal mayor Janssen y cu e a declara cu su cliente lo tabata sa mas di loke e tabata bisa polisnan.

            Senor Carlo the attorney for Vander sloot on Aruba vehemently denies that he has had any conversation with Janssen on declaring that his client knew more info than what he had declared to polis when interrogated.

            Awe e team investigativo di DIARIO ta publica algun parti di documentonan cu a worde haya den e investigacion riba desaparicion di Natalee Halloway y cada ken por lesa pa nan mes awe loke un funcionario policial hulandes a pone riba papel relaciona cu interogacion cu su persona a haci cu Joran van der Sloot.

            Diarios investigative team hs published some parts of the documentation that they have found in reference to the  disappearance in the Natalee Holloway case. This was done so that the pliticals in Holland could read about the interrogation and how Joran Vander sloot was questioned.

            ‘E sospechoso (aki ;Joran van der Sloot) a bisa, manera cu mi ( ‘Mi’ ta e funcionario policial hulandes) a tende, cu el (Joran van der Sloot) a puntra su mama pa tuma contacto telefonico cu e testigo Zedan Arambatzis, pa saca afor kico el a declara na polis’.

            The suspect Joran Vander sloot  had contacted and asked his mother to contact Zendan Arambatis so that Freddy could tell his mother what he declared to the polis when he (Zedan Arambatis was called in for questioning by the polis.

            ‘E sospechoso a conta cu su abogado Carlo, na un forma di den confianza, tambe a tende e storia di e testigo Zedan Arambatzis y cu e abogado a pidi Joran van der Sloot e dia siguiente na un forma ‘casi na yoramento’ pa e bay bisa e berdad’.

            The suspect JVDS contacted his attorney Carlo under quise of a confidential conversation  that he Carlo should also listen to Zedan Arambatis story of the testimony he gave.  It is said the next day that Carlo cried and begged JVDS to please tell the truth.

            ‘E sospechoso a conta cu abogado Carlo a informe (esta informa Joran van der Sloot) cu e testigo Zedan Arambatzis a declara encuanto Fishermanshut’. ‘Van der Sloot a declara cu a base di e informacion aki, el a dicidi di bisa e berdad, esta cu el a laga Natalee atras na Fishermanshut’.

            The suspect asked his attorney Carlo to listen to Zedan Arambatis declaration  and read especially about the testimony ZZedan Arambatis made regarding the fishermans hut.  According to Vander sloot he wanted to tell the truth about the fishermans hut especially being that he JVDS   ( not sure a laga means , i think (he alleges) alleges what he did with Natalee behind the fishermans hut.

            Analisando loke tin poni riba papel di documentonan di interogacion haci door di entre otro polisnan special di Hulanda cu a bin te Aruba pa yuda soluciona e caso di desaparicion di Natalee Halloway, cualkier investigador lo haci e siguiente preguntanan y tambe remarkenan; (1) Di con Joran van der Sloot a pidi su mama pa yama Zedan Arambatzis pa puntra e testigo aki kico el a declara na polis?

            analizing the documents of interrogation and having a special polis task force from Holland analize the documents for aruba could or should have brought forth a solution to the case of Natalee Holloway, any investigators would have known the proper questions to ask and remark upon #1 being why does JVDS want his mother to ask Zedan Arambatis to testify about something which he could easily have stated to polis himself?
            (2) Kico Zedan a declara na e mama di Joran van der Sloot?

            #2 What did Zedan say to JVDS mother about what JVDS told him?

            (3) E mama di Joran van der Sloot a worde interoga basa riba e
            informacionnan aki cu polis mes a pone riba papel?
            #3 Why is it that JVDS mother did not tell interrogators about the info Zedan gave her and why was it not written in a declartion to the investigators?
            (4) Riba ki dia Joran a pidi su mama pa bay averigua declaracion haci door di Zedan Arambatzis y ki dia e mama a yama e testigo aki y kico e testigo aki a declara na e mama di Joran y kende na su turno a informa su yiu di kico e testigo a declara?

            #4 in reference to what date did JVDS ask his mother to go and find out what Zedan Arambatis.s declared to the polis and why wasnt the testimony declared by JOran or his mother when time came to give thier own testimonys and declaration?

            (5) Di con e abogado ta bay puntra e sospechoso Joran, cual ta su cliente, na un forma ‘casi na yoramento’ pa e bisa e berdad?

            #5 Has anyone asked the lawyer for JVDS why he begged and cried for his client to tell the truth?

            (6) Na cua berdad ta worde referi aki?

            #6 if not true- from what refenrence did you derive this?

            (7) E supuesto berdad cu Joran mes ta bisa despues, cu el a laga Natalee atras na Fishermanshut?
            #7 Is it true  what JVDS alleges he did to Natalee behind the fishermans hut?
            (8) Si esey ta e berdad anto no tabata tin nada dje malo ey of dje impactante cu e abogado supuestamente lo mester a pidi Joran van der Sloot ‘casi na yoramento’ pa bisa e berdad?!

            #8 If not true why then is JVDS lawyer crying and begging for him to tell the truth? Imagine the impact it would have had on the case if the question had been asked.

            #9  Re Zedans testimony once Carlo his lawyer heard of it how come it was it under confidential info from client to lawyer since Joran was his client and not Zedan ? Why was this sensative info not made public to the people of Aruba.  Why was the Arubans who had no part or blame in this sad episode made to pay for the mistake of the perpetrators of this crime agaisnt Natalle Holloway A most controversial case in lack of justice for Aruba and the riening Hollanders have come to find out slowly but surely.  the truth will come to light one day.
            (9) Encuanto cu e abogado a tende e storia di e testigo Zedan na un forma di ‘den confianza’ ta habri caminda pa puntra; na unda el a tende e storia aki den confianza y for di ken y ken mas tabata sa di e supuesto storia aki y con bin un abogado a tende esaki ‘den confianza’ siendo cu Joran ta su cliente y cuanto informacion mas estilo ‘den confianza’ a keda scondi y cu te awe henter pueblo di Aruba ta paga e prijs miyonario pa loke pueblo no tin ni arte ni parti den dje ?
            Esakinan ta djis algun observacion den e caso mas controversial cu husticia na Aruba y Reino Hulandes a yega di conoce, pero cu poco poco e berdad ta saliendo na claridad di dia.

            Keda pendiente pa e dianan cu ta bin pasobra tin hopi y hopi mas pa sali y ta hopi pregunta mester bay haya contesta pasobra no por ta asina cu tin preto riba blanco poni, cu por lo menos dos persona a declara na polis kico a pasa cu Natalee unda cu Joran su nomber ta keda bin pa dilanti como e persona cu lo sa kico a pasa cu Natalee of a hunga un rol grandi den henter e caso, anto keto bay autoridadnan hudicial no por presenta un caso penal den corte.[/quote

            Everyone be-aware the day that more and I hope more info will be brought forth.  Lets hope that proper questions and awnsers will come forth.  Something about black ribon turning white  (I dont understand this) but at least two people have declared what happened to Natalee, like Joran who knows what has happened to Natalee and Joran who is playing this hugh role infornt of or for the benefit of the Holland authoritys so that his case will not go infront of the penal court.


            Thats the best I could do , please forgive any mistakes I dont speak papiamento.

            Merry CHRISTmas everyone   may Peace love and Joy fill your hearts this season.


            Title: Lively Case Discussion #553 12/3 - 12/4/2006
            Post by: Ono on December 04, 2006, 07:24:48 PM
            Quote from: "Tylergal"
            Quote from: "Ono"
            Quote from: "San"
            From the Front Page article.

              “The suspect (Joran van der Sloot) said, as I (”I” is the Dutch officer) heard, that he (van der Sloot) asked his mother to contact by phone his witness Zedan Arambatzis, to find out what he told the police”.[/list]
              So Joran was the one who told Anita to contact Freddy.  Freddy was involved with Joran and the Kalpoes know that Freddy is involved and that's why they said Freddy needs to tell the truth.

              Freddy was the one who thought of the lie about the Fisherman's huts and Joran ran with it.  Joran needed to know what Freddy said so his story would be close.

              Through the whole case Joran seems to be worried about his father and Freddy.


              Curious that we haven't heard if Anita was questioned at some point in time and gave any statements...you would certainly think that would have been done as she is up tp her eyeballs in after-after-the-fact!


              Anita, the fixer, the controlling medium.


              Wonder how Anita and Freddy's mother get along ?  And so peculiar we never see the Kalpoes' step-father.


              Title: Lively Case Discussion #553 12/3 - 12/4/2006
              Post by: Kat_Gram on December 04, 2006, 07:25:46 PM
              This passing of information is mentioned in PVDS statements.
              So, they need to find out what  Freddy said, before Joran will say any more.
              .
              Didn't KJ say all this before that Paulus was interferring with a criminal case ? Or, I forgot, he was in the kitchen and didn't hear it.
              .
              And it wasn't his idea, it was his wife's, who BTW is not a lawyer and cannot be disbarred.


              Title: Lively Case Discussion #553 12/3 - 12/4/2006
              Post by: igsigs on December 04, 2006, 07:26:21 PM
              Thanks for the trans...sandy.


              Title: Lively Case Discussion #553 12/3 - 12/4/2006
              Post by: Buckeye on December 04, 2006, 07:29:25 PM
              Quote from: "igsigs"
              Thanks for the trans...sandy.


              Same here.


              Title: Lively Case Discussion #553 12/3 - 12/4/2006
              Post by: Kat_Gram on December 04, 2006, 07:29:57 PM
              Yes Sandy TY.
              This is just getting better and better.
              And I hope that Jossy keeps it up.


              Title: Lively Case Discussion #553 12/3 - 12/4/2006
              Post by: Kat_Gram on December 04, 2006, 07:31:35 PM
              Whne were they thinking of releasing them from " suspicion " ?
              This week or when SinterKlass comes ?


              Title: Lively Case Discussion #553 12/3 - 12/4/2006
              Post by: MuffyBee on December 04, 2006, 07:32:20 PM
              It's sounding more and more like Anita is up to her big white bra in this.


              Title: Lively Case Discussion #553 12/3 - 12/4/2006
              Post by: igsigs on December 04, 2006, 07:38:02 PM
              Quote from: "MuffyBee"
              It's sounding more and more like Anita is up to her big white bra in this.


              lol

              IIRC, there was a Dutch Hasbikos article from waaay back that referred to her as a witness/suspect. I have no link, but i think it is possible that there is a PV from her. At least there should be.


              Title: Lively Case Discussion #553 12/3 - 12/4/2006
              Post by: robots on December 04, 2006, 07:38:40 PM
              Quote from: "MuffyBee"
              It's sounding more and more like Anita is up to her big white bra in this.


              BET THE FARM on that one


              BET the BRA ........too  8)


              Title: Lively Case Discussion #553 12/3 - 12/4/2006
              Post by: robots on December 04, 2006, 07:41:46 PM
              "when the black turned to white"

              all i can think of is...GRAY

              like the color of the skin turned GRAY

              bastards


              Title: Lively Case Discussion #553 12/3 - 12/4/2006
              Post by: MuffyBee on December 04, 2006, 07:42:23 PM
              Quote from: "igsigs"
              Quote from: "MuffyBee"
              It's sounding more and more like Anita is up to her big white bra in this.


              lol

              IIRC, there was a Dutch Hasbikos article from waaay back that referred to her as a witness/suspect. I have no link, but i think it is possible that there is a PV from her. At least there should be.


              Hmm.  Just maybe there needs to be more found out about Anita.   I don't remember very much information available about her.  And she was coming and going to Joran in the jail and etc.  And what really drives me up the wall was this stuff when she supposedly described Natalee's panties:--(.  There is just something really, really wrong with Anita.


              Title: Lively Case Discussion #553 12/3 - 12/4/2006
              Post by: Ono on December 04, 2006, 07:42:26 PM
              Sandy: Merry Christmas to you. Thank you so much for the translation.


              Title: Lively Case Discussion #553 12/3 - 12/4/2006
              Post by: robots on December 04, 2006, 07:42:34 PM
              ANITA knows he is a monster


              she even gave him his own apartment

              she was skerrrrrrrrrrred of him


              Title: Lively Case Discussion #553 12/3 - 12/4/2006
              Post by: MuffyBee on December 04, 2006, 07:44:22 PM
              Quote from: "robots"
              ANITA knows he is a monster


              she even gave him his own apartment

              she was skerrrrrrrrrrred of him

              She probably gave him his own apt. so he wouldn't be mean to his brother all the time.  They had to put him somewhere...


              Title: Lively Case Discussion #553 12/3 - 12/4/2006
              Post by: MuffyBee on December 04, 2006, 07:46:56 PM
              I still would like to know a lot more about Anita and just what her role has been in the background.  While our focus has been on other players, what has she been doing?  What strings was she pulling?  Was she carrying messages?  Interviewing?  Covering tracks up like a cat in a litter box?


              Title: Lively Case Discussion #553 12/3 - 12/4/2006
              Post by: Carnut on December 04, 2006, 07:50:49 PM
              Quote from: "MuffyBee"
              I still would like to know a lot more about Anita and just what her role has been in the background.  While our focus has been on other players, what has she been doing?  What strings was she pulling?  Was she carrying messages?  Interviewing?  Covering tracks up like a cat in a litter box?


              Yep, all the above and more I'm sure.


              Title: Lively Case Discussion #553 12/3 - 12/4/2006
              Post by: Ono on December 04, 2006, 07:52:32 PM
              de Vries should have enough material to go with four more programs at least.


              Title: Lively Case Discussion #553 12/3 - 12/4/2006
              Post by: MuffyBee on December 04, 2006, 07:53:39 PM
              I was just reading back and saw an interview on "Nova" with Paulus and Anita.  And they both called Natalee "that girl".   :evil:


              Title: Lively Case Discussion #553 12/3 - 12/4/2006
              Post by: Ono on December 04, 2006, 07:57:27 PM
              Quote from: "MuffyBee"
              Quote from: "igsigs"
              Quote from: "MuffyBee"
              It's sounding more and more like Anita is up to her big white bra in this.


              lol

              IIRC, there was a Dutch Hasbikos article from waaay back that referred to her as a witness/suspect. I have no link, but i think it is possible that there is a PV from her. At least there should be.


              Hmm.  Just maybe there needs to be more found out about Anita.   I don't remember very much information available about her.  And she was coming and going to Joran in the jail and etc.  And what really drives me up the wall was this stuff when she supposedly described Natalee's panties:--(.  There is just something really, really wrong with Anita.


              I'm curious as to how she and Paulus hooked up in the first place, and what that story is.


              Title: Lively Case Discussion #553 12/3 - 12/4/2006
              Post by: San on December 04, 2006, 07:57:40 PM
              Quote from: "robots"
              ANITA knows he is a monster


              she even gave him his own apartment

              she was skerrrrrrrrrrred of him

              I agree that Anita was afraid of Joran.  She wanted him away from her other two sons.  Mother knows best she rasied the monster.


              Title: Lively Case Discussion #553 12/3 - 12/4/2006
              Post by: Ono on December 04, 2006, 07:58:21 PM
              Quote from: "MuffyBee"
              I was just reading back and saw an interview on "Nova" with Paulus and Anita.  And they both called Natalee "that girl".   :evil:


              It's so coarse and unfeeling.


              Title: Lively Case Discussion #553 12/3 - 12/4/2006
              Post by: San on December 04, 2006, 07:59:57 PM
              Quote from: "MuffyBee"
              I was just reading back and saw an interview on "Nova" with Paulus and Anita.  And they both called Natalee "that girl".   :evil:

              They always do.  They can never refer to Natalee by her name.  The Kalpoes say in their statement how is the girl.


              Title: Lively Case Discussion #553 12/3 - 12/4/2006
              Post by: MuffyBee on December 04, 2006, 08:00:31 PM
              Yes Ono.  I'm curious too.  There just isn't a whole lot we seem to know about Paulus or Anita.  Heaven knows all kinds of details were splashed across the pages about Beth, Jug, Robin, Dave and the rest, many untrue.  Remember when someone even brought up that Natalee's brother got a new truck and there was discussion about where the money came from for it?  And it turned out I think it was the grandparents that helped buy it.  And he needed it to get to and from school and work?  As IF it were anyone's business in the first place.  But just what do we know about Anita?  And what has she been saying/doing all this time?


              Title: Lively Case Discussion #553 12/3 - 12/4/2006
              Post by: Ono on December 04, 2006, 08:01:48 PM
              Well, I'd like to know whether or not there are any connections to Hitler in any of Anita's or Paulus' families ?


              Title: Lively Case Discussion #553 12/3 - 12/4/2006
              Post by: MuffyBee on December 04, 2006, 08:01:58 PM
              Quote from: "Ono"
              Quote from: "MuffyBee"
              I was just reading back and saw an interview on "Nova" with Paulus and Anita.  And they both called Natalee "that girl".   :evil:


              It's so coarse and unfeeling.


              I'd like to see a psychological profile on Anita done by a professional.


              Title: Lively Case Discussion #553 12/3 - 12/4/2006
              Post by: Kat_Gram on December 04, 2006, 08:02:41 PM
              I've had my mind in this case for quite a while and intensely so since Devries.
              Last night, I put myself in the place of a girl who is in a moving car with 3 creeps who start assaulting her. They are travelling a deserted area and it is dark. She can guess what is going to happen next as they are heading in a direction away from where she thought hey were going.
              The car stops as the driver has to go to the washroom. ( Arashi )She struggles and manages to get out of the car and starts to run for her life. She falls. She gets back up. And starts to run again. She can hear
              the Dutch guy calling her and she runs faster. He catches up with her.
              This point is in between Arashi and the Huts.
              Joran catches up to her and she is down in the sand.
              { use your imagination  }
              ...
              Afterwards, Joran continues along the beach until he gets to the first place where he can get up to the street.
              What cell tower picked up that call to Deepak, there was noise so he was at the outer edge of the raduis.
              He uses his phone to call Deepak for a ride. He finds out that Deepak has gone home because he didn't  know what else to do.
              ...
              He knows where Freddy is, he tries to find him or Guido.
              ...
              This to me explains why Deepak waits for Joran. He didn't drop him off like he said, the girl got out of the car and ran and Joran ran after her.
              Deepak does wait at the beach then he drives and looks around, but he can't see anything, so he goes home with Satish. And waits for Joran to call.
               
              IMO It has nevr been discussed where Natalee escaped from the car and was caught.
              Deepak can't exactly remember what road he turned down when he dropped them off. Because he didn't.


              Title: Lively Case Discussion #553 12/3 - 12/4/2006
              Post by: MuffyBee on December 04, 2006, 08:04:26 PM
              Quote from: "Ono"
              Well, I'd like to know whether or not there are any connections to Hitler in any of Anita's or Paulus' families ?


              That Hitler thing...It just SO rings like something someone of the Van der Sloot's ilk would come up with.  Yes, Hitler was a bad man alright.  It sounds like more of a European thing.  Not something Natalee would say.  I think that Hitler thing was just another big fat ole lie.  And the worst part of it was some of the follow up about it, like asking Beth if she was related to Hitler.  What a bunch of dolts!


              Title: Lively Case Discussion #553 12/3 - 12/4/2006
              Post by: MuffyBee on December 04, 2006, 08:06:47 PM
              I see what you mean Kat.  But there has been so much discussion and trying to figure out if and when they went to the beach or not.  And where and when and if and over and over.  What you post is very interesting.


              Title: Lively Case Discussion #553 12/3 - 12/4/2006
              Post by: Ono on December 04, 2006, 08:07:16 PM
              Quote from: "MuffyBee"
              Yes Ono.  I'm curious too.  There just isn't a whole lot we seem to know about Paulus or Anita.  Heaven knows all kinds of details were splashed across the pages about Beth, Jug, Robin, Dave and the rest, many untrue.  Remember when someone even brought up that Natalee's brother got a new truck and there was discussion about where the money came from for it?  And it turned out I think it was the grandparents that helped buy it.  And he needed it to get to and from school and work?  As IF it were anyone's business in the first place.  But just what do we know about Anita?  And what has she been saying/doing all this time?


              Oh yes, you are so right---Natalee's family has been spared no mercy by small & evil-minded slanderering pinheads.

              I have always been curious about the personal backgrounds of both Sloots.


              Title: Lively Case Discussion #553 12/3 - 12/4/2006
              Post by: Jacqueline on December 04, 2006, 08:07:31 PM
              Quote from: "MuffyBee"
              Quote from: "Ono"
              Well, I'd like to know whether or not there are any connections to Hitler in any of Anita's or Paulus' families ?


              That Hitler thing...It just SO rings like something someone of the Van der Sloot's ilk would come up with.  Yes, Hitler was a bad man alright.  It sounds like more of a European thing.  Not something Natalee would say.  I think that Hitler thing was just another big fat ole lie.  And the worst part of it was some of the follow up about it, like asking Beth if she was related to Hitler.  What a bunch of dolts!


              Agreed!

              I am hard pressed to believe that an American teen would come up with the Hitler reference.


              Title: Lively Case Discussion #553 12/3 - 12/4/2006
              Post by: igsigs on December 04, 2006, 08:08:41 PM
              Quote from: "Ono"
              Well, I'd like to know whether or not there are any connections to Hitler in any of Anita's or Paulus' families ?

              Anita is German. As for being Adolf's kin...prolly a longshot. But much more likely than somebody from the American south. KJ is a doofus.


              Title: Lively Case Discussion #553 12/3 - 12/4/2006
              Post by: Carnut on December 04, 2006, 08:09:59 PM
              Quote from: "MuffyBee"
              Quote from: "Ono"
              Well, I'd like to know whether or not there are any connections to Hitler in any of Anita's or Paulus' families ?


              That Hitler thing...It just SO rings like something someone of the Van der Sloot's ilk would come up with.  Yes, Hitler was a bad man alright.  It sounds like more of a European thing.  Not something Natalee would say.  I think that Hitler thing was just another big fat ole lie.  And the worst part of it was some of the follow up about it, like asking Beth if she was related to Hitler.  What a bunch of dolts!


              Stupid is as stupid does, mama used to say.


              Title: Lively Case Discussion #553 12/3 - 12/4/2006
              Post by: Ono on December 04, 2006, 08:11:36 PM
              Quote from: "MuffyBee"
              Quote from: "Ono"
              Well, I'd like to know whether or not there are any connections to Hitler in any of Anita's or Paulus' families ?


              That Hitler thing...It just SO rings like something someone of the Van der Sloot's ilk would come up with.  Yes, Hitler was a bad man alright.  It sounds like more of a European thing.  Not something Natalee would say.  I think that Hitler thing was just another big fat ole lie.  And the worst part of it was some of the follow up about it, like asking Beth if she was related to Hitler.  What a bunch of dolts!


              Straight out of a European mind & imagination, no doubt about it....NOT from Natalee.


              Title: Lively Case Discussion #553 12/3 - 12/4/2006
              Post by: Kat_Gram on December 04, 2006, 08:12:29 PM
              Quote from: "robots"
              Quote from: "klaasend"
              Quote from: "robots"
              does anyone have a picture of JORAN missing his front teeth ??

              cause i think thats what youre gonna see pretty soon


              i can sense it  8)


              (http://i37.photobucket.com/albums/e82/klaasend2/JOranTeeth.jpg)


              thanks

              maybe knock out another couple


              we will be getting a PREVIEW of whats to come
               8)

              what about Anita with NO teeth
              I am very anrgy again over that woman's lying.


              Title: Lively Case Discussion #553 12/3 - 12/4/2006
              Post by: San on December 04, 2006, 08:13:05 PM
              Quote from: "MuffyBee"
              Quote from: "Ono"
              Well, I'd like to know whether or not there are any connections to Hitler in any of Anita's or Paulus' families ?


              That Hitler thing...It just SO rings like something someone of the Van der Sloot's ilk would come up with.  Yes, Hitler was a bad man alright.  It sounds like more of a European thing.  Not something Natalee would say.  I think that Hitler thing was just another big fat ole lie.  And the worst part of it was some of the follow up about it, like asking Beth if she was related to Hitler.  What a bunch of dolts!

              Just like the slave comment.  That was a Vam der Sloot thing also.  Natalee never said that.  But I bet the Sloots have said it often.


              Title: Lively Case Discussion #553 12/3 - 12/4/2006
              Post by: Carnut on December 04, 2006, 08:13:07 PM
              Quote from: "Ono"
              Quote from: "MuffyBee"
              Quote from: "Ono"
              Well, I'd like to know whether or not there are any connections to Hitler in any of Anita's or Paulus' families ?


              That Hitler thing...It just SO rings like something someone of the Van der Sloot's ilk would come up with.  Yes, Hitler was a bad man alright.  It sounds like more of a European thing.  Not something Natalee would say.  I think that Hitler thing was just another big fat ole lie.  And the worst part of it was some of the follow up about it, like asking Beth if she was related to Hitler.  What a bunch of dolts!


              Straight out of a European mind & imagination, no doubt about it....NOT from Natalee.


              Absolutely.


              Title: Lively Case Discussion #553 12/3 - 12/4/2006
              Post by: Kat_Gram on December 04, 2006, 08:14:31 PM
              Quote from: "igsigs"
              Quote from: "Ono"
              Well, I'd like to know whether or not there are any connections to Hitler in any of Anita's or Paulus' families ?

              Anita is German. As for being Adolf's kin...prolly a longshot. But much more likely than somebody from the American south. KJ is a doofus.

              I did not known she was German. Maybe there is a drunk or two in her family. There things do run along those lines..


              Title: Lively Case Discussion #553 12/3 - 12/4/2006
              Post by: Carnut on December 04, 2006, 08:15:10 PM
              Quote from: "San"
              Quote from: "MuffyBee"
              Quote from: "Ono"
              Well, I'd like to know whether or not there are any connections to Hitler in any of Anita's or Paulus' families ?


              That Hitler thing...It just SO rings like something someone of the Van der Sloot's ilk would come up with.  Yes, Hitler was a bad man alright.  It sounds like more of a European thing.  Not something Natalee would say.  I think that Hitler thing was just another big fat ole lie.  And the worst part of it was some of the follow up about it, like asking Beth if she was related to Hitler.  What a bunch of dolts!

              Just like the slave comment.  That was a Vam der Sloot thing also.  Natalee never said that.  But I bet the Sloots have said it often.


              I've sometimes wondered if the real reason that PVDS wouldn't let the ALE search the rest of the sloot premises was just that he didn't want any of the 'lower class' folks messing around on his property.


              Title: Lively Case Discussion #553 12/3 - 12/4/2006
              Post by: MuffyBee on December 04, 2006, 08:15:10 PM
              Whoo-eeee.  Anita without teeth?  That would just about complete the ensemble wouldn't it?  Man, you are already lookin at high fashion!  NOT


              Title: Lively Case Discussion #553 12/3 - 12/4/2006
              Post by: MuffyBee on December 04, 2006, 08:17:56 PM
              Quote from: "MuffyBee"
              Whoo-eeee.  Anita without teeth?  That would just about complete the ensemble wouldn't it?  Man, you are already lookin at high fashion!  NOT


              aaack!  That reminded me of that line in "Deliverance":  "You shore gotta purty mouth".  Yep.  Anita is about piggy faced and butt ugly.  I am just so fed up with the lying


              Title: Lively Case Discussion #553 12/3 - 12/4/2006
              Post by: Kat_Gram on December 04, 2006, 08:18:43 PM
              Hey, the lowest class lives there.


              Title: Lively Case Discussion #553 12/3 - 12/4/2006
              Post by: MuffyBee on December 04, 2006, 08:20:11 PM
              Quote from: "Kat_Gram"
              Hey, the lowest class lives there.


              Class is as class does.  And there are some with no class atall...


              Title: Lively Case Discussion #553 12/3 - 12/4/2006
              Post by: Ono on December 04, 2006, 08:20:59 PM
              Quote from: "igsigs"
              Quote from: "Ono"
              Well, I'd like to know whether or not there are any connections to Hitler in any of Anita's or Paulus' families ?

              Anita is German. As for being Adolf's kin...prolly a longshot. But much more likely than somebody from the American south. KJ is a doofus.


              I can easily see Anita then, throwing that derogatory slam at Beth, while sitting around the homefires, trying to think up slander to repeat as fact.


              Title: Lively Case Discussion #553 12/3 - 12/4/2006
              Post by: Kat_Gram on December 04, 2006, 08:21:45 PM
              In this day and age, think Natalee would have used some other reference if she used it. Hitler is still discussed in Holland and hated for what they did to the country and citizens. Anita / Paulus would have heard stories from their parents.


              Title: Lively Case Discussion #553 12/3 - 12/4/2006
              Post by: Ono on December 04, 2006, 08:24:50 PM
              Quote from: "Kat_Gram"
              In this day and age, think Natalee would have used some other reference if she used it. Hitler is still discussed in Holland and hated for what they did to the country and citizens. Anita / Paulus would have heard stories from their parents.


              Wonder what, if any, connection to the Third Reich, any of their forebears/relatives had ?


              Title: Lively Case Discussion #553 12/3 - 12/4/2006
              Post by: MuffyBee on December 04, 2006, 08:26:47 PM
              But remember when Beth had to endure that interview, she was actually asked if she was related to Hitler?  It is unbelievable.  And just goes to show what a bunch of idiots were running things.  Supposedly Natalee told Joran her mother was Hitler's sister or something?  And then that ends up being a question for the mother of a missing girl.  Now how in the world did that happen?


              Title: Lively Case Discussion #553 12/3 - 12/4/2006
              Post by: Kat_Gram on December 04, 2006, 08:29:05 PM
              Quote from: "Ono"
              Quote from: "Kat_Gram"
              In this day and age, think Natalee would have used some other reference if she used it. Hitler is still discussed in Holland and hated for what they did to the country and citizens. Anita / Paulus would have heard stories from their parents.


              Wonder what, if any, connection to the Third Reich, any of their forebears/relatives had ?

              Oh you are a devil. You want me to say something very bad, don't you ?


              Title: Lively Case Discussion #553 12/3 - 12/4/2006
              Post by: Florida on December 04, 2006, 08:29:11 PM
              Where is GRANDE?
              Haven't seen him around??????


              Title: Lively Case Discussion #553 12/3 - 12/4/2006
              Post by: klaasend on December 04, 2006, 08:33:27 PM
              Quote from: "Florida"
              Where is GRANDE?
              Haven't seen him around??????

              Grande is working behind the scenes, don't worry about him  :wink:


              Title: Lively Case Discussion #553 12/3 - 12/4/2006
              Post by: Kat_Gram on December 04, 2006, 08:33:35 PM
              For our amusement until we hear more, we can pick out presents for the festive season for the Sloots.
              A dog run would be nice for Joran.
              Something NOT see thru would be nice for Anita. That look is so passe for a woman her age and build.
              For the Man of the House, how about a spine. Some heart, some courage.
              Some truth.
              Paintball guns for the dogs who are nervous any time Joran is home.


              Title: Lively Case Discussion #553 12/3 - 12/4/2006
              Post by: MuffyBee on December 04, 2006, 08:37:22 PM
              Maybe get a multi-pack of consciences for the whole famn-damily


              Title: Lively Case Discussion #553 12/3 - 12/4/2006
              Post by: Tylergal on December 04, 2006, 08:38:00 PM
              Quote from: "MuffyBee"
              It's sounding more and more like Anita is up to her big white bra in this.


              Am I the only one who recalls the episode of Law & Order, (loosely based on Natalee Holloway case) that suggests Anita was one of the main players, if it was in fact based on anything they knew that we do not know pubicly.


              Title: Lively Case Discussion #553 12/3 - 12/4/2006
              Post by: Tylergal on December 04, 2006, 08:38:54 PM
              Quote from: "MuffyBee"
              Quote from: "igsigs"
              Quote from: "MuffyBee"
              It's sounding more and more like Anita is up to her big white bra in this.


              lol

              IIRC, there was a Dutch Hasbikos article from waaay back that referred to her as a witness/suspect. I have no link, but i think it is possible that there is a PV from her. At least there should be.


              Hmm.  Just maybe there needs to be more found out about Anita.   I don't remember very much information available about her.  And she was coming and going to Joran in the jail and etc.  And what really drives me up the wall was this stuff when she supposedly described Natalee's panties:--(.  There is just something really, really wrong with Anita.


              She may have helped move the body on her return from Holland and kept Natalee's panties as a souvenir.


              Title: Lively Case Discussion #553 12/3 - 12/4/2006
              Post by: MuffyBee on December 04, 2006, 08:39:49 PM
              Or maybe some of the dummies books.  The titles could be endless:


              Title: Lively Case Discussion #553 12/3 - 12/4/2006
              Post by: Tylergal on December 04, 2006, 08:40:39 PM
              Quote from: "MuffyBee"
              Quote from: "Ono"
              Well, I'd like to know whether or not there are any connections to Hitler in any of Anita's or Paulus' families ?


              That Hitler thing...It just SO rings like something someone of the Van der Sloot's ilk would come up with.  Yes, Hitler was a bad man alright.  It sounds like more of a European thing.  Not something Natalee would say.  I think that Hitler thing was just another big fat ole lie.  And the worst part of it was some of the follow up about it, like asking Beth if she was related to Hitler.  What a bunch of dolts!


              I am sure that was an Anita line. I  would almost bet my last black bra on it.


              Title: Lively Case Discussion #553 12/3 - 12/4/2006
              Post by: MuffyBee on December 04, 2006, 08:41:04 PM
              Quote from: "Tylergal"
              Quote from: "MuffyBee"
              It's sounding more and more like Anita is up to her big white bra in this.


              Am I the only one who recalls the episode of Law & Order, (loosely based on Natalee Holloway case) that suggests Anita was one of the main players, if it was in fact based on anything they knew that we do not know pubicly.

              I vaguely recall something like that Tyler.


              Title: Lively Case Discussion #553 12/3 - 12/4/2006
              Post by: Jacqueline on December 04, 2006, 08:41:08 PM
              Quote from: "Tylergal"
              Quote from: "MuffyBee"
              It's sounding more and more like Anita is up to her big white bra in this.


              Am I the only one who recalls the episode of Law & Order, (loosely based on Natalee Holloway case) that suggests Anita was one of the main players, if it was in fact based on anything they knew that we do not know pubicly.


              I remember it well.


              Title: Lively Case Discussion #553 12/3 - 12/4/2006
              Post by: nonesuche on December 04, 2006, 08:45:09 PM
              Hi All-

              Finally Anita's true colors are exposed, how many months now? Really I think part of their indignation has been that some dirty american family could ever "do this" to them and theirs? Anita is an elitist wannabe of the first order. Don't you remember her striding out with her son at his release, puffed up big and smiling broad.

              She has no conscience and no morality, the world of she and her son revolves around them.


              Title: Lively Case Discussion #553 12/3 - 12/4/2006
              Post by: Tylergal on December 04, 2006, 08:46:08 PM
              Quote from: "San"
              Quote from: "MuffyBee"
              Quote from: "Ono"
              Well, I'd like to know whether or not there are any connections to Hitler in any of Anita's or Paulus' families ?


              That Hitler thing...It just SO rings like something someone of the Van der Sloot's ilk would come up with.  Yes, Hitler was a bad man alright.  It sounds like more of a European thing.  Not something Natalee would say.  I think that Hitler thing was just another big fat ole lie.  And the worst part of it was some of the follow up about it, like asking Beth if she was related to Hitler.  What a bunch of dolts!

              Just like the slave comment.  That was a Vam der Sloot thing also.  Natalee never said that.  But I bet the Sloots have said it often.


              Yes, we found that website where Joran called Kees his "nigga."


              Title: Lively Case Discussion #553 12/3 - 12/4/2006
              Post by: Kat_Gram on December 04, 2006, 08:51:06 PM
              The whole family is lacking.


              Title: Lively Case Discussion #553 12/3 - 12/4/2006
              Post by: MuffyBee on December 04, 2006, 08:52:21 PM
              Quote from: "nonesuche"
              Hi All-

              Finally Anita's true colors are exposed, how many months now? Really I think part of their indignation has been that some dirty american family could ever "do this" to them and theirs? Anita is an elitist wannabe of the first order. Don't you remember her striding out with her son at his release, puffed up big and smiling broad.

              She has no conscience and no morality, the world of she and her son revolves around them.


              Her true colors exposed?  More like her danged ugly granny bra exposed!  Hi None!  You speak many truths in your post here.


              Title: Lively Case Discussion #553 12/3 - 12/4/2006
              Post by: Florida on December 04, 2006, 08:52:26 PM
              Quote from: "klaasend"
              Quote from: "Florida"
              Where is GRANDE?
              Haven't seen him around??????

              Grande is working behind the scenes, don't worry about him  :wink:

              Where??


              Title: Lively Case Discussion #553 12/3 - 12/4/2006
              Post by: klaasend on December 04, 2006, 09:00:13 PM
              Quote from: "Florida"
              Quote from: "klaasend"
              Quote from: "Florida"
              Where is GRANDE?
              Haven't seen him around??????

              Grande is working behind the scenes, don't worry about him  :wink:

              Where??

              I said behind the scenes which could mean he's not posting in any open forum.  Why don't you email and ask him?


              Title: Lively Case Discussion #553 12/3 - 12/4/2006
              Post by: San on December 04, 2006, 09:00:26 PM
              Quote from: "nonesuche"
              Hi All-

              Finally Anita's true colors are exposed, how many months now? Really I think part of their indignation has been that some dirty american family could ever "do this" to them and theirs? Anita is an elitist wannabe of the first order. Don't you remember her striding out with her son at his release, puffed up big and smiling broad.

              She has no conscience and no morality, the world of she and her son revolves around them.

              Yes, I do remember that.  Every time I see her in that video she makes me sick.  She is so proud of the psychopath she raised.  So proud that he murdered a girl in her home.  I hope she gets struck by lightening.


              Title: Lively Case Discussion #553 12/3 - 12/4/2006
              Post by: robots on December 04, 2006, 09:00:34 PM
              GRETA !!!!

              you still inclined to believe your BUDDY now ???

              huh ???

              well are you GRETA ???????

              GRETA... im talking to you.........cause i know you read here!!

              still INCLINED???

              HUH ??   HUH ???  ARE YA ????

              im inclined to believe youre a FOOL !!!!!!!!!


              you added to the LIST of people i think are MORONS

              and youre getting closer to the I HATE EM ALL LIST


              Title: Lively Case Discussion #553 12/3 - 12/4/2006
              Post by: robots on December 04, 2006, 09:01:14 PM
              Quote from: "San"
              Quote from: "nonesuche"
              Hi All-

              Finally Anita's true colors are exposed, how many months now? Really I think part of their indignation has been that some dirty american family could ever "do this" to them and theirs? Anita is an elitist wannabe of the first order. Don't you remember her striding out with her son at his release, puffed up big and smiling broad.

              She has no conscience and no morality, the world of she and her son revolves around them.

              Yes, I do remember that.  Every time I see her in that video she makes me sick.  She is so proud of the psychopath she raised.  So proud that he murdered a girl in her home.  I hope she gets struck by lightening.




               :shock:  :shock:  :shock:  :shock:

              youre sounding more like me  8)  8)  8)  8)


              Title: Lively Case Discussion #553 12/3 - 12/4/2006
              Post by: robots on December 04, 2006, 09:02:28 PM
              REMEMBER this thread will LOCK at page 50




               :twisted:  :twisted:  :twisted:  :twisted:  :twisted:  :twisted:


              Title: Lively Case Discussion #553 12/3 - 12/4/2006
              Post by: San on December 04, 2006, 09:03:51 PM
              Quote from: "robots"
              Quote from: "San"
              Quote from: "nonesuche"
              Hi All-

              Finally Anita's true colors are exposed, how many months now? Really I think part of their indignation has been that some dirty american family could ever "do this" to them and theirs? Anita is an elitist wannabe of the first order. Don't you remember her striding out with her son at his release, puffed up big and smiling broad.

              She has no conscience and no morality, the world of she and her son revolves around them.

              Yes, I do remember that.  Every time I see her in that video she makes me sick.  She is so proud of the psychopath she raised.  So proud that he murdered a girl in her home.  I hope she gets struck by lightening.


               :shock:  :shock:  :shock:  :shock:

              youre sounding more like me  8)  8)  8)  8)

               :lol:  :lol:


              Title: Lively Case Discussion #553 12/3 - 12/4/2006
              Post by: Tylergal on December 04, 2006, 09:04:55 PM
              Quote from: "nonesuche"
              Hi All-

              Finally Anita's true colors are exposed, how many months now? Really I think part of their indignation has been that some dirty american family could ever "do this" to them and theirs? Anita is an elitist wannabe of the first order. Don't you remember her striding out with her son at his release, puffed up big and smiling broad.

              She has no conscience and no morality, the world of she and her son revolves around them.


              None, go back and watch that interview.  She sucks air through her canine next to her eye tooth.


              Title: Lively Case Discussion #553 12/3 - 12/4/2006
              Post by: klaasend on December 04, 2006, 09:08:00 PM
              Quote from: "robots"
              REMEMBER this thread will LOCK at page 50




               :twisted:  :twisted:  :twisted:  :twisted:  :twisted:  :twisted:


              (http://i37.photobucket.com/albums/e82/klaasend2/threadlock.jpg)


              Title: Lively Case Discussion #553 12/3 - 12/4/2006
              Post by: robots on December 04, 2006, 09:08:29 PM
              Quote from: "klaasend"
              Quote from: "robots"
              REMEMBER this thread will LOCK at page 50




               :twisted:  :twisted:  :twisted:  :twisted:  :twisted:  :twisted:


              (http://i37.photobucket.com/albums/e82/klaasend2/threadlock.jpg)



               :lol:  :lol:  :lol:


              Title: Lively Case Discussion #553 12/3 - 12/4/2006
              Post by: San on December 04, 2006, 09:08:40 PM
              Quote from: "Tylergal"
              Quote from: "nonesuche"
              Hi All-

              Finally Anita's true colors are exposed, how many months now? Really I think part of their indignation has been that some dirty american family could ever "do this" to them and theirs? Anita is an elitist wannabe of the first order. Don't you remember her striding out with her son at his release, puffed up big and smiling broad.

              She has no conscience and no morality, the world of she and her son revolves around them.


              None, go back and watch that interview.  She sucks air through her canine next to her eye tooth.

              Gee if you asked me to do that I would think it was a punishment  :lol: .


              Title: Lively Case Discussion #553 12/3 - 12/4/2006
              Post by: robots on December 04, 2006, 09:09:03 PM
              klass, i was just trying to help

              you know, thought you might be napping  :wink:


              Title: Lively Case Discussion #553 12/3 - 12/4/2006
              Post by: klaasend on December 04, 2006, 09:10:26 PM
              Quote from: "robots"
              klass, i was just trying to help

              you know, thought you might be napping  :wink:

              Nope, not napping  :lol:  I've had to do some work on my PC today though so I've been a little distracted.  Also, earlier today I had a dentist appointment and I was awol  :wink:


              Title: Lively Case Discussion #553 12/3 - 12/4/2006
              Post by: Jacqueline on December 04, 2006, 09:11:11 PM
              Good evening.

              Any coverage that we know of on Greta 2 nite?

              TIA


              Title: Lively Case Discussion #553 12/3 - 12/4/2006
              Post by: klaasend on December 04, 2006, 09:14:20 PM
              Quote from: "Jacqueline"
              Good evening.

              Any coverage that we know of on Greta 2 nite?

              TIA

              Nope, but I wouldn't be surprised.  I'm going to try to watch anyway.


              Title: Lively Case Discussion #553 12/3 - 12/4/2006
              Post by: Jacqueline on December 04, 2006, 09:15:17 PM
              Quote from: "klaasend"
              Quote from: "Jacqueline"
              Good evening.

              Any coverage that we know of on Greta 2 nite?

              TIA

              Nope, but I wouldn't be surprised.  I'm going to try to watch anyway.


              I just have a feeling after last night, something may be on too.


              Title: Lively Case Discussion #553 12/3 - 12/4/2006
              Post by: Lala'sMom on December 04, 2006, 09:15:38 PM
              Good evening monkeys all.  Hope everyone is doing well.


              Title: Lively Case Discussion #553 12/3 - 12/4/2006
              Post by: robots on December 04, 2006, 09:16:14 PM
              Quote from: "klaasend"
              Quote from: "robots"
              klass, i was just trying to help

              you know, thought you might be napping  :wink:

              Nope, not napping  :lol:  I've had to do some work on my PC today though so I've been a little distracted.  Also, earlier today I had a dentist appointment and I was awol  :wink:



              whewwwwwwwwwwww


              glad youre ok

              i think joran will need a dentist soon  8)


              Title: Lively Case Discussion #553 12/3 - 12/4/2006
              Post by: Kat_Gram on December 04, 2006, 09:18:36 PM
              Quote from: "robots"
              Quote from: "klaasend"
              Quote from: "robots"
              klass, i was just trying to help

              you know, thought you might be napping  :wink:

              Nope, not napping  :lol:  I've had to do some work on my PC today though so I've been a little distracted.  Also, earlier today I had a dentist appointment and I was awol  :wink:



              whewwwwwwwwwwww


              glad youre ok

              i think joran will need a dentist soon  8)

              You are so cute and funny Robots.
              pa Anita lies.


              Title: Lively Case Discussion #553 12/3 - 12/4/2006
              Post by: robots on December 04, 2006, 09:19:24 PM
              Quote from: "Kat_Gram"
              Quote from: "robots"
              Quote from: "klaasend"
              Quote from: "robots"
              klass, i was just trying to help

              you know, thought you might be napping  :wink:

              Nope, not napping  :lol:  I've had to do some work on my PC today though so I've been a little distracted.  Also, earlier today I had a dentist appointment and I was awol  :wink:



              whewwwwwwwwwwww


              glad youre ok

              i think joran will need a dentist soon  8)

              You are so cute and funny Robots.
              pa Anita lies.


              the are the LIAR FAMILY

              i hate em all  8)


              Title: Lively Case Discussion #553 12/3 - 12/4/2006
              Post by: Kat_Gram on December 04, 2006, 09:19:56 PM
              Don't you wish they would all go on a cruise ?
              In a submarine.
              With no air.


              Title: Lively Case Discussion #553 12/3 - 12/4/2006
              Post by: robots on December 04, 2006, 09:20:12 PM
              Quote from: "Kat_Gram"
              Quote from: "robots"
              Quote from: "klaasend"
              Quote from: "robots"
              klass, i was just trying to help

              you know, thought you might be napping  :wink:

              Nope, not napping  :lol:  I've had to do some work on my PC today though so I've been a little distracted.  Also, earlier today I had a dentist appointment and I was awol  :wink:



              whewwwwwwwwwwww


              glad youre ok

              i think joran will need a dentist soon  8)

              You are so cute and funny Robots.
              pa Anita lies.


              funny -yes

              cute--- im a hunk





              OF METAL




               :twisted:  :twisted:  :twisted:  :twisted:


              Title: Lively Case Discussion #553 12/3 - 12/4/2006
              Post by: LilPuma on December 04, 2006, 09:22:10 PM
              Quote from: "nonesuche"
              Hi All-

              Finally Anita's true colors are exposed, how many months now? Really I think part of their indignation has been that some dirty american family could ever "do this" to them and theirs? Anita is an elitist wannabe of the first order. Don't you remember her striding out with her son at his release, puffed up big and smiling broad.

              She has no conscience and no morality, the world of she and her son revolves around them.


              Hmmm, Anita.  I think of her saying "there's no telling what this family will do" when they were in NY.  I remember her being SOOOOOOOOOO condescending in her comments toward Beth in her interview with Kimberly last winter.  I remember Greta telling us Anita described Joran's sexual activities with Natalee, including her underwear.  I remember Joran rubbing her neck and shoulder when he was released as they stepped up to the mike to address the cheering throng of supporters.  I now need some Pepto.    :?


              Title: Lively Case Discussion #553 12/3 - 12/4/2006
              Post by: klaasend on December 04, 2006, 09:23:23 PM
              (http://i37.photobucket.com/albums/e82/klaasend2/PURPLEPIMPS.gif)


              Title: Lively Case Discussion #553 12/3 - 12/4/2006
              Post by: Kat_Gram on December 04, 2006, 09:23:45 PM
              "and if you discuss the case, you can leave "


              Title: Lively Case Discussion #553 12/3 - 12/4/2006
              Post by: robots on December 04, 2006, 09:24:40 PM
              yes, the SLOOOTERS attempt to FORGET that it was JORAN who STARTED
              with the LIES and  multiple BOGUS changes in the stories from the GET GO



              NEWSFLASH for the SLOOOOOOOOTERS


               robotic monkeys never FORGET  8)


              Title: Lively Case Discussion #553 12/3 - 12/4/2006
              Post by: Kat_Gram on December 04, 2006, 09:25:00 PM
              "  I am reading the Bible, Mumma "


              Title: Lively Case Discussion #553 12/3 - 12/4/2006
              Post by: robots on December 04, 2006, 09:25:18 PM
              Quote from: "klaasend"
              (http://i37.photobucket.com/albums/e82/klaasend2/PURPLEPIMPS.gif)



              hot tea all over the DESK


              get the CLEAN UP CREW


              Title: Lively Case Discussion #553 12/3 - 12/4/2006
              Post by: 2NJSons_Mom on December 04, 2006, 09:25:48 PM
              Quote from: sandy leiva
              Quote from: "klaasend"
              http://www.diario-aruba.com/2006/12/4/


              good day monkey friends- will attempt to translate for you.

              Documentonan policial ta mustra; ABOGADO DI JORAN VAN DER SLOOT a PIDI JORAN ‘CASI NA YORAMENTO’ PA BISA E BERDAD

              Political document shows; Joran van dersloots lawyer begs joran , practicall crying out for Joran to tell the truth.

              ORANJESTAD (AAN) --- Recientemente un reportero investigativo na Hulanda a sacodi un rato e caso di Natalee Halloway ora cu den su programa special na television nan a bin saca afor, cu supuestamente abogado di Van Der Sloot a papia cu Fiscal Mayor Janssen y duna e fiscal indicacion cu Joran van der Sloot lo sa mucho mas di e caso di Natalee.
                 
              Oranjestad(AAN)  recently a investigative reporter from Holland let the rat out of the bag on the case of Natalee HOlloway on his hour long special television program.  Apparently He found out that Van der sloots lawyer spoke with Karin Jansen and said that Joran Vander sloot knows much more than he is telling about the Natalee Holloway case.


              E programa aki a causa furor na Hulanda, Antiyas, Merca y tambe na Aruba pasobra ningun hende tabata na altura di e supuesto conversacion cu e abogado di Van der Sloot lo tabata tin na un forma no formal cu e fiscal mayor, pa asina duna e fiscal indicacion cu Joran lo tabata sa mucho mas di loke e tabata declara na autoridadnan.

              The viewing of the program here has casued an uproar(furor) in Holland The Antilles America and also in aruba.  The furor itself over the fact that Vander sloots lawyer in an informal discusion with Jansen stated that Vandersloot knows more than what he has declared to the authoritys,

              Abogado di Van Der Sloot na Aruba, señor Carlo a nenga rotundamente cu e lo tabata tin un conversacion no oficial cu fiscal mayor Janssen y cu e a declara cu su cliente lo tabata sa mas di loke e tabata bisa polisnan.

              Senor Carlo the attorney for Vander sloot on Aruba vehemently denies that he has had any conversation with Janssen on declaring that his client knew more info than what he had declared to polis when interrogated.

              Awe e team investigativo di DIARIO ta publica algun parti di documentonan cu a worde haya den e investigacion riba desaparicion di Natalee Halloway y cada ken por lesa pa nan mes awe loke un funcionario policial hulandes a pone riba papel relaciona cu interogacion cu su persona a haci cu Joran van der Sloot.

              Diarios investigative team hs published some parts of the documentation that they have found in reference to the  disappearance in the Natalee Holloway case. This was done so that the pliticals in Holland could read about the interrogation and how Joran Vander sloot was questioned.

              ‘E sospechoso (aki ;Joran van der Sloot) a bisa, manera cu mi ( ‘Mi’ ta e funcionario policial hulandes) a tende, cu el (Joran van der Sloot) a puntra su mama pa tuma contacto telefonico cu e testigo Zedan Arambatzis, pa saca afor kico el a declara na polis’.

              The suspect Joran Vander sloot  had contacted and asked his mother to contact Zendan Arambatis so that Freddy could tell his mother what he declared to the polis when he (Zedan Arambatis was called in for questioning by the polis.

              ‘E sospechoso a conta cu su abogado Carlo, na un forma di den confianza, tambe a tende e storia di e testigo Zedan Arambatzis y cu e abogado a pidi Joran van der Sloot e dia siguiente na un forma ‘casi na yoramento’ pa e bay bisa e berdad’.

              The suspect JVDS contacted his attorney Carlo under quise of a confidential conversation  that he Carlo should also listen to Zedan Arambatis story of the testimony he gave.  It is said the next day that Carlo cried and begged JVDS to please tell the truth.

              ‘E sospechoso a conta cu abogado Carlo a informe (esta informa Joran van der Sloot) cu e testigo Zedan Arambatzis a declara encuanto Fishermanshut’. ‘Van der Sloot a declara cu a base di e informacion aki, el a dicidi di bisa e berdad, esta cu el a laga Natalee atras na Fishermanshut’.

              The suspect asked his attorney Carlo to listen to Zedan Arambatis declaration  and read especially about the testimony ZZedan Arambatis made regarding the fishermans hut.  According to Vander sloot he wanted to tell the truth about the fishermans hut especially being that he JVDS   ( not sure a laga means , i think (he alleges) alleges what he did with Natalee behind the fishermans hut.

              Analisando loke tin poni riba papel di documentonan di interogacion haci door di entre otro polisnan special di Hulanda cu a bin te Aruba pa yuda soluciona e caso di desaparicion di Natalee Halloway, cualkier investigador lo haci e siguiente preguntanan y tambe remarkenan; (1) Di con Joran van der Sloot a pidi su mama pa yama Zedan Arambatzis pa puntra e testigo aki kico el a declara na polis?

              analizing the documents of interrogation and having a special polis task force from Holland analize the documents for aruba could or should have brought forth a solution to the case of Natalee Holloway, any investigators would have known the proper questions to ask and remark upon #1 being why does JVDS want his mother to ask Zedan Arambatis to testify about something which he could easily have stated to polis himself?
              (2) Kico Zedan a declara na e mama di Joran van der Sloot?

              #2 What did Zedan say to JVDS mother about what JVDS told him?

              (3) E mama di Joran van der Sloot a worde interoga basa riba e
              informacionnan aki cu polis mes a pone riba papel?
              #3 Why is it that JVDS mother did not tell interrogators about the info Zedan gave her and why was it not written in a declartion to the investigators?
              (4) Riba ki dia Joran a pidi su mama pa bay averigua declaracion haci door di Zedan Arambatzis y ki dia e mama a yama e testigo aki y kico e testigo aki a declara na e mama di Joran y kende na su turno a informa su yiu di kico e testigo a declara?

              #4 in reference to what date did JVDS ask his mother to go and find out what Zedan Arambatis.s declared to the polis and why wasnt the testimony declared by JOran or his mother when time came to give thier own testimonys and declaration?

              (5) Di con e abogado ta bay puntra e sospechoso Joran, cual ta su cliente, na un forma ‘casi na yoramento’ pa e bisa e berdad?

              #5 Has anyone asked the lawyer for JVDS why he begged and cried for his client to tell the truth?

              (6) Na cua berdad ta worde referi aki?

              #6 if not true- from what refenrence did you derive this?

              (7) E supuesto berdad cu Joran mes ta bisa despues, cu el a laga Natalee atras na Fishermanshut?
              #7 Is it true  what JVDS alleges he did to Natalee behind the fishermans hut?
              (8) Si esey ta e berdad anto no tabata tin nada dje malo ey of dje impactante cu e abogado supuestamente lo mester a pidi Joran van der Sloot ‘casi na yoramento’ pa bisa e berdad?!

              #8 If not true why then is JVDS lawyer crying and begging for him to tell the truth? Imagine the impact it would have had on the case if the question had been asked.

              #9  Re Zedans testimony once Carlo his lawyer heard of it how come it was it under confidential info from client to lawyer since Joran was his client and not Zedan ? Why was this sensative info not made public to the people of Aruba.  Why was the Arubans who had no part or blame in this sad episode made to pay for the mistake of the perpetrators of this crime agaisnt Natalle Holloway A most controversial case in lack of justice for Aruba and the riening Hollanders have come to find out slowly but surely.  the truth will come to light one day.
              (9) Encuanto cu e abogado a tende e storia di e testigo Zedan na un forma di ‘den confianza’ ta habri caminda pa puntra; na unda el a tende e storia aki den confianza y for di ken y ken mas tabata sa di e supuesto storia aki y con bin un abogado a tende esaki ‘den confianza’ siendo cu Joran ta su cliente y cuanto informacion mas estilo ‘den confianza’ a keda scondi y cu te awe henter pueblo di Aruba ta paga e prijs miyonario pa loke pueblo no tin ni arte ni parti den dje ?
              Esakinan ta djis algun observacion den e caso mas controversial cu husticia na Aruba y Reino Hulandes a yega di conoce, pero cu poco poco e berdad ta saliendo na claridad di dia.

              Keda pendiente pa e dianan cu ta bin pasobra tin hopi y hopi mas pa sali y ta hopi pregunta mester bay haya contesta pasobra no por ta asina cu tin preto riba blanco poni, cu por lo menos dos persona a declara na polis kico a pasa cu Natalee unda cu Joran su nomber ta keda bin pa dilanti como e persona cu lo sa kico a pasa cu Natalee of a hunga un rol grandi den henter e caso, anto keto bay autoridadnan hudicial no por presenta un caso penal den corte.[/quote

              Everyone be-aware the day that more and I hope more info will be brought forth.  Lets hope that proper questions and awnsers will come forth.  Something about black ribon turning white  (I dont understand this) but at least two people have declared what happened to Natalee, like Joran who knows what has happened to Natalee and Joran who is playing this hugh role infornt of or for the benefit of the Holland authoritys so that his case will not go infront of the penal court.


              Thats the best I could do , please forgive any mistakes I dont speak papiamento.

              Merry CHRISTmas everyone   may Peace love and Joy fill your hearts this season.


              Sandy Leiva, thank you for this effor.  I'm way behind but wanted to let you know it is much appreciated.


              Title: Lively Case Discussion #553 12/3 - 12/4/2006
              Post by: Kat_Gram on December 04, 2006, 09:26:16 PM
              Quote from: "klaasend"
              (http://i37.photobucket.com/albums/e82/klaasend2/PURPLEPIMPS.gif)

              Soon. Hopefully.


              Title: Lively Case Discussion #553 12/3 - 12/4/2006
              Post by: LilPuma on December 04, 2006, 09:26:22 PM
              Quote from: "robots"

              GRETA... im talking to you.........cause i know you read here!!



               :lol:  :lol: A top notch news woman has to get her news somewhere!   :lol:  :lol:

              I was never a big fan of Greta, but I watched her show because of her coverage of this case and others of interest.  I have been tempted many times to ask Bill to give her some training in the area of interviewing guests.


              Title: Lively Case Discussion #553 12/3 - 12/4/2006
              Post by: robots on December 04, 2006, 09:27:37 PM
              Quote from: "LilPuma"
              Quote from: "robots"

              GRETA... im talking to you.........cause i know you read here!!



               :lol:  :lol: A top notch news woman has to get her news somewhere!   :lol:  :lol:

              I was never a big fan of Greta, but I watched her show because of her coverage of this case and others of interest.  I have been tempted many times to ask Bill to give her some training in the area of interviewing guests.


              GRETA needs to DEFINATELY put the CRACK PIPE away

              at least im inclined to think that :twisted:


              Title: Lively Case Discussion #553 12/3 - 12/4/2006
              Post by: LilPuma on December 04, 2006, 09:30:10 PM
              Quote from: "Carnut"

              I've sometimes wondered if the real reason that PVDS wouldn't let the ALE search the rest of the sloot premises was just that he didn't want any of the 'lower class' folks messing around on his property.


              I imagine Anita getting the vapors, fainting at the thought of someone looking at her underwear  :lol:  :lol:  :lol: and Paulus's friends saying "Now, now, we won't let them in."


              Title: Lively Case Discussion #553 12/3 - 12/4/2006
              Post by: LilPuma on December 04, 2006, 09:37:21 PM
              Quote from: "Kat_Gram"
              In this day and age, think Natalee would have used some other reference if she used it. Hitler is still discussed in Holland and hated for what they did to the country and citizens. Anita / Paulus would have heard stories from their parents.


              I don't know if Natalee said that; I've never been one to vehemently deny the likelihood.  I will say that if anyone said to me that someone they know is related to Hitler, I would take that to mean the person was strict, wanted their own way, wanted to be in control.  Nothing more.  I never understood what the big deal was, unless hit had a different meaning to Joran and others in Aruba.  Same with the "are they your slaves?" question.  If Joran is telling the Kalpoes what to do -- and from his interviews, they were at his side to do whatever he wanted -- I can see asking that.  However, since they are not caucasian, I'd think Natalee was intelligent enough to not say that.  Note to Nadira:  your sons, to me, aren't "black".  When I saw their pictures initially, I thought they looked hispanic.


              Title: Lively Case Discussion #553 12/3 - 12/4/2006
              Post by: Tylergal on December 04, 2006, 09:38:56 PM
              Quote from: "robots"
              Quote from: "klaasend"
              Quote from: "robots"
              klass, i was just trying to help

              you know, thought you might be napping  :wink:

              Nope, not napping  :lol:  I've had to do some work on my PC today though so I've been a little distracted.  Also, earlier today I had a dentist appointment and I was awol  :wink:



              whewwwwwwwwwwww


              glad youre ok

              i think joran will need a dentist soon  8)


              Perhaps that is why Dilbert went to NY toute suite to repair Anita's teeth, as I saw her sucking air through them on TV, perhaps a cavity, you think? Or does that cavity extend to her heart which is empty.


              Title: Lively Case Discussion #553 12/3 - 12/4/2006
              Post by: Carnut on December 04, 2006, 09:39:35 PM
              Quote from: "LilPuma"
              Quote from: "Kat_Gram"
              In this day and age, think Natalee would have used some other reference if she used it. Hitler is still discussed in Holland and hated for what they did to the country and citizens. Anita / Paulus would have heard stories from their parents.


              I don't know if Natalee said that; I've never been one to vehemently deny the likelihood.  I will say that if anyone said to me that someone they know is related to Hitler, I would take that to mean the person was strict, wanted their own way, wanted to be in control.  Nothing more.  I never understood what the big deal was, unless hit had a different meaning to Joran and others in Aruba.  Same with the "are they your slaves?" question.  If Joran is telling the Kalpoes what to do -- and from his interviews, they were at his side to do whatever he wanted -- I can see asking that.  However, since they are not caucasian, I'd think Natalee was intelligent enough to not say that.  Note to Nadira:  your sons, to me, aren't "black".  When I saw their pictures initially, I thought they looked hispanic.


              Yes, but in the world of the Dutch and Afrikaanrs they would be considered 'black'.


              Title: Lively Case Discussion #553 12/3 - 12/4/2006
              Post by: Tylergal on December 04, 2006, 09:41:48 PM
              Quote from: "LilPuma"
              Quote from: "robots"

              GRETA... im talking to you.........cause i know you read here!!



               :lol:  :lol: A top notch news woman has to get her news somewhere!   :lol:  :lol:

              I was never a big fan of Greta, but I watched her show because of her coverage of this case and others of interest.  I have been tempted many times to ask Bill to give her some training in the area of interviewing guests.


              Yes, I definitely think BOR and Geraldo could teach her a thing or two.


              Title: Lively Case Discussion #553 12/3 - 12/4/2006
              Post by: Carnut on December 04, 2006, 09:44:10 PM
              Quote from: "Tylergal"
              Quote from: "LilPuma"
              Quote from: "robots"

              GRETA... im talking to you.........cause i know you read here!!



               :lol:  :lol: A top notch news woman has to get her news somewhere!   :lol:  :lol:

              I was never a big fan of Greta, but I watched her show because of her coverage of this case and others of interest.  I have been tempted many times to ask Bill to give her some training in the area of interviewing guests.


              Yes, I definitely think BOR and Geraldo could teach her a thing or two.


              Well, I always thought she did a pretty good job interviewing folks on her show and keeping the topics on track, until her 'conversion'.


              Title: Lively Case Discussion #553 12/3 - 12/4/2006
              Post by: LilPuma on December 04, 2006, 09:45:09 PM
              Quote from: "Carnut"

              Yes, but in the world of the Dutch and Afrikaanrs they would be considered 'black'.


              Thanks, Carnut!  I really didn't know that.


              Title: Lively Case Discussion #553 12/3 - 12/4/2006
              Post by: Hotshot on December 04, 2006, 09:47:29 PM
              Quote from: "Kat_Gram"
              Don't you wish they would all go on a cruise ?
              In a submarine.
              With no air.

              I like your way of thinking....Hey thanks for the compliment today


              Title: Lively Case Discussion #553 12/3 - 12/4/2006
              Post by: Carnut on December 04, 2006, 09:49:00 PM
              Quote from: "LilPuma"
              Quote from: "Carnut"

              Yes, but in the world of the Dutch and Afrikaanrs they would be considered 'black'.


              Thanks, Carnut!  I really didn't know that.


              The story of Gandi was were he started out in S. Africa as a lawyer and was considered 'black' there.

              He finally made his way back to India and did his peaceful protesting.


              Title: Lively Case Discussion #553 12/3 - 12/4/2006
              Post by: Tylergal on December 04, 2006, 09:52:15 PM
              Quote from: "Carnut"
              Quote from: "LilPuma"
              Quote from: "Carnut"

              Yes, but in the world of the Dutch and Afrikaanrs they would be considered 'black'.


              Thanks, Carnut!  I really didn't know that.


              The story of Gandi was were he started out in S. Africa as a lawyer and was considered 'black' there.

              He finally made his way back to India and did his peaceful protesting.


              That is good history, Carnut, and I always believed where Martin Luther King took his cues.


              Title: Lively Case Discussion #553 12/3 - 12/4/2006
              Post by: LilPuma on December 04, 2006, 09:54:51 PM
              Speaking of Gandhi, I pulled up my journal and pulled out this quote:  


              When I despair, I remember that all through history the way of truth and love has always won. There have been tyrants, and murderers, and for a time they can seem invincible, but in the end they always fall, always.

              -Mahatma Gandhi


              Title: Lively Case Discussion #553 12/3 - 12/4/2006
              Post by: the big hammer on December 04, 2006, 10:34:07 PM
              Hitler, Aryan & Slaves

              ***************************

              Joran says that Natalee said her mother is a relative of Adolf Hitler

              Guido's attorney, Gerold Sprong, ties news coverage from USA to work of an "aryan race"

              Joran says Natalee asked if the Kalpoe's were slaves


              ***************************

              These are the sophmoric conventions of story-tellers and have no basis in fact.  

              The likelihood that an 18 yr old teenager from Alabama would refer to her mother as Hitler's daughter is as statistically likely as you being killed by a shark while swimming in an inalnd lake.  Nearly ZERO.

              Likewise, the "pc" culture pervading secular school life in the US these days would make it nearly impossible, except in passing joking reference for any American teenager to make serious comment re: 2 "dark skinned" boys (kalpoe) driving her around as "slaves".

              The Sprong comment, approved in advance by Wever Family, is another matter altogether.  This was a deliberate attempt at smearing the HT family and the attention garnered via American news media, targted to an audience who would hear the words "ARYAN RACE" and know whatthat means in conetxt of 1940's history.

              Looking back at the words spake by joran, it is clear it retrospect this was a similar attempt.

              Both sloot and wever/sprong were playing to a DIFFERENT AUDIENCE -- not you, not me -- but those in power in Aruba (Dutch) and those in the Netherlands who mattered.

              A truly disgraceful smear, and one our media elites shoudl have caught onto.  To this day, no one in the msm has even made mention of this strange cultural schism which animates much of this case.

              It is obvious, and it is there.

              .


              Title: Lively Case Discussion #553 12/3 - 12/4/2006
              Post by: Mere on December 04, 2006, 10:34:39 PM
              Urban legend or true:

              The winner of the BWB award was able to describe N's underwear correctly.


              Title: Lively Case Discussion #553 12/3 - 12/4/2006
              Post by: Tylergal on December 04, 2006, 10:35:29 PM
              Quote from: "Kat_Gram"
              Don't you wish they would all go on a cruise ?
              In a submarine.
              With no air.


              No, I want to see them all in shackles more than anyting I can think of.


              Title: Lively Case Discussion #553 12/3 - 12/4/2006
              Post by: Mere on December 04, 2006, 10:38:32 PM
              Hammer.....you are absolutely correct....and I come from that time in history....well, I was young..... :D


              Title: Lively Case Discussion #553 12/3 - 12/4/2006
              Post by: bleachedblack on December 04, 2006, 10:41:32 PM
              Wow evening Monkeys, seems we're into some heavy topics here tonight!  :)


              Title: Lively Case Discussion #553 12/3 - 12/4/2006
              Post by: bleachedblack on December 04, 2006, 10:51:37 PM
              Quote from: "LilPuma"
              Quote from: "Kat_Gram"
              In this day and age, think Natalee would have used some other reference if she used it. Hitler is still discussed in Holland and hated for what they did to the country and citizens. Anita / Paulus would have heard stories from their parents.


              I don't know if Natalee said that; I've never been one to vehemently deny the likelihood.  I will say that if anyone said to me that someone they know is related to Hitler, I would take that to mean the person was strict, wanted their own way, wanted to be in control.  Nothing more.  I never understood what the big deal was, unless hit had a different meaning to Joran and others in Aruba.  Same with the "are they your slaves?" question.  If Joran is telling the Kalpoes what to do -- and from his interviews, they were at his side to do whatever he wanted -- I can see asking that.  However, since they are not caucasian, I'd think Natalee was intelligent enough to not say that.  Note to Nadira:  your sons, to me, aren't "black".  When I saw their pictures initially, I thought they looked hispanic.


              My thoughts about Natalee and the possibility that she may have used/made a reference to Hitler in speaking about Beth is possible. While most of us don't think as often about such people as Hitler seniors in high schools who are often taught world history in the later grades ie juniors and seniors and have been testing (SAT's + ACT's) in the same grades may. I could very well envision my daughter calling me a Hitler . Infact awhile ago when she wanted to shave her hair off and I opposed, she called me a hair nazi . There you go......personal point of reference.


              Title: Lively Case Discussion #553 12/3 - 12/4/2006
              Post by: Mere on December 04, 2006, 10:59:04 PM
              Good night friends.... :)


              Title: Lively Case Discussion #553 12/3 - 12/4/2006
              Post by: robots on December 04, 2006, 11:01:36 PM
              hammer nailed it



              hhehehehehehehe


              THE HAMMER NAILED IT  8)  8)  8)  8)


              Title: Lively Case Discussion #553 12/3 - 12/4/2006
              Post by: igsigs on December 04, 2006, 11:01:42 PM
              Per MF...

              Dompig officially retired from the Polis force today.

              He will now be a rent-a-cop....errr...i mean a *security consultant*.


              Title: Lively Case Discussion #553 12/3 - 12/4/2006
              Post by: robots on December 04, 2006, 11:03:27 PM
              Quote from: "igsigs"
              Per MF...

              Dompig officially retired from the Polis force today.

              He will now be a rent-a-cop....errr...i mean a *security consultant*.



              is that anything like a mall cop


              Title: Lively Case Discussion #553 12/3 - 12/4/2006
              Post by: klaasend on December 04, 2006, 11:06:52 PM
              (http://i37.photobucket.com/albums/e82/klaasend2/blchblkxmas.gif)

              http://i37.photobucket.com/albums/e82/klaasend2/blchblkxmas.gif


              Title: Lively Case Discussion #553 12/3 - 12/4/2006
              Post by: igsigs on December 04, 2006, 11:07:41 PM
              Quote from: "robots"
              Quote from: "igsigs"
              Per MF...

              Dompig officially retired from the Polis force today.

              He will now be a rent-a-cop....errr...i mean a *security consultant*.



              is that anything like a mall cop

              I think so. Yet a *consultant* might have less responsibility than a mall cop. I think he will be chair-bound watching the Bacuti beach cam.


              Title: Lively Case Discussion #553 12/3 - 12/4/2006
              Post by: the big hammer on December 04, 2006, 11:09:38 PM
              Hitler, Aryan & Slaves - Part II

              The comments made during this case are different than declaring someone a "hair nazi" -- lexicon made popular during Seinfeld era on TV (soup nazi).

              Re-read the comments of wever attorney Sprong and his two references to "aryan race" -- this is dramatically different and something you'd never hear in a public statment by a US attorney -- it's unheard of.

              Taken as a whole ( the statements attributed to Natalee by jvds and the statements of the wever family attorney ) and in context, to me, it is clear what they are trying to say and to who they are saying it.

              They are attempting to alienate European/Dutch from feeling any empathy towards HT Family.  This is just one of the numerous smear jobs afoot in this case.

              .


              Title: Lively Case Discussion #553 12/3 - 12/4/2006
              Post by: klaasend on December 04, 2006, 11:09:46 PM
              Quote from: "igsigs"
              Per MF...

              Dompig officially retired from the Polis force today.

              He will now be a rent-a-cop....errr...i mean a *security consultant*.


              Thanks igsigs!  Here is MF's entire post on the subject:

              MF wrote:

              Well, it's official now: Dompig has finally retired from the ALE and was his last day. Today was also the sworn in ceremony of the new Chief of Police de Witte.

              Dompig will be having a new carreer as a security consultant for private companies and will also manage his security guard company.


              Title: Lively Case Discussion #553 12/3 - 12/4/2006
              Post by: bleachedblack on December 04, 2006, 11:10:28 PM
              Quote from: "klaasend"
              (http://i37.photobucket.com/albums/e82/klaasend2/blchblkxmas.gif)

              http://i37.photobucket.com/albums/e82/klaasend2/blchblkxmas.gif


              THANK-YOU THANK-YOU KLAAS I am positively festive! How did you do that without messing up my hair!  :wink:   :D


              Title: Lively Case Discussion #553 12/3 - 12/4/2006
              Post by: klaasend on December 04, 2006, 11:11:31 PM
              Bleachedblack - I was very careful not to get a hair out of place.  :wink:


              Title: Lively Case Discussion #553 12/3 - 12/4/2006
              Post by: bleachedblack on December 04, 2006, 11:13:18 PM
              I see....now I tried to upload it and lost Gilda....going for another try.....


              Title: Lively Case Discussion #553 12/3 - 12/4/2006
              Post by: klaasend on December 04, 2006, 11:14:42 PM
              Quote from: "bleachedblack"
              I see....now I tried to upload it and lost Gilda....going for another try.....


              Don't forget, only in the THIRD option in your profile and just copy and paste the link I gave you.


              Title: Lively Case Discussion #553 12/3 - 12/4/2006
              Post by: 2NJSons_Mom on December 04, 2006, 11:16:00 PM
              Quote from: "klaasend"
              Quote from: "igsigs"
              Per MF...

              Dompig officially retired from the Polis force today.

              He will now be a rent-a-cop....errr...i mean a *security consultant*.


              Thanks igsigs!  Here is MF's entire post on the subject:

              MF wrote:

              Well, it's official now: Dompig has finally retired from the ALE and was his last day. Today was also the sworn in ceremony of the new Chief of Police de Witte.

              Dompig will be having a new carreer as a security consultant for private companies and will also manage his security guard company.


              Oh, another Visibility Team...or maybe Invisiblity Team...boy, his credentials are out of this world.  He did such a good job securing the island as a LE officer he'll have no trouble sitting at a desk...eating, well...you know.  Yes, and the 'retired' is debatable, but I'm not giving JT credit for that thought.


              Title: Lively Case Discussion #553 12/3 - 12/4/2006
              Post by: justinsmama on December 04, 2006, 11:16:55 PM
              Quote from: "Carnut"
              Quote from: "MuffyBee"
              Quote from: "Ono"
              Well, I'd like to know whether or not there are any connections to Hitler in any of Anita's or Paulus' families ?


              That Hitler thing...It just SO rings like something someone of the Van der Sloot's ilk would come up with.  Yes, Hitler was a bad man alright.  It sounds like more of a European thing.  Not something Natalee would say.  I think that Hitler thing was just another big fat ole lie.  And the worst part of it was some of the follow up about it, like asking Beth if she was related to Hitler.  What a bunch of dolts!


              Stupid is as stupid does, mama used to say.


              Forrest? Is that you?  :wink:


              Title: Lively Case Discussion #553 12/3 - 12/4/2006
              Post by: Kat_Gram on December 04, 2006, 11:17:30 PM
              Quote from: "klaasend"
              Quote from: "igsigs"
              Per MF...

              Dompig officially retired from the Polis force today.

              He will now be a rent-a-cop....errr...i mean a *security consultant*.


              Thanks igsigs!  Here is MF's entire post on the subject:

              MF wrote:

              Well, it's official now: Dompig has finally retired from the ALE and was his last day. Today was also the sworn in ceremony of the new Chief of Police de Witte.
              If he works in a bank he could make sure all the chains on the pens are secure ! !

              Dompig will be having a new carreer as a security consultant for private companies and will also manage his security guard company.


              Title: Lively Case Discussion #553 12/3 - 12/4/2006
              Post by: bleachedblack on December 04, 2006, 11:19:05 PM
              Quote from: "klaasend"
              Quote from: "bleachedblack"
              I see....now I tried to upload it and lost Gilda....going for another try.....


              Don't forget, only in the THIRD option in your profile and just copy and paste the link I gave you.


              Woohoooooo I am B-E-A-U-T-I-F-U-L !   Merrrrrrrrry Christmas!


              Title: Lively Case Discussion #553 12/3 - 12/4/2006
              Post by: Kat_Gram on December 04, 2006, 11:19:11 PM
              If he works in a bank, he can make sure the chains on the pens are secure.


              Title: Lively Case Discussion #553 12/3 - 12/4/2006
              Post by: Kat_Gram on December 04, 2006, 11:20:16 PM
              Just maybe that will be his forte.


              Title: Lively Case Discussion #553 12/3 - 12/4/2006
              Post by: bleachedblack on December 04, 2006, 11:20:26 PM
              Quote from: "Kat_Gram"
              Quote from: "klaasend"
              Quote from: "igsigs"
              Per MF...

              Dompig officially retired from the Polis force today.

              He will now be a rent-a-cop....errr...i mean a *security consultant*.


              Thanks igsigs!  Here is MF's entire post on the subject:

              MF wrote:

              Well, it's official now: Dompig has finally retired from the ALE and was his last day. Today was also the sworn in ceremony of the new Chief of Police de Witte.
              If he works in a bank he could make sure all the chains on the pens are secure ! !

              Dompig will be having a new carreer as a security consultant for private companies and will also manage his security guard company.


              Dompigs resigning is either a sign that some $hit is gonna hit the fan, or he's in for a big promotion.


              Title: Lively Case Discussion #553 12/3 - 12/4/2006
              Post by: klaasend on December 04, 2006, 11:20:32 PM
              Quote from: "bleachedblack"
              Quote from: "klaasend"
              Quote from: "bleachedblack"
              I see....now I tried to upload it and lost Gilda....going for another try.....


              Don't forget, only in the THIRD option in your profile and just copy and paste the link I gave you.


              Woohoooooo I am B-E-A-U-T-I-F-U-L !   Merrrrrrrrry Christmas!

              Scared me for a minute.  I was affraid Tom made some changes that I didn't know about.  Louise is till having problems loading her xmas avatar and she can't reload her old one.


              Title: Lively Case Discussion #553 12/3 - 12/4/2006
              Post by: bleachedblack on December 04, 2006, 11:21:50 PM
              No I had a problem at first but it wasn't the site it was me.


              Title: Lively Case Discussion #553 12/3 - 12/4/2006
              Post by: Kat_Gram on December 04, 2006, 11:22:07 PM
              His " retirement " was in the works for a long time.
              Another one who was all talk. Got the hopes up. Then dashed them.


              Title: Lively Case Discussion #553 12/3 - 12/4/2006
              Post by: bleachedblack on December 04, 2006, 11:23:41 PM
              Quote from: "Kat_Gram"
              His " retirement " was in the works for a long time.
              Another one who was all talk. Got the hopes up. Then dashed them.


              Maybe he just wants to take-it-easy and hang out in the bushes with Boeti outside the HI.


              Title: Lively Case Discussion #553 12/3 - 12/4/2006
              Post by: Kat_Gram on December 04, 2006, 11:24:08 PM
              Does anyone remember the date when the judge was going to make a decision on the release of suspects ?


              Title: Lively Case Discussion #553 12/3 - 12/4/2006
              Post by: klaasend on December 04, 2006, 11:29:44 PM
              Quote from: "Kat_Gram"
              Does anyone remember the date when the judge was going to make a decision on the release of suspects ?

              Within 2 weeks of November 30th


              Title: Lively Case Discussion #553 12/3 - 12/4/2006
              Post by: bleachedblack on December 04, 2006, 11:31:19 PM
              When last I had heard anything it was a poster that had heard via Jossy, after the hearing that the earliest  we would hear would be this week, and then I later heard wednesday, but nothing for sure.


              Title: Lively Case Discussion #553 12/3 - 12/4/2006
              Post by: Kat_Gram on December 04, 2006, 11:41:01 PM
              I went to the FP and somethoing made me click on Carpe's name and I was whisked away like magic to this site.

              http://www.weaselballs.com/
              LOL Subtle, yet funny.  :lol:  :lol:  :lol:  :lol:


              Title: Lively Case Discussion #553 12/3 - 12/4/2006
              Post by: Kat_Gram on December 04, 2006, 11:42:35 PM
              Quote from: "klaasend"
              Quote from: "Kat_Gram"
              Does anyone remember the date when the judge was going to make a decision on the release of suspects ?

              Within 2 weeks of November 30th

              Ty


              Title: Lively Case Discussion #553 12/3 - 12/4/2006
              Post by: klaasend on December 04, 2006, 11:52:00 PM
              Quote from: "Kat_Gram"
              I went to the FP and somethoing made me click on Carpe's name and I was whisked away like magic to this site.

              http://www.weaselballs.com/
              LOL Subtle, yet funny.  :lol:  :lol:  :lol:  :lol:


              Carpe cracks me up  :lol:


              Title: Lively Case Discussion #553 12/3 - 12/4/2006
              Post by: bleachedblack on December 04, 2006, 11:58:13 PM
              I am so sure Freddy had a much larger part in Natalee's disappearance than we know. Since Freddie was arrested in August 2005 for allegedly taking photos/videos of underage girls and we have Satish Kalpoes statement about dropping a camera off at Freddy's , why has nothing more come foward about him?....and why did he get that GET-OUT-OF-JAIL -FREE_PASS?

              ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++

              Satish Kalpoe-06/24
              The second time was when Joran, my brother and I took the camera to Freddy’s house. We delivered the camera to Freddy, and afterwards all four of us ate Chinese in the area of Freddy’s house. Freddy also lives in Montanja. I do not remember his house number. We had bought food and we then we went to Joran’s apartment afterwards. According to me Freddy was informed then already about the missing girl. We may have spoken some about the missing girl, it is possible but I don’t remember.

              You ask me if I was scared when we were talking with Freddy about the missing girl. It is possible that I don’t remember. I say that we, Deepak and I, did not know that Freddy knew the real story. The real story, which was on the beach. It do not understand why Freddy was told that, according to me he knew both stories already.


              Title: Lively Case Discussion #553 12/3 - 12/4/2006
              Post by: robots on December 04, 2006, 11:59:58 PM
              Freddie knows what happened


              Title: Lively Case Discussion #553 12/3 - 12/4/2006
              Post by: bleachedblack on December 05, 2006, 12:00:39 AM
              Satish Kalpoe 06/13

              Joran´s father wanted to know everything but we did not tell him the truth. Accept Freddy, nobody knew we left Joran and the girl behind at the Marriot Beach.


              Title: Lively Case Discussion #553 12/3 - 12/4/2006
              Post by: bleachedblack on December 05, 2006, 12:01:47 AM
              Quote from: "robots"
              Freddie knows what happened


              Robots you don't look very festive.......is that because you are moving all around that you can dress up? Maybe alittle wreath around your neck?


              Title: Lively Case Discussion #553 12/3 - 12/4/2006
              Post by: robots on December 05, 2006, 12:04:04 AM
              Quote from: "bleachedblack"
              Quote from: "robots"
              Freddie knows what happened


              Robots you don't look very festive.......is that because you are moving all around that you can dress up? Maybe alittle wreath around your neck?



              LOL

              if someone can help me, i could put a wreath on  8)

              last week i was nekid and this week i need help getting dressed again


              Title: Lively Case Discussion #553 12/3 - 12/4/2006
              Post by: Kat_Gram on December 05, 2006, 12:05:26 AM
              If Natalee as left for good at the beach, she would have been found.
              Why do they insist over at the bad side of town any different ?
              Could Joran and Freddy have gone back for her ?


              Title: Lively Case Discussion #553 12/3 - 12/4/2006
              Post by: klaasend on December 05, 2006, 12:07:19 AM
              (http://i37.photobucket.com/albums/e82/klaasend2/robotsxmas.gif)

              http://i37.photobucket.com/albums/e82/klaasend2/robotsxmas.gif

              The white part turned yellow because there is no white in your robot  :wink:


              Title: Lively Case Discussion #553 12/3 - 12/4/2006
              Post by: robots on December 05, 2006, 12:07:31 AM
              Quote from: "Kat_Gram"
              If Natalee as left for good at the beach, she would have been found.
              Why do they insist over at the bad side of town any different ?
              Could Joran and Freddy have gone back for her ?


              beach story is a LOAD, i think

              Joran Drove GUIDO's Car after he was left walking towards the beach


              Title: Lively Case Discussion #553 12/3 - 12/4/2006
              Post by: Tylergal on December 05, 2006, 12:07:47 AM
              Quote from: "bleachedblack"
              Quote from: "LilPuma"
              Quote from: "Kat_Gram"
              In this day and age, think Natalee would have used some other reference if she used it. Hitler is still discussed in Holland and hated for what they did to the country and citizens. Anita / Paulus would have heard stories from their parents.


              I don't know if Natalee said that; I've never been one to vehemently deny the likelihood.  I will say that if anyone said to me that someone they know is related to Hitler, I would take that to mean the person was strict, wanted their own way, wanted to be in control.  Nothing more.  I never understood what the big deal was, unless hit had a different meaning to Joran and others in Aruba.  Same with the "are they your slaves?" question.  If Joran is telling the Kalpoes what to do -- and from his interviews, they were at his side to do whatever he wanted -- I can see asking that.  However, since they are not caucasian, I'd think Natalee was intelligent enough to not say that.  Note to Nadira:  your sons, to me, aren't "black".  When I saw their pictures initially, I thought they looked hispanic.


              My thoughts about Natalee and the possibility that she may have used/made a reference to Hitler in speaking about Beth is possible. While most of us don't think as often about such people as Hitler seniors in high schools who are often taught world history in the later grades ie juniors and seniors and have been testing (SAT's + ACT's) in the same grades may. I could very well envision my daughter calling me a Hitler . Infact awhile ago when she wanted to shave her hair off and I opposed, she called me a hair nazi . There you go......personal point of reference.


              That would never have crossed a Southern girl's mind to say that.  She might say she had the "Mother from Haedes," but she would not alude to Hitler, especially since a couple of girls in her circle are Jewish.  She would probably not even say that unless Joran said, "My dad is like Hitler," and I cannot even imagine her saying her mom was like Hitler's sister, but she probably would have said, "In what way?"  That is the way girls respond with boys.  There is too little information about any conversation they had except where Joran says she made the Hiter reference, the slave reference and wanting to see sharks.  He's a liar. Natalee probably begged for her life but he could not tell that.  IF he told the truth about how she begged to be free of them or not to kill her, then his little goose thingy would be cooked.


              Title: Lively Case Discussion #553 12/3 - 12/4/2006
              Post by: robots on December 05, 2006, 12:08:16 AM
              Quote from: "klaasend"
              (http://i37.photobucket.com/albums/e82/klaasend2/robotsxmas.gif)

              http://i37.photobucket.com/albums/e82/klaasend2/robotsxmas.gif

              The white part turned yellow because there is no white in your robot  :wink:


              thats ok

              my favorite color is yellow  8)


              Title: Lively Case Discussion #553 12/3 - 12/4/2006
              Post by: bleachedblack on December 05, 2006, 12:09:19 AM
              Quote from: "klaasend"
              Quote from: "Tylergal"
              Totally OT, but where is Mrs. Red and what about Jacquie?  I need to know something about a movie poster.  I want a movie poster that is made of wood or that I can put onto wood that says, "it's a wonderful life" to place on my black wicker swing on my porch and put lights, garlands and red bows around it.  Need movie buff help.


              You can get a poster from www.allposters.com but you will probably have to mount it on wood yourself.  They have several to choose from, this is my favorite:


              (http://imagecache2.allposters.com/images/34/003_ITSAWONDSA.jpg)


              Saw your post and when I saw this sign on Ebay thought I link it over and ask if it is anything you might be looking for? not a movie poster size though?

              http://tinyurl.com/y6plob


              Title: Lively Case Discussion #553 12/3 - 12/4/2006
              Post by: Kat_Gram on December 05, 2006, 12:10:58 AM
              I don't think there was much of a conversation.
              I really do believe that the assault started as soon as they got away from any traffic into a deserted area on the road.


              Title: Lively Case Discussion #553 12/3 - 12/4/2006
              Post by: bleachedblack on December 05, 2006, 12:12:00 AM
              Quote from: "robots"
              Quote from: "klaasend"
              (http://i37.photobucket.com/albums/e82/klaasend2/robotsxmas.gif)

              http://i37.photobucket.com/albums/e82/klaasend2/robotsxmas.gif

              The white part turned yellow because there is no white in your robot  :wink:


              thats ok

              my favorite color is yellow  8)


              You look JOLLY!


              Title: Lively Case Discussion #553 12/3 - 12/4/2006
              Post by: Kat_Gram on December 05, 2006, 12:12:39 AM
              Deepak turned the radio way up so he didn't have to listen


              Title: Lively Case Discussion #553 12/3 - 12/4/2006
              Post by: robots on December 05, 2006, 12:13:13 AM
              joran knew Natalee was dead

              they had to come up with RUN AWAY story from the get go as a possibility

              thus, the HITLER remark

              the DRUG BULLCRAP

              etc
              etc
              etc
              etc


              it is quite boring and these people, IF YOU CAN CALL THEM PEOPLE
              are really quite simple minded  when they come up with these crazy ideas

              most 8 year olds think at their level of ingenuity  8)


              Title: Lively Case Discussion #553 12/3 - 12/4/2006
              Post by: Tylergal on December 05, 2006, 12:13:13 AM
              Quote from: "igsigs"
              Per MF...

              Dompig officially retired from the Polis force today.

              He will now be a rent-a-cop....errr...i mean a *security consultant*.


              Ah, no Dr. Dompig, huh.  So sad.


              Title: Lively Case Discussion #553 12/3 - 12/4/2006
              Post by: robots on December 05, 2006, 12:13:59 AM
              Quote from: "bleachedblack"
              Quote from: "robots"
              Quote from: "klaasend"
              (http://i37.photobucket.com/albums/e82/klaasend2/robotsxmas.gif)

              http://i37.photobucket.com/albums/e82/klaasend2/robotsxmas.gif

              The white part turned yellow because there is no white in your robot  :wink:


              thats ok

              my favorite color is yellow  8)


              You look JOLLY!


              thanks,

               im SANTA ROBOTS  :P


              Title: Lively Case Discussion #553 12/3 - 12/4/2006
              Post by: Tylergal on December 05, 2006, 12:14:40 AM
              Quote from: "the big hammer"
              Hitler, Aryan & Slaves - Part II

              The comments made during this case are different than declaring someone a "hair nazi" -- lexicon made popular during Seinfeld era on TV (soup nazi).

              Re-read the comments of wever attorney Sprong and his two references to "aryan race" -- this is dramatically different and something you'd never hear in a public statment by a US attorney -- it's unheard of.

              Taken as a whole ( the statements attributed to Natalee by jvds and the statements of the wever family attorney ) and in context, to me, it is clear what they are trying to say and to who they are saying it.

              They are attempting to alienate European/Dutch from feeling any empathy towards HT Family.  This is just one of the numerous smear jobs afoot in this case.

              .


              Exactly.  I have said that before, but you said it so much more succintly and eloquently.


              Title: Lively Case Discussion #553 12/3 - 12/4/2006
              Post by: bleachedblack on December 05, 2006, 12:14:42 AM
              ....and your hat matches your eyes...just lovely.


              Title: Lively Case Discussion #553 12/3 - 12/4/2006
              Post by: Kat_Gram on December 05, 2006, 12:15:23 AM
              What will he do with the Play Doctor set he bought now ?
              Well, I guess he could use the nice red case it comes it for a lunch bucket !


              Title: Lively Case Discussion #553 12/3 - 12/4/2006
              Post by: Tylergal on December 05, 2006, 12:16:17 AM
              Quote from: "2NJSons_Mom"
              Quote from: "klaasend"
              Quote from: "igsigs"
              Per MF...

              Dompig officially retired from the Polis force today.

              He will now be a rent-a-cop....errr...i mean a *security consultant*.


              Thanks igsigs!  Here is MF's entire post on the subject:

              MF wrote:

              Well, it's official now: Dompig has finally retired from the ALE and was his last day. Today was also the sworn in ceremony of the new Chief of Police de Witte.

              Dompig will be having a new carreer as a security consultant for private companies and will also manage his security guard company.


              Oh, another Visibility Team...or maybe Invisiblity Team...boy, his credentials are out of this world.  He did such a good job securing the island as a LE officer he'll have no trouble sitting at a desk...eating, well...you know.  Yes, and the 'retired' is debatable, but I'm not giving JT credit for that thought.


              But you see, in this way, he can have a  BMW or Mercedes for each member of the family, entrepneur that he is.


              Title: Lively Case Discussion #553 12/3 - 12/4/2006
              Post by: robots on December 05, 2006, 12:16:56 AM
              well, which way was it JORAN??????????
              HUH ?????????
               

              see, he said they ALL had sex with her.

              well, according to JORAN there were MANY people on the beach

              so, they were not having sex on the beach now were they ??????

              BAGGED the LIAR in another IMPOSSIBILITY

              so, where was it happening ????



              Out in the middle of NOWHERE,,,,or at the HOUSE


              Title: Lively Case Discussion #553 12/3 - 12/4/2006
              Post by: klaasend on December 05, 2006, 12:17:29 AM
              I need to jump in the shower so don't be in a rush to get to page 50 please.


              Title: Lively Case Discussion #553 12/3 - 12/4/2006
              Post by: Kat_Gram on December 05, 2006, 12:17:49 AM
              It's been fairly transparent to us what level of cover up and lies have been going on and the zero motivation in wanting ot prosecute this case and now with DeVries, maybe there will be some justice.


              Title: Lively Case Discussion #553 12/3 - 12/4/2006
              Post by: klaasend on December 05, 2006, 12:19:52 AM
              Actually, I'm going to lock the thread a little early..get ready!


              (http://i37.photobucket.com/albums/e82/klaasend2/nowlocked.jpg)

              Please move to LCD #554

              http://www.scaredmonkeys.net/viewtopic.php?t=611