Scared Monkeys Discussion Forum

Natalee Holloway => LCD Archive => Topic started by: klaasend on December 16, 2006, 10:11:18 AM



Title: Lively Case Discussion #561 12/16 - 12/18/2006
Post by: klaasend on December 16, 2006, 10:11:18 AM
You all know the rules!

(http://i37.photobucket.com/albums/e82/klaasend2/smtreeFinal2holiday3.jpg)


Title: Lively Case Discussion #561 12/16 - 12/18/2006
Post by: klaasend on December 16, 2006, 02:48:37 PM
Brought over from the previous thread:

From Crazybabyborg:

Hey Monkeys!

Since I don't know your addresses, and communicate through the cage, I wanted to send you a Christmas Card. Lots of Love and wishes for a very Merry Christmas!

http://www.asilentnightmovie.com/


Title: Lively Case Discussion #561 12/16 - 12/18/2006
Post by: klaasend on December 16, 2006, 02:56:22 PM
In about an hour, I'm leaving for our extended family Christmas get together.  I'll be gone about 6 hours or so.  Tom will be in charge, so take it easy on him, ok  :lol:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #561 12/16 - 12/18/2006
Post by: Katysmom on December 16, 2006, 02:57:35 PM
When Kock said that an offer had been made, but the Kalpoes turned it down, I wonder if it actually wasn't the other way around.  Perhaps the Kalpoe's told Dr. Phil's people that they would settle for xxx amount of dollars in exchange for not fileing a suit and Dr. Phil told them where to go.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #561 12/16 - 12/18/2006
Post by: klaasend on December 16, 2006, 02:58:20 PM
Quote from: "Katysmom"
When Kock said that an offer had been made, but the Kalpoes turned it down, I wonder if it actually wasn't the other way around.  Perhaps the Kalpoe's told Dr. Phil's people that they would settle for xxx amount of dollars in exchange for not fileing a suit and Dr. Phil told them where to go.

Very possible.  Remember, the only information we have on this is coming from MF at FOB.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #561 12/16 - 12/18/2006
Post by: crazybabyborg on December 16, 2006, 02:58:43 PM
Oh Klaas.........THANK YOU for posting the Dr. Phil response to the suit! Thank You, Thank You, Thank You!!!!

OK, we all need to write and encourage them in their stance!

I admit, I was horrified at the thought that there might be a settlement. The thought of Natalee's killers getting rich off this made me ill...........

Oh, God Bless 'em for taking a strong stand!!!!!!


Title: Lively Case Discussion #561 12/16 - 12/18/2006
Post by: San on December 16, 2006, 02:59:29 PM
Quote from: "klaasend"
In about an hour, I'm leaving for our extended family Christmas get together.  I'll be gone about 6 hours or so.  Tom will be in charge, so take it easy on him, ok  :lol:

Have a good time Klaas.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #561 12/16 - 12/18/2006
Post by: klaasend on December 16, 2006, 03:00:59 PM
Quote from: "San"
Quote from: "klaasend"
In about an hour, I'm leaving for our extended family Christmas get together.  I'll be gone about 6 hours or so.  Tom will be in charge, so take it easy on him, ok  :lol:

Have a good time Klaas.


Honestly, I'll want to come home after about 3 hours but that's not likely to happen, lol  :lol:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #561 12/16 - 12/18/2006
Post by: crazybabyborg on December 16, 2006, 03:01:15 PM
That post made my day. They're going to fight it. No settlement.

Now, that's a Christmas gift come early!  :wink:

Whew..........OK, off to do something Christmasy!

Have a glorious time Klaas!


Title: Lively Case Discussion #561 12/16 - 12/18/2006
Post by: Kat_Gram on December 16, 2006, 03:02:25 PM
Quote from: "klaasend"
In about an hour, I'm leaving for our extended family Christmas get together.  I'll be gone about 6 hours or so.  Tom will be in charge, so take it easy on him, ok  :lol:

I promise to be very good. That might require silence. You have a great time Klaasend.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #561 12/16 - 12/18/2006
Post by: mishy on December 16, 2006, 03:04:28 PM
This from the Paramount statement in the last thread is very interesting, IMHO:

In a parting shot in its statement, Paramount says, "We also intend to discover who or what has motivated this lawsuit from the Kalpoe brothers, two of the primary suspects in Natalee’s disappearance and two of the last people seen driving away with her in their car."


Title: Lively Case Discussion #561 12/16 - 12/18/2006
Post by: Sleuth on December 16, 2006, 03:07:56 PM
Quote from: "klaasend"
In about an hour, I'm leaving for our extended family Christmas get together.  I'll be gone about 6 hours or so.  Tom will be in charge, so take it easy on him, ok  :lol:


Have a great time Klaas.  Does extended mean the family members that will be there, or is extended in relation to the 6 hours or so you'd be away from the forum  :wink:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #561 12/16 - 12/18/2006
Post by: carpe noctem on December 16, 2006, 03:09:21 PM
Quote from: "klaasend"
Quote from: "San"
Quote from: "klaasend"
In about an hour, I'm leaving for our extended family Christmas get together.  I'll be gone about 6 hours or so.  Tom will be in charge, so take it easy on him, ok  :lol:

Have a good time Klaas.


Honestly, I'll want to come home after about 3 hours but that's not likely to happen, lol  :lol:



hey klaas do u think perhaps it may be part of bigger

things at work here... maybe dr. phil's team made the

offer laughable on purpose... to chap their a$$es

and get em here on the mainland?

where we will

roll their asses out flatter

than fritters. IN SHORT,

I am smelling RAT TRAP

(http://www.animation-station.com/smileys/images/american_flag_smileys.gif)


THOUGHTS?


Title: Lively Case Discussion #561 12/16 - 12/18/2006
Post by: San on December 16, 2006, 03:09:55 PM
Quote from: "klaasend"
Quote from: "San"
Quote from: "klaasend"
In about an hour, I'm leaving for our extended family Christmas get together.  I'll be gone about 6 hours or so.  Tom will be in charge, so take it easy on him, ok  :lol:

Have a good time Klaas.


Honestly, I'll want to come home after about 3 hours but that's not likely to happen, lol  :lol:

Last time I went to a family get together with the crazy side of my family a big fight broke out.  I was like :shock: .  Then I took a look and guess whose older sister got challenged to a fight :lol: .  I had to grab her with another person to get her out of there because she went after the woman (she never backs down).  I said we better go home before we get killed.  It's been two years and I've never been to another family function and don't plan on attending again :lol: .  I was like a scene out of a movie you would not believe it.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #561 12/16 - 12/18/2006
Post by: Sleuth on December 16, 2006, 03:10:28 PM
Quote from: "mishy"
This from the Paramount statement in the last thread is very interesting, IMHO:

In a parting shot in its statement, Paramount says, "We also intend to discover who or what has motivated this lawsuit from the Kalpoe brothers, two of the primary suspects in Natalee’s disappearance and two of the last people seen driving away with her in their car."


Yes, this will be very interesting.  Both the who and the what aspects.  At first blush you would think it is $ motivating it, but I don't think so.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #561 12/16 - 12/18/2006
Post by: klaasend on December 16, 2006, 03:11:50 PM
Quote from: "Sleuth"
Quote from: "klaasend"
In about an hour, I'm leaving for our extended family Christmas get together.  I'll be gone about 6 hours or so.  Tom will be in charge, so take it easy on him, ok  :lol:


Have a great time Klaas.  Does extended mean the family members that will be there, or is extended in relation to the 6 hours or so you'd be away from the forum  :wink:


ROFLMAO - both!  :lol:

Extended family.  Aunts, uncles, cousins and their kids, etc.  They moved it to the week before Christmas to make it easier on everyone Christmas day.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #561 12/16 - 12/18/2006
Post by: Sleuth on December 16, 2006, 03:12:20 PM
Carpe, I agree.

Bye for now monkeys.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #561 12/16 - 12/18/2006
Post by: klaasend on December 16, 2006, 03:13:16 PM
San - too funny!  :lol:

Carpe - I wouldn't be surprised at all.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #561 12/16 - 12/18/2006
Post by: Kat_Gram on December 16, 2006, 03:13:26 PM
Quote from: "klaasend"
Quote from: "Katysmom"
When Kock said that an offer had been made, but the Kalpoes turned it down, I wonder if it actually wasn't the other way around.  Perhaps the Kalpoe's told Dr. Phil's people that they would settle for xxx amount of dollars in exchange for not fileing a suit and Dr. Phil told them where to go.

Very possible.  Remember, the only information we have on this is coming from MF at FOB.

I never considered that one.
I haven't read the transcript of the tape for quite a few months, but if you ignore the debate of Yes, No, etc and read the rest of it, there are several clues as to what motivates Deepak and just what kind of a weasel he is. It's all about him and how he has suffered. His sports jacket, New $ 200.00 ( depreciated value  $  5.00 ) is a greater concern to him that the fact that people are hurting because of Natalee's
disappearance. He has lied his way into this mess and created it himself and now he wants to be paid off because HE is suffering. It's time for the Kalpoes to have a Come To Shiva moment.
He has stuck his own head into the noose quite willingly by his own actions.  
And I am glad that the cash he seeks is not going to be just given to him. They are going to have to work for it and more will be revealed in the process.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #561 12/16 - 12/18/2006
Post by: carpe noctem on December 16, 2006, 03:14:01 PM
Quote from: "Sleuth"
Carpe, I agree.

Bye for now monkeys.



tnaks, Sleuth!


c-ya 'round...


Title: Lively Case Discussion #561 12/16 - 12/18/2006
Post by: Sleuth on December 16, 2006, 03:14:44 PM
Quote from: "Katysmom"
When Kock said that an offer had been made, but the Kalpoes turned it down, I wonder if it actually wasn't the other way around.  Perhaps the Kalpoe's told Dr. Phil's people that they would settle for xxx amount of dollars in exchange for not fileing a suit and Dr. Phil told them where to go.


Katysmom - I would believe this before I'd believe Dr. Phil offered a genuine settlement.  I would believe Dr. Phil offered a settlement that would entice them to visit the US, though.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #561 12/16 - 12/18/2006
Post by: Kat_Gram on December 16, 2006, 03:17:55 PM
Whoever has the deepest pockets usually wins.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #561 12/16 - 12/18/2006
Post by: Kat_Gram on December 16, 2006, 03:24:10 PM
Quote from: "mishy"
This from the Paramount statement in the last thread is very interesting, IMHO:

In a parting shot in its statement, Paramount says, "We also intend to discover who or what has motivated this lawsuit from the Kalpoe brothers, two of the primary suspects in Natalee’s disappearance and two of the last people seen driving away with her in their car."

Mishy could you re find that and bring all it here ? I missed it and want to read it and savor it.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #561 12/16 - 12/18/2006
Post by: carpe noctem on December 16, 2006, 03:24:33 PM
Quote from: "Kat_Gram"
Whoever has the deepest pockets usually wins.


PRECISELY!

The Kalpoes lawyers may think the water is pretty cold.

..but JQK, knows that is DEEP, AS WELL!!!


(http://www.animation-station.com/smileys/images/smiley_abxe.gif)


Title: Lively Case Discussion #561 12/16 - 12/18/2006
Post by: carpe noctem on December 16, 2006, 03:25:34 PM
GO JQK!  :)


Title: Lively Case Discussion #561 12/16 - 12/18/2006
Post by: Kat_Gram on December 16, 2006, 03:27:17 PM
From Dr. Phil's website :



From Dr. Phil’s Website: All new monday…. New developments in the Natalee Holloway case. Beth and I are back together again in the continued quest for justice for her daughter Natalee Holloway.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #561 12/16 - 12/18/2006
Post by: LilPuma on December 16, 2006, 03:27:53 PM
Quote from: "Sleuth"
Quote from: "Katysmom"
When Kock said that an offer had been made, but the Kalpoes turned it down, I wonder if it actually wasn't the other way around.  Perhaps the Kalpoe's told Dr. Phil's people that they would settle for xxx amount of dollars in exchange for not fileing a suit and Dr. Phil told them where to go.


Katysmom - I would believe this before I'd believe Dr. Phil offered a genuine settlement.  I would believe Dr. Phil offered a settlement that would entice them to visit the US, though.


Negotiations of this kind can be used to find out (1) what the other party wants and (2) what they've got - how strong do they feel their case is.  It's like a district attorney offering a plea bargain.  If the DA has a strong case, they're less likely to offer a plea deal.  

Also, I'd bet that Deepak thinks that even if he loses, he'll be in the news and make a name for himself.  Magazines, talk shows, publishers will pay him for interviews and appearances.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #561 12/16 - 12/18/2006
Post by: klaasend on December 16, 2006, 03:29:04 PM
Just posted by MF at FOB.  This is the kind of BS you would expect from them.

Remember when Uncle Jossy said this on TV las night?:

Jossy: "Well they did confess it, we had the tape analyzed by some experts in Venezuela, it's a legitimate tape and they did admit to having sex but not only on the tape, they admitted to having sex with the girl when she was going in and out of consciousness in the car".

Well, the problem is, the Kalpoe Lawyers have the scientific evidence that the tape was manipulated and edited to show that they said "she did" instead of "no, she didn't" and "how simple it was" instead of "how simple it was that night" from the N.F.I. AND AN AMERICAN LAB IN CALIFORNIA.

The results were definite: the tapes were edited, not only for time lapse on the Drd. Phil show, but to change what the Kalpoe kid said!
___________

I think the Kalpoes and the posters at RU and FOB are in for a big surprise when it comes to the tape  :wink:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #561 12/16 - 12/18/2006
Post by: Kat_Gram on December 16, 2006, 03:33:17 PM
http://www.amigoe.com/english/

It's in this paper, but number three down is also very interesting.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #561 12/16 - 12/18/2006
Post by: klaasend on December 16, 2006, 03:35:52 PM
PARAMOUNT Studios Speaks

http://www.eonline.com/news/article/index.jsp?uuid=842d5b63-98c9-4603-8e5e-b8c93c596c2d&page=2

He usually focuses on relationship problems, but even Dr. Phil couldn't resist joining the media circus surrounding the Natalie Holloway case. And now it may cost him.

Deepak and Satish Kalpoe, teenage brothers who were once considered prime suspects in the 18-year-old's May 30, 2005, disappearance while vacationing in Aruba, is suing the Dr. Phil show, claiming they were defamed on national TV.

The lawsuit, filed Wednesday in Los Angeles Superior Court, accuses McGraw, along with private investigator Jamie Skeeters and the CBS Television Group, of committing libel and slander, invasion of privacy, emotional distress, fraud, deceit and civil conspiracy by editing and airing an interview between Skeeters and Deepak Kalpoe to suggest the brothers somehow committed a crime.

The show's producer, Paramount Studios, slammed the lawsuit. "We stand by the integrity of the Dr. Phil show, our editing process and the accuracy of the program that we aired. We will vigorously defend against these baseless claims."

The episode in question aired Sept. 15, 2005, on the nationally syndicated show, days after the brothers were released from custody by Aruban police. Holloway was last seen getting in a car with the siblings and Dutch teen Joran Van Der Sloot, but authorities said they lacked sufficient evidence to hold the teens, in part because investigators could not determine whether Holloway was dead or alive since her body had yet to be found.

The complaint states that Skeeter secretly videotaped an interview with Deepak Kalpoe and then aired the illicit recording on Dr. Phil—after cutting it in such a way as to "create false, incriminating and defamatory statements that the plaintiffs engaged in criminal activity against Natalee Holloway."

Per court documents, McGraw & Co. specifically implied that the siblings slipped Holloway a date-rape drug, forced her to have nonconsensual sex and then supposedly aided in killing her and hiding the body, allegations which the Kalpoes and Van Der Sloot have denied.

But Paramount disputes the charge. "Deepak Kalpoe’s statements, which aired on the Dr. Phil show, were his own words presented in a manner that the show believed accurately reflected the sum and substance of what he said in a recorded interview with Jamie Skeeters in Aruba."

The suit claims Deepak Kalpoe agreed to the sit-down with the P.I. in the assumption that Skeeter might help clear him and his brother. Skeeter allegedly told Kalpoe that the gruff McGraw was a "god" who could "influence a country" and help their case.

After months of searching for the missing young woman, Aruban investigators shifted their probe away from the brothers and Van Der Sloot to pursue other leads. The case remains unsolved.

A lawyer for the Kalpoes could not be reached for comment Friday. Their suit seeks unspecified general, special and punitive damages.

In a parting shot in its statement, Paramount says, "We also intend to discover who or what has motivated this lawsuit from the Kalpoe brothers, two of the primary suspects in Natalee’s disappearance and two of the last people seen driving away with her in their car."

Shortly after the Kalpoes took legal action against Dr. Phil, Holloway's parents fired back.

Beth Twitty and Dave Holloway filed a civil wrongful-death suit against the teens Thursday in Los Angeles Superior Court, accusing them of causing their daughter's death by "intentionally, negligently, wantonly...unlawfully conducting themselves" in a way that brought about fatal injuries.

"All we want is justice for our daughter. There is no doubt in my mind that Deepak and Satish played a role in my daughter's death and should be held accountable," Beth Twitty said. "It is unconscionable that they have not been punished so far."


Title: Lively Case Discussion #561 12/16 - 12/18/2006
Post by: Kat_Gram on December 16, 2006, 03:35:55 PM
Quote from: "klaasend"
Just posted by MF at FOB.  This is the kind of BS you would expect from them.

Remember when Uncle Jossy said this on TV las night?:

Jossy: "Well they did confess it, we had the tape analyzed by some experts in Venezuela, it's a legitimate tape and they did admit to having sex but not only on the tape, they admitted to having sex with the girl when she was going in and out of consciousness in the car".

Well, the problem is, the Kalpoe Lawyers have the scientific evidence that the tape was manipulated and edited to show that they said "she did" instead of "no, she didn't" and "how simple it was" instead of "how simple it was that night" from the N.F.I. AND AN AMERICAN LAB IN CALIFORNIA.

The results were definite: the tapes were edited, not only for time lapse on the Drd. Phil show, but to change what the Kalpoe kid said!
___________

I think the Kalpoes and the posters at RU and FOB are in for a big surprise when it comes to the tape  :wink:

Well, who is to say what tape the Kaploes had ?


Title: Lively Case Discussion #561 12/16 - 12/18/2006
Post by: robots on December 16, 2006, 03:38:22 PM
Quote from: "klaasend"
Just posted by MF at FOB.  This is the kind of BS you would expect from them.

Remember when Uncle Jossy said this on TV las night?:

Jossy: "Well they did confess it, we had the tape analyzed by some experts in Venezuela, it's a legitimate tape and they did admit to having sex but not only on the tape, they admitted to having sex with the girl when she was going in and out of consciousness in the car".

Well, the problem is, the Kalpoe Lawyers have the scientific evidence that the tape was manipulated and edited to show that they said "she did" instead of "no, she didn't" and "how simple it was" instead of "how simple it was that night" from the N.F.I. AND AN AMERICAN LAB IN CALIFORNIA.

The results were definite: the tapes were edited, not only for time lapse on the Drd. Phil show, but to change what the Kalpoe kid said!
___________

I think the Kalpoes and the posters at RU and FOB are in for a big surprise when it comes to the tape  :wink:


who is STUPIDER ??   <------------------LOL

the k2 brothers or the idiotic lawyers  :twisted:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #561 12/16 - 12/18/2006
Post by: Kat_Gram on December 16, 2006, 03:41:14 PM
Correct me if I am wrong, but as to what was a genuine copy of what was on Skeeters hard drive already certified as being unaltered ?
If there is a question as to what was said and what wasn't said, it's Skeeters vs Deepak.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #561 12/16 - 12/18/2006
Post by: klaasend on December 16, 2006, 03:42:36 PM
Quote from: "Kat_Gram"
Correct me if I am wrong, but as to what was a genuine copy of what was on Skeeters hard drive already certified as being unaltered ?
If there is a question as to what was said and what wasn't said, it's Skeeters vs Deepak.


According to Skeeters and many others "in the know", there is NO DOUBT Deepak said DID.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #561 12/16 - 12/18/2006
Post by: klaasend on December 16, 2006, 03:43:26 PM
OK - got to leave now.  See you all later!


Title: Lively Case Discussion #561 12/16 - 12/18/2006
Post by: AZLady on December 16, 2006, 03:45:37 PM
Kat, it is possible that the only tape the Kalpoes and their attorneys have is the one that the Arubans tampered with and modified to reflect their own interpretation.  It might not be identical to the original tape the FBI holds.  If this is the case, Deepak and Satish have lied to their attorneys.  That won't be pretty.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #561 12/16 - 12/18/2006
Post by: San on December 16, 2006, 03:47:01 PM
Quote from: "klaasend"
Just posted by MF at FOB.  This is the kind of BS you would expect from them.

Remember when Uncle Jossy said this on TV las night?:

Jossy: "Well they did confess it, we had the tape analyzed by some experts in Venezuela, it's a legitimate tape and they did admit to having sex but not only on the tape, they admitted to having sex with the girl when she was going in and out of consciousness in the car".

Well, the problem is, the Kalpoe Lawyers have the scientific evidence that the tape was manipulated and edited to show that they said "she did" instead of "no, she didn't" and "how simple it was" instead of "how simple it was that night" from the N.F.I. AND AN AMERICAN LAB IN CALIFORNIA.

The results were definite: the tapes were edited, not only for time lapse on the Drd. Phil show, but to change what the Kalpoe kid said!
___________

I think the Kalpoes and the posters at RU and FOB are in for a big surprise when it comes to the tape  :wink:


We have been over this time and time before regarding this tape.  The only part of the tape I ever heard is what was on the news.  It is clear to me that Aruba did something to the tape.  Yes I know it was edited for the show because quite frankly it had to be because there is not enough time to show the tape on one show.  It will be just one more headline to show how corrupt Aruba is and just how far they will go.

I can't wait to see if Deepak shows up or not.  As soon as they see him there will be hatred from everyone because you could tell he is just such an evil individual to try and capitalize on a murder he helped commit.  Either way this sheds a bad light on Aruba.

I wonder if Paulus is uncapping the well in his back yard to put Deepak in there.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #561 12/16 - 12/18/2006
Post by: AZLady on December 16, 2006, 03:48:20 PM
Quote from: "San"

I wonder if Paulus is uncapping the well in his back yard to put Deepak in there.


I bet he would like to add Deepak to the well.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #561 12/16 - 12/18/2006
Post by: San on December 16, 2006, 03:49:16 PM
Quote from: "San"
Quote from: "klaasend"
Just posted by MF at FOB.  This is the kind of BS you would expect from them.

Remember when Uncle Jossy said this on TV las night?:

Jossy: "Well they did confess it, we had the tape analyzed by some experts in Venezuela, it's a legitimate tape and they did admit to having sex but not only on the tape, they admitted to having sex with the girl when she was going in and out of consciousness in the car".

Well, the problem is, the Kalpoe Lawyers have the scientific evidence that the tape was manipulated and edited to show that they said "she did" instead of "no, she didn't" and "how simple it was" instead of "how simple it was that night" from the N.F.I. AND AN AMERICAN LAB IN CALIFORNIA.

The results were definite: the tapes were edited, not only for time lapse on the Drd. Phil show, but to change what the Kalpoe kid said!
___________

I think the Kalpoes and the posters at RU and FOB are in for a big surprise when it comes to the tape  :wink:


We have been over this time and time before regarding this tape.  The only part of the tape I ever heard is what was on the news.  It is clear to me that Aruba did something to the tape.  Yes I know it was edited for the show because quite frankly it had to be because there is not enough time to show the tape on one show.  It will be just one more headline to show how corrupt Aruba is and just how far they will go.

I can't wait to see if Deepak shows up or not.  As soon as they see him there will be hatred from everyone because you could tell he is just such an evil individual to try and capitalize on a murder he helped commit.  Either way this sheds a bad light on Aruba.

I wonder if Paulus is uncapping the well in his back yard to put Deepak in there.

By the way I clearly think he said "she did".

Deepak is a demon.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #561 12/16 - 12/18/2006
Post by: AZLady on December 16, 2006, 03:50:41 PM
There should be no problem with verifying what Deepak said as the FBI have the original harddrive (tape).  The testimony of the FBI will leave no doubt as to what Deepak said.  I have no doubt the judge will accept this as fact.  Time will tell.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #561 12/16 - 12/18/2006
Post by: Altruist on December 16, 2006, 03:51:42 PM
Hope that one of the First if not the FIRST deposition conducted will be that of van der Straaten on the pile of Bonaire.

Take that deposition first lawyers for DR PHIL, CBS, et al.

Someone needs to get on the record what evidence that van der straaten was referring to when he answered the question "what makes you believe that NH is deceased?" & he answered "because I have seen the evidence & you haven't".


Title: Lively Case Discussion #561 12/16 - 12/18/2006
Post by: carpe noctem on December 16, 2006, 03:52:38 PM
Quote from: "LilPuma"
Quote from: "Sleuth"
Quote from: "Katysmom"
When Kock said that an offer had been made, but the Kalpoes turned it down, I wonder if it actually wasn't the other way around.  Perhaps the Kalpoe's told Dr. Phil's people that they would settle for xxx amount of dollars in exchange for not fileing a suit and Dr. Phil told them where to go.


Katysmom - I would believe this before I'd believe Dr. Phil offered a genuine settlement.  I would believe Dr. Phil offered a settlement that would entice them to visit the US, though.


Negotiations of this kind can be used to find out (1) what the other party wants and (2) what they've got - how strong do they feel their case is.  It's like a district attorney offering a plea bargain.  If the DA has a strong case, they're less likely to offer a plea deal.  

Also, I'd bet that Deepak thinks that even if he loses, he'll be in the news and make a name for himself.  Magazines, talk shows, publishers will pay him for interviews and appearances.



Reading the SKEETER transcripts at SCRUX. It's a big window

in to this guys mind for me... I use the term 'GUY' loosely...

cuz he's a 2 bit,  under-acheiving, woman hating punk... ( READ - BOY)

who is not able to fight, yet in his mind, toys with the idea

of beating people up... people who would knock his ass

out on the pavement with  one punch.

His name is Deepak...

but his swiss cheese for a brain...

thinks more like  '2 PAC.'

This kid is a dope. A greedy, direspectful
one at that.

It's all about ME, and more about ME.

He is JORAN LIGHT.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #561 12/16 - 12/18/2006
Post by: San on December 16, 2006, 03:57:33 PM
Quote from: "Altruist"
Hope that one of the First if not the FIRST deposition conducted will be that of van der Straaten on the pile of Bonaire.

Take that deposition first lawyers for DR PHIL, CBS, et al.

Someone needs to get on the record what evidence that van der straaten was referring to when he answered the question "what makes you believe that NH is deceased?" & he answered "because I have seen the evidence & you haven't".

I agree.  Van der Straaten is one dirty cop and notice how no one hears about him anymore.  He was forced into his retirement because they know what he did.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #561 12/16 - 12/18/2006
Post by: carpe noctem on December 16, 2006, 04:01:06 PM
(http://i98.photobucket.com/albums/l266/californialighthousepics1/elameoid.jpg)


Title: Lively Case Discussion #561 12/16 - 12/18/2006
Post by: Altruist on December 16, 2006, 04:03:00 PM
Quote from: "San"
Quote from: "Altruist"
Hope that one of the First if not the FIRST deposition conducted will be that of van der Straaten on the pile of Bonaire.

Take that deposition first lawyers for DR PHIL, CBS, et al.

Someone needs to get on the record what evidence that van der straaten was referring to when he answered the question "what makes you believe that NH is deceased?" & he answered "because I have seen the evidence & you haven't".

I agree.  Van der Straaten is one dirty cop and notice how no one hears about him anymore.  He was forced into his retirement because they know what he did.


Well I don't consider obtaining another appointment as retirement.  Now he is on the pile of Bonaire as the Chief of Police (whatever damn title they assign to the function) to bring corruption there.  The only item mentioned about Bonaire is that van der Straaten wants to bring an updated radar system there to "help defer smuggling", LOL, LOL.  Yeah right, when a paid for shipment comes in that the bribe has been delivered they turn the radar system off, just like they have done on the Devil's Rock.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #561 12/16 - 12/18/2006
Post by: LilPuma on December 16, 2006, 04:03:19 PM
Quote from: "klaasend"
Just posted by MF at FOB.  This is the kind of BS you would expect from them.

Remember when Uncle Jossy said this on TV las night?:

Jossy: "Well they did confess it, we had the tape analyzed by some experts in Venezuela, it's a legitimate tape and they did admit to having sex but not only on the tape, they admitted to having sex with the girl when she was going in and out of consciousness in the car".

Well, the problem is, the Kalpoe Lawyers have the scientific evidence that the tape was manipulated and edited to show that they said "she did" instead of "no, she didn't" and "how simple it was" instead of "how simple it was that night" from the N.F.I. AND AN AMERICAN LAB IN CALIFORNIA.

The results were definite: the tapes were edited, not only for time lapse on the Drd. Phil show, but to change what the Kalpoe kid said!
___________

I think the Kalpoes and the posters at RU and FOB are in for a big surprise when it comes to the tape  :wink:


No doubt in my mind.  I never thought Dr. Phil and Skeeters would be dumb enough to do that AND THEN SEND THE EVIDENCE THAT THEY DID IT TO ARUBA!   :shock:  :shock:  :shock:   That would just be stupid.   But that's where they start to unravel the coverup and fraud in Aruba.   :D


Title: Lively Case Discussion #561 12/16 - 12/18/2006
Post by: Altruist on December 16, 2006, 04:13:08 PM
Regarding DK "nodding no" as he said yes.  The body language that I have observed by those that live on the Devil's Rock is not "normal" but have to say that is the case with many criminals that I have observed on video in the USA.

Normal people's body language matches their verbal utterances, but not criminals.  My personal belief is that it is due to the filtering of information going on within the brain.  The criminal lies even when they tell the truth physically or their body tells the truth when they lie.  Arlene Schipper's body language almost always was the opposite of her utterances, she is a really good example on the Devil's Rock.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #561 12/16 - 12/18/2006
Post by: Kat_Gram on December 16, 2006, 04:18:34 PM
From the Skeeters tape, Deepak has shown what a snivelling rat he is and if he thinks that he had been maligned, well too bad.
He is one of the three prime suspects to this day. He was the driver of the car. He was an adult ( well in years ). He took orders from Joran. He went along with the plan that they had acted out 20 x before. He could have delivered Natalee to the HI as she wanted. He could have stopped it. He could have let her out of the car safely. But he didn't and that shows me what he is made of. Rat Poop. And his brother Junior Rat Poop was also over the age of eighteen.
And now he wants a big pay day .


Title: Lively Case Discussion #561 12/16 - 12/18/2006
Post by: Altruist on December 16, 2006, 04:31:34 PM
"how simple it was" instead of "how simple it was that night"

To me the 2 above statements are the same as Skeeters was only concerned with the night of 5/29-5/30.     Interesting that DK & his representatives think the words "that night" are so necessary.  Wonder why?  What was DK doing the night of 5/30-5/31 when his auto was seen at PVDS home early hours of 5/31 by the 2 sent there by Charles Croes?  Did PVDS have the 2 culprits leave when he got the phone call from ALE disclosing the soon to come arrival of Beth, Jug, et al along with 2 ALE.

Think Charles Croes should also be questioned as to what he believed to be the occurances that he referenced in his internet posting about what horribleness was going to be discovered to have taken place.  Greta "On the Record" has much on video with Charles Croes that was never aired.  Think it would be very good for her to turn it all over to JQK, don't you all?


Title: Lively Case Discussion #561 12/16 - 12/18/2006
Post by: Lala'sMom on December 16, 2006, 04:34:13 PM
Would some really smart monkey please review the Skeeters tape that Klaas left for us from Roger at Scrux and tell me where the comment about Natalee  dressing like a slut is located?  I seem to have missed it and I have read it several times...it must be my eyes. TIA


Title: Lively Case Discussion #561 12/16 - 12/18/2006
Post by: Anna on December 16, 2006, 04:36:42 PM
Good Afternoon, Monkeys,

Very busy day here but a couple of things I want to remind us of:

Remember Justinsmama's thought that at some point when they
were corralling Natalee into the Pimpmobile, she got away from them and went back into C&C and back outside looking confused.  The MB student sitting on a balcony at nearby bar says it was Deepak who went in and drug her out by the arm, up the sidewalk and around the corner.

This he said before it came out that the Pimpmobile was parked in the back of C&C for privacy and rapid get away.

This is mentioned in the HT's filing and is NOT going to look too good for Deepak.  I used to doubt the kid seeing this when he first told it to Dan at RWV but now it makes perfect sense.  Joran let her get away and Deepak was having none of that and went in and drug her out by the arm.

Perhaps this did not happen but this MB kid is on the record saying he saw it right from the start and his testimony will certainly carry a tremendous weight with any jury.



.

(http://i15.photobucket.com/albums/a360/AnnaBlueSkies/Greetings/Holidays/thsanta.gif)

.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #561 12/16 - 12/18/2006
Post by: LilPuma on December 16, 2006, 04:38:33 PM
Quote from: "Lala'sMom"
Would some really smart monkey please review the Skeeters tape that Klaas left for us from Roger at Scrux and tell me where the comment about Natalee  dressing like a slut is located?  I seem to have missed it and I have read it several times...it must be my eyes. TIA


 :shock: I just got back from reading it and was about to post the very same question.  GMTA.   :lol:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #561 12/16 - 12/18/2006
Post by: IndyDan on December 16, 2006, 04:43:49 PM
Hi gang,
I'm way behind, the kids have been down from Chicago visiting since around noon yesterday so I have lots of catching up to do.
Only have a small window right now but was wondering if there's been any news as to when DeVries is going to do his followup show on his investigation.
TIA :D


Title: Lively Case Discussion #561 12/16 - 12/18/2006
Post by: Anna on December 16, 2006, 04:48:45 PM
.
With regard to consent, I seem to recall and someone recently verified that they did as well that Skeeters explained to Deepak that he reserved the right to be taping at any given time during talks.  He might or he might not be taping, at his discretion, etc. and Deepak was agreeable to this.

Skeeters explained that one might know they were being taped or they might not know and he might use video or audio, etc. completely at his own arbitrary will and with or without notification at the time, etc.

Couldn't get much plainer than it was explained.  That should cover any issues of consent to tape.  Now consent to airing on the program might be what the suit is claiming and does anyone remember if Skeeters said he would use the tapes in any manner he chose, etc.?  I would think it was implied that he had the right to air them since he is trying to convince Deepak that Dr. Phil can help him if he is innocent.

Deepak failed to consider that the opposite was also true if he were guilty.

His bad!


(http://i15.photobucket.com/albums/a360/AnnaBlueSkies/Greetings/Holidays/th527789887.gif)


Title: Lively Case Discussion #561 12/16 - 12/18/2006
Post by: Kat_Gram on December 16, 2006, 04:58:46 PM
Quote from: "Lala'sMom"
Would some really smart monkey please review the Skeeters tape that Klaas left for us from Roger at Scrux and tell me where the comment about Natalee  dressing like a slut is located?  I seem to have missed it and I have read it several times...it must be my eyes. TIA

It's not all there. There are parts that I  remember reading, it  was in about five parts. The way she was dressed, it is not here.  
.
Anna, as for the consent part.... Deepak did not give his consent for the tape to be used on the Phil show. There are more issues than just if the tape was altered spelled out in the filing of Deepak. And that was my point about IF an offer was made. It was to address the other items.
Some ppl were taking it that an offer was made, therefore liability was admitted to. Liability for altering the tape. There will be a response item by item in thirty days and by then, we will know more and will know the item by item stance of the defendants.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #561 12/16 - 12/18/2006
Post by: Anna on December 16, 2006, 05:00:36 PM
Quote from: "LilPuma"
Quote from: "Lala'sMom"
Would some really smart monkey please review the Skeeters tape that Klaas left for us from Roger at Scrux and tell me where the comment about Natalee  dressing like a slut is located?  I seem to have missed it and I have read it several times...it must be my eyes. TIA


 :shock: I just got back from reading it and was about to post the very same question.  GMTA.   :lol:



Don't tell me they took that part out as well, LOL!!  Surely not even Roger would be that bad!  I won't go there because it is his site but we all heard that and also the venom in Deepak's voice, a voice that sounds like it could do just about anything to a helpless girl.

I always wondered what it was about Natalee's dress that set him off considering it was very reasonable by Aruban standards.

I really think there are two versions of the tape, one fabricated after it arrived in Aruba by parties unknown and that should bring criminal charges against those entrusted with the custody of the tape as well as those who did this.

Surely Deepak realizes that Skeeters is going to have the original and blow him out of the water.  But as Blah and others were discussing this morning, there is a most peculiar mindset there on that rock.  They seem to think if they lie hard enough, they will be believed.

And I truly believe they are dumb enough to think their version of the tape will be given as much credibility as the hard drive.  We never saw the NFI report, only were told what it supposedly says.  I vewlieve it said manipulated but did not say to change the content, just manipulated.  Of course if was for time constraints.  That is a far cry from manipulated for content.

What I have always heard was "She did AND you'd be surprised. . . "
Their version has the AND very low so as to make it sound more like She Didn't when it is saying She did And.  Very close but the context says from the whoop on that it is in the affirmative.


.(http://i15.photobucket.com/albums/a360/AnnaBlueSkies/Greetings/Holidays/th123345443.gif)


Title: Lively Case Discussion #561 12/16 - 12/18/2006
Post by: Lala'sMom on December 16, 2006, 05:08:06 PM
Well, if we are going to discuss the tape we need the entire thing and not just what Scrux has.  BTW I am referring to the one Klaas posted in this forum. I am sure dear Roger could not have imadvertently omitted that.   Anyone know where I can find the entire transcript?


Title: Lively Case Discussion #561 12/16 - 12/18/2006
Post by: Tylergal on December 16, 2006, 05:15:12 PM
Quote from: "mishy"
This from the Paramount statement in the last thread is very interesting, IMHO:

In a parting shot in its statement, Paramount says, "We also intend to discover who or what has motivated this lawsuit from the Kalpoe brothers, two of the primary suspects in Natalee’s disappearance and two of the last people seen driving away with her in their car."


I think Paramount is saying what we have been saying all along..... "we intend to discover who or what..."


Title: Lively Case Discussion #561 12/16 - 12/18/2006
Post by: Anna on December 16, 2006, 05:17:06 PM
Kat Gram,
Yes, I can't wait for the response, should be intersting.  But I think Deepak's consent is implied with his allowing the tape to be made.  Otherwise wouldn't be much sense in making it.  Also it was aired in CA and not in Aruba so I tend to think the taped version of permission would be the one that applies instead of the alleged Aruban demand for written permission.

How very Roger for him to leave out the dressed like a slut hate speech.  That is why I won't go there as I am not so sure I buy his lately claims of now thinking Joran guilty of something.  He's just not my cup of tea and I will leave it at that.   :wink:

Late in the game conversions tend to make me think somebody just finally sold those pesky timeshares and so are not trustworthy.

But he has the only transcript posted that I am aware of albeit of the version from Aruba so I guess that is the place to read it.  It is the untampered hard drive that counts when all is said and done.  He does not have that.

(http://i15.photobucket.com/albums/a360/AnnaBlueSkies/Greetings/Holidays/th68117.gif)

.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #561 12/16 - 12/18/2006
Post by: Tylergal on December 16, 2006, 05:20:56 PM
Quote from: "AZLady"
Kat, it is possible that the only tape the Kalpoes and their attorneys have is the one that the Arubans tampered with and modified to reflect their own interpretation.  It might not be identical to the original tape the FBI holds.  If this is the case, Deepak and Satish have lied to their attorneys.  That won't be pretty.


I think most of us here will recall that the witch was with the ALE when they received it and were viewing it.  Perhaps, she was called to help them alter the tape.  She definitely told us she was there.  No way around that chit.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #561 12/16 - 12/18/2006
Post by: Anna on December 16, 2006, 05:24:10 PM
.
The attorney on Greta last night making her glow was saying that this is yet another jurisdictional problem but I don't see how the Kelpoes can say CA has jurisdiction over them in one case but not in another.

Also even though the HT's are not named as a plaintiff, Beth especially is constantly quoted.  If they did not allow for her having the right to have any say about anything, she should not have been brought into their complaint.  Since they did so, I hardly think the court can ignore her own claims.

Well, at least we have time limits in CA and they are not two years so we will be getting answers pretty quickly on what the response is.

.

(http://i15.photobucket.com/albums/a360/AnnaBlueSkies/Greetings/Holidays/thart_0335.gif)


Title: Lively Case Discussion #561 12/16 - 12/18/2006
Post by: Tylergal on December 16, 2006, 05:25:16 PM
Quote from: "San"
Quote from: "San"
Quote from: "klaasend"
Just posted by MF at FOB.  This is the kind of BS you would expect from them.

Remember when Uncle Jossy said this on TV las night?:

Jossy: "Well they did confess it, we had the tape analyzed by some experts in Venezuela, it's a legitimate tape and they did admit to having sex but not only on the tape, they admitted to having sex with the girl when she was going in and out of consciousness in the car".

Well, the problem is, the Kalpoe Lawyers have the scientific evidence that the tape was manipulated and edited to show that they said "she did" instead of "no, she didn't" and "how simple it was" instead of "how simple it was that night" from the N.F.I. AND AN AMERICAN LAB IN CALIFORNIA.

The results were definite: the tapes were edited, not only for time lapse on the Drd. Phil show, but to change what the Kalpoe kid said!
___________

I think the Kalpoes and the posters at RU and FOB are in for a big surprise when it comes to the tape  :wink:


We have been over this time and time before regarding this tape.  The only part of the tape I ever heard is what was on the news.  It is clear to me that Aruba did something to the tape.  Yes I know it was edited for the show because quite frankly it had to be because there is not enough time to show the tape on one show.  It will be just one more headline to show how corrupt Aruba is and just how far they will go.

I can't wait to see if Deepak shows up or not.  As soon as they see him there will be hatred from everyone because you could tell he is just such an evil individual to try and capitalize on a murder he helped commit.  Either way this sheds a bad light on Aruba.

I wonder if Paulus is uncapping the well in his back yard to put Deepak in there.

By the way I clearly think he said "she did".

Deepak is a demon.


In my business, I am trained to "guess" what people are saying (particularly those with foreign accents)' and I heard "she did 'n' you would be surprised how easy ..." (she did and you would be surprised), not she didn't!


Title: Lively Case Discussion #561 12/16 - 12/18/2006
Post by: Tylergal on December 16, 2006, 05:27:56 PM
Quote from: "Lala'sMom"
Would some really smart monkey please review the Skeeters tape that Klaas left for us from Roger at Scrux and tell me where the comment about Natalee  dressing like a slut is located?  I seem to have missed it and I have read it several times...it must be my eyes. TIA


You have to bear in mind who transcribed this.  It was the church sisters who sold themselves out early on.  Of course, they transcribed what dear old Raj told them to transcribe.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #561 12/16 - 12/18/2006
Post by: Altruist on December 16, 2006, 05:28:10 PM
Quote from: "Lala'sMom"
Would some really smart monkey please review the Skeeters tape that Klaas left for us from Roger at Scrux and tell me where the comment about Natalee  dressing like a slut is located?  I seem to have missed it and I have read it several times...it must be my eyes. TIA


It isn't there Lala'sMom.  Think that Klaas thought she copied it all but it was obviously at capacity of her copy ability so it was cut off.  I will see if I can copy it from that point.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #561 12/16 - 12/18/2006
Post by: Tylergal on December 16, 2006, 05:29:38 PM
Quote from: "Anna"
Good Afternoon, Monkeys,

Very busy day here but a couple of things I want to remind us of:

Remember Justinsmama's thought that at some point when they
were corralling Natalee into the Pimpmobile, she got away from them and went back into C&C and back outside looking confused.  The MB student sitting on a balcony at nearby bar says it was Deepak who went in and drug her out by the arm, up the sidewalk and around the corner.

This he said before it came out that the Pimpmobile was parked in the back of C&C for privacy and rapid get away.

This is mentioned in the HT's filing and is NOT going to look too good for Deepak.  I used to doubt the kid seeing this when he first told it to Dan at RWV but now it makes perfect sense.  Joran let her get away and Deepak was having none of that and went in and drug her out by the arm.

Perhaps this did not happen but this MB kid is on the record saying he saw it right from the start and his testimony will certainly carry a tremendous weight with any jury.



.

(http://i15.photobucket.com/albums/a360/AnnaBlueSkies/Greetings/Holidays/thsanta.gif)

.


I recall that, Anna.  He stated Natalee went out, seemed to be looking for someone, then went back in and when she came out she was being led by Deepak to his car which had been moved to an area back and beyond C&C.  He was sitting on the balcony of ?Bahia? and had a good view.  He is the one who wished 1000 times he had stopped her.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #561 12/16 - 12/18/2006
Post by: Anna on December 16, 2006, 05:30:48 PM
Quote from: "Tylergal"
[In my business, I am trained to "guess" what people are saying (particularly those with foreign accents)' and I heard "she did 'n' you would be surprised how easy ..." (she did and you would be surprised), not she didn't!



I have always thought your explanation the best on this, Tyler.  And that is exactly what I hear as well.  And even more so if you start an air conditioner in the middle of it and turn down the volume for the 'n' part.  Or have Deepak do a voice over.

Wasn't Steve Cohen on Dr. Phil's program when the tape was aired?  Was that the one where he lost his job?

.

(http://i15.photobucket.com/albums/a360/AnnaBlueSkies/Greetings/Holidays/thani_globes012.gif)


Title: Lively Case Discussion #561 12/16 - 12/18/2006
Post by: Anna on December 16, 2006, 05:33:46 PM
Quote from: "Altruist"
Hope that one of the First if not the FIRST deposition conducted will be that of van der Straaten on the pile of Bonaire.

Take that deposition first lawyers for DR PHIL, CBS, et al.

Someone needs to get on the record what evidence that van der straaten was referring to when he answered the question "what makes you believe that NH is deceased?" & he answered "because I have seen the evidence & you haven't".


An excellent starting point, let's first establish why they all seem to think Natalee is dead and yet no one had one thing to do with it.


(http://i15.photobucket.com/albums/a360/AnnaBlueSkies/Greetings/Holidays/thbirds17.gif)


Title: Lively Case Discussion #561 12/16 - 12/18/2006
Post by: Tylergal on December 16, 2006, 05:33:58 PM
Quote from: "Anna"
Quote from: "Tylergal"
[In my business, I am trained to "guess" what people are saying (particularly those with foreign accents)' and I heard "she did 'n' you would be surprised how easy ..." (she did and you would be surprised), not she didn't!



I have always thought your explanation the best on this, Tyler.  And that is exactly what I hear as well.  And even more so if you start an air conditioner in the middle of it and turn down the volume for the 'n' part.  Or have Deepak do a voice over.

Wasn't Steve Cohen on Dr. Phil's program when the tape was aired?  Was that the one where he lost his job?

No, Cohen was still flacking for them at Christmas last year, because it was around Christmas that Red was on via telephone with Cohen (Court TV, I think).  
.

(http://i15.photobucket.com/albums/a360/AnnaBlueSkies/Greetings/Holidays/thani_globes012.gif)


Title: Lively Case Discussion #561 12/16 - 12/18/2006
Post by: Lala'sMom on December 16, 2006, 05:34:53 PM
Quote from: "Altruist"
Quote from: "Lala'sMom"
Would some really smart monkey please review the Skeeters tape that Klaas left for us from Roger at Scrux and tell me where the comment about Natalee  dressing like a slut is located?  I seem to have missed it and I have read it several times...it must be my eyes. TIA


It isn't there Lala'sMom.  Think that Klaas thought she copied it all but it was obviously at capacity of her copy ability so it was cut off.  I will see if I can copy it from that point.


Oh I know it wasn't Klaas that did this.  I just want to be sure I heard that part about the way she dressed.  I was thinking maybe Deepak's attorney only heard the part about "did" and "didn't" and not what he really thinks about Natalee...(sarcasm here).


Title: Lively Case Discussion #561 12/16 - 12/18/2006
Post by: Tylergal on December 16, 2006, 05:35:06 PM
Quote from: "Anna"
Quote from: "Tylergal"
[In my business, I am trained to "guess" what people are saying (particularly those with foreign accents)' and I heard "she did 'n' you would be surprised how easy ..." (she did and you would be surprised), not she didn't!



I have always thought your explanation the best on this, Tyler.  And that is exactly what I hear as well.  And even more so if you start an air conditioner in the middle of it and turn down the volume for the 'n' part.  Or have Deepak do a voice over.

Wasn't Steve Cohen on Dr. Phil's program when the tape was aired?  Was that the one where he lost his job?

.

(http://i15.photobucket.com/albums/a360/AnnaBlueSkies/Greetings/Holidays/thani_globes012.gif)


I am not sure who has interpreted that tape for the Dutch but I know some pretty good people who do that, very professional.  I wish I had had a whack at it.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #561 12/16 - 12/18/2006
Post by: Lala'sMom on December 16, 2006, 05:36:13 PM
Quote from: "Anna"
Quote from: "Tylergal"
[In my business, I am trained to "guess" what people are saying (particularly those with foreign accents)' and I heard "she did 'n' you would be surprised how easy ..." (she did and you would be surprised), not she didn't!



I have always thought your explanation the best on this, Tyler.  And that is exactly what I hear as well.  And even more so if you start an air conditioner in the middle of it and turn down the volume for the 'n' part.  Or have Deepak do a voice over.

Wasn't Steve Cohen on Dr. Phil's program when the tape was aired?  Was that the one where he lost his job?

And didn't Stevie boy even admit he thought they did something to her or with her?  I forget.

.

(http://i15.photobucket.com/albums/a360/AnnaBlueSkies/Greetings/Holidays/thani_globes012.gif)


Title: Lively Case Discussion #561 12/16 - 12/18/2006
Post by: Tylergal on December 16, 2006, 05:36:28 PM
Lala's, to your question about Deepak being on autopilot since he was able to see so much of what was going on in the backseat, I answer you the following:  To me he was watching it on his monitor that is in the vicinity of his sunvisor, and we already know he had one.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #561 12/16 - 12/18/2006
Post by: igsigs on December 16, 2006, 05:37:47 PM
Quote from: "Sleuth"
Quote from: "mishy"
This from the Paramount statement in the last thread is very interesting, IMHO:

In a parting shot in its statement, Paramount says, "We also intend to discover who or what has motivated this lawsuit from the Kalpoe brothers, two of the primary suspects in Natalee’s disappearance and two of the last people seen driving away with her in their car."


Yes, this will be very interesting.  Both the who and the what aspects.  At first blush you would think it is $ motivating it, but I don't think so.

I don't think so either, Sleuth. Dr. Phil is public enemy no.1 in Aruba because his show was used as a launching pad for the boycott. Who has suffered the most because of his show? It isn't the Kalpoes.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #561 12/16 - 12/18/2006
Post by: Tylergal on December 16, 2006, 05:39:04 PM
I do trust that those of you who saved all the BonAir transcripts have forwarded all that information to JQK, since there were many times when it was stated several times by said poster that she had full access to the dossier and she was arguing legal points based on having seen it.  If that is the case, I would think we might be seeing the "bad witch" under oath at some point.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #561 12/16 - 12/18/2006
Post by: Lala'sMom on December 16, 2006, 05:43:05 PM
Sorry I really messed up that post...my apologies. :oops:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #561 12/16 - 12/18/2006
Post by: Anna on December 16, 2006, 05:43:11 PM
.
Some were discussing the odd mindset in Aruba this morning and I will have to say I think this really plays into all of this.  It is the oddest I have ever encountered.

How on earth they think themselves the victims is just beyond me.  Natalee is missing and just about certainly dead, murdered in some way or other through drug OD or violence, we do not even know.

And yet, they are victims.  Something about the Dr. Phil show also really set them off.  They seem to think this entire country is tuned in daily awaiting our marching orders.  I like Dr. Phil but don't ever watch it as it falls at the wrong time of day for me.  I doubt I watch it twice a year.

And that is like their thinking Beth can magically make us boycott when I think we would be doing this with or without her blessing on it.

Not sure what you call that.  Maybe looking for a target to blame for their own failures or something like that but it is very strange.  Their reaction to things is just not normal.  Little things like saying Beth does not behave in the proper way for someone with a child missing.  HELLO!  There is no proper way!

Anita saying her own son is not safe for a girl to even get into a car with, all of it is just mind boggling.  Their minds are warped and badly.

.(http://i15.photobucket.com/albums/a360/AnnaBlueSkies/Greetings/Holidays/thholiday_events_71-1.gif)


Title: Lively Case Discussion #561 12/16 - 12/18/2006
Post by: Lala'sMom on December 16, 2006, 05:44:30 PM
Quote from: "Tylergal"
Lala's, to your question about Deepak being on autopilot since he was able to see so much of what was going on in the backseat, I answer you the following:  To me he was watching it on his monitor that is in the vicinity of his sunvisor, and we already know he had one.


So true. I forgot about the rolling pimpmobile. Dang!  Where's my mind? :roll:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #561 12/16 - 12/18/2006
Post by: Altruist on December 16, 2006, 05:45:31 PM
Is anybody on right now a member at Scrux.com????

This is where the copy ends of:
Deepak Kalpoe: (unintelligible) Like Natalee, she has a trust fund, they can have,and they
have her a bank account open. It's a Natalee Holloway (unintelligible)... so. My mom got fired a few weeks because of this. They are afraid of a scandal.

Jamie Skeeters: See there’s a good examp


It's way into the interview, so alot closer to the end than the beginning.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #561 12/16 - 12/18/2006
Post by: San on December 16, 2006, 05:45:49 PM
Quote from: "Altruist"
Quote from: "San"
Quote from: "Altruist"
Hope that one of the First if not the FIRST deposition conducted will be that of van der Straaten on the pile of Bonaire.

Take that deposition first lawyers for DR PHIL, CBS, et al.

Someone needs to get on the record what evidence that van der straaten was referring to when he answered the question "what makes you believe that NH is deceased?" & he answered "because I have seen the evidence & you haven't".

I agree.  Van der Straaten is one dirty cop and notice how no one hears about him anymore.  He was forced into his retirement because they know what he did.


Well I don't consider obtaining another appointment as retirement. Now he is on the pile of Bonaire as the Chief of Police (whatever damn title they assign to the function) to bring corruption there.  The only item mentioned about Bonaire is that van der Straaten wants to bring an updated radar system there to "help defer smuggling", LOL, LOL.  Yeah right, when a paid for shipment comes in that the bribe has been delivered they turn the radar system off, just like they have done on the Devil's Rock.

Yes you are right he did get another appointment.  I was referencing his job on Aruba at the time.  We had an Aruban poster here posting that he was retiring and it was planned before all this happened.  I never believe that for one second.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #561 12/16 - 12/18/2006
Post by: Altruist on December 16, 2006, 05:49:58 PM
Yes, I remember that as well, there were a number of misdirections & misinformation coming from that direction.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #561 12/16 - 12/18/2006
Post by: Anna on December 16, 2006, 05:50:12 PM
Oh, my, don't get me started on that trust fund they have all been drooling over since it was set up!  You'd think it was the Carnagie-Mellon instead of something fueled by cookouts and selling bracelets!

I must go make order out of chaos but save my place as I will be back later first chance I get!


(http://i15.photobucket.com/albums/a360/AnnaBlueSkies/Greetings/Holidays/thchristmasnorn.gif)


Title: Lively Case Discussion #561 12/16 - 12/18/2006
Post by: mishy on December 16, 2006, 05:50:45 PM
Quote from: Kat_Gram
Quote from: "mishy"
This from the Paramount statement in the last thread is very interesting, IMHO:



Kat_Gram, here ya go:

PARAMOUNT Studios Speaks

http://www.eonline.com/news/article/index.jsp?uuid=842d5b63-98c9-4603-8e5e-b8c93c596c2d&page=2


He usually focuses on relationship problems, but even Dr. Phil couldn't resist joining the media circus surrounding the Natalie Holloway case. And now it may cost him.

Deepak and Satish Kalpoe, teenage brothers who were once considered prime suspects in the 18-year-old's May 30, 2005, disappearance while vacationing in Aruba, is suing the Dr. Phil show, claiming they were defamed on national TV.

The lawsuit, filed Wednesday in Los Angeles Superior Court, accuses McGraw, along with private investigator Jamie Skeeters and the CBS Television Group, of committing libel and slander, invasion of privacy, emotional distress, fraud, deceit and civil conspiracy by editing and airing an interview between Skeeters and Deepak Kalpoe to suggest the brothers somehow committed a crime.

The show's producer, Paramount Studios, slammed the lawsuit. "We stand by the integrity of the Dr. Phil show, our editing process and the accuracy of the program that we aired. We will vigorously defend against these baseless claims."

The episode in question aired Sept. 15, 2005, on the nationally syndicated show, days after the brothers were released from custody by Aruban police. Holloway was last seen getting in a car with the siblings and Dutch teen Joran Van Der Sloot, but authorities said they lacked sufficient evidence to hold the teens, in part because investigators could not determine whether Holloway was dead or alive since her body had yet to be found.

The complaint states that Skeeter secretly videotaped an interview with Deepak Kalpoe and then aired the illicit recording on Dr. Phil—after cutting it in such a way as to "create false, incriminating and defamatory statements that the plaintiffs engaged in criminal activity against Natalee Holloway."

Per court documents, McGraw & Co. specifically implied that the siblings slipped Holloway a date-rape drug, forced her to have nonconsensual sex and then supposedly aided in killing her and hiding the body, allegations which the Kalpoes and Van Der Sloot have denied.

But Paramount disputes the charge. "Deepak Kalpoe’s statements, which aired on the Dr. Phil show, were his own words presented in a manner that the show believed accurately reflected the sum and substance of what he said in a recorded interview with Jamie Skeeters in Aruba."

The suit claims Deepak Kalpoe agreed to the sit-down with the P.I. in the assumption that Skeeter might help clear him and his brother. Skeeter allegedly told Kalpoe that the gruff McGraw was a "god" who could "influence a country" and help their case.

After months of searching for the missing young woman, Aruban investigators shifted their probe away from the brothers and Van Der Sloot to pursue other leads. The case remains unsolved.

A lawyer for the Kalpoes could not be reached for comment Friday. Their suit seeks unspecified general, special and punitive damages.

In a parting shot in its statement, Paramount says, "We also intend to discover who or what has motivated this lawsuit from the Kalpoe brothers, two of the primary suspects in Natalee’s disappearance and two of the last people seen driving away with her in their car."

Shortly after the Kalpoes took legal action against Dr. Phil, Holloway's parents fired back.

Beth Twitty and Dave Holloway filed a civil wrongful-death suit against the teens Thursday in Los Angeles Superior Court, accusing them of causing their daughter's death by "intentionally, negligently, wantonly...unlawfully conducting themselves" in a way that brought about fatal injuries.

"All we want is justice for our daughter. There is no doubt in my mind that Deepak and Satish played a role in my daughter's death and should be held accountable," Beth Twitty said. "It is unconscionable that they have not been punished so far."
_________________


Title: Lively Case Discussion #561 12/16 - 12/18/2006
Post by: Altruist on December 16, 2006, 05:52:07 PM
Think it was as late as last week somebody pointed out that van der straaten & she were neighbors.  I consider that a blatant holding back of information that had it been ME would have been proferred from the start.

Deviousness abounds on the Devil's Rock.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #561 12/16 - 12/18/2006
Post by: Hotshot on December 16, 2006, 05:55:35 PM
Quote from: "Lala'sMom"
Well, if we are going to discuss the tape we need the entire thing and not just what Scrux has.  BTW I am referring to the one Klaas posted in this forum. I am sure dear Roger could not have imadvertently omitted that.   Anyone know where I can find the entire transcript?
Here is one important part of the tape
http://arubassilence.bravehost.com/Skeeter.htmlI have the full DVD, but since my computer crashed I would have to find the "slut" part, and then try to upload it for you to hear. does anyone know how many minutes into it where that is all said?


Title: Lively Case Discussion #561 12/16 - 12/18/2006
Post by: Altruist on December 16, 2006, 05:58:03 PM
http://www.scaredmonkeys.net/viewtopic.php?t=648

This is where the transcript that Klaas copied over at Scrux is so you can see how long it is.

Thanks Hotshot.


Title: The Industry
Post by: IBE on December 16, 2006, 05:58:53 PM
Re: The Industry

[bold]Kat_Gram said:[/bold]
Whoever has the deepest pockets usually wins.
And the most power seen and unseen. It's the unseen one worries about.

[bold]mishy wrote:[/bold]
This from the Paramount statement in the last thread is very interesting, IMHO:
'"In a parting shot in its statement, Paramount says, "We also intend to discover who or what has motivated this lawsuit from the Kalpoe brothers, two of the primary suspects in Natalee’s disappearance and two of the last people seen driving away with her in their car."'

Yes this statement says a lot especially "intend to discover who or what"

I spent 3 decades in the Industry.. 5 years as a Union Bus. Agent/Negotiator. You do not want to mess with this Industry. Their arms are very long.

Was involved an high profile investigation/court case, making a difference between a civil and criminal case and had the lugs loosen on a wheel and a man caught in front of my home with a gun.

Individuals in the Industry are great; but you have to be prepared for them digging up any dirt et al in your life if you are in court with them, as is done is some other court cases also. Some testified on the case were blackballed in the Industry; one had his car run off the road, another committed suicide; one was conveniently moved in her job to another city.

All this brings back memories. But it might be the best that has ever happened to get Justice for Natalee

Does UPS truck the pkgs or fly them on reg. shipping. The pkg left Louisville 1AM on Thurs. Still have some hrs. left here for a delivery.
oh I hear a truck

And re: mail boxes... if you have earthlink you can get mailboxes that anonymous and free (sp)

Monkeys Keep up the Good Work!

IBE

PS Klaas, dress warm; it's getting "cold" and going to rain.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #561 12/16 - 12/18/2006
Post by: Tylergal on December 16, 2006, 06:06:42 PM
IBE, what kind of shipping did you request?  They gave me several options and I opted for pony express because nowadays mail is air mail and I figure with all the Christmas stuff, an old pony is as good as a horse when it is having to wait on loads and loads and lines and lines.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #561 12/16 - 12/18/2006
Post by: sirensong on December 16, 2006, 06:07:28 PM
Crazybabyborg:


Thanks for the movie; I for one thought it was awesome! Thanks for sharing.

WOW!  I am so excited about this latest development in the case.  Hopefully the truth followed by some justice will be on it's way!  

Hope everyone is doing well and having fun getting ready for the holidays! Klass, love the tree you made!


Title: Lively Case Discussion #561 12/16 - 12/18/2006
Post by: igsigs on December 16, 2006, 06:13:04 PM
Coverage tonight on FOX...The Lineup / Guilfoyle 10pm EST


Title: Lively Case Discussion #561 12/16 - 12/18/2006
Post by: Tylergal on December 16, 2006, 06:23:25 PM
CBB, thanks for the "Silent Night" movie.  I thoroughly enjoyed it.

Klaas, I hope your visit with the extended family was very nice.  

Just wanted everyone to know --- how much they are appreciated and each one adds something to the case for Natalee's justice, even though some are more silent and lurk, it is what is in each and every heart.  Not all of us are as eloquent as Anna and not all of us bring the daily news like Leslie, not all of us have the wherewithal to interpret the statements like CBB and not all have the analytical abilities of Lala's, but we all contribute in some way for "right," and when we are right, and we are tenacious, as this group  is, justice will come. . . . perhaps not on our time schedule but it will come.

At this time of year, I have to mention how this is a lot like prayer.  I often find myself "telling" the Lord how to solve my problems.  I know that is wrong and they are never solved in the way I thought they would be, but in a way I would have never thought of and we have to be patient because He knows best and He is in charge of Natalee's justice and we must pray that His will be done and that Natalee's family will have the answers.

I hope this is a blessed Christmas for each and everyone and that Christmas will bring us good news, but first I think we need to offer thanks to Him who hears us in our prayers, in our hearts, and thank Him for giving us Klaas, Red, Mrs. Red & Tom, for without them, we would all be scattered in the wilderness, seeking solace and a place to voice our hearts and our concerns and we need to ask His guidance that Beth & Dave and their families pursue a course that is pleasing in His eyes and that He will give them the strength to pursue this until justice prevails for their precious daughter.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #561 12/16 - 12/18/2006
Post by: Leslie on December 16, 2006, 06:23:35 PM
MsMarple wrote:  A man has been accused of killing a 4-month old child, I think his own; "DNA" is mentioned in the article.
Quote:
Diabierna na corte a tuma lugar e caso den cual Ferdinand Alexander D. a wordo acusa di a mata Alexander D. E caso aki a impacta comunidad di Aruba, mirando cu e homber a wordo acusa di a mata su propio baby di 4 luna.
--
His name is Ferdinand Alexander Dijkhoff...sound familiar?


Title: Lively Case Discussion #561 12/16 - 12/18/2006
Post by: justinsmama on December 16, 2006, 06:32:29 PM
eonline should research a bit deeper before making statements such as the following:

Quote
...who were once considered prime suspects...

They remain prime suspects.

and

Quote
After months of searching for the missing young woman, Aruban investigators shifted their probe away from the brothers and Van Der Sloot to pursue other leads. The case remains unsolved.

The Aruban probe has never been on JvdS/K2. The case has been solved. Aruba and we know who are responsible for Nat's disappearance, and it aint no illiusionist magician.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #561 12/16 - 12/18/2006
Post by: cubbeegirl on December 16, 2006, 06:35:21 PM
Alright,,, fess up, what kind of movie did I miss?


Title: Lively Case Discussion #561 12/16 - 12/18/2006
Post by: IBE on December 16, 2006, 06:35:32 PM
Hi,

Regular shipping, I guess. Didn't think I needed it in a hurry... am just excited, I guess,     Like a care package from home

Merry Christmas and Happy Holidays, all.

Here another truck... gads See, I want to wear it out in LA..  should have ordered a sweat shirt..

Any clicks we can make to amazon.com also help Red and Tom.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #561 12/16 - 12/18/2006
Post by: cubbeegirl on December 16, 2006, 06:36:56 PM
Quote from: "klaasend"
Just posted by MF at FOB.  This is the kind of BS you would expect from them.

Remember when Uncle Jossy said this on TV las night?:

Jossy: "Well they did confess it, we had the tape analyzed by some experts in Venezuela, it's a legitimate tape and they did admit to having sex but not only on the tape, they admitted to having sex with the girl when she was going in and out of consciousness in the car".

Well, the problem is, the Kalpoe Lawyers have the scientific evidence that the tape was manipulated and edited to show that they said "she did" instead of "no, she didn't" and "how simple it was" instead of "how simple it was that night" from the N.F.I. AND AN AMERICAN LAB IN CALIFORNIA.

The results were definite: the tapes were edited, not only for time lapse on the Drd. Phil show, but to change what the Kalpoe kid said!
___________

I think the Kalpoes and the posters at RU and FOB are in for a big surprise when it comes to the tape  :wink:




ohhhh klaas.... I just love surprises.... :wink:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #561 12/16 - 12/18/2006
Post by: justinsmama on December 16, 2006, 06:39:57 PM
Quote from: "cubbeegirl"
Quote from: "klaasend"
Just posted by MF at FOB.  This is the kind of BS you would expect from them.

Remember when Uncle Jossy said this on TV las night?:

Jossy: "Well they did confess it, we had the tape analyzed by some experts in Venezuela, it's a legitimate tape and they did admit to having sex but not only on the tape, they admitted to having sex with the girl when she was going in and out of consciousness in the car".

Well, the problem is, the Kalpoe Lawyers have the scientific evidence that the tape was manipulated and edited to show that they said "she did" instead of "no, she didn't" and "how simple it was" instead of "how simple it was that night" from the N.F.I. AND AN AMERICAN LAB IN CALIFORNIA.

The results were definite: the tapes were edited, not only for time lapse on the Drd. Phil show, but to change what the Kalpoe kid said!
___________

I think the Kalpoes and the posters at RU and FOB are in for a big surprise when it comes to the tape  :wink:




ohhhh klaas.... I just love surprises.... :wink:


And just in time for Christmas! LOL!


Title: Lively Case Discussion #561 12/16 - 12/18/2006
Post by: crazybabyborg on December 16, 2006, 06:41:33 PM
Quote from: "Tylergal"
CBB, thanks for the "Silent Night" movie.  I thoroughly enjoyed it.

Klaas, I hope your visit with the extended family was very nice.  

Just wanted everyone to know --- how much they are appreciated and each one adds something to the case for Natalee's justice, even though some are more silent and lurk, it is what is in each and every heart.  Not all of us are as eloquent as Anna and not all of us bring the daily news like Leslie, not all of us have the wherewithal to interpret the statements like CBB and not all have the analytical abilities of Lala's, but we all contribute in some way for "right," and when we are right, and we are tenacious, as this group  is, justice will come. . . . perhaps not on our time schedule but it will come.

At this time of year, I have to mention how this is a lot like prayer.  I often find myself "telling" the Lord how to solve my problems.  I know that is wrong and they are never solved in the way I thought they would be, but in a way I would have never thought of and we have to be patient because He knows best and He is in charge of Natalee's justice and we must pray that His will be done and that Natalee's family will have the answers.

I hope this is a blessed Christmas for each and everyone and that Christmas will bring us good news, but first I think we need to offer thanks to Him who hears us in our prayers, in our hearts, and thank Him for giving us Klaas, Red, Mrs. Red & Tom, for without them, we would all be scattered in the wilderness, seeking solace and a place to voice our hearts and our concerns and we need to ask His guidance that Beth & Dave and their families pursue a course that is pleasing in His eyes and that He will give them the strength to pursue this until justice prevails for their precious daughter.


Made me cry, Tyler. You have such a gift for touching the heart! Yep, I have the feeling there are many hearts here, knit together with a common Spirit. Sometimes I flirt with the feeling of lonliness, but your post is one of the many reminders left for me along my way that I am always Blessed with "connectedness". Thank You, Tyler!


Title: Lively Case Discussion #561 12/16 - 12/18/2006
Post by: crazybabyborg on December 16, 2006, 06:48:06 PM
Quote from: "cubbeegirl"
Alright,,, fess up, what kind of movie did I miss?


Here, Cubbie. My Christmas Card for all the beautiful monkeys! The link is below the card and I HOPE it doesn't blow the margins!


(http://i25.photobucket.com/albums/c100/crazybabyborgs/ChristmasCardcopy.jpg)


http://www.asilentnightmovie.com/


Title: Lively Case Discussion #561 12/16 - 12/18/2006
Post by: Altruist on December 16, 2006, 06:48:20 PM
Just had a thought.

There was alot of publicity regarding Jamie Skeeters tape of DK & why was there so much publicity?  Because the CD sent by Skeeters to ALE had been altered.

Now, from reading the transcript of the tape it is evident that DK attorney has convinced DK that DK doesn't have anything to worry about criminally, that he should keep his mouth shut so that he can make big $$'s in the future for people to hear his story in books, movie, interviews & publications THAT HE WILL BE PAID FOR.

Now then we see JVDS going ON THE RECORD with his stories that of course ALE will have access to.

So JVDS is going on the record, DK is following advice of attorney cuz he thinks he is going to make loads of $$$$'s, in the meantime JVDS goes on his campaign of publicity.

Me thinks that DK has been tricked in a big way, if he & SK are innocent of any wrong doing, going public would have been the way to go as it was the right thing to do & MAYBE then a financial benefit would have gone their way but they didn't do that.  DK greed got in the way of him doing the right thing & it will be his downfall for their is no other reasonable explanation for not coming forth with the truth in total other than him being involved as an accomplice.

Think DK attorney has a secret that PVDS is being paid a favor for?  Seems the only attorney who may have been clean is Antonio Carlos.  But who knows for sure?


Title: Lively Case Discussion #561 12/16 - 12/18/2006
Post by: crazybabyborg on December 16, 2006, 06:50:20 PM
Klaas................I'm so sorry! Can I do anything at this point to resize??

 :oops:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #561 12/16 - 12/18/2006
Post by: cubbeegirl on December 16, 2006, 06:51:04 PM
Tyler, that was so sweet..... :cry:

And, since you always know the answer to these questions I have an O/T question for you.....
We are going to Illinois for the holidays and my orange tree is loaded with yummy , juicy oranges and I would like to take some with me to share with my family as they so enjoy them. Do you have any suggestions as to the best way to handle them? TYIA


Title: Lively Case Discussion #561 12/16 - 12/18/2006
Post by: robots on December 16, 2006, 06:57:45 PM
Quote from: "cubbeegirl"
Tyler, that was so sweet..... :cry:

And, since you always know the answer to these questions I have an O/T question for you.....
We are going to Illinois for the holidays and my orange tree is loaded with yummy , juicy oranges and I would like to take some with me to share with my family as they so enjoy them. Do you have any suggestions as to the best way to handle them? TYIA


HANDLE LIKE EGGS




 :oops:





 :twisted:  :twisted:  :lol:  :lol:  :lol:  :lol:  :lol:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #561 12/16 - 12/18/2006
Post by: IBE on December 16, 2006, 06:58:01 PM
Altruist

Maybe a move to the US is in his thinking; then declare he can't go back to Aruba for he won't be safe.

Don't know... too bad someone decided to weave these webs of lies. I still don't think some of them "get it". I think some have taken on more "that they can chew" as used to be said; in too deep to get out now.

Maybe they can find "it" on eBay. :lol:  :lol:

Off to prepare the medicine cab for painting and a turkey pot pie


Title: Lively Case Discussion #561 12/16 - 12/18/2006
Post by: robots on December 16, 2006, 06:59:08 PM
i think K2 are gonna sing sing sing

 8)


Title: Lively Case Discussion #561 12/16 - 12/18/2006
Post by: cubbeegirl on December 16, 2006, 06:59:49 PM
CBB, that was beautiful, it made me teary....Thank you, I wish I were as talented as some of you other monkeys....


Title: Lively Case Discussion #561 12/16 - 12/18/2006
Post by: cubbeegirl on December 16, 2006, 07:00:29 PM
Quote from: "robots"
i think K2 are gonna sing sing sing

 8)



I think so too robots.... I hope so....


Title: Lively Case Discussion #561 12/16 - 12/18/2006
Post by: crazybabyborg on December 16, 2006, 07:12:49 PM
It seems to me that testimony from the FBI, who has Skeeters hard drive, would be all that was needed to clear up K2s allegations against Dr. Phil's supposedly altering the essence of the tape. I mean any judge would put a lot of weight in the FBI's analysis and conclusions.

I wonder if this will be heard in front of a judge or jury?

Considering the OJ case, I think I'm hoping for a judge. Although the civil case didn't go his way. Was that one in front of a jury? I think it was.


Title: Browsers
Post by: IBE on December 16, 2006, 07:31:17 PM
Last night and this AM we had a discussion about Browsers. Just a side line on  them.. many Monkeys would mention the site meter in a green box at the bottom of the page... in Netscape all I saw was a dot, not connected to a link, but in Safari I saw the actually link.

Sometimes the amazon link will work and sometimes not

Think I go to Firefox


Title: Lively Case Discussion #561 12/16 - 12/18/2006
Post by: robots on December 16, 2006, 07:41:28 PM
Quote from: "cubbeegirl"
Quote from: "robots"
i think K2 are gonna sing sing sing

 8)



I think so too robots.... I hope so....



hope is good  8)


Title: Lively Case Discussion #561 12/16 - 12/18/2006
Post by: Altruist on December 16, 2006, 07:43:30 PM
OK, figured it out.

Klaas only has segment one through five of the Skeeters Tape transcript posted.   That's why the slut & rascist remarks are not there.

I will try to get the rest six through eleven & post it on that thread so we have it in total & don't have to waste scrux broadband for referencing purposes.


Title: Tapes
Post by: IBE on December 16, 2006, 07:57:09 PM
Thanks, would like to hear it in total.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #561 12/16 - 12/18/2006
Post by: Tylergal on December 16, 2006, 08:00:45 PM
Quote from: "cubbeegirl"
Tyler, that was so sweet..... :cry:

And, since you always know the answer to these questions I have an O/T question for you.....
We are going to Illinois for the holidays and my orange tree is loaded with yummy , juicy oranges and I would like to take some with me to share with my family as they so enjoy them. Do you have any suggestions as to the best way to handle them? TYIA


Oh, you are sweet.  Can you get some kind of bedding straw and put it in a big box, preferably something constructed of wood but if not heavy cardboard or even a cheap ice chest from a mart.  Then kind of snuggle the bedding straw in between them.  IT's just to prevent them from rubbing and bruising each other.

If that is not possible, try getting some absorbent white tissue paper like you put in gift bags just so they won't be rubbing against each other.

I wish I had a tree full of oranges.  :)  I bought a Meyer lemon this year and am praying that we do not get a hard freeze that kills it.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #561 12/16 - 12/18/2006
Post by: Lala'sMom on December 16, 2006, 08:01:54 PM
Joran 8/8:The suspect was shown/informed that he had stated that he and the girl went for a walk. And that there was a statement of someone that saw Deepak Kalpoe's car at a location that was several hundred yards away from the Fishermans hut.
He was asked about the logic of this and other issues and whether he can explain why he was there with the other boys in that particular location.
The suspect did not respond.


Does anyone know who this "someone" might be?  Have we ever discussed this before?


Title: Lively Case Discussion #561 12/16 - 12/18/2006
Post by: Lala'sMom on December 16, 2006, 08:03:09 PM
Quote from: "Altruist"
OK, figured it out.

Klaas only has segment one through five of the Skeeters Tape transcript posted.   That's why the slut & rascist remarks are not there.

I will try to get the rest six through eleven & post it on that thread so we have it in total & don't have to waste scrux broadband for referencing purposes.


Thanks.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #561 12/16 - 12/18/2006
Post by: Kat_Gram on December 16, 2006, 08:16:11 PM
Quote from: "Lala'sMom"
Joran 8/8:The suspect was shown/informed that he had stated that he and the girl went for a walk. And that there was a statement of someone that saw Deepak Kalpoe's car at a location that was several hundred yards away from the Fishermans hut.
He was asked about the logic of this and other issues and whether he can explain why he was there with the other boys in that particular location.
The suspect did not respond.


Does anyone know who this "someone" might be?  Have we ever discussed this before?

The Gardener.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #561 12/16 - 12/18/2006
Post by: sb on December 16, 2006, 08:22:03 PM
Hi Monkeys,

WELLLLLLLL, NOW... it appears that Diario agrees with me that the act of filing in California by the K2 means that they acknowledge jurisdiction of that State and make it a forum of record!

With apologies to thecuz, this act by Kock and his cronies is the legal equivalent of Reggie Fish's dropped punt into his own end zone.

And JQK is the Wondy Pierre-Louis of trans-national jurisprudence.  :wink: In the right place at the right time.

The Kalpoes just BLEW IT. Dumb and dumber!

I notice also that someone has mentioned that the FBI has analyzed the Skeeters hard drive and has announced findings that do not bode favorably for the premise of the K2s' dog-and-pony-show of a case.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #561 12/16 - 12/18/2006
Post by: cubbeegirl on December 16, 2006, 08:22:14 PM
Quote from: "Tylergal"
Quote from: "cubbeegirl"
Tyler, that was so sweet..... :cry:

And, since you always know the answer to these questions I have an O/T question for you.....
We are going to Illinois for the holidays and my orange tree is loaded with yummy , juicy oranges and I would like to take some with me to share with my family as they so enjoy them. Do you have any suggestions as to the best way to handle them? TYIA


Oh, you are sweet.  Can you get some kind of bedding straw and put it in a big box, preferably something constructed of wood but if not heavy cardboard or even a cheap ice chest from a mart.  Then kind of snuggle the bedding straw in between them.  IT's just to prevent them from rubbing and bruising each other.




If that is not possible, try getting some absorbent white tissue paper like you put in gift bags just so they won't be rubbing against each other.

I wish I had a tree full of oranges.  :)  I bought a Meyer lemon this year and am praying that we do not get a hard freeze that kills it.



Thanks tyler, I knew you would know what to do, I can get all of the above with no problem. I hope that your lemon tree makes it, I am thinking of getting one of those next. Funny thing about my orange tree is that a couple of years ago we had a hard freeze and I thought it was done for as it was still very young, but it just came back with a vengance and has done beautifully ever since. I think that cow manure my neighbor put around it really did the trick. Sounds yucky, but it works...


Title: Lively Case Discussion #561 12/16 - 12/18/2006
Post by: Ono on December 16, 2006, 08:23:25 PM
Quote from: "klaasend"
Brought over from the previous thread:

From Crazybabyborg:

Hey Monkeys!

Since I don't know your addresses, and communicate through the cage, I wanted to send you a Christmas Card. Lots of Love and wishes for a very Merry Christmas!

http://www.asilentnightmovie.com/


Thank you, CBB! Merry Christmas to you and yours, and a wonderful and happy 2007 as well ~ ! :D


Title: Lively Case Discussion #561 12/16 - 12/18/2006
Post by: Ono on December 16, 2006, 08:25:47 PM
Quote from: "mishy"
This from the Paramount statement in the last thread is very interesting, IMHO:

In a parting shot in its statement, Paramount says, "We also intend to discover who or what has motivated this lawsuit from the Kalpoe brothers, two of the primary suspects in Natalee’s disappearance and two of the last people seen driving away with her in their car."


Yes...I liked that very much as well. Go Paramount! :D


Title: Lively Case Discussion #561 12/16 - 12/18/2006
Post by: Ono on December 16, 2006, 08:29:59 PM
Quote from: "Kat_Gram"
From Dr. Phil's website :



From Dr. Phil’s Website: All new monday…. New developments in the Natalee Holloway case. Beth and I are back together again in the continued quest for justice for her daughter Natalee Holloway.


 :D Hot Damn, Dr. Phil! You've got my admiration!


Title: Lively Case Discussion #561 12/16 - 12/18/2006
Post by: sb on December 16, 2006, 08:30:35 PM
I also find that Paramount statement striking.

It shows again that this case has a very heavy "wedge" potential. I have little doubt that Paramount has ties to Aruba as an entertainment entity, and this case can't be too convenient for them. By them saying that, they acknowledge that their interest in protecting their creative human assets trumps the connections they may have. Interesting. We will see...


Title: Lively Case Discussion #561 12/16 - 12/18/2006
Post by: Ono on December 16, 2006, 08:34:08 PM
Quote from: "klaasend"
Just posted by MF at FOB.  This is the kind of BS you would expect from them.

Remember when Uncle Jossy said this on TV las night?:

Jossy: "Well they did confess it, we had the tape analyzed by some experts in Venezuela, it's a legitimate tape and they did admit to having sex but not only on the tape, they admitted to having sex with the girl when she was going in and out of consciousness in the car".

Well, the problem is, the Kalpoe Lawyers have the scientific evidence that the tape was manipulated and edited to show that they said "she did" instead of "no, she didn't" and "how simple it was" instead of "how simple it was that night" from the N.F.I. AND AN AMERICAN LAB IN CALIFORNIA.

The results were definite: the tapes were edited, not only for time lapse on the Drd. Phil show, but to change what the Kalpoe kid said!
___________

I think the Kalpoes and the posters at RU and FOB are in for a big surprise when it comes to the tape  :wink:


What makes these idiots tick?


Title: Lively Case Discussion #561 12/16 - 12/18/2006
Post by: Kat_Gram on December 16, 2006, 08:36:58 PM
I like Dr. Phil. But I never watch him. I am at work when he is in and it might be on later. I will have to look. If I have the TV on it is ususally CNN and I have seen nothing. Reading is just not the same.  

I did look around today and Deepak still has Visa problems.
His passport is still as a citizen of Surinam and if he is found guilty of anything, he goes back and can never have citizenship in Aruba.
His neck is in a noose.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #561 12/16 - 12/18/2006
Post by: sb on December 16, 2006, 08:37:28 PM
The Dutch said the tapes WERE edited, but NOT tampered with as to what they said factually. They have fudged that around to say that the tapes were itampered with. More "alternative reality" at work.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #561 12/16 - 12/18/2006
Post by: Ono on December 16, 2006, 08:38:34 PM
Quote from: "Altruist"
Hope that one of the First if not the FIRST deposition conducted will be that of van der Straaten on the pile of Bonaire.

Take that deposition first lawyers for DR PHIL, CBS, et al.

Someone needs to get on the record what evidence that van der straaten was referring to when he answered the question "what makes you believe that NH is deceased?" & he answered "because I have seen the evidence & you haven't".


Absolutely.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #561 12/16 - 12/18/2006
Post by: Lala'sMom on December 16, 2006, 08:41:26 PM
Quote from: "Kat_Gram"
Quote from: "Lala'sMom"
Joran 8/8:The suspect was shown/informed that he had stated that he and the girl went for a walk. And that there was a statement of someone that saw Deepak Kalpoe's car at a location that was several hundred yards away from the Fishermans hut.
He was asked about the logic of this and other issues and whether he can explain why he was there with the other boys in that particular location.
The suspect did not respond.


Does anyone know who this "someone" might be?  Have we ever discussed this before?

The Gardener.


I thought that was the pond area.  Is that the same thing?  I am getting forgetful lately.  :roll:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #561 12/16 - 12/18/2006
Post by: Ono on December 16, 2006, 08:42:27 PM
Quote from: "Kat_Gram"
From the Skeeters tape, Deepak has shown what a snivelling rat he is and if he thinks that he had been maligned, well too bad.
He is one of the three prime suspects to this day. He was the driver of the car. He was an adult ( well in years ). He took orders from Joran. He went along with the plan that they had acted out 20 x before. He could have delivered Natalee to the HI as she wanted. He could have stopped it. He could have let her out of the car safely. But he didn't and that shows me what he is made of. Rat Poop. And his brother Junior Rat Poop was also over the age of eighteen.
And now he wants a big pay day .


He's a scheming con-artist with an ego as big as Aruba, IMO.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #561 12/16 - 12/18/2006
Post by: sb on December 16, 2006, 08:44:17 PM
I didn't think of that Straten statement. I wonder if he can be deposed, and if his testimony can be admissible.

ALONG WITH THAT...

I am wondering if, even if evidence becomes a matter of public record under the LAWS of another country (USA), it STILL has to be disallowed under the Dutch "system". Remmeber that they say that if the evidence gets out, it can't be used in a Dutch proceeding. What if someone were compelled under the laws of SOME OTHER country to make it known in their judicial system's actions?


Title: Lively Case Discussion #561 12/16 - 12/18/2006
Post by: Ono on December 16, 2006, 08:44:24 PM
Quote from: "Altruist"
"how simple it was" instead of "how simple it was that night"

To me the 2 above statements are the same as Skeeters was only concerned with the night of 5/29-5/30.     Interesting that DK & his representatives think the words "that night" are so necessary.  Wonder why?  What was DK doing the night of 5/30-5/31 when his auto was seen at PVDS home early hours of 5/31 by the 2 sent there by Charles Croes?  Did PVDS have the 2 culprits leave when he got the phone call from ALE disclosing the soon to come arrival of Beth, Jug, et al along with 2 ALE.

Think Charles Croes should also be questioned as to what he believed to be the occurances that he referenced in his internet posting about what horribleness was going to be discovered to have taken place.  Greta "On the Record" has much on video with Charles Croes that was never aired.  Think it would be very good for her to turn it all over to JQK, don't you all?


Perhaps it has been already turned over to JQK. I am thinking so.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #561 12/16 - 12/18/2006
Post by: Tylergal on December 16, 2006, 08:47:06 PM
Quote from: "Lala'sMom"
Quote from: "Kat_Gram"
Quote from: "Lala'sMom"
Joran 8/8:The suspect was shown/informed that he had stated that he and the girl went for a walk. And that there was a statement of someone that saw Deepak Kalpoe's car at a location that was several hundred yards away from the Fishermans hut.
He was asked about the logic of this and other issues and whether he can explain why he was there with the other boys in that particular location.
The suspect did not respond.


Does anyone know who this "someone" might be?  Have we ever discussed this before?

The Gardener.


I thought that was the pond area.  Is that the same thing?  I am getting forgetful lately.  :roll:


I don't think we have ever discussed this, and I do not believe this is where the gardener said he saw them but I do not have a good recall for Aruba's geography only having been there twice and once was only 2 days on business, plus add that I have a spatial problem about N, E, S and W, and I don't know nothing.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #561 12/16 - 12/18/2006
Post by: Florida on December 16, 2006, 08:50:21 PM
Quote from: "Leslie"
MsMarple wrote:  A man has been accused of killing a 4-month old child, I think his own; "DNA" is mentioned in the article.
Quote:
Diabierna na corte a tuma lugar e caso den cual Ferdinand Alexander D. a wordo acusa di a mata Alexander D. E caso aki a impacta comunidad di Aruba, mirando cu e homber a wordo acusa di a mata su propio baby di 4 luna.
--
His name is Ferdinand Alexander Dijkhoff...sound familiar?


LESLIE:  I see what you mean....
Please ask Klaas for my email asddress
I have alot of "Dijkhoff" info
Thanks!


Title: Lively Case Discussion #561 12/16 - 12/18/2006
Post by: Altruist on December 16, 2006, 08:53:24 PM
Quote from: "sb"
I didn't think of that Straten statement. I wonder if he can be deposed, and if his testimony can be admissible.

ALONG WITH THAT...

I am wondering if, even if evidence becomes a matter of public record under the LAWS of another country (USA), it STILL has to be disallowed under the Dutch "system". Remmeber that they say that if the evidence gets out, it can't be used in a Dutch proceeding. What if someone were compelled under the laws of SOME OTHER country to make it known in their judicial system's actions?


It was my impression that as long as the information was not leaked by the "Prosecutor's Office" that it would not be in jeopardy, but this was during the time that lots of misinformation was being filtered around by persons who have since been discredited.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #561 12/16 - 12/18/2006
Post by: Ono on December 16, 2006, 08:53:35 PM
Quote from: "Tylergal"
Quote from: "AZLady"
Kat, it is possible that the only tape the Kalpoes and their attorneys have is the one that the Arubans tampered with and modified to reflect their own interpretation.  It might not be identical to the original tape the FBI holds.  If this is the case, Deepak and Satish have lied to their attorneys.  That won't be pretty.


I think most of us here will recall that the witch was with the ALE when they received it and were viewing it.  Perhaps, she was called to help them alter the tape.  She definitely told us she was there.  No way around that chit.


Oh, yeah, I remember reading that. She posted that she really had a "hands on" insider's position in that viewing...it made the reader wonder if the ALE was giving out tickets to the viewing via McDonald's Happy Meals. It was insane.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #561 12/16 - 12/18/2006
Post by: LilPuma on December 16, 2006, 08:54:20 PM
Quote from: "Tylergal"
CBB, thanks for the "Silent Night" movie.  I thoroughly enjoyed it.

Klaas, I hope your visit with the extended family was very nice.  

Just wanted everyone to know --- how much they are appreciated and each one adds something to the case for Natalee's justice, even though some are more silent and lurk, it is what is in each and every heart.  Not all of us are as eloquent as Anna and not all of us bring the daily news like Leslie, not all of us have the wherewithal to interpret the statements like CBB and not all have the analytical abilities of Lala's, but we all contribute in some way for "right," and when we are right, and we are tenacious, as this group  is, justice will come. . . . perhaps not on our time schedule but it will come.

At this time of year, I have to mention how this is a lot like prayer.  I often find myself "telling" the Lord how to solve my problems.  I know that is wrong and they are never solved in the way I thought they would be, but in a way I would have never thought of and we have to be patient because He knows best and He is in charge of Natalee's justice and we must pray that His will be done and that Natalee's family will have the answers.

I hope this is a blessed Christmas for each and everyone and that Christmas will bring us good news, but first I think we need to offer thanks to Him who hears us in our prayers, in our hearts, and thank Him for giving us Klaas, Red, Mrs. Red & Tom, for without them, we would all be scattered in the wilderness, seeking solace and a place to voice our hearts and our concerns and we need to ask His guidance that Beth & Dave and their families pursue a course that is pleasing in His eyes and that He will give them the strength to pursue this until justice prevails for their precious daughter.


Wise words.  {{{Tylergirl}}}


Title: Lively Case Discussion #561 12/16 - 12/18/2006
Post by: Florida on December 16, 2006, 08:57:31 PM
Quote from: "Lala'sMom"
Joran 8/8:The suspect was shown/informed that he had stated that he and the girl went for a walk. And that there was a statement of someone that saw Deepak Kalpoe's car at a location that was several hundred yards away from the Fishermans hut.
He was asked about the logic of this and other issues and whether he can explain why he was there with the other boys in that particular location.
The suspect did not respond.


Does anyone know who this "someone" might be?  Have we ever discussed this before?


Seems to me "several hundred yards away from the Fishermans hut" could be the drop off location near the Marriott.

On another point:
The racquet club witness is named CARLOS RAMOS
The Arashi beach witness/construction worker is CARLOS RAMOS

The rumor of 2 "surf shop" guys disappearing that Monday morning
...A CARLOS RAMOS works for the Pelican Watersports co.

Coincidence?


Title: Lively Case Discussion #561 12/16 - 12/18/2006
Post by: sb on December 16, 2006, 08:58:44 PM
Quote from: "Altruist"
Quote from: "sb"
I didn't think of that Straten statement. I wonder if he can be deposed, and if his testimony can be admissible.

ALONG WITH THAT...

I am wondering if, even if evidence becomes a matter of public record under the LAWS of another country (USA), it STILL has to be disallowed under the Dutch "system". Remmeber that they say that if the evidence gets out, it can't be used in a Dutch proceeding. What if someone were compelled under the laws of SOME OTHER country to make it known in their judicial system's actions?


It was my impression that as long as the information was not leaked by the "Prosecutor's Office" that it would not be in jeopardy, but this was during the time that lots of misinformation was being filtered around by persons who have since been discredited.


IF that is true, we can get every jot and tittle of evidence through discovery and it won't cost us the Dutch-Aruban cas either!

We could know the whole scenario from that night... and STILL be able to prosecute on Aruba's turf AS WELL AS our own. Nice.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #561 12/16 - 12/18/2006
Post by: Ono on December 16, 2006, 08:59:21 PM
Quote from: "Tylergal"
Quote from: "Anna"
Good Afternoon, Monkeys,

Very busy day here but a couple of things I want to remind us of:

Remember Justinsmama's thought that at some point when they
were corralling Natalee into the Pimpmobile, she got away from them and went back into C&C and back outside looking confused.  The MB student sitting on a balcony at nearby bar says it was Deepak who went in and drug her out by the arm, up the sidewalk and around the corner.

This he said before it came out that the Pimpmobile was parked in the back of C&C for privacy and rapid get away.

This is mentioned in the HT's filing and is NOT going to look too good for Deepak.  I used to doubt the kid seeing this when he first told it to Dan at RWV but now it makes perfect sense.  Joran let her get away and Deepak was having none of that and went in and drug her out by the arm.

Perhaps this did not happen but this MB kid is on the record saying he saw it right from the start and his testimony will certainly carry a tremendous weight with any jury.



.

(http://i15.photobucket.com/albums/a360/AnnaBlueSkies/Greetings/Holidays/thsanta.gif)

.


I recall that, Anna.  He stated Natalee went out, seemed to be looking for someone, then went back in and when she came out she was being led by Deepak to his car which had been moved to an area back and beyond C&C.  He was sitting on the balcony of ?Bahia? and had a good view.  He is the one who wished 1000 times he had stopped her.


Yes.. he was a sweet boy and I fear this will haunt him for a long time, and he thought that it would. He was the one who didn't know if she was calling out for help. I remember seeing him being interviewed. JK2, etc. have hurt a lot of people, and shame on them all.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #561 12/16 - 12/18/2006
Post by: Kat_Gram on December 16, 2006, 08:59:34 PM
The road by the pond where the gardener saw the car is just east of the huts. I was actually looking at T4N  recently and it was marked off on a map. Alot closer than what I had previously thought. That is one of the reasons why I currently think that the cell call was made from there and not the huts. The layout of the cell towers is North to South in that area and a call made from where the car was spotted from Joran's phone to the Kalpoe's in Hooiberg is a possibility.  
I also think and have though for a long time that if Deepak / Satish were to tell the truth it would come out that their involvement would result in charges. Don't know enough about Dutch law regarding what we would call " accessories " to a crime. But there has to a reason why they have not turned on the Sloots. They don't seem like the sort that would miss a chance to save their own butts, do they, the Kalpoe family ?
But this is all just speculation.
The response by Paramount will be delicious no doubt.
Lately, it seems as if the forces have gathered :
Jensen, DeVries, who ever the judge was that kept them as suspects,
Jossy and his tape, the lawsuit, Dr. Phil, Paramount.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #561 12/16 - 12/18/2006
Post by: LilPuma on December 16, 2006, 09:00:44 PM
Quote from: "Kat_Gram"
I like Dr. Phil. But I never watch him. I am at work when he is in and it might be on later. I will have to look. If I have the TV on it is ususally CNN and I have seen nothing. Reading is just not the same.  

I did look around today and Deepak still has Visa problems.
His passport is still as a citizen of Surinam and if he is found guilty of anything, he goes back and can never have citizenship in Aruba.
His neck is in a noose.


Dr. Phil is on here in the afternoon and replayed sometime after midnight.  It's like Oprah is on in the morning and replayed at 11:00 pm in my area.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #561 12/16 - 12/18/2006
Post by: Kat_Gram on December 16, 2006, 09:02:31 PM
Quote from: "Tylergal"
Quote from: "Lala'sMom"
Quote from: "Kat_Gram"
Quote from: "Lala'sMom"
Joran 8/8:The suspect was shown/informed that he had stated that he and the girl went for a walk. And that there was a statement of someone that saw Deepak Kalpoe's car at a location that was several hundred yards away from the Fishermans hut.
He was asked about the logic of this and other issues and whether he can explain why he was there with the other boys in that particular location.
The suspect did not respond.


Does anyone know who this "someone" might be?  Have we ever discussed this before?

The Gardener.


I thought that was the pond area.  Is that the same thing?  I am getting forgetful lately.  :roll:


I don't think we have ever discussed this, and I do not believe this is where the gardener said he saw them but I do not have a good recall for Aruba's geography only having been there twice and once was only 2 days on business, plus add that I have a spatial problem about N, E, S and W, and I don't know nothing.

Well, I am going to say then on a picture... up / down/left right. I have to think about directions too.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #561 12/16 - 12/18/2006
Post by: San on December 16, 2006, 09:05:16 PM
Quote from: "LilPuma"
Quote from: "Kat_Gram"
I like Dr. Phil. But I never watch him. I am at work when he is in and it might be on later. I will have to look. If I have the TV on it is ususally CNN and I have seen nothing. Reading is just not the same.  

I did look around today and Deepak still has Visa problems.
His passport is still as a citizen of Surinam and if he is found guilty of anything, he goes back and can never have citizenship in Aruba.
His neck is in a noose.


Dr. Phil is on here in the afternoon and replayed sometime after midnight.  It's like Oprah is on in the morning and replayed at 11:00 pm in my area.

It is the same way here too.  Dr. Phil comes on at 3:00 on CBS and then again at 5:00 on another cable channel (55 WLNY in NY).


Title: Lively Case Discussion #561 12/16 - 12/18/2006
Post by: Kat_Gram on December 16, 2006, 09:06:50 PM
Florida, you've been to Aruba, why are they so wierd about this case there ?
And
Didn't Jossy ( who I want to adopt me ) say that the tape he has with Dompig will be available to Dana and SM ?


Title: Lively Case Discussion #561 12/16 - 12/18/2006
Post by: Lala'sMom on December 16, 2006, 09:08:37 PM
I didn't get the idea that ALE was talking about the gardener, but then again I most likely am wrong.  It just jumped out at me when I read it.  If it isn't the gardener, then who is it?  I know, more questions.  Sorry.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #561 12/16 - 12/18/2006
Post by: LilPuma on December 16, 2006, 09:09:17 PM
Quote from: "Kat_Gram"
The road by the pond where the gardener saw the car is just east of the huts. I was actually looking at T4N  recently and it was marked off on a map. Alot closer than what I had previously thought. That is one of the reasons why I currently think that the cell call was made from there and not the huts. The layout of the cell towers is North to South in that area and a call made from where the car was spotted from Joran's phone to the Kalpoe's in Hooiberg is a possibility.  


I'm one of the few who always believed the gardener.  I don't even know why.  Deepak said he went home, got online and chatted with JCC.  He didn't chat constantly, but went to watch TV.  Why go into chat if you want to watch TV?  Because it wasn't Deepak, it was Satish.  He needed a reason he did not say much in chat.  If he had, Deepak's friend would have suspected it wasn't Deepak.  Remember also that Dr. Phil has a tape of Nadira saying she thinks her boys got home around 3:00 a.m.  (I used to go into a chat room regularly.  Many times we would log in with different screenames and others would try to guess who we were.  It rarely took long if the person was 'chatting'.)


Title: Lively Case Discussion #561 12/16 - 12/18/2006
Post by: sirensong on December 16, 2006, 09:14:29 PM
Quote from: crazybabyborg
Quote from: "Tylergal"


Just wanted everyone to know --- how much they are appreciated and each one adds something to the case for Natalee's justice, even though some are more silent and lurk, it is what is in each and every heart.  Not all of us are as eloquent as Anna and not all of us bring the daily news like Leslie, not all of us have the wherewithal to interpret the statements like CBB and not all have the analytical abilities of Lala's, but we all contribute in some way for "right," and when we are right, and we are tenacious, as this group  is, justice will come. . . . perhaps not on our time schedule but it will come.

At this time of year, I have to mention how this is a lot like prayer.  I often find myself "telling" the Lord how to solve my problems.  I know that is wrong and they are never solved in the way I thought they would be, but in a way I would have never thought of and we have to be patient because He knows best and He is in charge of Natalee's justice and we must pray that His will be done and that Natalee's family will have the answers.

I hope this is a blessed Christmas for each and everyone and that Christmas will bring us good news, but first I think we need to offer thanks to Him who hears us in our prayers, in our hearts, and thank Him for giving us Klaas, Red, Mrs. Red & Tom, for without them, we would all be scattered in the wilderness, seeking solace and a place to voice our hearts and our concerns and we need to ask His guidance that Beth & Dave and their families pursue a course that is pleasing in His eyes and that He will give them the strength to pursue this until justice prevails for their precious daughter.




 AMEN! Thank you Tylergal, for putting this so elequently. God Bless. The same sentiments are in my thoughts , and this prayer is  in my heart.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #561 12/16 - 12/18/2006
Post by: Ono on December 16, 2006, 09:16:42 PM
Quote from: "Tylergal"
CBB, thanks for the "Silent Night" movie.  I thoroughly enjoyed it.

Klaas, I hope your visit with the extended family was very nice.  

Just wanted everyone to know --- how much they are appreciated and each one adds something to the case for Natalee's justice, even though some are more silent and lurk, it is what is in each and every heart.  Not all of us are as eloquent as Anna and not all of us bring the daily news like Leslie, not all of us have the wherewithal to interpret the statements like CBB and not all have the analytical abilities of Lala's, but we all contribute in some way for "right," and when we are right, and we are tenacious, as this group  is, justice will come. . . . perhaps not on our time schedule but it will come.

At this time of year, I have to mention how this is a lot like prayer.  I often find myself "telling" the Lord how to solve my problems.  I know that is wrong and they are never solved in the way I thought they would be, but in a way I would have never thought of and we have to be patient because He knows best and He is in charge of Natalee's justice and we must pray that His will be done and that Natalee's family will have the answers.

I hope this is a blessed Christmas for each and everyone and that Christmas will bring us good news, but first I think we need to offer thanks to Him who hears us in our prayers, in our hearts, and thank Him for giving us Klaas, Red, Mrs. Red & Tom, for without them, we would all be scattered in the wilderness, seeking solace and a place to voice our hearts and our concerns and we need to ask His guidance that Beth & Dave and their families pursue a course that is pleasing in His eyes and that He will give them the strength to pursue this until justice prevails for their precious daughter.


Merry Christmas to you and yours, Tyler; I think it is He, who has called each and every one of us, (with our unique gifts & heritage), to gather together here regulary at Scared Monkeys for Natalee and for her family, to see this case through to a timely and just resolution.  Natalee needs us.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #561 12/16 - 12/18/2006
Post by: LilPuma on December 16, 2006, 09:17:40 PM
Quote from: "Anna"
Quote from: "Altruist"
Hope that one of the First if not the FIRST deposition conducted will be that of van der Straaten on the pile of Bonaire.

Take that deposition first lawyers for DR PHIL, CBS, et al.

Someone needs to get on the record what evidence that van der straaten was referring to when he answered the question "what makes you believe that NH is deceased?" & he answered "because I have seen the evidence & you haven't".


An excellent starting point, let's first establish why they all seem to think Natalee is dead and yet no one had one thing to do with it.




While CA and the US can't enforce a subpoena in Aruba, I'm assuming that if 2K are offering up affidavits of Arubans, there's something in the law that allows Defendants to depose or otherwise question them.  Anyone know?  Are they going to bring Arubans to CA to testify?  Do the Arubans have to submit to a deposition and questioning by the Defendants if their statements are being used by Plaintiffs?   :?:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #561 12/16 - 12/18/2006
Post by: Kat_Gram on December 16, 2006, 09:22:25 PM
Quote from: "LilPuma"
Quote from: "Kat_Gram"
The road by the pond where the gardener saw the car is just east of the huts. I was actually looking at T4N  recently and it was marked off on a map. Alot closer than what I had previously thought. That is one of the reasons why I currently think that the cell call was made from there and not the huts. The layout of the cell towers is North to South in that area and a call made from where the car was spotted from Joran's phone to the Kalpoe's in Hooiberg is a possibility.  


I'm one of the few who always believed the gardener.  I don't even know why.  Deepak said he went home, got online and chatted with JCC.  He didn't chat constantly, but went to watch TV.  Why go into chat if you want to watch TV?  Because it wasn't Deepak, it was Satish.  He needed a reason he did not say much in chat.  If he had, Deepak's friend would have suspected it wasn't Deepak.  Remember also that Dr. Phil has a tape of Nadira saying she thinks her boys got home around 3:00 a.m.  (I used to go into a chat room regularly.  Many times we would log in with different screenames and others would try to guess who we were.  It rarely took long if the person was 'chatting'.)

I think Satish bailed and went home very early. Hey, Just because it was Joran's phone, doesn't mean it was Joran who made the call. And then the thing about waiting UP for Joran. That is crazy. A brother would wait up for a brother but Joran could have found another means home. They have cabs. The people who have been to Aruba have walked from the Huts to the HI via the beach, past the Marriott and it isn't a great distance.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #561 12/16 - 12/18/2006
Post by: sb on December 16, 2006, 09:25:27 PM
Are we 100% SURE that the US can't enforce a subpoena in Aruba? I think they can compel a deposition in any country which has diplomatic relations with us.

And also, is it true that Deepak loses his Aruban visa for 5 years if he comes to the US? If that is so, WHY did they file that lawsuit, knowing almost certainly that at some point he would HAVE to come here to press the suit forward.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #561 12/16 - 12/18/2006
Post by: Kat_Gram on December 16, 2006, 09:26:42 PM
The blogs have kept this thing going to the point where some very professional persons who have the abilty to make something happen seem to be doing so. Since Aruba seems to want to just let it wither away.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #561 12/16 - 12/18/2006
Post by: Ono on December 16, 2006, 09:30:43 PM
Quote from: "Kat_Gram"
The road by the pond where the gardener saw the car is just east of the huts. I was actually looking at T4N  recently and it was marked off on a map. Alot closer than what I had previously thought. That is one of the reasons why I currently think that the cell call was made from there and not the huts. The layout of the cell towers is North to South in that area and a call made from where the car was spotted from Joran's phone to the Kalpoe's in Hooiberg is a possibility.  
I also think and have though for a long time that if Deepak / Satish were to tell the truth it would come out that their involvement would result in charges. Don't know enough about Dutch law regarding what we would call " accessories " to a crime. But there has to a reason why they have not turned on the Sloots. They don't seem like the sort that would miss a chance to save their own butts, do they, the Kalpoe family ?
But this is all just speculation.
The response by Paramount will be delicious no doubt.
Lately, it seems as if the forces have gathered :
Jensen, DeVries, who ever the judge was that kept them as suspects,
Jossy and his tape, the lawsuit, Dr. Phil, Paramount.


...........a gathering of eagles.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #561 12/16 - 12/18/2006
Post by: AZSunny on December 16, 2006, 09:37:40 PM
My thanks to CBB for that beautiful card and for the silent night link. It has placed me in the real Christmas spirit.  

Tyler- your warmth and love come through for everyone to see.  Thank you for who you are, and for what you share with all of us.  

Merry Christmas all.

Sunny


Title: Lively Case Discussion #561 12/16 - 12/18/2006
Post by: San on December 16, 2006, 09:40:05 PM
Quote from: "igsigs"
Coverage tonight on FOX...The Lineup / Guilfoyle 10pm EST

JUST A REMINDER


Title: Lively Case Discussion #561 12/16 - 12/18/2006
Post by: sb on December 16, 2006, 09:40:30 PM
There is a definite feeling that the good guys are mounting a comeback in this case.

I was extremely concerned, with the ny judge's ruling, that it would just have nowhere else to go for life. Every realistic avenue seemed like it was exhausted. There is looking like there is hope again now.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #561 12/16 - 12/18/2006
Post by: LilPuma on December 16, 2006, 09:40:57 PM
Quote from: "Anna"
.
Some were discussing the odd mindset in Aruba this morning and I will have to say I think this really plays into all of this.  It is the oddest I have ever encountered.

How on earth they think themselves the victims is just beyond me.  Natalee is missing and just about certainly dead, murdered in some way or other through drug OD or violence, we do not even know.

And yet, they are victims.  Something about the Dr. Phil show also really set them off.  They seem to think this entire country is tuned in daily awaiting our marching orders.  I like Dr. Phil but don't ever watch it as it falls at the wrong time of day for me.  I doubt I watch it twice a year.

And that is like their thinking Beth can magically make us boycott when I think we would be doing this with or without her blessing on it.

Not sure what you call that.  Maybe looking for a target to blame for their own failures or something like that but it is very strange.  Their reaction to things is just not normal.  Little things like saying Beth does not behave in the proper way for someone with a child missing.  HELLO!  There is no proper way!

Anita saying her own son is not safe for a girl to even get into a car with, all of it is just mind boggling.  Their minds are warped and badly.



One of the partners at Cremer Kopon deals with negotiations with international clients.  I posted his comments on a book on the subject of cross-cultural mediation on the last thread.  I'd guess this firm is trying to bridge that gap.  Telling Kock what will or won't fly in the US.  Wording documents not only to conform to our law, but to play to a jury and the media, since public opinion is what this case is about.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #561 12/16 - 12/18/2006
Post by: Kat_Gram on December 16, 2006, 09:42:59 PM
There were visa problems. But does he need a visa for just a visit ?
Think the five years was in regards to Deepak coming to the USA to go to school for an extended period. That would be an Aruban thing, the length of time you are allowed to be away without it counting as an absence in the time period used to count residency.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #561 12/16 - 12/18/2006
Post by: LilPuma on December 16, 2006, 09:44:15 PM
Quote from: "San"
Quote from: "igsigs"
Coverage tonight on FOX...The Lineup / Guilfoyle 10pm EST

JUST A REMINDER


And the Bulls beat the Hawks in an overtime thrillah just in time for me to watch!   :)


Title: Lively Case Discussion #561 12/16 - 12/18/2006
Post by: San on December 16, 2006, 09:45:05 PM
Quote from: "LilPuma"
Quote from: "San"
Quote from: "igsigs"
Coverage tonight on FOX...The Lineup / Guilfoyle 10pm EST

JUST A REMINDER


And the Bulls beat the Hawks in an overtime thrillah just in time for me to watch!   :)

 :lol:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #561 12/16 - 12/18/2006
Post by: crazybabyborg on December 16, 2006, 09:45:24 PM
Quote from: "AZSunny"
My thanks to CBB for that beautiful card and for the silent night link. It has placed me in the real Christmas spirit.  

Tyler- your warmth and love come through for everyone to see.  Thank you for who you are, and for what you share with all of us.  

Merry Christmas all.

Sunny


Your most welcome, AZ!  :wink:

Kimberly coming on soon, right??


Title: Lively Case Discussion #561 12/16 - 12/18/2006
Post by: LilPuma on December 16, 2006, 09:47:11 PM
Quote from: "Kat_Gram"
There were visa problems. But does he need a visa for just a visit ?
Think the five years was in regards to Deepak coming to the USA to go to school for an extended period. That would be an Aruban thing, the length of time you are allowed to be away without it counting as an absence in the time period used to count residency.


 :idea: Speaking of Deepak coming to the US, one of the things Greta's legal expert said with regard to jurisdiction is that while the "related case" may not get JQK's suit into the system, they could wait until the Kalpoes come to CA and serve them then.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #561 12/16 - 12/18/2006
Post by: sb on December 16, 2006, 09:48:15 PM
I have long believed that the people behind all this are old-guard veterans in the fields of entertainment and mass media. They KNOW public relations and marketing and they know how to influence and mold minds.

Aruba was always a difficult "sell", but at some point in the 80's, it blossomed. Someone "reinvented" the place in the eyes of the public and found a way to market it and get people to want to go there. It went from desert speck in the ocean to a playground of the Caribbean almost overnight.

The Arubans LIVE by media, marketing, PR, "spin", so forth.

Such people also tend to be consummate LIARS... at best, they can generously be said to be "creative" with the truth.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #561 12/16 - 12/18/2006
Post by: Kat_Gram on December 16, 2006, 09:49:43 PM
Well, I think Deepak got screwed over by the Sloots. But I have no sympathy for him as he displays no manly characteristics. He also appears too nerdy for a jury to identify with. Can't see him making any friends in the USA in a court room or otherwise.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #561 12/16 - 12/18/2006
Post by: LilPuma on December 16, 2006, 09:50:09 PM
Quote from: "sb"
There is a definite feeling that the good guys are mounting a comeback in this case.

I was extremely concerned, with the ny judge's ruling, that it would just have nowhere else to go for life. Every realistic avenue seemed like it was exhausted. There is looking like there is hope again now.


With Jensen and DeVries getting more information out there, there's even the possibility that they could look to the Netherlands if all else failed.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #561 12/16 - 12/18/2006
Post by: sb on December 16, 2006, 09:51:02 PM
BTW, Kat_Gram, thanks for the info about the 5-year thing. That would not stop Deepak from coming here.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #561 12/16 - 12/18/2006
Post by: San on December 16, 2006, 09:54:32 PM
Welcome back Klaas.  Just in time for The Line up.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #561 12/16 - 12/18/2006
Post by: LilPuma on December 16, 2006, 09:55:14 PM
Quote from: "Kat_Gram"
Well, I think Deepak got screwed over by the Sloots. But I have no sympathy for him as he displays no manly characteristics. He also appears too nerdy for a jury to identify with. Can't see him making any friends in the USA in a court room or otherwise.


Yea, but jury's always feel sorry for the little guy getting screwed by the rich and powerful.  That's why things like the "slut" portions of the tape are important.  Also, Deepak lying, even when the guards were arrested.  Deepak telling JCCroes he had sexual contact with Natalee and then saying it was to mislead authorities, talking to Skeeters about making money off of this in AUGUST OF 2005!  These are all things that will make him look bad.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #561 12/16 - 12/18/2006
Post by: Kat_Gram on December 16, 2006, 09:59:08 PM
In Aruba, I don't know if they have to keep extending their visas but you never want to be out of country when thing lapses either. That might be why he didn't come here before. Can't apply for a continuation if you are not there.
Does anyone know how much Fox paid Joran for the fluffy thing with Greta ?
As for lawyers on these shows, ask 10 of them the same question, get 10 answers that are different.
Solution : Never ask a lawyer a question.
Deepak also broke the rule that if someone offers you $$$$$$$ cash for something, you take it.  Even more so if what you have to offer has a shelf life. He wanted more than 4 million for his story, give me a break.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #561 12/16 - 12/18/2006
Post by: klaasend on December 16, 2006, 09:59:50 PM
Quote from: "Altruist"
OK, figured it out.

Klaas only has segment one through five of the Skeeters Tape transcript posted.   That's why the slut & rascist remarks are not there.

I will try to get the rest six through eleven & post it on that thread so we have it in total & don't have to waste scrux broadband for referencing purposes.

I'm way behind but I copied all of them.  Wonder what happened?  I did copy and paste it fairly quickly though  :wink:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #561 12/16 - 12/18/2006
Post by: LilPuma on December 16, 2006, 10:02:34 PM
Quote from: "sb"
Are we 100% SURE that the US can't enforce a subpoena in Aruba? I think they can compel a deposition in any country which has diplomatic relations with us.



Not sure, but I can't imagine the Plaintiffs can enter affidavits or statements without the Defendants getting a crack at them.  I'm wondering about Skeeters recording Deepak and Deepak not consenting to the use of the tape on TV.  Is it illegal in Aruba to tape someone without their knowledge?  Is it illegal to use that tape on TV when that person is a suspect in a murder investigation?  Does a P.I. have an obligation to be honest with someone he's interviewing, especially if that person is a suspect?  I keep thinking of that promo from the TV show "Shark" - It's not about the law, it's about what 12 people think is right.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #561 12/16 - 12/18/2006
Post by: Kat_Gram on December 16, 2006, 10:03:17 PM
Quote from: "LilPuma"
Quote from: "Kat_Gram"
Well, I think Deepak got screwed over by the Sloots. But I have no sympathy for him as he displays no manly characteristics. He also appears too nerdy for a jury to identify with. Can't see him making any friends in the USA in a court room or otherwise.


Yea, but jury's always feel sorry for the little guy getting screwed by the rich and powerful.  That's why things like the "slut" portions of the tape are important.  Also, Deepak lying, even when the guards were arrested.  Deepak telling JCCroes he had sexual contact with Natalee and then saying it was to mislead authorities, talking to Skeeters about making money off of this in AUGUST OF 2005!  These are all things that will make him look bad.

I agree. He is the little guy, but he is still a rat. If he had been punished for his role in this while Joran laffed it up as he tends to do, he might be a more sympathetic persona. But in my mind, he is just as guilty as Joran. And worse in a way becasue he could have prevented it and Natalee would not be gone.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #561 12/16 - 12/18/2006
Post by: Florida on December 16, 2006, 10:03:20 PM
Quote from: "Kat_Gram"
Florida, you've been to Aruba, why are they so wierd about this case there ?


Not sure what you mean exactly...
IMO...The native Aruban people are wonderful people that turned their island over to Dutch and "Americans in Aruba" with big bucks. Along with this came the corruption, sex, drugs and whatever. It's my opinion that it is "bigger than Joran"...The reason for the cover-up. For the truth to be brought forward, the island would probably not survive...or not as it has. The Arubans are very fearful people.

Recently, Aruba proposed a new 12% sales tax...The Arubans feel it will really hit their pockets. Are they now having to pay for "Joran's investigation"?


Title: Lively Case Discussion #561 12/16 - 12/18/2006
Post by: Kat_Gram on December 16, 2006, 10:06:16 PM
I am not even sure what I meant. It's like they are siding with the criminals.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #561 12/16 - 12/18/2006
Post by: LilPuma on December 16, 2006, 10:08:30 PM
Quote from: "Kat_Gram"
In Aruba, I don't know if they have to keep extending their visas but you never want to be out of country when thing lapses either. That might be why he didn't come here before. Can't apply for a continuation if you are not there.
Does anyone know how much Fox paid Joran for the fluffy thing with Greta ?
As for lawyers on these shows, ask 10 of them the same question, get 10 answers that are different.
Solution : Never ask a lawyer a question.
Deepak also broke the rule that if someone offers you $$$$$$$ cash for something, you take it.  Even more so if what you have to offer has a shelf life. He wanted more than 4 million for his story, give me a break.


While Deepak hasn't been convicted of a crime and also isn't subject to the U.S. law of someone not profiting from their crime, if Dr. Phil can establish that there's reasonable suspicion that this guy was involved and he's getting away with it because of corruption in Aruba, he'll get creamed by a jury for wanting to profit from it - claiming in August '05 that he wanted money for his story !  Book deals, movies, blah blah blah.  Meanwhile, he's still a suspect and even if he gets off in Aruba, there is plenty of evidence to show what a low life this guy is - Dr. Phil's people just have to get in into the courtroom for the jury to see.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #561 12/16 - 12/18/2006
Post by: Carnut on December 16, 2006, 10:10:54 PM
Quote from: "Kat_Gram"
I am not even sure what I meant. It's like they are siding with the criminals.


Well, they sure haven't done much to show they are siding with the victim.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #561 12/16 - 12/18/2006
Post by: AZSunny on December 16, 2006, 10:12:28 PM
Quote from: "Kat_Gram"
In Aruba, I don't know if they have to keep extending their visas but you never want to be out of country when thing lapses either. That might be why he didn't come here before. Can't apply for a continuation if you are not there.
Does anyone know how much Fox paid Joran for the fluffy thing with Greta ?
As for lawyers on these shows, ask 10 of them the same question, get 10 answers that are different.
Solution : Never ask a lawyer a question.
Deepak also broke the rule that if someone offers you $$$$$$$ cash for something, you take it.  Even more so if what you have to offer has a shelf life. He wanted more than 4 million for his story, give me a break.


Greta said that they did not pay Joran for the interview.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #561 12/16 - 12/18/2006
Post by: LilPuma on December 16, 2006, 10:13:06 PM
Quote from: "Florida"
Quote from: "Kat_Gram"
Florida, you've been to Aruba, why are they so wierd about this case there ?


Not sure what you mean exactly...
IMO...The native Aruban people are wonderful people that turned their island over to Dutch and "Americans in Aruba" with big bucks. Along with this came the corruption, sex, drugs and whatever. It's my opinion that it is "bigger than Joran"...The reason for the cover-up. For the truth to be brought forward, the island would probably not survive...or not as it has. The Arubans are very fearful people.

Recently, Aruba proposed a new 12% sales tax...The Arubans feel it will really hit their pockets. Are they now having to pay for "Joran's investigation"?


And I think Jossy is trying to fight the Dutch and Americans-with-big-bucks who are taking care of their own at the expense of the Arubans.  He's one of the few who have the resources - money and a powerful family - to wage this battle.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #561 12/16 - 12/18/2006
Post by: Carnut on December 16, 2006, 10:17:14 PM
Quote from: "AZSunny"
Quote from: "Kat_Gram"
In Aruba, I don't know if they have to keep extending their visas but you never want to be out of country when thing lapses either. That might be why he didn't come here before. Can't apply for a continuation if you are not there.
Does anyone know how much Fox paid Joran for the fluffy thing with Greta ?
As for lawyers on these shows, ask 10 of them the same question, get 10 answers that are different.
Solution : Never ask a lawyer a question.
Deepak also broke the rule that if someone offers you $$$$$$$ cash for something, you take it.  Even more so if what you have to offer has a shelf life. He wanted more than 4 million for his story, give me a break.


Greta said that they did not pay Joran for the interview.


Yeah, it almost looked like it was the other way around.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #561 12/16 - 12/18/2006
Post by: Florida on December 16, 2006, 10:19:34 PM
Quote from: "Kat_Gram"
I am not even sure what I meant. It's like they are siding with the criminals.


I see it as:  The Dutch "powers" in Aruba (Political & Investors)
& the "American's in Aruba" (Media &Investors) are siding with Joran.
Joran is definitely responsible...but, to me it looks like there may be more people involved. The reason for the widespread cover-up & certain people leaving Aruba abruptly.  
The Kalpoe's were meant to be scapegoats.

There is a "brotherhood" among the men in Aruba...Not sure what it is exactly...It's as though they made sure all the powerful men were included in the disappearance of Natalee....Not sure the Kalpoes knew what they were getting themserlves into.....JMO.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #561 12/16 - 12/18/2006
Post by: Kat_Gram on December 16, 2006, 10:20:18 PM
Carnut  you are funny, but I can see what you mean.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #561 12/16 - 12/18/2006
Post by: LilPuma on December 16, 2006, 10:21:41 PM
The site meter says 2% Netherlands.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #561 12/16 - 12/18/2006
Post by: Kat_Gram on December 16, 2006, 10:22:49 PM
Well Hello Holland !


Title: Lively Case Discussion #561 12/16 - 12/18/2006
Post by: klaasend on December 16, 2006, 10:26:01 PM
Whew, done catching up just waiting now for the Lineup.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #561 12/16 - 12/18/2006
Post by: Kat_Gram on December 16, 2006, 10:29:16 PM
Did you have a nice time Klaasend ? Miss us ?
You need more breaks.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #561 12/16 - 12/18/2006
Post by: klaasend on December 16, 2006, 10:29:45 PM
Coverage on the LINEUP coming up after the commercial break.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #561 12/16 - 12/18/2006
Post by: klaasend on December 16, 2006, 10:31:06 PM
Quote from: "Kat_Gram"
Did you have a nice time Klaasend ? Miss us ?
You need more breaks.

Yes, had a great time and I'm stuffed!  Yes, I missed you guys too.  Almost took at laptop with me but figured my husband wouldn't approve, lol. :lol:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #561 12/16 - 12/18/2006
Post by: Florida on December 16, 2006, 10:31:53 PM
ARUBA:

"The Inmates are Running the Asylum"


Title: Lively Case Discussion #561 12/16 - 12/18/2006
Post by: crazybabyborg on December 16, 2006, 10:33:26 PM
FORMER suspects?   I don't think so!


Title: Lively Case Discussion #561 12/16 - 12/18/2006
Post by: LilPuma on December 16, 2006, 10:33:57 PM
Quote from: "Florida"
ARUBA:

"The Inmates are Running the Asylum"


Their new motto!


Title: Lively Case Discussion #561 12/16 - 12/18/2006
Post by: San on December 16, 2006, 10:34:39 PM
Georgia Goslee thinks they don't have a chance against Dr. Phil.  She thinks Dr. Phil has a high level of intergrity to do something like that.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #561 12/16 - 12/18/2006
Post by: crazybabyborg on December 16, 2006, 10:35:00 PM
AHHHHH! Tacky heard the cage crack up about his "hysterics!"  :lol:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #561 12/16 - 12/18/2006
Post by: Elaine on December 16, 2006, 10:35:24 PM
Hi Monkeys! Lineup on here too. Greasy Joey on phone...


Title: Lively Case Discussion #561 12/16 - 12/18/2006
Post by: crazybabyborg on December 16, 2006, 10:36:21 PM
hmmmmmmmmmmm, Tacky's attitude is interesting.......


Title: Lively Case Discussion #561 12/16 - 12/18/2006
Post by: crazybabyborg on December 16, 2006, 10:37:27 PM
Tacky's prediction: K2s will walk away from the Dr. Phil suit and will never be deposed.

I DOUBT THAT!

Is there "discovery" in a civil case?


Title: Lively Case Discussion #561 12/16 - 12/18/2006
Post by: Elaine on December 16, 2006, 10:38:02 PM
Quote from: "crazybabyborg"
hmmmmmmmmmmm, Tacky's attitude is interesting.......
He is so annoying!!!


Title: Lively Case Discussion #561 12/16 - 12/18/2006
Post by: klaasend on December 16, 2006, 10:38:07 PM
Quote from: "crazybabyborg"
hmmmmmmmmmmm, Tacky's attitude is interesting.......

Sure, he'd love to see the Kalpoes take all the blame.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #561 12/16 - 12/18/2006
Post by: San on December 16, 2006, 10:38:07 PM
Joe Tacopina aid in Joran's lawsuit didn't claim Joran caused the death of Natalee and the Kalpoes lawsuit does.

Joe Tacopina said Dr. Phils tape was in fact doctored.

He said the Kalpoes will probably walk away from the lawsuit and they will never get deposed in the United States.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #561 12/16 - 12/18/2006
Post by: klaasend on December 16, 2006, 10:39:14 PM
Quote from: "San"
Joe Tacopina aid in Joran's lawsuit didn't claim Joran caused the death of Natalee and the Kalpoes lawsuit does.

Joe Tacopina said Dr. Phils tape was in fact doctored.

He said the Kalpoes will probably walk away from the lawsuit and they will never get deposed in the United States.

I wonder how many people will need to run out and buy "depends" when they find out the tape was NOT doctored?


Title: Lively Case Discussion #561 12/16 - 12/18/2006
Post by: crazybabyborg on December 16, 2006, 10:40:35 PM
Quote from: "klaasend"
Quote from: "crazybabyborg"
hmmmmmmmmmmm, Tacky's attitude is interesting.......

Sure, he'd love to see the Kalpoes take all the blame.


Yeah, Joran seemed to want that as well in the Greta interview. I was curious as to whether he might be concerned that K2s would point to Joran if deposed.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #561 12/16 - 12/18/2006
Post by: Elaine on December 16, 2006, 10:40:47 PM
Quote from: "klaasend"
Quote from: "San"
Joe Tacopina aid in Joran's lawsuit didn't claim Joran caused the death of Natalee and the Kalpoes lawsuit does.

Joe Tacopina said Dr. Phils tape was in fact doctored.

He said the Kalpoes will probably walk away from the lawsuit and they will never get deposed in the United States.

I wonder how many people will need to run out and buy "depends" when they find out the tape was NOT doctored?
ROFLMAO :lol:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #561 12/16 - 12/18/2006
Post by: San on December 16, 2006, 10:41:17 PM
Quote from: "klaasend"
Quote from: "San"
Joe Tacopina aid in Joran's lawsuit didn't claim Joran caused the death of Natalee and the Kalpoes lawsuit does.

Joe Tacopina said Dr. Phils tape was in fact doctored.

He said the Kalpoes will probably walk away from the lawsuit and they will never get deposed in the United States.

I wonder how many people will need to run out and buy "depends" when they find out the tape was NOT doctored?

I have the feeling that even if the FBI said it was not altered Joe Tacopina will say they are lying.

Everyone lies except Joran.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #561 12/16 - 12/18/2006
Post by: San on December 16, 2006, 10:42:38 PM
Quote from: "crazybabyborg"
Quote from: "klaasend"
Quote from: "crazybabyborg"
hmmmmmmmmmmm, Tacky's attitude is interesting.......

Sure, he'd love to see the Kalpoes take all the blame.


Yeah, Joran seemed to want that as well in the Greta interview. I was curious as to whether he might be concerned that K2s would point to Joran if deposed.

I can hear Joe Tacopina on the phone right now telling people in Aruba I don't care how you make it happen make sure they drop the charges.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #561 12/16 - 12/18/2006
Post by: Elaine on December 16, 2006, 10:43:39 PM
I don't understand why Joey T. was even on tonight, he is not involved in this case (The kalpoe lawsuit). They just needed someone to fill in the time gap, and they dug in the bottom of the barrel for Joey :lol:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #561 12/16 - 12/18/2006
Post by: LilPuma on December 16, 2006, 10:44:57 PM
Quote from: "klaasend"
Quote from: "San"
Joe Tacopina aid in Joran's lawsuit didn't claim Joran caused the death of Natalee and the Kalpoes lawsuit does.

Joe Tacopina said Dr. Phils tape was in fact doctored.

He said the Kalpoes will probably walk away from the lawsuit and they will never get deposed in the United States.

I wonder how many people will need to run out and buy "depends" when they find out the tape was NOT doctored?


Deepak knows the Dr. Phil's tape is legit.  Whatever happened to that tape, I think that Tacopina, Kock, and many others actually believe it was doctored.  There are going to be some people angry with Deepak.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #561 12/16 - 12/18/2006
Post by: crazybabyborg on December 16, 2006, 10:46:29 PM
Quote from: "Elaine"
I don't understand why Joey T. was even on tonight, he is not involved in this case (The kalpoe lawsuit). They just needed someone to fill in the time gap, and they dug in the bottom of the barrel for Joey :lol:


I had the feeling he was TRYING to come off as only passively interested. You know, "Doesn't have anything to do with me or Joran, but here's my opinion, since you asked."


Title: Lively Case Discussion #561 12/16 - 12/18/2006
Post by: Elaine on December 16, 2006, 10:48:10 PM
Quote from: "crazybabyborg"
Quote from: "Elaine"
I don't understand why Joey T. was even on tonight, he is not involved in this case (The kalpoe lawsuit). They just needed someone to fill in the time gap, and they dug in the bottom of the barrel for Joey :lol:


I had the feeling he was TRYING to come off as only passively interested. You know, "Doesn't have anything to do with me or Joran, but here's my opinion, since you asked."
Yes, if I heard him correctly, he said "Joran and  I were not invited to this dance"....did anyone else hear it that way?


Title: Lively Case Discussion #561 12/16 - 12/18/2006
Post by: igsigs on December 16, 2006, 10:48:43 PM
Quote from: "crazybabyborg"
Tacky's prediction: K2s will walk away from the Dr. Phil suit and will never be deposed.

He wishes. Kalpoes under oath is dangerous for the Sloots.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #561 12/16 - 12/18/2006
Post by: LilPuma on December 16, 2006, 10:48:56 PM
:lol:  :lol: I just e-mailed Kimberly with comments about the show.  I also said that I usually cringe when Tacopina comes on because I want to throw things at him but my TV is in the way.  I added that he was rather well behaved tonight, but wrong about the tapes (IMO).


Title: Lively Case Discussion #561 12/16 - 12/18/2006
Post by: crazybabyborg on December 16, 2006, 10:49:07 PM
Quote from: "LilPuma"
Quote from: "klaasend"
Quote from: "San"
Joe Tacopina aid in Joran's lawsuit didn't claim Joran caused the death of Natalee and the Kalpoes lawsuit does.

Joe Tacopina said Dr. Phils tape was in fact doctored.

He said the Kalpoes will probably walk away from the lawsuit and they will never get deposed in the United States.

I wonder how many people will need to run out and buy "depends" when they find out the tape was NOT doctored?


Deepak knows the Dr. Phil's tape is legit.  Whatever happened to that tape, I think that Tacopina, Kock, and many others actually believe it was doctored.  There are going to be some people angry with Deepak.


I think you're right. I think you're absolutely right! Kock doesn't strike me as a wild cannon, and I think he actually believes the tape has been altered. Here's the thing: didn't they send the tape to Holland to be authenticated? The word must have come back saying it had been manipulated. Marco?


Title: Lively Case Discussion #561 12/16 - 12/18/2006
Post by: 2NJSons_Mom on December 16, 2006, 10:51:15 PM
Quote from: "crazybabyborg"
FORMER suspects?   I don't think so!


Yes, caught that...my radar went up at that point...


Title: Lively Case Discussion #561 12/16 - 12/18/2006
Post by: klaasend on December 16, 2006, 10:51:44 PM
Quote from: "crazybabyborg"
Quote from: "LilPuma"
Quote from: "klaasend"
Quote from: "San"
Joe Tacopina aid in Joran's lawsuit didn't claim Joran caused the death of Natalee and the Kalpoes lawsuit does.

Joe Tacopina said Dr. Phils tape was in fact doctored.

He said the Kalpoes will probably walk away from the lawsuit and they will never get deposed in the United States.

I wonder how many people will need to run out and buy "depends" when they find out the tape was NOT doctored?


Deepak knows the Dr. Phil's tape is legit.  Whatever happened to that tape, I think that Tacopina, Kock, and many others actually believe it was doctored.  There are going to be some people angry with Deepak.


I think you're right. I think you're absolutely right! Kock doesn't strike me as a wild cannon, and I think he actually believes the tape has been altered. Here's the thing: didn't they send the tape to Holland to be authenticated? The word must have come back saying it had been manipulated. Marco?


What NFI said was very vague.  All they said is that the tape on the Dr. Phil show was manipulated/edited.  The original tape was not tampered with.  They did not come out and say that Deepak said Didn't instead of Did.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #561 12/16 - 12/18/2006
Post by: crazybabyborg on December 16, 2006, 10:53:19 PM
Quote from: "igsigs"
Quote from: "crazybabyborg"
Tacky's prediction: K2s will walk away from the Dr. Phil suit and will never be deposed.

He wishes. Kalpoes under oath is dangerous for the Sloots.


Kalpoes under skillful questioning could very well seal all 3 amigoes fate, and maybe some others as well.
I would assume that anything said from K2s under oath could be used in the criminal case, and slip ups in deposition is the biggest threat to this standstill. My money is on Satish being the weakest link.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #561 12/16 - 12/18/2006
Post by: Florida on December 16, 2006, 10:53:20 PM
In reference to Dompig's statement that the Kalpoe's "put themselves at the salt pan"...I understand there are a few...One near Tierra del Sol Golf Course & one in front of the pond at the Racquet Club.

(http://i20.photobucket.com/albums/b223/NYSusan/Picture017.jpg)(http://i20.photobucket.com/albums/b223/NYSusan/SkyDiveAruba-BambooHut.jpg)(http://i20.photobucket.com/albums/b223/NYSusan/AcrossfromtheRclub.jpg)

Out house?....................Sky Dive Aruba hut....................Salt pan

This area is east of the main road 1A and the service road that runs along the beach/Fisherman's huts.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #561 12/16 - 12/18/2006
Post by: justinsmama on December 16, 2006, 10:53:37 PM
Quote from: "San"
Quote from: "klaasend"
Quote from: "San"
Joe Tacopina aid in Joran's lawsuit didn't claim Joran caused the death of Natalee and the Kalpoes lawsuit does.

Joe Tacopina said Dr. Phils tape was in fact doctored.

He said the Kalpoes will probably walk away from the lawsuit and they will never get deposed in the United States.

I wonder how many people will need to run out and buy "depends" when they find out the tape was NOT doctored?

I have the feeling that even if the FBI said it was not altered Joe Tacopina will say they are lying.

Everyone lies except Joran.


He (Joe T.) needs to take care in who he slanders.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #561 12/16 - 12/18/2006
Post by: crazybabyborg on December 16, 2006, 10:55:04 PM
Quote from: "klaasend"
Quote from: "crazybabyborg"
Quote from: "LilPuma"
Quote from: "klaasend"
Quote from: "San"
Joe Tacopina aid in Joran's lawsuit didn't claim Joran caused the death of Natalee and the Kalpoes lawsuit does.

Joe Tacopina said Dr. Phils tape was in fact doctored.

He said the Kalpoes will probably walk away from the lawsuit and they will never get deposed in the United States.

I wonder how many people will need to run out and buy "depends" when they find out the tape was NOT doctored?


Deepak knows the Dr. Phil's tape is legit.  Whatever happened to that tape, I think that Tacopina, Kock, and many others actually believe it was doctored.  There are going to be some people angry with Deepak.


I think you're right. I think you're absolutely right! Kock doesn't strike me as a wild cannon, and I think he actually believes the tape has been altered. Here's the thing: didn't they send the tape to Holland to be authenticated? The word must have come back saying it had been manipulated. Marco?


What NFI said was very vague.  All they said is that the tape on the Dr. Phil show was manipulated/edited.  The original tape was not tampered with.  They did not come out and say that Deepak said Didn't instead of Did.


Thanks, Klaas. That's a crucial bit of information.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #561 12/16 - 12/18/2006
Post by: Kat_Gram on December 16, 2006, 10:57:48 PM
Joe T is looking at the ten million on the fishing line.
.......
Who cares what Joe says or thinks ? He is a Sloot lawyer.
And that is a BAAAAAD thing.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #561 12/16 - 12/18/2006
Post by: IndyDan on December 16, 2006, 10:57:50 PM
Hey Kim, catch up.  The Kalpoes aren't FORMER suspects, they are STILL suspects.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #561 12/16 - 12/18/2006
Post by: justinsmama on December 16, 2006, 10:59:59 PM
NFI reported that the audio and video were not in sync, that is all.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #561 12/16 - 12/18/2006
Post by: Kat_Gram on December 16, 2006, 11:00:09 PM
Them not being released as suspects is a bigger thing in the big picture with the Phil lawsuit / countersuit looming.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #561 12/16 - 12/18/2006
Post by: LilPuma on December 16, 2006, 11:00:19 PM
Quote from: "klaasend"

What NFI said was very vague.  All they said is that the tape on the Dr. Phil show was manipulated/edited.  The original tape was not tampered with.  They did not come out and say that Deepak said Didn't instead of Did.


Thanks, Klaas.  I didn't want to believe that NFI was "compromised".  I need to believe that there are places where dishonesty and corruption are simply not tolerated.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #561 12/16 - 12/18/2006
Post by: igsigs on December 16, 2006, 11:00:54 PM
NFI Report

To the best of my knowledge has never been released...or officially quoted. Dompig and Schippers both referenced the report as saying *manipulated*. That's it.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #561 12/16 - 12/18/2006
Post by: justinsmama on December 16, 2006, 11:02:08 PM
Quote from: "Elaine"
Quote from: "crazybabyborg"
Quote from: "Elaine"
I don't understand why Joey T. was even on tonight, he is not involved in this case (The kalpoe lawsuit). They just needed someone to fill in the time gap, and they dug in the bottom of the barrel for Joey :lol:


I had the feeling he was TRYING to come off as only passively interested. You know, "Doesn't have anything to do with me or Joran, but here's my opinion, since you asked."
Yes, if I heard him correctly, he said "Joran and  I were not invited to this dance"....did anyone else hear it that way?


Maybe not this particular soiree, but they need not be fearful of remaining wall flowers! Their own party will come soon enough!


Title: Lively Case Discussion #561 12/16 - 12/18/2006
Post by: Altruist on December 16, 2006, 11:05:08 PM
Somebody asked about Discovery in Civil Cases

There are loads of discovery.  The attorneys are able to prepare for the taking of the depositions after they have reviewed all documentation available through subpeona & what they have gathered on their own.  They prepare all of their questions based on the documentation & have it all their at the time of taking of the depositions so all follow up ?'s are handled at that time, especially regarding inconsistencies.

Depositions are better than watching criminal interogations, IMO as there are so many more known facts & statement follow up possible.

The are intense even though the attorney's for the most part demonstrate very little emotion.  Just the facts Jack, just the facts.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #561 12/16 - 12/18/2006
Post by: justinsmama on December 16, 2006, 11:05:38 PM
Ole Joey knows the original is valid, and that the tape that was aired on the Dr. Phil Show was not manipulated to make it appear that Deepak was admitting sexual activity by all of them. He is simply following his usual line of bs~ tell it loud and long enough and people will believe it.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #561 12/16 - 12/18/2006
Post by: Carnut on December 16, 2006, 11:05:53 PM
O/T, Wooowee!! ROTFLMAO!!!!!!

Just watched a Pet Shop commercial with a bunch of cute little puppie hopping around on christmas decorations.

Advertisement to get puppies for Christmas, then the statement that floored me, I know what they mean't but it really caught me a funny way.

'3 year warranty' on all puppies.

ROTFLMAO!!!!!


Title: Lively Case Discussion #561 12/16 - 12/18/2006
Post by: Altruist on December 16, 2006, 11:09:05 PM
Quote from: "igsigs"
NFI Report

To the best of my knowledge has never been released...or officially quoted. Dompig and Schippers both referenced the report as saying *manipulated*. That's it.


Imagine Arlene, a member of the tourist board, was given access to an official document like that.  It's a sick place that Devil's Rock.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #561 12/16 - 12/18/2006
Post by: LilPuma on December 16, 2006, 11:10:47 PM
Quote from: "igsigs"
NFI Report

To the best of my knowledge has never been released...or officially quoted. Dompig and Schippers both referenced the report as saying *manipulated*. That's it.


Dompig told Skeeters that he clearly heard Deepak say, She did. You'd be surprised how simple it was that night.    Then he did one of his usual backflips.  

Arlene went into great detail describing what the NFI said, claiming they said that No and n't were deleted.  IIRC, she said 6 people listened to Skeeters tape and determined Deepak said No she didn't. I'd guess that it was 6 members of ALE, but Arlene said NFI.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #561 12/16 - 12/18/2006
Post by: Kat_Gram on December 16, 2006, 11:10:53 PM
Quote from: "Altruist"
Quote from: "igsigs"
NFI Report

To the best of my knowledge has never been released...or officially quoted. Dompig and Schippers both referenced the report as saying *manipulated*. That's it.


Imagine Arlene, a member of the tourist board, was given access to an official document like that.  It's a sick place that Devil's Rock.

And yet, Beth can get nothing. That says it all.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #561 12/16 - 12/18/2006
Post by: Elaine on December 16, 2006, 11:12:03 PM
Quote from: "Carnut"
O/T, Wooowee!! ROTFLMAO!!!!!!

Just watched a Pet Shop commercial with a bunch of cute little puppie hopping around on christmas decorations.

Advertisement to get puppies for Christmas, then the statement that floored me, I know what they mean't but it really caught me a funny way.

'3 year warranty' on all puppies.

ROTFLMAO!!!!!
:lol:  :lol:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #561 12/16 - 12/18/2006
Post by: igsigs on December 16, 2006, 11:13:03 PM
Quote from: "Altruist"
Quote from: "igsigs"
NFI Report

To the best of my knowledge has never been released...or officially quoted. Dompig and Schippers both referenced the report as saying *manipulated*. That's it.


Imagine Arlene, a member of the tourist board, was given access to an official document like that.  It's a sick place that Devil's Rock.

And she is related to a suspect...don't forget. Actually i think Dompig is also.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #561 12/16 - 12/18/2006
Post by: LilPuma on December 16, 2006, 11:19:08 PM
Quote from: "Elaine"
Quote from: "Carnut"
O/T, Wooowee!! ROTFLMAO!!!!!!

Just watched a Pet Shop commercial with a bunch of cute little puppie hopping around on christmas decorations.

Advertisement to get puppies for Christmas, then the statement that floored me, I know what they mean't but it really caught me a funny way.

'3 year warranty' on all puppies.

ROTFLMAO!!!!!
:lol:  :lol:


That is cute!  Have you ever seen the Puppy Bowl?  Animal Planet has it each year during the Super Bowl.  It's a big puppy playpen that looks like a football field and they have a bunch of puppies and toys playing and frollicking.  They also have a waterbowl cam, so you can see them drinking.   :lol: No narration, just puppies.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #561 12/16 - 12/18/2006
Post by: casa on December 16, 2006, 11:20:36 PM
I personally thing that Joran should be very much afraid if the Kalpoes are forced to testify under oath!  If they have any sense they will spill the beans and tell what exactly happened that night. I don't think that will be good for Joran.  I don't think they will take the wrap for anything Joran did!


Title: Lively Case Discussion #561 12/16 - 12/18/2006
Post by: klaasend on December 16, 2006, 11:20:48 PM
Rumor has it the Kalpoe may be for sale.  I found this home in Hooiberg for sale..what do you think?

Does this look like the Kalpoe home?

http://www.absolutearuba.com/detail.html?id=526

(http://www.absolutearuba.com/graphics/photobook/417/front.jpg)

(http://www.absolutearuba.com/graphics/photobook/417/front2.jpg)

Actual photo of the Kalpoe home to compare:
(http://i37.photobucket.com/albums/e82/klaasend2/KalpoeHome2.jpg)


Title: Lively Case Discussion #561 12/16 - 12/18/2006
Post by: robots on December 16, 2006, 11:21:57 PM
Quote from: "justinsmama"
Ole Joey knows the original is valid, and that the tape that was aired on the Dr. Phil Show was not manipulated to make it appear that Deepak was admitting sexual activity by all of them. He is simply following his usual line of bs~ tell it loud and long enough and people will believe it.


just like ADOLPH HITLER  :twisted:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #561 12/16 - 12/18/2006
Post by: Carnut on December 16, 2006, 11:25:17 PM
Don't know Klaasend, the two top pics don't show any vestige of any kind of big hill in the background.

I know the angles are a bit different, but still think something would be showing up in the edge of the background of the first pic if they were the same location.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #561 12/16 - 12/18/2006
Post by: klaasend on December 16, 2006, 11:26:08 PM
Quote from: "Carnut"
Don't know Klaasend, the two top pics don't show any vestige of any kind of big hill in the background.

I know the angles are a bit different, but still think something would be showing up in the edge of the background of the first pic if they were the same location.

Carnut, you are probably right.  Just thought it was close enough to share.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #561 12/16 - 12/18/2006
Post by: LilPuma on December 16, 2006, 11:28:08 PM
Quote from: "klaasend"
Rumor has it the Kalpoe may be for sale.  I found this home in Hooiberg for sale..what do you think?


Number on the black post is 8621.  Could this be an address?


Title: Lively Case Discussion #561 12/16 - 12/18/2006
Post by: Carnut on December 16, 2006, 11:29:37 PM
Quote from: "klaasend"
Quote from: "Carnut"
Don't know Klaasend, the two top pics don't show any vestige of any kind of big hill in the background.

I know the angles are a bit different, but still think something would be showing up in the edge of the background of the first pic if they were the same location.

Carnut, you are probably right.  Just thought it was close enough to share.


Also if the bottom pic is the real place and it's the one to the right of the pic, then the garage is on the wrong side and the windows are different.

If the 2K's place is to the left of the bottom pic then the roof is wrong, it's got a slopped roof while the top pics seem to be a flat roof.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #561 12/16 - 12/18/2006
Post by: Carnut on December 16, 2006, 11:31:44 PM
Is that hill in the background of the bottom pic the famous 'high spot' on the island?


Title: Lively Case Discussion #561 12/16 - 12/18/2006
Post by: casa on December 16, 2006, 11:32:22 PM
They look like different housed to me.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #561 12/16 - 12/18/2006
Post by: klaasend on December 16, 2006, 11:33:14 PM
Quote from: "LilPuma"
Quote from: "klaasend"
Rumor has it the Kalpoe may be for sale.  I found this home in Hooiberg for sale..what do you think?


Number on the black post is 8621.  Could this be an address?


Nope, that's not an address.  The addresses in Aruba are usuall one or 2 digits sometimes followed by a letter.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #561 12/16 - 12/18/2006
Post by: crazybabyborg on December 16, 2006, 11:35:44 PM
Quote from: "Carnut"
O/T, Wooowee!! ROTFLMAO!!!!!!

Just watched a Pet Shop commercial with a bunch of cute little puppie hopping around on christmas decorations.

Advertisement to get puppies for Christmas, then the statement that floored me, I know what they mean't but it really caught me a funny way.

'3 year warranty' on all puppies.

ROTFLMAO!!!!!


Well, since you're laughing too, I was just sent this card. It "sleighed" me!  :lol:  :lol:  :lol:
 http://www.thecompassgroup.biz/merryxmas.swf


Title: Lively Case Discussion #561 12/16 - 12/18/2006
Post by: Kat_Gram on December 16, 2006, 11:36:25 PM
Maybe it's their IQ.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #561 12/16 - 12/18/2006
Post by: Carnut on December 16, 2006, 11:37:21 PM
Quote from: "klaasend"
Quote from: "LilPuma"
Quote from: "klaasend"
Rumor has it the Kalpoe may be for sale.  I found this home in Hooiberg for sale..what do you think?


Number on the black post is 8621.  Could this be an address?


Nope, that's not an address.  The addresses in Aruba are usuall one or 2 digits sometimes followed by a letter.


Yeah, it's probably the telephone pole number, probably like to keep track of them just incase someone steals one.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #561 12/16 - 12/18/2006
Post by: Lala'sMom on December 16, 2006, 11:39:24 PM
Did anyone ever find the rest of the Skeeters tape transcript?  Just wondering?


Title: Lively Case Discussion #561 12/16 - 12/18/2006
Post by: klaasend on December 16, 2006, 11:40:44 PM
Quote from: "klaasend"
Quote from: "LilPuma"
Quote from: "klaasend"
Rumor has it the Kalpoe may be for sale.  I found this home in Hooiberg for sale..what do you think?


Number on the black post is 8621.  Could this be an address?


Nope, that's not an address.  The addresses in Aruba are usuall one or 2 digits sometimes followed by a letter.


Had to go look it up.  The Kalpoe address is 91-B Hooiberg


Title: Lively Case Discussion #561 12/16 - 12/18/2006
Post by: San on December 16, 2006, 11:44:13 PM
A Little From The Line Up with Kimberly Guilfoyle:

Kimberly – Two new lawsuits have been filed with the disappearance of Natalee Holloway.  The parents of the missing Alabama teen have filed a wrongful death suit against Satish and Deepak Kalpoe two former suspects in the case and at the same time the Kalpoe Brothers say talk show host Dr. Phil McGraw defamed them when he aired a secretly taped interview with Deepak.  They are suing Dr. Phil for liable and slander.  What do you make of this Georgia do you think they have any kind of case at all against Dr. Phil?

Georgia – Well I really when I think about it I’m really not sure that they have a case against Dr. Phil.  First of all I think that Dr. Phil has a high level of integrity.  I think he’s a little too intelligent to knowingly participate or have someone as an agent to participate in doctoring a tape to make it look like these guy made those comments. So just alone on that I just don’t think he’s the type of person based upon what I know and see about him.  I think he has a high level of integrity.  Let alone from that I just don’t see any real of evidence that they have.  I mean to file a lawsuit they do it every day, to carry a burden of proof is another thing.  So right now from what I see I just don’t think it’s going anywhere.

Kimberly – So tell me what do you make of this case.  You were able to prevail in yours getting it tossed out.  What about this case.

Joe Tacopina – I don’t know its interesting Kimberly I mean unfortunately we are not invited to this dance and Joran is not a party to this lawsuit and I’ll note that the drastic different.  In the lawsuit that was filed by the Holloway family that we got dismissed Joran was not charged in that lawsuit they didn’t allege that he participated in the death of Natalee Holloway.  It was a suit that talked about you know a kidnapping claim and an assault claim but not certainly participating in her death.  In this instance in the Kalpoe lawsuit they do allege that these two individuals the brothers caused her death and I think that’s a drastic difference and I don’t know what evidence John has.  Certainly there is not harm not foul and obviously they want to go forward and try and get depositions and pursue evidence.  And look they brought this lawsuit in California Kimberly they submitted themselves to the jurisdiction and now they sort of got what they asked for they have litigation so it will be interesting to see how it turns out.

Kimberly – Alright Joe Tacopina being fair and balanced tonight I like that.  So basically your saying it is a different lawsuit and the jurisdictional issues are overcome so they are kind of a step ahead in this one don’t you think.

Joe Tacopina – Oh sure, look it doesn’t mean that they are going to get anywhere Kimberly what it doesn’t mean that this lawsuits actually going to go forward, doesn’t mean that they are ever going to take that positions.   But what it does mean is that if the Kalpoe brothers truly want to pursue a claim against Dr. Phil first that was in fact doctored there is no question.  The question is whether Dr. Phil knew it or not because there were no admissions on the real tape, the one that was doctored had admissions on it but if they really want to pursue that they are going to have to answer questions by the Holloway family under oath if the judge allows it to be considered a companion case.  I think what’s going to wind up happening here now is that they are probably going to walk away from their Dr. Phil lawsuit and you know they will probably never get deposed in the United States.

Kimberly – Alright, Randy I’ll give you the last word.  What do you think of the merits?

Randy Kravis – I mean you know it is hard to believe that Dr. Phil knowingly would do something like this.  So it is questionable whether the facts are true or not but if they are maybe it is a valid lawsuit.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #561 12/16 - 12/18/2006
Post by: Altruist on December 16, 2006, 11:44:36 PM
I just finished copying & pasting it into my word processing program, it was all done in tables, so got rid of that for my own purposes.

Am going to post it now.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #561 12/16 - 12/18/2006
Post by: klaasend on December 16, 2006, 11:46:34 PM
Quote from: "Lala'sMom"
Did anyone ever find the rest of the Skeeters tape transcript?  Just wondering?

Yep, I just posted the part I missed.  It was the last segment.  Here's the part you were looking for:

Deepak Kalpoe: And, um, still has the nerve to come tell us, you know. (I) mean, come
on, the Aruban people, we, our familes, to tell you, quite frankly, we gave enough for someone, to tell you the truth, dressed like a slut, talked like one, was a racist…

Jamie Skeeters: The mother, I mean the daughter?


Deepak Kalpoe: The daughter.


Jamie Skeeters: Really?


Deepak Kalpoe: Was a racist, I mentioned.And um, would go in a car with three
strange guys. And her mother claiming her to be the little goody two shoes. Come on. Enough with the BS already. It's been enough. And, I can tell Beth on her face, I don’t care. I mean, go and say bad things on us. We don’t need any of this. We just don’t care anymore. I can tell Beth, you know, on her face, on camera, you know, "Screw you, go home. You made my life miserable. You ended it."


Title: Lively Case Discussion #561 12/16 - 12/18/2006
Post by: klaasend on December 16, 2006, 11:47:20 PM
Thanks San!


Title: Lively Case Discussion #561 12/16 - 12/18/2006
Post by: klaasend on December 16, 2006, 11:47:59 PM
Quote from: "Altruist"
I just finished copying & pasting it into my word processing program, it was all done in tables, so got rid of that for my own purposes.

Am going to post it now.


Thanks!  I may have missed something else so it will be good if you post it also!


Title: Lively Case Discussion #561 12/16 - 12/18/2006
Post by: Lala'sMom on December 16, 2006, 11:48:30 PM
CBB
Thanks for sharing that card with us...it "sleighed" me too.   :lol:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #561 12/16 - 12/18/2006
Post by: Lala'sMom on December 16, 2006, 11:52:12 PM
Quote from: "klaasend"
Quote from: "Lala'sMom"
Did anyone ever find the rest of the Skeeters tape transcript?  Just wondering?

Yep, I just posted the part I missed.  It was the last segment.  Here's the part you were looking for:

Deepak Kalpoe: And, um, still has the nerve to come tell us, you know. (I) mean, come
on, the Aruban people, we, our familes, to tell you, quite frankly, we gave enough for someone, to tell you the truth, dressed like a slut, talked like one, was a racist…

Jamie Skeeters: The mother, I mean the daughter?


Deepak Kalpoe: The daughter.


Jamie Skeeters: Really?


Deepak Kalpoe: Was a racist, I mentioned.And um, would go in a car with three
strange guys. And her mother claiming her to be the little goody two shoes. Come on. Enough with the BS already. It's been enough. And, I can tell Beth on her face, I don’t care. I mean, go and say bad things on us. We don’t need any of this. We just don’t care anymore. I can tell Beth, you know, on her face, on camera, you know, "Screw you, go home. You made my life miserable. You ended it."


Now let's read that aloud in a CA court and see  Natalee's mother sitting across the table...Deepak, you're and idiot!


Title: Lively Case Discussion #561 12/16 - 12/18/2006
Post by: Florida on December 16, 2006, 11:52:26 PM
(http://i20.photobucket.com/albums/b223/NYSusan/kalpoeshome.jpg)
Luis Ramirez
Hooiberg 91-B

Haystack Residence
Hooiberg 91 D
http://www.arubahaystack.com/en/welcome.html

Robert Wever (Guido's father)
Paradera 1-E
Paradera Apts.
http://www.paraderapark-aruba.com/


Title: Lively Case Discussion #561 12/16 - 12/18/2006
Post by: crazybabyborg on December 16, 2006, 11:52:47 PM
Quote from: "Lala'sMom"
CBB
Thanks for sharing that card with us...it "sleighed" me too.   :lol:


 :wink: Your welcome!


Reading the transcript of what Deepak had to say, just burns me up all over again. Beth should be proud; I believe she's the no. 1 most hated among those three and that's a place of honor!


Title: Lively Case Discussion #561 12/16 - 12/18/2006
Post by: Lala'sMom on December 16, 2006, 11:54:36 PM
Quote from: "Altruist"
I just finished copying & pasting it into my word processing program, it was all done in tables, so got rid of that for my own purposes.

Am going to post it now.


Thanks. I think we need it in it's entirety to actually see what is going on.  Maybe Dr. Phil will play the entire tape on his show.  It has a better effect when you actually hear it for yourself.  Sympathy goes right out the door for the poor, pitiful Kalpoes.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #561 12/16 - 12/18/2006
Post by: Lala'sMom on December 17, 2006, 12:00:53 AM
Oh and one more thing...Deepak... you are the one that made your life miserable by not helping Natalee when she was in distress.  You could have prevented this by just taking her back to the hotel like she thought you were doing.  You had the power to put her out of that car when you were on the corner and her friends were there.  Whether she was drunk or drugged, all you had to do was leave her with her friends...instead you let Joran make the call.  Now, Joran will let you and Satish pay the price.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #561 12/16 - 12/18/2006
Post by: Carnut on December 17, 2006, 12:02:57 AM
Quote from: "Lala'sMom"
Oh and one more thing...Deepak... you are the one that made your life miserable by not helping Natalee when she was in distress.  You could have prevented this by just taking her back to the hotel like she thought you were doing.  You had the power to put her out of that car when you were on the corner and her friends were there.  Whether she was drunk or drugged, all you had to do was leave her with her friends...instead you let Joran make the call.  Now, Joran will let you and Satish pay the price.


Yep, all Deepak has to blame is himself and/or Joran.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #561 12/16 - 12/18/2006
Post by: Lala'sMom on December 17, 2006, 12:04:08 AM
Quote from: "Carnut"
Quote from: "Lala'sMom"
Oh and one more thing...Deepak... you are the one that made your life miserable by not helping Natalee when she was in distress.  You could have prevented this by just taking her back to the hotel like she thought you were doing.  You had the power to put her out of that car when you were on the corner and her friends were there.  Whether she was drunk or drugged, all you had to do was leave her with her friends...instead you let Joran make the call.  Now, Joran will let you and Satish pay the price.


Yep, all Deepak has to blame is himself and/or Joran.


If we continue to agree like this, I will have to put you on my "nice" list.  :wink:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #561 12/16 - 12/18/2006
Post by: Carnut on December 17, 2006, 12:05:09 AM
Quote from: "Lala'sMom"
Quote from: "Carnut"
Quote from: "Lala'sMom"
Oh and one more thing...Deepak... you are the one that made your life miserable by not helping Natalee when she was in distress.  You could have prevented this by just taking her back to the hotel like she thought you were doing.  You had the power to put her out of that car when you were on the corner and her friends were there.  Whether she was drunk or drugged, all you had to do was leave her with her friends...instead you let Joran make the call.  Now, Joran will let you and Satish pay the price.


Yep, all Deepak has to blame is himself and/or Joran.


If we continue to agree like this, I will have to put you on my "nice" list.  :wink:


Don't worry, I'll recover.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #561 12/16 - 12/18/2006
Post by: Carnut on December 17, 2006, 12:07:06 AM
Quote from: "Lala'sMom"
Oh and one more thing...Deepak... you are the one that made your life miserable by not helping Natalee when she was in distress.  You could have prevented this by just taking her back to the hotel like she thought you were doing.  You had the power to put her out of that car when you were on the corner and her friends were there.  Whether she was drunk or drugged, all you had to do was leave her with her friends...instead you let Joran make the call.  Now, Joran will let you and Satish pay the price.


Also just another example of how these folks all seem to see the world upside down or inside out or something.

There's gotta be something wrong with those folks.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #561 12/16 - 12/18/2006
Post by: Lala'sMom on December 17, 2006, 12:08:33 AM
I think these folks have been pulling from the bottom of the gene pool so long there isn't much left to choose from.   :lol:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #561 12/16 - 12/18/2006
Post by: crazybabyborg on December 17, 2006, 12:09:45 AM
Deepak Kalpoe: Was a racist, I mentioned.And um, would go in a car with three
strange guys. And her mother claiming her to be the little goody two shoes. Come on. Enough with the BS already. It's been enough. And, I can tell Beth on her face, I don’t care. I mean, go and say bad things on us. We don’t need any of this. We just don’t care anymore. I can tell Beth, you know, on her face, on camera, you know, "Screw you, go home. You made my life miserable. You ended it."

 :evil:  :evil:  :evil:
Isn't it just rich that Deepak is making assumptions about Natalee's character because she rode in a car with three guys when HE was the one driving it? The "racisit" comment is enough for me to know that he's spilling the rehearsed position. Natalee making racisits comments is contrary to EVERYTHING known about her. He's on a role here, and the fact, IMO, that he also KNEW she had been drugged isn't part of the script.
His little outburst of "I don't care", to Beth's face has to do with the one on one conversation Beth had with him in the internet cafe, IMO. You know she appealed to him not only with the reward money, but on the basis of human decency.
And with the "Screw You, Go Home, You made my life miserable, you ended it" comes Beth's sole heroic victory of accomplishment. She did that in the opposition of corruption, lies, and an all out effort from every authority that she SHOULD have been able to turn to and trust to help her find her daughter.
God Bless Beth. She should be the poster child for all Mothers.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #561 12/16 - 12/18/2006
Post by: justinsmama on December 17, 2006, 12:09:47 AM
Quote from: "Carnut"
Quote from: "Lala'sMom"
Oh and one more thing...Deepak... you are the one that made your life miserable by not helping Natalee when she was in distress.  You could have prevented this by just taking her back to the hotel like she thought you were doing.  You had the power to put her out of that car when you were on the corner and her friends were there.  Whether she was drunk or drugged, all you had to do was leave her with her friends...instead you let Joran make the call.  Now, Joran will let you and Satish pay the price.


Also just another example of how these folks all seem to see the world upside down or inside out or something.

There's gotta be something wrong with those folks.


Ya think?


Title: Lively Case Discussion #561 12/16 - 12/18/2006
Post by: klaasend on December 17, 2006, 12:09:56 AM
(http://i37.photobucket.com/albums/e82/klaasend2/MonkeyCourtroomDeepak.jpg)


Title: Lively Case Discussion #561 12/16 - 12/18/2006
Post by: justinsmama on December 17, 2006, 12:12:23 AM
Natalee's family and friends are polar opposites of those involved in her disappearance and the cover up.

Klaas~ You've outdone yourself! LOL!


Title: Lively Case Discussion #561 12/16 - 12/18/2006
Post by: crazybabyborg on December 17, 2006, 12:12:34 AM
LOL, Klaas!

Deepak doesn't look to happy to be there, either!  :wink:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #561 12/16 - 12/18/2006
Post by: justinsmama on December 17, 2006, 12:14:18 AM
Goodnight all. I'm pretty durn beat.

Crazy~ I love calling you and crazymom "Crazy"! BTW, where's crazymom been? Hope she's okay.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #561 12/16 - 12/18/2006
Post by: Carnut on December 17, 2006, 12:16:38 AM
Quote from: "crazybabyborg"
Deepak Kalpoe: Was a racist, I mentioned.And um, would go in a car with three
strange guys. And her mother claiming her to be the little goody two shoes. Come on. Enough with the BS already. It's been enough. And, I can tell Beth on her face, I don’t care. I mean, go and say bad things on us. We don’t need any of this. We just don’t care anymore. I can tell Beth, you know, on her face, on camera, you know, "Screw you, go home. You made my life miserable. You ended it."
 


We saw how courageous Deepak was when Beth confronted him in at the Internet Cafe.

He didn't say a whole lot to her face there.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #561 12/16 - 12/18/2006
Post by: crazybabyborg on December 17, 2006, 12:17:06 AM
Quote from: "justinsmama"
Goodnight all. I'm pretty durn beat.

Crazy~ I love calling you and crazymom "Crazy"! BTW, where's crazymom been? Hope she's okay.


Nite Justins! I like "hearing" it from you, too!  :wink:

Haven't seen my sis in a while.
Crazymom? PHONE HOME!


Title: Lively Case Discussion #561 12/16 - 12/18/2006
Post by: Lala'sMom on December 17, 2006, 12:17:45 AM
Night Justins, sweet dreams.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #561 12/16 - 12/18/2006
Post by: crazybabyborg on December 17, 2006, 12:20:59 AM
Quote from: "Carnut"
Quote from: "crazybabyborg"
Deepak Kalpoe: Was a racist, I mentioned.And um, would go in a car with three
strange guys. And her mother claiming her to be the little goody two shoes. Come on. Enough with the BS already. It's been enough. And, I can tell Beth on her face, I don’t care. I mean, go and say bad things on us. We don’t need any of this. We just don’t care anymore. I can tell Beth, you know, on her face, on camera, you know, "Screw you, go home. You made my life miserable. You ended it."
 


We saw how courageous Deepak was when Beth confronted him in at the Internet Cafe.

He didn't say a whole lot to her face there.


Thanks for that good memory, Carnut. No, he hardly looked her in the eye, did he? Well, after all, it was just Deepak facing ALL OF HER!  :lol:

Seriously, truth, even in the form of a slight, blonde, southern lady, is a formidable force against evil!


Title: Lively Case Discussion #561 12/16 - 12/18/2006
Post by: Altruist on December 17, 2006, 12:22:29 AM
Well after reading much of that transcript all I can say is that DK is not a sympathetic or convincing victim.

He is lying all the way through to Skeeter's.  Playing a pony show for him.  Wish Skeeter's was listening to what the creep was saying so that he could follow up in a more detailed manner.

First DK makes like he isn't familiar with Dr Phil show & then he admits to watching at least 4 or 5 of his shows.

DK says that Greta offered him 4.5 million to do an exclusive, THERE IS NO WAY THAT IS TRUE.

DK says that they know alot more.  OK anything you know should have been told during the interrogations.

& oh yeah, the best of all the totally inappropriate & unbelievable DK references to Natalee specifically.  What is the code on the Devil's Rock?  If a young lady gets into a car that she is a slut & she wants to f*** it's inhabitants & when she doesn't it's because she is a racist?  Man, warped & ignorant beyond belief is all I can say to that mentality.

DK  I told Beth everything…she won't believe us, of course.yeah, right

DK  As far as goes for Beth, Beth just wants us…who is telling him this, were his ears open when was speaking to him in the cafe?

DK He couldn't join the military cuz he's too short, but he doesn't know his own length.  You can't make it up, he doesn't know how tall he is?  What a liar.

Flippin Skeeter's didn't even ask DK, why he believed that NH was deceased.  Now I just don't understand that at all.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #561 12/16 - 12/18/2006
Post by: crazybabyborg on December 17, 2006, 12:25:46 AM
Quote from: "Altruist"
Well after reading much of that transcript all I can say is that DK is not a sympathetic or convincing victim.

He is lying all the way through to Skeeter's.  Playing a pony show for him.  Wish Skeeter's was listening to what the creep was saying so that he could follow up in a more detailed manner.

First DK makes like he isn't familiar with Dr Phil show & then he admits to watching at least 4 or 5 of his shows.

DK says that Greta offered him 4.5 million to do an exclusive, THERE IS NO WAY THAT IS TRUE.

DK says that they know alot more.  OK anything you know should have been told during the interrogations.

& oh yeah, the best of all the totally inappropriate & unbelievable DK references to Natalee specifically.  What is the code on the Devil's Rock?  If a young lady gets into a car that she is a slut & she wants to f*** it's inhabitants & when she doesn't it's because she is a racist?  Man, warped & ignorant beyond belief is all I can say to that mentality.

DK  I told Beth everything…she won't believe us, of course.yeah, right

DK  As far as goes for Beth, Beth just wants us…who is telling him this, were his ears open when was speaking to him in the cafe?

DK He couldn't join the military cuz he's too short, but he doesn't know his own length.  You can't make it up, he doesn't know how tall he is?  What a liar.

Flippin Skeeter's didn't even ask DK, why he believed that NH was deceased.  Now I just don't understand that at all.


I remember being frustrated at the conversation when I first heard it. I was thinking: I wish someone skilled in the art of interrogation could have had that conversation.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #561 12/16 - 12/18/2006
Post by: Lala'sMom on December 17, 2006, 12:28:17 AM
I didn't know that Deepak talked to Beth and told her anything.  It was my impression the only person she ever spoke to was Joran. Did I miss something?


Title: Lively Case Discussion #561 12/16 - 12/18/2006
Post by: Lala'sMom on December 17, 2006, 12:31:23 AM
It's perfectly fine for Deepak to lie and send two security guards to jail and not be held responsible for it. Let Beth, the mother of the child they whisked away in a car never to be seen again, ask Deepak a question and dog them night and day wanting answers and it's all her fault.  Get over yourself, boy!


Title: Lively Case Discussion #561 12/16 - 12/18/2006
Post by: crazybabyborg on December 17, 2006, 12:31:46 AM
Quote from: "Lala'sMom"
I didn't know that Deepak talked to Beth and told her anything.  It was my impression the only person she ever spoke to was Joran. Did I miss something?


Lala's. I don't know if Deepak said anything to her, but Beth went to the internet Cafe while Deepak was working, and stood in front of him and talked to him. Greta ( I think?) caught it on film. Beth said she tried to tempt him the reward money, and tried to appeal to him as a Mother of a missing child. He looked very, very, uncomfortable and reluctant to look at her.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #561 12/16 - 12/18/2006
Post by: Lala'sMom on December 17, 2006, 12:34:09 AM
Quote from: "crazybabyborg"
Quote from: "Lala'sMom"
I didn't know that Deepak talked to Beth and told her anything.  It was my impression the only person she ever spoke to was Joran. Did I miss something?


Lala's. I don't know if Deepak said anything to her, but Beth went to the internet Cafe while Deepak was working, and stood in front of him and talked to him. Greta ( I think?) caught it on film. Beth said she tried to tempt him the reward money, and tried to appeal to him as a Mother of a missing child. He looked very, very, uncomfortable and reluctant to look at her.


I well remember that, but Deepak says he told her everything...I didn't think that he ever spoke to her and told her anything at all about her daughter and that night.  I could be wrong.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #561 12/16 - 12/18/2006
Post by: crazybabyborg on December 17, 2006, 12:35:00 AM
Quote from: "Lala'sMom"
Quote from: "crazybabyborg"
Quote from: "Lala'sMom"
I didn't know that Deepak talked to Beth and told her anything.  It was my impression the only person she ever spoke to was Joran. Did I miss something?


Lala's. I don't know if Deepak said anything to her, but Beth went to the internet Cafe while Deepak was working, and stood in front of him and talked to him. Greta ( I think?) caught it on film. Beth said she tried to tempt him the reward money, and tried to appeal to him as a Mother of a missing child. He looked very, very, uncomfortable and reluctant to look at her.


I well remember that, but Deepak says he told her everything...I didn't think that he ever spoke to her and told her anything at all about her daughter and that night.  I could be wrong.


No, I think you're exactly right. Lala's.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #561 12/16 - 12/18/2006
Post by: mishy on December 17, 2006, 12:35:25 AM
I don't want to throw off on Skeeters since he was the only one (besides Beth) who had a face to face with Deepak, but he did miss a golden opportunity for asking the right questions.

I'm sure he was treading lightly so as not to run Deepak off. But that woop sound he made really sorta bugs me. For one, it's a very strange thing to do, and it also comes at a very inopportune time in the "interview," as it could be construed as being made to "disguise or cover up" what Deepak was saying. Am I making sense here?


Title: Lively Case Discussion #561 12/16 - 12/18/2006
Post by: klaasend on December 17, 2006, 12:35:38 AM
Quote from: "Lala'sMom"
Quote from: "crazybabyborg"
Quote from: "Lala'sMom"
I didn't know that Deepak talked to Beth and told her anything.  It was my impression the only person she ever spoke to was Joran. Did I miss something?


Lala's. I don't know if Deepak said anything to her, but Beth went to the internet Cafe while Deepak was working, and stood in front of him and talked to him. Greta ( I think?) caught it on film. Beth said she tried to tempt him the reward money, and tried to appeal to him as a Mother of a missing child. He looked very, very, uncomfortable and reluctant to look at her.


I well remember that, but Deepak says he told her everything...I didn't think that he ever spoke to her and told her anything at all about her daughter and that night.  I could be wrong.

I don't think Beth was there long enough for Deepak to tell her anything.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #561 12/16 - 12/18/2006
Post by: Kat_Gram on December 17, 2006, 12:40:19 AM
At the Cafe, Deepak looked guilty. He, man that he is, could not even look into her eyes. And the he complained that she harassed him. Well, she did, but so what, suck it up Rat Faced Boy. ..
.
BTW, they chose trial by jury in their lawsuit.
Man oh Man did they get advice from the stooooopid.  
Hey Deepak.... you were offered some money . Someone is going to give you money, TAKE IT. That is my rule .


Title: Lively Case Discussion #561 12/16 - 12/18/2006
Post by: LilPuma on December 17, 2006, 12:41:40 AM
Quote from: "Lala'sMom"
Quote from: "klaasend"
Quote from: "Lala'sMom"
Did anyone ever find the rest of the Skeeters tape transcript?  Just wondering?

Yep, I just posted the part I missed.  It was the last segment.  Here's the part you were looking for:

Deepak Kalpoe: And, um, still has the nerve to come tell us, you know. (I) mean, come
on, the Aruban people, we, our familes, to tell you, quite frankly, we gave enough for someone, to tell you the truth, dressed like a slut, talked like one, was a racist…

Jamie Skeeters: The mother, I mean the daughter?


Deepak Kalpoe: The daughter.


Jamie Skeeters: Really?


Deepak Kalpoe: Was a racist, I mentioned.And um, would go in a car with three
strange guys. And her mother claiming her to be the little goody two shoes. Come on. Enough with the BS already. It's been enough. And, I can tell Beth on her face, I don’t care. I mean, go and say bad things on us. We don’t need any of this. We just don’t care anymore. I can tell Beth, you know, on her face, on camera, you know, "Screw you, go home. You made my life miserable. You ended it."


Now let's read that aloud in a CA court and see  Natalee's mother sitting across the table...Deepak, you're and idiot!


In the Dr. Phil suit, Beth won't be sitting at the table, but I'm knitpicking.  But since the tape is the subject of this lawsuit, I'm sure the jury will get to hear his anger, his contempt for the Natalee, his blaming the victim.  I want to hit him with a sledge hammer when he says "you made my life miserable.  You ended it."    Or maybe just give him a doctored drink and drive him somewhere.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #561 12/16 - 12/18/2006
Post by: Lala'sMom on December 17, 2006, 12:48:42 AM
Puma
You are correct Beth won't be there, but just think how it sounds to all of us.  I can't wait for the tape to be played in court to a jury that some of them have their own children.  Most parents would do or at the least attempt to do what Beth did had their child gone missing.  I know I would.  Actually, I would have already taken the matter into my own hands and be in jail myself...but I digress...I am not as strong and courageous as Beth or Dave.  I don't have the patience they do. I so admire them for what they have done in all this. I know I have been on a rant about his today and maybe I will give it a rest for a while, but it just brings it all back to the guilty 3 that rode off into the wind with Natalee in the back seat of Deepak's car, never to  be seen again.  I have no sympathy for any of them and I dare say there are few in the USA that do.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #561 12/16 - 12/18/2006
Post by: Kat_Gram on December 17, 2006, 12:49:38 AM
I know that Skeeters has been a friend to the HT's. what I don't like about that tape is too much Skeeters, not enuf Deepak. But, to give him his due, he did get Deepak to say some stuff that is there that shows all who read or listen to the entire tape what Deepak is all about. and it isn't a pretty sight.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #561 12/16 - 12/18/2006
Post by: Altruist on December 17, 2006, 12:51:05 AM
Deepak Kalpoe:   Did he do Runaway Bride? (laughs)

Jamie Skeeters:   Yeah. A friend of mine did that show.

Deepak Kalpoe:   What's up with her anyways? (laughs)But, she made pretty good money with the book deal.. and..

Jamie Skeeters:   Yeah, she turned it around and did good. Made a movie. They're  makin' a movie out of it.

Deepak Kalpoe:   Yeah? I haven't been, been reading on the book….     She's making a movie now? Good for her.

Wonder how DK felt when he learned that the Runaway Bride didn't get her hands on any of the money from the book/movie, cuz the Fiance has it all & she now has to sue him for it.  Think there is a better chance than not that a Jury will not find in her favor for people who offend should NOT prosper from their nasty deeds.

This creep had no intention to take a polygraph, he wanted to know what Skeeter's knew.  JVDS probably could pass a polygraph test as he, IMO, is a sociopath & they have a free reign with the test as they don't have a conscience, DK wouldn't pass.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #561 12/16 - 12/18/2006
Post by: crazybabyborg on December 17, 2006, 12:51:15 AM
Beth could be there in the court audience, couldn't she?

My bet is that she would choose to be.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #561 12/16 - 12/18/2006
Post by: Lala'sMom on December 17, 2006, 12:54:10 AM
Time for me to hug Nemo and seek sleep.  I am tired after all my ranting. I bid you all goodnight.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #561 12/16 - 12/18/2006
Post by: Altruist on December 17, 2006, 01:02:10 AM
Quote from: "Lala'sMom"
Puma
You are correct Beth won't be there, but just think how it sounds to all of us.  I can't wait for the tape to be played in court to a jury that some of them have their own children.  Most parents would do or at the least attempt to do what Beth did had their child gone missing.  I know I would.  Actually, I would have already taken the matter into my own hands and be in jail myself...but I digress...I am not as strong and courageous as Beth or Dave.  I don't have the patience they do. I so admire them for what they have done in all this. I know I have been on a rant about his today and maybe I will give it a rest for a while, but it just brings it all back to the guilty 3 that rode off into the wind with Natalee in the back seat of Deepak's car, never to  be seen again.  I have no sympathy for any of them and I dare say there are few in the USA that do.


Well, IMO if the attorneys for Dr. Phil wanted Beth Holloway Twitty or Dave Holloway to be present during the taking of depositions they could probably be there.  It's their dime, maybe Appeals can tell us that.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #561 12/16 - 12/18/2006
Post by: crazybabyborg on December 17, 2006, 01:15:30 AM
Come to think of it, my sister was involved in a civil suit, and she and her opponant were present, with their attorneys for all depositions taken.

Of course, it was their case. I would hope that would apply to a related case.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #561 12/16 - 12/18/2006
Post by: crazybabyborg on December 17, 2006, 01:16:26 AM
I'm tuckered out. Going to get ready for some sleep.

Have a great night!


Title: Lively Case Discussion #561 12/16 - 12/18/2006
Post by: spooky112483 on December 17, 2006, 02:18:32 AM
Quote from: "Altruist"
Quote from: "Lala'sMom"
Would some really smart monkey please review the Skeeters tape that Klaas left for us from Roger at Scrux and tell me where the comment about Natalee  dressing like a slut is located?  I seem to have missed it and I have read it several times...it must be my eyes. TIA


It isn't there Lala'sMom.  Think that Klaas thought she copied it all but it was obviously at capacity of her copy ability so it was cut off.  I will see if I can copy it from that point.


I am several pages behind but I have to say...ya'll really believe Rogers transcript???!!
First of all I dont trust Roger but giving him the benefit of the doubt he was given the ARUBAN VERSION of the tape...imo the ALTERED BY ARUBA VERSION of the tape....no we dont have the transcipts from the ORIGINAL TRUE SKEETERS tape, that has not been given out to us on the internet.
DO NOT believe the Rogers/Aruban version transcript....
gees,especially if it does not contain the deepak "slut" ramblings because WE ALL HEARD IT on EVERY MSM program when it came out :!:  :roll:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #561 12/16 - 12/18/2006
Post by: casa on December 17, 2006, 02:51:12 AM
Guess I was talking to myself so I will go


Title: Video transmissions
Post by: IBE on December 17, 2006, 03:12:42 AM
CBB--who is Roger?

Hi all you late night and early morning Monkeys!!!

About a week or so ago, we "the later night-early morning" Monkeys were discussing that if a video was made in real time then how could it be stored then distributed or distributed in real time.

I had wondered if Wi-Fi from the hotels could reach as far as the vdS home or Freddy's home, for anything thing done in real time or to archive would need a large bandwidth or if they had wi-fi on their own.

Think it was Anna or Crazybabyborg or Lala.. can't remember which one, mentioned how odd it was that in one of his testimonies, Depak made a point to say he was sitting in front of his computer. meaning, I guess, usually verses one is  usually "at" his computer.

IMO he might have been pointing out the sitting vs. being somewhere with Joran or it was glued there for a reason.

I found something interesting following the rental at Hoilberg that there is wireless  Is Depak's home in the same complex?  It wouldn't really matter for you could go into a wireless if they didn't require registration and he'd certainly be in the range.

Here's what Haystack 91-D says in their blub:
Quote
WIRELESS INTERNET:  Aruba vacation Villa Park Haystack Residence has a wireless connection system for you, in all the Apartments and all the Villa’s , so that you can work with your own portable computer ,.........(snip).. Internet in the Apartments and the Villa’s 24 our / day, or by the Swimming Pool , wireless, ......(snip)...When you want to use our wireless network , then your LAPTOP must have the following: a WIFI adapter, with a steering system of minimum WindoCrazybabyborgws 2000 professional and 1 free USB gate. When you have not an adapter then we have the possibility that you can buy one from us, a USB WIFI adapter, able for our wireless system.


Lala.... are you there? or does anyone remember early on a big discussions about the transmissions of wireless, "singing birds" and they kept mentioning Hoilberg and the Haystacks early on,.

Don't know where I am going in this... but there is just something that keeps bringing my thoughts back to electronic communications on the island, the porn video re: one of the pimps, (Shango, think mentioned that early on) and the fact that the Kapoe's bought the Internet Cafe.

Also the fact that, at least what has been released seems to leave many gaps of information that should have been gathered in the computers of the 3, and the cell phones. Still think the key is in there somewhere.

OH,,, if his dad owns the Cafe now, then how has Depak's "profession" has gotten worse. Seems it would be better if your dad now owned the hub of wi-fi,  and computers; you'd be manager, consultant or something high in the operation of a family business.

If Depak and Satish are clean, I wish they'd come forward about it and then could get on with their lives.

Oh, Joey T was the calmest tonight that I have ever heard him in all the years on TV.

KEEP UP THE GOOD WORK MONKEYS

IBE

PS.. Carnut.. visited your site and wanted to leave a message in the guest book on how neat the site was.. but couldn't get the link to work. Had the first 1956 Crown Victoria 1956 Ford 4 door hard top.. red and white and saw your 56 or 57 Chevy there.Sure wish I still had that car! It was sexy and fast (so I was told)

I think my computer thinks it is a sausage... and all the links that work or don't work lately... maybe I'll tell it that if it doesn't shape up I send it to Jimmy Dean. Yeah, it's late.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #561 12/16 - 12/18/2006
Post by: Altruist on December 17, 2006, 05:35:41 AM
Yesterday a few people brought up the last name DIJKHOFF of the man that has been suspected as killing his 4 mo or 4 yr old child.

It made me think of the woman PVDS says that he spoke to at the bank 5/30/05, in my mind the name was Ruth DIJKHOFF.  Is this the correct name?  Anybody?

& then this morning when I was looking through the Official Statement Forum this name  MARGARITHA WERLEMAN e.v. DIJKHOFF made me think  -  Maybe Ruth is her nickname?

OT
I don't know, haven't been to bed yet as there was some trouble tonight as a drunk guy who an hour earlier I had had words with when he slammed the firedoor into my outside wall & I then saw him break the security lights in the interior corrider KNOCKED on my door.  Stupid me opened the door thinking he was going to apologize for horribly cursing at me when I said "NICE" right after he broke the light & when he told me to "suck his ****" I said NEVER, he turned around quickly & then approached me right up to my face saying "do I look like a n****r to you"  at which I continued to say the word NEVER over & over again.  I don't even think that word, never mind say it.  Have always hated it from the time I was a little girl of like 7.    NO, he wasn't there to apologize, he tried forcing his way into my condo, thank God I only had the door opened about 4 inches so I was able use my weight & shoulder to close & lock the door getting the sleeve of my bathrobe caught in the door.  I called the police.  They came to find this same guy about to urinate in the hallway near the front of the building.

So the Police arrested him & he resisted arrest after they had him handcuffed.  Resisting 2 police officers while handcuffed.  While one police officer was taking my statement his partner reported that the guy was trying to break one of the backwindows of the cruiser with his feet.

Man, I hate living alone.   Gonna have to go back to work so I can find a bigger place with 2 bathrooms & three bedrooms so I can get me a nice big guy as a room mate to live with me.  I'm a great room mate.  Sorry for the ramble.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #561 12/16 - 12/18/2006
Post by: IBE on December 17, 2006, 06:15:03 AM
Altruist

Just got back from reading Shango.

I am online if you wish to talk.

#1 I don't know the state you live in, but I hope it's Texas... go get a hand gun and a restraining order. I know some here will probably disagree here. Always yell "fire", more people listen.

Put those chains, locks on your doors... when you leave, leave a message on your machine where you are going or better yet, call a friend.

Get a cell phone pronto. even if it's the kind you pay a little on for just using for emergencies. A one with a camera would be neat...

Idon't know what size of town you live in, but I'd go talk to the police.. set up a contact there; might come in handy.

I am here, if you are

Love,

IBE

Rely on your intuition at all times... don't use anything that would block it... I know a good stiff drink would be nice... what I mean don't get poluted where you can let your guard down.

Can you have a dog at your apt?


Title: Lively Case Discussion #561 12/16 - 12/18/2006
Post by: Altruist on December 17, 2006, 06:24:37 AM
Hi IBE,  no dogs allowed only cats.  I will take that advice about the chain though.  It can only help.

Can't even figure out where this guy got drunk.  Have never seen him before.  Nobody claimed him other than a woman down at the front of the building came up to me to give me a hug & told me that he was a friend of her boyfriends but he hadn't been at their apartment but had just knocked & was told that they were in bed.  To say nothing of about 1:30 AM two guys broke beer bottles at the end of the stairs, pushed most of the glass under the stairs, blotted up the beer, put the carpet over the rest of the beer & went on their merry way.

Man, this place is not normally like this so it looks like trouble is here.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #561 12/16 - 12/18/2006
Post by: IBE on December 17, 2006, 06:26:50 AM
Altruist

Have lots of lights at the entrance of your condo

The man sounds as if is on meth or drugs by the action of kicking out the police car window.

Surround yourself with a protective white light and lots of prayer.

Are you good enough neighors with your neighbor that you can set up a code, like knocks on the wall? I know it sounds silly, but if he ever breaks in you could pound on the walls.

Also,it's not the reaction he would be expecting and in that second or 2 might give you time to head for the door.

Keep a baseball bat at each door, but hidden so to speak so you can get at it before he does and fight like HELL

I'd get a big dog; seems fasted than waiting on Mr. Right to come to the rescue.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #561 12/16 - 12/18/2006
Post by: IBE on December 17, 2006, 06:30:59 AM
Hi

I am sooo glad you are online.

Could be an after the fact of a full moon a week ago?? :lol:  :lol:

Take bells, you know like the ones on a sleigh... and put around each door know of the back door, front and you bedroom if you keep it close.

Please write back... I know this is OT, but we are the only ones here now... and all the world will know in few hours

I am slow at this sorry


Title: Lively Case Discussion #561 12/16 - 12/18/2006
Post by: Altruist on December 17, 2006, 06:31:37 AM
There are plenty of lights, I do always keep my bedroom door locked when I am in bed & I do keep a hammer in my bedroom as well.

I've lived here going on 10 years & I am safety conscious but the unit next to mine is vacant & I am on the end of the building, so no neighbors other than the ones above me & I don't know them other than they sound like they have manufacturing going on above my head with all the pounding they produce.  They have hard wood floors & have no consideration & then they brought in a dog without permission & told the Board that they needed the dog cuz the wife is depressed.  Man, she's about 26, what is there to be depressed about?  It's a lie I'm sure it's their practice child as with most newly weds.  LOL.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #561 12/16 - 12/18/2006
Post by: Altruist on December 17, 2006, 06:33:21 AM
We should move to ot in the forum.  KBM or whatever the initials doesn't seem to be using it anymore, OK?


Title: Lively Case Discussion #561 12/16 - 12/18/2006
Post by: IBE on December 17, 2006, 06:35:09 AM
Yeah and they don't have to change diapers!

Don't give a way where you live... but just answer one question.. do you live in LA... I could help in some way and I have a camper in storage if you ever need to hide out.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #561 12/16 - 12/18/2006
Post by: Altruist on December 17, 2006, 06:36:49 AM
IBE, please meet me in ot, it's about 1/2 way down on the first page of Natalee's forum.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #561 12/16 - 12/18/2006
Post by: IBE on December 17, 2006, 06:37:11 AM
What's Km whatever? and where do we go?


Title: Lively Case Discussion #561 12/16 - 12/18/2006
Post by: IBE on December 17, 2006, 06:38:42 AM
i'll try


Title: Terms
Post by: IBE on December 17, 2006, 07:41:27 AM
Was rereading Shango

Do the terms:

Dopple

Doppleganger

Occams Razor

Have any meanings that go with hackers, wi-fi, networks, computers, cell phone, bugging et al

I didn't read Marvel comics, do these terms relate to them?

Thanks  IBE

been researching on the Internet but can't make any sense


Title: Lively Case Discussion #561 12/16 - 12/18/2006
Post by: blah on December 17, 2006, 08:46:21 AM
a little hunor this morning....


http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=34-mz-wEHCs&NR



 :D


Title: Lively Case Discussion #561 12/16 - 12/18/2006
Post by: blah on December 17, 2006, 08:47:06 AM
humor


Title: Lively Case Discussion #561 12/16 - 12/18/2006
Post by: Lala'sMom on December 17, 2006, 09:35:44 AM
Morning monkeys!  Just playing catch up from last night.  Gosh! Altruist, you need to move sweetie.  Then again, there are bad people everywhere.  So glad you're okay.  

IBE, yes Shango talked about "singing birds".  So you are thinking computers, I have seen that referenced before.  Can't remember where, but I am sure there is a monkey somewhere that saved it.  I will look in all my Shango info and see if I can find it.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #561 12/16 - 12/18/2006
Post by: mishy on December 17, 2006, 09:36:49 AM
Cute, Blah  :lol:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #561 12/16 - 12/18/2006
Post by: Leslie on December 17, 2006, 09:40:20 AM
Quote from: Altruist
Yesterday a few people brought up the last name DIJKHOFF of the man that has been suspected as killing his 4 mo or 4 yr old child.
It made me think of the woman PVDS says that he spoke to at the bank 5/30/05, in my mind the name was Ruth DIJKHOFF.  Is this the correct name?  Anybody?
& then this morning when I was looking through the Official Statement Forum this name  MARGARITHA WERLEMAN e.v. DIJKHOFF made me think  -  Maybe Ruth is her nickname?
Yes, PVDS used Ruth Dijkhoff's name as a witness to his afternoon banking story, but we have no proof that it happened.  There is no declaration from this woman and on June 18, 2005 a Ruth Gisela Dijkhoff-Holtmann died at the age of 50.  Was her death from an illness,  an accident, foul play or suicide?  PVDS's witness statement from June 18th does not mention the banking story or this woman, but his June 23rd suspect statement does.  Notice the dates.  I am inclined to believe the woman who died was the same one who Paul named and that he knew she could never rebute his story.    MARGARITHA WERLEMAN e.v. DIJKHOFF (known as Rita) was the long-time VDS "maid" who was present at the house on May 30, 2005.   Because of my ignorance of the Aruban naming customs, I don't know what Rita or Ruth's maiden names were or if they were related.  Of course, Paul VDS would know if they were sisiters or sisters-in-law.  Dijkhoff is a common name in Aruba.  Another interesting fact re: the death of Ruth Dijkhoff is that her funeral arrangements were handled by the funeral home that Yolanda Wever co-owns and her funeral was in Germany.   Did her body or her ashes go to Germany?  Did that VDS maid go to the funeral in Germany and is that  why her declaration to the polis was delayed?   Now this young man, named Dijkhoff, is guilty of killing his infant daughter and it seems that drugs played a part in this crime.  I would love to see a family tree of the Dijkhoff family. Florida wrote that she has lots of information about this family.  Please email me at leslie@customtecfire.com if you do not want the information posted on the LCD.

OT
I don't know, haven't been to bed yet as there was some trouble tonight as a drunk guy who an hour earlier I had had words with when he slammed the firedoor into my outside wall & I then saw him break the security lights in the interior corrider KNOCKED on my door.  Stupid me opened the door thinking he was going to apologize for horribly cursing at me when I said "NICE" right after he broke the light & when he told me to "suck his ****" I said NEVER, he turned around quickly & then approached me right up to my face saying "do I look like a n****r to you"  at which I continued to say the word NEVER over & over again.  I don't even think that word, never mind say it.  Have always hated it from the time I was a little girl of like 7.    NO, he wasn't there to apologize, he tried forcing his way into my condo, thank God I only had the door opened about 4 inches so I was able use my weight & shoulder to close & lock the door getting the sleeve of my bathrobe caught in the door.  I called the police.  They came to find this same guy about to urinate in the hallway near the front of the building.
So the Police arrested him & he resisted arrest after they had him handcuffed.  Resisting 2 police officers while handcuffed.  While one police officer was taking my statement his partner reported that the guy was trying to break one of the backwindows of the cruiser with his feet.
Man, I hate living alone.   Gonna have to go back to work so I can find a bigger place with 2 bathrooms & three bedrooms so I can get me a nice big guy as a room mate to live with me.  I'm a great room mate.  Sorry for the ramble.
You were very lucky that you are not in the hospital or the morgue this morning.  Never open your door - even with a chain across it - because it can be easily booted.  It happened to me, years ago, when a drunk friend just wanted me to open my apt. door so he could talk to me and because I didn't want the neighbours upset,  I put the chain across and opened it only to have him kick the door in - frame and all - then pass out on my floor.  I wasn't standing behind the door as it came crashing down and he didn't hurt me, but I had nightmares for months after that.  I had to call the police, pay for the damages and move so this guy could never find me. Then, a few years later, I was living with a female roommate who broke up with her boyfriend and he came to our door,  drunk and demanding entry.  As I was telling her to not open the door, she told me not to worry because she was just going to tell him to go away and she was keeping the chain on anyway, I knew exactly what was bound to happen but she opened the door, he put his weight against it and as it came down on top of her, I fled out the back door to a friend's house and brought him and some other guys back to find her former boyfriend beating her up.  


Title: Lively Case Discussion #561 12/16 - 12/18/2006
Post by: Leslie on December 17, 2006, 09:52:54 AM
Singing birds and Shango: Maybe you mean "singing beetles"?

Simian Says: June 26th, 2005 at 3:10 pm
The last hope rests on the shoulders of the cowboys. Ten days, two down, eight to go.
The elder knows the passages in the palace too well. The Babylonians are afraid they might not be able to stop him.
Don’t shake the wire, ‘cause the bird will fly away.
-
Simian Says: June 26th, 2005 at 4:04 pm
The wire has been shaken. The bird has left.
-
Shango Says: June 26th, 2005 at 4:14 pm
Simian your Dopple has resumed position
Bird on the wire
-
Simian Says: June 26th, 2005 at 9:27 pm
The elder had to come clean. He knows what damaged he had caused. The Simian said to not shake the wire, ‘cause the bird would fly away.
-
Shango Says: June 26th, 2005 at 11:12 pm
Even Flying Birds Sing
-

Shango Says: June 26th, 2005 at 4:16 pm
You must remember
The Arawaks placed singing beetles with the Babylonian and the two Shivas
They were never alone
-
Hope this helps


Title: Lively Case Discussion #561 12/16 - 12/18/2006
Post by: LilPuma on December 17, 2006, 10:45:24 AM
Quote from: "crazybabyborg"
Quote from: "Lala'sMom"
I didn't know that Deepak talked to Beth and told her anything.  It was my impression the only person she ever spoke to was Joran. Did I miss something?


Lala's. I don't know if Deepak said anything to her, but Beth went to the internet Cafe while Deepak was working, and stood in front of him and talked to him. Greta ( I think?) caught it on film. Beth said she tried to tempt him the reward money, and tried to appeal to him as a Mother of a missing child. He looked very, very, uncomfortable and reluctant to look at her.


It was an NBC cameraman that Beth happened upon on their way there.  She told him what she was doing and asked him if he wanted to some along.  He had the camera hidden inside a newspaper or something as he moved around the cafe trying to be inconspicuous.  Thus there was no sound.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #561 12/16 - 12/18/2006
Post by: Ono on December 17, 2006, 10:53:02 AM
Quote from: "Kat_Gram"
In Aruba, I don't know if they have to keep extending their visas but you never want to be out of country when thing lapses either. That might be why he didn't come here before. Can't apply for a continuation if you are not there.
Does anyone know how much Fox paid Joran for the fluffy thing with Greta ?
As for lawyers on these shows, ask 10 of them the same question, get 10 answers that are different.
Solution : Never ask a lawyer a question.
Deepak also broke the rule that if someone offers you $$$$$$$ cash for something, you take it.  Even more so if what you have to offer has a shelf life. He wanted more than 4 million for his story, give me a break.


Kat_Gram:
I have heard FOX state that they do not pay for interviews.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #561 12/16 - 12/18/2006
Post by: nonesuche on December 17, 2006, 10:57:07 AM
Good morning all-

I've been keeping up when I can, interesting discussions as always, I hope to be back in force soon. Altruist I heard from my own mother who is an avid gardener, that a man just showed up asking for food and money in her backyard <safe nice area too>, last Sunday? She was so startled she told him what was in her refrigerator and he responded by saying he wanted to know what was in her purse, so she told him she would go get it for him and smiled then ran inside locking the doors and hit the burglar alarm making the siren sound off, and he went running.

You can't take any chances in this day and age, not a one. Please be careful !

I find it fascinating to see all these bits and pieces come together post all the recent news, and it all points toward such a subversive environment on Aruba, where criminals can both thrive and hide like cockroaches. Oduber and Croes aren't leaders, they herd the criminals and likely on the take, both of them.

Keep up the good work monkeys, I feel Kimberly on the Line-Up surely isn't swallowing one more lie out of Aruba or nastiness from Joe T either !


Title: Lively Case Discussion #561 12/16 - 12/18/2006
Post by: Kat_Gram on December 17, 2006, 11:13:11 AM
Quote from: "spooky112483"
Quote from: "Altruist"
Quote from: "Lala'sMom"
Would some really smart monkey please review the Skeeters tape that Klaas left for us from Roger at Scrux and tell me where the comment about Natalee  dressing like a slut is located?  I seem to have missed it and I have read it several times...it must be my eyes. TIA


It isn't there Lala'sMom.  Think that Klaas thought she copied it all but it was obviously at capacity of her copy ability so it was cut off.  I will see if I can copy it from that point.


I am several pages behind but I have to say...ya'll really believe Rogers transcript???!!
First of all I dont trust Roger but giving him the benefit of the doubt he was given the ARUBAN VERSION of the tape...imo the ALTERED BY ARUBA VERSION of the tape....no we dont have the transcipts from the ORIGINAL TRUE SKEETERS tape, that has not been given out to us on the internet.
DO NOT believe the Rogers/Aruban version transcript....
gees,especially if it does not contain the deepak "slut" ramblings because WE ALL HEARD IT on EVERY MSM program when it came out :!:  :roll:

I went over to roger's and it is in eleven parts and the s*&^ is still there. As for the other, No, I would not believe anything I read on the net in regards to that. Too many copies. Jossy has a tape where Dompig speaks to him where this is confirmed, about all three of them.
There are certified true copies of the tape. Dave Holloway mentioned that he has one. As for the other, I do not even know who roger was, is
and what he was all about. I take most things with a grain of salt as far as some of the information that is presented on this case.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #561 12/16 - 12/18/2006
Post by: Florida on December 17, 2006, 11:14:04 AM
Leslie:

RUTH DIJKHOFF-HOLTMAN (Holtman is her maiden name)

MARGARITHA WERLEMAN e.v. DIJKHOFF (known as Rita)
(Dijkhoff is her maiden name...
FWIW: Werleman's own the Lighthouse Restaurant and hotels)


Title: Lively Case Discussion #561 12/16 - 12/18/2006
Post by: Ono on December 17, 2006, 11:15:32 AM
Quote from: "crazybabyborg"
Quote from: "Carnut"
O/T, Wooowee!! ROTFLMAO!!!!!!

Just watched a Pet Shop commercial with a bunch of cute little puppie hopping around on christmas decorations.

Advertisement to get puppies for Christmas, then the statement that floored me, I know what they mean't but it really caught me a funny way.

'3 year warranty' on all puppies.

ROTFLMAO!!!!!


Well, since you're laughing too, I was just sent this card. It "sleighed" me!  :lol:  :lol:  :lol:
 http://www.thecompassgroup.biz/merryxmas.swf


 :D That is adorable!


Title: Lively Case Discussion #561 12/16 - 12/18/2006
Post by: Florida on December 17, 2006, 11:16:57 AM
Adding:  Roberto Dijkhoff is the Bank Manager

Could Ruth Dijkhoff work at the bank?
Did Paulus need to withdraw "big" or needed a loan?


Title: Lively Case Discussion #561 12/16 - 12/18/2006
Post by: Katysmom on December 17, 2006, 11:22:05 AM
Quote from: "Florida"
Leslie:

RUTH DIJKHOFF-HOLTMAN (Holtman is her maiden name)

MARGARITHA WERLEMAN e.v. DIJKHOFF (known as Rita)
(Dijkhoff is her maiden name...
FWIW: Werleman's own the Lighthouse Restaurant and hotels)


too much inbreeding on that island to keep up with it all


Title: Lively Case Discussion #561 12/16 - 12/18/2006
Post by: Kat_Gram on December 17, 2006, 11:23:43 AM
If Paulus is saying he was at the bank, he wasn't at the bank.
As for the racist comment by Deepak, Joran, another fine upstanding
truthteller, it came out later that Joran made up some lies  ! ! !
to wind Deepak up.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #561 12/16 - 12/18/2006
Post by: Anna on December 17, 2006, 11:25:59 AM
(http://i15.photobucket.com/albums/a360/AnnaBlueSkies/Greetings/Morning%20Aft%20Evening/thhhgfh5656-1.jpg)


Good Morning, Monkeys,

Have been busy reading all the posts and comments and had just a few random thoughts to share this morning.

Testimony is given in court, depositions taken out of court.  So will the Plaintiffs in the Dr. Phil case be required to give testimony in person?  I would think other parties involved might be allowed to submit depositions only but surely the plaintiffs must appear in person?  This would vary by state and have no idea what California says in this regard.

Even if Beth is not present, it is going to be difficult to find twelve people in the jury pool, usually taken from registered voters, who have not seen her face.  Compare and contrast with Ratface Boys.  No contest.  I hear Nadira behind all of this pushing, pushing, pushing just as she did for demanding the apology from Beth.  Remember that?  They made Beth apologize for calling those criminals criminals or else they would stop the investigation and even demonstrated in the streets AGAINST the mother of the missing Natalee.  They can't find it in their warped hearts to demonstrate FOR her but did against her.

Don't cry for me, Argentina!

And while juries in that area have been known to side with the bad guys in the past, that was not with Dr. Phil participating in their selection.  This is what he was doing professionally when he met Oprah.  Remember when the buffoons of the Dark Side said she would fire him over this?  Brahahahaha!!  He makes her $50 mil a year and I dare say this is more than any other considerations she might have in this regard.

I also think Greta was truly miffed that Beth went to the Internet Cafe with another network and that seemed to be a cooling off point between them.  No proof of that, just my perception or over active imagination, whichever you chose to think.

But warped mindset of those on Aruba who see black as white and up as down are behind this.  I still fail to grasp how they think or why they think as they do as it is contrary to all logic and just unfathomable.

And do keep in mind that that transcript as Spooky pointed out is by Roger and the Church ladies so I just can't trust it as I am sure Deepak was given every consideration possible throughout.  Skeeters is a professional at what he does and while his questioning techniques may seem rather flawed, I think he was putting Deepak at ease more than anything, making Deepak think this was not being recorded despite having been told that Skeeters reserved the right to do so at any time.

I think the tape is claimed to have come from ALE and that is the one which sounds funny.  Not like the one played by Skeeters on TV.


We have yet to see any of the computer or cell phone records for Deepak for the night of Natalee's disappearance, right?  Without those, it is difficult to assess much as far as the alleged communications.  When I have time, I will look for Joran also saying they made lots of chatter was his word.  And then recall the virus entered the Sloot computer very timely that night and is was allegedly flooded with other stuff per the report?  What other stuff?  Was it the transmission of an eight and a half minute video of something or other?

Just random thoughts. . . . .


.




(http://i15.photobucket.com/albums/a360/AnnaBlueSkies/Greetings/Holidays/th3pc_holly_family_L.jpg)


Title: Lively Case Discussion #561 12/16 - 12/18/2006
Post by: Ono on December 17, 2006, 11:26:58 AM
Quote from: "Lala'sMom"
Oh and one more thing...Deepak... you are the one that made your life miserable by not helping Natalee when she was in distress.  You could have prevented this by just taking her back to the hotel like she thought you were doing.  You had the power to put her out of that car when you were on the corner and her friends were there.  Whether she was drunk or drugged, all you had to do was leave her with her friends...instead you let Joran make the call.  Now, Joran will let you and Satish pay the price.


Yes, I also think the Kalpews are going to be the "fall guys"...you could hear it again in what Tacky Joe said last night to Kimberly, when he emphasized that the New York lawsuit against Joran did not include wrongful death. Goodbye Kalpews! You are getting the blame.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #561 12/16 - 12/18/2006
Post by: Kat_Gram on December 17, 2006, 11:32:15 AM
About three years ago, I had some problems outside where I live.
The complex has security and then they got a new security company. One where the guy does not spend all his time sleeping in the front foyer.
I got a security system with a panic button.
The sytem was just $ 400.00  for the front door. And it's 18.00 a month for the monitoring.
ps it works. The maintenance guy set it off one day when I was at work.
..
I am more careful when coming in the building now from the shopping centre this complex is connected to. Always have my security card in hand and if anyone is around that I don't know, I just dawdle in the public area.
..
Victim's services here sent me quite a bit of literature about safety. I certainly had become complacent.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #561 12/16 - 12/18/2006
Post by: Ono on December 17, 2006, 11:32:57 AM
Quote from: "Carnut"
Quote from: "Lala'sMom"
Oh and one more thing...Deepak... you are the one that made your life miserable by not helping Natalee when she was in distress.  You could have prevented this by just taking her back to the hotel like she thought you were doing.  You had the power to put her out of that car when you were on the corner and her friends were there.  Whether she was drunk or drugged, all you had to do was leave her with her friends...instead you let Joran make the call.  Now, Joran will let you and Satish pay the price.


Also just another example of how these folks all seem to see the world upside down or inside out or something.

There's gotta be something wrong with those folks.


The poison drop in the Aruban legal system is the failure to punish perjury...(plus no juries), especially in criminal cases. But the acceptance of lying, even in court, sets the stage for the rest of their civil society and everyday life. It is ludicrious. What is the use of the judicial system in a criminal case in a place such as that? Null & void. They may as well just concentrate on corporate law.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #561 12/16 - 12/18/2006
Post by: Katysmom on December 17, 2006, 11:38:39 AM
Quote from: "Ono"
Quote from: "Carnut"
Quote from: "Lala'sMom"
Oh and one more thing...Deepak... you are the one that made your life miserable by not helping Natalee when she was in distress.  You could have prevented this by just taking her back to the hotel like she thought you were doing.  You had the power to put her out of that car when you were on the corner and her friends were there.  Whether she was drunk or drugged, all you had to do was leave her with her friends...instead you let Joran make the call.  Now, Joran will let you and Satish pay the price.


Also just another example of how these folks all seem to see the world upside down or inside out or something.

There's gotta be something wrong with those folks.


The poison drop in the Aruban legal system is the failure to punish perjury...(plus no juries), especially in criminal cases. But the acceptance of lying, even in court, sets the stage for the rest of their civil society and everyday life. It is ludicrious. What is the use of the judicial system in a criminal case in a place such as that? Null & void. They may as well just concentrate on corporate law.


I agree with you completely, Ono.  The lies flow like water around there and no one is called on it.  I'd like to know why the two black security guards have not sued.  Now, if anyone deserves to win a lawsuit for false imprisionment, it's those two.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #561 12/16 - 12/18/2006
Post by: Kat_Gram on December 17, 2006, 11:39:09 AM
from Anna ;
We have yet to see any of the computer or cell phone records for Deepak for the night of Natalee's disappearance, right? Without those, it is difficult to assess much as far as the alleged communications.
..
We have Joran's and there are several messages on Joran's computer
from Deepak. There is a cluster all sent at almost the same time.
Deepak was the sender, he inititated the chatter at that time.
..
I really can't see Dr. Phil or Skeeters pulling a stunt like that. Altering a part of a tape.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #561 12/16 - 12/18/2006
Post by: Ono on December 17, 2006, 11:39:59 AM
Quote from: "crazybabyborg"
Quote from: "Lala'sMom"
I didn't know that Deepak talked to Beth and told her anything.  It was my impression the only person she ever spoke to was Joran. Did I miss something?


Lala's. I don't know if Deepak said anything to her, but Beth went to the internet Cafe while Deepak was working, and stood in front of him and talked to him. Greta ( I think?) caught it on film. Beth said she tried to tempt him the reward money, and tried to appeal to him as a Mother of a missing child. He looked very, very, uncomfortable and reluctant to look at her.


And then ran and called his attorney.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #561 12/16 - 12/18/2006
Post by: Kat_Gram on December 17, 2006, 11:44:23 AM
On that tape, Deepak says that if he knew where the body was, he would tell.
I think he would too.
It's hard to determine if Deepak could have anything worthwhile in that regard.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #561 12/16 - 12/18/2006
Post by: Anna on December 17, 2006, 11:44:48 AM
.
Greta has stated that there was no book or movie deal with Deepak at all for the $4.5 million he alleges.  This is just a total lie on his part.  Perhaps he thinks it is a bargaining chip of some sort.  Perhaps he does not even know she had been on national TV saying there was never any such deal at all.

The fact that Aruba gets so little of the media coverage we see seems to further distort their vision of events.

Also, those doing that lame examination of the Sloot computers appear to throw in the towel when the alleged virus enters the picture and they do not even list the "flood" or what it consists of or anything more in that regard.  That is one sorry excuse for an analysis.  All they did was list what was left on the hard drive after the Sloots deleted what they did not want seen.

Anyone could do that.  Hardly expert analysis and NOT from NFI.

.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #561 12/16 - 12/18/2006
Post by: Anna on December 17, 2006, 11:50:29 AM
Quote from: "Kat_Gram"
On that tape, Deepak says that if he knew where the body was, he would tell.
I think he would too.
It's hard to determine if Deepak could have anything worthwhile in that regard.



Or on the other hand, he could tell where HE left it last, before it was retrieved by other parties and moved again.

Kelpoes are really putting themselves in a bad position as we did see from Tacky Joe last night on LineUp.

He seemed just delighted with their recent behavior and the further separating of them from Joran.  That seems to be the strategy.  Distance Joran as far as possible from the Kelpoes.  Then hang them out to dry for it all.  And their greed is causing them to fall right in line with this scheme.

But then in a way, they are lucky nothing "bad" has happened to them for that would certainly make it all easier.  It is their own associates in Aruba whom they should fear, not anyone in the U.S.  I would watch my back all the time if I were in their shoes.


(http://i15.photobucket.com/albums/a360/AnnaBlueSkies/Greetings/ththaccident.jpg)


Title: Lively Case Discussion #561 12/16 - 12/18/2006
Post by: Ono on December 17, 2006, 11:50:54 AM
Quote from: "blah"
a little hunor this morning....


http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=34-mz-wEHCs&NR



 :D


ROTFL! :lol:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #561 12/16 - 12/18/2006
Post by: Kat_Gram on December 17, 2006, 11:52:05 AM
I did not know Greta had said that about the cash thing.
Going to get a tv guide today to see if Phil is on later where I live.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #561 12/16 - 12/18/2006
Post by: Katysmom on December 17, 2006, 11:55:08 AM
Quote from: "Kat_Gram"
I did not know Greta had said that about the cash thing.
Going to get a tv guide today to see if Phil is on later where I live.


I believe she said that all they pay for are transportation and hotel costs.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #561 12/16 - 12/18/2006
Post by: Kat_Gram on December 17, 2006, 11:59:03 AM
No matter which way you look at it... various outcomes, yes the Kalpoes are in the worst position. Strategy wise. And money wise at the end of the day.
They must have persons in Aruba or elsewhere who have been encouraging them to file the lawsuit.
Personally, I think the kaploe Bros are headed back to Surinam.
And not by choice.
If the Kalpoes had anything substantive to nail Joran, I think it would have been done. Probably what they have is he said, then I said, and because they have lied so much it reduces it to worthless.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #561 12/16 - 12/18/2006
Post by: blah on December 17, 2006, 12:02:11 PM
anyones firewall reporting inbound attempts from these IP addresses in the last hour or so??

64.15.124.85  
64.14.56.77


Title: Lively Case Discussion #561 12/16 - 12/18/2006
Post by: Ono on December 17, 2006, 12:03:05 PM
Quote from: "Katysmom"
Quote from: "Ono"
Quote from: "Carnut"
Quote from: "Lala'sMom"
Oh and one more thing...Deepak... you are the one that made your life miserable by not helping Natalee when she was in distress.  You could have prevented this by just taking her back to the hotel like she thought you were doing.  You had the power to put her out of that car when you were on the corner and her friends were there.  Whether she was drunk or drugged, all you had to do was leave her with her friends...instead you let Joran make the call.  Now, Joran will let you and Satish pay the price.


Also just another example of how these folks all seem to see the world upside down or inside out or something.

There's gotta be something wrong with those folks.


The poison drop in the Aruban legal system is the failure to punish perjury...(plus no juries), especially in criminal cases. But the acceptance of lying, even in court, sets the stage for the rest of their civil society and everyday life. It is ludicrious. What is the use of the judicial system in a criminal case in a place such as that? Null & void. They may as well just concentrate on corporate law.


I agree with you completely, Ono.  The lies flow like water around there and no one is called on it.  I'd like to know why the two black security guards have not sued.  Now, if anyone deserves to win a lawsuit for false imprisionment, it's those two.


Yes, they certainly have grounds. I am thinking they must be afraid for their lives. No genuine law & order there, IMO.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #561 12/16 - 12/18/2006
Post by: Katysmom on December 17, 2006, 12:04:04 PM
Quote from: "blah"
anyones firewall reporting inbound attempts from these IP addresses in the last hour or so??

64.15.124.85  
64.14.56.77


64.15.124.85 is comeing from youtube


Title: Lively Case Discussion #561 12/16 - 12/18/2006
Post by: Ono on December 17, 2006, 12:05:26 PM
Quote from: "Kat_Gram"
On that tape, Deepak says that if he knew where the body was, he would tell.
I think he would too.
It's hard to determine if Deepak could have anything worthwhile in that regard.


In that one statement alone, he is in fact, acknowledging that there is a body.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #561 12/16 - 12/18/2006
Post by: Katysmom on December 17, 2006, 12:06:03 PM
Quote from: "Katysmom"
Quote from: "blah"
anyones firewall reporting inbound attempts from these IP addresses in the last hour or so??

64.15.124.85  
64.14.56.77


64.15.124.85 is comeing from youtube


64.14.56.77 is comeing from savvis.net


Title: Lively Case Discussion #561 12/16 - 12/18/2006
Post by: blah on December 17, 2006, 12:06:22 PM
Quote from: "Katysmom"
Quote from: "blah"
anyones firewall reporting inbound attempts from these IP addresses in the last hour or so??

64.15.124.85  
64.14.56.77


64.15.124.85 is comeing from youtube


can you find anything on the other, one? I havent been able to...


Title: Lively Case Discussion #561 12/16 - 12/18/2006
Post by: Kat_Gram on December 17, 2006, 12:06:41 PM
Quote from: "blah"
anyones firewall reporting inbound attempts from these IP addresses in the last hour or so??

64.15.124.85  
64.14.56.77

where would I get a report like that ?


Title: Lively Case Discussion #561 12/16 - 12/18/2006
Post by: Katysmom on December 17, 2006, 12:08:27 PM
Quote from: "Kat_Gram"
Quote from: "blah"
anyones firewall reporting inbound attempts from these IP addresses in the last hour or so??

64.15.124.85  
64.14.56.77

where would I get a report like that ?


http://www.whois.sc/


Title: Lively Case Discussion #561 12/16 - 12/18/2006
Post by: klaasend on December 17, 2006, 12:08:48 PM
Quote from: "blah"
anyones firewall reporting inbound attempts from these IP addresses in the last hour or so??

64.15.124.85  
64.14.56.77


64.15.124.85

OrgName:    YouTube, Inc.
OrgID:      YOUTU
Address:    71 E Third Ave
Address:    2nd Floor
City:       San Mateo
StateProv:  CA
PostalCode: 94401
Country:    US

NetRange:   64.15.112.0 - 64.15.127.255
CIDR:       64.15.112.0/20
NetName:    YOUTUBE2
NetHandle:  NET-64-15-112-0-1
Parent:     NET-64-0-0-0-0
NetType:    Direct Assignment
NameServer: NS1.SJL.YOUTUBE.COM
NameServer: NS2.SJL.YOUTUBE.COM
Comment:    
RegDate:    2006-05-23
Updated:    2006-05-23

RTechHandle: NETWO1084-ARIN
RTechName:   networkradbaccount
RTechPhone:  +1-650-343-2960
RTechEmail:  ****@youtube.com

OrgTechHandle: NETWO1084-ARIN
OrgTechName:   networkradbaccount
OrgTechPhone:  +1-650-343-2960
OrgTechEmail:  ****@youtube.com


Title: Lively Case Discussion #561 12/16 - 12/18/2006
Post by: blah on December 17, 2006, 12:09:06 PM
Quote from: "Kat_Gram"
Quote from: "blah"
anyones firewall reporting inbound attempts from these IP addresses in the last hour or so??

64.15.124.85  
64.14.56.77

where would I get a report like that ?


do you have a firewall program running?  You should be able to view reports on it if you do


Title: Lively Case Discussion #561 12/16 - 12/18/2006
Post by: Ono on December 17, 2006, 12:10:03 PM
Quote from: "Katysmom"
Quote from: "Kat_Gram"
I did not know Greta had said that about the cash thing.
Going to get a tv guide today to see if Phil is on later where I live.


I believe she said that all they pay for are transportation and hotel costs.


Yes, when all this dis-information came up months ago regarding FOX paying for interviews....No payment whatsoever for interviews, period...just expenses.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #561 12/16 - 12/18/2006
Post by: blah on December 17, 2006, 12:12:27 PM
Quote from: "Katysmom"
Quote from: "Kat_Gram"
Quote from: "blah"
anyones firewall reporting inbound attempts from these IP addresses in the last hour or so??

64.15.124.85  
64.14.56.77

where would I get a report like that ?


http://www.whois.sc/


I use this site...
http://www.arin.net/whois/

and it wouldnt show any information for eithe one of those adresses earlier but now it does.  Weird

I reported both of them just for the hell of it anyhow :wink:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #561 12/16 - 12/18/2006
Post by: Anna on December 17, 2006, 12:13:12 PM
O/T

I made a folder to my Desktop for Cookies.  Then in between posts here or other places, I manually go through and delete the ones I don't like.  This way I don't have to dump all of them including the ones I want to keep.  Time consuming but sometimes I have time just waiting to see if there will be any more posts and this puts that to use.

Then other times, if I want to, I can just dump the whole bunch of them.


(http://i15.photobucket.com/albums/a360/AnnaBlueSkies/Greetings/Holidays/2csflw7_th.jpg)

.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #561 12/16 - 12/18/2006
Post by: blah on December 17, 2006, 12:20:07 PM
Quote from: "Anna"
O/T

I made a folder to my Desktop for Cookies.  Then in between posts here or other places, I manually go through and delete the ones I don't like.  This way I don't have to dump all of them including the ones I want to keep.  Time consuming but sometimes I have time just waiting to see if there will be any more posts and this puts that to use.

Then other times, if I want to, I can just dump the whole bunch of them.


(http://i15.photobucket.com/albums/a360/AnnaBlueSkies/Greetings/Holidays/2csflw7_th.jpg)

.


I reject ALL cookies and go ahead and give permission to a website only if I trust the site and only when I need to use their cookies for some purpose (such as a shopping cart or whatever)  Some websites will not work at all without putting a cookie on your computer.  Thats fine, I dont need to go to their site anyhow if they require putting a cookie on your computer just to look at their page.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #561 12/16 - 12/18/2006
Post by: Tylergal on December 17, 2006, 12:25:07 PM
Quote from: "Kat_Gram"
No matter which way you look at it... various outcomes, yes the Kalpoes are in the worst position. Strategy wise. And money wise at the end of the day.
They must have persons in Aruba or elsewhere who have been encouraging them to file the lawsuit.
Personally, I think the kaploe Bros are headed back to Surinam.
And not by choice.
If the Kalpoes had anything substantive to nail Joran, I think it would have been done. Probably what they have is he said, then I said, and because they have lied so much it reduces it to worthless.


Just my 2-cents worth which is worth less, probably.

I think the Kalpoe's had movies or videos of Natalee in a compromised position that would be worrisome for them but detrimental to Joran's future.  I think the meeting by the pool that night was where Paul coerced the K2 into believing they were more at fault (1) secondary to Deepak's age, (2) secondary to Deepak being the driver of the vehicle, (3) secondary to Paulus making Deepak believe the world would see him as the perpetrator since Joran was "only having sex with a drugged Natalee and it would probably turn out that Deepak was responsible for drugging her (which he might have been ).  (4) I think that Paulus gave the Deepak family the money to buy the Internet cafe for release of the video his custody (a blackmail of sorts).  (5) I believe that there was a conscienciuos effort from day #1 failing this case "going away," to pin it totally on the Kalpoes by Paulus and his minions, (6) I believe the computer virus was "installed" by the Internet Cafe to make the transmission of the video go away, (7) I think the bank lady died secondary to questionable reasons.  (8) I think the beheaded guy might have been the bifrons.  (9) I think the guy who was burned up in the cave was in possession of a lot of information and was about to go public with it. (10) I think the Chicago and New Jersey mobsters are involved with Paulus and are protecting his satanic offspring in order to protect him.  (10) I think Anita is the conduit for all the machinations.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #561 12/16 - 12/18/2006
Post by: blah on December 17, 2006, 12:28:22 PM
sorry, i didnt mean to derail the conversation


Title: Will Deepak and Satish be allowed in the US?
Post by: Leslie on December 17, 2006, 12:32:36 PM
It's not that easy getting into the United States as you might think.  One of the questions the border guards might ask is  "have you ever been arrested?"  Back in 1995, I was with a two other people on Boxing day trying to make a day trip into New York state from Ontario and we were turned back at the border but not till after the car was searched (with a dog) and we were searched.  All because one person in our trio had been arrested years before.  While we were waiting in customs, a carload of young people had been pulled over and trooped in to say they were planning on going skiing in the States.   The border guard asked them how much US money they had on them and their answer wasn't good enough for him and they were denied entry.  
Even a plane ticket doesn't guarantee entrance.  One time, prior to 9/11,
my husband and I were at the Montreal airport on our way to Florida and
US customs kept him for so long it looked like it was going to be a solo trip for me. We barely made the flight.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #561 12/16 - 12/18/2006
Post by: Kat_Gram on December 17, 2006, 12:34:57 PM
I agree with most of what you said Tyler. There was something in it for the Kalpoes and PVDS getting them a lawyer  - Mr. Ooman is very in line with PVDS convincing them to stick together and to not change their story about the HI lie. He did not want Junior to be known to be the last person alone with Natalee.
The rumors and what was posted early about Natalee running away before were as far as I can tell surfaced from ppl who claimed to be from Aruba posting at RWV on June 5th, 2005. Who do you think was behind all of that ? I would say Joran, Deepak, Satish and all their Pimp buddies. Directed by Paulus.


Title: Re: Will Deepak and Satish be allowed in the US?
Post by: blah on December 17, 2006, 12:36:31 PM
Quote from: "Leslie"
It's not that easy getting into the United States as you might think.  One of the questions the border guards might ask is  "have you ever been arrested?"  Back in 1995, I was with a two other people on Boxing day trying to make a day trip into New York state from Ontario and we were turned back at the border but not till after the car was searched (with a dog) and we were searched.  All because one person in our trio had been arrested years before.  While we were waiting in customs, a carload of young people had been pulled over and trooped in to say they were planning on going skiing in the States.   The border guard asked them how much US money they had on them and their answer wasn't good enough for him and they were denied entry.  
Even a plane ticket doesn't guarantee entrance.  One time, prior to 9/11,
my husband and I were at the Montreal airport on our way to Florida and
US customs kept him for so long it looked like it was going to be a solo trip for me. We barely made the flight.


next time come through Windsor/Detroit, they let everyone through no problem.    :lol:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #561 12/16 - 12/18/2006
Post by: Leslie on December 17, 2006, 12:41:22 PM
Tyler:  How about adding to your #3.  Paul and Joran convinced Deepak and Satish that Natalee was a "racist" and she would never have consented to any sexual activity with them, whereas she would have done so willingly with Joran.  
P.S.  Thanks for your kind words in your post about how we all contribute what we can, depending on our abilities and it adds up to great teamwork.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #561 12/16 - 12/18/2006
Post by: Florida on December 17, 2006, 12:42:04 PM
TYLERGIRL:  I think you are right.....

I think Paulus talked the Kalpoes into "we all participated"
I think Paulus told them to tell as many stories as possible...
to confuse the facts
I think all the men in Aruba have "ammuntion" on each other

From the taped police car conversation:
The Kalpoes are calm, sure of themselves, finally figured out what happened that night.
It's Joran who is angry, confused,
"If you don't know what happened; then nothing happened"


Title: Re: Will Deepak and Satish be allowed in the US?
Post by: Kat_Gram on December 17, 2006, 12:45:28 PM
Quote from: "Leslie"
It's not that easy getting into the United States as you might think.  One of the questions the border guards might ask is  "have you ever been arrested?"  Back in 1995, I was with a two other people on Boxing day trying to make a day trip into New York state from Ontario and we were turned back at the border but not till after the car was searched (with a dog) and we were searched.  All because one person in our trio had been arrested years before.  While we were waiting in customs, a carload of young people had been pulled over and trooped in to say they were planning on going skiing in the States.   The border guard asked them how much US money they had on them and their answer wasn't good enough for him and they were denied entry.  
Even a plane ticket doesn't guarantee entrance.  One time, prior to 9/11,
my husband and I were at the Montreal airport on our way to Florida and
US customs kept him for so long it looked like it was going to be a solo trip for me. We barely made the flight.

Last year, I crossed with ppl who were not Canadian citizens. I will never go with them again. Fingerprints were required from them. Lots of anxiety.
Over an hour while they checked them out. One of the guys had been within the past year back in Europe on a honeymoon trip and had been everywhere. They were very interested in him.
His Mother thought it was because they were German Nationals and the US has long memories.
Border guards had guns. Looked ex- marine. No sense of humor I suspected.
I have id from where I work that is backed up with an RCMP vetted security clearance so to be held up was an anxiety producing hour. We were just so wigged out, we had to go and calm down at the first available food stop.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #561 12/16 - 12/18/2006
Post by: Florida on December 17, 2006, 12:47:44 PM
Leslie:  "You Got Mail...."

(Grab a cup of coffee..it's a long one!)


Title: Lively Case Discussion #561 12/16 - 12/18/2006
Post by: Leslie on December 17, 2006, 12:49:17 PM
Blah:  Leaving Quebec too.  The border quards asks :
1. Where were you born?
2. Where do you live?
3. What is the purpose of your visit to the US?
4. How long will you be staying?
Have a nice trip...


Title: Lively Case Discussion #561 12/16 - 12/18/2006
Post by: Florida on December 17, 2006, 12:53:49 PM
Would anyone know which Ari-bay video
shows the inside of the Tattoo? TIA!


Title: Lively Case Discussion #561 12/16 - 12/18/2006
Post by: BTgirl on December 17, 2006, 12:54:15 PM
Quote from: "Leslie"
Blah:  Leaving Quebec too.  The border quards asks :
1. Where were you born?
2. Where do you live?
3. What is the purpose of your visit to the US?
4. How long will you be staying?
Have a nice trip...


It's much easier coming from Mexico. I have clients who tell me they're here illegally, going home to Mexico for Christmas, and will be coming back into the country illegally once Christmas is over. It happens every year, and it works for them without a hitch.  :shock:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #561 12/16 - 12/18/2006
Post by: blah on December 17, 2006, 12:56:12 PM
Quote from: "Leslie"
Blah:  Leaving Quebec too.  The border quards asks :
1. Where were you born?
2. Where do you live?
3. What is the purpose of your visit to the US?
4. How long will you be staying?
Have a nice trip...


thats the exact same questions they ask here and I'm pretty sure they dont even listen to the answers  :lol:  :lol:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #561 12/16 - 12/18/2006
Post by: robots on December 17, 2006, 12:57:09 PM
here is the BOTTOM LINE

Joran did not get rid of the body by himself

so what we have is more than 1 PERSON that knows what happened  


when more than 1 person knows, all are nervous
because they never know when the SNEAKER will drop  :twisted:


it is coming...slowly but surely

never a doubt


Title: Lively Case Discussion #561 12/16 - 12/18/2006
Post by: Sue on December 17, 2006, 01:00:25 PM

I have been trying to read through Kalpoe lawsuit..
Looks like they forgot to add Allison Dubios to there lawsuit
I mean hell she came and said they were guilty and Paul also



Title: Lively Case Discussion #561 12/16 - 12/18/2006
Post by: Kat_Gram on December 17, 2006, 01:00:40 PM
What if the person is your Dad and his buddy ?
They aren't going to admit to complicity.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #561 12/16 - 12/18/2006
Post by: klaasend on December 17, 2006, 01:01:05 PM
Quote from: "Florida"
Would anyone know which Ari-bay video
shows the inside of the Tattoo? TIA!


They were uploaded in April 2005:

http://www.aru-bay.com/images/smallmovie5.mov
http://www.aru-bay.com/images/smallmovie6.mov


Title: Lively Case Discussion #561 12/16 - 12/18/2006
Post by: Leslie on December 17, 2006, 01:10:57 PM
Florida:  I was trying to respond to your email but it froze my Outlook!  I guess I should not have clicked on reply to email!  I will go over to Outlook Express and answer you.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #561 12/16 - 12/18/2006
Post by: Florida on December 17, 2006, 01:11:33 PM
Thanks, Klaas!


Title: Lively Case Discussion #561 12/16 - 12/18/2006
Post by: Kat_Gram on December 17, 2006, 01:23:08 PM
Maybe on the way out the door from Aruba to Surinam , luggage in hand in the garbage bags, Deepak will " remember" the conversations with Paulus. When he has nothing to lose. If they don't lay any charges by May or June of 2007, then he is almost home free on any lesser charges, isn't he ?
It will be a long time before the Deepak suit goes forward. And there certainly will be alot of blather and mis statement of fact on the networks. Like the former suspect thing.
I am pinning my hopes on Devries. And Jossy. The American Networks
are too concened with the ' entertainment ' value of a program. And sound bites.  
Did I miss any true investigative reporting on this case by Americans ?


Title: Lively Case Discussion #561 12/16 - 12/18/2006
Post by: Florida on December 17, 2006, 01:24:21 PM
Quote from: "Leslie"
Florida:  I was trying to respond to your email but it froze my Outlook!  I guess I should not have clicked on reply to email!  I will go over to Outlook Express and answer you.


Sending to Yahoo?


Title: Lively Case Discussion #561 12/16 - 12/18/2006
Post by: Anna on December 17, 2006, 01:31:29 PM
KatGram,

Well, we wouldn't have any reporting on this if not for the American reporters.  I think they did the best they could considering they were up against a brick wall from the get go.  They did not have the connections of deVries nor the clout of Jossy and had a language problem besides the concerted effort to misinform.  Odds were against any information getting out.

What does an ex-marine look like?  I have a dear friend who is a Marine now and she is a black female, just wondering how she is going to look in the future.   :shock:

.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #561 12/16 - 12/18/2006
Post by: Anna on December 17, 2006, 01:34:18 PM
O/T

On LMN there is right now a movie entitled "Stranded" described as Female Friends start to mysteriously disappear on a remote Caribbean Island.   And it is made in 2006.

So I guess the dangers are creeping into the national psyche.   :shock:

And Aruba thinks this will just go away if they stall and confab and obfuscate enough?

.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #561 12/16 - 12/18/2006
Post by: Appeals on December 17, 2006, 01:35:37 PM
Quote from: "Tylergal"
Quote from: "cubbeegirl"
Tyler, that was so sweet..... :cry:

And, since you always know the answer to these questions I have an O/T question for you.....
We are going to Illinois for the holidays and my orange tree is loaded with yummy , juicy oranges and I would like to take some with me to share with my family as they so enjoy them. Do you have any suggestions as to the best way to handle them? TYIA


Oh, you are sweet.  Can you get some kind of bedding straw and put it in a big box, preferably something constructed of wood but if not heavy cardboard or even a cheap ice chest from a mart.  Then kind of snuggle the bedding straw in between them.  IT's just to prevent them from rubbing and bruising each other.

If that is not possible, try getting some absorbent white tissue paper like you put in gift bags just so they won't be rubbing against each other.

I wish I had a tree full of oranges.  :)  I bought a Meyer lemon this year and am praying that we do not get a hard freeze that kills it.


Tyler, I agree with Cubbee.  What a nice post.

Cubbee, when I am trying to figure out the best way to do things, if possible, I look to see what the professional in that field would do.

In the case of your oranges, could you ask a market produce manager to give you some of those neat cardboard dividers that come from the orange cases at the market (the ones that look like oversized egg crates without lids)?  At our market, the produce manager is very cooperative in letting me have things like certain size boxes, etc., so maybe he would give you an orange box with the dividers to fit.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #561 12/16 - 12/18/2006
Post by: mishy on December 17, 2006, 01:43:12 PM
Hey monkeys! Just wanted to stick my head in before I take my daughter to a birthday party...I left a note for Altrust in the o/t thread for when she wakes up!

Hugs and have a wonderful day...It's gorgeous and warm today in AL!!


Title: Lively Case Discussion #561 12/16 - 12/18/2006
Post by: klaasend on December 17, 2006, 01:46:02 PM
O/T

Major developments expected Sunday in search for climbers, officials say

Story Updated: Dec 17, 2006 at 10:44 AM PST

By JOSEPH B. FRAZIER Associated Press WriterHOOD RIVER, Ore. (AP) - Search teams headed for the summit of Mount Hood on Sunday, hoping to find the snow cave where one of three missing climbers made a distress call a week ago as well as any other signs of the stranded mountaineers.

Rescue official also said Sunday that air search teams had spotted some "positive" signs that are helping them narrow their search to specific areas on the mountain.

Capt. Christopher Bernard, of the Air Force Reserve's 304th Rescue Squadron, wouldn't say exactly what was spotted, other than it is "climbing specific."

Search teams are headed to those areas where indicators where found.

"We found some very positive things up there, and that's what we have to look into," said Sgt. Sean Collinson of the Clackamas County sheriff's office. "But again, it's just determining whether we can get to see these things close up and to do it safely...

"In the next few hours, I would expect some major developments. But until that time, we just have to go with what we have right now."


Rescue teams hope to find any sign of the climbers, particularly the snow cave where one of the climbers' is believed to have made a cell phone call.

Teams are headed toward the summit up the north and south sides of the mountain.

Searchers got close to the 11,239-foot summit Saturday, reaching 10,600 feet before nightfall and worsening conditions forced them off the mountain. With the weather colder but clearer Sunday, they set out again from 6,000 feet and planned to make it to the top, officials said.

"Searchers will be able to see a long way down and a long way up" because of the better visibility, Collinson said.

Crews expected to make better time in their ascent thanks to a path they beat in the snow Saturday, said Sgt. Gerry Tiffany, of the Hood River County sheriff's office.

The teams on the mountain were to be joined for a third day by a Nevada Air National Guard C-130 cargo plane equipped with infrared heat sensors that could detect a person against the cold backdrop of snow.

There has been no communication from Kelly James, 48, of Dallas, 37-year-old Brian Hall of Dallas, or 36-year-old Jerry "Nikko" Cooke of New York City since Dec. 10, when James used his cell phone to call his family. He told them he was sheltering in a snow cave while his companions started back down the mountain, apparently to get help for him.

The last clue to their whereabouts was a brief signal returned from James' cell phone Tuesday.

On Saturday, the cold hobbled rescue efforts as some searchers had to come down because of facial frostbite.

However, that cold was accompanied by a temporary break in weeklong stormy conditions, paving the way for the biggest push yet since the three men were reported missing on what was to have been a quick climb to the peak.

Hood River County Sheriff Joe Wampler said Saturday that the odds of finding the three alive would improve if they kept the sleeping bags they had said they were taking with them. Some climbers stash gear to lighten their load as they climb, picking it up on the way back down, but Wampler said no stashes had been found.

At a news conference earlier Saturday, the mothers of the three climbers choked back tears as they expressed hope their sons would be found.

"I want the mountain to release our sons," said Cooke's mother, Maria Kim. "The mountain has no right to keep our sons."

(Copyright 2006 by The Associated Press. All Rights Reserved.)
 
Find this article at:
http://www.katu.com/news/4939596.html


Title: Lively Case Discussion #561 12/16 - 12/18/2006
Post by: Appeals on December 17, 2006, 01:50:36 PM
Quote from: "AZSunny"
Quote from: "Kat_Gram"
In Aruba, I don't know if they have to keep extending their visas but you never want to be out of country when thing lapses either. That might be why he didn't come here before. Can't apply for a continuation if you are not there.
Does anyone know how much Fox paid Joran for the fluffy thing with Greta ?
As for lawyers on these shows, ask 10 of them the same question, get 10 answers that are different.
Solution : Never ask a lawyer a question.
Deepak also broke the rule that if someone offers you $$$$$$$ cash for something, you take it.  Even more so if what you have to offer has a shelf life. He wanted more than 4 million for his story, give me a break.


Greta said that they did not pay Joran for the interview.


This is often said with a straight face by those who HAVE paid bigtime for an interview, but the "goods" are not paid in cash directly to the interviewee.  Their expenses are fully covered, and there are all kinds of ways to funnel money to someone without paying them directly.  Sorry to say.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #561 12/16 - 12/18/2006
Post by: Appeals on December 17, 2006, 01:55:45 PM
Quote from: "crazybabyborg"
Tacky's prediction: K2s will walk away from the Dr. Phil suit and will never be deposed.

I DOUBT THAT!

Is there "discovery" in a civil case?


Hope to shout!

Depositions
Interrogatories
Request for Admissions
Request for Statement of Damages
Subpoena of business records
Subpoena duces tecum which is a
Subpoena for witness to appear in person in connection with documents
Demand for inspection of documents and things
Demand for inspection of physical location(s)

I'm sure there are more, just these came to mind quickly.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #561 12/16 - 12/18/2006
Post by: LilPuma on December 17, 2006, 01:59:04 PM
I'll respond to your comments in Red:  

Quote from: "Anna"


Good Morning, Monkeys,

Have been busy reading all the posts and comments and had just a few random thoughts to share this morning.

Testimony is given in court, depositions taken out of court.  So will the Plaintiffs in the Dr. Phil case be required to give testimony in person?  I would think other parties involved might be allowed to submit depositions only but surely the plaintiffs must appear in person?  This would vary by state and have no idea what California says in this regard.

I'd be interested in knowing how they determine who is going to show up to testify in person and who can be deposed.   I can't imagine the Kalpoe's attorneys would have them NOT show up in person.  What would the jury think?  That Beth really has hired a hitman?  Hopefully there are no crazy Beth supporters who will do anything dumb when these guys get to LA.  We need to discourage any vigilantes if we hear/see of such talk.  That would only be bad for Beth, Truth and Justice.  

Even if Beth is not present, it is going to be difficult to find twelve people in the jury pool, usually taken from registered voters, who have not seen her face.  Compare and contrast with Ratface Boys.  No contest.  I hear Nadira behind all of this pushing, pushing, pushing just as she did for demanding the apology from Beth.  Remember that?  They made Beth apologize for calling those criminals criminals or else they would stop the investigation and even demonstrated in the streets AGAINST the mother of the missing Natalee.  They can't find it in their warped hearts to demonstrate FOR her but did against her.

Few people will have not heard about this case, but many will not have followed it or know that much about it.  If they lose, they'll blame those arrogant Americans.  It's what they do.  The protests against Nancy, Beth and the KIA filming incident is why I don't feel too sorry for the Aruban population in general (although I feel no animosity).  Rather than being concerned about the missing person and a thorough and honest investigation, they close their eyes to the corruption and get offended.  The negative comments about Natalee and Beth are their way of making them "disposable".  Who cares about these people, we have to protect ourselves.  Natalee doesn't matter.  If a prostitute goes missing, if a homeless person dies, it doesn't usually get front page coverage.  If a dishonest obnoxious person with low or no moral standards doesn't get justice, who cares?  So they reduced Natalee and Beth to something beneath themselves.  Something less than what they are.  Made pulling down the shades more palatable to them.  JMO

Don't cry for me, Argentina!

And while juries in that area have been known to side with the bad guys in the past, that was not with Dr. Phil participating in their selection.  This is what he was doing professionally when he met Oprah.  Remember when the buffoons of the Dark Side said she would fire him over this?  Brahahahaha!!  He makes her $50 mil a year and I dare say this is more than any other considerations she might have in this regard.

Oprah would cut the apron strings if she thought Dr. Phil had done something wrong.  If she knows he's on the side of what's good and right and true, she'll back him up with all she's got.  

I also think Greta was truly miffed that Beth went to the Internet Caf
e with another network and that seemed to be a cooling off point between them.  No proof of that, just my perception or over active imagination, whichever you chose to think.

But warped mindset of those on Aruba who see black as white and up as down are behind this.  I still fail to grasp how they think or why they think as they do as it is contrary to all logic and just unfathomable.

They live in a rather insular environment and aren't used to outside scrutiny.  Thus the strong resentment to Beth and the US media.  They also seem to have their own reality going on there.  

And do keep in mind that that transcript as Spooky pointed out is by Roger and the Church ladies so I just can't trust it as I am sure Deepak was given every consideration possible throughout.  Skeeters is a professional at what he does and while his questioning techniques may seem rather flawed, I think he was putting Deepak at ease more than anything, making Deepak think this was not being recorded despite having been told that Skeeters reserved the right to do so at any time.

I think the tape is claimed to have come from ALE and that is the one which sounds funny.  Not like the one played by Skeeters on TV.

I do think someone altered the tape to sound like Skeeters and Dr. Phil were lying.  The question is who?  This concerns me.  Like witnesses changing their statements or statements disappearing.  

We have yet to see any of the computer or cell phone records for Deepak for the night of Natalee's disappearance, right?  Without those, it is difficult to assess much as far as the alleged communications.  When I have time, I will look for Joran also saying they made lots of chatter was his word.  And then recall the virus entered the Sloot computer very timely that night and is was allegedly flooded with other stuff per the report?  What other stuff?  Was it the transmission of an eight and a half minute video of something or other?

Just random thoughts. . . . .


.




(http://i15.photobucket.com/albums/a360/AnnaBlueSkies/Greetings/Holidays/th3pc_holly_family_L.jpg)


Title: Lively Case Discussion #561 12/16 - 12/18/2006
Post by: Appeals on December 17, 2006, 01:59:13 PM
San, first, thank you for all the transcripts you do for all of us.

As to this statement of Taco:  He said the Kalpoes will probably walk away from the lawsuit and they will never get deposed in the United States.

Technically I think he is probably right because DK or SK would probably be noticed to have his deposition taken in Aruba or wherever he is living at the time it is to be taken.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #561 12/16 - 12/18/2006
Post by: LilPuma on December 17, 2006, 02:07:45 PM
Quote from: "Kat_Gram"
Maybe on the way out the door from Aruba to Surinam , luggage in hand in the garbage bags, Deepak will " remember" the conversations with Paulus. When he has nothing to lose. If they don't lay any charges by May or June of 2007, then he is almost home free on any lesser charges, isn't he ?
It will be a long time before the Deepak suit goes forward. And there certainly will be alot of blather and mis statement of fact on the networks. Like the former suspect thing.
I am pinning my hopes on Devries. And Jossy. The American Networks
are too concened with the ' entertainment ' value of a program. And sound bites.  
Did I miss any true investigative reporting on this case by Americans ?


They certainly seemed more concerned with getting footage and interviews than any down and dirty undercover investigations.  But like Anna said, they don't have sources there and there is a language problem.  I do think that Dr. Phil or JQK or both have had people working this covertly.  Like DeVries, we don't know what all they and the FBI have.  Remember that the FBI was there and though kept out of much of what was going on, they know more than we do.  

The "Iceberg Principle":   what you read/hear/see is a small portion of what's there.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #561 12/16 - 12/18/2006
Post by: Appeals on December 17, 2006, 02:13:27 PM
Quote from: "Lala'sMom"
Quote from: "Altruist"
I just finished copying & pasting it into my word processing program, it was all done in tables, so got rid of that for my own purposes.

Am going to post it now.


Thanks. I think we need it in it's entirety to actually see what is going on.  Maybe Dr. Phil will play the entire tape on his show.  It has a better effect when you actually hear it for yourself.  Sympathy goes right out the door for the poor, pitiful Kalpoes.


Unfortunately, my money is on that original tape not seeing the light of day where the public can get at it until (maybe) there is a trial.  The first things insurance defense lawyers do is tell their clients...all of them...to not reveal anything that could be evidence, also not to talk publicly about the case.  I am surprised that Dr. Phil is saying anything at all on Monday but will wait to see what is actually said.  Maybe only what we already know that is already "out there" publicly.  JMO


Title: Lively Case Discussion #561 12/16 - 12/18/2006
Post by: LilPuma on December 17, 2006, 02:15:33 PM
Quote from: "Ono"
Quote from: "Katysmom"
Quote from: "Kat_Gram"
I did not know Greta had said that about the cash thing.
Going to get a tv guide today to see if Phil is on later where I live.


I believe she said that all they pay for are transportation and hotel costs.


Yes, when all this dis-information came up months ago regarding FOX paying for interviews....No payment whatsoever for interviews, period...just expenses.


I wonder if "expenses" include Anita's makeover for her interview with Kimberly.   :shock: I wonder how long that transformation took.   :?:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #561 12/16 - 12/18/2006
Post by: Kat_Gram on December 17, 2006, 02:18:30 PM
There is a reason why I don't get Fox. Greta, Geraldo, many more names.
Look at the way they did the John Mark Karr  thing...
Overdone, and sensationalized or just plain C%^P.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #561 12/16 - 12/18/2006
Post by: LilPuma on December 17, 2006, 02:18:37 PM
Quote from: "robots"
here is the BOTTOM LINE

Joran did not get rid of the body by himself

so what we have is more than 1 PERSON that knows what happened  


when more than 1 person knows, all are nervous
because they never know when the SNEAKER will drop  :twisted:


it is coming...slowly but surely

never a doubt


Robots know how to keep it simple.  :)  More than one person knows what really happened.  The question, as the wise old owl would say, is WHO WHO WHO.    :?:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #561 12/16 - 12/18/2006
Post by: Appeals on December 17, 2006, 02:22:46 PM
Quote from: "LilPuma"
Quote from: "Lala'sMom"
Quote from: "klaasend"
Quote from: "Lala'sMom"
Did anyone ever find the rest of the Skeeters tape transcript?  Just wondering?

Yep, I just posted the part I missed.  It was the last segment.  Here's the part you were looking for:

Deepak Kalpoe: And, um, still has the nerve to come tell us, you know. (I) mean, come
on, the Aruban people, we, our familes, to tell you, quite frankly, we gave enough for someone, to tell you the truth, dressed like a slut, talked like one, was a racist…

Jamie Skeeters: The mother, I mean the daughter?


Deepak Kalpoe: The daughter.


Jamie Skeeters: Really?


Deepak Kalpoe: Was a racist, I mentioned.And um, would go in a car with three
strange guys. And her mother claiming her to be the little goody two shoes. Come on. Enough with the BS already. It's been enough. And, I can tell Beth on her face, I don’t care. I mean, go and say bad things on us. We don’t need any of this. We just don’t care anymore. I can tell Beth, you know, on her face, on camera, you know, "Screw you, go home. You made my life miserable. You ended it."


Now let's read that aloud in a CA court and see  Natalee's mother sitting across the table...Deepak, you're and idiot!


In the Dr. Phil suit, Beth won't be sitting at the table, but I'm knitpicking.  But since the tape is the subject of this lawsuit, I'm sure the jury will get to hear his anger, his contempt for the Natalee, his blaming the victim.  I want to hit him with a sledge hammer when he says "you made my life miserable.  You ended it."    Or maybe just give him a doctored drink and drive him somewhere.


But TacoP said on the Line-Up "but if they really want to pursue that they are going to have to answer questions by the Holloway family under oath if the judge allows it to be considered a companion case" and THAT means in his opinion THE H-T CASE will participate in the DR.P CASE DISCOVERY ?  "If they really want to pursue that" he was talking about the K's.   JMO


Title: Lively Case Discussion #561 12/16 - 12/18/2006
Post by: Appeals on December 17, 2006, 02:28:24 PM
Quote from: "Altruist"
Quote from: "Lala'sMom"
Puma
You are correct Beth won't be there, but just think how it sounds to all of us.  I can't wait for the tape to be played in court to a jury that some of them have their own children.  Most parents would do or at the least attempt to do what Beth did had their child gone missing.  I know I would.  Actually, I would have already taken the matter into my own hands and be in jail myself...but I digress...I am not as strong and courageous as Beth or Dave.  I don't have the patience they do. I so admire them for what they have done in all this. I know I have been on a rant about his today and maybe I will give it a rest for a while, but it just brings it all back to the guilty 3 that rode off into the wind with Natalee in the back seat of Deepak's car, never to  be seen again.  I have no sympathy for any of them and I dare say there are few in the USA that do.


Well, IMO if the attorneys for Dr. Phil wanted Beth Holloway Twitty or Dave Holloway to be present during the taking of depositions they could probably be there.  It's their dime, maybe Appeals can tell us that.


Normally, the only persons allowed in a deposition are:

The attorneys for all parties
Any and/or all parties to the action
Any non-party deponent that is the deponent giving this deposition

(Remember when Ron Goldman's sister in the OJ case was not allowed in the OJ deposition?)

But the light at the end of this tunnel may be if the judge declares the two cases companion cases.  That might open the door for all parties in both suits to attend all depositions in both cases.  I am not sure just how this would work, might require motions to get the court's approval.  JMHO


Title: Lively Case Discussion #561 12/16 - 12/18/2006
Post by: Kat_Gram on December 17, 2006, 02:29:53 PM
One last comment from me about those tapes :
Skeeters is a professional.
Why is the tape so bad ? Looks like an amateur made them. Sound like one too.
Why the controversy about what exactly did Deepak say ?
If the tapes had been done in a more professional manner, it would be
true " evidence " . Not some fodder for entertainment value.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #561 12/16 - 12/18/2006
Post by: Tylergal on December 17, 2006, 02:38:47 PM
Quote from: "Appeals"
Quote from: "AZSunny"
Quote from: "Kat_Gram"
In Aruba, I don't know if they have to keep extending their visas but you never want to be out of country when thing lapses either. That might be why he didn't come here before. Can't apply for a continuation if you are not there.
Does anyone know how much Fox paid Joran for the fluffy thing with Greta ?
As for lawyers on these shows, ask 10 of them the same question, get 10 answers that are different.
Solution : Never ask a lawyer a question.
Deepak also broke the rule that if someone offers you $$$$$$$ cash for something, you take it.  Even more so if what you have to offer has a shelf life. He wanted more than 4 million for his story, give me a break.


Greta said that they did not pay Joran for the interview.


This is often said with a straight face by those who HAVE paid bigtime for an interview, but the "goods" are not paid in cash directly to the interviewee.  Their expenses are fully covered, and there are all kinds of ways to funnel money to someone without paying them directly.  Sorry to say.


DING DING DING DING

However, I will add, had Greta been paying the K2 such outrageous funds, why did Mama Kalpoe call the cops on Greta?


Title: Lively Case Discussion #561 12/16 - 12/18/2006
Post by: Tylergal on December 17, 2006, 02:46:49 PM
Few people will have not heard about this case, but many will not have followed it or know that much about it. If they lose, they'll blame those arrogant Americans. It's what they do. The protests against Nancy, Beth and the KIA filming incident is why I don't feel too sorry for the Aruban population in general (although I feel no animosity). Rather than being concerned about the missing person and a thorough and honest investigation, they close their eyes to the corruption and get offended. The negative comments about Natalee and Beth are their way of making them "disposable". Who cares about these people, we have to protect ourselves. Natalee doesn't matter. If a prostitute goes missing, if a homeless person dies, it doesn't usually get front page coverage. If a dishonest obnoxious person with low or no moral standards doesn't get justice, who cares? So they reduced Natalee and Beth to something beneath themselves. Something less than what they are. Made pulling down the shades more palatable to them. JMO


from Lilpuma post....

great observation....


Title: Lively Case Discussion #561 12/16 - 12/18/2006
Post by: Appeals on December 17, 2006, 02:53:18 PM
Quote from: "Tylergal"
Quote from: "Appeals"
Quote from: "AZSunny"
Quote from: "Kat_Gram"
In Aruba, I don't know if they have to keep extending their visas but you never want to be out of country when thing lapses either. That might be why he didn't come here before. Can't apply for a continuation if you are not there.
Does anyone know how much Fox paid Joran for the fluffy thing with Greta ?
As for lawyers on these shows, ask 10 of them the same question, get 10 answers that are different.
Solution : Never ask a lawyer a question.
Deepak also broke the rule that if someone offers you $$$$$$$ cash for something, you take it.  Even more so if what you have to offer has a shelf life. He wanted more than 4 million for his story, give me a break.


Greta said that they did not pay Joran for the interview.


This is often said with a straight face by those who HAVE paid bigtime for an interview, but the "goods" are not paid in cash directly to the interviewee.  Their expenses are fully covered, and there are all kinds of ways to funnel money to someone without paying them directly.  Sorry to say.


DING DING DING DING

However, I will add, had Greta been paying the K2 such outrageous funds, why did Mama Kalpoe call the cops on Greta?


I did not mean to imply that Greta was willing to pay even $1 for anything the K's might have to say.  I was just speaking genericly about the disclaimer often heard that an interview was not paid for.  There was an extensive article which I did not save about how these things are arranged but I don't have the time to find it right now.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #561 12/16 - 12/18/2006
Post by: robots on December 17, 2006, 02:53:48 PM
Quote from: "LilPuma"
Quote from: "robots"
here is the BOTTOM LINE

Joran did not get rid of the body by himself

so what we have is more than 1 PERSON that knows what happened  


when more than 1 person knows, all are nervous
because they never know when the SNEAKER will drop  :twisted:


it is coming...slowly but surely

never a doubt


Robots know how to keep it simple.  :)  More than one person knows what really happened.  The question, as the wise old owl would say, is WHO WHO WHO.    :?:


its only a matter of time..

the way that paulus and joran are... wont surprise me when the next time
either one gets in trouble... they stab each other in the back  8)


Title: Lively Case Discussion #561 12/16 - 12/18/2006
Post by: Florida on December 17, 2006, 02:54:19 PM
Quote from: "Kat_Gram"
One last comment from me about those tapes :
Skeeters is a professional.
Why is the tape so bad ? Looks like an amateur made them. Sound like one too.
Why the controversy about what exactly did Deepak say ?
If the tapes had been done in a more professional manner, it would be
true " evidence " . Not some fodder for entertainment value.


Exactly!  Why is it that nothing is exact, precise in this case?
Jamie Skeeters leaving the sliding glass doors open (outside noise)
His bad setting up of the camera just before Deepak comes in.
And, we have no idea what Deepak really said.... :?

Why aren't people asking, "What do you mean by that?"

Did Skeeters & Deepak have an agreement of no recordings?


Title: Lively Case Discussion #561 12/16 - 12/18/2006
Post by: Florida on December 17, 2006, 02:56:30 PM
Quote from: "LilPuma"
Quote from: "robots"
here is the BOTTOM LINE

Joran did not get rid of the body by himself

so what we have is more than 1 PERSON that knows what happened  


when more than 1 person knows, all are nervous
because they never know when the SNEAKER will drop  :twisted:


it is coming...slowly but surely

never a doubt


Robots know how to keep it simple.  :)  More than one person knows what really happened.  The question, as the wise old owl would say, is WHO WHO WHO.    :?:


All of the father's and sons involved?


Title: Lively Case Discussion #561 12/16 - 12/18/2006
Post by: robots on December 17, 2006, 03:00:12 PM
Quote from: "Florida"
Quote from: "LilPuma"
Quote from: "robots"
here is the BOTTOM LINE

Joran did not get rid of the body by himself

so what we have is more than 1 PERSON that knows what happened  


when more than 1 person knows, all are nervous
because they never know when the SNEAKER will drop  :twisted:


it is coming...slowly but surely

never a doubt


Robots know how to keep it simple.  :)  More than one person knows what really happened.  The question, as the wise old owl would say, is WHO WHO WHO.    :?:


All of the father's and sons involved?



certainly more than just joran and doctor evil

 8)


Title: Lively Case Discussion #561 12/16 - 12/18/2006
Post by: Anna on December 17, 2006, 03:02:17 PM
.
I don't think anything Skeeters had would ever be allowed in court in Aruba as for that to happen, I believe he would have to have permission of a judge to collect the "evidence" and we know that would never happen.  Or if it did, the suspects would be tipped off before hand.

.

(http://i15.photobucket.com/albums/a360/AnnaBlueSkies/Greetings/Holidays/thATT222-1.gif)


Title: Lively Case Discussion #561 12/16 - 12/18/2006
Post by: carpe noctem on December 17, 2006, 03:02:37 PM
Quote from: "robots"
Quote from: "LilPuma"
Quote from: "robots"
here is the BOTTOM LINE

Joran did not get rid of the body by himself

so what we have is more than 1 PERSON that knows what happened  


when more than 1 person knows, all are nervous
because they never know when the SNEAKER will drop  :twisted:


it is coming...slowly but surely

never a doubt


Robots know how to keep it simple.  :)  More than one person knows what really happened.  The question, as the wise old owl would say, is WHO WHO WHO.    :?:


its only a matter of time..

the way that paulus and joran are... wont surprise me when the next time
either one gets in trouble... they stab each other in the back  8)



Yeah, BUDDY... you can say that again.

I HEAR-ED that!



 :D


(http://i76.photobucket.com/albums/j32/carpehumor/paulusindahizzy.jpg)


Title: Lively Case Discussion #561 12/16 - 12/18/2006
Post by: carpe noctem on December 17, 2006, 03:06:20 PM
(http://i76.photobucket.com/albums/j32/carpehumor/iluvnatJ4N.jpg)


Title: Lively Case Discussion #561 12/16 - 12/18/2006
Post by: Tylergal on December 17, 2006, 03:09:57 PM
Quote from: "Leslie"
Tyler:  How about adding to your #3.  Paul and Joran convinced Deepak and Satish that Natalee was a "racist" and she would never have consented to any sexual activity with them, whereas she would have done so willingly with Joran.  
P.S.  Thanks for your kind words in your post about how we all contribute what we can, depending on our abilities and it adds up to great teamwork.


Good point!


Title: Lively Case Discussion #561 12/16 - 12/18/2006
Post by: carpe noctem on December 17, 2006, 03:13:59 PM
MY BIFRON WEBSPACE ACCTS

featured people!

Say MERRY CHRISTMAS, sportersssssss?


http://tinyurl.com/y7p2mb

http://tinyurl.com/y5arpX

http://tinyurl.com/stzz7


---

-J4N

 :P


Title: Lively Case Discussion #561 12/16 - 12/18/2006
Post by: klaasend on December 17, 2006, 03:47:07 PM
***WARNING***WARNING***

DO NOT GO TO THE STORE!  IT'S A ZOO OUT THERE!

 :lol:  :lol:  :lol:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #561 12/16 - 12/18/2006
Post by: Tylergal on December 17, 2006, 03:52:51 PM
Quote from: "Appeals"
Quote from: "Tylergal"
Quote from: "Appeals"
Quote from: "AZSunny"
Quote from: "Kat_Gram"
In Aruba, I don't know if they have to keep extending their visas but you never want to be out of country when thing lapses either. That might be why he didn't come here before. Can't apply for a continuation if you are not there.
Does anyone know how much Fox paid Joran for the fluffy thing with Greta ?
As for lawyers on these shows, ask 10 of them the same question, get 10 answers that are different.
Solution : Never ask a lawyer a question.
Deepak also broke the rule that if someone offers you $$$$$$$ cash for something, you take it.  Even more so if what you have to offer has a shelf life. He wanted more than 4 million for his story, give me a break.


Greta said that they did not pay Joran for the interview.


This is often said with a straight face by those who HAVE paid bigtime for an interview, but the "goods" are not paid in cash directly to the interviewee.  Their expenses are fully covered, and there are all kinds of ways to funnel money to someone without paying them directly.  Sorry to say.


DING DING DING DING

However, I will add, had Greta been paying the K2 such outrageous funds, why did Mama Kalpoe call the cops on Greta?


I did not mean to imply that Greta was willing to pay even $1 for anything the K's might have to say.  I was just speaking genericly about the disclaimer often heard that an interview was not paid for.  There was an extensive article which I did not save about how these things are arranged but I don't have the time to find it right now.


Oh, yes, I know that.  I think Joran was paid based on what K2 are saying, thinking they would get a piece of the pie; however, they were not offered such and I think the VDS have profited from whatever they did to Natalee.  It seems a very happy thing to do in their circles.  Create murder and mayhem and stick your hand out for a payday.

I wish I could find some of the Marines catgram refers to, so that we could take them out but I have no idea where to find such a character.  All the kids that joined the Marines when my son was being courted for the Marine Drum & Bugle Corp band are quite docile kids, who went to church on Sunday, sang in the choir and had a lot of self-determination, some of whom joined to serve in the band, others to defend the country they love.  These were the group of kids who never played sports, who never were sent to the office, who never cheated on exams and never caused trouble in the parking lot, stayed home on Saturday nights instead of getting out and creating havoc and drinking but then maybe marines are different in different parts of the world and the stereotype that other countries have painted of our Marines are nothing like the wonderful guys that I knew who are well educated and bright, serving to protect and defend those who bash them day and night.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #561 12/16 - 12/18/2006
Post by: Ono on December 17, 2006, 03:59:06 PM
Quote from: "Kat_Gram"
Quote from: "Anna"
KatGram,

Well, we wouldn't have any reporting on this if not for the American reporters.  I think they did the best they could considering they were up against a brick wall from the get go.  They did not have the connections of deVries nor the clout of Jossy and had a language problem besides the concerted effort to misinform.  Odds were against any information getting out.

What does an ex-marine look like?  I have a dear friend who is a Marine now and she is a black female, just wondering how she is going to look in the future.   :shock:

.

Men that look like they don't take no crap. Marine tatoos on the extra large bicep. Gun in holster. Boots. More tatoos . The short cropped hair.
A manner of speaking that demands you listen up real good.  
Don't know how your friend will look. Depends on what she looked like before.
..
And as for the American Media... always the teasers and then a little blip of fluff. Didn't the Phil show come out with some chit about her being in a sex slave place ?. Now that was reponsible wasn't it ? There has been quite a bit of mis information in this case. Problem : Aruba not having the same spokeperson and reporters not fact checking before they came on the air and sensationalize with their bits of nonsence and tid bits. And what else, I do not know.
In England and here, evidence is never disclosed by the AG before a case goes to trial. Same kind of laws in Aruba. So, the silence that came from Aruba AG  left it open for the media to say whatever they wanted to.


Regarding the prudence of remaining mum, I see what you are saying, but you simply cannot equate England's laws with Aruba's laws and lump them all into the same basket as if they were equal; Aruban laws are really inferior. Also, all of our United States Marines do not fall into your visual. You do not have to look like what you describe to be strong, vigilant, brave and be Semper Fi.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #561 12/16 - 12/18/2006
Post by: Ono on December 17, 2006, 04:02:31 PM
Quote from: "LilPuma"
Quote from: "Ono"
Quote from: "Katysmom"
Quote from: "Kat_Gram"
I did not know Greta had said that about the cash thing.
Going to get a tv guide today to see if Phil is on later where I live.


I believe she said that all they pay for are transportation and hotel costs.


Yes, when all this dis-information came up months ago regarding FOX paying for interviews....No payment whatsoever for interviews, period...just expenses.


I wonder if "expenses" include Anita's makeover for her interview with Kimberly.   :shock: I wonder how long that transformation took.   :?:


What transformation? A shampoo & set? :roll: If that was a makeover, then send me to another salon. :shock:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #561 12/16 - 12/18/2006
Post by: Ono on December 17, 2006, 04:06:27 PM
Quote from: "Kat_Gram"
There is a reason why I don't get Fox. Greta, Geraldo, many more names.
Look at the way they did the John Mark Karr  thing...
Overdone, and sensationalized or just plain C%^P.


It's too bad you have decided to not expose yourself to the most unbiased of all the cable networks. FOX is not perfect, but FOX is the truly the most fair and balanced and the most up-to-date of all networks---MSM and Cable, with the news.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #561 12/16 - 12/18/2006
Post by: Ono on December 17, 2006, 04:09:51 PM
Quote from: "Tylergal"
Quote from: "Appeals"
Quote from: "AZSunny"
Quote from: "Kat_Gram"
In Aruba, I don't know if they have to keep extending their visas but you never want to be out of country when thing lapses either. That might be why he didn't come here before. Can't apply for a continuation if you are not there.
Does anyone know how much Fox paid Joran for the fluffy thing with Greta ?
As for lawyers on these shows, ask 10 of them the same question, get 10 answers that are different.
Solution : Never ask a lawyer a question.
Deepak also broke the rule that if someone offers you $$$$$$$ cash for something, you take it.  Even more so if what you have to offer has a shelf life. He wanted more than 4 million for his story, give me a break.


Greta said that they did not pay Joran for the interview.


This is often said with a straight face by those who HAVE paid bigtime for an interview, but the "goods" are not paid in cash directly to the interviewee.  Their expenses are fully covered, and there are all kinds of ways to funnel money to someone without paying them directly.  Sorry to say.


DING DING DING DING

However, I will add, had Greta been paying the K2 such outrageous funds, why did Mama Kalpoe call the cops on Greta?


 :lol:  :lol:  :lol: Mama would have served milk & cookies to Greta.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #561 12/16 - 12/18/2006
Post by: Ono on December 17, 2006, 04:13:34 PM
Quote from: "Tylergal"
Few people will have not heard about this case, but many will not have followed it or know that much about it. If they lose, they'll blame those arrogant Americans. It's what they do. The protests against Nancy, Beth and the KIA filming incident is why I don't feel too sorry for the Aruban population in general (although I feel no animosity). Rather than being concerned about the missing person and a thorough and honest investigation, they close their eyes to the corruption and get offended. The negative comments about Natalee and Beth are their way of making them "disposable". Who cares about these people, we have to protect ourselves. Natalee doesn't matter. If a prostitute goes missing, if a homeless person dies, it doesn't usually get front page coverage. If a dishonest obnoxious person with low or no moral standards doesn't get justice, who cares? So they reduced Natalee and Beth to something beneath themselves. Something less than what they are. Made pulling down the shades more palatable to them. JMO


from Lilpuma post....

great observation....


That is greatly stated.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #561 12/16 - 12/18/2006
Post by: Ono on December 17, 2006, 04:19:52 PM
Quote from: "Anna"
Quote from: "Kat_Gram"
Quote from: "Anna"

What does an ex-marine look like?  I have a dear friend who is a Marine now and she is a black female, just wondering how she is going to look in the future.   :shock:

.

Men that look like they don't take no crap. Marine tatoos on the extra large bicep. Gun in holster. Boots. More tatoos . The short cropped hair.
A manner of speaking that demands you listen up real good.  
Don't know how your friend will look. Depends on what she looked like before.
..
And as for the American Media... always the teasers and then a little blip of fluff. Didn't the Phil show come out with some chit about her being in a sex slave place ?. Now that was reponsible wasn't it ? There has been quite a bit of mis information in this case. Problem : Aruba not having the same spokeperson and reporters not fact checking before they came on the air and sensationalize with their bits of nonsence and tid bits. And what else, I do not know.
In England and here, evidence is never disclosed by the AG before a case goes to trial. Same kind of laws in Aruba. So, the silence that came from Aruba AG  left it open for the media to say whatever they wanted to.




No, that doesn't sound like my friend at all.  She has short hair sometimes but cornrows and a weave at other times with lots of tiny long braids.  I think she is too dark to have any tattoos at all as they would not show up.  As for boots and a gun, I am sure there is some sort of standard uniform they are required to wear and not likely reflective of personal taste in dress.

That doesn't sound like any Marines I know, in fact.  Sounds more like stereotyping.  I am surprised a Border Guard uniform would allow for visible biceps in the first place.  Must be warmer on the northern border than the southern one cause you sure can't see that much skin down here.

Of course, Dr. Phil has nothing to do with Fox but if not for Greta and Geraldo, I think we would know far less than we do or nothing at all.  I would imagine it is difficult to fill an hour every night without covering some things some people may not like.  With 24 hour news, all kinds of things get aired that perhaps would not on a network news hour.

Guess that's what the OFF switch is for.

.


Terrific post, Anna!  Of the United States' Marines friends that I have ever known, (enlisted or Commissioned Officers), they have never looked like what Kat-Gram has described as her vision of courage. :shock:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #561 12/16 - 12/18/2006
Post by: Ono on December 17, 2006, 04:23:16 PM
Quote from: "klaasend"
***WARNING***WARNING***

DO NOT GO TO THE STORE!  IT'S A ZOO OUT THERE!

 :lol:  :lol:  :lol:


 :lol: Am not...am wrapping gifts.  :lol:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #561 12/16 - 12/18/2006
Post by: Leslie on December 17, 2006, 05:00:24 PM
Quote from: "Ono"
Quote from: "Kat_Gram"
There is a reason why I don't get Fox. Greta, Geraldo, many more names.
Look at the way they did the John Mark Karr  thing...
Overdone, and sensationalized or just plain C%^P.

It's too bad you have decided to not expose yourself to the most unbiased of all the cable networks. FOX is not perfect, but FOX is the truly the most fair and balanced and the most up-to-date of all networks---MSM and Cable, with the news.

Ono: I don't know why you are disputing every opinion of Kat_Gram's but I doubt you have ever seen our national news station - the CBC -
or any Canadian newsmagazine programs such as The Fifth Estate or W5.   Our news is government sponsored with our tax dollars, so they do not have to play to the sponsors or go for ratings.  We have a different attitude to what is news and how to present it to the public.  It is jarring to switch the channel from those polite discussions of current affairs to the Fox hosts who interrupt and talk over their guests and want to turn everything into a debate.  I have never seen anything like Sean Hannity, rudely, asking someone a long-winded biased question and demanding he answer with YES or NO only and when he does not; belittle him with remarks about liberals.   The news is supposed to be about getting the facts to the public and allowing them to form an opinion.  To me, it seems, Fox has an agenda that is conservative, Republician, backing the Iraq war and the current Administration and anyone who doesn't agree with them is anti-American and their opinion is laughed at.  I suppose it is fair and balanced if you agree with them.  To view this from a Canadian perspective is a culture shock.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #561 12/16 - 12/18/2006
Post by: klaasend on December 17, 2006, 05:03:59 PM
If you turn on FOX or CNN right now you can watch the rescuers attempt to find the 3 climbers on Mount Hood.  They have about 90 minutes left before they have to quit for the day.  They are very close to what they believe to be the ice cave.

P.S. - let's please stop arguing amongst ourselves.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #561 12/16 - 12/18/2006
Post by: Tamikosmom on December 17, 2006, 05:13:47 PM
Quote from: "Florida"
Quote from: "Kat_Gram"
One last comment from me about those tapes :
Skeeters is a professional.
Why is the tape so bad ? Looks like an amateur made them. Sound like one too.
Why the controversy about what exactly did Deepak say ?
If the tapes had been done in a more professional manner, it would be
true " evidence " . Not some fodder for entertainment value.


Exactly!  Why is it that nothing is exact, precise in this case?
Jamie Skeeters leaving the sliding glass doors open (outside noise)
His bad setting up of the camera just before Deepak comes in.
And, we have no idea what Deepak really said.... :?

Why aren't people asking, "What do you mean by that?"

Did Skeeters & Deepak have an agreement of no recordings?



Jamie Skeeters

http://msnbc.msn.com/id/9646352/

ABRAMS: Jamie Skeeters, let‘s be clear, he knew he was being taped or not?

SKEETERS: Yes, I have that on tape. I have it witnessed by another former FBI and Deepak himself and another citizen of Aruba.

ABRAMS: OK. You‘re saying that yes, you believe he did know he was being taped?

SKEETERS: I have that on tape...


Title: Lively Case Discussion #561 12/16 - 12/18/2006
Post by: klaasend on December 17, 2006, 05:16:43 PM
Welcome Tamikosmom!


Title: Lively Case Discussion #561 12/16 - 12/18/2006
Post by: Tamikosmom on December 17, 2006, 05:18:10 PM
Quote from: "klaasend"
Welcome Tamikosmom!


Thanks Klass ....

Please delete my second post .... I thought I was editing my first.

Thanks

Janet


Title: Lively Case Discussion #561 12/16 - 12/18/2006
Post by: klaasend on December 17, 2006, 05:23:47 PM
Done!  Slow afternoon but hopefully tomorrow there will be some action in the case!


Title: Lively Case Discussion #561 12/16 - 12/18/2006
Post by: Leslie on December 17, 2006, 05:24:06 PM
Neither Kat_Gram or I have said anything that equates to military bashing or anything remotely anti-American.   Sometimes it is amusing to talk about our cultural differences.  I can tell that our harmless stories have affected some of you in a way I would never would have expected.  
I am sorry that I offended you Anna and Ono.  I don't come here to fight.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #561 12/16 - 12/18/2006
Post by: klaasend on December 17, 2006, 05:25:56 PM
Leslie - I know.  I wish people wouldn't argue with eachother in this thread.  I've just moved those posts between Kat_Gram, Tylergal and Anna into their own thread in the Monkey Lounge.  I don't mind disagreements, just not in this thread when it does not pertain to the case.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #561 12/16 - 12/18/2006
Post by: Appeals on December 17, 2006, 05:26:35 PM
Rob we see you.

Anything you can share with us?  We'll keep it under our hats.  There are very few of us here this afteroon.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #561 12/16 - 12/18/2006
Post by: Tamikosmom on December 17, 2006, 05:48:33 PM
Quote from: "klaasend"
If you turn on FOX or CNN right now you can watch the rescuers attempt to find the 3 climbers on Mount Hood.  They have about 90 minutes left before they have to quit for the day.  They are very close to what they believe to be the ice cave.

P.S. - let's please stop arguing amongst ourselves.


Klass ... I have been watching/listening for the last hour to the CNN breaking news .....

My thoughts and prayers are with the climbers, rescuers and family members.

A very anxious father of one of the missing climbers spoke a while ago and ... he claims ..... despite the emotional roller coaster .... the families are very hopeful.  The three men were very experienced and .... their survival skills may just be what it takes to see them through this ordeal.

Janet


Title: Lively Case Discussion #561 12/16 - 12/18/2006
Post by: klaasend on December 17, 2006, 05:51:58 PM
Quote from: "Tamikosmom"
Quote from: "klaasend"
If you turn on FOX or CNN right now you can watch the rescuers attempt to find the 3 climbers on Mount Hood.  They have about 90 minutes left before they have to quit for the day.  They are very close to what they believe to be the ice cave.

P.S. - let's please stop arguing amongst ourselves.


Klass ... I have been watching/listening for the last hour to the CNN breaking news .....

My thoughts and prayers are with the climbers, rescuers and family members.

A very anxious father of one of the missing climbers spoke a while ago and ... he claims ..... despite the emotional roller coaster .... the families are very hopeful.  The three men were very experienced and .... their survival skills may just be what it takes to see them through this ordeal.

Janet


I just heard that some of the searchers are going to stay on the mountain through the night.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #561 12/16 - 12/18/2006
Post by: Tamikosmom on December 17, 2006, 05:53:15 PM
Quote from: "Ono"
Quote from: "Kat_Gram"
There is a reason why I don't get Fox. Greta, Geraldo, many more names.
Look at the way they did the John Mark Karr  thing...
Overdone, and sensationalized or just plain C%^P.


It's too bad you have decided to not expose yourself to the most unbiased of all the cable networks. FOX is not perfect, but FOX is the truly the most fair and balanced and the most up-to-date of all networks---MSM and Cable, with the news.


Dave Holloway

http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,191377,00.html

VAN SUSTEREN: Did the media help or hurt you?

HOLLOWAY: Oh, the media was our best friend. If it hadn't been for the media this thing would have been swept under the table the very first day and we'd have been calling back to Aruba "Have you heard anything? Have you heard anything?" I truly believe that.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #561 12/16 - 12/18/2006
Post by: 2NJSons_Mom on December 17, 2006, 05:59:53 PM
Quote from: "klaasend"
Quote from: "Tamikosmom"
Quote from: "klaasend"
If you turn on FOX or CNN right now you can watch the rescuers attempt to find the 3 climbers on Mount Hood.  They have about 90 minutes left before they have to quit for the day.  They are very close to what they believe to be the ice cave.

P.S. - let's please stop arguing amongst ourselves.


Klass ... I have been watching/listening for the last hour to the CNN breaking news .....

My thoughts and prayers are with the climbers, rescuers and family members.

A very anxious father of one of the missing climbers spoke a while ago and ... he claims ..... despite the emotional roller coaster .... the families are very hopeful.  The three men were very experienced and .... their survival skills may just be what it takes to see them through this ordeal.

Janet


I just heard that some of the searchers are going to stay on the mountain through the night.


I've been glued to the news from Oregon for hours...The ice cave was found, no one inside.  Sleeping bag, some rope & 2 ice axes were left there.  I heard same that some will stay and some will be removed.  

Disappointing that they did not find the hikers, but they are not giving up.


Title: Blah
Post by: IBE on December 17, 2006, 06:00:45 PM
Blah

I'm still pages behind in my reading, but if no one has addressed the IP numbers listed on the firewall log here's the info:
64.15.124.85
OrgName:    YouTube, Inc.
OrgID:      YOUTU
Address:    71 E Third Ave
Address:    2nd Floor
City:       San Mateo
StateProv:  CA
PostalCode: 94401
Country:    US
radb@youtube.com  this is the only email address listed. There is not "abuse email" address listed

64.14.56.77
Savvis SAVVIS (NET-64-14-0-0-1)
                                  64.14.0.0 - 64.14.255.255
World Now SAVV-S235058-3 (NET-64-14-56-64-1)
                                  64.14.56.64 - 64.14.56.127
Not much info on that.
http://ws.arin.net/whois is the site where you can put in the IP addresses. Am waiting for my log on the firewall to show me where mine are coming from.. if any match, I'll let you know.

Expect alot of hits on all sites... it's the holidays and a great time for the baddies to do fraud.

Good luck

IBE


Title: Lively Case Discussion #561 12/16 - 12/18/2006
Post by: Tamikosmom on December 17, 2006, 06:05:35 PM
Quote from: "robots"
here is the BOTTOM LINE

Joran did not get rid of the body by himself

so what we have is more than 1 PERSON that knows what happened  


when more than 1 person knows, all are nervous
because they never know when the SNEAKER will drop  :twisted:


it is coming...slowly but surely

never a doubt



Robot, the former Aruban Chief of Police ..... who was in an official position to know .... concurs.

Janet


Gerold Dompig - 48 Hours Interview

http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2006/03/22/48hours/main1430644_page5.shtml

Dompig laid out the latest scenario of what happened after Natalee was last seen driving off with van der Sloot and the Kalpoe brothers shortly after 1 a.m. He says investigators think the group did not go to the beach but that they possibly brought Natalie back to the van der Sloots' home.


http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2006/03/22/48hours/main1430644_page5.shtml

Dompig speculates the body was hastily buried once, and that extra accomplices may have been needed to move it to a more hidden location.


http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2006/03/22/48hours/main1430644_page4.shtml

The Aruban authorities’ new theory is that someone, someone possibly very close to the young suspects, took the time to carefully hide the body, not once but maybe twice, literally re-burying her.


http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2006/03/22/48hours/main1430644_page3.shtml

Dompig says he believes Paulus Van der Sloot does know more than he has been telling about the circumstances surrounding Holloway's disappearance.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #561 12/16 - 12/18/2006
Post by: friend of monkeys on December 17, 2006, 06:11:32 PM
Quote from: "klaasend"
***WARNING***WARNING***

DO NOT GO TO THE STORE!  IT'S A ZOO OUT THERE!

 :lol:  :lol:  :lol:



TY KLASS
 :arrow:   I am only goiong to the mall if i have a taser. :lol:
I am wishing all a merry christmas now.....going south soon  :lol:

yes---i am like scrooge
but i is a happier scrooge when i b  in d sun!

Hope all the monkeys are enjoying a healthy and peaceful holiday season


Title: Lively Case Discussion #561 12/16 - 12/18/2006
Post by: friend of monkeys on December 17, 2006, 06:14:02 PM
Dompig could spill the beans........if u gave him the reward $$ and witness protection program....i think....


Title: Lively Case Discussion #561 12/16 - 12/18/2006
Post by: crazybabyborg on December 17, 2006, 06:14:23 PM
Hello Monkeys!

Been a busy day, but wanted to check in and see if anyone is expecting any coverage of the case tonight?


Title: Lively Case Discussion #561 12/16 - 12/18/2006
Post by: crazybabyborg on December 17, 2006, 06:19:36 PM
I'm watching the Mt. Hood climbers story. I just turned it on, but sounds like something's happening. The weather looks good........are they close?


Title: Lively Case Discussion #561 12/16 - 12/18/2006
Post by: crazybabyborg on December 17, 2006, 06:23:03 PM
Hey? Anybody home?  :cry:

A snow cave was found with gear in it? Anybody know what's going on?


Title: Lively Case Discussion #561 12/16 - 12/18/2006
Post by: crazybabyborg on December 17, 2006, 06:30:27 PM
One deceased climber has been found............


Title: Lively Case Discussion #561 12/16 - 12/18/2006
Post by: IBE on December 17, 2006, 06:30:58 PM
Oh darn one is deceased Was soooo hoping otherwise.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #561 12/16 - 12/18/2006
Post by: 2NJSons_Mom on December 17, 2006, 06:32:03 PM
A 2nd snow cave found.  One deceased found within.  ID has not been made.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #561 12/16 - 12/18/2006
Post by: crazybabyborg on December 17, 2006, 06:34:37 PM
Quote from: "2NJSons_Mom"
A 2nd snow cave found.  One deceased found within.  ID has not been made.


Fox reporting that the deceased's family has been notified ( from the Sherriff's dept.)

I had hope..........but if it's called off tonight, I don't know.


Title: Death
Post by: IBE on December 17, 2006, 06:34:55 PM
my late finance was left to die... I cry all the time with this time of new.

By the way,,, Keep up the good work, Monkeys.

Can hardly wait for tomorrow for the UPS truck for my Monkey Christmas stein and t-shirt. Should have ordered a sweatshirt.

Darn... I hope they find the others


Title: Lively Case Discussion #561 12/16 - 12/18/2006
Post by: crazybabyborg on December 17, 2006, 06:37:55 PM
I'm so sorry, IBE.

Any monkey who is so inclined............ prayer seems like a good idea.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #561 12/16 - 12/18/2006
Post by: Appeals on December 17, 2006, 06:40:03 PM
I drove over Mt. Hood on my way to Warm Springs in the early Spring.  It was so beautiful with the snow on the trees.  It seems so strange to me that people might have died in the past week just seeking recreation there.  I am so pulling for the families that they will find survivors.


Title: Re: Death
Post by: Appeals on December 17, 2006, 06:40:59 PM
Quote from: "IBE"
my late finance was left to die... I cry all the time with this time of new.

By the way,,, Keep up the good work, Monkeys.

Can hardly wait for tomorrow for the UPS truck for my Monkey Christmas stein and t-shirt. Should have ordered a sweatshirt.

Darn... I hope they find the others


IBE, could you explain the first sentence?  I am trying to understand.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #561 12/16 - 12/18/2006
Post by: Carnut on December 17, 2006, 06:41:31 PM
Quote from: "Leslie"
Neither Kat_Gram or I have said anything that equates to military bashing or anything remotely anti-American.   Sometimes it is amusing to talk about our cultural differences.  I can tell that our harmless stories have affected some of you in a way I would never would have expected.  
I am sorry that I offended you Anna and Ono.  I don't come here to fight.


Looks like a bad day for the Canadians, Geese folks, I'm about as American as it gets, and I totally understood what Kat-Gram was saying.

What's wrong with a U.S. Marine stereotype?

Geese.

My favorite military quote:

Yea, though I walk through the valley of death,

I fear no evil,

For I am that meanest Mutha in the valley.


That's a Marine.


Title: Prayer
Post by: IBE on December 17, 2006, 06:43:32 PM
Maybe after the Holidays we can have another Prayer day. It always seem to work for all involved and there is usually a change for Natalee afterwords.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #561 12/16 - 12/18/2006
Post by: 2NJSons_Mom on December 17, 2006, 06:44:13 PM
Quote from: "crazybabyborg"
Quote from: "2NJSons_Mom"
A 2nd snow cave found.  One deceased found within.  ID has not been made.


Fox reporting that the deceased's family has been notified ( from the Sherriff's dept.)

I had hope..........but if it's called off tonight, I don't know.


Yes, thanks, CBB.  There's a lot of speculation along with the facts.  Live press now saying no ID. Families are aware.


Title: Re: Blah
Post by: Carnut on December 17, 2006, 06:45:14 PM
Quote from: "IBE"
Blah

I'm still pages behind in my reading, but if no one has addressed the IP numbers listed on the firewall log here's the info:
64.15.124.85
OrgName:    YouTube, Inc.
OrgID:      YOUTU
Address:    71 E Third Ave
Address:    2nd Floor
City:       San Mateo
StateProv:  CA
PostalCode: 94401
Country:    US
radb@youtube.com  this is the only email address listed. There is not "abuse email" address listed

64.14.56.77
Savvis SAVVIS (NET-64-14-0-0-1)
                                  64.14.0.0 - 64.14.255.255
World Now SAVV-S235058-3 (NET-64-14-56-64-1)
                                  64.14.56.64 - 64.14.56.127
Not much info on that.
http://ws.arin.net/whois is the site where you can put in the IP addresses. Am waiting for my log on the firewall to show me where mine are coming from.. if any match, I'll let you know.

Expect alot of hits on all sites... it's the holidays and a great time for the baddies to do fraud.

Good luck

IBE


Bet you those hits are from what is called an internet 'web crawler', most all search engines are sending out 'web crawlers' to go to all IP addresses to find and catalog any websites/info for their search engines.

It's normally expected internet activity. Just looks like Youtude is out searching for videos.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #561 12/16 - 12/18/2006
Post by: BTgirl on December 17, 2006, 06:45:44 PM
Quote from: "Carnut"

Looks like a bad day for the Canadians, Geese folks, I'm about as American as it gets, and I totally understood what Kat-Gram was saying.

What's wrong with a U.S. Marine stereotype?

Geese.

My favorite military quote:

Yea, though I walk through the valley of death,

I fear no evil,

For I am that meanest Mutha in the valley.


That's a Marine.


Carnut, I have to agree. I read all of what was said, and I'm confused about how the original remark caused so much upset. When I first read it, I didn't see anything negative at all.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #561 12/16 - 12/18/2006
Post by: Sue on December 17, 2006, 06:46:30 PM
this is so horrible about this climber, his poor family
We need power of prayer tonight for the others 2 climbers
and for the climber already lost


Title: Lively Case Discussion #561 12/16 - 12/18/2006
Post by: crazybabyborg on December 17, 2006, 06:50:32 PM
Quote from: "2NJSons_Mom"
Quote from: "crazybabyborg"
Quote from: "2NJSons_Mom"
A 2nd snow cave found.  One deceased found within.  ID has not been made.


Fox reporting that the deceased's family has been notified ( from the Sherriff's dept.)

I had hope..........but if it's called off tonight, I don't know.


Yes, thanks, CBB.  There's a lot of speculation along with the facts.  Live press now saying no ID. Families are aware.


I just heard that, too, 2NJ. Can't imagine knowing one has died and being one of the 3 families.
Thanks!


Title: Lively Case Discussion #561 12/16 - 12/18/2006
Post by: IBE on December 17, 2006, 06:52:37 PM
OT

he was preparing for an off road race outside of Calif. City CA on the desert. His teenage son was with him. They were coming back off marked course in the tullies when other car came around a hill, curve had ran into his side. The crew of the other driver came out and got the other driver and went back to base camp. It was rumored that the other driver was on drugs or drunk.

My soulmate, (I think) was left there alone with his son and died of internal injuries. No one called in for help.

I didn't go with him and wish I had. I went back to the site and one could have gone like H. over the dirt roads after they got to them, and been to a phone withing 5 minutes. I would have called Edwards and they could have helicoptered him out. So we had a funeral instead of a wedding.

I still miss him; it was 1982. I know he is OK now.

Thanks for asking, My Monkey Friends.

Gosh, the National Guard spokesman on Fox is almost crying. They don't even know who it is!

This is terrible for all involved.

PS.. he and I always say a gray cloud over our sholders.. I know sounds odd... so carpe is that black circle over the boys should an omen?


Title: Lively Case Discussion #561 12/16 - 12/18/2006
Post by: crazybabyborg on December 17, 2006, 06:54:26 PM
Quote from: "Sue"
this is so horrible about this climber, his poor family
We need power of prayer tonight for the others 2 climbers
and for the climber already lost


I understand why, but my heart just sinks that another night is looming and no one will be there to rescue.

It's worrisome that with good weather today, there hasn't been an effort to be seen from the climbers; at least that has been visable to rescuers..


Title: Lively Case Discussion #561 12/16 - 12/18/2006
Post by: crazybabyborg on December 17, 2006, 06:59:23 PM
Quote from: "crazybabyborg"
Quote from: "Sue"
this is so horrible about this climber, his poor family
We need power of prayer tonight for the others 2 climbers
and for the climber already lost


I understand why, but my heart just sinks that another night is looming and no one will be there to rescue.

It's worrisome that with good weather today, there hasn't been an effort to be seen from the climbers; at least that has been visable to rescuers..


My prayer is that if the 2 climbers are alive right now, that they make it through the night..........
And tomorrow they be rescued alive.
Comfort and strength to the family who is facing loss.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #561 12/16 - 12/18/2006
Post by: BTgirl on December 17, 2006, 07:01:20 PM
Quote from: "IBE"
OT

he was preparing for an off road race outside of Calif. City CA on the desert. His teenage son was with him. They were coming back off marked course in the tullies when other car came around a hill, curve had ran into his side. The crew of the other driver came out and got the other driver and went back to base camp. It was rumored that the other driver was on drugs or drunk.

My soulmate, (I think) was left there alone with his son and died of internal injuries. No one called in for help.

I didn't go with him and wish I had. I went back to the site and one could have gone like H. over the dirt roads after they got to them, and been to a phone withing 5 minutes. I would have called Edwards and they could have helicoptered him out. So we had a funeral instead of a wedding.

I still miss him; it was 1982. I know he is OK now.

Thanks for asking, My Monkey Friends.

Gosh, the National Guard spokesman on Fox is almost crying. They don't even know who it is!

This is terrible for all involved.

PS.. he and I always say a gray cloud over our sholders.. I know sounds odd... so carpe is that black circle over the boys should an omen?

 :cry:  :cry:  :cry:  :cry:  :cry: (http://the-jurybox.com/TJB/Smileys/default/console.gif)


Title: Lively Case Discussion #561 12/16 - 12/18/2006
Post by: IBE on December 17, 2006, 07:03:03 PM
Those lost are very experienced, but in time, I would think one might panic or be snowblinded if they left the caves.

Sorry about my spelling errors in the post. I am very upset.

My significant other died doing something he loved to do, but that doesn't make it any easier.

Not knowing he was dead... I was on my new Apple IIe and got very tired. I took a nap and had a dream of beautiful white lights, fluffy clouds and woke up so calm and refreshed. I thought to myself, I should have more of those 15 minutes naps!

I know now it was a nap that was telling me it's OK. The time matched up to the time he died.

Gads... I need to change the subject.

Have any of you ordered any Monkey Christmas tree stuff?


Title: Lively Case Discussion #561 12/16 - 12/18/2006
Post by: Angiex911dsptchr on December 17, 2006, 07:08:59 PM
Evening..
Sad to hear about the climbers :(  

IBE.. Sighhhhhhhh. so so sorry honey.. and Im tearing up here right along with you.  Sending you a big wet hug.  God Bless yah.

 Tamikosmom  (Janet)  Welcome to SM. I have always admired your posts at BFN and T4N..  you are a very intelligent cookie!


Title: Lively Case Discussion #561 12/16 - 12/18/2006
Post by: Appeals on December 17, 2006, 07:10:53 PM
Thanks IBE for explaining.  I lost my soulmate also...heart attack at relatively young age.  Things have never been the same since, but I'm still here, so soldier on.  May God be with you and give you peace.

Must leave you all for today.  Who's job is it to clean the cage tonight? :D


Title: Lively Case Discussion #561 12/16 - 12/18/2006
Post by: IBE on December 17, 2006, 07:11:04 PM
The 'Y" found in the snow may mean that two *the top of the Y" men and bottom of the Y pointing the direction.

Taking a break... be back in a few.

There's still a change of them being alive if they didn't get too wet.

Pray for everyone, everywhere.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #561 12/16 - 12/18/2006
Post by: BTgirl on December 17, 2006, 07:11:18 PM
IBE

I know not everyone agrees with me, but even though I consider myself a Christian, I also think there is the possibility of reincarnation and seeing our loved ones again, not only in heaven, but spending another life with them on earth as well. One way or another, you will see him again, and maybe even get to have that wedding one day.

As for the Christmas tree merchandise, I have ordered a T-shirt and am very much looking forward to receiving it. I know it's gonna be beautiful when it gets here! :D


Title: Lively Case Discussion #561 12/16 - 12/18/2006
Post by: friend of monkeys on December 17, 2006, 07:14:01 PM
Quote from: "klaasend"
Welcome Tamikosmom!


ditto-------

glad to have another monkey


Title: Lively Case Discussion #561 12/16 - 12/18/2006
Post by: crazybabyborg on December 17, 2006, 07:17:04 PM
Quote from: "friend of monkeys"
Quote from: "klaasend"
Welcome Tamikosmom!


ditto-------

glad to have another monkey


(http://i25.photobucket.com/albums/c100/crazybabyborgs/Welcome.jpg)


Title: Re: Death
Post by: friend of monkeys on December 17, 2006, 07:17:08 PM
Quote from: "IBE"
my late finance was left to die... I cry all the time with this time of new.

By the way,,, Keep up the good work, Monkeys.

Can hardly wait for tomorrow for the UPS truck for my Monkey Christmas stein and t-shirt. Should have ordered a sweatshirt.

Darn... I hope they find the others



wow.  so sorry to hear about your fiance IBE.  this must be tough for u


Title: Lively Case Discussion #561 12/16 - 12/18/2006
Post by: crazybabyborg on December 17, 2006, 07:18:49 PM
FOM..............Where's your avatar? You're all nekky!  :shock:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #561 12/16 - 12/18/2006
Post by: BTgirl on December 17, 2006, 07:19:42 PM
Does anyone know of any media coverage on the case tonight?


Title: T-shirt Monkeys
Post by: IBE on December 17, 2006, 07:20:05 PM
Yeah for the T-shirt Monkey girls!

UPS tracking says my order is in Vernon CA.. as of two hours ago... so expect it tomorrow unless UPS delivers on Sunday.

That was really fast for regular shipping!

Go MONKEYS!

I can hardly wait to wear mine... think I might still get a sweatshire and tote... with a tote I can carry it all year and it would be a great way to spread the news and help needed re: Natalee and Aruba


Title: Lively Case Discussion #561 12/16 - 12/18/2006
Post by: crazybabyborg on December 17, 2006, 07:20:45 PM
Quote from: "BTgirl"
Does anyone know of any media coverage on the case tonight?


Don't have an answer to that, BT, but am wondering the same thing!


Title: Lively Case Discussion #561 12/16 - 12/18/2006
Post by: klaasend on December 17, 2006, 07:20:52 PM
Quote from: "BTgirl"
Does anyone know of any media coverage on the case tonight?

Possibly on the Lineup at 10pm Eastern


Title: Lively Case Discussion #561 12/16 - 12/18/2006
Post by: friend of monkeys on December 17, 2006, 07:21:20 PM
crazy are u pointing out my lack of cut and paste skills?

If i could make roses appear i would!   (  and other things...lol)


Title: Lively Case Discussion #561 12/16 - 12/18/2006
Post by: BTgirl on December 17, 2006, 07:21:37 PM
Quote from: "klaasend"
Quote from: "BTgirl"
Does anyone know of any media coverage on the case tonight?

Possibly on the Lineup at 10pm Eastern


Thanks, Klaas.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #561 12/16 - 12/18/2006
Post by: crazybabyborg on December 17, 2006, 07:23:32 PM
Quote from: "friend of monkeys"
crazy are u pointing out my lack of cut and paste skills?

If i could make roses appear i would!   (  and other things...lol)


Hey, FOM.............that won't do. We'll take care of that! Do you have the picture? Klaas is here too, so don't have a single doubt!  :wink:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #561 12/16 - 12/18/2006
Post by: 2NJSons_Mom on December 17, 2006, 07:23:35 PM
Quote from: "crazybabyborg"
FOM..............Where's your avatar? You're all nekky!  :shock:


You know the old saying 'I wish I had a dollar for every time'....well, Klaasend has posted our FOM's avatar several times, and it just didn't happen each time.  What are we going to do with her?   :lol:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #561 12/16 - 12/18/2006
Post by: crazybabyborg on December 17, 2006, 07:24:30 PM
Well...................post it again, please? We gotta take care of FOM!


Title: Lively Case Discussion #561 12/16 - 12/18/2006
Post by: klaasend on December 17, 2006, 07:24:50 PM
Want to hear something funny.  I set these up in Cafepress and didn't realize there were dark t-shirts too!  I'm glad because white is not a good color for me. :lol:

(http://images.cafepress.com/product/93781772v3_240x240_Front_Color-Navy.jpg)


Title: Lively Case Discussion #561 12/16 - 12/18/2006
Post by: LilPuma on December 17, 2006, 07:26:38 PM
Quote from: "Appeals"



Normally, the only persons allowed in a deposition are:

The attorneys for all parties
Any and/or all parties to the action
Any non-party deponent that is the deponent giving this deposition

(Remember when Ron Goldman's sister in the OJ case was not allowed in the OJ deposition?)

But the light at the end of this tunnel may be if the judge declares the two cases companion cases.  That might open the door for all parties in both suits to attend all depositions in both cases.  I am not sure just how this would work, might require motions to get the court's approval.  JMHO


I think it would be very bad for Beth to be anywhere near any depositions taken in the Kalpoe v McGraw case.  It would not surprise me if she was in LA, maybe in the courtroom if it actually gets to trial, but I think if she was there every day it would make her appear to be obssessed or on some kind of vendetta.  

I'm hopeful that it will be considered a "companion" or "related" case especially since Beth's discussing this tape on news shows is mentioned over and over and over in the 53 pages and there would have been no investigation by Dr. Phil if it wasn't for Beth tenacity.  Judges don't always share my opinion though.     :(


Title: T-shirts
Post by: IBE on December 17, 2006, 07:31:33 PM
Klaas,

white isn't good for me either... I just didn't look at all of them before I ordered. Ugh.. just a good excuse to order again?

Are there any cookbooks left or reprinting in the future?

Wish nonsuche cookies were on CafePress.. Yum

Thanks All!

IBE


Title: Lively Case Discussion #561 12/16 - 12/18/2006
Post by: friend of monkeys on December 17, 2006, 07:31:53 PM
Quote from: "crazybabyborg"
FOM..............Where's your avatar? You're all nekky!  :shock:


FOM still can't get it up..lol

hi BT.. :lol: .was wondering too...probably not tonite...i am guessing


Title: Lively Case Discussion #561 12/16 - 12/18/2006
Post by: LilPuma on December 17, 2006, 07:33:05 PM
Quote from: "crazybabyborg"
Quote from: "crazybabyborg"
Quote from: "Sue"
this is so horrible about this climber, his poor family
We need power of prayer tonight for the others 2 climbers
and for the climber already lost


I understand why, but my heart just sinks that another night is looming and no one will be there to rescue.

It's worrisome that with good weather today, there hasn't been an effort to be seen from the climbers; at least that has been visable to rescuers..


My prayer is that if the 2 climbers are alive right now, that they make it through the night..........
And tomorrow they be rescued alive.
Comfort and strength to the family who is facing loss.


Well said.  It' so sad because it does appear the one guy left his sleeping bag and cave for some reason and couldn't find his way back.  The sleeping bag sounds like it was the key to his survival.  I don't understand why they can't find warm bodies with all the equipment they have or why it's taking so long.   :cry:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #561 12/16 - 12/18/2006
Post by: friend of monkeys on December 17, 2006, 07:33:52 PM
Quote from: "crazybabyborg"
Well...................post it again, please? We gotta take care of FOM!


u guys r sweet---Klass has done me a ton of favors...being naked is the least of my worries...lol.

Plus...doing massge i am kinda used to it ya know?


Title: Lively Case Discussion #561 12/16 - 12/18/2006
Post by: Angiex911dsptchr on December 17, 2006, 07:35:09 PM
Quote from: "friend of monkeys"
Quote from: "crazybabyborg"
Well...................post it again, please? We gotta take care of FOM!


u guys r sweet---Klass has done me a ton of favors...being naked is the least of my worries...lol.

Plus...doing massge i am kinda used to it ya know?


  ROFL  FOM  you crack me up chicky!!  :)


Title: Lively Case Discussion #561 12/16 - 12/18/2006
Post by: klaasend on December 17, 2006, 07:35:31 PM
Quote from: "crazybabyborg"
Well...................post it again, please? We gotta take care of FOM!


Depends upon which one she wants, lol  :lol:   Her Christmas one where she "sat" on the tree... :lol:

(http://i37.photobucket.com/albums/e82/klaasend2/fom2.gif)

http://i37.photobucket.com/albums/e82/klaasend2/fom2.gif

Or her regular one...

(http://i37.photobucket.com/albums/e82/klaasend2/fom-1.jpg)

http://i37.photobucket.com/albums/e82/klaasend2/fom-1.jpg

FOM - just right mouse click and copy the link then go to your profile and paste it into the THIRD option in your profile for avatars.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #561 12/16 - 12/18/2006
Post by: friend of monkeys on December 17, 2006, 07:35:39 PM
GREAT SHIRT KLASS!
i like the blue


Title: Re: T-shirts
Post by: klaasend on December 17, 2006, 07:36:50 PM
Quote from: "IBE"
Klaas,

white isn't good for me either... I just didn't look at all of them before I ordered. Ugh.. just a good excuse to order again?

Are there any cookbooks left or reprinting in the future?

Wish nonsuche cookies were on CafePress.. Yum

Thanks All!

IBE


IBE - don't know about the cookbooks.  I don't think there are any left but I'll ask Mrs. Red the next time I see her.  I know the Red's have been busy this weekend.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #561 12/16 - 12/18/2006
Post by: Tamikosmom on December 17, 2006, 07:38:07 PM
Thanks you all for the welcome.  However ... I have been lurking for sometime.   :wink:

IBE ... thank you for the explanation regarding the placement of the rope by the climbers ....  this simple survival tactic makes so much sense.  It is unfortunate that the weather had not cleared sooner.

I hope that families of the two climbers still missing will receive miraculous news very soon.  My prayers go out to the family of the climber who did not make it.

Janet.

_________

The Reason for the Season

(http://img90.imageshack.us/img90/7092/nativityfh0.jpg)


Title: Lively Case Discussion #561 12/16 - 12/18/2006
Post by: crazybabyborg on December 17, 2006, 07:38:35 PM
Quote from: "klaasend"
Quote from: "crazybabyborg"
Well...................post it again, please? We gotta take care of FOM!


Depends upon which one she wants, lol  :lol:   Her Christmas one where she "sat" on the tree... :lol:

(http://i37.photobucket.com/albums/e82/klaasend2/fom2.gif)

http://i37.photobucket.com/albums/e82/klaasend2/fom2.gif

Or her regular one...

(http://i37.photobucket.com/albums/e82/klaasend2/fom-1.jpg)

http://i37.photobucket.com/albums/e82/klaasend2/fom-1.jpg

FOM - just right mouse click and copy the link then go to your profile and paste it into the THIRD option in your profile for avatars.


What she said.................exactly what she said!  :wink:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #561 12/16 - 12/18/2006
Post by: klaasend on December 17, 2006, 07:39:57 PM
Maybe because these are the mens shirts.  I don't mind wearing a mans t-shirt though.

(http://images.cafepress.com/product/93781772v3_240x240_Front_Color-Cardinal.jpg)

(http://images.cafepress.com/product/93781772v3_240x240_Front_Color-MilitaryGreen.jpg)

(http://images.cafepress.com/product/93781772v3_240x240_Front_Color-Black.jpg)

(http://images.cafepress.com/product/93781772v3_240x240_Front_Color-Navy.jpg)


Title: Lively Case Discussion #561 12/16 - 12/18/2006
Post by: crazybabyborg on December 17, 2006, 07:44:07 PM
I like the colored shirts, too! Gotta Get one of those! I like the men's, cause I get them really big and use them as sleep shirts. I don't have anybody to impress, so I just please ME!  I throw on the flannel sleep pants when it's cold, and I'm all ready to chat with the monkeys! :lol:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #561 12/16 - 12/18/2006
Post by: blah on December 17, 2006, 07:44:08 PM
Quote from: "Tamikosmom"
Quote from: "Florida"
Quote from: "Kat_Gram"
One last comment from me about those tapes :
Skeeters is a professional.
Why is the tape so bad ? Looks like an amateur made them. Sound like one too.
Why the controversy about what exactly did Deepak say ?
If the tapes had been done in a more professional manner, it would be
true " evidence " . Not some fodder for entertainment value.


Exactly!  Why is it that nothing is exact, precise in this case?
Jamie Skeeters leaving the sliding glass doors open (outside noise)
His bad setting up of the camera just before Deepak comes in.
And, we have no idea what Deepak really said.... :?

Why aren't people asking, "What do you mean by that?"

Did Skeeters & Deepak have an agreement of no recordings?



Jamie Skeeters

http://msnbc.msn.com/id/9646352/

ABRAMS: Jamie Skeeters, let‘s be clear, he knew he was being taped or not?

SKEETERS: Yes, I have that on tape. I have it witnessed by another former FBI and Deepak himself and another citizen of Aruba.

ABRAMS: OK. You‘re saying that yes, you believe he did know he was being taped?

SKEETERS: I have that on tape...


NICE!

That ought to put that one to bed !!


Title: Lively Case Discussion #561 12/16 - 12/18/2006
Post by: Carnut on December 17, 2006, 07:45:15 PM
Quote from: "friend of monkeys"
Quote from: "crazybabyborg"
FOM..............Where's your avatar? You're all nekky!  :shock:


FOM still can't get it up..lol

hi BT.. :lol: .was wondering too...probably not tonite...i am guessing


Guess you could try Viagra to get it up....


Title: Lively Case Discussion #561 12/16 - 12/18/2006
Post by: LilPuma on December 17, 2006, 07:46:53 PM
Quote from: "IBE"
OT

My soulmate, (I think) was left there alone with his son and died of internal injuries. No one called in for help.



I'm so sorry to hear you had to go through this.  I'll never understand no one calling for help in that kind of situation.  Don't know what goes through the minds of some.  Maybe nothing much.   :cry:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #561 12/16 - 12/18/2006
Post by: Katysmom on December 17, 2006, 07:48:00 PM
Quote from: "Carnut"
Quote from: "friend of monkeys"
Quote from: "crazybabyborg"
FOM..............Where's your avatar? You're all nekky!  :shock:


FOM still can't get it up..lol

hi BT.. :lol: .was wondering too...probably not tonite...i am guessing


Guess you could try Viagra to get it up....


roflmao!!  I was going to make a similar comment, but decided to bite my tongue.  Leave it to you, Carnut to speak up!


Title: Lively Case Discussion #561 12/16 - 12/18/2006
Post by: Sam on December 17, 2006, 07:49:43 PM
Quote from: "BTgirl"
IBE

I know not everyone agrees with me, but even though I consider myself a Christian, I also think there is the possibility of reincarnation and seeing our loved ones again, not only in heaven, but spending another life with them on earth as well. One way or another, you will see him again, and maybe even get to have that wedding one day.

As for the Christmas tree merchandise, I have ordered a T-shirt and am very much looking forward to receiving it. I know it's gonna be beautiful when it gets here! :D


I also consider myself a Christian. I also believe in reincarnation. I have always felt that my Dh and I have always been together in past lives as well as this one.

I read a series of books, fiction, sorry I can't remember the Authors name right now. It will probably keep me up tonight unless I google it. lOL
The first book I read by her was "Knight in Shining Armor" Sort of a light hearted love story. There were at least 3 books maybe more until it all gets resolved  You may want to read them IBE and Appeals. Just for fun.

I guess now I believe we will always at least see our lost loved ones again. Pets as well. At least I hope so.

I am praying for the Hikers and there families and loved ones. JMHO

Sam


Title: Lively Case Discussion #561 12/16 - 12/18/2006
Post by: San on December 17, 2006, 07:51:05 PM
Quote from: "klaasend"
Maybe because these are the mens shirts.  I don't mind wearing a mans t-shirt though.

(http://images.cafepress.com/product/93781772v3_240x240_Front_Color-Cardinal.jpg)

(http://images.cafepress.com/product/93781772v3_240x240_Front_Color-MilitaryGreen.jpg)

(http://images.cafepress.com/product/93781772v3_240x240_Front_Color-Black.jpg)

(http://images.cafepress.com/product/93781772v3_240x240_Front_Color-Navy.jpg)

I like these colors.  I ordered a mans T-Shirt last time.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #561 12/16 - 12/18/2006
Post by: crazybabyborg on December 17, 2006, 07:51:19 PM
Quote from: "Carnut"
Quote from: "friend of monkeys"
Quote from: "crazybabyborg"
FOM..............Where's your avatar? You're all nekky!  :shock:


FOM still can't get it up..lol

hi BT.. :lol: .was wondering too...probably not tonite...i am guessing


Guess you could try Viagra to get it up....


What....................Fix A Flat?  :lol:

FOM; did you try Klaas's directions? Right click THE LINK under the picture you want: a box comes up; select COPY
Go into your PROFILE and go to the THIRD BOX in the avatar section of your profile. Right click again, in that box and select PASTE.
Then click the SUBMIT button at the bottom of the page.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #561 12/16 - 12/18/2006
Post by: BTgirl on December 17, 2006, 07:54:42 PM
Quote from: "Sam"
Quote from: "BTgirl"
IBE

I know not everyone agrees with me, but even though I consider myself a Christian, I also think there is the possibility of reincarnation and seeing our loved ones again, not only in heaven, but spending another life with them on earth as well. One way or another, you will see him again, and maybe even get to have that wedding one day.

As for the Christmas tree merchandise, I have ordered a T-shirt and am very much looking forward to receiving it. I know it's gonna be beautiful when it gets here! :D


I also consider myself a Christian. I also believe in reincarnation. I have always felt that my Dh and I have always been together in past lives as well as this one.

I read a series of books, fiction, sorry I can't remember the Authors name right now. It will probably keep me up tonight unless I google it. lOL
The first book I read by her was "Knight in Shining Armor" Sort of a light hearted love story. There were at least 3 books maybe more until it all gets resolved  You may want to read them IBE and Appeals. Just for fun.

I guess now I believe we will always at least see our lost loved ones again. Pets as well. At least I hope so.

I am praying for the Hikers and there families and loved ones. JMHO

Sam


Thanks, Sam. I'm glad it's not just me.  :oops: I will check out the book you mentioned. You know, the first time I met hubby I felt as if I already knew him. And the oddest thing is, no one ever proposed to anyone. We just knew we were going to get married and started planning the wedding. :lol:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #561 12/16 - 12/18/2006
Post by: crazybabyborg on December 17, 2006, 07:55:41 PM
:oops:  :oops:  :oops:  :oops:

You just have to try again, FOM, because attempting to give instructions in the presence of Klaas is really intimidating!!   :lol:  :lol:  :lol:

( She gave me similar instructions to get my own up and that's the ONLY reason I'm trying to pass it along. If I can do it, ANYBODY can! )


Title: Lively Case Discussion #561 12/16 - 12/18/2006
Post by: Angiex911dsptchr on December 17, 2006, 07:58:05 PM
Quote from: "BTgirl"
Quote from: "Sam"
Quote from: "BTgirl"
IBE

I know not everyone agrees with me, but even though I consider myself a Christian, I also think there is the possibility of reincarnation and seeing our loved ones again, not only in heaven, but spending another life with them on earth as well. One way or another, you will see him again, and maybe even get to have that wedding one day.

As for the Christmas tree merchandise, I have ordered a T-shirt and am very much looking forward to receiving it. I know it's gonna be beautiful when it gets here! :D


I also consider myself a Christian. I also believe in reincarnation. I have always felt that my Dh and I have always been together in past lives as well as this one.

I read a series of books, fiction, sorry I can't remember the Authors name right now. It will probably keep me up tonight unless I google it. lOL
The first book I read by her was "Knight in Shining Armor" Sort of a light hearted love story. There were at least 3 books maybe more until it all gets resolved  You may want to read them IBE and Appeals. Just for fun.

I guess now I believe we will always at least see our lost loved ones again. Pets as well. At least I hope so.

I am praying for the Hikers and there families and loved ones. JMHO

Sam


Thanks, Sam. I'm glad it's not just me.  :oops: I will check out the book you mentioned. You know, the first time I met hubby I felt as if I already knew him. And the oddest thing is, no one ever proposed to anyone. We just knew we were going to get married and started planning the wedding. :lol:


  :)  BT.. and til this day  Mr Simon and DA BRUSH keeps yah together..:wink:

(http://i12.photobucket.com/albums/a206/Angiex911dsptchr/toothbrush-1.gif)


Title: Lively Case Discussion #561 12/16 - 12/18/2006
Post by: crazybabyborg on December 17, 2006, 08:00:44 PM
They're showing the "Y" and the footprints on CNN now.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #561 12/16 - 12/18/2006
Post by: BTgirl on December 17, 2006, 08:01:24 PM
Quote from: "Angiex911dsptchr"

  :)  BT.. and til this day  Mr Simon and DA BRUSH keeps yah together..:wink:

(http://i12.photobucket.com/albums/a206/Angiex911dsptchr/toothbrush-1.gif)


Angie -  :lol:  :lol:  :lol:  :lol:  :lol:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #561 12/16 - 12/18/2006
Post by: blah on December 17, 2006, 08:02:57 PM
is dana doing a show tonight?

are any of the networks covering the case tonight?


Title: Lively Case Discussion #561 12/16 - 12/18/2006
Post by: mishy on December 17, 2006, 08:04:18 PM
Quote from: "BTgirl"
Quote from: "Angiex911dsptchr"

  :)  BT.. and til this day  Mr Simon and DA BRUSH keeps yah together..:wink:

(http://i12.photobucket.com/albums/a206/Angiex911dsptchr/toothbrush-1.gif)


Angie -  :lol:  :lol:  :lol:  :lol:  :lol:


 :lol:  :lol:  :lol:  :lol:  :lol:  :lol:  :lol:  :lol:  :wink:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #561 12/16 - 12/18/2006
Post by: klaasend on December 17, 2006, 08:06:07 PM
Quote from: "blah"
is dana doing a show tonight?

are any of the networks covering the case tonight?

As far as I know, nothing on Dana tonight.  The LINEUP may have something on the case..not sure.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #561 12/16 - 12/18/2006
Post by: blah on December 17, 2006, 08:09:53 PM
this thing with the mountain climbers reminds of of the thing with the trapped coal miners in West Virgina or wherever that was.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #561 12/16 - 12/18/2006
Post by: crazybabyborg on December 17, 2006, 08:14:54 PM
(http://i25.photobucket.com/albums/c100/crazybabyborgs/blah.jpg)

It's slow and I'm playing. When I grow up, I wanna be Klaas!  :lol:

Merry Christmas, Blah! ( It's the thought that counts, remember)  :wink:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #561 12/16 - 12/18/2006
Post by: blah on December 17, 2006, 08:19:25 PM
Quote from: "crazybabyborg"
(http://i25.photobucket.com/albums/c100/crazybabyborgs/blah.jpg)

It's slow and I'm playing. When I grow up, I wanna be Klaas!  :lol:

Merry Christmas, Blah! ( It's the thought that counts, remember)  :wink:


that looks pretty good!!

Merry Christmas to you too crazybabyborg!!


Title: Lively Case Discussion #561 12/16 - 12/18/2006
Post by: Sam on December 17, 2006, 08:20:48 PM
Knight In Shining Armor by Jude Deveraux

Abandoned by a cruel fate, lovely, thoroughly modern Dougless Montgomery lay weeping upon a cold tombstone in an English church. Suddenly, as if in answer to her prayers, the most extraordinary man appeared.

He was Nicholas Stafford, Earl of Thornwyck...and according to his tombstone he had died in1564. Tall, broad of shoulder, attired in gleaming silver and gold, he was magnificent. Drawn to his side by a bond so sudden and compelling it overshadowed reason, Dougless knew that Nicholas was nothing less than a miracle: a man who would not seek to change her, who found her perfect, fascinating, just as she was.

Yet she could not imagine how strong were the chains that tied them to the past...or the grand adventure that lay before them....


Title: Lively Case Discussion #561 12/16 - 12/18/2006
Post by: crazybabyborg on December 17, 2006, 08:23:14 PM
(http://i25.photobucket.com/albums/c100/crazybabyborgs/blah1.jpg)

I'm just learning, blah. Klaas can even make SNOWGLOBES! I'm just trying to fix the letters in "blah"!  :lol:

Thanks for your involuntary use of your avatar.  :wink:  Monkeys are so patient!


Title: Lively Case Discussion #561 12/16 - 12/18/2006
Post by: blah on December 17, 2006, 08:26:21 PM
Quote from: "crazybabyborg"
(http://i25.photobucket.com/albums/c100/crazybabyborgs/blah1.jpg)

I'm just learning, blah. Klaas can even make SNOWGLOBES! I'm just trying to fix the letters in "blah"!  :lol:

Thanks for your involuntary use of your avatar.  :wink:  Monkeys are so patient!


Thanks for fixing it up for the hollidays, if your done playing with it maybe i can use it until after the hollidays?


Title: Lively Case Discussion #561 12/16 - 12/18/2006
Post by: crazybabyborg on December 17, 2006, 08:28:51 PM
Sure, but give me a sec...the letters are looking better. I'll post it in a sec, k?


Title: Lively Case Discussion #561 12/16 - 12/18/2006
Post by: justinsmama on December 17, 2006, 08:29:47 PM
Quote from: "BTgirl"
Quote from: "Carnut"

Looks like a bad day for the Canadians, Geese folks, I'm about as American as it gets, and I totally understood what Kat-Gram was saying.

What's wrong with a U.S. Marine stereotype?

Geese.

My favorite military quote:

Yea, though I walk through the valley of death,

I fear no evil,

For I am that meanest Mutha in the valley.


That's a Marine.


Carnut, I have to agree. I read all of what was said, and I'm confused about how the original remark caused so much upset. When I first read it, I didn't see anything negative at all.


Ditto.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #561 12/16 - 12/18/2006
Post by: BTgirl on December 17, 2006, 08:30:12 PM
Quote from: "Sam"
Knight In Shining Armor by Jude Deveraux

Abandoned by a cruel fate, lovely, thoroughly modern Dougless Montgomery lay weeping upon a cold tombstone in an English church. Suddenly, as if in answer to her prayers, the most extraordinary man appeared.

He was Nicholas Stafford, Earl of Thornwyck...and according to his tombstone he had died in1564. Tall, broad of shoulder, attired in gleaming silver and gold, he was magnificent. Drawn to his side by a bond so sudden and compelling it overshadowed reason, Dougless knew that Nicholas was nothing less than a miracle: a man who would not seek to change her, who found her perfect, fascinating, just as she was.

Yet she could not imagine how strong were the chains that tied them to the past...or the grand adventure that lay before them....


Thanks, Sam!


Title: Lively Case Discussion #561 12/16 - 12/18/2006
Post by: crazybabyborg on December 17, 2006, 08:31:59 PM
(http://i25.photobucket.com/albums/c100/crazybabyborgs/blah3.jpg)

(http://i25.photobucket.com/albums/c100/crazybabyborgs/blah1.jpg)

Whichever you want, blah. And please don't feel obligated to use it. It won't hurt my feelings at all if you don't. But you're welcome to!  :wink:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #561 12/16 - 12/18/2006
Post by: blah on December 17, 2006, 08:32:12 PM
Quote from: "crazybabyborg"
Sure, but give me a sec...the letters are looking better. I'll post it in a sec, k?


ok


Title: Lively Case Discussion #561 12/16 - 12/18/2006
Post by: crazybabyborg on December 17, 2006, 08:39:25 PM
Quote from: "crazybabyborg"
(http://i25.photobucket.com/albums/c100/crazybabyborgs/blah3.jpg)
http://i25.photobucket.com/albums/c100/crazybabyborgs/blah3.jpg

(http://i25.photobucket.com/albums/c100/crazybabyborgs/blah1.jpg)
http://i25.photobucket.com/albums/c100/crazybabyborgs/blah1.jpg

Whichever you want, blah. And please don't feel obligated to use it. It won't hurt my feelings at all if you don't. But you're welcome to!  :wink:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #561 12/16 - 12/18/2006
Post by: Lala'sMom on December 17, 2006, 08:41:25 PM
Why is everyone taking off their clothes in the cage tonight?  Did I miss the memo?  :roll:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #561 12/16 - 12/18/2006
Post by: BTgirl on December 17, 2006, 08:42:34 PM
Quote from: "Lala'sMom"
Why is everyone taking off their clothes in the cage tonight?  Did I miss the memo?  :roll:


It's all about sex, Lalas.  :lol:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #561 12/16 - 12/18/2006
Post by: Sam on December 17, 2006, 08:43:11 PM
Klaas and Altruist,

Thanks so much for transcribing the Skeeter, Deepac video transcript.

What a dissapointment to read that. I know Skeeters is not a professional photographer bu it seemed to me that left a lot to be desired. Also the way he talked to Deepac did not sound to professional to me either but maybe he was trying to talk down to him because of the language difference.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #561 12/16 - 12/18/2006
Post by: blah on December 17, 2006, 08:43:17 PM
Quote from: "crazybabyborg"
Quote from: "crazybabyborg"
(http://i25.photobucket.com/albums/c100/crazybabyborgs/blah3.jpg)
http://i25.photobucket.com/albums/c100/crazybabyborgs/blah3.jpg

(http://i25.photobucket.com/albums/c100/crazybabyborgs/blah1.jpg)
http://i25.photobucket.com/albums/c100/crazybabyborgs/blah1.jpg

Whichever you want, blah. And please don't feel obligated to use it. It won't hurt my feelings at all if you don't. But you're welcome to!  :wink:


got it, thanks !!!


Title: Lively Case Discussion #561 12/16 - 12/18/2006
Post by: crazybabyborg on December 17, 2006, 08:43:22 PM
Quote from: "Lala'sMom"
Why is everyone taking off their clothes in the cage tonight?  Did I miss the memo?  :roll:


Oh God, Lala's.................I'm scared to death I've permenantly disrobed blah. I have SUCH good intentions, honest!  :lol:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #561 12/16 - 12/18/2006
Post by: Lala'sMom on December 17, 2006, 08:43:57 PM
I need my muffs, please.  Can't hear no sex talk...not good for my ears.  No, no, no.   :lol:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #561 12/16 - 12/18/2006
Post by: justinsmama on December 17, 2006, 08:44:29 PM
Hey! Let's start a thread in the lounge about spirituality, huh? C'mon BT and IBE and anyone else interested!


Title: Lively Case Discussion #561 12/16 - 12/18/2006
Post by: crazybabyborg on December 17, 2006, 08:44:38 PM
WHEW!  No, believe me, THANK YOU!!!

I hope there is something on the case tonight...............


Title: Lively Case Discussion #561 12/16 - 12/18/2006
Post by: klaasend on December 17, 2006, 08:45:10 PM
Quote from: "Sam"
Klaas and Altruist,

Thanks so much for transcribing the Skeeter, Deepac video transcript.

What a dissapointment to read that. I know Skeeters is not a professional photographer bu it seemed to me that left a lot to be desired. Also the way he talked to Deepac did not sound to professional to me either but maybe he was trying to talk down to him because of the language difference.

To be clear, we didn't transcribe it.  It was already transcribed over at Scrux.  We simply copied and brought it over here.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #561 12/16 - 12/18/2006
Post by: blah on December 17, 2006, 08:45:40 PM
Quote from: "BTgirl"
Quote from: "Lala'sMom"
Why is everyone taking off their clothes in the cage tonight?  Did I miss the memo?  :roll:


It's all about sex , Lalas.  :lol:


fixed it for ya !!


 :lol:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #561 12/16 - 12/18/2006
Post by: BTgirl on December 17, 2006, 08:46:00 PM
Quote from: "justinsmama"
Hey! Let's start a thread in the lounge about spirituality, huh? C'mon BT and IBE and anyone else interested!


Sure. I had one about reincarnation about a year ago, and some of the posts were very interesting.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #561 12/16 - 12/18/2006
Post by: Angiex911dsptchr on December 17, 2006, 08:46:48 PM
Quote from: "Lala'sMom"
I need my muffs, please.  Can't hear no sex talk...not good for my ears.  No, no, no.   :lol:


  ROFL  Hey. and I didnt even START it either  :)


Title: Lively Case Discussion #561 12/16 - 12/18/2006
Post by: BTgirl on December 17, 2006, 08:47:50 PM
Quote from: "blah"
Quote from: "BTgirl"
Quote from: "Lala'sMom"
Why is everyone taking off their clothes in the cage tonight?  Did I miss the memo?  :roll:


It's all about sex , Lalas.  :lol:


fixed it for ya !!


 :lol:


 :lol:  :lol:  :lol:

Lala's can't stand s-e-x talk.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #561 12/16 - 12/18/2006
Post by: Lala'sMom on December 17, 2006, 08:47:54 PM
Quote from: "crazybabyborg"
Quote from: "Lala'sMom"
Why is everyone taking off their clothes in the cage tonight?  Did I miss the memo?  :roll:


Oh God, Lala's.................I'm scared to death I've permenantly disrobed blah. I have SUCH good intentions, honest!  :lol:


I see Blah is dressed now, but what about our little FOM?  She's always running around in the buff. :roll:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #561 12/16 - 12/18/2006
Post by: Sam on December 17, 2006, 08:49:32 PM
Quote from: "blah"
Quote from: "crazybabyborg"
Sure, but give me a sec...the letters are looking better. I'll post it in a sec, k?


ok


Very nice avatar blah.
Good job Crazybabyborg. Looks like you do stand a chance of being a Klaas when you growup. LOL


Title: Lively Case Discussion #561 12/16 - 12/18/2006
Post by: blah on December 17, 2006, 08:49:44 PM
Quote from: "BTgirl"
Quote from: "blah"
Quote from: "BTgirl"
Quote from: "Lala'sMom"
Why is everyone taking off their clothes in the cage tonight?  Did I miss the memo?  :roll:


It's all about sex , Lalas.  :lol:


fixed it for ya !!


 :lol:


 :lol:  :lol:  :lol:

Lala's can't stand s-e-x talk.


what if Shango was really just talking about sex this whole time???


 :?


Title: Lively Case Discussion #561 12/16 - 12/18/2006
Post by: Lala'sMom on December 17, 2006, 08:50:26 PM
Quote from: "Sam"
Quote from: "blah"
Quote from: "crazybabyborg"
Sure, but give me a sec...the letters are looking better. I'll post it in a sec, k?


ok


Very nice avatar blah.
Good job Crazybabyborg. Looks like you do stand a chance of being a Klaas when you growup. LOL



You're nekky too!  What is the cage coming to these days. :roll:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #561 12/16 - 12/18/2006
Post by: BTgirl on December 17, 2006, 08:51:15 PM
Quote from: "blah"
Quote from: "BTgirl"
Quote from: "blah"
Quote from: "BTgirl"
Quote from: "Lala'sMom"
Why is everyone taking off their clothes in the cage tonight?  Did I miss the memo?  :roll:


It's all about sex , Lalas.  :lol:


fixed it for ya !!


 :lol:


 :lol:  :lol:  :lol:

Lala's can't stand s-e-x talk.


what if Shango was really just talking about sex this whole time???


 :?


OMG, Lalas! What if he was?!  :shock:  :lol:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #561 12/16 - 12/18/2006
Post by: Lala'sMom on December 17, 2006, 08:51:17 PM
Quote from: "blah"
Quote from: "BTgirl"
Quote from: "blah"
Quote from: "BTgirl"
Quote from: "Lala'sMom"
Why is everyone taking off their clothes in the cage tonight?  Did I miss the memo?  :roll:


It's all about sex , Lalas.  :lol:


fixed it for ya !!


 :lol:


 :lol:  :lol:  :lol:

Lala's can't stand s-e-x talk.


what if Shango was really just talking about sex this whole time???


 :?


What is this? Pick on Lala's night?


Title: Lively Case Discussion #561 12/16 - 12/18/2006
Post by: crazybabyborg on December 17, 2006, 08:51:25 PM
Has anyone heard anything from Skeeters since the filings? From Tacky's point of view, ( we all know how reality based THAT is,) it comes down to whether Dr. Phil knew the tape had been altered. That would leave an out for Dr. Phil, but point directly at Skeeter's.

Of course he didn't even consider that it was altered in Holland, or Aruba, or that it is exactly what it appears to be when aired, in meaning anyway.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #561 12/16 - 12/18/2006
Post by: blah on December 17, 2006, 08:53:29 PM
Quote from: "Lala'sMom"
Quote from: "blah"
Quote from: "BTgirl"
Quote from: "blah"
Quote from: "BTgirl"
Quote from: "Lala'sMom"
Why is everyone taking off their clothes in the cage tonight?  Did I miss the memo?  :roll:


It's all about sex , Lalas.  :lol:


fixed it for ya !!


 :lol:


 :lol:  :lol:  :lol:

Lala's can't stand s-e-x talk.


what if Shango was really just talking about sex this whole time???


 :?


What is this? Pick on Lala's night?


Noooooo






well.....









maybe just for a minute



 :lol:  :lol:  :lol:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #561 12/16 - 12/18/2006
Post by: crazybabyborg on December 17, 2006, 08:53:40 PM
Quote from: "Sam"
Quote from: "blah"
Quote from: "crazybabyborg"
Sure, but give me a sec...the letters are looking better. I'll post it in a sec, k?


ok


Very nice avatar blah.
Good job Crazybabyborg. Looks like you do stand a chance of being a Klaas when you growup. LOL


UM-HUM..........pick on me Sam, and I'll teach you! I'll fix you an avatar!  :lol:  Where is yours, btw?


Title: Lively Case Discussion #561 12/16 - 12/18/2006
Post by: Carnut on December 17, 2006, 08:54:11 PM
Quote from: "Sam"
Klaas and Altruist,

Thanks so much for transcribing the Skeeter, Deepac video transcript.

What a dissapointment to read that. I know Skeeters is not a professional photographer bu it seemed to me that left a lot to be desired. Also the way he talked to Deepac did not sound to professional to me either but maybe he was trying to talk down to him because of the language difference.


Yes, it was kinda obvious that Skeeter was trying to get down to the level of Deepak. Aparently he felt it was his best approach at that time for getting info. Don't think it worked as well as he and we would have liked.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #561 12/16 - 12/18/2006
Post by: IndyDan on December 17, 2006, 08:55:17 PM
My 2 cents worth <clink-clink>. I don't think the Kalpoe's initiated the idea for this suit.  They don't impress me as particularly intelligent or even dimly bright family.  They are a welfare family at best with little to no education.
They've sucked off the system their whole lives.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #561 12/16 - 12/18/2006
Post by: BTgirl on December 17, 2006, 08:56:13 PM
Quote from: "Lala'sMom"

What is this? Pick on Lala's night?


Wub you, Lalas.(http://bestsmileys.com/kissing1/25.gif)


Title: Lively Case Discussion #561 12/16 - 12/18/2006
Post by: Lala'sMom on December 17, 2006, 08:56:39 PM
Quote from: "crazybabyborg"
Has anyone heard anything from Skeeters since the filings? From Tacky's point of view, ( we all know how reality based THAT is,) it comes down to whether Dr. Phil knew the tape had been altered. That would leave an out for Dr. Phil, but point directly at Skeeter's.

Of course he didn't even consider that it was altered in Holland, or Aruba, or that it is exactly what it appears to be when aired, in meaning anyway.


I got the impression that Joe T. was a little pleased that Deepak is now throwing himself under the bus.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #561 12/16 - 12/18/2006
Post by: crazybabyborg on December 17, 2006, 08:59:31 PM
Quote from: "Lala'sMom"
Quote from: "crazybabyborg"
Has anyone heard anything from Skeeters since the filings? From Tacky's point of view, ( we all know how reality based THAT is,) it comes down to whether Dr. Phil knew the tape had been altered. That would leave an out for Dr. Phil, but point directly at Skeeter's.

Of course he didn't even consider that it was altered in Holland, or Aruba, or that it is exactly what it appears to be when aired, in meaning anyway.


I got the impression that Joe T. was a little pleased that Deepak is now throwing himself under the bus.


That whole little segment with Tacky was strange to me. It was like Tacky was TRYING to be casual, and passively interested. When he said that his prediction was that the Dr. Phil suit would be dropped and there would be no deposition, I had the feeling he was going to be involved in making that happen behind the scenes. Just a feeling.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #561 12/16 - 12/18/2006
Post by: Carnut on December 17, 2006, 09:01:50 PM
Apparently, from what I'm seeing on TV, the family should hire Denzel Wastington to go to aruba and find out what happened.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #561 12/16 - 12/18/2006
Post by: IndyDan on December 17, 2006, 09:02:08 PM
Quote from: "Lala'sMom"
Quote from: "crazybabyborg"
Has anyone heard anything from Skeeters since the filings? From Tacky's point of view, ( we all know how reality based THAT is,) it comes down to whether Dr. Phil knew the tape had been altered. That would leave an out for Dr. Phil, but point directly at Skeeter's.

Of course he didn't even consider that it was altered in Holland, or Aruba, or that it is exactly what it appears to be when aired, in meaning anyway.


I got the impression that Joe T. was a little pleased that Deepak is now throwing himself under the bus.


You're right Mom, Joe T is so thankful that the attention is off his rapist-murdering client for the moment that he was actually decent.
Even Kim had to make a tongue-in-cheek remark about the greaser being 'fair and balanced'.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #561 12/16 - 12/18/2006
Post by: Sam on December 17, 2006, 09:02:29 PM
Even though I am disssapointed in the transcripts of the tape, I am still not sure that would mean it was altered just the excerps on Dr. Phil were just that, brief excerps.

Interesting about the lawyers though and the fees.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #561 12/16 - 12/18/2006
Post by: Carnut on December 17, 2006, 09:08:10 PM
It does appear that the dimbulbs think the Dr. Phil thing is gonna be their lotto ticket to fame and fortune. Poor fellas.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #561 12/16 - 12/18/2006
Post by: justinsmama on December 17, 2006, 09:10:28 PM
Quote from: "Sam"
Quote from: "blah"
Quote from: "crazybabyborg"
Sure, but give me a sec...the letters are looking better. I'll post it in a sec, k?


ok


Very nice avatar blah.
Good job Crazybabyborg. Looks like you do stand a chance of being a Klaas when you growup. LOL


Sam is nekky too.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #561 12/16 - 12/18/2006
Post by: Carnut on December 17, 2006, 09:10:58 PM
Oh no, the '3 year waranty' commercial again.

'Hey Numnuts if you don't straighten up and fly right, I'm gonna take you back and exchange you for one that works right'.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #561 12/16 - 12/18/2006
Post by: Sam on December 17, 2006, 09:12:05 PM
Quote from: "crazybabyborg"
Quote from: "Sam"
Quote from: "blah"
Quote from: "crazybabyborg"
Sure, but give me a sec...the letters are looking better. I'll post it in a sec, k?


ok


Very nice avatar blah.
Good job Crazybabyborg. Looks like you do stand a chance of being a Klaas when you growup. LOL


UM-HUM..........pick on me Sam, and I'll teach you! I'll fix you an avatar!  :lol:  Where is yours, btw?


Crazybabyborg,
I used a cigarette smoking male monkey donated to me by Getagrip when she used to post with us. When we lost our avatars after a crash I decided I really did not want to use that one again because I had already let it be know I was a female. But Klaas did put that one on the tree.

I have been watching for the cats Anna was going to post in the lounge. I have not seen them yet. I was hoping there would be one that looked all female. LOL


Title: Lively Case Discussion #561 12/16 - 12/18/2006
Post by: IndyDan on December 17, 2006, 09:12:55 PM
Joe T's legacy to his kids is going to be that he was a smart attorney who represented some of the most evil people on earth.  
He used his lawyer skills to try get some of the worst scumbags on earth a free ticket to kidnap, rape and murder again.
Someday his kids will grow up and form their own opinion of what these animals did to Natalee Holloway and how their dad stepped in to try to help them get away with it.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #561 12/16 - 12/18/2006
Post by: Carnut on December 17, 2006, 09:14:23 PM
Quote from: "IndyDan"
Joe T's legacy to his kids is going to be that he was a smart attorney who represented some of the most evil people on earth.  
He used his lawyer skills to try get some of the worst scumbags on earth a free ticket to kidnap, rape and murder again.
Someday his kids will grow up and form their own opinion of what these animals did to Natalee Holloway and how their dad stepped in to try to help them get away with it.


Humm, maybe to some folks money means more than what the kids think.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #561 12/16 - 12/18/2006
Post by: Lala'sMom on December 17, 2006, 09:15:52 PM
Just exactly how much money would it take to pay all these attorneys and file this thing anyway?


Title: Lively Case Discussion #561 12/16 - 12/18/2006
Post by: IndyDan on December 17, 2006, 09:17:22 PM
Quote from: "Carnut"
Quote from: "IndyDan"
Joe T's legacy to his kids is going to be that he was a smart attorney who represented some of the most evil people on earth.  
He used his lawyer skills to try get some of the worst scumbags on earth a free ticket to kidnap, rape and murder again.
Someday his kids will grow up and form their own opinion of what these animals did to Natalee Holloway and how their dad stepped in to try to help them get away with it.


Humm, maybe to some folks money means more than what the kids think.

Glad you got the point.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #561 12/16 - 12/18/2006
Post by: justinsmama on December 17, 2006, 09:17:53 PM
Have you ever tried to do therapy with someone who is not too terribly close to the norm on intelligence? It is extremely difficult, if not damn near impossible to do. At least, not the usual "talk", insight oriented therapy or even cognitive behavioral therapy. Generally, such folks instead benefit most from a very directive (though kind) approach. It is with those clients only that I actually tell them what to do. And even at that, my "directions" are very small, one to two step behaviors that I instruct the client to perform.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #561 12/16 - 12/18/2006
Post by: Carnut on December 17, 2006, 09:20:50 PM
Quote from: "justinsmama"
Have you ever tried to do therapy with someone who is not too terribly close to the norm on intelligence? It is extremely difficult, if not damn near impossible to do. At least, not the usual "talk", insight oriented therapy or even cognitive behavioral therapy. Generally, such folks instead benefit most from a very directive (though kind) approach. It is with those clients only that I actually tell them what to do. And even at that, my "directions" are very small, one to two step behaviors that I instruct the client to perform.


Hummm, are you saying that substance abusers tend toward not being too terribly close to the norm on intelligence?


Title: Lively Case Discussion #561 12/16 - 12/18/2006
Post by: Lala'sMom on December 17, 2006, 09:21:03 PM
What I noticed on those tapes that stood out for me was Deepak's English.  It wasn't as bad as I thought it would be given he and Joran were speaking Dutch in the car that night with Natalee.   :roll:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #561 12/16 - 12/18/2006
Post by: Tamikosmom on December 17, 2006, 09:21:56 PM
Quote from: "crazybabyborg"
Has anyone heard anything from Skeeters since the filings? From Tacky's point of view, ( we all know how reality based THAT is,) it comes down to whether Dr. Phil knew the tape had been altered. That would leave an out for Dr. Phil, but point directly at Skeeter's.

Of course he didn't even consider that it was altered in Holland, or Aruba, or that it is exactly what it appears to be when aired, in meaning anyway.


"I am inclined to believe Greta" regarding the following statement and .... believe me, that is a first in a looooong time.   :wink:

Janet.

 
http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,177286,00.html
December 1, 2005

Greta Van Susteren

We are also curious what the FBI has to say about the content of this interview. I was told by Jamie Skeeters on the phone the other night that he originally "taped" this interview directly to his computer hard drive and that he gave the hard drive to the FBI. Of course this hard drive — the "original" — is what will tell us exactly what was said or not said — provided it can be adequately enhanced and analyzed. We don't have access to that hard drive so even after evaluating all the tapes and CD's given us, there could still remain in my mind some question

_________________

The Reason for the Season

(http://img90.imageshack.us/img90/7092/nativityfh0.jpg)


Title: Lively Case Discussion #561 12/16 - 12/18/2006
Post by: crazybabyborg on December 17, 2006, 09:22:13 PM
Quote from: "Sam"
Quote from: "crazybabyborg"
Quote from: "Sam"
Quote from: "blah"
Quote from: "crazybabyborg"
Sure, but give me a sec...the letters are looking better. I'll post it in a sec, k?


ok


Very nice avatar blah.
Good job Crazybabyborg. Looks like you do stand a chance of being a Klaas when you growup. LOL


UM-HUM..........pick on me Sam, and I'll teach you! I'll fix you an avatar!  :lol:  Where is yours, btw?


Crazybabyborg,
I used a cigarette smoking male monkey donated to me by Getagrip when she used to post with us. When we lost our avatars after a crash I decided I really did not want to use that one again because I had already let it be know I was a female. But Klaas did put that one on the tree.

I have been watching for the cats Anna was going to post in the lounge. I have not seen them yet. I was hoping there would be one that looked all female. LOL


Let me see what I can find..........I search pretty well, but Klaas rescues me more often than not in the execution!  :lol:
I'll post some options in a minute, k?
Klaas............I gave the "Indy" animation a wreath for the front of the motorcycle. Looks really good in Imageready. I have no idea how to save it so it can go to photobucket!
BRB


Title: Lively Case Discussion #561 12/16 - 12/18/2006
Post by: justinsmama on December 17, 2006, 09:22:13 PM
Quote from: "Carnut"
Quote from: "justinsmama"
Have you ever tried to do therapy with someone who is not too terribly close to the norm on intelligence? It is extremely difficult, if not damn near impossible to do. At least, not the usual "talk", insight oriented therapy or even cognitive behavioral therapy. Generally, such folks instead benefit most from a very directive (though kind) approach. It is with those clients only that I actually tell them what to do. And even at that, my "directions" are very small, one to two step behaviors that I instruct the client to perform.


Hummm, are you saying that substance abusers tend toward not being too terribly close to the norm on intelligence?


LMAO! If that were the case, I would not have the level of education and highly developed talents that I do!


Title: Lively Case Discussion #561 12/16 - 12/18/2006
Post by: Carnut on December 17, 2006, 09:23:29 PM
Quote from: "Lala'sMom"
What I noticed on those tapes that stood out for me was Deepak's English.  It wasn't as bad as I thought it would be given he and Joran were speaking Dutch in the car that night with Natalee.   :roll:


Yeah, but, I still think they all have big problems with pronouns, adjectives and tense.

I think that's been a big contributor to a lot of misunderstandings in what's been said by those folks in the various intermediate translations of things.

He and She almost seem interchangeable down there, as well as He and They.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #561 12/16 - 12/18/2006
Post by: klaasend on December 17, 2006, 09:27:45 PM
CBB - Choose "saved as optimized" and it should work..give that a shot.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #561 12/16 - 12/18/2006
Post by: crazybabyborg on December 17, 2006, 09:33:02 PM
(http://i25.photobucket.com/albums/c100/crazybabyborgs/img212.gif)

Do You Like This?


Title: Lively Case Discussion #561 12/16 - 12/18/2006
Post by: IBE on December 17, 2006, 09:34:34 PM
Gee, I order pizza and miss out on all the "sex stuff"

If Shango was about sex, the Code Talkers might have broken the code faster :lol:  :lol:  :lol:

Klass, I need to go back on the CarePress site... I somehow missed all the neat colors.

Love the burgandy and the navy blue


Title: Lively Case Discussion #561 12/16 - 12/18/2006
Post by: crazybabyborg on December 17, 2006, 09:36:01 PM
(http://i25.photobucket.com/albums/c100/crazybabyborgs/IndyDan-1.gif)

HEY!! Is Klaas good or what!


Title: Lively Case Discussion #561 12/16 - 12/18/2006
Post by: klaasend on December 17, 2006, 09:42:53 PM
CBB - Excellent!  Fun to play with the animations isn't it?   :lol:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #561 12/16 - 12/18/2006
Post by: Sam on December 17, 2006, 09:44:39 PM
Quote from: "crazybabyborg"
(http://i25.photobucket.com/albums/c100/crazybabyborgs/img212.gif)

Do You Like This?


Oh that is adorable. I went to the lounge and picked one of Anna's but actually like the one you did better. Please , please help me post it. Thanks


Title: Lively Case Discussion #561 12/16 - 12/18/2006
Post by: SunFreak2 on December 17, 2006, 09:45:15 PM
Quote from: "Lala'sMom"



You're nekky too!  What is the cage coming to these days. :roll:


Hi all you magnificent monkeys!  I come in the cage today after being absent for a few days and start reading about nekky monkeys.  Now, I'm not sure whether I'm glad I missed it or not!  :wink:  :wink:  :lol:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #561 12/16 - 12/18/2006
Post by: crazybabyborg on December 17, 2006, 09:46:29 PM
Quote from: "klaasend"
CBB - Excellent!  Fun to play with the animations isn't it?   :lol:


Not yet. It's more frustrating than anything else, but I can see the potential for fun!! I wouldn't even try if you weren't around, and I surely do appreciate your patience!


Title: Lively Case Discussion #561 12/16 - 12/18/2006
Post by: SunFreak2 on December 17, 2006, 09:48:53 PM
Quote from: "BTgirl"
Quote from: "Sam"
Knight In Shining Armor by Jude Deveraux
....


Thanks, Sam!


I read that book and loved it!


Title: Lively Case Discussion #561 12/16 - 12/18/2006
Post by: crazybabyborg on December 17, 2006, 09:49:18 PM
Quote from: "Sam"
Quote from: "crazybabyborg"
(http://i25.photobucket.com/albums/c100/crazybabyborgs/img212.gif)

Do You Like This?


Oh that is adorable. I went to the lounge and picked one of Anna's but actually like the one you did better. Please , please help me post it. Thanks


(http://i25.photobucket.com/albums/c100/crazybabyborgs/img212.gif)
http://i25.photobucket.com/albums/c100/crazybabyborgs/img212.gif

Copy the link. Go into your profile and paste the link in the third box ( in the avatar section of your profile)
Submit it.  :wink:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #561 12/16 - 12/18/2006
Post by: klaasend on December 17, 2006, 09:50:07 PM
(http://i37.photobucket.com/albums/e82/klaasend2/SamXmasCat1.gif)

http://i37.photobucket.com/albums/e82/klaasend2/SamXmasCat1.gif


Title: Lively Case Discussion #561 12/16 - 12/18/2006
Post by: klaasend on December 17, 2006, 09:50:58 PM
Quote from: "SunFreak2"
Quote from: "BTgirl"
Quote from: "Sam"
Knight In Shining Armor by Jude Deveraux
....


Thanks, Sam!


I read that book and loved it!

Hi Sunfreak!  How are you feeling?  Better I hope!


Title: Lively Case Discussion #561 12/16 - 12/18/2006
Post by: crazybabyborg on December 17, 2006, 09:54:45 PM
Klaas............that looks too big. I resized to avatar in photobucket.........

Lord, Help!  :oops:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #561 12/16 - 12/18/2006
Post by: Florida on December 17, 2006, 09:55:53 PM
Michael Posner claims to have been away until the day after Natalee's disappearance.

I've never heard this before:  That within days, he was in Mexico....
Does anyone know where in Mexico?


Then within weeks, he left Aruba permanently.  :?


Title: Lively Case Discussion #561 12/16 - 12/18/2006
Post by: klaasend on December 17, 2006, 09:56:24 PM
Quote from: "crazybabyborg"
Klaas............that looks too big. I resized to avatar in photobucket.........

Lord, Help!  :oops:


Resize it in photoshop and reload it.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #561 12/16 - 12/18/2006
Post by: klaasend on December 17, 2006, 09:57:36 PM
Quote from: "Florida"
Michael Posner claims to have been away until the day after Natalee's disappearance.

I've never heard this before:  That within days, he was in Mexico....
Does anyone know where in Mexico?


Then within weeks, he left Aruba permanently.  :?

Are you sure about this?  Wasn't he given some kind of award late in 2005?


Title: Lively Case Discussion #561 12/16 - 12/18/2006
Post by: crazybabyborg on December 17, 2006, 10:01:32 PM
(http://i25.photobucket.com/albums/c100/crazybabyborgs/christmaskitty.gif)
http://i25.photobucket.com/albums/c100/crazybabyborgs/christmaskitty.gif

OK, sorry. NOW

Copy the link,
go to profile
paste in the third box ( in avatar section)
submit


Title: Lively Case Discussion #561 12/16 - 12/18/2006
Post by: Florida on December 17, 2006, 10:01:40 PM
This is what I was told in Aruba...... :?
Any idea about this Mexico area?


Title: Lively Case Discussion #561 12/16 - 12/18/2006
Post by: SunFreak2 on December 17, 2006, 10:01:48 PM
Quote from: "klaasend"
Quote from: "Florida"
Michael Posner claims to have been away until the day after Natalee's disappearance.

I've never heard this before:  That within days, he was in Mexico....
Does anyone know where in Mexico?


Then within weeks, he left Aruba permanently.  :?

Are you sure about this?  Wasn't he given some kind of award late in 2005?


I remember he was MAN OF THE YEAR and KJ was WOMAN OF THE YEAR.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #561 12/16 - 12/18/2006
Post by: Sam on December 17, 2006, 10:03:10 PM
Quote from: "SunFreak2"
Quote from: "BTgirl"
Quote from: "Sam"
Knight In Shining Armor by Jude Deveraux
....


Thanks, Sam!


I read that book and loved it!


Looky I am not nekked anymore. Thanks to Crazybabyborg.

I had read Klaas's directions a million times and was not sure I understood them or could do it. Thanks to all the helpful Monkeys in here.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #561 12/16 - 12/18/2006
Post by: crazybabyborg on December 17, 2006, 10:03:12 PM
It worked, Sam! I'm more surprised than you are!  :lol:  You look great!


Title: T-shirts
Post by: IBE on December 17, 2006, 10:03:32 PM
Klaas when I go into CafePress I only see black t shirts on the link where it says Christmas Tree

Where did you find the burgandy one and the navy blue one?


Title: Lively Case Discussion #561 12/16 - 12/18/2006
Post by: klaasend on December 17, 2006, 10:03:44 PM
Quote from: "Florida"
This is what I was told in Aruba...... :?
Any idea about this Mexico area?

Nope


Title: Re: T-shirts
Post by: klaasend on December 17, 2006, 10:05:16 PM
Quote from: "IBE"
Klaas when I go into CafePress I only see black t shirts on the link where it says Christmas Tree

Where did you find the burgandy one and the navy blue one?


Right here - dark t-shirt.  Then you can choose from the different dark colors:

http://www.cafepress.com/scaredmonkeys.93781772


Title: Lively Case Discussion #561 12/16 - 12/18/2006
Post by: klaasend on December 17, 2006, 10:06:40 PM
SAM - you look great!


Title: Lively Case Discussion #561 12/16 - 12/18/2006
Post by: the big hammer on December 17, 2006, 10:07:26 PM
Posner In Mexico?

Florida writes: Michael Posner claims to have been away until the day after Natalee's disappearance. I've never heard this before: That within days, he was in Mexico.... Does anyone know where in Mexico?

Never heard that.

Thought his lawyer said Posner was in Chicago the day and nite of Natalee's disappearance.

Didn't Skeeters get his face all cut up in Cancun during a hurricane?

.


Title: Thanks Bingo Hard Disk drive
Post by: IBE on December 17, 2006, 10:08:17 PM
Thanks, it was a "duh" moment!


Title: Lively Case Discussion #561 12/16 - 12/18/2006
Post by: klaasend on December 17, 2006, 10:08:19 PM
Quote from: "the big hammer"
Posner In Mexico?

Florida writes: Michael Posner claims to have been away until the day after Natalee's disappearance. I've never heard this before: That within days, he was in Mexico.... Does anyone know where in Mexico?

Never heard that.

Thought his lawyer said Posner was in Chicago the day and nite of Natalee's disappearance.

Didn't Skeeters get his face all cut up in Cancun during a hurricane?

.


Yes


Title: Lively Case Discussion #561 12/16 - 12/18/2006
Post by: SunFreak2 on December 17, 2006, 10:10:36 PM
Quote from: "klaasend"

Hi Sunfreak!  How are you feeling?  Better I hope!


As best as I can with strep throat, bronchitis, sinusitis and an ear infection!!  I'm taking a Z-pak back to back.  I have another Psuedomonas infection in my incision.  Other than that I'm GREAT!  

Sat on the balconey in the sun today - was wonderful and warm.
I'm taking life one day at a time.  Each new day means another day of healing.  I am so greatful that I'm not having to deal with cancer as well as all the other stuff.  The odds are anything over a few inches is usually cancer and mine was 10" x 5".   God's keeping me here on Earth to aggravate the bashers, I guess!  LOL.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #561 12/16 - 12/18/2006
Post by: Florida on December 17, 2006, 10:11:57 PM
Posner says it was he who voluntarily turned over this casino surveillance tape to Aruban authorities and that he is furious they have allowed ABC News to broadcast it. Posner says he has paid the expenses for private investigators to come here and assist in the search for Holloway

Huh?  What private investigators?


Title: Lively Case Discussion #561 12/16 - 12/18/2006
Post by: BTgirl on December 17, 2006, 10:12:43 PM
Quote from: "SunFreak2"
Quote from: "klaasend"

Hi Sunfreak!  How are you feeling?  Better I hope!


As best as I can with strep throat, bronchitis, sinusitis and an ear infection!!  I'm taking a Z-pak back to back.  I have another Psuedomonas infection in my incision.  Other than that I'm GREAT!  

Sat on the balconey in the sun today - was wonderful and warm.
I'm taking life one day at a time.  Each new day means another day of healing.  I am so greatful that I'm not having to deal with cancer as well as all the other stuff.  The odds are anything over a few inches is usually cancer and mine was 10" x 5".   God's keeping me here on Earth to aggravate the bashers, I guess!  LOL.


Hugs, SunFreak. You are a tough cookie and should be very proud of your strength. I hope you feel better every day.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #561 12/16 - 12/18/2006
Post by: klaasend on December 17, 2006, 10:15:31 PM
Quote from: "SunFreak2"
Quote from: "klaasend"

Hi Sunfreak!  How are you feeling?  Better I hope!


As best as I can with strep throat, bronchitis, sinusitis and an ear infection!!  I'm taking a Z-pak back to back.  I have another Psuedomonas infection in my incision.  Other than that I'm GREAT!  

Sat on the balconey in the sun today - was wonderful and warm.
I'm taking life one day at a time.  Each new day means another day of healing.  I am so greatful that I'm not having to deal with cancer as well as all the other stuff.  The odds are anything over a few inches is usually cancer and mine was 10" x 5".   God's keeping me here on Earth to aggravate the bashers, I guess!  LOL.

Geeze - sorry to hear about all the infections, hope that z-pak works for you!  Yes, you are extreemly lucky it wasn't cancerous.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #561 12/16 - 12/18/2006
Post by: SunFreak2 on December 17, 2006, 10:20:49 PM
Quote from: "BTgirl"


Hugs, SunFreak. You are a tough cookie and should be very proud of your strength. I hope you feel better every day.


Hey, BT, thank you! I'll take all the hugs I can get.  I'm a tough Italian cookie!  LOL.

BTW, I saw flannel sock monkey sheets and a sock monkey comforter at Target the other day.  I had a sock monkey when I was a kid.  I named him "Gabby Hayes".


Title: Lively Case Discussion #561 12/16 - 12/18/2006
Post by: Sam on December 17, 2006, 10:24:14 PM
Yes Sunfreak, take good care of yourself. Your doggies and the Monkeys need you.

Klaas ,I loved the kitty you posted also. My last kitty of 17 years was white. You should keep that one for maybe Tamikossmom. She is nekky too.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #561 12/16 - 12/18/2006
Post by: BTgirl on December 17, 2006, 10:24:28 PM
Quote from: "SunFreak2"
Quote from: "BTgirl"


Hugs, SunFreak. You are a tough cookie and should be very proud of your strength. I hope you feel better every day.


Hey, BT, thank you! I'll take all the hugs I can get.  I'm a tough Italian cookie!  LOL.

BTW, I saw flannel sock monkey sheets and a sock monkey comforter at Target the other day.  I had a sock monkey when I was a kid.  I named him "Gabby Hayes".


Awwww....too cute! I wish they made those sock monkey sheets in something besides flannel. Mr. BT says he can't sleep on flannel - his jammies stick to the sheets and make it hard for him to roll over.  :lol:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #561 12/16 - 12/18/2006
Post by: klaasend on December 17, 2006, 10:25:21 PM
Quote from: "Sam"
Yes Sunfreak, take good care of yourself. Your doggies and the Monkeys need you.

Klaas ,I loved the kitty you posted also. My last kitty of 17 years was white. You should keep that one for maybe Tamikossmom. She is nekky too.

Thanks - yes anyone who wants it can take it.  You look so cute now! :lol:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #561 12/16 - 12/18/2006
Post by: Carnut on December 17, 2006, 10:26:29 PM
Quote from: "BTgirl"
Quote from: "SunFreak2"
Quote from: "BTgirl"


Hugs, SunFreak. You are a tough cookie and should be very proud of your strength. I hope you feel better every day.


Hey, BT, thank you! I'll take all the hugs I can get.  I'm a tough Italian cookie!  LOL.

BTW, I saw flannel sock monkey sheets and a sock monkey comforter at Target the other day.  I had a sock monkey when I was a kid.  I named him "Gabby Hayes".


Awwww....too cute! I wish they made those sock monkey sheets in something besides flannel. Mr. BT says he can't sleep on flannel - his jammies stick to the sheets and make it hard for him to roll over.  :lol:


Well, guess there's something to be said for sleeping without jammies.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #561 12/16 - 12/18/2006
Post by: BTgirl on December 17, 2006, 10:28:33 PM
Quote from: "Carnut"

Well, guess there's something to be said for sleeping without jammies.


LOL, Carnut. Are we back to the topic of nekky people again?


Title: Lively Case Discussion #561 12/16 - 12/18/2006
Post by: SunFreak2 on December 17, 2006, 10:30:09 PM
Quote from: "BTgirl"
Quote from: "SunFreak2"

BTW, I saw flannel sock monkey sheets and a sock monkey comforter at Target the other day.  I had a sock monkey when I was a kid.  I named him "Gabby Hayes".


Awwww....too cute! I wish they made those sock monkey sheets in something besides flannel. Mr. BT says he can't sleep on flannel - his jammies stick to the sheets and make it hard for him to roll over.  :lol:


Maybe Mr ToothBrush BT should wear satin jammies and then he wouldn't have trouble rolling over in bed.  BTW, I laughed so hard when I read what you wrote, I got a coughing fit and almost wet my pants.    :lol:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #561 12/16 - 12/18/2006
Post by: bleachedblack on December 17, 2006, 10:30:10 PM
Quote from: "Florida"
This is what I was told in Aruba...... :?
Any idea about this Mexico area?


Evening Monkeys,

Florida I have heard differing accounts of MP's wherabouts. Initially I was hearing that he was indeed there in Aruba while Natalee was there, and that he disappeared "the same week " she did. I believe it was on the first Dr. Phil show even that MP was mentioned along with the fact that he went....or was in Mexico. Don't recall if a location/town was mentioned. hard to verify......Can we find a transcript of the show? I have the first Dr. Phil show on tape, but can't watch it until tomorrow.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #561 12/16 - 12/18/2006
Post by: Carnut on December 17, 2006, 10:30:22 PM
Quote from: "BTgirl"
Quote from: "Carnut"

Well, guess there's something to be said for sleeping without jammies.


LOL, Carnut. Are we back to the topic of nekky people again?


Dunno, but sure wish all the ladies in my life would stop calling my 'Dinky'.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #561 12/16 - 12/18/2006
Post by: Carnut on December 17, 2006, 10:30:57 PM
errr, stop calling me 'Dinky'.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #561 12/16 - 12/18/2006
Post by: BTgirl on December 17, 2006, 10:35:22 PM
Quote from: "Carnut"
errr, stop calling me 'Dinky'.



(http://the-jurybox.com/TJB/Smileys/default/hahaha.gif)(http://the-jurybox.com/TJB/Smileys/default/hahaha.gif)


Title: Lively Case Discussion #561 12/16 - 12/18/2006
Post by: SunFreak2 on December 17, 2006, 10:36:26 PM
Quote from: "Carnut"
Quote from: "BTgirl"


Awwww....too cute! I wish they made those sock monkey sheets in something besides flannel. Mr. BT says he can't sleep on flannel - his jammies stick to the sheets and make it hard for him to roll over.  :lol:


Well, guess there's something to be said for sleeping without jammies.


Of course there is!  But what happens when there is an emergency?  You know how our Mothers always taught us to wear clean underwear in case there was an emergency.

My Mother was beaming proud from Heaven when my wound opened and I was rushed to the hospital b/c I was wearing brand new undies.  I don't know what difference makes as a lot of time your clothes have to be cut off of you anyways.  I worked in ER for years and never remarked about anyones undies.  :roll:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #561 12/16 - 12/18/2006
Post by: crazybabyborg on December 17, 2006, 10:36:57 PM
(http://i25.photobucket.com/albums/c100/crazybabyborgs/BigHammer.jpg)

Big Hammer?


Title: Lively Case Discussion #561 12/16 - 12/18/2006
Post by: msmarple on December 17, 2006, 10:38:53 PM
Quote from: "SunFreak2"
Quote from: "klaasend"

Hi Sunfreak!  How are you feeling?  Better I hope!


As best as I can with strep throat, bronchitis, sinusitis and an ear infection!!  I'm taking a Z-pak back to back.  I have another Psuedomonas infection in my incision.  Other than that I'm GREAT!  

Sat on the balconey in the sun today - was wonderful and warm.
I'm taking life one day at a time.  Each new day means another day of healing.  I am so greatful that I'm not having to deal with cancer as well as all the other stuff.  The odds are anything over a few inches is usually cancer and mine was 10" x 5".   God's keeping me here on Earth to aggravate the bashers, I guess!  LOL.


Shoutout to SunFreak - Okay, you win - your cold is worst than mine!

Florida, Altruist, Leslie - I posted some of your comments about "Baby D" and Ruth/Rita  bank/maid on the M&C thread. Have we deciphered whether the baby's death is being officially called a "murder" or an accident - maybe negligence? The original article, I think, indicated a fractured skull that proved fatal. (Best as I could translate it online; you know what that's like ... )


Title: Lively Case Discussion #561 12/16 - 12/18/2006
Post by: crazybabyborg on December 17, 2006, 10:39:13 PM
Quote from: "SunFreak2"
Quote from: "Carnut"
Quote from: "BTgirl"


Awwww....too cute! I wish they made those sock monkey sheets in something besides flannel. Mr. BT says he can't sleep on flannel - his jammies stick to the sheets and make it hard for him to roll over.  :lol:


Well, guess there's something to be said for sleeping without jammies.


Of course there is!  But what happens when there is an emergency?  You know how our Mothers always taught us to wear clean underwear in case there was an emergency.

My Mother was beaming proud from Heaven when my wound opened and I was rushed to the hospital b/c I was wearing brand new undies.  I don't know what difference makes as a lot of time your clothes have to be cut off of you anyways.  I worked in ER for years and never remarked about anyones undies.  :roll:


As Bill Cosby would say,
" Look, if you're in a truck, and you see another truck headed straight for you, it doesn't matter whether it actually hits you or not. First you SAY it, then you DO it!"


Title: Lively Case Discussion #561 12/16 - 12/18/2006
Post by: SunFreak2 on December 17, 2006, 10:39:23 PM
Quote from: "Carnut"
Quote from: "BTgirl"
Quote from: "Carnut"

Well, guess there's something to be said for sleeping without jammies.


LOL, Carnut. Are we back to the topic of nekky people again?


Dunno, but sure wish all the ladies in my life would stop calling me 'Dinky'.


Uh-oh, you've gone and done it now, Dinky, errrrr....CarNut.

 :lol:   :lol:  :lol:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #561 12/16 - 12/18/2006
Post by: Carnut on December 17, 2006, 10:40:27 PM
Quote from: "SunFreak2"
Quote from: "Carnut"
Quote from: "BTgirl"


Awwww....too cute! I wish they made those sock monkey sheets in something besides flannel. Mr. BT says he can't sleep on flannel - his jammies stick to the sheets and make it hard for him to roll over.  :lol:


Well, guess there's something to be said for sleeping without jammies.


Of course there is!  But what happens when there is an emergency?  You know how our Mothers always taught us to wear clean underwear in case there was an emergency.

My Mother was beaming proud from Heaven when my wound opened and I was rushed to the hospital b/c I was wearing brand new undies.  I don't know what difference makes as a lot of time your clothes have to be cut off of you anyways.  I worked in ER for years and never remarked about anyones undies.  :roll:


Yeah, I change mine at least once a week.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #561 12/16 - 12/18/2006
Post by: Florida on December 17, 2006, 10:40:36 PM
BleachedBlack:  Thanks!

This "Mexico" vacation of M. Posner's is new to me....
It fits other theories I've read.
If I could pinpoint it...it would really help.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #561 12/16 - 12/18/2006
Post by: BTgirl on December 17, 2006, 10:41:03 PM
Quote from: "SunFreak2"
Quote from: "Carnut"
Quote from: "BTgirl"


Awwww....too cute! I wish they made those sock monkey sheets in something besides flannel. Mr. BT says he can't sleep on flannel - his jammies stick to the sheets and make it hard for him to roll over.  :lol:


Well, guess there's something to be said for sleeping without jammies.


Of course there is!  But what happens when there is an emergency?  You know how our Mothers always taught us to wear clean underwear in case there was an emergency.

My Mother was beaming proud from Heaven when my wound opened and I was rushed to the hospital b/c I was wearing brand new undies.  I don't know what difference makes as a lot of time your clothes have to be cut off of you anyways.  I worked in ER for years and never remarked about anyones undies.  :roll:


(http://the-jurybox.com/TJB/Smileys/default/24hug.gif) (http://the-jurybox.com/TJB/Smileys/default/24.gif)


Title: Lively Case Discussion #561 12/16 - 12/18/2006
Post by: SunFreak2 on December 17, 2006, 10:41:55 PM
Quote from: "msmarple"


Shoutout to SunFreak - Okay, you win - your cold is worst than mine!


I'll trade ya!


Title: Lively Case Discussion #561 12/16 - 12/18/2006
Post by: SunFreak2 on December 17, 2006, 10:44:58 PM
Quote from: "Carnut"
Quote from: "SunFreak2"


 You know how our Mothers always taught us to wear clean underwear in case there was an emergency.

My Mother was beaming proud from Heaven when my wound opened and I was rushed to the hospital b/c I was wearing brand new undies.  I don't know what difference makes as a lot of time your clothes have to be cut off of you anyways.  I worked in ER for years and never remarked about anyones undies.  :roll:


Yeah, I change mine at least once a week.


Should we call you Dinky and Stinky?

 :lol:  :lol:  :wink:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #561 12/16 - 12/18/2006
Post by: Carnut on December 17, 2006, 10:47:48 PM
Quote from: "SunFreak2"
Quote from: "Carnut"
Quote from: "SunFreak2"


 You know how our Mothers always taught us to wear clean underwear in case there was an emergency.

My Mother was beaming proud from Heaven when my wound opened and I was rushed to the hospital b/c I was wearing brand new undies.  I don't know what difference makes as a lot of time your clothes have to be cut off of you anyways.  I worked in ER for years and never remarked about anyones undies.  :roll:


Yeah, I change mine at least once a week.


Should we call you Dinky and Stinky?

 :lol:  :lol:  :wink:


Well, now, I'm a little offended, they really don't get stinky till after a month or so. Kinda why I started changing once a week whether they need it or not.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #561 12/16 - 12/18/2006
Post by: Sam on December 17, 2006, 10:48:39 PM
Quote from: "crazybabyborg"
(http://i25.photobucket.com/albums/c100/crazybabyborgs/BigHammer.jpg)

Big Hammer?


That would be perfect for him. We have some carpenter contractor friends. One of them has a Christmas tree in his office decorated with tools of the trade. Measuring tapes even nails and screws and hammers and drills. Really cute.  I doubt if we will get Big Hammer to have an avatar though. I saw he was on but did not see a post by him.

Bleached Black,
 if my memory serves me right, back at the beginning of the case it was said Michael Posner returned to Aruba the day after Natalee disappeared.
Until very recently I had never heard he had left. I wonder if Jossy knows?


Title: Lively Case Discussion #561 12/16 - 12/18/2006
Post by: klaasend on December 17, 2006, 10:49:39 PM
Quote from: "bleachedblack"
Quote from: "Florida"
This is what I was told in Aruba...... :?
Any idea about this Mexico area?


Evening Monkeys,

Florida I have heard differing accounts of MP's wherabouts. Initially I was hearing that he was indeed there in Aruba while Natalee was there, and that he disappeared "the same week " she did. I believe it was on the first Dr. Phil show even that MP was mentioned along with the fact that he went....or was in Mexico. Don't recall if a location/town was mentioned. hard to verify......Can we find a transcript of the show? I have the first Dr. Phil show on tape, but can't watch it until tomorrow.

I have the complete transcript of the Dr. Phil/Skeeter's tape show.  Remember the guy in the audience from Aruba?

McGRAW: And where is Ingmar? Is Ingmar here? Ingmar's the cameraman that's been really helpful in getting a lot of things done.
And you're an Aruban resident, right?

INGMAR: Right. I'm an Aruban resident.

McGRAW: You're one of the good guys.

INGMAR: Yes, sir.

McGRAW: OK, so tell us about this particular document, which I have seen, I've seen the signatures.

INGMAR: Right.

McGRAW: I--I can't read it, of course, because it's not translated, but tell
us about that.

INGMAR: This is a statement where the police, the four policemen that were doing the investigation at the time put on paper what Joran just told them, and where Joran was telling that he--he was with Natalee at the fisherman hut. They laid down on the beach together. On a certain moment, she fell asleep. Then he walks away, leaving her alone on the beach. And the next statement that he gave is that he can--he can point to the policeman, `Where's the place that Deepak buried the body.' So--so he was, like, telling that he knows that Deepak did it. He says that he can point to place where he--Deepak Kalpoe buried the body. So actually--and so this was signed by all--all four policemen.

McGRAW: And this is signed by four police officers.

Mr. SKEETERS: And given to the prosecutor on the--for the--the justice system, and not given to the court.

I've been saying all along, the judge can only rule based upon the information they are given by the prosecutor (KJ)


Title: Lively Case Discussion #561 12/16 - 12/18/2006
Post by: Tamikosmom on December 17, 2006, 10:50:37 PM
Quote from: "bleachedblack"
Quote from: "Florida"
This is what I was told in Aruba...... :?
Any idea about this Mexico area?


Evening Monkeys,

Florida I have heard differing accounts of MP's wherabouts. Initially I was hearing that he was indeed there in Aruba while Natalee was there, and that he disappeared "the same week " she did. I believe it was on the first Dr. Phil show even that MP was mentioned along with the fact that he went....or was in Mexico. Don't recall if a location/town was mentioned. hard to verify......Can we find a transcript of the show? I have the first Dr. Phil show on tape, but can't watch it until tomorrow.


The follow are the transcript/overviews of the Dr. Phil Show when Beth Twitty, John Q. Kelly and Steve Cohen were guests.  I could be wrong but I do not remember Michael Posner being a subject of topic throughout this interview.

Janet.



http://www.drphil.com/shows/show/575

http://www.drphil.com/slideshows/slideshow/3041/?id=


Title: Lively Case Discussion #561 12/16 - 12/18/2006
Post by: SunFreak2 on December 17, 2006, 10:55:00 PM
Quote from: "Sam"


Bleached Black,
 if my memory serves me right, back at the beginning of the case it was said Michael Posner returned to Aruba the day after Natalee disappeared.
Until very recently I had never heard he had left. I wonder if Jossy knows?


That's what I always heard too.  I know he was going back and forth to the USA b/c of his involvement in that on-line gaming indictment, but I have never heard he left Aruba on a semi or permanent basis.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #561 12/16 - 12/18/2006
Post by: the big hammer on December 17, 2006, 10:55:07 PM
CrazyBabyBorg --

Thanks for that Christmas Hammer.

I'd be proud if Klaas put it on the SM Christmas Tree.  I saw she has a prominent "name only" listing for me which is wonderful, but less festive, of course.  (But pls don't make me use the avatar; believe it or not, I don't use the quote boxes because I never could get the hang of it...)

Klaas, can CBB's Hammer find a home on/near the tree?  

Thank you, CBB.

And Merry Christmas to you, and to all the Monkeys.

.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #561 12/16 - 12/18/2006
Post by: mishy on December 17, 2006, 10:56:04 PM
Quote from: "justinsmama"
Quote from: "Carnut"
Quote from: "justinsmama"
Have you ever tried to do therapy with someone who is not too terribly close to the norm on intelligence? It is extremely difficult, if not damn near impossible to do. At least, not the usual "talk", insight oriented therapy or even cognitive behavioral therapy. Generally, such folks instead benefit most from a very directive (though kind) approach. It is with those clients only that I actually tell them what to do. And even at that, my "directions" are very small, one to two step behaviors that I instruct the client to perform.


Hummm, are you saying that substance abusers tend toward not being too terribly close to the norm on intelligence?


LMAO! If that were the case, I would not have the level of education and highly developed talents that I do!


LOL Justinsmama!! I was waiting for you to say that...I was about to add, "NO, just the opposite, actually, Carnut..."
 8)  8)  8)  8)  8)  8)  8)


Title: Lively Case Discussion #561 12/16 - 12/18/2006
Post by: SunFreak2 on December 17, 2006, 11:00:31 PM
Quote from: "klaasend"


McGRAW: I--I can't read it, of course, because it's not translated, but tell
us about that.

INGMAR: This is a statement where the police, the four policemen that were doing the investigation at the time put on paper what Joran just told them, and where Joran was telling that he--he was with Natalee at the fisherman hut. They laid down on the beach together. On a certain moment, she fell asleep. Then he walks away, leaving her alone on the beach. And the next statement that he gave is that he can--he can point to the policeman, `Where's the place that Deepak buried the body.' So--so he was, like, telling that he knows that Deepak did it. He says that he can point to place where he--Deepak Kalpoe buried the body. So actually--and so this was signed by all--all four policemen.

McGRAW: And this is signed by four police officers.

Mr. SKEETERS: And given to the prosecutor on the--for the--the justice system, and not given to the court.

I've been saying all along, the judge can only rule based upon the information they are given by the prosecutor (KJ)


This is the statement we heard about for so long, then it finally appeared, but it was never signed by Joran was it?


Title: Lively Case Discussion #561 12/16 - 12/18/2006
Post by: klaasend on December 17, 2006, 11:01:05 PM
Quote from: "the big hammer"
CrazyBabyBorg --

Thanks for that Christmas Hammer.

I'd be proud if Klaas put it on the SM Christmas Tree.  I saw she has a prominent "name only" listing for me which is wonderful, but less festive, of course.  (But pls don't make me use the avatar; believe it or not, I don't use the quote boxes because I never could get the hang of it...)

Klaas, can CBB's Hammer find a home on/near the tree?  

Thank you, CBB.

And Merry Christmas to you, and to all the Monkeys.

.

Hi Hammer - I can put it on the tree picture that I post in here but it's kindof late for the Cafepress stuff.   :wink:

Merry Christmas to you too Hammer.  See my quote above from the Dr. Phil show?


Title: Lively Case Discussion #561 12/16 - 12/18/2006
Post by: BTgirl on December 17, 2006, 11:01:52 PM
Night monkeys.

(http://the-jurybox.com/TJB/Smileys/default/wavey.gif)

(http://the-jurybox.com/TJB/Smileys/default/bed.gif)


Title: Lively Case Discussion #561 12/16 - 12/18/2006
Post by: mishy on December 17, 2006, 11:03:09 PM
Night monkeys!!

SunFreak, please get better soon!!! Great to see ya...

Nighty night all  :lol:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #561 12/16 - 12/18/2006
Post by: SunFreak2 on December 17, 2006, 11:05:28 PM
Quote from: "BTgirl"
Night monkeys.


I'm headed for the bed too!  Nite folks.  Sorry about all the silliness.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #561 12/16 - 12/18/2006
Post by: Sam on December 17, 2006, 11:08:35 PM
well Monkeys time for me to call it a night here.
We had been gone all weekend and the first thing I did when I got home was turn on the computer and come here. Hoping of course always to find some really good news on Natalee for her family. I will continue hoping and praying. Thanks to all for there help tonight.

Sam


Title: Lively Case Discussion #561 12/16 - 12/18/2006
Post by: Florida on December 17, 2006, 11:13:38 PM
Thanks everyone for all the info!.............Nite!


Title: Lively Case Discussion #561 12/16 - 12/18/2006
Post by: Angiex911dsptchr on December 17, 2006, 11:16:48 PM
Quote from: "Lala'sMom"
Quote from: "blah"
Quote from: "BTgirl"
Quote from: "blah"
Quote from: "BTgirl"
Quote from: "Lala'sMom"
Why is everyone taking off their clothes in the cage tonight?  Did I miss the memo?  :roll:


It's all about sex , Lalas.  :lol:


fixed it for ya !!


 :lol:


 :lol:  :lol:  :lol:

Lala's can't stand s-e-x talk.


what if Shango was really just talking about sex this whole time???


 :?


What is this? Pick on Lala's night?


 No.. :sniff sniff:  you missed my post.. :( I was a good gal for once.. and didnt talk about Sex at all..  and I am even
(http://i12.photobucket.com/albums/a206/Angiex911dsptchr/nemo.gif)

 I love yah Lalas. I got behind  LOL


Title: Lively Case Discussion #561 12/16 - 12/18/2006
Post by: bleachedblack on December 17, 2006, 11:18:05 PM
Thank-you Klaasend and Tamikosmom for the links to the Dr.Phil transcripts, they were long and I have read through them quickly, sorry to say Florida I didn't find the MP/Mexico reference that I thought I had learned there. Harry-Tho has several references to MP, but as a source, I elected to leave that out. I will keep looking....there has been so much written on and reported, and I am very bad at keeping archives....unlike you Janet.  :wink:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #561 12/16 - 12/18/2006
Post by: crazybabyborg on December 17, 2006, 11:20:36 PM
Klaas..I saw your post!  :shock:

Where is that document now, and WHY the Hell hasn't KJ given it to the court?!  :evil:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #561 12/16 - 12/18/2006
Post by: Cat on December 17, 2006, 11:21:28 PM
i wanted to say hey.We are recoving here,so we are blessed.The real question I have is,aren't there more than 1 mob.A columbian cartel,a Chicago money based group and etc.I always thought that the k2's were involved in scams,money laudering and coordinting shipments by computer.I heard that aruba was a convient way station,to to transfer drugs from Europe,and South America,as well as money.I have noticed that joran does protest to much.Way to much,he always wants to point to others.A tired Cat


Title: Lively Case Discussion #561 12/16 - 12/18/2006
Post by: bleachedblack on December 17, 2006, 11:22:30 PM
Actually this is a pretty good piece.......couldn't resist...

++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++

September 22, 2005
HarryTho On The Natalee Holloway Case: Was Michael Posner in the mob?
Topics: Natalee Holloway

A reader at another site asked if the Mike Posner of Aruba is the same Mike Posner from the Chicago Mob. The answer is yes. He did some time in the 80s, but after his release the Chicago outfit rewarded him by putting him in charge of their Aruba interests. In Chicago he was identified in the newspapers as “The Vice Kingpin of the Northwest Suburbs.” He ran gambling, adult bookstores, strip clubs and prostitution. You'll recall that Posner and Natalee went missing during the same week, which is too much of a coincidence to simply ignore. According to the early posts on Dan Reihl's site, Posner met Natalee at the Excelsior Casino. I believe it was at the same time that Natalee introduced herself to Joran van der Sloot.

Posner certainly had the ability to make Natalee disappear. From the comments on the excelsior Casino that they cater to a lot of wealthy South Americans, I would suspect that Posner would be our connection to the sex trade. He is the King of the Bums in Aruba. He knows what is going on criminal-wise. The fact that Natalee has not appeared, tells me that he had something to do with her disappearance.

I have suspected Posner's involvement all along, but I had never previously suspected that he had a criminal record from Chicago, at least until the information came out. How the Aruba police have not clamped down on this guy is simply amazing. But, Posner could have had an arrangement with the former Police Chief van der Straaten.

As reported: Michael Posner owns the Excelsior Casino in Aruba, and caters mostly to "Spaniards". From what I gather from the Excelsior's casino info, some 30% of the gamblers come from South America. These are experienced gamblers used to playing for high stakes. Hence, they are South Americans with money!

On another note, the Excelsior Casino is a pioneer in on-line gambling.

Also, Michal Posner bought the Grand Holiday Casino (GHC) and changed the name to the Excelsior Casino on 1 September 1998.

Posted for HarryTho

http://www.hyscience.com/archives/2005/09/harrytho_on_the.php


Title: Lively Case Discussion #561 12/16 - 12/18/2006
Post by: crazybabyborg on December 17, 2006, 11:22:42 PM
Betcha that document is part of the reason that JQK filed a wrongful DEATH suit, instead of something else for Deepak.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #561 12/16 - 12/18/2006
Post by: klaasend on December 17, 2006, 11:23:22 PM
This is the design I used for the small poster that's in Cafepress.  I added Hammer's picture CBB created to this one that I'll post to start the next LCD thread. Kindof late now to change the picture in Caferess.:

(http://i37.photobucket.com/albums/e82/klaasend2/smtreeFinal2holidayPoster3small.jpg)


Title: Lively Case Discussion #561 12/16 - 12/18/2006
Post by: bleachedblack on December 17, 2006, 11:23:34 PM
Quote from: "Cat"
i wanted to say hey.We are recoving here,so we are blessed.The real question I have is,aren't there more than 1 mob.A columbian cartel,a Chicago money based group and etc.I always thought that the k2's were involved in scams,money laudering and coordinting shipments by computer.I heard that aruba was a convient way station,to to transfer drugs from Europe,and South America,as well as money.I have noticed that joran does protest to much.Way to much,he always wants to point to others.A tired Cat


IMO they are not that big a pair of fish........


Title: Lively Case Discussion #561 12/16 - 12/18/2006
Post by: justinsmama on December 17, 2006, 11:24:22 PM
Quote from: "mishy"
Quote from: "justinsmama"
Quote from: "Carnut"
Quote from: "justinsmama"
Have you ever tried to do therapy with someone who is not too terribly close to the norm on intelligence? It is extremely difficult, if not damn near impossible to do. At least, not the usual "talk", insight oriented therapy or even cognitive behavioral therapy. Generally, such folks instead benefit most from a very directive (though kind) approach. It is with those clients only that I actually tell them what to do. And even at that, my "directions" are very small, one to two step behaviors that I instruct the client to perform.


Hummm, are you saying that substance abusers tend toward not being too terribly close to the norm on intelligence?


LMAO! If that were the case, I would not have the level of education and highly developed talents that I do!


LOL Justinsmama!! I was waiting for you to say that...I was about to add, "NO, just the opposite, actually, Carnut..."
 8)  8)  8)  8)  8)  8)  8)


Mish~ Or if not too terribly close to the intelligence norm, then on the other side of that bell curve!


Title: Lively Case Discussion #561 12/16 - 12/18/2006
Post by: justinsmama on December 17, 2006, 11:25:48 PM
Klaas~ That tree would make a fabulous Christmas card!


Title: Lively Case Discussion #561 12/16 - 12/18/2006
Post by: the big hammer on December 17, 2006, 11:25:53 PM
Closed Hearings, Closed Rooms, Closed to the "Public"

Klaas writes: See my quote above from the Dr. Phil show?

*********************************************

INGMAR: ...So--so he was, like, telling that he knows that Deepak did it. He says that he can point to place where he--Deepak Kalpoe buried the body. So actually--and so this was signed by all--all four policemen.

McGRAW: And this is signed by four police officers.

Mr. SKEETERS: And given to the prosecutor on the--for the--the justice system, and not given to the court.


**********************************************

And this one was inadmissable because...........?????

The goon failed to sign?

Sure sounds like he's accusing Deepak of murder (sotaspeak).

.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #561 12/16 - 12/18/2006
Post by: klaasend on December 17, 2006, 11:28:23 PM
Quote from: "the big hammer"
Closed Hearings, Closed Rooms, Closed to the "Public"

Klaas writes: See my quote above from the Dr. Phil show?

*********************************************

INGMAR: ...So--so he was, like, telling that he knows that Deepak did it. He says that he can point to place where he--Deepak Kalpoe buried the body. So actually--and so this was signed by all--all four policemen.

McGRAW: And this is signed by four police officers.

Mr. SKEETERS: And given to the prosecutor on the--for the--the justice system, and not given to the court.


**********************************************

And this one was inadmissable because...........?????

The goon failed to sign?

Sure sounds like he's accusing Deepak of murder (sotaspeak).

.

What about all the video taping they were supposed to be doing of interrogations?  I suppose the video camera wasn't working that day, huh?


Title: Lively Case Discussion #561 12/16 - 12/18/2006
Post by: the big hammer on December 17, 2006, 11:30:27 PM
SM Christmas Tree --

Klaas, thanks.  No problem re: cafe express print deadline.  I completely understand.

Thanks for including me on the list, and thanks to CBB for giving me a Christmas "coating".

The tree looks terrific.

.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #561 12/16 - 12/18/2006
Post by: klaasend on December 17, 2006, 11:31:45 PM
You're very welcome Hammer.  You are on the SCROLL for the ones already in Cafepress.  :wink:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #561 12/16 - 12/18/2006
Post by: klaasend on December 17, 2006, 11:34:18 PM
HAMMER - maybe you can answer a question for me.  In the USA, if a suspect is questioned but refuses to sign the statement, can it still be used as evidence?  I think it can.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #561 12/16 - 12/18/2006
Post by: the big hammer on December 17, 2006, 11:39:50 PM
Devastating Leaks

Klaas writes: What about all the video taping they were supposed to be doing of interrogations? I suppose the video camera wasn't working that day, huh?

Indeed.

In their context, intent and chronology, many of these statements were never supposed to be seen by the public.  The closed Dutch Aruban system would've taken care of that.

That these statements, and the many other statements, are now open to public scrutiny is really a disaster for Aruba and the prosecutor.  These statements make them look incompetent or worse.

Whoever leaked these "official statements" knows what happened, I'd wager.

.
[/i]


Title: Lively Case Discussion #561 12/16 - 12/18/2006
Post by: LilPuma on December 17, 2006, 11:40:11 PM
Quote from: "Cat"
i wanted to say hey.We are recoving here,so we are blessed.The real question I have is,aren't there more than 1 mob.A columbian cartel,a Chicago money based group and etc.I always thought that the k2's were involved in scams,money laudering and coordinting shipments by computer.I heard that aruba was a convient way station,to to transfer drugs from Europe,and South America,as well as money.I have noticed that joran does protest to much.Way to much,he always wants to point to others.A tired Cat


I think a good part of the Carribean is used for drug smuggling and money laundering.  We've all wondered where Joran gets his gambling and drinking money.  Wouldn't surprise me if these guys were involved in something illegal.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #561 12/16 - 12/18/2006
Post by: crazybabyborg on December 17, 2006, 11:40:58 PM
You're welcome, Hammer. Merry Christmas!

If 4 people witnessed Joran say that, it's not hearsay and I would think that it could come in through their testimony.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #561 12/16 - 12/18/2006
Post by: crazybabyborg on December 17, 2006, 11:42:10 PM
Remember the documents Beth got out of Aruba? Wonder if that was one of them.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #561 12/16 - 12/18/2006
Post by: bleachedblack on December 17, 2006, 11:43:09 PM
The transcript from the November Dr Phil show is very disturbing in parts, and serves to remind me when I read it that the people behind the scenes in Venezuela, Mexico or Aruba are truely dangerous killers without bounds. This is an excerpt spoken by Ty Ritter, PI hired by Dr Phil.......

"We were trying to recover children that were being filmed, and I found this girl.They had tied her to a bed. They had driven a large nail through the top of her head. When the nail is in the brain,it causes the body to convulse. As she's convulsing they are having sex and filming until she dies. On her bottom, she had a tatoo of a ram's head in a circle. That's a tatoo they use for branding children. The expert told us the tatoo was at least 10 years old.
She was approximately 18.19 years old. So this girl ended up in sexual slavery at a very young age."


Title: Lively Case Discussion #561 12/16 - 12/18/2006
Post by: LilPuma on December 18, 2006, 12:00:05 AM
Bleachedblack, I won't copy your post about sex slavery, but this is the one instance where I would encourage "suicide by cop" being arranged by the cops.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #561 12/16 - 12/18/2006
Post by: LilPuma on December 18, 2006, 12:01:30 AM
Quote from: "crazybabyborg"
You're welcome, Hammer. Merry Christmas!

If 4 people witnessed Joran say that, it's not hearsay and I would think that it could come in through their testimony.


I don't think the hearsay rules apply to signed statements by detectives who are present during interrogations.   :?


Title: Lively Case Discussion #561 12/16 - 12/18/2006
Post by: sb on December 18, 2006, 12:17:04 AM
bleachedblack's post reminds me of  a striking statement that I heard early on in the case.

Someone claimed that the idea of a "snuff film" was a figment of the imagination. That nothing like that ever took place. That there was NO DOCUMENTED INSTANCE of it ever happening.

Well, here is the proof. People DO film the death of others in a sexually explicit context. That post is proof of that. I knew that claim was bogus- I mean, what was Daniel Pearl's death, anyway? People filmed his murder and sent the film to the authorities here in the US. What's the difference, except that he was not sexually assaulted?

Therer is no doubt at all that there IS such a thing as a "snuff film" and that they are bigger business than we can know.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #561 12/16 - 12/18/2006
Post by: klaasend on December 18, 2006, 12:19:37 AM
Quote from: "sb"
bleachedblack's post reminds me of  a striking statement that I heard early on in the case.

Someone claimed that the idea of a "snuff film" was a figment of the imagination. That nothing like that ever took place. That there was NO DOCUMENTED INSTANCE of it ever happening.

Well, here is the proof. People DO film the death of others in a sexually explicit context. That post is proof of that. I knew that claim was bogus- I mean, what was Daniel Pearl's death, anyway? People filmed his murder and sent the film to the authorities here in the US. What's the difference, except that he was not sexually assaulted?

Therer is no doubt at all that there IS such a thing as a "snuff film" and that they are bigger business than we can know.


SB - I agree


Title: Satin Sheet
Post by: IBE on December 18, 2006, 12:20:36 AM
satin sheet+satin pjs= opps we'd he go ie: slipping off the bed

Not that I have ever had that experience :roll:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #561 12/16 - 12/18/2006
Post by: sb on December 18, 2006, 12:23:23 AM
TRYING to keep us on topic and preventing the slide into pillow talk...  :wink:

Not succeeding too well, evidently.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #561 12/16 - 12/18/2006
Post by: klaasend on December 18, 2006, 12:25:43 AM
Tomorrow, Dr. Phil will have Beth on his show and an update.  I'm hoping he'll address the Kalpoe suit.

I have a feeling this will be in interresting week.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #561 12/16 - 12/18/2006
Post by: IBE on December 18, 2006, 12:31:03 AM
Seriously

I hope also that this week helps bring Justice for Natalee.
What time is Dr Phil on and what network?

Thanks

IBE


Title: Lively Case Discussion #561 12/16 - 12/18/2006
Post by: klaasend on December 18, 2006, 12:34:43 AM
Quote from: "IBE"
Seriously

I hope also that this week helps bring Justice for Natalee.
What time is Dr Phil on and what network?

Thanks

IBE

It's on at 4pm, on CBS in my area.  Not sure about yours.  Here's a link to the showtimes:

http://www.drphil.com/shows/listing/?localListing=CA&formAction=save


Title: Lively Case Discussion #561 12/16 - 12/18/2006
Post by: sb on December 18, 2006, 12:35:11 AM
OK, now that I have shifted the discussion away from bedsheets, I am going to go use some. They won't be flannel and they won't be satin, but they WILL accomplish their desired purpose.  LOL!

Seroiusly, I am headed out!  Y'all have a good night.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #561 12/16 - 12/18/2006
Post by: klaasend on December 18, 2006, 12:36:02 AM
Quote from: "sb"
OK, now that I have shifted the discussion away from bedsheets, I am going to go use some. They won't be flannel and they won't be satin, but they WILL accomplish their desired purpose.  LOL!

Seroiusly, I am headed out!  Y'all have a good night.

Nite SB!


Title: Lively Case Discussion #561 12/16 - 12/18/2006
Post by: bleachedblack on December 18, 2006, 12:36:26 AM
Quote from: "sb"
bleachedblack's post reminds me of  a striking statement that I heard early on in the case.

Someone claimed that the idea of a "snuff film" was a figment of the imagination. That nothing like that ever took place. That there was NO DOCUMENTED INSTANCE of it ever happening.

Well, here is the proof. People DO film the death of others in a sexually explicit context. That post is proof of that. I knew that claim was bogus- I mean, what was Daniel Pearl's death, anyway? People filmed his murder and sent the film to the authorities here in the US. What's the difference, except that he was not sexually assaulted?

Therer is no doubt at all that there IS such a thing as a "snuff film" and that they are bigger business than we can know.


sb what you state is sadly true. Again, this is not documented, but the general manager of Carlos and Charlies is one that is reportedly related to someone(brother) that has a connection to making snuff films. These type films are also known to be made in other parts of the world ie Africa. How I wish all children could lead happy lives, without knowing pain or sadness....with loving parents, food, medicine.....never knowing war.....just able to play and go to school.  :cry:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #561 12/16 - 12/18/2006
Post by: bleachedblack on December 18, 2006, 12:37:57 AM
Quote from: "klaasend"
Tomorrow, Dr. Phil will have Beth on his show and an update.  I'm hoping he'll address the Kalpoe suit.

I have a feeling this will be in interresting week.


Thank-you for the reminder Klaas.......goodnight all.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #561 12/16 - 12/18/2006
Post by: klaasend on December 18, 2006, 12:39:21 AM
Nite BB


Title: Lively Case Discussion #561 12/16 - 12/18/2006
Post by: Altruist on December 18, 2006, 12:46:48 AM
DK admits on the Skeeters tape that he is looking to sue the USA networks, admits that his reputation is over, he believes that his resident alien status on the Devil's Rock will not be approved in the future, he states that he is $50,000 in debt to attorney's, that he wants to tell Beth that he now sees a different side of her, bitchy, but I believe that he did tell Beth that & her response was "I've been saving that for you Deepak", but to JS, he claims he wanted to state it not that he did.  He is a liar thinking he's going to get rich & after reading the following it makes me again revisit that this was planned all along & the motivation was celebrity & $$$$$$$$$$'s.

Jamie Skeeters: You will make money on a book, they make a movie. This will make one hell of a movie. And, they don't need anybody's permission. The first one there is going to get the book... the book rights, the movie rights.. And its uh.. I'm sure, the Twitty's have an offer.

Deepak Kalpoe:  Yeah?
Jamie Skeeters:  I'm sure they have. (unintelligible) I don't think except that she still wants  (unintelligible) ? she is running it (unintelligible) through him right now. I've been trying to read her mind. You can't polygraph her. She.. (unintelligible). Let me try to get her opinion on something.

Deepak Kalpoe:  And if they find Natalee alive today, what happens to us? All the attention goes to her. Except, we're over.Jamie Skeeters:   That's right (unintelligible)

Deepak Kalpoe:  We're over, everything that's happened to usJamie Skeeters:  That's right, you got you're right (laughs)
Deepak Kalpoe:  Either way... either way, no one cares for us. If you look at it that way.   I mean
Jamie Skeeters:   You're right, except one exception.
Deepak Kalpoe:  If Natalee comes alive tomorrow, what is everyone going to do, including    the media? They're gonna..Jamie Skeeters:  Oh, we were wrong about those boys..those cronies (unintelligible)
Deepak Kalpoe:  ...and they are gonna go home and all the attention will be on her and where we stand?
Jamie Skeeters:  And she'll make a movie…..
Deepak Kalpoe:  And where we stand?
Jamie Skeeters:  "Hey, we're sorry, you're... yeah... we all believed you, we always believed you." 'Cause only one person I know of who's backing you up in the professional world? That's Phil. It's unbelievable... (unintelligible)

Deepak Kalpoe:  That's uh, a guy from Fox came to talk to me Friday and (unintelligible) asked him that question "What happens, if she comes alive today... right now... she walks in here? What's going to happen?" And, he said uh " (unintelligible)" That's it. That's what I want to know.

See what I mean like in his head he is justifying her being done away with in order to make sure they are the center's of attention, publicity, victim status & all important book & movie revenues.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #561 12/16 - 12/18/2006
Post by: Hotshot on December 18, 2006, 01:20:23 AM
I am going to bed now, but you can listen to those good parts of the skeeters/deepak tapes here
http://arubassilence.bravehost.com/Skeeter.html


Title: Lively Case Discussion #561 12/16 - 12/18/2006
Post by: LouiseVargas on December 18, 2006, 01:23:06 AM
SB,

I presented the idea of a snuff film and it was shot down. Monkeys said the Daniel Pearl film was snuff but I don't agree. Snuff films refer directly to sex. Don't ask me how I know. That is their value. They are rare and I would assume they are very expensive.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #561 12/16 - 12/18/2006
Post by: the big hammer on December 18, 2006, 02:08:36 AM
Exactly What Was The Script --

Louise Vargas writes: I presented the idea of a snuff film and it was shot down...

Not here.

I think it was Dutchlady who first said so in June of 2005.

But that's a long time ago.

I feel quite content that pain is being inflicted where it belongs, especially considering the current news of dueling lawsuits, and these mysterious tidings for year end.  

A lump of coal in the sloot stockings for Christmas.

And that is as it should be.

It was always about the movie.  If the script were available, the crime would be solved, IMO.

.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #561 12/16 - 12/18/2006
Post by: LouiseVargas on December 18, 2006, 02:25:16 AM
Hey, big hammer,

I DID post my thoughts here. You must have missed it. Have you been here EVERY single day since May 2005 like I have? I don't know anything about what Dutchlady posted.

It's always been my theory that they kidnapped her and made a snuff film.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #561 12/16 - 12/18/2006
Post by: nonesuche on December 18, 2006, 02:38:20 AM
Quote from: "klaasend"
Quote from: "IBE"
Seriously

I hope also that this week helps bring Justice for Natalee.
What time is Dr Phil on and what network?

Thanks

IBE

It's on at 4pm, on CBS in my area.  Not sure about yours.  Here's a link to the showtimes:

http://www.drphil.com/shows/listing/?localListing=CA&formAction=save


It's on at 9am here, I'll be out sending the last shipments of cookies but will TiVo it and post a review as soon as I can, but I bet San will beat me to it  :lol:

Hammer, hopefully these suspects will have an encounter with a form of Scrooge over the holiday, it would be fitting except I think they and their parents have a total lack of morality or conscience.

Night All !


Title: Lively Case Discussion #561 12/16 - 12/18/2006
Post by: crazybabyborg on December 18, 2006, 03:40:16 AM
I've been watching continued coverage of the Mt. Hood climbers.
I hope none of us will ever find ourselves in a situation where we will be faced with survival in the elements, but I wanted to post this. It's instructions with pictures of how to build a snow cave. I have the feeling that even if such a thing wasn't needed for years to come, we might remember it if push came to shove.

http://tinyurl.com/y37ybd


Title: Lively Case Discussion #561 12/16 - 12/18/2006
Post by: Carnut on December 18, 2006, 03:56:38 AM
Quote from: "crazybabyborg"
I've been watching continued coverage of the Mt. Hood climbers.
I hope none of us will ever find ourselves in a situation where we will be faced with survival in the elements, but I wanted to post this. It's instructions with pictures of how to build a snow cave. I have the feeling that even if such a thing wasn't needed for years to come, we might remember it if push came to shove.

http://tinyurl.com/y37ybd


I would think anyone who intends to live on this planet ought to know abit about surviving on it.

I guess it's another case of proving the theory of survival of the fittest, especially in putting oneself in conditions out of the norm.

Sometimes mother nature wins no matter how prepared you are.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #561 12/16 - 12/18/2006
Post by: Peaches on December 18, 2006, 07:10:37 AM
Quote from: "San"
Quote from: "klaasend"
Quote from: "San"
Quote from: "klaasend"
In about an hour, I'm leaving for our extended family Christmas get together.  I'll be gone about 6 hours or so.  Tom will be in charge, so take it easy on him, ok  :lol:

Have a good time Klaas.


Honestly, I'll want to come home after about 3 hours but that's not likely to happen, lol  :lol:

Last time I went to a family get together with the crazy side of my family a big fight broke out.  I was like :shock: .  Then I took a look and guess whose older sister got challenged to a fight :lol: .  I had to grab her with another person to get her out of there because she went after the woman (she never backs down).  I said we better go home before we get killed.  It's been two years and I've never been to another family function and don't plan on attending again :lol: .  I was like a scene out of a movie you would not believe it.


Holy crap!  No wonder you pack heat!
Good morning.  I have to go to the oral surgeon this morning.  This cyst around my wisdom tooth is killing me.  I'm sure my office thinks I plan all my crises around the holidays.  Last year I had surgery Dec. 27.  This year I have chemo Dec. 27.  If they only knew...  So I'm reading to catch up until I have to go....


Title: Lively Case Discussion #561 12/16 - 12/18/2006
Post by: tcumom on December 18, 2006, 07:28:38 AM
Peaches ~ Hopefully, the minute the cyst is *taken care of*, your pain will diminish.  Glad your next chemo is after the big day ~ take care, and I always anxiously await your postings after you've had a treatment ~ want to hear that you're okay!


Title: Lively Case Discussion #561 12/16 - 12/18/2006
Post by: justinsmama on December 18, 2006, 07:48:53 AM
Quote from: "tcumom"
Peaches ~ Hopefully, the minute the cyst is *taken care of*, your pain will diminish.  Glad your next chemo is after the big day ~ take care, and I always anxiously await your postings after you've had a treatment ~ want to hear that you're okay!


Yeah, what she said!


Title: Lively Case Discussion #561 12/16 - 12/18/2006
Post by: Frijole on December 18, 2006, 08:16:31 AM
Quote from: "Peaches"

Good morning.  I have to go to the oral surgeon this morning.  This cyst around my wisdom tooth is killing me.  I'm sure my office thinks I plan all my crises around the holidays.  Last year I had surgery Dec. 27.  This year I have chemo Dec. 27.  If they only knew...  So I'm reading to catch up until I have to go....


Heh Peaches!  Shouting out a Seasons Greetings and sending a hug your way.  FYI, Husker lady volleyball team won the NCAA championship this weekend!  My 2 yr old nephew said, "Go Huckers"!  LOL  Hang in there my friend.


Title: Good Morning, Good Morning
Post by: Leslie on December 18, 2006, 08:27:07 AM
Diario
http://www.diarioaruba.com/
Amigoe
http://www.amigoe.com/english/
BonDia
http://www.cspnv.com/
Solo di Pueblo
http://www.solodipueblo.com/
AweMainta
http://www.awemainta.com/
Aruba Today
http://www.arubatoday.com/
Translator:
http://papiamentu.donamaro.nl


Title: Lively Case Discussion #561 12/16 - 12/18/2006
Post by: LilPuma on December 18, 2006, 08:57:55 AM
Quote from: "Carnut"
Quote from: "crazybabyborg"
I've been watching continued coverage of the Mt. Hood climbers.
I hope none of us will ever find ourselves in a situation where we will be faced with survival in the elements, but I wanted to post this. It's instructions with pictures of how to build a snow cave. I have the feeling that even if such a thing wasn't needed for years to come, we might remember it if push came to shove.

http://tinyurl.com/y37ybd


I would think anyone who intends to live on this planet ought to know abit about surviving on it.

I guess it's another case of proving the theory of survival of the fittest, especially in putting oneself in conditions out of the norm.

Sometimes mother nature wins no matter how prepared you are.


If you get Discovery Channel, check your listings for a show called Survivor Man or Man v. Wild.  These are guys who do know how to survive in the elements.  They drop them off in various places and they have to survive while trying to get to civilization - a road, a house, something.  Seems there's a camera person on one of these shows, none on the other IIRC, but they don't help these guys.  They do tell you lots of stuff you need to know.  They have a certain amount of time to find their way out before the rescue crew comes in to help them.  The shows are repeated pretty frequently.


Title: Re: Satin Sheet
Post by: LilPuma on December 18, 2006, 09:00:56 AM
Quote from: "IBE"
satin sheet+satin pjs= opps we'd he go ie: slipping off the bed

Not that I have ever had that experience :roll:


  :shock:  :shock: :lol:  :lol:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #561 12/16 - 12/18/2006
Post by: LilPuma on December 18, 2006, 09:14:45 AM
Quote from: "Altruist"
DK admits on the Skeeters tape that he is looking to sue the USA networks, admits that his reputation is over, he believes that his resident alien status on the Devil's Rock will not be approved in the future, he states that he is $50,000 in debt to attorney's, that he wants to tell Beth that he now sees a different side of her, bitchy, but I believe that he did tell Beth that & her response was "I've been saving that for you Deepak", but to JS, he claims he wanted to state it not that he did.  He is a liar thinking he's going to get rich & after reading the following it makes me again revisit that this was planned all along & the motivation was celebrity & $$$$$$$$$$'s.

(Edited for time.  The statements of Altruist have not been altered or misrepresented in the editing process. :D )

See what I mean like in his head he is justifying her being done away with in order to make sure they are the center's of attention, publicity, victim status & all important book & movie revenues.


You're so right.  The Skeeters tape shows he doesn't care about Natalee being alive or not, he wants money for what's happened to him.  He doesn't say "Man, I hope they find her, I hope she's alive.  All this will go away.  She can go back to her family, live her life, and so can we."  All about him getting some money out of this.  He says his life is ruined (before Dr. Phil airs) and 18 months later, he's still a suspect and what actually happened that night is still unknown because Joran's 2006 TV blitz still had inconsistencies AND his mother and US attorney still tell a different story than Joran while talking about Joran and that night.  :roll:  Skeeters is clearly playing to this mindset.  On the other hand, if Deepak had taken a polygraph and passed on many key points, Dr. Phil would have aired it and ALE could not have ignored it to make Joran look less guilty.  I don't think this tape is going to make a jury sympathetic to Deepak and I don't see how they can suppress any portions of it since the tape is the subject of the suit.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #561 12/16 - 12/18/2006
Post by: LilPuma on December 18, 2006, 09:19:02 AM
Quote from: "tcumom"
Peaches ~ Hopefully, the minute the cyst is *taken care of*, your pain will diminish.  Glad your next chemo is after the big day ~ take care, and I always anxiously await your postings after you've had a treatment ~ want to hear that you're okay!


If we know when Peaches is going for her chemo, could we remind everyone that day and a day or so after to keep sending prayers and healing, feel good thoughts her way throughout the day, especially on those days?


Title: Lively Case Discussion #561 12/16 - 12/18/2006
Post by: klaasend on December 18, 2006, 09:22:29 AM
Quote from: "LouiseVargas"
Hey, big hammer,

I DID post my thoughts here. You must have missed it. Have you been here EVERY single day since May 2005 like I have? I don't know anything about what Dutchlady posted.

It's always been my theory that they kidnapped her and made a snuff film.


I'm not awake yet but I wanted to address this before I forgot.

Hammer was agreeing with you.  When Hammer said "not here" he meant he did not shoot down your theory of the snuff film.

Just wanted you to understand that.  :wink:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #561 12/16 - 12/18/2006
Post by: LilPuma on December 18, 2006, 09:23:04 AM
Ok, I'll shut up and go eat some breakfast while you all have your coffee.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #561 12/16 - 12/18/2006
Post by: klaasend on December 18, 2006, 09:41:49 AM
From the Dr. Phil website about todays show:

Natalee Holloway's disappearance made worldwide headlines and Dr. Phil has been working diligently with the missing teen’s brave mother, Beth Twitty, to try and find answers. Catch up on this story here, here and here.

Dr. Phil sits down with Beth again to talk about some very interesting developments in this story.

Beth explains what she’s been doing lately. “I’ve really been involved with a foundation that I’ve established, it’s the International Safe Travels Foundation, so I’ve been really busy with messages to high school and college students and Auburn University right now is working in conjunction with the foundation in developing a curriculum. They’re just delving into the legal and safety issues for the person who’s traveling internationally. The third thing that’s come about is the lawsuit that’s been filed,” she says.

Dr. Phil elaborates, “We’ve played footage of an interview with the older Kalpoe brother, Deepak, as it was gathered by Jamie Skeeters, and they’re now contesting what was said and have sued this show and made allegations against me and you about tampering with the tape. How do you feel about the fact that they’ve sued the show over that broadcast that you and I did that day?”

“The reason why they’re doing it is because there have been no repercussions,” Beth says. “They’ve never had to be accountable or responsible for any actions they’ve taken. No matter what they do, no matter how many lies that they generate, they just feel as if there’s nothing that’s going to happen to them.”

“Well, let’s look at the upside of our being sued by these suspects in the case. That has established a jurisdictional right for you to file a lawsuit against them for what?” Dr. Phil asks.

“With a wrongful death suit, it will allow the attorneys to pose these suspects and see if we can get to the inconsistencies in all of the statements,” Beth explains. “And that’s what we’ve asked for all along. We’ve just wanted somebody to hold their feet to the fire and get to the bottom of what happened, besides this litany of lies that they’ve just continued to generate.”

“When you step back and take the broad view of the fact that we took up Natalee’s cause when everybody was thinking this is old and cold, and we got sued for our troubles, how do you feel about that?” Dr. Phil asks.

“Oh, gosh, Dr. Phil, it just makes me sick. All you’ve tried to do from the beginning is just get to the bottom of it, get the answer,” she says.

“We stand by the integrity of that taped interview that was played on the show, and we stand by you continuing this investigation to find out what has happened to Natalee.”

Beth is grateful. “It is certainly not a talk show. It has just been action from you. Everything that you’ve done has just been the right step at the right time. And what I needed was what you provided, and that’s what keeps a path moving toward justice and toward answers,” she says.

“It is frustrating, but here’s what we know for sure: We know Natalee disappeared and is still missing. We know that you have an unfettered right to discuss it and talk about it, and we’re going to continue to talk about it and investigate it until we get answers and the guilty people are held accountable. And we’re not going to be intimidated by some ridiculous lawsuit,” Dr. Phil says.

“And I want you Dr. Phil, and John Kelly, and the team that you have, that’s who I want to find the answers because the Aruban government is not going to do anything,” Beth says.

“Well, you’ve got a great lawyer in John Kelly, so I know we’re all going to stay the course. And I’m sorry that we’re having to do it, but Natalee deserves nothing less,” Dr. Phil tells her.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #561 12/16 - 12/18/2006
Post by: Lala'sMom on December 18, 2006, 10:09:06 AM
Good morning monkeys.  Coffee anyone?


Title: Lively Case Discussion #561 12/16 - 12/18/2006
Post by: the big hammer on December 18, 2006, 10:11:55 AM
Agreed (that I agreed...)

Klaas writes: Hammer was agreeing with you. When Hammer said "not here" he meant he did not shoot down your theory of the snuff film.

Yes, that's what I meant.  

Still alot of open questions and actual cause of death are unknown.  As I posted above, however, if one knew the script/storyline of the "movie," then alot of progress could be made.

IMO.

.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #561 12/16 - 12/18/2006
Post by: klaasend on December 18, 2006, 10:15:11 AM
Quote from: "the big hammer"
Agreed (that I agreed...)

Klaas writes: Hammer was agreeing with you. When Hammer said "not here" he meant he did not shoot down your theory of the snuff film.

Yes, that's what I meant.  

Still alot of open questions and actual cause of death are unknown.  As I posted above, however, if one knew the script/storyline of the "movie," then alot of progress could be made.

IMO.

.

Hammer - I still believe that film was broadcast via the internet or cell phone that night.  It's out there somewhere, I just know it.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #561 12/16 - 12/18/2006
Post by: robots on December 18, 2006, 10:24:19 AM
Quote from: "klaasend"
Quote from: "the big hammer"
Agreed (that I agreed...)

Klaas writes: Hammer was agreeing with you. When Hammer said "not here" he meant he did not shoot down your theory of the snuff film.

Yes, that's what I meant.  

Still alot of open questions and actual cause of death are unknown.  As I posted above, however, if one knew the script/storyline of the "movie," then alot of progress could be made.

IMO.

.

Hammer - I still believe that film was broadcast via the internet or cell phone that night.  It's out there somewhere, I just know it.




YEP,


Title: Lively Case Discussion #561 12/16 - 12/18/2006
Post by: robots on December 18, 2006, 10:25:20 AM
i agree  8)


Title: Lively Case Discussion #561 12/16 - 12/18/2006
Post by: Cat on December 18, 2006, 10:32:38 AM
I have a nightmare about this event.What started as a ritual rape evolved into a snuff film,because Natalee fought bach and hurt jvds.She may have been badly injured and given to someone else for a seperate film.I know snuff films exist,just as demons do in human form.I will be happy to write about surviving the outdoors,I used to teach it.Cat


Title: Lively Case Discussion #561 12/16 - 12/18/2006
Post by: crazybabyborg on December 18, 2006, 10:33:30 AM
Dr. Phil elaborates, “We’ve played footage of an interview with the older Kalpoe brother, Deepak, as it was gathered by Jamie Skeeters, and they’re now contesting what was said and have sued this show and made allegations against me and you about tampering with the tape. How do you feel about the fact that they’ve sued the show over that broadcast that you and I did that day?”

Oh, oh, oh!!!! I'm not even through reading it, and I'm jumping with joy!!!!! I love the man, I love the producers!!!
He's establishing the connection, he's helping Beth to get the deposition and answers. He's trying to help with the argument!

(http://i25.photobucket.com/albums/c100/crazybabyborgs/woohoo20dance.gif)


Title: Lively Case Discussion #561 12/16 - 12/18/2006
Post by: crazybabyborg on December 18, 2006, 10:39:38 AM
Beth SHOULD have been named in that suit. The papers talk about the tape and her comments working to "defame" DK's reputation. Slander is part of the filing, and to prove slander you MUST prove it was FALSE information that you were the source of. That would take Beth right where she wants to be; to ALL those questions she wants answered.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #561 12/16 - 12/18/2006
Post by: IndyDan on December 18, 2006, 10:42:08 AM
Quote from: "crazybabyborg"
(http://i25.photobucket.com/albums/c100/crazybabyborgs/IndyDan-1.gif)

HEY!! Is Klaas good or what!

ahh, this is great, my own Christmas avatar.  Thanks, it's a real pleasure to be in the company of such talent. :o


Title: Lively Case Discussion #561 12/16 - 12/18/2006
Post by: MsVada on December 18, 2006, 10:42:51 AM
Quote from: "Lala'sMom"
Good morning monkeys.  Coffee anyone?



mornin' lala's

actually, with the mornin; I've had,  I'm ready for a stiff drink! :shock:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #561 12/16 - 12/18/2006
Post by: robots on December 18, 2006, 10:43:13 AM
Quote from: "Ms.DarthVada"
Quote from: "Lala'sMom"
Good morning monkeys.  Coffee anyone?



mornin' lala's

actually, with the mornin; I've had,  I'm ready for a stiff drink! :shock:



 :shock:  :lol:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #561 12/16 - 12/18/2006
Post by: Ono on December 18, 2006, 10:45:03 AM
Quote from: "crazybabyborg"
Dr. Phil elaborates, “We’ve played footage of an interview with the older Kalpoe brother, Deepak, as it was gathered by Jamie Skeeters, and they’re now contesting what was said and have sued this show and made allegations against me and you about tampering with the tape. How do you feel about the fact that they’ve sued the show over that broadcast that you and I did that day?”

Oh, oh, oh!!!! I'm not even through reading it, and I'm jumping with joy!!!!! I love the man, I love the producers!!!
He's establishing the connection, he's helping Beth to get the deposition and answers. He's trying to help with the argument!

(http://i25.photobucket.com/albums/c100/crazybabyborgs/woohoo20dance.gif)


It's truly fabulous. :D  He is kindness personified.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #561 12/16 - 12/18/2006
Post by: IndyDan on December 18, 2006, 10:45:06 AM
Quote from: "klaasend"
Quote from: "IBE"
Seriously

I hope also that this week helps bring Justice for Natalee.
What time is Dr Phil on and what network?

Thanks

IBE

It's on at 4pm, on CBS in my area.  Not sure about yours.  Here's a link to the showtimes:

http://www.drphil.com/shows/listing/?localListing=CA&formAction=save


It comes on at 3 here in Indy.  I think I'll pack up the laptop, grab a pizza and finish working the afternoon from home.  Don't want to miss anything the Doc has to say about the suit.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #561 12/16 - 12/18/2006
Post by: crazybabyborg on December 18, 2006, 10:46:59 AM
Quote from: "IndyDan"
Quote from: "crazybabyborg"
(http://i25.photobucket.com/albums/c100/crazybabyborgs/IndyDan-1.gif)

HEY!! Is Klaas good or what!

ahh, this is great, my own Christmas avatar.  Thanks, it's a real pleasure to be in the company of such talent. :o


Well, thanks Indy! I enjoyed watching you in your Christmas gear for quite a while without having a clue how to get it out of photoshop, so anybody but me could even see it! You had a private audience!  :lol:

Once again, Klaas came to the rescue. That one was a joint effort!  :wink:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #561 12/16 - 12/18/2006
Post by: Tylergal on December 18, 2006, 10:47:11 AM
Quote from: "LouiseVargas"
SB,

I presented the idea of a snuff film and it was shot down. Monkeys said the Daniel Pearl film was snuff but I don't agree. Snuff films refer directly to sex. Don't ask me how I know. That is their value. They are rare and I would assume they are very expensive.


Our e-mailer person who quit e-mailing about August last year and who e-mailed from a different e-mail address each day from Aruba, told DH very early (via e-mail, of course) it was a snuff video.  I am not sure why said person quit writing, if person was scared off, if person was terminated, or what but there was no way we could respond to e-mails.  They would be returned  each time, but he/she was always "snuff video, MP, HI."


Title: Lively Case Discussion #561 12/16 - 12/18/2006
Post by: Tylergal on December 18, 2006, 10:51:02 AM
To our beautiful Lady Peaches, I do hope that everything is miniscule, just a cyst that can be aspirated and you will be fine.  Ah, 'tis the season.  I recall your having gone through so much last year about this time, but how courageous and what a spirit you had and still do.  I know it is discouraging and Christmas is certainly a time when we do 'not need this,' but I trust it will all be over so that you will have a wonderful 2007.  We all love you and cheer for you and applaud your courage and faith.  You remain "my hero."

I am praying for you and wishing the best of years in the one upcoming.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #561 12/16 - 12/18/2006
Post by: Tylergal on December 18, 2006, 10:51:57 AM
Quote from: "klaasend"
Quote from: "the big hammer"
Agreed (that I agreed...)

Klaas writes: Hammer was agreeing with you. When Hammer said "not here" he meant he did not shoot down your theory of the snuff film.

Yes, that's what I meant.  

Still alot of open questions and actual cause of death are unknown.  As I posted above, however, if one knew the script/storyline of the "movie," then alot of progress could be made.

IMO.

.

Hammer - I still believe that film was broadcast via the internet or cell phone that night.  It's out there somewhere, I just know it.


ergo the virus on the computer.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #561 12/16 - 12/18/2006
Post by: Tylergal on December 18, 2006, 10:56:25 AM
BRITISH POLICE ARREST SUSPECT IN CONNECTION WITH IPSWICH PROSTITUTE MURDERS


Title: Lively Case Discussion #561 12/16 - 12/18/2006
Post by: sirensong on December 18, 2006, 11:00:05 AM
I love Dr. Phil!! I also think a film was made, but I pray it wasn't a snuff film.  Hang in there peaches-lots of friends praying for you, including me.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #561 12/16 - 12/18/2006
Post by: Nut44x4 on December 18, 2006, 11:00:08 AM
Quote from: "klaasend"
This is the design I used for the small poster that's in Cafepress.  I added Hammer's picture CBB created to this one that I'll post to start the next LCD thread. Kindof late now to change the picture in Caferess.:

(http://i37.photobucket.com/albums/e82/klaasend2/smtreeFinal2holidayPoster3small.jpg)



 :D Thanks for adding my Mini Monster Truck to the small poster  :wink:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #561 12/16 - 12/18/2006
Post by: MsVada on December 18, 2006, 11:03:59 AM
Quote from: "robots"
Quote from: "Ms.DarthVada"
Quote from: "Lala'sMom"
Good morning monkeys.  Coffee anyone?



mornin' lala's

actually, with the mornin; I've had,  I'm ready for a stiff drink! :shock:



 :shock:  :lol:



One of my friends 17yo son was hit by a pickup truck last night and killed. :shock:   He goes to school with my son.  (this happened less than 5 miles from where Coreen Wiese dissappeared from)
And my 42 yo cousin passed away in his sleep saturday around dinner time.  He took a nap after work sautrday and never woke up. His kids found him.  :(

Such a crappy time of year for tragedy


Title: Lively Case Discussion #561 12/16 - 12/18/2006
Post by: MsVada on December 18, 2006, 11:07:03 AM
Hey Nut44x4

I see you are in maine too.  Whereabouts?

I'm near Sebago Lake


Title: Lively Case Discussion #561 12/16 - 12/18/2006
Post by: Tylergal on December 18, 2006, 11:14:43 AM
Quote from: "Ms.DarthVada"
Hey Nut44x4

I see you are in maine too.  Whereabouts?

I'm near Sebago Lake


My BIL passed away this morning.  Having not awakend at his usual time his wife went to arouse him as he had a civic club breakfast meet this morning and she found he was not breathing.  so very sad.  

It is going to be a sad time for this family, and having lost my mother at this time of year, where as I had always viewed Christmas with such excitement;however, subsequent to her death during the holidays, I always feel a little sadness creeping in each year.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #561 12/16 - 12/18/2006
Post by: robots on December 18, 2006, 11:18:40 AM
Quote from: "Ms.DarthVada"
Quote from: "robots"
Quote from: "Ms.DarthVada"
Quote from: "Lala'sMom"
Good morning monkeys.  Coffee anyone?



mornin' lala's

actually, with the mornin; I've had,  I'm ready for a stiff drink! :shock:



 :shock:  :lol:



One of my friends 17yo son was hit by a pickup truck last night and killed. :shock:   He goes to school with my son.  (this happened less than 5 miles from where Coreen Wiese dissappeared from)
And my 42 yo cousin passed away in his sleep saturday around dinner time.  He took a nap after work sautrday and never woke up. His kids found him.  :(

Such a crappy time of year for tragedy


lots of Mainers...here

are there any robots ????
 8)


Title: Lively Case Discussion #561 12/16 - 12/18/2006
Post by: MsVada on December 18, 2006, 11:23:19 AM
Hi Tyler

That is sad too.  I'm still in shock about my son's classmate.  Its hard enough that so many kids there are still hoping they find Coreen Wiese who dissappeared on 11/8th.  

Now this.  I am just so sad today. :cry:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #561 12/16 - 12/18/2006
Post by: Tylergal on December 18, 2006, 11:25:54 AM
Ms. Darth Vader, that is so sad about the 17-year-old son.  Man, that is bad.  You have had a lot of bad news in the last few days.  I agree, 42 is too young to die.  There definitely needs to be an autopsy to see what undiagnosed illness was going on, just for the family's satisfaction and for genetic testing of any family members who might have same.

That is all so sad.  My sympathy is with all of you and especially the family of the 17 year old child (whose family and friends must be very, very shocked and grieved).


Title: Lively Case Discussion #561 12/16 - 12/18/2006
Post by: Anna on December 18, 2006, 11:28:25 AM
Quote from: "Tylergal"
BRITISH POLICE ARREST SUSPECT IN CONNECTION WITH IPSWICH PROSTITUTE MURDERS



http://tinyurl.com/so3cy


Title: Lively Case Discussion #561 12/16 - 12/18/2006
Post by: Anna on December 18, 2006, 11:33:11 AM
Quote from: "Tylergal"
Quote from: "klaasend"
Quote from: "the big hammer"
Agreed (that I agreed...)

Klaas writes: Hammer was agreeing with you. When Hammer said "not here" he meant he did not shoot down your theory of the snuff film.

Yes, that's what I meant.  

Still alot of open questions and actual cause of death are unknown.  As I posted above, however, if one knew the script/storyline of the "movie," then alot of progress could be made.

IMO.

.

Hammer - I still believe that film was broadcast via the internet or cell phone that night.  It's out there somewhere, I just know it.


ergo the virus on the computer.



The eight and a half minute transmission from I believe it was Joran to Deepak has not been reflected in any records we have seen.  Lots of things appear to be missing in that regard and others.  Very sketchy reports only released and computers not sent to NFI as originally reported but to this Dutch Rural group conducting the latest research.

So what happened to the 8 and 1/2 minute transmission?


.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #561 12/16 - 12/18/2006
Post by: Anna on December 18, 2006, 11:36:11 AM
Quote from: "IndyDan"
[
It comes on at 3 here in Indy.  I think I'll pack up the laptop, grab a pizza and finish working the afternoon from home.  Don't want to miss anything the Doc has to say about the suit.



3 pm also here in Huntsville, AL area but 5 pm in Chattanooga.  I think some monkeys will have already seen it by this time so maybe they will give us a heads up.

.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #561 12/16 - 12/18/2006
Post by: klaasend on December 18, 2006, 11:42:48 AM
Quote from: "Anna"
Quote from: "IndyDan"
[
It comes on at 3 here in Indy.  I think I'll pack up the laptop, grab a pizza and finish working the afternoon from home.  Don't want to miss anything the Doc has to say about the suit.



3 pm also here in Huntsville, AL area but 5 pm in Chattanooga.  I think some monkeys will have already seen it by this time so maybe they will give us a heads up.

.


Someone on another site that already saw the show said nothing really new that we didn't already know.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #561 12/16 - 12/18/2006
Post by: AZLady on December 18, 2006, 11:46:03 AM
Hi Monkeys.  We get Dr. Phil here at 6 PM, I think.  It's either 6 PM or 7 PM--I need to check.  I get all messed up with daylight saving time and no daylight savings time...  Anyway, we get the show in the evening, so I'm watching for updates here today.

Tyler, I'm so sorry about your BIL.  I know what you mean about the sadness.  My mother lost her mother at the age of 12 the day before Christmas in a car accident.  She has hated the season as long as I can remember.  They always take a trip over Christmas so as to be in new surroundings and avoid the sadness.  This year my husband and I and my sister and her husband are going with Mom and Dad on a cruise to the western Caribbean, Belize, Honduras, Cozumel, Costa Maya.  We leave next Saturday, the 23rd and will return home on the 30th.  I'm looking forward to it.

Ms.DarthVada, I'm so sorry about your son's classmate.  Tragedy at any time of year is difficult, but when a young person is involved, it doubles the sadness and pain.  Take care and be strong.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #561 12/16 - 12/18/2006
Post by: MsVada on December 18, 2006, 11:46:41 AM
Thanks Tylergal

I am in such disbelief right now.  I've been trying to reach his Mom, without success yet.



I didn't think there were but 1 or 2 others posting here from Maine.  I know Artcolley was in Maine, but I haven't seen him post here in a few months.

Robots in maine?  You'd better be switching to 10w30 oil, as its going to finally get cold here soon!!  haha


Title: Lively Case Discussion #561 12/16 - 12/18/2006
Post by: AZLady on December 18, 2006, 11:47:28 AM
Quote from: "klaasend"
Quote from: "Anna"
Quote from: "IndyDan"
[
It comes on at 3 here in Indy.  I think I'll pack up the laptop, grab a pizza and finish working the afternoon from home.  Don't want to miss anything the Doc has to say about the suit.



3 pm also here in Huntsville, AL area but 5 pm in Chattanooga.  I think some monkeys will have already seen it by this time so maybe they will give us a heads up.

.


Someone on another site that already saw the show said nothing really new that we didn't already know.


That doesn't surprise.  Monkeys aways have the latest info--and they get it first.  Dr. Phil delivers the latest to the rest of the country who don't know yet.  He has a huge audience, so this will be good for keeping the story alive.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #561 12/16 - 12/18/2006
Post by: Kimmy53 on December 18, 2006, 11:50:38 AM
Ms.Darth Vader - I am so sorry to hear of your son's friend.  So tragic.  and also your cousin.  It is so sad.

Tyler I am also sorry about your BIL.  Similar to your mom, My dad died a week after Christmas 8 years ago, and this time of the year is bittersweet for me as well

I received some bad news about a friend who is battling lung cancer.  His kidneys have shut down and he is now on Morphine to keep him comfortable as he has been in a tremendous amount of pain.  He is only given a few days to live.  It is heartbreaking.

I will keep all in my prayers as well as remember those who are going thru this holiday without their loved ones.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #561 12/16 - 12/18/2006
Post by: AZLady on December 18, 2006, 11:52:23 AM
I, also, think the 8 1/2 minute transmission on the phones from Joran to Deepak is the snuff film they made with Natalee.  If not a snuff, at least it was a porno film.  I hadn't heard about a virus, but that would not be unusual as I believe many of the porno websites have viruses they place on your computer when you visit there.  A type of tracking mechanism or trojan, actually.  When you think back to the statements by K Janssen and others, whenever they mention the 8 1/2 minute call, it is always with a suggestive and close-mouthed manner, refusing to speculate as to its contents, but the attitude is quite obvious.  This is a signicant transmission.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #561 12/16 - 12/18/2006
Post by: AZLady on December 18, 2006, 11:53:49 AM
Quote from: "Kimmy53"
Ms.Darth Vader - I am so sorry to hear of your son's friend.  So tragic.  and also your cousin.  It is so sad.

Tyler I am also sorry about your BIL.  Similar to your mom, My dad died a week after Christmas 8 years ago, and this time of the year is bittersweet for me as well

I received some bad news about a friend who is battling lung cancer.  His kidneys have shut down and he is now on Morphine to keep him comfortable as he has been in a tremendous amount of pain.  He is only given a few days to live.  It is heartbreaking.

I will keep all in my prayers as well as remember those who are going thru this holiday without their loved ones.


Kimmy, my deep sympathies for your friend.  My heart goes out to you as it is so difficult to lose friends and family when we are here trudging along day by day.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #561 12/16 - 12/18/2006
Post by: klaasend on December 18, 2006, 11:57:26 AM
Posted in the TripAdvisor forums then quickly deleted:
bakabl
Guest
Posted: Mon Jun 06, 2005 1:00 am

Post subject: Natalee Holloway Questions to be asked of the Two Men

Frist Im vary sorry to hear of the vary sad case of Natalee Holloway in such a wonderful place like Aruba but it could happen anywere at any time. There are a few questions that need to be asked of the two men that the FBI are questioning - 1st ask them about the drink that was given to Natalee around 3:15am Aruba Time the morring Natalee never retyrn to her hotel and ask them about what the drug was in the drink that Natalee drunk without her knowing. 2nd ask them about the boat and the 2-1/2 mile trip they took. They should break dowm and tell the truth about are were Natalee can be found.

Posted in a Canadian newspaper June 7, 2005

(http://i37.photobucket.com/albums/e82/klaasend2/cartoonnatalee.jpg)


Title: Lively Case Discussion #561 12/16 - 12/18/2006
Post by: blah on December 18, 2006, 12:07:51 PM
Quote from: "klaasend"
From the Dr. Phil website about todays show:

“And I want you Dr. Phil, and John Kelly, and the team that you have, that’s who I want to find the answers because the Aruban government is not going to do anything,” Beth says.

“Well, you’ve got a great lawyer in John Kelly, so I know we’re all going to stay the course. And I’m sorry that we’re having to do it, but Natalee deserves nothing less,” Dr. Phil tells her.


this is great.  Looks like Beth has cut Greta off and gotten strong support from Dr Phil.  I think Dr Phil is much more powerful and will not be intimidated as Greta was.  I think he will not sell Beth out and will stand up to the bullies.  

what time is this show on?


Title: Lively Case Discussion #561 12/16 - 12/18/2006
Post by: yapperz1 on December 18, 2006, 12:08:18 PM
Hiya Monkeys

AZ, We are going on a cruise the 23rd to some of the ports you named. Maybe our ships will be in one of the ports on the same day.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #561 12/16 - 12/18/2006
Post by: BTgirl on December 18, 2006, 12:09:32 PM
Klaas,

Do you know if anyone ever managed to contact the person who drew that cartoon?


Title: Lively Case Discussion #561 12/16 - 12/18/2006
Post by: Peaches on December 18, 2006, 12:10:10 PM
Quote from: "tcumom"
Peaches ~ Hopefully, the minute the cyst is *taken care of*, your pain will diminish.  Glad your next chemo is after the big day ~ take care, and I always anxiously await your postings after you've had a treatment ~ want to hear that you're okay!


I'm back!  Looks like I get to have oral surgery this Thursday a.m.  I screwed it up today because I went in having drank coffee.  As I'm sitting there with the nurse, I see her eyeing the Diet Coke.  So today he just poked around and banged on my teeth.  Nice.  Stopped by my regular doc's office for some pain pills and some prescription for my hubby.  So I need to make a pharmacy trip now too.  Great.  Anyway, I'm okay for today.  I think I have enough pain meds and Advil to last me until Thursday.  

I think Deepak really did  everyone a favor by filing this suit, that is, if he actually pursues it.  Big difference between filing and following through.  Discovery isn't cheap.  Depositions aren't cheap, especially if you opt for video which would only be smart here.  I'm trying to be patient.  I really am.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #561 12/16 - 12/18/2006
Post by: blah on December 18, 2006, 12:11:38 PM
Quote from: "Tylergal"
Quote from: "LouiseVargas"
SB,

I presented the idea of a snuff film and it was shot down. Monkeys said the Daniel Pearl film was snuff but I don't agree. Snuff films refer directly to sex. Don't ask me how I know. That is their value. They are rare and I would assume they are very expensive.


Our e-mailer person who quit e-mailing about August last year and who e-mailed from a different e-mail address each day from Aruba, told DH very early (via e-mail, of course) it was a snuff video.  I am not sure why said person quit writing, if person was scared off, if person was terminated, or what but there was no way we could respond to e-mails.  They would be returned  each time, but he/she was always "snuff video, MP, HI."


who is DH ?


Title: Lively Case Discussion #561 12/16 - 12/18/2006
Post by: Peaches on December 18, 2006, 12:14:07 PM
Quote from: "LilPuma"
Quote from: "tcumom"
Peaches ~ Hopefully, the minute the cyst is *taken care of*, your pain will diminish.  Glad your next chemo is after the big day ~ take care, and I always anxiously await your postings after you've had a treatment ~ want to hear that you're okay!


If we know when Peaches is going for her chemo, could we remind everyone that day and a day or so after to keep sending prayers and healing, feel good thoughts her way throughout the day, especially on those days?


It will be Dec. 27th.  No. 8 in a series of twelve.  Dec. 27th is also the one year anniversary of my surgery.  WOOHOO!  And I'm hear to tell about it!  I have a blessed life.  You all are such a special blessing to me.  You're always here and you always say the right things.  Thank you.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #561 12/16 - 12/18/2006
Post by: BTgirl on December 18, 2006, 12:16:20 PM
Please forgive me if this blows the margins. I tested it in the lounge so I don't think it will be too bad.

This is for everyone here who is experiencing loss, pain, and sorrow today.

(http://i35.photobucket.com/albums/d162/Muzzydog/sympathycard.jpg)


Title: Lively Case Discussion #561 12/16 - 12/18/2006
Post by: blah on December 18, 2006, 12:16:34 PM
Quote from: "blah"
Quote from: "klaasend"
From the Dr. Phil website about todays show:

“And I want you Dr. Phil, and John Kelly, and the team that you have, that’s who I want to find the answers because the Aruban government is not going to do anything,” Beth says.

“Well, you’ve got a great lawyer in John Kelly, so I know we’re all going to stay the course. And I’m sorry that we’re having to do it, but Natalee deserves nothing less,” Dr. Phil tells her.


this is great.  Looks like Beth has cut Greta off and gotten strong support from Dr Phil.  I think Dr Phil is much more powerful and will not be intimidated as Greta was.  I think he will not sell Beth out and will stand up to the bullies.  

what time is this show on?


maybe "cut - off" is not the right word.  Probably less dependant on or less trusting of...


Title: Lively Case Discussion #561 12/16 - 12/18/2006
Post by: BTgirl on December 18, 2006, 12:17:43 PM
Quote from: "blah"
Quote from: "Tylergal"
Quote from: "LouiseVargas"
SB,

I presented the idea of a snuff film and it was shot down. Monkeys said the Daniel Pearl film was snuff but I don't agree. Snuff films refer directly to sex. Don't ask me how I know. That is their value. They are rare and I would assume they are very expensive.


Our e-mailer person who quit e-mailing about August last year and who e-mailed from a different e-mail address each day from Aruba, told DH very early (via e-mail, of course) it was a snuff video.  I am not sure why said person quit writing, if person was scared off, if person was terminated, or what but there was no way we could respond to e-mails.  They would be returned  each time, but he/she was always "snuff video, MP, HI."


who is DH ?


Blah, I think Tyler is using the abbreviation for Dear Hubby.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #561 12/16 - 12/18/2006
Post by: Peaches on December 18, 2006, 12:18:24 PM
Quote from: "Ms.DarthVada"
Quote from: "Lala'sMom"
Good morning monkeys.  Coffee anyone?



mornin' lala's

actually, with the mornin; I've had,  I'm ready for a stiff drink! :shock:


I hear that!  I suddenly have a memory of my daughter teething and my pediatrician telling me I should use Amaretto on her gums.  It would taste good AND make her sleepy.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #561 12/16 - 12/18/2006
Post by: klaasend on December 18, 2006, 12:19:00 PM
Quote from: "BTgirl"
Klaas,

Do you know if anyone ever managed to contact the person who drew that cartoon?

I emailed him as did several others.  I never got a response.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #561 12/16 - 12/18/2006
Post by: BTgirl on December 18, 2006, 12:19:34 PM
Quote from: "klaasend"
Quote from: "BTgirl"
Klaas,

Do you know if anyone ever managed to contact the person who drew that cartoon?

I emailed him as did several others.  I never got a response.


Thanks.

Hmmm....it certainly would be interesting to know what he knew and when he knew it, as they say.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #561 12/16 - 12/18/2006
Post by: Peaches on December 18, 2006, 12:20:14 PM
Quote from: "Tylergal"
To our beautiful Lady Peaches, I do hope that everything is miniscule, just a cyst that can be aspirated and you will be fine.  Ah, 'tis the season.  I recall your having gone through so much last year about this time, but how courageous and what a spirit you had and still do.  I know it is discouraging and Christmas is certainly a time when we do 'not need this,' but I trust it will all be over so that you will have a wonderful 2007.  We all love you and cheer for you and applaud your courage and faith.  You remain "my hero."

I am praying for you and wishing the best of years in the one upcoming.


Thank you so much.  You touch my heart.  (I use that beautiful rose as my desktop at the office.)


Title: Lively Case Discussion #561 12/16 - 12/18/2006
Post by: blah on December 18, 2006, 12:23:09 PM
Quote from: "BTgirl"
Quote from: "blah"
Quote from: "Tylergal"
Quote from: "LouiseVargas"
SB,

I presented the idea of a snuff film and it was shot down. Monkeys said the Daniel Pearl film was snuff but I don't agree. Snuff films refer directly to sex. Don't ask me how I know. That is their value. They are rare and I would assume they are very expensive.


Our e-mailer person who quit e-mailing about August last year and who e-mailed from a different e-mail address each day from Aruba, told DH very early (via e-mail, of course) it was a snuff video.  I am not sure why said person quit writing, if person was scared off, if person was terminated, or what but there was no way we could respond to e-mails.  They would be returned  each time, but he/she was always "snuff video, MP, HI."


who is DH ?


Blah, I think Tyler is using the abbreviation for Dear Hubby.


do they post here?  I have not heard about this before....


Title: Lively Case Discussion #561 12/16 - 12/18/2006
Post by: Peaches on December 18, 2006, 12:24:51 PM
Blah, DH is like an abbreviation.  Like DD for dear daughter, which I use all the time.  It's not a nic.  

I loved that pic the other day of the holiday nutz.  Reminds me of  the swinging you.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #561 12/16 - 12/18/2006
Post by: BTgirl on December 18, 2006, 12:26:24 PM
Quote from: "blah"

do they post here?  I have not heard about this before....


I hate to speak for Tyler, cause I could be totally wrong. However, I do remember her saying that her husband has posted on some different boards from time to time, although I don't know if he has ever posted at SM. I know Anna has said she had some discussions with him. That's why I assumed the DH Tyler referred to was her husband.

Tyler, if you see this and I am totally wrong, please for give me.  :oops:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #561 12/16 - 12/18/2006
Post by: crazybabyborg on December 18, 2006, 12:30:07 PM
Quote from: "klaasend"
Quote from: "BTgirl"
Klaas,

Do you know if anyone ever managed to contact the person who drew that cartoon?

I emailed him as did several others.  I never got a response.


That cartoon is one of the most intriquing things, to me, about this case. I hope someone was able to question him. What do we know about this guy: I can't remember.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #561 12/16 - 12/18/2006
Post by: Peaches on December 18, 2006, 12:30:45 PM
Off to the pharmacy.  BBL :lol:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #561 12/16 - 12/18/2006
Post by: Anna on December 18, 2006, 12:34:30 PM
Quote from: "BTgirl"
Quote from: "klaasend"
Quote from: "BTgirl"
Klaas,

Do you know if anyone ever managed to contact the person who drew that cartoon?

I emailed him as did several others.  I never got a response.


Thanks.

Hmmm....it certainly would be interesting to know what he knew and when he knew it, as they say.



I also emailed him and received no response.  Think Justinsmama and others did as well with same results.

But I would like to know just how he came up with that cartoon considering the timing.

.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #561 12/16 - 12/18/2006
Post by: Anna on December 18, 2006, 12:38:23 PM
Quote from: "BTgirl"
Quote from: "blah"

do they post here?  I have not heard about this before....


I hate to speak for Tyler, cause I could be totally wrong. However, I do remember her saying that her husband has posted on some different boards from time to time, although I don't know if he has ever posted at SM. I know Anna has said she had some discussions with him. That's why I assumed the DH Tyler referred to was her husband.

Tyler, if you see this and I am totally wrong, please for give me.  :oops:



I simply adore Tyler's DH!  He is a gentleman and a scholar for sure.  He did post a great deal in the early days but I have not known of him to do so since them.  Back to the early RWV days but would not be surprised if many of his posts, along with my own, have disappeared or been Reihlerized.  What a shame, too.

But he always felt the HI was more involved than we have been led to believe and had a number of excellent sources and theories.



.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #561 12/16 - 12/18/2006
Post by: 2NJSons_Mom on December 18, 2006, 12:38:47 PM
Quote from: "crazybabyborg"
Quote from: "klaasend"
Quote from: "BTgirl"
Klaas,

Do you know if anyone ever managed to contact the person who drew that cartoon?

I emailed him as did several others.  I never got a response.


That cartoon is one of the most intriquing things, to me, about this case. I hope someone was able to question him. What do we know about this guy: I can't remember.


I was trying to recall his name, and am thinking diber....something.  If it was posted already, I've not finished reading back.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #561 12/16 - 12/18/2006
Post by: crazybabyborg on December 18, 2006, 12:42:19 PM
OMG!!!  :shock:

I MISSED the Dr. Phil show!!!!! :cry:  :cry:  :cry:

Came on at 10:00 am here!!!


Title: Lively Case Discussion #561 12/16 - 12/18/2006
Post by: MsVada on December 18, 2006, 12:43:04 PM
BT Girl

Thanks for your lovely picture and kiind words.  

Thanks everyone for the support.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #561 12/16 - 12/18/2006
Post by: crazybabyborg on December 18, 2006, 12:44:45 PM
I'm confused. The show description says the topic is about over the counter medicines that kids use to get high..............


Title: Lively Case Discussion #561 12/16 - 12/18/2006
Post by: IndyDan on December 18, 2006, 12:47:17 PM
Quote from: "blah"
Quote from: "klaasend"
From the Dr. Phil website about todays show:

“And I want you Dr. Phil, and John Kelly, and the team that you have, that’s who I want to find the answers because the Aruban government is not going to do anything,” Beth says.

“Well, you’ve got a great lawyer in John Kelly, so I know we’re all going to stay the course. And I’m sorry that we’re having to do it, but Natalee deserves nothing less,” Dr. Phil tells her.


this is great.  Looks like Beth has cut Greta off and gotten strong support from Dr Phil.  I think Dr Phil is much more powerful and will not be intimidated as Greta was.  I think he will not sell Beth out and will stand up to the bullies.  

what time is this show on?


You're right and I certainly don't see Dr Phil smooching ArubaJoeBlowhard's hiney like Greta does either.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #561 12/16 - 12/18/2006
Post by: 2NJSons_Mom on December 18, 2006, 12:51:20 PM
Quote from: "crazybabyborg"
I'm confused. The show description says the topic is about over the counter medicines that kids use to get high..............


I just checked www.drphil.com and the video preview includes Beth.  It will be aired at 3PM ET in my area.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #561 12/16 - 12/18/2006
Post by: Sue on December 18, 2006, 12:52:51 PM

This was posted on my bullitin on My space..  My Natalee page run by Stephanie R Good




His email address is at the end of the article! Let's show this obnoxious guy that Natalee's family has many supporters!

Opinion Editorials.com

December 18, 2006

Natalee Holloway: Is no jurisdiction safe from Twitty lawsuits; Parents declare Natalee Dead
Steve Yuhas

When we last left the Twitty family we were in New York where Beth Twitty helped created a media star out of a process server who was able to boast to the world that he served Joran van der Sloot and his father with a frivolous lawsuit. It accused the two of kidnapping Natalee Holloway and a litany of other charges, but didn’t make the leap to murder. Sometime between that lawsuit and one filed recently in California something changed and Natalee has been declared dead by her family.

The latter case accuses Deepak and Satish Kalpoe of wrongful death and is asking that a California court to find the brothers responsible.

That lawsuit piggybacks one filed by the Kalpoe brothers against pseudo-therapist psycho-babbling man hating talk show host Phil McGraw claiming that he manipulated an interview that made the two look guilty. McGraw has been Beth Twitty’s lapdog for over a year so it is no surprise that if you look at the accusations it really looks like the man who wants to be Oprah did exactly what the brothers claim.

It is interesting that no lawsuits have been filed anywhere that Beth Twitty, Natalee Holloway or the rest of her kin-folk have any connection. Why are they not suing anyone in Alabama? I’d start with the chaperones; they are in Alabama and were in Aruba when Natalee disappeared and at least one told a different story from some people on the same trip, but they’re not in court.

The only thing happening in Alabama is collecting money for the Natalee Holloway Trust, coordinating Beth’s speaking tour and book and movie deals. Surely if the Kalpoe brothers can be sued in California for a death in Aruba, the chaperones can be sued in Alabama for negligence.

When the Kalpoe suit was filed Beth Twitty put out a statement saying, "All we want is justice for our daughter…there is no doubt in my mind that Deepak and Satish played a role in my daughter's death and should be held accountable. It's unconscionable that they have not been punished so far."

Not been punished? They’ve been branded as killers by every television and radio host south of the Mason Dixon Line; whenever there is a slow news day their pictures are plastered on every show that the always reliable Beth Twitty can appear on. The Twitty and Holloway family has made accusations of murder and deceit against both the Kalpoe brothers and the van der Sloots; they’ve slandered the justice system in Aruba as well as the police and went to the island to harass the people they think killed their daughter. The Kalpoe brothers have been beleaguered by back water psychotherapists, a television critic that drove a woman to suicide and Twitty herself at their place of work (cameras following of course).

Not one serious question has ever been posed to a member of Natalee Holloway’s family yet all of the people being sued have been arrested at least once and held without charges for months at a time.

The Kalpoe’s and van der Sloots have been more than punished. So too have the people of Aruba when placating southern governors called for a boycott of Aruba. Now an entire group of brainwashed knee jerk Twitty followers exist who wait to insert themselves into the story because they want to be part of it. I can’t tell you how many emails I get from a “close friend” or “relative” of the Twitty - Holloway clan. I know the south is interesting for population growth, but no family can be that incestuous. Nobody likes a dead girl, but these people are brainwashed into believing anything the Twitty media instrument puts out. They’re like the folks who stand outside a house where a child is missing and bring teddy bears; it does nothing to bring the kid home, but by gosh they feel good for doing it.

Justice for Natalee Holloway is not going to come in the form of a civil suit in any state; especially one in which they have no connection. I think O.J. Simpson is a pretty good barometer of a civil suit for wrongful death not bringing justice to anyone: ask the Brown or Goldman families if they have justice yet.

Natalee was an adult sent on vacation by a family who knows she is not coming home. She was obviously the victim of a crime, but her parents will not accept the fact that they sent an ill equipped young woman on a vacation and she was not prepared to deal with it. When you visit a foreign country you take risks and it is risky to get in a car with a man or men you don’t know. If you take everything Beth Twitty said as true Natalee was a naïve young woman. Still, she was packed up for a plane ride to a place where the first question out of a kid’s mouth is “what is the drinking age?”

Any suggestion that her parents are partially to blame for sending their daughter to Aruba with friends that simply waved her off when she left a bar with a man she didn’t know or with chaperones who say their job was to get the kids to the hospital if they were bitten by a shark, but not to make sure they were not raped or murdered, is met with utter contempt by their family and their knee jerk supporters.

Beth says she is suing for answers – huh? The Kalpoe brothers are not going to give any more information to the attorneys for Beth Twitty than they gave to prosecutors in Aruba and they have no assets to speak of so this is about keeping Natalee on the front page of slow news cycles and nothing more. They admit that Natalee is dead so there is nothing to be gained; what possible good will come from filing a lawsuit against people with no assets in a state with no connection to the alleged crime?

Lawsuits being filed all over the country is a nice touch and makes for good talk show fodder, but is futile. Beth Twitty has come to the conclusion that her daughter is dead, now she has to accept that her case is cold and may never be solved. There is no body, there is no evidence of a crime, there are contradictions by the chaperones and the students that were traveling with Natalee when she disappeared and more than a year and a half has created a situation where civil suits in all 50 states will not change any of the facts or make anything better.

One would think that someone coordinating the speaking tour for Beth Twitty (imagine that woman telling kids of the dangers of travel – talk about day late and dollar short) would tell her that she looks foolish accusing van der Sloot of kidnapping one day and the Kalpoe brothers of murder the next. She is making a mockery of the judicial system by suing in every jurisdiction except where the incident allegedly happened and not suing people, like the chaperones, who were actually there and entrusted with the care of her dauther.

If there were evidence against anyone in the death or disappearance of Natalee Holloway it would have been found by now and it hasn’t. The dysfunctional Alabamans can continue this ridiculous circus of lawsuits and accusations, but it will not get them anything more than they already have: a tragically dead daughter and that is what their focus should be on. Even if the Kalpoe brothers are found responsible by a California court for Natalee Holloway’s death – what will that do for the Twitty or Holloway family?

This whole mess is the result of a mother out of control, a father with a book deal and the failure of the authorities in Aruba to solve the case. They want to, but if the evidence is not there nothing can be done and no matter how much Greta or Nancy cries about it nothing will change that one fundamental fact.

It is good, though, that the Twitty-Holloway families have finally acknowledged that their daughter is dead. They should consider her lost at sea, hold a funeral, mark a gravesite and stop the ridiculous and laughable behavior that takes place whenever one of the cable shows don’t have a Duke rape case debacle to report on. Live shots from Aruba were nice; it is a great place to visit, but the case is as solved as it is ever going to be and the only thing left to learn is lessons on what not to do as a parent sending your kid on a vacation that they are not mature enough to handle.

Steve Yuhas is a radio talk show host on NewsRadio 600 KOGO in southern California and may be reached at steve@steveyuhas.com or www.steveyuhas.com


Title: Lively Case Discussion #561 12/16 - 12/18/2006
Post by: Tamikosmom on December 18, 2006, 12:54:25 PM
I cannot fathom why the Kalpoes' "team" of attorneys did not anticipate the wrongful death suit being put into place once jurisdiction was established.

This detective wannabe adheres to a theory that the two lawsuits are all part of a master plan in order for the pieces of the puzzle to fit.

I speculate that John Q. Kelly and the Kalpoe's "team of attorneys" have collaborated and ..... put this entire chain of events into play.

A plea deal has been established with Deepak and Satish which will allow them them the protection in the US from the "powers that be" in Aruba in exchange for their testimony that will expose the truth regarding the answers that the family is seeking.

Think about it .... Who are paying this team of attorneys .... certainly not the "powers that be" in Aruba. The ATA must be freaking out. Those involved in the coverup must be freaking out. Those who participated in the events that encompass the morning that Natalee Holloway went missing must be freaking out.

I speculate that this is soooo much bigger than the Kalpoes launching a lawsuit against Dr. Phil .... a lawsuit they know darn well they cannot win.

Janet


John Q Kelly



Greta Dec 14/06 TRANSCRIPT
Greta On The Record
December 14, 2006

Transcribed from recorded video on December 15, 2006

Greta:

Who are their lawyers? Are they american lawyers or aruban lawyers?

John:

It's my understanding they have a team of lawyers, both aruban and californian and Illinois lawyers working on this.

Greta

Did their american lawyers ever think perhaps if they filed this, that you were going to do exactly what you've done and now open their two clients up to depositions, interrogatories, requests for admissions, all these sorts of things which are the last things in the world that I suspect these two truly want to sit and answer.

JQK

You know I have to think that at some point it may have crossed their minds, it was a calculated risk the took wondering if we'd respond with a third party action related case.

___________

The Reason for the Season

(http://img90.imageshack.us/img90/7092/nativityfh0.jpg)


Title: Lively Case Discussion #561 12/16 - 12/18/2006
Post by: klaasend on December 18, 2006, 01:06:31 PM
Need to run some errands, be back in a bit.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #561 12/16 - 12/18/2006
Post by: LilPuma on December 18, 2006, 01:15:14 PM
Quote from: "crazybabyborg"
Beth SHOULD have been named in that suit. The papers talk about the tape and her comments working to "defame" DK's reputation. Slander is part of the filing, and to prove slander you MUST prove it was FALSE information that you were the source of. That would take Beth right where she wants to be; to ALL those questions she wants answered.


Good catch, Monkeys!  They didn't name Beth because it would not only be bad PR to go after the mother, but they didn't want the family to be able to countersue based on their filing!  Hopefully, JQK and CA counsel will be able to overcome that - if the Judge is willing to set a precedent.  They often don't.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #561 12/16 - 12/18/2006
Post by: Peaches on December 18, 2006, 01:45:33 PM
Yuhas is a real piece of work.  I bet his mother is proud.   :roll:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #561 12/16 - 12/18/2006
Post by: Peaches on December 18, 2006, 01:48:03 PM
The "Ain't She Sweet" link in my sig is a link to my husband's chorus on  YouTube.  It's from a few years ago but it's fun to watch nonetheless.  Especially for BT because I always try to connect with her when I'm in her neck of the woods for singing stuff.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #561 12/16 - 12/18/2006
Post by: Altruist on December 18, 2006, 01:54:35 PM
IMO, Yahas is a moron who should be ignored.  He likes the attention, makes him feel important.  He's as important as that occassional fly that gets in your house, I don't give him a 1st thought never mind a 2nd thought, his words are NOT WORTH READING.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #561 12/16 - 12/18/2006
Post by: AZLady on December 18, 2006, 01:57:48 PM
Quote from: "yapperz1"
Hiya Monkeys

AZ, We are going on a cruise the 23rd to some of the ports you named. Maybe our ships will be in one of the ports on the same day.


Yapperz, you are?  We are on the Grand Princess going out of Galveston on the 23rd?  Do you think we might be on the same trip?


Title: Lively Case Discussion #561 12/16 - 12/18/2006
Post by: AZLady on December 18, 2006, 02:00:03 PM
Quote from: "Peaches"
Quote from: "tcumom"
Peaches ~ Hopefully, the minute the cyst is *taken care of*, your pain will diminish.  Glad your next chemo is after the big day ~ take care, and I always anxiously await your postings after you've had a treatment ~ want to hear that you're okay!


I'm back!  Looks like I get to have oral surgery this Thursday a.m.  I screwed it up today because I went in having drank coffee.  As I'm sitting there with the nurse, I see her eyeing the Diet Coke.  So today he just poked around and banged on my teeth.  Nice.  Stopped by my regular doc's office for some pain pills and some prescription for my hubby.  So I need to make a pharmacy trip now too.  Great.  Anyway, I'm okay for today.  I think I have enough pain meds and Advil to last me until Thursday.  

I think Deepak really did  everyone a favor by filing this suit, that is, if he actually pursues it.  Big difference between filing and following through.  Discovery isn't cheap.  Depositions aren't cheap, especially if you opt for video which would only be smart here.  I'm trying to be patient.  I really am.


Peaches, good luck with the teeth and surgery.  I hate, hate, hate to have my teeth worked on.  I'll be thinking of you.  

I agree that Deepak did everyone a favor filing this suit.  I hope he has some backing to encourage him to follow it through.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #561 12/16 - 12/18/2006
Post by: BTgirl on December 18, 2006, 02:02:06 PM
Quote from: "Peaches"
The "Ain't She Sweet" link in my sig is a link to my husband's chorus on  YouTube.  It's from a few years ago but it's fun to watch nonetheless.  Especially for BT because I always try to connect with her when I'm in her neck of the woods for singing stuff.


TY for the great link, Peaches. When will you be in my neck of the woods again?


Title: Lively Case Discussion #561 12/16 - 12/18/2006
Post by: Sue on December 18, 2006, 02:05:36 PM


What I am wondering is if the kalpoes US lawyers will represent
them in teh wrongful death suit or if they will have to hire lawyers
for that case


Title: Lively Case Discussion #561 12/16 - 12/18/2006
Post by: AZLady on December 18, 2006, 02:12:22 PM
Yuhas is an idiot and his words are crap.  Nuff said.

Tamikosmom, I proposed the exact same theory as to the origin of the two lawsuits last Friday.  I agree.  It's the only explanation that makes sense other than the 2K's have totally lost their minds and are so greedy that they can't think straight.  I don't think either has happened yet.  I believe the 2K's traded asylum in the US and escape from an Aruban jail term in return for their testimony that will sink the van der Sloot ship.  I'm glad to hear someone else came to the same conclusions as I felt I was whistling in the wind when I explained this here last week.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #561 12/16 - 12/18/2006
Post by: AZLady on December 18, 2006, 02:13:22 PM
Quote from: "Sue"


What I am wondering is if the kalpoes US lawyers will represent
them in teh wrongful death suit or if they will have to hire lawyers
for that case


I'd be surprised if the lawyer who signed the filing defends them in the wrongful death suit.  She's an insurance specialist.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #561 12/16 - 12/18/2006
Post by: robots on December 18, 2006, 02:13:49 PM
DOCTOR EVIL is running skeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeered

back later

need to make some dough




im a robotic BAKER







 :twisted:  :twisted:  :twisted:  :twisted:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #561 12/16 - 12/18/2006
Post by: AZLady on December 18, 2006, 02:16:13 PM
Tamikosmom, the 2K's will be facing a civil suit here with no possibility of jail time as they would have in an Aruban trial.  This is the only way the Kalpoes were able to plea bargain their testimony for their freedom as the Dutch do not allow plea bargains.  So, telling the truth in Aruba would have just put the Kalpoes in jail along with the rest of the perps.  Personally, I think it is a brilliant plan and JQK is a brilliant strategist.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #561 12/16 - 12/18/2006
Post by: AZLady on December 18, 2006, 02:17:23 PM
Hi Robots.  Go make that dough!   :lol:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #561 12/16 - 12/18/2006
Post by: Sue on December 18, 2006, 02:17:27 PM
Quote from: "AZLady"
Quote from: "Sue"


What I am wondering is if the kalpoes US lawyers will represent
them in teh wrongful death suit or if they will have to hire lawyers
for that case


I'd be surprised if the lawyer who signed the filing defends them in the wrongful death suit.  She's an insurance specialist.


Well my thought is that this current suit these lawyers took the case
based on what they possibly would recieve in settlement..
If they have to hire other lawyers for wrongful death they will need money
I dont think a wrongful death lawyer will take this case Pro bono


Title: Lively Case Discussion #561 12/16 - 12/18/2006
Post by: AZLady on December 18, 2006, 02:19:24 PM
Quote from: "Sue"
Quote from: "AZLady"
Quote from: "Sue"


What I am wondering is if the kalpoes US lawyers will represent
them in teh wrongful death suit or if they will have to hire lawyers
for that case


I'd be surprised if the lawyer who signed the filing defends them in the wrongful death suit.  She's an insurance specialist.


Well my thought is that this current suit these lawyers took the case
based on what they possibly would recieve in settlement..
If they have to hire other lawyers for wrongful death they will need money
I dont think a wrongful death lawyer will take this case Pro bono


No, of course not.  No lawyer will defend a wrongful death suit pro bono.  However, I do think all these details have been arranged already.  Check my other posts.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #561 12/16 - 12/18/2006
Post by: AZLady on December 18, 2006, 02:28:35 PM
Quote from: "AZLady"
Quote from: "Sue"
Quote from: "AZLady"
Quote from: "Sue"


What I am wondering is if the kalpoes US lawyers will represent
them in teh wrongful death suit or if they will have to hire lawyers
for that case


I'd be surprised if the lawyer who signed the filing defends them in the wrongful death suit.  She's an insurance specialist.


Well my thought is that this current suit these lawyers took the case
based on what they possibly would recieve in settlement..
If they have to hire other lawyers for wrongful death they will need money
I dont think a wrongful death lawyer will take this case Pro bono


No, of course not.  No lawyer will defend a wrongful death suit pro bono.  However, I do think all these details have been arranged already.  Check my other posts.


Anybody seen the Dr. Phil show yet?  Any reports?


Title: Lively Case Discussion #561 12/16 - 12/18/2006
Post by: AZLady on December 18, 2006, 02:34:02 PM
Shout out to Aruba.  Hello there, Oranjestad!  How's it going on the island today?


Title: Lively Case Discussion #561 12/16 - 12/18/2006
Post by: yapperz1 on December 18, 2006, 02:38:09 PM
Quote from: "AZLady"
Quote from: "yapperz1"
Hiya Monkeys

AZ, We are going on a cruise the 23rd to some of the ports you named. Maybe our ships will be in one of the ports on the same day.


Yapperz, you are?  We are on the Grand Princess going out of Galveston on the 23rd?  Do you think we might be on the same trip?


We are departing from Tampa on Holland America's Veendam. Maybe our ships will be in the same port one of the days.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #561 12/16 - 12/18/2006
Post by: Sue on December 18, 2006, 02:39:44 PM
Quote from: "AZLady"
Shout out to Aruba.  Hello there, Oranjestad!  How's it going on the island today?



this is how Aruba is doing.....


(http://i62.photobucket.com/albums/h82/BigMouse1925/tarabeach-1.jpg)


Title: Lively Case Discussion #561 12/16 - 12/18/2006
Post by: AZLady on December 18, 2006, 02:43:15 PM
Klaas, can you give Yapperz my email so she can write to me?  Yapperz, if you will email me, we can compare itineraries and see if our paths will cross. That would really be cool! I'd love to meet a Monkey!


Title: Lively Case Discussion #561 12/16 - 12/18/2006
Post by: mishy on December 18, 2006, 02:50:37 PM
Quote from: "Peaches"
Quote from: "Tylergal"
To our beautiful Lady Peaches, I do hope that everything is miniscule, just a cyst that can be aspirated and you will be fine.  Ah, 'tis the season.  I recall your having gone through so much last year about this time, but how courageous and what a spirit you had and still do.  I know it is discouraging and Christmas is certainly a time when we do 'not need this,' but I trust it will all be over so that you will have a wonderful 2007.  We all love you and cheer for you and applaud your courage and faith.  You remain "my hero."

I am praying for you and wishing the best of years in the one upcoming.


Thank you so much.  You touch my heart.  (I use that beautiful rose as my desktop at the office.)


Peaches, I am just now reading this. I don't know what's going on, but please know that my prayers are with you, and I wholeheartedly echo Tylergal's most adequately worded sentiments. You are an inspiration to us all!!!


Title: Lively Case Discussion #561 12/16 - 12/18/2006
Post by: klaasend on December 18, 2006, 02:51:57 PM
Quote from: "AZLady"
Klaas, can you give Yapperz my email so she can write to me?  Yapperz, if you will email me, we can compare itineraries and see if our paths will cross. That would really be cool! I'd love to meet a Monkey!


I have way too many email addresses to remember who's is who's.  Both of you email me at smklaasend@hotmail.com and I'll sent Yapperz your email addy AZLady.  TIA


Title: Lively Case Discussion #561 12/16 - 12/18/2006
Post by: AZLady on December 18, 2006, 02:56:42 PM
Quote from: "klaasend"
Quote from: "AZLady"
Klaas, can you give Yapperz my email so she can write to me?  Yapperz, if you will email me, we can compare itineraries and see if our paths will cross. That would really be cool! I'd love to meet a Monkey!


I have way too many email addresses to remember who's is who's.  Both of you email me at smklaasend@hotmail.com and I'll sent Yapperz your email addy AZLady.  TIA


Done.  And, thank you, Klaas.  We appreciate you.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #561 12/16 - 12/18/2006
Post by: Kimmy53 on December 18, 2006, 02:57:01 PM
Quote from: "AZLady"
Yuhas is an idiot and his words are crap.  Nuff said.

Tamikosmom, I proposed the exact same theory as to the origin of the two lawsuits last Friday.  I agree.  It's the only explanation that makes sense other than the 2K's have totally lost their minds and are so greedy that they can't think straight.  I don't think either has happened yet.  I believe the 2K's traded asylum in the US and escape from an Aruban jail term in return for their testimony that will sink the van der Sloot ship.  I'm glad to hear someone else came to the same conclusions as I felt I was whistling in the wind when I explained this here last week.


AZLady & Tamikosmom:  I have had the same thoughts - and AZLady- I remember you writing this theory last week - I would have responded but have been so busy at work, I can barely get a minute to read...  There are alot of clues to this being a very real possibility.  I cannot believe someone would be so stupid as to think they could possibly win a lawsuit - even though they are still considered suspects, but then again this is the most bizarre case I have ever seen in my life.   All I know is the next little while will be VERY interesting.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #561 12/16 - 12/18/2006
Post by: klaasend on December 18, 2006, 02:59:54 PM
I want to know WHY after being MIA for approximately 8 months, WONDERWOMAN is suddenly posting again at RU?  Looks like she's despirately trying to place blame on the 2 security guards.  Wonderwoman only starting posting again after the lawsuits were announced.  :?:  :!:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #561 12/16 - 12/18/2006
Post by: mishy on December 18, 2006, 03:02:07 PM
Tylergal and MsDarthVada {{{BIG HUGS}}} and prayers for you and yours!!!!!

I'm tivoing Dr. Phil...I'm sure it won't be anything new. I got to where I stopped tivoing Greta months and months ago. I won't watch her unless it's a big scoop on the case...I've lost it for her totally...

That poor Yuhas...what a bitter SOB...Must suck to be him, seriously...

I love you guys, gonna get back to working and lurking again...


Title: Lively Case Discussion #561 12/16 - 12/18/2006
Post by: msmarple on December 18, 2006, 03:02:44 PM
Quote from: "klaasend"
I want to know WHY after being MIA for approximately 8 months, WONDERWOMAN is suddenly posting again at RU?  Looks like she's despirately trying to place blame on the 2 security guards.  Wonderwoman only starting posting again after the lawsuits were announced.  :?:  :!:


Well, what IS going on with the security guards? One still a suspect? One merely waiting for paperwork completion?

What's up with that?


Title: Lively Case Discussion #561 12/16 - 12/18/2006
Post by: mishy on December 18, 2006, 03:02:45 PM
Quote from: "klaasend"
I want to know WHY after being MIA for approximately 8 months, WONDERWOMAN is suddenly posting again at RU?  Looks like she's despirately trying to place blame on the 2 security guards.  Wonderwoman only starting posting again after the lawsuits were announced.  :?:  :!:


WW sure loves her some Deepak, doesn't she, Klaas?


Title: Lively Case Discussion #561 12/16 - 12/18/2006
Post by: AZLady on December 18, 2006, 03:05:15 PM
WW seems to come to Deepak's aid just like a good super-hero.  She needs to update her bag of tricks.  Casting blame on the beleaguered security guards is pathetic and really will not fly.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #561 12/16 - 12/18/2006
Post by: yapperz1 on December 18, 2006, 03:07:03 PM
Klaas I sent you an email too  LOL


Title: Lively Case Discussion #561 12/16 - 12/18/2006
Post by: Jacqueline on December 18, 2006, 03:10:34 PM
Quote from: "klaasend"
I want to know WHY after being MIA for approximately 8 months, WONDERWOMAN is suddenly posting again at RU?  Looks like she's despirately trying to place blame on the 2 security guards.  Wonderwoman only starting posting again after the lawsuits were announced.  :?:  :!:


Is that the same WW who used to post here, from Chi Town?


Title: Lively Case Discussion #561 12/16 - 12/18/2006
Post by: klaasend on December 18, 2006, 03:18:01 PM
Quote from: "Jacqueline"
Quote from: "klaasend"
I want to know WHY after being MIA for approximately 8 months, WONDERWOMAN is suddenly posting again at RU?  Looks like she's despirately trying to place blame on the 2 security guards.  Wonderwoman only starting posting again after the lawsuits were announced.  :?:  :!:


Is that the same WW who used to post here, from Chi Town?


Yes.  I would like to know if she has ties to Posner.  I'd also like to know how "close" she is to Deepak.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #561 12/16 - 12/18/2006
Post by: Peaches on December 18, 2006, 03:18:10 PM
Quote from: "BTgirl"
Quote from: "Peaches"
The "Ain't She Sweet" link in my sig is a link to my husband's chorus on  YouTube.  It's from a few years ago but it's fun to watch nonetheless.  Especially for BT because I always try to connect with her when I'm in her neck of the woods for singing stuff.


TY for the great link, Peaches. When will you be in my neck of the woods again?


I believe it will be Chattanooga in the fall.  Usually the first weekend in October if they can get the facility and hotels and stuff.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #561 12/16 - 12/18/2006
Post by: msmarple on December 18, 2006, 03:20:05 PM
O/T - Shout Out to Anna & Other Monkey Panda Fans -

(http://i23.photobucket.com/albums/b367/cli2/HiAnna.gif)

Panda Sneeze! (I do not know which pandas these are; maybe "ours" ??? )

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dtLzvOsQ80k


Title: Lively Case Discussion #561 12/16 - 12/18/2006
Post by: AZLady on December 18, 2006, 03:22:02 PM
Quote from: "klaasend"
Quote from: "Jacqueline"
Quote from: "klaasend"
I want to know WHY after being MIA for approximately 8 months, WONDERWOMAN is suddenly posting again at RU?  Looks like she's despirately trying to place blame on the 2 security guards.  Wonderwoman only starting posting again after the lawsuits were announced.  :?:  :!:


Is that the same WW who used to post here, from Chi Town?


Yes.  I would like to know if she has ties to Posner.  I'd also like to know how "close" she is to Deepak.


Don't know the answers to those relationships, but she is a member of the disinformation team, that's for sure.  Maybe a founding member...


Title: Lively Case Discussion #561 12/16 - 12/18/2006
Post by: Peaches on December 18, 2006, 03:23:26 PM
I wish all this legal stuff moved faster.  This poking along just  tries my patience.  

Waving wildly at Mishy!  Hi sweetie!


Title: Lively Case Discussion #561 12/16 - 12/18/2006
Post by: AZLady on December 18, 2006, 03:25:02 PM
I agree, Peaches.  I'm ready for them to get into a courtroom and start testimony--like now, like today!!!   :lol:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #561 12/16 - 12/18/2006
Post by: Kimmy53 on December 18, 2006, 03:26:51 PM
I think the lawsuits have some shaking in their boots... Time will tell who is most concerned (or sweating it!lol)  We will be able to see - Those who protest TOO much.  They do not see how very transparent they are!


Title: Lively Case Discussion #561 12/16 - 12/18/2006
Post by: MsVada on December 18, 2006, 03:28:28 PM
Quote from: "mishy"
Tylergal and MsDarthVada {{{BIG HUGS}}} and prayers for you and yours!!!!!





Thanks Mishy!!


Title: Lively Case Discussion #561 12/16 - 12/18/2006
Post by: AZLady on December 18, 2006, 03:30:42 PM
Quote from: "Kimmy53"
I think the lawsuits have some shaking in their boots... Time will tell who is most concerned (or sweating it!lol)  We will be able to see - Those who protest TOO much.  They do not see how very transparent they are!


So true, Kimmy.  It's just hard to wait!!


Title: Lively Case Discussion #561 12/16 - 12/18/2006
Post by: Anna on December 18, 2006, 03:39:00 PM
Quote from: "msmarple"
O/T - Shout Out to Anna & Other Monkey Panda Fans -

(http://i23.photobucket.com/albums/b367/cli2/HiAnna.gif)

Panda Sneeze! (I do not know which pandas these are; maybe "ours" ??? )

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dtLzvOsQ80k




Oh, that is just too cute!  Does look like Lun Lun but then Pandas tend to all look a great deal alike.  That is a good, loud sneeze for such a little one!  "Ours" is going to be walking any day now and then look out!  She is well ahead of schedule and just the prettiest baby panda ever!


JMO of course.

.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #561 12/16 - 12/18/2006
Post by: Anna on December 18, 2006, 03:42:03 PM
CBB,

If you can get Chattanooga stations, they have Dr Phil at 5 pm EST.


Time for it to air here so going to watch.


.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #561 12/16 - 12/18/2006
Post by: 2NJSons_Mom on December 18, 2006, 03:42:12 PM
Quote from: "klaasend"
Quote from: "Jacqueline"
Quote from: "klaasend"
I want to know WHY after being MIA for approximately 8 months, WONDERWOMAN is suddenly posting again at RU?  Looks like she's despirately trying to place blame on the 2 security guards.  Wonderwoman only starting posting again after the lawsuits were announced.  :?:  :!:


Is that the same WW who used to post here, from Chi Town?


Yes.  I would like to know if she has ties to Posner.  I'd also like to know how "close" she is to Deepak.


I 'wondered' about that web mall link she had in her sig line back then and any connection with MP or otherwise.  Klaasend, I think you confirmed it was no longer available a bit ago.   Lots to wonder about....guess that's an understatement.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #561 12/16 - 12/18/2006
Post by: msmarple on December 18, 2006, 03:42:46 PM
Re. the panda sneeze - for what it's worth, the YouTube date is 10/16/2006. That would be almost 6 weeks if it is ours? (Born 9/6.) Looks about the right size.

Of course, I'm not sure what a date on YouTube means ...


Title: Lively Case Discussion #561 12/16 - 12/18/2006
Post by: 2NJSons_Mom on December 18, 2006, 03:43:20 PM
CR$P....just realized the time....missed most of Dr.Phil.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #561 12/16 - 12/18/2006
Post by: Sue on December 18, 2006, 03:43:36 PM
Debbie at BFN has posted something about Dr Phil show today
But I dont know how to bring that format over to be viewed
Klaas maybe you can help out


Title: Lively Case Discussion #561 12/16 - 12/18/2006
Post by: klaasend on December 18, 2006, 03:56:37 PM
Quote from: "Sue"
Debbie at BFN has posted something about Dr Phil show today
But I dont know how to bring that format over to be viewed
Klaas maybe you can help out

What Debbie posted is availabe at the Dr. Phil site.  I'll post it here too.  San just watched Dr. Phil and said there was nothing new that we didn't already know mentioned on the show.

http://www.drphil.com/shows/show/814/

(http://i18.photobucket.com/albums/b125/Debzie_/misc/drphil2.jpg)
(http://i18.photobucket.com/albums/b125/Debzie_/misc/drphil3.jpg)
(http://i18.photobucket.com/albums/b125/Debzie_/misc/drphil4.jpg)


Title: Lively Case Discussion #561 12/16 - 12/18/2006
Post by: Sue on December 18, 2006, 04:00:29 PM
Well im glad to see or read that Dr. Phil doesnt seemed to be phased
by the lawsuit


Title: Lively Case Discussion #561 12/16 - 12/18/2006
Post by: AZLady on December 18, 2006, 04:02:36 PM
Something like this shouldn't ruffle Dr. Phil's feathers, not with his background.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #561 12/16 - 12/18/2006
Post by: yapperz1 on December 18, 2006, 04:07:04 PM
I seriously doubt Dr Phil is the least be worried over this case.

AZ you have mail. We have 1 day in the same port from the itinerary I saw of your ship.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #561 12/16 - 12/18/2006
Post by: yapperz1 on December 18, 2006, 04:07:54 PM
Quote from: "yapperz1"
I seriously doubt Dr Phil is the least bit worried over this case.

AZ you have mail. We have 1 day in the same port from the itinerary I saw of your ship.


*self edited cause I can't type


Title: Lively Case Discussion #561 12/16 - 12/18/2006
Post by: AZLady on December 18, 2006, 04:13:53 PM
Quote from: "yapperz1"
I seriously doubt Dr Phil is the least be worried over this case.

AZ you have mail. We have 1 day in the same port from the itinerary I saw of your ship.


Actually, we have two days in the same port--Belize and Costa Maya.  They call Costa Maya another name Majahual, but it's Costa Maya.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #561 12/16 - 12/18/2006
Post by: LilPuma on December 18, 2006, 04:14:27 PM
Quote from: "Kimmy53"
I think the lawsuits have some shaking in their boots... Time will tell who is most concerned (or sweating it!lol)  We will be able to see - Those who protest TOO much.  They do not see how very transparent they are!


No doubt.  Was it Espionage who gave us the Dutch term for "bundle of nerves"?  Wonder which one he was referring to.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #561 12/16 - 12/18/2006
Post by: AZLady on December 18, 2006, 04:14:35 PM
Woo hoo!  I might get to meet another Monkey! I'm excited.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #561 12/16 - 12/18/2006
Post by: AZLady on December 18, 2006, 04:15:40 PM
Quote from: "LilPuma"
Quote from: "Kimmy53"
I think the lawsuits have some shaking in their boots... Time will tell who is most concerned (or sweating it!lol)  We will be able to see - Those who protest TOO much.  They do not see how very transparent they are!


No doubt.  Was it Espionage who gave us the Dutch term for "bundle of nerves"?  Wonder which one he was referring to.


I'll bet Paulus and Joran are hiding in their house and afraid of every doorbell ring and phone ring.  Well, they are coming for you, so pack your bags, VDS"s.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #561 12/16 - 12/18/2006
Post by: yapperz1 on December 18, 2006, 04:18:08 PM
Az, Let's hope we can work it out. Look forward to meeting you.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #561 12/16 - 12/18/2006
Post by: AZLady on December 18, 2006, 04:19:48 PM
Quote from: "yapperz1"
Az, Let's hope we can work it out. Look forward to meeting you.


Me, too!


Title: Lively Case Discussion #561 12/16 - 12/18/2006
Post by: cubbeegirl on December 18, 2006, 04:21:11 PM
Quote from: "yapperz1"
Az, Let's hope we can work it out. Look forward to meeting you.




Hey yap! Can I sneak on in some of your lugguage or something? :wink:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #561 12/16 - 12/18/2006
Post by: LilPuma on December 18, 2006, 04:21:36 PM
Quote from: "AZLady"
Quote from: "LilPuma"
Quote from: "Kimmy53"
I think the lawsuits have some shaking in their boots... Time will tell who is most concerned (or sweating it!lol)  We will be able to see - Those who protest TOO much.  They do not see how very transparent they are!


No doubt.  Was it Espionage who gave us the Dutch term for "bundle of nerves"?  Wonder which one he was referring to.


I'll bet Paulus and Joran are hiding in their house and afraid of every doorbell ring and phone ring.  Well, they are coming for you, so pack your bags, VDS"s.


1.  Larry Garrison - someone's talking
2.  Dutch take case files to Holland
3.  DeVries comes out with new incriminating information (not just for America now)
4.  Kalpoes may be going to America and have to answer questions in a public courtroom.   :shock:
5.  J2K and others know Deepak said what he said.  
6.  Whoever altered the tape given to Aruba has their butt on the line
7.  Oh what a tangled web we weave, now Koen and family went across the sea


No smoking gun yet, no 15 years yet, but it's not looking good for them.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #561 12/16 - 12/18/2006
Post by: yapperz1 on December 18, 2006, 04:23:55 PM
Hiya Cubbee...sure climb in the suitcase  LOL

I hope everyone involved is shaking in their shoes!!!!
It is way past time for the truth to have come out.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #561 12/16 - 12/18/2006
Post by: cubbeegirl on December 18, 2006, 04:27:19 PM
Quote from: "yapperz1"
Hiya Cubbee...sure climb in the suitcase  LOL

I hope everyone involved is shaking in their shoes!!!!
It is way past time for the truth to have come out.



I hope so too Yap, Natalee's family deserves to know the truth....

Hello to all the monkeys, I have been in lurk mode reading and trying to catch up whenever I can, have been having house guests who are leaving in the morning and then getting ready for my trip to the great white north....which I hope is white seeing as how I am gonna freeze my butt off when I get there....LOL


Title: Lively Case Discussion #561 12/16 - 12/18/2006
Post by: LilPuma on December 18, 2006, 04:28:46 PM
Please don't make me go back and read this whole thread - Did someone say that the computers of J2K weren't given to NFI but to some other agency or organization?  

I was still sleepy this morning when I was reading.   :oops:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #561 12/16 - 12/18/2006
Post by: robots on December 18, 2006, 04:29:57 PM
Quote from: "LilPuma"
Please don't make me go back and read this whole thread - Did someone say that the computers of J2K weren't given to NFI but to some other agency or organization?  

I was still sleepy this morning when I was reading.   :oops:


little puma needs some coffee ?? 8)  :D  :D  :D  :D


Title: Lively Case Discussion #561 12/16 - 12/18/2006
Post by: Kimmy53 on December 18, 2006, 04:30:49 PM
Does anyone think that Deepak or Satish have some concrete evidence?  I have thought that they have kept something as leverage.  Such as the missing shoe?  IF they are coming here to turn the tables on the VDS's - I hope they have physical evidence that can tie the perps to the crime - not just their word for it.....


Title: Lively Case Discussion #561 12/16 - 12/18/2006
Post by: mishy on December 18, 2006, 04:31:39 PM
Quote from: "Peaches"
I wish all this legal stuff moved faster.  This poking along just  tries my patience.  

Waving wildly at Mishy!  Hi sweetie!


Ola!! (http://i23.photobucket.com/albums/b358/mishyp/bigkisses.gif)


Title: Lively Case Discussion #561 12/16 - 12/18/2006
Post by: mishy on December 18, 2006, 04:35:29 PM
Quote from: "AZLady"
Quote from: "yapperz1"
I seriously doubt Dr Phil is the least be worried over this case.

AZ you have mail. We have 1 day in the same port from the itinerary I saw of your ship.


Actually, we have two days in the same port--Belize and Costa Maya.  They call Costa Maya another name Majahual, but it's Costa Maya.


How exciting, you guys!! That'd be great if ya'll could hook up. Have a great trip!! What a lovely time of the year to be taking that cruise...Be careful!!!!!


Title: Lively Case Discussion #561 12/16 - 12/18/2006
Post by: LilPuma on December 18, 2006, 04:36:56 PM
Quote from: "robots"
Quote from: "LilPuma"
Please don't make me go back and read this whole thread - Did someone say that the computers of J2K weren't given to NFI but to some other agency or organization?  

I was still sleepy this morning when I was reading.   :oops:


little puma needs some coffee ?? 8)  :D  :D  :D  :D


I've had my coffee today.   :)  But I somehow just remembered, vaguely, something I think I read first thing this morning.  About the computers.  They went to some company, not NFI.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #561 12/16 - 12/18/2006
Post by: robots on December 18, 2006, 04:38:15 PM
Quote from: "LilPuma"
Quote from: "robots"
Quote from: "LilPuma"
Please don't make me go back and read this whole thread - Did someone say that the computers of J2K weren't given to NFI but to some other agency or organization?  

I was still sleepy this morning when I was reading.   :oops:


little puma needs some coffee ?? 8)  :D  :D  :D  :D


I've had my coffee today.   :)  But I somehow just remembered, vaguely, something I think I read first thing this morning.  About the computers.  They went to some company, not NFI.


maybe i need coffee..... :shock:

i missed it too...

course i gave up coffee 2 years ago...
and cigs.
miserable ever since  :twisted:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #561 12/16 - 12/18/2006
Post by: AZLady on December 18, 2006, 04:40:10 PM
It does seem like movement is occuring when we see the Dutch take all the case files to Holland, and Koen's family moves to the US.  Then, the Kalpoes apparently voluntarily enter the US justice system by filing against Dr. Phil and being named defendants in the wrongful death suit.  Does it seem to anyone else like the Aruban justice system was just bypassed, kind of a play around the end into the end zone.  Well, not quite into the end zone, yet, but the play is still in progress.   :lol:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #561 12/16 - 12/18/2006
Post by: AZLady on December 18, 2006, 04:42:10 PM
Quote from: "mishy"
Quote from: "AZLady"
Quote from: "yapperz1"
I seriously doubt Dr Phil is the least be worried over this case.

AZ you have mail. We have 1 day in the same port from the itinerary I saw of your ship.


Actually, we have two days in the same port--Belize and Costa Maya.  They call Costa Maya another name Majahual, but it's Costa Maya.


How exciting, you guys!! That'd be great if ya'll could hook up. Have a great trip!! What a lovely time of the year to be taking that cruise...Be careful!!!!!


Thanks, Mishy.  It is a beautiful time to go south.  We'll be careful.  No one would want this cranky old lady, anyway!  I'd be way too much trouble for anyone!   :lol:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #561 12/16 - 12/18/2006
Post by: AZLady on December 18, 2006, 04:43:15 PM
Puma, I thought I read that, too, but can't remember details.  It was just a quick, passing entry and I think even abbreviated the name so it didn't make sense to me.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #561 12/16 - 12/18/2006
Post by: Florida on December 18, 2006, 04:49:52 PM
AZLady and Yappers:

Have youselves a wonderful cruise!

(But, do be careful)


Title: Lively Case Discussion #561 12/16 - 12/18/2006
Post by: bleachedblack on December 18, 2006, 04:56:34 PM
Quote from: "klaasend"
Quote from: "Jacqueline"
Quote from: "klaasend"
I want to know WHY after being MIA for approximately 8 months, WONDERWOMAN is suddenly posting again at RU?  Looks like she's despirately trying to place blame on the 2 security guards.  Wonderwoman only starting posting again after the lawsuits were announced.  :?:  :!:


Is that the same WW who used to post here, from Chi Town?


Yes.  I would like to know if she has ties to Posner.  I'd also like to know how "close" she is to Deepak.


Wonder if she is that Angelina Reppas person?
Sorry....forgot my manners, afternoon Monkeys!


Title: Lively Case Discussion #561 12/16 - 12/18/2006
Post by: AZLady on December 18, 2006, 04:57:06 PM
Okay, some of you east coast Monkeys, what was said on Dr. Phil?  I don't get it until tonight!!   :lol:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #561 12/16 - 12/18/2006
Post by: yapperz1 on December 18, 2006, 04:58:25 PM
Thanks Florida & Mishy.

My hubby says if anyone grabbed me they'd make sure to return me b4 dark & pay him to take me back   :shock:    So I guess cranky doesn't come close to describing me.   :lol:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #561 12/16 - 12/18/2006
Post by: AZLady on December 18, 2006, 04:59:09 PM
Quote from: "bleachedblack"
Quote from: "klaasend"
Quote from: "Jacqueline"
Quote from: "klaasend"
I want to know WHY after being MIA for approximately 8 months, WONDERWOMAN is suddenly posting again at RU?  Looks like she's despirately trying to place blame on the 2 security guards.  Wonderwoman only starting posting again after the lawsuits were announced.  :?:  :!:


Is that the same WW who used to post here, from Chi Town?


Yes.  I would like to know if she has ties to Posner.  I'd also like to know how "close" she is to Deepak.


Wonder if she is that Angelina Reppas person?
Sorry....forgot my manners, afternoon Monkeys!


BB, that was my suspicion, too.  The email she presented to us from Deepak made me think she knew him well.  I just wonder if Angelina, Deepak's "sister," and co-owner of the internet cafe, is WW...


Title: Lively Case Discussion #561 12/16 - 12/18/2006
Post by: klaasend on December 18, 2006, 04:59:56 PM
Quote from: "bleachedblack"
Quote from: "klaasend"
Quote from: "Jacqueline"
Quote from: "klaasend"
I want to know WHY after being MIA for approximately 8 months, WONDERWOMAN is suddenly posting again at RU?  Looks like she's despirately trying to place blame on the 2 security guards.  Wonderwoman only starting posting again after the lawsuits were announced.  :?:  :!:


Is that the same WW who used to post here, from Chi Town?


Yes.  I would like to know if she has ties to Posner.  I'd also like to know how "close" she is to Deepak.


Wonder if she is that Angelina Reppas person?
Sorry....forgot my manners, afternoon Monkeys!

No, she's not Angelina.  I know her real identity and she does live in Chicago as she claims to.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #561 12/16 - 12/18/2006
Post by: AZLady on December 18, 2006, 05:01:56 PM
Well, so much for that idea.   :roll:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #561 12/16 - 12/18/2006
Post by: AZLady on December 18, 2006, 05:02:25 PM
We did have someone from Oranjestad checking in earlier today and reading.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #561 12/16 - 12/18/2006
Post by: klaasend on December 18, 2006, 05:05:06 PM
Quote from: "AZLady"
We did have someone from Oranjestad checking in earlier today and reading.


(http://i37.photobucket.com/albums/e82/klaasend2/JuliaWitch-1.gif)


Title: Lively Case Discussion #561 12/16 - 12/18/2006
Post by: Anna on December 18, 2006, 05:05:34 PM
Quote from: "LilPuma"
Please don't make me go back and read this whole thread - Did someone say that the computers of J2K weren't given to NFI but to some other agency or organization?  

I was still sleepy this morning when I was reading.   :oops:



The only reports I have seen were the ones we have posted here and they were prepared by the Dutch group that is conducting the re-investigation or whatever it is they are doing.  Dutch Rural something that goes by initials?  KPLD or whatever they are known as.

They are not the same as NFI.  There is no NFI emblem or signatory on the report we were given.  If other reports exist, I have not seen them and they have not been released.


Also along those lines, the Office of the Prosecution released a statement on the Deepak/Skeeters tape only.  We never saw any actual NFI report on that one either although apparently it did go to NFI.  At least that is what the O of P said.  

.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #561 12/16 - 12/18/2006
Post by: AZLady on December 18, 2006, 05:06:26 PM
Quote from: "yapperz1"
Thanks Florida & Mishy.

My hubby says if anyone grabbed me they'd make sure to return me b4 dark & pay him to take me back   :shock:    So I guess cranky doesn't come close to describing me.   :lol:


Yapperz, well, we've established that we are not sweet, young, beautiful and desirable, so I think we're safe!   :shock:  :lol:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #561 12/16 - 12/18/2006
Post by: AZLady on December 18, 2006, 05:07:47 PM
Quote from: "klaasend"
Quote from: "AZLady"
We did have someone from Oranjestad checking in earlier today and reading.


(http://i37.photobucket.com/albums/e82/klaasend2/JuliaWitch-1.gif)


Oh my, yes.  She does keep up with our little chats, doesn't she?   :x


Title: Lively Case Discussion #561 12/16 - 12/18/2006
Post by: Leslie on December 18, 2006, 05:13:09 PM
Klaas: Was the letter sent to Paul van der Sloot mailed from Hot Springs, Arkansas?


Title: Lively Case Discussion #561 12/16 - 12/18/2006
Post by: Florida on December 18, 2006, 05:13:32 PM
Quote from: "AZLady"
Okay, some of you east coast Monkeys, what was said on Dr. Phil?  I don't get it until tonight!!   :lol:


I'm confused...as usual
Dr. Phil comes on at 5pm EST here....
Show is not about Natalee  :?

From BFN: Dr. Phil Show
http://blogsfornatalee.com/forums/index.php?topic=5841.msg184614#msg184614


Title: Lively Case Discussion #561 12/16 - 12/18/2006
Post by: AZLady on December 18, 2006, 05:16:25 PM
Quote from: "Florida"
Quote from: "AZLady"
Okay, some of you east coast Monkeys, what was said on Dr. Phil?  I don't get it until tonight!!   :lol:


I'm confused...as usual
Dr. Phil comes on at 5pm EST here....
Show is not about Natalee  :?

From BFN: Dr. Phil Show
http://blogsfornatalee.com/forums/index.php?topic=5841.msg184614#msg184614


Florida, I thought that was taken from the Dr. Phil website.  I haven't read yet what was said on the show today.  Or am I wrong and is this what was said on the show?  TY


Title: Lively Case Discussion #561 12/16 - 12/18/2006
Post by: yapperz1 on December 18, 2006, 05:18:03 PM
Dr Phil is on but Beth hasn't been on yet.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #561 12/16 - 12/18/2006
Post by: AZLady on December 18, 2006, 05:18:54 PM
Quote from: "yapperz1"
Dr Phil is on but Beth hasn't been on yet.


Keep us posted, Yapperz.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #561 12/16 - 12/18/2006
Post by: klaasend on December 18, 2006, 05:21:06 PM
Quote from: "Leslie"
Klaas: Was the letter sent to Paul van der Sloot mailed from Hot Springs, Arkansas?

Definately Arkansas postmark but I'm not sure about Hot Springs.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #561 12/16 - 12/18/2006
Post by: Anna on December 18, 2006, 05:22:37 PM
What is on the website is what was on the program.  That is what was said.  I was glad to hear Dr. Phil say we stand behind the integrity of the tape we presented.  He did not use any qualifiers or appear ambiguous at all.

.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #561 12/16 - 12/18/2006
Post by: AZLady on December 18, 2006, 05:23:54 PM
Quote from: "Anna"
What is on the website is what was on the program.  That is what was said.  I was glad to hear Dr. Phil say we stand behind the integrity of the tape we presented.  He did not use any qualifiers or appear ambiguous at all.

.


Thanks, Anna.  Yes, Dr. Phil's comments are quite specific and he seems to be dedicated to helping Beth, no if's, and's or but's about it.  I like his attitude.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #561 12/16 - 12/18/2006
Post by: AZLady on December 18, 2006, 05:25:05 PM
I have to get some work done around here.  I've been playing on this computer all day.  Christmas vacation is a wonderful concept.  I highly recommend it.  See ya later, Monkeys.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #561 12/16 - 12/18/2006
Post by: mishy on December 18, 2006, 05:25:44 PM
Quote from: "yapperz1"
Thanks Florida & Mishy.

My hubby says if anyone grabbed me they'd make sure to return me b4 dark & pay him to take me back   :shock:    So I guess cranky doesn't come close to describing me.   :lol:


 :lol:   :lol:  :lol:  :lol:  :lol:  :lol:  :lol:  :lol:  :lol:  :lol:  :lol:  :lol:  :lol:

Yeah, you're the biggest hearted "meanie" I know  :wink:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #561 12/16 - 12/18/2006
Post by: klaasend on December 18, 2006, 05:28:37 PM
Dr. Phil show transcribed by HELI at Refugees:
Dr Phil Show Dec 18/06 TRANSCRIPT

Dr Phil Show
December 18, 2006

Transcribed from tv recording

Dr Phil:

The Natalee Holloway case has made worldwide headlines and I have been working diligently with the missing teen's very brace mother, Beth Twitty, to try and find answers. I told her at the time, that I knew the headlines would change and people's attention would move off of this, but my commitment was I would not allow this to get old and cold and would stay the course no matter what obstacles were put in our way.

Take a look at our journey together so far

(plays video clips)

"Natalee Holloway disappeared Monday and missed her flight out of Aruba" -- unknown news source

"Within 6 hours after hearing that Natalee was missing I was headed for Aruba" -- Beth Twitty

"What started as a senior class trip to the island of Aruba has turned into a desparate search for a precious missing teen" -- Dr Phil

"Witnesses say these two brothers and 18 year old Joran van der Sloot were seen leaving the bar with Natalee Holloway" -- Susan Candiotti

"Finally after 10 days the police arrested Deepak and Satish Kalpoe and Joran van der Sloot" -- Beth Twitty

"Do you hold out hope against hope that Natalee will be found alive?" -- Dr Phil

"I don't even go there anymore, I'm just so wanting an answer" -- Beth Twitty

"You need to deal with the fact that Natalee might not come home" -- Dr Phl

"All 3 suspects in the disappearance of Natalee Holloway may be released tomorrow" -- unknown news source

"They asked me when I was leaving Aruba for good. I said I will not be living in Aruba but I will never, ever leave Aruba" -- Beth Twitty

"We need to tell these people we will never set foot on aruban soil again until you stand up and do what you have to do for this young woman. If you're not going to treat americans with dignity and respect, then you're not going to treat 'em at all" -- Dr Phil

"I will be contacting the governors of the other 49 states and urging them to join Alabama in this boycott." -- Governor Riley

"Dr Phil, you've been right along, you knew when it was time to step up for this boycott and you know when it's time to begin another search method for Natalee too." -- Beth Twitty

"Since the last time we were on the Dr Phil Show, I had a chance meeting of an attorney and I sought his help" -- Beth Twitty

**GMAFB video of John Kelly and Beth in his apartment; does that media whore ever go anywhere without a camera in tow?

"When I made my first trip to Aruba, I met with Deputy Chief Dompig and Karin Janssen the prosecutor down there. I spent a lot of time clearing the air" -- John Kelly

"Shortly after, a man by the name of Steve Cohen announced that the suspects would be re-interrogated" -- Beth Twitty

"The Aruba authorities raised expectations with absolutely no results" -- John Kelly

"What wound up happening was the interrogation of the suspects was absolutely nothing" -- Beth Twitty

"The last thing we want to do is be part of the emotional trauma that you've experienced up to this point." -- Steve Cohen

"Each official that has given us that false hope, you know a family doesn't need that, they need facts, they don't need false hopes" Beth Twitty

"This woman is sitting there with her daughter defiled, missing, whatever and she's wanting answers and getting political responses. This woman needs to bury her daughter or find her daughter." -- Dr Phil

(end of video clips)

I sat down recently with Beth again to talk about some very interesting developments in this story.

Beth tell me what's gone on since we talked last.

Beth:

I've really been involved with a foundation that I've established, it's International Safe Travel s Foundation . I've been really busy with messages to highschool and college students and Auburn University is working right now in conjunction with the Foundation in developing a curriculum. We're just delving into the legal and safety issues for persons travelling internationally.

The third thing that has come about is the lawsuit that has been filed.

Dr Phil:

We played footage of an interview with the older Kalpoe brother, Deepak as it was gathered by Jamie Skeeters and they're now contesting what was said and have sued this show and made allegations against me and you of tampering with the tape. How do you feel about the fact that they sued the show over that broadcast that you and I did then?

Beth:

The reason they're doing it is because there have been no repercussions, they've never had to be accountable or responsible for any actions they've taken. No matter what they do, no matter how many lies they generate, they just feel as if there's nothing that's going to happen to them.

Dr Phil

Let's look at the upside of our being sued by these suspects in the case; that has established a jurisdictional right for you to file a lawsuit against them for what?

Beth:

With the wrongful death (**there was a cut in the tape here, whatever Beth said was edited out) that will allow now the attorneys to depose these suspects and see if we can get to the inconsistencies in all of the statements. That's what we've asked for all along , we've just wanted somebody to hold their feet to the fire and get to the bottom of what happened besides all these litany of lies they just continue to generate.

Dr Phil:

When you step back and take a broad view of the fact that we took up Natalee's cause when everybody was thinking this is old and cold and we got sued for out troubles, how does that make you feel about that?

Beth:

Oh gosh Dr Phill, it makes me sick. All that you've tried to do from the beginning is just get to the bottom of it, get the answers

Dr Phil:

We stand by the integrity of that taped interview that was played on the show and we stand by you continuing this investigation to find out what has happened to Natalee.

Beth:

It's certainly not a talk show, it has just been action from you. Everything that you have done has been the right step at the right time and what I needed was what you provided and that's what keeps a path moving towards justice, towards answers.

Dr Phil:

It's frustrating, but here's what we know for sure. We know Natalee disappeared and is still missing, we know that you don't have answers and we know we have an unfettered right to discuss it and talk about it and we're going to continue to talk about it until we get answers and the guilty people are held accountable and we are not going to be intimidated by some ridiculous lawsuit.

Beth:

And I want you Dr Phil, John Kelly and the team that you have, that's who I want to find the answers because the aruban government is not going to do anything.

Dr Phil:

You've got a great lawyer in John Kelly so I know we're all going to continue to stay the course and I'm sorry that we're having to do it but Natalee deserves nothing less.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #561 12/16 - 12/18/2006
Post by: SunnyinTX on December 18, 2006, 05:40:57 PM
Hi Monks. I finally caught up :D ....I am sorry to read of the losses of loved ones and those that are ill.....please get well soon.

AZ - you will love the Grand Princess......email me and perhaps we can set up a meeting...I live in Houston ya know. :D   Put SM in front of my name here and send it to a-o-l  if you don't have my email addy.

The segment on Dr. Phil was short....but I was pleased that he reaffirmed that he/and Co. was with Beth and family.

The tapes on Scrux are the tapes that were doctored...and transcribed by inexperienced people who because they might have transcribed shows from TV suddenly thought they were professional and trained....instead they had a need to be invloved in this case one way or another :wink: And were recuites of renfro...let's not forget that.....roger's tapes were doctored by someone (s) other than Skeeters/dr. Phil etc. . Low anyone with a lick of brains would think that Jamie or Dr. Phil would risk their reputations like that is beyond me. The tape clearly state SHE DID......and I hope to heaven this lawsuit goes forward and brings this out .....the dark side will get even darker :shock:

I am probably talking to myself this time of day......but Hi to all anyway.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #561 12/16 - 12/18/2006
Post by: San on December 18, 2006, 05:44:26 PM
Quote from: "SunnyinTX"
Hi Monks. I finally caught up :D ....I am sorry to read of the losses of loved ones and those that are ill.....please get well soon.

AZ - you will love the Grand Princess......email me and perhaps we can set up a meeting...I live in Houston ya know. :D   Put SM in front of my name here and send it to a-o-l  if you don't have my email addy.

The segment on Dr. Phil was short....but I was pleased that he reaffirmed that he/and Co. was with Beth and family.

The tapes on Scrux are the tapes that were doctored...and transcribed by inexperienced people who because they might have transcribed shows from TV suddenly thought they were professional and trained....instead they had a need to be invloved in this case one way or another :wink: And were recuites of renfro...let's not forget that.....roger's tapes were doctored by someone (s) other than Skeeters/dr. Phil etc. . Low anyone with a lick of brains would think that Jamie or Dr. Phil would risk their reputations like that is beyond me. The tape clearly state SHE DID......and I hope to heaven this lawsuit goes forward and brings this out .....the dark side will get even darker :shock:

I am probably talking to myself this time of day......but Hi to all anyway.

Hi Sunny you are not talking to yourself. :lol:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #561 12/16 - 12/18/2006
Post by: klaasend on December 18, 2006, 05:53:04 PM
I know, pretty silly but I couldn't help myself :lol:  :lol:

(http://i37.photobucket.com/albums/e82/klaasend2/sanyourself.jpg)


Title: Lively Case Discussion #561 12/16 - 12/18/2006
Post by: yapperz1 on December 18, 2006, 05:54:50 PM
Leslie, the letter sent to Pauly Puss is postmarked Little Rock

http://www.scaredmonkeys.net/viewtopic.php?t=212


Title: Lively Case Discussion #561 12/16 - 12/18/2006
Post by: San on December 18, 2006, 05:57:29 PM
Quote from: "klaasend"
I know, pretty silly but I couldn't help myself :lol:  :lol:

(http://i37.photobucket.com/albums/e82/klaasend2/sanyourself.jpg)

 :lol:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #561 12/16 - 12/18/2006
Post by: SunnyinTX on December 18, 2006, 06:05:24 PM
Quote from: "San"
Quote from: "SunnyinTX"
Hi Monks. I finally caught up :D ....I am sorry to read of the losses of loved ones and those that are ill.....please get well soon.

AZ - you will love the Grand Princess......email me and perhaps we can set up a meeting...I live in Houston ya know. :D   Put SM in front of my name here and send it to a-o-l  if you don't have my email addy.

The segment on Dr. Phil was short....but I was pleased that he reaffirmed that he/and Co. was with Beth and family.

The tapes on Scrux are the tapes that were doctored...and transcribed by inexperienced people who because they might have transcribed shows from TV suddenly thought they were professional and trained....instead they had a need to be invloved in this case one way or another :wink: And were recuites of renfro...let's not forget that.....roger's tapes were doctored by someone (s) other than Skeeters/dr. Phil etc. . Low anyone with a lick of brains would think that Jamie or Dr. Phil would risk their reputations like that is beyond me. The tape clearly state SHE DID......and I hope to heaven this lawsuit goes forward and brings this out .....the dark side will get even darker :shock:

I am probably talking to myself this time of day......but Hi to all anyway.

Hi Sunny you are not talking to yourself. :lol:


Hi San...thanks....I get skeered in here alone ya know! :D


Title: Lively Case Discussion #561 12/16 - 12/18/2006
Post by: SunnyinTX on December 18, 2006, 06:07:09 PM
Quote from: "klaasend"
I know, pretty silly but I couldn't help myself :lol:  :lol:

(http://i37.photobucket.com/albums/e82/klaasend2/sanyourself.jpg)


hahahahaha...Klaas you are bad!  LOL

BTW...where in the heck is the Murder and Crime thread?  can you put it as a sticky so it doesn't get lost...cause it's lost I think :oops:  or I am :oops:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #561 12/16 - 12/18/2006
Post by: IndyDan on December 18, 2006, 06:07:17 PM
Quote from: "Sue"
Quote from: "AZLady"
Shout out to Aruba.  Hello there, Oranjestad!  How's it going on the island today?



this is how Aruba is doing.....


(http://i62.photobucket.com/albums/h82/BigMouse1925/tarabeach-1.jpg)


(http://s111.photobucket.com/albums/n151/IndyDan/BoycottArubaPics/boycottmower1.jpg)


Title: Lively Case Discussion #561 12/16 - 12/18/2006
Post by: SunnyinTX on December 18, 2006, 06:07:50 PM
Quote from: "yapperz1"
Leslie, the letter sent to Pauly Puss is postmarked Little Rock

http://www.scaredmonkeys.net/viewtopic.php?t=212


yapperz when is your cruise??


Title: Lively Case Discussion #561 12/16 - 12/18/2006
Post by: klaasend on December 18, 2006, 06:09:29 PM
Quote from: "SunnyinTX"
Quote from: "klaasend"
I know, pretty silly but I couldn't help myself :lol:  :lol:

(http://i37.photobucket.com/albums/e82/klaasend2/sanyourself.jpg)


hahahahaha...Klaas you are bad!  LOL

BTW...where in the heck is the Murder and Crime thread?  can you put it as a sticky so it doesn't get lost...cause it's lost I think :oops:  or I am :oops:

It's in the Important Case Document forum but there's still a mirror thread in this forum.

http://www.scaredmonkeys.net/viewtopic.php?t=188


Title: Lively Case Discussion #561 12/16 - 12/18/2006
Post by: San on December 18, 2006, 06:11:11 PM
Quote from: "SunnyinTX"
Quote from: "San"
Quote from: "SunnyinTX"
Hi Monks. I finally caught up :D ....I am sorry to read of the losses of loved ones and those that are ill.....please get well soon.

AZ - you will love the Grand Princess......email me and perhaps we can set up a meeting...I live in Houston ya know. :D   Put SM in front of my name here and send it to a-o-l  if you don't have my email addy.

The segment on Dr. Phil was short....but I was pleased that he reaffirmed that he/and Co. was with Beth and family.

The tapes on Scrux are the tapes that were doctored...and transcribed by inexperienced people who because they might have transcribed shows from TV suddenly thought they were professional and trained....instead they had a need to be invloved in this case one way or another :wink: And were recuites of renfro...let's not forget that.....roger's tapes were doctored by someone (s) other than Skeeters/dr. Phil etc. . Low anyone with a lick of brains would think that Jamie or Dr. Phil would risk their reputations like that is beyond me. The tape clearly state SHE DID......and I hope to heaven this lawsuit goes forward and brings this out .....the dark side will get even darker :shock:

I am probably talking to myself this time of day......but Hi to all anyway.

Hi Sunny you are not talking to yourself. :lol:


Hi San...thanks....I get skeered in here alone ya know! :D

Don't be skeered I have backup (http://i34.photobucket.com/albums/d118/Sanddrops/gun1.gif)


Title: Lively Case Discussion #561 12/16 - 12/18/2006
Post by: SunnyinTX on December 18, 2006, 06:11:48 PM
Quote from: "klaasend"
Quote from: "SunnyinTX"
Quote from: "klaasend"
I know, pretty silly but I couldn't help myself :lol:  :lol:

(http://i37.photobucket.com/albums/e82/klaasend2/sanyourself.jpg)


hahahahaha...Klaas you are bad!  LOL

BTW...where in the heck is the Murder and Crime thread?  can you put it as a sticky so it doesn't get lost...cause it's lost I think :oops:  or I am :oops:

It's in the Important Case Document forum but there's still a mirror thread in this forum.

http://www.scaredmonkeys.net/viewtopic.php?t=188


thanks Klass....I am found again thanks to you!  LOL :D


Title: Lively Case Discussion #561 12/16 - 12/18/2006
Post by: sb on December 18, 2006, 06:13:13 PM
Quote from: "Tamikosmom"
I cannot fathom why the Kalpoes' "team" of attorneys did not anticipate the wrongful death suit being put into place once jurisdiction was established.

This detective wannabe adheres to a theory that the two lawsuits are all part of a master plan in order for the pieces of the puzzle to fit.

I speculate that John Q. Kelly and the Kalpoe's "team of attorneys" have collaborated and ..... put this entire chain of events into play.

A plea deal has been established with Deepak and Satish which will allow them them the protection in the US from the "powers that be" in Aruba in exchange for their testimony that will expose the truth regarding the answers that the family is seeking.

Think about it .... Who are paying this team of attorneys .... certainly not the "powers that be" in Aruba. The ATA must be freaking out. Those involved in the coverup must be freaking out. Those who participated in the events that encompass the morning that Natalee Holloway went missing must be freaking out.

I speculate that this is soooo much bigger than the Kalpoes launching a lawsuit against Dr. Phil .... a lawsuit they know darn well they cannot win.

Janet


...............................

Greta

Did their american lawyers ever think perhaps if they filed this, that you were going to do exactly what you've done and now open their two clients up to depositions, interrogatories, requests for admissions, all these sorts of things which are the last things in the world that I suspect these two truly want to sit and answer.

JQK

You know I have to think that at some point it may have crossed their minds, it was a calculated risk the took wondering if we'd respond with a third party action related case.


I would have LOVED to see the look on JQK's face when he said that. I suspect it was his usual Cheshire Cat pie-eating smirk, with a wink and a nod. His "I've-got-a-secret" look. LOL.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #561 12/16 - 12/18/2006
Post by: yapperz1 on December 18, 2006, 06:13:40 PM
Quote from: "SunnyinTX"
Quote from: "yapperz1"
Leslie, the letter sent to Pauly Puss is postmarked Little Rock

http://www.scaredmonkeys.net/viewtopic.php?t=212


yapperz when is your cruise??


We leave the 23rd & return the 30th of December out of Tampa


Title: Lively Case Discussion #561 12/16 - 12/18/2006
Post by: sb on December 18, 2006, 06:15:43 PM
I'm just now getting to the theories about JQK's master plan with the Kalpoes and I haven't read it all... but so far, I agree in general terms.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #561 12/16 - 12/18/2006
Post by: Sue on December 18, 2006, 06:18:51 PM
UPS delivered Today    Hope I dont blow the margin

(http://i62.photobucket.com/albums/h82/BigMouse1925/Picture007.jpg)


Title: Lively Case Discussion #561 12/16 - 12/18/2006
Post by: SunnyinTX on December 18, 2006, 06:22:04 PM
Quote from: "San"

Hi Sunny you are not talking to yourself. :lol:


Hi San...thanks....I get skeered in here alone ya know! :D[/quote]
Don't be skeered I have backup (http://i34.photobucket.com/albums/d118/Sanddrops/gun1.gif)[/quote]

LOL....I feel safe now!  LOL


Title: Lively Case Discussion #561 12/16 - 12/18/2006
Post by: SunnyinTX on December 18, 2006, 06:24:00 PM
Quote from: "sb"


JQK

You know I have to think that at some point it may have crossed their minds, it was a calculated risk the took wondering if we'd respond with a third party action related case.


I would have LOVED to see the look on JQK's face when he said that. I suspect it was his usual Cheshire Cat pie-eating smirk, with a wink and a nod. His "I've-got-a-secret" look. LOL.[/quote]

sb you got it exactly!!! :D


Title: Lively Case Discussion #561 12/16 - 12/18/2006
Post by: SunnyinTX on December 18, 2006, 06:24:53 PM
Quote from: "yapperz1"
Quote from: "SunnyinTX"
Quote from: "yapperz1"
Leslie, the letter sent to Pauly Puss is postmarked Little Rock

http://www.scaredmonkeys.net/viewtopic.php?t=212


yapperz when is your cruise??


We leave the 23rd & return the 30th of December out of Tampa


Eastern or Western?  No matter....it will be a great cruise....wish we were going with ya!


Title: Lively Case Discussion #561 12/16 - 12/18/2006
Post by: SunnyinTX on December 18, 2006, 06:25:52 PM
Quote from: "Sue"
UPS delivered Today    Hope I dont blow the margin

(http://i62.photobucket.com/albums/h82/BigMouse1925/Picture007.jpg)


that is so adorable!  Mine would have it off in 10 seconds!  LOL


Title: Lively Case Discussion #561 12/16 - 12/18/2006
Post by: Sue on December 18, 2006, 06:27:30 PM

well the lighter of the 2 put up a fight for me putting it on he was :x  at me


Title: Lively Case Discussion #561 12/16 - 12/18/2006
Post by: SunnyinTX on December 18, 2006, 06:29:55 PM
Quote from: "Sue"

well the lighter of the 2 put up a fight for me putting it on he was :x  at me


hahahahaha....I'd have to get mine down and try to hold them to get anything on them.....Christmas is always a hoot.....I try to get pictures of them in reindeer ears!  LOL


Title: Lively Case Discussion #561 12/16 - 12/18/2006
Post by: Sue on December 18, 2006, 06:31:03 PM

well i couldnt resist them sporting Scared MOnkey Gear  :lol:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #561 12/16 - 12/18/2006
Post by: klaasend on December 18, 2006, 06:34:33 PM
Quote from: "Sue"

well i couldnt resist them sporting Scared MOnkey Gear  :lol:

Sue - how cute!  How does the picture look on the fabric in person?  Can you make out the different avatars ok?  It's always a problem cause you never know until you actually see one in person.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #561 12/16 - 12/18/2006
Post by: yapperz1 on December 18, 2006, 06:40:47 PM
Sunny, we are taking the western leg. Did the eastern in March.
I don't care where we go as long as it isn't Aruba.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #561 12/16 - 12/18/2006
Post by: Sue on December 18, 2006, 06:41:28 PM

Klaas they look great, I ordered Hoodie and long sleeve shirt and mug
they all look really good the mug is fantastic Im sending it to my daughter in kuwait
I got the best the hoodie and I see my little bassett avatar great
everything else looks good..
Now i realise how porky my bassetts are now that they have clothes on :oops:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #561 12/16 - 12/18/2006
Post by: klaasend on December 18, 2006, 06:44:15 PM
Quote from: "Sue"

Klaas they look great, I ordered Hoodie and long sleeve shirt and mug
they all look really good the mug is fantastic Im sending it to my daughter in kuwait
I got the best the hoodie and I see my little bassett avatar great
everything else looks good..
Now i realise how porky my bassetts are now that they have clothes on :oops:

Do the dog shirts come is different sizes?  Glad to hear everything looks good!


Title: Lively Case Discussion #561 12/16 - 12/18/2006
Post by: Sue on December 18, 2006, 06:44:23 PM
If you could Klass would be great if you could add
a hoodie to the scared monkey gear I would order one


Title: Lively Case Discussion #561 12/16 - 12/18/2006
Post by: sb on December 18, 2006, 06:44:42 PM
The thing is, I just am not sure the K2 are SMART enough to cut a deal with JQK and our authorities. Plus, I am afraid that they would know they are COOKED on Aruba if they dared do such a thing. They would surely place themselves in danger unless our people planned this out very, very carefully.

I want to think that JQK has this all laid out. I SO MUCH want to think so.

One thing, however... it implies contact with K2, through channels at the very least. If K2 have been in communications with JQK...

HE AND THE H-T FAMILY HAVE LIKELY HEARD DETAILS ALREADY THAT HAVE GIVEN THEM ANSWERS TO SOME DEGREE AS TO WHAT HAPPENED.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #561 12/16 - 12/18/2006
Post by: Sue on December 18, 2006, 06:45:25 PM
Quote from: "klaasend"
Quote from: "Sue"

Klaas they look great, I ordered Hoodie and long sleeve shirt and mug
they all look really good the mug is fantastic Im sending it to my daughter in kuwait
I got the best the hoodie and I see my little bassett avatar great
everything else looks good..
Now i realise how porky my bassetts are now that they have clothes on :oops:

Do the dog shirts come is different sizes?  Glad to hear everything looks good!


yes they do and i ordered according to measurement I just have fat ass
dogs  :lol:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #561 12/16 - 12/18/2006
Post by: klaasend on December 18, 2006, 06:48:02 PM
Quote from: "Sue"
If you could Klass would be great if you could add
a hoodie to the scared monkey gear I would order one

I thought there already was one..hold on.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #561 12/16 - 12/18/2006
Post by: Sue on December 18, 2006, 06:48:32 PM
cafe press needs turtle gear i think my pet turtle is feeling left out :cry:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #561 12/16 - 12/18/2006
Post by: Sue on December 18, 2006, 06:49:56 PM
Quote from: "klaasend"
Quote from: "Sue"
If you could Klass would be great if you could add
a hoodie to the scared monkey gear I would order one

I thought there already was one..hold on.


not the ones with scared monkeys logo's


Title: Lively Case Discussion #561 12/16 - 12/18/2006
Post by: robots on December 18, 2006, 06:57:02 PM
Quote from: "Sue"
cafe press needs turtle gear i think my pet turtle is feeling left out :cry:




 8)  :lol:  :lol:  :lol:  :lol:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #561 12/16 - 12/18/2006
Post by: Sue on December 18, 2006, 06:58:11 PM
Quote from: "robots"
Quote from: "Sue"
cafe press needs turtle gear i think my pet turtle is feeling left out :cry:




 8)  :lol:  :lol:  :lol:  :lol:


I have the most adorable turtle i could put a scared monkeys sticker on him  :wink:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #561 12/16 - 12/18/2006
Post by: robots on December 18, 2006, 07:00:31 PM
Quote from: "Sue"
Quote from: "robots"
Quote from: "Sue"
cafe press needs turtle gear i think my pet turtle is feeling left out :cry:




 8)  :lol:  :lol:  :lol:  :lol:


I have the most adorable turtle i could put a scared monkeys sticker on him  :wink:



ROFL


Title: Lively Case Discussion #561 12/16 - 12/18/2006
Post by: klaasend on December 18, 2006, 07:02:05 PM
There are 2 hooded sweatshirts

Mens sizes

(http://images.cafepress.com/product/95678028v1_240x240_Front.jpg)

Jr womens

(http://images.cafepress.com/product/95678031v1_240x240_Front.jpg)

I just added also the Teddy Bear

(http://images.cafepress.com/product/95678050v1_240x240_Front.jpg)


Title: Lively Case Discussion #561 12/16 - 12/18/2006
Post by: Sue on December 18, 2006, 07:05:08 PM
Quote from: "klaasend"
There are 2 hooded sweatshirts

Mens sizes

(http://images.cafepress.com/product/95678028v1_240x240_Front.jpg)

Jr womens

(http://images.cafepress.com/product/95678031v1_240x240_Front.jpg)

I just added also the Teddy Bear

(http://images.cafepress.com/product/95678050v1_240x240_Front.jpg)


IM talking about the ones with the SCARED MONKEYS logo..  with the 4 monkeys from dusk to dawn


Title: Lively Case Discussion #561 12/16 - 12/18/2006
Post by: klaasend on December 18, 2006, 07:06:00 PM
Ah...hold on, let me make sure I have the right one and I'll set it up.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #561 12/16 - 12/18/2006
Post by: Sam on December 18, 2006, 07:17:58 PM
Hi Monkeys,

Glad we have protection in here from San. LOL
San the pictures in the lounge are great. I especially liked the ones of St. Pats. I love churches of all kinds. Protestant, Catholic, Synagogues and Mosques. I always have.

Klaas the teddy bear is adorable.

Off topic again. To all who have lost lost friends and loved ones recently, I continue to keep you in my prayers. One of my nephews died of carbon monoxide poisoning in 1987 a few days before Christmas. Faulty gas furnace. 27 years old . My brother and his wife still grieve.

I have read on the Aol news that there have been 10 deaths from this in recent days in Washington State as well as 100 sick from it. If I remember correctly they were due to kerosene heaters and the gasoline powered generators. Oh some of these were in Oregon as well. I hope all of our Monkeys in those areas are ok.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #561 12/16 - 12/18/2006
Post by: klaasend on December 18, 2006, 07:20:52 PM
(http://i37.photobucket.com/albums/e82/klaasend2/threadlock.jpg)


Title: Lively Case Discussion #561 12/16 - 12/18/2006
Post by: klaasend on December 18, 2006, 07:21:34 PM
Sue - check now


Title: Lively Case Discussion #561 12/16 - 12/18/2006
Post by: Sue on December 18, 2006, 07:23:08 PM
Quote from: "Sam"
Hi Monkeys,

Glad we have protection in here from San. LOL
San the pictures in the lounge are great. I especially liked the ones of St. Pats. I love churches of all kinds. Protestant, Catholic, Synagogues and Mosques. I always have.

Klaas the teddy bear is adorable.

Off topic again. To all who have lost lost friends and loved ones recently, I continue to keep you in my prayers. One of my nephews died of carbon monoxide poisoning in 1987 a few days before Christmas. Faulty gas furnace. 27 years old . My brother and his wife still grieve.

I have read on the Aol news that there have been 10 deaths from this in recent days in Washington State as well as 100 sick from it. If I remember correctly they were due to kerosene heaters and the gasoline powered generators. Oh some of these were in Oregon as well. I hope all of our Monkeys in those areas are ok.


Yes Sam Washington is going through some tough times right now, many still without power, heat and the things we take for granite..My family was quite lucky we only lost power for 4 hours and our phone and internet servise for 3 days.. the situation on Mt Hood is just horrible. when those climber left out on there trip probably never imagined that the storm that hit the northwest would be so severe.. we hold these families and climbers
in our prayers and pray for closure and recovery if the other 2 climbers are dead on the mountain..


Title: Lively Case Discussion #561 12/16 - 12/18/2006
Post by: Sue on December 18, 2006, 07:27:46 PM
Quote from: "klaasend"
Sue - check now


YAY thanks I will order one.. I live in hoodies in winter I freeze at work


Title: Lively Case Discussion #561 12/16 - 12/18/2006
Post by: crazybabyborg on December 18, 2006, 07:29:37 PM
Hey Guys! I'm going back to catch up, but wanted to leave this for Kimmy, if she wants it and is here.

(http://i25.photobucket.com/albums/c100/crazybabyborgs/Kimmycopy.jpg)

I missed Dr. Phil, but saw the pics of Beth on the show. She looks very good!


Title: Lively Case Discussion #561 12/16 - 12/18/2006
Post by: klaasend on December 18, 2006, 07:33:44 PM
Quote from: "crazybabyborg"
Hey Guys! I'm going back to catch up, but wanted to leave this for Kimmy, if she wants it and is here.

(http://i25.photobucket.com/albums/c100/crazybabyborgs/Kimmycopy.jpg)

I missed Dr. Phil, but saw the pics of Beth on the show. She looks very good!


CBB - that's adorable!


Title: Lively Case Discussion #561 12/16 - 12/18/2006
Post by: Leslie on December 18, 2006, 07:35:23 PM
Thanks Klaas and Yapperz:
I was on the ISA Aruba website and noticed there are two teachers who are husband and wife and from Arkansas.   I wonder if they visited Arkansas during the summer of 2005?  Brad Neidecker and Glenda Porter-Neidecker.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #561 12/16 - 12/18/2006
Post by: klaasend on December 18, 2006, 07:41:36 PM
Quote from: "Leslie"
Thanks Klaas and Yapperz:
I was on the ISA Aruba website and noticed there are two teachers who are husband and wife and from Arkansas.   I wonder if they visited Arkansas during the summer of 2005?  Brad Neidecker and Glenda Porter-Neidecker.


Hmmm, I wonder too!


Title: Lively Case Discussion #561 12/16 - 12/18/2006
Post by: crazybabyborg on December 18, 2006, 07:43:18 PM
Quote from: "klaasend"
Quote from: "crazybabyborg"
Hey Guys! I'm going back to catch up, but wanted to leave this for Kimmy, if she wants it and is here.

(http://i25.photobucket.com/albums/c100/crazybabyborgs/Kimmycopy.jpg)
http://i25.photobucket.com/albums/c100/crazybabyborgs/Kimmycopy.jpg

I missed Dr. Phil, but saw the pics of Beth on the show. She looks very good!


CBB - that's adorable!


From you, that's high praise!  :wink:
I think this is some psycho mumbo jumbo going on. I have such a diminishing family, and not many opportunities within it to "give" at Christmas, so I have this compulsion to make sure every monkey has the opportunity to have a Christmas avatar!  :lol:  It's fine if they don't want one or don't like it, but I don't want anybody to feel left out!
Thanks for the indulgence of a crazy person!  :wink:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #561 12/16 - 12/18/2006
Post by: SunnyinTX on December 18, 2006, 07:43:33 PM
Quote from: "yapperz1"
Sunny, we are taking the western leg. Did the eastern in March.
I don't care where we go as long as it isn't Aruba.

amen!!  the only bad cruise is the one I am not on :wink: have  terrific time


Title: Lively Case Discussion #561 12/16 - 12/18/2006
Post by: Sam on December 18, 2006, 07:56:11 PM
Quote from: "crazybabyborg"


From you, that's high praise!  :wink:
I think this is some psycho mumbo jumbo going on. I have such a diminishing family, and not many opportunities within it to "give" at Christmas, so I have this compulsion to make sure every monkey has the opportunity to have a Christmas avatar!  :lol:  It's fine if they don't want one or don't like it, but I don't want anybody to feel left out!
Thanks for the indulgence of a crazy person!  :wink:


I bet Kimmy will love it. I love mine. If your generosity is crazy then we need more crazy folks in this world. JMHO

Klaas , I just ordered the teddy bear with the TShirt. After you posted that I went to the site to see it and it was not there, came back to here and then checked again and it was there the second time. Not a Christmas gift, just for me so I went with standard shipping.

It is so sad this is the second Christmas Natalee has been missing. We all want answers.

Sue glad you and yours are ok. I also pray for the families of the climbers as well as answers for them.


Title: Christmass tree things
Post by: IBE on December 18, 2006, 08:02:49 PM
Dearest Monkeys,

I am soooo happy... the items from Cafe Press arr. today.

Klass, and Monkeys, the graphics are great. Very clear on the Tshirt. I can pick out over avatar and seem I know all of you!

On the stein, of course the graphics are smaller, but still can tell each one (need glasses, but that's because of age! and the laptop)

Am getting on the T-shirt with a coat... it's not warm in S. Cal and going to our local American Legion Post to SHOW OFF.  They have heard about the Natalee case from me for over a year!

Taco cassole, salad etc for $3 and great cokes, sweet like the ones in the 50's

If you haven't ordered yet or are stuck on what to get for someone, I'd recommend the Scared Monkeys items and clicking to amazon.com from the SM pages to help SM

In our own little way, we all help SM and of course Natalee.

Have to go before the food runs out for Vets sure fill their plated and deservedly so.

Bye

IBE

Think I'll take my stein for the coke!


Title: Lively Case Discussion #561 12/16 - 12/18/2006
Post by: crazybabyborg on December 18, 2006, 08:03:17 PM
(http://i25.photobucket.com/albums/c100/crazybabyborgs/SBcopy.jpg)
http://i25.photobucket.com/albums/c100/crazybabyborgs/SBcopy.jpg

I'm not sure SB wanted this avatar; that's perfectly alright, SB! It's here if you do, and Merry Christmas!  :wink:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #561 12/16 - 12/18/2006
Post by: IBE on December 18, 2006, 08:04:48 PM
Opps

"over" I mean "every" avatar.

A duh moment


Title: Lively Case Discussion #561 12/16 - 12/18/2006
Post by: Sam on December 18, 2006, 08:05:11 PM
Quote from: "klaasend"
Quote from: "Leslie"
Thanks Klaas and Yapperz:
I was on the ISA Aruba website and noticed there are two teachers who are husband and wife and from Arkansas.   I wonder if they visited Arkansas during the summer of 2005?  Brad Neidecker and Glenda Porter-Neidecker.


Hmmm, I wonder too!


Hmmm, You know even though we have heard that name Glenda before I do not think Glenda is a common name anymore. Klaas or other Monkeys do you suppose this is the RU Glenda????


Title: Wow a teddy bear
Post by: IBE on December 18, 2006, 08:09:04 PM
Wow a teddy bear... can't wait to get back!  Great for the adopted-by-love grandchildren or better yet, I'd like one.

Nonsuche and other good Monkeys
... I'd like to see your businesses and buy from you online. Maybe consider Cafe Press or other ways for us to contact you, after the Christmas rush is over.

"Dying" for a cookie and not the computer kind! Got enough of those


Title: Lively Case Discussion #561 12/16 - 12/18/2006
Post by: crazybabyborg on December 18, 2006, 08:11:58 PM
I only have the name "Florida" to go on, so..........

(http://i25.photobucket.com/albums/c100/crazybabyborgs/PalmTreeChristmas.jpg)
http://i25.photobucket.com/albums/c100/crazybabyborgs/PalmTreeChristmas.jpg


Is there any case coverage tonight that anyone knows of?

I miss Mrs. Red! Have I just missed her, or is she away?


Title: Lively Case Discussion #561 12/16 - 12/18/2006
Post by: Sam on December 18, 2006, 08:14:59 PM
Quote from: "IBE"
Opps

"over" I mean "every" avatar.

A duh moment


IBE,
I have had alot of those duh moments lately. By the way Klaas used my old avatar on the tree. I think it is somewhere low down and is a cigarette smoking male monkey in a yellow vest as I remember. I like my new one much better.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #561 12/16 - 12/18/2006
Post by: justinsmama on December 18, 2006, 08:35:57 PM
Evening, monkeys! I've not read back and y'all have probably already talked about the Dr. Phil show that aired today. It was great! Just had to put my two cents in!


Title: Lively Case Discussion #561 12/16 - 12/18/2006
Post by: IndyDan on December 18, 2006, 08:36:56 PM
The Dr Phil suit is another nail in the coffin for Aruba.  I'm just not ready to jump on the Phil bandwagon yet, he hasn't convinced me his mission is to help the family bring these criminals to justice.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #561 12/16 - 12/18/2006
Post by: Sue on December 18, 2006, 08:37:43 PM
Quote from: "IBE"
Opps

"over" I mean "every" avatar.

A duh moment


IBE you need to go back a few pages see my doggies sporting there
scared monkeys christmas wear that i recieved today
BTW got my sweat shirt on it is very good quality and so nice and warm


Title: Lively Case Discussion #561 12/16 - 12/18/2006
Post by: bleachedblack on December 18, 2006, 08:50:09 PM
Quote from: "AZLady"
Quote from: "bleachedblack"
Quote from: "klaasend"
Quote from: "Jacqueline"
Quote from: "klaasend"
I want to know WHY after being MIA for approximately 8 months, WONDERWOMAN is suddenly posting again at RU?  Looks like she's despirately trying to place blame on the 2 security guards.  Wonderwoman only starting posting again after the lawsuits were announced.  :?:  :!:


Is that the same WW who used to post here, from Chi Town?


Yes.  I would like to know if she has ties to Posner.  I'd also like to know how "close" she is to Deepak.


Wonder if she is that Angelina Reppas person?
Sorry....forgot my manners, afternoon Monkeys!


Sorry for the late reply had to go out.....but am now reading to catch up....
It seems it would may sense for WW to be someone who has access to computers(s) , which Angelina would. I mean it could very well be a number of people but she has come to mind in the past.

BB, that was my suspicion, too.  The email she presented to us from Deepak made me think she knew him well.  I just wonder if Angelina, Deepak's "sister," and co-owner of the internet cafe, is WW...


Title: Lively Case Discussion #561 12/16 - 12/18/2006
Post by: IndyDan on December 18, 2006, 08:50:33 PM
I did not like the question Phil asked Beth: " How does it make you feel that we're being sued because of our pursuit to bring justice for Natalee" <Not the exact words but the way I heard them>.

Dr Phil can be a great asset and he did promise Beth he'd commit all his energy resources to finding justice for Natalee, but it took a lawsuit to get him to address the case again after he made that promise to her almost a year ago on Natl TV.

At this time I have more hope in the DeVries investigation.  Phil hasn't showed me he's doing anything proactive but rather responding reactively.

His show today, was just a "how great you are Dr Phil" show. Beth was slotted in at the 30 minute mark for maybe 5 minutes.  The rest of the show was a tribute to Phil.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #561 12/16 - 12/18/2006
Post by: klaasend on December 18, 2006, 08:50:42 PM
Posted by BUBBLES at Refugees.  Obviously Bubbles isn't familiar with the wide variety of ethinic backgrounds representing the Los Angeles County jury pool area:

A downtown Los Angeles jury is not going to take kindly to a southern nutcase attacking 2 young boys of color with no evidence whatsoever. Twit chose the wrong city for her lawsuit. It didn't fly in NY and will not fly in CA.



Note to Bubbles  :wink:  Please look at this map.  Beverly Hills is approximately 13 miles from the courthouse.  You will find a diverse jury pool of low to very high income levels.

(http://i37.photobucket.com/albums/e82/klaasend2/LASuperiorCourt.jpg)


Title: Lively Case Discussion #561 12/16 - 12/18/2006
Post by: bleachedblack on December 18, 2006, 08:51:43 PM
Quote from: "klaasend"
Quote from: "bleachedblack"
Quote from: "klaasend"
Quote from: "Jacqueline"
Quote from: "klaasend"
I want to know WHY after being MIA for approximately 8 months, WONDERWOMAN is suddenly posting again at RU?  Looks like she's despirately trying to place blame on the 2 security guards.  Wonderwoman only starting posting again after the lawsuits were announced.  :?:  :!:


Is that the same WW who used to post here, from Chi Town?


Yes.  I would like to know if she has ties to Posner.  I'd also like to know how "close" she is to Deepak.


Wonder if she is that Angelina Reppas person?
Sorry....forgot my manners, afternoon Monkeys!

No, she's not Angelina.  I know her real identity and she does live in Chicago as she claims to.


Chicago? well then is she related to someone from aruba and india?


Title: Lively Case Discussion #561 12/16 - 12/18/2006
Post by: crazybabyborg on December 18, 2006, 08:52:22 PM
Quote from: "IndyDan"
The Dr Phil suit is another nail in the coffin for Aruba.  I'm just not ready to jump on the Phil bandwagon yet, he hasn't convinced me his mission is to help the family bring these criminals to justice.


I've wondered that, but his objectives coincide with Beth's, whatever the motivations are, so I try to just be grateful. Actually, his comments today were reassuring to me. He pointed to Beth's involvement on the show when the tape was aired, and making that connection goes to the relationship of her case to the suit.
K2s filing mentions the "defamatory" nature of the tape AND Beth's comments on the show. Slander is part of the suit and in order to prove slander you MUST show that the information you imparted is FALSE.
Beth's case claims wrongful death and by all rights she should have been named in thier suit: that's exactly where Beth wants to be. She would be able to depose them for sure about the circumstances.  I think they left her out to avoid deposition about the details of Natalee's disappearance. The close connection, which Dr. Phil reinforced today, could be helpful to her and her case, IMO.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #561 12/16 - 12/18/2006
Post by: Elaine on December 18, 2006, 08:52:32 PM
Hello Monkeys! Sue, your dogs look so cute in the scared monkey shirts! Ibe, I am glad you got your things! I haven't received mine yet... I ordered it on the 10th, BUT I didn't get the fast delivery, dang it, I wish I had.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #561 12/16 - 12/18/2006
Post by: justinsmama on December 18, 2006, 08:53:35 PM
Quote from: "Sue"
UPS delivered Today    Hope I dont blow the margin

(http://i62.photobucket.com/albums/h82/BigMouse1925/Picture007.jpg)



(http://www.smileyhut.com/laughing/roflmao3.gif)(http://www.smileyhut.com/laughing/roflmao3.gif)(http://www.smileyhut.com/laughing/roflmao3.gif)(http://www.smileyhut.com/laughing/roflmao3.gif)(http://www.smileyhut.com/laughing/roflmao3.gif)(http://www.smileyhut.com/laughing/roflmao3.gif)


Title: Lively Case Discussion #561 12/16 - 12/18/2006
Post by: Sue on December 18, 2006, 08:54:44 PM
Quote from: "klaasend"
Posted by BUBBLES at Refugees.  Obviously Bubbles isn't familiar with the wide variety of ethinic backgrounds representing the Los Angeles County jury pool area:

A downtown Los Angeles jury is not going to take kindly to a southern nutcase attacking 2 young boys of color with no evidence whatsoever. Twit chose the wrong city for her lawsuit. It didn't fly in NY and will not fly in CA.



Note to Bubbles  :wink:  Please look at this map.  Beverly Hills is approximately 13 miles from the courthouse.  You will find a diverse jury pool of low to very high income levels.

(http://i37.photobucket.com/albums/e82/klaasend2/LASuperiorCourt.jpg)



I wonder if she said that about OJ , Oooops that right JQK  kicked his ass in a civil case :D


Title: Lively Case Discussion #561 12/16 - 12/18/2006
Post by: bleachedblack on December 18, 2006, 08:55:42 PM
Quote from: "crazybabyborg"
Hey Guys! I'm going back to catch up, but wanted to leave this for Kimmy, if she wants it and is here.

(http://i25.photobucket.com/albums/c100/crazybabyborgs/Kimmycopy.jpg)

I missed Dr. Phil, but saw the pics of Beth on the show. She looks very good!


CBB that avatar is adorable....


Title: Lively Case Discussion #561 12/16 - 12/18/2006
Post by: Florida on December 18, 2006, 08:55:52 PM
If anyone has a handy "Who's Who from RU"

I'd appreciate it.....Never paid much attention...
As I believe they are all FOS.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #561 12/16 - 12/18/2006
Post by: robots on December 18, 2006, 08:56:57 PM
Quote from: "Sue"
Quote from: "klaasend"
Posted by BUBBLES at Refugees.  Obviously Bubbles isn't familiar with the wide variety of ethinic backgrounds representing the Los Angeles County jury pool area:

A downtown Los Angeles jury is not going to take kindly to a southern nutcase attacking 2 young boys of color with no evidence whatsoever. Twit chose the wrong city for her lawsuit. It didn't fly in NY and will not fly in CA.



Note to Bubbles  :wink:  Please look at this map.  Beverly Hills is approximately 13 miles from the courthouse.  You will find a diverse jury pool of low to very high income levels.

(http://i37.photobucket.com/albums/e82/klaasend2/LASuperiorCourt.jpg)



I wonder if she said that about OJ , Oooops that right JQK  kicked his ass in a civil case :D


JQK will do several BODY SLAMS against the WEAK BASTARDS

i hate em all


Title: Lively Case Discussion #561 12/16 - 12/18/2006
Post by: robots on December 18, 2006, 08:57:51 PM
Quote from: "Florida"
If anyone has a handy "Who's Who from RU"

I'd appreciate it.....Never paid much attention...
As I believe they are all FOS.



cant help ya there

consider yourself lucky,,, to not have paid attention  8)


Title: Lively Case Discussion #561 12/16 - 12/18/2006
Post by: Florida on December 18, 2006, 08:57:53 PM
Quote from: "crazybabyborg"
I only have the name "Florida" to go on, so..........


Hi...Is this a reference to ME?


Title: Lively Case Discussion #561 12/16 - 12/18/2006
Post by: Sue on December 18, 2006, 08:57:56 PM

Robot...... I hate them also


Title: Lively Case Discussion #561 12/16 - 12/18/2006
Post by: Cat on December 18, 2006, 08:58:29 PM
I think my question wasn't completely clear,earlier.In the old days several mob families existed side by side.I think aruba might have several families,like posner(money,etc,),groups including the dutch(for X and opiates)and the south americans(for cocaine).General scams could be run by any and all.I was wondering if th k2's are a part(with the step father)a part of a group seperate of the dutchies.Porn is more dutch than Columbian.Just a random thought from a disorganized brain.I am strang monkey/cat


Title: Lively Case Discussion #561 12/16 - 12/18/2006
Post by: crazybabyborg on December 18, 2006, 08:59:27 PM
Quote from: "klaasend"
Posted by BUBBLES at Refugees.  Obviously Bubbles isn't familiar with the wide variety of ethinic backgrounds representing the Los Angeles County jury pool area:

A downtown Los Angeles jury is not going to take kindly to a southern nutcase attacking 2 young boys of color with no evidence whatsoever. Twit chose the wrong city for her lawsuit. It didn't fly in NY and will not fly in CA.



Note to Bubbles  :wink:  Please look at this map.  Beverly Hills is approximately 13 miles from the courthouse.  You will find a diverse jury pool of low to very high income levels.

(http://i37.photobucket.com/albums/e82/klaasend2/LASuperiorCourt.jpg)


She didn't choose the city, K2's lawyers did. I think that many people "of color" have children as do people of what ..........."colorless?" and if so, they have a point of relativity. Sorry to burst you, Bubbles.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #561 12/16 - 12/18/2006
Post by: bleachedblack on December 18, 2006, 08:59:42 PM
Quote from: "IndyDan"
The Dr Phil suit is another nail in the coffin for Aruba.  I'm just not ready to jump on the Phil bandwagon yet, he hasn't convinced me his mission is to help the family bring these criminals to justice.


Yup, the whole USA got an update on the case today........he was very emphatic about his continued support in the search for Natalee, and/or what happened to her. It was good to hear.....


Title: Lively Case Discussion #561 12/16 - 12/18/2006
Post by: robots on December 18, 2006, 09:00:24 PM
Quote from: "Sue"

Robot...... I hate them also


i know you do, and that me robots very very veyr happy

 :lol:  :lol:  :lol:  :lol:  :lol:  :lol:  :lol:  :lol:  :lol:



SEE, how happy i AM  :twisted:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #561 12/16 - 12/18/2006
Post by: Elaine on December 18, 2006, 09:01:02 PM
Quote from: "Florida"
If anyone has a handy "Who's Who from RU"

I'd appreciate it.....Never paid much attention...
As I believe they are all FOS.
I don't know who is who or what, but I do know that a lot of them are morally bankrupt.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #561 12/16 - 12/18/2006
Post by: crazybabyborg on December 18, 2006, 09:01:06 PM
Quote from: "Florida"
Quote from: "crazybabyborg"
I only have the name "Florida" to go on, so..........


Hi...Is this a reference to ME?


Hi Florida! Would you like a Christmas avatar? I don't have anything to go on in terms of what you'd like, but will help, if you want.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #561 12/16 - 12/18/2006
Post by: bleachedblack on December 18, 2006, 09:01:22 PM
Quote from: "IndyDan"
I did not like the question Phil asked Beth: " How does it make you feel that we're being sued because of our pursuit to bring justice for Natalee" <Not the exact words but the way I heard them>.

Dr Phil can be a great asset and he did promise Beth he'd commit all his energy resources to finding justice for Natalee, but it took a lawsuit to get him to address the case again after he made that promise to her almost a year ago on Natl TV.

At this time I have more hope in the DeVries investigation.  Phil hasn't showed me he's doing anything proactive but rather responding reactively.

His show today, was just a "how great you are Dr Phil" show. Beth was slotted in at the 30 minute mark for maybe 5 minutes.  The rest of the show was a tribute to Phil.


I think the Skeeters controversy has kept him quiet.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #561 12/16 - 12/18/2006
Post by: robots on December 18, 2006, 09:01:31 PM
Quote from: "robots"
Quote from: "Sue"

Robot...... I hate them also


i know you do, and that me robots very very veyr happy

 :lol:  :lol:  :lol:  :lol:  :lol:  :lol:  :lol:  :lol:  :lol:



SEE, how happy i AM  :twisted:



stupid robots spelling at 100 percent again  :roll:  :roll:  :roll:


 :twisted:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #561 12/16 - 12/18/2006
Post by: crazybabyborg on December 18, 2006, 09:02:13 PM
Quote from: "Cat"
I think my question wasn't completely clear,earlier.In the old days several mob families existed side by side.I think aruba might have several families,like posner(money,etc,),groups including the dutch(for X and opiates)and the south americans(for cocaine).General scams could be run by any and all.I was wondering if th k2's are a part(with the step father)a part of a group seperate of the dutchies.Porn is more dutch than Columbian.Just a random thought from a disorganized brain.I am strang monkey/cat


How about you, Cat? Would you like a Christmas avatar?


Title: Lively Case Discussion #561 12/16 - 12/18/2006
Post by: IndyDan on December 18, 2006, 09:03:20 PM
Quote from: "crazybabyborg"
Quote from: "IndyDan"
The Dr Phil suit is another nail in the coffin for Aruba.  I'm just not ready to jump on the Phil bandwagon yet, he hasn't convinced me his mission is to help the family bring these criminals to justice.


I've wondered that, but his objectives coincide with Beth's, whatever the motivations are, so I try to just be grateful. Actually, his comments today were reassuring to me. He pointed to Beth's involvement on the show when the tape was aired, and making that connection goes to the relationship of her case to the suit.
K2s filing mentions the "defamatory" nature of the tape AND Beth's comments on the show. Slander is part of the suit and in order to prove slander you MUST show that the information you imparted is FALSE.
Beth's case claims wrongful death and by all rights she should have been named in thier suit: that's exactly where Beth wants to be. She would be able to depose them for sure about the circumstances.  I think they left her out to avoid deposition about the details of Natalee's disappearance. The close connection, which Dr. Phil reinforced today, could be helpful to her and her case, IMO.

Cbb: I support Beth 110%, if she feels Dr Phil is behind her, I'm behind Dr Phil.  
It makes me sick our Gov't is so passive about this.  I understand the early reluctance of our Govt to get involved but it's way beyond obvious that this country has covered-up a crime against an American citizen.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #561 12/16 - 12/18/2006
Post by: crazybabyborg on December 18, 2006, 09:04:31 PM
Quote from: "IndyDan"
Quote from: "crazybabyborg"
Quote from: "IndyDan"
The Dr Phil suit is another nail in the coffin for Aruba.  I'm just not ready to jump on the Phil bandwagon yet, he hasn't convinced me his mission is to help the family bring these criminals to justice.


I've wondered that, but his objectives coincide with Beth's, whatever the motivations are, so I try to just be grateful. Actually, his comments today were reassuring to me. He pointed to Beth's involvement on the show when the tape was aired, and making that connection goes to the relationship of her case to the suit.
K2s filing mentions the "defamatory" nature of the tape AND Beth's comments on the show. Slander is part of the suit and in order to prove slander you MUST show that the information you imparted is FALSE.
Beth's case claims wrongful death and by all rights she should have been named in thier suit: that's exactly where Beth wants to be. She would be able to depose them for sure about the circumstances.  I think they left her out to avoid deposition about the details of Natalee's disappearance. The close connection, which Dr. Phil reinforced today, could be helpful to her and her case, IMO.

Cbb: I support Beth 110%, if she feels Dr Phil is behind her, I'm behind Dr Phil.  
It makes me sick our Gov't is so passive about this.  I understand the early reluctance of our Govt to get involved but it's way beyond obvious that this country has covered-up a crime against an American citizen.


I agree. I would love to have seen some gov't help in this case!


Title: Lively Case Discussion #561 12/16 - 12/18/2006
Post by: klaasend on December 18, 2006, 09:04:42 PM
Quote from: "Florida"
If anyone has a handy "Who's Who from RU"

I'd appreciate it.....Never paid much attention...
As I believe they are all FOS.

What do you mean by a who's who?  If you mean their real life information I don't have nor do I want it.  

I do agree that they are FOS.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #561 12/16 - 12/18/2006
Post by: Sue on December 18, 2006, 09:07:21 PM
Quote from: "crazybabyborg"
Quote from: "IndyDan"
Quote from: "crazybabyborg"
Quote from: "IndyDan"
The Dr Phil suit is another nail in the coffin for Aruba.  I'm just not ready to jump on the Phil bandwagon yet, he hasn't convinced me his mission is to help the family bring these criminals to justice.


I've wondered that, but his objectives coincide with Beth's, whatever the motivations are, so I try to just be grateful. Actually, his comments today were reassuring to me. He pointed to Beth's involvement on the show when the tape was aired, and making that connection goes to the relationship of her case to the suit.
K2s filing mentions the "defamatory" nature of the tape AND Beth's comments on the show. Slander is part of the suit and in order to prove slander you MUST show that the information you imparted is FALSE.
Beth's case claims wrongful death and by all rights she should have been named in thier suit: that's exactly where Beth wants to be. She would be able to depose them for sure about the circumstances.  I think they left her out to avoid deposition about the details of Natalee's disappearance. The close connection, which Dr. Phil reinforced today, could be helpful to her and her case, IMO.

Cbb: I support Beth 110%, if she feels Dr Phil is behind her, I'm behind Dr Phil.  
It makes me sick our Gov't is so passive about this.  I understand the early reluctance of our Govt to get involved but it's way beyond obvious that this country has covered-up a crime against an American citizen.


I agree. I would love to have seen some gov't help in this case!



well you can damn well bet that if they had a election riding on this they would be helping


Title: Lively Case Discussion #561 12/16 - 12/18/2006
Post by: IndyDan on December 18, 2006, 09:08:08 PM
Quote from: "bleachedblack"
Quote from: "IndyDan"
I did not like the question Phil asked Beth: " How does it make you feel that we're being sued because of our pursuit to bring justice for Natalee" <Not the exact words but the way I heard them>.

Dr Phil can be a great asset and he did promise Beth he'd commit all his energy resources to finding justice for Natalee, but it took a lawsuit to get him to address the case again after he made that promise to her almost a year ago on Natl TV.

At this time I have more hope in the DeVries investigation.  Phil hasn't showed me he's doing anything proactive but rather responding reactively.

His show today, was just a "how great you are Dr Phil" show. Beth was slotted in at the 30 minute mark for maybe 5 minutes.  The rest of the show was a tribute to Phil.


I think the Skeeters controversy has kept him quiet.

I might be wrong, but didn't Skeeters work for Phil in all this?
If so, then didn't the Doc owe an explanation?


Title: Lively Case Discussion #561 12/16 - 12/18/2006
Post by: Sue on December 18, 2006, 09:09:13 PM
Quote from: "IndyDan"
Quote from: "bleachedblack"
Quote from: "IndyDan"
I did not like the question Phil asked Beth: " How does it make you feel that we're being sued because of our pursuit to bring justice for Natalee" <Not the exact words but the way I heard them>.

Dr Phil can be a great asset and he did promise Beth he'd commit all his energy resources to finding justice for Natalee, but it took a lawsuit to get him to address the case again after he made that promise to her almost a year ago on Natl TV.

At this time I have more hope in the DeVries investigation.  Phil hasn't showed me he's doing anything proactive but rather responding reactively.

His show today, was just a "how great you are Dr Phil" show. Beth was slotted in at the 30 minute mark for maybe 5 minutes.  The rest of the show was a tribute to Phil.


I think the Skeeters controversy has kept him quiet.

I might be wrong, but didn't Skeeters work for Phil in all this?
If so, then didn't the Doc owe an explanation?


Doc hired skeeter to do all this.. that is why skeeters is so quiet he worked for the doc


Title: Lively Case Discussion #561 12/16 - 12/18/2006
Post by: Florida on December 18, 2006, 09:13:09 PM
Quote from: "crazybabyborg"
Quote from: "Florida"
Quote from: "crazybabyborg"
I only have the name "Florida" to go on, so..........


Hi...Is this a reference to ME?


Hi Florida! Would you like a Christmas avatar? I don't have anything to go on in terms of what you'd like, but will help, if you want.


I'd LOVE one!
Maybe the state of Florida with a Santa's hat?
TIA!


Title: Lively Case Discussion #561 12/16 - 12/18/2006
Post by: bleachedblack on December 18, 2006, 09:14:31 PM
Quote from: "IndyDan"
Quote from: "bleachedblack"
Quote from: "IndyDan"
I did not like the question Phil asked Beth: " How does it make you feel that we're being sued because of our pursuit to bring justice for Natalee" <Not the exact words but the way I heard them>.

Dr Phil can be a great asset and he did promise Beth he'd commit all his energy resources to finding justice for Natalee, but it took a lawsuit to get him to address the case again after he made that promise to her almost a year ago on Natl TV.

At this time I have more hope in the DeVries investigation.  Phil hasn't showed me he's doing anything proactive but rather responding reactively.

His show today, was just a "how great you are Dr Phil" show. Beth was slotted in at the 30 minute mark for maybe 5 minutes.  The rest of the show was a tribute to Phil.


I think the Skeeters controversy has kept him quiet.

I might be wrong, but didn't Skeeters work for Phil in all this?
If so, then didn't the Doc owe an explanation?


Skeeters was hired by Dr Phil. Skeeters has said numerous times in the past, he did not manipulate the tape, and Dr Phill said today he stands behind everything previously said and done, and will continue to do the same. I believe him.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #561 12/16 - 12/18/2006
Post by: crazybabyborg on December 18, 2006, 09:14:32 PM
The suit was aimed at deep pockets, hence the producer, Dr. Phil, Oprah's division, and finally Skeeters and Skeeter's company. Even Tacky said the other night that it comes down to whether Dr. Phil KNEW the tape was altered. ( I know, it wasn't altered, but hey, it's Tacky).
My point is: IF the tape were altered purposefully to change the meaning of DK's answers, the one and only defendent who has no out, is Skeeter's.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #561 12/16 - 12/18/2006
Post by: Florida on December 18, 2006, 09:15:03 PM
Quote from: "klaasend"
Quote from: "Florida"
If anyone has a handy "Who's Who from RU"

I'd appreciate it.....Never paid much attention...
As I believe they are all FOS.

What do you mean by a who's who?  If you mean their real life information I don't have nor do I want it.  

I do agree that they are FOS.


Like....
SandraK=
BonDia=
ScubaJap=
Glenda=


Title: Lively Case Discussion #561 12/16 - 12/18/2006
Post by: crazybabyborg on December 18, 2006, 09:15:53 PM
Quote from: "Florida"
Quote from: "crazybabyborg"
Quote from: "Florida"
Quote from: "crazybabyborg"
I only have the name "Florida" to go on, so..........


Hi...Is this a reference to ME?


Hi Florida! Would you like a Christmas avatar? I don't have anything to go on in terms of what you'd like, but will help, if you want.


I'd LOVE one!
Maybe the state of Florida with a Santa's hat?
TIA!


Let me see what I can do..........
Warning! I'm not fast, but I am willing!  :lol: BRB


Title: Lively Case Discussion #561 12/16 - 12/18/2006
Post by: robots on December 18, 2006, 09:17:05 PM
Quote from: "Florida"
Quote from: "klaasend"
Quote from: "Florida"
If anyone has a handy "Who's Who from RU"

I'd appreciate it.....Never paid much attention...
As I believe they are all FOS.

What do you mean by a who's who?  If you mean their real life information I don't have nor do I want it.  

I do agree that they are FOS.


Like....
SandraK=
BonDia=
ScubaJap=
Glenda=



HAG

WENCH

JERK


and a few other names  :twisted:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #561 12/16 - 12/18/2006
Post by: Florida on December 18, 2006, 09:21:44 PM
Joran was to attend St. Leo's College in Pasco County, FL
Where I live....

You would be surprised to learn the connections to Aruba,
Chicago Pornography, & Escort Resorts I have found here....

I wonder....Could Natalee be here?


Title: Lively Case Discussion #561 12/16 - 12/18/2006
Post by: MuffyBee on December 18, 2006, 09:25:51 PM
Quote from: "Florida"
Joran was to attend St. Leo's College in Pasco County, FL
Where I live....

You would be surprised to learn the connections to Aruba,
Chicago Pornography, & Escort Resorts I have found here....

I wonder....Could Natalee be here?


Why would you say Natalee would be there?  From what I understand, her family believes she is no longer of this world.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #561 12/16 - 12/18/2006
Post by: klaasend on December 18, 2006, 09:26:59 PM
Quote from: "Florida"
Quote from: "klaasend"
Quote from: "Florida"
If anyone has a handy "Who's Who from RU"

I'd appreciate it.....Never paid much attention...
As I believe they are all FOS.

What do you mean by a who's who?  If you mean their real life information I don't have nor do I want it.  

I do agree that they are FOS.


Like....
SandraK=
BonDia=
ScubaJap=
Glenda=


Bondia posted at SM and is Julia Renfro.  Glenda posts at RU and FOB and is Julia Renfro.  Julia Renfro is a hag and is FOS, IMO.  :wink:

Not sure who Scubajap is but I'm sure one of Julia's journalist friends.  

SandraK - I do know her real name but will not post it.  She does live in Michigan as she has stated.  She has also mentioned having another home in Key West.  She also posted at RWV under the name of Key West.  She has "issues" to put it mildly. IMO  :wink:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #561 12/16 - 12/18/2006
Post by: Florida on December 18, 2006, 09:27:37 PM
It is my opinion that Natalee was kidnapped from Aruba.....


Title: Lively Case Discussion #561 12/16 - 12/18/2006
Post by: klaasend on December 18, 2006, 09:28:15 PM
Quote from: "Florida"
Joran was to attend St. Leo's College in Pasco County, FL
Where I live....

You would be surprised to learn the connections to Aruba,
Chicago Pornography, & Escort Resorts I have found here....

I wonder....Could Natalee be here?

Not a chance, IMO.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #561 12/16 - 12/18/2006
Post by: MuffyBee on December 18, 2006, 09:29:08 PM
Quote from: "Florida"
It is my opinion that Natalee was kidnapped from Aruba.....


You are of course entitled to your opinion.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #561 12/16 - 12/18/2006
Post by: Florida on December 18, 2006, 09:30:27 PM
Thank you...I wish you knew what I know now.....


Title: Lively Case Discussion #561 12/16 - 12/18/2006
Post by: Florida on December 18, 2006, 09:31:26 PM
Who would GLENDA be?


Title: Lively Case Discussion #561 12/16 - 12/18/2006
Post by: klaasend on December 18, 2006, 09:31:33 PM
Quote from: "Florida"
Thank you...I wish you knew what I know now.....

Florida - please refrain from comments like this, they only cause arguments.  

If you know something tell us or don't say anything at all.

TIA


Title: Lively Case Discussion #561 12/16 - 12/18/2006
Post by: Elaine on December 18, 2006, 09:31:53 PM
scubajap may be Dilma Arends


Title: Lively Case Discussion #561 12/16 - 12/18/2006
Post by: klaasend on December 18, 2006, 09:31:56 PM
Quote from: "Florida"
Who would GLENDA be?

JULIA RENFRO


Title: Lively Case Discussion #561 12/16 - 12/18/2006
Post by: crazybabyborg on December 18, 2006, 09:33:43 PM
(http://i25.photobucket.com/albums/c100/crazybabyborgs/Florida2.jpg)
http://i25.photobucket.com/albums/c100/crazybabyborgs/Florida2.jpg

Will this do, Florida?


Title: Lively Case Discussion #561 12/16 - 12/18/2006
Post by: klaasend on December 18, 2006, 09:34:22 PM
Quote from: "crazybabyborg"
(http://i25.photobucket.com/albums/c100/crazybabyborgs/Florida2.jpg)
http://i25.photobucket.com/albums/c100/crazybabyborgs/Florida2.jpg

Will this do, Florida?


Looks like a gun with a santa hat.  Maybe San could use it, lol  :lol:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #561 12/16 - 12/18/2006
Post by: msmarple on December 18, 2006, 09:35:53 PM
Quote from: "Florida"
Thank you...I wish you knew what I know now.....


Florida - Perhaps you could try cultivating a sympathetic ear with a detective at your local police dept.?

I do not think that Natalee is alive, but that's not to say that kidnapping, porn or snuff film, or something else wasn't part of the initial plan.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #561 12/16 - 12/18/2006
Post by: Florida on December 18, 2006, 09:36:47 PM
Quote from: "crazybabyborg"
(http://i25.photobucket.com/albums/c100/crazybabyborgs/Florida2.jpg)
http://i25.photobucket.com/albums/c100/crazybabyborgs/Florida2.jpg

Will this do, Florida?


I LOVE it, thanks!


Title: Lively Case Discussion #561 12/16 - 12/18/2006
Post by: crazybabyborg on December 18, 2006, 09:37:20 PM
Quote from: "klaasend"
Quote from: "crazybabyborg"
(http://i25.photobucket.com/albums/c100/crazybabyborgs/Florida2.jpg)
http://i25.photobucket.com/albums/c100/crazybabyborgs/Florida2.jpg

Will this do, Florida?


Looks like a gun with a santa hat.  Maybe San could use it, lol  :lol:


OMG! You're right!  :shock:  :shock:  :shock:  :lol:

I just have to chime in.........................SandraK was in her prime when I first got here, and I'm REALLY glad she's not here anymore!


Title: Lively Case Discussion #561 12/16 - 12/18/2006
Post by: San on December 18, 2006, 09:37:39 PM
Quote from: "klaasend"
Quote from: "crazybabyborg"
(http://i25.photobucket.com/albums/c100/crazybabyborgs/Florida2.jpg)
http://i25.photobucket.com/albums/c100/crazybabyborgs/Florida2.jpg

Will this do, Florida?


Looks like a gun with a santa hat.  Maybe San could use it, lol  :lol:

OMG when I first saw this that what I thought it was :lol:  :lol: .  I like it.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #561 12/16 - 12/18/2006
Post by: msmarple on December 18, 2006, 09:39:05 PM
Quote from: "Florida"
Quote from: "crazybabyborg"
(http://i25.photobucket.com/albums/c100/crazybabyborgs/Florida2.jpg)
http://i25.photobucket.com/albums/c100/crazybabyborgs/Florida2.jpg

Will this do, Florida?


I LOVE it, thanks!


Well - everybody's a critic - I think Florida should be green, with blue water in the background ...  :lol:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #561 12/16 - 12/18/2006
Post by: crazybabyborg on December 18, 2006, 09:39:38 PM
Florida.....................let me do another one, and then you can choose. I didn't step back and look at it until it was posted. BRB!


Title: Lively Case Discussion #561 12/16 - 12/18/2006
Post by: klaasend on December 18, 2006, 09:40:36 PM
CBB - show Florida the other one you did with the palm trees.  She may not have seen that one.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #561 12/16 - 12/18/2006
Post by: Florida on December 18, 2006, 09:40:52 PM
Quote from: "msmarple"
Quote from: "Florida"
Thank you...I wish you knew what I know now.....


Florida - Perhaps you could try cultivating a sympathetic ear with a detective at your local police dept.?

I do not think that Natalee is alive, but that's not to say that kidnapping, porn or snuff film, or something else wasn't part of the initial plan.


Actually, I was thinking of that tonight....Do the Families/FBI know what I have uncovered here in the Tampa area of Florida......


Title: Lively Case Discussion #561 12/16 - 12/18/2006
Post by: justinsmama on December 18, 2006, 09:41:34 PM
Quote from: "klaasend"


Bondia posted at SM and is Julia Renfro.  Glenda posts at RU and FOB and is Julia Renfro.  Julia Renfro is a hag and is FOS, IMO.  :wink:

Not sure who Scubajap is but I'm sure one of Julia's journalist friends.  

SandraK - I do know her real name but will not post it.  She does live in Michigan as she has stated.  She has also mentioned having another home in Key West.  She also posted at RWV under the name of Key West.  She has "issues" to put it mildly. IMO  :wink:


You left out that Julia is also Fluffa.[/b]


Title: Lively Case Discussion #561 12/16 - 12/18/2006
Post by: SunFreak2 on December 18, 2006, 09:42:49 PM
Quote from: "crazybabyborg"
The suit was aimed at deep pockets, hence the producer, Dr. Phil, Oprah's division, and finally Skeeters and Skeeter's company. Even Tacky said the other night that it comes down to whether Dr. Phil KNEW the tape was altered. ( I know, it wasn't altered, but hey, it's Tacky).
My point is: IF the tape were altered purposefully to change the meaning of DK's answers, the one and only defendent who has no out, is Skeeter's.


Skeeter's has had his tape verified by at least 45 professionals who authenticate it. (35 American, 8 Dutch, 2 Venezuelan).  

In the world of chess, we could say "Check & Mate"


Title: Lively Case Discussion #561 12/16 - 12/18/2006
Post by: robots on December 18, 2006, 09:42:49 PM
Quote from: "Florida"
Joran was to attend St. Leo's College in Pasco County, FL
Where I live....

You would be surprised to learn the connections to Aruba,
Chicago Pornography, & Escort Resorts I have found here....

I wonder....Could Natalee be here?



not a chance


Title: Lively Case Discussion #561 12/16 - 12/18/2006
Post by: BTgirl on December 18, 2006, 09:44:21 PM
Quote from: "justinsmama"
Quote from: "klaasend"


Bondia posted at SM and is Julia Renfro.  Glenda posts at RU and FOB and is Julia Renfro.  Julia Renfro is a hag and is FOS, IMO.  :wink:

Not sure who Scubajap is but I'm sure one of Julia's journalist friends.  

SandraK - I do know her real name but will not post it.  She does live in Michigan as she has stated.  She has also mentioned having another home in Key West.  She also posted at RWV under the name of Key West.  She has "issues" to put it mildly. IMO  :wink:


You left out that Julia is also Fluffa.[/b]


Justins,

Sam and I are talking up a storm in the lounge. Don't forget to read what we've said, okay? I answered your last question to me.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #561 12/16 - 12/18/2006
Post by: klaasend on December 18, 2006, 09:44:52 PM
Quote from: "SunFreak2"
Quote from: "crazybabyborg"
The suit was aimed at deep pockets, hence the producer, Dr. Phil, Oprah's division, and finally Skeeters and Skeeter's company. Even Tacky said the other night that it comes down to whether Dr. Phil KNEW the tape was altered. ( I know, it wasn't altered, but hey, it's Tacky).
My point is: IF the tape were altered purposefully to change the meaning of DK's answers, the one and only defendent who has no out, is Skeeter's.


Skeeter's has had his tape verified by at least 45 professionals who authenticate it. (35 American, 8 Dutch, 2 Venezuelan).  

In the world of chess, we could say "Check & Mate
"


YUP  :lol:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #561 12/16 - 12/18/2006
Post by: justinsmama on December 18, 2006, 09:44:56 PM
Quote from: "Florida"
Quote from: "msmarple"
Quote from: "Florida"
Thank you...I wish you knew what I know now.....


Florida - Perhaps you could try cultivating a sympathetic ear with a detective at your local police dept.?

I do not think that Natalee is alive, but that's not to say that kidnapping, porn or snuff film, or something else wasn't part of the initial plan.


Actually, I was thinking of that tonight....Do the Families/FBI know what I have uncovered here in the Tampa area of Florida......


Dave Holloway has email addy to send tips.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #561 12/16 - 12/18/2006
Post by: Florida on December 18, 2006, 09:47:22 PM
crazybabyborg:

Did someone ask you to make an avatar for me?


Title: Lively Case Discussion #561 12/16 - 12/18/2006
Post by: msmarple on December 18, 2006, 09:47:42 PM
Quote from: "Florida"
Actually, I was thinking of that tonight....Do the Families/FBI know what I have uncovered here in the Tampa area of Florida......


I doubt you could surprise the FBI  8)  and I certainly don't know what the family knows ... but if you think you can make a connection, I suggest (a) FBI, if there's a local branch; or (b) Police Dept.

Try to make an appointment.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #561 12/16 - 12/18/2006
Post by: Elaine on December 18, 2006, 09:47:50 PM
Quote from: "SunFreak2"
Quote from: "crazybabyborg"
The suit was aimed at deep pockets, hence the producer, Dr. Phil, Oprah's division, and finally Skeeters and Skeeter's company. Even Tacky said the other night that it comes down to whether Dr. Phil KNEW the tape was altered. ( I know, it wasn't altered, but hey, it's Tacky).
My point is: IF the tape were altered purposefully to change the meaning of DK's answers, the one and only defendent who has no out, is Skeeter's.


Skeeter's has had his tape verified by at least 45 professionals who authenticate it. (35 American, 8 Dutch, 2 Venezuelan).  

In the world of chess, we could say "Check & Mate"
I agree!


Title: Lively Case Discussion #561 12/16 - 12/18/2006
Post by: klaasend on December 18, 2006, 09:48:19 PM
I'm not CBB but I can tell you she's doing all this on her own.  She decided she'd make festive avatars for everyone!  :wink:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #561 12/16 - 12/18/2006
Post by: crazybabyborg on December 18, 2006, 09:49:11 PM
(http://i25.photobucket.com/albums/c100/crazybabyborgs/greenflorida.jpg)
http://i25.photobucket.com/albums/c100/crazybabyborgs/greenflorida.jpg


Ok, you smartasses! Any better?  :lol:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #561 12/16 - 12/18/2006
Post by: msmarple on December 18, 2006, 09:49:16 PM
Quote from: "Florida"
crazybabyborg:

Did someone ask you to make an avatar for me?


No, CBB thinks no avatar should go undecorated ...


Title: Lively Case Discussion #561 12/16 - 12/18/2006
Post by: robots on December 18, 2006, 09:49:54 PM
skeeeeeeeeeters aint stupid


i know some stupid people and he aint one  8)


Title: Lively Case Discussion #561 12/16 - 12/18/2006
Post by: klaasend on December 18, 2006, 09:50:23 PM
CBB - post the PALM TREE one.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #561 12/16 - 12/18/2006
Post by: crazybabyborg on December 18, 2006, 09:55:23 PM
Quote from: "msmarple"
Quote from: "Florida"
crazybabyborg:

Did someone ask you to make an avatar for me?


No, CBB thinks no avatar should go undecorated ...


There's a twelve step program I'm looking into.............

Ya'll are killing me! ROFL!

No, Florida, msmarple pretty well has it right. You don't have to use it. Honest! It's not about gratification that someone LIKES it ( obviously ), I just feel bad when I see someone without one and don't know if they just don't know how or something................
So, I just butt continuously in to relevent conversation with these pictures, and nobody has slapped my hand for it yet!  :lol:
(You're addressing someone who, as a kid, put every doll I had in the bed while I slept on the floor because my big sister told me they were lonely!  :oops: )  :lol:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #561 12/16 - 12/18/2006
Post by: SunFreak2 on December 18, 2006, 09:55:35 PM
Quote from: "msmarple"
Quote from: "Florida"
crazybabyborg:

Did someone ask you to make an avatar for me?


No, CBB thinks no avatar should go undecorated ...


 :lol:  :lol:  :lol:

Hi Ms Marple!!


Title: Lively Case Discussion #561 12/16 - 12/18/2006
Post by: sb on December 18, 2006, 09:55:46 PM
Hey CBB, thanks for the avatar!

I like it, the problem I have is that it is SOOOO hard to get to my remote-hosting site and it really only holds 1 picture at a time. It's a really confusing setup they have. You have to re-do the layout and the directory setup for EVERY download.

I'll see if I can find a way to use it for a few days.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #561 12/16 - 12/18/2006
Post by: klaasend on December 18, 2006, 09:57:09 PM
Quote from: "sb"
Hey CBB, thanks for the avatar!

I like it, the problem I have is that it is SOOOO hard to get to my remote-hosting site and it really only holds 1 picture at a time. It's a really confusing setup they have. You have to re-do the layout and the directory setup for EVERY download.

I'll see if I can find a way to use it for a few days.


SB - if you right mouse click on the picture and copy the url, then you can simply paste it into the third option in your profile without saving it.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #561 12/16 - 12/18/2006
Post by: crazybabyborg on December 18, 2006, 09:58:33 PM
(http://i25.photobucket.com/albums/c100/crazybabyborgs/PalmTreeChristmas.jpg)
http://i25.photobucket.com/albums/c100/crazybabyborgs/PalmTreeChristmas.jpg

This is what I started with, Klaas. I can't post....tears are rolling!  :lol:


Title: Lively Case Discussion #561 12/16 - 12/18/2006
Post by: klaasend on December 18, 2006, 09:59:34 PM
Quote from: "crazybabyborg"
(http://i25.photobucket.com/albums/c100/crazybabyborgs/PalmTreeChristmas.jpg)
http://i25.photobucket.com/albums/c100/crazybabyborgs/PalmTreeChristmas.jpg

This is what I started with, Klaas. I can't post....tears are rolling!  :lol:


See, I like that one the best even though it's not the "shape" of Florida.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #561 12/16 - 12/18/2006
Post by: Florida on December 18, 2006, 10:00:00 PM
Thanks, CBB!


Title: Lively Case Discussion #561 12/16 - 12/18/2006
Post by: crazybabyborg on December 18, 2006, 10:00:03 PM
Quote from: "sb"
Hey CBB, thanks for the avatar!

I like it, the problem I have is that it is SOOOO hard to get to my remote-hosting site and it really only holds 1 picture at a time. It's a really confusing setup they have. You have to re-do the layout and the directory setup for EVERY download.

I'll see if I can find a way to use it for a few days.


Oh Lord, SB, Don't do it! It's fine, really!


Title: Lively Case Discussion #561 12/16 - 12/18/2006
Post by: klaasend on December 18, 2006, 10:01:32 PM
FLORIDA - In case you didn't know.  All you have to do is copy the link and paste it into the THIRD option in your profile for avatars.


Title: Udate please
Post by: IBE on December 18, 2006, 10:02:44 PM
Just got back.. before the tread changes what did I miss today?

Am writing to you a very touching story I just heard from a Marine Veteran about Natalee Holloway.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #561 12/16 - 12/18/2006
Post by: klaasend on December 18, 2006, 10:03:07 PM
Quote from: "klaasend"
FLORIDA - In case you didn't know.  All you have to do is copy the link and paste it into the THIRD option in your profile for avatars.


But it has to be in the THIRD option and without the IMG tags or it won't work.  :wink:


Title: Re: Udate please
Post by: klaasend on December 18, 2006, 10:04:06 PM
Quote from: "IBE"
Just got back.. before the tread changes what did I miss today?

Am writing to you a very touching story I just heard from a Marine Veteran about Natalee Holloway.


Hi IBE - Why don't you go to the new thread and start posting your story there.  I'd hate to have you in the middle of a post when I lock this thread.  The new thread is already unlocked.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #561 12/16 - 12/18/2006
Post by: Elaine on December 18, 2006, 10:04:47 PM
which programs do you guys use to make all these cute avatars?


Title: Lively Case Discussion #561 12/16 - 12/18/2006
Post by: msmarple on December 18, 2006, 10:05:31 PM
Hi SunFreak - Are we well yet ???  :lol:

I have something for the pet-obsessed monkeys ... The Atlanta Journal-Constitution is doing pet Christmas pictures:

http://lpe.ajc.com/gallery/view/holidayguide/2006/santapet1

And SF, I expect to see some of yours there ASAP!


Title: Lively Case Discussion #561 12/16 - 12/18/2006
Post by: klaasend on December 18, 2006, 10:05:43 PM
Quote from: "Elaine"
which programs do you guys use to make all these cute avatars?


I think CBB and I use the same programs.  Photoshop and Image Ready for the animated gifs.


Title: Lively Case Discussion #561 12/16 - 12/18/2006
Post by: SunFreak2 on December 18, 2006, 10:06:46 PM
BUMP, BUMP, BUMPITY UMP BUMP


Title: Lively Case Discussion #561 12/16 - 12/18/2006
Post by: Elaine on December 18, 2006, 10:06:48 PM
Quote from: "klaasend"
Quote from: "Elaine"
which programs do you guys use to make all these cute avatars?


I think CBB and I use the same programs.  Photoshop and Image Ready for the animated gifs.
thanks klaas!


Title: Lively Case Discussion #561 12/16 - 12/18/2006
Post by: sb on December 18, 2006, 10:07:11 PM
Got it working, and I saved the address for the original too so I can go back to it after Christmas. Thanks y'all!

Now who says us men don't get into the Christmas spirit...


Title: Lively Case Discussion #561 12/16 - 12/18/2006
Post by: klaasend on December 18, 2006, 10:07:43 PM
Quote from: "sb"
Got it working, and I saved the address for the original too so I can go back to it after Christmas. Thanks y'all!

Now who says us men don't get into the Christmas spirit...


SB - you look great!


Title: Lively Case Discussion #561 12/16 - 12/18/2006
Post by: San on December 18, 2006, 10:07:48 PM
8)


Title: Lively Case Discussion #561 12/16 - 12/18/2006
Post by: Elaine on December 18, 2006, 10:08:22 PM
Quote from: "sb"
Got it working, and I saved the address for the original too so I can go back to it after Christmas. Thanks y'all!

Now who says us men don't get into the Christmas spirit...
Well, don't you look handsome!


Title: Lively Case Discussion #561 12/16 - 12/18/2006
Post by: klaasend on December 18, 2006, 10:08:36 PM
(http://i37.photobucket.com/albums/e82/klaasend2/nowlocked.jpg)

Please move to LCD# 562

http://www.scaredmonkeys.net/viewtopic.php?t=657


Title: Lively Case Discussion #561 12/16 - 12/18/2006
Post by: SunFreak2 on December 18, 2006, 10:09:01 PM
Quote from: "msmarple"
Hi SunFreak - Are we well yet ???  :lol:

I have something for the pet-obsessed monkeys ... The Atlanta Journal-Constitution is doing pet Christmas pictures:

http://lpe.ajc.com/gallery/view/holidayguide/2006/santapet1

And SF, I expect to see some of yours there ASAP!



Thanks for the link!